(logo)
(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Open Source Books | Project Gutenberg | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Children's Library | Additional Collections

Search: Advanced Search

Anonymous User (login or join us)Upload
See other formats

Full text of "Some early medical history of the upper Desplaines Valley, Illinois"

/u/w mam sra 



97731 

iS 

Some Early Medical History of 

the Upper Desplaines Valley, 

Illinois 



^Wo^ 



W 



CLARENCE A. EARLE, Ph.B., M.D. bU»* f ^f 



Des Plaines, 







SOME EARLY MEDICAL HISTORY 

OF THE UPPER DESPLAINES 

VALLEY, ILLINOIS 



Clarence A. Earle, Ph. B., M. D. 

DESPLAINES, ILLINOIS 



Many years ago I beigan collecting 
everything I could that had any 
bearing upon the early history of 
the locality in which I live, a limited 
part of the region of the upper Des 
Plaines Valley. It has resulted in the 
assemblage of many old photos and 
daguerrotypes, many monographs, 
contracts, deeds, passports, receipts, 
bills, and very many old letters or 
copies of letters dating back to 1833. 
A judge in the state of Washington 
who had lived here wrote me several 
hundred pages of early history. Ob- 
viously the subject matter of this 
paper is but an incident in the major 
research that has engaged my atten- 
tion. 

To me the collecting of early local 
history has been an intriguing pas- 
time. I have unearthed interesting 
records from old attic trunks, from 
boxes in the lofts of out-houses, 
corn-cribs and garages. In the quest 
for early local history the word "fail- 
ure" does not exist. 

Robt. Collyer, the Unitarian preach- 
er, published a biography of A. H. 
Conant who had resided two miles 
north of where I now live. Collyer 
quoted extensively from a diary that 
Conant had kept while living here. 
This diary contained almost daily 
entries from 1836 to 1841. The idea 
of getting this record possessed me. 
Conant moved from Des Plaines to 
Geneva. A visit there netted me a 
copy of Collyer's book but no diary. 
Conant enlisted as Chaplain of the 
19th Illinois from Rockford, and died 
immediately after the battle of Stone 
River. At my first visit to Rockford 
I secured some daguerrotypes and 
many of Conant's war letters and ser- 
mons, but no diary. On my second 
visit to Rockford, I learned that when 
Conant's daughter went West she had 
left her household effects in the loft 
of a garage. I went through every- 
thing there, but still no diary. I 
returned home discouraged but un- 
deterred. 



l_\\^o\s 

On a third trip, I scoured the loft 
again but found nothing. Discour- 
aged, I came downstairs and a boy 
repairing a car, pointed to a large 
box. Lifting an old oil painting, there 
was the leather bound diary in a per- 
fect state of preservation! I turned 
this diary over to the Chicago His- 
torical Society. They very kindly 
made me a copy. It might be inter- 
esting to you to learn that this same 
A. H. Conant read a paper at the first 
meeting of the Chicago Historical 
Society. I dug out three letters in 
a little town in Washington that con- 
firms this statement. 

I am free to say that the training 
of a medical man is and should be 
the best possible preparation for one 
engaged in collecting local history. 
A medical man's status and his posi- 
tion in society gives him a distinct 
advantage over commercial makers 
of county histories. It goes without 
saying that he who does not hesitate 
to inquire into the venereal history 
of a person would not hesitate to 
peer into skeleton closets of the past. 
I wanted information as to the life 
of an early school teacher who later 
had killed a man in Minnesota. I 
located his wife in Connecticut. I 
wrote her and asked her for her hus- 
band's photo. She said I must be 
mistaken in the person, and of course 
she couldn't do anything for me. Be- 
fore I got through, I not only got his 
history and his photo, but also her 
photograph. 

I once made a trip to Northern 
Wisconsin to interview another pio- 
neer school teacher. I rang the door 
bell. A highly neurotic daughter 
opened the door rather gingerly. To 
her, I announced my mission. She 
said her mother was an invalid, and 
had recently had a stroke and could 
not see anyone. I told her that I 
was a physician and I would see to 
it that no damage would result. She 
at once admitted me. I spent a very 
pleasant hour with the old lady, 
showed her a lot of photographs of 
her childhood friends and left her 
and her daughter in a happy mood, 
after I had gotten ivhat I wanted. 
It has happened several times that 
I have been able to trade a little 
professional advice for a lot of early 
history. 

