Skip to main content

Full text of "A system of heraldry : speculative and practical : with the true art of blazon, according to the most approved heralds in Europe : illustrated with suitable examples of armorial figures, and achievements of the most considerable surnames and families in Scotland, &c. : together with historical and genealogical memorials relative thereto"

See other formats


K». 


GENE-^L-OGY   COLLECTION 


JOHN  Ona  £WliNj6r 


GiWtAlDOLfc'/vl  CVfir\3\ 


3  1833  02696  3832 


A 

SYSTEM 

OF 

HERALDRY, 

SPECULATIVE  AND  PRACTICAL-. 


WITH  Till 


TRUE  ART  OF  BLAZON, 

ACCORDING  TO  THE 

MOST  APPROVED  HERALDS  IN  EUROPE: 


MARKS  OF  CADENCY,  MARSHALLING  OF  DIVERS  COATS  IN  ONE  SHIELD, 
EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS,  bfc.  ARE  FULLY  TREATED  OF  : 

TO  WHICH  ARE  SUBJOINED  SEFERAL  CVRIOVS  FAHtlCUZjIXS  RELATIfE  TO 

FUNERAL  ESCUTCHEONS,  PUBLIC  PROCESSIONS  AND  CAVALCADES,  CORONATIONS  OF  OUR 

KINGS,  PRECEDENCY  OF  OUR  NOBILITY  AND  GENTRY  ;    RETURN  OF  THE  LORDS 

OF  SESSION  TO  AN  ORDER  OF  THE  LORDS  SPIRITUAL  AND  TEMPORAL  IN 

PARLIAMENT  ASSEMBLED,  REQIIIRING  THEM  TO  MAKE  UP  A  ROLL 

OR  LIST  OF  THE  PEERS  OF  SCOTLAND;    AND  MEMORIALS  OF 

MANY  ANCIENT  AND  HONOURABLE  FAM1L1£S 

OF  THE  SCOTS  NATION. 


CRITICAL  AND  HISTORICAL  REMARKS  ON  THAT  PART  OF  PRTNNE  S  BISTORT, 
KNOWN  BY  THE  NAME  OF 

THE    llAGMAN-ROLL. 


By  ALEXANDER  NISBE  T,  Gent. 


THE  SECOND  EDITION. 


VOL.  IL 


EDINBURGH: 

PRINTED  BY  AND  FOR  ALEX.  LAWRIE  AND  COMPANY: 

■^OLD    BY    ALEX.   LAWRIE,    W.  LAING,    MANNERS    AND   MILLER,    ARCH.    CONSTABLE  (S*  C0» 

AND 

LONGMAN}  HURST,  REES,  AND  ORME,  LONDOIT. 


1804. 


1304323 


Uk'/^^''' 


TO  THE  RIGHT  HONOURABLE 


JAMES  Earl  of  MORTON, 


J^  (iovn\/cu/u. 


LORD  DALKEITH  AND  ABERDOUR, 

Heritable  Sheriff,  Steward  mid  Justiciary  of  the  Isles  of  Orkney  and  Zetland^ 
Vice-Admiral  of  the  same,  and  Knight  of  the  Most  Ancient  and  Most  Noble 
Order  of  the  thistle  and  St  Andrew,  Is'c. 

My  Lord, 

THE  First  Volume  of  this   work  was  dedicated  to  the  illustrious 
House  of  Hamilton :   The   second  claims   the  patronage  of  your 
Lordship,  a  branch  of  the  no  less  illustrious  House  of  Douglas. 

Had  its    valuable    author   been   alive,   he   muft   have   approved   the 
choire. 

Vol.  IL  b 


.  DEDICATION. 

Were  I  permitted,  it  were  easy  to  enlarge  on  the  antiquity  and  glori- 
ous actions  of  your  illustrious  ancestors,  some  of  whom  were  matched 
with  the  blood  royal. 

But  neither  these,  nor  your  Lordship's  personal  qualifications  dai'e  I 
adventure  on  :  The  world  knows  them ;  and  your  Lordship's  modesty, 
great  as  it  is,  cannot  conceal  them. 

I  must,  however,  be  allowed  to  say,  that  your  Lordship's  knowledge 
in  antiquities  and  polite  learning,  renders  you  a  fit  patron  for  a  work  of 
this  kind :  And  if  it  shall  be  so  lucky  as  to  meet  with  your  Lordship's 
approbation,  the  editor  need  not  fear  the  ill-nature  of  the  most  severe 
critic. 

That  your  Lordship  may  long  remain  an  ornament  to  your  noble 
House,  for  your  true  attachment  to  justice,  learning,  and  every  viraie, 
is  the  sincere  desire  of, 

My  Lord, 

Your  Lordship's  most  obedient, 

And  most  devoted  humble  servant, 

Robert  Fleming. 


PREFACE, 


THE  learned  and  ingenious  Mr  Alexander  Nisbet,  author  of  this  Sys- 
tem of  Heraldry,  has,  in  his  Preface  to  the  First  Volume,  so  fully  ac- 
counted for  the  original  and  progress  of  Armorial  Bearings  with  us,  and 
other  nations,  and,  in  the  Treatise  itself,  so  elaborately  and  accurately 
described  and  exemplified  the  several  branches  of  the  Science  of  Heraldry, 
that  it  will  be  equally  superfluous  to  add  any  thing  to  wljat  he  has  said 
in  the  former,  or  bestow  any  encomiums  on  his  performance  in  the  latter, 
which  has  suiSciently  recommended  Itself  to  all  who  rightly  understand 
the  noble  science  there  treated  of. 

But  Mr  Nisbet  not  being  able  to  overtake  his  whole  design  in  one 
volume,  as  at  first  he  intended,  for  the  several  reasons  set  forth  in  the 
said  Preface,  he  therefore  promises  an  Appendix,  or  Second  Volume, 
wherein  the  several  branches  of  heraldry,  not  there  treated  of,  were  to  be 
illustrated ;  and,  as  this  viadertaking  is  now  finished,  and  presents  itself 
to  the  public,  it  will  be  necessary  that  the  editor  should  say  something 
in  behalf  of  the  performance. 

In  the  First  Part  of  this  Volume,  the  following  branches  of  Heraldry, 
viz.  Marks  of  Cadency,  Marshalling  of  Divers  Coats  in  one  Shield,  Ex- 
terior Ornaments,  &c.  are  fully  treated  of,  and  illustrated  by  proper  ex- 
amples, all  which  were  executed  by  the  author  himself  in  his  own  life- 
time ;  the  manuscript  copy  of  which,  in  his  own  hand-writing,  the  edi- 
tor has  preserved  for  the  satisfaction  of  the  curious. 

The  other  parts  handled  in  this  undertaking,  are  inserted  because  of 
their  coincidency  with  the  principal  subject  treated  of  in  this  Volume. 
Of  this  kind  is  the  chapter  of  Funeral  Escutcheons,  which  was  composed 
by  Roderick  Chalmers,  herald,  and  herald-painter  in  Edinburgh,  whose  un- 
derstanding and  practice  in  these  matters  is  well  known  ;  and  the  other 
chapters,  such  as  that  of  Precedency,  the  Office  and  Dignity  of  Heralds, 
&c.  and  that  concerning  Public  Processions  and  Cavalcades,  which  gives 
an  idea  of  the  grandeur  of  this  ancient  and  once  flourishing  kingdom, 
were  all  carefully  collected  from  MSS.  in  the  Lawyers'  Library,  and  the 
writings  of  the  learned  Sir  George  Mackenzie,  &c. 

To  render  this  work  the  more  useful  and  complete,  the  editor  has  given 
the  Return  of  the  Lords  of  Session,  to  an  order  of  the  House  of  Peers, 
concerning  the  Scots  peerage ;  which  cannot  fail  to  give  satisfaction,  as  it 
was  the  I'esult  of  the  inquiries  of  that  august  Court  into  the  records  of  the 
nation,  and  is  a  most  exact  and  authentic  state  of  our  peerage  at  this  day. 

The  editor  observing  that  no  body  had  ever  yet  published  an  exact 
draught  of  these  monuments  of  the  antiquity  and  Independency  of  this 
kingdom,  the  Regalia,  viz.  Crown,  Sceptre  and  Sword ;  and,  as  the  ori- 
ginals are  not  now  to  be  seen,  he  has  embellished  the  work  with  a  plate 


ii  ,  PREFACE. 

of  them,  which  the  ingenious  Mr  Richard  Cooper  has  engraven,  with 
preat  pains  and  exactness,  from  the  description  given  of  them  in  the  in- 
strument taken  by  that  true  lover  of  his  country,  Mr  WiUiam  Wilson, 
at  depositing  them  in  the  castle  of  Edinburgh. 

But  what  takes  up  a  great  part  of  this  Volume,  is  the  memorials  of 
private  f;imilies,  which  neither  Mr  Nisbet  nor  the  publisher  are  any  ways 
answerable  for ;  they  must  stand  upon  the  faith  of  those  who  gave  them 
in,  and  the  vouchers  they  adduce  for  their  support.  Many  of  those 
printed  in  Mr  Nisbet's  lifetime  were  signed  by  the  parties  concerned ; 
but  that  practice  was  afterwards  neglected,  since  every  one,  no  doubt, 
will  be  ready  to  support  what  he  has  advanced  for  the  honour  and  an- 
tiquity of  his  family. 

From  what  is  above  set  forth,  it  will  be  evident  that  the  editor  has  nei- 
ther spared  pains  nor  expences  to  render  this  book  useful  and  valuable. 

It  may  now  be  expected  that  he  should  give  some  account  to  the  sub- 
scribers for  the  delay  in  the  publication ;  and  indeed  this,  in  part,  may 
be  ascribed  to  Mr  Nisbet's  death,  and  the  property  of  it  going  through 
many  different  hands,  and  likewise  to  the  dilatoriness  of  the  subscribers 
in  giving  in  memorials  of  their  families  :  However,  as  it  now  comes 
abroad  into  the  world,  it  is  hoped  it  will  give  general  satisfaction,  and 
meet  with  a  favourable  reception,  both  as  it  completes  the  design  of  its 
worthy  author,  who  was  the  most  learned  in  the  noble  Science  of  He- 
raldry of  any  that  ever  appeared  in  this  country,  yea,  perhaps,  not  in- 
ferior to  any ;  and,  as  it  contains  many  curious  things,  which  tend  to 
illustrate  the  honour  and  dignity  of  the  nation,  either  never  before  print- 
ed, or  only  to  be  found  in  loose  papers  in  the  hands  of  the  curious,  not 
to  mention  the  memorials  of  many  ancient  and  noble  families  who  have 
deserved  well  of  their  country,  the  executing  of  which  has  far  exceeded 
the  number  of  sheets  at  first  proposed. 

Since  finishing  the  impression  of  this  work,  the  editor  coming  to  the 
knowledge,  that  a  learned  antiquarian  had  written  Historical  and  Critical 
Remarks  on  the  surna:mes  and  families  of  those  whose  predecessors  sware 
fealty  to  Edward  I.  of  England,  in  1292,  &c.  inserted  in  a  writing  com- 
monly known  by  the  name  of  Ragman  Roll,  he  purchased  the  same  at 
a  considerable  expence,  and  has  printed  it  in  a  size  fit  to  be  bound  up 
with  this  volume  :  And,  as  it  proves  the  antiquity  of  many  of  the  sur- 
names, and  most  of  the  great  families  of  this  kingdom,  and  in  a  great 
measure  supphes  the  want  of  particular  memorials  of  many  of  these  fa- 
milies, it  is  hoped,  such  as  would  have  it  bound  up  with  their  copy,  will 
not  grudge  a  particular  allowance  for  it,  as  well  as  for  the  supernitmerary 
sheets  above  the  number  mentioned  in  the  proposals. 

Robert  Fleming. 


SYSTEM 

OF 

HERALDRY, 

SPECULATIVE  AND  PRACTICAL: 
WITH  THE  TRUE  ART  OF  BLAZON. 


PAR  T   THIRD. 


CHAP.     I. 

OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  OR  MARKS  OF  CADENCY. 

}N  the  First  Part  of  this  System  I  have  given  an  account  of  the  Rise  and  Art  of 
Biaiun  of  Arms,  of  their  Tinctures,  Figures,  Proper,  Natural,  and  Artificial; 
in  their  Terms,  Regular  Positions,  Dispositions,  and  Situations,  illustrated  by  a  nu- 
merous train  of  examples. 

And  now,  for  the  further  prosecution  of  my  System,  it  will  not  be  unusetul  to 
repeat  my  definition  of  arms,  given  in  the  former  part,  Chap.  2. 

^rmj- are  hereditary  marks  of  honour,  regularly  composed  of  certain  tinctures 
and  figures,  granted  or  authorised  by  sovereigns,  for  distinguishing,  diftereiicing, 
and  illustrating  persons,  famihes,  and  communities.  To  which  I  shall  add  a  defini- 
tion given  bv  a  very  eminent  author,  John  Baptista  Christyn,  Chancellor  of  Bra- 
bant, in  his  famous  treatise,  titled.  Jiinspn/dentiu  Heroica,  de  Jure  Belgitrum  circa 
NobiUtatem.  page  78.  "  Signa.  summi  principis  autoritate,  alicui  concessa,  aut  pro- 
"  pria  voluntatp  assumpta,  personam  a  persona,  familias  a  familiis,  civitates  a 
"  civitatibus,  coll-gia  a  col'egiis,  varie  distinguentia." 

From  these  definitions  the  use  of  arms  is  obvious,  viz.  Cbesides  their  being. hb- 
nouiable  rewards  of  virtue)  to  distinguish  and  difference  persons,  fam'li' s  and 
ccn  nnmities :  So  as,  first,  to  distinguish  the  nobihty  an'l  gentry  from  the  vul- 
gar.    S,-condly,  to  distinguish  principal  families  of  nobihty  and  gentry  amongst 

Vol.  II.  A 


i  OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  i^c. 

themselves.  And,  thirdly,  to  difference  descendants  of  each  particular  family 
amongst  themselves,  conform  to  then-  seniority. 

As  to  the  first  of  these  uses,  viz.  the  distmction  of  the  nobility  from  the  vulgar; 
it  is  plain  from  the  foresaid  definition,  that  no  person  or  family  are  entitled  to 
carry  arms,  but  such  as  have  received,  or  assumed  the  same  by  approbation  ot  so- 
vereign authority,  which  is  sufficient  to  distinguish  the  vulgar  from  the  nobility 
and  gentry,  so  that  I  need  not  further  to  insist  on  that  use  of  arms. 

As  to  the  second,  I  hope  I  have  sufficiently  accounted  for  the  same  in  the  First 
Part  of  this  System. 

The  third  shall  be  the  subject  of  this  chapter,  in  which  1  shall  give  the  several 
differences  that  have  been  used  by  the  descendants  of  nobility  and  gentry,  to  dif- 
ference themselves  from  their  original  and  principal  families,  that  their  degrees  of 
descent  may  be  known,  which  are  as  necessary  as  the  former,  for  diflerencing 
younger  brothers  and  their  issue  from  the  eldest,  that  the  order  and  degrees  of 
both,  in  the  lines  of  the  descendants  from  one  stem,  may  be  known,  to  prevent 
confusion  and  contention  amongst  them  ;  all  which  hath  been  carefully  looked  to 
by  sovereign  princes  their  laws  and  edicts. 

With  us,  our  king  and  parliament,  in  the  year  1590,  for  regulating  the  dif- 
ferences of  descendants,  made  an  act,  impowering  the  Lyon  King  at  Arms,  and  his 
brethren  heralds,  to  visit  the  whole  arms  of  noblemen,  barons,  and  gentlemen, 
within  Scotland,  and  to  distinguish  them  with  congruent  differences,  and  to 
matriculate  them  in  their  books.  As  also  to  inhibit  all  such  as  bear  arms,  as  by 
the  law  of  arms  ought  not  to  bear  them,  under  high  penalties;  as  the  act  more 
particularly  bears.  And,  in  the  year  1672,  chap.  21.  the  foresaid  act  of  Parlia- 
ment is  renewed  and  ratified,  and  the  Lyon  King  at  Arms  is  impowered  to  dis- 
tinguish arms,  and  to  matriculate  them  in  his  books  or  registers,  from  whence  I 
have  taken,  and  do  take  most  of  my  examples  in  this  System,  which  are  marked 
L.  R. 

Our  above-mentioned  author  gives  us  the  edict  of  Albert  and  Isabel,  Sovereign 
Princes  of  the  Netherlands,  published  in  the  year  i6r6,  with  his  Commentary 
thereon,  in  his  above-named  book,  Juiisprud.  Her.  or  Be  Jure  Belgarum  circa 
Nobilitatem  y  Injignia,  in  the  5th  article  concerning  Brisures,  or  Marks  of  Cadency, 
has  these  words,  "  Ut  altercationibus  jurgiisque,  quae  ex  planorum  insignium  de- 
"  latione  oriri  solent,  obviam  eatur,  jubemus,  familiarum  omnium  natu  minimos, 
"  imo  vel  maximos  spirante  patre,  gentilitiis  insignibus  quoddam  addere  discerni- 
"  culum,  moribus  usitatum,  ut  inde  geniturae  ordo  pateat,  &-  perpetuo  lineae  dig- 
"  nosci  possint,  idque  donee  anteriores  defecerint,  aliter  facientibus,  indicta  est 
"  poena  50  Florenorum."  Which  is  to  this  purpose  by  the  foresaid  article,  "  To 
"  remedy  the  debates  (which  may  as  they  have  been  seen  to  fall  out  in  time  by- 
"  gone)  touching  the  seniority,  and  carrying  che  plain  arms,  we  will  and  ordain, 
"  that  the  youngest  sons  (and  even  the  eldest  sons  in  their  fathers'  lifetimej  shall 
"  be  hoiden  to  place  in  their  arms  some  brisure,  in  the  accustoriied  form,  for  a 
•'  distinction  from  the  eldest,  and  to  continue  such  brisure  as  long  time  as  the 
"  branches  of  the  eldest  remain ;  to  the  end,  that  the  descendants  of  the  one  or 
"  other  branch  may  be  known  and  discerned,  under  the  pain  of  50  Florinses. 

On  the  laws  and  edicts  of  France,  Spain,  and  other  nations,  I  forbear  to  insist ; 
but  show  some  of  their  practices  in  this  matter,  which  are  various. 

The  differences,  or  additional  figures,  used  by  cadets,  to  difference  themselves 
from  their  original  families,  are  termed  by  us  in  Britain,  differences,  or  marks  of 
cadency;  by  the  French,  brisures,  upon  the  account  they  break  the  principal 
bearing  of  the  family  :  And  those  who  write  in  Latin,  call  them  armorum  discerni- 
cula,  and  ordinarily  say,  priinogenitus  arma  hcibet  Integra,  cceteri  nota  quadam  dis- 
creta. 

It  is  many  years  since  I  published  an  Essay  of  Marks  of  Cadency,  in  which  I 
was  as  full  as  the  practice  of  our  nation  allowed  me,  and  took  in  such  foreign 
examples  as  were  suitable  to  illustrate  that  work;  some  part  of  which  I  am  obliged 
to  repeat  in  this  chapter  as  curtly  as  possible,  the  rules  thereof  being  sufficiently 
exemphfied  in  that  Essay,  and  many  of  them  in  the  former  part  of  this  System. 

But  now  1  shall  proceed  to  the  universal  practice  of  differencing  the  arms  of  de- 
scendants, which  are,  and  have  been  very  various  through  all  Europe :  And  I 


OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  i^c.  3 

think  the  same  may  be  reduced  to  these  nine  ways :  First,  the  change  of  tlie  tinc- 
tures of  the  field :  Secondly,  the  change  of  the  tinctures  of  the  principal  or  es- 
seinial  figures :  Thirdly,  by  dividing  the  field,  by  the  partition  lines,  under  acci- 
dental forms:  Fourtlily,  the  displacaig  the  figures,  or  altering  their  positions  or 
situations  in  the  shield  :  Fifthly,  the  diminishing  the  number  of  them:  Sixthly^ 
by  increasing  the  number  of  the  principal  or  original  figuies:  Seventhly,  by  adding 
duierent  figures  to  the  principal  ones:  Eighthly,  by  quartering  the  paternal  arms 
with  other  ones:  And,  Ninthly,  by  transposing  the  quarters,  or  changing  the  crest; 
to  each  of  which  I  shall  speak. 

First  then,  as  for  altering  the  tinctures  of  the  field,  it  was  anciently  used  : 
John  Baptista.  in  his  forecited  Treatise,  Art.  5th,  says,  "  Olim  Belgi  &  Galli  sola 
"  c^'lorum  variatione  arma  discernebant ;"  and  adds,  •'  Imo  £t  apud  Britannos  mos 
"  hie  cognitus."  Of  old  the  Belgians  and  French  differenced  arms  by  changing 
only  the  tinctures  of  the  field  ;  and  this  practice  was  with  the  Britons.  He  gives 
us  instances  of  this  practice  in  Flanders,  in  the  1120,  that  oi  Anwldus  Arescoti 
Comes,  who  had  five  sons;  the  eldest  carried  the  plain  arms  of  his  father,  being 
or,  three  flower-de-luces  sable;  the  second  son,  Baron  of  WosemaJe,  altered  the 
tinctures,  and  carried,  gules,  three  flower-de-luces  argent;  the  third  son,  Baron  of 
Roteslakie,  counter-changed  his  immediate  brother's  bearing,  by  making  them, 
argent,  three  flower-de-luces  gules;  the  fourth  son  took  argent,  three  flower-de- 
luces  sable;  and  the  fifth,  gules,  three  flower-de-luces  or.  Our  author  proceeds  to 
give  many  instances  of  this  kind,  not  only  in  Flanders,  but  in  France,  and  disap- 
proves of  this  way  of  difterencing,  that  it  altogether  changes  and  confuses  arms ; 
his  words  are,  "  Puto  quippe  mos  ille  non  adeo  insignia  distinguendo,  quam  in 
"  totum  immutando  subserviit,  ex  quo  plurimum  gentilium  cunfusio  &-  perturba- 
"  tio  demanavit."  And  in  that  paragraph  he  tells  us,  that  the  lamble,  orle,  and 
bordure,  were  not  then  known  to  the  Belgians  for  differences,  till  they  got  them 
from  the  French. 

Sir  WiUiam  Dugdale,  Garter  King  at  Arms  in  England,  in  his  book,  titled,  The 
Ancient  Usage  in  Bearing  Arms,  says.  The  differences  that  antiquity  used  for 
distinguishing  descendants  were  by  changing  the  colour  of  the  field,  figures,  or 
charges;  and,  for  instances,  he  gives  us  the  practice  of  the  family  of  Basset  in 
England,  in  the  reigns  of  Edwards  I.  II.  and  111.  and  in  the  families  of  the  name 
of  L'Estrange  there.  I  have  given  several  instances  of  the  same  practice  of  old, 
by  the  Royal  issue  of  the  kings  of  France,  England,  and  Scotland,  in  my  former 
Essay  on  this  subject,  and  shall  only  mention  again  a  few  witli  us. 

The  Homes,  as  descended  of  the  old  Earls  of  March,  who  carried  gules,  a  lion 
rampant  argen' ,  their  paternal  ensign,  (the  bordure  which  surromided,  and  charged 
with  roses,  being  the  badge  of  their  comital  office)  carried  the  same  white  lion, 
but  placed  it  in  a  green  field,  for  diffirence,  as  .relative  to  their  first  designation, 
from  their  lands  of  Greenlaw,  which  they  first  possessed,  as  in  the  old  charter  of 
IViriielmuf  Jilius  Cospatricii  Comitis  Djminis  de  Greenlaw.  His  posterity  having 
purchased  the  lands  of  Home,  were  after. v aids  designed  Domini  de  Home;  from 
whence  came  the  surname.  Of  whicn,  more  fully,  in  an  essay  of  mine  on  thib 
suDJect,  page  20,  and  in  the  first  part  of  this  System,  fmge  270.  The  same  way, 
of  oil,  the  progenitors  of  the  family  of  Dundas  of  that  Ilk,  as  descended  of  a 
younger  son  of  CospMricius  Comes,  the  fi  st  Earl  of  March,  (of  wliich  mui'e  fully 
in  the  Append. x)  dilTerenced  themselves  by  a  transmutation  of  the  tinctures  of 
the  old  Earls  of  March,  gules,  a  lion  argent,  into  argent,  a  lion  gules;  whicli  the 
principal  family  still  continues,  and  a'l  the  branches  of  the  faaiily,  with  suitable 
marks  of  cadency.  The  principal  family  of  the  name  of  Douglas  carried  argent, 
a  chief  azure,  charged,  with  three  stars  of  the  field. 

Hugh  Douglas  Earl  of  Ormonq,  in  the  reign  of  Kiny  James  II.  fourth  son  of 
James  Earl  of  Douglas,  to  diflference  himself,  changed  the  tincture  of  the  field  of 
Douglas  to  ermine.  Campbell  of  Loudon  differenced  himself  from  his  chief,  the 
family  of  Argyle,  which  carried,  gironne  of  eight,  jr  and  sable,  by  changing  the 
tinctures  of  the  girons  into  ermine  and  gules;  which  two  tinctures  also  th^y  took 
to  show  their  relation  to  the  Cravvfurds  of  Loudon,  with  whom  they  married,  bear- 
ing gules,  a  fesse  ermine. 


^  OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  i^c. 

The  second  way  proposed  in  differencing,  by  changing  the  tinctures  of  the  prin- 
cipal or  essential  figures  of  arms,  falls  frequently  out  by  changing  the  tinctures 
of  the  field ;  especially  when  cadets  divide  the  field  of  their  arms,  for  a  difference, 
into  two  distinct  tinctures  of  metal  colours.  And  when  there  is  but  one  tincture 
in  the  principal  bearing,  then  the  cadets  are  necessitated  to  alter  the  tinctuie  of 
some  of  their  figures,  by  counter^changing  them  with  the  field,  that  metal  lie  not 
upon  metal,  nor  colour  upon  colour.  The  field,  when  it  is  divided  into  two  halves 
by  any  of  the  four  principal  partition  lines,  which  are  called  by  the  English,  part- 
ed per  pale,  per  /esse,  per  bend,  dexter  and  sinister;  by  the  French,  parti,  coupe, 
tranche,  taille,  which  I  have  explained  and  demonstrated  in  the  7th  chapter  of  the 
First  Part  of  this  System.  Of  this  practice  with  us,  amongst  many  examples,  I 
shall  add  one  from  the  Lyon  Register.  Laurence  Oliphant,  Writer  to  the  Signet, 
descended  of  a  second  son  of  Oliphant  of  Gask,  a  second  son  of  the  Lord  Oliphant, 
carries,  parted  per  fesse,  ^;^/fj- and  argent,  three  crescents,  2  and  i,  counter-changed 
of  the  same  tinctures,  to  difference  him  from  Gask,  who  had  his  field  but  01  one 
tincture,  viz.  gules,  three  crescents  argent,  2  and  i.  This  way  of  dividing  the  field 
into  two  difterent  tinctures,  and  counter-changing  the  charge,  (the  principal  fa- 
mily having  his  figures  in  a  field  of  one  tincture)  is  a  remote  brisure  suitable  for 
cadets  of  cadets. 

The  third  way  of  differencing  by  the  partition  lines,  under  accidental  forms, 
is  done,  when  the  chief  of  the  name  and  family  has  the  field  of  his  arms  divided 
into  two  tinctures,  by  any  of  the  partition  lines,  plain  and  straight,  then  their 
descendants  ordinarily  have  the  same,  but  makes  the  partition  line  crooked,  that 
is,  by  patting  the  same  under  some  accidental  form  ;  such  as,  iiigrailed,  ivaved, 
nebule,  embattled,  &c.  The  Right  Honourable  the  Earl  of  Panmure,  chief  of  the 
name  of  Maule,  carries,  parted  per  pale,  argent  and  gules,  a  bordure  charged  with 
eight  escalops,  all  counter-changed  of  the  same.  Of  which  family  in  the  follow- 
ing chapter.  The  cadets  of  this  family  differenced  themselves  from  their  chief 
only  by  having  the  partition  hne  waved,  or  nebule,  as  in  the  Register  of  the  He- 
rald-Office. 

Fourth  way  of  differencing,  is,  by  diminishing  the  principal  figures,  by  carrying 
fewer  of  them  than  the  chief  family.  In  Jurisprudentia,  Art.  5th,  there  are  in- 
stances given  us  of  this  practice.  The  family  of  Clermont  Tallart,  in  Dau- 
phiny,  carries  gules,  two  keys  in  saltier  argent.  The  family  of  Chatto,  descended 
of  it,  was  obliged  to  ciixxy  gules,  one  key  in  bend  argent:  And  the  House  of  Urre, 
in  the  same  province,  carries  a  bend  charged  with  three  stars :  The  cadets  of  this 
House  carry,  on  the  bend,  but  one  star.  Chassanteus,  in  his  Catal.  Glor.  Mundi, 
is  for  this  way  of  differencing,  and  says,  "  Quilibet  primo  genitus  solet  portare 
"  arma  plena  &-  Integra  ipsius  domus  sine  diminutione,  alii  vero  posteriores  &■ 
"  postea  geniti  descendentes  portant  ea  cum  aliqua  differentia,  diminutione  & 
"  distinctione."  The  author  of  Jurisprudentia  says,  "  Alium  &-  veterem,  sed  per- 
"  rarum  insignia  frangendi  morem  observo,  quo  minores  natu  aliquam  in  insigni- 
"  bus  particulam  ad  distinctionem  primogenitorum  omittere  soliti  erant."  This 
way  of  differencing,  by  diminishing  the  principal  figures,  by  younger  sons,  is  very 
rare,  and  seldom  to  be  met  with ;  few  or  none  of  the  arms  in  Great  Britain,  upon 
the  account  of  this  way  of  differencing,  has  occurred  to  me. 

The  fifth  way,  by  altering  the  position  and  situation  of  the  principal  and  essen- 
tial figures,  by  cadets,  is  more  frequent  with  us  than  the  former.  In  England  I 
find  this  practice,  from  the  learned  Camden,  in  his  book  entitled.  Remains  Con- 
cerning Britain,  chapter  Of  Armories;  who  says,  In  past  ages  those  who  were  de- 
scended from  one  stem,  reserving  the  principal  charge,  and  commonly  the  colour 
of  the  coat,  made  some  addition  or  alteration  of  the  figures;  as,  for  example,  the 
fi.-  t  Lord  Clifford  bare,  cheque,  or  and  azure,  a  bendlet  gules,  which  the  eldest 
sons  of  that  family  kept  as  long  as  they  continued.  A  second  son  of  the  family 
made  the  bendlet  a  bend,  and  thereupon  placed  three  lionceaux  passant;  from 
whom  the  Cliffords  of  Frampton  are  descended.  Roger  Clifford,  a  second  son 
of  Walter  Cliftord,  the  first  lord,  for  the  bendlet  took  a  fesse  gules,  keeping  still 
the  tincture,  as  the  Earl  of  Cumberland,  from  him  descended,  beareth  now:  And 
the  Cliffords  of  Kent,  branched  out  of  that  House,  took  the  same,  with  a  bordure 
gules.     Whereas,  also,  the  Lord  Gobham  did  bertr,  gules,  on  a  cheveron  or,  three 


OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  W^-.  5 

lionceaux  rampant  sablf.  The  younger  brethren  of  that  House,  viz.  Couiiams  of 
Steiburv.  of  Bluckbury,  of  Billockly,  took,  for  the  three  honceaux,  tiiree  cstoils; 
the  second,  three  eaglets ;  the  last,  three  crescents.  Berkeley  of  Wymoadhani,  m 
thecountyof  Leicester,  descended  from  the  Lord  Berkeley,  who  carried  a  cheveron 
betwixt  ten  cross  patees,  changed  these  ten  crosses  into  as  many  cinquefoils.  The  same 
practice  is  with  us,  for  cadets  to  change  and  alter  the  position  of  the  principal  figures. 
The  Herrikos  of  Gilmcrton  bare  gules,  on  a  bend  argent,  a  rose  betwixt  two  lions 
rampant  of  the  field.  Herring  of  Lethendy  added  another  rose,  but  Herring  of 
Carswell  turned  the  bend  to  a  fesse.  Scot  r  of  Bevelaw  turned  the  bend,  carried  by 
Scot  of  Buccleugh,  into  a  fesse,  for  ditference,  without  any  other  addition,  or,  on  a 
fesse  azure,  a  star  of  six  points,  between  two  crescents  of  the  field.  The  same  did 
Leslie  of  Balquhain,  in  turning  his  cliief's  bend  uito  a  fesse,  without  any  other 
addition. 

The  sixth  method  or  way  of  differencing  cadets,  is  by  adding  figures  to  the  arms 
of  chiefs  of  families,  which  is  now  most  frequently  used,  diverse  ways,  by  different 
nations:  But  when  these  additional  figures  began,  what  they  are,  and  how  to  be 
disposed,  for  differencing  the  numerous  issue  of  descendants,  is  the  subject  of  the 
following  discourse:  For  it  seems  the  variation  of  the  tinctures  of  field,  and  figures, 
was  not  sufficient  without  additional  ones,  which  we  find  first  used  by  the  French ; 
and  from  them  the  Belgians,  with  whom  arms  were  very  soon  used,  and  regular, 
took  the  lambel,  orle,  bordure,  as  additional  figures.  The  author  of  Jiirisprudentin 
Heroica,  article  5th,  paragraph  6th,  says,  "  Varii  tamen  a  variis  nationibus  scut;; 
"  diffringendi  modi  observati  sunt:  Apud  primes  Brabantos  &-  Belgas  incognita 
"  fuere,  tigilla,  liinbi,  margines,  Gallice,  lambeaux,  orles,  bordures,  qu;c  tunc  tem- 
"  poris  a  Gallis  mutuati  sunt,  sed  ipsa  arma  quidam  ab  uxoribus,  quidam  a  terri- 
"  toi'iis,  gloriffi  sibi  duxerunt;  plerique  tamen  familiaria  retinuere  insignia,  colo- 
"  rum  dumtaxat  adhibita  variatione."  Divers  nations  used  different  ways  antl" 
marks,  in  distinguishing  the  arms  of  descendants  of  one  family  from  another:  For, 
of  old,  the  Brabantines  and  Belgians  did  not  know  the  lambel,  bordure,  orle,  whicli 
were  then  used  by  the  French,  for  differences,  but  took  figures  from  their  mothers, 
wives,  territories,  and  feudal  ensigns,  to  difference  themselves;  and  many  kepi 
the  arms  of  the  family  entire,  only  making  some  alteration  of  the  tinctures  or  fi- 
gures. 

When  the  French  began  to  use  those  above-mentioned,  and  other  additional 
figures  to  the  lilies  of  France,  by  younger  sons,  is  uncertain.  Some  say,  (as  one 
Paradin)  that  Robert  tlie  first  Earl  of  Anjou,  descended  of  Hugh  Capet,  carried 
azure,  seme  oi  Ao\\tv-Ae.-\ac<iS  or,  within  a  bordure  gules,  in  the  year  988.  Alo- 
vertus,  and  Belliforestus,  as  in  Jurisprud.  Her.  say,  That  Philip  the  august  King 
of  France,  who  reigned  I iSr,  was  the  first  that  permitted  the  sons  of  France  to 
carry  the  arms  of  France  with  brisures,  being  before  that  time  unlawful  to  be  car- 
ried by  the  sons  of  France.  Others  again  say,  that  the  sons  of  France  did  not 
carry  the  arms  of  France  without,  or  with  brisures,  till  Lewis  the  Gross,  who  be- 
gan his  reign  in  the  year  1 1 10.  Whatever  those  writers  say,  I  am  persuaded, 
that 

Anciently  the  younger  sons  of  the  Kings  of  France  were  not  permitted  to  carry 
the  arms  of  France  with  a  brisure,  but  only  allowed  to  make  use  of  the  tinctiu-cs 
of  the  kingdom,  azure  and  or,  in  those  figures,  which  the  younger  sons  of  tlie 
kings  assumed,  on  the  account  of  their  marriages,  or  appanages.  Thus,  the  old 
Dukes  of  Burgundy  took  for  arms,  bendy,  or  and  azure,  within  a  bordure  gules. 
And  the  old  Counts  of  Verm.^ndois  carried,  cheque,  or  and  azure,  as  Sylvester 
Petra  Sancta  observes,  out  of  Marcus  Gilbertus  de  IVarenius,  cap.  67.  de  guttatis 
tigillis  tesserariis.  We  find,  in  later  times,  the  second  race  of  the  Dukes  of  Bur- 
gundy (descended  of  the  royal  fa;iiily)  carried  the  arms  of  France,  viz.  azure, 
seme  of  flower-de-luces  or,  within  a  bordure  compone,  argent  and  gules,  for  a  brisure, 
which  they  quartered  with  ancient  Burgundy  first,  and  afterwards  with  other  arms. 
So  the  second  race  of  the  Counts  of  Vermandois  (when  brisures  became  more  fre- 
quent and  ordinary)  added  a  chief  azure,  seme  of  flower-de-luces  or,  to  show  their 
extraction  was  from  the  royal  blood  of  France. 

It  cannot  be  hence  concluded,  that  proper  differences  were  not  in  use  till  the 
sons  of  sovereigns  carried  the  sovereigns'  ensigns  with  brisures,  which  was  but  late. 


6  OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  Wc. 

because  those  were  looked  upon  as  sacred  and  incommunicable,  being  the  ensigns 
of  sovereignty.  Before  these  were  allowed,  the  sons  of  France  had  arms  of  the 
royal  tinctures,  which  were  transmitted  to  their  younger  sons,  with  suitable  dif- 
ferences then  in  use.  The  same  practice  was  anciently  with  us,  for  the  sons  of 
our  kings  did  not  carry  the  arms  of  the  kingdom  with  a  difference.  David  Earl 
of  Huntingdon,  brother  to  King  William  the  Lion,  carried  or,  an  escutcheon, 
within  a  double  tressure,  counter-flowered  gules,  being  of  the  tinctures  of  the  royal 
bearing  of  Scotland.  And  long  after,  John  Senescal  Earl  of  Carrick,  eldest  son 
to  King  Robert  IL  did  not  carry  the  arms  of  the  kingdom  with  a  label,  during 
Iiis  father's  reign  (as  our  princes  have  done  since),  but  the  paternal  coat  of  Stewart, 
as  appears  by  this  prince's  seals,  with  a  lion  natssanl  out  of  the  fesse  cheque,  inti- 
mating his  right  to  the  crown ;  as  also,  that  it  was  then  beginning  to  be  customary 
for  the  sons  of  our  kings  to  carry  their  father's  sovereign  coat  with  brisures;  for, 
when  John  Earl  of  Carrick  came  to  the  throne,  by  the  name  of  Robert  IIL  and 
liad  a  son,  David  the  prince,  the  elder  brother  of  King  James  L  carried  the  impe- 
rial bearing  of  Scotland,  bruised  with  a  label  of  three  points.  And  can  any  pre- 
tend to  say,  that  before  that  time  the  younger  sons  of  our  nobility  and  gentry 
did  not  carry  their  father's  arms  with  some  difference  or  other,  to  difference  them- 
selves from  their  elder  brothers,  and  their  descendants.  But  to  proceed  to  show 
and  describe  the  differences,  or  marks  of  cadency,  the  lambel,  or  label,  batton,  or 
cottise,  bordure,  or  fillier,  and  cheveron,  which  are  called,  by  some  heralds,  the 
principal  differences;  because,  according  to  them,  they  are  never  seen  in  arms  but 
when  they  difference  younger  sons.  This  may  be  said  of  the  first  two,  the  lambel 
and  batton;  but  the  bordure  and  cheveron  are  sometimes  carried  as  principal  and 
essential  figures  in  arms,  though  very  frequently  as  marks  of  cadency  too,  which  I 
shall  show  by  the  general  practice  in  Europe. 

The  lambel,  or  label,  is  derived  from  lambeau,  i.  e.  as  heralds  say,  "  Semen  seu 
"  recisa  panni  particula,  sa  robe  s'en  va  par  lambeaux;  vestis  in  minutas  discindi- 
"  tur  particulas;"  from  whence  comes  lambriquius,  lacinia  Jiuentes  ex  galea,  which 
we  call  ordinarily  mantlings;  of  which  in  another  place. 

The  label,  or  lambel,  is  taken  there  for  a  piece  of  silk  stuff,  or  some  such  thing, 
wherewith  princes  of  old  environed  their  heads,  which  was  called  a  diadem,  or 
fillet,  such  as  we  now  see  Moors'  heads  banded  with  in  arms,  as  Selden  observes. 
Others  take  the  label  for  the  tying  of  crowns  and  garlands  with  points  hanging 
down ;  but  our  French  heralds  will  have  it  a  kind  of  scarf,  or  ribbon,  which  young 
men  wore  anciently  about  the  neck  of  their  helmets  (as  we  now  do  cravats)  with 
points  hanging  down,  when  they  went  to  the  wars,  or  military  exercises,  such  as 
tournaments,  with  their  fathers,  by  which  they  were  distinguished  from  them ; 
and  where  it  was  customary,  in  some  places,  for  younger  brothers  to  be  distin- 
guished from  their  elder  brothers,  the  points  of  the  tyings  hang  down  upon  the 
chief,  or  upper  part  of  their  shields,  whereon  was  their  father's  arms:  From  whence 
heralds  do  present  this  figure  as  a  brisure  upon  the  armorial  ensigns  of  the 
eldest  sons,  whilst  their  father  is  in  life;  and  by  custom  it  was  also  given  to  young- 
er sons;  of  which  practice  we  shall  speak  hereafter;  the  form  thereof  is  as  you  see 
in  Plate  L  fig.  i.  The  traverse,  we  call  the  beam,  which  does  not  touch  the  sides  of 
the  shield ;  and  the  pieces  that  hang  down  are  the  points,  whicli  are  always 
patulous,  I.  e.  broad  at  the  ends. 

The  heralds,  who  write  in  Latin,  give  the  word  lemniscus  for  a  lambel;  and 
Camden  and  Uredus  use  the  word  lambella,  as  in  the  blazon  of  the  arms  of 
AvESNES,  a  signiory  in  Hainault,  "  Scutum  sexies  auro  &-  minio  dextrorsus  facia- 
"  tim,  superimposita  quinque  partium  lambella,"  /.  e.  bendy  of  six,  or  and  gules, 
over  all  a  lambel  of  five  points,  and  sometimes  the  lambel  of  three  points,  Uredus 
calls  fasciola  trijida,  and  ChifHetius  uses  the  word  limbus  tripes,  for  a  lambel  of 
three  points. 

The  number  of  the  points  of  the  lambel  may  be  either  even  or  odd,  to  the  num- 
ber of  nine;  but  when  it  is  used  by  the  eldest  son  in  his  father's  lifetime,  it  has 
only  three  points,  which  are  plain,  /.  e.  not  charged,  or  under  accidental  forms; 
but  when  it  is  so,  and  of  more  points  than  three,  it  shows  the  bearer  not  to  be  the 
ddest  son,  but  the  younger,  or  one  of  his  descendants. 


OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  i^c.  7 

I  shall  in  some  few  instances  show  the  antiquity  of  tlie  lambel.  We  read,  thai 
St  Bernard,  in  his  rules  to  the  Templars,  discharged  the  wearing  of  lambels  about 
the  heads  and  necks  of  those  of  that  Order,  because  they  were  used  by  laics  as 
military  marks,  and  not  fit  for  ecclesiastics,  and  calls  them  laqueie  l^  rostra.  But 
it  IS  to  be  observed,  that  clergymen  of  old,  and  at  this  time  in  popish  countries, 
use  not  marks  of  cadency  in  their  arms,  because  they  are  not  supposed  to  have 
issue. 

The  lambel  was  anciently  used  on  the  seal  of  arms  of  the  princes  of  Flanders; 
GuiDO,  second  son  of  William  Lord  Dampetra,  and  his  lady,  Margaret,  daughter 
of  Baldwin  Earl  of  Flanders,  carried  a  shield  charged  with  two  leopards,  and  a 
label  of  five  points  in  chief,  in  the  year  1234.  And  the  same  Guido,  after  his 
eldest  brother's  death,  had  a  label  only  of  three  points,  his  father  then  being  in 
life,  and  he  the  eldest  living  son;  but  upon  his  father's  death  he  laid  the  label  aside 
altogether.  Robert,  the  eldest  son  of  this  Guido,  continued  the  same  practice  as 
did  their  successors  Earls  of  Flanders,  as  by  their  seals  given  us  by  Oliverus  Ure- 
dus,  De  Si^illis  Comilum  Flandrice. 

The  ancientest  use  of  the  lambel  in  England  is  said,  by  some  heralds,  to  have 
been  borne  by  Geoffrey  Duke  of  Bretagne  and  Earl  of  Richmond,  fourth  son  of 
King  Henry  U.  who  was  crowned  1153,  viz.  ^ides,  three  lions  passant giudant  or, 
a  label  of  five  points  argent.  But  Mr  Sandford,  in  his  Genealogical  History  of 
England,  says,  He  beheves  that  this  filial  distinction,  the  lambel,  was  not  so  soon 
used  in  England  ;  and  he  makes  Edmund  Earl  of  Lancaster,  second  son  of  King 
Henry  III.  and  brother  to  Edward  I.  by  his  seal  of  arms,  to  be  the  first  who  car 
ried  over  the  arms  of  England  a  lambel  of  three  points  azure,  charged  with  flower- 
de-luces  6r,  upon  the  account  the  flower-de-luces  were  his  wife's  figures,  she  being 
a  daughter  of  France. 

Though  the  lambel  be  a  brisure  in  itself,  they  were  anciently  in  use  to  charge 
them  with  figures,  when  carried  by  younger  sons,  as  they  have  done  the  bordure, 
to  show  their  maternal  descent,  and  other  dignities.  The  family  of  Lancaster 
for  a  long  time  had  ahvays  their  lambel  azure,  charged  with  flower-de-luces,  upon 
the  account  above  mentioned ;  and  the  House  of  York  had  their  lambels  argent, 
charged  with  torteauxes  gules,  to  show  their  descent  from  the  Briton,  Tudor  Earl 
of  Cornwall,  who  carried  such  figures.  As  for  the  variation  of  the  labels  by  the 
other  branches  of  the  royal  family  of  England,  I  have  given  an  account  at  the  end 
of  tbe  First  Part  of  this  System  of  Heraldry. 

Several  English  writers,  as  Gerard  Leigh,  among  the  first  of  them,  tell  us,  That 
the  eldest  son's  label  should  have  only  three  points,  the  one  to  intimate  his  father 
in  life,  the  other  his  mother,  and  the  third  himself;  and  that  if  the  grandfather 
be  alive,  the  label  should  have  five  points :  But  I  find  it  otherwise  by  the  ancient 
practice  of  the  royal  family  of  England,  by  their  seals  of  arms,  given  us  by  the 
above-mentioned  Sandford.  Prince  Edward,  the  eldest  son  of  Henry  III.  who 
was  afterwards  King  Edward  I.  while  he  was  prince,  had  on  the  one  side  of  his 
seal  the  arms  of  England,  with  a  label  of  three  points,  and,  on  the  reverse,  with  a 
lambel  of  five  points,  in  the  year  1267,  when  he  had  no  grandfather  living:  And 
the  same  lambels  of  three  and  five  points  were  upon  the  seals  of  the  succeeding 
princes,  eldest  sons  of  Edward  II.  and  III.  So  that  Gerard  Leigh's  account  did  not 
hold  then  in  England. 

The  lambel  has  been  so  carried,  with  three  points  plain,  by  the  eldest  sons  of 
France,  and  by  the  younger  sons  with  more  points,  variegated  with  different  charges. 
With  us,  the  plain  lambel  with  three  points  is  seldom  assigned  to  younger  brothers, 
but  when  the  heirs-male  of  the  eldest  brother  fails,  and  the  inheritance  falls  to  his 
daughters  and  their  heirs,  the  younger  brother  and  his  issue  may  then  use  the 
plain  lambel  of  three  points,  as  the  heir  of  expectancy ;  of  which  before,  in  the 
First  Part  of  this  System,  page  384.  so  carried  by  Hamilton  Earl  of  Abercorn 
over  the  arms  of  Hamilton.  By  which  practice  the  plain  label  in  this  case  seems 
to  be  hereditary,  when  carried  by  younger  sons  and  their  heirs-male.  And  the 
same  practice  was  used  by  a  younger  brother  of  the  House  of  Nithsdale.  who 
married  the  heiress  of  the  Lord  Herries,  quartered  his  paternal  coat,  argent,  a  saltier 
sable  and  in  chief  a  lambel  gules;  v.ith  the  coat  of  Herries,  viz.  argent,  three 
urcheons  sable :  And  which  arms  continued  with  his  successors  after  the  same 


S  OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  ^r. 

iiiiiiinei-  Arbui-hnot  of  Findowrie,  a  second  son  of  the  family  of  A rbuthnot,  car- 
ried always  a  label  for  his  difference. 

1  shall  add  here  what  the  authorof  Jiirisprud.  Ha.  dc  Jure  Belgariim,  says  of  the 
use  of  the  label.  When  the  label  is  hereditary  and  fixed  as  other  figures,  which 
the  father  carries,  his  eldest  son  and  successor  must  carry  the  same;  and  if  it  be  a 
label  of  three  points,  the  second  son  may  carry  one  of  four  point-,  and  the  third 
son  one  of  five  points,  and  the  fourth  son  a  label  of  six  points,  and  no  further,  for 
the  label's  points  can  be  no  more  multiplied.  And  this  is  practised  also  by  the 
i''rench,  as  well  as  by  the  Flandrians. 

The  other  principal  difference,  the  batum,  before  mentioned,  being  almost  the 
same  with  the  bendlet,  cottise,  and  ribbon,  of  which  I  have  treated  in  the  First 
Part  of  this  System,  chap.  13.  as  being  diminutives  of- the  said  bend;  and  have 
distinguished  them  as  to  their  use,  that  is,  when  the  field  is  filled  with  bendlets, 
and  when  two  cottises  accompany  a  bend,  then  they  are  no  marks  of  cadency ; 
but  when  there  is  only  one  of  them  surmounting  the  arms,  it  is  called  a  button,  and 
i,  an  ancient  mark  of  cadency:  As  that  in  the  old  arms  of  Abernethy,  of  which 
before,  where  the  batton,  or  ribbon,  by  some  so  called,  surmounts  and  bruises  the 
lion. 

I  shall  give  here  two  instances  of  its  practice  of  old  as  a  brisure,  first,  Henry, 
second  son  of  Henry  III.  carried  the  arms  of  England,  surmounted  of  a  bendlet 
azure,  for  his  difference;  and  when  he  succeeded  his  elder  brother  in  the  earldom 
of  Lancaster,  in  the  reign  of  Edward  II.  he  laid  aside  the  bendlet,  and  carried,  as 
his  father  and  brother,  over  the  leopards  of  England,  a  label  of  three  points  azure, 
each  charged  with  flower-de-luces.  The  other  instance  of  a  bendlet  as  a  brisure, 
Olivarius  LFredus  gives  us  in  the  arms  of  Guido,  second  son  of  William  Lord  Dam- 
petra,  and  his  lady,  Margaret  Countess  of  Flanders,  who  carried  the  arms  of  Dam- 
petra,  two  leopards  bruised,  with  a  bendlet  for  diflerence,  in  the  year  1 251,  which 
he  laid  aside  when  he  succeeded  his  elder  brother  William. 

It  is  to  be  minded,  that  when  the  eldest  son  dies  without  issue,  the  second  son  is 
then  successor,  and  carries  the  plain  arms  of  his  father,  as  Cbass.  Cat.  Gloi .  Mund. 
Part.  I.  "  Primogenito  sine  hberis  decedente,  arma  Integra  ad  secundo  genitum 
"  devolveret  ita  deinceps." 

The  batton  is  now-a-days  ordinarily  couped,  that  is,  touches  not  the  angles  of 
the  shield,  and  is  used  very  short  by  the  French,  which  they  call  baton  peri.  The 
Latin  heralds  give  the  words  Jijfura  and  bacculus,  commonly  for  a  batton.  Syl- 
vester Petra  Sancta  calls  it  clabilla,  a  httle  club,  and  sometimes  clavulu.  In  his 
68th  chapter,  De  Clavula  'isS  de  Stamine  Tesserario,  where  he  says,  "  Vectis  &  bacil- 
"  lus  scutarius  forniae  teres,  &-  ejus  tantum  latitudinis,  ut  trientem  baltei  non  ex- 
"  cedat,  hie  inquam  vectis,  seu  bacillus,  etiam  ipse  a  primogenitis,  turn  liberos 
"  natu  minores,  tum  eorum  posteritatem  distinguit." 

It  is,  and  has  been  the  constant  custom  of  France,  to  distinguish  younger  sons 
by  battons ;  Thus  Monsieur  Robert  of  France,  Count  of  Clermont,  younger  son 
of  Lewis  IX.  of  France,  carried  France  bruised  with  a  baton  peri  gtdes.  He  mar- 
ried Beatrix,  daughter  and  heiress  to  John  Lord  Bourbon,  whose  eldest  son  carried 
the  foresaid  bearing,  from  whom  issued  the  noble  family  of  Bourbon,  of  whom  the 
present  monarch  of  France  is  descended.  The  baton  peri  is  freqvient  with  the 
French,  as  the  author  of  yurisprude/itia  Heroica  s^yi,  "  Insignia  seu  regale  Bour- 
"  bonium  stemma  discriminavit,  clavula  nempe  coccinea,  seu  fusti  scutario,  vulgo 
"  le  baston  de  gueules,  qui  (non  secus  ac  taenia,  nisi  quo  multo  sit  tenuior)  a  parte 
"  dextra  in  sinistram  vergit,  heraldire,  peri  en  bande."  The  second  son,  James 
Count  de  la  March,  who  married  the  heiress  of  Vendosme,  did  also  bear  the  fore- 
said coat;  but  charged  the  batton  (for  a  sub-brisure)  with  the  figures  of  Vendosme, 
viz.  three  lions  argent;  and  the  other  younger  sons  of  this  family  diflerenced  their 
battons  with  other  figures,  as  Bourbon  Monpensier  placed  on  the  top  of  his  batton 
a  canton  charged  with  a  dolphin  azure;  and  Bourbon  d'Ev£REux  has  his  batton 
componed,  argent  and  gules. 

I  seldom  or  never  find  with  us,  and  the  Enghsh,  a  batton  couped  made  use  of 
by  younger  lawful  sons,  because,  as  to  those  that  know  not  the  science,  it  looks  like 
a  mark  of  illegitimatidn.     The  batton  sinister  I  have  treated  of  before,  in  the  14th 


OF  ADDITIONx^L  FIGURES,  l^c.  9 

chapter  of  the  First  Part  of  this  System,  and  shall  here  treat  of  it  again,  with  other 
marks  of  illegitimation  ;  but  first  of  fhe  bonlure. 

The  bordure,  the  third  mark  of  cadency  above  mentioned,  goes  round  the  ex- 
tremities of  the  shield,  and  takes  up  the  fifth  part  of  the  field,  by  the  English  ; 
by  our  practice,  sometimes  less,  sometimes  more,  according  as  it  suits  with  the 
figures  within  the  shield,  and  the  figures  that  charge  the  bordure.  Part  I.  chap. 
18. 

By  all  nations  it  is  frequently  used  as  a  brisure  ;  and  especially  by  the  English, 
who  do  not  look  upon  it  as  a  principal  figure,  or  one  of  the  honourable  ordinaries, 
but  a  principal  diflerence;  and  is  never  to  be  found,  say  they,  in  a  coat  of  arms, 
but  when  it  stands  for  a  mark  of  cadency.  By  the  French  it  is  looked  upon  as  a 
principal  figure,  and  not  a  mark  of  cadency ;  but  when  the  bordure  is  less  than  its 
just  quantity,  and  of  metal  upon  metal,  or  colour  upon  colour,  it  is  called  by 
them  ■dfdlier.  With  us  the  boidure,  as  with  the  French,  is  sometimes  a  principal 
figure,  and  sometimes  taken  for  a  mark  of  cadency,  and  that  very  frequently;  but 
with  the  French,  and  with  us  of  old,  for  a  principal  figure. 

For  the  antiquity  of  the  bordure,  as  a  principal  figure,  in  an  old  edition  of  the 
Chronicle  of  St  Lewis,  by  Joinville,  he  there  says,  That  Charlemagne  gave  arms  to 
Arnold  de  Comesing  Viscount  de  Cozerans,  which  were  only  or,  a  bordure  gules, 
for  his  good  services  in  Spain.  Here  it  could  not  be  but  a  principal  figure,  since 
there  are  none  other  but  itself.  The  Kings  of  Portugal  carry  their  imperial  en- 
,sign  within  a  bordure,  charged  with  towers  or  castles,  for  the  kingdom  of  Algarve, 
which  Alphonsus  III.  got  from  the  king  of  Castile,  upon  the  account  he  married 
his  daughter  in  the  year  1278.  The  bordure  is  not  taken  for  a  mark  of  cadency 
in  the  armorial  bearings  of  the  Spaniards,  who  use  to  have  more  than  one  or  two 
bordures,  but  as  principal  figures,  or  essential  parts  of  the  bearing,  representing 
some  victory  over  the  Moors,  Goths,  and  other  barbarous  invaders  of  their  country, 
as  John  Baptista  Christyn,  in  his  yurisprudentia  Heroica,  Art.  5.  his  words  are, 
"  Qtiod  ad  aliarum  attinet  famiharum  margines  &  limbos,  non  adeo  sunt  discrimi- 
"  nis  notas,  quam  scuti  partes  essentiales,  lis  tot  Victorias  a  Mauris,  Gothis,  coe- 
"  terisque  barbaris  reportatas,  aliaque  id  genus  decora  significantes."  The  same 
author,  in  his  Supplement  to  his  First  Part,  tells  us.  That  ordinarily  the  Spaniards, 
and  those  of  the  Netherlands,  have  their  mothers'  figures,  charging  a  bordure 
round  their  own  arms,  not  as  a  brisure,  but  to  show  their  marriage  or  maternal 
descent.  His  words  are,  "  Limbi  apud  Hispanos  connubia  designant,  &-  quemad- 
"  modum  apud  Belgas  &-  Gallos  insignia  exponuntur."  For  which  he  gives  us  the 
instance  of  Alphonsus  III.  before  mentioned.  And  the  Guzmani,  in  Spain,  have 
round  their  arms,  by  marrying  with  the  family  of  Villamicares,  a  bordure  charged 
with  castles  and  hons ;  which  is  also  given  in  taille  douce  by  Sylvester  Petra 
Sancta,  page  599. 

One  of  the  ancientest  and  greatest  families  with  us,  the  Dunbars  Earls  of 
March,  without  question  the  principal  family  of  the  name,  carried  gules,  a  lion 
rampant  argent,  within  a  bordure  of  the  same,  charged  with  roses  of  the  first. 

The  honourable  and  ancient  family  of  Maule  Earls  of  Panmure  have  always 
been  in  use  to  carry  parted  per  pale,  argent  and  gules,  a  bordure  charged  with 
escalops,  all  counterchanged  of  the  same ;  being  the  same  which  their  pro^renitors 
had  in  the  kingdom  of  France:  of  which  more  particularly  in  the  following  cliap- 
ter.     So  much  for  the  bordure  as  a  principal  figure. 

As  it  is  an  additional  figure,  and  mark  of  cadency,  I  have  spoken  to  it  before  in 
all  its  varieties,  and  given  examples  by  whom  carried ;  and  here  I  shall  add  others, 
whom  I  have  not  before  mentioned,  with  some  new  observations. 

When  the  bordure  is  made  by  plain  lines,  and  not  charged  with  figures,  and  of 
the  tincture  of  the  principal  figure  in  the  field,  it  then  shows  the  bearer  to  be  a 
younger  son  of  the  principal  family. 

Mr  Thomas  Hope  of  Rankeilor,  Advocate,  second  lawful  son  to  Sir  John  Hope 
of  Graigiehall,  azure,  a  cheveron  or,  betwixt  three  besants,  all  within  a  bordure  of 
the  second;  crest,  a  broken  globe  surmounted  of  a  rainbow,  proper:  motto.  At 
spes  infraBa.     L.  R.  and  Plate  of  Achievements. 

James  Banmantyne  of  Kelly,  a  second  son  of  the  family  of  Karnes,  bears  the 
arms  of  the  family,  viz..  gules,  a  cheveron  argent,  betwixt  thi-ee  mullets  or,  (and. 

Vol.  II.  C 


10  OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  ^c. 

for  his  filial  difference)  within  a  bordure  of  the  second ;  crest,  a  griffin's  head 
erased,  proper:  motto,  Non  cito  mn  tarda \  as  in  the  Lyon  Register. 

John  Macartney  of  Auchinleck,  in  Scotland,  now  Esq.  and  residenter  in  Ire- 
land, argent,  a  stag  tripping  gides,  attired  or,  within  a  bordure  of  the  second ;  crest, 
a  dexter  hand  holding  a  slip  of  a  rose  tree,  proper :  motto,  Stimulat  sed  ornat. 
L.  R. 

Alexander  Scott  of  Sinton,  a  second  son  of  Scott  of  Harden,  bears  or,  on  a 
bend  azure,  a  star  of  six  points  betwixt  two  crescents  of  the  field ;  and,  on  the 
sinister  chief  point,  a  rose  gules,  stalked  and  barbed  vert,  all  within  a  bordure  sable; 
crest,  a  crescent  argent;  with  the  motto.  Crescendo  prosim.     L.  R. 

Scott  of  Galashiels,  a  younger  brother  of  Scott  of  Sinton,  carries  the  same  arms, 
but,  for  his  difference,  charges  the  bordure  with  six  escalops  argent,  for  marrying 
a  daughter  of  Pringle  of  Galashiels;  crest,  a  lady  from  the  waist  richly  attired, 
holding  in  her  right  hand  a  rose,  all  proper:  motto,  Prudenter  amo.     L.  R. 

When  the  boidure  is  formed  by  uneven  or  crooked  lines,  such  as  ingrailed,  in- 
vected,  indented,  embattled,  and  other  such  lines,  which  I  have  described  before  in 
the  First  Part  of  this  System,  it  shows  the  bearers  to  be  descended  of  the  third  or 
fourth  son  of  a  family. 

Thomas  Lidderdale,  Merchant,  citizen  of  London,  son  to  the  deceased  Robert 
Lidderdale,  a  younger  son  of  St  Mary's  Isle  in  Scotland,  bears,  azure,  a  cheveron 
ermine,  within  a  bordure  ingrailed  argent;  crest,  an  eagle's  head  erased,  proper: 
motto,  Perbelle  qui  preevidet.     L.  R. 

John  Greig  of  Ballingrie,  gules,  three  dexter  hands  couped  and  disposed  bend- 
ways  ^r^f;;/,  1  and  I,  within  a  bordure  ingrailed  of  the  second;  crest,  a  right 
hand  :  motto,  Signantur  cuncla  nianu.     L.  R. 

Donald  M'Gilchrist  of  Northbar,  gules,  a  lion  rampant  argent,  within  a  bordure 
invected  of  the  last;  crest,  a  lion's  paw  bend- ways  argent:  motto,  Cogit  in  hostem. 
L.R. 

Lundin  of  Auchtermemy,  descended  from  the  family  of  Lundin,  carries  the  old 
coat  of  Lundin,  viz.  paly  of  six  pieces,  argent  and  gules,  on  a  bend  azure,  three 
cushions  or,  all  within  a  bordure  indented  of  the  third;  crest,  a  hand,  proper, 
holding  a  cushion  argent:  motto,  Tarn  genus  quam  virtus.     L.  R. 

Colonel  George  Hamilton,  second  lawful  son  to  Redhouse,  (vi'hose  great-grand- 
father, the  laird  of  Redhouse,  was  one  of  the  Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice, 
and  second  brother  to  the  laird  of  Priestfield,  afterwards  Earl  of  Haddington) 
bears  gules,  on  a  cheveron,  betwixt  three  cinquefoils  ermine,  a  buckle  azure,  all 
within  a  bordure  embattled  or,  charged  with  eight  thistles  vert,  flowered  gules; 
crest,  two  hands  conjoined,  issuing  out  of  a  cloud,  and  within  two  branches  of 
laurel,  disposed  in  orle,  proper:  motto,  Prastando  prasto;  recorded  the  29th  of 
March  1694  in  the  Lyon  Register. 

A  bordure  formed  on  the  inner  side,  as  those  above,  by  a  line  crooked  like  a 
wave  of  the  sea,  is  called  a  bordure  waved ;  as  that  in  the  arms  of  Hamilton  of 
Ladylands,  a  cadet  of  Torrence,  descended  of  the  House  of  Hamilton,  gules,  a 
mullet  betwixt  three  cinquefoils,  all  within  a  bordure  waved  argent.     L.  R. 

Hamilton  of  Westburn,  descended  of  the  family  of  Torrence,  descended  of  the 
family  of  Hamilton,  gules,  three  cinquefoils  ermine,  within  a  bordure  potent  and 
counter-potent  of  the  second  and  first ;  crest,  a  hand  grasping  a  lance  in  bend, 
proper:  motto,  Et  nrma  et  virtus.     L.  R.  and  Plate  of  Achievements. 

Crawfurd  of  Cartsburn,  gules,  a  fesse  ennine,  betwixt  three  mullets  in  chief 
argejit,  and  in  base  two  swords  saltier- ways ;  for  a  brotherly  difference  he  had  a 
crescent  surmounted  of  a  crescent ;  and,  in  lieu  thereof  now,  for  his  difference,  he 
carries  the  above  blazon  within  a  bordure  waved  argent;  crest,  a  sword  in  pale, 
having  a  pair  of  balances  on  the  point,  all  proper:  motto,  ^/od  tibi,  boc  alteri. 
L.  R.  and  cut  in  Plate  of  Achievement,  Part  I. 

The  more  the  bordures  are  varied  from  plain  ones,  by  accidental  forms,  and 
charged  with  figures,  they  show  the  bearers  to  be  the  further  removed  from  the 
principal  House;  as  also,  when  componed,  or  counter-componed,  or  divided  by  the 
partition  lines:  To  which  purpose  are  the  words  of  the  author  of  Jurisprudentia 
Heroica,  "  Tertio  geniti  fihus  primus  paternum  retinet  limbum;  secundus  limbum 
•  "  praeferet  dentatum ;  a  la  bordure  edcntee;  tertius  besantiis  nummis  insignitum. 


OF  ADDITIONAL  HGURES,  i^c.  1 1 

"  d  la  bordure  chnrgee  dc  besans i  quartus  sectionibiis  diversi  colons  distinctum,  d 
"  In  bu!  duf:  covi:>'jnee,  &-  ita  de  caeteris."  0£  the  bordure  compone  1  shall  here 
treat  more  paiticila^ly. 

The  bordure  compone,  as  the  French  say,  and  gobonated  by  the  English,  is  when 
the  bordure  or  any  other  .igure  is  filled  with  one  rank  of  square  pieces,  alternately 
oi"  netal  and  colour,  as  that  going  round  the  arms  of  Lundin  of  that  Ilk,  to  be 
seen  Plate  XVil.  in  the  First  Fart  of  this  System. 

This  bordure  was  of  old  honourable,  but  of  late  fallen  into  disgrace :  how  it 
came,  I  cannot  give  a  particular  account,  but  shall  here  give  my  observes  of  its 
use. 

Philip  Duke  of  Burgundy,  surnamed  the  Hardy,  the  youngest  lawful  son  of 
John  King  of  France,  siuTounded  the  arms  of  France  with  a  bordure  gobonated, 
argent  and  gules,  which  were  the  ensigns  of  Burgundy  modern  ;  and  so  stands  yet 
quartered  with  Burgundy  ancient,  bendy  of  six,  or  and  gules,  within  a  bordure  of 
tile  last :  Which  arms  have  been  marshalled  with  these  of  Spain,  and  has  prece- 
dency of  all  the  other  arms  of  dukedoms  and  provinces  marshalled  in  the  achieve- 
ment of  that  kingdom. 

The  first  bordure  compone,  or  gobonated,.  I  find-  in  England,  was  used  by  the 
children  of  John  of  Gaunt  Duke  of  Lancaster,  fourth  son  of  Edward  UI.  pro- 
create on  Katharine  Roet,  \vidow  of  Sir  Otes  Swinford,  in  the  lifetime  of  his 
former  wives.  This  Katharine  he  married  last,  (as  Sandford  in  his  Genealogical 
History)  but  could  not  free  his  three  sons,  John,  Henry,  and  Thomas,  begot  upon 
her,  from  bastardy,  till  he  obtained  an  act  of  Parhament  for  their  legitimation ; 
and  before  that  act  of  legitimation,  which  was  obtained  the  20th  year  of  the  reign 
of  Richard  II.  the  three  brothers,  says  Sandford,  carried,  parted  per  pale,  argent 
and  azure;  over  all,  on  a  htni  gules,  three  lions  passant  gardant  or,  the  figures  of 
England.  The  first  brother  differenced  his  arms  with  a  lambel;  the  second,  the 
same  arms  by  a  crescent ;  and  the  third,  Thomas,  by  a  mullet.  But  after  the  act 
of  legitimation  of  these  three  brothers,  says  our  author,  their  distinction  of  bastardy 
was  discontinued;  which,  it  seems,  was  their  placing  their  father's  arms  on  a  bend, 
and  the  field  of  two  tinctures :  For  John  Beaufort,  the  eldest,  was  Earl  of  Somer- 
set,, and  after  the  legitimation  did  bear  the  arms  of  France  and  England  quarterly, 
within  a  bordure  gohone,  argent  and  azure.  The  second  brother,  Henry  Beau- 
fort, Cardinal  and  Bishop  of  Winchester,  carried  the  same  arms  with  his  elder 
brother:  And  the  last,  Thomas,  had  a  bordure  gohone,  ermine  laxdi  azure :  But 
when  he  was  made  Duke  of  Exeter,  he  made  his  bordure  round  the  arms  of 
England,  gohone,  argent  and  azure;  the  last  charged  with  flower-de-luces,  because 
hemarried  the  daughter  of  Holland  Duke  of  Exeter,  and  whose  bordure  was  azu7'e, 
seme  of  flower-de-luces  or.  Those  brothers  were  surnamed  Beauforts,  from  the  castle 
of  Beaufort  in  Anjou,  where  they  were  born,  and  used  the  portcullis  of  that  castle 
for  their  badge ;  which  figure,  with  these  of  tiie  thistle  and  rose,  the  badges  of 
Scotland  and  England,  are  yet  to  be  seen  upon  old  buildings  with  us,  since  the 
marriage  of  King  James  I.  of  Scotland  with  Jean,  daughter  of  John  Beaufort  Earl 
of  Somerset.  And  her  arms  being  the  same  with  her  father's,  before  blazoned,  are 
so  illuminated  in  our  old  books  of  blaxons.  The  bordure  compone,  or  gobonated, 
was  Iwked  on  then  as  an  honourable  figure  to  distinguish  lawful  children;  fori 
find  Humphrey  Duke  of  Gloucester,  fourth  lawful  son  of  King  Henry  IV.  of 
England,  carried  the  royal  arms  of  England,  within  a  bordure  gobonated,  argent 
axiA  sable;  which  bordure,  says  Sandford,  he  was  advised  to  take,  in  imitation  of 
that  of  the  Duki  of  Burgundy  above  mentioned,  by  Nicol  Upton  a  herald.  But 
afterwards  this  Duke  Humphrey  laid  aside  the  bordure  compone,  and  took  a  bor- 
dure argent,  as  more  honourable,  in  imitation  of  Edmond  Earl  of  Kent,  and 
Thomas  Duke  of  Gloucester,  younger  sons  of  Edward  I.  and  Edward  III.  Our 
author  says,  the  ingratitude  of  those  of  this  latter  age  to  the  memory  of  those 
illustrious  families  above  mentioned,  have  converted  the  bordure  gobone  to  no 
other  use,  than  in  distinguishing  the  illegitimate  issue  from  those  lawfully  begot- 
ten. But  this  saying  of  his  will  hardly  clear  it  from  the  aspersion  of  bastardy, 
even  by  the  instances  he  gives  us;  and  that  it  was  looked  upon  by  heralds  as 
.such;  as  by  Spelman,  in  his  Notes  upon  Nicol  Upton,  who  says,  That  in  England 
the  batton-sinister,  and  the  bordure  gobonated,  were,  of  old,  the  marks  of  illegiti- 


J  2  OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES/c?f. 

ination  in  England.  And  the  author  of  Jurisprudentia  Heroica,  Article  i2tli, 
paragraph  17th,  says  the  same  trom  Spelnian,  thus,  "  Bacillus  sinister  extrema 
"  scuti  non  attingens,  &-  fimbria  quandoque  striata,  sed  plerumque  gobiata  (ut 
"  fecialibus  fari  visum  est)  hodierns  nobis  illegitimi  notae  sunt,  &-  antiquitus 
"  etiam  fuisse  apud  Anglos  nothorum  dift'erentiam,  notatu  dignum  censens." 

Charles  Earl  of  Worcester,  Lord  Herbert  (so  dignified  by  King  Henry  Vlll.) 
was  a  natural  son  of  Henry  Beaufort  Duke  of  Somerset,  eldest  son  of  Edmund 
Duke  of  Somerset,  third  son  of  John  Beaufort  Earl  of  Somerset,  eldest  son  of  John 
of  Gaunt  Duke  of  Lancaster,  by  Katharine  Rouet  his  third  wife;  which  Charles 
bare  the  coat  of  his  fatlier,  viz.  France  and  England,  quarterly,  within  a  bordure 
^obone,  argent  and  azure,  with  the  addition  of  a  batton-sinister.  He  was  succeed- 
ed by  his  lawful  eldest  son,  who  carried  the  arms  of  his  father,  but  disused  the 
batton,  and  after,  all  the  descendants  of  this  family  were  in  use  to  do  the  same;  and 
carry  the  arms  of  France  and  England  within  a  hovAwK-  gobone ;  as  the  present 
Henry  Somerset  Duke  of  Beaufort,  sprung  from  the  above-mentioned  John  of 
Gaunt  Duke  of  Lancaster. 

The  bordure  compone,  or  gobonated,  was,  of  old,  in  great  esteem,  in  differencing 
lawful  sons  with  us;  as  by  Sir  William  Wallace  of  Ellerslie,  ^r^/^'j,  a  lion  rampant 
argent,  within  a  bordure  compone  azure,  and  of  the  second. 

It  is  used  promiscuously  in  the  arms  of  many  families  with  us,  whether  legitimate 
or  illegitimate,  as  an  honourable  brisure,  and  also  round  the  arms  of  ancient  fa- 
milies sprung  from  the  natural  sons  of  some  of  our  kings ;  as  that  carried  by 
Stewart  Earl  of  Murray,  descended  of  a  natural  son  of  King  James  V.  and  of 
late  by  Lundie,  or  Lundin,  of  that  Ilk,  as  an  honourable  additament  from  the 
crown,  who  having  laid  aside  their  old  arms,  viz.  paly  of  six  pieces,  argent  and 
gules,  surmounted  of  a  bend  azure,  charged  with  three  cushions  or,  carry  now  only 
the  arms  of  Scotland,  within  a  bordure  gobonated,  argent  and  azure,  as  sprung 
from  a  natural  issue  of  King  William  the  Lion. 

John  Lundin  of  Baldester,  whose  great-grandfather  was  a  lawful  brother  of  the 
ancient  family  of  Lundin,  assumed  the  new  coat  of  Lundie,  and  quartered  it  with 
the  old  arms  of  Lundie,  thus  recorded  in  the  Lyon  Register,  quarterly,  first  and 
fourth  the  arms  of  Scotland  within  a  bordure  gobonated,  argent  and  azure,  as  be- 
ing the  arms  granted  by  King  Charles  II.  to  the  family  of  Lundin ;  and  specially 
adapted  to  their  descent  from  Robert  of  Lundin,  natural  son  to  William  the  Lion 
King  of  Scotland,  and  brother  to  King  Alexander  II.  The  second  and  third 
quarters  are,  paly  of  six,  argent  and  gules,  on  a  bend  azure,  three  cushions  of  the 
first,  as  the  coat  formerly  used  and  borne  by  these  of  the  name,  all  with  a  bordure 
azure;  crest,  a  dexter  hand  open,  and  charged  in  the  palm  with  an  eye,  all  na- 
tural:  motto,  Certior  dutn  cerno;  so  recorded  in  the  Lyon  Register,  14th  January 
1698. 

This  bordure  has  not-  only  been  used  by  the  issue  of  bastards,  (of  which  I  could 
give  several  instances)  but  even  by  bastards  themselves;  so  that  the  bordure  go- 
bonated is  become  more  suspicious  of  being  a  sign  of  illegitimation  than  any  other 
figure  in  heraldry,  except  the  batton  sinister. 

The  natural  sons  of  King  Charles  II.  and  King  James  VII.  have  been  in  use  to 
carry  the  arms  of  Britain  within  such  bordures ;  as  Charles  Duke  of  Richmond, 
natural  son  to  King  Charles  II.  carries  Britain,  within  a  bordure  gobonated,  argent 
and  gules,  on  the  first  roses  of  the  second. 

James  Duke  of  Berwick,  natural  son  to  King  James  VII.  carried  the  arms  of 
Britain  within  a  bordure  compone,  gules  and  azure;  the  first  charged  with  the  lions 
of  England,  and  the  second  with  the  flower-de-luces  of  France:  And  so  much  for 
the  bordure  compone,  or  gobonated.  I  proceed  to  other  bordures,  composed  of 
more  than  one  range  or  tract  of  square  pieces  of  difierent  tinctures,  which  have 
never  been  attached  as  any  sign  of  illegitimation  by  birth  or  descent,  but  have 
everywhere  been  used  as  regular  and  honourable  brisures,  so  far  as  I  know. 

Bordure  counter-compone,  which  some  call  counter-gobone,  and  the  French  call  it 
often  echiquete  of  deux  traits:  It  consists  only  of  two  ranges  or  tracts  of  square 
pieces,  alternately  of  different  tinctures,  and  is  always  carried  as  a  brisure  or  mark 
of  cadency  for  lawful  younger  brothers  and  their  issue. 


OF  ADDITIONAL  nCURES,  Wc.  ij 

John  Carmichael,  Portioner  of  Little-Blackbuin,  as  descended  of  Carmichael 
of  that  Ilk,  carries  rt;y«i;,  a  fesse  wreathed,  azun- and  ^u/cs ;  and,  for  his  dilfer- 
ence,  within  a  bordure  crmnter-compMi  of  the  second  and  first.     Lyon  Register. 

Mr  James  Garden,  sometime  mmister  of  the  gospel  at  Balmerino,  descended  of 
the  family  of  Garden  of  Leys,  argent,  a  boar's  head  erased  sable,  betwixt  three 
cross  croslets  fitched  gules,  all  within  a  borduie  counter-componed  of  the  second 
and  first;  crest,  a  rose  slipped,  jvoper:  motto,  Siutine,  dbstiiu-.     L.  R. 

Bordure  cheque  consists  of  three  ranges  or  tracts  of  square  pieces,  alternatively 
of  metal  and  colour.  There  are  many  good  families  with  us,  who,  as  cadets, 
brise  their  chief's  arms  with  this  bordure;  of  whom  I  have  given  several  examples 
in  the  First  Part  of  this  System,  and  shall  here  add  t\\  o. 

Leslie  of  Findvassie  carried  the  quartered  arms  of  the  Earl  of  Rothes,  within  a 
bordure  cheque,  gules  and  or.     L.  R. 

John  Irvine  of  Kingoussie,  descended  of  Drum,  bears  two  coats ;  quarterly, 
first  argent,  tliree  holly  branches,  each  consisting  of  as  many  leaves,  proper,  hmwl- 
ed  gules,  within  a  bordure  cheque  vert,  and  of  the  first,  for  the  name  of  Irvine; 
second  argent,  an  eagle  displayed  sable,  for  Ramsav ;  third  as  second,  fourth  as 
first.     L.  R. 

The  more  the  bordure  is  varied  from  plain  ones,  of  which  we  have  given  ex- 
amples, the  more  they  show  their  bearers  to  be  removed  from  their  principal  house: 
As  likewise,  the  bordures  which  are  divided  by  the  partition  lines,  as  parted  per 
pale,  per  fesse,  bend  dexter,  and  sinister,  are  suitable  differences  of  cadets;  of 
which  I  have  given  examples  in  the  First  Part  of  this  System. 

The  bordure  is  often  charged  with  small  figures,  such  as  crescents,  besants, 
martlets.  &c.  frequently  taken,  especially  by  the  younger  sons,  some  of  them  be- 
ing the  figures  of  their  mother's  arms,  to  show  their  descent,  and  to  difference 
themselves  from  their  elder  brothers,  by  charging  their  bordures. 

The  cheveron,  counted  by  some,  as  aforesaid,  one  of  the  principal  differences,  is 
never  carried  in  a  coat  of  arms,  but  to  difference  the  bearer  from  the  chief.  This 
does  not  hold  in  our  practice,  nor  in  that  of  the  French ;  but  sometimes  it  is  car- 
ried as  a  principal  and  essential  figure,  and  one  of  the  ordinaries,  to  difference  one 
principal  family  from  another.  Of  its  form  and  signification  I  have  treated  before, 
in  the  First  Part  of  this  System. 

It  cannot  be  denied  but  it  is  often  used  with  us  and  other  nations  as  a  mark  of 
cadency,  to  distinguish  younger  sons  from  the  principal  family,  and  cadets  from 
one  another. 

It  has  been  carried  as  a  principal  and  essential  figure  by  the  ancient  surname 
of  Fleming,  of  which  before;  and  by  the  surname  of  Hepburn,  and  several 
others. 

The  cheveron,  as  I  said,  is  very  frequently  made  use  of  as  a  principal  or  dif- 
ferencing figure  by  us:  Yea,  there  is  no  principal  figure  in  armory,  whether  pro- 
per or  natural,  but  has  been  added  by  cadets  to  the  principal  bearing  of  their  fa- 
milies. I  shall  add  two  or  three  instances  of  the  cheveron  being  carried  as  a  mark 
of  cadency. 

It  is  said  by  heralds,  especially  the  English,  that  it  represents  the  couples  or 
rafters  of  a  house,  such  as  wrights  set  on  the  highest  part  of  the  house,  which  is 
not  complete  till  it  be  set  up;  for  which  they  Latin  the  cheveron,  tignum:  In 
which  sense.  Gordon  Earl  of  Aboyne,  third  son  to  George  Marquis  of  Huntlv,  for 
his  difference,  took  a  cheveron,  and  so  carries,  azure,  a  cheveron  betwixt  three 
boars'  heads  couped,  within  a  double  tressure,  flowered  with  flower-de-luces  within, 
and  adorned  with  crescents  without,  or ;  and,  for  motto,  took  these  words,  Slant 
Cietna  f'l^no,  to  show  himself  a  cadet  by  the  cheveron.  Hay  of  Seafield,  descend- 
ed of  Hay  of  Fudy,  who  was  a  son  of  the  House  of  Errol,  argent,  a  cheveron  be- 
twixt three  escutcheons  f///f/.  When  the  cheveron  is  of  the  tincture  of  the  prin- 
cipal figures,  such  as  the  escutcheons  last  mentioned,  which  accompanies  the  che- 
veron, it  shows  the  bearer  to  be  more  near  the  chief  house  than  those  cadets  who 
carry  the  cheveron  of  a  different  tincture  from  the  principal  figures.  And  the 
same  may  be  ^aid  of  all  the  other  ordinaries,  when  they  are  added  by  cadets  to  the 
arms  of  their  chiefs  for  differences. 

Vol.  II.  D. 


14  OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  "i^c. 

I  shall  here  only  add  the  arms  of  Robert  Fullerton  of  Craighall,  Writer  to  the 
Signet,  and  Comptroller  of  his  Majesty's  Customs  at  Leith,  eldest  son  of  Robert 
Fullerton  of  Craighall,  who  was  son  of  Mr  William  Fullerton  of  Craighall,  a  third 
lawful  son  of  the  family  of  Fullerton  of  that  Ilk,  so  matriculated  in  the  Public 
Register  of  the  Lyon  Office,  and  thus  blazoned,  viz.  argent,  a  cheveron  betwixt 
three  otters'  heads  erased  gules;  crest,  a  camel's  head  and  neck  erased,  proper: 
motto.  Lux  in  tencbris;  the  crest  and  motto  of  the  chief  family.  Of  which  before, 
in  the  First  Part  of  this  System. 

The  cheveron,  when  as  a  brisure,  and  put  under  accidental  forms,  such  as  in- 
gr ailed,  invected,  &-c.  or  when  charged  with  other  figures  than  these  in  the  princi- 
pal bearing,  shoiv  the  bearers  to  be  degrees  removed  from  the  principal  house,  ex- 
cept the  figures  that  charge  the  cheveron  belonging  to  the  mother  of  the  cadet,  to 
show  what  marriage  he  came  from. 

What  I  have  said  of  the  variety  of  the  bordure,  in  differencing  descendants,  the 
same  may  be  applied  to  the  cheveron. 

Having  now  treated  of  the  label,  batton,  bordure,  and  cheveron,  as  principal 
differences  or  additional  figures,  added  by  cadets,  in  all  their  varieties,  I  now 
proceed  to  other  figures  frequently  used  to  difference  descendants  of  one  family, 
in  their  different  degrees  of  birth,  when  added  to  their  paternal  bearing. 

There  are  other  sorts  of  differences  given  us  by  heralds,  such  as  differentite  con- 
sanguineorum,  and  differentia  extraneorum;  the  differences  of  the  first  being  these 
of  consanguinity ;  which  are,  the  crescent,  mullet,  martlet,  annulet,  flower-de-luce, 
and  such  like  minute  figures,  which  are  given  to  younger  sons  whilst  they  are  in 
their  fathers'  family ;  to  show  their  primogeniture,  descent,  and  degrees  of  birth, 
when  added  to  their  paternal  l)earing.  But  it  is  to  be  observed,  when  these 
younger  sons  come  to  erect  and  be  heads  of  distinct  families,  with  issue,  they  or- 
dinarily leave  these  minute  and  petty  differences,  and  take  differentias  extraneorum, 
large  and  conspicuous  figures,  such  as  bordures,  bends,  cbeverons,  ciuarters,  &c. 
By  such  like  conspicuous  figures,  whilst  they  were  in  the  field  of  battle,  they 
were  the  more  eminently  distinguished  by  their  banners,  ensigns,  and  other  utensils 
of  war  whereon  were  their  arms. 

Having  spoken  of  some  of  those  before,  I  shall  now  proceed  to  treat  of  those 
differences  of  consanguinity,  by  some  called  the  minute  differences,  or  modern,  and 
temporary  ones. 

The  label,  of  which  before,  is  counted  one  of  them;  but  then  it  is  frequently 
only  temporary  by  the  eldest  son  during  the  father's  life,  and  seldom  is  carried  by 
the  second  son  as  hereditary,  unless  when  the  fortune  of  his  eldest  brother  goes  off 
with  the  inheritance  of  the  family  to  his  daughter;  of  which  before. 

The  second  son  (his  elder  brother  continuing)  adds  a  crescent  to  his  paternal 
coat  for  difference,  (and  some  heralds  tell  us,  that  this  figure,  as  the  other  figures 
following,  hath  a  symbolical  sense  and  representation)  to  put  him  in  mind  to  in- 
crease in  fortune  and  honour.  The  third  son  carries  a  mullet,  (which  properly 
signifies  a  spur-rowel,  though  some  take  it  for  a  star)  to  incite  him  to  chivalry. 
The  fourth  a  martlet,  being  a  little  bird  in  armories,  represented  without  feet  and. 
beak,  to  make  him  mindful  to  trust  to  the  wings  of  virtue  and  merit,  and  not  to 
his  own  legs,  having  Httle  land  to  put  his  feet  on.  The  fifth,  an  annulet,  or  ring, 
to  remember  him  to  achieve  great  actions.  And  the  sixth,  a  flower-de-luce,  to 
mind  him  of  his  country  and  prince. 

The  Italian,  Sylvester  Petra  Sancta,  takes  this  martlet  to  be  a  swallow,  when  he 
speaks  of  the  differences  of  Britain,  thus :  "  At  in  Britannice  regno  feciales  tri- 
"  buunt  secundo  genitis  addititiam  lunulam,  tertio  genitis  merulam,  similemve 
"  hirundini  aviculam,  quarto  genitis  stellulam ;  annulum  quinto  genitis,  sexto 
"  genitis  lilium. 

These  differences  are  now  frequent  with  the  English,  of  which  I  shall  add  some 
instances.  William  Cavendish  Duke  of  Newcastle,  representative  of  a  second 
son  of  Cavendish  Earl  of  Devonshire,  sable,  three  harts'  heads  cabossed  argent, 
attired  or,  with  a  crescent  in  the  centre  of  the  second,  for  difference.  The  same 
had  the  Duke  of  Schomberg  and  Lemster,  Marquis  of  Harwich,  &-c.  argent,  an 
escutcheon  sable,  over  all  a  carbuncle  of  eight  rays  or,  with  a  crescent  for  differ- 
ence.   And  the  present  Howard  Earl  of  Suffolk,  Cecil  Earl  of  Salisbury,  have 


QF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  y<-.  15 

crescents  for  their  diflerences,  and  several  others  of  the  English  nobility,  as  bj- 
the  late  English  books  of  arms.  John  Digby  Earl  of  Bristol,  descended  of  u 
third  brother,  gives  azure,  a  flower-de-luce  argent,  with  a  mullet,  for  difference,  in 
the  dexter  chief  point  of  the  second.  The  same  does  Montague  Earl  of  Sand- 
wich, of  whom  before.  George  Villiers  Duke  of  Buckingham,  argent,  on  a  cross 
gules,  five  escalops  or,  with  a  martlet  of  the  second,  in  the  dexter  canton.  James 
Bertie  Earl  of  Abingdon,  argent,  three  battering  rams,  bar-\\  ays  in  pale,  proper, 
armed  and  garnished  azure,  with  an  annulet  for  diiference,  being  a  fifth  brother, 
or  descended  of  a  fifth.  Charles  Howard,  Baron  Howard  of  Escrick,  gules,  on  u 
bend,  betwixt  six  cross  croslets  jitche  argent,  an  escutcheon  or,  thereon  a  demi- 
lion  rampant,  pierced  through  the  mouth  with  an  arrow,  within  a  double  tressure, 
counter-tlo\vered^f;//t'j-;  being  the  bearing  of  the  name  and  family  of  Howard,  and, 
as  a  cadet,  adds,  for  difterence,  a  flower-de-luce.  Most  of  the  arms  of  the  gentry 
of  England  are  stuffed  with  these  figures.  Sandford,  in  his  Genealogical  History, 
says  these  ditTerences  began  in  the  reign  of  Richard  II. 

The  same  differences  were  used  in  Holland  with  some  variation ;  the  eldest  car- 
ried as  his  father,  the  second  son  used  the  label,  third  son  a  crescent,  fourth  son 
a  mullet,  or  star,  and  so  forth,  as  John  Baptista,  in  his  Jurispnidentia,  Art.  5. 
"  In  HoUandia,  vicinisque  provinciis,  paulo  aliter  insignia  distinguuntur,  ita  ut 
"  primogenitus  vivente  patre,  aut  eo  mortuo;  secundo  genitus  tigillum,  sen  1am- 
"  bellum  retineat;  tertius  lunulam  crescentem  ;  quartus  molulam  seu  asterculum; 
"  &•  alii  qui  sequuntur  merulam,  annulum  aut  hlium  insignibus,  in  disciimen  ali- 
"  orum  adhibeant." 

The  same  practice  of  these  figures  is  to  be  found  with  us  as  with  the  English,  of 
which  I  shall  subjoin  a  few  instances.  Monteith  of  Millhall,  as  descended  of  a 
second  son  of  Monteith  of  Kerse,  carries,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  or,  a  bend 
cheque,  sable  and  argent,  for  Monteith;  second  and  third  azure,  three  buckles  or; 
and,  for  his  difference,  has  a  crescent  in  the  centre  of  the  quartered  arms,  as  in  the 
First  Part  of  this  Treatise,  and  Plate  of  Achievements. 

Robert  Udney  of  Auchterallan,  a  second  son  of  Udney  of  that  Ilk,  bears  the  arms 
of  Udney,  Viz.  gules,  two  greyhounds  counter-salient,  argent  collared  of  the  field; 
in  the  honour  point,  a  stag's  head  couped,  attired  with  ten  tynes,  all  betwixt  three 
flower-de-luces,  two  in  chief,  and  one  in  base  or;  with  a  crescent  for  his  difterence. 
And  John  Udney  of  Coultercallan,  a  third  son  of  Udney  of  that  Ilk,  carries  the  same 
arms,  with  a  mullet  for  his  difference.  Arthur  Udney,  a  fourth  son  of  the  fa- 
mily of  Udney,  bears  the  same  with  Udney  of  that  Ilk,  with  a  martlet  for  his  dif- 
ference.    As  all  of  them  in  the  Lyon  Register. 

The  annulet,  the  difterence  of  a  fifth  son,  was  made  use  of  by  Sir  William 
Hamilton  of  Whitelaw,  one  of  the  Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice,  a  fifth  sou 
of  Bangour, ^!//ej-,  a  mullet  betwixt  three  cinquefoils  argent,  on  a  chief  of  the  last,, 
an  annulet  of  the  first.  Mr  William  Hamilton  of  Orbiston,  a  younger  son  of 
James  Lord  Hamilton,  gules,  an  annulet  betwixt  three  cinquefoils  ermine.  John 
Nairne  of  Segden,  descended  of  the  House  of  Sandford,  carries,  parted  per  pale, 
sable  and  argent,  on  a  chaplet,  four  quatrefoils,  all  counterchanged ;  and,  for  his 
difference,  he  had  a  martlet.     L.  R. 

The.  flower-de-luce,  the  difference  of  a  sixth  son,  carried  by  Patrick.  Fraser  of 
Broadland,  Advocate,  descended  of  Fraser  of  Philorth,  whose  quartered  coat  he 
carries,  viz.  first  and  fourth  azure,  three  frases  argent ;  second  and  third  Sfules,  a  lion 
rampant  argent,  armed  and  langued  sable;  with  a  flower-de-luce  for  difterence. 

Alexander  Napier,  descended  of  a  sixth  son  of  Napier  of  that  Ilk,  bears 
argent,  on  a  saltier  ingrailed,  between  four  roses  gules,  a  flower-de-luce  for  differ- 
ence; crest,  a  dexter  hand  erected  per  pale,  holding  a  cxesctnt  argent :  motto. 
Sans  tache.     L.  R. 

These  are  called  the  differences  of  the  first  house,  when  made  use  of  by  sons  of 
principal  families. 

The  second  house  is  the  second  son  and  his  children.  The  eldest  son  of  the  se- 
cond house  bears  his  father's  coat,  with  such  differences  as  he  did  ;  but  if  his  fa- 
ther be  in  life,  and  his  difference  from  his  elder  brother  be  a  crescent,  then  the 
crescent  is  charged  with  a  label,  which  is  temporary  during  his  father's  life.  The 
second  son  of  the  second  liouse  a  crescent  charged  with  another  crescent,  as 
Howard  Earl  of  Berkshire,  Viscount  Andoyer,  and  Baron  Howard  of  Charles- 


i6  OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  Sit. 

ton,  second  son  of  Thomas  Howard  Earl  of  Suffolk,  who  was  descended  of  a  second 
son  of  the  Duke  of  Norfolk,  gules,  a  bend  betwixt  six  cross  cmsitls  Jiiche  argent; 
in  the  middle  of  the  bend,  on  an  escutcheon  or,  a  demi-hon  rampant,  pierced 
through  the  mouth  with  an  arrow,  within  a  double  tressure  counter-flowered  gules. 
Which  escutcheon  the  Duke  of  Norfolk  got  from  the  King  of  England,  as  an  ho- 
nourable additament  for  the  victory  he  obtained  over  the  Scots  at  Flodden.  Suf- 
folk adds  a  crescent,  as  a  second  son,  and  Berkshire  charges  it  with  another,  as  a  se- 
cond son  of  a  second  son.  With  us,  David  Forrester  of  Denoven,  a  second  son 
of  a  second  son  of  Forrester  of  Garden,  argent,  three  hunting-horns  sable,  garnished 
gules,  a  crescent  surmounted  of  another  for  difference.  Thomas  Nairne,  second 
son  to  the  deceased  William  Nairne  of  Langside,  who  also  was  a  second  son  of  the  fa- 
mily of  Sandford,  bears,  parted  per  pale,  argent  and  sable,  on  a  chaplet  four  mullets, 
all  counter-changed  ;  and,  for  a  brotherly  difference,  in  the  middle  fesse  point  a 
crescent  surmounted  of  another,  both  counter-changed  as  the  former;  crest,  a 
celestial  sphere,  or  and  azure,  standing  on  a  foot  gules :  motto,  Spes  ultra,  and  be- 
neath, rEsperance  me  comforte.     L.  R. 

The  third  son  of  the  second  house  has  the  crescent  surmounted  with  a  mullet ; 
the  fourth  son  of  that  house  with  a  martlet;  the  fifth  with  an  annulet,  and  the 
sixth  son  the  crescent,  charged  with  a  flower-de-luce. 

The  third  son  and  his  issue  makes  the  third  house.  The  difference  belonging 
thereto  is  the  mullet,  and  the  second  son  of  that  house  surmounts  it  with  a  crescent. 
William  FLw,  merchant  and  bailie  in  Edinburgh,  descended  of  the  Earl  of 
Tweeddale,  whose  quartered  coat  he  carried,  bruised  the  surtout  with  a  mullet,  sur- 
mounted of  a  crescent,  being  the  second  son  of  a  third  brother  of  that  family. 
The  third  son  of  the  third  house,  surmounts  the  mullet  with  another,  the  fourth 
son  with  a  martlet,  and  the  fifth  with  an  annulet;  as  Drummond  of  Garlowrie,  or, 
three  bars  waved  gules,  in  chief  a  mullet  of  the  last,  charged  with  an  annulet  of 
the  first. 

The  martlet,  annulet,  and  flower-de-luce,  being  charged,  as  I  have  said  of  the 
crescent  and  mullet,  are  the  diflerences  of  the  fourth,  fifth,  and  sixth  houses. 

Besides  those  six  differences,  some  heralds  add  other  three;  to  the  seventh  son 
they  give  a  rose.  With  us  several  famihes  carry  roses  for  differences,  as  younger 
sons  or  brothers.  Scott  of  Harden,  or,  on  a  bend  azure,  a  star  of  six  points  be- 
twixt two  crescents  of  the  field,  in  the  sinister  chief  point  a  rose  gules,  stalked  and 
barbed,  proper,  being  a  cadet  of  Scott  of  Sinton :  But  now  he  carries  the  coat  of 
that  family,  viz.  or,  two  mullets  in  chief,  and  a  crescent  in  base  azure.  Scott  of 
High-Ghester,  as  a  second  son  of  Harden,  the  foresaid  old  coat  of  Harden,  and  sur- 
mounts the  rose  with  a  crescent  (7/ye/i/.  ScoTT  of  Thirleton,  near  Kelso,  a  third 
son  of  Harden,  charges  the  rose  of  Harden  with  a  martlet ;  and  Scott  of  Wooll 
the  same,  with  an  annulet.  It  is  strange,  that  these  families  of  the  name  of  Scott, 
descended  of  Sinton,  should  have  carried  the  arms  of  Buccleugh,  with  additional 
figures,  and  not  added  them  to  the  arms  of  Sinton. 

Cunningham  of  Brownhill,  argent,  a  shake-fork  sable,  in  chief  a  rose  gules,  sur- 
mounted of  a  mullet  of  the  field. 

To  the  eighth  son  they  give  across  moline,  or  anchor;  and  to  the  ninth  a  double 
quatrefoil,  /.  e.  a  flower  with  eight  leaves,  to  express  that  he  is  removed  from  his 
elder  brother  and  the  succession  by  eight  degrees. 

These  distinctions,  as  we  have  said,  were  called  differences  of  consanguinity;  be- 
cause they  were  primarily  invented  for  the  use  of  younger  sons,  whilst  in  familia 
patris,  in  their  fathers'  family,  as  marks  of  their  primogeniture,  or  degrees  of  birth; 
and  not  to  distinguish  their  families,  when  erected,  distinct,  and  separate  from  the 
principal  house,  they  taking  other  regular  and  conspicuous  marks;  such  as  the 
dijferentiir  extraneorum,  of  which  immediately. 

The  differences  of  these  who  erect  new  distinct  families,  and  which  they  trans- 
mit to  their  posterity,  will  not  only  serve  to  distinguish  their  families  and  issue 
from  one  another,  but  from  the  principal  house  whereof  they  are  descended,  and  the 
time  of  their  descent,  which  can  never  be  done  by  those  minute  figures  to  the 
third  generation :  For  though  a  second  son,  descended  of  a  second  son,  take  a  cres- 
cent upon  a  crescent,  how  bi^  second  son  shall  distinguish  is  hardly  conceivable. 
And  they  are  so  far  from  showing  the  time  of  their  bearer's  descent,  that  they  can  • 


OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  ^c; 


^7 


not  distinguish  the  uncle  from  the  nephew,  that  is  the  second  brother  from  his 
eldest  brother's  second  son,  who  would  both  carry  the  same  thing  :  But  to  what 
our  worthy  countryman  Sir  George  Mackenzie  has  written  of  them,  1  refer  the 
reader.  I  shall  here  add  what  the  elaborate  Sn-  William  Dugdale,  Garter  King  at 
Arms  in  England,  has  written  in  his  book,  The  Ancient  Usage  of  Arms ;  who  says, 
"  As  for  these  minute  ones,  they  do  not  show  the  time  of  the  descent;  for  we  cannot 
"  know  which  of  the  crescent  bearers  are  the  uncle  or  nephew.  And.  further,  it 
"  is  a  very  usual  matter  for  every  new  riser  at  this  day,  that  can  find  a  man  of  his 
"  surname  that  hath  a  coat  of  arms,  presently  to  assume  it,  by  adding  a  crescent, 
"  or  any  other  of  these  minute  difterences,  which  (says  he)  I  seldom  credit  such 
"  kmd  of  ditferences,  nor  the  bearers,  unless  it  be  by  some  other  testimony,  or 
"  proof  made  manifest,  which  cannot  be  counterfeited  so  well  in  the  other  difler- 
"  ences,  except  the  assumer  should  be  thoroughly  acquainted  with  the  descent  of 
"  him  whose  line  he  seeks  to  intrude  himself  into."  We  have  reason  to  complain 
of  the  like  practice  with  us,  and  of  oar  goldsmiths,  engravers,  painters,  masons 
and  carpenters,  who  are  very  ready,  though  altogether  ignorant  of  this  science,  to 
give  to  those  who  employ  them  in  any  piece  of  v:ovk,  coats  of  arms,  with  some  of 
the  foresaid  differences ;  not  only  to  those  who  have  right  to  carry  arms,  but  even 
to  some  who  ought  not  to  be  honoured  with  armorial  bearings,  although  they  be 
of  some  ancient  surname.  To  which  irregular  and  unwarrantable  practice,  I  v/is!: 
the  Lyon  King  at  x\rms  would  put  a  stop,  by  putting  the  acts  of  Parliament  in 
execution  against  such  persons,  by  which  the  arms  of  our  old  gentry  will  be  better 
known  and  more  easily  distinguished  from  new  upstarts.  I  conclude  with  what 
Sir  Henry  Spehnan,  a  learned  herald,  has  wrote  of  these  differences,  "  Rideo 
"  igitur,  &-  rejicio  minutas  istas  iconculas,  quibus  nee  error  defuit  nee  periculum," 
I.  e.  I  therefore  smile  and  despise  these  petty  ditferences,  in  which  there  is  both 
error  and  danger. 

It  is,  and  has  been  an  ancient  custom  with  us  and  other  nations,  (since  that  a 
few  certain  differences  could  not  be  sufficient  to  distinguish  the  numerous  issues  of 
many  families,  and  suit  with  their  various  bearings)  that  all  persons  who  had  right 
to  carry  arms,  might  add  any  figures  for  differences,  which  they  affected,  being 
agreeable  with  their  paternal  bearings,  by  the  allowance  of  the  Lyon  King  at 
Arms.  So  that  not  only  the  honourable  ordinaries,  and  sub-ordinaries,  which  we 
call  proper  figures  in  heraldry,  but  even  all  other  figures,  and  representations  of 
things  natural  and  artificial,  are  made  use  of  for  marks  of  cadency;  which  some- 
times not  only  serve  to  distinguish  cadets  from  principal  famihes,  but  also  to  ex- 
press some  honourable  action,  aUiance,  or  descent,  from  other  honourable  houses, 
which  have  occasioned  many  composed  and  quartered  coats.  Of  the  last  in  the 
following  chapter. 

These  additional  figures  are  either  proper  or  natural.  The  proper  figures  are 
these  which  have  their  names  and  being  from  the  Science  of  Heraldry,  as  the 
honourable  ordinaries,  and  sub-ordinaries,  viz.  pale,  /esse,  bar,  chief,  bend-dexter, 
bend-sinister,  cross,  saltier,  and  cbeveron;  which  I  have  fully  described  in  all  their 
varieties,  and  illustrated  them  by  examples  in  the  First  Part  of  this  System..  As  also 
the  sub-ordinaries,  the  bordure,  orle,  essonier  and  tressure,  inescutcheon,  franc-quar- 
tier,  canton,  cheque,  billets  and  billet,  pairle,  point,  girons,  piles,  Jiasque,  flanque  and 
voider,  lozenge,  riistre,  mascles,  fujils,  fret  and  fretty,  besants,  torteauxes,  vires,  an- 
nulets, gutte,  papelonne  and  diapre;  of  which  I  have  treated  in  the  First  Part.  As 
also  of  the  natural  figures,  which  are  the  representation  of  all  things  animate  or 
inanimate,  and  are  called  natural,  because  they  keep  their  own  proper  names  in 
this  science,  but  have  additional  terms  from  their  positions,  dispositions,  and  situa- 
tions. 

All  these  figures,  whether  proper  or  natural,  are  sometimes  carried  as  principal, 
and  sometimes  as  additional.  By  principal  figures  we  understand  those  heredi- 
tary fixed  marks  carried  by  the  chiefs  of  families,  (which  serve  to  distinguish  chief 
families  from  one  another)  and  are  transmitted  to  all  the  descendants.  By  addi- 
tional figures,  we  understand  these,  whether  proper  or  natural,  which  cadets  add  as 
marks  of  cadency,  and  differences  to  the  principal,  hereditary,  fixed  figures  of  the 
family;  that  they  may  be  distinguished    from  the  chief,  and  from  one  another. 

Vol.  II.  E 


1 S  OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  Wc. 

which  are  called  differentia  extraneorum.  The  differences  of  these  that  are  ex- 
traneous, such  as  younger  sons,  brothers,  and  other  descendants,  extra  familiam  pa~ 
tris,  and  so  erect  new  distinct  famihes,  add  to  their  paternal  figures  one  or  other  of 
the  proper  and  natural  figures  above  mentioned,  which  I  have  given  before  in  all 
their  varieties,  both  as  principal  and  additional  figures. 

These  figures  have  been  assumed  by  cadets,  which  they  added  to  their  paternal 
bearing,  to  perpetuate  the  memory  of  some  noble  action,  lucky  event,  honourable 
employment,  or  office;  or  to  show  their  gratitude  and  acknowledgment  of  benefits 
received  from  some  honourable  friend  or  superior;  or  else  to  express  their  aUiance 
with  other  familie';. 

We  have  instances  of  differences  assumed  by  cadets  upon  such  accounts  and 
occasions,  of  which  I  shall  add  a  few  examples.  This  we  have  intimated  to  us  by 
the  additional  figure  in  the  armorial  bearing  of  Graham  of  Inchbraikie,  descended 
of  an  eldest  son  of  a  second  marriage  of  the  first  Earl  of  Montrose,  w  ho  gives  or, 
a  dike  or  wall  fesse-ways  azure,  broken  down  in  several  parts,  and  in  base  a 
rose  ^ules,  on  a  chief  sable  three  escalops  of  the  first.  The  dike  here  is  assumed 
to  difference  the  bearer  from  his  chief,  and  to  perpetuate  that  action  of  Gramus, 
(one  of  the  predecessors  of  the  noble  family  of  Graham)  in  pulling  down  the 
wall  built  by  one  of  tlie  Roman  emperors,  which  was  thereafter  called  Graham's 
Dike. 

Seaton  of  Barns,  a  second  son  of  George  Lord  Seaton,  added  to  his  paternal 
figures,  the  three  crescents,  a  sword  erect  in  pale  supporting  an  imperial  crown, 
for  his  difference,  to  perpetuate  the  special  and  seasonable  services  performed  by 
one  of  his  progenitors.  Sir  Christopher  Seaton  of  that  Ilk,  to  King  Robert  the 
Bruce ;  who  gave  these  figures  with  the  lands  of  Barns  to  Sir  Alexander  Seaton, 
son  of  Sir  Christopher,  for  his  and  his  father's  good  services ;  as  Sir  George  Mac- 
kenzie in  his  Science  of  Heraldry,  and  of  which  before,  more  fully,  in  the  First 
Part  of  this  System. 

We  have  several  instances  of  honourable  employments  and  offices  represented 
by  additional  differencing  figures,  as  in  the  bearings  of  some  of  the  surname  of 
Wood,  the  paternal  coat  being  azure,  an  oak  tree,  proper,  growing  out  of  a  mount: 
Wood  of  Balbigno,  as  descended  of  the  principal  family,  added,  for  difference, 
two  keys  tied  with  strings  to  a  branch  of  the  tree,  to  show  his  office  as  Thane  of 
Fettercairn.  And  Wood  of  Largo  placed  his  tree  betwixt  two  ships  under  sail, 
to  difference  himself  from  other  families  of  the  name,  as  being  admiral  to  King 
James  III.  and  IV. 

Forbes  of  Waterton,  descended  of  Tolquhon,  carries  over  Tolquhon's  quartered 
coat,  an  escutcheon  argent,  charged  with  a  sword,  a  key  in  saltier  gules,  as  the 
badge  of  his  office,  being  Constable  of  Aberdeen. 

These  who  were  advanced  by  kings,  princes,  or  other  great  lords,  did  many  time 
bear  their  whole  coats,  or  some  part  of  the  arms  of  those  who  advanced  them,  and 
joined  them  with  their  own  paternal  bearing ;  which  served  very  aptly,  not  only 
to  difference  them  from  the  principal  families  whereof  they  were  cadets,  but  also 
to  show  their  gratitude  and  acknowledgment  of  benefits  received  from  some  ho- 
nourable friend  or  superior;  and  by  reason  thereof  they  are  united  together  in  a 
kind  of  friendship,  and  is  a  great  strengthening  to  both  Houses.  I  shall  add  here 
what  Camden  says  in  his  Remains  of  Britain,  page  iiS.  "  Gentlemen  began  to 
"  bear  arms  by  borrowing  from  their  lords'  arms,  of  whom  they  held  in  fee,  or  to 
"  whom  they  were  most  devoted ;  so,  whereas  the  Earl  of  Chester  bare  garbs,  or 
"  v,'heat  sheaves,  many  gentlemen  of  that  country  took  wheat  sheaves.  Whereas 
"  the  old  Earls  of  Warwick  bare  cheque,  or  and  azure,  a  cheveron  ermine,  many 
''  thereabout  took  ermine  and  cheque.  In  Leicester,  and  the  country  confining, 
■'  divers  bear  cinquefoils,  for  that  the  ancient  Earls  of  Leicester  bare  gules,  a 
"  cinquefoil  ermine.  In  Cumberland,  and  thereabout,  where  the  old  Baron  of 
"  Kendal  bare  argent,  two  bars  gules,  and  a  lion  passant  or,  in  a  canton  of  the 
"  second,  many  gentlemen  thereabout  took  the  same  in  different  colours  and 
"  charges  in  the  canton."  And  as  Sir  George  Mackenzie  observes,  in  his  Science 
of  Heraldry,  page  5.  That  most  of  the  surnames  in  Annandale  carry  the  Bruges' 
arms,  being  a  saltier,  and  chief  gules,  which  the  Bruces  had  from  the  old  lords 
of  Annan  when  they  married  with  the  heiress  of  Annandale.      The  Johnstons 


OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  5^..  u, 

carry  tlie  same  figures.  The  Right  Honourable  William  ?.Iarquis  of  Annakdale 
carries  argent,  a  iAlncx  sable  on  a  c\-i\ti gules,  three  cushions  or.  The  Kirk.patr.icics. 
carry  the  same  figures  with  the  Johnstons,  but  ditier  only  in  tincture.  Sir  Thomas 
K1RK.PATRICK.  of  Cioseburn  gives  argent,  a  saltier  and  chief  azure,  the  last  charged 
with  three  cushions  or.  Jardine  of  Applegirth,  argent,  a  saltier  and  chief  gules, 
charged  with  three  mullets  of  the  first;  so  that  the  saltier  and  chief  are  armoria.1 
figures  taken  from  the  Annans,  the  old  Earls  of  Annandale. 

In  the  shire  of  Murray,  many  families  carry  stars,  the  figures  of  the  name  of 
Murray.  As  Lnn£s  of  that  Ilk,  argent,  three  stars  of  six  points  waved  azure. 
And  many  families  in  Douglasdale,  Teviotdale,  and  other  countries  which  the 
Douglases  possessed  in  property  or  superiority  carry  stars.  In  the  shires  where 
the  Stewarts,  of  old,  had  interest,  many  gentlemen  who  have  been  old  possessors 
there,  carry  fesses  chequered,  the  figure  of  the  Stewarts,  or  other  figures  cliequer- 
ed,  as  cheveroiis  and  bends. 

With  us  it  IS  a  frequent  practice  for  younger  brothers  to  add  to  their  paternal 
bearings  some  part  of  their  mothers'  arras,  to  diflference  themselv.es,  and  show  their 
alliance  with  other  famiHes.  And  these  coats  are  all  called  composed  arms,  because 
there  are  two  coats  joined  in  one  shield,  without  distinction  of  quarters.  This  v/ay 
of  difference  is  much  approven  of  by  Dugdale,  in  his  Ajicient  Use  of  Arms,  who 
recommends  this  way  to  his  countrymen .  "  For"  says  he,  "  it  not  only  serveth 
"  to  unite  the  families  who  have  matched  together  in  love  and  amity,  and  thereby 
"  workedi  the  like  etiect,  but,  beside,  it  showcth  the  certainty  of  the  descending 
"  of  the  said  younger  brothers  out  of  both  the  houses,  and  giveth  knowledge  of 
"  the  time  thereof."  It  is  true,  this  way  may  show  the  time  of  the  descent,  but 
cannot  show  the  seniority  of  many  younger  brothers,  without  the  assistance  of  the 
minute  differences. 

The  Right  Honourable  the  Lord  Balmerino  is  known  by  his  difference  to  be 
descended  of  a  younger  son  of  Robert  Lord  Elphinstone  and  his  lady,  Sarah  Mon- 
teith,  daughter  to  Sir  John  Monteith  of  Kerse,  because  he  charges  his  cheveron 
with  buckles,  which  was  a  part  of  his  mother's  bearing.  His  lordship's  bearing- 
is  argjent,  oa  a  cheveron  sable,  betwixt  three  boars'  heads  gules,  as  many  buckles 
or. 

Arbuthnot  of  Fiddes,  descended  of  a  younger  son  of  Arbuthnot  of  that  Ilk, 
and  his  lady,  Margaret  Fraser,  carries  the  arms  of  the  Viscount  of  Ai-buthnot, 
viz.  azure,  a  crescent  betwixt  three  stars  argent,  within  an  orle  of  frases  of  the 
last.  Arbuthnot  of  Catherlan,  descended  of  a  third  son,  procreate  betwixt  Sir 
Robert  Arbuthnot  of  that  Ilk,  and  Dame  Margaret  Fraser,  daughter  to  the  Lord 
Lovat,  carries  Arbuthnot  within  a  bordure  argent,  charged  with  eight  frases,  or 
cinquefoils,  azure. 

NicoL  Sutherl.\nd  of  Torboll,  thereafter  of  Duffus,  a  second  son  of  Kenneth 
Earl  of  Sutherland,  that  was  killed  at  the  battle  of  Halidon-hill,  rtw;o  i  :533,  and 
his  lady,  a  daughter  of  Donald  Earl  of  Marr,  married  Cheyne,  heiress  of  Duffus, 
with  whom  he  got  the  barony  of  Duffus.  His  lady's  bearing  was  gules,  three  cross 
croslets  fitched  or.  He  added  them  to  his  paternal  coat,  viz.  gules,  three  stars  or. 
Thereafter  this  family  matched  with  another  heiress  of  the  name  of  Chisholm, 
who  carried  azure,  three  boars'  heads  erased  or.  With  these  figures  they  com- 
pose the  coat  as  now  borne  by  the  present  Lord  Duffus,  viz.  gules,  a  boar's  head 
erased,  betwixt  three  stars,  2  and  i,  and  as  many  cross  croslets,  i  and  2,  or. 

Mr  George  Keith  of  Arthurhouse,  sometime  Depute  of  the  Sheriffdom  of  Kin- 
cardine, descended  of  the  Earl  Marischal,  gives  a  composed  coat  thus,  argent,  a 
saltier  and  chief  gules,  for  Bruce,  the  last  charged  with  three  pallets  or,  for  Keith, 
all  within  a  bordure  gobonated  azure,  and  of  the  first. 

Thus  I  have  treated  of  the  ancient  and  modern  marks  of  cadency,  as  fully  as 
any  hitherto,  and  of  other  additional  differencing  figures,  taken  to  perpetuate  some 
honourable  action,  event,  employment,  and  alliances  with  other  families:  Which 
additional  figures  being  joined  with  the  principal  figures  of  the  chief  families  in 
one  shield,  encumbered  them,  and  made  a  confused  order  in  their  description,  not 
suitable  to  the  regular  disposition  and  situation  of  figures,  according  to  the  rules  of 
blazon,  which  gave  occasion  to  separate   and  marshal  them  into  distinct  quarters. 


20  OF  ADDITIONAL  nCURES,  ^c. 

by  the  principal  partition  lines.     And  this  is  the  eight  way  proposed  to  difterencc 
descendants  trom  the  principal  house,  and  one  from  another. 

There  are  ten  or  twelve  principal  causes  which  have  given  ground  for  multi- 
plying of  coats  of  arms,  and  rightly  marshalling  them  into  distinct  quarters  in  one 
shield :  On  which  I  am  not  to  insist  here,  but  in  the  following  chapter.  I  shall 
mention  here  one  of  the  principal  causes  of  quartering  coats,  which  is  the  necessity 
that  younger  brothers  or  sons  lie  under  to  distinguish  themselves  from  the  princi- 
pal houses  they  are  descended  of. 

By  my  proposed  order  1  begin  with  the  partition  line  called  parted  per  pale, 
the  French  only  parti.  The  husband  ordinarily  impales  his  own  coat  on  the  dex- 
ter with  that  of  his  wife's  on  the  sinister,  which  the  English  call  baron  zndfemme. 
If  the  husband  be  a  younger  brother,  he  ought  to  curry  his  brotherly  difference, 
notwithstanding  he  impales  with  his  wife.  If  the  wife  be  a  younger  sister, 
she  needs  no  dilference,  but  may  carry  her  father's  coat  as  he  did  :  For  all  nations 
agree  that  sisters  should  carry  no  marks  of  difference,  though  they  have  brothers^ 
and  when  they  have  no  brothers,-  and  be  heirs-portioners :  yea,  although  the 
estates,  dominion,  and  dignity  come  to  the  eldest  sister.  For  which  I  shall  here 
add  the  opinion  of  several  lawyers,  given  us  by  John  Baptista  Chnstyn,  Chancellor 
of  Brabant,  in  his  Jurispriidentia  Heroica,  Art.  5.  paragraph  in.  "  An  etiam  filije 
"  &•  sorores  insignia  paterna  rumpere  debeant,  ad  hoc,  ut  a  fratribus  distinguantur, 
"  &  certum  est  quod  non,  cum  vere  sunt  familiae  suk  finis,  &.  nubendo  transeant 
"  in  aliam  familiam :"  For  which  he  cites  several  authors,  and  adds,  "  Licet  feu- 
"  dum  &-  dominium  prEEcipuum  ad  majorem  duntaxat  pertineat,"  they  may  all  of 
them  carry  their  father's  arms  entire;  and  if  he  be  a  second  son,  or  any  other 
descendant,  having  his  arms  with  a  mark  of  cadency,  they  must  continue  the  same 
bruised'  aiTns;  as  our  author,  "  Si  earum  pater  anna  sua  ruperit,  veluti  secundo 
"  genitus,  tunc  etiam  filise  eandem  rupturam  patris  agnoscent,  &  in  insignibus 
"  propriis  retinebunt." 

The  reason  which  Guillim  in  his  Display  gives,  that  sisters  should  carry  no 
marks  of  differences,  that  when  married  they  lose  their  surname,  and  receive  that 
of  their  husbands.  But  that  is  no  reason  at  all ;  for  I  have  shown  by  learned 
authorities,  and  regular  practices,  that,  in  some  cases,  they  may  use  their  father's, 
arms ;  and  of  which  more  particularly  in  the  following  chapters.  Nor  does  this 
reason  of  his  prove  that  daughters,  before  their  marriage,  should  not  bear  their 
paternal  coat  with  differences;  seeing,  till  then,  they  lose  not  their  own  surname. 
But  the  learned  Sir  George  Mackenzie  gives  a  better  reason  for  this  rule,  "  That 
"  albeit  among  sons  the  eldest  exclude  all  the  younger  from  the  succession,  and 
"  therefore  differences  are  given  for  clearing  the  right  of  succession  amongst 
"  brothers  and  their  descendants  ;  yet  sisters  succeed  equally,  and  are  heirs-por- 
"  tioners;  and  so  there  is  no  use  of  differences  amongst  them,  seeing  seniority  in- 
•*  fers  no  privilege." 

Churchmen,  who  are  obliged  to  impale  their  paternal  coat  with  that  of  their 
ofSce,  place  their  coat  of  office  in  the  dexter,  parti,  with  their  paternal  on  the 
sinister;  which  is  not  to  be  bruised  with  any  mark  of  cadency,  although  descend- 
ed of  a  cadet,  because  anciently  they  were  not  supposed  to  have  succession.  But 
since  the  Reformation  the  practice  is  otherwise,  not  only  with  us,  but  in  other 
protestant  countries.  The  ecclesiastics  are  obliged  to  carry  the  coat  of  their  fa- 
milies with  suitable  marks  of  differences,  whether  they  impale  or  not  impale  with 
a  coat  of  office:  because  they  may  have  lawful  issue  to  transmit  their  arms  ta 
their  descendants,  that  they  may  be  distinguished  from  the  chief  house,  and  other 
collaterals. 

As  to  the  eight  way  proposed  of  differencing,  by  quartering  of  two  coats  in  one 
shield,  it  is  done  by  dividing  the  shield  into  four  parts,  by  a  parti  and  coupe  hne, 
placing  the  one  coat  in  the  first  and  fourth  area,  or  quarter,  and  the  other  in  the 
second  or  third  area  or  quarter.  It  is  questioned  by  some,  whether  it  be  a  sufficient 
difference.  These  who  will  not  have  it  one,  argue,  that  the  paternal  coat  is  not 
bruised,  and  twice  repeated,  as  entire  as  that  of  the  eldest  brother :  Besides,  the 
heads  of  principal  families  quarter  and  marshal  other  coats  with  their  own,  so  that 
a  second  brother  cannot  be  distinguished  from  the  eldest.  It  is  true  they  do  so 
v\pon  several  other  accounts,  as  to  show  their  dignified  feus,  &.c.  of  which  after- 


OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  l^c.  21 

wards ;  yet  by  the  practice  of  all  nations  younger  brothers  difference  themselves 
from  their  elder  brother,  by  quartering  with  their  paternal  arms  those  of  others, 
such  as  their  mother's,  without  diminution  or  addition  to  the  arms  of  their  fiuher, 
but  must  still  continue  their  father's  brisure,  if  he  be  a  cadet  of  a  principal  family. 
Of  this  opinion  is  the  above-mentioned  author,  whose  words  I  here  subjoin,  being 
an  answer  to  the  above  question :  "  Abunde  satisfit  dum  primogenitus  plana  portat 
"  avita  insignia,  alter  vero  iUorum  maternis  cumulata  in  distinctionis  notam:" 
And  afterwards,  "  Et  ita  mores  passim  observant,  ut  ilia  scuti  quadripartitio,  se- 
"  cundo  genito  videatur  esse  peculiaris:"  And  gives  for  examples,  "  Sic  Rymmer- 
"  swallii  insignia  cum  Gauriis,  a  secundo  genito  cumulata  vidimus:  Sic  Mont- 
"  morenciaca  cum  Egmondanis  &  Bossuviis:  Sic  Henninia  cum  Burgundicis,  & 
"  plura  alia  quorum  enumeratio  ta;dium  pariat." 

The  same  is  practised  with  us;  for  a  younger  son  or  brother,  by  way  of  quar- 
tering another  coat  with  his  paternal,  is  looked  upon  as  a  sufficient  and  regidar 
brisure,  in  the  best  of  our  families,  and  especially  by  second  sons;  which  way 
seems  to  be  peculiar  to  them,  not  only  by  quartering  the  arms  of  their  mothers, 
but  other  arms,  upon  account  of  honourable  actions,  offices,  titles,  alliances,  Stc. 
Of  which  practice,  many  examples  might  be  given,  but  I  shall  here  only  add  a 
few. 

Sir  George  Mackenzie  says,  in  his  Science  of  Heraldry,  chap.  21.  "  These  ca- 
"  dets,  who  have  their  arms  quartered  with  other  arms,  need  no  difference,  (sup- 
"  posing  them  to  be  immediate  sons  of  principal  families,  as  I  imderstand)  for  the 
"  quartering  or  impaling  is  a  sufficient  difference;  and  therefore  it  was  unne- 
"  cessary  for  the  Earl  of  Kelly  to  have  borne  a  crescent  for  a  mark  of  difference, 
"  as  second  son  of  the  Earl  of  Marr,  seeing  he  bears,  quarterly,  with  the  arms  of 
"  Erskine,  first  and  fourth  an  imperial  crown  within  a  double  tressure  or:  bestow - 
"  ed  upon  him  for  his  assistance  given  to  King  James,  in  Cowrie's  Conspiracy." 

The  Right  Honourable  the  Earl  of  Northesk,  whose  predecessor  was  a  second 
brother  to  David  Carnegie  Earl  of  Southesk,  was  first  created  Earl  of  Ethie,  who 
then  carried,  or,  an  eagle  displayed  azure,  within  a  bordure  gules,  for  his  differ- 
ence :  But  thereafter  changing  the  title  of  Ethie  for  Northesli,  quartered  the  pa- 
ternal coat  of  Carnegie  (witlxout  the  bordure)  with  argent,  a  pale  gules,  for 
Northesk. 

The  Right  Honourable  the  Viscount  of  Stormont,  quarters  the  principal  coat 
of  Murray,  as  descended  of  TuUibardin,  with  the  arms  of  Barclay,  for  his  differ- 
ence, without  any  other  brisure. 

Hume  of  Wedderburn,  descended  of  a  second  son  of  Sir  Thomas  Home  of  that 
Ilk,  one  of  the  progenitors  of  the  Earls  of  Home,  and  his  lady,  Nicolas  Pepdic. 
heiress  of  Dunglass,  has  been  in  use,  since  the  reign  of  King  James  I.  to  carry  the 
principal  bearijig  of  the  family  of  Home,  viz.  quarterly,  first  vert,  a  lion  rampant 
argent,  armed  and  langued  gules,  for  Home;  second  argent,  three  papingoes  vert, 
beaked  and  membred ^tf/c".r,  for  Pepdie  of  Dunglass;  third  argent,  a  saltier  ingrail- 
ed  azure,  for  Sinclair  of  Polwarth,  added  for  his  difference  from  the  Earl  of  Home, 
and  the  fourth  quarter  as  the  first. 

Hume  Earl  of  Marchmont,  descended  from  a  second  son  of  Wedderburn,  car- 
ries as  Wedderburn;  but,  for  his  difference,  adds  another  quarter,  the  arms  of  Pol- 
warth, being  argent,  three  piles  ingrailed  gules. 

Hepburn  of  Humbie,  descended  from  a  second  son  of  Hepburn  of  Waughton, 
carries  the  principal  coat  of  Hepburn,  viz.  gules,  on  a  cheveron  argent,  a  rose  be- 
twixt two  lions  rampant  of  the  first ;  and,  for  his  difference,  quarters  them  with 
argent,  three  laurel  leaves  vert,  for  marrying  with  a  daughter  of  Foulis  of  Coi- 
lington. 

Ker  of  Littledean,  descended  of  a  second  brother  of  Cessford,  quarterly,  first 
and  fourth  vert,  on  a  cheveron  argent,  three  sttLXS gules;  and  in  base,  an  unicorn's 
head  erased  of  the  second,  for  Ker;  second  and  third  azure,  three  crosses  moline 
argent,  for  Ainslie,  which  differences  him  from  others  of  the  name  of  Ker. 

I  shall  not  trouble  my  reader  with  more  examples  of  this  kind  :  But  it  is  to  be 
still  observed,  that  a  second  brother,  though  he  differences  himself  by  quartering 
another  coat  with  his  paternal,  yet  he  must  always  continue  his  father's  brisure,  he 
being  a  younger  son  of  a  principal  family :  For,  how  shall  we  otherwise  distinguish 

Vol.  II.  E 


aa  OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  'dSc . 

principal  families  from  those  descended  of  them,  if  the  cadets  do  not  continue  that 
mark  of  the  families  from  whom  they  are  descended  ?  For,  if  cadets  should  be 
allowed  to  lay  aside  their  father's  or  grandfather's  brisures,  in  their  paternal  bear- 
ings, when  they  quarter  them  with  the  coats  of  other  families,  by  the  same  allow- 
ance, they  will  leave  out  the  marks  of  cadency  of  these  coats  with  whom  they 
quarter,  and  then  we  shall  not  know  the  particular  families  they  are  descended 
from,  nor  with  what  family  they  are  allied.  If  a  Douglas  should  quarter  with 
another  family  of  the  name  of  Douglas,  and  Stewart  with  a  Stewart,  the  differ- 
ences of  these  families  being  laid  aside,  we  shall  not  know  what  Douglases  or 
Stewarts  they  are  come  from.  Our  ancient  practice  was  not  so,  but  of  late 
practised  by  some.  The  clearest  way  then  to  make  known  the  descents  of  fa- 
milies by  arms,  is  for  them  to  retain  the  congruent  differences  of  their  progenitors, 
although  they  quarter  with  the  coats  of  other  families  as  their  own  particular 
difference. 

