Skip to main content

Full text of "Six temples at Thebes, 1896"

See other formats


I 


,^v   '> 


-?-.   - 


:r  Mj 


SIX  TEMPLES  AT  THEBES. 


1896. 


vJ 


BY 


W.   M.   FLINDERS   PETRIE,   D.C.L.,   LL.D.,   Ph.D., 

EDWARDS    PROFESSOR    OF     EGYPTOLOGY,     UNIVERSITY     COLLEGE,    LONDON  ; 

VICE-PRESIDENT  OF   THE   ROYAL   ARCHiEOLOGICAL   INSTITUTE,    LONDON; 

MEMBER   OF   THE   IMPERIAL   GERMAN   ARCH^OLOGICAL   INSTITUTE; 

CORRES.    MEMBER   SOCIETY   OF  ANTHROPOLOGY,    BERLIN  ; 

MEMBER  OF  THE   SOCIETY  OF   NORTHERN    ANTIQUARIES. 


WITH   A   CHAPTER  BY 

WILHELM    SPIEGELBERG,    Ph.D., 

OF   STRASSBURG  UNIVERSITY. 


.S. 


^y^^ 


A 


0' 


LONDON: 

BERNARD    QUARITCH,    15,    PICCADILLY,   W. 

1897. 


LONDON: 
PRINTED    BY  WILLIAM    CLOWES   AND    SONS,    Limitko, 

STAMFORD  STREET  AND  CHARING  CROSS. 


CONTENTS. 


INTRODUCTION. 

SECT. 

PAGE 

I.  The   produce   of  excava 

tions        .... 

I 

2.  Site  of  the  work    . 

I 

3.  The  workmen  . 

2 

4.  A  retrospect     . 

2 

5.  My  fellow-workers 

2 

CHAPTER  I. 
The  Chapel  of  Uazmes,  etc. 

6.  Excavation  in  the  chapel  3 

7.  Works    of  the   early 

XVIIIth  dynasty   .      .  3 

CHAPTER  II. 
The  Temple  of  Amenhotep  II. 

8.  History  of  the  site      .      .  4 

9.  Arrangement  of  temple    .  4 

10.  Foundation   deposits,  etc.  5 

11.  Stele  of  Duaui-er-neheh   .  5 

12.  Jar    of    26th     year,    and 

pottery 5 

13.  Building    by    Amenhotep 

III 6 

14.  Chapel  of  the  white  queen  6 

CHAPTER  III. 
The  Temple  of  Tahutmes  IV. 

15.  Condition  of  the  site  .      .  7 

16.  Forecourt  of  temple    .      .  7 

17.  Burial  of  workmen       .      .  7 


SECT.  PAGE 

18.  Plan  of  the  temple       .      .       8 

19.  Sculptures  found    ...       9 

CHAPTER  IV. 
The  Work  of  Amenhotep  III. 

20.  Destruction  of  his  temple       9 

21.  Avenue  of  jackals        .      .       9 

22.  Statues 10 

23.  Limestone  stele     .      .      .10 

24.  Black  granite  stele      .      .     10 

CHAPTER  V. 
The  Temple  of  Merenptah. 

25.  Foundations     .      .      .      .  11 

26.  Arrangement  of  temple    .  1 1 

27.  The  altars  in  temples        .  12 

28.  Brick  store  chambers  .      .  12 

29.  Black    granite    stele,   and 

statues 13 

CHAPTER  VI. 
The  Temple  of  Tausert. 

30.  Site  and  plan  ,      .      .      .      13 

31.  Foundation  deposits   .      .      14 

32.  Description  of  plates  XVI, 

XVII 14 

33.  Relation    of    Tausert    to 

Siptah 15 

CHAPTER  VII. 


The  Temple  of  Siptah. 

34.  Site  and  plan  .... 

35.  Foundation  deposits  . 


16 
16 


CHAPTER  VIII. 
Later  Objects  and  Plan. 


36.  Drawings 17 

37.  Tomb  of  Khonsuardus     .  18 

38.  Scarp  behind  Tausert       .  18 

39.  Helmet  and  tools  ...  18 

40.  Description  of  iron  tools   .  18 

41.  Relations  of  temples    ,      .  19 

CHAPTER  IX. 

The  Inscriptions. 

By  Dr.  W.  Spiegelberg. 

42.  Inscriptions  of  PI.  I     .      .     20 

43-  »  „        II  .      .     21 

44-  ,.  Pls.V,VIII     21 

45-  »  PI.  IX       .21 

46.  Limestone  stele  of  Amen- 

hotep III,  PI.  X      .      .     23 

47.  Granite  stele  of  Amenho- 

tep III,  Pis.  XI,  XII    .     23 

48.  Granite   stele   of    Meren- 

ptah, Pis.  XIII,  XIV  .     26 

49.  Stele    of  Duaui-er-neheh, 

Pi.  XV 28 

50.  Wine  jars,  etc.,  Pis.  XVI- 

XX 29 

51.  Note  on  Israel  stele    .      .     30 

CHAPTER  X. 

Shells  Used  by  the 
Egyptians. 


52.  List  of  shells 


30 


\ 


iv  CONTENTS. 


LIST  OF   PLATES. 


Platb.  page 

1.  Reliefs  of  XVIIIth  dynasty 3,  4,  9,  20 

2.  Statuettes  of  XVIIIth  dynasty 4,  S,  21 

3.  Foundation  deposits  and  small  objects,  XVIIIth  dynasty        .         .         .         .         .         S,  7,  9,  13,  21 

4.  Pottery  from  deposits,  early  XVIIIth  dynasty       .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .  3, 4,  5 

5.  Pottery  of  Amenhotep  II  and  III 5,21 

6.  Portraits  of  kings.     {PhotograpJi)  .  .  .  ,         .  .  .  .  .  .6, 9,  lo,  13,  17,22 

7.  Pottery  of  Tahutmes  IV 8 

8.  Steles  of  XVII  Ith-XXth  dynasty 6,9,17,18,21 

9.  Inscriptions  of  XVIIIth  dynasty,  etc.     .  .  .  .  .  .  ,  .  .         4,  6, 9,  2 1,  22 

la  Limestone  stele  of  Amenhotep  III  triumphing.     {Photograph)  .  .  .  .  .  .  10,  23 

11.  Black  granite  stele  of  Amenhotep  III.     {Photograph)      .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  10,  23 

12.  Inscription  of  same      ..............        23 

13.  Black  granite  stele  of  Merenptah.     (Photograph)     .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  13,  26 

14.  Inscription  of  same      ..............        26 

15.  Stele  of  Duaui-er-neheh.     {Photograph)  .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .    5,  28 

16.  Deposit  of  Tausert,  small  objects.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  14,  29 

17.  Deposit  of  Tausert  and  Siptah,  pottery  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  14,  15,  16,  17 

18.  Deposit  of  Siptah,  small  objects  .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .         ,         .         .  16,  29 

19.  Ostraka  of  Tausert  and  of  Siptah  ...........         29 

20.  Ostraka  from  Amenhotep  II  to  Merenptah  .         .         .         .  .         .  .         .         .         .    9,  29 

21.  Helmet,  bowl,  and  tools.     {Photograph)  .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .  18,  19 

22.  General  plan  of  temples       .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .        7,  13,  19 

23.  Plan  of  temples  of  Amenhotep  II  and  white  queen       ........  4 

24.  Plan  of  temple  of  Tahutmes  IV  ...........         .  7 

25.  Plan  of  temple  of  Merenptah        ............         11 

26.  Plans  of  temples  of  Uazmes,  Tausert,  Siptah,  and  Khonsuardus 3,  13  16,  18 


INTRODUCTION. 

I.  Repeatedly  ransacked  as  the  region  of  Thebes 
has  been  in  all  past  times,  there  yet  remain  a  few 
parts  which  have  been  little  examined,  if  at  all.  The 
cemetery  has  been  turned  over  and  over  by  every 
plunderer,  from  the  old  Egyptian  down  to  the  Coptic 
dealer  of  last  year ;  but  the  temple  sites,  from  their 
wide  extent  and  the  paucity  of  small  objects  to  be 
found  in  them,  have  been  but  little  searched.  It  was 
accordingly  on  these  temple  sites  that  we  spent  our 
work  in  1 896 ;  and  though  the  results  were  less  in 
some  ways  than  I  had  hoped,  yet  in  others  they  far 
exceeded  what  could  have  been  expected. 

On  looking  back  over  past  years  of  work,  the 
general  result  altogether  is  that  out  of  any  ten  great 
results  that  were  anticipated  and  worked  for,  only 
five  will  be  successfully  attained  ;  but  ten  other 
results  wholly  unexpected  will  be  found  in  the  course 
of  the  work.  Thus  if  on  the  one  hand  we  only  get 
half  of  what  we  expect,  on  the  other  hand  our  un- 
imagined  results  are  equal  to  all  that  we  looked  for. 
Another  general  conclusion  is  that  following  definite 
clues  produces  but  a  small  proportion  of  the  suc- 
cesses ;  much  more  than  half  of  the  discoveries  pro- 
ceed from  making  very  extensive  and  thorough 
clearances,  acres  in  extent,  and  yards  deep  to  the  very 
bottom,  on  ground  which  is  likely  to  contain  important 
material.  While  in  cemeteries,  only  one  tomb  in  ten 
repays  the  work ;  and  it  is  the  rare  one  tomb  in  a 
hundred  that  compensates  for  the  ninety  blanks  and 
nine  scanty  results. 

2.  The  region  of  the  work  was  about  half  a  mile 
long,  and  a  furlong  wide,  along  the  desert  edge  of  the 
western  shore  of  Thebes.  This  ground  reached  from 
behind  the  Kom  el  Hettan  to  near  the  temple  of 
Tahutmes  III.  When  I  went  there  in  December, 
1895,  the  temples  already  known  in  this  ground  were 
those  of  Tahutmes  IV,  and  Ramessu  II,  and  between 


them  the  chapel  of  Uazmes,  discovered  in  1887 ; 
while  the  ruins  behind  the  Kom  el  Hettan  were 
attributed  to  Amenhotep  III.  The  result  of  my 
work  was  to  fix  the  last-named  ruin  as  the  temple  of 
Merenptah,  and  to  discover  the  sites  of  the  temples  of 
Amenhotep  II,  Tausert,  and  Siptah ;  at  the  same 
time  the  sites  of  Tahutmes  IV  and  of  Uazmes  were 
fully  cleared  and  planned.  Meanwhile  Mr.  Quibell 
cleared  the  Ramesseum  and  the  great  buildings  around 
that,  working  for  the  Egyptian  Research  Account. 

To  excavate  in  this  place,  we  settled  in  the  brick 
galleries,  which  formed  the  store-chambers  and 
barracks  of  Ramessu  II  around  the  Ramesseum. 
Most  of  these  galleries  or  tunnels  have  fallen  in  during 
the  slow  decay  of  thirty  centuries,  but  some  of  them 
are  yet  complete  enough  to  give  all  the  shelter  that  is 
needed  in  such  a  climate.  We  picked  up  loose  bricks 
in  the  ruins,  and  built  dry  walls  to  divide  the  long 
space  into  rooms.  Each  gallery  is  about  thirteen  feet 
wide  and  high,  and  the  remaining  portions  are,  some 
of  them,  about  eighty  feet  long.  One  shorter  gallery 
served  for  my  room  and  store  for  antiquities  ;  the 
next,  which  was  a  long  one,  was  divided  up  for  Mr. 
and  Miss  Quibell,  two  spare  rooms  for  some  time 
occupied  by  Miss  Pirie  and  Miss  Paget  while  they 
were  copying  paintings,  our  dining-room  and  the 
kitchen  ;  the  next  gallery  contained  about  sixty 
workmen  and  boys,  with  very  often  half  a  dozen 
donkeys  and  an  occasional  camel ;  and  another  short 
gallery  served  for  my  best  man  Ali  and  his  family, 
and  the  mother  of  another  of  the  men.  We  thus 
formed  a  compact  community  in  what  was  almost  a 
fortification,  as  I  had  cleared  out  a  deep  trench 
around  the  dwellings  so  as  to  prevent  any  outsiders 
coming  about  the  place  or  getting  on  our  roof ;  while 
on  the  top  of  the  brick  arches  of  the  galleries  was  a 
wide  level  space,  which  served  for  spreading  things  in 
the  sun.  Very  soon  we  had  to  enclose  a  space  in 
front  of  the  galleries  to  hold  our  collections  of 
pottery,  pieces  of  sculpture,  and  stacks  of  ushabtis. 


INTRODUCTION. 


3.  At  first  I  brought  up  some  of  our  best  men  from 
Koptos,  and  took  on  many  of  the  Qurneh  people  for 
the  work.  But  as  soon  as  we  began  to  find  anti- 
quities, it  was  evident  that  the  previous  engagements 
of  these  local  workers  to  the  various  dealers  of  Thebes 
took  precedence  of  their  engagement  to  me.  Thus^ 
half  or  more  of  what  they  found  was  abstracted  for 
their  old  friends,  although  I  was  paying  them  so  well 
for  things  that  I  even  bought  back  from  dealers  part 
of  what  had  been  taken,  at  the  same  rate  that  I  paid 
the  workmen.  It  was  not  a  case  of  greater  gain  to 
them,  but  of  obliging  their  dealer  friends  with  stock 
for  trade.  This  system  was  quickly  defeated  by  dis- 
missing all  the  local  workers,  excepting  a  few  boys 
and  negroes,  and  bringing  in  a  far  larger  garrison 
from  Koptos,  while  also  drawing  many  from  the 
villages  around.  Thus,  for  two  months,  we  completely 
defeated  the  endless  machinations  of  the  Luxor  and 
Qurneh  dealers,  and  the  petty  terrorism  which  they 
tried  to  exercise.  So  long  as  I  had  Qurneh  men,  I 
heard  within  twenty-four  hours  of  what  was  stolen, 
through  reports  sent  to  me  from  Luxor  ;  so  soon  as  I 
dismissed  them,  I  never  heard  of  anything  else  going 
astray,  nor  had  my  good  and  honest  old  friend 
Muhammed  Mohassib  at  Luxor  any  knowledge  of  any- 
thing reaching  there.  So  for  the  first  time  excavations 
at  Thebes  were  carried  on  clear  of  the  incessant 
pilfering  and  loss  which  had  been  hitherto  supposed 
inevitable.  Nothing  short  of  a  good  garrison  of 
trained  workers  from  a  distance,  entrenched  upon  the 
work,  kept  in  hand  day  and  night  with  good  esprit  de 
corps,  prohibited  under  pain  of  dismissal  from  going 
to  the  villages  around,  or  from  buying  or  borrowing 
anything  from  the  neighbours,  together  with  continual 
watchfulness  and  a  free  use  of  fire-arms  at  night — 
nothing  short  of  this  will  suffice  for  excavations  at 
Thebes.  With  this  system  we  had  the  satisfaction  of 
digging  up  scarabs  and  other  good  things  a  few  inches 
below  where  the  enraged  Qurnawis  had  been  walking 
all  their  lives,  without  their  being  able  to  touch  a 
single  piece.  My  man  Ali  Suefi  was  even  more 
valuable  than  before,  as  he  was  not  only  proof  against 
all  the  blandishments  of  the  local  rascals — the  Abd  er 
Ra.suls  and  others — but  harassed  them  in  any  attempt 
to  get  at  the  other  workers,  and  saved  us  a  large  part 
of  our  results.  Of  course  I  put  him  on  to  all  the  best 
places,  and  he  got  about  half  of  ali  the  bakhshish  of 
the  season  as  his  reward.  When  you  have  an  honest 
man,  make  it  worth  his  while  to  continue  so. 

4.  The  whole  of  my   work   in   this   season   here 


described  was,  as  in  past  years,  carried  on  with  the 
assistance  of  my  constant  friends,  ,  Mr.  Jesse 
Haworth  and  Mr.  Martyn  Kennard.  After  nine 
years  of  this  association  a  change  has  come,  by  my 
working  for  the  Egypt  Exploration  Fund  ;  but  a 
change  which  leaves  much  regret  in  closing — at  least 
for  the  present — the  most  cordial  and  pleasant  rela- 
tions which  have  cheered  my  work  for  so  long  a  time. 
But  for  the  ready  help  of  these  friends  in  providing 
for  excavations,  to  whatever  extent  seemed  required, 
it  would  have  been  impossible  for  us  now  to  look  back 
on  the  portraits  of  Hawara,  which  restored  to  us  the 
Greco-Roman  art  of  painting ;  the  pyramids  of 
Amenemhat  IH,  and  Usertesen  II,  the  first  that 
were  shown  to  be  of  the  Xllth  dynasty  ;  the  towns 
of  Kahun  and  Gurob,  with  the  insight  into  the  Xllth 
and  XVIIIth  dynasties  that  they  gave  us  ;  the  Xllth 
dynasty  papyri,  and  the  Ptolemaic  papyri ;  the 
clearing  of  Medum,  which  fixed  the  pottery  and 
the  hieroglyphs  of  the  beginning  of  history ;  the 
painting  and  other  arts  of  the  naturalistic  age  of  Tell 
el  Amarna  ;  the  prehistoric  works  of  Koptos ;  the 
opening  of  an  entirely  new  position  by  the  history  of 
the  New  Race  at  Naqada ;  and  lastly,  the  Theban 
temples  and  the  great  stele  naming  the  Israelite  War. 
All  of  these  results  are  due  to  the  public  spirit  of  the 
two  friends  who  have  been  ever  ready  to  let  me  draw 
on  their  purses  for  such  work.  My  best  thanks,  and 
those  of  the  public  are  due  to  them,  for  thus  assisting 
in  filling  up  our  knowledge  of  ancient  Egypt.  How 
much  this  means  we  may  feel  by  just  trying  to 
imagine  what  our  views  would  now  be  without  this 
insight,  at  almost  every  age,  into  the  civilization  and 
works  of  that  country. 

5.  In  the  preparation  of  this  volume,  Dr.  Spiegel- 
berg  has  rendered  much  assistance  in  undertaking  the 
editing  of  the  inscriptions.  While  I  was  excavating, 
he  was  staying  at  Thebes  for  studying  the  graffiti  of 
the  Ramesside  age,  and  as  his  researches  lay  specially 
in  that  period,  it  seemed  most  fitting  that  he  should 
proceed  to  work  over  the  ostraka  and  other  hieratic 
inscriptions  that  I  found.  Subsequently  the  great  prize 
of  the  Israel  inscription — one  of  the  longest  and  most 
complete  that  is  known — was  brought  to  light ;  and 
Dr.  Spiegelberg  copied  it,  worked  over  my  squeeze 
of  it,  and  published  the  text  in  the  "  Zeitschrift."  His 
contribution  to  the  present  volume  will  show  how 
fully  he  has  laboured  at  the  material  which  we 
collected,  first  in  Egypt,  and  afterwards  in  England 
and  Germany.    The  drawings  here  given  are  my  own  ; 


THE  CHAPEL  OF   UAZMES,  AND  THE  EARLY  XVHITH   DYNASTY. 


and  for  the  photographs  reproduced,  I  have  to  thank 
Mr.  Frank  Haes  for  those  taken  in  England,  and 
Brugsch  Bey  for  those  of  the  steles  kept  at  the 
Ghizeh  Museum.  Continually  I  have  had  the  benefit 
of  Mr.  Quibell's  help,  both  in  finishing  my  affairs  in 
Egypt,  and  in  working  over  the  materials  brought 
away.  So  this  year,  as  before,  many  friends  make 
short  work. 

I  should  add  that  although  the  general  direction  of 
these  temples  is  facing  south-east,  yet  for  convenience 
they  are  assumed  to  face  east,  in  accord  with  the 
general  north  to  south  direction  of  the  Nile  Valley, 
and  all  directions  are  described  in  accord  with  the 
temples  facing  east  and  backing  west.  It  will  be 
noticed  that  the  plans  of  buildings  are  all  to  a  uniform 
scale,  so  that  they  can  be  compared  together. 


CHAPTER  I. 

THE  CHAPEL  OF   UAZMES,   AND  THE   EARLY 
XVniTH   DYNASTY. 

6.  This  chapel  or  small  temple  lies  immediately 
beyond  the  road  south  of  the  Ramesseum.  It  was 
discovered  and  cleared  out  by  M.  Daressy  in  1887  ; 
and  a  plan  of  it  was  published  as  PL.  IV  in  "  Le 
Musee  Egyptien,"  of  which  only  "Tom.  I,  Liv.  I, 
Fasc.  I "  ever  appeared,  so  that  the  promised  text 
which  was  to  come  in  Fascicule  II  has  not  been 
published.  As  this  exploration  bared  the  whole  site 
it  might  seem  needless  to  say  more  about  it ;  but  a 
small  further  excavation  gave  important  results. 

The  present  state  of  the  chapel  is  given  in  PL. 
XXVI,  where  the  solid  black  shows  the  remaining 
brick  walls,  the  open  outlines  at  the  doorways  show 
the  stonework,  and  the  open  outline  of  walls  show  what 
has  disappeared  since  the  uncovering  in  1887.  Several 
details  shown  on  the  earlier  plan  cannot  now  be  traced 
out ;  but  in  one  respect — the  skew  of  the  south  side 
of  the  forecourt — the  later  plan  is  the  more  accurate. 
This  skew  was  specially  noticed  as  affecting  the 
question  of  estimating  the  mean  axis  of  the  building. 

Some  few  matters  yet  waited  to  be  examined.  At 
A  the  sandstone  sill  of  the  entrance  pylon  remains 
in  place.  The  two  lines  crossing  it  show  where  the 
sides  of  the  doorway  stood.  On  tunnelling  beneath 
it  there  was  found  a  blue  glazed  ring  of  Amenhotep 
III  of  a  fine  colour  (PL.  Ill,  26).  From  the  position 
it  does  not  seem  at  all  likely  that  this  can  have  been 
introduced   after  the  building,  and   hence  we  must 


attribute  a  restoration  of  this  chapel  to  Amenhotep 
III.  What  his  object  was  in  thus  working  here  we 
may  guess  when  we  see  that  he  took  the  temple  of 
Amenhotep  II,  and  largely  altered  it  for  a  temple 
in  honour  of  the  Princess  Sitamen,  daughter  of 
Amenhotep  III.  Probably  therefore  he  made  a 
similar  re-appropriation  of  this  chapel  for  some 
divinity  or  for  some  other  princess  of  his  family.  At 
B,  at  the  head  of  the  low  steps  leading  to  the  court,  at 
28  inches  deep,  upon  the  gravel,  were  seventeen  little 
dumps  of  blue  glazed  pottery,  about  4-  inch  across. 
At  C  was  found  a  fine  green  scarab  of  Amenhotep  II 
(Pl.  Ill,  25)  apparently  beneath  the  brickwork  of  the 
door  sill.  And  at  D  were  three  more  blue  glazed 
dumps  and  a  flower,  rather  like  that  of  Merenptah's 
foundations  (PL.  Ill,  30).  Along  the  west  side  of 
the  building  is  a  thick  bed  of  rubbish  and  pottery, 
and  on  digging  through  part  of  that  a  piece  of  a  blue 
glazed  bowl  was  found  (Pl.  Ill,  27)  which  is  broken 
at  a  tantalising  point  after  the  title  of  the  "  Divine 
wife  of  Amen,"  so  that  the  name  is  just  lost.  The 
colour  and  drawing  of  this  piece  are  like  works  of 
Amenhotep  III,  but  very  different  to  the  earlier  style 
of  Hatshepsut.  So  this  again  shows  that  the  activities 
at  this  place  belong  to  the  later  date. 

On  looking  at  the  sculptures  found  here  in  1887, 
and  published  in  Pls.  I,  II,  III,  V,  VI,  of  "  Le  Musee 
Egyptien,"  about  half  of  them  belong  to  the  earlier 
age,  down  to  Tahutmes  III  (Pls.  I,  II,  V  A,  VI  B,  D)  ; 
while  others  are  of  the  later  part  of  the  XVIII  dynasty 
(III,  VI  C)  and  probably  early  XIX  dynasty  (V  B,  C  ; 
VI  a).  The  official  of  the  cemetery  Pa-shed  who 
adores  Uazmes  on  the  stele  of  Pl.  Ill  is  very  probably 
the  same  as  the  cemetery  official  Pa-shed  of  the 
Belmore  altar  No.  8,  and  the  tablets  261,  262,  264, 
282,  341  of  the  British  Museum.  (The  numbers  here 
given  are  those  in  the  Synopsis  of  1850,  the  only 
available  list  of  that  Museum).  It  seems  therefore 
that  this  chapel  was  in  use  for  the  adoration  of 
Uazmes,  and  perhaps  of  other  persons,  down  to  the 
XlXth  dynasty ;  and  that  it  was  largely  restored 
under  Amenhotep  III. 


7.  Some  other  remains  of  the  early  part  of  the 
XVIIIth  dynasty  were  found  in  various  sites :  we 
here  notice  them  in  the  order  of  the  drawings. 

In  the  temple  of  Tahutmes  IV  blocks  of  earlier 
sculpture  had  been  freely  used  up :  some  of  these 
appear  to  have  been  from  tombs,  as  they  bear  figures 
of  servants  (PL.  I,  i,  2).     The  date  is  shown  by  the 

B  2 


THE  TEMPLE   OF  AMENHOTEP  II. 


cartouche  of  Tahutmes  I  and  the  name  Aa-kheper- 
ka-ra-senb.  These  slabs  are  of  coaise  brown  sandstone 
painted  in  body  colour,  without  any  sculpturing. 

A  tablet  (PL.  I,  3)  of  limestone  shows  a  woman 
named  Bakt,  making  a  meat  offering  and  a  drink 
offering  to  the  cow  of  Hahtor,  for  the  benefit  of  her 
husband,  the  engraver  of  Amen,  named  Amenemhat. 
The  three  hollows  at  the  top  are  apparently  for  two 
ears,  and  perhaps  the  sign  of  a  hide ;  it  seems  as  if 
some  inlaid  objects  had  been  inserted,  of  glass  or 
metal. 

A  portion  of  an  altar  (PL.  I,  4)  of  sandstone 
dedicated  by  a  chief  priest  of  Tahutmes  III  named 
Ra,  was  found  in  the  temple  ruins  of  Amenhotep  II. 
This  priest  was  the  husband  of  the  nurse  of  Amen- 
hotep II,  and  his  tomb  is  one  of  the  finest  in  Qurneh, 
published  partly  in  Lepsius  "Denkmaler"  III,  62, 
and  Prisse  "Art,"  where  the  glass  and  stone  vases 
are  figured. 

A  large  wooden  ushabti  (PL.  II,  i)  was  found  in 
a  high  heap  of  ashes  upon  the  top  of  the  brick 
galleries  behind  the  Ramesseum :  how  it  can  have 
come  into  such  a  position  cannot  be  traced.  It 
belonged  to  the  tomb  of  the  great  viceroy  of  the 
Sudan  under  Tahutmes  III,  named  Nehi ;  he  built 
the  temple  in  the  island  of  Sai,  and  carved  the 
S.  grotto  of  Ibrim.  The  work  of  this  ushabti  shows 
the  taste  of  that  time  in  the  slender,  delicately  carved, 
and  finely  formed  hieroglyphs. 

A  limestone  Osiride  figure  (PL.  II,  2)  of  Tahutmes  I 
was  found  in  the  ruins  of  the  temple  of  Amenhotep 
II ;  the  work  however  seems  to  belong  to  the  time  of 
the  earlier  king,  and  it  seems  as  if  it  might  well  have 
been  brought  from  his  tomb,  and  be  an  early  type  of 
royal  ushabti. 

Behind  the  temenos  of  the  temple  of  Mercnptah, 
we  found  at  the  base  of  the  wall  a  patch  of  sand  with 
small  vases  (PL.  IV,  1-8)  of  rough  pottery ;  and  it 
appears  that  these  belonged  to  the  foundation  deposit 
of  some  earlier  building,  which  was  cleared  away  by 
Merenptah.  These  seem  on  the  whole  to  be  rather 
earlier  in  type  than  the  vases  of  Amenhotep  II, 
figured  next  below  them :  but  no  positive  date  can 
be  assigned  to  them. 

