Skip to main content

Full text of "Shakespeare and his days: a study of the topical element in Shakespeare and in the Elizabethan drama"

See other formats


LIBRARY 


UNIVERSITY  OF  CALIFORNIA. 


Class 


Shakespeare  and  His  Day 

A  STUDY  OF  THE 

TOPICAL  ELEMENT  IN  SHAKESPEARE 
AND  IN   THE  ELIZABETHAN  DRAMA 


tije  J^anujss  $rt?e  <£g0ag,  1901 


BY 

J.  A.  DE  ROTHSCHILD 

TRINITY    COLLEGE,    CAMBRIDGE 


LONDON 

EDWARD    ARNOLD 

41   AND  43  MADDOX  STREET,  BOND  STREET,  W. 
1906 


C-ENEfiAL 


TO    THOSE    OF    MY    FRIENDS 
WHO    WILL    READ    IT 


DEDICATE 
THIS    BOOK 


<  When  Shakespeare,  Jonson,  Fletcher,  ruled  the  stage, 
They  took  so  bold  a  freedom  with  the  age, 
That  there  was  scarce  a  knave  or  fool  in  town 
Of  any  note  but  had  his  picture  down.1 

SIR  CHARLES  SCROPE  before  1680. 

'Many   of  our    Shakespeare's   plays,   you   know,   are 
founded  upon  authenticated  facts.' 

STERNE,  Tristram  Shandy. 


FOREWORD 

IN  writing  the  following  pages  an  attempt  has 
been  made  to  extract  from  the  Elizabethan  drama 
something  of  Elizabethan  life.  There  is  no 
field  perhaps  that  could  offer  a  wealthier  fund 
of  Elizabethan  remains  than  the  contemporary 
drama.  Grey  piles  stand  here  and  there  to 
remind  one  of  the  past ;  but  more  eloquent  than 
masonry  is  the  literature  of  that  time,  and  the 
spirit  it  enshrines  is,  after  all,  the  finest  link 
with  those  days. 

What  has  been  done  will  doubtless  partake  of 
the  limitations  of  an  essay  on  a  set  subject ;  and  yet 
it  is  hoped  that  the  result  will  neither  be  devoid 
of  interest,  nor  without  its  uses  for  purposes 
of  study.  The  treatment  is  obviously  far  from 
exhaustive  on  a  subject  which  opens  up  so  many 


vi       SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

vistas  and  ranges  over  so  long  a  period.  If  but 
some  few  nooks  and  corners  of  the  Elizabethan 
background  have  been  lit  up  in  the  process,  it 
is  felt  that  the  undertaking  will  in  some  measure 
have  justified  itself. 

The  scheme  of  the  work  is  briefly  this  :  in  the 
first  place,  to  shadow  forth  some  of  the  Elizabethan 
personalities  and  events ;  and,  secondly,  to  evolve 
something  of  the  general  colours  and  forms  of 
Shakespeare's  times.  The  creator  of  Falstaff  has 
therefore  been  taken  as  the  main  subject  of 
investigation  ;  his  fellow-dramatists  have  merely 
supplied  subsidiary  detail. 

It  is  believed  that  the  picture  produced  by 
these  allusions  massed  together  represents  work 
of  an  independent  character ;  but  for  some  of 
the  particular  points,  dealing  with  definite  per- 
sonages or  events,  indebtedness  must  be  acknow- 
ledged to  Dr.  Ward's  History  of  English  Dramatic 
Literature,  to  a  paper  by  Mr.  Sidney  Lee  in  the 
Gentleman  s  Magazine,  1880,  as  well  as  to  certain 
of  the  contributions  made  to  the  Transactions  of 


FOREWORD  vii 

the  New  Shakespeare  Society.  The  opportunity 
of  so  doing  is  here  gladly  taken,  as  also  of  thank- 
ing a  friend,  who  wishes  to  remain  nameless,  for 
his  kindness  in  reading  the  proofs  and  in  suggest- 
ing certain  valuable  alterations. 

LONDON,  April  1906. 


CONTENTS 

CHAPTER    I 

PAGES 

ON  THE   PRESENCE    OF  A  TOPICAL  ELEMENT 

IN  THE  ELIZABETHAN  DRAMA,     .        .        .      1-25 

The  topical  element  in  the  Greek  drama,  i. — Its 
presence  in  the  Elizabethan  drama  ;  evidence  of  con- 
temporaries, 5  $  of  the  dramatists,  9. — Evidence  of  a 
more  indirect  character,  13. — Comparison  of  the  Eliza- 
bethan with  the  modern  stage  in  this  respect,  18. — 
Conclusion,  25. 

CHAPTER    II 

ON  PARTICULAR   ALLUSIONS    OF   THE   ELIZA- 
BETHAN STAGE,          .  . 26-99 

Allusions,  particular  and  general,  26. — I.  Allusions  to 
Elizabeth^  29  j  II.  to  James  /.,  395  III.  to  the  Court , 
45  j  to  Essex,  46  ;  Leicester,  48  j  Burleigh,  Southamp- 
ton, Sidney,  Pembroke,  49  j  Arabella  Stuart,  52  $  IV. 
to  fellow-dramatists ,  53. — The  Jonson,  Marston,  and 
Dekker  dispute,  53. — Shakespeare's  part  in  it,  58. — 
Allusions  to  Shakespeare,  63  ;  to  Jonson  and  Marlowe,  675 
Greene,  68  5  Lodge  and  Spenser,  69  ;  Nash  and  Marston, 
70  j  Holinshed,  Fletcher,  and  Beaumont,  715  to  con- 


SHAKESPEARE   AND   HIS   DAY 

FACES 

temporary  actors,  72 j  V.  to  other  contemporaries: 
Stukely,  Roderigo  Lopez,  74. — The  Welsh  Sir  Hugh, 
75. — Drake  and  the  Armada,  76. — Sir  Thomas  Lucy, 
77. — Phantasticall  Monarcho,  78. — The  brothers  Shirley, 
79. — Sir  Thomas  Gresham  and  Hobson,  80. — Garnet 
the  Jesuit,  Bankes  the  showman,  and  the  old  woman  of 
Brentford,  81. — Mary  Frith,  82. — VI.  Contemporary 
incidents:  Derby's  wedding  festivities,  83. — The  Gowrie 
Conspiracy,  84. — Creation  of  children-actors,  84. — 
Summers'  voyage  to  Virginia,  85. — Raleigh's  explora- 
tions, and  the  Statute  of  the  Streets,  87. — Privy  Council's 
order j  Poor  Law,  1601,  88. — Earthquake,  88. — Mov- 
able topmast,  and  new  map,  89. — Overbury  murder,  90. 
— VII.  Foreign  events  and  personalities,  91. 


CHAPTER    III 

ON  THE  GENERAL  ALLUSIONS  OF  THE  ELIZA- 

BETH  AN  STAGE, 100-236 

The  general  allusion,  100. — I.  Reflections  of  Country 
life,  105  j  hawking,  hunting,  angling,  114;  archery,  u8j 
rustic  festivals,  120. — II.  London  life,  125  $  place-names, 
128  $  manners  and  affectations  of  London  gallants,  129  j 
ladies'  manners  and  fashions,  141 ;  sports  and  pastimes, 
145  j  tobacco-smoking,  147  $  places  of  public  resort, 
149;  tavern- scenes,  154;  prisons,  159;  beggars,  and 
the  watch,  162. — III.  Professional  life,  167$  medical 
matters,  168  ;  legal  matters,  1705  teachers  and  schools, 
1725  the  Universities,  175;  military  matters,  177$ 
adventurers  and  travellers,  1815  newsvenders,  185$ 
tradesmen,  186. — IV.  Home-life,  189;  interior  of  royal 


CONTENTS  xi 

PAGES 

halls,  1895  feasts  and  meals,  195. — V.  Theatres,  202; 
reflection  of  the  earlier  stage,  203  j  the  actor,  206  $  the 
audience  and  its  behaviour,  2105  staging,  212;  abuses, 
215, — VI.  Religion,  etc.,  2195  Puritans,  221;  supersti- 
tion, 225  j  legends,  astrology,  227 ;  witches,  228 ; 
alchemists,  231  j  fairyland,  233. 


ENVOY, 237-251 

Topical  reflections  on  the  drama  correspond  to 
national  changes,  238. — Shakespeare's  topical  allusions 
afford  no  clue  to  his  earlier  profession,  242. — The  light 
they  afford  as  to  the  chronology  of  his  plays,  244. — 
Artistic  importance  of  the  topical  allusion,  249. — 
Conclusion,  251. 


OFTHF 

UNIVERSITY 

OF 


CHAPTER   I 

ON    THE    PRESENCE    OF    A    TOPICAL    ELEMENT 
IN    THE    ELIZABETHAN    DRAMA 

'  Whatever  is  truly  great  and  affecting  must  have  on  it  the  strong 
stamp  of  the  native  land.'' — J.  RUSKIN. 

'  WITH  Plato  and  Aristophanes  for  our  guides 
we  can,  to  some  extent,  reconstruct  the  life  of  the 
Athenians.'1  So  wrote  a  modern  critic  well  quali- 
fied to  speak  on  the  Art  of  ancient  Greece.  And 
this  truth  was  no  product  of  modern  insight.  It 
was  one  that  was  recognised  as  far  back  as  Plato's 
own  day. 

Dionysius  of  Syracuse  once  wrote  to  that 
cultured  Athenian  philosopher  for  enlightenment 
on  Athenian  politics,  and  in  reply  a  papyrus  of 
Aristophanes'  Clouds  was  sent.  Plato  recognised 
that  this  first  great  votary  of  the  Comic  Muse 
had  found  his  inspiration  not  only  in  the  im- 
broglio of  farcical  situation,  but  in  the  details  of 
contemporary  life  as  well ;  and  so  the  comedy  was 
sent  to  supply  the  tyrant  with  what  he  wished. 
Had  he  possessed  himself  of  more  of  the  Aristo- 

1  See  Studies  of  the  Greek  Poets,  J.  A.  Symonds,  ii.  194. 
A 


2        SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

phanic  papyrus  he  would  have  had  his  picture  of 
Athens  and  of  the  things  of  Athens  enlarged  in 
no  small  degree,  so  unsparingly  did  those  comedies 
reflect  the  life  from  which  they  sprang.  He 
would  have  beheld  the  profligacy  of  the  rising 
generation  to  whom  the  Sophists  were  more  than 
their  Homer.  He  would  have  caught  an  echo  of 
the  hateful  litigation  and  baneful  rhetoric  which 
sounded  so  discordant  in  that  home  of  the  beauti- 
ful. He  might  have  read  of  the  time's  social 
licence,  its  ambitions,  its  credulity  ;  have  caught 
glimpses  of  the  Parthenon,  the  Pnyx,  and  the  law- 
courts,  or  else  have  seen  how  people  slept,  and 
walked,  and  dressed,  and  dined,  in  those  days  at 
Athens.  All  this  might  the  comedies  of  Aristo- 
phanes have  done  for  him. 

But  the  reflection  of  the  age  was  not  a  mono- 
poly that  had  been  vested  with  one  man  or  with 
one  institution,  with  Aristophanes,  or  with  the 
Comic  Stage.  The  Athenian  drama  was  a  many- 
faceted  jewel.  Its  rays  sometimes  were  shot  with 
comic  gleams  caught  from  the  light  of  common 
day.  But  elsewhere  they  threw  back  the  colours 
and  shadows  of  the  life  that  throbbed  around, 
just  as  the  Parthenon  marbles  took  colour  and 
shade  from  the  blue  above. 

When  the  little  Republic  was  heaving  with 
pride  over  Salamis  and  its  mighty  deeds,  ^Eschylus 
broke  out  in  his  Persae  into  a  long  chant  of  praise 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY        3 

and  thanksgiving.  '  No  monarch  have  they,  few 
are  they,  but  all  men  of  might,'  sang  he  who 
wrote  the  Agamemnon.  And  so  was  enshrined 
for  all  time,  the  mighty  spirit  that  fought  at 
Marathon  and  again  at  Salamis.  Nor  was  this 
an  isolated  outburst  of  Attic  patriotism.  Mos- 
chion's  ^hemistocles  had  swelled  with  the  same 
chant,  and  scattered  up  and  down  through  the 
Athenian  drama  lie  numerous  utterances  of  the 
same  wild  spirit.  Thus  did  Tragedy  preserve 
some  scenes  from  the  great  Grecian  gallery,  just  as 
Comedy  had  appropriated  others.  But  Tragedy 
in  its  stately  way  could  also  embody  the  moral 
conscience  of  the  Grecian  race,  and  speak  what 
Grecian  hearts  felt,  both  of  Time  and  of  '  the 
undiscovered  country.'  Tragedy  no  less  than 
Comedy  could  shoot  at  flying  Folly  and  hold  up 
Grecian  weakness.  It  could  panegyrise  the  Greek 
athlete.  It  could  also  condemn  him.  He  was 
*  a  beauty  bright/  or  else  merely  '  a  town  orna- 
ment/ c  one  of  the  thousand  ills  that  preyed  on 
Hellas.' *  Tragedy  could  commend  in  glowing 
words  the  Stoicism  of  the  day.  It  could  damn 
with  equal  fire  the  Hedonism  that  spent  its  days 
in  feast  and  song.  Together  with  Comedy  it 
could  reflect  the  softer  aspect  of  the  Attic  soul, 
and  gently  touch  the  Graces  into  life.  Both 
could  pile  up  in  words  the  statues  they  saw  around. 

1  Cf.  Studies  of  the  Greek  Poets,  J.  A.  Symonds,  passim. 


4        SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

Each  could  paint  the  Attic  sylvan  scene — the 
ivy-clad  swallow  haunt,  the  tangled  violets  beside 
quiet  wells,  and  dreamy  olives  so  dear  to  Grecian 
heart.  They  could  paint  every  scene,  and  place 
them  among  the  things  that  never  die.  Not  even 
the  poplar-trees  with  shivering  tops,  that  lined  the 
streets  of  Athens,  were  wanting  in  the  great 
picture  that  came  into  being  as  the  drama  grew— 
the  picture  that  gathered  strength  with  every 
stroke  of  the  dramatic  pen.  For  an  immense 
canvas  the  Grecian  drama  must  needs  be  held  to 
be.  It  was  a  picture  worked  out  in  detail,  of  all 
the  forms  and  fashions  of  Greek  life :  here  ruddy 
with  lofty  passion,  there  drab  with  the  wearying 
commonplace ;  silver-soft  with  Attic  loveliness, 
or  rough  and  harsh  with  Spartan  tones. 

If  then,  with  Plato  and  Aristophanes  for  guides, 
it  is  possible  in  some  degree  to  reconstruct  the 
life  of  the  Athenians,  with  the  help  of  the  whole 
Attic  stage  a  countless  multitude  of  further 
details  can  be  added,  and  a  creation  in  part  can 
thus  be  made  a  thing  of  more  completeness. 

How  far  can  a  parallel  to  all  this  be  found  in 
the  case  of  the  Elizabethan  drama  ?  With  what 
degree  of  truth  can  it  be  said  that  with  Shakespeare 
and  his  fellows  for  our  guides,  we  can  reconstruct 
the  Elizabethan  age?  The  conditions  of  the 
respective  ages  were  not  without  their  points  of 
contact.  Both  were  times  of  great  national  up- 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY       5 

lifting  ;  times  when  the  gods  above  were  filling 
the  hearts  and  minds  of  men  with  Titanic  fire  and 
energy,  and  when,  as  it  were,  new  civilisations, 
dawning  on  the  world,  were  lighting  it  step  by 
step  along  the  road  to  its  Olympic  destiny. 

But  whatever  the  probability  as  to  a  parallel, 
one  thing  is  certain.  The  Elizabethans  them- 
selves knew  that,  woven  in  the  texture  of  the 
drama,  were  to  be  found  many  shreds  drawn  from 
the  life  around.  Like  Plato  they  saw  that  con- 
temporary events  and  contemporary  personalities 
were  being  constantly  alluded  to  on  the  stage  ; 
and  this  testimony  from  its  very  nature  is  the 
most  weighty  that  could  possibly  be  adduced. 

'  Everie  stage-plaier,'  wrote  one  Elizabethan, 
1  made  a  jest  of  Martin  Marprelate ' ;  while  quoth 
another,  speaking  of  the  same  notoriety,  '  They 
made  of  him  a  very  May-game  on  the  stage.' l 
The  Anglicans  hit  out  at  Martin,  Martin  at  the 
Anglicans.  It  is  not  so  wonderful  that  some  of 
their  dust  kept  falling  on  the  stage.  Nor  indeed 
do  the  above  remarks  indicate  any  wonder  on  the 
part  of  contemporaries  at  the  incidents  when  they 
happened.  The  facts  are  merely  stated. 

Spenser  seems  to  have  gone  part  of  the  way 
towards  making  the  same  assertion.  In  his  'Tears 
of  the  Muses,  he  wails  over  the  degraded  drama, 
and  laments  the  c  vaine  toyes '  with  which  the 

1  See  also  Dr.  Ward's  English  Dramatic  Literature,  i.  465-6. 


6        SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

vulgar  were  entertained.  The  lament  is  only 
general,  it  is  true.  But  it  would  have  been 
signally  applicable  to  the  actions  of  the  players  in 
mingling  gossip  and  scandal  with  their  Art,  and 
in  taking  part  in  as  rude  a  controversy  as  ever 
lowered  the  dignity  of  a  literary  tribe. 

Nor  were  the  authorities  blind  to  the  stage's 
activity  in  this  direction  ;  least  of  all  when  it 
busied  itself  with  matters  of  statecraft.  Already 
in  1554  the  bishops  are  reproached  for  vexing 
and  troubling  '  the  poor  minstrels  and  players  of 
interludes/  who  found  no  favour  with  the  clergy, 
'  since  they  persuaded  the  people  to  worship  the 
Lord  aright ' *  and  not  on  the  lines  of  episcopalian 
dictation.  In  1574  the  Lord  Mayor  was  under 
the  necessity  of  petitioning  for  a  Censorship  of 
Plays.  Fifteen  years  later  plays  were  '  stayed/ 
doubtless  as  a  result  of  censorship ;  and  if  The 
Tragedy  of  Cowrie,  stayed  in  1604,  be  taken  as 
a  specimen,  such  plays  were  evidently  forbidden, 
when  their  political  tendencies  were  too  pronounced, 
or  when  they  discussed  questions  connected  with 
the  State.  On  the  evidence  therefore  of  the  staying 
of  the  plays,  and  from  the  likelihood  of  their  pro- 
hibition being  caused  by  their  topical  tendencies, 
it  must  be  inferred  that,  as  early  as  1590,  some 
plays  had  overstepped  the  limits  of  topical  licence, 
and  had  spoken  too  plainly  on  matters  of  contem- 
porary interest. 

1  Epistle  by  Henry  Stalbrydge. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY        7 

The  Queen,  who  crushed  prophesyings,  also 
launched  a  decree  forbidding  plays  to  be  acted 
'  wherein  either  matters  of  religion  or  governance 
of  the  State  should  be  handled  or  treated.'  But 
the  '  stage-plaier '  was  hardly  repressed,  and  Eliza- 
beth had  to  speak  in  angrier  tones,  to  forbid  in 
plain  terms  '  the  utterance  of  popular,  busy,  and 
seditious  matter '  on  the  stage. 

Corroboration  of  this  '  business '  of  the  theatre 
comes,  too,  from  sources  less  elevated.  c  The 
players,'  wrote  one  Calvert  in  a  private  letter  of 
1604,  '  do  not  forbear  to  present  upon  the  stage 
the  whole  course  of  the  present  time,'  and  he 
added  that  they  spared  neither  '  the  King,  the 
State,  or  religion.'  According  to  another  contem- 
porary,1 they  were  wont  to  inveigh  against  the 
State  and  the  Court,  the  Law,  the  City,  and  their 
Governments.  And  as  if  the  intellectual  grasp  of 
the  '  plaier  '  did  not  find  '  the  whole  course  of 
that  present  English  time '  a  sufficient  whetstone 
for  his  wit,  evidence  of  his  further  activity  was  at 
hand  from  over  the  Channel.  For  about  the 
same  date,  the  French  ambassador  complains 
somewhat  testily  to  the  authorities  at  Paris,  of 
the  liberties  taken  by  the  English  stage  with 
certain  notable  events  of  contemporary  French 
history.  So  that,  apparently,  nothing  of  contem- 
porary note  lay  outside  the  dramatic  range. 

Perhaps  more  eloquent  than  all  these  complaints 

1  Cf.  Hey  wood,  Apology  for  Actors  (1612). 


8         SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

and  prohibitions,  however,  was  the  action  of  the 
Government  in  imprisoning  three  of  the  most 
popular  playwrights  for  offence  given  by  alluding 
on  the  stage  to  one  of  Scottish  extraction,  high  in 
Royal  esteem.  Chapman  and  Marston  had  in- 
serted in  their  comedy,  Eastward  Hoe,  notices  of 
public  matter  couched  '  in  wicked  and  libellous 
vein  ' ;  and  for  this  they  suffered,  and  Jonson  with 
them.  Further  official  action  was  taken  against 
Jonson  when  he  was  called  before  the  Council  to 
answer  for  his  Sejanus.1  Sir  John  Yorke  was  also 
fined  by  the  Star  Chamber  for  having  allowed  a 
play  to  be  acted  in  his  house  embodying  *  many 
foul  passages  to  the  vilifying  of  our  religion/ 
And  later  still,  Middleton  was  imprisoned  for  his 
flagrantly  topical  Game  of  Chesse.  So  that  the 
authorities  were  painfully  convinced  of  the  evi- 
dence of  the  topical  element  on  the  stage. 

But  at  times  such  allusions  found  grace  in  the 
official  eye.  As  a  rule,  those  at  the  head  of 
affairs  disliked  the  holding  up  of  matters  of  high 
import  for  the  approval  or  disapproval  of  the 
'  many-headed.'  Circumstances,  however,  could 
arise  in  which  those  who  ought  to  have  seen,  would 
be  diplomatically  preoccupied,  and  would  possess 
no  eye  for  this  class  of  delinquency.  A  case  in 
point  arose  in  1592,  when  certain  players  were 
suffered  to  jest  at  Philip  of  Spain,  '  in  order  to 

1  See  Jonson's  Conversations  with  Drummond. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY        9 

make  him  odious  unto  the  people.' 1  The  law 
again  winked  conveniently  when  James  of  Scotland 
was  known  to  be  making  overtures  to  the  odious 
Philip.  Unpleasant  allusions  were  certainly  made 
at  this  time  to  the  Scottish  monarch,  whose  faulty 
diplomacy  had  brought  him  under  England's 
frown  ;  for  news  came  post-haste  from  Edinburgh 
of  the  displeasure  with  which  James  had  heard  of 
the  personal  topic  employed  at  that  time  by  the 
London  comedians.2 

To  the  Elizabethan  mind,  then,  the  abiding  pre- 
sence of  allusive  matter  on  the  contemporary 
stage  was  beyond  dispute.  It  had  won  alike  the 
Royal  frown  and  the  Royal  approval.  It  had 
been  the  subject  of  mild  remark  between  mild 
correspondents.  It  had  amused  the  groundlings, 
imprisoned  dramatists,  and  stung  foreign  digni- 
taries into  making  protestations. 

If  further  proof  were  needed  that  the  Eliza- 
bethan age  found  its  reflection  on  the  contem- 
porary stage,  it  would  be  visible  in  the  statements  of 
the  dramatists  themselves,  in  the  titles  of  some  of 
their  plays,  in  the  existence  of  certain  allusions 
of  a  character  beyond  dispute,  embedded  here  and 
there  in  these  plays,  and  in  certain  other  consider- 
ations to  be  mentioned  hereafter. 

1  Verstegen  (1592). 

2  Cf.  Letter  from  John  Chamberlaine  to  Winwood  (i8th   Dec. 
1604).     Cam.  Soc.,  1861. 


io      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

The  dramatists  were  evidently  of  opinion  that 
it  lay  within  their  province,  that  it  was  inevitably 
connected  with  their  craft — this  use  of  the  topical 
device. 

Shakespeare  is  explicit.  The  '  purpose  of 
playing '  was  to  show  the  time  '  his  form  and 
pressure.' l  His  actors  were  to  be  '  the  abstract  or 
brief  chronicles  of  the  time.'2  And  these  were 
principles  which  his  plays  illustrated,  to  a  degree 
perhaps  not  altogether  suspected  by  the  great 
dramatist  himself. 

Lyly  was  consistently  inexplicit ;  but  he  seems 
to  hint  at  the  same  intention.  He  who  lived  in 
allegory  and  breathed  Euphuism,  had  still  to 
retain  a  touch  of  mystery  even  when  he  would  be 
making  a  confidence.  *  There  liveth  none  under 
the  sun/  he  wrote  in  his  Prologue  to  Endymion, 
'  that  knoweth  what  to  make  of  the  Man  in  the 
Moon.'  But  apparently  there  lived  those  who 
thought  they  could  ;  and  who  could,  withal,  only 
read  an  unpleasant  interpretation  into  it.  At  all 
events,  in  the  Epilogue  to  the  same  play  he  had 
already  found  it  convenient  to  claim  the  Queen's 
protection  against  'the  malicious  that  sought  to 
overthrow  him  with  threats.'  The  sound  of 
cudgels  seems  to  lurk  behind  the  lines — the 
cudgels  of  offended  personality.  And  it  seems 
therefore  to  be  no  far-fetched  conclusion,  that 

1  Hamlet,  in.  ii.  21.  2  Ibid.,  11.  ii.  530. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      n 

Lyly  had  shadowed  forth  in  the  play  some 
domestic  or  political  drama  of  the  day,  and  that 
his  careless  chuckle  in  the  Prologue  was  nothing 
less  than  a  covert  statement  to  his  age  of  this 
underlying  intention,  of  which  he  lived  to  repent 
him — as  early  as  the  Epilogue. 

Of  further  significant  utterances  by  the  drama- 
tists, there  is  one  by  Jonson.  Nothing  probably 
points  more  conclusively  to  a  vogue  than  its 
caricature.  And  when  the  author  of  Bartholomew 
Fair  sarcastically  alludes  in  the  Induction  of  that 
play  to  '  the  politic  picklocks  of  the  scene,'  who 
make  it  the  business  *  to  search  out  who  was 
meant  by  the  ginger-bread  woman,  the  hobby- 
horse man,  and  the  costard-monger/  he  lights  up 
an  excess,  but  he  also  does  more.  He  proves  the 
frequency  with  which  his  contemporaries  were 
wont  to  look  for  such  topical  allusions  in  the 
plays  which  the  age  presented  to  them. 

Besides  these  statements,  more  or  less  direct, 
of  a  topical  intention,  there  is  also  certain  evidence 
of  a  more  indirect  character,  pointing  however 
in  the  same  direction.  The  titles  themselves  of 
some  of  the  plays  point  conclusively  to  a  con- 
temporary appetite  for  such  fare. 

The  Famous  History  of  the  Life  and  Death  of 
Captain  'Thomas  Stukely,  and  the  Battle  of  Alcazar, 
would  naturally  attract  those  whose  memories 
went  back  to  the  year  1578,  or  who  could 


12      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

recollect  the  stirring  events  of  1589  and  Don 
Antonio.  The  Massacre  of  Paris  would  call  up 
a  fateful  evening  of  1572  ;  Bartholomew  Fair,  that 
annual  English  scene  of  revelry,  credulity,  and 
vice.  Plays  like  Bussy  d'Ambois  and  the  Tragedy 
of  B iron  would  remind  the  English  public  of 
stormy  scenes  enacted  in  their  own  time  beyond 
the  narrow  seas  :  while  John  van  Olden  Barnaveldt 
was  a  play  whose  subject  came  piping-hot  from 
the  Low  Countries. 

Sometimes  the  contemporary  item  would  take 
a  lowlier  tone,  as  when  some  of  the  domestic 
tragedies  that  darken  every  age,  crept  on  to  the 
stage.  'The  most  tragical  and  lamentable  murther 
of  Master  George  Saunders  of  London,  merchant, 
nigh  Shooters  Hill:  consented  unto  by  his  owne 
wife,  etc.,  was  a  typical  example  of  the  class. 
Episodes  such  as  these  would  nowadays  drift 
naturally  into  newspaper  channels  ;  but  then  it 
was  the  stage  that  caught  them,  and  the  Yorkshire 
Tragedy,  Arden  of  Fever  sham,  The  Woman  killed 
with  Kindness,  and  the  Fair  Maid  of  Bristol  (all 
turning  on  crimes  of  recent  date),  show  with  how 
keen  a  relish  popular  audiences  were  wont  to 
witness  the  most  lugubrious  crimes  of  their  day, 
represented  again  in  their  grimy  detail. 

Then  again,  the  most  casual  reader  of  the 
dramatists  is  constantly  alighting  on  words  and 
phrases  which  are  undoubted  reminiscences  of 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY       13 

Elizabethan  life,  and  which  stand  out  clearly  in 
their  context,  unmistakable  as  they  are  significant. 
Brownists  and  Puritans,  the  Cotsols  and  Ber- 
moothes,  Moorditch  with  its  melancholy,  and 
St.  Paul's  with  its  walks,  theatres  and  actors, 
justices  and  beadles,  hobby-horses  and  loggats, 
village-greens  and  ale-houses, — with  each  and 
every  one  there  lingers,  as  they  lie  embalmed  in 
the  pages  of  the  dramatists,  something  of  that 
glowing  life  which  they  were  wont  to  breathe 
when  Chelsea  was  yet  a  village,  and  but  one 
bridge  spanned  a  lovely  Thames. 

In  addition,  the  great  popularity  of  the  Eliza- 
bethan plays  in  their  own  age,  coupled  with  the 
great  after-decline  in  that  popularity,  also  seems 
to  lend  additional  evidence  as  to  the  existence  of 
this  topical  element.  If  the  popularity  of  Shake- 
speare, for  instance,  in  his  own  day  simply  rested 
upon  an  adequate  appreciation  of  his  poetical 
genius,  the  intellectual  fibre  of  the  people  must 
have  declined  to  an  alarming  extent  in  the  genera- 
tions immediately  succeeding.  For  with  his  own 
age  passed,  for  a  time  at  least,  much  of  his 
popularity.  Even  allowing  that  the  Elizabethan 
atmosphere  was  conducive  to  poetical  apprecia- 
tion, the  fact  of  his  extraordinary  popularity  is 
not  sufficiently  accounted  for.  And  unless  the 
hypothesis  of  a  decline  in  English  intellectual 
stamina  is  accepted,  the  natural  inference  seems  to 


i4      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

be,  that  to  his  contemporaries  the  plays  of  Shake- 
speare presented  certain  features  which  chained 
their  interest,  but  which  in  a  few  decades  became 
dead  matter  to  the  general.  And  there  is  nothing 
more  likely  to  correspond  to  an  influence  of  this 
description  than  that  of  topical  matter. 

The  self-centred  character  of  the  age,  too,  lends 
additional  probability  as  to  the  presence  of  such 
contemporary  matter  in  the  drama  of  the  day. 
We  are  all  better  pleased  at  seeing  our  neighbours 
derided  than  at  witnessing  the  comic  distresses  of 
some  extraneous  personages.  Our  compassion  is 
more  readily  aroused  at  misfortunes  which  may 
to-morrow  befall  us,  than  at  all  the  impossible 
woes  of  all  the  heroes  and  heroines  since  the  days 
of  Agamemnon.  We  are  slow  to  discard  the 
age  from  our  thoughts.  But  a  people  brimming 
over  with  action  and  with  newly-found  life  would 
still  less  willingly  have  left  all  politics  and  gossip 
outside  the  doors  of  the  theatre.  Such  things 
were  an  integral  part  of  life  to  them,  and  it 
would  be  difficult  to  think  of  a  dramatist  woo- 
ing such  a  generation  for  immediate  success,  by 
addressing  himself  as  if  to  a  dispassionate  and 
disinterested  posterity  that  was  Hecuba  to  him. 
Something  of  that  outside  world  would  have  to  be 
conjured  up  on  the  stage,  and  the  poet  in  his 
highest  flights  would  have  to  remember,  every 
now  and  then,  to  touch  earth  once  again.  In  no 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      15 

age  probably  did  dramatic  writers  have  to  bow 
more  scrupulously  to  contemporary  feeling,  for 
in  no  age  had  there  existed  a  nation  more  wrapt 
up  in  self,  more  conscious  of  the  pride  of  race  and  of 
its  budding  glories.  *  Alas,'  said  Carlyle,  c  Shake- 
speare had  to  write  for  the  Globe  play-house  :  his 
great  soul  had  to  crush  itself  as  it  could  into  that 
and  no  other  mould/  The  ' Globe'  was  England; 
the  England  of  his  day  shaped  his  thoughts  and 
chose  his  topics.  No  wonder,  then,  if  much  that 
interested  his  contemporaries  could  be  read  in  his 
works. 

There  is  yet  one  more  consideration  which 
points  to  the  probability  of  the  presence  of  such 
allusions  in  Elizabethan  drama. 

In  the  Middle  Ages,  the  moralities  which  fostered 
the  English  drama  '  on  scaffolds  hye  '  had  exhibited 
the  tendency,  as  it  were,  in  embryo.  In  the  tragic 
as  in  the  comic  vein,  these  rough  presentations 
reflected  the  life  that  was  led  by  the  people ;  for 
the  audiences  that  gaped  on  rude  festival  plays  at 
Chester,  and  Coventry,  and  elsewhere,  soon  found 
their  counterparts  on  those  very  stages.  Artisan 
and  cleric  crept  on  to  the  scaffolding,  and  mor- 
alities became  oftentimes  accurate,  if  severe, 
portraits  of  notorious  figureheads,  such  as  the 
priest,  the  squire,  and  the  pardoner.  So  that 
even  at  this  early  date  it  seemed  that  a  popular 
stage  had  necessarily  to  reflect  the  popular  life. 


1 6      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

When  university  scholars  tried  to  revive  in 
England  the  classical  school  of  drama,  and  to  bring 
the  Roman  cothurnus  on  to  the  English  stage, 
the  sequel  only  proved  the  truth  of  this  same 
principle.  Their  close  imitation  of  Seneca  caused 
their  productions  to  be  merely  retrospective. 
Their  plays  wanted  national  interest,  and  the 
stage  that  chose  to  neglect  the  popular  life  soon 
collapsed  in  its  own  ruins.  Its  detachment  from 
things  of  the  day  had  completely  alienated  the 
sympathies  of  the  people. 

The  popular  drama,  on  the  other  hand,  which 
had  beheld  the  Senecan  type  both  rise  and  fall, 
instinctively  surrendered  itself  to  the  popular 
tendency.  It  reflected  spontaneously  contem- 
porary personalities,  current  opinions,  current 
events  ;  and  while  the  wooden  puppets  of  the 
scholars  were  being  consigned  to  an  obscurity 
not  altogether  undeserved,  the  popular  kind  was 
already  leaving  its  grub- stage  and  opening  out 
into  that  golden  creation  which  posterity  has 
named  the  Elizabethan  drama. 

It  is  difficult  to  think  that  the  English  drama, 
arrived  at  maturity,  would  scorn  those  very 
principles  which  had  successfully  led  it  from 
Chester  to  the  '  Globe,'  and  had  endowed  it  with 
a  surpassing  truth  and  virility.  Probability,  in 
fact,  points  to  a  directly  opposite  assumption,  and 
the  intimate  contact  which  the  early  stage  pre- 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      17 

served  with  real  life,  and  which  saved  it  from  the 
fate  of  more  scholarly  and  artificial  efforts,  was 
the  deciding  factor  in  the  growth  of  the  later 
drama,  and  the  underlying  principle  on  which  the 
great  creations  were  subsequently  built. 

There  must  have  existed,  then,  a  topical  element 
in  the  Elizabethan  drama.  Not  only  do  strong 
probabilities  point  that  way,  but  definite  evidence, 
external  and  internal,  run  in  the  same  direction. 
And  the  existence  of  these  allusions,  so  far  from 
being  unprecedented,  can  be  regarded  merely  as  the 
outcome  of  national  circumstances,  which  had  given 
rise  to  a  similar  phenomenon  on  the  eastern  shores 
of  the  Mediterranean  two  thousand  years  before. 

But  what  sometimes  makes  the  modern  accept- 
ance of  the  topical  tendency  difficult,  as  far  as 
Elizabethan  times  are  concerned,  is  the  fact  that 
the  tendency  is,  generally  speaking,  absent  from 
the  serious  stage  of  to-day.  The  '  Lyceum  '  does 
not  shadow  forth  the  day's  politics  of  personalities 
as  the  *  Globe '  is  said  to  have  done,  and  it  is  there- 
fore somewhat  difficult  to  allow  that  the  alleged 
references  to  local  and  national  events  and  person- 
alities did  actually  exist  in  the  earlier  drama. 

The  absence  of  the  topical,  however,  from  the 
stage  of  to-day  need  supply  no  argument  against 
its  employment  on  the  Elizabethan  one.  Its 
presence  in  the  one  case,  as  well  as  its  absence 
from  the  other,  is  due  to  a  difference  of 

B 


1 8       SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

contemporary  conditions,  a  difference  in  the  idea 
of  what  lies  within  the  dramatic  province.  And 
this  is  due  not  to  one  cause  alone. 

In  the  first  place,  more  than  one  institution  has 
relieved  the  stage  of  what  fell  to  its  lot  in  the 
old  days  ;  among  such  institutions,  journalism. 
Politics  since  then  have  fallen  on  to  the  more 
perfect  platform  of  the  newspaper,  and  if  a  con- 
venient medium  is  now  sought  for  the  utterance 
of  '  popular,  busy,  or  seditious  matter,'  the 
journalist  supplies  the  means.  So  it  has  come 
about  that  the  militant  statesman  is  now  no  longer 
hurried  across  the  stage  with  hunted  look  and 
matted  hair  when  his  policy  is  not  approved,  nor 
is  the  man  whose  voice  is  raised  in  the  street 
made  'a  May-game  of  on  the  stage.  Both  are, 
instead,  guillotined  by  the  newspapers. 

Then  again,  modern  Art  is  taken  more  gravely 
than  in  the  breezy  days  of  Drake  and  his  Devon- 
shire sea-dogs.  Modern  sensations  are  not 
willingly  mingled ;  and  art  and  polemics  were 
never  good  playfellows.  Hence  the  latter-day 
divorce  between  the  drama  and  the  topical,  be- 
tween the  artistic  and  what  must  be  often  little 
more  than  jarring  and  commonplace. 

The  differing  character  of  the  respective  audi- 
ences, too,  goes  for  something.  In  Elizabethan 
times  the  topical  allusion  was  a  needed  stimulant 
and  attraction;  for  English  art  was  yet  in  its 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY       19 

infancy,  and  it  had  to  work  out  its  own  salvation 
cautiously,  not  forgetting  the  material  tendency 
of  the  age.  Art,  pure  and  undefiled,  would  as 
yet  have  scarcely  attracted  sufficient  patrons,  and 
it  was  in  response  to  the  requirements  of  the  time 
that  the  dramatic  art  became  modified,  by  the 
injection  of  some  of  that  very  age  into  its  com- 
position. With  the  dawn  of  a  greater  sensibility, 
the  topical  stimulant  became  unnecessary,  and  the 
precept  which  made  Art  self-sufficient  was  born. 

To  our  modern  ways  of  thinking,  moreover, 
there  is  something  derogatory  about  the  term,— 
topical  element.  A  place  is  denied  it  in  the 
Elizabethan  drama,  on  the  ground  that  Shakespeare 
and  his  fellows  would  not  have  stooped  to  employ 
such  a  device  for  recommending  their  art,  as  to 
mingle  something  of  the  age  with  it.  But  genius 
has  never  been  wont  to  avoid  the  market-place. 
The  Roman  Terence  held  nothing  that  was  human, 
alienate.  And  to  state  that  Shakespeare  for  one 
readily  adapted  himself  to  the  fashions  of  his  day, 
is  neither  to  indict  his  genius  of  being  gravelled 
for  lack  of  argument,  nor  to  brand  him  as  a 
charlatan  who  adulterated  his  wares  for  purposes 
of  sale.  When  Tallis  and  Byrd  made  '  music 
and  sweet  poetry  agree  '  in  their  exquisite  chamber 
recitals,  the  dramatists  followed  suit  by  arranging 
for  the  marriage  of  music  to  words  on  the  stage. 
And  the  vogue  thus  begun  was  afterwards  respon- 


20      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

sible  for  such  things  as  the  Silvia  lyric  and  the 
'Tempest's  sea-dirge.  There  is  no  difficulty  in 
conceiving  the  adoption  of  the  one  fashion.  It 
should  be  no  harder  to  imagine  the  adoption  of 
that  other,  which  concerned  itself  with  the  topical. 
All  the  more  because  the  business  faculties  of  the 
greatest  of  the  dramatists  have  been  placed  beyond 
doubt.  He  who  could  prosecute  a  man  at  law  for 
a  trifling  amount,  even  while  his  soul  was  groan- 
ing with  the  birth  of  a  *  Lear,'  was  surely  not  one 
to  refuse  to  adopt  a  contemporary  fashion,  in  itself 
not  inconsistent  with  artistic  sensibility,  and  which 
seemed  to  be  the  one  thing  to  confer  upon  his 
efforts  that  contemporary  success,  which,  more  than 
academic  glory,  was  the  aim  and  end  of  his  writing. 
To  call  the  topical  tendency  a  fashion  of  the 
age  of  Elizabeth,  as  far  as  the  drama  is  concerned, 
is  not  to  overstate  the  case,  or  to  exaggerate  things 
as  they  really  were.  It  is  true  that  what  has 
hitherto  been  garnered  of  a  topical  nature  from  that 
great  dramatic  field  is  but  fractional,  and  to  some 
minds  almost  accidental,  in  the  total  output  of 
dramatic  matter.  And,  therefore,  at  first  sight  it 
seems  quite  out  of  proportion  with  what  might 
reasonably  have  been  expected  from  a  general 
tendency  of  the  time.  But  harvest  results  do  not 
always  represent  the  actual  crop.  Time  with  his 
sickle  has  been  busy  among  the  Elizabethan  plays. 
As  in  other  realms  of  production  only  the  fittest 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      21 

have  survived,  and  as  they  were  not  always  those 
plays  in  which  contemporary  allusions  were  most 
apparent  or  plentiful,  such  survivors  are  naturally 
limited  in  number.  Often  indeed,  as  might  be 
expected,  many  purely  topical  plays  lasted  not  a  day 
longer  than  that  which  beheld  them  produced,  and 
they  passed  away  almost  simultaneously  with  the 
events  which  called  them  into  being.  This  is  one 
reason  why  the  evidence  as  to  the  existence  of 
the  topical  tendency  is  more  truncated  than  would 
be  expected  assuming  the  tendency  to  have  been 
general. 

Then,  too,  such  allusions  were  but  coyly  put 
forth,  and  so  would  be  often  lost.  Sometimes 
they  avoided  paper  altogether  ;  were,  in  fact, 
'  extemporally  staged,'  as  Cleopatra  predicted 
would  be  her  fate  at  the  hands  of  the  quick 
comedians.  At  others,  they  were  quite  covert  in 
their  nature,  like  those  which  Master  John 
Lyly  so  cunningly  wrapped  up  in  his  Endymion 
Prologue.  The  pillory  and  the  cropping  of  ears 
both  conduced  to  this  shyness  of  setting  down 
plain  allusions.  But,  for  whatever  reason,  this 
reluctance  did  undoubtedly  exist,  and  hosts  of 
allusions  which  floated  over  the  Elizabethan  stage, 
recognised  by  all  spectators,  have  been  lost,  either 
through  want  of  place  in  the  acting  version,  or 
through  the  ultra-ingenuity  of  the  witty  masters. 

In  many  cases,  of  course,  want  of  knowledge 


22      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

on  the  part  of  the  modern  critic  must  also  curtail 
the  evidence.  The  lack  of  acquaintance  with  all 
the  minutix  of  contemporary  history  must  often 
prevent  allusions  being  read,  where  they  undoubt- 
edly existed  for  the  rudest  and  most  unlettered 
Elizabethan :  and  until  a  more  complete  equation 
of  history  with  the  drama  is  obtained,  these 
allusions  will  continue  to  be  passed  over. 

So  there  is  more  than  one  reason  why  any 
collection  of  such  allusions,  in  the  present  state 
of  Elizabethan  scholarship,  could  not  assume  to 
be  representative  of  the  actual  output.  And  it 
is  only  reasonable  to  insist  that,  in  deciding  on 
the  probability  or  otherwise  of  a  prevalent  topical 
tendency  in  the  days  of  Elizabeth,  the  appraiser 
should  remember  the  section  which  Time  has 
submerged,  and  which  ignorance  passes  over. 

It  has  been  said  that  many  allusions  have  been 
undoubtedly  lost  through  the  lack  of  modern 
acquaintance  with  the  sixteenth  and  seventeenth 
century  conditions.  But  modern  ingenuity  has, 
in  some  instances,  done  its  best  to  supply  the 
deficiency,  in  a  way,  however,  that  can  only  add  to 
the  confusion.  The  loosest  of  bridles  has  often 
been  given  to  Fancy  as  it  galloped  through  the 
Elizabethan  drama  in  search  of  allusions ;  with 
the  sole  result,  however,  of  a  ludicrdus  spoil,  which 
the  smallest  ray  of  good  sense  has  been  able  to 
dissolve.  That  amiable  critic  who  read  his 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      23 

Tennyson  at  a  time  of  inspiration  and  saw  that 
the  In  Memoriam,with  'its  touching  lines,  evidently 
came  from  the  full  heart  of  the  widow  of  a  mili- 
tary man/  unconsciously  illustrated  the  dangers 
of  accepting  Fancy  as  a  guide  in  literary,  or  in- 
deed any,  tracts.  It  is  easy  to  transfer  personal 
fancies  and  personal  wishes  into  works  of  a  de- 
signedly simple  character.  And  this  is  a  caution 
which  needs  to  be  borne  in  mind  in  deciding  on 
allusions,  lest  results  may  be  obtained  of  fabric  as 
shadowy  as  ever  Cowper  saw  in  his  fire  at  twilight. 
The  fact  is  that  all  possible  allusions  must  be 
considered  not  from  a  fanciful,  a  personal,  or  a 
modern  standpoint,  but  only  and  entirely  from 
the  Elizabethan  one.  The  contemporary  audience 
must  be  the  touchstone.  The  stage  must  ever  be 
viewed  through  those  quaint  horn  spectacles  which 
Elizabethans  used,  for  the  Elizabethan  mind  is 
the  only  key  that  can  surely  unlock  the  details  of 
that  topical  feature  of  the  drama  which  presented 
so  many  attractions  to  the  age.  And  before  this 
Elizabethanism  can  be  attained  it  will  be  necessary 
to  drench  oneself  thoroughly  in  the  hopes,  the 
aspirations,  and  temper  of  the  time  ;  not  the 
hopes  of  the  Queen  and  her  counsellors  alone,  but 
of  the  commonalty  as  well.  Local  events  and 
personalities  must  be  known  as  well  as  those  that 
played  a  national  part,  and  when  this  historical 
desideratum  has  been  obtained,  which  is  certainly 


24      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

not  yet,  then  will  the  investigation  of  what  is 
allusive  proceed  from  an  absolutely  safe  basis. 

Besides  insisting  on  the  necessity  for  deciding 
the  genuineness  or  otherwise  of  Elizabethan 
allusions  solely  from  Elizabethan  planes,  there 
is  yet  another  caveat  to  be  mentioned,  and 
it  is  one  which  one  Phil  Kynder,  as  far  back 
as  1656,  thought  it  wise  to  emphasise.  The 
extraordinary  must  not  be  held  to  typify  the 
ordinary,  and  the  above  writer  was  at  pains  to 
deprecate  any  future  attempt  at  making  '  all 
England  in  ages  past  a  Bartholomew  Fair/  or  to 
draw  *  the  condition  of  all  Elizabethan  women  out 
of  Shackespeare's  Merry  Wifes  of  Windsor/ 
Such  an  attempt  will  appear  to  many  to  stand 
self-condemned ;  but  there  must  have  been  some 
cause  for  Kynder 's  statement  in  his  own  day,  and 
it  is  a  fault  that  has  not  always  been  avoided  since, 
though  the  instances  that  have  occurred  were 
scarcely  such  flagrant  breaches  as  he  was  pleased 
to  instance. 

It  might  be  noticed  in  addition,  however,  that 
the  same  writer  sees  fit  to  laugh  at  the  idea  of  re- 
creating a  past  age  from  that  age's  literature. 
He  considers  it  idle  work,  '  the  moulding  up  a 
piece  of  antiquity ' ;  and  thinks  it  impossible  to 
extract  from  the  literature  of  a  country  *  the 
general  character  and  customs  of  that  country/ 
But  this  is  the  very  question  to  which  the  present 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      25 

chapter  has  attempted  to  give  some  reply. 
Not  only  do  various  strong  probabilities  go  to 
confute  what  he  says,  but  (and  this  seems  more 
to  the  point)  a  goodly  array  of  significant  his- 
torical facts  as  well.  The  available  data  may  be 
smaller  in  quantity  than  might  be  expected,  but 
neither  this  nor  any  antecedent  improbability  as 
to  the  existence  of  such  genuine  data  can  furnish 
a  negative  of  any  strength.  Just  as  it  was  pos- 
sible to  paint  the  picture  of  Athens  from  the 
Attic  drama  (on  Plato's  own  showing),  so  can 
Shakespeare's  England  be  recovered  again  from 
the  Elizabethan  plays.  It  only  remains  to  ap- 
preciate the  colouring  and  to  catch  the  forms,  for 
the  full  life  of  which  these  dramas  are  the  silent 
witnesses  to  be  restored  again.  The  author  of 
our  most  scholarly  work  on  English  dramatic 
literature  held  that  the  Elizabethan  age  would  have 
remained  isolated  from  its  successors  *  had  not 
its  dramatic  literature,  with  a  vividness  beyond  the 
reach  of  any  other  literary  form,  transmitted  its 
own  picture  of  itself  to  posterity.1  And  so  ade- 
quate does  this  picture  appear  to  be,  that  one 
would  fain  indulge  the  fancy  that  the  sun,  which 
smiled  on  the  city  and  also  into  its  roofless  theatres, 
had  caught  the  fashions  from  the  streets,  and 
thrown  them  on  to  the  stage,  for  the  amusement 
of  that  age  and  the  enlightenment  of  posterity. 

1  See  Dr.  Ward's  English  Dramatic  Literature,  i.  269. 


CHAPTER    II 

ON   PARTICULAR  ALLUSIONS  OF  THE   ELIZABETHAN 
STAGE 

*  /  am  always  inclined  to  believe  that  Shakespeare  has  more  allusions 
to  particular  facts  and  persons  than  his  readers  commonly  suppose! — 
DR.  JOHNSON. 

IN  entering  upon  the  task  of  collecting  material 
which  shall  throw  light  upon  the  age  of  Shake- 
speare, the  first  thing  that  strikes  one  is  the  fact 
that  the  material  divides  itself,  roughly  speaking, 
into  two  main  classes — the  one  containing  allusions 
of  a  particular  kind,  which  connect  themselves 
with  definite  events,  personalities,  and  opinions  ; 
the  other  comprising  more  general  allusions,  which 
relate  to  no  particular  figures  or  events,  but 
represent  rather  broad  types  and  general  charac- 
teristics. 

The  first  section,  the  '  particular,'  appear  to  be 
intentionally  made.  Their  insertion  seems  to  be 
nothing  less  than  the  dramatist's  response  to  the 
age's  craving  for  a  topical  stimulant.  Those  of  a 
<  general '  kind,  on  the  other  hand,  seem  to  be  more 
casually  inserted.  Often,  indeed,  their  presence 


2G 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      27 

seems  merely  due  to  an  unconscious  effort  on 
the  part  of  the  dramatist.  But  they  are,  despite 
their  seemingly  casual  insertion,  inevitable  in  their 
appearance.  They  are,  in  reality,  as  necessary  to 
the  verisimilitude  of  the  drama  as  shadow  to  sun- 
light, and  are  equally  indispensable  in  filling  up  the 
age's  picture. 

The  c particular'  allusions,  as  contrasted  with 
the  c  general,'  appear  at  first  sight  to  be  the  more 
important  as  a  class,  just  as  the  deciphering  of  a 
hidden  personality  seems  of  more  weight  than  the 
notice  of  a  custom.  The  former,  too,  is  the  class 
over  which  labour  and  ingenuity  have  been  the 
more  abundantly  spent,  oftentimes  to  the  almost 
entire  neglect  of  the  c  general '  kind.  Yet  the  latter 
is  the  class,  which  contains  the  essentials  of  the  age. 
c  Particular '  allusions  often  do  little  more  than 
glance  at  the  age,  and  present  its  accidents  and 
idle  excrescences.  Both,  however,  are  necessary. 
A  particular  incident  may  point  to  a  widely  spread 
custom.  A  general  custom  may  light  up  an 
individual.  So  that  if  the  picture  of  the  age  is  to 
be  adequate  and  complete,  as  far  as  the  present- 
day  scholarship  permit,  not  only  are  the  curious 
and  occasional  detail  to  be  filled  in,  but  the 
permanent  background  as  well. 

The  intention  of  the  present  chapter  concerns 
itself  solely  with  direct  references  to  personalities 
and  events  contained  in  the  Elizabethan  drama. 


28      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

Such  references  will  be  seen  to  cover  a  large  field, 
for  there  seems  scarcely  any  department  of  Eliza- 
bethan life  which  is  not  represented. 

It  has  been  already  seen  that  matters  of  high 
import  were  often  dragged  on  to  the  English  stage, 
in  spite  of  Royal  prohibitions.  Elizabeth  and  her 
successor  were  often  alluded  to,  sometimes  from  a 
desire  to  panegyrise,  at  other  times  in  a  spirit  of 
hostile  criticism.  The  poets  and  wits  also  came 
in  for  their  share  of  notice,  and  just  as  in  the  case 
of  the  sovereigns,  these  notices  are  valuable  inas- 
much as  they  illustrate  the  temper  of  the  age  and 
the  sentiments  of  the  individual.  Curious  political 
shreds,  too,  were  often  appearing  before  the  foot- 
lights, and  these,  pieced  together,  will  give  some 
notion  of  current  opinion.  Passing  events  in  their 
flight  would  sometimes  cast  shadows  upon  the  stage, 
and  these  have  the  virtue  of  occasionally  corro- 
borating, in  the  freshest  of  ways,  historical  records, 
when,  indeed,  they  do  not  supplement  them. 
Even  news  from  beyond  the  seas  found  at  times 
a  publicity  on  this  same  English  stage,  and  such 
narratives  are  scarcely  ever  without  some  signifi- 
cance as  to  the  national  attitude  towards  neigh- 
bouring peoples,  or  as  to  the  success  of  national 
enterprise  abroad. 

The  contemporary  drama  will,  in  this  way, 
supply  the  key  to  much  that  was  contemporary, 
and  peculiar  to  the  age.  To  bring  out  these 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY       29 

peculiarities  is  the  utility  from  the  modern  stand- 
point of  the  c  particular  '  allusion. 

In  an  age  like  the  one  under  present  discussion, 
when  euphuistic  flowers  were  strewed  about  in 
rich  profusion,  it  would  not  unnaturally  be  ex- 
pected that  the  same  luxury  of  language  would 
distinguish  courtly  allusions  made  in  the  drama. 
Dedications  were  invariably  couched  in  honeyed 
superlatives,  and  a  neat  tongue  at  court  availed 
more  than  a  quick  sword.  But  this  notwith- 
standing, a  splendid  moderation  characterises 
nearly  every  compliment  paid  on  the  stage  to 
the  reigning  sovereign,  and  this  is  not  unworthy 
of  notice.  It  could  not  have  been  an  obtuseness, 
a  tardiness  in  nature,  that  led  to  this  moderation 
on  the  part  of  the  dramatists,  for  they  were, 
when  they  willed,  creators  of  kings  who  trod  the 
boards  with  regal  dignity.  Nor  could  it  have  been 
an  unwillingness  to  bend  the  pregnant  hinges  of 
the  dramatic  knees.  Possibly  it  was  because  they 
were  merely  reproducing  the  tempered  courtesy 
of  the  people  towards  the  Crown,  undazzled  as 
they  were  by  the  glare  of  the  Court.  From 
whatever  cause,  however,  sprang  their  moderation 
in  tributes  addressed  to  the  throne,  their  allusions 
were  marked  in  consequence  by  a  saneness  that 
makes  them  the  more  valuable  as  evidence. 

The  most  familiar  allusion  to  the  Virgin  Queen 
will  occur  to  all.  The  famous  allegory  known  as 


30      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

Oberon's  Vision  in  the  Midsummer  Night's  Dream 
undoubtedly  refers  to  the  splendid  revels  of  the 
Court  held  at  Kenilworth  early  in  the  Queen's 
reign.  There  Leicester  made  a  last  desperate 
attempt  to  win  the  hand  of  his  queenly  votaress, 
wrapped  in  '  maiden  meditation,  fancy  free.' l 
How  the  proud  Earl,  as  c  Cupid  all  armed/ 
fluttered  undecidedly  between  his  love  for  the 
Queen  (c  the  cold  moon/  c  that  fair  vestal  throned 
in  the  west ')  and  the  Countess  of  Sheffield  ('  the 
Earth '),  and  how  Cupid's  bolt  fell  at  last  upon 
the  Countess  of  Essex  (that  '  little  western 
flower,  Before  milk-white,  now  purple  with 
love's  wound ') — all  this  is  a  tale  which  Scott 
has  told  in  part,  and  is  Shakespeare's  most  direct 
allusion  to  the  Court  life  of  the  haughty  Queen. 
It  is  a  particular  reference  to  a  well-known 
incident,  and  it  enshrines  not  only  her  love  for 
Royal  progresses,  but  also  for  the  complimentary 
Masque. 

The  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor  contains  another 
direct  allusion,  where  Mrs.  Anne  Page  invokes  a 
blessing  upon  Windsor  Castle.2  But  in  generosity, 
this  passage  lags  far  behind  the  one  in  Henry  VIII. 
where  it  is  foretold  that 

4  She  shall  be  loved  and  feared :  her  own  shall  bless  her. 
Her  foes  shall  shake  like  a  field  of  beaten  corn, 

1  See  Midsummer  Night's  Dream,  n.  ii.  98  ff. 

2  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor ;  v.  v.  60  ff. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      31 

And  hang  their  heads  with  sorrow : 

Many  days  shall  see  her, 
And  yet  no  day  without  a  deed  to  crown  it.' 1 

In  addition  to  these,  in  Locrine  she  is  compli- 
mented on  having  reigned  for  eight-and-thirty 
years ;  in  Bussy  d'Ambois,  Guise  says  of  the 
English  Court,  that  they  make 

'  of  their  old  Queen 
An  ever-young  and  most  immortal  goddess'  ;2 

and  Greene,  in  more  conventional  strain,  had 
already  issued  another  prophecy.  '  Diana's  rose  ' 
should  receive  the  homage  of  '  Apollo's  heliotrope, 
and  Venus*  hyacinth,  of  Juno's  gilliflowers,  and 
Pallas'  bay,  and  Ceres'  carnation.' 3  Antiquity's 
best  and  brightest  were  to  pale  before  England's 
future  Queen. 

Towards  the  end  of  her  reign,  however,  tongues 
were  beginning  to  wag  on  what  was  called  the 
Queen's  decline  in  might  and  majesty.  Then 
Jonson  gallantly  stood  by  her,  and  in  his  Cynthia  s 
Revels  he  makes  her  proudly  say,  '  We  are  no  less 
Cynthia  than  we  were,'4  and  therein  claims  for 
her,  her  ancient  greatness  and  power  undiminished. 
The  sympathies  of  the  people  for  the  Virgin 
Queen,  even  when  death  had  claimed  her,  were 
certainly  not  buried  with  her.  After  her  day 

1  Henry  VIII.,  v.  iv.  30  ff.  3  friar  Bacon,  ad  fin. 

2  Chapman,  Bussy  D'Ambois,  act  I.          4  Cynthia  s  Revels,  v.  iii. 


32      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

her  early  difficulties  are  related  again  in  Hey- 
wood's  Troubles  of  Queen  Elizabeth.1  The  thorny 
path  that  had  led  her  to  the  throne,  is  called  to 
mind,  and  the  triumphs  of  the  dead  Queen  seemed 
only  the  greater  for  that  happy  perspective,  in 
which  the  lapse  of  a  few  years  had  placed  them. 