Th.-  ninth  way  of  differencing,  as  proposed,  is  by  transposition  of  the  quarters, 
by  making  the  first,  second,  and  third,  first,  and  by  adding  different  crests ;  which 
practice  is  not  frequently  used  but  in  Germany,  as  Menestrier  observes,  page  389, 
That  several  branches  of  great  families  distinguish  themselves  only  by  different 
crests,  without  inserting  any  addition  in  the  arms  themselves,  where  there  will 
be  many  crests  timbering  one  shield :  of  which  more  particularly  in  the  chapter  of 
Crests. 

The  above  differences  I  have  been  treating  of,  they  make  use  of  sometimes,  but 
not  so  frequently  and  regularly  as  the  Britons,  French,  Spaniards,  Flandrians,  and 
other  nations;  for  with  the  Germans,  all  the  younger  brothers  do  succeed  equally 
to  the  titles  of  dignity  and  honour  of  the  families  from  which  they  are  descended, 
which  is  not  ordinary  in  other  nations ;  besides  their  differencing  by  crests,  of 
which  they  have  many  and  various  on  their  shields.  The  autlior  of  Jurisprudentia 
Heroica,  Art.  2.  speaking  of  the  Germans,  says,  That  it  is  necessary  for  brothers  to 
distinguish  themselves  from  one  another,  which  they  sometimes  do,  by  different 
crests;  his  words  are,  "  Etiam  inter  fratres  armorum  distinctio  necessaria  est:  In- 
•'  terdum  arma  solo  cimerio  discrepant;"  and  instances  the  families  descended 
from  the  House  of  Burgundy,  who  carry  all  one  arms,  but  difference  by  crests; 
some  have  flower-de-luces,  others  owls,  and  some  trees.  They  do  also  difference 
themselves  oi-dinarily  by  addition  or  diminution  of  quarters,  of  which  they  use 
many  in  one  shield. 

The  Electoral  Dukes  of  Saxony  have  twenty-one  quarters  in  one  shield,  which 
they  timber  with  eight  helmets,  and  as  many  crests.  The  other  branches  of  that 
family  not  only  distinguish  themselves  by  different  crests,  and  disuse  the  Electoral 
ensign,  but  add  or  diminish  the  number  of  their  quarters  for  difference;  as  Jacob 
Imhoff,  in  Notitia,  S.  Rom.  Germanici  Imperii  Genealogica,  lib.  2.  cap.  7.  "  Caete- 
"  rum  Sasoniae  ducum,  quorum  hoc  capite  mentio  facta  est,  clypei  in  eo  tantum, 
"  ab  illo  quem  modo  deumbravimus,  differunt,  quod  Electorali  symbolo  carent, 
"  aliudque  ferunt."  The  above-mentioned  author  of  "jurisprudentia  tells  us,  Art.  5. 
paragraph  15.  "  In  Germania  omnes  eadem  cum  pnmogenito  insignia  portant, 
"  nisi  quo  tres  principes  Electores  Saeculares,  ad  differentiam  illorum,  qui  cum  illis 
"  ejusdem  gentis  &-  originis  sunt,  ea  qua  imperatori  in  ordine  processionis  prae- 
"  ferunt  insignia,  clypeis  electoralibus  insculpta  habeant."  It  is  to  be  observed, 
that  the  badges  which  the  Secular  Electors  use  in  each  of  their  arms,  are  marks  of 
their  offices,  and  not  there  placed  for  differences. 

The  Elector  Palatine  gives  for  his  achievement  three  shields  Ue%,  i.  e.  tied 
together;  the  first  sable,  a  lion  rampant  or,  for  the  Palatine;  second,  lozenge, 
argent  and  azure,  for  Bavaria;  the  third  shield  betwixt  these  two  is  only  gules, 
for  the  electoral  office.  The  families  branched  from  the  Elector  Palatine's  carry 
the  same  arms  marshalled  with  more  coats,  but  never  use  the  electoral  ensign, 
that  being  forbid  them.  The  Palatine  of  Rangrave  carries,  quarterly,  first  and 
fourth  iht:  lion  of  Palatine;  second  and  third  the  lozenges,  for  Bavaria;  and,  for 
■  difference,  adds  the  arms  of  Degenfield  by  way  of  surtout.  The  Counts  Palatine 
of  the  Neuburg  line,  add  more  quarters,  viz.  coupe  one,  parti  three,  which  make 
eight  quarters,  and  the  arms  of  Palatine  in  surtout  makes  the  ninth  quarter.  The 
Spanheiman  line  carries,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  Palatine,  second  Bavaria;  third. 


OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  i^c:  2^ 

dieque,  argent  and  gules,  for  Spanheim:  But  the  Bipontin  branch,  which  is  next 
to  the  Count  Palatine  Neuburg,  carries  the  same  nine  quarters  of  Palatine  Neu- 
burg;  but,  for  ditrerence,  otherwise  disposes  or  transposes  the  quarters  thus,  coupe 
in  chief.  Palatine  and  Bavaria  quarterly,  and  in  surtout  Valencia,  which  are  three 
coats;  and  in  base,  coupe  one,  parti  two,  which  make  six  quarters,  and  so  nine  of 
the  whole.  Which  differencing  way  by  transposition  of  the  quarters  is  very  singu- 
lar with  the  Germans,  as  Imhoff  takes  notice:  But  with  the  French  and  English  I 
have  met  with  no  such  practice  allowed  by  our  heralds.  For,  if  transposing  of 
quarters  be  received  for  a  way  of  differencing  cadets,  it  would  not  only  prejudge 
principal  faraihes,  and  frustrate  the  end  and  design  of  marks  of  cadency,  wheieby 
we  may  know  the  degrees  of  consanguinity,  but  likewise  destroys  heraldry,  by 
rendering  all  its  witty  contrivances  useless:  For  the  transposition  of  four  or  six 
quarters  may  be  so  many  ways,  that  we  shall  never  know  the  principal  stem,  whereot 
they  are  come,  nor  primogeniture  amongst  themselves,  nor  degrees  of  consangui- 
nity by  their  bearings.  And  likewise,  the  transposing  arms  which  are  marshalled 
in  one  shield  is  dangerous;  for  thereby  the  arms,  which  in  one  bearing  have  pre- 
cedency, lose  it  in  another;  so  that  we  cannot  know  the  precedency  due  to  arms, 
of  which  in  the  following  chapter.  And  I  shall  conclude  this  with  a  short  ac- 
count of  the  practice  of  differences  in  Italy,  which  the  eminentest  families  most 
religiously  observe,  as  the  author  of  Jurisprudentia  Heroica,  that  they  difference  by 
the  lambel,  bordure,  batton,  and  quartering  other  coats  with  the  paternal,  as  by 
the  examples  he  gives  us,  whose  words  follow:  "  Ab  aliquibus  illustribus  in  Italia 
"  familiis,  mos  ille  ultra  religiose  fuerit  observatus.  Ipsa  Neapolitani  regni  in- 
"  signia,  tigillum  coccineum  praeferunt,  ut  &  ipsi  Sicilia;  reges,"  i.  e.  azure,  seme 
of  fiower-de-luces  or,  a  lambel  of  five  points  gules,  being  the  arms  of  their  princes, 
who  were  the  younger  sons  of  France.  So  Peter  Medici  carries  the  arms  of 
Medici,  quartered  with  these  of  Toletani,  to  difference  from  his  elder  brother  the 
Duke  of  Etruria:  "  Sic  Petrus  Mediceus  insignia  quadripartita  ex  Mediceis  & 
"  Toletanis  armis  gessit,  in  discrimen  fratris  natu  majoris,  magnae  Etrurias  Ducis. 
"  Peirus  Antoninus  Sanctevernus,  Sancti  Marci  Dux,  limbum  gestavit  cyaneum," 
i.  e.  a  bordure  azure  round  the  principal  bearing  of  the  family,  being  argent,  a 
fesse  gules.  "  Tiberius  Caraffa  familia;  suae  insignia  plana  &  Integra  gessit,  ejus 
"  frater  Fabricius  Roccellfe  princeps,  baculo  ilia  prasino  &  spinoso  a  fraternis 
"  discrevit,  unde  prosapia  ilia  nomen  de  la  Spina  attraxit,"  i.  e.  Fabricius  Prince 
of  Rocceili  distinguished  his  arms  from  the  plain  ones  used  by  his  elder  brother 
by  adding  a  bend  green  bordered  with  thorns,  so  that  his  family  is  named  Spinosa, 
or  de  la  Spina.  Sylvester  Petra  Sancta  the  Italian,  in  his  Tessera  Gentilitice,  cap.  67J 
De guttatis  tigiUis  tesserarii,  i.  e.  lambels;  cap.  68.  de  clabula,  i.  e.  batton;  and 
cap.  G<^.  de  limbo,  the  bordure:  Of  all  which  he  treats,  and  illustrates  by  examples 
in  all  their  varieties,  in  tinctures  and  forms  of  figures,  of  differences,  or  additional 
figures,  to  difference  descendants,  to  whom  I  refer  the  curious. 

In  the  Dukedom  of  Milan  it  is  somewhat  odd  that  younger  brothers  use  no 
differences,  but  carry  the  entire  arms  with  their  elder  brothers,  as  by  a  declaratioa 
of  the  senate,  23d  of  May  1663,  which  is  fully  set  down  in  Jurisprudentia  Heroica. 
And  the  same  practice  is  in  the  country  of  Piedmont,  where  all  brothers  carry  the 
same  arms  with  their  elder,  except  they  be  counts;  and  then  they  place  above 
their  arms  a  comital  bonnet,  or  crown,  which  the  younger  brothers  are  discharged 
to  use  on  their  arms. 

So  much  then  for  the  general  practice  in  Europe,  for  differencing  lawful  younger 
ons  or  brothers  from  principal  families,  and  from  one  another. 

But  before  I  proceed  to  treat  of  marshalling,  or  quartering  many  coats  of  arms 
in  one  shield,  upon  several  accounts  and  occasions  in  the  following  chapters,  I  shall 
end  this  with  the  marks  used  by  the  most  polite  nations,  in  distinguishing  unlaw- 
ful issue,  or  bastards,  from  the  lawful. 


OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  isfc 


MARKS  OF  BASTARDY, 


Carried  by  such  as  are  not  born  in  lawful  marriage;  who  are  divided  by  law- 
yers, in  naturales,  spurios,  W  ex  dtimnatis  comphxibus  procreatos\  but  by  our  style 
all  of  those  go  now  under  the  general  name  oi  bastards. 

With  the  most  polite  nations  in  Europe  arms  have  been  looked  upon  as  sacred 
signs  of  families,  and  could  not  descend  but  to  the  lawful  issue;  so  that  bastards, 
as  some  say,  cannot  carry  the  name  in  arms  of  their  supposed  fathers,  not  being  of 
the  family  or  kindred  :  Nam  de  jure  patrem  demonstrare  neqveunt.  Therefore,  see- 
mg  the  common  law  determines  not  who  is  their  father,  it  were  absurd  that  the 
laws  of  heraldry  should  allow  them  to  bear  any  man's  arms  as  their  paternal  coat : 
As  Bartolus,  "  Non  enira  sunt  de  familia  sive  agnitione,  &-  hoc  jure  communi 
"  verum  est."  And  the  same  is  said  by  Hopingius,  "  De  insignium  prisco  &- 
"  novo  jure,  cap.  7.  Cum  haec  scilicet  arma  sunt  prsecipuum  agnitionis  &-  fa- 
"  mili^e  indicium."  And  it  was  also  a  received  rule  amongst  heralds,  that  bastards 
should  not  bear  the  paternal  coat,  nor  name  of  their  supposed  fathers,  and  this  was 
strictly  observed  of  old. 

We  do  not  find  the  natural  sons  of  princes  and  great  men  to  have  carried  the 
name  and  arms  of  iheir  fathers,  of  old,  in  Britain:  A  few  instances  1  sliall  here  re- 
peat. William  Peverll,  natural  son  of  William  the  Conquerer,  carried  nothing 
of  his  father's  arms  (1  mean  these  of  Normandy)  however  so  highly  dignified; 
neither  did  Robert,  natural  son  of  Henry  I.  of  England,  but  other  arms,  viz.  or, 
three  chevronels  ^;//fj-;  and  the  same  was  carried  by  his  lawful  son  Williaj.i  Earl 
of  Gloucester.  William  Long-espee,  natural  son  of  Henry  II.  begot  on  the  fair 
Rosamond,  who  was  made  Earl  of  Salisbury  by  King  Richard  I.  anno  1196,  car- 
ried for  his  armorial  figure  a  long  sword,  as  relative  to  his  name;  and  his  son, 
another  William  Long-espee,  took  the  arms  of  his  mother  Ela,  the  daughter  and 
heir  of  William  Fitzpatrick  Earl  of  Salisbury,  viz.  a%ure,  six  lions  argent,  3,  2  and 
I,  as  Sandford  in  his  Genealogical  History.  Where  he  also  tells  us,  that  Sir  John 
Clermont,  natural  son  of  Thomas  Duke  of  Clarence,  (who  gave  France  quartered 
with  England,  with  a  label  ermine  charged  with  cantons  ^w/^-j-)  carried  parted  per 
cheveron,  gules  and  azure,  in  chief  two  lions  rampant  gardant,  and  affronte  or. 
By  which  bearing  it  seems  he  was  the  first  natural  son,  at  least  I  observe,  in 
England,  who  began  to  carry  arms  resembling  those  of  his  father ;  the  lions  being 
little  different  from  those  of  England.  -His  father,  the  duke,  was  a  second  son  of 
Henry  IV. 

The  natural  sons  of  our  kings  anciently  had  neither  name  nor  arms  of  their  fa- 
thers, but  such  as  were  altogether  different ;  and  these  they  obtained  upon  several 
accounts.  As,  by  marriage,  Robert,  natural  son  of  King  William  the  Lion, 
having  married  the  heiress  of  Lundie  of  that  Ilk,  he  and  his  issue  took  upon  them 
the  name  and  arms  of  that  family,  and  which  they  continued  to  carry,  till  of  late 
they  took  the  arms  of  Scotland  within  a  bordure  gobonated,  argent  and  azure,  as 
the  natural  sons  of  our  kings,  who  have  been  in  use  to  take  such  bordures^  since 
the  reign  of  King  James  II.  of  Scotland:  But  what  other  marks  of  illegitimation 
they  had  before,  1  cannot  learn.  How  soon  the  bastards  of  our  nobility  and  gentry 
were  allowed  to  carry  the  arms  of  their  supposed  fathers  I  cannot  be  positive;  but, 
of  old,  in  France,  Spain,  Italy,  and  Flanders,  bustards  were  allowed  to  carry  their 
alleged  fathers'  arms  with  some  singular  mark,  invented  to  distinguish  them  and 
their  issue  from  the  lawful  children  and  their  descendants.  I  shall  here  add  an 
article  relating  to  bastards,  from  the  edict  or  law  of  the  Archduke  Albert,  and 
Isabel,  concerning  the  ensigns  of  the  nobility  of  the  Belgians,  proclaimed  the  14th 
of  December  161 6,  as  in  Prudentia  Heroica. 

"  To  repress  the  abuses  which  have  fallen  out  with  respect  to  bastards,  and  their 
"  descendants,  v/ho  have  presumed  to  can-y  the  surname  of  the  lawful  family,  as 
"  also  the  arms  of  the  same,  without  placing  therein  any  mark  of  bastardy;  so 
"  that  in  process  of  time,  the  descendants  of  some  natural  or  unlawful  sons,  come 
"  often  to  put  themselves  in  rank  with  the  lawful,  and  pretend  to  their  successions, 
"  rights  and  prerogatives,  on  account,  that  neither  by  the  name,  nor  by  the  arms, 
"  there  can  be  known  any  difference  or  distinction,  betwixt  the  lawfid  children 


OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  ^c.  25 

"  and  the  descendants  of  bastards:  We  will,  and  expressly  command,  that  to  the 
"  arms  of  bastards  and  unlawful  children,  (unless  they  be  legituuaLe  by  letters 
"  from  us  or  our  predecessors)  and  their  descendants,  shall  be  adJed  a  ditlerence, 
"  and  notable  special  mark,  to  wit,  to  the  arms  of  the  said  bastardi  or  unlawful 
"  children,  a  bar,  and  to  that  of  their  descendants,  a  remarkable  note  from  these 
"  used  by  the  younger  descendants  of  lawful  children,  under  the  pain,"  Cxc. 

The  bar  above  mentioned,  called  by  us  the  bastard  bar,  is  well  known  througli 
all  Europe  as  a  mark  of  illegitmiation.  It  is  a  traverse,  which  comes  from  the 
upper  left  corner  of  the  shield,  passing  to  the  right  corner  in  the  lowest  part ;  it 
surmounts,  or  comes  over  the  essential  or  principal  figures,  and  is  called  by  the 
Germans  barra,  and  with  them  it  is  somewhat  broad,  near  almost  as  the  bend- 
sinister.  If  it  be  narrow,  it  is  called  by  the  Latin  writers  Jilum,  a  hne  or  thread : 
"  Filum  vero  in  eo  tantum  differt  a  barra,  quod  sit  linea  quarta  parte  ea  an- 
"  gustior."  But  with  us  and  the  English,  the  bastard  bar,  or  batton,  is  the  fourth 
part  of  the  bend-sinister,  as  GuiUim  and  other  English  writers  describe  it,  and  now 
carried  coupe;  that  is,  cut  short,  and  does  not  touch  the  extremities  of  the  shield, 
called  by  the  English,  batton-sinister  couped,  and  by  the  French,  baton  peri,  be- 
ing very  small  and  short  with  them.  It  is  said  by  some  to  represent  a  cudgel;  and 
is  given  to  bastards,  to  show  that  they  were  not  freemen,  but  liable,  as  slaves  of 
old  were,  and  servants  yet  are,  to  be  beat  and  cudgelled.  This  mark  of  lUegiti- 
mation  is  so  well  known,  and  generally  practised  by  all  nations,  that  1  need  not 
add  examples  here  of  domestic  and  foreign  bearings.  But  to  proceed  to  other 
marks  of  illegitimation  in  certain  countries. 

In  Brabant,  Flanders,  and  some  other  dominions  in  Germany,  the  bastard  (if  he 
has  not  the  bar)  is  obliged  to  carry  his  father's  arms  in  a  canton  dexter  or  sinister, 
and  all  the  other  part  of  the  shield  is  blank.  As  the  author  of  yurispriidentia  He 
roica,  "  Illegitimorum  indicium,  si  quis  in  ea  parte  scuti,  quam  heraldi  canton 
"  vocant,  paternum  gestet  insigne,  rehqua  scuti  parte  vacua  rehcta;"  of  which 
practice  he  gives  us  several  examples,  as  a  remarkable  note  of  illegitimation :  But 
I  have  not  met  Vtith  such  a  practice  in  Britain. 

Some  write,  that  when  the  helmet  and  crest,  which  timbers  the  shield  of  arms, 
are  turned  looking  to  the  left,  it  is  a  sign  of  bastardy.  But  this  does  not  hold  by 
a  general  practice ;  for  when  achievements  of  arms  are  hung  up  in  churches  at 
the  sides  of  the  altar,  the  helmet  and  crest  look  to  the  altar ;  so  that  some  look  to 
the  right,  and  some  to  the  left.  And  the  same  custom  is  used  where  the  sove- 
reign's arms  are,  as  our  above-mentioned  author,  whose  words  are,  "  Hoc  vero  non 
"  ita  obtinet  in  Bslgio,  infinitis  ubique  exemplis  posset  verificari,  £t  in  omnibus 
"  templis  ubi  capitula  seu  commitia  aurei  velleris  celebrata  fuerunt,  videntur 
"  galeas  equitum  ab  una  parte  versus  levam  ab  alia  versus  dextram  versa,  sic  ut 
"  omnes  aram  sacram  aspiciunt."  And  it  does  not  hold  in  Germany,  where  they 
have  many  helmets  and  crests  upon  one  shield ;  these  on  the  right  and  left  look 
to  one  placed  affrrmte  in  the  middle  betwixt  them. 

The  bordure  gobonated,  or  compone,  is  now  a  mark  of  bastardy  in  Britain,  by  our 
late  practices,  which  I  have  already  spoken  to  in  this  chapter.  These  then,  being 
the  ordinary  marks  of  illegitimation  which  I  have  met  with  us,  to  distinguish  un- 
lawful children  from  the  lawful  ones. 

When  there  are  many  bastards  in  one  family,  they  are  obliged  to  carry  these 
marks,  and  to  difterence  themselvtfS  from  one  another,  having  them  of  difl'erent 
tinctures,  as  the  five  natural  sons  of  King  Charles  11.  James  Duke  of  Monmouth 
had  over  the  arms  of  Great  Britain  a  batton-sinister  or.  Henry  Fitzrov  Duke  of 
Grafton  carried  the  same,  with  his  batton-sinister  compone,  azure  and  argent. 
Charles  Fitzroy  his  batton  was  all  ermine.  George  Fitzroy  Duke  of  Northum- 
berland, his  batton-sinister  was  compone,  a'zure  and  ermine.  And  George  Beau- 
clerk  Duke  of  St  Albans  had  his  batton-sinister  gjdes.  All  which  were  placed 
over  the  arms  of  Great  Britain. 

What  were  the  marks  that  were  added  to  the  arms  of  the  bastard  and  his  lawful 
descendants,  the  batton  being  dispensed  with,  is  difficult  to  give  a  satisfactory  ac- 
count. By  the  edict  above  mentioned,  where  the  lawful  descendants  of  a  bastard 
were  to  have  remarkable  notes,  different  from  these  used  by  the  descendants  of 
lawful  progenitors,  it  could  not  be  by  quartering  their  arms  with  their  maternal, 

Vol.  XL  G 


z6  OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  iJc. 

which  is  a  fit  difference  for  the  descendants  of  lawful  children,  except  the  bastard 
bar  was  placed  on  the  paternal  arms:  But  the  bar  and  bordure  gobonated  being  dis- 
pensed with,  what  could  these  other  marks  be? 

John  Baptista  Christyn,  author  of  Jurisprudentia  Heroica,  gives  us  from  Scohier 
five  sorts  of  differences  (besides  the  batton  for  difference)  used  by  bastards,  and 
their  lawful  descendants.  I.  La  pr/inte  de  I'ecu  coupee  de  metal  mi  coiileur,  i.  e.  the 
point  of  the  shield  coupe  of  metal  or  colour. 

II.  Le  chif  de  I'ecu  coupe  Si  d' autre  metal  on  couleur  que  les  armes,  i.  e.  the  chief 
of  the  shield  coupe,  and  of  other  metal  or  colour  than  the  arms. 

III.  La  poiitte  de  Vecu  trianglie  de  metal  on  de  couleur,  i.  e.  the  point  of  the  shield 
triartgled  of  metal  or  colour. 

IV.  Le  cheftaille  IS  tranche,  on  autrement  se  blasonne  escloppe  a  dextre  et  sinistre, 
ou  de  run  seul,  i.  e.  the  chief  taille  and  tranche,  or  otherwise  blazoned,  slopping  to 
the  right  or  left,  or  of  one  alone,  of  a  tranche  or  taiUe  line. 

V.  Uassiete  des  armes  sur  Vecu  en  forme  de  chevron,  i.  e.  the  situation  of  the 
arms,  or  the  shield,  in  form  of  a  cheveron. 

The  reason  which  is  given  by  lav^yers,  especially  by  Tiraquel,  de  Jure  prin. 
Quest.  12.  ver.  13.  is,  that  it  is  necessary  to  give  to  the  lawful  children  of  bastards 
different  marks,  to  distinguish  them  from  children  of  lawful  descent:  For  the  first 
mentioned  not  being  of  the  house  and  family,  nor  existing  as  successors  to  the 
grandfather,  there  can  be  no  lawful  consequence  from  an  unlawful  beginning  of 
birth,  and  corrupt  root,  with  those  of  lavv'ful  descent.  What  these  different  marks 
are,  I  cannot  learn,  nor  of  such  a  practice  in  Britain,  or  anywhere ;  but  that  the 
lawful  issue  of  bastards,  keeping  their  fathers'  or  grandfathers'  marks  of  illegi- 
timation,  distinguish  themselves  to  show  the  seniority  of  their  births  by  the  same 
marks  of  cadency  (of  which  I  have  been  speaking)  used  by  those  of  lawful 
descent. 

But  to  return  to  the  above  marks  of  illegitimation  given  by  Scohier,  which  I 
shall  explain  a  little,  though  their  practice  is  hardly  to  be  met  with  in  Britain. 
And  as  to  the  first  of  them,  that  is,  when  the  under  part  of  the  shield  is  blank, 
and  separate  by  a  coupe  line  from  the  arms  above.  And  as  to  the  second,  when 
the  upper  part  of  the  shield  is  blank,  and  the  arms  below.  Of  the  first,  our  cele- 
brated author  of  Prudentia  Heroica,  gives,  for  instance  of  such  practice,  the  arms  of 
Charles,  a  natural  son  of  the  Duke  of  Burgundy;  his  words  are,  Scuto  iiempe  in- 
tegro,  infernis  fracto;  and  tells  us,  that  this  way  of  differencing  is  yet  in  use  in 
Brabant,  and  there  strictly  observed,  not  only  by  bastards,  but  also  by  their  law- 
ful issue:  And  further  tells  us,  that  a  bastard  of  a  bastard  must  have  as  many 
marks  of  illegitimation  as  there  are  illegitimate  generations  descending  in  a  right 
line :  For  which  he  gives  us  the  seal  of  arms  of  Anthony  Baron  of  Wacken,  na- 
tural son  of  Anthony  Lord  Roche,  of  the  House  of  Burgundy,  called  for  his  valour 
Le  Grand  Bastard.  The  first  mentioned  Anthony  carried  the  arms  of  Burgundy, 
coupe  en  chef,  and  en  pointe,  that  is,  the  upper  part  of  the  shield  and  the  lower 
part  was  blank,  and  the  arms  of  Burgundy  were  placed  fesse-ways;  so  there  were 
two  marks  of  illegitimation  in  chief  and  base,  as  our  author  says.  Sic  duobus  ille- 
gitimis  discerniculis  notatum,  sive  bis  ruptum. 

The  bastards  of  the  House  of  Burgundy  differenced  themselves  variously,  as  the 
four  bastards  of  Duke  Philip  the  Good ;  the  first,  Anthony  Lord  of  Roche  carried 
the  arms  of  Burgundy  with  a  traverse  line,  or  bar-sinister.  The  second  carried 
the  arms  of  Burgundy  in  bend,  (as  our  author)  ilia  in  bahheo,  vulgo  en  bend. 
The  third  the  same,  in  fascia,  vulgo  en  face,  that  is,  in  fesse,  or  fesse-ways.  The 
fourth  bastard  had  the  same  arms  of  Burgundy,  in  cheveron,  or  cheveron-ways ; 
and  all  the  other  parts  of  the  shield  being  of  gold,  were  void  of  other  figures;  as 
our  author  says,  Scuti  partibus  aureis  iS  vacuis  vulgo  escloppe  relictis:  And  their  seals 
of  arms  are  also  given  us  by  Olivarus  Uredus  de  Sigillis  Comitum  Flandriie;  where 
it  is  also  to  be  observed,  that  the  lawful  descendants  of  those  bastards  carried  the 
arms  of  Burgundy  quartered  with  those  of  their  mothers,  or  with  these  of  their 
dominions  and  territories;  and  some  of  them  had  sinister,  and  some  dexter  traverse 
lines  over  the  quarters  of  Burgundy. 

These  ways  of  distinguishing  natural  sons  from  lawful  ones  I  cannot  say  I  have 
met  with  in  Britain,  except  that  one  used  by  Henry  Beaufort  Earl  of  Somerset, 


OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  b'f.  27 

and  Lord  Herbert,  lawful  son  of  Charles  Earl  of  Worcester,  and  Lord  Herbert, 
who  was  a  natural  son  of  Henry  Beaufort  Duke  of  Somerset:  which  Charles  car- 
ried the  arms  of  his  father  Duke  Henry,  being,  quarterly,  France  and  England, 
within  a  bordure  gobonated,  argent  and  azure,  and  bruised  them  beside  w  ith  a 
batton-sinister  fl^jTc.;;?^  as  a  mark  of  illegitimation  :  But  his  lavvfid  son,  the 'above 
mentioned  Earl  Henry,  laid  aside  the  batton-sinister,  used  by  his  father,  and  car- 
ried the  arms  of  Beaufort,  with  a  new  diilerence,  (one  of  them,  as  I  observe,  above- 
mentioned)  coupe  en  chef,  and  en  pointe,  i.  e.  the  arms  in  fesse,  or  fesse-ways:  And 
his  son  and  successor,  \Villiam  Earl  of  Worcester,  Lord  Herbert,  carried  as  his 
father,  which  were  so  placed  on  his  stall  at  Windsor,  being  a  Knight  of  the  Gar- 
ter, as  Sandford  tells  us  in  his  Genealogical  History  of  England.  He  was  succeed- 
ed by  his  son  Edward  Somerset  Earl  of  Worcester,  Lord  Herbert,  who  was  the 
first  of  the  line  of  Somerset  that  left  that  way  of  placing  the  arms  of  Beaufort  in 
fesse,  or  fesse-ways,  and  filled  the  whole  shield  with  the  arms  of  Beaufort,  viz. 
France  and  England,  quarterly,  within  a  bordure  gobonated,  argent  ^nd  azure ; 
and  ever  since  are  so  continued  by  the  family. 

It  is  without  controversy  that  there  were  laws  made  and  observed  through  all 
Europe  relative  to  nobility,  and  even  concerning  the  discernicula,  the  brisures  of 
lawful  children,  and  the  marks  and  distinctions  given  to  bastards.  John  le  Fevre 
Sti  Rcniige  Dynasta,  Chief  King  of  Arms  to  the  Duke  of  Burgundy,  in  the  year 
1463,  in  a  manuscript  of  his  in  French,  givv.n  us  by  the  author  oi  Jurispritdentia 
Heroica,  has  some  general  rules  relating  to  the  distinction  of  bastards  from  lawful 
children,  which  I  here  add. 

None  ought  to  carry  the  arms,  nor  the  sign  of  another,  to  the  prejudice  of  others 
to  whom  they  belong. 

None  can  sell  nor  alienate  the  arms  of  his  family  or  lineage. 

A  bastard  may  carry  the  arms  of  his  father  with  a  traverse,  i.  e.  a  batton-sinister; 
and  take  his  surname  from  the  lordship  from  whence  his  father  titles  himself, 
and  not  the  surname  of  his  father,  unless  he  had  such  title  and  surname  as  the 
said  arms  signify. 

The  bastard  cannot  lay  aside  the  traverse  without  liberty  and  licence  from  the 
chief  of  the  name  and  arms,  and  from  these  of  the  family  carrying  the  same  arms, 
unless  it  be  that  he  place  them  in  a  faux  ecu,  i.  e.  false  shield ;  which  we  take  for 
a  cartouch,  of  which  1  have  treated,  and  given  its  figure  in  the  First  Part  of  this 
System. 

The  sons  of  a  bastard  born  and  procreate  in  lawful  marriage,  if  their  mother  is  a 
gentlewoman,  may  carry  the  arms  of  their  father  and  mother  quarterly,  always 
having  the  traverse  in  the  quarter  of  the  father's  arms  ;  or,  if  otherwise  they  would 
carry  them  without  the  traverse,  they  must  place  them  in  a/a//x  ecu. 

If  a  woman  be  a  bastard,  or  the  daughter  of  one,  she  may  carry  her  father's 
arms,  Vi'ith  the  traverse.  I  shall  here  give  an  instance  of  this  rule  from  Sandford's 
Genealogical  History  of  England :  Antigone,  natural  daughter  of  Humphrey 
Duke  of  Gloucester,  fourth  son  of  King  Henry  IV.  whose  arms  were  France  and 
England,  quarterly,  within  a  bordure  componi,  argent  and  sable.  Flis  natural 
daughter,  Antigone,  carried  the  same  as  her  father,  bruised  with  a  batton-sinister 
a%ure. 

Some  are  of  opinion,  that  a  bastard  woman  marrying  a  gentleman,  is  by  his 
quality  legitimate,  as  Guil .  Benedict.  "  Si  fcemina  bastarda  nupserit  viro  legitimo, 
"  propter  qualitatem  mariti,  etEcitur  legitima,  quia  capacitas  viri  ad  uxorem  por- 
"  rigitur."  And  the  same  says  Scohier,  that  a  female  bastard  married  to  a  gen- 
tleman lawfully  begotten,  the  children  of  such  marriage  shall  not  receive  any 
dishonourable  spot,  because  that  by  the  quality  of  the  husband  she  is  freed,  in  so 
far  as  the  capacity  of  the  husband  is  contributed  to  his  bastard  wife. 

Churchmen  of  the  highest  orders,  if  bastards,  are  obliged  by  the  law  of  armories 
to  have  on  their  fathers'  arms  a  mark  of  illegitimation,  though  they  be  impaled  or 
quartered  with  the  arms  of  their  ecclesiastical  dignities,  and  even  legitimate  by  the 
Pope:  Of  which  practice  the  author  of  Jur'uprudentia  Heroica  gives  us  these  two 
examples:  John,  natural  son  of  John  Intrepidus  Duke  of  Burgundy,  carried  the 
arms  of  his  father,  with  the  batton-sinister,  though  quartered  with  those  of  the 
Episcopal  See  of  Cameracensi;  and  the  same  was  done  by  Anthonie,  a  bastard  of 


28  OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  ^c?c. 

Burgundy,  though  he  was  legitimate  by  the  Pope,  whose  legitimation  qualifies  the 
person  for  holy  orders,  yet  in  temporals  he  behoved  to  be  legitimate  by  the  prince, 
whose  subject  he  is;  and,  in  the  letters  of  legitimation,  there  must  be  orders  ex- 
pressly to  remove  the  mark  of  bastardy,  else  it  will  continue  in  the  arms,  says  our 
author.  And  other  lawyers  tell  us,  as  the  learned  Sir  George  Mackenz.ie,  in  his 
Science  of  Heraldry,  chap.  22.  of  Bastards,  that  legitimation  by  the  prince  does 
not  empower  the  person  who  is  legitimated  to  bear  his  father's  coat,  except  that 
power  were  expressly  contained  in  his  legitimation;  "  Nisi  legitimatio  expresse 
"  ad  delationem  armorum  facta  fuerit,"  Hoppingius  de  Jure  Insigninm,  cap.  7. 
Yet  it  is  certain,  that  such  as  were  once  bastards,  but  are  legitimated  by  subse- 
quent marriage,  may  bear  the  father's  arms  without  any  such  diminution;  for 
there  is  more  reason  and  force  in  legitimation  by  subsequent  marriage,  because  it  is 
natural,  than  in  that  by  the  prince,  inferior  to  nature,  and  only  fictitious,  as, 
Hoppingius  de  Jure  Insigniiim,  paragraph  4.  "  Major  merito  vis  legitimationis 
"  fact:E  per  subsequens  matrimonium,  quam  ei,  qui  per  rescriptum  principis  inesse 
"  debet,  cum  ilia  natura;  hsec  a  lege  natura  satis  inferiore,  proveniat;  ilia  ex  sub- 
"  secuto  matrimonio  sit  vera  &  propria,  \\xc  ficta  &  impropria  dicatur." 


OF  ABATEMENTS. 

Since  I  am  speaking  of  the  diminution  of  arms,  I  shall  only  mention  here  some 
figures,  which  English  heralds  and  others  call  ahatements  of  honour,  lest  I  seem 
wilfully  to  omit  any  thing  relating  to  heraldry :  The  figures  of  which  abatements 
of  honour  were  to  be  added  to  the  arms  of  those  that  are  convicted  of  vice,  and 
acts  of  dishonour.  As  to  those  who  boast  in  martial  acts,  to  a  coward,  to  him  that 
killeth  his  prisoner,  to  an  adulterer,  to  a  liar,  and  to  a  traitor. 

The  figures  and  names  of  these  abatements  I  think  are  not  worth  the  pains  to 
name,  much  less  to  engrave  them;  they  may  be  seen  in  English  books,  and  repre- 
sented by  Sir  George  Mackenzie  in  his  Science  of  Heraldry,  chap.  23.  The  French 
know  no  such  figures;  and  the  learned  Menestrier  calls  them  English  fancies;  and 
Sir  George  Mackenzie  says.  Who  would  bear  such  abatements.'  and  that  he  never 
saw  such  borne  by  any :  neither  have  I  met  with  them  anywhere. 

It  is  true,  by  the  custom  of  Scotland,  reversing  of  the  arms  of  traitors  is  prac- 
tised ;  for  Sir  George  gives  a  distinct  account  in  his  time,  that  when  any  person, 
is  forfaulted  by  parliament,  or  Lords  of  Justiciary,  the  Lyon  King  at  Arms,  and  his 
brethren  Lyon  Heralds  come  into  these  judicatures  in  their  coats,  and  other  for- 
malities, where  the  Lyon  does  publicly  tear  the  arms  of  the  person  forfaulted : 
And  if  he  be  a  cadet  of  a  family,  the  Lyon  proclaims  openly,  at  the  tearing  of 
these  arms,  that  it  shall  be  without  prejudice  to  the  nobleman  or  chief  whose  arms 
they  are.  After  which  he  and  his  brethren  go  to  the  cross,  and  there  hang  up  the 
shield  of  arms  reversed,  turning  the  base  or  lowest  point  upwards.  I  know  not 
what  the  custom  of  England  has  been  in  this  point.  But,  of  late,  there  was  no 
such  formality  used  in  the  pronouncing  the  sentence  of  forfaulture  upon  the  no- 
bility and  gentry  there.  ^ 

The  learned  Sir  George,  in  the  above-mentioned  chapter  adds,  that  it  is  debated 
among  lawyers,  whether  the  children  of  forfaulted  traitors  lose  thus  the  arms  of 
their  predecessors?  The  ordinary  solution  is,  that  if  the  father,  who  was  forfeited, 
was  the  first  that  got  arms,  these  could  not  be  transmitted  to  his  issue:  But 
if  his  arms  pertained  formerly  to  his  family,  then  his  crimes  do  not  debar  his 
posterity  from  using  them:  For  crimes  should  only  infer  punishment  against  the 
committer;  for  which  our  author  cites  several  lawyers.  But  they  advise  them  to- 
erave  restitution  as  the  safer  way.  With  us  the  children  of  forfeited  parents,  do* 
use  their  predecessors'  arms  without  being  restored. 


VolJl  i'/alc  ■-.  J'm 


CHAPTER  II.     Of  CoTnpaf^  a^zd  Marf/uiIIz 


^f^Sf^m!^i^s>my^^'^'s^^m^mimm^^mmmm^ 


V 


OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  5i<,-.  29 


CHAP.     II. 

OF  COMPOSING  AND  MARSHALLING  OF  ARMS. 

HAVING  given  before  the  three  ends  and  designs  of  armories,  I  am  come 
now  to  the  fourth ;  which  is,  to  iUustrate  persons,  families  and  communities, 
with  marks  of  noble  descent,  and  other  additaments  of  honour,  within  or  •without  the 
shield.  Of  those  within,  I  am  to  treat  in  this,  and  of  those  without,  in  the  follow- 
ing chapters. 

These  w  ithin  the  shield  are  added  to  the  paternal  figures,  by  way  of  composing, 
or  marshalling. 

The  first  is  done  by  adding  marks  of  honour,  or  some  part  of  the  arms  of  ano- 
ther family,  to  the  paternal  arms,  without  any  distinction  of  quarters. 

Marsh.''linj  of  arms  is  when  ensigns  of  honour,  or  the  entire  arms  of  other  fa- 
milies, are  joined  with  the  paternal  ones  of  the  bearer,  by  partition  lines,  making 
distinct  areas  or  quadras  in  one  shield. 

Composing  of  arms  is  frequent  with  us,  not  only  to  chiefs,  heads  of  families,  and 
thers,  to  show  their  alliance  with  other  families,  but  also  to  cadets;  by  adding  to 
their  paternal  bearings  some  part  of  their  mother's  arms,  to  show  their  maternal 
descent,  and  to  difference  themselves  from  other  descendants  of  the  same  family ; 
Oi'  vvhich  I  have  treated  in  the  former  chapter. 

Anciently  arms  were  single  and  plain,  consisting  of  few  figures;  but  in  later 
times  they  are  not  only  looked  upon  as  hereditary  ensigns  of  honour,  but  as  marks 
of  noble  descent,  alliance,  property,  or  right  to  territories  and  lands,  oflices,  and 
o;her  valuable  things  in  their  possession,  or  of  their  right  and  pretension  to  the 
sa^ne. 

These  arms,  or  marks  of  alliance,  offices,  and  property,  were  not  carried  of  old 
iii  'Ue  shield  as  now,  but  in  different  shields,  using  sometimes  one  shield  of  paternal 
aiiii^,  and  another  of  alliance,  &c.  as  occasion  required. 

UpoQ  their  seals  appended  to  deeds  and  evidents,  we  find  several  shields  (which 
we  caii  collateral  ones)  with  distinct  arms,  to  show  their  right  and  pretensions  to 
different  feoffs;  which  gave  occasion  for  seals  to  be  made  with  two  sides,  a  face 
a.id  a  reverse,  as  we  see  the  ancient  seals  of  sovereigns  and  great  men.  The  face 
is  that  where  a  man  is  represented  enthroned,  or  on  horseback  with  a  shield  of 
arms,  called  the  royal  or  equestrian  side  or  face  of  the  shield :  And  on  the  other 
side,  the  reverse  of  the  seal,  are  ordinarily  the  seal  of  the  owner's  proper  arms. 

Upon  the  equestrian  side  of  the  seal  a  man  is  ordinarily  represented  on  horse- 
back in  his  surcoat,  upon  which  wtre  ordinarily  depicted  his  coat  of  arms.  On 
the  caparison  of  his  horse  were  other  arms.  On  the  shield  and  buckler,  which  he 
holds  by  his  left  arm,  were  likewise  different  arms:  And  on  the  reverse  of  the  seal, 
another  shield  of  arms,  accompanied  with  several  other  shields  of  arms,  commonly 
called  collateral  shields,  because  at  the  sides  of  the  principal  or  paternal  shield, 
which  they  accompany;  as  are  to  be  seen  on  foreign  coins,  such  as  dollars,  &c. 
To  illustrate  this  practice,  I  shall  bring  a  few  examples  from  Olivarius  Uredus  his 
Collections  of  the  Seals  of  the  Earls  of  Flanders,  from  our  own  country,  and  from 
Sandford's  Genealogical  History  of  England. 

Baldwin  Count  of  Hainault  and  Marquis  of  Namur.,  his  seal  of  arms  had  two 
sides,  face  and  reverse:  on  the  first  was  a  man  on  horseback,  brandishing  a  sword, 
about  whose  neck  hung  a  shield  of  the  arms  of  the  Earldom  of  Hainault ;  and  on  the 
reverse,  was  a  shield  of  arms  of  the  iVIarquis  of  Namur,  in  the  year  11 78.  He 
having  married  Margaret,  sistei-jand  heir  of  Philip  Ear!  of  Flanders,  she  bore  to  him 
Baldwin  Earl  of  Flanders,  who  carried  on  his  seal  the  arms  of  Flanders,  and  the 
arms  of  Lusitania,  and  those  of  Hannonia,  indistinct  shields:  So  it  app.-ars  that  the 
custom  of  marshalling  several  arms  in  one  shield  was  not  then  in  use  with  the 
Earls  of  Flanders,  till  the  Burgundian  race,  which  began  in  Philip  Duke  of  Bur- 
gundy, a  younger  son  of  John  King  of  France,  who  was  observed  to  be  the  first 
that  quartered  the  arms  of  Burgundy  modern  with  these  of  Burgundy  ancient. 
He  married  Margaret  the  daughter  and  heir  of  Lodovick  Farl  of  Flanders,  and 
impaled  her  arms  with  his  own  in  one  shield.     Other  great  men  in  that  country, 

Vol.  II.  H 


i«> 


OF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  'i^c. 


and  in  the  countries  near  thereto,   in   imitation,  began  to  marshal  other  arms  witli 
their  own  in  one  shield. 

The  practice  of  collateral  shields  was  also  in  Scotland  before  the  use  of  mar- 
shalling was  frequent,  as  appears  by  the  seal  of  arms  of  Walter  Leslie,  who  mar- 
ried Euphame  Ross,  eldest  daughter  and  one  of  the  co-heirs  of  William  Earl  of 
Ross,  appended  to  a  charter  of  his,  in  the  year  1375,  upon  which  were  three 
shields  of  arms;  That  in  the  middle,  between  two  collateral  ones,  had  the  arms  of 
the  Earldom  of  R.oss,  three  lions  rampant;  that  on  the  right  side  was  the  shield 
of  the  amis  of  Leslie,  having  a  bend  charged  with  three  buckles;  and  on  the  left 
was  a  shield  with  three  garbs,  for  Ciunin,  or  the  country  of  Buchan.  Those  three 
arms  were  quartered  formally  in  one  shield  a  few  years  after,  when  marshalling 
of  arms  came  in  use. 

Another  instance  of  collateral  shields  of  arms  with  us  is  that  one  of  William 
Keith,  Marischal  of  Scotland,  and  Margaret  Fraser  his  spouse,  appended  to  a  char- 
ter of  theirs  to  Robert  Keith  their  son,  of  the  barony  of  Strachan,  in  the  sheriff- 
dom of  Kincardine,  loth  September  1375,  which  ends  thus.  In  cujus  rei  testimoniimi 
sigilla  nostra  consimiUter  sunt  appensa;  which  I  caused  engrave  in  an  Essay  of  the 
Ancient  and  Modern  Use  of  Armories,  page  36.  Upon  which  seal  were  three 
shields ;  that  on  the  right  had  a  chief  paly  of  six  pieces,  the  arms  of  Keith  Ma- 
rischal ;  on  the  second,  six  cinquefoils  disposed  3,  2  and  i,  which  was  for  his  lady; 
and  the  third  had  more  figures;  but  being  defaced,  I  cannot  tell  upon  what  ac- 
count it  was  there  placed. 

Euphame  Ross,  second  wife  to  King  Robert  II.  is  represented  on  her  seal  sitting 
in  a  chair  of  state;  at  her  right  hand,  is  the  shield  of  the  arms  of  Scotland,  and  at 
her  left  that  of  the  earldom  of  Ross,  her  paternal  coat. 

I  have  also  seen  the  seal  of  Euphame  Stewart,  daughter  and  heir  of  David  Earl 
of  Strathern,  by  his  second  wife,  appended  to  a  charter  of  the  date  1389,  wherein 
she  is  designed  Eupham  Senescal,  Comitissa  Palatina  de  Strathern :  on  which  seal 
was  the  picture  of  a  woman  at  length,  holding  by  each  hand  a  shield ;  that  in  the 
right  was  charged  with  two  cheverons,  for  Strathern ;  upon  the  other,  by  the  left, 
was  a  fesse  cheque,  for  Stewart:  Which  two  arms  v/ere  afterwards  composed  to- 
gether in  one  shield  by  her  successors  of  the  name  of  Graham,  Earls  of  Strathern 
and  Monteith,  and  quartered  with  the  arms  of  Graham. 

The  same  practice  of  carrying  different  arms  in  distinct  shields  was  with  the 
English,  as  in  Sandford's  Genealogical  History  of  England :  There  he  gives  the 
seal  of  arms  of  Eleanor  queen  to  Edward  I.  of  England,  being  a  daughter  of  the 
King  of  Castile  and  Leon :  upon  the  one  side  of  the  seal  was  her  effigies,  at  her 
right  side  was  a  castle,  and  below  it  a  lion ;  and  at  her  left  side  a  lion,  and  below 
it  a  castle,  so  disposed  as  they  were  marshalled  in  her  father's  arms,  (the  way  of 
marshalling  not  being  fhen  known  in  England)  and  upon  the  reverse  of  her  seal 
■was  the  escutcheon  of  England. 

Isabel,  daughter  of  Philip  IV.  of  France,  queen  to  Edward  11.  of  England,  had 
her  effigies  on  her  seal  between  two  shields:  That  on  the  right  hand  had  the  arms 
of  England,  and  the  other,  on  the  left,  the  arms  of  France,  impaled  with  the  arms 
of  Navarre,  being  those  of  her  mother  Joan  Qiieen  of  France,  who  was  the  daugh- 
ter and  heir  of  Henry  I.  King  of  Navarre.  This  practice,  says  our  author,  of 
having  the  arms  of  husband  and  wife  on  diiFerent  shields,  was  before  the  method 
of  impaling  arms;  but  the  practice  was  then  in  France,  as  by  the  foresaid  example 
of  France  impaled  with  Navarre. 

From  the  practice  of  collateral  shields  with  distinct  arms  came  the  custom  of 
carrying  two  shields  accoUe;  that  is,  when  two  shields  of  different  arms  are  joined 
together,  as  Plate  I.  fig.  3.  The  Kings  of  France  have  been,  and  are  in  use  still 
to  carry  their  arms  accoUi  with  those  of  the  kingdom  of  Navarre,  since  the  union 
of  those  two  crowns  in  the  person  of  Henry  IV.  of  France  :  But,  however,  I  doubt 
not  but  this  method  of  joining  two  shields  of  arms  together,  of  the  husband  and 
wife,  proceeded  from  the  ancient  use  of  collateral  shields,  before  the  way  of  mar- 
shaUing  or  impaling  husband  and  wife  came  in  use ;  of  which  there  is  a  particular  in- 
stance, in  Sandford's  History,  of  the  seal  of  Margaret  Dutchess  of  Norfolk, 
daughter  of  '^dward  I.  and  widow  of  two  successive  husbands,  in  the  reign  of  her 
brother  Edward  II.     Upon  her  seal  she  had  her  own  shield  of  arms,  being  those  of 


spF  ADDITIONAL  FIGURES,  iJc 


31 


England  between  two  other  shields  accolU;  that  on  the  right  containing  the  arms 
of  !ier  first  hu.^band  John  Lord  Segkavk,  viz.  a  lion  rampant;  on  the  other,  on 
the  left,  the  arms  of  iier  second  husband  Sir  Walter  Mannay,  or,  three  cheverons 
sable.  This  way  of  carrying  liusband  and  wife's  arms  accollt  lias  been  practised 
in  France  and  England,  as  also  in  Scotland,  on  old  paintings  and  carvings  on  the 
eatnes  of  old  houses,  which  1  have  seen,  though  not  frequently  now  practised. 

Before  I  proceed  to  regular  marshalling  of  several  arms  in  one  shield,  it  will  not 
be  much  out  of  the  way  to  give  here  the  division  of  arms  occasioned  by  the  fore- 
said practice  of  carrying  many  coats  of  arms  in  distinct  shields,  upon  dilVerent 
reasons;  and  thereafter  marshalling  many  in  one  shield,  which  has  given  occasion 
to  lawyers  to  divide  arms  into  several  kinds,  as  the  famous  Hopingius  dc  Jure  Iii- 
signium,  gives  nine  sorts  of  arms,  imo,  plain  arms,  arma  simplicia,  are  these  whicii 
have  no  addition  of  any  other  figure;  but  being  plain,  as  carried  by  the  first  of 
the  family,  such  as  these  of  kings,  princes,  and  earls  of  old,  without  composition 
or  marshalling;  such  as  these  of  Burgundy,  says  our  author,  were  of  old,  or,  a  lion 
rampant  gules,  crowned  azure.  The  Princes  of  Henneburg  carried  only  a  hen, 
without  the  eagle  as  now.  The  Duke  of  Brunswick  carried,  of  old,  only  one  lion, 
but  afterwards  more.  And  the  like  simple  or  plain  arms,  says  our  autlior,  had  the 
nobles  of  Denmark  and  Sweden  from  the  Goths  and  Vandals.  The  same  practice 
was  with  our  sovereigns  and  nobles.  At  first  our  kings  carried  only  or,  a  lion 
rampant  gules;  but  afterwards  the  double  tressure  was  added  by  a  gift  of  Charles 
the  Great  of  France.  The  princely  family  of  Stewart  had  only  a  fesse  cheque, 
but  afterwards  accompanied  or  marshalled  with  other  figures;  and  the  same  I  may 
say  of  the  rest  of  our  nobility,  who  have  some  figures  or  other  accompanying  or 
quartering  with  their  ancient  ones;  except  the  Earls  Marischal,  and  Hay  Earl  of 
Errol,  Constable  of  Scotland,  who  have  their  ancient,  simple,  and  plain  arms. 
Our  author  likewise  tells  us,  that  the  ancient  Celti  distinguished  their  shields  only 
with  various  colours,  and  the  Germans  arms  were  paly,  bendy,  cheque,  or  lozengy, 
without  other  figures  which  are  plain  arms:  His  words  are,  "  Nobiles  homines 
"  apud  priscos  Celtos  lectissimis  tantum  coloribus  sua  singulos  distinxisse  scuta ; 
"  unde  etiamnum  ea  omnium  antiqinssima  ac  maxime  genuina  apud  Germanos 
"  nobilitatis  dicuntur  insignia,  quce  omnium  simplicissima,  certis  duntaxat  spaciis 
"  ac  coloribus  distincta,  in  quibus  sunt  ilia  quae  Latini,  laterculos,  &-  virgas,  &. 
"  rhombos  appellarunt:"  For  which  he  cites  Limneus. 

ido.  Composed  arms,  compojita  insignia,  when  other  figures  or  quarters  are  added 
to  plain  or  simple  arms ;  of  which  I  have  given  many  instances  in  this  System  first 
and  last. 

3?/o,  Ancient  Arms,  antiqua  sen  fumosa  insignia,  are  those  carried  by  old  families, 
and  transmitted  down  to  their  successors  in  honour  and  dignity  ;  and  the  longer 
the  progression  is,  they  are  the  more  noble,  as  our  author  says  of  nobihty  ;  "  Et 
"  quo  longius  procedit,  eo  magis  augetur  S*-  cum  generis  vetustate  primorum  orna- 
"  mentorum  conjunctim  habet."  The  English  call  these  perfect  arms;  by  which 
they  understand  these  of  a  hereditary  descent,  though  no  further  transmitted  but 
from  the  first  obtainer  to  his  grandson  ;  which  are  ensigns  with  them  of  a  perfect 
and  complete  nobility,  begun  in  the  grandfather,  (as  heralds  say)  growing  in  the 
son,  complete  in  the  grandson,  or  rather  great-grandson,  as  some  will  have  it  : 
from  which  rises  the  distinction  of  gentlemen  of  coat-armour  in  the  father  and  the 
son  ;  and  gentlemen  of  blood  in  the  grandson,  or  great-grandson ;  and  from  the 
last  descend  gentlemen  of  ancestry. 

4fo,  By  Imperfect  Arms  they  do  not  understand  irregular  or  defective  arms  in 
rer.pect  of  tincture  or  figure,  but  of  new  ones  granted  to  the  first  receiver,  who  had 
none  before,  and  are  but  signs  of  imperfect  nobility  in  the  receiver  ;  upon  which 
he  is  called  a  gentleman  of  coat-armour,  being  the  same  with  the  Novus  Homo  with 
the  Romans  ;  the  first  obtainer  of  Jus  Imaginum,  i.  e.  the  right  of  erecting  his  own 
image  or  statue,  as  a  sign  of  begun  nobility  ;  as  the  first  concession  of  arms  was 
afterwards  with  other  nations.  These  may  be  likewise  said  to  be  new  arms, 
though  ancient  in  some  families,  which  have  been  lately  assumed  by  others,  by 
right  of  adoption,  marriage  or  disposition ;  called  nova  insignia,  qua  noviter  per 
ipsos  novas  nobiles  sunt  qucesita. 


32  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  iSc. 

e,to.  Proper  or  Paternal  Arms,  are  these  which  are  the  fixed  figures  of  the  family 
and  surname,  and  distinguished  from  additional  ones  :  "  Propria  insignia,"  says  our 
author,  "  sunt  ea  qua:  de  jure  pertinent  ad  propriam  familiam  vel  personam." 

6to,  Strange  Arms,  aliena  insignia,  are  these  belonging  to  another  family  or 
person,  carried  by  those  who  have  right  to  use  or  quarter  them  with  their  own. 

imo.  True  Arms,  vera  insignia,  are  these  which  are  granted  by  authority,  or  any 
other  legal  way,  upon  the  account  of  virtue  and  glorious  efforts. 

'^vo.  False  Anns,  falsa  insignia,  are  to  be  understood  in  two  respects,  first,  these 
granted  or  disponed  by  those  who  have  no  right.  Secondly,  These  granted  to  one 
beyond  his  merit,  nobility  and  dignity,  fit  and  competent  for  those  of  higher 
degrees ;  as  our  author,  "  Quod  non  sunt  competentia,  quod  altiorem  respiciant 
"  ordinem,  atque  inde  altioris  ordinis  insignia." 

g;;o.  More  Noble  Arms,  nohiJiora  insignia,  are  not  so  by  the  nature  of  the  figures 
they  have  (as  some  think)  but  as  they  fitly  represent  the  biave  actions  of  some  of 
their  progenitors,  regularly  disposed,  and  artfully  situate  in  the  shield,  to  incite 
posterity  to  imitate  the  virtuous  actions  of  their  predecessors ;  as  our  author, 
"  Nobiliora  insignia,  non  ex  nobiliori  imagine  (ut  vulgo  creditur)  sed  ex  rebus  a 
"  quopiam  proavorum  prreclare  gestis  ac  clypeo  inscriptis,  dijudicanda  veniunt,  ita 
"  utquando  habeant  plus  artis,  ingenii  Siefficaciae,  ad  amnios  monitu  suocontuendos, 
"  tanto  excellentiora  reputentur." 

Sir  John  Feme,  in  his  Glory  of  Generosity,  divides  arms  into  abstract  and  ter- 
minal ones :  the  first  are  the  same  with  the  above-mentioned  perfect  arms,  being 
abstracted  and  carried  down  by  the  heirs  and  representatives  of  the  first  obtainer, 
without  alteration,  diminution  or  addition  ;  and  are  these  which  we  now  call 
original,  principal  and  paternal  arms.  By  terminal  arms,  he  understands  these  of 
younger  sons  and  cadets,  who  have  right  to  carry  their  paternal  arms,  terminate 
and  difierenced  with  congruous  marks  of  cadency,  to  show  the  time  and  seniority 
of  their  descents. 

There  are  several  other  sorts  of  arms  named,  from  the  causes  of  their  bearing ; 
as  these  oi  marriage,  of  office,  arms  of  alliance,  arms  of  adoption,  arms  of  patronage, 
of  gratitude,  of  religion,  concessions  general  and  special ;  arms  of  sovereignties, 
feudal  ones,  and  pretensions  to  the  same.  All  which  I  shall  treat  separately,  and 
show  the  precedei'.cy  due  to  them  in  their  respective  quarters  with  other  arms, 
when  marshalled  together. 


ARMS  MAP.SHALLED  TOGETHER  IN  ONE    SHIELD,  UPON    THE    ACCOUNT  OF    MARRIAGE 
AND  OKFICES. 

Marriage  has  be'en  one  of  the  chief  causes  of  marshalling  different  coats  of  arms 
in  one  shield.  The  practice  is  but  late  ;  and  lawyers  of  old  tell  us  that  women 
cannot  carry  arms,  for  that  is  a  manly  and  not  a  feminine  office,  they  not  being 
exercised  in  war,  nor  in  the  use  of  military  instruments,  upon  which  arms  were 
first  to  be  seen  ;  besides,  they  are  looked  upon  as  the  end  of  their  own  family,  and 
these  married  go  into  another  family,  and  are  incapable  of  the  name  and  arms  of 
their  paternal  family,  as  lawyers  say,  especially  Ulpian  and  others  ;  "  Soroiem 
"  etiam  dictam  putat  quasi  seorsum  nascatur  ab  eaque  domo  separetur,  qua  nata 
"  est."  But  by  the  custom  of  nations,  daughters  are  allowed  to  use  the  arms  of 
their  lathers:  Hoppingius  de  Jure  Insignium,  proposes  a  difference  between  daughters 
married  and  unmarried  :  the  first,  being  incorporate  in  another  family,  do  not  carry 
their  father's  arms,  as  these  .unmarried,  who  may  carry  them  to  the  effect  to  show 
their  name  and  agnition  in  their  father's  family  ;  whereas  those  married  do  not 
carry  their  paternal  arms  to  that  effect,  but  only  for  ostentation  of  their  descent, 
as  our  author,  "  Ad  originis  claritatem,  antiquitatem  generis,  memoriamque  inde 
"  arguendam  8^  conservandam,  introductum  est."  Neither  can  their  children 
properly  carry  their  arms :  "  Matris  insignia  Hberi  regulariter  deferri  nequeunt." 
For,  being  in  their  father's  fainily,  they  have  their  rise  and  surname  from  it,  and 
not  from  their  mother.  "  Et  ha;c  sunt  praecipuum  agnitionis  &-  familiae  indicium  :" 
The  descendants  of  a  daughter  cannot  regularly  carry  the  paternal  arms  of  their 
mother,  except  they  be  heiresses,  or  be  allowed  by  those  of  their  mother's  side,  who 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  isic. 


33 


have  right  to  dispose  of  the  arms  by  way  of  testament  or  disposition,  or  else  they 
be  allowed  by  the  laws  and  customs  of  the  country. 

Our  author  citeth  another  lawyer,  Andreas  Aliciatus,  who  says,  that  a  son  cannot 
carry  the  arms  of  his  mother  ;  yet  when  the  nobility  of  his  mother  is  more  eminent 
than  his  father's,  and  illustrate  by  it,  he  may  carry  the  arms  of  his  mother  with 
those  of  his  father's,  according  to  the  custom  of  many  countries  and  kingdoms ;  as 
in  Italy  and  Spain,  and  I  may  say  the  same  is  practised  in  Britain.  His  words  I 
shall  here  add,  cap.  ii.  "  Q\iam vis  Andreas  Aliciatus  dicat  lilio  matris  insignia 
"  gerere  concessum  non  esse  ;  attamen  cum  nobilitas  paterna  ex  nobilitate  materna 
"  splendidior  illustriorque  efficiatur,  consuetudme  nonnullarum  provinciarum  i^. 
"  regnorum,  turn  Hispania;  tum  Italian,  arma  gentilitia,  paterna  ac  materna,  simu! 
"  colligari  observatur." 

By  the  custom  of  nations,  wives  may  use  the  arms  of  their  husbands  ;  for  being 
in  their  families  they  have  a  right  to  the  honour  and  privileges  of  the  same :  as 
Hoppingius^f  Jure  Insignium,  par.  8.  "  Ratio,  qui  transit  m  alterius  tamiliam,  is  ejus 
"  origine,  nomme  &-  privilegiis,  gaudet,  nobilitatisque  &  dignitatis  fit  particeps, 
"  adeo  ut  insignia  deferendi  jus  transeunti  denegari  non  posse,  atqui  omnis  uxoi: 
"  transit  in  familiam  mariti  ;  ergo  uxori  jus  deferendi  insignia  mariti  recte  dene- 
"  gari  non  poterit." 

Though  the  wife  be  ignoble  and  a  bastard,  she  has  right  to  make  use  of  the  arms 
of  her  husband  ;  as  our  author,  "  Non  impedit,  quod  uxor  ignobilis  &•  plebeia, 
"  maritus  vero  nobilis  extat ;  similiter  non  refert,  quod  mulier  spuria  ;  nam  nulla 
"  major  unio  quam  conjugalis,  nee  negamus,  quin  oleum  non  consecratum,  conse- 
"  crato  possit  oleo  commisceri."  But  it  is  not  so  with  the  ignoble  husband  who 
has  a  noble  wife ;  by  her  he  is  not  nobilitate,  nor  can  properly  carry  her  arms, 
because  wives  receive  honour  from  their  husbands,  but  do  not  give  it ;  as  our 
author,  "  Vir  ignobilis,  ducendo  uxorem  nobilem,  non  nobilitetur  per  earn,  cum 
"  accipiant,  non  adferant  nubentes  mulieres  dignitatem." 

After  the  husband's  decease  the  widow  may  continue  to  have  the  arms  of  her 
husband  upon  all  her  utensils ;  but  if  she  proves  vicious  or  unchaste,  she  loses  the 
honours  of  her  husband,  says  our  author  ;  and  if  she  marry  again,  she  must  follow 
the  condition  of  her  second  husband,  and  cannot  use  the  arms  of  her  first  husband, 
especially  when  she  marries  again  one  of  an  inferior  quality  to  her  first  husband, 
whose  honour  she  loses ;  which  holds  with  us,  and  in  England ;  as  Sir  George 
Mackenzie  in  his  Precedency,  "  Yet  sometimes  the  king  allows  her  the  same  pre- 
"  cedency  and  honours  of  her  first  husband,  or  these  of  her  father,  by  a  letter  ;  as 
"  he  does  also  to  the  daughters  of  dukes  and  others,  who  have  lost  their  honour  bj 
"  marriage  :  which  letters  or  warrants  are  directed  to  the  Herald  Office,  and  regis- 
"  trate  there." 

Having  shown  the  right  women  have  to  carry  arms,  I  shall  now  proceed  to  show 
in  what  form  and  manner  they  have  been  in  use  to  carry  them. 

When  arms  came  to  be  hereditary  to  all  the  issue  of  great  men,  as  tesseras,  and 
marks  of  a  noble  descent,  women  then  began  to  make  use  of  those  of  their  fathers, 
on  their  habits,  and  to  have  them  in  square  figures,  called  lozenges,  qx  fusile  shields, 
to  show  their  descent,  and  at  length  to  join  tliem  with  those  of  their  husbands. 

The  practice  seems  to  be  ancient,  by  women  placing  their  paternal  arms  upon 
their  habits,  such  as  mantles  and  kirtles,  as  may  be  seen  in  old  illuminate  books  of 
heraldry,  and  other  paintings.  Eminent  ladies  are  there  represented  with  arms  on 
their  mantles  and  kirtles :  and  heralds  tell  us,  when  the  same  arms  are  both  on 
mantle  and  kiitle,  they  are  then  the  arms  of  their  fathers  ;  but  when  there  are  arms 
on  the  mantle  different  from  these  on  the  under  habit,  the  kirtle,  she  is  then  mar- 
ried. These  on  the  mantle  belong  to  her  husband,  who  is  as  a  cloak  or  mantle  to 
shroud  the  wife  from  all  violence  ;  and  the  other  arms  on  the  kirtle  belong  to  her 
father ;  for  women  have  no  proper  arms  of  their  own,  but  these  of  their  fathers : 
yet,  in  later  times,  we  meet  with  some  concessions  of  arms  granted  by  sovereigns 
to  virtuous  ladies :  of  which  afterwards. 

By  the  universal  practice  of  Europe,  unmarried  women  must  place  their  pater- 
nal arms  in  lozenges  or  fusile  shields,  and  cannot  place  them  in  formal  triangular 
shields  as  men  do,  except  they  be  sovereign  queens  or  princesses,  ^lia  nat^tram 
nobilioris  sexus  participant,  says  Sir  Tohn  Feme  in  his  Glorv  of  Generosity;  and  that 

VoL.U.       ^         ^      •     ^         J        I 


34  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ^c. 

sovereign  princesses  may  trim  their  shield  of  arms  with  all  the  exterior  ornaments 
belonging  to  a  king  or  sovereign  prince :  as  Mary,  Queen  of  Scotland,  carried  the 
royal  achievement  of  that  kingdom  entire  ;  and  the  same  did  Queen  Elizabeth 
that  of  England.  Qiieen  dowagers,  it  seems,  are  not  allowed  to  carry  the  sovereign 
arms,  though  impaled  with  their  own,  but  in  a  lozenge  :  for  an  instance  I  shall 
mention  the  seal  of  arms  of  Jean,  Queen  Dowager  of  King  James  L  mother  of  King 
James  IE  a  daughter  of  John  Earl  of  Somerset,  appended  to  an  indenture  betwixt 
her  and  Sir  Alexander  Livingston  of  Callendar,  anent  the  delivery  of  her  son,  the 
young  king,  to  be  kept  by  tlie  said  Sir  Alexander  in  the  castle  of  Stirling,  of  date 
the  4th  September  1439.  On  her  seal  was  a  lozenge  shield,  with  the  arms  of 
Scotland  on  the  right,  impaled  with  her  own  on  the  left  side,  having  France  and 
England  quarterly  within  a  border  gobonated. 

Custom,  in  some  countries,  has  allowed  wives  to  place  their  arms  within  a  formal 
shield,  provided  it  be  close  joined  on  the  left  of  their  husband's  ;  which  way  is 
called  accolle,  or  impaled  with  the  arms  of  their  husband  in  one  formal  shield,  either 
by  dimidiation  or  impalement,  or  by  way  of  escutcheon  over  the  husband's  arms, 
while  the  husband  is  in  life. 

The  way  of  carrying  husband  and  wife's  arms  accolle  has  been  practised  in 
France,  though  not  frequently,  as  fvlenestner  observes,  and  very  seldom  to  be  met 
with  among  us. 

The  impaling  of  husband  and  wife's  arms  in  one  shield  is  more  frequent;  which 
is  done  two  ways,  the  first  by  dimidiation,  the  second  by  an  entire  impalement. 
Dimidiation  is  when  the  wife's  entU'C  arms  are  placed  irpon  the  left  half  of  the 
husband's  arms ;  as  by  the  seal  of  arms  of  Philip  the  Bold,  Duke  of  Burgundy,  in 
the  year  1381,  who  carried  quarterly.  Burgundy,  modern  and  ancient.  Upon  his 
marriage  with  the  daughter  and  heiress  of  Lodovick  Earl  of  Flanders,  his  arms 
were  dimidiate  with  his  wife's,  being  argent,  a  lion  rampant  sable  ;  which  were 
placed  upon  the  left  half  of  her  husband's  quartered  arms,  so  that  the  second  and 
fourth  quarters  were  absconded,  and  the  first  and  third  quarters  of  the  husband's 
only  seen  ;  which  I  have  caused  engrave  in  an  essay  of  armories,  Plate  U.  fig.  2. 
Mary,  Qiieen  of  Scotland,  when  married  to  Francis  IL  of  France,  on  her  great 
seal  had  the  arms  of  Scotland  and  France  dimidiate  ;  the  arms  of  Scotland  lying 
on  the  left  half  of  the  French  arms,  being  azure,  three  fiower-de-luces  or,  two  in 
chief,  and  one  in  base ;  so  that  the  flower-de-luce  in  the  sinister  chief  point,  ancJ 
half  of  the  flower-de-luce  in  base,  are  absconded  by  the  arms  of  Scotland.  Many 
other  instances  of  this  practice  I  have  given  in  a  former  essay. 

Entire  impalement  is  by  dividing  the  field  of  arms  into  two  equal  parts  by  a 
paler  line  or  purfle  of  a  pencil.  The  husband's  arms  are  entire  on  the  right,  and 
the  wife's  so  on  the  left,  which  make  an  entire  whole  ;  and  these  are  called  by  the 
English  baron  iindfem?ne.  By  this  way  of  impaling,  which  is  now  frequently  used, 
no  figure  is  absconded  or  cut  off,  except  sometimes  that  side  of  the  border  of  the 
husband's  or  wife's  arms  that  is  next  to  the  paler  or  dividing  line. 

The  English,  as  Guillim,  make  a  distinction  of  marriage,  single  and  hereditary; 
the  one  bring  off  no  hereditary  possessions,  the  other  do,  being  married  with 
heiresses :  the  first  has  these  forms  above  mentioned  of  marshalling  ;  but  their 
children  shall  have  no  further  to  do  with  the  mother's  coat  (says  our  author)  than 
to  set  up  the  same  in  their  house  pale-ways,  after  the  foresaid  manner,  so  to  conti- 
nue the  memorial  of  their  father's  match  with  such  a  family.  But,  as  I  have  said 
before,  the  children  of  the  single  match  have  right  to  take  a  part  of  their  mother's 
coat,  and  compose  with  their  paternal  figures,  to  show  their  descent,  and  difference 
tliemselves  from  other  branches  of  the  family.  The  hereditary  marriage  (says  our 
author)  has  a  prerogative  which  the  former  has  not :  that  the  baron,  having  re- 
ceived issue  from  the  femme,  it  is  in  his  choice  whether  he  will  bear  her  coat  by 
impalement,  or  else  in  an  escutcheon  upon  his  own ;  and  the  heir  of  these  two  in- 
heritors shall  bear  these  two  hereditary  coats  of  his  father  and  mother  to  himself 
and  his  heirs  quarterly,  to  show  that  the  inheritance  as  well  of  the  possession,  as  of 
the  coat  of  arms,  are  invested  in  them  and  their  posterity. 

There  are  three  rules  observed  in  impaling  the  arms  of  husband  and  wife  :  First, 
that  the  husband's  arms  are  always  placed  on  the  right,  as  baron,  and  these  of  the 
^emme  on  the  left  side.     Secondly,  Herald.s  tell  us  that  no  husband  can  impale  his 


or  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  "isc.  ;5- 

wife's  anr.s  with  his  own  on  the  surcoat  of  his  arms,  ensignb  and  banners,  upon  the 
account  of  baran  and  femme  only  ;  but  when  they  are  the  arms  of  dignified  feus, 
to  which  he  has  right  by  his  wife,  he  may  then  use  them  on  such  utensils  as  arms 
of  pretension,  and  of  feudal  ones.  Thirdly,  when  the  husband  impales  the  wife's 
arms  with  his  own,  he  cannot  surround  the  shield  with  his  royal  order  of  knight- 
hood, as  that  of  the  thistle  and  garter,  &.c.  as  Sandford  observes  :  for  this  reason, 
though  a  husband  may  give  the  equal  half  of  his  escutcheon  and  hereditary  honour, 
yet  he  cannot  share  his  temporary  order  of  knighthood  with  her;  so  that  the 
knights-companions  of  any  sovereign  order  cannot,  by  the  practice  of  heraldry, 
surround  their  shield  of  arms  with  collars  of  sovereign  orders,  when  their  wives' 
arms  are  impaled  with  them,  merely  upon  account  of  baron  and  femme.  Yet,  in 
my  opinion,  the  collar  may  be  placed  at  the  side  of  the  husband's  part  of  the 
shield,  for  his  honour,  except  they  be  sovereigns  of  these  orders,  who  have  an  here- 
ditary right,  whether  mala  or  female.  The  kings  of  England  and  Scotland  have 
been  in  use  to  surround  their  arms  impaled  with  their  queens,  with  their  respective 
orders  of  knighthood,  of  which  they  were  sovereigns.  1  have  seen  the  arms  of 
Francis  King  of  France,  impaled  with  those  of  his  Queen,  Mary  of  Scotland, 
surrounded  with  the  collar  of  the  Order  of  St  Michael,  and  also  her  arms  alone, 
surrounded  with  the  Order  of  the  Thistle,  of  which  she  was  sovereign  ;  and  are  so 
engraven  on  the  boxing  of  the  chimney  in  the  great  hall  of  the  palace  of  Seaton, 
(called  palace  in  our  kings'  charters  to  the  Earls  of  Winton),  and  on  the  other  side 
■AXi  the  arms  of  George  Lord  Seaton,  surrounded  with  the  collar  of  the  Order  of  St 
Andrew  or  Thistle.  1304323 

Mary  Queen  of  England  had  her  arms  impaled  witli  those  of  her  husband, 
Philip  of  Spain,  surrounded  with  the  Order  of  the  Garter.  Those  instances  cannot 
be  a  precedent  for  any  less  concerned ;  for  Francis  and  Mary  were  sovereigns  of 
orders,  and  Philip  only  a  knight  of  the  last.  It  seems  by  this  practice  that  the 
widows  of  sovereigns,  though  their  arms  continue  impaled  with  their  deceased  prin- 
ces's,  are  not  surrounded  with  the  collars  of  their  orders  :  for,  as  I  observed,  albeit 
the  Archduke  of  Austria,  and  Duke  of  Burgundy,  sovereign  of  the  Order  of  the 
Golden  Fleece,  having  married  Isabel  Infanta,  daughter  and  heir  of  Philip  II.  of 
Spain,  marshalled  her  arms  with  his  own,  and  surrounded  them  with  the  collar  of 
the  Golden  Fleece,  when  alive,  being  sovereign  of  that  order ;  but  after  his  death, 
his  princess  carried  the  arms  of  her  deceased  husband  impaled  with  her  own,  and, 
instead  of  being  surrounded  with  the  foresaid  collar,  it  was  only  with  a  cordelier, 
as  on  her  seal,  in  OHvarius  Uredus's  Collections.  Since  I  am  speaking  of  Isabel 
Infanta  of  Spain,  and  the  fashion  of  her  armorial  bearing  when  a  wife,  and  a  widow, 
I  think  it  not  improper  here  to  show  her  shield  of  arms  when  a  maid,  being  some- 
thing singular  to  us,  though  ordinary  in  her  own  country.  She  had  on  her  seal  of 
arms,  while  unmarried,  a  lozenge  shield,  parted  per  pale ;  on  the  left  half  the  arms 
of  her  father,  for  her  own  ;  and  the  right  side  was  blank,  (without  arms  for  a  hus- 
band) called  arms  of  expectation  ;  which,  it  seems,  was  then  a  custom  in  Spain  for 
young  ladies  that  were  resolved  to  marry  :  which  shield  of  Isabel,  Olivarins  Ure- 
dus  gives  in  his  Collections,  with  these  words :  "  In  Isabella;  insignibus  dextrum 
"  scuti  latus  vacuum,  quod  expectativum  vocant,  indicat  Isabellam  adhuc  innuptam, 
"  &-  in  illo  insignia  mariti  expectantem,  sinistrum  autem  aucupant  insignia  patris 
"  ejus  Philippi  secundi."  Here  it  is  to  be  observed  that  the  wife  gives  always  the 
right  hand  in  the  shield  to  the  husband,  though  she  does  not  know  what  quality  he 
may  be  of. 

When  one  marries  an  heiress,  he  may  either  impale  or  quarter  her  paternal  coat 
with  his  own,  or  place  her  arms,  by  way  of  an  escutcheon,  over  his  own  arms;  as 
Sir  Thomas  Brand,  Gentleman  Usher  of  the  Green  Rod  of  the  most  ancient  Order 
of  the  Thistle,  places  in  the  centre  of  his  quartered  coat  an  escutcheon  of  his  v^jife's 
arms,  gironni  of  eight,  ermine  and  gules,  within  a  bordure  ingrailed  of  the  last,  for 
Campbell  of  Lundie,  whose  daughter,  (it  seems  an  heiress)  he  married.  For  which 
see  Plate  XXII.  in  the  First  Part  of  this  System. 

It  is  a  frequent  custom  with  the  English  of  late  to  place  the  arms  of  the  wife, 
heiress  or  not  heiress,  in  an  inescutcheon,  in  the  centre  of  the  husband's  arms 
which  they  call  an  escutcheon  of  pretence,  because  he  pretendeth  right  to  that  coat 
upon  marrying  an  heiress:  As  Guillim  says,  in  his  Display  of  Heraldry,  where  he 


36  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ^c. 

gives  several  examples,  to  which  I  refer  the  reader:  But  how  to  call  that  on  the 
husband's  coat,  who  has  not  married  an  heiress,  I  know  not. 

When  a  husband  has  had  two  wives,  heiresses  or  not  heiresses,  and  would  have 
their  arms  marshalled  with  his  own,  the  husband's  shield  may  be  then  tierced  in 
pale,  i,  e.  divided  into  three  equal  parts  perpendicularly;  the  husband's  arms  placed 
in  the  middle  area,  and  the  wives'  two  coats  on  the  right  and  left  areas :  Or  they 
may  be  otherwise  disposed  thus,  parti  mi-covpe  to  the  sinister,  i.  e.  the  shield  being 
divided  in  two  equal  halfs  by  a  paler  line,  the  husband's  arms  on  the  right  side, 
and  the  left  side  divided  by  a  horizontal  line ;  above  and  below  are  placed  the 
arms  of  the  two  wives,  as  frequently  practised  v/ith  us  upon  funeral  escutcheons; 
of  which  partitions  I  have  treated  in  the  7th  chapter  of  the  First  Part  of  this  Sys- 
tem, and  illustrated  by  examples  in  my  Essay  on  the  Ancient  and  Modern  Use  of 
Armories. 

When  a  wife  would  have  the  arms  of  her  two  husbands  represented  in  one  shield 
with  her  own,  then  it  is  divided  thus,  parti  ini-coupe  to  the  dexter;  of  which  I 
have  given  examples  in  my  last  mentioned  book. 

Mr  Kent,  in  his  Grammar  of  Heraldry,  says,  if  a  man  do  marry  three  wives,  the 
first  two  shall  have  the  chief  part,  and  the  third  all  the  base:  So  the  husband's 
arms  is  in  the  middle,  or  fesse  part;  and  if  he  have  a  fourth  wife,  she  must,  says 
he,  participate  of  the  base  with  the  third  wife :  And  Guillim,  in  his  Display  of 
Heraldry,  gives  us  an  example  of  the  arms  of  a  gentleman  of  the  nameof  CLiFroN, 
impaled  in  the  middle  with  the  arms  of  his  seven  wives;  four  on  the  dexter  side, 
and  three  on  the  sinister,  all  bar-ways,  that  is  to  say,  the  shield  is  tierced,  i.  e. 
divided  into  three  equal  parts  perpendicular,  the  first  part  on  the  right  is  coupi 
three,  which  make  four  areas,  where  the  first  four  wives'  arms  are  placed  one  above 
another ;  in  the  second  part,  which  is  the  middle,  are  only  the  arms  of  Chfton 
the  husband ;  the  third  part,  on  the  left  hand,  is  coupe  two,  which  makes  three 
areas,  in  which  are  his  other  three  wives'  arms,  one  above  another ;  for  which  see 
our  author.  And  these  are  the  ways  of  marshaUing  many  wives  and  husband  to- 
gether. 

Besides  impaling  by  way  of  haron  and  femme,  the  husband,  by  a  frequent  cus- 
tom with  us,  quarters  the  wife's  coat  with  his  own,  upon  the  account  that  she  is 
an  heiress;  i.  e.  by  dividing  of  the  shield  into  four  equal  parts,  which  makes  four 
areas :  In  the  first  and  fourth  are  the  husband's  arms,  in  the  second  and  third  are 
the  wife's.  But  this  custom  is  not  so  frequent  in  other  countries  as  with  us  of  late: 
For  the  husband,  in  that  condition,  properly  placed  his  wife's  arms  by  way  of  sur- 
tout  over  his  own,  that  is,  an  inescutcheon  in  the  centre  of  his  own,  which  I  have 
said  above,  to  be  an  escutcheon  of  pretence  ;  because  he  pretendeth  to  bear  the 
arms  of  his  wife,  and  his  right  to  her  inheritance,  which  his  issue  should  enjoy, 
and  that  their  successors  may  freely  quarter  their  paternal  and  maternal  coats  to- 
gether. As  for  the  custom  of  the  husband  quartering  his  wife's  arms  with  his 
owm,  I  shall  add  the  instance  of  the  Right  Honourable  William  Johnston  Marquis 
of  Annandale,  Earl  of  Hartfield,  and  Lord  Johnston,  chief  pf  his  name,  who  car- 
ried argent,  a  saltier  sable,  on  a  chief  gules,  three  cushions  ur:  But  upon  his  mar- 
riage with  the  heiress  of  Craigiehall  of  the  name  of  Fairholme,  he  quartered  her 
arms  with  his  own,  being  or,  an  anchor  in  pale  gules:  And  the  same  is  still  carried 
by  their  son  and  heir,  the  present  Marquis  of  Annandale. 

Sir  James  Dalrymple,  President  of  the  Session,  and  afterwards  advanced  to  the 
dignity  of  Viscount  of  Stair,  quartered  the  coat  of  his  lady  with  his  own,  who  was 
Margaret,  eldest  daughter  and  co-heir  of  James  Ross  of  Balnall  and  Carsecreuch, 
near  Glenluce  in  Galloway,  (as  in  our  New  Register  of  Arms)  carried,  quarterly, 
first  or,  on  a  saltier  azure,  nine  lozenges  of  the  first;  second  or,  a  cheveron  cheque, 
sable  and  argent,  between  three  water-budgets  of  the  second,  for  Ross;  third  as  the 
second,  and  fourth  as  the  first. 

Their  eldest  son,  Sir  John  Dalrymple  Earl  of  Stair,  married  Elizabeth  Dun- 
das,  heiress  of  Newliston,  and  placed  her  arms,  argent,  a  lion  rampant  gules,  on 
an  inescutcheon  over  his  .^atiiei's  quartered  arms,  as  above.  He  was  created  Earl 
of  Stair,  Viscount  of  Dalrymple,  and  Lord  Newliston,  omio  1703.  His  son  again, 
the  present  Earl,  marshalls  his  mother's  coat  with  these  of  his  grandfather  and 
grandmother. 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  iJc. 


h  is  to  be  observed,  that  when  a  gentleman  marries  a  gentlewoman,  whose  fa- 
ther did  bear  any  marks  of  cadency  in  his  coat,  the  same  ought  to  be  continued  in 
the  impalement  and  quartering  of  the  daughter's  arms  with  her  husband's,  w  hich 
is  just  and  reasonable:  For,  by  the  mark  of  cadency  of  her  father,  she  will  be 
known  from  what  branch  of  the  stem  of  the  principal  house  she  is  come  of.  I 
have  shown  before,  when  a  coat  of  arms,  surrounded  with  a  bordure,  is  marshalled 
pale-ways  with  another,  then  that  part  of  the  bordure  which  is  next  to  the  other 
coat  impaled  with  it,  must  be  exempted,  and  not  seen.  Again,  it  is  to  be  ob- 
served, if  a  bordured  coat  be  marshalled  with  other  coats  quarterly,  then  shall  no 
part  of  the  bordure  be  omitted,  but  the  bordure  shall  environ  the  same  round. 
Having  treated,  I  think,  sufficiently  of  the  several  ways  of  marshalling  husband's 
and  wife's  arms,  I  shall  now  proceed  to  treat  of  the  method  of  marshalling  arms  of 
offices. 


MARSHALLING  ARMS  UPON  THE  ACCOUNT  OF  OFFICES  AND  EMPLOYMENTS'. 

Amongst  the  several  causes  and  occasions  of  assuming  arms,  lawyers,  and  writers 
on  the  science  of  armories,  give  offices  for  one,  as  well   used  by  ecclesiastics  as 

laics. 

I  gave  out  before,  page  20.  that  the  Romish  churchmen  are  not  obliged  to 
bruise  their  paternal  arms  with  marks  of  cadency,  although  younger  sons,  or  de- 
scendants of  such,  because  they  are  not  allowed  to  marry,  and  so  have  no  lawful 
succession:  And  some  lawyers  of  this  opinion  tell  us,  that  the  end  and  design  of 
marks  of  cadency,  to  bruise  the  principal  bearing;  was  to  difference  the  descendants 
of  younger  sons;  so  that  there  is  no  need  of  brisures  in  the  arms  of  ecclesiastics, 
since  they  can  have  no  issue.  Secondly,  They  say,  that  churchmen  have  no  need 
of  additional  figures  to  bruise  their  paternal  bearings;  for  their  arms  are  suffi- 
ciently distinguished  from  the  laics,  being  only  adorned  with  cherubims,  or  angels, 
and  not  timbred  with  a  military  dress,  which  are  marks  of  greatness  and  pride, 
such  as  the  helmet,  mantlings,  wreaths,  and  crests. 

But  more  rightly  others  reason  with  Scohier,  in  his  Compartment  of  Arms,  cap. 
17.  "'That  differences  or  brisures  were  not  invented  by  law  and  custom  to  dis- 
"  tinguish  the  descendants  of  younger  brothers,  but  to  difference  brothers  them- 
"  selves."  The  words  of  our  author,  with  these  of  yurispriidentia  Heroica,  in  an- 
swer to  the  former  two  reasons,  are,  "  Nee  obstat  prima,  nee  secunda  ratio,  quan- 
"  doquidem  discerni  colorum  usus  non  solum  sit  inventus,  ad  ipsos  descendentes 
"  ex  diversis  fratribus  dignoscendos,  verum  etiam  ad  ipsos  inter  se  discernendos." 
Neither  can  churchmen  be  said  to  be  the  end  of  the  family;  because,  by  the 
Pope's  dispensation,  they  may  marry,  whose  issue  may  begin  and  continue  their 
family;  so  that  they  must  have  differencing  figures  added  to  the  principal  or 
plain  arms  of  the  principal  family,  which  only  belong  to  the  primogeniture.  And 
as  for  the  other  reason,  that  ecclesiastics  are  sufficiently  distinguished  from  the 
laics,  in  not  having  their  arms  timbred  with  helmet,  volets,  and  crests;  yet  when 
they  fall  into  noble  feus  and  jurisdictions  they  then  timbre  their  shields,  as  was 
found  in  the  Council  of  Brabant;  as  our  author,  "  Nee  obstet  alia  ratio,  quia  illud 
"  discerniculum,  non  ipsa  arma  aut  insignia,  sed  exteriora  ornamenta  afficit,  quan- 
"  qu^ni  etiam  ab  ecclesiasticis,  prsesertim  nobilibus,  &•  jurisdictione  aliqua  imbutis, 
"  thymbrum  militarem  fastum  aJhiberi  vidimus.  Et  banc  opinionein  nuper  sum- 
"  mum  Brabantias  concilium  amplexum  est."  When  a  churchman  marshals  the 
arms  of  a  dignified  feu,  or  these  of  his  office,  I  mean  those  of  the  church,  with  his 
paternal  arms,  he  needs  no  other  brisure:  And  this  is  the  general  practice  in  Eu- 
rope, of  which  I  proceed  to  give  some  examples. 

Cardinals,  bishops,  abbots,  priors,  and  other  church  officers,  in  imitation  of  the 
laics,  when  marshaUing  was  in  use,  began  to  take  some  remarkable  figures  of 
their  offices,  and  to  compose  or  marshal  them  with  their  paternal  arms,  after 
the  order  or  method  now  in  use,  parti,  coupe,  and  quarterly:  Of  which  I  shall  add 
a  few  instances  of  the  practice  of  prelates  abroad,  and  then  return  to  those  in 
Britain. 

Vol.  IL  K 


33  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  We. 

The  Jirst  way  mentioned,  parti,  which  the  English  call  parted  per  pale,  is  by 
impalement,  as  before,  of  husband  and  wife's  arms ;  but  with  this  difference,  tlie 
arms  of  office  are  placed  on  the  right  side  of  the  shield  partly  with  the  paternal 
arms  of  those  in  office.  And  though  a  bishop,  or  any  other  prelate,  be  called 
maritus  ecclesiie,  the  husband  of  the  church,  by  the  canon  law,  yet  he  is  but  one, 
in  a  figurative  speech;  and  the  church's  arms  take  place  as  the  more  noble,  as  also 
do  those  of  secular  offices. 

The  second  method  of  prelates  marshalling  their  ^rms  by  way  of  eoupe,  that  is, 
/)rtrterf  ^fr  y^w^",  by  dividing  the  shield  into  two  equal  parts  horizontally,  is  by 
placing  the  coat  of  the  office  above,  and  that  of  the  incumbent  below;  a  frequent 
practice  in  Italy. 

The  third  method  by  quartering,  is  done  by  a  palar,  and  horizontal  line  divid- 
ing the  shield  into  four  quarters;  which  way  is  frequently  used  by  the  French 
and  Germans;  especially  when  those  high  churchmen  are  temporal  princes,  as 
the  ecclesiastic  peers  of  France.  The  Archbishop  and  Duke  of  Rheims,  for  his. 
office,  carries  azure,  seme  flower-de-luces  or,  a  cross  gules.  The  Bishop  and  Duke 
of  Langres,  axure,  seme  flower-de-luces  or,  a  saltier  gules.  The  Bishop  of  Laon, 
seme  oi  France,  a  crosier  in  pale  gules.  The  Bishop  Count  of  Bbauvais,  or,  a 
cross  gules,  cantoned  with  four  keys  of  the  last.  Which  arms  of  offices  are  placed 
in  the  first  and  fourth  quarters,  with  the  paternal  ones  of  those  in  office. 

The  three  Archbishops,  Electors  of  the  Empire,  do  also  marshal  their  arms  of 
offices  with  their  paternal  ones,  which  are  sometimes  placed  by  way  of  surtout, 
apon  the  account  of  many  coats  of  offices,  which  they  marshal  together. 

The  Archbishop  and  Elector  of  Mayence,  or  Mentz,  Great  Chancellor  of  the 
Empire  in  Germany,  carries,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  gules,  a  wheel  with  white 
spokes  or,  for  his  Episcopal  See ;  second  and  third,  the  paternal  arms  of  the  bishop 
in  possession.  The  wheel  is  storied  to  have  been  at  first  assumed  by  one  Willigis, 
who  was  chosen  archbishop  for  his  eminent  piety;  and  he,  out  of  humility,  be- 
ing the  son  of  a  wheelwright,  took  the  wheel,  which  his  successors  have  con- 
tinued for  the  arms  of  that  See.  This  Willigis  (says  Hoppingius  de  Jure  Insignium) 
to  shov/  his  humility,  caused  paint  on  all  the  rooms  of  his  house  the  wheel  of  a 
waggon,  with  this  pentameter,  "  WiUigis  recolas,  quis  es,  S^  unde  venis,"  i.  e. 
Willigis,  consider  what  you  are,  and  whence  you  came.  "  Hsc  rota  postea, 
"  insigne  successorum  in  hoc  archiepiscopatu  permansit,  confirmante  illud  Henrico 
"  imperatore." 

The  Archbishops  of  Treves,  Great  Chancellors  of  the  Empire  in  France,  and 
Electors,  have  been  in  use  to  carry  four  coats  of  offices,  thus,  (as  by  Jacob  Imhoff) 
quarterly,  first  argent,  a  cross  gules,  for  the  Arch-See  of  Treves;  second  gules,  a 
paschal  lamb,  proper,  standing  upon  a  mount  in  base  vert,  carrying  a  flag  over  its 
shoulder,  as  abbot  of  Pruym;  third  gules,  a  castle  argent,  masoned  sable,  sur- 
mounted of  a  crosier  in  pale,  and  below,  a  crown  or,  as  prepositor  and  overseer  of 
Weissenburg;  i'ourth  azure,  a  cross  argent,  as  Bishop  of  Spires;  and  over  ail,  by 
way  of  surtout,  an  escutcheon  of  the  paternal  arms  of  the  archbishop  for  the 
time 

But  to  come  home  to  Britain  with  some  observes  of  the  ancient  and  modern 
practice  of  our  prelates  in  Scotland,  in  carrying  of  their  arms  on  their  seals  of 
office,  and  on  other  places,  I  observe,  of  old,  they  neither  did  compose,  impale, 
nor  quarter  their  ensigns  of  office  with  their  paternal  ones  till  after  the  Reforma- 
tion from  the  church  of  Rome;  for  before,  their  seals  of  arms  were  formed  after 
the  fashion  of  oblong  ovals,  upon  which  are  only  to  be  seen  the  frontispieces  of 
churches,  with  the  image  of  their  patron-saints  standing  in  the  porches,  or  in  fine 
carved  niches;  and  below  them  small  triangular  shields,  with  the  incumbent  pre- 
late's arms,  sometimes  adorned  with  mitre,  crosier,  or  cross-staff:  Of  which  I  shall 
here  add  some  instances. 

I  have  seen  several  seals  of  the  archbishops  of  St  Andrews,  which  have  the 
image  of  St  Andrew  with  his  cross,  standing  in  the  porch  of  a  church,  and  below 
his  feet  a  little  shield,  with  the  paternal  arms  of  the  archbishop  thereon ;  as 
especially  that  of  William,  Archbishop  of  that  See,  in  the  reign  of  Robert  tlie 
Bruce,  who  has  on  his  shield  three  cinquefoils,  or  frasiers,  being  of  the  name  of 
Fraser,  and  the  shield  timbred  with  a  mitre  below  the  feet  of  St  Andrew. 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS.  isc. 


39 


I  have  seen  the  seal  of  John  Bishop  of  Glasgow,  which  had  upon  it  the  image  of 
St  Mungo  standing  in  the  portico  of  the  church,  and  below  liis  feet  the  shield  of 
arms  of  that  prelate,  charged  with,  three  bars,  to  show  he  was  of  tlic  name  of  Ca- 
meron, timbred  with  a  mitre;  and  at  the  sides  of  the  shield  were  two  salmons 
with  rings  in  their  mouths,  and  on  the  legend  round  the  seal,  Sigilhwi  Joannis 
Episcopi  Glasgiien.  Which  seal  is  appended  to  an  indenture  or  agreement  betwixt 
Jean  Dowager  Queen  of  Scotland,  inother  of  King  James  II.  and  Sir  Alexander 
Livingston  of  Calder,  a'nent  the  delivery  of  the  young  king's  person:  which  in- 
denture 1  have  mentioned  before  with  the  queen's  seal. 

The  seal  of  John  Bishop  of  Ross  had  on  it  the  figure  of  a.  bishop,  with  a  mitre 
on  his  head,  standing  in  a  portico  of  a  church;  and,  at  his  feet,  a  shiekl  ciiarged 
with  a  bull's  head  cabossed,  being  the  paternal  figure  of  the  name  of  Turnbull. 
Besides  these,  I  have  seen  several  other  bishops'  seals  after  the  same  form,  witii 
their  shields  of  arms  below  images  of  saints,  or  mitred  bishops,  supported  by  angels, 
and  adorned  with  mitres  and  crosiers. 

Andrf.w,  Commendator  of  Jedburgh,  upon  his  seal  appended  to  several  evident?, 
which  I  have  seen,  had  the  image  of  a  saint  standing  in  a  fine  carved  nich ;  at 
the  foot  of  which  is  his  shield  of  arms,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  a  lion  rampant, 
second  and  third  three  papingoes,  he  being  of  the  name  of  Home;  and  behind  the 
shield,  a  crosier  turned  to  the  right. 

Upon  the  buildings  of  several  churches,  we  find  the  paternal  arms  of  bishops 
and  abbots  only  adorned  with  mitres  and  crosiers;  as  these  of  Gavin  Dunbar 
Archbishop  of  Glasgow,  having  only  three  cushions  within  a  double  tressure 
countev-iiowered,  adorned  with  a  mitre,,  for  the  name  of  Dunbar,  descended  of 
Dunbar  of  Westfield. 

On  the  wall  that  surrounds  the  castle  of  Glasgow,  on  several  places  there,  as  I 
am  informed,  are  the  arms  of  James  Beaton,  the  last  Romish  Bishop  of  that  Sec, 
being  these  of  Beaton  quartered  with  Balfour,  as  a  nephew  of  Beaton  of  Balfour; 
and  below  these  arras  is  a  salmon,  with  a  ring  in  his  mouth,  which  some  of  his 
predecessors  carried  also,  to  perpetuate  a  miracle  said  to  be  performed  by  St 
Mungo,  patron  saint  of  the  church  of  Glasgow. 

Upon  the  beautiful  abbey  of  Paisley,  as  I  am  informed,  are  the  arms  of  the 
Abbot  George  Shaw,  a  brother  of  Shaw  of  Sauchie,  carrying  his  arms,  three 
covered  cups;  and,  to  show  his  ecclesiastical  dignity,  a  crosier  behind  the  shields. 

On  the  abbacy  of  Holyroodhouse  are  to  be  seen  the  arms  of  Archibald  Craw- 
FURD,  treasurer  to  King  James  III.  He  was  a  brother  of  Crawfurd  of  Henning, 
where  are  only  his  paternal  bearing,  viz.  a  fesse  ermine,  with  a  star  in  chief,  and 
the  shield  adorned  on  the  top  with  a  mitre. 

I  find  none  of  our  Romish  prelates  ever  marshalled  the  figures  of  their  respective 
sees  (I  mean  the  images  of  their  patron  saints,  their  crosses,  crosiers,  mitres,  or  such 
remarkable  things  belonging  to  them)  with  their  paternal  bearings,  by  impaling  or 
quartering  of  them  in  one  shield,  though  they  have  adorned  the  outer  sides  of  their 
shields  with  such  figures.  And  I  am  of  opinion  that  the  custom  with  us  of  mar- 
shalling arms  of  episcopal  sees,  and  other  ecclesiastical  offices,  with  the  paternal 
arms  of  the  incumbents,  is  not  much  older  than  the  Reformation  from  the  Romish 
Ghcrch  ;  and  the  figures  of  which  they  are  now  formed  and  made  up  of  are  taken 
from  the  old  seals ;-  such  as  the  images  of  saints  and  bishops,  their  crosses,  mitres, 
crosiers,  pastoral  staffs,  and  other  such  things,  which  will  appear  to  the  curious  by 
their  blazons  :  a  few  of  which  I  shall  here  give. 

The  arms  now  used  for  the  Archiepiscopal  See  of  St  Andrews,  azure,  a  St 
Andrew's  Cross  (/.  e.  a  saltier)  wgent,  taken  from  the  old  seal  of  that  See,  before 
described,  which  have  been  impaled  with  the  arms  of  those  that  have  been  in 
office. 

The  Archiepiscopal  See  of  the  Church  of  Glasgow  has  for  arms,  argent,  a  tree 
growing  out  of  a  mount  vert,  with  a  bell  hanging  on  a  branch,  and  a  salmon  lying  , 
fesse-ways  thwart  the  trunk  of  the  tree,  with  a  ring  in  its  mouth,  proper.  The 
salmon,  as  I  observed  before,  was  carried  by  the  Romish  prelates,  at  the  sides,  and 
below  their  shield  of  arms.  Alexander  Cairncross,  by  divine  providence.  Arch- 
bishop of  Glasgow,  had  on  his  seal  of  office  the  above  blazon,  impaled  on  the  right. 


40  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ^c. 

with  his  paternal  coat  on  the  left,  viz.  argent,  a  stag's  head  erased  with  a  cross 
patee  fitehe,  between  his  attire,  gules. 

The  BisHOPRicK  of  Galloway  has  for  arms,  the  image  of  St  Ninian,  holding  in 
his  right  hand  a  cross. 

The  BisHOPRicK  of  Dumblane,  a  saltier  ingrailed. 

The  BisHopRiCK.  of  Argyle,  azure,  two  crosiers  in  saltier  adosse,  and  in  chief  a 
mitre  or. 

The  arms  of  the  Bishoprick  of  Ross  are  two  men,  the  one  on  the  right  hand, 
representing  St  Boniface  in  a  white  habit,  his  hands  lying  cross  on  his  breast ;  the 
other  a  bishop,  pointing  to  St  Boniface  with  his  right  hand,  and  by  his  left  holding 
a  crosier  or,  with  a  mitre  on  his  head. 

The  arms  of  these  bishopricks  are  impaled  with  the  arms  of  those  who  have  pos- 
sessed these  offices. 

The  Bishoprick  of  Edinburgh  was  erected  out  of  the  Bishoprick  of  St  Andrews 
by  King  Charles  L  anno  1633;  so  that  that  See  has  almost  the  same  arms  with 
St  Andrews,  and  in  chief  a  mitre  or ;  which  were  impaled  with  the  arms  of  the 
incumbents. 

I  shall  add  no  more  of  them  here  to  incumber  my  reader,  but  proceed  to  a  few 
such  bearings  of  those  in  England. 

The  Archiepiscopal  See  of  Canterbury  has,  azure,  a  pastoral  staff  in  pale 
argent,  topped  with  a  cross  patee  or,  and  surmounted  of  an  episcopal  pall,  (/.  e.  an- 
episcopal  ornament,  and  not  an  armorial  pale),  of  the  second,  edged  and  fringed  of 
the  third,  charged  with  four  crosses  fitched  sable. 

The  Archiepiscopal  See  of  York,  gules,  two  keys  adosse  argent ;  and  in  chief 
an  imperial  crown  or. 

The  Bishoprick  of  London,  gules,  two  swords  in  saltier,  points  upward,  proper, 
iked  and  pommelled  or. 

The  Episcopal  See  of  Worcester,  ten  torteauxes  sable,  4,  3,  2,  and  i. 

Carlisle,  argent  on  a  cross  sable,  a  mitre  with  labels  or. 

The  Episcopal  See  of  St  Asaph,  sable,  a  key  in  bend  sinister,  and  a  crosier  in 
bend  dexter  argent. 

The  See  of  Salisbury,  azure,  the  Virgin  Mary  (being  dedicate  to  her)  crowned, 
holding  the  holy  babe  in  her  right  arm,  and  a  sceptre  with  her  left  hand,  all 
gold. 

All  which  ensigns  are  impaled  on  the  right  side  of  the  shields,  with  the  paternal 
arms  of  those  in  office  on  the  left  side.  For  more  ecclesiastical  arms  the  reader 
may  see  the  British  Compendium  of  Arms  lately  published  in  taille  douce. 

As  for  these  orders  of  knighthood,  which  are  both  spiritual  and  temporal,  such 
as  the  Knights  Templars  and  Hospitallers,  and  others  of  such  institution,  they  com- 
pose, impale,  or  quarter  the  arms  of  their  respective  orders  with  their  paternal  ones  ; 
as  do  at  present  the  Grand  Masters  of  the  Knights  of  Malta  ;  who  quarter,  in  the 
first  place,  the  arms  of  that  order,  being  gules,  a  cross  argent,  with  their  proper 
arms  :  but  the  rest  of  the  knights  of  that  order,  in  distinction  from  the  Grand 
Master,  do  not  quarter  but  compose  them  with  their  own,  by  placing  them  in 
chief,  or  on  a  chief,  which  has  occasioned  one  coat  of  arms  to  have  two  chiefs,  the 
one  above  the  other.  So  much  then  for  ecclesiastical  arms.  I  shall  now  proceed 
to  the  arms  of  secular  offices  ;  some  of  which  I  shall  here  mention. 

Seculars,  who  enjoy  high  offices,  military  or  civil,  sometimes  impale  or  quarter 
the  arms  of  their  offices  with  their  own.  The  electoral  princes  of  the  empire 
quarter  in  their  shields  of  arms,  the  arms  or  badges  of  their  offices,  being  the 
figures  of  the  regalia  they  carry  before  the  emperor,  by  virtue  of  their  high  posts, 
as  Beckmannus  says,  dissert,  cap.  5.  "  In  insignibus  suis  seculares  clinodium  istud 
"  inserunt,  cui  ratione  officii  portando  destinati  sunt." 

The  King  of  Bohemia,  as  principal  cup-bearer  to  the  Emperor,  charged  the 
breast  of  his  lion  with  a  cup. 

The  Duke  of  Saxony,  as  one  of  the  electors  of  the  empire,  carried  over  his  a- 
chievement  of  many  quarters,  by  way  of  surtout,  an  escutcheon  parted  per  fesse, 
argent  and  sable,  two  swords  in  saltier  gides,  hiked  and  pommelled  or,  as  Elector 
Marischal  of  the  empire. 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  l^c.  -  41 

The  Duke  of  Bavaria  and  Palatine  carries  three  shields  tied  together,  the  first 
on  the  right  side,  sable,  a  hon  rampant  or,  armed  and  kmgued  ^ules  contourne, 
(/.  e.  looking  to  the  other's  shield  on  the  left)tbr  the  Palatinate ;  the  second  shield, 
fusile  in  bend,  urgent  and  azure,  of  twenty-one  pieces,  for  Bavaria;  the  third  shield, 
below  the  above  two,  gules,  charged  with  the  imperial  mend  or,  which  he  carries 
in  solemnity  before  the  emperor. 

The  Eleccor  Paxatine  of  the  Rhine  carries  parted  per  pale,  first  the  Palatinate, 
second  Bavaria,  and  in  base  a  point  gules,  as  third  Elector.  See  book  Jcu  D' Ar- 
mories des  Sovereigns. 

The  Duke  and  Marquis  of  Brandenburg,  (now  King  of  Prussia)  as  Elector,  car- 
ries over  his  achievement  of  many  quarters,  by  way  of  surtout,  azure,  a  sceptre 
pale-ways  or. 

The  Duke  of  Brunswick.,  (now  King  of  Great  Britain)  as  Elector  of  the  Empire, 
carries  over  tlie  fourth  quarter  of  his  majesty's  arms,  an  inescutcheon,  Charlemagne's 
crown ;  of  whose  imperial  achievement  afterwards. 

Other  nobles  in  the  empire,  upon  account  of  their  employments  or  offices, 
carried  figures  to  represent  them;  as  the  Earls  of  Oldenburg,  principal  architects 
in  the  empire,  carried  in  one  of  the  quarters  of  their  arms  two  beams  of  wood, 
blazoned  bars.  The  Eails  of  Spigelberg,  as  master-hunters,  carry  a  hart,  proper. 
And  the  Earls  of  Wernegeroda,  as  master-fishers,  carry  in  their  achievement  a 
fish;  as 'Ko'^^mgwxs  ile  Jure  Insignium:  so  that  offices  and  employments  are  not 
only  the  causes  of  obtauiing  arms  at  first,  but  also  of  multiplying  several  arms  in 
one  shield  ;  which  was  a  practice  with  the  Romans,  Germans,  French,  English,  &-C. 
In  France  those  who  had  offices  of  the  crown,  of  old,  under  the  first,  second,  and 
third  races  of  the  Kings  of  France,  not  only  took  their  names  from  their  offices, 
but  their  arms,  as  Hoppingius  cie  jure  Insignuan,  cap.  4.  "  In  Gallia,  omnes  offi- 
"  ciales  corona;  Francis  sub  regibus,  imse,  zdx  &-  jtice  generationis,  non  assume- 
"  bant  aliunde  cognomina  &  insignia,  quam  ab  offigio  quod  gerebant ;  cujus  me- 
"  moriaii  suis  liberis  &-  de'.cendentibus  reliquerunt,  qui  eadem  insignia  &-  cogno- 
"  mina  retinebant."  And,  for  example,  he  gives  the  family  of  Mussini,  who,  of 
old,  were  Earls  of  Senlis,  and  chief  butlers  of  France,  for  which  they  carried,  to 
perpetuate  their  office,  a  shield  quarterly,  or  and  gules;  the  first  to  represent  the 
king's  gold  cup,  and  the  second  the  wine;  so  that  the  family  had  the  name  of 
Butlers  of  Senlis.  To  please  some  curious,  I  shall  add  our  author's  words,  "  In 
"  cujus  rei  memoriam  (Pincernas)  portaverunt  pro  insignibus  clypeum  divisum  in 
"  quadras,  ex  auro  &•  colore  rubro,  quod  representabat  poculum  St  cantherium 
"  regis,  &  colore  rubro,  vinum  hacque  de  causa  appeUati  sunt  Pincerns  Silvanec- 
"  tini,  i.  e.  Baateliers  de  Senlis." 

In  England,  another  ancient  family  descended  of  Argentius,  and  Brionini  a 
Norman,  became  chief  butlers  in  the  reign  of  William  II.  of  England,  and  took  for 
arms,  gules,  three  cups  or,  to  show  their  office,  and  introduced  it  as  a  surname  to 
their  posterity.  The  words  of  our  author  are,  "  Hi,  a  Davido  Argentinio  Nor- 
"  mano  viro  militari,  qui  sub  Gulielmo  Secundo  meruit,  &-  nomen  &  stemma  duxe- 
"  runt;  &-' in  huj us  rei  testimonium  tribus  scyphis  argenteis  in  rubro  clypeo  usi 
"  sunt:"  A\'hich  coat  of  office  is  quartered  with  their  paternal  coat,  viz.  or,  a  chief 
indented  azure.  From  this  noble  stock  of  worthies,  in  a  direct  line,  was  descend- 
ed J.\]MES  Butler  Marquis  of  Ormond,  and  Earl  of  Ossory  in  Ireland,  of  which  he 
was  Lord  Lieutenant,  and  by  King  Charles  II.  created  a  peer  of  England,  by  the 
titls  of  Lord  Butler  of  Lanthony,  and  Earl  of  Brecknock,  and  the  13th  year  of 
that  king's  reign,  Duke  of  Ormond  in  Ireland,  and  also  a  Knight  of  the  Garter: 
He  married  the  Lady  Elizabetli  Preston,  daughter  to  Richard  Lord  Dingwall  in 
Scotland,  and  Earl  of  Desmond  in  Ireland,  by  whom  he  had  three  sons,  Thomas 
Earl  of  Ossory,  Richard  Earl  of  Arran,  and  John.  Richard  died  without  issue, 
Thomas  was  summoned  to  the  English  Parliament  by  the  title  of  Lord  Butler  of 
Moorpark,  and  was  also  a  Knight  of  the  Garter,  and  Rear- Admiral  of  his  Majesty's 
Fleet :  He  married  Lady  Amelia  Nassau,  daughter  to  Lewis  de  Nassau,  son  to 
Maurice  Prince  of  Orange,  and  Count  of  Nassau;  by  whom  he  had  issue  three  sons, 
James  Duke  of  Ormond  in  England,  Charles  Earl  of  Arran,  created  Lord  Butler  of 
Weston  in  England,  who  carries  the  above  quartered  arms,  with  a  crescent  for  dif- 
ference ;  and  another,  James,  who  died  young. 

Vol.  U.  L 


42 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ^c. 


Carnegie  Earl  of  Southesk,  whose  arms  are  or,  an  eagle  displayed  azure,  beak- 
ed, raembred,  and  armed  y///w;  his  predecessors,  Carnegie  of  K.innaird,  were  cup- 
bearers to  our  kings,  for  v/hich,  of  old,  they  carried  a  gold  cup  on  the  breast  of 
their  eagle,  to  show  their  office. 

Many  civil  and  politic  offices,  which  have  symbols  and  badges,  are  not  placed 
within  the  shield  of  arms  of  those  in  office,  as  those  above  mentioned,  but  at  the 
back,  sides,  or  foot  of  the  shield ;  such  as  the  marischal's  battons,  the  constable's 
swords,  the  admiral's  anchors,  the  master-household's  battons,  the  chamberlain's 
keys,  &c.     Of  which  more  fully  in  the  Treatise  of  Exterior  Ornaments. 

To  put  an  end  to  this  section,  I  shall  mention  here  the  arms  of  the  Herald 
Offices  111  Scotland  and  England.  Those  of  Scotland  are  now  argent,  a  lion  seiant, 
full-faced  gules,  (being  the  crest  of  the  royal  achievement  of  Scotland)  holding  in 
his  dexter  paw  a  thistle  slipped  vert;  in  the  sinister,  an  escutcheon  of  the  second, 
and  on  a  chief  azure  a  St  Andrew's  cross  of  the  first.  Which  arms  are  impaled  on 
the  right  side  with  the  paternal  bearing  of  Sir  Alexander  Erskine  of  Cambo,  the 
present  Lyon  King  at  Arms,  being  these  of  the  Earl  of  Marr,  with  a  crescent  for 
difference,  as  a  cadet  of  the  family.  This  seal  of  office  is  no  older  than  himself; 
for  his  father,  Sir  Charles,  also  Lyon  King  at  Arms,  had  on  his  seal  appended  to 
patents  of  arms  given  out  by  him,  only  his  paternal  arms;  and  any  particular  seal  or 
badge  our  principal  heralds  had  before,  was  the  sovereign  achievement  of  the 
kingdom,  (called  by  other  nations  I'esmail)  which  was  hung  by  a  chain  of  gold 
about  the  neck  of  the  principal  herald,  and  on  the  breast  of  his  brethren  heralds 
and  pursuivants,  by  a  ribbon,  as  their  cognizance  and  badge  :  And  the  same,  as  I 
read,  was  practised  by  the  heralds  in  England. 

The  principal  heralds  in  England,  in  the  reign  of  Qiieen  Elizabeth,  and  especially 
the  Garter  King  at  Arms,  wore  a  badge  of  gold  daily,  whereon  were  enamelled 
only  the  sovereign's  arms ;  as  Ashmole,  in  his  Institution  of  the  Garter,  page  2g8, 
and  253,  and  had  no  proper  seal  for  the  office,  till  Sir  Edward  Walker,  then  Gar- 
ter King  at  Arms,  obtained  a  licence  from  the  Queen  to  distinguish  himself  from 
the  other  Kings  at  Arms,  to  impale  St  George's  arms,  viz.  argent,  a  cross  gides  on 
the  right  side,  with  those  of  the  sovereign's  on  the  left:  And  about  that  time  the 
■^eal  of  the  office  was  formed  thus,  argent,  a  cross  guJes,  and,  on  a  chief  azure,  a 
crown  imperial,  environed  with  a  garter,  buckled  and  nuved,  betwixt  a  lion  passant 
gardant,  and  a  flower-de-luce  or,  which  were  impaled  with  the  arms  of  Sir  Edward 
Walker,  as  they  were  afterwards  with  those  of  his  successors  in  that  office. 

The  heralds  in  Germany,  Flanders,  and  elsewhere,  have  the  arms  of  their  so- 
vereigns, enamelled  or  depicted  on  gold,  affixed  to  their  breasts:  But  I  take  them 
to  be  principal  and  learned  heralds,  by  royal  authority,  and  not  such,  as  with 
us,  who  know  nothing  of  the  matter.  As  Sir  John  Baptista  Chrystin,  Chan- 
cellor of  Brabant,  in  his  curious  book  entitled  Jurisprudentla  Heroica,  sive  de 
jure  Be!garum,  circa  nobUiiatem  et  indgnia,  whose  words  are  those,  in  the 
Spanish  Flanders,  from  paragraph  8.  after  he  had  given  an  account  of  those  of 
Germany  and  France,  viz.  "  Qua;libet  deinde  provincia  apud  Belgas  suum  habet 
"  fecialem,  ejus  titulo  celebrem,  qui  tesseram  sive  laminam  insignibus  ejusdem 
"  decoratam  (vulgo  I'esmail  d'office)  pectori  assutam  gerit,  &  in  festive  quovis 
"  apparatu  ejusdem  provincial  rege  armorum  tunica  indutus  (vulgo  la  cottee 
"  d'arms  du  roy)  dextra  caduceum  gestans  assistit."  But  more  of  this  afterwards, 
when  I  come  to  speak  of  the  Rise,  Nature,  and  Office  of  Heralds. 


ARMS  OF  ALLI.VNCES. 

Besides  the  arms  of  offices,  as  I  said  before,  there  are  other  causes  of  marshalling 
many  coats  of  arms  in  one  shield,  given  us  by  eminent  lawyers  and  heralds,  which 
they  call  cumuhitio,  or  multipHcatio  insigniu?n.  As  Hoppingius  de  Jure  Insignium, 
page  782,  "  De  quarteriis  sive  sectionibus,  campis  sive  areis,"  called  with  us  mar- 
shalled or  quartered  arms;  and  are  marks  of  honour  and  greatness,  esteemed  by  all 
nations  upon  many  accounts,  especially  upon  honourable  alliances,  and  succession 
to  noble  feus:  A  practice  frequent  with  the  French;  as  Hoppingius,  "  Eifectus 
"  vero  hujus  accumulationis,  sive  conjunctionis  insignium  est  augere  dignitatem ; 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  Uc.  43 

"  etenim  hie  mos  &■  usus,  maxime  receptus  est  Gallis,  quo  sciaiit  S<-  iiitelligant  his 
"  niutation;bus  jure  natura;,  regnique  legibus  non  derogari,  seJ  augmentum  esse 
"  nobilitatis." 

^  quartered  coat  of  arms  is  when  the  shield  is  divided  into  four  quarters,  or 
areas,  by  a  perpendicular  and  horizontal  line  cutting  the  centre;  and  sometimes 
again  ttiese  quarters  or  areas  are  alto  divided  into  as  many  quadras  by  the  same 
hues,  aai  are  tilled  up  with  the  arms  of  dilTerent  families  upon  several  occasions : 
by  heralds  and  lawyers  called  cumulatio  armorum,  of  old  latined  scutum  quarteria- 
tiim,  and  of  late,  scutum  quadripartitum:  But  Mr  Gibbon,  an  English  herald,  for 
quartered  arms,  says,  scutum  in  quatuor  partes,  lineis  ad  cruris  7nodum  ductis,  scctuin  ; 
after  some  old  heralds,  who  blaioned  a  quartered  s\\\e\A,  parted  per  cross. 

Heralds  who  write  m  Latin,  call  one  of  these  quarters  quarteria;  Chiflletius  and 
Uredus  make  use  of  the  word  quadraiis;  Jacob  Imhoff  the  German,  tiic  word 
quadra;  and  others  say  area,  for  a  quarter. 

Sir  John  Feme,  in  his  Glory  of  Generosity,  gives  us  three  sorts  of  quartered 
coats  of  arms;  the  first  he  calls  a  plain  quartered  coat,  the  second  a  quartered  coat, 
and  the  third  a  quarterly  quartered  coat:  'Which  1  shall  explain,  and  give  examples 
by  whom  carried  with  us,  and  other  nations. 

As  to  the  first,  a  plain  quartered  coat  is  when  the  superficies  or  field  is  divided 
into  four  quarters  or  areas;  and  when  the  first  and  fourth  quarters  contain  one 
coat  of  arms,  the  second  and  third  another:  so  that  there  are  but  two  different 
coats  of  arms  twice  repeated  in  a  quartered  shield ;  which,  says  our  author,  is  a 
suitable  disposition  of  the  arms  of  the  son  and  heir  of  a  gentleman  who  had  to 
wife  an  heiress:  the  father's  arms  are  placed  in  the  first  and  fourth  quarters,  and 
the  mother's  in  the  second  and  third. 

It  is  to  be  observed,  that  in  marshalHng  arms  with  others,  upon  the  account  of 
alliance,  and  if  both  houses  be  cadets,  their  marks  of  cadencies  must  be  continued 
upon  both  their  coats. 

Alliances  then  by  marriages  has  occasioned  the  multiplication  of  many  arms  in 
one  shield,  not  only  al.noit  by  all  the  princes  in  Europe,  but  even  by  nobles  high 
and  low,  to  show  their  noble  descent;  and  especially  by  the  issue  of  those  who 
have  married  heiresses,  to  show  the  right  they  have  to  territories  and  lands. 

I  shall  begin  with  one  of  the  ancientest  examples  of  this  kind  1  have  met  with 
in  my  reading.  Abaut  the  year  1117,  Ferdinandus,  eldest  son  of  Sanctius,  to- 
named  the  Great  King  of  Navarre,  and  Elivira,  daughter  of  Ferdinand  the  VI. 
and  last  Earl  of  Castile,  being  the  first  that  was  honoured  with  the  title  of  King  of 
Castile,  married  Sanctia,  daughter  of  Alphonsus  King  of  Leon,  sister  and  heir  of 
Beremond  who  died  without  issue. 

This  Ferdinand,  upon  account  of  his  wife  Sanctia,  got  the  kingdom  of  Leon; 
so  that  he  became  both  Kurg  of  Castile  and  Leon  about  the  year  ii6o,  and  quar- 
tered the  arms  of  those  kingdoms  thus;  first  and  fourth  ^ules,  a  castle  triple, 
towered  and  embattled  or,  masoned  sable,  for  the  kingdom  of  Castile;  second  and 
th\\-d.  argsnt,  a  lion  ra  upant  ^.v/w,  armed  or,  for  the  kingdom  of  Leon.  Tlius 
blazoned  by  Hoppingius,  "  Reges  CasteUi:^  &-  Legionis,  in  insignibus,  ferunt  scutum 
"  in  parte  superiori  dextra,  &  in  inferiori  sinistra  Castellum  aureum  in  campo 
"  rubeo ;  in  parte  superiori  sinistra  &-  inferiori  dextra,  leonem  fulvum  in  campo 
"  albo  exhibens." 

The  kingdom  of  Leon  was  a  more  ancient  kingdom  than  Castile  for  many  ages ; 
for  when  Pelagius  took  that  country  and  town  from  the  Moors,  about  the  year 
722,  it  was  always  called  a  kingdom;  and  he  took  for  his  arms  a  Hon,  because  it  is 
said  to  be  the  King  of  Beasts:  As  our  author,  "  Pelagius  Legionis  rex  primus,  circa 
"  annum  722,  eripiens  Legionem  civitatem  a  Mauris,  leonem  pro  insigniis  assumpsit, 
"  quia  leo  est,  &  interpretatur,  rex  omnium  bestiarum." 

Many  are  of  opinion,  that  the  arms  of  Leon,  being  those  of  the  ancientest  king- 
dom, should  be  placed  in  the  first  and  fourth  quarters ;  and  so  to  have  the  pre- 
cedency of  the  arms  of  Castile.  Ludovicus  Molina,  a  famous  lawyer,  defends  the 
method  of  marshalling,  as  above  blazoned,  imo.  That  the  greatest  kingdom 
should  be  preferred  to  the  ancientest.  ido,  Ferdinand  was  King  of  Castile  by 
right  of  his  father,  and  got  Leon  by  right  of  his  wife,  nomine  dotis  ;  and  that  in  his 
titles  he  was   named  first  King  of  Castile  and  Leon,  preferring  the  title  of  the  man 


44  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ^c. 

to  the  woman,  and  the  mother's  titles  ought  to  follow  the  father's :  His  words  are, 
"  Turn  quod  virilis  stirpis  imperium  prajterri  debuit  foemineo,  maternaque  insig- 
"  nia  paternis  insignibus  cedere  debuerunt." 

The  like  practice  v\as  used  in  England  by  Edward  III.  the  first  of  that  kingdom, 
who  quartered  his  arms  with  those  of  France.  He  placed  France  in  the  second 
and  third  quarters,  as  arms  of  alliance,  upon  the  account  of  his  mother  Isabel, 
daughter  and  heir  of  Philip  IV.  of  France,  and  of  her  brothers,  Charles  IV.  Philip 
V.  and  Lewis  XI.  successive  kings  of  France,  who  died  without  any  issue.  Theu' 
cousin-german  Philip  de  Valois,  as  heir-male,  ascended  the  throne  :  and,  as  Ed- 
ward Howes  tell  us,  in  his  History  of  England,  King  Edward's  ambassadors,  who 
came  to  congratulate  his  accession  to  the  crown,  were  questioned,  Why  the  King  of 
England  placed  the  leopards  of  that  kingdom  in  the  first  quarter  before  the  lilies 
of  France  in  the  second  ?  To  which  Sir  John  Shorditch,  the  ambassador,  made 
answer,  That  it  was  the  custom  of  the  times  to  set  the  title  and  arms  of  the  fathers 
before  those  of  the  mothers ;  which  their  king  had,  in  reason  and  duty,  dune. 
From  which  it  is  to  be  observed,  that  arms  of  alHance,  upon  the  account  of  ma- 
ternal descent,  were  then  quartered  with  the  paternal,  which  had  the  precedency 
of  the  maternal;  and  which  is  yet  the  ordinary  custom  in  Europe,  excepting  for 
some  special  reasons,  as  that  of  the  same  King  Edward  III.  who,  upon  no  other 
account,  at  first,  quartered  the  arms  of  France,  but  upon  the  reason  of  his  alliance : 
yet  afterwards,  in  the  i4th  year  of  his  reign,  when  he  was  encouraged  by  his 
aUies,  to  claim  the  kingdom  of  France  in  right  of  his  mother,  he  placed  those  of 
France,  as  arms  of  dominion  and  pretension,  in  the  first  quarter,  before  the  arms 
of  England  ;  which  his  predecessors  have  continued. 

About  the  latter  end  of  this  king's  reign,  the  English  nobility  began,  in  imita- 
tion of  him,  to  quarter  with  their  own  arms  coats  of  alliances.  John  Hastings, 
Earl  of  Pembroke,  who  married  Margaret,  youngest  daughter  of  Edward  III.  was 
the  first  subject  in  England,  (says  Sandford,  in  his  genealogical  History  of  that 
kingdom)  who,  in  imitation  of  liis  king,  had  quartered  arms,  viz.  first  and  fourth 
or,  a  manche  ^u!es  ;  second  and  third  harry  of  t\\  elve  pieces,  argent  and  azure, 
with  eight  martlets  orle-ways  gules,  as  arms  of  alliance  with  the  family  of  Val- 
lance  :  which  quartered  coat  he  impaled  with  the  arms  of  his  countess,  being  then 
the  same  with  her  father's,  France  and  England  quarterly. 

With  us  our  great  families  did  not  all  begin  at  one  time  to  quarter  their  arms 
with  other  coats,  upon  account  of  alliance,  and  other  considerations.  The  first 
practice  of  quartering  I  have  met  with  upon  seals,  was  in  the  reign  of  King  Ro- 
bert II.  who  was  crowned  in  Scoon  the  27th  of  March  1371,  as  I  have  observed 
before.  His  sons,  then,  and  Leslie,  who  married  the  heiress  of  Ross,  withothers, 
began  to  marshal  their  arms  with  those  of  other  families  ;  of  which,  m  the  first 
part  of  this  system.  As  also  did  David  Lindsay,  first  Earl  of  Crawford,  assume 
the  coat  of  Abernethy,  and  quartered  it  with  his  own,  upon  the  account  he  was 
descended  of  that  family  by  the  mother's  side :  for  his  grandfather.  Sir  David 
Lindsay,  in  the  reign  of  King  Robert  I.  married  one  of  the  three  co-heiresses  of 
Alexander  Lord  Abernethy  ;  whose  arms  were  or,  a  lion  rampant  gules,  bruised 
with  a  ribbon  snble,  quartered  with  his  paternal,  gules,  a  fesse  cbecjue,  argent  and 
azure.  Which  figures  were  upon  David  first  Earl  of  Crawford  his  seal ;  and  ever 
since  have  been  continued  by  the  family. 

A  long  time  after,  the  Earls  of  Douglas  and  Rothes  being  descended  of  the 
other  two  co-heiresses  of  the  above  Alexander  Lord  Abernethy,  marshalled  the 
arms  of  Abernethy  with  their  own. 

