Skip to main content

Full text of "Sporting Montana"

See other formats


/9S-Q 


MONTANA 


-  -«&•'' 


FALL  ISSUE 


Official  Publication  of 
*7/te  Mo*Ua*ta  tyi&U  and.  Qa*m  2befuVit*tte+tt 


STATE  OF  MONTANA 

John  W.  Bonner,  Governor 

MONTANA  FISH  AND  GAME  COMMISSION 

Elmer  Johnson,  Chairman  A.  C.  Grande,  Jr. 

Edward  M.  Boyes  Thomas  S.  Morgan 

William  Carpenter        Robert  H.  Lambeth,  Secretary 


When  we  speak  of  Montana's  wealth  of  natural  resources,  par- 
ticular emphasis  must  be  given  our  abundance  of  fish  and  game. 
No  other  state  surpasses  Montana  in  the  variety  and  number  of  fish 
and  game  species.  Many  of  our  State's  most  ardent  boosters  are 
sportsmen  from  Maine  to  California  who  hunted  our  forests  and 
fished  our  streams.  Their  chorus  of  acclaim  nearly  always  includes 
the  phrase  "You  Montanans  have  something  worth  protecting." 

They  are  one  hundred  per  cent  right!  Game  Conservation  is 
"everybody's  job"  and  a  program  to  which  all  Montana  citizens  must 
give  their  full,  year-'round  co-operation  if  our  youth  and  their  chil- 
dren are  to  enjoy  the  same  hunting  and  fishing  privileges  we  are  in- 
clined to  take  for  granted. 


^a/m  It/.  IZottnei 


REPRINT  PRIVILEGES 

Permission  to  reprint  any  of  the  articles,  or  portions  thereof,  appearing  in 
this  magazine  is  hereby  granted,  provided  a  credit  line  is  included. 


Your  Department's  Structure   Table  of  Contents 


Governor 


Montana  Fish  and 
Game  Commission 


STATE    FISH   AND 

GAME  WARDEN 

Robert  H.  Lambeth 

LAW 
ENFORCEMENT 
CHIEF   DEPUTY 
GAME  WARDEN 
Walter  Everin 

FISHERIES 
DIVISION 

Superintendent 
Walter  Allen 

r 

WILDLIFE 
RESTORATION 
DIVISION 

DIRECTOf* 
RoQERT   CoomEY 

GAME  FARM 
DIVISION 

Superintendent 
Ray  Wells 

r 

1 

MAINTENANCE 

FOREMAN 
REX    SMART 

ADMINISTRATION 
CHIEF    CLERK 
Ovti  WoolvCRToN 

PHOTOGRAPHIC 

FISCAL 
01  RECTOR 

Od£ll    Helmhm 

DIRECTOR 

Hector  LaLas*c 

PROPERTY 
CUSTODIAN 

KEITM    FRE5EMOW 

department 

£NC,IN£FR 
CK.  DRLIOIM 

PUBLIC  INFORMATION 

«*-     LEGAL 
JOHN  H.  RISKEN 

SpxvUina  Montana 

Lorraine  Kurfiss,  Editor 

Editorial   2 

Dingell  Bill 2 

Your  Commission 3 

Speaking  of  Conservation  5 

Sun  River  Elk  6 

Sport  in  Montana 8 

Return  of  White  Beaver  1 1 

Warden  From  Beaverhead 12 

Department  Personalities  14 

Fish  Historians  15 

Don't  Waste  Game  Meat 17 


COVER  PICTURE 

Governor  John  W.  Bonner  is  one 
of  the  many  thousands  of  Mon- 
tana hunters  who  enjoys  a  day 
in  the  field  with  a  good  retriev- 
er and  plenty  of  shooting.  He 
is  pictured  on  the  cover  with 
Sandy  of  Avalanche,  a  field 
trial  and  hunter.  The  yellow 
laborador  belongs  to  Lou  Babb 
of  Helena. 


Selling  Conservation 

vuesufbacLf.  '±  job 

In  every  one  of  the  48  states,  at  the 
present  time,  there  is  taking  place 
one  of  the  greatest  selling  jobs  ever 
attempted  in  this  country,  a  nation 
renowned  for  its  salesmen  and  ability 
to  sell.  It  is  a  strange  sort  of  sale 
that  is  being  made.  One  compara- 
tively small  group  of  persons  is  en- 
deavoring to  sell  the  entire  country 
on  the  idea  that  conservation  of  wild- 
life resources  is  everyone's  job. 

Initially,  the  fish  and  game  depart- 
ments of  the  various  entities  of  our 
republic  were  the  standard  bearers, 
but  close  on  their  heels  came  sports- 
men's organizations.  They  were  not 
long  in  seeing  that  the  active  partici- 
pation of  greater  numbers  of  inter- 
ested citizens  was  essential  for  the  at- 
tainment of  any  degree  of  success. 
But,  progress  is  slow  because  not 
everyone  is  a  hunter  or  fisherman, 
nor  is  everyone  concerned  with  con- 
servation as  a  means  of  making  a 
livlihood. 

Today,  however,  the  evidence  is 
piling  higher  and  higher  that  this 
job  of  selling  the  entire  populace  is 
achieving  more  success.  John  Q. 
Public,  through  constant  hammering 
by  conservation  departments  and 
outdoor  groups,  is  being  awakened 
to  the  fact  that  the  fish  in  the  waters 
and  the  game  and  birds  in  fields  and 
hills  belong  to  him.  Wildlife  re- 
sources are  the  property  of  all  of  the 
(Continued  on  page  20) 


The  Dingell-Johnson 
Bill 

Ma+Ua+tal  SUaAe 

Ten  years  from  today,  some  Mon- 
tana angler  will  roll  his  fly  line  out 
across  the  Madison  and  set  his  hook 
in  a  nice  rainbow.  Whether  he  fills 
his  creel  that  day  may  depend  a 
good  deal  on  what  his  state  does  in 
those  years  with  federal  funds  from 
the  recently  enacted  Dingell-Johnson 
bill. 

There  still  will  be  trout  in  Mon- 
tana in  1960,  whether  anything  is 
done  under  the  bill  or  not.  What  our 
mythical  Madison  angler  wants  to 
know  is  whether  he  will  be  able  to 
take  a  reasonable  catch  with  not  too 
much  time  between  bites. 

Montana's  first  step  under  the  bill 
is  state  legislative  assent.  Until  the 
last  day  of  the  1951  session  of  the 
Montana  legislature  the  bill  can  be 
put  into  effect  by  order  of  Governor 
John  W.  Bonner.  This  is  highly  de- 
sirable, for  it  will  take  that  much 
time  to  perfect  an  organization,  con- 
sidering the  current  of  well  trained 
personnel. 

The  mechanics  of  the  act  are  these: 
tackle  stores  everywhere  will  con- 
tinue to  collect  the  10%  levy  on  rods, 
creels,  reels,  and  artificial  lures  and 
baits,  but  now  the  money  will  go  to 
a  special  fund,  earmarked  for  aid  to 
sport  fishing.  Up  to  8%  will  be  held 
out  by  the  federal  Fish  and  Wildlife 
Service  for  an  overall  program, 
mainly  marine,  and  the  rest  will  be 
divided  among  the  states,  based  on 
(Continued  on  page  21) 


Your  Fish  and  Game  Commission 

Men  With  a  PuAlic  lutit 


Top  Row:     Edward  Boyes,  Thomas  Morgan,  Robert  Lambeth,  William  Carpenter. 
Bottom   Row:     A.   C.   Grande,   Jr.   and   Elmer   Johnson,    Chairman. 


As  early  as  1865,  the  law  makers 
of  the  territory  that  was  eventually 
to  become  the  State  of  Montana  were 
confronted  with  problems  in  the  field 
of  wildlife  conservation.  Even  in 
those  frontier  times,  when  the  white 
man  had  not  completely  succeeded 
in  overcoming  Indian  opposition  to 
his  invasion  of  the  virgin  hinterlands, 
far  thinking  legislators  realized  that 
the  wildlife  abundance  then  enjoyed 
by  the  populace  would  soon  be  dis- 
sipated if  proper  steps  were  not 
taken. 