Other  allusions  to  the  same  exalted  personage 
have  from  time  to  time  been  suggested  by  modern 
readers  of  Elizabethan  drama.  It  has  been 
thought  that  in  Lady  Macbeth,  Shakespeare  in- 
tended the  theatre-going  audiences  of  James'  reign 
to  behold  their  former  Queen  lightly  shadowed. 
This  involves  the  supposition  of  a  prevalent  senti- 
ment, contrary  to  that  inferred  from  Heywood's 
play.  But  it  is  not  impossible  that  the  two 
sentiments  may  have  been  held  by  different 
sections  of  the  community,  and  at  all  events,  there 
is  something  to  be  said  for  this  last  suggestion. 
In  Lady  Macbeth's  treatment  of  the  kinsman  who 
was  both  sovereign  and  guest,  the  dramatist 
designedly  drew,  to  all  appearance,  a  parallel  to 
Elizabeth's  behaviour  towards  the  Scottish  Mary. 
The  parallelism  is  continued  in  the  fact  that  the 
sovereignty  in  each  instance  passed  to  the  son  of 
the  murdered  monarch,  and  though  this  may  seem 
nothing  more  than  an  unavoidable  coincidence, 
the  frequent  additions  made  to  the  Chronicle 
account  in  building  up  the  play,  seem  to  point  to 

1  Otherwise  called  If  you  kntnv  not  me. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      33 

some  such  purpose  in  the  play.  The  points  of  like- 
ness may  seem  obscure  at  this  point  of  time,  but  the 
probability  is  that  they  were  more  than  sufficient 
to  awaken  the  imagination  of  the  audience  at  a 
time  when  the  gossips  had  not  yet  left  off  talking 
about  the  release  of  Southampton,  that  ardent 
friend  of  Mary's.  And  if  the  popular  imagination 
was  capable  of  any  response,  it  would  probably 
soon  arrive  at  Shakespeare's  intentions,  whether 
they  connected  themselves  with  Queen  Elizabeth, 
or  merely  with  the  recital  of  a  weird  piece  of 
northern  history.  Elsewhere,  others  have  seen  in 
Portia's  review  of  her  suitors  1  an  allusive  com- 
pliment to  the  much-wooed  Queen.  Others 
have  held  that  it  was  the  beautiful  auburn  hair 
of  the  Queen  (usually  displayed  in  an  open 
Italian  caul)  that  was  praised  when  chestnut 
was  declared  to  be  '  ever  the  only  colour.' 2 
If  these  allusions  seem  far-fetched,  they  must 
yet  not  be  lightly  dismissed.  What  may  have 
been  to  a  contemporary  a  palpable  hit  may 
seem  to-day  wide  of  the  mark,  and  it  is  in  such 
cases  as  these  that  the  Elizabethan  equation  is 
most  necessary. 

Besides  these  passing  allusions  to  the  Maiden 
Queen,  her  personality  broods  over  plays  where 

1  Merchant  of  Venice,  i.  ii. 

2  As  You  Like  It,  in.  iv.  125  cf.  also  Two  Gentlemen  of  Verona, 
iv.  iv.  191. 

C 


34      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

her  footsteps  are  not  seen.  Her  reign,  its  polity 
and  temper,  to  some  extent  permeate  the  Shake- 
spearean histories,  and  allusions  arise  from  the  text 
like  misty  forms,  somewhat  vague  but  none  the 
less  coherent.  The  histories  are,  in  fact,  a  mirror 
of  the  time.  They  reflect  contemporary  under- 
currents, and  in  them  the  dramatist  sings  a  chorus 
to  his  age. 

There  were  numerous  reasons  why,  in  the  days 
of  Elizabeth,  occasional  sullen  murmurs  of  dis- 
content should  have  existed  among  the  people  : 
and  it  is  some  of  these  murmurs  which  rise  at 
intervals  from  the  Shakespearean  history.  The 
Queen  never  ran  directly  counter  to  what  she 
knew  to  be  the  strongest  wishes  of  her  people. 
But  points  of  difference  were  bound  to  arise  from 
such  causes  as  her  fondness  for  favourites,  or  her 
approval  of  Burleigh's  subterfuges  for  oppressing 
the  country  by  unjust  taxation.  Her  policy  of 
expediency  was  heartless.  It  made  her  last  word 
unstable,  and  as  Camden  said,  *  it  often  caused  her 
to  knowingly  abandon  innocent  persons  under 
accusation.'  She  was  her  father's  child,  and  there 
was  not  a  little  personal  tyranny  and  jealousy  in 
her  dealings  with  the  Queen  of  Scots,  with  Essex 
and  Southampton.  So  that  it  must  needs  have 
been  that  the  realm  contained,  among  those  who 
thought,  some  who  complained,  and  it  is  some- 
thing of  this  popular  disquietude  which  is  re- 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY       35 

vealed  with  fitting  dignity  in  the  allusive  tone  of 
these  histories. 

While  the  power  of  Leicester  yet  lived  in  the 
memory,  and  while  'grievous  exactions'  were 
being  '  generally  imposed  upon  the  people,' *  then 
does  the  dramatist  throw  off  his  studies  of  polity 
in  Henry  VI.  and  Richard  //.,  whereby  he  illus- 
trated how  weak  sovereigns  could  be  led  to  ruin 
by  evil  advisers  and  indulgence  in  unjust  taxation. 
When  the  country  suffered  impatiently  under  the 
subterfuges  of  Burleigh,  then  comes  the  play  of 
Richard  III.,  in  which  the  scheming  tyrant,  furthered 
by  corrupt  nobles,  is  overthrown  by  righteous  re- 
bellion. When  plots  and  machinations  threatened 
to  revive  the  days  of  Throgmorton  and  Babington ; 
when  the  Papists  held  out  their  hands  across 
the  water  to  Philip  of  Spain  and  the  Duke  of 
Mayenne,  then  does  the  dramatist  in  King  John 
and  Henry  VI.  expose  the  miseries  of  foreign 
intervention  even  when  supported  by  the  justest 
of  revolts.  The  play  of  Henry  V.  is  partly  a 
political  placard  for  Essex  and  his  friends,  whose 
success  Shakespeare  would  have  viewed  with  such 
enthusiasm,  but  it  also  demonstrates  how  righteous 
and  great  achievement  would  overwhelm  in  the 
Elizabethan  mind  all  outlying  questions  relating 
to  succession.  And  in  Henry  VIII.y  when  his 
hopes  for  Essex  were  dashed,  he  draws  a  sombre 

1  Verstegan  (1592). 


36      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

picture    of   Royalty  leaning    on   the    support   of 
extortionate  lawyers  and  unscrupulous  clerics.1 

But  besides  thus  echoing  definite  contemporary 
complaints,  these  plays  also  sound  notes  of  pride 
and  patriotism,  which  in  their  intensity  are  almost 
peculiar  to  Elizabeth's  reign.  In  King  John  the 
Protestant  self-reliance  is  powerfully  exhibited ;  in 
Henry  V.  and  Richard  II.  Elizabethan  patriotism 
is  taken  to  divine  heights.  The  majesty  and 
dignity  of  old  Gaunt's  tribute  to  '  the  precious 
stone  set  in  the  silver  sea,' 2  the  haughty  defiance 
of  Faulconbridge  on  behalf  of  the  England  that 

*  Never  did,  nor  never  shall 
Lie  at  the  proud  foot  of  a  conqueror ' : 3 

these  things  represent  only  that  fire  which  Elizabeth, 
with  all  her  faults,  had  infused  into  the  nation. 

Incidentally,  too,  Henry  V.  enunciates  a  definite 
political  plea  which  could  not  have  been  at  that 
time  confined  to  the  dramatist's  brain.  It  was  a 
plea  for  unity  :  unity  among  the  four  English- 
speaking  nationalities,  and  unity  among  the 
English  themselves.  The  play  has  representatives 
of  the  four  countries  fighting  side  by  side  under 
one  flag,  and  for  the  same  end.  The  question  of 
consolidation  was  in  the  air  when  the  play  was 
being  written.  Ireland,  so  it  was  thought,  was 

1  Cf.  R.  Simpson,  *  Politics  of  Shakespeare's  Historical  Plays' 
(Shak.  Soc.  Trans.,  1874). 

2  Richard  II.,  n.  i.  46.  3  King  John,  v.  vii.  112. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      37 

being  pacified  by  Essex.  Wales  was  already 
united,  and  the  probability  of  union  with  Scotland 
had  already  become  apparent  from  the  considera- 
tion of  James's  claims  to  the  English  crown. 

The  need  for  national  unity,  on  the  other  hand, 
had  been  obvious  from  the  earlier  years  of  Eliza- 
beth's reign.  But  this  need  was  a  doctrine  which 
required  constant  formulating  on  account  of  the 
many  difficulties  that  presented  themselves.  The 
faith  of  some  Englishmen  seemed  to  beckon 
them  to  Spain,  and  a  choice  seemed  to  be  offered 
between  creed  and  country.  Elizabeth  must  have 
often  said,  at  least  in  effect,  to  her  people :  <  Be 
friends,  you  English  fools,  be  friends  :  we  have 
French  quarrels  enow,  if  you  could  tell  how  to 
reckon/ l  And  to  the  general  acceptance  of  this 
counsel  must  be  referred  that  unanimous  closing 
up  of  English  ranks  for  the  great  effort  of  '88. 
But  such  advice  from  the  stage  was  not  given  only 
by  Shakespeare.  The  writer  of  Gorboduc,  too,  had 
made  his  protest  against  discord.  He  had  advised 
his  hearers  to  choose  the  one  for  sovereign  '  upon 
whose  name  the  people  rest,'  whether  it  was  c  by 
means  of  native  line '  or  c  by  the  virtue  of  some 
former  law/ 

'  Such  one  prefer  and  in  no  wise  admit 
The  heavy  yoke  of  foreign  governaunce.' 2 

All    this   had    a    tremendous   meaning    before 

1  Henry  P.,  iv.  i.  221.  2  Gorboduc,  v.  2, 


3 8      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

Shakespeare  was  born.  The  Queen,  then,  was 
scarcely  settled  on  her  throne  before  foreign 
princes  were  suing  for  her  hand,  and  nothing  but 
national  unity  seemed  to  be  able  to  save  the 
country  from  confusion.  Well  might  the  modern 
critics  say  that  Gorboduc  had  political  intentions. 
And  this,  if  true,  would  lend  probability  to  similar 
readings  in  what  Shakespeare  wrote. 

There  will  be  noticed  in  these  historical  plays 
a  frequent  rearrangement  of  fact  and  alteration  of 
motive  in  the  history  dealt  with.  And  this  lends 
undoubted  colour  to  the  supposition  that  Shake- 
speare had  in  some  slight  measure  adapted  them 
to  his  age,  that  he  had  rounded  off  the  past  to 
resemble  his  present. 

In  Henry  VI.  Suffolk  is  certainly  made  to 
approach  Leicester  in  character  to  a  degree  not 
warranted  by  historical  records.  For  Suffolk's 
enclosure  of  the  common  at  Milford  and  his 
treatment  of  the  petitioners1  are  events  that  cannot 
be  otherwise  than  identified  with  Leicester's  tak- 
ing of  '  whole  forests,  woods,  and  pastures  '  to 
himself,  and  then  having  the  discontented  claimants 
hung.2  *  Enclosures  .  .  .  make  fat  Beasts  and 
leane  poore  people,7  wrote  a  contemporary,  and 
this  forms  a  comment  on  this  very  incident.8 

In  King  John  the  historical  quarrel  against  John 

1  Cf.  2  Henry  A7.,  i.  iii.         2  Leicester's  Commoirwealthy  pp.  61-72. 
3  Cf.  R.   Simpson,  *  Politics  of  Shakespeare's  Historical  Plays' 
(Shak.  Soc.  Trans.,  1874). 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY       39 

as  a  tyrant  is  changed  into  one  against  him  as 
a  usurper,  doubtless  to  make  the  position  coincide 
with  that  of  Elizabeth  ;  for,  as  is  well  known, 
interested  foreign  opinion,  and  to  some  extent 
native  opinion,  held  her  title  to  be  defective. 

John's  wars  are  also  abridged  so  as  to  typify 
Elizabeth's  troubles.  The  first  was  represented 
as  on  behalf  of  his  title  ;  the  second  as  against 
the  Pope  and  his  agents.  It  may  have  been 
dramatically  advisable  to  abridge  the  wars,  but  it 
cannot  be  said  that  it  was  absolutely  necessary  so  to 
abridge  them  as  to  make  them  fall  exactly  into  line 
with  the  two  main  struggles  of  Elizabeth's  reign.1 

Similarly,  in  the  manipulation  of  the  history 
connected  with  Henry  IV. ,  three  risings  are 
reduced  to  two,  and  apparently  for  reasons  similar 
to  those  already  mentioned.  The  first  war  is 
again  ascribed  to  secular  motives ;  in  the  second, 
ecclesiastical  influences  are  at  work.2 

So  that,  in  this  uniform  treatment  of  historical 
fact,  in  these  rearrangements  of  the  past  by 
Shakespeare,  there  were  intended  to  be  read,  in 
all  probability,  portrayals  of  his  present,  definite 
pronouncements  of  his  own,  or  at  all  events  of  the 
people,  on  current  events  and  politics.  Thus  was 
the  shadow  of  Elizabeth  and  her  reign  over  the 
dramatist  as  he  wrote. 

To  the  great  Queen's  successor  many  allusions 

1  Cf.  R.  Simpson,  'Politics  of  Shakespeare's  Historical  Plays' 
(Shak.  Soc.  Trans.~T.%74).  2  Ibid. 


40      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

were    also    made,  from  which  something   of  his 
personality  and  policy  can  easily  be  gleaned. 

The  happy  and  fortunate  union  of  the  crowns 
of  Scotland,  England,  and  Ireland  under  James  is 
hinted  at,  when  the  horrified  Macbeth,  in  that 
witch-haunted  cavern,  beholds  the  slow  procession 
of  the  line  of  kings,  and  among  the  descendants 
of  c  blood-bolter'd  Banquo  '  some  '  that  twofold 
balls  and  treble  sceptres  carry/ l  This  same  union 
is  also  touched  upon  in  King  Lear,  where  the  word 
English  is  supplanted  by  that  of  *  British '  in  the 
wording  of  the  '  Childe  Rolande  '  ballad.2 

There  can  also  be  no  doubt  that  the  'most 
miraculous  work  '  of  good  King  Edward  the  Con- 
fessor, as  described  in  Macbeth^  his  curing  of 
'  strangely-visited  people,  all  swoln  and  ulcerous/ 3 
was  meant  as  a  tribute  to  the  prince  who  boasted 
that  the  touching  for  the  king's  evil  was  the 
'  healing  benediction  '  bequeathed  to  him  by  pre- 
ceding royalty.  Perhaps  the  King's  ungracious 
behaviour  towards  the  crowd  which  received  him 
on  his  state  entry  into  England  is  respectfully 
explained  and  touched  with  dignity,  when  in 
Measure  for  Measure  the  Duke  professes  to  dis- 
like staging  himself  before  the  people  he  loves. 
He  did  not  relish  'their  loud  applause  and  Aves 
vehement,' 4  and  to  him  '  the  obsequious  fondness  ' 

1  Macbeth,  iv.  i.  121.  2  King  Lear,  in.  iv.  185. 

3  Macbeth,  iv.  iii.  150.  4  Measure  for  Measure^  I.  i.  70. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      41 

of  £  untaught  love  ' l  did  appear  offence.  It  has 
been  suggested  that  the  prototype  of  Prospero  is 
to  be  found  in  this  same  King,  imbued  as  he  was 
with  sorcerer's  love.  But  this  seems  far-fetched  ; 
for  between  the  puffy  monarch  who  wrote  a  book 
on  Demonology  and  the  lonely  wizard  of  that 
Mediterranean  isle  there  lies  a  great  way. 

Like  Elizabeth,  however,  James  was  glorified 
by  prophecy  after  the  event  in  Henry  VIII.  When 
Heaven  had  called  England's  Queen  'from  this 
cloud  of  darkness/  then  was  to  reign  one  who, 
'  like  a  mountain  cedar,'  should  '  reach  his 
branches  to  all  the  plains  about  him.' 

'  Wherever  the  bright  sun  of  heaven  shall  shine, 
His  honour  and  the  greatness  of  his  name 
Shall  be,  and  make  new  nations.'2 

One  of  the  first  acts  of  James's  reign  had  been 
the  taking  of  the  Lord  Chamberlain's  players 
into  his  own  service  as  the  King's  players,  so  that 
somewhat  happy  relations  probably  existed  be- 
tween throne  and  stage.  It  must  be  confessed, 
however,  that  the  picture  above  is  overdrawn, 
unless  indeed  colonial  enterprise  is  hinted  at ;  but 
even  then  it  flatters. 

The  stage,  however,  could  also  criticise  the 
royal  conduct,3  and  in  a  play  called  The  Faithful 

** Measure  for  Measure,  n.  iv.  29. 

2'  Henry  HIL,  v.  iv.  52. 

3  See  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Faithful  Friends,  i.  i. 


42      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

Friends,  the  royal  weakness  for  favourites  is 
thrown  on  the  screen.  *  Alexander  the  Great/ 
says  the  dramatist,  '  had  his  Hephaestion,  Philip 
of  Spain  his  Lerma,'  and  then  adds  cautiously 
but  significantly  : 

'  not  to  offend, 

I  could  produce  from  Courts  that  I  have  seen 
More  royal  precedents.'     (i.  i.) 

James's  lavish  distribution  of  knightly  honours 
in  1604  also  comes  in  for  frequent  criticism,  and, 
it  may  be  added,  ridicule.  This  throwing  about 
of  titles  must  have  caused  no  little  annoyance  to 
those  who  laid  store  by  such  things ;  envy,  too,  to 
those  who  could  not  own  to  having  been  per- 
sonally concerned.  So  that,  allusions  to  this  one 
among  the  kingly  foibles  were  none  the  less 
powerful  for  being  backed  by  general  opinion. 

c  These  knights  will  hack ' 1  (i.e.  become  hack- 
neyed), said  Mrs.  Ford,  with  no  little  confidence,  in 
the  Merry  Wives  ;  and  she  advises  in  consequence 
her  good  friend  Mrs.  Page  not  to  alter  her  title 
of  mere  gentility. 

In  Eastward  Hoe  James's  '  thirty  pound  knights ' 
are  more  than  once  ridiculed  in  the  character  of 
Sir  Petronel,  '  knight  adventurer  ' ;  and  this  is  the 
play  that  contains  the  sneer  which  stung  Sir 
James  Murray  so  badly  and  caused  the  imprison- 
ment of  the  dramatists  concerned.2 

1  Merry  Wives,  n.  i.  51.        2  Drummond's  Conversations,  pp.  20  ff. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      43 

The  invasion  of  northerners,  Which  James 
tended  to  encourage,  was  a  standing  grievance 
with  the  English  people,  both  high  and  low  ;  and 
when  Seagull  in  this  play  describes  the  Scots  as 
great  friends  to  England  '  when  they  are  out  on 't,' 
he  is  no  doubt  echoing  a  general  sentiment,  and 
one  is  irresistibly  reminded  of  the  pungent  satire 
for  which  England's  great  Doctor  was  afterwards 
responsible. 

But  if  the  King's  domestic  conduct  was  not 
exempt  from  dramatic  comment,  neither  was  his 
foreign  polity.  In  Middleton's  Game  of  Chess,  c  a 
very  scandalous  comedy/  as  one  courtly  writer  l 
deemed  it,  will  be  found  a  more  exact  reflec- 
tion of  contemporary  English  diplomacy  and  the 
nation's  comment  on  the  same  than  will  be  found 
elsewhere  in  the  whole  range  of  the  native  drama. 

This  comedy,  '  in  which  the  person  of  his 
Majesty  had  been  represented  in  a  rude  and  dis- 
honourable fashion,'  according  to  the  courtly  one 
already  mentioned — this  comedy  has  been  well 
described  as  approaching  most  nearly  to  the 
Aristophanic  conception  of  the  topical  uses  of 
comedy.2  Although  the  veil  of  allegory  was 
thrown  over  his  sentiments  by  the  playwright, 
the  actors'  forms  are  none  the  less  visible  under- 
neath, and  the  allegorical  device,  like  fine  drapery, 

1  Secretary  Conway  in  a  letter  to  the  Privy  Council,  1624. 

2  Cf.  Dr.  Ward,  English  Dramatic  Literature,  ii.  536. 


44      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

only  accentuated  and  vivified  the  forms  which  lay 
below. 

The  comedy  took  the  stage  just  after  war  had 
been  declared  against  Spain,  that  is  in  1624.  It 
owed  its  being  to  the  fact  that  the  Spanish 
marriage — that  scheme  which  James  had  nursed 
so  zealously — had  fallen  through.  Young  Charles 
and  Buckingham  had  visited  Madrid  to  no  pur- 
pose, greatly  to  the  joy  of  the  English  people  ; 
and  when  Middleton  openly  rejoiced  that  the 
proposed  alliance  had  fallen  through,  he  knew  that 
he  voiced  the  nation. 

In  the  Game  of  Chess  James  is  the  White  King, 
and  he  is  portrayed  as  completely  under  the  influ- 
ence of  Count  Gondomar,  the  Spanish  emissary. 
Plain  colours  were  everywhere  in  the  play  used 
by  the  dramatist.  The  White  Knight  is  Prince 
Charles,  the  White  Duke,  Buckingham,  the  White 
King's  Pawn,  probably  Sir  Toby  Matthew,  who  in 
1623  had  gone  to  Madrid  as  the  Prince's  adviser. 

The  invective,  however,  was  mainly  reserved 
for  the  black  party,  that  of  Spain,  and  above  all 
for  the  minister  Gondomar.  The  Fat  Bishop 
was  meant  to  hit  off  Antonio  di  Dominis,  a 
notorious  convert  from  Rome  to  Protestantism, 
who  was  after  his  conversion  made  Dean  of 
Windsor  by  James.  He  is  ridiculed  as  *  a  greasy 
turncoat  gormandising  prelate/  From  the  picture 
of  Gondomar  no  single  effort  was  withheld.  The 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      45 

malady  with  which  he  was  afflicted  is  mentioned. 
The  very  litter  which  his  malady  made  necessary, 
too,  is  represented.  He  is  made  to  allude  to  the 
English -Algerian  expedition  of  1620,  which  he 
had  so  cunningly  brought  about : 

*  from  the  White  Kingdom,  to  secure  our  coasts 
Against  the  infidel  pirate,  under  pretext 
Of  more  necessitous  expedition.' l 

He  is  also  represented  as  glorying  over  the  part 
he  had  played  in  inducing  James  to  release  the 
imprisoned  Catholics  of  1622,  when  he 

'  made  the  jails  fly  open  without  miracle, 
And  let  the  locusts  out,  those  dangerous  flies, 
Whose  property  is  to  burn  corn  without  touching.' 

With  such  faithfulness  of  detail  were  the  figures 
drawn.  The  royal  polity,  moreover,  was  laid 
bare  in  so  merciless  a  fashion,  that  were  there 
no  other  available  material  for  constructing  the 
history  of  this  epoch,  it  could  easily  be  drawn  in 
part  from  this  single  play  of  Middleton's.2 

Except  with  reference  to  the  sovereigns,  Court- 
allusions  are  not  common  in  the  Elizabethan  drama. 
Though  many  men  of  title  were  of  material 
assistance  at  different  times  to  the  actor  and  his 
craft,  the  homage  in  return  for  such  help  was  paid 
elsewhere  and  by  other  means  than  in  the  drama. 

The  personality  of  Essex  was  the  one  which 

1  Cf.  Game  of  Chess ;  in.  i. 

2  Cf.  Dr.  Ward,  English  Dramatic  Literature,  ii.  524  ff. 


46      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

attracted,  on  the  whole,  the  greatest  number  of 
allusive  notices.  In  the  first  place  there  is  the 
somewhat  affectionate  allusion  in  Shakespeare's 
Henry  V.  to  '  the  general  of  our  gracious  Empress/ 
who  might  in  good  time  be  '  from  Ireland  coming, 
bringing  rebellion  broached  on  his  sword/ *  This 
was  at  the  period  when  Essex  stood  in  the  sun. 
Later,  when  the  shadows  fell  upon  him,  allusions 
to  him  became  correspondingly  sad  and  gloomy. 
He  is  called  Actason  in  Cynthia  s  Revels?  and  the 
presumption  which  marked  his  dealings  with  the 
Queen,  together  with  its  doleful  end,  is  pointed  to. 
In  Macbeth  the  behaviour  of  the  Thane  of 
Cawdor  corresponds  in  almost  every  circumstance 
with  that  of  Essex,  and  it  is  not  impossible  that 
behind  the  dramatic  personality  the  historical  one 
is  lightly  shadowed.  '  Treasons  capital,  confessed 
and  proved/ 3  overthrew  Cawdor.  The  repentance 
of  Essex,  his  confession  and  petition  for  forgive- 
ness, form  a  parallel.  Nothing  in  Cawdor's  life 
'  became  him  like  the  leaving  of  it.'  The  end  of 
Essex  was  one  of  noble  dignity.  Perhaps,  too, 
it  is  Essex  who  is  hinted  at  when  Hero  speaks 
to  Margaret  in  Much  Ado  About  Nothing,  of 

*  favourites, 

Made  proud  by  princes,  that  advance  their  pride 
Against  that  power  that  bred  it.'  4 

1  Henry  V.,  v.  Chorus,  30.         2  Cf.  Cynthia  s  Revels,  v.  3. 

3  Macbeth,  i.  iii.  115.  4  Much  Ado  About  Nothing,  in.  i.  9. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      47 

Perhaps,  too,  it  is  Elizabeth's  ring  to  Essex  on 
his  departure  for  Cadiz  which  is  alluded  to  in 
All's  Well.  Such  an  idea  may  well  have  crossed 
the  minds  of  the  audience  who  knew  of  the  gift. 
On  the  other  hand,  the  scorn  poured  on  Puri- 
tanism in  the  play  seems  a  little  inconsistent  with 
that  assumption.1 

It  would,  however,  almost  seem  as  if  the  mind  of 
Shakespeare  found  some  strange  attraction  in  the 
deeds  and  fate  of  the  impetuous  and  unfortunate 
Earl.  As  far  back  as  1589,  when  Essex  had  been 
sent  to  France  with  4000  English  volunteers,  the 
incident  seemed  to  have  given  direction  to  the 
dramatist's  workings ;  for  soon  afterwards  he 
develops  an  interest  in  French  politics,  and  writes 
his  Loves  Labour 's  Lost.  In  the  outline  sketch  of 
that  humane  idealist  Brutus,  as  we  see  him  in  Julius 
C<esar,  there  also  seems  some  added  memories  of 
Essex.  Proud  Essex  had  boasted  of  keeping  his 
heart  from  baseness.  He  had  questioned  in  a 
letter  to  Egerton  whether  '  an  earthly  power 
or  authority '  could  be  infinite  :  like  Brutus,  he 
knew  c  no  personal  cause  to  spurn  at  the  exacting 
and  autocratic  sovereign  but  for  the  general. ' 2 
Strangely  akin  was  this  Elizabethan  in  his  single- 
ness of  mind  and  purity  of  motive  to  the  lofty 
Stoic,  who,  like  him,  violated  intimate  ties  of  affec- 

1  See  Fleay's  Life  of  Shakespeare,  p.  218. 

2  Julius  Ctesar,  11.  i.  12. 


48      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

tion  for  the  public  well-being.  It  seems  hard  to 
say  that  Shakespeare's  Roman  derived  no  single 
touch  in  his  making  from  that  Earl  who  was 
the  cynosure  of  all  English  eyes  at  the  time.1 

To  that  other  noble  figure  which  towered 
above  its  peers  in  the  realms  of  Elizabeth,  namely 
Leicester,  the  allusions  are  fewer,  but  scarcely  less 
significant.  The  part  he  played  at  Kenilworth  in 
bidding  for  the  royal  hand  has  already  been 
touched  upon.  But  Lyly  had  previously  sketched  a 
chapter  out  of  Leicester's  romance  in  his  Endymion, 
a  play  which  is  really  a  glorified  version  of  that 
Earl's  restoration  to  royal  favour,  after  his  secret 
marriage  with  Lettice,  Countess  of  Essex,  and 
after  his  confinement  in  Greenwich  Castle  in 
consequence.  Endymion  (who  of  course  is 
Leicester),  after  slumbering  away  forty  years,  is 
awakened  by  Cynthia's  kiss  (Cynthia  being  the 
Queen).  He  forthwith  proceeds  to  relate  his 
experiences  ;  and  after  the  recital,  his  marriage 
is  condoned,  and  reconciliation  with  the  Queen 
and  goddess  follows.  This  happy  result  had 
been  brought  about  partly  by  the  good  offices 
of  one  Eumenides ;  and  this  latter  personage 
has  been  identified  with  Sussex  on  no  less  an 
authority  than  that  of  Camden,  '  lantern  unto 

1  See  also  R.  Simpson's  paper,  *  The  Political  use  of  the  stage  in 
Shakespeare's  time,1  for  the  political  bearing  of  Thomas  Heywood's 
Royal  King  and  Loyal  Subject,  etc. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      49 

late  succeeding  age.'  Leicester  is  also  hinted  at 
in  unmistakable  terms  in  the  Yorkshire  Tragedy, 
where  it  states  that 

'  The  surest  way  to  charm  a  woman's  tongue 
Is — break  her  neck :  a  politician  did  it.'     (Sc.  v.) 

This  is  undoubtedly  an  allusion  to  the  fateful 
story  of  Amy  Robsart,  Leicester's  first  wife,  at 
Cumnor  Hall. 

With  somewhat  less  certainty  has  the  figure  of 
Burleigh  been  suggested  as  the  original  of  the 
Polonius  portrait.  The  '  wretched  rash  intruding 
fool/  with  his  trite  maxims  and  pompous  ex- 
pressions, is  indeed  a  comic  and  overcharged 
study.  But  there  seems  just  a  probability,  not- 
withstanding, that  he  is  a  study  of  that  antiquated 
politician  whom  the  Lord  High  Admiral  styled 
'  an  old  greybeard  with  a  white  head.'  Burleigh's 
perpetual  interference  and  euphuistic  pomp  of 
speech,  which  find  a  parallel  in  the  Polonius 
portrait,  were  far  from  popular  features  in  a 
minister ;  while  the  advice  of  the  aged  Dane 
to  his  son  in  the  play — advice  founded  on  the 
most  utilitarian  precepts — as  well  as  his  effete 
maxims,  would  have  come  with  equal  verisimilitude 
from  the  English  statesman,  for  the  fluctuating 
policy  and  economical  tricks  of  the  latter  were 
prompted  by  similar  motives.  Even  Burleigh's 
hostility  to  the  stage  and  the  stage's  consequent 
hostility  to  him  are  hinted  at,  when  Hamlet 


50      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

recommends  Polonius  cto  see  the  players  well 
bestowed/  and  *  to  let  them  be  well  used/  for 
fear  of  ill  report  during  his  life.1 

With  regard  to  Southampton,  whose  figure 
looms  large  in  that  age  of  patronage,  a  possible 
reference  seems  to  occur  in  Shakespeare's  dedica- 
tory notices  to  his  two  great  narrative  poems. 
In  these  dedications  a  note  of  honest  affection  can 
be  heard  sounding  above  all  the  ornate  language 
with  which  the  poet  decorated  his  notice  like  so 
much  fanciful  arabesque.  This  liberal  patron  of 
arts  and  letters  had  shown  the  young  playwright 
'honourable  disposition/  but  it  is  doubtful  whether 
he  is  to  be  considered  as  being  the  beautiful  youth 
who  lurks  in  the  background  of  so  many  of  the 
Sonnets.  Indeed,  it  is  doubtful  whether  any 
tribute  to  his  patron  ever  left  the  poet's  pen  as 
it  told  of  men  and  matters,  though  it  has  been 
suggested  that  a  faint  compliment  to  Southampton 
is  intended,  where  the  garrulous  old  nurse  in 
Romeo  and  Juliet  will  not  allow  that  Romeo's 
name  begins  with  R.  That  letter  she  describes 
as  the  dog's  name  'which  burreth  in  the  sound.'2 
It  would  be  remembered  that  Southampton's 
family  name  was  Wriothesley ;  so  the  nurse's 
certainty  as  to  the  initial  letter  being  the  more 
auspicious  one  may  possibly  have  called  up  the 

1  Hamlet,  n.  ii.  528. 

2  Romeo  and  Juliet,  n.  iv.  212.     Cf.  Johnson's  Grammar. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      51 

Wriothesley,  who  was  certainly  at  that  time  the 
poet's  patron.  The  suggestion,  perhaps,  derives 
some  faint  increase  of  probability  from  the  fact 
that  to  other  critics  the  whole  play  seems  to 
allude  to  the  delays  that  hindered  Elizabeth 
Vernon's  marriage  with  this  very  Wriothesley. 

What  is  perhaps  the  noblest  figure  of  them  all 
has  yet  to  be  noticed.  It  would  be  pleasant  to 
think  that  Sidney,  the  courtier,  the  soldier,  and 
the  scholar,  that  purest  of  Elizabethan  souls,  who 
could  dream  Arcadias  and  adorn  Death  itself,  was 
successful  in  finding  an  epitaph  in  the  lines  of  the 
great  bard.  But  here  again  the  point  is  not 
certain.  Though  Ophelia's  description  of  Hamlet 
as 

4  The  expectancy  and  rose  of  the  fair  state, 

The  glass  of  fashion  and  the  mould  of  form ; 

The  observed  of  all  observers/  l 

would  be  singularly  applicable  to  this  many-sided 
and  cultured  Sidney,  no  definite  assertion  can  be 
made,  though  possibly  that  notable  form  was  float- 
ing in  the  dramatist's  mind  as  he  wrote. 

The  prototype  for  another  creation  of  Shake- 
speare's, however — that  of  Benedick — has  been 
suggested  in  the  person  of  Pembroke,  another 
brilliant  patron  of  letters.  The  witty  fastidious- 
ness and  the  rooted  objection  to  marriage  of  the 
Elizabethan  courtier  find  a  true  counterpart  in 

1  Hamlet ,  in.  i.  159. 


52      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

the  caustic  wit  and  strange  indifference  of  the 
young  Paduan ;  and  it  is  more  than  possible  that 
the  dramatist  was  sketching  from  life  when  he 
added  this  portrait  to  his  gallery.  The  sugges- 
tion which  has  been  made,  that  Sir  Nicholas  Bacon 
is  represented  in  the  immortal  figure  of  Falstaff — 
because  both  were  fat — can  hardly  be  taken  seri- 
ously.1 It  was  Mr.  Swinburne  who  satirically 
made  out  a  case  for  seeing  the  hoary  Burleigh 
under  the  disguise  of  Romeo  ! 

Of  more  or  less  definite  allusions  to  persons  of 
rank,  there  remains  yet  one  to  be  noticed,  and 
that  has  reference  to  Arabella  Stuart.  This  lady, 
descended  from  Margaret  Tudor,  and  niece  of 
Lord  Darnley,  towards  the  end  of  Elizabeth's 
reign  was  induced  to  allow  her  claims  to  the 
English  crown  to  be  asserted.  Accordingly 
Jonson  in  his  Cynthia  s  Revels 2  impeaches  her  as 
a  '  swoln  Niobe,'  for  presuming  farther  than  did 
even  Actaeon  (Essex).  With  this  slight  reference 
the  allusions  to  Elizabethan  dignitaries  seem  con- 
cluded. Flying  references  occur  here  and  there, 
but  they  come  '  scant  of  breath '  and  scarcely  bear 
enumerating.  Those  which  have  been  given  are 
perhaps  not  always  too  clear  in  outline.  But  this 
one  point  cannot  be  doubted  :  that,  underlying 

1  See  Notes  and  Queries,  jrd   Series,  HI.   83,    105 ;    quoted   by 
Mr.  S.  Lee. 

2  See  Cynthia's  Revels,  v.  3. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      53 

the  dramatic  treatment  of  Shakespeare,  of  Lyly, 
and  Jonson,  to  mention  no  others,  there  lies  a 
tendency  to  reflect  particulars  of  the  age,  parti- 
culars relating  to  court  intrigues,  and  probably 
the  characteristics  of  some  of  England's  most 
favoured  sons. 

Allusions  made  by  the  dramatists  to  their  own 
brother  wits  are  not  without  significance  as  to  the 
relations  of  the  individuals  of  the  literary  tribe, 
one  to  another.  Some  of  them  are  critical  notices, 
some  satirical  and  even  abusive.  Others  spring 
from  literary  courtesy,  and  from  that  genuine 
admiration  not  always  found  among  artists. 

Shadowing  the  whole  intercourse  of  the  drama- 
tists was  a  thinly  disguised  controversy  which  ran 
through  a  series  of  plays,  chiefly  through  those  of 
Jonson,  Marston,  and  Dekker,  but  which,  accord- 
ing to  some,  invaded  the  Shakespearean  works 
as  well.  This  controversy,  like  that  which  had 
affected  religious  parties  a  decade  or  so  earlier 
(that  of  Marprelate),  and  like  that  earlier  contro- 
versy between  dramatists  supposed  to  be  hidden 
in  the  early  English  comedy,  Damon  and  Pithias, 
advanced  the  cause  of  neither  party  of  disputants, 
and  otherwise  resembled  the  earlier  controversies 
in  its  extreme  vigour  and  abandon. 

The  immediate  cause  of  its  outbreak  may  have 
been,  perhaps,  the  absurd  tragedy  of  Marston's 
called  Antonio  and  Mellida,  a  thing  of  bombast  and 


54      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

vapourings.  It  may  possibly  have  been,  as  others 
maintain,  the  much-vexed  question  of  children- 
actors.  But  what  is  most  probable  is  that  it  was 
the  jeering  character  of  Crysoganus  in  Marston's 
Histriomastix,  which  was  obviously  an  attack  on 
Jonson.  And  Jonson,  moreover,  is  known  to 
have  written  to  Drummond  to  the  effect  that  his 
quarrels  with  Mars  ton  arose  from  the  latter' s 
representation  of  him  on  the  stage.  But  which- 
ever may  have  been  the  real  cause,  the  man  who 
could  handle  Nature,  even  in  her  wintriest  moods, 
so  clumsily  as  to  say,  as  Marston  did,  that 

*  The  rawish  dank  of  clumsy  winter  ramps 
The  fluent  summer's  vein  :  and  drizling  sleet 
Chilleth  the  wan  bleak  cheek  of  the  numb'd  earth  ; 
Whilst  snarling  gusts  nibble  the  juiceless  leaves 
From  the  nak'd  shudd'ring  branch  : 1 

such  a  man  was  in  need  of  some  intellectual  atten- 
tion. And  this  Ben  Jonson  took  upon  himself  to 
give,  executing  private  revenge  in  what  appeared  to 
be  a  public  correction.  His  touch,  however,  was 
none  of  the  lightest,  nor  was  he  one  of  the  most 
tactful  of  men.  *  He  was  a  great  lover  and 
praiser  of  himself/  wrote  a  contemporary,2  *  a 
contemner  and  scorner  of  others  ;  given  rather 
to  losse  a  friend  than  a  jest,  and  thought  nothing 
well  but  what  either  he  himself  or  some  of  his 

1  Marston's  Antonio  and  Mellida,  opening  lines. 

2  See  Drummond's  Conversations. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      55 

friends  .  .  .  had  said  or  done.'  In  his  Every 
Man  out  of  His  Humour  he  had  already  embodied 
in  Clove's  fustian  much  of  Marston's  turgid 
vocabulary  of  Histriomastix,  and  so  blow  had  been 
given  for  blow.  But  in  his  next  play,  Cynthia  s 
Revels,  though  he  is  general  in  his  satire,  lashing 
as  he  did  the  general  undercurrent  of  bad 
literary  taste,  he  succeeded  in  obtaining  both 
Marston's  and  Dekker's  warmest  reprehension. 
Marston  must  have  felt  conscious  of  the  personal 
application  of  Jonson's  indictment  of  having 
'  penuriously  gleaned  wit  from  laundress  and 
hackneyman '  and  of  having  derived  some  of  his 
graces  '  with  servile  imitation  from  common 
stages,  ...  as  if  his  invention  had  lived  wholly 
upon  another  man's  trencher ' :  for  Marston  was 
a  plagiarist.  The  proper  sweetness  of  the  Muse, 
Jonson  had  significantly  added,  was  in  shunning 
cthe  print  of  any  beaten  path'  and  in  proving 
4  new  ways  to  come  to  learned  ears  ' — which  had 
not  been  Marston's  method.1 

This,  then,  was  the  first  episode  in  this  battle  of 
the  stage  :  Marston's  Histriomastix  or  Antonio  and 
Mellida,  the  casus  belli,  Jonson's  Every  Man  out 
of  His  Humour  and  his  Cynthia's  Revels,  two  sturdy 
rejoinders. 

The  next  was  of  Jonson's  initiative.  He 
apparently  wished  to  so  thoroughly  trounce  the 

1  See  Cynthia  s  Revels,  Induct. 


56      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

tripping  Marston  that  reply  would  be  out  of  the 
question,  and  so  his  Poetaster  was  hastily  put 
together  in  order  to  anticipate  any  response  from 
him  who  had  been  medicined.  It  is  possible  that 
in  the  meantime  Marston  got  in  a  faint  counter- 
blow. That  slight  thing  called  Jack  Drum's 
Entertainment,  said  to  contain  a  satirical  portrait 
of  Jonson,  was  possibly  of  Marston's  making. 
It  seems  to  have  been  regarded  by  Jonson  as  a 
retort,  for  he  evidently  saw  in  it  the  red  rag 
which  prompted  his  next  assault ;  and  in  the 
Poetaster  the  vocabulary  of  Crispinus  resembles 
and  satirises  the  vocabulary  of  this  play  in  a 
marked  degree. 

In  the  Poetaster1  Jonson  modestly  poses  as 
Horace  and  installs  Dekker,  who  by  this  time  was 
Marston's  champion,  in  the  character  of  Demet- 
rius, one  '  hired  to  abuse/  while  Marston  is 
Crispinus  the  defaulting  poet.  Horace  '  stands 
taxed  of  impudence,  self-love,  and  arrogance  by 
those  who  share  no  merit  in  themselves/  Demet- 
rius is  made  to  acknowledge  that  he  had  maligned 
Horace  for  no  other  reason  than  because  *  Horace's 
writings  had  thrived  better  than  his  own,  were 
better  liked  and  graced.'  The  poetaster  himself 
(Crispinus)  is  then  purged,  by  Horace's  pills,  of 
his  ventosity,  is  advised  to  shun  some  of  the 
ancients  but  to  read  the  best  of  them,  not  c  to  hunt 

1  See  v.  i. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      57 

for  wild  outlandish  terms/  not  to  entertain  chance 
foreign  phrases  which  neither  his  understanding 
nor  his  poor  tortured  verse  could  receive.  With 
these  and  other  admonitions  the  two  '  flat  grovel- 
ing souls '  (of  Marston  and  Dekker)  are  bound 
over  to  keep  the  peace,  and  are  dismissed  from 
Virgil's  court. 

In  reply  to  this  heavy  piece  of  slashing  by 
Jonson,  Dekker  undertook  to  c  untruss '  the 
c  humorous  poet/  and  the  untrussing  took  place 
in  his  Satiromastix.1 

Jonson's  painful  method  of  composition  is 
first  cleverly  satirised.  He  is  shown  in  his  study, 
surrounded  by  books  and  engaged  in  work  that 
smells  of  the  lamp.  He  is  credited  with  a  plenti- 
ful lack  of  real  inspiration,  and  beats  his  music  out 
finally  with  the  halting  subterfuges  of  a  quack. 

'  O  me  thy  Priest  inspire  ! 
For  I  to  thee  and  thine  immortal  name,' 

he  writes,  and  then  gets  into  difficulties  : 

'  In — in — in  golden  tunes 
For  I  to  thee  and  thine  immortal  name 
In — sacred  raptures  flowing  flowing, 

[swimming  swimming, 
In  sacred  raptures  swimming, 
Immortal  name,  game,  dame,  tame,  lame, 

[lame  lame. 
hath  shame,  proclaim,  oh 

1  See  in.  i. 


58      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

In  sacred  raptures  flowing,  will  proclaim,  not 

O  me  thy  Priest  inspire  ! 

For  I  to  thee  and  thine  immortal  name 
In  flowing  numbers  filled  with  sprite  and  flame. 
Good,  good,  in  flowing  numbers  filled  with  sprite 
and  flame.' 


After  this  clever  piece  of  satire,  Jonson's  vanity 
and  sourness,  his  stubbornness  and  perversity,  are 
all  attacked.  '  Thou  hast  such  a  villainous  broad 
back/  said  Dekker,  <  that  I  warrant  th'  art  able  to 
bear  away  any  man's  jest  in  England.'  And  in 
accordance  with  the  rules  of  the  literary  tourney 
of  the  day,  the  writer  of  the  Poetaster  has  person- 
alities flung  at  him,  and,  among  others,  the  brick- 
layer episode  of  his  life.  Thus  was  Jonson 
'untrussed.'  He  was  attacked  in  his  weak 
points,  and  this  episode  is  interesting  as  witness- 
ing to  the  contemporary  ideas  of  Jonson's  genius 
and  to  the  methods  of  attack  prevalent  among  the 
literary  men  of  the  day. 

But  this  controversy  to  all  appearances  did  not 
end  here.  Shakespeare  is  said  to  have  been 
embroiled  to  a  moderate  degree,  though  it  is 
easier  to  make  this  statement  than  to  prove  it. 

Shakespeare's  Troilus  and  Cressida  is  a  mysteri- 
ous play.  It  offers  many  harsh  disillusionings  of 
what  were  one's  preconceived  notions  of  the  great 
dramatist ;  and  for  this  very  reason,  however 
paradoxical  it  may  seem,  the  theory  of  his  partici- 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      59 

pation  in  the  controversy  is  more  tenable  than 
would  otherwise  have  been  possible.  He  who 
was  the  soul  of  chivalry  can  scarcely  be  credited 
with  wantonly  trampling  on  the  glories  of  Homer. 
It  is  equally  hard  to  think  of  him,  who  gave  life 
to  Cordelia,  fathering  a  Cressida.  So  that  the 
play  must  represent  the  poet  in  no  serious  mood. 
It  is  known  that  it  was  intended  at  first  for 
private  circulation  in  MS.  only.  It  was  never  in- 
tended to  be  '  clapper-claw'd  with  the  hands  of  the 
vulgar  '  or  '  sullied  with  the  smoky  breath  of  the 
multitude,' l  as  if  the  poet  meant  only  those  who 
could  read  between  the  lines  to  get  possession  of  it. 
If  this  were  true,  it  would  explain  in  some  measure 
the  irresponsible  treatment  of  the  Homeric  heroes, 
and  would  help  one  to  accept  the  play  as  his  contri- 
bution to  the  Jonson-Marston  controversy,  which 
raged  during  the  few  years  succeeding  1599. 

If  this  much  be  conceded,  it  is  not  altogether 
difficult  to  account  for  the  choice  of  subject. 
Jonson  and  Dekker  had  both  bandied  words  amid 
classical  scenes,  Jonson  choosing  no  less  distin- 
guished an  arena  than  Rome  in  its  golden  era. 
So  that  this  play  of  Shakespeare's,  in  adopting 
classical  scenes  and  characters,  was  only  falling 
into  line  with  the  current  convention, 

1  See  Preface  to  Quarto  n.,  published  by  Bonian  and  Walley  1609. 
This  pirated  edition  caused  the  play  to  be  produced  on  the  stage 
almost  immediately. 


60      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

With  regard  to  Shakespeare's  part  in  the  con- 
troversy it  is  more  difficult  to  speak.  It  is  hard 
to  say  how  far  he  waded  into  the  flood  of  correc- 
tion, advice,  and  abuse  :  indeed  it  is  hard  to  say 
which  side  he  chose  to  support. 

The  figures  of  Jonson  and  Dekker  stand  out, 
in  Troilus  and  Cressida,  in  their  disguises  as  Ajax 
and  Thersites  respectively.  Ajax  is  '  valiant  as 
the  lion,  churlish  as  the  bear,  slow  as  the 
elephant/ *  In  him  '  Nature  had  crowded  her 
humours ' — surely  a  plain  hint  of  that  contem- 
porary who  prided  himself  on  being  c  one  in 
whom  the  humours  and  elements  were  peaceably 
met/ 2  Thersites,  whenever  he  opened  his 
6  mastic  jaws,' 3  was  for  ever  seeking  out  the 
c  incontinent  varlets,' 4  cudgel  in  hand ;  and  at  the 
same  time  he  gives  full  and  ample  description 
of  all  cthe  odious  vermin  that  Nature  ever 
suffered  to  crawl  on  the  face  of  the  earth.'  And 
this  is  no  bad  picture  of  that  writer  (viz.  Dekker), 
who  was  wont  to  take  his  note-book  into  the 
oddest  of  corners  to  obtain  material  for  his 
Bellman  of  London  or  his  Guilds  Hornbook. 

But  if  Shakespeare  stages  in  the  play  certain  of 
his  brother  playwrights,  it  by  no  means  follows 
that  he  sides  with  one,  or  makes  any  definite 

1  Troilus  and  Cressida,  I.  ii.  20  ff. 

2  Cf.  the  description  of  Crites  in  Jonson's  Cynthia  s  Revels,  u.  i. 

3  Troilus  andCressida,  I.  iii.  73.  4  Ibid.,  v.  i.  102. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      61 

pronouncement  on  his  contemporaries  and  their 
conduct.  Apparently  he  nurses  no  one  cause 
more  than  the  other,  nor  does  he  belabour  either. 
He  exhibits  a  'brainless  Ajax'  and  an  equally 
uncomplimentary  Thersites.1  But  as  he  is  known 
to  have  made  no  enemies  by  his  travesty,  this 
neutral  position  might  have  been  expected  ;  and 
the  probability  seems  to  be  that  in  his  '  brainless 
Ajax '  he  reflected  not  Jonson  himself,  but  the 
Jonson  of  Dekker's  Satiromastix  \  and  similarly 
with  Thersites,  not  Dekker  himself  but  the 
Dekker  of  Jonson's  splenetic  play. 

If  the  play  be  taken,  then,  as  a  placard  on  the 
theatrical  controversy,  the  only  possible  inference 
seems  to  be  that  it  was  Shakespeare's  intention  to 
unfold  the  absurdities  on  both  sides,  to  recall  the 
combatants  from  their  bitter  sport,  and  to  per- 
suade them  to  take  up  serious  work  again.  Just 
as  the  fatal  attachment  to  perfidious  women  had 
emasculated  the  valour  of  Homer's  heroes,  so, 
Shakespeare  hinted,  the  fruitless  indulgence  in 
angry  invective  would  lower  the  dignity  and  sap 
the  life  of  the  English  literary  race. 

The  burlesque  setting  of  a  Homeric  background 
has  been  already  sufficiently  accounted  for.  But 
the  glamour  of  chivalry  would  have  the  further 
merit  of  throwing  ridicule  upon  the  grandiloquent 
manner  in  which  the  poets  fought  out  their  trivial 

1  Troilus  and  Cressida,  i.  iii.  380. 


62      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

fight.  And  it  would  also  burlesque,  by  the  way, 
the  Romantic  adaptations  of  classical  lore,  so  dear 
to  the  Renascence  scholar.  It  was  not  to  bur- 
lesque the  Iliad  nor  yet  the  Fairy  Queen  ;  only 
the  extravagances  to  which  these  masterpieces 
gave  rise  under  feeble  pens. 

If  Troilus  and  Cressida,  therefore,  be  considered 
a  pendant  to  this  controversy  of  the  dramatists, 
these  are  the  links  by  which  it  hangs.  When  the 
actor  Kemp  describes  Shakespeare  as  having  given 
'  that  pestilent  fellow  Jonson  ...  a  purge  that 
made  him  beray  his  credit/ *  it  is  probable  that  he 
was  thinking  of  the  wholesome  advice  in  Troilus 
and  Cressida,  and  this  is  none  the  less  probable  since 
Shakespeare  himself  presents  therein  an  '  Armed 
Prologue/  in  reply  to  that  prefixed  by  Jonson  to 
his  Poetaster. 

Leaving  now  this  atmosphere  of  controversy,  it 
is  intended  to  inquire  into  the  actual  relations 
which  existed  between  Shakespeare  and  Jonson 
as  far  as  it  is  possible  to  know  them.  There  is 
always  something  of  charm  about  a  contempo- 
rary's estimate  of  a  writer  that  must  ever  be 
wanting  in  that  of  posterity,  even  though  the 
latter  has  the  advantage  of  perspective.  The 
good  wine  of  a  poet  may  reach  posterity  the 
mellower  for  its  years,  but  there  is  a  warm  tint 
about  growing  grapes  that  passes  with  their  day. 

1  Return  from  Parnassus,  Part  II.  IV.  v. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      63 

There  is,  however,  conflicting  evidence  about 
the  intimacy  of  these  two  dramatists  which  makes 
the  question  as  difficult  as  it  is  interesting. 

On  the  one  hand  it  would  seem  scarcely  doubt- 
ful that  Jonson  was  jealous  of  Shakespeare.  He 
seems  to  make  opportunities  of  gibing  at  him  and 
his  methods.  In  Every  Man  in  His  Humour  he 
invites  his  audience  to  witness  with  him  a  proper 
play,  in  which  they  would  need  no  wafting  over 
seas,  nor  would  an  army 

*  with  three  rusty  swords 

And  help  of  some  few  foot  and  half-foot  words 
Fight  over  York  and  Lancaster's  long  jars/1 

—evidently  a  sneer  at  Shakespeare's  large  treat- 
ment of  history. 

He  has  a  fling  at  Shakespeare's  Caliban  and 
Winter  s  Tale  when  he  promises  elsewhere  to  his 
audience  that  there  should  be  no  'servant  monster' 
in  his  play,  and  that  he  was  loth  to  frighten  nature 
in  his  plays  like  c  those  that  beget  tales,  tempests, 
and  such  like  drolleries.'2  In  several  places,  too, 
he  turns  to  ridicule  a  line  in  Julius  C<sesar  that 
scarcely  seems  to  deserve  such  treatment.3  In 
one  place  he  deliberately  says  of  Shakespeare  that 
'  he  wanted  art.' 4  But  in  spite  of  all  this,  with 

1  E<very  Man  in  His  Humour,  Prologue  9. 

2  Bartholomew  Fair,  Introduction. 

3  Cf.  Jonson's  Discoveries  '  de  Shakespeare  nostrat.' 

4  Conversations  'with  Drummond. 


64      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

the  mermaid  scene  before  one,  and  with  Jonson's 
generous  tribute  to  his  great  contemporary  in 
those  prefatory  verses  to  the  First  Folio,  it  is 
hard  to  believe  that  any  real  jealousy  sundered 
the  two.  It  was  a  glorious  wreath  with  which  he 
adorned  the  memory  of  the  departed,  when  he 
described  him  as  'Soul  of  the  Age';1  and  his 
prophecy  concerning  Shakespeare's  words,  that 
they  were  '  not  for  an  age  but  for  all  time,7  throws 
a  halo  of  dignity  round  prophet  and  poet.  '  I 
loved  the  man,'  he  said  elsewhere,  *  and  do  honour 
his  memory,  on  this  side  idolatry,  as  much  as  any. 
He  was  indeed  honest,  and  of  an  open  and  free 
nature ;  had  an  excellent  phantasy,  brave  notions, 
and  gentle  expressions.' 2  These  are  not  the 
words  of  a  small-hearted,  narrow-minded  man. 

Moreover,  what  appear  to  be  sneers  in  his  works 
may  well  be  put  down  to  bluntness  of  criticism. 
c  His  wit  was  in  his  own  power,'  he  said  in  refer- 
ence to  Shakespeare  ;  c  would  the  rule  of  it  had 
been  so  too.  Many  times  he  fell  into  those 
things,  could  not  escape  laughter.'  This  is  his 
direct  criticism,  and  it  corresponds  in  tenor  with 
the  deprecatory  remarks  in  his  plays.  But  his 
admiration  ever  rose  above  all  cavilling,  and  he 
acknowledges  that  this  brother  dramatist  of  his 
'  redeemed  his  vices  with  his  virtues,'  and  that 

1  Underwoods,  xii. 

2  See  Discoveries  '  de  Shakespeare  nostrat.' 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      65 

<  there  was  ever  more  in  him  to  be  praised  than 
to  be  pardoned.' 

In  addition  to  all  this,  there  is  a  mass  of  testi- 
mony as  to  the  ample  recognition  of  Shakespeare's 
worth  on  the  part  of  other  of  his  contemporaries. 

Webster,  a  dramatist  singularly  happy  in 
occasional  phrase,  commended  him  for  *  his 
right  happy  and  copious  industry.' 1  Another 
of  those  connected  with  the  stage  had  seen  '  his 
demeanour  no  less  civil  than  he  (was)  excellent 
in  the  quality  he  professed.  Besides  divers  had 
reported  his  uprightness  of  dealing  which  argued 
his  honesty,  and  his  facetious  grace  in  writing 
that  approved  his  art/  2  Meres  had  praised  him 
for  his  skill  in  tragedy  and  comedy,  and  placed 
him  'among  the  most  passionate  ...  to  bewail 
and  bemoan  the  perplexities  of  Love.'  Camden 
included  him  among  '  the  most  pregnant  wits ' 3 
of  his  time,  while  Drayton,  after  he  had  severed 
his  connection  with  the  stage,  wrote  of  him  as 
having  c  as  smooth  a  comick  vaine  ...  as  strong 
conception,  and  as  Cleere  a  rage  as  any  one  that 
trafiqu'd  with  the  stage/ 4  Spenser  referred  to 
him  as  Action, 

*  Whose  Muse,  full  of  high  thoughts  invention, 
Doth  like  himselfe  heroically  sound ' ; 5 

1  Dedication  to  Vittoria  Corrombona. 

2  Chettle,  Kind-Harte 's  Dream.  3  Camden,  Remains  (1604). 

4  Drayton,  Lines  to  Reynolds,  Of  Poets  and  Poesie. 

5  See  Colin  Clout 's  come  Home  again,  11.  444-7. 

E 


66      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

while  Chettle,  after  Elizabeth's  death,  alluded  to 
him  as  '  the  silver-tongued  Melicert,'  and  grieved 
that  no  '  sable  tear '  had  dropped  from  his  c  honied 
Muse '  to  bewail  her  loss.  A  shallower  testimony 
perhaps  than  all  these,  but  still  of  worth,  was  that 
of  Gallic,  the  fashionable  gallant  in  a  well-known 
play.1  He  entreats  the  duncified  world  to  esteem 
Spenser  and  Chaucer  if  they  would.  '  I  '11  wor- 
ship/ said  he,  '  sweet  Mr.  Shakespeare,  and  to 
honour  him  will  lay  his  Venus  and  Adonis  under 
my  pillow.' 

But  amidst  all  this  chorus  of  praise  there  was 
naturally  a  note  or  two  of  discord.  '  His  sweeter 
verse  contains  hart-robbing  life,' 2  wrote  an  un- 
known contemporary,  but,  possibly  ignorant  of 
the  greatest  works,  he  wishes  that  the  subject  of 
his  praise  could  content  himself  with  graver 
subjects  and  leave  '  love's  foolish  languishment.' 
Of  earlier  and  later  jealousy,  too,  there  can  be 
no  doubt.  But  Greene's  well-known  description 
of  'the  upstart  crow'  and  of  the  conceited 
'  Shakescene ' 3  reflects  rather  the  temper  of  the 
writer  than  the  character  of  his  subject.  Mar- 
ston's  allusion  in  his  Histriomastix  to 

*  When  Troylus  shakes  his  furious  speare,' 
as  it  stands  in  the  context,  also  comes  under  the 

1  Return  from  Parnassus,  Pt.  I.  iv.  i.  2  Ibid.,  Pt.  II.  i.  ii. 

3  Greene,  Groatsworth  of  Wit. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      67 

head  of  these  discordant  allusions.  But,  like 
that  of  Greene,  it  goes  no  further  than  the  idle 
remark  of  a  disappointed  author. 

There  can  be  no  doubt  then  of  the  contem- 
porary high  opinion  of  Shakespeare.  The  ravens 
croaked,  as  croak  they  will ;  but  justice  was  done 
to  him  in  his  lifetime,  earnest  of  the  fuller  justice 
which  awaited  him  in  the  centuries  to  come. 

Some  of  the  contemporary  opinions  concerning 
Ben  Jonson  came  to  light  in  the  course  of  the 
controversy  already  discussed.  He  is  compli- 
mentarily  mentioned  by  Heywood  as  one  c  whose 
learned  pen  was  dipt  in  Castaly.' 1  There  is 
admiration,  too,  in  what  Webster  said  of  him  and 
'  his  laboured  and  understanding  works.7  2  Of 
himself  rare  Ben  said  much,  but  he  was  scarcely 
a  fair  critic.  Another  remark  is  immoderate  in 
the  opposite  direction.  He  was  no  '  mere 
empiric ' 3  as  Ingenioso  would  have  it,  c  who  got 
what  he  had  by  observation.'  He  was  *  a  slow 
inventor,'  but  it  was  not  advisable  for  him  to 
return  to  his  old  trade  of  brick-laying,  as  the 
same  critic  maliciously  hinted. 