The  great  and  illustrious  house  of  Douglas,  for  what  I  have  seen,  had  no  quar- 
tered coats  before  William,  the  first  Earl  of  Douglas,  married  Margaret,  daughter 
of  Donald,  sister  and  sole  heir,  at  last,  to  her  brother  Thomas,  Earl  of  Marr  :  for, 
before  this  match,  he  had  only  his  single  paternal  coat  on  his  seal  of  arms,  which 
I  have  seen  appended  to  a  charter  of  his,  of  the  church  of  Meikle  Cavers,  to  the 
abbacy  of  Melrose  ;  but  after  the  marriage  with  Margaret  Marr,  countess  and 
heiress  of  Marr,  he  quartered  his  paternal  coat  with  that  of  Marr,  viz.  first  and 
fourth  argent,  a  man's  heart  gules,  (not  ensigned  with  a  crown  as  now)  and,  on  a 
chief  azure,  three  stars  of  the  first  ;  second  and  third  azure,  a  bend  betwixt  six 
cross  croslets  fitched  or,  for  Marr :  which  arms  I  have  seen,  on  his  seal,  appended 


OF  M/VRSHALLING  ARMS,  i^a.  45 

to  his  charter,  dated  at  the  Castle  of  Kildrunimy,  the  22d  of  July  1377,  wherein 
he  is  designed  Earl  of  Douglas  and  Marr,  of  the  lands  of  Easter-Foulis,  lying  in 
the  Earldom  of  Marr,  and  shire  of  Aberdeen,  granted  to  James  Mowat.  Theii 
shield  of  arms  on  the  seal  was  couche,  and  quartered,  as  I  have  said,  with  Dougla^- 
aiid  Marr,  supported  by  one  lion  sciant,  holding  up  the  shield,  his  head  in  a  helmet, 
created  with  a  plume  of  feathers  ;  and,  at  each  side  of  the  shield,  is  a  tree  growing 
out  of  a  mount,  as  a  compartment,  seme  of  cross  croslets,  and  upon  the  compart- 
ment the  right  side  of  the  shield  rests.  His  son  James,  Earl  of  Djuglas  and 
Marr,  carried  the  same  arms  as  his  father,  as  is  evident  by  his  seals.  He  could  not 
have  carried  Marr  if  he  had  not  been  the  son  of  Margaret,  Countess  of  Marr. 
It  was  this  valiant  Earl  that  overthrew  Henry  Percy,  surnamed  Hotspur,  in  a 
combat  at  Newcastle  ;  and  again  defeat  him  in  the  battle  of  Otteiburn,  which  was 
fought  the  31st  of  July  1308.  After  the  battle,  this  noble  Earl  James  died  in  his 
tent.  He  had  no  issue  but  two  natural  sons  ;  and  was  succeeded  by  his  half- 
brother  Archibald,  Lord  of  Galloway,  in  the  earldom  of  Douglas ;  and  by  his  full 
sister  Isabel  Douglas,  in  the  Earldom  of  Marr. 

Archibald  Earl  of  Douglas  and  Galloway  carried  three  coats  quarterly,  first 
azure,  a  lion  rampant  argent,  being  the  feudal  arms  of  Galloway  ;  second,  the 
arms  of  Douglas  as  above  for  his  paternal  coat;  third  azure,  three  mullets  argent, 
the  arms  of  Elizabeth  his  wife,  daughter  and  heir  of  Sir  Thomas  Murray,  Lord  of 
i>ot\wit\\,  panitariiis  Scotia,  with  whom  he  got  the  lordship  of  Bothwell ;  and  the 
fourth  quarter  as  the  first.  It  is  to  be  observed,  that  this  Earl  and  his  father  Earl 
William,  quartered  their  wives'  arms,  being  heiresses,  with  their  own  ;  which  it 
seems  was  our  ancient  practice,  as  well  as  to  marshal  them,  as  by  impalement,  or 
by  way  of  inescutcheon.  This  Earl  had  nothing  of  the  arms  of  Marr,  so  that  they 
entirely  belonged  to  Isabel  Countess  of  Marr. 

Lady  Isabel  Douglas  Countess  of  Marr,  married  Alexander  Stewart,  natural  son 
of  Alexander  Stewart  of  Badenoch,  Earl  of  Buchan,  fourth  son  of  King  Robert  II. 
He  is  nevertheless  called  the  eldest  son  of  the  Earl  of  Buchan,  in  a  charter  granted  to 
him  anno  1404,  by  his  lady  Isabel  Douglas  Countess  of  Marr  :  by  which  charter 
she  gives  him  the  Earldom  of  Marr  and  Lordship  of  Garioch,  in  consideration  of 
the  marriage  :  and  no  doubt  it  was  also  in  consideration  of  that  marriage  that 
he  is  said  to  be  the  eldest  son  of  his  father  ;  which  does  not  follow  that  he  was 
not  a  bastard  :  For  if  he  had  been  £  lawful  son,  he  had  certainly  succeeded 
his  father  in  the  earldom  of  Buchan,  which  earldom  went  to  John  Earl  of 
Buchan,  a  younger  son  of  Robert  Duke  of  Albany.  Alex.\.nder  Stewart  Earl 
of  Marr,  by  right  of  his  wife,  as  said  is,  carried  for  arms  on  his  seal,  which  I  have 
seen,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  or,  a  fcbse  cheque  (for  Stewart),  between  three 
open  crowns  gules,  which  were  the  figures  of  the  lordship  of  Garioch,  and  in  these 
quarters  he  had  no  mark  of  illegitimation  ;  second  and  third,  the  arms  of  Marr 
as  before,  azure,  a  bend  betwixt  six  cross  croslets  fitched  or  :  He  was  commander 
in  chief  at  the  battle  of  Harlaw  anno  141 1,  a  man  of  great  honour,  an  ornament 
to  his  country,  and  died  without  issue  aiaw  1426.  The  earldom  afterwards  fell 
into  the  king's  hands,  and  the  sons  of  the  royal  family  were  afterwards  designed 
Earls  of  Marr. 

Many  of  our  ancient  families,  since  the  reign  of  King  Robert  II.  have  been  in 
use  to  quarter  the  arms  of  other  families  with  their  own,  upon  account  of  alliances 
and  other  considerations.  Many  of  our  ancient  and  principal  families,  as  tveith 
Earl  Marischal,  Hay  Earl  of  Errol,  Ogilvie  Earl  of  Au-he,  Carnegie  Earl  of  Sduth- 
esk,  Forbes  Lord  Forbes,  and  many  great  barons  too  numerous  here  to  mention, 
have  only  been  in  use,  and  to  this  day,  to  carry  their  single  paternal  coats.  Perhaps 
many  of  them  have  had  no  occasion  to  marshal  their  arms  with  others,  and  some 
of  them  have  had  good  right  to  quaiter  the  arms  of  other  families,  upon  the  ac- 
count of  alliances  and  other  considerations ;  but  upon  what  reason  they  have 
forborne  them  I  cannot  pretend  to  know.  Perhaps,  upon  the  mibtaken  notion, 
that  the  more  single  and  plain  the  coat  of  arms  be,  it  is  the  more  honourable,  and 
shows  a  principal  family.  But  what  does  it  lose  of  that  appearance  of  honour, 
when  marshalled  plain  and  simple  with  other  arms,  upon  the  account  of  an  ho- 
nourable alHance,  noble  feus,  and  other  additaments  of  honour  .'  Since  it  has  been, 
for  many  ages,  the  general  practice  of  kings,  princes,  and  nobles,  to  marshal  other 

Vol.  II.  M 


46  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ^c . 

arms  with  their  own,  as  rather  an  additament  of  honour  than  a  diminution  of  it, 
and  which  does  not  in  the  least  alter  the  quality  of  the  bearer,  according  to  the 
opinion  of  lawyers  ;  as  Hoppingius  de  Jure  Insigiiium,  cap  n.  "  Cumulatio  insig- 
"  nium  est  argumentum  aucti  honoris;  insignium  siquidem  auctione,  honor  et 
"  dignitas  personae  superveniens,  ejus  qualitatem  nunquam  mutat  aut  extin- 
"  guit." 

That  some  of  our  ancient  families,  as  I  just  now  said,  have  had  right  to  quarter 
the  arms  of  other  families  with  their  own,  upon  the  account  of  marriage,  and  have 
not  done  it  till  of  late,  appears  from  what  follows. 

The  ancient  and  noble  family  of  Maule,  who  carry,  for  their  paternal  arms, 
parti,  argent  and  gules,  a  bordure  charged  with  eight  escalops,  all  counter-changed 
of  the  same,  is  originally  French  ;  and  have  their  name  from  the  Lordship  of 
Maule,  near  Paris,  their  first  and  original  lands,  in  latter  times  erected  into  a  mar- 
quisate.     [Description  of  the  Generality  of  Paris.] 

Ansold  Lord  of  Maule,  and  Rectrude  his  wife,  made  a  donation  to  the  priory 
of  St  Martine  des  Camps,  at  Paris,  in  the  year  1015,  mentioned  by  Laboureur  in 
his  History  of  Chamont ;  and  his  son  Guarin  Lord  of  Maule,  with  Hersende  his 
wife,  is  named  in  a  charter  of  Robert  King  of  France,  to  William  abbot  of  St 
Germains,  before  the  year  103 1.  (History  of  Montmorency  by  Du  Chesne.)  He 
was  succeeded  by  his  son  Ansold,  called  by  Ordericus  Vitalis,  for  his  great  riches, 
Dives  Parisietuis ;  who  left  Peter,  his  heir,  and  Stephen,  grandfather  to  Grimald 
de  Maule,  who,  says  Ordericus,  was  at  the  taking  of  Jerusalem  in  1098,  with 
Godfrey  of  Boulogne.  Peter,  next  Lord  of  Maule,  made  a  very  great  figure,  with 
consent  of  his  proceres  et  7iiilites,  says  the  above  author,  who  lived  near  that  time. 
He  founded  a  priory  at  his  town  of  Maule,  for  Benedictine  monks  of  St  Euvroul, 
to  whom  he  gave  his  churches  of  St  Mary,  St  Germain,  and  St  Vincent,  with 
many  lands  ;  by  his  charter  dated  in  the  1077,  printed  at  length  in  the  Histories 
Normanwjrum  Scriptures,  p.  587  ;  and  in  the  year  1098  he  was  general  of  the 
French  army  against  King  William  IL  of  England,  who  had  invaded  France,  and 
obliged  that  Prince  to  raise  the  siege  of  Mountfort,  and  conclude  a  truce  and  re- 
turn to  England.  (Du  Moulin's  History  of  Normandy,  page  267.)  By  Guindes- 
moth  his  w'ife,  of  a  noble  family  in  Champagne,  he  had  four  sons  and  as  many 
daughters.  Of  the  last,  one  was  married  to  Baudry  Count  of  Dreux,  son  to 
Baudry  Constable  of  France  ;  another  to  Gaucher  Lord  of  Poissy,  whose  descen- 
dants were  heritable  Pantriers  of  Normandy ;  and  a  third  to  Hugh  Lord  Voisins,  pre- 
decessor to  the  Seneschals  of  Toulouse.  Ansold  Lord  of  Maule,  his  eldest  son, 
was  a  great  captain,  and  famous  in  the  wars  of  Italy  and  Greece  :  he  was  with 
Robert  Duke  of  Apuha  at  the  siege  of  Durrazzo,  and  distinguished  himself  at  that 
great  battle  where  Alexis  Emperor  of  Constantinople  was  overthrown,  anno  1106. 
He  confirmed  his  father's  donations  to  the  priory  of  Maule,  in  presence  of  his 
barons  and  knights,'  whom  he  caused  do  homage  to  his  eldest  son  Peter.  (Orderi- 
cus Vitalis,  page  589,  590.)  He  married  Odeiine  Mauvoisine,  daughter  to  Ra- 
dulph  Lord  of  Rony,  Governor  of  Mante,  and  died  anno  11 18.  His  son  Peter  de 
Maule,  was  one  of  the  powerfullest  lords  of  that  time  ;  he  was  one  of  the  P'rench 
generals  at  the  battle  of  Brenville,  fought  in  11 19  against  King  Henry  I.  of  Eng- 
land, and,  in  the  year  1138,  he  went  to  the  siege  of  Breteuil,  accompanied  with 
forty  knights ;  but,  his  power  rendering  him  suspected.  King  Lewis  le  Gros 
came  and  demolished  his  strong  castle  of  Maule.  (Ordericus  and  Du  Moulin.)  He 
married  Ade  daughter  to  the  Earl  of  Guines,  and  niece  to  the  Lord  of  Montmo- 
rency, and  was  succeeded  by  his  son  Roger,  who  married  Idone  daughter  to  Wa- 
lon  Viscount  of  Chaumont,  and  Matilde  de  Montmorency  his  wife.  She  is  men- 
tioned with  him  in  an  agreement  he  made  with  the  Chapter  of  Paris  in  the  1195. 
(Grand  Pastoral  of  Paris.)  He  had  Peter,  Robert,  and  Simon  de  Maule,  abbot  of 
loinville.  (Gallia  Christiana).  Peter  III.  of  that  name  gave  certain  vineyards 
lying  in  his  Lordship  of  Maule  to  the  abbacy  of  Joinville,  by  his  charter  in  the 
year  1224.  Of  which  I  have  seen  an  attested  copy  from  the  writs  of  that  abbacy, 
having  his  seal  appended  to  it,  which  is  very  large  ;  and  thereon  a  shield  of  his 
arms,  being  a  parti,  with  a  bordure  of  nine  escalops,  and  the  legend  SigiUwn  Petri 
de  Maulia.\  He  is  also  mentioned  by  De  la  Rocque  in  his  treatise  Bu  Ban  et 
Arriereban,  among  the  Seigneurs  of  France  summoned  to  attend  the  King  in  his 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ef. . 


47 


wars  anno  1236,  and  again  in  1242.  He  was  succeeded  by  his  brother  Robert, 
who  was  in  thj  expedition  to  the  holy  land  with  the  Duke  of  Brittany  and  many 
French  lords  anno  1237,  where  he  was  taken  prisoner  by  tiie  Turks ;  and,  at  his 
return,  founded  the  priory  of  St  Leonard,  in  his  barony  of  Panmure,  which  hes 
contiguous  to  Maule.  His  arms  are  done  in  ancient  painting  in  the  church  of 
Maule  ;  the  shield  coiiche,  parti,  ardent  ^nd  gules,  within  a  bordure  j.7/;/r,  of  twelve 
escalops  of  the  first,  with  helmet,  mantling,  and  wreath  ;  upon  which  are  three 
ostrich  feathers  or,  for  crest,  and  supported  by  two  savages,  proper,  wreathed  about 
the  middle  ;  which  ancient  arms  are  cut  in  the  Plate  of  Achievements.  Below  the 
arms  is  this  inscription  in  old  French :  "  Messire  Robert  de  Maule,  lequel  fut 
"  prisonnier  en  Turquie,  &■  a  son  retour  fonda  le  perieure  de  St  Leonard,  assis  dans 
"  la  Baronnie  de  Panmor,  comme  ill  se  veoit  par  les  lettres  de  !a  fondation  dudit 
"  prieure  datte  de  Fan  mil.  " 

The  arms  of  his  son  Bartholomew  Lord  of  Maule,  are  also  painted  in  the  church, 
differing  nothing  from  his  father's,  save  that  the  supporters  are  two  lions,  proper ; 
and  below  are  the  following  words  : 

"  Messieur  Bartholemy  de  Maule,  filz  de  Robert,  lequel  dona  aux  religieux  de 
"  Joyenval  le  fief  de  Andeleu,  assis  en  cette  Baronnie,  comme  il  se  veoit  par  la 
"  Chartre  de  don  en  L'Abbaye  dudit  Joyenval,  datte  de  1'  an  mil  deux  cent." 

He  died  in  anno  124B,  according  to  the  obituary  of  the  abbey  of  Joinville,  and 
was  succeeded  by  his  son  WiUiam,  who  to  a  deed  in  favours  of  that  abbey,  dated 
1263,  appends  his  seal,  of  which  1  have  seen  a  copy,  being  a  shield  a.  parti,  as  be- 
fore, and  a  bordure  of  eight  escalops ;  the  fixed  number  now  born  by  the  family 
of  Panmure,  and  the  legend,  S.  Giiill.  de  Maule  ^rmigeri  ;+  He  married  Sidelene, 
daughter  to  John  Lord  of  Torotte,  Governor  and  hereditary  Butler  of  Champagne, 
by  whom  he  had  Hugh,  father  to  Peter  Lord  of  Maule,  who  gives  a  charter  to 
the  priory  of  Maule,  dated  anno  1306  ;  and  has  his  arms  also  painted  in  the  church, 
wiih  lions  for  supporters,  attended  with  an  ancient  inscription,  such  as  those  al- 
ready given.  Another  Peter,  his  grandson,  married  Julietta  des  Essars,  daughter  to 
the  Lord  of  Ambleville,  and  had  Bertauld  his  heir,  and  Robert  de  Maule,  Master  of 
Requests,  and  Counsellor  to  Charles  VI.  King  of  France,  in  his  Parliament  of. 
Pans.  (Extract  out  of  the  Register  of  the  Parliament  of  Paris  ad  annum  1388.) 
Bertauld,  in  the  inscription  on  his  tomb,  stiled  Seigneur  de  Maule  et  Mon- 
tainville,  is  frequently  mentioned  in  the  wars  during  the  reign  of  King  Charles 
V.  who  beat  tlie  English  out  of  France  ;  he  married  Jacqueline,  daughter  to 
the  Seigneur  de  Blainville,  Marischal  of  France,  by  whom  he  had  Robert  last  Lord 
of  Maule  in  France,  whose  arms  are  yet  to  be  seen  in  the  Notre  Dame  Church 
of  Maule,  with  two  eagles,  proper,  for  supporters,  accompanied  with  the  following 
inscription: 

"  Messire  Robert  de  Maule,  fik  de  Berthault,  lequel  fut  marie  a  Dame  Anne, 
'•  d'Anguilliers,  ainsi  qui'l  se  veoit  parle  traite'  de  leur  mariage  datte  de  V  an  mil 
'•  III"-  IIIF'^-  VII.  &-  mourut  au  voyage  d'  Hongrie." 

He  died  at  the  battle  of  NicopoUs  in  Hungary,  fought  against  the  Turk  in 
the  year  1398,  being  then  possessed  of  the  Lordships  of  Maule,  Panmure,  Mon^ 
tainville,  and  HerbviUe  :  all  which  great  estate  went  to  his  daughter  and  heir 
Reginolde  de  Maule,  married  to  Simon  de  Morainvilliers,  Lord  of  Flacourt,  Pan- 
trier  to  the  Dauphin,  and  Governor  of  Chartres  and  Mante.  Her  arms,  in  lozenge, 
are  also  painted  in  the  church  with  those  of  her  husband,  which  are  argent,  nine 
martlets  sable,  accompanied  with  an  inscription  ;  part  of  which  I  have  given 
in  the  first  volume  of  this  work,  page  359.  Her  descendants  the  Morainvilliers 
Lords  of  Maule,  carried  the  coat  of  Maule  quartered  with  their  own,  from  whom 
it  went,  by  marriage,  to  the  Harlays  of  Sancy,  stiled  in  their  titles  Barons  of 
Maule  :  and  their  heiress  again  was  married  to  the  Marquis  of  Villeroy,  grand- 
father to  the  present  Marischal  and  Duke  of  Villeroy.  This  account  of  the  Lords 
of  Maule  in  France,  beside  the  printed  authors  above  cited,  is  taken  from  their 
charters,  donations  to  abbeys,  and  other  authentic  deeds,  to  many  of  which  their 
seals  are  appended ;  whereof  I  have  seen  copies  attested  by  the  Sieur  Clarembalt, 
Genealogist  to  the  King  of  France  :  I  have  also  seen  draughts  of  their  arms  that 
are  in  the  church,  and  the  inscriptions  given  above,  with  a  great  many  more  on 
the  glass-windows  and  tombs  in  the  church,  and  others  on  the  old  castle  of  Maule,. 


48  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  iJc. 

too  long  to  nienlioii  liere,  all  taken  and  panited  upon  the  place,  with  an  instru- 
ment thereupon  by  Mr  Chevillard,  Genealogist  of  Faris. 

A  son  of  the  Lord  of  Maule  came  over  to  England  with  William  the  Conqueror; 
as  appears  by  the  list  of  that  Prince's  followers  hi  Hollin^lied,  Vol.  IL  page  296 ; 
and  was  rewarded  by  the  Conqueror  with  the  Lordsliip  of  Hattoun  de  Cleveland 
in  Yorkshire,  out  of  which  Robert  and  Stephen  del  Maule  make  donations  to 
the  abbey  of  Whitby,  in  the  reign  of  King  Henry  1.  about  the  year  1130.  (Mo- 
nasticon  Anghcaii-.mi,  Vol.  U.  page  75. _)  They  were  great  barons  of  England,  and 
flourished  several  generations  ia  that  kingdom  :  The  last  of  them  I  find  there  is 
Serlo  de  Maule,  one  of  the  peers  at  the  coronation  of  King  Henry  HI.  anno  1216, 
mentioned  by  John  Fox. 

This  name  having  come  out  of  England  soon  after  the  conquest,  with  several 
other  Normans  and  French,  is  found  among  the  earliest  with  us  in  Scotland.  Wil- 
liam de  Maule  is  witness  to  several  charters  in  the  chartulary  of  St  Andrews,  in 
the  reign  of  King  David  L  before  the  year  1152.  He  got  fro'm  King  David  the 
lordship  of  Fouhs  in  Perthshire,  out  of  which  he  made  several  donations  to  the 
priory  ot  St  Andrews.  (Chartulary  of  St  Andrews.)  Sir  Richard  de  Maule  is  wit- 
ness to  William  Lord  of  Foulis's  donations,  who  designs  him  Nepote  meo  ;  and  also 
to  other  charters  in  King  William  and  King  Alexander's  reigns ;  He  seems  to  be 
father  to  Sir  Peter  and  William  de  Maule,  Archdeacon  of  Lothian,  witness  to  some 
of  King  Alexander's  charters  in  the  chartulary  of  Newbottle.  Sir  Peter  de 
Maule  married  Christian  de  Valoins,  daughter  and  heir  of  William  de  Valoins, 
Lord  Panmure,  and  great  Chamberlain  of  Scotland;  and  got  with  her  the  baronies 
of  Panmure  and  Benvie;  for  which  the  family  of  Panmure  carry,  with  their  pa- 
ternal arms,  those  of  Valoins,  blazoned  in  the  First  Part  of  this  Work.  There  is 
in  the  chartulary  of  Arbroath  a  solemn  agreement  of  this  Sir  Peter  de  Maulia, 
Dominu%  de  Fanmure,  and  Christian  his  wife,  with  the  Abbot  of  Arbroath,  in  pre- 
sence of  Alexander  Earl  of  Buclian,  Justiciar  of  Scotland,  dated  1254.  And  that 
same  year,  after  his  death.  Christian  de  Valoins  granted  a  charter  for  homage  and 
service,  to  John  de  Liddel  of  her  lands  of  Balbenny  and  Panlathy,  which  Bomtnus 
Petnis  de  iMauita,  her  husband,  had  formerly  granted  to  Thomas  de  Liddel  his 
father :  to  which  charter  her  seal  was  appended,  having  thereon  a  lady  in  a  long 
vesture,  with  a  ialcoii  on  her  hand,  without  any  armorial  ligure,  and  the  legend 
S.  Christine  de  I'aloirs,  D — e  de  Panmore.  They  left  two  sons.  Sir  William  and 
Sir  Thomas  de  Maule,  Governor  of  the  Castle  of  Brechin,  which  Matthew  V\^est- 
mmster  says,  '■  He  long  and  gallantly  defended  against  King  Edward  L  of  Eng- 
land, till  be  was  slain  in  anno  1303."  Sir  IVitiiam  de  Maule,  Bomimis  de  Panmore, 
is  one  of  the  barons  of  Scotland  who  swore  fealty  to  King  Edward  I.  in  the  year 
1 291.  (Rymer's  Foedera,  Tom.  H.  page  57c.)  In  anno  1293  he  grants  a  charter 
of  his  lands  of  Benvie  and  Ballrutherie  to  Rodolph  de  Dundee  ;  which  the  Scrim- 
geuurs.  Constables  of  Dundee,  held  long  of  the  family  of  Panmure.  He  married 
Etham,  daughter  to  John  de  Vaus  Lord  Dirleton,  and  Sherit^"  of  Edinburgh,  by 
whom  he  had  Sir  Henry  de  Maule,  who  sided  with  King  Robert  Bruce,  by  whom 
he  was  knighted,  and  is  designed  Henriciis  de  Muide,  miles,  Jiliiis  IVillielmi  de 
Maule,  mitttis,  Domini  de  Panmore,  in  a  charter  of  that  King's,  dated  at  Dundee 
the  24th  year  of  King  Robert  1.  his  reign.  He  gives  his  lands  of  Carmylie,  lying- 
in  the  barony  of  Panmure,  to  Alexander  de  Strachan,  by  a  charter  sine  data,  testi- 
hus  Joanne  Episcopo  Brechin,  IViliielmo  de  Montealto,  &-c.  ;  to  which  his  seal  of 
arms  is  appended,  being  of  the  same  size  with  those  of  the  barons,  affixed  to  the 
letter  to  tiic  Pope,  anno  1320  ;  and  thereupon  a  shield  couche,  the  field  parti,  and 
a  bordure  of  eight  escalops,  without  any  exterior  ornament  or  legend.  His  son 
Walter  de  Maule,  next  Baron  of\Panmure,  gave  a  charter  of  his  lands  of  Carnegie, 
lying  in  the  barony  of  Panmure,  to  John  de  Banhaird,  to  be  held  of  him  and  his 
heirs,  confirmed  by  King  David  U.  (Haddington's  Coll.  p.  574.)  He  grants  also 
his  lands  of  Moncur  to  Henry  Strachan  de  Carmylie,  by  a  charter,  anno  1346, 
to  which  his  seal  is  appended,  being  much  larger  than  his  father's,  and  thereon  a 
shield  couche  charged  with  the  same  bearing,  viz.  a  parti,  and  a  border  of  eight 
escalops,  and  honourably  trimmed  with  helmet,  mantle,  and  wreath;  upon  which 
is  a  dragon's  head  spouting  out  fire,  and  the  wings  erected,  and  the  legend  round  the 
seal,  S.  Gault.  de  MaulL     The  seal  with  which  this  was  impressed,  though  much 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ^c.  49. 

worn,  is  yet  extant,  being  of  silver,  and  cut  in  the  Plate  of  Achievements,  and 
is  the  most  ancient  seal  that  1  have  seen.  He  died  in  the  year  1348.  (Chartulary 
of  Brechin.)  William,  Baron  of  Paumure,  his  son,  married  Marion  Fleming, 
daughter  to  Sir  David  Fleming,  predecessor  to  the  Earl  of  Wigton,  by  his  first 
wife  Jean,  daughter  to  the  Lord  Brechin,  and  was  father  to  Su  Thomas  Maule, 
who  was  killed,  with  all  his  name,  at  the  bloody  battle  of  Harlaw  anno  1411; 
by  which  this  family  would  have  been  extinguished,  if  his  lady,  a  daughter  of  the 
Lord  Gray's,  had  not  been  with  child,  who,  after  her  husband's  death,  bore  a  son. 
Sir  Thomas  Maule,  designed  Lord  of  Panmm'e  in  a  deed  betwixt  him  and  John 
Lyon  Lord  of  Glammis.  It  was  this  Sir  Thomas,  as  heir  to  his  grandmother,  who 
laid  claim,  at  the  Earl  of  Atlijol's  death,  to  the  Lordship  of  Brechin  ;  which  being 
included  in  Athol's  forfeiture.  Sir  Thomas  recovered  only  the  lands  of  Hcdder- 
wick,  Jackstoun,  and  Staddockmoor,  with  Leuchland's  part  of  the  lordship  of 
Brechin  ;  but  afterwards  the  timiily  of  Panmure  came  to  enjoy  tlie  whole  lord- 
ship, with  the  title  of  Lord  Brechin,  and  carried  the  Lord  Brechin's  arms  with 
those  of  Maule  and  Valoins  ;  as  marshalled  in  the  First  Part  of  this  Work.  His 
son  Sir  Thomas,  third  of  that  name,  was  very  eminent  in  the  reign  of  King  James 
III.  being  stiled  in  many  writs,  Nobilis  et  potens  Domiruis  Thomas  Mxiuh,.  Dominus 
de  Panmure,  and  married  Elizabeth  Lindsaj',  daughter  to  Alexander  Earl  of  Craw- 
ford ;  whose  mother  was  the  Lady  Margaret,  lawful  daughter  to  King  Robert  II. 
His  eldest  son,  Alexander,  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  to  Sir  David  Guthrie  of  that 
Ilk,  Lord  High-Treasurer  of  Scotland,  and  was  designed  of  Camcstoun  and  Hed- 
derwick,  in  several  charters,  (which  I  have  seen)  before  the  year  1491,  to  which 
his  seal  is  appended,  and  on  the  shield  a  parti,  with  a  bordure  of  eight  escalops,  and 
a  label  of  three  points  in  chief,  as  a  difference;  for  he  died  before  his  father,  who 
was  succeeded  by  his  grandson  Sir  Thomas  Maule,  fourth  of  the  name,  killed 
With  King  James  IV.  at  the  fatal  battle  of  Flodden,  a?ina  1513,  whose  son  was  Robert 
next  Baron  of  Panmure,  active  in  the  wars  during  the  minority  of  Queen  Mary, 
being  of  the  French  faction,  and  against  the  union  with  England. 

His  great-grandson  was  Patrick  Maule  Earl  of  Panmure,  Gentleman  of  the  Bed- 
chamber to  King  James  VI.  and  King  Charles  I.  Keeper  of  his  Majesty's  House  and 
Park  of  Eltham  in  England,  and  Sheriil-Principal  of  Angus.  He  married  three 
wives,  first  Frances  Stanhope,  daughter  to  Sir  Edwai'd  Stanhope,  Lord  President  of 
the  North.  Secondly,  Mary  Waldrum,  Maid  of  Honour  to  King  Charles  I.  his 
queen,  and  a  near  cousin  of  the  great  Duke  of  Buckingham:  And,  lastly,  Ladv 
Mary  Erskine,  daughter  to  John  Earl  of  Marr,  Lord  High  Treasurer  of  Scotland. 
His  daughters  were  married  to  the  Earls  of  Kinghorn,  Linlithgow,  and  Northesk. 
His  eldest  son,  George,  second  Earl  of  Panmure,  served  the  king  in  the  civil  war 
as  colonel  of  a  regiment  of  horse,  and  married  Lady  Jean  Campbell,  eldest  daugh- 
ter to  John  Earl  of  Loudon,  Chancellor  of  Scotland,  by  whom  he  had  George  Lord 
Maule,  James  Maule  of  Balumbie,  afterwards  Earl  of  Panmure,  Mr  Hary  Maule  of 
Kelly,  and  Lady  Mary,  married  to  Charles  Earl  of  Marr.  George,  tliird  Earl  of 
Panmure,  was  one  of  the  Lords  of  the  Privy-Council  to  King  Charles  H.  and  King 
James  VII.  and  married  Lady  Jean  Fleming,  only  daughter  to  John  Earl  of  Wig- 
ton;  but,  dying  without  surviving  issue,  was  succeeded  by  his  brother  James,  fourth 
Earl  of  Panmure,  who  was  of  the  Privy-Council  of  King  James  VII.  and  married 
Lady  Margaret  Hamilton,  daughter  to  William  Duke  of  Hamilton.  I  have  al- 
ready given  the  full  achievement  of  the  Earls  of  Panmure  in  the  First  Volume  of 
this  Work,  page  360,  which  I  here  repeat  again,  viz.  quarterly,  first  parted  per 
pale,  argent  and  gules,  a  bordure  charged  with  eight  escalops,  all  counter-changed 
of  the  same,  for  Maule;  second  argent,  three  pallets  waved  gules,  for  the  Valoins; 
third  quarter,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  azure,  a  cheveron  betwixt  three  crosses 
patee,  argent;  second  and  third  or,  three  piles  issuing  from  the  chief,  conjoined  by 
the  points  in  base  gules,  for  Barclay  Lord  Brechin;  and  the  fourth  grand  quarter 
as  the  first:  Which  arms  are  adorned  with  crown,  helmet,  and  volets,  befitting 
their  quality;  and,  on  a  wreath  of  their  tinctures,  a  dragon  vert,  spouting  out  fire 
before  and  behind,  proper,  for  crest;  with  the  motto,  on  an  mcrol,  dementia  el 
animis;  and  supported  by  two  greyhounds,  proper,  collared  gules,  charged  with, 
escalops  argent. 

Vol,  IL  N 


50  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ISc 

The  branches  of  this  noble  family  that  I  have  found  are  these  following,  accord- 
ing to  the  time  of  their  descent  from  the  principal  stem,  though  many  of  them  have 
neglected  to  register  their  arms  with  proper  differences. 

The  fast  is  Maule  of  Boath,  descended  of  William  Maule,  second  son  to  Sir 
Thomas  Maule  of  Panmure,  killed  at  Flodden:  This  William  married  Janet  Car- 
negie, daughter  to  John  Carnegie  of  Kinnaird,  predecessor  to  the  Earls  of  Southesk, 
by  whom  he  had  Thomas,  killed  at  the  battle  of  Pinky,  and  David  Maule  of  Boath, 
who,  by  Katharine  his  wife,  daughter  to  David  Balfour  of  Tarry,  had  David  Maule, 
also  of  Boath,  whose  wife  was  daughter  of  Lindsay  of  Kinnettles :  His  son,  Hary 
Maule  of  Boath,  married  Grissel  Seaton,  daughter  of  Seaton  of  Touch.  The  lineal 
succession  continued  till  the  reign  of  King  Charles  L  There  are  severals  descend- 
ed of  this  firaily,  as  the  Maules  in  Sweden,  of  whom  James  Maule  was  President 
of  the  Police,  and  Intendant-General  of  the  Mines  of  that  kingdom ;  and  another, 
a  Major-General  in  the  King  of  Denmark's  service.  Captain  John  Maule,  whose 
father  was  a  younger  son  of  Boath,  carried  parted  per  pale,  nehuU,  argent  and 
gules,  a  bordure  of  eight  escalops,  all  counter-changed ;  crest,  a  sheaf  of  corn,  pro- 
per: motto,  Iiidustria  ditat.     N.  R. 

Maule  of  Melgum,  parted  per  pale,  argent  and  gules,  on  a  bordure  wavy  eight 
escalops,  all  counter-changed.  The  first  of  this  family  was  Hary  Maule  of  Inner- 
peffer,  eldest  son  of  Robert,  Baron  of  Panmure,  by  his  second  wife  Isabel  Arbuth- 
not,  daughter  of  Sir  Robert  Arbuthnot  of  that  Ilk.  He  had  Henry  Maule  of  Mel- 
gum :  His  son,  James  Maule  of  Melgum,  married  Marion  Ogilvie,  daughter  to 
Ogilvie  of  Innerquharity. 

Thomas  Maule,  who  was  a  second  son  of  Melgum,  gave  the  partition  line  waved; 
thus,  parted  per  pale  wavy,  argent  and  gules,  on  a  bordure  eight  escalops,  all  coun- 
ter-changed. 

NL^ULE  of  Guildie.  The  first  of  this  family  was  Andrew  Maule,  one  of  the  Gen- 
tlemen Pensioners  to  King  James  VL  and  second  son  of  the  second  marriage  to 
Robert  Maule  Baron  of  Panmure. 

Maule  of  Pitlivie  and  Ardouny,  descended  of  Thomas  Maule,  fifth  son  to 
Thomas,  fifth  of  that  name,  Baron  of  Panmure.  Of  this  branch  there  ha^e  been 
several  honourable  persons,  as  Robert  Maule,  Esq.  Page  of  Honour  to  King 
James  VI.  and  Gentleman  of  the  Privy-Chamber  to  King  Charles  I.;  and  Thomas 
iVIaule,  Esq.  Gentleman  of  the  Bed-Chamber  to  Prince  George  of  Denmark  ;  and 
a  flourishing  family  of  the  Maules  in  Ireland,  whose  arms  are  not  registrate  in  our 
hooks. 

Maule  of  Balmakelly,  second  son  to  Patrick  Earl  of  Panmure,  and  Frances 
Stanhope  his  wife,  was  colonel  of  a  regiment  of  foot  in  the  service  of  King  Charles  U. 
He  married  a  daughter  of  the  Earl  of  Wemyss. 

James  Maule  of  Balumbie,  second  son  to  George  Earl  of  Panmure,  before  he  was 
Earl,  carried  the  simple  arms  of  Maule,  with  a  crescent  for  difference. 

And  Mr  Hary  Maule  of  Kelly,  the  third  son,  carried  first  the  paternal  arms  of 
Maule,  with  a  mullet,  and  afterwards  the  quartered  coat  of  Panmure,  with  a  cres- 
cent for  difference,  with  crest  and  supporters;  the  same  with  his  brother  the  Earl 
of  Panmure,  being  now  the  only  representative  of  this  noble  family :  motto,  de- 
mentia et  animis. 

The  second  way  of  marshalling  arms  in  one  shield,  called  by  Sir  John  Feme 
a  quartered  coat,  is  when  there  are  more  than  two  coats  quartered  together ;  then 
the  fourth  quarter  is  not  always  the  same  with  the  first,  nor  the  third  quarter  the 
same  with  the  second,  but  different  arms;  which  shows  the  bearer's  alliance  to 
several  families. 

The  Stewarts  Earls  of  Traquair  carry  four  coats,  quarterly,  first  Stewart, 
second  Buchan,  as  descended  of  a  younger  son  of  Stewart  of  Buchan,  a  branch  of 
the  Stewarts  Earls  of  Athol ;  third  sable,  a  mullet  argent;  and  fourth  argent,  an 
orle  gules,  and  in  chief  three  martlets  sable,  for  marrying  one  of  the  heiresses  of 
Rutherford  of  that  Ilk,  in  the  reign  of  King  James  IV. 

Campbell  Earl  of  Breadalbane  carries  three  coats  quarterly;  first  gironne  oi 
eight  pieces,  or  and  sable,  his  paternal  coat ;  second  argent,  a  galley  sable,  her  sails 
trussed  up,  and  oars  in  action,  for  Lorn;  third  or,  a  fesse  cheque,  azure  and  argent, 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  i^c-  51 

as  descended  of  one  of  the  heiresses  of  Stewart  of  Lorn;  the  fourth  quarter  as  the 
first. 

^lartered  Arms  have  sometimes  an  inescutcheon  surmounting  them  in  the 
centre,  which  contain  arms  of  alliance,  paternal  or  feudal  ones.  Which  httle 
shield  or  inescutcheon  was  called,  of  old,  by  our  heralds,  a  moyen  in  fesse;  by  the 
English,  an  escutcheon  of  pretence;  and  by  the  French,  a  surtout;  because  it  covers 
some  part  of  all  the  four  quarters ;  and  the  Latins  say,  media  re^'ioni  incumhit 
parmula. 

As  for  the  antiquity  of  bearing  an  inescutcheon  over  arms,  we  find  it  anciently 
used  by  the  Emperors  of  Germany;  for  they  always  placed  an  inescutcheon  of  their 
paternal  coat  on  the  breast  of  the  imperial  eagle,  to  show  that  they  were  elective, 
and  out  of  what  family. 

Guillim  observes,  that  in  the  reign  of  Richard  IL  of  England,  Simon  Burly  bare 
over  his  own  arms  an  inescutcheon  of  the  arms  of  Hussay.  The  first  bearing  of  an 
inescutcheon  over  arras  that  Sandford  gives  us,  is  that  of  Richard  Duke  of  Y(jrk, 
who,  in  the  year  1442,  carried,  quarterly,  quartered,  first  France  and  England 
quarterly,  with  a  label  of  three  points  argent,  charged  with  nine  torteauxes; 
second  Castile  and  Leon  quarterly;  third  Mortimer  and  Burgh,  quarterly;  and 
fourth  as  the  first.  Which  first  quarter  were  his  paternal  arms,  as  descended  of 
King  Edward  III.  and  the  third  quarter  was  his  maternal :  And  over  all  an  in- 
escutcheon gules,  charged  with  three  lions  passant  gardant  or,  within  a  bordure 
argent,  for  Holland,  being  these  of  his  grandmother  Eleanor  Countess  of  March. 

The  ancientest  bearing  of  an  inescutcheon  or  surtout  that  I  have  met  with,  was 
on  the  seal  of  arms  of  John  Earl  of  FLANr^ns,  son  and  heir  of  Philip  the  Bold 
Dulce  of  Burgundy,  and  his  wife  Margaret,  Countess  and  heiress  of  Flanders.  This 
Earl  John  carried  the  arms  of  his  father,  Burgundy  modern  and  ancient,  quarterly; 
and  the  arms  of  his  mother,  being  those  of  Flanders,  on  an  inescutcheon  over  all, 
anno  1404,  which  were  continued  so  marshalled  by  his  son  and  successor  till  the 
good  Duke  of  Burgundy  added  more  qu::rters. 

The  ancient  and  honourable  family  of  the  Hays  of  Yester,  now  Marquis  of 
TwEEDDALE,  have  carried  anciently  quartered  arms;  for,  in  the  year  1420,' Sir 
William  Hay,  Knight,  Sherift'  of  Peebles  and  Lord  Yester,  carried  then  quarterly 
the  coats  of  Eraser  of  Olivercastle,  and  GiFFORD  of  Yester,  upon  the  account  of 
marriages  with  the  heiresses  of  these  lamilies,  and  placed  his  own  paternal  arms  in 
an  inescutcheon  over  all ;  as  appears  by  his  seal  of  arms  appended  to  the  charter 
of  foundation  of  the  Collegiate  Church  of  St  Bathans,  anno  1421. 

Livingston  Earl  of  Linlithgow  has  his  paternal  arms  quartered  with  those  of 
Callender  of  that  Ilk,  as  a  coat  of  alliance;  and  that  anciently,  upon  the  account 
of  marrying  the  heiress  of  Callender  of  Callender,  viz.  quarterly,  first  and  fourth 
argent,  three  cinquefoils  gules,  within  a  double  tressure  counter-flowered  vert,  for 
Livingston ;  second  and  third  sable,  a  bend  betwixt  six  billets  or,  for  Callendar ; 
over  all,  on  an  inescutcheon  azure,  an  oak  tree  or,  within  a  bordure  argent, 
charged  with  eight  cinquefoils  gules,  as  a  coat  of  augmentation  for  the  title  of 
Linhthgow.  This  noble  family  had  for  some  time  of  late  gilliflowers,  in  place  of 
cinquefoils;  as  in  Sir  George  Mackenzie's  Science  of  Heraldry. 

Sir  Thomas  Home  of  that  Ilk,  in  the  reign  of  King  Robert  III.  married  Nicola, 
Pepdie,  heiress  of  Dunglass,  with  whom  he  got  that  barony,  and  impaled  her  arms 
with  his  own,  which  I  have  seen  cut  upon  stone  in  the  chapel  of  Dunglass.  Their 
son  and  heir  Sir  Alexander  Home  quartered  Home  and  Pepdie  ;  as  appears  by  his 
seal  appended  to  writs,  anno  1445,  which  I  have  seen.  •  His  son  and  heir  again 
maiTied  Margaret  Landels,  heir  of  the  Lord  Landels  ;  and  his  son  Alex.ander  first 
Lord  Home,  placed  by  way  of  surtout  over  his  quartered  arms,  an  inescutcheon  of 
the  arms  of  Landel,  being  or,  an  oiie  azure. 

As  for  the  marshalled  arms  of  the  families  of  the  Earl  of  Marchmont,  Home  of 
Wedderburn,  and  others  of  the  name,  I  have  given  an  accoimt  of  them  in  the  First 
Part  of  this  System. 

It  is  to  be  observed,  that  in  all  arms  quartered  with  coats  of  alliance,  the  paternal 
coat  is  either  placed  in  the  first  quarter,  or  in  surtout,  as  in  the  above  examples  of 
Hay  of  Tweeddale,  Home,  &.c. 


52  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  "iSe. 

The  third  way  of  marshalling  many  coats  of  arms  in  one  shield,  by  the  above- 
named  author,  is  called  arms  quarterly  quartered;  that  is,  when  some  or  all  the 
four  areas  of  the  shield,  commonly  called  the  grand  quarters,  are  agaui  quartered  : 
an  instance  of  such  counter-quartered  arms  I  have  given  a  little  before,  being 
those  of  Richard  Duke  of  York ;  and  I  shall  add,  for  another,  the  arms  of  VV  illiam 
Earl  of  Selkirk,  eldest  son  of  William  Marquis  of  Douglas,  by  his  second  lady, 
Mary  Gordon,  daughter  to  the  Marquis  of  Huntly,  who  married  Anne,  eldest 
daughter  and  heiress  of  James  Duke  of  Hamilton;  upon  which  he  was  created 
Duke  of  Hamilton  for  life  in  the  year  1661,  and  carried,  quarterly,  first  grand 
quarter  quartered,  first  and  fourth  gules,  three  cinquefoils  ermine,  for  Hamilton; 
second  and  third  argent,  a  ship  with  her  sails  trussed  up  sable,  for  the  title  of 
Arran,  as  carried  by  the  family  of  Hamilton.  Second  grand  quarter,  the  arms  of 
Douglas,  argent,  a  man's  heart  gules,  ensigned  with  an  imperial  crown  or,  and,  on  a 
chief  azure,  three  stars  of  the  first.  Third  grand  quarter  as  the  second,  and  the 
fourth  as  the  first.  Here  the  arms  of  Hamilton  are  preferred  to  those  of  his  own, 
being  marshalled  in  the  first  quarter,  upon  the  account,  as  I  think,  of  the  feudal 
dignity  being  invested  in  that  dukedom  only  for  life,  and  obliged  to  take  upon 
him  the  name  of  the  family;  upon  which  account  the  wife's  or  mother's  coat  is 
sometimes  placed  in  the  first  and  fourth  quarters,  when  the  huiband  or  heir  derive 
not  only  their  heritage,  but  their  title  and  dignity  from  the  wife  or  mother ;  as  Sir 
George  Mackenzie  observes,  who  gives  for  instance  the  bearing  of  Ekskine  Earl  of 
Marr,  as  descended  from  the  old  Earls  of  Marr,  who  place  the  arms  of  Marr  be- 
fore those  of  Erskine;  as  did  also  Lyle  Lord  Lyle,  upon  pretension  to  the  Earldom 
of  Marr,  quarter  the  arms  of  Marr  in  the  first  place  before  his  own :  And  Mr  James 
Montgomery  of  Lainshaw,  as  representative  of  the  family  of  Lainshaw,  and  Lord 
Lyle,  takes  upon  him  the  title  of  Lord  Lyle,  whose  descent  see  in  the  First  Part 
of  this  System,  page  216,  and  page  377,  where  he  carries,  quarterly,  first  grand 
quarter  quartered ;  first  and  fourth  azure,  a  bend  betwixt  six  cross  croslets  fitche 
or,  for  Marr  Earl  of  Marr;  second  and  third  gules,  a  fret  or,  for  Lyle  Lord  Lyle  : 
second  grand  quarter,  argent,  on  a  fesse  azure  three  stars  of  the  first,  for  Muir  of 
Skeldon:  third  grand  quarter  as  the  second,  and  fourth  as  the  first;  and  over  all, 
by  way  of  surtout,  the  quartered  coat  of  Montgomery  Earl  of  Eglinton;  crest,  a 
cock  rising;  supporters,  two  leopards,  proper:  motto,  An  I  may. 

This  practice  of  placing  the  wife's  or  mother's  arms  before  paternal  ones,  is  upon 
account  the  wife  or  mother  are  of  more  eminent  nobility  than  the  husband  or 
father.  I  shall  add  some  instances  here  of  this  practice  in  England,  in  marshalling 
the  arms  of  their  wives  and  mothers  as  heiresses,  on  account  of  their  eminency  and 
dignity,  before  those  of  the  father  or  son,  which  has  been  done  by  Knights  Com- 
panions of  the  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Garter,  as  appears  by  their  plates  of  arms 
on  their  stall  in  Windsor-Hall,  so  marshalled  by  the  care  of  the  Garter,  principal 
King  of  Arms  in  England ;  as  Ashmole  gives  them  in  his  Institution  of  that  Order, 
chap.  26.  sect.  4.  p.  718. 

Richard  Nevil,  who  married  Eleanor-,  daughter  and  heir  of  Thomas  Montacute 
Earl  of  Salisbury,  being  created  Earl  of  Salisbury,  after  his  father-in-law's  decease, 
bore  for  arms,  as  on  the  back  of  his  stall  in  Windsor,  as  a  Knight  of  the  Garter, 
first  and  fourth  quarter  counter-quartered,  viz.  first  urgent,  three  fusils  in  fesse 
gules,  for  Montacute;  second  or,  an  eagle  displayed  sable,  for  Monthermer;  third  as 
second,  the  fourth  as  first,  being  the  quartered  arms  of  his  father-in-law,  with  his 
paternal  ones  in  the  second  and  third  quarters,  viz.  gules,  a  saltier  argent,  and  in 
chief  a  lambel  of  three  points  compone  of  the  last,  and  azure.  This  Earl's  eldest 
son,  with  his  wife  Eleanor,  having  married  Anne,  sister  and  sole  heir  of  Henry 
Duke  of  Warwick,  marshalled  her  arms  first,  and  next  his  mother's;  and  both  be- 
fore his  own.  After  the  same  manner,  William  Nevil,  who  married  Jean,  daughter 
and  heiress  of  Thomas  Lord  Falconbridge,  placed  her  arms  in  the  first  quarter,  or, 
a  lion  rampant  azure;  and  his  own  in  the  second  quarter,  gules,  a  saltier  argent, 
charged  in  the  centre  with  a  mullet  sable,  for  his  difference.  He  was  idso  a  Knight 
of  the  Garter. 

The  first  quartered  arms  that  I  meet  with,  as  I  observed  before,  were  no  sooner 
than  in  the  reign  of  King  Robert  II. ;  for,  before  that  time,  there  were  only  single 
coats  to  be  seen;  but  after  the  custom  of  marshaUing  once  began,  those  who  mar- 


OF  NL\RSHALUNG  ARMS,  Wc.  53 

ried'  heiresses,  and  got  honourable  possessions  by  them,  were  fond  tnough  to  show 
their  aUiances,  titles  and  dignities,  and  pretensions  to  the  same. 

The  ancient  family  of  Ogilvie  of  that  Ilk  carried  only,  of  old,  oi\  a  lion />«j-j-a«^ 
Sardant  gules,  collared  and  crowned  with  an  open  crown,  and  not  with  an  arched 
one,  as  now  represented  ;  for  there  were  none  of  that  form  either  in  Scotland  or 
England^when  this  family  matched  with  the  daughter  and  heiress  of  Ramsay  of 
Auchterhouse,  about  the  reign  of  King  Robert  II.  and  with  her  got  the  lands  and 
designation  of  Lord  Ogilvis;  of  Auchterhouse  soon  atter,  as  appears  by  their  seaK 
appended  to  evidents,  on  which  they  quartered  the  arms  of  Ramsay,  viz.  argent, 
an  eagle  displayed  sable,  beaked  and  membred^/z/t-j,  in  the  second  and  third  quar- 
ters, with  those  of  Ogilvie  in  the  fust  and  fourth;  And  many  of  the  brandies  of 
this  family  carried  the  same,  as  Ogilvie  of  Innerquharity ;  of  whom  before.  Ogil- 
VIC  of  Inchmartin,  by  marrying  Christian  Glen,  one  of  the  daugiiters  and  co- 
heiresses of  Sir  John  Glen  of  Inchmartin,  in  the  reign  of  King  Robert  III.  quarter- 
ed the  arms  of  Glen,  viz.  argent,  a  lion  rampant  sable,  armed  and  langued  gules, 
in  the  second  and  third  quarters  with  those  of  Ogilvie.  Ogilvie  of  Findlater, 
married  the  heiress  of  Sinclair  of  Deskford,  in  the  reign  of  King  James  II.  carries 
now  (luai'terly,  first  and  fourth  Ogilvie;  second  and  third  argent,  a  cross  ingrailed 
sable,  for  Sinclair.  These  arms  are  illimiinated,  with  many  other  barons'  arms  in 
the  House  of  Falahall,  1604,  with  this  variation,  that  tlie  lion  in  the  first  aiv.1 
fourth  quarters  is  not  crowned,  and  below  the  Hon,  in  these  tv/o  quarters,  is 
placed  a  crescent  gules.  The  first  of  this  family  is  said  to  be  a  third  son  of  Sir 
Walter  Ogilvie  of  Lintrathan,  predecessor  to  the  Earl  of  Airly,  now  chief  of  that 
name,  who  cai-ries  only  the  plain  coat  of  Ogilvie. 

Walter.  Ogilvie  of  Banff  gets  a  charter  from  George  Earl  of  Huntly,  (and  is 
thirein  designed  Armiger  noster)  of  the  lands  of  Auchannachy,  in  the  forestry  of 
Boyne,  anno  1491,  and  confirmed  by  King  James  IV.,  having  married  one  of  the 
co-heiresses  of  Home  of  Ayton,  carries,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  Ogilvie;  second 
and  third  argent,  three  papingoes  vert. 

Sir  William  Forbes  of  Pitsligo,  son  to  Sir  John  Forbes  Lord  Forbes,  in  the  reign 
of  King  Robert  III.  married  Margaret  Fraser,  only  daughter  of  Sir  William  Eraser 
of  Philorth,  and  his.  wife  Agnes  Douglas,  a  lady  of  the  family  of  the  Douglasses ;. 
by  her  he  got  the  barony  of  Pitsligo,  whereupon  that  tamily  have  been  in  use  to 
quarter  the  coat  of  Fraser  with  their  owm.  This  family  was  dignified  with  the 
title  of  Lord  by  King  Charles  I.  anno  1633. 

Forbes  of  Tolquhon,  in  Buchan,  a  younger  son  of  Forbes  Lord  Forbes,  for  mar- 
rying the  daughter  and  heir  of  Sir  Henry  Preston  of  Formartin,  quarters  the  arms 
of  Preston,  argent,  three  unicorns'  heads  erased  sable,  with  their  own  :  And,  upon 
the  same  account,  Forbes  of  Riras,  for  marrying  one  of  the  daughters  and  co- 
heiresses of  Wemyss  of  Rires,  quartered  the  arms  of  Rires  with  the  arms  of 
Forbes. 

I  think  I  have  given  a  sufTicient  number  of  examples  of  arms  of  alliances.  All 
the  quartered  arms  that  I  have  met  with  belonging  to  Scots  families,  do  not  exceed 
six  difterent  coats  of  arms,  which  are  marshalled  after  these  three  ways,  plain  quar- 
tering, quartering,  counter-quartering,  of  which  I  have  given  examples  with  their 
surtouts,  or  inescutcheons.  With  other  nations,  especially  the  Germans,  we  will 
find  thirty  or  forty  diiferent  coats  of  arms  marshalled  altogether  in  one  shield  ;  of 
whose  various  dispositions  and  methods  of  marshalling  I  have  treated  elsewhere, 
and  shall  speak  of  them  afterwards:  But,  first,  I  go  on  with  the  other  causes  of 
marshalling  many  coats  of  arms  in. one  shield.. 


OF  ADOPTION  AND  SUBSTITUTION 

As  THERE  are  many  causes  and  occasions  of  obtaining  at  first  a  coat  of 
arms,  so  are  there  several  causes  and  ways  of  augmenting  them,  by  marshalling 
others  with  them  in  one  shield,  as  o^ces  and  alliances,  of  which  before;  and  I  pro- 
ceed to  others ;  and,  first,  of  adoption. 

Anciently  with  many  nations  there  was  a  custom,  when  the  last  person  of  a 
noble  house  died  withoat  issue  or  successors,  and  the   family  came  to  be  extinct. 

Vol.  II.  O 


54  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ^r. 

the  arms  thereof  were  buried  with  him  in  the  grave,  as  John  Baptista  Christyn,  in 
his  Juris prudentia  Heroica,  Art.  2.  "  Hinc  recte  institutum  est,  ut  ultimo  ejusdem 
"  famiUae  extinctae,  ipsa  insignia  cum  ipso  cadavere  inhumarentur;"  of  the  prac- 
tices of  which  formality  he  gives  several  instances  of  old,  and  of  late  in  Swedland ; 
and  the  reason  he  gives,  "  Ne  ignobiles  nobilium  deferant  arma,  familiasque  con- 
"  turbent,"  i.  e.  that  the  ignoble  should  not  assume  the  arms  of  an  extinct  fa- 
mily, lest  they  disturb  and  confuse  others  with  a  pretended  nobility. 

A  stranger,  or  ignoble  person,  according  to  our  author,  cannot  assume  the  arms 
of  an  extinct  family  without  the  consent  of  the  sovereign,  or  of  being  permitted  to 
carry  them  by  adoption,  contract  of  marriage,  testament,  or  other  valid  disposition 
from  those  of  the  said  extinct  families,  having  had  power  to  make  such  concessions. 
I  shall  here  add  the  second  article  about  the  same,  from  the  edict  of  Albert,  and 
Isabel  Infanta  of  Spain,  Archdukes  of  Austria,  and  Dukes  of  Burgundy,  published 
the  14th  December  1616,  from  the  French  copy.  "  We  discharge  all  our  subjects, 
"  and  the  inhabitants  of  the  countries  under  our  obedience,  of  what  quality  or 
"  condition  soever  they  be,  to  carry  or  engrave  the  name  or  arms  of  other  noble 
"  houses  or  families,  albeit  the  line  masculine  of  the  same  be  extinct,  saving  and 
"  excepting  the  gentlemen  to  whom  the  same  have  been  permitted  by  adoption, 
"  contract  of  marriage,  testament,  or  other  valid  disposition  from  those  of  the  said 
"  family,  having  power  to  make  such  concessions :  Or  those  who  carry  the  name 
"  and  arms  of  such  extinct  families,  have  from  us  obtained  express  consent,  and 
"  letters  patent  in  due  form,  and  caused  registrate  the  same  in  tlie  registers  of  our 
"  officers  of  arms,  as  shall  be  after  declared,  under  the  pain,  that  who  shall  do 
"  otherwise  shall  pay  the  fine  of  a  100  florins,  over  and  above  the  reparation  of 
"  what  shall  be  done  in  the  contrary." 

Amongst  the  many  ways  of  obtaining  arms,  of  augmenting,  multiplying  and 
changing  them,  is  adoption. 

Adoption,  then,  is  a  legal  act,  whereby  one  or  many  are  brought  into  a  family, 
as  lawyers  say,  "  Actus  legitimus  per  quern  quis  in  alienam  recipitur  familiam," 
invented  for  the  comfort  of  those  who  have  no  isue;  and  in  case  of  failing  of  one, 
others  are  substitute  to  succeed,  according  to  the  destination  of  the  adopter. 
Adoption  is  commonly  called  by  the  French,  adfiliation,  sic  adoptivi  vocantur  ad- 
filiati. 

It  is  a  great  comfort  and  solace  for  one  dying  without  issue,  to  have  the  beneiit 
of  a  law  or  custom,  to  adopt  other  of  his  own  kindred,  or  out  of  it,  to  perpetuate 
the  grandeur  of  his  family  in  his  name  and  arms,  lest  they  go  to  oblivion  in  the 
grave  v/ith  himself.  And,  as  the  custom  is  agreeable  to  nature,  so  is  it  of  a  very 
long  standing  :  For  Josephus,  in  his  History  of  the  Jews,  tells,  that  Abraham 
adopted  the  son  of  Aram,  his  wife's  full  brother,  before  she  had  a  son  :  And  the 
Scripture  tells  us,  that  the  daughter  of  Pharaoh  adopted  Moses,  and  Mordecai 
adopted  Esther,  the  daughter  of  his  uncle,  Esth.  chap.  ii.  ver.  7.  It  was  the  cus- 
tom alio  of  other  nations,  especially  with  the  Romans,  to  sdopt,  and  that  those 
whom  they  adopted  went  often  under  the  name  of  the  adopter.  Octavius  was 
called  Caesar,  from  Julius  Cssar  who  adopted  him.  Pomponius  Atticus  was  sur- 
named  Cecilius,  from  Q^  Cecilius  his  adoptive  father,  and  the  two  sons  of  Paulus 
^Smilius  adopted  by  Fabius  Maximus  and  Scipio  Africanus,  the  one  was  named 
Fabius  and  the  other  Scipio;  and  the  ensigns  of  the  adopters,  as  v^•ell  as  names, 
passed  from  the  adopters  to  those  they  adopted,  by  the  custom  of  the  Romans,  as 
that  golden  chain  or  collar  used  by  the  family  of  Torquati,  from  w  liich  they  had 
the  name  :  which  name  and  ensign  descended  to  their  posterity,  as  is  to  be  seen 
on  the  Roman  coins  ;  and  that  when  one  of  another  tribe  was  adopted  into  this 
family,  he  also  did  assume  that  badge  or  ensign  of  honour,  as  may  be  seen  in 
another  medal  relating  to  D.  Junius  Silanus,  sometime  Pr^tor  of  Macedonia,  who 
was  adopted  into  the  Manlian  family  of  the  Torquati ;  as  in  Ashmole's  Institu- 
tion, chap.  7.  sect.  6.  page  219.  And  these  adoptions  were  made  by  public 
authority,  and  many  ceremonies,  which  were  used  in  several  countries  according  to 
their  different  customs,  where  many  illustrious  persons  used  this  way  of  instituting 
and  naming  their  heirs  to  their  estates,  upon  condition  they  take  upon  them  the 
name  and  arms  of  their  families,  and  to  use  them  on  all  occasions  as  they  had 
been  their  lawful  begotten  children,  by  a  fiction  of  law.     As  Hoppingius  de  Jure 


OF  MARSHALUNG  ARMS,  iSc:  55 

Insignium,  par.  5.  speaking  of  adoption,  "  Quamvis  fictionein  inducat,  tameu 
"  quia  fictio  hasc  legis  est,  St  quidem  accommodata  ad, actum  favorabilein,  de  quo 
■'  ipsa  lex  disponere  posset,  dicenduni  vidctur,  hoc  perinde  habeii,  ac  si  vere  &- 
"  per  naturam,  nomen  et  insignia  ista  adoptatus  ferret."  So  the  adopted  may 
carry  the  name  and  arms,  as  if  they  were  their  own,  and  as  sons  by  nature.  Cas- 
san.  Cut.  G/or.  Aluud.  part  1st.  says,  "  Such  assumption  of  name  and  arms  may 
"  be  regularly  made  to  the  adopted,  when  there  is  no  heir  in  the  family,  nor  any 
"  other  that  can  pretend  right  to  the  name  and  arms  ;  but  if  otherwise,  the 
"  adopted  cannot  use  them  without  the  consent  of  all  those  in  the  family  who  have 
"  right  to  them."  Other  lawyers  are  of  the  first  opinion;  and  some  say,  that 
name  and  arms  alone  cannot  be  alienated,  except  the  adopter  and  disponer  give 
with  them  his  estate :  And  they  say,  "  Quod  multa  cum  universitate  transeunt, 
"  qua:  singulariter  per  se  prohibentur." 

By  the  general  custom  of  Europe,  he  who  has  no  children  may  give  away  hi.s 
estate  to  a  stranger,  upon  condition  that  he  carry  the  name  and  arms  of  the 
granter ;  as  Jurisprudential  Heroica,  "  Usu  tamen  obtinuit,  ut  qui  liberos  non  ha- 
"  bet,  possit  in  alium  transferre  feuda  sua  &  hereditatem,  ea  conditione,  ut  haeres 
"  ille,  sea  totaliter  adoptatus,  nomen  &  arma  ferat  adoptantis :  "  For  which  he 
gives  us  two  eminent  instances  ;  one  of  them  I  shall  here  add,  that  is  of  the  Prin- 
cipality of  Orange,  in  so  far,  that  he  that  is  prince  is  obliged  to  carry  the  arms  of 
-Chalon,  or  lose  the  pruicipality  ;  as  appears  by  the  testament  of  John  deChalon, 
first  Prince  of  0ii.vn"ge  of  that  family,  of  the  date  the  21st  of  October  1417  ;  as 
also  by  testament  of  William  Prince  of  Orange,  the  son  of  Lewis,  the  son  of  the 
foresaid  John,  1459  ;  also  by  the  testament  of  Johji  the  son  of  William,  dated  the 
6th  of  April  1 5^2  ;  also  by  a  testament  of  Philibert,  the  son  of  John,  in  the  year 
1520.  Which  ordinance  was  put  in  execution  by  Rene,  the  son  of  Henry  Count 
de  Nassau,  and  of  Dame  Clauda  de  Chalon,  who  leaving  the  name  and  arms  of 
Nassau,  retained  the  name  and  arms  of  Chalon;  and,  dying  without  issue  1544, 
with  permission  of  the  Emparor  Charles  V.  instituted  William  Count  of  Nassau, 
his  cousin-german.  Prince  of  Orange,  who  carried  his  arms  as  his  successors  have 
done,  quarterly,  fiist  azure,  seme  of  billets,  a  lion  rampant  or,  armed  and  langued 
gules,  for  Nassau  ;  second  or,  a  lion  rampant  gardant  gules,  (the  French  say  for  a 
lion  in  this  posture,  leopard  lioniie)  crowned,  armed,  and  langued  azure,  lor  Cat- 
zellenbogen  ;  third  gules,  a  fesse  argent,  for  Vianden  ;  fourth  gules,  two  huns 
passant  gardar.t,  or,  (the  French  call  them  leopards)  langued  and  armed  azure, 
for  Brunswick,  some  say  for  Dietz, ;  over  all,  by  way  of  an  escutcheon,  gules,  a 
bend  or,  for  Chalon,  quartered  with  or,  a  hunting-horn  azure,  mouthed,  ringed 
and  stringed ^a/^-j,  for  Orange:  which  arms  are  surcharged  with  cheque  of  nine 
points,  or  and  azure  ;  the  French  say  Stir  le  tout  du  tout,  cinque  points  cC  or,  equi- 
poles,  a  quct.re  cl'  azure,  for  Geneva. 

The  other  instance  our  author  gives  is  from  England,  of  the  family  of  the  name 
of  Percy,  whose  arms  were  sable,  a  chief  indented  or :  William  Lord  Percy  having 
only  a  daugiiter,  Agnes,  who  was  married  to  Joceline  de  Lovaine,  a  younger  son  of 
Godfred  Duke  of  Brabant,  who  carried  sable,  a  lion  rampant  or :  Lord  William 
Percy  adopted  his  son-in-law,  who  was  obliged  to  disuse  his  own  name  and  arms, 
and  carry  only  the  name  and  arms  of  Percy,,  which  he  and  his  issue  performed, 
tijl  the  practice  of  marshalling  many  arms  in  one  shield ;  Then  the  family  quar- 
tered the  arms  of  Joceline  de  Lovaine  with  those  of  the  name  of  Percy  :  And 
again,  Henry  Percy  Earl  of  Northumberland  married  the  sister  and  heires  of  An- 
thony Lord  Lucy,  for  his  second  wife,  and  got  with  her  a  great  estate,  but  she  had 
no  issue  to  him  ;  he,  with  his  lady's  consent,  gave  that  fortune  to  Henry  Percy 
surnamed  Hotspur,  a  son  of  a  former  marriage,  upon  condition  that  he  marshalled 
the  arms  of  Lucy,  being  gules,  three  lucy  fishes,  (/.  e.  pikes)  haurient  argent,  with 
his  own  ;  so  that  the  Earls  of  Northumberland  of  the  name  of  Percy  carried  after 
that,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  Joceline  de  Lovaine  ;  second  and  third  Lucy  ;  and 
in  an  inescutcheon,  by  way  of  surtout,  the  arms  of  Percy. 

Lawyers  tell  us  likewise.  That  when  the  adopter  and  the  person  adopted  are 
both  noble,  the  last  loses  nothing  of  his  native  nobility,  Dignitas  per  adoptionetn  ac-^ 
quiritur  vel  augetur,  non  minuitur. 


56  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ^c. 

If  the  adopter  be  ignoble  and  tlie  person  adopted  noble,  there  is  no  detriment  to. 
the  last,  who  still  keeps  the  nobility  of  his  blood,  Aioptio  mutat  gentem,  non  genus  : 
and  here  there  is  no  question  about  arms.     But, 

When  a  noble  person  adopts  an  ignoble  one,  the  question  is.  Whether  the  ignoble 
becomes  noble  by  adoption  ?  Hoppingius  de  Jure  Insignium,  cap.  7.  is  for  the  affir- 
mative ;  but  generally  all  lawyers  are  for  the  negative,  and  tell  us,  Nobilem  ex  ig- 
nobili  adoptio  non  facit  ;  and  that  the  ignoble  adopted  has  no  right  to  use  the  armo- 
rial ensigns  of  the  noble  adopter.  Sir  John  Feme,  in  his  Glory  of  Generosity, 
page  67.  says,  "  That  the  ignoble  cannot  succeed  more  to  the  honours  of  their 
"  adoptive  fathers,  than  bastards  to  their  fathers ; "  and  regrets  such  a  succession 
in  England,  where  many  of  a  base  and  ungentle  state,  as  adopted  sons,  do  inherit 
the  names,  possessions,  and  arms  of  their  adoptive  fathers,  whereof  some  are  in  the 
counties  of  Hampton,  Huntingdon,  and  Worcester. 

Adoption,  says  our  last  named  author,  is  an  alienation,  and  any  man  may  give 
away  his  estate  to  a  stranger  ;  but  his  arms,  the  ensigns  of  his  nobility,  he  can- 
not, so  long  as  any  of  his  kindred  are  ahve,  yea,  if  there  be  but  a  ba.stard 
remaining  capable  of  the  King's  legitimation  ;  as  in  his  forenamed  book,  page 
299. 

This  author  adds  three  observatiojis,  when  a  person  leaves  his  estate  to  another, 
upon  condition  to  use  his  name  and  arms.  "  First,  That  he  who  is  so  benefited 
"  and  enjoined  must  carry  both  name  and  arms,  and  so  fulfil  the  testament. 
"  Secondly,  If  the  heir,  a  stranger,  be  of  more  noble  blood  and  family  than  the 
"  adopter,  he  is  then  not  obliged  by  the  testament  to  disuse  his  own  name  and 
"  arms,  but  may  quarter  the  arms  of  the  disponer,  if  he  pleases,  after  his  own. 
"  And  thirdly.  If  the  heir  be  of  inferior  blood  and  dignity,  he  is  obliged  to  leave 
"  his  own  name  altogether,  as  also  his  proper  arms,  except  he  marshal  them  after 
"  the  adopter  or  disponer's  arms." 

By  our  law  we  have  no  formal  adoption,  to  speak  properly,  but  materially,  the 
same  way  of  conveying  of  estates  and  possessions  to  strangers  and  others,  who 
could  not  have  otherwise  succeeded  but  by  alienation  and  disposition,  with  consent 
of  authority,  especially  as  to  conveying  of  honours :  which  way  I  take  for  a  kind' 
of  adoption,  and  call  the  arnrs  of  such  persons  who  enjoy  the  estate,  name,  and, 
arms  of  others  so  disponed  to  them,  Anns  of  Adoption,  to  distinguish  them  immAiins 
of  Alliances,  treated  of  in  the  former  title,  which  the  bearers,  as  general  heirs 
to  them,  may  carry  or  not  carry  as  they  please :  but  here  those  who  obtain  estates 
by  this  way  of  adoption,  are  obliged,  by  the  destination  of  the  disponer,  to  carry 
his  name  and  arms,  or  to  marshal  them  with  his  own.  What  the  learned  Sir 
George  Mackenzie  says,  as  to  this  point,  in  his  Science  of  Heraldry,  page  80,  I 
shall  here  add  :  "  That  the  learnedest  antiquaries  and  lawyers  conclude,  that  when  a 
"  person  leaves  his  estate  to  another,  upon  condition  that  he  shall  bear  the  disponer's 
"  name  and  arms,  he  who  is  to  succeed  is  not  by  condition  obliged  to  lay  aside  his 
"  own  name  and  arms,  but  may  quarter  his  own  arms  with  those  of  the  disponer, 
"  except  the  disponer  do,  in  the  institution,  prohibit  the  bearing  of  any  arms  be-. 
"  sides  his  own,  and  the  heir,  in  marshalling  his  own  and  the  disponer's  arms,  may 
"  use  what  order  he  pleases,  by  giving  the  first  quarter  either  to  his  own  or  to  the 
"  disponer's,  except  the  contrary  be  expressed  in  the  institution." 

It  is  evident  then,  that  adoption,  and  such  way  of  leaving  estates  behind  them, 
may  be  said  to  have  been  the  cause  not  only  of  disusing  arms,  by  carrying  those 
only  of  the  adopter  or  disponer,  but  also  of  marshalling  or  quartering  the  heirs'  arms- 
with  those  of  the  adopter's  or  disponer's,  whether  of  kindied  or  strangers. 

Some  have  relinquished  both  their  name  and  arms,  and  only  used  those  of  the 
adopter's  or  disponer's,  altogether  strangers  to  one  another;  as  of  late  with  us 
John  Biggar  of  Woolmet,  nominate  as  his  heir,  Wallace,  a  nephew  of  Sir  Thomas 
Wallace  of  Craigie,  sometime  one  of  the  Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice,  to 
succeed  him  in  his  estate  of  Wolmet,  upon  condition  that  he  use  only  the  name 
and  arms  of  Biggar  of  Woolmet,  which  he  and  his  successors  continue  to  do  ;  the 
arms  being  argent,  a  bend  azure,  betwixt  two  mullets  gu/es. 

The  same  way  Ranken  of  Orchard-head,  who  carried  gules,  three  boars'  heads 
erased  argent,  betwixt  a  lance  issuing  out  of  the  dexter  base,  and  a  lochaber-axe 
issuing  out  of  the  sinister,  both  erected  in  pale  of  the  last,  was  obliged  to  leave  his 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  bV.  57 

name  and  arms,  and  use  only,  as  heir  adaptive  of  Little  of  Over-Libberton,  Lis 
name  and  arms,  being  sable,  a  saltier  ingrailed  argent,  though  he  was  near  of  kin  to 
Little  of  Libberton. 

Sir  William  Ballenden  of  Broughton,  Treasurer-depute  in  the  reign  of  King 
Charles  IL  and  thereafter  Lord  Ballexden,  having  been  unmanied,  parsed  by  his 
sister's  son  David  Lord  Cardross,  and  adopted  John  Ker.,  younger  son  of  WilUain 
Earl  of  Roxburgh,  and  settled  his  estate  upon  him,  and  got  tiie  title  of  honour 
conveyed  to  him  ;  and  accordingly,  upon  the  Lord  Ballenden's  death  anno  1670, 
Mr  Ker,  as  his  adopted  heir,  did  succeed  him,  and  wore  his  coat  of  arm>,  without 
any  mixture  or  addition  of  his  own  paternal  bearing,  according  to  the  destination, 
being  guhs,  a  hart's  head  couped,  between  three  cross  croslets,  all  w  ithin  a  double 
tressure,  couater-flowered  with  flower-de-luces  or  ;  and  got  likewise  his  heritable 
office  of  U^her  to  the  Exchequer,  which  he  officiate  by  a  depute. 

Sir  John  Maxwell  of  Pollock,  having  no  issue  of  his  body,  passed  by  his  sister 
the  Lady  Kelburn,  in  the  succession  of  his  estate,  and  adopted  Mr  Geokge  A'L^x- 
v.'ell,  younger  of  Auldhouse,  and  accordingly  put  him  in  the  fee  of  his  estate  in 
his  own  lifetime,  whose  son  is  the  present  Sir  John  Maxwell  of  Pollock,  one  of  the 
Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice,  (and  sometime  Lord  Justice-Clerk),  carries 
argent,  on  a  saltier  sable,  an  annulet  or,  stoned  azure ;  of  whom  before  in  the 
First  Part  of  this  System. 

William  Cochran  of  that  Ilk,  having  but  one  daughter,  he  married  her  to 
Alexander  Blair,  son  of  John  Blair  of  that  Ilk,  and  in  so  much  adopted  him, 
that  he  was  de-igned  Cochran  in  the  lifetime  of  his  father-in-law,  and  carried  the 
arms  of  Cochran,  and  not  those  of  Blair  ;  as  did  his  issue  the  Earls  of  Dundonald  ; 
of  which  in  the  First  Part  of  this  System. 

Hugh  Montgomery  Earl  of  Eglinton,  who  died  without  any  issue  anno  161 2, 
had  passed  by  his  own  nearest  heir-male  of  the  House  of  Montgomery,  and  settled 
his  estate  upon  his  cousin-german,  Alexander  Seaton,  son  of  Robert  first  Earl  of 
Winton,  and  his  Lady  Margaret  Montgomery,  daughter  of  Hugh  Earl  of  Eglin- 
ton, aunt  of  the  last  Earl,  who  accordingly  succeeded  ;  and,  as  he  was  obhged  by 
the  Earl  of  Eglinton's  destination,  assumed  the  name  and  arms  of  Montgomery, 
which  were  then,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  azure,  three  flower-de-luces  or,  for 
Montgomery;  second  and  third  j^wVj-,  three  annulets  sr,  stoned  azure,  for  Eglin- 
ton. IMr  Alexander  Seaton,  who  was  adopted  into  the  family,  left  his  own  name 
for  that  of  Montgomery,  and  carried  the  above  arms,  and  placed  over  them  an  in- 
escutcheon  of  the  arms  of  his  father,  viz.  cr,  three  crescents  within  a  double  trcs- 
sure,  counter-flowered  ^a/c-j-,  which  are  painted  in  a  room  in  the  house  of  Seaton: 
But  though  Montgomery  Earl  of  Eglinton  could  dispose  of  his  estate  as  he  had  a 
mind,  yet  he  could  not  make  over  his  honours  to  Mr  Alexander  Seaton  ;  and 
therefore  it  was  sometime  before  King  James  VI.  was  prevailed  on  to  confirm  to 
him  the  titles  of  Earl  of  Eglinton  and  Lord.  Montgomery,  which  was  at  last  done 
by  the  intercession  of  the  Queen,  upon  Mr  Alexander  Seaton's  marrying  Lady  Anne 
Livingston,  daughter  to  Alexander  Earl  of  Linlithgow,  who  was  one  of  the  Queen's 
Maids  of  Honour,  and  the  titles  of  honour  and  precedency  of  the  Earls  of  Eglinton 
were  confirmed  to  him,  of  whom  is  lineally  descended  the  present  Earl  of  Eg- 
linton :  The  inescutcheon  with  the  arms  of  Seaton  above  mentioned,  was  dis- 
used, and  the  arms  of  the  family  were  then  marshalled  as  now,  carried  thus ; 
quarterly,  first  and  fourth  Montgomery  ;  second  and  third  Eglinton  ;  all  within 
a  bordure  or,  charged  with  a  double  tressure  counter-flowered  ^//A'j-.  See  more  of 
this  in  the  first  volume  of  this  Treatise  of  Heraldry,  page  375. 

Since  1  am  speaking  here  of  several  ways  and  means  of  acquiring  arms,  and 
augmenting  them,  and  since  they  are  acquired  by  privileges,  contracts,  and  dispo- 
sitions, I  shall  not  altogether  omit,  but  briefly  speak  of,  these  two  ways  following, 
yiz.  Prescription,  &c. 


prescription,  custo.m,  .and  statute,  of  certain  pl.aces. 

These  have  not  only  given  new  arms  at  first,  but  have  been  means  of  augment- 
ing and  marshalling  them  with  others ;  for  these  things  which  are   acquired  by 
Vol.  IL  P 


58  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  i^c. 

concessions,  privileges,  and  contracts,  can  be  Required  hy  Ptrscnptiou;  as  Hop- 
pingius,  paragraph  2.  "  Quse  enim  privilegio  sive  pacto  acquiri  possunt,  ea  etiam 
"  pr^scriptione  acquiruntur ;"  and  again,  N.  223.  "  Concessibile  quod  est  per 
"  principem,  etiam  prsescriptibile  est." 

The  time  allowed  by  our  author  to  complete  Prescription  of  arms,  is  to  be  dis- 
t^^gui^bed;  if  the  arms  be  used  without  the  knowledge  of  authority,  then  time 
immemorial  is  required ;  but  if  exposed  to  public  view,  and  known  to  authority, 
not  interrupting  them,  then  forty  years  time  gives  a  right  to  them. 

Nobility  itself  is  acquired  by  immemorable  prescription,  much  more  the  right  of 
using  arms  in  such  a  long  time,  "  Cujus  confrarii  non  extat  memoria,  acquiri  et 
"  prsEscribi  posse  sine  titulo;"  as  also  the  regalia,  parts  of  the  sovereign  authori- 
ty, in  such  a  time  are  prescribable,  as  our  author,  "  Regalia  majora,  aeque  ac 
"  minora,  indistincte  immemorabili  praescriptione  acquiruntur,"  Ibid.  N  222. 
where  he  tells.  That  a  bastard  has  no  right  to  disuse  his  mark  of  illegitimation 
under  the  prescription  of  forty  years. 

Sir  George  Mackenzie,  in  his  Science  of  Heraldry,  page  12.  says,  "  By  our  law, 
"  where  prescription  is  not  allowed,  except  in  the  cases  wherein  it  is  introduced 
"  by  a  special  and  express  statute,  it  is  probable  that  prescription  might  well  have 
"  defended  the  using  of  arms  before  the  125th  act.  Pari.  12.  James  VL  But  since 
"  that  time  it  should  not,  seeing  the  act  ordains  all  arms  to  be  matriculate  in  the 
"  Lyon's  books  and  registers." 

I  think  it  very  hard  that  a  person  cannot  by  right,  /«r^  antecessorio,  carry  the 
arms  which  his  progenitors  used,  legally  perhaps,  the  authority  and  warrant 
being  lost  through  time ;  more  especially  when  accounts  of  them  were  so  indif- 
ferently taken  and  kept  by  our  provincial  heralds,  and  in  latter  times  as  indifferently 
preserved. 

By  the  customs  and  statutes  of  certain  countries  or  cities,  arms  are  acquired ; 
because  a  certain  nobility  is  acquired  by  the  same  there,  and  arms  necessarily  fol- 
low :  as  our  author,  "  Consuetudines  &-  statuta  insignia  tribuere  ;  ratio,  nobilitas 
"  enim,  pro  cujusque  loci  consuetudine,  et  statuta  inducitur  et  asstimatur :"  But 
this  is  only  a  nobihty  at  home,  according  to  the  customs  and  statutes  of  the  place, 
c&WtA  Nobilitas  secundum  quid,  and  not  a  general  and  true  nobility' in  all  places; 
because  it  is  not  according  to  the  laws  and  customs  of  nations,  and  their  arms  can- 
not be  received  without  the  consent  and  approbation  of  the  sovereign,  whose  sub- 
jects they  are  :  But  more  of  this  in  another  place. 


OF   PATRONAGE. 

Arms  of  patronage  are  these  of  patrons  and  superiors,  carried  in  part  or  in 
whole  by  their  clients  and  vassals,  to  show  their  dependence. 

They'formed  of  old  their  arms  after  those  of  their  patrons  and  over-lords,  or  took 
a  part  of  them  to  compose  or  quarter  with  their  own,  as  soon  as  these  ways  became 
fashionable. 

In  many  shires  of  our  kingdom  where  our  ancient  earls,  lords,  and  great  men,  had 
been  patrons  and  superiors,  there  we  find  their  armorial  figures  more  frequent  than 
others  in  the  bearings  of  many  of  the  present  nobility  and  gentry,  which  show 
their  progenitors  to  have  been  clients  and  vassals  to  them,  though  now  living  in 
other  shires,  to  have  been  originally  from  such  shires,  where  such  figures  do  pre- 
dominate, as  in  Annandale,  where  the  ancient  Lords  of  Annan  dwelt,  carried  a 
saltier  and  chief:  There  the  Bruces,  Murrays,  Johnstons,  Jardines,  Kilpatricks,  and 
several  others,  carry  such  figures  of  different  tinctures  accompanied  with  other 
figures,  to  distinguish  themselves  from  one  another.  In  Douglasdale  and  other 
countries  which  the  Douglasses  possessed  in  property  or  superiority,  there  many 
old  families  have  stars.  And  in  Fifeshire  hons  are  carried  upon  account  the  lion 
was  the  armorial  figure  of  the  M'DufFs  Earls  and  over-lords  of  Fife;  and  in  Angus, 
lions,  upon  the  account  of  their  old  earls.  And  in  those  shires  where  the  Stewarts 
of  old  had  interest,  many  families  have  their  figures  chequered,  from  the  Stewarts' 
fesse  cheque,  which  they  have  been  in  use  to  carry  upon  the  account  of  patronage, 
as  Ross  Lord  Ross,  Semple  Lord  Semple,  Houston  of  that  Ilk,  Brisbane  of  Bishop- 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  'iJc. 


59 


ton,  Hall  of  Fulbar,  Fleming  of  Barrochin,  Shaw  of  Bargarran,  and  those  of  the 
name  of  Spmel,  with  several  others,  whose  possessions  were  in  the  shire  of  Renfiew, 
and  other  countries  belonging  to  t!ie  Stewarts,  where  figures  chequered  are  pre- 
sumed to  be  or.gmaliy  so  earned,  upon  the  account  of  patronage;  and  tiie  same  I 
observe  in  many  oiher  shires  with  us;  and  the  same  practice  was  anciently  used  in 
England. 

Camden,  in  his  Remains  of  Biitain,  page  iiS.  says,  "  Gentlemen  began  to  bear 
"  arms,  of  whom  they  held  in  lee,  or  to  whom  they  were  most  devoted;  so,  wheie- 
"  as  the  Earl  of  Chester  bare  garbs,  (wheat  sheaves)  many  gentlemen  of  that 
"  country  took  wheat  sheaves.  Whereas  the  old  Earl  of  \Varwick.  bare  cbcqiic,  or  and 
"  azure,  a  cheveron  ermine,  many  thereabout  took  crintne  and  cheque.  In  Leices- 
"  ter  and  the  country  confining,  divers  bare  cinquefoils;  for  that  the  ancient  Earls 
"  Leicester  bore  gules,  a  cinque  foil  ermine;  from  which  the  family  of  Hamilton 
"  with  us,  who  carry  the  same.  In  Cumberland  and  thereabout,  where  the  old 
"  Barons  of  Jvendal  bare  argent,  two  bars  gules,  a  lion  passant  or,  in  a  canton  of 
"  the  second ;  many  gentlemen  thereabout  took  the  same,  in  diiferent  colours  and 
"  charges  in  the  canton." 

The  gentleman  wlw  wrote  the  introduction  to  the  sixth  edition  of  Guillim's 
Display  of  Heraldry,  gives  a  handsome  account  of  the  Rise,  Nature,  and  Progress 
of  Arms,  where,  page  7.  he  citeth  Camden,  as  I  have  done;  and  tells  us,  "  That 
"  there  is  no  one  acquainted  in  the  History  of  England  but  knows,  that,  of  old, 
"  most  of  the  great  estates  and  commands  of  that  kingdom  were  in  the  hands  of 
"  such  families  of  the  conqueror  and  his  issue  as  they  granted  them  to,  who,  by 
"  tenure,  in  their  persons,  and  with  their  tenants,  servants  and  dependants,  were  to 
"  attend  their  sovereigns  in  their  wars.  These  great  men  granted  parts  of  their 
"  tenures  to  persons  either  related  to  them  by  match,  service,  or  affection,  upon 
"  such  terms  as  they  themselves  either  were  obliged  to  the  first  granter  of  them, 
"  or  else  on  other  conditions  of  advantage  to  them;  giving  them  also  coat-ar- 
"  mour,  which  were  usually  parts  of  their  own,  with  the  differences  as  best  pleased 
"  them:  Thus,  among  others  that  bore  arms  by  this  bounty  of  lords,  &c.  or  ac- 
"  cording  to  Mr  Camden's  expression,  by  borrowing  from  their  lords'  arms,  were 
"  many  of  the  principal  gentry  of  England."  And  so  our  author  goes  on  with 
several  instances  more  than  I  have  given  above;  and  then  tells  us,  "  That  now 
"  touching  the  granting  of  arms  from  some  great  earls,  and  passing  of  coats  from 
"  one  private  person  to  another,  which  also  was  matter  sometimes  acted  before  the 
"  reductions  of  the  heralds  under  one  regulation,  the  following  precedents  which  I 
"  take,  says  he,  from  the  learned  Mr  Camden,  may  not  be  impertinent:"  And  so 
this  gentleman  gives  us  seven  proper  instances;  the  last  of  which  I  shall  here 
add  in  his  own  words. 

"  Another  example  of  the  like  nature  with  the  former  is,  from  a  grant  of  arras 
"  from  Barton  to  Booth,  which  you  now  have  in  the  family  of  Booth,  from 
"  whence  ttie  Right  Honourable  the  present  Earl  of  Warrington  is  descended. 
'•  Their  arms  were,  anciently,  a  cheveron  ingrailed,  and  a  canton  charged  with  a 
"  mullet ;  as  appears  by  a  charter  of  Thomas  del  Booth,  bearing  date  4  5d  Edward  III. 
"  but  at  presen:,  argent,  three  boars'  heads  erased  and  erected  sable;  which  coat 
"  was  the  ancient  arms  of  the  Bartons  of  Barton  in  Com.  Lan.  And  granted  to 
"  John,  the  son  of  Thomas  Booth  of  Barton^  per  chartnm  Thomce  Barton  de  Barton 
"  Prxdict.  anno  5.  Hen.  IV.  1404." 

Our  author  here  does  not  tell  upon  what  account  arms  were  thus  transmit- 
ted from  one  to  another,  whether  upon  account  of  alliance,  adoption,  or  feudal 
right,  8tc.  but  merely,  as  I  take  it,  that  as  great  men  could  give  their  arms  to 
whom  they  pleased  without  consent  of  the  sovereign  or  his  heralds;  so  that  there 
could  be  no  regulation  about  that  time  of  marks  of  nobility  in  England.  But  our 
author  proceds:  "  Though  it  was  usual  for  great  men,  both  of  the  clergy  and 
"  laity,  to  give  arms  and  titles,  with  places  of  dignity,  to  inferior  gentry,  or  lesser 
"  nobility,  who  did  acquire  arms  at  that  time,  and  did  gain  them  by  that  means: 
"  yet  Mr  Camden  informs  us,  that  in  this  and  succeeding  ages,  at  every  expedi- 
"  tion,  such  as  were  gentlemen  of  blood  would  repair  to  the  Earl  Marischal,  and 
"  by  his  authority  take  coats  of  arms,  which  were  registered  always  by  officers  of 
"  arras  in  the  rolls  of  arms  made  at  every  service,  whereof  many  yet  remain. 


6o  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  Wr. 

"  (sayelli  Camden)  us  that  of  the  siege  of  Carlaverock,  the  battle  of  Stirling,  the 
"  siege  of  Calais,  and  divers  tournaments." 

In  Italy  and  Spain  the  practice  of  marshalling  the  arms  of  patrons  or  over-lords 
with  those  of  their  clients  and  vassals,  has  been  anciently  very  much  in  use;  as 
Menestrier  tells  us,  "  That  in  Piacenza,  the  four  principal  families  there,  viz. 
"  Anguini,  Fontani,  Landi,  and  Scoti,  had  their  arms  impaled  on  the  right  side,  as 
"  coats  of  patronage,  with  those  of  other  families  in  that  country  and  city,  who 
"  associated  and  subjected  themselves  as  vassals  and  clients  to  one  or  other  of  those 
"  above-named  four  principal  families." 

The  book  entitled  Jeu  des  Armories  des  Soveraigns  et  Estats  d'Europe  gives  us 
the  blazon,  and  the  reason  of  the  armorial  bearing  of  the  Duke  of  Modena  and 
Ferrara,  thus  blazoned  by  the  French,  tierce  in  pale,  first  or,  a  double  eagle 
displayed  suble,  beaked,  membred,  and  crowned  gules,  (the  armorial  figure  of  the 
empire,  because  that  prince  is  under  its  protection)  oiipe  with  azure,  three  flower- 
de-luces  or,  for  France,  within  a  bordure  double  indented,  or  and  gules,  for  Fer- 
rara, (Nicolas  Lord  of  Ferrara  came  under  the  protection  of  Charles  Vll.  of 
France) ;  second  gules,  two  keys  placed  in  saltier,  adosse,  or  and  argent,  lie  azure,, 
and  in  chief  the  papal  tiara,  (upon  the  account  that  Ferrara  is  a  vicarage  of  tlie 
See  of  Rome)  and  over  the  keys  an  escutcheon  azure,  charged  with  an  eagle  dis- 
played argent,  crowned,  beaked,  and  membred  or,  for  the  Marquisate  of  Este; 
third  France,  within  the  boidure  of  Ferrara,  coupe  with  the  empire,  as  before. 
These  arms  would,  with  us,  be  blazoned  thus,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  tlie  em- 
pire; second  and  third  France,  within  a  bordure  double  indented,  or  and  gules\ 
and  over  all,  a  pale,  charged  with  the  papal  ensigns,  and  surmounted  with  an 
escutcheon  of  Este. 

Cardinals  have  been  in  use  to  add  to  their  paternal  bearings,  the  paternal  arms  of 
the  popes  or  other  princes,  by  whose  means  they  have  attained  to  that  dignity,  and 
were  called  arms  of  patronage. 

The  Kings  of  Sicily  and  Arragon  quartered  with  their  own  the  arms  of  the  fa- 
mily of  Suabia,  as  arms  of  patronage;  as  did  also  the  Dukes  of  Parma,  and  the 
Princes  of  Mirandula,  the  arms  of  other  potentates ;  of  which  in  another  place. 


GRATITUDE  AND  AFFECTION 

Are  observed  by  some  heralds  to  be  the  cause  of  marshalling  several  coats  of 
amis  in  one  shield  :  of  which  there  are  but  few  instances  to  be  found  with  us. 

The  arms  of  the  benefactor  are  sometimes  found  quartered  with  those  of  the 
beneficiary,  upon  the  account  of  gratitude. 

The  double  tressure  flowered  within  and  without  with  flower-de-luces,  the  ar- 
morial figures  of  France,  granted  by  Charlemagne  to  Achaius  King  of  Scotland, 
and  after  confirmed  by  many  Kings  of  France  to  those  of  ScotLmd,  and  car- 
ried by  them  as  a  figure  of  gratitude  and  aflection,  to  perpetuate  the  ancient 
and  memorable  league,  the  mutual  friendship  and  assistance  betwixt  those  kings 
and  their  subjects;  which  figure  is  still  continued  by  their  successors  Kings  of 
Great  Britain,  as  one  of  the  fixed  and  proper  figures  of  the  imperial  ensign  of  Scot- 
land. 

Such  other  figures  of  gratitude  and  affection  have  been  near  these  6oo  years 
carried  in  the  armorial  ensigns  of  the  Dukes  of  Brunswick  ;  as  Hoppingius  tells  us 
in  his  Treatise  de  Jure  Insigninm,  cap.  87.  page  308.  "  De  vaiiis  acquirendi  in- 
•■  signia  modis,"  viz.  That  when  Henry  Duke  of  Brunswick,  came  to  England  to 
visit  his  ally  Henry  II.  of  that  kingdom,  who  then  carried  for  arms,  gules,  five 
leopards  or.  King  Henry  gave  two  of  them  to  be  carried  by  his  friend  the  Duke ; 
which  figures  have  been  constantly  carried  by  his  successors :  For  which  our 
author  cites  an  ancient  author,  John  Bangen  Thuringisch,  in  anno  Christi  11^^, 
page  58.  "  Refert,  Ricardum  Anglix  regem  quinque  aureos  leopardos  insignium 
*'  loco  detuhsse,  ac  veniente  ad  eum  affine  suo  Henrico  Brunsuicensium  duce, 
"  duos  clypeo  leopardos  detraxisse,  illique  donasse  ;"  which  are  now  marshalled 
with  other  figures  in  the  fourth  quarter  of  the  royal  achievement  of  George,  no\v 
King  of  Great  Britain;  of  whose  arms  I  shall  be  more  particular  afterwards. 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ef^.  6i 

Anciently  it  was  a  great  sign  of  affection  and  kindness,  for  princes  to  grant  to 
other  princes  parts  of  their  imperial  ensigns,  which  was  not  allowed  even  to  their 
lawful  issue,  as  I  observed  before  in  the  chapter  of  Marks  of  Cadency. 

Menestrier  tells  us,  that  the  Prince  of  Antioch  addressing  himself  to  Lewis  XL 
of  France,  for  supply  to  recover  his  dominions  out  of  the  hands  of  the  infidels, 
was  courteously  received  by  that  king,  who  supplied  him  with  all  thmgs  necessary 
for  the  recovering  of  his  principality,  for  which  he  quartered  the  arms  of  France, 
(which  could  not  be  without  consent  of  the  king)  as  a  sign,  of  grateful  acknow- 
ledgment, with  his  own. 

The  arms  of  the  Boyles  of  England,  I  may  call  them  arms  of  affection;  because 
David  Earl  of  Glasgow  quarters  the;n  with  his  own,  upon  the  account  of  affection 
to  Royle  Earl  of  Burlington,  and  other  branches  of  that  name  in  England,  who 
acknowledge  their  descent  from  his  family  in  Scotland,  which  is  of  an  old  standing 
in  the  sheriffdom  of  Ayr:  In  the  reign  of  Alexander  111.  they  possessed  the  lands 
of  Kelburn ;  for,  in  charters  about  that  time,  mention  is  made  of  Ricnrdus  Boyl 
Domimis  ck  Kaulbunu  i-  e.  Kelburn,  and  WaUerus  Cummin  Domiiuis  de  Rougallen,  i.  c. 
Rowallen ;  as  in  the  evidences  of  the  charter-chest  of  Rowallen. 

Hugo  Boyle,  in  1399,  makes  a  mortification  to  the  monks  of  Paisley  for  the 
welfare  of  his  soul.  This  family  continued  down  in  a  direct  male  line  till  the 
reign  of  King  Charles  I.  that  John  Boyle  of  Kelburn,  having  no  male  issue,  mar- 
ried his  only  daughter  and  heir,  Grissel  Boyle,  to  David  Boyle  of  Halkshill,  a 
cadet  of  his  own  family,  his  great-grandfather  being  a  brother  of  it,  whose  grand- 
child David  Boyle  of  Kelburn  was  created  Earl  of  Glasgow,  Viscount  of  Kel- 
burn, Lord  Boyle  of  Stewarton,  and  carries,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  or,  an 
eagle  displayed  gules,  as  a  coat  of  augmentation,  upon  his  creation  as  Earl,  being 
formerly  the  crest  of  his  family;  second  and  third  parted  per  bend  crenelle,  argent 
and  gules,  for  the  surname  of  Boyle  in  England,  as  a  coat  of  affection;  and  over  all 
an  inescutcheon  or,  three  harts'  horns  gules,  the  paternal  coat  of  Boyle  of  Kelburn, 
as  is  to  be  seen  in  the  plates- of  the  First  Volume  of  this  Treatise. 


As  I  observed  before,  has  given  rise  to  many  armorial  figures,  in  the  several' 
crusades,  holy  expeditions  for  the  recovery  of  Jerusalem,  and  the  Holy  Land,  from 
the  Saracens,  as  c^w/w  of  divers  forms,  allerions,  martlets,  palms,  escalops,  piles,  &c. 
which  are  frequently  borrie  in  arms.  But  as  for  entire  coats  quartered  with  others, 
merely  upon  account  of  rehgion,  I  find  but  few  instances,  the  custom  of  quarter- 
ing many  coats  of  arms  in  one  shield  not  being  generally  so  old  as  the  crusades. 
However,  I  have  mentioned  religion  as  one  of  the  causes  of  mai'shalling,  because 
churchmen  are  in  use  to  quarter  the  ensigns  of  their  high  offices  (as  pitron  saints, 
and  other  holy  relics)  upon  accoiuit  of  devotion,  with  their  own  arms ;  which 
knights  also  of  rehgious  orders  also  were  in  use  to  do. 

Besides,  I  observe  kings  have  been  in  use  to  marshal  arms,  upon  account  of  re- 
ligion, with  their  own,  as  the  Kings  of  Hungary,  harry  of  six  pieces,  argent  and 
gules,  with  those  of  religion,  viz.  argent,  a  cross  patriarchal  gules,  standing  on  a 
mount  of  three  degrees  sinople;  which  cross  Stephen  King  of  Hungary  received 
from  Pope  Sylvester  II.  *^or  bringing  his  subjects  into  the  Christian  faith. 

Sandford,  in  his  History  of  England,  tells  us,  that  King  Richard  II.  having 
chosen  King  Edward  the  Confessor  for  his  patron  saint,  impaled  that  holy  king's 
arms,  being  azure,  a  cross  fleury  betvveen  five  martlets  or,  in  the  first  place,  with 
those  of  his  own  in  the  second,  being  France  and  England,  quarterly. 

His  grandfather  King  Edward  HI.  made  choice  of  several  patrons,  as  Ashmole 
tells  us,  the  Holy  Trinity,  the  Virgin  Mary,  whose  figure  he  and  his  Knights- 
Companions  wore  on  the  right  shoulder  on  their  habits  for  some  time;  Sr  George 
of  Cappadocia,  a  martyr,  his  ensign,  argent,  a  cross  gules,  and  St  Edward  the  Con- 
fessor, sometime  King  of  England,  his  arms  as  just  now  blazoned,  under  whose 
protection  himself  and  all  the  Knights-Companions,  together  with  the  affairs  of 
the  Order,  might  be  defended,  conserved,  and  governed  ;  as  is  evident,  says  our 
author,  by  the  charter  of  foundation  of  Windsor  College,  granted  by  that  king : 

Vol.  U.  Q^ 


62  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  Sic. 

and  that  the  two  last  were  his  special  patron  saints  whom  he  invoked  in  his  cry  ot 
war.  Thomas  Walsingham,  in  his  History  of  England,  page  159.  tells,  that  at  a 
skirmish  near  Calais,  in  1349,  King  Edward  seeing  his  soldiers  put  to  a  stand,  and 
like  to  be  worsted,  in  great  heat  of  anger,  drew  his  sword,  and  cried  out.  Ha  Si 
Edward.'  Ha  St  George.'  which  the  soldiers  hearing,  ran  presently  to  him  and 
gained  the  victory.  St  George  became  the  sole  patron  of  the  Order  of  the  Garter, 
and  from  him  it  was  called  Ordo  Divi  Sancti  Georgii,  and  the  Companions,  Eqidtes 
Georgiani;  and  that  saint's  picture  on  horseback,  with  a  shield  of  silver,  charged 
with  a  cross  gules,  became  the  badge  of  that  Order,  and  these  arms  were  advanced, 
both  by  land  and  sea,  on  the  English  standards. 

King.  Henry  VIIL  ordained  the  Great  Seal  of  that  Order  to  have  an  escutcheon 
with  the  arms  of  St  George  impaled  on  the  right  side,  with  the  quartered  arm's  of 
France  and  England,  ensigned  with  an  imperial  crown,  and  encircled  with  the 
garter;  which  seal  of  the  Order  so  formed  continued  till  the  reign  of  King  James  I. 
of  Great  Britain,  who  added  to  the  arms  of  France  and  England  those  of  Scotland 
and  Ireland. 

It  is  to  be  observed,  that  in  marshalling  of  arms,  those  of  religion,  and  of  patron 
faints,  take  place  before  other  arms,  and  even  those  of  dominion. 

Since  I  am  here  speaking  of  arms  upon  account  of  religion,  and  before  of  arms 
of  churchmen,  I  thought  it  not  far  out  of  my  road  to  add  a  paragraph  (showing 
that  in  England  arms  granted  to  the  clergy  ought  not  to  descend  to  their  children) 
from  a  discourse  of  the  duty  and  office  of  a  herald  of  arms,  written  by  Francis 
Thynne,  Lancaster  Herald,  3d  day  of  March  1605,  in  a  letter  to  a  peer,  taken 
from  the  Ashmolean  Library,  No.  S35,  and  printed  in  the  Supplement  to  Guil- 
lim's  Display,  the  sixth  edition. 

"  Arms  appointed  for  bishops  ought  not  to  descend  to  their  children,  for  they  are 
"  not  within  the  compass  of  the  law  of  arms,  which  only  takes  notice  of  bishops 
"  as  officers  of  the  church,  and  not  as  military  men,  or  persons  to  be  employed  m 
"  offices  or  affairs  of  laymen,  though  some  of  them  have  been  very  great  soldiers; 
"  for  both  canons  and  examples  do  forbid  the  same,  since  in  temporal  actions  in 
"  time  past  it  was  alleged  against  them.  For  it  was  objected  to  Hubert  Walter, 
"  Archbishop  of  Canterbury,  being  Chief-Justice  and  Chancellor  in  the  time  of 
"  King  John,  that  he  intermeddled  in  lay-causes,  and  dealt  in  blood.  As  also 
"  the  same  was  laid  against  other  clergymen  for  having  of  offices  in  the  exchequer, 
"  and  the  king's  house,  when  some  of  them  were  clerks  of  the  kitchen,  some 
"  treasurers  of  the  household,  &-c.:  yea,  so  much  did  our  ancestors  derogate  from 
"  the  arms  of  the  bishops,  as  that  the  bishops  which  were  interested  in  the  arms 
"  of  their  ancestors,  might  not  bear  the  arms  of  their  house,  without  some  no- 
"  torious  difference,  not  answerable  to  the  differences  of  ot'ner  younger  brethren; 
"  as  did  the  Bishop  of  Lincoln,  Henry  Burgensche,  the  Archbishop  of  Canterbury, 
•'  Thomas  Arundel,  the  Archbishop  of  York,  Richard  Scroop,  the  Bishop  of  Nor- 
"  wich,  Henry  Spencer,  and  many  others,  who  did  not  bear  the  common  differ- 
"  ences  of  arms  of  younger  sons,  but  great  and  notorious  differences,  as  bordures, 
"  some  ingrailed,  some  with  mitres,  or  such  like,  whereof  I  can  show  your  Lord- 
"  ship  many  forms.  And  that  it  was  not,  before  the  time  of  Bartolus,  the  lawyer, 
"  in  the  government  of  Charles  the  IV.  Emperor,  permitted  to  gown-men  (or  as 
"  the  French  termeth  them,  of  the  long  robe,  for  under  that  name  learned  men, 
"  clergymen,  and  others,  are  comprehended)  to  bear  armories.  Or  else  why  should 
"  that  great  lawyer  Bartolus  argue  the  matter,  Whether  it  were  convenient  that 
"  he  should  take  arms,  (the  peculiar  reward  and  honour  of  military  service  in  an- 
"  cient  time)  or  whether  lie  should  refuse  them  at  the  emperor's  hands?  For,  if  it 
"  had  been  then  used  that  the  long  robe  should  have  enjoyed  the  honour  of  arms, 
"  Bartolus  would  never  have  doubted  thereof.  But  since  it  was  not  then  accus- 
"  tomed,  he  made  question  whether  he  should  take  tho§e  arms  or  not ;  but  in  the 
"  end  concluded,  tliat  the  fact  of  the  prince  was  neither  to  be  disputed  nor  re- 
"  jected,  and  therefore  was  willing  to  assume  the  arms  the  emperor  had  given 
"  hiin."  I  shall  proceed  to  arms  gnmted  by  sovereigns  themselves,  or  their  heralds 
empowered  to  grant  them. 


OF  MARSHALUNG  ARMS,  LV.  63 


GENERAL  AND  SPECIAL  CONCESSIONS  OF  ARMS. 

Arms  are  the  proper  ensigns  of  nobility,  when  they  proceed  from  the  concessions: 
of  sovereigns,  or  their  principal  heralds  empowered  to  that  effect. 

Sovereign  princes,  who  acknowledge  no  superior,  without  doubt,  have  the  only 
right,  not  only  to  nobilitate  their  well-deserving  subjects  within  their  respective 
dominions,  but  to  give  them  arms  suitable  to  their  merit,  which  will  pass  for  en- 
signs of  nobility  in  all  kingdoms,  which  they  may  expose  to  show  their  honour ; 
as  Hoppingius,  "  Is  qui  insignia  a  suo  rege  vel  principe  meruit,  in  alterius  regis 
"  principisve  regno  deferre  possit." 

The  emperor,  kings,  the  pope,  and  even  independent  commonwealths,  are  in  use 
not  only  to  grant  arms  at  first  to  their  well-deserving  subjects,  but  after,  upon 
some  emergent  merit,  and  advancement  to  nobility,  to  augment  them,  to  confirm, 
to  change  and  adorn  them  in  the  shield ;  as  also  the  timbre  of  tlie  shield  with 
noble  helmets,  mantlings,  crowns,  crests,  and  other  exterior  ornaments,  and  even  to 
adorn  and  augment  both  shield  and  timbre  with  honourable  figures  at  one  time ; 
of  which  afterwards.  / 

The  above  mentioned  author  Hoppingius,  cap.  87.  memb.  5.  in  his  Treatise  de 
Jure  Insignium :  "  Non  solum  conferendi  nova  insignia  imperator,  papa,  regcs  su- 
"  periorem  non  recognoscentes,  potestate  uti  possunt ;  verum  etiam  certa  de 
"  causa  augendi,  mutandi,  diminuendi,  &-  confirmandi,  vetera  facultate  excellunt, 
"  non  quoad  clypeum  solum,  sive  scutum  solum,  sed  quoad  galeam,  sive  timbrum 
"  tantuai,  vel  denique  quoad  utrumque,  nunc  propter  bellicne  virtutis  gloriam, 
"  nunc  proper  dignitatem  &-  officium,  nunc  propter  successionem,  aliasve  infinitas 
"  causas,  fieri  solet."  Of  which  practice  our  author  gives  several  instances,  where- 
of I  shall  add  a  few. 

The  Eaiperor  Charles  V.  added  to  the  arms  of  the  Mennensi,  {^^ue  sunt  decent 
cuhi  sett  scaci,  which  I  take  to  be  cheque  of  ten  pieces,  argent  and  sable)  who  had 
fought  valiantly  for  the  House  of  Burgundy,  the  cross  of  Burgundy,  being  that  of 
St  Andrew,  trunked  vert,  to  be  placed  in  the  base  of  the  shield ;  as  the  words 
of  the  diploma,  "  Crucem  Burgundicam,  sive  S.  Andrea,  viridis  colorls,  trun- 
"  catis  seu  mutatis  utrinque  ramis,  deferendam,  &  posteris  transmittendam,  dedit;" 
as  also  the  shield  of  arms  was  to  be  adorned  with  a  helmet,  and,  for  crest,  a  dog's 
head. 

Alphonsus  King  of  Arragon,  in  the  year  151 1,  dignified  Wistan  Brown,  an 
Englishman,  with  the  Order  of  Knighthood,  and  added  to  his  shield  of  arms  a 
black  eagle. 

As  the  shield  of  arms  used  to  be  augmented  by  sovereigns  for  special  services, 
so  they  have  been  in  use  to  adorn  the  timbre,  helmet,  and  crest,  with  additaments 
of  honour,  of  which  I  shall  give  one  instance  from  our  author.  The  Emperor 
Maxi;nilian  I.  honoured  the  crest  of  Eric  Duke  of  Brunswick  (being  the  train  of 
a  peacock)  with  a  star,  for  his  eminent  valour  in  a  battle  against  the  Duke  of  Ba- 
varia: And  the  same  practice  is  with  us,  as  the  crest  of  the  Earl  of  Winton,  be- 
ing a  dragon  vert ,  charged  with  a  blazing  star  on  its  shoulder,  for  the  eminent 
valour  of  the  family;  and  the  Duke  of  Lauderdale  got  from  King  Charles  II.  for 
crest,  a  lion  sdnnt;  of  which  more  fully  in  the  Chapter  of  Crests. 

Since  I  am  here  speaking  of  Arms  of  Concessit,  I  must  distinguish  betwixt  ge- 
neral and  special  concessions.  By  the  first,  I  understand  those  which  the  principal 
herr.ld  is  empowered  to  grant,  by  virtue  of  a  general  clause  for  that  end,  in 
many  of  the  patents  of  our  nobility:  which  ordinarily  runs  thus,  or  in  such  like 
words,  "  Mandamus  Leoni  nostro  armorum,  ut  tale  additamentum  armorium  prae- 
"  sentibus  insigniis  prasfati  Domini,  &c.  ut  in  talibus  casibus  usitatis  det  &  prae- 
"  scribat." 

Arms,  again,  of  special  concession,  are  particularly  mentioned  and  blazoned  in 
the  diplomas,  letters  patent,  or  grants  of  the  sovereign,  and  are  ordinarily  of  some 
part  of  the  sovereign's  ensigns  or  regalia,  which  cannot  be  allowed  or  given  by  the 
principal  herald  without  a  special  warrant  from  the  sovereign. 

Both  these  arms  of  general  and  special  concessions  are  commonly  called  coats  of 
augmentation,  because  they  augment  the  bearing. 


64  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  i^c. 

The  practice  of  giving  coats  of  augmentation,  by  the  general  clause  in  the  patents 
of  nobility  above  mentioned,  is  no  older  than  the  reign  of  King  James  VI.  given 
to  those  who  were  advanced  to  degrees  of  dignity;  and  the  lands  from  which  they 
had  their  title  of  lord,  viscount,  earl,  &-c.  not  being  noble  feus  with  arms  annexed 
to  them,  desired  coats  of  augmentation  as  best  pleased  them,  to  supply  the  want  of 
feudal  ones ;  of  which  afterwards. 

The  first  that  I  have  met  with  is  that  used  by  the  Earls  of  Winton,  when, 
Robert  Lord  Seaton  was  created  Earl  of  Winton  with  all  solemnity  at  Holy- 
roodhouse,  the  loth  of  November  1601,  he  got  a  coat  of  augmentation  from  the 
herald  suitable  to  the  merit  of  the  family,  viz.  for  the  title  of  Winton,  azure,  a 
blazing  star  of  ten  points,  withm  a  doable  tressure,  flowered  and  counter-llowered 
or,  (having  right  before  to  the  tressure  by  special  concession);  with  the  motto. 
Lit amhiatis  fidget  bonoribiis;  to  show  the  constant  loyalty  and  heroic  virtue  of  the 
family. 

The  next  coat  of  this  kind  I  meet  with,  is  that  of  the  Lord  Livingston,  who, 
when  he  was  advanced  to  the  dignity  of  Earl  of  Linlithgow,  augmented  h^s  arms 
with  an  inescutcheon,  azure,  an  oak  tree  within  a  bordure  argtnt,  charged  with 
eight  cinquefoils  j^w/f  J-,  which  he  placed  over  his  quartered  arms  of  Livingston  and 
Callender,  by  way  of  surtout,  for  the  title  of  Linlithgow ;  of  which  families  in  the 
First  Part  of  this  System,  and  elsewhere,  in  an  Essay  of  the  Ancient  and  Modern 
Use  of  Armories,  I  have  given  the  several  arms  engraven  on  copperplate,  with  these 
following,  viz.  Seaton  Earl  of  Dunfermline,  Ker  Marquis  of  Lothian,  who, 
when  he  was  created  Earl  of  Lothian  in  the  year  1606,  took  for  a  coat  of  augmen- 
tation, azure,  the  sun  in  its  splendour,  proper,  which  is  quartered  with  the  paternal 
coat  of  the  family. 

As  also  Hamilton  Lord  Binning,  when  he  was  created  Earl  of  Melrose,  13th 
March  1619,  took  for  that  title  a  coat  of  augmentation,  viz.  argent,  a  fesse  waved 
between  three  roses  gules,  relative  to  his  title  of  Melrose,  which  he  quartered  in 
the  second  and  third  quarters,  with  his  paternal  in  the  first  and  fourth  quarters, 
and  which  are  so  earned  by  his  successors,  though  he  got  his  title  altered  to  that 
of  Earl  of  Haddington. 

Viscounts  and  lords  of  Parliament  have  also  been  in  use,  with  us,  to  add  coats  of 
augmentation  to  their  paternal  ones.  Sir  Alexander  Seaton,  second  son  of  George 
Lord  Seaton  Earl  of  Winton,  and  his  countess.  Lady  Anne  Hay,  daughter  to  Fran- 
cis Earl  of  Errol,  being  created  Viscount  of  Kingston,  he  quartered  in  the  second 
and  third  places,  with  the  paternal  arms  of  Seaton,  as  a  coat  of  augmentation, 
argent,  a  dragon  vert,  spouting  out  fire,  being  the  crest  of  the  family  of  Winton, 
which  with  others  may  be  seen  in  my  foresaid  Essay. 

I  have  observed,  that  all  coats  of  augmentation  of  this  kind,  through  Europe, 
give  place  to  the  paternal  arms;  which  order  has  been  observed  with  us,  except 
in  the  achievements  of  the  Earl  of  Lothian,  and  the  Lord  Cardross :  But  the  lieir 
of  the  last,  David  Erskine  Earl  of  Buchan,  has  placed  the  coat  of  augmentation 
since  more  rightly  in  surtout ;  which  may  be  seen  in  taille  douce  in  the  First  Part 
of  this  System.  I  can  find  no  reason  for  such  coats  of  general  concession  by  the 
herald,  to  precede  the  paternal  or  other  dignified  feudal  arms  in  one  shield. 

Many  of  our  nobility,  who  have  the  same  right  to  assume  coats  of  augmentation, 
liave  never  made  use  of  them. 

But  arms  of  special  concession,  being  composed  of  the  figures  of  the  royal  arms 
or  regalia,  have  precedency  in  composing  or  marshalling  to  all  other  sorts  of  arms. 
Of  which, 

Anns  of  special  concession  are  those  granted  by  princes  and  free  states,  not  only 
to  their  subjects,  but  also  to  strangers,  by  a  particular  grant  or  patent,  containing 
the  blazon  of  such  a  coat,  made  up  of  some  part  of  the  figures  of  the  sovereign's 
ensign,  or  regalia,  to  be  added  to  the  receiver's  own  proper  arms. 

1  am  not  here  treating  of  the  first  grants  of  arms,  as  marks  of  honour,  which  I 
have  said  before,  in  the  definition  of  arms,  to  have  been  granted  by  sovereigns,  for 
distinguishing  person  and  families,  as  their  proper  ones :  But  here  I  understand 
them  new  coats  or  additaments  of  honour,  by  special  concessions  of  sovereigns  to 
be  joined  with  their  proper  ones. 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ^c-.  65 

Such  have  been  very  frequently  granted  by  our  sovereigns,  and  those  of  other 
nations,  to  well-deserving  persons,  both  of  the  high  and  low  nobility;  as  also  upon 
communities  ecclesiastical  and  secular. 

Sir  Joim  Ferae  tells  us,  in  his  fore-cited  book,  that  when  Charlemagne  erected 
the  six  ecclesiastical  peers  of  France,  he  granted  to  them  arms  of  the  same  tinc- 
tures and  figures  with  the  royal  ensign  of  France ;  which,  though  they  have  been 
so  carried,  as  I  have  shown  before,  yet  I  doubt  very  much  of  the  antiquity  of  them. 
As  for  secular  communities,  there  are  several  instances  which  may  be  given  of  such 
grants  of  other  nations,  and  with  us  at  home,  which  have  been  honoured  with  the 
favour  of  such  royal  badges;  and  I  shall  here  but  give  one  instance:  The  Town  of 
Aberdeen  got- the  double  tressure,  a  part  of  the  royal  bearing,  added  to  their  arms, 
by  the  order  of  King  Robert  the  Bruce,  for  their  fidelity  and  loyalty  to  him,  being 
^ules,  three  towers  embattled  argent,  and  masoned  sable,  within  a  double  tressure, 
flowered  and  counter-floweied  of  the  second. 

In  this  manner,  sovereigns  and  free  states  have  honoured  and  rewarded  their  fa- 
vourites and  well-deserving  subjects  with  a  part  of  their  ai-ms,  as  additaments  of 
honour;  of  which  I  shall  give  some  instances. 

Charles  IV.  Emperor  of  Germany  and  King  of  Bohemia,  honoured  his  Chan- 
cellor Bartolus,  the  great  lawyer,  with  a  concession  to  him  and  his  issue,  for  to 
carry  the  royal  arms  of  Bohemia,  or,  a  lion  with  two  tails  gules,  as  Bartolus  tells 
himself^  in  his  Treatise  de  Insigniis,  thus,  "  A  Carolo  Quarto,  clarissimo  principe, 
"  Romanorum  imperatore,  nee  non  rege  Bohemia:,  mihi,  tunc  Cancellario  ejus, 
"  concessum  est,  inter  cstera,  ut  ego  &  omnes  de  agnatione  mea,  leonem  rubeum 
"  cum  caudis  duabus  in  campo  aureo  portare." 

There  are  many  ancient  families  in  Germany  who  marshal  with  their  own  bear- 
ings the  imperial  eagle,  by  special  concession  from  the  emperor :  But  it  is  to  be 
observed,  that  these  eagles  granted  by  the  emperor  have  but  one  head  ;  and  lawyers 
tell  us,  that  the  emperor,  and  other  sovereign  princes,  cannot  grant  their  entire 
imperial  ensigns  to  any  person;  as  John  Limneus,  "  Licet  ab  imperatore  sit  insig- 
"  nia  concedendi  potestas,  ilia  tamen  limitata,  ne  alicui  integram  aquilam,  maxime 
"  vero  imperialem,  concedant." 

The  Emperor  Charles  V.  King  of  Spain,  not  only  augmented  the  arms  of  Ro- 
bert DE  Clusis  within  the  shield,  but  also  adorned  the  shield  with  exterior  orna- 
ments, marks  of  a  true  nobility,  as  by  letters  patent  icth  of  October  1543,  with 
the  complete  achievement  illuminate  in  the  middle  of  the  patent,  which  I  thought 
fit  here  to  blazon  in  English,  and  after  give  it  in  Latin,  for  its  singularity,  as  in  the 
diploma. 

Quarterly,  first  and  fourth  sable,  three  oak  branches  leaved  and  acorned  or; 
1  and  I,  his  paternal  arms;  second  and  third  azure,  three  stars  of  six  points  or: 
1  and  I,  his  maternal  ones;  and,  on  a  chief  or,  an  eagle  displayed  with  one  head 
sable:  the  shield  is  timbred  with  an  open  helmet,  manihng  of  the  tinctures  of  the 
arms,  and  the  wreath  of  the  same  colours;  upon  which,  for  crest,  are  two  wings 
expanded  xflZ'/c',  and  betwixt  them  proceeds  the  Burgundian  cross  of  St  Andrew 
trunked  or.  Amongst  several  diplomas  of  nobility  and  arms  which  John  Baptista 
Christyn,  Chancellor  of  Brabant,  gives  in  his  excellent  book,  Jurisprudentia  Hc- 
rolca,  I  shall  add  a  part  of  the  above-mentioned  Robert's,  that  the  curious  may 
know  somewhat  of  the  form  of  blazon  by  concessions.  After  the  titles  of  the 
emperor,  and  introduction,  the  diploma  goes  on  thus,  "  Tibi  prasfato  Roberto  de 
"  Clusis  gentilitia  arma  &-  insignia  tua,  tarn  paterna  quam  materna,  non  modo  con- 
"  firmanda  8^  approbanda,  verum  etiam  augenda  &-  ornanda,  duximus,  ac  tenore 
"  prfesentium,  confirmamus,  approbamus,  &-  augemus,  &-  ornamus,  atque  ad  hunc 
"  modum  deferenda  &  gestenda  concedimus. 

■  "  Videlicet,  scutum  quadripartitum,  cujus  superior  dextra,  &  inferior  sinistra,  in 
"  campo  nigro,  tres  ramusculos  quemqs  transversos,  cum  binis  fohis,  &-  glande  in 
"  medio  florum  aurei  sivecrocei  coloris,  sursum  conversis,  triangulari  forma  positos, 
"  quae  arma  tua  posita  sunt;  inferior  vero  dextra,  &  superior  sinistra  partes,  in 
"  area  azurei  sen  coelesti  coloris,  materna  tua  armorum  insignia,  nimirum  tres 
"  Stellas  sex  radiis,  singulas  aurei  sive  crocei  coloris,  triangulari  simihter  forma 
"  collocatas  (/.  e.  1  and  i)  nempe  unam  in  basi,  reliquas  duas  in  superioribus  an- 
"  gulis,  singulse  complectuntur.     Et  in  vertice  scuti  aurei  seu  crocei  coloris,  aqui- 

VoL.  II.  R 


66  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  Uc. 

"  lam  nigram,  unius  capitis  dextrorsum  flexi  a  pectore  supra,  rostro  aperto,  lingua 
"  vibrantc,  &.  alis  extcnsis:  Porro  scuto  incumbit  galea  aperta,  nign  &.  aurei  seu 
"  crocci  colorum,  lacmiis  redimita,  in  cujus  cuno,  super  fascia  tortili,  eorundein 
"  colorum,  inter  gemiiias  alas  nigras  extensas,  crux  divi  Andrea,  sive  Burgundicac, 
"  truucata,  aurei  colons,  eminet.  Qiiemadmodum,  ha;c  omnia  in  medio  prtesen- 
"  tium  accuratius  depicta  sunt,  volentes  &-  hoc  nostro  CiEsario  statuentes  edicto, 
"  quod  posthac  tu  pra:tate  Roberte,  ac  liberi  &  hceredes  &-  descendentes  tui  ante- 
"  dicti,  hujusmodi  arma  &  insignia,  insignium  vera:  nobilitatis,  habeatis  &-  defera- 
"  tis  ubique  locorum  ac  terrarum,  in  omnibus  &•  singulis  honestis  decentibusque 
"  actibus  &-  expeditionibus,  nobilium  armigerorum  more,  tarn  joco  &  serio,  torna- 
"  mentis,  hastiludiis,  bellis,  duellis,"  &-c.  By  such  royal  concessions  the  receivers 
are  not  only  nobilitate,  but  qualified  to  be  admitted  into  military  exercises,  serious 
or  in  disport;  such  as  combats,  joustings  and  tournaments,  where  none  are  allowed 
but  those  that  are  truly  noble. 

In  France  there  are  a  considerable  number  of  old  families  which  enjoy  the  like 
favour,  in  carrying  flower-de-luces,  the  imperial  figures  of  France,  by  letters  patent; 
for  which  see  Menestrier  and  other  French  heralds. 

The  Dukes  of  Savoy  have  made  concessions  of  several  quarters  of  their  armorial 
ensigns  to  several  families;  as  to  the  House  of  Viles  of  Ferrara,  who  carry,  quar- 
terly, first  and  fourth  the  wild  horse  of  Saxe,  which  belongs  to  Savoy,  as  his  original 
arms;  second  and  third  the  proper  arms  of  the  House  of  Viles,  and  over  all,  by 
way  of  surtout,  the  cross  of  Savoy. 

The  Republic  of  Venice  has  made  several  concessions  to  their  own  subjects  of 
their  symbolical  figure,  the  winged  lion  of  St  Mark,  the  armorial  figure  of  that  re- 
public; as  also  to  strangers,  as  by  that  one  granted  by  the  senate  to  Rene  de 
VoYFR.  de  Pauliny,  Count  de  Argenson,  the  French  king's  ambassador  to  that  re- 
public, which  are  to  be  seen  on  the  monument  erected  for  him  there  at  St  Job's 
church;  as  Menestrier  gives  us;  quarterly,  first  and  hunh  (iziire,  two  leopards  or, 
for  Voyer  de  Pauliny;  second  and  third  ardent,  a  fesse  sable,  for  the  House  de  Ar- 
genson, and,  by  way  of  surtout,  the  arms  of  the  republic,  viz.  azure,  a  lion  seiant 
winged,  and  diademated  or,  holding  a  book  open,  with  these  words  upon  it.  Pax 
tibi.  Marce,  tu  evangelista  mens. 

Other  potentates  have  been  in  use  to  do  the  same  honour,  not  only  to  their 
subjects,  but  to  strangers.  The  Kings  of  France  have  honoured  several  Scots  fa- 
milies for  their  valour,  with  their  arms,  as  the  Stewarts  of  Lennox,  the  Douglasses, 
and  the  Kennedys. 

Sir  Hugh  Kennedy  of  Ardistanshire,  who,  for  h.is  valour  in  the  wars  of  France 
against  England,  being  under  the  command  of  John  Stewart  Eaii  of  Buchan,  was 
honoured  by  the  King  of  France  with  his  arms,  viz.  azure,  three  flower-de-luces 
or;  which  he  and  his  successors  marshalled  in  the  first  and  fourth  quarters  with 
those  of  Kennedy  in  the  second  and  third  quarters,  as  those  descended  of  him,  viz. 
the  Kennedys  of  Bargeny,  the  Kennedys  of  Kirkhill  and  Binning  in  the  shire  of 
Ayr  ;  of  which  more  particularly  in  the  First  Vohime. 

Selden  tells  us,  in  his  Titles  of  Honour,  "  That  when  Gustavus  Adolphus  King 
"  of  Sweden  received  the  investiture  of  the  Garter  from  Henry  St  George,  Rich- 
"  mond-Herald,  and  Peter  Young,  Gentleman  Usher,  at  Darsavv  in  Prussia,  the  27th 
"  of  September  1627,  he  conferred  the  honour  of  knighthood  upon  them;  and, 
"  by  a  particular  grant  in  their  patents  of  honour,  allowed  them  to  quarter  the 
"  arms  of  Sweden  with  their  proper  arms." 

King  James  I.  of  England,  and  VI.  of  Scotland,  was  graciously  pleased  to  confer 
solemnly  the  dignity  of  knighthood  upon  Nicolas  de  Moline,  a  noble  senator  of 
Venice,  sent  by  that  state  to  his  majesty ;  as  also,  for  a  further  honour,  to  ennoblish 
the  coat-armour  of  the  said  Nicolas  de  Moline,  being  azure,  the  wheel  of  a  water- 
mill  or,  (by  way  of  augmentation)  with  a  canton  argent,  charged  with  thebadges 
of  the  two  kingdoms,  viz.  of  the  red  rose  of  England,  and  thistle  of  Scotland,  con- 
joined pale-ways;  as  by  letters  patent  under  his  Majesty's  Great  Seal  of  England, 
appeareth  in  these  words,  "  Eundem  dominum  Nicoluum  de  Moline,  in  frequenti 
"  procerum  noitrornm  pra;sentia,  equitem  auratum  merito  creavimus,  &-  insuper 
"  equestri  huic  dignirati  in  honoris  accessionevn  aiijecinius,  ut  in  avito  clypeo  gen- 
"  tilitio  cantonem  gestet  argenteum,   cum  Anglue  rosa  rubente  partita,  &•  Scotiie 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  oV.  67 

"  carduo  virente  conjunctum  :  Qiur,  ex  insignibus  iiostris  regiis  special!  nostra 
"  gratia,  discerpsimus,  ut  viituti  bene  nierenti  suus  constaret  honor;  &  nostra  in 
"  tHutuin  benevolentia;  testimonium  in  perpetuum  extaret." 

