Skip to main content

Full text of "Speech of Hon. E.C. Ingersoll, on the joint resolution to amend the Constitution abolishing slavery : delivered in the House of Representatives, June 15, 1864"

See other formats


SPEECH 


ON 


THE  JOINT   RESOLUTION   TO  AMEND   THE 
CONSTITUTION  ABOLISHING  SLAVERY. 


DELIVERED  IN  THE  HOUSE  OF  REPRESENTATIVES,  JUNE  15,  1S64. 


The  House  Laving  under  consideration  the  following  joint  resolution,  submitting 
to  the  legislatures  of  the  several  States,  a  proposition  to  amend  the  Constitution  of 
the  United  States. 

Be  it  enacted  by  the  Senate  and  House  of  Representatives  of  the  United  States  of 
America,  in  Congress  assembled,  (two  thirds  of  both  houses  concurring,)  That  the 
following  article  be  proposed  to  the  several  States  as  nn  amendment  to  the  Consti- 
tion  of  the  United  States,  which,  when  ratified  by  three-fourths  of  said  legisla- 
tures, shall  be  valid,  to  all  intents  and  purposes,  as  a  part  of  the  said  Constitution, 
namely : 

ARTICLE  XIII. 

Sec.  1.  Slavery  being  incompatible  with  a  free  government,  is  forever  prohib- 
ited in  the  United  States,  and  involuntary  servitude  shall  be  permitted  only  as  a 
punishment  for  crime. 

Sec.  2.  Congress  shall  have  power  to  enforce  the  foregoing  section  of  this  article 
by  appropriate  legislation. 

Mr.  INGERSGLL,  of  Illinois,  said: 

Mr.  Speaker:  Having  very  recently  taken  a  seat  in  this  body,  it  was 
my  intention  to  have  contented  myself  with  voting  for  all  such  measuies  as 
I  believed  to  be  just  and  expedient,  and  against  such  a$  I  believed  to  be 
unjust  or  inexpedient  without  taking  part  in  the  discussion  of  such  meas- 
ures. But  injustice  to  the  libeity-loving  and  Union-loving  men  who  sent 
le  here,  and  in  justice  to  myself  I  ask  the  indulgence  of.  the  House  for 
the  few  minutes  which  have  been  generously  given  me  by  my  friend,  the 
the  honorable  gentleman  from  California,  [Mr.  Shannon,]  out  of  his  hour, 
in  which  to  discuss  the  joint  resolution  now  under  consideration.  I  have 
the  proud  honor  to  represent  a  district  in  which  a  very  great  majority  of 
the  people  are  thoroughly  and  unalterably  anti-slavery.  They  are  in  favor 
of  justice  and  against  oppression  and  wrong  everywhere  and  in  every  form. 
There  are  two  grand  objeets  for  the  accomplishment  of  which  they  have 
already  freely  given  of  their  best  blood  and  treasure,  and  stand  ready  to- 
day to  give  much  more  of  both,  if  necessary,  for  the  absolute  and  uncon- 
ditional crushing  out  of  this  most  wicked  and  devastating  rebellion,  and 
for  the  complete  and  utter  extinction  of  human  slavery,  the  sole  and  fear- 


ful  cause  of  the  rebellion.  I  know  full  well  if  the  lamented  Lovejoy,  my 
honored  and  noble  predecessor,  could  come  to-day  from  the  unseen  world 
and  take  his  place  among  us,  his  manly  and  eloquent  voice  would  be  heard 
in  this  Hall,  as  in  days  past,  with  all  the  earnestness  of  his  great  soul,  pro- 
nouncing in  favor  of  the  adoption  of  this  resolution,  in  favor  of  universal 
liberty  and  the  rights  of  mankind.  The  cause  of  liberty  and  equal  and 
exact  justice  lost  a  noble  and  heroic  friend  when  he  died,  and  the  Union 
cause  and  the  country  lost  one  of  their  best  and  boldest  champions.  A 
grateful  people  hold  him  in  affectionate  remembrance,  and  it  is  to  be  hoped 
they  may  emulate  his  many  virtues.  He  died  in  the  midst  of  his  great 
and  good  work;  but  God,  in  His  infinite  wisdom  and  goodness,  did  not  suf- 
fer him  to  depart  until  the  abolition  of  slavery  in  this  country  was  ap- 
proaching with  rapid  step  the  grand  and  glorious  day  of  its  consummation. 
And  I  say  with  all  my  heart,  may  Heaven  speed  the  day.  Universal  lib- 
erty was  the  child  of  his  heart,  and  he  lived  long  enough  to  see  that  di- 
vine child  adopted  as  its  own  by  the  nation. 