In every age a few are born before 
their time. No one knows whethetr 
these anticipations are intuitive or 



philosophic. These few seem to un- 
derstand the inadequacy of present 
day conditions and are able to visual- 
ize those needs of the future that 
the slow process of evolution takes 
years to bring about. Such a one 
was Dr. John A. Kennicott. He was 
born January 5 1802, in Montgomery 
county, (now Fulton county; , New 
York, and died June 4, 1863, at The 
Grove, Northfield Township, Illinois. 
His paternal ancestors descended 
from Roger Kennicott who came from 
Devonshire in 1660, and settled in 
Maiden, Mass. Three of his lineal 
descendants were named John. The 
fourth, named Jonathan, was the 
father of Dr. Kennicott. All had 
large families, of from six to fifteen 
children. This Jonathan married 
Jane McMillan, descendant of a wide- 
ly known Jacobite family. They 
moved from Massachusetts to New 
York at an early date and had fifteen 
children. 

The second child is the subject of 
this sketch. As a child he worked 
on the farm and orchard. According 
to his own statement, he attended 
primary school only thirty days. 
About 1823, he went to Buffalo where 
he studied medicine, taught district 
school, clerked in a drug store, and 
some of the time taking lectures at 
the medical college at Fairfield, New 
York, where he got his medical de- 
gree in 1826. 

It may be interesting to learn 
something of this medical college 
located in the wilds of central New 
York in a village that in 1861 had 
but 300 inhabitants. 

Fairfield Academy must have been 
organized in the late eighteenth cen- 
tury. In 1808, Fairfield Medical 
College was made an adjunct to Fair- 
field Academy. This institution was 
called also the College of Physicians 
and Surgeons of the Westejrn District 
of New York. In 1810 the Legislature 
granted the college $5,000, which had 
been the proceeds of a lottery. Feuds 
and jealousies among the Professors 
hindered the college's organization. 
However, at one) time Fairfield stood 
next to the University of Pennsyl- 
vania in number of students. In 1820 
an act of Legislature gave to Fair- 
field Medical College for dissection, 
the unclaimed bodies of the Auburn 
prison. Organization of the Geneva 
Medical College in 1835 and of the 
Albany Medical College in 1838 cut 



into the attendance of the Fairfield 
school to such an extent that with 
the session of 1839-40, it closed its 
doors. Not however until many dis- 
tinguished men either had taught in 
or attended this school. Three of the 
Hadleys and Asa Gray attended Fair- 
field. Dr. N. S. Davis, Sr., was an 
alumnus. 

It is altogether likely that Dr. 
Kennicott took up medicine mainly 
as a livelihood. Later in life he seems 
to have looked at it as a cultural 
study. In a letter in 1857 to his son, 
Charles, who was attending school in 
Buffalo, Dr. Kennicott writes, "It 
might not be amiss for you to accept 
the offer of your friends in Rush 
Medical College to attend a full course 
there some winter as a part of a good 
education for a pomologist, or rather 
a horticulturist. I think a course at 
Rush would be both pleasant and 
profitable. I enjoyed the study of 
medicine very much." Immediately 
after graduation Dr. Kennicott wrote 
for the pres-s in Buffalo and lectured 
on botany. He practiced medicine on 
the Welland Canal. In 1828 Dr. Ken- 
nicott visited Detroit, Mich., Sandus- 
ky, Columbus, and Cincinnati, Ohio; 
Louisville, Ky., and Natchez, Tenn.; 
spending some time at each place in 
botanizing. He lectured and practiced 
medicine near Jackson, Mississippi, 
for a while; after which he located 
in New Orleans, La. In 1830 Dr. Ken- 
nicott married Mary Shutts Ransom 
in Buffalo. In New Orleans, he was 
for a time principal of a primary 
school. He had charge of a male or- 
phanage for one year. He is credited 
with having published the first lit- 
erary, scientific and religious journal 
in New Orleans. This was called the 
"Louisiana Recorder." 