As  1  hinted  before,  though  sovereigns  cannot  grant  their  entire  armorial  ensigns 
(bein,^-  marks  of  their  authority)  to  subjects  or  strangers,  which  cannot  but  be  in 
prc;i,idice  or  dishonour  of  their  throne  and  kingdom,  as  lawyers  tell  us;  yet  we  See 
th.y  have  granted  their  shields  of  arms  to  be  quartered  with  the  paternal  coats  of 
those  they  favoured  :  So  that,  in  that  case,  they  were  not  imperial  arms,  but  signs 
of  lionour  and  gratitude  to  the  receivers.  It  is  true  the  emperor  seldom  or  never 
granted  the  eagle  with  two  heads  to  any  prince,  but  with  one  head  only ;  neither 
properly  could  he  with  two,  because  they  are  the  proper  and  fLxed  figures  of  the 
empire,  and  not  these  of  his  paternal  family  out  of  which  he  is  elected:  But  other 
hereditary  prmces  seem  to  be  at  more  freedom  to  give  their  own  paternal  bearings, 
though  ensigns  of  their  sovereignty,  to  be  marshalled  with  others;  but  neither  the 
emperor  nor  other  princes  ever  did  adorn  the  shields  of  their^  favourites  with. their 
royal  timbre,  /.  e.  helmet,  crown,  crest,  &c.  Of  late  we  find  that  the  Emperor 
Leopold  n.  when  he  made;  John  Churchill  Duke  of  Maklborough  and  Marquis 
of  Blandford,  one  of  the  Princes  of  the  Empire,  by  the  title  of  Prince  of  Mix- 
DELHEiM  in  Swabia,  anno  1705,  he  allowed  to  him  and  his  heirs-male  to  carry 
the  emperor's  crest,  viz.  the  imperial  eagle  diplayed  with  two  head's  diaddmate  or, 
i.  e.  the  heads  encircled  with  rounds,  or  orbits  of  gold,  as  that  of  the  emperor's ; 
but  he  placed  his  arms  on  the  breast  of  the  eagle  as  a  supporter,  being,  as  said  is, 
a  prince  of  the  empire:  But  in  Britain,  as  a  peer  thereof,  he  had  his  achievement 
otherwise ;  as  in  the  sixth  edition  of  Guillim's  Display,  at  the  title  of  Dukes,  page 
99.  thus  given  us,  sahle,  a  lion  rampant  argent,  a  canton  of  St  George,  viz.  argent, 
a  cross  gules,  surrounded  with  the  Order  of  the  Garter;  crest,  on  a  wreath,  a  lion 
gardant  couchant  gules,  sustaining  a  banner  argent,  charged  with  a  hand  of  Ulster, 
viz.  an  hand  sinister  erect,  and  conped  at  the  \^n%X. gules;  supporters,  two  wiverns 
gules,  that  on  the  right  having  St  George,  or  the  English  ensign,  viz.  argent,  a  cross 
gules,  that  on  the  left,  St  Andrew,  or  thj  Scot's  ensign,  viz.  azure,  a  saltier  argent 
depicted  on  targets,  or  oval  shields,  upon  each  of  their  respective  breasts,  and  sus- 
pended on  their  necks  by  collars  of  gold.  He  was  first  dignified  with  the  title  of 
Baron  of  Churchill  of  Eyemouth  in  Scotland,  16S2,  and  after.  Baron  Churchill  of 
Sandridge  in  England,  1685,  ^'^"^^  of  Marlborough  1689,  and  Marquis  and  Duke 
1702. 

Menestrier,  in  his  Treatise  of  Arms,  in  the  chapter  of  Grants  and  Concessions, 
gives  an  instance  of  a  woman  receiving  a  coat  of  augmentation,  which  was  when 
the  Emperor  Charles  IV.  passing  from  Padua  to  get  himself  crowned  at  Rome, 
with  his  empress,  who  took  in  her  train  Jean  Beanchittie,  the  widow  of  a  famous 
lawyer:  Amongst  other  favours,  the  empress  gave  her  a  grant  to  carry  in  the 
middle  of  her  arms,  in  a  lozenge  shield,  those  of  Lithuania,  viz.  gules,  a  chevalier 
armed  in  all  points,  on  horseback  argent,  brandishing  a  sword ;  and  on  his  left  arm 
a  shield /2z«/r,  charged  with  a  cross,  with  double  travesses  of  the  second,  being  a 
part  of  the  empress's  bearing,  a  daughter  of  the  King  of  Poland,  and  Duke  of  Li- 
thuania: which  grant  was  confirmed  by  the  emperor. 

Henry  VIII.  of  England  honoured  his  wives  with  additional  arms;  of  which 
afterwards:  and  of  late  Charles  II.  of  Great  Britain  gianted  a  coat  of  augmenta- 
tion to  Anne  Clarges,  wife  to  George  Monk  Duke  of  Albemarle,  viz.  azure,  a 
flower-de-luce  or,  within  a  bordure  of  the  last,  charged  with  eight  roses  gules, 
quartered  in  the  first  place,  with  her  paternal  coat  in  tire  second,  being  barry  of 
twelve  pieces,  argent  and  azure;  and,  on  a  canton  sahle,  a  ram's  head  couped  ar- 
gent, v.ith  four  horns  or,  as  being  descended  of  the  family  of  Clarges  in  Hainault  in 
Flanders. 

It  is  only  sovereign  princes  and  republics  that  can  make  such  concessions  of 
their  pubhc  ensigns,  being  more  sacred  than  tliose  of  subjects,  which  may  be  more 
freely  assumed,  with  less  authority,  upon  the  accounts  before  mentioned,  by  mar- 
riage,  alliance,  adoption,  &.c. 

Which  additaments  of  honour  are  either  placed  in  one  quarter,  with  the  proper 
arms  of  families,  or  marshalled  with  them  in  distinct  quarters :  Which  last  way  is 
the  proper  subject  now  in  hand. 


68  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  b'r. 

But  since  anciently  there  has  been,  and  still  continues  a  frequent  practice  of 
composing  some  one  part  or  other  of  the  royal  ensigns  or  regalia  with  paternal 
arms,  I  shall  here  insist  a  little  on  them  with  their  proper  situation,  with  paternal 
figures  in  one  shield  or  quarter,  before  I  proceed  to  give  further  instances  of  mar- 
shalling arms  of  special  concession  with  paternal  ones  in  distinct  quarters. 

The  pieces  or  figures  of  sovereign  ensigns  or  regalia  claim  a  precedency  in  the 
most  honourable  place  of  the  shield  or  quarter  before  the  paternal  figures,  and  are 
to  be  placed  in  chief  in  a  dexter  canton;  and  sometimes  sovereigns  ordain  their 
achievement  as  a  crest  or  supporters,  if  they  be  convenient  for  that  end :  Of  which 
afterwards  when  1  speak  to  exterior  ornaments. 

Menestrier  tells  us,  "  That  it  is  the  general  practice  of  Europe  to  give  the  most 
"  honourable  place  of  the  shield  to  those  royal  figures;  and  that  some  princes,  in 
"  their  concessions  of  them,  expressly  ordain  them  to  be  so  placed;  as  John  King 
"  of  Arragon  and  Sicily,  rewarding  two  knights  for  there  good  services,  and  to 
"  put  a  particular  mark  of  respect  upon  them,  allowed  them  to  carry  the  armorial 
"  figures  of  Arragon,  Navarre,  and  Sicily,  on  condition  they  should  place  them  on 
"  a  chief  above  the  arms  of  their  families ;  and  though  they  had  a  chief  before, 
"  they  behoved  to  add  another."  And  this  is  the  reason  we  see  foreign  arms  oft- 
times  have  two  chiefs ;  of  which  I  have  given  instances  in  the  First  Volume  of  this 
System,  and  shall  here  add  another. 

The  Princes  of  Mass  a  in  Italy,  of  the  name  of  Cibo,  have  their  paternal  arms 
honoured  with  two  concessions,  placed  upon  two  chiefs,  the  one  soutenu  of  the 
other;  that  below  contains  the  arms  of  Genoa,  granted  for  the  successful  negotia- 
tion of  William  Cibo  for  that  repubhc  with  Pope  Clement  VII.  1532;  and  above, 
another  chief,  with  the  arms  of  the  empire,  viz.  the  eagle  with  one  head,  granted 
by  Maximilian  the  emperor  when  he  made  Alberick  Cibo  a  prince  of  the  empire, 
whose  blazon  is  thus,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  or,  a  bend  cJieque,  argent  and 
azure,  (the  paternal  coat  of  Cibo)  a  chief  argent,  charged  with  a  plain  cross  gules, 
(the  arms  of  Genoa)  surmounted  of  a  chief  of  the  empire  or,  a  double  eagle  display- 
ed sable,  and,  (for  diminution,  and  to  difference  it  from  that  of  the  empire)  on  its 
breast,  a  scroll  fesse-ways;  on  it  the  word  Libert  as;  second  quarter  azure,  an 
eagle  displayed  argent,  crowned  or,  for  Este,  quartered  with  Ferrara,  azure,  three 
flower-de-luces  or,  within  a  bordure  indented  of  the  same,  gules;  third  quarter, 
coupe,  or  and  gules,  the  branch  of  a  thorn  tree  sable,  flowered  argent  in  pale,  for 
the  family  of  Malespine;  and  over  all,  by  way  of  surtout,  on  a  lozenge  escutcheon 
or,  five  torteauxes  gules  in  orle,  surmounted  of  the  sixth  azure,  charged  with  three 
tlower-de-luces  (??•,  as  a  coat  of  alliance  with  the  Medicis  Dukes  of  Tuscany: 
Which  arms  are  to  be  seen  engraven  in  yeu  d' Armories,  and  in  my  Essay  of  the 
Ancient  and  Modern  Use  of  Armories,  with  several  others,  which  I  may  have  oc- 
casion here  to  mention. 

The  Dukes  of  Tuscany  and  the  Medici  placed  the  arms  of  France  upon  one  of 
their  torteauxes  above  the  rest,  as  all  the  families  and  cities  in  France,  who  carry 
flower-de-luces  as  additaments  of  honour,  by  concessions  of  the  sovereign,  place 
them  in  chief,  or  on  a  chief;  and  the  same  practice  is  used  in  Britain,  by  the  fol- 
lowing examples. 

Sandford,  in  his  before-mentioned  History,  tells  us,  "  That  Henry  VIII.  of 
"  England  honoured  the  arms  of  Thomas  Manners,  whom  he  created, Earl  of  Rut- 
"  LAND,  upon  the  account  he  was  descended  from  a  sister  of  King  Edward  IV." 
his  paternal  bearing  being,  or,  two  bars  azure,  and  a  c\i\ei gules;  the  chief  was  then 
formed,  quarterly,  azure  and  gules,  on  the  first  two  flower-de-luces  or;  on  the  se- 
cond a  lion  passant  gardant  or;  the  third  as  second,  and  the  fourth  as  first,  which 
were  parts  of  the  armorial  figures  of  England. 

Guillim  says,  "  Sometimes  these  augmentations  are  found  to  be  borne  upon 
"  a  chief  of  the  escutcheon  above  the  paternal  coat;"  for  which  he  gives  the 
above  example  of  the  Earl  of  Rutland  ;  and  then  adds,  "  It  is  a  form  of  bearing  of 
"  a  part  in  part;  for  here  is,  says  he,  abated  one  flower-de-luce  of  the  arms  of 
'•  France,  and  two  lions  of  the  arms  of  England,  and  both  on  the  chief  part  of  the 
"  escutcheon:"  Yet  v^^e  meet  with  sometimes  the  augmentation  in  the  centre  of 
the  shield,  as  in  the  arms  of  Compton  Earl  of  Northampton,  viz.  sable,  a  lion  passant 
gardant  or,  between  three  helmets  argent,  garnished  gold :  which  lion,  being  one 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  Isc.  63 

ijf  those  of  England,  is  an  augmentation.  And  he  who  adds  the  Blazons  of  the 
Nobility  to  Guillr.n's  Display,  gives  us,  page  314.  an  example  of  a  coat  of  arms 
worthy  to  be  mentioned,  whoae  words  1  shall  here  add,  "  viz.  azure,  a  naval 
"  croivn,  within  an  orle  of  twelve  anchors  or,  borne  by  the  name  of  Lendon,  and  was 
"  granted  by  Sir  Edward  Walker,  Garter  K.ing  at  Arms,  by  patent,  dated  at 
"  Brussels  the  loth  of  May  1658,  in  the  loth  year  of  the  reign  of  King  Charles  H. 
"  to  Captain  Robert  Lendon,  born  of  honest  parents  at  Allington,  in  the  county  of 
"  Devon,  who,  m  his  youth,  actively  appUed  himself  to  navigation;  and  being  an 
"  oilicer  in  the  royal  navy,  anno  1648,  (which,  for  some  years  before,  had  been, 
"  and  then  was,  possessed  and  employed  by  the  usurped  power  of  a  rebellious  par- 
"  liament)  had  thereby  the  happy  opportunity,  out  of  a  due  and  loyal  sense  of  his 
"  duty  to  his  lawful  sovereign  Iving  Charles  II.  to  be  tlie  prime  and  active  instru- 
"  ment  to  induce  twelve  ships  (which  his  anchors  resemble)  of  the  said  navy,  to 
"  their  duty  and  obedience,  and  to  embrace  his  majesty's  service  against  his  re- 
"  bellious  subjects." 

There  is  no  part  of  the  imperial  ensigns  of  sovereign  princes,  and  even  their  re- 
galia, but  have  been  granted  by  special  concessions,  as  by  our  kings,  to  honour  the 
arms  of  some  of  the  best  families  of  the  kingdom,  which  have  also  been  granted  to 
strangers,  as  a  testimony  of  our  king's  favour:  Of  all  the  pieces  of  honour  in  the 
arms  of  Scotland,  the  double  tressure  most  frequently  has  been  allowed  to  be  car- 
ried, as  a  badge  of  a  royal  maternal  descent,  loyalty,  and  virtue;  of  which  I  shall 
give  in  short  a  few  instances. 

Thomas  Randolph  Earl  of  Murray,  Lord  Annandale  and  Man,  as  a  nephew  to 
King  Robert  Bruce  by  his  sister,  was  the  first  of  his  family  who  was  allowed  to 
place  the  double  tressure  round  his  paternal  figures,  the  three  cushions  ^ti/es  in  a 
field  or;  as  is  evident  by  his  seals  of  arms  appended  to  charters.  And  Sir  Alex- 
ander Seaton  of  that  Ilk,  being  son  of  Sir  Christopher  Seaton,  and  Christian,  sister 
to  K.ing  Robert  Bruce,  was  the  first  of  the  progenitors  of  the  noble  family  of  the 
Earls  of  Winton  and  Lord  Seaton,  who  encompassed  the  thj-ee  crescents,  the  pater- 
nal figures  of  Seaton,  with  the  double  tressure  counter-flowered  ^u/es,  in  a  field  or, 
upon  account  of  his  royal  maternal  descent.  There  are  many  other  noble  fa- 
milies, upon  the  same  account,  on  whom  I  cannot  insist  here,  as  Lyon  Earl  of 
Stvathmore:  Nor  of  those  who  carry  it  upon  account  of  merit  and  favour  of  our 
kinjs,  as  Douglas  Duke  of  Queensberry,  Erskine  Earl  of  Kelly,  Gordon  Earl  of 
Aberdeen,  Gordon  Earl  of  Aboyne,  Scott  of  Thirlestane,  &-c.  of  vs'hom  before  in 
tht.  First  Part  of  this  System. 

The  arms  of  several  strangers  have  been  honoured  by  our  kings  with  the  double 
tressuie:  King  James  V.  knighted  and  honoured  one  Nicol  Combet,  a  Frenchman, 
with  It,  asd;d  King  James  VI.  Jacob  Van  Eiden,  a  Dutchman,  and  several  others; 
as  then-  patents  bear  in  the  Chapel  Rolls  in  England,  titled,  Diversi  tractutus  ainici- 
tianirn  tempore  Jacobi  regis. 

Sylvester  Petra  Sancta,  an  Italian,  in  his  Treatise  of  Arms,  speaking  of  the  double 
tres^ure,  says,  "  Celebris  est  duplaris  limbus,  quern  paralelte  lines  duae,  ac  simul 
"  florentes,  describunt  in  tessera  regis  Scotorum;"  and  gives  us  the  arms  of  a 
Dutch  and  French  family  with  the  tressure. 

Another  piece  of  our  sovereign  arms,  I  mean  the  lion,  the  figure  of  tlie  ancient 
ensign  of  Scotland,  has  been  allowed  to  be  carried  by  several  families  of  this  king- 
dom, as  a  sign  of  their  royal  favour,  within  three  shields;  as  that  granted  to  Sir 
Alexander  Carron,  who  carried  the  banner  of  Scotland  before  King  Alexander  I. 
in  his  expedition  against  the  rebels  in  Mearns  and  Murray:  Where,  by  Sir  Alex- 
ander's conduct  and  eminent  valour,  the  king  obtained  a  notable  victory  over  the 
rebels;  for  which  his  name  was  changed  from  Carron  to  Scrymgeour,  which  sig- 
nifies a  hard  fighter,  (as  our  historians)  and  got  a  coat  of  arms  suitable  thereto, 
viz.  gules,  a  lion  rampant  or,  armed  and  langued  azure,  holding  in  his  dexter  paw 
a  crooked  sword,  or  scimitar,  argent.  (See  Plate  of  Achievements,  and  more  of 
this  family  in  the  Appendix.)  And,  in  later  times,  favourites  have  been  allowed 
to  embellish  the  shield  of  arms  with  a  lion,  as  a  crest  or  supporter;  as  that  allowed 
to  the  Duke  of  Lauderdale.  And  the  same  may  be  said  of  the  unicorn,  the  sup- 
porter of  the  achievement  of  Scotland,  the  St  Andrew's  cross,  the  thistle,  crown, 
sword  and  sceptre,  the  ensigns  and  regalia  of  the  kingdom,  have  been  granted  by 

Vol.  U.  S 


^  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  y<r. 

our  sovereigns  to  their  well-deserving  subjects ;  of  which  in  the  First  Part  of  this 
System ;  as  also  to  strangers  as  additaments  of  honour,  not  only  by  way  of  com- 
posing with  their  paternal  figures  in  one  area,  but  also  by  distinct  areas  or  quarters 
marshalled  with  their  own;  of  which  by  and  by. 

As  to  the  first  way,  by  composing  them  in  one  quarter  with  the  paternal  arms,  I 
shall  give  for  instance  the  arms  of  Murray  the  Earl  of  Annandale,  bemg  azure, 
three  stars  argent,  with  a  crescent  in  the  centre,  all  within  a  double  tressure  flovver- 
ed  and  cQunter-flowered  or;  and,  for  an  additament  of  honour,  a  canton  of  the 
second,  charged  with  a  thistle  vert,  ensigned  with  an  imperial  crown.  And  the 
same  thistle,  with  the  crown,  was  granted  by  King  Charles  II.  to  Sir  George  Ooil- 
viE  of  Barras,  for  his  fidelity  and  real  preservation  of  the  regalia  of  Scotland,  to  the 
loss  of  his  lady,  and  his  long  imprisonment  in  the  usurpation  of  Oliver  Cromwell. 
King  Charles  I.  was  pleased  to  raise  and  advance  Dame  Elizabeth  Beaumont,  then 
the  wife  of  Sir  Thomas  Richardson,  Lord  Chief  Justice  of  the  Common  Pleas  in 
England,  to  the  honour  of  Baroness  of  Cramond  in  Scotland,  and  continued  the 
same  honours  to  her  and  Sir  Thomas's  heirs-male,  by  letters  patent  the  28th  Fe- 
bruary 1628;  which  was  the  only  female  creation  to  be  met  with  in  this  realm. 
He  honoured  the  arms  of  Sir  Thomas  with  the  additament  of  a  canton  azure, 
charged  with  a  St  Andrew's  cross  argent,  the  ensign  of  Scotland. 

But,  to  leave  such  pieces  joined  in  one  field  with  the  paternal  ones,  I  shall  pro- 
ceed to  give  a  few  examples  of  those  who  carry  some  of  the  royal  figures,  which 
make  up  entire  quarters  by  themselves. 

The  ancientest  coat  of  special  concession  which  I  meet  with  in  books  of  heraldry, 
is  that  memorable  one,  viz.  a  sword  supporting  an  imperial  crown,  by  King  Ro- 
bert I.  with  the  barony  of  Barns,  to  his  nephew  Sir  Alexander  Seaton,  for  his 
own  singular  service  in  Scotland  and  Ireland,  in  the  service  of  Edward  Bruce,  the 
king's  brother,  and  in  consideration  of  his  father's  loyalty  and  near  alhance  to  the 
royal  family;  of  which  before. 

In  latter  times  our  kings  have  been  in  use  to  honour  their  well-deserving  sub- 
jects with  such  pieces  of  their  imperial  ensigns  as  King  James  VI.  did  to  the 
deliverers  of  his  person  from  the  pernicious  attempts  of  John  Ruthven  Earl  of 
Gowrie,  his  brother  Alexander  Ruthven,  and  their  accomphces,  on  the  5th  of  Au- 
gust 1600.  viz.  to  Sir  John  Ramsay,  Sir  Thomas  Erskine,  and  Sir  Hugh  Herries, 
who  killed  the  chief  assassins,  and  deHvered  the  king,  who  gave  them  special  con- 
cessions, as  follows. 

Sir  John  Ramsay  of  Wyliecleugh,  a  cadet  of  the  family  of  Dalhousie,  who  car- 
ried for  his  paternal  arms  argent,  an  eagle  displayed  sable,  beaked  and  niembred 
gules,  and,  on  his  breast,  a  crescent  of  the  last,  for  his  brotherly  difterence,  was  no- 
bilitate  by  the  said  king,  with  the  title  of  Viscount  of  Haddington,  and  with  an 
additament  to  his  arms,  viz.  azure,  a  dexter  hand  holding  a  sword  in  pale  argent, 
hiked  and  pommelled  or,  piercing  a  man's  heart  gules,  the  point  supporting  an  im- 
perial crown,  proper  ;  which  he  impaled  on  the  right,  with  his  paternal  on  the  left, 
side  of  the  shield.  And  when  King  James  VI.  was  advanced  to  the  crown  of 
England,  he  created  him  Lord  Baron  of  Kingston  upon  Thames,  and  Earl  ot  Hol- 
derness,  with  this  special  post  of  honour  relative  to  his  coat  of  augmentation,  that 
upon  the  5th  of  August  annually,  (which  was  a  day  appointed  to  be  kept  holy  for 
that  king's  happy  delivery  from  the  hands  of  his  enemies)  he  and  his  heirs-male 
for  ever  should  bear  the  sword  of  state  before  the  king  and  his  successors.  This 
Earl  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  to  Robert  Earl  of  Sussex,  and  with  her  had  two 
sons  and  a  daughter. 

Sir  Thomas  Erskine,  eldest  son  of  Sir  John  Erskine  of  Gogar,  immediate 
younger  brother  to  John.  Lord  Erskine,  first  Earl  of  Marr,  and  regent  of  Scotland 
in  the  minority  of  King  James  VI.  being  one  of  the  dehverers  of  that  King,  was  al- 
so honoured  with  a  coat  of  special  concession,  viz.  gules,  an  imperial  crown  within 
a  double  tressure,  counter-flowered  with  flower-de-luces  or,  which  he  quartered  in 
the  first  and  fourth  places  with  the  paternal  coat  of  Erskine,  and  was  by  the  King 
created  Lord  Dirleton,  and  after  Viscount  of  Fenton,  the  i8th  March  1606,  and 
then  Earl  of  Kelly  1619  :  and,  upon  that  King's  accession  to  the  crown  of  Eng- 
land, he  was  made  Captain  of  the  English  Guards,  Groom  of  the  Stole,  and  Knight 
of  the  Garter.     From  him  is  lineajly  descended  the  present  Earl  of  Kelly,  who 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ^6 .  ji 

carries  the  above  arms,  as  do  the  descendants  of  his  family  ;  as  Sir  Alux.vsdhk.  Ek.- 
SK.1NE  of  Gumbo,  Lyon  King  of  arms,  with  a  crescent  for  his  difference,  whose 
father  was  the  second  son  of  the  f;miily  of  Kelly. 

The  other  deliverer,  Sn-  Hugh  Herkies  of  Cowsland,  a  cadet  of  tlieLord  Herries, 
was  also  honoured  with  another  coat  of  augmentation  by  King  James  VL  which 
he  quartered  in  the  first  and  fourth  quarters  with  his  paternal  arms,  thus,  azure,  a 
hand  in  armour  issuing  from  the  right  side  of  the  shield,  holding  a  sword  support- 
ing an  imperial  crown,  proper  ;  second  and  third  arjc'iit,  three  urcheons  sable. 

Sandilands  Lord  Torphichem  carries  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  parted  per  fesse, 
azure  and  ur;  on  the  first  an  imperial  crown,  proper  ;  and,  on  the  second,  a  thistle 
vert,  as  a  coat  of  augmentation  ;  second  and  third. grand  quarter,  quarterly,  first  and 
fourth  urgent,  a  bend  azure,  the  paternal  bearing  of  die  name  of  Sandilands  ;  se- 
cond and  third,  the  arms  of  Douglas,  bemg  arms  of  patronage  as  some  will. 

Sir  James  S.vndilands  Baron  of  Sandilands  and  Wiston,  in  the  upper  ward  of 
Clydesdale,  descended  of  Sandilands  of  that  Ilk,  in  the  reign  of  King  David  Bruce; 
married  Eleanor  Bruce,  uterine  sister  to  William  Earl  of  Douglas,  v.'lio,  upon  the 
account  of  the  said  marriage,  gave  to  the  said  Sir  David  the  barony  of  VVest-Calder, 
called  Calder-Comitis  ;  upon  which  that  family  ever  since  have  quartered  the  arms 
of  Douglas  with  their  own,  as  arms  of  patronage  :  Of  which  family  was  Sir  James 
Sandilands,  Lord  of  Sr  John,  Great  Prior  of  the  Knights  of  Rhodes,  in  the  king- 
dom of  Scotland  ;  and  as  such  he  carried  the  thistle  and  crown,,  as  the  badge  of 
that  high  office.  He  was  sent  by  the  Parliament  of  Scotland  ambassador  to  Fran- 
cis and  Mary,  King  and  Qiieen  of  France  and  Scotland.  This  Sir  James  became 
protestant,  and  was  created  Lord  Torphichen  :  which  honour,  for  want  of  heir-male 
of  his  body,  fell  by  inheritance  to  the  Baron  of  Calder  his  cousin,  whose  successors 
enjoy  the  same  with  the  coat  of  augmentation. 

King  Charles  L  when  he  advanced  Sir  John  Hay  of  Netherleif,  descended  of  the 
family  of  Errol,  into  high  places  and  dignities,  as  Clerk-Register,  High-Chancellor 
of  Scotland,  Lord  Hay  of  Kinfauns,  Viscount  of  Duplin,  and  lastly  Earl  of  Kin- 
NOUL,  25th  March  1(133,  honoured  him  with  a  coat  of  auginentation,  viz.  azure,  an- 
umco'm  salient  argent,  h.ovne.A,  maned,  and  unguled  or,  (the  supporter  of  the  royal 
achievement)  within  a  bordure  of  the  last,  charged  with  half  thistles  vert,  and  hal£ 
Tosfi  fules,  joined  together  by  way  of  parti  per  pak,  being  the  badges  of  Scotland 
and  England,  to  represent  the  union  of  these  kingdoms  in  the  personof  King  James 
VL;  which  coat  of  augmentation  was  quartered  in  the  first  and  fourth  quarters  with 
these  of  the  paternal  coat  of  Hay,  argent,  three  escutcheons  gules  :  Unto  which 
honour  and  arms.  Hay  Viscount  of  DupUn,  by  descent  and  tailzie,  has  of  late  suc- 
ceeded, and  carries  the  same  arms ;  of  which,  with  others  above  mentioned;  see  in 
the  plates  of  the  Essay  of  Ancient  and  Modern  Use  of  Arms. 

It  is  to  be  observed,  then,  that  Arms  of  Special  Concession  have  precedency  of 
Paternal  Arms,  when  marshalled  with  them,  as  well  as  the  pieces  of  the  royal 
ensign,  when  composed  with  others  in  one  area,  possesses  the  honourable  and  chief 
places ;  which  is  clear  by  the  above  practice,  and  by  that  of  England  in  the  fol- 
lowing examples. 

Richard  II.  of  England  is  the  first  King  that  I  have  observed  to  have  granted 
such  arms  of  augmentation  to  his  subjects  ;  and,  as  I  observed  before,  added  to  his 
imperial  ensign  the  arms  of  Edward  the  Confessor,  upon  the  account  of  religion, 
being  azure,  a  cross  fleury  between  five  martlets  or;  which  bearing  also  he  granted, 
out  of  his  mere  grace,  (as  Camden  in  his  Remains  tells  us)  to  Thomas  Duke  ot 
Surrey,  with  the  addition  of  a  bordure  ermine,  to  impale  with  his  proper  arms ;  and 
the  same  again  without  the  bordure  to  Thomas  Mowbray  Duke  of  Norfolk,  to  be 
impaled  on  the  right  side,  with  his  own  on  the  left. 

The  same  King,  the  ninth  year  of  his  reign,  granted  a  coat  of  special  concession 
to  his  favourite  Robert  Vere,  Earl  of  Oxford,  Marquis  of  Dublin,  and  Duke  of 
Ireland,  that  he  should  bear  with  his  own  arms,  during  life,  azure,  three  imperial 
crowns  or,  within  a  bordure  argent,  as  the  words  of  that  concession  bears,  given  us 
by  Sandford  in  his  Genealogical  History  ;  "  ReK  concessit  Roberto  de  Vere  facto 
"  Marchione  de  Dublin,  quod  ipse,  quamdiu  viveret  &-  terram  &•  dominium  Hiber- 
"  nice  habuerit,  gerat  arma  de  azuro,  cum  tribus  coronis  de  aureo,  &•  una  circum- 
"  ferentia  vel  bordura  de  argento : "  These  he  quartered  in  the  first  place  with  his 


72  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ^c. 

paternal,  being,  quarterly,  gules  and  or,  on  the  first  a  mullet  argent.  He  was  the 
first  that  bare  the  title  of  Marquis  in  England.  He  died  without  issue,  and  was 
succeeded  into  the  fortune  and  honours  of  the  earldom  of  Oxford  by  his  uncle 
Aubrey  de  Vere,  who  carried  the  paternal  arms  of  the  family,  and  transmitted 
them  to  his  successors.  The  mullet  or  star  on  the  first  quarter,  some  English  he- 
ralds, such  as  Leigh,  GuiUim,  and  Morgan,  say,  represents  a  fallen  star,  or  meteor, 
which  fell  down  from  heaven  upon  the  shield  of  one  of  the  progenitors  of  Vere 
Earl  of  Oxford  when  he  was  at  the  siege  of  Jerusalem,  and  has  been  so  carried  by 
the  family  since  :  Bjt  that  ingenious  gentleman  who  wrote  the  Introduction 
to  the  sixth  edition  of  Guillim's  Display,  looks  upon  it  as  a  fable  about  the  star; 
and  tells  us,  '•  That  it  was  only  a  distinction  in  the  arms  of  that  family,  from  the 
"  arms  of  the  Lord  Say's  family,  (a  flourishing  house  at  that  time  in  the  same  ser- 
"  vice)  which,  excepting  the  star,  did  bear  quarterly  gules  and  or,  the  same  with 
"  Vere,  who  was  obliged  to  difference  from  the  Lord  Say  ;  for  two  different  fami- 
"  lies  in  one  nation  could  not  bear  one  coat  without  some  addition. 

He  gives  us  a  late  concession  of  arms  to  Sir  Cloudsly  Shovel,  one  of  the  Admi- 
rals of  England,  viz.  a  cheveron  betwixt  two  flower-de-luces  in  chief  nd  a  cres- 
cent in  base,  indicating  two  victories  by  the  flower-de  luces  over  the  French,  and- 
by  the  crescent  another  over  the  Turks. 

And,  in  the  fore-mentioned  6th  edition  of  Guillim,  at  the  title  of  Civil  Honours, 
page  66.  there  is  another  occasion  than  those  mentioned  of  quartering  other  coats 
of  arms :  "  Thus,  ,  if  an  Englishman  in  the  field,  when  the  banner  royal  is  dis- 
•'  played,  do  put  to  flight  any  gentleman  which  is  an  enemy  to  his  prince,  from  his 
"  banner  of  arms,  the  English  soldier  may  honour  his  own  coat  in  the  sinister 
"  quarter  with  the  proper  coat  of  the  gentleman  he  has  so  put  to  flight.  An  in- 
"  stance  of  this  kind  (says  our  author)  is  the  coat  of  Sir  John  Clark,  who  to^k 
"  prisoner  Lewis  de  Orleans,  Duke  of  Longueville,  at  the  Journey  of  Bomy  by 
"  Cerovenes,  Henry  VIII." 

Some  carry  their  prisoner's  coat  as  a  part  of  their  crest  ;  thus  did  Richard  Wal- 
ler of  Gromebridge  in  Kent,  who  took  prisoner  John  Duke  of  Orleans,  at  the  battle 
of  Agincourt,  and  hung  the  entire  coat  of  the  said  Duke  by  a  string,  upon  a  branch 
of  a  walnut  tree,  his  own  proper  crest. 

In  the  blazon  of  the  arms  of  William  Ferdinand  Cary,  Baron  of  Hunsdon, 
by  patent  first  Ehz.  1558,  argent  on  a  bei^d  sable,  three  roses  of  the  first,  the  arms 
of  a  vanquished  Arragonian  knight ;  the  proper  arms  of  Cary  being  gules,  a  che- 
veron between  three  swans  argent. 

Women  are  also  honoured  by  titles  of  honour  and  concessions  of  arms,  as  addi- 
taments  to  their  paternal  ones  ;  of  which  last  I  have  spoke  before,  page  34.  As 
for  their  additaments  of  honour,  I  shall  here  add  some  few  examples  with  the 
English,  who  say,  as  in  Guillim,  "  Women  in  England  are  noble  according  to  their 
"  husband's  quahty  (as  also  in  Scotland)  and  so  are  either  honourable  and  noble, 
"  or  ignoble ;  their  honourable  dignities  are  princesses,  duchesses,  marchionesses, 
"  countesses,  viscountesses,  and  baronesses." 

The  noblesse  are  all  knights'  ladies,  who,  in  all  writings,  are  stiled  dames ;  all  es-- 
quires'  and  gentlemens'  wives,  on]y  gentlewomen. 

The  third  sort  comprehends  the  plebeians,  and  are  commonly  called  good- 
wives. 

NoblewoTnen  are  so  by  creation,  descent,  or  marriage. 

Of  women  honourable  by  creation  are  divers  examples  ;  of  wliich  the  first  (as 
our  author  remembers)  was  Margaret  Countess  of  Norfolk,  created  by  Richard  II. 
Duchess  of  Norfolk  ;  and  many  of  them  had  their  honours  granted  by  patents  to 
themselves,  and  the  heirs-male  of  their  bodies  to  be  begotten  ;  with  special  clauses, 
"  That  their  heirs-male  shall  have  voices  in  parliament,  creation-money,  their  mo- 
•'  ther's  titles,  as  if  she  a  dutchess,  he  a  duke  ;  and  if  a  countess,  he  an  earl ;  with 
"  the  ceremony  of  mantle,  surcoat,  arms,  and  coronet,  &c."  The  like  grant  had 
Lady  Margaret,  daughter  to  the  Duke  of  Clarence,  created  Countess  of  Salisbury 
by  Henry  VIII.  Thus  also  the  Lady  EUzabeth  Finch,  being  by  King  James  I. 
created  Viscountess  of  Maidstone ;  and  by  King  Charles  I.  Countess  of  Winchel- 
sea,  the  dignity  entailed  on  the  heirs-male  of  her  body  begotten.  Not  to  instance 
any  more,  I  shall  only  mention  the  wives  of  Henry  VIU.  who  was  very  liberal  in 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ^V. 


73 


bestowini:;  such  titles  and  arms  upon  his  favourites,  and  especially  his  wives.  His 
second  wife  Anne  Boleyne,  before  he  married  her,  to  qualify  her  for  his  bed,  he  ad- 
vanced to  the  dignity  of  Marchioness  of  Pembroke  ;  and  to  lionour  her  paternal 
bearing,  which  was  to  be  impaled  with  his  royal  one,  he  added  three  noble  coats  of 
arms  of  the  f;xrailics  of  the  royal  blood,  and  those  of  dignified  feus,  to  wit,  those  of 
Lancaster,  Angoulesme,  and  the  Dutchyof  Guienne,  which  were  all  marshalled  in  the 
chief  places  before  her  own  in  one  shield  :  as  Sandfjrd  in  his  Genealogical  History 
of  England. 

His  third  wife  being  Jane  Seymour,  daughter  of  Sir  John  Seymour,  he  honoured 
ber  family  with,  arms  composed  with  figures  of  the  royal  ensign,  and  created  her 
brother  Edward,  Lord  Beauchamp;  and  the  additament  of  honour  to  the  arms 
was,  or,  on  a  pile  j^a/cj-,  betwixt  six  flower-de-luces  azure  in  pale,  three  Wou^  passant 
gardant  of  the  first,  being  those  of  England,  which  were  quartered  by  his  succes- 
sors in  the  first  and  fourth  quarters,  before  the  paternal  arms  of  Seymour,  viz. 
azure,  two  wings  conjoined  in  lure  or,  as  carried  by  the  family  of  Seymour.  Duke 

of  SOMERS-ET. 

His  sixth  wife,  Katharine  Parr,  sister  of  William  Marquis  of  Northampton. 
was  not  only  honoured  in  her  own  person,  but  her  father's  family  also,  with  such 
another  coat  of  concession,  viz.  argent,  on  a.  pile  gules,  betwixt  six  roses  of  the 
last,  three  roses  of  the  first,  which  were  marshalled  in  the  first  place  before  the 
paternal  ones  of  Parr,  viz.  argent,  two.  bars  azure,  within  a  bordure  ingrailed 
sable. 

Queen  Elizabeth  was  more  sparing  in  granting  such  concessions  of  the  royal 
ensigns ;  nay,  on  the  cMitrary,  resented  the  using  of  them  with  their  own,  by 
those  who  had  right  to  them  to  show  their  maternal  descent,  albeit  agreeable  to 
the  approven  practice  of  England. 

This  resentment  was  specially  remarkable  on  the  descendants  of  Henry  VIL  as 
particularly  M.^y  Qj.ieen  of  Scotl.\nd,  great  grand-daughter  to  that  king,  by  his 
eldest  daughter  Margaret,  wife  to  King  James  IV.  of  Scotland,  for  showing  the 
maternal  descent  of  King  James  V.  her  father;  and  to  Frances  Brandon,  Dutchess 
of  Suffolk,  also  grand-daughter  to  the  same  King,  by  his  younger  daughter  Mary, 
widow  of  Lewis  XIL  of  France,  afterwards  married  to  Charles  Brandon  Duke  of 
Suffolk.  This  Dutchess,  durst  not,  during  her  hfetime,  show  her  maternal  descent : 
but  the  Queen  was  pleased  to  honour  her  funerals  with  a  coat  of  augmentation,  as 
by  her  order  and  warrant ;  which  I  have  inserted  verbatim  in  my  Essay  of  the 
Ancient  and  Modern  Use  of  Armories,  page  14S. 

From  which  may  be  observed,  first.  That  Ajms  of  Special  Concession  are 
the  ensigns  of  sovereignty,  or  pieces  of  them,  which  cannot  be  granted  by  heralds- 
without  a  special  warrant  from  the  sovereign.  Secondly,  That  such  arms  shall 
take  place  before  all  other  sorts  of  arms.  And.  thirdly,  Heralds  are  to  record  themi 
in  the  registers,  and  to  pass  them  in  all  solemnities. 

I  shall  only  add,  for  a  conclusion  of  this  section,  some  general  observes- fram 
Ashmole,  in  his  Institutions  of  the  Garter  ;.  "  That  the  Kings  of  England,  as  sove- 
"  reigns  of  that  order,  have  been  of  late  in  use  to  grant  to  the  Clinodial  Knights 
"  additional  arms  in  distinct  quarters  from  their  paternal  ones  on  their  banners,. 
"  (which  ought  to  hang  over  their  stalls,  lest  otherwise  they  should,  seem  too  na- 
"  ked),  as  King  James  L  of  Great  Britain  was  pleased  to  give  to  Robert  Carr 
"  Viscount  of  Rochester,  afterwards  Earl  of  Somerset,  whose  paternal  coat  being 
"  gules,  on  a  chsvevon  argent,  three  stars  of  the  first,  he  first  added  a  \\on  passanc 
"  gardant  or,  in  the  dexter  chief  point,  as  a  special  gift  of  favour,  being  one  of  the 
"  lions  of  England.  And  then,  says  oar  author,  a  new  invented  coat  to  be  borne 
"  quarterly,  being  quarterly  or  and  gules."  He  also  tells,  chap.  11.  sect.  7. 
"  King  James  granted  to  Sir  Thomas  Erskine  a  coat  of  augmentation  to  be  quar- 
"  with  his  paternal,  when  he  was  made  a  knight  of  that  order :"  But,  with  sub- 
mission to  that  learned  author,  that  coat  of  augmentation  of  Sir  Thomas  Erskine 
Earl  of  Kelly  was  granted  long  before,  upon  another  account  than  to  fill  up  his 
banner  when  made  a  Knight  of  the  Garter,  as  I  have  shown  before.  The  same 
learned  author  tells  us,  chap.  7.  sect.  2.  "  That  the  Garter,  the  principal  ensign  of 
"  that  order,  has  been  given  by  way  of  armory  (but  without  the  motto)  in  sun- 
"  dry  bearinsrs;  as  on  the  seal  of  arms  belonging  to  the  office  of  Garter  Principal 

Vol.  n.    "  T 


74  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ^c, 

"  King  of  Arms,  where  the  garter  surrounding  a  crown  (of  which  before  in  the 
"  section  of  Offices)  is  placed  in  chief  between  one  of  the  hons  of  England  and 
"  a  flower-de-luce  of  France.  And,  to  instance  families,  says  he,  we  find  ardent, 
"  three  demi-garters  azure,  buckled  and  garnished  or,  granted  by  King  Henry 
"  VIL  to  his  servant  Peter  Uarbon,  and  sable,  a  garter  between  three  buckles  of 
"  the  same,  to  be  borne  by  the  name  of  Buckland  or  Bowland,  in  the  county  of 
"  Northampton." 

Having,  1  suppose,  already  satisfied  my  reader  with  a  sufEcient  number  of  in- 
stances of  Arms  of  Special  Concession,  and  showed  their  nature  and  right  of  pre- 
cedency to  others,  as  being  originally  parts  of  the  ensigns  of  sovereignty,  and  only 
granted  by  sovereigns,  I  shall  proceed  to  speak  of  Feudal  Arms. 


OF  FEUDAL  ARMS,  OR  ARMS  OF  DIGNITIES. 

Amongst  the  many  ways  of  acquiring  arms,  that  of  noble  feus  and  territories  is 
one;  the  possessors  of  which  have  right  to  carry  those  figures  which  seem  to  be 
annexed  to  dignified  feus;  such  as  those  of  dukedoms,  marquisates,  earldoms,  and 
old  baronies,  which  the  possessors  carry  to  show  their  dignities  by  possession  of 
them,  by  right  of  succession,  or  grant  of  the  sovereign  ;  as  Hoppingius  de  yure 
Insigniinn,  paragraph  2.  "  Cum  feuda  nobilia  titulo  successionis  vel  beneficio 
"  domini  jus  &■  voluntatem  habentis,  insignia  conferri  &.  perfecte  acquin  palam 
"  est." 

Feudal  Anns,  in  my  humble  opinion,  were  originally  either  those  that  were 
granted  by  sovereigns  upon  the  erection  of  dignified  feus,  or  the  arms  of  the  old 
possessors,  which,  by  a  long  continuance,  seemed  to  be  annexed  to  the  feus :  as  in 
France,  Guienne,  an  appanage,  the  dukedoms  of  Burgundy  Ancient  and  Modern, 
the  counties  of  Vermandois,  Dreux,  Evereux,  Aubigny,  &c.  all  appanages  of  old 
of  the  sons  of  France,  and  have  for  arms  annexed  to  them  those  of  their  ancient 
possessors  the  sons  of  France,  who  failing  by  want  of  issue,  or  otherwise,  their  suc- 
cessors into  such  noble  feus,  though  strangers,  marshalled  the  arms  of  those  feus 
with  their  own,  by  the  favour  of  the  sovereign. 

With  us  I  shall  mention  some  feudal  arms  which  seem  to  be  annexed  to  eail- 
doms  and  lordships,  before  I  proceed  to  give  examples  of  others,  with  their  blazons, 
and  by  whom  now  carried.  The  earldom  of  Arran,  lordship  of  Lorn,  Orkney  and 
Caithness,  afterwards  earldoms,  the  arms  properly  belonging  to  them  of  old,  and 
now  still,  are  ships,  lymphads,  or  boats,  the  emblems  of  their  inhabitants,  trade, 
and  the  service  which  they  were  obliged  to  perform  to  their  sovereigns,  by  the 
reddendos  of  the  charters  of  those  noble  feus;  some  of  which  I  have  seen,  as  that 
of  Lorn,  viz.  unam  navim  viginti  remorum  si  petatur  tempore  belli:  being  obliged  to 
furnish  a  ship  of  twenty  oars  for  service  in  time  of  war,  when  required. 

Some  lawyers  are  of  opinion,  that  ignoble  persons,  in  possession  of  noble  feus, 
are  nobilitate  by  them,  and  may  carry  arms  at  their  pleasure  without  authority, 
providing  they  assume  them  not  {in  emulationem  alterius')  to  the  prejudice  of  others; 
because,  say  they,  every  man  may  choose  a  name  for  himself,  seeing  this  is  not 
forbidden  in  any  law;  as  Bartolus,  lib.  \.  Cod.  de  Dignitate;  and  Segoin  in  his 
Treatise  de  Regno  Italico,  lib.  7.  tells  us,  "  That  about  the  year  of  God  937,  the 
•'  Emperor  Otto  brought  in  a  custom  to  Italy,  by  which  the  ignuble  became  noble, 
"  by  possessing  noble  feus,  and  had  right  to  carry  arms;  but  still  this  was  thought 
"  to  be  done  with  the  special  consent  of  the  sovereign,  and  is  so  understood  by  the 
"  law  and  customs  of  all  nations."  Hoppingius  de  Jure  Insignium,  in  the  fore- 
cited  paragraph  3.  proposes  the  question,  and  answers  negative  thus :  "  An  autem 
"  ignobilis,  per  feudi  nobilis  consecutionem,  &.  talis  qui  ejus  feudi  arma  deferendi 
■'  potestatem  habeat  efficiatur.'  Respondetur  non."  Joan.  Gallus  tells  us  the  same, 
and  that  it  was  so  decided  and  determined  in  France  in  the  year  1282,  "  That 
"  none  could  carry  marks  of  dignity  and  honour  without  the  approbation  of  the 
"  sovereign."  And  the  anonymous  author  of  Observritiones  Genealogictr,  lib.  i. 
cap.  39.  tells  us,  by  the  custom  of  Flanders  and  other  countries,  though  noble 
feus  be  alienable  by  the  ancient  possessors  to  strangers,  the  dignity  cannot  pass  to 
them,  but  returns  to  the  sovereign :  And  the  same  holds  in  Britain,  that  those  who 


OF  RIARSHALLING  ARMS,  l^c 


75 


acquire  noble  feus,  the  dignity  of  them  must  be  granted  by  the  sovereign;  without 
which  grant  the  purchasers  cannot  use  the  arms  of  those  noble  feus;  for  arms, 
these  many  ages,  being  hereditary  marks  of  honour,  and  in  place  of  the  Roman 
statues,  cannot  be  assumed  without  the  consent  of  the  supreme  power. 

Though  arms  in  their  first  acceptation,  as  sym/w/a,  were  anciently  the  only  way 
of  expressing  things,  and  u^ed  to  distinguish  persons,  families,  and  communities,  or 
taken  up  at  pleasure  by  any  man  ;  yet  hath  that  liberty  for  many  ages  been  de- 
nied, and  made  the  rewards  and  ensigns  of  merit,  or  the  gracious  favours  of  princes, 
regularly  formed  and  disposed  in  a  comely  dress,  first  by  the  Germans,  where  arms 
are  said  by  some  to  have  begun,  as  their  terms,  regular  descriptions,  and  blazons 
did  in  France,  whom  all  Europe  have  imitated  therein.  1  shall  pass  by  then-  an- 
cient practices,  having  spoken  before  of  them,  and  where  I  have  omitted  in  Bri- 
tain, 1  shall  insist  a  little  on  those  in  England  and  more  fully  of  their  practice  in 
Scotland.  As  to  the  present  subject,  in  England,  none  were  allowed  arms  by  the 
laws  of  gentility,  but  those  that  have  either  right  to  them  by  descent  or  grant,  or 
purchased  them  from  the  badge  or  body  of  any  prisoner  they,  in  open  and  lawful 
war,  had  taken ;  of  which  1  have  given  some  instances  before. 

Therefore  Henry  V.  of  England  did  publish  by  proclamation,  "  That  no  man 
"  of  what  estate,  degree  or  condition  soever,  shall  assume  such  arms,  or  coats  of 
"  arms,  except  he  hold,  or  ought  to  hold  them  by  right  of  inheritance,  or  by  the 
"  donation  of  some  person  who  hath  sufficient  power  to  give  them;  and  that  he 
"  shall  make  it  appear  to  officers  appointed  by  us  for  that  purpose,  by  whose  right 
"  or  gift  he  enjoys  them,  except  those  that  bare  arms  with  us  at  the  battle  of 
"  Agincourt."  From  that  ingenious  gentleman  that  wrote  the  Introduction  to 
Guillim's  Display,  of  the  sixth  edition,  1  shall  here  add  the  words  of  the  law,  which 
the  author  gives  us  from  the  archives  in  the  Tower  of  London.  "  Qiiod  nullus 
"  cujuscunque  status,  gradus,  sen  conditionis  fuerit,  hujusmodi  arma,  sive  tunicas 
"  armorum  in  se  sumat,  nisi  ipse  jure  antecessorio  vel  ex  donatione  alicujus  ad  hoc 
"  sufficientera  potestatem  habentis,  ea  possideat  aut  possideie  debeat,  &.  quod  ipsa 
"  arma,  sive  tunicas  illas  ex  cujus  dono  obtinet,  demonstrationis  suk  personis  ad 
"  hoc  per  nos  assignatis  seu  assignandis  manifeste  demonstrat,  exseptis  illis  qui  no- 
"  biscum  apud  bellum  de  Agincourt  arma  portabant,"  &c.. 

By  which  it  is  plain  the  voluntary  assumption  of  arms  is  denied  by  the  Kings  of 
England;  and  which  is  also  done  by  the  Kings  of  Scotland,  by  the  125th  act, 
12.  Pari.  Jacob.  VI.;  of  which  more  particularly  in  another  place.  But  to  return 
to  feudal  arms,  and  their  particular  practice. 

Arms,  as  I  have  said  before,  were  anciently  taken,  not  only  as  marks  of  noble 
descent,  alliances,  offices  of  merit,  and  royal  favour,  but  also  of  right  to  feus,  terri- 
tories, jurisdiction,  and  other  valuable  things  in  possession,  or  of  pretension  to 
them.. 

Those  who  had  or  pretended  to  such  arms,  did  not  of  old  place  them  in  one 
shield,  but  carrying  sometimes  one,  and  sometimes  another,  (which  I  have  de- 
monstrated in  the  E^say  of  the  Ancient  and  Modern  Use  of  Arms,  chap.  3.  and 
elsewhere:)  They  came  in  use  to  carry  these  arms  in  diiferent  and  distinct  shields, 
and  other  military  furniture ;  which  gave  occasion  for  seals  to  be  made  with  two 
sides,  a  face,  and  a  reverse:  the  face  where  a  man  is  represented  in  a  tiirone, 
or  on  horseback,  with  a  shield  of  arms,  called  the  royal  or  equestrian  side  of 
the  seal,  and  the  other  side,  called  the  reverse,  another  shield  of  different  arms. 

Ordinarily,  before  the  use  of  marshalling  many  arms  in  oni  shield,  there  were 
distinct  arms  on  tire  equestrian  side,  where  a  man  is  represented  on  horseback  in 
his  surcoat,  upon  which  were  arms  different  from  those  on  the  caparisons  of  his 
horse;  and  they  again  from  those  on  the  shield  or  buckler  winch  he  carried  upon 
his  left  arm:  And,  upon  the  other  side  of  the  seal,  called  the  ;fi'c'/j-(f,  ordinarily 
the  paternal  or  principal  coat  of  arms,  accompanied  with  other  shields  of  arms, 
commonly  called  collateral  shields,  because  placed  at  the  sides,  or  below  the  prin- 
cipal or  paternal  ensign,  Vi-hich  they  did  accompany  upon  the  account  of  al- 
liance, office,  or  territories;  as  may  be, seen  on  foreign  seals  and  coins^  especially 
dollars. 

To  illustrate  this  practice  I  shall  bring  a  few  examples  from  Olivarius  Uredus's 
Collections  of  the  Seals  of  the  Earls  of  Flanders ;  and  I  shall  mention  the  like  in 


76  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  tic. 

England  and  Scotland.  Baldwin  Count  of  Hainault  and  Marquis  of  Namur,  his: 
seal  had  two  sides,  face  and  reverse;  on  the  first  was  a  man  on  horseback  brandish 
ing  a  sword,  and  about  his  neck  hung  a  shield  of  arms,  bendy  sinister  of  six  pieces, 
for  the  earldom  of  Hainault ;  and,  on  the  reverse,  a  shield  of  arms  charged  with 
two  cheverons,  as  Marquis  of  Namur,  in  anno  1178.  He  married  Margaret,  sister 
and  heir  of  Philip  Earl  of  Flanders ;  she  bore  to  him  Baldwin  Earl  of  Flanders, 
who  left  two  heiresses,  Jean  and  Margaret;  the  first  married  to  Ferdinand  son  of 
Sanctius  King  of  Lusitania,  anno  i2n:  He  had  on  his  seal  of  arms,  upon  the  ons 
side,  a  man  on  horseback  in  his  coat-armour,  or  surtout,  barruly  of  ten  pieces 
the  arms  of  Lusitania,  and  on  his  left  arm  a  shield  charged  with  the  Lion  of  Flan 
ders ;  and,  on  the  reverse,  or  other  side  of  the  seal,  the  ancient  arms  of  Hannonia, 
three  cheverons;  so  that  there  were  three  coats  of  arms  upon  one  seal;  which  I 
have  mentioned  before,  with  others,  page  30. 

Other  great  men  in  that  country,  and  in  the  countries  near  thereto,  continued 
all  the  arms  they  had  right  to,  but  placed  them  at  the  sides,  or  round  their  proper 
arms  in  the  middk ;  and  in  later  time  they  have  heaped  them  up  in  one  shield 
by  way  of  marshalling.  I  shall  here  add  what  the  German  Hoppingius  de  Jure 
Insignium,  paragraph  3.  says,  "  Vix  enim  ullus  in  &-  extra  imperium  invenitur 
"  princeps,  comes,  baro,  qui  non  suum,  ex  diversis  feudis  regahbus,  in  quibus 
*'  ipse  vel  majores  ejus  successerunt,  auctum  habeat  clypeum." 

Sandford,  in  his  Genealogical  History,  gives  us  several  instances  of  this  practice 
of  old  in  England;  some  of  which  I  have  given  in  this  Treatise,  chap.  2.  and  of 
the  same  in  Scotland,  and  shall  here  add  one  from  Sir  George  Mackenzie's 
Science  of  Heraldry,  chap.  27.  page  88.  viz.  the  achievement  of  the  Lord  Bre- 
chin, of  old,  being  three  shields,  one  upright,  the  other  two  collateral  ones  lying 
horizontally,  all  conjoined  at  three  points;  the  uppermost  argent,  an  eagle  dis- 
played, with  an  arrow  through  its  breast,  gules;  the  second  shield,  on  the  right 
side,  argent,  three  piles  (or  rather  the  passion-nails  of  our  saviour)  conjoined  in 
point  gules ;  the  third  shield,  azure,  three  garbs  or,  the  feudal  arms  of  the  earldom 
of  Buchan. 

I  shall  add  here  a  deduction  of  the  ancient  and  great  family  of  Brechin  Lord 
Brechin,  and  how  it  came  to  terminate  into  the  family  of  Maule  EarLof  Pan-- 
mure. 

David  Earl  of  Huntingdon  in  England,  and  Earl  of  Garioch  and  Lord  Brechih 
in  Scotland,  brother  to  King  William  the  Lion,  both  grandsons  to  King  David  L. 
carried,  according  to  Sir  John  Feme,  argent,  an  escutcheon  within  a  double  tres, 
sure  flowered  and  counter-flowered  ^a/^j-.  What  authority  Sir  John  Feme  had  for 
assigning  these  arms  to  Earl  David  I  know  not,  but  to  several  of  his  charters 
(Collect,  of  Charters  in  the  Cotton  Library)  his  seal  is  appended,  having  the  pic- 
ture of  a  man  on  horseback,  and  on  his  arm  a  shield,  charged  with  three  piles 
issuing  from  the  chief,  and  conjoined  by  the  points  in  base.  He  died  in  England, 
anno  111%  (Dugdale's  Baronage)  and  left  his  lordship  of  Brechin  to  Henry  his 
natural  son,  from  which  he  took  his  surname. 

This  Henry  Lord  Brechin,  and  his  descendants,,  used  Ear  their  armorial  bearing, 
or,  three  piles  j'«/f.r,  as  still  carried  by  the  Earls  of  Panmure;  as  appears  by  an  an- 
cient collection  of  ordinaries  in  the  Cotton  Library.  He  is  witness  to  a  charter  of 
King  William  to  Malcolm  Earl  of  Fife,  where  he  is  called  Henrico  Jilio  comitis 
David  fratris  mei ;  and  John  Earl  of  Chester,  his  brother,  in  a  donation  to  the 
canons  of  St  Andrew's,  designs  him  Henricus  de  Brechin,  filius  comitis  DaVid;  and  the 
same  Earl  John,  in  a  mortification  to  the  monks  of  Aberbrothock,  calls  hiro 
Henrico  de  Brechin  fratre  meo.  (Register  of  St  Andrew's  Priory,  and  Chartulary  of 
Aberbroth.)     By  Julian  his  wife  he  had, 

William  Lord  Brechin,  who  founded  the  Maison  Dieu,  or  St  Mary's  Hospital  of 
Brechin,  for  the  salvation  of  the  souls  of  WilHam  and  Alexander  Kings  of  Scotland, 
John  Earl  of  Chester  and  Huntingdon  his  uncle,  Henry  his  father,  and  Julian  his 
mother:  And  in  the  foundation-charter  designs  \nmse.\i  IVillehmis  de  Brechin,  filius 
Henrici  de  Brechin,  filii  comitis  David.  (Confirm,  by  King  James  HI.  in  1477, 
wherein  the  original  is  transumed.)  He  is  a  witness  with  Alexander  Stewart  of 
Scotland,  and  David  de  Graham,  to  a  charter  of  David  Bishop  of  St  Andrews  to 
ihe  monks  of  Paisley,  in  1247,  and  stiled  Willelmo  de  Brechin,  barone  et  militej 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ^c.  77 

(Chartul.  of  Paisley.)  ^mio  1254,  he  was  an  arbitrator  betwixt  the  Abbot  (.^f 
Aberbrothock  and  Peter  de  Maule  Lord  ot"  Panmure,  concerning  the  marches  of 
the  baronies  of  Aberbrothock  and  Panmure,  which  the  Earl  of  iiuchan,  Justiciar 
of  Scotland,  by  the  king's  special  command,  had  perambulated.  (Chart,  of  Aber- 
broth.)  Further,  in  1255,  he  was  one  of  the  iVIagnates,  with  whose  counsel,  « 
aliorum  pluriuin  baronmn,  the  king  gave  commission  to  the  Earls  of  Monteith, 
Buchan,  and  Marr,  to  treat  with  the  English.  (Rymer's  Fosdera.)  He  was  also 
one  of  K.ing  Alexander  IlL  his  Privy  Counsellors,  and  one  of  the  regents  of  the 
kingdom  in  his  minority,  deputed  ad  gubernationem  rcgui,  ct  custodiam  corporis  re- 
pis  et  regime.  (^Ibid.)  And,  in  the  year  1283,  one  of  the  froceres  Hcoticc,  who 
obliged  themselves  to  receive  Margaret  of  Norway  as  heir  of  the  crown,  failing 
issue-male  of  the  king's  body.  {Ibid.')  This  great  lord  married  a  daughter  of 
William  Cumin  Earl  of  Buchan,  Justiciar  of  Scotland.  (Andrew  Winton's  MS. 
Hist.)  And  most  probably  those  are  his  arms  given  by  Sir  George  Mackenzie  in 
his  Science  of  Heraldry,  page  88.  which  he  calls  Lord  Brechin,  of  old,  with  an  an- 
tique mantling,  where  there  are  three  shields  of  arms;  that  on  the  right  has  the 
arms  of  Lord  Brechin,  as  blazoned  above;  that  on  the  left  the  arms  of  Buchan, 
his  wife's  family;  and  the  third  shield  is  charged  with  an  eagle  displayed,  pierced 
with  an  arrow,  which  perhaps  were  his  mother's  arms,  whose  family  is  not  well 
known:  And  this  practice  of  collateral  shields  was  frequent  in  Scotland  before  the 
use  of  marshallmg;  for  which  see  my  Essay  on  the  Ancient  and  Modern  Use  of 
Armories,  page  55.  But  the  similitude  of  the  Lord  Brechin's  bearing  with  that  of 
the  name  of  Wisehart,  has  led  Sir  George  Mackenzie  into  the  mistake  of  calhng 
Lord  Brechin  the  VVisharts,  whose  arms  are  carried  by  the  Marquis  of  Douglas ; 
whereas  none  of  that   name  ever  were  concerned  with  the  lordship  of  Brechui,  or 

used  that  title.     By Cumin,  his  wife,  William  Lord  Brechin  had  for  his 

son  and  successor 

David  Lord  Brechin,  who  is  found  in  the  Ragman's  Roll  among  those  who 
swore  fealty  to  Edward  L  King  of  England  in  1296,  (Prynne's  Hist.);  and  was  one 
of  the  great  barons  of  Scotland  whom  King  Edward  required  to  attend  him  with 
their  men,  horses,  and  arms,  into  France,  1297;  but  the  same  year  he  was  allowed 
to  return  home,  upon  giving  his  obligation  to  arm  himself,  and  return  again  to  the 
king's  service,  dated  at  Maghefeld  30th  of  May,  and  25th  of  King  Edward's  reign. 
{Fcedera  Anglice.)  He  was  at  many  of  the  battles  fought  after  Baliol's  renuncia- 
tion, particularly  at  that  of  Methven  in  1306,  where  he  took  Sir  Simon  Eraser 
prisoner.  {Fcedera.)  And  in  1308  he  was  one  of  King  Edward's  council,  from 
whom  he  gets  a  letter  thanking  him  for  his  past  services,  and  encouraging  him  to 
continue  consilium  et  auxilium  suum  in  his  service.  (Fcedera,  Vol.  111.)  He  con- 
tinued on  the  Enghsh  side,  with  his  relations  the  Cumins,  till  the  battle  of  In- 
verury,  where  this  Lord  Brechin,  the  Earl  of  Buchan,  and  Sir  John  Mowbray, 
commanded  the  army,  which  was  routed  by  King  Robert :  Upon  which  the  Lord 
Brechin  retired  to  his  castle  of  Brechin,  which  he  had  garrisoned ;  but  being  be- 
sieged by  the  Earl  of  Athol  he  made  his  peace  with  the  king,  (Barbour's  Life  of 
Robert  Bruce,  p.  168.)  and  ever  aft>;r  continued  most  loyal,  having  married  a  sister 
of  King  Robert  I.  and  daughter  of  Robert  de  Bruce  Earl  of  Carnck,  (Buchanan) 
by  whom  he  had  David  his  successor,  Thomas  Brechin  of  Lumquhat,  forfeited 
with  his  brother,  (Inventory  of  the  Registers)  and  a  daughter,  Margaret,  married 
to  Sir  David  Barclay,  knight,  in  1315;  as  appears  by  his  charter  of  that  date,  "  Mar- 
"  garetie  filias  domini  David  de  Brechin,  de  terns  de  Cairny,  Barclay,  &c.  pro  ma- 
"  trim.onio  inter  eos  contrahendo."     (Penes  C.  de  Panmure.) 

Which  David  Lord  Brechin,  his  son,  called  the  Flower  of  Chivalry,  in  his  youth 
went  to  the  Holy  Land,  and  signalized  himself  against  the  Saracens.  (Buchanan.) 
In  the  1323  he  is  one  of  the  barous  who  wrote  that  bold  letter  to  the  pope,  in  be- 
half of  King  Robert  Brace,  and  the  independency  of  Scotland  ;  but  next  year,  viz. 
1321,  he  was  unhappily  made  privy  to  the  Countess  of  Strathern  and  the  Lord 
Soulis'  conspiracy  against  the  king  his  uncle;  for  not  discovering  of  which  he  was 
tried  at  the  Fai-liament,  called  the  Black  Parliament,  and  sutfered  death,  to  the 
universal  regret  of  the  people,  being  the  king's  nephew,  "  Et  omnium  aetatis  suae 
"  juvenum,  ec  b.;lli,  St  pacis  artibus  longe  primus,"  says  Buchanan.  This  power- 
ful lord,  at  his  forfeiture,  possessed  the  lordship  of  Brechin,  the  barony  of  Rothe- 

VoL.  II.  U 


73  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  y^. 

may,  the  lands  of  Kinloch,  and  part  of  Glenesk;  all  which  were  given  by  King 
Robert  Bruce  to  Sir  Cvid  Barclay,  (Inventory  of  the  Registers)  who  had  mar- 
ried the  Lord  Brechin's  sister. 

Which  David  Barchiy  Lord  Brechin  had,  for  his  paternal  estate,  the  barony  of 
old  Lindores,  and  lanas  of  Cairny  in  Fife,  out  of  which  he  and  Margaret  Brechin, 
his  wife,  gave  a  fishii/g  in  pure  alms  to  the  monks  of  Balmerino.  (Regist.  of  Bal- 
merino.)  He  was  H.gh  Sheriff  of  Fife,  (Sibbald's  Hist,  of  Fife)  and  was  famous 
in  the  wars  of  King  I'.obert  Bruce,  with  whom  he  was  present  at  most  of  his 
battles,  particularly  Mtthven,  where  he  was  taken  prisoner.  (Barbour,  p.  32.) 
He  is  also  fre(]uently  mentioned  in  the  wars  of  King  David  Bruce,  whom  he  faith- 
fully adhered  to;  and,  in  1^41,  by  that  king's  command,  seized  Sir  William 
Bullock,  Chamberlain  of  Scotland,  suspected  of  treason,  and  committed  him  to 
prison;  but  afterwards  having  a  feud  with  the  Douglasses,  he  was  murdered  at 
Aberdeen  in  1350  by  John  of  St  Michael  and  his  accomplices,  at  the  instigation  of 
William  Douglas  of  Liddesdale;  as  related  by  Fordun,  who  calls  him  Nobilis 
vir  et  potens  dominus  David  de  Barclay  miles.  (Hearne's  Scoticbronicon,  Vol.  IV. 
p.  1040.)  By  Margaret  Brechin,  his  wife,  he  left  David  his  heir,  and  Jean,  mar- 
ried to  Sir  David  Fleming  of  Biggar,  by  whom  he  had  a  daughter,  Marion, 
the  wife  of  Sir  William  Maule  of  Panmure;  as  appears  by  a  charter  of  this  Wil- 
liam to  Marion  Fleming,  his  wife,  the  daughter  of  Sir  David  Fleming,  of  his  lands 
of  Scryne,  &.c.  confirmed  by  King  Robert  II.  ad  annum  1381.  {Penes  C.  de 
Panmure.) 

David,  next  Lord  Brechin,  by  his  charter  sine  data,  grants  his  Lands  of  Kyndest- 
lyth,  to  be  held  of  him  and  his  heirs,  to  Hugh  Barclay  his  cousin,  son  to  David 
Barclay  his  uncle,  from  whom  Collerny  is  descended  :  {Chart,  penes  Hen.  Barclay 
de  CuUerny.')  And  in  1363,  he  grants  a  charter  of  confirmation  of  the  lands  of 
Dunmure,  lying  in  his  barony  of  Lindores,  to  Roger  Mortimer.  {Penes  C.  de. 
Panmure.)  He  went  to  the  wars  of  Pmssia,  for  which  he  obtained  a  safe  conduct 
from  Edward  III.  of  King  England,  to  pass  through  his  dominions,  attended  with 
twelve  esquires,  an4  their  horses  and  servants,  dated  in  1364,  the  37th  of  Edward  III. 
(Extract  from  the  Tower  of  London.)  And  after  his  return  he  is  also  mentioned 
in  the  wars  of  King  David  Bruce.  By  Jean  his  wife  he  left  one  daughter,  Mar- 
garet, his  heir,  who  was  married  to  Walter  Stewart,  second  son  to  King  Robert  II. 
by  Euphame  Ross  his  queen.     (Chart,  in  pub.  .Archiv.) 

This  Walter  is  first  designed  in  charters  Lord  Brechin  only;  but  afterwards  he 
comes  to  have  the  titles  of  Palatine  of  Stratheru,  Earl  of  Athol  and  Caithness,  and 
Lord  Brechin :  And  by  the  foresaid  Margaret,  his  wife,  he  had  David  Stewart,  who 
died  an  hostage  in  England  for  the  ransom  of  King  James  I.  and  Allan  Earl  of 
Caithness,  killed  at  the  battle  of  Inverlochy  in  1430,  without  issue.  {Scoticbroni- 
con.) But  the  Earl  of  Athol,  though  his  lady  died  before  himself,  kept  possession 
of  this  lordship  till  the  1437,  when  he  was  executed  for  the  murder  of  King 
James  I.;  at  which  time  Sir  Thomas  Maule  of  Panmure  laid  claim  to  the  estate  of 
the  Lord  Brechin,  as  heir  to  Margaret  Countess  of  Athol.  heiress  of  Brechin,  to 
whose  heirs  it  had  been  provided  by  a  charter  19th  October  1378;  {in  pub.  jirchiv.) 
and  took  instrument  upon  the  Earl's  declaration,  before  his  execution,  that  he  pos- 
sessed the  lordship  of  Brechin  only  by  the  courtesy.  {Instrum.  Penes  C.  de  Pan- 
mure.) And  that  same  year  Thomas  Bisset  of  Bdwylo  makes  oath  judicially, 
"  That  David  Lord  Brechin,  father  to  the  Countess  of  Athol,  had  no  brothers,  and 
"  but  one  sister,  Jean  Barclay,  the  v/ife  of  Sir  David  Fleming,  and  grandmother 
"  to  Sir  Thomas  Maule,  killed  at  the  Harlaw."  {Penes  C.  de  Panmure.)  And  the 
said  Sir  Thomas  Maule,  in  1442,  takes  a  notorial  transumpt  of  the  above  charter 
of  Dunmure  by  David  Lord  Brechin,  to  preserve  and  show  his  right  to  the  su- 
periority of  those  lands,  as  heir  to  the  said  Lord  Brechin;  notwithstanding  of 
which  the  family  of  Panmure  got  possession  only  of  the  lands  of  Hetherwick, 
Leuchlands,  Jackston  and  Staddockmuir,  parts  of  the  Brechin  estate;  and  the 
Privy  Council  in  King  James  II.  his  minority,  caused  annex  the  lordship  of  Bre- 
chin to  the  crown,  on  pretence  of  Athol's  forfeiture;  (Acts  of  Parliament)  and  in 
1487,  James,  the  king's  second  son,  amongst  other  titles,  was  created  Lord  Bre-- 
ehin. 


Of  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  Wc. 


79 


But  this  lordship  being  sometime  after  again  dissolved  from  tlie  crown,  has  now 
been  a  considerable  time  enjoyed  by  the  family  of  Panmure,  who  are  heirs  of 
olood  to  the  ancient  Lords  Bkechin,  whose  title  tliey  carry,  together  with  their 
arms,  viz.  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  azure,  a  cheveron  betwixt  three  crosses  patee 
a;yc77r,  for  Barclay;  second  and  third  s/-,  three  pdes  issuing  from  the  cliief,  con- 
joined by  tlie  points  in  base  gules,  for  Brechin,  which  are  placed  irL  the  third 
quarter  of  the  Earls  of  Panmure's  shield  of  arras,  as  blazoned  page  49.  of  this 
volume. 

Most  of  our  ancient  earldoms,  and  some  of  our  old.  lordships  have,  as  it  were, 
armorial  ensigns  annexed  to  them  ;  which  were  eitlier  those  granted  upon  their 
erection,  into  noble  feus,  or  those  of  the  ancient  possessors,  and,  by  the  favour  of  the 
sovereign,  are  transmitted  with  the  dignity  of  the  feu  to  other  different  families, 
who,  by  modern  practice,  quarter  the  arms  of  these  dignities  conferred  on  them 
with  their  proper  arms,  merely  as  feudal  ones,  and  not  upon  the  account  of  descent 
or  alliance  with  the  ancient  possessors  of  these  dignified  feus,  nor  upon  the  ac- 
count of  special  concession,  patronage,  or  otherwise,  but  only  as  invested  in  these 
noble  feus  :  So  that  we  meet  with  distinct  families  carrying  one  coat  of  arms,  but 
upon  different  accounts  ;  as  by  many  instances  in  tte  former,  and  in  this  Vo- 
lume, to  which  I  shall  add  a  considerable  number  here,  to  show  the  honour  and 
dignity  of  our  ancient  and  modern  families. 

I  begin-  with  the  name  Cuming  or  Cumin,  once  a  numerous  and  powerful  fami- 
ly, whose  arms  were  azure,  three  garbs  or.  The  most  emipent  family  of  the  name 
was  dignified  with  the  Earldom  of  Bochan  ;  which  noble  family  came  to  a  period 
in  the  reign  of  Robert  Bruce,  upon  the  account  of  their  rebellion  in  adhering  to 
the  interest  of  England;  (a  branch  of  v.'hich  family  now  remaining  is  Cumin  of 
Coulter,  wlio  carries  the  above  arms  to  show  his  descent;  see  Appendix,  page  58. 
and  Plate  of  Achievements)  and  their  arms  ever  since  became  the  feudal  ensigns  of 
the  earldom  of  Buchan,  to  several  different  families  who  were  honoured  with  the 
title  of  that  earldom. 

The  first  that  I  have  found  to  carry  them,  as  such,  was  Alexander.  Stewart, 
fourth  son  of  King  Robert  II.  when  created  Earl  of  Buch,\n  by  his  father,  who,  by 
our  old  books  of  blazon,  carried,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  Stewart,  or,  a  fesse 
cheque,  azure  and  argent  ;  second  and  thu'd  azure,  three  garbs  or,  as  the  feudal 
arms  of  the  earldom  of  Buchan :  After  his  death,  having  no  lawful  issue,  that 
dignity  returned  again  to  the  crown.  Afterwards  King  Robert  III.  invested  John, 
second  son  to  Robert  Duke  of  Alb.any,  Earl  of  Fife  and  Monteith,  in  the  earl- 
dom of  Buchan,  who  carried  then  the  arms  of  Scotland,  quartered  with  the  feudal 
arms  of  Buchan  ;  as  in  the  First  Volume,  page  48. 

King  James  II.  bestowed  the  earldom  of  Buchan  upon  his  uterine-brother  James 
Stewart,  second  son  to  James  Stewart,  called  the  black  Knight  of  Lorn,  and  his 
Lady,  Jean  Beaufort,  Queen  Dowager  of  King  James  I. 

Which  James  Earl  of  Buchan  married  Margaret,  daughter  and  heiress  of  Ogil^ 
VIE  of  AucHTERHOusE  :  By  her  he  had  Alexander  Earl  of  Buchan,  and  Lord 
Auchterhouse,  who  carried,  as  in  our  old  books  of  blazon,  quarterly,  first  and 
fourth  or,  a  fesse  cheque,  azure  and  or;  secopd  and  third  azure,  three  garbs  or,  for 
the  Earldom  of  Buchan:  But  the  German  writer  Jacob  Imhoff,  upon  what  reason 
I  know  not,  speaking  of  this  family,  makes  the  fesse  cheque  sable  and  argent,  and 
accom.panies  it  with  three  wolves'^  heads  erased  ,f///cj-.  Alexander  Earl  of  Buchan's 
grandson,  viz.  John,  Master  of  Buchan,  was  killed  at  the  battle  of  Pinky  :  His 
estate  and  dignity  came  to  Christian  his  daughter  and  sole  heir,  who  was  married 
to  Robert  Douglas,  son  of  AViUiam  Douglas  of  Lochleven,  a  younger  brother  of 
William  Earl  of  Morton.  Tiieir  son  was  James  Douglas  Earl  of  Bucii.\n.  who 
carried,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  Douglas  of  Lochleven,  viz.  argent,  three  piles 
issuing  from  a  ch\&i gules,  charged  with  two  stars  of  the  first;  second  azure,  three 
garbs  or,  for  the  earldom  of  Buchan;  third  or,  a  fesse  cheque,  azure  and  argent,  for 
Stewart.  And  he  having  but  one  daughter,  Mary,  his  heir,  who  was  wife  to  James 
Erskine,  eldest  son  of  John  Earl  of  Marr,  by  hi.-;  second  lady  Mary  Stewart,  daughter 
of  Esme  Duke  of  Lennox  :  James  Er5kine,  in  his  wife's  riglit,  was  Earl  of  Buchan, 
and  carried,  quarterly,  first  Buchan;  second  Stewart;  third  Stewart  of  Lennox, 
upon  the  account  of  his  mother;  and  fourth  Douglas  of  Lochleven,  upon  the  ac- 


ao  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  iSc. 

count  of  his  wife,  as  just  now  blazoned  ;  and  over  all,  by  way  of  an  inescutcheon, 
the  arms  of  Marr  and  Erskine,  quarterly;  as  in  Plate  7.  fig.  3.  in  the  Ancient  and 
Modern  Use  of  Armories :  so  that  he  carried  both  feudal  coats  of  arms,  arms  of 
alliance  and  descent.  The  issue  of  this  family  failed,  and  David  Erskine,  eldest  son 
of  Henry  Erskine  Lord  Cardross,  whose  progenitor  was  Henry,  immediate  younger 
brother  of  James  Earl  of  Buchan,  by  his  wife  Mary  Douglas,  heiress  of  the  earldom 
of  Buchan  as  above,  was,  by  the  Parliament  of  Scotland,  declared  Earl  of  Buchan, 
and  took  his  place  in  Parliament  according  to  the  seniority  of  the  Earls  of  Buchan. 
But  more  of  him  and  the  cadets  of  the  family  with  their  arms,  in  the  First  Volume, 
page  40.  and  his  achievements  in  tai/le  douce,  Plate  IV. 

The  old  Earls  of  Athol  carried  paly  of  six  pieces  argent  and  sable.  This  an- 
cient and  noble  family,  for  want  of  issue-male  or  otherwise,  came  to  the  Cumins, 
and,  upon  their  forfeiture,  returned  to  the  crown,  the  fountain  of  all  honour.  Ro- 
bert II.  conferred  that  earldom  upon  Walter  Stewart  his  second  son.  He  carried 
the  arms  of  Athol,  quartered  as  feudal  ones  with  his  paternal :  but  being  forfeited 
as  one  of  the  murderers  of  King  James  I,  that  earldom  was  again  annexed  to  the 
crown. 

King  James  II.  bestowed  that  earldom  upon  his  uterine-brother  John  Stewart, 
the  black  Knight  of  Lorn,  and  Jean  Queen  Dowager :  John  the  then  Earl  of 
Athol  carried,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  Stewart ;  second  and  third  paly  of  six 
pieces,  argent  and  sable,  for  the  title  of  Athol  ;  as  did  his  descendants,  till  that 
dignity  came  to  Murray  Earl  of  Tullibardin,  now  Duke  of  Athql,  who  now 
carries  those  arms  as  feudal  ones  j  of  which  before.  Volume  First,  page  50.  and 
248. 

The  old  Earls  of  Marr,  of  the  same  name,  had  for  arms  azure,  a  bend  between- 
six  cross  croslets  fitched  or,  vvhich  became  feudal  ones  to  other  families,  who 
were  honoured  with  the  earldom  of  Marr  ;  for  which  see  Volume  First,  page 
127. 

The  arms  of  the  old  Earls  of  March  and  Dunear  became  the  feudal  arms  of  that 
earldom  to  other  families  that  were  honoured  with  that  dignity,  after  it  was  an- 
nexed to  the  crown  by  King  Robert  III.  upon  the  forfeiture  of  George  Dunbar 
Earl  of  March.  King  James  II.  created  Alexander  his  second  son  Duke  of  Al- 
bany, Earl  of  March,  Lord  Annandale,  and  of  the  Isle  of  Man  :  Upon  which  ac- 
count he  carried  the  arms  of  those  dignities  quarterly  ;  first  the  arms  of  Scotland 
entire ;  second  gules,  a  lion  rampant  argent,  within  a  bordure  of  the  last,  charged 
with  eight  roses  of  the  first,  for  the  earldom  of  March  ;  third  gules,  three  legs  of  a 
man  armed  proper,  conjoined  in  the  centre  at  the  upper  parts  of  the  thighs,  flexed 
in  a  triangle,  garnished  and  spurred  or,  the  arms  of  the  Isle  of  Man ;  fourth  or,  a 
saltier  and  ch\et' gules,  the  feudal  arms  of  the  Lordship  of  Annandale,  which  were 
on  his  seals ;  and  at  this  day  are  to  be  seen  entire  on  the  College-church  of  Edin- 
burgh, to  which  he  was  a  benefactor.  This  duke  was  twice  married  ;  first  to  Ka- 
tharine Sinclair,  daughter  to  William  Earl  of  Orkney  :  she  bore  to  him  a  son 
Alexander,  who  married  Margaret,  daughter  of  the  Lord  Crichton,  and  had  a  daugh- 
ter married  to  David  Lord  Drummond.  Alexander  Duke  of  Albany,  &.c.  after  his 
Biarriage,  entered  into  religious  orders,  was  abbot  of  Inchaffray  and  Scoon,  and 
afterwards  Bishop  of  Murray.  He  resigned  his  temporal  honours  in  favours  of  his 
younger  brother  John  Duke  of  Albany,  son  of  the  foresaid  Alexander  Duke  of 
Albany,  by  his  second  wife,  a  daughter  of  the  house  of  Bologne.  This  John  Duke 
of  Albany,  Earl  of  March,  Lord  Annandale,  of  the  Isle  of  Man,  Count  of  Bologne, 
and  Count  of  Auvergne,  was  Governor  of  Scotland  for  several  years  in  the  minority 
of  King  James  V.  He  carried  on  his  seal  of  arms  as  his  father,  before  blazoned. 
I  have  seen  a  large  piece  of  gold,  coined  in  the  year  1524 ;  upon  the  one  side  is  an 
eagle  displayed,  and  diademate,  and  below,  it  an  escutcheon,  quarterly,  as  before, 
impaled  with  the  arms  of  his  dutchess,  Anne  de  la  Tour  and  Auvergne,  viz. 
quarterly,  first  and  fourth  seme  of  France,  a  tower,  for  the  Count  de  la  Tour  ; 
second  and  third  argent,  a  gonfannon^w/ex,  the  gonfannon  (/.  e.  the  banner  of  the 
church,  which  I  have  described  in  the  First  Volume,  page  406,  and  caused  cut  it 
in  Copperplate  IX.  fig.  20.),  and  over  all  an  inescutcheon,  charged  with  three 
torteauxes,  for  Bologne  ;  which  shield  of  arms  was  adorned  with  a  ducal  co- 
ronet, r 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ^c.  8i 

This  duke  died  without  issue  and  his  dignities  returned  to  their  respective  so- 
vereigns ;  but  the  titles  of  March  and  iVIan  were  given,  with  the  arms  of  those 
dignities,  to  the  family  of  Lennox  and  Lord  Darnly  ;  so  that  I  shall  here  add  briefly 
these  ensigns  as  an  example  of  feudal  arms. 

Henry  Lord  Darnly,  the  eldest  son  of  Matthew  Earl  of  Lennox,  before  he  was 
married  to  Mary  Queen  of  Scotland,  being  created  Duke  of  Rothsay,  Earl  of  Ross, 
and  Lord  of  the  Isle  of  Man,  had  the  arms  of  the  last  two  dignified  feus  marshall- 
ed with  those  of  the  family,  and  as  husband  to  Queen  Mary,  viz.  quarterly,  first 
and  fourth  azure,  three  flower-de-luces  or,  within  a  bordure  gules,  charged  with 
eight  buckles  of  the  second,  for  Aubigny  and  Evereux  in  France;  second  and 
third  or,  a  fesse  cheque  azure  and  argent,  for  Stewart  ;  over  all,  by  way  of  surtout, 
argent,  a  saltier  ingrailed,  cantoned  with  four  roses  gules,  for  the  earldom  of  Lennox. 
But  I  shall  here  give  Prince  Henry's  arms,  as  they  stand  cut  and  illuminate  on  his 
mother's  tomb  in  Westminster,  viz.  quarterly,  first  quarter  counter-quartered,  Au- 
bigny (or  Evereux  as  before)  with  Stewart,  and  in  surtout  the  arms  of  Lennox,  as 
his  father  before  ;  second  quarter  the  arms  of  the  Isle  of  Man,  as  before  blazoned; 
third  quarter  gules,  three  lions  rampant  argent,  for  the  earldom  of  Ross ;  and  in  the 
fourth  quarter  the  arms  of  Douglas  Earl  of  Angus,  being  those  of  his  mother.  Upon 
what  account  the  Enghsh  placed  them  there  I  know  not,  for  she  was  not  an 
heiress ;  but  with  us,  in  our  books  of  blazons  illuminate,  they  were  counter-quar- 
tered as  the  first.  All  which  are  impaled  with  the  royal  arms  of  Scotland,  sup- 
ported on  the  right  side  with  a  wolf,  proper,  and  on  the  left  by  the  unicorn  of 
Scotland,  and  the  achievement  ensigned  with  the  imperial  crown  of  Scotland. 
The  arms  of  the  family  of  Lennox,  more  fully  deduced,  may  be  seen  in  my 
book  of  the  Ancient  and  Modern  Use  of  Arms,  and  there  cut  in  copperplate, 
chap.  15. 

The  estate  and  dignities  of  the  earldom  of  Lennox  devolved  by  right  of  succes- 
sion on  Robert,  who  was  Bishop  of  Caithness,  and  after  him  on  his  nephew  Charles, 
second  son  of  Matthew  Earl  of  Lennox,  who,  as  Earl  Matthew's  brother  apd 
successor,  carried  both  quarterly  ;  first  Aubigny  ;  second  Stewart  ;  third  the  arms 
of  the  earldom  of  March  ;  fourth  as  the  first;  and  over  all,  in  surtout,  the  arms  of 
the  earldom  of  Lennox,  before  blazoned,  being  feudal  arms  ;  which  may  be  seen 
in  my  forementioned  book.  So,  as  I  observed  before,  feudal  arms  have  been  much 
frequented  and  used  by  our  nobles.  This  Earl  Robert  resigned  the  earldom  of 
Lennox  into  the  King's  hands  ad  remanentiam,  who  confirmed  the  earldom  of  March 
to  him  :  but  he  died  soon  after  without  any  issue,  and  that  earldom  returned  also 
to  the  crown. 

King  James  VI.  conferred  the  earldom  of  Lennox  upon  his  cousin  Esme  Stewart, 
Lord  Aubigny  in  France,  son  and  heir  of  John  Lord  Aubigny,  brother  of  Matthew 
Earl  of  Lennox,  grandfather  of  King  James  VI.  Es.me  was  High-Chancellor  of 
Scotland,  and  created  Duke  of  Lennox,  and  carried  for  arms,  quarterly,  first  and 
fourth  the  feudal  arms  of  Aubigny  in  France,  second  and  third  Stewart,  and,  by 
way  of  surtout,  the  feudal  arms  of  Lennox ;  w^hich  may  be  seen  in  my  forecited 
book,  Plate  VI.  fig.  6.  He  married  Catharine  de  Balsac,  sister  to  the  Sieur  D'Ex 
TRAGNES,  who  borc  to  him  two  sons  and  as  many  daughters;  Ludovick  his  successor, 
and  Esme  Lord  Aubigny  ;  Henrietta  married  to  John  Gordon  first  Marquis  of 
Huntly,  and  Mary  to  John  Earl  of  Marr  ;  who  had  to  their  husbands  many  chil- 
dren, matched  with  noble  families  in  Scotland  ;  which  is  the  reason  why  we  see 
so  frequently  the  arms  of  Sieur  d'Entragnes,  viz.  quarterly,  first  azure,  three  sal- 
tiers  couped  argent,  and,  on  a  chief  or,  as  many  salticrs  couped  of  the  first ;  second 
argent,  a  fret  sable;  thndi  gules,  three  buckles  or;  fourth  as  the  first,  and  in  sur- 
tout argent,  a  serpent  gliding  in  pale  azure  vomiting  out  of  its  mouth  a  child  gules . 
Which  arms,  I  say,  with  these  of  Lennox,  are  frequently  to  be  met  with  on  the 
funeral  escutcheons  of  our  nobles,  as  proofs  or  branches  of  their  maternal  descents 
from  the  houses  of  Huntly  and  Marr. 

The  male  hne  of  Esme  Duke  of  Lennox  failed  in  Charles  Duke  of  Lennox  and 
Richmond  in  England,  who  died  without  issue  in  the  year  1672,  and  the  honours 
returned  to  King  Charles  II.  who  was  served  heir  to  him  ;  so  that  these  noble  feus 
with  their  arms  returned  to  the  crown. 
Vol.  II.  X 


82  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  i^c. 

Of  late  the  honours  and  arms  of  the  earldoms  of  March  were  conferred  upon 
William  Douglas,  second  son  to  William  Duke  of  Queensberry  1703;  upon 
which  account  he  quarters  the  arms  of  that  earldom  with  those  of  his  father's. 

The  arms  used  by  the  Randolphs  Earls  of  Murray,  being  argent,  three  cushions 
within  a  double  tressure,  flowered  and  counter-flowered  with  flower-de-luces  gules, 
became  the  feudal  arms  of  that  earldom,  when  possessed  by  other  families,  with  the 
title  of  Earl  of  Murray. 

Archibald  Douglas,  brother  to  James  Earl  of  Douglas,  who  was,  by  King  James 
n.  created  Earl  of  Murray  1449,  carried,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  the  above 
blazon  of  the  earldom  of  Murray,  second  and  third  the  paternal  coat  of  Douglas : 
He  was  forfeited  for  his  rebellion  1455. 

King  James  IV.  bestowed  that  earldom  on  his  natural  son  James  Stewart,  be- 
got on  Jean  Kennedy,  daughter  to  the  Earl  of  Cassilis,  who  carried,  first  and 
fourth,  the  ensign  of  Scotland,  bruised  with  a  batton  sinister;  second  and  third 
argent,  three  cushions  within  the  double  tressure  ^u/w,  for  the  earldom  of  Murray  : 
He  had  no  sons,  but  two  daughters,  and  the  earldom  being  a  masculine  feu  at  the 
time,  returned  to  the  crown. 

Mary  Queen  of  Scotland  conferred  the  dignity  of  the  earldom  of  Murray  on  her 
natural  brother  James  Stewart,  Prior  of  St  Andrews,  by  letters-patent  of  the  date 
10th  February  1563,  to  him  and  his  heirs  whatsomever.  The  Earl  of  Murray, 
who  was  Regent  of  Scotland,  carried  the  same  quartered  arms  as  his  predecessors 
in  that  earldom.  He  was  killed  in  the  town  of  Linlithgow,  and  left  behind  him 
only  one  daughter,  Isabel,  his  heir,  who  married  James  Stewart  Lord  Doune,  who, 
in  her  right  was  Earl  of  Murray,  of  whom  is  descended  the  present  Earl  of  Mur- 
ray, who  carries,  quarterly,  first  the  arms  of  Scotland,  within  a  bordure,  gobonated 
argent  and  azure,  as  descended  from  the  regent ;  second  or,  a  fesse  cheque,  azure 
and  argent,  for  Stewart  of  Doune  ;  third  argent,  three  cushions  within  a  double 
tressure  counter-flowered  gules,  for  the  earldom  of  Murray ;  and  the  fourth  as 
first. 

The  ancient  Earls  of  Douglas,  when  dignified  with  the  titles  of  noble  feus,  as  that 
of  the  Earldom  of  Galloway,  carried  the  arms  of  that  country,  being  azure,  a  lion 
rampant  argent;  and  when  dignified  with  the  title  of  Duke  of  Touraine  in  France, 
and  with  the  lordship  of  Annandale  in  Scotland,  quartered  the  arms  of  those 
dignities  with  their  paternal  ones  thus,  quarterly;  first  azure,  three  flower-de-luces 
or,  for  the  dukedom  of  Touraine  in  France  ;  second  Douglas ;  third  azure,  three 
stars  argent,  for  Murray  Lord  of  Bothwell  ;  fourth  argent,  a  saltier  and  c\i\&i gules, 
for  the  lordshipof  Annandale;  sometimes  they  left  out  of  their  achievement  the  arms 
of  Galloway,  to  a  branch  of  the  family  dignified  with  the  title  of  Earls  of  Gallo- 
way :  And  other  younger  sons  of  the  family,  who  were  Lords  of  Liddisdale,  quar- 
tered the  arms  of  that  lordship,  being  sahle,  a  lion  rampant  argent,  with  the  pater, 
nal  coat  of  Douglas  with  suitable  differences. 

But  I  cannot  omit  to  give  an  account,  in  short,  how  this  ancient  and  noble 
family  of  Douglas  branched  out  in  many  honourable  families,  who  carried  all 
feudal  arms,  with  which  they  were  dignified,  and  marshalled  them  with  their  pa- 
ternal one. 

William  first  Earl  of  Douglas  had  three  wives,  the  first,  Margaret,  heiress  of 
MaiT,  of  whom  James  Douglas  Earl  of  Marr ;  which  branch  did  not  continue 
long,  as  I  showed  before.  The  second  wife  was  a  daughter  of  Dunbar  Earl  of 
March ;  of  her  came  the  Earls  of  Douglas  and  Lords  of  Galloway,  and  their 
branches  :  And  by  the  third  wife,  Margaret  Stewart,  daughter  and  heir  of  John 
Stewart  Earl  of  Angus,  their  son  was  George,  the  first  of  the  Douglasses  Earls  of 
Angus,  in  right  of  his  mother.  He  married  Mary,  daughter  to  King  Robert  III. 
who  bore  to  him  James  Earl  of  Angus,  who  carried,  and  his  successors,  by  our  old 
books  of  blazon,  and  on  their  seals  of  arms,  quarterly,  first  gules,  a  lion  rampant 
argent,  for  the  earldom  of  Angus ;  second  Douglas  ;  third  or,  a  fesse  cheque  azure 
and  argent,  surmounted  of  a  bend  gules,  charged  with  three  buckles  of  the  first, 
for  Stewart  of  Bonkill;  fourth  or,  a  lion  rampant  ^«/fx,  surmounted  of  a  bendlet 
sable,  for  Abernethy.  This  noble  family  of  the  Douglasses,  Earls  of  Angus,  car- 
ried sometimes  the  same  coats  of  arms  otherwise  marslialled  ;  on  which  various 
marshaUing  of  arms  I  cannot  now  insist,  but  give  you  the  arms  of  that  noble  fa- 
2 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ^r.  83 

mily  as  tliey  have  been  more  constantly  used,  and  now  carried  by  tlie  Duke  of 
Douglas,  viz.  quarterly,  azure,  a  lion  rampant  argent,  for  Galloway  (if  the  field 
were  red,  as  I  think  it  should  be,  it  would  stand  for  the  earldom  of  Angus,  to  which 
they  had  more  right  than  to  Galloway);  second  or,  a  lion  rampant  gules,  sur- 
mounted of  a  bendlet  sable,  for  Abernethy  ;  third  argent,  three  piles  issuing  from 
the  chief  gules,  for  Wishart,  and  not  for  the  Lords  of  Brechin,  as  some  say  ; 
fourth  or,  a  fesse  cheque  argent  and  azure,  surmounted  of  a  bend  gules,  charged 
with  three  buckles  of  the  first,  for  Stewart  of  Bonkill ;  of  which  family  were  the 
Stewarts  Earls  of  Angus ;  and  over  all,  by  way  of  surtout,  the  arms  of  Douglas, 
which  I  have  blazoned  before,  and  caused  them  to  be  also  engraven  in  the  above 
mentioned  book,  the  Ancient  and  Modern  Use  of  Arms. 

The  Town  and  Barony  of  Montrose  carried  arms  relative  to  its  name,  viz,. 
argent,  a  rose  gules ;  and  from  that  barony  David  Lord  Lindsay  Earl  of  Crawford 
was  honoured  with  the  title  of  Duke  ot  Montrose,  by  King  James  IIL;  which  dig- 
nity did  not  continue  in  the  family. 

King  James  IV.  honoured  William  Lord  Graham  with  the  dignity  of  Earl  of 
Montrose  in  the  year  1445,  upon  which  he  and  his  successors.  Earls  of  Montrose, 
carried,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  argent,  on  a  chief  sable,  three  escalops  or,  for 
Graham ;  second  and  third  argent,  three  roses  gules,  for  the  title  of  Montrose,  now 
carried  by  the  present  Duke  of  Montrose. 

The  arms  of  the  lordship  of  B.adenoch,  or,  three  lions'  heads  erased  gules,  a* 
arms  belonging  to  that  feu  ;  which  dignity  was  given  by  King  James  II.  to  the  Lord 
Gordon  for  his  special  services,  and  have  been  marshalled  in  the  achievement  of 
his  bearing,  and  is  now  carried  by  the  Duke  of  Gordon ;  of  whom  I  have  deduced 
the  descent  of  the  family  in  my  former  writings. 

To  come  to  a  close  of  this  section  of  Feudal  Arms,  I  shall  only  mention  these 
of  the  earldoms  of  Arran,  Orkney,  Caithness,  and  lordship  of  Lorn. 

The  arms  properly  belonging  to  these  feus  are  shij)s  or  boats ;  of  which  I  spoke 
before  at  the  beginning  of  this  section. 

The  arms  of  the  Isle  of  Arran,  argent,  a  ship  with  its  sails  furled  up  sable. 
King  James  III.  erected  that  isle  into  an  earldom,  in  favours  of  ThoiMas  Boyd, 
son  of  Robert  Lord  Boyd,  Chancellor  of  Scotland.  Whether  he  quartered  the 
arms  of  Arran  with  his  own,  I  know  not;  for  he  enjoyed  that  earldom  but  a  short 
time. 

King  James  IV.  bestowed  that  earldom  upon  James  Lord  Hamilton,  who  was 
created  Earl  thereof  the  ninth  of  January  1503;  for  which  the  family  since  have 
been  in  use  to  quarter  the  arms  of  the  earldom  of  Arran,  as  feudal  ones,  with  their 
own. 

The  Lordship  of  Lorn's  arms  are,  a  lymphad  (an  old-fashioned  ship  with  one 
mast)  sable,  with  flames  of  fire  issuing  out  of  the  top  of  the  mast,  and  from  the 
fore  and  hinder  parts  of  the  ship ;  as  by  our  old  paintings  and  blazons  called  St 
Anthony's  fire.  This  Lordship  belonged  anciently  to  the  M'Dowalls,  who  carried 
those  arms  for  want  of  male  issue,  which  came  to  an  heiress,  who  was  married  to 
one  of  the  name  of  Stewart  of  the  family  of  Darnly,  whose  posterity  were  pos- 
sessors of  Lorn:  King  James  II.  1445,  created  John  Stewart  Lord  of  Lorn,  who 
carried  for  arms,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  these  of  Lorn,  as  above  ;  second  and 
third  or,  a  fesse  cheque,  azure  and  argent,  with  a  garb  and  chief  azure.  Lord  John 
had  no  lawful  sons,  but  a  natural  one,  Dougal,  predecessor  of  the  Stewarts  of 
Appin,  and  three  daughters  heirs-portioners  ;  the  eldest,  Isabel  Stewart,  was  mar- 
ried to  Colin  Campbell  Earl  of  Argyle  ;  Margaret,  the  second,  to  Sir  John  Camp- 
bell of  Glenorchy  ;  and  the  third  daughter  to  Archibald  Campbell,  the  first  of  ths 
family  of  Ottar. 

William  Stewart  of  Innermeatli,  as  heir-male  to  John  Stewart  Lord  Lorn, 
claimed  the  lordship  of  Lorn,  and  accordingly,  as  heir-male,  was  seised  in  that 
lordship  the  21st  of  March  1469  :  and  in  the  month  of  November,  the  same  year, 
resigned  that  lordship  in  King  James  III.  his  hands,  in  fivours  of  Colin  Earl  of 
Argyle,  for  which  the  Earl  gave  him  other  lands,  and  the  King  dignified  him  with 
a  title  of  Lord  Innermeath. 

Since  which  time,  the  Earls  of  Argyle,  as  Lords  of  Lorn,  have  always  been  in  use 
to  quarter  the  arms  of  that  lordshipi,  as  before  described,  (without  the  flames  of 


84  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  y<?. 

fire  issuing  from  the  mast)  as  feudal  arms  with  their  own,  and  carried  by  his  Grace 
the  present  Duke  of  Argyle,  thus,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth,  gironne  of  eight 
pieces,  or  and  sable;  second  and  ItaxA  argent,  a  ship  withhersails  furled  up,  and  oars 
in  action,  sable. 

Sir  John  Campbell  of  Glenorchy,  who  married  the  other  sister,  Margaret,  and 
whose  issue  was  honoured  with  the  title  and  dignity  of  Earl  of  Breadalbane, 
quartered  the  whole  bearing  of  John  Stewart  Lord  of  Lorn,  with  the  paternal 
arms  of  Campbell,  to  show  their  descent  from  the  Stewarts  of  Lorn,  viz.  quarterly, 
first,  girony  of  eight  pieces,  or  and  sable,  for  Campbell ;  second,  argent,  a  ship 
with  her  sails  furled  up,  and  oars  in  action  sable,  for  Lorn;  third,  or,  a  itss  cheque, 
azure  and  argent :  which  coats  of  arms  are  to  be  seen  cut  in  copperplate  in  the 
above-mentioned  book  of  the  Ancient  and  Modern  Use  of  Armories,  chap.  XV. 

The  armorial  figures  of  the  ancient  Earls  of  Orkney  and  Caithness  were  ships,  up- 
on the  account  before  mentioned.  Torphin  is  said  (as  by  Sir  James  Dairy niple  in  his 
Collections,  page  164.)  to  have  been  the  first  Earl  of  Orkney,  and  created  by  King 
Malcolm  II.  His  grandchild  Renavald,  to  whom  King  David  I.  directs  a  mandate  thus : 
To  Renevald  Earl  ofOrkney,?/  omnibus probis  hominihusCataneiset  Orchadia,  in  fa- 
vours of  the  Monks  of  the  Abbacy  of  Darw^c/j  in  Cataneis;  as  our  above-mentioned  au- 
thor, page  269.  Another  Torphin,  Earl  of  Orkney,  Zetland  and  Caithness,  (Sir  James 
Balfour  in  his  manuscript  says)  married  a  natural  daughter  of  King  William  the  Lion, 
and  she  bore  to  him  John,  his  son  and  successor.  Alexander  Ross,  in  his  Annals,  says 
he  has  seen  this  Earl  John's  seal  of  arms,  which  he  describes  thus,  Navis  circa  li- 
liis  intexto,  i.  e.  a  ship  within  a  double  tressure  ;  which  last  figure,  it  seems,  was 
allowed  upon  the  account  of  his  descent  from  the  royal  family.  Which  arms  are 
often  painted  and  blazoned  in  our  old  herald  books,  and,  as  a  feudal  coat,  quartered  in 
the  armorial  bearings  of  those  who  were  dignified  with  the  titles  of  Earls  of  Ork- 
ney and  Caithness,  thus  blazoned  by  some  ;  and,  as  in  Sir  George  Mackenzie's 
Heraldry,  quarterly,  first,  azure,  a  ship  at  anchor,  her  oars  erected  in  saltier  within 
a  double  tressure,  counter-flowered  or,  for  the  title  of  Orkney ;  second  and  third,  or, 
a  Hon  rampant  gules,  by  the  name  of  Spar  ;  fourth,  azure,  a  ship  under  sail 
or  (by  some  argent),  by  the  title  of  Caithness;;  and  the  Sinclairs  of  Roslin  of  old, 
and  now,  have  been  in  use  to  carry  these  coats,  when  dignified  with  those  noble 
feus,  by  placing  their  cross  ingrailed  sable  over  them  :  But  see  more  of  this  ho- 
nourable family  with  their  arms,  and  those  of  their  cadets,  in  the  First  Volume  of 
the  System  of  Heraldry,  chap.  XV.  page  118.  , 

Sinclair  Lord  Sinclair  of  Ravensheugh  marshals  with  his  paternal  coat  the 
feudal  arms  of  the  Earldom  of  Orkney  and  Caithness,  as  being  the  lineal  heir- 
male  of  William,  Earl  of  Orkney,  upon  the  account  of  his  pretensions  to  these 
earldoms. 


ARMS  OF  PRETENSION. 

Pretension  is  another  cause  of  marshalling  arms  in  one  shield,  by  those  who 
pretend  a  right  to  sovereign  dominions  and  feudal  dignities,  though  possessed  by 
others. 

The  Kings  of  Spain  have  been  in  use  to  show  their  right  of  pretensions  to  the 
kingdoms  of  Portugal  and  Jerusalem,  though  in  the  possession  of  others,  not  only 
in  using  their  titles,  but  their  arms  on  their  seals  and  ensigns,  and  in  marshalling 
the  arms  of  those  kingdoms  with  their  own.  Upon  the  same  account,  the  Dukes 
of  Savoy  have  quartered  the  arms  of  the  kingdom  of  Cyprus  with  their  own,  and 
the  English  have  not  been  wanting  to  do  so  with  these  of  France. 

Christi.\n  UI.  King  of  Denmark,  about  the  year  1546,  quartered  the  arms  of 
Sweden,  viz.  azure,  three  crowns  or,  with  his  own  ;  which  gave  ground  of  jealousy 
to  the  Swedes,  thinking  that  the  Danes,  by  usurping  those  arms,  pretended  right  to 
the  kingdom  of  Sweden;  as  Beckmanus  says,  "  Tantum  insigniorum  istorum  usur- 
"  patione,  quoque  jus  aliquod  in  regnum  Svvedia?,  Dani  pra;texerunt ;"  so  that  a 
bloody  wr  r  broke  out  between  these  nations.  King  James  IV.  of  Scotland  inter- 
posed for  a  peace  by  his  two  ambassadors.  Sir  Robert  Anstruther  of  that  Ilk,  and 
Sir  James  Spence  of  Womiiston,  who  happily  accommodated  the  contest  between 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS.  isc.  85 

these  two  kingdoms,  by  four  articles  relating  to  the  bearing  of  these  arms^ 
account  of  which  I  have  given  before  in  the  i6th  chap,  ia  the  Essay  of  Armo- 
ries. 

Carrving  arms  upon  the  account  of  pretended  right  to-  kingdoms,  dignified 
feus,  and  other  things,  lias  been  the  occasion  of  much  bloodshed,  enmity,  and 
discord  almost  everywhere  ;  so  that,  Hoppingivis  ilc  y:i>'e  Insigniuiii,  cap.  87. 
speaking  against  assuming  or  usurping  the  arms  of  others,  says,  "  Q^iis  autem  tain 
"  alienus  a  civili  conversatione  inventus  unquam,  qui  non  ob  indifferentem  in- 
"  signium  delationem,  dissidia,  rixas,  odia,  injurias,  certamina  orta  viderit,  le- 
"  geritve." 

The  Kings  of  Denmark,  amongst  other  reasons  of  pretending  right  to  the  supe- 
riority of  the  city  of  Hamburgh,  has  one,  that  the  city  had,  on  its  public  places, 
anciently  the  arms  of  Holsteint,  and  was  a  part  of  their  dominions^  viz..  ^niles,  a 
nettle  stalk  of  three  leaves  expanded,  and,  on  its  middle,  an  escutcheon  argi'iit ;  as 
Beckmanus  tells  us,  "  Inter  rationes  prsetensionis  regum  Danire  in  civitatem  Ham- 
"  bergensem,  una  fuit,  quod  folium  urticas,  principmn  Holsatias  insignia,  a  tempore 
"  Christiani  tertii  passim  urbis  insignibus,  in  Curiae  portis,  sigillo  publico,  ac  moneta, 
"  scripserunt;"  which  being  the  arms  of  the  princes  of  Holstein,  and  the  kings  of 
Denmark  succeeding  to  them,  have  had  a  pretension  to  that  city  by  law;  for  arms 
being  fixed  upon  moveables  or  immoveables,  presume  a  right  of  property  or 
superiority  to  these  things :  But  how  far  that  pretension  will  reach,  I  leave, to  law- 
yers. 

The  Swedes  and  Polanders  engaged  in  a  war  upon  the  account  of  carrying  the 
arms  of  Sweden,  which  Sigismund  III.  of  Sweden  used  after  he  was  deposed;  and, 
when  elected  King  of  Poland,  marshalled  with  the  arms  of  Poland,  to  show,  as  it  were, 
his  right  and  civil  possession  of  Sweden,  and  natural  one  of  Poland  :  which  was  so 
hotly  resented  by  the  Swedes,  that  he  was  forced  to  come  to  an  accommodation  at 
the  treaty  of  Oliva,  in  the  year  1662,  where  he  renounced  his  right  to  Sweden,  its 
titles  and  arms,  and  that  he  should  not  use  them  in  any  affairs  and  letters  to  that 
kingdom  ;  but,  as  being  once  their  king,  he  had  liberty  to  use  the  title  and  arms 
of  Sweden  in  his  writs  to  other  foreign  states,  princes,  and  private  persons  ;  and 
that,  in  all  time  coming  after  his  death,  the  kings  of  Poland  should  forbear  the 
titles  and  arms  of  Sweden. 

As  the  use  of  aniu  of  pretension  has  been  troublesome ;  so  the  omission  of  using 
such  has  been  no  less  prejudical  to  some.  It  was  objected  to  Richard  Duke  of 
York,  when  he  claimed  the  crown  of  England,  as  heir  to  Lionel  Duke  of  Clarence, 
that  he  did  not  carry  Clarence  his  arms,  as  heir  to  the  crown.  He  answered,  That 
he  might  have  done  it,  but  he  forbore  them,  as  he  did  also  the  claim  to  the  crov\-n; 
which  he  also  missed  at  the  time  :  But  he  and  his  posterity  were  more  careful  to 
use  them  afterwards. 

The  Dukes  of  Anjou,  who  were  Titular  Kings  of  Jerusalem,  Sicily,  Arragon, 
and  Naples,  quartered  the  arms  of  those  dominions  with  their  proper  ones,  upon 
the  account  of  pretension ;  and  the  Princes  of  Orange  have  been  in  use  to  do  the 
same  with  the  arms  of  Geneva. 

Many  of  our  noble  families  in  Scotland  have  been  in  practice  anciently  and  now 
to  quarter  the  ensigns  of  dignified  feus  with  their  own,  upon  account  of  right  of 
pretension.  Malise  Graham,  though  he  was  deprived  by  King  James  I.  of  the 
earldom  of  Strathern,  and,  in  place  of  it,  got  the  earldom  of  Manteith  ;  yet  he 
and  his  successors.  Earls  of  Monteith,  carried  the  armorial  figures  of  the  earldom 
of  Strathern,  viz.  or,  a  fesse  cheque,  azure  and  argent,  and,  in  chief,  a  clieveron 
gules,  which  were  quartered  with  their  paternal  arms  argent,  on  a  chief  gules, 
three  escalops  or,  as  always  pretending  right  to  that  earldom. 

The  Lords  Erskine  of  the  same  name,  upon  their  right  of  pretension  to  the 
earldom  of  Marr,  quartered  these  of  that  earldom  with  their  paternal  arms,  long 
before  they  attained  to  the  possession  and  dignity  of  that  earldom. 

The  Lords  of  Seaton  have  been  in  a  constant  use  to  quarter  the  feudal  arms  of 
the  earldom  of  Buchan,  viz.  a-zure,  three  garbs  or,  upon  the  account  of  pretension 
to  that  earldom,  since  the  reign  of  King  James  II.  being  lineal  heirs  by  descent  to 
John  Stewart  Earl  of  Buchan,  High  Constable  of  France,  second  son  of  Robert 
Duke  of  Albany,  Governor  of  Scotland.  George  Lord  Seaton  married  Lady  Jean 
Stewart,  only  daughter  and  heir  of  the  said  John  Earl  of  Buchan,  from  whom  were 

Vol.  JI.  Y 


86  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  He. 

descended,  in  a  right  line,  all  the  Lords  of  Seaton  and  Earls  of  Winton,  who  have 
been  in  use  to  quarter  the  arms  of  Buchan  to  show  their  right ;  but  more  of  this 
family  in  the  first  volume,  page  231. 

Having  treated  of  the  various  occasions  and  causes  of  marshalling  many  coats  of 
arms  in  one  shield,  I  proceed  to  these  of  dominions. 


ARMS  OF  DOMINION. 

As  to  arms  of  dominion,  I  have  already  given  a  full  account  in  my  Essay  on  the 
Ancient  and  Modern  Use  of  Armories,  chap.  XIV.  But  that  book  being  now  al- 
most out  of  print,  for  the  benefit  of  such  of  my  readers  as  have  not  seen  it,  I  think 
myself  obliged  to  give  a  repetition  of  several  things  there  advanced,  and  necessa- 
rily to  be  known  in  this  System  of  Heraldry  ;  and  particularly  the  variations  of 
the  armorial  ensigns  of  Scotland  and  England,  to  which  I  shall  add  these  ensigns 
after  the  union  of  the  two  kingdoms,  as  they  were  borne  by  our  late  sovereign 
Qiieen  Anne  ;  and  lastly,  as  they  are  now  borne  by  his  present  Majesty. 

Arms  of  dominion  are  these  which  belong  to  sovereign  princes  and  common- 
wealths by  right  of  sovereignty;  and  these  may  be  said,  in  a  strict  sense,  not  to  be 
properly  arms,  as  I  have  before  defined  them,  but  rather  ensigns  and  badges  of 
public  authority,  and  of  a  longer  antiquity ;  for  of  old,  the  Persian,  Grecian,  and 
Roman  monarchies  had  fixed  ensigns  of  their  sovereignties,  as  other  monarchs 
have  since  used. 

In  carrying  such  ensigns,  there  are  three  specialties  to  be  observed,  rising  from 
the  different  way  of  obtaining  sovereignty,  by  succession  of  blood,  election,  and  con- 
quest ;  of  which  in  order. 

And  first.  The  person  who  ascends  the  throne  by  legal  succession,  must  be  either 
a  sovereign,  or  a  subject  descended  of  a  private  family ;  if  the  first,  he  marshals 
his  own  sovereign  ensigns  with  the  arms  of  the  dominion  he  succeeds  to :  and  it  is 
the  opinion  of  some,  in  marshalling  of  them,  to  give  the  first  quarter  to  the  arms 
of  the  ancientest  sovereignty,  as  the  kings  of  England  carry  in  the  first  quarter 
the  arms  of  France  before  those  of  England. 

But  the  first  practice  I  meet  with  in  marshalling  arms  of  dominion,  is  in  the 
achievement  of  the  kings  of  Spain,  where  the  latest  kingdom  is  preferred  to  the 
ancientest. 

About  the  year  loi 7,  Ferdinand,  eldest  son  of  Sanctius,  to-named  the  Great, 
King  of  Navarre,  and  Elivira,  daughter  to  the  sixth  and  last  Earl  of  Castile,  who 
carried,  in  a  red  field,  a  castle  of  gold,  because  in  a  battle  against  Miramolin, 
King  of  the  Moors,  he  recovered  that  country  ;  as  Hoppingius  tells  us,  "  Castilia 
"  sive  Castelte  insignia  castrum  aureum,  rubro  in  campo,  eo  quod  magno  illo  pra- 
"  lio  contra  Miramolinum  Maurorum  regem  victor  extitisset  perhibitur." 

This  Ferdinand  was  the  first  that  was  honoured  v.'ith  the  title  of  King  of  Cas- 
tile, and  married  Sanctia  the  daughter  of  Alphonsus,  King  of  Leon,  and  sister  to 
Beremund,  who  died  without  issue.  Ferdinand,  by  this  marriage,  became  king  of 
Castile  and  Leon,  and  marshalled  the  arms  of  both  these  kingdoms  in  one  shield, 
viz.  first  and  fourth,  Castile;  second  and  third,  Leon,  argent,  a  lion  rampant  .f?^/«; 
thus  blazoned  as  by  the  above  author,  "  Reges  Castellae  et  Legionis  quadriparti- 
"  turn  in  insignibus  offerunt  scutum,  in  parte  superiori  dextra  et  in  inferiori  sinis- 
"  tra  castellum  aureum  in  campo  rubeo;  in  parte  superiori  sinistra  et  inferiori  dex- 
"  tra  leonem  fulvum  in  campo  albo  exhibens." 

The  kingdom  of  Leon  was  a  more  ancient  kingdom  than  Castile  for  many  ages; 
for,  when  Pelagius  took  that  country  and  town  from  the  Moors  about  the  722, 
it  was  called  a  kingdom,  and  he  took  for  his  arms  a  lion,  because  it  is  said  to  be 
the  king  of  beasts ;  as  our  author,  "  Pelagius  Legionis  Rex  primus  circa  annum 
"  722,  eripiens  Lcgionem  civitatem  a  Mauris  leonem  pro  insigniis  assumpsit,  quia  leo 
"  est  et  interpretatur  rex  omnium  bestiarum." 

Many  are  of  opinion,  that  the  arms  of  Leon,  being  those  of  the  ancientest  king- 
dom, should  be  placed  in  the  first  and  fourth  quarters  ;  and  so  to  have  the  prece- 
dency of  the  arms  of  Castile.  Ludovicus  Mohna,  a  famous  lawyer,  defends  the 
method  of  marshaUing  as  above  blazoned  :    imo.  That  the  greatest  kingdom  should- 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  5i.%  87- 

be  preferred-  to  the  ancientest :  2do,  Ferdinand  was  king  of  Castile  by  right  of  his 
father,  and  got  Leon  by  right  of  his  wife  nomine  dotis ;  and  that  in  his  title  he  was 
named  first  King  of  Castile,,  and  then  by  his  wife,  Leon,,  preferring  the  title  of  the 
man  to  the  woman,  and  the  mother's  title  ought  to  follow  the  father's  •.  His  words 
are,  "  Turn  quod  virilis  stirpis  iniperium  preferri  debuit  foemineo,  maternaque  in- 
"  signia  paternis  insignibus  cedere  debuerunt." 

Kmg  James  VI.  of  Scotland  succeeded  by  his  maternal  descent  to  the  king- 
dom of  England,  and  these  two  kingdoms  being  united  in  his  person,  marshalled 
their  arms  quarterly,  giving  the  precedency  to  the  arms  of  Scotland  as  the  ancient- 
est sovereignty,  and  as  his  paternal  bearing  on  his  ensigns  and  coins. 

If  he  who  ascends  the  throne  by  succession  be  of  the  quality  of  a  subject,  de- 
scended'of  a  private  family,  he  then  lays  aside  his  own  paternal  arms,  and  uses  on- 
ly these  of  the  dominion  he  succeeds  to. 

As  Robert  the  Bruce,  when  he,  as  first  heir-male  of  David  Earl  of  Huntingdon, 
brother  to  King  William,  succeeded  to  the  crown  of  Scotland,  disused  his  own  pa- 
ternal bearing,  or,  a  saltier  and  chief  gules,  and  carried  only  the  sovereign  ensigns 
of  the  kingdom  or,  a  lion  rampant  gules,  armed  and  langued  azure,  within  a  dou- 
ble tressure,  flowered  and  counter-tlowered  of  the  second  ;  which  were  so  carried 
by  his  son  King  David  II.  Whose  grandson,  Robert  Stewart,  by  his  daughter, 
Marjory  Bruce,  when  he  succeeded  as  heir  to  the  crown,  laid  aside  also  his  pater- 
nal arms,  the  fesse  cheque,  and  carried  only  those  of  the  kingdom,  being  the  second 
Robert  of  that  name,  King  of  Scotland,  and  first  of  the  surname  of  Stewart;  and 
from  him  are  lineally  descended  the  Kings  of  Britain. 

The  second  way  in  attaining  to  sovereignty,  which  I  have  mentioned,  is  by  elec- 
tion :  these  who  ascend  the  throne  that  way,  retain  their  own  proper  arms,  and 
conmonly  place  them  in  an  inescutcheon  by  way  of  surtout,  over  those  of  the 
dominions  to  which  they  are  elected ;  as  the  elective  Emperors  cf  Germany,  and 
as  the  Kings  of  Poland  have  been  in  use  to  do,  to  show  out  of  what  family  they 
were  chosen ;  and  William  Prince  of  Orange  placed  his  arms  over  these  of  Eng- 
land and  Scotland,  as  an  elective  king,  by  way  of  surtout. 

The  third  way  of  ascending  tlie  throne  is  by  conquest.  It  has  been  tlie  ordinary 
custom  for  conquerors  to  beat  down  and  bury  in  oblivion  the  ensigns  of  the  con- 
quered dominions,  and,  in  place  of  them,  to  set  up  their  own  ensigns  to  sliow  their 
right  and  power.  The  Count  of  Barjolou,  when  he  conquered  the  kingdom  of 
Arragon,  pulled  down  his  arms,  argent,  a  cross  gules,  cantoned  with  four  Moors'  heads, 
proper,  and  erected  his  own  or,  four  pallets  gules.  And  one  of  his  successors, 
James  King  of  Arragon,  in  the  year  1229,  when  he  conquered  the  islands  of 
Majorca  and  Minorca,  erected  his  standard  with  the  pallets ;  and  having  given 
those  islands  with  the  title  of  King  to  his  younger  son,  he  placed  over  the  pallet  a 
bendlet,  the  brisure  of  a  younger  son  :  and  when  another  James  King  of  Arragon 
conquered  Sardinia,  he  gave  for  arms  to  that  dominion  the  old  conquered  ensigns 
of  Arragon,  with  these  words  for  device,  Trophaea  Regni  Arragonum,  to  show  that,, 
when  conqueror,  he  might  give  what  ensigns  he  pleased. 

The  family  of  Swabia,  being  in  possession  of  the  kingdom  of  Sicily,  erected, 
their  arms,  viz.  argent  an  eagle  displayed  sable,  which  continued  the  ensign  of  Si- 
cily, rill  Charles  of  Anjou,  a  brother  of  France,  conquered  that  kingdom  with 
that  of  Naples,  and  beat  down  the  foresaid  arms  of  Swabia,  and  set  up  his  own- 
azure,  seme  of  flower-de-luces  or,  with  a  label  of  five  points  gules,  for  the  sove- 
reign ensign  of  those  kingdoms ;  which  arms  continue  there  yet:  But  the  Arra- 
gons  having  cut  off  the  French  in  Sicily,  pulled  down  the  arms  of  Anjou,  and 
again  erected  their  own,  as  before  blazoned,  which  afterwards  they  quartered  per 
saltier  with  these  of  Arragon  ;  of  which  afterwards  :  And  for  which  practice  of 
conquerors,  see  Favine's  Theatre  of  Honour,  and  "Jeu  d'  Armories  des  .So-jei-aigns. 

But  to  return  from  foreign  territories  and  come  nearer  home,  there  is  as  large  a 
field  in  Soutli  Britain  for  instances  of  depredations,  extirpations,  and  revolutions, 
which  have  attended  and  subjected  the  inhabitants  to  the  different  armorial  bear- 
ings of  their  conquerors  and  pretenders,  as  any  ;  who,  as  witness  the  historians  of 
that  countrv',  John  Speed,  Sir  Winston  CliurchUl  in  his  Divi  Britannici,  and  many 
others,  in  whose  histories,  and  particularly  in  those  two  mentioned,  are  to  be  found 
many  different  armorial  ensigns  in  taille  douce  plate,  according  to  the  various  sub- 


SS  Oh  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  i^c: 

jections  the  English  have  been  under.  I  shall  only  mention  three,  and  insist 
upon  the  fovuth,  in  a  detail  of  the  succession  of  the  Kings  of  England,  and  their 
arms  from  William  the  Conqueror,  in  their  variations  and  augmentations,  to  the 
time  of  King  James  L  of  Great  Britain,  according  to  their  best  writers,  and  fo- 
reigners. 

1  shall  pass  the  fabulous  story  of  Brutus,  who  is  said  by  some  to  have  possessed 
this  island,  from  him  called  Britain;  and  that  he  divided  it  among  his  three  sons  a 
thousand  years  before  the  Incarnation  of  Christ:  As  also  their  ensigns,  which  are 
as  uncertain  as  the  story,  and  were  beat  down  by  the  Romans  when  they  conquer- 
ed the  south  part  of  Britain,  since  called  England,  having  set  up  their  own  im- 
perial eagle  in  their  place:  But  times  of  lesser  antiquity  will  give  us  some  more 
certainty  of  imperial  ensigns. 

First,  then,  when  the  South  Britons  were  overcome  by  the  Saxons,  as  some 
reckon,  about  the  year  475  of  the  Incarnation  of  our  Saviour,  who  possessed  the 
country  now  called  England,  the  Saxons  set  up  their  ensigns,  which  were,  by  the 
most  learned  writers,  said  to  be  azure,  a  cross  forme  or;  by  some  a  cross  fleury, 
which  is  the  same;  as  Speed,  Churchill,  Gerard  Leigh,  Guillim,  York,  Morgan, 
and  other  English  heralds. 

Secondly,  the  Danes  began  to  molest  the  English  Saxons  about  the  year  of  God 
787,  and  to  take  possession  of  England.  At  last  Sueno  the  Dane  conquered 
England,  so  that  four  Danish  kings  successively  did  reign:  They  beat  down  the 
Saxon  ensign,  and  set  up  their  own,  being  or,  seme  of  hearts,  three  leopards  ^«/«; 
as  Spencer's  Opus  Heraldicum,  and  Chamberland  in  his  Present  State  of  England, 
and  the  learned  German  and  famous  antiquary.  Jacobus  Imhoff,  in  his  Treatise 
entitled  Blazonia  Regum  Pariumque  Magnce  Britannia,  says,  "  Ex  Danis  autem 
"  ortos  reges,  iisdem  insignibusillo  jam  ssculo,  usos  esse,  quibus  Dania°  reges  hodie 
"  uti  solent,  viz.  leopardis  tribus  in  area  aurea,  rubris  cordibus  sparsis,  dictus 
"  (Spencerus)  Notitiae  Anglise  auctor,  cum  aliis  affirmari  solent." 

Thirdly,  the  Danish  kings  being  dethroned,  the  English  Saxon  kings  were  again 
restored  with  their  imperial  ensign  as  before,  azure,  a  cross  fornne  or,  with  the  ad- 
dition of  four  martlets  or;  as  the  above-cited  Chamberland:  And  were  carried  by 
King  Edward  the  Confessor,  with  a  martlet  in  base,  which  made  five. 

After  his  death,  Harold,  the  'son  of  the  Earl  of  Kent,  usurped  the  crown : 
His  arms  were,  as  by  the  English  books,  argent,  a  bar  betwixt  three  leopards' 
heads  sable. 

William  of  Normandy  invades  England,  defeats  and  kills  Harold,  and  takes 
possession  of  the  kingdom.  Edgar  Atheling,  the  lineal  heir-male  and  representer 
of  the  Saxon  English  kings,  was  put  aside  from  his  just  right:  For,  being  the  son 
of  Edward,  the  son  of  King  Edmund  Ironside,  elder  brother  to  King  Edward  the 
Confessor,  he  was  the  undoubted  heir  of  the  crown  of  England,  where,  not  being 
in  safety  to  stay,  he  came  to  Scotland  with  his  two  sisters.  Christian  and  Mar- 
garet. The  last  was  married  to  Malcolm  Canmore;  her  arms  being  the  same 
with  Edward  the  Confessor's,  are  to  be  seen  in  the  monastery  of  Dunfermline, 
of  which  she  was  a  founder.  Her  brother  and  sister  dying  without  issue,  she 
was  the  only  heiress  of  the  Saxon  race,  and  from  her  are  descended  the  Kings  of 
Britain. 

Let  these  then  be  a  suiBcient  number  of  instances  of  the  great  revolutions  and 
conquests  of  England,  (besides  lesser  ones)  and  of  their  ensigns. 

The  fourth  period  in  which  the  English  were  obliged  to  receive  the  arms  of  a 
conqueror,  was  about  the  year  of  God  1066,  when  William,  the  seventh  Duke  of 
Normandy,  being  a  victorious  conqueror  over  England,  his  arms  were  set  up,  being 
gules,  two  leopards  or,  derived  to  him  from  his  progenitors  ;  and,  upon  the  conquest, 
were  received  as  the  banner  and  ensign  of  England,  according  to  all  historians  and 
heralds,  domestic  and  foreign. 

William  II.  succeeded  his  father  in  the  kingdom  of  England,  and  had  the  same 
ensign  and  standard ;  and  he  again  was  succeeded  by  his  younger  brother  Henry  I. 
in  the  kingdom  of  England,  and  dukedom  of  Normandy,  who  carried  the  same 
ensign.  He  married  Maude,  eldest  daughter  of  Malcolm  Canmore  King  of  Scotland, 
and  his  queen,  Margaret,  sister  and  heir  of  Edgar  Atheling,  the  representative  of 
the  English  Saxon  monarchs..    By  this  marriage  the  Saxon  English  blood  was  united 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  \^c.  89 

with  the  Nornian;  and,  in  testimony  of  it.  King  Henry,  on  his  seal,  I  mean  his 
Sijil/um  Imaji/iis,  is  represented  in  a  throne,  holding  in  his  right  hand  a  mond, 
or  globe,  with  a  bird  upon  it,  being  the  martlet  before  mentioned  in  the  arms  of 
of  tlie  Saxon  kings.  And  Sandford  takes  notice  of  it  accordingly,  saying,  "  It 
"  was  a  token  or  emblem  of  the  restoration  in  some  sort  of  Edward  the  Confessoi's 
"  kin  and  laws." 

This  king  survived  his  male  issue,  having  only  one  daughter,  Maude,  named  after 
her  motlier,  and  was  married  first  to  Henry  Emperor  of  Germany,  for  which  she  is 
called  Maude  the  Empress,  though  she  had  no  issue  to  him.  And,  secondly,  she 
took  for  husband  Geoffrey  Plantagenet  Earl  of  Anjou,  and  bore  to  him  a  son,  Henry. 
The  king,  being  sohcitous  to  secure  the  succession  of  the  crown  to  his  daughter 
and  grandson,  made  all  the  estates  of  England  swear  fealty  to  them,  as  those  who 
were  to  reign  after  him. 