To  Marlowe  a  fleeting  homage  is  paid  by 
Shakespeare  in  a  well-known  passage  ;  and  '  the 
dead  shepherd  '  with  his  c  saw  of  might ' 4  is  one  of 

1  Heywood,  Hierarchy  of  Blessed  Angels. 

2  Dedication  to  Vittoria  Corrombona. 

3  Cf.  Return  from  Parnassus,  pt.  11.  i.  ii. 

4  As  You  Like  It,  in.  v.  80. 


68      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

the  few  to  whom  acknowledgments  are  made  in 
the  Shakespearean  text.  According  to  another 
contemporary,  Marlowe  was  renowned  for  '  his 
rare  art  and  wit.' *  But  the  best  epitaph  comes 
from  the  unknown  writer  of  the  Return  from 
Parnassus,  and  is  couched  in  a  singular  happiness 
of  phrase  : — 

4  Marlowe  was  happy  in  his  buskin  Muse, 
Alas,  unhappy  in  his  life  and  end, 
Pity  it  is  that  wit  so  ill  should  dwell, 
Wit  lent  from  Heaven,  but  vices  sent  from  Hell.'  2 

Greene  is  probably  intended  where  allusion  is 
made,  in  Midsummer  Night's  Dream,  to  the  '  thrice 
three  Muses  mourning  for  the  death  of  Learning 
late  deceased  in  beggary/  3  Shakespeare  was  pro- 
bably thinking  of  that  brother  artist — at  one 
time  his  bitter  enemy  and  detractor,  but  to  whom 
he  also  owed  many  a  merry  scene  and  '  pleasant 
quippe.'  He  had  been  described  by  another  con- 
temporary as  having  c  in  both  Academies  ta'en 
degree  of  Master,'4  and  this  would  connect 
Greene  with  the  c  Learning '  so  prominent  in  the 
description.  The  allusion,  however,  has  also  been 
thought  to  refer  to  Spenser,  who  died  '  for  lack  of 
bread'  in  1599.  But  in  this  case  the  allusion 

1  Hey  wood,  Hierarchy  of  Blessed  Angels. 

2  Return  from  Parnassus,  Pt.  II.  I.  ii. 

3  Midsummer  Nighfs  Dream,  v.  i.  52. 

4  Hey  wood,  Hierarchy  of  Blessed  Angels. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY       69 

would  necessarily  be  a  later  interpolation,  for  the 
play  in  which  it  occurs  cannot  possibly  be  of  so 
late  a  date.  Greene's  works  must  have  declined 
in  popularity  as  the  sixteenth  century  closed.  In 
Every  Man  out  of  His  Humour  Carlo  recommends 
Greene  as  an  author c  whence  (one)  may  steal  with 
more  security '  ; l  obviously  on  account  of  the 
general  want  of  acquaintance  at  that  time  with 
what  he  had  written. 

Lodge,  who  had  '  his  oare  in  every  paper  boat,' 2 
is  thus  happily  alluded  to  by  one  dramatist ;  the 
merit  of  the  description  lying,  of  course,  in  the 
fact  that  this  versatile  Elizabethan  had  ventured 
up  every  lane  of  literature  when  the  description 
was  penned,  and  was  settling  to  his  Galen  and  his 
medicines  after  a  career  as  poet,  playwright, 
satirist,  pamphleteer,  and  novelist. 

Spenser,  like  Shakespeare,  found  early  recogni- 
tion, though  it  was  academic,  not  material  success. 
He  was  described  in  the  Return  from  Parnassus  as 

'  A  swifter  swan  than  ever  sang  in  Poe, 
A  shriller  nightingale  than  ever  blest 
The  prouder  groves  of  self-admiring  Rome.'3 

Even  Jonson,  who  disliked  his  Shepherd's 
Calendar,  and  could  not  help  thinking  that  '  in 
affecting  the  ancients  he  writ  no  language,'  yet 

1  See  H.  i.         2  Return  from  Parnassus,  Pt.  II.  i.  \\.         3  Ibid. 


70      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

wished  him  to  be  read  for  his  matter,  'just  as 
Vergil  read  Ennius.' 1  Critical  as  he  was,  Jonson 
was  certainly  alive  to  the  merits  of  this  poet,  and 
it  is  with  something  like  regret  that  he  says  else- 
where that  *  if  it  were  put  to  question  of  the 
water-rhymer's  works  against  Spenser,  no  doubt 
the  former  would  find  more  suffrages/ 

In  the  sixth  sonnet  of  the  Passionate  Pilgrim y 
Spenser,  <  with  his  deep  conceits,'  is  also  men- 
tioned, and  Dowland,  that  rare  musician,  c  with 
his  heavenly  touch.' 

Nash  was  '  a  fellow  .  .  .  whose  muse  was 
armed  with  a  gag  tooth,  and  his  pen  possessed 
with  Hercules  furies.' 2  Yet,  in  spite  of  his 
Bohemian  devilry,  he  won  a  softer  touch  from 
the  contemporary  dramatist,  who  was  constrained 
to  add  :— 

'  His  style  was  witty,  though  he  had  some  gall, 
Something  he  might  have  mended,  so  may  all.' 

Marston  seems  to  have  received  blows  from 
others  than  Jonson.  In  the  Return  from  Parnassus 
he  is  called 

4  a  ruffian  in  his  style 

(Who)  quaffs  a  cup  of  Frenchman's  Helicon, 

Then  royster-doysters  in  his  oily  terms, 

Cuts,  thrusts,  and  foins  at  whomsoe'er  he  meets.'  s 

The  c  sweet,  honey-dropping  Daniel,'  on  the  other 

1  Jonson' s  Discoveries. 

2  Return  from  Parnassus,  Pt.  II.  i.  ii.  3  Ibid. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      71 

hand,  is  lavishly  complimented  by  the  same  writer 
when  he  is  credited  with  waging  war  with  that 
proud  Italian  who  had  melted  his  heart  in  sugared 
sonneting.  But  this  only  illustrates  the  often 
short-sighted  character  of  contemporary  criticism  ; 
for  Daniel  could  scarcely  meet  Petrarch  on  equal 
terms. 

The  venerable  Holinshed,  too,  comes  in  for 
contemporary  notice  ;  but  the  dramatic  reference 
surely  cannot  have  represented  the  average  senti- 
ment towards  that  c  painful '  chronicler  among 
whose  stores  Shakespeare  found  so  many  treasures. 
'  Dunce  Hollingshed,'  and  the  '  Englishman  who 
wrote  of  shows  and  sheriffs,'  are  inadequate 
descriptions  of  so  reverend  a  man,  and  something 
of  impatience  and  intolerance  clings  to  these  state- 
ments of  Fletcher's. 

Concerning  Fletcher  himself  and  his  relations 
with  Beaumont,  contemporary  opinion  was  unable 
to  make  any  assertion.  They  made  '  one  poet  in 
a  pair  of  friends/ l 

( As  two  voices  in  one  song  embrace, 
Fletcher's  keen  treble  and  deep  Beaumont's  bass/ 

And  with  this  degree  of  discrimination  the  ques- 
tion remains  unanswered. 

There  yet  remains  a  literary  eccentric  of  the 

1  Cf.   Jasper    Maine's    lines,    On    the   Works    of   Beaumont   and 
Hetcher. 


72      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

time  upon  whose  character  the  drama  throws 
some  light.  He  had  published  an  account  of  a 
journey  of  his  under  the  quaint  title  of  Crudities 
hastily  gobbled  up  in  Five  Months'  Travel  in  France, 
Italy,  etc.,  and  more  than  one  dramatist  satirises 
him.  Fletcher  does  so,  and  in  the  Onos  of  his 
Queen  of  Corinth,  the  heavy-witted  weakling  who 
has  made  the  grand  tour  hits  off  in  perfect  fashion 
the  eccentricities  of  Coryate  ;  and  to  fix  the  allu- 
sion beyond  all  doubt,  mention  is  made  also  of 
4  the  fork-carving  traveller/  *  the  point  of  which 
lies  in  that  use  of  the  fork,  new  to  English  ways, 
but  ostentatiously  practised  by  the  enlightened 
Coryate  after  his  stay  in  Italy. 

Of  the  actors  who  were  wont  to  interpret  the 
dramas,  we  get  but  little  actual  information  in  the 
writings  themselves.  Perhaps  '  poor  Yorick,' 
to  whom  Hamlet  paid  a  tribute  in  the  Danish 
churchyard,  was  intended  for  Tarleton  the  comic 
actor,  the  fool  of  King  Lear,  and  the  jester  of 
Twelfth  Night,  whose  flashes  of  merriment,  accom- 
panied by  pipe  and  tabor,  were  wont  to  '  set  the 
table  on  a  roar,  ...  a  fellow  of  infinite  jest,  of 
most  excellent  fancy/2  cThe  people  began  to 
laugh,'  said  Nash,  '  when  Tarleton  first  peept  out 
his  head';  and  from  Fuller's  description  it  is 
gathered  '  that  the  self-same  words  spoken  by 
another  would  hardly  move  a  merry  man  to  smile, 

of  Corinth,  iv.  i.  2  Hamlet,  v.  i.  191  ff. 


HIS  DAY      73 

which,  uttered  by  him,  would  force  a  sad  soul  to 
laughter/ 

To  the  famous  trio,  Lewin,  Burbage,  and 
Kempe,  all  certainty  of  reference  seems  lost  in 
Shakespeare.  Possibly  it  is  Burbage  who  is 
alluded  to  when  Hamlet  is  described  as  c  fat  and 
scant  of  breath '  ;  for  Burbage  took  the  part  and 
was  of  corpulent  build.  Elsewhere,  however,  the 
fame  of  Burbage  and  Kempe  is  implied  when  it  is 
stated  that  '  there  Js  not  a  country  wench  that  can 
dance  Sellengers  Round  but  can  talke  of  Dick 
Burbage  and  Will  Kempe/  1 

A  few  stage  directions  also,  contained  in  the 
first  editions  of  various  plays,  introduce  us  to 
several  actors  whom  we  hardly  know  otherwise. 
We  find  that  John  Wilson  took  the  part  of 
Balthazar  in  Much  ddo  about  Nothing,  and  sang 
*  Sigh  no  more,  ladies,'  that  Sincklo  was  a  beadle 
in  the  drama  of  Henry  IV.,  a  keeper  in  3  Henry 
VI.,  and  one  of  the  players  in  the  Introduc- 
tion to  The  Taming  of  the  Shrew.  Humphrey,  or 
Humphrey  Jeafes,  is  known  to  us  in  the  same 
way.  He  took  the  character  of  the  second  keeper 
in  Henry  VL,  and  in  this  drama  also  one  Gabriel 
acted  as  messenger,  and  Nicke,  probably  Nicholas 
Tooley,  likewise  played  a  messenger's  part  in  the 
Taming  of  the  Shrew.  The  insertion  of  their 
names  would  perhaps  seem  to  suggest  that 

1  Return  from  Parnassus,  Pt.  II.  iv.  v. 


74      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

Shakespeare  was  wont  to  associate  in  his  mind 
certain  roles  with  certain  actors,  and  would  develop 
them  accordingly. 

Besides  paying  rare  tributes  of  recognition  to 
those  who  moved  in  the  fierce  light  of  the  Court, 
and  to  those  who,  like  themselves,  lived  by  the 
pen,  in  some  few  instances  the  Elizabethan 
dramatists  seem  to  have  had  other  contemporaries 
in  their  mind  while  their  characters  were  coming 
to  the  birth,  and  these  characters  in  consequence 
were  moulded  on  those  personalities.  Some- 
times contemporaries  were  openly  staged,  as  in 
the  instance  of  Stukely,  already  mentioned.  The 
play  in  which  he  is  so  treated  is  The  Battle  of 
Alcazar,  named  after  the  battlefield  where  he 
met  his  fate.  He  came  of  a  Devonshire  family, 
and  was  placed  by  some  enthusiasts,  along  with 
great  Charlemagne,  as  the  type  of  chivalry  and 
courage. 

Perhaps  one  of  the  most  certain  identifications 
with  regard  to  such  characters  is  that  of  Shake- 
speare's Shylock.  During  the  earlier  years  of  the 
poet's  life  in  London  a  Jewish  doctor  of  Portuguese 
descent,  called  Roderigo  Lopez,  was  holding  a 
prominent  position  in  the  metropolis,  and  cannot 
have  been  otherwise  than  well  known  to  the 
members  of  the  theatrical  profession.  Most 
probably  the  personage  was  the  original  of  much 
in  the  character  of  Shylock.  It  is  a  striking 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      75 

coincidence  that  Antonio,  the  name  of  the  Vene- 
tian merchant,  was  also  the  name  of  a  former 
friend  of  Lopez,  the  Portuguese  pretender, 
c  King  Antonio,'  who  was  ultimately  the  cause  of 
Lopez's  downfall.  The  physician  was  implicated 
in  a  plot  to  poison  Elizabeth,  and  his  trial  and 
execution  brought  to  a  head  the  slumbering  hatred 
of  the  people  against  men  of  his  creed.  So 
Shylock  was  painted  in  all  the  grim  colours  that 
the  contemporary  imagination  had  seen  in  Lopez. 
He  became  the  permanent  scapegoat  at  which 
might  be  hurled  the  execrations  begun  at  Tyburn 
when  Lopez  was  executed  ;  and  the  treachery  and 
malice  of  the  historic  personality  lived  on  for  the 
Elizabethans  in  the  dramatic  character  which  has 
excited  the  wonder  and  sometimes  the  pity  of 
succeeding  generations. 

An  equally  certain  identification  seems  possible 
in  the  very  different  instance  of  the  easy-going 
Sir  Hugh  Evans,  the  Welsh  schoolmaster  of 
Windsor.  The  original  in  this  case  was  also  a 
Sir  Hugh  and  a  Welsh  schoolmaster  too.  But  he 
lived  in  Gloucestershire,  was  possessed  of  much 
quaintness,  and  his  educational  methods  were 
sufficiently  remarkable  to  attract,  not  only  notice 
of  a  local  kind,  but  also  the  attention  of  some 
among  the  contemporary  writers.  From  one  we 
learn  that  the  historical  Sir  Hugh  was  accused 
before  the  Mayor  of  his  town  of  teaching  false 


76      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

Latin,  and  moreover  that  his  boys  profited  little 
or  nothing  by  his  teaching,  whereupon  '  hee  told 
their  fathers  that  they  should  play  at  Cat,  or 
Spanne  Counter,  with  all  the  boyes  in  the 
Countrey.' l  Such  was  this  Gloucestershire  par- 
son, and  that  he  had  something  in  common  with 
the  kindly  pedagogue  of  Windsor  will  appear  when 
the  latter  dismisses  William  Page,  who  has  shown 
no  very  creditable  acquaintance  with  Latin  gram- 
mar, with  the  words,  *  Go  your  ways  and  play  : 

go.'2 

Sir  Francis  Drake  is  undoubtedly  eulogised  in 
Dekker's  play  called  "The  Whore  of  Babylon,  where 
Titania  (Elizabeth)  is  addressed  as  having  sent 
forth  a  Drake: — 

'  Which  from  their  rivers  beat  their  water-fowl, 
Tore  silver  feathers  from  their  fairest  swans 
And  plucked  the  Halcyons'  wings  that  rove  at  sea, 
And  made  their  wild-ducks  under  water  dive 
So  long,  that  some  never  came  up  alive.' 

This  is  obviously  a  reference  to  the  Armada 
defeat,  and  is  one  of  the  few  instances  in  which 
direct  mention  is  made  of  that  event  on  the  stage. 
In  the  same  play  the  Armada's  strength  is  detailed, 
but  the  medium  is  prosaic  verse.  Elsewhere  a 
passing  reference  is  made  to  the  victory  in  a  play 

1  A  Paradox  in  praise  of  a  Dunce.     164.2. 

2  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  iv.  i.  78. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      77 

called  If  You  know  not  Me,  where  Elizabeth  is 
represented  as  receiving  the  great  news  at  Tilbury 
which  had  just  come  post-haste. 

Whether  Shakespeare  meant  the  pompous 
Justice  Shallow  to  be  a  bold  sketch  of  Sir  Thomas 
Lucy,  has  given  rise  to  much  discussion.  There 
can,  however,  be  hardly  any  doubt  that  in  the  fussy 
Gloucestershire  magistrate  one  can  see  much  that 
calls  up  the  Knight  of  Stratford  and  neighbour- 
hood. The  well-known  pun  about '  a  dozen  white 
louses  in  an  old  coat ' x  is  certainly  a  squib  aimed 
at  the  Lucy  family,  whose  arms,  as  Dugdale  tells 
us,  were  c  three  luces  harrant  en  argent/  the 
luce  or  pike  being  very  abundant  in  that  part  of 
the  Avon  which  flowed  through  Stratford.  When 
the  page  expresses  thanks  for  certain  venison,  the 
Knight's  meanness  in  ignoring  the  usual  custom 
of  sending  in  occasional  gifts  to  the  corporation 
is  reviled.  When  Shallow  threatens  vengeance 
for  the  riot,  there  is  a  reminiscence  of  *  the  ryot ' 
made  by  thirty-five  Stratford  men  '  upon  Master 
Thomas  Lucy,  esquier.'  So  that  it  seems  almost 
certain  that  the  Stratford  incident  is  consistently 
alluded  to  in  this  introductory  scene  of  The  Merry 
Wives  ;  and  if  so,  it  must  have  left  with  the 
poet  far  from  bitter  memories.  Falstaff  treats 
with  witty  impertinence  the  injured  Justice  who 
wished  to  '  make  a  Star-Chamber  matter ' 2  of  the 

1  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  i.  i.  2  /£^ 


78      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

offence,  and  here,  perhaps,  one  listens  again  to 
some  of  the  quips  which  young  Shakespeare  had 
exchanged  with  the  grave  Sir  Thomas  in  the  old 
days.  It  is,  at  any  rate,  significant,  that  of  all 
Falstaff  's  delinquencies,  the  only  one  which  that 
merry  rascal  is  not  punished  for,  is  that  of  beating 
the  Justice's  men,  killing  his  deer,  and  breaking 
open  his  lodge.  The  nature  of  the  prank 
warrants  one  in  assuming  that  the  poet  was  here 
drawing  on  youthful  memories.  It  was  an  ex- 
crescence rather  than  a  regular  growth  of  the 
original  conception  of  that  valiant  knight,  who 
was  more  often  witnessing  to  his  greatness  in 
detected  foibles  than  in  successful  lawlessness. 

In  Loves  Labour Js  Lost^  Armado,  c the  refined 
traveller  ' 2  from  tawny  Spain,  is  also  clearly  drawn 
from  a  contemporary  figure.  He  was  that 
*  phantasticall  Monarcho,'  subject  of  an  epitaph 
by  Churchyard,  a  familiar  figure  at  the  English 
Court,  and  truly  '  a  most  illustrious  wight.1 3  He 
was  one  of  those  whom,  according  to  Meres, 
'  popular  applause  doth  nourish,  who  gape  after 
no  other  thing  but  praise  and  glory.'  According 
to  another  contemporary  writer  (Nash),  he  c  wore 
crowns  in  his  shoes,  quite  renounced  his  natural 


1  See  paper  by  Mr.  Sidney  Lee, '  A  New  Study  of  Love's  Labour  \r 
Lost"  (Genfs.  Mag.  1880);  also  Fleay  and  Halliwell-Phillips'  Memo- 
randa to  Lo*vis  Labour  V  Lost. 

2  Lwis  Labour"*  Losty  i.  i.  162,  172.  3  Ibid.,  i.  i.  176. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      79 

English  accents  and  wrested  himself  wholly  to  the 
Italian  puntilios.'  In  Shakespeare  this  *  child  of 
fancy/ l '  this  fashion's  own  Knight,'  was  evidently 
named  after  the  Spanish  expedition  of  1588, 
though  Monarcho's  own  name  is  mentioned  by 
Boyet  in  connection  with  his  '  Phantasime.' 2  The 
surmise  that  Shakespeare  intended  Armado,  *  a 
man  of  fire-new  words/  3  to  be  John  Lyly,  Moth 
to  be  Nash,  the  curate  Nathaniel  the  Rev.  Robert 
Green,  and  the  pedantic  schoolmaster  Holofernes 
to  be  the  pamphleteer  and  pedagogue  Cooper — all 
this  must  be  dismissed  as  futile.  The  reasons 
advanced  in  its  support  are  vague  and  conflicting. 
Holofernes,  it  might  be  added,  has  sometimes 
been  identified  with  Florio,  the  distinguished 
Italian  scholar  and  translator  of  Montaigne,  who 
dogmatically  assailed  c  the  plaies  that  they  plaie  in 
England.'  But  it  seems  far  from  likely  that 
Shakespeare  would  have  ridiculed  one  who  had 
lived  for  some  years  in  the  pay  and  patronage  of 
the  Earl  of  Southampton,  to  whom  the  dramatist 
owed  so  much.  It  is  also  just  as  unlikely  that  the 
pedant  is  intended  for  the  schoolmaster  Richard 
Mulcaster,  the  great  educationist  of  his  day. 

Other  well-known  personalities,  however,  that 
certainly  rise  out  of  the  dramatic  pages  are  the 
brother  Shirleys — Sir  Thomas,  Sir  Anthony,  and 

1  Loves  Labour 'V  Lost,  I.  i.  169  ff. 

2  Ibid.,  iv.  i.  99.  3  Ibid.,  I.  i.  177. 


8o      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

Mr.  Robert.  They  have,  in  fact,  a  play l  devoted 
to  their  travels,  for  which  three  dramatists,  Day, 
Wilkins,  and  Rowley,  were  responsible.  The 
experiences  of  these  brothers  were  very  varied. 
The  eldest  was  a  military  man  who,  after  some 
privateering,  fell  into  Turkish  hands  and  was 
with  difficulty  released.  The  others  were  con- 
nected with  Eastern  diplomatic  missions,  and 
were  the  first  ambassadors  at  the  Persian  Court. 
They  won  the  gratitude  of  the  Sophy  of  Persia 
by  advice  in  military  matters,  and  received  in 
return  great  honour.  The  play,  which  embraces 
all  their  travels,  touches  not  only  at  the  Persian 
Court  but  also  Russia,  Rome,  Constantinople, 
Venice,  and  Madrid,  and  in  this  way  forms  a 
notable  instance  of  the  widening  interests  of  the 
nation,  while  in  the  fact  that 

'all  Persia  sings 
The  English  brothers  are  coe-mates  for  kings,' 

the  audience  would  feel,  no  doubt,  a  touch  of  pride. 

Sir  Thomas  Gresham  is  alluded  to  in  a  play 
called  If  Ton  know  not  Me.  The  part  he  played  in 
founding  the  royal  Exchange  is  hinted  at,  and  the 
College  of  the  royal  merchant  too  is  mentioned, 
which  has,  however,  since  decayed. 

Hobson,    the   famous    Cambridge    carrier,   is 

1  The  Travailes  of  the  Three  English  Brothers,  Sir  Thomas,  Sir 
Anthony,  and  Mr.  Robert  Shirley. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      81 

mentioned  by  Middleton  where  one  of  Hobson's 
porters  is  represented  as  taking  a  letter  from 
young  Tim  Yellowhammer  at  Cambridge  to  his 
respected  parents  in  London — the  same  Hobson, 
of  course,  who  was  wont  to  give  such  slender 
choice  of  hacks  to  undergraduate  applicants,  and 
whose  familiar  figure  Milton  honoured  with  a 
place  in  his  mighty  verse. 

Garnet  the  Jesuit  is  alluded  to  by  the  Porter  in 
that  dreadful  midnight  scene  at  Macbeth's  castle. 
This  Jesuit  was  tried  in  1606,  and  attempted  to 
defend  his  doctrine  of  Equivocation,  according  to 
which  '  a  lie  which  deceived  was  not  immoral  if 
the  speaker  could  mentally  put  a  truthful  sense 
on  the  words  actually  used/  and,  on  the  authority 
of  a  great  modern  historian,  *  the  popular  feeling 
against  this  doctrine  found  a  voice  in  the  words 
of  the  Porter/ 

Bankes  the  showman  is  also  mentioned  by 
Moth  in  Love's  Labour  V  Lost  in  connection  with 
his  famous  dancing-horse.  It  was  credited  with 
mysterious  powers,  and  its  position  in  the  age  can 
be  gathered  from  the  fact  that  Raleigh  saw  fit  to 
mention  it  in  his  great  History  of  the  World. 

The  old  woman  of  Brentford,  whom  Falstaff 
impersonated  in  the  basket  scene  of  the  Merry 
Wives?  was  also  an  historical  figure.  She  was 
regarded  as  a  witch,  but  was  in  reality  the  hostess 

1  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  iv.  ii.  164  ff. 
F 


82      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

of  a  tavern  whose  eccentricities  earned  for  her 
notoriety. 

For  different  reasons  was  *  Mistress  Moll '  still 
more  notorious.  Her  real  name  was  Mary 
Frith,  and  in  the  Roaring  Girl,  Middle  ton  and 
Dekker  made  of  her  as  Moll  Cutpurse  a  pathetic 
principal.  She  was  supposed  to  be  the  most 
notoriously  bad  woman  of  the  day.  She  is  said 
to  have  repented  at  St.  Paul's  Cross,  but  being 
apparently  in  liquor  at  the  time,  some  allowance 
must  be  made  for  her  after-conduct.  Her  case  is 
viewed  with  charity  in  the  play  already  mentioned, 
and  the  potentiality  of  virtue  in  things  evil  is  the 
moral  of  the  play.  She  is  frequently  alluded  to  by 
other  dramatists,  notably  by  Shakespeare,1  and 
was  evidently  well  fixed  in  the  public  eye. 

In  addition  to  this  portrait-work  in  which 
the  dramatists  thus  indulged,  there  are  also  to 
be  found  in  their  works  occasional  reflections 
of  striking  incidents  that  formed  part  of  the  life 
around  them. 

Nowhere  does  Shakespeare  more  successfully 
reflect  the  glitter  of  an  aristocratic  function  than 
in  his  use  of  the  masque  to  deck  a  certain  courtly 
marriage.  That  A  Midsummer  Night's  Dream  was 
in  the  first  instance  a  topical  play  of  the  kind 
seems  more  than  probable.  Theseus  wooing 
Hippolyta  '  with  pomp,  with  triumph,  and  with 

1  Twelfth  Night,  i.  iii.  125. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      83 

revelling '  forms  the  subject  of  the  masque,  though 
one  other  incident  at  least  is  reflected.  Into 
the  main  subject,  however,  as  into  a  frame, 
is  woven  the  anti-masque,  which  rests  on  the 
drolleries  of  the  Athenian  mechanics,  softened  by 
the  sweet  movement  of  the  elvish  fairies.  Various 
suggestions  have  been  made  as  to  the  particular 
wedding  it  was  designed  to  celebrate.  That  of 
Essex  in  1590,  of  Bedford  in  1593,  of  Derby  in 
1595,  of  Southampton  in  1598 — all  have  been 
suggested.  There  is  no  external  evidence  to 
support  the  claims  of  any.  The  title-page  of 
neither  Quarto  alludes  to  the  court  performance 
which  must  have  been  the  original  motive  of  the 
poet's  fancy.  Perhaps  the  supposition  that  the 
play  was  written  for  Derby's  wedding  festivities  is 
most  probable  from  the  point  of  view  of  dates. 
For  Bottom's  suggestion  that  the  lions  in  the  play 
within  the  play,1  might  frighten  the  ladies  unless 
reassuring  words  were  inserted  in  the  Prologue, 
refers  unmistakably  to  an  incident  connected  with 
the  christening  of  Prince  Henry  of  Scotland. 
This  took  place  in  1594.  A  live  lion  was  to  have 
figured  there,  but  a  Moon  was  substituted,  as 
being  less  dreadful  for  the  spectators — an  incident 
which  must  have  touched  Shakespeare's  humour 
when  his  lungs  were  '  tickle  o'  the  sere.' 

Macbeth,  the  great  Scottish  tragedy,  was  doubt- 

1  Midsummer  Nighfs  Dream,  in.  i. 


84      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

less  written  in  homage  to  the  prince  who  ascended 
the  English  throne  in  1603  ;  and  in  this  play  the 
plotting  of  the  Thane  of  Cawdor  is  a  distinct 
reminiscence  of  the  Gowrie  conspiracy,  which  dates 
about  this  time.  In  1 605  the  dignities  of  Scone 
were  forfeited  by  the  Earl  of  Gowrie,  and  Sir 
James  Murray  was  invested  with  them.  (The 
uncivil  allusion  of  Chapman  and  Marston  to  this 
personality  in  their  Eastward  Hoe  has  already  been 
mentioned.)  In  just  the  same  way  as  the  historical 
forfeiture  took  place,  so  Duncan  resolves  that  the 
Thane  of  Cawdor  should  no  more  deceive  his 
4  bosom  interest/  He  therefore  commissions 
Ross  to  bestow  Cawdor's  honours  on  Macbeth. 
The  witches,  too,  play  their  part.  They  represent 
the  poet's  attempt  to  clothe  with  flattering  dignity 
the  unholy  hags  to  whom  the  royal  demonologist 
consecrated  so  many  pages. 

The  innovation  which  took  place  about  this 
time  in  dramatic  circles,  of  creating  whole  com- 
panies of  children-actors,  finds,  as  might  reasonably 
be  expected,  a  reference  on  the  stage.  This  new 
departure  had  been  successful  in  causing  a  schism 
among  the  playwrights,  and  it  seems  highly 
probable  that  Shakespeare  viewed  such  childish 
companies  as  that  at  the  Chapel  Royal  with 
extreme  disapproval.  The  laborious  Ben  Jonson 
would  devote  his  time  freely  to  instructing  them 
in  their  parts  of  his  Cynthia's  Revels,  or  The 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY       85 

Poetaster  ;  to  teaching  this  eyrie  of  children  how 
to  declaim  his  stilted  verse,  or  to  cry  out  his 
intricate  gibes  on  the  top  of  their  falsetto.  But 
Shakespeare  no  doubt  felt  that  the  youngsters  who 
did  so  berattle  the  common  stage  were  not  fit  to 
interpret  the  madness  of  his  Lear,  or  the  baleful 
ambition  of  a  Macbeth.  For  in  Hamlet  the 
courtiers  of  Elsinore  cast  innuendoes  on  the 
triumph  of  the  children -actors  who,  when  my  Lord 
Chamberlain's  Company,  in  disgrace  with  royalty, 
betook  themselves  to  travel,  carried  off  '  Hercules 
and  his  load  '  *  (in  other  words,  the  Globe  Theatre) 
from  Messrs.  Burbage,  Heming  and  Condell. 
The  Prince  of  Denmark — and  one  takes  him  to 
be  Shakespeare's  mouthpiece  in  this  instance — 
could  foresee  the  harm  which  would  befall  the 
actor's  profession  in  England  from  the  furthering 
of  this  novelty,  and  he  points  out  that  when  the 
children  themselves  become  common  players,  they 
would  assuredly  blame  their  patrons  for  having 
made  them,  in  their  childhood,  c  exclaim  against 
their  own  succession.' 2 

Another  notable  event  of  the  time  was  that 
voyage  of  Sir  George  Summers'  to  Virginia  in 
1 609,  when  his  fleet  was  dispersed  in  the  Atlantic, 
and  his  own  ship  wrecked  on  the  Bermudas. 
Fragments  of  these  distant  adventures  found  their 
way  on  to  the  stage  at  home,  for  during  that 

1  Hamlet,  11.  ii.  366.  2  Ibid.,  355. 


86      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

calm  period  of  his  life  when  Shakespeare  seemed 
to  have  retired  to  some  shadowy  island  to  weave 
romances,  he  still  kept  near  to  the  movement  of 
English  life,  and  no  doubt  eagerly  read  all  in- 
teresting details  of  foreign  adventure.  In  his 
'Tempest  he  obviously  used  hints  of  strange  and 
marvellous  doings,  which  he  had  gathered  from  a 
book  by  Silvestre  Jourdain 1  relating  to  the  events 
of  this  famous  voyage.  This  writer  had  formed 
one  of  the  crew,  and  his  description  of  the  Isle 
of  Devils  supplied  much  romantic  material ;  and 
though  Shakespeare,  in  his  usual  way,  improved 
on  his  romance  by  creating  the  weird  population 
of  Prospero's  island,  and  by  drawing  a  strong  line 
of  contrast  between  man  civilised  and  the  savage 
treacherous,  yet  the  basis  of  topical  truth  under- 
lying its  conception  remains  apparent,  even  to  the 
mentioning  of  those  c  still-vex'd  Bermoothes.' 2 

Mention  might  also  be  made  here  of  that  picture 
of  the  Carib  worshipping  the  sun  in  Love 's 
Labour's  Lost.3  But  this  is  only  one  of  other 
numerous  instances  where  the  dramatist  speaks  of 
strange  lands  and  illustrates  the  lasting  impression 
which  the  discovery  of  the  New  World  and  the 
opening-up  of  its  wonders  had  made  on  his 


1  See  A  Discovery  of  the  Bermudas,  otherwise  called  the  lie   of 
Devils,   by   Sir   Thos.    Gates,   Sir   Geo.  Summers,   and   Captayne 
Newport,  and  divers  others,  1610. 

2  Tempest,  i.  ii.  229.  3  Love's  Labour's  Lost,  v.  ii.  202. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      87 

imagination.  Raleigh's  participation  in  colonial 
enterprise,  however,  was  apparently  overlooked, 
though  there  is  one  flying  reference  to  '  Guiana, 
all  gold  and  bounty/  in  the  Merry  Wives?  an 
allusion  which  would  doubtless  appeal  to  the 
contemporary  audience  from  the  fact  that  Raleigh 
had  only  just  returned  ;  and  another  by  FalstafF, 
who  sees  in  Mistress  Ford  a  veritable  West 
Indian. 

Besides  using  in  this  way  much  of  the  romance 
and  awful  wonders  that  kept  pouring  into  Eng- 
land from  over  the  seas,  Shakespeare  kept  his  ear 
agog  for  municipal  tit-bits,  which  then,  as  now, 
were  humour  of  the  sort  best  described  as 
aldermanic.  The  immortal  colloquy  between 
Dogberry  and  the  Watch  in  Much  Aao  about 
Nothing 2  is  evidently  the  result  of  certain  ponder- 
ous municipal  efforts  in  the  way  of  legislation, 
afterwards  embodied  in  the  '  Statute  of  the  Streets ' 
in  the  year  1595. 

When  the  clown  says  to  Olivia  in  Twelfth 
Night?  that  '  words  are  very  rascals  since  bonds 
disgraced  them/  there  is  possibly  an  allusion 
intended  to  the  Privy  Council's  order  of  1600-1, 
according  to  which  all  play-houses  except  the 
Globe  and  the  Fortune  were  to  be  closed.  It 
was  an  order  that  laid  no  light  bonds  on  the 

1  Merry  Wi<ves  of  Windsor ',  I.  iii.  67. 

2  Much  Ado  about  Nothing,  in.  iii.  3  Twelfth  Night,  m.  i. 


88      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

dramatists.  The  special  enactment  for  the  relief 
of  soldiers  landing  from  over  the  seas  is  also 
referred  to  in  All's  Well,  where  Lafeu  turns 
away  from  Parolles,  c  the  man  whom  Fortune  had 
cruelly  scratched,'  with  the  words,  '  There 's  a 
cardecue  for  you  !  Let  the  Justices  make  you 
and  Fortune  friends  :  I  am  for  other  business/  * 
The  Justices  were  called  upon  to  give  penniless 
soldiers  a  new  start  in  civil  life. 

There  is  also  an  allusion  to  the  famous  Poor 
Law  of  1 60 1  in  Pericles  y  though  it  is  not  alto- 
gether complimentary  as  to  the  success  of  its 
working ;  for  when  the  fisherman  drawing  up 
his  net  calls  '  Help,  master,  help  ! '  he  also  some- 
what loquaciously  adds,  c  Here  's  a  fish  hangs  on 
the  net  like  a  poor  man's  right  in  the  law,  'twill 
hardly  come  out.' 2 

In  the  play  called  Sir  Thomas  More,  the  rising 
against  foreigners  on  that  black  May-day  of  1 5 1 7 
has  been  thought  to  allude  to  the  contemporary 
discontent  which  arose  in  the  city  some  seventy 
years  later;  for  the  apprentices  rose  in  1586, 
while  ten  years  later  saw  other  and  more  general 
riots  springing  from  the  same  cause. 

The  earthquake  of  1 580  is  alluded  to  by  Juliet's 
old  nurse.3  It  is  for  her  a  landmark  of  time. 
The  '  late  eclipses  ' 4  of  King  Lear  probably  relate 

1  All  V  Well  that  Ends  Well,  v.  ii.  35.         2  Pericles,  11.  i.  1 1 6. 

3  Romeo  and  Juliet,  i.  iii.  23.  4  King  Lear,  I.  ii.  106  ff. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      89 

to  the  sun's  great  eclipse  of  1605,  while  the 
*  machinations,  hollowness,  and  treachery '  of  the 
same  passage  allude  to  the  Gunpowder  Plot. 
The  abundant  harvest  of  1606  is  probably  hinted 
at  in  Macbeth?  where  a  farmer  is  said  to  have 
c  hanged  himself  on  the  expectation  of  plenty/ 
And  strangest  of  all,  the  stranding  of  a  whale  on 
the  coast  of  Kent  in  the  year  '73  is  probably 
commemorated  in  2  Henry  IV .^  when  the  King 
advises  Clarence  to  blunt  not  young  Henry's  love, 
but  '  in  his  moods  to  give  him  line  and  scope  till 
that  his  passions,  like  a  whale  on  ground,  con- 
found themselves  with  working.' 2 

The  invention  of  the  movable  topmast  in 
Shakespeare's  own  time  is  hinted  at  in  the  Tempest, 
when  the  boatswain  in  the  storm  commands  that 
spar  to  be  lowered  ; 3  while  the  map  engraved  for 
the  English  version  of  Linschotens  Voyage  (in 
1598),  in  which  India,  Ceylon  and  the  East  is 
more  fully  treated,  is  what  is  referred  to  in  'Twelfth 
Night  when  Malvolio  is  said  to  c  smile  his  face 
into  more  lines  than  are  in  the  new  map  with  the 
augmentation  of  the  Indies.' 4  The  map  already 
referred  to  was  remarkable  for  its  sets  of  lines. 
Also  when  Jonson  remarks  *  that  carmen  and 
chimney-sweeps  are  got  into  the  yellow-starch,' 5 

1  Macbeth,  n.  iii.  2  2  Henry  IV.,  iv.  iv.  40. 

3  Tempest,  i.  i.  37.  4  Twelfth  Night,  in.  ii.  78. 

5  Jonson,  De<vil  V  an  Ass. 


90      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

he  is  alluding  to  a  passage  of  contemporary  history. 
Yellow  starch  had  been  much  used  by  fashionables 
for  bands  and  ruffs.  It  had  been  invented  by  an 
infamous  tire-woman  called  Turner,  who  being 
implicated  in  the  Overbury  murder,  was  hanged 
at  Tyburn.  She  chose  to  die  in  a  yellow  ruff  of 
her  own  invention,  and  yellow  starch  in  conse- 
quence became  so  hateful  that  it  ceased  to  be 
worn  except  by  the  lowest  classes  of  society. 

Besides  these  fleeting  reflections  of  English 
contemporary  life  which  were  from  time  to  time 
inserted  in  the  Elizabethan  drama,  there  are  some 
which  relate  to  foreign  events  and  personalities,  and 
carry  the  interest  of  the  audience  beyond  the 
narrow  seas. 

Shakespeare's  first  undoubted  play,  Loves 
Labour  *s  Lost,  is  filled  with  topical  items  of  this 
kind.  Contemporary  French  politics  play  the 
chief  part,  but  Spain  and  even  distant  Russia  are 
enlisted  to  supply  interest  to  this  strange  dramatic 
medley  of  fact  tricked  out  in  Fancy's  robes.1 

The  cause  of  the  ' matchless  Navarre/ 2  at  whose 
Court  the  scene  of  the  play  is  laid,  excited  in 
England  the  keenest  sympathy,  and,  in  fact,  four 
thousand  volunteers  under  Essex  had  just  swelled 
his  forces  when  the  play  was  written.3  The  three 
courtiers  who  attend  on  Navarre  in  the  play  are 

1  See  paper  by  Mr.  Sidney  Lee,  *  A  New  Study  of  Loves  Labour  V 
Lost"  (Genfs.  Mag.  1880). 

2  Loves  Labour  ^s  Lost,  n.  i.  7.  3  i.e.  1589. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      91 

named  after  the  three  conspicuous  leaders,  the 
Mareschal  de  Biron,  the  Due  de  Longueville,  and 
the  Due  de  Mayenne  (also  called  Du  Maine). 
The  last  of  these  was  in  reality  at  the  head  of  the 
League,  and  Shakespeare  probably  confused  him 
with  a  supporter  of  the  rival  cause.  Motte,  the 
diplomatic  page,  that  '  pigeon-egg  of  discretion,' l 
seems  to  have  been  a  reminiscence  of  the  Comte 
de  la  Motte,  the  popular  French  ambassador 
in  London  ;  while  the  mention  of  the  '  Duke 
Alen^on ' :J  was  perhaps  a  slight  tribute  to  the 
French  prince  of  that  name,  the  public  and  per- 
sistent suitor  for  the  hand  of  Elizabeth. 

Of  all  the  poet's  intended  identifications,  how- 
ever, that  of  Biron  is  one  of  the  most  complete 
and  satisfactory.  Its  original  was  the  gallant 
French  marshal,  and  the  portrait  is  pregnant  with 
points  of  resemblance.  His  well-known  c  rhodo- 
montades,  jactance  et  vanites,'3  are  all  re-echoed  by 
Shakespeare  in  his  hero's  extravagant  bravery,  his 
'  brilliancy  replete  with  mocks/  4  The  relegation 
of  the  hero  to  the  hospital  at  the  end  of  the  play 
may  well  be  a  remembrance  of  his  own  words  : 
'  Je  ne  scay  si  je  mourroi  sur  I'eschaffaut,  mais  je 
scay  bien  que  je  ne  mourroi  qu'a  Fhospital.' 

The  romantic  journey  of  the  Princess  of  France 
has  also  an  historic  counterpart  in  the  political 

1  Lovis  Labour ''s  Lost,  v.  i.  72.  2  Ibid.,  n.  i.  61. 

3  Quoted  as  uttered  by  the  King  himself  in  Biographic  Universelle, 
*  Lovis  Labour  "s  Lost,  v.  ii.  833. 


92      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

mission  which  in  1586  brought  to  St.  Bris, 
Catherine  de  Medici,  and  her  'escadron  volant* 
of  seductive  ladies,  with  the  object  of  initiating  a 
political  alliance  between  the  Bourbon  prince  and 
her  son,  the  '  decrepit,  sick ' l  representative  of 
the  House  of  Valois.  The  alliance  took  place 
actually  in  1589. 

Yet  another  scene  in  the  play  is  the  dramatising 
of  an  historic  episode.  The  strained  relations  be- 
tween the  English  and  the  Muscovite  Courts  at 
the  time  when  the  play  was  being  written,  awoke 
anew  the  interest  in  an  event  seven  years  past.2 
The  Russians  disguising  in  Love's  Labour's  Lost 
were  suggested  by  an  embassy  from  the  Czar  to 
Elizabeth  in  1583,  with  a  view  to  obtaining  one 
of  her  kinswomen  as  a  bride.  The  awkwardness 
with  which  the  Russian  envoy,  Count  Pissemsky, 
made  his  proposal,  awoke  the  ridicule  of  the 
courtly  spectators ;  and  Lady  Mary  Hastings, 
whom  Elizabeth  had  selected  for  the  honour,  as 
being  of  royal  lineage,  was  known  ever  after  at 
Court  as  the  Empress  of  Muscovia,  although  she 
refused  the  imperial  suitor.  This  is  the  historical 
incident  which  the  poet  introduced  by  way  of  inter- 
lude, though  the  masquerading  of  *  the  Prince 
and  his  bookmates '  as  '  frozen  Muscovites ' ; 

1  Cf.  Love's  Labour's  Lost,  i.  i.  139. 

2  Cf.  Giles  Fletcher,  Of  the  Russe  Commonwealth. 

3  Lowe's  Labour' *s  Lost,  v.  ii.  264. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      93 

is  not  a  little  whimsical,  especially  when  it  is 
purposed  to  gain  the  favour  of  the  ladies 
thereby. 

Other  passing  allusions  to  French  events  occur- 
ring at  the  time  are  met  with,  in  both  the  Comedy 
of  Errors  and  'The  Merchant  of  Venice.  The  former 
was  written,  in  all  probability,  very  soon  after 
Love's  Labour 's  Lost,  and  in  it  Dromio  describes 
the  contemporary  condition  of  France  as  '  armed 
and  reverted,  making  war  against  her  (i.e.  his 
mistress's)  hair/  1  alluding,  of  course,  to  the  hostile 
and  aggressive  position  taken  up  by  the  League 
against  Henry  of  Navarre.  In  the  Merchant 
of  Venice^  the  reference  is  slighter  ;  but  '  the 
flourish  when  true  subjects  bow  to  a  new-crowned 
monarch ' 2  can  probably  be  placed  among  these 
allusions  and  assigned  to  the  final  entry  of  the 
hero  of  Ivry  into  Paris  as  King  of  France. 

In  Lyly's  Sapbo  and  Phao,  also,  there  occurs  an 
allusion  to  the  Duke  of  Anjou,  who  will  be  re- 
membered as  one  of  the  Queen's  suitors.  His  re- 
jection is  hinted  at  in  the  play,  when  Phao  departs 
from  Sicily,  the  Queen  (Sapho)  of  which  island 
he  is  deeply  enamoured  with.  The  departure  of 
Anjou  was  quite  recent  when  this  play  was  written. 
There  yet  remain  two  plays,  or  double  plays, 
which  present  in  some  ways  the  most  direct  reflec- 

1  Comedy  of  Errors,  in.  ii.  123. 

2  Merchant  of  Venice,  in.  ii.  49. 


94      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

tion  of  French  events  which  marked  the  English 
stage. 

Chapman's  Bussy  d'Ambois  and  the  Revenge  of 
Bussy  deal  with  actual  historical  personages,  and 
with  events  which  may  well  have  been  in  the 
memory  of  some  of  the  audience.  The  story  is  in 
itself  a  common  one  :  ambition  and  love  lead  to 
over-confidence  and  intrigue,  and  cause  the  fall  of 
a  courageous  adventurer.  The  fall  of  Bussy  is 
avenged  by  his  brother  Clermont.  But  the  inter- 
est arises  not  only  from  the  intrigues  depicted,  but 
also  from  the  characters  of  Henry  in.,  Alen^on, 
Anjou  and  Guise,  which  move  to  and  fro  on  the 
stage. 

In  the  Biron  tragedies,  the  incidents  would  be  of 
still  more  interest  to  the  audience,  as  being  yet  more 
recent  in  date.  The  execution  of  Biron,  Marshal 
of  France,  only  took  place  in  1602  ;  so  that  there 
was  some  reason  for  the  displeasure  of  the  French 
ambassador  at  having  this  tragedy  of  his  Court 
set  daily  before  gaping  English  audiences.  The 
knowledge  of  Biron's  conspiracy  against  his  royal 
master  was  not  confined  to  the  French  Court. 
Elizabeth  is  said  to  have  significantly  pointed  to 
*  Essexii  caput '  when  he  visited  her  on  an  embassy ; 
and  though  this  point  is  not  in  the  drama,  yet 
the  whole  event  is  generally  well  depicted,  in- 
cluding Biron's  stubbornness  in  refusing  to 
comply  with  the  generous  conditions  of  Henry  iv. 
for  a  confession. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      95 

The  most  interesting  allusions  to  Spanish  affairs 
come,  on  the  other  hand,  from  the  plays  of  Lyly. 
Written  as  they  were  about  the  time  of  the  great 
Armada,  one  would  naturally  expect  in  them  some 
reference  to  so  mighty  an  event.  In  his  Midas, 
Philip  is  unmistakably  depicted.  His  delay  in 
despatching  his  fleet,  long  after  the  huge  prepara- 
tions were  complete,  is  bitterly  commented  on  by 
a  disappointed  son  of  Spain,  who  complains  c  that 
now  when  he  should  execute,  be  begins  to  consult, 
and  suffers  the  enemy  to  bid  us  good-morrow  at 
our  own  doors,  to  whom  we  long  since  might  have 
given  the  last  good-night  in  their  own  beds ' — the 
delay,  of  course,  caused  by  the  '  singeing  of  the 
King  of  Spain's  beard.'  After  the  overthrow  of 
the  great  expedition,  Philip,  as  '  Midas/  is  repre- 
sented as  lamenting  :  c  Have  not  I  made  the  sea  to 
groan  under  the  number  of  my  ships  :  and  have 
they  not  perished,  that  there  was  not  two  left  to 
make  a  number  ? ' l  And  throughout  the  play, 
England  is  glorified,  sometimes  by  implication, 
elsewhere  directly.  It  is  proudly  described  as 
Lesbos  which  '  the  gods  have  pitched  out  of  the 
world,  as  not  to  be  controlled  by  any  in  the  world/ 2 
This  play  of  Lyly's  gives  what  is  perhaps  the 
most  accurate  picture  of  the  events  of  '88  which 
appeared  on  the  stage.  These  are  most  definite 
allusions  to  the  ambitious  Spaniard,  who  accord- 
ing to  Elizabeth  herself  wished  to  *  make  himself 

1  Midas,  m.  i.  2  IbuL,  v.  iii. 


96      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

king  of  the  whole  world.1  *  Less  certainly,  though 
still  possibly,  an  allusion  exists  behind  the  figure 
of  great  Tamburlaine  as  drawn  by  Marlowe  :  that 
sacrilegious  conqueror  who  fought  for  universal 
power  and  compelled  vanquished  monarchs  to 
draw  his  chariot  like  *  pampered  jades.' 

It  is  remarkable  how  small  a  part  the  people 
who  lived  east  of  the  Rhine  played  in  English 
politics  and  literature  at  this  time.  Theirs  was 
the  soil  in  which  grew  to  a  fine  ripeness  the 
Faustus  and  Fortunatus  legends  ;  it  was  the 
starting-point  of  much  black  magic,  and  of  many 
a  most  '  damnable  historic/  but  these  were  the 
sole  points  of  contact,  and  a  reference  to  the 
German  people  in  Elizabethan  times  was  nearly 
always  in  connection  with  these  matters.  In  the 
course  of  Elizabeth's  reign,  however,  there  came 
from  the  Rhineland  a  Count  of  Mompelgard, 
paying  a  visit  to  the  Court  of  Windsor.  He 
had  the  splendid  satisfaction  of  cozening  all 
mine  hosts  of '  Readings/  of  Maidenhead,  and  of 
Colebrook,  of  their  horses  and  money  ;  cozening 
them  by  a  royal  permit  which  left  the  honest  fellows 
in  a  state  of  open-mouthed  astonishment.  There 
was  much  humour  in  the  incident,  viewed  in  a 
strictly  disinterested  light,  and  Shakespeare  made 
use  of  it  in  the  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor?'  The 

1  Elizabeth's  words  to  the  French  ambassador,  1594. 

2  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  iv.  v.  76. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      97 

result  is  that  amusing  scene  where  the  loyal 
host  of  the  '  Garter '  is  plunged  into  painful 
perplexity  on  account  of  the  'three  cozen- 
germans'  who  had  just  left  certain  neighbour- 
ing hostelries  in  such  a  flutter.  In  the  first 
Quarto  the  allusion  is  still  more  direct,  the 
'  cozen-germans '  there  being  rather  audaciously 
called  c  cozen-garmombles,'  which  obviously  is 
but  a  thin  disguise  for  the  name  of  the  noble 
adventurer. 

Attempts  have  also  been  made  to  identify  the 
County  Palatine  and  the  young  German  in  the 
Merchant  of  Venice  with  a  Polish  Palatine  and  the 
Duke  of  Bavaria  respectively.  The  former  had 
visited  England  in  Shakespeare's  time,  had  been 
well  entertained,  but  having  contracted  debts, 
had  left  the  country  hastily.  The  Duke  of 
Bavaria,  too,  is  known  to  have  visited  London 
about  the  same  time,  and  to  have  been  made 
a  Knight  of  the  Garter ;  all  of  which  affords 
some  evidence. 

Of  Dutch  affairs  Shakespeare  has  no  mention, 
unless  there  be  one  in  the  Twelfth  Night.  Fabian 
there  warns  Sir  Andrew  Aguecheek  that  he  has 
sailed  into  the  north  of  his  lady's  opinion,  where 
he  would  'hang  like  an  icicle  on  a  Dutchman's 
beard,' l  unless  he  redeemed  his  cause  by  some 
laudable  attempt  of  valour  or  policy.  In  all 

1  Twelfth  Night,  in.  ii.  26. 
G 


9  8      SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

probability  a  contemporary  reference  lay  con- 
cealed in  these  words,  and  Elizabethan  eyes  may 
well  have  seen  in  them  an  allusion  to  the  two 
Dutchmen  who  sailed  to  the  Arctic  regions  in 
1596  and  discovered  Nova  Zembla.  Beaumont 
and  Fletcher,  however,  devoted  a  play  already 
mentioned  to  the  fall  of  the  great  Advocate 
of  Holland,  Sir  John  van  Olden  Barnaveldt, 
in  which  a  chapter  of  Dutch  history  is  taken 
and  displayed  on  the  English  stage.  But  this 
seems  all.  Elsewhere  these  same  dramatists  make 
passing  allusions  to  continental  matters  such  as  the 
Cleves  War  and  the  murder  of  Maria  de  Medici's 
favourite  minister  Concini,  but  these  events  take 
the  narrative  beyond  the  age  of  Shakespeare,  and 
so  lie  without  the  range  of  the  present  intention. 

In  now  reviewing  what  has  been  gathered  from 
Elizabethan  plays,  of  a  nature  to  help  one  in 
reconstructing  a  picture  of  the  age  that  produced 
them,  it  will  be  seen,  it  is  hoped,  that  material 
of  undeniable  value  offers  itself  for  the  purpose. 
We  can  re-create  the  great  Queen,  proud  yet 
beloved,  crafty  yet  winning,  who  made  for  unity 
while  claiming  adulation  ;  re-create,  too,  some- 
thing of  her  treatment  of  Essex,  her  dealings  with 
Leicester,  and  possibly  catch  glimpses  of  others  at 
her  Court.  If  the  glimpses  are  not  many,  it  is 
perhaps  because  the  men  who  wrote,  found  no 
great  pleasure  in  labouring  in  a  field  where  it 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      99 

was  criminal  to  look  beneath  the  surface,  and 
where  the  places  upon  which  the  sun  shone 
brightest  concealed  the  rankest  weeds.  We  can 
re-create  James  in  all  his  royal  weakness,  as 
superstitious  as  vain,  indulgent  towards  favourites, 
and  halting  in  policy.  We  can  learn  the  way 
of  the  dramatists  with  their  kind  :  much  plain- 
speaking,  much  heart-burning,  with  here  and 
there  kind  statements  of  a  man's  true  worth. 
We  can  re-create  eccentrics  like  Monarcho  and 
poor  Mistress  Moll ;  statelier  forms  like  Drake 
and  Shirley ;  contemporary  incidents  of  domestic 
import,  some  dainty  with  courtly  dignity,  some 
breezy  with  travelling,  some  humorous  and 
parochial  ;  and  incidents  from  the  Continent  also 
of  intrigue  or  absurdity. 

These  figures  would  form  an  invaluable  fore- 
ground to  any  picture.  They  touch  on  most  of 
the  main  arteries  of  life,  and  collectively  would 
go  to  restore,  in  no  inadequate  manner,  the  age 
from  which  they  are  taken. 


CHAPTER  III 

ON  THE  GENERAL  ALLUSIONS  OF  THE  ELIZA- 
BETHAN STAGE 

'  Shakespeare  gives  to  all  nations  the  customs  of  England  and  to  all 
ages  the  manners  of  his  own." — DR.  JOHNSON. 

Now  that  a  certain  number  of  personal  references 
and  particular  allusions  have  been  seen  to  lie 
curiously  entangled  in  the  network  of  the  Eliza- 
bethan drama,  it  remains  to  be  shown  that  from 
the  same  plays  can  be  also  gleaned  some  general 
allusions  which  shall  illustrate  contemporary  types 
and  local  customs,  as  contrasted  with  the  distinct 
personalities  and  definite  events  of  the  particular 
kind. 

It  has  already  been  explained  that  while  the 
latter  class  owe  their  insertion  to  the  definite 
intention  of  the  dramatist,  general  allusions 
spring  from  no  such  cause,  but  are  due  to  the 
silent  workings  of  sympathy  between  the  drama- 
tist and  his  age.  They  are  due  to  an  unconscious 
assimilation  of  Elizabethan  life  —  assimilation 

arising   out    of  an    untiring    observation.       And 

100 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     101 

herein  does  the  dramatist  obey  that  constant 
law  emphasised  by  the  most  distinguished  of 
modern  critics  that  '  the  greatest  poets  and  his- 
torians live  entirely  in  their  own  age.' l  Ben 
Jonson,  too,  made  in  effect  the  same  criticism 
when  he  transferred  from  Florence  to  London 
the  scene  of  his  Every  Man  in  His  Humour •, 
and  at  the  same  time  gave  English  names  to 
his  characters  in  place  of  Italian.  He  recog- 
nised that,  whether  he  desired  it  or  not,  his 
characters  would  turn  out  to  be  English.  He 
felt  that  he  could  only  touch  humanity  through 
the  medium  of  his  own  countrymen.  'Shake- 
speare's mind/  Ruskin  said  truly,  *  was  ever- 
lastingly concentrated  on  his  own  age '  ;  and 
this  was  merely  the  first  condition  for  the  pro- 
ducing of  the  highest  work.  For  human  nature 
at  its  sources  is  one  in  all  latitudes,  and  the 
province  of  Art  lies  in  depicting  this  humanity 
truly  and  grandly,  paying  only  a  secondary 
heed  to  the  frame  in  which  the  subject  may 
present  itself. 

Had  Shakespeare  in  his  Merchant  of  Venice 
posed  as  a  Venetian,  introduced  us  to  magni- 
ficoes  on  the  Rialto,  and  led  us  among  the 
gondolas  shimmering  in  the  sun-bathed  marshes 
of  the  Adriatic ;  had  he  spoken  their  language, 
adopted  their  customs  and  donned  their  dress, 

1  Ruskin. 


102     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

we  should  have  had  more  geography  but  less 
art.  If  in  his  Julius  C<esar  he  had  led  us  to 
Rome,  and  not  shown  us  a  dead  Caesar  on  the 
floor  of  the  Capitol  ;  had  he  conferred  no 
mediaeval  guilds  on  the  Roman  citizens,  nor 
represented  the  Triumvirs  as  meeting  in  Rome, 
we  should  have  had  better  history  but  a  feebler 
creation.  Under  the  unerring  guidance  of  his 
masterly  genius  he  was  persuaded  that  his  mission 
lay  in  his  own  country,  in  his  own  age,  in  his  own 
time.  His  characters  do  not  change  with  the 
climate,  for  England  colours  all  his  creations. 
Galatea  obtained  the  divine  gift  of  life  only  when 
Pygmalion  breathed  part  of  his  own  breath  of  life 
into  his  creation,  and  with  his  breath  that  part  of 
the  age  which  he  had  absorbed  into  his  being.  So 
are  the  characters  of  the  great  Elizabethan  drama- 
tists always  Elizabethan,  their  manners  and  dress 
those  of  the  epoch,  just  as  if  the  dramatists  in 
giving  them  life  had  of  necessity  given  them 
part  of  their  own. 

Their  lovers  are  always  the  lovers  of  the  day  ; 
their  gallants,  the  gallants  of  '  the  Queen's  time  '  ; 
their  soldiers,  the  followers  of  the  gipsy  earl  in 
the  Netherlands  ;  their  rustics,  the  inmates  of  a 
Tudor  village  ;  their  citizens,  the  burgesses  of 
Tudor  London  ;  their  fools,  those  motley  jesters 
*  guarded  with  yellow/  *  whose  bells  jangled  in 

i  Henry  PIIL,  Prol.  16. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     103 

sunlit  quadrangles,  or  along  gloomy  cloisters  of 
country  mansions. 

In  their  foreign  plays  the  characters  are  still 
of  the  Elizabethan  stamp.  English  exquisites 
parade  the  streets  of  Verona,  English  courtiers 
haunt  the  palace  of  Rousillon,  English  peasants 
bandy  rough  jests  in  the  woods  of  Navarre. 
English  carpenters  ply  their  trade  in  Caesar's 
Rome,  English  billiards  and  cards  are  played  in 
Cleopatra's  palace.  Lancastrian  England,  with 
its  mediaeval  feudalism,  becomes  in  Shakespearean 
histories  the  awakened  England  of  the  Renascence ; 
and  even  in  those  plays  which  deal  with  a  Britain 
yet  dark,  there  is  the  same  Elizabethan  tone  and 
colouring.  Elizabethan  nobles  look  on  at  the 
white-haired  Lear's  sufferings  under  the  iron 
skies.  It  is  Elizabethan  splendour  which  decks 
the  palace  of  Cymbeline. 

cFor  what  vestige  of  Egyptian  character  is 
there  in  Cleopatra  ?  of  Athenian  in  Theseus  or 
Timon  ?  of  Old  English  in  Imogen  or  Cordelia  ? 
of  old  Scottish  in  Macbeth  ? — Shakespeare  painted 
honestly  and  completely  from  the  men  around 
him/  l  and  therein  lies  the  explanation  both  for 
him  and  his  fellows. 

To  this  extent,  then,  did  the  Elizabethan  world 
of  incident  first  exorcise  the  dramatists,  and  then 
creep  into  absolute  possession  of  their  working 

1  Ruskln. 


io4     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

hours.  The  Elizabethan  colouring  was  the  only 
condition  on  which  the  Romeos  and  the  Hamlets 
were  to  leave  the  seclusion  of  the  studio,  and 
move  about  in  the  world  outside  as  actual  crea- 
tions. The  creator  of  Hamlet  became  universal 
in  his  reach  because  he  remained,  under  all  cir- 
cumstances and  at  all  times,  an  Elizabethan. 

So  then  it  must  follow  that  these  contemporary 
allusions  of  a  general  kind  are  not  to  be  regarded 
as  unmeaning  excrescences  or  sheer  accidents  in 
the  drama  of  the  time.  They  are  rather  natural 
growths,  signs  of  the  dramatists'  absorption  of 
the  spirit  of  their  age,  and  indispensable  accom- 
paniments of  human  efforts  to  define  the  spirit  of 
permanent  truth,  as  far  as  it  lies  in  humanity.  So 
that  although  Shakespeare's  psychological  studies 
apply  to  the  race,  although  he  was  *  not  of  an 
age  but  for  all  time/  he  was  yet  without  incon- 
sistency, or  rather,  one  should  say,  he  was  of 
necessity,  a  constant  Elizabethan  ;  and  so  with 
his  fellows  without  exception. 