On  clearing  a  building  in  the  outer  court  of 
Tahutmes  IV,  a  part  of  an  earlier  stele  was  found 
used  up  in  the  threshold  (PL.  IX,  i).  It  represents 
a  man  named  Min-mes,  making  offerings  to  his  father 
Athu-usir ;  and  from  the  work  it  is  probably  of  about 
the  reign  of  Tahutmes  III. 
These  comprise  all  the  remains  earlier  than  Amen- 


hotep II  which  were  found  in  the  course  of  the 
excavations.  The  later  remains  we  shall  notice  in 
dealing  with  the  temples  of  their  respective  periods  in 
the  following  chapters. 


CHAPTER  II. 

THE  TEMPLE  OF  AMENHOTEP  IL 

8.  To  the  north  of  the  Ramesseum  was  a  space  of 
ground  covered  with  chips  of  stone,  and  with  a  few 
brick  walls  .showing  upon  it  When  examined  this 
proved  to  be  a  confused  mass  of  structures  of  four 
different  ages.  First  of  all  there  had  been  some 
brick  buildings,  askew  to  the  later  plan  ;  these  had 
traces  of  colour  on  them,  and  were  probably  chapels 
of  some  tombs.  A  piece  of  this  wall  is  shown  on  the 
north  side  of  the  plan,  Pl.  XXIII,  at  A.  The  next 
building  was  the  temple  of  Amenhotep  II;  and  the 
occurrence  of  his  name  here  cannot  be  due  merely  to 
his  materials  being  brought  from  some  other  site  at  a 
later  date,  as  five  foundation  deposits  of  his  were  found 
quite  undisturbed  in  the  rock. 

Next  Amenhotep  III  largely  altered  this  temple. 
Sculptured  blocks  of  Amenhotep  II  are  found  re-used, 
buried  in  the  foundations  of  the  colonnade  of  the 
portico ;  this  re-use  was  before  Amenhotep  IV,  as 
the  name  of  Amen  is  not  erased  upon  them,  while  it 
is  erased  on  all  the  sculptures  left  above  ground. 
Thus  we  are  limited  to  Tahutmes  IV  or  Amenhotep 
III  in  our  ascription  of  the  rebuilding;  and  it  is 
fixed  to  the  latter  king  by  the  many  pieces  of  glazed 
pottery  tubes,  from  some  furniture,  bearing  his  name. 
Probably  to  this  time,  or  a  little  laterj  belong  the 
many  pieces  of  limestone  with  trial  sculptures  of  some 
students,  who  seem  to  have  used  the  temple  as  a 
school. 

The  last  use  of  this  site  was  for  tombs  of  about  the 
XXIInd  dynasty.  The  walls  of  these  are  shown  by 
mottled  black  and  white  on  the  plan.  Within  the 
enclosures  were  three  tomb  pits,  marked  here  by 
diagonal  lines.     So  much  for  the  history  of  the  site. 

9.  Turning  now  to  the  details  of  the  te  .ipic  of 
Amenhotep  II,  the  only  parts  that  we  can  be  certain 
are  original  are  the  bases  of  the  columns  (as  the 
deposits  are  undisturbed  beneath  them),  and  the  stone 
foundations  of  walls  which  are  built  like  the  bases. 
The  court  was  not  so  large  as  that  of  Tahutmes  IV, 
and  had  only  a  single  line  of  columns  around  it,  the 
whole  being  about  140  feet  wide,  and  120  feet  long. 


THE  TEMPLE  OF  AMENHOTEP  II. 


The  position  of  the  back  wall  is  shown  by  the  great 
door  sill  B.  At  C  was  the  grey  granite  statue  of 
Amenhotep  II,  swathed  in  osiride  manner,  and  holding 
the  crook  and  flail — a  type  unusual  in  a  seated  statue 
such  as  this.  The  head  was  broken  off,  and  could  not 
be  found  anywhere  in  the  whole  site.  From  the 
position  it  seems  that  the  statue  was  one  of  a  pair  on 
either  side  of  the  entrance  to  the  temple  beyond  the 
court.  Such  was  also  the  position  of  the  statues  of 
Ramessu  and  of  Merenptah  in  their  temples.  Beyond 
this  there  are  fragments  of  foundations  left,  but  not 
enough  to  indicate  a  plan.  The  proportion  of  the 
front  court  to  the  length  of  the  site  behind  it  is  more 
like  that  of  Tahutmes  IV  than  like  the  longer  temples 
of  the  XI  Xth  dynasty. 

10.  The  foundation  deposits  were  of  two  classes. 
There  were  the  usual  pits  in  the  rock,  containing 
rough  alabaster  vases,  inscribed  in  ink  with  the 
cartouche  (PL.  Ill,  5),  corn  grinders  (III,  i)  of  sand- 
stone, oval  pieces  of  alabaster  (III,  2,  3,  4),  copper 
models  of  adzes  (III,  6),  chisels  (III,  8,  9),  axes  (7), 
and  knives  (10)  ;  with  these  were  a  large  quantity  of 
rough  pottery  vases  (IV,  9-29).  These  deposits  are 
marked  D  in  the  plan,  and  it  is  remarkable  how  they 
are  scattered  about  the  site,  and  not  in  the  usual 
positions  ;  the  three  under  the  line  of  column  bases 
are  strangely  close  together.  The  other  class  of 
deposits  were  the  small  limestone  tablets  with  the 
cartouches  (III,  11,  12)  ;  these  were  found  in  pairs, 
face  to  face,  on  the  ground  surface  under  the  ruins. 

Of  miscellaneous  objects  found  here  were  some 
bronze  rosettes,  gilt,  and  pierced  with  holes  for  sewing 
on  to  a  garment  (III,  17).  Many  pieces  of  finely- 
carved  statuettes  of  wood  were  scattered  about,  and  a 
headless  kneeling  figure  of  alabaster  (II,  3),  probably 
of  Amenhotep  II,  as  other  figures  in  this  attitude  are 
known  of  him  at  Paris,  Berlin,  and  Turin,  and  are 
drawn  in  a  tomb  at  Qurneh.  The  portion  of  an 
osiride  statuette  of  Tahutmes  I  (II,  2)  is  most 
unexpected  in  such  a  position  ;  it  seems  more  likely 
to  have  come  from  his  temple  or  tomb. 

11.  The  broken  altar  of  Ra,  high  priest  of 
Tahutmes  III  (I,  4),  was  found  in  the  ruins  (see 
"History"  II,  162,  163),  as  also  the  large  unfinished 
stele  of  Duaui-er-neheh,  reproduced  in  photograph 
Pl.  XV.  This  man  cannot  be  the  same  as  Duaui- 
neheh  of  Qurneh,  tomb  22  (in  Champollion,  Notices,  I, 
515,  844),  whose  mother  was  Tarounet  ("  the  virgin  "), 
as  this  man's  mother  was  Mesut.  But  as  both  men 
have  the  same  hereditary  titles,  and  each  has  a  brother, 
a  uab  priest,  named  Neb-mes,  it  seems  likely  that  this 


man  was  grandson  of  the  owner  of  the  Qurneh  tomb, 
son  he  cannot  be,  as  his  father  was  Benaa.  We 
might  therefore  restore  the  family  thus : — 


;r=Tarounet 


Erpa-ha,  Ifai-sahufl     t-»        •' 
c«,i^.«„   A.,  1    Duauii 


smer-tMf  &'c. 


neheh        [/aS  Neb-mes 

Benaa^Mesut 
I 


£ria-/ui,iat-saiut       Uai        User-aah    Ra    Nefert    Sen-    Ruti    Nefer-  Anni    Aahmes 
Uuaui-er-neheh       Neb-mes  senb  reupit 


This  would  agree  well  in  date.  The  Qurneh  tomb 
bears  the  names  of  Hatshepsut  and  Tahutmes  III, 
about  1500  or  1490  B.C.;  and  this  tablet  was  left 
unfinished  and  used  in  the  building  of  Amenhotep  II, 
about  1440  B.C.,  thus  leaving  50  or  60  years  between 
the  two  for  the  two  generations  that  elapsed.  The 
main  interest  of  the  stele  is  its  unfinished  condition. 
The  position  of  all  the  figures  and  signs  has  been  first 
sketched  in  red  ;  then  the  final  outlines  have  been 
drawn  in  delicate  black  line  over  all  the  figures  and 
the  inscription  at  the  top,  the  names  of  the  brothers 
and  the  first  line  of  lower  inscription  being  in  solid 
black.  Lastly  a  beginning  of  cutting  has  been  made 
between  the  seated  figures,  just  to  show  which  part 
was  to  be  sunk.  The  mode  of  writing  the  hieroglyphs 
is  instructive,  as  a  lesson  in  such  writing,  apart  from 
hieratic  forms.  The  exact  formation  of  the  strokes 
has  been  carefully  copied  and  published  by  Miss 
Murray,  in  'Proc.  Soc.  Bib.  Arch.,'  xix.  yj.  The 
discussion  of  the  inscription  is  given  in  Dr.  Spiegel- 
berg's  chapter  here.  The  stele  is  now  at  University 
College,  London. 

12.  Beside  the  pottery  in  the  foundation  deposits 
(IV  9-29),  there  were  also  found  some  jars  lying  in 
the  ruins.  One  of  these  is  of  great  value  historically 
(V,  3),  as  it  bears  the  name  of  Amenhotep  II  (V,  5), 
and  a  date  of  the  twenty-sixth  year  (V,  6),  with  the 
name  of  the  vine-dresser,  Panehsi  'the  negro,'  who 
stored  the  wine.  Hitherto  no  date  of  this  king 
above  the  fifth  year  had  been  known,  and  the  assign- 
ment of  25  years  10  months  to  this  reign  by  Manetho 
was  generally  discredited.  The  latest  writer,  Maspero, 
asserts  that  the  "  reign  was  a  short  one,  lasting  ten 
years  at  most,"  ("  Struggle  of  the  Nations,"  292).  Yet 
from  the  generations  in  the  royal  genealogies,  and  the 
finishing  of  the  Lateran  obelisk  after  35  years  of 
abandonment,  it  seemed  that  Manetho's  period  must 
be  correct  ("  History"  ii.  153).  Now  there  is  absolute 
evidence  for  the  whole  length  of  reign  named  by 
Manetho,  in  this  date  of  the  26th  year,  and  we  have 
a  wholesome  warning  against  rejecting  his  statements, 
except  under  the  strongest  pressure.     Some  other  jars 


THE  TEMPLE  OF  AMENHOTEP  11. 


were  also  found,  the  style  of  which  agrees  well  with 
what  we  know  of  this  period  otherwise  (V,  I,  2,  4). 
In  the  space  to  the  north  of  the  line  of  approach, 
close  to  the  east  of  the  portico,  was  an  extensive 
levelling  up  of  the  ground  with  broken  pottery. 
Among  this  pottery  were  many  painted  pieces,  of 
which  some  are  shown  on  PL.  V,  7-12.  The  shading 
on  these  is  upright  for  red,  and  horizontal  for  blue. 
The  date  of  this  filling  up  of  the  ground  is  not  certain, 
for  though  it  would  seem  probable  that  Amenhotep  II 
would  have  required  to  level  the  ground,  yet  the  bases 
of  the  columns  here  were  all  built  by  Amenhotep  III 
from  the  ground  upward  for  four  courses.  Hence  it 
would  be  more  likely  that  the  material  piled  against 
the  retaining  wall  of  these  foundations  would  also 
belong  to  the  later  king.  The  presence  of  much  blue 
colouring  on  the  pottery  is  in  accord  with  this,  for — 
.so  far  as  is  yet  known — this  use  of  blue  was  introduced 
by  Amenhotep  III.  A  curious  kind  of  pottery,  not 
known  otherwise,  is  incised  with  lines  and  spots, 
coloured  white  in  alternate  sections,  and  dabbed  with 
white  on  the  brown  clay  (III,  13). 

13.  The  work  of  Amenhotep  III  on  this  site 
appears  to  have  been  an  extensive  remodelling.  The 
whole  of  the  portico  was  entirely  built  by  him,  as  the 
foundation  piers  of  the  columns  consist  of  pieces  of 
sculpture  of  Amenhotep  II,  including  a  long  lintel  of 
sandstone  broken  in  two.  The  sculptures  in  the 
temple  were  also  due  to  him,  for  among  the  fragments 
is  a  relief  of  a  princess,  whose  cartouche  ends  in  si 
(VI.  6),  which  cannot  be  any  known  person  but 
Sitamen,  daughter  of  Amenhotep  III.  Another  block 
bore  the  figures  of  a  row  of  Libyans,  and  the  work 
appears  much  more  like  that  of  the  Ilird  than  of  the 
llnd  Amenhotep.  Many  glazed  tubes  of  pottery 
were  found  (III,  14,  15,  16,  18,  19,  20),  coloured  light 
blue,  dark  violet,  and  yellow,  with  inlays  of  dark  blue 
and  light  green.  These  all  bear  the  name  of  Amen- 
hotep III,  and  refer  to  the  festivals  in  which  they 
were  probably  dedicated  as  part  of  some  furniture. 
A  beautiful  bust  from  a  small  group  in  limestone, 
which  was  found  here,  appears  from  the  hair  to  belong 
also  to  this  age.  A  kneeling  figure  in  grey  syenite 
bears  a  tablet  with  adoration  by  a  royal  scribe,  Sesh 
(VIII,  4),  but  as  the  head  is  lost,  the  reign  cannot  be 
assigned.  In  this  region  was  also  found  a  seal  carved 
in  pottery  under  Akhenaten,  with  the  inscription 
"Aten  temple"  (III,  24). 

The  last  use  of  this  site  was  for  a  tomb  chapel  of 
about  the  XXIIIrd  dynasty.  The  walls  are  shown 
in   mottled  black    and  white,  and  three  tomb   pits 


marked  by  diagonal  lines.  These  pits  were  cleared 
out,  but  contained  only  very  poor  beads,  and  a  bronze 
statue  of  a  queen  about  eight  inches  high  ;  this  figure 
is  apparently  nude,  with  a  circular  crown,  a  short 
close  wig  (like  the  statue  of  Takushet  in  Athens),  and 
wide  flat  sandals.  Other  figures  of  the  same  class  are 
known.  Some  work  was  done  here  in  Greek  times, 
as  a  vase  of  Saitic  period  was  found  by  the  wall  of 
this  chapel,  and  with  it  an  iron  chisel  and  adze. 


14.  Behind  the  temple  of  Amenhotep  II,  toward 
the  Ramesseum,  stood  another  funerary  chapel, 
which  is  shown  on  the  plan  PL.  XXIII.  The  only 
object  found  in  it  is  a  bust  of  a  queen  in  hard  white 
limestone  (VI,  2,  3),  and  hence  this  is  called  the 
White  Queen's  chapel.  Unfortunately  the  name  is 
lost,  and  only  some  priestly  titles  remain  on  the  back 
of  the  bust  (IX,  2).  The  date  is  quite  unfixed  ;  there 
is  no  very  close  parallel  to  the  work,  and  only  general 
considerations  are  available.  Some  points  would  lead 
to  an  early  period,  the  locality  just  behind  the  temple 
of  Amenhotep  II  and  III,  the  hard  white  limestone 
just  like  that  used  by  Amenhotep  III,  and  the 
rosette  on  the  breast,  which  is  like  that  on  the  statue 
of  Tua,  wife  of  Sety  I,  in  the  Villa  Verospi  (Monu- 
menti  Inediti  dall'  Instituto,  ii,  40).  Dr.  Spiegelberg 
remarks  that  he  would  place  it  to  the  XlXth  dynasty, 
and  calls  attention  to  the  wrinkle  in  the  neck,  which, 
so  far  as  he  has  observed,  is  a  peculiarity  of  the  artist 
of  the  time  of  Sety  I,  and  Ramessu  II. 

The  double  uraeus  on  the  head  is  not  decisive,  as 
it  occurs  on  Queen  Tyi  at  Soleb,  and  on  a  later  statue 
(of  XXV  dyn.  ?)  at  Berlin  ;  while  a  triple  uraeus  is 
on  the  head  of  Amenardus.  The  ear  stud  belongs 
equally  to  the  XVIIIth  and  XXVth  dynasties.  But 
other  points  indicate  a  later  date,  of  about  the  XXVth 
or  XXVIth  dynasties.  The  mention  of  Sais  on  the 
back  would  point  to  the  XXVIth  dynasty ;  though 
concentration  of  so  many  priesthoods  into  the  queen's 
hands  points  also  to  the  priestly  character  of  the  high 
priestesses  of  Amen.  And  the  elaborate  treatment 
of  the  hair  seems  quite  as  late  as  the  XXVIth 
dynasty,  and  almost  more  like  Ptolemaic  work.  On 
the  whole  I  should  be  inclined  to  see  in  this  one  of 
the  queens  of  the  XXVIth  dynasty,  who  held  Thebes 
as  being  a  ruler  of  the  sacerdotal  line. 

The  bust  was  found  lying  in  the  northern  long 
chamber ;  it  is  now  in  the  Cairo  Museum.  A  few 
small  fragments  of  coloured  stucco  were  also  found, 
but  nothing  distinct   as   to  date ;   one  piece   reads, 


/ 


THE  TEMPLE  OF   TAHUTMES   IV. 


"kan  mes  suten  kemt."     If  this  should  be  read  as 

" ka  .  n  born  of  the  royal  wife,"  there  is  only 

one  known  person  to  whom  it  could  refer,  namely, 
Psamtek  III.  Ka  .  ankh  .  ka  .  n  born  of  the  royal 
wife  Tentkheta.  The  difficulty  in  this,  however,  is 
that  there  is  no  determination  after  the  .  .  .  .  ka  .  n, 
and,  moreover,  this  being  the  throne  name  of  Psamtek, 
it  could  only  occur  after  he  was  king,  and  yet  the 
.  .  .  ka  .  n  .  is  not  in  a  cartouche.  It  more  likely 
refers  then  to  some  unknown  prince,  if  it  is  a  personal 
name  at  all.  The  whole  chapel  is  much  denuded. 
Of  the  north  wall  hardly  anything  remains  above  the 
floor,  and  it  is  only  visible  as  being  above  the  ground 
outside  of  it.  The  central  chamber  is  about  three  or 
four  feet  high.  But  the  back  wall  is  entirely  gone, 
and  is  here  only  restored  at  a  guess. 


CHAPTER  III. 
THE   TEMPLE   OF   TAHUTMES  IV. 

15.  The  site  of  this  temple  was  on  a  slight  spur  of 
the  desert  edge  next  south  of  the  chapel  of  Uazmes 
and  the  Ramesseum  (see  PL.  XXII).  When  we 
began  work  there  was  an  area  of  about  two  hundred 
feet  across,  strewn  with  chips  of  sandstone  and  dust, 
while  east  of  it,  lower  down  at  the  edge  of  the 
cultivated  land,  were  the  worn  down  bases  of 
brick  walls  and  pylons.  The  site  has  been  identified 
by  Lepsius  as  belonging  to  Tahutmes  IV.,  from  the 
cartouches  stamped  on  the  bricks,  and  the  pylons  are 
marked  on  the  map  in  the  Denkmaler.  But  no  attempt 
to  clear  the  temple  site  had  yet  been  undertaken. 

On  Pl.  XXIV  will  be  seen  the  plan  of  all  the 
existing  remains.  In  some  parts  the  sandstone 
foundations  of  the  walls  and  bases  of  the  columns 
were  still  in  place.  In  far  the  larger  part  of  the 
building  only  the  hollows  in  the  rock  cut  for  laying 
the  foundations  could  be  traced ;  or,  still  worse,  only 
the  hollow  left  by  abstracting  the  stone  from  its  bed 
in  the  midst  of  clean  rubble-filling,  the  hollow  being 
filled  with  stray  rubbish.  In  these  parts  then  it  was 
needful  to  notice  the  difference  between  old  rubble 
and  later  rubbish  as  the  work  went  on.  A  few  pieces 
of  original  outer  surface  were  left  ;  as  the  granite 
door  sill  of  the  peristyle  court,  marked  G,  two  patches 
of  pavement  in  the  inner  part,  marked  P,  .nd  one 
block  of  wall  base  with  faces  to  it  at  the  S.  L.  corner 
of  the  court,  marked  B.  '  iie  brick  wallinj  could  be 
traced    around    most    of    lie    site,    thougu    entirely 


removed  and  denuded  at  the  S.E.  corner  and  along 
the  N.  side. 

16.  Beginning  with  the  entrance  (see  PL.  XXIV), 
at  the  east  face  there  are  parts  of  two  massive 
pylons,  about  28  feet  thick,  which  in  a  rounded  state 
are  still  about  10  feet  high.  The  outer  corners  of  the 
terraces  in  front  are  almost  entirely  gone,  but  the  bricks 
can  still  be  seen  in  the  ground  of  the  present  road, 
which  runs  just  inside  the  outer  pylons.  Near  the 
north-west  corner  of  the  temenos  are  some  brick  build- 
ings which  are  probably  of  Tahutmes  IV,  or  Amen- 
hotep  III,  judging  by  the  pottery  found  in  them. 

Beyond  this  the  rock  is  cut  away  in  two  hollows,  one 
on  either  side  of  the  axis,  so  as  to  make  a  level  court, 
bounded  by  a  rock  face  on  the  western  side.  The 
axial  roadway  was  dressed  in  a  slope  which  ran  up  to 
the  top  of  the  court  and  so  led  to  the  next  terrace ; 
the  arrangement  being  much  like  that  of  Deir  el 
Bahri.  On  the  next  terrace  was  a  lesser  pylon  of 
brickwork,  about  68  feet  (40  cubits)  wide  on  either 
side,  and  18  feet  thick.  Behind  this  was  another 
court,  levelled  by  being  partly  cut  into  the  rock,  so 
that  it  was  bounded  on  the  west  by  a  rock  face,  the 
breadth  of  the  latter  of  which  is  marked  and  shaded 
with  vertical  shade  lines.  The  rock  on  this  western 
side  was  faced  over  with  a  brick  wall,  and  a  stone 
facing  in  front  of  that  on  the  southern  half  This 
stone  face  is  in  line  with  the  brick  face  of  the  northern 
half,  which  therefore  seems  not  to  have  any  stone 
face  ;  if  so,  it  was  probably  finished  off  last  of  all,  and 
time  saved  by  putting  only  brickwork  on  the  north, 
to  match  the  stone  face  on  the  south. 

At  the  north  end  of  this  court  the  ground  is  higher, 
and  is  occupied  with  a  group  of  buildings,  which  were 
divided  into  two  parts,  one  of  five  rooms  and  a  stair- 
way, the  other  of  eight  rooms.  The  only  object  found 
here  was  a  rudely-cut  stamp  of  limestone  for  seaUng 
wine  jars  (PL.  Ill,  23). 

17.  In  the  south-west  chamber  of  this  building  the 
floor  was  found  to  rest  upon  made  earth,  and  not  on 
the  rock.  On  digging  down  here  a  rock  scarp  was 
found  facing  the  east,  the  slope  of  it  being  marked  on 
the  plan  by  vertical  shade  lines.  Below  this  scarp  an 
entrance  was  found,  leading  into  a  passage  running 
west :  at  the  end  of  this  passage  a  doorway  admits  to 
a  chamber  cut  in  the  rock,  in  which  is  a  pit  descending 
to  a  lower  level,  and  giving  access  to  another  passage 
running  east,  with  a  tomb-chamber  at  the  end  of  it. 
The  upper  level  passage  and  chamber  are  marked 
on  the  plan  with  broken  lines,  the  lower  level  passage 
and  chamber  with  dotted  lines. 


8 


THE  TEMPLE  OF  TAHUTMES  IV. 


It  is  evident  that  this  was  a  tomb  considerably 
older  than  the  temple  ;  for  when  we  opened  it  there 
was  no  trace  of  the  original  interment,  but  the  upper 
passage  and  chamber  was  closely  filled  with  at  least 
two  layers  of  bodies,  over  eighty  being  packed  into  it. 
And  there  was  nothing  in  the  lower  passage  and 
chamber.  These  bodies  were  scarcely  to  be  called 
mummies,  as  they  seemed  to  have  been  buried  in 
wrappings  without  any  attempt  at  preserving  the 
flesh  by  resin,  oil,  or  salts.  Hence  there  was  only  a 
confused  mass  of  bones  amid  a  deep  soft  heap  of 
brown  dust.  This  burial-place  cannot  have  been  used 
later  than  the  building  of  these  chambers  belonging 
to  the  temple,  as  the  entrance  was  deeply  covered 
with  rubbish-filling  to  level  the  ground,  and  the  walls 
rested  on  the  rubbish.  At  the  same  time  we  cannot 
suppose  such  a  common  burial-ground  to  have  been 
standing  open  for  long  before  it  was  closed  up  for  the 
temple  building,  as  the  bodies  were  quite  undisturbed. 
Hence  it  seems  probable  that  this  was  an  older  and 
plundered  tomb,  used  as  a  common  burying-place — 
perhaps  for  the  workmen — during  the  reign  of 
Tahutmes  IV,  or  possibly  Amenhotep  H. 

The  only  things  found  here  with  the  bodies  were 
plain  vases  of  pottery.  These  were  all  collected,  and 
the  forms  are  shown  on  PL.  VH.  The  types  are 
coarser  and  worse  than  some  known  to  belong  to 
Tahutmes  HI  ;  compare  Nos.  4,  8,  12,  13,  and  18 
with  those  from  the  Maket  tomb  at  Kahun,  in 
"Illahun"  Pl.  XXVII,  Nos.  47,  34,  42,  40,  and  49. 
There  is  also  a  type.  No.  12,  almost  exactly  like  that 
found  in  the  temple  of  Amenhotep  II  (PL  V,  i).  All 
of  the  skulls  from  this  tomb  were  brought  to  England, 
and  some  of  the  bones.  There  is  a  great  diversity  in  the 
forms  of  the  skulls,  some  being  remarkably  round, 
and  others  long.  Had  I  realised  their  variation  at 
first,  I  would  have  preserved  the  whole  skeletons  along 
with  each  ;  but  presuming  that  they  would  be  much 
of  one  type,  being  all  of  one  place  and  date,  I  did  not 
think  it  needful  to  do  more  than  sample  the  skeletons. 
This  great  diversity  suggests  that  these  people  were 
not  natives  of  Thebes,  but  were  probably  foreign 
captives  employed  in  the  public  works,  and  collected 
from  all  over  Syria. 

18.  Passing  now  up  the  main  axis,  from  the  second 
court  we  reach  a  second  terrace  on  which  stood  the 
portico  of  the  temple.  This  must  have  been  a  fine 
structure,  being  100  cubits  wide  (172  ft.),  and  having 
a  double  colonnade  of  fourteen  columns.  The  width 
is  the  same  as  the  temple  of  Sety  I  at  Qurneh,  but  the 
columns  were  more  slender  and  closer,  being  fourteen 


in  place  of  ten.  On  the  other  hand,  the  depth  of  the 
double  colonnade  must  have  given  an  effect  more 
like  that  of  Deir  el  Baheri,  where  also  the  spacing  of 
the  columns  is  the  same  as  here,  though  twenty  or 
twenty-two  are  used  in  the  front  of  that  sumptuous 
temple  as  against  fourteen  here.  Of  these  columns 
portions  of  only  six  basements  remain,  and  mere 
hollows  indicate  the  places  of  most  of  the  others, 
though  of  nine  of  them  no  evidence  was  found  and 
they  are  only  shown  by  dotted  outlines. 

The  great  gate  to  the  peristyle  court  of  this  temple 
had  a  threshold  of  red  granite  (marked  G  on  the 
plan),  of  which  the  main  part  still  remains.  The 
square  outline  at  the  soutli  end  of  it  is  the  position  of 
the  jamb  which  can  still  be  traced.  At  the  south  end 
of  this  front  wall  one  stone  yet  remains  above  the 
foundation  level,  showing  the  dressed  faces. 