Nevertheless  Stephen  Earl  of  Boulogne,  son  of  the  Earl  of  Blois,  by  Adela, 
William  the  Conqueror's  daughter,  got  the  crown  ;  and  it  is  not  likely  that  the 
English  would  have  received  him  contrary  to  their  oaths,  unless  the  law  had  been 
for  him ;  for  Henry  the  son  of  Maude,  having  the  title  by  a  woman,  and  Stephen 
the  same,  affirmed  himself  to  be  the  tirst  in  succession,  (William  the  Conqueror's 
male  issue  being  extinct)  because  he  was  again  the  tirst  male,  though  descended 
from  a  woman,  the  conqueror's  daughter;  and  though  Maude  had  been  alive,  he 
ought  to  have  been  preferred  to  her,  much  more  to  her  son  Henry ;  and,  as  being 
the  first  male,  he  ought  to  be  preferred,  being  conform  to  the  constitutions  of  se- 
veral nations  besides  that  of  England.  By  which  we  may  discover  the  unjust  sen- 
tence of  Edward  I.  in  preferring  Baliol  to  the  Bruce,  \?.io  had  the  same,  if  not  a 
better  right  than  Stephen,  who  was  looked  upon  by  the  English  as  the  lawful  heir 
and  King  of  England.  He  carried  the  above  royal  ensign,  with  the  two  leopards, 
and,  for  a  device,  the  sagittary,  because  he  ascended  the  throne  at  that  time  when 
the  sun  entred  that  celestial  sign ;  and  had  for  his  queen,  Matilda,  daughter  of 
Eustace  Earl  of  Boulogne,  by  his  countess,  Mary,  second  daughter  of  Malcolm  Can- 
more,  and  his  queen,  Margaret,  with  the  same  design  to  unite  the  Saxon  and  Nor- 
man blood  together  in  his  issue,  which  failed  before  himself;  so  that  room  was 
made  for  Henry,  son  of  Maude  the  empress. 

Henry  II.  grandchild  <of  Henry  I.  son  of  Geoffrey  Plantagenet  Earl  of  Anjou,  in 
the  reign  of  King  Stephen,  whose  titles  were  Hgnricus,  Dux  Normannorum  rt  Aqui- 
tanorum;  and  when  he  succeeded  to  Stephen  King  of  England,  anno  1135,  Hen- 
ricus  Dei  Gratia  Rex  Anglorum,  Dux  Normannorum  et  Aquitanorum,  et  Comes  Andi- 
gavorum.  His  banner  was  as  his  predecessors,  with  the  arms  of  Normandy,  for  the 
ensign  of  England,  as  almost  all  the  English  writers  do  affirm,  except  two  that  1 
have  met  with  ;  of  whom  afterwards. 

He  married  Eleanor  of  Aquitaine  and  Guienne,  the  eldest  daughter  and  heir  of 
WiUiam  the  fifth  of  that  name,  ninth  Duke  of  Aquitaine,  by  Eleanor  of  Chatel- 
herault,  his  wife;  and,  upon  account  of  that  marriage,  he  added  his  queen's  arms 
to  his  own,  by  way  of  composition,  as  the  English  tell  us. 

Sir  John  Feme,  one  of  the  learnedest  heralds  in  his  time,  in  the  reign  of  Queen 
Elizabeth,  in  his  book  entitled  the  Glory  of  Generosity,  page  218.  says,  "  The 
"  escutcheon  of  Normandy  was  advanced  as  the  ensign  of  our  English  kings,  by 
"  William  the  Conqueror,  William  Rufus,  Henry  I.  and  Henry  II.  the  last  having 
"  married  Eleanor  the  heiress  of  Aquitaine,  whose  arms  were  gules,  a  leopard  or, 
"  which  being  of  the  same  field,  metal,  and  form,  with  his  own."  The  same 
author  adds,  "  These  two  coats,  viz.  Aquitaine  and  Normandy,  were  joined  in 
"  one,  and  by  them  the  addition  of  the  inheritance  of  Eleanor,  heiress  of  Aqui- 
"  taine,  to  our  English  crown ;  and  therefore  are  borne  as  a  quadrate  royal  by  our 
"  sovereign  lady  Qiieen  Elizabeth."  The  same  says  Guillim,  Chamberlayne,  and 
others.  And  those  arms,  so  composed,  were  placed  on  his  funeral  monument, 
where  he  lies  interred  in  the  abbacy  of  Foateward  in  Anjou,  adorned  with  other 
shields  of  arms ;  as  those  of  the  Saxon  race ;  upon  the  account  that  in  him  the 
Saxon  blood  was  restored  by  his  grandfather's  marriage,  as  before.  The  structure 
of  which  monument  is  given  to  us  in  Sandford's  Genealogical  History,  page  64. 
This  king  had  five  sons :  Wilham  and  Henry,  who  died  betorc  himself;  Richard, 
who  succeeded  him;  the  fourth  son,  Geoffrey,  Duke  of  Bretagne,  and  Earl  of  Rich- 

Voi..  U.  Z 


go  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  cir. 

mond,  whose  son  was  cut  off  by  his  uncle;  John,  the  fifth  son,  who  became  King 
of  England. 

Richard,  third  son  of  Henry  IL  was  Earl  of  Poictiers  during  his  father's  reign, 
and,  after  his  death,  was  King  of  England,  by  the  name  of  Richard  L  He  was  in 
the  wars  in  the  Holy' Land;  an  excellent  prince.  In  his  return  home  he  was 
taken  prisoner  by  Leopold  Duke  of  Austria,  who  unworthily  sold  him  to  the  em- 
peror for  6000  merks;  and  he  again  as  unworthily  took  100,000  pounds.  This 
king,  as  his  father,  carried  for  his  royal  ensign,  gules,  three  leopards  or,  and  the 
same  on  his  seal  of  arms,  which  Sandford  gives.  On  the  one  side  he  is  enthronized 
with  a  crown  on  his  head,  heightened  with  flowers,  holding  in  his  right  hand  a 
sword  erected,  and  in  his  left  a  mond  topped  with  a  cross  patee,  with  this  circumscrip- 
tion round  his  effigies,  Ricardus  Dei  Gratia  Rex  Anglorum:  On  the  other  side  he  is 
represented  in  his  coat  of  mail  on  horseback,  and  his  helmet  adorned  whh  planta 
genistce,  i.  e.  a  stalk  of  broom,  relative  to  his  surname,  being  the  second  king  of  the 
Plantagenet;  on  his  left  arm  was  a  shield  charged  with  three  leopards,  with  this 
circumscription  round,  Ricardus  Dux  Normannormn  et  Aquitanorum,  et  Comes  Andi- 
gavorum.  He  is  said  to  be  the  first  king  of  England  that  took  the  motto  Dieu  et 
mon  droit,  upon  a  great  victory  he  obtained  over  the  French  at  the  battle  of 
Guysors,  by  his  saying,  TSSot  we,  but  God  and  our  right  has  got  the  victory.  These 
I  think  are  sufficient  documents  of  the  origin  of  the  arms  of  England. 

John,  fifth  son  of  Henry  II.  and  his  queen,  Eleanor,  in  his  brother  King  Richard's 
life,  on  his  seal  of  arms,  is  represented  on  horseback,  with  a  sword  in  his  right 
hand,  and  on  his  left  arm  a  shield,  upon  which  were  two  lions  passant  gardant, 
evidently  apparent,  says  Sandford,  which  he  has  seen  appended  to  grants,  where- 
in he  is  stiled  Comes  Moritanite:  Which  two  lions  passant  gardant  were  certainly 
those  of  Normandy  ;  but  could  not  then  add  th?  third  of  Aquitaine,  as  not 
representing  his  mother,  till  after  the  death  of  his  brother  King  Richard,  who 
died  without  issue;  then  he  carried  on  his  seal  of  arms,  when  King  of  England,  as 
Duke  of  Normandy  and  Aquitaine,  an  escutcheon  charged  with  three  lions  passant 
gardant. 

Henry  III.  upon  the  death  of  his  father  King  John,  was  crowned  King  of  England 
the  28th  of  October  1216.  His  seal  of  arms  was  as  his  predecessors,  himself  en- 
thronized upon  one  side,  and  on  the  other  side  represented  on  horseback ;  on  his 
left  arm  a  shield  charged  with  three  lions  passant  gardant:  But  in  this  he  was 
singular,  in  having  a  crown  placed  upon  his  helmet  on  his  head,  being  the  first  of 
the  race  of  the  kings  of  England  that  were  so  represented  with  a  crown  on  horse- 
back. The  legend  round  his  seal  was  Henricus  Dei  Gratia  Rex  Atiglia,  Dominus 
HiberniiB  et  Aquitanice. 

Edward,  the  eldest  son  of  King  Henry  III.  during  his  father's  reign,  carried  the 
arms  of  England,  with  a  label  of  three  points,  and  on  shields  where  the  field  was 
large,  a  label  of  five  points,  for  his  difference  ;  as  by  his  seal  of  arms  appended  to 
writs,  in  which  he  is  stiled  Edwardus  Illustris  Regis  Anglia  primogenitus.  He  was 
the  first  son  of  the  royal  family  of  England  that  carried  such  a  difference  as  a 
label  of  three  points,  and  of  five  points.  The  different  number  of  points  lets  us 
see  the  mistake  of  some  heralds,  who  write,  that  a  label  of  three  points  is  the  pro- 
per difference  for  an  eldest  son  and  heir,  when  the  father  is  alive ;  one  point  re- 
presenting the  father,  the  other  the  mother  to  be  alive,  and  the  third  himself;  and 
when  the  grandfather  and  grandmother  are  alive,  the  label  then  should  have  five 
points.  But  here  Prince  Edward  had  neither  grandfather  nor  grandmother  alive, 
and  yet  he  carried  a  label  of  five  points  on  his  seal  of  arms;  which  that  learned 
gentleman  Sandford  gives,  as  appended  to  evidents  of  the  date  1267,  where,  on  the 
one  side,  he  is  represented  in  his  coat  of  mail  and  surcoat  of  arms,  with  a  sword  in 
his  right  hand,  and  a  shield  on  his  left,  charged  with  the  three  Lions  of  England, 
and  differenced  by  a  label  of  three  points;  and  upon  the  reverse,  or  other  side  of 
the  seal,  a  large  triangular  shield,  charged  with  the  same  three  Lions  of  England, 
and  with  a  label  of  five  points.  And  this  same  practice,  of  having  sometimt^  a 
label  of  three  points,  and  sometimes  of  five,  continued  with  his  son  and  grandson, 
Edward  II.  and  111.  when  their  fathers  were  alive,  and  not  their  grandfathers  and 
grandmothers. 

2 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  'ijc.  91 

Edward  was  in  the  wars  of  Palestine  wlien  his  father  Henry  died  i;7;,  and  re- 
turned 1274,  and  was  crowned  king  at  Westminster  the  I9tli  of  August,  with  his 
queen,  Eleanor,  sister  to  the  then  King  of  Spain.  He,  being  king,  carried  arms 
as  his  father,  with  a  new  practice  of  having  tiie  arms  of  England  embroidered  on 
the  caparisons  of  his  horse,  and  was  the  first  tiiat  brought  in  that  practice  into 
England.  He  married,  for  his  second  wife,  Margaret,  sister  to  Philip  IV.  surnamed 
the  Fair,  King  of  France.  The  arms  of  both  his  queens  1  have  given  in  the  5tli 
chapter  of  my  Essay.  His  eldest  son,  Edward,  by  his  first  queen,  was  surnamed 
Caeknarvon,  from  the  place  of  his  birth  in  Wales.  He,  in  his  father's  lifetime, 
used,  for  ditlerence,  upon  his  escutcheon  of  arms,  on  the  equestrian  side  of  his  seal, 
a  label  of  three  points;  and,  upon  the  reverse,  where  there  was  a  large  escutcheon, 
a  label  of  five  points,  and  w  as  stiled  Edwurdus  Illiistris  Regis  Angliie  Filius,  Prin- 
ceps  IValliie,  Comes  Cesti'ue,  Poiitivi  et  Montis  Trolli. 

Edward,  surnamed  Caernarvon,  succeeded  his  father  in  the  kingdom,  by  the 
name  of  Edward  IL  He  carried  the  royal  arms  on  his  seal  as  bis  father  and  grand- 
father, and  had  them  embroidered  on  his  surcoatand  caparisons  of  his  horse;  and  at 
the  sides  of  his  throne  were  two  little  castles,  to  show  his  maternal  descent  from 
C  ;stile.  He  married  Isabel,  daughter  to  Philip  IV.  surnamed  Le  Bel,  King  of 
France;  she,  upon  one  of  her  seals,  had  her  arms  j-cwtf  of  flower-de-luces,  dimidiate 
with  those  of  her  husband  King  Edward  II.;  and  on  another  of  her  seals  she  had 
her  efiigies  placed  betwixt  two  escutcheons,  that  on  her  right  hand  containing  the 
arms  of  England,  and  the  other,  on  the  left,  the  arms  of  France,  impaled  with  those 
of  Navarre,  upon  the  account  her  mother  was  the  daughter  and  heir  of  Henry  I. 
King  of  Navarre. 

She  bore  to  her  hushand  Edward  UI.  King  of  England,  John  of  Eltham,  so 
named  from  the  King's  manor-place  in  Kent  where  he  was  born,  and  was  Earl  of 
Cornwall,  who  carried  the  arms  of  England  within  a  bordure  of  France  ;  that  is, 
/ziiivr:',  j-fw/ of  flower-de-luces.  Jean  their  eldest  daughter  was  married  to  David 
Prince  of  Scotland,  son  and  heir  to  King  Robert  the  Bruce,  on  the  i8th  of  July, 
the  third  year  of  the  reign  of  Edward  111.  being  the  year  of  God  1329.  She 
died  without  issue,  in  rlie  thirty-second  of  Edward  III.  his  reign,  anno  1357, 
and  was  buried  in  the  church  of  Gray-Friars  in  London  ;  and  her  effigies  was  put 
in  a  niche  on  the  north  side  of  the  tomb  of  Qiieen  Philippa,  her  sister-in-law,  in 
Westminster  Abbey,  under  which  was  an  escutcheon  of  alabaster,  and  upon  it  was 
carved  and  painted  the  arms  of  Scotland  ;  the  lion  within  a  double  tressure,  im- 
paled with  those  of  England  on  the  left. 

Edward  III.  had  variety  of  seals  of  arms,  to  show  his  paternal  and  maternal 
descent ;  and  at  last  his  right  and  pretensions  to  France,  which  became  a  fixed 
ensign  to  his  successors  kings  of  England.  He  was  crowned  on  the  ist  of  Febru- 
ary 1327;  on  his  first  seal  of  arms  he  is  placed  in  a  throne  between  two  flower- 
de-luces,  to  show  his  maternal  descent  from  France,  as  his  father  did  before,  placing 
two  castles  to  show  his  descent  from  Castile.  His  second  royal  seal  which  he  used, 
had  the  arms  of  England  quartered  in  the  first  place,  with  those  of  France 
in  the  second,  seme  of  flower-de-luces  oi-,  as  a  coat  of  alliance  ;  of  wliich  be- 
fore. 

In  the  fourteenth  year  of  his  reign,  not  being  content  to  hold  forth  his  alliance 
to  France,  but  to  shovv  his  right  to  that  crown,  he  placed  the  arms  of  Fiance,  as 
arms  of  dominion,  before  those  of  England;  as  in  the  Royal  Plate  in  this  Volume, 
and  in  my  Essay,  Plate  V.  fig.  8.  being  agreeable  to  the  practice  of  some  nations, 
and  so  formed  his  new  seal  of  arms.  The  other  great  seal  of  England,  with  England 
and  France  quarterly,  was  ordered,  says  Sandford,  to  be  kept  in  the  wardrobe  ;  and 
that  the  new  great  seal  might  be  made  more  public,  he  caused  impressions  thereof, 
and  of  his  privy  seal,  to  be  made,  and  sent  to  all  the  sheriffs  of  England.  He  also 
wrote  a  letter,  dated  thus  :  "  The  8th  of  February,  in  the  ist  year  of  his  reign 
"  over  France,  and  14th  over  England,  to  the  prelates,  peers,  and  commons  of 
"  France,  thereby  signifying, — That  Charles,  late  King  of  France,  his  mother's 
"  brother,  being  dead,  that  kingdom  was  fallen  to  him  by  law ;  and  that  Philip  de 
"  Valois,  son  to  the  uncle  of  the  said  king,  had,  by  force,  in  his  minority,  intruded 
"  into  that  kingdom,  and  detained  it ;  lest  therefore  he  should  seem  to  neglect  his 


9- 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  Isfc. 


"  own  right,  he  thought  good  to  own  the  title  of  France,  and  to  take  on  him  the 
"  defence  and  government  thereof. " 

I  shall  here  describe  his  seal  of  arms :  Upon  the  one  side  he  is  represented  sit- 
ting in  a  throne,  with  an  open  crown  on  his  head,  (for  closs  crowns  were  not  used 
then  by  kings)  heightened  with  figures  like  trefoil  leaves,  holding  in  his  right  hand  a 
sceptre,  and  in  his  left  a  mond  crossed  and  ensigned  with  a  cross  forme ;  and  at 
the  sides  of  the  throne  were  shields,  with  the  arms  of  France  and  England  quarter- 
ly. Upon  the  reverse,  or  other  side  of  the  seal,  he  is  again  represented  on  horse- 
back in  his  coat  of  mail  and  surcoat,  with  a  helmet  on  his  head,  and  upon  it  a 
chapeau,  or  cap  of  state,  turned  up  ermine,  whereupon  stood  a  Y\on  passant  gardant, 
and  crowned  with  an  open  crown,  which  became  afterwards  the  crest  of  the  im- 
perial achievement  of  England  ;  and  he  was  the  first  king  of  England  who  used  a 
crest  on  his  seal  of  arms  :  by  his  right  hand  he  held  a  sword,  and  by  his  left  a 
shield  with  the  arms  of  France,  azure,  seme  of  flower-de-luces,  and  England  as 
before,  quarterly  :  which  arms  were  embroidered  upon  his  surcoat  and  caparisons 
of  his  horse  ;  and  round  both  the  sides  of  the  seal  were  these  titles,  Ed%vardiis  Dei 
Gratia  Rex  Franciae  et  AngUae,  Dominus  Hiberniae  :  which  seal  Mr  Speed  and 
Sandford  give  us  cut  in  their  Flistories. 

Upon  this  King's  pretension  and  variation  of  his  arms,  in  assuming  those  of 
France,  there  were  some  verses  made  at  the  time  for  England,  and  others  in  behalf 
of  the  French,  which  Hoppingius  gives  us  in  his  de  Jure  Insignium,  which  I  pre- 
sume to  insert  here.     For  the  English  thus  : 

Rex  sum  regnorum  bina  ratione  duorum, 
Anglorum  regno  sum  lex  ego  jure  pateino, 
Matris  jure  quidem  Gallorum  nuncupor  idem  j 
Hinc  est  : 


Answered  by  France  thus : 

Prfedo  regnorum,  qui  diceris  esse  duorum, 

Francorum  (i.  e.  matemo)  regno  privaberis  atque  paterno, 

Mater  (al.  matris)  ubi  nullum  jus  proles  (al.  natus)  non  habet  uUu 

Jure  marlti  carens,  alia  est  mulier  prior  ilia  ; 

Hinc  est  armorum  variatio  stulta  tuorum. 


By  alia  est  mulier  prior  ilia  they  understood  there  was  another  daughter  of 
France,  to  wit,  Jean  of  Navarre,  nearer  the  crown  than  Isabel  the  mother  of  Ed- 
ward III.  The  descent  of  that  royal  family,  for  that  time,  I  shall  here  mention 
from  many  historians,  especially  John  de  Serre  in  his  Inventory  of  the  General 
History  of  France,  printed  at  Paris  1620,  and  Gabriel  Richardson  his  Estate  of 
Europe,  printed  at  Oxford  1627. 

Philip  III.  of  that  name.  King  of  France,  had  two  sons,  Philip  and  Charles 
Count  de  Valois. 

Phihp  IV.  of  that  name,  surnamed  Le  Bel,  succeeded  his  father,  and  married 
Jean  Queen  of  Navarre,  from  whence  he  took  the  title  of  King  before  the  de- 
cease ot  his  father.  He  had  issue  three  sons  and  a  daughter,  viz.  Lewis  X.  sur- 
named Hutten,  Philip  V.  called  Le  Lang,  Charles  IV.  called  the  Fair,  and  a 
daughter,  Isabel,  married  to  Edward  II.  father  and  mother  of  Edward  III. 

The  eldest  son  Lewis  X.  had  only  a  daughter,  Jean  ;  Philip  and  Charles,  who 
were  successively  kings,  had  no  issue-male. 

After  her  father  Lewis's  death,  Jean  was  married  to  Count  d'  Evereux,  and  to 
him  she  brought  the  title  of  King  of  Navarre,  from  whom  are  descended  all  the 
succeeding  Kings  of  Navarre;  which  came  at  last  to  be  again  united  in  the  person 
of  Henry  III.  oif  Navarre,  and  IV.  of  France,  in  whose  posterity  these  crowns 
remain  still  united. 

Charles  de  Valois,  second  son  of  Philip  III.  had  a  son,  Philip,  who,  as  heir-male, 
by  the  Salic  law,  succeeding  to  the  crown,  excluded  Isabel,  mother  of  Edward  III. 
and  also  her  niece,  Jean  Qiieen  of  Navarre. 

King  Edward  III.  married  Philippa,  second  daughter  of  William  Earl  of  Hain- 
ault,  in  the  year   1327.     She  had  to  King  Edward  a  numerous  issue,  of  which 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  Uc.  93 

£  cannot  insist  here.  The  English  were  at  that  time  nicely  known  in  armories, 
especially  in  diflerencing  the  numerous  issue  of  the  royal  tumily,  and  the  practice 
in  marihulling  many  coats  in  one  shield  was  first  begun  by  that  King ;  and,  in 
imitation  of  him,  not  only  his  numerous  issue,  but  also  his  subjects,  did  improve 
the  practice  of  compjsuig  and  marshalhng  arms. 

Edward  of  Woodstock,  so  named  from  the  place  of  his  birth,  eldest  son  of  King 
Edward  111.  was  by  his  father  created  Duke  of  Cornwall,  and  afierwards  was 
made  Prmce  of  W.iles,  and  carried  arms  as  his  father,  France  and  England,  quar- 
terly, with  a  label  of  three  points,  and  round  liis  seal  were  these  words,  Si^.  Eil- 
•watdi  primogeiiiti,  Pnncipis  Ajuitaiiia:  et  iValiiie,  Diuis  Coniiibite,  et  Cfjtiinis  Cf stria;. 
This  prmce  took  to  wife  Jane  Countess  of  ICenf,  who  carried  the  arms  of  England 
within  a  bordure  argent ;  she  bore  to  Prince  Edward  a  son  Richakd,  during  iiis 
ftither  and  grandfather's  hfe  :  he  carried  the  arms  of  France  and  England,  quarter- 
ly, with  his  tather's  label  of  three  points  argent ;  but,  for  his  proper  ditVerence,  he 
charged,  the  middle  point  of  the  label  with  the  cross  of  St  George  ;  as  in  the  Cata- 
logue of  the  Knights  of  the  Garter,  of  which  that  young  prince  was  one  :  And 
after  his  father's  death  he  carried,  as  his  father  did,  the  label  plain  ;  and  when  his 
grandfather  died,  he  was  crowned  king  the  eleventh  year  of  his  age,  and  had  his 
royal  seal  just  as  his  grandfather  before  described.  This  King  Richard  11.  as  1 
have  shown  before,  impaled  Edward  the  Confessor's  arms  with  those  of  France  and 
England ;  and  he  was  the  first  king  of  England  that  used  supporters,  being  two 
angels,  and  beneath  the  shield  was  placed,  for  device,  a  white  hart  cmcbant  under 
a  tree,  collared  with  a  chain  thereto  ailixed  :  And  this  was  the  device  used  by  his 
motner  Princess  Jane;  which  afterwards  became  the  badge  of  the  loyalists,  who 
stood  for  his  right,  for  which  many  of  them  lost  their  hves.  King  Richard  being 
dethroned. 

But  to  proceed  into  the  detail  of  the  kings  of  England,  as  I  proposed,  with  their 
arms  and  devices. 

Kenry,  surnamed  Bolingbroke  in,  Lincolnshire,  where  he  was  born  about  the 
year  1366,  was  the  only  son  of  John  of  Gaunt,  Duke  of  Lancaster,  (fourth  son  of 
King  Edward  111.)  by  Blanche  his  wife,  daughter  and  heir  of  Henry  the  first  Duke 
of  Lancaster,  son  of  Henry  Earl  of  Lancaster,  son  of  Edmund,  surnamed  Crouch- 
hack,  the  first  Earl  of  Lancaster,  second  son  of  King  Henry  III. 

This  Henry  of  Bolingbroke,  being  Duke  of  Lancaster  in  right  of  his  grand- 
father, he  carried  only  his  arms,  (and  not  his  father's,  which  were  France  and 
England  quarterly),  gules,  three  lions  passant  gardant  or,  with  a  label  of  France, 
azure,  seme  of  Hower-de-luces,  from  whom  he  derived  his  title  to  the  crown,  having 
forced  Richard  11.  to  renounce  the  same,  and  was  crowned  King  at  Westminster 
the  13th  of  October  1399,  by  the  name  of  Henry  IV.  And,  as  he  usurped  the 
crown,  so  he  usurped  King  Richard's  seal,  as  Sandford  observes,  for  his  first  seal 
only  razing  out  the  word  Ricardus,  and  engraving  in  its  place  Henricus  :  He  did 
not  make  use  of  the  arms  of  Edward  the  Confessor,  as  Richard  did  in  his  new  seal, 
nor  use  his  supporters.  He  married  Mary  de  Bohun,  daughter  and  heir  of  Hum- 
phrey Earl  of  Hereford,  Essex,  and  Northampton  ;  with,  whom  he  got  these  earl- 
doms, and  had  many  children. 

The  eldest  son  Henry  of  Lancaster,  surnamed  Monmouth,  from  the  place  where 
he  was  born,  and  Prince  of  Wales  1388,  who,  as  such,  in  the  sixth  year  of  his 
father's  reign,  carried  the  arms  of  France  and  England,  quarterly,  with  a  label 
of  three  points  argent,  for  his  filial  difference.  And  it  is  to  be  observed,  that 
the  indefinite  number  of  the  flower-de-luces,  in  the  arms  of  France,  were  re- 
duced to  the  number  three  by  this  prince,  in  imitation  of  King  Charles  VI.  of 
France,  who  reduced  them  to  that  number,  and  ever  since  they  have  continued 
three  in  France  and  England.  After  the  demise  of  his  father  Henry  IV.  he 
was  crowned  king  by  the  name  of  Henry  V.  and  caused  a  magnificent  seal  to  be 
made  for  him,  which  is  to  be  seen  in  Sandford's  History.  It  was  he  that  over-ran 
France  with  force,  and  that  necessitated  Charles  of  France  to  give  hint  his  daugh- 
ter Catharine  in  marriage,  and  declare  him  regent  and  heir  to  the  crown  of 
France. 

Catharine  was  crowned  Queen  of  England  at  Westminster,  the  14th  of  Febru- 
ary 1420 ;  in  which  ceremony  King  James  I.  of  Scotland  assisted :  and  shortly 

Vol.  IL  A  a. 


f,4  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  y<r.. 

after  King  Henry  V.  died  in  France  the  last  day  of  August  1422,  leaving  only 
one  son,  Prince  Henry.  His  body  was  brought  to  Rouen,  in  order  to  be  conveyed 
to  England,  and  put  in  a  lead  coffin,  and  placed  in  a  chariot  drawn  by  four  horses ; 
and  above  his  coihn  was  his  image  of  leather  painted  to  the  life ;  upon  the  head 
an  imperial  diadem  ;  and  on  the  body  a  purple  robe  furred  with  ermine,  in  his 
right  hand  a  sceptre,  and  a  mond  in  his  left :  and,  as  the  chariot  passed  through 
any  town  of  note,  there  was  borne  over  it  a  canopy  of  great  value  by  persons  of 
quality  till  he  came  to  Calais.  Upon  the  covering  of  the  four  horses  that  drew 
the  chariot  were  embroidered  the  arms  of  England  alone ;  upon  the  second  horse 
the  arms  of  France  and  England  quarterly ;  upon  the  cover  of  the  third  horse  the 
arms  of  France  alone  ;  and  on  the  fourth  the  arms  of  King  Arthur,  viz.  azure, 
three  crowns  in  pale  or.  He  was  interred  in  the  abbey  of  St  Peter's  at  Westmin- 
ster, at  the  feet  of  Edward  the  Confessor,  with  this  epitaph  : 

Dux  Normannorum,  verus  Conquestor  eorum, 
Hasres  Francorum,  decessit,  et  Hector  eorum. 

Queen  Catharine  had  her  arms,  being  those  of  France,  impaled  with  those  of 
her  husband  Henry  V.  (not  only  in  paintings,  but  on  her  seals)  in  one  escutcheon, 
which  was  ensigned  with  an  open  crown,  and  supported  by  two  antelopes,  collared 
with  open  crowns,  and  chains  thereto  affixed  or,  with  the  circumscription,  Si^il. 
Catharinae,  Filia  CaroU  Regis  Franciae,  Retina  Angliae  et  Domina  Hiberniae. 
After  the  death  of  King  Henry  she  married  Owen  Ap-Meredith  Ap-Tudor,  a  Welsh- 
man, descended  of  the  old  kings  of  Britain  ;  and  of  their  issue  came  Henry  VIL  ; 
of  whom  in  his  proper  place. 

Henry  VI.  upon  his  father's  death,  being  but  nine  months  old,  was  proclaimed 
King  of  England  ;  and,  about  a  month  after,  was  proclaimed  King  of  France  at 
Paris,  upon  the  demise  of  his  grandfather  King  Charles  VI.  of  France,  anno  142 1. 
His  grand-uncles  were  his  guardians  ;  and  when  he  came  to  the  age  of  eight  years 
he  was  solemnly  crowned  King  of  England  at  Westminster,  tlie  6th  of  Novemr 
ber  1429. 

The  first  royal  seal  this  King  used  was,  in  its  structure,  like-  unto  that'  of  hi* 
grandfather  Henry  IV. ;  but  afterwards  he  caused  make  another  more  apposite  to- 
France,  whereon  he  is  represented  enthronized  with  an  open  crown  upon  his  head, 
a  sceptre  topped  with  a  tlower-de-luce  in  his  right  hand ;  and  in  his  left  the  ivory 
rod  with  the  hand  of  justice,  one  of  the  peculiar  royal  ensigns  of  France  ;  and  at 
each  side  of  the  throne  an  escutcheon  ;  that  on  the  right  with  three  ilower-de- 
luces  for  France,  and  the  other  on  the  left  side  had  the  arms  of  France  and  Eng- 
land quarterly  ;  and  both  escutcheons  were  ensigned  with  open  crowns  :  Which 
practice  of  his,  in  trimming  escutcheons  with  crowns  on  the  seals  of  England,  is 
observed  to  be  the  first  to  be  met  with.  Upon  the  reverse,  or  the  other  side  of  the 
seal,  was  an  angel  in  a  dalmatic  habit,  holding  in  its  right  hand  a  sceptre,  and  in 
the  left  the  ivory  rod  with  the  hand  of  justice;  and  before  the  angel  are  two  es- 
cutcheons placed  accolle,  and  charged  as  the  above  other  two,  but  not  ensigned 
with  crowns:  and  this  side  of  the  seal  was  after  the  fashion. of  the  reverse  of  the 
royal  seal  of  France,  which  has  no  equestrian  side ;  that  is,  the  figure  of  a  man  on 
horseback  ;  as  with  the  English,  with  us,  and  other  countries.  This- seal,  on  both 
sides,  was  circumsribed,  Henricus  Dei  Gratia  Francormn  et  Angliae  Rex,  which  this 
King  had  upon  his  coins,  called  the  rose  noble,  because  the  escutcheon  of  his 
;irms  lies  upon  a  rose  on  the  one  side,  and  on  the  other  his  effigies  crowned  with 
an  arch-diadem, ;  so  that  he  is  observed  to  be  the  first  king  of  England  that  wore- 
a  close  crown,  which  his  successors  continued  :  and  when  his  arms  were  placed  on 
public  buildings  they  were  supported  by  two  antelopes.  He  married  Margaret, 
daughter  of  Rene  Dukeof  Anjou,  titular  King  of  Jerusalem,  Sicily,  Arragon,  See. 
This  King  Henry  VI.  and  his  son  Edward  Prince  of  Wales  were  cut  off  by  the 
Yorkists  when  they  set  up  for  the  crown. 

Edward  IV.  the  head  of  the  House  of  York,  the  eldest  surviving  son  of  Richard 
Duke  of  York,  and  his  wife  Anne  Mortimer,  sister  and  afterwards  heir  to  her 
brother  Edward  Earl  of  March,  and  daughter  to  Roger  Mortimer  Earl  of  March, 
son  of  Phihppa,  only  daughter  and  heir  of  Lionel  Duke  of  Clarence,  third,  son  to 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ^c.  95 

King  Edward  IIL  in  whose  right  the  family  of  York  claimed  the  cmwn  ;  and' the 
last  named  Richard  Duke  of  York,  was  son  and  representative  of  Ldmund  Lang-- 
by  Duke  of  York,  fifth  son  of  Edward  ill,  great  grandfather  of  Edward  IV.  who 
deposed  King  Henry  VL  by  force  of  arms,  and  was  crowned  king  the  28th  of 
June  1461.  Upon  his  seal  he  is-  represented  in  his  royal  robes  on  a  tinone,  and  on 
his  head  an  arched  crown,  and  below  the  throne  a  white  rose,  the  badge  of  the 
family  of  York.  The  opposite  family,  Lancaster,  used  a  red  tor  then-  badge, 
which  the  fautors  and  followers  of  these  two  contending  families  did  afterwards 
bear  for  distinction  in  that  bloody  war  betwixt  these  families.  Upon  the  other  side  of 
his  seal  he  is  repre)-ented,  as  the  kings  of  England  used  to  be,  on  horseback,  his 
shield,  surcoat,  and  caparisons  of  his-  horse,  charged  with  the  arms  of  France  and 
England  quarterly  ;  with  this  singularity,  that  the  crown  upon  his  head  was  closed 
with  arches,  (the  first  seen  in  England  on  seals)  and  upon  it  for  crest  the  lion 
passant  giirdant.  This  king  hud  many  devices,  with  which  he  used  to  adorn  his- 
arms  set  up  on  public  places :  Sometimes  they  were  supported  with  the  bull  of 
Clare  and  the  lion  of  March,  and  on  other  places  with  the  white  hart,  the  device 
of  Richard  H.  but  most  commonly  with  two  lions  gardant,  the  supporters  of  the 
Earl  of  March.  But  more  particularly  of  these  in  my  intended  Treatise  of  Exte- 
rior Ornaments.  He  married  Elizabeth,  (widow  of  Sir  John  Grey  of  Groby) 
daughter  of  Sir  Richard- Widville  knight,  afterwards  Earl  Rivers.  King  Edward 
IV.  was  the  first  king  of  England  that  married  a  subject,  and  made  her  a  queen  ; 
and,  to  qualify  her  for  his  royal  bed  and  escutcheon,  she  carried  six  coats  of  arms 
of  her  paternal  and  maternal  descents.  She.  bore  to  him  three  sons  and  seven 
daughters. 

Edward  the  eldest,  who  succeeded  by  the  name  of  Edward  V.  carried  arms 
as  his  father :  Richard,  the  second  son,  was  created  Duke  of  York  ;  George,  the 
third  son,  created  Dake  of  Bedford,  died  a  child;  the  other  two  sons,  being  under 
the  guardianship  of  their  uncle  Richard  Duke  of  Gloucester,  he  most  cruelly 
caused  these  young  princes  to  be  cut  off,  and  himself  to  be  proclaimed  King  of 
England  1483,  by  the  name  of  Richard  III.  l"he  seal  he  used  was  after  the  same 
form  with  that  of  his  brother  Edward  IV.  and  his  arms  on  some  public  places 
were  supported  with  two  boars,  and  in  other  places  with  a  bull  on  the  right  side, 
and  a  boar  on  the  left.  The  silver  boar,  with  tusks  an^  bristles  of  gold,  was  one 
of  the  devices  of  the  house  of  York.  This  King  Richard  was  defeated  and  killed  at 
the  battle  of  Bosworth,  1485,  by  Henry  Earl  of  Richmond,  who-  was  afterwards 
king  by  the  name  of 

Henry  VII.  the  son  of  Edmund  of  Hadhum,  (eldest  son  of  Owen-  Ap-Meredith 
Ap-Tudor  and  Qiieen  Catharine,  widow  of  Henry  V.)  by  Margaret,  sole  daughter 
of  John  Duke  of  Somerset,  son  of  John  Earl  of  Somerset,  son  of  John  of  Gaunt 
Duke  of  Lancaster,  and  of  Katharine- Swynford,  his  third  wife. 

Henry  VII.  married  Lady  Elizabeth,  eldest  daughter  of  Edward  IV.  upon  which 
the  two  houses  of  York  and  Lancaster  were  united,  and  their  badges,  the  white  and 
red  roses,  were  joined  per  pale.  His  seal  of  arms  was,  after  the  form  of  his  prede- 
cessors, as  above,  carrying  France  and  England  quarterly.  His  other  armorial 
figures  and  trophies  are  to  be  found  in  his  glorious  monument  at  Westminster, 
where  his  arms  are  surrounded  with  the  garter,  the  principal  ensign  of  that  or- 
der, and  ensigned  with  an  arched'  crown  at  the  head  of  the  monument.  There 
i^  a  large  rose,  supported  on  the  right  side  by  a  red  dragon,  and  on  the  left  by  a 
greyhound  argent,  coWd^xtA.  gules  ;  the  first  being  the  figure  of  Cadwallader,  the 
last  king  of  the  Britons,  from  whom,  by  a  male  line,  he  is  said  to  derive  his  pe- 
digree :  Which  figure  he  had  on  his  standard  at  the  battle  of  Bosworth,  when 
he  defeat  Richard  III.  and,  to  commemorate  the  dragon,  he  entitled  a  Pursuivant 
at  Arms  by  the  name  of  Kuge  Dragon.  His  monument  is  also  adorned  with  the 
portcuUis,  in  respect  of  his  descent  from  his  mother  of  the  family  of  Beaufort. 
At  the  foot  of  King  Henry  VII.  his  monument  are  the  arms  of  Elizabeth  his 
Qiieen,  impaled  with  his  arms  on  the  right,  being  France  and  England,  quarterly, 
with  his  on  the  left  quarterly;  first  France  and  England  quarterly  ;  second  the  arms 
of  Ulster  ;  third  Ulster  and  Mortimer,  quarterly  ;  and  fourth  as  the  first,  ensigned. 
with  a.closs  crown,  and  supported  by  two  angels. 


g6  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ^c. 

Henry  VIL  the  first  king  of  the  surname  of  Tucor,  died  at  his  palace  of  Rieli- 
mond  the  aist  of  April  1509,  and  his  body  was  interred  in  the  royal  chapel  at 
Westminster.  He  had  with  his  queen,  jElizabeth,  three  sons  and  four  daughters. 
Arthur  Tudor,  the  eldest.  Prince  of  Wales,  and  Duke  of  Cornwall,  at  the  age  of 
fifteen  married  Catharine,  daughter  of  Ferdinand  King  of  Spain ;  he  lived  with 
her  four  months  and  nineteen  days,  and  died  without  issue.  His  arms  on  his 
tomb  are  those  of  England,  with  a  label  of  three  points,  supported  by  two  ante- 
lopes, and  ensigned  with  a  coronet  heightened  with  cross  patees,  and  tlower-de- 
luces;  and  below  the  shield  of  arms  three  ostrich  feathers  with  a  scroll,  the  badge 
of  the  Prince  of  Wales.  The  second  son,  Henry,  succeeded  his  father;  the  third 
son,  Edmund  Tudor  Duke  of  Somerset,  died  young.  The  eldest  daughter,  Mar- 
garet Tudor,  born  29th  of  November  1489,  at  the  age  of  fourteen  was  marrried 
to  James  IV.  King  of  Scotland;  the  second  daughter,  Elizabeth  died  young j  the 
third,  Mary  Tudor,  was  Queen  of  France,  and  afterwards  Dutchess  of  Suftblk;  the 
fourth  daughter  died  young. 

Henry  VIIL  was  crowned  24th  June  1509;  he  had  two  seals,  one  when  Pope 
Leo  X.  conferred  upon  him  the  title  of  Defender  of  the  Faith,  and  the  other  be- 
hoved to  be  made  after  he  was  declared  in  Parliament  Head  of  the  Church  of 
Enghind.  On  the  first  he  is  stiled  Henricus  VIII.  Angliue  et  Frmiciae  Rex,  Fidei 
Defensor,  et  Dominus  Hiberniae ;  on  the  other  seal  Henricus  Fill.  Dei  Gratia,  An- 
gUae  Franciae  et  Hiberniae  Rex,  Fidei  Defensor,  et  in  Terra  Ecclesiae  Anglicanae 
et  Hiberniae  Supremum  Caput.  In  his  escutcheon  of  arms  were  those  of  France  and 
England,  quarterly;  France  still  first,  though  in  his  titles  England  be  named, first;, 
and  though  designed  King  of  Ireland,  yet  the  arms  of  Ireland  were  not  in  his  es- 
cutcheon, which  was  surrounded  with  the  ensign  of  the  Garter:  In  imitation  ot 
which,  the  other  Knights  Companions  of  that  Order  encompassed  their  escutcheons 
afterwards  with  the  Garter.  Upon  several  public  places,  where  his  shield  of  arms 
was  erected,  it  is  sometimes  supported  with  a  dragon  and  greyhound  ;  and  in  other 
places,  afterwards,  with  one  of  the  Lions  of  England  crowned,  and  with  the  red 
dragon  on  the  left. 

He  married  first  his  brother's  wife,  Catharine,  who  bore  to  him  Queen  Mary ; 
and  after  her  divorce  he  married  Anne  Boleyne,  who  bore  Queen  Elizabeth:  After 
her  death,  Jane  Seymour;  she  bore  King  Edward  VI.  And  after  her  Anne,, 
daughter  to  WiUiam  Duke  of  Cleves.  She  being  divorced,  he  married  Catharine 
Howard,  niece  to  the  Duke  of  Norfolk.  And,  lastly,  he  was  married  to  Catharine 
Parr,  who  survived  him.     He  died  at  Westminster,  January  8.  1546. 

Edward  VI.  was  crowned  at  Westminster  the  25th  of  February  1547;  being 
young,  was  under  the  tutory  of  his  uncle,  Edward  Duke  of  Somerset,  who  go- 
verned the  kingdom.  The  seal  of  this  king's  arms  was  little  difterent  from  that  of 
his  father,  having  the  same  titles.  He  died  at  Greenwich  the  sixteenth  year  of  his 
age,  when  he  had  reigned  six  years,  five  months  and  nine  days.  In  his  reign  there 
was  an  order  for  the  change  of  the  knighthood  of  St  George,  to  be  called  the. 
Order  of  the  Garter,  because  St  George  fighting  with  the  dragon  looked  too  miich, 
like  a  legend. 

Mary,  eldest  daughter  of  King  Henry  VIII.  by  his  first  wife.  Queen  Catharine, 
was  crowned  at  Westminster  the  30th  of  November  1553;  she  used  the  arms  as 
her  father  and  brother  did.  Upon  the  5th  of  July  1554  she  was  married  to 
Philip  Prince  of  Spain,  son  of  Charles  V.  Emperor.  Upon  their  royal  seal  they 
are  both  represented  seated  in  a  throne  under  a  canopy.  King  Philip  on  the  right, 
and  Queen  Mary  on  the  left,  with  arched  crowns  on  their  heads,  he  holding  a 
sword  in  his  right,  and  she  a  sceptre  in  her  left;  between  them  an  altar,  and  car- 
ved on  the  tablature  the  letters  P.  and  M.  for  Phihp  and  Mary;  and  upon  the  altar 
is  placed  a  mond,  or  globe,  sustained  by  the  left  hand  of  the  king,  and  by  the 
right  of  the  queen;  and  above,  as  it  were  at  their  back,  is  the  royal  escutcheon, 
containing  their  arms  impaled  ;  first  Philip's  arms,  parti  per  fesse,  the  chief  part, 
quarterly,  of  foiur  pieces ;  first  Castile  and  Leon,  quarterly ;  second  Arragon  im- 
paled with  Sicily;  third  as  the  second,  and  fourth  as  the  first:  The  base  part  of 
the  escutcheon  is  also  quarterly  of  four  areas;  first  Austria  Modern,  second  Bur- 
gundy Modern,  third  Ancient  Burgundy,  and  fourth  Brabant;  over  all  an  es- 
cutcheon, Flanders  impaled  with  Tyrol,  all  impaled  with  France  and  England, 
1 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ^c. 


97 


quarterly,  being  the  arms  of  Qiieen  Mary.  The  arms  were  surrounded  v;ith  the 
Garter,  and  ensigned  with  an  imperial  arched  crown,  the  escutcheon  supported  by 
an  eagle  on  the  sight  side,  and,  on  the  left,  by  a  lion  rampant  ^aidant.  The 
seal  is  circumsbribed,  Philippus  et  Maria  Dei  Gratia  Rex  et  Regina  Aji^Uae,  His- 
paniorum,  Franciae,  utriusqiie  Siciliae,  J'erusa/ein  et  Hiberiiiae,  Fidei  Dcfensores.  On 
the  reverse,  or  counter-seal,  the  king  and  queen  are  represented  on  horseback,  he 
with  a  cap  on  his  head,  and  a  sword  in  his  right  hand,  and  she  in  her  hood,  and 
a  sceptre  in  her  left  hand,  and  behind  their  backs  the  foresaid  achievement;  and 
the  legend  round  that  side  of  the  seal,  .iriijiduees  yJustriae,  Duces  Burguudiae, 
Mediolani  et  Brnbantiae,  Comites  Hapsurgi,  Flandriae  et  Tiralis.  Queen  Mary  died 
without  issue  1558,  and  lies  interred  in  the  chapel  of  King  Henry  Vll. 

Qiicen  Elizabeth,  second  daughter  of  King  Henry  VilL  by  his  second  wife, 
Anne  Boleyne,  was  crowned  the  15th  of  January  155!).  Upon  lier  royal  seal  she 
is  represented  on  a  throne  in  her  robes,  with  an  arched  crown  on  her  head,  the 
sceptre  in  her  right,  and  the  globe  in  lier  left  hand ;  and  at  eacii  side  of  the  throne 
are  escutcheons  of  the  arms  of  France  and  England,  quarterly,  siuTounded  with 
garters,  and  ensigned  with  imperial  crowns. 

The  ground  of  the  reverse,  or  counter-seal,  is  powdered  with  roses,  flower-de- 
luces,  and  harps,  all  ensigned  with  crowns,  for  England,  France,  and  Ireland ;  and 
the  harp  for  the  last  kingdom  is  the  first  time  tliat  it  ever  appeared  upon  any  seals 
of  the  sovereigns  of  England.  On  this  reverse  the  queen  is  represented  on  horse- 
back in  her  royal  robes,  as  before,  overshadowed  by  a  cloud,  the  emblem  of 
heavenly  protection:  Her  horse  is  riclily  trapped,  and  her  foot-cloth  gorgeously 
embroidered ;  and  on  both  sides  of  the  seal  are  circumscribed  these  words,  Eliza- 
beth Dei  Gratia  Angliae  Franciae  et  Hiberniae  Reginn,  Fidei  Defensor,  with  a  rose 
betwixt  each  word.  She  died  unmarried  the  24th  of  March  1602,  the  sixty-ninth 
year  of  her  age,  having  reigned  forty-four  years ;  she  was  interred  in  Westminster. 
Upon  her  tomb  her  escutcheon  of  arms  is  supported  on  the  right  side  by  a  lion  of 
England  crowned,  and,  on  the  left,  by  a  red  dragon ;  and  on  the  frieze  of  that  mo- 
nument are  carved  the  arms  of  her  paternal  and  maternal  descent;  For  which  seals 
see  Sandford's  Genealogical  History  of  England. 

Since  I  have  given  an  account  of  the  ancient  ensigns  of  the  kingdom  of  South 
Britain,  and  a  short  deduction  of  the  sovereigns  since  William  the  Conqueror, 
with  their  seals  of  arms,  to  King  James  L  of  Great  Britain,  I  cannot  but  here  in- 
sist a  little  on  the  ensigns  and  arms  of  those  of  North  Britain;  and  then  show  ho\v 
those  of  Scotland  and  England  are  joined  together,  and  marshalled  with  others  at " 
this  time. 

The  first  ensign  used  by  the  Scots  (as  by  our  own  and  foreign  writers)  was  a 
lion  rampant  carried  by  Fergus  L  King  of  Scotland,  long  before  the  Incarnation  of 
our  Saviour,  when  he,  with  his  subjects,  defeated  and  broke  into  the  camp  of  the 
Picts,  invaders  of  a  part  of  Scotland,  took  then  for  his  armorial  figure  a  lion  ram- 
pant: For  vvhidi  the  learned  Sir  George  Mackenzie  brings  for  his  voucher  Hop- 
pingius  de  Jure  Insigniuin,  a  judicious  Jawyer  and  antiquary.  His  words  are,  "  Cum 
"  Picti  in  agros  Scotorum  copias  primuin  ducerent,  quibus,  hand  minus  cupide, 
"  quam  strenue,  obviam  ivit  Fergusius  ;  sublatis  signis,  &  rumpendo  ipsorum 
"  claustra,  assumpsitque  leonem  rubeum  erectum,  aurea  facie  descriptum,  cauda 
"  tergum,  ut  fere  mos  est,  dum  se  ad  pugnam  mcitat,  verberans,  eoque  generose 
"  iracundiam  significans."  It  is  observed  by  Boetius,  in  his  History  of  Scotland, 
lib.  I.  cap.  7.  and  lib.  10.  That  the  crown  placed  on  the  lion's  head,  the  crest  of 
the  arms  of  Scotland,  should  be  corona  vallaris,  though  our  painters  crown  him 
with  an  im.perial  one ;  and  certainly,  says  Sir  George  Mackenzie,  in  his  Science 
of  Heraldry,  page  100.  corona  vallaris  agrees  better  with  the  breaking  of  the 
Picts'  barriers,  (than  any  modern  form  of  crowns)  for  vs'hicli  the  crest  was  first 
assumed. 

Anciently  princes  and  chief  commanders,  since  ever  war  began  in  the  world, 
had  ensigns  and  banners  with  some  figure  or  other  for  distinction  sake,  according 
to  their  genius  and  fancy.  But  these  I  do  not  take  for  hereditary  arms  for  dis- 
tinguishing families,  as  before  defined;  yet  these  figures  of  the  ancients  might  have 
been  continued,  as  the  armorial  figures  of  their  kingdom,  and  especially  that  of 
Scotland,  having  never  been  beat  down  by  any  conquerors,  whose  ensigns  we  would 

Vol.  i:.  B'b 


c^8  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  l^c. 

have  been  erected,  and  those  of  the  conquered  beat  down,  as  I  mentioned  beforer 
'Tis  presumed,  that  'tis  thus  happened  with  King  Fergus  his  lion,  now  to  be  the 
armorial  figure  of  Scotland. 

I  shall  mention  another  ancient  author  for  the  kings  of  Scotland  anciently  car- 
rying only  a  lion  rampant  ^iiles,  before  they  got  the  double  tressure  from  Charle- 
magne, as  a  badge  of  the  league  betwixt  him  and  Achaius  King  of  Scotland. 

Bonaventura  Strachan,  m  his  manuscript  Germania  per  Scotos  Christiana,  tells 
us,  that  the  kings  of  Scotland  carried  of  old  a  lion  rampant  gules,  in  a  field  ar.. 
His  words  are,  "  Reges  Scotorum  non  alia  antiquitus  praferebant  insignia,  quam 
"  leonem  rubrum  unguibus  in  proximos  assurgentem  (which  he  gives  for  the  term 
"  rampant)  in  aurea  planitia ;"  for  which  he  cites  Arnoldus  Uvion,  a  very  ancient 
writer,  who,  in  his  manuscript  titled  /;/  additionihus  ad  lignum  vitae,  tells  us,  the 
first  arms  of  the  kings  of  Scotland  was  a  red  lion  in  a  field  of  gold  \  their  second 
arms  had  the  lion  surrounded  with  the  double  tressure  :  His  words  are,  "  Leonem 
"  rubeum  in  aurea  planitia,  primum  esse  regum  Scotorum  stemma,  leonem  vero 
"  cum  liliis  circumpositis,  stemma  secundum  :"  which  manuscripts  1  have  seen  in 
the  lawyers'  library. 

It  is  without  doubt  that  Charlemagne  entered  into  a  league  with  Achaius  King 
of  Scotland,  for  his  assistance  in  his  wars :  for  which  special  service  performed  by 
the  Scots,  the  French  King  encompassed  the  Scots  lion,  which  was  famous  all 
Europe  over,  with  a  double  tressure,  flowered  and  counter-flowered  with  a  flower- 
de-luces  (the  armorial  figures  of  France)  of  the  colour  of  the  lion,  to  show  that  it 
had  formerly  defended  the  French  lilies,  and  that  these  thereafter  shall  continue 
a  defence  for  the  Scots  lion,  and  as  a  badge  of  friendship,  which  has  still  continued. 
This  so  fully  instructed  by  ancient  and  modern  writers,  that  I  need  not  trouble 
my  reader  with  a  long  catalogue  of  them,  but  only  mention  what  the  fore-men- 
tioned learned  Hoppingius  de  Jure  Insignium,  cap.  ii.  parag.  3.  page  732.  (speak- 
ing of  the  reasons  and  occasions  of  multiplying  several  arms  with  armorial  figures 
in  one  shield)  mentions  of  leagues  and  contracts  ;  and,  for  an  example,  gives  us 
that  betwixt  Charlemagne  and  Achaius  King  of  the  Scots,  whose  successors  to  this 
day  carry  their  Hon  surrounded  with  the  double  tressure.  Our  author's  words  are, 
"  Quartus effectus  armorum  conjunctionis  est  foederis  quandoque  pix-beresymbolum. 
"  Ita  cum  inter  Carolum  Magnum  St  Scotos-  eorumque  regem  Achaium  ictum  est 
"  foedus,  in  hunc  usque  diem  rehgiose  perdurans ;  juncta  simul  duorum  regum,  ex 
"  liliis  contrapositis  &-  leone  rubeo,  formata  arma,  indicii  loco  fuerunt." 

It  will  not  be  amiss  to  speak  a  Uttle  to  the  armorial  seals  of  our  kings,  and  their 
ancientest  laws  extant,  which  points  at  arms  in  general,  without  any  particular  de- 
scription ;  as  these  of  Malcolm  II.  who  began-  his  reign  in  the  year  IC04,  and 
who,  with  the  consent  of  his  barons,  ordered  certain  fees  to  the  chancellor,  for  ap- 
pending the  king's  seal  to  charters  and  other  evidents  granted  by  his  Majesty.  I 
shall  add  here  a  part  of  the  law  above  cited,  "  Ordinaverunt  Cancellario  Regis 
"  fcedum  magni  sigilli,  pro  qualibet  hacta,  centum  libratorum  terrae,  &  ultra  pro 
"  foedo  sigilli,  decem  libras.  Item  pro  Htera  sasinae  supra  tali  hacta  Cancellario  duas 
"  solidas."  What  figures  were  on  the  seals  then  I  cannot  account  for,  having  never 
seen  any  of  them  :  but  our  historians  tell  us,  when  our  King  Malcolm  Canmore 
and  William  the  Conqueror  met  to  clear  marches  betwixt  Scotland  and  England, 
they  erected  a  cross  of  stone  at  Stanmuir,  with  the  arms  of  Scotland  on  the  north 
side  (the  lion  within  a  double  tressure)  and  those  of  the  Conqueror  (two  leopards 
on  the  south  side;)  Buchanan  says,  this  stone  or  cross  contained  the  statues  and 
arms  of  these  two  kings  on  both  sides,  visible  and  legible  for  many  ages. 

I  shall  not  insist  here  upon  the  laws  of  David  I.  in  Regiam  Majestatem,  lib.  3. 
cap.  8.  page  4th  and  5th,  chap.  3.  page  i.  anent  seals  of  arms,  not  only  carried  by 
the  sovereign;  but,  as  to  these  by  barons  and  gentry  of  the  kingdom,  that  they 
may  be  fixed  and  known  figures  of  their  families  to  their  writs  and  evidents  then 
granted,  which  were  only  verified  by  their  seals,  for  subscriptions  were  not  then 
in  use.  It  is  evident  from  the  130th  act  of  King  James  I.  perfectly  relative  to  the 
above-mentioned  statutes  of  Malcolm  and  David,  (which  then  shows  that  arms 
were  generally  used,  and  in  great  esteem  with  us)  viz.  that  every  freeholder  should 
compear  at  the  head  court  with  his  seal ;  and  if  he  cannot  come,  he  shall  send  his 
attorney  with  the  seal  of  his  arms.     And  it  was  a  common  practice  with  us,  till  of 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  bv.  99 

late,  that  gentlemen  sent  the  impression  of  their  seals  of  arms  in  lead  to  the  clerk 
of  court,  wh;ch  were  there  kept :  Sir  George  Mackenzie,  in  his  Science  of 
Heraldry,  tells  us  he  has  seen  many  of  them,  and  has  given  a  few  of  them  in  his 
Chapter  of  Supporters. 

It  is  very  reasonable  to  think,  that  all  seals  then,  since  the  reign  of  Malcolm  lU.  or 
King  David  I.  carried  the  fixed  arms  of  the  owners,  since  the  writs  to  which  they 
were  appended  made  faith  in  court,  without  any  subscription,  till  the  year  of  God 
1540,  at  which  time  King  James  V-  by  the  ii7,th  act  of  his  7th  pari.  (lest  seals 
should  be  countefeit  or  lost)  ordained  all  evidents  for  the  future  to  be  subscribed 
as  well  as  sealed. 

In  the  reigns  of  Malcolm  IV.  and  William  I.  grandsons  of  King  David  I.  many 
writs  and  evidents  were  granted  by  them  in  their  time  to  their  subjects,  to  which 
were  appended  their  seals.  I  have  seen  that  of  King  William,  who  began  liis 
reign  1165,  where  he  is  represented  on  a  throne,  in  liis  right  hand  a  sceptre,  and 
left  a  mond,  crossed  and  surmounted  with  a  long  cross  ;  that  is,  with  the  paler 
part  longer  than  the  traverse  :  on  the  other  side  of  the  shield,  called  the  reverse, 
he  is  there  represented  on  horseback,  in  his  right  hand  a  sword,  and  on  his  left  arm 
a  shield  of  Scotland,  and  the  legend  round  that  seal,  Sigillum  I'Villielm.  Regis  Seoto- 
rum  was  appended  by  that  king  to  a  charter  of  confirmation  of  the  lands  of  Seatoii 
and  others  to  Philip  de  Seaton,  w  hich  is  in  the  Earl  of  Winton's  charter-chest. 

Alex.^nder  II.  son  of  King  William ;  on  his  seal  he  is  represented  as  his  father, 
enthronized  on  the  one  side,  and  on  the  other  upon  horseback,  holding  in  his  right 
hand  a  sword,  and  on  his  left  arm  a  shield,  charged  with  a  lion  rampant  within  a 
double  tressure,  flowered  and  counter-flowered  with  flov/er-de -luces,  and  had  these 
words  round  the  seal,  S.  Alex.  Reg.  Scotorum,  which  I  have  seen  in  the  hands  of 
Sir  Patrick  Kirkpatrick  of  Closeburn,  appended  to  a  charter  of  that  king's  to  one 
of  the  progenitors  of  that  ancient  family. 

i  have  seen  severals  of  the  same  impressions  of  Alexander  TIL  having  the  lion 
within  a  double  tressure,  and  those  of  King  Robert  the  Bruce,  and  his  son  King 
David  II.  with  the  same  imperial  arms,  having  laid  aside  their  former  arms,  viz. 
or,  a  saltier  and  chief  gules :  And  when  King  David  was  succeeded  by  Robert 
Stewart,  w)io,  as  nearest  of  kin  to  the  said  king,  ascended  the  throne,  laid  aside 
his  paternal  coat,  being  or,  a  fesse  cheque,  azure  and  argent,  and  only  used  the 
imperial  seals  of  the  kingdom,  the  lion  rampant  within  the  double  tressure,  as  all 
his  successors  (to  make  a  short  detail)  of  the  princely  family  of  Stewart,  without 
any  alteration,  composition,  or  quartering  with  other  arms,  till  King  James  VI.  of 
that  name  in  Scotland  and  first  in  England,  only  son  of  Prince  Henry  Lord  DarUr 
ly,  and  Mary  Queen  of  Scotland,  only  daughter  and  heir  to  King  James  V.  son 
of  King  James  IV".  and  his  Queen  Margaret,  eldest  daughter  of  King  Henry  VII. 
of  England,  and  his  Queen  Elizabeth,  heiress  and  representative  of  the  house  of 
York. 

King  James  as  only  representer,  and  righteous  heir  of  the  royal  line  of  England,, 
with  an  universal  consent  and  joy  ascended  the  tlirone  of  England,  was  crowned 
with  his  Qiieen  at  Westminster  the  25th  of  July  1603.  Upon  his  accession  to 
the  throne  of  England,  there  were  several  considerations  and  consultatiotis  taken 
by  his  Majesty  and  Privy  Council  of  England,  about  the.  honours  and  precedency 
of  his  kingdoms  of  Scotland  and  England,  and  especially  in  marshalling  their  ar- 
morial ensigns;  the  dilFiculty  arising,  from  the  armorial  figures  of  England,  being 
originally  these  of  the  dukedoms  of  Normandy  and  Aquitaine,  being  three  leopards, 
which,  as  such,  gave  place  to  the  flower-de-luces  of  France,  as  belonging  to  a 
kingdom.  Upon  the  same  reasons  the  Scots  claimed  also  preced':-ncy  for  their 
royal  armorial  figure,  the  hon  rampant  within  a  double  tressure.  the  paternal  arms 
of  the  king,  and  his  progenitors,  used  by  them  before  the  English  used  the  leo- 
pards, and  that  the  paternal  ought  to  precede  the  maternal  ones,  as  I  mentioned 
before,  the  King  of  Castile's  arms  were  preferred  to  thos  j  of  Leon,  the  wife's  arms^ 

The  Scots  being  then  very  jealous,  as  their  predecessors  of  old,  of  their  ancient 
sovereignty,  which  had  cost  them  so  much  blood  and  fatigue,  and  even  of  their 
very  ensigns,  and  shadows  of  them  :  In  the  greatest  straits  and  difficulties  they 
and  their  kingdom  were  in  with  Edward  I.  of  England,  with  whom  it  was  stipu- 
lated, that  their  Queen  Margaret  of  Scotland  should  marry  his  eldest  son  Prince 


too  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  ^c-. 

Edward;  and  it  was  particularly  provided,  that  the  ancient  arms  of  Scotland  should, 
be  kept  entire,  with  all  respect  to  their  honour,  on  the  seals  and  ensigns  of  the 
nation,  and  that  no  other  name  should  be  there  placed  bvit  that  of  the  Queen. 

As  is  said  before,  the  arms  of  Scotland  continued  entire  till  the  union  of  the  two 
kingdoms  in  the  person  of  King  James  VI.  as  in  the  first  Plate,  fig.  i.  After  that 
union  the  Scots  arms  were  preferred  to  the  English,  as  in  all  his  Majesty's  seals,  en- 
signs and  coins ;  tho'  the  English  preferred  England  to  Scotland,  yet  their  seals, 
ensigns,  and  corns,  bear  no  authority  further  than  the  dominion  of  England  ;.  and 
though  the  legend  round  both  seals  was  Ri'x  Magna  Britanniee,  Francia  et  Hi- 
heniiae. 

The  achievement  of  his  Majesty  as  King  of  Scotland,  quarterly,  fi.rst,  or,  a  lion 
rampant  gules,  armed  and  langued  azure,  within  a  double  tressure,  flowered  and 
counter-flowered  with  flower-de-luces  of  the  second,  for  Scotland  ;  second  grand 
quarter,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth,  azure,  three  flower-de-luces  or,  for  France  ; 
second  and  third  gules,  three  leopards  passant  in  pale  or,  for  England ;  third  quar- 
ter, azure,  an  Irish  harp  or,  stringed  argent,  for  Ireland  ;  and  fourth  grand  quar- 
ter as  the  first:  Which  escutcheon  is  surrounded  with  the  ancient  Order  of  the 
Thistle  or  St  Andrew,  and  round  it  with  the  most  noble  Order  of  the  Garter, 
being  blue,  and  embroidered  with  these  words,  Honi  soit  qui  mal  y  pense,  with 
the  badges  of  these  two  orders  hanging  down;  that  of  the  first  named  being  azure, 
representing  St  Andrew,  holding  his  cross  argent;  and  round  the  badge.  Nemo  ins 
impune  lacesset;  and  below  it  the  badge  of  the  garter,  having  St  George  kiUing  the 
dragon  ;  supported  on  the  dexter  by  an  unicorn  argent,  crowned  with  an  imperial, 
and  gorged  with  an  open  crown,  to  this  a  gold  chain  affixed  passing  between  his 
two  legs,  and  i-eflexed  over  his  back  or  ;  and,  on  the  sinister,  by  a  Hon  rampant 
gardant,  and  crowned  also  with  an  imperial  crown  as  the  other  ;  the  first  embra- 
cing, and  bearing  up  a  banner  azure,  charged  with  a  St  Andrew's  cross  argent ;  and 
the  last  another  banner  argent,  charged  with  a  plain  cross  (called  of  St  Gtorge.') gules, 
both  standing  on  a  rich  compartment,  from  the  middle  whereof  issue  a  thistle  and 
rose,  as  the  tv/o  royal  badges  of  Scotland  and  England :  and  for.  his  Majesty's  roy- 
al mottos,  in  an  escrol  above  all.  In  defence,  for  Scotland  ;  and  in  die  table  of  the. 
compartment,  Dieu  et  mon  droit,  for  England,  France,  and  Ireland.. 

The  royal  badges  are  a  thistle  of  gold  crowned  for  Scotland,  a  rose  gules  for  Eng- 
land, a  flower-de-luce  or,  for  France,  an  harp  or,  stringed  argent,  for  Ireland.  Be- 
sides these  there  are  badges  peculiar  to  the  kingdom  of  Scotland  and  England  re- 
presented on  the  banners  in  the  royal  achievement,  and  advanced  in  his  Majesty's 
standard  by  land  and  sea,  viz. 

Azure,  a  cross  of  St  Andrew  argent,  for  Scotland,  St  Andrew  being  patron 
thereof. 

Argent,  a  cross  of  St  George  (or  a  plain  cross)  gules,  for  England,  St  George  be- 
ing patron  thereof.     As  Plate  I.  fig.  2. 

I  shall  here  add  an  account  of  the  Great  Seal  of  his  Majesty  King  James,  who  is. 
represented  sitting  on  his  throne  of  England  in  his  royal  robes,  with  the  great  col- 
lar of  the  Order  of  St  George  about  his  neck,  (being  the  first  of  the  kings  of  Eng- 
land represented  with  the  collar  on  their  seals)  an  imperial  crown  on  his  head, 
with  the  sceptre  in  his  right,  and  the  mond  in  his  left  hand  ;  and,  at  the  right 
side  of  the  throne  is  a  lion  seiant,  holding  a  standard  with  the  arms  of  Cadwalla- 
der,  the  last  king  of  the  Britons,  being  azure,  a  cross  patee  jitche  or,  as  descended 
from  him  ;  on  the  left  side  is  an  unicorn  gorged  with  a  coronet,  and  chained  in 
the  like  posture  as  the  lion,  holding  with  his  left  foot  a  standard  with  the  arms  of 
the  English  Saxon  Kings,  being  azure,  a  cross  fleury  between  four  martlets  or.  These 
ensigns  were  placed  to  show  his  Majesty's  descent  from  the  blood  royal  of  the 
Welsh  and  English. 

Over  the  throne  is  the  royal  escutcheon,  quarterly  ;  first  grand  quarter,  quarter- 
ly, France  and  England  ;  second  Scotland  ;  third  Ireland  ;  and  the  fourth  as  the 
first :  which  escutcheon  is  surrounded  with  the  garter,  and  ensigned  with  an  im- 
perial crown.  King  James  was  the  first  King  of  England  that  brought  into  the 
achievement  the  harp  for  Ireland.  On  the  reverse  of  this  Great  Seal  his  Majesty 
is  represented  on  horseback  in  armour,  holding  in  his  right  hand  a  sword,  and,  on 
bis  left,  a  shield  of  the  above  arms,  and  the  same  on  the  caparisons  of  his  horse, 
I 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  Uc:  roi 

and  below  its  belly  a  greyhound  crjiiriint ;  tlie  legend  round  both  the  sides  of  the  seal, 
'fncobus  Dei  Gratia  An^liiif,  Scotitif,  Frtinciac,  et  Hibcniiiw  Rex  :  the  arms  were 
supported  on  the  rig-ht  side  by  the  English  lion  crowned,  and,  on  the  Ictt,  by  the 
unicorn  of  Scotland. 

Those  arms  of  his  Majesty  on  his  seals,  ensigns,  and  coins,  had  no  authority  in 
Scotland:  no  coins  were  current  there  but  those  that  had  the  arms  of  ScotL-nd 
placed  in  the  first  quarter  before  those  of  France,  England,  and  Ireland,  and  en- 
signed  with  the  imperial  crown  of  Scotland  ;  and  which  arms  still  continued  with 
us,  and  even  in  the  time  of  King  William  Prince  of  Orange  and  Nassau,  on  our 
seals  and  coins,  the  arms  of  Scotland  preceded  those  of  England  and  Ireland;  and, 
to  show  that  he  was  elective  king,  placed  over  the  quartered  arms  of  Great  Britain 
his  paternal  coat  by  way  of  surtout,  azure,  seme  of  billets,  a  lion  rampant  or.  arm- 
ed and  langued  gules,  for  Nassau. 

Since  the  incorporate  union  betwixt  England  and  Scotland  in  the  reign  of  Qiieen 
Anne,  the  arms  of  the  two  nations  have  been  otherwise  marshalled  together,  w  here 
the  lion  of  Scotland  has  lost  his  precedency,  thus  blazoned ;  quarterly,  first,  gules, 
three  leopards  in  pale  or,  for  England  ;  parti  with  or,  a  lion  rampant  giihs,  armed 
and  langued  azure,  within  a  double  tressure,  flowered  and  counter-flowered  with 
flower-de-luces  of  the  second,  for  Scotland  ;  second  quarter,  azure,  three  flower- 
de-luces  or,-  for  France  ;  third,  azure,  an  harp  or,  stringed  urgent;  fourth  quarter 
as  the  first,  all  within  the  garter,  supported  on  the  dexter  with  a  lion  gules,  crown- 
ed with  an  imperial  crown  or,  and,  on  the  sinister,  by  an  unicorn  argent,  horned^ 
maned,  unguled,  and  gorged  with  a  crown,  with  a  chain  thereto  affixed,  reflexing 
over  its  back,  and  betwixt  its  legs  or ;  which  escutcheon  is  timbred  with  a  hel- 
met and  mantlings  suitable  to  his  Majesty,  ensigned  with  an  imperial  crown,  and 
thereupon  for  crest,  a  lion  passant  gardant  gules.,  crowned  or ;  with  the-  motto, 
Semper  eadem. 

1  have  blazoned  the  armorial  figures  of  England  sometimes  leopards,  and  some- 
times Viom  passant  gardant,  according  to  the  English  ;  and  I  have  given  their  dis- 
tinctions in  the  First  Volume  of  this  System,  and  shall  only  here  add  what  the  in- 
genious author  of  the  New  Dictionary  of  Heraldry  says  at  the  title  o(  Leopards. 

According  to  the  French  heralds,  they  differ  in  three  particulars  from  lions :  As, 
first.  That  they  always  show  their  full  face,  whereas  the  lions  show  but  one  side. 
Secondly,  Their  posture  is  never  rampant  like  the  lions,  but  only  passunt  ;  and  if 
ever  leopards  happen  to  be  rampant,  they  arC'  blazoned  leopards  Hone,  because 
they  take  th-e  natural  posture  of  the  lions  in  heraldry  ;  and  so  lions,  when  passant, 
are  blazoned  leopards.  Thirdly,  The  end  or  brush  of  the  leopard's  tail  is  always 
turned  outwards,  and  that  of  lions  ought  to  be  inwards,  though  this  latter  is  not 
nicely  observed.  Leopards  represent  those  brave  and  generous  warriors  who  have 
performed  some  bold  enterprize  with  force,  courage,  promptness,  and  activity. 
English  heralds  do  not  observe  the  differences  above  mentioned  between  lions  and 
leopards,  but  make  them  both  rampant  and  passant  at  pleasure,  and  show  the 
whole  or  the  side  of  either,  expressing  the  full  face  by  the  term  gardant ;  nor  is 
there  any  regard  given  to  the  nicety  of  turning  the  end  or  brush  of  the  tail  inward 
(3r  outward  ;  yet,  as  this  art  was  learnt  of  the  French,  some  notice  might  be  taken 
oi  them  however  the  English  are  gone  from  those  rules. 

Upon  the  Duke  of  Brunswick,  Lunexburgh,  &-c.  his  accession  to  the  crown  of 
Great  Britain,  the  arms  are  again  otherwise  marshalled,  whose  blazon  1  shall  herf 
add  from  the  editor  of  the  last  edition  of  Guillim. 

The  achievement,  or  sovereign  ensign  armorial,  of  the  most  high  and  raighy 
monarch,  George,  by  the  grace  of  God  King  of  Great  Britain,  France,  <ti 
Ireland.  Defender  of  the  Faith,  Prince  Electoral  of  Brunswick  Lunenburg. '^c. 
is  quarterly  thus  : — In  the  first  grand  quarter,  England,  viz.  gules,  three  ViOWp'H- 
sant  gardant  or,  impaling  Scotland,  viz.  or,  a  lion  rampant  within  a  doubl-  tres- 
sure, contre-fleury  gules  ;  the  second  grand  quarter,  France,  viz.  azure,  thr«  flow- 
er-de-luces w;  the  third  Ireland,  viz.  rtz;//r,  aharpov;  and,  in  the  fourth  Bruns- 
wick, that  K  gules,  two  Wons  passant  gardant  or,  impaled  with  Lunenburi;,  viz.  or, 
seme  of  ht&vls  gules,  a  lion  rampant  azure,  having  ancient  Saxony,  that  .'s  j^///«,  an 
horse  salient  argent,  ente  en  pointe,  with  a  scutcheon  in  iwtoM  gules,  o'lnrged  with 
the  imperial  crown  of  Charlemagne,  being  the   proper  badge  of  the  hereditary 

Vol.  II.  C  c 


102  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  i^c. 

treasurer  of  the  sacred  Roman  empire,  all  within  a  garter,  the  ensign  of  that  most 
noble  Order  of  knighthood,  of  which  his  Majesty  is  chief :  above  the  same  a  hel- 
met, answerable  to  his  sovereign  jurisdiction ;  and  thereon  a  mantle  of  cloth  of 
gold  doubled  ermine,  adorned  with  an  imperial  crown  surmounted  on  the  top  for  his 
Majesty's  crest  by  a  lion  passant  gardant  or,  crowned  with  a  like  crown,  proper ; 
sustained  on  the  dexter  side  with  a  lion  imperially  crowned  gules,  as  the  proper 
supporter  of  the  English  ensign ;  and,  on  the  left,  by  an  unicorn  argent,  gorged 
with  a  princely  crown,  from  which  is  a  chain  turned  over  his  back,  and  between 
his  legs  gold  ;  of  which  metal  he  is  also  hoofed,  maned,  and  tufted,  both  stand- 
ing upon  a  compartment  ornamented  with  a  rose  and  thistle,  proper,  being  the 
royal  badges  of  his  Majesty's  chief  kingdoms  of  England  and  Scotland,  and  in- 
scribed (in  a  scroll  within)  with  his  Majesty's  motto  or  device,  viz.  Dieu  et  man 
droit.  Two  unicorns  were  the  supporters  of  the  Scots  kings,  which,  upon  the 
union  under  King  James  L  of  England,  and  VL  of  Scotland,  gave  occasion  for 
carrying  one  of  them  on  the  sinister  side  of  the  achievement  of  England. 

As  to  the  fourth  quarter  of  his  Majesty's  royal  achievement  being  marshalled 
with  three  coats,  after  a  method  not  ordinarily  used  by  the  French  and  Britons. 
It  is  true,  the  Germans  and  Spainards  sometimes  use  that  way  of  ente  en  pointe, 
where  the  horse  of  Saxony  is,  as  in  Plate  L  fig.  5. 

As  to  these  three  coats  of  arms  in  the  last  quarter  in  the  achievement  of  his 
Royal  Majesty,  the  rise  of  the  others  above  being  spoke  to  and  generally  known, 
I  shall  now  speak  briefly  of  them.  These  of  Brunswick  being  gules,  two  leopards 
or,  were  granted  by  Richard  of  England,  to  Henry  Duke  of  Brunswick,  his  cou- 
sin, and  ever  since  have  been  carried  in  that  princely  family  ;  for  which  Hoppin- 
gius  citeth  an  ancient  writer,  Jo.  Bangen  Thuringisch,  who  wrote  anno  1143, 
page  58.  "  Refert  Richardum  Angliae  regem  quinque  aureos  leopardos  insignium 
"  loco  detuHsse,  ac  veniente  ad  eum  affine  suo  Henrico  Brunswicensium  Duce, 
•'  duos  clypeo  leopardos  detraxisse,  illique  donasse."  This  author  has  been  no  good 
herald;  who,  thought  that  Richard  of  England  and  his  predecessors  carried  five 
leopards,  but  took  two  from  five,  and  gave  them  to  his  friend  Henry  Duke  of 
Brunswick  ;  so  that  Richard's  successors  carried  since  three. 

As  for  the  arms  of  Lunenburg,  they  are  older  than  those  of  Brunswick,  being 
argent,  seme  oi  xo^ts  gules,  a  lion  rampant  azure;  as  Hoppingius  blazons  them,  and 
which  the  Emperor  Otto  L  gave  to  this  ancient  family  in  the  year  965,  for  their 
special  service  to  him  in  Italy.  Our  author's  words  are,  "  Henricum  quem  Otto  L 
"  Imp.  an.  Chr.  965,  Burgravum  Magdeburgensem  &-  principem  Lunenburgensem 
"  fecit,  leonis  cerulei  in  campo  albo,  iusigne  tribuit,  interjectis  per  campum  macu- 
"  lis,  sive  rosarum  foliis  donavit :  quae  usque  hue  Lunenburgensis  ducatus  super- 
"  sunt  arma  :"  But  others  say  seme  of  htaxts,  gules,  instead  of  roses. 

As  for  the  third  area  ente  en  pointe,  gules,  a  horse  salient  argent,  for  Saxony,  not 
from  the  Duke's  descent  from  Wittichindus  of  Saxony,  but  for  conquering  a  great 
part  of  that  country,  especially  Westphalia.  Our  author's  words  are,  "  Quo  ad 
"  equum  sive  pullum  non  erat  gestum  ab  Henrico  leone,  tanquam  proveniente  a 
"  prosapia  Wittichindi,  ut  equum  deferret,  sed  quod  maximam  partem  Westphalia;, 
''  cujus  hie  equus  tessera  est,  possidisset." 

The  editor  of  Guillim  gives  us  the  achievement  of  his  Royal  Highness  George 
ince  of  Wales,  &c.  Knight  of  the  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Garter,  being  those 
the  king  viz.  quarterly,  in  the  first  grand  quarter,  England,  i.  e.  gules,  three 
IS  passant  g,:rdant  in  pale  or,  impaling  for  Scotland  or,  a  lion  rampant  within  a 
'St''^)lc  tressure,  ileurv  contre-ileury  gules;  second  grand  quarter  argent,  France, 
^'''^zure,  three  liower-de-luces  or  ;  third  Ireland,  viz.  azure,  an  harp  or,  strung 
arge\^ ;  and,  in  the  fourth,  Brunswick,  viz.  gules,  two  \\o\\%  passant  gardant  in  pale 
\ialmg  Lunenburg,  i.  e.  or,  seme  of  hearts  gules,  a  lion  rampant  azure,  hav- 
ing eht  en  pointe  of  Saxony  Ancient,  viz.  gules,  a  horse  salient  argent,  with  an 
escutch\on  or  svlYco^M  gules,  and,  over  all,  a  label  of  three  points  silver.  His  High- 
ness's  suWjorters  and  crest  the  same  as  his  Majesty's,  save  that  each  are  gorged 
with  a  lati;!  argent,  and  his  crest  with  one,  and  crowned  with  a  prince's  coronet, 
not  an  innYiaT  crown. 

This  autlW-  likewise  gives  us  the-sculpture  of  the  achievement  of  his  Highness 
Prince  Fkede\^ck,  eldest  spn  of  his  Royal  Highness  George  Prince  of  Wales,  &-c. 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  b\-.  103 

Knight  of  the  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Garter,  the  same  arms  with  those  of  his 
father  ;  but  for  liis  difference  in  chief,  a  label  of  three  points  ar^riit,  the  middle 
point  charged  with  a  cross  ^'ules,  (St  George's  cross)  and  the  same  label  on  the  sup- 
porters and  crest. 

Likewise  the  achievement  of  his  Royal  Highness  Ernest  Duke  of  York,  &c. 
Bishop  of  Osnaburg,  and  Knight  of  the  most  noble  Order  of  the  Garter,  which  is 
the  same  with  ins  brother's,  King  of  Great  Britain,  differenced  with  a  label  of  three 
points,  each  charged  with  as  many  hearts  gules ;  the  supporters  and  crest  of  Eng- 
land gorged  with  the  same  label. 

The  achievement  of  her  Highness  the  Princess  Anne,  eldest  daughter  of  his 
Royal  Highness  George  Prince  of  Wales,  is  the  same  with  her  father's,  with  the 
difference  of  a  lambel  in  chief  of  five  points,  each  cliarged  with  a  cross  gules,  and 
the  same  on  the  supporters  of  Great  Britain,  and  all  ensigned  with  a  coronet 
heightened  with  cross  patees  and  flower-de-luces  alternately. 

The  same  achievement  he  gives  to  her  Highness  the' Princess  Amelia  Sophia 
Eleanora,  second  daughter  of  his  Royal  Highness  George  Prince  of  Wales,  &c. 
is  the  same  with  her  sister ;  and,  for  difference,  a  lambel  of  five  points  ermine,  also 
placed  upon  the  supporters,  and  adorned  with  a  coronet  as  before. 

And  the  achievement  of  her  Highness  the  Princess  Elizabeth  Carolina,  third 
daughter  of  his  Royal  Highness  George  Prince  of  Wales,  &c.  the  same  with  her 
sisters,  with  the  difference  of  a  label  of  five  points,  each  charged  with  three  roses, 
as  I  take  them  by  the  sculpture. 

The  arms  of  these  three  princesses  are  all  within  lozenges  ;  but  it  is  not  ordina- 
ry with  the  French,  nor  with  us,  to  ditTerence  younger  daughters  from  one  another. 

It  is  to  be  observed,  that  the  surtout  gules,  charged  with  the  imperial  crown  of 
Charlemagne,  being  the  proper  badge  of  the  hereditary  treasurer,  is  not  used  by 
any  of  the  royal  family,  but  by  his  Majesty,  which  I  have  taken  notice  of  before 
in  the  section  of  the  Marks  of  Offices. 

His  Majesty,  before  he  came  to  the  throne  of  England,  and  to  be  one  of  the 
Electoral  Princes  of  the  Empire,  as  Duke  of  Brunswick,  had  his  arms  otherwise  ; 
as  Jeu  d'Jnnories  des  Soveraigiis  et  Estiits  d'Kurope,  par  C.  Orance  fine,  called 
Dc  Brianville,  par.  155.  "  Le  Due  de  Brunswic  blazon,  porte  escartele  ;  au  i.  de 
"  gueules  a  deux  leopards  d'or,  lampasses  &•  arme's  d'a-zur,  qui  est  de  Brunswic  ; 
"  au  2d,  d'or,  seme  de  coeurs  de  gueules,  au  lion  d'azur,  lampasse'  et  arme'  de 
"  gueules,  qui  est  de  Lunebourg  ;  au  3d,  d'azur,  au  lion  d'  argent,  couronne' 
"  d'or,  lampasse  de  gueules,  qui  est  d'Aberstein  Neugatene  ;  au  4th,  de  gueules 
"  au  lion  d'or,  lampasse'  &-  arme  d'azur,  a  la  bordure  compone  d'argent  & 
"  d'  azur,  qui  est  de  Homburg. 

"  Cimier  un  bonnet  haut  de  gueules,  couronne'  d'or  &  seme'  d'une  queue  de 
"  paon,  traverse  d'un  cheval  gallopant  d'argent,  entre  deux  faucilles  aftronte'es 
"  de  mesme,  emanchees  de  gueules,  virolees  d'or,  bordees  en  dehors  rondeaux  de 
"  queues  de  paon. "     Thus  Englished. 

'The  Duke  of  Brunswick  carried,  quarterly,  first  gules,  tvfo  leopards  or,  langued 
and  armed  azure,  for  Brunswick  ;  second  or,  seme  of  hearts  gules,  a  lion  azure, 
langued  and  armed  gules,  for  Lunenburg;  third  azure,  a  lion  argent,  crowned  or, 
langued  gules,  for  Eberstain  Neugatein  ;  fourth  gules,  a  lion  or,  langued  and  armed 
azure,  within  a  bordure  compone,  argent  and  azure,  for  Homburg. 

The  crest,  or  cemier,  a  high  bonnet,  (called  by  the  Germans  a  spitbood)  adorned 
with  a  crown,  topped  with  a  peacock's  train,  traversed  before  with  a  horse  gallop- 
ing argent,  between  two  sickles  affront e  of  the  \3AX.,emanche  gules,  bordered  on  the 
outsides  with  roundels  of  peacocks'  tails,  proper. 

The  Princes  and  Dukes  of  Brunswick  have  had  their  achievements,  with  many 
more  quarters  of  arms  belonging  to  their  noble  feus,  which  Jacob  Willielmus  Im"- 
hoff  gives  us  in  his  Genealogical  History  of  the  Princes  of  Germany,  which  I  omit,, 
to  shun  the  length  and  confusion  of  armories. 

As  for  the  way  of  marshalling  several  arms  in  one  shield  by  way  of  enti,  i.  e. 
ingrafting,  is  more  frequent  in  other  countries  than  in  Britain,  where  it  never  oc- 
curred to  me  in  arms,  nor  in  any  English  writer,  till  of  late  in  the  two  English  Dic- 
tionaries of  Heraldry,  that  of  the  editor  of  Guillim's,  and  another  since  printed  in 
he  1725,  who  both  write  the  same  thing,  viz.  ente  is  a  French  word,  and  signifies 


104  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS  b^r. 

any  thing  grafted  or  ingrafted;  it  is  used  by  foreign  heralds  to  express  a  method 
of  niarshaUing,  more  frequently  to  be  found  abroad.  I  do  not  remember,  says 
our  author,  that  I  have  met  with  an  instance  of  this  practice  with  us  till  now, 
which  is  the  fourth  grand  quarter  of  his  Majesty's  royal  ensign,  whose  blazon  I 
give  thus  :  Brunswick  and  Lunenburg,  impaled  with  ancient  Saxony,  ente  en 
pointe,  that  is,  grafted  in  point,  or  in  form  of  that  ordinary  :  The  French  call  it 
la  pointe,  which  resembles  in  some  measure  the  lower  part  of  our  parti  per  cheve- 
ron  ;  but  we  have  not  such  an  ordinary  in  our  practice.  Mr  Baron  calls  this  ente 
insitus.     Diet,  to  Guil. 

In  my  Alphabetical  Index,  explaining  the  Terms  of  Heraldry,  mentioned  in  my 
Essay  on  the  Ancient  and  Modern  use  of  Armories,  I  told  that  the  term  ente  or 
^fraftinj^  is  when  arms  are  placed  in  the  triangular  space  between  the  flanks  of 
two  other  coats  of  arms  ;  as  in  the  arms  of  the  dukes  of  Savoy  and  kings  of 
Spain  ;  So  that  this  way  of  marshalling  arms  was  not  known  to  us  and  the  Eng- 
lish, till  his  Majesty  King  George  ascended  the  throne  of  Great  Britain,  and 
caused,  by  way  of  ente,  ingraft  the  galloping  horse  of  Saxony  in  the  base,  in  the 
sovereign  banner  of  Great  Britain  :  And  since  I  am  speaking  of  such  partitions,  I 
shall  here  add  another  section  of  these  Partitions,  whereby  arms  are  accumulate 
together. 


TARTITIONS  FOR  MARSHALLING  OF  ARMS. 

Marshalling  is  a  term,  says  Guillim,  of  great  extent,  not  only  in  ordering  the 
parts  of  an  army,  but  also  in  disposing  of  persons  and  things  in  all  solemnities, 
marriages,  funerals,  creations  of  nobility,  &c.  But  here  it  is  taken,  as  it  concerns 
armories,  for  an  orderly  disposing  of  sundry  coats  of  arms  of  distinct  families  in 
Their  proper  place  in  one  shield. 

The  various  ways  of  acquiring  arms,  and  the  changes  and  occasions  of  them, 
iiave  given  original  to  the  various  positions  and  situations  of  quarters  or  sections, 
fields  or  areas,  in  shields  of  arms. 

The  multiplication  of  ensigns  is  from  the  conjunction  of  many  jurisdictions  and 
territories,  the  rights  and  dispositions  to  which  are  sometimes  conveyed  by  the  will 
of  some  testator,  so  as  it  frequently  falls  out,  that  great  princes,  by  accession  of 
Tiew  dignities,  are  obliged  to  use  new  titles,  and  add  such  ensigns  to  their  own  : 
l'"rom  whence  you  see,  that  the  successors  of  kingdoms,  principalities,  and  earldoms, 
do  annex  and  accumulate  other  arms  to  their  own,  upon  several  accounts;  of 
which  I  have  treated  before  :  But  here  I  shall  speak  only  to  the  Partitions  which 
makes  the  fields  or  areas  in  armories.  I  shall  not  mention  parti  parted  per  pale, 
vmd  coupe  parted  per /esse,  which,  when  joined  together,  give  a  quartered  arms  ;  of 
which  1  have  spoke  fully  before :  but  as  to  other  sections  or  areas,  not  so  generally 
known  with  us  in  marshalled  arms,  I  shall  here  mention  four  ways  in  accumulat- 
ing many  coats  in  one  shield. 

I.  By  tranche  and  taille  lines.  2.  By  surmounting  quartered  coats,  not  only 
with  an  escutcheon,  called  by  the  French  a  stirletout,  but  with  le-tout-du-toiit,  and 
with  other  ordinaries,  as  the  pale,  fesse,  and  cross,  dividing  the  quarters ;  and  again 
surmounted  with  escutcheons.  3.  By  tiercing  and  ingrafting  of  arms,  which  the 
French  call  ente.  And  4.  By  a  division  of  the  shield  into  a  plurality  of  areas  by 
many  parti  and  coupe  lines.  Which  four  ways  I  shall  speak  to  in  order,  and  ex- 
emplify them  by  instances. 

Parted  per  saltier  is  a  quartered  coat  by  two  lines,  dividing  the  shield  from  the 
right  angle  in  chief  to  the  left  in  base,  ct  e  contra  from  the  left  to  the  right  in 
base  diagonally,  into  four  equal  conal  quarters  or  areas ;  which  partition  the  French 
tall  tranche  taille.  Such  a  disposition  of  arms  is  not  ordinary  in  Britain  ;  yet  fre- 
quently in  other  European  countries,  as  the  well  known  arms  of  Sicily,  which  I 
instance,  being  so  marshalled,  viz.  quarterly  per  saltier  ;  first  and  fourth  or,  four 
pallets  gnles.,  for  Arragon  ;  second  and  third  urgent,  an  eagle  displayed  sahle, 
beaked  and  membred  gules,  for  Swabia.  The  French  say  "  D'or,  a  quatre  peaux 
"  de  gueules  fianqu2  d'  argent,  a  I'aigle  de  sable,  becque  &•  raembre  de  gueules." 

2 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  bv.  J05 

The  Latins,  as  Chifiletius,  blazon,  (parted  per  saltier)  "  Scutum  oblique  dextror- 
"  su  11  cs-  sinistroibum  tectum  in  summo  &-  in  imo,  &^c," 

The  second  way  proposed  is  bs  surmounting  quartered  arms  with  inescutcheons, 
by  the  French  called  surtotit.  1  have  given  several  examples  of  those,  in  this  and 
the  former  volume.  When  the  inescucclieou  or  surtout  is  parted,  couped,  or 
quartered,  with  diverse  coats  of  arms,  and  these  again  surmounted  with  another 
inescutcheon,  the  French  call  the  uppermost  le-tout-du-tout :  And  after  this  man- 
ner are  several  coats  of  arms  marshalled  ;  as  in  the  achievement  or  the  Princes  of 
Orange,  in  the  family  of  Nassau  ;  thus  quarterly,  first  azure,  seine  of  billets,  a 
lion  rampant  or,  for  Nassau ;  second  or.  a  lion  rampant  gardant  gules,  crowned 
langued  and  armed  azure,  for  the  country  of  Catzenelbogen  j  third  gules,  a  fesse 
argent,  for  the  house  of  Vianden  ;  fourth  gules,  two  leopards  or,  langued  and 
armed  azure,  for  the  country  of  Dietz  :  and  over  all  an  inescutcheon  by  way  01" 
surtout;  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  gules,  a  bend  or,  for  Challons  ;  second  and 
third  or,  a  hunting-horn  azure,  virole  and  stringed  gules,  for  the  principality  of 
Orange  ;  which  inescutcheon  is  again  surmounted  of  another  by  way  of  le-tvut-du- 
tout,  cheque  or  and  azure  of  nine  points,  as  a  coat  of  pretension  to  the  city  of  Ge- 
neva. 

Next,  as  to  the  Ordinaries,  viz.  the  pale,  fesse,  and  cross,,  their  usage,  as  a  me- 
thod in  marshalHng  of  arms,  by  dividing  the  quarters  in  the  shield,  I  shall  illustrate 
as  follows. 

And  first,  As  to  the  ordinaiy  of  the  pale,  being  a  distinguishing  method  for 
marshalling  arms,  I  have  not  met  with  any  examples  used  by  us  in  Britain,  though 
this  way  of  marshalling  is  frequently  used  abroad  by  foreign  heralds.  An  example 
whereof  we  have  in  the  armorial  bearing  of  the  Dukes  of  Parma  and  Placenza ; 
the  blazon  whereof  is  thus,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  o/-,  six  flower-de-luces  azure-, 
3,  2,  and  I,  for  Faranese  ;  second  and  X^axxAgiiks,  a  fesse  argent,  for  Austria  Mo- 
dern, impaled  (the  French  say  parti)  with  bendy  of  six,  or  and  azure,  within  a 
bordure  gules,  for  Burgundy  Ancient.  And  dividing  the  quarters,  a  pale  gules, 
charged  with  a  papal  gonfanoun,  surmounted  with  two  keys,  the  one  or  and  the 
other  argent,  as  a  badge  of  the  oi&e  of  the  High  Gonfalonier  of  the  Church,  and 
over  all  an  inescutcheon  by  way  of  surtout,  the  arms  of  Portugal,  viz.  argent,  five 
inescutheons  placed  cross-ways  azure,  each  charged  with  five  besants  argent, 
placed  in  saltier,  and  marked  with  a  point  sable,  all  within  a  hovdme. gules,  charged 
with  seven  castles  or,  three  in  chief,  two  in  flanks,  and  as  many  towards  the  base 
point. 

As  for  the  historical  part  of  this  blazon  I  shall  give  it  in  short  thus.  The  terri- 
tories of  Parma  and  Placenza  were  long  in  the  possession  of  the  church  till  the 
pontificate  of  Paul  IIL  of  the  family  of  Faranese,  who  made  his  nephew  Peter  Fa- 
ranese, Duke  of  these  territories,  in  the  year  1545.  But  his  successor  Octavio,  se- 
cond duke,  being  much  disquieted  in  the  possession  by  the  Emperor  Charles  V. 
he  was  forced  to  marry  Margaret,  a  natural  daughter  of  the  emperor,  who  esta- 
blished him  in  the  sovereignty  of  the  dukedom  of  Parma  ;  and  upon  that  account 
the  dukes  of  that  faniily  quarter  the  arms  of  Austria  and  Burgundy.  And  again, 
Duke  Octavio's  son  and  heir,  by  marrying  Mary,  daughter  of  Edward,  son  of  Em- 
manuel King  of  Portugal,  placed  the  arms  of  that  kingdom,  by  way  oi  surtout,  as 
arms  of  alliance  and  pretension. 

In  my  Essay  on  the  Ancient  and  Modern  Use  of  Armories,  page  ir^,,  I 
have  given  another  example  of  the  bearing  of  this  ordinary,  viz.  the  pale,  as  a 
method  for  dividing  the  quarters  of  arms  in  the  shield,  in  the  arms  of  the  Dukes 
of  Modena  ;  to  which  I  refer  my  reader,  where  will  be  found  the  blazon  and  figure 
of  the  said  coat  cut  in  copper. 

Secondly,  As  to  the  ordhiary  of  ihe  fesse,  in  marshalling  arms  by  dividing  the 
quarters,  we  hav  e  an  example  in  the  arms  of  the  Princes  of  Mirandula  in  Italy, 
who  have  their  qu-artered  arms  divided  by  a  fesse,  and  it  again  surmounted  with 
an  escutcheon  thus ;  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  or,  an  eagle  displayed  sable, 
crowned,  becked,  and  membred  of  the  field;  second  and  third  harry  of  six  pieces 
argent  and  azure,  surmounted  of  a  lion  gules,  armed,  langued,  and  crowned  or,  for 
concord;  and,  dividing  these  quarters,  a  i&az  gules,  surmounted  of  an  escutcheon, 
charged  with  the  arms  of  the  family  of  Pico,  being  cheque,  argent  and  azure ;  and 

Vol.  II.  D  d 


io6  Of  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  cif . 

all  these  again  ensigned  with  a  chief  of  the  empire,  to  wit,  or,  a  double  eagle  dis- 
played sable,  crowned  or,  as  arms  of  patronage  of  the  empire.  See  these  arms 
also  cut  on  copperplate  in  my  said  Essay. 

And  thirdly,  As  to  the  ordinary  of  the  cross,  in  marshalling  arms,  as  a  method  of 
dividing  the  quarters  in  the  shield,  we  need  not  go  abroad  to  seek  examples,  but 
have  instances  hereof  at  home,  particularly  as  used  by  the  Earls  of  Caithness  of 
the  name  of  Sinclair  ;  the  blazon  of  whose  armorial  bearing  is,  quarterly,  first 
azure,  a  ship  at  anchor,  her  oars  erect  in  saltier,  within  a  double  tressure,  counter- 
flowered  or,  for  the  earldom  of  Orkney  ;  second  and  third  or,  a  lion  rampant  ^z^/d-j-, 
for  the  name  of  Spar  ;  fourth  azure,  a  ship  under  sail,  for  the  title  of  Caithness  ; 
and  over  all,  dividing  the  coats,  a  cross  ingrailed  sable,  for  the  surname  of  Sinclair. 
And  it  is  observable  that  several  noble  feus  with  us  that  lay  near  the  sea,  carried 
always  in  their  arms  ships  or  lymphads.  Also  several  families  of  the  name  of 
Sinclair,  as  descendants  from  the  said  earls  of  Caithness,  divided  their  quartered 
arms  by  this  ordinary  of  the  cross,  such  as  the  Sinclairs  of  Dunbeath,  Brims,  &c. 
but  use  suitable  bordures  for  differences. 

There  is  another  example  of  this  method  of  bearing  in  the  arms  of  Ogilvie  of 
Boyne,  who  makes  the  cross  ingrailed  of  Sinclair  divide  his  quartered  coat  thus; 
first  and  fourth  argent,  a  lion  passant  gardant  gules,  crowned  or,  for  Ogilvie  ;  se- 
cond and  third  argent,  three  crescents  gules,  for  Edmonstone ;  over  all,  dividing 
the  quarters,  (the  arms  of  Sinclair)  a  cross  ingrailed  sable.  Which  method  of 
marshalling  his  arms  he  assumes,  as  being  a  younger  son  of  Ogilvie  of  Findlater, 
who  quarters  the  arms  of  Sinclair  with  his  own  paternal  bearing,  on  occasion  of 
Sir  Walter  Ogilvie  of  Auchleven  his  marrying,  in  the  year  1437,  Margaret,  only 
daughter  and  sole  heir  of  John  Sinclair,  possessor  of  the  barony  of  Deskford  in 
Banffshire. 

The  third  way  of  multiplying  many  coats  of  arms  in  one  shield,  laid  down,  is 
by  tiercing  and  ingrafting,  which  the  French  call  e7ite,  a  word  which  signifies  any 
thing  grafted  or  ingrafted.  And  the  author  of  the  New  Dictionary  of  Heraldry, 
Svo,  London,  1725,  tells  us,  "  That  the  word  ante  or  ente,  denotes  that  the 
"  pieces  are  let  into  one  another,  in  such  form  or  manner  as  is  there  expressed. 
"  As,  for  instance,  by  dove-tails,  rounds,  swallow-tails,  or  the  like,  and  is  a  term 
"  used  by  heralds  when  arms  are  placed  in  the  triangular  space  between  the 
"  flanks  of  two  other  coats  of  arms,  to  express  a  method  of  marshalling  more  fre- 
'•  quently  to  be  found  abroad  in  the  books  of  the  armorial  bearings  and  blazons  of 
"  foreign  heralds,"  where  several  examples  of  this  nature  might  be  adduced  ;  parti- 
cularly this  method  is  used  by  the  kings  of  Spain,  dukes  of  Burgundy  and  Savoy, 
the  counts  of  Flanders,  and  a  great  many  more  families  of  distinction,  as  I  have 
made  evident  by  sundry  examples,  to  be  found  in  my  foresaid  Essay  on  the  An- 
cient and  Modern  Use  of  Armories,  from  page  216  to  page  220,  to  which  I  refer 
niy  reader.  I  do  not  remember  that  I  have  met  with  one  instance  of  this  practice 
wirh  us  till  now,  which  is  the  fourth  grand  quarter  of  his  Majesty  King  George 
his  royal  ensign,  who  beareth  quarterly,  first  the  royal  arms  of  England  impaled 
with  those  of  Scotland  ;  second  the  royal  arms  of  France  ;  third  those  of  Ireland  ; 
^nd  the  fourth  grand  quarter  thus,  viz.  first  the  arms  of  Brunswick  gules,  two  lions 
passant  gardant  or,  impaled  with  those  of  Lunenburg,  viz.  or,  seme  of  hearts  ^u/fj-, 
a  lion  rampant  azure,  armed  and  langued  as  the  hearts,  and  grafted  by  way  of 
ente  between  the  im.paling  in  point  the  arms  of  lower  or  ancient  Saxony,  being 
;(ules,  a  horse  courant  argent ;  and  over  all  this  fourth  grand  quarter,  by  way  of 
surtout,  a  shield  gules,  charged  with  the  crown  of  Charlemagne.  Or  the  said 
quarter  may  admit  of  this  blazon,  the  arms  of  Brunswick  and  Lunenburg,  im- 
paled with  ancient  Saxony  ente  en  pointe,  that  is,  grafted  in  point,  or  in  form  of 
that  ordinary.  The  French  call  it  la  pointe,  whicli  resembles  in  some  measure  the 
lo\','er  part  oi  o\xr  parti  per  cbeveron. 

The  fourth  and  last  method  proposed  for  marsliuliing  of  arms  is  by  dividing  of 
the  shield  into  a  plurality  of  areas  or  quarters,  by  many  parti  and  coupe  lines, 
which,  when  drawn,  appear  like  the  areas  of  a  chequer,  divided  by  liorizontal  and 
perpendicular  lines.  By  this  method  of  marshalling,  as  many  coats  as  shall  be 
thought  fit  may  be  taken  in.  But,  in  my  opinion,  if  coats  of  arms  shall  be  thus 
marshalled  by  the  bearers,  merely  on  account  of  descent  from  families  by  the  mo- 


OF  iNIARSHALLING  ARMS,  fi.-.  loi 

ther's  side,  though  they  were  neither  lieiresses  nor  representiitivcs  of  the  families 
they  are  come  of,  such  shields  thus  charged  with  so  lu.iny  coats  of  arms  can  be 
called  nothing  but  s.  ^crifalogicul peniwn ,  and  cannot  be  loLiked  upon  as  proper  <m- 
formal  armorial  bearings. 

In  perusing  several  books  of  heraldry  1  lind  that  it  is  agreed  by  the  best  au- 
thors, that  the  number  of  marshalled  arms  in  one  -si  ield  should  not  exceed  six  or 
eight  quarters  at  most,  and  these  always  charged  upon  "Ue  vvarrantaOle  grounds  and 
reasons  of  the  bearers  having  many  territories  and  feus,  or  matching  with  heiresses, 
or  as  coats  of  alliance  and  pretension.  The  Germans,  it  is  true,  are  in  use  to  liave 
twenty  or  thirty  ditiercnt  coats  accumulate  in  one  shield,  as  the  curious  will  lind 
in  Jacob  Will.  Imhoif's  Blazons  of  the  Achievements  of  the  Princes  of  the  Em- 
pire ;  but  this  is  always  on  the  foresaid  account  of  their  many  territories  and  feus, 
to  show  how  many  votes  they  have  in  the  circles  of  the  empire,  and  so  display  the 
arms  of  these  feus  with  their  other  arms.  Besides,  that  they  have  another  mate- 
rial reason  for  this  practice,  in  respect  that  the  younger  sons,  by  their  custom, 
share  with  the  eldest  in  the  dignity  and  titles  of  honour  of  the  fiunily ;  on  which 
account  there  is  ground  for  an  accumulation  of  arms. 

The  French  indeed  come  not  up  with  the  Germans  In  having  so  many  coats  of 
arms  marshalled  in  one  shield,  their  feus  not  being  so  many,  nor  so  free,  and  the 
succession  of  these  dignities  belonging  always  to  the  eldest  son  or  heir ;  yet  some 
will  have  a  plurality  of  them  marshalled  with  their  own  iirnis,  but  then  always, 
for  good  reasons,  and  never  exceeding  the  regular  method  of  eight  areas  at  most : 
But  we  in  Scotland  have  not  as  yet  come  into  this  method  of  marshalling  our  ar- 
morial bearings  by  many  parti  and  coupe  hues,  though  we  had  an  example  thereof 
brought  into  Scotland  by  Mary  of  Lorrafn,  (Daughter  of  Claud  Duke  of  Guise, 
and  son  of  the  Duke  of  Lorrain)  who  mai-ried  James  V.  King  of  Scotland,  and 
was  mother  of  Mary  Queen  thereof,  whose  armorial  bearing  was  the  arms  of  Lor- 
rain impaled  with  the  arms  of  Scotland,  which  are  yet  to  be  seen  on  several  re- 
markable places  in  the  kingdom,  and  particularly  to  be  met  with  excellently  em- 
bossed and  illuminate  on  a  hall  in  the  house  of  Seaton,  the  blazon  whereof  is  coupe 
one,  parti  three,  making  up  eight  areas ;  though  some  blazon  thus,  saying  four 
coats  in  chief,  and  as  many  in  base.  But  that  way  does  not  rightly  show  how 
these  coats  are  disposed;  and,  therefore,  others  say  more  distinctly,  coupe  one, 
parti  three  ;  first  the  arms  of  Hungary  ;  second  that  of  Naples  ;  third  that  of  Je- 
rusalem ;  and  fourth  the  arms  of  Arragon.  These  four  sovereign  bearings,  as  coats 
of  alliance  and  pretension,  are  placed  in  the  upper  part  of  the  shield  above  other 
four  of  lesser  dignity,  viz.  fifth  the  arms  of  Anjou;  sixth  that  of  Guelders;  seventh 
that  of  Juliers,  and  in  the  eighth  area  the  arms  of  the  county  of  Bar,  and,  over 
all,  by  way  of  surtout,  the  arms  of  the  dukedom  of  Lorrain,  all  which  are  impal- 
ed with  these  of  Scotland,  and  the  full  blazon  of  the  several  coats  therein  contain- 
ed is  to  be  found  in  my  said  Essay  on  the  Ancient  and  Modern  Use  of  Armories, 
where  other  examples  of  blazons  and  figures  on  this  head  are  set  down  and  nar- 
rated. 

Again,  after  King  James  VL  his  accession  to  the  crown  of  England,  he  having 
lionoured  some  favourite  Englishmen  with  titles  of  dignity  in  Scotland,  they  in- 
troduced the  English  custom  into  this  kingdom  of  marshalling  their  arms  by  many 
parti  and  coupe  lines,  far  exceeding  the  regular  method  laid  down  by  the  best 
heralds.  As  in  Mr  Font's  Manuscript  of  the  Blazons  of  the  armorial  bearings  of 
the  nobility  of  Scotland,  where  Sir  Henry  Carey,  one  of  these  English  gentlemen 
advanced  to  be  Viscount  of  Falkland  in  Scotland,  has  his  shield  of  arms  divided 
by  four  coupe  and  six  parti  lines,  which  make  thuty-four  different  areas,  filled  up 
with  as  many  ditferent  coats. 

The  blazon  of  which  armorial  bearing,  as  narrated  by  the  said  author,  is  as  fol- 
lows :  He  bears  (says  he)  thirty -four  coats,  viz.  first  and  last,  argent,  on  a  bend 
sable,  three  roses  of  the  first,  by  the  name  of  Carey,  being  his  paternal  coat.  2.  Or, 
three  piles  in  point  meeting  in  base  azure.  3.  Gules,  a  fesse  betwixt  three  cres- 
cents argent.  4.  Azure,  a  cheveron  argent  between  three  gauntlets  or.  5.  Sable, 
two  bars  wavy  ermine.  6.  Azure  and  gules,  quarterly,  within  a  bordure  gobonat- 
ed  argent  and  azure.  7.  Azure,  a  lion  rampant  argent.  8.  Gules,  three  iions  pas- 
sant or,  within  a  border  argent.     9.  Or,  two  bars  gules  in  chief,  three  torteauxes. 

2 


138  OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  Si.^ 

10.  Barry  of  six,  or  and  azure,  surmounted  of  a  bend  gules,  ii.  Gules,  two  bends 
wavy  or.  12.  Barry  of  ten,  argent  ^nd  gules.  13.  Gules,  a  fesse  or.  14.  Parted 
pei  pale,  or  and  gules,  three  torteauxes  interchanged  of  the  one  and  the  other. 
15.  jrirgent,  two  h^in  gules.  16.  Fretty  bend-ways,  or  and  azure,  withm  abordurc 
gules.  17.  Cheque,  or  and  aziire,  surmounted  of  a  cheveron  ermine.  18.  Or,  tWLx 
bars  ^i/Zd"/.  19.  Quarterly,  or  'znd  gules,  within  a  bordure,  ingrailed  and  gobonated, 
argent  and  azure.  20.  Or,  a  cross  .fr/z/^j-,  difl'erenced  with  a  label  of  three  pendants 
in  chiti  azure.  21.  Parted  per  pale,  or  and  argent,  a  lion  rampant  ^a/fj-.  22.  Or, 
six  lions  rampant  sable.  23.  Sable,  three  garbs  argent.  24.  .Argent,  a  manchc 
f«/«.  25.  Argent,  a  chief  ^a/fj.  26.  Ga/fj-,  a  cheveron  argent.  27.  Or,  a  bar 
between  two  cheverons  sable.  28.  A  lion  passant  gardant,  crowned  or.  29.  Argent, 
three  eagles' wings  displayed  ^«/^j-.  30.  Cr,  three  bars  ^«/f  j.  31.  Argent,  two 
lionels  passant  azure,  crowned  or,  armed  j>-tt/ifx.  32.  Argent,  a  cheveron  ^z/Zfj-. 
33.  Argent,  two  bars,  and  a  canton  azure.     34.  And  last  coat  is  as  the  first. 

As  also  Henry,  Lord  Constable  of  Halsham  in  Holderness,  (York  E.  R.)  an- 
other of  these  English  gentlemen  who  was,  by  letters  patent  of  the  said  King 
James,  raised  to  the  peerage  of  Viscount  of  Dunbar  in  Scotland,  divides  the  arms 
on  his  shield  into  coupe  two,  parti  four,  which  makes  fifteen  areas  of  different 
bearings. 

The  blazon  of  whose  armorial  bearing,  as  in  Mr  Pont's  said  Manuscript,  is  thus: 
The  said  Viscount  of  Dunbar,  says  he,  beareth  fifteen  coats  marshalled  in  one 
shield,  viz.  i.  Barry  of  six,  or  and  azure,  his  paternal  coat  for  constable.  2.  Argent, 
three  garlands  gules.  3.  Crussalla  of  cinquefoils  or,  surmounted  of  a  bend,  in- 
grailed argent,  by  the  name  of  Umfraville,  sometime  Earl  of  Angus.  4.  Gules, 
a  cheveron  or,  by  the  name  of  Kym,  Lord  of  Kym.  5.  Quarterly,  or  and  gules, 
on  a  bend  sable  three  e'scalops  argent,  for  the  name  of  Onarass.  6.  Barry  of  six, 
vr  and  azure,  on  a  canton  gules,  a  cross  fleury  argent.  7.  Or,  a  cross  sable.  8. 
Gules,  a  saltier  argent,  with  a  mullet  sable,  for  difference,  for  the  name  of  Newell. 
9.  Or,  fretty  gules,  on  a  canton  parted  per  pale,  ermine  and  or,  the  oars  of  a  ship 
in  cross  sable.  10.  Gules,  a  lion  salient  or.  ii.  Or,  a  chiei  dancette  azure,  for  the 
name  of  Glamnyll.  12.  Azure,  three  crescents,  and  nine  cross  croslets  argent, 
for  the  name  Glanell  of  Conerhame.  13.  Qiiarterly,  or  and  gules,  surmounted  of 
■d  bend  sable.  14.  Sable,  a  bar  between  two  garbs  argent.  The  15.  and  last, 
azure,  a  cross  fleury  or. 

But  as  for  Sir  Richard  Graham  of  Netherby  in  Cumberland,  baronet,  who  was 
descended  from  the  Earls  of  Monteith  in  Scotland,  another  of  these  gentlemen  ad- 
vanced to  the  Scotish  Peerage  by  the  said  Kmg  James,  by  the  title  of  Lord  Viscount 
of  Preston,  though  he  divides  the  shield  of  his  arms  by  parti  and  eoupe  lines,  yet 
does  not  exceed  in  areas  the  regular  number  above  mentioned  ;  for  he  only  mar- 
shals his  arms  by  coupe  one,  parti  two,  which  makes  but  six  areas,  the  first  two 
being  filled  up  with  the  arms  of  Graham,  Earls  of  Monteith,  and  the  rest  with 
four  other  coats,  which  I  presume  his  Lordship  can  very  well  account  for.  The 
blazon  and  figures  of  whose  achievement  will  be  found  in  Mr  Guillim's  Display  of 
Heraldry. 

This  way  of  marshalling  arms  by  many  coupe  and  parti  lines  in  England,  first 
began  in  the  reign  of  King  Edward  IV.  and  has  been  much  affected  and  followed 
by  the  English  since.  But  though  the  above  Queen  Mary  of  Lorrain,  and  the 
foresaid  English  gentlemen,  advanced  by  King  James  to  be  peers  of  this  realm, 
give  us  examples  of  such  bearings,  yet  I  do  not  find  that  any  of  our  Scots  nobility 
or  gentry  have  been  fond  to  practise  this  method.  And  though  the  Germans, 
French,  and  many  sovereign  monarchs  and  princes  abroad  may  have  just  grounds, 
for  the  reasons  above  rehearsed,  to  accumulate  various  coats  of  arms  in  one  shield 
by  a  plurality  of  areas  made  up  by  many  parti  and  coupe  lines,  yet  the  English 
heralds  are  to  blame  in  so  far  degenerating  from  the  regular  rules  of  heraldry  (laid 
down  by  the  most  intelligent  heralds)  in  composing  and  marshalling  arms  by  so 
many  parti  and  coupe  lines,  which,  when  drawn,  make  up  an  unaccountable  plu- 
rality of  areas,  and  filling  them  up  with  such  different  arms  as  they  are  not  able  to 
give  a  just  reason  for.  And  the  English  have  given  us  many  such  examples,  which 
in  my  opinion,  as  1  said  before,  are  no  more  but  genealogical  pennons  of  families 
in  England;  particularly,  Richard  Blome  has  followed  this  method  of  marshaUing 


OF  MARSHALLING  ARMS,  IJc.  109, 

arms,  in  a  great  number  of  examples  that  he  gives  us  in  his  Treatise  of  Honour, 
Military  and  Civil,  added  to  Mr  Guillini's  Display  of  Heraldry,  some  of  which  are 
but  a  heap  of  maternal  descents,  who  have  no  right  to  carry  the  arms  of  these  fa- 
milies, ot  which  their  mothers  and-grandmothers  were  neither  heiresses  nor  repre- 
sentatives, and  so  cannot  regularly  or  justly  be  marshalled,  and  transmitted  to  pos- 
terity as  formal  arms,  but  are  and  will  be  looked  upon  by  all  judicious  heralds, 
and  others  known  in  the  science,  as  a  piece  of  maternal  genealogy.  Columbiere 
tells  us,  "  That  thirty-two  areas  is  the  greatest  number  used  in  France  ;  bu;  tiie 
"  English  and  Germans  (says  he)  sometimes  extend  to  forty  :"  as  a  tesimony  of 
the  truth  whereof,  he  says,  "  He  saw  the  escutcheon  of  the  Earl  of  Leicester,  am- 
"  bassador  extraordinary  to  France,  in  the  year  1639,  and  1640,  divided  into  that 
"  of  forty  ;  and  some,  he  affirms,  do  go  on  to  sixty-four  several  coats."  But  that 
such  a  multitude  rather  make  a  confusion,  than  adds  any  beauty  to  the  escutcheon. 
And  though  this  method  has  been  practised  by  many  of  the  English  nation,  yet 
they  have  had  many  learned  and  judicious  lieralds  among  them  who  ridicule  such 
practices  ;  paiticularly,  Sir  William  Dugdale,  in  his  Ancient  Usage  of  bearing 
arms,  is  of  the  same  opinion  with  me,  and  much  blames  the  quarteriiig  of  many 
marks,  as  he  calls  them,  in  one  coat,  shield,  or  banner  ;  "  Because,  (says  he)  those 
"  marks  being  designed  for  commanders  in  leading  their  armies,  and  to  be  known 
"  by,  they  ought  to  be  apparent,  plain,  and  easy  to  be  discerned  ;  so  that  the 
"  quartering  of  many  together  hinders  the  use  for  which  they  were  designed  ;  for 
"  no  man  can  distinguish  them  at  any  distance,  and  ignorant  persons  can  make 
"  little  of  them  near  at  hand."  And,  to  confirm  his  assertion,  he  produces  in- 
stances of  fatal  consequences  that  have  happened  by  mistakes  in  not  discerning  the 
coat-armour. 

The  first  beginning  of  this  practice  in  England  was,  as  I  said  before,  in  the 
reign  of  King  Edward  IV.  who  fell  in  love  with  Elizabeth  Widville,  daughter  to 
Sir  Richard  Widville,  and  widow  of  Sir  John  Grey  of  Groby,  whom  he  married. 
And,  to  aggrandise  and  qualify  her  for  the  royal  ensign  and  bed,  she  was  allowed 
to  marshal  the  arms  of  her  maternal  descent,  being  more  noble  than  her  paternal, 
hy  coupe  ons,  parti  two,  making  six  areas,  which  is  more  regular  by  far  tlian  the  ir- 
regular plurality  of  areas  the  Enghsh  now  aff'ect.  Mr  Sandford,  in  his  Genealogi- 
cal History  of  the  Kings  of  England,  hatli,  in  page  285  of  the  said  book,  given  the 
blazon  of  the  arms  of  the  said  Q^ieen  Elizabeth,  which  they  that  are  curious  will 
there  find. 

i\nd  now  having  gone  through  and  treated  fully,  and  I  hope  satisfyingly,  of  all 
the  various  methods  of  composing  and  marshalling  arms  of  the  internal  parts  of  ar- 
mories contained  within  the  shield,  and  the  manner  of  forming  regular  arms  there- 
in, I  shall  next  proceed  to  speak  to  these  figures  which  adorn  the  outer  parts,  com- 
monly called  the  exterior  ornaments  of  the  shield,  with  the  several  positions  and 
additional  trinvmings  thereof 


Vol.  II.  E  e 


Vojr  Pi^'i'-y /'■<-' 


PAHTIV.   Oj-tke^vteriirrOr?2amentiioftheShzeld. 


'^^^^'^^^>»^^>5^^^,-^^^^,^,^^^^^ 


SYSTEM 


OF 


HERALDRY. 


SPECULATIVE  AND  PRACTICAL: 


WITH  THE  TRUE  ART  OF  BLAZON. 


PART   FOURTH. 


CHAP.     I. 

CONCERNING  THE  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS  OF  THE  SHIELD,  WITH  SEVERAL  ADDITIONAL 
TRIMMINGS. 

HAVING  treated  fully  of  the  inner  pieces  or  figures  of  armories  contained 
within  the  shield,  I  proceed  to  those  which  adorn  the  outer  parts  of  the  ar- 
morial shield,  commonly  called  the  exterior  ornaments;  such  as  helmets,  mantlings, 
wreaths,  crowns,  crests,  mottos,  supporters,  compartments,  and  other  marks  of  dig- 
nities and  offices,  which  are  placed  above,  at  the  sides,  below,  and  round  the  shield 
or  escutcheon ;  which  so  trimmed  make  a  complete  armorial  achievement.  Be- 
fore I  treat  of  these  figures  separately,  I  shall  speak  a  Httle  to  their  rise  and  use  in 
general. 

The  shield  being  preferred  by  the  ancients  to  other  military  instruments,  not 
only  for  its  then  dignity  and  sign  of  nobility,  and  necessary  use  to  cover  a  man's 
body  in  battle,  but  for  the  conveniency  of  its  form  to  receive  military  marks  and 
devices,  which  came  at  last  to  be  the  fixed  hereditary  marks  of  nobility  placed 
within  the  shield,  after  the  devised  imaginary  parts  of  a  man;  as  in  chief,  collar, 
coeur,  and  Jlangue  points,  that  is,  the  head,  the  neck,  the  heart,  nombrial,  or  navel, 
and  the  thighs,  or  base  points,  which  seem  to  relate  to  those  parts  of  a  man.  And 
that  the  armorial  shield  might  resemble  a  man  the  more,  it  is  thought  by  some, 
that  the  custom  of  trimming  it  with  crown,  helmet,  crest,  and  other  marks  of  dig- 


2  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

nities,  was  in  imitation  of  the  dress  of  the  ancient  heroes  in  time  of  war;  and 
also  after  the  fashion  of  the  Roman  images  or  statues,  in  place  of  which  came 
arms  as  ensigns  of  nobility ;  of  which  1  have  spoke  before  in  the  First  Part  of  this 
System. 

Others  again  bring  the  rise  of  those  exterior  ornaments  from  the  habit  and 
dress  of  mihtary  men  in  public  military  exercises,  such  as  tournaments'  and  joust- 
ings.  Which  opinion  seems  most  reasonable;  for  none  were  admitted  into  those 
exercises  but  such  as  were  truly  noble,  and  had  arms  as  tesserae  of  their  descent, 
which  they  adorned  with  exterior  ornaments,  to  hold  forth  their  present  condi- 
tion and  dignity,  and  which  behoved,  at  their  military  exercise,  to  be  exposed 
to  public  view  before  the  time  of  jousting,  that  by  those  their  owners  might  be 
known. 

Of  the  lav/s  and  forms  of  tournaments  and  joustings  in  several  countries  I  spoke 
before,  and  shall  only  here  add  two  laws  anciently  used  by  our  neighbour  nation, 
from  a  manuscript  (in  our  Lawyers'  Library)  written  by  one  John  Caxton  an 
Englishman,  which  he  recommends  to  the  reading  of  his  king,  Richard,  and  to  the 
knights  of  Scotland,  viz.  "  The  victor  may  go  out  of  the  barriers  of  tournaments 
"  and  joustings  with  his  basnet,  (/.  e.  helmet)  or  he  may  have  it  placed  on  his 
"  shield,  or  carried  before  him  with  his  cognizance,  motto,  or  cry  of  war.  Item, 
"  No  man  should  wear  his,  cognizance  or  tynal  {i.  e.  crest)  upon  a  close  basnet, 
"  (?'.  e.  helmet)  but  he  that  has  carried  arms  within  the  lists  and  barriers  of  mili- 
"  tary  exercises;  and  all  other  nobles  should  bear  their  tynal  of  their  arms  above 
"  an  heaum,  (/.  e.  helmet)  to  show  they  had  been  at  such  exercises." 

As  arms  appear  to  have  risen  from  military  virtue,  and  came  not  in  a  sudden 
to  their  present  perfection  and  beauty  we  now  find  them  in,  but  by  a  long  time 
gradually,  and  were  of  great  esteem  of  old,  being  the  reward  of  heroic  action ;  so 
they  were  also  desired  and  obtained  by  others  (not  of  the  military  employment) 
who  justly  thought  they  merited  no  less  from  their  sovereigns,  by  services  they 
performed  in  their  civil  than  others  in  their  military  capacity,  and  so  adorned  their 
shields  of  arms  with  coronets,  consular  capes,  battons,  and  Ciher  such  like  signs  of 
dignified  offices;  as  did  also  the  ecclesiastics  with  mitres,  hats,  crosiers,  keys,  and 
inher  ecclesiastical  marks;  of  which  afterwards. 

In  later  times  the  men  opulent  of  the  vulgar,  through  ambition,  began  to  place 
their  marks  in  formal  shields,  which  was  not  allowed  to  them  of  old,  but  in  car- 
touches, ?.  f.  false  shields;  which  presumption  occasioned  those  that  were  truly 
noble  by  descent  and  military  virtue,  to  be  more  diligent  to  distinguish  themselves 
from  the  vulgar  by  timbring  their  shields  of  arms  with  the  most  eminent  marks 
of  their  several  degrees  of  nobility,  which  was  not  then  presumed  to  by  the 
ignoble. 

Charles  de  Grassalio,  in  his  Treatise  of  the  Regaha  of  France,  gives  the  name 
timbre  to  all  those  marks  of  dignity  and  offices,  whether  military,  civil,  or  ecclesias- 
tic, when  placed  upon  the  top  of  the  shield;  and  which  word  is  used  also  by  the  best 
of  heralds.  John  Baptista  Christyn,  Chancellor  of  Brabant,  in  his  Jurisprudentia 
Heroica,  says  the  same.  His  words  are,  "  Timbrum  enim  generali  voce  dicitur, 
"  id  omne  qua;  armis  apponitur,  aut  ad  significandum  officii  dignitatem,  aut  orna- 
"  menti  gratia."  The  crown,  helmet,  mantlings,  wreath,  crest,  and  other  devices, 
the  papal  tiara,  cardinal's  hat,  the  patriarch's  cross,  the  mitre,  with  several  other 
things  ensigning  the  top  of  the  shield,  are  called  the  timbre;  on  all  which  I  shall 
insist  in  the  following  chapters. 

Timbre,  savs  Guillim  in  his  Display,  chap.  6.  Cometh  from  the  word  timmer;  for 
that  in  the  Allemagne  tongue  is  the  same  that  we  in  Latin  call  apex,  or  summitas 
acuminata,  the  crest.  To  timbre  the  arms  is  to  adorn  them  with  helmet,  mantle, 
crest,  &-C.  as  Chassenus  noteth.  Our  author  says,  "  Nulli  licitum,  nee  solet,  quis 
"  timbrare  arma  sua,  nisi  sit  saltem  eques  militaris  vulgo  clievalier,"  i.  e.  none  did 
nor  could  timbre  their  arms  but  a  knight,  commonly  called  a  chevalier:  But  with 
us  the  custom  is  otherwise;  for,  of  late,  every  gentleman  that  has  arms  may  timbre 
them;  for  each  particular  country  have  their  own  custom  in  bearing  of  arms;  which 
custom  seems  to  have  the  vigour  of  a  law,  "  Qiiia  consuetudo,  ubi  lex  scripta  non 
"  est,  valeat  quantum  lex,  ubi  scripta  est."     But  it  may  seem  that  such  bearings 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  3 

timbred  is  rather  tolerate  through  custom  than  allowed  in  the  strict  construction 
of  the  laws  of  arms  and  honour." 

Barnabe  Moreau  de  Vargas  makes  the  helmet  a  mark  of  nobility,  and  says  it  is 
the  crest  and  helmet  whicli  distinguishes  gentlemen  from  those  that  are  not  such. 
Menestrier,  with  other  heralds,  ascribes  the  custom  of  placing  the  helmet  and  crest 
upon  shields  of  arms  to  tournaments  and  joustings,  the  arms  bemg  a  sign  of  noble 
descent,  and  the  helmet,  crest,  &-C.  as  marks  of  chivalry.  And,  1  observe,  the>- 
have  been  anciently  so  taken  with  us;  for,  of  old,  our  nobility  had  only  their  arms 
in  a  shield  without  helmet  or  crest;  as  appears  by  their  seals  appended  to  ancient 
writs,  and  by  our  old  paintings  and  manuscripts  of  blazons.  But  our  high  no- 
bility, and  those  famous  for  chivalry,  had  their  arms,  of  old,  timbred  with  helmet, 
crest,  and  other  ornaments,  when  tournaments  were  in  use  with  us;  of  which  I 
have  given  an  account  in  the  First  Volume  of  this  System.  And  1  shall  here  add, 
for  my  reader's  better  understanding,  a  short  account  of  a  formula  in  the  festivals 
of  arms,  to  show  that  the  adorning  of  them,  now  in  fashion,  had  its  rise  from  those 
military  exercises,  viz..  "  That  they  who  came  and  were  admitted  behoved  to  be 
"  gentlemen  of  name  and  armsi,  and  their  shields  hung  up  in  public  places  some- 
"  time  before  the  prefixed  day  of  joustings,  with  the  helmets,  crests,  and  other 
"  devices  placed  above  their  shields  of  arms,  to  the  end  that  those  who  came  to 
"  exercise  might  be  known  to  each  others,  and  challenges  regularly  given  :  As 
"  also  that  the  lords  and  ladies,  who  were  to  assist  as  judges  at  these  exercises 
"  might  know,  by  the  arms  and  devices,  who  had  the  advantage  in  such  fights. 

"  The  shield  of  arms  being  thus  exposed  below  the  windows  of  houses  and  other 
"  public  places,  which  were  next  to  the  list  of  the  barriers,  were  always  pendent 
"  by  the  left  point  of  the  shield ;  upon  which  point  were  placed  the  helmets, 
"  mantlings,  crests,"  &-c.  Which  splendid  ceremony  was  by  the  French  called  a 
Faire  Fenestrie. 