It  was  of  Sophocles  that  Matthew  Arnold  said, 
he  *  saw  life  steadily  and  saw  it  whole/  but  this 
is,  in  even  a  greater  degree,  true  of  Shakespeare. 
It  is  only  natural  to  infer,  therefore,  that  in  his 
works  will  run  threads  of  all  colours,  taken  from 
all  parts  of  the  tapestry  of  life.  His  plays, 
if  they  reflect  faithfully  the  mind  that  wove  them, 
will  depict  scenes  of  country  life  and  town  life, 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     105 

the  professions  and  trades,  Elizabethan  homes 
and  amusements,  the  contemporary  religion  and 
superstition,  and  whatever  else  a  myriad-sided 
life  affords  to  the  beholder.  Details  of  such 
appear  not  only  in  Shakespeare,  but  in  all  the 
other  dramatists  to  a  greater  or  less  degree.  As 
they  were  Elizabethan,  so  the  scenes  and  the 
atmosphere  of  their  plays  are  pure  Elizabethan. 

Here  then  will  be  an  immensity  of  detail  for 
giving  a  background  to  the  proposed  picture  of 
the  contemporary  life. 

Country  lifey  in  the  first  place,  enters  largely 
into  the  scenes  conjured  up  on  the  Elizabethan 
stage.  In  the  case  of  Shakespeare  the  treatment 
is  lavish,  far  more  so  than  with  any  of  his  brother 
playwrights.  Shakespeare  was  a  grown  man  when 
he  arrived  in  London  first,  nor  had  he  had  a 
university  varnish  set  on  his  original  rusticity. 
Throughout  his  life,  moreover,  he  kept  in  touch 
with  his  native  town,  as  we  know  from  his  dealings 
in  real  property.  It  is  more  than  probable  that 
he  would  often  leave  his  abode  in  dingy  South- 
wark  or  Aldersgate  Street,  and  seek  the  repose 
of  the  country,  when  he  could  spare  the  time  in 
the  'Deade  Terme,'  or  when  outbreaks  of  the 
plague  would  close  the  theatres.1  He  would  ride 
down  to  his  Tusculanum  at  Stratford  where  his 
twin-children  were  growing  up,  and  spend  '  a 

1  Tempest,  i.  ii.  3645  Timon  of  Athens,  iv.  i.  21,  etc. 


106     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

July's  day  short  as  December ' l  amid  their  fond- 
lings and  chattering  gambols. 

The  attitude  which  he  preserves  towards  rustic 
life  is  consistently  one  of  complete  and  humorous 
sympathy.  His  studies  of  lower  rustic  life  are 
many-sided  and  vivid,  and  are  couched  as  well  in 
a  most  kindly  vein.  He  must  often  have  stood 
in  the  village  ale-house,  '  a  chiel  amang  them 
takin'  notes,'  while  the  humours  that  floated 
around  good  people  like  old  John  Naps  would 
be  quietly  drenching  him  through  and  through. 
All  the  blown  dignity  of  village  officialdom,  all 
the  monkey  antics  of  the  youthful  villagers,  came 
under  his  eye  and  pen.  He  seems  to  have 
garnered  from  all  sorts  of  places  technical  know- 
ledge which  many  a  farmer  was  wont  to  air  on 
market-days.  Sports  of  all  kinds  he  knew  and 
touched  upon  with  all  the  faithfulness  of  detail 
that  the  most  zealous  devotees  would  desire. 
Their  influence  had  penetrated  deeply  into  his 
being,  for  they  are  to  him  a  never-failing  source 
of  the  richest  metaphor.  Festival  days  in  the 
country  gave  him  rich  memories  of  rustic  revels 
on  Warwickshire  greens,  of  punch-bowls  cheer- 
fully steaming  away  the  discontent  of  a  wintry 
night.  And  these  things  never  fail  to  glow  again 
at  his  will.  He  succeeds  in  hitting  upon  the 
picturesque  side  of  country  life,  just  as  Theo- 

1  Winter's  Tab,  I.  ii.  169. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     107 

critus  did,  whose  peasants  move  for  ever  in  a 
simple  glory  of  Nature's  own.  There  are  times 
when  he  sees  that  the  country  frowns  on  man. 
There  are  days  when 

'Dick  the  shepherd  blows  his  nail 
And  milk  comes  frozen  home  in  pail, 
When  coughing  drowns  the  parson's  saw 
And  Marion's  nose  looks  red  and  raw/ 

But  the  ways  are  not  always  foul.  There  are 
seasons 

*  When  daisies  white  and  violets  blue, 

And  lady-smocks  all  silver  white, 
And  cuckoo-buds  of  yellow  hue, 

Do  paint  the  meadows  with  delight.'1 

And  the  days  when  *  maidens  bleach  their  summer 
frocks '  give  the  real  aspect  of  the  country,  he 
seems  to  say,  for  one  who  hath  the  true  philo- 
sophy in  him  ;  the  country  with  its  '  marigolds 
that  go  to  bed  wi'  the  sun/  2  its  '  daffodils  that 
come  before  the  swallow  dares/3  and  its  pale 
primroses  and  bold  oxlips,  its  c  violets  dim,  but 
sweeter  than  the  lids  of  Juno's  eyes/  It  was 
certainly  the  one  which  lit  up  Shakespeare's  town 

1  See  song,  Love's  Labour  "s  Lost,  ad  fin. 

2  Winter's  ^ale,  iv.  iii.  105.  3  Ibid.,  iv.  iii.  118  ff. 


io8     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

life  with  joyful  anticipation  of  future  repose.  It 
was  undoubtedly  the  one  which  gladdened  that 
rascally  Autolycus  as  he  went  humming  with  that 
light  heart  of  his  over  country  stiles. 

The  vicissitudes  which  influenced  the  life  of 
the  countrymen  and  farmers  seem  to  have  affected 
the  poet  far  more  than  the  innumerable  political 
incidents  which  elicited  such  interest  from  every 
Londoner.  To  Shakespeare,  an  earthquake,  a 
flood,1  a  great  frost,2  an  eclipse  3  are  things  which 
his  memory  marks  with  a  red  letter,  just  as 
Mistress  Quickly  clings,  woman-wise,  to  the 
summer  when  the  Court  rested  at  Windsor 
instead  of  at  Greenwich.4 

Of  the  squire  and  his  '  moated  grange/  of  the 
feudal  lord,  still  a  sovereign  in  his  cmanor  house/  5 
and  who  would  roam  for  miles  in  his  c  pleasant 
chase/  we  are  told  but  little.  The  only  type  of 
the  landed  gentry,  Justice  Shallow,  Armiger — 
identified  over  and  over  again  with  the  owner  of 
Charlecote  as  already  has  been  said — has  been 
presented  to  us  only  as  a  petty  squireen,  who  no 
doubt  would  have  *  a  hundred  milch-kine  to  the 

1  King  John,  in.  ii.  3  and  V.  iv.  53  j  also  Romeo  and  Juliet,  i.  iii. 
23,  and    Churchyard's   Charitie  (pub.    1595).      There  were   great 
floods  in  1594. 

2  Taming  of  the  Shrew ',  IV.  i.  24. 

3  King  Lear •,  i.  ii.  106. 

4  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  ii.  ii.  60  (viz.  1603). 
6  Lovers  Labour  V  Lost,  i.  i.  204. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     109 

pail/  and  '  six  score  fat  oxen  standing  in  the  stall.' 
Shakespeare's  satire  is  directed  against  the  man's 
character,  and  does  not  throw  much  light  on  the 
life  he  led.  Yet  we  can  imagine  him  aping  those 
c  manly  exercises  ' l  for  which  England  has  always 
been  renowned,  exercises  which  Orlando  claims 
as  becoming  to  a  gentleman  and  which  Hamlet 
forgoes  only  when  he  c  loses  all  his  mirth  and  it 
goes  heavily  with  his  disposition.' 2  We  can  see 
him  at  his  table,  '  sprinkled  over  with  all  manner 
of  cheap  salads,  sliced  beef,  giblets,  and  pettitoes, 
to  fill  up  room/ 3  discoursing  on  the  f  couple  of 
short-legged  hens,'  the  joint  of  mutton,  and  the 
*  pretty  little  tiny  kickshaws '  that  William  cook 
has  concocted.4  From  other  sources  we  may 
glean  that  he  loved  hawk  and  greyhound  more 
than  any  mortal  creature.  c  Were  but  a  feather 
of  his  hawk's  train  dispraised  he  would  writhe  his 
mouth ' ;  while  a  compliment  on  his  horse  would 
make  him  a  bondslave.5  He  would  '  disdaine 
trafficke,  thinking  it  to  abase  gentry.'6  He 
would  keep  a  chaplain  to  say  prayers  twice  a  day.7 
But  the  chaplain's  return  would  be  small ;  twenty 
marks  and  board  would  be  good  allowance. 

1  As  You  Like  It,  i.  i.  72.  2  Cf.  Hamlet,  n.  ii.  301. 

3  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Woman  Hater,  i.  ii. 
*  2  Henry  W.,  v.  i.  27  ff. 

5  Cf.  Return  from  Parnassus,  Pt.  II.  n.  vi. 

6  Morryson,  Itinerary. 

1  Lupton,  London  and  the  Country  Carbonadoed,  p.  8. 


no     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

Living  around  would  perhaps  be  some  *  upstart 
country  knight '  who,  through  paternal  industry, 
had  acquired  his  land.  He  would  doff  the  name 
of  clown,  but  the  look  not  so  easily.  His  face 
*  would  still  bear  the  relish  of  churn-milk.7  Such 
a  one  would  be  c  guarded  with  more  gold  lace 
than  all  the  gentlemen  of  the  country  .  .  .  and 
yet  would  remain  but  the  clod  of  his  own 
earth/  1 

In  spite  of  scattered  hints,  however,  no  figure 
of  a  Squire  Western  or  of  a  Sir  Roger  glances 
anywhere  through  the  Elizabethan  pages.  They 
seem  lost  to  perception,  though  such  typical 
Englishmen  must  certainly  have  existed.  But 
perhaps  it  was  because  tenants  and  labourers  were 
more  the  friends  of  that  dramatist,  who  loved  the 
country,  than  were  the  *  neighbouring  gentle- 
men.2 By  '  tenants  and  labourers '  must  be 
understood  not  those  who  would  *  take  warning 
a  quarter  of  a  yeare,1  and  who  had  *  always  to 
bring  security '  wherever  they  intended  to  stay  ; 3 
nor  those  worthless  peasants  that  *  bargained  for 
their  wives  as  market-men  for  oxen,'  4  but  rather 
pleasant  day-women 5  like  trim  Jacquenetta  ;  *  the 
sunburnt  sicklemen  of  August  weary/6  the 

1  Earle,  Microcosmography ,  p.  17.  2  i  Henry  W.,  HI.  i.  90. 

3  Lupton,  London  and  the  Country  Carbonadoed,  p.  5. 

4  i  Henry  PL,  v.  v.  53.  5  Love's  Labour's  Lost,  i.  ii.  129. 
6  Tempest,  i.  iv.  134. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     1 1 1 

trudging  pedlar  with  his  ballads  in  '  print  o'  life/ 
his  silken  treasury  and  c  many  laces,' 1  the  market 
folks  that  sold  their  corn  ;  '  the  knitters  in  the 
sun ' ;  '  the  free  maids  that  wove  their  threads 
with  bones';2  and  the  prattling  butterwomen 
whose  long  Indian  file  wound  itself  at  an  amble 
into  Stratford  market.3  A  plain  country  fellow 
would  be  a  man  of  no  great  education.  He 
would  be  one  '  whose  hand  guided  the  plough 
and  the  plough  his  thoughts/  His  habitation 
would  be  '  some  poor  thatched  roof,  distinguished 
from  his  barn  by  the  loopholes  that  let  out  the 
smoke/  He  would  be  '  a  terrible  fastener  on 
beef/  His  religion  would  be  part  of  his  copy- 
hold which  he  took  from  his  landlord.  He  would 
go  to  church  in  his  best  clothes,  but  when  there 
*  would  be  capable  only  of  two  prayers/  one  for 
rain,  the  other  for  fair  weather.4 

But  more  direct  recollections  than  these  are 
recorded  in  Shakespeare's  works — recollections  of 
the  hamlets  where  in  childhood  he  had  passed 
many  a  morning  playing  at  All-hid,6  Cherry- 
pit,6  Push-pin,7  Span-counter,8  Whipping  a  gig,9 

1  Winter  3  Tale,  iv.  iii.  260  and  3545  2  Henry  VI.,  iv.  ii.  48. 

2  Twelfth  Nig  At,  n.  iv.  45. 

3  As  You  Like  It,  m.  ii.  98  j  All's  Well  that  Ends  Well,  iv.  i.  47 

4  Earle,  Microcosmography,  p.  28  ff. 

5  Lovers  Labour  V  Lost,  iv.  iii.  78. 

6  Twelfth  Night,  in.  iv.  129. 

7  Love's  Labour's  Lost,  iv.  iii.  166.          8  2  Henry  VI.,  iv.  ii    161. 
9  Love's  Labour's  Lost,  iv.  iii.  164  (a  top). 


ii2     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

riding  '  the  wild  mare  with  the  boys/ l  winning 
youthful  ladies  at  '  Leap-frog/ 2  or  in  winter 
erecting  painfully  '  a  mockery  king  of  snow ' ; 
around 

*  dirty  Greton,  dingy  Greet, 
Beggarly  Winchcomb,  Sudely  Sweet/  4 

these  would  be  his  childhood's  games  played 
in  company  with  Kit  Sly,  f  old  Sly's  son  of 
Burton-heath/5  with  Peter  Turf  and  Henry 
Pimpernell.  Later  on  in  his  teens,  no  doubt,  he 
would  slip  round,  after  some  keen  contest  at  the 
butts,  to  Marian  Hackett's  ale-house  in  Wincot 6 
and  drain  a  cup  of  the  renowned  small  beer.7 
The  '  great  oes  in  chalke ' 8  that  stood  behind  the 
door  would  show  up  many  a  villager  more  than 
'  fourteenpence  on  the  score  for  sheer  ale/ 9  while 
the  '  History  of  Judith  or  Susanna,  Dives  or 
Lazarus/  painted  on  the  wall,  would  touch  him 
to  laughter  as  he  thought  of  the  muddled  pates 

1  2  Henry  IV. y  n.  iv.  250  (see-saw). 

2  Henry  ^.,  V.  ii.  138. 

3  Richard  II.,  iv.  i.  260. 

4  Initial  lines  of  a  local  rhyme  enumerating  the  chief  points  of 
interest  in  that  part  of  Warwickshire.     The  country  folk  of  the 
immediate  neighbourhood  still  credit  the  author  of  Hamlet  with  its 
composition. 

5  Naming  of  the  Shrew,  Induction,  ii.  195  Burton-on-the-Heath, 
the  home  of  Shakespeare's  aunt,  Mrs.  Lambert  j  Ibid.,  i.  96. 

6  Wilnecote.  7  Cf.  Sir  Aston  Cokain's  letter  (1658). 

8  Rolands,  Greenes  Ghost,  p.  22. 

9  'Taming  of  the  Shrew,  Induction,  ii.  23. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      113 

that  were  nightly  wont  to  lean  thereon.  Old 
John  Naps  of  Greece,1  with  his  very  chequered 
career,  would  there  be  gossiping  with  the  fat  ale- 
wife,  Marian  Hacket,  and  twenty  more  such  men 
as  he  listening,  all  men  of  colossal  thirsts.  There 
they  would  lean  in  various  attitudes  of  social 
good-humour,  with  a  ' stone-jug*  or  'seal'd  quart12 
at  their  sides.  They  would  peer  at  all  comers,  and 
greet  their  friends  '  with  a  good  thump  on  the 
back/  accompanied  by  a  '  blunt  curse  their 
common  salutation.'3  On  the  doorstep  perhaps 
would  be  lounging  no  less  a  person  than  Antony 
Dull,  the  village  constable, c  a  man  of  good  repute, 
carriage,  bearing,  and  estimation/ 4  one  with  whom 
'  the  ale-house  had  best  hold  correspondence/  for 
he  had  '  command  of  four  places  of  note,  the 
stockes,  the  cage,  the  whipping-post,  and  the 
cucking-stool.'5  On  parting  with  such  a  one, 
the  hostess  or  her  daughter  c  would  kiss  him 
handsomely/6  to  draw  him  hither  again  the 
sooner. 

From  his  early  youth  Shakespeare's  wonderful 
power  of  observing  and  apprehending  must  have 
applied  itself  to  surrounding  details.  No  poet  has 
ever  brought  together  such  a  marvellous  variety 

1  Perhaps  '  Dingy  Greet.' 

2  Taming  of  the  Sfireiv,  Induction,  ii.  90. 

3  Earle,  Microcosmography.  4  Love's  Labour  ""s  Lost,  i.  i.  262. 
5  Lupton,  London  and  the  Country  Carbonadoed,  p.  u. 

«  Ibid.,  p.  9. 

H 


n4     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

of  sketches  and  pictures,  metaphors  and  allusions 
drawn  direct  from  Nature's  workshop,  or  from 
the  most  diverse  forms  of  man's  industry  and  toil. 
Nowhere  is  he  found  repeating  those  classical 
similes  and  images  which  are  the  common  property 
of  merely  talented  authors. 

The  tod  of  wool  from  every  c  'leven  wether ' 
that  '  yields  pound  and  odd  shilling,' *  the  compost 
on  the  weeds,2  the  gardener's  dibble,3  and  the 
grinding  quern,4  have  as  few  secrets  for  him  as 
the  technique  of  hawking,  hunting,  angling, 
coursing,  manege-riding,  or  archery. 

Hawking  was  the  national  sport  of  the  age,  and 
technical  terms  with  regard  to  that  particular 
branch,  as  well  as  those  relating  to  the  chase,  were 
considered  as  a  necessary  part  of  the  vocabulary 
of  every  well-bred  Englishman.  'Why,  you 
know,'  said  Ben  Jonson, c  an  a  man  have  not  the 
skill  in  the  hawking  and  hunting  languages  nowa- 
days, I  '11  not  give  a  rush  for  him.' 5  Shake- 
speare's illustrations  in  this  field  were  more 
frequent  and  accurate  than  those  of  any  other 
playwright.  Petruchio  likens  his  wilful  mistress 
to  those  kites  *  that  bate  and  beat  and  will  not  be 


1  Winter's  Tale,  IV.  ii.  32. 

2  Hamlet,  m.  iv.  151. 

3  Winter's  Tale,  iv.  iii.  100. 

4  Midsummer  Night's  Dream,  n.  i.  36. 

5  Every  Man  in  His  Humour,  i.  i.  47. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      115 

obedient.' 1  Love-sick  Juliet  sighs  for  a  falconer's 
voice  to  lure  her  tassel-gentle  back  again.2  And 
when  Othello  under  lago's  subtle  pressure  begins 
to  doubt  his  Desdemona,  the  words  of  his 
maddened  anger  are  : — 

'  If  I  do  prove  her  haggard, 

Though  that  her  jesses  were  my  dear  heart-strings, 
I  *d  whistle  her  off,  and  let  her  down  the  wind, 
To  prey  at  fortune.'  3 

An  allusion  to  the  common  way  of  controlling 
fractious  hawks.  That  '  horn  and  hound '  exer- 
cised their  stirring  attraction  on  the  poet  there 
can  be  no  doubt.  Theseus'  Spartan  breed — 

*  With  ears  that  sweep  away  the  morning  dew, 
Crook-knee'd  and  dew-lapp'd  like  Thessalian  bulls, 
Slow  in  pursuit  but  match'd  in  mouth  like  bells'4 — 

are  those  same  hounds  which  the  sportsmen  of 
the  day  followed,  two  successive  days,  over  ditch 
and  hedge,  across  hill  and  vale — hounds  of  which 
now  the  nearest  approach  in  type  is  the  *  deep- 
mouthed'  basset.5  Silver  and  Bellman  and  Echo 
would  be  among  '  the  cry,' 5  picking  out  the 
dullest  scent,  careful  only  not  to  *  overtop '  the 


1  Taming  of  the  Shrew,  iv.  i.  191. 

2  Romeo  and  Juliet,  u.  ii.  160.  3  Othello,  in.  iii.  260. 
*  Midsummer  Nighfs  Dream,  iv.  i.  125  if. 

5  Cf.  Taming  of  the  Shrew,  Induction,  i.  20  ff. 


n6     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

chase.  They  would  be  out  as  soon  as  the 
cheery  '  Hunt 's  up  * l  had  rippled  through  the 
morning  air  and  made  the  huntsmen  spring 
from  their  sleep  c  with  a  hey,  and  a  ho,  and  a 
hey  nonino.' 2 

In  his  woodland  plays,  Shakespeare  gives  a  host 
of  the  '  divers  and  sundry  tearms  of  art '  used  by 
those  who  worshipped  at  Diana's  shrine  in  his 
day — such  as  a  buck  of  the  first  head,  a  pricket, 
a  sorell,  a  bracket,  and  a  lean  rascal.  Of  fox  and 
hare  the  country  squire  would  know  enough  c  to 
furnish  fifteen  meales  with  long  discourse  in  the 
adventures  of  each.' 3  Oftentimes  the  sportsman 
would  get  near  his  prey  under  cover  of  '  a  stalking 
horse/  while  when  ladies  wished  *  to  play  the 
murderer,'  buildings,  concealed  by  bushes,  would 
be  raised  in  parks  whence  they  might  shoot  with 
their  cross-bow  at  the  deer  as  they  raced  by. 
Much  of  the  knowledge  would  be  gained  by  the 
dramatist  in  those  *  bosky  acres ' 4  of  Charlecote, 
where  he  had  often  struck  a  doe  with  the  help  of 
his  curt-tailed  dog,  and  '  borne  her  cleanly  by  the 
keeper's  nose/  5  His  array  of  woodland  know- 
ledge cannot  do  otherwise  than  call  up  the  darling 
practice  of  another  Midland  poet,  who  in  his 

1  Romeo  and  Juliet,  HI.  v.  34.     Cf.  Douce,  Illustrations  of  Shake- 
speare.   l  Hunt 's  up '  was  the  tune  to  awake  the  huntsmen. 

2  As  You  Like  It,  v.  iii.  18. 

3  Stephen's  Essays,  Bk.  ii.  6. 

*  Tempest,  iv.  i.  81.  5  Titus  Andronicus,  11.  i.  94. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      117 

Sir  Gawayn  and  the  Grene  Knight  wrote  so  vividly 
and  accurately  of  the  chase  as  he  knew  it. 

At  a  time  when  the  Thames  would  still  yield 
salmon  and  pike,  angling  was  a  widespread  sport ; 
and  it  is  clearly  one  of  the  angling  contests 
between  keen  fishermen  of  the  various  British 
rivers,  that  Shakespeare  has  in  mind  when  he 
makes  Cleopatra  wager  on  her  angling,  and  Char- 
mian  twit  the  Egyptian  Queen  with  the  same.1 

The  *  fawning  greyhound  in  the  leash  '  formed 
another  notable  feature  of  country  life  under  the 
Tudors.  We  find  in  Shakespeare,  not  only  would 
the  sportsmen  start  *  the  timorous  flying  hare/ 2 
with  a  loud  and  wild  *  So  ho  ! ' 3  and  course  her 
down  to  where  they  had  *  pitched  a  toil ' ; 4  but  on 
Cotsall  they  would  have  matches,  and  bets  as  to 
the  merits  of  the  various  famous  dogs.6  Page's 
fallow  greyhound  would  be  sometimes  unexpectedly 
outrun  by  some  dog  *  as  swift  as  breathed  stag/ 6 
and  perhaps  bred  by  little  John  Doit  of  Stafford- 
shire, or  Will  Squele  the  *  Cots-ol'-man.' 7 

Similarly,  innumerable  instances  might  be  de- 
duced from  Shakespeare's  plays  showing  his 

1  Antony  and  Cleopatra,  n.  v.  16. 

2  Venus  and  Adonis,  674.       3  Two  Gentlemen  of  Verona,  in.  i.  189. 

4  Lo*vis  Labour  V  Lost,  iv.  iii.  2. 

5  Merry  Wi*~ves  of  Windsor,  i.  i.  90. 

(i  Taming  of  the  Shrew,  Induction,  ii.  49. 

7  ^  Henry  IV.,  m.  ii.  23.     The  Cotswold  Games  were  revived  by 
Captain  Dover,  having  been  instituted  at  an  earlier  date. 


n8     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

complete  and  ready  acquaintance  with  all  the 
details  of  horsemanship  and  horse-breeding.  But 
that  particular  branch  of  equestrian  art,  the 
manege,  which  was  so  popular  with  all  the  best 
families  of  the  time,  since  the  knowledge  of  it 
went  to  make  c  a  compleat  gentleman/ l  attracts 
from  him  but  scant  attention.  Orlando,  it  is  true, 
has  a  word  about  it  as  an  enviable  but  unnecessary 
accomplishment.  But  when  we  know  that  all  the 
lusty  youths  of  the  country  would  revel  in 
making  '  the  great  horse  '  gallop  the  galliard,  do 
the  capreole,  the  chambretta,  and  dance  the  cur- 
vette,2  it  is  curious,  perhaps,  but  significant  also, 
that  the  poet  should  have  dwelt  so  slightly  on  the 
4  bound  and  high  curvet  of  Mars's  fiery  steed.' 3 

A  subject  more  congenial  to  him  was  that  of 
archery.  It  elicited,  it  will  be  remembered,  a 
whole  treatise  from  the  solid  wit  of  Roger  Ascham, 
schoolmaster.  The  use  of  the  bow  and  arrow 
was  intimately  connected  with  birding  and  fowling, 
and  many  an  hour  did  the  boys  of  Warwickshire 
spend  on  the  watch  for  the  painted  wings  of  the 
pheasant  hidden  in  the  brake,  in  order  to  c  thump  ' 
him  on  his  appearance  with  their  short  thick 
'  bird-bolts.'  *  On  his  return  the  successful  fowler 
would  be  'clapped  on  the  shoulder  and  called 

1  Cf.  Gervase  Markham,  The  Compleat  Gentleman.  2  Ibid. 

»  Airs  Well  that  Ends  Well,  n.  iii.  282. 
4  Love's  Labour's  Lost,  iv.  iii.  22. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      119 

Adam ' l  after  Adam  Bell,  the  famous  outlaw  of 
the  old  days.  The  youth  '  that  shot  so  trim ' 
would  no  doubt  develop  into  a  skilful  archer 
whose  <  loosed  arrows ' 3  would  seldom  <  miss  the 
clout,' 4  but  '  cleave  the  very  pin.' 5  While 
drawing  he  would  shout  his  warning  to  all  to 
c  stand  wide  of  the  bow-hand,' 6  and  near  the  butts 
would  be  stationed  a  marker  who  '  gave  aim/ 7 
that  is,  showed  where  the  arrow  alighted.  Wide 
must  have  been  Shakespeare's  experience  in  this 
field.  Indeed,  under  the  influence  of  Ascham's 
YoxophiluSt  the  old  English  practice,  which  the 
goodly  scholar  describes  not  only  as  an  honest 
pastime  and  wholesome  exercise,  but  also  as  a 
branch  of  military  exercise,  this  practice  had 
regained  some  of  its  pristine  greatness.  So  it 
comes  about  that  the  poet's  allusions  to  this  branch 
of  country  divertisements  are  more  plentiful  than 
to  any  other  subject.  In  the  plays  of  Dekker  and 
Middleton,  and  most  of  all  in  those  of  Beaumont 
and  Fletcher,  terms  of  archery  often  occur,  yet 
none  of  Shakespeare's  contemporaries  seem  to 
have  been  so  much  impressed  as  he  was  himself 
by  the  renascent  sport. 

1  Much  Ado  about  Nothing,  i.  i.  251. 

2  Romeo  and  Juliet,  n.  i.  13.  3  Henry  V.,  i.  ii.  207. 

4  Ho-iv  a  man  may  choose  a  good  wife  from  a  bad   (Dodsley, 
Old  English  Plays,  vol.  ix.  p.  23). 

5  Romeo  and  Juliet,  n.  iv.  15.     6  Lo<ve*s  Labour  "s  Lost,  iv.  i.  134. 
7  <The  City  Gallant. 


120     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

The  labours  of  the  rustic  and  the  sports  of 
the  lusty  yeomen  in  Elizabeth's  reign  are  not  the 
only  reminiscences  to  be  found  in  Shakespeare's 
works  of  the  life  which  his  compatriots  led  at 
the  wane  of  the  sixteenth  century.  A  welcome 
rest  would  come  for  them  now  and  again  with 
one  of  the  many  festivals  and  '  gaudy  nights ' *  - 
the  remains  of  Popish  sway  over  the  old  Catholic 
England.  There  would  be  New  Year's  Day  with 
its  gifts2  of  oranges  stuck  with  cloves,  and  with 
its  wassail  scenes,  '  when  roasted  crabs  hissed  in 
the  bowl.' 3  Then  Shrove-Monday  with  its  sweet 
collops,4  and  Shrove-Tuesday  with  ever-tasty 
pancakes.5  Then  sheep-shearing,6  when  lamb-ale 
would  turn  many  a  merry  man's  head,  and 
children  would  stuff  their  cheeks  with  '  warden 
pies,  and  mace,  and  dates,  and  prunes,  and  a  race 
or  two  of  ginger.' 7  After  this  would  come  May- 
day with  its  masquerade  of  morris-dancers  around 
the  painted  pole  :  and  the  Whitsun  Pastorals8  with 
their  old-fashioned  show  of  mysteries.  Later  on, 
Michaelmas9  and  the  harvest-home,  with  the  merry 
music  which  accompanied  the  last  load  of  corn  ; 

1  Antony  and  Cleopatra,  in.  xi.  183. 

2  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  in.  v.  8. 

3  Love"1*  Labour's  Lost,  v.  ii.  915  j  crab  apples. 

4  Winter's  Tale,  I.  ii.  137. 

s  Airs  Well  that  Ends  Well,  n.  ii.  23. 

6  Winters  Tale,  iv.  ii.  37.  7  Cf.  Ibid.,  48  ff. 

8  Ibid.,  133.  9  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  i.  i.  200. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     121 

and  later  still,  on  the  eve  of  cold  November, 
Hallowe'en  with  its  puling  beggars.1  Then  at 
Martlemas  a  dim  ray  of  sunshine  would  light  up 

*  St.    Martin's    summer,  halcyon  days,' 2   and   at 
last,    Christmas    carols    and    Yule-tide's    '  pious 
chansons ' 3  would  bring  every  one  back  again  to 

*  shoeing  the  mare,  hoodman  blind,  hot  cockles,'4 
flapdragons,5  the  wassail-candle,6  and  the  punch- 
bowl which  had  inaugurated  the  year. 

All  these  festivals  and  a  few  more  beside,  such 
as  Lammas-tide,  Holyrood-day,  and  Easter-tide, 
are  mentioned  by  Shakespeare.  But  none  is  dealt 
with  in  such  loving  detail  as  the  merry-making 
which  took  place  in  summer  when  every  little 
village  had  'her  batchilers  and  damosels  tripping 
deftly  about  May-pols.'7  Bells8  and  ribbons, 
rings  and  napkins,  were  gaily  flaunted  as  their 
owners  moved  : 9  while  a  nosegay  pinned  on  his 
hat  and  a  good  suit  of  Lincoln  green  on  his  back 
made  every  yokel  feel  in  lordly  vein.  Then  was 
the  hour  for  Tib  and  Tim  to  tread  a  gay  measure 
and  to  indulge  in  a  '  gallimaufry  of  gambols ' 10  on 

1  Two  Gentlemen  of  Verona,  u.  i.  23. 

2  i  Henry  71.,  i.  ii.  131.  3  Hamlet,  n.  ii.  423. 

4  Middleton,  Father  Hubbard's  Tales,  p.  81. 

5  Love's  Labour  V  Lost,  v.  i.  45.  6  2  Henry  17.,  i.  ii.  157. 
7  Dekker,  Dead  Terme,  p.  22. 

*  Return  from  Parnassus,  in.  ii.     (Dodsley,  O.  E.  P.,  ix.  164.) 

9  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Women  Pleased,  iv.  i. 

10  Winter  s  Tale,  iv.  iii.  333. 


122     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

the  green  to  the  strains  of  the  *  Three-man  song- 
men  '  ; l  and  swiftly  past  the  shocked  Precisians 
would  they  sweep,  who  coldly  sang  'psalms  to 
their  hornpipes/  2  So  with  the  blowing  of  horns, 
with  mumming  and  flower-strewing  and  with 
riding  of  hobby-horses  3  would  the  revel  proceed 
— a  sight  of  Merry  England  which  ever  grew 
fainter  as  the  Puritans  grew  stronger  ;  for  a 
time  was  coming  '  when  the  hobby-horse  was 
forgot.' 4 

Farther  down  the  green  would  meanwhile  be 
standing  a  knot  of  spectators  applauding  c  the 
delightful  ostentation75  as  a  whole,  or  else  ad- 
miring the  pageantry  of  '  the  Nine  Worthies.' 6 
Another  bunch  of  heads  would  be  gathered  around 
a  quintain 7  post,  or  around  the  rustic's  game  of 
draughts  called  the  nine  men's  morris,  played 
by  the  yokels  on  ground-cut  squares.  Elsewhere 
they  would  be  crowding  round  wiry  William 
Visor  of  Wincot  as  he  '  turned  his  girdle,'  and 
challenged  sturdy  Clement  Perkes  of  the  Hill 8  to 
settle  their  dispute  in  a  friendly  wrestling  match. 
Such  impressions  of '  the  very  May-morn  of  his 
youth,' 9  Shakespeare  never  forgot,  and  as  late  a 

1  Winter's  Tale,  iv.  ii.  45.  2  Ibid.,  47. 

3  Ben  Jonson,  Every  Man  out  of  His  Humour,  n.  i. 

4  Cf.  Hamlet,  in.  ii.  143. 

5  Love's  Labour^s  Lost,  v.  i.  108.       6  Ibid.,  v.  i.  149. 

7  As  You  Like  It,  i.  ii.  246. 

8  2  Henry  17.,  v.  i.  42.  9  Henry  V.,  i.  ii.  120. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      123 

play  as  The  Winter  s  Tale  contains  lively  reminis- 
cences of  Jacob  and  Phillip's  smiling  feast.1 

The  poor  pelting  villages,  the  sheep-cotes  and 
mills,  the  vineyards  and  fallows,  the  meads  and 
hedges,  which  lay  outside  the  towns,  are  never 
described  in  detail  ;  neither  are  those  '  bosky 
acres  and  unshrubbed  downs,'  2  more  picturesque 
than  useful.  The  high-roads  were  wont  to  be  but 
rarely  repaired.  Travelling  was  a  hardship  owing 
to  4  the  foule  and  cumbersome  '  ways.  Bridges 
were  often  little  more  than  planks,  and  poor  Tom 
might  well  feel  proud  of  heart  at  riding  on  c  a  bay 
trotting  horse  over  four-inched  bridges/3  Over 
these  highways,  however,  would  go  the  packet- 
carrier,  always  a  man  of  many  letters.  From 
post-house  to  post-house  would  he  pursue  his 
tedious  way,  but  quickening  the  pulse  of  the 
countryside  as  he  went  ;  and  if  he  ever  sought 
'  horseway  or  footpath,'  4  all  the  greater  need  for 
caution  against  the  highwayman's  '  Lay-by.'  5 
He  would  meet  very  often  those  poor  heart- 
broken creatures  who  went  from  door  to  door 
with  their  clack-dish  or  alms-dish,  those  sordid 
beggars  who  but  seldom  '  upon  entreaty  have  a 
present  alms/  and  whose  horn,  that  alms-drink 


1  Cf.  also  Measure  for  Measure,  m.  ii.  203.     St.  Philip  and  St. 
James  were  the  patron  saints  of  the  ist  of  May. 

2  Tempest,  iv.  i.  81.  3  King  Lear,  in.  iv.  56. 
4  Ibid.,  iv.  i.  56.  5  i  Henry  IV.,  i.  ii.  36. 


i24     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

ought  to  fill,  was  most  often  dry.  He  would 
know  those  hapless  vagrants  upon  whom  the 
vigorous  Tudor  rule  pressed  hard  ;  the  beggar 
bearing  her  brat  upon  her  shoulders,  and  many 
other  such  cases  of  misery  undiluted.  Sometimes 
English  gipsies  would  cross  his  path  and  hasten 
his  pace  with  their  scowl.  For  they  were  c  red- 
ochre  rascals  umbered  with  soot  and  bacon,  who 
were  wont  '  to  lie  in  ambuscade  for  a  rope  of 
onions,  as  if  they  were  Welsh  freebooters.'1 
And  sometimes  he,  no  doubt,  would  overtake 
the  pedlar  with  his  *  silken  treasuries/  humming 
gaily  as  he  crept  by  the  hedges,  and  having 
accompanied  him  to  the  next  village,  would 
listen  awhile  to  him  wheedling  the  rustics  with 
his  enticing 

'  Come,  buy  of  me,  come  :  come  buy,  come  buy; 
Buy,  lads,  or  else  your  lasses  cry.' 2 

This  then  is  something  of  the  rustic  England 
of  Shakespeare's  day.  These  were  some  of  the 
passing  reflections  which  he  contrived  to  catch 
amid  scenes  where  Nature  was  most  bountiful. 
It  was  a  gallant  picture,  but  its  golden  visions 
were  doomed  to  fade  before  the  dour  looks  and 
heavy  sword  of  Cromwell  when  he  came. 

Perhaps  these  very  May-games  which  have  just 
been  mentioned,  with  their  songs  full  of  buoyancy 

1  Middleton  and  Rowley,  Spanish  Gypsy. 

2  Winter's  Tale,  iv.  iii.  230. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     125 

and  their  boisterous  masqueradings,  helped  to 
arouse  in  the  youthful  Shakespeare  the  impet- 
uosity of  his  poetic  feeling,  and  prompted  him  to 
carry  the  wanderer's  staff'  through  London  gates'1 
to  where  on  a  wider  stage  he  could  evolve  golden 
dreams  of  humour  and  philosophy.  The  year 
1585  or  1586  is  generally  supposed  to  have  been 
the  time  of  Shakespeare's  hegira,  when  he  left  the 
reposeful  country  life  for  the  hurry  of  the  town, 
and  commenced  his  work  under  the  new  condi- 
tions of  London  life.  London  and  its  ways  are 
well  reflected  in  his  works.  If  he  can  write  as  a 
native  of  England's  Midland  county,  he  is  also 
able  to  feel  himself  one  of  London's  adopted 
sons.  To  him  London  proved,  as  to  Spenser, 
'  a  most  kindly  nurse ' ;  and  the  whirling  metro- 
polis, in  which  he  spent  so  many  of  his  best  years, 
won  from  him  not  a  little  of  that  affection  it  is 
yet  wont  to  receive  from  those  who  live  within 
hearing  of  its  tireless  hum.  He  never  felt  it  in- 
cumbent upon  him  to  rail  at  the  city's  '  riot,  pride, 
and  sumptuous  cheer,7  or  to  warn  it  to  c  spend  less 
at  board  and  spare  not  at  the  door.'  It  is  true 
he  never  goes  out  of  his  way  to  mention  any 
places,  neither  does  he  handle  the  familiar  place- 
names  of  the  city  with  the  same  fondness  as  Lamb 
at  a  later  date  betrayed.  But  his  attachment  is 
evidenced,  nevertheless,  on  the  numerous  occasions 

1  2  Henry  VI.t  iv.  viii.  24.. 


126     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

on  which  he  brings  into  his  dramas  vivid  one- 
word  descriptions  of  well-known  localities.  He 
brings  his  Vanity  Fair  before  the  footlights  in  his 
own  way,  and  paints  glowing  pictures  of  tavern 
life,  with  its  orgies  and  its  brawls.  He  sketches 
dainty  gallants  and  their  mincing  mistresses  with 
unfaltering  and  unerring  touch.  Buckram  rogues 
and  shady  rascals  in  great  plenty  and  variety  come 
sneaking  by  on  his  stage.  He  sketches  their 
absurdities,  and  to  all  the  queer  characters  who 
thronged  the  city  pavements  he  is  for  ever  holding 
up  faithful  mirrors  wherein  they  may  see  their 
own  unhappy  contortions.  With  the  numerous 
shades  of  Elizabethan  purple  he  is  as  familiar  as 
a  fashionable  tailor,  and  he  consistently  displays 
an  expert's  acquaintance  with  all  the  details 
of  ladies'  wardrobes.  He  knows  all  the  follies 
of  gilded  youth.  No  quaintness  of  bearing  was 
too  absurd,  no  grandiose  utterance  too  empty,  for 
his  pen  to  touch  with  a  lively  humour.  The 
gaunt  author  of  Piers  the  Plowman  must  often 
have  stalked  up  the  Cornhill,  eyeing  with  sub- 
dued indignation  the  well-furred  and  the  sleek. 
Shakespeare,  without  doubt,  trod  the  same  beat 
for  the  whetting  of  his  wit  and  for  the  indulgence 
of  the  secret  Puck  that  was  harboured  within  him. 
Other  Elizabethan  dramatists  also  add  strokes 
innumerable  to  the  picture  of  London  life. 
Scarcely  one  but  takes  off  a  gallant  or  describes  a 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      127 

custom,  for  all  lived  in  London,  and  from  London 
drew  their  characters. 

Shakespeare  was  barely  past  twenty  when  he 
left  the  quiet  Warwickshire  lanes  ;  yet  the  con- 
trast between  the  thronged  streets  and  his  old 
haunts  appears  not  to  have  made  much  impression 
on  his  mind. 

'In  every  street/  said  Dekker,  'carts  and  coaches 
make  such  a  thundering  as  if  the  world  ran  on 
wheels ;  at  every  corner  men,  women,  and  children 
meet  in  such  shoals  that  posts  are  set  up  on  pur- 
pose to  strengthen  the  houses,  lest  with  jostling 
one  another  they  should  shoulder  them  down.' 1 

But  whereas  nearly  all  the  writers  of  the  age 
have  a  word  of  surprised  sarcasm  or  censure  for 
the  noise  and  turmoil  throughout  the  metropolis,2 
the  ragged  mob  that  haunts  the  Forum  after 
Caesar's  death,  is  the  only  instance  in  which 
Shakespeare  has  actually  represented  the  madden- 
ing strife  of  the  city. 

London  itself  and  its  various  quarters  are  only 
mentioned  incidentally,  so  far  as  they  come  to  the 
poet's  mind  in  connection  with  an  event  or  point 
of  his  dramas.  Like  all  other  sides  of  his  know- 
ledge, his  acquaintance  with  the  town  and  its 
inhabitants  is  only  shown  piecemeal,  here  and 
there.  Nowhere  is  there  a  direct  presentation  of 
the  English  capital  during  the  reign  of  the  last 

1  Dekker,  Seven  Deadly  Sins,  p.  50.        2  e.g.  Stubbes,  Gosson,  etc. 


128     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

Tudor  sovereign.  Glimpses,  however,  are  caught 
of  St.  Paul's,1  with  its  gallants  and  its  serving 
men ;  of  the  truncheoning  and  Tribulation  of 
Tower  Hill ; 2  of  the  druggist's  c  needy  shop '  at 
Bucklersbury 3  '  smelling  sweet  in  simple  time '  ;  * 
of  Haliwell,  near  Shoreditch,  with  its  consecrated 
Fount  ; 5  of  Pie-corner  and  its  sadlers,6  and  its 
poor  '  taking  in  their  meal  of  steam  from  cooks' 
stalls '  ; 7  of  Smithfield  and  its  jades  ;J  of  Holborn 
and  its  strawberries  ; 8  of  the  melancholy  Moor- 
ditch  9  and  the  low  haunts  of  Turnbull  St. ; 10 
of  Clement's  Inn,11  with  its  mad  students ;  the 
shady  quarters  of  Pickt-hatch  in  Clerkenwell  ; 12 
the  warlike  Mile-end,  the  exercise  ground  for  city 
soldiers  ;  Finsbury,  the  resort  of  citizen  archers  ; 13 
the  fashionable  Strand,14  with  Eastcheap,15  old 
Jewry,16  the  City  Mills17  and  Cheapside.18 

These   are  some   of  the   most   familiar   place- 
names  that  occur. 

1  z  Henry  IV.,  i.  ii.  52.  2  Henry  VIII. ,  v.  iii.  52  and  61. 

3  Romeo  and  Juliet,  v.  i.  42. 

4  Cf.  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  in.  iii.  70. 

5  Measure  for  Measure,  iv.  iii.  98.  6  z  Henry  IV.,  n.  i.  28. 

7  Alchemist,  i.  i.  8  Richard  III.,  in.  iv.  32. 

9  i  Henry  IV.,  i.  ii.  82.     10  2  Henry  IV.,  in.  ii.  311.     "  Ibid.,  15. 

12  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Knight  of  the  Burning  Pestle,  v.  i. 

13  Every  Man  in  His  Humour,  i.  i. 

!*  Henry  VIII.,v.  iii.  55.     Cf.  Middleton,  Father  Hubbard's  Tales, 
p.  77.  15  i  Henry  IV.,  i.  ii.  135. 

16  Every  Man  in  His  Humour,  i.  ii. 

17  Coriolanus,  \.  x.  31.  18  2  Henry  VI.,  iv.  ii.  74. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     129 

What  struck  the  poet  more  was  apparently 
the  gulf  that  separated  the  rustic  simplicity  of 
manners,  dress,  and  speech  from  the  studied 
affected  whims  and  denizened  wit  that  pervaded 
equally  the  Court,  the  city,  and  the  camp. 

With  the  quaint  manners  of  London  society 
as  they  came  before  him  time  after  time,  he  must 
have  been  astounded.  Those  young  gentlemen, 
'  who  would  be  sad  as  night,  only  for  wantonness/  l 
sad,  moreover,  *  with  a  too  odd,  as  it  were,  too 
peregrinate/2  melancholy,  must  have  excited  in 
him  a  healthy  laugh.  And  he  would  doubtless 
laugh  at  such  ideas  as  that  £  true  melancholy 
would  breed  your  perfect  wit '  ;  or  that  your  man 
in  melancholy  could  '  overflow '  into  *  half  a  score 
of  sonnets  at  a  sitting/  He  would  know  that  a 
traveller's  talk  was  a  choice  after-dinner  entertain- 
ment at  the  houses  of  the  great,  while  the 
knightly  host  would  suck  his  teeth  and  catechise 
'  my  picked  man  of  countries/8  But  he  must  often 
have  wondered  why  such  travellers  felt  it  incum- 
bent upon  them  *  to  lisp  and  swear  strange  suits  ' ; 4 
to  place  such  faith  *  in  tennis  and  tall  stockings '  ; 5 
and  to  exhibit  as  the  main  trophies  of  their  travels 
*  Spanish  blocks,  French  compliments,  and  German 

1  King  John,  iv.  i.  16. 

2  Lowes  Labour 's  Lost,  v.  i.  15. 

3  King  John,  i.  i.  193. 

4  As  You  Like  It,  iv.  i.  37. 
6  Henry  PIIL,  i.  iii.  30. 

I 


130     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

healths/1  He  makes  Touchstone  and  Rosalind 
laugh  heartily  at  such  perverted  exquisites  in 
the  Forest  of  Arden  ;  and  elsewhere  and  by 
other  hands  '  these  new  tuners  of  accents ' 2 
are  held  up  to  scorn.  Their  absolute  trust 
in  these  '  trim  vanities '  and  in  the  virtue  of 
travelling  was  everywhere  a  common  cause  of 
laughter.  They  are  described  as  doing  little  more 
in  life  than  <  enhancing  the  daily  price  of  tooth- 
picks and  making  sharp  beards  and  little  breeches, 
deities.'3  Lying,  too,  was  the  mark  of  the 
seasoned  traveller,  and  Fletcher  makes  one  of 
his  characters  confessedly  lie  in  order  to  prove 
his  qualifications  for  that  distinction.4  The  apish 
nation  of  Englishmen  <  limped  in  base  imitation 
after  the  report  of  fashions  in  proud  Italy,'  and 
were  constantly  being  censured  for  it  by  the  wiser 
of  their  fellows.  '  An  Italianate  Englishman  is 
an  incarnate  devil,'  wrote  Ascham,  and  Bishop 
Hall  in  his  duo  Vadis  supports  the  charge. 

The  '  pretty  fellows '  of  the  time  would  give 
plays  and  suppers  and  issue  loud  invitations  to 
acquaintances  out  of  their  windows  as  they  rode  by 
in  coaches.  Sir  Amorous  La-Foole 5  had  a  lodging 
in  the  Strand  for  this  very  purpose.  He  would 

1  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  faithful  Friend,  I.  i. 

2  Romeo  and  Juliet ,  n.  iv.  30. 

3  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Queen  of  Corinth,  u.  iv. 

4  Fletcher,  Fair  Maid  of  the  Inn,  n.  ii. 

5  Cf.  Jonson,  Silent  Woman,  i.  i. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     131 

watch  when  ladies  were  gone  to  the  china  houses 
so  that  he  might  meet  them  by  chance  and  give 
them  presents — to  be  laughed  at.  Such  picked 
gentlemen  would  '  tell  their  ladies  stories,  usher 
them  to  their  coaches,  lie  at  their  feet  at  masques, 
and  applaud  what  they  found  laughter  in.' 1  They 
would  learn  '  the  tricks  to  make  my  lady  laugh, 
when  she 's  disposed1 ; 2  they  would  be  ever  prone 
to  *  make  a  leg/  put  off  their  caps,  kiss  their  hands, 
and  say  nothing.3  When  they  were  wooing  they 
would  follow  after  True  wit.4  If  the  lady  loved 
wit,  they  would  give  her  verses — borrowed  from 
a  friend.  If  valour,  they  would  talk  of  their 
swords.  If  activity,  they  would  often  be  visible 
on  their  barbaries,  or  leaping  over  stools  for  the 
credit  of  their  backs.  If  she  loved  good  clothes, 
their  coats  would  be  their  dearest  acquaintances, 
and  they  would  take  more  thought  for  the  orna- 
ment than  for  the  safety  of  their  heads.  They 
would  admire  her  every  fashion,  would  be  ever 
comparing  her  to  some  deity,  and  would  invent 
dreams  to  flatter  her.  If  she  were  great,  they 
would  always  perform  second  to  her  ;  like  what 
she  liked,  and  praise  what  she  praised  :  and 
would  take  it  for  the  greatest  favour  if  she  would 

1  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Queen  of  Corinth,  I.  ii. 

2  Lovers  Labour's  Lost,  v.  ii.  466. 

3  Cf.  Airs  Well  that  Ends  Well,  ii.  ii.  TO. 

4  Cf.  Jonson,  Silent  Woman,  iv.  i.,  Truewit  to  Clerimont. 


1 32     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

vouchsafe  to  leave  her  civet-box  or  her  sweet 
gloves  behind  her.  For  '  a  wench  to  please  a 
man  comes  not  down  dropping  from  the  ceiling  as 
he  lies  on  his  back  droning  a  tobacco  pipe.' l 

When  not  in  feminine  society  they  would  flower 
their  little  knowledge  with  '  sweet  damn-me's/  and 
betray  their  lack  of  wit  by  replying  to  jests, c  ever 
good  i'  faith/ 2  or  if  of  a  personal  nature,  '  bitter 
i'  verity,  bitter/ 3  They  would  pray  to  be  shielded 
from  the  sin  of  blushing,  would  '  undo  '  many 
tailors,  seek  many  quarrels  and  go  near  to  fighting 
one,4  and  would  laud  foreigners  at  the  expense  of 
their  compatriots.  '  We  are  famous/  said  Chap- 
man, '  for  dejecting  our  own  countrymen/ 5 

A  fashionable  host  would  protest  much  in  con- 
versation, and  affect  melancholy  after  the  French 
fashion.6  He  would  c  not  smile  beyond  a  point/ 
lest  he  should  '  unstarch  his  look/  and  his  guests 
on  their  departure  would  receive  but  feeble  hand- 
shakes. If  he  were  literary,  he  would,  like  Sir 
John  Daw,7  dismiss  the  literature  of  the  world  in 
a  few  well-chosen  phrases.  Plutarch  and  Seneca 
might  be  to  him  '  grave  asses  ;  a  few  loose  sen- 
tences ;  that 's  all '  ;  Aristotle,  c  a  mere  common- 
place fellow '  ;  Tacitus  might  be  c  an  entire  knot '  ; 

1  Ben  Jonson,  Silent  Woman,  iv.  i.,  Truewit  to  Sir  Dauphine. 

2  Chapman,  Mons.  D1 Olive.  3  Ibid. 

4  As  You  Like  It,  v.  iv.  47.  6  Chapman,  The  Ball,  in. 

6  Cf.  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Queen  of  Corinth. 

7  Ben  Jonson,  Silent  Woman,  n.  ii. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     133 

Homer,  *  an  old,  tedious,  prolix  ass  that  talked 
of  curriers  and  chines  of  beef*  ;  Virgil,  c  of  the 
dunging  of  land,  and  bees.' 

If  he  had  been  a  courtier  he  would  pride  him- 
self on  having  trod  a  measure,  flattered  a  lady, 
been  politic  with  his  friend  and  smooth  with  his 
enemy.1  He  would  be  of  the  tribe  of  gal- 
lants and  '  dapper  Jacks '  made  in  the  schools  of 
fashion.  But  Nature,  when  she  was  pleased, 
made  him  otherwise.  '  I  cannot  make  you 
gentlemen,'  said  Beaumont,  *  that 's  a  work  raised 
from  your  own  deservings  ;  merit,  manners,  and 
inborn  virtue  does  it.' 2 

The  country  knight  would  often  travel  to 
London  in  his  roomy  caroch,3  or  in  his  quiet 
ambler,  '  to  learn  the  fashion/4  and  would  straight- 
way set  about  emulating  the  feats  of  the  town 
exquisites.  He  would  learn  how  to  walk  before 
a  lady,  and  how  to  bear  her  fan  with  dignity, 
how  to  kiss  his  hand5  with  effect,  how  to 
catechise,6  or  with  a  good  starched  face  to 
pick  his  teeth  when  he  could  not  speak.7  He 
would  learn  how  to  walk  the  streets  'his 
humours  to  disclose/ 8  He  would  have  to 

1  As  You  Like  It,  v.  iv.  42.          2  Beaumont,  Nice  Valour,  v.  iii. 

3  Cf.  Ben  Jonson,  Devil  is  an  Ass,  iv.  ii. 

4  Dekker,  Gulfs  Horn  Book,  p.  259. 

5  Lovers  Labour  V  Lost,  iv.  i.  145.  6  King  John,  I.  i.  192. 

7  Cf.  Ben  Jonson,  Every  Man  out  of  His  Humour,  i.  i. 

8  Rowlands,  Letting  of  Humours  Blood  in  the  Head*<vayne. 


1 34     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

bestow  some  '  time  in  the  tongues/ l  and  study 
for  many  a  painful  hour  the  art  and  science  of 
neat  quotation,  and  how,  with  well-placed  words, 
to  dissolve  my  lady's  riddles.2  Unless  he  were 
content  to  remain  a  carpet  knight,3  he  would  have 
to  acquaint  himself  with  'Saviolo  his  art  and 
phrases,'  and  would  have  to  front  '  passes  and 
stoccadoes,'  *  like  a  true  sword-and-buckler  man.5 
He  would  repair  with  this  intention  to  some  Low 
Country  soldier  6  and  see  him  foin  and  traverse  ; 7 
pass  the  punto,  stock,  reverse,  and  montant ; 8  and 
learn  the  rules  by  which  to  give  and  take  the  lie. 
He  would  learn  to  take  an  insult  when  one 
'  familiarly  disliked  his  yellow  starch/  said  that  'his 
doublet  was  not  exactly  Frenchified,  or  drew  his 
sword  and  said  it  was  ill-mounted/9  Then  honour 
would  lead  him  on — according  to  Saviolo.  He 
would  also  have  to  acquire  the  nimble  galliard,10 
lavoltas  high  and  the  swift  corantos,11  the  lively 
canary  and  Spanish  pavin,12  the  French  brawl,13  the 

1  Twelfth  Night,  i.  iii.  92. 

2  Cf.  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Elder  Brother,  HI.  v.  5  and  Queen 
of  Corinth,  I.  ii.  3  Twelfth  Night,  in.  iv.  242. 

4  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  n.  i.  217. 

5  i   Henry  W.,  i.  iii.  230. 

6  Lupton,  London  and  the  Country  Carbonadoed. 

7  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  n.  iii.  24.  8  Ibid.,  n.  iii.  26. 

9  Fletcher,  Queen  of  Corinth. 

10  Henry  V.,  i.  ii.  252  j  'Twelfth  Night,  i.  iii.  139. 

11  Henry  V.,  HI.  v.  33. 

12  Middleton,  Blurt,  Master-Constable,  iv.  ii. 

13  Love's  Labour  V  Lost,  in.  i.  9. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     135 

quick  capers  of  a  cinque-pace,1  and  all  the  subtle 
games  of  the  English  dancing  school,  which  were 
Sir  Christopher  Hatton's  first  steps  to  the  Wool- 
sack, and  *  to  which  the  Grecians  are  most 
prompt  and  pregnant.' 2  Besides  these  '  lofty 
lavoltos  and  tricks  of  intemperance,1  he  would 
see  other  measures  and  '  dances  of  order  and 
comeliness/3  At  the  end  of  a  galliard  the  gallants 
would  fetch  two  or  three  fine  capers  aloft  in 
taking  leave  of  their  mistresses  ; 4  and  he,  like 
many  others  disliking  such  passages,  would  pro- 
bably prefer  the  '  passy-measures  '  5  of  French  in- 
novation. All,  however,  were  highly  prized  at 
Elizabeth's  Court,  and  therefore  would  be  worth 
learning  even  though  they  seem  to  mean  with 
Shakespeare  not  much  more  than  the  pale  delight 
of  an  Aguecheek. 

Though  Shakespeare  never  definitely  draws 
the  picture  of  a  pretty  gentleman,6  who  wore  out 
six  fashions  in  four  terms,  yet  he  has  plainly  studied 
all  the  dress  details  of  such  a  one.  The  ruff,7 
adjusted  so  carefully  with  poking  sticks  8  of  steel, 

1  Muck  Ado  about  Nothing,  n.  i.  74. 

2  Troilus  and  Cressida,  iv.  iv.  86. 

3  Two  Wise  Men  and  all  the  rest  Fools,  vi.  i. 
*  Chapman,  A  Humorous  Day's  Mirth. 

5  Twelfth  Night,  v.  i.  206.     Corruption  of  the  Italian  '  passo- 
mezzo.* 

6  Fletcher,  Elder  Brother,  HI.  v.  7  Pericles,  iv.  iii.  105. 
8  Cf.  Marston,  Malcontent ;  Winters  Tale,  iv.  iii.  226. 


136     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

the  doublet  of  changeable  taffeta,1  the  short  satin 
cloak,2  the  damask-coloured  stock,8  and  yellow 
stockings  and  cross-garters,4  the  new  ribbons  to 
his  pumps,5  the  two  Provincial  roses  on  his  razed 
shoes,6  his  side  sleeves,  his  hose  and  slops 7  are  all 
introduced  at  different  times.  The  gallant's  daily 
visit 8 — his  debt  to  society — would  ever  be  made  in 
a  new  suit.  His  breath  with  sweetmeats  would 
be  tainted,  his  face  adorned  with  black  velvet 
patches  variously  cut.9  With  civet10  would  he 
perfume  his  hands,  with  Neapolitan  scent  sweeten 
his  person,  and  beautify  the  beautiful  by  the 
wearing  of  a  nosegay.11  His  collar  would  rise 
up  '  so  high  and  sharp  as  if  it  would  have  cut  his 
throat.'12  His  spurs  would  be  gilt,  his  boots  em- 
broidered, while  his  points  and  jetting  plumes 
would  eloquently  announce  his  high  distinction. 
His  chevril  gloves13  would  be  dressed  on  either 
side.  His  short  Italian  hooded  cloak  might  be 
'  larded  with  pearls ' ;  in  his  Tuscan  cap  might 
shine  a  jewel ;  his  bombast  lining  would  ensure 

I  Twelfth  Night,  ii.  iv.  74.  2  ^  Henry  IV.,  i.  ii.  30. 
3  3 nuelfth  Night,  I.  iii.  133.                            4  Ibid.,  n.  v.  170. 

5  Midsummer  Nighfs  Dream,  iv.  ii.  34.       6  Hamlet,  in.  ii.  279. 

7  Dekker,  Gulfs  Horn  Book  ;  Love's  Labour's  Lost,  IV.  iii.  59. 

8  Fletcher,  Elder  Brother,  in.  v. 

9  All's  Well  that  Ends  Well,  iv.  v.  96. 
'    10  As  You  Like  It,  in.  ii.  63. 

II  Midsummer  Nighfs  Dream,  I.  i.  34. 