Sir,  I  hope  this  resolution  may  pass  by  the  necessary  majority  to  give  it 
validity.  All  truly  honest  and  philanthropic  men  throughout  the  world  will 
have  reason  to  rejoice  and  will  rejoice  if  it  so  passes.  It  would  be  heralded 
over  the  world  as  another  grand  step  upward  and  onward  in  the  irresistible 
march  of  a  christainized  civilization.  The  old  starry  banner  of  our  country, 
as  it  "floats  over  the  sea  and  over  the  land,"  will  be  grander  and  more  glori- 
ous than  even  before.  Its  stars  will  be  brighter;  it  will  be  holier;  it  will  mean 
more  than  a  mere  nationality  ;  it  will  mean  universal  liberty  ;  it  will  mean 
that  the  rights  of  mankind,  without  regard  to  color  or  race,  are  respected  and 
protected.  The  oppressed  and  the  down-trodden  of  all  the  world  will  take 
new  courage;  hope  will  spring  afresh  in  their  struggling  and  weary  hearts; 
and  when  they  look  upon  that  banner  in  distant  lands  they  will  yearn  to 
be  here,  where  they  can  enjoy  the  inestimable  blessings  which  are  denied 
them  forever  on  their  native  shores. 

Mr.  Speaker,  it  would  seem  that  this  resolution  should  be  adopted  by  a 
unanimous  vote.  Yet  I  fear  we  shall  lose  it.  The  slave  power  has  not  yet 
lost  all  its  influence  in  this  Congress.  The  pock-marks  of  slavery  are  plain- 
ly visible  on  the  faces  of  many  of  the  members  of  the  Opposition.  They 
were  inoculated  and  corrupted  by  it  in  the  days  of  its  wanton  power.  Its 
woeful  and  baneful  influence  is  upon  them  still.  Slavery  has  been  their 
idol.  They  have  worshiped  at  its  shrine  in  the  days  of  its  power,  and  even 
now,  when  it  is  going  to  an  ignominious  grave,  they  rally  around  and  pro- 
tect and  defend  it  in  all  its  hideous  ghastliness  as  though  it  were  really  di- 
vine. We  may  admire  their  pluck,  but  we  must  condemn  their  action,  their 
want  of  patriotism,  their  inappreciation  of  liberty,  and  their  entire  lack  of 
generous  sentiment  common  to  humanity.  They  are  blinded  by  prejudice. 
They  are  politically  corrupt,  under  an  undue  desire  to  regain  that  power 
which  they  so  ingloriously  lost  during  the  last  Democratic  administration, 
or,  I  should  say,  maladministration.  Being  the  slaves  of  the  slave  power, 
we  cannon  expect  much  of  them  until  we  have  made  them  free  and  hewn 
down  their  prejudices. 

In  my  opinion  many  of  the  Opposition  members  would  vote  for  this  res- 
olution if  they  could  be  convinced  that  slavery  could  no  longer  be  made 
available  to  them  as  a  political  power.  But  they  know  it  as  certain  as  fate 
that  if  slavery  goes  down  the  present  Democratic  organization  goes  down 
with  it.  Hence  their  herculean  efforts  to  save  slavery  ;  but  they  cannot 
succeed  in  their  unholy  and  detestable  work.     The  liberty-loving  and  loyal 


people  of  this  country  liave  sworn  in  their  hearts  that  the  rebeliion  and 
slavery  shall  both  &6  down,  arid  forever.  And  they  will  keep  that  oath. 
When  we  have  succeeded  in  burying  the  rebellion  and  slavery,  if  we  could 
only  petrify  the  pro-slavery  Democracy,  what  a  becoming  and  fitting  tomb- 
stone it  would  make  to  mark  the  place  of  their  burial; 

There  can  be  no  objection  on  legal  grounds  to  amend  the  Constitution, 
in  the  precise  manner  pointed  out  by  (hat  instrument  ir self.  Article  five 
of  the  Constitution  provides  for  its  own  amendment  as  follows  : 

