The Speaker
2 iUtitrlu of ^Jolitifc;, i-rttne, ^ririirr, anti the vlrts.
RECISTEHKli A^ A NEWSPAPER AT THE GENEKAI. IMST OFFICE)
[r II' I'.IA-.r> AND VDRHICU TRANSMf^SIOM.
Vol. IV.— No. 85.]
SATURDAY, AUGUST 15, 1891.
[I'RICE 6d.
NEW MODEL
REMINGTON
STANDARD TYPEWRITER.
For Fifteen Years the Standard, and to-day the most perfect development
of the \\Titing machine, embodying the latest and highest achievements of
Inventive and mechanical skill. We add to the Remington every improvement
that study and capital can secure.
WYCKOFF, SEAMANS & BENEDICT.
Principal Office— Loudon : 100, GRACECHURCH STREET, EC.
(.COKXEK OF LEADENHAI.L STREET.')
FRY'S
" I have never tasted Cocoa
that I like so well."— 5/^ C. A.
Cameron, M.D., Fresidefif Royal
College of Surgeons, Ireland.
PURE CONCENTRATED
Half a Tea-spoonful is
sufficient to make a cup
of most delicious Cocoa.
COCOA
PITKEATHLY
CUM LITHIA.
The only Rational and Successful Treatment in Use
for Gout, Gouty Eczema, Rheumatism,
Gravel, Sciatica, &c.
The late Dr. Matthews Dunca.s, writing under date March 4th, 1888, says : — " I
use the Aerated Pilkeathly Water largely, anit value it, and find it is valued by
patients."
To be had of all Chetnista and Mineral Water Dealers.
.SOLE PROPRIETORS—
REID & DONALD, Chemists, Perth.
CADBURY'S
COCOA
ABSOLUTELY PURE therefore BEST.
CADBDRT'S COCOA contains in a concentrated form admirable nutritive
flesh-forming qualities, strength, and staying power.
Tliose wlio INTEND BUYIN& a TYPEWRITER
should write for our Circular
giving Eight reasons why the
BAR-LOCK IS THE BEST.
THOSE WHO DO NOT THINK
OF BLYING A TYPEWRITER
should write for our Circular
setting forth the advantages
of the
BAR-LOCK.
THE TYPEWRITER CO., Ltd., 12, QtTEEN VICTORIA STREET, LONDON, E.C.
LOC.il .IGU.STS I.X .4LI. DISTRICTS
GRESHAM
LIFE ASSURANCE
SOCIETY.
Head Office :
ST. MILDRED'S HOUSE, POULTRY, LONDON, E.G.
West End Branch: 2, WATERLOO PLACE, S.w.
Founded 1848.
ASSETS EXCEED £4,450,000.
THERE is NOTHING DESIRABLE in LIFE
ASSURANCE which the SOCIETY does not
FURNISH CHEAPLY and INTELLIGIBLY.
THOMAS G. ACKLAND, F.I.A, F.S.S., .Actuary aitj .M.ina^^r.
J AS. H. SCOTT, .'itc-tm-y.
FIRST ESTABLISHED 1825.
FOR INFANTS.
ADMIRABLY ADAPTED TO THE WANTS OF
INFANTS.
RICH IN BONE-FORMING AND FLESH-PRODUCING
ELEMENTS.
PROMOTES THE HEALTHY ACTION OF THE BOWELS.
BEST AND CHEAPEST.
11
THE SPEAKER.
[August 15, 1891.
The Speaker.
THE LEADING LTBEBAL WEEKLY,
PRICE 6d.
THE SPEAKER devotes special attention to Literary Ne\ys and Criticism, great
care being taken to keep this department of the journal free from any suspicion
of favouritism on the one hand, and of sectarianism or narrow-mindedness on the other.
The Staff of Writers includes many men of established eminence in the World of
Letters, as well as specialists, who treat with unquestioned authority the Scientific, Artistic,
and Economic Problems of the day.
NAMES OF SOME OF THE CONTRIBUTORS TO "THE SPEAKER":—
The Right Hon. W. E. GLADSTONE, M.P.
The Right Hon. JOHN MORLEY, M.P.
The Right Hon. SIR C. \V. DILKE.
The Right Hon. LORD .•\CTON.
The Right Hon. LORD HOEHOUSE.
The Right Hon. LORD HOUGHTON.
The Right Hen. G. J. SHAW'.LEFEVRE, U.V.
SIR C. GAVAN DUKFY, K.C.M.G.
SIR THOMAS FARKER.
The Right Hon. SIR LYON TLAYFAIR, M.P.
JAMES ERYCE, M.P.
SIR HENRY ROSCOE, M.P., F.R.S.
PROF. NORMAN LOCKYER, F.R.S.
T. CLIFFORD ALLBUl I , M.D., F.R.S.
LORD EDMOND FITZ.MAURICE.
SIR W. W. HUNTER.
JOHN DILLON, ALP.
W. A. McAKlHUR, JLP.
WILLIAM OKRIEN, .M.P.
R. B. HALDANE, y.C, .M.P.
AUGUSTINE PIRRELL, .M.P.
GEO. W. E. RUSSELL.
PROF. E. A. FREE.MAN.
Principal FAIRHAIRN (.Manifiekl College, O.\ford).
THOMAS HODGKIN, LL.D.
Canon MacCOLL.
Mrs. J. R. GREEN.
FREDERIC HARRISON.
Dr. R. GARNETT.
F. C. MONTAGUE (Oriel College, Oxford).
OSCAR BROWNING.
PROF. W. .MINTO.
OSCAR WILDE.
C. H. FIRTH.
EVELYN ABBOTT.
HERBERT PAUL.
R. SPENCE WATSON, LL.D.
RICHARD WHITEING.
GEORGE AUGUSTUS SALA.
I Rev. STOPFORD A. BROOKE.
J. S. MANN.
A. T. QUILLER-COUCH.
JAMES PAVN.
J. M. BARRIE.
T. HALL CAINE.
GRANT ALLEN.
AUSTIN DOBSON.
HENRY JAMES.
ARTHUR GALTON.
K. V. STOUT.
S. R. PHELPS.
L. F. AUSTIN.
(;. R. BENSON.
Kev. G. A. S.MITH (.Aberdeen).
C. E. MALLET.
Dr. BIKKEECK HILL.
SUTHERLAND EDWARDS.
W. ERASER RAE.
PROF. W. E. AYRTON.
FREDERICK WEDMORE.
WALTER ARMSTRONG.
PROF. W. WALLACE (O.xford).
A. PATCHETT MARTIN.
R. K. DOUGLAS.
ARTHUR SY.MONS.
BEATRICE POTTER.
ARABELLA B. FISHER.
ARTHUR SIL>GWICK.
PROF. ROBERTSON SMITH.
COSMO MONKHOUSE.
A. TAYLOR INNES.
JOHN O'NEIL.
MICHAEL DAVITT.
ANDREW LANG.
REV. T. W. FOWLE.
H. W. LUCY.
KARL BLIND,
H. H. JOHNSTON, C.B,
W. SUMMERS, M.P.
POULTNEY BIGELOW.
EDMUND GOSSE.
CHURTON COLLINS.
J. SCOTT KELTIE.
HIS EXCELLENCY SPENCER WALPOLE.
J. S. BLACK.
B.^RRY PAIN.
A. B. WALKLEY.
PROF. S. R. GARDINER.
J. K. LAUGHTON.
DR. J. G. Mcpherson.
PROF. G. G, A. MURRAY.
JUSTIN McCarthy, .m.p.
MRS. RICHMOND RITCHIE.
W. S. LILLY.
IIEORGE MOORE.
PROF. LODGE.
J. henry PELHAM.
SYDNEY BUXTON, M.P.
Rev. S. BARING-GOULD.
Col. LONSDALE HALE.
R. C. LEHMANX.
E. FAIRFIELD.
JOHN MACDONNELL.
H. W. MASSINtiHAM.
The Rev. DR. BARRY.
C. P. -ILBERT.
TIGHE HOPKINS.
SIDNEY WKEB.
FELIX VOLKHOVSKY.
T. WEMYSS REID. IRome).
R. BONGHI (Member of the Italian Parliament
GEORGE VON BUNSEN (Berlin).
MONS. MIJ.VTOVITCH (e.\-Minister of Foreign
.\ffairs for Servia).
E. L. GODKIN (New York).
COUNT UCO BALZANI.
&c. &c. &c.
The Si'EAKER is read in all quarters of the world, and is everywhere recognised as
an authority on Political, Social, and Literary Questions.
Owing to the class amongst which it circulates, The Si'E.\ker, as an Advertising
Medium, has a special value. Rates may be obtained on application at the Offices,
115, Fleet Street, London, E.C.
The Speaker is on sale every Saturday morning at the Railway Bookstalls and
principal Newsagents of the United Kingdom.
Copies are delivered to Subscribers by post early on Saturday in all parts of the
Kingdom.
It is earnestly requested that i^-liere any difficu/fy is experienced in procuring copies, the fact may be
communicated to the Publishers.
PUBLISHED FOR THE PROPRIETORS BY
CASSEL;. &. COMPANY, Limited, La Belle Sauvage, Ludgate Hill, London.
August 15, 1891.]
THE SPKAlvEll.
ui
PAOK
Public Aitaiks 181
Mr. 13ALIOURS Mamikmo 183
The New Humanitakiamsm i8.(
" y-V/.i/rv" 18;
The E(;vrTiAN Question Again ... 186
The Naval .Manoivrks 18'.
mu. i.idiikkdai.e on the ."situation ... 187
Chronicle ok Foreign .Affairs ... i88
The International Health C'un-
OKEss. By One of the I'rcsiilcms ... loo
James Rissell Loweli 191
ClLASCOW I'HorKSSIllfi ANDTIIEH! WiiKK In2
CONTENTS.
Lamennais
Out of the U'oklh
The VoL'Ni; Citizen at I'lav
Open (Juestions. iv.— Wh.ii can wc- do
for ihc Critics? '
The Week
A I'KENCIl TkOI'IIET OI- ICviL
.-V CoRKECTEi) Contempt. By (J.
Verse : 1'rom the Mountains
Letters to the Uoitor : —
Thir .'Jitualion in Irclanti
M.P.'s as Company Directors
PAGE
"<>4
19(5
i>'7
200
A I.ITERAKV CAL'SERIE.
Reviews: —
Tl)<r Lalxpur Movenienl in America
.Mci.in<f*ia ...
I'rant.- and Russia — Cndtr the
J'liapire
I-ai|y Wilde's Kss.ays
N'itiorian Poets
Engraved Ijcms
Sliilliug Fiction
Two liook Ijuides ...
Kicardi) for tlic I'eople
l-'ir-it Iiiipressions ...
PAGE
By .V T. Q. C. 202
First
203
204
205
206
206
207
2C8
209
209
210
SAMPSON LOW. MARSTON & COMPANY'S
NO W READ Y,
AT A I. I. BOOKSELl.EK
THE BIOGRAPHY OF THE
Rt. Hon. W. E. Gladstone,
By G. W. E. RUSSELL.
BEING THE NEW \OLLME I.\ "I HE QUEENS PRIME
.MINISTERS" SERIES.
Cratvn Svo, cloth, •with new Plwtograviirr Portrait, price 3s. 61L
The WORLD. — " Written in the manly and independent spirit which we should
expect in one of his lineage. . . . An honc>t l^-^jk."
The S.VTURDAV A'£r/£:;C.— " .Mr. Rus:,ell» book is enriched by the
recollections of some of Mr. Gladstone's most eminent contemporaries, and by
records which they have placed at his disposal."
The SFE.-iKER. — " .-X volume which wp may specially commend as the most
attractive and authoritative historj* of the man with whom it deals that has yet been
given to the world."
The D.H/EV XEII'S.—"Mr. Russell has done his work with sound judgment
and in excellent taste. ... A worthy offering at the shrine of patriotism and
genius."
T/te DAILY TELECR.-iPH.— ' ■\ singularly vivid and complete picture of
one of the most striking figures of the \'ictorian era. Mr. Russell has done some-
thing to enable the Knglish people, even where they differ most from Mr. Glad-
stone's policy, to understand him better, and therefore to respect and admire him
&c.
&c.
Notice.— -■' Special Large Paper Edition of " THE QUEEN'S
PRIME MINISTERS " SERIES, uriciiy iimitcd to ^jo
Copies for Eiii:'a)ia aiiJ .Inuri a, ami printed on Hand-made
Paper, is in preparation. Orders taketi orly for the Complete
Set at FOUR GUINH.\S net. Pr::pcctus on application.
THE RURAL ECONOMY AND AGRI-
CULTURE OF AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND. A. seen by Robert
\S'ALLALt:, I .I.S., r.K.S.th'..::. J, I'rufc.-_r of A;,TituUurcand Rural Economy
in ihc University of Edinburgh, Author of "India in 1887, " " Farm Live-
stock of Great Britain," &c. With 3 Maps, 80 Full-page Plates, and 20 Text
Illustrations. Demy Svo, cloth, ;^i is. net.
Professor Wallace gives, as the result of personal obscr\'aiion, a vcrj- complete
and very instructive account of the agricultural methods and appliances in ii^e
throughout the principal Australian Colonics." — The Thufs.
FOUR WELSH COUNTIES : a Holiday
i:.. M .:■ ':■ !■:■ ..■- , L-:' ....'. \-\'-:\ :..-;).. ,a,d Pembroke. By E. A.
Kii.NER. With Illustrations, Crown Svo, cloth, 5s,
POWER THROUGH REPOSE. By Annie
I'avson Call. .'--:ii;i'.l (_ru\%[i :■. ^j, Liuti., .,-.. ■.!.
Full of hints for the prevention and cure of nervous dt.M!a>>e, and, as such, should
appeal very powerfully to a larije section of the public." — Tkc Globe.
XEW NOVELS AT ALL THE LIBRARIES.
DONALD ROSS OF HEIMRA.
lUj U JLLIAM JiLACK,
Author of " In Far Lochaber," "A Princess of Thule," &c.
3 vuU., crown Svo, chth.
" .\n admirable stor>'." — Ath^furui'i.
*' Its interest never flags. There is much delicious humour." — Scotsman.
" It is soothing and invigorating to turn to Mr. William Black's delightful pages
after wandering for a time through the leagues of drearj- commonplace of less gifted
uritcr- \ bri-k ami pit tl;^t■^.luc story." — /^'a/Zy Tchgraph.
CESAR'S COLUMN : a Story of the Twen-
ticth Century-, lly Ii.nattls Oon.neli-V, Author of " Ragnarok," "At-
','-•!■■," iv . .\':*'^ ri — '. ! ■ - -.}.;■-; ..1 Crown Svo, cloth extra, 3s. 6d.
A MAN'S CONSCIENCE. By Avery Mac-
Ai.i'iNE. -• vols., crown Svo, cloth, 21s.
" An e.\tremely interesting and wcl'.-writtcn slor>-." — Scotsman.
London : SAMPSON LOW. MARSTON & CO., Limited ; St. Dunstan's House, Fetter Lane. Fleet Street. E.C.
MESSRS. MACMILLAN & GO.'S NEW BOOKS.
MESSRS. MACMIIJ.AN C-^ CO, % to annoume that MA'. KUnVARD KIPLIXG'S N^'l^ Volutiu, - LIFES HANDICAP :
STORIES OF MIXE OWN PEOPLE;' will be ready on August 14 at all Libraries atiJ Booksellers, priu 6s.
MESSRS. MACMILLAN ^ CO. also beg to amtoance that MR. MARION CRAlVFORI>'S New Noz-cl, ''THE WITCH OF
Prague;^ is now ready at all Libraries and Booksellers, in j Vols., price j/s. 6d. MR, CRAWFORD'S recent Novell
'■'■ K'HALED: AN EASTERN .STORY," is still on sale, 2 Vols., priee iss.
THE HISTORY OF HUMAN MARRIAGE, liy Edward Westermarck, Ph.D., Lecturer on Sociolog)- at the
St. J amks's Ga/ktte. — " As re-ards the currctncss of hi7> facts and arguments, it must here suffice to quote the o[.'ir.ian of Mr. Alfred WalLicc. who anticipate* that
the verdict of independent thinkers on most of the (li--puted points will Ijc in favour of Mr. Westermarck. In any case wc may admire the boldncs.-. and lucidity with which
his views arc stated, and the enormous mass of evidence he has collected in supjKirt of them. Even if i.nc rejects all his thc\,'rie>, the book is fiill of interotinc .inJ useful
inforni.ition. While sociotoKists will exercise themselves over the chapters on the hypothesis of promiscuity, 011 >exual selection, and the prohibition of marriage l.«twccn
kindrc 1. the less advanced inquirer will be diverted by the history* of courtship amongst jirimitivc and saxagc j>coplc, the description of « *
'ly the rem.irk^ on ihc duration of marriage."
\-7inous mamage ceremonies., oTt iC
Foolscap Svo, cloth, price as. 6d. nett.
LAPSUS CALAMI. By J. K. S. New Edition, with considerable omissions and addiu
Of the new ctiition the author
a t}iou>.ind coi)ii_-s. Nc.iriy half tlv
/jS nuinh-rtrtt c.^fies, printed on demy Sio. Dutch handmade paper, each sijpted /^y the Authc^.
s.iys:— "I now present to the world a new 'Lapsus Calami.' such as the tirst wouVi have I'ccn tf
; ..kl l.rjnl; i> onutted, and more than half of this book i> new."
had aiitiupatcd a rapid sole of
THE ELEMENTS OP POLITICS. By Hknry Sidgwick, Litt.D., Knightbridge Professor of Moral Ph
iln-ii^nhv.
Cambridge. Price 14s. nctt.
DAPHNE AND OTHER POEMS
85
.NliW VOLf.ME OF POKMS.
By Frederick Texxvsox, Author of " Isles of Greece ; Sappho and
AC
CO.,
L o PJ 13 o rj.
IV
THE SPEAKER.
[August 15, 1891.
In handsome demy Svo, cloth, price 7s. 6d.
HISTORY OF CORE A,
Ancient and Modern.
WITH DESCRIPTION OF MANNERS AND CUSTOMS,
LANGUAGE AND GEOGRAPHY.
Maps and Illustrations.
B^ I^EA^. JOKlsr R-OSS,
Seven Years KcsiJent in Manelniria.
" Mr. Ross's Historj- contains a vast mass of valuable in-
formation derived from Chinese documents, for which he can
claim the gratitude of the student of Chinese history." —
Spectator.
K\%o, by the same .Vuthor, price 7s. 6cl.
TEE MANCHUS.
Reigning Dynasty of China:
THEIR RISE AND PROGRESS.
"Mr. Koss writes in a most tolerant spirit, and we know
of no other work which ofters so full and exhaustive an account
of the manners and history of the Chinese as the one now
before us. Mis book is nominally a history of the Rise and
Progress of the Manchus, but it is in reality a vivid picture
of the actual condition of the Chinese people. His chapters
on the Manchu Imperial Family, the Chinese Official .System,
the Army, Ta.\ation, and Slavery, are most valuable con-
tributions to our literature upon Foreign States." — ll'cstininster
ELLIOT STOCK, 62, Paternoster Row, London, E.G.
KECAN PAUL, TRENCH, TRUBNER 8c CO.'S LIST.
CANON CHEYNE'S BAMPTON LECTURE.S.
THE ORIGIN AND RELIGIOUS CONTENTS OF
THE PSALTER, in tlit- Lisht of Old Testament Critici-ni, ai-.l the History
ot Religions. By T. K. Cheyne, D.D., Canon of Rochester. Demy S\o, i5s.
" Dr. Cheyne has long been recognised as one of the most learned and devout of
ihc modern school of Oxford theologians. These qualities are displayed in his
Bampton Leniures." — Times.
EIGHTEENTH EDITION.
ENIGMAS OF LIFE. By W. R. Greg. With a Pre-
f.uury .Mcinnii. Lditcd l.y hU Wife. Crown Svo, 6s.
" The eighteenth edition of one of the most popular books of our day is enriched
by a prefatory memoir and contributions from the pens of friends, which brini; the
author before us with singular vividness, .ind which cont.iin passages of rare literary
beauty." — S/'cclat<n:
Crown S\o, with Frontispicirc, s^-
THE HISTORY OF ST. MARTIN'S CHURCH,
CANTEKBURY. A Monograph by the Rev. C. F. Routledge, Canon of
Camcrbury.
AN OLD SHROPSHlifiE "oak. By the late John
Wool" W'akiek. Edited by Richakd Garnett, LL.D.
" Two more priceless volumes of * An Old Shropshire Dale.' Mr, Warter's extra-
ordinary' actiuaintance with literature, strong local attachment, and love of nature
and mankind have given him a unique position among literary antiquaries." —
Speaker,
"Interesting to historians and antiquarians; great learning and much curious
information is displayed in its pages." — Scottish Leader.
With numerous Plans and Illustrations.
BURIED CITIES AND BIBLE COUNTRIES. By
Ge'JK!,e Si. Cl..\lK. L.iiu;!.- >:..■■.'. h :vo, 7-.. Ci'..
" Mr. St. Clair's long experience as .t lecturer for the Palestine Exploration
Fund entitles him to speak on these subjects with authority." — Times,
NEW NOVEL AT ALL LIBRARIES.
BONNIE KATE : a Story from a Womairs Point of
View. By Mks. Lcitm Adams. 3 Vols.
LONDON: PATERNOSTER HOUSE, CHARING CROSS ROAD, W.C.
PROFESSIONAL AUTHORS.
WANTED for a M.'VG.VZINE, exciting Short Stories.
Maximum, 3,000 words ; payment One Guinea per
1,000. Address, "Outward Bound'' Publishing Co.,
77, St. John Street, E.G.
CHATTO & WINDUS'S NEW BOOKS.
LIFE OF JANE WELSH CARLYLE.
By Mr^. Alkxam^kk Ireland, Author of " Selections from the Works of
Charles Readc." With Portrait and Facsimile Letter. Small demy Svo,
cloth extra, 7s. 6d.
" This life of Mrs. Carlylc is a sweet and sad story, told with all tenderness and
sympathy. Wc have the whole tale of her life put together with .symmetry." — Daily
Xc~MS.
"The volume is deeply interesting, and Mrs. Ireland has done her work so
well that the biography deserves to rank very highly in Carlj-le literature," —
Morning Post.
" Mrs. Ireland's hook is no mere echo. It is a careful, earnest, and independent
piece of literary work." — Scotsman,
" Mrs. Ireland's volume is the best balanced and most authoritative study of Mrs.
Carlyle that has yet been published." — Academy.
" .Many people will be grateful for this sensible presentation of the facts of the
case, and for the skilful manner in which the salient incidents of a pathetic story* are
grouijcd in this gracefully written volume." — Leeds Mercury.
"This is a most welcome addition to the books which have to do with the life of
Thomas Carlyle and his wife. . . . Mrs. Ireland has added some most suggestive
material to the stock previou>ly available." — Standard.
A NEW HUMOROUS TRAVEL BOOK.— Cro-.vn p--. - i-rh ^vtr.-i. -. i'^..
TWO GIRLS ON A BARGE.
By V. Cecil Cotes. With 44 Illustrations by F. H. Townsend.
LIFE OF JAMES BOSWELL (of Auchinleck) ;
\\\\\\ an Account ^ >f his Sayin^-s. iJ.'ii:^-. .-ind Writings. By Pkkcv Fit/-
GERALD, M..\. \\'iih 4 Portraits. 2 vols., cemy £vo, cloth extra, 24s.
\Sept. 10.
LESSONS IN ART. By Hume Nisbet. AVith 22
! .lc^illlilc■ Illustrations. Crown £vo, cloth e.vtra, ss. 6d. \Shortly.
A NEW BOOK OF THE -LOOKING BACKWARD" CL.\SS.
On September i, crown Svo, cloth extra, 6s.
FREELAND: a Social Anticipation, By Dr.
TiiKuDOR Hekt^ka. Translated by Arthur Ka.'.sc-.'.
'• Early last ye?r Dr. Hertzka, a well-known Viennese political economist, pub-
lished a book entitled ' Freeland : a Social Anticipation.' The book quickly ran
through suveral large editions, and before the year ended societies were being formed
in different parts of Germany and Austria preparatory to the organisation of a colony
in «'hich Dr. Hertzka's new economic views might be practically tested. The author
has been called a ' high priest of the Manchester School,' and ' one of the most acute
of the acute epigones of Ricardo.' " — Gentleman's Magazine.
NEW AND CHEAPER EDITION, REVISED AND CORRECTED.
Crown Svo, cloth extra, 3s. 6d.
MYTHS AND DREAMS. By Edward Clodd,
Autli>.i uf' I lie Muiy ■'!" Citau >:;. ■
" The author of that charming book, ' The Childhood of the World,' has returned
at last, in a delightful volume, to his first love, and has given us, in surprisingly
^uiall compass, a summary of all that has been thought or proved of late years about
the origin of myths and popular religions. His pleasant little book skims so lightly
over the whole ground of comparative mythology, without dwelling too long upon
controverted points, that the general reader as well as the professed anthropologist
cannot fail to extiact froni it an immense amount both of amusement and protit. The
style is t-a.^y, incisive, and often brilliant ; the examples are carefully and piquanlly
chosen ; and the book as a whole is a welcome contribution to the literature of the
subject with which it dtisXs."— Fall Mall Gazette.
XEIV LIBRARY XOVELS.
OLGA'S CRIME.
■ i ' i:t iL(i f. iT Lite."
By Frank Barrett, .\uthor of
K..U. {Shortly.
DUMARESQ'S DAUGHTER. By Grant Allen,
.\i;t!i-t .'f '■ I !:'■ l':;I^, ,.I >:!',-ii;. ■' i : '■ flevil's T'le." &c. 3 vols.
[S/iortly.
MISS MAXWELL'S AFFECTIONS. By Richard
PiOLi-., Auttiur ol * Ju^i Inipcuinieiii. - \'-i>. [S/tortly.
THE FOUNTAIN OF YOUTH: a Novel of
Adventure. \W Kkas.mus Dawson, M.B. Fruited by Pall Devon.
Willi J Ilhi>ir;uions by Hume Ni>bet. Crown Svo, cloth extra, 3s. 61!.
'* * The Fountain of Youth " is to be commended to every one who likes a rattling
good story, full of fun, and abounding in incidents of the most startling and sensa-
tional character. . . . It is seldom that a scoundrel is depicted with such power.
. . . Whether we regard it> humour, or its pathos, or the remarkable descrip-
tions of things seen or heard in lands as strange to must people as any under the sun»
the work is one which ever>' reader will enjoy." — Scotsman.
BROOKE FINCHLETS DAUGHTER. By Marv
Al. I I. .. r.-t :^.^ ili;;-[ra[^d Iu..r.-.l-. - -. , :.; .,., , -. od.
" Fearfully and woiiderfully tragic is the life uf ' Brooke Finchley's Daughter,'
and strangely ingenious is the method adopted by Miss Albert of guiding her heroine
through il" 1.ih\ riiithiTi' :! :i/.s of a mysterious and distressing parentage to the
happy cu! :i interesting heroines at the end of their sorrows."—
Clasgo:^- :
ARMOREL OF LYONESSE : a Romance of To-day.
\,\ \S .\LTEK liiivANT. With 12 ^li^lvtr.alo;l-^ i>y h . K;irii;ird. Cbea[)er Edition,
crown gvo, cloth c.vtra, 3-;. 6d. \Shortly.
"Mr. Bcsant has seldom, if everj written a better or more interesting storj*.
When we compare it with average fiction, we feel almost inclined to fall down and
worship the volume."— .S/t-n^Yr.
London: CHATTO & WINDUS, 214, Piccadilly. W.
The Speaker
SATURDAY, AUGUST 1.",, 1891.
PUBLIC AFFAIRS.
Tin; Walsall olriti<iri. wliidi resulti'd in the return
of Ml{. lIol.liKN. till' Liljcral i-aiululatf, bj' a majority
of .■)."!!) votes, aseoiiipared witii Siit C'li.Mti.KS I'\)USTi':n's
majority of 1,077 in ISS."), was no (lisa|)i)oiiit ment to
those Liberals who were ae(inniiile(i with thr
circumstances of the constituency. It \\oulil of
course have been more satisfactory if we had
maintaineil the ISK.") majoi'ity. But the position
of Silt I'liAWi.KS FousTKis was an exceptional one at
Walsall as well as in the House of Commons, and it
was notorious that many jjersous who had steadily
sii])ported "the old membi'r" under every vicissitude
in |)olitics, had no intention of extending their aid
to his successor. The tlimiiuition in the F^iberal
majority was, therefore. anti<i|iated, and tiiere was a
l)eriod wlien a nuich worse result than that secured
in the ballot on Wednesday wa> anticipated. For
the rest, we may i-lieerfuily leave our oi)ponents
to make what cajjilal they can out of Mk. IIoI-DKN's
diminished but still adei|uate majority.
Mr. Bali-(>ih".s s|)eech on Monday at Plymouth,
though marred by some absurtlities — c.;/., his exhi-
bition of tlie election literatiiie of AMsbeach as a
proof of the extremities to which Liberal candiilates
are driven — <leserved the careful attention of jioliti-
ciaus of every class. It conlirmed the announcement
already made of the determination of Ministers
to introduce a County (iovernnient Hill for
Ii'eland next Session, and it went some way
in defining the character of that measure.