!2  Middleton,  Father  Hubbard's  Tale  (vol.  v.). 
13  Twelfth  Night,  in.  i.  13. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     137 

his  bulk  and  consequently  his  importance.  His 
noblesse  compelled  him  to  wear  garters  of  gold  or 
silver,  for  '  men  of  mean  rank  wore  garter  and  shoe 
roses  worth  more  than  five  pounds/  His  pouncet- 
box  he  would  hold  tenderly  'twixt  his  finger  and 
his  thumb,  which  ever  and  anon  he  would  give 
his  nose.1  Prudence  might  hang  small  balls  of 
pomander  around  his  neck,  to  protect  his  person 
in  time  of  plague  ;  but  he  would  jauntily  display 
a  dancing  rapier2  and  make  a  brave  show  as  he 
advanced  to  his  hostess,  after  dismissing  his  link- 
boy  at  the  door. 

He  would  be  barbered  many  times  a  day.3  His 
hair  would  be  well  frounst  with  the  curling- iron.4 
He  might  affect  the  *  mowchatowes '  turned  up 
like  two  horns  towards  the  forehead.5  His  beard 
might  be  in  form  '  a  spade  or  bodkin,  a  pent- 
house on  the  upper  lip,  or  an  alley  on  the  chin.' 6 
It  could  curl  like  a  ball  or  have  dangling  locks 
like  a  spaniel.  The  moustache  would  be  sharp  at 
ends,  but  it  could  hang  down  to  the  mouth  like 
goat's  flakes.  But  to  wear  a  bushy  beard  was  to 
be  an  outcast.  His  beard  might  be  dyed  straw- 
colour,  orange-tawny,  or  purple-in-grain,7  but  it 
was  well,  at  all  costs,  to  be  bearded  ;  and,  if  Nature 

1  i  Henry  IV.,  i.  iii.  38.  2  Titus  Andronicus,  n.  i.  39. 

3  Antony  and  Cleopatra,  n.  ii.  229. 

4  Greene,  Quips  for  an  Upstart  Courtier  (1592). 

6  Stubbes,  Anatomie  of  Abuses.  6  Lyly,  Midas. 

7  Midsummer  Nighfs  Dream,  I.  ii.  89. 


138     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

had  denied  him,  the  barber  would  supply  him. 
Such  a  picked  fellow  would  have  not  a  hair  nor  an 
ornament  but  what  it  had  its  due  place  and  perfect 
appointment.  He  would  '  draw  out  his  pocket- 
glass  thrice  in  a  walk,  and  would  more  admire 
the  good  wrinkle  of  a  boot,  the  curious  crinkling 
of  a  silk  stocking,  than  all  the  wit  in  the  world/ l 

French  fashion-mongers  were  wont  to  <  sweat 
out  their  brains '  devising  new  fashions  for  such. 
It  was  thus  that  they  made  '  the  giddy-pated 
Englishman '  consume  his  revenues.  The  block 
for  the  gallant's  head-gear  altered  in  form  faster 
than  the  felt-maker  could  fit  him  ;  and  '  for  this 
reason/  quoth  Dekker,  '  are  we  called  in  scorn 
blockheads/  A  passing  craze  was  that  of  ear- 
rings.2 It  was  a  custom,  however,  that  did  not 
last ;  and  love-locks  on  the  forehead  tied  with 
ribbons  3  were  scarcely  more  lasting.  These  trim 
gallants  were,  in  short,  things  whose  souls  were 
'  specially  employed  in  knowing  where  best  gloves, 
best  stockings,  and  waistcoats  curiously  wrought '  * 
were  sold.  Their  favourite  haunts  were  milliners' 
shops  ;  the  art  of  shopping  their  chief  accomplish- 
ment ;  and  c  for  these  womanly  parts,'  quoth  a 
contemporary,  '  they  are  esteemed  with  gentle- 
men/ These  were  typical  gallants.  The  '  humor- 

1  Return  from  Parnassus,  Pt.  II.  HI.  iv. 

2  Fletcher,  Woman  Hater. 

3  Fletcher,  Cupid" s  Revenge,     i.e.  a  favourite  lock  of  hair  brought 
before  and  tied  with  ribbon.     Against  this  fashion  Prynne  wrote 
'The  Unlweliness  of  Lo<ve -locks.  4  Chapman,  All  Fools* 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     139 

ous'  gallant  could  be  more  unsightly  still.  CA 
rook '  would  think  to  affect  an  humour  by  wear- 
ing a  pyed  feather,  a  cabled  hat-band,  or  a  three- 
piled  ruff,  a  yard  of  shoe-tye,  a  Switzer's  knot  on 
his  French  garters,  which  would  be  *  more  than 
most  ridiculous/ l  He  would,  in  short,  do  any- 
thing and  think  it  adequately  accounted  for,  by 
stating  that  it  was  his  humour. 

In  speech  the  gallants  would  be  '  drawling, 
affecting  rogues ' 2  when,  indeed,  they  could  be 
induced  to  throw  off  their  nighted  colour  of 
melancholy.  They  would  be  *  lisping,  affecting 
fantasticoes,'  3  who  would  stand  much  on  form  and 
sometimes  '  affect  the  letter ' 4  to  attract  attention. 
Their  dress,  gaudy  in  colour,  fantastic  in  style,  found 
its  counterpart  intellectually  in  the  craze  for  Gon- 
gorism  which  existed  in  fashionable  circles.  A 
'rare,  compleat,  sweet,  nittie  youth15  would  cherish, 
'  odd  quirks  and  remnants  ' 6  of  the  wit  of  a  Lyly 
or  a  Harington,  and  would  lard  his  conversation 
with  their  borrowed  brilliance.  Odd  lines  from 
the  classics  would  be  recklessly  handled,  for  many 
such  exquisites  had  'a  learned  tendency,'  and 
though  ' they  spoke  no  Greek ' 7  they  would  c  love 
the  sound  on 't.'  To  '  talk  of  stones  and  stars, 

1  Ben  Jonson,  Every  Man  out  of  His  Humour,  Prol. 

2  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  n.  i.  140. 

3  Romeo  and  Juliet,  n.  iv.  29.      4  Love's  Labour  V  Lost,  iv.  ii.  56. 

5  Marston,  Satire  3  (1598). 

6  Much  Ado  about  Nothing,  n.  iii.  237. 
1  Fletcher,  Elder  Brother,  n.  i. 


1 40     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

planets,  fishes,  and  flies' ;  to  play  with  words  and 
idle  similes,  and  all  on  the  least  provocation,  was 
evidence  certain  of  a  fertile  wit  and  cultured  mind. 
Euphuism  in  itself  was  used  by  the  scholars,  and 
rightly  used,  produced  passages  of  striking  beauty. 
Shakespeare  laughs  at  the  mode  in  his  '  camomile ' 
passage,  aimed  at  the  degenerate  Gongorism  in  the 
person  of  Armado.  With  such  '  paper  bullets  of 
the  brain '  and  with  such  faded  humour  did  these 
gallants  bolster  up  their  barren  wit.  To  speak  as 
Nature  gave  them  utterance  would  have  been 
more  than  plebeian,  and  therefore  when  in  love 
they  would,  like  Lyly's  Sir  Tophas,  '  feel  all  Ovid 
de  arte  amandij  and  would  expand  to  a  page  what 
required  no  more  than  a  brace  of  words. 

The  vagaries  of  these  *  strange  flies,  these 
pardonnez-mois '  who  stood  so  much  on  the  new 
form  that  they  could  not  sit  at  ease  on  the  old 
bench/ 1  were,  in  their  turn,  taken  up  by  their 
mistresses.  That  fine  lady,  whose  health  he  would 
drink  kneeling,  and  for  whom  he  would  drink  off 
4  candles'  ends  for  flap-dragons/ 2  too,  aimed 
at  gallantry  and  bravery  of  dress.  '  If  men  got 
up  French  standing  collars/  said  Dekker, 3  '  the 
women  would  have  (them)  too  ;  if  doublets  with 
little  thick  skirts — women's  foreparts  are  thick- 
skirted  too.'  Ladies'  raiments  and  fads  were  no 

1  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Coxcomb,  i.  v.     Cf.  2  Henry  IV.,  v.  iii. 

2  2  Henry  IV.,  n.  iv.  249.  3  Seven  Deadly  Sins,  p.  59. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     141 

less  gorgeous  and  innumerable  than  those  of  the 
gay  younkers  who  buzzed  around  the  Queen. 
The  various  parts  of  costume  and  dress  mentioned 
by  Shakespeare  would  suffice  to  have  robed  in 
fashionable  apparel  the  Queen  herself;  though 
during  a  prolonged  stay  of  the  Scotch  envoy, 
Sir  John  Melville,  at  her  Court,  she  produced 
every  day  a  dress  of  some  different  country,  and 
her  wardrobe  contained  over  two  thousand  gowns, 
with  all  things  answerable.1  And  culling  from 
the  poet's  works  we  should  find  ample  material  to 
adorn  her 

'With  silken  coats,  and  caps,  and  golden  rings, 
With  ruffs,  and  cuffs,  and  farthingales,  and  things ; 
With  scarfs,  and  fans,  and  double  change  of  bravery, 
With  amber  bracelets,  beads,  and  all  this  knavery'2 

from  the  '  tailor's  ruffling  treasure.' 

The  details  pertaining  to  ladies,  such  as  their 
golden  quoifs  and  stomachers,  the  new  sits  for 
their  ruffs,  and  their  odd  tires  or  headdresses  of 
'  Venetian  admittance,'  their  ivory-handled  fans 

and 

1  Lawn,  as  white  as  driven  snow  ; 
Cyprus,  black  as  e'er  was  crow  ; 
Gloves,  as  sweet  as  damask  roses ; 
Masks  for  faces,  and  for  noses  ' ; 3 

these  things  are  frequently  found  with  the  creator 

1  Chamberlaine's  Epistolary  Notices  in  Harington's  Nuga  Antique, 
ed.  Park,  vol.  i.  p.  118. 

2  Taming  of  the  Shrew,  IV.  iii.  55  ff.     3  Winter's  Tale,  iv.  iii.  220  ff. 


1 42     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

of  Juliet,  Portia,  and  coquettish  Beatrice.  But 
all  their  artful  kickshawes,1  their  brooches  and 
owches,2  their  intertissued  robes  of  gold  and 
pearl,  their  pinked  porringers3  and  high  chopines,4 
their  false  hair  ravished  from  the  dead,5  their 
pomanders  and  table-books,6  the  perfumes  on 
their  breath,7  their  aglet-babies 8  and  pet  monkeys,9 
their  squirrels,  and  their  parrots, — these  are  hardly 
ever  described  by  Shakespeare,  much  less  ridiculed. 
Other  contemporaries  might  laugh  at  their  c  little 
crowne  hats'  so  blown  about,  their  great  deep 
ruffs,  their  farthingales  'which  so  like  breeches 
stood  about  them/10  the  great  sleeves  and  bom- 
basted  shoulders.  They  only  appear  in  Shake- 
speare as  illustrating  some  feature  of  a  heroine, 
or  characterising  in  precise  terms  the  appearance 
of  a  meaner  personage,  some  maid-in-waiting  or 
companion,  who,  with  other  authors,  would  have 
been  but  a  dim  and  lifeless  shadow.  Such  feminine 
garniture  as  c  the  velvet  cambricke  silken  feather'd 
toy,'11  the  head-gear  and  mantles,  cthe  coronets 
and  tires  of  several  fashions,  the  girdles,  spangles, 
rebatoes  and  tiffanies,' 12  the  carnation  ribbon,13 

I  Twelfth  Night,  i.  iii.  214.  2  2  Henry  IV. ,  11.  iv.  48. 
3  Henry  7111.,  v.  iii.  47.                *  Hamlet,  n.  ii.  434. 

5  Merchant  of  Venice,  HI.  ii.  98.     6  Winter 's  Tale,  iv.  iii.  603. 

7  Romeo  and  Juliet,  i.  iv.  76.  8  Taming  of  the  Shrew,  I.  ii.  79. 

9  Merchant  of  Venice,  in.  i.  120.      10  Stubbes,  Anatomie  of  Abuses. 

II  Burton,  Anatomy  of  Melancholy,  8th  ed.,  fol.,  p.  294. 

12  Rowlands,  Look  to  It,  or  I  *le  stabbe  Ye. 

13  Love's  Labour  V  Lost,  in.  i.  146. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     143 

the  *  muffs,  falling  bands,  and  periwigs * '  as  well  as 
*  the  glittering  caules  of  golden  plait ' 2  were  daily 
railed  at  from  pulpit  and  from  stage.  One 
Member  of  Parliament  feelingly  protested  to  the 
House  '  that  women  carried  manors  and  thousands 
of  oak-trees  on  their  backs/  and  every  husband 
knew  that  each  Royal  Progress  inaugurated  a 
new  fashion.  But  however  much  Shakespeare 
rated  the  male  frivolity  of  his  day,  he  always 
speaks  indulgently,  when  he  speaks  at  all,  of  the 
sumptuous  trifles  with  which  the  noble  ladies 
would  array  themselves.  Perhaps  it  was  the  dark 
lady  of  the  sonnets,  Mary  Fitton,  if  such  indeed 
were  her  name,  who  conveyed  to  her  poet-lover 
the  secret  that,  under  a  vain  Queen  the  ladies  of 
the  Court  must  needs  be  ever  beautiful,  and,  if 
necessary,  beautified  ;  and  also  that  to  them  c  the 
diamond  of  a  most  praised  water,'  3  and  '  coral 
clasps  and  amber  studs ' 4  were  as  natural  append- 
ages as  tawdry  lace  and  a  thrummed  hat 5  to  the 
shepherdess  Audrey,  or  lockram  to  the  kitchen 
malkin.6 

As  to  the  manners  of  these  dames  of  'high 
admittance,'  they  were  the  outcome  of  the  same 
age  as  produced  their  sumptuous  dress.  The 
lady,  '  full  of  comparisons  and  wounding  flouts,' 7 

1  Rowlands,  Look  to  It,  or  I  "le  stabbe  Ye.   2  Restituta,  vol.  iii.  p,  256. 
3  Pericles,  in.  ii.  102.  4  Passionate  Pilgrim,  366. 

5  Cf.  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  iv.  ii.  76.       6  Coriolanus,  u.  i.  222. 
7  Lovers  Labour  V  Lost,  v.  ii.  834. 


i44     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

would  '  carve ' l  or  make  signs  of  favour  with  the 
hand  to  the  gallant  she  wished  to  encourage. 
She  would  use  good  mouth-filling  oaths,  for  they 
well  became  her.  Feeble  exclamations  would  be 
left  to  '  comfit-makers'  wives '  and  *  rascally  yea- 
forsooth  knaves/  2  She  used  no  paint,  as  a  rule, 
to  bedaub  and  falsify  herself,  as  did  the  ladies  of 
Italy,  but  would  rejoice  if  her  hair  were  fair  ;  for 
raven  locks  were  out  of  favour  at  the  Court  of 
the  Virgin  Queen.  She  would  hack  the  Queen's 
English  right  well  in  conversation  with  a  gallant, 
and  would  keep  pace  with  him  in  all  his  excur- 
sions into  regions  of  florid  absurdity.  A  mask 
of  rich  taffeta  would  conceal  her  identity  in  a  place 
of  public  resort,  and  the  conceal  use  of  a  mask 
was  a  fine  point  in  coquetry.  Those  of  her  kind 
would  throw  their  '  sun -expelling  masks '  away, 
however,  and 

'Commit  the  war  of  white  and  damask,  in 

Their  nicely-gawded  cheeks,  to  the  wanton  spoil 

Of  Phoebus'  burning  kisses,'3 

when  processions  thronged  the  streets  to  honour 
warriors  returning  from  abroad. 

In  the  wake  of  these  Court  ladies  followed  a 
crowd  of  unworthy  parasites  who  vainly  tried  to 
move  at  the  same  pace,  and  who,  clad  in  garments 
of  silk  and  satin,  tried  to  mould  their  manners  after 

1  Merry  Wives  of 'Windsor ',  i.  iii.  43. 

2  i  Henry  W.,  in.  i.  250  ;  2  Henry  IF.,  i.  ii.  36. 

3  Coriolanus,  n.  i.  229  ff. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     145 

those  of  their  betters.  The  would-be  fashionable 
among  city  dames  would  *  line  a  grogram  gown 
clean  through  with  velvet/1  eat  cherries  only  at 
an  angel  a  pound,  and  thereby  arouse  the  envy  of 
her  neighbours,  the  scorn  of  the  well-born.  But 
with  her  *  mincing  niceties,  her  durance  pettitoes 
and  silver  bodkins/  all  patience  would  be  lost, 
and  the  tongues  of  all  her  more  stay-at-home 
sisters  would  thereupon  be  loosed  to  express  their 
disgust  and  give  vent  to  their  feelings. 

Separated  from  all  these  by  impassable  barriers 
of  class  distinction  came  the  lower  ranks  of 
society.  There  were  the  rogues  in  buckram  and 
camlet  suits  and  clouted  shoon  ;2  the  more  respect- 
able, but  scarcely  more  cleanly,  wearers  of  greasy 
aprons,  dowlas  shirts3  and  buff  jerkins.4  There 
were  the  Sunday  citizens  with  their  velvet  guards 5 
and  plain  statute-caps/ — the  hard-working  trades- 
men of  those  times,  who,  together  with  their 
hopeful  apprentices,  had  but  one  ambition,  and 
that  was  the  Alderman's  thumb-ring.7  They  could 
only  snatch  a  passing  hour  occasionally  to  play 
at  bowls,8  or  loggats,  to  bet  at  tray-trip 10  with 

1  Chapman,  Eastward  Hoe  !  i.  iv. 

2  i  Henry  IP.,  n.iv.zoij  Henry  mi.,v.i\i.%%;  2  Henry  ri.,iv.ii.  189. 

3  Antony  and  Cleopatra,  v.  ii.  210 ;  i  Henry  W.,  in.  iii.  71. 

4  i  Henry  W.,  i.  ii.  48.  5  Ibid.,  in.  i.  261. 

•  Lovers  Labour'' s  Lost,  v.  ii.  281.  7  i  Henry  W.,  ii.  iv.  342. 

8  Cymbeline,  n.  i.  54.  9  Hamlet,  v.  i.  94. 

10  Twelfth  Night,  n.  v.  197. 


146     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

costermongers,  or  to  stake  their  Edward  shovel- 
boards.1  Sometimes  the  elders  would  go  and 
cry  aim  to  the  Finsbury  archers 2  as  loyal  citizens 
should,  or  watch  '  Arthur's  show  ' 3  at  Mile-End 
Green,  while  the  rowdies  of  the  apprentices  would 
go  hack  at  a  football.4  Gallants  like  Bassanio 
and  Benedick,  gay  and  reckless,  were  ever  at 
liberty  to  pursue  pleasure.  They  could  always 
spend  an  hour  in  bowling-alleys  trying  to  make 
'  bias  and  thwart ' 6  answer  their  aim  in  spite  of 
all  rubs.  There  they  would  be  liable  to  meet 
with  ' attendant  rooks/  who  would  prove  their 
betters  and  win  with  advantage.  On  the  bowl- 
ing-green would  be  seen  a  variety  of  postures. 
Some  would  wring  the  neck  or  lift  the  shoulders 
after  they  had  set  the  bowl  rolling  ;  others  would 
clap  the  hands  or  lie  down  on  one  side,  while  others 
again  would  run  after  the  bowl  or  make  long 
dutiful  scrapes  and  legs,  as  if  entreating  it  to  flee.6 
But  men  of  such  standing  as  Bassanio  and 
Benedick  would  never  seek  the  base  football- 
players.7  It  was  a  game  in  which  tripping  and 

1  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  i.  i.  155  (  =  Broad  shillings  particularly 
used  in  playing  the  game  of  shovel-board). 

2  Ben  Jonson,  Every  Man  in  His  Humour,  i.  i. 

3  2  Henry  W.,  in.  ii.  284.     Justice  Shallow  was  Sir  Dagonet  in 
that  society  of  fifty-eight  citizens  known  as  *  The  Fellowship  of 
Arthur.'  4  King  Lear,  i.  iv.  87. 

6  Troilus  and  Cressida,  i.  iii.  15.     Cf.  J.  Taylor,  Wit  and  Mirth, 
Works,  part  ii.  p.  193. 

6  Cf.  J.  Taylor,  Wit  and  Mirth.  7  King  Lear,  i.  iv.  87. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     147 

hacking  were  fine  points  of  play,  and  the  challenge 
of  yokels  to  one  another  at  country  sports  would 
often  contain  among  other  items  the  offer  to  '  trie 
it  out  at  football  by  the  shinnes.'  They  could, 
however,  play  in  more  fashionable  company  at 
tennis,  gleek,  or  primero.'1  They  could,  in 
still  higher  circles,  break  a  lance  or  practise  tilts 
and  tournaments,2  or  they  might  perform  on  the 
viol-de-gamboys 3  at  a  mistress's  feet,  or  amuse 
themselves  with  the  cithern  in  a  barber's  shop. 
They  would  have  Spanish  jennets  to  ride4  and 
coaches5  in  which  they  might  loll,  flanked  by 
running  footmen — three-suited  knaves  6  who  wore 
the  badge  of  service7  and  trotted  by  the  wheel.8 
In  quieter  mood  they  might  visit  a  friend  and 
indulge  in  the  '  holly  hearbe  nicotion  ' 9  as  gallants 
were  wont.  They  would  draw  out  of  'a  little 
hollow  instrument  of  calcinated  clay ' 10  the  smoke 
of  that  new-found  herb,  from  the  Isle  of  Nicosia, 
wrapped  up  in  rolls.  The  apothecary  would  have 
infused  it  with  some  '  pestiferous  juice,' 10  and  the 
smoke  therefrom,  each  idle  smoker  would  either 

1  Henry  PHI.,  i.  iii.  30  ;  Midsummer  Nighfs  Dream,  HI.  i.  1505 
Henry  VIIL,  v.  i.  7.     Cf.  Alchemist,  v.  iv. 

2  i  Henry  VI.,  HI.  ii.  515  <Tcwo  Gentlemen  of  Verona,  i.  iii.  30. 

3  Twelfth  Night,  I.  iii.  26.  4  Othello,  i.  i.  113. 

5  Merchant  of  Venice,  in.  iv.  82.  6  King  Lear,  n.  ii.  16. 
7  Henry  V.,  iv.  vii.  100.  8  Titus  Andronicus,  v.  ii.  55. 
9  Lyly,  Woman  in  the  Moon,  in.  i.  Tobacco  not  mentioned  by- 
Shakespeare.  10  Daniel,  Queens  Arcadia. 


148     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

convey  out  of  his  nose  or  '  down  into  his  stomach 
with  a  whiff.'  They  would  discuss  perhaps  with 
some  non-smoking  friends  the  merits  and  de- 
merits of  the  c  filthy  roguish  tobacco/ l  while  all  the 
time  c  it  would  do  a  man  good  to  see  the  fume 
come  forth  at  their  tonnels.'  A  travelled  gallant 
among  them  would  have  seen  it  grow  in  the 
Indies,  where  Bobadil  and  a  dozen  more  had 
lived  on  the  £  fumes  of  the  simple  ' l  for  twenty- 
one  weeks.  He  would  praise  it  as  an  antidote  to 
the  most  deadly  plant  of  Italy,  and  could  speak, 
though  he  were  no  c  quack-salver/  of  its  virtues 
in  expelling  '  rheums,  raw  humours,  crudities  and 
obstructions/ x  Another  would  explain  that  it 
was  received  *  in  the  courts  of  princes,  the 
chambers  of  nobles,  the  bowers  of  sweet  ladies, 
and  the  cabins  of  soldiers/  2  and  would  dare  his 
fellows  to  malign  so  sweet  an  herb.  Uncon- 
vinced, the  others  would  reply  that  the  wicked 
drug  was  good  for  nothing  but  to  '  choke  a  man 
and  fill  him  full  of  smoke  and  embers.' l  They 
would  know  of  four  deaths  in  one  house,  of 
recent  date,  caused  by  the  herb ;  and  would 
recollect,  with  one  another's  aid,  that  the  cbell 
went  yesterday '  for  two  more  such  cases.  They 
might  quote  an  instance  where  a  man  c  had  voided 
a  bushel  of  soot '  and  would  in  the  end  advocate 

1  Every  Man  in  His  Humour,  HI.  ii. 

2  Chapman,  Mons.  D'Olive. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     149 

whipping  for  the  crime  of  smoking  ;  '  for  in  the 
end  it  will  stifle  all,  as  many  as  use  it.' 

There  were  a  few  resorts  at  which  people  of  all 
ranks  and  occupations  would  meet  occasionally. 
There  were  the  Paris  Gardens  in  Southwark,1 
whither  one  would  cross  by  boat  and  listen  now 
to  the  waterman's  cheery  cry  of  Westward  Ho  ! 
at  other  times,  to  his  magnificent  abuse  of  a 
brother-waterman  who  obstructed  his  way.  In 
the  Gardens  would  be  the  old  baboon  '  drest  up  in 
a  coate  of  changeable  cullers ' 2  and  pursued  *  with 
a  couple  of  curs  muzled/  a  sight  which  elicited 
yells  of  delight  from  the  colliers  and  carters  of 
Southwark.  To  Shakespeare  the  '  angry  ape  which 
played  such  fantastic  tricks  before  high  heaven  ' 
as  made  angels  weep,  suggested  sadder  thoughts. 
He  saw  in  it  a  pitiful  sight  of 

*  Man,  proud  man, 
Drest  in  a  little  brief  authority.'3 

There  it  was  that  Master  Slender  saw  the 
famous  bear,  Sackerson,4  encompassed  with  dogs, 
stand  and  fight  the  course.5  An  objectionable 
place  it  was !  The  very  noise  of  the  surround- 
ings put  Dekker  in  mind  of  hell ;  '  the  bear 
showed  fight  like  a  black  rugged  soul  that  was 
damned  .  .  .  the  dogs  like  so  many  devils  in- 

1  Henry  Fill.,  v.  iii.  2.      *  Dekker,  Workefor  Armorours,  pp.  97-8. 

3  Measure  for  Measure,  11.  ii.  117. 

4  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  i.  i.  287.  5  Macbeth,  v.  vii,  2. 


150     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

flicting  torments  upon  it  ...  but  in  the  end  they 
commonly  were  crushed,  and  were  either  carried 
away  with  ribs  broken  and  skins  torn  (and  hang- 
ing about  their  ears),  or  else  .  .  .  they  stood 
whining  and  barking  at  their  strong  adversary 
when  they  durst  not  bite  him/ l  There  was  the 
Thames  itself,  where  gallants  in  their  barges  would 
row  in  state  by  the  boats  of  city  merchants  and 
their  dames,  and  seek  some  safe  retreat  where  they 
could  sing  their  catches  and  display  their  polished 
wit  before  their  honoured  fair  ones.  Sometimes 
carousals  would  be  held  on  ships  moored  to  the 
bank  before  or  after  great  events,  as  when  Drake 
singed  the  Spanish  beard.  And  sometimes  too 
the  Queen  herself  would  gild  the  waters  as  she 
glided  in  her  royal  barge  from  Richmond  to 
Whitehall  amid  a  blaze  of  gaily  attired  courtiers 
and  silken  nymphs,  just  like  another  Cleopatra. 

Then  there  was  the  annual  Bartholomew  Fair 
with  its  threadbare  but  nimble  jugglers  who 
deceived  the  eye 2  and  loosened  the  purse-strings ; 
with  its  troops  of  fortune-tellers,3  ape-bearers,4 
teeth-drawers5  and  tumblers,6  not  to  mention  the 
gypsies  playing  their  game  of  '  fast  and  loose ' 
and  Bankes'  famous  dancing  horse.7  At  the 

1  Dekker,  Worke  for  Armorours,  pp.  97-8. 

2  Comedy  of  Errors,  i.  iii.  98.  3  Ibid.t  v.  i.  24.0. 
4  Winter 's  Tale,  iv.  ii.  96.           5  Lovis  Labour  V  Lost,  v.  i.  611. 
6  Ibid.,  in.  i.  190.  7  Ibid.,  i.  ii.  54. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     151 

Fair,  lords  and  ladies,  citizens  and  'prentices, 
would  all  crowd  round  the  pig-dressers'  booths,1 
call  for  c  little  tidy  boar- pigs  piping  hot ! ' 2  and 
would  scarce  be  called  away  by  the  merriest  of 
brawls.  Pedlars  would  be  quarrelling  over  right 
of  station,  cut-purses  pursuing  their  busy  trade, 
Puritans  canting  of  sin  and  error,  and  besotted 
yeomen  reeling  here  and  there.  However,  none 
of  these  resorts  were  known  as  well  as  '  Paul's ' :  3 
*  the  great  Exchange  of  all  discourse,  .  .  .  the  Synod 
of  all  pates  politicke,  .  .  .  the  Theeves  Sanctuary,4 
the  home  of  "  vilJanous  meetings,  pernicious  plots, 
and  black  humours."'5  '  The  noise  in  it  was  like 
that  of  bees/  said  a  contemporary  ;  '  a  strange 
humming  or  buzz,  mixed  of  walking,  tongues, 
and  feet.' 4  Here  the  merchants  would  walk  twice 
a  day,  and  with  their  ceaseless  laughter  imply  that 
they  were  sound.6  Coney-catchers  looked  about 
for  pigeons  to  pluck ;  stale  knights  and  captains  out 
of  service,  who  lived  upon  mouldy  stewed  prunes 
and  dried  cakes,7  would  feel  c  Humphrey  Hour '  j 
glide  past  and  *  walk  their  dinner  out ' 9  round 

1  Cf.  Jon  son,  Bartholomew  fair. 

2  Cf.  2  Henry  17.,  n.  iv.  234.  3  Henry  17.,  i.  ii.  52. 

4  Earle,  Microcosmography,  p.  52  passim. 

5  Middleton,  Black  Book  (Works,  vol.  viii.  p.  32). 

6  Lupton,  London  and  the  Country  Carbonadoed ',  p.  275. 

7  2  Henry  17.,  n.  iv.  146. 

8  Richard  III,  iv.  i.  175. 

9  City  Match  (Dodsley,  ix.  335). 


152     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

the  good  Duke's  Tomb/ l  while  blush-coloured 
doublets  ranging  down  the  '  Mediterranean  He,' 2 
the  Insula  Paulina,  would  brush  against  the  grey 
coats  of  cashiered  mates  in  quest  of  a  new  master.3 

*  What   plots    are   there    laid    to    furnish   young 
gallants    with    ready    money !  '    mused    another 
contemporary.      <  What  swearing    is    there,   yea, 
what    swaggering,  what   facing   and   out-facing  ! 
What  shuffling,  what  shouldering,  what  jeering, 
what    biting  of  thumbs   to   beget  quarrels,  what 
holding    up  of    fingers    to    remember    drunken 
meetings  ! ' 4     Outside  the  building  would  be  the 
churchyard  through  which  were  approached  the 
bookbinders'    shops.      There  would   be    gallants 

*  with  big  Italian  look  and  Spanish  face,'  asking 
for  books  in  Spanish  and  Italian.     They  would 
turn  the  books  upside  down,  look  at  the  titles, 
wrinkle  their  brows,  and  with  their  nails  score  the 
margins    '  as    though    there    were    some    notable 
conceit.'     Lastly,    they    would   throw  the   books 
away  in  a  rage,  swearing  that  they  '  could  never 
find  books  of  a  true  print.' 6 

Amongst  the  motley  crowd  of  idlers  and  busy- 
bodies    moving  under   the   fretted   vault  of  the 

1  Those  who  had  no  means  of  procuring  a  dinner  often  loitered 
about  Duke  Humphrey's  monument  at  St.  Paul's.     Humphrey  of 
Gloucester  was,  contrary  to  general  belief,  really  buried  at  St.  Albans. 

2  The  middle  aisle  of  Paul's  is  called  the  '  Mediterranean  He,' 
Dekker,  GuWs  Horn  Book.  3  Ram  Alley  (Dodsley,  x.  341). 

4  Dekker,  Dead  Terme,  pp.  49-51. 

5  Return  from  Parnassus,  Part  II.  n.  iii.  3. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     153 

cathedral,  Shakespeare  may  well  have  discovered 
his  dashing  Gratiano,  his  fantastic  Lucio,  his 
humorous  Nym  and  shapely  Ned  Poyns ;  his 
Grumio,  his  Parolles,  and  Pistol  parading  patches 
on  c  cudgelled  scars ' l  begotten  in  Gallia  wars. 
Thence  also  the  poet  may  have  gathered  many 
features  for  the  life-size  portrait  of  the  fat 
knight  himself,  who  might  well  have  strolled 
through  the  alleys  of  the  cathedral  after  he  had 
caudled  his  morning  taste  '  to  cure  his  overnight's 
surfeit.1 2  In  the  wake  of  his  huge  spurs  would, 
perhaps,  be  following  some  common  gamester,3 
some  deep  conceited  cut-purse  or  cheating  bowler  4 
or  perhaps  a  devouring  catchpole,5  for  thieves  did 
foot  by  day  as  well  as  night.6 

But  it  is  more  especially  with  contemporary 
authors  that  we  find  such  '  cogging  caitiffs ' 
haunting  the  church  and  the  exchange.  Shake- 
speare more  often  alludes  to  them  in  their  more 
familiar  domains  around  the  dice-box  where 

'  Gourd  and  fullam  holds, 
And  high  and  low  beguile  the  rich  and  poor.' 7 

All  these  '  cavaleroes  about  London ' 8  form,  as 
it  were,  a  background  to  the  monumental  figure 

1  Henry  V.,  v.  i.  90.  2  Timon  of  Athens,  iv.  iii.  226. 

3  Airs  mil  that  Ends  Well,  v.  iii.  187. 

4  Middleton,  Black  Book,  p.  3 1 . 

5  J.  Taylor,  A  Nauy  of  Land  Shippes,  p.  91  ff. 

6  Merry  Wi<ves  of  Windsor,  u.  i.  122. 

7  Ibid.,  i.  iii.  94  (names  of  false  dice). 

8  2  Henry  W.,  v.  iii.  62. 


154     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

of  the  stout  knight ;  they  are  the  elements  out 
of  which  the  great  creation  arose.  And  this  is 
true,  whether  FalstafF  is  taking  his  ease  in  his 
inn,  with  its  quaintly- named  rooms,1  amid  those 
Corinthians  2  of  his,  mostly  in  the  third  degree  8  of 
drink  and  amid  his  court  .  of  drawers,  tapsters, 
ostlers,  voyders,  and  under-skinkers  ; 4  or  whether 
he  is  laying  bare  in  thoughtful  mood  the  philo- 
sophy of  honour.  In  any  case,  around  his  com- 
fortable figure  Shakespeare  has  sketched  a  picture 
with  background  and  foreground  more  widely 
and  accurately  topical  than  we  find  elsewhere  in 
his  whole  gallery.  His  brother  dramatists  may 
dwell  rather  more  than  he  does  on  the  actual 
manners  and  customs  of  the  time.  But  in  those 
tavern  scenes  where  Prince  Hal  carouses  with  his 
'  sweet  creature  of  bombast ' 5  Shakespeare  is 
supreme,  not  only  in  his  own  age,  but  in  every  age. 
That  c  pottles  of  burnt  sack  with  toast  in  it,' 6 
with  lime  and  sugar  too,7  that  flagons  of  Rhenish,8 
stoups  of  claret,9  canakins  of  sherris,10  or  Malmsey,11 
and  cups  of  Madeira 12  were  quaffed  by  the  guests 

1  Cf.  ' Bunch  of  Grapes'    (Measure  for   Measure ;   n.    i.    128). 
Dolphin  chamber   (2    Henry  IV.,  n.  i.  89).       The    Half   Moon 
(i  Henry  17.,  n.  iv.  30). 

2  i  Henry  W.,  n.  iv.  12.  3  Twelfth  Night,  i.  v.  132. 
4  i  Henry  IP.,  n.  iv.  26.  6  Ibid.,  n.  iv.  338. 

6  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  II.  i.  208  and  in.  v.  3. 

7  i  Henry  17.,  n.  iv.  150.  8  Hamlet,  v.  i.  186. 

9  2  Henry  VL,  iv.  vi.  4.  10  2  Henry  W.,\v.  iii.  in. 

11  Love's  Labour's  Lost,  v.  ii.  233.       12  i  Henry  W.,  i.  ii.  119. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     155 

at  Yaughan's 1  near  the  Globe,  or  by  those  at  the 
Boar's  Head,2  the  Elephant,3  the  Porpentine,4 
the  Rose,5  the  White  Hart,6  the  Pegasus,7  or  the 
Mermaid8 — all  this  we  can  gather  from  other 
authors.  For  beer  and  wine  were  taken  at  every 
meal,  and,  *  if  sack  and  sugar  be  a  fault,  God  help 
the  wicked,'  quoth  Falstaff.  But  none  of  the  several 
dramatists  whose  scenes  are  laid  in  such  '  ordi- 
naries,' convey  to  us  an  adequate  notion  of  those 
small  worlds  behind  the  ivy-bush  and  red-lattice,9 
where,  outside,  the  picture  of  *  we  three ' 10  swayed 
in  the  wind,  and  inside,  on  smirched  worm-eaten 
tapestries,11  Cain  and  Judas  would  bristle  with 
beards  of  the  dissembling  colour  ;12  Hercules  would 
rest  on  his  massy  club,11  or  the  '  story  of  the 
Prodigal,  fresh  and  new,'13  and  the  German 

1  Hamlet,  v.  i.  61.  Cf.  Ben  Jonson,  Every  Man  out  of  His 
Humour,  v.  iv.  j  'one  Yohan.1  2  i  Henry  IV.,  n.  iii. 

8  Twelfth  Night,  in.  iii.  4.9.  4  Comedy  of  Errors,  in.  i.  116. 

6  Henry  nil.,  i.  ii.  152.  6  2  Henry  71.,  iv.  viii.  25. 

7  Return  from  Parnassus,  Pt  II. 

8  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Wit  without  Money,  n.  iv. 

9  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  n.  ii.  25. 

10  Twelfth  Night,  n.  iii.  17.     A  picture  of  two  asses  or  fools,  or 
wooden  heads,  inscribed  with  one  of  the  scrolls  *  We  three  *  '  Nos 
Sumus,"1  or  *  We  three  loggerheads  be,'  was  a  common  device  on 
sign-boards.  n  Much  Ado  about  Nothing,  in.  iii.  135. 

12  Cf.  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  i.  iv.  23,  and  As  You  Like  It,  in. 
iv.  8.  In  remembrance  of  the  mystery  plays,  red  and  yellow  hair 
and  beard  were  the  recognised  appendages  of  Judas  and  Cain  re- 
spectively in  pictorial  representations. 

is  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  iv.  v.  8. 


156     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

hunting  in  water-work *  would  speak   out  their 
unheeded  tales. 

Other  dramatists  do  not  bring  up  so  vividly 
the  sea-coal  fires,2  the  joint  stools,3  the  cosy 
lower  chairs,4  my  '  bully- rook ' 5  the  host,  the 
familiar  tapster,  the  double-dealing  customer,  the 
brawler  '  most  potent  in  potting/  Sneak's  music 6 
that  fiddled  to  catches  of  Green  Sleeves  or  Peg- 
a-Ramsey,  the  Ancient  blurting  out  in  swagger- 
ing vein  rough  scraps  of  Kyd  and  Peele  ; 7  the 
Corporal  whose  zeal  burned  in  his  nose ; 8  those 
gay  suppers  with  the  buoyant  '  bona  roba ' 9  brim- 
ming over  alternately  with  love  and  oaths  ;  the 
voyder  clearing  the  table  for  cards  or  dice  amid 
the  brawling  of  Proface!  Preface!10  Reminiscences 
of  even  the  Steelyard,  that  famous  German 
hostelry  in  London,  are  associated  with  the  mortal 
Knight.  It  is  there  that  the  '  swag-bellied  Hol- 
lander ' n  could  find  his  homely  Dutch  dish  half 
stewed  in  grease  ; 12  and  perhaps  the  c  swaggering 
upspring'13  reeled  at  Hamlet's  Danish  Court 
would  unconsciously  evoke  memories  of  Teutonic 
merry-making,  the  '  Hupfauf '  in  which  '  your 

1  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  iv.  v.  8,  and  2  Henry  IV.,  u.  i.  148. 

2  2  Henry  W.,  n.  i.  90.  3  Ibid.,  n.  iv.  251  j  folding-chairs. 

4  Measure  for  Measure,  n.  i.  127. 

5  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  n.  i.  188. 

G  Cf.  2  Henry  W.,  n.  iv.  12  }   =thc  band.          7  Ibid.,  n.  iv.  165. 
*  Ibid.,  n.  iv.  335.  9  Ibid.,  in.  ii.  24. 

10  Ibid.,  v.  iii.  30.  n  Othello,  n.  iii.  78. 

12  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  in.  v.  113.  1S  Hamlet,  i.  iv.  9. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     157 

German ' l  would  indulge  at  this  same  Hanseatic 
Hall. 

Many  a  company  of  *  merry  Greeks ' "  and 
c  Ephesians  of  the  old  church ' 3  in  those  days 
would  end  their  revels  with  the  bursting  of  glasses 
—for  *  glasses,  glasses,  is  the  only  drinking/ 4 
and  the  three-hooped  pot5  and  covered  goblet6 
were  then  no  longer  in  fashion.  At  many  such 
a  gathering  a  boon  companion  would  place  his 
weapon  on  the  table,  saying,  '  God  send  me  no 
need  of  thee,'  who,  *  by  the  operation  of  his  second 
cup/  would  draw  it  on  the  drawer,  when  indeed 
there  was  no  need.7  And  then  would  ensue  one 
of  those  nightly  brawls,  when  lights  would  be 
extinguished  and  swords  unsheathed  and  Doll 
Tearsheet  would  draw  her  knife  and  threaten  to 
thrust  it  into  her  neighbour's  '  mouldy  chops.* 
But,  after  all,  this  is  but  one  side  of  the  picture. 
Every  '  red-lattice  '  did  not  run  with  blood  ;  and 
it  is  probably  only  to  bring  Falstaff  and  the  royal 
comrade  of  his  bouts  into  stronger  relief,  that 
this  aspect  of  the  inns  and  their  management  is 
emphasised  by  Shakespeare.  The  desperate  orgies 
which  cost  Marlowe  his  life  may  have  left,  with 
his  young  collaborator,  tearful  memories,  but  to 

1  OtheUo,  ii.  iii.  77.  2  Middleton,  A  Mad  World,  i.  ii. 

3  2  Henry  W.,  n.  ii.  150.  4  Ibid.,  n.  i.  146. 

5  2  Henry  VI.y  iv.  ii.  68.  6  As  You  Like  It,  HI.  iv.  24. 

7  Romeo  and  Juliet ',  ill.  i.  7. 


158     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

drown  this  sorrow  and  redeem  these  scenes  there 
came  those  glorious  nights  at  the  c  Mermaid ' 
when  words  were  exchanged 

4  So  nimble  and  so  full  of  subtle  flame, 
As  if  that  every  one  from  whence  they  came, 
Had  meant  to  put  his  whole  wit  in  a  jest, 
And  then  resolved  to  live  a  fool  the  rest 
Of  his  dull  life.'1 

Moreover,  the  excellent  name  for  hospitality  which 
English  inns  even  then  bore,  was  widely  known. 
Such  *  ordinaries  '  were  cleanly  and  well  managed, 
and  if  they  enclosed  much  rough  humour,  they 
also  fostered  much  sparkling  wit.  They  were  the 
only  rendezvous  for  '  the  most  ingenious,  most 
travailled,  and  most  phantastic  gallants.  They 
were  the  Exchange  for  newes  out  of  all  countries. 
They  were  the  only  booksellers'  shops.  And 
lastly,  they  were  a  school  in  which  all  were 
fellows  of  one  form.' 2 

If  many  of  the  usual  surroundings  of  the  ale- 
house are  not  touched  upon,  the  picture  which 
Shakespeare  gives  us  is  yet  a  tolerably  full  one, 
even  to  the  ever-lurking  sheriff  and  his  '  blue- 
bottle'3 following,  who  appeared  on  the  scene  when 
the  '  hue  and  cry'4  had  followed  certain  individuals 
unto  Mistress  Quickly 's  house.  Nowhere  is  the 
poet's  touch  so  happy  as  when  he  concerns  him- 

1  Beaumont  writing  to  Jonson.  2  Dekker. 

3  2  Henry  W.,  v.  iv.  24.  4  i  Henry  IF.,  n.  iv.  519. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     159 

self  with  such  scenes.  LanglancTs  vivid  ale- 
house sketches  —  full  of  the  most  exquisite 
humour,  rough,  simple,  and  direct, — leave  in 
their  way  little  to  be  desired.  But  Shakespeare 
advanced  one  step  and  more  on  Langland's 
achievement.  The  dramatist's  scenes  of  devilry 
are  just  as  broad  and  as  naive  as  those  of  the 
priest ;  but  in  point  of  detail,  in  warmth  of 
colouring,  and  in  sheer  abandon  there  can  be  no 
real  comparison. 

From  the  tavern-life  of  London  to  its  seamy 
side  is  no  great  leap.  At  times  they  overlap. 
And  both  find  a  clear  reflection  in  the  dramatist's 
pages.  Many  a  scheming  lawyer  and  criminal 
doctor,  many  a  butterfly  gallant  and  soldiering 
desperado  would  walk  the  way  that  led  to  New- 
gate l  and  to  such  other  compulsory  resorts  as 
the  Marshalsea 2  and  the  Fleet.3  Of  such  places 
there  were  several  in  London,  and  each  had 
different  wards  for  the  accommodation  of  all. 
There  was  a  '  knight's  ward ' 4  for  the  fallen 
dignitaries,  a  '  twopenny  ward ' 5  for  the  leaner 
kind.  Whippings  were  frequent,  fees  were  paid 
by  the  prisoners  if  Fortune  ever  liberated  them, 
while  criminals  were  taken  to  execution  at  the 
cart's  tail,  or  dragged  thither  on  a  hurdle.  These 

1  i  Henry  IV.,  ill.  iii.  95.     2  Henry  VIII.,  v.  iii.  85. 

3  2  Henry  IV.,  v.  v.  92.        4  Marston,  Eastward  Hoe !  v.  ii.  44. 

*   Ibid.,  49. 


160     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

were  the  places  where  only  to  be  out  of  elbows 
was  in  fashion,  and  where  beggar  and  knight 
railed  on  Fortune  together.1  That  much  sad 
humour  hung  over  such  places  cannot  but  be 
inferred  from  Shakespeare's  descriptions  ;  for 
scenes  of  pitiable  plight  are  revealed  again  and 
again,  but  always  through  a  never-failing  dia- 
phanous veil  of  humour.  Behind  the  prison 
bars  Master  Rash,2  the  heyday  amoroso  of  a  brief 
hour,  and  Master  Caper,3  in  his  frayed  suit  of 
peach-coloured  satin,  both  unable  to  pay  the 
gaoler's  fees,4  would  sigh  and  chafe  amid  the 
oaths  rapped  out  by  Master  Forthright  the 
tilter,6  together  with  Masters  Copperspur,  Deep- 
vow,  and  Starve-lackey,6  '  men  of  long  rapiers  and 
breeches ' 7  all.  c  Young  Drop-heir  that  killed 
lusty  Pudding/ 8  and  *  wild  Half-can  that  stabbed 
Pots/  would,  no  doubt,  be  singing  their  swagger- 
ing snatches  ;  while  all  alike  would  spend  some 
part  of  their  day  begging  at  the  grated  windows, 
and  appealing  to  the  passers-by  with  their  whining 
'For  the  Lord's  sake.'9  At  times  'the  fatal 
bellman'10  would  bring  the  bitterness  of  death 
before  them  as  he  rang  his  handbell  in  front  of 

1  Earle,  Microcosmography,  p.  58. 

2  Measure  for  Measure,  iv.  iii.  5.  3  Ibid.,  9. 

4  Winter's  Tale,  i.  ii.  53.         8  Measure  for  Measure,  iv.  iii.  17. 
6  Ibid.,  14.  7  Earle,  Microcosmography,  p.  52. 

8  Measure  for  Measure,  iv.  iii.  15.  9  Ibid.,  19. 

10  Macbeth,  n.  ii.  3. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     161 

the  condemned  cell,  and  exhorted  the  prisoner 
to  repentance — an  office  which  a  pious  Merchant 
Taylor  had  recently  endowed.  It  is  not  without 
significance,  however,  that  Shakespeare,  in  describ- 
ing the  inside  of  a  prison,  represents,  out  of  four 
prisoners  mentioned,  four  convicted  for  stabbing. 
This  form  of  violence,  towards  the  end  of  Eliza- 
beth's reign,  became  more  common  than  pleasant, 
and  in  the  first  year  of  her  successor's  reign 
a  Statute  of  Stabbing  was  passed.  But  the 
wretches,  thus  '  fettered  in  base  durance  and  con- 
tagious prison/  kept  without  food  and  tor- 
mented, were  not  of  one  pattern.  Misfortune 
had  placed  some  where  crime  had  led  the 
others.  And  the  insolvent  debtor,1  deprived  of 
his  liberty,  and  the  poor  prisoner  carried  off 
by  a  cruel  fever,2  would  evoke  in  Shake- 
speare a  more  pitying  sentiment  than  did  those 
whose  sentence  was  the  strappado,8  the  rack,4  or 
the  cart5  that  toiled  up  Holborn  Hill6  to  the 
Thief's  Gallows,7  or  to  the  Murderer's  Gibbet8  at 
Tyburn  ; 9  while  the  memory  of  former  religious 

1  Cf.  Cymbeline,  in.  iii.  34. 

2  Measure  for  Measure,  iv.  iii.  70.     Gaol  fever,  which  raged 
throughout  the  prisons  until  the  reign  of  George  in. 

3  i  Henry  W.,  n.  iv.  247.  *  Measure  for  Measure,  v.  i.  313. 

5  i  Henry  W.,  n.  iv.  546. 

6  Lupton,  London  and  the  Country  Carbonadoed,  p.  12. 

7  As  You  Like  It,  HI.  ii.  325.  8  Macbeth,  iv.  i.  66. 
9  Love's  Labour -V  Lost,  iv.  iii.  51. 

L 


1-62     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

persecutions,  which  had  dragged  many  a  victim 
to  the  stake,  drew  from  him  the  scathing 

lines : — 

'  It  is  an  heretic  that  makes  the  fire, 
Not  she  that  burns  in  Jt.' l 

Leaving  these  fever-stricken  haunts,  where 
honest  hearts  were  daily  broken,  and  vice  was 
duly  punished,  we  find  yet  a  few  more  shades 
of  sordid  London  life  reflected  in  the  works  of 
the  great  bard.  In  a  sickly  death-march  of 
metaphor  and  comparison,  there  wander  across 
the  stage  the  whole  army  of  the  lost  and  friend- 
less in  London  :  the  blind  man  who  strikes 
round  him  and  beats  the  post,  when  'twas  the 
boy  that  stole  his  meat ; 2  the  beggar  woman  who 
steals  children ; 3  the  beggars  married  under  a 
bush 4  with  a  rush  on  their  forefingers ; 5  the 
foolish  beggars 

4  Who,  sitting  in  the  stocks,  refuge  their  shame, 
That  many  have,  and  others  must  sit  there ' ; 6 

the  punks,  the  death's-heads 7  or  procuresses  ;  and 
lastly,  the  Bedlamites.  These  last,  with  their 
faces  grimed  with  filth,  with  blankets  upon  their 
loins,  their  hair  all  elfed  in  knots,  step  into  the 

1  Winter's  Tale,  n.  iii.  115.      2  Much  Ado  about  Nothing,  II.  i.  195. 
3  2  Henry  PL,  iv.  ii.  145.  4  As  You  Like  It,  in.  iii.  82. 

6  All  V  Well  that  Ends  Well,  n.  ii.  23. 

6  Richard  II.,  v.  v.  25. 

7  i    Henry   17.,   HI.  iii.    35.     So  called  from  the  ring  with  a 
memento  mori  on  it  worn  by  these  women. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     163 

foreground  of  the  canvas  when  Edgar  assumes 
the  role  of  'poor  Tom.1  All  their  canting  invoca- 
tions, their  erratic  babblings  and  gestures  are 
employed,  though,  leavened  by  the  very  fact  of 
the  disguise,  they  are  not  without  a  touch  of  the 
glamour  that  poetry  always  gives. 

To  one  section  of  the  unfortunate,  however, 
Shakespeare's  unbounded  pity  went  out.  Those 
'  indigent  faint  souls,  past  corporal  toil,' l  those 
suffering,  honest  paupers  in  the  almshouse2  and 
the  Spital,3 

'  Who  twice  a  day  their  wither'd  hands  hold  up 
Towards  Heaven,' 4 

praying  God  to  *  save  the  foundation,' 6  were 
tearfully  touched  by  the  great  dramatist ;  and  the 
sighing  jest  of  forlorn,  wandering  Imogen  seems 
to  breathe  the  poet's  serious  wish  that  those 
havens  of  refuge  for  toil-worn  souls  might  never 
'  fly  the  wretched.' 6  And  who  does  not  recall 
in  this  connection  the  bent  figure  of  a  brave  old 
warrior,  who  was,  later  on,  to  utter  his  '  adsum ' 
for  the  last  time  within  one  such  God-sent 
shelter? 

The  ineffectual  efforts  to  suppress  '  ingenious, 

1  Henry  7.,  I.  i.  17.  2  Ibid.,  16. 

3  Timon  of  Athens,  iv.  iii.  39.  4  Henry  7.,  iv.  i.  316. 

5  Much  Ado  about  Nothing,  v.  i.  324.    Some  commentators  take 
these  words  to  be  the  formula  of  thanksgiving  uttered  by  those 
who  received  alms  at  religious  houses. 

6  Cymbeline,  in.  vi.  7.; 


164     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

foolish,  rascally  knaves ' x — such  vagabonds  as 
Abram  men,  dummerars,  counterfeit  cranks,2  and 
the  like — by  shackling  their  heels  in  the  stocks,3 
or  by  castigating  them  at  the  high-cross,4  do 
not  escape  the  poet's  gentle  smile.  For  rogues 
could  evade  the  famished  correctioner,5  and  the 
unlettered  scoffer  in  the  play  exclaims,  c  If  all 
your  beggars  were  whipped,  I  would  wish  no 
better  office  than  to  be  a  beadle.' 6 

Of  those  '  blue-bottle  rogues/ 7  the  beadles, 
whose  business  it  was  to  track  rascals  and  whip 
beggars,  there  is  much  rich  satire  in  the  drama- 
tists, as  also  of  their  brother  officers,  the  Watch. 
The  well-meant  attempts  at  citizen  government 
lent  themselves  easily  to  burlesque  from  their 
ponderous  assumption  and  their  futile  results. 
The  town-crier,8  the  whiffler,9  who  cleared  the 
way  for  processions,9  the  sexton,  who  whipped 
out  the  dogs,  and  the  bellman 10  as  well,  went  clad 
in  the  dignity  befitting  such  limbs  of  the  law  ; 
and  they  find  in  consequence  a  fitting  place 
in  Shakespeare's  metaphors  and  similes.  When 

1  All's  Well  that  Ends  Well,  v.  ii.  25. 

2  Dekker,  Bellman  of  London.     Madmen  of  the  type  of  Tom  o' 
Bedlam,  feigned  mutes,  and  men  who  pretended  to  have  *  the  falling 
sickness ' — epileptic  fits. 

3  Ibid.,  p.  89.  4  Taming  of  the  Shrew,  i.  i.  132. 

6  2  Henry  IV.,  v.  iv.  23.  6  Pericles,  u.  i.  92. 

7  2  Henry  W.,  v.  iv.  22.  8  Hamlet,  in.  ii.  4. 
9  Henry  7.,  Prol.  12.                    10  Macbeth,  n.  ii.  3. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     165 

Dogberry's  companion  gives  instructions  to  the 
Watch  to  silence  crying  babies,  Shakespeare  is 
laughing  at  that  Statute  of  the  Streets,  1595,* 
which  forbade  a  man  to  whistle  after  the  hour 
of  nine,  or  '  any  artificer  making  great  sound ' 
to  work  after  that  time.  It  also  forbade  sudden 
outcries  of  any  kind  in  the  night,  whether  they 
arose  from  c  affrays,  or  the  beating  of  wives  or 
servants,  or  singing,  or  revelling.'  But  backed 
up  as  it  was  by  an  antiquated  and  timid  Watch, 
the  statute  was  but  little  enforced,  and  the  breach 
of  the  statute  added  a  glow  and  an  excitement 
to  neighbourly  life  which  previously  had  not  been 
altogether  wanting.  '  Quiet  hurly-burlies ' 2  would 
continue  to  be  fought,  and  fought  for  hours, 
amongst  those,  of  whom  not  one  was  c  so  imperti- 
nent as  to  ask  the  reason  why.'  For  the  Watch 
would  be  f  drawing  in  diligent  ale,  and  singing 
catches,' 3  and  Master  Constable  would  be  c  con- 
triving the  toast,' 3  while  danger  was  threatening 
the  city's  peace.  When  brawls  would  arise,  the 
citizens  themselves  took  the  law  into  their  own 
hands.  They  kept  their  weapons  in  readiness,  as 
did  the  apprentices,  and  at  the  cry  for  '  bats  and 
clubs/  4  they  would  follow  the  scent,  and  lay  about 
them  to  overawe  the  combatants,  despite  head- 

1  Cf.  Much  Ado  about  Nothing,  HI.  in.  64.     See  also  p.  87. 

2  Love's  Pilgrimage.      3  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Coxcomb,  n.  iii. 
4  Cf.  Coriolanus,  i.  i.  161  j  and  Romeo  and  Juliet,  I.  i.  80. 


1 66     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

borough1  or  tharborough,2  or  any  such  officer. 
Shrove  Tuesday  was  the  day  on  which  appren- 
tices were  specially  busy.  They  made  it  their 
business  to  storm  places  of  evil  repute ;  the  law 
would  limp  behind,  but  it  was  not  uncommon 
to  hang  a  '  pewterer's  prentice  on  a  Shrove 
Tuesday's  riot.'3 

The  Watch  were  not  discerning  in  their  judg- 
ments. They  would  put  the  wrong  man  in  the 
stocks,  and  depart  their  ways  with  mutual  in- 
junctions to  remember  their  respective  duties,  and 
'  go  sleep  in  the  fear  of  God.' 4  They  were 
charged  to  '  comprehend  all  vagrom  men,1  and 
'  to  bid  any  man  stand,  in  the  prince's  name.' 5  If 
he  refused  to  stand,  they  had  this  consolation—- 
they were  *  rid  of  a  knave.' 6  They  were  to  make 
no  noise  in  the  streets,  but  sleeping  would  not 
offend  ;  they  were  only  to  have  a  care  lest  their 
bills  were  stolen.  If  they  met  a  thief,  they  were 
to  suspect  him,  but  to  let  him  show  his  true 
character  by  stealing  out  of  their  company  ; 
'twere  best  so,  for  peace  sake.  There  can  be 
no  wonder  that  c boxing  the  Watch '  was  long 
after  a  midnight  amusement  for  gallant  blood, 
and  that  the  contemporary  young  gentleman 
fleshed  his  sword  in  merry  moments  on  these 

1  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Faithful  Friends,  I.  ii. 

2  Loves  Labour "s  Lost,  i.  i.  183.         3  Jonson,  Silent  Woman,  i.  i. 
4  Marston,  Dutch  Courtesan. 

6  Much  Ado  about  Nothing,  in.  iii.  25.  Q  Ibid.,  30  ff. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     167 

sleepy  guardians  of  the  public  safety.  The  magis- 
trates were  oftentimes  scarcely  more  intelligent, 
and  the  logic  of  the  bench  is  reflected  in  more 
than  one  place.  *  Peace,  varlet,  dost  chop  with 
me  ? '  exclaimed  one  incompetent  magistrate  to 
an  innocent  man  brought  before  him.  '  I  say  it 
is  imagined  thou  hast  murdered  Lysander.  How 
it  will  be  proved  I  know  not.  Thou  shalt  there- 
fore presently  be  led  to  execution.'1 

Leaving  now  some  of  the  manifold  phenomena 
of  London  life,  as  they  appear  reflected  in  dramatic 
creations,  we  have  to  look  out  for  a  similar 
treatment  of  the  contemporary  professional  life, 
together  with  the  trades  and  humbler  occupations. 

It  is  clear  from  the  first,  that  Shakespeare's 
sympathies  lay  almost  entirely  with  those  who 
followed  professions  rather  than  trades.  Phy- 
sicians and  surgeons,  lawyers,  schoolmasters 
and  soldiers,  all  had  some  attraction  for  him, 
and  they  are  treated  in  his  pages  with  the 
respect  that  befitted  their  respective  callings.  To 
the  many  toilers,  however,  his  attitude  was  differ- 
ent. Their  roughness  and  uncouthness  had  for 
him  the  virtue  of  humour,  but  the  necessity  which 
compelled  them  to  be  '  garlic-eaters '  and  to  wear 
'  greasy  aprons,'  seems  to  have  set  up  an  effectual 
barrier  of  reserve  between  them  and  him.2 

1  Chapman,  Widow's  Tears. 

2  Leo,  Shakespeare  Das  Volk  und  die  Narren  (Shak.  Jahrbuch,  vol. 
xv.  1880). 


1 68     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

With  regard  to  medical  matters,  he  exhibits  a 
wide  acquaintance,  but  the  methods  of  treatment 
he  occasionally  reflects  would  probably  have  flat- 
tered the  age,  as  for  instance  in  the  music 
prescribed  to  soothe  the  '  untuned  and  jarring 
senses '  of  that  '  child-changed  father,'  Lear. 
For  the  remedies  of  contemporary  medicoes 
savoured  all  of  Galen's  prescriptions,  which  were 
but  £  empiricutic.' x  It  seems  indeed  as  if  '  the 
spells  and  medicines  bought  of  mountebanks ' ' 
did  not  greatly  differ  from  the  drugs  of  the 
master  doctors  of  the  day.  Balsamum,3  aqua- 
vitae,4  bitter  pills5  of  coloquintida,6  or  rhubarb,7 
eisel8  (or  vinegar)  against  strong  infection,  in- 
fusions that  dwelt  in  '  vegetives ' 9  which  had 
4 won  their  virtue  under  the  moon/  and  'many 
simples  operative '  whose  power  would  close  the 
eye  of  anguish,10  all  formed  part  of  the  average 
pharmacopoeia.  For  aching  bones11  there  would  be 
cataplasms  ;  patches  would  be  used  for  cudgelled 
scars  ; 12  plaster  and  salve  for  aching  soles,13  and 
plaintain  leaves14  for  broken  shins.  c  Rose-cheeked 
youth'  was  often  brought  down  to  the  fasting- 

I  Cf.  Coriolanus,  11.  z.  122.  2  Othello,  I.  iii.  62. 
3  Comedy  of  Errors,  iv.  i.  89.  4  Ibid. 