The  peristyle  court  is  unique  in  having  a  triple 
colonnade  along  the  back  and  both  sides.  As  only 
three  out  of  eight  columns  have  left  any  traces  of 
foundation  in  the  first  two  rows,  it  might  seem  not 
impossible  that  this  might  have  been  a  hypostyle 
hall,  of  which  all  the  central  part  had  left  no  trace. 
But  the  northern  half  is  so  far  complete  in  its 
evidences,  not  only  the  foundation,  but  the  actual 
circular  bases  remaining,  that  we  can  hardly  suppose 
it  to  have  continued  southward  without  leaving  some 
sign  either  of  stone  or  of  rock  cutting.  It  seems  then 
that  this  is  a  unique  piece  of  architecture  in  having  a 
triple  colonnade,  and  is  also  unusual  in  the  number  of 
columns.  Here  there  are  14  X  9 ;  the  double 
colonnade  of  Luxor  is  12  X  12,  of  the  Ramesseun 
8  X  10,  and  of  Khonsu  6x6;  while  the  great  hall  of 
Karnak  (which  is  hypostyle),  has  the  same  number  of 
columns  as  here,  with  a  central  avenue  of  larger  ones 
in  addition.  There  appears  to  have  been  a  doorway 
on  the  south  side  with  a  porch  over  it,  judging  from 
the  foundations.  This  is  analogous  to  the  doorway 
south  of  the  forecourts  of  the  temples  of  Ramessu  II, 
Merenptah,  and  l^amessu  III  ;  it  is  probable  there- 
fore that  it  had  a  fixed  ceremonial  purpose,  as  it  is 
repeated  in  four  temples. 

Of  the  shrine  and  back  of  the  temple  very  little  can 
be  determined.  There  was  a  second  columnar  space, 
probably  a  shallow  hall  of  six  columns  wide,  and  two 
or  perhaps  three  deep.  At  each  side  of  this  there 
must  have  been  a  narrow  chamber  or  passage :  and 
behind  this  a  row  of  small  chambers,  of  which  some 
foundati.ins  remain  at  the  south-west.  The  ground 
along  the  gouth  slopes  is  deeper  to  the  west,  so  that  the 
south-wes.  corner  is  very  low,  lying  in  a  small  ravine 


THE  WORK   OF  AMENHOTEP  III. 


that  slopes  across  that  corner  of  the  temenos.  Hence 
the  foundations  needed  to  be  built  to  a  considerable 
height ;  and  to  retain  the  chip  filling  around  them 
brick  walls  were  placed  between  the  stone  foundations, 
of  which  three  are  marked  in  solid  black  on  the 
plan. 

The  temenos  wall  is  cut  across  in  the  middle  of  the 
south  side  by  a  small  ravine,  so  that  the  east  end  is 
north  of  the  ravine  and  the  west  end  and  south-west 
corner  is  south  of  the  ravine,  isolated  thus  from  the 
temple.  The  south-west  corner  is  well  preserved 
to  a  considerable  depth,  being  buried  in  a  deep  bed 
of  chips  which  formed  the  artificial  levelling  up  of  the 
ground  at  this  part. 

19.  The  sculptures  found  in  the  temple  were  but 
very  few  considering  how  much  must  have  existed 
here.  A  slab  of  sandstone  with  a  figure  of  Amen- 
Min  in  relief  and  painted,  was  found  in  the  back  part 
of  the  temple,  and  several  coloured  fragments  which 
showed  how  the  shrine  had  been  decorated.  Several 
large  statues  of  Tahutmes  IV  were  carved  in  lime- 
stone and  painted  ;  of  these  a  few  fragments  were 
found,  mostly  ears.  The  lower  part  of  one  face 
is  of  value  as  a  portrait  (Pl.  VI,  4),  and  agrees 
closely  with  a  relief  of  the  king  found  also  in  this 
temple  (Pl.  VI,  5). 

A  few  tablets  remained  here.  One  mentioning  a 
campaign  to  Ethiopia  (PL.  I.  8)  ;  another  naming  a 
fort  in  Syria  called  after  the  king  (Pl.  I,  7).  A 
fragment  of  a  very  rudely  carved  tablet  may  have 
been  made  by  some  Syrian  workman  ;  it  represented 
Tahutmes  IV  adoring  the  goddess  Asit,  riding  on 
horseback,  armed  with  spear  and  shield  as  usual 
(PL.  VIII,  I). 

Within  the  temple  area  were  found  a  plummet  of 
green  quartzose  stone  (PL.  Ill,  21)  ;  and  a  part  of  a 
sistrum  in  blue  glazed  pottery  (PL.  Ill,  22). 

Some  rough  hieratic  quarrymarks  were  noted  on 
the  blocks  of  the  foundation,  of  which  three  examples 
are  given  on  Pl.  IX,  11-13.  Nos.  11  and  12  mark 
the  stones  as  for  the  building  of  the  temple  in  the 
southern  capital  for  his  majesty  ;  and  No.  13  has  the 
words  "  good  years,"  which  may  be  the  personal  name 
of  a  workman.  On  a  piece  of  a  large  vase,  found  in 
the  north-east  buildings,  were  figured  a  pair  of  sandals 
and  a  bronze  razor  (PL.  XX,  4)  ;  it  seems  not 
improbable  that  this  was  the  price  by  barter  of  the 
jar  of  wine  or  oil  on  which  they  are  marked.  Two 
other  pieces  of  hieratic  inscriptions  (Pl.  XX,  6,  7),  are 
described  by  Dr.  Spiegelberg. 


CHAPTER  IV. 
THE  WORK  OF  AMENHOTEP  IIL 

20.  On  applying  for  permission  to  excavate  at 
Thebes,  M.  de  Morgan  informed  me  that  he  reserved 
the  site  of  the  great  funerary  temple  of  Amenhotep  III 
for  his  own  work.  The  site  of  it  is  now  largely  under 
the  high  Nile  level,  as  the  water  rises  fourteen  feet  above 
the  bases  of  the  great  colossi,  and  has  deposited  Nile 
mud  to  a  height  of  eight  feet  above  the  bases.  Hence 
the  ground  is  now  mainly  cultivated,  and  expropriation 
of  the  cultivators  is  needful  before  working  on  the 
temple.  The  required  ground  had  been  already 
bought  for  the  Government,  as  I  was  informed,  and 
that  site  was,  therefore,  reserved.  It  happened,  how- 
ever, that,  as  I  was  allowed  to  work  upon  the  desert 
the  temple  behind  it,  which  I  found  to  have  been  built 
by  Merenptah,  I  there  discovered  a  large  amount  of 
sculpture  which  had  belonged  to  the  temple  of 
Amenhotep  III,  as  that  had  been  plundered  for 
material  by  Merenptah.  Hence,  though  I  did  not 
touch  the  great  temple  of  Amenhotep  III,  I  found 
what  are  very  probably  the  most  valuable  remains  of 
it.  These  are  noticed  here  in  the  order  in  which  they 
would  have  stood  in  the  temple.  I  also  found  that 
Amenhotep  III  had  largely  re-arranged  the  temple 
built  by  Amenhotep  II,  in  order  to  provide  for  the 
worship  of  his  daughter  Sitamen. 

21.  Many  portions  of  gigantic  couchant  jackals 
were  found,  carved  in  soft  sandstone.  They  had  been 
split  up  into  slices  along  the  horizontal  bedding  of 
the  stone,  and  laid  in  the  foundations  of  Merenptah. 
The  most  complete  that  I  measured  was,  from  the 
tail,  52  inches  to  the  toes  of  the  hind  foot,  92  to  the 
elbow  of  the  fore  leg,  102  to  the  chest,  and  1 14  to  the 
broken  stump  of  the  paw :  according  to  this  the 
whole  figure  would  have  been  about  135  inches  long, 
and  have  needed,  therefore,  a  base  at  least  lij  feet 
long.  The  width  across  the  hind  paws  is  43  inches,  and 
45  at  the  fore  legs.  These  jackals  were  couched  upon 
bases  of  sandstone,  having  a  torus  and  cavetto 
moulding  round  the  top,  a  line  of  inscription  below 
that,  and  a  border  of  dad  and  thet  girdle-tie  alternately 
beneath  the  inscription.  The  lines  of  inscription  are 
copied  in  Pl.  IX,  3  to  9.  On  the  front  end  of  these 
bases  was  some  projecting  mass ;  and  as  pieces  of 
statues  of  Amenhotep  III  (see  Pl.  VI,  9)  of  the  same 
work  and  material  are  constantly  found  associated 
with  these  pieces,  it  seems  most  likely  that  the  statues 
stood  backing  against  the  pedestals  of  the  jackals. 

c 


lO 


THE  WORK  OF   AMENHOTEP  III. 


The  pedestals  are  i6  inches  wide  on  either  side  of  the 
statue,  and  allowing  about  14  inches  more  for  the 
width  of  the  statue,  the  whole  would  be  about  46 
inches  wide,  or  just  suited  for  the  jackals,  which  are 
43  and  45  inches  across  the  base. 

Hence  we  may  restore  the  avenue  of  approach  to 
the  temple  of  Amenhotep  as  being  between  the  two 
lines  of  statues  of  the  king  in  Osiride  form,  with 
ankh  in  each  hand ;  the'  statues  backed  against  high 
pedestals  about  4  feet  wide  and  \\\  feet  long  ;  upon 
which  lay  gigantic  couchant  jackals,  the  emblem  of 
Anubis,  under  whose  protection  the  dead  king  was 
placed.  Upon  the  pedestals  were  also  figures  of  a 
young  priest  wearing  the  panther's  skin,  who  is  stated 
to  be  the  king's  son,  and  probably  is,  therefore, 
Amenhotep  IV — Akhenaten — in  his  boyhood. 

22.  Besides  these  jackals  there  were  also  limestone 
sphinxes,  with  the  royal  head.  These  were  not  so 
large,  the  bases  being  65  X  19  inches.  The  head  is 
not  detailed,  but  merely  blocked  out  and  probably 
intended  to  be  coloured  (see  PL.  VI,  7).  But  the 
portraiture  shows  closely  the  same  expression  as  in 
other  heads  of  the  king.  Two  of  these  sphinxes  were 
dropped  into  a  hole  on  their  sides,  head  to  tail,  back 
to  back,  beneath  one  of  the  pillars.  The  limestone 
had  somewhat  swelled  and  cracked,  so  that  the  head 
of  the  perfect  sphinx  was  loose,  and  I  removed  it 
therefore,  leaving  behind  the  body,  and  the  other 
headless  body. 

Of  statues,  a  face  in  black  granite  (see  PL.  VI,  8) 
was  found,  without  any  other  parts  of  the  figure.  It 
is  clearly  a  very  careful  piece  of  work,  and  probably 
one  of  the  best  portraits  of  the  king,  being  in  such  a 
laboriously  wrought  material.  It  accords  very  closely 
with  the  expression  of  the  other  heads  here,  and  the 
portraits  elsewhere. 

A  body  of  a  statue  in  limestone,  painted  about  life 
size,  was  found  in  the  southern  foundations  of  the 
first  court  of  Merenptah.  On  the  western  side  of  that 
court,  in  the  foundations,  are  fragments  of  a  colossal 
group  of  the  king  and  a  god,  carved  in  very  hard 
white  crystalline  limestone  with  exquisite  finish  ;  a 
fragment  of  the  hieroglyphs  is  copied  in  PL.  I,  5. 
On  the  northern  side  of  the  second  court,  in  the 
foundations,  is  a  head  of  a  colossal  statue  in  the  same 
limestone,  50  inches  through  and  48  inches  high. 
This  would  imply  that  it  was  24  feet  high,  if  a  seated 
figure.  Another  head  of  the  same  limestone,  near 
that,  belonged  to  a  sphinx  ;  it  is  60  inches  from  the 
chin  to  the  back,  which  would  imply  a  length  of  21 
feet     The  head  of  a  jackal  in  limestone,  also  near 


there,  is  62  inches  long.  All  these  colossal  heads  of 
the  king  are  battered  and  broken  so  much  that  they  are 
not  worth  removal :  but  they,  at  least,  show  us  how 
magnificent  was  the  sculpture  in  material,  execution, 
and  size,  which  adorned  the  temple.  Several  blocks 
of  limestone  from  the  Amenhotep  temple  were  used 
up ;  in  particular,  an  enormous  one  in  the  N.W. 
corner  of  the  first  court  of  Merenptah  lies  face  down. 
We  tunnelled  beneath  it,  and  found  a  fine  and  perfectly 
preserved  scene  of  offering,  the  carving  of  which 
retains  its  colouring  intact. 

23.  Of  the  portable  works  of  Amenhotep,  two  of 
special  interest  were  found.  The  foundation  of  one 
column  of  Merenptah  was  formed  of  the  two  pieces  of 
the  limestone  stele  of  PL.  X,  laid  face  down  on  the 
sand  bed.  The  upper  part  of  the  stele  shows  Amen- 
hotep making  offerings  to  Amen :  on  the  one  side 
presenting  Maat,  the  goddess  of  truth,  on  the  other 
side  presenting  wine.  The  figures  and  names  of 
Amen  had  been  entirely  erased  from  the  stele,  doubt- 
less by  Akhenaten,  and  have  been  re-sculptured  on 
the  erased  surface  by  Sety  I,  who  adds  a  line,  saying : 
"  Monumental  restoration  made  by  the  son  of  the  sun 
Mer-en-ptah  Sety  for  his  father  Amen."  Below  this 
are  two  scenes :  on  the  right  hand  the  king  in  his 
chariot  driving  over  the  Negroes,  on  the  left  hand  the 
king  driving  over  the  Syrians.  Probably  the  stele 
was  placed  with  its  face  westwards,  so  that  the  people 
of  the  north  and  the  south  looked  to  their  respective 
sides  ;  just  as  in  the  pylons  of  Tahutmes  III  and  of 
Taharqa  the  northern  people  are  north  of  the  axis, 
and  the  southerners  are  to  the  south.  At  the  base 
we  read  of  the  subjugation  of  all  peoples,  of  Naharaina, 
and  Kush,  the  miserable  Reten,  and  the  Upper  Retenu 
under  the  feet  of  this  good  god,  like  the  sun,  for  ever. 
The  large  size  of  this  tablet,  6  feet  high  and  31^  feet 
wide,  and  the  very  delicate  and  finished  style  of  its 
sculpture,  makes  it  one  of  the  finest  works  of  this 
age. 

24.  The  other  stele  is  shown  on  plates  XI,  XII. 
It  is  a  block  of  dark  grey  syenite,  infiltrated  with 
quartz  veins  :  it  is  10  feet  3  inches  high,  5  feet  4  inches 
wide,  and  13  inches  thick;  the  condition  is  perfect 
with  the  exception  of  a  small  chip  on  one  edge.  The 
colouring  is  complete  in  the  scene  of  Merenptah  on 
the  back  of  it ;  and  some  of  the  yellow  colour  remains 
in  the  scene  of  Amenhotep  III. 

The  inscription  and  scene  of  Amenhotep  III.  has 
been  largely  erased  by  Akhenaten  ;  the  figures  of 
Amen  were  removed,  and  all  the  inscription  down  to 
within  a  few  lines  of  the  bottom.     The  original  face 


I 


THE  TEMPLE  OF  MERENPTAH. 


II 


is  still  left  at  the  bottom,  along  the  edges,  and  around 
the  figures  of  Amenhotep  III ;  and  these  parts  can 
be  distinguished  by  the  difference  of  reflection  in  the 
photograph.  This  erasure  had  not  been  complete 
enough  to  prevent  the  inscription  being  traceable,  for 
the  re-engraving  of  it  under  Sety  I.  had  followed 
exactly  the  old  lines,  as  is  proved  by  a  deeper  bit  of 
erasure  occurring  where  the  name  of  Amen  comes  in 
the  re-engraving.  And  had  it  been  re-engraved  from 
a  written  copy  preserved  in  the  archives,  there  would 
not  be  certain  mistakes  in  the  text  of  one  sign  in 
place  of  another  like  it.  Hence  we  conclude  that 
Akhenaten  had  erased  the  inscription  lightly,  and 
only  destroyed  completely  the  names  and  figures  of 
Amen. 

After  this,  Sety  I  restored  the  whole  inscription  and 
figures,  as  he  had  done  on  the  limestone  tablet  noticed 
above.  He  recorded  his  restoration  in  a  column  of 
deeply-cut  signs,  "  Monumental  restoration  made  by 
the  king  Maat-men-ra  for  his  father  Amen-Ra,  king 
of  all  the  gods."  The  translation  of  the  inscription 
will  be  seen  in  Dr.  Spiegelberg's  chapter.  The  re-use 
of  the  stele  by  Merenptah  is  noticed  in  the  next 
chapter. 

In  the  brickwork  of  the  long  chambers  north  of 
Merenptah's  temple,  many  of  the  bricks  bear  stamps 
of  Amenhotep  HI.,  and  not  one  was  found  of  Me- 
renptah. It  appears,  then,  that  the  later  king  even 
obtained  all  his  bricks  by  plundering  the  earlier 
temple. 

The  other  works  of  Amenhotep  HI.  have  been 
described :  the  rearrangement  of  the  temple  of 
Amenhotep  II.,  apparently  to  fit  it  for  the  worship 
of  his  daughter  Sitamen,  whose  figure  was  found  on 
one  block  ;  and  the  rebuilding  of  part  of  the  chapel 
of  Uazmes,  as  shown  by  the  ring  beneath  the 
threshold. 


CHAPTER  V. 
THE  TEMPLE  OF   MERENPTAH. 

25.  As  we  have  just  noticed,  in  the  previous  chapter, 
the  temple  of  Merenptah  was  constructed  out  of  the 
materials  of  that  of  Amenhotep  III.  In  this  chapter, 
therefore,  we  shall  ignore  the  details  of  the  re-use  of 
material  and  consider  solely  the  work  of  Merenptah. 

The  plan  of  the  temple  is  given  in  PL.  XXV, 
which  may  be  usefully  compared  with  that  of  the 
Ramesseum.  The  great  pylon  in  front  has  been 
entirely  removed,  and  the  only  proof  of  it  is  the  deep 


sand  bed,  bounded  by  brick  walling  above,  and  the 
sides  of  the  pit  cut  in  native  marly  Nile  mud  below- 
The  levels  from  the  water  in  February  1 896  are  : 

Brick  wall 1 74  inches 

Native  marl,  or  old  Nile  mud   .          .  105      „ 

Native  sand   .         .         .         .         .  20      „ 

Water  ......  o      ,, 

This  native  mud  is  a  thick  bed  of  old  Nile  mud, 
deposited  in  prehistoric  times  when  the  Nile  was 
subsiding  from  the  far  higher  level  which  it  had 
occupied.  These  high-level  mud-beds  are  found  in 
many  parts  of  the  country,  such  as  on  the  plain  by 
Kom  Ombo,  and  on  the  plain  of  Tell  el  Amarna. 
Here,  at  Thebes,  they  are  overlaid  by  very  coarse 
gravels,  as  may  be  seen  in  the  great  scarp  on  the  west 
of  Tausert's  temple.  This  shows  that  the  Nile  had 
subsided  and  run  dry  enough  to  deposit  its  mud, 
owing  to  lack  of  rainfall  ;  and  then  had  again  risen 
with  torrential  rains  which  enabled  it  to  carry  down 
twenty  feet  thick  of  large  gravels,  many  of  the  flints 
of  which  weigh  several  pounds.  The  section  above 
exhibits  this  old  Nile  mud  resting  on  native  sand. 
The  foundation  pit  is  a  great  work,  being  7  feet  deep 
in  native  mud,  with  6  feet  more  of  walling  above  that, 
in  all  1 3  feet  deep,  208  feet  long,  and  37  feet  wide ; 
allowing  about  15  or  20  inches  of  space  around  the 
stones,  this  would  show  a  pylon  base  of  I20  X  20 
cubits.  The  Ramesseum  pylon  was  132  x  20  cubits. 
The  sides  were  traced  all  along  to  the  bottom,  and 
the  north  quarter  was  completely  turned  over  down 
to  the  native  sand,  in  search  of  foundation  deposits ; 
but  we  found  nothing.  The  passage-way  leading  to 
it  at  the  north  end  between  brick  walls  was  evidently 
the  entrance  to  the  stairway  of  the  pylon  leading  to 
the  top  ;  this  stair  is  similarly  at  the  north  end  of  the 
Ramesseum  pylon. 

26.  Passing  the  pylon  we  enter  the  front  court, 
which  had  a  colonnade  of  six  pillars  on  either  side  ; 
this  was  about  two-thirds  of  the  size  of  the  Ramesseum 
court  in  each  direction.  It  had  an  entrance  in  the  south 
side,  with  two  halls  of  four  columns,  and  chambers  at 
the  side.  The  similar  entrance  in  the  Ramesseum 
had  pillars  of  the  same  size,  but  twice  as  many  in 
each  direction.  The  perpendicular  shading  here  on 
the  east  side  of  the  wall  of  this  entrance  indicates  a 
sloping  foot  to  the  wall  at  about  45° ;  the  object  of 
this  was  to  prevent  any  use  of  the  space  between  the 
wall  and  the  pylon. 

The  second  court  appears  to  have  had  colonnades 
only  on  the  front  and  back,  and  not  at  the  sides. 
The  bases  for  Osiride  pillars  remain  along  the  west 

C   2 


12 


THE  TEMPLE  OF  MERENPTAH. 


back-,  and  a  lai^e  square  base  on  the  north  side 
appears  as  if  it  were  for  a  statue. 

From  behind  the  row  of  Osiride  pillars  an  exit  in 
the  south  side  led  down  steps  to  the  great  tank. 
This  tank  had  probably  been  lined  with  stone,  though 
now  only  the  hole  cut  in  the  old  Nile  mud  stratum 
remains.  It  was  filled  with  washed-in  earth,  and, 
though  we  went  down  to  water-level,  we  could  not 
reach  the  bottom.  The  other  tanks  or  sacred  lakes 
are  south  of  the  temple  at  Karnak,  and  north  of  that 
at  Koptos.  None  have  been  observed  in  connection 
with  other  funerary  temples. 

The  third  court  was  a  hypostyle  hall  of  twelve 
columns.  Behind  that  was  another  hypostyle  of  eight 
columns,  and  chambers  lay  at  the  back  of  this  and  on 
either  side. 

27.  The  altar  chamber  was  found  at  the  N.W. 
corner.  The  base  of  the  altar  was  not  quite  square, 
being  in  width  62- 6N,  65 •4E,  63-55,  63  vW.  The 
edge  of  the  basement  of  it  was  73 '5,  76  "6,  74*7,  and 
77*6  on  corresponding  sides.  The  sloping  way  up  to 
it  was  30*6  wide  and  92*2  long,  with  a  basement 
39*4  wide.  The  angle  of  slope  was  indicated  by  the 
base  line  of  a  row  of  hieroglyphs  remaining,  with  part 
of  the  signs  ne/ie/i,  showing  that  the  inscription  read 
down  the  slope ;  the  angle  was  i  on  4,  giving  a  rise 
of  23  inches,  which,  with  a  step  of  about  10  inches  at 
the  lower  end,  would  show  a  height  of  33  inches  for 
the  altar.  The  slope  was  therefore  merely  formal, 
and  was  not  actually  used  to  ascend  the  altar. 

This  may  be  compared  with  the  altar  at  Deir  el 
Bahri,  which  is  similarly  in  the  N.W.  corner  of  the 
site  with  a  chamber  behind  it,  a  precisely  analogous 
arrangement.  The  steps  also  slope  up  from  the  west. 
The  steps  at  Deir  el  Bahri  are  41  wide  and  180  long, 
against  30-6  wide  and  92  long  here;  they  therefore 
served  for  actual  ascent  to  the  altar.  The  altar  itself 
at  Deir  el  Bahri  was  193  x  153  inches,  instead  of 
only  63  inches  square  as  here.  Finding  that  in  two 
temples,  one  of  the  earliest  and  one  of  the  latest  of 
this  class,  the  altar  is  in  the  same  position,  we  may 
look  to  the  plans  of  other  temples  in  search  of  the 
same  feature.  In  the  Ramesseum  the  large  chamber 
Q  of  Lepsius,  north  of  the  hall  E  of  Baedecker,  might 
have  been  an  altar  court.  In  the  temple  of  Sety  at 
Qumeh  a  hall  of  columns  on  the  north  side  has 
apparently  in  the  middle  of  it  two  blocks  of  stone 
forming  a  square  of  131  inches,  which  may  well  be 
the  base  of  an  altar  (Denkmaler  I,  86) ;  and  at 
Medinet  Habu  is  a  large  hall  in  an  analogous 
position,  which  might  have  contained  an  altar.     It 


will  be  a  point  of  investigation,  in  all  future  clearing 
of  temples,  to  search  for  the  altar  chamber. 

28.  The  mass  of  brick  store-chambers  on  the  north 
of  the  temple  are  preserved  to  a  height  of  four  or 
five  feet  in  the  middle,  but  are  entirely  denuded 
away  at  the  N.W.  corner.  The  long  narrow  space 
at  the  south  side  of  this  block  was  doubtless  for  a 
stairway,  of  which  a  few  steps  of  brickwork  yet 
remain.  The  columns  in  the  hall  which  gives  access 
to  the  western  part  of  the  block  are  27*4  to  29-3  in 
diameter,  some  being  slightly  oval.  A  square  abacus 
was  found,  27-0  X  27-2  x  10  inches  high.  The 
distance  between  the  abaci  was  70  inches,  according 
to  the  spacing  on  the  architraves,  which  were  26 '7 
wide  and  33  "8  deep.  This  depth  of  the  architrave 
was  to  allow  of  its  appearing  square  beneath  the  arch 
of  brickwork  that  rested  on  it.  The  spacing  was 
thus : — 

Top  of  architrave     .  .  ,  .  .         33*8 

Butment  of  brickwork      .         .         .         .         28 'o 

Inscription  borders  .         .         .         .  /        ^ 

\to    3-9 
Lower  edge    ......  o 

Thus,  after  5  •  8  inches  of  the  top  were  covered  by  the 
spring  of  the  brick  arch,  the  architrave  appeared  square 
in  section,  and  with  the  inscription  having  an  equal 
border  above  and  below  it.  The  roofing  between  the 
architraves  was  by  brick  arching,  of  which  a  fallen  mass 
was  found  in  the  hall,  three  courses  thick.  From  the 
measurements  taken  the  inner  diameter  of  this  brick 
arch  would  have  been  68  inches,  and  the  thickness  of 
the  three  courses  is  28  inches.  The  breadth  of  the 
spaces  between  the  architraves  being  72,  56,  and 
68  inches,  agrees  to  this  width  of  arch. 

Another  piece  of  an  architrave  from  this  temple 
varies  in  size,  being  only  24*5  wide,  but  39*0  deep. 
The  spacing  was  thus  : — 

Top  of  architrave 39*0 

(Brickwork 30' S)? 

Inscription  l)order {     ■ 

Lower  edge   ......  o 

This  was  a  wider  band  of  inscription,  and  can 
hardly  have  belonged  to  this  hall,  but  yet  it  is  too 
narrow  an  architrave  for  any  other  columns  that  are 
known  here.  That  it  belonged  to  Merenptah  appears 
from  the  hieroglyphs  being  exactly  in  the  same  style 
as  his,  and  coloured  dull  blue  in  the  same  manner ; 
but  it  was  found  in  the  Ramesseum  as  a  re-used 
block  in  a  restoration  by  Ramessu  III.  The  line  of 
brick  butment  is  inserted  on  the  supposition  of 
leaving  an   equal   border  above  and   below  the  in- 


THE   TEMPLE   OF  TAUSERT. 


13 


scription,  and  that  this  architrave  was  designed  to 
cariy  a  brick  arch  appears  from  the  extra  height 
above  the  inscription.  The  bases  of  the  columns  are 
49-7  across  the  top,  54*7  in  the  middle,  and  15  high  ; 
they  contract  equally  to  the  top  and  bottom.  The 
inner  lengths  of  these  store  galleries  was  evidently 
the  designed  part,  as  they  are  610,  823,  418,  427 
inches,  or  30,  40,  20,  20  cubits  of  20  "3,  20-57,  20*9, 
21*3  inches  respectively.  This  gradual  lengthening 
out  of  the  cubit  from  west  to  east  is  curious.  The 
widths  of  the  galleries  are  3  and  6  cubits  of  20 '6. 
The  circle  at  the  S.E.  of  the  brick  building  is  a 
granary.  Nothing  whatever  was  found  in  these 
galleries,  not  even  any  fallen  roofing ;  hence  it 
appears  probable  that  they  had  wooden  roofs,  which 
were  all  removed  for  material  in  a  short  time. 