The chief ))oint which Mit. B.^i.KofK made was
that the jiolice wotdd not be jjlaced under the con-
trol of the new County Councils. Perhai)s the most
remarkable featiu-e of his si)eech was the unconcealed
regret with which he ap])eared to contemplate the
conscciuences of the legislation on which he and his
colleagues are about to embark. Tlie new Councils,
he admitted, would drive from public life the men
who n<jw manage the local business of Ireland, the
lanillorils and other ))ersons of social rank on the
Crand .lury i)anel. This was deploi-able : but the
necessity had to Ije faced -api)ai'ently because
Ministers have at last awoke to a knowledge that
they cannot meet the country without making at
least a ])retence of an attemjit to fulfil the solemn
pledge which secured for them their victory in 1880.
Till-: manner in which the Bill has been received
by the suj)porters of the .Ministry is hardly en-
couraging. The Diihliii A'.'/)/-! .ss openly charges Mu.
B.\i.i"t)i"K with ha\ing surrendereil to the enemy:
and though tlie language of the London Conservative
newsjiapers is not tiuite so plain, there is hardly an
attemi)t to conceal the extreme disfavour with which
the Ministerial jjroject is regarded. One featiu'c of
the situation createil Ijy.AIii. B vr.roiu'si sjieech is the
irritation against the Liberal Inionists which it has
produced on the Tory side. The Conservative
follo^vers of the Covernmcnt believe that the Bill is
meant as a concession to the dissentient Liberals,
and they gird oi)enly at the j)riee they an> called
upon to i)ay for the suiijjort of their allies. It is not
very clear on what ground tlie\- take this view. Possi-
bly Ml!. CiiA.Mi!i:i;i..\i.N" and his Birmingham friends
may wish to cover their .ipn-ia-y decently by means
of a Local tiovernnient Bill ; but those Libi-rul
I'nionists who follow Loan llAHTi.\(iT<i.N", and who
are represented by such |)aiK'rs as the, TiincH and the
SiJiclalur have no more <le-ire to bring about this
change in Irelaiul than the Tories themselves have.
W'liat, for example, does .Mu. T. \\'. Hl.sski.i. think
of Mis. Bali'ulh'.-5 speech?
Thk death - blow to P.irnellism was dealt at
-Mallow last Sunday, when Mr. Dil.l.o.v and Mr.
O'BiUK.v both made sjjeeehes in which they clearly
defined their attitude towards their old leader, and
gave their reasons for refusing to follow him further.
It was easy for them to show that, ever since hia
own fall, he had been animated by the most intense
selfishness, and had been striving to secure his
jiersonal rexenge against Mr. tji,.\i).sTO.\i-: at the cost
of the interests of his country. Perhajis the most
important i)oint in the s|)eeches was .Mr. Dii.i.o.n'.s
direct ajjpeal to Mr. Par.nkm. to allow a jxirtion of
the Paris funds to be released for the l)cncfit of the
evicted tenants, to whom they rightfully Ijelong.
Both Mr. DiLi.DN and Mr. .Ir.STiN McCakthv are
l)rei)ar('il to i)ledge thi'iuselves that not a penny
of these funds shall be used for political pur-
l)oses, and they invite Mr. Parkei.i. to name
two representatives of his own side who may
c'O - ojierate in the distribution of the money
among the evicted tenants. It is hardly neces-
sary to say that Mr. Parxkt.i. has made no re-
sponse to this fair jiroposal. The money is now
locked uj) in a French bank, and if he should survive
Mr. .M( Carthv the full control of it will fall into
his own haniis. The Frcinian'n Journal, it is
evident, will shortly cease to advocate Mr. P.\rsei.l'.s
cause. His friends talk of starting a new journal,
but fear thai they cannot obtain the necessary funds.
Wk have dealt at length elsewhere with the
International Congress of Hygiene and Demography,
wliich has been held in London during the iiresent
week. Perhaps the most notable feature of the
gathering has been the manifest ign<irance of the
general public with regard to the character of the
Congress, and the class of jjersons by whom it is at-
tended. This ignorance is ai)pareutly shared by
Her Majesty's Ministers, who seem to be unaware
of the fact that London has this week been enter-
taining some of the highest authorities in foreign
countries on thosetpiestionsof international hygiene —
c.i/., the (luarantine regidations — with which Ministers
in their jiolitical character have so much to do. No
doubt it is trying for a member of the (Jovernment
to have to remain in town ovei- the lith of August in
order to jiay some marks of attention to a number of
foreign sctiititts . but the Piiixi i: or Walks was ready
to give uji his ])leasure at Cowes in onler to be present
at the ojjcning of the Congress, and it is di-creditablo
that none of Iler Majesty's Ministers showed them-
selves ready to follow his example. The reeei)tion
of our distinguished guests, though it has fallen
almost exclusively into the hands of juivate indi-
viiluals, has been of the most coniial character, and
too much pr.iise can hardly be given to the haitl-
worketi professional men who. with very limited
resources .at their command, have fulfilled the duties
which, in any other country in Kurope, would have
devolved upon a dcjiartment of the State.
182
THE SPEAKER.
[Augmst 15, 1891.
TnK death of Mit. howEU. has beeu in many
respects the most imi)ortant event of the week. The
great American had ah-eady passed the age of
seventy, but until quite recently he had retained his
youthfulness of spirit, and still seemed to have it in
him to do work for his kind. Literature loses in him
one of its most brilliant ornaments : nor is this all.
It loses also one of the most powerful representatives
of the Liberal s])irit. His death, deejjly mourned
not only in bis own country but in Great Britain,
has been made the occasion of one of those mani-
festations of the unity of our race which do
more than any i)olitical treaties can do to bind
together both branches of the Anglo-Saxon family.
It was fitting that the QrEE.v should express
her sorrow at the death of the most distinguished
representative the United States ever sent to the
English Court. It was no less fitting that the
Poet Laureate, the greatest living mau-of-lctters,
should give voice to the feeling of all English writers
at the loss of one in whose hands our noble mother-
tongue was turned to such high use. Nor have
Englishmen of all classes forgotten that Lowell was
one of the illustrious band of men who fought against
slavery in the days when that " sum of all villainy "'
was well-nigh omnipotent in America. The display
of feeling caused by his death in this country will
not, we maj^ be sure, be ungrateful to those who had
the high honour of claiming him as their fellow-
citizen.
On the 2Ist of February last the "officiating Secre-
tary to the Government of India" infoi-med Mr.
QuiNTOX that " the Governor-General in Council con-
siders that it will be desirable that the Senapatti
should be removed from Manipur and punished for
his lawless conduct," in promoting some months
previously a bloodless revolution which the Resident
reported would be, " at any rate for a time, beneficial
to the country." On Wednesday last, the Times
correspondent telegraphed, " The conviction of the
Senapatti on the chai-geof waging war and abetting
murder is also upheld. There is no ground for
clemency in his case, so he and the Tonga!
General will be executed." The man whom Sir J.
GoRST described as possessing "great abilities and
force of character, and jjopular among the jieople for
his generosity " is tlms doomed: while the story of
JIanipur is already half-forgotten. Of the evidence
])roving jiarticipation in the murder of the men with
whom, till JIr. Qi'I.vton's arrival, the SENArATTi was
on the most friendly terms, we know nothing. It
must be assumed, however, to be conclusive. Yet it
is impossible to ignore the fact that the man now
doomed to die might, but for blunders at jiresent
unexplained, be at this moment a loyal adherent to
the Government of India. If the story of .Mani])ur
had been told of the l<'rench in Tunis, or the Germans
in East Africa, the virtuous indignation of the
English press — now silent — would have known no
bounds.
It was the main thesis of Sir Henry Maine's
last work, that, as the mass of the peoi>le have no
real political opinions, democracy can only be ke])t
going at all by i)arty sjjirit and corru))tion. .Mr.
GoLDWi.N .Smith has recently insistcil that this view
holds good in Canada ; and the proceedings before
the Public Works Committee, at Ottawa, assuredly
bear him out. Whatever the exact truth about
each separate bit of bribery already sworn to,
both sides admit that Sir Hector Lancwcvin
and other ])oliticians were financed by contractors
and received subscriptions from them for election
expenses. This being granted, the alleged resiUts,
or something just like them, must follow as a matter
of course. The contractors had to get the money
from somewhere, and so it came — more or less
directly — from subsidies to railways and steamers,
or excessive profits on ]5ublic w"orks ; Avhile the
oflicials who might have proved inconvenient were
kept ciuiet with presents of money, jewellery, plate,
and, in one instance, a steam yacht. And very
much the same thing ajjjiears to have happened
among the Liberal j)arty in Quebec, to which pro-
vince most of the I'ederal scandals revealed apparently
have reference. The north-east part of it, where
the most sanguine promoter would not start a
comi)auy without a subsidy from Government,
is indeed admirably fitted by nature to be the
field of a National Policy. And, imfortnnately, the
people are equallj' fitted to base their politics —
where religion is not concerned — on Government
ai)i)ropriations alone. Sir Hector Lanoevin's tardy
resignation — demanded some weeks ago by organs of
his own party — will hardly help the Government
much, and certainly does nothing to reduce the im-
portance of Mr. Tarte's revelations.
Prices on the Stock Exchange have fallen in
almost every department during the week, and iu
some departments the decline has been serious. In
Ne%v York rumours respecting the Union Pacific
Railroad Company have circulated, and the price at
times has been as low as 33A. At the end of April
the price was about 58A, so that since that time
the fall has been nearly 40 per cent. Many specu-
lators must, of course, have suffered severely, yet
there is not expected to be as much difficulty as
at first sight might be anticipated. There is a large
floating debt, and it is feared that a receiver may
have to be appointed ; but many suspect that Mr.
Jay Gould is at the bottom of the whole movement.
Early in the year he obtained control of the com-
pany. Then it is said that he sold his shares largely,
and now it is susjiected that he has created a scare
for the purpose of buying back. However that
may be, the heavy fall in Union Pacific shares
has disorganised the whole market, and caused
a serious decline once more this week. In
the foreign department the deci-ee of the Rus-
sian (iovernment stopping the export of rye has
led to a further sharp fall, and arouses fears of
serious difficulties before long on the Berlin Bourse.
The Russian Rouble has again fallen sharply, and as
Berlin speculates largely in Rouble notes, it is feared
that the losses sustained must be growing serious.
Altogether the feeling on the Stock Exchange is by
no means comfortable. Perhajis it is less gloomy than
it was at the beginning of the week, but it is diflienlt
to see any signs of recovery as yet.
The Dii'ectors of the Bank of England made no
change on Thursday in their rate of discount. They
are evidently unwilling to do anything that might
cause a fall in the value of money, and they do
not see their way as yet to raise it. for the
receii)ts of gold from abroad still nearly e(iual
the withdrawals, and at home the demand for bank-
ing acconnnodation is exceedingly small. At the
Stock Exchange settlement this week borrowers
were able to obtain all the money they wanted at
1| per cent., and even less. Indeed, many members
of the Stock Exchange were inclined rather to pay
off than to increase their loans. In the discount
market the quotation for three months' bank bills is
still 1;'. i^er cent., but business is done even lower.
Speculation in every department in commodities as
well as in securities is utterly pai-alysed. Trade is
not so active as it has been. The harvest is late. And
though there is still some demand for gold fromabroad
it is not sullicicnt to materially affect rates. In the
silver market the jirice has fallen to i.")id. per oz.
Speculation is for the moment rendered impossible
in New \'ork by the fall iu Stock Exchange prices
generally. In Eurojje there has been unwillingness
to speculate for a considerable time jtast. The Indian
demand is small, and neither the Portuguese nor the
Sjianish daraand lias as yet proved to be so lai'ge as
a little while ago was expected. The tendency, there-
fore, is for the time being downward rather than
upward.
August 15, 1891.]
THE Sl'EAKER.
183
.M
MK. BALFOUR'S MANIFESTO.
K. BALFOUR deserves credit fur the vi<roiir
-L^l. with which at tlie close of ii loii^ I'iirlia-
mentary Session he has opened the jiolitica! canipaii^n
of tlie recess. Jlis speech at I'lyniouth was tiothin;,'
less than a polititMl manifesto of (irst-rate i.njjoi-t-
anee, and the only wonder is that it should have
been made in the first week of the holidays rather
than on the eve of the General Election. The
explicit declaration that a Count}' Oovernment Bill
for Ireland will be introduced next Session was
accompanied by a defence of that measure, and a
sugfj^estion of its character, which are at least un-
usual when a Bill lies many months ahead of
us. But the Irish Secretary clearly felt that
some apoIo<ry and explanation had become ab-
solutely necessary. Why are Ministers going to
legislate at all for Ireland :J is the question
■which is being asked by their own supporters ;
and it is impossible to doubt that with the majority
of Conservatives this new departure of theirs is
regarded with the strongest suspicion and dislike.
" It is to fultil a promise and satisfy the Liberal
Unionists," cry the Tory critics ; and thei-eiipon we
see them calcidating with ruefid faces the precise
cost to the party of this Liberal Unionist Alliance.
We are by no means so sure that the Liberal
Unionists, as a whole, are at all more anxious than
the Tories themselves to see local government
established in Ireland. The Spectator, at all events,
would fain have none of it. But the heads of the
party probably recognise the fact that they could not
face the country at the (ieneral Election unless they
were to make some attempt to fultil tiie pledge by
means of which the\' secured their majority in IHSCk
It is not because Mr. Balfour and his colleagues like
Irish Local Government any better than the dull
rank and file of their followers do, but because they
know that to dissolve without jiretending, at all
events, to put a scheme of this sort before Parliament,
would be to admit their own bad faith and to bring
disaster upon themselves, that they are embarking
on their present course of action. There is, indeed,
a cynical audacity in their tone towards the uieasure
they are about to bring forward, which speaks volumes
for the demoralisation that has fallen upon them.
With hardly any pretence at concealment, Mr. Bal-
four is legislating in the teeth of his own convictions
and of the convictions of his party, in the hope that
he may thereby recover the lost favour of the public.
Ifc is the case of Free Education over again, and we
confess that we do not envy those who are called
upon for these repeated sacrifices of principle to ex-
pediency.
The red - hot opi)onents of Home Rule can
hardly have liked Mr. Balfour's reference to his
own measure. lie frankly expresses his belief that
the establishment of Coinity L'ouncils in Ireland will
mean the withdrawal of the control of local aft'airs
from the land-owners, in whom it is now vested, and
its transfer to the occupiers. In other words, these
County Councils, everywhere outside of Ulster, will
be in the hands of the men who now send Home Rule
representatives to Parliament, and who, in Town
Councils and Boards of Guardians, are in a chronic
state of conflict with Dublin Castle and the police.
This may seem to people who really believe in the
principle of popular control a necessary condition of
affairs; but it cannot seem otherwise than hateful to
the classes which have hitherto followed Mr. Balfour
with unswerving loyalty. To the Irish landlords
and loyalists, it must seem just as much a sur-
render of the fortress as the frank acceptance of
Home Rule itself would be. This, indeed, appears
to be the view already taken by so strong a supporter
of the Irish Secretary as the Dublin Ejrprexii. Mr.
Balfour, it is true, has his remedy for the evil which
he admits he is about to create. The County Coun-
cils will have control of the rates, and of all the
matters btdonging to local government with one
exception. Tiiey will he allowed no contnd of the
police. We should like to know how long the Irish
Secretary expects this restriction to last. It is
hardly necessary to say that this clause is intro-
duced into the scheme for the simple purpose of
showing that (from the Coercionist point of view)
the present Cabinet is not quite so bad as Mr. Glad-
stone and his colleagues wouM be. Looking at the
matter from another standpoint, it seems to us that
the Tory jiroposal is very much worse than any
which Mr. Gladstone would be likely to make. To
create tliese County Councils, and then to withhold
from them the control of a great executive bodv,
such as the police force in Ireland, is surely a colossal
blunder. It would mean not merely a renewal and
continuan-^e, but a serious aggravation of the
struggle between the people and the authorities.
We have already seen Boards of Guardians dis-
solved, mayors of towns arrested as law-breakers,
visiting magistrates insulted, defied, or ignored by
the police and theii- superiors ; and the spectacle
has been sufficiently startling and disgraceful.
In future, if Mr. Balfour's scheme were to be
adopted, we might expect to see these County
Councils similarly at war with the constabulary ;
and the legally oi-ganised representative body of a
district defied with impunity by men of the stamp of
the police officials who figured at the last trial of
^Ir. Dillon and Jlr. O'Brien. Does any sensible
supporter of the Ministry think that this state of
things will be an improvement upon the present?
We confess we do not wonder at the ill-suppressed
apprehensions and indignation with which Mr.
Balfour's most faithful friends have received the
announcement of his latest scheme.
The Plymouth speech contained the usual declara-
tion which is now the truism of Tory platforms, that
Home Rule has had nothing to do with the winning
of recent elections. It is a pity that a man of in-
telligence like Mr. Balfour should think it worth his
while to repeat this silly tale. It cainiot be of im-
portance to him to convince his own friends of this
assertion, and he will never be able to convince his
opponents. The Liberal party knows that it is not
only winning by-elections steadily, but that it is
winning them upon Home Rule. It was the Home
Kide cause that triumphed at Walsall on Wednes-
da)'. That cause, strong as it was a week ago,
has received new strength from the speeches of
Mr. Dillon and :\rr. O'Brien at Mallow. It is
no longer possible to doubt that between the
accredited representatives of the Irish people, and
the Liberals of Great Britain, the union which
was formed five years ago is now stronger than
it ever was before. Mr. Pamell's great treason
has been exposed and baffled by his own most trusted
lieutenants, and it is mei'ely as the tool of Mr.
Balfoiir and the avowed enemy of the Irish national
movement that he now lingers upon the scene. In
these circumstance-; it is hardly wise of the Chief
Secretary to echo the foolish fallacies about Liberal
weariness of Home Rule. If the Liberal party were
really weary of the cause to which they stand com-
mitted, we might at least be sure of oni' thing, and
that is that Mr. B.ilfour himself woidd be the first
to abandon his proposal to give Ireland a system of
local self-government. It is because he dreads a
genuine system of Home Rule that he is now about
to try his hind at the production of a sham measure
of the same class. What its fate will be is already
manifest. The Irish Secretary himself can hardly
184
THE SPEAKER.
[August 15, 1891.
venture to hope that he can earn his new 2)hin by
means of Tory votes. But if he should shrink from
carrj'intT a measure of this kind in the teeth of the
opposition of his own friends in Ireland, there can
be little doubt as to the course he will take. The
appeal to the country will be made on the strength
of bis scheme for local government. The electors
will be asked to choose between his Bill and Home
Rule. We could hardly wish for a more satisfactory
issue than this, uor can the result of the appeal to
the judgment of the nation be doubtful.
THE NEW HUMANITAEIAXISM.
WE print on another page an account, from the
pen of one of its leading members, of that
great Congress which — somewhat to the bewilder-
ment of the ordinary citizen — has been held in
London during the present week. There is ample
room, however, for a survey of its proceedings from
an independent standpoint. To us it seems that the
Congress of Hygiene is not so much a forum of de-
bate ; it is a sort of commemoration, the commemora-
tion of a series of unsurpassed victories — Waterloos,
veritable Borodinos and Marengos, in which millions
of lives have been saved ; victories so inspiring and
encouraging that there is no saying what may be
done in a few years. Meditate ujwn the facts told
by Sir Joseph Fayrer in his address upon preventive
medicine. In the England of liStiO-"'.' — with one-
tifteenth part of it lakes, stagnant water, and moist
places, the chill damp of marsh fever everywhere,
houses of mud or wood, small, dirty, ill-venti-
lated, the floors covered with foul-smelling rushes
or sti'aw, the streets unpaved and with open
gutters, the food scanty (little varied, with few
vegetables and much salted meat), small-pox, marsh
fever, scurvy, and lejirosv prevalent — the death rate
was 80 per 1,000; bv 1081-90 it had fallen to 42-1
per 1,000; in 1880 it had sunk to 17-85 per 1,000.
These ai-e the true victories of humanity. But much
remains to be won, as may be seen by compar-
ing the death rate in London with, say, those in
Bolton or some other Lancashire towns. Sir Joseph
Fayrer calculates that preventible diseases still
kill in England yearly about 125,000 i)ersons, and
he cites a calculation as to cases of illness not ending
fatally, that 78| millions of days of labour, or in
money .17,750,000, are annually lost by reason of
preventible diseases. One-fourth of the present
deaths take place, it is estimated by some experts,
from such causes, and it is pretty clear that
the preventible diseases are being prevented. Dr.
Priestley, in his striking paper on JIaternitj' Hos-
pitals, brings out the fact that, while the mortality
in such places iiuder the old ir'giiw before the
introduction of antiseptics was o-i-21 per 1,001),
it is now less than 5 per per 1,000. Well may
all concerned be proud of such a triumph. No
doubt there are disconcerting mysteries which
so far have baffled investigators. A new sewage
system is created in Salisbury : immediately follows
an "extraordinary" reduction in the death rate.
The old insanitary cesspool system in a Surrey
village, to which Dr. Seaton refers, is replaced by a
new and elaborate system : there results an epi-
demic of diphtheria. The discussion in the bac-
teriology section leaves the impression that Koch,
Pasteur, Dr. Roux, and Dr. IMetschinkoft' are but on
the threshold of the subject in which they are the
chief worker-s. Whether Dr. Metschinkolf is right
in his striking theory that there is a strugirle
a out ranee l>etween the cells of the bodv and the
invading micro-organisms, the white blood cor-
l^uscles seeking to devour the germs of disease, and
vice vertiii, is uncertain ; the ways of those enemies
of the race that work in darkness are obscure. But
even with present knowledge, what an outlook !
For the first time we are within measurable dis-
tance of a time when, practically speaking, all mem-
bers of the community will live their full natural
lives — will die only because the machine is outworn.
Hitherto a large number have made shipwreck just
when going out of port, many more sank when not
half-wa)' across ; and now we are told that every-
body ma}' make the whole voyage. If the average
mortality of London in the latter half of the seven-
teenth century was 80 per 1,000, and in 1889, 17'4,
what may it not be in 1990 ? In that larger science
of political econoni}', health is no less a factor than
wealth. If the smaller science of jjolitical economy
has been stationary, the more comprehensive has
been advancing, and we look forward to soon seeing
National Health Budgets which will enumerate
the effectives and non-effectives of society, state the
expenditure by reason of death and sickness, and the
income in increaseil health, and so accurately com-
pute the true national surplus.
In both branches of the work of the Congress, in
demography as well as hygiene, there is an advance,
and in both is a tendency is push out the dabbler
and the talker and writer on things in general.
Science is fast invading fields which had been left
open to the sciolist. Take, for example, the subject
of the future growth of nations. Here, until latelj-,
patriotism or chauvinism was rampant. It said what
it liked, certain that it could not be refuted. Through
French literature ran a secret assumption that it was
in the order of things that the French language and
civilisation must extend more and more as the survival
of the fittest. All this is changed, not so much bv
reason of Gravelotte and Sedan as of the inexorable
facts which demogi-aphers have made known ; the
spirit of vaunting optimism has given place to one ap-
proaching despair. The same assumption may now be
detected in English literature ; it is taken for ^ranted
that the Anglo-Saxon must eventually be universal.
We, too, ought not to be over-confident : the results
of the last censuses of England and the United States
may well inspire doubts ; and the whole subject of
population is taking a new asjject. Further investi-
gations in this field pointing to new theories are pro-
ceeding; what they are Mr. Francis Galton indicated
in his address. "The whole question of fertility under
the various conditions of civilised life requires more
detailed research than it has yet received. We re-
quire further investigations into the truth of the
hypothesis of Malthus, that there is really no limit
to over-population besides that which is afforded by
misery or prudential restraint. Mr. Galton throws
out some hints as to the true clue to the fertility of
different nations and classes ; and he proposes re-
search, in his favourite fashion, into the hereditary
permanence of several classes, taking specimens of
the least and most efficient physically, morally, and
intellectually. ^Vhcther the true law of j^opulation
will be found in that way, we have our doubts:
jjarticular societies have, like other organisms, their
special law of fertility ; in what is vaguely called
race may lurk, as he admits, a part of the solu-
tion of that problem. Crime might be cited as
another examj^le that the day of the talker on things
in general is nearl}' over. Formerly it was always
safe to say that education must put down crime ; that
if only we had schools enough, gaols might be shut
up. Everybody accjuainted with the subject knows
nowadays that this is most doubtful : statistical
science attests a steady spread of education and a
steady increase of certain forms of crime, and those
Auo-ust IT), 1891.]
THE SPKAKi:iJ.
185
not the least repulsive. Much was e.xpected ci
Couffi'ess now sittinfj. We ciinnot sav more in its
favour than that it has realised what was expected —
that we liave liad ij^reat thenii's worthily discussed,
and an \inusualiy small amount of social science
chatter.
^'FUlMUsr
AGODl) many Englishmen will, we imagine, read
the judgment of .Mr. Justice .Stirling in the
Ailesbury case with a keen sense that their country-
is still a kind of Laputa. We have nothing to say
against the technical correctness of the judge's
tiuding. It appears to be quite in harmony with the
law. The Court of Chancery was asked to act as
referee between disputing trustees of the property
of which the Marquis of Ailesbury is the tenant
for life, with a goodly number of remainder-men
attached to him. Lord Ailesbury wished to sell a
hopelessly encumbered estate to Lord Iveagh, late
Sir Edward Guinness, for the sum of .t7.JU,U(.H». One
trustee and all the remainder-men opposeil the sale.
Mr. Justice Stirling's judgment was dii'eeted to the
one sentimental ]>oint as to whrther he was justified
in letting the wide and beautiful dcmiain of Savernake
Forest go out of the hands of the Ailesbury family
with a spendthrift and bankrupt tenant, but with an
available reserve of fairly thrifty and well-to-do suc-
cessors. He decided that he would not disappoint
these persons of their hope of owning one of the
great show places of Kugland, and of maintaining
the traditions of a family of no gi"eat repute in
the public service. In other words, Mr. Justice
Stirling decided to retain under the care of a hope-
less prodigal of twenty-eight, who lives on the
grace of a money-lender, an estate which does not
yield more than a very few hundreds of net income,
which has been let down till it must be in parts
almost below the margin of cultivation, and which, on
the other hand, had the promise in Lord Iveagh — a
type of the better kind of noiii-i'HH ricl(c—oi an owner
of abundant resources and great business capacity.
The farmers of Savernake will have to go without
their improvements, and the estate will be allowed
to slip more and more into " loop'd and window'd "
rauiredness, so loufr as mv Lord Ailesburv, who
may have forty years of highly useful life be-
fore him, " is to this body.'' And all because
Savernake " ought," in the opinion of Mr. Justice
Stirling, to belong to the Ailesburys. '• Ought " is
good. It is so modern. It exhibits our landed system
in all its palpitating actuality. It is so like an
English judge to parade a solemn array of precedents
in order to prove the •' right " of a family of English
Brahmins with the appropriate motto '• Finmns,'' and
with a craving to recover a lost position in their caste,
to go on ordering the lives of so many thousand
yeomen and plouglmien. and to lay and keep waste so
many tens of thousands of acres of a country that
year by year loses a little more of its power to main-
tain its rural population.
The human side of thi> tr.igi-comedy of land-
lordism is not a little curious. The Marquis of Ailes-
bury is a young gentleman who has had tive years'
enjoyment of his title. His family practically dates
from a cinny Bruce, who got tlie right side of King
James the First's •■lugge" (we l>elieve that is the cor-
rect historic expression), ami made haste to change
the Royal favour into lanils stolen from the Cis-
tercians in Yorkshire and an earldom of Elgin.
Later, they married into the family of the Seymours,
from which sprang the Protector Somerset, one of
the ablest and most rapacious of the nobles
to whom the Reformation came as a boon and a
i'lessing totally une.Mun'cted with tiieology. From
this union cann- the Savernake Estates, which
the Somersets origiuiiUy acipiin-d by nrarriage
and (nily remotely bv rapine. The Ailesburys,
first earls and tiien iii;irqni«es, havi- as a rule care-
fully abstained from lining anything which might
entitle them to publii' gratitu<le. They jobbed tiieir
two boroughs of .Marlbonnigh and (ireat liedwin,
which once returned four members, so discreetly as
to earn the gratitude of George the Fourth and
to obtain their step up in the Peerage. Up to
188r> they returned, with the trilling assistance
of some few hundred electors, a member for
Marlborough. They have the patronage of nine
livings, which is of course dispensed by the young
gentleman whom the Jockey Club lately warned ojf
Xewmarket Heath, and who is described by his friends
as a whip of quite fantastic merit. Lord Ailesbury
has since and before his accession •' done himself
proud." He has absorbed the little matter of the
Cistercian abbe^', which counted for a good tlT-i.odi) ;
he has placed himself on the books of Mr. Samuel
(not Mr. George) Lewis to the extent of over
t2()0,00O; he has had a brief and not glorious
cai'eer on the turf ; he is said to have sported or
even invented, after the manner of the First Gentle-
man of Europe, a new coachman's Ijutton. His
position as regards the i'O odd farms and the 40,niMi
acres of Savernake is curious. Personally, he would
not be a penny the better for the sale. He would
have to raise .t2oO,(iOO to pay his debts, and the
interest on tliis sum, together with the jointures
and the outgoings of the estate, would reduce his
income from Lord Iveagh's t7">n,(tiin to its pre-
sent figure of a very few hundreds. It is not sur-
prising that he feels the burden of his position,
and would like to be rid of it. Probably if the
three kinjrdoms could be searched through and
through (not excluding Whitechapel), the)' would
not be found to contain a man more unsuited to
exercise any sway over the lives and fortunes of
others, more unfit to inherit anything Init a pair
of hands and the necessity to work for his living.