6  Two  Gentlemen  of  Verona,  H.  iv.  147.            6  Othello,  i.  iii.  350. 

7  Macbeth,  v.  iii.  55.  8  Sonnets,  cxi.  10. 
9  Pericles,  in.  ii.  36.  10  King  Lear,  iv.  iv.  14. 

II  Romeo  and  Juliet,  n.  v.  65.  12  Henry  P.,  n.  ii.  116. 

13  King  John,  v.  ii.  13.  14  Romeo  and  Juliet ,  i.  ii.  52. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     169 

diet *  by  the  barber-surgeon,  who  also  might 
discipline  his  patients  in  tubs  *  heated  smoking 
hot.'2  Diseases  in  the  body  and  fever  in  the 
blood  were  cured  by  incision3  or  leeches.4  But 
all  seasons  were  not  favourable,  and  medical  al- 
manacs would  infallibly  name  the  right  months 
for  bleeding.5  The  quacks  were  often  but  thieves 
in  disguise.  When  '  the  highways  grew  thin 
with  travellers'  they  would  settle  at  inns  and 
cozen  the  guileless  while  talking  of  cures. 

Master  Doctor  Caius  was  possibly  an  overdrawn 
portrait  of  the  '  renowned  French  physician  ' 6  of 
the  day.  The  original  may  have  been  Elizabeth's 
medical  adviser,  Dr.  Julio,  or  Dr.  Mayerne- 
Turquet  ;  for  the  latter  was  a  well-known 
professor  of  medicine  whose  long  flowing  periwig 
and  black  velvet  Parisian  pourpoint  became  asso- 
ciated in  English  minds  with  a  foreign  doctor. 
An  apothecary  would  often  be  one  cin  tattered 
weeds  with  overwhelming  brows.' 7  His  c  needy 
shop '  would  be  stocked  with  such  things  as  tor- 
toises, stuffed  alligators  and  fish  of  various 
kinds,  while  his  shelves  would  hold  '  a  beggarly 
account  of  empty  boxes,'  earthen  pots,  and  musty 

1  'Timon  of  Athens,  iv.  in.  87. 

2  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Knight  of  the  Burning  Pestle. 

3  Laves  Labour V  Lost,  iv.  iii.  95. 

4  Antony  and  Cleopatra,  v.  i.  36.  5  Cf.  Richard  II.,  I.  i.  157. 

6  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  in.  i.  61. 

7  Romeo  and  Juliet,  v.  i.  40  ff. 


170     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

seeds,  remnants  of  pack-threads  and  old  cakes 
of  roses — all '  thinly  scattered  to  make  up  a  show/ 

Many  common  complaints  were  named  then  as 
now;  but  the  'web  and  pin'1  was  an  ailment  of  the 
eye,  hysteria  was  best  known  as  '  mother/ 2  while 
nervous  complaints  were  vaguely  attributed  to  the 
wilful  ways  of  Nimble  spirits  in  the  arteries.'3 
Experiments  on  living  animals  were  not  unknown 
at  that  day.  When  the  Queen  in  Cymbeline 
would  try  her  drugs,  she  suggests  '  such  creatures 
as  we  count  not  worth  the  hanging ' 4  for  the  ex- 
periment ;  and  the  physician's  caution  to  her,  that 
from  the  practice  she  would  but  make  hard  *  her 
heart,  probably  represented  more  than  a  solitary 
opinion  on  the  still-vexed  question  of  vivisection. 

The  lawyer,  in  the  next  place,  was  a  familiar 
figure  in  Elizabethan  life,  with  his  quiddities  and 
his  quillets,  his  cases,  his  tenures  and  his  tricks  ; 5 
and  the  attorney  who  clutched  ten  groats  as  his 
fee,6  the  notary  with  his  inkhorn,7  the  judge, 
and  jury  who  '  may  in  the  sworn  twelve  have  a 
thief  or  two  guiltier  than  him  they  try,'8  the 
bailiff  or  nuthook,9  the  crowner,10  and  scrivener,11 

1  King  Lear,  in.  iv.  118.  2  Ibid.,  n.  iv.  56. 

3  Love's  Labour  V  Lost,  iv.  iii.  303.  4  Cymbeline,  i.  vi.  20. 

5  Hamlet,  v.  i.  107  ff.  6  All's  Well  that  Ends  Well,  ii.  ii.  21. 

7  Merchant  of  Venice,  i.  iii.  145. 

8  Measure  for  Measure,  u.  i.  20. 

9  Winter's  Tale,  iv.  ii.  97  j  also  2  Henry  IV.,  v.  iv.  8. 

10  Hamlet,  v.  i.  24.  n  Taming  of  the  Shrew,  iv.  iv.  59. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     171 

all  represent  that  section  of  the  Elizabethan  world 
to  which,  more  than  to  any  other,  Shakespeare  owed 
a  number  of  figurative  details.  Frequent  are  the 
allusions  made  to  the  profession ;  and  those  made  to 
its  deeds  and  scripts,  its  covenants 1  and  tenements,2 
actions  of  battery 8  and  actions  of  slander,4  fines, 
recoveries,5  and  contempt  of  court,6  fee-simple 7  and 
fee-farm,8  customary  rights,9  bonds,10  manual- seal n 
and  recognizances,12  are  a  few  samples  gathered 
indifferently  from  an  exuberance  of  technicality, 
and  witness  to  a  detailed  knowledge  which  would 
have  done  no  discredit  to  one  with  a  legal  training. 

As  a  sign  of  legal  dignity  the  sheriff"  would 
have  a  stout  post 13  erected  before  his  door,  upon 
which  proclamations  would  be  set  up,  to  be  read 
by  the  people  bareheaded  There  would  be  civic 
gatherings  which  he  would  adorn,  and  when  he, 
no  doubt,  would  feel  the  importance  and  dignity 
of  his  office. 

Nor  was  a  lawyer's  life  made  up  solely  of  dry- 
as-dust  days.  In  the  vacation  he  would  be 
notoriously  idle,  and  leave  what  little  work  there 
was  to  his  man,  who,  like  Master  Woolfe,  would 

1  Hamlet,  i.  i.  94.  2  Henry  fill.,  in.  ii.  343. 

3  Measure  for  Measure,  n.  i.  177.          *  Ibid.,  179. 

5  Comedy  of  Errors,  n.  ii.  75.  6  Winter's  Tale,  iv.  iii.  740. 

7  All's  Well  that  Ends  Well,  iv.  iii.  275. 

8  Troilus  and  Cressida,  in.  ii.  50.          9  Richard  II.,  n.  i.  196. 
10  Timon  of  Athens,  u.  i.  34.  u  Richard  II.,  iv.  i.  25. 

12  Hamlet,  v.  i.  108.  13  Twelfth  Night,  i.  v.  147. 


172     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

hold  that  c  theirs  was  the  best  religion '  who  paid 
their  fees  best ;  the  consciences  of  such  were  never 
examined.  The  more  settled  of  the  lawyers 
would  sleep  between  term  and  term,  and  dream 
of  their  days  at  Clement's  Inn,  when  a  clique 
of  swashbucklers  did  what  they  liked,  and  '  did 
it  soundly  too.'  At  other  Inns  of  Court  as  well, 
it  was  a  roystering  life  that  the  students  led, 
and  many  of  them  spent  years  in  the  lawyer's 
Bohemia,  before  they  could  settle  as  citizens  doing 
their  duty  by  Church  and  State.1 

The  information  collected  from  the  dramatic 
writings  with  regard  to  the  teachers  of  the  day 
and  their  methods,  is  also  by  no  means  insig- 
nificant. Of  the  renowned  erudites  and  masters 
who  played  a  conspicuous  part  in  this  era  of 
Humanities  and  new-born  Science,  no  reminiscence 
is  found,  though  perhaps  there  is  some  hint  of 
the  movement  generally  in  Shakespeare's  Love's 
Labour  'j  Lost.  Their  dogmatic  ways  are  perhaps 
aimed  at  in  a  careless  manner  when  he  throws 
his  darts  at  the  '  little  Academe,' 2  where  the  King 
and  his  fellow-scholars  endeavoured  to  consort 
in  c  leaden  contemplation.' 3  The  ushering  parson, 
Sir  Hugh  Evans  of  Windsor,  has  been  identified 

1  Cf.  Jonson,  Earthokmenu  Fair,  Induction. 

2  Love's  Labour  "s  Lost,  I.  i.  13.     Perhaps  Shakespeare  was  also 
aiming  at  the  Earl  of  Northumberland's  *  Philosophical  Academy, 
plainly  enough  satirised  by  Lodge  and  Greene. 

3  Ibid.,  iv.  iii.  318. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     173 

with  a  distinct  personality,  as  was  explained  in  the 
preceding  chapter,1  but  he  was,  no  doubt,  in  some 
degree  representative  of  the  lowlier  kind  of  tutor 
of  that  day^  There  were  also  braggart  peda- 
gogues who,  like  Holofernes,  had  *  been  at  a  great 
feast  of  language  and  stolen  the  scraps  '  : 2  pedants 
that  kept  school  in  the  church,3  or  in  the  room 
over  the  church-porch  ;  also  ladies'  schoolmasters 
1  well  seen  in  music.' 4  These  are  the  types  of 
this  honourable  profession  upon  which  the  dramatic 
fancy  mainly  rested. 

The  boy  who  attended  the  grammar-school  of 
the  time  would  have  much  to  do  with  the  Usher, 
who  was  himself  but  '  a  great  schoolboy,  with  a 
little  beard  and  black  clothes.' 5  Such  a  one  would 
know  better  '  how  to  whip  a  scholar  than  to 
learn  him,  for  if  he  had  been  fit  for  anything  in 
the  University  he  had  not  left  her  so  soon.1 
Education  implied  tears  then.  It  was  often  more 
stern  than  effective.  '  For  whereas  they  make  one 
scholar,  they  mar  ten/  said  a  contemporary ; 6  and 
one  country  pedagogue  would  whip  his  boys  on 
a  cold  winter's  morning  *  to  get  himself  into  a 
heat.' 

With  all  these  burrs  of  trial  and  tribulation 
clinging  thickly  to  him,  the  whining  schoolboy 

1  See  p.  75.  2  Love's  Labour 'V  Lost,  v.  i.  37. 

3  Twelfth  Night,  in.  ii.  81.         4  Taming  of  the  Shrew,  i.  ii.  133. 
5  Lupton,  London  and  the  Countrv  Carbonadoed.  6  Peacham. 


i74     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

would  first  learn  to  answer  the  '  absey  book,' l 
to  read  from  the  '  horn-book,1 2  and  write  from  the 
texts  in  the  copy-books 3  set  before  him.  After 
this,  Robert  Recorde's  Arithmetic*  persuasively 
called  The  Whetstone  of  the  Wit^  would  make 
him  a  man  of  figures,  while  Lilly's  Accidence  5  would 
initiate  him  into  the  mysteries  of  the  cases,  the 
numbers  and  genders.6  Later  on,  the  '  sententiae 
pueriles,'  beloved  of  Sir  Nathaniel,  would  teach 
him  the  grammar  of  Latin  :  after  which  j^Esop 
would  be  put  before  him,  with  his  '  currish 
riddles/7  then  Tully's  Orator?  Ovidius  Naso's 
flowers  of  fancy,9  and  the  medieval  poetry  of 
c  good  old  Mantuan.' 10 

After  these  had  refined  him  he  would  be  set 
grappling  with  the  verses  of  Horace,11  and  perhaps 
selections  from  Seneca  and  the  Latin  dramatists 12 
would  complete  his  discomfiture.  Such  would  be 
the  schoolboy's  course  ;  and  such  the  books  that 
filled  his  satchel,  weighed  on  his  soul  and  damped 
his  shining  morning  face.  Small  wonder  that 
the  unlettered  Elizabethan  viewed  such  courses 

1  King  John,  I.  i.  196. 

2  Love's  Labour  V  Lost,  v.  i.  49.  3  Ibid.,  v.  ii.  42. 

4  Cf.  a  paper  by  Spencer  Baynes,  *  What  Shakespeare  learnt  at 
School,'  based  on  educational  pamphlets  of  the  seventeenth  century. 

6  Cf.  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  iv.  i.  16.  6  Ibid.)  iv.  i.  70. 

7  3  Henry  VI.,  v.  v.  26.  8  Titus  Andronicus,  iv.  i.  14. 

9  Love's  Labour's  Lost,  iv.  ii.  120. 

10  Ibid.,  iv.  ii.  92.  u  Ibid.,  iv.  ii.  99. 
12  Hamlet,  u.  ii.  407. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     175 

askance,  or  that  the  erection  of  a  grammar-school 
to  such  was  nothing  short  of  a  '  traitorous  cor- 
ruption of  youth  ! ' 1 

Of  the  more  regal  seats  of  learning — the 
Universities — and  of  their  alumni^  much  can  be 
gathered  from  the  dramatists. 

The  Oxford  colleges  were  '  richly  seated  near 
the  river-side,'  the  town  *  gorgeous  with  high-built 
colleges '  : — 

'  And  scholars  seemly  in  their  grave  attire 
Learned  in  searching  principles  of  art.'2 

But  though  *  lordly  '  were  the  dwellings,  *  spacious 
the  rooms,  and  full  of  pleasant  walks,'  the 
doctors  were  but  '  meanly  learned,' 2  and  not  in 
keeping  with  such  a  fount  of  learning.  At 
Cambridge,  *  merry  (but  abusive)  comedies '  were 
frequently  acted  within  College  walls,  until  James  i. 
forbade  such  '  publick  shews '  within  five  miles  of 
the  University.  The  average  undergraduate  at 
the  end  of  his  career  would  be  able  to  say  that  he 
had  matriculated  in  the  University,  worn  out  six 
gowns  there,  seen  some  fools  and  some  scholars, 
that  he  had  gone  bareheaded  over  the  quadrangle, 
eaten  his  '  commons  with  a  good  stomach,'  and 
'  done  many  sleights  and  tricks  to  maintain  his 
wits  in  use.' 3  In  '  statu  pupillari '  he  would  have 

1  Cf.  z  Henry  71.,  iv.  vii.  33.     This  was  Jack  Cade's  comment 
on  the  educational  facilities.     It  is  an  indictment,  however,  of  no 
widespread  application. 

2  Greene,  Friar  Bacon  and  Friar  Bungay.         3  'The  Puritan,  I.  ii. 


1 76     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

been  subject  to  whipping,  but  as  a  graduate 
he  would  be  able  to  laugh  soundly  at  the  idea.1 
He  would  have  many  a  recollection  of  indis- 
position after  '  whiffing  tobacco  and  drinking 
healths,' 2  on  which  occasions  he  had  '  been  en- 
ticed out  to  take  the  air/  He  would  have 
swum  at  '  freshmans  heat,  at  paradise,  in  Barne- 
well  poole,  at  Chery  hinton,  Hogmagog  hills, 
and  at  Batts  ffolie/ 3  In  his  vacations  he  would 
have  been  often  pointed  to  as  a  member  of  the 
University,  for,  like  young  Easy,  he  would  have 
worn  University  manners  in  the  country  ;  and, 
in  wishing  c  Good-morning/  would  have  saluted 
with  '  Vim,  vitam,  spemque,  salutem  ! ' 

The  *  meere  scholler '  at  the  University  was  an 

*  animall  scabiosum/ 3  He  was  a  creature  that  could 

*  strike  fire  in  the  morning  at  his  tinder-box,  put  on 
a  paire  of  lined  slippers,  sit  rewming  until  dinner, 
and  then  goe  to  his  meate  when  the  Bell  rang/    He 
would  be  one  that  had  'a  peculiar  gift  in  a  cough 
and  a  licence  to  spit/    He  would  be  one  that  could 
not {  make  a  good  legge '  nor  '  eat  a  messe  of  broth 
cleanly/  one  that  could  not  *  ride  a  horse  without 
spur-galling/  nor  'salute  a  woman/ 3    He  would  be 
the  man  for  whom  the  College  provided,  just  as 
'  Fortune  provides  for  all  mortality's  ruins,  your  hos- 

1  Cf.  Middleton,  Chaste  Maid  in  Cheapside,  in.  ii. 

2  Day,  Peregrinatio  Scholastica  (Tractate  xx.). 

3  Return  from  Parnassus  (Part  II.),  n.  vi. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     177 

pital  for  your  lame-creeping  soldier,  your  open 
house  for  your  beggar,  and  your  widow  for  your 
gentleman/1 

He  would  ever  raise  his  hands  in  wonder  at 
those  'amorettoes'  who  spent  their  time  in 
1  combing  of  their  tangled  hair,'  and  would 
renounce  the  fairer  sex,  not  having  been  trained 
to  women's  company — a  want  in  University 
education,  allowed  by  contemporaries  to  be  c  the 
spoil  of  youth/  *  While  away  from  his  College 
he  would  be  pointed  to  as  '  piping  hot  from  the 
University/  for  'he  smells  of  buttered  loaves 
yet '  ;  he  would  be  allowed  to  be  perhaps  '  an 
excellent  scholar  but  the  arrantest  ass/ 2 

Of  war  and  of  c  hairbreadth  'scapes  i*  the  im- 
minent deadly  breach'  there  are  many  pictures 
in  the  dramatists  ;  but  they  are  generally  drawn 
with  a  free  hand,  and  the  details,  though  accu- 
rate, can  scarcely  always  be  described  as  strictly 
Elizabethan.  Their  armies  contained  ancients, 
corporals,  lieutenants,3  master-gunners,4  espials,* 
and  discoverers.6  Their  weapons  might  be  curtle- 
axes,7  brown  bills,8  or  steel-pikes.9  They  might 
use  brass  cannon,10  culverins,11  mortar-pieces,12  or 

1  Middleton,  Chaste  Maid  in  Cheapside,  1.  ii.,  in.  ii. 

2  Middleton,  Tour  Five  Gallants,  n.  i.       3  i  Henry  IP.,  iv.  ii.  26. 
4  i  Henry  VI.,  i.  iv.  6.  6  Ibid.,  iv.  iii.  6. 

6  2  Henry  17.,  iv.  i.  3.  r  As  You  Like  It,  \.  iii.  115. 

8  2  Henry  VI.,  I v.  x.  1 3.       9  Henry  V.,  i  v.  i.  40.     l°  Ibid.,  m.  i.  1 1 . 
11  i  Henry  W.,  n.  iii.  53.  ™  Henry  nil,  v.  iii.  45. 

M 


1 78     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

calivers,1  as  well  as  smoky  muskets,2  petars,3 
and  villainous  saltpetre.4  The  men-at-arms  would 
be  'lapped  in  proof'5  with  clibbard's  head  on 
knee/6  They  would  wear  scaly  gauntlets7  and 
cuisses,8  beavers9  and  bucklers,10  breastplates11 
and  burgonets,12  vantbraces13  and  riveted  armour.14 
To  the  sound  of  the  shrill  trump,  the  '  spirit- 
stirring  drum,  the  ear-piercing  fife/ 15  would 
they  follow  their  leader  and  chis  banners  sable, 
trimmed  with  rich  expense/16  It  was  long  after 
Elizabeth's  reign  that  a  radical  change  took  place 
in  the  accoutrement  of  English  armies,  notably 
in  the  days  of  Marlborough,  so  that  although 
some  of  the  martial  detail  mentioned  was  already 
obsolete,  yet  in  general  '  the  plumed  troops  and 
the  big  wars '  were  drawn  from  contemporary 
models.  The  kerns  and  gallowglasses,17  who  fought 
with  rebellious  Macdonald  against  Macbeth,  would 
call  up  to  an  Elizabethan  audience  those  troops 

1  i  Henry  IV.,  iv.  ii.  19. 

2  All's  Well  that  Ends  WeU,  in.  ii.  in. 

3  Hamlet^  in.  iv.  207.  4  i  Henry  IV.,  i.  iii.  60. 

5  Macbeth^  I.  ii.  54. 

6  Love's  Labour^s  Lost,  v.  ii.  54.5.  7  2  Henry  IV.,  i.  i.  146. 

8  i  Henry  IV.,  iv.  i.  105. 

9  2  Henry  IV.,  iv.  i.  120. 

10  Much  Ado  about  Nothing,  v.  ii.  17. 

11  Cf.  2  Henry  VI.,  in.  ii.  232.  12  Ibid.,  v.  i.  204. 
13  Troilus  and  Cressida,  I.  iii.  296.  14  Ibid.,  v.  vi.  29. 

15  Othello,  ill.  iii.  353.  16  Pericles,  v.  Prol.  19. 

17  Macbeth,  l.  ii.  13. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     179 

which  followed  the  wild  O'Neile  from  the  Western 
Isle  to  London,  and  caused  such  excitement  in  the 
metropolis. 

The  extensive  use  of  pressgangs  and  the  mal- 
versations of  press-money,1  which  prevailed  during 
the  latter  part  of  Elizabeth's  reign,  find  their 
replica  in  the  scenes  in  which  Falstaff,  on  royal 
service,  has  ragged  Thomas  Wart  pricked  down 
on  the  roll  together  with  Francis  Feeble,  Ralph 
Mouldy,  and  Simon  Shadow,2  whilst  he  sees  in 
his  mind's  eye  a  number  of  other  '  shadows  to 
fill  up  the  muster-book/ 3  In  an  ordinary  way, 
an  officer  thus  commissioned  would  press  good 
yeomen's  sons,  c  contracted  bachelors,  who  would 
as  lieve  hear  the  devil  as  a  drum.'  Such  would 
buy  themselves  off  from  service,  and  in  the  ranks 
would  be  left  none  but  *  discarded,  unjust  serving- 
men,'  c  younger  sons  to  younger  brothers,  re- 
volted tapsters,  and  ostlers  trade  -  fallen,  the 
cankers  of  a  calm  world  and  a  long  peace/  Doubt- 
less, too,  some  would  enlist  and  try  to  forget  their 
past  disgrace  when  they  were  drummed  out  of 
their  old  regiments  by  John  Drum's  entertain- 
ment.4 And  so  the  rabble  rout  would  come 

1  King  Lear,  iv.  vi.  87. 

2  Bogus  names  entered  on  the  list  by  the  recruiting  officer,  and  for 
which  pay  was  drawn  by  him. 

3  z  Henry  IV. ,  in.  ii.  135. 

*  Cf.  All's  Well  that  Ends  Well,  in.  vi.  38,  and  J.  Taylor,  Laugh 
and  be  Fat,  fol.  ii.  78. 


i8o     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

together,  and  as  they  marched,  would  '  find  linen 
enough  on  every  hedge.' 

The  professional  soldier  would  have  a  fitting 
notion  of  the  dignity  of  his  calling.  He 
would  be  '  full  of  strange  oaths,  .  .  .  jealous  in 
honour/  and  *  sudden  and  quick  in  quarrel.'  *  A 
gentleman  and  a  soldier  would  never  c  change 
words'  with  those  who  had  cnot  so  much  as  a 
good  phrase  in  their  bellies';2  barely  would  he 
touch  them  with  his  sword.  Among  his  equals, 
however,  he  would  ever  have  a  '  trick  or  two  to 
kill.'2  The  counterfeit  man  of  war  would  deny 
any  '  rare  and  un-in-one-breath-utterable  skill '  in 
the  stoccata  and  passada,  but  might  own  to  some 
rudiments  in  the  science,  announcing  the  same  in 
a  tone  of  haughty  significance.  His  dreams 
would  be  of  '  breaches,  ambuscades,  Spanish 
blades,  and  healths  five  fathom  deep.'  He  was  one 
who  would  rather  *  die  with  silence  than  live  with 
shame,' 3  but  on  occasion  could  talk  of  beleaguer- 
ings,  where  'resolute  gentlemen  as  any  were  in 
Europe'  were  struck  down  in  the  breach,  and 
how  he  had  escaped,  with  such  resolution  had  he 
advanced.  He  would  have  at  his  command  tales  of 
wars  in  '  Bohemia,  Hungary,  Dalmatia,  Poland,  and 
where  not ' ;  of  services  of  his  by  land  and  by  sea 

1  As  You  Like  It,  n.  vii.  1 50. 

2  Cf.  Ben  Jonsorf  s  '  Bobadil,'  Every  Man  in  His  Humour,  i.  i. 

3  Ben  Jonson,  Every  Man  in  His  Humour ,  i.  ii. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     181 

under  the  best  commanders  in  Christendom.  He 
would  narrate  how  he  was  '  twice  shot  at  the 
taking  of  Aleppo,  once  at  the  relief  of  Vienna ' : l 
how  he  had  been  ca  gentleman-slave  in  the 
gallies,'  and  had  escaped  badly  maimed,  with 
nothing  but  his  scars,  to  which  he  would  point 
as  c  the  noted  marks  of  his  resolution.' l  He  would 
also  be  a  mine  of  military  knowledge ;  and  in 
fighting  his  battles  over  again  he  would  instruct 
his  hearers  how  to  fortify  their  men  '  with  the 
quinque-angle  formation  in  champion  ground, 
because  the  corners  there  would  fall  flat/  Such 
would  be  the  military  figures  of  Elizabethan 
times  :  some,  impostors,  but  also  some  whom 
no  sea  could  deter  nor  enterprise  daunt. 

In  addition  to  the  professions  already  touched 
upon — the  more  regular  professions — there  were 
other  channels  into  which  the  energies  of  England's 
best  sons  were  directed,  and  in  which  many  of 
them  found  fame.  None  of  these  was  more  popular 
or  more  honourable  than  that  of  Adventurer,  em- 
bodying, as  it  did,  the  united  glory  of  soldier  and 
sailor,  and  often  the  profit  of  a  merchant.  Indeed, 
these  adventurers  were  oftentimes  but  merchants 
of  enterprise,  and  their  original  motive  is  still 
visible  in  the  title  of  '  Merchant  Adventurers.' 
Those  hardy  sailors  who  rounded  the  Horn  and 
burst  on  the  Pacific,  represented  a  class  of  rest- 

1  Ben  Jonson,  E<very  Man  in  His  Humour ',  I.  ii. 


1 82     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

less  spirits  to  whom  modern  England  owes  the 
foundation  of  her  colonial  wealth,  while  to  their 
age  they  gave  a  never-failing  supply  of  wonders. 
These  would  be  the  men  who  would  set  out 
as  merchants  c  venturing  madly  on  desperate 
marts ' : — 

'  Some,  to  the  wars,  to  try  their  fortunes  there, 
Some,  to  discover  islands  far  away.' l 

Before  venturing  forth  many  of  them  would, 
as  was  the  custom,  insure  their  safe  return.2 
Puntarvolo,  by  laying  out  ^5000,  would  receive 
five  times  as  much  on  his  return  from  the  Turk's 
Court  at  Constantinople.2  So  each  c  putter-out  of 
five  for  one '  would  start  with  a  light  heart,  and 
drift  his  ways,  whether  his  path  lay  through  the 
bottomless  bay  of  Portugal,3  the  roughness  of  the 
swelling  Adriatic,4  or  across  those  frozen  ridges 
of  the  Alps 5  to  drug-damned  Italy  6— *  the  Alps 
which  spat  and  voided  their  rheum  upon  those 
low-seated  vassals,  the  valleys/  Some  would 
brave  a  Poland  winter,7  or  go  and  dwell  with  <  the 
swag-bellied  Hollander '  ; 8  while  others  would 
seek  the  perfumes  of  Arabia,9  or  visit  the  land 

1  Two  Gentlemen  of  Verona,  i.iii.  10. 

2  Cf.  Tempest,  in.  iii.  48  ;  cf.  also  Every  Man  out  of  His  Humour. 

3  As  You  Like  It,  iv.  i.  206.  4  'Taming  of  the  Shrew,  i.  ii.  74. 
5  Richard  II.,  i.  i.  64.  6  Cymbeline,  in.  iv.  15. 

7  Comedy  of  Errors,  in.  ii.  xoo.     8  Othello,  11.  iii.  80. 
9  Macbeth,  v.  i.  57. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     183 

of  Prester  John.1  If  they  went  west,  they  went 
for  conquest  and  colonisation  ;  and  no  tale  was 
too  strange  if  only  it  had  crossed  the  high  seas. 
They  would  bring  home  as  trophies  Indians  and 
monsters.2  They  would  be  able  to  tell  of  un- 
inhabited islands  ;  '  strangely-named  deities  '  like 
Setebos ;  wonder-workers  like  Sycorax ;  races, 
savage  and  mysterious,  composed  of  men  '  whose 
heads  stood  in  their  breast.'  The  colonial  gold- 
fever  was  then  in  the  early  stages  of  its  develop- 
ment. '  Gold  is  more  plentiful  there/  an  en- 
thusiast would  say,  '  than  copper  is  with  us.  All 
their  dripping-pans  are  pure  gold  ;  all  the  chains 
with  which  they  chain  up  their  streets  are  massy 
gold ;  and  for  rubies  and  diamonds  they  go  forth 
on  holidays  and  gather  'em  by  the  seashore  to 
hang  on  their  children's  coats  and  stick  in  their 
children's  caps.' 3  Then  would  be  formed  small 
colonies,  like  that  of  Virginia,  which  was  peopled 
by  *  a  few  industrious  Scots,  who  indeed  are  dis- 
persed over  the  face  of  the  whole  earth.' 4  They 
would  give  people  at  home  an  opportunity  of  rais- 
ing questions  of  the  ethical  relation  to  be  observed 
between  the  invader  and  native,  and  would  leave 
the  same  authorities  to  deal  with  the  social  institu- 
tions and  government  of  such  communities.  The 
savage  might  say  to  them,  '  You  taught  me  lan- 

1  Much  Ado  about  Nothing,  n.  i.  262.  2  Tempest,  n.  ii.  34  ff. 

3  Eastward  Hoe.  *  Seagull's  description  of  Virginia. 


1 84     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

guage  ;  and  my  profit  on  't  is,  I  know  how  to 
curse/  But  such  problems  would  be  too  hard  for 
the  adventurer  himself.  The  men  at  home  would 
fashion  their  commonwealths  and  weave  their 
Utopias.  The  adventurers  would  be  England's 
official  pirates  as  far  as  Spanish  treasure-ships  were 
concerned  ;  but  to  meaner  and  unofficial  pirates 
the  law  would  show  no  mercy.  Such  offenders 
would  be  hung  on  the  shore  at  low-water  mark, 
and  lie  drowning  till  three  tides  had  washed  over 
them.1  Matters  of  foreign  travel  and  adventure, 
then,  were  household  topics  in  the  days  of  Eliza- 
beth, and  the  adventurers  themselves  were  most 
valuable  assets  of  the  country  which  had  pro- 
duced them.  Scarcely  professional  men,  and  yet 
not  tradesmen,  were  the  projectors,  the  usurers, 
and  newsvenders  of  the  day.  Then  as  now,  many 
were  the  lines  of  life  taken  in  the  hope  that 
they  would  point  the  royal  roads  to  fortune. 
Some,  like  Fitzdottrel,  would  long  to  become 
'  Duke  of  Drownlands ' 2  by  joining  in  a  scheme 
for  draining  the  marshes  of  England ;  others 
would  float  schemes  for  making  large  sums  by 
new  ways  of  '  dressing  dogskins/  or  of  c  bottling 
ale '  ;  while  others  would  undertake  to  find  a  way 
of  '  serving  the  whole  state  with  toothpicks/ 
The  usurers,  with  their  gold  chains  about  their 
necks,  would  drain  poor  men  with  their  system  of 

1  Tempest,  I.  i.  61.  2  Ben  Jonson,  Devil  is  an  Ass,  ii.  i. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     185 

commodities.  They  would  increase  their  profits 
by  making  loans,  partly  in  such  useless  com- 
modities as  c  brown  paper  and  old  ginger.'  For 
such  a  loan  was  Master  Rash  imprisoned  ;  *  and  it 
was  this  iniquitous  system  which  Bacon  proposed 
to  legislate  against  in  1623. 

It  is  Jonson  who  throws  light  on  the  wholesale 
knavery  which  existed  among  the  newsvenders 
of  the  time.2  News  was  gathered  from  four  main 
centres  in  London  :  the  Court,  Paul's,  the  Ex- 
change, and  Westminster  Hall.  There  would  be 
barbers'  news,  tailors'  news,  c  authentical  news,' 
and  apocryphal  news.  Wonderful  strange  news 
from  Amsterdam  and  Libtzig  would  be  much 
valued,  and  due  notice  would  be  given  of  such 
events  as  that  of  '  the  landing  of  a  colony  of 
cooks  on  the  coast  of  America  for  the  con- 
version of  cannibals  and  making  them  good  eating 
Christians.'  At  the  office  to  which  such  news 
gravitated  those  anxious  for  news  would  go,  like 
the  butterwoman  who  called  for  a  groat'sworth  of 
news  to  carry  to  her  vicar.  But  the  real  value 
of  such  information  was  well  known  by  the  better 
classes.  '  The  Currantoes,  or  Weekly  News,'  wrote 
a  contemporary,  *  are  all  conceites  ordinarily 
which  idle  brains  and  busy  fancies  invented.' 
'  And,'  he  also  added,  '  they  have  used  the  trade 
so  long  that  now  every  one  can  say  it  is  even 

1  Measure  for  Measure,  iv.  iii.  5.  2  See  his  Staple  of  News. 


1 86     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

as    true    as    a    currantoe,    meaning    that    it    is 
false/ 

More  lowly,  more  stable,  and  more  honest 
were  the  tradesmen  of  the  time.  We  hear  in 
Shakespeare  of  the  chandler  whose  wares  were 
dear ; *  of  the  cutler  whose  knives  were  with 
poetry  graven  ; 2  of  one  Sampson  Stockfish, 
fruiterer  ; 3  and  of  the  *  fleshmonger  working  in 
his  shirt/4  with  his  venom-mouthed  cur  at  his 
side,  ill-treated,  without  a  doubt,  and  often  sworn 
at :  for  *  butchers  and  tinkers  were  the  greatest 
fighters  and  most  profound  swearers'4  of  the  day. 
There  was  the  glover  with  his  paring-knife  ; 5 
Master  Three-pile,  the  mercer  ; 6  Master  Smooth, 
the  silkman  ; 7  the  pewterer,  with  the  rapid  motion 
of  his  hammer  ; 8  the  potter,  in  company  with  his 
wheel  ;  carpenters  with  leathern  aprons  ;  brokers 
with  their  pawns  and  treasures ;  colliers  who 
*  carry  coals  '  ; 9  and  '  dyers,  with  their  hands  sub- 
dued in  nature  to  what  they  worked  in  ' ; 10  and 
the  clock-setter,  who  puts  together  the  '  hundred 
pieces '  of  those  German  clocks,  '  still  a-repairing, 
ever  out  of  frame/  n  There  was  Tom  Snout,  the 

I  i  Henry  IV.,  in.  iii.  48.  2  Merchant  of  Venice,  v.  i.  149. 

3  2  Henry  IV.,  in.  ii.  32. 

4  Dekker,  The  Dead  Terme,  p.  13  5  2  Henry  VI.,  iv.  vii.  52. 

5  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  i.  iv.  21. 

6  Measure  for  Measure,  iv.  iii.  n.          7  2  Henry  IV.,  n.  i.  31. 

8  Ibid.,  in.  ii.  268.  9  Romeo  and  Juliet,  i.  i.  2. 

10  A  Mad  World  (Dodsley,  Old  English  Plays},  v.  p.  366. 

II  Lowers  Labour' 's  Lost,  in.  i.  192. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     187 

tinker  ;  Snug,  the  joiner  ; l  Francis  Flute/ bellows- 
mender.2  There  were  botchers8  and  haberdashers;4 
women's  tailors,5  and  perfumed  men's  milliners  ; 6 
early  carriers,7  whistling  carmen,8  singing  masons,9 
poor  mechanic  porters,10  black  chimney-sweeps,11 
hardy  washerwomen,12  rank  flax- wenches ; 13  sailors 
without  their  sea-gowns,14  posset  sellers,  orange- 
wives,  and  oyster-wenches.  The  'low-capped 
tradesman ' 15  would  ever  be  urging  the  *  flat- 
capped  '  ones  in  their  employ  to  shout  '  What  is  't 
ye  lack  ? '  in  a  louder  tone,  while  the  latter  would 
stand  with  '  bare  pates  and  dropping  noses/  under 
wooden  penthouses,  indulging  in  dreams  of  '  clubs 
and  bats/  or  interjecting  quotations  from  the 
popular  plays,  as  was  their  wont. 

The  most  frequented  of  such  shops,  at  least 
by  the  gallants,  would  be  the  tobacconist's  and 
the  barber's.  The  latter  would  have  chairs  that 
fitted  all  comers,16  and  perforated  censers  used  for 
fumigation.17  There  would  be  a  cithern,  or  some 

I  Midsummer  Nighfs  Dream,  i.  ii.  63.  2  Ibid.,  iv.  i.  206. 
3  Twelfth  Night,  i.  v.  44.                         4  Henry  VIIL,  v.  iii.  45. 

6  2  Henry  IV.,  in.  ii.  160.  6  i  Henry  IV.,  i.  iii.  36. 

7  Ibid.,  ii.  i.  36.  8  2  Henry  IV.,  in.  ii.  322. 
9  Henry  V.,  I.  ii.  198.                               10  Ibid.,  200. 

II  Love's  Labour  's  Lost,  iv.  iii.  262. 

12  Cf.  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  i.  ii.  5. 

13  Winter's  Tale,  i.  ii.  277.  14  Hamlet,  v.  ii.  13. 

15  Marston,  Eastward  Hoe,  i.  i.  i6zff. 

16  All's  Well  that  Ends  Well,  n.  ii.  17. 

17  Taming  of  the  Shrew,  iv.  iii.  91. 


1 88     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

other  instrument,  for  customers  to  play  on ;  and 
sometimes  a  list  of  forfeits 1  or  fines  would  hang  on 
one  of  the  walls,  to  be  imposed  for  bad  behaviour, 
naturally  with  the  intention  of  keeping  up  the 
standard  of  conduct  in  a  place  of  such  public  resort. 
A  tobacconist's  shop  would  be  primarily  an 
apothecary's.  If  the  owner  of  the  establishment 
were  popular  he  would  receive  pupils  whom  he 
would  initiate  into  the  mysteries  of  the  smoking 
art,  and  instruct  them  in  particular  as  to  the 
way  of  blowing  rings.  Such  a  man  would  be 
careful,  like  Drugger,  not  to  *  sophisticate '  his 
tobacco  with  c  sack-lees  or  oil ' ; 2  nor  would  he 
c  wash  it  in  muscadel  and  grains '  :  nor  '  bury  it 
underground  wrapped  up  in  greasy  leather.'  He 
would,  however,  keep  it  in  *  fine  lily  pots '  that, 
when  opened,  smelt  like  c  conserve  of  roses/  At 
such  a  fashionable  place  there  would  be  a  maple- 
block  and  silver  tongs,  Winchester  pipes  and  fire 
of  Juniper,  all  ready  for  the  passing  customer. 
And  doubtless  such  an  apothecary  would  have 
a  great  chance  of  obtaining  a  competency  and  of 
being  '  remembered  with  Lady  Ramsey  and  grave 
Gresham.' 3  This  would  be  an  ambition  of  thrifty 
business  men.  For  the  acts  of  such  would  '  be- 


1  Measure  for  Measure  y  v.  i.  320.    Cf.  Rules  for  Seemly  Behaviour, 
adduced  by  Dr.  Kenric,  but  rejected  by  some  critics  as  spurious. 

2  Ben  Jonson,  Alchemist,  i.  i. 

3  Chapman  and  Marston,  Eastward  Hoe. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     189 

come  posies  for  hospitals,'  their  *  names  would  be 
written  on  conduits/  and  their  deeds  played  in 
their  lifetime  by  the  best  companies  of  actors. 
Such  was  the  dream  of  many  an  Elizabethan 
tradesman  which  buoyed  him  up  in  his  hours  of 
business  strain  and  stress. 

Turning  now  to  the  Home-life  of  the  Eliza- 
bethans, their  house-appointments  and  style  of 
life,  we  can  obtain  from  the  dramatists  a  number 
of  details  which  shall  set  up  in  their  light  and 
shade  many  of  the  splendours  of  the  mansion  of 
the  time,  with  its  *  bay-windows  transparent  as 
barricadoes/ 1  its  quadrangles 2  and  turrets,3  its 
jutty,  frieze,  and  buttress,4  and  its  *  cloud-capped 
towers/ 5 

There  can  be  but  little  doubt  that  Shakespeare 
gained  admittance  now  and  again  to  some  of  those 
stately  palaces  which  Thorpe,  or  Adams,  or  Jansen, 
among  other  famous  architects,  erected  amid  the 
lovely  scenery  of  England.  For  in  such  places 
masques  or  entertainments  were  often  given  in 
honour  of  some  Tudor  Maecenas  by  my  Lord 
Chamberlain's  servants. 

In  his  plays  we  can  accompany  the  poet  past 
the  steward,  'in  the  chain  of  gold/6  past  the 
pages  and  foot-boys,7  kissing  their  hands  and 

1  Twelfth  Nightt  iv.  ii.  37.  2  z  Henry  VI.,  i.  Hi.  154. 

3  i  Henry  VI.,  I.  iv.  26.     4  Macbeth,  I.  vi.  6.      5  Tempest,  iv.  i.  152. 
6  Middleton,  A  Mad  World,  11.  i.  *  Henry  VIII.,  v.  ii.  25. 


1 90    SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

curtseying  with  their  left  legs  : *  on  into  the  house 
trimmed  by  the  serving-men l  in  their  blue  coats 
and  ribbons,  their  white  stockings  and  silver 
badges — Nicholas,  Philip,  Walter,  Sugarsop *  and 
the  rest.  We  can  partake  of  the  tempting 
Elizabethan  greeting  with  its  hospitable  kisses 
and  smiles,2  and  then  tread  '  the  senseless  rushes,' 3 
as  green  as  summer,4  strewed  on  the  floor,  as  we 
step  into  the  perfumed  chambers5  that  await  us. 
We  can  peer,  as  we  go,  through  the  curtains  at 
couches,  soft  and  sweet,  with  their  c  valance  of 
Venice  gold  in  needlework/6  and  their  downy 
pillows.7  We  can  gaze  in  wonder  at  the  coloured 
sunlight  streaming  through  the  coats  of  arms 
annealed  on  lofty  windows  ;  and  in  the  parlour 
we  can  hear  the  conference  by  the  fire,8  read  the 
chimney-posies,  study  the  painted  cloth  9  with  the 
mottoes  worked  on  it,  admire  the  '  China  dishes,' l 
or,  when  silence  comes,  listen  to  the  tender  music 
of  the  virginal. 

1  Taming  of  the  Shrew,  iv.  i.  87  ff. 

2  Cf.  Winter  s  Tale,  I.  ii.  3  Romeo  and  Juliet,  I.  iv.  36. 

4  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Valentinian,  p.  24. 

5  2  Henry  IV.,  in.  i.  12. 

6  Taming  of  the  Shrew,  n.  i.  346. 

7  Cymbeline,  in.  vi.  35.  8  Taming  of  the  Shrenv,  v.  ii.  103. 

9  Troilus  and  Cressida,  v.  x.  4.     Cf.  Perlin,  Description  d 'Angle- 
terre,  1552,  p.  ii  :    l  Des  toilles  pinctes,  qui  sont  bien  faictes  aux 
quelles  y  a  force  et  magnifiques  roses,  couronees  ou  il  y  a  fleurs  de 
Liz  et  Lions.' 

10  Measure  j or  Measure,  n.  i.  97. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     191 

There  are  galleries  we  may  wander  in,  galleries 
with  curtained  pictures ; l  or,  an  it  please  us, 
curious  -  knotted  gardens,2  circummured  with 
brick.3  In  the  state  sleeping-rooms  we  can  see 
old-fashioned  oak  bedsteads  of  enormous  size, 
richly  carved  and  hung  with  tapestry,  like  the 
Bed  of  Ware  which  has  lived  to  be  famous  ; 
while  in  smaller  rooms  are  '  standing  beds  ' 4  for 
those  of  rank,  truckle  beds  for  the  servants.  In 
an  outhouse  would  be  a  coach,  held  by  neigh- 
bouring rustics  to  be  a  crabshell  brought  out  of 
China.  In  the  garret  would  be  an  armourer 
scouring  coats  of  steel ; 5  in  the  pantry  a  bread- 
chipper  ; 6  in  the  kitchen  the  sewers  who  tasted  the 
dishes ;  and  cooks  as  well,  who  killed  c  fowls  of 
season,' 7  and  roasted  them  with  the  aid  of  their 
'  turnspit  dog  bound  to  the  wheel.1 8  All  would 
be  ranked  among  the  retainers  and  would  be 
subject  to  those  instructions  and  lessons  of 
morality  which  the  mistress  of  the  house  hung  up 
below-stairs  for  the  benefit  of  her  servants. 

One  of  the  most  important  demesnes  that 
Shakespeare  might  have  seen  was  that  of  None- 
such in  Surrey.  If  he  ever  paid  a  visit  to  this 
particular  mansion,  there  he  would  have  revelled 

1  Twelfth  Night,  i.  v.  232.  2  Loves  Labour's  Lost,  I.  i.  244. 

3  Measure  for  Measure,  iv.  i.  28. 

4  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  iv.  v.  7.          6  2  Henry  VL,  i.  iii.  191. 
6  2  Henry  IV.,  n.  iv.  242.  7  Measure  for  Measure y  n.  ii.  84. 
8  Marston,  Eastward  Hoe,  n.  iii.  282. 


1 92     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

in  '  hangings  all  of  Tyrian  tapestry,' x  in  '  Turkey 
cushions  bossed  with  pearl,' z  in  plate  of  rare 
device,3  in  figured  goblets 4  and  in  jewels  of  rich 
and  exquisite  form.5  There  he  would  have  found 
quaint  court-cupboards,6  ivory  coffers,  cypress 
chests,  arras  and  counterpoints.7  And  there,  while 
'  brave  attendants '  waited  on  the  guests  with 
*  diapers  of  fine  linen/  the  latter  would  cool 
their  hands  with  silver  basins  '  full  of  rose-water 
and  bestrewed  with  flowers.'8  There  on  the 
terrace,  planted  around  with  orange-trees  and 
laurels,  might  he  have  listened  sadly  to  strains  ot 
music  floating  outwards  from  the  hall,  and  have 
dreamt  of  *  such  a  night '  as  that  on  which 
Lorenzo  distilled  his  love  to  willing  Jessica.9 

But  what  makes  it  more  than  likely  that  Shake- 
speare actually  viewed  these  royal  halls  of  None- 
such is  the  fact  that  he  mirrors  in  enthusiastic 
poetry  several  of  the  artistic  masterpieces  of 
classical  myth,  which  stood  within  the  palace  or 
its  grounds. 

When  lachimo  leads  the  way  to  the  bed- 
chamber of  Imogen,  and  describes  the  cutter's 
delicate  work — '  Chaste  Dian  bathing ' 10 — he  de- 

1  Taming  of  the  Shrew,  n.  i.  342.  2  Ibid.,  n.  i.  346. 

3  Cymbeline,  i.  vii.  189.  4  Richard  II.,  in.  iii.  150. 

5  Cymbeline,  I.  vii.  190.  6  Romeo  and  Juliet,  i.  v.  8. 
*  Taming  of  the  Shrew,  II.  i.  344. 

8  Ibid.,  Induction,  i.  56. 

9  Cf.  Merchant  of  Venice,  v.  i.  69.  10  Cymbeline,  n.  iv.  82. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     193 

picts  the  very  carving  of  the  goddess  which 
adorned  a  grove  in  Nonesuch  Park.  When  the 
poet  describes  Sir  Actaeon,  with  the  hounds, 
*  driving  upon  his  new  -  transformed  limbs/ l 
might  it  not  have  been  suggested  by  the  repre- 
sentation of  Dian's  ill-fated  lover  which  stood,  too, 
within  the  same  princely  grounds  ?  Perhaps  we 
might  even  conjecture  that  the  tapestry  displaying 
proud  Cleopatra  when  she  met  her  Roman  ; 2  the 
andirons  moulded  as  'two  winking  Cupids  of 
silver';2  the  golden  cherubs  fretted  on  the  ceiling 
of  Imogen's  room,2  and  all  the  *  wanton  pictures ' 
of  Daphne  roaming  through  the  thorny  wood,  or 

*  Adonis,  painted  by  a  running  brook  ; 
And  Cytherea  all  in  sedges  hid/  3 

pictures  which  poor  Christopher  Sly  awoke  to 
find  his  own, — that  all  these  paintings  and  designs 
were  reminiscences  of  sculptures  and  paintings  at 
Nonesuch.4 

It  seems  probable,  too,  that  it  was  in  the 
palaces  of  the  new  nobility,  whither  so  many 
treasures  of  Italian  and  Dutch  art  found  their 
way,  that  Shakespeare  became  acquainted  with 
the  gems  of  foreign  workmanship  which  he  so 
delicately  introduces  into  his  writings.  For  this 

1  Titus  Andronicus,  11.  iii.  64  j  cf.  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  II.  i.  1 1 8. 
a  Cymbeline,  n.  iv.  70  and  90.    3  Taming  of  the  Shrew,  Induction,  ii. 
4  Cf.  article  in  Gentleman  s  Magazine  for  1837,  quoting  Houf- 
nagle  and  Hentzner. 

N 


i94     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

is  far  more  probable  than  to  assume  that  they 
were  suggested  to  him  by  continental  travel.  lo, 
beguiled  and  surprised,1  was  a  subject  that  appealed 
to  many  artists  of  the  Renascence  ;  and  it  is  only 
natural  that  the  great  dramatist  should  have 
included  the  picture  of  Jupiter's  wandering  love 
amongst  those  scenes  which,  with  music  making 
'  a  dulcet  and  heavenly  sound/ 2  were  set  to  trick 
the  Protean  tinker.  It  is  true  that  the  lo  of 
Coreggio  was  then  on  view  at  Milan  and  was  the 
admiration  of  travellers.  But,  on  the  other  hand, 
a  picture  of  lo  and  Jupiter  graced  the  gallery  of 
the  Duke  of  Buckingham  at  this  very  time — a 
picture  attributed  to  Holbein  on  Horace  Wai- 
pole's  authority.8  So  that  Shakespeare  was  pro- 
bably indebted  to  a  native  source  for  his  picture 
of  lo.  Neither  is  it  remarkable  that  in  the 
Winter  s  Tale,  Shakespeare  represents  *  that  rare 
Italian  master,  Julio  Romano/ 4  as  executing  the 
statue  of  Hermione.  Romano  was  that  pupil  of 
Raphael  who  most  strikingly  blended  the  idealism 
of  his  master  with  the  realistic  strength  of  Michael 
Angelo.  His  style  appealed  intimately  to  the 
British  mind,  and  although  he  was  better  known 
as  a  painter  than  a  sculptor,  the  poet  selects  him 
solely  on  account  of  the  artistic  power  ascribed 

1  'Taming  of  the  Shrew,  Induction,  ii.  54.  2  Ibid.,  i.  54. 

3  Walpole,  Anecdotes  of  Painting,  vol.  i.  p.  148. 

4  Winter's  Tale,  v.  ii.  96. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     195 

to  him  in  the  play — the  power  of  putting  breath 
into  his  work  and  tricking  Nature  of  her  custom. 
Moreover,  in  order  to  make  more  expressive  the 
scene  where  Hermione  comes  back  into  the 
world  as  a  breathing  statue,  the  supposed  figure 
had  to  be  clothed  and  painted  in  life-like  colours. 
And  this  combination  of  the  brush  and  chisel 
would  have  appeared  not  impossible  to  any  Eliza- 
bethan who  was  acquainted  with  the  city  statues, 
*  painted,'  as  Ben  Jonson  said,  '  in  most  orient 
colours.' l 

Of  the  vast  profusion  in  Elizabethan  feasts 
and  meals,  essentially  in  keeping  with  the  magnifi- 
cence of  portly  mansions,  there  is  but  small 
evidence  in  Shakespeare.  His  references  to  the 
customs  of  the  table  are  but  few  and  scattered. 

The  churlish  philosopher  in  Timon  of  Athens 
gives  an  example  of  the  manner  in  which  grace  was 
often  said  *  in  metre ' ; 2  and  Gratiano's  scoffing 
wit  has  a  word  of  mockery  for  those  *  well- 
studied  in  a  sad  ostent,'3  those  who  were  wont 
to  hood  their  eyes  with  their  hat  at  the  '  thanks- 
giving before  meat.'4  Breakfast5  and  dinner,6 

1  Ben  Jonson,  Magnetic  Lady,  v.  iv. 

2  Cf.  also  Measure  for  Measure,  I.  ii.  22. 

3  Merchant  of  Venice,  n.  iii.  190.     From  this  it  appears  that  hats 
were  worn  at  meals  and  only  removed  when  grace  was  said. 

4  Measure  for  Measure,  I.  ii.  16. 

5  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  in.  iii.  246. 

6  Much  Ado  about  Nothing,  n.  iii.  212. 


196     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

supper1  and  after-supper2  are  all  incidentally 
mentioned.  Occasionally  the  carpet  3  is  laid  for 
a  convivial  feast,  for  a  wedding  dinner,4  after 
which  the  bride's  elder  sisters,  still  unmarried, 
'  danced  barefoot ; 5  or  for  a  sad  burial  feast,6 
with  its  *  funeral  baked  meats.' 7  At  most  great 
tables  the  company  was  usually  arranged  in  fours. 
Biron  said,  not  without  significance,  that  his  three 
companions  lacked  him  as  a  fourth  *  to  complete 
the  mess.' 8  At  times  a  banquet  would  he  made 
c  ready  in  the  privy  chamber,'  9  or  again,  sporting 
gallants  might  hastily  partake  of  that  collation 
known  as  the  '  running  banquet.' 

After  dinner  or  supper,  the  domestic  fool — that 
chartered  jester — would  appear.  He  would  be 
distinguished  by  his  calf-skin  coat,  buttoned  down 
the  back ;  or  else  he  might  wear  '  a  garded  coat," 
with  *  a  great  dagger.' l  His  head  would  be 
closely  shaven.  He  would  jest  in  season  and 
out  of  season,  but  only  a  capricious  master  would 
have  him  'whipped  for  taxation.'1  His  privi- 
leges, as  a  rule,  were  very  great,  as  also  was  the 
affection  he  would  win  from  those  of  the  house- 
hold, not  only  by  his  good-humoured  fun,  but 

1  Merchant  of  Venice,  n.  ii.  122. 

2  Midsummer  Nighfs  Dream,  v.  i.  34. 

3  Teaming  of  the  Shrew,  iv.  i.  52.  4  Ibid.,  in.  ii.  218. 
5  Ibid.,  n.  i.  33.                                6  Romeo  and  Juliet,  iv.  v.  87. 
7  Hamlet,  i.  ii.  179.               8  Lovis  Labours  Lost,  iv.  iii.  204. 
9  Henry  nil.,  i.  iv.  98.           l°  Fletcher,  Noble  Gentleman,  v.  i. 
"  As  You  Like  It,  i.  ii.  81. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     197 

also  by  the  pathos  which  continually  enfolded 
him.  In  Holbein's  picture  of  Sir  Thomas 
More's  family  this  fact  would  appear,  for 
Patison,  the  Fool,  is  the  only  servant  repre- 
sented in  the  picture  ;  and  the  endearment  with 
which  he  was  regarded  by  the  family  becomes 
evident.  The  entertainment  of  the  Fool,  how- 
ever, was,  in  Shakespeare's  time,  already  dying 
out.  It  was  not  easy  to  find  men  capable  of 
playing  the  part.  And  since  the  little  wit  that 
fools  had  was  grown  silent,  '  the  little  folly  that 
wise  men '  had,  made  '  the  greater  show.' *  At 
public  entertainments  the  city  fool  would  still 
be  retained.  But  the  humour  expected  of  him 
would  be  of  a  grosser  kind  than  would  please  the 
great  houses.  He  would  have  to  jump  into  a 
large,  deep  custard,  and  so  *  set  on  a  quantity  of 
barren  spectators  to  laugh.'  In  earlier  times  the 
Fools  had  tickled  the  laughter  delicately,  as  the 
wine  warmed  the  heart.  They  '  that  had  good 
wits,  had  much  to  answer  for ' ;  like  Touchstone, 
they  would  be  flouting ;  they  could  not  hold.2 

Shakespeare  does  not  dwell  on  the  material 
side  of  things  when  he  depicts  the  home-life  of 
his  contemporaries.  Details  which  a  Petronius 
would  have  revelled  in  setting  out,  find  but  small 
description  in  his  pages.  The  few  details  which 
he  gives  seem  to  be  given  mainly  for  a  comic 
effect,  and  are  connected  chiefly  with  those  whose 

1  As  You  Like  //,  I.  ii.  84.  Ibid.,  v.  i.  16. 


198     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

humour  moved  along  homely  grooves,  like  Sir 
Andrew  Aguecheek,  who  put  down  his  damaged 
wit  to  his  beef-eating  propensity.  Such  good 
honest  souls,  redolent  with  c  brown  bread  and 
garlic/ l  might  occasionally  season  their  sallies 
with  allusions  to  those  necessaries  of  life  in 
which  their  dura  ilia  delighted.  It  is  therefore  in 
connection  with  them  that  we  hear  of  Tewkes- 
bury  mustard 2  and  soft  Banbury  cheese,3  of 
pippins 4  and  neat's  foot,5  of  neat's  tongue  dried,6 
and  stuffed  rabbit,7  of  an  old  hoar  hare8  for  a 
Lenten  pie,9  of  capons  burned,  and  pigs  fallen 
from  the  spit,10  of  soused  gurnet n  and  stock 
fishes,12  old  apple  John  and  shotten  herrings,13 
and  humble  warden  pies  coloured  with  saffron.14 
With  those  who  ate  such  dainties  no  'kissing 
comfits '  u  were  needed  to  sweeten  the  breath. 

No  stress,  however,  is  laid  by  Shakespeare  on 
those  chines  of  beef15  which  loaded  the  dresser  in 
the  manorial  hall,  bustling  with  trencher-knight, 
and  server.16  He  does  not  linger  much  with  carved 

1  Measure  for  Measure,  in.  ii.  185.  z  2  Henry  W.,  ii.  iv.  244. 

3  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  i.  i.  130.  4  Ibid.9  i.  ii.  13. 

5  Taming  of  the  Shrevj,  iv.  iii.  17.  6  i  Henry  IP.,  n.  iv.  255. 
1  Taming  of  the  Shrevu,  iv.  iv.  101. 

8  Romeo  and  "Juliet,  ii.  iv.  135.  9  Ibid.,  136. 

10  Comedy  of  Errors,  i.  ii.  44.  u  i  Henry  W.,  iv.  ii.  n. 

12  Measure  for  Measure,  in.  ii.  m. 

13  i  Henry  W.,  ill.  iii.  5 ;  ibid.,  ii.  iv.  134. 

14  Winter's  Tale,  iv.  ii.  48  ;  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  v.  v.  22. 

16  Henry  V.,\\\.  vii.  164.  1G  Love's  Labour's  Lost,  v.  ii.  464. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     199 

pasties,1  flavoured  with  dates  and  quinces  ; 2  nor 
with  those  delectable  junkets,3  rising  in  crenel- 
lated turrets  from  the  well-laden  table  ;  nor  again 
with  those  more  delicate  viands  which  were 
*  caviare  to  the  general/4  We  can  only  catch  a 
passing  glimpse  of  the  immutable  distinction  so 
emphatically  proclaimed  by  other  Elizabethan 
writers  between  the  *  salt-butter  rogue  ' 5  to  whom 
c  conserves  of  beef'6  were  as  luscious  as  locusts, 
and  the  well-derived  gentleman,  on  the  other 
hand,  who  would  relish  a  hot  venison  pasty,7  and 
would  taste  in  his  arbour  after  supper,  and  before 
his  posset,8  a  last  year's  pippin,  with  a  dish  of 
caraways.9 

Jonson,  however,  could  work  up  more  en- 
thusiasm over  the  culinary  art,  and  he  describes 
in  detail  how  a  good  cook  would  be  a  professor, 
an  engineer,  and  a  mathematician  all  in  one.  For 
the  tables  of  the  great  he  would  design  and  draw, 
paint  and  carve,  and  build  citadels  of  curious 
fowl  and  fish.  Sometimes  he  would  dig  ditches 
and  arrange  moats  of  broth  ;  or  again  cut  fifty- 
angled  custards,  rear  bulwark  pies,  and  for 

1  Taming  of  the  Shrew,  iv.  iii.  89. 

2  Romeo  and  Juliet ,  iv.  iv.  2. 

3  Taming  of  the  Shrew,  in.  ii.  247.  4  Hamlet,  n.  ii.  457. 

5  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  n.  ii.  274. 