At  the  southern  entrance  to  the  first  court  a  capital 
still  remains,  of  the  bell  or  papyrus  form.  It  is  27 
inches  wide  at  top,  18 -7  at  base,  and  the  column 
17 '4  thick,  while  the  height  is  22  inches.  This 
cannot  have  belonged  to  the  columns  remaining 
there,  which  are  33  thick  on  bases  Jj  wide  in  the 
inner  vestibule,  while  the  bases  are  (^  wide  in  the 
outer  vestibule.  There  must  therefore  have  been 
some  smaller  columns  in  this  region. 

Foundation  deposits  were  searched  for  in  the 
corners  of  the  pylon  site,  under  the  corners  of  the 
foundations,  and  along  most  of  the  length  of  the 
foundations,  and  at  the  back  corners  of  the  temenos. 
Only  a  few  blue  beads,  mostly  wasters,  from  a  factory, 
were  found,  and  a  few  objects  in  coloured  glaze,  blue, 
red,  and  white  (III,  28-34),  with  two  small  objects  of 
sheet  bronze  (III,  35,  37).  Most  of  these  were  in  the 
trench  west  of  the  hall  of  eight  columns,  apparently 
at  the  entrance  to  the  cella. 

29.  The  greatest  discovery  in  the  temple  was  that 
of  the  black  granite  stele  of  Merenptah,  engraved  on 
the  back  of  the  stele  of  Amenhotep  III,  which  lay  in 
the  S.W.  corner  of  the  first  court.  It  had  evidently 
stood  against  the  south  wall  in  the  corner,  and  been 
overthrown  forwards.  It  rested  on  the  base  of  the 
column  at  its  east  side.  This  stele  has  been  described 
among  the  works  of  Amenhotep  III,  and  its  inscrip- 
tion, which  is  of  the  greatest  value,  not  only  for  the 
Israel  campaign,  but  also  for  the  other  places  named 
in  Syria  and  for  the  Libyan  war,  is  fully  treated  by 
Dr.  Spiegelberg  in  this  volume.  The  photograph  of 
the  inscription  is  given  on  PL.  XIII,  and  the  facsimile 
copy  of  the  inscription  on  PL.  XIV. 

Portions  of  two  colossal  seated  statues  of  Merenptah 
in  black  granite  were  found  at  the  back  of  the  second 


court.  They  had  probably  stood  on  pedestals,  one 
on  each  side  of  the  axis.  The  lower  part  of  one  was 
found,  and  this  was  left  in  place ;  but  the  upper  part 
of  the  other  statue  was  brought  away  to  the  Cairo 
Museum.  It  gives  the  best  portrait  known  of  Me- 
renptah (PL.  VI,  10,  11).  The  colour  is  still  fresh 
upon  it,  yellow  on  the  head-dress,  red  on  the  lips, 
white  and  black  in  the  eyes.  This  was,  next  to  the 
Israel  inscription,  the  greatest  prize  of  the  year. 

In  the  ruins  of  the  first  court  was  also  found  a 
small  tablet  of  limestone  with  fresh  colouring  on  it, 
representing  Pen-rannut  adoring  an  official  named 
Ptah-hes.  A  few  ostraka  with  inscriptions  were 
found,  mainly  at  the  south  entrance  to  the  first  court 
(XX,  8-13) ;  and  some  hieratic  quarry  marks  are 
found  upon  the  blocks  of  stone  in  the  foundations 
(IX,  14-23).  Both  of  these  classes  are  discussed  by 
Ur.  Spiegelberg. 


CHAPTER  VI. 
THE  TEMPLE  OF  TAUSERT. 

30.  The  site  of  this  temple  is  in  a  levelled  area, 
which  has  been  cut  into  the  sloping  mass  of  Nile 
gravels,  leaving  a  steep  scarp  along  the  north  and 
west  sides  of  the  area.  This  area  was  levelled  for 
some  other  purpose  earlier  than  this  temple,  as  the 
temple  is  not  square  with  it,  and  a  part  of  the  west 
scarp  has  been  cut  away  to  admit  of  the  N.W.  corner 
of  the  temple.  See  General  Plan,  PL.  XXII,  and 
Wall  Plan,  PL.  XXVI. 

Of  the  building  of  the  temple  only  a  few  stones  of 
the  foundation  remained,  between  the  deposits  marked 
II  and  VIII  on  the  Plan,  PL.  XXVI ;  otherwise  the 
only  evidences  of  it  were  the  foundation  trenches  cut  in 
the  gravel  and  marl  ground,  to  a  depth  of  about  five 
feet,  and  filled  with  clean  sand.  These  trenches  were  all 
cleared  in  search  of  foundation  deposits,  except  a  part 
at  the  back  of  the  cella,  which  was  deep  in  accumulated 
dust  and  chips  from  tombs  cut  in  the  scarp  above  it. 

The  general  plan  of  the  temple  is  much  like 
Merenptah's.  There  is  the  thick  pylon,  which  here 
seems  to  have  been  hollow,  so  that  no  foundation  was 
cut  in  the  middle  of  it.  This  pylon  would  have  been 
no  X  20  or  24  cubits,  against  I20  X  20  in  Me- 
renptah's, or  1 32  X  20  in  the  Ramesseum.  Next  is  the 
first  court,  which  was  here  75  X  50  cubits,  just  the  same 
size  as  that  of  Merenptah.  In  place,  however,  of  a 
second  large  court  and  two  hypostyle  halls,  there  are 
here  only  three  small  halls,  not  as  large  as  the  smallest 


«4 


THE  TEMPLE   OF  TAUSERT. 


of  those  of  Merenptah.  Behind  these  is  the  cella  and 
chambers  on  either  side  of  it.  Owing  to  the  greater 
number  of  small  chambers  (in  lieu  of  the  brick  store- 
rooms of  Merenptah),  the  actual  area  of  stone  building 
of  Tausert  is,  however,  equal  to  that  of  Merenptah. 

31.  The  foundation  deposits  were  the  most  valuable 
result  attained  here.  They  were  placed  at  the  two  back 
comers  (V  and  VI,  PL.  XXVI),  along  the  side  walls 
(III  and  IV),  and  at  the  main  cross  wall  (I  and  II), 
and  under  the  doorways  (VII  and  VIII).  No  system 
or  order  was  traceable  in  the  positions  of  the  objects. 
In  general  it  seems  that  the  large  block  of  stone  with 
cartouches  was  laid  down  in  the  trench  upon  a  wide 
mat,  sometimes  with  the  copper  models  of  tools  beneath 
it,  and  a  heap  of  small  glazed  objects  were  poured  out 
over  it  The  region  of  each  deposit  was  indicated  by 
blue  glazed  beads  scattered  in  the  sand  around. 

The  numbers  of  each  object  found  in  the  deposits, 
with  references  to  the  Plates,  are  as  follow  : — 


h 

h 

1^- 

q" 

Q 

'h 

1- 

•a 

PL.  XVL 

1  .  . 

2  .  . 

3  .  • 

4  .  . 

i  :  : 

7  .  . 

8  .   . 

9  .  . 

10  .  . 

11  .  . 

12  .   . 

13  .   . 

14  .   . 

'S  •  • 

„  plain. 

16  .  . 

17  .  . 

18  .  . 

19  .  . 
ao,  21  . 
22  .  . 

»i   '    ' 

24  .   . 

U  :  : 
27  .  . 
28-30  . 
31  .  . 

3 

2 

9 
oval 

>3 

I 

9 
3* 

5 
«S 

22 

33 

i 
4 
17 
9 
9 
16 

4 

'3 

2 

*6 

'i 

4 
2 

20 
2 

16 

14 
22 

8 

7 
I 

3 

7 

5 

15 

4 

I 

6 

2 
3 

4 

3 

2 

16 

27 
I 

'S 

7 

16 

3 

'7 
t 

4 
II 

30 

16 

8 

oval 

42 

52 

I 
42 

12 

S3 

I 
1 

4 
4 

37 
26 

I 

4 
'3 

17 
23 
30 

7 
I 

14 

'& 
21 

3 
16 

«9 
14 

S 

10 
'S 

49 
24 

3 
29 

7 
27 

I 
I 

4 

2 
6 

13 
16 

13 

7 

21 

16 

7 
34 
31 

7 

14 
52 

7 

'e 

I 
21 

6 

II 

7 

7 

14 

4 
6 

7 
3 
6 

S 

I 

6 

10 

7 
9 

2 

'6 
10 
10 

23 

2 

IS 

9 

48 

I 

1 

29 

9 

37 

I 

I 
I 

I 
4 

I 

Si 
S3 
59 
4 
68 

55 
165 

247 
29 
163 
146 
236 
8 

23 
16 
12 

75 

33 

67 

159 

43 

106 

2 

I 

I 

4 
6 

I 
9 

7 

I 
8 

«9 

I 
I 

3 

I 

I 

5 

32  .  . 

33  •  • 

34  .  . 
li:  : 

5  :  : 

39  .  . 

40  •  . 
Pu  XVIL 

1  .  . 

2  .  . 

I 

I 

Incom|>>ete. 
'     1 

Of  these  deposits  the  first  three  are  incompletely 
recorded,  owing  to  the  thefts  by  the  local  workmen. 
After  I  had  discharged  them,  and  used  men  and 
boys  from  a  distance,  I  believe  nothing  whatever 
was  abstracted.  Unfortunately  these  thefts  vitiate 
any  conclusions  about  the  total  quantities  of  each 
type.  From  what  I  saw  afterwards  I  suppose  that 
the  first  three  deposits  were  about  of  the  same 
average  richness  as  the  others.  One  point  is  pretty 
clear,  that  there  were  an  equal  number  of  the  bulls' 
heads  and  haunches  of  the  full  type  (8,  12),  and 
probably  equal  numbers  of  the  full  type  of  sacrificed 
ox  (10),  the  flat  type  of  bull's  head  (11),  and  the 
flower  (19).  But  it  is  obvious  in  the  complete 
deposits  that  no  precise  numbers  were  set  aside  for 
each,  though  in  some  cases  there  is  roughly  the  same 
proportion  of  different  objects.  This  looks  as  if  all 
the  glazed  objects  had  been  put  in  a  basket,  mixed 
together,  and  then  turned  out  by  the  handful  at  the 
ceremony  of  the  foundation.  Many  of  the  objects 
having  been  broken  anciently  when  buried  shows 
that  they  had  been  roughly  treated. 

32.  Some  notes  may  be  made  upon  the  objects  drawn 
here.     In  PL.  XVI.  the  scarabs  Nos.  i  and  7  are  all 
moulded  and  not  worked  by  hand  ;   they  are  made 
in  two  pieces,  a  thick  back  in  which  a  groove  is  made 
for  a  hole  from  end  to  end,  and  a  thin    face  which 
in  several  cases  has  split  off  the  back.     The  colour 
has   in   all    cases   been   blue  ;   but   those  in  damper 
parts  of  the  site  at  the  west  end,  where  the  ground 
was  deeper,  are  more  or  less  whitened  and  decomposed. 
The  square  plaques,  Nos.  2,  4,  6,  are  also  moulded 
in  two  pieces  stamped  on  both  sides,  with  a  groove  in 
one  piece  to  provide  a  hole  from  end  to  end.     The 
colour  of  all  of  these,  and  of  the  scarabs,  is  a  very 
brilliant   indigo    blue,   when    in    good    preservation. 
The  long  plaques,  3  and  5,  are   plain  on  the  back 
being  simply  pressed    in   a   mould  ;    they  are  white, 
blue,  and  dark  violet.     The  cartouches  are  also  found 
on  some  figures  of  fish,  15,  of  ox  haunches,  14,  and 
on    rings,    21.     The   models   of  ox   heads    (11,   12). 
haunches    (8,   13,  14),  and   bound   oxen    (9,  10)    are 
of  two   kinds :    some   in   high   relief,   well    rounded 
(8,  10,  12),  others  flat  in  form  and  marked  out  with 
mere  lines  (9,  li,  13,  14).     The  tied-up  birds  (18)  are 
like  those  at  Tell  el  Amarna :  some  examples  are  of 
blue  glaze,  others  white,  and  some  violet.     The  same 
variety  of  colour  is  found    in   the   examples  of  the 
lotus  flower,   16.     The  flower  19  has  been  supposed 
to  be  a  hand,  but  the  earlier  type  in  the  Ramesseum 
and  Merenptah's  deposits  shows  it  to  be  a  flower. 


THE   TEMPLE  OF  TAUSERT. 


15 


Turning  to  the  metal  objects,  they  are  all  made 
in  thin  sheet  copper,  to  judge  by  their  softness  and 
absence  of  corrosion.  The  piece  23  looks  as  if  it 
were  a  model  ingot,  cast  in  that  form  for  convenience 
of  lifting  it  and  of  securing  it  on  animals  in  travelling  ; 
the  four  lugs  serve  as  handles  by  which  two  or  four 
men  could  lift  it,  and  also  for  securing  it  by  rope 
lashing.  The  same  form  is  known  in  the  ingot  of  tin 
found  at  Falmouth,  weighing  158  lbs.  and  therefore 
needing  four  men  to  lift  it  about  readily  {Evans, 
Ancient  Bronze,  fig.  514).  No  actual  ingots  have 
been  yet  found  in  Egypt,  so  far  as  I  remember.  The 
two  handled  dishes  24,  25,  probably  represent  mortar 
trays.  The  long  slips,  26,  27,  seem  to  be  crowbars, 
as  several  were  uniformly  bent  up  at  one  end  ;  these 
show  then  the  only  crowbars  yet  known  from  Egypt. 
The  hoes,  28,  29,  30,  are  of  the  type  well  known  in 
later  Egyptian  bronze,  where  the  flat  sheet  of  metal 
is  wrapped  round  the  handle.  The  axe,  31,  is  of  the 
usual  type  ;  as  are  also  the  adze,  32,  and  knife,  33. 
The  knife  with  a  spur  on  it,  34,  is  a  new  form,  the 
meaning  of  which  is  obscure.  The  mortise  chisel,  35 
and  flat  chisel,  36,  are  of  the  usual  forms.  The 
ebony  cramp,  37,  is  a  model  of  the  wooden  cramps 
used  for  linking  together  the  stones  of  a  building, 
and  bears  the  cartouche  with  the  title  Neb  taut.  The 
two  model  corn  grinders  of  yellow  quartzite  have  the 
nefer  signs  and  a  border  line  painted  on  in  black.  A 
piece  of  red  glass,  39,  is  partly  decomposed  to  yellow  ; 
what  it  represents  is  unknown. 

Besides  these  small  objects  there  were  also  in  five 
of  the  deposits  a  block  of  sandstone  (XVII,  2) 
bearing  the  two  cartouches  of  Tausert  carefully 
engraved.  And  in  one  deposit  a  brick  of  coarse 
mortar  (XVII,  i)  which  has  been  stamped  with  the 
cartouche  ;  it  has  been  laid  in  the  hole  while  soft, 
and  pressed  out  of  shape,  and  further  trodden  upon. 
Many  jars  were  found,  as  fig.  5,  and  some  bowls  and 
pans,  figs.  8,  9,  lo ;  a  large  number  of  little  cups, 
figs.  4,  6,  were  in  most  of  the  deposits  ;  and  a  few 
handles  of  jars  are  also  drawn  here,  for  the  sake  of 
dated  types.  Some  of  the  potsherds  bear  inscriptions, 
which  were  written  on  them  as  datings  of  wine,  when 
the  jars  were  in  use  (XIX,  1-4).  Of  animal  offerings 
there  was  a  calf  s  haunch  in  deposits  I,  4,  and  6 ;  and 
a  call's  head  in  deposits  4  and  6  ;  a  pigeon's  head  in 
deposit  6,  and  a  pigeon  in  deposit  i.  In  deposit  7 
was  a  thick  bed  of  leaves  of  a  tree  mixed  with  beads 
above  the  glazed  objects,  and  the  copper  models  of 
tools  lay  on  the  top  of  the  leaves. 

We  now  turn  to  consider  the  name  and  position  of 


the  builder  of  this  temple.  At  first  the  resemblance 
of  the  cartouches  to  those  of  Ramessu  II  led  us  to 
think  that  they  were  variants  of  that  king ;  but  it 
seemed  plain  when  examined  that  these  names 
belong  to  a  queen,  for  on  XVI,  I,  2,  5,  and  XVII,  2, 
we  have  clearly  sit,  not  si  ra.  And  on  the  cartouche  in 
XVI,  3,  6,  7  and  XVII,  2  there  is  clearly  t  and  not  ra 
at  the  top,  and  over  the  sotep ;  and  the  seated  figure 
has  not  the  feather  of  Maat  but  the  double  crown  of 
Mut ;  hence  it  cannot  be  attributed  to  Ramessu  II. 
The  date  of  this  deposit  is  nearly  fixed  by  the  wine 
jar  inscriptions  found  in  it  being  of  Sety  II  ;  and 
hence  it  is  almost  certainly  a  very  short  time  after 
that  reign.  Now  the  important  queen  Tausert  comes 
next  after  Sety  II,  as  queen  of  Siptah  ;  and  we  can 
hardly  refuse  to  read  here  therefore  in  the  cartouches, 
Ta-user-t :  sotep-n-Mut :  sit-ra :  mery-amen.  The 
form  of  the  cartouches  is  manifestly  copied  from  those 
of  Ramessu  II,  and  ingeniously  adapted  as  a  parody 
or  imitation  of  what  was  already  so  utterly  familiar  to 
the  eyes  of  every  Egyptian  in  those  times.  Now 
that  this  new  cartouche  is  definitely  established 
by  all  these  instances,  we  can  see  that  a  few  other 
examples  of  it  may  have  been  previously  misplaced 
as  being  of  Ramessu  II,  one  for  certain  from  Gurob 
("  Kahun  "  XXIII,  50). 

33.  Here  we  may  well  observe  the  question  of  the 
relation  of  the  reign  of  this  queen  to  that  of  Siptah 
her  husband.  Here  in  this  temple  there  is  no 
evidence  of  Siptah;  nor  can  the  objects  have  "been 
made  at  the  same  time  as  the  foundation  deposits  of 
Siptah,  as  there  are  differences  throughout  in  the 
colour  and  form  of  every  class  of  object.  Was  then 
her  independent  reign,  and  this  temple,  before  or 
after  that  of  Siptah?  There  is  most  conclusive 
evidence  in  the  4th  deposit  of  Siptah,  as  there  was 
found  a  scarab  of  Tausert,  like  XVI,  7,  different  in 
fabric  and  colour  from  those  scarabs  of  Siptah,  but 
like  those  of  Tausert.  It  is  evident  that  this  is  a  stray 
scarab  of  the  large  batch  made  for  the  Tausert 
temple.  Unless  then  we  imagine  that  Siptah's 
deposit  was  opened  beneath  his  walls  to  insert  a 
later  scarab,  or  that  Tausert's  scarabs  were  made  in  a 
different  style  by  anticipation  and  kept  for  subsequent 
use  in  her  temple — either  of  which  suppositions 
would  be  very  wild  and  forced — we  must  grant  that 
a  stray  scarab  of  the  earlier  batch  made  for  Tausert 
had  been  left  over  at  the  factory  or  office  of  works 
and  was  put  in  with  the  later  batch  made  for  Siptah. 
The  style  of  the  Tausert  deposits  is  moreover 
certainly  intermediate  between  those  of  Ramessu  II, 


i6 


THE  TEMPLE  OF  SIPTAH. 


and  those  of  Siptah,  and  therefore  probably  before 
the  latter. 

We  are  led  therefore  to  see  that  Tausert  reigned 
alone  as  an  independent  queen,  and  that  later  on  the 
chief  seal-bearer  Bay  elevated  Siptah,  who  married 
Tausert  to  legitimate  his  position.  There  are  three 
scarabs  known  of  Tausert  as  queen,  one  in  Turin 
(mis-read  as  Ta  isit,  owing  to  being  broken,  Hist. 
Scarabs,  1998),  one  in  Mr.  MacGregor's  collection, 
and  one  which  I  exchanged  thence  to  my  own  series. 

The  whole  question  of  the  history  of  the  changes 
shown  in  the  successive  usurpations  of  tomb  XIV  in 
the  Tombs  of  the  Kings  will  have  to  be  re-studied  with 
this  new  evidence  in  hand.  If,  as  is  stated,  it  is  there 
shown  that  Tausert  alone  (in  the  form  there  shown) 
succeeded  Siptah  we  should  have  to  arrange  the 
history  thus,  ist  Tausert  alone,  copying  Ramessu  II. 
2nd  Tausert,  wife  of  Siptah.  3rd  Tausert  alone,  as 
royal  wife.  The  strange  cartouche  given  in  Lepsius' 
Denkmaler  iii  206  b  should  also  be  re-examined.  If 
it  is  much  restored  by  Lepsius  it  is  possible  that  it 
reads,  Sit-ra;  A  men  merysit  {ie.  Mery-amen,  sit-amen) ; 
the  latter  part  being  like  the  second  cartouche  on 
the  block  here  (XVII,  2).  Or  possibly  it  might  be 
copied  from  Siptah  and  x^zA,  AkJiet-ra ;  Amen-mery 
{Ra)  sit. 

CHAPTER  VII. 
THE  TEMPLE  OF  SIPTAH. 

34.  To  the  north  of  the  temple  of  Amenhotep  II, 
between  that  and  the  temple  of  Tahutmes  III,  is  a 
small  temple  site  of  closely  the  same  character  as 
that  of  Tausert.  As  I  walked  over  the  ground  I 
eyed  the  long  foundation  trenches  cut  in  the  gravel, 
and  filled  with  sand  ;  and  so  soon  as  we  had  finished 
the  site  of  Amenhotep  II,  we  attacked  this.  It 
proved  to  be  a  little  temple  of  just  the  same  work  as 
that  of  Tausert,  but  much  smaller.  The  foundation 
deposits  proved  it  to  be  of  Siptah,  her  husband. 

In  plan,  Pl.  XXVI,  the  temple  appears  not  to  have 
had  any  thick  pylon,  only  a  front  wall.  Inside  there 
were  apparently  two  hypostyle  halls.  The  first 
40  X  25  cubits,  had  four  rows  of  three  columns  each  ; 
the  second  two  ranks  of  four  columns.  A  few  store 
chambers  stood  at  the  sides.  Behind  this  was  the 
cella,  and  some  small  chambers  round  it.  The  whole 
was  on  a  very  modest  scale,  as  compared  with  the 
earlier  temples  ;  and  it  can  hardly  have  been  more  im- 
posing than  the  chapels  of  Uazmes  or  the  white  queen. 


35.  The  foundation  deposits  were  found  at  eight 
places,  analogous  to  those  of  Tausert ;  and,  like  those, 
there  were  none  found  to  the  east  of  the  main  cross 
wall,  across  the  middle  of  the  temple.  The  objects, 
shown  on  Pls.  XVII,  13-23,  and  XVIII,  were  not  so 
irregularly  placed  as  those  of  Tausert.  Some  definite 
rules  could  be  fixed  as  to  the  positions  of  the  blocks 
of  stone  with  cartouches  of  the  king  and  those  with 
the  name  of  the  Chancellor  Bay.  These  blocks 
were  always  face  up,  side  by  side,  with  bases  to  the 
east  and  tops  west ;  and  Siptah's  was  nearest  to  the 
corner,  with  Bay  next  to  it  away  from  the  corner. 
The  calf's  head  was  placed  on  or  off  the  stones,  any 
way  ;  the  haunch  was  on  or  off  the  stones,  any  way  ; 
the  mortars  were  always  upright,  and  close  around 
the  stones.  The  large  pans  of  pottery  were  at  a 
higher  level  and  put  on  the  inner  side  of  the  stones. 
The  small  glazed  objects  were  poured  out  upon  the 
stones  and  had  run  down  at  the  side. 

The  glazing  is  much  poorer  than  that  of  Tausert, 
and  is  of  a  dull  pea-green,  instead  of  the  brilliant 
indigo  blue.  The  workmanship  is  also  rougher  and 
more  careless.  The  plaques  (XVIII,  i,  2)  are  made  in 
two  pieces  like  those  of  Tausert ;  the  scarab,  3,  and 
the  square-ended  scarab,  4,  are  also  made  with  the 
back  and  face  separately.  Thin  gold-foil  plaques  also 
bear  the  cartouches  of  the  king  (8,  9).  Rings  are  far 
commoner  here  than  they  are  with  Tausert ;  they 
bear  the  cartouches  of  Siptah  (5,  6),  the  motto 
"  established  for  all  years  "  (7),  the  wish  "  Amen  open 
a  good  new  year"  (14),  and  a  multitude  of  figures  of 
gods  and  emblems  ij- 3S).  Besides  Siptah,  the 
great  Chancellor  Bay  also  appears  in  these  deposits ; 
thin  gold  foil  plaques  impressed  with  his  name  are 
found  (10),  also  rings  of  his  (11,  12)  and  .square-ended 
scarabs  of  his  (13).  The  ox  haunch  and  head  (36,  38) 
and  the  bound  ox  for  sacrifice  (37)  appear  here,  as 
with  Tausert ;  but  there  are  none  of  the  fishes,  ducks, 
and  flowers  which  were  made  before.  The  models  of 
tools  are  much  the  same  as  those  of  Tausert  (42-57) ; 
pieces  of  a  blue  glazed  vase  (39)  bear  the  name  of 
Siptah,  like  the  larger  blue  vases  with  the  Ramesside 
names  in  the  Louvre.  The  hemidisc  of  alabaster  (41) 
is  of  a  form  known  in  other  deposits.  A  similar  but 
larger  piece  was  produced  by  the  diggers  as  having 
been  found  between  deposits  III  and  VI  in  the 
foundations  of  Tausert :  as  it  bore  the  cartouche  of 
Ramessu  II  in  black  ink  I  felt  some  doubt  as  to 
their  good  faith,  and  have  not  included  it  among 
Tausert's  deposits. 

In  the  corners  of  Siptah's  foundations  were  placed 


LATER  OBJECTS  AND  GENERAL  PLAN. 


17 


pairs  of  blocks  of  sandstone  (XVII,  li,  12)  bearing 
the  cartouches  of  Siptah,  and  the  titles  and  name  of 
the  Chancellor  Bay,  whose  importance  at  this  period  is 
already  well  known  from  other  monuments.  Here  we 
find  him  acting  as  coequal  with  the  king  in  the 
founding  of  the  royal  temple.  The  deposit  VIII, 
which  had  been  exposed  by  denudation  and  scattered, 
is  doubtless  the  source  of  the  block  of  Siptah  which 
is  in  the  Marseille  museum,  described  by  Maspero  in 
his  catalogue  (1889)  as  No.  36  ;  in  size,  material,  and 
workmanship  it  is  identical  with  the  blocks  from  the 
temple.  In  the  deposits  were  many  rough  mortars 
and  pestles  of  sandstone  (15),  pairs  of  corn  grinders 
(13,  14),  rough  red-brown  pottery  jars  (18),  dishes 
(19,  20),  and  little  cups  (16,  17).  Tall  stands  for 
supporting  trays  (21,  22)  were  in  some  deposits,  and 
most  of  the  deposits  had  one  large  wine  jar  (23)  with 
inscription. 

The    actual    numbers    of  objects    found    are    as 
follows  : — 


Pl.  XVIII 
I 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 

7 
8 
Silver 

9 
10 

II,  12 
t3 
14 
15,  16 

17-20 
21 

22  . 

23  • 
24,  25 

26  . 

27  . 

28  . 

29  , 
30,  31.  32 
33 


34 
35 
36 
37 
38 
39 

40 


41     . 
42,43 

44  • 

45  • 

46,  47,  48 

49     ■     • 


3.  27 

6,2s 

I 


II 

4 

2 
II 

3 
II 
16 

3 
I 


92 
84 

93 


2 

3 

I 

7 
II 
II 

2 
10 


45 
31 
36 


10 
3 
4 

14 


I 

5 

4 

II 

19 


10 
2 


2 

28 
31 
23 


§.> 


a 


3 
3 
4 
6 

«9 
15 


I 
I 

4 

3 
I 

31 
21 

24 
I? 


3 

3 

10 

12 

37 
28 


5 

4 

lb 

5 
I 


14 
I 


I 

10 
I 

4 
I 

68 
52 
71 

agate 
lime- 
stone 


7 

6 

■3? 