But our excellent law not only condemns him to his
heritage of woe, but sternly waves him back from
his well-meant attempts to let in a better man.
Savernake, therefore, remains with the Ailesburys, on
the chance that some future marquis njay be rich
enousfh to administer it with credit.
There is, no doubt, a certaui picturesqueness in
a decision which permits Lord Ailesbury to legislate
for us, to appoint (possibly under the advice of Mr.
Samuel Lewis) to the cure of souls, and to pass over
to others, though not to Mr. Lewis, the unearned
increment of Savernake. The law allows it, the
Court decrees it, and, we suppose, we ought to see
nothing wrong in it. W'.iat, however, does strike
us with some seriousness is not the refusal of the
Court to sanction the sale, which, at the best would
have exchanged a feudal lord of the better type for
one of the worse. It is the appalling levity of a law
which, in the mouth of a very able ju Igc, cimsiders
a problem of wide human happiness solely with respect
to what is socially " due " to an oldish, but in no
wa}- a distinguished family of landlords. whi.i have
fallen on evil days, but who have nothing but their
own reckless improvidence to blame for them.
Reading the Ailesbury case it seems difficult to
realise that we are in post-Revolution d.iys, or that
we have advanced very appreciably beyond the ethics
of the seiiTniorial court. The Ailesbury fa:nily, with
a certain anticipatory grace, have thought it wise
to inscribe " Fuimus " on their co.it-of-arm-. Surely
it was not too much to ask Mr. Justice Stirling to
take the lead thus opportunely tendered him, and to
wTite " Fuerunt "' instead.
186
THE SPEAKER.
[August 15, 1891.
THE EGYPTIAN QUESTION AGAIN.
ri^HE reflex of the excitement caused on the Conti-
I nent b}' the supposed attitude of England
towards the Triijlc Alliance has made itself felt
in an unpleasant way in our diplomatic relations
with the Porte. A fortnight ago we mentioned
the rumour that the Sultan — no doubt under dijjlo-
matic instigation — was anxious to reopen the nego-
tiations as to the date of the withdrawal from
Egypt of the British Army of occupation. Last
week the Staiidanl announced that the negotiations
had been opened, but were to be postponed until
after Lord Salisbury's return from the Continent.
This week the same paper has stated — evidently under
official inspiration — that it is with extreme impatience
that the Sultan submits to the jtostjionement.
Turkish officials are strangers to energetic action,
and consequently can easily dispense with a holiday,
so that in one sense the Sultan's impatience is
intelligible. It presents, indeed, a somewhat curious
contrast with the slackness and the repeated delays
on the part of the Porte, which brought Sir Henry
Wolff's mission in 1887 to an abrupt conclusion. Then
we laid down certain conditions determining our
administration of Egypt, and pi'omised that the
acceptance of them by all the EurojJean Powers
should be followed by our withdrawal. The Powers
liesitated, and the Sultan hesitated, and Sir Henry
Wolff, very properly, did not wait for them. As to
the influences which }\ave now stimulated the Sultan
to act, there is no room for doubt.
Now it is quite within the bounds of possibility
— looking at the way the Porte usually conducts its
business — that the negotiations may not be left to
the present Government to comj)lete. By the end of
next year, at latest, we shall have a new Foreign
Secretary, and as to the remoter future of our policy
in Egypt, the Liberal party, whom he will represent,
has always been divided in opinion. A certain
section — of less relative imjiortance than formerly,
but still very influential among the electorate —
would gladly withdraw as soon as possible not only
from Egypt, but from all foreign entanglements
whatever. Another section would undoubtedly adopt
an ideal which is economically impossible, unless,
like the democracies of antiquity, we made our subject
allies pay tribute — democracy at home combined with
Empire abroad. Both ideals are outside the sphere
of practical politics. With regard to the immediate
future, no conceivable Government, Conservative or
Liberal, can have any policj' save one — which is
marked out for us by circumstances beyond our own
control.
In the present si.ate of Europe, and in view of the
progress of the scramble for Africa, we cannot allow
the greatest prize in the latter country to be left a
prey to certain misgoverninent and disorder. The
inevitable and speedy result of our withdrawal would
be the intervention either of ourselves or of some other
Mediterranean Power. Even to fix a date for that
withdrawal would stimulate other Powers to prepare
for intervention. France must protect Algiers and
Tunis, Italy her possessions — such as they are — in
Abyssinia. The mere jn-obability of such an occasion
would intensify all those international jealousies which
are constantly breaking out in connection even witli
such trivial ma'tei's as the sympathies of Ras Aloula
or the religious orders in Tunis — and which even
Signer Crispi, desinte his fatuous efforts to em-
phasise them, declares he wishes to suppress. There
is plenty of explosive material in Crete and Macedonia,
in Servia and Albania, which may bring about a
European war, whether tlie Triple Alliance chooses
or not, witliout adding to it the indefinitely greater
quantity which our evacuation of Egypt, under
any circumstances within the sphere of prob-
ability, would necessarily leave absolutely uncon-
trolled. As to the suzerainty of the Porte, from
the Liberal point of view especially, there will
be even less doubt about our answer. The Power
which habitually fails throughout its own dominions
in the elementary duties of a civilised Government —
which cannot repress revolt in Yemen or keep oi"der
in Crete or Armenia, or stop bi-igandage in the
neighbourhood of its own capital, or, indeed,
pay or clothe its own troops — cannot be given
any fresh oj)portunities for failure in that part
of the world where failure would be most disastrous.
Our own work — so well described by Mr. Alfred
Milner in the Pall Mall Gazette some weeks ago —
will not be finished for years. Till it is finished,
every year gives fresh justification for our jjresence
during the next ; and until the danger of a
Mohammedan revival is past— a danger which the
partition of Africa is extremely likely to intensify
— our modest army of occupation cannot be with-
drawn. In the interest both of Egypt and of Euro-
pean peace, we must at pi-esent stay where we are.
By our work in Egypt we are justified ; and we are
justified still more by the certaint}- that our presence
there nullifies one set of causes of a European ex-
plosion.
THE NAYAL MANCEUVRES.
THE general interest aroused by the annual
Naval Manoeuvres is a hopeful sign. It is well
that the public should endeavour to master the
lessons they teach ; but it is important that these
lessons should be rightly understood. Unfortunately
in all such object lessons there lies danger. The
correspondents to whom the public must look for
teaching are frequently at fault. Their letters,
often hurriedly written, may convey only the
impressions of the moment ; the broad aspects
of the operations as a whole may altogether
escape them. The popular impression created by
last year's manoeuvres was doubtless unfavourable.
No powder was burned between the main fleets, and
the C squadron disappointed expectation by going
off into space, and striking the prescribed trade
route at a point where it was one hundred and eighty
miles vride, and no concentration of traffic existed.
Yet these manoeuvres were extremely instructive.
Sir G. Tryon showed how a fleet might be handled
for the effective protection of the most important
'• neck of commerce " of the Empire. A new insight
into the possibilities of torpeolo-boat employment
was gained, auol the young officers who conducted
the attack on the fleet in Plymouth Sound clearly
indicated the only way in which such an attack
coulol hope to be successful.
Again this year the mameuvres have ended
amidst a chorus of dissatisfaction, by no means
justified, and arising prinripally from a want of
comprehension of the objects in view. It is not yet
sufficiently realised that instruction is best conveyed
by explaining clearly to the officers and men con-
cerned the nature and objects of all maud^uvres.
Mystery seems to jjossess some inexjjlicable fascina-
tion, and the i-esult is that teaching sutt'ers. The
want of grasp of the objects in view is reflected
from the officers to the press, and from the pi'ess to
the general public. The manoeuvres of 1890 were
mainly strategic ; those of 1891 almost purely
tactical. The wide striking range which the
torpedo-boat was shown in the former year to
possess, naturally suggested experiments in new
methods of dealing with this nature of attack.
Formerly it had been customary to protect the battle-
August 15, 1891.]
THE SPEAK KK.
1K7
ship froin attack ai m-.i ii\ i|uick-lii hil; j,'"'^ .mil
searcli-li<,'lits; atauchor.hynettiiij,'. A totally ilirtereiit
policy is possible, however. In place of awaitini; its
attack, the torpedo-boat luav l)c huiiteil down by
special vessels possessing' '^vt ater speed and tar
greater coal endurance, able in keep the sea in ail
"weathers, and armed with nnnierous guns of the
class which the torpedo-boat has most reason to
dread. In order to bring this new policy to a test,
Ireland was assnmed to lie the country of an enemy
who had established ahmg his coast six torpedo-boat
stations, with a view to attack Hritish commerce in
transit through St. George's Channel. The torpedo-
boat must have a jiicd a terre to enable it to refit, and
to secure rest and reliefs to its overworked crew.
The six torpedo-stations were thus represented by
depot-ships anchored in solci-ted Irish ports ; and
from them the - Blue Squadron " of twentj' torpedo-
boats, under llear-Adminil Krskine, might operate
at will. The " lied Squadron," under Captain Long,
consisted of three old-type armour-cladj provided with
nets — a skeleton fleet of battle-ships — and accom-
panied by six " torpedo-catchers." According to the
rules of the game, it Avas open to Captain Long to cap-
ture any of the enemy's depots, or to cajiture or put out
of action the opposing torpedo-boats, on fulfilment of
certain conditions. The various engagements have
been sufficiently described. Captain Long appears
to have handled his vessels with great vigour, and
the umpires admit his claims to the capture of two
stations and four torpedo-boats; while seventeen
boats in addition are regarded as having been put
out of action for twenty-four hours. Under the
rules, therefore, there is no doubt that the new
offensive policy proved disastrous to the torpedo-
boats, and their many zealous advocates will doubt-
less jirotest against conditions which have previously
been accepted. It is not for a moment to be sup-
posed that the arbitrary conditions of the game cor-
responded with those of war ; but the recent torped< >-
boat actions in Chilian waters go far to show that
they are approximately fair.
The great principle of strategy which von
Moltkc upheld was to adopt a vigorous offensive.
The Xaval Manrcuvres of Lsi'l appear to prove that,
as against torpedo-boats, this principle is equally
sound. It follows that to a great naval Power pos-
sessing a vast commerce which must be defended in
wai-, torpedo-catchers, vigorously handled, supply the
surest guarantee of security. The torpedo-boat is,
in the main, the weapon of the Power whose policy
is the attack of commerce, and for Great Britain
its uses are restricted. To have thrown new light
upon a question so important, and to have, perhaps,
supplied a check to the tendency to the over-pro-
duction of torpedo-boats, is no small result. Our
task is to study and grasp our peculiar and indi-
Tidual requirenuMits, avoiding all temptations to copy
measures which may be adapted to the widely
different needs of other Powers.
Of the proceedings of tlie Northern and Western
Fleets, there is little to be saitl. Eight first-class battle-
ships and tw-elve other vessels — the most powerful
squadron ever assembled — were placed under the com-
mand of Sir M. Culme Seymour for evidutionary
purposes in the North S>'a. and nineteen vessels,
including eight battle-ships, under Rear-Admiral
Fitzroy, assembled at Ben haven. It is to l>e re-
gretted that the {U'ogranunc arranged for the former
fleet was cut short by orders from the Admiralty, and
that bej'ond the ordinary mameuvres of the signal-
book nothing was attempted, so that no fresh light has
been thrown on the much-vexed question of fighting
formations. But the admirable way in which the
mobilised shijis — huge complex machines as they
are, with crews hastily brought together — fell
into their place in line, n-ii>its miiniti' creilit on
the jjirniiiLHrl of J1..M. Navy, and is full of good
augury.
Tiif (ii-riuuns liavi- proved to tii'- world the value
of niano'Livres. To (;reat Britain the Navy is as th>-
Army to < lermany, and something mcjri'. It is only
by exercises skilfully planned and intelligently
executed that tin- temper of tin- '•tremendous
weapon " on which the existence of the Empire
depends can be preserved.
MK. LIDDEKDALE ON THE SITUATION.
THE Xrir York III r<d(l has published a very in-
teresting account of an intervii-w one of its
representatives has hail with the (Governor of the
Bank of England. For a considerable time past
fears have existed in New York, as well as upon the
Continent, that the Citj' of London had practically
become bankrupt, and that scarcely a Iciuling house
is in a thoroughly solvent position. Hence credit had
received a shock all over the world, and men were
afraid to enter into new engagenn-nts, not so much
because they apprehended difficulties at home, but
because they were doubtful what might happen at
any moment in London. It is not surprising then
that the representative of an enterprising journal
which publishes issues, not only in New York,
but in London and Paris, should try to ascertain
what the real facts are, or that the Governor
of the Bank of England should be willing
to allaj', as far as he properly could, the alarm
which exists. Briefly, then, his statement is,
that with a single exception, all the important
houses in the City are solvent. One house has been
known to be in difficulties for at least twelve months.
Its name has again and again been the subject of
talk not only at home I)ut abroad, and it has on one
or two occasions already received assistance. Appa-
rently it is once more embarrassed, but its embarrass-
ments are being considered, and it would seem, from
what the Governor of the Bank said, that they are
likely to be once nujre arranged. \Vhatever the
outcome of the negotiations may be, it seems to be
the opinion of Mr. Lidderdale, as undoul)tedIy it is
that of the City generally, that very little influence
will now be exercised upon the course of affairs. The
credit of the house has been too much under discus-
sion. For the past year it has therefo:-e been com-
pelled to restrict its business in all directions, and
even if it were now to decide upon wiiuling-up. the
impression made upon the general public would be
sli"-ht. At one time the closing of the doors of so
threat an establishment would unquestionably have
produced a crisis, but the public has now become
accustimied to the notion that the difficulties are
insuperable, and therefore little trouble would prob-
ablv follow even if it had to suspend. The Governor
of the Bank of England assured his interviewer
that with this exception no important house is now
in serious difficulties. He admitted that it was ex-
tremelv likely that failures would ensue. After such
a crisis as we have been passing through, with a
breakdown in South America, and a probable break-
down in Southern Europe, it would be very strange
if there were none But these will be unimjiort-
ant so far as the Money Market is c(.>ncerned,
and therefore will not have serious consequences.
South America is not able to buy on the scale it
had been doing for years past, and it would there-
fore not surprise anyone if there were to be failures
amoui.: commercial houses in the South American
trade. Similarlv there would be no cause for wonder
if there were failiu-es amongst houses engaged in
188
THE SPEAKER.
[August 15, 1891.
trade with the United States — whic-h has been dis-
ort^anised, as everybody knows, by the McKinley
tariff — and in other directions : but these will be a con-
sequence of events that have already happened, and
most people ai-e now so well prepai-ed for them that
they will not have much effect upon puljlic opinion.
Assuming that the Governor of the Bank of England
is right — and undoubtedly he expresses the opinion
of the most competent judges in the City — the crisis
is now drawing gradually to a close. The Bank of
England and the Joint Stock Banks have been
steadily increasing their reserves for eight or nine
months, and are now unus'iallv strong. All classes
have been at the same time restricting their risks in
every possible way. Therefoi-e the liabilities of the
country have been gTOwing smaller and smaller
month by month, and its means of meeting them
have been increasing. We may hope, therefore, that
before long a more confident and hopeful spirit will
arise.
Any very great revival, however, is not to be
anticipated while Southern Europe and Russia
remain in their present state. The ukase issued by
the Russian Government forbidding the export of
rye leaves no longer a doubt that the Russian
harvest is a failure, that much distress, if not actual
famine, is to be ajjprehended in extensive districts,
and that, therefore, there may be grave political as
well as financial troubles before the Empire. In that
case there can hardly fail to be a considerable
fall in all Russian securities, which, as our readers
know, the French investing public have been buy-
ing upon an enormous scale during the past few
years. It is roughlj- estimated that the French
holdings of Russian Government bonds at present
are over seventy and eighty millions sterling. If
there were to be a serious fall in those securities
and a great depreciation in Russian credit, not
only would French investors suffer, but the great
French banks that have been active in converting
Russian bonds would have an additional lock-up
of their capital. Their credit would be affected,
and 2)eople would begin to ask anxiously whether
they could tide over so many difficulties — a fall
in Russian secui'ities, following so rapidly upon
the great depreciation in South American securities
and Southern European securities, which themselves
followed so rapidly upon the copper crash and the
■Panama Canal collapse. Hardly less serious is the
Russian harvest failure as it affects Germany. The
poorer classes in Germany live mainly upon rye,
and they draw their supplies chiefly from Russia.
The Russian exports being stopped, naturall}'
the price of rye rose sharply. Indeed, rye is
now actually dearer than wheat in the German
market. And it is to be recollected that the German
harvest itself is bad, so that the_ stoppage of the
Russian supply is all the more serious. Already
trade has been declining in Germany ; industrial
securities of all kinds have been falling disastrously ;
and people have been looking forward to the
autumn with grave apprehension. Now it would
seem that Germany will have to turn to the United
States for its food supply ujion an unusual scale, and
as she cannot export goods thither sutiicient in
quantity to j)ay for her imports of food, she will have
to send gold to make the payment. The German
money market is likely thereby to be seriously af-
fected by-and-by. and if so, there may be trouble
on the German Bourse. Add to all this that the
bankruptcy of Portugal is only a question of time,
that the crisis in Italy is growing more and more
acute, and that the financial difficulties of Spain are
vorj' serious. When we consider all this, and bear in
mind how deeply both Paris and Berhn are involved
in the finances not of Russia only, but of Portugal,
Spain, and Italy as well, we can see that trouble
upon the Paris and Berlin Bourses is only too likely
in the autumn, and with that prospect no very great
recovery on the London Stock Exchange can be
looked for.
It is possible of course that the difficulties upon
the Continent may be counterbalanced by a great
revival of business' in the United States. That is the
main hope of the City, and to a certain extent it
appears to be well founded. The crops all over the
United States are exceptionally good; the wheat
harvest particularly is one of the finest that has
ever been gathered in. The maize harvest promises
to be exceptionally good, and the cotton is also
looking well : but as the harvest in Russia is a
failure, and as the crops all over Western Europe are
deficient, the demand for wheat for Western Europe
will be exceptionally large this year, and will have to
be supplied almost entirely by the United States.
Thus the American farmers will be able to sell all
their surplus farm produce at profitable jirices as
quickly as they please, and consequently that
they will do better this year than they have
done for many years past. It seems also reason-
able to conclude that the railways will be able
to do an exceptionally prosperous business. It
seems also to follow that there must also be a
larger demand than for a long time past for Euro-
pean goods of every kind, and so, in spite of the
McKinley tariff; there may be a better trade with
Europe than there has been for a long time.
Furthermore, the general expectation is that,
when all classes are doing well, speculation in
American railroad securities will spring up in New
York, that prices will consequently rise, and that,
with the recovery in American securities, European
holders will, to a certain extent at all events, be re-
couped for their losses in South America and Southern
Europe. The argument is undoubtedly plausible,
and, we should say, would be likely to be fulfilled
were it not for the fear of what may happen upon
the Continent. If confidence revives here, if every-
body begins to recognise soon that the opinion of
the Governor of the Bank is sound, that no serious
failures are to be apprehended — and if, at the same
time, there are no political troubles either in Portugal
or in Russia, and no great convulsion upon the Paris
or Berlin Bourses — it is quite possible that we may
see a revival in speculation in the American depart-
ment before the year is out. But, on the other hand,
the fear of what may happen upon the Continent is
likely to deter all prudent people from engaging
rashly in new risks.
niROXICLE OP FOREIGN AFFAIRS.
rpi IIS week the comparative lull in international
X. alTairs is not counterbalanced by any revival
of activity in the internal politics of any of the Con-
tinental nations. The French fleet has at last left
Cronstadt--after a recei)tion of the most enthusiastic
kind had been given to Admiral Oervais and the
lirincipal otliccrs at Moscow — and. after coaling at
Christiansand, will arrive at Portsmontli on Thursday
next. Some of the loading French newsjiaiJers — the
Tonpa and the Di'lxtts in i)articular — ha\e taken a
more sober tone about the i)rcseut enthusiasm in
France for Russia, and pointed otit the extremely
slender bases on which a i)ermanent friendship
between the two jjcoples must rest. But the popular
enthusiasm continues unabated. Everywhere the
Russian National Anthem is received with frantic
ai)plause, while the stay in Paris of the Grand Duke
Alexis and his arrival at Vichy have been the occasion
of extravagant displays of interest and welcome.
Of course, the people who attend band concerts and
August 15, 1891.]
THE SPEAKER.
1H!J
run lifter I'orrifjn princes ni'ed not re|>rosent t)ie
mind <>r llie I'lencli eleeloriite oT ISlKt, any more tliiin
the nnisie-liuU puhlir in London in 1S7S represented
the mind of tiie !iKKi'ej;iite ImikHsIi eleetonite of l.SSO.
Still, we nnist eoinit on ii eertiiin decree of friction
with the Frencli (iovernment iind tlic l>'reneli press
just now — even after tiie interutitionHl courtesies of
next week — tis tlie b-Kyiitian (Question, to which we
refer elsewhere, jirohaljly will show us very soon.
Tlie lonjj report drawn up in the name of the
French I?ud),'et t'otnmission hy y\. (iodefroyCavaiKuac
indicates that a limit will soon lie set to the increase
of the National l)el)t of France. Comparing ISS;<
with ISiK), the juniMal estimates for the ordinary
budget ha\e fallen about I l.iKiii.iHIO francs, while the
extraordinary budget, which was then in<'reasing the
debt by about lil(i,()li(i,(Mi(l francs a year nett. will soon
be suiipressed altoKethci', though about 172,<Hl(i,()()(l
francs of this sum will have to liiul a place in the
ordinary annual exiienditure. The last loan, it is
hojied, marks the last ]iermanent aildition to the
public debt. The extracu-dinary budget was oovei-ed
by terminable S percent, rentes, which are now being
reduced by about (iS.(i(iO,l)l)() francs a year. This may
be set against tlie IT'J.odo.ood francs above men-
tioned, and the expansion of the revenue, it seems to
be ho])od, and the economies to be elTected, will do
the rest.
Tlie French and (ierman autumn manonivres are
this year on an exceptional scale. In south-western
France, three army corps will operate against a
supposed invasion from Spain — two niano'uvring
near Dax, while a third will be in reserve near
Toulouse. Near Rheims four army corps will man-
CEUvre for some weeks. The idea is said to be as
follows : — A German army, marching down the valley
of the Marne on I'aris, has detacheil two .army cor])s
to protect its left, which is threatened by French
troops. These cor})s — rei)resented by the Fifth and
Sixth Corps under General (iallifet — will meet the
Seventh and Eighth C'orjis in battle between C'liau-
inont andBrienne thefirst head(iuarters resiiectively
of the two armies on Sejjtember (ith and 7th. The
(ierman army will then retreat, but another battle
will take i)lace on Sei)teml)er Utli ami lOth between
Bar-sur-Aube anil Troves. On September rJth, both
armies are to unite under General Saussier, anil
fight against an imaginary enemy near N'itry le
Franvois. On Sejitember 11th the Pn-sidont will
review them.
The German manoeuvres are to take i)lace near
Cassel, and also in the Grand Dueliy of Baden. In
the latter, two army coi-ps are to resist an im-
aginary French army, which, coming by Belfort, is
sni)posed to have driven them back. A battle is to
take place close to the Swiss border at Basel, the
(•ernian troo])s being reinforced by means of a new
" strategic" line of railway from Constance. After-
wards some 4(),(i()0 men are to mameuvre in Alsace.
Alarming rejiorts have been current, esi)ecially in
France, as to the recent accident to the (ierman
Emperor. His knee has certainly been severely in-
jured— the kneecai), it is said, being dis])laced by his
fall on board his yacht and its treatment may not
have been very successful. I'rof. Esmarch, of Kiel,
whose reputation as a surgeon is European, has.
however, seen him, and reassuring reports have been
issued from oHicial and semi-oflicial sources, though
there is some discrepancy between them.
There has been fresh excitement about the
" Bochum scandals." Herr Fussangel, the West-
libalian journalist who had been sentenced to a
term of imju'lsonment for lil)elling the income tax
assessment committee of the town, and had made
startling revelations during the trial as to the
possession by the leading iron manufactory of the
neighbourhood of forged (iovernment stanijis for
marking rails as a sign that they had passeil the
requisite tests, had been accorded a respite, and
continued to publish his revelations. Kaily last
week he was summoned to undi'i-go his imprison-
ment : but he was not ready, and preferred to go
aliroail. His fiii-ud'- of course hi-ld tliat some high
ollicial was interesteil in putting a si(,p to the
publication. Indeed, n certain eagerness in that
direction has been vi--ible in olVn-ial rpiurtei-s from
the lirst. On Saturday morning, the body of Heii-
.Steiger, the chief engineer of the woi-ks, was found
near them, with a pistol lying beside it. Ap|>ear-
ances pointed to suicide rumour at lirst said even
to murder by persons interested in checking the
revelations; but it i- now said that it is he who
originally furnished the information to llerr l-'nsn-
angel's pai)er.
The (ierman l.ilier.il party are exultant over the
result of a bye-election at Tilsit in East I'l-ussia. In
si)ite, it is said, of the grossest abuse of their power
by the oHicials, the Conservatives, who have helil the
seat since ISSl.have polled nearly twenty jjer ci-nt.
fewer votes than at a bye-election in l-'ebruary of
last year. They attribute the l/iberal victory to the
Socialist vote : but it is very small, and the Socialist
journals counselled abstention. The hands of the
Liberals will now be considerably strengthened in
the campaign against the maintenance of the grain
duties, which at present lills so large a s))ace in
their papers.
Both rye and wheat rose sharply in Berlin on
.Saturilay in antici|)ation of the jn-ohibition of the
ex])ort of grain from Russia, and still more on
Wednesday — rye being now deaier than wheat.
Though the rejiort was exjiressly denied on .\londay
in a semi-official organ, a ukase was jiubli^hed next day
absoluti'ly jirohibiting the export of rye and rye-meal
from the Russian ports on the Baltic and Black .Sea,
or over her AVestern frontiers. The movement of
grain is to be facilitated by reducing railway rates;
jmblic works are to be inidertaken : the distressed
peasants are to have firewood free from the Crown
forests, and grain is to be i)\irchased and issued to
them by the local authorities. How the purchase
money is to be raised is not stated, anil the funds
available for the i)tiri)ose are known to be sca:ity.
The measure will maiidy affect (iermany, where rye
is a stajjle food, nearly ninety )ier cent, of that used
last year having, according to the Ti)ii< s. come from
Russia. It is a severe blow to the oj)tiinist view as
to harvest i)rospects so lately ex)iressed by the
(ierman Chancellor. According to one view, it lias a
political object- -to damage (iermany : but the state
of Russia makes this hyi)othesis a violation of the
scientific rule not to sui)i)ose more causes than are
necessary to explain the facts. But it is semi-otlieiallj-
announced that the grain duties in Germany will be
neither suspended nor reduced.
The yoiuig King of Servia has passeil through
X'ienna and reached Isclil. on his vi-it to the
Emjieror of Austria. The Austrian i)ress, of course,
are hastening to remind Servia that Austria is her
friend, not Russia. In the Russo-Turki-h war. it is
said, it was Austria that saved her after the defeat
of Alexiuat/. : and if she will only moderate her
I'an?lavist aspirations, Austria will be able to secure
to her a substantial share of the heritage of the
Sultan.
The Hiuigarian .Mini-try h.is passed its new
County (iovernment Hill of two clauses, empowering
the (iovernment to appoint certain otiicials and to
make regulations as to local goverinnent. This cen-
tralisation, it is said, will o]ien up the eountr.v. which
is notoriously rich, but unilcveloi>ed. to foreign
cai)ital. The new magistrates will be far easier to
deal with than the old si|uirearchy.
The failure of the leading bank at Trieste, owing
to defalcations by a s))eculating clerk, iind a series
of horrible murder- of Viennese -ervant-girl-. who
were decoveil awa>' by a woman ami her husband
under pretence of liuding them situations, are items
of .Vnstrian news this week.
A hitch has aiisen on the Swiss side in the
negotiati(Mis between .Switzerland, (iermany. and
Austria for a commercial treaty. But Switzer-
land has had other things to think about. The
Federal festival is just over, and Berne, which
190
THE SPEAKER.
[August 15, 1891.
has been oi-c-iii)ying the interval with a Geograjjliical
Congress, is now celebrating the seventh centenaiy of
her I'oiindation. Tiie historical plaj-, annoiniced for
to-day and to-morrow at 0 a.m., may be witnessed
by about l!t,()()0 persons, of whom ten thousand are
to be j)rovided with scats connnanding a good view
of the stage, while eight thousand more will have
standing room. About 900 j)ersons will be on the
stage at once, while 1,100 will take i)art in the liis-
torical jirocession of Monday. The school-children's
festival on Saturday afternoon should also be a
striking featui'e, anil some curious athletic sjjorts,
luitive to various ])arts of the canton, will, it is said,
be a feature of the celeliration.
The International Labour Congress, which will
meet on Sunday at Brussels, will ])robably exhibit
the considerable dissensions now existing among the
Socialists, especially in Germany, on the (|Uestion of
Internationalism c. Nationalism.
JJjevat J'acha, the Governor of Crete, has man-
aged to restore order among the Mahommedans
round Heraclia. But insurgent Greek bands had
begun to land in Crete, the Greek Nationalist press
has been urging the Greek Government to intervene,
and a section of the Greek inhabitants have, it is
said, invited English interference.
Two Frenchmen, managers of a French wine-
growing company in Turkey, have been carried
off by brigands from near Heraclia, in European
Turkey, not far from the Sea of Marmora, and a
ransom of eCT5,()00 demanded. The place is within
a hundred miles of the scene of the recent train
rol)bery, and the band is said to be the same.