In 1834 or 1835 Dr. Kennicott's 
father and brothers took up land 18 
miles Northwest of Chicago on the 
stage route to Wisconsin, which is 
now Milwaukee Ave. This is un- 
doubtedly why in 1836 Dr. Kennicott 
came to Cook County. At this time 
there were two other doctors in this 
locality; Dr. Silas Meacham, a lineal 
descendant of Miles Standish, and Dr. 
Fred Miner. Dr. Miner's father, 
Aaron, came with him from Vermont. 
He was a Revolutionary soldier, who 
died in Elk Grove, Cook County, in 
1848, and was buried there. Eli Skin- 
ner, another soldier of the Revolu- 
tion, came to this Yankee settlement 



and was buried in the same cemetery. 
Of the three Revolutionary soldiers 
who are known to be buried in Cook 
County, the remains of two lie in this 
little country burying ground about 
five miles west of Des Plaines. The 
third, the renowned David Kennison, 
was buried in Lincoln Park. 

Although it is more than 150 years 
since the close of the war of the Re- 
volution, there is still living, at this 
writing, one real son of that war, — 
William Constant Wheeler of Marsh- 
field, Vermont. His father enlisted 
in 1780 when fourteen years of age 
and, when 76 years old, he married 
for the third time, and became the 
father of two children. William Con- 
stant is now 87 years old and in good 
health. 

As soon as Dr. Kennicott got his 
log house up he started in the active 
practice of medicine. His daughter 
told me that his rides took him as 
far north as Waukegan and as far 
south as Elgin. Some of the time he 
had five horses. 

It has been difficult to learn much 
definite data of Dr. Kennicott's treat- 
ment of diseases. I have been in- 
formed that he did not believe much 
in emetics nor in blood letting; 
though he bled a younger brother 
three times who had meningitis. Mer- 
cury in the form of calomel, and mer- 
cury with chalk were common reme- 
dies for nearly everything. His 
daughter told me he treated diph- 
theria by cauterizing the throat with 
silver nitrate stick. The medicine 
case of the early doctor smelled 
strongly of rhubarb. He did only 
minor emergency surgery. He usual- 
ly called in either Dr. Brainard or 
Dr. Freer for help. I have been un- 
able to learn that he ever attended a 
medical meeting; yet he kept in con- 
tact with the best medical men of 
Chicago; Brainard, Freer, Herrick, 
Blaney and others. 

Dr. Kennicott had made few profes- 
sional calls when he began to plant 
trees, shrubs and flowers, particularly 
fruit trees. Early in the forties he 
started the Kennicott nurseries, pro- 
bably the first in northern Illinois. A 
company still operates under that 
name. It is conceded that no one did 
more for fruit culture in the west 
than did Dr. Kennicott. He became the 
horticultural editor of the "Prairie 



Farmer" and, for a time, its editor. 
He was president of the Illinois State 
Horticultural Society, and secretary 
of the State Agricultural Society. He 
edited the first two volumes of this 
organization. He was the first presi- 
dent of the American Pomological So- 
ciety which met in 1848. He seems 
to have been on intimate terms with 
many of the leading scientists, such 
as Kirtland of Cleveland, Latham of 
Milwaukee, Thomas and the two 
Downings of New York, and the thun- 
dering J. B. Turner of Jacksonville. 
Few did more than Dr. Kennicott to 
secure the final establishment of the 
U. S. Dept. of Agriculture. It is said 
that Zachary Taylor promised Kenni- 
cott that he would organize a separate 
Department of Agriculture if elected. 
Taylor's untimely death prevented 
this. Dr. Kennicott's name was prom- 
inently mentioned, even in eastern 
papers, as the logical head of this 
cabinet position, should it be organ- 
ized. 