's? 

•• 

40? 

18? 

18 

'i? 

4? 
2? 

/rings 
I  95 

rings 
37 

26 
26 
31 

47 
36 

agate 

quartz 

2 

92 

23 
40 

206 


126 


41 

12 
I 

rings 
262 


337 
283 

314 
I 


I 

2 

II 

3 

4 
14 


^ 

.s 

^ 

^ 

^ 

^ 

^ 

¥ 

1^ 

i> 

|> 

1^ 

i 
1° 

Q 

a 

Q 

Q 

A 

Q 

Q 

PL.     XVIII.— 

continued : — 

50     .      .      . 

2 

I 

. . 

4 

I 

8 

51     .      .      . 

5 

2 

7 

52     .      .      . 

9 

18 

H 

10 

5ii 

53     •     .     • 

8 

3 

3 

3 

4 

21 

54.  55    .     • 

2 

2 

I 

7 

56     .     .     . 

I 

57    •     •     . 

I 

I 

.. 

2 

Pl.  XVII.  :— 

II     .     .     . 

,  , 

I 

I 

I 

I 

6 

12     .     .     . 

,  , 

I 

I 

I 

I 

6 

13.  14    .     • 

.  . 

8 

12 

10 

n. 

4 

n. 

SO? 

15     .     .     . 

,  , 

8 

10 

10 

n. 

4 

n. 

SO.' 

18     ,     .     . 

5 

3 

2 

3 

20     .     .     , 

4 

I 

. . 

2 

23     .     .     . 

I 

I 

I 

I 

5 

Pl.  XVI  :— 

23     .     .      . 

•• 

•• 

•• 

•• 

•• 

I 

I 

2 

There  were  also  many  silver  foil  plaques,  as  8  to  10, 
indistinct  (11  in, I,  i  in  II,  8  in  IV, and  4  in  V) ;  4  in- 
distinct gold  foils,  and  a  copper  foil  in  I.  A  few  types 
of  rings  are  not  drawn,  as  the  scorpion,  frog,  crocodile, 
and  uaz  sceptre ;  in  IV  there  was  a  scarab  of  Tausert, 
and  some  hundreds  of  rough  chipped  beadsof  carnelian. 
The  depositVIII  was  all  broken  up  and  scattered  many 
years  ago,  and  the  block  of  Siptah  from  that  is  now  at 
Marseille.  There  does  not  appear  to  be  any  regularity 
in  the  numbers  of  various  objects  in  each  deposit,  and 
it  is  probable  therefore  that  the  glazed  things  were  all 
put  in  a  basket,  and  some  handfuls  of  the  mixed 
varieties  were  poured  out  on  the  cartouche  stones. 


CHAPTER  VIII. 
LATER   OBJECTS   AND    GENERAL  PLAN. 

36.  As  all  the  temples  which  have  been  here 
described  were  destroyed  soon  after  they  were  built, 
very  few  objects  of  later  date  were  found  in  them. 
This  history  was  different  from  that  of  the  Rames- 
seum,  which  for  stores  and  for  funeral  chapels 
continued  in  use  for  many  centuries.  A  small  altar 
of  offerings  came  from  the  Ramesseum  (VIII,  2) 
dedicated  to  Osiris  for  Du-se-nub.  The  lower  square 
of  inscription  is  on  the  edge  of  the  slab. 

Some  excellent  drawings  on  pottery  were  left 
behind  by  a  school  of  artists  in  the  Ramesseum  brick 
galleries.  A  girl's  head  has  been  very  carefully 
drawn  (VI,  14)  and  finished  off  with  red  cheeks  ;  but 
a  rival  student  took  it  up  and  added,  with  a  different 
brush,  the  dog  scratching  her  nose.  A  good  head  of 
a  king  below  appears  to  be  that  of  Ramessu  IV ;  and 
the  head  of  a  royal  sphinx  is  probably  of  the  same 

D 


I8 


LATER  OBJECTS  AND  GENERAL  PLAN. 


king.  Another  admirable  piece  of  rough  drawing 
was  found  in  the  brick  chambers  north  of  the  pylon 
of  Tahutmes  IV  (VI,  17) ;  it  shows  a  young  peasant 
going  out  on  his  way  in  the  world,  with  his  swag  on 
his  back,  the  delightful  gauche  rusticity  of  his  up- 
turned face  and  lank  hair  is  one  of  the  best  sketches  of 
character  that  has  been  found. 

37.  One  of  the  most  prominent  landmarks  of  the 
western  side  of  Thebes  is  a  piece  of  brick  wall  that 
stands  on  the  hill  between  the  temple  of  Tahutmes 
IV  and  the  great  scarp  around  the  temple  of  Tausert. 
This  wall  is  part  of  the  back  of  the  forecourt  of  a 
large  private  tomb,  the  plan  of  which  is  shewn  on 
Pl.  XXVI  as  the  tomb  of  Khonsuardus.  The 
three  tomb  wells  shown  in  the  three  back  chambers 
were  cleared  out  In  them  were  some  pieces  of 
painted  coffins.  The  better  and  earlier  was  finely 
written,  and  covered  with  clear  dark-brown  varnish  ; 
from  the  fragments  I  could  recover  the  name  of 
Khonsuardus,  goldsmith  of  the  temple  of  Amen.  The 
other  coffin  was  coarsely  painted  without  any  varnish, 
in  the  cold,  hard  style  of  the  early  XXVIth  dynasty, 
and  bore  the  name  of  Psamtek.  It  seems,  then,  that 
Khonsuardus  was  the  temple  jeweller  at  the  close  of 
the  XXVth  or  beginning  of  the  XXVIth  dynasty, 
and  a  son  of  his  was  buried  here  also  in  the  XXVIth 
dynasty.  Probably  the  wells  were  for  separate 
graves ;  but  the  chambers  have  been  all  broken 
through  below,  and  the  contents  broken  up  and 
mixed  together. 

38.  The  scarp  behind  the  temple  of  Tausert  is  cut 
through  the  thick  bed  of  coarse  Nile  gravels,  down  to 
the  level  of  a  bed  of  ancient  Nile  mud  below  them. 
While  that  mud  was  still  soft,  the  gravel  bed  has  slid 
down  several  feet  toward  the  Nile,  making  a  great 
slickenside  beneath  the  gravels,  and  leaving  large  gaps 
between  them  and  the  mud  below.  This  place 
offered  a  most  tempting  position  to  excavate  tombs, 
and  most  of  the  mud  bed  has  been  removed,  so  that 
the  upper  gravel  bed  has  very  little  support  left. 
These  tombs  vary  from  single  small  chambers,  to 
three  or  four  chambers  with  an  outer  court  wall.  The 
most  important  of  them  had  a  long  flight  of  steps, 
going  171  inches  horizontally,  and  steeply  inclined,  a 
doorway  at  the  bottom  opened  into  a  chamber 
114  X  86  inches,  from  which  opened  out  another 
chamber  104  x  92  inches.  We  cleared  out  nearly  all 
of  these  tombs,  but  only  found  a  few  amulets  and  a 
poor  set  of  canopic  jars  of  about  the  XXIIIrd 
dynasty.     One  tomb  was  filled  with  bones  of  oxen. 

39.  Just  below  the  scarp  north  of  Tausert's  temple, 


not  far  from  the  corner,  were  remains  of  a  brick 
chamber  built  against  the  face  of  the  cutting.  In  this 
were  found  many  iron  tools  and  some  bronze  objects. 
Beside  those  shewn  in  the  photograph,  PL.  XXI,  an 
important  piece  was  stolen  by  the  finder,  which  I  can 
only  describe  from  the  sight  of  it  which  a  friend  of 
mine  had  at  Thebes.  I  had  hoped  that  perhaps  the 
inspector  of  the  Department  of  Antiquities,  whom  we 
had  to  pay,  might  have  been  of  some  use  to  preserve 
things ;  but,  on  the  contrary,  he  was  on  the  most 
cordial  terms  with  the  dealers,  and  never  prevented 
anything  being  stolen.  The  trumpet  which  was 
taken  had  an  inscription  on  it,  "  Asar-hapi  gives  life  to 
Pekh-ar-Khonsu,  son  of  Du-amen-neb-nest-taui,  son 
of  Hor."  This  inscription  gives  the  best  indication 
that  we  have  as  to  the  date  of  these  things.  Hor 
and  Du-amen-neb-nest-taui  are  both  pretty  common 
names  during  two  or  three  centuries  before  the 
XXVIth  dynasty.  The  other  name  gives  a  still 
closer  indication,  as  it  is  not  so  common  ;  it  occurs  in 
this  form  (excepting  the  duck/  for  the  mat/)  in  a 
husband  of  a  woman  Shep  mut  (stele  Turin,  Lieblein, 
Diet.  Nom.,  1294)  ;  and  it  occurs  with  the  mat/,  as 
here,  on  a  bronze  vase  in  the  Louvre,  where  the  man  is 
son  of  a  Psemthek  (Pierret,  Inscr.  Louvre,  II,  121) ;  but 
in  no  case  has  the  name  the  seated  lioness  determina- 
tive to  pekh,  as  here.  These  instances  point  to  the 
end  of  the  XXVth  dynasty  (Shep-mut),  or  the  close  of 
the  reign  of  Psemthek  I.  As  the  name  Du-amen- 
neb-nest-taui  seems  hardly  so  late  as  the  XXVIth 
dynasty,  we  might  put  this  trumpet  to  somewhere 
between  680  and  630  B.C.,  or  possibly  anywhere 
within  the  Vllth  century. 

Turning  now  to  the  photograph  Pl.  XXI,  it  will  be 
seen  that  the  largest  object  is  a  bronze  helmet,  the 
form  of  which  is  wholly  un-Egyptian.  But  such  a 
helmet  is  constantly  found  on  the  Assyrian  sculptures 
of  the  Vlllth  century  B.C.  And  we  are  led  therefore 
to  look  to  the  Assyrian  occupation  of  Thebes  by 
Esarhaddon  between  672  and  670  B.C.  ;  the  later 
invasion  by  Nebuchadnezzar  a  century  afterwards  in 
572  B.C.  is  too  late  for  the  style  of  names  which  here 
occur.  The  bronze  bowl  below  the  helmet  is  of  a 
usual  form,  and  shows  nothing  further. 

40.  This  foreign  origin  for  these  things  is  confirmed 
when  we  look  at  the  iron  tools  and  see  that  they  are 
mostly  of  forms  which  were  unknown  to  the 
Egyptians.  Large  quantities  of  iron  tools  were 
found  at  Khorsabad,  and  were  therefore  probably  of 
about  700  B.C.,  or  the  first  half  of  the  Vllth  century, 
which  would  agree  to  the  common  use  of  iron  tools. 


LATER  OBJECTS  AND  GENERAL   PLAN. 


19 


as  here  indicated  about  670  B.C.,  by  the  Assyrian 
army.  When  we  remember  that  the  Chalybes  in  the 
highlands  of  Armenia  lived  by  iron-working  in  the 
time  of  Xenophon,  and  continue  still  to  make  iron  to 
the  present  day,  it  seems  that  we  there  see  the  most 
likely  direction  for  the  supply  of  the  iron  so 
abundantly  used  in  Assyria,  when  as  yet  it  seems  to 
have  been  unknown  to  the  Egyptians.  We  will  now 
notice  the  forms  of  these  tools  in  detail. 

The  sickle,  at  the  top  left  hand,  has  two  rivet-holes 
for  a  handle. 

The  mortise  chisel,  below  that,  has  a  slope  on 
either  face,  the  edge  view  being  shown  here ;  it  was 
evidently  for  use  with  a  mallet,  as  there  is  a  wide  stop 
or  flange  on  both  faces  to  prevent  it  being  driven  too 
deep  into  the  handle  ;  and  one  of  the  ferrules  seems 
by  the  size  to  belong  to  this. 

The  file,  between  the  chisel  and  sickle,  is  shaped 
like  a  very  thick-backed  knife,  hatched  all  over  both 
sides  by  cuts  from  a  chisel.  It  must  evidently  have 
been  used  as  a  file,  as  there  is  no  edge  for  it  to  cut 
with  as  a  knife  ;  but  it  is  the  earliest  stage  of  the 
triangular  saw-file,  when  only  two  faces  were  hatched 
across,  and  the  third  had  not  widened  out  equal  to  the 
others. 

The  rasp  at  the  bottom  left  hand  is  made  precisely 
like  a  modern  rasp  except  in  the  irregularity  of  the 
punching  ;  the  fiat  form,  thinning  out  to  the  end,  with 
a  good  tang,  but  no  flange,  and  squared-up  sides  and 
end,  shows  that  the  best  type  was  already  fixed  on 
in  this  earliest  example. 

The  crank  pieces  next  to  that  are  both  made  with 
the  long  ends  squared  to  fit  into  wood,  and  the  short 
ends  finished  to  a  conical  point.  As  there  are  several 
brace-bits  here,  it  is  evident  that  some  kind  of  a  brace 
was  probably  in  use ;  and  these  crank  pieces  seem 
certainly  to  have  been  fittings  for  a  brace  of  some  kind. 
How  it  was  arranged  we  cannot  yet  see,  in  the 
absence  of  any  of  the  woodwork. 

The  centre-bits  next  to  these  are  not  far  from  the 
types  of  modern  times,  and  are  almost  exactly  what 
are  now  used  by  the  Algerians.  The  two  edges  are 
alike  in  form,  both  being  scrapers,  and  are  not  differ- 
enced as  a  cutter  on  one  side  and  a  scraper  on  the 
other,  as  they  are  in  modern  tools.  The  square 
shank  is  evidently  for  fitting  them  interchangeably 
into  a  handle,  or  more  probably  a  brace. 

The  scoop  cutter  between  them  and  the  bowl  is  an 
admirable  tool  for  drilling  hard  wood  ;  the  twisted 
S-shaped  section  of  it  turns  the  edge  on  each  side 
forward  in  the  direction  of  cutting.     This  shows  that 


a  negative  rotation  was  used  in  work  ;  the  same  is 
shown  by  the  smaller  centre-bit,  while  the  larger 
centre-bit  was  for  positive  rotation,  as  modern  tools. 

On  the  right-hand  side  of  the  plate  are  two  chisels. 
The  wide  one  has  an  equal  slope  on  each  side ;  the 
large  oblong  ferrule  placed  with  it,  clearly  can  only 
belong  to  it,  and  proves  that  it  had  a  wooden  handle, 
and  was  not  a  hard  edge  for  an  anvil,  which  it 
resembles.  The  smaller  chisel  has  the  slope  all  on 
one  side,  like  a  modern  chisel  ;  and  it  is  narrow  in 
proportion  to  its  depth,  like  a  mortising  chisel.  The 
ferrule,  placed  above,  does  not  clearly  fit  any  of  the 
tools  here  ;  it  might  have  gone  on  either  the  rasp  or 
the  sickle  handle.  At  the  top  right  hand  is  a  small 
punch. 

The  saws  are  of  the  Eastern  type,  to  cut  when 
pulling  and  not  when  pushing.  There  is  no  appreci- 
able set  in  the  teeth  to  alternate  sides  in  order  to  clear 
the  way  in  cutting-;  but  the  rake  of  the  teeth  toward 
the  handle  is  obvious  in  the  longest  saw,  implying 
the  pulling  cut. 

As  an  approximate  test  of  the  softness  of  the  iron, 
the  question  of  magnetisation  was  tried,  using  a 
powerful  electro-magnet,  and  giving  a  blow  to  the  tool 
when  on  it,  and  again  when  off  it,  before  testing  by  a 
compass  needle.  The  result  was  that  the  two  crank 
pieces  were  quite  soft  iron.  The  very  wide  chisel 
was  soft  at  the  tang  and  the  greater  part  of  the 
length,  but  magnetised  at  the  edge.  The  rasp  and 
sickle  were  slightly  magnetised,  and  moderately 
hard.  The  three  saws,  the  two  mortise  chisels,  the 
file,  the  two  centre-bits,  the  scoop  drill,  and  the  little 
punch,  proved  to  be  all  of  them  permanently 
magnetised,  even  after  repeated  blows  in  different 
directions. 

41.  The  general  plan,  Pl.  XXII,  shows  the  relative 
positions  of  all  of  the  temples  described  here.  As 
the  exact  details  are  given  in  the  larger  plans  of  each 
site  separately,  the  small  plans  in  this  plate  have  been 
freely  restored,  where  the  symmetry  of  parts  showed 
what  must  have  existed.  These  are  therefore  the 
best  plans  for  comparison  together  to  observe  ques- 
tions of  arrangements  and  size.  The  exact  bearing 
of  each  temple  was  a  special  point  of  observation. 
To  ascertain  this,  a  long  line  was  adopted  running 
N.  and  S.,  defined  by  marks  on  a  brick  vault  of  the 
Ramesseum,  the  E.  face  of  the  high  wall  of  Khon- 
suardus,  and  a  wall  face  standing  up  against  the  sky 
line  at  Medinet  Habu.  Then  a  theodolite  was  set  up 
at  each  temple  site  exactly  in  this  sight  line,  and  the 
angle  between  the  sight  line  and  the  best  defined  line 

D  2 


20 


THE  INSCRIPTIONS. 


of  the  temple  ruin  was  obser\*ed.  In  the  evening  of 
the  same  day,  Polaris  and  Canopus  were  observed,  to 
ascertain  the  true  bearing  of  the  sight  line.  First 
taking  Polaris  twice,  and  Canopus  as  a  time  star 
between  the  two ;  and  then  reversing  every  part  of 
the  theodolite  (which  was  not  a  transit),  and  repeating 
these  three  observations.  This  gave  a  result  safe 
within  2',  and  much  more  exact  than  the  fixing  of 
the  temple  axes.  The  magnetic  variation  thus 
observed  was  4°  55'  W.  of  N.  on  16  Feb.,  1897. 

The  observed  axes  of  the  temples  have  all  had 
corrections  applied  to  them  to  reduce  from  the 
observed  line  to  the  best  mean  axis  in  each  case,  as 
measured  from  the  plans.  The  results  are  as  follows, 
arranging  them  in  the  order  of  the  azimuths  :  123° 
here  means,  123°  from  true  N.  round  by  E.,  or  33° 
S.  of  E. 

Merenptah     ....     about  1200  B.C.         123°  24'  ±  15' 

Tausert „      liSo   ,,  124°    7'  ±  20' 

TahutmesIV 1420   ,,  129°  55' ±  15' 

Siptah ,      1180  „  130°  57' ±30' 

Scarp  of  rock      ...  ?  131°    8' ±  30' 

Khonsoardos       ...       „        680  „  131°  15'  ±  30' 

Uazmes ,       1550   „  131°  32'  ±  10' 

Ramessu  II „       1280   „  132°  27'  ±     5' 

White  queen  ....  ?  133°    o'  ±    l° 

Ramessu  III 1180   „  137°  25' ±  15' 

Amenhotep  II.    .     .     .        ,,       1440   ,,  139°  19'  ±  20' 

These  have  a  very  great  value  for  the  question  of 
any  astronomical  reference  in  the  axes  of  temples. 
Here  is  a  group  of  ten  temples  and  chapels,  all  for 
one  purpose,  and  therefore  to  be  expected  to  point  to 
one  star ;  all  with  the  same  distant  horizon,  so  that 
uncertainties  cannot  come  in  from  that  cause,  and  all 
built  by  one  school  of  architects.  If  ever  we  could 
expect  to  find  the  astronomical  reference  in  any  case, 
it  should  be  in  such  a  series  of  connected  buildings. 
Yet  there  seems  no  trace  of  a  sequence  of  change  in 
direction  along  with  the  time.  The  dates  here  given 
go  to  and  fro  in  the  most  indifferent  fashion,  and 
show  no  connection  whatever  with  the  changes  of 
direction. 


CHAPTER  IX. 

THE  INSCRIPTIONS. 
By  Dr.  Wilhelm  Spiegelbbro. 

42.  Plate  I,  XVIIIth  Dynasty.  Fig.  i.  The 
signs  above  the  front  figure  probably  give  his  name, 
Aa  .  kheper  .  ka  .  ra  .  teku,  and  the  title  hen  .  ka 
"  the  ka  priest "  ;  but  this  is  not  quite  certain  in  the 
present  broken  state.     Perhaps  Uku  may  be  separate 


from  the  king's  name,  and  on  comparison  with  Fig.  2, 
where  the  compounded  royal  name  has  no  cartouche, 
this  is  the  more  likely.  It  might  be  asked  if  teku  is 
not  a  mistake  for  tekenu,  the  human  sacrifice  discussed 
with  much  insight  by  M.  Maspero  in  the  tomb  of 
Mentuhikhopeshef  (Mem.  Miss.  Arch.  Fr.  V  438  f.f ). 
Unfortunately  there  is  not  enough  of  the  scene  to 
show  if  it  was  one  of  human  sacrifice.  Fig.  2  shows  a 
priest  of  Amen,  and  a  man  named  Aa  .  kheper  .  ka  . 
ra  .  senb.  Both  pieces  are  evidently  from  one  tomb 
of  the  time  of  Tahutmes  I,  which  had  been  broken  up 
for  building  material  under  Tahutmes  IV. 

Fig.  3.  A  tablet  showing  a  woman,  Baket,  sacrificing 
to  "  Hathor  lady  of  heaven,  mistress  of  the  two 
lands."  Below  is  the  dedication,  with  some  ortho- 
graphic blunders,  to  "  Hathor,  lady  of  heaven,  mistress 
of  the  gods,  that  she  may  give  milk,  oxen,  geese,  and 
all  good  and  pure  things  to  the  ka  of  the  engraver  of 
Amen,  Amen  .  em.  .  Jiet.  His  beloved  wife,  the 
mistress  of  the  house,  Baket" 

Fig.  4.  Part  of  an  altar  inscribed  "  The  first  prophet 
of  Tahutmes  III,  Ra  says,  'Hail  to  thee  Ra  in  thy 
rising,  hidden  in  thy  setting.  Beautiful  in  thy  shining 
...  on  the  back  of  thy  mother.  Thou  shinest  as 
king  of  the  cycle  of  nine  gods.  Thou  makest  {dry 
\k  ?])  [life  ?]  to  every  one  (her  neb  ?).  The  goddess  of 
truth  embraces  thee  always.  Thou  courseth  through 
{nemtak)  the  heaven,  thy  heart  being  glad.     The  sea 

of  the  two  swords  has  become his  arms 

' "     The  prophet  named  here  is  known  also 

by  another  inscription  (L.D.  iii,  62b),  where  he  has  the 
titles  "high  priest  of  Amen  in  the  tomb-temple  of 
Tahutmes  III,  Ra"  (see  Spiegelberg  in  Rec.  Trav. 
xix,  ?,7). 

Fig.  5.  A  fragment  of  the  splendid  hard  limestone 
colossus  of  Amenhotep  in,  reading  "lord  of  the  lands 
in  .  .  .  ." 

Fig.  6.  Part  of  a  limestone  tablet  with  figures  of 
"  The  lady  of  the  house,  Nefret .  dri,"  "  His  daughter 

"  "  The  son  Pendua,"  "  His  son  Nen,"  "  His  son 

Pendeh\ii\et"  The  latter  name  means  " the  man  of 
the  goddess  Dehnet"  who  is  a  form  of  the  goddess  of 
the  Theban  necropolis,  Meritsegret. 

Fig.  7.  A  sandstone  tablet  with  Tahutmes  IV 
before  a  god,  probably  Amen.  The  end  of  inscrip- 
tion remaining  is  reddt  mu  "  giving  water,"  showing 
that  the  king  was  offering  water.  Below  is,  "  For  I 
have  settled  {gerget  na)  the  fortress  of  Tahutmes  IV 
among  the  tribes  of  Palestine  [with  everything]  his 

majesty  took  in  the  town  of  Qaza "     Perhaps 

"  Tahutmes  IV  among  the  tribes  of  Palestine  "  is  the 


THE  INSCRIPTIONS. 


21 


proper  name  of  the  fortress,  like  one  names  "  Tahut- 
mes  III  the  encloser  of  the  Sati  "  (Annals,  L.D.  iii,  32, 
line  21).  The  name  Qaza  .  .  .  might  be  conjectur- 
ally  restored,  Qa-za-ua-da-na  (Miiller,  Asien  tmd 
Europa,  335),  a  vassal  land  of  the  king  of  the  Khita  ; 
here  it  might  be  a  town  of  the  land  of  Qa-za-ua- 
da-na,  the  well-known  "  town  of  the  Kanaan "  is  a 
parallel  to  this. 

Fig.  8.  Sandstone  tablet  of  "  The  good  god 
Tahutmes  IV  endowed  with  life"  before  "Amen-Ra 
lord  of  heaven  "  offering  bread.  Amen  says,  "  I  have 
settled  the  vile  Kush,  I  have  guided  his  majesty  in 
his  victories."  If  the  construction  of  these  parallel 
inscriptions  is  treated  aright  here,  these  tablets  were 
dedicated  in  the  temple  of  Tahutmes  IV  in  honour  of 
his  victories  in  Syria  and  Ethiopia. 

43.  Plate  II,  Fig.  i.  Wooden  ushabti  of  Nehi, 
the  well-known  viceroy  of  Ethiopia,  under  Tahutmes 
III,  with  the  usual  text,  "  O,  thou  figure,  if  the  viceroy 
of  Ethiopia  Nehi  is  ordered  to  do  works  that  are  done 
there  in  the  nether  world  as  it  is  his  duty  (?),  to 
cultivate  the  fields,  to  irrigate  the  banks,  to  carry  the 
sand  of  the  east  to  the  west,  [say]  I  am  here !  " 

Fig.  2.  Part  of  an  ushabti  figure  (?)  inscribed, 
"  [Lord]  of  the  two  lands,  Tahutmes  I,  beloved  of 
Amen  of  Karnak." 

Fig.  3  is  an  alabaster  figure  of  Amenhotep  II  from 
his  temple. 

Plate  III,  Figs,  i,  2,  3,  5.  "The  good  god  Amen- 
hotep II,  beloved  of  Amen." 

Fig.  4.  "The  good  god  Amenhotep  II,  endowed 
with  life." 

Fig.  19.  Part  ot  a  glazed  tube  gives  to  Amen- 
hotep III  the  title,  "  beloved  of  the  cycle  of  nine 
gods  of  the  royal  jubilees."  This  jubilee  is  named 
also  on  Figs.  14  ("great  in  jubilees"),  15  ("rich  in 
jubilees"),  and  16,  18. 

Fig.  23.  Wine  stamp  of  limestone,  reading,  "  Wine 
of  the  west  river,"  that  is,  the  Canopic  branch  of  the 
Nile.     (Brugsch.  Geog.  88). 

Fig.  24.  A  stamp  cut  in  pottery  reading,  "  House 
of  Aten." 

Fig.  25.  "Aa  .  kheperu  .  ra  shining  upon  the  throne 
of  Ra."  This  scarab  was  probably  made  in  honour  of 
the  coronation  day  of  Amenhotep  II,  for  kha  seems 
— amongst  other  meanings — to  be  used  for  the 
enthronement  of  a  king. 

Fig.  26.  Prenomen  of  Amenhotep  III. 

Fig.  27.  "  The  divine  wife  of  Amon  .  .  ." 

44.  Plate  V.  Fig.  5.  "Amenhotep  11."  Fig.  6. 
"  Year  26,  Vine  dresser  Pinehas." 


Plate  VIII.  Fig.  i.  Piece  of  a  rude  stele,  with 
"  the  good  god  Tahutmes  IV  "  adoring  a  Syrian  war 
goddess  on  horseback.  I  should  be  inclined  to  think, 
from  existing  indications,  that  this  is  the  goddess 
Asit  (Miiller,  Asien  iind  Europa,  316). 