The French (iovernment has insisted that the Porte
shall secure their rescue, and both are now fi'ee.
Four American warships have been sent to China
to i)rotect American citizens who may be endangered
by the ])oi)ular ujn-ising against the missionaries.
THE INTERNATIONAL HEALTH CONGRESS.
(By ONE OF THE PRESIDENTS.)
ri"^TIE complete success of the Seventh International
X Congress of Hygiene and Demogra])liy, holding
this week its meeting in London, is now assiu'ed.
This is not merely evident from the large mnnber —
close ujion three thousand British and Foreign men
of science who have enrolled their names on the
ofiicial list of members, but still more from the
charactei- and position of those names. There is
scarcely a country professing any claim to be termed
civilised which has not sent delegates, and it may
safely lie said that so long a list of men of light and
leading in the numerous subjects essential to the
health and well-being alike of the individual and
of the connmniity lias never liitherto been brought
together. One has only to glance down the lifty
clo.sely-iirinted jiages of theonicial list toconvince one-
self that tlie meeting togetlusr of so many ennnent men
must of itself prove fruitful of good results : but when
we look over the printed abstract of the jiapers which
have been or are about to be communicated to the
Congress, even those initiated into the mysteries of
bacteriology and demograi)hy may be forgiven if a
feeling of bewilderment at the innuense variety
and imjOTrtance of the subjects discussed and the
])robleins ))ut forward, occasionally oppresses them.
The inaugural meeting in St. .James's Hall on Monday
afternoon was a foretaste of what was to come. The
hall was crowded to sulTocatiou witli delegates not
only from every Kuro])ean coiuitry, but with many
others, both men an<l women, hailing fi'om the far
East of our great Indian ]"]mpire. Doubtless the
pri;sence of our genial I'rince on this occasion
added to the rush of the foreigners, and that great
aiulience which heard the short address delivered I)y
the I'l'ince, as President of the Congress, and listened
to the feeling reference he made to his own recovery
from severe illness some twenty years ago. nnist have
felt that the interest he takes in hj-gienic and sani-
tary (piestions is real and vivid. But the absence, at
the Prince's side, of every member of Her Majesty's
(iovernment ^yas much commented on. .Surely
on such an occasion it would have been only
courteous to our eminent guests that if the Prime
Minister could not appear, at least some member of
his Cabinet might have been told off for this dutj'.
Such an omission is not likely to raise the opinion of
foreign men of science as to the importance which
attaches in the mind of tlie successor of Bea<'onsfield
to that statesman's well-worn phrase of minitas oxmia
sanilas.
The Congress is divided into ten sections, each
presided over by an i'higlishman distinguished for
his knowledge of the special branch, and supported
by a long list of vice-presidents and mendjers of
Council both foreign and British. These sections are
all conveniently housed in the rooms of the various
scientific societies in Burlington House ; and this
we Londoners may say with truth, that in none of
the great Continental cities in which the former
Congresses have been held has the accommoda-
tion for the sectional work been so amjile or so
complete as it is hei-e. It is somewhat difficult
for the ordinary mind to grasp the extent of
the subjects treated of under Hygiene, and still
more puzzling to know what is the term under-
stood by Demographj^— and how jiuzzling it is,
may be seen from the fact that the Times of
Wednesday spells it in large capitals " Domo-
grapliy." That the former is more extensive than
the latter is clear from the fact that nine of the ten
sections are devoted to Hygiene, whilst one suffices
for Demography. This, we find, is after all nothing
more than our old friend Social Science, dressed up
to deal with Industrial Hygiene, and with the con-
ditions of communities from a statistical point of
view. It is presided over by Mr. Francis Galton, the
right man in the right place. He naturally gave an
interesting, though avowedly a somewhat speculative,
address on the betterment of the human race, in
which he called njjon his brother " Demographers "
to aid in raising the present miserably low standard
of the li'iman family to one '• in which the Utopias
in the dreamland of philanthropy may become
jjractical jjossibilities." Proposals to assist in securing
this laudable consummation is the work in which the
nine hygienic sections are in fact engaged ; but it
is of a modest character — these sections concern
themselves with very special matters. But as " many
a mickle makes a muckle," so the exact investigation
of the phases of life of a single microbe may open
out a method of prevention for some of life's greatest
ills, and the atteution to what may be thought by
some to be only petty details may save thousands if
not millions of lives. So each section brings its own
contributions of facts and conclusions to the general
weal, and matters which to the outsider seem most
trivial tiu-n out to play an important ])art in the
complicated ])henon>ena of life.
■That much has been already done during the last
half-century to imjirove the conditions of healthy
living, all acknowledge; but when Sir Josei)h Fayrer
tells us that one-fourth of all the mortality of
England is caused liy jjreventible disease, we feel
how much more has still to be accomjilished. In this
great work of life-saving every man of science has,
or may have, his share. The chemist and jjhysicist,
as Sir Henry Roscoe reminds us in his Presidential
atldress, work at the foiiudation of things. They
have to study the laws and explain the phenomena
upon which deiJend Ijoth physiology — the science of
the body in health and pathology — treating of the
body diseased ; and. without the hel]) of the chemist
and the jjhysicist, neither the ))hysiologist nor the
pathologist can do nuich.
The great interest of the day doubtless attaches
to the Bacteriological section, so ably presided over
by Sir Joseph Lister. It is here that the newest and
most startling revelations of modern science are to
be looked for. Thus it has long been a puzzle to
surgeons why in certain cases wounds heal well even
August 15, 1891.]
THE SPEAKER.
191
■when tlie i)atient.s are exjiosed to coiKlitioiis usually
fatal to ciinitive processes. On the batthvlidd
wounds of the most serious eiiaracter, dressed l)adly,
or not dressed at all, and swarming with i)ois{>nous
haeteria, are known someiinics to heal almost
mirac\ilously. .MetsehnikolT, of the Institut Pasteur,
has explained this a|)parent anomaly. Jt is true that
in sueh eases the outside and visihle jiarts of the
wound swarm witli i)athogenie organisms, but the
intei-nal surface of the wounded tissue is found to
be i)orfeetly healthy and (juito free from them, for
soon after the wound is made, the wandering i)ha-
goeytes are seen to pass out from the healthy l)lood-
vessels, and tliey at once sei/.e ujion and devour any
poisonous bacteria with which they come in contact,
and thus preserve in a healthy condition the layer
nearest to the wounded llesh. and enable tlie pro-
ce.sses of re-formation of tissue to go on. Such a
battle is always being fought, but the victory some-
times comes to the invading ho-^t, and it is only wlien
the defending forces are of sullicient number to rejjel
the attack that the citailel can be held. So that to
ensure a successful defence, aid in the shajjc of bac-
tericidal material must be brought in from outside,
andthisconstitutesthe i)rinciple of antisei)tic surgery.
Otlier sections concern themselves with no less
important questions. We have Sir Nigel Kingscoto
presiding over that iu which the relations of the
disease.s of animals to those of man are discussed.
Roux of Paris discourses in ehxpient French on the
pro|)agation and prevention of rabies, whilst the
question of the infection of food is treated of by
Brieger of Berlin. Next comes Mr. Diggle's section
in which the hygiene of infancj-, childhood, and
school-life, is considered. Then engineering in re-
lation to sanitation is confessedly an imi^ortant
subject : the burning (jiiestions of sewerage and
sewage disposal, water sup))ly. ])ollution of rivers,
and tow)i refuse, being discussed under Sir John
Coode. Lastly come naval and military hygiene
under Lord "Wantage, and State hygiene under Lord
Basing. Here is at anj- rate sco])e wide enough : and
the crowded condition of the sections, as well as the
animated discussions which have taken i^laee, show
that a real interest is taken Ijy all present in the
legitimate business: so that this Congress is by no
means a gigantic scientific ])icnic — though the social
attractions of the meeting are most alluring — but an
assembly of men determined to do what in them lies
to better the condition of their fellows of every rank
and of every nation.
JAMES Kl'SSELL LOWELL.
MR. LOWELL'S death makes agreatgaj) in many
associations; but Englishmen will think of him
first, perhaps, not as the accom])lished man of letters,
but as a rejiresentative of the Ijest tyi)e of American
citizenship, as a iiatriot who \vas never blind to the de-
fects of his country, as a iiublic man who made the cul-
ture of kindliness between two great nations, allieil by
blood and s))eech, no small i)art of his life. It seems
odd now to look back to the jjcriod of "storm and
thrust," when the American democracy was con-
vulsed by civil war, and fiiul Mr. Lowell amongst the
foremost to chide England for that sympathy with the
Soutli which was certainly manifested by aclass. Those
were the times when the brilliant writer, who little
thought that he would one day charm English
audiences with the oratory which is the highest
exiiression of a good digestion, bade Englishmen
with some sternness not to take too literally " w hat-
ever our Minister may say in the effusion that
comes after ami)le dining." The Minister who
suffered this re]n'oach was Mr. Reverdy .Johnson,
whose after-dinner cordialit.\' was contrasti'd by
Mr. Lowell with Mr. Adam-'s warning, "My lord,
this means war." Still more interesting in this
retrospect of extinct animosities is the famous
protest from Jonathan in the " Biglow Papers."
•■ It il.in't v • rn lianlly H«lit, .l'<l.ii,
AVlnii Ij'.th my li«ii(l« wuH lull,
To stiiiiiij iii> t'l 11 liKht, .lulin,
Vi.ii ( ouniu, III, ,I(j|iti Uull !
Oil- Cncli' S, Mv. he, ' I ifucss
W'- liMuw it now,* Hi-/, ho,
'Thij linn's j.riw is iiU the law,
Accor.liii' ti) .1. U ,
Tht-l's fit fi-r yoti an' nii3 I '"
There is more i)athos than fierceness in these lines,
and it is easy to understiintl now the passionate sense
of injustice which insjtiied them. Then and later Mr.
Lowell stood for what was Ijest in American man-
hood. No writer diil so much to hclj) the cause
which triumithed over slavery. Xo jjolitician had a
higher concejitionof statesmanship than he whowrote
the noble eulogy of Lincoln, and who believed that
his country came victoriously out of a great struggle
by virtue of " heroic energy, jjersistence, and self-
reliance." In latter da\s there; were some .\merican.s
who were indis|)osed to remember these services to
the conunonweal, and who treated .Mr. Lowell as if
lie were indifferent to the national sentimc-nt and
wedded to European ideals. But to the end of his
life he was keeidy sensitive for the honour of hU
country. Never a strong i»arty man, he took small
interest in the sordid struggles which make the chief
interest of American ])olitics. A true friend of
democrac}', he never hesitated to speak his mind
about those Avho betrayed the i)ublic welfare. His
denunciations of corrui)tion were as scathing as hi.s
satires on the slaveholders. He had a great con-
tempt for Fourth of July orators, who "debased the
standard of gieatncss," and he warned his cr)untry-
men that "i)oj)ular government is not in itself a
l)anaeea, is no better than any other form exce])t as
the virtue and wisdom of the i)eoi)le make it so" — a
lesson which no one who knows the working of
American institnti<ins will ever deem superfluous.
To this iiublic sjjirit Mr. Lowell added a literary
etiuiiiment which few men of letters have surpassed.
Though he once wi'ote that America must " submit
herself to the Euroi)ean standard of intellectual
weights and measures,' he always maintained an
inilepeudent quality of mind and style. One of the
most interesting things in the "Biglow Papers" is
the essa.\- on Yankee dialect ; and while he emjiloyed
that dialect ^\ith infinite humour in the dissertations
of Mr. Biglow ami his associates, Mr. I^owell pre-
served something of the native raciness in his most
finished prose. I'arlyle, he said, "called do^vn the
tires of hea\eii when he could not readily lay his
hand on the match-box;" but while he ne\t'r dis-
dained to turn to account the lowlier means of
illumination, Mr. Lowell could command at will the
higher lights of a moving eloepience. Most of his
))oems are full of fancy and tenderness. Without
any superlative gift, he was master of the chastened
exiiression of delicate feeling. In the " Biglow
Papers" lies the chief individuality of his verse, and
although most of it belongs to moods and incidents
which are of ))urely historic interest, and which have
a national rather than a universal character, some of
the humour will always be ))roverbial. .lohn P.
Robinson was an actual personage mIio has long
been forgotten even in the |)lace that bore him, yet
his name has a lasting significance in the famous
stanza —
■■]!ut.i..iiM r.
KoKinsirn he
Siz thcv diJu'tkujw ovoiytliin' Jiuvn in .luihc."
"A Fable for Critics" has striking illusti-ations
of Mr. LowelTs dexteritj- and variety. The form
seems a little old-fashioned to us now. much older
indeed than Ilosca Biglow's quaint locutions; but
the wit is so keen and the characterisation so deft,
that many of the rlnines share with Lewis Carroll's
the capacity of clinging to the memory when graver
matters have fallen into oblivion
" -VU women he damns with miilnliilr srmper.
And if ever he felt somi'thinir like love's rlistemi^^r.
'Twa.- towards a youu;; LiJy wh" spoke am iint Mexic.in.
And assisted her father in making a lexicon."
192
THE SPEAKER.
[August 15, 1891.
But Aiuericaiis may cherish, witliout any narrow
prejudice, the pithy phrases of Hosea Biglow's
" Pious Editor," whose maxims are still household
■words in the politics of the Southern States : —
" It's wal enough agin a king
To dror resolves an' friggi r.-,
But libbaty's a kind of thing
Thet don't agree with niggers."
The reader who eares for none of these beauties
of vernacular, may find amjile comi)ensation in Mr.
Lowell's prose. The stimulus of his style, the clear-
ness of his judgment, the catholicity of his taste,
ought to be a liberal education to some of his
coinitrymen. who offer us strange idols wifih robust
confidence and small knowledge. As a critic Mr.
Lowell had a large endowment both of culture and
native insight. His appreciation of Emerson is a
fine instance of his subtle perception. " Those who
are grateful to Emerson, as many of us are, for what
they feel to be most valuable in their culture, or,
perhaps I should say, their impulse, are grateful, not
so much for any direct teachings of his, as for the
insi)iring lift which only genius can give, and
without which all doctrine is chaff." That is an
admirable touchstone of Emerson as a teacher,
and it led Mr. Lowell, naturally enough, to depre-
ciate the influence of Carlyle. The essay on Carlyle,
moreover, has the inspiration of the democrat who
feels liimself a champion of the system on which
the philosopher of the " eternal verities " poured his
fiercest scorn. To Emerson, wrote Lowell, "the
young martyrs of our civil war owed the sustain-
ing strength of thoughtful heroism that is so
touching in every record of their lives." To
Carlyle the civil war was like "the bm-ning of a
dirty chimney." For this unflattering image, Mr.
Lowell took amjile revenge in another analogy
of combustion. " Imagination, if it lays hold of a
Scotsman, possesses him in the old demoniac sense
of the word, and that hard logical nature, if the
Hebrew fire once gets fair headway in it, burns un-
quenchable as an anthracite coal mine." But Mr.
Lowell's culture was too broad to make him a contro-
versialist in every field of literature. He roved through
the old English writers without observing the cloven
hoof of feudalism at every turn. His knowledge was
broad-based upon an active sympathy with the lives
of the people ; but he did not carry the sensitive-
ness of a young democracy into every corner of the
sphere of letters. Hosea Biglow transported himself
at will into the atmosphere of Chaucer, and Yankee
idioms were superseded by a dispassionate inquiry
into the origin of English metre. By the quality ami
extent of his sc-holarshij), Mr. Lowell was distin-
guished amongst his conqieers. By the dignity and
urbanity with which he discharged his duties as an
official representative of his country, he won the
respect of all classes of Englis-hmen. His gift of
speech, jjersuasive, picturesque, always exhaling the
essence of delicate thought and observation, was not
the least welcome exjjression of a rare personality.
He represented that development of the New
England mind in which the hard shell of Puritanism
is penetrated by the glow of a healthier experience,
and by a sympathetic vision, •' without which all
doctrine is chalT."
GLASGOW PROFESSORS AND THEIR WORK.
THE lines of Scotch Professors may truly be said
to have fallen in ])leasant places. To asso-
ciate ])overty with the Universities of Scotland is a
great, if a popular mistake. There may be needy
students north of the Tweed, as elsewhere, but so
far as the Professors are concerned, it is safe to
declare that in no country throughout the world do
their salaries mount u]) to such a sul)stantial sum.
Inequalities no doubt exist. Thus in Glasgow the
incomes range between £1,758 enjoyed by the
Professor of Mathematics, and £500 bv the Pro-
fessor of Astronomy, while in Edinburgh they
range between £1,254 in respect of Greek, and
£831 in respect of Rhetoric. But the averages, at
all events in the Faculty of Arts, are high, being
£1,337 for Glasgow, and £1.079 for Edinljurgh. All
this may be changed when the Ordinances now
being drawn u\t by the University Commission come
into force, but as yet the Glasgow Professor holds
an enviable position. He finds huuself first of
all in i)ossession of an income running into four
figures, lie has also a comfortable mansion in which
to live within the ])recincts of the College, and admir-
able class-rooms for the accommodation of himself
and his students. A sijlendid libi-ary and reading-
room a,Yc at his disjiosal, while the situation of the
buildings is unrivalled in any part of the city. As
for his -vVork. it rarely extends beyond six months in
the year. He has, moreovei-, any advantage that
flows from being connected with one of the most
ancient Universities of the country — an institution
whose liLstory is inseparably associated, throughout
its \vhole coiu-se, with the ])rt)gress of modern ideas,
seeing that its foundation, about the middle of the
fifteenth century, was contenqjoraneous with the
invention of the art of printing.
The ])resent head of Glasgow University — Dr.
John Caird — -xruist be looked iqion as no unworthy
successor to the long line of able and distinguished
men who have filled the office of Princi]3al. Born at
Greenott^ hi 1820, Dr. Caird graduated at the College
over which he noAV jjresides, and became minister of
Xewton-on-Ayr in his twenty-fifth year. He was
called to the Church of Lady Tester's at Edinburgh
in 1817, and it might have been thought that his
great gifts would have sjjeedily won recognition in
the historic ca])ital of the country. This was not
the case, however ; for two j-ears after settling in
Edinburgh he moved to the quiet parish of Errol,
situated abotit half-way between Dundee and Perth.
Up to that time, indeed, with all his marvellous
eloquence, Dr. Caird had failed to find his way to
the hearts of the j)eople. He was looked upon as
but little above the ordinary run of pulpit orators.
In illustration of this a good story has been pre-
served. While at Errol. Dr. Caird discovered that
the acoustic properties of the church were by no
means of the best, and, his congregation being scanty,
he suggested to the beadle that an improvement
might be effected by boarding up one of the side
aisles. "That may do all very well for you," replied
the shrewd old Scotchman, " but what will we do
for room, if we should get a ]ioi)ular preacher to
follow you'?" If the beadle lived to follow Dr.
Caird's career, ami to see him acknowledged not
only as the greatest ])reacher of his time, but as the
eminent chief of Glasgow University, he may have
come to the conclusion that at Errol he entertained
a genius unawares.
Dr. Caird came to Glasgow in 1857, was a^^
pointed Professor of Divinity five years later, and
has held the ]iost of Priiu^ijial since 1873. Unlike
some of his iiredecessors. Dr. Caird holds no minis-
terial charge in connection with the Princiiialship,
but he ])reaches once a month in the University
chapel during the si'ssion. and the calls made upon
his services in other ([uarters are far greater than he
can overtake. He is not a jitolific author, the only
works from his i)en, besides a volume of sermons,
being an essay on the "Unity of tlie Sciences " and
an " Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion."
He exercises no control over the teaching work in
the University, while his administrative labours
may be said to consist in presiding over the delibera-
tions of the Senate, and, in the absence of the
Chancellor, over the meetings of the University
Court. Di-. Caird might not find it easy to define
his own duties, but liis imnu'diate predecessor, Dr.
Barclay, had no such difficulty. When congratu-
lated in 185S on his appointment as Princiiial, Dr.
Barclay said, in his own ])ithy way, " Oh yes, I
deserve to be congratulated. There's a good house,
a fair stipend, nothing to do.and six months' holiday."
August 1/), 1891.]
THE SPEAKER.
197
ediu'ation u])oii lines not ilosijrned by their pastors
and masters. Tom docs his <|uai>tiim of Latin, and,
as k)nfj as he escapes absolute disgrace, fares little
how small a fraction of his intellipeneo he bestows
njion the task: the full lujwers of his mind are re-
served for framing the rules of the cyclinR club and
decidinfj whether or not Jones minor shall be allowed
to play in tlie eleven. These matters settled, he takes
his supiier with a sense of " somethinp; aeeomijlished,
somethiuK done," which no school success could
sui>|>ly, and prejmres himself with i)atience to
render unto C'jc-iar or .\cnoi)hon the dues which an
inct)mprelicnsil)lc late compi'ls him to give to those,
to him, eminently uninteresting personages. The
real business of life, however, he considers, is niean-
whili' at a standstill.
Who shall say that he is not right V It is at least
au o|)en question whether the education that goes on
in tlie playground is not quite as fruitful in good
results as that which is carried on in the sclioolroom.
There the boy learns to meet his fellows, to boar his
part in common amusements, to contend with-
out bad temper, and to subordinate self to party.
To these educating influences is now added, in
instinctive conformance to tlie s])irit of the time,
precisely the kind of training which is most needed
for the formation of good citi/.ens. In view of recent
develoi)ments of self-government, the increased jxiwer
of municii)alities and the new responsil)ilities thiinvn
npon local oi-gauisations throughout the kingdom,
there could be no bi'tter prei)aratioii for the duties
of a citizen than the ))raetic(> in the transaction of
business, the familiarity with methods of corjiorate
action, which our sehooll)oys and schoolgirls are
thus unconsciously acquiring. When our elementai'y
schools have tleveloi)ed their social life sufliciently
to induce the formation of similai' habits to a
greater extent than at pi-esent, they too will be
bearing their full share in the training of our citizens.
Hitherto the class-room has been too much the be-all
and end-all of their existence, and the cause of real
education has been retarded thereby.
OPEN QUlvSTlOXS.
TV. — What cax we do for thk Critu-s?
rilHE authors are going to have a nice little did) in
X Piccadilly all to themselves. I have heard that
critics are to be eligible for it : but, if this is so, I do
not think that many critics will dare to avail them-
selves of the opportunity. ^Vhere there are clubs,
there are dining-rooms; and where there are dining-
rooms, there are table-knives. Critic's cannot be
expected to run needless risks. Kven if there were
no danger, there would be uiii)leasaiitness. It would
be trying for a jioor little critic to enter the smoking-
room, and to see six authors with an archdeacon at
their head walk out in disgust and dignity. Besides,
critics are not so well paid as authors : they cannot
afford to dress so well : the\- would jirobably steal
the authors" hats.
But something ought to be done for tiie critics.
They sulTer much. First, their nerves suffer. They
have to read horrible stories aliout murders, and
ghosts, and mesmerism. This is ruin to tlu; nerves
of critics. They go skiiijiing lightly through the
first volume, fall into something awful, and are
brought home on shuchiers. Nobody cares. Tlien,
again, their ojiinions siilVer: they have their dearest
convictions assaulted by agnostical novels : Robert
Elsmere knocks their creed into space, and ^liss
Edna Lyall catches it as it drops. Lastly, their
hearts suffer from laceraticnis. The heroine, in
her sinqjle dress of some soft, white clinging
material, makes, iierhaps. her innocent little
mistake. We all know what that mistake is. She
sees through the foliage in the dimly-lighted con-
servatory the hero (it is not really the hero) kissing
(if it is- the hero, he is not really kissing, but re-
moving a lly from the eye) her black-haired rival.
(If it is the liero, and he »« ki.-^ing. then it is not the
rival but his own sister.) .She goes to her njom, and
flings herself on her bed, and at last finds the relief
of tears. All this telU .,n the critics. They want to
soothe her and comfort her ; or to wring her neck;
or to do something to -^lop her. All this snil'ering is
inseiiarable from the critic's regular work.
It isolnioiis that it is not exactly a club which
the critics re<iuire. It seems to be rather a hosjiital
or, perhai)s. an asylum. It must be some iilace
where they will be treated kindly, and where each
critic can be kept ap:ut from the rest. If they are
kejit together, they will fight. I have exaiiiined
certain articles on criticism by critics, ami I lind that
in all of them the writer seems to be trying to say
two things espeeiall\ :
1. ."My criticism and l"rench criticism is g(Jod.
2. The other is Ijad.
Now it is clear that critics who disaiijirove of
one another to this extent cannot safely be kept
together. That is the advantage of the asylum.
Kach could have a -eiiarate cell —a i)added cell.
The authors might provide the jjadding out of their
books, i)erlia|)s. But, on the other hand, there is
the (luestion of expense to be considered. Critics,
as has been already jiointed out, are not rich men.
If the authors ])ro\ided the iiadding, they might
think that they hail done enough : tliey are fre-
(|uently inclineil to think this. A cemetery would
be kejil up at much less cost than an asylum.
There would only Ije the initial exjiense for the
ground, and jiossibly some kind novelist would
lirovide a little plot. It could be planted with
wheat and tares. Mild oats, and other serials.
The inscriptions would cost very little, because
Englisli ci-itieisni is ^o sljockingly anonymous : and
tlie tombstones would naturally take the form of a
broken column. There is much to be saiil for the
project, but it is to be i"eared that the authoi-s would
bring it into contempt. They would call the critics'
cemetery the '• Saintsbiirying (iround," and that
would never do.
It is really very difliciilt to -.ay what we can do
for the critics. It is a (|Uestioii which has not been
del >a ted sutlieieiitly. People moreoftiMi ask fioir they
can do for tlio critics. During the dull si-ason perhai)s
we may be able to get iqi some correspondence on
the subject.
THE WEEK.
Mh. LowKi.i, wasso well known in London society
that he might almost have claimed to i)ass nnister as
an Englislimaii. He was very jiopular as a diner-
out, and those persons who in recent years were
invited to meet him in Belgravia and .Mayfair justly
esteemed themselves fortunate. His talk was lively,
.authoritative, bristling with facts and illustrations.
Perhaps it was suggestive of the critic rather than
thejioet: for it was only to his intimate friends, or
when moved out of his common mood, that .Mi{.
Lowi;ll revealed those " silent silver lights un-
dreamed-of" which were hidden from the common
gaze. In the many notices of his life which have a]>-
jieared in the daily pai>ers e(im]>aratively little atten-
tion has been ))aid to the wonderfully lieautiful sjieeoh
which he delivered at the great meeting of American
citizi'iis held in London after the assassination of
Prksidi^nt Garfiki.i). No more ex(iui>ite jirose
elegy was ever iiioiiduneed u))ona imlilic man, an<l to
read" it in the column-- of the newsiiapers was a delight
to mind and soul. But the s|)eech w;is badly de-
livered, and till' Americans who were pri\ileged to
listen to it failed to ))erceive its beauty. All their
;ipi)lause was gi\in to an Episeoiialian liishoji who
liad mastered the tricks of the platform.
Now here verily is a strange thing. It has seemed
good to the literary i-ritic of the J'all Mull Gazette
198
THE SPEAKER.
[Aiig-ust 15, 1891.
to sugpest that the i)lot of " Friend Perditus," a story
iu whifh the main incident turns upon a man's tera-
]Kn-ary loss of memory, must have been taken from
Mi{. Makio.v Crawi-ohd's "Witch of Prague," in
which tlie same incident occurs. Surely this particular
])lot is as old a'< the liills. It has been used in our
own time by such writers as Mr. Cl.\rk RrssKi.r,
and Mr. Cii.vri.es Rkaue, and it was useil more than
once before either of these authors was born. The
critic himself must have been suffering from tlie
affliction which befell Friend Perditus when lie
l)enned his egregiou.s statement.
The Times on Thursday morning drew attention
to the fact that " The Last Great Naval War," a
booklet which yn'ofesses to give an account 'A a
struggle to the death between England and France,
had been jniblished on the eve of the visit of the
French fleet to our .shores. We believe that this
coincidence ■was quite unintentional. IIaiii)ily, there
is nothing in Mr. " Nelson Seaforth'.s " brilliant
little book which can wound the legitimate suscepti-
bilities of the French. Indeed, it is rather English-
men who might comiilain that so brilliant and able
a strategist, so clever a writer, and so thorough an
expert in knowledge of our naval affairs, should have
l)ul)lishcd to the whole world the tactics which nuist
undoubtedly be followed if England should ever have
the misfortune to find herself at war with France.
The book has only been out a few days ; but is
already being talked of everywhere, and bids fair to
rival '■ The Battle of Dorking " iu ))opularity. In
every other respect it surpasses that over-praised
pamphlet.
In introducing to the English reader Tol.stoi's
study of Russian peasant character and satire on
tlie fads and extravagances of modern society in the
land of the Muscovite, translated by Dr. Dillon
under the title of the " Fruits of Enlightenment,"
Mr. Pinero })uts some things very well. The
modern English i)laywrigbt has not been in the
habit of publishing his plays, because of the injurious
condition of the American copyright law, which, till
now, has constituted the publication of his play a
serious financial loss, and because the )jublic likes to
take its reading easily. To imagine a great character
or a grand scene, in Shakespeare or Weisster,
demands a more exhausting mental effort than the
realisation of a creation of Th.\(;'KERAy or Dkkexs.
This intellectual indolence of the iniblic Mr. Pinero
would like to see overcome, for he thinks the
dramatic form is the nearest a))proach to the actual
rejiroduction of life, and therefore the most natural
setting for the study of character and incident.