"Art.  5.  The  Congress,  whenever  two  think  of  both  Houses  shall  deem  it  necessary f 
shall  propose  amendments  to  this  Constitution,  or,  on  the  application  of  the  Legis- 
latures of  two  thirds  of  the  several  Slates,  shall  call  a  convention  for  proposing 
amendments,  which,  in  either  case  shall  b*i  valid  to  all  intents1  and  purposes,  as 
part  of  this  Constitution,  when  ratified  by  t  lie  Legislatures  of  three  fourths  of  the 
several  States,  or  by  conventions  in  three  fourths  thereof,  as  the  one  or  the  other 
mode  of  ratification  may  be  proposed  by  the  Congress  ;  provided,  that  no  amendment 
which  may  be  made  prior  to  the  year  1808  shall  in  any  manner  affect  the  first  and 
fourth  clauses  in  the  ninth  section  of  the  first  article;  and  that  no  State,  without  its 
consent  shall  be  deprived  of  its  eqiml  suffrage  in  the  Senate." 

It  is  plain  to  be  seen,  then,  that  this  resolution  contemplates  no  viola- 
tion of  the  Constitution.  Then  why  this  objection  to  adopting  it  and  sub- 
mitting the  proposed  amendment  to  the  Legislatures  of  the  several  States 
not  in  rebellion  ?  Are  you  of  the  Opposition  afraid  to  trust  the  representa- 
tives of  the  people  ?  In  reality  I  believe  you  are.  You  fear,  and  have 
good  cause  to  fear,  that  the  necessary  majority  of  States  will  ratify  the 
proposed  amendment,  and  make  it  thereby  a  part  of  the  Constitution. 
Then  slavery  will  no  longer  need  defenders  and  protectors  in  our  national 
Congress.  "  Othello's  occupation  "  will  be  gone  indeed.  You  wiil  go  hun- 
gry for  place  and  office,  and  slavery  can  no  longer  gratify  your  unholy 
ambition.  But  the  people  will  rejoice,  the  friends  of  freedom  every  where 
will  rejoice,  and  our  country  will  be  infinitely  more  prosperous,  more  glo- 
rious, and  grander  than  ever  before. 

But  the  Opposition  object  to  the  adoption  of  this  resolution  at  the  pres- 
ent time,  because  they  say  Mississippi,  South  Carolina,  and  other  States  in 
rebellion  can  have  no  voice  upon  the  question  of  its  ratification.  Is  this  a 
good  objection  ?  I  answer  not.  Why  is  it  that  Mississippi  and  South  Caro- 
lina can  have  no  voice  upon  this  question?  It  is  because  they  voluntarily 
entered  into  this  rebellion.  Had  they  not  done  so  they  would  have  had 
equal   right  and  enjoyed  equal  privilege  with  Illinois   upon  this  question. 

Are  we,  because  a  portion  of  the  States  inaugurated  and  still  carry  on 
this  rebellion,  to  suspend  all  legislative  action  which  might  affect  things  or 
institutions  in  such  States  ?  I  say  not.  Let  those  who  inaugurate  and 
carry  ou  the  rebellion  take  the  conseqences.  We  are  responsible  to  the 
Constitution  and  the  loyal  people,  not  to  the  disloyal  and  rebels.  It  is  truly 
said  that  at  almost  any  time  it  is  well  to  do  right.  It  is  well  to  eradicate 
an  evil.  That  slavery,  is  an  evil  no  sane,  honest  man  will  deny.  It  has 
been  the  great  curse  of  this  country  from  its  infancy  to  the  present  hour. 
And  now  that  the  States  in  rebellion  have  given  the  loyal  States  the  op- 
portunity to  take  off  that  curse,  to  wipe  away  the  foul  stain;  I  say  let  it  be 
done.  We  owe  it  to  ourselves  ;  we  owe  it  to  posterity  ;  we  owe  it  to  the 
slaves  themselves  to  exterminate  slavery  in  this  country  forever  by  the 
adoption  of  the  proposed  amendment  to  the  Constitution.  If  we  fail  to 
do  it,  now  that  we  have  the  power,  not  only  will  our  constituents  but  pos- 
terity aud  humanity  hold  us  responsible,  and  remember  us  only  to  con- 
demn. 