Fig.  2.  Table  of  offerings.  Left  hand,  "  Offering 
which  the  king  gives  to  Osiris  Khentamenti,  the 
Great  God,  Lord  of  Abydos,  that  he  may  give  all 
offerings,  all  provisions,  all  good  and  pure  things  to  the 
Osiris  Tas-nub,  the  deceased."  Right  hand,  "  Offering 
which  the  king  gives  to  Osiris  Un-nefer  the  Great 
God,  the  Prince  of  Eternity,  that  he  may  give  all 
offerings,  all  provisions,  and  all  good  and  pure  things 
to  the  ka  of  the  Osiris  Tas-nub  the  deceased."  Below 
is  the  full  title,  "  The  Osiris,  singer  of  the  harim  {hes 
khenu)  Tas-nub."  Usually  the  title  is  singer  of  the 
harim  of  Amen,  and  that  might  be  lost  in  the  erasure, 
if  written  with  n  in  an  oval.  As  this  title  only  occurs 
in  this  orthography  between  the  XXIInd  and  XXVIth 
dynasty,  so  fjar  as  I  know,  it  would  give  an  approxi- 
mate age  for  the  tablet. 

Fig.  3.  A  tablet,  found  in  the  temple  of  Merenptah, 
"  made  by  the  watchman  of  the  temple  of  millions  of 
years  (the  Ramesseum)  Pen-rannut,  the  deceased,  of 
Thebes,"  who  adores  "the  able  spirit  of  Ptah-hes" 
who  is  seated  before  him. 

Fig.  4.  Tablet  held  by  a  kneeling  figure,  in  grey 
granite,  "  Praise  to  Ra  in  [his]  rising  .  .  .  till  his  setting 
in  the  west,  [by]  the  royal  scribe  Sesh  (or  Nai),  the 
deceased.  [I]  come  to  thee,  praised  be  thy  beauties 
(read  nefruk)  .  .  .  praised  be  thy  soul  always 
(r  tend),  grant  [me]  to  be  in  the  nether  world 
every  day." 

45.  Plate  IX.  Fig.  i.  Limestone  tablet,  reused  in 
the  buildings  of  the  forecourt  of  Tahutmes  IV.  "  An 
offering  which  the  king  gives  to  Osiris  Khentamenti, 
the  Great  God,  Lord  of  the  Necropolis,  that  he  may 
give  the  funeral  sacrifice  of  bread,  beer,  oxen,  geese, 
linen  cloths,  vegetables,  oil,  thousands  of  all  good 
and  pure  things,  offerings,  provisions,  liquids,  and  all 
vegetables,  which  the  heaven  gives,  the  earth  creates, 
and  the  Nile  brings  out  of  his  source ;  [that  he  may 
give]  the  sweet  wind  of  the  north,  and  the  drink  from 
the  whirlpool  (?)  of  the  river  to  the  ka  of  the  follower 
of  his  word  on  water  and  on  land,  in  the  foreign  lands 
of  the  south  and  of  the  north.  The  fighter  against 
the  lands  of  the  barbarians,  who  chastises  every  one 
who  is  revolting  against  the  king  in  the  land  of  the 
Retenu,  filling  the  heart  of  the  Good  God,  Athu-usir. 
He  says,  '  O,  you  living  ones  on  earth,  every  priest, 
every  scribe,  every  reciter  who  beholds  this  statue,  tlie 


23 


THE   INSCRIPTIONS. 


image  of  my  body  upon  earth,  remember  .  .  .'  "  The 
text  ceasing  here  may  have  been  continued  on  the 
lost  part  below,  with  perhaps  the  meaning  "  remember 
my  name,  and  say  the  dedicatory  formula  of 
offerings."  A  rather  similar  address  occurred  at 
Koptos  (see  "  Koptos "  PL.  XVIII,  3.  p.  17).  The 
inscription  of  the  lesser  figure  shows  that  the  stele 
was  dedicated  to  Athu-asar  "  by  his  beloved  son,  who 
makes  his  name  to  live,  the  stable-master  of  the  Lord 
of  the  two  lands  Min-mes,  renewing  the  life,  the 
vassal  of  Osiris."  The  style  of  the  work,  which 
retains  the  traditions  of  the  middle  kingdom,  gives 
the  date  as  being  early  in  the  XVIIIth  dynasty. 

Fig.  2.  The  inscription  from  the  back  of  the  white 
bust  of  the  queen  (PL.  VI,  3,  4)  refers  in  the  first  line 
to  several  dignities  in  the  harim  of  some  gods.  These 
offices  are  denoted  by  the  names  of  instruments,  as  is 
shown  by  the  title  sesheshy\i\  en  Mut,  "  the  player  of 
the  sistrum  of  Mut."  (This  title  "  shesh  shyt "  occurs 
among  those  of  queen  Titi,  see  De  B.ouge,  Inscr. 
Hist  249).  Probably  therefore  the  other  titles  are  of 
similar  nature.  With  sesheshet  are  sometimes  named 
other  instruments,  menat  and  sekliem  (Erman,  Pap. 
Westcar,  p.  61),  though  the  latter  reading  is  doubtful, 
but  based  on  the  demotic  papyrus  of  Leiden  I,  384 
8132.  The  men  at  the  close  of  the  first  line  may 
have  been  menyt,  and  the  title  before  Amen-Ra  may 
have  been  the  office  composed  with  the  sekhem.  So 
I  should  translate — 

"The  ....  playeress  of  Amen  Ra,  the  sistrum 
playeress  of  Mut,  the  menat  playeress  of  [Khonsu] 
....  Sais,  the  danceress  (aheb[et])  of  Horus  .  .  .  ." 
If  this  view  of  the  reconstruction  of  the  text  is  right, 
the  queen  had  among  other  titles  those  of  a  lady  of 
the  harim  of  the  Theban  Triad.  Unfortunately  there 
is  nothing  in  the  inscription  to  reveal  the  name  of  the 
queen. 

Fig.  3.  This,  and  the  following  up  to  Fig.  20, 
depend  upon  Prof.  Petrie's  hand  copies,  as  I  have  not 
seen  the  originals.  Figs.  3  to  9  are  inscriptions  upon 
the  bases  of  the  colossal  jackals  which  formed  the 
avenue  of  approach  to  the  temple  of  Amenhotcp  III. 
Fig.  3  reads  " ....  his  inheritance,  his  kingdom 
[and]  his  throne,  realising  what  he  was  doing  in  the 
land.  His  companion  as  king  of  the  living.  The 
two  lands  of  Horus  are  under  the  direction  ('  plan ' 
or  '  design ')  of  the  Lord  of  the  two  lands  Neb-maat- 
ra  .  .  .  .  slaying  the  tribes  of  the  Sati,  the  good  God 
the  brilliant  image  of  Ra,  shining  like  the  sun's  disc, 
Horus  of  the  gods  (or  '  amongst  the  gods,'  but  this 
orthography  of  nuter  would  be  very  unujual  at  this 


time)  with  variegated  feathers  (?),  for  he  has  embraced 
the  two  lands  with  his  wings,  the  son  of  Ra,  Lord  of 
the  sword,  Amenhotep  prince  of  Thebes  .  .  .  ." 

Fig.  4,  "  Great  (?)  in  knowledge,  there  is  nothing 
he  does  not  know  in  heaven  and  earth,  giving  rule  to 
the  Spirits,  who  go  forth  at  the  sign  of  his  eyes 
(?  reading  semed  n  drtif[t])  the  king  of  Upper  and 
Lower  Egypt  Neb-maat-[ra]  ....  The  golden 
Horus,  great  by  the  sword,  slaying  the  Sati.  The 
southerners  are  coming  to  him  on  their  bellies,  the 
northerners  on  account  of  the  power  of  his  spirits. 
No  land  stays  behind  him  (ignores  him  ?).  The  son 
of  Ra,  Amenhotep.  .  .  ." 

Fig.  5.  "...  .  great  in  vigour  he  has  made  [it]  by 
his  arms  like  the  Lord  of  Thebes  (Amen)  .... 
slaying  the  Sati,  not  .  .  .  ." 

Fig.  6.  "  [Neb]  maat  [Ra],  heir  of  Ra,  beloved  of 
Amen  Ra,  endowed  with  life." 

Fig.  7.  ".  .  .  .  fluid  of  life,  firmness,  purity  (?), 
health,  gladness." 

Fig.  8.  ".  .  .  .  in  placing  his  fear  amongst  the 
hidden  ....  his  terror  is  going  through  the  lands, 
acting  by  his  arms,  making  the  two  lands  know  the 
king  of  Upper  and  Lower  Egypt,  Lord  of  the  sword, 
Neb-maat-ra  ....  slaying  the  Sati,  overthrowing 
in  all  lands  those  who  rebel  against  him,  making 
foreign  lands  to  be  heaps  of  corpses,  wounding  (?) 
them,  the  terror  of  him  is  amongst  all  foreign  lands, 
the  son  of  Ra,  Amen[hotep]." 

Fig.  9.  "  [Neb]  maat  [Ra],  image  of  Ra,  beloved 
of  Amen,  endowed  with  life."  "  Amenhotep,  prince 
of  Thebes,  beloved  of  Amen  in  eternity."  "  The  fluid 
of  life,  firmness,  purity,  health,  and  gladness  supports 
him  like  Ra  every  day  in  eternity."  ".  .  .  .  son  of 
Ra,  beloved,  endowed  with  life."  ".  .  .  ,  beloved  of 
[Nehbet]-kau  (?)  like  Ra." 

Figs.  10-24.  These  graffiti  are  painted  on  the 
blocks  of  building  stone,  as  masons'  marks  ;  they  are 
not  all  comprehensible,  and  I  only  state  what  seems 
to  me  fairly  clear.  Figs.  11,  12,  bear  the  name  of 
a  building  of  "the  town"  or  "the  south  city" 
(Thebes) ;  with  ani/i  uas  added,  which  elsewhere 
means  the  king's  palace  (Rec.  Trav.  xix.  89,  3).  The 
first  two  signs  may  be  the  name  of  the  building, 
perhaps  of  the  temple  of  Tahutmes  IV,  where  this 
was  found.  Fig.  1 3  reads  nefer  renplt,  "  good  years," 
which  I  noticed  also  on  blocks  of  the  temple  at  Deir 
El  Babri.  It  may  be  the  name  of  a  man.  Fig.  24 
reads  "  position  of  filling,"  that  is,  the  level  of  the 
sand  filling  of  the  foundation.  It  was  written  on  a 
large   pebble   in    the  side  of  the  foundation    trench 


THE  INSCRIPTIONS. 


23 


of  Tausert's  temple ;  a  longer  example  of  such 
inscription  will  appear  amongst  the  ostraca  of  the 
Ramesseum. 

Figs.  14  to  18,  21,  and  unnumbered  piece  25. 
These  are  the  most  interesting  of  the  graffiti,  and  the 
latter  ones  give  the  key  to  the  others.  They  read 
"  the  great  one  of  the  mercenaries  of  the  right  hand 
Huy."  We  know  from  the  papyrus  of  Tanis  that 
there  was  a  separation  of  troops  into  right  {unami) 
and  left  {semhi)  classes ;  and  there  it  is  very  likely, 
as  Horrack  (Rev.  Arch.  1862  ii,  268)  and  Brugsch 
(Acgyptologie  221)  have  observed,  that  a  remem- 
brance of  this  organization  is  implied  by  Herodotos 
when  he  states  (II,  30)  that  Asmakh  (or  Askham) 
means  "  those  that  stand  at  the  left  hand  of  the 
king."  This  division  into  right  and  left  appears  also 
in  the  organization  of  the  workmen  of  the  Theban 
necropolis  (e.g.  Pap.  Turin  VII,  10),  and  is  shown 
here  by  the  title  in  the  graffiti  14  to  18.  It  seems 
quite  possible  that  the  marks  unami,  right,  and  semhi, 
left,  refer  also  to  this  military  organization.  In  the 
fig.  20  the  dates  have  been  added  "  12th  of  4th  month 
of  inundation  "  and  10  +  x  of  the  same ;  the  black 
lines  are  written  upside  down  to  the  red.  To  under- 
stand these  graffiti  we  must  remember  that  the 
necropolis  of  Thebes  had  several  forts  with  garrisons, 
such  are  often  named  in  business  papers  (Spiegelberg, 
Arbeiter  ....  unter  den  Ramessiden).  These 
garrisons  may  well  have  been  near  the  funerary 
temples,  which  we  know  had  their  troops.  May  then 
these  marks  "  right "  and  "  left "  have  indicated  the 
place  of  the  soldiers,  in  the  temple  fortifications  of  the 
funerary  temple  of  Merenptah,  where  they  were  found  ? 

46.  Plate  X,  Limestone  Stele  of  Amen- 
HOTEP  III.  This  sculpture  has  been  intentionally 
defaced  in  all  parts  relating  to  the  god  Amen,  and 
then  subsequently  restored  by  Sety  I.  At  the  top 
under  the  solar  disc,  with  wings  and  uraei,  is  twice 
repeated  "The  god  of  Edfu  (Horus)  the  great  god, 
he  gives  life  and  purity."  Between  the  uraei  is  the 
cartouche  Neb-maat-ra.  Below  this  the  whole  is 
divided  into  two  scenes,  each  with  a  standing  figure 
of  "  Amen-ra,  lord  of  heaven,  he  gives  all  life  and  all 
health,"  who  receives  the  offerings  of  the  king.  On 
the  right  side  the  incised  inscription  (restored)  states 
"  Restoring  of  the  monument  made  by  the  son  of  Ra 
Sety  Merenptah  (Sety  I)  for  his  father  Amen."  The 
restored  parts  are  the  figures  of  Amen,  the  names  of 
Amen,  the  cartouches  of  Amenhotep  in  the  lower 
.scenes,  and  the  restoration  inscription.  The  names 
of  offerings  before  the  king  are  probably  original. 


Right  Side.  Above  the  king  is  "The  good  god, 
lord  of  the  two  lands,  Neb-maat-ra  son  of  Ra,  his 
beloved  [Amenhotep,  prince  of  Thebes]  gifted  with 
life  like  Ra."  Below  is  "  Offering  of  wine  to  Amen  ; 
may  he  give  the  gift  of  life." 

Left  Side.  Above  the  king  is  "  The  Good  God,  lord 
of  the  two  lands  Neb-maat-ra  son  of  Ra,  of  his  body 
[Amenhotep,  prince  of  Thebes]  lord  of  the  diadems, 
beloved  of  Ra."  Below  is  "  Giving  truth  to  the  lord 
of  the  gift  of  life  (?)." 

Lower  Part.  Right  Side.  Amenhotep  triumphing 
in  his  chariot  over  the  negroes.  "The  Good  God 
[Lord  of  the  foreigners]  master  of  the  sword,  strong 
in  binding  them,  who  ruins  the  offspring  of  the  vile 
Kush,  guiding  her  chiefs  as  living  prisoners  by  the 
power  of  his  father  Amen."  There  are  some  curious 
forms  of  signs  (as  seger  and  sar),  and  a  brevity  of 
orthography  caused  by  the  short  space  available. 

Left  Hand.  Amenhotep  triumphing  in  his  chariot 
over  the  Syrians.  "The  Good  God,  the  golden 
Horus,  shining  in  truth,  beautiful  (?)  like  the  sunrise, 
great  in  power,  mighty  in  terror,  firm  of  heart  like 
he  who  is  in  Thebes  (Amen)  prostrating  Nehereni 
with  his  victorious  sword."  If  it  be  correct  to  give 
the  sign  of  the  horse  the  value  nefer,  which  it  has  in 
Ptolemaic  times,  it  would  be  of  interest  to  find  it 
thus  early  under  Amenhotep  III.  We  know  that 
the  germs  of  the  Ptolemaic  system  are  to  be  found 
long  before  their  development,  as  in  the  writing  of 
mesdemt  in  the  Ebers  papyrus  (26,  18). 

At  the  base  ".  ...  all  foreign  (?)  lands,  all  men 
{rekhyt),  all  beings  {hnememet),  Nehreni,  the  vile 
Kush,  the  Upper  and  Lower  Rethenu,  are  at  the  feet 
of  this  good  god  like  Ra  in  eternity." 

47.  Plates  XI,  XII,  Great  Stele  of  Amen- 
hotep III.  At  the  top  is  the  solar  disc  with  wings 
and  uraei,  and  on  either  side  "The  god  of  Edfu 
(Horus),  the  great  god,  lord  of  heaven."  Between  the 
uraei  is  the  cartouche  of  Neb-maat-ra.  Down  the 
middle  is  "  Restoring  of  the  monument  made  by  the 
king  of  Upper  and  Lower  Egypt  Men-maat-ra 
(Sety  I)  for  his  father  Amen-ra  king  of  all  gods."  This 
p/oves  the  restoration  by  Sety  after  the  erasures  of 
Amen  by  Akhenaten.  The  restored  parts  are  the 
figures  and  names  of  Amen,  the  whole  of  the  first  21 
lines,  parts  of  7  lines  lower,  and  the  names  of  Amen 
in  the  lowest  3  lines. 

Right  Hand.  The  king  is  standing,  "  Offering 
libation  to  Amen  that  he  may  give  the  gift  of  life." 
Above  is  "The  Good  God,  lord  of  the  two  lands, 
Neb-maat-ra,  Son  of  Ra,  lord  of  the  diadems,  Amen- 


24 


THE  INSCRIPTIONS. 


hotep  prince  of  Thebes.  Great  [by  his]  monuments, 
multiplying  wonders,  beloved  by  Amen,  gifted  with 
life."  Over  Amen  is  "  I  have  given  to  thee  all 
life  and  purity  which  is  with  me  ;  I  have  given  to 
thee  all  joy  of  heart  which  is  with  me,  Amen  Ra, 
lord  of  heaven." 

Left  Hand.  The  king  is  standing,  "  Offering  wine 
to  Amen,  that  he  may  give  the  gift  of  life."  Above 
is  "  The  Good  God,  Lord  of  the  two  lands,  Neb-maat- 
ra :  son  of  Ra,  lord  of  the  diadems,  Amenhotep  prince 
of  Thebes  ;  Image  of  Ra  in  the  two  lands,  elected  by 
himself,  beloved  of  Amen,  gifted  with  life."  Over 
Amen  is  "  I  have  given  to  thee  all  health  which  is  in 
me  ;  I  have  given  to  thee  all  vigour  which  is  in  me, 
Amen-Ra,  prince  of  Thebes." 

Below  this  is  the  long  inscription  here  translated. 
As  the  text  and  commentary  will  soon  be  published 
in  the  Recueil  des  Travaux,  only  the  simple  translation 
is  here  given. 

Introduction  (Protocol,  Lines  1-2). 

I'  Horus  lives,  the  strong  bull,  brilliant  with  truth, 
the  Unifier  of  both  diadems,  he  who  establishes  the 
laws  and  calms  both  lands,  the  Golden-Horus,  great 
in  power,  he  who  smites  the  Asiatics,  the  King  of 
Upper  and  Lower  Egypt,  Neb-maat-Ra,  the  Son  of 
the  Sun  Amenlwtep  tlie  Prince  of  Thebes,  beloved  by 
Amon  of  Kamak,  the  chief  god  in  Apet,  gifted  with 
life,  whose  heart  rejoices,  ruling  both  lands  like  Ra 
for  ever  |"  the  gracious  god,  the  lord  of  joy  of  heart, 
he  who  watches  over  him  who  formed  him,  Amen, 
the  king  of  the  gods,  he  who  makes  his  house  great, 
he  who  makes  his  beauty  content  by  doing  what  his 
ka  loves.  Thus  his  Majesty  deigned  to  make  very 
great  monuments.  Never  occurred  the  like  since  the 
creation  of  the  world. 

Tlie  Temple  of  Amenhotep  III  upon  the  West  Bank 
of  Thebes  (lines  3-10). 

He  made  them  |3  as  his  monument  for  his  father 
Amen,  the  Lord  of  Karnak,  making  him  a  glorious 
house  of  the  gods  in  the  west  of  Thebes,  a  fortress 
of  Eternity  for  eternity,  of  beautiful  light-coloured 
sandstone,  adorned  (?)  all  over  with  gold  ;  its  floor  is 
inlaid  with  silver,  |*  all  its  doors  with  electron,  large 
and  very  great,  splendid  for  ever,  and  ornamented 
with  this  very  great  monument,  with  many  royal 
statues  of  granite  from  Elephantine,  of  wonderful 
stones,  and  all  kinds  of  precious  |5  stones,  finished  as 
works  of   eternity.      Its    height   shines    up   to  the 


heaven,  its  rays  fall  into  the  faces  as  the  Sun  when 
he  shines  in  the  early  morning.  It  (i.e.,  the  temple) 
is  provided  with  a  Stele  of  the  King,  which  is  adorned 
with  gold  and  many  precious  stones.  The  |*  masts 
are  erected  before  it  adorned  with  electron.  It  is 
like  the  horizon  of  the  sky  when  Ra  rises  in  it.  Its 
sea  is  full  like  the  high  Nile,  the  Lord  of  the  fish  and 
the  birds  pure  in  .  .  .  ,  its  store-house  is  full  of  male 
and  feniale  slaves  |'  of  the  children  of  the  princes  of 
all  lands,  which  his  Majesty  has  captured.  Its  store- 
houses contain  beauties  without  number.  Its  maga- 
zines are  surrounded  by  Syrian  settlements,  which 
are  settled  by  the  children  of  princes.  Its  cattle  are 
I*  like  the  sand  on  the  seashore,  its  black  oxen  are 
millions  from  South  and  North  Egypt.  (?)  There  his 
Majesty  took  counsel  with  himself  Q)  like  Ptah,  with 
skilful  mind,  like  him  in  the  Southwall,  planning 
favours  for  his  father  Amen-ra  king  of  the  gods,  since 
he  made  him  |9  a  very  great  Pylon  before  the  face  of 
Amon.  His  beautiful  name,  which  his  majesty  had 
given,  is  "  Amon  has  received  his  bark  of  the  gods  " 
[All  this  is]  a  resting-place  of  the  Lord  of  the  Gods 
at  the  valley  festival  at  the  procession  of  Amon  in 
the  West,  when  he  looks  upon  the  gods  of  the  West, 
that  he  may  reward  |'°  his  Majesty  with  life  and 
purity. 

The  Temple  of  Luxor  (lines  10-16). 

King  Amenhotep  III  who  awakens  (?)  content- 
ment with  the  works  of  his  father  Amen  Ra,  the 
Lord  of  Karnak  in  the  southern  Apet,  made  of 
beautiful  light-coloured  sandstone,  large  and  very 
great,  |"  increasing  its  beauty.  Its  walls  are  of 
electron,  its  floor  of  silver,  all  doors  are  adorned 
with  .  .  .  ,  its  pylons  reach  to  the  sky,  they  join 
themselves  with  the  stars.  When  men  see  them,  |" 
they  praise  his  Majesty.  The  King  Neb-maat-Ra 
has  appeased  the  heart  of  his  father  Amen  of  Karnak. 
To  him  every  land  is  delivered,  the  Son  of  the  sun 
Amenhotep,  the  ruler  of  Thebes,  the  splendour  of 
Ra.  .  .  .  His  majesty  made  another  monument  for 
his  father  Amen,  he  made  him  a  castle  (?)  as  an 
offering  before  the  face  of  the  southern  Apet,  |''  a 
place  of  recreation  for  my  father  at  his  beautiful 
festival.  I  have  erected  {saha)  a  great  temple  in  its 
interior  (?)  {khenu),  like  Ra  when  he  rises  in  the 
mountain  of  the  Sun.  It  (i.e.,  the  temple)  is  planted 
with  all  kinds  of  beautiful  flowers.  Nu  is  in  its  lake 
at  all  seasons  |'^  It  has  more  wine  than  water,  even 
as  the  Nile  flows,  the  son  of  the  lord  of  eternity 
(i.e.,  Osiris),  who  is  rich,  the  seat  which  receives  the 


C 


THE  INSCRIPTIONS. 


25 


tributes  (?)  of  all  lands,  many  gifts  are  brought  before 
my  father  as  tribute  of  all  lands.  He  has  given  to 
me  the  lords  of  the  lands  of  the  south,  |'5  the  inhabi- 
tants of  the  south,  and  those  of  the  north.  Each  is 
joined  to  his'  neighbour.  Their  silver,  their  gold, 
their  cattle,  and  all  kinds  of  precious  stones  of  their 
lands  are  in  millions,  hundreds  of  thousands,  tens  of 
thousands,  and  thousands.  I  have  made  it  for  my 
begetter  in  loyalty  of  heart  (?)  even  as  |"*  he  made 
me  the  Sun  of  the  peoples  of  the  Nine  Bows  (bar- 
barians), the  King  of  Upper  and  Lower  Egypt,  Neb- 
maat-ra,  the  image  of  the  Sun,  the  Son  of  the  Sun, 
Amenhotep  the  Prince  of  Thebes. 

Temple  of  Karnak  (lines  16-23). 

I  built  another  monument  for  my  begetter  Amon 
Ra  in  Karnak,  who  is  firm  on  his  throne,  making  him 
a  great  bark  on  the  stream  (with  the  name)  "  Amen 
Ra  is  in  the  User-hat,"  [even  a]  bark  of  new  |'7 
cypress  wood  which  his  Majesty  had  felled  {shad)  in 
the  land  of  the  god,  and  which  has  been  drawn  by 
the  princes  of  all  lands  from  the  mountains  of 
Retennu,  very  large  and  great.  Never  was  anything 
like  (it)  done.  Its  body  (i*)  is  inlaid  with  silver,  and 
adorned  |'^  all  over  with  gold.  The  holy  of  holies 
(Naos)  is  of  electron,  and  fills  the  whole  earth.  Its 
bows  ....  they  unite  the  great  atf  crowns.  Its 
snakes  are  on  its  sides.  They  are  furnished  with 
talismans  behind  themselves  |'9.  The  masts  are  made 
firm  opposite  it  (i.e.,  the  holy  of  holies),  adorned 
with  electron,  two  great  obelisks  stand  between  them. 
It  is  altogether  beautiful.  The  spirits  of  Pe  exult 
before  it,  the  spirits  of  Nechen  praise  it.  The  gods 
of  the  inundation  of  the  north  and  south  |^°  embrace 
its  beauty.  Nu  causes  its  bow  to  shine  as  the  sun's 
disk  shines  in  heaven,  in  order  to  make  its  beautiful 
procession  at  his  (i.e.,  Amen's)  festival  of  Apet,  at 
its  procession  to  the  west  of  millions  of  millions  of 
years.  The  King  Amenhotep  III  |^'  who  watches  over 
the  glory  of  the  King  (lit.  "  to  seek  the  brightness  of 
the  King  "),  has  built  another  monument  of  Amen, 
making  a  very  large  pylon  for  him,  before  the  face  of 
Amen  Ra  of  Karnak,  adorned  all  over  with  gold. 
The  shadow  of  the  god  is  like  a  ram  (?)  set  with  real 
lapislazuli,  adorned  with  gold,  and  with  many  precious 
stones.  Never  was  the  like  made  |^^  Its  floor  is 
inlaid  with  silver,  the  gates  opposite  it  stand  firm. 
The  steles  are  of  lapislazuli,  one  on  each  side.  Its 
pylons  reach  up  to  the  sky,  and  the  four  pillars  of 
the  sky.    Its  flag-masts  shine  up  to  the  sky  ^^  adorned 


with  electron.  His  majesty  brought  the  gold  for  it 
from  the  land  of  Karoi,  during  his  first  victorious 
campaign,  when  he  beat  the  wretched  Ethiopian,  the 
King  of  Upper  and  Lower  Egypt,  Neb  maat  Ra,  the 
favourite  of  Ra,  the  Son  of  the  Sun,  Amen-hotep,  the 
Prince  of  Thebes. 

Temple  of  Soleb  (lines  23-25). 

I  built  other  monuments  for  Amen.  Its  |'-»  like  has 
not  been  made.  I  built  thee  thy  house  of  millions  of 
years  on  the  estate  (?)  of  Amon  Ra  of  Karnak,  Kha- 
em-maat,  the  sublime  of  electron,  the  place  of  repose 
of  my  father  at  all  of  his  festivals,  which  is  excellently 
made  of  beautiful  light-coloured  sandstone,  orna- 
mented all  over  with  gold  |=s.  The  ornaments  of  its 
floor  are  of  silver,  all  its  gates  of  gold.  Two  great 
obelisks  are  erected,  one  on  each  side,  between  which 
my  father  rises.  I  am  in  his  suite  |**.  I  have  sacri- 
ficed to  him  thousands  of  oxen  ....  thighs. 