Early  Day  Law 

In  the  first  session  of  the  Territorial 
Legislature,  1865,  a  law  was  enacted 
to  conserve  fish  in  the  state.  The 
law,  in  substance,  s  t  a  te  d  that 
speckled  mountain  trout  were  to  be 
taken  only  by  hook,  line  and  pole^ 
and  nets  and  seines  were  specifically 
made  illegal. 

Four  years   later,   the   shooting  of 

quail  and  partridge  was  closed  for 

three    years,    and    in    1872    the    first 

statutes  were  passed  affecting  game 

(Continued  on  page  4) 


FISH  AND  GAME  COMMISSION 

(Continued  from  page  3) 
animals.  From  February  1  to  August 
15  was  named  a  closed  season  for 
buffalo,  moose,  elk,  deer,  mountain 
sheep,  mountain  goats,  antelope  and 
hares. 

Various  acts  were  written  into  the 
Montana  law  books  for  the  protection 
of  game  but  it  was  not  until  1889, 
when  Montana  became  a  state,  that 
the  law  enforcement  end  of  conserva- 
tion was  brought  into  being  with  the 
creation  of  a  warden  force.  The  job 
of  hiring  these  men  was  left  to  the 
county  commissioners  of  each  coun- 
ty. And,  in  1895,  the  first  board  of 
fish  and  game  commissioners  was 
appointed.  Six  years  later,  W.  F. 
Scott  was  named  the  first  State  Game 
Warden. 

The  present  day  law  on  the  pow- 
ers and  duties  of  the  Commission  sets 
forth  that — "The  commission  hereby 
created  shall  have  supervision  over 
all  the  wildlife,  fish,  game  and  non- 
game  birds,  and  waterfowl,  and  the 
game  and  furbearing  animals  of  the 
state,  and  shall  possess  all  powers 
necessary  to  fulfill  the  duties  pre- 
scribed by  law  with  respect  thereto, 
and  to  bring  actions  in  the  proper 
courts  of  this  state  for  the  enforce- 
ment of  the  fish  and  game  laws  of 
the  state,  and  the  orders,  rules  and 
regulations  adopted  and  promul- 
gated by  the  commission." 

Understanding  Necessary 

A  reading  of  just  this  part  of  the 
statutes  dealing  with  the  Montana 
Fish  and  Game  Commission  gives 
one  a  starting  point  towards  a  fuller 
understanding  of  this  agency's  posi- 


tion in  affairs  of  the  state.  The  times 
and  attitudes  of  the  people  have 
changed  somewhat  down  through 
the  years  since  the  initial  attempts  at 
setting  up  an  effective  operating 
wildlife  group  were  made,  but  the 
aim  has  remained  substantially  the 
same.  The  prime  objective,  now  as 
then,  is  to  control  for  the  best  interests 
of  all  of  the  people  in  Montana  mat- 
ters pertaining  to  wildlife  preserva- 
tion, propagation,  and  protection.  It 
is  toward  this  end  that  all  effort  of 
the  Commission  is  directed 

A  recognition  by  early  day  legisla- 
tors of  the  sound  principle  that  fish 
and  game  within  the  borders  of  this 
state  are  natural  resources  to  be  pre- 
served for  the  benefit  of  all  the  peo- 
ple was  the  impetus  behind  the  first 
faltering  steps  that,  as  time  elapsed, 
became  firm  strides  in  the  direction 
of  the  present  day  fish  and  game 
management  programs.  When  the 
pioneers  crossed  the  plains,  the 
streams  were  filled  with  fish  and  the 
plains  and  hills  with  game  and  game 
birds.  Short  sighted  hunting  and 
fishing  of  a  promiscuous  nature  soon 
depleted  stocks  to  a  point  where  the 
thinking  populous  sensed  danger. 
For  instance,  in  the  area  just  north 
of  the  Capitol  City  of  Helena  one 
man  in  one  season  alone  took  over 
100  deer.  This  was  not,  even  in 
those  days,  "food  hunting"  but  could 
be  rightly  categorized  as  slaughter. 

Commission's  Power 

Delegation   of   sufficient  power   to 

administer  the  laws  passed  by  the 

local  statute  makers  with  reference 

to  fish  and  game  was  conferred  upon 

(Continued  on  page  18) 


Speaking  of  Conservation 

B*f  RoUtt  Jl.  £amUtkt  State  Quit  &  Qame.  IVaAdett 


Daring  the  past  twenty  years,  we 
have  seen  the  concept  of  manage- 
ment of  fish,  game,  and  birds  change 
from  one  of  mere  regulations  of  sea- 
son and  bag  to  one  of  intensive  man- 
agement. We  must  know  how  much 
game  a  particular  range  or  area  can 
support,  how  many  pounds  of  fish  a 
stream  will  produce,  how  much  feed 
and  cover  are  needed  to  maintain 
game  birds.  This  transition  has  be- 
come necessary  by  a  greater  land 
use  urged  on  by  ... 
an  expanding 
American  popula- 
tion and  shorter 
working  hours,  al- 
lowing more  time 
for  more  people  to 
take  advantage  of 
the  great  recrea- 
t  i  o  n  a  1  facilities. 
Game  depart- 
ments and  people 
who  participate  in 
hunting  and  fishing  have  perhaps 
both  been  slow  in  recognizing  the 
trend  toward  increased  use  of  recre- 
ational areas  and  increased  pressure 
upon  our  game  and  fish.  Both  have, 
however,  in  co-operation  with  farm- 
ers and  ranchers,  worked  diligently 
and  effectively  to  maintain  and  in- 
crease these  natural  products  of  land 
and  water.  The  part  of  the  individual 
hunter  and  fisherman  in  this  program 


is  becoming  more  important  as  time 
goes  by. 

One  important  phase  is  the  con- 
sideration of  game  law  violations. 
Laws  and  regulations  are  based 
upon  a  fair  share  for  all  consistent 
with  a  stable  breeding  stock.  An  in- 
dividual violation  by  one  person  tak- 
ing more  than  a  legal  limit  or  killing 
out  of  season  is  a  much  greater  con- 
cern than  in  years  past.  Each  oc- 
currence of  this  nature  robs  another 
of  his  rightful 
share  and  every 
effort  should  be 
made  to  stamp  out 
violations  by 
everyone  who  be- 
lieves in  a  fair 
portion  for  each. 

Great  strides 
have  been  made 
retaining  and  re- 
p  1  e  n  i  s  h  ing  our 
wildlife,  but  much 
more  remains  to  be  done.  The  task 
will  be  never  ending,  but  with  faith 
in  one  another  and  the  belief  that 
the  recreation  that  hunting  and  fish- 
ing provides  is  an  American  heri- 
tage and  must  be  retained,  we  are 
assurred  of  success. 

SPORTING  MONTANA  may  reach 
you  free  of  charge  every  three 
months  if  you  send  your  name  in 
to  us. 


SDN  RIVER 
ELK  HERD 


Bruce  Need,  veteran  game  warden,  views  the 
Sun  River  Range  —  To  him  a  dream  come  true. 


A  Jl&iA  lot,  the.  fyutwie 


By  Bob  Cooney 


The  key  to  the  future  of  any  elk 
herd  lies  in  the  winter  range.  Those 
with  adequate  winter  forage  will  sur- 
vive; those  without  are  in  constant 
danger  of  severe  losses  and  even 
possible  annihilation.  For  this  rea- 
son, the  purchase  and  development 
of  the  Sun  River  winter  game  range 
has  been  of  primary  importance.  The 
availability  of  this  range  for  elk  has 
completely  changed  the  picture  in 
that  area.  The  change  from  a  herd 
surrounded  by  almost  insurmount- 
able problems  to  one  living  upon  a 
balanced  range — perhaps  the  best 
on  this  continent — is  a  story  of  keen 
interest. 

Even  in  historic  times  the  Sun  River 
country  was  famous  for  big  game.  In- 
dian tribes  from  both  sides  of  the 
Continental  Divide  made  long  dan- 
gerous treks  into  the  area  to  secure 


their  yearly  meat  supply.  In  those 
days  game  in  vast  numbers  roamed 
the  foothills  and  prairies  adjacent  to 
the  mountains.  The  coming  of  the 
whites  drastically  changed  the  pic- 
ture. Slaughter  for  meat  and  hides 
was  the  order  of  the  day.  By  the 
turn  of  the  century  game  had  become 
scarce,  elk  being  found  only  in  small 
numbers  up  around  the  Continental 
Divide. 