I  hold  that  slavery  and  rebellion  are  so  closely  allied  that  any  act,  legis- 
lative or  military,  which  cripples  the  one  tern's  to  destroy  the  other.  ]f 
slavery  could  be  abolished  to-day  the  rebellion  would  end  to-morrow.  It* 
the  rebellion  could  be  put,  down  to-day  slavery  would  go.down  to-morrow. 
So  that  in  my  opinion  any  act  that  we  can  do,  which  is  lawful  in  itself!,  to 
weaken  slavery,  if  we  should  tail  to  do  it,  we  would  be  c; iniinall v  culpa- 
ble. 

I  believe  slavery  is  the  mother  of  this  rebellion,  that  this  rebellion  can 
be  attributed  to  n  >  other-  cau?e  hut  slavery;  from  that  it  derived  its  life  and 
gathers  its  strength  to-day.  Destroy  the  mother;  and  the  child  will  die. 
Destroy  the  cause,  and  the  affect  will  disappear.  Slavery  has  ever  been 
the  enemy  of  liberal  princip'es.  Is  has  ever  been  the  friend  of  ignorance, 
prejudice  and  all  the  unlawful,  savage,  and  detestable  passions  which 
proceed  therefrom.  It  has  ever  been  domineering,  arrogant,  exacting, 
and  overbearing.  It  has  claimed  to  be  a  polished  aristocrat,  when  in 
reality  it  has  only  been  a  coaise,  swaggering,  and  brutal  boor.  It  has  ever 
claimed  to  be  a  gentleman,  when  in  ieality  it  has  ever  been  a  villian.  I 
think  it  is  high  time  to  clip  its  overgrown  pretensions,  strip  it  (if  its  mask, 
and  expose  it  in  ail  hideous  deformity  to  the  detc&iation  of  all  honest  and. 
patriotic  men. 

For  eighty  years  the  bogus  aristocracy  of  slavery  have  left  nothing 
undone  to  corrupt  and   demorilize  the  people  and  their  Representatives. 

For  eighty  years  they  have  attempted  to  clothe  this  monster  in  the 
radiance  of  divinity,  when  in  reality  it  should  only  be  draped  in  the  black- 
ness of  its  own  enormity.  In  order  to  maintain  their  power  they  had  so 
molded  public  opinion,  even  in  the  grand  free  States  of  the  North,  ihat 
many  honest  but  deluded  men  were  willing'  to  concede  that  slavery,  if  not 
divine,  was  not  so  bad  an  institution  after  all,  that  "the  devil  was  not  so 
black  as  lie  is  painted."  The  North,  against  its  sense  of  justice  and  right, 
tor  the  sake  of  peace  and  Union,  has,  time  and  time  again,  humiliated  itself 
in  its  own  and  the  eyes  of  the  world  by  conceding  to  the  unhallowed  and 
ambitious  demands  of  slavery. 

At  the  formation  of  our  Constitution  slavery  demanded  that  a  section 
should  be  incorporated  therein  restraining  Congress  from  passing  a  law 
prohibiting  the  importation  of  negroes  prior  to  the  year  1808.  The  North, 
in  violation  of  its  sense  of  honor,  got.  down  upon  its  knees  and  consented 
that  it  should  be  "written  in  the  bond,"  thereby  conceding  the  right  to  this 
bogus  aristocracy  to  freight  its  ships  with  human  beings  stolen  Irom  their 
native  land  and  consigned  to  an  ignominious  slavery  only  equaled  by  its 
savage  cruelty. 

Again,  in  1793,  they  demanded  a  fugative  slave  law;  that  is  to  say,  that 
free  northern  men  should  be  their  blood-hounds.  The  North  again  assent- 
ed, and  went  into  the  blood-hound  business.  In  1850  they  again  demanded 
more  and  fiercer  blood-hounds.  The  North,  true  to  its  instincts  of  peace 
and  union,  but  false  to  its  honor,  agreed  that  the  blood-hounds  should  be 
forthcoming.  For  one — and  I  am  happy  to  say  that  I  am  not  alone — I  am 
tired  of  this  blood-hound  business,  and  voted  on  Monday  last  to  abolish  it. 
The  Opposition  are  in  favor  of  its  coutinuance;  I  am  for  this,  amendment 
to  the  Constitution,  in  order  to  take  from  these,  adherents  of  die  s'ave, 
power  the  ignominy  and  degradation  consequent  upon  so  base  an  occupa- 
tion. 

Again,  in  1820,  the  same  relentless  monster  demanded  of  the  North 
more  territory  for  the  use  of  slavery.     The  North  again  got  upon  its  knees 


5 

and  admitted  Missouri  with  a  slave  constitution,  and  again  suffered  the 
mortification  of  self-degradation. 