It  is  then  from  this  custom  in  the  tournaments  that  we  meet  with  so  many  old 
shields  couche.  i.  e.  pendent  by  the  left  corner  upon  old  seals,  with  helmet,  and 
other  ornaments.  And  1  shall  give  a  few  instances  of  the  same  practice,  of  old, 
with  us,  in  the  following  chapters  on  the  seals  of  our  ancient  nobility,  which  I 
have  seen;  and  this  position  of  the  shield  couche  is  taken,  by  antiquaries  and  he- 
ralds, as  a  sign  that  the  owners  of  them  had  been  at  those  military  exercises,  into 
which  none  were  admitted  but  such  as  were  truly  noble  by  their  paternal  and  ma- 
ternal proofs  of  nobility;  ot  wh.ch  afteru'atds,  vvith  the  other  pieces  of  the  exterior 
ornaments.     And,  firbt,  of  the  bdmet. 


CHAP.    n. 

OF  THE  HELMET,  OR  CASQ.UE. 

AS  the  head  is  the  noblest  part  of  the  human  body,  so  the  helmet  is  doubtless 
the  noblest  part  appertaining  to  the  ornament  of  the  arms  of  nobility. 
Witli  the  ancients  it  was  an  honourable  ornament  of  the  head  called  gnlta,  from 
the  Greek  word  r«ir,  tlie  skin  of  a  beast,  with  which  the  ancients  covered  their 
heads  to  make  th^m  appear  terrible  in  battle,  as  historians  tell  us,.  Hoppingius  the 
the  lawyer  says.  That  of  old  helmets  were  made  of  leather,  fa/f^,  mateiia  prlmitus 
corium  fiiit ;  and  afterwards,  when^  it  was  made  of  any  metal,  it  was  called  cassis, 
and  distinguished  from  galea;,  as  our  author,  cassis  de  lamina,  sit  galea  de  corio: 
But  at  last  they  came  to  be  both  made  of  metal  for  the  better  defence  of  the  head; 
so  that  galea  and  cassis  are  not  distinguished  now. 

The  Helmet,  by  the  Germans  heien,  or  hellem,  which  imports  to  cover  the  head, 
as  our  author  says,  when  it  was  adorned  with  a  crest,  the  owners  thereof  were 
called  .S/j/7'z/,  or  Brenrn;  irova  whence  (says  he,  cap.  g.  de  yure  Iiisignium)  the 
dukes  of  Brunswick  and  Brandenburg,  whose  predecessors  were  Brynni,  i.  e. 
galeati,  having  helmets  crested ;  and  being  governors  of  castles,  as  Brynswic,  Arx 
Brynni,  and  Brandenburg,  Castellum  Breniii  dictum  fuerit. 

The  Italians  for  helmet  have  the  word  elmo,  which  is  the  same  with  the  German 

Vol.  II.  F  f. 


4  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

hellem;  the  Spaniards  have  the  word  celado,  from  the  hatin  eel  are,  because  it 
hides  the  face. 

The  French  for  helmet  use  the  heaum,  especially  when  they  understand  an  old- 
fashioned  close  helmet,  with  holes  for  breathing  and  seeing  through.  But  when 
the  helmet  is  open,  with  bars,  and  adorned  with  lambrequins,  crest,  and  other  or- 
naments, they  call  it  then  the  casque,  or  timbre:  The  last  they  use  ordinarily  for 
3II  the  marks  of  dignity  that  are  placed  upon  the  top  of  the  shield  or  escutcheon, 
whether  military,  civil,  or  ecclesiastic. 

I  shall  forbear  here  to  insist  upon  the  various  forms  of  helmets  in  all  ages 
and  countries,  and  proceed  to  their  matter  and  forms  as  now  generally  used  in 
Europe. 

Heralds  have  observed  three  things  in  respect  to  the  helmet,  its  matter,  form, 
and  situation. 

The  matter  of  which  they  are  supposed  to  be  made  is  of  the  metals,  gold,  silver, 
and  steel,  which  show  three  degrees  of  dignity  j  these  of  sovereign  princes  of  gold; 
these  of  the  high  nobility  of  silver;  and  these  of  the  lesser  nobility,  such  as  gen- 
tlemen, of  polished  steel.  Which  order  is  observed  in  Germany,  but  especially  in 
Flanders,  where,  by  an  edict  in  the  year  1616,  it  was  not  lawful  for  any  to  use  a 
gold  helmet  on  their  shield,  under  the  penalty  of  300  florins:  which  was  put 
in  execution  against  a  nobleman  contravening  that  edict  in  the  year  1658 ;  as 
the  author  of  the  Observationes  Eugene alogiccB  et  Heroica,  lib.  1.  cap.  8.  observes, 
where  he  tells  us  also,  that  the  emperor  did  sometimes  dispense  with  that  edict, 
by  allowing  some  of  his  favourites,  as  a  sign  of  great  honoui",  to  use  a  gold  hel- 
met; as  to  D.  Simon  de  Fierlundtz,  Chancellor  of  Brabant,  by  a  diploma  in  the 
year  1664. 

As  to  their  form,  they  are  either  close  or  open;  some  will  have  the  first  a  sign 
of  military  nobility,  and  an  open  one  of  civil  nobility.  This  distinction,  says  our 
author  last  mentioned,  is  not  observed  in  Flanders,  whether  open  or  close,  since 
both  high  and  low  nobles  use  them  both  ways;  yet,  in  Germany,  says  he,  a  close 
helmet  is  a  sign  of  a  begun  nobihty,  and  an  open  one  of  ancient  nobility,  and  an 
helmet  altogether  open  a  sign  of  s&vereignty,  and  when  with  bars,  of  dignified  no- 
bility, and  when  with  a  vizor  with  holes  only,  a  sign  of  inferior  nobihty.  The 
Germans  use  also  to  distinguish  the  degrees  of  nobihty  by  the  number  of  the  bars; 
eleven  of  them  show  the  sovereign  dignity  of  an  emperor  and  king,  nine  the  dig- 
nity of  a  duke  and  marquis,  seven  that  of  an  earl,  five  that  of  a  lord,  and  three  bars 
show  the  dignity  of  a  knight,  and  a  gentleman  by  descent;  and  the  same  form  of 
helmets,  with  the  number  of  bars  for  distinction,  the  Italian  Sylvester  Petra  Sancta 
gives  us  in  his  Tessera  Geniilitia. 

The  situation  of  the  helmet  on  the  shield,  fore-right,  fronting,  or  side-ways,  in- 
timates also  the  degrees  of  greatness  and  power,  by  the  matter  and  form,  as  above: 
So  that  a  close  helmet,  situate  side-ways,  is  a  mark,  as  heralds  tell  us,  of  a  gentle- 
man or  soldier,  who  has  acquired  honour  by  his  assiduous  services,  being  always 
ready  to  fight,  and  give  attention  to  the  commands  of  his  superior.  Wliether  tlie 
side-standing  helmet  looks  to  the  right  or  left  it  makes  no  difierence,  neither  is  it 
any  sign  of  illegitimation  though  tiirned  to  the  left,  though  some  heralds  affirm  it 
to  be  a  mark  of  bastardy,  as  Marcus  Gilbertus  Dewarenius:  But  the  most  learned- 
heralds  are  not  of  that  opinion,  and  look  upon  the  side-standing  helmet  situate  to 
the  left  to  be  as  honourable  as  that  to  the  right.  For  which  I  shall  add  the  words 
of  Sylvester  Petra  Sancta,  "  Obhquas  versus  levam  statui  cassides  tesserarias  dun- 
"  taxat  eorum,  quibus  desit  honor  legitimorum  natalium,  etenim  utrumque  per- 
"  aeque  decorum  esse  reor,  atque  est  decorum,  seuin  dextro  cornu  exercitus,  seu  in 
"  levo  dimicare,  militibusque  in  alterutro  pra^esse." 

When  a  close  helmet  stands  direct  forward,  it  shows  nobility  altogether  new, 
and  acquired  by  some  heroic  action ;  when  barred  and  placed  side-ways,  the  mark 
of  some  lord  that  has  no  command  in  battle  or  otherwise,  but  of  his  own  vassals: 
But  when  placed  fronting,  intimates  a  chief  command,  not  only  of  his  own,  but 
other  companies;  and  when  altogether  open  and  fronting  shows  an  absolute  and 
independent  power.  I  think  I  have  said  sufficiently,  according  to  foreign  heralds, 
a^nent  the  signification  of  the  matter,  situation,  and  form  of  helmets.  I  cannot 
but  here  add  what  Mene5trier  says  in  his  Origin  of  Exterior  Ornaments,  chap  i.. 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  5 

"  That  all  helmets  were  of  old  close  and  plain,  until  their  metal,  number  of  bars, 
"  and  situation,  came  to  be  taken  notice  of,  and  that  not  long  ago;  but  since  the 
"  year  1559,  when  the  French  gave  over  the  use  of  tournaments,  upon  the  acci- 
"  dent  which  happened  to  King  Henry  11.  of  France,  jousting  in  disport  at  a 
"  tournament  with  Gilbert  Earl  of  Montgomery,  Captain  of  the  Scots  Guards, 
"  who  thereby  was  wounded  in  the  eye  with  the  splinter  of  a  spear,  of  which  his 
"  majesty  died."  After  which  various  forms  of  helmets  were  used,  and  placed 
upon  shields  of  arms  by  the  nobility,  to  show  their  degrees  of  dignity  and  quality, 
especially  by  the  number  of  bars.  The  customs  of  France,  from  whence  we  had 
all  our  heraldry,  and  especially,  of  late,  in  distinguishing  the  degrees  of  nobility, 
by  the  matter,  form,  and  situation  of  helmets  on  the  shield,  are,  according  to  the 
French  heralds,  thus  : 

The  helmets  of  kings  and  emperors  are  all  of  gold  damasked,  fronting  (as  they 
say  tarre  de  front)  altogether  open  without  bars  and  vizor;  because  they  are  to  sec 
and  know  all  things,  and  command  all  without  contradiction. 

Dukes,  marquises,  and  earls,  have  silver  helmets  damasked  with  gold,  fronting 
with  nine  bars;  the  French  say  grille  et  mis  df  front. 

Viscounts,  barons,  and  knights,  iiave  silver  helmets  with  gold  edges,  standing  in- 
profile,  /.  e.  a  little  turned  to  the  side  with  seven  bars. 

Esquires  and  gentlemen  of  ancient  descent  have  side-standing  helmets  of  polish- 
ed steel,  with  five  bars  in  the  guard-vizor. 

To  gentlemen  of  three  descents  they  give  a  helmet  in  profile,  i.  e.  standing  side- 
ways, with  three  bars  only.  Which  forms  of  helmets  I  have  caused  engrave  in 
the  first  plate  belonging  to  this  chapter. 

To  a  Icnight  they  assign  the  helmet  standing  right  forward  with  the  beaver  a 
little  open,  to  signify  direction  and  command. 

The  Scots  and  the  English  have  their  helmets  after  one  form,  somewhat  dif- 
ferent from  those  of  the  French. 

A  gentleman  and  esquire  have  their  helmets  in  profile,  i.  e.  posited  side-ways 
with  the  beaver  close,  to  signify  his  attention  and  obedience. 

The  helmet  in  profile,  or  placed  side-ways,  and  open  with  bars,  belong,  to  all 
noblemen  in  Britain,  under  the  degree  of  a  duke. 

The  helmst  right  forward,  and  open  with  many  bars,  is  assigned  to  dukes,  princes 
of  the  blood  royal,  and  monarchs. 

The  monarchs  of  Great  Britain  have  their  helmets  that  same  way  fronting  witlv 
bars;  but  the  French  give  to  their  sovereigns  a  fore-standing  helmet,  open,  without 
bars,  and  vizor  of  gold  :  But  other  sovereigns,  as  the  emperor,  have  a  fore-standing 
helmet  with  eleven  bars  of  gold  ;  as  Sylvester  Petra  Sancta,  "  Cassis  penitus 
"  aperta  cum  undenis  clathris,  est  imperatoris,  est  regum,  est  principum  supre- 
"  morum." 

All  agree  that  an  open  helmet  is  nobler  than  a  close  one,  and  a  direct  fore-stand- 
ing helmet  than  a  side-standing  one,  upon  the  accounts  above  given  ;  yet,  by  our 
practice,  a  knight  has  a  fore-standing  helmet  open,  and  our  dignified  nobility  a 
side-standing  helmet  with  bars.  The  reason  of  which  seems  to  be,  because  bars 
are  more  noble  than  visors  or  beavers,  though  cast  up ;  and  I  think  the  bars  should 
be  numbered,  to  distinguish  the  degrees  of  our  nobility. 

When  they  all  go  to  battle,  they  have  close  helmets  of  steel  or  brass  for  the  de- 
fence of  the  head,  which  are  not  of  gold  or  silver,  nor  formed  with  a  certain  num- 
ber of  bars,  which  are  used  for  ostentation,  and  placed  upon  the  top  of  the  shield,- 
to  show  the  degrees  of  nobility  in  public  places,  and  at  solemn  assemblies. 

Our  herald-painters,  at  funeral  occasions,  make  the  helmets  of  the  deceased  no- 
bility of  pasteboard  argaited,  and  parcel  gilt  with  fine  gold  in  oil ;  and  are  fa- 
shioned after  the  forms  mentioned  with  these  of  the  English. 

Elias  Ashm.ole,  in  his  Institutions  of  the  MostNoble  Oi'der  of  the  Garter,  chap.  XI. 
sect.  7.  tells  us,  "  That  the  Knights  Companions  of  this  Order  have,  besides  their 
"  escutcheon  of  arms,  their  helmet,  crest,  and  sword  hung  up  over  their  stalls  in 
"  the  chappel  of  St  George  at  Windsor,  and  ordained  to  remain  there  during  the 
"  lives  of  their  possessors.  The  helmets  used  on  this  occasion  (says  our  author) 
"  are  made  of  steel,  large  and  fair,  of  a  more  than  ordinary  proportion,  and  are  of 
"  two  sorts ;  one  appomted  for  sovereign  princes  gilded  and  formed  open,  with 


6  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

"  bailes  or  bars ;  the  other  for  Knights  Subjects  in  the  reign  of  Henry  VIII.  were 
"  parcel  gilt :  but  in  Queen  EHzabeth's  reign  and  since  it  is  the  custom  to  gild 
"  the  helmets  all  over,  having  close  visors,  and  to  place  St  George's  red  cross  m 
"  the  middle  before  the  visors  ;  and  these  are  the  form  of  the  helmets  of  the  Knights 
"  of  tiie  Garter  at  Windsor  :  but  their  helmets  placed  on  their  shields  of  arms  in 
"  other  places  are  after  the  form  we  have  been  speaking  of,  as  all  others  of  their 
"  quality,  without  regard  to  them,  as  Knights  of  the  garter." 

When  there  are  two  helmets  placed  on  an  escutcheon  of  arms,  they  look  to  one 
another  of  whatsomever  quality  the  possessor  be  ;  and  when  there  are  three  hel- 
mets, that  in  the  middle  is  placed  fronting,  and  the  other  two  contourne,  i.  e.  turned 
to  it :  and  if  there  be  four  helmets  on  a  shield,  two  looks  to  two.  The  practice 
of  multiplying  helmets  is  frequent  with  the  Germans,  to  show  the  number  of  their 
honourable  feus,  by  which  tiiey  have  as  many  votes  in  the  circles.  The  helmet 
with  them  is  a  sign  of  eminent  nobihty  ;  if  there  are  four,  six,  or  eight  helmets, 
the  one  half  of  them  are  turned  looking  to  the  other  with  their  mantlings  and 
crests. 


OF  THE  ORNAMENTS  OF  THE  HELMET,    COMMONLY  CALLED  MANTLINGS,    LAMBREQUINS, 
HACHEMENTS,    VOLETS,    13".. 

ANTIQUARIES  and  historians  tell  us,  as  I  said  before,  the  helmets  of  he- 
roes at  first  were  made  of  the  skins  of  beasts,  and  afterwards,  as  more  con- 
venient, of  metal,  which  they  covered  with  the  skins  of  cruel  and  rapacious  beasts, 
such  as  lions,  tigers,  bears,  &-c.  that  they  might  appear  terrible  to  their  enemies, 
and  stately  and  magnificent ;  they  covered  not  only  their  helmets,  but  also  the 
armour  of  their  bodies  with  taffeta,  or  other  pieces  of  stuff,  of  such  colours  and  fi- 
gures as  they  fancied,  that  they  might  be  distinguislied  and  known  in  battle  ;  as 
Polyb.  lib.  6.  cap.  20.  "  Ut  ejusmodi  tegmentum  &•  ornatus  pariter  insigne  sit, 
"  per  quod  quisque,  aut  strenue,  aut  ignaviter,  se  in  prselio  gerens,  a  praefecto  suo 
"  agnosceretur." 

These  coverings  of  the  helmet  are  called  by  the  Latin  writers  te^mtna  galea,. 
from  their  use  in  preserving  the  helmets  from  rain  and  dust ;  the  Germans  call  it 
very  fitly,  helm  decken,  i.  e.  the  cover  or  dress  of  the  helmet,  the  English,  mant- 
lings, by  the  French  capelines,  lambrequins,  hachements,  volets,  &-c. 

This  ornament  of  armory,  by  Guillim,  is  called  improperly  a  mantle,  from  the 
French  v.'ord  manteau,  with  us  taken  for  a  long  robe,  a  miUtary  habit  used  in  an- 
cient times  by  great  commanders  in  the  field,  as  well  to  manifest  their  high  place, 
as  also  (being  cast  over  their  armour)  to  repel  the  extremity  of  wet,  cold,  and 
heat,  and,  withal,  to  preserve  their  armour  from  rust.  The  manteaux  are  different 
pieces  of  ornament  of  the  achievement,  upon  which  the  whole  achievement  is  laid, 
and  called  the  ducal  mantle,  of  which  afterwards.  But,  by  this  ornament  of  the 
head,  there  remaineth  neither  shape  nor  shadow  of  a  mantle  ;  for  how  can  it  be 
imagined,  that  a  piece  of  cloth,  or  whatsoever  other  stuff,  that  is  jagged  and  froun- 
ced after  the  manner  of  our  common  received  mantlings,  used  for  the  adorning  of 
the  helmets,  being  imposed  upon  the  shoulders  of  a  man,  should  serve  him  to  any 
of  the  purposes  for  which  mantles  were  ordained.  So  that  these  being  compared 
with  those,  may  be  more  fitly  termed  flourishings  than  mantlings.  Sir  George 
Mackenzie  tells  us,  "  That  the  ornament  of  the  helmet  was  never  intended  to  re- 
"  present  a  covering  to  the  bearer  or  his  shield,  but  only  to  his  helmet,  and  carried 
"  to  show  the  variety  of  its  jagged  cuts  sustained  in  battle,  which  was  in  some  mea- 
"  sure  of  their  form,  by  the  fluttering  of  the  wind." 

The  French  heralds  assure  us,  that  these  mantles  were  originally  no  other  than 
short  coverings,  which  commanders  wore  over  their  helmets  to  defend  their  heads  from 
the  weather  ;  and  that  going  into  battles  with  these,  they  were  wont  to  come  away 
with  them  hanging  about  them  in  a  ragged  manner,  occasioned  by  the  many  cuts 
they  had  received  on  their  heads ;  and  therefore,  the  mor?  liacked  they  were,  the 
more  honourable  they  were  accounted.  When  these  hoods  are  entire  and  not  cut, 
L 


EXTERIOR  ORNAINIENTS,  7 

the  French  call  them  capdines,  (as  that  one  upon  the  helmet  of  the  arms  of  Cham . 
paign,  so  frequent  m  many  books)  and  from  which  is  a  saying  wiUi  the  French, 
un  homme  de  cupeline,  for  a  man  resolute  and  ready  to  fight. 

Marc  Voulosen  de  la  Columbier,  in  the  42d  chap,  of  his  Science,  says,  "  That 
"  those  trimmings  of  the  helmet  served  as  an  ornament  to  accompany  a  coat  of 
"  arms,  which  would  ha%-e  had  an  evil  grace,  if  the  helmet  had  remained  bare  and 
"  naked." 

The  antientest  practice  of  this  hood,  mantling  or  capeline,  I  have  observed,  is 
on  the  equestrian  seals  of  the  Earls  of  Flanders,  given  us  by  Olivarus  Uredus  de  Si- 
gillis  Cofnitum  Flandrice,  where,  in  that  curious  book,  is  tiie  seal  of  Robert  Earl  of 
Flanders.  He  is  represented  iu  armour  on  horseback,  holding-  on  his  left  arm  the 
armorial  shield  of  Flanders  ;  and  upon  his  helmet  is  a  hood,  or  capeline,  entire 
and  uncut,  hanging  back  over  his  neck ;  and  upon  it  was  placed  his  crest  in  the 
years  1304,  ar«i  afterwards  some  of  his  successors  were  so  trimmed  with  helmets  on 
their  heads,  topped  with  their  crests;  which  helmets,  so  trimmed,  were  not  then 
placed  on  their  shields  of  arms,  until  Philip  the  Bold,  Duke  of  Burgundy,  and  Earl 
of  Flanders  timbred  his  shield  of  arms  with  helmet,  capeline,  and  crest  in  the 
year  1384,  as  by  his  seal  to  be  seen  in  the  fore-meptioned  book,  and  which  prac- 
tice continued  with  his  successors.  It  is  to  be  observed,  that  the  trimming  of  the 
shield  with  helmet,  mantling,  and  crest,  came  from  the  military  dress  of  great  men. 
Sandford,  in  his  Genealogical  History  of  the  Kings  of  England,  gives  us  the  seal  of 
arms  of  Thomas  Earl  of  L^v^^caster,  eldest  son  of  Edmund,  brother  to  Edward  I. 
of  England,  where,  upon  the  helmet,  there  is  a  capeline,  and  upon  it  a  wiveron 
or  dragon,  for  crest ;  the  capeline  he  calls  an  ancient  mantling,  and  says  the  crest 
is  the  lirst  he  did  see  used  by  these  of  the  royal  family. 

Sir  George  Mackenzie,  in  his  Science  of  Heraldry,  gives  the  equestrian  side  of 
the  seal  of  IM'Duff  Earl  of  Fife,  where  he  is  in  armour  on  horseback,  holding  in 
his  right  hand  a  sword,  and  on  his  left  arm  his  shield  of  arms,  and  upon  his  head 
his  helmet  affronte,  and  grille  a  capeline,  with  a  long  tail  hanging  over  his  back. 
In  several  herald  books,  and  in  one  of  the  editions  of  Guillim's  Display,  there  are 
entire  hoods  or  capelines  for  mantlings.  But  I  proceed  to  other  forms  of  mant- 
lings,  from  which  they  have  various  names  with  other  nations. 

When  they  are  represented  curiously  cut  like  the  leaves  of  parsley,  such  as  those 
which  top  the  pillars  of  Corinthian  work,  have  made  some  heralds  think  the  custom 
of  using  such  on  helmets  to  have  come  from  garlands,  made  of  such  leaves,  for 
which  they  call  them  feuilles.  Others  again,  upon  the  account  that  mantlings  be- 
ing cut  and  torn  in  several  pieces  and  shreds,  like  labels  hanging  down,  are  taken 
for  ribbands  which  tied  crowns  and  garlands  ;  they  term  them  lambrequins,  from 
the  latin  word  lemniscus,  which  signifies  a  label,  piece  of  stuff,  or  ribband. 

The  true  rise  of  the  present  forms  of  mantlings  jagged  and  frounced,  is  from  the 
the  heroes  returning  from  battle  with  their  hoods  or  capelines.  Afterwards,  in 
process  of  time,  the  same  authors  say,  they  were  by  degrees  made  deeper,  and  so 
from  the  helmet  hung  down  below  the  whole  shield,  adorned  according  to  the 
honour  of  the  bearer,  or  the  fancy  of  the  painter:  These  things,  which  at  first 
were  regulate  as  marks  of  distinction,  afterwards  became  common  to  all  sorts  of 
quality. 

Oliver  de  la  March,  describing  the  equipage  of  the  King  of  the  Romans,  says, 
"  That  he  carried  a  tood  on  his  helmet,  with  laps  hanging  down  to  the.  saddle,  all 
"  curiously  cut  like  the  leaves  of  parsley. 

Voulosen  de  la  Columbier  and  Mencstrier,  in  their  Treatises  of  Exterior  Orna- 
mets,  both  eminent  writers  in  this  science,  tell  us,  "  That  this  ornament  of  the 
"  helmet,  sometimes  represented  hanging  down  by  the  sides  of  the  shield,  was  of 
"  old  no  other  thing  than  the  cover  or  hood  of  the  helmet,  (called,  as  before,  the 
"  capeline,  when  entire)  which,  being  cut  in  battle,  was  a  sign  of  military  valour; 
"  and,  being  so  accidentally  cut,  was,  by  art,  fashioned  into  the  forms  or  shapes  of 
"  the  leaves  of  trees  or  herbs,  and  other  things  that  they  best  pleased ;  and  some- 
"  times  adorned  with  embroideries  and  precious  stones,  became  a  suitable  dress  for 
"  true  nobility,  called  by  the  French  hticheinents,  from  the  old  French  word  ache- 
"  vient,  which  signifies  the  ornament  of  the  nead."  And  Chitiletius,  in  his  Latin 
blazons  of  the  Knights  of  the  Golden  Fleece,  calls  them  facennunta,  by  changing 

Vol.  II.  G  g 


&  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

the  letter  H  to  letter  F,  which  ordinarily  the  Spainards  do  in  other  words,  av 
Menestrier  observes ;  and  other  heralds;,  who  write  in  Latin,  call  them  not  only 
faceumenta,  hnifascce,  lacima,  and  p/.vikrte  ;  and  when  they  do  not  hang  down  by. 
the  sides  of  the  shield,  but  riy  out  above  the  heads  of  the  supporters,  are  then  cal- 
led by  the  French  volets. 

Having  considered  mantlings,  I  proceed  now  to  their  tinctures,  which  were  of 
old  with  us,  and  are  still  with  other  nations,  of  the  same  with  the  armorial  tinctures 
of  the  paternal  arms  of  the  bearers,  though  quartered  with  these  of  other  families  and 
dignities  :  and  when  theie  are  two  casques,  i.  e.  helmets,  trimmed  with  such,  then- 
they  are  of  the  tinctures  of  the  quarters,  for  which  they  are  the  proper  casques  be- 
longing to  these  quarters ;  as  in  the  achievement  of  the  Dukes  of  Bavaria  ;  quar- 
terly, first  and  fourth,  sable,  a  lion  crowned  or,  langued  and  armed  gules ;  second, 
and  third,  bendy  lozengy,  argent  and  azure,  over  all  an  escutcheon  ^///fj-,  charged 
with  an  imperial  mond  or :  On  the  shield  of  those  quartered  arms  are  placed  two 
helmets,  adorned  with  their  proper  mantlings  or  hachements,  viz.  that  on  the 
right,  sable  and  or ;  and  the  other  on  the  left,  argent  and  azure;  which  two  casques 
look  to  or.e  another. 

I  shall  here  mention  the  sculpture  and  blazon  of  the  arms  of  Colonel  Alexan- 
der M'DowALL,  Baron  of  Lodvica  in  Swedland,  as  in  the  First  Part  of  this  System  ; 
quarterly,  first,  azm-e,  a  lion  rampant  argent,  crowned  or ;  second  gules,  an  arm  in. 
armour  argent,  holding  a  cross  eroslet  fitched  azure  ;.  third,  ar,  a  lymphad  sable ; 
fourth,  or,  a  rock  snblc  in  base,  and,  in  chief,  tv.to  salmons  nalant,  proper;  and  oven 
all,  by  way  of  surtout,  an  escutcheon  as  the  first,  ensigned  with  a  double  crown. 
The  shield  of  his  arms  is  timbred  after  the  German  and  Swedish  fashion  v/ith  three- 
crests,  that  in  the  middle  being  a  ducal  coronet,  and  upon  it  a  dove,,  all  proper, 
between  two  helmets  fronting  one  another,  adorned  with  mantlings  of  the  tinctures 
of  the  arms,  and  ensigned  with  ducal  coronets  in  place  of  wreaths :  out  of  that  orr 
the  right  issueth  a  lion  argent,  crowned  or  ;  and  from  that  on  the  left,  an  arm  in 
armour  holding  a  cross  eroslet  fitched,  as  before.  For  which  see  the  5th  Plate  of 
Achievements  taken  from  those  arms  finely  illuminated  in  the  middle  of  his  patent 
of  nobility  granted  by  King  Charles  XI.  of  Sweden,  to  Colonel  Gustavus  Mac- 
dowall.  Baron  of  Lodvica,  in  the  year  1674,  father  of  the  above  Colonel  Alexander, 
in  whose  hands  I  have  seen  the  patent ;  as  also  a  genealogical  tree  of  the  family, 
as  descended  of  M'Dowall  of  MakM^ton.  For  more  account  of  this  family,  see 
the  First  Part  of  this  System,  page  413. 

When  many  casques  timbre  the  shield  with  relation  to  quarters,  they  are  then  of, 
the  tinctures  of  those  quarters  they  belong  to  ;  as  on  the  escutcheon  of  the  Dukes 
of  Saxony  (which  contain  twenty-one  quarters)  are  eight  helmets,  with  mantlings 
of  the  tinctures  of  the  quarters  they  belong  to.  These  curtly  blazoned  by  Imhoif, 
"  Phalerarum  quibus  circumfusse  sunt,  has^galeae  possunt  ab  areolis  dignosci." 

The  English  have  all  the  mantlings  of  gentlemen  and  knights  red  without,  and 
lined  or  doubled  with  white  within,  and  those  of  dignified  nobility  also  red,  but 
doubled  with  ermine ;  and  the  mantlings  of  their  sovereigns  are  of  gold,  doubled 
with  ermine,  to  distinguish  those  degrees  of  nobility  :  so  that  in  blazon  they  say, 
"■  Which  shield  is  timbred  with  helmet  and  mantling  befitting  their  quahty,  with- 
"  out  naming  the  tinctures."  Which  practice  of  late  our  heralds  have  followed  ; 
but  by  our  old  illuminated  books  of  arms,  I  observe  the  mantlings  to  be  of  the  tinc- 
tures of  the  arms  within  the  shield. 

Ashmole,  in  his  above-mentioned  book,  says,  "  The  Knights  Companions  of  the 
"  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Garter  have  their  helmets  hung  up  in  Windsor,  with 
•'  their  mantlings  of  cloth  of  gold  lined  with  white  satin  :  at  the  bottom  of  these 
"  mantlings  hang  a  pair  of  gilt  knobs  burnished  with  gold,  from  which  issue  out 
"  tassels  either  of  gold  or  silver  (according  as  is  the  metal  in  the  king's  coat 
•'  armour)  mixed  with  silk  of  the  principal  colours  in  the  arms  of  the  Knights 
"  Companions;  which  tassels,  being  of  the  tincture  of  the  arms,  represent  the  an- 
•'  cient  mantlings;  those  tassels  are  called  appendices  in  the  statutes  of  Henry  VIII. 
"  No\y  the  knights  of  whatsoever  dignity,  as  the  companions  with  the  sovereign  in 
"  this  order,  are  allowed  gold  helmets,  gold  mantHngs,  doubled  ermine,  as  the 
"  sovereigns;  but  their  helmets  and  mantlings,  in  other  places  and  oecasions,  must 
"  be  after  the  degrees  of  their  quality." 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


CHAP.     IV. 

OF    THE    WREATH    OR    TORCE. 


THE  wreath  is  made  of  two  or  more  pieces  of  silk  of  divers  colours,  wreathed' 
or  twisted  together,  and  is  called  a  ft/tr,  quia  torqiietur  \  by  the  French, 
tortil,  and  by  us,  of  old,  the  roll  or  ro~jii,  because  its  pieces  of  dilFerent  colours  are 
stopped  with  flax  to  keep  a  round  shape  ;  and  for  which  the  French  call  it  bouilrt, 
from  bourre,  which  signifies  flax  or  wool,  wherewith  they  stop  cushions  and  other 
utensils. 

These  were  anciently  called  by  the  Latins,  corolhK,plectiles,  and  were  different 
of  old  from  crowns  and  coronets,  they  being  made  of  twisted  silk  of  diverse  colours, 
which  fixed  or  tied  the  mantlings  co  the  helmet,  and  was  a  part  of  the  timbre  as 
at  this  time  ;  but  of  old  none  was  allowed  to  use  them  but  these  that  were  ho- 
noured -by  the  sovereign,  or  who  had  assisted  at  the  coronation  of  kings  ;  as  Hop- 
pingius,  cap.  9.  §  I.  "  Qiiod  jus  portandi  ejusmodi  corollas  non  pertinent,  nisi  ad 
"  iilos  quibus  ipsis  collatus  fuit,  hie  honor,  aut  aliquis  ex  illorum  majoribus  in  coro- 
"  natione  regibus  inserviret." 

Menestrier,  speaking  of  this  ornament,  says,  "  That  some  hundred  years  ago 
"  the  French  nobility  used  such  garlands  made  of  twisted  silk,  with  which  they 
"  kept  fast  upon  their  heads  their  hoods  and  caps ;  as  may  be  seen,  says  the  au- 
"  thor,  on  ancient  paintings,  and  especially  on  the  images  and  pictures  of  the 
"  old  dukes  of  Burgundy  and  Milan;  afterwards  the  use  of  it  in  armorieswas  to 
"  fasten  the  mantlings  or  lambrequins  upon  the  helmet." 

Favin,  in  his  Theatre  of  Honour,  says,  "  Wreaths  were  made  of  cords  of  silk 
"  twisted  together,  Vv'hich  were  of  the  colours  of  the  arms,  the  liveries  of  the 
"  owners  or  their  mistresses,  with  which  the  ladies  (says  Menestrier)  were  wont  to 
"  tie  and  fix  the  mantlings  of  the  knights  to  their  helmets  in  the  days  of  solem- 
"  nizing  of  tournaments,  for  Vv'hich  they  are  called  in  romances,  ladies'  favours  ; 
"  as  in  that  formula  of  the  tournament  perfornied  at  Placenza  by  King  Reynold. 
"  Prom  which  also  we  learn,  says  our  author,  that  the  lambrequins  were  always  of 
"  the  colours  of  the  arms,  and  the  wreaths  might  have  been  of  any  other  colours. 
"  But  now-a-days  the  practice  is  otherwise  in  Britain,  for  the  mantlings  or  1am- 
"  brequins  are  not  of  the  colours  of  the  arms  as  before ;  but  the  wreaths  are  al- 
"  ways  of  the  armorial  tinctures,  and  even  so  used  by  the  Knights  of  the  Garter 
"  on  their  stars  at  Windsor." 

The  mixture  of  the  colours  of  the  wreaths  being  taken  from  the  metals  and 
colours  of  the  paternal  arms,  though  quartered  with  many  other  coats  of  arms  in 
one  shield,  for  the  more  orderly  disposing  of  the  colours  of  the  wreaths ;  Gerartl 
Leigh  gives  this  rule,  "  That  the  metal  should  be  begun  with  first,  and  then 
"  the  colour :"  But  Sir  George  Mackenzie  gives  a  more  distinct  rule,  agreeable  to 
the  practice  of  other  nations,  "  That  the  first  tincture  in  the  wreaths  should  be 
"  that  of  the  field,  and  then  that  of  the  immediate  charge,  and  after  that  the  next 
"  mediate  and  so  iforth,  if  there  be  supercharges :  But  yet,  says  he,  there  are 
"  some  old  wreaths  with  us  that  are  not  of  the  tinctures  of  the  arms,  and  possibly 
"  they  at  first  might  have  come  from  the  colours  of  their  mistresses'  favours.  By 
"  old  seals  we  cannot  know  the  tinctures  of  the  arms  and  wreaths ;  but  on  the  an- 
"  cient  seals  of  our  High  Stewards  of  Scotland  they  had  their  wreath  cheque  as 
"  the  armorial  figure  of  the  fesse  cheque." 

The  wreath  in  Camden's  Latin  Blazons  is  called  tortile,  in  Imhoff's  vitta,  and 
sometimes  tenia,  and  by  others  corolla,  taking  it  for  a  garland,  which  the  ancients 
used  of  old  to  adorn  their  hehnets  with. 

The  blazon  then  of  such  exterior  ornaments  already  treated  of  runs  thus:  Which 
shield  of  arms  is  timbred  with  helmet  and  mantling  suitable  to  the  bearer's  quality, 
and  on  a  wreath  of  his  tinctures  for  crest,  &-c.  If  the  colours  of  the  wreath  be 
not  of  these  of  the  arms  then  they  are  to  be  named.  Furrs  used  in  arms  are  also 
to  be  found  in  the  wreath. 


10  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

Wreaths  are  sometimes  laid  aside,  and  in  their  place  crowns,  ducal  caps,  or  eccle- 
siastic tiars,  upon  which  stand  the  crest ;  of  which  I  shall  speak  in  the  following 
chapters. 

When  crests  are  used  alone,  as  upon  the  sides  of  seals,  coaches,  and  other  uten- 
sils, we  find  them  always  placed  on  a  wreath.  Gerard  Leigh  says,  "  That  in  the 
"  reiyn  of  Henry  V.  no  man  under  a  knight  durst  place  his  crest  on  a  wreath,  but 
"  on  an  escrol  ;  but  now  he,  who  has  liberty  to  timbre  his  arms  with  helmet  and 
'-'  mantlings,  may  place  his  crest  on  a  wreath." 


C  H  A  P.    V. 

OF   THE    CREST    OR    CIMLER. 

THE  crest  is  the  highest  part  of  the  achievement,  being  placed  upon  the  most 
eminent  parts  of  the  helmet,  but  yet  so,  as  thai  it  admitteth  an  interposi- 
tion of  tlie  mantle,  wreaths,  chapeau,  crowns,  &c.  It  is  named  crest  from  crista, 
which  signifies  a  comb  or  tuft,  such  as  many  birds  have  upon  their  heads  ;  as  the 
cock,  and  peacock,  lapwing,  lark,  &.c.  The  Persians  called  the  Carians  (an  an- 
cient people  in  Asia)  cocks,  because  they  appeared  in  battle  with  crests  on  their 
helmets ;  and  to  them  some  heralds  ascribe  the  rise  of  arms  and  crests. 

The  French  heralds  call  them  chniers,  from  cime,  which  signifies  the  height  or 
top  of  any  thing  ;  by  the  Latins,  cimerium,  quasi  in  cimo  collocutum ;  by  the  Ita- 
lians, ciniiero :  and  Minshew,  in  his  Dictionary,  calls  it,  conus  galece,  apex ;  and 
adds,  "  Est  in  arraatura  signum  ad  familiarum  differentiam,  quod  gestant  nobiles 
"  in  scuti  suprema  parte,  has  cristas  vocant."  Syl.  P.  S.  calls  it,  acroteriiim,  in  his 
72d  chap,  de  variis  tesserarix  galece  acroteriis.  It  is  sometimes  called  by  heralds, 
thimbnnn  j  but  that  is  too  general  a  term,  for  all  the  ornaments  which  adorn  the 
helmet  are  called  timbre  of  the  shield. 

The  word  thimbrum  or  tymhrum,  some  derive  from  timbus  a  tomb,  or  monument 
of  the  dead  or  living,  from  which  the  verb  timbrare,  i.  e.  to  timbre  the  shield  with 
crown,  helmet,  mantlings,  wreaths,  crest,  &c.  as  Hoppingius,  cap.  9.  "  Nostri 
"  timbri  iituntur  voce,  facta  forsan  ad  cimbri,  hoc  est  busti  analogium  ;  indeque 
"  verbum  timbrare,  sive  timbro  galeam  ornare." 

As  for  the  antiquity  of  crests,  it  appears  that  the  ancientest  of  the  Heathen  Gods- 
wore  them  even  before  the  use  of  arms,  and  were  made  of  iron  or  steel.  Jupiter 
Ammon  bore  a  ram's  head  for  his  crest  ;  Mars,  that  of  a  lion  or  tyger,  casting  out, 
fire  at  his  mouth  and  nostrils  ;  and  Minerva,  the  mistress  of  arts  and  goddess  of 
victory,  bore  a  sphinx  between  two  griffins,  the  emblem-  of  secrecy ;  Proteus,  whom 
the  fable  represents  to  us  in  so  many  shapes,  was  a  chevalier,  who  every  day 
changed  his  crest,  sometimes  having  the  head  of  a  lion,  at  other  times  the  head 
of  a  boar,  of  a  horse,  of  a  bull,  of  a  dragon,  &-c.  by  which  he  was  looked  upon 
as  a  monster  of  many  different  forms;  as  the  first  horsemen  were  looked  upon 
to  be  Centaurs,  that  is  half  men  half  horse.  Hercules,  for  his  crest,  used  the  head 
of  a  lion,  and  with  the  skin  covered  his  body  ;  Aventinus,  as  descended  of  him,, 
had  the  same  ;  Alexander  the  Great  had  also  the  head  of  a  lion,  and  sometimes 
the  head  of  a  goat,  to  show  that  he  was  descended  of  Jupiter  Ammon ;  Julius 
Csesar  carried  sometimes  a  star,  to  show  that  he  was  come  of  Venus,  at  other  times 
the  head  of  a  bull,  elephant,  and  wolf;  Marcus  Corvinus,  a  noble  Roman,  had 
upon  his  helmet  a  raven,  to  commemorate  a  notable  victory  which  he  obtained  ; 
because,  in  the  time  of  a  fight,  the  raven  sat  on  his  helmet,  which  his  posterity  per- 
petuated by  such  a  figure.     As  Virgil,  lib.  5. 

Corvir.iis  plioebaea  sedit  cui  casside  fulva, 
Ostentans  ales,  preavitae  insignia  pugnte. 

Thus  we  see  that  crests  are-  derived  from  the  remotest  antiquity,  though  now 
not  used  in  war,  armour  being  laid  aside ;  but  in  coat-armour  they  still  continue. 

For  the  ancients  using  them  on  their  heads  or  helmets,  historians  and  heralds  give 
several  reasons ;  first,  For  the  carrying  the  parts  of  fierce  animals,  that  the  mili- 
1 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  ii 

tary  men  might  appear  fierce  to  strike  terror  in  their  enemies  ;  :•£  Tacitus  speak- 
ing of  the  Parthiaiis  ; 


-Ore  ferarum,  rictuque  hotrificaiit  galea?. 


And  Virgil,  lib.  8. 

Terribilem  cristis  galeam  flammasque  vomcntem. 

And,  ^dly.  To  theend  they  might  appear  the  more  beautiful,  and  so  much  taller 
than  they  were,  ^dly,  Some  earned  crests  out  of  superstition,  as  a  token  of  respect 
and  reverence;  as  the.  Swedes,  by  the  relation  of  Tacitus,  who  says  they  supersti- 
tiously  carried  the  boar.  His  words  ai-e,  "  Insigne  superstitionis  formas  apronun 
"  gestans."  Hayton,  in  his  History  of  the  Tartars,  tells,  "  That  since  the  Em- 
"  peror  Zingi  was  delivered  fiam  his  enemies  by  the  meaus  of  an  owl,  which, 
"  perching  upon  a  tree  in  »/hch  iie  was  hid,  made  his  enemies  believe  there  could 
"  be  no  mau  there,  seeing  the  owl  so  tamely  took- her  rest:  Upon  which  account, 
"  as  a  lucky  bird,  the  kings  of  that  country  bore  the  owl  for  their  cres«;  and  the 
"  Tartars  had  that  bird  after  in  great  veneration,  and  thought  themselves  happy  if 
"  they  could  get  any  of  its  feathers  to  wear  upon  their  heads." 

i^th'y,  They  were  used  to  distinguish  in  time  of  battle,  and  to  be  known  by  their 
men,  that  they  might  stick  fast  -to  them  then,  and  rally  again  about  them  if  dis- 
persed ;  and,  therefore,  says  an  English  writer,  "  Esquires,  who  had  no  notable 
"  command,  were  not  pennitted  to  wear  such  on  their  helmets." 

The  primitive  Christians,  says  Menestrier,  had  for  their  crests  and  cognizances 
burning  crosses,  i.  e.  crosses  with  rays.  There  is  a  resemblance  of  this  custom  yet 
with  us  in  the  Highlands;  when  invaded,  the  inhabitants  send  burntcrosses  through 
the  country  to  make  all  run  to  arms.. 

Of  old  none  were  allowed  to  use  crests  and  cognizances,  but  those  that  were 
eminent;  as  Diodorus  Siculus  in  his  History  of  Egypt;  neither  did  the  Romans 
allow  them  to  be  used  by  any  under  the  degree  of  a  knight:  And  the  Emperor 
Vespasian  discharged  the  use  of  them  from  those  that  had  not  saved  seven  citizens, 
"  Q^iii  septem  cives  non  servassent."  Anciently  those  devices  or  cognizances  were 
arbitrarily  taken  up,  and  laid  down  at  pleasure,  and  were  not  fixed  and  hereditary 
marks  of  families  as  afterwards :  .But  we  may  say  the  first  use  of  them  became  the 
seed  and  elements  of  armories,  wiien  they  passed  from  the  heads  of  heroes  to  their 
shields,  banners,  pennons,  ahd  gideons;  but,  in  later  times,  these  cognizances  or 
devices,  we  may  say,  do  now  pass  from  the  shield  to  the  helmet  first  used  upon  it, 
having  the  same  signification  and  import;  as  is  observed  by  Hoppingius  rfc  J;/?-? 
Insignium,  cap.  9.  memb.  8.  "  lUud  fere  regulare  est  quod  ea;dem  galea;  imponun- 
"  tur  figurse,  qure  scuto  insertte  conspiciuntur;  quo  casu,  quae  originis  causa  in 
"  scuto,  eadem  ut  plurimum  &  in  galea  erit,  dixi  ut  plurimum,  nam  nobilissimi 
"  collumniorum  in  Italia  familia.  illud  quo  galeae  erat  insignse,  clypeo  applicavit, 
"  postea  vero  ad  galeam  revocavit." 

The  family  of  Cclonni  in  Italy  it  seems  used  on  their  helmet  a  pillar  for  their 
cognizance,  relative  to  their  name  Colonna,  which  they  afterwards  placed  in  tlie 
shield,  as  the  armorial  fi.gure  of  the  family,  and  since  have  placed  again  for  a  crest. 
And,  as  I  observed  before,  his  Majesty  George,  King  of  Great  Britain,  has  now  in 
the  royal  achievement  of  Britain  the  wild  horse  of  Saxony,  ingrafted  by  way  of 
ente,  which  before  was  the  crest  of  the  Dukes  and  Princes  of  Brunswick.  But 
more  of  such  changes  immediately. 

The  crest,  of  whatever  figure,  was  first  carried  of  old  by  heroes  on  the  top  of 
their  helmets,  anciently  called  by  us  and  the  English  badges,  and  cognizances  by 
the  French  and  Italians,  for  their  symbolical  import.  Devices  and  impresses  are  of 
an  older  use  than  arms;  and  some  say,  that  those  ancient  badges  being  afterwards 
regulate,  fixed,  and  made  hereditary  marks  of  honour,  to  the  descendants  of  a  fa- 
mily, placed  on  surcoats,  banners,  shields,  and  other  military  utensils,  were  from 
them  called  arms,  and  for  a  long  time  continued  within  the  form  of  the  shield, 
without  any  embellishments  adorning  the  outer  parts  of  it  as  now. 

The  first  rise  of  those  embellishments  in  adorning  the  helmet  were  used  in 
battlesat  general  musters;  and  especially  in  tournaments  and  joiistings  in  Franca 

Vol.  II.  H  h 


12  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

and  Germany,  where  these  military  exercises  first  began ;  and  then  proceeded  to 
other  countries,  where  great  men  desired  to  be  known,  and  to  signahze  them- 
selves: And  it  being  requisite  that  they  should  all  bear  different  things  to  be 
known  by,  that  great  variety,  among  such  a  number  of  commanders,  was  very 
agreeable  by  the  variety  of  crests,  which  were  taken  for  some  particular  cause 
and  motive;  and  accordingly  they  had  some  mysterious  signification,  to  express 
some  remarkable  action,  or  other  notable  thing  appertaining  to  their  family  or 
country. 

Our  historians  have  mentioned  some  solemn  tournaments  holden  with  us  in  the 
reign  of  Alexander  II. ;  and  much  about  the  time  that  the  English  solemnized 
them  in  the  reign  of  Richard  I.  where  I  doubt  not  but  the  armorial  shields  of 
knights  were  then  trimmed  fashionably,  as  those  of  France  and  Germany. 

Old  seals  apppended  to  evidents,  especially  those  called  sigilla  imagims,  do  repre- 
sent the  dresses  of  knights  of  old,  having  the  image  of  the  owner  in  a  military 
dress,  fashionable  to  the  times,  most  frequently  on  horseback,  brandishing  a  sword 
by  the  right  hand;  on  tlie  left  arm  the  shield,  and  on  the  head  a  helmet,  ensigned 
with  his  crest  or  cognizance,  for  which  called  an  equestrian  seal.  The  other  side,  or 
reverse,  called  sigilium  armorian,  which  contains  the  shield  of  arms  without  any  em- 
bellishments, and  sometimes  trimmed  with  exterior  ornaments.  A  few  of  which. 
shields  I  shall  here  mention,  appended  to  evidents  and  authentic  deeds.. 

Equestrian  seals  were  first  used  by  great  men  represented  on  horseback,  having 
their  shields  of  arms  on  their  left  arm,  and  their  heads  covered  with  helmets, 
mantlings,  wreaths,  and  crests;  which  trimmings  came  afterwards  to  timbre  the 
shield  of  arms. 

As  for  the  ancient  use  of  them  with  us,  I  shall  begin  with  Sir  James  Balfour, 
Lyon  King  at  Arms  in  the  reign  of  King  Charles  I.  who,  in  a  manuscript  of  Ex- 
terior Ornaments,  said  to  be  written  by  this  author,  the  use  of  which  manuscript  I 
had  from  Balfour  of  Denmiln,  a  near  relation  of  his,  and  have  a  copy  of  it  by  me, 
says,  in  his  12th  chap.  "  That  after  all  the  enquiry  and  search  he  could  make  for 
"  old  seals  in  Scotland,  he  could  find  no  seal  timbred  with  helmet  and  crest,  till 
"  the  reign  of  King  David  I.  except  one  which  belonged  to  Gilchrist  Earl  of 
"  Angus,  who  lived  in  that  king's  reign,  and  had  on  his  helmet  a  flourishing 
"  branch  of  a  palm  tree;  which  seal  was  appended  to  a  charter  of  his  to  the  mo- 
"  nastery  of  Dunfermline.  And  near  about  that  time,  says  our  aathor,  the  Earl 
"  of  Sutherland  had  on  his  seal  a  shield  of  arms  timbred  with  a  helmet,  and 
"  thereupon  for  crest  a  cat  salient,  which  is  carried  to,  this  day  by  the  family." 
William  de  la  Haya,  (one  of  the  progenitors  of  the  Earls  of  Errol,  High  Constable 
of  Scotland)  his  seal  of  arms  appended  to  a  charter  of  donation,  granted  by  him 
of  the  lands  of  Ederpnllis  en  le  Carss,  to  the  abbacy  of  Cupar,  (which  donation 
was  confirmed  by  King  Wilham,  in  the  7th  year  of  his  reign)  had  the  shield  of 
arms  of  Elay,  as  now  carried,  tin.bred  with  a  helmet,  and,  for  crest,  a  falcon  volant: 
But  it  seems  there  were  no  supporters,  otherwise  our  author  had  not  omitted  them. 

He  tells  us  also  of  Sir  Williasi  Wallace,  Governor  of  Scotland  under  John 
Baliol,  the  then  pretended  king,  who  had  on  his  seal  a  shield  of  arms  timbred  with 
a  helmet,  and,  for  crest,  a  swan's  head  couped,  appended  to  a  grant  of  his,  thus: 
"  WiUielmus  Wallace,  miles,  custos  regni  Scotia;  sub  Joanne  rege,  &  cum  con- 
'■  sensu  communitatis  ejusdem  regni,  dedisse  oflicium  Constabularitatis  Jacobo 
■'  Scrymgeour  de  Dudop,  militi  regis  vexillario  :"  He  likewise  gives  the  seal  of 
Sir  James  Douglas,  the  Flower  of  Chivalry,  having  his  shield  of  arms  timbred  with 
a  helmet,  and,  for  crest,  a  bird.     He  lived  in  the  reign  of  Robert  I. 

I  have  seen  the  armorial  seal  of  James  Earl  of  Douglas  and  Marr,  Lord  of  the 
barony  of  Cavers,  handsomely  embellished,  appended  to  a  charter  of  his  of  the 
date  the  27th  of  July  1389,  where  his  arms  were,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  a 
man's  heart,  and  on  a  chief  three  stars  for  Douglas;  second  and  third  a  bend 
betwixt  six  cross  croslets  fitched,  for  Marr,  timbred  with  a  helmet  and  hachements, 
and  wreaths ;  and,  in  place  of  a  crest,  topped  with  a  plume  of  feathers :  the 
achievement  was  supported  with  lions  gardant,  and  at  their  backs  a  tree  growing, 
all  within  a  pale  of  wreathed  wood.  In  the  year  1442  there  was  a  judicial  tran- 
lumpt  of  this  charter  taken  before  the  Abbot  of  Melrose,  with  the  description  of 
the  seal  by  a  notary,  which  1  thought  fit  to  insert  here,  and  is  as  follows,  "  Charts. 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  i^ 

"  bon«  meaioriffi  domini  Jacobi  comitis  de  Douglas  &  de  Mair,  ac  doniiiii  h:i- 
"  ronias  de  Cavers,  cum  i>ao  vera  sigillo,  rotundo  in  cera  rubra  alb-x  impressa, 
"  modo  chartarum  penden.  sigillatum,  in  ciijus  quidem  sigilli  rotunditate  sen  cir- 
"  cumferentia  sculpebantur  htec  verba,  sigillum  Jacobi  comitis  de  Douglas  St- in- 
"  fracircumferentiam  sculpebaturclvpeu:.  trianguhiris,  St  supra  dictum  clypeum  le 
"  timrale,  S^-  qui'dam  bosca  de  pluniis,  &  ex  utraque  parte  ijusdem  clypei  qua;dam 
"  arbor  cum  ramis.  Dictus  vero  clypeus  gestus  erat  cum  bestia  sylvestri,  ad  mo- 
"  dum  leonis  seu  leopardi ;:  &•  intra  dictum  clypeum  bculpcbuntur  tres  stellulae  & 
"  unum  cor,  &-  in  intima  parte  idem,  &•  in  secunda  fci  iniima  parte  sculpebantur 
"  sex  cruciuncuL-E,  vulgariter  diet,  croyslets  cum  Ic  band  in  medio  eorundem;  &- 
"  in  duabus  superioribus  partibus  dicti  clypei  erat  sculptura  facta  modo  contrario 
"  ad  inferiorem  sculpturam."  The  last  words  import  what  heralds  say,  first  quarter 
and  fourth  the  same,  second  and  third  the  same,  being  all  counterposed  in  quartered 
bearings.  I  have  added  tliis  bla/on  for  its  antiquity  given  us  by  a  common  no- 
tar.  If  he  had  begun  with  a  description  of  the  shield  before  he  had  begun  with  the 
outer  parts,  it  had  been  better. 

Let  this  instance  be  sufficient  for  the  practice  of  our  nobility  having  their  hel- 
mets adorned  with  plumes  of  feathers  (instead.of  other  things)  for  their  crests, 
which  was  agreeable  to  the  practice  of  other  nations,  who  had  feathers  only  for 
their  crests ;  as  Lipsius  observes,  "  Nescio  quo  naturEe  ductu,  ubique  terrarum  fere 
"  bellatores  hoc  affectant,  orientales  passim  atque  etiam  rudes  isti  in  novo  orbe,  et 
"  majores  nostri  et  hinc  insignia  ista  familiarum  varia  quibus  superbimus."  And 
Polybius,  speaking  of  the  exterior  ornaments  as  we  are  doing,  says,  "  Prncter  ha;c 
"  omnia  adorantur  corolla  plumea,  pennisque  puniceis,  albis  &-  nigris,  erectis 
"  longitudine  fornia:  cubitalis,  quae  in  summo  vertice  ca:teris  armis  addide- 
"  lint.  " 

The  ostrich  feathers,  most  glorious,  were  more  desired  and  sought  after  than 
others,  for  embellishing  the  helmets  of  great  men. 

The  cognizance  and  device  of  the  Princes  of  Wales  is  a  coronet  adorned  with 
these  feathers,  since  the  battle  of  Cressy  in  France,  where.  Edward  the  Black 
Prince  of  Wales  took  it  from  the  head  of  John  King  of  Bohemia  fighting  for  the 
French.  And  such  feathers  became  also,  with  some  variation  in  their  tinctures, 
3.  device  to  other  sons  of  the  royal  family  of  England ;  of  which  before  in  the 
First  Part  of  this  System. 

The  tufts  and  plumes  of  feathers  in  old  books  of  tournaments  were  called  plum- 
ailes  or  plumars,  says  Menestrier,  and  were  placed  in  pipes,  which  rose  from  the 
top  of  the  helmet,  frequently  to  be  seen  on  the  old  helmets  of  the  Germans,  as  also 
these  of  the  Dukes  of  Savoy ;  and  these  pipes  have  been  by  some  writers  taken  for 
pillars. 

The  Gern  ans  of  old,  and  at  this  time,  have  their  helmets  adorned  with  the 
wings  of  birds,  called  voles,  with  the  figure  of  some  animal,  a?  also  with  winding 
horns,  which  they  used  in  tournaments,  and  sometimes  with  high  caps  called 
spiteboods,  ordinarily  of  the  tincture  of  the  arms,  and  charged  with  the  proper 
figures  after  the  partitions  of  the  field,  as  parti,  coupe,  tranche,  taille,  and  quarterly 
cheque,  and  h%engy,  paly,  and  bendy  ;  as  may  be  seen  in  their  books  of  arms. 

But  to  return  more  particularly  to  crests,  which  were  sooner  used  upon  the  hel- 
met of  the  chevalier  in  battle,  and  afterwards  on  heads  of  their  images  in 
equestrian  seals,  and  then  upon  the  helmets,  which  timbres  now  the  shield, 
both  with  us,  the  English,  and  other  nations,  of  which  I  shall  add  here  a  few 
instances. 

I  have  observed  no  crests  on  the  equestrian  seals  of  our  ancient  kings,  but  on 
their  heads,  helmets,  and  on  their  crowns :  Neither  are  there  any  crests  to  be 
found,  as  1  am  informed,  upon  the  seals  of  the  kings  of  England,  till  Edward  III. 
who  began  his  reign  1327.  "  And  as  he  was  the  first  king,"  says  Sandford  in  his 
Genealogical  History  of  England,  "  that  quartered  the  arms  of  France  and  Eng- 
"  land  in  one  shield;  so  he  was  the  first  that  used  a  crest,  viz.  a  lion  passant  gar- 
"  dant,  crowned  upon  a  chapeau,  with  which  his  figure  on  horseback  was  adorn^- 
"  ed,  as  on  his  royal  seal. " 

The  first  crest  to  be  met  with  on  the  seals  of  the  Earls  of  Flanders,  (given  us  by 
Olivarus    Uredus  de  SigiUis  Camitum  Flaudriee')  with  whom  arms  were  in   high 


14  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

esteem,  is  that  of  Philip  Earl  of  Flanders,  where  he  is  represented  in  armour  on 
horseback,  supporting  by  his  right  hand  a  square  banner,  whereon  was  depicted 
the  hon  of  Flrtuders,  and  on  his  left  arm  a  shield  with  the  same  lion,  and  upon  the 
top  of  the  helmet  on  his  head,  for  crest,  a  demi-hon.  Which  seal  of  arms  was  ap- 
pended to  an  evidence  of  his  in  the  year  iioi. 

One  of  his  successors  Robert  Earl  of  Flanders,  had  on  his  .seal,  in  the  year 
1104,  his  own  picture  in  armour  on  horseback,  holding  by  his  left  arm  the  shield 
of  arms  of  Flanders,  the  helmet  on  his  head  adorned  with  a  capeline  or  manthng 
uncut,  upon  which  stood,  for  crest,  a  dragon  ;  and  another  like  unto  it  was  placed 
upon  the  head  of  his  horse  :  on  the  reverse,  or  other  side  of  his  seal,  was  the  es- 
cutcheon of  his  arms,  neither  trimmed  with  crown,  helmet,  mantling,  or  crest. 
His  successor  Lodovick  Cressiacensis  Earl  of  Flanders  1329,  had  a  lion  seiant, 
between  two  horns,  for  a  crest,  on  the  equestrian  side.  And  his  son  and  successor 
Lodovick  Maleanus  Earl  of  Flanders,  anno  1.346,  had  not  only  for  crest  the  Hon 
upon  the  equestrian  side,  but  on  the^  other  side  or  reverse  a  shield  couche,  charged 
with  the  lion  of  Flanders,  and  timbred  with  a  helmet  and  capeline  ermine,  and 
upon  it  a  demi-vole  for  crest  :  And  upon  another  seal  of  his  in  the  year  1382,  there 
is  a  lion  seiant,  holding  the  escutcheon  of  Flanders,  with  its  head  in  a  helmet  (in 
place  of  that  which  timbres  the  shield)  and  thereupon  a  crown  relevate  with 
flowers,  and  issuing  out  of  it  a  demi-lion  between  two  voles  for  crest.  And  this  is 
the  first  practice  of  timbring  escutcheons  with  helmet,  capelines,  crowns,  and 
crests,  upon  the  seals  of  the  Earls  of  Flanders. 

As  for  the  ancient  seals  of  the  nobility  in  Scotland,  one  side  of  them  for  the 
most  part  were  equestrian,  long  before  they  timbred  their  escutcheon  of  arms 
with  the  above-mentioned  ornaments  ;  of  which  I  shall  give  three  or  four  in- 
stances. 

On  a  seal  of  Rolland,  Constable  of  Scotland,  he  is  there- represented  on  horse- 
back in  armour,  with  a  sword  in  his  right  hand,  and  on  his  left  arm  a  shield 
charged  with  a  cheveron ;  which  figure  was  also  on  the  caparisons  of  his  horse, 
before  and  behind.  This  seal  was  appended  to  a  charter  of  his,  wherein  he  is 
designed  RoUandus,  Jilius  Uthredi  const ahularius  regis  Scotorum,  granted  to  Allan 
Sinclair,  and  Matilda  his  spouse,  of  all  the  lands  which  William  Morville,  gave  to 

them :  which  charter  is  in  the  custody  of Sinclair  of  Herdmanston,  Dr,. 

of  Medicine. 

I.  have  seen  several  seals  of  the  ancient  Earls  of  Dunbar  and  March,  appended 
to  evidents  and  charters ;  as  that  one  belonging  to  Patrick  Earl  of  Dunbar,  v/ho 
married  Ada,  daughter  to  King  William,  granted  by  him  to  the  abbacy  of  Mel- 
rose :  which  seal  had  but  one  side  after  the  equestrian  form,  a  man  in  armour  on- 
horseback,  holding  in  his  right  hand  a  sword,  and  on  his  left  arm  a  shield  charged 
with  a  lion  rampant,  within  a  bordure  charged  with  roses.  His  grandson  Patrick 
Earl  of  Dunbar  had  such  another  equestrian  seal  in  the  year  1251,  with  this  vari- 
ation, that  the  arms  of  Dunbar,  as  above  blazoned,  were  also  on  the  capari- 
sons of  his  horse  ;  and  on  the  back  of  the  seal,  or  reverse,  was  the  impression  of  a 
lesser  seal,  having  a.  shield  charged  with  a  lion  rampant,  and  the  legend  round,  Si~ 
giUum  Annorum. 

His  successor  Patrick  Earl  of  March  and  Dunbar,  v/ho  lived  in  the  reign  of 
King  Robert  I.  had  only  a  plain  shield  on  his  seal  of  arms,  viz.  a  lion  rampant, 
within  a  bordure,  charged  with  eight  roses,  without  helmet,  crest,  or  any  other 
exterior  ornaments. 

The  first  of  this  family  who  had  a  shield  of  arms  timbred,  was  that  of  George 
Earl  of  March  Lord  Annandale  and  Man,  with  a  helmet,  and  for  crest,  issuing 
out  of  a  wreath,  the  head  and  neck  of  a  horse  bridled  ;  the  supporters  of  these  arms 
were  two  lions  seiant,  and  behind  them  two  trees  :  which  seal  was  appended  to  a 
charter  of  his  of  the  lands  and  wood  of  Sorrowlsfield  to  the  abbacy  of  Melrose,  the 
8th  of  May  1400.  These  charters  and  seals  1  did  see  in  the  custody  of  Mr  David 
Simson,  Historiographer  for  Scotland,  who  told  me  he  had  them  from  the  Earl  of 
Morton's  charter-chest. 

Thomas  Randolph,  who  married  a  sister  of  King  Robert  the  Bruce,  on  his  seal 
of  arms  appended  to  a  donation  of  six  merks  out  of  the  lands  of  Redpath,  to  the 
monks  of  Melrose,  to  say  prayers  for  the  soul  of  Alexander  III.  was  only  a  shiekl' 

I 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS,  15 

charged  with  three  cushions,  without  any  other  exterior  ornaments.  His  son 
Thomas  EaiL  of  Muiikay,  Lord  ^Vnnandale  and  Man,  had  his  shield  ot'arms  as  his 
fatlier,  without  any  exterior  ornaments.  Which  two  seals  of  arms  were  placed 
upcn  a  compartment  like  a  rose,  and  are  supposed  to  be  si^illa  piivata,  their  pri- 
vate seals,  which  are  nut  trimmed  so  as  then-  great  seals.  Six  James  Balfour,  in 
his  foresaid  manuscript,  says,  "  That  lie  has  seen  the  seal  of  this  Thomas  Earl  of 
"  Murray,  nephew  to  Kuig  Robert  I.  which  had  the  arms  of  Randolph,  a  shield 
"  charged  with  tbrc»e  cushions  witlvn  a  double  tressure,  flowered  and  counter- 
"  flowered,  the  shield  timbred  with  helmet,  raantlings,  and  wreath,  out  of  the  last 
"•  issued  a  demi-lion  gardant.  " 

Roger  Quincy  Earl  of  Winchester  in  England,  who  came  to  Scotland  in  the 
reign  of  King  William,  and  obtained  great  possessions,  being  Higii  Constable  there 
in  ri.^ht  of  his  wife,  the  eldest  daughter  of  Allan  of  Galloway,  Constable  of  Scot- 
land, granted  several  charters,  one  of  which  1  have  mentioned  in  the  First  Part  of 
this  System,  to  Sccher  de  Seaton,  to  which  is  appended  his  seal  in  red  wa.x,  with 
two  sides  ;  the  face  is  equestrian,  having  a  man  in  armour  on  horseback  brandish- 
ing a  sword,  and  on  his  left  arm  a  triangular  shield,  charged  with  seven  mascles, 
three,  three,  and  one,  and  had  the  same  figure  on  the  caparisons  of  his  hor^e,  and 
below  its  belly  a  winged  dragon,  with  these  words- round  the  seal,  Sis'il.  Rogeii  dc 
^li/icY  comitis  H'incestrite.  On  the  other  side  of  the  seal,  called  the  reverse,  is  a 
man  standing  in  a  coat  of  mail,  with  a  sword  in  his  right  hand,  and  supporting  a 
long  triangular  shield  by  his  left,  with  the  foresaid  figures,  being  in  a  posture  as  if 
he  were  combating  with  a  lion  erect,  having  his  two  fore  paws  on  the  shield,  and 
below  his  hinder  feet  a  rose  ;  the  man's  head  and  face  being  covered  with  a  close 
helmet,  ensigned  with  a  circular  diadem,  but  not  adorned  with  flowers;  upon  which 
stands  a  dragon  with  wings  and  tail  nuved  for  crest ;  and  the  legend  round,  Sigil- 
lum  Rogeri  de  ^lincy  constabularii  Scotia:  which  charter  and  seal  is  in  the  Earl  of 
W^inton's  charter-chest :  the  charter  has  no  date.  This  Roger  is  said  by  our 
historians  to  have  died  in  the  year  1264  :  and  on  the  account  of  his  relation 
with  the  family  of  Seaton,  it  is  thought  that  that  family,  being  dignified 
with  the  title  of  Earl  of  Winton,  carries  the  same  dragon  which  Qumcy  used  for 
crest. 

Sandford,  in  his  Genealogical  History  of  England';  gives  us  the  seal  of  arms  of 
Thomas  Earl  of  Lancaster,  who  died  in  the  reign  of  Edward  II.  on  which  he  is 
represented  on  horseback,  in  his  coat  of  mail,  with  the  surcoat  of  his  arms ;  upon 
his  helmet  stands  a  wiveron  or  dragon  for  his  crest,  and  from  it  lambrequins. 
Our  author  says,  "  This  is  the  first  crest  and  mantle  he  obsened  in  the  royal  fa- 
"  mily  of  England,  his  horse  being  also  caparisoned  with  his  arms,  Viz.  gules,  three 
"  Wons  passant  gardant  or,  the  wiveron  being  also  fixed  on  the  head  of  his  horse. 
"  His  seal  had  also  a  reverse,  upon  which  was  a  large  shield  charged  with  the  said 
"  three  lions,  and  a  label  of  five  points."  But  this  shield  was  not  timbred  with 
helmet,  mantling,  and  crest,  as  afterwards.  For  our  author  tells  us  in  his  fore- 
cited  book,  "  That  the  first  shield  he  observed  timbred  with  helmet,  mantling,  and 
crest,  was  that  of  Thomas  Mowbray,  who  was  made  Earl  of  No  ttingh-VM  by  King 
Richard  II.  per  juncttiram  gladii ;  and,  by  patent.  Earl  Marshal,  the  12th  of  Fe- 
bruary 1382,  being  the  fir^t  Earl  Marshal  of  England  ;  those  befortr  him  were 
only  marischals,  without  that  title  of  dignity  :  And  afterwards  upon  the  29th  of  Sep- 
tember 1397,  he  was  advanced  by  the  same  king  to  the  dignity  of  Duke  of  Nor- 
folk. His  shield  of  arms  was  then  timbred  with  helmet,  mantlings,  and  cha- 
peau  ;  upon  which  stood  a  lion  yxiXM/i/jl^a/rfiW?,  gorged  with  a  duke's  cro.vn  for 
crest. 

If  this  be  the  first  practice  for  timbring  shields  of  arms  in  England,  the  practice 
has  been  sooner  with  us,  as  is  given  by  the  fore-mentioned  instance:.  I  shall  add 
another  well  known,  viz.  the  armorial  seal  of  John  Stewart  Earl  of  Carkick, 
eldest  lawful  son  of  Robert  High  Steward  of  Scotland,  who,  before  his  father  was 
king,  had  his  shield  ot  arms  timbred  with  a  helmet,  mantling,  and  wreath,  and 
upon  it  for  crest  a  demi-lion  :  Which  seal  was  appended  to  a  charter  of  his 
to  the  church  of  Glasgow,  in  the  year  1360;  and  his  seal  of  arms,  after  his 
father's  accession  to  the  crown,  was  not  only  timbred,  but  supported  by  two 
lions. 

Vol.  IL  Li 


x6  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

The  figures  of  animals  and  other  things  placed  upon  the  top  of  the  helmet  ot 
heroes  for  crest,  in  battle  or  in  tournaments,  were  made  of  pasteboard,  parchment, 
or  boiled  leather,  formed  and  illuminate  with  colours  suitable  to  the  things  they 
would  have  them  represent,  as  Columbier  tells :  And  that  sometimes  they  were 
made  of  timber  or  thm  uon ;  but  these  being  weighty,  they  were  more  frequently- 
made  of  the  foresaid  matter,  and  fixed  to  a  piece  of  leather,  which  was  also  fixed 
to  the  top  of  the  helmet,  and  which  leather  was  covered  with  the  capeline  or 
mantlings.  The  crests  of  the  Knights  of  the  Garter  set  upon  their  stalls  at 
Windsor,  Ashmole  says,  are  either  placed  upon  the  wreath,  or  on  a  crown  or 
ducal  cap  turned  up  with  ermine  ;  and  of  whatsoever  form  their  crests  be,  they 
are  neatly  carved  in  wood,,  and  either  gilt,  or  wrought  in  their  proper  colours- 
in  oil. 

When  placed  on  the  heads  of  heroes  they  look  straight  forward  ;  but  when, 
they  top  the  helmet  which  timbres  the  escutcheon,  they  follow  the  position- 
of  the  helmet  direct  forward  in  profile  or  side-ways ;  and  when  more  hel- 
mets are  on  a  shield  than  one,  they  look  to  one  another,  as  before  men- 
tioned. 

All  who  are  allowed  to  place  on  their  shield  of  arms  a  helmet,  may  adorn  it 
with  manthngs,  wreath,  and  crest ;  as  Sir  George  Mackenzie  in  his  Science  of  He- 
raldry, page  90.  For  men  choose  what  crests  they  fancy  ;  only  it  is  not  proper  to 
choose  such  things  as  could  not  stand,  or  be  carried  by  warriors  upon  their  hel- 
mets, as  balances  or  other  things,  which  cannot  either  stand  fixed,  nor  wave 
handsomely. 

I  proceed  to  give  account  of  crests,  whose  various  forms  depend  upon  the 
fancy  of  the  bearers,  who  made  choice  of  such  which  best  pleased  them  for  the 
time  ;  yet,  it  is  presumed,  many  has  assumed  crests  upon  divers  considerations,  of 
which  I  shall  add  some  from  the  practice  of  armories. 

Many  considerable  persons  have  taken  the  armorial  figure,  the  charge  within 
the  shield,  or  a  part  of  it  for  crest  ;  then  the  helmet  is  said  to  be  aniiet,  as  the  di- 
minutive of  the  arms  :  Generally  the  German  casques  are  so  armet ;  and  when  the 
crest  with  them  is  of  no  figure,  or  part  of  the  charge,  yet  that  it  may  show  forth 
the  tessera  of  the  family,  they  make  it  of  the  tinctures  of  the  field,  or  by  the  par- 
tition lines  of  the  arms  it  timbres. 

The  crest  of  Scotland  is  a  lion  (the  armorial  figure  of  the  kingdom)  seiant  full- 
faced  gules,  crowned  or,  holding  in  his  dexter  paw  a  naked  sword,  and  m  the  si- 
nister a  sceptre,  both  erected. 

That  of  England  is  a  leopard,  or,  as  they  call  it,  a  lion  passant  gardant  or,  be- 
cause three  of  them  are  the  armorial  figures  of  that  kingdom. 

The  Emperor's  crest  is  a  double  eagle  ;  the  Kings  of  France  have  a  flower-de- 
luce,  and  the  Kings  of  Castile  and  Leon,  a  castle  and  lion,  the  proper  charges  of 
their  imperial  ensigns  ;  so  that  their  helmets  are  armet,  as  the  French  say. 

The  helmets  of  subjects  are  often  ar?jiet  with  crests,  being  a  part,  or  the  haill,  of 
their  armorial  figure.  A  few  examples  1  shall  here  add ;  as  Home  Eaii  of  Home 
has  his  helmet  armet  with  a  lion's  head  erased  argent,  his  armorial  figure  being  a 
lion.  Ker  Earl  of  Roxburgh,  who  carries  in  his  paternal  coat  three  unicorns'  heads 
erased,  takes  one  of  them  for  a  crest ;  and  Ker  Earl  of  Lothian  has  for  crest  the 
sun  in  his  glory,  because  he  carries  the  same  in  his  coat  of  augmentation.  Seaton 
Earl  of  Dunfermline,  the  Earl  of  Melville,  and  the  Lord  Gathcart,  have  crescents 
for  their  crests,  which  are  the  armorial  figures  in  their  shields  ;  and  Forrester 
Lord  Forrester  has  a  hunting-horn,  having  three  for  his  arms.  Many  other  in- 
stances might  be  added,  which  1  omit  for  brevity's  cause. 

Sometimes  the  crest  is  a  part  of  one  or  other  of  the  supporters,  v>/hich  are  placed 
at  the  sides  of  the  shield  ;  as  that  of  Keith  Earl  Marischal,  who  carries  for 
crest  a  hart's  head  proper,  having  two  harts  for  supporters.  The  Earl  of  Lin- 
lithgow's crest  is  a  demi-savage  holding  a  batton,  his  lordship's  supporters  being 
two  savages  with  battons.  The  Earl  of  Wemyss  has  for  crest  a  swan,  and  for  sup- 
porters two  of  the  same.  Supporters  might  have  been  as  well  said  to  have  been 
taken  from  crests,  being  more  ancient  in  armories  than  supporters :  and  I  doubt 
not  but  some  have  been  so,  for  crests  have  been  used  in  armories  before  supporters. 
But,  in  a  general  way  of  speaking,  as  to  their  particular  forms,  and  shapes,  crests 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  17 

might  have  been  later  in  families;  for  every  one  may  alter  his  crest  as  he  thinks 
fit. 

The  armorial  figures  within  the  shield  are  not  all  fit  to  be  used  for  crests,  espe- 
cially the  honourable  ordinaries,  or  such  things  as  cannot  stand  fixed,  or  wave  with 
beauty  ;  in  which  case  they  are  necessitated  to  take  other  figures  tit  for  that  end  ; 
as  the  principal  family  of  the  name  of  SitWAKT  and  its  branches,  carrying  only  a 
fesse  cheque,  took  other  figures  for  their  crests ;  as  John  Earl  of  Cakrick  before 
mentioned,  he  and  his  predecessors  had  demi-lions,  or  lions'  heads  for  their  crest : 
The  Stewarts  Earls  of  Lennox  a  bull's  head:  Stewarts  Earls  of  Athol  a  wolf's 
head,  because  many  such  creatures  were  in  that  country  ;  and  the  SrEWARrs  Earls 
of  BucHAN,  a  garb,  the  armorial  figure  of  that  kingdom;  and  tiie  Stewarts  Earls 
of  Galloway  and  Murray  have  but  one  figure  for  their  crest,  viz.  a  pelican  feed- 
ing her  young,  but  with  difierent  mottos ;  and  the  Stewarts  of  Ochiltree,  for  crest, 
a  civet  cat. 

I  shall  here  mention  the  two  seals  of  Robert  Duke  of  Albany,  Earl  of  Fife  and 
Monteith,  brother  to  King  Robert  II.  which  I  have  seen.  Tlie  first  of  them  was 
appended  to  a  precept  of  his  to  the  abbacy  of  Melrose  26th  of  May  1399,  befiire  he 
was  made  a  Duke.  The  shield  of  this  seal  was  coucbe,  charged  with  a  fesse  cheque, 
and  surmounted  with  a  lion  rampant,  and  timbred  with  a  helmet  standing  forward 
and  open,  adorned  with  a  capeline,  and  upon  it  a  wreath  cheque  of  three  tracts, 
out  of  which,  for  crest,  issueth  a  wolf's  head  and  neck  with  an  arrow  s-ticking  in 
it,  and  holding  in  his  mouth  a  rose.  This  achievement  was  supported  by  two 
Y\ons  seiant  &nCi gardant.  His  other  seal,  when  Duke  of  Albany,  was  supported 
and  timbred  as  the  former,  with  this  alteration  only  within  the  shield,  tliat  it  was 
quartered  first  and  fourth,  a  lion  rampant ;  second  and  third,  a  fesse  cheque,  with 
such  a  wreath  as  the  former  with  the  crest  upon  it,  which  does  readily  show  to 
whom  the  crest  belongs. 

Noblemen  of  old,  in  the  solemnities  of  riding,  of  parliaments,  creation  of  nobility, 
and  other  solemn  meetings  and  processions,  were  in  use  to  have  their  badges,  be- 
ing their  crests,  embossed,  or  wrought  out  in  plate  of  gold  or  silver,  and  placed 
upon  their  servants'  coats  or  mantles,  being  of  silk :  And  since  these  solemnities 
are  in  desuetude,  their  crests  are  placed  on  their  silver  plates,  with  the  wreath 
and  motto,  by  which  silver  plates  or  seals  it  is  known  to  what  family  they  belong, 
though  their  shield  of  arms  be  not  there  placed.  Also  the  descendants  of  noble 
famihes  carry  the  crest  of  their  chief,  which  they  have  right  to  do,  as  well  as  their 
arms,  but  cannot  be  so  well  distinguished  by  tliese  badges  without  some  mark  re- 
lative to  their  descent ;  and,  they  not  being  willing  to  add  such  marks  of  cadency 
to  their  crests,  as  Sir  George  Mackenzie  observes,  they  choosed  rather  to  carry  dif- 
ferent crests,  which  is  the  reason  we  see  so  many,  vai'ious  crests  carried  by  gentle- 
men of  one  name  and  family.  I  am  of  opinion  the  vai'iety  of  crests  might  have 
been  prevented,  and  may  be  for  the  future,  by  placing  their  marks  of  caden- 
cy on  the  crests  of  their  families  from  which  they  are  descended,  and  which  has 
been  formerly  practised  by  some,  and  especially  by  the  princes  of  the  blood  royal, 
kings'  children,  brothers,  uncles^  and  nephews,  in  Scotland,  England,  and  France, 
who  not  only  carry  the  royal  arms,  but  their  crests,  with  their  marks  of  filiation ; 
and  even  the  natural  sons  of  kings  do  the  same,  having  their  marks  of  illegitima- 
tion,  or  placing  them  on  their  crests. 

No  other  subject  of  whatsoever  quality  is  allowed  to  carry  the  crest  of  a  sove- 
reign prince  without  licence  from  him.  Thomas  Mowbray  Duke  of  Norfolk, 
Earl  rvlar^hal  of  England,  by  concession  of  Richard  II.  of  England,  carried  the 
crest  of  England.  Howard  Duke  of  Norfolk,  as  descended  of  a  daughter  and 
heir  of  the  foresaid  Mowbray  Duke  of  Norfolk,  carried  the  royal  arms  marshalled 
■with  his  paternal;  and  for  crest  that  of  England  a  \:\on  passant  gardant  ^ules,  gorg- 
ed with  a  ducal  crown,  which  descended  to  his  successor  Thomas  Duke  of  Norfolk, 
and  his  son  Henry  Earl  of  Surrey,  who  w^re  arraigned  for  treason  upon  several  ar- 
ticles ;  one  of  which  was  for  quartering  and  using  arms  which  belonged  to  the  king 
and  prince,  which  the  Earl  justifying  that  they  pertained  to  his  ancestors,  by  the 
records  of  the  Herald  Office,  nevertheless  was  found  guilty,  and  executed  on  ToWer- 
hill,  by  order  of  Henry  VIII.  of  England  ;  as  Sandford,  in  his  Genealogical  History. 
This  family  afterv.-ards  being  reponed  to  fortune  and  honours,  carried  the  foresaid  ' 


i8  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

royal  ensign,  and  all  the  noble  branches  of  that  family  cany  them  also ;  as  ire 
Guillim's  Display  of  Heraldry. 

John  Duke  of  Lauderdale  obtained  a  special  warrant  from  King  Charles  II.  to 
bear  the  crest  of  Scotland,  with  a  flower-de-luce  in  the  sinister  paw  of  the  lion,  in 
place  of  the  sceptre :  And  others  before  him,  for  special  services  to  the  king  and  king- 
dom, have  been  rewarded  with  pieces  of  the  sovereign's  achievementtobe  their  ciests  ; 
as  John  Ramsay  Viscount  of  Haddington,  and  Earl  of  Holderness  in  England, 
carried,  by  royal  permission,  for  his  crest,  the  device  of  Scotland,  viz.  a  thistle  vertr 
ensigned  with  an  imperial  crown  or  :  And  the  honourable  family  of  Cunningham 
Earls  of  Glencairn  have  been  in  use,  for  a  long  time,  to  carry  for  crest  an  uni- 
corn's head  couped  argent,  horned  and  maned  or,  being  the  head  of  the  royal  sup- 
porter of  Scotland.  As  also  Home  of  Wedderburn,  for  his  frequent  services  against 
the  English,  carries  the  same,  with  the  addition  of  being  gorged  with  an  open 
crown,  as  in  the  royal  achievement,  as  may  be  seen  on  the  church  of  Dunglass 
(if  they  have  not  been  of  late  defaced)  whereof  he  the  said  Wedderburn. was  a 
founder,  with  the  Earl  of  Home's  progenitors  ;  as  also  on  the  frontispiece  of  the 
House  of  Wedderburn,  and  on  a  seal  of  arms  in  custody  of  his  progenitor  Sir  David 
Home  of  Wedderburn,  appended  to  a  discharge  of  his  to  Sir  Alexander  Home  of 
that  Ilk,  the  27th  of  January  1443. 

The  Barons  of  Craigmiller,  of  the  name  of  Preston,  were  in  use  of  old  to  have 
for  crest  an  unicorn's  head  and  neck  gorged  with  an  open  crown,  and  issuing  out 
of  a  ducal  one  in  place  of  a  wreath  ;  which  is  still  to  be  seen  on  the  gate  of  ths 
House  of  Craigmiller,  timbring  the  arms  of  Preston. 

These  then  that  have  not  their  crests  from  any  part  of  the  sovereign  achieve- 
ment, or  their  own,  take  other  figures  that  best  pleases  the  assumers. 

Some,  to  show  their  alliance  to  honourable  families,  do  take  for  crest  that  which 
best  fits  their  design  ;  as  that  used  by  the  Earl  of  Strathmore,  being  the  bust  of 
a  lady,  holding  in  her  right  hand  the  thistle  of  Scotland,  and  surroimded  with  a 
circle  of  laurel,  in  memory  that  one  of  the  family  married  King  Robert  II.  his 
daughter,  of  whom  they  are  descended. 

Bethune  of  Baltbur,  upon  the  account  of  marrying  with  the  heiress  of  Balfour  of 
that  Ilk,  not  only  quarters  the  Balfour's  arms  with  their  own,  but  also  used  their 
crest,  viz.  an  otter's  head  erased. 

Crests  are  sometimes  assumed  to  perpetuate  some  eminent  action  done  by  their 
progenitors  or  themselves.  Dalziel  Earl  of  Carnwath  hath,  for  crest,  a  sword  in 
pale,  to  perpetuate  a  martial  deed  of  one  of  his  progenitors  ;  of  which  story  be- 
fore. 

The  Lord  Somzrville  has  had  for  crest,  of  old,  a  monstrous  creature  like  a  dra- 
gon, spouting  out  fire  before  and  behind,  standing  on  a  wheel,  upon  the  account 
(as  the  story  goes)  that  John  Somerville  Baron  of  Linton  in  Teviotdale,  (one  of  the 
progenitors  of  this  noble  family)  in  the  reign  of  King  William,  killed  a  monstrous 
destructive  creature  in  Teviotdale,  by  a  little  fiery  wheel  at  the  end  of  a  spear ; 
and  which  crest  has  continued  still  in  the  family. 

The  crest  of  Kikrpatricil  of  Closeburn  is  a  hand  couped,  holding  a  bloody  dagger 
in  pale,  upon  the  account  that  his  progenitor  Roger  Kirkpatrick,  who  stood  early 
tor  the  interest  of  Robert  the  Bruce,  killed  dead  his  enemy  John  Cumin,  to-named 
Red,  in  Dumfries  church  ;  and  using  a  motto  relative  thereto,  /'//  make  sicker. 

Sir  William  Scott  of  Thirlstane,  baronet,  or,  a  bend  azure,  charged  with  a  mullet 
pierced  betwixt  two  crescents  of  ths  first,  within  a  double  tressure  flowered  and 
counter-flowered  of  the  second.  Which  arms  are  timbred  with  helmet  and  mant- 
lings ;  and  upon  a  wreath  of  his  tinctures  has  for  crest  a  mural  crown,  and  issuing 
thereout  six  horsemen's  banners  or  spears,  with  pennons  thereat,  three  and  three 
disposed  in  saltier,  with  the  motto.  Ready  ay  ready,  with  suitable  supporters,  as  in 
the  15th  Plate  of  Achievements,  Vol.  I. 

King  James  V.  was  pleased  to  honour  John  Scott  of  Thirlstane,  a  gentleman  of 
entire  loyalty,  for  his  frequent  and  ready  services  to  his  Majesty,  with  a  special 
concession  of  a  part  of  the  royal  ensign,  the  double  tressure,  and  other  suitable 
figures,  to  adorn  his  armorial  bearing,  which  I  have  seen  under  his  Majesty's 
hand,  and  the  subscription  of  Sir  Thomas  Erskine  of  Brechin,  secretary,  which  I 
have  caused  insert  in  the  First  Volume  of  this  System,  page  97.  And  a  genea- 
1 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  19 

logical  account  of  this  family  is  to  be  seen  in  the  Appendix  annexed  to  this  vo- 
lume. 

Sometimes  crests  are  taken  to  represent  the  offices  and  employments  of  the 
bearers. 

The  chancellors  of  France  adorn  their  arms  ordinarily  with  the  proper  crest  of 
office,  being  the  figure  of  a  woman  representing  France,  holding  by  lier  right  hand 
'a  sceptre,  and  by  the  left  the  great  seal  of  the  kingdom. 

The  old  Earls  of  Dunbar  and  March,  who  were  hereditary  keepers  and  wardens 
of  the  marches  of  Scotland  and  England,  from  which  they  had  the  title  of  March, 
had  always,  for  crest,  a  horse-head  bridled,  to  show  their  readinesss  in  prosecuting 
out-fang  and  in-fang  theft.  The  Lords  Johnsxons,  now  Mafquis  of  Annandale, 
as  wardens  of  the  West  Marches  of  Scotland  with  England,  took,  for,  crest  a  spur 
with  wings,  to  show  their  readiness.  And  in  Annandale,  Jardine  of  Applegirth, 
an  ancient  Family,  who  joined  with  the  Johnstons,  has  a  spur-rowel  for  crest. 
Others  in  civil  employments  have,  for  crest,  the  chief  instruments  of  their  trades, 
as  writing-pens  carried  by  clerks  and  writers,  to  show  their  rise  by  these  employ- 
ments;  of  such  I  have  given  several  instances  in  the  First  Volume  of  this  System 
from  the  Lyon  K.egi:,ter. 

Crests  are  sometimes  assumed  as  relative  to  the  name  and  designation  of  the 
assumers.  Cock.b'j.in  of  that  Ilk,  a  cock;  Craw  of  Heugh-head,  a  craw;  Roch- 
HEADS  of  Craigleith  and  Innerleith,  the  head  of  a  man  in  profile  all  rough  or 
hairy:  And  such  practice  is  used  abroad  by  the  Ursini  in  Italy,  who  carry  a  demi- 
bear  for  crest,  in  allusion  to  the  name :  And  some  have  crests  relative  to  their  de- 
signation, as  by  the  Scotts  Earls  of  Buccleugh,  and  by  the  present  dutchess,  a 
buck's  head  erased,  proper ;  and  Ross  Lord  Ross  of  Halkhead,  a  falcon's  head 
erased,  relative  to  his  title. 

Such  as  change  their  arms  upon  just  and  honourable  grounds  retain  ordinarily  a 
figure  of  their  old  arms  for  their  crest,  to  show  their  descent  from  the  original 
house.  Thus  the  Dukes  of  Brunswick,  now  known  by  the  title  of  Prince  Elector 
of  Hakover,  carried  the  wild  horse  for  their  crests  in  their  old  arms  for  West- 
phaha:  But  now,  as  I  showed  before,  since  King  of  Great  Britain,  ingrafts  by  way 
of  ente  the  Westphalia  horse  in  the  arms  of  Great  Britain. 

The  Counts  of  Thoilouse  carried  anciently  a  sheep,  which  they  use  now  for 
their  crest,  having  got  new  arms,  viz.  gules,  a  cross  clechi,  vitide,  and  poniette  or. 

The  family  of  Colonnta,  which  formerly  earned  a  mermaid  for  their  arms,  has 
now  a  pillar,  and  the  old  figure,  the  mermaid,  for  their  crest. 

The  Bruges  of  Skelton,  in  England,  carried  for  arms  argent,  a  lion  rampant 
azure;  and,  when  one  of  the  family  married  the  heiress  of  Annandale  in  Scotland, 
laid  aside  his  paternal  coat,  and  carried  only  those  of  his  lady,  viz.  or,  a  saltier  and 
chi&i gules,  but  retained  the  old  figure,  the  lion,  for  a  crest;  as  by  Bruce  Earl  of 
Elgin,  and  many  ancient  families  of  that  name  with  us,  who  have  the  lion,  the 
old  figure  of  the  name,  for  crest. 

Stewart  Earl  of  Traqliair,  to  show  his  descent,  has  a  garb  for  crest,  as  come 
of  the  Stewarts  Earls  of  Buchan;  and  some,  to  show  their  maternal  descent,  take  a 
figure  from  their  maternal  coat  for  crest ;  as  Seaton  of  Touch  has  a  boar's  head 
couped  or,  (the  figure  of  Gordon)  being  descended  of  Sir  Alexander  Seaton,  and 
his  lady  the  heiress  of  Gordon  of  that  Ilk.  And  the  same  practice  is  in  England, 
where  Sturton  Lord  Sturton  has  for  crest  a  monk  in  a  Franciscan  habit,  holding 
in  his  right  hand  a  scourge,  or  whip,  carried  formerly  by  the  surname  of  Monk, 
whose  heiress  one  of  the  progenitors  of  the  Lord  Sturton  married ;  and  from  them 
descended  the  family  of  Sturton. 

Though  these  instances  make  crests  to  appear  to  be  hereditary  and  necessary  to 
all  the  descendants,  as  well  as  arms,  yet  this  science  and  its  rules,  by  the  practice 
of  all  nations,  has  allowed  a  freedom  to  change  their  crests,  and  alter  them  after 
the  fancy  and  circumstances  of  the  bearers,  being  but  an  ornament  of  coats  of 
arms,  and  so  more  of  the  nature  of  a  device  than  a  fixed  settled  piece  of  hereditary 
armorial  bearings.  Hence  it  is  we  see  so  many  families  of  one  stock  and  name 
use  different  crests,  to  show  their  inclinations  upon  several  accounts,  as  before 
mentioned. 

Vol.  II.  K  k 


20  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

We  find,  as  before  observed,  that  most  part  of  crests  used  by  the  ancient  heroes, 
and  since  by  knights  in  their  exercises,  in  tournaments,  and  other  festivals,  from 
which  the  use  of  timbring  arms  proceeded,  were  nothmg  anciently  but  the  devices 
and  marks  of  gallantry  and  love,  as  Faulus  Jovius  tells  us;  who  likewise  says, 
"  That  when  Charles  VIII.  and  Lewis  XII.  of  France  marched  into  Italy  with 
"  glorious  armies,  the  French  officers  being  then  fond  of  devices,  and  to  distinguish 
'■  their  companies,  adorned  ensigns  and  banners  with  such ;  which  amused  the 
"  Italians,  who  fell  in  love  with  such  figures,  and  afterwards  improved  them  to 
"  greater  perfection  than  any  other  nation,  under  certain  nice  rales  and  prescrip- 
"  tions ;  and  so  laid  the  foundation  of  the  curious  science  of  devices,  in  which  they 
"  excel."  I  am  not  to  treat  of  that  science  here,  being  out  of  my  road,  but  of 
armorial  mnttos  v/hich  adorn  arms. 


C  H  A  P.     VI.       , 

or  MOTTOS,  CRIES  OF  WAR,  AND  DEVICES. 

THESE  three  are  often  taken  for  one  another  in  this  science,  and  all  called 
devices;  but  to  distipguish  them,  I  shall  treat  of  them  separately  in  this  chap- 
ter, and  here  to  speak  briefly  of  them. 

Mottos  and  cries  of  ixar  consist  of  a  word  or  words  without  any  figure;  and  the 
device  here  mentioned  is  a  figure  without  a  word,  being  a  representation  and  em- 
blem, or  hieroglyphic,  painted  to  express  something  that  is  to  be  kept  in  mind; 
and  these  were  much  in  use  among  the  Egyptians,  and  other  ancient  nations. 
The  word  without  a  figure,  and  the  figure  without  a  .word,  are  looked  upon  as 
imperfect  devices;  but  when  the  word  and  figure  are  joined  together,  making  an 
allusion,  to  show  the  inclination  and  humours  of  the  assumers,  or  of  something 
done,  or  to  be  done,  though  they  be  not  easily  understood  by  the  vulgar,  ars 
perfect  devices,  consisting  of  a  body  (the  figure)  and  soul  (the  word),  as  heralds 
say. 

These  were  much  used  in  former  ages,  and  in  later  times  they  are  more  used, 
with  the  addition  of  a  motto  to  explain  the  signification.  Great  and  curious  men 
have  been  in  use  to  have  them  embroidered  or  painted  on  their  furniture  of  military 
and  civil  dignities,  and  on  their  seals  accompanying  their  armorial  achievements, 
for  which  heralds  reckon  them  amongst  the  ornaments  of  armories ;  so  that  I  shall 
treat  of  them  separately  here,  with  some  few  remarkable  instances,  which  will  not, 
I  liope,  be  disagreeable  to  the  reader. 

Motto  is  an  Italian  word  signifying  verhum,  that  is  the  word  or  saying  which 
gentlemen  carry  in  a  scroll  under  or  above  their  arms;  it  is  likewise  Latined  dictum, 
a  saying,  from  whence  comes  our  old  word  ditton;  as  in  our  ancient  books  of 
blazon  of  arms.  Camden,  for  motto,  says  inscriptio  ;  and  some  calls  it  epigraplj, 
because  mottos  are  often  of  many  words,  which  make  proverbs,  witty  and  religious 
sentences,  most  frequently  relative  and  explanatory  to  the  name  and  arms  of  the 
owners,  and  may  be  used  by  any  person  who  has  right  to  carry  arms. 

When  they  have  no  relation  to  the  name  and  aims  of  the  owners,  nor  to  the 
crests,  they  are  then  proper  mottos,  and  cannot  be  called  devices;  of  which  I  shall 
add  a  few  instances.  The  family  of  Bourbon,  in  France,  has  the  word  Esperaiice, 
Hope;  the  House  of  Nevers,  Fides:  With  us  the  Duke  of  Gordon  has,  for  motto, 
Bydand;  the  Duke  of  Argyle,  Ne  obliviscaris ;  the  Marquis  of  Tweeddale,  Spare 
naught;  Dundas  of  that  Ilk,  Kssayez;  Innes  of  that  Ilk,  Betraist;  Home  of  Wed- 
derburn,  the  word  Remember;  and  so  of  many  others  such  like  instances  that  have 
no  relation  to  the  name,  or  any  part  of  the  arms  of  the  bearer,  are  to  be  found  in 
our  old  records  of  the  arms  of  the  nobility  and  gentry,  who  have  made  choice  of 
these  mottos,  to  express  their  predominant  passions,  either  of  piety,  love,  or  war, 
or  upon  some  adventure  befallen  them ;  and  those  short  expressions  having  had 
aome  such  original,  have  been  made  hereditary  in  many  families. 

However,  mottos  for  the  most  part  are  relative  to  some  part  of  the  achievement, 
and  especially  to  the  crest;  and  from  them  arises  a  comparison,  the  one  explaining 
the  other,  and  so  make  a  proper  device;  as  by  these  following  instances.     The  an- 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  ;i 

cient  motto  of  the  Earls  of  Sutherxand,  IVithout  fear,  speaks  to  the  crest,  a  wild 
cat  sitting. 

yirescil  vtilnere  virtus,  the  motto  or  ditton  of  S  thwart  Earl  of  Galloway,  is  re- 
lative to  the  crest,  a  pelican  vulnered  feeding  her  young  in  a  nest,  proper;  which 
figure  is  an  emblem  of  our  Saviour:  And  the  same  figure,  for  crest,  the  SrEWARrs 
Earls  of  Murray  use,  with  the  motto,  Sulus  per  Christum  redemptorem.  The  Mar- 
quis of  Seaforth's  crest  is  a  mountain  in  flames,  with  the  motto,  Luceo,  non  uro,  I 
shine  and  not  burn ;  which  ditton  is  used  by  Mackenzie  Earl  of  Cromarty,  and 
applied  to  his  crest,  the  sun  in  his  splendor. 

The  motto  Dyead  God,  relative  to  a  hand  holding  a  thunderbolt,  by  Carnegic 
Earl  of  SouTHESK. 

Gray  Lord  Gray  has,  for  crest,  an  anchor,  proper;  with  the  motto,  Anchor,  fast 
anchor. 

Elphinston  Lord  Balmerino's  crest,  a  dove  ardent,  crowned  or,  its  feet  en- 
vironed with  a  snake,  proper;  motto,  Prudentia  fraudis  nescia.  Honesty  knows  no 
guile. 

M'Kay  Lord  Rae  has  the  words  Manuforti,  By  the  hand  of  a  strong  man;  and, 
for  the  figure,  a  hand  holding  a  sword,  proper. 

Arbuthnot  Viscount  of  Arbuthnot  has  the  words  Laus  Dea;  to  his  crest,  a 
peacock's  head  and  neck,  proper:  ARBUrHSioT  of  Eiddes  to  a  peacock  passant, 
proper,  has  these  words,  Tarn  interna  quam  externa,  to  intimate  that  he  desires  to 
be  both  beautiful  within  and  without:  And  Arbutilntot  of  Findowrie,  lias  for  motto. 
Interna  prestant,  to  the  same  figure. 

In  cruce  sains,  a  frequent  motto  used  upon  account  of  religion,  as  by  those  of 
the  name  of  Abercromby,  with  a  cross  for  tlie  figure  :  But  Abercromby  of  Glass- 
haugh  has  for  motto,  1/ive  ut  vivas.  Live  that  ye  may  live,  relative  to  a  bee  volant, 
proper:  And  the  same  figure,  the  bee,  has  Beatson  of  Kilrie  for  crest;  with  the 
motto.  Cum  prudentia  sfdulus:  Ayton  of  that  Ilk,  in  Fife,  a  hand  pulling  a  rose, 
proper;  with  the  motto,  Decerpta  dabuiit  odorem,  as  other  families  of  that  name. 

Douglas  of  Caver's  motto,  Do  or  die;  crest,  a  dexter  hand  holding  a  broken 
lance  in  bend.  Di^ummond  of  Hawthornden's  crest,  a  pegasus,  proper,  maned  and 
winged  or;  with  the  motto,  Hos gloria  reddit  honores. 

Drummond  of  Blair,  for  crest,  a  nest  of  young  ravens,  proper:  motto,  Beus pro- 
videbit,  God  will  provide. 

Drummond  of  Innermay's  crest,  a  hand  holding  a  flaming  heart ;  with  the  motto, 
Loyal  an  mort. 

Many  more  such  instances  I  could  give,  but  refer  the  reader  to  tlie  sculptures 
in  the  plates  of  the  First  and  Second  Volume  of  this  System;  and  shall  add  more 
instances  upon  different  accounts. 

All  Europe  over  some  mottos  are  assumed  to  relate  to  the  name  of  the  bearers. 

The  family  of  Campi,  in  Placenza,  have  the  words  of  the  xcvi.  Psalm,  Gaude- 
bunt  campi,  et  omnia  quie  in  lis  sunt,  i.  e.  Let  the  fields  be  joyful,  and  all  that  is 
therein. 

The  family  of  My-pont,  in  Burgundy,  has  for  motto,  Mv-pont  difficile  a  passer, 
i.  e.  My  bridge  is  hard  to  be  passed. 

Vere  Earl  of  Oxford,  in  England,  had  for  motto,  Vero  nihil  verius,  i.  e.  Nothing 
truer  than  l^'ere;  said  by  some  to  have  been  pronounced  by  Queen  Edizabeth  in 
commendation  of  the  loyalty  of  that  family. 

Conqueror  of  Frierton  has  the  word  I'ictoria,  i.  e.  Victory,  relative  to  his 
name. 

Calder  of  Liniger,  Vigilans  non  cadet. 

Mottos  are  assumed  also  to  show  the  origin  of  the  bearers,  either  from  the  father 
or  mother's  side;  As  the  M'Intoshes  of  that  Ilk,  Captains  of  Clan-Chatton,  have, 
for  crest,  a  cat  salient,  proper;  with  the  motto.  Touch  not  the  cat  but  in  glove;  as 
descended  from  the  Catti,  by  the  mother's  side,  a  German  people,  who  came  to 
Scotland,  and  said  to  have  carried  the  said  figure:  And  tlie  Maci'hersons,  as  a 
branch  of  the  Clan-Chattons,  have  the  same  crest  and  motto;  for  which  see  Ap- 
pendix, page  44. 

Stewart  of  Phisgall,  as  descended  of  John  Stewart,  who  married  the  heiress  of 
Bonkill,  in  the  shire  of  Berwick,  and  had  buckles  for  her  armorial  figure,  has,  for 


aa  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

crest,  a  demi-lion,  holding  in  his  dexter  paw  a  buckle  or;  with  the  motto,  Suffibu- 
lattis  majores  setjiior. 

Balnaves  of  Carnbody  has,  for  crest,  a  hand  holding  a  football;  with  the  motto, 
Hinc  origo,  i.  e.  From  thence  my  rise:  because  the  first  of  this  name  (being  for- 
merly called  Naves)  playing  at  the  football  before  the  king,  who  cried,  Well  balled 
Naves,  took  the  surname  Balnaves. 

Mottos  do  also  perpetuate  great  and  glorious  actions  of  a  family ;  as  that  crest 
and  motto  of  the  Scrymceours  of  Dudop,  a  lion's  paw,  holding  a  sword,  proper: 
motto.  Dissipate ;  from  one  of  the  ancestors  of  this  family,  who  defeat  the  kings' 
enemies.     See  Appendix. 

Some  families  of  the  name  of  Crawfurd  have,  for  motto,  Tutum  te  robore  redclam, 
i.  e.  I'll  save  thee  by  strengtli ;  to  perpetuate  the  seasonable  action  of  one  of  the 
progenitors  of  the  name,  who  opportunely  relieved  King  David  I.  when  dismount- 
ed from  his  horse  by  the  stroke  of  a  deer,  when  hunting  near  Edinburgh,  where  the 
abbey  of  Holyroodhouse  now  stands;  and  a  deer's  head,  with  a  cross  betwixt  his 
horns,  became  the  ensign  of  that  abbacy,  and  all  the  baronies  belonging  to  it,  as 
the  Canongate,  S^c.  As  also  the  armorial  figure  of  the  Crawfurds  descended 
from  the  above  Crawfurd. 

Crawfurd  of  Jordanhill,  descended  of  Captain  Thomas  Crawfurd,  a  younger  son 
of  Crawfurd  of  Kilbirnie,  (which  family  carries  a  fesse  ermine  for  arms)  who  sur- 
prised and  took  in  the  impregnable  castle  of  Dumbarton,  the  2d  of  April  1571, 
took,  for  crest,  a  castle;  with  the  motto,  Expugjiavi. 

Alexander  Earl  of  Stirling,  having  planted  Nova  Scotia,  took,  for  motto.  Per 
mare  et  terras. 

Ramsay  Viscount  of  Haddington,  upon  his  happy  rescuing  King  James  VI. 
from  the  bad  attempts  of  the  Earl  of  Gowrie,  and  his  brother,  whom  Ramsay  killed, 
took,  for  motto,  Hcec  dextra  vindex  principis  et  patria. 

Ogilvie  of  Barras,  who  had  a  main  hand  in  the  preservation  of  the  regalia  of 
Scotland,  till  King  Charles  II.  his  Restoration,  took  then,  for  motto,  Praclarum 
regi  et  regno  servitium. 

Mottos  are  sometimes  taken  to  perpetuate  events  and  accidents  of  famihes :  Thus 
the  Lord  Maxwell,  being  forfeited,  and  thereafter  restored,  took,  for  motto,  Re- 
viresco,  I  stand  in  awe  to  otfend.     Mackenzie's  Heraldry. 

Mr  David  Watson  of  Sauchton  having  recovered  these  lands  by  purchase,  after 
they  had  been  sold  by  his  progenitors  upwards  of  a  hundred  years,  upon  recovery 
of  them,  took,  for  motto,  Insperata  floruit,  relative  to  a  branch  sprouting  out  of  an 
old  stock  of  a  tree,  his  crest. 

Mottos  are  also  assumed  to  show  offices  and  employments:  Thus  the  Lord  John- 
ston, of  old,  when  Warden  of  the  West  Marches,  had  these  words.  Light  thieves  all ; 
that  is,  Light  from  your  horses,  and  render  yourselves;  and  since  dignified  with 
the  title  of  Earl  of  Annandale,  the  family  use,  for  motto,  Nunquam  non  paratus,  i.  e. 
Always  ready. 

These  of  the  name  of  Forrester  have  ordinarily,  for  motto.  Blow  Hunter  thy  honi. 
Severals  who  have  risen  to  honour  and  fortune  by  their  employments,  such  as  no- 
taries and  writers,  as  I  have  observed  before,  have  taken  writing-pens  for  their 
crest,  and  mottos  apposite  thereto,  to  show  their  fidelity  and  sedulity  in  their  em- 
ployments: As  Mr  Robert  Alexander  of  Boghall  took,  for  motto,  Fide7n  serva: 
And  Sir  James  Elphinston  of  Craighouse,  Sedulitate. 

Some  mottos  relate  neither  to  the  crests  nor  figures  within  the  shield,  but  to  the 
supporters ;  As  that  of  the  House  of  Buccleugh  have  the  word  Amo ;  their  sup- 
porters, two  women  in  rich  apparel. 

The  Earl  of  Rothes's  motto  Grip  fast,  alludes  to  his  supporters,  two  griffins. 

Carnegie  Earl  of  Northesk  has,  for  supporters,  two  leopards  spotted,  proper; 
and,  for  motto,  Tache  sans  tache. 

The  mottos  relative  to  crests  are  placed  above  them  upon  escrols,  which  sur- 
mount the  achievement ;  when  they  relate  or  speak  to  supporters,  they  should  be 
placed  upon  the  compartment  on  which  the  supporters  stand;  which  the  reader 
may  see  in  the  sculptures  of  achievements  in  the.  First  and  Second  Volumes  of  this 
System,  of  which  I  shall  mention  an  example,  the  achievement  of  Sir  John  Lauder 
of  Fountainhall,  one  of  the  Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice,  who  has,  for  crest,  a 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENT.-^.  23 

tower  argent,  masoned  sabU\  and  a  man  looking  over  the  embattlcracnts;  and,  for 
motto,  relative  to  it,  upon  an  escrol,  Tunis  prudctitia  custos;  and  below  the  achieve- 
ment, upon  the  compartment,  on  which  stand  the  supporters,  these  words,  Ut  mi- 
graturus  hahita. 

When  there  are  three  mottos,  or  more,  they  are  disposed  about  the  parts  of  the 
achievement  to  which  they  relate;  as  those  which  adorned  the  achievements  of  the 
Earl  of  Winton's crest,  a  dragon,  proper,  spouting  out  fire;  and  above  it  an  escrol, 
with  the  motto.  Hazard  zit  fordwnrd:  And  upon  another  escrol,  which  passes  over 
the  middle  of  the  supporters,  and  behind  the  middle  of  the  shield,  are  these  words, 
(relative  to  the  blazmg  star  in  svntont)  Intaminatis  ftilget  homribiis;  and,  on  the 
compartment,  whereupon  stands  the  supporters,  (as  relative  to  them)  luvia  virti/ti 
via  nulla;  as  in  the  Plate  of  Achievements,  Vol.  I. 

The  Spaniards  have  another  method  of  placing  their  mottos  within  the  shield, 
bordure-ways,  of  which  I  have  seen  severals,  and  shall  here  mention  only  that  of 
the  Archbishop  of  Tarragon  in  Spai.'i,  whose  name  was  John  Tereys,  who  car- 
ried, for  arms,  a  lion  rampant  holdmg  a  cross;  and  round  the  lion  were  these  words, 
for  his  device,  Hiijus  virtute  omnia. 

The  Popes  do  the  same  on  their  seals  of  lead,  where,  on  the  one  side,  are  the 
heads  of  St  Peter  and  St  Paul  offronte  ;  and,  on  the  other  side,  a  shield  quarterly ; 
in  the  first  quarter,  the  words  Sanctus  Petrus,  .in  the  second,  Sanctus  Paulus;  and 
in  the  other  two  quarters  the  names  of  the  present  Pope;  and  round  these  quarters, 
bordure-ways,  the  device  of  the  present  Pope,  being  ordinarily  a  short  sentence  or 
vei-se  taken  from  the  Scripture  when  he  is  elected. 

Having  treated  I  think  sufficiently  of  mottos  and  devices  as  private  epigraphs,  1 
shall  proceed  to  public  ones,  viz.  cries  of  'war. 

Cries  of  War  were  well  known  of  old  by  the  ancients,  and  much  in  request,  1 
may  say,  by  all  nations;  by  the  French  called  cris  de  guerre,  and  with  us  called 
slughorns.  These  have  a  great  affinity  with  mottos  and  devices,  and  many  times 
are  taken  for  one  another;  so  that  the  cry  has  become  mottos  to  ancient  families. 

Cries  of  war  consist  ordinarily  of  three  or  four  words,  called  by  the  Italian  Syl- 
vester Petra  Sancta,  cLunor  miHtaris.  It  belonged  anciently  to  none  but  to  so- 
vereign princes,  dukes,  earls,  great  barons,  and  chiefs  of  potent  famihes,  who  had 
the  command  of  troops  of  men ;  by  which  cry  they  gathered  them,  led  them  on  to 
battle,  and,  when  distressed  or  put  to  confusion,  did  rally  them. 

Menestrier  says,  "  That  those  who  had  right  to  carry  a  banner  w  ith  the  cry  of 
"  war,  were  taken  for  great  gentlemen,  who  used  them  not  only  in  real  fights, 
"  but  in  tournaments,  where  the  heralds  not  only  blazoned  their  arms,  but  pro- 
"  claimed  their  cries  before  them  that  they  might  be  known j  as  in  xh&  formula  of 
"  the  tournaments  of  Shovanncy  in  the  year  1282." 

These  cries  are  either  taken  from  the  name  of  the  chief  commander  of  troops, 
from  the  place  where  they  are  to  meet  and  rendezvous,  or  from  the  figure  on  the 
banner  or  standard. 

As  for  the  first,  the  cry  of  the  family  of  Bourbon,  w"as  Bourbon;  and  other  great 
families  besides  the  name  added  some  eulogium,  to  show  their  best  qualities;  as 
the  cry  of  the  Counts  of  H.aikault,  Hainault  the  Noble;  the  Duke  of  ]\1ilan, 
Milan  the  J'aliant ;  and  the  King  of  Armenia,  cried  Armenia  the  Noble  King.  With 
us  the  cry  of  the  old  Earls  of  Douglas  was,  A  Douglas,  a  Douglas,  which  was  very 
formidable  to  their  enemies  who  had  found  their  valour. 

Cries  from  the  place  of  rendezvousing  were  frequent  with  us  ;  as  that  of  the 
Homes.  A  Rome,  A  Home,  intimating  the  meeting  at  Home  Castle  ;  the  Macken- 
ziES  have  for  cry,  Tullochdar;  the  Clan-Chattons,  Craig-gow,  or  Craig-owie;  and 
the  Gr.^nts,  Ci  aig-ellachie,  &-c.  which  were  cries  taken  from  the  places  where  those 
clans  do  rendezvous,  and  proclaimed  through  their  countries  by  such  as  were  ap- 
pointed carrying  a  cross  of  wood  burnt  at  the  end,  called  "n  fiery  cross;  upon  which 
all  the  vassals  and  dependents  met  at  the  respective  places  of  their  clans  ;  and 
the  cry  continued  in  their  expeditions,  and  in  action  to  distinguish  their  different 
troops. 

Cries  or  w.ir  have  been  taken  from  the  names  of  patron  saints ;  as  the  kings  of 
Scotland  had  St  Andrew  ;  the  Kings  of  England,  St  George  ;  the  Dukes  of  A.n- 
jou  cried  St  Maurice;  and  the  Kings  of  France  Montjoye  St  Dennis.     Severals  have 

Vol.  11.  L  1 


^4  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

endeavoured  to  explain  this  cry  ;  some  calling  it  a  joy,  as  Moult  Joy ;  some  Latin 
it,  vieum  gaudium  ;  others,  as  Matthew  Paris,  montis  gaitdhm. 

'Menestrier,  in  his  Treatise  of  Exterior  Ornaments,  calls  it  a  cry  of  rallying,  and 
signifies  nothing  but  the  standard  of  St  Dennis,  which  the  ancient  kings  of  France 
did  carry  in  their  wars  ;  and  montjoye,  in  old  French,  signified  a  mount  or  heap  ot~ 
stones  gathered  together,  for  directing  the  high-ways  from  place  to  place,  with 
crosses  set  upon  them,  especially  in  the  way  from  Paris  to  St  Dennis,  and  are  still 
called  the  montjays  of  St  Dennis ;  so  that  the  cry  of  France  signifies  nothing  but 
the  banner  of  St  Dennis,  after  which  the  army  marched,  and  to  it  rallied.  The 
Dukes  of  Burgundy,  who  had  the  image  of  St  Andrew  on  his  cross  upon  their 
ensigns,  cried  also,  montjoye  St  Andrew ;  and  the  Dukes  of  Bourbon,  who  had  the 
image  of  St  Mary  on  their  ensigns,  cried,  montjoye  notre  da?ne. 

This  author,  in  his  former  treatise,  gives  us  several  sorts  of  cries  of  war,  of  which 
1  shall  mention  a  few.  First,  These  of  resolution,  assumed  by  those  who  undertook 
I  he  holy  war,  cried  Dicu  le  veut,  i.  e.  God  willeth  it.  Cries  of  invocation,  such  as 
that  of  the  Lords  of  Montmorencv,  Dieu  aide  au  premier  Crestien,  i.  e.  God  assist 
the  first  Christian,  upon  account  the  family  was  the  first  Christian  one  in 
France.  Ashmole,  on  the  Institutions  of  the  Garter,  says,  "  That  the  kings  of 
•'  England  cried,  montjoye  notre  dame  St  George,  having  the  images  of  the  Virgin 
•'  Mary  and  St  George  on  their  standards."  This  author  likewise  observes  in  the 
fore-mentioned  book,  page  189,  "  That  Edward  III.  of  England,  at  a  skirmish 
"  near  Calais  1349,  had  for  his  cry,  ha  St  Edward,  (meaning  the  Confessor)  ha 
"  St  George. 

Menestrier  gives  us  cries  of  exhortation  ;  as  that  of  the  emperor's,  a  dextre  et  a 
sinistre,  to  exhort  the  soldiers  to  fight  valiantly  on  the  right  and  left  hand.  For 
cries  of  rallying,  he  gives  that  of  the  Counts  of  Flanders,  au  lion,  for  the  soldiers 
to  follow  or  rally  to  the  standard,  upon  which  was  the  lion  of  Flanders.  And  our 
author  says,  that  montjoye  St  Dennis  was  just  another.  And  Barry,  a  French  he- 
rald, observes,  all  the  great  men  in  France  had  for  their  cries,  montjoye,  who  carried 
flower-de-luces.  And  hence  the  word  montjoye  is  become  the  name  of  the  princi- 
pal Herald  of  France. 

Cries  of  wars  are  ordinarily  placed  as  mottos  upon  escrols  above  the  crest ;  as 
that  of  France,  at  this  time,  is  placed  over  the  pavilion  of  the  arms  of  France ; 
as  also  that  of  the  Dukes  of  Lennox,  avant  Darnly,  ever  since  the  old  cry  became 
the  motto  of  the  family.  Many  old  families  with  us  and  abroad  use  their  old  cries 
in  place  of  mottos,  having  no  use  for  them  of  late,  the  way  of  fighting  being  al- 
tered; so  that  now  they  are  only  marks  of  greatness  and  power,  and  continued 
for  the  antiquity  and  honour  of  families.  So  much  then  for  the  devices  which 
consist  only  of  words.  I  shall  proceed  to  devices  of  figures,  which  have  no  word  or 
words,  many  of  them  being  initial  letters  of  the  name,  and  others  of  them  figures, 
with  pious  sentences  added  to  explain  them. 

Sovereigns  have  been  for  a  long  time,  and  are  yet  in  use  to  place  at  the  sides  of 
their  shields  of  arms,  on  their  coins,  the  initial  letters  of  their  names;  as  our  kings 
of  the  name  of  James  had  J.  R.  at  the  sides  of  their  shields  ;  Queen  Mary  M.  R. 
and  for  Charles  C.  R.  The  kings  of  France  of  the  name  of  Charles  had  the  let- 
ter K,.  at  the  side  of  their  shields  ;  and  the  four  Henrys  had  the  letter  H.  and 
these  of  the  name  of  Lewis  the  letter  L.;  which  letters  were  ensigned  with  crowns. 

The  family  of  the  Hotmans  in  Paris,  place  the  letter  H.  on  the  collars  of  their 
supporters,  being  lions. 

The  ancient  device  of  the  house  of  Guise,  was  an  A.  within  a  circle,  which,  as 
Menestrier  says,  signifies,  chacun  a  son  tour,  i.  e.  every  one  to  his  turn.  The  let- 
ter P.  the  Mark  of  the  Pope,  and  that  letter  surmounted  with  a  saltier  cross, 
the  mark  of  a  martyr,  as  pro  Christo.  The  superscription  which  Pilate  caused 
place  upon  the  cross  of  the  Holy  Jesus,  was  the  device  of  Constantine  the  Em- 
peror upon  his  signs  and  banners,  as  Menestrier. 

The  device  of  the  Order  of  the  Jesuits  consists  of  the  letters  J.  H.  S.  Jesus 
bominum  salvntor ;  and  when  the  addition  of  the  three  passion-nails,  and  a  cross 
are  added  to  them,  they  are  then  the  complete  ensign  of  that  society. 

The  Emperor  Frederick  III.  took  for  his  device  the  five  vowels  of  the  alphabet, 
\,  E,  I,  O,  U,  interpreted,  Jquila  est  imperium  orbis  uaiversa-. 


KXTERIOR  ORNx\.MENTS.  2^ 

The  device  of  Savoy  consists  of  four  letters,  F,  E,  R,  T,  which,  by  some,  signi- 
fies, Fortitudo  ejus  Rhodum  teni/it,  i.  e.  liis  bravery  preserved  Rhodes.  Others  say 
these  letters  import,  that  his  motto  or  cry  was,  J'rapprz,  entrez,  rompez  tout,  i.  e. 
beat,  enter,  break  all,  which  Amadeus  of  Savoy  took  with  the  white  cross  for  hi'^ 
device  when  he  assisted  the  knights  of  Rhodes  against  the  Turks. 

The  family  of  Felix,  in  Piedmont,  have  for  their  device  three  F's,  to  signify, 
Felices  fuerunt  fideles,  i.  e.  the  Felices  were  faithful,  because  they  stood  tirm  and 
loyal  for  Amadeus  Count  of  Savoy,  anno,  11.^1,  when  all  Piedmont  revolted  from 
the  Count  except  the  town  of  Rivoli,  in  which  the  family  was  the  most  consider,- 
able;. 

Devices  which  consist  only  of  figures  without  words,  are  the  same  with  the 
hieroglyphics  and  emblems  used  by  tlie  ancients,  of  old,  to  signify  their  minds,  con- 
ceptions, and  intentions ;  and  from  such  came  orriginally  crests,,  and  other  armorial 
figures  placed  on  the  shield  above,  or  at  the  side  of  it,  some  being  temporary,  and 
others  of  a  longer  duration. 

The  thistle,  an  old  device  carried  by  the  Kings  of  Scotland,  and  after  assumed 
by  the  Dukes  of  Bourbon,  in  France,  the  foses  in  England  by  the  houses  of  Yok.k. 
and  Lancaster,  the  fusile  by  the  Dukes  of  Burgundy,  the  porcupine  and  salaman- 
der by  the  Kings  of  Fr..\nce,  weie  properly  their  devices ;  whose  intentions  and 
significations  at  first  were  not  well  known,  till  afterwards  opposite  words  and  sen- 
tences were  applied  to  them,  and  were  ordinarily, placed  at  the  sides  or  below  the 
shield  :  as  the  caltrapes  of  the  Earls  of  Perth,,  the  salamander  of  Dundas  of  that 
Ilk,  the  thistle  and  rose  in  his  Majesty's  achievement  issuing  out  of  the  compart- 
ment, the  known  devices  of  Scotland  and  England  united  in  the  person  of  King 
James  VI.  Before  which  time,  Henry  VII.  of  England,  representer  of  the  House 
of  Lancaster,  joined  the  red  rose  of  Lancaster  with  the  white  one  of  the  House  of 
York,  and  placed  them  below  his  shield  of  arms  issuing  out  of  the  compartment, 
to  show  the  incorporate  union  of  these  two  families,  by  his  marrying  Elizabeth  the 
heiress  of  York  ;  so  that  the  device  of  England  was  then  a  rose  parted  per  pale,  ^ules 
and  argent.  This  king  had  also  at  the  side  of  his  shield  of  arms,  for  a  device,  a 
portcullis,  to  show  his  descent  by  his  mother  fi-om  the  family  of  Beaufort ;  to 
which  he  added  these  words.  Altera  securitasy  meaning  thereby,  tliat  as  the  port- 
cullis, the  device  of  the  Duke  of  Somerset,  the  eldest  son  by  the  third  wife  of 
John  of  Gaunt  Duke  of  Lancaster,  fourth  son  of  Edward  III.  is  an  additional  se- 
curity to  a  gate  or  porch  of  a  fort,  so  his  descent  from  his  mother  strengthened  his 
other  title ;  and  from  this  device  he  instituted  a  pursuivant  by  the  name  of  Portcullis. 

The  portcullis  has  been  a  device  used  by  our  kings  since  King  James  I.  of  that 
name  in  Scotland  ;  as  may  be  seen  on  the  old  buildings  and  m  .dais  of  our  kings' 
bouses,  since  the  marriage  of  the  said  king  with  Jane  Beaufort,  eldest  daughter  of 
John  Earl  of  Somerset,  eldest  son  of  John  of  Gaunt  Duke  of  Lancaster,  fourth 
son  of  Edward  III.  and  righteous  heiress  of  the  House  of  Lancaster;  as  Sir  George 
Mackenzie  observes  in  his  discourse  concerning  the  three  unions,  page  25.  to  show 
their  maternal  descent  from  the  royal  family  of  England. 

Since  1  have  fallen  in  v«th  the  devices  of  the  royal  family  of  England,  which 
were  very  frequent  upon  the  pretension  of  the  Houses  of  York  and  Lancaster  to 
that  crown,  I  hope  my  reader  will  not  be  offended  (since  they  adorned  their 
achievement  with  such  devices,  which  obscurely  intimate  their  intents  and  de- 
signs) to  give  a  short  account  of  them  witli  tlieir  several  accessions  to  the  crown. 

The  tore-mentioned  John  of  Gaunt,  Duke  of  Lancaster  (in  the  reign  of  Richard 
II.  who  had  no  issue)  pretended  a  right  to  the  crown,  and  that  before  the  house 
of  York  ;  He  placed  at  each  side  of  his  achievement  an  eagle  standing  on  a  pad- 
lock, essaying  to  open  t^e  same,  intimating,  that  by  the  king  of  birds  he  would, 
force  oft  his  fetters  of  subjection;  for  which  see  Sandford's  Genealogical  History  of 
England,  who  gives  us  his  arms  in  sculpture,  with  that  device  adorning  his  achieve- 
ment. His  son  and  successor  Henry  (surnamed  Bolingbroke,  from  the  place  he 
was  born)  Duke  of  Lancaster,  before  lie  usurped  the  crown,  under  the  title  of 
Henry  IV.  in  a  combat  (allowed  by  Kin-  Richard  IL)  with  Mowbray  Duke  of 
Norfolk,  appeared  in  his  armorial  hereditary  ensigns,  with  devices  accompanying 
them  being  swans  and  antelopes.  The  Duke  of  Norfolk,  on  the  other  hand,'  ap- 
peared with  his  armorial  ensigns,  being  lions  and  mulberry  trees  as  rebuses  to  t!ir 


zb  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

name  of  Mowbray ;  which  hving  creatures  became  the  supporters  of  the  descendants 
of  these  families.  And  here  it  may  be  observed,  that  the  word  lebuses  is  used, 
when  a  coat  of  arms  or  crest  alludes  to  the  name  of  the  bearer,  which  the  French 
call  parlantcs,  and  the  English,  canting  arms. 

Edmond  Duke  of  York-,  fifth  son  of  King  Edward  III.  upon  his  brother  John 
Duke  of  Lancaster's  aspiring  to  the  crown,  took  a  figui'e  for  device,  resembling  that 
of  his  brother's  viz.  a  falcon  in  a  fetter-lock,  implying,  that  he  was  shut  up  from 
his  right  to  the  crown.  He  observing  his  sons  viewing  it  one  day,  asked  them, 
what  was  Latin  for  a.  fetter-lock?  who  returning  no  answer,  he  said, /.?/<:  bcec  hoc  tace- 
atis,  advising  them  to  be  silent,  for  God  knows  what  may  come  to  pass.  Which 
story  his  grandson  King  Edward  IV.  reported,  and  (as  Sandford  in  his  history)  com- 
manded his  younger  son,  Richard  Duke  of  York  to  use  that  device,  with  the  fet- 
ter lock  opened  ;  and  Camden,  in  his  Remains,  page  215.  says  the  same. 

Edward  IV.  the  first  of  the  house  of  York  that  ascended  the  throne  of  England, 
to  show  his  right  and  descent  to  the  crown,  used  several  devices  ;  as  the  white 
lion  of  the  Earl  of  March,  in  whose  right,  by  descent,  he  pretended  to  the  crown ; 
as  also  by  the  line  of  the  Burghs,  Earls  of  Ulster,  who  have  sometmies  used  a  dragon 
seiant  sable,  crowned  or,  the  cognizance  of  that  family ;  neither  did  he  omit  the 
device  of  the  house  of  Clare,  viz.  a  bull  sable  hoofed  and  horned  or,  with  these 
words,  ex  honore  de  Clare,  upon  the  account  that  Elizabeth,  one  of  the  co-heirs  of 
Clare  and  earldom  of  Gloucester,  was  wife  to  John  de  Burgh,  and  mother  of  Wil- 
liam Earl  of  Ulster  :  and  to  complete  the  four  probative  proofs  of  his  noble  des- 
cent, he  used  also  a  white  hart  attired,  accoUed  and  unguled  or,  standing  on  a  mount 
vert,  with  the  words,  ex  rege  Ricardo,  which  was  the  device  of  Richard  II.  taken 
from  that  of  his  mother  Princess  Jean  of  Kent.  This  King  Richard,  anno  1387, 
nominated  Roger  Mortimer,  his  successor,  who  was  grandfather  to  King  Ed- 
ward IV. 

Richard  III.  of  the  family  of  York  had  a  boar  for  his  device,  and  was  the  last 
king  of  the  House  of  York. 