A  Comeback 
In  1912  the  Sun  River  Game  Pre- 
serve was  created.  The  elk  started 
a  slow  comeback.  By  1926  they  be- 
gan to  appear  in  the  foothills  again. 
Many  changes  had  taken  place. 
Their  historic  winter  range  had  been 
for  the  most  part  taken  up  as  ranch 
land.  Notwithstanding  this,  elk  de- 
veloped a  habit  of  migrating  out  onto 
these  lands  to  winter.     Then  started 


the  difficult  and  discouraging  job  of 
attempting  to  herd  the  elk  back  into 
the  mountains.  This  went  on  for  six- 
teen winters. 

Bruce  Neal,  veteran  game  warden, 
was  in  charge  of  the  work.  Areas 
of  heavy  use  were  showing  up  back 
in  the  Forest  and  even  with  all  of  the 
herding  effort  elk  were  breaking  out 
on  private  lands  during  severe  storm 
periods. 

It  was  a  dark  picture.  There  sim- 
ply wasn't  sufficient  winter  range 
available  to  support  the  herd.  It 
looked  as  though  the  numbers  would 
have  to  be  drastically  cut.  Then  in 
1947  the  Sun  River  got  a  real  break. 
A  substantial  block  of  land  in  the 
foothills  was  listed  for  immediate 
sale.  Here  was  nearly  20,000  acres 
of  range  in  the  very  heart  of  the 
area  that  elk  had  been  vainly  at- 
tempting to  reach  during  all  of  those 

winters. 

This  acquisition  was  of  particular 
interest  as  the  land  is  located  entirely 


on  historic  winter  range.  To  the 
west  it  adjoins  the  Lewis  and  Clark 
National  Forest;  eastward  it  extends 
out  through  wooded  foothills  to  in- 
clude rolling  grassy  prairie  land. 

Minimum  Herding 

Three  winters  have  passed  since 
the  range  was  purchased  by  the 
State  Game  Commission.  During 
these  winters  large  bands  of  elk  have 
lost  little  time  in  moving  out  into  the 
foothills  soon  after  the  close  of  the 
hunting  season.  A  minimum  of  herd- 
ing has  been  required  to  keep  them 
on  their  range.  More  than  3,000  elk 
used  the  area  last  winter. 

It  has  been  interesting  to  watch 
them  grazing  over  the  foothills  and 
adjoining  prairies  during  the  winter 
time  in  a  leisurely  drifting  fashion, 
very  possibly  assuming  the  natural 
feeding  characteristics  of  their  spe- 
cies. 

A  careful  check  of  the  range  last 
spring  as  the  elk  were  moving  back 
(Continued  on  page  21) 


Migrating  elk  keep  on  the  move  to  winter  forage  lands. 


M         *''.'* 


?v 


SPORT  IN  MONTANA 

9ti  /Sup  QulineAl 

By  Ken  Thompson, 

Assistant  Director,  Wildlife  Restoration  Division 


Leaves  are  turning  into  the  reds 
and  golds  of  Indian  summer.  Moun- 
tain ranges  are  becoming  frosted 
with  the  snow  that  will  be  there  for 
the  next  several  months.  Another 
sure  sign  of  fall  is  the  nervous  twitch- 
ing of  trigger  fingers  which  becomes 
apparent  about  this  time  of  year.  All 
over  the  state  anxious  nimrods  are 
either  hunting  or  preparing  to  do  so, 
for  another  Montana  game  season  is 
just  getting  under  way. 

With  everyone  thinking  about  his 
favorite  sport  it  may  be  well  to  con- 
sider some  of  the  facts  known  about 
last  year's  season. 

The  Economical  Standpoint 

First,  from  the  standpoint  of  eco- 
nomics; the  average  resident  big 
game  hunter  spends  $65  while  the 
non-resident  expends  $385  in  quest 
of  the  several  big  game  species.  Up- 
land game  hunters  report  a  yearly 
cost  of  about  $32.  Multiplied  by  the 
number  of  hunters  in  the  state,  the 
cost  of  pursuing  game  adds  up  to  the 
considerable  sum  of  over  10,500,000 
dollars.  This  definitely  puts  the 
sport  in  the  category  of  big  business. 

However,  even  the  most  mercenary 
would  have  to  admit  that  the  chief 
value  of  hunting  is  in  the  relaxation 
and  pleasure  derived  from  tromping 

8 


the  hills  with  that  favorite  musket. 
Whether  the  preferred  firearm  is  a 
souped-up  .22  or  a  .300  Magnum  one 
can  always  get  a  good  argument 
over  the  relative  merits.  If  popular- 
ity is  any  indication,  the  30.06  is  the 
best  for  big  game  hunting;  at  any 
rate  40  per  cent  of  the  men  stopping 
at  game  checking  stations  carried 
this  caliber.  Twenty  per  cent  rely 
on  the  30.30  while  other  favorites,  the 
30.40,  300,  and  270  each  averaged 
about  seven  per  cent.  The  remain- 
ing 19  per  cent  is  composed  of  over 
40  different  calibers  of  all  makes  and 
in  various  states  of  repair. 

Gains  Popularity 

The  sport  of  seeking  wild  game 
has  become  steadily  more  popular  in 
spite  of  the  fact  that  wild  game  costs 
from  three  to  five  dollars  per  pound. 
Hunters  afield  in  this  state  have  in- 
creased tremendously  in  the  past  two 
decades.  As  an  example,  consider 
the  difference  in  big  game  hunting 
pressure.  In  1931,  24,000  hunters  pur- 
chased big  game  licenses;  this  in- 
creased to  40,000  in  1941  and  by  1949 
nearly  80,000  persons  hunted  big 
game.  Yet  the  numbers  of  big  game 
have  also  increased  so  that  hunter 
success  has  remained  about  con- 
stant. In  1949  with  the  greatest  mass 
of  hunters  ever  concentrated  in  this 


state  about  45  per  cent  successfully 
bagged  a  deer  and  15  per  cent  got 
elk. 

As  an  example  of  what  is  pro- 
duced in  the  way  of  a  big  game  har- 
vest, the  following  tabulation  lists  the 
total  big  game  kill  for  1949.  This  in- 
formation was  compiled  from  check- 
ing stations,  hunting  report  cards, 
and  by  questionaire. 

MONTANA  BIG  GAME  KILL 
1949 

Mule  Deer  23,800 

Elk 9,400 

Whitetail  Deer  8,600 

Antelope  3,250 

Mountain  Goat  160 

Moose   75 

Black  Bear  820 

Grizzly  Bear  25 

Another  important  phase  of  the 
hunting  program  is  that  of  small 
game  shooting.  A  very  large  amount 
of  upland  game  birds  and  rabbits 
are  killed  each  year.  Of  the  persons 
who  purchase  the  general  license  for 
fish  and  game  only  12  per  cent  pro- 
fess to  be  strictly  fishermen.  In  other 
words,  141,000  hunters  shoot  upland 
game  of  one  kind  or  another. 

The  yearly  take  of  this  group  car- 
best  be  shown  by  another  tabula- 
tion: 

SMALL  GAME  KILL 
1949 

Chinese  Pheasant  548,250 

Hungarian  Partridge   27,450 

Ruffed  Grouse  16,900 

Blue  Grouse  5,700 

Franklin  Grouse 2,600 

Sharptail  Grouse  20,900 

Cottontail  Rabbits  17,200 

Jack  Rabbits  15,700 


Other  interesting  facts  have  been 
accumulated  concerning  the  hunters 
of  this  state.  These  have  no  particu- 
lar relationship  to  problems  of  game 
management  but  will  answer  ques- 
tions frequently  asked  the  depart- 
ment. 