6  Taming  of  the  Shrew,  Induction,  ii.  7. 

7  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  i.  i.  191.  8  Ibid.,  v.  v.  180. 
9  2  Henry  W.,  v.  iii.  3. 


200     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

his  outer  works  raise  ramparts  of  immortal 
crusts. 

From  other  contemporaries,  too,  we  can  gather 
something  more  about  the  various  tables  kept, 
and  the  methods  of  serving.  At  the  table  of  a 
mean  Country  Justice,  besides  the  '  cheap  salads, 
sliced  beef,  giblets,  and  <c  pettitoes," '  sometimes 
at  the  lower  end  there  would  be  great,  cumber- 
some, uncut-up  pies,  filled  with  moss  and  stones, 
partly  to  make  a  show  with,  and  partly  <  to  keep 
the  lower  mess  from  eating.'  The  gentlemen  at 
the  table  would  carouse  in  wine  with  which  many 
would  take  sugar  ;  the  clowns  would  '  use  large 
drinking  of  beere  or  ale.' l 

Things  would  be  served  up  differently  in 
different  places.  At  city  feasts  the  meat  would 
*  come  sneaking  in,  one  dish  a  quarter  of  an  hour 
after  another/ *  at  hunting-breakfasts,  all  the  dishes 
at  once 1 ;  while  with  the  old-fashioned,  the  courses 
would  be  brought  in  by  '  a  score  of  bleer-eyed 
serving-men  in  long  blue  coats,' l  bringing  old 
memories  in  their  train.  But  at  public  and 
private  feasts  alike,  drinking  excesses  were  the 
rule.  According  to  a  contemporary,  'In  some 
gentlemen's  houses,  with  some  captains  and 
soldiers,  with  also  the  vulgar  sort  of  citizens  and 
artisans,  large  and  intemperate  drinking  is  used.' 2 

1  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Woman  Hater,  I.  ii. 

2  Moryson,  Itinerary,  p.  3. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     201 

But  he  also  adds  that  '  the  greater  and  better  part 
of  the  English  hold  all  excess  blameworthy,  and 
drunkenness  a  reproachful  vice/  However  true 
this  may  be,  the  keeping  of  the  wassail  was  a 
custom  firmly  fixed  in  Shakespeare's  time,  al- 
though it  may  have  been  one  *  more  honoured 
in  the  breach  than  in  the  observance.'  The 
English  of  his  time  were  '  stubborn  drinkers.' 
<  Than  an  Englishman,'  said  another  playwright, 
*  not  a  leak  at  sea  can  suck  more  liquor.  You 
shall  have  their  children  christened  in  mulled 
sack,  and  at  five  years  old,  able  to  knock  a  Dane 
down.' * 

The  description  of  the  Christmas  festivities  of 
1604-5  by  a  contemporary  also  will  probably  in 
this  connection  be  recalled.  How,  at  the  revels, 
Hope,  Faith,  and  Charity  appeared  in  rich  dresses 
before  the  King,  and  *  Hope  did  essay  to  speak, 
but  wine  rendered  her  endeavour  so  feeble  that 
she  withdrew,  and  hoped  the  King  would  excuse 
her  brevity.  Faith  was  then  all  alone,  for  I  am 
certain  she  was  not  joined  with  good  works,  and 
left  the  Court  in  a  staggering  condition.  Charity 
then  came  to  the  King's  feet,  and  seemed  to 
cover  the  multitude  of  sins  her  sisters  had  com- 
mitted. ...  I  ne'er  did  see  such  lack  of  good 
order,  discretion,  and  sobriety.'  The  stigma 
which  rested  on  the  country  was  certainly  not 

1  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Captain,  in.  ii. 


202     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

without  foundation,  and  drinking  bouts  must  have 
made  many  a  manor  resound  with  cries,  which,  to 
its  dishonour,  had  been  caught  from  the  Court. 

A  more  interesting  side  of  Elizabethan  life, 
however,  is  that  of  its  public  amusements.  Some 
of  these  have  already  been  mentioned,  either  in 
connection  with  the  country  or  else  with  the 
metropolis.  The  greatest  and  most  general  of 
such  amusements  has  yet  to  be  touched  upon,  for 
it  was  in  their  theatres  that  the  English  people  found 
their  most  lasting  pleasure.  It  was  the  theatre 
that  nourished  their  complex  natures,  fed  their 
enthusiasms,  and  stirred  their  feelings. 

There  is  in  Shakespeare's  dramas  much  that 
had  characterised  the  English  stage  when  but  in 
embryo  ;  and  in  addition  to  such  survivals  of 
the  past,  they  also  contain  flashes  caught  from 
the  pageantry  of  the  time. 

The  poet's  first  acquaintance  with  the  stage 
must  have  been  made  when  companies  of  strolling 
players  came  to  Stratford,  or  when  he  met  them 
trudging  with  their  carts  along  country  roads 
towards  Kenilworth  or  Warwick.  Perhaps  the 
moralities  represented  on  so  many  a  village 
scaffold  were  among  the  first  forms  in  which  he 
saw  any  histrionic  representation  at  all.  In  any 
case,  much  that  characterised  this  old  crude  act- 
ing finds  an  echo  in  his  plays,  and  also  in  some  of 
his  contemporaries. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     203 

The  '  formal  vice  ' l  of  Shakespeare's  youth, 

'  Who  with  dagger  of  lath, 
In  his  rage  and  his  wrath, 

Cried  "Ah,  ha!"  to  the  devil,'2 

stepped  into  the  Elizabethan  drama  as  the  clown  ; 
and  in  this  way  the  memory  of  the  '  grey  Iniquity ' J 
of  the  moral  plays  was  successfully  kept  green. 
The  grave-diggers  in  Ham/et,  too,  are  surely 
remembrances  of  the  Antic  who  sat  in  the 
c  motion '  by  the  puppet  Vanity,4  c  scoffing  his 
state  and  grinning  at  his  pomp.' 5 

The  pageants  of  the  Trade  Guilds  (into  whose 
hands  the  drama  came  after  the  old  miracle  plays, 
and  who  exhibited  regularly  at  London,  Coventry, 
York,  and  Chester)  are  also  represented  in 
Shakespeare's  works,  when  he  carefully  distin- 
guishes Quince  as  a  carpenter ;  Smug  as  a  joiner  ; 
Bottom,  a  weaver  ;  Snout,  a  tinker  ;  and  Starve- 
ling, a  tailor.  This  characteristic  of  his  Mid- 
summer Nighfs  Dream  is  obviously  a  laughing 
recollection  of  those  old  guild  players,  *  hard- 
handed  men,'  who  had  *  never  laboured  in  their 
minds '  till  then.  For  in  those  earlier  days  the 
audience  would  behold  their  friends,  the  baker, 
the  tanner,  the  carpenter,  and  the  cook,  all  on  the 

1  Richard  III.,  in.  i.  82.  2  Twelfth  Night,  iv.  ii.  129  ff. 

3  i  Henry  IV.,  n.  iv.  500.  4  King  Lear,  11.  ii.  36. 

5  Richard  II.,  in.  ii.  162. 


204     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

scaffolding,  impersonating  patriarchs,  devils,  or 
angels  to  the  best  of  their  ability. 

When  the  player  recites  *  Eneas'  tale  to  Dido  * 
before  the  Danish  prince,  he  is  unconsciously 
burlesquing  the  windy  bombast  of  the  popular 
stage  when  a  sword  would  be  called  c  a  blade,  a 
bloody,  blameful  blade,' 1  while  rebels  might  have 
the  style  of  '  vaporous  villeins  with  venim  vul- 
nerate,'  or  '  prating  parenticides,  plexious  to 
pinnositee.'  The  '  Pyramus  and  Thisbe '  story, 
as  handled  by  the  Athenian  artisans  in  A  Mid- 
summer Night's  Dream,  seems,  moreover,  to  be 
a  skit  on  the  classical  dramas  of  the  day,  charac- 
terised as  they  were  by  an  absence  of  dignity 
and  an  extravagance  of  style,  with  the  jingling 
doggerel  of  their  prologues  in  '  eight  and  six/  and 
with  their  far-fetched  fancies  embedded  in  gro- 
tesque invocations.  There  are,  in  fact,  in  Shake- 
speare alone,  many  fossil  remains  of  the  earlier 
stage ;  and  his  plays  afford  not  a  few  hints  of  the 
various  phases  the  drama  had  gone  through 
within  his  memory,  as  it  sped  on  its  way  from 
Chester's  Morality  to  the  Hamlet  of  the  Globe. 

But  the  same  cause  which  prompted  him  to 
trace  occasionally  those  primitive  shows  which 
had  delighted  town  and  country,  also  induced 
him  to  look  upon  the  stage  at  large  as  a  fruitful 
tree  from  which  to  pluck  metaphors  and  similes. 

1  A  poem  of  1537. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     205 

He  would  draw  on  the  popular  sports  freely  for 
such  things,  but  the  drama  was  even  nearer  to  the 
people,  and  his  debt  to  the  latter  is  consequently 
still  greater.  Thus  he  forcibly  likens  the  orator 
courting  his  audience's  favour,  to  the  player  whom 
the  c  tag-rag  ' 1  people  alternately  clap  and  hiss  ; 
the  exiled  statesman  to  the  dull  actor  who  has 
forgotten  his  part ; 2  and  the  derided  king  to  the 
tedious  prattler  who  tries  to  entertain  '  after  the 
well-graced  actor  leaves  the  stage.' 3  In  his  eyes 
the  scheming  politician  is  but  one  who  does 

*  Counterfeit  the  deep  tragedian, 
Speak,  and  look  back,  and  pry  on  every  side, 
Tremble  and  start  at  wagging  of  a  straw, 
Intending  deep  suspicion.'4 

Life  is  '  but  a  poor  player  that  struts  and  frets  his 
hour  upon  the  stage  and  then  is  heard  no  more,' 5 
while  the  world  is  a  *  great  stage  of  fools,' 6  a 
theatre  *  to  feed  contention  in  a  lingering  act.' 7 

The  fact  that  such  metaphors  were  among  the 
most  pregnant  employed  by  the  dramatist,  would 
suffice  to  show  how  close  the  stage  lay  to  the  heart 
of  the  people,  even  if  the  persistent  inveighings 
against  the  flocking  to  the  theatres,8  against  '  pre- 

1  Julius  Casar,  I.  ii.  260.  2  Coriolanus,  v.  iii.  40. 

3  Richard  II.,  v.  ii.  24.  4  Richard  ///.,  in.  v.  6. 

5  Macbeth,  v.  v.  25.  6  King  Lear,  iv.  vi.  182. 

7  2  Henry  17.,  i.  i.  156. 

8  Stubbes,  Anatomic  of  Abuses  (1583),  p.  90. 


206     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

sentments  clothed  in  vocal  sound/  1  had  not  led 
to  the  same  conclusion.  The  glow  of  the  play- 
house reached  out  far  and  lit  up  all  classes,  from 
the  courtier  at  Greenwich,  who  would  gracefully 
listen  to  c  an  excellent  conceited  comedie,'  to  the 
bargee  on  the  Thames,  who  accompanied  the  splash 
of  his  oars  with  monologues  of  Tamburlaine. 

Concerning  the  actor  and  his  bearing,  the  stage 
and  its  surroundings,  much  can  also  be  gathered 
from  the  Shakespearean  drama  ;  for  the  Roscian 
art  as  he  knew  it,  found  in  him  a  keen  critic. 

There  were  several  points  in  connection  with 
the  actor's  conception  of  his  art  which  Shakespeare 
could  not  approve  of.  The  extemporisation 
already  mentioned,  so  frequent  on  the  Elizabethan 
stage,  was  in  the  first  place  greatly  to  be  deplored. 
And  when  Shakespeare  exclaims  that  the  clowns 
ought  '  to  speak  no  more  than  is  set  down  for 
them/  2  he  is  inveighing  against  an  evil  which  was 
wont  to  corrode  much  of  the  finest  metal  in  the 
dramatic  output.  The  clown's  commonplace 
would  inevitably  have  a  false  jarring  note  in  a 
play  of  poetic  tendency. 

Then  some  clowns  would  laugh,  to  spread  the 
contagion,  neglecting  for  a  time  the  course  of  the 
play.  This  slight  could  not  but  earn  the  resent- 
ment of  the  greatest  of  dramatists.  It  showed, 
moreover,  '  a  most  pitiful  ambition  in  the  fool ' 

1  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Prophetess,  iv.  i.     2  Hamlet,  in.  ii.  41. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     207 

who  used  it,  the  grossest  ignorance  of  the  end 
of  comedy. 

There  also  were  ranting,  '  robustious,  periwig- 
pated  fellows/  who  would  mouth  their  speeches 
and  c  tear  a  passion  to  tatters/ l  Such  actors  would 
be  the  offspring  of  the  bearded  Herods  of  the 
old  mystery  plays,  the  speech  of  which  crude 
figures  had  been  like  '  a  chime  a- mending/ 2  They 
had  been  wont  to  strut  across  the  scene,  to 

'  Think  it  rich 

To  hear  the  wooden  dialogue  and  sound 
'Twixt  their  stretch'd  footing  and  the  scaffbldage.' 2 

But  the  best  actors  of  Shakespeare's  day  would 
avoid  this  out-heroding  of  Herod  and  'speak 
their  speeches  trippingly  on  the  tongue/  Those 
who  would  strut  and  bellow  had  '  neither  the 
accent  of  Christians,  nor  the  gait  of  Christian, 
pagan,  nor  man/ 

It  must,  however,  be  remembered  that  this 
'  o'erdoing  Termagant ' 3  was  also  to  some  extent 
the  result  of  existing  conditions  on  the  English 
stage.  It  was  1660  before  a  woman  appeared  in  any 
rote,  and  it  is  hard  to  see  how  the  contrast  between 
the  strength  of  an  Othello  and  the  clinging  tender- 
ness of  a  Desdemona  could  possibly  be  exhibited,  if 
the  same  quality  of  masculine  notes  gave  utterance 

1  Hamlet,  in.  ii.  9.  2  Troilus  and  Cressida,  I.  iii.  155  ff. 

3  Hamlet,  in.  ii.  15. 


208     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

to  the  bride's  tearful  love-words  and  to  the  virile 
wrath  of  the  Moor.  This  absence  of  woman 
from  womanly  parts  was  undoubtedly  another 
grave  disability  under  which  Shakespeare's  stage 
laboured,  and  one  which  seriously  crippled  the 
actor's  possibilities.  It  not  only  helped  to  keep 
up  the  ranting  traditions,  but  it  added  to  the 
discord  which,  from  other  causes,  was  associated 
with  the  stage.  The  extent  of  the  evil  can  be 
gathered  from  a  statement  of  the  Restoration 
days,1  lamenting  the  fact  that  girls  of  fifteen  were 
represented  on  the  stage  by  men  of  fifty,  who, 
with  their  awkward  size  and  lack  of  sensibility, 
suggested  giants  rather  than  maids.  Even  when 
the  parts  were  taken  by  children,  there  was  a 
complete  want  of  verisimilitude  in  the  shrill  treble 
of  the  young  '  eyases '  who  cried  '  out  on  the  top 
of  question,' 2  when  it  was  remembered  that  low- 
speaking  maidens  were  being  represented.  Possibly 
more  than  one  contemporary  was  longing  for  a 
more  fitting  treatment  of  those  womanly  parts 
which  were  the  glory  of  their  age  of  the  drama. 

1  Cf.  the  Prologue  written  by  Thomas  Jordan  for  the  revival  of 
Othello,  when  for  the  first  time  the  part  of  Desdemona  was  taken 
by  a  woman,  Mrs.  Hughes  (December  8,  1660): 

*  For  to  speak  truth,  men  act,  that  are  between 
Forty  or  fifty,  wenches  of  fifteen, 
With  bone  so  large  and  nerve  so  uncompliant : 
When  you  call  "Desdemona,"  enter  giant.' 

2  Hamlet,  11.  ii.  344. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     209 

Of  Shakespeare's  own  wish  there  can  be  no 
question. 

When  Rosalind  in  the  Epilogue  to  As  You 
Like  It  promised  to  kiss  as  many  men  as  pleased 
her  if  she  were  a  woman,  the  usual  method  of 
female  representation  is  merely  implied,  though 
there  is  a  tinge  of  regret  in  the  avowal.  The 
same  custom  is  also  merely  hinted  at  when  Julia,1 
disguised  as  a  youth,  playfully  boasts  of  having 
taken  the  part  of  Ariadne  at  the  Pentecost 
pageant.  But  it  is  in  the  mouth  of  Cleopatra, 
the  most  passionate,  the  most  sensitive  of 
all  his  women  characters,  that  a  definite  protest 
is  placed  by  the  poet.  On  her  downfall  she 
moans  that  the  love-ties  between  Antony  and 
herself  will  be  desecrated  at  a  later  day  by  '  some 
squeaking  Cleopatra  boy/2  intended  to  stage 
her  greatness.  The  poet  who  created  a  Juliet,  a 
Beatrice,  an  Imogen,  cannot  but  have  wished  for 
his  creatures  to  be  interpreted  on  the  boards 
with  that  passion  and  coy  emotion  which  only 
a  woman's  genius  was  capable  of  imparting. 

In  the  course  of  the  Elizabethan  drama,  there 
becomes  manifest,  too,  certain  features  of  the 
relationship  which  existed  between  the  stage  and 
its  audience.  Then,  as  now,  the  audience  would 
be  mixed  in  character.  Some  would  have  come c  to 

1  Two  Gentlemen  of  Verona,  iv.  iv.  160  ff. 

2  Antony  and  Cleopatra,  v.  ii.  218. 

O 


210    SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

take  their  ease  and  sleep  an  act  or  two  .  .  .  others 
to  hear  the  city  abused  extremely,  and  to  cry, 
<c  That 's  witty."  ' l  There  would  be  Lord's  rooms 
for  the  grandees,  which  corresponded  most  nearly 
with  the  modern  stage-boxes.  But  the  fashion- 
able young  gallants  would  have  stools  on  the 
stage 2  where  they  would  be  attended  by  impudent 
boys  who  saw  to  their  pipes,  fetched  their  ale, 
and  begged  for  money.  These  young  bucks 3 
would  hie  to  the  theatre  after  their  dinner,  and 
a  well-known  character  would  cause  a  murmur 
on  entering  the  house.  His  companions  in  great- 
ness would  salute  him  on  the  stage  ;  he  would 
choose  his  comrade,  take  his  seat,  and  start  his 
quizzing.  In  the  audience,  besides,  there  might 
be  ladies,  but  they  wore  black  masks,  for  more 
reasons  than  one,  and  kept  aloof  from  the  stage 
and  the  pit  alike.  In  the  latter  place  would 
surge  the  groundlings,4  who  were  of  varying 
degrees  of  worthlessness.  There  would  be 
the  critics  with  their  pocket-books  or  '  writing- 
tables  '  ;5  those  also  whose  living  was  dishonestly 
made  by  industrious  pirating  of  plays.  There 
would  be  '  your  sinful  sixpenny  mechanic '  and 

1  Henry  FIIL,  Epilogue. 

2  Cf.   Webster's    Introduction  to  Marston's   Malcontent,   vol.   i. 
p.  199. 

3  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Woman  Hater,  i.  iii. 

4  Hamlet,  in.  ii.  12.       5  Marston,  Malcontent,  Induction,  18  j  and 
Jonson,  Every  Man  out  of  his  Humour,  iv.  ii. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     211 

those  c  who  buy  their  sport  by  the  penny.' 1 
There  would  be  the  youths  who  thundered  at  a 
playhouse  and  fought  for  bitten  apples,2  youths 
who  relished  *  only  a  jig  or  a  tale  of  bawdry'3 
and  who  for  the  most  part  were  '  capable  of 
nothing  but  inexplicable  dumb-shows  and  noise ' 4 
— '  clapping,  hissing,  swearing,  stamping,  smiling, 
applauding,  scorning,  liking,  and  reviling.' 5 

During  the  play,  a  gallant  might  rise  to  vex 
the  players  or  to  snub  the  poet.6  He  might 
have  gone  merely  to  exhibit  a  '  cloke ' ;  when  he 
would  c  sit  in  the  view,  salute  his  acquaintances, 
rise  up  between  the  acts  and  let  fall  his  "  cloke."  ' 7 
Shakespeare  does  not  recognise  these  gallants, 
but  they  affected  his  fellow-dramatists  possibly 
to  a  greater  degree  than  they  did  him  ;  for 
they  are  frequently  alluded  to  in  other  than 
Shakespearean  plays,  and  the  allusions  always 
take  the  form  of  protests.  But  the  behaviour  of 
these  vapid  dilettantes  would  often  be  far  prefer- 
able  to  that  of  the  groundlings.  According  to  a 
contemporary,  if  a  looked-for  appearance  did  not 
come  about,  they  would  cry  angrily  'how  they 
were  coney-catched  and  cheated.'  Some  laughed, 

1  Dekker,  Gulfs  Hornbook,  p.  247. 

2  Henry  Fill.,  v.  iii.  63.  3  Hamlet,  n.  ii.  506. 

4  Ibid.,  m.  ii.  14. 

5  Cf.  Taylor's  Revenge,  fol.,  pt.  ii.  p.  145. 

6  Ben  Jonson,  Devil  is  an  Ass,  in.  i.  248. 

7  Ibid.,  i.  iii. 


212     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

some  swore,  some  stamped  and  cursed.  They 
would  pelt  clay  about,  or  stones  and  wood.  One 
would  c  madly  sit  like  bottle-ale  and  hiss '  :  another 
4  madly  would  pluck  off  the  tiles ' ;  while  some 
might  run  '  to  the  door  to  get  again  their 
coin/  * 

But  in  spite  of  all  their  freely-vented  humours> 
Shakespeare's  audiences  must  have  shown  a 
marked  appreciation  of  the  poetic  side  of  the 
drama,  and  have  pieced  out  the  scenic  im- 
perfections with  their  thoughts.2  For  the 
limitations  of  the  contemporary  stage  for  re- 
presenting life's  realities  were  of  the  narrowest. 
It  could  only  give  the  faintest  hint — one 
that  in  its  utter  inadequacy  often  bordered  on 
the  ridiculous — of  such  great  historical  events 
as  Bosworth,3  or  Cade's  rebellion,4  or  of  such 
glimpses  into  Fairyland  as  the  flight  of  Oberon 
with  Titania.  It  could  not  have  been  an  easy 
task  for  spectators  to  see  c  three  ladies  walke  to 
gather  flowers,' 5  and  straightway  take  the  stage 
for  a  garden ;  or  to  c  heare  newes  of  a  shipwreck 
in  the  same  place '  and  immediately  accept  it  for 
a  rock ;  or,  again,  to  realise  that  two  armies 
were  rolling  to  battle  when  *  four  swordes  and 
bucklers  '  were  seen.  It  must  often  have  been 
felt  that  it  was  a  most  faulty  representation  of 

1  Cf.  Taylor's  Revenge  (Works,  fol.,  Part  II.  p.  145). 

2  Henry  V.,  i.  Chorus,  23.  3  Richard  III. 

4  2  Henry  VI.  5  Sidney,  Apologiefor  Poetrie. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     213 

'  majestical  affairs '  when  the  smallest  rearrange- 
ment of  the  stage  had  to  stand  for  a  most 
extensive  change  of  place.  But  despite  the 
apparent  diminution  of  the  difficulty  which  the 
classical  play  had  obtained  in  its  obedience  to  the 
unities,  the  English  Romantic  play  kept  on  its 
even  way  and  attained  a  glory  which  any  crip- 
pling restrictions  of  time  and  play  in  its  action 
would  only  have  decreased.  A  contemporary 
might  condemn  the  Englishman  '  in  the  quality  ' 
as  c  most  vain,  indiscrete  and  out  of  order '  ; 
inasmuch  as  he  grounded  his  work  on  improba- 
bilities. For  '  in  three  hours  he  would  run 
through  the  world,  marry,  get  children,  make 
children  men,  bring  gods  from  heaven  and 
devils  from  hell/ l  But  these  *  indiscretions '  were 
not  unintentionally  made  by  the  dramatists.  If 
the  action  of  a  play  demanded  a  shift  from  the 
English  shores  c  athwart  the  sea ' 2  to  the  *  vasty 
fields  of  France/  or  from  the  atmosphere  of 
spirits  to  the  haunts  of  hempen  homespuns, 
these  demands  were  candidly  made  by  the  poet 
and  readily  met  by  the  public.  They  would 
project  their  felicitous  fancy  to  the  scenes,  as  the 
poet  asked,  and  within  the  wooden  O — the  globe 
—they  would  see 

'  The  very  casques 
That  did  affright  the  air  at  Agincourt,' 3 

1  Cf.  also  Ben  Jon  son,  Every  Man  in  his  Humour,  Prologue. 

2  Henry  7.,  Prologue.  3  /^  ,4> 


2i4     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

or,  in  the  name  of  Time,  use  wings.  There  seems 
to  be  something  very  much  like  a  hint  to  this 
effect  in  that  farcical  c  abridgement/  already 
mentioned,  which  Bottom  the  weaver  and  his 
companions  gave  of  Pyramus  and  his  love.  The 
poet  seems  to  smile  at  the  necessity  for  it,  but 
also  to  claim  the  indulgence  of  the  audience's 
fancy  when  he  there  depicts  the  absurd  make- 
shifts by  which  the  stage  was  trying  to  face  the 
question  of  realistic  art.  For  though  the  lantern 
carried  by  the  '  hardhanded  Athenian  '  could  never 
suggest  c  the  horny  moon/  nor  could  his  hand, 
with  fingers  wide  apart,  suggest  a  crannied  wall 
wherethrough  lovers  might  tell  their  c  compleynt 
of  love/  yet  '  the  best  in  this  kind  are  but  as 
shadows '  ;  and  Shakespeare's  opinion  of  scenical 
shortcomings  would  seem  to  be  that 

1  Never  anything  can  be  amiss 
When  simpleness  and  duty  tender  it ; ' 1 

while  imagination  would  amend  the  worst. 

This  suggestion  gathers  considerable  point 
from  the  fact  that  the  '  properties '  of  Bottom  and 
his  methods  of  illusion  were  in  truth  but  very 
slightly  different  from  those  which  were  in  use 
on  the  best  stages  of  the  day.  There  would 
often  appear  '  on  the  black  stage  for  tragedies 
and  murders  fell ' 2  a  Prologue  armed,3  ushered  in 

1  A  Midsummer  Night's  Dream,  v.  i.  82-3.         2  Lucrece,  vii.  66. 
3  Troilus  and  Cressida,  Prologue,  23. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     215 

by  the  Trumpeter *  who  was  always  a  Prologue's 
prologue.  And  in  this  way  would  the  deficiencies 
of  the  dumb  stage  be  made  good,  and  necessary 
explanations  of  time  and  place  be  given. 

In  addition  to  scenical  deficiencies,  however, 
there  existed  more  than  one  cause  of  complaint 
which  the  true  dramatic  artist  of  the  time  had 
against  the  stage.  The  c  jigging  veins  of  rhym- 
ing mother-wits '  had  passed  away  with  the  earliest 
of  the  dramatists.  But  c  the  conceits/  which 
*  clownage  kept  in  pay,'  were  still  wont  to  dance 
across  the  stage.  The  clown  would  come  '  leap- 
ing in,'  then  £  laugh  and  grin  and  frame  his 
mimic  face/2  He  would  be  'cozened  in  the 
cloth  quarter/  a  rogue  would  leap  out  upon  him 
and  a  *  substantial  watch  steal  in  upon  them  and 
take  them  away  with  mistaking  words.' 3  This  was 
the  tendency  in  stage-practice — a  continual  panto- 
mime— which  must  have  been  most  irksome  to 
those  who  viewed  the  drama  seriously,  and  saw 
in  the  clownage  but  c  a  noise  of  targets  and  a 
fellow  in  a  long  motley  cloak  guarded  with 
yellow.'  * 

Another  abuse  of  the  stage  lay  in  its  continual 
dedication  of  itself  to   bitter  controversial  uses. 

1  Earle,  Microcosmography,  p.  48.  2  Hall,  Satires. 

3  Ben   Jonson,    Induction    to   Bartholomew    Fairy  speaking    of 
Tarleton. 

4  Henry  nil.,  Prologue,  15-16. 


216     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

This  has  been  already  mentioned.  The  gibes 
and  taunts,  which  so  often  filled  the  theatres, 
could  not  but  detract  from  artistic  aims,  and 
these  continual  aspersions  soon  grew  as  hateful, 
save  to  those  closely  interested,  as  the  empty 
bubbles  which  clownage  was  for  ever  blowing. 

Less  widespread  and  less  injurious  was  that 
dramatic  weakness  which  invaded  the  stage  of  the 
early  seventeenth  century,  for  feeding  the  pride 
which  London  citizens  felt  on  account  of  their 
civic  militarism.1  A  grocer's  apprentice  would 
prove  his  valour  in  the  face  of  giants,  according 
to  a  dramatist  who  wished  to  burlesque  the  craze. 
He  would  be  chosen  city-captain  at  Mile-End, 
would  make  a  brave  end,  and  in  falling  would 
utter  some  memorable  words  to  perpetuate  his 
nobility.  These  were  the  main  abuses  of  the 
stage.  It  was,  however,  a  day  when  c  manners, 
now  called  humours,7  2  fed  the  stage.  A  peculiar 
quality  would  so  possess  a  man  as  to  warp  his 
being  and  make  his  powers  and  spirits  all  run  one 
way  ; 3  and  such  unnatural  characters  would  be 
often  staged.  But  though  unnatural  they  were 
not  unreal,  for,  as  Jonson  said  : — 

'  No  country's  mirth  is  better  than  our  own, 
No  clime  breeds  better  matter  for  your  whore, 
Bawd,  squire,  impostor,  many  persons  more.'2 

1  Cf.  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Knight  of  the  Burning  Pestle. 

2  Jonson,  Alchemist,  Prologue. 

3  Cf.  Jonson,  Every  Man  out  of  his  Humour ',  Prologue. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     217 

The  plays  at  the  universities  were  scarcely  in  as 
good  a  way  as  those  in  town.  c  Few  of  the 
university/  wrote  a  contemporary,  '  pen  plaies 
well ;  they  smell  too  much  of  that  writer  Ovid 
and  that  writer  Metamorphosis,  and  talke  too 
much  of  Proserpina  and  Juppiter.' l 

The  main  failing  of  the  English  stage  then,  as 
viewed  by  contemporaries,  was  that  '  indiscretion ' 
which  was  indissolubly  connected  with  the  advance 
of  their  Romantic  drama.  As  compared  with 
foreign  stages,  our  English  one  stood  high.  For 
the  Italian  was  cso  lascivious  in  his  comedies 
that  honest  hearers  ' 2  were  grieved.  The  French- 
man and  the  Spaniard  also  followed  the  Italian 
humour.  But  the  German  was  *  too  holy,'  for  he 
would  '  present  on  every  common  stage '  what  was 
fit  for  the  pulpit.  There  was  much  good  senti- 
ment and  noble  expression  on  the  English  stage. 

The  people  who  found  a  livelihood  in  the 
drama  were  of  various  classes,  but  all  were,  more 
or  less,  dwellers  in  Bohemia.  There  were  stroll- 
ing-players and  players  under  noble  patronage, 
who  would  kneel  on  the  stage  at  the  end  of  their 
play  and  pray  for  their  patron.3  But  patronised 
and  unpatronised  alike  had  to  put  up  with  an 
insulting  public  and  with  the  companionship  of 

1  Return  from  Parnassus,  Part  II.  iv.  v. 

2  Dedication  of  Whetstone's  Prometheus  and  Cassandra. 

3  Cf.  Middleton,  A  Mad  World,  v.  ii. 


2i8     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

oftentimes  rough  fellow-actors.  Shakespeare  felt 
all  this,  and  he  also  felt  the  contempt  which  was 
ever  being  heaped  upon  the  profession  he  had 
chosen.  The  children-actors,  in  Hamlet's  opinion, 
would  only  continue  their  life  on  the  stage  as  a 
last  resort,  '  if  their  means  were  no  better.' l  In 
his  Sonnets  the  great  Dramatist  even  claims  pity 
for  '  his  nature  subdued  to  what  it  works  in/  for 
had  he  not  gone  hither  and  thither  and  made 
himself  a  motley  to  the  view  ? 

Nor  did  the  poets  themselves  always  add 
dignity  to  their  calling,  for  the  c true  note '  of 
such  was  often  '  to  swagger  it  well  in  a  tavern 
or  domineer  in  a  pot-house.' 2 

But  lowest  of  all  was  the  status  of  the  actor  in 
the  country.  In  the  town  he  would  play  on  a 
well-known  stage  ;  his  intention  to  play  would  be 
announced  on  posts  3  in  the  neighbourhood  of  the 
theatre,  while  the  flag  on  the  roof  would  denote 
a  performance  in  progress.4  Travelling  players, 
however,  would  have  humbly  to  '  offer  service '  at 
the  manor  gates  to  the  lord  of  the  house.  They 
would  ask  him  to  accept  their  duty  '  an  't  pleased 
him.' 5  Shakespeare  himself  more  than  once  may 
have  chafed  under  this  servile  necessity  and  under 
the  welcome  c  given  in  the  buttery ' (}  to  those 

1  Hamlet,  n.  ii.  352.  2  Return  from  Parnassus,  n. 

3  Marston,  Scourge  of  Villainy,  vol.  iii.  p.  303. 

4  Cf.  Middleton,  A  Mad  World,  m.  iii. 

5  Taming  of  the  Shrenv,  Induction,  i.  77.  6  Ibid.,  102. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY      219 

who  took  the  parts  of  kings  and  mobled  queens, 
of  world-wide  conquerors  and  mystic  scholars.  It 
was  but  for  a  brief  hour  that  the  actors  of  that 
day,  throned  in  c  Olymp/  would  rule  empires  or 
sell  their  souls  grandly  for  universal  knowledge. 

Seasons  of  want  would  assail  all  alike,  especially 
the  travellers.  But  even  in  town  there  would  be 
the  dead  season  when  '  knights  would  leave  it, 
taverns  grow  dead,'  and  not  a  feather  would  be 
waving  nor  a  spur  jingling  anywhere.  Then 
would  the  players  be  *  at  a  stand/  and  unless 
many  '  get-pennies '  had  come  to  their  aid  in  the 
season  past  and  given  them  the  opportunity  of 
increasing  their  income,  they  would  be  destitute 
and  would  anxiously  await  the  reopening  of  the 
Globe  or  the  Curtain. 

With  regard  to  the  Religion  of  Shakespeare's 
generation  there  is  much  to  be  gathered  from  the 
dramatic  writings.  But  from  no  other  dramatist 
can  the  many-sided  character  of  the  Elizabethan 
religion  be  better  obtained  than  from  Shakespeare  ; 
the  reason  obviously  being  that  he  was  a  partisan 
of  no  one  creed,  while  freely  handling  all.  He 
seems  to  have  regarded  the  conflicting  dogmas  of 
his  time  with  tolerance  and  in  silence.  But  religious 
ceremonies  frequently  occur  as  perfunctory  details, 
though  they  are  never  marked  with  his  approval  or 
disapproval.  A  christening  would  have  its  gossips,1 

1  Two  Gentlemen  of  Verona,  in.  i.  269. 


220     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

its  bearing  cloths,1  and  apostle's  spoons.2 
Maidens  would  be  buried  with  virgin  crants  and 
strewments  ;3  suicides  would  have  burial  in  cross- 
ways  and  floods  ;4  the  marriage  service  would  con- 
sist of  the  vicar's  interrogatives  answered  by  the 
contracting  parties  ; 5  while  the  sexton  would  see 
to  the  '  quaffing  of  muscadel  '6  at  the  church 
door  after  the  ceremony.  Excommunications 
would  be  made  by  bell,  book,  and  candle  ; 7  Ave- 
Marias,  and  beads,8  psalms,9  hymns,10  and  dirges11 
would  all  form  part  of  the  ordinary  service  ; 
there  would  be  good  honest  priests  who  walked 
in  the  ways  of  Sir  Oliver  Martext  or  Friar 
Lorenzo  ;  and  ambitious  clerics  who  mingled 
politics  with  religion.  The  Moor  would  deride 
all  Popish  tricks  and  ceremonies.12  The  Papist 
would  laugh  at  the  Brownist13  and  Puritan.14 
Antonio  would  taunt  Shylock,15  and  Shylock  in 
return  would  swathe  him  in  sarcasm.16  All 
these  reflected  religious  classes  in  Elizabethan 
England,  though  of  course  the  most  numerous 
were  the  orthodox  Catholics  and  fervid  Pro- 

1   i  Henry  VL,  i.  iii.  42.  2  Henry  VHL,  v.  iii.  168. 

3  Hamlet,  v.  i.  240.          4  Midsummer  Nighfs  Dream,  in.  ii.  382. 

6  Taming  of  the  Shrew,  in.  ii.  160.     6  Ibid.,  172. 

7  King  John,  in.  iii.  12. 

8  2  Henry  VL,  i.  iii.  56.  9  Winter  f  Tale,  iv.  ii.  47. 
10  Romeo  and  Juliet,  iv.  v.  88.               n  Ibid. 

12  Titus  Andronicus,  v.  i.  76.  13  Twelfth  Night,  in.  ii.  30. 

14  Ibid.,  n.  iii.  148.  15  Cf.  Merchant  of  Venice,  i.  iii.  in. 

16  Ibid.,  in.  i.  72. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     221 

testants.  Some  again  there  were  who  questioned 
all  religion,  following  in  the  steps  of  Montaigne 
and  Bacon ;  and  unless  Shakespeare  were  alone, 
some  there  would  be  who,  with  a  rare  knowledge 
of  Scripture  and  a  reverence  for  humanity, 
cultivated  a  lofty  religion  dominated  by  no 
creed,  the  tenets  of  which  were  distinct  alike 
from  Puritan  doctrine  and  from  Papal  dogma. 

The  Puritans  who  broke  away  from  the 
Established  Church  on  questions  of  ritual  were 
among  the  most  picturesque  figures  of  a  pictur- 
esque age.  In  Shakespeare,  however,  they  are 
not  highly  coloured.  It  is  to  the  contemporary 
dramatists  that  one  has  to  look  for  a  detailed 
picture  of  the  foibles  and  fancies  which  made 
these  men  of  religion  so  often  ridiculous. 

One  of  the  questions  on  which  they  had 
separated  was  that  of  ritual,  and  in  a  play1  of  the 
time  allusion  is  made  to  the  Puritan  dislike  of 
surplices,  by  mentioning  such  a  one  who  on 
seeing  a  surplice  had  straightway  hung  himself  in 
the  bell-ropes  of  the  church.  '  Puritans/  accord- 
ing to  another  contemporary,  *  were  blown  out  of 
the  church  with  the  loud  voice  of  the  organ : 
their  zealous  spirits  could  not  endure  the 
music/2  Their  attitude  towards  festivals  would 
be  one  of  unbending  hostility.  They  would 
boast  of  keeping  no  holy  days  nor  fasts,  but 

1  Hollander.  2  Lupton,  London  and  Country  Carbonadoed. 


222     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

*  of  eating  most  flesh  on  Fridays/1  To  more 
worldly  things  they  would  be  equally  hostile. 
Like  Hope-on-high  Barnby,2  they  would  follow 
not  the  '  painted  pipes  of  worldly  pleasures ' ; 
they  would  spit  on  the  hobby-horse  as  the  *  beast 
that  signified  destruction.'  Towards  '  sweet 
poetry '  they  would  turn  as  '  venom-bearing 
spiders  '3  and  would  succeed  in  finding  poison, 
whence  others,  like  bees,  drew  the  finest  honey. 
Little  and  diminutive  would  be  the  Puritan  ruff. 
They  would  live  in  charity,  but  would  c  give  small 
alms  to  such  as  were  not  of  the  right  sect.'4  They 
would  say  *  inspired  graces '  which  were  *  able  to 
starve  a  wicked  man  with  their  length.'  They 
would  worship  in  seclusion,  and  seek,  if  need  be, 
lonely  woods,  and  '  obscure  holes.'  To  such, 
bells  would  be  profane,  though  a  tune  might  be 
religious.5  They  of  the  separation  would  hope 
that  all  '  Canaanites '  might  be  converted  and 
stand  up  for  'the  beauteous  discipline'6  against 
the  iniquitous  Rome.  For  those  '  seeds  of 
sulphur,  the  wicked,'  they  would  seek  at  fairs 
and  merry-makings,  and  Tribulation  Whole- 
some, and  numerous  others  of  the  brethren 
would  denounce  with  holy  rage  Spanish  slops, 
idolatrous  breeches,  and  ruffs  of  pride.  The 

1  Middleton,  Familie  of  Lo<ve,  in.  iii. 

2  Fletcher,  Woman  Phased,  iv.  i. 

3  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Triumph  of 'Honour,  ad  fin. 

4  Middleton,  Familie  of  Lo<ve. 

5  Jonson,  Alchemist,  in.  ii.  6  Ibid.,  HI.  i. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     223 

more  worldly  members  would  rail  against  plays  in 
general  to  please  the  Alderman  whose  '  daily 
custard'1  they  devoured;  while  others  like  Zeal-of- 
the-land  Busy  would  enrich  themselves  by  cozen- 
ing heirs  with  whose  inheritances  they  had  been 
intrusted.2  In  spite  of  all,  their  tenets  advanced 
and  their  influence  was  felt,  for  Jonson  ridiculed 
the  city  magistrates  for  showing  their  religion  by 
*  pulling  down  a  superstitious  cross  and  advancing 
a  Venus  in  place  of  it.'8  If  there  were  more 
Puritans  like  Mr.  Mulligrub,  whose  last  words 
breathed  forgiveness  to  all  his  creditors/  there 
would  be  some  warrant  for  attaching  to  the 
Puritan  discipline  more  humour  than  at  present 
the  sect  has  credit  for. 

Besides  the  creeds,  the  questions  of  royalty  and 
princely  right  gave  rise  at  the  time  to  many  a 
dispute  ;  and  on  these  monarchical  institutions 
Shakespeare  has  bestowed  some  attention  in  his 
works,  and  to  them  has  given  repeated  praise. 
After  the  break-up  of  feudalism,  the  Crown 
began  to  proclaim  the  Divine  Right  in  tones 
stentorian  :  and  King  James  found  a  style  for 
himself  in  '  His  Most  Sacred  Majesty.'  But  this 
view  of  the  King  was  not  in  absolute  agreement 
with  the  idea  entertained  in  general  by  his  people 
on  the  subject.  The  broader  minds  would 
remember  '  what  infinite  heart's  ease  must 

1  Jonson,  Alchemist,  in.  ii.  2  Jonson,  Bartholomew  Fair. 

3  Cynthia's  Revels,  i.  i.  *  The  Puritan. 


OF  THF 

UNIVERSITY 

or 
H 


224    SHAKESP£M^#ND  HIS  DAY 


kings  neglect  that  private  men  enjoy';1  but 
in  that  cause  for  gratitude,  might  find  no  reason 
for  the  admission  of  a  Divine  prerogative.  Many 
an  Elizabethan  would  doubtless  say  'the  king  is 
but  a  man  as  I  am,'  .  .  .  his  ceremonies  laid  by,2 
and  would  find  increased  difficulty  in  subscribing 
to  that  divinity  which  was  said  to  hedge  about  a 
king.  Those  popular  opinions  which  in  the  reign 
of  James's  successor  were  destined  to  inflict  so 
severe  a  blow  on  the  Crown,  were  already  gathering 
strength.  *  What 's  a  Prince  ? '  rhetorically  asked  a 
character  in  Chapman's  Gentleman  Usher,  ten  years 
before  Shakespeare's  death. 

'  Had  all  been  virtuous  men, 
There  never  had  been  Prince  upon  the  earth, 
And  so  no  subject :  all  men  had  been  Princes  : 
A  virtuous  man  is  subject  to  no  Prince, 
But  to  his  soul  and  honour.'3 

To  the  people  of  the  time,  unscrupulous 
policies  and  Machiavellian  scheming,  however 
firmly  they  might  seat  a  monarch  on  the  throne, 
could  never  confer  the  least  pretence  to  Divine 
Right.  And  these  opinions  were  not  unshared 
by  Shakespeare.  The  unscrupulous  policy  of  the 
throne,  the  intemperate  abuse  of  royal  power,  and 
the  evils  accruing  to  each,  were  unmistakably 

1  Henry  V.,  iv.  i.  234.  2  Ibid.,  iv.  i.  100. 

3  Actv. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     225 

shadowed  in  his  great  historical  plays.  And 
Bolingbroke,  when  a  century  later  he  evolved  his 
theory  of  the  c  Patriot  King/  might  have  found 
the  leading  points  of  his  subject  laid  down  in 
these  same  works  of  Shakespeare. 

Towards  superstition,  that  remnant  of  the  dark 
ages,  which  was  still  potent  in  the  Jacobean  era,, 
Shakespeare's  attitude  was  very  much  akin  to  that 
of  Jonson  and  Middleton.  All  the  authors 
whose  plays  were  acted  on  the  London  stage  were 
free  from  mystical  prejudices.  They  had  no 
belief  in  the  fanciful  deceptions  of  medieval 
science,  or  medieval  ignorance.  But  they  did 
not  spurn  the  use  of  the  same  for  stage  effects, 
while  occasionally  they  staged  the  dark  fancies 
merely  to  deride  them  for  the  comfort  of  the 
credulous.  Shakespeare,  who  repeatedly  intro- 
duced the  air  of  magic  and  the  sorcerer's  craft 
into  his  many  dramas,  seems,  like  his  fellows, 
to  have  rejected  the  chimeras  so  elaborately 
asserted  by  the  *  black  creeds '  which  flourished 
at  the  time,  and  hailed  from  c  Lapland ' *  and 
Germany. 

In  the  Tempest,  unicorns  and  the  Arabian 
phcenix  are  jestingly  touched  upon  as  delusions 
born  of  the  travellers'  coloured  tales.2  The  lines 
of  the  hand,  the  chiromantical  signs,  are  scoffed 
at  by  the  clownish  Launcelot  Gobbo  in  the 

1  Comedy  of  Errors,  iv.  iii.  n.  2  Tempest,  HI.  Hi.  22. 

P 


226     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

Venetian  comedy,1  while  the  interpretation  of 
dreams  is  brought  in  later  as  a  laughable  detail.2 

When,   again,   Owen   Glendower,   boasting    of 
supernatural  wiles,  narrates  how  at  his  birth 

'  The  frame  and  huge  foundation  of  the  earth 
Shaked  like  a  coward,' 3 

and  how  the  heavens  were  all  on  fire.  Hotspur's 
blunt  common-sense  humorously  suggests  that  the 
earth  shook  to  see  the  heavens  on  fire;  and  he 
petulantly  rails  at  the  Welsh  sorcerer's  c  skimble- 
skamble  '  tales, 

*  Of  the  dreamer  Merlin  and  his  prophecies, 
And  of  a  dragon  and  a  finless  fish, 
A  clip-winged  griffin  and  a  moulten  raven.'  4 

But  the  age  was  susceptible  in  no  small  degree  to 
omen.  After  a  local  murder  the  gossips  would 
recollect  having  heard  '  lamenting  in  the  air, 
strange  screams  of  death,'  such  as  had  racked  the 
ear  before  the  murder  of  Duncan.  They  would 
have  noticed  that  times  of  national  stress  had  been 
duly  heralded  by  portentous  meteors,  which  did 
*  fright  the  fixed  stars  of  heaven,'  and  by  '  lean- 
looked  prophets/  who  did  '  whisper  fearful 
change.' 5 

Legends   would    be    jealously   hoarded  :    how 
Queen  Eleanor  had  sunk  at  Charing  Cross,  and 

1  Merchant  of  Venice,  n.ii.  151.  2  Ibid.,  n.  v.  18. 

3  i  Henry  W.,  in.  i.  17  ff.  4  Ibid.,  150  ff. 

6  Richard  //.,  n.  iv.  u. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     227 

had  risen  again  at  Q^ueenhithe  ; x  how  the  owl  that 
hooted  was  a  baker's  daughter  who  had  churlishly 
refused  a  loaf  to  the  suffering  Christ.2 

By  almanacs 3  they  would  think  to  *  choose 
good  days  and  shun  the  critical/  To  odd 
numbers  was  attached  a  strange  divinity.* 
An  image  of  wax  melted  before  a  fire  would 
bring  slow  sickness  on  the  person  represented  ; 5 
moles  and  harelips  °  were  *  scars  prodigious.' 
There  would  be  planets  of  good  luck,7  and  planets 
adverse  ;8  dancing'^stars,4'  and  stars  that" "poured 
downjplagues.10  Some  wouToTrnaTEe  guilty  of  their 
disasters  ( the  sun,  the  moon,  and  the  stars/  n  as  if 
they  were  ^villains  by  necessity,  fools  by  heavenly 
compulsion,  knaves,  thieves  and  treachers  by 
spherical  predominance.'  But  Shakespeare  con- 
demned all  this  as  c  the  excellent  foppery  of  the 
world,'  and  Fletcher  took  up  the  same  attitude 
when  one  of  his  clowns,  who  stood  in  fear  of  a 
conjurer  and  his  whirlwinds,  was  urged  by  way  of 
comfort  '  not  to  believe  there  is  any  fetch  in 
astrology.' 12 

The  people  who  were,  however,  wedded  to  the 

1  Middleton,  Witch,  i.  i.  2  Hamlet,  iv.  v.  41. 

3  Cf.  Antony  and  Cleopatra,  I.  ii.  154. 

4  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  v.  i.  4.  5  King  John,  V.  iv.  23. 

6  Midsummer  Nighfs  Dream,  v.  ii.  42. 

7  Richard  III.,  iv.  iv.  403.  8  i  Henry  VI.,  i.  i.  54. 
9  Much  Ado  about  Nothing,  n.  i.  328. 

10  Lovers  Labour  V  Lost,  v.  ii.  394. 

11  King  Lear  i.  ii.  121  ff.  12  Fair  Maid  of  the  Inn. 


228     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

mysteries  of  astrology  would  also  find  an  awfulness 
surrounding  witches  and  their  craft.  A  book  had 
been  written  by  Scott,  c  discovering '  witches,  and 
refuting  their  claims  to  supernatural  power.  But 
its  good  sense  was  unheard  in  the  general  chorus 
of  superstition ;  and  in  the  year  of  the  Armada 
a  bishop  flattered  the  c  craft '  by  appealing  against 
its  workers.  In  a  subsequent  crusade,  seventy  old 
women  were  burnt,  having  been  collected  from 
quite  a  small  area  ;  and  the  age  became  more  than 
ever  convinced  that  every  beldam  who  did  not 
sleep  at  night  was  a  hag  in  character  and  a  witch 
by  profession.  When  James's  bride  met  with 
bad  weather  on  her  way  to  Scotland/  that  mon- 
arch unhesitatingly  attributed  it  to  the  influence 
of  witches.  Before  he  entered  England  he  had 
written  a  tract  maintaining  the  reality  of  those 
evil  spirits  ; 2  and  after  his  accession  to  the  English 
throne,  a  statute  was  passed  against  their  baneful 
practices.3  {  Blasted  heaths  '  and  lonely  dwellings 
were  generally  supposed  to  be  the  abodes  of  these 
malignant  beings,  while  yew-trees  and  damp 
churchyards  were  also  among  their  favourite 
haunts.4  The  eerie  creatures  would  love  the 
foul  '  taking  airs ' 5  of  midnight ;  would  sail 
in  a  sieve6  through  blizzard  and  thunder,  or 
fondle  their  familiars,  cats  and  toads,  on  windy 

1  1589.  2  1599,  Demonology.  3  1604. 

4  Stephens,  Essays,  ii.  20.  6  King  Lear,  n.  iv.  164. 

8  Macbeth,  I.  iii.  8. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     229 

moors.  Their  presence  in  such  places  was  often 
detected  by  terrified  rustics  on  hearing  '  the  mew 
of  the  brinded  cat/  or  '  the  whine  of  the  hedge- 
hog/ l  If  they  dwelt  in  low  cottages,  '  the 
melancholy  darkness  would  encourage  the  con- 
jecture of  infernals '  ; 2  they  would  mumble 
wicked  charms,  and  use  spells  and  periapts.8 
They  could  control  the  moon 4  and  assume  at  will 
the  form  of  any  animal,  but  always  tailless.6  On 
Christmas  night,  however,  their  malignity  left 
them,6  and  all  the  hateful  charms  of  even  a 
Sycorax  were  then  of  no  avail.  To  conjurers  were 
attributed  none  of  these  malignant  tendencies. 
They  would  sit  publicly  within  a  circle,7  summon 
up  devils,  and  so  prove  their  mastery  over  the 
prince  of  that  tribe.  Witches,  on  the  other  hand, 
were  held  to  be  his  apprentices,8  the  ready  instru- 
ments of  his  evil  designs. 

The  devil  was  no  mere  product  of  the 
fancy  to  the  average  Elizabethan.  The  '  lordly 
monarch  of  the  North/  9  when  he  approached  his 
victim,  was  supposed  to  put  on  pleasing  forms, 
*  to  suggest  at  first  with  heavenly  shows/ 10  or  '  to 
haunt  with  voice  of  the  nightingale.'  n  But  the 

1  Macbeth,  iv.  i.  i.  2  Stephens,  Essays,  ii.  20. 

3  i  Henry  PI.,  V.  iii.  2.  *  Tempest, v.  i.  270. 

5  Macbeth,  i.  iii.  9.  6  Cf.  Hamlet,  i.  i.  160  ff. 

7  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Woman  Hater,  v.  v. ;  also  Richard  III., 
I.  ii.  34. 

8  Fair  Maid  of  the  Inn,  n.i. ;  iv.  ii.       9  i  Henry  VL,  v.  iii.  5. 
10  Othello,  n.  iii.  349.  u  King  Lear,  in.  vi.  30. 


230     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

credulous  usually  associated  him  with  the  person 
of  a  negro,  or  else  of  a  Moor,  for  he  was  known 
to  have  assumed  such  shapes.  He  had  £  cloven 
feet,  black  saucer  eyes,  and  nostrils  breathing 
fire/ l  when  he  appeared  in  his  awfulness  ;  but 
on  occasion  he  could  instil  his  poison  as  a 
<  black,  ill-favoured  fly.' 2  The  £  Edgar '  of  King 
Lear,  with  the  demons  which  possess  him,  is 
merely  a  reproduction  of  a  contemporary  case  of 
possession  by  the  devil — one  Richard  Mainey, 
whose  madness  was  dissected  and  described  in 
detail  by  a  learned  cleric,  called  Harsnett,  of  the 
time.  The  poet's  commentary  on  demonology 
here,  however,  is  sufficiently  plain.  His  treat- 
ment must  have  caused  more  than  one  credulous 
being  to  doubt  the  beadle,  and  to  wonder  whether 
every  decrepit  soul  given  to  dreaming  dreams  was 
indeed  possessed,  and  whether  they  deserved  the 
ducking  or  the  burning  they  received  in  conse- 
quence. But  a  wretch  within  whom  Satan  was 
thought  to  be  housed  might  also  be  bound  in 
some  dark  room,  and  have  the  devil  whipped  outv 
as  Shakespeare's  schoolmaster  Pinch  advised  in  an 
early  play.3  It  was  a  senseless  treatment  for  any 
maniac  ;  but  it  illustrates  the  hold  which  the 
ruthless  creed  of  demonology  possessed  on  the  age. 

1  Massinger,  Christian  Martyr ,  in.  Hi. 

2  Titus  Andronicus,  in.  ii.  66. 

3  Comedy  of  Errors,  iv.  iy.  945  cf.  also  As  You  Like  It,  in.  v.  394. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     231 

Other  visitants  from  the  spirit  world  with 
whom  the  Elizabethans  were  familiar  were  the 
ghosts,  '  those  extravagant  and  erring  spirits,' l 
who  at  times  would  revisit  '  the  glimpses  of  the 
moon.'  A  '  spirit  of  health '  would  appear  with 
charitable  intention,  and  in  his  train  would  bring 
'  airs  from  heaven '  ;  while  a  '  goblin  damned  ' 
would  come  with  evil,  breathing  on  mortals 
'  blasts  from  hell.' 2  Such  ghosts  were  best  defied 
by  Latin  exorcisms  ;  but  at  the  cock's  warning  of 
the  day's  approach,3  when  the  glow-worm  paled 
his  uneffectual  fire,4  each  restless  spirit  would 
glide  shrieking  to  the  churchyard  5  from  whence 
it  came.  These  would  be  the  c  mortified  spirits, 
doomed  for  a  time  to  walk  the  night.'  Other 
spectral  visions  might  be  mere  creatures  of  feverish 
brains,  embodied  symbols  of  remorseful  ambition 
or  criminal  activity;  and  when  Shakespeare  dis- 
tinguishes between  the  two,  as  he  does  in  Hamlet, 
and  elsewhere,  he  is  no  doubt  following  a  dis- 
tinction maintained  in  his  day. 

Ostensibly  in  search  of  communication  with 
the  world  of  spirits  were  found  the  alchemists, 
who  had  for  their  aim  the  conversion  of  baser 
metals  into  gold  and  silver.  Their  frauds  were 
notoriously  great,  but  the  native  credulity  greater. 

1  Hamlet,  i.  i.  155.  2  ibid.,  i.  iv.  40. 

3  Ibid.,  I.  i.  150.  4  Ibid.,  i.  v.  90. 

5  Julius  Casar,  n.  ii.  24. 


232     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

The  earliest  of  their  kind  were  honest  seekers 
for  supernatural  lore,  but  the  Elizabethan  repre- 
sentatives were  knaves  and  rogues  and  successful 
quacks.  Lyly  had  exposed  them  in  his  Gallathea. 
But  their  artifices  were  finally  laid  bare  by  the 
remorseless  Jonson  in  his  play  of  the  Alchemist. 
They  would  cozen  with  '  hollow  coles  and  dust 
scrapings/  and  search  for  things  lost  with  a  sieve 
and  shears.  They  would  impose  on  the  simple 
with  their  beech-coal  and  corsive  waters,  their 
crosslets  and  crucibles,  their  retorts  and  receivers, 
their  pelicans  and  bolt-heads.1  These  would  be 
their  apparatus,  and  their  operations  would  be 
conducted  with  a  suggestive  secrecy,  and  their 
results  related  in  a  terrifying  jargon. 

But  the  superstition  which  swayed  king  and 
peasant  alike  could  also  take  attractive  forms. 
The  simple  minds  which  recoiled  before  devil- 
lore  and  black  magic  could  people  their  meadows 
and  forests  with  fairies  and  elves,  or  indulge  their 
fancies  in  that  folklore  which  bound,  and  still 
binds,  the  past  with  the  present.  Every  country- 
side would  have  its  poetic  myths,  fancy- born  and 
harmless,  with  which  to  enliven  their  many  meetings 
and  to  invest  with  significance  the  common  things 
of  life.  The  toad  would  have  a  precious  jewel 2 
which  would  guard  against  poison  ;  the  purple 

1  Jonson,  Alchemist,  I.  i.  j  IV.  iii.,  etc. 

2  As  You  Like  It,  n.  i.  13. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     233 

flower,  love-in-idleness,1  would  have  love  in  its 
gift ;  the  turquoise 2  faded  or  brightened  with 
the  health  of  its  wearer ;  the  ruddock 3  with 
charitable  bill  would  strew  graves  with  flowers ; 
the  knot-grass  4  would  hinder  human  growth  ;  the 
fern-seed  5  was  a  herb  that  would  give  invisibility  ; 
the  eye  of  a  cockatrice6  possessed  death-darting 
powers ;  the  mandrake's  groan 7  was  ever  a  sign 
of  death;  while  the  chameleon8  was  an  animal 
that  lived  on  air. 

But  the  innate  poetry,  as  well  as  the  majesty 
and  youthfulness  of  the  Elizabethan  mind,  is 
nowhere  more  gloriously  revealed  than  in  its 
conception  of  that  moonlit  music-haunted  world 
where  fairies  move  ;  those  banks  they  still  trip 
along, 

1  Where  the  wild  thyme  blows, 
Where  ox-lips  and  the  nodding  violet  grows  ; 
Quite  over-canopied  with  luscious  woodbine, 
With  sweet  musk-roses,  and  with  eglantine.'9 

There  were  black  fairies  and  grey  fairies,  fairies 
green  and  fairies  white,10  *  elves  of  hills,  brooks, 

1  Midsummer  Nighfs  Dream,  n.  ii.  169. 

2  Cf.  Ben  Jonson,  Sejanus;  and  Merchant  of  Venice,  in.  i.  125. 

3  Cymbeline,  iv.  ii.  224. 

4  Midsummer  Nighfs  Dream,  in.  ii.  329. 

5  i  Henry  17.,  n.  i.  93.  6  Romeo  and  Juliet,  in.  ii.  47. 
7  2  Henry  VL,  in.  ii.  310.  8  Hamlet,  HI.  ii.  95. 

9  Midsummer  Night's  Dream,  n.  ii.  190. 

10  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor,  v.  v.  41. 