What ^vill the novelists do if i)eoi)le begin to
read dramas instead? Will the exti-aonlinary time
then arrive, imagined by a fantastic individual, when
])eo])le will Ije paid to read novels?
Bi'T Mr. Pinero, as becomes an earnest artist, is
anxious to see our acting plays jjublished, because
authors, conscious that their plays will be subjected
to the cool and critical analysis of the study, will
feel it incumbent ui^on them to jiay closer attention
to the literary quality of their labours ; and also
because they will bo strengthened in their artistic
pur|)ose by feeling that there is now open to them a
medium of apiieal from the occasionally hastily
formed and indefinite ^•e^dict of the theatre to the
Avell-weighed. deliberate, and final ju<igment of the
reading jjublic.
Why is Lamartine not read? asks M. RAOtn,
RosifeRES. This, his centenary year, produced
l)lenty of harangues, and memorial verses, and paue-
gyi'ics ; yet from every quarter came the cry, " No
one reads LA.MAiniNE to-day." The main reason is,
doubtless, as .M. RosifeREs has it, that Lamartine had
not suflicicnt genius to invent an ideal world ; nor was
he able to concentrate in his verse thespirit of his time.
" That young man's language," said De Maistre, after
reading La.martine's fir.st volume, "is exquisitely
lulapted for the expression of his ideas. We shall
see what he will do when the age of ideas comes."
Tlie age of ideas never came, however. His fir.st
volume, " Meditations," remains the best of his
works. It is quite conventional in thought, and
rejieats the characteristic imagery of tlie later ]joets
of the eighteenth century: but although the amount,
the value, is the same, he has exchanged for the
c<)i)i)cr coin of his in-edecessors pieces of gold.
Are we forgetting in the vogue of General
JMarbot that there were others who wrote memoirs
of France's great jjeriod ? Messrs. Plon, Nourrit
cV Co. publish a collection of memoirs of the ancien
r(''</i)nc\ the Revolution, the Empire, and the Restora-
tion, the whole forming a gossiping history of
France. Beginning with Col'nt de Cheverney,
" introducer of ambassadors," in the reign of Louis
XV., we can follow Frencli history, home and
foreign, tlirougli more than two dozen volumes of
memoirs, souvenirs, documents, and all manner of
co'itfi divcrx by the Duchess de Tourzel, governess
of the royal infants from ITSU-D.j ; by the Mar-
chioness de Montagu, who saw tlie actors in the
French Revolution " neither tlirough the large nor
the small end of the telescope," but with her own eyes ;
by Baron Hyde de Neuville, who would not bend
to Napoleon ; by La Roche.iacquelin : by Metter-
NICH, and a bevy of lords and ladies, concluding with
the Marc(uis de Villeneuve's " Charles X. and
Louis XIX.," a very lively picture of the Court of
the exiled Bourbons.
If housekeepers are in earnest in wisiiinp in benefit tlie utienii'loyed in Knst
London, tliey shnuUl Imy Bryant & Mav'.s M;itehea, and refuse tlie foreign matches
which are depriving the workers in East London of a larj^e amount in weekly wagt s.
In his new novel, " Le JIari de Jacqueline"
(Charpentier), Andr6 Theuriet, who is a sort of
Ftcnch WiLLL\M Bl.\ck, returns to the unsophis-
ticated dwellers among the fields and woods, as in
his ])opular " Reiue des Bois." J.vt ch'eline de Noirel,
the heroine, is plain-looking, poor, dowdyish, ignorant
of books and of the world, with nothing to say for
herself, and yet she gains our interest and sympathy.
^I. Theuriet in his tenderness for women and
their faults reminds us of Jean Paul »iitnis his
spirituality.
Since Alphonse Daudet came up to Paris from
the South of l^'rance, the land of Tartaiiii has sent
out no more promising writer than M. Paul Ari'jne.
Wliat has hitherto been most noted about his work
is the success with which — liaving caused the Durance
to flow, as it were, in the channel of the Seine —
he has annexed Paris to Tarascon. " He is the most
Parisian of Provencals, and the most Proven<,-al
of Parisians:" and Parisian and Proveu^-al have
collaljoratcd in his new work, " Les Ogresses " (Cil\r-
pentier), the former suiJi)lying the observation, and
the latter the fant;\stic matter. It is a satire on
women, witty, poetical, very one-sided, but never
rancorous.
Two recently jiublished books dealing with the
Revolution are ]\L ^Maurice Alrert's "French Litera-
tui-e under the Revolution, etc.," and " Orators
and Tribunes," by M. Victor du Bled, with a pre-
fac^e by M. JuLES Claretie, both issued by Calmann
LitvY. The former was delivered as lectures to
young ladies, with this result among others — that iu
a study of Alfred dk Musset, unable to describe
De Musset as he was, M. Alhert has succeeded to
August 15, 1891.]
THE SPEAKER.
1!)!)
porfeotiou in deseribiiiK liiiii as lie was not. M. nv
Bled's bot)k is aiiocdotic — a iiiosaie, none the less
artistic because it is cousti-ucted of fragments.
Mr. Wii.i.ia.m S.\rART has followed up his adiiur-
able translation of Proficssok Buii.m-15awi;rk'.s
" Capital and Interest " with a version of his
'• I'ositive Theory of Cajjital" (Mac.MII.I.AN). I'Rt)-
FKssoR BtiiiM-BAWiaiK's purpose in this work is to
find for the vexed problem of interest a solution
whieh invents nothing- and assiuues nothing, but
simply and truly attemjtts to deduce the i)he-
nomeua of the format ion of interest from the
simi)lest natural and i)sychological ])rinci))l('s of
economic science. Mu. S.maut linds that I'koi'iossou
Boii.m-Hawkrk'.s theory challenges attrition by the
originality of its ideas and the thoroughness of its
treatment.
Till-; jirose translation of the Iliad issued Ijy
Mkssr.s. Pkrcivai, iV: Co. was the literary work of
Mr. PfBVKs's life. Begun in IS7I, it was comi)leted,
after many interrujitions, in 1SS4. Dr. K\i:ia\
AnnoTT is the editor, ;uid introduces the translation
with an exhaustive analysis of the Iliad.
Siiaki:;.si'i;are and Bitrns at least among our
great poets have been honoured with a Concordance.
Wordsworth, as yet, has oidy a " Dictionary,"
jjublished by the author, "Sin. J. R. Tutin,
of Hull, who was already known as being
responsible for several similar enterprises. Mr.
TfTix's useful volume contains indices to all
Wordsworth's allusions to persons and i)laces,
ai'ranged in sections to facilitate reference ; a
collection with index of all the familiar quotations ;
an a])i)endix containing a hitherto unpublished can-
celleil version of the " Ode to Duty," and other
matter. The edition is limited to six hundred
copies.
WILI.IA^r Ogilvir. of Pitteusear, a Professor in
Aberdeen in the eighteenth century, whose name is
hardlj- known now even in Scotland, wrote an
" Essay on the Right of Property in Land," in which
he forestalled Mr. HK^•R^■ (iKOiKa:. This pamphlet,
under the titleof •' Birthright in Land," is }mblished
by Messrs. Kegax Paul <S: Co., with biographical
notes by Mr. D. C. Mac Donald, of Aberdeen.
Ogii.vie. on account of his advanced ojainions, lived
practically as an exile in his own eountrj'.
A\'e are i)romised a Conservative comic weekly on
the lines of the American I'uck; to be called Bin Ben.
Why not call it The Primyose? Mr. W. Arlisox,
formerly of .S7. Stephen s Revicir. who is to be editor,
ought not to be in a hurry with his first number.
He should wait and take a lesson from Mark Twai.v,
who, rumour has it, is about to start a comic paper
in London to teach us '• how to do it."
A FREN'CH PROPHl>7r OP EVIL.
Paris, Au-iist llth.
THAT "old men are not always wise" is as true
now as when it was iirst said, but oM i)eo))le
are generally interesting and often delightful. When
a man has sjjcnt a long life in the service of his
country and in the ]>ursuit of learning, his ex-
periences cannot but be worth hearing. If retired
from the active pursuit of politics, the judgment of
a veteran has a special worth ; with nothing to gain
or lose, in a personal sense, during the few re-
maining years of life, opinions become singularly
dispassionate.
M. Barthelemy Saint-Hilaire is now in his eighty-
sixth year. The last decade has made little difference
in his external ap|)earaM(o, which is still remarkable
for its robustness. Free, happily, from inlirmities—
save a long-standing defect in one eye- the aged
scholar is able to piusue his studies and fidlil Ids
engagements with sei iijiiilous assiduity and exacti-
tude. Winter ;ind summer he rises befori- daybreak,
lights his lire, makes Ids coffee, and sits down in hw
study to commune with the immortal sjjirits of the
l)ast.
On enteiing the libiaiy, be(|tieathed to his friend
and i)ui)il by the i)hilns,,pber Cousin, one has a sen-
sation of anti(iuity. 'J'lds lioary head and strong
face with massive .jaw suggest the busts of Cato and
Seneca. The impression is intensified as the visitor
runs his eye over the seulptured images of the wise
men and deities of Hellas surmounting the book-
cases. By long eonnnerce with the originals or their
exponents, the oc<-upant ha.s not only imljibed the
genius of ancient Greece, but also taken on its out-
ward form. l'\)r, as he says, in rejily to a reference
to the article in the lulinhurijh Jleiien; (piestioning
the authenticity of the lately-discovered Aristotelian
lja))yrus: "When one has lived in intimacy so to
speak with Aristotle all one's life, it is not jjossible
to mistake his style, ^'ou, for instance, would not
coid'ound a i)assage of Macaulay with a jjlay of
Shakesjjeare, no more than we should the writings
of N'oltaire and Bossnet. The article in the J'Jdiri-
hun/li disi)lays great learning and pains to elucidate
the subject, l)ut I do not agree with the writer's con-
clusion that he was not in jjreseuee of a genuine work
of Aristotle."
But, besitles having studied the great Grecian
all his life. M. Saint-llilaiie has been Minister for
Foreign Affairs. It is true that this is now ten
years ago, during the eventful period of the Tunisian
occupation, for which stroke of i)olicy the executor of
the high works of President (Jrevj^ is by no means
disposed to go into sackcloth and ashes. He still
follows the course of affairs, domestic and foreign,
with an eager and somewhat troubled eye, and is
not slow to come to .a conclusion on the whole
matter. When I'rince Bismarck was so sunuuarily
got rid of last year the ei-deiaiit French Minister
thus judged the situation: — "I told my colleagues
in the Senate: 'The sole reason which can have in-
duced the Emperor to |)art with his Chancellor is
that M. de Bismarck ^\•as o])i)osed to a Russian
alliance.' And events have proved this to be the
case, in des])ite of the apocryi)lial letter of the
Prince i)rinteil by the Flr/aro (which has since been
denied l)y its alleged author). Russia has never
forgiven, and never will forgive, "SI. de Bismarck
for his conduct at the Congress of Berlin, and the
Prince knows it. ^Moreover, he knows what tiermany
has to fear from Russia, and so was not i)leased to
see the young Kaiser so eager to make advances
to the C/.ar."
"And you say the same thing about France,
Monsieur y" In this respect M. Saint-Hilaire has never
varied. He may ha\e become moi-e sce))tical as to
the fitness of his countrymen for Rei)ublican institu-
tions ; he has never wavered about the imi>olicy of
an alliances Ijetween .Muscovite despotism and tiallic
deniocrai-y. "Let there be no ndstake about this,"
rei)eats the aged statesman. " Russia wants Con-
stautinojile, and l-'rancc desires her lost provinces; a
bargain is to Ijc strni'k on this basis understood if
not expressed — in which we stake the independence
of our country. For if defeated, as would be most
likely, we -houlil be dismendjered ; I'ranee would
suffei' the fall' of Poland. It is absurd to su])|)ose
that there is any les-^ issue at stake. Russiti has not
renounced her as|)iiatii>ns. and uevei- will until they
are attained. It was to jireveiit this, the seizure of
the key of the worlil, as Napoleon called it at the
Congress of Erfiirt. that we sacrificed the lives of
IdU.OOO soldiers in the Crimea. A\"hen I think of the
future I fear for my country " and the solemn
features of the gazer into futurity assumeil the
asi)ect of a seer. " Yes." ho repeate<l, in mystical
manner, " I see it all. clear before me."
200
THE SPEAKER.
[August 15, 1891.
It is easy to smile at these visions as it was to
laufrh at Heine's jirophccy of the burning of Paris,
but wlio shall say what the future may not have
in store ? When one has been born under the
shadow of the H evolution, and lived to see Kings and
Emjierors driven from their thrones, and Anarchy
set up on high, the mind must be prone to foresee
things darkly. To the eye of the i)hilosoi)her the
l)rosi5ects of his country are not reassuring. There
is the old proneness to run after jihantasies, to
imagine vain things, and to cherish delusions.
Ministers go about the country i-epeating their little
sayings, ha]>j)y if by chance they say a good thing.
Boiilanger is done for, but Boulangism is not extinct.
If the man had not been a rogue he would have
succeeded. The j^eople are no more Rei)ublican to-
day than they were thirt j' years ago ; tliey simjily
ask to be governed. The President but here we
trench on delicate ground, and it is best not to
repeat that "a perfectly honest man can become a
jierfect " Also on the rivalry of his successors,
about which some pithy words were sjioken, it is
well to draw the veil. It is not material for gossip,
but matter for instruction that we look for in the
house of the sage.
Reverting to the dominion of letters, we once
more have occasion to remark the wonderful fresh-
ness and lucidity of the old scholar's mind. He re-
peats from memory the various editions of the Dic-
tionary of the Academy— 1693, 1715, 1834, 1S7S—
confirming his recollection by reference to the great
work in his library, which in every case proved
correct. He tells of his collaboration with Littre
for sixty-five years — " that lay Benedictine who
worked thirteen or fourteen hours a day, and left
a monument far more naiant than our dictionary" —
he hits off a rapid sketch of his colleagues in the
Palais Mazariu still engaged over the letter A, and
pronounces the scheme of the " Dictiounaire his-
toriane " to be imc folie.
In a raj)id survey over the face of the globe, the
sagacious student dwells with ])ride and ]ileasure
ou the work performed by England. Incidentally
we are assured that it is a mistake that England or
the English arc so unpo]3ular as writers like Paul
de Cassagnac and Charles Laurent would make us be-
lieve. He, almost alone among his countrymen, re-
joices that '• you exclude the works of M. Zola, to
prohibit the sale of obscene ])ictures." The moralist
regrets tliat he cannot see the trace of a like si)irit
here. As a thoughtful student, this experienced
observer acknowledges that the day will come
when the British Empire shall become a thing of
the past ; but he hopes that all Britannia's chil-
dren will bear proudly their heritage, and avert
the knell of doom by maintenance of the traditional
(lualities of the race. All these, and many other,
things are saitl by this lively octogenarian, who
goes to spend the vacation Avith 3Ille. iJosne,
Mme. Thiers' sister.
A CORRECTED CONTEMPT.
ri'lHE whistles had sounded, and we were already
I moving slowly out of St. David's Station, Exeter,
to continue our journey ■westward, when the door
was pulled open and a brown bag, followed by an
over-dressed young man, came flj'ing into the com-
partment where I sat alone and smoked.
The youth scrambled to a seat as the door
slammed behind him : remarked that it was "a near
shave:" and laughed nervously, as if to assure me
that he found it a joke. His face was pink with
rnnning, and the colour contrasted unpleasantly with
his pale sandy hair and moustache. He wore a
light check stiit, a light-blue tie knotted through a
" Mizpah " ring, a white straw hat with a blue
ribbon, and two diamond finger-rings, doubtfully
genuine. One felt that, in moments of candid
self-communion, he owned his aiipearance to be
" rather nobby." Being conscious, however, that it
needed a few rejiairs, he opened the brown bag, jJuUed
out a duster and (licked away for half-a-minute at
his l)rown boots. Next, with a handkerchief, he
mopi)ed his face, and wi|)ed romid the inner edge
first of his straw liat,and then of his collar and cutTs.
After this he stood up, shook his trowsers until they
hung with a satisfying gracefulness, produced a
cigar-case — covered with forget-me-nots in crewel
work — and a copy of the Sporting Times, sat down
again, and asked me if I could oblige him with a
light.
J think the train was passing Dawlish before the
cigar was fairly started, and his jiink face hidden
behind the pink newspaper. But even then his
mann'uvres allowed me no rest. Between me and the
wholesome sea his diamond rings kept flirting round
the edge of the Sportin;] Times, his brown boots
shifting their position ou the cushion in front of him,
his legs crossing, uncrossing, recrossing, his cigar-
smoke rising in cpiick. uneasy jjuffs.
Between Teignmouth and Newton Abbot this
restlessness increased. He dropped some cigar-ash
on his waistcoat and arose to shake it otf. Twice or
thrice he picked \\\i the paper and set it down again.
As we ran into Newton Abbot Station, he came over
to my side of the carriage and scanned the small
crowd upon the platform. Suddenly his colour
mounted to a furious crimson blush.
The train stopped, and he hesitated for a moment;
then bent aci'oss, and, opening the carriage door,
stepped out.
A little old man with an insignificant face, a
greenish-black suit that spoke eloquently of con-
tinued depression in some village retail trade came
tottering up, his watery eyes full of pi-ide and
gladness.
" Whai. Chorley, lad, there you be, to be shure —
an', gude "eart alaive ! if I han't been glazin," these
vorty zecconds at a girt stranger chap, thinkiu" he
raus' be you. Shaake your old father's fist, lad.
You'm lookin' as peart as a gladdy — ee's fay
you be." ^
The youth, consumed with a miserable shame, put
his hand into his father's, and tried to withdraw him
a little up the platform, so as to be out of hearing.
" Noa, uoa ; we'll bide where us be, zoa's to be
handy vur th' train when her ztarts off. Her don't
stay no while, to menshuu. I vound Zam Grigg
zarvin' here as porter — you mind Zam ? Danged if
I knowed en. at vurst, the vace of en 's that altered ;
but her zays to me. ' how be gettin' on, Izaac "? ' an'
then I zaw who 'twas— an' us fell to talkin' "bout
how long the train ud stap here, an' th' upshot es
that her staps vaive minnits — — "
His sou interrupted him with mincing haughti-
ness.
" 'Ow's mothaw?"
'• AVeist an' ailin,' pore sowl — turble weist au'
ailiii'. Herd ha' come to gie thee a kiss, if her'd been
in a vit staiite : but her's zent thee zummat "
He searched the tail ])Ockets of his threadbare
coat, and i)roduced a greasy pajier of sandwiches and
an ai)i)le. 1 saw the young man wini'e.
'• Her reck'ned you'd vcel a zinkin' i' the stonnnick,
travellin' arl the waay from Hexeter to Plymouth.
There,— stow it awaiiy. Not veelin' peckish";' Never
mind : there's plenty o' taime betwix' this an' Ply-
mouth."
'• No, thenks."
" Tut-tut, now " There was a brief struggle, at
the end of which the youth accei^ted tlie packet, on
which spots of grease were slowly extending over
the white papei- wrapper. The little man looked
wistfully up in his son's face : his eyes were full of
love, but seemed to search for something.
" There, now. Chorley — Zinime I've been doin" arl
the tarlk, an' your mother '11 be i)uttin' me dree-
score o' questions, when I gets whome. How dost
laike it, up to Hexeter ; an how"st get along"?"
" Oh, kepital — kepital. Give mothaw my love."
" E'es shin-e. Fainely plaised her'll be, when her
August lo, 1891.]
THE SPEAKER.
201
hears tbee'rt zo naicely adrest. ller'd niaiide iij) lici-
maind, pore sowl, that arl your Ijuttons lul be out,
wi'out her to zee arter num. J5iit I dechire theo'rt
(h-est laike a to)izawycr."
And with this, somehow, ;i silence I'ell between
the two. The time ran on, and the old man. tlioufrh
he knew he would l)e cross-examined on every second
as soon as lu- reacheil home, shil'tcd his Axeipht from
one foot to the otiier, and had not :\ word. The
younjr couiiter-juni])er nuuiibled a word or two and
averted his eyes fioni his father's (quivering lip, to
stare uj) the phitform.
At last the old man said — •
"That there's a stubbard-ajJiile you've fjot in your
liand."
'• Yes ; so I see."
The guard shouted, "Take your seats, ])lease,"
and held the door while they shook hands again.
"Charley" leant out at the window as our tr.iin
moved olT.
" Her comes from the zeccond tree i)ast th' inyon-
bed — al'ays the vurst to raijjen, tliat there tree."
The jjoor old man broke into something resem-
bling a run as he followeil our carriage to .shout
the next sentence.
"Turble bad zoasou viu- /.aider!"
AVith that he halted at the end of the platform,
and watched us out of sight. His son flung himself
on the seat, and drew a long breath. It was twenty
minutes before his blush faded, and he regained con-
fidence enough to ask me for another match.
.Just eighteen months after, I was travelling up to
London in the Zulu express. There were half a dozen
passengers in the comjiartmeiit with me : and when
we halted at Newton Abbot, another stepi)ed in — an
old man, in a black suit.
I recognised him at once. And yet he was changed,
almost woefully. He had fallen away in flesh : the
lines, 1 thought, had deepened beside his upper
lip : and in sjiite of a glossier suit, he had the
appearance of hopelessness which he had not worn
when I saw him for the first time.
He took his seat, looked about him vacantly, and
caught the eye of an acquaintance — a ruddy farmer,
with thick grey side-whiskers — who nodded from the
far corner.
"Travellin" up to Exeter':'" a.sked this farmer,
with a curiously gentle voice. The old man bt-nt his
heatl for " j'es," and I saw the tears s])ring into his
weak eyes.
" There's no need vur to ax your arrand," the
other went on. drop])ing his tone almost to a whisper.
" Xaw, uaw. I be goin' up to berry en — e'es,
VTiends," he went on, looking aroinid and asking,
with that glance, the sympathy of all jnesent, " to
berry my zon, my clever zou, mj- only zon." ^'f
Nobody spoke for a few seconds. Then the kindly
farmer observed —
"Aye, I've heerd zay "a was clever to his trajide.
Uxtable an' Co., his employers, sjioke very han'some
of en, they tell me. I can't call to maind, tho',that
I've a-zet eves 'j)ou the voung man. since he was a
little tacker."
The old man began to fumble in his breast-
pocket, and drawing out a i)liotograph, handed it
across.
" That there's the last that was tuk of en."
" Pore young cha])," saitl the farmer, holding up
the likeness in front of him, and studying it ; " pore
young chap ! Zuch a respectable youth to look at !
They tell me 'a made ye a good son, too."
" Good ? " The tears rolled down the father's
face and .splashed on his hands, trembling as they
folded over the head of his stout stick. "Good? I
b'lieve, vriends. ye'U call it good when a j'oung man
zends the third o' his earniu's week b>- week to helj)
his ])arents. That's what my zou did, vriun the
taiine he left whome. An' presunts — never a month
went by. but zouie little gift ud come by the jiost-
man : an" little 'twas he'd got to live 'pon, at the
best, the dear lad "
The farmer was iia-^ing back the jihotograph.
".May 1 see it':"" I asked : and the old man nodded.
It was the same face -the same suit, even -that
had roused my contc iii|)t eighteen months before.
I'RO.M TIIK MOLNTAINS.
COME up lulu tlio iiiouulaiiis. Set your feet
Liglit-licurliMlly upon tlu'ir wriiiklfd IIiM>rs.
And U'tive tlie valli^y to it« Binile. Be yunrs
To si-.ile the trend, ..< of tin- licaviru.s nnil meet
Till' mighty wind iipm its throned .se:it.
Ci.nii- up intij the niuuutuin.s. (jrief and care
Make liaggard evni llie diviuest vale,
And I);iflied liopes hliall hardly lo.se their palo
Complexion in tliat soft and gentle air.
Having a need they may not cancel there.
.Set tliem upon tlie moiuitains. Bid them climb, .
Storey by cloudy storey, .some vast hill.
And there, erect upon its pinnacle,
Deliver them to pro.sences sublime
That know not space and have forgotti;ii time.
Amuose Bennett.
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR.
THE SITCATKlX IN' IRELAXD.
Sir, — I have read with a pleasure I cannot indicate your
leading article in your issui' of last Saturday — ■"' Home Rule
To-Day." It is an article not only luminously clear, but it is
also — and this is vastly better — an article luminously fair. You,
an English Protestant Lil)eral. have no misgivings about the
Irish Catholic priestliood; you say they have their shortcomings,
certaitdy. Wlio is without shortcomings!' Who omni hora
sopit i You trust tliem. an<l wisely, because they are in their
corporate capacity the best and the most iuHuential ujiholders of
the "civil orders'' the world has ever had. An Englishman,
and not a Catholic, you refuse to ignore what the English peojde
owe to the Catholic Church. The things you love most— the
keeping of the kingshi]) within its (jwu province, trial by jury,
the legitimate upholding of tlio masses against the illegitim.ito
action of the classes, the ditf u.sion of education, etc. ; all these
things — England's glory today — came when England was but
a young n.ation. aiul from the Catholic Church. You don't be-
lieve in tlie idiocy that wo\dd lead a Catholic to deal unfairly
with a man simply because he h.ippcns to be a Protestant. The
Tory party — English. Irish, and Scotch — in the days <iuite
recent, spat upon Parnell; he was in its nostrils a filthy smell.
To-ilav the saiil party u])hol(ls Parnell! Wliv — because of
better" thoughts — liei'iiuse it deems him right ■■ No. To the
Tory party Farnell will be always Parnell. But because ho
lias become the evil sjiirit of discord among tlie Irish people,
because \w is doing his level best to keep from them what tliey
are justiv entitled to — if you will — fair government from with-
out ; or. if you prefer it, fair government from within, neither
of which the Tory jiarty seems willing to concede. The man-
date that bids a man " do unto others as he would have others do
unto him." seems to be outside the ken of the Tory jiarty. The
Irish people must still lu — if this party can secure if — " the
hewers of wood and drawers of watiT ; " and because Parnell
helps tliem to attain this end. they write him up. In vain '. The
end is coming, comiuir ipiickly. and the outcome of centuries of
illwill. bitterness, and injustiei- will be the union — not again to
be broken— of '■ John " and " Paddy."— Yours, Mr. Editor, ever
fHithfully. Sacerdos HiBERNICCS.
August 10th, fSLi).
M.P.'S. AS COMPANY DIRECTORS.
Sin, With reference to the remarks in your issue of this
week im members of the ( tovernmeiit and members of Parlia-
ment being either journalists or directors of companies. I should
like to sav a few words.
1 do not think anyone can justly object to any M.P. writing
for the press. If he signs his articles he merely delivers a
speech to a larsrer audience tlian he could adilrcss ririi roct. and
unsiirned articles are judged on their intrinsic merits.
The case of an M.P. who is the director of a company is a
verv dilferent matter.
I think it is one of the scandals of the present day that so
manv men should enter Parliament merely to adv.auce themselves
tiuaiiciallv bv becoming mure in re(me.st as directors of companies
owin" to the magic letters " M.P." after their names.
202
THE SPEAKER.
[August 15, 1891.
I innst not pfive any iiainos, but would rclVr your readers to
the " Directory of Directors."
I think all M.P.'s should be disqualified l)y law from sitting
on any board of directors. — I remain, your obedient servant,
J. ConiUHouN Reade.
Brooks's, St. James's Street, August lOtli, l8i)l.
[OuE correspondent falls into tlie mistake of confounding legiti-
mate commercial undertaking.s with bubble comjiauies. It
is not only as directors of business affairs that members of
Parliament turn their position to account. — Ed. Speaker. J
A LITEEAET CAUSERIE.
The Speaker Office,
Friday, August Htli, 1891.
TRULY we are all in a delightful mess. Mr.
W. D. Howells writes au essay on " t'riticisni
and Fiction," in which lie begins by demonstrating
that any remarks he luaj^ proceed to make can
possess no value at all, and at once proceeds to make
a number possessing very great value indeed. Next,
because Mr. Howells' language is truculent rather
than conciliatorj^ his English critics miss all advan-
tage they might extract from his book, and begin to
ask him unpleasant questions which are quite beside
the mark. 1 confess myself one of those sinners. It
seemed, a fortnight back, pertinent to ask him how
on earth he reconciles with his fairly rigid theory of
novel-writing the indiscriminate jiraise he bestows
on every man, woman or child of American birth
who hajjpens to have \vTitten a book. But the ques-
tion is of little moment, and clouds — as Mr. Howells'
olTensivc obiter dicta cloud — many more important
questions which might easily be discussed with
serenity.
Again, let us observe the muddle which English
novelists have made with the theories which Mr.
Howells is not alone in holding. It is not so very
long ago, after all, that the dove-cotes of our fiction
were lluttered. Somebody shouted that we were
sunk in convention, .slaves of Mr. Mudie, producers
of boarding-school literature, etc. etc. — the phrases
already stick in the throat, so pei-sistently have they
been repeated. And really the energy with which
our novelists at once east abont and tried to be
French, tried to be Russian, tried to be naughty
and bold and bizarre, tried to be everything but
what God made them, must .apical anyone who looks
back on the work of the last two years or so.
Take Mr. Hardy, for instance — Mr. Hardy whose
beautiful phrase haunted the memory, whose tales
contained the sweet essences of Englisla i)astoral life,
and whose heroines sprang from the soil, cajiricious,
cajitivating, and quite sufficiently naughty. He took
the alarm. It seems but a few weeks since he began
to show signs of it, and wrote a ))lea for a locked
book-case. He, the creator of Fancy and Bath-
sheba and Eustacia and Grace Melbnry de-
manded a cui)board in which to be French. This
Avas terrifying. But in a few months he grew bolder.