Age  classes  form  an  interesting 
comparison  for,  while  practically 
every  Montanan  from  15  to  90  is 
either  hunting  or  dreaming  of  pleas- 
ant days  afield,  the  active  hunters 
fall  into  certain  definite  age  groups: 

AGE  CLASSIFICATION  OF  LICENSE 
BUYERS 

15-19   8% 

20-29 21% 

30-39   28% 

40-49   22% 

50-59 12% 

60-69   8.2% 

70  up 0.8% 

Another  group  of  figures  which 
will  serve  to  answer  many  queries, 
is  the  occupational  classification  of 
Montana  hunters.  Logically  this 
should  follow  closely  the  same 
classes  as  are  common  to  the  state 
population.  This  is  best  shown  in 
the  following  table  which  is  taken 
from  license  stubs: 

OCCUPATIONAL  CLASSIFICATION 
OF  MONTANA  HUNTERS 

Retired  3.4% 

Housewives    3.8% 

Students 4.4% 

Professional    9.9% 

Business    11.6% 

Ranchers  <&  Farmers  23.3% 

Skilled  &  Unskilled  labor  and 

others  43.6% 

(Continued  on  page  20) 

9 


THE  RETURN  OF  THE 
WHITE  BEAVER 

nat  da  wild  a  abeam 


Maybe  you  know  or  have  heard 
of  Howard  Campbell,  State  Trapper. 
Anyway,  Howard  has  trapped  about 
every  kind  of  animal  there  is  to  trap 
in  this  section  of  the  United  States. 
But  his  specialty  is  beaver.  'Got  a 
beaver  you  want  trapped — Ho  ward' 11 
get  him  every  time,  using  his  own 
self-devised  methods,  which  can't 
exactly  be  called  pseudoscientific — 
they're  just  Howard  Campbell  spe- 
cials, application  of  practical-  down- 
to-earth  science.  But  he  had  a  very 
special  experience  early  this  year 
which  has  heightened  and  directed 
his  trapping  career  along  new  chan- 
nels. 

It  happened  the  morning  he  set  out 
to  inspect  his  beaver  traps  on  Miner 
Creek  in  the  Big  Hole.  The  Fish  and 
Game  Department  had  received  a 
complaint  about  troublesome  beaver 
in  that  vicinity  and  had  sent  Howard 
to  trap  them. 

As  he  approached  the  traps,  he 
was  pleased  to  note  that  the  first 
one  had  a  catch  —  but  something 
startlingly  different  about  this  crea- 
ture caught  his  astonished  eye.    This 

Howard  Campbell  holds  up  one  of  his 
<  («((         prize  white  beaver  pelts. 


beaver,  if  beaver  it  was,  was  almost 
white!  Each  of  the  remaining  traps 
yielded  a  companion  to  the  first,  un- 
til Howard  had  seven  all-told. 

White  Spots 

White  beaver  —  he  certainly  had 
heard  about  them,  that  they  were  ex- 
tinct, but  long  ago  were  a  reality.  A 
fellow  trapper  had  told  him  of  having 
caught  unusual  beaver  with  white 
spots,  and  wasn't  it  the  white  spots 
and  light  color  of  the  fur  that  had  first 
caught  his  own  eye?  Later,  after 
pelting  the  animals  (at  which  he  is 
an  expert  from  the  word  "go")  he 
discovered  that  these  beaver  had  a 
different  structure  from  most,  and  that 
even  the  texture  of  the  fur  was  dif- 
ferent. The  skeltons  he  saved  for 
further  scientific  study. 

He  learned  that  his  guess  had 
been  right — they  were  beaver  of  the 
white  variety,  but  they  were,  of 
course,  not  pure  white  beaver.  Even 
so,  it  gave  the  trapper  a  real  thrill, 
and  when  he  was  asked  how  he  felt 
about  his  find,  he  said: 

The  Long  Search 

"Why,  when  I  discovered  them  in 
my  traps,  I  felt  something  like  a  pros- 
continued  on  page  22) 

11 


The  Warden  from  Beaverhead  County 


By  Lorraine  D.  Kurfiss 


Assistant  Director  Public  Information 


Somewhere  in  Beaverhead  Coun- 
ty, by  a  good  fishing  hole,  or  a 
grassy  clump  under  a  towering  pine 
tree  there's  a  spot  which  Charlie 
Price  has  picked  out  as  his  own  pri- 
vate sanctuary  where  he  can  sit  and 
reminisce. 

In  the  summertime  25  years  ago, 
Charlie  Price  began  his  long  career 
as  a  Deputy  Game  Warden  in  Bea- 
verhead county.  Last  August  1,  he 
retired,  the  oldest  warden  to  contrib- 
ute unbroken  service  to  Montana's 
Department  of  Fish  and  Game. 

The  fields  and  forest  of  the  Bea- 
verhead were  his  back  yard,  its  wild- 
life creatures  his  pets,  and  the  mind- 
ful hunter,   his  friend.     Everyone  in 

Charlie  shows  off  a  prize  catch. 


the  county,  with  few  exceptions, 
knows  Charlie.  Maybe  they  first  en- 
countered him  when  he  checked  their 
fishing  licenses  in  the  Big  Hole,  or 
when  he  was  on  the  trail  of  a  culprit 
who  was  reported  spotlighting  deer. 
Maybe  he  didn't  know  it  the  first 
day  of  work,  but  from  then  on,  Char- 
lie was  one  of  Mother  Nature's  right- 
hand  men.  It  was  up  to  him  to  see 
that  the  streams  were  well  stocked 
with  fish,  but  not  with  more  than  they 
could  feed;  he  had  to  erect  scare- 
crows to  protect  farmers'  crops  from 
complete  devastation  by  hungry 
fowls;  and  he  had  to  separate  an  elk 
from  a  haystack  when  it  was  evident 
that  the  two  had  mixed. 

The  Waste 

Charlie  has  good  reason  to  stress 
the  importance  of  conserving  wild- 
life. He  can  remember  the  days  be- 
fore a  possession  limit  was  set  for 
ducks. 

"That  was  a  terrible  waste  and  ex- 
ploitation of  ducks,"  he  said,  "when 
the  hunters  would  go  on  a  two-week 
hunt,  and  maybe  have  20  ducks  at 
the  end  of  the  first  day.  You  could 
just  figure  on  at  least  twenty  birds 
being  spoiled  by  the  end  of  the  ex- 
cursion." 

That  was  the  period  when  Mon- 
tana's   wildlife    was    more    plentiful, 


12 


but  on  the  brink  of  a  serious  to  dan- 
gerous decline. 

In  this  years,  Beaverhead  coun- 
ty had  the  alarmingly  low  number 
of  50  head  of  antelope  left  to  exist 
on  its  bounteous  ranges.  In  the 
Blacktail  country,  startling  though  it 
may  seem,  there  were  no  elk  at  all. 
Predators,  long,  hungry  winters,  and 
myriad  hunters  each  season  had  re- 
duced their  numbers  to  dwindling 
herds. 

There  was  a  lot  to  do  in  that  terri- 
tory when  Charlie  added  his  name  to 
the  pay  roll  of  the  Fish  and  Game  De- 
partment. But  he  rolled  up  his 
sleeves  and  looked  the  sparse  wild- 
life situation  square  in  its  guant  face. 
He  was  Beaverhead  county's  only 
game  warden,  and,  fortunately,  he 
had  married  a  very  able  assistant. 
Mrs.  Price  has  been  his  secretary 
and  all-around  aid  for  lo  these  many 
years. 

Streams  Stocked 

The  fisherman  who  thinks  that  the 
best  fishing  holes  in  many  of  the 
Beaverhead's  lakes  and  streams 
have  always  been  there  waiting  to 
be  fished  has  overestimated  Mother 
Nature.  Miles  of  these  waters  had 
never  seen  a  fish  until  Charlie 
stocked  them.  Sometimes  he  had  to 
pack  in  on  foot  or  horseback  into 
virgin  wilderness  where  an  automo- 
bile dared  not  tread.  Being  a  war- 
den had  its  heartbreaks,  too,  when 
sometimes  his  finicky  marine  passen- 
gers survived  a  tough  pack-trip  only 
to  die  shortly  after  having  been 
planted  in  the  strange  waters  of  their 
new  homes.  But  in  his  quarter-cen- 
tury of  service,  Charlie  has  stocked 


This  crippled  elk  refused  flatly  to  leave. 

millions  of  fish  to  help  make  the  wild- 
erness into  the  now  heavily  visited 
fisherman's  haven  which  has  given 
it  a  real  name  in  the  sports  world. 