Again,  in  1854,  they  demanded  the  repeal  of  the  Missouri  compromise 
line.  Again,  in  northern  men,  whom  they  had  demoralized  and  corrupted 
by  the  contaminating  influence  of  slavery,  united  to  a  corresponding  lust 
for  office,  they  found  the  willing  tools  wherewith  to  consummate  this 
treachery.  Liberty  received  a  blow  in  the  face,  and  slavery  was  taken  by 
the  hand. 

Again,  in  1857,  the  slave  power  brought  all  its  enegies  to  bear  to  con- 
vert this  territory,  which  had  been  thrown  open  to  it  by  the  repeal  of  the 
Missouri  compromise  line,  into  a  slave  State.  To  the  infamy  of  James 
Buchanan's  Administration  be  its  said,  with  a  few  honorable  exceptions,  it 
lent  the  whole  force  and  power  of  its  authority  to  the  accomplishment  of 
this  foul  crime.  But,  thank  God,  the  people  of  the  North  at  last  had  be- 
come aroused,  and  they  determined  that  slavery  should  no  longer  be  the 
master  of  liberty.  They  felt  it  in  their  hearts,  they  expressed  it  with 
their  lips,  that  they  would  no  longer  be  the  tools  of  slavery,  or  the  indif- 
ferent spectators  of  its  encroachments.  They  declared  that  Kansas  should 
be  free.  The  slave  power  swore  it  should  be  slave;  and  then  and  there 
this  war  commenced  which  is  now  deluging  this  land  with  blood.  After 
a  long  and  not  a  bloodless  struggle  justice  and  freedom  triumphed,  and 
Kansas  to-day  is  a  beaming  star  of  liberty  in  the  western  horizon.  The 
South  saw  in  this  triumph  the  ultimate  overthrow  of  their  most  cherished 
institution.  They  became  alarmed,  and  felt  and  knew  that  if  the  people 
of  the  North  were  unwilling  to  submit  to  further  degradation  thereafter 
they  must  depend  on  themselves  for  the  protection  of  slavery,  as  their 
northern  friends  were  powerless  to  stem  the  tide  which  was  rising  and 
swelling  toward  universal  liberty. 

So,  in  1860,  at  the  Charleston  convention  ihey  demanded  that  addi- 
tional guarantees  for  slavery  be  incorporated  in  the  platform  of  the  Demo- 
cratic party.  The  northern  Democracy  saw  at  once  that  to  yield  to  them 
on  this  point  was  certain  defeat.  The  South  repudiated  Douglas  in  that 
convention  for  the  reason  that,  they  did  not  believe  him  sound  on  the 
slavery  question.  As  an  evidence  of  his  unsoundness  they  pointed  to  his 
Ereeport  speech,  made  in  1858,  in  joint  debate  with  President  Lincoln. 
In  this  speeith  he  enunciated  the  doctrine  that  Territorial  Legislatures  pos- 
sessed the  power  to  exclude  slavery  from  the  Territories  by  "unfriendly 
legislation."  This  was  anything  but  orthodox  in  their  view.  Another 
•objection  to  Senator  Douglas  was  that  he  had  been  opposed  to  the  Le- 
compton-Kansas  constitution.  Consequently  Douglas  was  thrown  over- 
board. They  demanded  that  slavery  should  be  recognized  as  a  national 
institution,  and  that  Congress  should  protect  it  in  the  Territories  by  affirm- 
ative legislation.  The  northern  Democracy  positively  refused  to  accede  to 
this.  The  consequence  was  that  the  southern  Democracy  seceded,  and 
nominated  their  own  candidate,  upon  their  own  platform,  thereby  break- 
ing up  the  Democratic  party  and  depriving  it  of  all  hope  of  success  in 
the  then  approaching  presidential  campaign.  Who. can  say  but  that  the 
northern  wing  of  the  Democratic  party  is  responsible  for  this  war;  for  had 
the  northern  Democracv  been  willing  to  concede  at  that  convention  to  the 
dem  mds  of  the  South,  and  accept  a  platform  agreeable  to  it,  the  nominee 
of  'hat  convention  would  have  been  elected  President,  and  this  "  cruel 
and  bloody  war,"  as  the  Opposition  delight  to  call  it,  would  have 
been  avoided,   or,  at  any  rate,   postponed.     Let  the  responsibility  rest 


0 

where  it  legitimately  belongs.  It  is  dishonorable  in  any  man  to  say  that 
the  Republican  party  is  responsible  for  this  war,  when,  as  I  have  shown, 
it  perhaps  might  have  been  avoided  had  the  northern  Democracy  been 
willing  to  have  covered  themselves  with  a  thicker  coating  of  degradation 
than  they  had  ever  before  worn,  and  sacrificed  their  dignity  and  manhood 
to  the  behests  of  slavery. 