Henry  VII.  of  the  House  of  Lancaster,  married  the  heiress  of  the  House  of  York; 
so  that  the  red  and  white  roses  (as  before)  were  united,  to  show  the  union  of  these 
two  houses;  and  besides  he  had  a  red  dragon  for  a  device,  which  was  used  by  Cad- 
wallader  the  last  king  of  the  Britons,  from  whom,  by  masculine  line,  he  derived 
his  pedigree ;  and  from  this  device  the  king  made  a  pursuivant,  called  Rouge  Dra- 
gon. 

Henry  VIII.  of  England,  son  of  Henry  VII.  bad  for  his  device  a  greyhound 
collared. and  courant,  to  show  his  descent  from  his  mother,  being  one  of  the  de- 
vices of  the  House  of  York  ;  and  used  also  a  red  rose,  a  flower-de-luce,  and  a  gol- 
den portcullis,  which  Sandford  calls  his  hereditary  devices  or  badges. 

His  daughter  Mary  Queen  of  England  had  a  red  and  white  rose  with  a  pome- 
granate knit  together,  to  show  her  descent  from  Lancaster  and  Spain.  But  our  au- 
thor tells  us,  that  afterwards  the  English  wits  began  to  imitate  the  French  and  Ita- 
lians in  their  devices,  by  adding  regular  mottos,  to  show  some  temporary  emer- 
gents ;  and  instances  that  of  Henry  VIII.  who,  upon  the  interview  he  had  in  France 
with  Francis  I.  and  the  Emperor  Charles  V.  as  arbitrator  in  accommodating  some 
difference  betwixt  them,  took,  for  device,  or  impress,  an  English  archer  in  a  green 
coi'.t,  drawing  his  arrow  to  the  head,  with  the  inscription  Cui  adhero  praest,  i,  e. 
He  to  whom  I  adhere  will  prevail. 

But  these  temporary  devices  or  impresses  being  the  subject  of  another  science, 
[  shaU  go  no  further  into  them,  and  advertise  my  reader  that  those  I  have  men- 
tioned of  a  longer  duration,  as  hereditary  cognizances  of  a  high  descent,  adorn 
the  achievements  of  noble  families,  and  frequently  become  the  supporters  of 
these  various  ones  which  attended  those  royal  achievements  of  England  1  have 
mentioned. 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  27 

CHAP.-  VII. 

OF  Sl'PPORTERS. 

THESE,  as  the  former  Exterior  Ornaments  which  I  have  been  treating  of,  were 
originally  only  ancient  devices,  which  by  custom  came  to  embellish  armorial 
ensigns,  and  formully  to  timbre  and  support  them,  from  which  they  are  generally 
called  supporters,  and  by  the  Latins  sustentacula,  from  their  holding  the  shield  :  If 
they  be  of  the  hgures  of  angels,  men  or  women,  they  are  called  lentnts  by  the 
French,  because  they' hold  the  shield  of  arms  in  their  natural  posture;  but  when 
the  shield  is  supported  by  the  figures  of  other  creatures,  such  as  beasts  and  fowls, 
as  hons,  bears,  horses,  iic.  eagles,  griffins,  falcons,  S^-c.  being  erect  and  out  of 
their  natural  posture,  they  are  called  properly  supporters  :  And  those  that  write  in 
Latin  want  not  their  fancy  in  calling  them  atlaiittdes,  from  the  fable  of  Atlas  sup- 
porting the  world ;  as  also  telamones,  because  painters  represent  Teiamon  currying 
his  mistress,  called  also  by  architects  Co/osses,  (I'ru.  Hero.)  '•  Colossi  isti  &-  susten- 
"  tacula  ahquum  onus,  quasi  in  sublimi  sustinentes,  nomen  acceperunt  ;"  for  sup- 
porting weighty  things  on  high  they  have  their  name.  But  tclainanes  may  be 
said,  as  some  will,  to  be  composed  of  these  two  words,  tdlus  et  homines,  (the  earth 
-and  men)  and  understood  for  giants  _/5/«  terra. 

When  inanimate  things  are  placed  at  the  sides  of  the  shield  by  way  of  sup- 
porters, the  English  call  them  cottises,  as  if  the  shield  were  cotised  with  them  ; 
which  word  the  English  bring  from  casta  the  ribs,  in  Guillim's  Display  ;  but  Sir 
George  Mackenzie  more  properly  from  the  French  Word  cote,  the  side;  and  for  such 
things  the  Latins  say,  stipaiites  latera  scuti. 

I  shall  here  add  what  the  ingenious  gentleman,  the  author  of  the  new  English 
Dictionary  of  Heraldry,  printed  in  the  year  1725,  says  in  the  title  of  Supporters: 
"  Things  placed  on  the  sides  of  the  achievements,  representing  sometimes  things 
"  living,  and  sometimes  dead  ;  but  these  of  some  blazoners  are  termed  supporters, 
"  whose  conceit  therein  I  can  hardly  approve,  quia  diversorum  diversa  est  ratio  ; 
"  and,  therefore,  the  blazon  that  I  would  give  unto  things  so  different  in  nature,  is, 
"  that  if  things  be  living,  and  seize  upon  the  shield,  then  shall  they  be  called  pro- 
"  perly  supporters,  and  if  they  are  inanimate,  and  touch  not  the  escutcheon,  then 
"  shall  such  arms  be  said  to  be  not  supported,  but  cottised  of  such  and  such  things ; 
"  for,  how  can  those  properly  be  said  to  support  that  touch  not  the  thing  said  to 
"  be  supported  by  them  ?  To  persons  under  the  degree  of  bannerets  it  is  not  per- 
"  mitted  to  bear  their  arms  supported,  that  honour  being  peculiar  to  those  that 
"  are  called  nobiles  miijores.  And  those  cottises  have  their  name  agreeable  to  the 
"  things  whose  quaUty  they  represent,  and  are  so  called  of  costa,  the  rib,  either  of 
"  man  or  beast ;  for  it  is  proper  to  the  rib  to  inclose  the  intrails  of  things  animal, 
"  and  to  add  form  and  fashion  to  the  body  :  In  like  manner  do  those  inclose  the 
"  coat-armour  whereunto  they  are  annexed,  and  do  give  a  comely  grace  and  orna- 
"  ment  to  the  same.  Having  heard  what  is  in  that  word  concerning  that  impor- 
"  tant  part  of  armory;  for  the  better  understanding  of  it,  here  shall  be  added  soine- 
"  thing  of  what  the  French  heralds,  who  were  masters  of  the  English,  say  to-  this 
"  purpose.  These  which  we  call  supporters  are  no  other  than  certain  animals, 
"  quadrupedes,  birds,  or  reptiles  ;  as  lions,  leopards,  dogs,  unicorns,  eagles,  grif- 
"  fins,  dragons,  and  several  others  placed  on  the  two  sides  of  the  escutcheons,  as 
"  if  they  were  appointed  to  guard  it,  supporting  and  liffing  it  up  with  their  paws  or 
"  claws.  Asforthe  tenents,  which  most  men  have  confounded  with  the  supporters,  tak- 
"  ing  them  for  the  same  thing.  I  find  this  difference,  that  the  supporters  hold  up, 
"  and  the  tenents  hold,  and  do  not  lift  up  the  escutcheon,  but  hold  it  under  their 
"  hands;  as  we  often  find  when  they  are  angels  or  human  creatures,  or  the  like. 
"  The  supporters  and  tenents  are  generally  taken  fi\)iTi  some  parts  of  the  coat- 
"  armour,  but  sometimes  are  quite  different  from  it,  there  being  nothing  to  oblige 
"  them  to  it." 

As  for  the  origin  and  first  use  of  supporters,  as  we  now  see  them,  there  are  dif- 
ferent opinions  :  First,  as  I  said  in  the  former  chapter  of  emblems  and  devices, 
they  were  placed  at  the  sides  of  the  escutcheons  by  the   owners,  to  show  some 

Vol.  U.  M  m 


28  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

mystical  meaning,  and  so  through  time  became  their  supporters.  But  other 
eminent  heralds  brmg  the  first  use  of  supporters  from  tournaments  and  joustings, 
and  others  from  the  solemnities  of  creating  nobility,  of  which  I  shall  give  a  full 
account. 

Mcnestrier  treats  of  supporters  fully,  and  brings  them  from  tournaments  and 
joustings,  to  which,  by  the  laws  of  exercises,  none  were  admitted  but  those  that 
were  truly  noble,  and  who  were  obliged  to  expose  their  arms,  as  proofs  of  their 
nobility,  which  they  then  adorned  with  their  helmets,  mantlings,  wreaths,  crests-, 
and  devices,  sometime  before  the  exercise  began,  to  the  end  that  they  might  the 
more  easily  be  known  and  distinguished  in  time  of  battle.  And  as  this  was,  as  I 
mentioned  before,  the  first  rise  of  these  exterior  ornaments,  so  Menestrier  and  other 
French  writers  bring  from  thence  the  rise  and  progressive  use  of  supporters.  The 
knights  nobles,  qualified  for  such  exercises,  had  their  arms  hung  up  on  the  barrier 
trees,  palaces,  and  pavilions,  near  to  the  place  of  jousting,  which  were  attended  by 
their  armour-bearers  and  esquires,  to  the  end  they  might  acquaint  their  masters 
what  knight  gave  them  a  challenge  to  fight,  which  was  done  by  touching  the 
shield.  Our  author  tells  us  the  knights  put  their  armour-bearers,  pages,  and  ser- 
vants in  such  dresses  as  they  fancied,  making  them  sometimes  appear  hke  Sa- 
vages, Saracens,  Moors,  Sirens,  and  with  other  odd  dresses ;  and  sometimes  under 
disguise  with  the  skins  of  lions,  bears,  £tc.  to  guard  their  shields  of  arms,  and  to 
give  an  account  of  the  names  and  arms  of  those  who  gave  the  challenge,  by  touch- 
ing the  shields  of  their  masters. 

I  shall  mention  here  the  formula  of  a  tournament  given  us  by  William  Segar 
Norroy  King  at  Arms  in  England,  in  his  book  of  Honour,  Military  and  Civil. 
This  tournament  was  holden  at  Ingueluer  in  France  1389,  which  several  French 
lords  and  gentlemen  occasioned,  by  giving  a  challenge  to  as  many  Englishmen  of 
the  same  quality.  A  part  of  the  challenge  from  the  French  side  I  shall  here  add 
from  our  author.  "  We  likewise  give  you  to  understand  that  such  order  is  taken, 
"  that  every  one  of  us  shall  have  a  shield  of  arms  and  impress,  (i.  e.  device  or 
"  crest)  hung  on  the  outside  of  his  pavilion,  to  the  end,  if  any  of  you  desire  to 
"  run  at  tilts,  then,  that  the  day  before,  ye  may,  with  a  lance,  or  such  weapon 
"  as  you  intend  to  joust  with,  touch  the  shield  of  the  defendant ;  and  who  intends 
"  to  try  his  fortune  both  with  blunt  and  sharp,  must  touch  the  shield  with  both, 
"  and  signify  his  name  and  arms  to  them  that  attend,  or  have  their  shields  in 
"  keeping." 

From  these  attenders  and  keepers  of  their  master's  shields,  heralds  bring  the  first 
use  of  supporters  occasioned  by  such  exercises,  into  which  all  that  were  noble  or 
gentle  by  father  and  mother's  side  were  admitted,  and  had  afterwards  right  to  carry 
supporters. 

I  cannot  omit  to  mention  a  famous  tournament  proclaimed  by  the  order  of  King 
James  IV.  of  Scotland,  through  Germany,  France,  and  England,  under  the  title, 
In  defence  of  the  Savage  Knight,  to  be  holden  at  Edinburgh  on  the  festival  of  his 
Majesty's  marriage  with  Margaret,  eldest  daughter  of  Henry  VII.  of  England. 
"  The  fame  of  which  tournament  (says  Hawthornden  in  his  History  of  the 
"  Jameses,  and  other  manuscripts,  which  I  have  seen  in  the  lawyers'  library) 
"  brought  many  foreign  lords  and  knights  to  Scotland,  where  challenges  were 
*'  given  and  received  in  defence  of  the  Savage  Knight,  for  several  days  before  the 
"  prefixt  day  of  exercise.  The  shields  of  the  nobility  and  gentry  of  Scotland, 
"  that  designed  to  joust  or  tilt,  vi'ere  hang  up  on  the  barrier  and  other  places  near 
"  by,  guarded  with  strong  and  robust  Highlandmcn,  in  savage  dress,  whose  figures 
"  afterwards  became  the  supporters  of  some  families  who  jousted  in  this  tourna- 
"  ment,  though  long  before  this  time  we  had  tournaments  in  Alexander  II.  his 
"  reign  ;  from  which  time  I  think  supporters  began  with  us,  as  by  ancient  seals, 
"  where  savages  are  placed  as  supporters  at  the  sides  of  the  shields." 

John  Baptista  Chancellor  of  Brabant,  a  learned  gentleman  in  this  science,  in  his 
commendable  book  Jurispnidentia  Heroicn,  chapter  Of  Supporters,  tells  us,  "  That 
"  some  are  of  the  opinion  that  their  rise  and  custom  of  hanging  up  shields  was  in 
"  imitation  of  the  Romans,  who,  after  their  return  from  victory,  hanged  up 
"  shields,  helmets,  and  other  trophies,  which  they  had  taken  from  their  enemies, 
"  upon  trees  and  public  places,  to  show  their  valour  and  conquest." 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  29, 

"  Others  again,  says  our  author,  impute  the  use  of  supporters  to  the  vanity  and 
"  ambition  of  men  to  embellish  their  arms,  and  the  t-;sst:r(f  of  their  descent,  with 
"  such  figures  as  pleased  them,  till  they  were  restricted  by  the  laws  of  nations, 
"  which  allowed  them  to  none  but  to  those  who  were  able  to  erect  a  banner  ni  the 
"  field;  such  as  hiyh  barons,  bannerets,  and  knights,who  were  allowed  the  figure 
"  of  any  creature  they  fancied  to  support  their  banners;  for  they  could  not  stand 
"  properly  at  the  sides  of  their  shields  of  arras  without  supporters  holding  them 
"  up.  Banners  are  more  frequent  in  Germany  than  elsewhere."  I  shall  add  here 
our  author's  words  ;  "  Sed  cum  vexilla,  hu:c  per  se  subsistere,  circa  insignia  ne- 
"  quaquam  possent,  excogitavit  industria  hominum,  vel  ambitio  tenentes  sivc 
"  sustentantes,  quos  cum  icque  atque  vexilla  ipsa  indistincte  assumere  non  eru- 
"  besceret." 

Our  author  is  much  for  the  opinion,  as  most  reasonable,  that-  supporters  had 
their  rise  from  tournaments  and  joustings,  as  1  have  given  them  from  IVlenestrier 
and  others  ;  for  which  1  shall  here  add  his  own  words  from  the  supplement  to  his 
book,  page  139.  "  Alii  originem  telamonuin  venus  derivant  a  certaminibus,  ludi- 
"  cris,  seu  hastdudiis,  in  quibus  milites  suas  curabant  deferri  lanceas  is-  scuta  per 
"  ephebos  &•  pedissequos  (youths  and  waiting-men)  transformatos  in  ursos,  leones, 
"  silvestres,  ethiopes,  &  id  genus  alias  formas,  ut  videre  est  in  antiquis  historiis, 
"  &■  memoriis  Oliverii  a  Marca.  Injungebatur  his  latoribus  &  pedissequis  ut 
"  campum  martium  aperirent,  afllgerent  scuti  pendula  arboribus  aut  columnis,  in 
"  viis  pubficis,  vel  locis  ad  dimicandum  assignatis,  ut  contra  prodituri  in  campum 
"  tangerent  ilia  scuta,  quibus  promiscue  ut  custodes  adstabant,  pigmei,  gigantes, 
"  silvestres,  sarazeni,  monstra,  vel  homines  in  forma  animalium  aderent  &-  feciales, 
"  qui  nomen  inscriberent  &-  observarent  illos,  qui  eorum  scuta  tangerent,  atque 
"  exinde  nomen  tenentium  (gallice  tenents)  conflatum  volunt."  The  import  of 
which  is  the  same  which  I  brought  from  Menestrier  in  the  former  page,  and 
needless  here  to  be  repeated,  to  wit,  that  the  rise  of  supporters  came  from  the 
customs  of  tournaments,  in  having  the  shields  of  the  combatants  attended  by  their 
esquires  and  pages  in  v/hatever  dress  they  would. 

Those  who  were  admitted  into  tournaments  and  joustings  were  obliged,  to  make 
a  formal  proof  of  their  ancient  nobility  by  both  descents,  paternal  and  maternal, 
before  the  heralds,  who  attended  for  that  end  ;  and  then  their  armorial  ensigns 
with  their  crests  and  other  devices  were  recorded,  and  formerly  exposed  with  their 
pages  and  servants  in  several  dresses  or  disguises. 

Sir  George  Mackenzie,  in  his  Science  of  Heraldry,  chap.  31.  Of  supporters,  gives 
another  rise  of  them  as  follows. 

"  Supporters  (says  he)  are  those  exterior  ornaments  which  are  placed  without 
"  the  shield  at  its  sides,  and  were  at  first  invented  (as  Petra  Sancta  observes)  to 
"  represent  the  armour-bearers  of  knights.  But  why  then  are  they  ordinarily  two  ? 
"  And  therefore  1  rather  believe  that  their  first  origin  and  use  was  from  the  custom 
"  whichever  was  and  is,  of  leading  such  as  are  invested  with  any  great  honour  to 
"  die  prince  who  confers  it.  Thus  when  any  man  is  created  a  duke,  marquis,  or 
"  knight  of  St  Andrew,  of  the  Garter,  or  any  other  order,  either  in  Scotland  or 
"  elsewhere,  he  is  supported  by,  and  led  to  the  prince  betwixt  two  of  the  quality, 
"  and  so  receives  from  him  the  symbols  of  that  honour :  And  in  remembrance  of 
"  that  solemnity  his  arms  are  thereafter  supported  by  any  two  creatures  which  he 
"  chooses ;  and  therefore,  in  the  received  opinion  of  all  heralds,  only  nohilcs  majores 
"  who  have  been  so  invested  in  these  honours  are  allowed  to  have  supporters  :  And 
"  albeit  chiefs  of  old  families  have  used  supporters  with  us,  yet  they  owe  these  to 
•'  prescription,  and  not  to  the  original  institution  of  heraldry,  as  shall  be  observed. 
"  Others,  as  Menestiner,  think  that  when  knights  hung  up  their  shields  to  provoke 
"  all  passengers  to  this  combat,  they  placed  their  pages  or  armour-bearers  under 
"  the  disguises  of  wild-men,  lions,  bears,  &-c.  to  watch  who  offered  to  touch  them  ; 
"  and  thereafter  they  used  these  figures  as  supporters.  But  beside  that  this 
"  fancy  seems  as  wild  as  the  supporters,  it  may  be  asked,  why  some  men  use 
"  fowls  or  fishes  .•'  To  which  nothing  can  be  answered,  save  that  beasts  being  once 
"  allowed,  each  man  choosed  thereafter  any  living  creature  he  pleased."  I  shall 
here  subjoin  what  Sir  George  says  in  another  place  in  the  above-mentioned 
chapter. 


3° 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


"  According  to  Chassaneus  his  opinion,  an  heritable  sheriff,  or  an  eminent 
"  judge  may  take  supporters  :  and  I  crave  liberty  to  assert,  that  all  our  chiefs  of 
"  families  and  old  barons  of  Scotland  may  use  supporters  :  For,  besides  that  to  be 
"  a  chief,  was  of  old;  and  is  still,  reputed  an  honour,  though  it  be  adorned  with  no 
"  mark  of  nobility,  yet  these  chiefs  have  prescribed  a  right  to  use  supporters  ; 
"  and  that  such  a  right  may  be  prescribed,  I  have  proven  formerly  ;  and  what 
"  warrant  is  for  most  of  our  rules  in  heraldry,  but  an  aged  custom  :  And  that 
"  they  have  constantly  used  supporters,  past  all  memory  of  man,  even  when  they 
"  were  knights,  is  clear  from  many  hundred  instances.  Thus  the  lairds  of  Pncuii 
"  did,  and  do  use  two  wild  cats  for  their  supporters ;  Fotherwgham  of  Powrie, 
"  two  naked  men  ;  Irvine  of  Drum,  two  savages,  wreathed  about  head  and  loins 
"  with  holland,  and  bearing  battons  in  their  hands  ;  Moncrief  of  that  Ilk,  two  men 
"  armed  at  all  points,  bearing  picks  on  their  shoulders:  And  many  of  our  noble- 
"  men  have  only  retained  the  supporters  which  they  formerly  had.  And  that,  of 
"  old,  barons  might  use  supporters  de  jure,  seems  most  certain ;  for  they  were 
"  members  of  parliament  with  us  as  such,  and  never  lost  that  privilege,  though 
"  for  their  convenience  they  were  allowed  to  be  represented  by  two  of  their  num- 
"  her ;  and  therefore  such  as  were  barons  before  that  time  may  have  supporters, 
"  as  well  as  lord  barons  ;  nor  should  we  be  governed  in  this  by  the  custom  of 
"  England,  seeing  their  is  dispar  ratio  ;  and  this  is  now  allowed  by  the  principal 
"  herald  to  judge  at  the  time  who  have  right. " 

Supporters  are  not  so  heritably  fixed  but  they  may  be  altered  at  pleasure,  in 
their  species  and  forms,  by  those  who  have  right  to  carry  supporters,  as  Colum- 
bier,  Sir  George  Mackenzie,  and  others ;  for  it  is  fit  that  these  extrinsic  parts  of 
achievements  should  not  be  heritably  fixed,  to  the  end  men  may  have  somewhat 
to  assume  or  alter  upon  considerable  emergents :  But  if  cadets  keep  their  chiefs' 
supporters,  they  use  to  adject  some  difference ;  as  is  to  be  seen  in  the  Earl  of 
Kelly's  achievement.    Mackenzie. 

Before  I  proceed  to  give  instances  of  arras  with  supporters,  and  the  occasions 
upon  which  they  were  given  and  taken  with  us  and  other  nations,  I  shall  insist  a 
little  here  of  their  ancient  use  in  general.  At  first  one  supporter  was  used  to  carry  up 
the  shield  ;  as  by  our  ancient  documents  and  seals,  which  represented  the  armour- 
bearer  of  knights,  and  afterwards  came  to  be  two,  one  at  each  side  of  the  shield : 
And  for  the  verity  that  one  supporter  was  used  anciently,  I  shall  add  here  the 
words  of  Jurisprudential  page  369,  par.  18.  "  Olim  unicum  duntaxat  sustenta- 
"  culum  ad  primores  viros  usurpatum  fuisse  Vetera  nos  decent  monumenta.  Ipsis 
"  enim  solummodo  regibus,  aut  principibus  bina  assumere  sustentacula  licitum 
"  erat.  "  For  which  our  author  cites  many  others.  So  then  it  is  groundless  to 
bring  the  first  origin  and  use  of  supporters  from  the  custom  of  leading  such  as  are 
invested  with  any  great  honour  to  the  prince,  who  conferred  it  as  above  shown. 
But  from  whence  came  the  use  of  sovereigns  having  supporters,  who  were  not  led 
by  their  equals  to  receive  their  imperial  rights  and  diadems,  being  attended  only 
by  their  subjects,  and  sometimes  by  officers,  as  armour-bearers  and  esquires,  in 
royal  solemnities  ?  And  I  am  much  in  the  opinion  with  Menestrier  and  others, 
who  bring  the  first  use  of  supporters  from  the  armour-bearers  of  kniglits.  And 
of  old  none  but  one  supporter  was  used  by  those  that  were  not  eminent  princes, 
as  by  our  above-mentioned  author;  of  which  I  shall  add  a  few  instances. 

Our  ancientest  seals  had  only  the  image  of  the  owner,  sometimes  with  his  shield 
of  arms  hung  about  his  neck,  or  holden  up  by  his  left  arm,  and  he  the  only  sup- 
porter; but  afterwards  these  arms  came  to  be  supported  by  one  creature  or  an- 
other: And  Menestrier  tells  us,  "  That  he  has  seen  the  shield  of  arms  of  the 
••  old  Dukes  of  Burgundy  only  supported  by  one  lion,  with  its  head  in  a  hel- 
"  met." 

Sandford,  in  his  Genealogical  History,  gives  us  the  seal  of  arms  of  Margaret 
Duchess  of  Norfolk,  supported  by  an  angel.  Such  another  seal  of  arms  I  have 
seen,  which  belonged  to  Mary  Queen  of  King  James  II.  which  had  the  arms  of 
Scotland  impaled  with  her  paternal  coat,  viz.  two  Hons  combatant,  supported  only 
by  one  angel. 

The  imperial  ensign  of  Scotland  is  yet  to  be  seen   on  the  frontispiece  of  the 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


3J 


outer  entry  to  the  abbey  of  HoIyroodhoUbC,  the  shield  supported  only  by  one  uni- 
corn seiiiiit. 

Walter  Leslik,  designed  Dominus  de  Ross,  who  married  Elizabeth  Ross,  one  of 
ths  co-heirs  of  Walter  Earl  ot  Ross,  had  on  his  seal  of  arms  three  shields  lie,  i.  e. 
tied  together,  liolaen  by  the  beak  of  an  eagle  for  a  supporter;  of  whose  arms 
formerly. 

From  Uredus's  Collections  of  the  Old  Seals  of  the  Earls  of  Flanders,  we  have 
many  instances  of  arms  supported  only  by  one  animal  ;  as  that  of  Ludovick  Ma- 
LJiANUs,  appended  to  a  diploma,  whereupon  is  the  shield  of  urms  of  Flanders  sup- 
ported by  one  lion,  anno  1 2,59-  Philii'  the  Buld  Duke  of  Bukgundy,  son  of  John 
King  of  France,  who  married  Margaret,  daughter  and  heir  of  the  above  Lodovick 
Earl  of  lland'irs.  on  whose  seal  was  a  shield,  quarterly,  the  arms  of  Burgundy 
Ancient  and  Modern,  and  supported  only  by  one  eagle  :  But  his  dutchess  Maigaret 
had  on  her  seal  a  lozenge  shield,  with  her  anus  dimidiate  w  ith  those  of  her  hust)and 
Phiiip,  viz.  four  animals  supporters  ;  her  husband's  two  supporters  the  eagles  stood 
upon  the  upper  two  sides  of  the  lozenge  shield  ;  and  two  hons  sciant,  supported  the 
two  under  sides  of  tlie  lozenge,  being  these  which  her  father  used.  The  like  of 
which  I  never  met  with  in  any  book  or  seals;  which  seals,  as  1  have  described 
them,  were  appended  to  diplomas  in  the  year  1384. 

As  for  the  antiquity  of  using  supporters  with  us,  Sir  George  Mackenzie,  in  his 
Science  of  Heraldry,  gives  us  as  uncouth  an  one  as  the  last  mentioned,  being  the 
shield  of  arms  of  Muriel  Countess  of  Strathern,  supported  on  the  left  side  by  a 
falcon  standing  upon  the  neck  of  a  duck,  lying  under  the  base  point  of  a  formal 
shield,  and  all  placed  within  a  lozenge,  which  he  dates  from  the  year  1284,  ^"^^ 
which  is  the  oldest  and  ancientest  that  ever  I  met  with. 

Sir  James  Balfour,  in  his  Manuscript  of  Exterior  Ornaments,  says,  "  The  first 
"  use  of  supporters  with  us  began  about  the  end  of  the  reign  of  Alexander  11.  and 
"  were  frequent  in  the  reign  of  Alexander  III.  which  began  in  the  year  1249, 
"  and  who  reigned  37  years  :"  But  gives  us  no  instances  who  carried  supporters, 
till  the  reign  of  John  Baliol ;  and- then  tells  us,  "That  John  Cumin  Earl  of 
"  BucHAN,  and  great  Constable  of  Scotland,  had  his  arms  supported  by  two  snakes 
"  or  vipers ;  and  that  Thomas  Randolph  Earl  of  Murray  (who  hved  in  the  reign 
"  of  King  David  Bruce,  and  who  first  began  the  use  of  supporters  in  England} 
"  had  his  supported  by  two  winged  dragons.  " 

The  seal  of  John,  .Senchal  of  Kyle,  eldest  son  of  Robert  Stewart  of  Scotland, 
was  appended  with  his  father's  (who  were  both  successively  kings  of  Scotland,  by 
the  name  of  Robert  U.  and  III.)  to  a  charter  of  theirs  to  the  burgh  of  Glasgow, 
anno  1364.  The  shield  of  arms  of  the  Lord  Kyle  was  cotiche,  and  supported 
by  two  savages ;  as  by  the  absti-acts  of  the  charter  in  the  Scots  College  of 
Paris. 

I  have  seen  the  seal  of  arms  of  William  Lord  of  Douglas,  before  he  was  Earl, 
upon  which  he  had  only  the  paternal  coat  of  Douglas  in  a  shield  couche,  supported 
by  a  lion  seiant,  with  its  head  in  a  helmet,  topped  with  a  plume  of  feathers  for 
crest,  which  timbredthe  shield.  Upon  this  Earl's  marrying  Margaret,  Countess 
and  heir  of  Marr,  for  his  second  wife,  he  quartered  with  his  own  the  arms  of 
Marr,  supported  as  the  former,  with  the  addition  of  two  trees  growing  at  the 
sides  of  his  achievement ;  and  below  "the  shield,  by  way  of  compartment,  was 
a  field  seme  of  cross  croslets  and  mullets,  appended  to  a  charter  of  his,  in 
which  he  is  designed  Earl  of  Douglas  and  Marr,  to  James  Mowat  of  the 
lands  of  Easter-Fouhs,  dated  at  the  Castle  of  Kildrumy,  26th  of  July,  anno 
1377- 

I  have  seen  many  of  the  seals  of  the  Earls  of  Dunbar  and  M'VRCh,  which  were 
all  equestrian  till  the  year  1400,  whose  shields  of  arms  were  afterwards  supported 
by  two  lions  seiant,  and  behind  their  backs  trees. 

I  have  likewise  met  with  the  seals  of  arms  of  our  ancient  barons;  as  that  of  Sir 
Alexander  Home  of  tliat  Ilk,  whose  shield  was  supported  by  two  lions;  Somer- 
viLLE  of  Linton  and  Cambusnethan  supported  with  two  greyhounds :  And  Cran- 
ston of  that  I:k  supported  his  shield  on  the  right  side  by  a  woman  in  rich  attire, 
holding  a  bush  of  strawberries,  and  on  the  left  by  a  roebuck.     Those  barons,  with 

Vol.  II.  N  n. 


3-  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

others,  long  before   their   famihes  were  dignified   with   the  titles  of  lord  or  eari; 
kept  still  their  old  supporters. 

I  have  also  seen  those  of  other  barons,  whose  families  were  never  dignified ;  as- 
that  of  David  Home  of  Wedderburn,  appended  to  a  discharge  to  his  nephew,  the 
above  Sir  ALEXiVNDER  Home  of  that  Ilk,  dated  at  Cockburnspath  27th  of  January 
1443,  supported  with  two  falcons  regardant;  and  Roger  Kirkpatrick  of  Close- 
burn,  one  of  the  Barons  of  Inquest,  in  the  service  of  William  Lord  Somerville, 
heir  to  his  father  Thomas  Lord  Somerville,  had,  on  his  seal  appended  to  the  retour, 
the  loth  of  June  1435,  the  escutcheon  of  his  arms  supported  with  two  lions  gar- 
dant;  and  his  son  Thomas,  in  the  year  1470,  carried  the  same,  though  now  the 
family  use  for  supporters  two  hounds.  And  on  the  seal  of  William  Murray 
of  Touchadam,  Constable  and  Governor  of  the  Castle  of  Stirling,  now  designed  of 
P'olmaise,  his  arms  were  supported  with  two  lions.  Many  more  examples  of  our 
gentry  using  supporters  are  to  be  met  with  in  our  old  books  of  blazons,  on  their 
houses  and  tombs,  as  representers  of  the  ancient  barons  and  chiefs  of  families;  a 
few  of  which  I  shall  here  mention.  Dundas  of  that  Ilk,  for  supporters,  has  two 
hons:  Fullarton  of  that  Ilk,  in  the  shire  of  Ayr,  has  two  savages  wreathed 
about  the  head  and  middle,  holding  battons  over  their  shoulders. 

Innes  of  that  Ilk,  two  greyhounds  collared  azure,  charged  with  three  stars. 
Pollock  of  that  Ilk  two  hounds,  proper;  and  Maxwell  of  Pollock  had  his  arras 
supported,  in  the  reign  of  Robert  III.  by  tv.'o  monkies,  as  by  his  seal  of  arms  which 
I  have  seen.     Dunbar  of  Westfield,   Heritable  Sheriff  of  Murray,  has  two  lions 
rampant  argent. 

Halyburton  of  Pitcur  two  wild  cats;  and  Farquharson  of  Invercauld  carries 
the  like  creatures. 

Irvine  of  Drum  two  savages  wreathed  about  the  head  and  loins  with  laurel, 
proper,  bearing  battons  in  their  hands. 

FoTHERiNGHAM  of  Powric  two  naked  men. 

MoNCRiEF  of  that  Ilk  two  men  armed  at  all  points,  bearing  pikes  on  their 
shoulders. 

Skene  of  that  Ilk,  two  Highlandmen,  the  one  on  the  dexter  side  in  a  Highland 
gentleman's  dress,  holding  in  his  right  hand  a  skein,  point  downward ;  and  the 
other,  on  the  sinister,  in  a  servant's  dress,  with  his  darlach,  and  a  target  on  his 
left  arm. 

Dalmahoy  of  that  Ilk  has  two  serpents  cottising  his  arms. 

Sir  John  Nisbet  of  Dean,  baronet,  his  family  has  been  in  use  for  a  long  time,  by 
allowance  of  authority,  to  carry  supporters,  viz.  on  the  right  side  of  the  shield  a 
savage  wreathed  about  the  head  and  middle,  holding  a  batton  in  his  right  hand, 
all  proper;  and  on  the  left  side  a  greyhound,  proper:  Which  two  supporters  up- 
hold the  principal  arms  of  the  family  of  Nisbet  of  that  Ilk,  viz.  argent,  three 
boars'  heads  erased  sable,  armed  and  langued  gules,  with  the  crest  of  the  family, 
laying  aside  the  cheveron,  a  mark  of  cadency,  used  formerly  by  the  House  of 
Dean:  in  regard  that  the  family  of  Dean  is  the  only  family  of  the  name  in  Scot- 
land that  has  right,  by  consent,  to  represent  the  old  original  family  of  the  name 
of  Nisbet;  since  the  only  lineal  male  representer  (the  author  of  this  System) 
is  like  to  go  soon  off  the  world,  being  an  old  man,  and  without  issue-male  or 
female. 

Edgar  of  Wadderly  two  greyhounds ;  and  Haig  of  Bemerside  has,  for  supporters, 
two  lions  gules. 

In  Workman's  Illuminate  Book  of  Arms  there  are  several  knights  who  have  their 
arms  supported;  as  Sir  Patrick  Barclay  of  Towie  with  two  hounds:  motto,  Hi7tc 
honor  et  amor. 

Sir  George  Douglas  of  Redhouse's  arms  are  there  illuminate,  being  argent,  a 
lion's  head  erased  gules,  in  base  a  crescent  of  the  last,  and,  on  a  chief  azure,  two  stars 
argent,  as  descended  of  the  House  of  Morton,  and  the  crescent,  as  a  vassal  to  the 
House  of  Seaton,  supported  by  two  griffins. 

Sir  NiEL  Montgomery  of  Langshaw's  arms,  a-zure,  a  stoned  ring,  proper,  between 
three  flower-dp-luces  or;  supporters,  two  dragons. 

Sir  David  Wood  of  Craigie,  his  arms  supported  by  two  savages  wreathed  about 
the  middle  with  laurel. 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


33 


Sir  John  Graham  of  Ncrherness  carried  tlie  arms  of  Montrose,  with  a  label  of 
three  points  for  difference,  supported  on  the  right  side  by  a  hound,  and  on  the  left 
by  a  falcon,  proper. 

Bruce  of  Airth  had  two  savages  wreathed  about  the  head  and  middle,  proper; 
crest,  a  horse-head;  with  the  motto,  Do  well  and  doubt  not. 

There  are  many  more  gentlemen,  besides  the  ancient  barons  and  chiefs  of  fa- 
milies, who  have  supporters  add.:d  to  their  blazons  in  our  New  Register  of  Arms, 
having  right,  as  I  suppose,  by  concession  or  prescription;  of  wliich  1  have  given 
many  examples  in  the  Plates  of  Achievements  in  the  First  Part  of  tliis  System, 
as  also  in  this  Second  Part,  to  which  I  refer  the  reader. 

The  right  of  using  supporters  is  hereditary  with  us  in  the  lineal  heirs  and  re- 
presentatives of  families;  but  not  to  the  younger  sons  of  collaterals,  unless  they 
become  representatives  of  the  family :  neither  in  the  greater  or  lesser  nobility, 
which  in  the  first  seems  strange,  since  the  younger  sons  of  dukes  and  marquises 
have  the  title  of  lord  prefixed  to  their  names,  and  take  precedency  of  hereditary 
lords  of  Parliament.  But  though  the  titles  they  have  be  only  temporary,  and  do 
not  descend  to  tlieir  posterity,  yet  I  am  of  opinion  they  may  use  supporters  by  the 
same  right  that  knights-bannerets  did,  whose  dignity  was  also  temporary,  and  that 
with  their  marks  of  cadency  upon  them,  if  agreeable,  and  if  not  with  other  addi- 
tior.al  figures:  For  the  same  reason  that  they  now  of  late  place  the  coronets  of  the 
respective  dignities  of  their  fathers  on  their  helmets,  to  show  the  eminency  of  their 
birth. 

It  is  not  allowed  to  the  nobility  or  gentry,  who  have  right  to  carry  supporters, 
to  assume  those  of  the  sovereign's  achievement,  unless  they  be  of  the  blood  royal, 
or  have  obtained  from  the  sovereign  a  special  warrant  for  so  doing,  to  show  either 
the  support  and  honour  they  had  from  the  royal  family,  or  for  some  special  services 
they  had  performed  to  the  same.  Thus  the  Earl  of  Strathmore,  being  descend- 
ed of  a  daughter  of  King  Robert  II.  has,  for  supporter,  on  the  right  side,  an 
unicorn  argent,  maned,  unguled,  and  horned  or,  (the  royal  supporter)  and  collar- 
ed vert,  charged  with  a  thistle  or;  and,  on  the  left,  a  lion  gules,  armed. and  lan- 
gued  or. 

Bruce  of  Clackmanan  was  allowed  the  royal  supporters;  Ramsay  Earl  of  Hol- 
DERNESS,  and  Viscount  of  Haddington,  for  his  special  service,  besides  other  aug- 
mentations of  honour,  was  allowed  to  support  his  arms  with  the  unicorn  of  Scot- 
land on  the  riglit,  and  an  antelope  on  the  leff  Carey  Viscount  of  Falkland  hid 
the  like  unicorn  on  the  dexter,  collared  sable,  charged  with  roses;  and  on  the 
sinister  a  lion  gardant  argent,  collared  and  cro\vned  with  a  ducal  crown ;  and  se- 
veral others  have  the  hke. 

It  is  allowed,  by  the  practice  of  heraldry,  for  many  different  families  to  carry 
the  same  supporters  without  any  ground  of  offence,  or  concluding  them  to  be 
of  one  descent  and  kin;  which  practice  is  frequent  with  us,  especially  in  using 
savages  for  supporters.  The  Marquis  of  Douglas  has  one ;  and  the  Earls  of  Athgl 
had  two  savages,  though  now  but  one,  the  other,  a  lion,  being  for  Tullibardin; 
the  Earls  of  Sutherland,  Morton,  Perth,  Roxburgh,  Galloway,  Seaforth,  Cromarty, 
Stirling,  Elgin,  Viscount  of  Kenmure,  Lords  Herries,  Kinnaird,  Elphinston,  Blantyre, 
Maderty,  and  many  old  barons,  carry  savages,  some  of  them  with  laurels  about  the 
heads,  and  battons  in  their  hands.  The  frequency  of  which  with  us  I  presume  had 
rise  in  imitation  of  John,  Seneschal  of  Kyle,  eldest  son  of  Robert  II.  King  of  Scot- 
land, who  was  king  after  his  father  by  the  name  of  Robert  III.  or  else  proceeds  from 
that  tournament  proclaimed,  and  holden  by  King  James  IV.  in  defence  of  the 
Savage  Knight ;  of  which  I  have  given  account  before,  where  many  of  our  nobility, 
and  gentry  appeared  with  their  servants  in  the  dress  of  savages,  which  became  the 
supporters  of  several  families.. 

Supporters  have  been  given  and  taken  upon  many  ocasions ;  sometimes  from  the 
armorial  figure  within  the  shield,  as  those  of  Spain,  two  lions,  the  armorial  figure 
of  the  kingdom  being  a  lion.  The  Prince  Palatine  of  Bavaria,  the  Duke  of 
Luxembourg,  and  other  royal  families  in  Europe,  have  lions  for  supporters,  be- 
cause their  armorial  figure  within  the  shield  is  such:  And  the  same  reason  has 
occasioned  our  nobility  to  do  the  like;  as  Home  Earl  of  Ho.me,  Home  Earl  of 
Marchmonp,  Crichton  Earl  of  Dumfries,  Ogilvie  Earl  of  Findlater,  Gray  Lord 


54 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


Gray,  Dundas  of  that  Ilk,  because  their  armorial  figures  are  such.  As  also  many 
other  families  vvho  have  eagles,  griffins,  boars  and.  bears,  for  their  armoiial  charges; 
and  if  they  carry  but  a  head  of  any  of  those  creatures,  they  make  use  of  their  en- 
tire bodies  for  their  supporters;  as  Forbes  Lord  Forbes,  who  carries  for  arms  three 
bears'  heads  couped,  has  for  supporters  two  bears,  proper. 

When  the  armorial  charges  witliin  the  shield  are  not  living  creatures,  nor  figures 
fit  to  be  supporters,  I  observe  that  lions  are  assumed  by  severals,  but  with  some 
variation,  upon  the  account,  as  I  suppose,  that  the  lion  is  the  sovereign  figure  of 
the  nation,  or  because  he  is  said  to  be  the  king  of  beasts,  and  the  most  noble  and 
fierce  of  all  others.  The  family  of  Argyle  has,  for  supporters,  two  lions  gardant 
gules,  armed  or:  Graham  Earl  of  Monteith  two  lions  gardant  gules,  armed  and 
langued  azure,  collared  sable,  and  charged  with  three  escalops  or,  the  figures  of  the 
paternal  bearing.  Murray  Earl  of  Annandale  supported  his  arms  with  two  lions 
argent,  crowned  or,  one  of  which  the  Lord  Johnston  took  when  he  was  honoured 
with  that  earldom.  Murray  Earl  of  Tollibardin  two  lions  gules,  collared  ur, 
charged  with  three  <stars  azure,  one  of  which  is  now  one  of  the  supporters  of  die 
family  of  Athol,  which  represents  that  of  TuUibardin.  And  the  Viscount  of 
Stormont,  as  descended  of  TuUibardin,  had,  for  supporters,  two  lions  gutes,  armed 
or,  because  none  of  those  families'  armorial  figures  were  fit  to  be  supporters, 
being  girons,  escalops,  stars,  or  mullets;  and  many  such  examples  may  be  added, 
which  I  think  needless. 

Some  families  take  supporters  relative  to  their  names  or  designations,  when  no 
figures  in  their  arms  speak  to  them.  The  family  of  Ursini  in  Italy  has  two  bears 
in  allusion  to  the  name;  and  the  Grimaldi,  Princes  of  Monaco,  in  allusion  to  their 
title  Monaco,  have  for  supporters  two  Augustine  monks.  Naples,  anciently  called 
Parthenope,  from  the  name  of  a  syren,  or  mermaid,  whose  tomb  was  there; 
upon  which  account  the  arms  of  the  kingdom  of  Naples  are  supported  with  two 
syrens.  The  Duke  of  Gloucester,  seventh  son  of  Edward  III.  surnamed  Wood- 
stock from  the  place  where  he  was  born,  had  his  shield  of  arms  on  his  seals  re- 
presented hanging  on  the  stock  of  a  tree,  alluding  to  Woodstock.  With  us  Cun- 
ningham, Earl  of  Glencairn  has,  for  supporters,  two  conies,  proper,  relative  to  the 
name :  Oliphant  Lord  Oliphant  two  elephants,  for  his  name ;  and  Ruthven  Earl 
of  Gowrie  had  two  goats  supporters,  relative  to  the  earldom  of  Gowrie,  which  sig- 
nifies a  goat. 

Upon  the  account  of  hunting  and  hawking,  hounds  and  dogs  of  all  sorts,  as 
also  harts,  deers,  bucks,  hawks,  and  falcons,  are  used  by  many  families.  Sir 
George  Mackenzie  tells  us,  "  The  Earl  of  Panmure  changed  his  old  supporters 
"  to  two  greyhounds,  because  he  was  first  noticed  by  King  James  VI.  on  the  oc- 
"  casion  of  his  entertaining  his  majesty  with  excellent  sport  in  the  muir  of  Mon- 
"  roben." 

Upon  the  account  of  employment,  supporters  have  been  assumed  thus:  M'Kay 
Lord  Rae,  when  he  went  to  Germany  with  a  regiment  of  foot  to  assist  Gustavus 
Adolphus,  supported  his  arras  on  the  right  side  by  a  pikeman  armed  at  all  points, 
and  on  the  left  by  a  musqueteer,  proper.  And  General  Alexander  Leslie,  when 
created  Earl  of  Leven  by  King  Charles  I.  supported  his  arms  vv^ith  two  men  in  ar- 
mour, holding  in  their  hands  flying  colours:  Keith  Earl  of  Kintore  took  two 
armed  men  with  pikes:  The  Lord  Carmichael  has  his  arms  supported  on  the 
right  by  an  armed  man  in  all  points,  holding  a  batton  in  his  hand,  and  on  the  left 
by  a  horse  argent,  furnished  gules.  Sir  Thomas  Livingston  being  made  Viscount 
of  Teviot,  for  his  victory  at  Cromdale,  had  given  him  for  supporters  two  white 
horses  bridled  and  furnished  gules.  The  Earl  of  Annandale  has  such  a  horse, 
furnished,  for  one  of  his  supporters,  on  account  of  his  being  Warden  of  the  West 
Marches.  Seaton  Earl  of  Dunfermline  has  two  horses  at  Hberty  argent,  with 
mane  and  tailor;  and  Douglas  Dukeof  Queensberry  two  pegasus,  i.e.  hoises  argent, 
with  wings  or;  and  the  same  by  Douglas  Earl  of  March,  a  son  of  that  family. 

Monstrous  creatures  are  used  frequently  to  support  arms,  as  griflins,  dragons, 
&.C.  Erskine  Earl  of  Marr  two  griffins,  proper,  winged  or,  membred  sable: 
Leslie  Earl  of  Rothes  the  same:  And  Montgomery  Earl  of  Eglinton  two  dragons 
vert,  vomiting  fire,  carried  by  the  family  ever  since  they  came  from  the  House  of 
Seaton.  The  family  before  that  time  had  two  angels  in  Dalmatic  habits;  as  on  the 
roof  of  the  house  of  Seaton. 

I 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


The  bodies  of  devices,  wliich  were  anciently  placed  at  the  sides,  above  or  below 
the  shields  ot  arms,  as  1  observed  before  in  the  former  chapter,  huve  became  sup- 
porters of  arms.  And  1  may  begin  with  the  unicorn,  one  of  the  ancient  devices 
used  by  our  kings,  not  only  for  Ids  strength,  courage,  and  particular  virtue  of  his 
horn  in  dispelling  poison,  (as  writers  tell  us)  but  as  the  emblem  of  unconquerable 
freedom;  as  job,  in  his  book,  chap,  xxxix.  "  Canst  thou  bind  the  unicorn  with 
"  his  band?  \\'ill  he  be  willing  to  serve  or  abide  by  thy  crib?"  A  suitable  device 
for  Scotland,  which  became  the  supporter  of  its  imperial  ensign,  and  continues 
the  badge  of  its  independency.  Other  nations  have  likewise  used  the.r  devices  as 
supporters,  which  have  been  often  altered  upon  emergencies,  and  dilierent  sue 
cessions. 

Thus  King  Charles  VI.  of  France,  as  Juvenal  Ursini,  in  his  History  of  that 
King,  tells  us,  "  That  when  hunting  at  Senlis,  he  perceived  a  stag  which  had  a 
"  collar  about  its  neck :  The  king  ordered  it  to  be  taken  alive ;  which  being  done, 
"  the  collar  was  of  leather,  having  these  words,  Casar  hoc  mihi  donavit :"  Whereupon 
that  king  took  for  his  device  a  hart,  or  stag,  with  wings,  and  a  golden  crown  about 
his  neck  ;  and  afterwards  supported  his  arms  with  two  such  creatures,  about  the 
year  1380.  Lewis  VII.  of  France  made  his  device,  a  porcupine,  his  supporter, 
and  Francis  I.  took  his  device,  a  salamander,  for  a  supporter.  But  of  late  the 
supporters  of  France  have  been  two  angels  in  Dalmatic  habits,  winged  or,  and  on 
their  breasts  the  arms  of  France,  holding  by  one  of  their  hands  the  banners  of 
France  accolU,  with  those  of  Navarre. 

Angels  being  the  ordinary  supporters  now  of  France,  some  heralds  tell  us,  as 
Philip  Moreau,  "  That  none  can  use  them  but  those  of  the  royal  blood  of  France, 
"  and  who  have  a  special  warrant  for  that  end,  being  now  the  fixed  tenents  of 
"  France." 

But  Menestrier  tells  us,  "  There  are  many  instances  to  the  contrary  to  be  seen 
"  on  the  tombs  in  churches,  before  and  since  the  use  of  such  tenents  by  the  French 
"  kings :  For,  of  old,  churchmen  in  France,  and  other  kingdoms,  would  not  allow 
"  the  arms  of  those  that  were  interred  in  the  church,  to  be  adorned  with  their  pro- 
"  per  supporters,  being  the  representation  of  lions,  dragons,  saltiers,  savages,  and 
"  other  monstrous  and  fabulous  creatures ;  but,  ui  place  of  them,  with  angels, 
"  more  properly  becoming  the  church  :  Hence  it  is,  says  our  author,  that  we  see 
"  so  many  arms  in  churches  supported  by  angels,  which  are  not  marks  of  honour, 
"  but  ornaments  allowed  by  the  clergy,  even  to  those  who  have  no  right  to  sup- 
"  porters.  Our  author  tells  us  also  of  many  ancient  families  in  France,  as  that  of 
"  Memorancy  and  others,  many  degrees  of  descent  from  the  blood  royal,  who,  with- 
"  out  special  warrant,  have  been  in  use,  and  still  are,  to  have  angels  for  their  sup- 
"  porters  ;  as  also  that  many  dignified  prelates  were  in  use,  within  these  two  hund- 
"  red  years,  to  support  their  arms  with  angels." 

With  us  angels  have  been  frequently  made  use  of  as  supporters.  Cardinal 
Beaton  had  his  supported  by  two  angels  in  Dalmatic  habits,  or,  as  some  say, 
priestly  ones,  which  are  yet  to  be  seen  on  his  lodgings  in  Blackfriar's  Wynd. 
BoRTHWiCK  Lord  Borthwick  had  his  arms  supported  by  two  angels  :  as  also  Ker 
Lord  Jedburgh,  and  the  Earls  of  Lothian,  now  Marquis,  their  arms  are  supported 
on  the  dexter  by  an  angel  winged  or,  and  on  the  sinister  by  an  unicorn  argent, 
maned  and  horned  or,  being  the  same  with  that  which  supports  the  arms  of  Scot- 
land. 

The  supporters  of  the  kings  of  England  have  been  various,  and  taken  from  their 
old  devices  before  they  were  used  as  formal  supporters,  a  detail  of  which  I  shall 
here  subjoin  from  the  EngHsh  writers. 

Some  say  that  Edward  III.  was  the  first  that  supported  the  arms  of  England 
on  the  right  with  a  lion  gardant  and  crowned,  (being  one  of  those  within  the 
shield)  and  on  the  left  by  an  eagle  or  falcon  crowned  also.  And  his  grandson 
R. chard  II.  supported  them  on  the  right,  as  his  grandfather  Edward  did  ;  and  on 
the  left  by  a  hart :  But  these  do  not  appear  on  their  seals  of  arms  appended  to  their 
public  deeds. 

Others  again  affirm,  that  Richard  II.  who  began  to  reign  in  the  year  1377, 
was  the  first  King  of  England  that  used  supporters,  but  used  not  the  above-men- 
tioned harts,  but  two  angels ;  as  Jacob  Imhoff,  who  says,  "  That  his  successor 

Vol.  II.  O  o 


30  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

"  Henry  IV.  the  first  king  of  the  house  of  Lancaster,  carried  also  angels  for  hi: 
"  supporters  :"  But  others  more  confidently  assert,  that  the  last  mentioned  had  for 
supporters  an  antelope  and  swan,  though  neither  of  those  are  to  be  seen  support- 
ing his  arms  on  his  seals  given  us  by  Sandford.  But  these  supporters  they  seeai 
to  bring  from  his  devices,  which  he  had  on  his  horse-furniture  when  Duke  of 
Hereford,  and  when  he  appeared  in  public  combat  against  Thomas  Mowbray  Duke 
of  Norfolk,  m  the  reign  of  Richard  11. 

His  son  Henry  V.  is  said  to  have  the  arms  of  England  supported  on  the  right 
by  one  of  the  lions  of  England  crowned  or,  and  on  the  left  by  an  antelope  :  But 
on  his  seals,  given  us  by  Sandford,  his  arms  are  not  supported,  though  the  seal  of 
his  Qiieen  Catharine,  daughter  to  Charles  VI.  of  France,  has  (as  in  Sandfora's 
book)  her  arms  impaled  with  the  king's,  and  supported  by  two  antelopes,  both 
gorged  with  coronets  and  chains  thereto  affixed  ;  and  our  author  observes,  that 
these  were  the  first  supported  arms  he  found  carried  by  any  Queen  in  England. 

Henry  VI.  son  of  Henry  V.  had  his  shield  of  arms  supported  with  two  antelopes 
argent,  gorged  with  coronets  and  chains  affixed  to  them,  and  attired  or ;  as  our 
author,  who  says  they  were  so  carved  over  the  gate  of  Eton  College ;  though 
others  make  the  supporter  on  the  left  to  be  a  leopard  spotted  proper,  with  fire  is- 
suing out  of  his  mouth  and  ears. 

Edward  IV.  the  first  of  the  house  of  York,  used  several  devices  or  cognizances, 
to  show  his  descent ;  some  of  which  I  mentioned  in  the  former  chapter,  which 
s-ometime  after  he  used  as  supporters  of  his  arms.  Sandford  gives  us  the  following 
instances  in  three  several  places.  First,  "  On  a  window  of  Trinity-church  in 
"  Chester  his  arms  are  painted  standing  on  a  falcon  within  a  fetter-lock,  and  sup- 
•^  ported  by  the  bull  of  Clare,  being  sable,  crowned  and  hoofed  or,  and  the  lion  of 
"  March,  being  a  lion  argent  gardant.  %dly.  Over  the  Library  Gate  in  the  Uni- 
"  versity  of  Cambridge,  his  achievement  is  supported  with  two  lions  gardant. 
"  And,  3^/)',  In  Windsor  Chapel  they  are  supported  with  the  lion  of  March  and 
"  the  white  hart,  the  device  of  Richard  II." 

Edward  V.  son  of  Edward  IV.  had  his  arms  supported  with  the  lion  of  March 
on  the  right,  and  on  the  left  by  a  white  hind. 

Richard  III.  had  his  arms  supported  by  two  white  boars;  but  some  say  he  placed 
on  the  right  the  lion  of  March. 

Henry  VII.  representer  of  the  House  of  Lancaster,  and  restored  again  to  the 
throne  of  England,  supported  his  arms  on  the  right  side  by  a  red  dragon,  on  ac- 
count that  that  creature  was  the  device  used  by  Cadwallader,  the  last  King  of  the 
Britons,  from  whom  he  derived  his  descent  ;  and  on  the  sinister  by  a  greyhound 
argent,  collared  gules,  in  right  of  his  wife  Queen  Elizabeth  of  York,  of  which  be- 
fore :  But  on  her  tomb  her  arms  were  supported  by  two  angels  ;  and  their  eldest 
son,  Arthur  Prince  of  Wales,  had  his  arms  supported  with  two  antelopes. 

Henry  VIII.  of  England,  on  his  first  seal,  had  a  dragon  and  hound  as  his  father; 
but  afterwards  he  discontinued  the  greyhound,  and  supported  his  shield  on  the  right 
side  with  one  of  the  lions  of  England,  viz.  a  lion  gardant  or,  and  transported  the 
dragon  to  the  left  side.     His  son 

Edward  VI.  crowned  the  lion  with  an  imperial  crown,  and  had  the  dragon  on 
the  left  side.    , 

Qiieen  Mary  had  an  eagle  on  the  right  side ;  but  Queen  Elizabeth  restored 
again  the  lion  to  the  right  side,  and  the  dragon  as  before  on  the  left. 

Upon  King  James  VI.  his  accession  to  the  crown  of  England,  the  dragon  was 
discontinued,  and  in  its  place  stands  the  unicorn  of  Scotland  on  the  left  side  of  the 
achievement  of  England,  but  on  the  right  of  that  of  Scotland,  with  the  lion  of  Eng- 
land on  the  left :  each  supporting  the  arms  of  these  kingdoms,  as  they  stand  mar- 
shalled. W^hich  position  of  diflTeient  supporters  is  to  be  observed :  That  is  to  say, 
in  marshalled  arms  the  coat  which  is  first  on  the  right  side  is  supported  by  the 
supporter  properly  belonging  to  those  arms,  and  those  on  the  left  by  the  supporter 
belonging  to  them  ;  but  if  they  have  none,  then,  for  beauty's  sake,  the  supporter 
on  the  right  is  doubled  on  the  left.  In  subjects'  arms  also  impaled  or  quartered, 
the  supporters  uphold  the  arms  of  the  family  to  whom  they  belong. 

As  for  the  use  of  supporters  on  the  plates  of  arms  of  the  Knights  of  the  Most 
Noble  Order  of  the  Garter,  which  are  placed  upon  their  stalls  in  the  Chapel  of 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  37 

Windsor,  (though  they  or  their  progenitors  might  have  had  them  sooner  else- 
where) the  same  was  but  geneially  practised  in  the  reign  of  Henry  VIU.  (as 
Ashmole,  chap.  75.  5-  3-)  there  being  only  two  instances  where  supporters  were 
added  before  Henry  \'I1L  the  one  of  John  Beaufort  first  Duke  of  Somerset  of 
that  name,  made  Knight  of  that  order  by  Henry  VI.  and  the  other  by  ANrnoNY 
WiDviLLE  Earl  Rivers  in  Edward  IV.  And  no  other  example  can  be  given  till 
Htny  Vlli.  in  whose  time  it  was  the  common  usage  for  the  knights  not  only  to 
have  supporters,  but  their  mottos  and  devices  engraven  on  their  phites  upon  theii 
stalls. 


CHAP.     VIIL 

OF  DI.\DEMS  AND  CROWNS  THEIR  ANCIENT  AND  MOEDRN  FORMS. 

WITH  the  Romans,  diadems  and  crowns  difTeretl,  not  only  in  matter  and 
form,  but  in  their  representations,  for  the  diadem  was  a  sign  of  kingly 
power,  and  the  cown,  of  subaltern  power,  eminency,  and  triumph.  After  the  sub- 
version of  kingly  government,  the  Romans  could  not  hear  nor  see  the  diadem, 
but  imprisoned  those  persons  who  attempted  to  honour  the  statutes  of  the  Roman 
kings  with  such,  as  historians  tell  us ;  though  the  diadem  was  with  them  but  a 
piece  of  white  silk  or  linen,  which  went  round  the  temples  of  the  head  like  a 
fillet,  called  Candida  fascia,  such  as  these  to  be  seen  about  the  lieads  of  Moors, 
for  which  in  blazon  they  are  said  to  be  diademati  ;  whence  the  imperial  double 
eagle,  from  the  two  circles  which  we  see  surround  the  two  heads,  is  said  to  be  dia- 
demate  and  not  Cjuronne  :  Yet  with  other  nations  the  diadem  was  a  circle  of  gold 
adorned  with  precious  stones,  as  it  was  afterwards  with  the  Romans.  As  the 
author  of  Observationes  Kugenialogica  says,  "  Enimvero  prisca  ilia  fascia,  linea 
"  nullo  artificio  operata,  nuUis  opibus  tumida,  nullo  accersito  lumine  corusca,  sed 
"  solo  candore  conspicua  fuit ;  cui  tamen  simplicitati  multa  cohoerebat  majestas  : 
"  Apud  alias  vero  gentes  magis  ambitio  aut  opulentia  prsevaluit,  apud  quas  fascia 
"  ilia  aurea,  et  quidem  gemmata  fuit." 

Crowns,  coronets,  and  garlands,  being  all  ornaments  of  the  head,  and  distinc- 
tive marks  of  dignity,  or  tokens  of  noble  exploits,  are  all  of  them  in  Latin  known 
by  the  name  of  corona.  The  first  Roman  emperors  wore  no  other  crowns  but 
garlands  of  laurel,  which  betoken  victory,  because  the  people  of  Rome  abhorred 
all  signs  of  royalty  :  But  as  their  power  and  ambition  increased,  they  began  to 
assume  diadems.  Antony  the  consul  presented  one  to  Julius  Cssar  ;  and  that  it 
might  the  more  easily  pass  with  the  people,  environed  it  with  a  laurel  crown : 
The  diadem  to  represent  his  kingly  power,  and  the  other  his  triumphant  victo- 
ries. 

They  likewise  had  radiant  crowns  of  gold,  being  circles  of  that  metal,  bright- 
ned  with  rays  or  points,  and  on  each  of  these  a  star,  the  emblem  of  an  heavenly 
crown,  by  which  they  showed  their  descent  from  the  gods. 

The  Emperor  Aurelian  is  said  by  Selden  to  be  the  first  Roman  emperor  that  pu- 
blickly  wore  a  diadem  of  gold.  Constantine  the  Great  used  the  same,  and  trans- 
mitted it  to  his  successor,  brightned  or  relevate  (as  the  French  say)  with  points, 
leaves,  and  arches,  topped  with  a  mond,  ensigned  with  a  cross  ;  so  that  the  diadem 
and  crown  may  be  said  to  have  been  united  on  the  emperors'  heads. 

Other  lesser  princes  and  great  men  were  anciently  in  use  to  place  their  triumphal 
garlands  and  radiant  crowns  on  their  statues  or  images,  as  badges  of  their  victo- 
ries, eminency,  and  high  descent.  Which  statues  so  adorned  with  those  and 
other  trophies,  were  religiously  preserved  and  esteemed  by  their  posterity,  as  ho- 
nourable ensigns  of  their  noble  fimiilies  ;  and  these  statues  so  trimmed  were  ex- 
posed by  the  Romans  at  their  festivals  and  solemnities  of  their  funerals,  as  we  do 
now  our  armorial  ensigns;  which,  after  the  subversion  of  the  Roman  empire,  came 
in  place  of  their  statues ;  of  which  I  have  fully  treated  in  the  first  part  of  this 
System,  chap.  I.  The  right  of  having  images  or  statues  was  allov/ed  to  none  but 
those  that  were   noble,  and  had  jus  imaginum  ;  and  from  their  practice  of  placing 


38  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

such  crowns  upon  itutues  came  the  custom  afterwards  of  placing  such  ornamenti 
upon  shields  of  arms. 

Crowns  or  coronets  may  be  said  to  be  in  or  on  armorial  bearings  four  manner 
of  ways. 

First,  As  essential  or  internal  parts  of  arms  ;  that  is,  when  they  are  the  principal 
figures  within  the  shield,  as  the  three  crowns  in  the  arms  of  Sweden  ;  and  Gran'! 
of  that  Ilk  with  us,  who  carries  for  arms  joules,  three  crowns  or.  Many  other  fa- 
milies through  Europe  have  the  like  arms :  But  crowns  so  placed  are  no  marks  of 
sovereignty  and  dignity  of  whatever  form  they  be. 

'2.dly,  When  they  are  additional  to  armorial  charges  within  the  shield,  they  are 
but  ornaments,  whatever  form  they  be  of,  and  no  ensigns  of  sovereignty  or  digni- 
ty ;  as  that  which  ensigns  the  hart  in  the  arms  of  the  name  of  Douglas,  and  that 
which  crowns  the  lion  in  the  arms  of  Ogilvie.  And  so  of  other  figures  thus  adorn- 
ed in  many  bearings  with  us  and  abroad. 

2,dly,  When  crowns  are  placed  upon  helmets  which  timbre  shields  of  arms,  they 
are  then  marks  of  sovereignty,  being  ordinarily  so  placed  by  sovereign  princes : 
But  when  they  are  placed  upon  helmets  by  subjects,  they  are  not  signs  of  dignity, 
and  only  show  the  bearer  to  be  a  gentleman  of  name  and  arms.  We  find  by  prac- 
tice that  many  carry  crowns  on  helmets  in  place  of  wreaths.  Menestrier  tells  us, 
"  That  that  custom  is  from  the  tournaments,  especially  those  solemnized  in  Ger- 
"  many,  where  knights  are  allowed  to  adorn  their  helmets  with  them ;  as  others 
"  also,  who  have  been  allowed  to  exercise  in  such  desports.  Hence  it  is,  says  he, 
"  we  see  so  many  German  achievements,  whose  helmets  are  adorned  with  crowns." 
And,  as  I  observed  before,  though  there  are  many  helmets  ordinarily  placed  upon 
the  German  shields  of  arms,  according  to  the  number  of  the  feus  by  which  they  have 
votes  in  the  circles  of  the  empire,  yet  we  see  but  some  of  them  adorned  with 
crowns :  And  the  reason  our  author  gives,  is,  because  some  of  these  feus  are  not 
privileged  to  carry  a  crown  ;  or  that  the  ancient  possessors  of  them  had  never  been 
at  tournaments.  He  gives  us  for  example  the  achievement  of  De  Fushen  timbred 
with  three  helmets,  where  one  of  them  is  only  crowned. 

The  custom  seems  to  be  ancient  and  frequent  in  England.  Morgan,  in  his  He- 
raldry, lib.  3.  page  45.  says,  "  That  crowns  above  helmets  are  common  to  many, 
"  but  under  the  helmet  to  few."  Sandford,  in  his  Genealogical  History  of  Eng- 
land, gives  us  the  arms  of  Roger  Earl  of  March  and  Ulster  in  the  reign  of 
Richard  II.  timbred  with  a  helmet,  ensigned  with  a  ducal  crown,  out  of  which 
issued  a  plume  of  feathers  for  crest,  though  he  was  not  a  duke  but  an  earl,  to  show 
his  eminent  desceiit,  being  grandchild  of  Lionel  Duke  of  Clarence,  third  son  to 
King  Edward  III.  by  his  eldest  daughter  and  heir  Philippa.  Many  other  modern 
instances  may  be  met  with  in  Guillim's  Display  of  Heraldry,  especially  in  the  last 
editions  of  that  hook,  where  ducal  crowns  are  upon  helmets  in  place  of  wreaths, 
by  earls,  viscounts,  lords,  who  commonly  have  their  respective  proper  coronets  be- 
low the  helmet  on  their  shield  of  arms. 

With  us  also  some  noble  famihes,  though  but  earls,  have  been  in  use  to  place 
ducal  crowns  on  their  helmets  for  their  wreaths;  as  the  Earls  of  Perth  and  Win- 
roN  having  also  their  proper  coronets  between  the  helmet  and  the  shield.  This 
practice  has  been  used  by  our  lesser  barons  and  knights  with  us;  the  family  of 
Pkeston  of  Craigmiller  have  a  ducal  coronet  upon  the  helmet  in  place  of  the  wreath, 
out  of  which  issues  the  crest,  which  is  to  be  seen  on  the  House  of  Craigmiller  for  a 
long  time;  and  several  other  families  do  the  same  with  us;  some  on  the  account 
of  favour,  and  others  to  show  their  eminent  descent,  as  the  younger  sons  of  our 
nobility. 

^hly,  When  crowns  are  placed  immediately  above  the  top  of  the  escutcheon, 
they  are  then  ensigns  of  sovereignty,  and  especially  the  dignity  of  nobility,  whose 
degrees  they  show  by  their  forms;  of  which  by  and  by.  But,  first,  of  the  crowns 
of  sovereigns,  which  are  either  imperial  or  royal. 

Inipenal  crown  is  properly  that  which  is  worn  by  the  emperor;  the  circle  being 
of  gold  adorned  with  precious  stones,  and  relevated  or  brightened  with  points, 
sometimes  flowery  at  the  top,  which  the  emperors  both  of  the  West  and  East  an- 
ciently placed  upon  their  golden  helmets.    Though  they  were  open  and  not  closed. 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  39 

vet  they  appeared  like  close  crowns  long  before  such  were  in  use  by  emperors, 
who  were  the  first  that  a  sumeJ  arched  crowns  topped  with  monds. 

The  German  emperors  used  close  crowns  first,  and  had  the  arches  and  bonnet 
very  high,  to  show  an  eminency  above  kings:  But  those  of  France,  in  emulation 
of  the  emperor,  took  the  same  form  of  crowns,  tdl  the  Emperor  Charles  V.  turned 
his  close  crown  to  the  foLin  we  see  it  now  of,  to  distinguish  it  from  other  royal 
close  crowns:  Thus  described  by  the  best  of  writers,  viz.  "  A  circle  of  gold  adorn- 
"  ed  with  jewels  and  precious  stones  brightened  or  relevate  (as  the  French  say} 
"  with  leaves  like  those  of  the  oak  tree,  (the  emblem  of  old  age  and  strength) 
"  and  closed  with  arches  curiously  wrought,  rising  from  the  circle,  environing  a 
"  rich  high  cap,  or  tiara,  open  on  the  top,  in  such  manner  as  somewhat  re- 
"  presents  a  mitre,  (some  say  a  crescentj  and  closes  with  a  globe  having  a  cross 
"  on  it." 

The  King  of  the  Romans,  and  Archdukes  of  Austria,  being  ordinarily  sons  of 
emperors,  had  their  crowns  closed  with  an  arch,  and  topped  with  a  mond,  since  the 
year  1477:  For  Maximilian  the  King  of  the  Romans,  son  of  the  Emperor  Fre- 
derick III.  had  his  shield  of  arms  timbred  with  a  crown  relevate  with  broad  leaves, 
like  those  of  the  oak,  and  closed  with  an  arch.  And  his  son  Philip,  as  Arcliduke 
of  Austria,  had  such  another,  but  relevate  with  points:  And  when  he  was  King  of 
Spain  he  had  only  an  open  crown,  as  all  liis  predecessors  Kings  of  Spain;  as  in 
Olivarus  Urediis  his  Collection  of  Seals. 

R(jyal  crowns  being  anciently  open,  and  worn  by  every  king,  but  now  being  be- 
ing closed  at  the  top,  tliey  call  them  imperial  ones,  and  themselves  are  said  invest- 
ed with  imperial  power,  altogether  independent  on  any  man. 

The  royal  crown  of  Spain  was  a  circle  of  gold  adorned  with  jewels  and  precious 
stones,  and  brightened  with  eight  leaves  of  gold  like  those  ef  the  oak  tree,  but  not 
closed  with  arches  till  Philip  II.  who  married  Mary  Queen  of  England,  and  is  now 
called  an  imperial  crown. 

The  crowns  of  Sweden,  Denmark,  Poland,  and  Bohemia,  were  all  relevate  with 
leaves  of  the  oak,  and  open  ;  but  are  now  closed  with  arches,  and  so  named  im- 
perial. 

The  crowns  of  the  kings  of  France  were  and  are  relevate  with  flower-de-luces, 
(the  figures  of  their  arms)  and  were  not  closed  with  arches,  and  topped  with  a 
double  flower-de-luce,  till  Charles  VIII.  of  France,  who  is  said  by  some  to  be  the 
first  that  used  a  close  crown,  on  pretension  of  being  emperor  of  the  Eastern  Em- 
pire; as  by  his  medals,  where  he  is  represented  on  horseback  with  a  close  crown 
upon  his  head,  with  the  inscription,  Carolo  imperatori  orientis,  victori  semper  Au- 
gusta: But,  as  King  of  France,  the  close  crown  did  not  belong  to  him;  therefore 
the  first  close  crown  for  that  kingdom  is  more  rightly  ascribed  to  Francis  I.  who 
wore  it  in  emulation  of  the  Emperor  Charles  V. :  As  the  author  of  Observationes 
Eugenirilojica,  "  Franciscus  primus  Galliarum  Rex,  Caroli  quinti  imperatoris  amu- 
"  lus,  laminam  aliam  auream  octo  liliorum  fiosculis  circumactum,  tot  superne  ra- 
"  mulis  concluserit,  ex  lamina  prodeuntibus,  &-  in  unam  aspicem  qui  lilio  superno 
"  terminantur  reductis,  adeo  ut  speciem  quandam  diadematis  imperialis  referat ;" 
and. for  that  cause  the  above-mentioned  emperor  altered  his  crown  by  making  it 
like  a  mitre,  and  ending  in  the  sommet  like  a  crescent. 

In  England  the  kings  of  the  Saxon  race  had  crowns  (says  Selden)  after  the 
fashion  of  other  nations  at  that  time,  being  a  plain  fillet,  or  circle  of  gold  :  And 
King  Egbert  was  the  first  that  brightened  it  with  points  or  rays;  but  Edward 
Ironside  topped  the  points  with  pearls.  William  the  Conqueror,  the  first  of  the 
Norman  race  of  kings,  had  his  circle  fleury :  But  by  his  seal,  given  us  by  Sandford 
in  his  above-mentioned  book,  the  crown  on  his  head  is  relevated  with  points  and 
leaves;  but  the  points  are  much  higher  than  the  leaves,  and  each  of  them  topped 
with  three  pea;ls  i  and  2,  and  the  cap  or  tiara  topped  with  a  cross  patee.  His  son 
WiUiam's  crown  was  only  brightened  with  points  pearled  on  the  top,  and  not  ac- 
companied with  flowers.  Again,  Maud  Qiieen  of  England  had  her  crown  rele- 
vate with  leaves  and  points,  but  the  leaves  or  flowers  were  higher  than  the  points: 
And  all  their  successors  to  Edward  III.  had  their  crowns  variously  relevated  with 
points  and  flowers  alternately,  sometimes  the  one  higher  than  the  other.  Edward 
in.  whom  I  just  now  named,  brightened  his  crown  with  flower-de-luces  and  cross 

Vol.  II.  P  p 


40  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

patees.  And  Edward  IV.  of  the  House  of  York,  was  the  first  King  of  England- 
that,  on  his  seal  of  arms,  is  represented  sitting  on  his  throne  with  a  close  crown  on. 
his  head;  and  on  the  reverse,  with  another,  on  horseback,  and  on, it  a  hon  passant 
gardant  for  crest :  Which  crown  was  relevate  with  flower-de-luces  and  crosses- 
patee  alternately,  and  arched,  as  I  could  understand,  by  the  seal  with  four  arches, 
and  topped  with  a  mond,  ensigned  with  a  cross  patee.  But  his  queen,  Elizabeth 
WiDViLLE,  had  over  her  arms,  impaled  with  those  ot  her  husband's,  a  coronet  (^not 
arched)  relevate  with  tour  cross  patees,  and  as  many  flower-de-luces,  and  betweeiv 
tliem  eight  flowers  of  a  lesser  size,  which  Sandford  gives  us. 

Edward  V.  and  Richakd  III.  had  the  same  crown  with  Edward  IV.  and  Henry 
VII.  and  all  of  them  used  the  same  on  the  heads  of  their  eiiigies.  Henry  Vill. 
not  only  had  such  an  one  on  his  effigies  on  his  seals,  but  timbred  his  shield  of  arms 
with  such,  whom  Sandford  observes  to  be  the  first  in  England  tnat  did  so;  and  the 
same  form  and  practice  continues. 

The  ancient  crown  of  the  kingdom  of  Scotland  was  of  another  form,  (as  our 
historians  tell  us)  that  is,  its  circle  of  gold  was  brightened  with  stakes,  or  pilcb,  so 
formed  by  Fergus  I.  after  his  victory  over  the  Picts,  whom  he  attacked  m  iheir 
camp,  and  broke  down  their  barriers  or  palisadoes;  and  that  torm  of  crown  con- 
tinued with  his  successors  till  Achaius,  who  entering  into  that  solemn  league  with 
Charlemagne  of  France,  relevated  with  flower-de-luces  and  crosses  fleury  alternate- 
ly, as  a  badge  of  that  memorable  league:  Which  alteration  is  not  onl^  attested  by 
'lur  own  historians,  but  by  foreigners;  as  Pet.  Grego.  de  Repub.  Limneus  de  Jure 
Pub.  And  Hoppingius,  cap.  6.  page  3.  has  these  words,  "  Acceptis  in  coron;e 
"  circo  quatuor  liliis  aureis,  cum  salutiferae  crucis  quatuor  aureis  sigms,  paulo  emi- 
"  nentioribus  partibus  intervallis  discretis,  ut  inde  Scotias  gentis  Christianse  reli- 
'*  gionis,  inviolataeque  fidei  observatio  omnibus  dignosceretur." 

The  crown  of  Scotland,  after  this  form,  I  have  seen  on  pieces  of  coins  of  Alex- 
ander III.  Robert  the  Bruce,  and  their  successors ;  and  the  first  time  I  met  with. 
It  closed  with  arches,  is  on  a  silver  coin  of  King  James  II.  where  his  eiiigies  is  re- 
presented with  a  close  crown  on  his  head,  and  topped  with  a  mond,  surmounted 
with  a  cross  patee:  And  in  other  pieces  of  his  coins  the  crown  is  not  closed  with 
urches,  but  open,  and  only  relevate  with  flower-de-luces  and  crosses-fleury ;  and  so 
on  all  the  coins  of  his  son  King  James  UI.  that  I  had  occasion  to  see:  But  on  the 
large  pieces  of  coin  of  King  James  IV.  his  head  in  profile  is  cro\vned  with  a  close 
crown,  as  are  those  of  his  successors. 

In  the  year  1734,  I  had  the  opportunity  frequently  to  observe  the  forms  ot  our 
regalia,  viz..  crown,  sceptre,  and  sword  of  honour,  by  the  favour  of  the  ingenious. 
Mr  William  Wilson,  one  of  the  Clerks  of  our  Council  and  Session,  who,  for  a  long 
rime,  was  keeper  of  those  honours  under  the  Earl  Marischul,  duiing  the  Sessions  oi 
'.Parliament.  And  in  the  foresaid  year,  in  presence  of  several  gentlemen,  aiui- 
quanes,  jewellers,  architects,  and  others,  whose  names  1  could  here  mention,  if  con- 
venient, I  drew,  by  their  assistance,  a  particular  description  of  the  regalia,  which, 
unknown  to  me,  was  sent  to  England  to  Guy  Miege,  who,  1  cannot  out  say,  has 
caused  print  it  truly  in  his  Present  State  of  Scotland,  17-7.  Bur  since  i  am  nere 
treating  of  imperial  crowns,  I  shall  add  a  description  of  that  of  Scotland,  espeeniUy 
since  it  hath  been  formerly  misrepresented  in  its  structure  and  form  by  writers,, 
painters,  and  engravers,  who  have  made  it  the  same  in  form  with  tlie  imperial  one 
of  England.     The  form  of  it  is  thus : 

1st,  The  imperial  crown  of  Scotland  is  of  pure  gold,  enriched  with  many  pre- 
cious stones,  diamonds,  pearls,  and  curious  enamellings.  It  is  composed  of  a  large 
broad  circle,  which  goes  round  the  head,  adorned  with  twenty-two  large  precious 
stones,  viz.  topazes,  amethysts,  garnets,  emeralds,  rubies,  hyacinths,  in  Collets  of 
gold  of  various  forms,  with  curious  enameUings;  and  betwixt  each  of  these  collets, 
and  stones  are  placed  great  oriental  pearls,  one  of  which  is  wanting. 

2dly,  Above  the  great  circle  there  is  another  small  one  formed  with  twenty 
points,  adorned  with  the  hke  number  of  diamonds  and  sapphires  alternately;  and' 
on  each  point  there  is  a  great  pearl. 

2,dly,  The  upper  circle  is  brightened  with  ten  crosses-fleury,  each  being  adorned- 
in  the  centre  with  a  great  diamond  betwixt  four  large  pearls  put  cross-ways;  but 
some  of  these  pearls  are  wanting :  Those  crosses-fleury  are  interchanged  with  ten, 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  41 

high  flower-de-luces  alternately  betwixt  the  great  pearls  below  on  the  points  of 
the  second  circle. 

This  IS  said  to  be  the  form  of  the  crown  of  Scotland,  since  the  league  made  be- 
twixt Achaius  King  of  Scots,  and  Charles  the  Great  of  France.  It  differs  from 
other  imperial  crowns  in  that  it  is  brightened  with  crosses-fleury  alternately  with 
flower-de-luces;  whereas  the  crown  ot  France  is  brightened  with  flower-de-luces, 
and  that  of  England  with  crosses  patce  alternately  wuli  flower-de-luces.  The  Scots 
crown,  since  K.ing  Jaines  VI  went  to  England,  has  been,  as  I  have  said,  ignorantly 
represented  by  herald-painters,  engravers,  and  others,  after  the  form  of  the  crown 
of  England,  with  crosses  patee;  whereas  there  is  not  orve  cross  patee,  save  tliat  on 
the  top  of  the  mond,  or  globe,  for  all  the  rest  are  crosses-fleury,  such  as  we  see  in 
our  old  coins  and  churches. 

O'.ir  crown  is  closed  thus:  From  the  upper  circle  proceeds  four  arches,  adorned 
with  enamelled  figures,  which  meet  and  close  at  the  top,  sur:nounted  with  a  ce- 
lestial globe,  enamelled  blue  seme,  or  powdered  with  stars,  with  a  large  cross  patee 
on  the  top,  adorned  in  the  exrreinities  with  a  great  pearl,  and  cantoned  with  other 
four  in  the  angles.  In  the  centre  of  the  cross  patee,  on  the  fore  part  of  the 
cro.vn,  there  is  a  great  pearl,  and  below  it,,  on  the  foot  of  the  polar  part  of  the 
cross,  are  these  letters,  J.  R.  V.;  by  which  it  appears  to  some  King  James  V. 
was  th3  first  that  closed  the  crown  with  arches,  and  topped  it  with  a  globe  and 
cross  patee:  But  1  have  shown,  before  that  K-ing  James  II.  on  his  coins  had  a  close 
one. 

The  tiara  or  bonnet  of  the  crown  was  of  purple  velvet;  but,  in  the  year  1685, 
there  was  put  in  a  cap  of  crimson  velvet,  adorned,  as  before,  with  four  plates  of 
gold  richly  wrought  and  enamelled,  and  on  each  of  them  a  great  pearl  half  an  inch 
in  diameter,  which  appears  between  the  four  arches,  and  the  cap  is  faced  with 
fimine. 

Upon  the  lowest  circle  of  the  crown,  immediately  above  the  furr  ermine,  there 
are  eight  small  holes,  two  and  two  together,  in  the  four  quarters  of  the  crown,  in 
the  middle  space  betwixt  the  arches:  To  which,  as  I  am  informed,  at  the  occasion 
of  the  coronation  of  our  kings,  they  were  in  use  to  tie  a  fillet  round,  beset  with 
precious  jewels,  as  a  diadem;  after  which  solemnity  they  were  loosed  from  the 
crown,  being  the  proper  jewels  of  the  royal  family  at  the  time.  The  crown  is 
\\\-\i  inches  diameter,  being  twenty-seven  inches  about;  and  in  height,  from  the 
under  circle  to  the  top  of  the  cross  patees,  six  inches  and  an  half.  It  always  stands 
on  a  square  cushion  of  crimson  velvet  adorned  with  fringes,  and  four  tassels  of 
gold  hanging  down  at  each  corner,  when  carried  to  our  parliament  with  the  sceptre 
and  sword.  vVliich  two  last  I  shall  describe  in  another  place,  and  return  to  the 
descriptions  of  the  crowns  of  other  sovereign  princes. 

Tlie  Dukes  of  S.woY  have  closed  crowns  with  four  arches  terminating  in  a  globe, 
surrounded  by  a  cross,  taken  by  the  Duke  Victor.  Am.\deus,  at  the  tiaie  when  he 
assumed  the  title  of  Royal  Highness,  after  the  example  of  the  Doge  of  VexN'ice; 
who  having  taken  upon  him  the  title  Kjng  of  Cyprus,  and  caused  his  ambassador 
at  Rome  to  bear  a  crown  closed,  the  Duke  of  Savoy,  had  as  good  a  title  to  call 
himself  King  of  Cyprus,  demanded  the  same  privilege,  and  had  it  allowed,  on  ac- 
count that  those  two  dukes  possessed  kingdoms  with  sovereign  dominion.  Now 
these  dukes  have  been  distinguished  by  the  name  of  Kings  of  Sardinia:  Other  re- 
publics, which  do  not  possess  kingdoms,  nor  have  pretensions  to  them,  as  the  Re- 
public of  Lucca,  have  only  open  crowns. 

The  crown  of  the  great  Duke  of  Tuscany  is  open,  and  the  circle  is  brightened 
with  points  alternately,  with  trefoils  and  a  large  flower-de-luce  on  the  fore  part, 
which  Pope  Pius  V.  put  onthe  head  of  CosmuS' de  Medicis,  when  he  honoured  him 
with  the  title  of  Great  Duke  of  Tuscany,  the  5th  of  March  1570.  And  on  the  inner 
side  of  the  circle  are  these  words,  "  Pius  Quintus  pontifex  maximus,  ob  eximiam 
"  dilectationem  ac  catholicae  religionis  zelum,  prEecipuumque  justitiae  studium  do- 
"  navit." 

The  crown  of  the  Dauphin,  the  eldest  son  and  heir  of  France,  is  a  circle  of  gold 
brightened  with  four  flower-de-luces,  and  as  many  leaves  of  the  oak  tree,  like 
trefoils  alternately  ;  and,  of  late,  has  been  closed  with  four  arches  after  the 
form  of  dolphins,  meeting  with  their  tails  at  the  top,  and  surmounted  with  a  high 


42  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

flower-de-luce ;  which  form  of  a  close  crown  was  presented  to  Lewis  XIV.  by  Ab- 
bot Brianville,  anno  1662.  To  pass  by  all  these  fancies  ascribed  to  the  nature  and 
properties  of  the  dolphin  which  the  ancients  have  left  us,  I  think  the  greatest  ho- 
nour done  to  him  is  his  being  carried  by  the  eldest  son  of  the  kings  of  i'rance,  and 
next  heir  to  the  crown  ;  and  that  may,  with  good  reason,  be  concluded  to  have 
proceeded  only  from  the  name.  The  Dauphins  of  Vienne,  Sovereigns  of  the 
Province  of  Dauphine  in  France,  having  taken  it  for  their  arms.  Dauphin  in 
French,  and  dolphin  in  English,  being  the  same  thing.  And  the  last  of  those 
princes  having  no  issue,  gave  his  dominions  to  the  crown  of  France,  upon  condition 
that  the  heir  of  the  crown  should  be  called  Dauphin,  and  ever  bear  a  dolphin  for  his 
arms,  wliich  they  have  accordingly  done  ever  since,  and  been  so  nice  in  preserving 
that  bearing  to  themselves,  as  never  to  permit  any  other  subject  to  bear  it,  except 
the  counts  of  Forr.es  r,  as  descended  of  the  Dauphin  of  Vienne.  But  in  England, 
where  that  rule  cannot  take  place,  there  are  several  families  that  have  dolphins  in 
their  arms ;  as  argent  on  a  chief  gules,  a  dolphin  naiant  embowed  of  the  held,  is 
borne  by  the  name  of  Fishek.  ;  and  or,  three  dolphins  haurient  azure,  is  the  coat 
of  the  family  of  Vandeput. 

With  us  several  families  carry  dolphins ;  as  Monypenny  of  Pitmilly  in  Fife, 
taken  notice  of  in  the  First  Volume  of  this  System,  page  357. 

I'he  crown  of  the  Prince  of  Wales,  the  apparent  heir  ot  England,  is  brightened 
with  flower-de-luces  and  cross  patees  alternately,  as  the  crown  of  England  itself, 
but  open,  and  not  closed  with  arches.  Upon  the  restoration  of  King  Charles  II. 
it  was  ordered  by  the  king  in  council,  "  That  the  son  and  heir  apparent  of  the 
"  crown  of  England  should  bear  his  coronet  brightened  as  before  mentioned,  and 
"  closed  with  an  arch,  adorned  on  the  top  with  a  mond  ensigned  with  a  cross 
"  patee,  as  the  Royal  Diadem."  Likewise  it  was  ordained,  "  That  the  Duke  of 
"  York,  and  all  the  immediate  sons  and  brothers  of  the  kings  of  England,  should 
"  use  and  bear  their  coronets  brightened  with  cross  patees  and  flower-de-luces  al- 
"  ternately  only,  and  not  closed  :  as  also  their  sons  respectively,  having  the  title 
-"  of  Duke,  shall  have  and  bear  their  coronets  only  brightened  with  cross  patees 
"  and  trefoils  alternately  ;  but  the  sons  of  nephews  shall  use  coronets  as  other 
"  dukes,  not  being  of  the  blood  royal ;"  as  appears  by  the  said  act  given  us  by 
Sandford  in  his  history,  at  the  title  of  James  Duke  of  York. 

Imperial  royal  crowns  are  ensigns  of  sovereignty,  and  ordinarily  placed  on  the 
top  of  the  helmets,  which  timbre  the  escutcheons  of  sovereigns ;  (but  otherwise 
placed  by  our  nobility,  of  which  afterwards)  yet  when  sovereigns  use  not  their 
helmets  on  shields,  then  they  place  their  crowns  immediately  upon  the  shields  : 
This  was  first  practised  in  France,  as  Menestrier  observes,  by  Charles  VII.  about  the 
year  1422,  who  placed  only  a  crown  on  his  shield  of  arms  ;  and  since  that  time 
the  practice  continues  there :  and  I  observe  that  the  same  is  also  practised  in  other 
kingdoms. 

Sandford,  in  his  Genealogical  History  of  England,  observes,  "  That  Henry  VI. 
"  who  began  his  reign  142 1,  in  the  23d  year  of  it  had  on  his  seal  of  arms  the  ar- 
"  morial  shields  of  England  and  France,  both  timbred  only  with  crowns  of  the  re- 
"  spective  kingdoms;  and  that  they  were  the  first  royal  escutcheons  he  could  meet 
"  with  so  adorned,  the  crowns  being  all  open." 

Amongst  Mr  Sutherland's  Collection  of  Coins,  I  did  see  a  piece  of  gold  coined 
by  King  Robert  II.  upon  which  was  the  shield  of  arms  of  Scotland  adorned  with 
an  open  crown  ;  and  the  same  practice  is  to  be  seen  on  the  coins  of  his  successors: 
But  King  James  II.  had  on  some  of  his  coins,  as  1  observed  before,  a  crown  closed 
with  arches. 

Queens  of  sovereign  princes  did  not,  of  old,  timbre  their  shields  of  arms  with 
the  crowns  of  their  husbands,  but  with  those  of  their  fathers.  I  have  observed 
that,  with  us,  King  James  II.  his  Queen,  Mary,  daughter  of  Arnold  Duke  of  Guel- 
ders,  had  on  her  seal  of  arms  these  of  Scotland,  impaled  with  her  own  the  arms 
of  Guelders,  and  only  timbred  with  an  open  crown  brightened  with  trefoils,  such 
as  these  which  now  relevates  the  crowns  of  dukes,  and  I  suppose  was  that  of  her 
father's:  Which  seal  of  arms  was  appended  to  a  charter  of  her's  to  the  Abbot  and 
Convent  of  Holyroodhouse,  the  i6th  of  April  1459. 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  43 

Menestrier  gives  another  instance,  "  That  in  the  church  of  St  Dennis  in  France-^ 
"  on  the  picture  of  Mary  of  Spain,  wife  to  CiiARLES  of  France  Duke  of  Valois. 
"  is  a  crown  mural,  (/.  e.  crenelle  or,  embattled)  to  show  she  was  descended  from 
"  the  House  of  Castile :  So  that  queens,  it  seems,  of  old,  by  their  ensigns  of  hon  ■ 
"  our,  showed  their  paternal  descent." 

Having  now  fully  treated  of  the  crowns  of  sovereign  princes,  I  proceed  to  thcsv 
of  eminent  subjects,  and  their  forms. 

Of  old,  none  but  sovereign  princes  used  crowns  ;  but  some  time  after  their  chil- 
dren, to  show  their  descent,  did  use  the  same  in  their  father's  life,  as  L'Oseau  ob- 
serves, till  of  late,  that  Dukes,  Marquisses,  fitc.  were  allowed  to  bear  crowns;  which 
allowance  had  this  rise.  The  children  of  kings,  of  old,  in  France,  were  kings,  and 
so  carried  the  crown ;  but  thereafter  they  were  forced  to  take  dutchies  and  earl- 
doms for  their  shares ;  yet  they  still  retained  their  crowns  to  declare  their  extrac- 
tion :  whereupon  other  dukes  and  earls  did  think  they  niiyht  likewise  assume  the 
same,  being  in  the  same  degree,  which  obliged  the  kings  of  France  to  distinguish  the 
forms  of  those  crowns;  as  we  now  see  from  L'Oseau,  chap.  5.  Des  Seii^neiiries:  And 
from  this  also  did  proceed  the  king's  calling,  all  such  of  the  nobility  as  bear  crow^ns, 
his  cousins,  as  the  same  author  observes. 

The  forms  of  the  crowns  of  the  sons  and  brothers  of  France,  whether  dukes, 
marquisses,  or  earls,  to  show  they  are  of  the  blood-royal,  are  brightened  with  flower- 
de-luces,  as  the  crown  of  France.  And  that  practice  has  been  under  consideration, 
when  King  Charles,  by  his  act,  (before  mentioned)  regulated  the  crowns  of  the 
princes  of  the  blood-royal  in  England,  that  they  be  brightened  with  flower-de-luces 
and  crosses  patees,  as  the  royal  diadem ;  whereas  those  of  other  dukes,  marquisses,  and 
earls  are  brightened  with  trefoils  or  leaves,  like  to  those  of  smallage,  both  in  France, 
Great  Britain,  and  other  kingdoms ;  of  which  afterwards.  It  may  be  observed 
here,  that  the  first  peers  that  used  coronets  in  Scotland  and  England,  were  sons, 
brothers,  or  nephews  of  those  kingdoms. 

It  is  the  opinion  of  many  learned  heralds,  that  the  crowns  of  dukes,  marquisses, 
&c.  (not  of  the  blood  royal)  which  timbre  the  escutcheon  of  their  arms,  are  not 
marks  of  noble  descent,  but  of  noble  feus  and  dignities ;  as  the  author  of  Obser- 
vationes  Eujenialojica,  "  Coronas  hodie  non  esse  indicia  nobilitatis  avitae,  adeo  ut 
"  nemo  ratione  nativitatis  jus  habcat  coronam  gestendi,  prseter  reguin  seu  impera- 
"  torum  tilios,  qui  jure  ipso  nature  principes  habentur,  &-  jus  coronse  principalis 
"  armis  imponendi  retinent,  cxteri  non  nisi  ratione  possessiones  territorii  in  corona- 
"  titulum  avecti  habeant."  Therefore,  with  us,  the  younger  sons  of  our  high  no- 
bility do  not  adorn  their  escutcheons  of  arms  with  the  coronets  of  their  fathers, 
because  they  do  not  succeed  to  their  dignities  ;  and  none  can  legally  use  coronets, 
but  the  children,  brothers,  and  nephews  of  sovereigns,  to  show  their  royal  descent. 
And  from  those  who  are  dignified  with  noble  feus  and  titles,  the  right  of  carrying 
coronets  cannot  descend  to  their  younger  sons,  except  they  succeed  to  these  feus 
and  titles ;  but  if  otherwise  they  assume  them,  they  must  place  them  on  the  top 
of  their  helmets,  and  not  immediately  on  the  shield. 

Others  again  adorn  their  shields  by  special  concessions  of  their  sovereigns ;  as 
the  Brandilins  in  Italy,  by  the  concession  of  the  King  of  Cyprus.  And  the 
kings  of  Spain  have  laws  and  edicts  very  strict  against  using  of  crowns,  by  these 
who  have  no  right  to  them  ;  notwithstanding  of  which  they  have  granted  several 
concessions  to  families  and  cities  to  adorn  their  arms  with  crowns ;  for  which,  see 
Obs?rvationes  Eugeniahgica,  at  the  title  of  Crown. 

The  practice  with  us  and  tlie  English,  of  using  coronets  upon  helmets,  in  place  of 
Wreaths,  by  the  younger  sons  of  the  nobility,  without  special  licence,  ought  to  be 
adverted  to  ;  though  they  be  not  signs  of  dignity,  as  observed  before,  neither  can 
they  be  proper  ones  of  a  noble  descent,  but  rather  marks  of  some  merit,  favour, 
or  tolerance. 

The  dignified  nobility,  being  temporal  peers  of  the  realm,  and  lords  of  parlia- 
ment, are  comprehended  under  the  word  lord  barm,  and  have  coronets  ;  of  whom 
there  are  five  degrees,  such  as  the  title  duke,  marquis,  earl,  viscount,  and  lord : 
And  these  are  either  declared  such  by  feudal  erections,  their  lands  being  erected 
by  the  king  into  a  dutchy,  earldom,  &c.  The  dignity  of  which  feu,  of  old,  did, 
of  itself,  give  the  honour  and  privileges  in  whose  favours  the  lands  were  so  erect- 

VOL.  II.  Q^q 


44  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

ed  ;  otherwise,  both  \vith  us  and  other  nations,  they  were  honoured  witli  these 
titles  by  a  formal  creation  ;  and,  of  late,  by  patents  of  honour  from  the  sovereign 
declaring  them  dukes,  marquisses,  earls,  viscounts,  and  lords,  taking  their  titles  of 
honour  from  a  country,  or  part  of  the  same,  viz.  a  town,  castle,  places  where  they 
have  estates  or  dwellings.  And  some  have  their  titles  of  honour  from  their  offices, 
as  the  Earls  Marischals  of  Scotland  and  England. 

To  proceed  then  to  treat  separately  of  the  coronets  of  the  fore-mentioned  five 
degrees  of  dignified  nobility  ;  they  differ  not  only  in  form,  according  to  the  qua- 
lity of  the  bearers,  but  according  to  the  nation  wherein  they  are.  For  though  the 
Scots  and  English  have  one  form  of  coronets  to  the  degrees  of  their  nobility,  yet 
they  differ  from  those  of  the  French.  In  describing  of  which  I  shall  begin  with 
that  of  a  Duke. 

The  title  of  Duke  came  from  Dux,  a  leader  and  commander  of  an  army,  who 
enjoyed  the  title  no  longer  than  the  command.  But  in  process  of  time,  great 
estates  being  annexed  to  their  office,  this  dignity  became  hereditary.  King  Ro- 
bert III.  conferred  the  title  of  Duke  on  his  eldest  son  David  Earl  of  Carrick,  with 
the  title  of  Duke  of  Rothsay,  anno  1399,  and  was  the  first  of  that  dignity  with 
us :  though  others  were  soon  after  dignified  with  the  title  of  duke  ;  as  Robert 
Earl  of  Fife  and  Monteith,  the  said  king's  brother,  was  made  Duke  of  Al- 
bany. 

The  form  and  ceremony  of  the  investiture  of  a  duke  or  earl,  Stc.  with  us, 
was  very  solemn ;  as  by  our  antiquaries  and  writers,  which  I  think  is  the  same 
ahnost  with  those  in  England  :  for  which  1  shall  give  an  account  of  both  their 
solemnities. 

With  us,  the  candidate  to  be  dignified  was  led  into  the  presence  of  the  king, 
or  his  commissioner  for  that  end,  in  ducal  robes :  and,  after  many  ceremonies,  the 
king  or  his  commissioner  girds  him  v/ith  a  belt  and  sword,  puts  on  his  head 
a  coronet,  and  gives  him  a  golden  verge  in  his  hand,  with  the  charter  patent  of 
his  creation. 

The  English  give  a  more  fuU  account  of  the  creation  of  their  nobility.  The 
first  duke  created  with  them  was  Edward,  commonly  called  the  Black  Prince, 
eldest  son  to  King  Edward  III.  who  created  him  Duke  of  Cornwall  in  the  nth 
year  of  his  reign,  and  erected  it  into  a  dutchy  ;  as  may  be  seen  in  the  charter 
of  investiture,  taken  notice  of  by  Selden.  There  is  no  mention  of  any  ceremony 
but  the  girding  with  the  sword  ;  and  ever  since  the  sons  of  the  kings  of  England 
have  been  Dukes  of  Cornwall  without  any  other  creation.  But  afterwards,  in  the 
charters  of  investiture  of  Lionel  Duke  of  Clarence,  and  John  Duke  of  L.\ncas- 
TER,  both  sons  to  the  said  King,  there  is  mention  not  only  of  the  sword,  but  of  a 
cap  and  coronet  of  gold ;  and  later  times  have  mentioned  the  verge  or  rod  of  gold. 
Our  author  say>,  "  The  girding  with  the  sword  is  to  put  him  in  mind,  that  he  is 
"  hound  to  defend  the  king  and  kingdom  in  time  of  war ;  and  adorning  the  head 
"  with  a  coronet  of  gold  is  a  token  that  he  was  a  counsellor  to  the  king  and  king- 
"  dom  in  time  of  peace. " 

Since  these  times  all  kings  have  created  dukes,  and  they  are  still  growing  more 
numerous.  The  manner  of  creating  a  duke  in  England,  according  to  English 
writers  is  thus  :  "  The  person  to  be  created,  having  his  hood  and  surcoat  on,  is  led 
"  betwixt  a  duke  and  a  marquis,  a  marquis  going  before  with  his  sword,  and  before 
"  him  an  earl  with  the  robe  and  mantle  on  his  arms.  The  mantle  is  of  crimson 
"  velvet,  guarded  about  the  slioulders  with  four  guards  of  frw/'/zf :  on  the  right 
"  hand  an  earl  bears  the  cap  of  state,  (the  same  as  the  mantle)  doubled  ermine, 
"  but  not  indented,  as  those  of  the  blood-royal  are.  The  cap  within  a  coronet  of 
"  gold,  adorned  with  leaves  without  pearls.  On  the  left  hand  another  bears  a 
"  rod  or  verge  of  gold.  All  the  said  peers  are  to  be  in  their  robes,  and  thus  to 
"  conduct  him  to  the  presence-chamber,  where,  having  made  obeisance  three 
"  times  to  the  king  sitting  in  his  chair,  the  person  to  be  invested  kneels  down  : 
"  Then  Garter  King  at  Arms  delivers  the  patent  to  the  king's  secretary,  and  he 
"  to  the  king,  who  returns  it  to  be  read  aloud ;  and  when  they  come  to  the  word 
"  investitnus,  the  king  puts  the  ducal  mantle  upon  him  that  is  to  be  made  a  duke  ; 
■■'  and  at  the  v/oxA gladh  cincturamus,  girds  on  his  sword:  at  the  words  cappce  is! 
"  chculi  cLirei  impositionem,   the  king  likewise  puts  on  his  head  the  cap  and  coro- 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  45 

•'  net  of  gold  ;  and  at  the  words  virgce  aureee  tradkionem,  he  gives  the  verge  or  rod 
"  of  gold  into  his  hand.  Then  the  rest  of  the  charter  being  read,  wherein  he  ia 
"  declared  duke,  the  king  gives  him  the  said  charter  or  patent  to  be  kept.  " 

I  shall  not  insist  here  upon  the  privileges  of  dukes,  but  refer  the  readers  to  the 
English  writers  upon  that  subject.  The  eldest  sons  of  dukes  are,  by  the  courtesy 
of  England,  stiled  marquisses  ;  and  their  younger  sons  lords,  with  the  addition  of 
their  Christian  name,  as  Lord  John,  Lord  James,  &-c.  and  take  place  of  viscounts  r 
and  the  same  practice  is  with  us,  though  not  authorised  by  any  laws  of  the  land. 
A  duke  has  the  title  of  Grace  ;  and  being  wrote  unto  is  stiled  Most  High,  Potent^ 
and  Noble  Prince.  Dukes  of  the  blood-royal  are  stiled  Most  High,  Most  Mighty, 
and  Illustrious  Princes. 

The  coronet  of  a  duke  with  us,  both  of  old  and  at  this  time,  is  a  circle  of  gold 
adorned  with  precious  stones,  brightened  with  leaves  like  those  of  the  oak  tree, 
smallage,  or  great  parsley:  Such  an  one  is  to  be  seen  adorning  the  shield  of 
Alexander  Duke  of  Albany,  brother  of  King  James  IH.  on  several  impressions  of 
his  seal  of  arms.  The  tiara  or  cap  of  the  coronets  of  all  the  dukes  of  England, 
Scotland,  and  France,  are  of  crimson  velvet  turned  up  eiinine  ;  but  the  turning  up 
ermine  is  not  indented,  because  that  form  belongs  to  the  princes  of  the  blood- 
royal. 

The  Saxon  word  Marquis  was  anciently  appropriate  to  the  Lords  of  the  Marches, 
frontiers  countries,  and  towns  upon  the  sea-coasts  ;  which  has  since  become  a  title 
of  special  dignity  next  to  that  of  a  duke.  The  manner  of  creating  a  marquis 
differs  little  or  nothing  from  that  of  a  duke  ;  and  it  were  too  tedious  here  to  men- 
tion them  again,  especially  since  these  ceremonies  are  in  desuetude.  The  first  that 
was  dignified  with  the  title  of  marquis  in  England  was  Robert  de,  Verx  Earl  of 
Oxford,  Marquis  of  Dublin  in  Ireland,  by  King  Richard  IL  in  the  year  1337. 
And  the  first  that  enjoyed  that  title  in  Scotland  were  the  Earls  of  Arran  and 
HuNTLY,  who  were  both  solemnly  invested  in  one  day,  (after  the  manner  of 
a  duke  above  mentioned)  with  sword  and  coronet,  at  Holyroodhouse,  the  17th 
of  April  1599,  their  titles  being  Marquis  of  Hamilton  and  Marquis  of  Huntly. 

The  coronet  of  a  marquis  is  a  circle  of  gold,  adorned  with  flowers  or  leaves,  as 
a  duke's,  and  points  with  pearls  on  them  ;  but  the  leaves  are  higher  than  the 
points  pearled.  A  marquis's  mantle  has  only  three  guards  of  ermine  and  a  half, 
to  distinguish  it  from  a  duke's,  which  has  four.  Tlie  title  given  him  in  writing,  is, 
Most  Noble,  Most  Honourable,  and  Potent  Prince.  By  the  king  they  are  stiled 
Our  Right  Trusty  and  Entirely  Beloved  Cousins.  The  honour  is,  like  the  others, 
hereditary;  and  the  eldest  son  of  a  marquis  is,  by  the  courtesy  of  the  land,  called 
Earl  or  Lord  of  a  place ;  but  the  younger  sons  are  called  Lord  John,  Lord  Thomas, 
or  the  like. 

The  marquisses  in  France  for  their  coronet  have  a  circle  of  gold  adorned  with 
jewels,  and  brightened  with  four  flowers  (like  those  of  the  marquisses.  in  Britain) 
between  twelve  points,  each  topped  with  a  pearl. 

The  title  of  Earl  is  more  ancient  than  thjit  of  a  Duke,  or  any  of  the  five  titles 
of  dignity  before  mentioned.  It  is  said,  by  Selden  and  others,  to  have  come  from 
the  Saxon  word  Ear-etbtl,  which  in  time  was  abridged  to  Ear-el,  and  afterwards, 
by  abbreviation,  to  Earl,  signifying  Noble  of  Honour.  Some  bring  it  from  the 
Saxon  word  Elderman,  a  judge,  being  of  the  same  degree  with  the  Latin  Comes,  by 
some  called  a  Count,  when  speaking  of  foreigners  ;  and  the  same  is  still  preserved 
in  the  consorts  of  our  Earls,  who  are  called  Countesses. 

Earls  were  very  anciently  with  us,  even  in  the  time  of  King  Malcolm  U.  as 
appears  by  several  passages  of  our  laws  and  histories.  Torfaeus,  in  his  History  of 
Orkney,  speaks  of  one  Melbrigidus  comes  in  Scotia,  before  the  year  900,  and  of 
another  Meldunus.  Fordun,  another  historian  of  our  country,  tell  us,  "  That 
"  Kenneth  III.  King  of  Scotland,  was  killed  by  Finel,  daughter  of  Gruchin  Earl 
"  of  Angus.  "  And  Sir  James  Dalrymple,  in  his  Collections,  is  of  opinion,  "  That 
"  there  might  be  such  earls  with  us  of  old  :  But  the  dignity  was  not  annexed  to 
"  their  families,  nor  hereditary  to  their  descendants,  till  the  reign  of  .Malcolm 
"  III.  after  whom  there  is  frequent  mention  made  of  earls,  and  a  constant  succes- 
"  sion  of  that  honour  in  families,  that  possessed  great  lands  and  baronies  in  the 
"  kingdom.  " 


46  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

By  our  old  charters  and  evidents,  it  appears  that  the  title  Comes  was  only  added 
to  the  Christian  name,  without  mentioning  then-  lands  ;  as  in  the  charter  of  Ivnig 
Alexander  I.  to  the  church  of  Scoon  ;  the  witnesses  there  are  Malus  comes,  Madncb 
comes,  who  were  Earls  of  Strathern  and  Athol.  This  charter  was  about  the  year 
1115  :  as  Sir  James  Dalrymple,  Collect.  Appendix,  page  373. 

In  England  the  same  practice  was,  as  Selden  observes ;  of  which  he  gives 
several  instances  :  A?  AUunits  comes,  Rogerus  comes,  which  continued  to  the  reign 
of  Richard  I.  who  ascended  the  throne  in  the  year  1180;  and  then  the  earls  vi'ere 
designed  after  their  countries  and  lands. 

In  Britain  there  have  been  Earls,  or  Counts  Palatines,  who  had  a  more  eminent 
and  royal  authority  within  their  territories  than  the  ordinary  earls ;  as  the  Count 
Palatine  of  the  Rhine  in  Germany  is  preferable  to  ordinary  counts  there.  In  Eng- 
land we  find  mentioned  the  Earls  Palatines  of  Chester,  Pembroke,  and  Durham  : 
These,  says  Segar,  had  royal  power  within  their  own  jurisdiction :  The  first  of  whom, 
Hugh  Lupus,  was  made  Earl  of  Chester  by  William  the  Conqueror,  and  the 
county  of  Lancaster  was  made  Palatine  by  Edward  III.  as  our  last  mentioned  au- 
thor tells  us,  "  That  the  Earl  Palatine  of  Lancaster  had  under  him  barons,  chan- 
"  eery,  and  great  seal ;  and  the  same  had  the  bishops  of  Durham  and  Ely.  "  The 
offices  of  the  barons  were  to  sit  in  council  and  parliament  with  their  earls  in  their 
respective  palaces ;  and  for  magnificence  these  earls  kept  their  grandeur  and  festi- 
val days  in  their  provinces,  as  absolute  princes.  Our  author  here  calls  their  place 
of  residence  a  palace,  which  cannot  be  so  said  of  ordmary  earls  :  And  I  cannot  but 
take  notice,  that  King  James  VII.  in  his  charter  of  erection  of  the  earldom  of 
Winton  and  lordship  of  Seaton  into  a  free  regality,  through  all  the  charter  calls  the 
house  of  Staton  prilatiu?!!,  a  palace;  and,  with  submission,  I  think  that  those  earls 
whose  earldoms  are  erected  into  a  regality,  may  be  understood  Palatines.  We 
find  few  or  none  called  Earls  Palatines,  mentioned  in  our  records,  but  Walterus 
Comes  Pal atinus  de  Strachan;  and  Sir  George  Mackenzie  gives  this  reason  why 
they  were  so  few,  "  Because  the  Lords  of  the  Regality  had  the  same  power. " 

The  manner  of  creation  of  earls  is  the  same  almost  with  that  of  a  duke.  The 
robes  of  state  almost  the  same,  and  honoured  by  the  cincture  of  the  sword,  impo- 
sition of  a  cap  and  coronet  of  gold  on  their  beads,  with  a  verge  of  gold  put  into 
their  hands.  The  robes  and  mantles  are  of  crimson  velvet,  doubled  vi^ith  ermine, 
as  those  of  dukes  or  marquises,  but  have  only  three  guards  of  ermine  ;  and  the  cap 
is  also  of  crimson  faced  up  ermine,  called  galerus  or  beretum,  especially  with  the 
Germans  :  with  the  English  the  coronet  is  a  circle  of  gold,  enriched  with  stones  of 
several  colours,  of  old  not  brightened  either  with  points  or  flowers,  as  Sandford  ob- 
serves in  his  Genealogical  History  of  the  Kings  and  Nobles  of  England,  as  by 
those  coronets  on  the  effigies  of  the  deceast  Earls,  Henry  Lacy  of  Lincoln,  and 
William  de  Valence,  whose  circles  were  not  brightened.  And  that  the  first  circle 
or  coronet  brightened  with  leaves  or  flowers,  was  that  of  John  of  Ekham  second 
son  to  Edward  II.  who  was  created  Earl  of  Cornwall  by  his  brother  Edward  III. 
the  second  year  of  his  reign. 

Of  what  forms,  of  old,  were  the  coronets  of  our  ordinary  earls,  I  cannot  be  posi- 
tive ;  but  in  latter  times  they  are  the  same,  as  now  used  by  the  English,  viz.  a  circle 
of  gold  adorned  with  jewels,  and  brightened  with  points  topped  with  pearls,  alter- 
nately with  flowers,  like  these  of  the  marquises,  but  the  points  are  higher  than 
the  flowers,  for  difference.  The  title  to  an  earl  is.  Right  Honourable  and  Truly 
Noble  Lord. 

French  earls  or  counts,  according  to  Columbier,  wear  only  on  their  shield  of 
arms,  and  not  elsewhere,  their  coronets  of  gold,  brightened  with  nine  large 
pearls,  raised  on  points  above  the  rim.  And  other  writers  since  Columbier  tell 
us,  "  That  the  counts  in  France  have  their  circles  brightened  with  nine  great 
"  pearls  only." 

The  immediate  degree  of  dignity  next  to  that  of  an  Earl  is  a  Viscount,  in  Latin, 
Vicecomes,  quasi  Gubernaturiis  coviitatum,  a  lieutenant -to  an  earl  or  count,  and  so 
was  only  officiary,  and  the  same  with  sherifl"  of  a  county  or  shire.  Some  of  them 
(as  Selden  writes)  having  obtained  a  feudal  gift  by  inheritance  or  usurpation,  in 
their  jurisdictions,  by  these  means  they  obtained  a  setrl  d  dignity,  which  kings 
afterwards  bestowed  on  others.     For  having  in  their  hands  old  dutchies  and  coun- 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  47 

ties  by  forfeiture,  recognition,  or  otherwise,  they  erected  out  of  them  this  feudal 
dignity.  In  France  and  Spain  there  are  several  nobles  of  this  dignity,  but  none  in 
Germany ;  nor  were  any  with  us  till  the  year  1606,  that  King  James  VI. 
created  Thomas  Lord  Erskine  Viscount  of  Eenton,  (now  Earl  ot  Kelly),  and 
John  Ramsay  Viscount  of  HADDiKoroN,  afterwards  Earl  of  HuLutRNESs  in  Eng- 
land. The  reason  Sir  George  Muckenz-ie  gives  for  that  dignity  being  so  late 
with  us,  is,  because  our  kings  gave  not  the  government  of  counties  and  shires 
to  earls,  but  appointed  sherids,  who  depended  upon  themselves.  The  cere- 
monies of  creation  of  a  viscount  with  us  is  the  same  almost  with  an  earl, 
with  this  distinction,  that  the  robes  of  a  viscount  have  two  burs  and  a  half 
only. 

The  coronets  of  viscounts  with  us  are  a  circle  of  gold  adorned  with  dia- 
monds, and  brightened  with  thirteen  great  pearls  only,  without  either  points  or 
flowers. 

Some  French  heralds  give  to  their  vi&counts  only  a  plain  circle  of  gold  :  but 
Favin  brightens  the  rim  of  it  with  pearls,  and  ordinarily  with  four  :  as  the  author 
oi  Obseivationes  Kugdniulogicis:,  thus,  "  Laminam  auream  nudam,  vel  quatuor  tan- 
"  turn  unionibus  conspicuam."  Menestrier  brightens  their  circles  with  nine  pearls, 
3,  3,  and  3  together. 

To  let  us  see  what  the  Enghsh  say,  besides  Segar,  Guillim,  and  others,  I  shall 
give  the  words  of  the  author  of  the  New  Dictionary  of  Heraldry  lately  printed. 
"  Viscounts,  in  Latin  Vicecomites,  says  he,  are  well  known  to  have  been  no  other 
"  than  deputies  or  lieutenants  to  earls  or  counts,  as  proconsuls  were  the  degree 
"  under  consuls.  There  were  no  such  in  England  before  the  reign  of  Henry  VI. 
"who,  in  his  i8th  year,  created  John  de  Belmont  a  Viscount ;  and  it  is  since  bc- 
"  come  a  name  of  dignity  between  an  earl  and  a  baron,  as  the  marquis  is  between 
"  the  duke  and  the  earl ;  whereas  formerly  it  was  only  a  name  of  office  ;  for  the 
"  sheriffs  were  called  Vicecomites,  as  being  vicegerents  to  the  earls,  on  whom  the 
"  several  counties  depended.  The  ceremony  of  his  creation  is  so  much  the  same 
"  with  that  of  a  baron  that  it  is  needless  to  repeat  it  here.  He  has  also  a  sLir- 
"  coat,  hood,  mantle,  verge,  cap,  and  coronet ;  the  doubling  of  the  cap  all  white 
"  without  spots,  as  are  the  guards  of  his  mantle,  being  two  and  a  half,  to  dis- 
"  tinguish  him  from  a  baron,  who  has  but  two  ;  and  that  fur  is  called  miniver, 
"  being  made  up  of  the  bellies  of  squirrels.  The  rim  of  his  coronet  of  gold  is  set 
"  round  with  pearls,  not  confined  to  any  number ;  which  is  another  distinction 
"  from  a  baron,  who  has  but  six  ;  but  they  must  not  be  raised  above  the  said  rim. 
"  The  title  given  him  is  Right  Honourable,  and  Truly  Noble,  or  Potent  Lord. 
"  He  has  the  privilege  of  having  a  cover  of  essay  held  under  his  cup  when  he 
"  drinks,  and  a  traverse  in  his  own  house ;  and  a  viscountess  may  have  her  gown 
"  borne  up  in  the  presence  of  a  countess  by  a  woman,  and  out  of  it  by  a  man.  The 
"  eldest  son  of  a  viscount  has  no  title  of  peerage,  nor  are  his  daughters  ladies ;  but 
"  his  eldest  son  and  daughter  take  place  of  all  gentry,  and  before  those  of  a  baron. 
"  In  France,  according  to  Columbier,  viscounts  have  only  a  circle  of  gold,  or  a  co- 
"  ronet  enamelled  with  four  large  pearls  on  it. " 

Again,  the  said  Dictionary  tells  us,  "  That  a  viscount's  coronet  has  neither 
"  flowers,  nor  points  raised  above  the  circle,  like  the  other  superior  degrees,  but 
"  only  pearls  placed  on  the  circle  itself,  without  any  limited  number,  which  is  his 
"  prerogative  above  the  baron.  " 

Matthew  Carter  narrates,  "  That  this  title  of  viscount  is  derived  from  the  same 
"  order  in  France  :  And  that  viscounts  at  first  were  only  substitutes  to  earls  ; 
"  till  getting  themselves  into  power,  got  also  to  have  the  title  Honorary  and  He- 
"  reditary,  between  the  earl  and  baron  ;"  it  being  the  same  word  which  signifieth 
our  sheriff,  and  began  not  in  England  till  about  the  i8th  year  of  King  Henry  the 
VL  who  then  created  John  Lord  Beaumont  Viscount  of  Beaumont,  by  letters 
patent. 

Though  Sir  John  Feme  tells  us  of  it  in  the  time  of  King  Henry  L  and  King 
Stephen  ;  and  though  the  elder  sons  of  dukes  are  stiled  earls  during  their  father's 
lifetime,  as  also  the  eldest  sons  of  marquisses  are  stiled  by  their  fathers  viscounties 
and  baronies,  and  called  lords,  and  the  younger  sons  saluted  with  lord,  yet  it  is  by 
courtesy  only  that  they  assume  these  titles. 

Vol.  II.  R  r 


4i  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

To  this  degree  ot"  a  viscount  was  allowed  (by  the  Parhament  of  England  in 
the  reign  of  King  James  I.  monarch  of  Great  Britain)  a  surcoat,  mantle,  hood, 
and  a  circulet,  without  either  flowers  or  points  as  foresaid,  and  is  created  with 
the  same  ceremonies  that  those  of  a  higher  dignity  and  title  of  honour  above  him 
are. 

The  last  degree  of  our  high  nobihty  is  the  Lord  Baron,  or  Lord  of  Parhament. 
Which  title  of  baron  is  as  ancient  in  Britain  as  any  of  the  titles  before  mentioned, 
and  came  in  place  of  thane,  as  a  barony  did  for  thanedome  ;  since  which  time  the 
word  baron  denoteth  all  kinds  of  lords  of  parliament,  as  well  earls  as  others :  And 
baronage  is  a  collective  of  all  dignities.  For  now  there  is  no  duke  but  is  also  mar- 
quis, earl,  viscount,  and  baron,  and  so  are  those  of  the  dignity  of  marquis,  earls,' 
and  viscounts ;  and  all  of  them  are  barons  or  possessors  of  honourable  possessions, 
which  is  the  root  of  all  feudal  dignities. 

The  word  baron  is  variously  interpreted,  as  first  coming  from  the  Greek  word 
baria,  which  signifies  autboritas  gravis,  a  wise  and  discreet  man.  Bracton  inter- 
prets it,  robur  belli.  Again,  Sir  Henry  Spelman  saith  the  Gothic  word  bar,  barn, 
or  bern,  is  the  same  in  Latin  with  vir,  whose  derivation  is  from  vi,  force ;  and  from 
thence,  sunt  et  alii  potentes  sub  rege  qui  dicuntur  barones,  id  est,  robur  belli.  And 
taking  it  in  that  sense  we  now  understand  it.  Sir  Henry  Spelman  calls  him  aliens 
feodalis,  and  vassalus  capitalis.  "  Husjusmodi  sunt  (saith  he  in  his  Glossary,  page 
"  79.)  qui  pagos,  urbes,  castra,  vel  eximiam  ruris  portionem,  cum  jurisdictione 
"  acceperant  a  rege ;"  and  the  word  vir  or  homo  (as  with  the  English,  baron  and 
femme,  for  man  and  wife)  may  be  applied  to  those  who  had  territories  given  them 
under  the  tenor  of  homage,  as  becoming  a  man  to  him  that  gave  them,  and  were 
tailed  barons.  But  not  to  insist  farther  on  the  derivation  of  the  word  baron,  I  shall 
give  the  words  of  the  author  of  the  new  Dictionary  of  Heraldry,  lately  printed  at 
London,  1725,  in  octavo,  as  follows : 

"  Baron,  from  whence  derived,  is  no  easy  point  to  determine ;  the  Romans  hav- 
"  ing  had  no  such  dignity  among  them,  though  they  had  the  word :  and  Bracton 
"  says  the  word  barones  imports  men  of  valour.  They  are  the  lowest  dignity 
"  among  the  English  peerage,  but  were  of  great  power  and  authority  in  former 
"  ages,  as  may  be  seen  by  those  that  read  the  barons'  wars.  All  that  is  said  about 
-'  their  original,  being  only  guess  work,  we  shall  pass  it  by,  and  speak  of  what  is 
•'  evident.  All  the  peers  of  England  sit  in  Parliament  by  their  baronies,  though 
"  they  be  besides,  dukes,  marquisses,  or  earls ;  and  the  archbishops  and  bishops 
"  have  baronies  annexed  to  them,  as  abbots  had  formerly,  in  right  whereof  they 
•'  are  said  to  sit  among  the  peers.  But  there  is  no  doubt  of  the  spirituality  being 
•'  a  distinct  body  from  the  temporahty,  and  so  they  were  formerly  reputed  in 
"  England,  and  are  to  this  day  in  other  nations,  howsoever  they  may  be  here 
••'  looked  upon  now,  which  is  not  our  business  to  discuss.  Barons  are  divided  into 
"  three  sorts,  viz.  barons  by  tenure,  barons  by  writ,  and  barons  by  patent.  The 
"  barons  by  tenure  are  the  bishops,  who  enjoy  their  baronies  by  virtue  of  their  be- 
='  ing  chosen  to  their  sees.  A  baron  by  writ  is  he  that  is  culled  to  sit  in  Parlia- 
"  ment  by  the  sovereign  without  any  preceding  title,  of  which  there  have  been 
"  many  instances  ;  and  the  sons  of  noblemen  during  the  lives  of  their  fathers, 
■'  when  they  had  no  right  as  yet  by  their  birth  to  sit  among  the  p^ers,  have  been 
"  often  summoned  to  the  House  of  Lords  in  this  manner." 

"  The  manner  of  erecting  a  baron  by  patent  is  thus  :  He  appears  in  court  in  his 
"  long  robe  and  hood,  attended  by  several  persons  of  quality,  two  heralds  walk 
"  before  him  followed  by  Garter  King  at  Arms  holding  the  king's  writ ;  a  baron, 
"  supported  by  two  gentlemen  of  distinction,  brings  the  robe  or  mantle,  and  so 
-'  they  come  into  the  king's  presence,  kneeling  three  times.  Garter  delivers  the 
"  writ  to  the  Lord  Chamberlain,  which  is  then  read,  and  when  they  come  to  the 
"  word  therein,  investimus,  we  have  invested,  the  king  puts  on  his  mantle,  and  the 
"  writ  being  read  out,  declares  him  and  his  heirs  baions.  The  writ  is  gi\en  to 
"  the  king,  who  delivers  it  to  the  new  baron,  who,  after  returning  thanks  for 
"  the  honour  received,  withdraws  with  the  same  attendance  as  he  came,  to  enter- 
"  tain  the  nobles  that  introduced  him  at  dinner.  When  dinner  is  brought  up, 
"  Garter  coming  to  the  table  with  the  heralds,  cries  largess,  and  repeats  the  king's 
"  stile  and  titles,  and  then,  at  some  farther  distance,  they  again  cry  largess,  and 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  49.- 

"  proclaims  the  titles  of  the  new  made  baron  tlius :  The  most  noble  Lord  N.  N. 
"  Baron  of  N,  &-c.  and  then  bowmg,  they  withdraw,  crying,  twice  more,  largess, 
"  largess.  Where  note,  that  these  declarations  are  made  ni  French.  So  Mr 
"  Glover  in  his  Nob^  Pol.  et  Civ.  of  Barons  made  by  writ,  he  says  thus.  The  new 
"  baron  having  received  his  writ,  when  tlie  Hovise  of  Lords  is  sat,  Garter  Knig  at 
"  Anns,  bareheaded,  and  wearing  his  kingly  coat,  goes  before  the  said  baron, 
"  who  is  led,  by  two  of  the  last  barons  in  their  robes,  into  the  House,  and  brouglu 
"  before  the  Chancellor,  to  whom,  after  kneehng  twice,  he  delivers  his  writ  to 
"  read.  The  Chancellor  having  read  it,  congratulates  hmi  upon  his  new  honour, 
"  and  so  dismisses  him  to  take  his  seat,  which  is  sliowed  him.  Garter  still  going  be- 
"  fore  ;  and  the  Chancellor  delivers  the  writ  to  the  clerk  of  the  Parliament  to  be 
"  laid  up :  After  which  the  baron  enjoys  all  the  honours  and  prerogatives  due  to 
"  a  baron."     Glover  as  above. 

King  Richard  the  II.  was  the  first  that  erected  a  baron  by  patent,  in  the  year 
1388,  being  the  nth  of  his  reign,  wlien  he  conferred  that  honour  on  John  Beau- 
champ  of  Holt,  Baron  of  Kidderminster,  investing  liim  with  asurcoat,  hood,  mantle, 
cap,  and  verge,  being  all  the  same  with  those  of  a  viscount,  only  with  this  diffe- 
rence, that  a  viscount  has  two  guards  and  a  half  of  miniver,  and  a  baron  but  two. 
The  baron  is  not  girt  with  a  sword,  nor  had  they  any  coronets  till  the  reign  of 
King  Charles  II.  who  gave  them  a  circle  of  gold  with  six.  pearls  set  close  to  the 
rim.  The  title  given  a  baron  is  Right  Noble  Lord,  and  it  is  allowed  him  to  have 
the  cover  of  his  cup  held  underneath  whilst  he  drinks  :  and  a  baroness  may  have 
her  train  held  up  by  a  woman  in  the  presence  of  a  viscountess :  The  eldest  son  of 
a  baron  has  no  particular  title,  nor  are  his  daughters  ladies,  but  the  eldest  son  and 
eldest  daughter  take  place  of  all  other  gentlemen  and  ladies :  The  coronet  of  a 
baron  in  France,  says  Columbier,  is  a  circle  of  gold  enamelled  with  a  string  of 
pearls  round  about  it,  which  they  place  over  their  ai-ms. 

In  former  times  great  lords  and  knights  of  renown  used  ehaplets  of  pearls,  and 
did  set  them  on  their  heads  in  summer  or  hot  weather ;  such  was  the  chaplet  of 
pearls  given  by  King  Edward  the  III.  of  England  to  Eustache  de  Rjbeaumont,  his 
prisoner  of  war,  as  to  the  person,  that  had  fought  best,  and  forgave  him  his  ransom. 
For  they  mistake  who  think  it  was  a  count's  coronet,  the  same  being  only  a  pre- 
sent and  honom-able  reward  in  token  of  valour  and  liberty,  according  to  the  custom 
of  those  days. 