Shortly  after  he  retired  in  August, 
Charlie  was  asked  to  specify  what 
part  of  his  job  he  had  liked  most.  He 
scratched  his  head,  thought  a  mo- 
ment, and  then  said: 

"Well,  I  liked  all  the  phases  of  it, 
but  I  think  maybe  I  enjoyed  live- 
trapping  beaver,  planting  fish,  and 
meeting  people  the  best." 

And  he  made  a  lot  of  friends,  too. 

Rancher's  Helper 

"One  day,"  he  said,  "  a  rancher 
called  me  and  asked  me  to  come  to 
his  place.  It  seems  that  months  ago 
he  found  an  elk  by  one  of  his  hay- 
stacks. It  had  a  broken  leg,  and  he 
felt  sorry  for  the  poor  thing,  so  he  de- 
cided to  let  him  stay  until  he  found 
it  necessary  to  use  the  hay.  He  even 
built  a  pole  fence  around  the  elk 
(Continued  on  page  19) 


13 


^eptf/dmetit  PeMxui&lvti&l: 


The  Women  Who  Help 


The  sporting  world  may  belong  to 
the  men,  but  women  play  a  large 
part  in  the  functioning  of  the  Fish 
and  Game  Department  as  stenos, 
junior  clerks,  typists,  bookkeepers, 
etc. 

Now  meet  Bev,  the  gal  who  is- 
sues trappers  permits.  Some  of  you 
who  are  trapping  your  own  trouble- 
some beaver  have  dealt  with  Bev 
to  get  your  per- 
mits. 

Her  full  name  is 
Mrs.  Beverly  Hil- 
ger,  age  24.  When 
she  and  her  hus- 
band Bob  decided 
to  get  married, 
nothing  could  stop 
them.  Not  the 
thousand  miles  of 
distance  which 
stretched  between 
them — nor  even  World  War  II.  It 
was  back  in  1945  when  Bob  was  sta- 
tioned at  an  air  base  in  Texas,  so 
Bev,  just  out  of  high  school,  packed 
her  trousseau  in  a  suitcase  and  flew 
south  to  marry  her  soldier  boy-friend. 

Theirs  is  the  story  of  striving  suc- 
cess. In  the  five  years  of  their  mar- 
riage  they  have  made  plans  for  a 

14 


9ntnxiduci+Uf  lieu: 

dream  house  where  their  little  four- 
year-old  daughter  Linda  may  have 
a  room  of  her  own.  Now  that  little 
house  is  a  reality  to  be  completed 
by  Christmas.  Though  they  both 
work,  their  budget  doesn't  allow 
carpenters,  so  Bob,  after  a  hard 
day's  work,  builds  their  house  by 
night,  while  Bev,  with  Linda's  aid, 
olans  the  inside  furnishings  and  helps 
with  odd  jobs. 

During  her  lunch 
hour,  Bev  often 
dashes  down  town 
to  pick  up  some 
pipefittings,  or  rent 
a  floor  sander. 
Then,  after  work, 
she  picks  Linda  up 
at  the  nursery 
school,  and  hurries 
home  to  cook  din- 
ner. 

She's  a  good  cook,  too,  and,  being 
around  the  Fish  and  Game  Depart- 
ment gives  her  plenty  of  opportunity 
to  learn  the  best  ways  of  preparing 
wild  meat. 

Says  Bev,  "It's  fun  to  work  when 
you're  working  for  something  good — 
and  especially  when  you're  em- 
ployed by  the  Montana  Fish  and 
Game  Department." 


FISH  HISTORIANS  — 

Collect  2>ala  fey  SUocJuHf  Sbi&anti 


From  a  Report  by  C.  K.  Phenici 

Fisheries   Biologist 


It's  hard  enough  to  write  a  history 
of  human  beings,  but  to  follow  the 
life  of  a  fish  and  record  it  is  a  big 
job  any  way  you  look  at  it.  But  it's 
being  done,  and  the  fish  hsitory  is 
becoming  more  accurate  each  year. 

Migration,  food  habits,  growth,  and 
age  have  to  be  determnied  some 
way,  and  the  Fish  and  Game  Depart- 
ment thinks  the  "shocking"  method 
is  the  best. 

Probably  the  best  example  of 
stream  sampling  by  this  method  is 
the  Prickly  Pear  Creek  Project.  It 
was  begun  in  the  summer  of  1949  for 
a  detailed  study  of  the  fish  popula- 
tions of  Prickly  Pear  creek  near  Wolf 
Creek,  Montana,  by  a  five-man  crew 
headed  by  Frank  Stefanich  who  is 
a  "Prickly  Pear"  boy  in  the  summer, 
and  a  graduate  student  at  Montana 
State  College  in  the  winter. 

The  other  crewmen,  students,  also, 
are  Vern  Craig,  graduate,  and  Jack 
Bailey,  Jim  Ready,  and  Bill  Alvord. 
Random   Sampling 

The  portion  of  the  creek  from  the 
Missouri  River  to  Sieben  was  desig- 
nated as  the  study  area.  Six  600- 
foot  sections  were  selected  at  random 
for  sampling,  and  each  section  was 
seined  and  shocked  with  electrodes. 
Stunned,  the  fish  were  netted  and  put 
in  screen  cages  near  the  bank  of  the 


river  until  all  the  fish  in  that  section 
were  taken.  Then,  one  by  one,  the 
captives  were  dunked  in  urethane  to 
put  them  to  sleep  after  which  they 
were  weighed,  measured,  scaled, 
tagged,  then  were  released  un- 
harmed into  the  section  from  whence 
they  came. 

A  census  was  then  made  of  each 
section  four  times  in  1949,  and  three 
times  since  May  of  this  year  in  an  ef- 
fort to  collect  all  the  fish  from  each 

After   being   drugged,   the   fish  are 

weighed,     measured,     scaled,    and 

tagged.     "This  one's   IIV2  inches," 

says  Frank  Stefanich. 


15 


section.  The  dwellers  of  the  stream 
were  trout,  whitefish,  suckers,  carp, 
ling  and  skulfins.  Records  were 
made  of  all  fish  caught  that  had 
been  tagged  on  previous  shockings. 
The  findings  will  show  the  fisheries 
biologists  how  to  aproach  other 
stream  studies.  When  some  of  the 
problems  on  trout  streams  are  ans- 
wered by  this  experiment,  fisheries 
should  be  able  to: 

*Establish  the  size  of  the  sample 
needed  to  measure  the  abundance  of 
trout  and  the  fluctuation  of  abund- 
ance in  streams  of  average  size.  This 
would  cut  the  size  of  the  experiment 
down  as  far  as  possible  and  still  pro- 
vide an  over-all  picture. 

*  Learn  the  size  of  the  Prickly  Pear 
Creek  trout  population  along  with  its 
length,  weight,  age,  and  species  com- 
position. 


Two  of  the  Prickley  Pear  boys  clean 
the  nets. 

*  Learn  the  size  sample  needed  in 
streams  to  measure  adequately  the 
growth  rate  of  fishes  and  to  measure 
the  mortality  rates,  both  of  which  are 
extremely  important  in  fishery  man- 
agement. 


*  Study  the  angler's  catch  as  it  re- 
lates to  the  estimated  size  and  com- 
position of  the  trout  population. 

*  Measure  the  movement  or  dis- 
persion of  trout. 

*  Study  under  conditions  that  can 
be  controlled  the  relation  between 
the  various  species  of  trout. 

*  Establish  the  reality  of  sucker  mi- 
gration and  to  measure  its  magnitude 
and  direction. 

*  Study  the  survival  of  hatchery- 
reared  trout  in  a  stream  where  the 
size  of  the  wild  population  can  be  es- 
timated and  controlled. 

*Find  and  study  the  portions  of  the 
stream  where  trout  are  most  numer- 
ous. 

*  Learn  the  types  of  stream  im- 
provement that  may  be  used  in  Mon- 
tana waters. 

*Test  the  effectiveness  of  stream 
improvement. 