I  am  we'll  aware  that  the  Opposition  persistently  charge  that  the  aboli- 
tionists are  responsible  for  the  war  and  are  the  authors  of  the  war.  This 
charge  is  as  false  as  is  the  assertion  that  slavery  is  divine.  Had  there 
been  no  slavery  in  this  country  there  never  would  have  been  an  aboli- 
tionist or  an  agitator;  the  inhuman  and  barbarous  system  of  slavery 
created  the  abolitionist  and  the  agitator.  In  this  instance  the  evil  pro- 
dmvd  the  good — the  wrong  the  right;  and  the  good  and  the  right  must 
prevail.  Slavery  has  piled  up  the  mountain  which  will  fall  upon  it  and 
crush  it  to  dust,  Slavery  alone  is  the  cause  of  the  war,  and  he  who  at- 
tributes this  war  to  any  other  cause  than  slavery  is  wide  of  the  mark. 
The  man  who  to-day,  after  three  years  of  war  and  desolation,  would  raise 
even  a  straw  to  shield  or  protect  slavery,  deserves,  and  at  no  very  distant 
day  will  receive,  the  merited  condemnation  of  a  united,  happy,  prosper- 
ous, and  liberty-loving  people. 

It  is  a  humiliating  and  saddening  spectacle  to  witness  how  persistent!}7' 
and  unrelentingly  the  Opposition  pursue  our  most  worthy  President,  and 
with  what  vehemence  they  denounce  his  war  policy,  if  such  policy  in  their 
opinion  tends  in  the  least  to  interfere  with  the  institution  of  slavery.  If, 
under  the  war  power  of  the  Administration,  a  rebel  sympathizer,  who 
disgraces  the  soil  of  Illinois,  is  arrested  and  imprisoned,  if  a  disloyal  paper 
is  suppressed,  they  at  once  set  up  a  tremendous  howl  about  personal  lib- 
erty and  the  freedom  of  the  press.  If  an  attempt  is  made  to  expel  or 
censure  a  member  of  Congress  for  uttering  disloyal  sentiments,  another 
distressing  howl  goes  up  in  protestation  against  the  Administration.  Their 
denunciation  is  all  ? gainst  Lincoln.  They  utter  none  against  Davis.  Our 
soldiers  may  be  starved  in  Libby  prison;  they  may  be  butchered  in  cold 
blood,  as  at  Fort  Piilow  and  elsewhere  ;  Union  men  all  through  the  South 
may  be  indiscriminately  plundered  and  then  dragged  to  the  gallows,  and 
they  have  no  voice  to  raise  against  it  or  denounce  it.  The  reason  of  this 
is  obvious.  They  care  more  to  regain  political  power  than  for  the  triumph 
of  liberty  and  justice. 

The  eloquent  and  scholarly  Sumner  may  be  knocked  down  in  the 
United  States  Senate  by  a  southern  ruffian  and  blackguard  :  northern 
dough-faces  say,  "  Served  him  right."  A  Giddings  and  an  Adams  may 
t>e  censured  in  the  House  of  Representatives  because  they  have  the  man- 
hood to  raise  their  voices  in  behalf  of  liberty  and  justice  :  northern  dough- 
faces cry  out  again,  "  Served  them  right."  The  incorruptible  Parker, 
Codding,  and  Garrison  may  be  mobbed,  stoned  and  imprisoned,  for  daring 
to  give  utterance  to  the  sublime  and  eternal  principles  of  truth,  and  lib- 
erty, and  justice,  and  these  same  northern  doughfaces  rise  up  and  cry  out, 
"  Served  them  right."  A  northern  man  imbued  with  the  spirit  of  liberty 
may,  within  the  limits  of  a  slave  State,  have  the  effrontery  to  raise  his 
voice  against  oppression,  and  say,  "Your  system  of  slavery  is  wrong,  and 
you  ought  to  abolish  it:"  a  coat  of  tar  and  feathers  or  the  halter  may  be 
administered  as  a  corrective  of  such  heretical  expressions,  and  the  north- 
ern doughfaces  again  cry  out,  "  Served  him  right."  A  minister  of  the 
gospel  may  find  it  to  be  his   duty  to  say  to   his  people,  *'  It  is  right  that 