Dr. Kennicott was a busy country 
doctor, and his editorial and agricul- 
tural society connections must have 
taken much of his time. What I be- 
lieve to have been his greatest work, 
was what he did for real education in 
this country. Here was a great coun- 
try with unlimited possibilities for 
agricultural and industrial develop- 
ment, yet about all that the colleges 
turned out were preachers and classi- 
cal graduates. As late as 1850 Turner 
said that there were 269 classical 
schools in the U. S. and not one agri- 
cultural school worthy of the name, 
although the vast majority of people 
were farmers. 

A letter written in 1838 by my 
father, who was attending an academy 
in Vermont, states that he "is study- 
ing Greek, Latin and French," and 
apparently not taking English. While 
the classics are not stressed as much 
as formerly, in my opinion more time 
in school should be given to the study 
of English, of modern languages and 
of natural sciences. I was a member 
of a High School Board for twenty- 
two years. I recall with dismay a 
farmer boy who, through the advice 
of a classically trained principal, 
studied Latin four years. For four 
years this boy walked three miles 
night and morning, putting in one 
fourth of his time to a study that 
touch his daily life less than a falling 
star. Intrenched behind the prac- 



tices and traditions of ages, coupled 
with the greed, envy and jealousy of 
sectarianism, the academies and col- 
leges of the day presented a formida- 
ble obstacle to the establishment of 
any but classical schools. Though 
many undoubtedly recognized the in- 
adequacy of scholastic education, few 
bad the temerity to defend a more 
useful training. Of those who fought 
for the newer education, the name 
of the impoverished but militant 
Jonathan B. Turner outshines all the 
rest. 

At that memorable Farmers' Con- 
vention meeting at Granville, Illinois, 
in September 1851, Turner suggested 
the plan of an industrial University 
in each state. The following March 
Turner announced for the first time 
the idea of national grants of land 
for the foundation and support of 
State Industrial Universities. It took 
eleven years to get this idea through 
Congress under what is known as 
The Morrill Bill. 

This eleven year period of gestation 
that it took to enact this legislation 
was a stormy period. Into the fight, 
the enthusiastic Dr. Kennicott threw 
the full force of his persuasive per- 
sonality and energy. His trenchant 
pen never dried, in his advocacy of 
the newer education. Several con- 
ventions were called in Illinois to dis- 
cuss the merits of this new idea. Dr. 
Kennicott was a most prominent and 
influential member as well as the 
chairman of most of the meetings. 
The Illinois Legislature was influ- 
enced to memoralize Congress. All 
over the country papers took up the 
"Illinois Idea" as did many legisla- 
tures. Dr. Kennicott spent much time 
lobbying in Springfield while the 
legislature was in session. On one 
such trip he had to borrow money 
from the governor to pay his bills 
and to buy a ticket home! 

In 1857 Senator Morrill introduced 
this Land Grant Bill into the Senate. 
Kennicott made trips to Washington 
in the interest of this bill. I have 
records of his interviews with the 
log rolling, selfish members of Con- 
gress. Buchanan vetoed the bill. It 
finally became a law when Lincoln 
signed the act in 186:.'. 

Sixty-nine colleges and universities 
have been benefited by this act of 
Congress. I have given some of the 
history of this legislation, first, be- 



cause in my opinion, next to the act 
of 1787, this Land Grant Act stands 
as the greatest potential stroke for 
education ever enacted. Second, 
though the concrete idea was sug- 
gested by Turner and introduced into 
Congress by Morrill, its final enact- 
ment in my opinion was in a large 
measure due to that persistent, in- 
domitable country doctor, John A. 
Kennicott. 

In politics Dr. Kennicott was a 
Whig. In religion he was a liberal. 
There are no records that he ever 
attended church. Robert Collyer, the 
Unitarian preacher, officiated at an 
early funeral of one of the family. 
Dr. Kennicott was the father of five 
boys and two girls. All have passed 
away. It was my pleasure to know 
all except the two older boys. Kenni- 
( iitt's most noted child was Robert, 
a distinguished naturalist. The his- 
tory of the classification of the fauna 
of this country can never be com- 
plete without mention of his work. 