The  importance  of  environment 
to  maximum  production  has  already 
been  demonstrated.  During  the  1949 
season,  an  average  of  13.5  pounds 
of  trout  per  150  feet  of  stream  was  re- 
moved with  the  electric  shocker  from 
sections  with  one  or  more  medium 
sized  pools.  On  the  other  hand,  only 
an  average  of  3.4  pounds  of  trout  per 
150  feet  of  stream  was  resident  in 
those  sections  with  100  per  cent  riffles 
or  small  pools  and  riffles.  Approxi- 
mately three-quarters  of  this  stream 
is  in  the  low  production  category. 
Experiments  are  under  way  to  de- 
termine the  feasibility  of  increasing 
production  by  artificial  stream  im- 
provement.— L.  K. 


16 


Don  t  Waste  --  pur  game  meat 


So  you  got  your  deer! 

Even  so,  it  is  much  too  early  to  be 
self-satisfied  to  the  point  where  you 
figure  it's  all  over  but  the  eating. 
What  if  you  quti  conserving  your 
game  the  minute  fired  the  fatal  shot? 
You'd  soon  find  that  proper  care  goes 
beyond  killing  the  animal  and  drag- 
ging him  out  of  the  hills. 

First  of  all,  for  the  cleanest  kill, 
game  should  be  shot  as  close  to  the 
heart  as  possible,  then  dressed  out 


at  once  to  avoid  spoil  from  the  body 
heat.  Without  puncturing  the  intes- 
tines, slit  him  from  the  breastbone  to 
the  base  of  the  tail.  Cut  around  the 
vent  and  pull  in,  and  roll  out  the 
viscera  (that  means  intestines),  and 
cut  the  gullet  loose  and  drain  it. 

Next,  it  is  important  that  the  empty 
body  cavity  be  wiped  clean  and 
dry.     Then  hang  him  up,  propping 

the  body  cavity  open.     During  the 
(Continued  on  page  23) 


NECK- 

MINCEMEAT 
Me/VTB^Lt.* 
5T6.W      OH, 


CHUCK 

ROAST 


SADbLH 


LOIN 


RUMP 


ROttST 


SHOULDER 


ROAST 


MEAT    ftfV-LS 


5  PARE  RIBS 


OONeO      AND 

OROSE      LIKE 
FLRNK 


FLANK 

QR.OIL,  STEW. 
RACiOOT 
HftMSURCiER 


HAUNCH 


STEAKS 


17 


FISH  AND  GAME  COMMISSION 

(Continued  from  page  4) 

the  Montana  Fish  and  Game  Com- 
mission. And,  today,  this  agency, 
cinsisting  of  five  men  from  different 
specified  districts,  directs  the  destin- 
ies of  this  state's  wildlife. 

Headed  by  Elmer  Johnson,  a  resi- 
dent of  Glasgow,  the  Commission 
meets  once  a  month  in  Helena  to 
pass  on  the  numerous  questions  that 
arise  relative  to  the  field  it  controls. 
Surprisingly  few  citizens  appreciate 
the  fact  that  these  men  receive  no 
monetary  return  for  their  efforts,  other 
than  the  bare  expenses  they  incur 
traveling  to  and  from  the  meeting 
place.  Their  time,  taken  from  their 
own  private  businesses,  and  their  ex- 
perience in  wildlife  matters  gleaned 
from  years  in  the  field  and  in  deal- 
ings with  sports  enterprises,  are  don- 
ated free  of  charge. 

The  Governor  of  the  state  appoints 
members  of  the  Commission,  when 
vacancies  occur,  for  terms  of  four 
years.  By  statute,  the  importance  of 
any  political  affiliation  of  a  consid- 
ered candidate  for  such  'an  appoint- 
ment is  specifically  excluded.  But, 
the  law  does  insist  that  he  be  inter- 
ested and  experienced  in  the  subjects 
of  wildlife,  fish  and  game  before  he 
is  eligible. 

The  5  Districts 

The  five  districts  set  up  are  as  fol- 
lows: 

District  1.  Lincoln,  Flathead,  San- 
ders, Lake,  Mineral,  Missoula,  Pow- 
ell, Ravalli,  Granite  and  Lewis  and 
Clark.  Edward  M.  Boyes  of  Libby  is 
the  delegate  from  this  district. 


District  2.  Deer  Lodge,  Silver  Bow, 
Beaverhead,  Madison,  Jefferson, 
Broadwater,  Gallatin,  Park  and 
Sweetgrass.  William  Carpenter  of 
Butte  represents  District  2  on  the 
Commisison. 

District  3.  Glacier,  Toole,  Liberty, 
Hill,  Pondera,  Teton,  Chouteau,  Cas- 
cade, Judith  Basin,  Fergus,  Blaine, 
Meagher,  and  Wheatland.  These  13 
Montana  political  subdivisions  are 
the  jurisdiction  of  A.  C.  Grande,  Jr., 
of  Lennep. 

District  4.  Phillips,  Valley,  Dan- 
iels, Sheridan,  Roosevelt,  Petroleum, 
Garfield,  McCone,  Richland,  Dawson 
and  Wibaux.  Chairman  Johnson 
speaks  at  Commission  meetings  for 
this  section. 

District  5.  Golden  Valley,  Mussel- 
shell, Stillwater,  Carbon,  Yellow- 
stone, Big  Horn,  Treasure,  Rosebud, 
Custer,  Powder  River,  Carter,  Fallon, 
and  Prairie.  From  Miles  City,  Thomas 
S.  Morgan  makes  the  monthly  trip  to 
attend  for  this  area. 

The  rules  and  regulations  which 
the  commission  pass  on  would  be 
wasted  effort  if  it  were  not  for  an 
executive  member  of  the  board  who 
sees  them  into  being.  This  is  the 
funciton,  or  one  of  the  functions,  of 
State  Game  Warden  Robert  H.  Lam- 
beth. His  official  title  is  that  of  Sec- 
retary of  the  Commission.  He  is  a 
full  time  employee  of  the  Depart- 
ment, and  oversees  the  working  of 
all  sections  at  all  times.  Because  of 
his  vast  experience  in  the  field  of  fish 
and  game  law  enforcement,  he  is 
well  qualified  to  give  opinions  and 
make  suggestions  during  the  course 


18 


of  Commission  gatherings. 

A  Finger  on  the  Pulse 

Reports  from  district  warden  super- 
visors, deputy  game  wardens,  and 
special  project  groups  in  the  field 
keep  the  Commission's  finger  on  the 
fish  and  game  pulse  of  the  state. 
Over-populations  of  various  types  of 
game  in  certain  areas  have  to  be 
coped  with  as  well  as  the  more  com- 
monly experienced  scarcities,  and  it 
is  the  Commission's  job  to  see  that 
every  person  purchasing  a  Montana 
fishing  permit  gets  his  three  dollars 
worth  of  fishing  thrills  by  keeping  all 
streams  and  lakes  well  stocked  with 
fish  most  suited  to  the  peculiarities 
of  the  water  concerned. 

It  is  a  big  job  that  the  legislature 
has  delegated  to  this  small  group  of 
men.  Unlike  other  state  agencies  in 
Montana,  the  Fish  and  Game  Depart- 
ment receives  no  appropriations  from 
the  legislature.  It  is  a  self  sustaining 
entity  within  the  complex  state  struc- 
ture. Operating  funds  for  the  De- 
partment are  derived  from  the  sale  of 
sporting  licenses,  trapping  licenses, 
sale  of  confiscated  furs,  and  fines. 

Co-Operation — Sought  and  Got 

The  administration  of  this  wildlife 
trust  for  the  people  of  Montana  re- 
quires not  only  ability  to  meet  pres- 
ent needs  but  vision  sufficient  to 
recognize  future  problems.  It  has 
been  a  source  of  satisfaction  to  the 
Commission  to  observe  the  unlimited 
co-operation  of  both  individual  sports- 
ment  and  organized  outdoor  clubs, 
which  individuals  and  clubs  have 
come  to  realize  that  their  own  actions 
and  suggestions  can  assist  the  Com- 


mission in  seeing  through  to  a  suc- 
cessful end  the  enormous  task  set  be- 
fore it. 