Speech  of  Amen :  (lines  26-31). 

Speech  of  Amen-ra  king  of  the  gods  :  My  Son  out 
of  my  body,  my  favourite  Neb-maat-ra,  my  living 
image,  created  by  my  limbs,  born  of  Mut  the  Lady 
of  Ashru  in  Thebes,  the  Lady  of  the  peoples  of  the 
Nine  Bows,  who  bred  thee  |^'  as  the  only  lord  of  men. 
My  heart  is  greatly  rejoiced  when  I  see  thy  beauties. 

I  do  wonders  for  thy  Majesty: 

Thou  becomest  young  again, 

I  have  made  thee  the  Sun  of  the  Two  Lands. 

I  turn  my  face  towards  the  SOUTH, 

(And)  I  do  wonders  1=^  for  thee : 

(For)  I  make  the  lords  of  Ethiopia  hasten  to  thee 

With  all  their  tributes  on  their  backs. 

I  turn  my  face  towards  the  NORTH; 

(And)  I  do  wonders  for  thee  : 

(For)  I  make  the  lands  come  from  the  ends  of  Asia 

With  all  their  tributes  on  their  backs. 

They  dedicate  themselves  to  thee  |»9  with  their  chil- 
dren. 

They  come  (lit.  "  one  comes ")  that  thou  mayest 
give  them  in  return  the  breath  of  life. 

I  turn  my  face  towards  the  WEST, 

(And)  I  do  wonders  for  thee  : 

(For)  I  make  thee  seize  the  Tahenu  (Libyans), 

They  remember  not, 

E 


26 


THE  INSCRIPTIONS. 


They  build  this  fortress  in  the  name  of  |3°  thy 
("njy")  Majesty 

Surrounded  by  a  great  wall, 

WTiich  towers  to  the  sky, 

Settled  with  the  children  of  the  princes  of  the  Nu- 
bian Troglodytes. 

I  turn  my  face  towards  the  SUNRISE 

(And)  I  do  wonders  for  thee  : 

(For)  I  make  the  lands  of  Punt  come  to  thee 

With  all  kinds  |3»  of  pleasant  spices  of  their  lands. 

To  beg  peace  of  thee. 

And  to  breathe  the  breath,  which  thou  givest. 

King  of  Upper  and  Lower  Egypt,  Prince 

Of  the  peoples  of  the  Nine  Bows,  Lord  of  the  two 

Lands, 
Neb-maat-Ra,  Son  of  the  Sun,  his  favourite, 
Amenhotep,  Prince  of  Thebes  ;   content 
Is  the  heart  of  the  gods  with  his  monuments — 
He  is  gifted  with  life,  stability, 
Purity  (?)  and  health.     His  heart 
Rejoices  like  the  Sun  for  ever. 

48.  Plates  XIH,  XIV.  Great  stele  of  Me- 
RENPTAH.  This  has  been  engraved  on  the  rough 
back  of  the  stele  of  Amenhotep  III.,  which  was 
removed  from  his  temple,  and  placed  back  outward, 
against  the  wall,  in  the  forecourt  of  the  temple  of 
Merenptah.  Owing  to  the  rough  surface,  and  the 
poor  cutting,  the  readings  in  many  places  require 
careful  examination.  For  this,  there  have  been  used 
(l)  a  hand  copy  by  myself,  taken  at  a  disadvantage,  as 
it  lay  face  downward  ;  (2)  a  paper  squeeze,  made  by 
Prof.  Petrie  ;  (3)  photographs  of  the  stele,  and  of 
squeezes  of  it,  made  by  E.  Brugsch  Bey,  on  a  larger 
scale. 

The  scene  at  the  top  retains  its  original  colouring 
of  yellow,  red,  and  blue.  Amen  is  shewn  giving  a 
sword  to  the  king,  who  is  backed  by  Mut  on  one  side 
and  by  Khonsu  on  the  other.  Of  the  inscription  a 
copy  was  published  in  the  Zeitschrift  f  Ae.  Sp.  1896 
p.  I.,  with  commentary  by  me.  Hence  only  a  plain 
translation  is  given  here. 

The  Triumphal  Song  of  Merenptah. 

/.  Protocol. 

"  In  the  year  V.,  on  the  third  day  of  the  third 
month  of  the  period  of  inundation,  under  the  Majesty 
of  Horus  Ra,  the  strong  bull,  high  in  (?)  truth,  the 
King  of  Upper  and  Lower  Egypt  Banera  Meriamen, 
son  of  Ra,  Merenptali-Hetephermaat  the  increaser  of 


power,  raising  the  victorious  sword  of  Horus-Ra,  the 
strong  bull,  smiting  the  Nine  Bows  (foreigners)  whose 
name  endures  to  all  eternity." 

II.  Merenptah  Triumphator. 
{a)  Introduction. 

"  Report  of  his  |=  triumph  in  all   lands,  proclama- 
tion to  all  lands  together  in  order  that  may  be  known 
the  glory  of  the  deeds  of  victory  of  King  Merenptah, 
the  bull,  the  Lord  of  power. 
Slaughtering  his  enemies. 
Beautiful  in  the  field  of  victory. 
His  attack  is  the  sun, 
Which    frightens   away  the   clouds   that   stand   over 

Egypt. 
He  causes  Egypt  to  see  the  sunbeams, 
And  overthrows  the  brazen  mountain. 
From  the  neck  of  the  people ; 
He  gives  freedom  to  men  who  languish  in  imprison- 
ment. 
He  avenges  Memphis  upon  its  enemies. 
He  causes  Ptah  Totunen  to  rejoice  over  his  foes. 
He  opens  the  gates  of  the  City  of  Walls  (Memphis) 

which  were  closed, 
He  causes  the   temples  to  receive  again   their  meal 

offerings, 
King  Merenptah,  he  who  makes  firm  the  hearts   of 
hundreds  of  thousands  and  of  millions." 

[fi)  The  Defeat  of  Libya. 

"  At  the  sight  of  him  the  breath  of  life  enters  their 

nostrils, 
The   land    of    Temehu   (Libyan   tribe)   stands   open 

during  his  lifetime. 
Eternal   terror  is   laid   in   the   heart  of  the  Masha- 

washa  (Libyan  tribe) 
He  makes  the  tribe   of  the  Lehu  withdraw,  having 

invaded  Egypt. 
Great  fear  of  Egypt  is  in  their  hearts. 
They  were  come  their  face  in  front  (?) 
They  were  turned  backward  (?) 
Their  legs  did  not  stay  firm,  but  fled. 
Their  archers  threw  their  bows  away. 
Their  runners  were  weary  of  (?)  marching. 
They  unbound  their  skins 
And  threw  them  to  the  ground. 
Their  sacks  (?)  were  taken  and  poured  out  (?) 
The  wretched  conquered  Prince  of  Libya  fled, 
Under  the  protection  of  the  night. 
Alone,  without  the  plume  on  his  head. 


THE  INSCRIPTIONS. 


27 


His  feet  failed  (?) 

His  women  were  taken  away  before  his  face, 

The  provisions  (?)  of  his  store  (?)  were  plundered, 

He  had  no  water  skin  for  his  sustenance, 

His  brothers  plotted  his  murder, 

His  officers  fought  with  one  another, 

Their  camp  was  burned,  made  to  ashes  (?) 

His  whole  property  became  a  booty  of  the  soldiers. 

Arriving  in  his  country  he  lamented, 

Every  one  in   his  country  was   ashamed   to  receive 

him  (?) 
Punished  prince,  evil  fate,  '  feather ' !  (?) 
Called  him  all  the  inhabitants  of  his  city. 
He   is   in    the   power   of    the   gods,   the    Lords    of 

Memphis. 
The  ruler  of  Egypt  has  cursed  his  name, 
Mauroy  is  an  abomination  to  Memphis, 

With  every  descendant  of  his  family  forever ; 

Barter  a- Meriainun  pursues  his  children, 

Merneptali-Hetepherntaat  is  sent  to  him  as  a  Fate, 

He  is  become  a  proverb  (?)  for  Libya. 

The  young  men  tell  each  other  of  his  victories: 

Since  the  time  of  Ra  such   has  never  happened  to 
us!  (?) 

All  old  men  tell  to  their  sons : 

Woe  (?)  over  Libya ! 

One  can  no  longer  go  pleasantly  in  the  fields. 

In  a   single   day  our  walking   has   been   made   im- 
possible, 

In  one  year  the  Tehenu  have  been  burned. 

Sutech  has  turned  his  back  to  their  princes. 

Their  settlements  are  wasted  on  account  of  him  (.?) 

In  those  days  one  did  not  carry  baskets,  (.') 

It  was  best  to  hide  one's  self. 

One  is  safe  (only)  in  the  citadel  (?). 

The  great  ruler  of  Egypt, 

Might  and  strength  belong  to  him. 

Who  dares  to  fight,  knowing  his  step ! 

A  wretched  and  mad  one  is  he  who  resists  him. 

He  who  transgresses  his  command. 

Does  not  see  the  next  day. 

For  Egypt  is  called  since  the  reign  of  the  gods. 

The  only  daughter  of  Ra, 

His  son  sitting  upon  the  throne  of  Shu,  the  sun  of 
Ra. 

His  heart  is  not  forbearing  (.?)  towards  him. 

Who  outrages  his  inhabitants. 

The  eye  of  every  god  pursues  him 

Who  abuses  the 

It  brings  up  the  most  distant  foes — 

Thus  they  speak  (sc.  the  old  men) 


The  seers  of  the  stars  (i*) 

Who  know  their  meaning  observing  them  say:  (?) 

A  great  wonder  has  come  to  pass  in  Egypt, 

He  has  made  him  whom  his  hand  reached, 

A  living  prisoner. 

The  divine  King  triumphs  (.')  over  his  enemies  before 

Ra. 
Mauroy,  the  evil  doer,  is  dashed  down  (?)  by  every 

god  of  Memphis. 
He  (sc.  Ra)  judges  him  in  Heliopolis, 
And  the  assembly  of  the  gods  declares  him  guilty 

of  his  crimes. 

The  Lord  of  the  All  says  : 

Give  the  sword  of  victory. 

To  my  true-hearted,  good  and  mild  son  Merenptah, 

Who  cares  for  Memphis  (?) 

And  defends  Heliopolis  (?) 

The  cities  closed  shall  be  opened  again. 

He  shall  free  many  enchained  in  each  district  (?) 
And  give  sacrifices  to  the  temples  (again). 

He  shall  bring  incense  before  the  god  again. 

He   shall   bring   back  (?)  again   to   the   great   their 

property, 
And  let  the  poor  return  (?)  into  their  cities. — 
The  Lords  of  Heliopolis  say  to  their  son  Merenptah  : 
May  a  long  lifetime  be  his  lot, 
For   he   has   defended    the   oppressed    (?)   of    every 

foreign  land. 
Egypt  shall  be  given  to  him  as  the  heritage  (?) 
Of  him,  who  has  placed  him  (?) 
As  administrator  for  himself  forever  (?). 
(For)  his  strength  is  its  people. 
Behold  one  is  sitting  safe  in  the  time  of  the  strong  (?) 
The  breeze  of  life  is  on  his  arms  (?) 

The  following  is  told : 

Mauroy   the   wretched   conquered   prince   of    Libya 

came. 
To  attack  the  walls  of  the  Prince  (Memphis), 
And  [of]  every  (god)  (?)  who  lets  his  son  be  brilliant 

upon  his  seat. 
The  King  of  Upper  and  Lower  Egypt  Merenptah. — 
Ptah  speaks  to  the  prince  of  Libya : 
All  his  crimes  shall  be  collected. 
And  shall  fall  back  upon  his  head  ; 
He  shall  be  given  into  the  hand  of  Merenptah, 
That  he  may  cause  him  to  spit  out. 
What  he  has  swallowed  as  a  crocodile. 
As  the  hastener  brings  up  the  hastening  (?), 
The  Lord  {i.e.  Pharoah)  shall  seize  him, 

2  E 


X 


38 


THE   INSCRIPTIONS. 


That  he  may  know  (?)  his  power. 

Amon  shall  bind  him  with  his  hand, 

And  give  him  over  to  his  Ka  in  Hermonthis, 

King  of  Upper  and  Lower  Egypt  Merenptah. — 

Great  joy  shall  rule  in  Ketnet, 

Exultation    shall     rush    forth    from     the    cities    of 

Tamera ; 
They  shall  tell  of  the  victories, 
Which  Merenptah  has  won  over  the  Tehenu,  crying : 
How  dear  is  he  the  prince  of  the  victory ! 
How  great  is  the  king  among  the  gods  ! 
How  happy  is  he  the  Lord  who  commands  ! 

One  is  talking : 

Come  far  out  upon  the  roads, 

There  is  no  fear  in  the  heart  of  men. 

The  castles  are  abandoned  .  .  . 

The  wells  opened  (again), 

The  messengers  return  home  {}) 

The  battlements  lie  calm  in  the  sun  (?) 

Until  their  guards  awake. 

The  soldiers  lie  in  sleep 

The  Nawt  and   the  Tektina  are  in  the  marsh  they 

like, 
The  cattle  are  let  on  the  pasture  (?)  (again). 
No  one  fears  (.')  to  go  on  the  high  Nile. 
By  night  resounds  not  the  cry :  (?) 
Stop !    or    come,  come !   (?)   in    the   mouth   of  the 

people. 
One  goes  with  singing  (?) 
There  is  no  more  the  lament  of  sighing  man. 
The  villages  are  settled  anew. 
He  who  has  tilled  his  crop  will  eat  it." 

(c)  Tlte  Defeat  of  the  other  Enemies  of  Egypt. 

"  (For)  Ra  has  turned  himself  again  to  Egypt ; 

He  is  bom  to  avenge  it, 

The    King    of    Upper   and    Lower    Egypt   Banera 

Meriamen,  sun  of  Ra  Merenptah-Hetephermaat. 
The  princes  bend  down,  saying  '  Hail ! '  (oi^b') 
Not  one  raises  his  head  among  the  Nine'^ows. 
Devastated  is  Tehenu,  ^ 

Kheta  is  quieted, 

Seized  is  t]ie  Kanaan  with  every  evil, 
Led  away  is  Askelon, 
Taken  is  Gezer, 
Yenoam  is  brought  to  nought, 
The  people  of  Israel  is  laid  waste, — their  crops  are 

not, 
Khor  (Palestine)  has  become  as  a  widow  for  Egypt, 


All  lands  together — they  are  in  peace. 
Every  one  who  roamed  about 

Is  punished   by  King   Merenptah,   gifted   with   life, 
like  the  sun  every  day." 

49.  Plate  XV.  Stele  of  Duaui-er-neheh. 
This  unfinished  stele  of  limestone  was  found  in  the 
ruins  of  the  temple  of  Amenhotep  II.  The  following 
is  the  transliteration  : 

Top,  Left  Hand.  Ari  patiu  hdti  semer  da  n  merut. 
Mer  peruer  Dudin-er-neheh,  dtef  Benda,  inntef  Mesutd. 

Top,  Right  Hand.  Uden  dkhet  neb  nefret  udbet  n 
mer  per  [uer  Dudin-er-neheh]. 

Long  Inscription.  Ari  patiu  hdti  .  .  .  ti  bdti  teken 
em  setni  nd  res  tep  (?)  her  neb  em  bek  Iter  held  dakhut 
en  nebf  set  hen  n  setni  her  menkh  dbf  er  drt  mekru 
thesutf;  mer  per  uer  Diidui-er-neheli  mad-kheru.  Hak 
drf  em  hetep  dd  setni  dkhet  neb  nefret  nezmet  sekhep 
udb  her  heteptek  shemst{u)k  an  kauk  er  sutk  udbet  r 
setk  ent  Ra-kreret  em  lietep  em  hetep  kher  neter  da,  vier 
per  uer  Dudui-er-neheh  mad-kheru.  Ezdef  kher  remthet 
unenyu  ezdd  enthen  khepret  nd  her  drind  em  s/tems 
dty  shemsnd  su  her  mu  her  ta  khet  khaset  resit  mehtit 
en  du  sepd  em  setp-sa  drnd  zedet-nef  menkh{a)  sekhent 
kud  er  mdtd  neb  erddkud  em  hdt  semeruf  ddnd  da  er 
net  neheh  drnd  mereret  remthet  heseset  enteru  send  ta 
em  sdh  neb  hesyu  en  neter  nefer  kdhnd  tet  her  rensen 
dru  nd  hetep  dd  setni  md  nu  drnd  tep  ta  dnuk  sdh 
en  drtnef  zed  nefret  uhem  mereret  nefer  pu  drt  her 
dry{u)t. 

Translation.  "The  hereditary  prince,  the  most 
beloved  friend,  the  great  major-domo  Duaui-er-neheh. 
His  father  Benaa.  His  mother  Mesut.  Offering  of 
all  good  and  pure  things  for  the  [great]  major-domo 
[Duaui-er-neheh.] 

I'  The  hereditary  prince,  the  treasurer  of  the  king 
of  Upper  and  Lower  Egypt,  who  approaches  the  king 
of  Upper  Egypt,  the  only  one  who  watches  while  all 
else  are  tired  of  seeking  the  glory  of  his  Lord, )'  whom 
the  king  has  raised  up  by  reason  of  the  ability  of  his 
heart  to  care  for  his  levy(?),  the  great  major-domo 
Duaui-er-neheh,  the  deceased.  Thou  art  going  down 
|3  with  the  royal  offering,  consisting  of  all  good  and 
sweet  things,  the  sacred  linen  (?)  is  brought  to  thy  sacri- 
fices, thou  art  followed  by  thy  kas  to  thy  pure  places, 
to  thy  places  of  Ra-kreret,  |*  in  peace,  in  peace,  with 
the  great  god,  the  great  major-domo  Duaui-er-neheh, 
the  deceeised.  He  speaks  to  the  men  who  are  living  : 
I  tell  you  what  happened  |5  to  me  when  I  was  follower 
of  the  king.  I  followed  him  by  water  and  by  land, 
through  the  countries  both  south  and  north.     There 


/ 


X 


THE   INSCRIPTIONS. 


29 


was  no  reproach  |*  against  me  coming  to  the  palace. 
I  did  what  he  said  in  an  excellent  manner  (?).  I  was 
raised  above  every  equal,  and  was  put  at  the  head  of 
his  friends.  [Now].  I  am  coming  \>  to  the  city  of 
eternity  (the  other  world).  I  have  done  what  mankind 
loves,  and  the  gods  praise.  I  am  buried  like  every 
noble  distinguished  by  the  Good  God.  Stretch  forth 
to  me  (your)  hand  in  their  name,  make  |^  for  me  the 
^iep  da  setni  (recital  of  royal  offering)  according  to 
what  I  did  upon  earth.  I  am  a  noble  by  what  he 
made  me,  telling  those  things  that  are  good,  repeating 
those  things  that  are  dear,  (for)  it  is  good  to  reward  a 
man  according  to  his  works." 

I.  2.  "  levy,"  see  Griffith,  Kahun  papyri  i.  2. 

1.  3.  Uab  may  be  the  same  as  the  word  determined 
by  cloth  in  "  Tomb  of  Paheri  "  (IX.  4). 

1.  3.  Ra-kreret  is  especially  the  necropolis  of  Siut. 

50.  Plate  XVI.  The  foundation  deposits  give 
the  two  names  of  the  wife  of  Siptah  called  Te-usret- 
sotpet-ne-Mut  and  Sit-Ra-meri[t]-Amen,  of  whom 
scarabs  are  also  known.  There  are  some  other 
instances  of  the  article  being  merely  written  as  t  in 
the  XlXth  dynasty :  see  in  Brit.  Mus..  stele  132,  and 
palette  12,778. 

Plate  XVIII.  No.  XIV.  reads  "may  Ra  and 
Amen  open  a  good  year."  No.  7.,  "firm  (steady) 
every  year."  No.  1 3.,  "  chief  treasurer  of  the  whole 
land,  chief  Bay." 

Plate  XIX.  Among  the  vases  of  the  foundation 
deposits  of  Tausert  and  Siptah  there  are  two  complete 
copies  of  a  text,  6  and  10,  with  a  piece  9,  and  perhaps 
other  pieces,  7  and  8 :  it  is  remarkable  for  the  very 
cursive  handwriting,  especially  in  the  form  of  the 
article.     It  reads : 

"  Year  IV.  Wine  of  the  third  day  of  the  garden  in 
the  Lake  of  the  Whole  Land,  which  is  in  ...  on  the 
western  bank,  by  the  chief  vintner  Pra-hotpe,  who  is 
under  the  land  steward  Pi-besa." 

The  other  complete  piece,  No.  5,  reads  : 

"  Year  III.  Wine  of  the  third  day  of  the  garden  of 
the  temple  of  Sety  Merenptah  (Sety  II)  in  the  house 
of  Amen,  which  is  the  farm  (?)  of  Tum,  by  the  chief 
vintner  .  .  .  Anana."  For  this  reading  of  the  "  third 
day,"  see  the  full  transcription  which  will  appear  in 
the  volume  on  the  Ostraca  of  the  Ramesseum. 

No.  4  may  be  restored  thus  : — 

[Year  x,  wine  of  the]  "  garden  of  the  house  of  Sety 
Merenptah  (Sety  11),  in  the  house  of  Amen,  [by  the 
chief]  vintner  Pa-mer-shunet." 

No.  3  again  mentions  "  the  garden  of  the  house  of 
Sety  II." 


No.  I  is  part  of  an  inscription  naming  the  wine  of 
the  garden  of  the  "  temple  of  millions  of  years,"  of  a 
place  (perhaps  "the  water  of  Amen")  "on  the  west 
of  Thebes." 

No.  2  is  one  of  the  most  important  fragments, 
reading:  "[Year  x\  wine  of  the  21st  day  .  .  .  queen 
of  Upper  and  Lower  Egypt,  Sit-ra-merit-Amen.  .  .  ." 
Though  it  is  not  clear  in  what  connection  the  name 
of  queen  Tausert  occurs  here,  yet  this  gives  the 
full  and  clear  reading  of  the  name.  The  queen  here 
has  the  title  of  the  king  setni  ebyoti,  whose  feminine 
form    did    not    exist.      (See    Sethe   U titer siichungen, 

i,  27). 

Plate  XX.  Here  are  also  some  other  fragments 
of  wine  jars,  but  not  from  foundation  deposits.  No.  8 
reads : — 

"  [Year  jr,  wine]  ofthe  temple  of  millions  of  [years  .  .  . 
in  the  house  of]  Amen,  which  is  in  the  north  of  the  pro- 
perty of  Ramesgu  II  ...  by  the  chief  vintner  .  .  .  ." 

No.  12.  "  .  .  .  the  garden  of  Merenptah  Hetep- 
her-maat  .  .  .  Puah." 

No.  13.  "  ...  wine  of  the  fourth  day  of  the  .  .  . 
west  by  Puah." 

No.  10.  "...  wine  ...  by  the  vintner  (?)  Su-ne- 
[ra?]" 

No.  1 1  names  a  "  prophet  Sety,"  who  is  also  known 
by  another  piece  found  in  the  excavations. 

Of  the  other  fragments.  No.  i  seems,  so  far  as  can 
be  seen,  to  be  a  piece  of  a  business  letter  ;  all  that  is 
legible  is  "  The  prince  is  standing  over  the  work,  one 
is  .  .  .  his  au  let  .  .  .  " 

No.  2  reads  :  "  The  men  of  the  farm  (?,  qaht)  who 
one  will 

"  arrest  (?)  {ataic  T) 
"  [Pa]  ur,  his  mother  Henut 
"...  tny,  his  mother  Atef-res 
"    .  .  .  ,  his  mother  Hent-Ty  (?) 
" son  of  Tent-nub." 

No.  3.  In  this  fragment,  only  the  beginning  of  the 
name  of  Amenhotep  II  is  clear. 

No.  4.  A  razor  and  a  pair  of  sandals ;  perhaps,  as 
Prof.  Petrie  suggests  very  ingeniously,  a  bill  of  ex- 
change. 

No.  7.  Duplicate  of  the  beginning  of  the  "  Nile 
hymn  "  (Pap.  Sail.  II,  ii,  6-7  =  Anast  VII,  vii,  7-8). 
The  variant  s/iems  for  seshm  is  to  be  noted. 

No.  6.  "Third  month  of  the  sowing  season,  13th 
day  of  delivering  (?)  the  bread  to  the  vinedressers  by 
Hui  and  Pay.  Prs  (?)  cake,  100  deben  daily.  Re- 
ceived from  him  in  the  third  month  of  the  sowing 
season,  at  the  temple  of  Tahutmes  III  {sic)  life,  health 


30 


SHELLS   USED  BY   THE   EGYPTIANS. 


..."  This  is  an  account  of  provisions  for  the 
vinedressers :  in  ancient  times  the  Theban  western 
canal  was  rich  in  vineyards. 

No.  5.  The  group  bek  zed  is  written  twice  with  a 
thick  reed,  as  a  pupil's  exercise. 

[51.  I  should  add  that  Dr.  Spiegelberg  has  very 
kindly  used  here  the  transliteration  with  which  English 
readers  are  perhaps  most  familiar  ;  but  this  is  without 
any  prejudice  to  his  personal  preference  for  a  different 
method. 

I  may  add  here  some  considerations  on  the 
mention  of  the  name  Israel  in  the  inscription  of 
Merenptah.  This  subject  was  opened  in  an  article 
on  "Egypt  and  Israel"  which  I  published  in  the 
"Contemporary  Review,"  May,  1896.  The  principal 
considerations  are  on  the  five  different  views  that 
may  be  taken  about  the  presence  of  "people  of 
Israel "  in  wars  of  Merenptah. 

(a)  It  might  be  taken  to  refer  to  the  oppression 
of  the  Biblical  Israelites  in  Egypt.  As  Merenptah 
is  usually  thought  to  be  the  Pharaoh  of  the  Exodus, 
Israel  being  spoiled  so  that  it  had  no  seed  might  be 
taken  as  a  reference  to  the  slaughter  of  the  male 
children.  But  on  the  contrary  this  statement  is  put 
between  the  naming  of  Ycnuamu  (or  Yanuh  near 
Tyre),  and  of  Khal  or  Palestine.  Hence  it  should 
refer  to  spoiling  some  Israelites  in  Palestine. 

(b)  It  might  be  supposed  to  refer  to  the  Biblical 
Israelites  in  Palestine  after  the  Exodus.  But  as 
there  is  no  trace  of  any  Egyptian  invasion  of  Pales- 
tine in  the  various  wars  and  turmoils  recorded  in  the 
book  of  Judges,  we  can  hirdly  refer  this  to  the 
Israelite  history  that  we  know.  As  moreover  there 
is  no  trace  of  the  campaigns  of  Ramessu  III  in  the 
book  of  Judges,  the  Biblical  Israelites  can  hardly 
have  been  in  Palestine  even  as  late  as  that  I  have 
shown  in  the  Proceedings  of  the  Society  of  Biblical 
Archaeology,  xviii,  243  ;  Dec.  1 896 ;  how  the  lists  of 
generations,  and  the  division  of  the  history  of  Judges 
into  three  series  of  different  regions,  agree  to  the 
Israelites  not  entering  Palestine  till  after  the  last 
campaign  of  Ramessu  III. 

(f)  It  is  very  possible  that  some  portion  of  "the 
people  of  Israel"  remained  in  Palestine  when  the 
others  went  into  Egypt.  And  this  might  be  the 
people  attacked  by  Merenptah.  Such  a  view  seems 
to  me  to  be  perhaps  less  unlikely  than  any  other. 