234     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

standing  lakes,  and  groves/  1  who  would  fly  under 
the  moon's  cold  light 

'  Over  hill,  over  dale, 

Thorough  bush,  thorough  brier, 
Over  park,  over  pale, 

Thorough  flood,  thorough  fire/  2 

to  keep  their  revel  in  the  fairy  ring,  with  other 
4  moonshine  revellers '  who  hailed  from  far-off 
green  or  fountain  clear.  Queen  Mab3  would 
be  there — she  who  c  plats  the  manes  of  horses 
in  the  night/  No  bigger  than  an  agate  stone, 
she  would  be  drawn  with  her  *  team  of  little 
atomies/  Her  'waggoner'  would  be  a  small 
grey-coated  gnat,  her  chariot  an  empty  hazel- 
nut.  She  would  come  from  driving  through 
lovers'  brains  to  give  them  dreams  of  love  ;  or 
over  courtiers'  knees  to  make  them  dream  of 
curtsies.  Did  she  tickle  a  parson's  nose  as 
he  lay  asleep,  he,  good  man,  would  straight- 
way dream  of  benefices ;  a  soldier  touched, 
would  dream  of  cutting  foreign  throats.  Some 
would  come  from  golden  sands  where  they,  all 
day,  would  chase  c  the  ebbing  Neptune '  with  their 
printless  feet,  and  fly  in  turn  with  breathless  haste 
when  he  returned.4  Sea-nymphs,  too,  from  ocean 
depths,  where  they  would  hourly  ring  their 
gloomy  knells  for  those  who  had  suffered  a  sea- 

1  Tempest,  v.  i.  33.  2  Midsummer  Night's  Dream,  n.  i.  2  ff . 

3  Romeo  and  Juliet^  i.  iv.  50  ff.  *  Tempest^  V.  i.  34. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     235 

change.1  Puck  would  be  there,  fresh  from 
beguiling  c  the  fat  and  bean-fed  horse  * 2  by 
neighing  like  a  foal,  or  from  bobbing  against  a 
gossip's  lips  as  she  drank  from  her  evening  bowl. 
As  Robin  Goodfellow,  he  might  have  success- 
fully frightened  some  village  maids,  and  would 
relate  with  mirth  to  night-tripping  fairies — them- 
selves guilty  of  changeling  tricks3 — how  he  had 
'  bootless  made  the  breathless  housewife  churn/ 2 
or  led  astray  c  night  wanderers.' 2  Amidst  the 
throng  of  elvish  sprites  would  be  goblins  and 
owls,  who  were  best  obeyed  by  simple  mortals, 
for  they  could  '  suck  out  breath  or  pinch  us 
blue ' ;  while  some  outside  the  ring  would  be 
busily  making  c  green-sour  ringlets ' 4  which  the 
ewe  could  not  bite  ;  and  others  planting  midnight 
mushrooms.  The  *  joiner  squirrel'5  would  be 
looking  on  ;  and  the  old  grub, c  the  fairies'  coach- 
maker,'  would  leave  his  work  to  taste  society. 
Within  the  ring  the  Fairy  Queen  would  hold  her 
court  attended  by  her  pensioners,  the  '  cowslips 
tall,' 6  and  the  tiny  Pease-Blossom,  Cobweb,  Moth, 
and  Mustard-Seed.  Her  loyal  subjects  would 
seek  for  dewdrops,  then  hang  them  as  pearls  on 
every  cowslip's  ear.  They  would  kill  the  cankers 

1  Tempest,  i.  ii.  380.  2  Midsummer  Night's  Dream,  n.  i.  45. 

3  Winter's  Tale,  in.  iii.  119.  4  Tempest,  v.  i.  37. 

5  Romeo  and  Juliet,  i.  iv.  69. 

6  Midsummer  Right's  Dream,  n.  i.  10. 


236     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

in  the  musk-rose  buds,  '  war  with  rear-mice,'  and 
with  their  leathern  wings  make  coats  for  smaller 
elves.1  For  the  queen's  comfort  they  would  keep 
back  '  the  clamorous  owl  that  nightly  hoots,'  and, 
frightened  themselves,  would  seek  the  acorns' 
cups.  The  dawn  would  disperse  them.  '  Follow- 
ing darkness  like  a  dream '  they  would  hasten  to 
couch  in  cowslips'  bells  and  wait  once  more  for 
the  moon  to  call. 

Such  was  the  c Faerie'  of  Elizabethan  England. 
It  was  an  age  in  which  a  ray  of  moonshine 
was  held  to  be  a  path  along  which  delicate  and 
unsubstantial  creatures  were  tripping  their  aerial 
rounds.  Just  as  a  lurid  glare  was  spread  over 
moor  and  glen  by  Celtic  imagination,  lighting  up 
witches  and  their  magic,  so  over  softer  meadows 
shone  that  faint  afterglow  of  medieval  Fairyland, 
which  daily  fed  the  thoughts  of  peasants  and  the 
pens  of  poets. 

1  Midsummer  Night's  Dream,  n.  iii.  2  ff. 


ENVOY 

AN  attempt  has  now  been  made  to  recall,  from 
materials  of  the  drama,  something  of  England's 
aspect  as  Elizabeth  and  her  successor  knew  it. 

Allusions  were  found  ranging  from  the  monarch 
on  the  throne  to  persons  of  low  degree ;  from 
the  proudest  and  most  upright  courtier  to  the 
most  evil  notoriety ;  from  events  of  national 
import  to  mere  local  incidents  ;  from  international 
politics  to  civic  enactments. 

But  more  important  perhaps  than  all  these 
were  those  permanent  details  of  the  life  of 
that  day  which  emerged,  details  connected  with 
types  and  classes,  customs  and  manners,  which 
from  their  very  nature  fix  the  characteristics 
of  that  age  and  furnish  what  is  most  stable 
and  essential. 

The  period  from  which  these  gleanings  were 
made  embraced  for  the  most  part  the  reigns 
of  two  monarchs,  some  seventy  years  in  duration, 
and  nothing  more  has  been  attempted,  up  to  the 
present,  than  to  draw  in  broad  outline  the  general 
characteristics  of  that  period  as  a  whole. 


i87 


23 8     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

It  is,  however,  at  once  obvious  that  in  so  ex- 
tended a  period  the  national  conditions  were 
continually  undergoing  slow  changes,  which 
would  not  be  without  effect  on  the  national 
character  and  customs.  And  just  as  it  has  been 
hitherto  maintained  that  the  features  of  the  age 
lie  imprinted  on  the  drama,  so  by  further  dis- 
crimination it  is  possible  to  obtain  from  those 
topical  reflections  a  finer  appreciation  of  the 
national  phases  which  began  with  Elizabeth  and 
ended  with  James. 

In  Marlowe  and  Shakespeare  we  see  the  Eng- 
land of  the  latter  half  of  the  sixteenth  century, 
young  and  vigorous,  budding  with  hope,  uncor- 
rupted  by  luxury,  not  yet  enervated  by  licence. 
Both  dramatists  reflect  the  high  ideals  which  filled 
the  air,  the  anxiety  to  grapple  with  mighty  pro- 
blems, the  longing  to  discover  new  worlds ;  while 
in  Marlowe  English  contact  with  Germany  is  also 
noticeable,  inasmuch  as  he  employs  as  one  of  his 
c  motives '  that  compact  with  the  devil,  which 
came  with  '  newes  out  of  Germany.'  In  his  c  high 
astounding  terms '  Marlowe  embodies  the  vigour 
of  his  day,  which  made  men  push  off  from 
Devonshire  shores,  or  wander  to  the  Low 
Countries  in  search  of  blows.  The  '  pity  and 
terror '  of  his  Edward  II.  was  only  capable  of 
being  produced  in  an  age  when  the  nerves  were 
highly  strung,  and  when  tragedy  lay  around. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     239 

Shakespeare  took  up  Marlowe's  pen  and 
ranged  still  higher.  He  added  fire  to  Marlowe's 
fire,  and  finer  and  chivalrous  shades  to  Mar- 
lowe's heroics.  The  national  worship  of  their 
great  Queen  found  a  counterpart  in  his  wonder- 
ful picture-gallery  of  noble  heroines.  With 
Lyly  he  occasionally  reflected  the  contemporary 
taste  for  euphuistic  display,  for  Court  pageantry 
and  masques.  He  but  lightly  touched  Puritan 
foibles,  for  they  were  to  become  more  pro- 
nounced when  he  was  dreaming  his  romances. 
Tobacco  and  its  cult  find  no  mention  in  his 
pages,  nor  did  he  choose  to  dwell  on  the  base 
uses  to  which  alchemy  was  growing,  possibly 
because  these  things  attained  to  excess  after  he 
had  done  with  the  world  of  comedy.  Neither 
was  the  great  English  middle  class,  which 
was  merging  into  being  out  of  the  wreck  of 
feudalism,  of  sufficient  strength  to  win  his  atten- 
tion. He  saw  but  a  cultured  class,  whom  he 
treated  with  dignity,  and  an  uncultured  rabble 
which  tickled  his  humour,  when  it  did  not  arouse 
his  spleen.  His  atmosphere  was  pure.  Evil  was 
discord,  as  far  as  he  was  concerned ;  and  his 
plays,  like  the  earlier  part  of  his  age,  found 
more  charm  in  action  and  love  than  in  gossip 
and  intrigue. 

With  Jonson,  who  may,  perhaps,  be  taken  as 
representative  of  the  earlier  part  of  James's  reign, 


24o     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

the  atmosphere  changes.  London  had  been 
rapidly  growing  since  Elizabeth's  accession, 
and  the  march  from  the  country  had  become 
more  emphasised.  Jonson's  pictures  are  there- 
fore more  centralised.  His  main  interest  is 
London — its  haunts  and  its  characters.  His 
great  centre  is  '  Paul's/  with  its  gulls  and  its 
cozeners  ;  and  the  country  scenes  and  sea- 
breezes  of  Shakespeare  are  entirely  wanting. 
The  tension  of  the  Armada  year  had  lapsed 
into  humours  and  excesses,  which  increased  in 
absurdity  day  by  day.  The  gallants  who  on 
occasion  would  rouse  Shakespeare's  satire,  and 
the  vulgar  army  of  penniless  rascals,  became 
more  pronounced  than  ever  in  their  respective 
absurdities  ;  for  the  age  provided  less  action 
than  formerly,  and  the  mind  grew  vapid  with 
very  inertia.  The  Puritans  were  more  assertive, 
more  whining  ;  and  as  they  grew  in  strength,  so 
did  errors  arise,  and  Jonson  takes  care  to  ex- 
plain that  the  world  was  not  always  absent  from 
the  Puritan  fold.  The  chivalry  of  Elizabeth's 
reign  was  waning  already.  It  had  been  swallowed 
up  in  the  empty  affectations  of  gallant  and  lady. 
Affectation  had  also  spread  to  city  dames,  to 
increase  the  confusion ;  and  the  return  to 
feminine  deification  was  farther  off  than  ever. 

Tobacco    had    become    the    fashion,   and   al- 
chemists were  flourishing  in  roguery  and  deceit. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     241 

Superstitions  were  still  potent,  and  not  the  least 
abuse  in  a  credulous  age  was  the  new  institu- 
tion of  '  lying  news-offices/  The  youthful 
ebullitions,  the  hearty  sincerity  and  breezy 
action  of  an  earlier  day  had  given  way  to 
studied  manners  and  credulous  fancies,  which 
were  hard  to  check. 

In  Beaumont  and  Fletcher  also  the  decline  of 
this  period  is  clearly  portrayed,  for  they  drew 
what  was  around  them  in  all  its  frailty.  '  They 
seldom  represent  an  honourable  woman  without 
something  of  Dol  Common  in  her/  for  it  was  a 
day  when  love-sick  ladies  would  disguise  as  pages 
in  the  trains  of  their  loves.  The  Court  of 
James  cared  little  for  the  dignity  of  woman. 
There  was  a  falseness  and  insincerity  in  the 
relations  between  the  sexes.  It  was,  as  the 
drama  reflects,  an  age  of  shameless  intrigue. 
Shakespearean  virtues  were  entirely  lost ;  while 
Jonsonian  foibles  were  ever  exaggerated.  It 
was,  as  a  scholarly  critic  has  described,  { an  age  of 
tyrants  and  their  favourites ;  of  evil  counsellors 
and  evil  counsels ;  of  pandars  and  minions  ;  of 
cloaked  vices  and  bedizened  grossness  ;  of  blatant 
theories  and  systems  ;  of  the  decay  of  principles 
and  beliefs.'1  ' 

Even  the  warlike  ardour  which  had  repelled 
the  Spanish  was  now  a  mere  affectation.  The 

1  A.  W.  Ward,  English  Dramatic  Literature,  ii.  p.  763. 
Q 


242     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

city  train-bands  were  subject  to  hysterics,  and  old 
soldiers  were  commonly  known  to  be  rogues 
and  knaves.  The  political  embassies  despatched 
abroad  were  no  more  dignified  in  character,  as 
Middleton  showed  ;  and  the  frank  criticism  of 
the  monarch,  not  only  in  foreign  polity,  but  in 
his  cherished  realm  of  Divine  right,  illustrates 
that  growing  strength  of  the  Commons,  which  in 
a  couple  of  decades  was  to  revise  the  constitution 
and  modify  the  Government. 

From  this  topical  material  can  also  be  gathered 
certain  information  which,  though  it  may  bear  but 
slightly  on  the  age  in  general,  possesses  yet  some 
interest  in  an  incidental  way. 

From  the  works  of  Shakespeare,  although  they 
teem  with  allusions  to  professions  and  trades, 
nothing  can  be  gathered  to  settle  definitely 
the  calling  he  must  have  followed  at  some 
time  in  his  career.  The  deductions  which  have 
been  made  with  a  view  to  that  discovery  are  so 
very  numerous  and  reasonable  withal,  that  the 
result  is  absurdity.  For  instance,  the  dramatist 
seems  as  familiar  with  drugs  and  salves  as  if  he 
had  spent  years  over  Galen.  But  his  law-terms 
are  equally  bewildering  in  the  accuracy  of  their 
technicalities.  In  educational  matters  he  seems 
quite  practical  and  speaks  with  authority ;  while 
he  also  makes  a  brave  show  of  military  detail. 
So  that,  as  leech  or  lawyer,  usher  or  soldier,  he 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     243 

might  reasonably  be  said  to  have  passed  some 
period ;  but  he  cannot  be  said  with  any  certainty 
to  have  been  any  single  one.  Others  have  tracked 
him  to  a  printing  establishment  on  account  of  his 
intelligence  in  typographical  matters.  But  then 
he  may,  with  equal  reason,  have  served  as  boat- 
swain of  the  Tiger,  trafficking  between  places  like 
London  and  Aleppo,  so  technical  is  his  detail  of 
mariners'  craft.  Or  he  might  have  been  a  gentle 
astringer  in  the  falconry  of  some  grandee,  so  close 
is  his  acquaintance  with  hawks  and  their  ways. 
And  so  possibility  follows  possibility  until  a 
library  has  been  formed,  devoted  to  this  single 
aspect  of  Shakespearean  study ;  a  library  afford- 
ing with  certainty  but  one  conclusion,  namely, 
that  no  amount  of  acuteness  will  enable  a 
critic  to  lay  a  finger  on  any  one  profession  and 
say  that  that  was  the  one  for  which  Shakespeare 
was  intended  or  which  he  followed  for  any  period 
of  his  life. 

After  all,  it  seems  dwarfing  the  genius  of  this 
myriad-minded  man  to  insist  on  the  origin  of 
these  various  technicalities  as  being  necessarily 
personal  experience  and  not  observation.  It  is 
more  than  probable  that  his  encyclopaedic  learning 
was  picked  up  o'  nights  in  the  snug  crowded 
rooms  of  the  Mermaid  or  Boar's  Head.  For 
there  he  must  often  have  listened  to  the  wrang- 
ling of  angry  scriveners,  the  laments  of  practice- 


244     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

seeking  medicoes,  and  the  swaggering  tales  of 
high-booted  swashbucklers,  late  returned  from 
Zutphen  or  from  the  high  seas.  With  his  power 
of  discriminating  and  then  assimilating,  he  would 
readily  absorb  the  details  of  their  prattle.  He 
would  make  their  technicalities  his  own,  whilst,, 
seemingly,  he  was  paying  but  a  passing  regard  to 
their  flying  and  humorous  sallies.  The  topical 
matter  in  Shakespeare,  then,  can  give  no  aid  on 
this  question. 

It  can,  on  the  other  hand,  afford  some  cor- 
roboration  of  what  has  been  fixed  upon  as  the 
probable  chronological  order  of  the  Shakespearean 
plays.  It  would  have  been  better  to  have  said 
the  absence  of  this  topical  matter  corroborates 
the  sequence  ;  for  it  is  a  curious  fact  that,  as  the 
dramatist  advanced  in  life,  he  indulged  less  and 
less  in  those  allusions  which  have  been  charac- 
terised as  '  particular.'  More  curious  still,  in  his 
latest  years,  when  the  £  particular '  allusions  have 
almost  entirely  disappeared,  even  the  c  general ' 
ones,  which  give  the  Elizabethan  colouring,  grow 
somewhat  fainter.  In  this  last  period  it  would 
seem  as  if  the  dramatist  were  attempting  to  attain 
complete  emancipation  from  the  details  of  his  age. 
But  that  necessary  remnant  of  the  spirit  of  the 
age  which,  it  has  been  maintained^  is  never  absent 
from  the  greatest  work,  this  he  could  never 
throw  ofr*. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     245 

In  his  early  plays,  allusions  are  plentiful  to 
country  life  and  to  life  in  the  capital.  The 
personalities  are  drawn  from  the  people  who 
surrounded  him.  Fresh  from  the  glades  of 
Warwickshire  the  young  writer's  efforts  breathe 
of  country  lanes  and  forests,  of  yokels  and  vill- 
age '  tharboroughs.'  Dazzled  by  the  brilliance 
of  great  London  he  gives  a  few  vigorous 
sketches  of  conceited  gallants1  from  Whitehall 
or  Greenwich,  and  quibbling  rogues  spied 
out  in  Bucklersbury.2  When  he  has  drifted 
further  into  the  vortex  of  London,  he  illustrates 
tavern  life  with  its  soldiering  rascals  like  FalstafF 
and  Sir  Toby  Belch,  and  cony-catching  rogues 
like  Nym  and  Bardolph.  He  sketches  the 
manors  of  Pickt-hatch 3  with  their  harlots,  whose 
cheeks  were  beautified  '  with  plastering  art/ 4 
the  bawds  with  their  wickedness  always  before 
their  eyes5 — most  commonly  on  their  middle 
finger — their  rings  *  a  death's  head  or  memento 
mori.J  6 

Then,  when  the  poet  had  risen  in  life,  come 
his  visions  of  stately  houses,  and  he  portrays  as  one 
familiar  at  Windsor,  at  Hampton,  or  at  None- 
such. His  scenes  are  then  the  Courts  of  kings 

1  Valentine  and  Proteus.  2  Speed  and  Lance. 

3  Merry  Wives  of  Windsor ,  n.  ii.  19. 

4  Hamlet,  in.  i.  51.  *  Marston,  Dutch  Courtezan. 
*   i  Henry  IV.  ^  ill.  Hi.  35. 


246     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

like  Elsinore  and  Glamis  Castle  ;  his  converse  is 
of  weightier  mould,  for  he  scorns  the  taffeta  jests 
of  Osric,  the  ways  of  the  courtier  fop,  and  his 
empty  prattle  about  Barbary  horses  and  French 
rapiers.  He  reflects  on  past  history  and  handles 
life's  problems.  And  later,  ere  he  breaks  his  wand, 
he  gradually  discards  that  worldly  phantasmagoria, 
and  dreams  awhile  of  fancy-land  within  that  circle 
where  '  none  durst  walk  but  he.'  The  Tudor 
framework  on  which  his  earlier  characters  were 
formed  is  now  laid  aside.  They  are  still  Eliza- 
bethan, but  less  distinctly  so.  It  is  as  if  his  genius 
had  felt  dwarfed  and  narrowed  by  the  bonds  which 
tied  him  to  the  obvious  realities  of  his  age.  So 
that  in  his  romances  there  are  no  chronicles  of 
fashion,  no  duels,  no  barbered  gallants,  no  enfeebled 
watchman  nor  baubled  clowns.  By  this  time  too 
the  memories  of  the  English  Court  and  its  page- 
ants come  but  faintly  ;  they  are  now  as  distant 
echoes. 

Further  material  for  another  such  rough  chrono- 
logical test  is  furnished  by  the  topical  matter 
which  deals  with  the  gallant  and  his  tricks  of 
conversation. 

Shakespeare  at  first  was  himself  attracted  by 
the  general  craze  and  the  spruce  charm  of  the 
poetic  diction  of  the  hour.  His  early  produc- 
tions are  therefore  tainted  with  a  certain  euphuistic 
glamour  and  they  bristle  with  conceits.  Their 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     247 

person*  are  'antic*  weaklings,  'the  pink  of 
courtesy/1  'the  apes  of  form.'2  Loves  Labour's 
Lost  is  in  fact  a  satire,  among  other  things,  on  the 
1  man  of  complements,' 3  the  trim  gallant  full  of 
courtship  and  of  state,  '  who  takes  his  oath  upon 
his  lady's  pantofles  that  all  excellence  in  madams 
does  but  zany  hers.' 4  Even  Biron,  who  stands 
out  in  contrast  to  Boyet,  has  c  a  trick  of  the  old 
rage.' 5  In  the  Two  Gentlemen  of  Verona  there  is 
the  same  light  banter  which  flies  from  Proteus  to 
Valentine,  and  from  Valentine  to  Silvia.  It  is 
clad  in  gallant  phraseology,  such  as  a  frequenter 
at  the  Palace  or  a  member  of  the  Inns  of  Court 
would  employ  to  dissolve  my  lady's  riddles,  to 
pen  a  sonnet  or  an  acrostic ; 6  and  the  poet  seems 
to  love  lingering  with  the  extravagant  lovers  and 
their  juggling  quips.  With  Mercutio,  Benvolio, 
and  c  the  furious  Tybalt '  in  the  greater  Veronese 
play,  the  poet  discarded  quibbles  and  silken 
phrases  to  some  extent.  He  indulges  at 
this  period  in  images  of  the  daring  '  princox ' 
who  would  throw  into  a  challenge  all  the  grace 
of  a  lover's  declaration,  would  fight  'as  you 
sing  prick-song,'  and,  wounded  by  some  c  foining 

1  Romeo  and  Juliet,  n.  iv.  59. 

2  Love's  Labour  's  Lost,  v.  ii.  325. 

3  Ibid.,  i.  i.  167. 

4  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Queen  of  Corinth,  I.  ii. 

5  Love's  Labour  V  Lost,  v.  ii.  416. 

6  Cf.  Beaumont  and  Fletcher,  Elder  Brother,  in.  v. 


248     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

traverse/  '  not  so  deep  as  a  well  nor  so  wide  as 
a  church  door/ 1  would  die  with  a  last  sarcasm 
for  the  '  scrimers '  that  fight  by  the  book  of 
arithmetic.2  It  is  a  less  artificial  diction,  but  one 
still  tainted  by  the  frailties  of  the  hour. 

Then  comes  the  Midsummer  Nigkfs  Dream 
with  the  splendid  and  gracious  aristocrat  Theseus, 
purged  of  all  the  foibles  of  the  contemporary 
gallants,  replete  with  all  that  is  graceful,  delicate, 
and  pleasing.  His  noble  thoughts  are  many,  his 
diction  is  refined,  while  his  imagination  is  not 
persistently  occupied  with  efforts  to  dazzle  by 
embellished  wit.  Sir  Walter  Raleigh,  who  bowed 
as  he  spread  his  gold-tinselled  cloak  for  the  royal 
foot,  was  a  Biron  or  a  Mercutio.  Theseus  wooing 
Hippolyta  was  an  idealised  Essex  paying  his  court 
to  Lady  Frances  Sidney. 

In  later  plays,  however,  the  poet's  attitude 
towards  these  prevalent  affectations  takes  a  decided 
change.  He  begins  now  to  laugh  at  those  who 
*  climb  o'er  the  house  to  unlock  the  little  gate.' 3 
He  ceases  to  approve  or  even  to  tolerate,  and 
becomes  directly  hostile.  Benedick's  quick  wit 
and  <  queasy  stomach  ' 4  can  no  longer  endure  the 
idle  nothings  of  a  fashionable  tongue.  Jacques  is 
an  exposure  of  the  man  who  had  travelled  and 

1  Romeo  and  Juliet,  in.  i.  100  ff.  2  Ibid.,  in.  i.  107. 

3  Lowe's  Labour 'V  Lost,  I.  i.  109. 

4  Much  Ado  about  Nothing,  n.  i.  399. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     249 

was  affected  in  his  language  by  his  journeyings. 
From  this  time  onwards  in  his  plays  the  poet 
either  entirely  ignores  the  play  of  words  and 
fantastic  imagery,  or  else  exemplifies  them  merely 
for  purposes  of  ridicule,  just  as  Hamlet  shows 
a  fine  contempt  for  all  the  shrouded  humour 
of  the  courtiers  of  Elsinore. 

But  these  topical  allusions,  in  addition  to  being 
useful  as  rough  chronological  tests,  also  possess 
intrinsic  merits  which  give  them  a  claim  to  a 
primary  interest  and  render  them  objects  which 
repay  their  study. 

They  convey,  of  course,  the  externals  of 
Elizabethan  •  life — their  fashions,  their  furniture, 
their  dress,  and  amusements.  But  they  also 
transport  into  our  own  times  the  wit,  the  love, 
the  passion,  and  the  dreams  of  those  who  lived 
then.  These  things  are  of  interest,  not  to 
historians  merely,  but  to  every  thinking  and 
feeling  being  '  that  hath  kept  watch  o'er  man's 
mortality.'  For  the  questions  and  the  problems 
which  underlie  those  passions  are  yet  the  same 
as  those  with  which  we  ourselves  are  grappling. 
Even  the  passing  and  empty  foibles  of  those 
courtiers  around  their  Queen  have  a  rich  signi- 
ficance. They  state  historical  facts  and  give  the 
contemporary  conditions.  But  they  also  do 
more.  They  are  like  the  surface  of  the  sea 
through  which  one  must  peer  to  behold  the 


250     SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY 

depths.  And  Elizabethan  foibles  are  open  avenues 
to  Elizabethan  hearts.  So  that  this  topical  ele- 
ment can  claim  the  double  merit  of  shedding 
light  not  only  on  the  external,  but  also  on  the 
internal  side  of  Elizabethan  life. 

And  yet  the  topical  is  a  field  of  Shakespearean 
study  which  has  hitherto  been  most  inadequately 
worked.  There  is  no  little  truth  in  the  saying 
that  we  admire  by  tradition.  And  when  Ben 
Jonson  described  Shakespeare  as  being  cnot  of 
an  age  but  for  all  time/1  he  was  unconsciously 
setting  the  fashion  for  generations  of  criticism 
which  were  to  follow.  The  critics  have  never 
ceased  to  reiterate  the  universality  of  his  genius 
and  the  universal  application  of  his  writings. 
But  they  have  with  almost  equal  consistency 
persisted  in  overlooking  that  side  of  Shakespeare's 
works  which  links  him  to  his  age.  It  is  as  if 
they  had  neglected  the  foundations  on  which  that 
very  universality  was  built,  the  attainment  of  a 
perfect  harmony  in  subsidiary  characteristics  and 
incidental  details.  So  that  it  has  almost  come 
about  that  they  would  have  him  stand  as  a 
detached  spirit,  whom  patriotism,  on  no  very 
clearly  defined  grounds,  claims  as  an  English- 
man. So  much  has  criticism  confined  its  efforts 
to  expounding  his  universality  that  one  would 
almost  incline  to  think  that  he  must  have  come, 

1  Underwoods,  p.  12. 


SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY     251 

and  written,  and  departed  this  life  without  taking 
into  himself  anything  of  his  surroundings,  or 
breathing  for  a  moment  the  Elizabethan  atmo- 
sphere. And  yet  his  very  universality  arises  out 
of  the  virtue  and  the  accuracy  of  these  his  topical 
allusions.  He  is  true  to  all  ages  because  he  is 
true  to  one.  And  his  greatness  is  perhaps  but 
inadequately  grasped  until  the  details  of  Eliza- 
bethan life  which  exist  in  his  dramas  have  been 
fully  explored  and  appreciated. 

Shakespeare  discharged  what  Goethe  held  to  be 
the  function  of  the  ideal  poet1  when  he  took  up 
into  his  being  the  inharmonious  facts  of  Nature 
and  his  age,  and  gave  them  forth  in  harmonious 
form.  The  world,  and  even  Nature,  is  often 
monotonous,  and  sometimes  discordant.  But 
Shakespeare  imparted  to  the  whole  a  rhythmic 
movement  and  made  them  live.  And  this  he 
did  not  without  the  aid  of  the  topical  device. 

1  Cf.  Goethe,  Faust,  11.  140-149. 


OF  THF 

UNIVERSITY 

OF 


Printed  by  T.  and  A.  CONSTABLE,  Printers  to  His  Majesty 
at  the  Edinburgh  University  Press 


Telegrams  :  41  and  43  Maddox  Street, 

1  Scholarly,  London.'  Bond  Street,  London,  W., 

March,  1906. 


Mr.  Edward  Arnold's 

List  of  New   Books. 


A    STAFF    OFFICER'S    SCRAP-BOOK. 

By  LIEUT.-GENERAL  SIR  IAN  HAMILTON,  K.C.B. 

Demy  8vo.     With  Illustrations,  Maps,  and  Plans. 
i8s.  net. 

General  Sir  Ian  Hamilton's  story  of  the  operations  of  the 
Japanese  First  Army,  under  Marshal  Kuroki,  at  which  he  was 
present  as  British  Attache,  is  generally  recognised  as  the  best 
and  most  authoritative  account  accessible  to  English  readers. 

The  Seventh  Thousand  is  being  rapidly  exhausted — a  remark- 
able testimony  to  the  welcome  accorded  to  this  fascinating 
work,  which  is  described  by  The  Times  as  by  far  the  most  inter- 
esting  book  on  the  Russo-Japanese  War  that  has  yet  appeared 
from  the  pen  of  an  eye-witness. 


LONDON  :  EDWARD  ARNOLD,  41  &  43  MADDOX  STREET,  W. 


2  Mr.  Edward  Arnold's  List  of  New  Books 

SOME  DOGMAS  OF  RELIGION. 

By  JOHN  ELLIS  McTAGGART,  Litt.D., 

LECTURER    IN    MORAL   SCIENCES,    TRINITY   COLLEGE,    CAMBRIDGE. 

Demy  Svo.     IDS.  6d.  net. 

This  book  attempts  to  prove,  in  the  first  place,  that  beliefs  as  to 
certain  matters  of  fact  beyond  our  empirical  experience  are  essen- 
tial for  religion,  and  of  fundamental  importance  for  human  life. 
Secondly,  it  is  maintained  that  such  beliefs  cannot  legitimately  rest 
on  faith,  but  only  on  argument.  Reasons  are  then  given  for  thinking 
that  the  ordinary  objections  to  the  belief  in  human  immortality  are 
fallacious.  It  is  suggested  that  the  most  reasonable  form  for  the 
doctrine  of  immortality  to  take  is  one  which  makes  each  person  to 
have  existed  for  many  years  before  the  existence  of  his  present  body, 
and  perhaps  for  all  past  time.  A  chapter  on  Free- Will  endeavours 
to  show  that  Determinism  must  be  accepted,  and  that  its  acceptance 
would  have  no  bad  effects  on  morality. 


THE 
CHURCH    AND     COMMONWEALTH. 


Ube  Visitation  Cbarges  of  tbe  1Ri0bt  IRev.  Oeorge  IRtoDing,  2>.2>., 
ffirst  Sisbop  of  Soutbwell. 

Collected  and  Edited  by  his  Wife,  Lady  LAURA    RIDDING. 
Demy  8vo.     los.  6d,  net. 

For  some  time  before  his  death  the  late  Bishop  of  Southwell  had 
intended  to  republish  in  a  collected  form  his  Visitation  Charges  to 
his  Diocese.  These  Charges  are  five  in  number,  the  last  of  them, 
which  was  to  have  been  delivered  at  the  Synod  summoned  to  meet 
at  Southwell  on  June  30,  1904,  being  in  the  unfinished  state  in  which 
the  Bishop's  final  illness  found  it.  In  preparing  them  for  the  press, 
Lady  Laura  Ridding  has  omitted  those  passages  which  are  of  purely 
local,  or  of  temporary,  though  public,  interest,  but  in  other  respects 
the  Charges  appear  in  their  original  form,  and  constitute  a  valuable 
body  of  teaching  on  many  of  the  great  Church  questions  of  the  day. 
There  is  a  full  synopsis  of  the  subject-matter,  which  enables  the 
reader  to  see  at  a  glance  the  points  dealt  with  under  such  main 
headings  as  The  Holy  Communion,  The  Law  of  the  Church, 
Education,  etc. 


Mr.  Edward  Arnold's  List  of  New  Books  3 

THROUGH    INDIA    WITH 
THE    PRINCE. 

By  G.  F.  ABBOTT, 

KNIGHT  COMMANDER  OF  THE  HELLENIC  ORDER  OF  THE  SAVIOUR  ; 
AUTHOR  OF  'SONGS  OF  MODERN  GREECE,'  'THE  TALE  OF  A  TOUR  IN  MACEDONIA,'  ETC. 

Demy  8vo.     With  Illustrations. 

Mr.  Abbott,  whose  graphic  and  amusing  description  of  his  last 
visit  to  Macedonia  will  be  well  remembered,  is  at  present  accom- 
panying Their  Royal  Highnesses  the  Prince  and  Princess  of  Wales 
on  their  Indian  tour  as  special  correspondent  of  the  Calcutta 
Statesman.  His  tale  of  this  tour  possesses  a  characteristic  which 
will  probably  distinguish  it  from  other  versions  —  he  attaches 
far  more  importance  to  the  real  condition  of  the  various  peoples 
visited  than  to  the  external  display  made  by  their  rulers.  This  does 
not  mean  that  Mr.  Abbott  fails  to  describe  adequately  durbars  and 
similar  ceremonies.  On  the  contrary,  his  descriptions  of  these 
incidents  are  as  vivid  and  convincing  as  ever.  But  he  does  not 
allow  his  attention  to  be  distracted  by  them  from  the  more  serious 
problems  of  British  rule  in  India,  and  his  record  of  the  Royal 
progress  will  possess  a  more  permanent  value  on  that  account. 


CONCERNING    PAUL    AND 
FIAMMETTA. 

By   L.    ALLEN    HARKER, 

AUTHOR  OF  'THE  INTERVENTION  OF  THE  DUKE,'  (WKE  FOLK,  GOOD  FOLK,'  'A  ROMANCE 
OF  THE  NURSERY,'  ETC. 

With  a  Preface  by  KATE  DOUGLAS  WIGGIN. 
Crown  8vo.     55. 

This  is  a  charming  book  of  the  same  kind  as  Mr.  Kenneth 
Grahame's  '  Golden  Age ' — a  book  about  children  for  grown-ups. 
There  are  five  children,  including  Fiammetta,  full  of  quaint  fancies 
and  amusing  pranks — an  entirely  lovable  little  party,  with  delightful 
dogs  and  a  very  characteristic  Aunt  Eunice. 


4  Mr.  Edward  Arnold's  List  of  New  Books 

SURGICAL  NURSING 

Bnt>  tbe  {principles  of  Surgerg  for  flurses. 
By   RUSSELL   HOWARD,   M.B.,   M.S.,   F.R.C.S., 

LECTURER  ON  SURGICAL  NURSING  TO  THE  PROBATIONERS  OF  THE  LONDON  HOSPITAL  :  SURGEON 

TO  OUT-PATIENTS,  ROYAL  WATERLOO  HOSPITAL  FOR  CHILDREN  AND  WOMEN 

SURGICAL  REGISTRAR,  LONDON  HOSPITAL. 

Crown  Svo.     With  Illustrations.     6s. 

This  is  an  exceedingly  lucid  and  comprehensive  handbook  on  the 
subject,  and  contains  all  the  most  approved  methods  very  clearly 
arranged. 

THE    LAWS   OF    HEALTH. 

By  D.  NABARRO,  M.D.,  B.Sc.,  D.P.H., 

ASSISTANT  PROFESSOR  OF  PATHOLOGY  AND  BACTERIOLOGY,  UNIVERSITY  COLLEGE,  LONDON. 

Crown  8vo.     With  Illustrations,     is.  6d. 

This  volume  takes  the  form  of  a  very  simply-written  primer  of 
health,  in  which  the  direct  application  of  the  science  of  physiology 
to  every-day  life  is  shown,  while  care  is  taken  to  avoid  technical 
terms  whenever  possible.  The  author's  chief  aim  is  to  give  such 
explicit  directions  as  will,  if  acted  upon,  help  the  reader  to  develop 
a  sound  mind  in  a  sound  body,  and,  at  the  same  time,  to  demonstrate 
in  a  simple  manner  why  each  rule  or  warning  is  given.  He  also 
shows  in  almost  every  chapter  the  effect  on  the  tissues  and  nervous 
system  of  a  misuse  of  alcoholic  drink  and  tobacco. 


NEW  AND  REVISED  EDITION. 

FOOD    AND    THE    PRINCIPLES    OF 
DIETETICS. 

By  ROBERT  HUTCHISON,  M.D.  EDIN.,  F.R.C.P., 

ASSISTANT  PHYSICIAN  TO  THE  LONDON  HOSPITAL  AND  TO  THE  HOSPITAL  FOR  SICK  CHILDREN, 

GREAT  ORMOND  STREET. 

Demy  8vo.     With  3  Plates  in  colour  and  numerous  Illustrations  in 
the  text.     1 6s.  net,  cloth ;  155.  net,  paper. 

This  important  work,  the  first  edition  of  which  was  described  by 
the  Guardian  as  '  one  of  the  most  enthralling  books  ever  published 
on  the  subject/  has  been  thoroughly  revised  by  the  author  in  the 
light  of  the  experience  of  recent  years,  and  is  now  absolutely  up  to 
date. 


Mr.  Edward  Arnold's  List  of  New  Books  5 

THE    AENEID    OF    VIRGIL. 

With  a  Translation  by  CHARLES  J.  BILLSON,  M.A., 

CORPUS  CHRISTI  COLLEGE,  OXFORD. 

2  vols.      Crown  $to.      308.    net. 

These  handsome  volumes,  which  are  printed  in  old-style  English 
type  on  a  deckle-edged  antique  paper,  and  are  bound  in  drab  holland 
with  paper  label  on  the  back,  contain  on  the  left-hand  page  a  text 
based  on  Conington's,  and  on  the  right  a  line-for-line  translation  in 
blank  verse. 

THE    ROMANCE    OF   EMPIRE. 

By  PHILIP  GIBBS, 

AUTHOR  OF  '  FACTS  AND  IDEAS,'  '  KNOWLEDGE  is  POWER,"  ETC. 

Crown  Svo.     With  Illustrations.     6s. 

In  this  book  Mr.  Gibbs  tells,  in  his  characteristically  interesting 
style,  the  story  of  the  expansion  of  Britain,  beginning  shortly  before 
the  time  of  Elizabeth,  and  bringing  the  account  down  almost  to  the 
present  day.  Each  great  division  of  our  Empire  beyond  the  seas  is 
dealt  with  in  turn,  and  without  any  sacrifice  of  historical  accuracy 
or  proportion  the  author  gives  to  his  narrative  the  attractiveness  of  a 
well-told  romance. 

SHAKESPEARE  AND  HIS  DAY. 

a  StuDB  of  tbe  tropical  Blement  in  Sbafceepeare  ant)  in  tbe 
;£lf3abetban  Drama. 

By  J.  A.  DE  ROTHSCHILD, 

TRINITY  COLLEGE,  CAMBRIDGE. 

Crown  Svo.     55.  net. 

This  work  was  originally  written  as  the  Harness  Prize  Essay  of 
1901.  The  author,  considering  that  no  field  could  offer  a  wealthier 
fund  of  Elizabethan  remains  than  the  contemporary  dramas,  has 
devoted  himself  almost  entirely  to  the  drama  as  a  source  of  infor- 
mation, although  contributions  have  occasionally  been  levied  on 
pamphlets  and  other  writings.  The  Elizabethan  background  which 
is  evolved  as  contemporary  allusions  are  massed  together  is  an 
achievement  equally  useful  and  interesting  to  the  lover  of  the 
literature  of  the  period. 


6  Mr.  Edward  Arnold's  List  of  New  Books 

VALVES    AND    VALVE    GEAR 
MECHANISMS. 

By  W.  E.  DALBY,  M.A.,  B.Sc.,  M.lNST.C.E.,  M.I.M.E., 

PROFESSOR  OF  ENGINEERING,  CITY  AND  GUILDS  OF  LONDON*  CENTRAL  TECHNICAL  COLLEGE. 

Royal  8vo.     With  numerous  Illustrations.     2 is.  net,  cloth  ; 
2os.  net,  paper. 

Valve  gears  are  considered  in  this  book  from  two  points  of  view, 
namely,  the  analysis  of  what  a  given  gear  can  do,  and  the  design  of 
a  gear  to  effect  a  stated  distribution  of  steam.  The  gears  analyzed 
are  for  the  most  part  those  belonging  to  existing  and  well-known 
types  of  engines,  and  include,  amongst  others,  a  link  motion  of  the 
Great  Eastern  Railway,  the  straight  link  motion  of  the  London  and 
North-Western  Railway,  the  Walschaert  gear  of  the  Northern  of 
France  Railway,  the  Joy  gear  of  the  Lancashire  and  Yorkshire 
Railway,  the  Sulzer  gear,  the  Meyer  gear,  etc.  A  chapter  is  added 
on  the  inertia  stresses  in  the  links  of  a  valve  gear,  and  an  actual 
example  of  the  inertia  loading  of  a  Joy  gear  is  fully  discussed. 


A    MANUAL    OF    PHARMACOLOGY. 

By  WALTER  E.  DIXON,  M.A.,  M.D.,  B.Sc.  LOND., 
D.P.H.  CAMB., 

ASSISTANT  TO  THE  DOWNING  PROFESSOR  OF  MEDICINE  IN  THE  UNIVERSITY  OF  CAMBRIDGE, 
EXAMINER  IN  PHARMACOLOGY  IN  THE  UNIVERSITIES  OF  CAMBRIDGE  AND  GLASGOW. 

Demy  Svo.     155.  net,  cloth;  145.  net,  paper. 

This  text-book,  which  is  prepared  especially  for  the  use  of  students, 
gives  a  concise  account  of  the  physiological  action  of  Pharmacopoeial 
drugs.  The  subject  is  treated  from  the  experimental  standpoint, 
and  the  drugs  are  classified  into  pharmacological  groups.  The  text 
is  fully  illustrated  by  original  tracings  of  actual  experiments  and  by 
diagrams. 

The  author's  aim  throughout  has  been  to  cultivate  the  reasoning 
faculties  of  the  student  and  to  subject  all  statements  to  experiment, 
in  the  hope  that  pharmacology  may  thus  be  learnt  like  any  other 
science,  and  consist  in  something  more  than  the  mere  committal  to 
memory  of  many  disjointed  and  often  unassociated  facts,  as  it  has 
been  too  often  in  the  past. 


Mr.  Edward  Arnold's  List  of  New  Books  7 

RACES   OF    DOMESTIC    POULTRY. 

By  EDWARD  BROWN,  F.L.S., 

SECRETARY  OF  THE  NATIONAL  POULTRY  ORGANIZATION  SOCIETY; 

AUTHOR  OF  'POULTRY  KEEPING:  AN  INDUSTRY  FOR   FARMERS  AND  COTTAGERS,'  'INDUSTRIAL 
POULTRY  KEEPING,'  '  PLEASURABLE  POULTRY  KEEPING,'  ETC. 

Crown  $0.     With  Illustrations.     6s.  net. 

This  important  and  comprehensive  work,  by  an  admitted  master 
of  his  subject,  will  be  welcomed  by  all  who  are  interested  in  poultry- 
keeping.  Chapters  I.  and  II.  deal  with  the  origin,  history,  and 
distribution  of  domestic  poultry,  and  with  the  evolution  and  classi- 
fication of  breeds ;  the  next  ten  chapters  are  devoted  to  the  various 
races  of  fowls  ;  Chapters  XIII.  to  XV.  treat  of  ducks,  geese,  and 
turkeys.  The  remaining  chapters  are  on  external  characters  and 
breeding.  There  are  also  Appendices  on  Nomenclature,  Judging,  etc. 


A    FISHING   CATECHISM 

AND 

A    SHOOTING    CATECHISM. 

By  COLONEL  R.  F.  MEYSEY-THOMPSON, 

AUTHOR  OF  '  REMINISCENCES  OF  THE  COURSE,  THE  CAMP,  AND  THE  CHASE.' 

Two  volumes.     Foolscap  8vo.     35.  6d.  net  each. 

Lovers  of  rod  and  gun  will  welcome  these  valuable  handbooks 
from  the  pen  of  an  admitted  expert.  The  information  given  is  abso- 
lutely practical,  and  is  conveyed,  for  the  most  part,  in  the  form  of 
Question  and  Answer.  As  the  result  of  some  fifty  years'  experience, 
the  author  seems  to  have  anticipated  every  possible  emergency,  and 
the  arrangement  is  especially  calculated  to  facilitate  easy  reference. 
There  are  special  chapters  on  fishing  and  shooting  etiquette,  and  at 
the  end  of  each  book  is  a  chapter  dealing  with  the  legal  side  of  the 
subject. 

4  The  questions  are  direct,  and  the  answers  equally  direct ;  it  is  difficult  to 
think  of  other  questions  which  might  have  been  put,  so  wide  is  the  range  covered 
by  query  and  reply;  and,  last  and  best  recommendation  of  all  for  a  book  of  this 
kind,  Colonel  Meysey-Thompson  recognises  that  no  question  must  be  ruled  out 
as  too  easy,  or  as  being  one  of  the  things  that  every  duffer  knows.' — County 
Gentleman. 

'  The  whole  handy,  well-printed  book  is  as  full  of  information  of  the  right 
sort  as  an  egg  is  of  meat.  It  will  delight  alike  the  tyro  and  the  expert,  which  no 
book  can  do  that  is  not  thoroughly  good.' — Sportsman. 


8  Mr.  Edward  Arnold's  List  of  New  Books 

RECENT  ADVANCES  IN  PHYSIOLOGY 
AND  BIO-CHEMISTRY. 

CONTRIBUTORS  '. 

BENJAMIN  MOORE,  M.A.,  D.Sc., 

JOHNSTON  PROFESSOR  OF  BIO-CHEMISTRY  IN  THE  UNIVERSITY  OF  LIVERPOOL. 

LEONARD  HILL,  M.B.,  F.R.S., 

LECTURER  ON  PHYSIOLOGY,  THE  LONDON  HOSPITAL. 

J.  J.  R.  MACLEOD,  M.B., 

PROFESSOR  OF  PHYSIOLOGY,  WESTERN  RESERVE  UNIVERSITY,  CLEVELAND,  U.S.A. 
LATE  DEMONSTRATOR  OF  PHYSIOLOGY,  THE  LONDON  HOSPITAL. 

M.  S.  PEMBREY,   M.A.,  M.D., 

LECTURER  ON  PHYSIOLOGY,  GUY'S  HOSPITAL. 

A.   P.   BEDDARD,   M.A.,  M.D., 

ASSISTANT  PHYSICIAN,  LATE  DEMONSTRATOR  OF  PHYSIOLOGY,  GUY'S  HOSPITAL. 

752  p&ges.     Demy  8vo.     iSs.  net,  cloth;  175.  net,  paper. 

This  book,  which  is  edited  by  Mr.  Leonard  Hill,  consists  of  Lec- 
tures on  Physiological  subjects  selected  for  their  direct  clinical 
interest,  and  designed  to  meet  the  requirements  of  advanced  students 
of  Physiology.  Professor  Moore  deals  with  Vital  Energy,  Ferments, 
and  Glandular  Mechanisms  ;  Mr.  Hill  himself  with  the  Atmosphere 
in  its  Relation  to  Life,  the  Metabolism  of  Water  and  Inorganic  Salts, 
and  the  Metabolism  of  Fat;  Professor  Macleod  with  the  Metabolism 
of  the  Carbohydrates,  and  of  Uric  Acid  and  the  other  Purin  Bodies, 
and  with  Haemolysis  ;  Dr.  Pembrey  with  the  Respiratory  Ex- 
change and  Internal  Secretion  ;  and  Dr.  Beddard  with  Lymph, 
Absorption,  and  the  Secretion  of  Urine. 


NEW  EDITION. 

PRACTICAL    PHYSIOLOGY. 

By  A.  P.  BEDDARD,  M.A.,  M.D.,  J.  S.  EDKINS,  M.A.,  M.B., 

L.  HILL,  M.B.,  F.R.S.,  J.  J.  R.  MACLEOD,  M.B.,  AND  M.  S. 

PEMBREY,  M.A.,  M.D. 

Demy  8vo.     Copiously  illustrated.     I2S.  6d.  net,  cloth  ; 
us.  6d.  net,  paper. 


Mr.  Edward  Arnold's  List  of  New  Books 

NEW    FICTION. 

Crown  8vo.     6s.  each. 


SECOND  IMPRESSION. 

THE  LADY  OF  THE  WELL. 

By  ELEANOR  ALEXANDER, 

AUTHOR  OF  'LADY  ANNE'S  WALK,'  'THE  RAMBLING  RECTOR.' 

HYACINTH. 

By  GEORGE  A.  BIRMINGHAM, 

AUTHOR  OF  'THE  SEETHING  POT.' 

FOLLY. 

By  EDITH  RICKERT, 

AUTHOR  OF  'THE  REAI-EK.' 

SECOND   IMPRESSION. 

THE  HOUSE  OF  SHADOWS. 

By  REGINALD  J.  FARRER, 

AUTHOR  OF  'THE  GARDEN  OF  ASIA.' 


THIRD    IMPRESSION. 

THE  PROFESSOR'S  LEGACY. 

By  MRS.  ALFRED  SIDGWICK, 

AUTHOR  OF  '  CYNTHIA'S  WAY,'  '  THE  BERYL  STONES,'  ETC. 

A  TROMBONE  AND  A  STAR. 

By  C.  T.  PODMORE, 

AUTHOR  OF  'A  CYNIC'S  CONSCIENCE.' 

A  FLOOD  TIDE. 

By  MARY  A.  DEBENHAM. 

THE  BROWN  HOUSE  and  CORDELIA. 

By  MARGARET  BOOTH. 


io  Mr.  Edward  Arnold's  List  of  New  Books 

THREE    LITTLE    COOKS. 

By  LUCY  CRUMP. 
Square  crown  Svo.     With  Illustrations  by  Gertrude  M.  Bradley.    25.  6d. 

1  No  child  who  owns  one  of  those  precious  possessions — a  miniature  cooking 
stove — should  be  without  this  book.  It  contains  many  good  recipes,  adapted  to 
the  conditions  of  a  toy  stove,  and  also  much  good  advice,  which  may  be  followed 
with  advantage  by  those  boys  and  girls  who  play  at  being  cooks.' — ChurchTimes. 


POLITICAL  CARICATURES,   1905. 

By  F.  CARRUTHERS  GOULD. 
Super  royal  4*0.     6s.  net. 


NEW  AND  CHEAPER  EDITIONS. 

THE  REMINISCENCES  OF  SIR 
HENRY   HAWKINS 

CfiSaron  ^Brampton). 
Edited  by  RICHARD  HARRIS,  K.C., 

AUTHOR  OF    'ILLUSTRATIONS    OF    ADVOCACY,"    'AULD    ACQUAINTANCE,'    ETC. 

Crown  Svo.     With  Portrait.     6s. 

In  this  edition  a  few  of  the  more  technically  legal  passages  have 
been  omitted,  but  all  the  dramatic  episodes  and  characteristic  anec- 
dotes remain  untouched. 


RED  POTTAGE. 

By  MARY  CHOLMONDELEY. 

Crown  Svo.     2s.  6d. 


Mr.  Edward  Arnold's  List  of  New  Books  n 

ESSAYS  AND  ADDRESSES  ON 
ECONOMIC    QUESTIONS    (1865-1893). 

WITH  INTRODUCTORY  NOTES  (1905). 

By   the    RIGHT    HON.    VISCOUNT   GOSCHEN. 

Demy  Svo.      155.  net. 

'  One  of  those  rare  and  desirable  works — an  economic  treatise  based  on 
practical  and  personal  experience,  and  at  the  same  time  interesting  and 
readable. ' — Manchester  Guardian. 

'  It  is  written  in  graphic  and  incisive  language.  Its  qualities  will,  we  are 
convinced,  appeal  to  many  readers  who  would  be  deterred  from  studying  more 
formal  and  elaborate  treatises,  for  they  will  find  here  complicated  facts  set  forth 
with  great  lucidity  and  directness.  .  .  .  They  will  feel  that  they  are  throughout 
in  close  contact  with  the  real  circumstances  of  the  actual  situation.'— -Economic 
Journal. 

FINAL  RECOLLECTIONS  OF  A 
DIPLOMATIST. 

By  the  RIGHT  HON.  SIR  HORACE  RUMBOLD,  BART., 
G.C.B.,  G.C.M.G., 

AUTHOR  OF  '  RECOLLECTIONS  OF  A  DIPLOMATIST  '  AND  '  FURTHER  RECOLLECTIONS 
OF  A  DIPLOMATIST.' 

Demy  Svo.     155.  net,  cloth  ;  145.  net,  paper. 

'  He  appears  to  have  met  and  known  every  remarkable  man  and  woman  of 
his  time  who  was  to  be  met  with  in  Europe.  This  last  volume  is,  indeed,  like  its 
predecessors,  a  thoroughly  fascinating  study.' — Daily  Chronicle. 


LORD    HOBHOUSE: 

A  MEMOIR. 

By  L.  T.  HOBHOUSE,  and  J.  L.  HAMMOND, 

AUTHOR  OF  'MIND  IN  EVOLUTION.'    AUTHOR  OF  'C.  J.  Fox:  A  STUDY.' 

Demy  Svo.     With  Portraits.     125.  6d.  net. 

'  No  more  conscientious  public  servant  than  the  late  Lord  Hobhouse  ever 
existed,  and  it  is  only  right  that  the  community  on  whose  behalf  he  spent 
laborious  days  should  be  able  to  appreciate  his  full  worth.  That  end  will  be 
agreeably  accomplished  by  the  readers  of  this  compact  and  eloquent  memoir. ' — 

A  tli  en  awn. 


12  Mr.  Edward  Arnold's  List  of  New  Books 

THE   LIFE   OF   JOHANNES   BRAHMS. 

By  FLORENCE  MAY. 

Two  volumes.     Demy  8vo.    With  Illustrations.     2 is.  net,  cloth; 
2os.  net,  paper. 

'  There  have  been  many  valuable  contributions  to  Brahms  literature,  but  none 
that  has  yet  appeared  is  of  equal  importance  with  Miss  May's  volumes.' — The 
Times. 

'  Quite  the  most  complete  and  comprehensive  life  of  the  master  which  has  so 
far  been  produced  in  this  country.' — Westminster  Gazette. 

'  Bids  fair  to  remain  for  many  years  to  come  the  standard  biography  in  the 
English  language.' — Yorkshire  Post. 


A  FORGOTTEN  JOHN  RUSSELL. 

Meim  Xetters  to  a  fl&an  ot  ^Business,  1724*1751. 

Arranged  by  MARY  EYRE  MATCHAM. 

Demy  8vo.     With  Portrait.     125.  6d.  net. 

1  A  vivacious  picture  of  society,  mainly  naval,  in  the  reign  of  the  second 
George.  John  Russell  appears  to  have  been  a  distant  connection  of  the  Bedford 
family.  .  .  .  Miss  Matcham  is  to  be  congratulated  on  her  judicious  editing  of 
this  fresh  and  pleasant  volume.  Her  John  Russell  has  been  most  tactfully  rescued 
from  oblivion.' — Athenaum. 


THEODORE  OF  STUDIUM  : 

HIS  LIFE  AND  TIMES. 

By  ALICE  GARDNER, 

ASSOCIATE  AND  LECTURER  OF  NEWNHAM  COLLEGE,  CAMBRIDGE  ; 

AUTHOR  OF  'JULIAN  THE  PHILOSOPHER,'  'STUDIES  IN  JOHN  THE  SCOT,'  'ROME  THE  MIDDLE 

OF  THE  WORLD,'  ETC. 

Demy  Svo.     With  Illustrations.     los.  6d.  net. 

Miss  Gardner  shows,  as  she  has  done  before,  a  fondness  for  the  byways  of 
ecclesiastical  history.  She  has  now  taken  as  the  subject  of  a  careful  study 
Theodore,  who  became  Abbot  of  the  Monastery  of  Studium,  in  Constantinople, 
towards  the  end  of  the  eighth  century.  .  .  .  The  author  writes  without  any 
ecclesiastical  bias  in  one  direction  or  the  other,  doing ^ full  justice  to  Theodore's 
nobler  qualities,  but  not  concealing  or  minimizing  his  faults.  The  volume  is 
illustrated  by  some  excellent  photographs.' — Glasgoiv  Herald. 


Mr.  Edward  Arnold's  List  of  New  Books  13 

THE  GREAT  PLATEAU. 

an  account  of  Exploration  in  Central  aibet,  1903,  anfc  of  tbe 

(Bartofc  Bjpemtfon,  1904=1905. 
By  CAPTAIN  C.  G.  RAWLING, 

SOMERSETSHIRE  LIGHT  INFANTRY. 

Demy  Svo.     With  Illustrations  and  Maps.     155.  net,  cloth; 
145.  net,  paper. 

'  Of  exceptional  value  as  a  record  of  travel,  and  its  interest  is  enhanced  by 
an  admirable  map  and  many  exceedingly  fine  illustrations.'—  Standard. 


IN    THE    DESERT. 

By  L.  MARCH  PHILLIPPS, 

AUTHOR  OF  '  WITH  RIMINGTON.' 

Demy  Svo.     With  Illustrations.     125.  6d.  net,  cloth; 
us.  6d.  net,  paper. 

1  A  very  fine  book,  of  great  interest  and  fascination,  that  is  difficult  to  lay  aside 
until  read  at  a  sitting.'— World. 

1  There  are  many  that  go  to  the  desert,  but  few  are  chosen.  Mr.  March 
Phillipps  is  one  of  the  few.  He  sees,  and  can  tell  us  what  he  has  seen,  and, 
reading  him,  we  look  through  his  eyes  and  his  sympathies  are  ours.'— The  Times'. 


TWO  YEARS  IN  THE  ANTARCTIC. 

a  Narrative  of  tbe  JSritfsb  National  Antarctic  BspeDttiom 
By  LIEUTENANT  ALBERT  B.  ARMITAGE,  R.N.R., 

SECOND  IN  COMMAND  OF  THE  'DISCOVERY,'  1901-1904;  AND  OF  THE  JACKSCN-HARMSWORTH 
POLAR  EXPEDITION,  1894-1897. 

Demy  Svo.      With  Illustrations  and  Map.     155.  net,  cloth  ; 
145.  net,  paper. 

•A  most  entertaining  work,  written  in  a  plain,  straightforward  style  which 
at  once  appeals  to  the  reader.  It  is  very  nicely  illustrated  and  furnished  with  an 
excellent  map.' — Field. 


1  6  Mr.  Edward  Arnold's  List  of  New  Books 

NEW  EDITION,  REVISED  AND  ENLARGED. 

COMMON-SENSE    COOKERY. 

ffot  Bnglfsb  Ibousebol&s,  witb  awentg  dftenus  worfcefc  out  in  2>etafU 


By  COLONEL  A.  KENNEY-HERBERT, 

AUTHOR  OF  '  FIFTY  BREAKFASTS,'  '  FIFTY  LUNCHES,'  '  FIFTY  DINNERS,"  ETC. 

Large  crown  Svo.     With  Illustrations.     6s.  net. 

The  author  has  so  largely  rewritten  this  edition  that  it  is  prac- 
tically a  new  book.  Besides  being  brought  up  to  date  with  the 
very  latest  ideas  on  the  subject,  it  is  much  enlarged,  and  now 
contains  a  number  of  attractive  full-page  illustrations. 


CHEAPER  EDITION. 

PEN  AND  PENCIL  SKETCHES  OF  SHIPPING  AND 
CRAFT  ALL  ROUND  THE  WORLD. 

By  R.  T.  PRITCHETT. 
Demy  Svo.     With  50  full-page  Illustrations.     35.  6d. 


ILLUSTRATED  EDITION. 

HISTORICAL   TALES    FROM 

SHAKESPEARE.  I 

By  A.  T.  QUILLER-COUCH  ('Q.'), 

AUTHOR  OF  'THE  SHIP  OF  STARS,'  ETC. 

Crown  Svo.     With  Illustrations  from  the  Boy  dell  Gallery.     6s. 

The  value  of  this  much-appreciated  work  will,  it  is  believed,  be 
enhanced  by  the  addition  of  sixteen  selected  illustrations  from  the 
well-known  Boydell  collection. 


LONDON  :  EDWARD  ARNOLD  41  &  43  MADDOX  STREET,  W, 


OF  THE 

UNIVERSI 

OF 


?x 

Y 


UNIVERSITY  OF  CALIFORNIA  LIBRARY 
This  book  is  DUE  on  the  last  date  stamped  below. 


NOV    3    1947 


,270et'59Mj 


JAN  I  5  19GG  G  8 
REC'D  LD 

JMI21'66-' 


LD  21-100m-12,'46(A2012sl6)4120 


1 400