Montana  has  been  justly  named 
"a  sportsman's  paradise."  It  will 
continue  to  have  this  title  so  long  as 
the  Montana  Fish  and  Game  Com- 
mission has  anything  to  say  about  it. 

THE  WARDEN  FROM  BEAVERHEAD 

(Continued  from  page  13) 

and  the  stack  to  assure  the  creature 
of  privacy. 

"In  the  meantime,  the  elk's  leg 
healed  and  the  farmer  was  down  to 
his  last  stack,  but  try  as  he  would, 
he  could  not  make  the  animal  leave. 
He  would  just  run  around  and 
around  the  haystack." 

Well,  Charlie  silently  eyed  the  situ- 
ation for  a  minute,  then  walked  over 
to  the  fence,  stuck  the  end  of  one  of 
the  fence  poles  into  the  stack  and 
when  the  elk  ran  around  again,  he 
naturally  diverted  and  ran  out 
through  the  opening  in  the  fence.  The 
farmer  was  astounded.  Why  hadn't 
he  thought  of  a  simple  Lhing  like 
that? 

Charlie  has  a  millon  stories  to  tell 
about  his  experiences  as  a  game 
warden,  and,  though  he  isn't  the  type 
of  person  to  dwell  on  his  own  tales, 
he  can  easily  be  lured  into  conversa- 
tions when  wildlife  is  the  topic.  He 
likes  to  tell  about  the  buffalo  he  shot 
for  Herman  Peterson  who  wanted 
one  of  his  herd  for  a  banquet.  It  was 
his  first  buffalo,  and  he  was  as 
thrilled  as  a  kid  with  his  first  fish. 

What  a  far-cry  1950  is  from  1925. 
(Continued  on  page  20) 


19 


THE  WARDEN  FROM  BEAVERHEAD 

(Continued  from  page  19) 
Pride  is  hardly  the  word  to  describe 
the  expression  in  Charlie's  eyes 
when  he  reports  that  the  Beaverhead 
now  has  1,335  antelope,  over  1,300 
elk,  and  a  good  waterfowl  and  resi- 
dent bird  population,  not  to  mention 
the  fish — that  long — which  anglers 
make  up  stories  about.  No,  pride 
isn't  the  word.  Maybe  it's  merely 
the  expression  of  satisfaction  over  a 
job  well  done. 

SELLING  CONSERVATION 

(Continued  from  page  2) 

people  and  not  of  the  hunting  and 
fishing  public  alone.  These  resources 
amount  to  a  national  trust  adminis- 
tered by  state  agencies  for  universal 
benefit. 

In  Montana,  your  Fish  and  Game 
Department  keeps  the  contsant  vigil. 
It,  along  with  interested  organiza- 
tions, is  doing  this  state's  job  of  sell- 
ing the  people  of  the  Treasure  State, 
not  what  is  already  our  own,  but 
the  idea  that  each  and  every  man, 
woman,  and  child  has  a  valuable  in- 
terest in  the  wild  things  that  thrive 
here.  This  interest  should  not  be 
abused,  as  it  so  often  is,  by  thought- 
less acts. 

We  must  sell  and  be  sold.  And, 
when  we  have  been  firmly  and  ir- 
revocably convinced,  let  us  then, 
conservation-wise,  start  operating  in 
the  black  and  throw  away  the  red 
ink  that  has  smeared  the  picture  on 
our  wildlife  ledger. 

J.R. 


SPORT  IN  MONTANA 

(Continued  from  page  9) 
There  we  have  looked  at  the  Mon- 
tana hunter,  his  business,  his  pocket- 
book,  his  age,  and  what  he  shoots. 
Occaisonally  one  of  this  group  will 
grumble  about  the  non-resident  hun- 
ter, whom  he  blames  for  his  poor 
luck.  Actually  less  than  one  per  cent 
of  the  total  deer  kill  is  by  out-of-state 
hunters  and  they  take  less  than  3  per 
cent  of  the  elk.  These  figures  show 
that  only  a  fraction  of  the  game 
killed  is  by  the  non-resident  while 
he  contributes  a  substantial  part  of 
the  money  spent  on  the  sport. 
Fodder  for  Fights 
That  about  rounds  up  the  hunting 
story  and  while  this  article  has  been 
a  little  heavy  with  statistics,  which 
are  always  dull,  it  should  at  least 
provide  fodder  for  the  campfire  and 
hot  stove  leagues  to  argue  over. 
Much  of  this  information  could  have 
been  obtained  only  through  the  co- 
operation of  thousands  of  Montana 
hunters  who  stopped  at  checking  sta- 
tions or  answered  long  questionaires. 
In  addition  to  the  above  facts,  the 
Wildlife  Resoraion  division  which 
has  been  assigned  the  job  of  con- 
ducting this  operation,  has  a  consid- 
erable volume  of  game  weights  and 
measurements.  These  show  the  age, 
classes,  and  size  of  game  harvested 
and  are  valuable  for  the  game  man- 
agement program. 

Many  facts  needed  must  be  proved 
by  the  hunter,  who  is  on  the  consum- 
er end  of  game  production.  The  de- 
partment wishes  to  thank  all  who 
have  co-operated  in  the  past  and 
earnestly  to  request  further  help  this 


20 


fall  when  effort  will  again  be  made 
to  gather  material  for  examination 
and  information  on  the  annual  hunter 
kill. 

Montana  has  a  variety  of  game  un- 
equalled in  the  country  and  enough 
to  provide  all  with  a  fair  chance  of 
success.  To  maintain  what  we  have 
we  must  remember  that  good  man- 
age ment  and  wise  utilization  of  that 
resource  must  be  based  on  facts  and 
not  guesses. 

SUN  RIVER  ELK  HERD 

(Continued  from  page  7) 
into  the  mountains  showed  only  mod- 
erate use  of  the  grass-type  forage. 
The  winter  loss  was  very  light  and 
confined  entirely  to  old  animals. 

The  influence  of  the  Sun  River 
Range  extends  even  across  the  Con- 
tinental Divide.  Heavily-used  trails 
during  the  past  several  falls  have  in- 
dicated a  significant  drift  of  elk  from 
the  South  Fork  and  Middle  Fork  of 
the  Flathead  and  on  to  the  range  in 
the  foothills.  A  return  drift  has  been 
noted  in  the  spring. 

The  ranchers  in  the  area  are  well 
pleased.  They  are  no  longer  both- 
ered by  large  bands  of  elk;  those  that 
do  apear  are  quickly  moved  on  to 
the  Game  Range. 
Bruce  Need — His  Dream  Come  True 

Let's  look  for  a  moment  through  the 
eyes  of  a  man  who  has  spent  a  life- 
time with  the  Sun  River  elk.  To  Bruce 
Neal,  the  Game  Range  is  in  reality  a 
dream  come  true.  As  manager  of 
the  area  he  is  now  able  to  apply  a. 
vast  fund  of  knowledge  acquired  by 
working  so  closely  with  game 
through  the  years.     It  is  not  difficult 


to  realize  the  satisfaction  that  he  must 
get  in  drifting  the  elk  onto  their  own 
ranges  after  years  of  pushing  them 
back  into  the  deep  snows  of  the 
mountains. 

There  is  one  cloud  in  an  otherwise 
perfect  picture.  A  dam  has  been 
proposed  on  the  Sun  River  in  the 
mountains  to  the  west  of  the  Game 
Range.  Concern  is  felt  that  the  re- 
sulting impoundment  would  form  a 
block  to  the  outward  movement  of 
elk.  Should  it  be  built,  it  is  very- 
possible  that  elk  would  find  alternate 
migration  trails,  thus  bringing  them 
to  the  foothills  far  to  the  north  or  to 
the  south  of  the  Game  Range.  In  ad- 
dition, much  of  the  important  calving 
range  for  the  herd  would  be  flooded. 
New  roads  necessary  for  the  con- 
struction would  very  possibly  bring 
about  serious  "firing-line"  conditions. 
We  hope  that  this  problem  may  be 
worked  out  satisfactorily. 

For  the  time  being,  at  least,  we  are 
counting  our  blessings  and  getting 
real  satisfaction  out  of  handling  at 
least  one  herd  of  elk  when  we  have 
all  the  tools  to  work  with. 