(d)  Some  Israelites  may  have  gone  back  to  Pales- 
tine directly  the  famine  was  over  in  Canaan.  That 
they  readily  might  travel  there  is  shewn  by  the 
burial  of  Jacob  at  Machpelah  (Gen.  i.  13) ;  and  there 


is  absolutely  no  evidence  that  they  all  remained  in 
Egypt  until  the  Exodus.  A  continuity  of  tradition 
about  the  family  sepulchres  is  shewn  by  the  recog- 
nition of  the  cave  at  Machpelah,  and  of  the  burial 
place  at  Shechem.  And  this  implies  that  some 
members  of  the  clan  continuously  lived  in  the  country- 

{e)  Another  possibility  is  that  immediately  after 
the  Exodus  some  Israelites  may  have  made  their 
way  into  Palestine,  as  they  prospected  in  the  land, 
wishing  to  occupy  it,  and  even  defeated  the  Canaan- 
ites  in  the  south  (Num.  xxi,  3)  in  what  appears  to  be 
another  version  of  the  conflict  soon  after  the  Exodus 
(Num.  xiv.  45). 

Neither  the  hypothesis  a  nor  b  seem  likely,  when 
we  look  at  the  order  of  the  inscription  here,  and  the 
complete  silence  about  Egyptian  invasions  in  Judges. 
If  we  then  resort  to  one  of  the  hypotheses  of  a 
divided  body  of  Israelites,  the  hypothesis  a  seems 
more  probable  than  the  others,  as  these  "  people  of 
Israel "  seem  to  have  been  in  the  north  of  Palestine, 
and  are  less  likely  therefore  to  have  gone  into  Egypt 
or  to  have  come  out  again. 

It  may  be  noted  that  a  duplicate  of  this  inscription 
existed  at  Karnak,  of  which  Duemichen  has  published 
the  remaining  fragment  in  Historische  Inschriften  I  c. 
His  line  i  ends  at  near  the  end  of  line  1 1  here  ;  2  at 
mid  line  12  ;  3  mid  line  13  ;  4  early  in  line  14;  5 
late  in  line  14 ;  and  so  on,  evidently  omitting  a  line 
between  8  and  9,  until  his  last  line,  19,  ends  at  one 
third  along  line  27  here.  There  were  therefore  34 
lines  in  the  Karnak  copy,  12  lost  at  the  beginning, 
20  of  which  the  ends  remain  (one  omitted  by  D.)  and 
2  lost  at  the  end.  One  difference  may  be  noted  in  the 
texts,  the  present  version  attributes  the  divine  speech 
to  Ptah  (1.  19),  while  the  Karnak  version  names 
Amen  (1.  10),  W.  M.  F.  Petrie.] 


CHAPTER  X. 

SHELLS  USED  BY  THE   EGYPTIANS. 

52.  In  earlier  excavations  at  Koptos,  Ballas,  and 
Naqada,  many  specimens  of  shells  were  collected  ; 
and  these  have  now  been  identified  by  the  care  of 
Mr.  Edgar  A.  Smith  of  the  British  Museum  (Natural 
History).  To  this  list  I  have  added  those  names 
which  are  given  by  M.  de  Morgan  as  belonging  to 
the  remains  of  the  New  Race,  in  "  Recherches  sur  les 
Origines  de  I'Egypte,"  pp.  145-6.  In  the  column  of 
region,  R.S.  =  Red   Sea  and   Indian   Ocean ;   M.  = 


SHELLS   USED  BY  THE  EGYPTIANS. 


31 


Mediterranean  ;  N.  =  Nile  ;  E.  =  Egypt  (land).  In 
the  column  of  locality,  B.  =  Ballas,  with  the  number 
of  the  tomb  ;  N.  =  Naqada,  with  the  tomb  number  ; 
Z.  =  Zowaydeh  ;  the  numbers  in  loops  are  the  number 
of  examples.  K.  =  Koptos,  and  such  are  not  dated. 
All  of  the  others  are  of  the  New  Race  period. 


.(Etheria  Cailliaudi   .      . 

Firus. 

N. 

(De  Morgan.) 

,,        elliplica 

Lamk. 

N. 

B.  65  ;  B.  760 ;  K. 

Area  (Anadara)  antiquata 

.  Linn. 

R.S. 

K.  (2). 

Cadium  pomum 

.  Linn. 

R.S. 

(De  Morgan.) 

Cardium  edule    . 

.  Linn. 

M. 

B.  519  (6). 

Cassis  nodulosa  var. 

Gmel. 

R.S. 

B.  207. 

Cleopatra  bulimoides     . 

.    Oliv. 

N. 

fB.  672  (78);  B.  590; 
(De  Morgan). 

Columbella  ligula     . 

.    Rid. 

R.S. 

N.  1234  (10). 

Conus  ceylanensis    . 

Hwass. 

R.S. 

Z.  23  (4),  K. 

,,      pusillus     . 

Chemn. 

R.S. 

(De  Morgan). 

,,      strialus     . 

.  Linn. 

R.S. 

N.  1503. 

,,      tessellatus      .      .      . 

.  Born. 

R.S. 

K. 

,,      textile  var.    . 

,  Linn. 

R.S. 

/B.  ;  N.  1684;  South 
\     Town ;  K. 

,.      sp 

. 

R.S. 

B.  65s  (4). 

Cypraea  annulus 

.  Linn. 

R.S. 

K. 

„        arabica 

.  Linn. 

R.S. 

K. 

„     (reticulata) 

... 

R.S. 

(De  Morgan.) 

,,       carneola     .     . 

.  Linn. 

R.S. 

B. 

„        caurica 

.  Linn. 

R.S. 

B.  ? 

„       erosa     .     .     .     . 

.   Linn. 

R.S. 

B. 

„       pantherina 

.  Solan. 

R.S. 

N.  South  Town  (2). 

Engina  mendicaria  . 

.  Lamk. 

R.S. 

K.  (3). 

Helix  desertorum    . 

.  Forsk. 

E. 

N.  1615  (2). 

„     melanostoma . 

Drap.  1 

E. 

K. 

Heterocentrotus  mammilatus  (spine) 
Limnea,  stagnalis  var.  . 
Lotorium  tritonis 
Mamilla  maura  . 
Mitra  maculosa  . 

,,     (Strigatella)  literata 
Nerita  crassilabrum , 


polita 


,.       sp 

Oliva  sp 

Osilinus  sp 

Ovula  ovum  .... 
Pectunculus  violacescens 
„  sp.  .      .     . 

Polinices  mamilla    . 
Pterocera  bryonia    . 
Purpura  tuberculata 
Rostellaria  curvirostris  . 
Sistrum  anaxares      .      , 
Spatha  Cailliaudi     , 

,,        rubens    . 

„        sp.    .      .      .      . 
Strombus  fasciatus   ,      . 

,,         tricornis   . 

Terebra  caerulescens     . 

,,       consobrina  . 

,,       maculata     .      . 

Turbo  sp.  ?  (opercula)  . 

Unio  Aegyptiacus   . 

„    dembeae 
,,    teretiusculus 

Vivipara  unicolor    .     . 


Linn. 

Lamk.  1 

Reeve 

Lamk. 

Smith  1 

Linn. 


Linn. 
Lamk. 


Linn. 

Gmel. 
Blain. 
Lamk. 

Duel. 


Lamk. 

Born. 
Lamk. 
Lamk. 

Desk. 

Linn. 

Caill. 

Reeve 
Phil. 

Oliv. 


N. 
R.S. 
R.S. 
R.S. 
R.S. 
R.S. 

R.S. 


R.S. 
R.S. 


M. 

M. 
R.S. 
R.S. 
R.S. 
R.S. 
R.S. 

N. 

N. 

N. 
R.S. 
R.S. 
R.S. 
R.S. 
R.S. 
R.S. 

N. 

N. 
N. 

N. 


K. 

(De  Morgan  ) 

K. 

B. 

B.  (22). 

K. 

N.  1429. 

K.  (2)  ;  B.  (2)  ;  (De 

Morgan). 
■B.  28  (14);  B.  580; 
B.  6SS  (7)  ;  N.  1567. 
N.  1567;  K. 
B.  580. 
B.  519(2). 
B.  S19  (40). 
N.  1684. 
B.  572  ;  K. 
K.  (3). 

(De  Morgan.) 
K. 

(De  Morgan.) 
(De  Morgan.) 
B.  456,  471,  568. 
K. 

(De  Morgan.) 
K.  (young). 
N.  1567. 
N.  1567 ;  K. 
K.  (5). 
K.  (2). 

fB.  191,760,  767.    (De 
\     Morgan.) 
B.  522. 
(De  Morgan.) 
(B.    672     (47);      (De 
[  Morgan). 


(      32      ) 


INDEX, 


PAGB 

Aahmes,  on  stele  ....       S 

Akhenaten,  erasures  by     4,  lO,  li 

Altars  of  temples  .      .      .      .     12 

Amen,  erasure  of  .      .      .      10,  1 1 

Amenemhat,  stele  of  .      .       4,  20 

Amenhotep  II,  dated  jar  of   .       5 

„  scarab  of  .       3,  21 

„  temple  of      3,  4-6 

„  statue  of  .      .       s 

„  statuette  of      5,  21 

„  length  of  reign      5 

„  altar  in  ruins         4 

Amenhotep       III,       restores 

chapel  of  Uazmes     .      .       3,  1 1 
Amenhotep  III,  ring  of    .      .       3 
„             re-works  tem- 
ple of  Amenhotep  II    4,  6,  9,  1 1 
Amenhotep  III,  temple  of,  re- 
served        9 

Amenhotep  III,  temple  W.  of 

Thebes 24 

Amenhotep    III,    temple    of 

Luxor 24 

Amenhotep     III,    temple    of 

Kamak 25 

Amenhotep     III,    temple    of 

Soleb 25 

Amenhotep  III,  sculptures  of 

9-1 1,  20,  23-28 
Amenhotep  III,  inscriptions  of 

21-28 
Amenhotep  IV,  figure  of  .      .     10 

Anni,  on  stele 5 

Architraves 12 

Asar-hapi  invoked        .      .      .18 
Asit,  Syrian  goddess   .      .       9,  21 

Askelon 28 

Assyrian  helmet  and  tools     18,  19 
Aten-temple  seal    .     .      .       6,  21 


PAGE 

Athu-asir,  stele  of  .  .  4,  21 
Avenue  of  couchant  jackals  .  10 
Azimuths  of  temples   ...     20 

4,  20 
16 
17 

5 
6 

19 


Bakt,  stele  of    ...      , 
Bay,  chancellor 
Beads,  rough  carnelian 
Benaa,  on  stele 
Blue-painted  pottery    . 
Brace  cranks  (?) 
Brickwork   arching  on    stone 

architraves     .... 
Brickwork  store   chambers  of 

Merenptah     . 
Brickwork  tunnels  of  Rames 


seum 

Bronze  statuette  of  a  queen 
„       helmet  and  bowl 

Capital  of  column 
Centre-bits,  iron 
Chalybes,  iron-workers 
Chisels,  iron      ,      .      .      . 
Colonnade,  triple    . 
Cubit  lengths    ...       7, 


12 


12 


I 

6 

8,19 

13 
19 
19 
19 
8 

I.  13 


Dealers  of  Thebes  ....  2 
Dehnet,  goddess  ....  20 
Deir  el  Bahri,  plan  of  .  7,  8,  12 
Doorway  south  of  temples  .  8 
Drawing  trials  .  .  .  .  4,  17 
Duaui-er-neheh,  stele  of  .  5,  28 
Dusenub,  altar  of  ...      ,      17,21 

Excavations,  success  in     .      .       i 

File,  iron 19 

Foundation  deposits,  Uazmes      3 
,,  „  early    .       4 


PAGE 

Foundation    deposits,   Amen- 
hotep II 5 

Foundation    deposits,    Meren- 
ptah     13 

Foundation  deposits,  Tausert,  14, 15 
„                 „        Siptah,  16,  17 
„                 „        inscrip- 
tions   29 

Foundation  trenches,  11,  13,  16,  22 


Gezer     .... 
Gravels  of  high  Nile 

Haworth,  Mr.  Jesse 
Helmet,  bronze 
Hieroglyphs,  mode  of 
Huy       .... 


Ingot  model 
Iron  tools  . 
Israel  inscription 


writing 


28 
II 

2 

18 

5 
23 


IS 

18,  19 

.2,28,  30 


Jackals,  couchant,  avenue  of  . 
Jar  with  date  of  Amenhotep  II 


Kanaan        .... 
Kennard,  Mr.  Martyn 

Kheta 

Khonsuardus,  tomb  of 
Khor  (Palestine)     . 

Lateran  obelisk 

Lebu 

Level  of  water  . 
Libyans,  figures  of 
„         defeat  of 

Magnetic  variation 
Maket  tomb,  Kahun    . 


9 

5 

28 
2 
28 
18 
28 


5 
26 
II 

6 

26-28 

.  20 
.   8 


INDEX. 


33 


Manetho  vindicated 

Mashawasha 

Merenptah     destroys 
Amenhotep  III,  9 
by,  1 1  ;  temple  of, 
granite  stele  of,  13; 

Mesut,  on  stele 

Min-mes,  stele  of   . 

Model  tools .     . 

Mud  beds,  ancient 

Murray,  Miss,  publishes  h 
glyphs      .      . 


PAGE 

5 

26 

temple    of 

bricks  used 

1-13  ;  black 

statues  of,  13 

•       5 
4,  22 

IS,  16 
II,  18 
lero- 

5 


Nebmes,  on  stele    . 
Nefer-renpit,  on  stele 
Nefret,  on  stele 
Nefret-ari,  on  stele 
Nehi,  ushabti  of 
Nen,  on  stele     . 
Nile-mud,  beds  of  . 

Osiride  figures 
Osiride  pillars  . 
Ostraka 


Panehesi,  vine-dresser 
Pashed,  steles  of     • 
Pekh-ar-Khonsu     . 
Pendehnet,  on  stele 
Pendua,  on  stele 
Pen-rannut,  stele  of 
Plan  of  temples 
Plummet  of  stone  . 
Pottery,  drawings  on 

„        spotted 

„        blue     . 

„        of  Tahutmes 
Psamtek  III      .      . 

„         tomb  of  . 
Ptah-hes,  stele  of    . 


Qazauadana 

Quarry  marks  . 

Queen,  bronze  statuette  of 


IV 


5. 


•  5 

•  5 

•  S 
.     20 

4,  21 
.  20 
II,  18 

•  4-  5 
II,  12 
.     29 


5.21 

•  3 
.  18 
.  20 
.  20 

13.  21 
19,  20 

•  9 

•  17 
.  6 
.       6 


.       7 
.     18 

13.  21 


PAGE 

Queen,  unknown,  chapel  of    .       6 

„  „        statue  of     .     22 

Quibell.Mr.,  attheRamesseum       i 


Ra,  priest  of  Tahutmes  111,4; 
Ra,  on  stele 
Ramesseum,  living  in  . 
Ramessu  IV,  drawing  of 
Rasp,  iron    .... 
Red  outlines  of  drawing 
Results  from  wide  clearances 

„       of  past  excavations 
Rosettes  for  dress  . 
Ruti,  on  stele    .... 


5,20 

5 
I 

17 
19 
5 
I 
2 
5 
5 


.     21 

9,  22 


Sandals  and  razor  marked  on 

jar 9 

Saws,  iron 19 

Scarp,  in  gravels  .  .  .  13,  18 
Scoop  cutter,  iron  .  .  .  .  19 
Sensenb,  on  stele  ....  5 
Sesh,  royal  scribe  .  .  .  6,  21 
Sety  I,  restorations  by  10,  11,  23 
Sety  II,  garden  of .  .  .  .29 
Shells  used  by  Egyptians       .     30 

Sickle,  iron 19 

Siptah,  relation  to  Tausert     .      i  S 
„       temple  of  .      .      .      16,  17 
Sistrum,  blue  glazed    ...       9 
Sitamen,  temple  of      .     3,  6,  9,  1 1 
Sphinxes  of  Amenhotep    III     10 
Spiegelberg,  Dr.  W.     .      .2,  20,  30 
Stamp  for  wine  jars     .      .       7,21 
Statues   of  Amenhotep   II,  S  ;  of 
Tahutmes  IV,  9  ;  of  Amenhotep 
III,  10;  of  Merenptah,  13 
Statuettes  of  wood     .      .      .     4,  5 
Steles  of  Athu-asir,  4  ;  of  Tahut- 
mes IV,  9,  20  ;   of  Amenhotep 
III,    limestone,    10,   23 ;    black 
granite,   10,  11,  23;    of  Meren- 
ptah, 13,  26;  Pen-rannut,  13,  21 


PAGE 

Taharqa,  pylon  of .      .      .      .      10 

Tahutmes  I,  cartouche  of        4,  20 

„  ushabti  of  (?),  4,  5,  21 

„         III,  priest  of     .  4,  5,  20 

IV,  temple  of  .     3,  j-g 

„  portraits  of       .       9 

Takushet,  statue     ....       6 

Tank  of  temple      ....      12 

Tas-nub 17,  21 

Tausert,  temple  of  .  13-16,23 
„  cartouches  of  .  15,  29 
„         history  of       ...      1 5 

Tehenu 27,  28 

Temehu       ......     26 

Temples  (see  kings'  names). 

„        plan  of     .      .     .     19,  20 

Tombs,  fragments  of,  3,  20 ;  under 

temple  of  Tahutmes  IV,  7, 8  ;  of 

XXIInd  dynasty,  4  ;  of  XXIIIrd 

dynasty,  18 

Trenches  of  foundations,  11,  13,  16 

Trial  pieces  of  drawings    .      .       4 

Troops,  organization  of     .      .     23 

Tua,  statue  of 6 

Tubes  of  glazed  pottery    .     .       6 

Uazmes,  chapel  of  ...  3 
User-aah,  on  stele  ....  S 
Ushabti  of  Nehi     .      .      .       4,21 

White  queen,  chapel  of     .      .  6 
„           „      bust  of  .      .      .22 
Wine-jar  ostraka    ....  29 
Work,    expected    and    unex- 
pected        I 

Work,  site  of I 

Workmen  from  Koptos     .      .  2 

„         Theban        ...  2 

Writing  of  hieroglyphs  on  stele  5 


Yenoam 


28 


LONDON: 
PRINTED    BY    WILLIAM    CLOWES    AND    SONS,    Limited, 

STAMFORD   STRKET  ANO  CHARING   CROSS. 


1  :4 


THEBES.       INSCRIPTIONS    OF    XVIII.   DYNASTY. 


.^^ 


7\1 


7 


M^^sa-^^ 


■#i:f9=:^r^t 


tT 


^ 


•nr 


■Z5¥ 


1:2 


THEBES.       FIGURES    OF    NEHI,    TAHUTMES    I,    AND    AMENHOTEP    II. 


II. 


'4.U  rj- 


]l  I.  \M 


r1  -}' 


ta-< 


.hr-Aa^ 


l.\A\  ^<^ 


WMF.  p. 


1:2 


THEBES.       FOUNDATION    DEPOSITS,    &C.       XVIII-XIX    DYNASTY. 


III. 


AMENHOTEP  II  "y-  SITAMEN 


THE     ATEN 


TAHUTMES     IV 


MERENPTAH. 
^8       x:::^n    R  *■?         r\^° 


/ 


1  :2 


THEBES.       POTTERY    OF    FOUNDATION    DEPOSIT,    XVIIIth    DYN.  ? 


IV. 


THEBES.       POTTERY    OF    FOUNDATION    DEPOSIT,    AMENHOTEP    II. 

12. 


1  :6 


THEBES,       POTTERY    OF    AMENHOTEP    II. 


1:3 


Z-.3 


tkiric^ 


POTTERY    OF    AMENHOTEP    II.?    OR    III. 


?        4- 


THEBES.     PORTRAITS     OF     KINGS,     &c. 


VI. 


1  :6 


THEBES.        POTTERY    OF    TAHUTMES    IV. 


VII. 


yi.  M  .E  p 


1:2 


THEBES.       TABLETS    OF    XVIII-XIX    DYNASTIES. 


VIII. 


l-\':)'tA)Q\\\l\\tM;^^^>i^^^m'^r^  ,11  ^ 


H.M.E  P. 


THEBES.       INSCRIPTIONS    OF    XVm.-)!:iX.    DYN. 


IX. 


-^'M^ 


S  i  cti 


'm^Mwmt^Am=^mm^mimi-^^ 


iD^^^a^^^iWr^^M^Ps^™^^  J  r..«^« 


5  <:  di 


i^i-^kerATr:  !i%4:S^s.s«< 


k^n^-^^m.'^m^'^m^te:^''i 


It— D  ■- 


"^h^^^lWf 


ft^5^^k^//>. 


w^m^ 


\pmim 


At  iid*.    of   At5..Ci*.«- 


c=.^*S:s  J  J 


'^"^jj 


I    A.- 


r\^°.mzt 


iiOi-=>oTir   .  .  .B  «  a-;' 


tmMB'€ 


Jra 


.2.(|*»4, 


asfigflw^ 


T^EioTni /I '^^^^  / 


O  >v       J  I.  ed*. 


ftfIlPJ}5 '^TWBIS 


IMs«St^?ifl:EliL'i^(lS 


Ot^   fy 


On,     f  ro  I 


^mr4i\ 


iwrn 


W^E3^"1  Wi;^Dt^'1fr,l>5" 


T      «•>>>*    f 


«-n  I-*       ^  is'l  "  17  '8,1         .'? 


^tefim.  'i^'-'i^nrti^ 


ii  V3 


(KlT' 


oil  ^r   -^    •" 


»<»  •- 1""  .,i 


Me.      r      e«->>''«A 


e£jE^ 


THEBES.       LIMESTONE     STELE     OF     AMENHOTEP  III.     PL.     X. 


THEBES.       BLACK    GRANITE     STELE     OF    AMENHOTEP    III.      PL.    XI. 


I 


w 


1  :8 


THEBES.   STELE  OF  AMENHOTEP  III. 


XII. 


5   ^i^>^> u:J^!:E]»y#v;>JTSf-MV,;2!^i:f.^M,tai]!Xf^  ,f^P:!!»>  ^ 


J  o  Pi:^^:  *  J:^^J  xij^iasiiBP!?:>"  2C  J . 


>^0<\i:t,ti: 


iitmMz 


1^  3->:.g<s^'i>^::':P-^igl.Ti.7;:T:p;::!!;r-)6^p,':^iP-:^^P-;:\^^  ^^ 

♦^  iE^MJ-^r.i^Pi:^;!L:K:2l</¥;^TP.p>i('z>^r^T2-.:p/jE-f  ^  kt.ii^r: 
M^Cttl^!!?^?^\^^x::iv  Pm^^  y\p.T:  ]^^>^i  Sr"  jj  <!  IP,"  ;^  y^^±i^:7\i:.W 

"  M^^PPS>^rT^>iiiW.7:P>^Jil?*^P!:^]IX^li^"r:r^T.^.T5^:^+K^^  ^s 


•en 


THEBES.   BLACK  GRANITE  STELE  OF  MERENPTAH.   PL.  XIIL 


1:8 


THEBES.       INSCRIPTION    ON    STELE    OF    MERENPTAH. 


XIV. 


ail' 


i^\m:^%mM^^mi'rmmitw.^ms.^mim:i^:>m. 


}mw?^^M^^^'^mMh.\\^^^fmm&^m"mmR 


x-i: 


-fl8^ 


'"  ^m'^.^m^Mi^^'^^rimmMmimTf^immMm  ■= 


< 


-SllP^m-dJ§?fi?Si^^liS&^4^Sts^T,iM!i',n$iS 


^Ill^iist^^^>^pilj^fMlwi^^^;*^^:asiri^^^p:li3iiJsO»y 


^.^f^E^J^aaJil  VE^^PH  V-fst^  t^;i?  T^lf.llS,^ 


111 


mmmit 


muB^muii^nTizTmra^f^  i^mr  fp?:  ?^<^ 


•  '  *ai 


niii 


:.   S 


^\my'^i:.^.>.^E^i\\sYj^B\mmMy-(^m:: 


THEBES.   OUTLINED  STELE  OF  DUI-ER-NEHEH.   PL.  XV. 


f , 


f^^-^Hiix 


1:1 


THEBES.       FOUNDATION    DEPOSITS    OF   TAUSERT. 


XVI. 


1.2, 


\-lt     aia.ze.d     Pattirif  Z.  i   -  2>  6       Coppt.r 


3  7       WooeL. 


38-4-0     5fon«.  .  yJJ^.F.P. 


1  :6 


THEBES.   FOUNDATION  DEPOSITS  OF  TAUSERT. 


XVII. 


Wki-C^  <^.  ^-<'T-.;r^Vi^s.v.^^^^v^-^-^Vh>S?~JS..--^'«s'5^ 


ddbQ 


/J^ 


^ 


a'      e 


J5 


FOUNDATION    DEPOSITS    OF    SIPTAH. 


i& 


7 


'9 


2-1 


f^ 


ilSODD 


II 


/^r:^ 


zz 


7.0 


U/.A^-F.R 


1:1 


THEBES.       FOUNDATION    DEPOSITS    OF    SIPTAH. 


XVIII. 


i.i 


r 


W./^F.  P. 


2:3 


THEBES.       FOUNDATION    JARS    OF   TAUSERT    AND    SIPTAH. 


XIX. 


smp^ 


3.     To.  u.  s  iL.r  t    Dt.^    I/. 


Ta-usert     Dt.^.V 


4.    To-M-s  e,rt      B,  V. 


S.     S  I  p  t  a^h       D.   Ill 


6.     S   i  jo  t  oL  h       D-  IV. 


^f^W, 


7.  SipiM.k  n.v. 


W 


8.  S  i^CoLk 


')rf)^vn)L7i]fLUt,i.i 


^.    £  L  /5  Cct,/i 


'/ 


/  O       S  ipta-h     D.  V. 


I^.M  F.P. 


2:3 


THEBES.       INSCRIPTIONS.    AMENHOTEP    II.   TO    MERENPTAH. 


XX. 


/.    /\mQ,n  ho  te.p  II    Limtstbne. 


^.Ta.h.u.tme&iy  \ 


n  VOLS  e . 


y 


«J.A« 


ffh 


\ 


2..      f{  m  iL,  n.  k  o  C e.  h    II     LiyyL^itoi 


3.  A  >nt  n  Kott-b  II    Umest 


S" .  Ayyie-n-ho  t<.j3    ll'.orJII' 


6   Ta-ynxJzr>-^e^s    IV 


'^S'\ 


7.  HE.  Ta-kul- rv.es f/. 


lit^jl 


8-13      M  e.  r  t.  YL  j:>  iTa.  k 


c=r^^ 


i  S 


/wt^.r.p. 


THEBES.       ASSYRIAN     HELMET,     BOWL,     AND     TOOLS.       PL.     XXI. 


1  : 4000 


THEBES.   GENERAL  PLAN  OF  TEMPLES. 


XXII. 


SIPTAH 


AMENHOTEP  II.  (SITAMEN) 
WHITE  QUEEN 


RAMESSU  II. 


I  UAZMES 


I  TAHUTMES  IV. 


KHONSUARDUS 


TAUSERT 


MERENPTAH 


1:600  THEBES.       CHAPEL    OF    QUEEN    AND    TEMPLE    OF    AMENHOTEP    M. 


XXIII. 


CXD 


O 


s 


r*^ 


r^tm?eT?s: 


Y 


III    ^  i  i 


1 


BRICK,    "SS  BRICK  XXIII  DYN..     ^<^  STONE  BASES  .  ffi3  STON  E    FOUNDATIONS. 


1:600 


THEBES.   TEMPLE  OF  TAHUTMES  IV. 


XXIV. 


BRICK  .'^  PAVEMENT. 


STONE    FOUNDATION.  ^^^^  FOUNDATION   HOLLOWS. 


1  :600 


THEBES.       TEMPLE    OF    MERENPTAH. 


XXV. 


BRICK,  W/AS,10UL     FOUNDATION         ^-^^    FOUNDATION     HOLLOWS 


1  :600 


THEBES.   TEMPLES  AND  CHAPELS. 


XXVI. 


UAZMES 


KHONSUARDUS 


TAUSERT 


SIPTAH 


^^^^^^^S 


BRICK 


^^>^  FOUNDATION     HOLLOWS         h"  IX   DEPOSITS 


•*■ 


f 


ilNDINGSECT.JULi6197. 


PLEASE  DO  NOT  REMOVE 
CARDS  OR  SLIPS  FROM  THIS  POCKET 


UNIVERSITY  OF  TORONTO  LIBRARY