The shyness jiassed off, and its natural demand, the
cupboard, Avent with it. The other day he gave the
world his " Group of Xoble Dames." The bookseller,
of whom I procured my copy, said nothing of the
padlock ■which I expected to be included in the price
of the book. He simply wrapped up the volume in
brown ])a]ier. and seemed to think lie had given me
my money's worth.
I have read manj' reviews of this work. One
critic, who must be a joy to his friends, called it
" a capital book for the smoking-room," and meant
the remark for i)raise. But he is the one luminous
spark, calm and certain, in a general fog. His fellows
di.slike the book somehow, but do not say why. even
if they know. They have a dazed impression that
Mr. Hardy has become very " real," and " realism "
owjli t to be all right ; so they observe vaguely that
the author's style has deteriorated, that his faults
of construction show more prominently in a short
tale, that he is happier with rustics than with noble
dames, etc. etc.
This is the merest nonsense. The truth is that
yiv. Hardy is striving to be French; and a more
painfully comic spectacle the ])itiless gods never
laughed over. A hay -maker, who should wear
patent-leather boots and an imi)erial to .set off his
corduroys, were not a more unseemly sight. De
Maupassant might be a thousand times as indecent
without shocking lis, while Hardy's conscientious
naughtiness smells to heaven. There are ten stories
in the volume, and as one after the other of the
author's heroines goes wrong, merely to .show that
she doesn't care for Mr. Muilie, the farce grows a
little too ghastly. But it is written that as a
man is great so shall his degradation be deep when
he plays tricks with his genius.
His style, it is said, has altered sadly in this work.
Of course it has : and so must any man's who ceases
to write what is in him. As for his faults of con-
struction, which are supposed to show more pro-
minently in a .short tale, let the critics, who suppose
anything so absurd, at least remember that this
same man has written " The Three Strangers" — a
ghost story which, in mere construction, cannot be
beaten by any in our language.
Another book which has been hotly discussed this
year is Lucas Malet's " The Wages of Sin." Much
that Canon MacColl has said about it is true enough.
The strength of the story is not to be denied ; the
advance it marks is amazing. Only upon one point
can I quarrel with the subject. Why, I ask. will
writers be always selecting their own temperament
— the artistic temperament — for analysis and study?
It is a rare temperament — thank Heaven — and
the conclusions based on a study of it are quite
inapplicable to nine hundred and ninety-nine
thousandths of the human race. A genius, such as
James Colthurst, is as abnormal as an idiot, and
much rarer. The one excuse for an artist's existence
is that he depicts his fellow-creatiu-es : and just at
present he is for ever painting himself and his
troubles. One would think, to judge from the books
written nowadays, that this planet was crowded
with Dick Heldars and James Colthursts. Why
may not the grocer have a chance? Grocers before
now have gone wrong and earned the wages of sin.
Also I had studied Colthurst before, in Zola's
" L'(hhiirc." and knew what his difficulties would be.
But it is when we come to Lucas Malet's method
that we observe the compromise between Fi'ench
and English workmanshij). I'ossibly no more ho]>e-
less concession was ever made to jM)])ular British
taste than the death of Colthurst, in the last few
pages. It knocks the reader on the head, and it
knocks the whole book inside out. If I under.stand
the writer's purpo.sc, it was to exhibit the cumulative
effect of sin in wrecking the sinner ; and to toss the
sinner over a handy cliff when he is bracing himself
to bear the heaviest burden of his life, is just to play
ninepins with art. There was a certain Roman,
according to Tacitus, who threw his wife out of
window " for uncertain causes." Unless it hapjiened
in deference to the circulating library, I confess that
Colthurst's neck was broken for reasons equally
vague.
Again, who but an English lady could have con-
ceived the idea of writing such a story with a running
commentary almost in the style of Thackeray? For
pity's sake, if our art is to be French, let it be all
French.
August 15, 1891.]
THE SPEAKER.
■20:i
Hut is tlierc any roasoii why wo- shnuld stiiiKKlc
to bt" Krt'iK'h or Russian or Amei-icau or Scaii(liiiavinu
or Sijanish? Wliat wo can Icarii from tlif novelists
of liioso countries is just to sit down and describe
truthfully what we see about us. AVe do not see -
whatever Mr. Stanliope Forbes may paint— mueh
French life about us: we cannot, if we try. see what
Tolstoi se.;s, siiujily because Kngland and Russia aie
two dilVerent countries. All that we can learn from
him, from Bjiirnsen, or IVom N'aldes. is to tell tlie truth.
When we do this, we may count on the admira-
tion of the foreigners. Mr. Howells, for instance,
who is not disposed to love any work ])roduced in
P^ngland, can hardly speak too reverently of Jane
Austen. But to see our novelists running up and
down in a panic, and trying to be foreign, is sadden-
ing. For unless we assume that all nations are
alike, the truth about l-^-ance is a lie about Russia,
and the truth about Russia a lie about England.
A. T. (.1 C.
REVIEWS.
THE LABOUR MOVEMENT IN AMERICA.
The Lahouk J[ovemf.nt in Ameuica. By Kichard T. Ely, Pli.l>.,
Associate in rolitic:il Economy, Johns Hopkins University,
l.unilon: \V. lleiu.--ninnn. 1S91)'.
rpHE United States furnish not only a wider field
JL than any other country for the study of industrial
movements, but a more rich and varied experience.
The laws of the several States are in many points
dissimilar : diffci-ent kinds of labour exist in the
different regions of the country, and give birth to
different kinds of organisation. The masses of the
peojjle have long ])pssessed a remarkable talent for
organising themselves, and have been allowed by
the democratic and individualistic structure of
society facilities for associating themselves into
trades unions and other sorts of fraternities which
the workmen of most countries in Europe might
envy. Moreover, the working classes, since they
constitute the majority of the voters, have been
able to ])ut into i)owei- such legislatures and otlieials
a.s they desire, ;ind to obtain the laws which best
suit them. Tliere has never been a nation among
whom all experiments in the W'ay of social and in-
dustrial reconstruction could be so readily tried
and would be .sure of being so fully recorded. One
might therefore expect that the Socialists and Com-
munists anil Anarchists of Europe would look with
peculiar interest and satisfaction to America as the
land where tlieir ideas would have the best prosj^ect
of taking i)ractical shajjc. The contrary, however,
seems to be the case. .Much disa])pointment with
America is expressed by tlie leadsu's of these ])arties,
and by those who in the jiress expound their views.
They conii)lain that the Americans are too contented
and self-satisfied to desire radical changes. They
declare that nowhere is capital more powerful,
more grasping, more audacious. Working men may
appear to hold ))olitical sujiremacy, but they are
somehow jn-evented from using it. They cannot
extricate themselves from the toils of ])arty, witli
its comiilex system of organisation. They have not
the proper degreeof hatredtothe so-called honrjjcoisic,
the retiuisite jiassion for overturning the existing
order, and clearing the grouiul for the establishment
of something better.
The exi)lanation of this strange contrast between
possibilities and results in the United States, and
the descrii)tion of the various forms which schemes
of industrial reform and industrial revolution have
taken, would sui))}ly matter for a most instructive
treatise ; nor could such a treatise come at a moment
more suitable than the jjresent, when '• Labour Ques-
tions " are all the fashion. We opened Mr. Ely's
book in the hope of finding such an explanation and
description, knowing him from his other books to
be a thouglitfiil and well-informed writer, warmly
interested in these subjects. We must, however,
confess to some disapjiuintment. He has a habit—
Ijcrhajis more common in America than in England —
of mixing up his sentimenis and his sympathies with
his facts and reasoning, so as to give a character of
wooUiness ami llulline^s to his whole treatment of
the subject. Hot bla<k colTee is good, and cold
water, either before tin- i-offee, as in the East, or
after it, as among the I'lanks, is also good. But to
ixmr the colfee into the water, or the water into the
colTee, is to spoil l)otii. The book is fre<|uently vague
just where ])reci>^ioii was neeiled, and gives us ex-
cellent morality where we needed hard facts. We
are told very little either about the Knights of
Labour or about the altem))t to work a universal
boycott, though these ai'e among the most interesting
l>henomena of the .Vmerican Labour struggles. Still,
the book contains a good deal of useful information
which it would be hard to find elsewhere, and it is
written in a sjiirit of laudable fau-ncss and tolerance.
One of the ((uestions most often asked regarding
American Co-oi)erative enteriirises and trade or-
ganisations is why they liave not giown faster and
taken de«'i)er root than in l-Jngland. Mr. Ely sug-
gests some explaniilioiis. He thinks that "in no
country in the civilised world have the lalionrers,
as such, been so isolated as in the large industrial
centres of the United States." They have received
far less aiil from men of intellect and ])osition than
in England or Germany. " Other obstacles in the
way of tlie success of Co-oj)eration are these — un-
steady employment, roving habits, the heterogeneous
character of our jjoindation — all preventing that
consolidation and amalgamation of the masses which
co-operation requires." lie adds another reason,
which has unich force — viz., that in the United
States there exists ar. unec|ualled " nuiltii)licity of
openings for the giftetl and fortunate. In older
countries a great deal of talent has been found
among laboiuing classes ready to assist in Co-ojier-
ative enteri)rises," whereas in America the brightest
and most energetic of the working class find it
comparatively easy to rise into the class of i)eu or
brain workers, and thereby the workmen are, to a
large extent, deiuided of their natm-al leaders. This
remark ajjplies not merely to Co-o])cration, but to
Labour movements generally, and it helps to explain
the ease with wliich the American labourers are led
astray by childish fallacies. Still more significant
is the fact which he menti'ius in another place, that
the class of hantl labourei-s in the United .States is
mainly comjjDsed of foreigners, because native-born
Americans generally rise into higher kinds of work.
Among the skilled artisans there is a fair i)roportiou
of natives, but the ur.skilled are wholly Euroi)ean,
or Canadian, or coloured.
As everyone knows, it is among the foreigners,
and chielly among the tiermans, Poles, Bohemians,
and other Slavs, that .Socialism and .Vnarchism
prevail. The Anarchist jiress is mainly, the more
moderate Socialist press wholly, written in LJermau.
The latter has a rcs])ectable circulation, while the
Anarchist so-called internationalist journals, though
more numerous, seem to reach a very small imblic.
Mr. l^ly guesses roughly that the total innnber of
•' adherents of the general jn-inciples of moderate
and jieaceful Socialism in the United States" may
be half a million: ami, of course, estimates the
Anarchic or Revolutionary jjarty at a far lower
figure. He gives many si)eeimens of the blood-
thirsty out))oin-ings of this faction, antl api>ears to
think that they constitute a real danger to the
State — a\iewwhich will not commend itself to those
who remember the furious wrath evokcil in America
by the Chicago murders, and who gather from
Mr. lily's own i)ages that Anarchism makes, prac-
tically, no converts among native Americans. That
"moilerate Socialism." on the other haml, <ioes
advance, we can \\ell believe; but it seems in
America, as in England, to consist rather in a
sympathetic attitude towards the poor, and a
204
THE SPEAKER.
[August 15, 1891.
cnriositj' in looking out for suggested reforms, than
in any acceptance of specific Socialist schemes.
How Mr. Ely, with his experience of tlie conduct
of public authorities in liis own coiuitry and the
results of ])olitical patronage, can avow himself in
favour of giving the control of railways to the State,
passes our comprehension.
MELANESIA.
The JIelanesians. Their Autliropology and Folklore. By Iv. II.
Codrington. Oxford : Clarendon Press.
Melaxe.si.v is the name given to four groups of
islands in the 'Western Pacific, not far from North
Australia ; and Mr. Codrington's book is an excellent
record of the customs, beliefs, and social institutions
of the islanders. No more valuable or more gentiine
study of man in a very ]irimitive state has recently
api)eared ; for it is founded upon a long and intimate
acquaintance with the people, and it throws light
ujion several ])()ints in anthropology and the evolution
of superstitions toward which attention has latterly
been turned. And while the sociologist will find in
this volume good store of new facts and suggestive
observations, the general reader will be touched by
the charm which belongs to a picture of very simi)le,
unsophisticated manners that are beiugrapidly obliter-
ated. The jiersistent resemblance — one might almost
say, the monotonous identity — that i^revails among
the ideas and practices, religious and social, of man
in an elementary stage all over the world is i-emark-
alily illustrated by this account of the !Melanesiaus.
Exogamy, for exam])le, seems to be almost an abori-
ginal prinei])le of archaic society ; it is the jirimeval
ordinance of prohibited degree that runs in different
versions all over Asia, although no satisfactory ex-
])lanation has yet been given of the invincible repug-
nance among so many races to intermarriage between
persons who are even conventionally kinsfolk. Here,
in remote Melanesia, we find this rule universal. The
people are not divided into tribes, but into two or
more classes that are exogamous, and in which
descent is usually counted only through the mother.
The base-line which unites and divides the gronjjs is
the marriage law, or the inviolable custom which
strictly ijrohibits the intercourse of men and women
Avith others of their own class. Yet, although the
l)ractice is patent, of its cause or origin Melanesia
gives no exjilanation ; the precise germ of utility, the
rude ethical notions which it represents, are still ojjcn
to ingenious conjecture : we cannot tell what has led
savages, with few scruples about sexual promiscuity,
to condemn so rigidly the connection of i)ersous su)!-
posed to be allied, however distantly, in blood.
Although there are no tribes, the Melanesians
have chiefs, who unite sjiiritual with temporal juris-
diction, or. to speak accurately, see no difference
between tlie two things. '"As a matter of fact, the
power of chiefs has hitherto rested ui)on the belief in
their sui)ernatural ])ower derived from thi^ spirits or
ghosts with which they had intercourse." The art of
consultation \vith infiiiential ghosts is be(|ueathed to
a successor, and is indeed the essential attribute of
rulcrship by divine right : but this hereditary rejinta-
tion for ghostly science has, like l*ai)al infallibility,
to be occasionally su))i>orted by a liberal use of the
carnal weapon upon those who (Umbt it. The two
powers, spiritual and temi)oral, evidently support
and interact upon each other ; for while a great
warrior is creilited with magical secrets, the possessor
of charms and amulets is thereby armed with supe-
rior forces ; and, again, a rich man gets the repute of
bi'ing a magician because the multiplication of pigs
and yams can be produced by sorcery. The taboo is
a favourite j)olitieal engine, being used by the chief
to kee]) his own person sacred and unapproachable,
and also to boycott any Melanesian Hampden who
stands out agjiinst exceptional demands by the chief
ii))on his i)roperty. There are a great many secret
societies, at which ghosts are understood to be present
and to hold comuumion with the members, and the
initiation is by wild singing and frantic dancing in
grotesque costtune ; yet although unlicensed peeping
behind the scenes is punished by sudden death, no
one seems to treat these mysteries as nnich more than
fantastic masciuerading. To the earnest European
iiKpiirer. who is always on the look-out for jjrofound
meaning and fai--reaching symbolism in the childish
sports and sujierstitions of wild folk, it is always
difficult and disappointing to realise the fact that
primitive man rarely takes his religion more than
half seriously, and that his queer rites and play-
acting often mean nothing at all. Besides the secx-et
societies, of which ghosts seem to be honorary
members, every village has a kind of social club,
where a system of grades, as in Freemasonry, pre-
vails, and where you can jjurchase your steps up-
ward by money, food, and the idjiquitous ])ig, who
is, however, not always legal tender if he be in-
sufferably tough.
In regard to Melanesian religion Mr. Codrington
tells us much that is very curious and nothing that
is very new ; but his information is valuable just
because we have heard of the same sort of things and
ideas in many other lauds, because the conceptions
and practices of these Pacific islanders resemble so
remarkably A\hat is done and thought by ]jeople in
similar stages of mental development elsewhere.
These coincidences help us to generalise regarding
the primeval superstitious of mankind, and aid us in
tracing what may be called the springs of natural
religion. Hei-e, as in other parts of the uncivilised
world, much confusion has arisen out of the attempts
of Europeans to express vague and rudimentary
fancies or images in the highly condensed language
of organic religion. The words " God " and " Devil."
for instance, as used by an Englishman, have no sense
or fitness in apjilication to the loose, shadowj' notions
of a savage about jihantoms and goblins : and as for
the word " soul," it causes endless confusion. " Many
a voyager," remarks Mr. Codrington. " carries away
as a sort of joke the story that the natives think
their shadows are their souls, who could not tell
exactly what he means by the word soul which he
uses himself."
The ghosts of dead men are universally wor-
shipped, but are to be carefully distinguished, ac-
cording to our author, from the higher spiritual
beings who have never inhabited a human body ;
and both ghosts and spirits haunt places, are present
in trees and stones, where they can be detected by
queer shapes and motions ; are discoverable in the
shajies of snakes, owls, sharks, and other uncanny
animals ; can be propitiated by food offerings, are
accessible to prayer and sacrifice, rule the elements,
deal in plagues and curses ; and, in fact, exercise all
the iiowers and attributes that are everywhere
characteristic of embryonic polytheism before the
divinities become heads of regular ilepartments.
But whereas in the eastern islands the ghost and
the si)irit belong to two distinct classes, not sup-
])osed to be connected by origin, in the Solomon
Islands " the distinction is between ghosts of jiower
and ghosts of no account " ; between those whom
you must ajipease and those from whom nothing
is expected : and to the jjowerful class belong, of
course, the ghosts of formidable men. On the
whole, this book contains very strong but striking
evidence in corroboration, first, of the universality
of ghost worship as one of the earliest forms of
superstition ; and, secondly, of the view that the
notable glio.st is regularly promoted. ui)on his
merits as a wonder-worker, into the lower order of
divinities.
One may observe in this description of Melanesian
beliefs the strange iucajiacity to accept death as the
end of a human being which is at the bottom of the
feeling that peoples the environment with inniuuer-
able ghosts. Death means only that the soul has
de])arted out of the body, that it has become a sprite
or spectre which hangs about the house and the
grave, showing itself by lights or noises, and making
itself ])articularly troublesome if the body has not
August lo, 1891.]
THE SPEAKER.
205
been buried. It may be driven away by shouts or
bull-roarers ; or it may be eoneiliated by t'nnei-al
honours, in which the death meal, or funeral feast,
with a morsel for the ghost, plays, as usual, a eon-
siderable part. Sacrifices arc made on tiie j;rraves ;
and somctiuies the wife is stranj,'lcil or buried alive
that she nuiy follow her husbantl ; for, although the
ghosts wander about incessantly, there is, neverthe-
less, a kind of Lindjo. or place of dei)arted s|)irits, to
which all ghosts are sujiposcil to Journey, and where
l)ad characters are refused admittance.
The discerning leader will by this time have con-
vinced himself that the .Alehuiesians have struck out
no novelties in their religion; ami that its most
remarkable cliaracteristic is its extraordinary resem-
blance, generally aixl in many particulars, to the
ways of worshi)) and s|)iritual fancies struck out at
sundry times and in divers i)laces by the human
imagination working freely aiul independently uiion
the great troubles of life and death. In illustration
of the curious ul)i(iuity of certain particular faljles, it
may be mentioned that we find in Melanesia the
Lamia oi- l)eautiful woman, who tempts incautious
men, and turns intr) a snnke when ))ropci-ly exorcised ;
while the wm-ld-wide jiractice of throwing stones on
a heap l)y the wayside, whicii is known all over Asia
and parts of Kuro))c, with vei>- diverse ex|)Ianati<)ns
or objects, is nnich in vogue in tliese remote islands.
There is .a good sujiply of marvellous myths and
rathei- idiotic stories for the collectors of folklore ;
and altogether Mr. Codrington's book is of real value
to the student of comjiarative religion and sociology.
It is valuable, not only as a copious rejjertory of
authentic jjarticulars liearing on the mental condition
and manners of a sf)ciety. that has grown up naturally
undisturbed by external intercourse, but also because
he haniUes his materials soljerly and judiciously,
without ineconceived theories or attemi)ts to read
deep meanings in the shallow fancies of primitive
brains. The custom of Taboo, for instance, upon
which much ingenious speculation has been recently
exjicnded, is very correctly defined by Mr. Codrington
as a i)rohil)itive rite, with more imi)lied ; it is a well-
known and obvious device for giving supernatural
sanction to an earthly ordinance, for hedging in the
savage king with awfid divinity. Ho shows also,
incidentally, that what Euro])eans call devil-dances,
are often mere rhythmic saltations, with no religious
meaning at all : that grotesque carvings are not
always idols ; and that fantastic games or cere-
monies, which are full of mj'stic symbolism to
the philosophic reader of i)aj)ers before learned
societies, may be mere outbursts of the s])ortive
barbarian, or inventions to satisfy his credulity.
There is nuich to be learnt about ordeals and divina-
tions, which ai-e mainly simple tests or tricks for
detecting culi)rits, recovering lost projjerty, and in-
dicating the ghost or demon who is alllictiiig a rich
man. Magic is. of course, an art in high repute,
being closely allied, as has been always the case,
with some tincture of nattn-al i)hilosophy. esj)ecially
in the direction of jjoisoniiig. In short, the book is
one that adds to our knowledge and throws light in
various directions; and it is well suited for that
large class of readers to whom the ways and whims
of i)riinitive folk are a source of anmsement or in-
struction.
FRANCE AND RUSSIA UNDER THE FIRST
EM PI UK.
.\LEXAXnUF. ]'" ET N'M'Oi.Ki.X :>'Al'liKi LFDIl ('t)l;l!ESrilNI)^NCB
INEDITE. (18)1— lS12j J';ii- Sei;; ■ Tiitiatchc'lT. I'.iris: I.iljiairio
.\cnUcmi(iuo Di. io:-, I'erriu et <■[.■. ISSl.
Tl IK close frieudshij) cxi-ting at the )n-csent time
Ijetween the French and tlie Ru-sian ))eo|iIe is
a matter of grave imi)ortai)ci> to the future (jf Kuiii|)e.
It is nnprofitablo to sjjecuiate on the cau-^es of tliis
friendsliip : it has been asserted that it is liue merely
to the geogra|)hical situation of the two c-ountries:
that it is tlie result of a i)cculiar jittraction iji the
character of the French for the best Slav intellects.
or that it is the creation of far-seeing statesmen of
both nationalities, who have endeavoured to build
up the feeling of friendship into a traditional alliance.
The causes matter not ; the facts remain, that Russia
has learned moi-e of the ai-ts of civilisation from
Fiance than from hci- near neighbouis, ami that
France has always encouraged the asjiirations of
Russia to become a iMuopean i'ower. The history
of the formation and giowlh of the friendship of the
two countries would make a most interesting essay;
it dates from the reign of I'eter the (M-eat, and has
steatlily develojjed to the present time. Inli-ll(?ctually
it has had great residts; the Empress Catherine
ai)preciated the labours of the i"'rench encyclo))a'dist.s
and i)ensioned Diderot in the most graceful manner
by i)urchasing his library, and then making him its
])aid custodian ; she was in constant comnuinication
with the leailers of French thought, and develoi)ed
their influence on the budding literature of Russia;
while in modern days l''iance has repaid the debt by
interpreting and tran>^lating to Ivu-oije the works of
the great Kussians. who are at ))i-esent exercising
such i)rofound influence on Euroi)ean thought. Foli-
tically the alliance has a long and striking history ;
both countries strove against Frederick the (ireat in
the Seven Years' War, but while Rossl)ach has been
followed by .Jena and .Sedan, the I'mssians have
never revenged their defeat at Ziirndorf. This jjoli-
tical alliance has been interrupted by four imijortaut
wars, those of IT'.W-!)!). lSOO-07, ISl'i-i:^, and lS.-)l-5(i,
but while the campaigns of Suvarof in Italy and
Switzerland, the liattles of Austerlit/. and Friedland,
and the Crimean war exercised no a))i)reciable iidlu-
ence on the history of the two nations, the war of
1S12, with its invasion of Russia, its burning of Mos-
cow, and the disastrous retreat of the Grand Army,
ranks among the most important events in the modern
history of Euroi)e.
Tolstoi, the great Russian Miiter, has grasjied
alike the imjiortance and the dramatic features of
this great struggle in his prose ejjic " ^\'ar and
Peace;" he iniderstood its significance, and recog-
nised that while the resistance of Russia to the in-
vader was national, the attitude of the French
soliliers was inirely military. The camjjaign of 1S12
showed an artuy fighting a nation with the inevitable
result that the latter was victorious. Beyond this,
there exists a jjcrsonal interest in the great war. The
French peo))le had no desire to tight Russia, nor hatl
the French ai-niy ; it was in no respect necessary for
the ijrosperity of France that Russia should he con-
quered and defeated. The war was the work of one
man, Xajiolcon, and tlie repulse he met with was a
sign that his star was setting, and that the days of
his sujiremacy were numbered. The history of the
events which led to the war is therefore bound uj)
in the story of the personal connection of Napoleon
with Alexander I.. ('/.:ir of Russia, and is of the
greatest interest and importance.
This history M. .Serge TatistchefF has given in his
bulky volume. It may be said at once that the letters
of the C/.ar .\lexander. which he has discovered in
the archives at St. Petersburg, throw no new light
of any imi)ortance on the relations between the C/.ar
and Naixilcon ; it is the well-written history in which
they are embedded, and the careful and im))artial
analysis of the despatches of the successive French
ambassadors at the Hussian Court, which give his
book a |)ermanent value. On the accession of the
Czar Alexander after the assassination of the C'.ar
Paul, the young ruler found himself the only admirer
of France and of the l'"irst Consul at his Court. This
admiration had been iiis|)ired into his mind liy his
tutor, the Swi-s ijublici^t L:i Harpe. and he expressed
it freely to Duroc. the first envoy sent by Napoleon
to St. Petersburg. ".lai toujours desire." lie said to
Duroc, "lie voir la France et la Russie unies. Ce sont
deux nations grandes et ]iuissantes fpie se sont donnes
ri'-cipro(|uement ties i)reuves d'estinie, et (pii doivent
s'entendre jiour faire cesser les i)etites divi-ions du
continent le desirerais beaucou|i m"entendre
dircctement a\ec le Premier Consul, dont le earactere
20G
THE SPEAKER.
[August 15, 1891.
loyal m'est bien (!onnn et sans passer par taut <1 inter-
ni(-diaiies toujojus dangereux." But hi-; aaiuiration
was not shared by his mother, by his oouiisellor.s, or
by the nobles of St. Petersburg, as Caulamcourt, the
first accredited ambassador of Napoleon, soon dis-
covered, and under their influence Russia took part
in the campaign of Ansterlit/., and after peace had
been made between France and Austria, waged war
alone in the campaign, which was terminated by the
battle of Friedland. Then came the dramatic episode
of the interview between the CV.ar and Napoleon on
the River Niemen. M. Tatistcheff gives full promi-
nence to this striking event, and describes, from the
narratives of eye-witnesses, the uniforms worn by
the two monarchs and the anxiety of the King of
Prussia the fate of whose kingdom was under discus-
sion as he rode up and down ujion the bank, and
even forced his horse in to the water in his longing
to hear what was being said. The grandiose ideas of
Napoleon, his schemes tor the ruin of England antl
the division of the civilised world between two Em-
pires of the East and the West, the glamour of the
fame of the great conqueror, and the fascination of
his manner, all influenced the Czar, who was young
and suscejitible ; and he returned to his capital after
signing treaties of peace and alliance with Napoleon
at Tilsit, with his former feelings of admiration for
the Emperor of the French multiiilied a thousand
fold. Napoleon was perfectly well aware of the Czar's
feelings, but he did not reciprocate them, and ho
deliberately prepared to take advantage of the en-
thusiasm of Alexander for himself. He was to receive
everything and to give nothing, and for a time this
policy, assisted by the sagacity of Caulaiucourt, the
French ambassador at St. Petersburg, was completely
justified. But the Czar Alexander was not devoid of
natural shrewdness : he began to distrust the jirofes-
sions of his illustrious friend, and his suspicions were
further deepened by Talleyrand during the confer-
ences at Erfurt, as the wily diplomatist acknowledges
in the rMi Part of his recently iiublished Memoirs.
The feeling of distrust having once taken the place
of that of affectionate admiration, the personal
friendship between the two monarchs grew less and
less. Napoleon did not recognise this fact immedi-
ately, but the refusal of Alexander to give hiin the
hand of a Russian princess to take the place of Jose-
phine opened his eyes, and from that time his policy
directly tended to war with Russia. That war com-
menced with the invasion of 1.S12, and did not cease
iintil the allies occupied Paris, and \ai)oleon was
forced to abdicate.
From this sketch it will be seen that the story of
the personal i-elations between Napoleon and the
Czar Alexander I. is of surpassing importance to the
history of Eurojie. It is this story which M. Serge
TatistchelT has endeavoured to tell. As has been
said, his researches have not added much that is new
to the main features in the hitherto uniiublished
letters, but ho has taken the opportunity of his dis-
coveries to com]iile a volume of real interest, which
cannot for the future be neglected by any stu. Cut
of the history of Europe during the era marked by
the victories of Napoleon.
LADY WILDE'S ESSAYS.
Notes on Me.v, Women, and I'.ooks. By Lady WiUc. I.omlon :
Wiird & Bowney. IS'Jl-
Lady Wildk sweeps over a very wide range of
subject indeed, whether we look upon it from a
geogra])liical, a literary, or a i.olitieal standi.oint.