DINGELL-JOHNSON  BILL 

(Continued  from  page  2) 
a  formula  which  gives  40%  weight 
to  area  and  60%  to  ratio  of  fishing 
license  holders  to  total  population. 
Montana's  original  share  is  estimat- 
ed to  be  about  $110,000. 

Projects  to  be  developed  then  will 
be  worked  out  by  the  state  Fish  and 
Game  Department  and  federal  Fish 
and  Wildlife  Service,  with  the  fed- 
erals putting  up  75%  and  the  state 
(Continued  on  page  22) 


21 


DINGELL-JOHNSON  BILL 

(Continued  from  page  21) 
25%  of  the  money.  After  July  1, 
1953,  up  to  25%  of  allocations  from 
federal  funds  may  be  used  for  proj- 
ect maintenance.  All  projects  will 
belong  to  the  state  of  Montana  when 
completed.  Any  unexpended  bal- 
ances go  back  to  the  federal  fund 
for  research  work  on  fish. 

Projects,  to  be  approved  by  the 
Secretary  of  the  Interior,  through  the 
Fish  and  Wildlife  Service,  must  be 
"substantial  in  character  and  de- 
sign" and  the  secretary  has  the  last 
say  on  project  standards.  These 
projects  may  include:  research  on 
fish  management  and  culture  prob- 
lems necessary  to  efficient  adminis- 


tration of  fish  resources;  findings  of 
fact  needed  to  guide  and  direct  regu- 
lation of  fishing,  including  fish  popu- 
lationsh,  drain  of  fish  supplies,  and 
natural  causes;  plans  for  restocking 
waters  according  to  natural  areas 
and  fact  finding  for  the  purpose  of 
making  those  plans  and  testing  the 
efficiency  of  the  plans;  restoration, 
selection,  rehabilitation  and  improve- 
ment of  areas  of  either  water  or  land 
for  hatching,  feeding,  resting,  and 
breeding  places  for  fish.  Acquisition 
of  these  tracts  by  purchase,  condem- 
nation, lease  or  gift  is  provided  in  the 
law  as  well  as  construction  on  the 
sites  of  any  building  or  other  struc- 
ture needed  to  carry  out  the  pro- 
visions. 


RETURN  OF  WHITE  BEAVER 

(Continued  from  page  1 1) 
pector  must  feel  when  he  suddenly 
picks  up  a  small  nugget  after  a  long 
search  for  gold.  Yet,  I  was  thrilled, 
because  I  have  looked  a  long  time 
for  some  trace  of  the  now  extinct 
white  beaver  in  the  state  of  Montana. 
Where  the  beaver  we  pelted  came 
from,  I  don't  know,  unless  they  are  a 
colony  all  their  own." 

But  even  if  Campbell  did  know 
where  they  came  from,  five-11  get  you 
ten  that  he  wouldn't  tell  a  breathing 
soul.  He  wants  them  himself  for  a 
special  purpose  which  is  forming 
slowly  in  the  back  of  his  mind;  he 
wants  to  breed  them  back  to  their 
original  white  state,  and  he  doesn't 
want  them  to  be  heedlessly  exploited 
until  he  gets  to  try  his  luck.  He 
knows  what  it  means — careful  live- 
trapping,    expert  handling,    a   lot   of 


time,  and  lots  of  disappointments. 

What  happened  to  the  seven 
"white"  beaver  pelts?  Well,  they 
were  sold  for  $12  apiece,  and  were 
bought  by  Leo  M.  Goldberg,  clothier 
and  furrier  of  Helena.  Since  there 
weren't  enough  for  a  coat,  they  were 
destined  to  be  used  for  trimming. 

Campbell  is  valuable  not  only  to 
the  Fish  and  Game  Department,  but 
was  a  priceless  aid  last  year  to  Walt 
Disney  who  came  to  Montana  to  do 
a  featurette  on  the  state's  wildlife 
called  "Beaver  Valley"  which  was 
filmed  in  technicolor.  Howard 
trapped  and  maneuvered  beaver  so 
as  to  make  the  filming  of  the  elusive 
little  animal  possible.  Critics  have 
labeled  the  production  as  "excel- 
lent." He  worked  for  three  months, 
what  time  he  could  spare,  with  the 
Disney  photographers,  then  when  he 


22 


got  his  big  chance  to  meet  Disney, 
he  was  all  tied  up  in  work  and 
couldn't  make  it.  Perhaps,  though, 
he'll  have  another  chance  sometime, 


if  he  ever  breeds  white  beaver  back, 
and  providing  they're  photogenic. 

"Oh   well,"    Howard    says,    "we'll 
see." 


In  June,  the  Department  sold  these  furs  at  an  auction.     Ovie  Wolverton, 
Chief  Clerk,  stops  counting  pelts  long  enough  to  have  his  picture  taken. 


DON'T  WASTE  GAME  MEAT 

(Continued  from  page  17) 
skinning  operation,  be  sure  to  cut  off 
the  loose  meat.    Cut  the  neck  at  the 
base  of  the  skull,   give  the  head  a 
twist,  and  remove  it. 

The  diagram  shown  is  one  of  many 
ways  to  cut  up  your  game.  Saw  the 
carcass  in  half  down  the  middle  of 
the  back,  and  start  cutting  in  sections 
from  there.  According  to  the  size 
of  your  family,  wrap  enough  meat 
for  one  meal  in  waxed  paper  pack- 
ages, lable  it,  and  put  in  cold  stor- 
age. Do  not  thaw  meat  out  until  you 
are  ready  to  use  it.  After  these  pre- 
cautions have  been  taken,  be  sure  to 


use  your  game  meat  before  the  open- 
ing of  the  season  next  year  if  you 
wish  to  bag  another  animal. 

Now,  if  the  buck  you  bagged  was 
a  big  one,  chances  are  that  you  and 
the  family  will  get  a  little  tired  of 
your  deer  steaks,  roasts,  boils,  and 
stews.  If  that  is  the  case,  you've 
missed  out  on  the  real  delicacies  ot 
game  meat.  'Ever  taste  smoked, 
pickled,  dried,  or  canned  venison? 
Well,  you  can  fix  it  yourself,  and 
here's  how: 

In  approximately  35  hours  you  can 
have  smoked  venison  simply  by  cut- 
ting it  up  into  strips  and  hang  it  up 
(Continued  on  Page  24) 


23 


DON'T  WASTE  GAME  MEAT 

(Continued  from  page  23) 

where  it  can  get  plenty  of  smoke. 
Sawdust  works  well  for  smoking. 

To  pickle,  all  you  do  is  cut  the 
meat  up  into  strips  about  the  size  of 
licorice  sticks,  put  it  in  salt  brine  for 
a  day,  or  until  it  siuts  you,  and  hang 
it  to  dry  in  a  very  warm  place.  An 
oven  is  best. 

To  dry  your  venison,  cut  it  in  strips 
and  hang  it  over  a  fire  making  sure 
the  smoke  and  flames  cannot  reach 
it,  and  leave  it  there  until  it  gets  hard. 


Venison  may  be  canned  raw  and 
processed  or  it  may  be  pre-cooked, 
merely  by  following  the  directions 
used  for  canning  ordinary  meat. 

Then,  of  course,  your  meat  may  be 
frozen.  One  important  step  here  is 
aging,  which  requires  two  or  three 
weeks.  During  this  time,  it  should 
hang  in  above-freezing  temperatures 
while  unharmful  bacteria  eat  away 
the  tough  tissues  and  grissle.  After 
this  aging  period,  the  meat  is  ready 
to  cook  or  freeze.  If  frozen  venison 
is  removed  from  the  locker,  it  should 
be  cooked  the  same  day. 


A  well  trained  dog  is  as  much  a  part  of  a  successful  hunting  trip  as  a  shot-gun.     Pictured 
here  is  a  combination  of  the  traits  every  retriever  should  have:     intelligence,   obedience, 

and  enthusiasm. 


24 


J  give  my  pledge  as  an  American 

to  save  and  faithfully  to  defend 

from  waste  the  natural  resources  of 

my  country  —  its  soil  and  minerals, 

its  forests,  waters,  and  wildlife.