Dr. Kennicott was not above five 
feet five inches in height, and was 
very stoop shouldered. His face was 
seamed with deep lines. His eyes 
beamed with expression and flashed 
with each new thought. In any as- 
semblage he would attract attention. 
He had the gift of friendliness and 
hospitality, but when occasion arose 
he could be a doughty opponent. He 
loved youth and youth turned to him 
with intuitive trust. He fought many 
battles for causes and for friends, 
but never for his own advantage. 
Geniality was one of his most marked 
characteristics. This is evident even 
in his grandchildren. Dr. Kennicott 
was a loyal friend. His innate cour- 
tesy and charm of manner made "him 
approachable by all whom he chanced 
to meet. He had traveled much. 
He attended many public gatherings 
in his own state, and in other states. 
His home was a meeting place for 
leaders in the natural sciences and 
in medicine. His procedures were 
direct. He was as transparent as a 
child. There never was a doubt as 
to his convictions, and he hated 
double-dealing in others. The selfish 
ax-grinding politicians excited Dr. 
Kennicott's unmitigated disgust. He 
was an idealist who pursued realism. 

Literally Dr. Kennicott died in his 
boots. Powells history states that "a 
call was issued during the latter part 
of May, 1863, for the Sixth Industrial 



Convention to meet in Springfield, on 
June 9, 1863. This call was signed 
by twelve well known leaders, headed 
by the enthusiastic Dr. Kennicott." 
But the "Old Doctor" was not there 
to answer the call. He had passed 
away on June 4. On May 23, 1863, 
eleven days before his death, Dr. 
Kennicott wrote to his old friend Col. 
Hodge of Buffalo. Probably this was 
the last letter Kennicott ever wrote. 
It is so expressive that I shall give 
it: 

"My dear old Friend: Are you still 
alive? I still live but scarcely 
breathe. For two months I have 
been at death's door with laryngitis 
complicafed with heart disease, etc. 
and lately with rheumatic pains in 
the chest. Dr. Freer attended me 
first and I expect him and Dr. Brain- 
ard out tomorrow. It was thought I 
could not live, as I breathe with 
great difficulty, and often have to sit 
up 20 hours in the 24, as I suffocate 
if recumbent. The worst is I can't 
eat nor exercise. I now write for 
the first time in two weeks. I have 
been up since half past three A.M. 
I now write at six A.M. Very warm. 
Let me hear from you. I may suffer 
for this imprudence. But you and I 
should not neglect each other while 
we can hold a pen. I trust you do 
not suffer as I have of late. I have 
wished for death more than once, but 
I don't want to die if I have any 
chance of being comfortable again, 
and I seem to stand a heap of killing. 
Strange how much a man can live 
through. God be with you." 

"Your old friend the Old Doctor." 



As lite years roll, as wealth in- 
creases, as urbanization of the prair- 
ies proceeds and the haunts of the 
deer and other wild game are cut up 
by miles of hard smooth roads, I see 
a tendency to exaggerate the trials 
and vexations of the Pioneer Country 
Doctor. My father was a country 
doctor. My own professional life in 
a rural community reaches hack 
nearly half a century. I have gone 
through the horseback, the two- 
wheeled carl, and the buggy age of a 
country practice. Even so they were 
safer if not pleasanter hours than I 
now experience in going over the 
same territory in my car. In the 
early days I was summoned in per- 
son by a messenger whom I knew. I 
knew the people who desired my ser- 
vices. If I had any money in my 
pocket I never thought of leaving it 
when called out at night. The Pio- 
neer Doctor never feared being rob- 
bed, kidnapped, or murdered when 
making a night call. I might gel a 
leg scratched riding along a hedge 
row or my horse might stumble but 
that was nothing compared to being 
run into by a drunken driver nowa- 
days. One could catch naps riding 
behind a faithful horse. I never 
dozed but once in my car. When I 
awoke I was in a ditch. I do not 
wish to minimize the hardships of 
the Pioneer Country Doctor for they 
were many. Nor do I desire to de- 
tract from the halo of glory and 
glamor that a generous posterity has 
accorded him, but as I see it human 
nature was the same in the early 
days as now. The problems of life 
were similar and are met today with 
the same spirit of helpfulness and 
earnestness of purpose — if not quite 
the fortitude — as in the days of yore, 







||^0253130;