you  should  do  unto  others  as  ye  would  they  should  do  unto  you ;"  that 
you  ought  to  let  the  bondman  go  free  ;  and  he  is  immediately  denounced 
as  an  abolition  agitator,  and  the  varnished  hypocrites  of  his  church  call 
upon  him  at  once  and  say  they  cannot  tolerate  the  expression  of  such 
opinions  in  the  pulpit,  as  they  are  calculated  to  irritate  the  South,  and  he 
must  stop  them  or  they  will  withdraw  their  support.  Consequently  the 
poor,  good  preacher  must  close  his  lips  to  such  divine  and  heaven-born 
truths  or  starve,  and  this,  too,  in  a  free  State ;  and  again  the  northern 
doughfaces  say,  "  Served  him  right."  To  crown  all  this  record  of  infamy, 
the  martyr,  Elijah  P.  Lovejoy,  is  mobbed  and  murdered  on  the  free,  broad 
prairies  of  Illinois,  simply  for  the  crime  of  publishing  a  paper  dedicated  to 
the  advocacy  of  the  rights  of  mankind  ;  and  again  these  northern  dough- 
faces cry  out,  "Away  with  him,"  '"Served  him  right."  0  liberty,  where  is 
thy  power?  0  justice,  where  is  thy  strength  ?  But  thank  God  that  day 
is  gone,  and  gone  forever.  Let  us  take  courage  ;  the  world  is  better  ;  their 
sufferings  and  their  trials  were  not  in  vain  ;  libertv  is  stronger  ;  justice  is 
surer  ;  and  the  idols  of  oppression,  ignorance,  and  prejudice,  which  have 
been  worshiped  so  long,  are  crumbling  to  dust.  And  so  the  good  work 
goes  bravely  on.  It  is  as  irresistible  as  the  avalanche  and  as  grand  as  the 
Alps. 

Sir,  I  am  in  favor  in  the  fullest  sense  of  personal  liberty.  I  am  in  favor 
of  the  freedom  of  speech.  The  freedom  of  speech  that  I  am  in  favor  of  is 
the  freedom  which  guaranties  to  the  citizen  of  Illinois,  in  common  with 
the  citizen  of  Massachusetts,  the  right  to  proclaim  the  eternal  principles 
of  liberty,  truth,  and  justice  in  Mobile,  Savannah,  or  Charlston  with  the 
same  freedom  and  security  as  though  ke  were  standing  at  the  foot  of 
Bunker  Hill  monument ;  and  if  this  proposed  amendment  to  the  Consti- 
tution is  adopted  and  ratified,  the  day  is  not  far  distant  when  this  glori- 
ous privilege  will  be  accorded  to  every  citizen  of  the  Republic.  I  am  in 
favor  of  the  adoption  of  this  amendment  because  it  will  secure  to  the  op- 
pressed slave  his  natural  and  God-given  rights.  I  believe  that  the  black 
man  has  certain  inalienable  rights,  which  are  as  sacred  in  the  sight  of 
Heaven  as  those  'of  any  other  race.  I  believe  he  has  a  right  to  live,  and 
live  in  a  state  of  freedom.  He  has  a  right  to  breathe  the  flee  air  and  en- 
joy God's  free  sunshine.  He  has  a  right  to  till  the  soil,  to  ea?n  his  bread 
by  the  sweat  of  his  brow,  and  enjoy  the  rewards  of  his  own  labor.  He 
has  a  right  to  the  endearments  and  enjoyment  of  family  ties  ;  and  bo  white 
man  has  any  right  to  rob  him   of  or  infringe   upon  any  of  these  blessings. 