She travels over Germany, Siiain. Fiance. Kiigland,
and Irehuul, dcscen.ling in the literary scale from
.Jean Paul and Caldeion to Miss Jlartiiieau and Lady
Blessingtou, and politicailv diversifying her i)ages
with notices of Daniel OConnell. Dr. Doyle, and
Disraeli. No doubt she touches nothing she does
not adorn, but a hypercritical person might feel
inclined to think she over-adorns not a few things.
Here, for instance, is a passage, the rhetoric of
which will be found, we fear, by most people a trifle
excessive : —
"Hi« [O'Connell's] moral-force agitation was a mighty oce-in
pcrpotuallv heavinf.- and di.shing, and making fresh inroads upon the
tixed roiks of prcjuilice and bigotry, whirhug into its vortex what-
ever stiit.ly vessel or tinv craft of a Measure was put forth bv
Ministers, Absorbing its ric'hes and then casting iiack the dismantled
iiulk to the despairing launchers. He knew that Insh independencvo
could never he achieved bv epileptic fits of mad ferocity, and through
his consummate leadership he gained all for which he combated
'without Ihe slain of a single crime resting on the national
cause.* ''
However, when all is said, the chief fault to be
found with this imblication is that much of it which
is interesting and intelligent in itself is scarcely
needed in a very much over-booked and very busy
age. Lady Wilde has certainly nothing to say about
Richter which was not said some sixty years ago by
Carlyle, and even her more elaborate treatment of
Calderon will scarcely be needed by readers of Trench,
McCarthy, Fitzgerald, and others. Still, to readers
who approach these great writers for the first time
Lady Wilde's essays will be found valuable, and
especially that part of them devoted to an analysis
of some of their works, particularly some of the plays
of Calderon. Lady Wilde deals mostly with very
big people, but we think she succeeds best with the
few comparatively small people she condescends to
include in her wide survey of "Men, Women, and
Books." We have all heard so much about these big
people before, and by all sorts of jieople, big and
little, that it is no doubt hard to please us in any-
thing said about them. Then tastes differ so widely.
The present writer, for instance, thinks very much
better of George Eliot than Lady Wilde does,
and very much worse of the late Lord Lyttou.
We have many poets included in these notices, as
is natural, seeing that our author is herself a
poet, and have little faidt to find with most of
^vhat is here said about them, save that so
much of it has been said over and over again before.
Of Wordsworth and Tennyson, for instance, where
can we expect to find any fresh or new " apprecia-
tion" or " impression ':'" Leigh Hunt, undoubted poet
as he is. might jierhaps be considered the smallest
mentioned in this volume, and seems to us to be the
most satisfactorily handled. Lady Wilde has not
so much to say, save incidentally, about women as
the title of her book would lead one to imagine. Her
biggest woman (George Eliot) meets, as we think,
with but very imperfect appreciation, whereas her
smallest, and the most inconsiderable person in the
whole book (Lady Blessingtou), forms the subject of
the longest and, in our opinion, the most valuable
of these essays. Lady Wilde does not overrate Lady
Blessingtou intellectually, morally, or otherwise, but
she gives us a very vivid jiicture of the early and
later life—mostly a very worthless, though interest-
ing one— of this once well-known, but now nearly
forgotten. L'isli adventuress and beauty.
We do not wish it to be thought, from what may
be held, esiiecially by the softer sex, to be the some-
what cariiing and ixVssibly ungracious spirit of some
of our criticism, that we do not think well of most
of these essays. We simply think they need not
have been reprinted : in other words, we fail to see
the raison d'etre of the book. We might, however,
say the .same of nine-tenths of all the books printed
every year, and of jierhaps nineteen-twentietlis of all
the books of criticism. Why does not Lady Wilde
give us more Irish fairy and folk stories? She is
strongest on the side of the imagination. She might
leave criticism to her highly critical anti-Philistine
son, the prophet of the for nu- anil the scoruer of the
fact.
VICTORIAN POETS.
Vktokian Tor-T;
By .Amy Shari'C, Newnbain (Ullage, Cambrilge.
London :'Methuen & Co. 1891.
This volume is one of a " I^niversity Extension
Series," which Messrs. Methueu i^- Co. describe as
"suitable for extension students and home-reading
circles." W^e have, with our own eyes, seen that
August 15, 1891.]
THE SPEAKER.
20;
strangely nanicf! crcatiu'c, an "extension student";
but a " home-reading cireie" we had always imagined
to be, like tlie mori' familiar eirele of geometry, an
imaginary eonstruetion, useful for pur|)oses of i)ure
ratioeinatioM, l)ut ni'ver eneouiitered in actual life.
There is little doubt, however, that, did such a eii-cle
exist, some point in its eireumferenee would stand
uj) on the family hearth and assei't its honest belief
that Sir Ivlwin Arnold was a greater jjoet than
Hobert drowning. And there is less doubt that
sufh an assertion — however heartfelt — should be at
oneo scolTed at. The ordinary family, however,
niight find some diflieidty in sconiiig intelligently.
It is to meet this erying want that .Miss Sharjx'
recommends twenty-nine books of criticism and
reference to bo read side by side with the eight
most considerable Victorian poets, and herself adds
a thirtieth.
And, indeed, if we assume the existence r)f this
figure, " the home circle," there is little fault to be
found with .Miss Sharjie's book. She is, as her
name denotes, of the same sex as Elizabeth Uarrett
Browning, and may be jiardoned for allotting a
separate essay to that jioetess, while t'lough and
Matthew Arnold are lum])ed together in the
following chapter, and Rossetti, William Morris and
Swinburne in the next. As mere men, on the other
hand, we may be forgiven for holding that either
Cloiigh or Arnold, whether we consider their per-
formance or their intluence, eould give Mrs. Browning
fifty points in a hundred and beat her with ease.
But the contention is unimportant, and the census
teaches us to allow for a preponderance of females
in the family cireie. Let us note also — without com-
jilaint^the feminine note in Miss Sharjie's criticism
of Mr. Swinburne. The battle over the " ballads
beautiful" — as "Slv. Whistler calls them "was
fought out on the ground of Morals versus Art;
Swinburne's position might perhaps have been
turned more effectively and not less truly v.ith the
contention that as the artistic ideal vuist include
meaning as well as form, to emphasise and cover with
a glory of noble language ugly facts or ideas essen-
tially degraded is to set up an ideal as false
artistically as it may be hurtful ethically. How-
ever, without recanting anything. Mr. Swinburne's
later Axorks have been cleared of the elements which
made his earlier jioems offensive; and there the con-
troversy may well rest." But Miss Sharjie hardly
lets it rest. Her sense of iirojiriety colours the
whole of her estimate of this i)oet: and her essay
perhaps would better have been shortened to this —
"Chapter V. Swiniu-hxe. There are no snakes in
the home-circle." It may be added that the whole
of this fifth chapter is curiously unsympathetic.
Tennyson is known to Miss Sharpe, and Browning —
•• Tlierf's ii JIE Sooitty down at Cimliridgc- "
— as J. K. S. sings; and ( 'lough and Matthew Arnold
are usually understood, in a measure, by all who
reside near University towns. But this same con-
tiguity with a seminary of polite learning is just as
sure to blunt the ajipreciation of Rossetti, -Morris
and Swinburne —widely as these three poets differ.
Rossetti, especially, is no writer for academies. b\it for
artists; and the obtuseness of .Miss Shari>e's remarks
ujion him is only astonishing at first. AVc make
haste to assert that she tells the home-reading circle
quite as much as is good for it.
The method adopted in the tliree most imi)orlant
essays — those on Tennyson and Mr. and Jlrs. Brown-
ing— is that of illustrating each critical obser\ atiou
with cojiious illustrations from the works of the
writer under review. And, for .Miss Shariic's])uriJose,
there is no doubt that this is the right method. Her
exposition of the merits of tliese three jwots is
capable and lucid — so far as it goes. But to an
embracing survey of their work, with its aims, con-
scious and unconscious, anil its effects, she has not
attained. Perhajjs it was no part of her plan. If,
however, we allow the usefulness of her narrower
scope, we still liud ourselves demanding something
moi<- than slic- tells iis, not only ol Kussctti, .Morris
and Swinburne, but of Cjough an<l ArnoM. With
something that we lie-itate to call perversity, though
we teel it as i)erversc, slic misses the iiecidiar charm
of the " BotliJe," of "Thyrsis" and "the Scholar
(iipsy." anil the Ilomerir majesty of "Balder Dea.l"
and ".SoJiiaband Hu-tum." To lier " Bahler " a|.pears
" somehow wanting in force" and the narrative in
" Solirab and Hustum " "hardly seems swift enougli,
l)assionate enough, to make an event so tragic as the
death of a warrior-son by the hand of his unwilling
warrior-fatherquite so imj)ressive as it ought to be."
In truth this is just how it would strike a home-
reading circle the sort of folk who dote on Mr.
I'ildes' "The Doctor"— and we can almost see
Arnold's smileatthe comi)laint— " (iive us something
passionate, i)lease. And don't let it deal with Hasti-
ness, like theijassionof Swinburne: but, if you itlease,
stir uj) our soids with just tlu; good old domestic
emotion we want. We know what we like: we want
you to be as ])ure as ever you were, but kindly reek
with i)assioii." The young men and women who
ext<'nd themselves as students, and form circles for
nuitual instruction, are after all of the same bhjod as
their giandi)arents who read Byron to each other
and sang songs of sea-rovers and jiining oriental
beauties: and this is an admirable book for then).
It will wean them, without i-iideness, from their
natural favourites. It tells them exactly what
is admired in academic, as opposed to home-reading,
circles: and so leads them, gently, towards good
taste.
ENGRA\ED GEM.S.
Tin: Kn(ihavkI) (Ikms of Clas-^icai, Times, with ;i Catalogue of the
Gems ill the Fitzwilliain Museum. lly ,1. Henry MiJdleton,
Sladc Professor of l-'iiie .Vit, etc. t'umbndi;i- : Al Ilie fiiiviitity
Press. ISill.
While everyone is aware of the singidar interest
attached to engra\cd gcm>., lew writers have veu-
turetl during the last half century on any comi)re-
hensive discussion of this dillicidt subject. lu
England, with the excejjtion of .Mr. A. S. .Murray's
short introduction to the Catalogue of Gems in the
British Museum, there is little e.\ce])t the works of
the late .Mr. C. W. King, to whose memory the book
here Tintler review is de<iicated. .Mr. King's writings
areadmirable in many ways, but they are rather those
of an aci-onq)lished scholar who delightetl in gems for
the side lights that they throw on the classics, than
of an arcliH'ologist of the modern school, whose first
object is to trace out the history of gem-engraving
itself. Jloreover several classes oi' gems which were
hardly known when the failure of his eyes |tui an
end to -Mr. King's work, have since become im])ortant.
On the Continent, by the general consent of arclue-
ologists, the subject has been left almost entirely to
the few ])ersc)ns who have the actual handling of the
])ublic collections, and St. Petersburg, Berlin, and
Paris have each had two representatives in the dis-
cussion. These si.x, however, w ith one or two others,
lia\e i)referred to focus great learning on particular
parts of the subject, rather than to write general
text-books. Hence it comes about that in ))ul)li~hing
an account of the engraved gems of ehis^ical tin)cs.
Professor .Middleton enters a field \\ Inch is almo'^t
inioccu)>ied.
Tli(M)ook is st:itfd to be " a brief account of the
engraved gems anil other forms of .-ignet which were
used by the chief classical races of ancient times,"
and is intended for the general use of students of
archa-ology. ,\n illustrated catalogue of the small
but interesting collection in the Pit/.wiHiam Mu-euni.
which was chiefiy made by Colonel Leake, is adikd
as an ajipendix.
Professor .Middleton begins, as is ine\i table, with
the two earliest forms of gems the Eg.\ plian
searaba'us and the Habylonian cylinder-and quotes
a few exam))les <if each. The hi>tory of the
scarab.cus, and of its otTsjn'ing. the M-araba-oid,
is duly traced, through Phteuicia to Etnuia and
208
THE SPEAKER.
[August 15, 189].
Greece ; but the story of the engraved cylinder, a-s
told by Professor Middleton, stops short with the
PhuL'nicians. It is true that there is little more to
be told, as cxaniiiles of Greek cylinders are very
rare. The reader, liowever, naturally asks whether
any reason can be K'^'^n for the neglect of the
cylinder form by Greeks and Etruscans, exce))t for
the special iiurpose of iini)ressing a recurrent design
on pottery"/ — and to this question no answer is sug-
gested.
The account of the cylinder and the scarab is
followed by a description of the strange but uncouth
signets of the " Hittites," and by an account of the
"gems of the Greek Islands." Here, again, the
reader will complain that the author is too brief.
The so-called " gems of the Islands " are a strongly
marked class of stones, distinguished by their style
and by their characteristic shai)es. They are found
in the islands of the -Egean (whence their name),
but also on most of the adjoining coasts. Their
interest lies in the fact that they are found botli
witli dei)osits of the Myceu;ean j)eriod and also with
later Greek works. All this is stated by Professor
Middleton. But questions at once arise which are
of interest to all students of history, and not only
to archa-ologists. "What was this school of artists,
able to bridge by a continuous tradition the dark
gulf that separates Myceu;e from later Greece V Were
they seated at a distance — say, in Crete? Were
they craftsmen so humble that the storms of the
Dorian Invasion passed over their heads V Is the
whole Myceuiean culture subsequent to the Dorian
Invasion ? — if, indeed, that invasion ever took place.
Such ai-e some of the solutions tliat have been pro-
])osed. Professor Middleton does not clearly indicate
his owu o])inion. but we gather that he would incline
to the second of the alternatives given above.
After an account of the Greek gems of the finest
period, which would Ije more serviceable if it wei-e
more fully ilhistrated. Professor Middleton turns to
Etruria. In his treatment of scarabs found in
Etruscan tombs he differs somewhat from his pre-
decessors, in holding that a considerable portion of
the earlier and better specimens are of Greek origin.
Here, too, he might well have defined and sujjported
his jjosition rather more fully. It apjiears to us that
the differences between the fine gems found in Greece
and those of Etruria are so marked that the idea
of an extensive import trade is excluded, unless w'e
suppose that thei* was a great manufacture in
Greece of gems expressly designed for tlie Etruscan
market, and of this there is no evidence.
In the study of gems some knowledge of the
technical methods of engraving is a valuable aid
in determining doubtful questions of date and
authenticity. In this part of thes ubject Professor
Middleton is seen at his best. With Ids inirivalled
knowledge of curious manual processes, he is able to
(piote the methods of the Indian tribesman, the
dentist, the glazier, and the gem-forger — one of
tlie latter class was once obliging enough to disi)lay
the whole of his art. But on questions of techni(iue,
as on all otliers connected with gems, there is room
for dilTerences of o])inion ; and we doubt wlietlier
I'rofessor Middleton can jn-ove the use of the wheel
on the "gems of tlie Greek Islands."
A considerable part of the book is devoted to a
discussion of gems with su)5iiose<l artists' signatures.
These form at once tlie most jierplexing and tiie
most irritating of archaeological juoljlems ; the most
perplexing because certainty is usually unattainable,
.•uid the most irritating because the whole difficulty
is due to the folly of our ancestors. Nevertheless,
the histoiy of the signed gems is a curious study.
Two or three specimens were extant all through
the middle ages. Between the si.xteenth and llie
eigliteenth centuries, the number of known gems
with artists" signatures slowly increased, and the
gems so signed began to Ije objects of special value.
In the eighteenth century a royal Prince became an
amateur of gems, anil jjrojiounded a theory as to one
Solon, a gem-engraver. .Soon after Baron Stosch
published his book on signed gems, and every man
of taste became a collector. For more than a century
the sui)j)ly of signed gems was fully equal to the
demand, and the catalogues of ancient engravers
were swelled to a prodigious size. At length the
bubble burst some sixty years since, and it only
lemained for archa-ologists laboriously to pick out
tlie true signed gems from the accumulated rubbish.
Most of the writers alluded to at the beginning of
this article liave devoted themselves to the inquiry,
but the uncertainty of their conclusions is sufficiently
shown by their variety. Meanwhile, it fortunately
happens that new gems are from time to time dis-
covered which are above sus])icion, and stir up no
controversy. The Fitzwilliam JIuseum possesses one
such gem, a work of the admirable artist Dexamenos.
The chapters on which we have not touched
treat of various Ijranches of the subject, such as
the history of the cameo, the uses of gems in anti-
([uity, and the manufacture of glass pastes. There
is also an interesting section on the use of gems as
signets anil ecclesiastical ornaments in the middle
ages. As we have already said, the main fault
that i;ve find in a book in other ways excellent is
the venial one of being too short, and it may be
hoped that its apjiearance will be of real service in
promoting a renewed study of gems in England.
Thei'e are a few misprints and other inaccuracies,
such as are almost unavoidable in a book dealing
with a mass of details. We note, for example, that
Professor Middleton speaks in the present tense of
a very remarkable cup of carved glass in the Museum
at .Strasburg. Tnless we are wrongly informed, this
cuji perished, with much else that was hardly less
fragile, in the summer of 1870.
SHILLING FICTION.
1. The Diary or a Scoindkel : Being t'ne I'ps and Downs of a Man
about Town. Bv Slax Pemberton. London : Ward & Downey.
1891.
2. Ji'sTiNE : OR, A Woman"3 Hosorit. By AValter C'alvort. London:
Eden, Remington & Co. 1891.
3. DiTiFUL Davohteks : a Tale of London Life. By H. SutherlunJ
Edwards. London : Eden, Remington & Co. 1890.
4. Betweem the Lines. By Walter llorries Pollock and Alexander
Gait. London : Methuen & Co. 1891.
•3. Bits i-kom Bi.inkhonny ; or, Bell o" the Manse. By John
.Strathesk. Edinburgh and London : Olijihant. Anderson &
Ferrier. 1891.
" The Diary of a Scoundrel "' is, of course, the diary
of a man with redeeming traits in liis ch.aracter ;
and the goodness of bad peojile is more in.pressive —
in some cases more attractive — than the goodness of
the evenly virtuous. It was this, perhajis, which
won the sympathy of the reader for tlie heroine of
"As in a Looking Glass," and made that story so
popular. In tliis book the scoundrel was not so
much of a scoundrel as the world supposed him to
be. But for the world's bad oiiinion he had himself
chiefiy to thank. His wife obtained a ilivorce from
him with a facility that seems a little unusual, when
he could very easily have jiroved to her that she had
no reason whatever to susi)ect him. He had squan-
dered her money, but he had done nothing worse.
However, he was too proud to give any explanation.
" Wliy trouble." he says, •• why seek to convince a
woman wlio shows a desire to lie rid of you"?" The
story contains plcnt}'' of striking contrasts ; it deals
with the low morality of high life, the virtues of a
scoundrel, the change from ric-hes to poverty. It is
by no means without interest : and a rich American,
of tlie kind most common in fiction, provides the
rescue of the hero and the hapjiy ending. In short,
it is much the kind of book that the ]iublic have
shown that they like to read. To more critical
reailers it will seem a little over-coloured and un-
natural ; much of it is rather story-like than life-
like.
On the cover of "Justine"' is the jiicture of a
young man in an easy-chair, gazing pleasantly at a
skeleton standing erect in a cabinet. This looks
August 15, 1891.]
THE SPEAKER.
209
])r(>iiiisiiiff. The opeiiinp fhajiliT helps to raise one's
aiiticiiiatioiis. There is so iimch ])reliiiiiiiary fuss
that <me really exi)ects soiiu'tliiuf? more tliau the
eoiiiinoiiplaee iminier story. .Viul yet we liiid in it
only tiie old, iamiliar lines. A man is found mur-
dered. It is believed l)y the detective that a ei'rtain
Avonian eonniutted tlie minder. We kno\v that the
detective must be wrong, because the hero is in love
with that woman ; and this alone is, to a habitual
reader of fiction, sufficient evidence of her innocence.
In the enit the real murderess confesses her guilt. This
isnot a very ingenious story. It isuot well constructed ;
it contains much material which seems unnecessary
to the story and not illustrative of the characters;
in other places the book sulTcrs from undue com-
jiression. We notice here, as in some other recent
volumes, a slight alteration in the detective. Tlie
fashion has cliangcd, and the detectives of fiction
are, it seems, to fail this winter : they will be l)eauti-
fuUy foiled and turned back so as to sliow the
superior cunning of the hero. They W'ill, however,
be quite as dull as they were in the spring. There
is just that amoiuit of love-story in "Justiue" which
one generally finds in detective stories, to provide
relief when one is overwrought with the mystery
and bloodshed, and to furnish motives for the com-
mitting of a murder and for the hero's interest in
the detection of guilt. On the whole, ".lustine" is
rather a poor si)ecimen of rather a i)Oor kind of
story.
In "Dutiful Daughters" Mr. Sutherland Edwards
has a subject which has already been treated with
some success by Shakcsi)eare, Miss Wilkins,and others.
The title is, of course, ironical. The two married
daughters of Mr. Meeking were very far from being
dutiful. Owing to circumstances which need not Ije
detailed here, Mr. Meeking found himself entirely
dependent on his two daughters ; it was ai-ranged
that he should spend six months of the year with
each of them. But the one turned him out a day or
two before the right time, antl the other refused to
take him in until the very day on which he was due.
Consecpiently we find Mr. Meeking at the commence-
ment of the story in Kensington Workliouse. Mr.
Meeking regains his old i)osition in the end. and his
undutiful daughters and sons-in-law are generally
confounded. It is a clever little story, written with
brightness and humour; much of it is wildly im-
in'obal)le and farcical, but it is well told and dis-
tinctly annising.
" Between the Lines " is a murder story, ratlier
more original and ingenious than the average murtler
story. The missing document, the rightful heir, and
the disguised villain are part of the subject of the
book, but they do not constitute its chief claim to
originality. The impulsive act by which Mr. Xtin
Rhyn tries to screen tlie character of his murdered
friend, and the comi)lieations which ensue from
that, are well invented, however. Mr. Van Rhyn,
we are told, occupied the same set of rooms at the
Langham Hotel which had been formerly oc(Ui)ied
by that "•well-known American millionaire, Mr.
Gilead P. Beck." As a com])linient to ^Ir. Besant
this kind of thing may be all that is delicate and
admirable, but it does not make this story more
convincing; it may perhai)s help to make "The
Golden Butterfly " more convincing, which is not
at all necessary. It is really a mistake to remind
the reader that the story is only a story and not
real life ; he is so likely always to remember that
for himself. The obitujiry notice of M. Ferdinand
Montluc on the last iiage is a capital imitation of
the i)ersonal i)aragra])hs of certain newsj)apers. The
tone of the writing is somewhat cynical — humoiw-
ously cynical. " Between the Lines " is (luite a read-
able story.
Many will welcome, the new edition of "Bits
from Blinkboiniy." There is a pleasant homeliness
and simplicity about this series of pictures of
Scottish village life. They have a character and
quality of their own, and are quite free from the
common fault of pretentiousness.
TWO HOOK GUIDES.
A GVUIE TO THE llllOIi E O) riOOKS I-
I{KAi.i;ns. Editid l,y .\itl,ur H. JJ. .\
olUulh.il Colle«c, ((xioril. Loudou : i
■ ■ • -.'TS AKI> GenEBAI,
H'.jiiorarv Fellow
niford. IH'J\.
A (irii.E Hook to Books, r.dil.-l bv K. is. hargant aiid Bcniard
\\ lii.'.liaw. Loudon : Hfiiry Knjwdc. ItS'Jl.
The imllMir nf tlu' ti-i-Hli-.' firnt named in our luiidiiig cauilidly
tells us in his prefac- tli.it it \h not intended fortlinse •• fcrtnnate
lic-isonsin an cnvialile iio«iti..ii. more fortunate and more envied
llian they often know," who liave oomi>etent ndviserM at liaud
who ean tell them *• wli.it to road." T)ie aim of Die hook is to
he useful "to the eomniitleis of the smaller Free Lihrarieo, to
the Edueational Deparlinents of Working Men's CooiK-rative
mill otlier Societies, to some of those who are attending University
Extension I.eetnres, to Home R<-adiug Cirehs and Mutual Iin-
lirovenieiit Soeieties, and also to a good inunv isolated (-tuilents
engaged in fiVorts to ediieate themselves." lliat it will he u-ieful
in this way wo liave no d..iihl. and there is also a good deal of
useful adviee and jileasant literary matter intersju-rsed through
its iiages. Geohigy must he studied eliiefly in the ojien air.
Under the liead of " Pliilosojihy " the student'is advised to follow
two rules, tlie ehief jioiiits of w'hieii are 1 to eheek his reading
by his own experienee of men and things, and i Ji to read the
liliihisojiheis themselves and not to he eoiitent with reading about
]i]iilo.soi)hy. Tlie (luotatioiis under the various headings are
also good and well chosen. Thus, under " Politiejil S<-ience,"
we liave a iiuotntiou from Bagehot ending with — "If eonstitu-
encii's knew move. iiieinber< would have to know more, and the
standard of intelligence of the House of Commons would he
raised." Under this heading, however, we mav note that we
were somewhat surprised to see "The Student's Blaekstone"
reeouimcuded as an ik/ciuicciI book on the English Con.stitution.
The second book named in the heading of this article is
written on (piiti a difl'erent ]ilan. In it the various subjeets
considered are arranged alpliabetieally. The object of the work,
as stated in the preface, is " to place at the service of the reader
tlie opinions of those who may be trusted t-> give sound advice
as to the books which arc of valne in each department of know-
ledge." The word " knowledgo " is iiswl in a widi- sense, as it
includes in its scope the "science" of self-defence, for boxing
tigmes ill the list of subjeets on which treatises are recommended.
Billiards, cricket, cycling, fencing, football, and golf, with a
variety of similar subjects, have sjiace allotted to them in these
pages. From "Abyssinia" to "Zoology." the eye ranges ov<r
some l!ot) main subjects of the most varied character, with verv
nuiiieroiis sub-heads, which we are invited to study in standard
treatises. History. Science, .\rt. Law, Literature, and Tlieologv
find a jilacp. There would seem, indeed, to be scarcely any topic
of interest in which the reader is not referred to a copious list of
aiitliorities. One subject aloue, which is. we think, (le.serving of
attention, seems to have escaped notice. A library, in order to
lie at all complete, ought to have copies of the best speeches of
the princijial orators of ancient and modern times. Demosthenes
and Cicero find a place under Greek and Latin, and Burke
under England in the sul -head. Literature; but we have looked
ill vain for Gladstone. Bright, and other names of first-rate im-
]iortaiice in the ranks of orators. To us the work appears to err
rather on the side of reduuilaney ; but we have little doubt that
a good many readers will find it very serviceable.
RTCAEDO FOR THE PEOPLE.
PKixcin.ES or 1'oliticai, Economy and T-vxatiox. By David Ric-irdo.
Edited, with iutrodiutory Essiiy, Notes, and .\i>]ieiiiiice*, by E. C. K.
Gomier, M.A. London: George Bell A: Sous. IS'.'l. (Bohu's
.Series .)
The publishers of Bolin's scries deserve the gratitude of all
students of political economy for Mr. Conner's neat edition of
the chief work of the best abused and least studied of the great
masters of the science. The editor is a young Oxford man,
alreadv favourably known a.-: a University Extension lecturer
and writer on the subject in the latter ea)mcity. if we mistake
not, on both sides of the Atlantic. He contributes an introduc-
tion and appendices, the unprelentiousness of which rather
obscures their real utility, dealing with the st.'ck criticisms on
Ricardo and in Apiieiulix .Vi more particularly with those of
Jevoiis and Professor InL'rnm.aiid the savage per>iUialities of the
great Geriiian " inductive" economist, Adolf Held. He also
brings out Ricardo's uumethodical habit of mind — character-
istic, bv the way, of the English business man— sketches a
rearrangement of'the < tints in a more logical onler, -suece.ss-
fullv disconnects Ricanh. from the Soeiali-t tlieories of the
relation of value and labour that have so often been fathered
upon him, explains vi'ry clearly the position of the theory i^f
rent in his svsteiii, and exhibits a wide knowledire of economic
liteiatiire that was. till recently, far too nire amoUi.' English
econniuists. There are u'ood notes scattered thnnigh the book
and an excellent bibliography. We believe this is the first cheap
edition of Ricardo's works. The pn'si nt dress of the series is a
great iniprovemeiit on the familiar covers wliose repntatiou is
somewhat soiled in many miuds— such is the effect of earl)"
a.ssoeiation— by their suggestions of cribbing tit school.
210
THE SPEAKER.
[August 15, 1891.
FIRST IMPRESSIONS.*
Prefaced by a lucagre aud uiisiitisfactory biojiTapliical and
critical introduction, a new and clicai) edition of '• The Poetical
Works of John Greculiaf Whit tier " Jias just licen broufrht out
by Messrs. Frederick Warue A Co. Whitlior is always welcome,
thoujjh, as these pages Ihenisclves bear witness, the" gentle aud
attractive Quaker-poet of Amcsbury is not always inspired —
except by the motive to do good. "Soniotinuis his muse is be-
trayed into anything but rhylliniic motion, yet never, in the
moral sense, into one nnworth'y line. The lyrics aud idylls of
New England life whicli Wlnttier has writ'teu. often approach
in their artless beauty tlie \L'yy perfection of art, whilst his
anti-slavery ]H>ems, with their noble enthusiasm of humanity,
aud passionate protest against injustice, quicken the pulse like
the sound of a trumpet, and shame meaner natures witli their
lofty views of brotherhocd. In the jwetic interpretation of
nature. Whittier has won for himself not a great, but an
honoured place ; and wherever the sanctity of the home is most
valued, his jjoems. with their rich human love and tenderness,
will always Hud .-i place. It has been finely said of him that,
belonging by auce.-^try ami conviction to a religious body making
much of the - inner liglit " of God in the heart, Whittier has, bv
his free and natural songs, made freedom a duty and religion a
joy. Whittier li.is written too much, but mucli may be foi^iveu
to a man who has always written from his heart, and who has
ever used his gift of song to <|uickeu faith, to kindle hope, and
to keep alive charity in the hearts of meu.