I  am  in  favor  of  the  adoption  of  this  amendment  to  the  Constitution  for 
the  sake  of  the  seven  millions  of  poor  white  people  who  live  in  the  slave 
States  but  who  have  ever  been  deprived  of  the  blessings  of  manhood  by 
reason  of  this  thrice-accursed  institution  of  slavery.  Slavery  has  kept 
them  in  ignorance,  in  poverty,  and  in  degradation.  Abolish  slavery,  and 
school-houses  will  rise  upon  the  ruins  of  the  slave  mart,  intelligence  will 
take  the  place  of  ignorance,  wealth  of  poverty,  and  honor  of  degradation  ; 
industry  will  go  hand  in  hand  with  virtue,  and  prosperity  with  happiness, 
and  a  disinthrall^d  and  regenerated  people  will  rise  up  and  bless  you  and 
be  an  honor  to  the  American  Repuplic. 

Slavery  has  shed  every  drop  of  blood  which  has  been  spilled  in  this 
war.  It  has  filled  thousands  of  graves  with  our  heroic  dead.  It  has 
filled  our  hospitals  with  our  shattered  heroes.  It  has  swept  American 
commerce  from  the  ocean.  It  has  carried  desolation  and  mourning  to 
the  hearthstones  of  our  northern  homes  from  Maine  to  California ;  conse- 


8 

qucutly  I  am  the  unyielding  arid  peisistent  enemy  of  slavery  and  the 
earnest  supporter  of  hitj  and  all  lawful  measures  for  its  speedy  and  effec- 
tual extinction.  It  is  this  demon  of  slavery  which  has  called  from  their 
happy  homes  in  Illinois  one  hundred  and  seventy-five  thousand  of  her  sons 
as  brave  and  heroic  as  ever  the  sun  shone  upon.  Donelson,  Shilob, 
Arkansas  Post,  Vicksburg,  and  many  other  well-fought  fields  attest  their 
devotion  to  liberty  and  Union.  Their  self-sacraficinp*  heroism  to  maintain 
the  honor  and  glory  of  the  Republic  has  won  for  them  a  fame  more  en- 
during than  granite  and  a  place  in  the  hearts  of  their  countrymen  so  long- 
as  liberty  shall  be  loved  and  justice  respected. 

I  wish  we  could  emulate  the  example  of  the  soldiers.  The  Democrat 
and  the  Republican  have  gone  together,  side  by  side,  fighting  these  great 
battles  for  liberty  and  Union.  They  have  allowed  no  former  political 
differences  to  divide  them,  or  to  weaken  their  devotion  to  the  cause.  They 
have  fought  side  by  side.  If  the  Democrat  falls  in  battle  the  Republican 
gathers  him  in  his  arms,  composes  his  limbs  in  death,  hollows  out  a  little 
place  in  the  earth,  and  therein  deposits  his'heroic  and  sacred  remains;  he 
covers  him  tenderly  with  the  earth  ;  he  marks  the  spot  where  he  lies,  that 
you  may  know  a  hero  sleeps  there ;  he  drops  a  tear  upon  the  grave,  and 
rushes  again  into  the  thickest  of  the  fight.  If  the  Republican  falls,  his 
Democratic  comrade  extends  to  him  the  same  sacred  charitv,  forgets  that 
he  was  a  Republican,  and  only  remembers  that  he  was  a  heroic  soldier  of  the 
Union.  Why  cannot  we,  far  from  the  roar  of  the  battle,  secure  in  the  en- 
joyments of  peace — seemed  only  by  the  heroism  and  devotion  of  the 
Army — forget  that  we  ever  have  been  partisans,  and  unite,  with  heart  and 
hand,  for  the  suppression  of  the  rebellion  and  establishment  of  "  Liberty  and 
Union,  one  and  inseparable  V 

Mr.  Speaker,  I  have  already  occupied  too  much  time.  There  is  a  great 
deal  more  that  I  would  like  to  say,  but  I  must  forbear.  I  implore  the 
House  to  adopt  this  resolution.  I  implore  it  to  stand  by  the  Army  and 
the  country  and  the  war  policy  of  the  Administration,  and  the  day  is  not 
far  distant  when  we  may  rejoice  in  the  glorious  consummation  of  the 
eternal  principles  of  liberty,  truth,  and  justice.  "There  shall  be  no  more 
slavery  and  no  more  oppression,  no  more  tyranny  and  no  more  injustice, 
and  our  voices  may  go  up  together  in  one  grand  diapason  which  will  as- 
cend to  heaven  over  a  country  reunited,  over  a  people  disenthralled,  and 
God  will  oless  us. 


Printed  by  Lemuel  Towers,  corner  Louisiana  avenue  and  8tn  street,  Washington. 


■yi.'z-oo*  o$H, 01060,