Dr. Norraau Macleod's racy, genial, and vigorous sketches
and stories of Scottish life aud cliavacter arc not nearly so well
known as they deserve to be by the jiresent generation. We
are therefore glad to welcome, in" a neat volume published at a
popular price, - The Old Lieutenaut and His Son," " Character
Sketches," and other " Remiuiseeuces of a Highland Parish."
Norman Macleod held in Scotland, as preacher and man of
letters, for a long term of busy and iutineutial vears. a positiou
wjiich was ncit imlike. iu mauy respects, that" which Charles
Kingsley filled so admirably iu England. Both men possessed
to a marked degree the power of personal fascination ; both had
the courage of tlieir convictions, aud both were cheery optimists
though never flatterers, of their kind.
Evidently Mr. Arnold Wliite believes himself (o be a man
with a mission, and " Tries at Truth " is, iu our judg-nient. quite
too_mod(!sl_ a designation for the volume to which it' is attaclied.
It is possible to admit that the accent of sincerity pervades
these oracular deliverauces, without at the same time committing
ourselves to anything in the nature of a hearty eudorsomen"t
ot their wisdom. Mr. White expresses the ho])e that there will
be fotmd some " elements of strength iu thoughts that have been
written ouly after prolonged labour"; but i'^f there are we are
bound to add tliat we have missed them. The book is'unciues-
tionably writti^n with tli,> best intentions, but it is vitiated by
the rather fus.sy and emotional character of its benevolence
Here and there Mr. White, iu dealing with the social questions
ot the hour, strikes the nail ou the head, aud, like the late
Lord Beacousiiekl, he is on the side of the angels. It matters
not wliat the subject may be— Socialism, strikes, drink over-
crowding, pauper immigrathm, amusements— ho is prepared to
-set everyl)ody right, and he not seldom proceeds to do so
by tricking out a few familiar moral commouplaces and obvious
retiections in a smart dress of highly coloured rlietoric. What-
ever originality the book can claim Ties in the direction of catch-
penny phrase and stilted grandiloquence of expression. It is
really dreadful to read jiage after pag<> all too ideutifiillv
decorated with this sort of tiling-'- The Lamb of Labour will
lie down with the Lion of Capital only when he is inside
or when he is admitted as a iiartner." Wo counsel Mr. Arnold
VV lute, to give diligent heed himself to at least a brace of his
own seutentious deliverances— for they might have been written
coneeruiiig the book before us—" Rhetoric has injured labour
IU the past, and - T ntutored emotion has wrought evcu more
harm than deliberate wrong."
Under the modest title of •' A School History and Geography
of Northeru India," Sir William W. Hunter has just wdtten a
* The Poetical Wohks of John CiuEENLEAF Whittieu. With Life
Isotes, ami Index. The Albion Editiou. Loudon: Frederick
V\ arue A: Co. Crown Svo.
AV0EK3. By Xorm.an Mueleoil, D.D. Illustrated. Loudou : diaries
Humet A: Co. Oomv Svo. (lis. lid.)
Tries AT^TuuTU By Arnold White, Author of " Problems of a Oreat
i^itj , etc. Loudon : Isbister & Co. Crowu Svo.
■*■ ^w.*;P^ ^'™'"' ^'° tiEOOKAPHY OF NoiiTHEHN IXDIA. Bv Sir
il^ iri"J- r '''"? ^r"'"' KC-S.I., CLE., LL.B. Calcutta : k K.
i^alim A. Co. Lomlon : Henry Frowde. Crown Svo C^s 6d )
By Richarci S^ley, M.D.. Member of the Koval Collc-e of Phv-'icians
& Co." Kovafsvo™"'' "'"' ^'"' ^'"''''^ ^""'S""^"^, Ureeu
The UrcEU Tk x .- a Story ot' the \-ciy Be.st Society. By Sebastian
DimySvo (K) "'"'• ^""''°" ^ Sampson Low, Marston & Co
WAY. New and EcvLsed Edition. Illustrated. London, Paris and
Melbourne : Cassell & Co. Crowu Svo. (Is.) "u, ir,u.» auu
singularly able summary of facts relating to Bengal and the
Northern Provinces. The manual— a little book of one
hundred and iifty pages, packed with terselv-expressed and
clearly-arranged information— has been prepared for use in the
schools of India, but it is also hoped that it may prove of ser-
vice to young English and American readers. It is. in truth, a
masterly epitome, and we do not know which we admire most :
its conciseness or its comprehensiveness. We only wish that
the majority of .school books on history and geograid"iy displayed
anything like the skill and research of this vigorous'aud attrac-
tive volume on Northern India.
Dr. Sisley's mouogra]ih on " Epidemic Intluenza " is a book
which ajijieals chiefly to the faculty, and yet. at the same time,
it is not without a certain painful interest to ordinary people.
He believes that inHuen/.a is contagious, aud he agrees with
Professor Klein and other authorities that the disease is prob-
ably diK! to a microscopic organism. It seems clear that influ-
enza spreads along the lines of human intercourse, for statistics
prove that large towns are affected sooner than small ones,
whilst village communities often escape the visitation of the
epidemic. It is a curious fact that the inhabitants of asylums.
prisons, convents, and other places more or less cut oii' from
contact with the outer world, frefjuently pass unscathed, even
wlien the disease is raging all luuiid. " Dr. Sisley thinks that
iuHueii/.a. by a short Act of Parliament, ought to" bo placed in
the category of infectious di.seases for which notification is com-
pulsoi-}', and the whole drift of his argument goes to jirove the
necessity of stringent precautions, as well as regulations, in
regard to this insidious maladv. The book is plentifully
supplied with illustrative charts," aud at each stage of the
inquiry Dr. Sisley rests his case ou statistics which cannot
be challenged.
The freaks and foibles of a certain set of rich and idle people
of rank are caricatured with a little cleveruess and a good deal
of cynicism in " The Upper Ten : a Story of the verv best
Soc:e'y.' The story, such as it is, is thrown 'into dramatic" form,
aud, in consequence, we are supposed to overhear a succession of
conversations, some of which are not half so amusing as might
be expected from the complications which arise. This rather
exaggerated aud occasionally pointless exhibition of contem-
porary manners is dedicated"to M. Edouard Paillesou. and the
authors gracefully hint that he is in a measure responsible
for the work by virtue of '• Le Monde ou I'on s'cnnuie."
Now that the tourist season has set in w-ith its usual severity,
guide-books, big and little, assume a sudden importance. Quite
one of the best popular books of the kind— iu size and .shape
like a well-dressed •' Bradshaw "—is " The Offici.il Guide to the
Loudon and North Western Railway." Of course, official
guides require to be read with a little healthy scepticism, for
they naturally pounce upon the ]iicturesqiie. and. with judicious
express-paced .speed, rush past, with the briefest possible allusion,
less-favoured localities. The North AVesteru Railway, with its
associated systems, now extends over some six thousand miles,
aud iu this volume of four hundred pages will be f(nind com-
pressed a va.st amount of useful and explicit information, and
less word-painting tlian is generally the ease in works of the
sort. The traveller. f<u- cxamjde, will find the distances fnmi
Eustou and other important stations ; the time allowed for
stoppages in the course of a long jouruey ; and particulars of the
letter-boxes, po.stal telegraph offices, boo'kstalls, and ref reshmeut-
roouis provided. luformatiou is also given ccmcerniug looji and
branch lines, aud the various coaches, steamers, and "Ims
which p!y in counection with the railway. The chief publ
buildings and hotels ot the cities aud towns reached by the
North Western Railway are also indicated, and the volume is
provided witli a capital index, so that it is possible to find (Uit at
once all that the Guide has to say eoiieerniiii;- some two tliousand
places at which the trains stop. "The new edition which has just
been brought out contains several .'idditional maps, jilaus, and
illustrations ; and, thanks to Mr. Neele, the superinteudeui of
the line, and his ju-incipal assistants, the details have been ccn-
siderably amplitied. and. what jierhaps is still more to the point,
have also been verified up to the date of publication.
scs
lie
NOTICE.
— o —
EdITOKIAX COMSnT^nCATIONS
should be addressed to "TnEEDiTOE," aud Advertisements to "The
Manaoer," at 11.5, Fleet Street, E.G.
The Editor cannot return Manuscripts which are sent to him
unsolicited.
Adveetisembn'ts
should be received not later than Thursday Moenino.
Applications for copies of The Speaker, and Subscriptions, should be
sent to Casskix & Com- any. Limited, La Belle Sauvage, London, E.C.
The Speaker may be obtained in Paris every Satm-day morning at
No. 12, Rue Bleue. "
Teems of StJBscEipnoN by Post —
Yearly
Half-yearly
Quarterly
£1 8s.
Us.
78.
August 15, 1891.]
THE SPEAKER
Mr. T. Fisher Unwin's New Books.
THE L I F K OK WILLIAM 11. UK 0 E K .M .-^ N Y.
Crown 8vn, i:;,.ih. ailt t.il>, wilh ■; Pi.rlr.iils price 6>.
THE YOUNG EMPEROR: a -Study in Chararter-
l>,.^jL,. .,,, ,.i, ., I:,, I. HakuLi. FKhUERIC, Author of "Inlhc
Vullcy, ••The L;iw i.in, .m.
" A% inlertsting as any novel, anil is, moreover, :in importanl contribution to the
political history of the day."— /"a// Mall Caztllc.
A TOUR ON THE THAMES.
THE STREAM OF PLEASURE : a Narrative of a
louriirv .1, .1. l.i^iiLcslruniUvl , . 1 1 i.. I'.y Ji.sKlH anj Kl.iZAHtTH
kolilNs PliVNtLL. About 50 INustraliui.s l.y JoSEl'll Pe.nnell. hmall
crown 4to, clotb, 5s.
'• Mrv Pennell is bright and amusing. Mr. Pennell's sketches of riverside bits
and nooks are charniinc ; and a useful practical chapter has been wnllcn by Mr.
J. G. Legge. The book is an artistic U^M."— Scotsman.
With many Portraits and Illustrations. Royal 8vo, clolh, 21s.
LIFE OF JOHN BOYLE O'REILLY.
ll\ IamES I. KiitllE. TiiKelber wilh bis coni|)lete Poems :iml Speeches.
Ediied by '.Mr.s. John Boyle G'Rkiliv. With Inlruduclion by H. K.
Cardinal GlimoNS, .■\rcbbishop of Ballinn.re.
" Mr. Roche's book is most interesting. . . . We think the book will teach
much to those who wish to know what manner of man an Irish rebel and conspirator
may \x."—Th{ Sf taker.
\' UiTK- V, (Q STROYLl 14 Nmv Ready.
THE CENTURY DICTIONARY: An Encyclopedic
Lexicon olllie Kr.nlisl. L..i.ku.ikc. I-Jiltj by Prof. W. D. WlMT.SEV, Ph.D.,
LL.1). Profusely .ind artistically Illustrated. The Vo umes, in clolh gilt,
sprinkled edges, price i,^ 2S. each ; or half-morocco, cloth sides, marbled
ed(;es, price .£.■ 16s. each. Also in Twenty-four Monthly Parts, limp clolh,
price 10s. 6d. each.
" When one tests its articles, one has no hesitation in concluding that the ' Cen-
tury Dictionary ' is the best practical and most business-like * Lexicon of the English
Language * that exists. . . . May be safely recommended to buyers as far and
.away the best book of its class in the market."— /"//*■ Speaker.
Price rs. 6d.
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ETHICS.
The Modem Conception of the Science of Religion. Professor Edward Caird.
The Functions of Ethical Theorj-. Profcs-sor Janice H. Hyslop.
The Morality of Nations. Professor W. R. Sorley.
I. S. Mills Science of Etliology- James Ward.
Vice and Immorality. R. W, Black.
The Progress of Political Economy since Adam Smith. F. W. Newman.
Programme of School of Applied Ethics.
Discussions :— The Moral Aspect of "Tips" and ** Gratuities." By Christine Ladd
Franklin.— Notes on Current Periodical Literature.
Book Rcvievt-s. ^
THE PSEUDONYM LIBRARY.
The Best HooLs for Holiday Kt-atiittf;. }{atuiyj\
Oblong 24mo, paper
a. Mademoiselle Ixe. By Lanoe
Fai C'Nek. Seventh Edition.
. The Story of Eleanor Lambert.
By .Ma.,dale.\ Bkuoke. Secijud
Editiun.
. A Mystery of the Campagna,
and A SH.AUOW on a WAVE.
By \'i>N UKi.tN. Second Edition.
. The School of Art. By Isabel
Snow. Second Edition.
From The Pali, Mall Gazette, July 31, :89i :—
Mr. Gladstone's daughter, ivhose approbation, coupled with that 0/ her /ather,
^are so g^reat a vo_^ue to Miss Haivkcrs ' Mmiemoiselk I.te^ has becPt scarcely
less pleased ivith her »ezo book, ' The Hotel d^ Anglctcrre' Mrs. Drc^f
writes : — ' " The Hdtel d'Attgleterre, and Other Stories " site thought almost
perfect specimens 0/ delicate tvorkinanship out 0/ the slightest materials. " A
Russian Priest" ' impressed her so viz'ldly thai she asked her father to read it.
Mr. Gladstone finished it yesterday ; he thinks it deeply interesting and hopes
it will be widely circulated' "
the rocket in si^e and sha^e.
.. 6d. ; ( Ic'th, 2s.
Amaryllis. By FEnprios
APOi:iNH£. Second Edition.
The HCtel d' Angle terre, and
other Stories. liy Lanoe Fal-
coner, .-Vuthor of " Mademoiselle
Ixe." Second Edition.
A Russian Priest. By
nOTAnENKO Second Edi-
tion.
The CENTURY ^FA GAZIXE/hr A UGUST
contains an .-Irlkle on" TWL GERMAN EMPEROR," /-y Mr- PofLINEV
liu.tLow, illustrated i-y juii-faj^e lortraits .;/ T.I.H. the Emperor and
Empress, and numerous other Pictures /rom Orii^inul Ihtiwitti;^ ly
Eminent .-irtists ami front Photographs. price IS. 4<i.
London: T. FISHER UNWIN, Paternoster Square, E.G.
OUR EYES.
Just published, TWELFTH EDITION,
With New Chapters on the Alleviation and Cure of
Short Sight and the Improvement in Old Sight.
OUR EYES,
AND HOW TO PRESERVE THEM, FROM
INFANCY TO OLD AGE.
WnH .si'l'Xl.'M. l.Nl-uk.M.-MlON .AbUUP .sl'ECT.-\tIJ->.
liV
<iOHN BROWNING. F.R.A.S F.R.M.S., &c.
Mith 70 niiislnitioiis. Ki^Mitcontli Tboiisand,
price 1>., cloth.
CHATTO & WINDUS, PICCADILLY, LONDON, W.,
.\.M> ALL eo<jk--i;llers.
S«nt free for is. 2d. by :he .\uthor, John Bko^^'Nisg, 63, Strand. London, W.C.
INSTEAD
or
QUILL.
" '\h< be»i pen we hlive cnmr »crufc»-"— A^ti/ Times.
FLYING SCOTCHMAN PEN.
H'oa.! J urneJ ■ uf luint. ■■ , . < ^ ,iu: iafKui'f
6d. and Is. per Box. Sample Box,
Is. Id. by post.
M AC N IV EN &CAMERON
WAVERLEY WORKS,
LEIGHTON PARK SCHOOL, READING
Hkab Master— benjamin TOWNSON, M.A. C»mb., B.A. I-ond.
This School has t«:en established with the sanction of the Vearly
Meeting of the Society of Friends, and under the management ••'
members of that Ixxiy, for the purpose of providing an education n^'i
inferior to that given at the leading Public Schools with a classical
and modern side. Terms— ..J^JS per term. For Particulars, apply !■
the Head Masiek, L«ighti>n Park School, Reading.
UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, BRISTOL.
sons of either sex, above (he ordinar>' school age, ihe means of tominuing
studies in Science, LanguaRes, HiMor>'t Literature, and Theor>- of Mu'.ic The
Chemical. Physical, Klectrical, Kngineerinf,;, Geological, and Biological Laboralon«
are open daily. 'Ihe Engineering Department includes Civil, Mechanical^ Electrical,
and Mining Engineering. Surveying and Archilectural Work ; and special arrange-
ments for practical work have l>tcri made with various Engineers in and near Bristol.
Several SCHOLAKSH II'S are tenable at the College.
ENGINEERING EDUCATION.
PROFESSOR J. RVAN, M.A., LL.M. (Catnb.), D.Sc. {LonJ.).
University Collece. Bristol.— Courses of Civil, Mechanical, Electrical^ and
> fvr per
ng tneii
DAR, containing full information, price is. (by post is. 3d.). There will be about
15 vacancies in October. .Applications, with references, .should be made as early as
possible to the Secrclar>-, from whom Prosi>ectus and particula
Clifton may be ublaititd.— Jamks Kaf thk, Sr-r.-lary.
of residence in
MB.. FRANK ADAMS, M.A.,
Having outgrown ihf rtsouiLfs of .Xmikki AK Hai.i,. is KEMuVlNG in
Sei'TEMbek to WELIJ.NGORE H.-\1.L, near Grantham.
Boys 0/ good character are recei-.ed from the PuMic Schools and preparatories
'cr a.tv of the /oli'r.i'in::^ : —
1 COLONIAL TRAINING AND FARMING AND FRUIT GROWING.
i MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING.
3 PRACTICAL CHEMISTRY AND PHOTOGRAPHY.
i PROFESSIONAL OR BUSINESS UFZ (BOOKKEEPING, SHORT-
HAND, TYPEWRITING). _ , , , . u
5 A General Useful Education, suuru i.; jumon.. iijc undciucd, .md the
backward. .K\\ boys l<!.ir!i Cirixnitnand Bookkeeping, and havf Manual Work daily,
outdoors or in. Fanners h.ived.iily Farm Work of ever\- kind onlhc F.-irtn and haa«e.
V'or Vrosin-rtus. ,i/,/.ft/ ftt Atilerrnr /lull, nttir \<<t I i iitfhti tti.
'■.\ real «.iiu s«ms lo l.c Mippliea l,y THE STATUTORY
TRUST INVESTMENT GUIDE, i>y Richard Marrack, barrister-at-
law, assi.stcd In 1'. C. .M.tiliieson and .Sons, >tock!irokcrs' (statisticians).
TliJ olijcct of the lK>ok is to inform trustees and beneficiaries, by mear«
of a detailed list, of llie securities in which they are allowed to invest
by statutor)' authority, without any autliority whatever from their settle-
ments. It is not the hrsi manual of the class, but it is the tirst in which
a list of investments actually available under the statute hxs l)een
prepared by stockbrokers' (statisticians), and combined with a state-
ment by a lawyer of the law relating to them.'' — 7'/;<- Times.
.Iiisl i.iihii.liiil, -JlfJ l>nflrt. /r.i;.. Srti, ./..., iirl.
SIMPKIN MARSHALL, Limited, Stationers' Hall Court, E.C.
11) .11 kO.MK K. JEKOMK.
Crown 8vo, 3S. 6d. each.
THREE MEN IN A BOAT.
THE DIARY OF A PILGRIMAGE.
Iiri-i..! . J. W. ARROWSMITH, 11. Quay Street.
;.„,.,;.,.. • SIMPKIN. MARSHALL. HAMILTON. KENT & CO.. Limited.
1 ^^A1U.1SHED
]B I 12.
:b x: c x^ :b .a. iv
SaulLajr.[.'.on Huildin^i, Cti»Dccn- Lane.
THREE per CENT. INTEREST allowed on DEPOSITS, repiyible oo
demand. TWO per CENT, on CURRENT ACCOUNTS, on minimum monlkl^
balance, when not drawn below Zioo. STOCKS, SHARES, and ANNUITIES
purchased and sold. ~^~~~~
SA.'VIKTCI'S I>BI>A.R"rn<IX3I«TC.
For the encouraj;emen( o( '["hrift the Bank receives small iutn* on deposit, and
allows inlerejl, at ihe rale of THREE per CENT, per annum, on each completed Zi.
The BIRKBECK ALMANACK, with full particulars, post tree.
FRANCIS RAVENSCROFT. .Manager.
./
VI
THE SPEAKER.
[August 15, 1891.
CASSELL & COMPANY'S ANNOUNCEMENTS.
" Almost worthy of Defoe. '—r/i<- Tiiiif».
NOTiCE.-TiaiJl LAST GREAT NAVAL WAR,
In Oik Voluim-. ./In. 7^'i/h J/ir/s and J'laiis. fs jiO'V r ady, price 2s.
This work, from t; 3 pen of an eminent strategical authority, is already pronounced to be the most important
essay of the Itind that has yet been issued from the press.
T/ie Times says :— " The wriler assumes that the war has broken out between this country and France, and tha- its issues are decided, as they needs must \k, at sea.
This hypothesis is uTOUght out with singular vividness and precision of detail, and with a masterly gras]) of the essential elements of sea power, and of the broad principles of
naval stratcg>-. The book is, in fact, a brilliant and most instrucivc essay on the higher policy of national defence, which has been made to a-ssume a popular form, by
putting the concrete for the abstract, with a regard for personal and realistic detail almost worthy of Defoe. . . . We have little but praise to give to ' The Last Great
Naval War " as a well conceived and admirably executed endeavour to lay before the countr>-, in a form intelligible to all, the true principles of naval stratcp-, and their
application in these latter days to the problem of national and Imperial defence. . . . ' The Last Great Naval War ' is a national object les.son of e.\ceptional interest
and value." - .
CASSELL S
STANDARD LIBRARY.
/V'/V, One SllilliDg i^iuh, in stiff covers ; or
Two ShlUiUgS cuch. handsomely I'oumi in cloth.
List of the Volumes already Published.
1. THE HEART OF MIDLOTHIAN.
2. THE LAST DAYS OF POMPEII.
;. AMERICAN HUMOUR.
4. SKETCHES BY BOZ.
5. MACAULAYS SELECTED LAYS
AND ESSAYS.
6. HARRY LORREQUER.
;. THE OLD CURIOSITY SHOP.
RIENZI. THE LAST OF THE
TRIBUNES.
THE TALISMAN.
THE SKETCH-BOOK.
THE LAST DAYS OF PALMYRA,
TALES OF THE BORDERS.
PRIDE AND PREJUDICE.
THE YELLOWPLUSH PAPERS.
THE LAST OF THE MOHICANS.
ib.v 17. PICKWICK PAPERS, uv.k)
iS. THE SCARLET LETTER.
10. HANDY ANDY.
20. THE HOUR AND THE MAN.
21. OLD MORTALITY.
22. POETRY AND PROSE SELEC-
TIONS FROM POE'S WORKS.
23. TRIALS OF MARGARET LIND-
SAY
24. ROME AND THE EARLY
CHRISTIANS.
25. JACK HINTON, THE GUARDS-
MAN.
26. EUGENE ARAM.
27. DEERSLAYER.
28. UNCLE TOM'S CABIN.
29. SHERIDAN'S DRAMATIC
WORKS.
30. PRINCE OF THE HOUSE OF
DAVID.
31 cS; 32. MARTIN CHUZZLEWIT. 12
li. TALES, POEMS, and SKETCHES
BY BRET HARTE.
34- LYTTON'S DRAMATIC WORKS.
35- SENSE AND SENSIBILITY.
36- LONGFELLOW'S PROSE WORKS.
37. SELECTIONS from the WORKS
of THOMAS HOOD.
38. OLIVER TWIST.
39- IVANHOE.
40 ADVENTURES of MR. LEDBURY.
41. LAST OF THE BARONS.
42. SIR WALTER SCOTT'S POEMS.
43- EVELINA.
44. THE PATHFINDER.
45- PEOPLE I HAVE MET.
46. THE KING'S OWN.
47- CAKES AND ALE.
48. BARNABY RU.DGE.
49- CHARLES O'MALLEY.
•50. THE PIONEERS.
51. TOWER OF LONDON.
52. INGOLDSBY LEGENDS.
53- THE PRAIRIE.
54 s^ sS. DOMBEYAND SON.
56. NIGHT AND MORNING.
57- KENILWORTH.
58. JANE EYRE.
59- WUTHERING HEIGHTS.
60. THE ANTIQUARY.
61 & 62. NICHOLAS NICKLEBY,
vols. )
vols.)
(2
NEW ISSUE So-ji Publishing in WEEKLY
VOL UAIES, in paper embers. 3d. ; or cloth. 6d.
OK
CASSELL'S
NATIONAL LIBRARY.
Willi Addiiionai \'olunies not hitherto pubhsheti
in this Series.
Edited by Prof. HENRY MORLEY.
l.lsT OF VOU'.MES .\LRE.\DV PUBLISHED.
»THE HAUNTED MAN. Dickens.
tJTOPIA. SIK r. M..KK.
LAYS OF ANCIENT ROME.
ESSAYS on BURNS and SCOTT.
WANDERINGS IN SOUTH
AMERICA. WAiHKiwN.
^HEROES and HERO-WORSHIP.
VOYAGES AND TRAVELS.
Maui n I'liLo.
HAMLET. ,Shakespe.'\re.
THE COMPLETE ANGLER.
\\'ai;i..,\
ESSAYS CIVIL AND MORAL.
Scott.
Sir .4.
OF
The LADY of the LAKE.
FRIENDS IN COUNCIL.
Hi I j's.
THE AUTOBIOGRAPHY
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN.
GRACE ABOUNDING. JUnvan.
THE RIVALS and THE SCHOOL
FOR SCANDAL, shkkida.n.
WARREN H. '^STINGS. Macaulav.
AREOPAGITICA. &c. Mi in in.
THE ANGEL IN THE HOUSE.
I o\ 1 N \V\ I' \ rM'iKI-.
*LIFE OF NELSON. Soiihi v.
THE BATTLE of the BOOKS. &c.
MERCHANT OF VENICE.
Sli \KI'"^1'1'. \K!'
SUBLIME AND BEAUTIFUL.
SIR
COVERLEY.
ROGER DE
Si I UK \M> .\lii)lsliN.
MACBETH. Shakespeare.
A DEFENCE of POESIE. si.mn.
PARADISE REGAINED. Mi
CHRISTMAS CAROL and THE
CHIMES. iM. KIN-.
ANTONY AND CLEOPATRA.
CHILDE HAROLD. Bvron.
MURAD THE UNLUCKY, &c.
MEASURE FOR MEASURE.
Cromn Bvo, boards, 2s. each.
CASSELL'S
RAILWAY LIBRARY.
NEW VOLfME.S.
R.
BY RIGHT NOT LAW. By
."sHEKAKh
WITHIN SOUND of the WEIR.
By Thiimas St. K. H.\ke.
THE MAN WITH A THUMB.
By W. C. HnisiiN (Bakllay NorthI.
COMMODORE JUNK. By George
.\Ia.n\tli.e Fenn.
TROY TOWN, The ASTONISH-
ING HISTORY OF. ii> ','.
The ADMIRABLE LADY BIDDY
FANE. I'A 1 KA.NK BAKRI I 1.
ST. CUTHBERT'S TOWER. By
I-"lure.nce Wakde.n.
CASSELL'S
"JAPANESE" LIBRARY.
Consisting of Popular Works printed on thin
paper, boiiird in Japanese style, covers in
Hater Colours, from Original Designs.
Twelve vols.. Is. 3d. eaeh net.
HANDY ANDY. By Sam_uel Lover.
OLIVER TWIST. By Charles
DU KEN'S,
IVANHOE. r.y Sir \Vai.ter Scott.
INGOLDSBY LEGENDS. By Rev.
K. 11, I'.akilwi.
THE LAST of the MOHICANS.
By 1 E-NlMljKF. t OOPEK.
The LAST DAYS of POMPEIL
Bv l.OKIi I.V 1 ION.
The YELLOWPLUSH PAPERS.
By W. M. TliAl KEKAV.
The LAST DAYS of PALMYRA.
By Ri;\, \V. Wakk.
JACK HINTON, THE GUARDS-
MAN. H\ I'llAKII's l.EXKK,
SELECTIONS from the WORKS
of THOMAS HOOD.
AMERICAN HUMOUR. Selected.
TOWER OF LONDON. By
IIAKKIsO.N AlNSWORTJJ.
.Sh,\m;sim;ake,
These Vola.
63. MARY BARTON.
CASSEbli'S CL.4SSIFIE1» <:ATAL.OOirE, confining ]xinicul.irs of upward
C.VSSELL & COMP.\NV, r.-.iiging in price from Threepence t "
•' Handy in form, tastefully printed on thin
li.i[)er, and bound in Japanese style, with
co\ers in water-colours from original designs,
and are altogether very attractive volumes." —
Daily News.
of One Thousand \'oi.u.mes published by Messrs.
Fifty Guineas, will be sent on request post free to any address.
y have h-cn specially prepared /or
this Xe~.o Issue,
CASSELL & COMPANY, Limited, Ludgate Hill, London ; Paris and Melbourne.
Printed anri Published for the r.opriclors by E. J. Knight, at the Office, i, La Belle Sauvage, Ludgate Hill. B.C.— London, Saturday, -August 15, 1891.