The  word  baron,  says  Matthew  Carter,  is^  a  general  title  in  England  (as  it  is  al- 
so in  Scotland)  to  all  lords  of  the  Great  Council  of  Parliament,  and  in  Naples  ani 
Lombardy,  where  all  those  lords  that  aa'e  called  titulati  are  in  general  stiled  barons. 
This  word  w'as  used  by  the  Danes  in  the  stead  of  thane,  which  was  among 
the  Saxons  a  title  of  honour,  and  being  next  the  king,,  he  was  called  the  king's 
thane. 

And  Selden  tells  us,  folio  87.  "  That  in  the  laws  of  William  I.  instead  of  the 
"  earl,  king's  thane,  and  middle  thane  of  the  Saxon  times,  the  title  of  count  or 
"  earl,  of  baron,  and  of  valvasor  are  used."  By  which  we  understand  it  to  have 
been,  though  not  in  the  same  name,  yet  notion,  a  feodal  honour  of  great  antiqui- 
ty. And  Sir  Henry  Spelman  says,  "  They  were  such  as  had  not  only  castles, 
"  towns,  or  great  part  countries  in  their  juridiction,  but  they  had  their  valvasores, 
"  (minores,  1  conceive  ;  for  there  were  then  valvasores,.  majores,  et  minores  ;  mUi- 
"  tes,  et  libere  tenenles')  which  should  signify  an  honour  of  command  in  the  com- 
"  nion wealth." 

It  has  been  a  common  opinion,  that  every  earldom-  in  times  past  had  under  it 
ten  barons,  and  every  barony  ten  knights'  fees  holding  of  him  :  But  those  knights' 
fees  (says  other  authors)  were  uncertain  for  number.  However,  we  find  many 
barons  created  in  the  times  after  the  coming  in  of  the  Normans,  that  held  both  of 
knights'  service,  and  of  the  crown  in  chief,  which  were  either  spiritual  or  tempo- 
ral ;  and  it  is  certain,  th?J:  all  honorary  barons,  from  the  Conquest  till  the  latter 
time  of  King  John,  were  only  barons  by  tenure. 

The  spiritual  barons  were  distinguished  from  the  temporal  thane,  in  time  ot  the 
Saxons,  by  holding  their  lands  free  from  all  secular  service,  excepting  trinoda  ne- 
cesshas,  (as  it  was  called)  ;  which  was  assistance  in  war  in  building  of  bridges  and 
castles ;,  and  this  continued  till  the  fourth  year  of  William  I.  who  then  made  the 


so  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

bishopricks  and  abbies  subject  to  knights'  service  in  cliief,  by  creation  of  new 
tenures ;  and  so  first  turned  their  possessions  into  baronies,  and  thereby  made 
them  barons  of  the  kingdom  by  tenure,  as  says  Mr  Selden  in  his  Titles  of  Ho- 
nour, chap.  V.  fol.  699,  704.  "  That  all  bishops,  abbots,  priors,  and  the  like, 
"  that  held  in  chief  of  the  king,  had  their  possessions  as  baronies,  and  were  ac- 
"  cordingly  to  do  services,  and  to  sit  in  judgment  with  the  rest  of  the  barons  in 
"  all  cases,  but  cases  of  blood,  from  which  they  are  prohibited  by  the  canon 
"  law." 

William  the  Conqueror  of  England  distributed  the  lands  there  amongst  his  Nor- 
mans, into  several  possessions,  called  counties  and  baronies,  to  be  holden  of  him 
for  military  services.  As  before  him  did  our  King  Malcolm  M'Kenneth  his  lands 
of  Scotland,  which  he  possessed  by  a  hereditary  right,  to  his  native  subjects,  in- 
to earldoms  and  baronies,  from  which  they  had  the  honourable  titles  of  earls  and 
barons.  And  these  again  distributed  parts  of  their  lands  to  their  followers,  called 
mi/ites,  who  likewise  give  part  of  theirs  to  other  men  called  vassals,  each  hold- 
ing subalternately  of  others,  and  the  barons  of  the  king  for  military  services,  and 
other  feudal  duties.  So  that  these  kings  knew  thereby  the  strength  of  their  king- 
doms, and  what  number  of  horse  and  foot  they  could  bring  to  the  field  in  time 
of  war. 

Barons  were  those  who  held  their  possessions  immediately  of  the  king,  and  were 
heritable  members  of  the  king's  council,  now  called  Parliament,  by  the  tenure  of 
their  holdings,  as  well  with  us  as  in  England  ;  where,  about  the  end  of  the  reign 
of  King  John  of  England,  there  arose  a  distinction  of  barons,  majores  et  minores. 
To  the  first,  as  being  more  potent,  particular  writs  were  issued  to  each  of  them, 
summoning  them  to  Parliament,  and  the  minores  were  called  by  a  general  sum- 
mons executed  by  the  sheriffs  in  their  several  counties,  whose  title  of  baron  dwind- 
led into  that  of  tenant  in  chief. 

From  the  reign  of  King  John  to  the  middle  of  King  Richard  II.  anno  1387, 
there  were  two  kinds  of  barons,  as  saith  Selden,  the  one  sort  by  writ  and  tenure, 
and  the  other  barons  by  writ  only.  The  first  were  those  who  were  actual  barons 
by  possession,  and  had  particular  summons  to  Parliament ;  the  other  barons  by 
writ  only  were  such  as  were  called  by  virtue  of  summons  to  Parliament,  though 
they  possessed  no  baronies. 

Mr  Carter's  account  of  those  two  kinds  of  barons,  as  in  his  Analysis  of  Honour 
and  Armory,  page  44,  45,  and  46,  take  as  follows,  "  Barons  (says  he)  by  tenure 
"  are  barons  spiritual,  as  I  said  before,  which  are  reputed  peers  of  the  realm,  and 
"  were  ever  first  in  nomination,  and  take  place  on  the  prince's  right  hand  in  Par- 
"  Hament,  being  capable  of  temporal  dignities,  and  some  of  them  are  accounted 
"  Count  Palatines  in  their  jurisdictions." 

"  And  by  tenure  temporal,  which  are  such  as  hold  their  honour,  castle,  or  ma- 
"  nor,  as  the  head  of  their  barony, ^d-r  baroniam,  which  is  grand  sergeantry :  By  which 
"  tenure  they  ought  to  be  summoned  to  Parliament.  See  Bracton,  lib.  5.  fol.  351' 
"  and  357.  But  he  is  no  lord  of  the  Parhament  until  he  be  called  by  writ  to  the 
"  Parliament." 

These  barons  by  tenure,  in  the  time  of  the  Conqueror,  and  after,  were  very- 
numerous;  and,  in  his  time,  as  I  conceive,  distinguished  into  majores  et  minores, 
and  summoned  accordingly  to  Parliament:  The  majores  by  immediate  writ  from 
the  king,  the  others  by  general  writ  from  the  high  sheriff  at  the  king's  command. 

But  they  had  also  another  distinction,  which  was,  "  The  first  were  called  only 
"  barons  by  tenure,  and  the  last  tenants  in  chief,  which  were  after  quite  excluded 
''  the  Parliament,  as  Mr  Camden  says,  fol.  122.  in  the  reign  of  King  Henry  111. 
"  by  a  law  made,  that  none  of  the  barons  should  assemble  in  Parliament  but  such 
"  as  were  summoned  by  special  writ  from  the  king.  And  that  King  Edward  I. 
"  summoned  always  those  of  ancient  families  that  were  most  wise,  but  omitted 
"  their  sons  after  their  death,  if  they  were  not  answerable  to  their  parents  in  un- 
"  derstanding."  But  Mr  Selden's  opinion  is,  "  That  not  long  after  the  grand 
"  charter  of  King  John  the  law  for  excluding  all  tenants  in  chief  was  made." 

From  whence  came  that  other  dignity  of  barons  by  writ,  the  king  summoning 
whom  he  pleased,  though  he  were  a  private  gentleman,  or  knight,  as  many  seculars, 
2 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  5i 

priors,  abbots,  and  deacons  also;  all  which  have  been  since   omitted,  that  held 
nothing  of  the  king  in  chief,  or  grand  tenure. 

This  title  of  baron  by  writ  is  by  some  esteemed  only  temporary  pro  termino  par- 
liamenti.  But  that  cannot  be,  for  the  ceremony  of  his  admittance  signifies  more 
than  a  titular  or  temporary  honour,  which  is  'this.  He  is  first  brought  by  the 
Garter  King  at  Arms,  in  his  sovereign  coat,  to  the  Lord  Chancellor,  between  two 
of  the  youngest  barons,  who  bear  the  robe  of  a  baron;  there  he  shows  his  prescript, 
which  the  chancellor  reads,  then  congratulates  him  as  a  baron,  and  invests  him 
with  these  robes,  and  sends  him  to  take  his  place ;  then  the  writ  is  delivered  to 
the  clerk  of  the  Parliament,  and  he  by  the  Garter  showed  to  the  barons,  and  placed 
in  the  house;  and  from  thence  is  this  title  allowed  him  as  hereditary. 

Since  these  two  sorts  of  barons  in  the  time  of  Richard  II.  another  has  been 
established,  viz.  barons  by  letters  patent;  which  indeed  are  now  more  usual,  and 
continue  to  this  day,  who  are  all  lords  of  Parliament,  and  of  the  last  degree  ot  our 
high  nobility.  For  the  said  King  Richard,  in  the  nth  year  of  his  reign,  first 
created  John  de  Beauchamp,  Steward  of  the  Household,  Baron  of  Kidderminster, 
him  and  the  heirs-male  of  his  body.  And  this  coming  afterwards  to  be  the  only 
way  of  creation,  they  had  (says  Selden)  commonly  creation-money  granted  them, 
as  Sir  Ralph  Boteler,  who  had  one  hundred  merks  granted  him  annuity  out  of  the 
county  of  Lincoln. 

Some  of  these  minores  do  yet  remain,  as  the  barons  of  the  cinque  ports,  barons 
of  the  exchequer,  &-c,  which  are  called  barons,  yet  have  not  the  honour;  such  are 
those  that  were  created  by  Count  Palatines,  as  the  Baron  of  Kinderton,  and  some 
few  others. 

As  concerning  the  descent  of  this  honour,  and  the  extension  of  it,  it  many  times 
descends  to  heirs-female,  as  when  there  is  no  special  entail  on  the  heirs-male;  yet, 
then,  no  husband  of  that  heir-female  shall  enjoy  the  title  and  honour,  in  right  of 
his  wife,  unless  he  have  issue  by  her;  as  was  decreed  by  King  Henry  VIII.  in  the 
case  of  Mr  Wimbry,  for  the  stile  of  the  Lord  Talboys. 

With  us  here  in  Scotland  there  was  no  distinction  of  greater  or  lesser  barons, 
but  all  were  admitted  to  come  to  Parliament  who  had  a  free  barony  and  power  of 
pit  and  gallows;  till  about  the  end  of  the  reign  of  King  James  I.  when,  by  an  act 
of  Parliament,  anno  1427,  it  was  statuted  and  ordained,  •'  That  small  barons  need- 
"  ed  not  come  to  Parliament,  but  only  two  commissioners  from  each  shire.  All 
"  prelates,  dukes,  earls,  lords  of  Parliament,  and  bannerets,  or  banrents,  to  be  sum- 
"  moned  by  the  king's  special  precept."  Here  we  have  the  first  distinction  of 
small  barons,  and  barons  lords  of  Parliament,  so  called,  because  they  were  sum- 
moned out  of  the  prime  barons  to  come  to  Parliament.  And,  shortly  after,  follow- 
ed their  solemn  creation  and  letters  patent  for  making  them  lords  of  Parliament ; 
the  form  and  ceremony  of  their  creation  being  thus : — He  is  brought  in  his  robes 
of  state  before  the  king,  or  his  commissioner,  by  two  of  that  order,  his  friends  car- 
rying before  him  a  pinsel  of  taffeta  rolled  up,  whereupon  is  his  crest  and  motto, 
and  next  a  banner  also  rolled  up,  whereupon  is  his  whole  achievement ;  and  after 
the  ordinary  oath  is  administered  to  him,  the  cincture  of  the  belt  and  sword  is 
performed  by  the  king  or  his  commissioner,  who  also  puts  into  his  hand  a  patent  of 
his  dignity ;  then  the  Lyon  King  at  Arms  proclaims  his  titles.  Sir  A  B  of  C, 
knight,  baron,  and  banrent,  lord  of  our  sovereign's  Parliament,  lord  ot  D.  But 
these  ceremonies  have  been  dispensed  with,  as  also  those  in  the  creation  of  higher 
dignities  these  everal  reigns  by-past;  and  the  delivery  of  letters  patent,  passing 
the  seals,  are  sufficient  now  for  that  end.  The  robes  of  lords  have  two  bars 
erjnitie. 

Lords  or  barons,  with  us,  as  well  as  in  England,  had  no  coronets  till  King 
Charles  II.  by  a  warrant  under  his  hand,  in  June  1665,  allowed  to  barons  or  lords 
of  Parliament  in  Scotland  a  crimson  velvet  cap,  with  a  golden  circle  decorated  with 
six  pearls  on  the  top,  equally  distant  one  from  another,  being  the  same  with  the 
barons'  coronets  in  England,  a  circle  heightened  with  six  pearls.  The  which  war- 
rant being  registrate  in  the  books  of  his  Majesty's  Secret  Council  of  Scotland,  I 
here  insert  as  follows. 

The  signature  following  being  presented  and  read  in  council,  was  ordained  to  be 
recorded. 

Edinburgh,  June  29.  1665.    "  Our  sovereigi^  lord  ordains  a  letter  to  be  made 

Vol.  U.  Ss 


52  EXTERIOP.  ORNAMENTS. 

"  and  passed  under  the  Great  Seal  of  this  kingdom,  mentioning,  That  whereas  the 
"  noblemen  of  higher  degree  of  this  kingdom,  by  titles  of  honour,  were  distinguish- 
"  ed  from  gentlemen  of  lower  quality,  in  all  coronations  and  parliaments,  by  scar- 
"  let  robes  and  other  marks  of  honour,  wherewith  they  were  adorned  at  their  crea- 
"  tion,  many  ages  ago,  witii  no  small  lustre ;  in  their  particular  degrees  and  places 
"  they  were  manifestly  known  to  be  different  in  their  several  stations :  amongst 
"  which  distinctions,  the  divers  forms  of  coronets  ordained  for,  and  appointed  to 
"  be  carried  by  dukes,  marquisses,  earls,  and  viscounts,  at  the  most  magnificent 
"  coronation  of  the  kings  of  Scotland,  added  no  small  ornament  and  state :  All 
"  which  considered,  by  reason  the  barons  and  lords  of  Parliament  of  this  ancient 
"  kingdom,  most  famous  in  former  times,  who  had  place  and  vote  in  Parliament, 
"  and  all  other  public  conventions,  by  heritable  right,  have  not  had  hitherto  any 
"  ornament  to  their  head  in  such  solemnities  as  became  their  rank  :  And  because 
"  it  is  just  and  reasonable  that  those  of  the  degree  of  peers  carry  a  mark  of  honour 
"  suitable  to  that  of  the  peers  of  a  higher  degree,  his  majesty,  willing  to  show  all 
"  those  of  that  degree,  in  time  coming,  his  royal  favour,  doth  by  these  presents  or- 
"  dain  and  appoint,  that  they  and  their  heirs,  barons  and  lords  of  Parliament, 
■"  made  or  to  be  made  at  any  public  or  solemn  conventions,  shall  have  and  carry 
"  on  their  head  a  certain  crimson  velvet  cap,  with  a  golden  circle  decorated  with 
"  six  pearls  on  the  top,  equally  distant  one  from  another,  on  the  day  of  the  coro- 
'•  nation  of  his  majesty's  suc'cessors  kings  of  Scotland;  and  also  in  all  time  and  place, 
•'  and  after  the  same  manner  that  the  viscounts  of  this  kingdom,  and  other  peers 
"  of  higher  degree  of  honour,  carry  and  use  their  coronets,  or  may  by  right  and 
"  custom  use  and  carry  the  same  :  As  also,  that  they  may  set  it  on  their  coats  of 
"  arms,  or  anywhere  else  they  please ;  and  his  majesty  ordains  these  his  letters 
"  patent,  that  they  may  be  the  better  known,  to  be  insert  and  registrate  in  the 
"  registers  of  his  chancery,  together  with  the  figure  of  the  said  cap:  And  also, 
"  that  they  be  forthwith  insert  in  the  public  office  of  the  Lyon  King  at  Arms, 
"  amongst  the  public  acts  thereof,  whereby  his  servants,  the  Lyon,  and  the 
"  heralds,  may  have  the  surer  knowledge  of  his  majesty's  command  and  com- 
"  mission,  to  observe  and  obey  the  same  in  all  time  coming,  so  often,  and  when- 
"  soever  it  shall  be  necessary,  or  occasion  shall  require.  And  these  presents  shall 
*'  be  a  sufficient  warrant  to  the  Director  of  the  Chancellary  to  write,  and  the 
-  Lord  Chancellor,  or  Keeper  of  the  Great  Seal,  to  append  the  same  thereto :  As 
"  also,  to  the  Lyon  King  at  Arms,  to  registrate  the  same  in  the  books  of  his  office, 
"  and  give  out  extracts  thereof.  Given  at  our  Coui't  of  Whitehall  the  2d  day  of 
"  June  1665  years." 

The  forecited  M.  Carter,  in  his  Analysis  of  Honour,  page  48.  tells  us,  "  That' a 
"  baron  of  England,  as  a  lord  of  Parliament,  is  reckoned  among  the  peers  of  the 
"  realm,  and  privileged  amongst  them  in  all  those  things.  As  first.  In  all  trials 
"  of  criminal  causes,  he  is  not  tried  by  a  jury,  but  a  bench  of  peers.  If  for  treason 
"  he  be  indicted,  and  shall  stand  mute,  he  shall  be  convicted,  but  not  prest;  but  if 
"  it  be  for  felony,  his  standing  silent  shall  not  convict  him.  Upon  any  trial  of 
"  peers,  the  lords  that  are  to  give  verdict  are  not,  like  a  jury,  put  upon  their 
"  oaths,  but  upon  their  honour.  A  peer  of  the  realm  is  not  to  be  empannelled  in 
"  any  jury  but  what  concerns  the  king's  inquiry.  Neither  are  they  to  be  arrcbt- 
"  ed  by  any  warrant  of  a  justice  of  peace,  either  for  the  peace  or  good  behavi- 
"  our.  Neither  is  he  to  be  put  upon  his  oath,  upon  any  appearance  he  shall  make 
"  in  court;  but  his  !>onour  to  be  esteemed  as  binding.  And  whereas  all  burgesses 
"  of  the  commons  are  sworn  to  suprcmacy,  the  barons  of  the  upper-bouse  of  Par- 
"  liament  are  not,  5th  Eliz.  C.  1.  with  many  other  privileges." 

Mr  Miege,  in  his  State  of  Britain,  tells  us  likewise,  "  That  the  nobility  of  Eng- 
"  land,  (now  all  those  of  Great  Britain  since  the  Union)  are  also  free  from  all  ar- 
"  rests  for  debts,  as  bein^  the  king's  hereditary  counsellors.  Therefore  a  peer  can- 
'  not  be  outlawed  in  anv  civil  action,  and  no  attachment  lies  against  his  person  : 
"  But  execution  may  be  taken  upon  his  lands  and  goods.  For  the  same  reason 
"  they  are  free  from  all  attendance  at  courts  leet,  or  sheriff's  turns :  Or,  in  case 
"  of  a  riot,  from  attending  the  service  of  the  posse  comitatus.  And  to  secure  the 
"  honour  of,  and  prevent  the  raising  of  any  scandal  upon  peers  by  false  reports, 
"  there  is  an  express  law,  called  sctindahtm  magnatum,  by  which  any  man  convict 
'?  of  a  false  and  scandalous  report  against  a  peer  of  the  realm,  is  condemned  on  an 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  53 

"  arbitrary  fine,  and  to  remain  in  prison  till  the  same  be  paiil.  They  have  other 
"  privileges  which  I  pass  by  for  brevity's  sake  ;  yet  none  has  that  of  the  granilec- 
"  of  Spain,  to 'be  covered  in  the  king's  presence.*' 

The  form  of  creating  a  baron  by  patent,  according  to  the  said  Carter,  ib.  page 
49.  is  in  this  manner.  "  The  king  sitting  in  state  in  the  presence-chamber  ; 
"  first.  The  heralds  by  two  and  two,  and  their  Garter  Principal  King,  alone,  pro- 
"  ceed,  bearing  in  his  hand  the  patent  of  creation  ;  next  to  hmi  a  baron,  bearing 
"  tlie  robes,  and  then  the  person  to  be  created  followetli  betwixt  two  other  barons. 
"  Being  entered  the  chamber  of  presence,  they  make  their  obeisance  to  the  king 
.  "  three  times.  Ciarter  then  delivereth  the  patent  to  the  Lord  Chamberlain  of  the 
"  Household,  and  he  to  the  king,  and  the  king  to  one  of  his  principal  secretaries 
"  of  state,  who  readeth  it,  and  at  tiie  word  iiivcstimus,  the  king  putteth  on  him 
"  the  baron's  robe.  So  soon  as  the  pvitent  is  read,  it  is  to  be  delivered  to  the  king. 
"  who  gives  it  to  him  that  is  creatctl.  Then  he  returning  thanks  for  his  great 
"  honour,  withdraws  in  the  same  manner  he  came  in,  the  trumpets  sounding ; 
"  and  so  he  goes  to  dinner,  where,  after  the  second  service  is  gone  up,  the  Garter, 
"  with  the  rest  of  the  iieralds,  cometh  near  the  table,  where  first  pronouncing 
"  largesse,  with  a  loud  voice,  he  declareth  the  king's  stile  in  Latin,  French,  and 
"  English ;  and  then  standing  somewhat  further  off,  pronounceth  largesse  again, 
"  with  the  stile  of  him  that  was  newly  created.  In  which  form  (says  Mills)  was 
"  H'lLLiAM  Cecil  created  Lord  Burleigh,  15th  of  February,  13.  Elizabeth." 

Silvanus  Morgan,  lib.  3.  p.  24.  observes,  "  That  the  circles  of  the  crowns  of 
"  all  the  degrees  of  nobility  are  of  one  form  (though  variously  heightened  as  bc- 
"  fore  described)  to  show  them  to  be  pares  regni." 

The  coronet  of  a  lord  in  France  is  a  golden  circle  adorned  with  bracelets  of 
.small  pearl. 

Our  learned  countryman.  Sir  George  M'Kenzie,  in  his, Science  of  Heraldry, 
page  91,  tells  us,  "  That  the  first  origin  of  crowns  in  arms,  was  from  the  Romans, 
"  App.  lib.  2.  de  Bell.  Civil,  for  they  rewarded  the  great  actions  of  their  citizens 
"  and  warriors  with  different  and  suitable  crowns,  which  1  here  narrate  out  of  the 
"  ingenious  Mr  Cartwright." 

Corona  muralis,  this  was  due  to  him  that  was  first  seen  upon  the  wall  of  the 
enemy.  The  forecited  author  of  the  new  Dictionary  says,  "  That  a  mural  crown 
"  or  garland  was  of  gold,  being  a  circle,  and  on  its  battlements  like  those  of  a 
"  wall,  given  to  him  that  first  mounted  the  breach,  or  any  ways  was  the  first  that 
"  broke  into  an  enemy's  town  :  which  honour  was  due  to  the  meanest  soldier, 
"  as  well  the  greatest  commander,  if  he  could  prove  he  had  been  the  first  that 
"  entered  the  place.  On  the  circle  of  this  coronet  there  were  lions  engraved  to 
"  express  the  undaunted  valour  of  the  bearer.  Again  there  was  the  corona  cas- 
"  trensis  for  him  that  made  a  breach  in  the  camp  of  the  enemy."  The  said 
dictionary  says,  "  That  a  vallar-crown  or  garland,  called  also  castrensis,  was  of 
'•  gold,  and  consisted  of  palisadoes,  or  the  likeness  of  them  standing  up  all  about  the 
"  gold  circle,  given  by  the  general  of  the  army  to  him  that  first  broke  into  a  for- 
"  tified  camp  of  an  enemy,  or  forced  any  place  pahsaded  after  the  manner  that 
'■  the  outwards  of  strong  places  generally  are,  and  therefore  the  palisades  were  re- 
"  presented  upon  the  coronet,  to  denote  the  exploit  performed  by  the  bearer." 

Again  the  Romans  had  the  corona  navalis,  the  naval  crown  or  garland,  which 
was  of  goLI,  adorned  with  the  heads  and  sterns  of  ships,  or  gallies.  as  aLo  sails  £cc. 
given  to  him  that  had  first  boarded  an  enemy's  ship  or  galley,  and  been,  by  that 
means,  the  occasion  that  the  same  was  taken.  With  such  a  coronet  her  late  iSIa- 
jestv  Queen  Anne  honoured  Captain  James  Moodie  commander  of  the  ship  Prince 
George,  to  ensign  his  helmet  with,  instead  of  a  torce,  and  thereon  to  place  his 
crest,  for  his  merit  and  great  services  done  to  her,  and,  in  particular  for  relieving 
the  town  and  castle  of  Denia  in  Spain  when  besieged  by  the  French  in  the  year 
1707  and  1708.     As  in  the  Appendix  to  this  book,  page  23. 

The  Romans  had  also  the  corona  triumphalis,  or  triumphal  crown  or  garland, 
which  was  made  of  laurel,  and  granted  only  to  generals  who  had  vanquished  their 
enemies  and  had  the  honour  of  a  triumph  granted  them  by  the  senate  of  Rome. 
This  was  said  to  have  been  taken  from  Apollo's  crowning  his  head  with  laurel 
after  killing  of  the  Delphic  serpent,  and  it  was  as  much  esteemed  by  the  Romans 
as  if  it  had  been  of  gold. 


54  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

Corona  ovalis,  oval  crown  or  garland,  was  made  of  myrtle,  and  granted  to 
those  who  had  obtamed  a  victory  with  little  hazard ;  and  was  first  given  to  those 
that  were  victorious  at  the  loHan  games,  instituted  by  the  Thebans  in  memory  of 
their  hero  lolus,  near  his  tomb  ;  and  therefore  this  was  a  mournful  garland.  The 
Romans  bestowed  the  same  sort  of  garland  on  their  generals  who  had  vanquished 
their  enemies  without  bloodshed,  or  surprised  some  important  place  without  strik- 
ing a  stroke,  as  also  on  those  that  had  subdued  slaves  or  pirates,  not  reckoned  worthy 
of  the  Roman  valour,  and  consequently  not  to  deserve  a  triumph. 

Corona  obsldialis,  or  obsidional  crown  or  garland  was  made  of  grass,  and  given 
to  him  that  held  out  a  siege,  or  caused  it  to  be  raised,  repulsing  the  enemy,  and  de- 
livering the  place.  So  Fabius  Maximus  had  no  greater  reward  than  this  crown,  for  hav- 
ing delivered  the  city  of  Rome  from  Hannibal,  after  the  unfortunate  battle  of  Cannx. 
Corona  civica,  or  civic  crown  or  garland,  was  given  to  a  brave  soldier  who  had 
saved  the  life  of  a  fellow-citizen,  or  rescued  him  after  being  taken  prisoner  by 
the  enemy,  exposing  himself  to  save  another.  And  this  was  only  made  of  oaken 
leaves  with  the  acorns,  if  they  could  be  so  had;  because  that  tree  was  dedicated  to 
Jove,  who  was  reckoned  the  protector  of  cities,  and  their  inhabitants.  This  crown 
was  made  of  oaken  boughs,  says  Sir  George  M'Kenzie. 

Corona  olivalis,  olive  crown  or  garland,  was  made  of  olive  leaves ;  and  was 
given,  among  the  Greeks,  to  those  that  came  off  victorious  at  the  Olympic  Games, 
kept  in  honour  of  Jupiter,  at  the  foot  of  Mount  Olympus.  But,  though  highly 
valued  amongst  these  people,  this,  and  others  like  it,  were  only  a  reward  for  run- 
ning, wresthng,  or  such  like  exercises ;  and  therefore  nothing  comparable  to  the 
martial  rewards  among  the  Romans,  who  also  gave  this  crown  to  those  who  had, 
by  their  wisdom,  reconciled  two  enemies. 

The  said  Sir  George  M'Kenzie  mentions  also  the  corona  populea,  which,  he  says, 
was  given  to  young  men  that  were  found  industrious  and  studious  in  the  exercises  of 
virtue.  But,  amongst  these  rewards  of  honour,  that  of  ivy,  called  corona  hederalis, 
was  only  appropriated  to  the  poets. 

The  aforesaid  Roman  crowns  or  garlands,  though  made  of  leaves  or  grass,  were 
as  highly  valued  as  if  they  had  been  of  gold,  because  they  were  only  bestowed  on 
such  as  had  purchased  them  by  their  singular  bravery ;  whereas,  of  late,  golden 
coronets  have  been  too  frequently  bestowed  upon  no  other  desert  than  wealth,  and 
even  that  sometimes  meanly  gained.  All  the  ancient  rewards  of  garlands  are  now 
expired,  and  it  is  well  they  are  when  so  little  regard  is  had  to  real  merit.  Favour 
and  affection  are  sufficient  to  advance  the  least  deserving,  and  very  often  those  who 
have  done  most  are  the  least  looked  upon,  if  they  have  not  some  powerful  interest 
to  support  them.  He  that  runs  away  sometimes  carries  the  prize  from  him  that 
fought  the  battle. 

There  is  another  ancient  crown,  being  a  circle  with  high  points  rising  therefrom, 
called  an  open  or  antique  crown,  which  Silvanus  Morgan  says  is  that  crown  borne 
by  Homager  Kings,  and  by  John  Baliol,  when  he  held  the  crown  of  Scotland  of 
Edward  the  I.  of  England.  But  I  beg  the  gentleman's  pardon  (says  Sir 
George  M'Kenzie,  ibid,  page  92.)  to  tell  him,  that,  of  old.  the  Roman  Emper- 
ors carried  no  other  than  these,  after  their  apotheosis,  and  being  numbered  among 
the  gods, 

Fulminibus  manes  radiisque  oniobit  &  astris.  LuCviN. 

And  generally  all  kings  of  Christendom,  of  old,  as  I  said  before,  carried  theirs 
iii  that  shape,  as  L'Oseau  also  well  observes. 

There  is  also  a  Turkish  crown,  if  we  may  so  call  it ;  for,  in  reality,  the  Grand 
Signior  has  no  crown,  but  instead  of  it  he  wears  on  his  head  a  great  turban  of  fine 
muslin,  held  out  by  a  wire  that  keeps  it  from  falling  together,  and  adorned  on  the 
sides  by  two  rich  jewels  of  diamonds  and  carbuncles,  with  fine  heron's  feathers 
standing  up  above,  and  costly  pearls  hanging  below,  and  sometimes  crescents,  or 
half  moons,  two  chains  of  gold  and  precious  stones  hanging  at  the  two  aforesaid 
jewels,  and  crossing  the  turban  before.  The  Bashaws  and  other  great  men  have 
turbans  of  another  sort. 

The  Doge  of  Venice  wears  for  his  crown  a  great  pointed  cap  of  cloth  of  gold 
■encompassed  with  a  gold  circle,  covered  with  precious  stones,  two  long  ears  or  lap- 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  55 

pets  of  the  same  cloth  of  gold  hanging  down  on  the  sides  of  it  pointed  at  the  ends; 
though  they  have  lately  taken  the  close  crown  like  monarchs. 

I  shall  only  observe  (and  then  have  done  with  this  chapter  on  crowns)  that  the 
name  is  originally  derived  from  horns ;  for  the  ancient  Jews  and  Gentiles  looked 
upon  horns  as  tokens  of  supreme  honour  and  power,  and,  in  scripture,  we  often 
find  the  horn  taken  for  royal  dignity  ;  and  therefore  Moses's  face  is  said  to  have 
been  horned,  the  same  word  in  the  Hebrew  fignifying  a  crown  and  a  horn.  The 
most  ancient  knights  and  warriors  wore  horns  for  their  crests  ;  but,  in  process  of 
time,  great  men  left  them  otl",  and,  instead  of  them,  took  crowns.  The  most  an- 
cient kings  wore  only  wreaths,  either  white  or  purple,  in  nature  of  the  present 
Turkish  turbans,  as  a  token  of  royalty,  or  else  circles  of  gold  with  points  rising 
from  them  like  that  of  the  open  or  antique  crown  ]  before  mentioned. 

And  now  having  sufficiently  treated  on  the  crown  and  coronet,  with  its  tiar  or 
cap,  1  proceed  to  the  ca()  of  state,  which  also  adorns  the  achievement. 


CHAP.     IX. 

OF  THE  CAP  OF  STATli. 

TO  leave  nothing  untreated  of  that  embellisheth   hereditary  achievements  of 
families,  I  have  added  this  chapter,  wherein  I  shall  describe  this  cap  of  state 
or  di^nitv,  and  its  ancient  and  modern  use. 

It  IS  of  crimson  velvet  faced  up  ermine,  with  two  points  turned  to  the  back,  nor 
unlike  in  figure  to  our  Scots  coivl,  so  called. 

It  is  frequently  used  in  armories  by  the  English,  which  they  say  is  from,  or  in 
imitation  of,  the  caps  of  the  Roman  generals,  who  having  obtained  a  victory,  and 
returning  in  triumph,  had  this  cap  of  state  carried  before  them,  by  their  most 
worthy  captive. 

It  is  now  called  a  ducal  cap.  For  the  wearing  of  this  cap  had  a  beginning  from 
the  dux,  or  duke,  who  was  so  called,  a  ducendo,  being  leader  in  war,  that  is,  ge- 
neral of  an  army  to  emperors  and  kings,  and  is  now  given  to  others  of  inferior  dig- 
nities, and  so  cannot  be  an  ensign  of  dignity,  but  given  as  a  token  of  triumph  and 
victory. 

Yet,  of  old,  by  the  ancient  practice  of  the  English,  and  ourselves  in  Scotland, 
none  but  princes  and  dukes  used  to  wear  it  on  their  heads  or  helmets,  or  timbred 
their  achievements  therewith  as  an  ensign  of  royalty  or  dignity.  iMr  Sandford 
tells  us  in  his  Genealogical  History  of  the  Kings  of  England,  "  That  King  Ed- 
"  WARD  the  III.  and  his  successors  Kings  of  England,  down  to  King  Edward  the 
"  VI.  had  on  their  seals  of  arms  this  cap  of  state.  For  on  the  cuts  of  their  seals 
"  there  is  to  be  seen  on  one  side  the  figure  of  the  several  kings  represented  on 
"  horseback  in  armour,  with  this  cap  of  state  on  their  heads,  and  the  crest  ol' 
"  England  set  thereupon."  Which  helmet,  cap,  and  crest  adorn  also  their  es- 
cutcheons. 

Prince  Edward,  eldest  son  of  King  Edward  the  III.  had  the  same  cap  on  his 
head,  surmounted  with  the  crest  of  England,  and  charged  with  a  label  of  three 
points.  And  Henry  Duke  of  Lancaster,  the  second  of  that  dignity  in  England, 
carried  on  the  helmet  of  his  achievement  such  another  cap,  in  place  of  a  wreath, 
whereupon  was  placed  his  crest,  being  a  lion  passant  gardant. 

The  author  of  the  dictionary  to  Guillim  says,  "  That  the  word  chapeau  is  the 
"  common  French  word  for  a  cap  or  hat ;  but  here  it  is  taken  for  an  ancient  cap 
"  of  dignity  worn  by  dukes,  being  scarlet  coloured  velvet  on  the  outside,  and  lin- 
"  ed  with  a  fur  ;  of  late  frequently  to  be  seen  above  a  helmet  instead  of  a  wreath 
"  under  gentlemen's  crests.  But  formerly  (continues  he)  they  were  rarely  to  be 
"  found  the  rijral  of  private  families  :  They  after  became  frequent,  together  with 
"  ducal  coronets  by  the  grants  of  Robert  Cock,  Esq;  Clarencieux,  and  others  since 
"  him,  but  by  his  in  particular."  Thus  that  author.  But  I  do  not  find  this  ducal 
cap  in  any  other  called  chapeau,  except  in  the  Display,  where  it.  is  more  properly 
also  called  a  cap  of  dignity  ;  and  Columbier  calls  all  sorts  of  such  caps  bonnets :  but 

Vol.  II.  T  t 


56  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

gives  the  name  of  chapeau  to  that  which  we  properly  call  a  hat,  and  not  to  a  cap 
or  bonnet. 

With  us  Sir  James  Balfour,  Lyon  King  at  Arms,  in  his  Manuscript  of  Exterior 
Ornaments,  says,  "  That  he  has  seen  the  seal  of  arms  of  Archibald  Earl  of  Doug- 
"  las,  Duke  of  Touraine,  Great  Constable  of  France,  appended  to  a  charter  grant- 
"  ed  by  him  to  the  progenitor  of  the  Earls  of  Winton  ;"  which  charter  is  supposed 
to  be  in  their  custody  ;  on  which  seal  is  the  said  duke's  achievement,  and  the  hel- 
met ensigned  with  a  cap  of  the  same  form,  as  mentioned  before.  The  present 
Duke  of  Douglas  had  the  same  on  his  achievement  painted  and  illuminated  on  his 
coach,  which  I  saw  anno  1708  ;  but  observed  that,  through  ignorance,  the  painter 
had  drawn  the  points  of  the  cap  forward,  which  ought  properly  to  be  turned  to 
the  back  or  sinister  side  of  the  helmet. 

The  said  Sir  James  informs  us,  "  That  he  had  likewise  seen  the  seal  of  arms  of 
"  John  Stewart  Duke  of  Albany,  Earl  of  March,  Lord  Annandale,  and  the  Isle  of 
"  Man,  Governor  of  Scotland  in  the  minority  of  King  James  the  V.  appended  to 
"  a  treaty  with  King  Henry  the  VIIL  of  England,  upon  which  was  his  achieve- 
"  ment,  and  on  the  helmet  placed  above  the  same,  was  set,  instead  of  the  wreath, 
"  this  cap  of  state." 

And  the  present  Earl  of  Home,  carrying  in  his  armorial  achievement  for  crest, 
a  lion's  head  erased,  with  this  cap  of  state,  gules,  turned  up  ermine.  I  could 
give  several  other  examples  ;  but  these  may  suiEce  to  prove  its  usage  here  in  Scot- 
land. 

But  now  this  chapeau,  or  cap  of  state,  has  lost  its  former  eminent  dignity,  by 
the  bad  practice  of  some  modern  heralds,  who  not  only  give  it  to  all  the  degrees 
of  high  nobility,  wiiich  is  somewhat  tolerable,  but  even  to  the  lesser  nobility,  as 
may  be  seen  in  Richard  Blome's  Treatise  of  Honour,  Military  and  Civil,  subjoined 
to  Mr  Guilllm's  Display  of  Heraldry.  Where  the  achievements  of  knights,  baron- 
ets, and  batchelors  and  esquires  are  represented  engraven  on  copperplate,  having 
their  helmets  and  other  parts  of  their  achievements  ensigned  with  this  cap  of  state, 
which  ought  not  properly  to  be  carried  by  any  below  nobility,  considering  that 
none  but  kings,  dukes,  and  high  nobility  were  allowed,  of  old,  to  carry  the  same 
in  their  armorial  bearings. 

Yet  the  French  have  no  such  chapeau,  as  a  sign  of  dignity  and  eminent  virtue, 
though  they  have  of  another  form,  used  by  their  chancellors,  and  presidents  of 
Pailiament,  as  ensigns  of  their  civil  dignity,  and  with  which  they  always  adorn 
their  arms  ;  of  which  after.  But  first  of  marks  of  ecclesiastic  dignity,  of  which  I 
ihall  treat  in  the  next  chapter. 


CHAP.     X. 

or  ENSIGNS  BELONGING  TO  ECCLESIASTICAL  DIGNITIES. 

A  ND  first,  as  to  the  Pope,  who  is  the  supreme  dignity  in  the  church,  being 
X~  4.  the  head  bishop,  and,  as  it  were,  sole  monarch  in  spirituals  among  Roman 
C^  iiolics,  throughout  the  whole  world.  He  is  chosen  by  the  cardinals,  and  his 
S(.e  has  always  been  at  Rome,  whence  his  orders,  by  the  name  oi  briefs  and  bulls, 
are  dispersed  throughout  the  universe.  The  bulls  are  so  called  from  bulla,  a  great 
leaden  seal  hanging  to  them.  This  may  suffice  concerning  him,  as  being  sufficient- 
ly known  ;  and  yet  the  controversies  about  his  authority  are  endless  ;  and  there- 
fore it  is  needless  to  say  any  more  of  him,  but  only  what  relates  to  the  exterior 
ornaments  that  he  is  in  use  to  carry  in  adorning  his  armorial  bearings. 

The  Popes  of  Rome  have  been  in  use  to  carry  and  adorn  their  paternal  arms,  not 
OP  a  formal  or  ordinary  shield,  but  an  oval  cartouch,  as  it  is  called,  and  the 
Italians,  for  the  most  part,  have  their  shields  of  arms  after  an  oval  form,  in  imita- 
tion, it  is  thought,  of  those  used  by  popes  and  other  eminent  churchmen.  This 
oval  cartouch  the  popes  adorn  with  their  papal  ensigns,  being  the  tiara,  keys,  and 
cross  staffs. 

The  tiara  papalis  is  an  ornament  of  the  head,  being  a  high  cap  of  silk  envi- 
roned with  three  crowns  of  gold,  placed  one  ahove  the  other,  adorned  with  pearls 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  57 

and  precidus  stones.  The  top  of  the  cap  surmounted  with  a  mond  ot  gold,  or 
precious  stone,  ensigned  with  a  cross,  as  that  of  the  emperors ;  having  two  labels 
or  pendents  at  the  sides  of  the  tiar,  hanging  down,  and  again  turned  up;  which 
tiar  or  triple  crown,  called  the  reirne,  is  the  sign  of  sovereign  supremacy,  as 
they  say,  over  the  universal  church,  and  is  placed  above  the  cartouch  of  the  pope's 
arms. 

The  author  of  the  new  Dictionary  of  Heraldry  says,  "  That  the  papal  crown  is 
"  hke  a  deep  cap  or  mitre,  of  cloth  of  gold,  encompassed  with  three  coronets  or 
"  circles  of  gold,  adorned  with  flowers,  and  all  embellished  with  precious  stones, 
"  and  on  the  top  the  globe,  and  on  it  the  cross."  There  are  several  of  these  triplu 
crowns  kept  in  the  Roman  sacristy,  some  say  to  the  number  of  four,  with  as  many 
rich  mitres,  which  serve  only  for  ornament  and  show,  being  too  heavy  to  wear. 
The  richest  of  which  was  made  by  Tope  Julius  the  II.  An  account  of  which  may 
be  seen  in  Motraye's  Travels,  vol.    I.  page  346. 

The  two  keys,  one  of  gold  and  the  other  of  silver,  are  placed  in  saltier  on  the 
banner  of  the  church,  which  is  of  red  silk.  And  they  were  also  placed  behind  the 
cartouch  of  the  pope's  arms  saltier-v.ays,  as  symbols  of  their  power  in  opening  and 
shutting  the  gates  of  heaven  and  hell.  The  pope  carries  also,  by  way  of  supporters, 
two  angels  proper,  who  are  placed  in  a  sitting  posture  one  on  each  side  of  the  car- 
touch,  and  each  with  one  of  their  hands  supporting  and  bearing  up  the  triple 
crown,  and  with  their  other  hands  holding  each  a  long  staff  with  three  traverses 
near  the  top ;  which  traverses  end  in  trefoils,  and  are  of  the  same  metal  with  the 
keys. 

The  cardinals  are  now  become  ,the  first  of  all  the  clergy  of  the  popish  church, 
next  to  the  pope.  That  which  raises  them  above  bishops  and  patriarchs  is  the 
power  they  have  during  the  vacancy  of  the  see  of  Rome  ;  as  having  the  right  to 
choose  a  new  pope,  and  being  themselves  the  persons  on  one  of  whom  that  elec- 
tion falls.  These  high  prerogatives  have  gained  them  the  title  of  princes  of  tlie 
church  ;  and,  as  such,  few  princes  in  Italy  contend  with  them  for  precedence, 
being  reckoned  little  inferior  to  crowned  heads :  For  this  reason  the  popes  have 
thought  fit  that  they  sliould  be  clothed  in  scarlet,  especially  upon  public  occa- 
sions, as  kings  and  emperors  commonly  are,  though  that  colour  was  given  them,  as 
they  say,  to  put  them  in  mind  that  they  are  always  to  be  ready  to  shed  their  blood  for 
the  true  faith.  But  though  they  wear  red  garments  on  ordinary  days,  that  being 
the  colour  of  blood,  yet,  on  days  of  sorrow,  they  pat  on  violet  or  purple,  which  is 
more  dark  and  mournful.  Pope  Innocent  the  IV.  was  the  first  that  gave  them 
the  red  hat.  At  the  council  of  Lyons,  in  the  year  1244,  Boniface  the  VIII. 
granted  leave  to  the  secular  cardinals  to  wear  the  scarlet  robe,  when  the  popes 
began  to  wear  white.  Paul  the  III.  gave  them  the  red  cap ;  and,  lastly,  Gre- 
gory the  XIV.  allowed  the  religious  cardinals  to  wear  it,  but  that  they  should 
still  be  clothed  in  the  colour  of  their  order.  The  creation  of  cardinals  is  wholly 
in  the  pope,  who  only  communicates  the  same  to  other  cardinals,  and  they  give 
their  approbation.  'Ihe  new  created  cardinals  go  the  same  day  to  visit  the  pope, 
who  puts  the  red  cap  on  their  heads,  they  kneeling,  and  the  master  of  the  cere- 
monies puts  on  their  rochet ;  then  having  taken  off  the  cap,  the  new  cardinal 
kisses  the  pope's  foot  and  hand,  and  then  they  rise,  and  the  pope  embraces  them  ; 
after  which,  when  the  pope  gives  them  audience,  they  sit  down  and  are  covered. 
The  red  hat  is  afterwards  given  them  in  a  public  consistory,  on  their  knees,  and 
then  they  go  to  church,  and  Te  Dtimi  is  sung.  The  pope  performs  he  ceremony 
of  shutting  their  mouths  in  a  private  consistory,  and  they  are  opened  again  in  the 
same  manner  a  few  days  after ;  that  done,  he  gives  each  of  them  a  title  of  bishop^ 
priest,  and  deacon,  putting  a  gold  ring  on  their  fourth  finger,  to  signify  their  be- 
ing married  to  the  church.  The  cardinals  that  are  absent  when  chosen  have  the 
cap  sent  them,  and  is  set  on  their  heads  by  the  sovereign  in  whose  dominions  they 
reside.  As  for  the  red  hat,  and  the  other  ceremonies,  they  cannot  be  performed 
anywhere  but  at  Rome  ;  for  the  hat  must  be  given  by  the  pope  himself,  who  al- 
so confers  the  title,  after  the  ceremonies  of  shutting  and  opening  the  mouth. 
Thus  many  cardinals  die  without  ever  receiving  the  red  hat,  because  not  at  Rome. 

The  cardinals'  exterior  armorial  murk  of  dignity  is  the  red  har,  with  wliich  rbey 
timbre  their  shields,  having  red  strappings,  with  fifteen  tassels  hanging;  dowQ  at 


58  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

each  side  of  the  shield.  Pope  Innocent  III.  discharged  them  to  use  coronets  or 
other  badges  of  their  secular  dignities,  but  few  complied  therewith,  save  the  Ita- 
lians, for  those  of  France  continued  to  carry  in  their  achievements  all  their  marks 
of  dignity,  politic,  civil,  and  ecclesiastic.  As  Cardmal  Richlieu,  commonly  design- 
ed the  Cardinal,  Duke,  Peer,  High  Admiral  of  France,  and  Commander  of  the  Royal 
Order  of  the  Holy  Ghost.  For  he  in  his  armorial  bearing  carried  below  his  cardi- 
nal hat  a  ducal  crown  placed  upon  his  escutcheon,  and  round  it  the  Order  of  the 
Holy  Ghost,  and  behind  the  shield  two  anchors  disposed  in  saltier,  for  his  badge, 
as  being  High  Admiral  of  France. 

Albert  Archduke  of  Austria,  son  of  Maximilian  II.  Emperor  of  Germany,  who 
married  Clara  Eugenia,  Infanta  and  daughter  of  Philip  II.  King  of  Spain,  placed 
on  his  escutcheon  an  arched  crown,  and  above  it  a  cardinal's  hat,  with  tifteen 
tassels  hanging  down  at  each  side  of  the  shield,  which  he  carried  as  being  a  cardi- 
nal.    See  his  seal  of  arms  exhibited  by  Olivarus  Uredus. 

Archbishops,  primates,  and  legates,  place  a  cross  staff"  with  two  traverses  at  the 
top,  erected  in  pale  in  the  middle  of  the  back  of  their  shields  of  arms,  and  above 
the  same  a  green  hat  with  ten  tassels  hanging  down  at  each  side  of  the  shield ;  as 
Monsieur  Baron,  in  his  Abrege  Metbodique,  blazons  the  achievement  of  Camille 
QE  Neuville  de  Villeroy,  Archbishop  and  Earl  of  Lyons,  Primate  of  France,  and 
Commander  of  the  Royal  Order  of  France,  viz.  azure,  a  cheveron  between 
three  anchors  of  the  last :  which  shield  of  arms  is  environed  with  the  blue  ribbon, 
and  thereto  affixed  the  pendant  of  the  royal  order,  and  timbred  with  an  earl's  co- 
ronet ;  and  behind  the  shield  is  placed,  in  pale,  a  cross  staff,  with  two  traverses 
near  the  top,  surmounted  of  an  archbishop's  green  hat,  with  its  proper  number  of 
tassels,  being  ten  on  each  side. 

Bishops  place  on  the  dexter  side,  and  on  the  top  of  their  shields  of  arms,  a  mitre 
affronte,  (i.  e.  looking  forward)  and  behind  the  sinister  side  of  the  said  shield  they 
carry  a  crosier,  erected  in  pale,  with  its  hooked  head  appearing  above  the  shield 
as  high  as  the  mitre,  turned  to  the  left,  and  the  foot  of  it  appearing  below  at  the 
bottom  of  the  left  side  thereof;  and  above  all,  a  green  hat  with  six  tassels  hanging 
down  at  each,:side  of  the  shield. 

I  do  not  find  that  our  bishops  in  Britain  have  used  to  carry  hats  and  tassels,  as 
a  part  of  their  armorial  ensigns,  before  the  year  1520,  but  only  mitres  and  crosiers  ; 
for  I  have  seen  several  seals  of  our  ancient  bishops,  in  formal  shields  placed  below 
the  images  of  saints  or  mitred  bishops,  supported  by  angels,  and  adorned  with 
mitres  and  crosiers  only. 

Particularly  I  have  seen  the  seal  of  William  Fraser  Archbishop  of  St  An- 
drews, who  flourished  in  the  reign  of  King  Robert  the  Bruce,  where  the  shield  of 
his  arms  is  only  timbred  with  a  mitre  below  the  feet  of  St  Andrew. 

And  on  the  seal  of  John  Cameron,  Bishop  of  Glasgow  and  Chancellor  of  Scot- 
land, appended  to  an  indenture  between  Jean,  widow  of  King  James  I.  and  Sir 
Alexander  Livingston  of  Callender,  concerning  Sir  Alexander's  keeping  of  the 
young  king's  person,  dated  4th  September  1439,  where  his  arms  are  only  timbred 
with  a  mitre,  and  at  the  sides  of  the  shield  are  two  salmons  erected  with  rings 
in  their  mouths;  and  the  legend  round  the  seal  is,  Sigillum  Joannis  Episcopi 
Glasguen.  The  same  arms  are  cut  in  stone,  with  a  salmon  below  the  shield, 
as  they  are  to  be  seen  on  the  vestry  of  the  church  of  Glasgow,  which  that  bishop 
built. 

The  modern  method  that  our  British  bishops  use  in  adorning  the  shields  of  their 
arms,  is.  That  our  archbishops  only  place  a  mitre  affronte  on  the  top  of  their 
shields,  with  two  labels  or  pendants  fixed  thereto,  hanging  down,  waved  and 
folded  on  each  side  of  the  shield ;  and  behind  the  same,  two  crosiers  disposed  in 
saltier,  with  their  hooked  heads  appearing  above,  and  the  points  of  the  same  com- 
ing out  below  the  bottom  of  the  escutcheon.  And,  in  most  of  paintings  and  he- 
raldry books,  bishops  only  adorn  their  shields  of  arms  with  a  mitre  placed  on  the 
top  thereof,  with  pendants  hanging  down  as  aforesaid,  without  making  use  of  any 
other  exterior  ornaments. 

Abbots  of  the  popish  church  timbre  their  arms  with  a  mitre  in  profile,  or  stand- 
in,;::  sideways,  on  the  dexter  side  of  the  top  of  their  shields,  and  a  crosier  erected  in 
pale,  placed  at  the  back  of  the  sinister  side  thereof,  with  its  hooked  head  appear- 
2 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  S9 

iiig  above  the  shield,  raised  as  high  as  the  mitre,  and  turned  to  the  right,  and  above 
both  is  a  black  hat,  from  which  issueth  a  knotted  cord,  with  six  tassels  hanging- 
down  on  each  side  of  the  shield. 

But  on  the  beautiful  abbey  of  Paisley  are  to  be  seen  the  arms  of  Gkorge  Shaw, 
(a  brother  of  the  family  of  Sauchie)  Abbot  of  the  said  abbey,  wiio  adorns  only  the 
shield  of  his  arms  with  a  crosier,  erected  in  pale,  at  the  back  of  the  middle  there- 
of, with  its  hooked  head  appearing  above  the  same. 

As  also  on  the  abbey  of  Holyroodhouse  is  to  be  seen,  cut  on  stone,  the  arms  of 
Abbot  Archibald  Crawfurd,  a  brother  of  the  house  of  Haining,  and  Treasurer  to 
King  James  111.  where  his  shield  of  arms  is  only  adorned  with  a  mitre  placed  on 
the  top  thereof.  But  I  never  could  find  that  any  of  our  abbots  of  old  made  use  of 
the  black  hat  and  tassels,  as  an  addition  of  exterior  ornaments  to  adorn  their  armo- 
rial bearings. 

On  the  seal  of  Andrew,  Commendator  of  Jedburgh,  I  saw  his  arms  cur, 
.  adorned  only  with  a  crosier  erected  in  pale,  placed  at  the  back  of  the  middle 
of  the  shield,  and  the  hooked  head  thereof  appearing  above  the  same,  turned  to 
the  right. 

Abbesses  carry  their  arms  in  a  lozenge  shield,  and  adorn  the  same  with  a 
crosier  erected  in  pale,  at  the  back  of  the  middle  thereof,  with  its  head  above 
the  lozenge,  turned  to  the  right,  and  the  shield  is  ordinarily  either  environed 
with  a  chaplet  of  flowers,  two  palm  branches,  or  a  crown  of  thorns  tied  to  the  foot 
of  the  crosier,  that  appears  below  the  base  point  of  the  lozenge. 

Prothonotaries  of  the  church  of  Rome  timbre  their  shields  of  arms  with  a  black 
hat,  having  three  tassels  hanging  down  at  each  side  thereof. 

Priors  and  Provosts  of  the  said  church  carry,  behind  the  middle  of  their  shields, 
erect  in  pale,  a  pastoral  staff,  like  to  that  of  a  pilgrim's  bourdon.  And  the  shield 
is  also  adorned  with  two  palm  branches  tied  to  the  foot  of  the  said  staff,  appear- 
ing below  the  shield,  and  raised  on  each  side  thereof  as  high  as  the  top  of  the 
staff. 

Deans  of  that  church  carry  a  crosier  erect  in  pale  behind  the  middle  of  their 
shields,  with  its  hooked  head  appearing  at  the  top  thereof,  turned  to  the  left, 
adorned  with  two  palm  branches,  disposed  after  the  same  method  as  carried  by  the 
pnors  above. 

Chanters  of  the  same  church  carry  the  staff  or  mace  of  the  chapter,  erected  in 
pale  at  the  middle  of  the  back  of  the  shield,  with  the  head  thereof  appearing  at 
the  top.  Also  tiiey  adorn  the  shields  of  their  arms  with  two  palm  branches  dis- 
posed after  the  same  method  as  the  last. 

And  other  inferior  ecclesiastics  of  the  church  of  Rome  abroad  trim  and  adorn 
their  shields  of  arms  with  cherubims,  who  are  said  to  be  the  second  of  the  nine 
orders  of  angels. 

As  for  the  ancient  use  of  these  ecclesiastic  marks  in  armories,  Menestrier  tells 
us,  "  That  the  cardinal's  hat,  the  crosier,  and  cross  staff,  have  been  in  armories 
"  above  three  hundred  years;  and  which  figures  have  made  up  the  arms  of 
"  many  churchmen.  " 

The  custom  of  timbring  archbishops'  and  bishops'  arms  with  the  hat  was 
first  practised  in  Spain,  as  some  will,  and  the  arms  of  Don  Roderico  Fernando, 
Bishop  of  Jaen,  was  so  trimmed  in  the  year  1400,  which  are  still  to  be  Seen  at 
Basa. 

In  Alimond's  History  of  the  Council  of  Constance,  printed  at  Augsburg  in 
the  year  1483,  are  the  arms  of  four  patriarchs,  viz.  of  Antioch,  of  Constantinople, 
of  Venice,  and  of  Jerusalem,  timbred  with  green  hats. 

The  hat  upon  arms  of  bishops  is  not  ancient  in  France,  says  Menestrier ;  and 
the  use  of  it  was  only  brought  in  there  by  Tristan  de  Saladzes,  Archbishop  of 
Sens,  a  Spaniard,  about  the  year  1520.  But  1  find  in  England,  out  of  Sandford's 
Genealogical  History,  that  Henry  Beaufort,  (second  son  of  John  Duke  of  Lan- 
caster, by  his  wife  Catharine  Swinford)  who  was  a  cardinal,  had  his  arms  timbred 
with  a  hat.  And  with  us  in  Scotland  our  ancient  bishops  carried  mitres  and  cro- 
siers only  ;  but  in  all  my  readings  1  have  not  met  with  any  of  them  to  have  car- 
ried hats  before  the  year  1520, 

Vol.  U.  U  u 


00  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

The  mitre  is  made  forked,  to  intimate  that  those  who  have  right  to  carry  it, 
ought  to  be  known  boch  in  the  Old  and  New  Testament.  And  though  very  ancient, 
yet  it  is  not  universally  to  be  met  with  on  escutcheons  of  arms ;  because  upon 
sepulchral  monuments,  where  they  are  most  ordinarily  to  be  found,  we  meet  fre- 
quently with  the  representation  of  the  person  interred  cut  on  stone,  upon  whose 
head  is  set  the  mitre,  and  not  upon  his  shield  of  arms,  just  as  we  find  crowns  on 
the  seals  of  kings,  &.c.  first  on  the  bearers'  heads,  before  they  were  placed  on  their 
shields  of  arms. 

As  for  the  antiquity  of  prothonotaries,  placing  on  their  arms  a  black  hat  doubled 
with  green,  Charles  de  Grasaria,  in  his  Treatise  of  such  Ornaments,  printed  in  the 
year  i545,  says,  "  Protonotarius  timbrum  addit  ex  pilio  iiigro  duplicate  viridi  co- 
lore. "  And  about  this  time  chanters  began  to  place  the  staff  or  mace  of  the  chap- 
ter behind  their  shields  of  arms. 

It  has  also  been  the  custom  of  the  commanders  of  the  religious  orders  to  place 
the  badges  of  these  orders  in  their  arms,  by  way  of  composition.  But  as  to  the 
antiquity  of  churchmen  impaling  and  quartering  their  arms  with  those  of  their 
sees, -the  same  is  to  be  found  in  the  year  1329,  and  sooner. 

It  is  to  be  observed,  that  all  the  above  churchmen  who  use  and  carry  the  exte- 
rior ornament  of  a  hat  above  their  arms,  have  also  a  cordeliere,  (issuing  out  of  the 
same)  which  is  a  cord  with  two  running  knots  on  each  side,  whereat  hang  down 
the  foresaid  tassels  on  both  sides  of  the  shield,  and  are  always  advanced  in  number 
according  to  the  person's  degree  in  ecclesiastical  preferments,  from  a  protonotary 
to  a  cardinal. 

Sir  George  Mackenzie  tells  us  in  his  Precedency,  pages  29  and  30,  That  the 
Roman  patriarch  was  by  Phocas  the  Emperor  raised  above  all  the  rest  in  the  year 
606,  since  which  time  they  have  raised  themselves  by  several  degrees  to  the  pa- 
pacy ;  though  it  cannot  be  denied  but,  even  before  that  time,  the  bishop  of  Rome 
had  the  first  seat  in  all  councils,  as  is  clear  by  Justinian's  Novella,  131.  cap.  2. 
But  the  power  of  presiding  did  still  belong  to  the  emperors,  as  has  been  fully 
cleared  by  Cursius  and  others.  And  though  it  be  pretended  that  Constantine  the 
Great  did,  from  Christian  humility,  prefer  the  successor  of  St  Peter  (as  vicar  of 
Jesus  Christ)  to  himself,  yet  the  Emperor  Frederick  I.  did  conscientiously  debate 
this  precedency  V\'ith  Pope  Adrian  IV.  since  which  time  it  has  been  variously  ac- 
quiesced in  by  popes  and  emperors.  And  though  the  legates  be  representatives 
of  the  popes,  yet  Thuanus  tells  us,  lib.  98.  that  the  learned  Brissonius,  President  of 
the  Parliament  of  Paris,  would  not  suffer  the  pope's  legate  to  precede  him  ;  and  at 
the  coronation  of  the  Emperor  Charles  V.  the  pope's  legate  was  denied  the  prece- 
dency from  the  electors. 

The  cardinals  have  debated  for  precedency  with  patriarchs ;  though  by  the 
Novella  132.  cap.  1.  Justinian  places  patriarchs  next  to  the  pope;  and  Pauormit, 
in  Cap.  Antiqua.  X.  de  PrivUeg.  13  Excess.  Prcelat.  prefers  the  patriarchs  to  the 
cardinals.  But  now,  by  the  concession  of  Sixtus  Quintus,  that  pope  has  raised 
the  cardinals  to  an  equal  degree  with  kings  ;  and  if  kings  be  present  at  table  or 
other  solemnities  with  cardinals,  if  there  be  but  one  king,  he  is  to  sit  after  the  first 
cardinal  bishop;  and  if  there  be  more  kings,  they  sit  mixtly  with  the  cardinals; 
first  a  cardinal  and  then  a  king.  But  though  this  holds  amongst  popish  princes, 
yet  the  author  of  Les  Memoires  des  Ambassadeurs  does  observes,  That  Leicester, 
Trotius,  and  the  other  ambassadors  of  protestant  princes,  never  yielded  precedency 
to  cardinals,  till  our  countryman  Sir  William  Lockhart,  Ambassador  for  Oliver 
Cromwell  to  the  Court  of  France  in  the  year  1657,  yielded  it  to  Cardinal  Mazarine; 
where  he  likewise  observes,  that  the  Prince  of  Conde  yielded  the  precedency  to 
Cardinal  Richlieu,  yet  the  Count  of  Soissons  refused  it. 

I  find  by  a  letter  in  the  year  1625,  that  before  King  James  went  to  England, 
the  marquisses  of  Scotland  took  place  of  the  archbishops  ;  but  now  the  archbishops 
take  place  of  all  dukes  and  marquisses,  in  imitation  of  England.  And  by  a  letter 
in  the  year  1626,  renewed  in  the  year  1664,  the  Archbishop  of  St  Andrews  is  to 
take  place  of  all  subjects,  which  is  to  be  so  limited  as  not  to  exclude  the  king's  chil- 
dren and  brothers,  as  I  conceive ;  and  de  facto  the  Archbishop  of  St  Andrews  gives 
place  to  the  Chancellor,  ever  since  the  letter. 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


CHAP.    XI. 

ENSIGNS  OF  CIVIL  AND  MILITARY  OFFICES,  AND  OTHER  I'OLITIC  ONES  OF  DIGNITY  AND 
CHIVALRY. 

IN  treating  of  tliese,  I  shall  take  occasion  to  mention  all  such  dignitied  persons 
as  I  have  met  with,  who  adorn  the  shield  ot"  then-  arms  with  exterior  ensigns 
and  figures  suitable  to  the  offices  and  dignities  they  have  been  honoured  v\  ith  by 
the  sovereign;  with  the  manner  ot"  usage  and  situation  of  such  badges  of  honour 
in  and  about  the  shield,  as  their  symbola  ailministrationis. 

And,  first,  as  to  the  armorial  ensigns  of  civil  offices  of  dignity,  I  shall  begin  witli 
the  Lord  High  Chancellor,  or  Keeper  of  the  Great  Seal,  who  is  looked  upon  (says 
Mr  Miege,  in  his  State  of  South  Britain)  as  the  prime  minister  of  state,  and  the 
highest  person  in  the  kingdom  in  civil  affairs,  after  the  king  and  princes  of  the 
blood,  as  the  Archbishop  of  Canterbury  is  in  England,  and  that  of  St  Andrews  in 
Scotland,  in  ecclesiastical  affairs.  His  place  is  of  great  trust:  He  keeps  a  court, 
called  tiie  Court  of  Chancery,  wherein  he  is  sole  judge.  It  is  he  that  now  keeps 
tlie  Great  Seal  of  Britain,  without  which  and  the  mace  he  never  appears  abroad. 
All  patents,  commissions,  and  warrants,  coming  from  the  king,  are  perused  by  him. 
If  they  be  lawful  he  signs  them,  and  if  not,  he  cancels  them.  By  virtue  of  his 
office  lie  is  one  of  the  King's  Privy  Council,  and  ought  to  have  a  tender  regard  for 
the  rights  of  the  crown.  He  also  bestows  all  benefices  in  the  king's  gift  under 
twenty  pound  yearly,  in  the  king's  books.  His  office  is  durante  beiieplacitu.  The 
Lord  Chancellor  and  Lord  Keeper  is  the  same  in  authority,  power  and  precedency 
in  England.  All  the  difference  is,  that  the  Lord  Chancellor  is  created  by  patent, 
■which  the  Lord  Keeper  is  not;  and  that  the  title  of  chancellor  is  a  particular  mark 
of  the  king's  favour. 

The  Lord  Chancellor,  with  us,  (says  Sir  George  Mackenzie,  in  his  Precedency, 
page  39.)  is  in  effect  the  first  officer  in  the  nation,  and  is  by  his  office,  and  by  a 
particular  statute,  president  in  all  courts.  Act.  I.  Pari.  i.  Charles  II.;  which  act 
was  made  to  declare  that  he  was  president  of  the  exchequer,  as  well  as  of  other 
courts,  this  having  been  pretended  to  by  the  treasurer.  He  hath  his  title  not 
from  the  power  of  cancelling,  as  the  old  Gloss  says,  that  "  Cancellarius  est  qui 
"  habet  officium  scripta  responsaque  principis  inspicere,  &  male  scripta  cancellare;" 
for  it  is  not  imaginable  that  he  would  take  his  title  from  what  he  destroys,  and 
not  from  what  he  does;  but  from  the  canct-lli  et  banes,  within  which  the  judges 
did  sit  inclosed,  as  is  clear  from  Cassiodor.  lib.  ii.  epist.  1.  These  canceUani  of 
old  were  in  effect  the  clerks;  and  the  chancellor  is  so  called  now  because  he  signs 
all  the  public  papers,  and  appends  his  seal.  "  Ideo  quod  ad  eum  universcE  publicae- 
"  referentur  conscriptiones,  ipseque  eos  annulo  regis  sive  sigillo  firmaret."  Simaq. 
lib.  I.  calls  him,  "  Questor  legum,  conditor  regalis,  consilii  particeps,  justitiae  ar- 
"  biter:"  Which  names  I  conceive  are  given  to  him,  because  Novel,  114.  "  Di- 
"  vinas  jussiones  debent  habere  subscriptionem  glorissimi  questoris;"  and  many  of 
the  Novels  are  signed  questor  lejuin.  The  Lord  Chancellor  of  Scotland  doth  not 
receive  his  authority  as  the  Chancellor  of  England  doth,  who  hath  no  other  com- 
mission but  merely  by  the  delivery  of  the  Great  Seal  of  England,  as  the  learned 
Coke  observes:  But  with  us  the  chancellor's  place  is  always  conferred  by  com  • 
mission  under  the  Great  Seal,  and  very  often  during  life;  as  also  the  Chancellor 
and  Lord  Keeper  in  England  have  the  like  jurisdiction.  But  we  had  a  Lord 
Chancellor  and  a  Lord  Keeper  of  the  Great  Seal,  who  were  distinct  persons,  as  I 
could  prove  by  a  number  of  instances  too  prolix  here  to  insert. 

By  the  laws  of  King  Malcolm  11.  I  find  ten  pounds  is  ordained  to  be  paid  to  the- 
King's  Chancellor,  for  his  fee  of  the  seal  appended  to  the  charter  of  every  hundred 
po".nd  land.  Where,  observe,  that  every  hundred  pound  land  is  set  down  for  the  least 
p-Dortion  and  measure  of  a  barony,  or  holding  of  the  king.  Now  we  know  that 
ai)  hundred  pound  land,  at  least,  will  be  thirty  or  forty,  and  some  50,000  merks  ia 
g-'  d  rent;  so  that  the  barons  of  old  were  powerful,  and  had  under  them  milites, 
and  these  had  subvasores.  Also  in  the  laws  of  King  Malcolm  Canmore,  the  chan- 
cellor is  placed  before  ail  the  officers,  and  sometimes  many  of  the  considerable  earls 


6;    '  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

are  placed  betwixt  him  and  the  vest  of  the  officers.  Thus  King  Alexander  grants 
a  charter,  tesiibus  Willu'lmo  de  Bosco  Cancelturio  meo,  Mulcdmo  Cumite  de  Fife, 
AJano  Senescallte  Scotia;,  &.C.  But  it  is  observable,  that  the  officers  of  state  of  old 
were  in  ancient  writs  oftimes  ranked  according  to  the  quahty  of  the  bearers,  and 
not  according  to  the  precedency  of  the  offices. 

The  Lord  Chancellor  of  England  (says  Sylvanus  Morgan,  in  his  Sphere  of 
Gentry,  lib.  4.  cap.  6.)  carries,  as  the  badge  of  his  office,  in  pale,  behind  the  shield 
of  his  arms,  a  mace,  being  no  other  than  a  staff,  ensigned  with  a  crown.  But  his 
chief  symbol  (says  he)  is  the  purse  which  he  places  below  his  shield,  and  is  open, 
with  the  strings  pendent,  fretted,  nuved,  buttoned,  and  tasselled  gules,  in  a  tield 
ardent,  embroidered  all  over  with  the  sovereign  ensigns  of  his  majesty,  denoting 
the  high  magistracy  of  his  office,  being  to  confirm  the  gifts  and  grants  of  dignities, 
offices,  franchises,  privileges,  and  immunities:  "  Et  in  Francia  duo  sunt  officia, 
"  omnibus  aliis  excellentiora  &  principaliora,  quorum  unum  est  primum  &-  prius 
"  in  justitia,  aliud  autem  jure  militari,"  &-c.  The  Lord  Chancellor  taking  place 
first  for  justice  sake. 

This  high  officer,  with  us,  has  been  in  use  to  place  behind  his  escutcheon  of 
arms,  as  the  badge  of  his  office,  two  maces  disposed  in  saltier,  ensigned  with  imperial 
crowns,  and,  below  his  achievement,  the  said  open  purse,  embroidered  with  the 
royal  arms  of  the  kingdom. 

The  Chancellors  in  France,  besides  the  two  maces  placed  in  saltier  behind  their 
shield  of  arms,  carry  also,  as  a  particular  badge  of  their  office,  a  proper  cap  of 
gold,  (/7«  niortier  d'or^  turned  up  ermine,  which  is  placed  on  their  helmet,  out  of 
which  issues  the  crest  of  their  office,  being  the  figure  of  a  queen  representing 
France,  holding  in  her  right  hand  a  sceptre,  and  in  her  left  the  Great  Seal  of  the 
kingdom;  and  their  achievements  are  ordinarily  placed  on  a  mantle  of  scarlet, 
adorned  with  rays  of  gold  towards  the  top,  and  doubled  with  ermine,  as  Monsieur 
Baron  tells  us  in  his  Art  of  Heraldry.  But  the  chancellors  there  have  not  the 
usage  of  the  purse,  as  with  us  in  Britain.  And  Daniel  Fewel  says.  That  Chan- 
cellor Segnies  was  the  first  who  had  his  arms  so  trimmed  by  the  persuasion  of  the 
learned  herald,  Mark  de  Voulosen  de  la  Columbier. 

The  Presidents  of  the  Parliaments  in  France  place  their  proper  ra/),  being  of  black 
velvet,  edged  with  gold  galoun,  above  their  coronets  and  helmets,  when  of  temporal 
dignity,  and  of  spiritual  below  their  hats  and  mitres.  And  their  achievements  lie 
upon  a  scarlet  mantle  doubled  with  petit  gris,  i.  e.  a  grey  furr  made  of  squirrels' 
tails,  as  set  down  by  the  fore-cifed  Monsieur  Baron. 

The  Great  Chamberlain  in  France  is  called  Grand  Chambrier,  and  was  con- 
stantly possessed  by  the  family  of  Bourbon. 

The  Lord  Great  Chamberlain  of  Engl.\nd,  (according  to  Mr  Miege,  in  his 
State  of  South  Britain)  is  an  officer  of  great  antiquity,  and  of  special  service  at  the 
coronation  of  our  kings.  Upon  which  day,  before  the  king  rises,  he  is  to  bring 
his  shirt,  coif,  and  wearing  clothes;  he  dresses  the  king,  puts  on  his  royal  robes, 
and  serves  his  majesty  that  day  before  and  after  dinner  with  water  to  wash  his 
hands.  In  the  procession  he  marches  with  his  coronet  and  a  white  staff  in  his 
hand.  He  disposes  of  the  sword  of  state  to  what  lord  he  pleases,  to  be  carried  be- 
fore the  king  when  he  comes  to  the  Parliament ;  at  which  time  he  goes  himself  on 
the  right  hand  of  the  sword,  next  to  the  king's  person,  and  the  Earl  Marshal  on 
the  left.  The  whole  palace  of  Westminster  being  under  his  government,  he  issues 
out  his  warrants  for  the  fitting  and  furnishing  of  Westminster-Hall  against  corona- 
tions, and  trials  of  peers  in  Parliament  time.  He  provides  all  things  in  the  House 
of  Lords  in  the  time  of  Parliament,  and  to  that  end  he  has  an  apartment  near  that 
liouse,  with  the  Gentleman-Usher  of  the  Black  Rod,  the  Yeoman-Usher,  and  door- 
keepers under  his  command.  Upon  all  solemn  occasions  the  keys  of  Westminster- 
Hall,  of  the  Courts  of  Wards,  and  Requests,  are  delivered  to  him.  At  the  coro- 
nation he  has  forty  ells  of  crimson  velvet  allowed  him  for  his  own  robes.  After 
the  king  is  dressed  by  him,  and  gone  forth,  his  majesty's  night  apparel,  his  bed, 
and  the  furniture  of  his  chamber,  are  his  fees.  The  very  bason  the  king  washed  his 
hands  in,  and  the  towels  he  has  wiped  them  with,  fall  likewise  to  his  share.  There 
are  also  certain  fees  due  to  him  from  all  peers  of  the  realm  at  their  creation,  or 
when  they  do  their  homage ;  and  from  all  bishops,  when  they  do  their  homage  to 
2 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  6^ 

the  king.  This  office  is  hereditary  in  the  family  of  the  IVIarquis  of  Lindsay  in 
England. 

The  Great  Chmiberl.un  of  Scotland,  (says  Sir  George  Mackenzie,  in  his  Pre- 
cedency, page  40.)  or  Camerariiis  Doinitu  Regis,  is  the  third  great  officer  named  in 
the  statutes  of  K-iiig  Malcolm  Canmore.  And  i  find  him  \n  old  writs  placed  as 
witness,  before  all  the  other  officers,  next  to  the  chancellor.  There  was  ALig/ius 
Cjmerarius,  who  was  chief  judge  over  all  the  burghs:  And  there  were  others  un- 
der-chamberlains,  who  are  oftentimes  designed  Camerarii,  without  the  adjection  of 
Magnus:  And  I  find  in  a  charter  granted  by  King  David,  in  the  year  1495,  the 
witnesses  are  Alexandro--  domino  Huyine  m.igno  camcrmio  nostra,  yohanne  domino 
Diamond  justicinrio  nostra,  Ricardo  Miirehead  secretario  nostra,  et  l/Valtero  Driimand 
nostrorum  rotulorum  et  registri  uc  a  consiliis.  This  otlice  is  the  same  with  Praepositus 
sacri  cubiruli,  mentioned  by  Justinian.  By  the  fourth  chapter  oi  Regiam  Majesta- 
tem,  we  see  the  chamberlain's  office  hath  been  very  great:  For  we  find  that  his 
fees  have  amounted  to  no  less  than  two  hundred  pounds  per  annum,  which  he  had 
paid  out  of  the  profits  of  the  escheats,  fines,  tolls,  and  customs  accruing  to  the  king 
out  of  the  burgiis  over  wliom  the  Great  Chamberlain  exercised  a  particular  juris- 
diction. The  process  and  matters  of  inquiry  that  came  before  him  is  distinctly 
treated  of  by  Sir  John  Skene,  to  whom  I  refer  my  reader. 

The  Lord  High  Chamberlain  in  England,  as  the  symbol  of  his  office,  carries 
two  keys  in  saltier  at  the  back  of  the  escutcheon  of  his  arms,  as  says  Sylvanus 
Morgan,  in  his  Sphere  of  Gentry,  lib.  4.  page  82.  who  also  tells  us,  ibid.  '■  That 
"  the  Lord  Chamberlain  of  the  King's  Household,  as  a  badge  of  that  office,  car- 
"  ries  one  key  in  pale  behind  the  middle  of  the  shield  of  his  arms,  the  same  ap- 
"  pearing  above  his  shield  and  coronet,  and  the  bowl  is  seen  below  the  same." 

The  Lord  High  Chamberlain,  with  us,  is  now  hereditary  in  the  family  of  the 
Duke  of  Lennox,  whose  achievement  I  have  seen  adorned  with  two  keys  of  gold 
disposed  in  saltier  behind  the  shield  of  his  arms,  having  the  bowls  of  the  keys 
downwards,  and  ensigned  with  imperial  crowns  as  the  badge  of  his  office,  after  the 
same  form  as  those  dignified  with  that  high  office  in  France;  the  figure  and  blazon 
whereof  is  to  be  seen  in  Monsieur  Baron's  Art  of  Heraldry.  As  also  in  an  old  paint- 
ing of  the  arms  of  the  family  of  Lennox,  1  have  observed  their  crests  to  have  a 
golden  key  hanging  thereat. 

The  Lord  Chief  Justice  of  England  (says  Mr  Miege  in  his  State  of  Britain)  is 
so  named,  because  his  jurisdiction  extends  over  all  England,  and  a  warrant  from 
him  may  fetch  one  from  any  part  of  it.  He  is  also  called  Lord  Chief  Justice  of  the 
Kind's  Bench,  because  anciently  the  king  sat  there  sometimes  in  person  on  a  high 
bench,  and  the  judges  on  a  low  bench  at  his  feet.  This  is  the  highest  court  in 
England  at  common  law,  next  to  the  House  of  Lords  in  Parliament.  Here  the 
pleas  are  between  the  king  and  the  subject;  all  treasons,  felonies,  breach  of  peace, 
oppression,  and  misgovernment,  being  commonly  brought  before  this  court ;  as  are 
also  all  errors  of  the  judges  and  justices  of  England  in  their  judgments  and  pro- 
ceedings, not  only  in  pleas  of  the  crown,  but  in  all  other  pleas,  the  Exchequer  ex- 
cepted. In  this  court,  all  young  lawyers  that  have  been  called  to  the  bar  are 
allowed  to  plead  and  practise.  There  are  four  judges  belonging  to  this  court,  who 
hold  their  office  by  writ,  not  by  patent.  But  none  may  be  judge  in  this  court  ex- 
cept a  sergeant  at  law,  who  (upon  taking  his  degree)  is  obliged  to  wear  always  a 
lawn  coif  under  his  cap  at  the  bar.  And  the  first  of  these  judges  is  called  Lord 
Chief  Justice. 

The  Lord  Justice  General,  or  Great  Justiciar  with  us,  (according  to  Sir 
George  Mackenzie,  in  his  Precedency,  page  39.)  is  in  the  laws  of  King  Malcolm 
Canmore  placed  nest  the  chancellor,  though  afterwards  Scotland  was  divided  into 
two  justiciaries  one  upon  the  south  side  of  Forth  who  was  called  Justtciarius  Lo- 
thania,  and  in  old  charters  Judex  Laudonia;  and  the  other  on  the  north  side  of 
Forth.  This  place  has  been  generally  possessed  by  noblemen,  and  is  now  the  same 
with  us  that  the  Chief  Justice  of  the  King's  Bench  is  in  England.  His  jurisdiction 
extends  over  all  Scotland,  and  a  warrant  from  him  may  fetch  one  from  any  part 
thereof.  He  keeps  his  court  commonly  at  Edinburgh,  called  the  Justiciary  Court. 
There  are  five  commissioners,  called  Lords  of  Justiciary,  besides  the  Lord  Justice 
General,  and  Lord  Justice  Clerk,  that  are  judges  in  this  court,  where  are  tried  all 

Vol.  IL  Xx 


64  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

crimes  tlsat  reach  to  life  and  limb  (as  we  express  it)  of  the  criminals,  be  they  peera- 
or  com'moiiers;  aad  the  matter  is  submitted  to  the  cogniiance  of  a  jury,  which  is 
not  allowed  in  civil  courts  in  cases  oi  meum  and  tuum,  excepting  the  High  Court  of 
Exchequer,  of  which  afterwards.  The  jury  consists  of  fifteen  persons,  and  the 
foreman  is  called  the  cbLiiicellor  of  the  assize,  or  jury.  In  case  of  the  trial  of  a 
pf:!;r,  the  greatest  part  of  tlie  jury  were  to  be  peers;  but  they  are  now,  since  the 
Union,  to  be  tried  as  peers  ot  Great  Britain.  The  votes  are  collected  by  the  chan- 
cellor, or  foreman,  and  the  major  part  determines  the  matter.  This  court  siti 
everv  tridav  in  the  afternoon,  during  the  time  of  the  Session,  or  term.  All  cri- 
minals those  accused  of  treason  not  excepted,  are  allowed  the  benefit  of  advocates 
or  counsel  to  plead  for  them  in  this  court. 

I  have  met  with  no  author  that  mentions  any  figures  or  symbols  made  use  of  by 
the  Lord  Chief  Justice  of  England,  in  his  armorial  bearing,  as  a  badge  of  his  office. 
But  our  Justice  General  in  Scotland,  once  hereditary  in  the  family  of  Argyle,  who 
is  also  heritably  Great  Master-Household  to  his  Majesty  in  Scotland,  carries  for  the 
badges  of  these  high  oliices,  (as  matriculate  in  the  Lord  Lyon's  Register  of  Arms 
in  Scotland)  saltier-ways,  a  batton  and  a  sword  suppressed  of  the  shield,  the  first 
powdered  with  thistles,  proper,  and  ensigned  on  the  top  with  the  imperial  crown 
and  crest  of  liis  majesty  set  thereon;  which  symbol  he  bears  as  his  particular 
badge  of  Master-Household.  The  sword  is  proper,  hilted  and  pommelled  oi\  with 
the  point  appearing  above,  and  the  pommel  below  the  shield;  which  figure  he  car- 
ries as  being  Heritable  Justice  General  of  the  sheriffdom  of  Argyle,  the  isles  and 
others.  But  when  our  "justice  General  had  no  other  high  office  beside  the  same, 
he  carried  as  the  ensigns  of  this  office  two  naked  swords  disposed  in  saltier  behind 
the  escutcheon  of  arms,  the  points  appearing  above,  and  the  pommels  below  tlie- 
same.  And  this  jurisdiction  was  amongst  others  possessed  at  Rome  by  the  Prafec- 
tus  Pratori,  who  was  their  ch?ef  magistrate. 

The  Lord  High  Tkeasurer  (according  to  the  fore-cited  Mr  Miege,  in  his  State 
of  Britain)  has  under  his  charge  and  government  all  the  king's  revenue,  which  is 
kept  in  the  Exchequer,  and  consequently  the  check  of  all  oflicers  any  ways  employ, 
ed  in  collecting  the  same,  whose  offices  are  also  for  the  most  part  in  his  gift.  This 
office  was  formerly  conferred  by  the  delivery  of  the  golden  keys  of  the  treasury, 
and  now  by  the  delivery  of  a  white  staff,  during  the  king's  pleasure. 

This  offi'cer  of  state,  with  us,  (says  Sir  George  Mackenzie  in  his  Precedency, 
page  42.)  is  not  mentioned  amongst  these  officers  of  the  crown  under  King  Mal- 
cofm  Canmore,  and  of  old  it  has  been  thought  but  an  ofiice  of  the  king's  house: 
For  in  a  confirmation  granted  to  the  abbacy  of  Aberbrothock,  in  the  year  1529, 
by  King  James  V.  after  revereiidissimis  episcopis,  and  clileetis  consanguineis,  are  enu- 
merate as  witnesses  dilectis  famUianbus  nostris  Roberto  Barton  nostra  thcsaurario  et 
computorum  nostronm  rotulatore.  Nor  do  I  find  a  treasurer  designed  as  witness  in 
any  of  the  king's  charters  till  then,  though  some  foolishly  think  that  Panetarius  v/as 
treasurer.  And  though  the  word  familiar  counsellor  be  now  given  to  all  ofiicers  of 
state,  who  are  not  earls-,  because  they  cannot  be  called  cousins;  yet,  of  old,  it  was 
only 'given  to  those  of  the  king's  own  family,  and  was  derived  «  Jamilia,  though 
noxi  fumilinr  is  thought  to  be  the  same  with  intimate.  But  herein  Sir' George  is  in 
a  mistake ;  for  King  James  L  established  the  office  of  High  Treasurer  in  Scotland 
after  his  return  from  captivity  in  England.  And  I  humbly  think,  that  before  this, 
the  Lord  Chamberlain  was  in  effect  treasurer;  for  after  this  the  jurisdiction  of  the 
chan-iberlain  was  restricted  to  what  more  particularly  related  to  the  government  of 
the  burghs,  the  charge  and  management  of  the  king's  property,  and  the  other 
casualties  of  the  crown  being  committed  to  the  care  of  the  treasurer  as  a  distinct 
officer  of  state,  whom  henceforth  we  find  almost  constantly  mentioned  as  a  witness 
in  all  the  royal  charters,  grants,  and  commissions,  that  past  the  Great  Seal,  under 
the  designatiim  of  Thesanrarius  noster. 

The  Court  of  Exchequer  in  Scotland  (says  Mr  Miege  in  his  State  of  North 
Britain)  is  e'^tablished  by  an  act  of  Parliament  of  Great  Britain,  anno  sexto  Anna 
Regime,  entituled,  "  An  Act  for  settling  and  establishing  a  Court  of  Exchequer  in 
"  the  north  part  of  Great  Britain  called  Scotland,"  pursuant  to  a  clause  or  proviso 
for  that  p'H-pose  in  the  19th  article  of  an  act  for  an  Union  of  the  two  kingdoms 
of  Scotland  and  England.     This  court  has  the  same   power,  authority,  privilege, 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  6j 

and  jurisdiction  over  the  revenue  of  Scotland,  as  the  Court  of  Exchequer  in  Eng- 
land has  over  the  revenues  there  ;  and  all  matters  and  things  competent  to  the 
Court  of  Exchequer  ui  England  relating  thereto,  is  likewise  competent  to  the  Ex- 
chequer of  Scotland.  The  judges  are  likewise  invested  with  the  power  of  passing 
signatures,  g;fts,  and  tutories,  and  to  revise  and  compound  them  in  the  same  man- 
ner as  was  done  by  the  Lord  High  Treasurer,  Commissioners  of  the  Treasury,  and 
Court  of  Exchequer  in  Scotland  before  the  Union,  and  to  receive  resignations  in 
his  majesty's  name  in  the  Exchequer  at  the  time  of  the  Union,  and  to  appoint  of- 
ficers, as  was  in  use  to  be  done  before.  A.11  sergeants  at  law,  barristers  at  law,  of 
five  years  standing,  in  any  of  the  four  Inns  of  Court  of  England,  or  such  persons 
as  shall  be  advocates  in  the  College  of  Justice  in  Scotland  for  five  years,  are  quali- 
fied to  be  made  barons  of  this  court.  Their  commissions  are,,  quamditi  se  ben,r 
gesseriiit. 

The  Lord  IliOri  Treasurer  of  England,  according  to  Sylvanus  Morgan  in  his 
Sphere  of  Gentry,  Ub.  4.  page  82.  carried  a  staff  ensigned  on  the  top  with  an  im- 
perial crown,  which  he  places  in  pale  at  the  back  of  the  middle  part  of  his  shield  of 
his  arms,  as  the  pecuhar  badge  or  ensign  of  the  said  office.  And  Sir  George  Mac- 
kenzie, in  his  Science  of  Heraldry,  page  85,  tells  us,  that  the  Lord  High  Treasurer 
of  Scotland  carried  a  white  staff  ensigned  also  on  the  top  with  an  imperial  crown, 
and  placed  in  pale  behind  the  escutcheon  of  his  arms  as  the  symbol  of  his  office. 
And  the  Lord  High  Treasurer  of  Great  Britain  now  makes  use  of  the  same  figure 
as  his  badge  in  adorning  his  armorial  bearing. 

The  Master  of  the  Household,  or  mngis'.er  Icspitii,  is  an  officer  that  surveys  the 
accounts,  and  what  related  chietiy  to  the  offices  of  the  king's  household  or  court, 
and  seems  to  have  come  in  the  place  of  the  Senescallus,  since  we  are  pretty  sure 
%ve  had  no  master  of  the  household  till  after  the  most  serene  family  of  the  Stewarts 
came  to  the  crown,  and  not  just  then  either ;  for  we  have  no  vestige  of  such  an 
officer,  so  far  as  I  have  been  able  to  trace  them,  before  the  Restoration  of  King 
James  1.  anno  1425.  But  whether  this  officer  in  England  is  in  use  to  carry  any 
distinguishing  badge  thereof  in  his  armorial  bearing,  is  what  I  have  not  as  yet  dis- 
covered. But  I  find  that  the  fam.ily  of  the  Earl  of  VVinton,  as  Master-Household 
to  our  kings  of  old,  carried  tv/o  battons  gules,  powdered  with  thistles  of  gold,  and 
ensigned  on  the  top  with  an  imperial  crown,  whereon  is  placed  and  set  the  royal 
crest  of  the  kingdom,  and  disposed  in  saltier  beftind  the  shield  of  their  arms.  And 
the  family  of  Dalmahoy  of  that  Ilk,  as  being  Under  Master-Household  to  King 
James^VI.  and  King  Charles  the  I.  which  oflice  he  got  by  patent  from  the  first, 
and  confirmed  by  the  second,  (which  I  have  seen)  wherein  he  has  the  allowance 
to  place  one  such  batton  erect  in  pale  behind  the  middle  of  the  escutcheon  of  his 
arms.  This  office  of  Great  Master^Household  is  now  hereditary  in  the  family  of 
the  Duke  of  Argyle,  who  being  both  Great  Master-Household  to  the  king,  and 
Justice-General  i.f  the  kingdom,  adorns  his  armorial  ensigns  with  one  of  these  bat- 
tons  for  the  office  of  Master-Household,  as  is  above  narrated. 

The  office  of  Cup-Bearer  to  our  kings  being  of  old  hereditary  in  the  predeces- 
sors of  the  family  of  the  Earls  of  Southesk,  they  carried  a  golden  cup  in  their  arms 
as  the  badge  of  their  olTiGe.  But  this  figure  being  no  exterior  adornment  of  the 
shield,  1  pass  it  over,  now  treating  on  the  Exterior  Ornaments  only. 

We  had  also  of  old  in  Scotland  the  office  of  Panetaiius,  who  commanded  over 
all  the  bakers,  and  Buttelarius,  who  had  the  like  command  over  all  the  keepers  of 
taverns,  £ic.  and  were  inferior  offices  of  the  king's  household  under  the  High 
Stewart  of  Scotland.  And  I  fijid  in  the  letter  directed  from  the  nobility  of  Scotland 
to  Pope  John,  in  the  reign  of  King  Robert  the  Bruce,  dated  at  the  Monastery  of 
Aberbrothock,  the  6th  of  April  1320,  that  the  Lord  Souhs  was  Buttelanus  Scotice. 
And  I  have  seen  a  charter  wherein  John  and  Thomas  Murrays,  sons  to  Sir  An- 
drew Murray,  Governor  of  Scotland,  were  designed  Panetani  Scotia,  upon  the 
forfeiture  of  John  Cuming  Earl  of  Monteith.  in  the  year  134S.  And  which  Earl 
of  Monteith  was  formerly  designed  Panetarius.     .• 

Monsieur  Baroa,  in  his  Art  of  Heraldry,  gives  us  the  arms  of  the  Comte  de 
CossE,  Grand  Paneter  of  France,  who,  as  the  badge  of  that  office,  carries  (says 
he)  below  his  shield,  on  the  dexter  side  thereof,  a  cup,  and  on  the  sinister  a  stan- 
dish  with  pen  and  ink.     But  whether  these  of  that  office  with  us  ever  carried  such 


66  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

symbols  as  the  distinguishing  marks  thereof,  to  adorn  their  shield  of  arms,  I  have 
not  discovered,  though  it  is  very  probable  they  have  borne  the  same,  seeing  in  all 
our  method  of  heraldry  we  commonly  follow  the  usage  of  France. 

The  King's  Forester,  in  Scotland,  (says  Sir  George  Mackenzie,  Science  of 
Heraldry,  page  3.)  carried  hunting-horns  as  the  badge  of  that  office.  Ihus  (con- 
tinues he)  Burnet  carries  a  hunting-horn  in  his  shield,  and  a  Highlander  in  a  liunt- 
ing  garb,  and  greyhounds  for  his  supporters,  to  show  he  was  his  Majesty's  Fo- 
rester in  the  Northern  Forest,  as  Forrester  of  that  Ilk  is  in  the  south  :  For  which 
he  also  carries  three  hunting-horns.  And  the  Grand  Huntsman,  or  Veneur,  in 
France,  carries  (says  Monsieur  Baron)  as  the  badge  of  his  office,  two  hunting-horns 
affronte,  garnished  and  placed  below  the  shield  of  his  arms. 

I  have  seen  the  arms  of  Sir  Alexander  Erskine  of  Cambo,  knight  and  baronet,. 
Lord  Eyon  King  at  Akms,  cut  on  copper,  and  trimmed  thus; — above  the  shield 
(whereon  is  his  own  paternal  coat-armorial  impaled  with  that  of  his  office)  is  set  an 
imperial  crown,  and  behind  the  same  two  battons  seme  of  thistles,  and  St  Andrew's 
crosses  disposed  in  saltier  appearing  at  the  foot,  and  at  the  top  on  each  side  of  the 
crown,  and  round  the  shield  the  collar  of  the  thistle. 

The  Grand  Aumonier,  or  Gre.vi-  Almoner  in  France,  is  thought  to  be  an 
officer  of  the  crown,  and  places  under  his  arms  a  book  marked  with  the  armorial 
shield  of  France  for  the  badge  of  that  office.  And  I  have  seen  on  the  roof  of 
a  hall  in  the  house  of  Seaton  the  arms  of  John  Hamilton,  Archbishop  of  St  An- 
drews, where  is  placed  behind  the  shield  of  nis  arms,  a  cross  staff  erect  in  pale,  and 
below  his  escutcheon  a  book  expanded.  No  doubt  on  the  same  account  as  being 
Great  Almoner  in  Scotland.  The  Almoner  with  us  (says  Sir  George  Mackenzie  in 
his  Precedency,  page  44.)  hath  no  precedency  for  ought  we  know,  yet  is  very  oft 
a  witness  in  all  charters  granted  by  our  kings,  and  some  think  that  clericus  noster 
was  almoner. 

I  come  now,  idly.  To  treat  of  the  ensigns  and  badges  of  such  military  offices 
(as  1  have  met  with)  used  by  those  officers  as  symbols  in  adorning  their  escut- 
cheons. And  shall  begin  with  the  Lord  High  Constable,  of  whom  Mr  Miege, 
in  his  State  of  South  Britain,  says,  "  That  this  officer  in  England,  whose  power 
"  and  jurisdiction  was  anciently  so  exorbitant,  that  it  was  thought  too  great  tor 
"  any  subject.  In  short  (continues  he)  this  office  has  been  discontinued  ever  since 
"  the  reign  of  King  Henry  the  VII.  Edward  Bagot  (or  Stafford),  then  Duke  of 
"  Buckingham,  anno  1521,  having  been  the  last  High  Constable  in  England." 
However,  upon  a  coronation,  a  Lord  High  Constable  is  created /);o  ilia  vice,  who,, 
at  that  ceremony,  marches  in  his  robes  with  his  staff  and  coronet  in  his  hand.  In 
the  Marshal  Court  he  sat  as  judge,  and  took  place  of  the  Earl  Marshal. 

This  high  office  with  us  is  the  same  office  (says  Sir  George  Mackenzie  in  his 
Precedency,  page  41.)  that  the  Comes  Stab uli  was  under  the  Roman  empire,  which 
may  be  confirmed  by  two  clear  testimonies  of  great  antiquity,  one  is  of  Aimon, 
lib.  3.  cap.  7.  "  Landegesihs  regahum  propositus  equorum,  quern  vulgo  Comes 
"  Stabuh  vocant :"  The  other  is  from  Rhegino,  lib.  2.  "  Annalium  Burchardum 
"  Comitem  Stabuli  sui  (quern  corrupte  constabulum  appellabis)  cum  classe  misit  in 
■'  Corsicam  :"  Though  the  learned  Cujacius  does  believe  that  this  title  comes  from 
one  that  commands  a  company  of  men  of  war,  ad  lunic.  de  comit.  ct  tribun.  scalar. 
And  there  are  some  who  derive  it  from  the  word  konhig,  which  signifies  a  king ; 
■And  staple,  which  signifies  ahold,  because  some  constables  were  commanders  of 
the  king's  houses :  Though  I  find  that  the  High  Constable  did  command  the  king's 
armies,  but  was  expressly  debarred  from  commanding  either  his  houses  or  garrisons: 
But  now,  with  us,  the  Constable  and  Marshal  take  not  place  as  officers  of  the 
crown,  but  according  to  their  creation  as  earls,  the  reason  whereof  I  conceive  to 
be,  because,  of  old,  offices  did  not  prefer  those  who  possessed  them,  but  they  took 
place  according  to  their  creation  :  For  the  Constable  and  Marshal,  being  now  the 
only  two  officers  of  the  crown  that  are  heritable  in  Scotland,  continue  to  possess 
as  they  did  formerly.  But  in  France,  England,  and  all  other  places,  the  Constable 
and  Marshal  take  place  as  officers  of  the  crown  ;  and  it  seems  strange  that  these 
who  ride  upon  the  king's  right  and  left  hand,  when  he  returns  from  his  Parlia- 
ments, and  who  guard  the  Parliament  itself  and  the  honours,  should  have  no  pre- 
cedency by  their  offices ;  and  yet  I  cannot  deny,  but  that,  of  old,  other  earls  were 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  67 

placed  before  them  in  ancient  cliaiters,  wherein  Malcolm  Earl  of  Fife  is  named 
before  tliem.  The  Constable  with  us  was,  by  the  laws  ol  K.ing  Malcolm,  cap.  6, 
judge  of  all  crimes  committed  within  twelve  miles  of  tlic  king's  house  or  habita- 
tion;  though  Sir  John  Skene  observes,  that  the  best  manuauipts  bear  only  two 
leagues :  But  now  his  juiisdiction  is  only  e.\ercised  cither  as  to  cnnies  or  breach  of 
the  peace  during  the  time  of  the  Tarharaent,  which  some  extend  bkewise  to  all 
general  conventions. 

Upon  a  commission  and  warrant  granted  by  King  Charles  1.  in  the  year  1631, 
to  several  commissioners  therein  named,  to  search  and  make  trial  anent  tiie 
honouis  and  privileges  belonging  to  the  High  Constable  of  Scotland,  they,  after  a 
diligent  scrutiny,  returned  their  report  to  his  Majesty  heieanent.  The  tenor 
u  hereof  follows  : 


The  Double  cf  a  Report  of  a  Commission  anent  the  Privileges  of  the  High  Constable 
oj  i)COtland,  which  was  registrate  in  Sir  James  Dalrymple's  Chamber  the  25th 
March  1707',  the  pi  incipal  of  which  is  still  keptinthv  cusiaiy  of  the  Lat  I  o/'Err.ol, 
hereditary  High  Constable  of  the  Kingdom. 

Most  Sacred  Sovereign, 

"  According  to  the  warrant  and  direction  of  the  commission  granted  by  your 
"  Majesty  unto  us  for  trial-taking  of  the  honours  and  privileges  due  to  the  otfice 
"  of  High  Constable  within  this  kingdom,  we  have  kept  sundry  diets  and  meet- 
"  ings  (wherein  the  now  Eail  of  Enol  was  prcient)  and  having  heard  and  consi- 
"  dered  his  claims,  and  the  instructions  and  warrants  produced  by  him  for  verify- 
"  of  the  same,  and  having  likewise  informed  ourselves  what  the  customs  of  other 
"  countries  allow  in  the  like  case,  we  have  hereby  thought  good  to  set  down  our 
"  articles,  our  opinion  and  judgment  concerning  the  said  privileges,  and  there- 
"  withal  to  satisfy  your  Majesty  of  what  we  conceive  to  be  due  and  belonging  to 
"  the  said  Constable  in  the  right  of  his  office.  In  all  royal  ai-mies  and  expeditions, 
"  the  Constable,  in  right  of  his  office,  is  lieutenant-general,  and  supreme  officer 
"  next  unto  the  King.  He  has  the  command,  direction,  and  government  in  the 
"  army,  and  is  proper  and  sole  judge  in  all  military  affairs,  and  in  all  actions  con- 
"  cerning  the  captains,  lieutenants,  their  officers  and  companies,  enduring  their 
"  employment  or  pay  in  the  King's  service,  and  that  according  to  the  custom  uni- 
"  ver^a!ly  observed  in  other  countries,  ido,  It  appears  that  in  former  times,  here, 
"  the  Constable  had  precedency  and  place  next  to  the  Chancellor  with  relation  to 
"  whatsomtver  officers  ;  and,  so  tar  as  we  can  leain,  they  have  been  in  possession 
"  of  the  same  till  of  late  years  that  your  Majesty's  dearest  father,  of  ever  blessed 
"  memory,  was  pleased  to  prefer  the  late  Earl  of  Dumbar  to  be  High  Treasurer 
"  of  this  kingdom,  and  that  your  Majesty's  self  sinsyne  advanced  the  late  Earl  of 
"  Montrose  to  be  President  of  your  Council,  and  the  Earl  of  Haddingtoun  to  be 
"  Lord  Privy  Seal,  ordering  them,  in  the  right  and  warrant  of  their  offices,  to  take 
"  place  successively  in  their  order,  next  unto  the  Chancellor,  like  as  their  suc- 
"  cessors  in  the  said  offices  presently  enjoy  the  same.  y.io,  The  Constable  is  su- 
"  preme  judge  in  all  matters  of  riot,  disorder,  blood,  and  slaughter,  committed 
"  within  four  miles  of  the  King's  person,  or  of  the  Parliament  or  Council  repie- 
"  senting  the  same,  and  the  trial  or  punishment  of  such  crimes  and  offences  is 
"  proper  and  due  to  the  Constable  and  his  deputies,  and  the  provost  and  baillies 
"  of  that  city  or  burgh  ;  and  all  other  judges  within  the  bounds  where  the  said 
"  facts  are  committed,  are  obliged  to  rise,  concur,  fortifie,  and  assist  the  Constable 
"  and  his  deputies  in  taking  the  saids  malefactors,  to  make  their  tolbooth  patent 
"  for  receiving  them  therein  ;  as  was  clearly  verified  by  production  of  warrants 
"  granted  by  your  Majesty's  predecessors  to  that  effect,  and  which  likewise  ap- 
"  peared  by  exhibition  of  certain  bonds  made  by  the  town  of  Edinburgh  to  the 
"  Constable  for  the  time  concerning  that  purpose.  4/0,  The  Constable  has  the 
"  cliarge  of  guarding  the  King's  per^on  in  time  of  Parliament  or  Conventions,  as 
"  also  the  keeping  of  the  Parliament  House  is  committed  to  him,  and  the  keys 
"  thereof  delivered  to  him  for  that  effect ;  he  has  likewise  the  chief  command  of 
"  all  guards  and  men  at  arms  attending  on  the  King's  person  at  such  times.     5/0, 

Vol.  E.  Y  y 


68  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

"  In   time    of  Parliament  the  Constable  rides    on   the  King's  right  hand,    and 

"  carries  a  white  batten  in  token  of  command,  and  accordingly  sitteth  apart  froai 

"  the  rest   of  the  nobility   in  the  Parliament  House  on  the  King's   right  hand, 

"  having  the  honours  lying  before  him.     6to,  Before  the  thirteenth  Parliament  of 

"  King  James  II.  the  Constable  was  in  possession  of  taking  distress  of  all  manner 

"  01  goods  bought  or  sold  in  markets  in  time  of  Session,  General  Councils,  ParLa- 

"  ment  or  Conventions,  which  being  at  that  time  discharged  till  the   Constable 

"  should  clear  his  right  to  the  same  in   the  next  following  Parliament ;  we  find 

"  that  in  the  table  of  the  unprinted  acts,  of  the  fourteenth  Parliament  of  the  said 

"  King,  there  is  mention  made   of  an  act  touching  the  taking  of  strysses   by  the 

*'  Constable,  but   can  find  no  record  thereof  extant  in   the   register,     'jmo,  In  the 

"  original  charter  granted  by  King  Robert  I.  of  glorious  memory,  to  Gilbert  Lord 

"  Hay,  first  Constable  of  that  name,  and  ancestor  to   Earl   of  Errol,  we   find  the 

"  office  of  Constabulary  to  be  given  unto  him  cum  hostilagiis,  as  a  main  and  prin- 

"  cipal  privilege   belonging  to  the  said  office  ;  which   being  a   word  obsolete  and 

"  out  of  use,  and  we  not  knowing  perfectly  the  genuine  sense  and  meaning  there- 

"  of,  and  whether  theti  the  same  did  import  the  liberty  and  right  of  a  lodging  duly 

"  furnished  and  appointed  within  the  king's  house,  (as  many  do  suppose)  or  some 

"  house  in  every  town  where  the  king  did  remain,  or  if  there  be  any  privilege  or 

•'  casuality  imported,  we  have,  in   that   regard,  forborne   to  deliver   our  opinion 

"  concerning  the  same.     As  also  in  putting  the  crown  on  the  king's  head  at  the 

"  time  of  his  coronation.     Which,  with  sundry  other  privileges,  are  only  made  by 

"  the  Constable  to  be  due  to  him  in  the  right  of  his  office,  and  whereof,  as  he  al- 

"  leges  his  predecessors   has  been  prejudged,  and   the  same  brought  into  discoun- 

"  tenance  by  reason  of  the  many  eclipses  which  that  noble    house   from  time  to 

"  time  has  suffered  on  occasion  of  the  loyalty  of  the  most  part  of  his  predecessors, 

"  who,  out  of  zeal  to  the  king's  service,  and  honour  of  their  country,  did  in  their 

"  days  die  worthily  in  battle  before  they  could   gain   the  opportunity  of  time,  or 

"  ripeness  of  years,  to  settle  their  estates,  to  vindicate  the   liberties   due  to   their 

"  place  and  office.     And  this  for  an  account  of  our   proceeding  in  the   execution 

"  of  the  commission  directed  by  your  Majesty  unto  us,  which   we  humbly  lay  to 

"  your  Majesty's   royal  consideration,  praying  God  to  bless  your   Majesty  with 

"  many  long  and  happy  years.     From  Holyroodhouse,  the  27th  day  of  July  1631. 

"  Sk  iubscribitur,  Duplin,  Wigtoun,  Linlithgow,  Wintoun,  Naiper,  Areskike, 

"  Sir  Thomas  Hopj;  of  Balmano,    Archibald  Aitchison,  A.   Fletcher,  Henry. 

"  Bruce."     Extracted  by 

And,  de  facto,  I  find  in  the  orders  for  the  riding  the  Parliaments  of  Scotland  at 
Edinburgh,  in  the  year  1661,  1681,  and  1703,  the  Lord  High  Constable  and 
Marischal,  are  (in  the  morning  of  that  day  the  Parliament  is  to  be  ridden)  to  wait 
on  his  Majesty's  High  Commissioner  at  the  palace  of  Holyroodhouse,  and  to  re- 
ceive his  orders,  and  from  thence,  returning  privately,  the  Constable  is  to  come 
out  of  his  lodging  on  foot,  and  having  viewed  the  rooms  under  and  above  the 
Parliament  House,  put  on  his  robes,  and,  having  his  batton  in  his  hand,  set  him- 
self in  a  chair  at  the  entry  of  the  Parliament  Close  at  the  Lady's  Steps,  by  the 
outmost  of  his  guards,  from  which  he  is  to  rise  and  salute  the  members,  as  they 
alight  from  their  horses,  and  to  recommend  them  to  the  gentlemen  of  his  guards 
to  be  conducted  to  the  Marischal's  guards.  And  at  the  Riding  of  the  Parliament, 
anno  1661,  Gilbert  Earl  of  Errol  Lord  High  Constable  of  Scotland,  received  the 
members  of  that  Parliament  (says  the  author  of  Mercurius  Culcdonius,  page  3.) 
at  their  arrival  at  the  Parliament  Yard,  attended  with  his  guard  of  one  hundred 
gentlemen  of  his  name,  armed  with  swords,  pistols,  and  gilded  pole-axes.  And, 
at  the  return  of  the  members  of  Parliament  back  to  the  palace,  the  Constable  rides 
on  the  High  Commissioner's  rig'nt  hand  with  a  cap  of  permission  on  his  head. 
How  soon  his  Majesty's  High  Commissioner  alights  from  his  horse,  in  his  coming 
to  the  ParHament,  the  Lord  Constable  receives  him,  and  attends  him  to  the  Marischal 
guards,  and  then  both  Constable  and  Marischal  convey  him  bare-lieaded  to  the  throne, 
and  are  in  the  same  manner  to  attend  him  in  his  returning  to  horse.  And  always 
during  the  sitting  of  our  Parliaments,  the  High  Constable  kept. his  guards  without 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  6g 

the  Parliament  House,  and  the  Marischal  his  guards  within  tlie  same;  the  one  to 
keep  the  peace  within,  and  the  other  without  doors. 

The  badge  of  this  high  olhce  in  England,  according  to  Sylvanus  Morgan  in 
his  Sphere  of  Gentry,  /ib.  4.  page  B2.  is  a  staff  or  batten,  ensigned  with  an 
imperial  crown,  and,  on  a  shield,  below  the  same,  on  the  batton,  is  the  King's 
royal  arms ;  which  batton,  he  carries  erect,  in  pale,  at  the  back  of  the  middle  of 
the  escutcheon  of  his  own  armorial  bearing,  as  the  peculiar  ensign  of  that  high 
office. 

But  commonly  the  badge  of  this  office  was,  and  is,  a  naked  sword,  which,  in 
the  Roman  Empire,  was  the  badge  of  the  office,  prafccti  preetorio  ;  and  the  Em- 
peror Trajan  giving  the  naked  saord  to  Sure  Licernius,  who  was  his  prafectus 
pfcvtorio,  gives  it  with  these  words, /»ro  me  si  nicreor  in  me;  which  words  were 
thereafter  put,  by  Buchanan,  with  a  naked  sword,  on  the  money  coined  during  the 
minority  of  King  James  VI. 

The  first  Lord  Constable  oi  Scotland  that  I  have  discovered,  was  Richard  Mor- 
ville,  whom  I  find,  in  Sir  James  Balfour  of  Denmiln's  Collections,  to  have  flourish- 
ed in  the  reign  of  King  William  the  Lion;  and  next  David  Cuming  Earl  of  Athol 
and  Lord  Strathbogie,  of  whom  1  read  also  in  the  said  Sir  James  Balfour's  Genea- 
alos;ical  Account  of  the  Nobility  of  Scotland,  who  gave  three  merks  of  money 
yearly  to  the  monks  of  Inchaffray  in  Perthshire  by  a  donation  under  his  seal, 
which  beginneth  thus,  "  David  de  Cumine  Comes  de  Atholiae  Dominus  de  Strath- 
"  bolgie  6^  Constabularius  Scotiae,"  61-c.  Which  donation  is  confirmed  by  King 
Alexander  IL  in  the  year  1239.  Afterwards  this  high  office  became  heretable  in 
the  noble  family  of  the  Earl  of  Errol.  For  Gilbert  de  la  Hay  Lord  Hay  of  Er- 
rol,  (as  says  Sir  George  Mackenzie  in  his  MS.  Collections  of  the  Scottish  Famihes, 
and  Lewis  Moreri  in  his  Lirge  Historical  Dictionary)  closely  adhering  to  King 
Robert  L  in  all  his  troubles,  when  almost  the  whole  nation  had  submitted  to  the  Bali- 
ol;  in  consideration  of  his  loyalty,  was,  by  the  favour  of  this  warlike  prince,  creat- 
ed Lord  High  Constable  of  Scotland,  in  the  sixtli  year  of  his  reign,  which  was 
A.  Dom.  1312,  and  which  office  was  granted  to  him  and  his  heirs,  and  is  still  en- 
joyed by  them.  John,  late  Earl  of  Errol,  having  matriculated  his  armorial  bear- 
ing in  the  Lord  Lyon's  New  Register,  carries  as  the  symbol  of  his  high  office  of 
Constable  at  the  foot  of  his  shield  on  each  side  thereof,  an  arm  gauntlated  fesse- 
ways  issuing  out  of  a  cloud,  and  grasping  a  naked  sword  erected  in  pale  at 
the  dexter  and  sinister  sides  of  his  escutcheon  of  arms,  all  proper,  hiked  and 
pommelled  or.  The  figure  whereof,  as  cut  on  copper,  the  curious  may  see  in  Sir 
George  Mackenzie's  Science  of  Heraldry. 

The  French  High  Constable  makes  use  of  the  like  badge  as  the  ensign  of  his  of- 
fice. And,  as  to  the  antiquity  of  this  practice  with  them,  Menestrier,  in  his  Sci- 
ence of  Heraldry,  gives  us  an  instance  of  the  arms  of  Matthew  Lord  Montmo- 
rency, Constable  of  France,  who  died  in  the  year  1239,  on  whose  sepulchral  mo- 
nument between  two  swords  is  placed  his  shield  of  arms  ;  and  though,  as  he  tells 
us,  the  monument  appears  not  to  be  so  old,  yet  (says  he)  I  have  seen  other  in- 
stances of  the  same  as  old. 

The  same  author,  speaking  of  the  King's  Master  of  Horses  in  France,  as  an  of- 
fice subaltern,  and  dependent  of  the  High  Constable,  was  in  use  to  place  at  the 
sides  of  his  shield  of  arms,  two  swords  in  their  scabbards,  azure,  seme  of  flower- 
de-luces  or,  with  their  belts  rolled  round  them,  to  difference  them  from  these  of 
the  Constables.  And  Monsieur  Baron,  in  his  Art  of  Heraldry,  gives  us  the  shield 
of  arms  of  Lewis  de  Loraine,  Count  de  Armagnac,  Grand  Ecuyer  de  France  to 
Lewis  XIV.  King  of  France,  who,  as  the  badge  of  his  said  office,  carries  below 
his  shield  two  swords  in  their  scabbards  placed  bend-ways,  with  their  belts  wrapt 
round  them,  seme  of  flower-de-luces,  hilted  and  pommelled  or.  The  Master  of 
Horses  is  called  there  Ecuyer,  from  ecu,  a  shield,  because,  by  his  office,  he  carried 
one  before  the  king. 

The  High  Marischal  is  a  name  which  we  have  borrowed  from  the  French,  who, 
write  it  m'irechal,  and  they  have  several  of  them,  being  the  generals  of  their 
armies.  The  Earl  Marshal  of  England  is  a  post  of  great  Honour,  and  takes  cog- 
nizance, as  the  High  Constable  did,  of  all  matters  of  war  and  arms  (says  Miege) 
wherein  he  is  commonly  guided  by  the  civil  law.  This  post  is  now  hereditary  in 
the  family  of  the  Duke  ot  Norfolk.     For  Thomas    Mowbray  Earl  of  Nottingham, 


70  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

was  the  first  that  was  invested  with  the  title  and  office  of  Eavl  Marshal,  by  King. 
Richard  II.  in  the  year  1385;  which  dignified  office  continues  now  in  the  saidDake 
of  Norfolk's  family,  who  enjoys  it  at  this  day  heritably,  as  being  descended  by 
the  mother's  side  from  the  said  Thomas  Mowbray. 

Sir  William  Segar,  Garter  Principal  King  ol  Arms,  tells  us,  "  That  the  Earl 
"  Marshal  of  England  a  an  Earl  by  office,  and  so  is  no  other  earl  in  England  but 
"  he."  The  Earls  Marshal  ha^'e  sometimes  been  the  king's  lieutenant-generals  in 
martial  affairs,  and,  by  their  office  of  marshalship,  have  had  power  and  authority  to 
hear  and  determine  judicially  of  questions,  doubts,  and  difteiences  between  parties 
concerning  honour  and  arms.  And,  to  that  end,  tue  Earl  Marshal  held  a  court  of 
judicature,  called  the  Earl  Marshal's  Court ;  as  when  arms  are  usurped  and  un- 
justly borne,  the  Lail  lias  power  to  disclaim  the  same,  and  to  punish  the  parties  that 
shall  falsely  assume  and  take  upon  them  the  armories  of  another,  by  the  name  and 
title  of  a  Gentleman,  when  tliey  are  not  so  to  be  approved.  The  Earl  Marshal  has 
power  also,  by  special  commission  under  the  Great  seal  of  England,  over  the  College 
of  Heralds,  prohibiting  the  provincial  kings  of  arms  to  give  and  grant  any  new 
coats  of  arms  without  his  Lordship's  consent.  His  Lordsliip  estabhshes  orders 
among  the  heralds,  for  their  better  rule  and  government  ;  and  any  doubt  or 
question  which  they  cannot  decide  among  themselves,  they  reter  that  to  the  arbi- 
triment  and  judgment  of  the  Earl  Marshal.  His  Lordship  gives  them  their  solemn 
creations  according  to  their  degrees,  viz.  Kings  ot  Arms,  Heralds,  and  Pursuivants. 
The  Earl  keeps  his  court  either  at  Westminster,  in  the  painted  chamber  adjoining 
to  the  Parliament  House,  or  in  his  own  house  ;  where,  in  the  great  hall,  is  a  large 
square  table,  with  rails  about  it,  and  benches  within,  and  an  half-pace  raised  abo\e 
the  same.  There  the  Earl  sits  in  the  midst,  with  divers  noblemen,  and  sometimes 
judges  on  either  side,  according  to  the  cause  in  hand,  to  the  end  that,  with  their 
advice  and  counsel,  he  may  the  more  legally  proceed.  And  here  the  College  of 
Heralds  sit  as  his  council  or  assistants  in  their  rich  coats  of  arms.  His  Lordship 
has  belonging  to  the  said  court  a  pui'suivant-messenger  that  serves  his  precepts  and 
summons.  He  has  also  a  crier  that  stands  on  a  corner  of  the  stage  ;  a  doctor  of 
the  civil  law,  who  sits  within  the  rails  over  against  the  Earl,  to  resolve  doubts. 
The  register  or  clerk  of  the  court  sits  before  his  Lordship's  foot,  on  either  side 
of  whom  the  officers  of  arms  are  placed  to  give  their  opinions,  being  required. 
Without  the  rails  stand  the  lawyers  that  plead,  as  sergeants  and  counsellors  of  the 
law,  and  sometimes  doctors  and  proctors  of  the  civil  law,  as  the  cause  does  re- 
quire. The  messengers  having  returned  the  process  and  summons  into  the  court, 
the  crier  calls  the  parties  whom  the  cause  concerns;  they  present  their  petition 
or  bill  of  complaint;  the  register  reads  the  same;  the  lawyers  plead  pio  et  contra 
thereunto.  And  before  the  decision  the  court  takes  bond  ot  the  parties  to  stand 
to  the  award  and  order  of  the  Court  Marshal.  When  the  court  is  to  be  dismissed 
and  prorogued  for  that  time,  the  register  pronounces  the  prorogation,  and  the 
crier  proclaims  it  aloud,  appointing  a  day,  as  his  Lordship  shall  please,  for  the  pro- 
ducing of  witnesses,  for  further  hearing,  or  a  final  determination  and  judgment.  But  if 
the  cause  concerns  the  claim  of  dignities,  as  for  baronies,  or  earldoms,  or  honour- 
able offices,  which  differences  happen  sometimes  between  heirs-male  and  .  heirs- 
general,  then  the  party  plaintiff  exhibits  his  or  her  petition  to  the  King's  Majesty, 
and  the  king  refers  that  to  be  judicially  heard  in  the  Court  Marshal.  There,  as 
that  is  found,  the  Earl  Marshal  advertises  the  king  how  he  finds  the  right  of  the 
claim  to  be,  and  leaves  the  decision  thereof  to  the  king.  In  this  case  the  warrants 
are  set  forth  in  the  king's  name,  for  the  appearance  of  the  parties  in  the 
Court  Marshal,  and  are  served  or  summoned  by  an  officer  of  arms,  with  the  other 
ibrmalities  of  the  return  ;  and,  if  the  cause  be  doubtful  or  ambiguous,  it  is  some- 
times referred  to  be  heard  and  determined  by  the  House  of  Peers.  The  Earl 
Marshal  bears  a  staff  of  metal,  gilt  with  gold,  at  either  end  tipped  with  black, 
enamelled  :  Which  staff  King  Richard  II.  in  the  twenty-first  of  his  reign, 
granted  to  Tliomas  Holland  Duke  of  Surrey,  Earl  Marshal  of  England.  In  time 
of  war,  with  this  golden  staff  he  marshals  and  orders  battles  in  the  field,  and  has 
the  leading  of  the  van-guard  ;  and  in  time  of  peace,  he  bears  it  usually  at  his  plea- 
sure, but  especially  on  festival  days  at  the  court,  and  in  solemn  and  royal  proceed- 
ings before  the  king,  and  takes  his  place  ^vlth  the   Lord  Great   Chamberlain,  or 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  71 

the  Constable,  next  before  the  sword.  The  Earl  Marshal  is  placed,  by  act  of  Tar- 
liament,  31.  Henry  VIU.  next  after  the  Lord  Great  Chamberlain  and  the  Con- 
stable, and  before  the  Lord  High  Admiral,  and  the  Lord  Steward,  and  the  Lord 
Chamberlain  of  the  King's  House.  At  the  coronation  of  the  king  the  Earl  Mar- 
shal appear  in  liis  robes,  with  his  coronet  in  his  hand  and  his  statY,  and  has  the 
ordering  of  the  abbey  of  Westminster,  and  sees  the  regalities  and  robes  of  King  Ed- 
ward the  Confessor  to  be  in  a  readiness.  He  appoints  the  building  of  the  scallbld 
whereon  the  king  is  to  be  crowned,  and  gives  orders  to  the  gentlemen-ushers  for 
the  covering  and  furnishing  thereof  with  hangings,  chairs,  traverses,  carpets, 
cusiiions,  &-C.  especially  the  sie^e  royal  whereon  the  king  is  to  be  crowned.  At 
which  time  the  Earl  Marshal  is  one  of  those  that  does  all  the  nearest  ollkes  to  the 
king's  person,  as  to  help  to  lead  him,  and  to  support  his  majesty  in  his  chair,  put  1 
ting  his  hand,  with  others  of  the  nobility,  to  set  the  crown  on  his  majesty's  head, 
doing  his  homage  first,  and  then  presenting  all  others  of  the  nobility.  The  Earl 
Marshal  appoints  what  number  of  Knights  of  the  Bath  are  to  be  made  at  the 
coronation  of  the  king,  and  makes  election  of  them.  The  day  being  come,  the  Earl 
Marshal  with  the  Lord  Chamberlain,  gives  them  their  oath,  after  they  are  all 
bathed ;  he  also  presents  them  to  the  king  the  same  day  to  receive  the  Order  of 
Knighthood.  Of  every  Knight  of  the  Bath  the  Earl  Marshal  receives  a  fee 
in  money  viz.  five  pounds  for  the  horse  the  knight  rides  upon,  and  a  merk 
for  the  horse's  furniture,  or  composition  for  the  same.  And  at  the  creation  of  a 
duke,  marquis,  or  earl,  the  Earl  Marshal  ought  to  have  his  furniture,  or  composition 
for  the  same ;  and  by  ancient  custom  he  has  had  the  same  of  archbishops,  bishops, 
and  abbots,  at  their  consecrations.  At  the  funeral  obsequies  of  kings,  queens, 
and  princes,  the  Earl  Marshal  is  a  chief  commissioner  appointed  with  the  Lord 
Treasurer,  the  Lord  Chamberlain,  &-c.  to  give  orders  to  the  wardrobe  for  the  dis- 
tribution of  black  for  the  mourners,  velvet  for  the  hearse,  palls  of  cloth  of  gold, 
escutcheons,  banners,  and  hachements,  giving  charge  to  the  officers  of  arms  to  give 
their  attendance,  and  to  see  all  things  royally  and  princely  performed.  At  com- 
bats, barriers,  tournaments,  and  jousts  royal,  the  Earl  Marshal  is  the  chiefest 
officer  to  see  tljera  duly  performed,  to  appoint  judges,  and  to  ride  round  the  lists 
and  order  all  things ;  at  which  time  the  Knight  Marshal  is  but  his  attendant. 
Toucliing  duels  and  private  quarrels  between  gentlemen,  growing  upon  disgraceful 
words,  blows,  or  challenges,  the  Earl  Marshal  has  power  and  authority  to  stay  and 
commit  the  persons,  confining  them,  and  taking  sufficient  bonds  for  their  good 
bearing  and  forthcoming,  compelling  the  oft'enders  to  make  satisfaction  W  the 
parties  injured,  according  to  the  form  and  advice  of  a  book  published  in  print  for 
that  effect,  by  the  appointment  of  King  James  L 

Mr  Miege,  in  his  State  of  South  Britain,  also  tells  us,  "  It  is  the  Earl  Marshal 
•'  who,  with  the  assistance  of  the  Kings  at  Arms  and  Heralds,  marshals  and  orders 
•'  the  proclamation  and  coronation  of  oui-  kings,  their  marriages,  funerals,  caval- 
"  cades,  royal  interviews,  and  feasts,  Si-c.  or  when  either  peace  or  war  with  a 
"  foreign  power  is  proclaimed  :  And  is  also  judge  of  the  coats  of  arms,  and  of  the 
"  pedigrees  of  the  nobility  and  gentry  :  and  therefore  keeps  a  court  of  chivalry  in 
"  the  common  hall  of  the  college  of  heralds  in  London.  And  whoever  desires  a 
"  coat  of  arms,  must  first  apply  himself  to  the  Earl  Marshal  by  petition,  with  a 
"  certificate  annexed  as  to  his  being  qualified  for  it ;  which  being  approved  ot  by 
"  his  Lordship,  an  order  is  directed  by  him  to  Gai-ter  King  at  Arms,  and  another 
"  of  the  Kings  at  Arms,  being  of  that  province  where  the  petitioner  resides,  to 
"  devise  arms  for  him,  and  prepare  him  a  grant,  with  the  coat  blazoned  in  colours 
"  in  the  margin  thereof:  in  which  grant  it  is  expressly  said,  that  none  at  his  peril 
"  do  presume  to  bear  the  same  coat." 

Sir  George  Mackenzie,  in  his  Precedency,  page  42.  tells  us,  "  That  the  word 
"  Mariscbal  is  a  German  word  and  office  originally,  as  the  learned  Tillet  proves 
•'  fully,  a  marker  of  camps.  And  the  axe  which  he  bears  as  tlie  badge  of  his  ofiice, 
"  is  delegated  to  the  Marechal  du  Camj).  The  Marshal  commanded  the  horse,  as 
"-  Tillet  proves ;  whereas  the  Constable  commanded  both  :  but  yet  our  learned 
"  Craig  calls  the  Constable  only  Prafectus  Equitum  ;  and  yet,  as  Tillet  observes, 
"  the  Marshal  was  not  under  the  Constable,  else  he  could  not  be  an  officer  of  the 

Yql.  IL  7,  I. 


72  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

"  crown,  and  officers  of  state  do  depend  upon  none  but  the  king.  Of  old  I  find 
"  the  orders  in  mihtary  cases  run  to  our  Constable  and  Marshal." 

It  is  presumable  that  our  Earl  Marischal  in  Scotland  is  honoured  with  the  like 
privileges  as  the  Earl  Marshal  of  England :  For  the  office  of  Marischal  has  never 
been  out  of  the  family  of  Keith:  But  the  Earls  of  Athol  and  several  others  have 
been  Constables  of  Scotland ;  and  therefore  it  is  that  the  Earl  Marischal  with  us 
hath  no  other  title,  whereas  the  High  Constable  designs  himself  Earl  of  Errol. 
Our  High  Marischal  has  been,  like  those  of  England,  Lieutenant-General  in  martial 
affairs.  And  Sir  Robert  Keith,  our  great  Marischal,  accompanied  Edward  Bruce 
when  he  went  to  take  possession  of  the  crown  of  Ireland,  and  did  him  notable 
service  at  taking  in  of  Dubhn  Castle,  and  kept  close  to  the  interest  of  King  Robert 
the  Bruce  in  all  his  troubles:  He  was  the  chief  instrument  in  gaining  the  battle  of 
Inveruiy,  which  was  the  first  that  ever  that  great  prince  won  ;  And  at  the  battle 
of  Bannockburn  he  commanded  500  horse,  being  the  person  that  gave  the  first 
onset,  and  defeat  a  party  of  the  English  horse  sent  to  reinforce  Philip  Mowbray, 
Governor  of  Stirling,  which  made  way  for  that  glorious  victory  the  Scots  there 
obtained.  And  at  last  died  fighting  most  valiantly  at  the  battle  of  DupHn,  "  Cum 
"  magno  propinquorum  &-  clientium  numero,"  says  Buchanan.  Sir  Robert  Keith 
was  a  man  of  great  courage,  and  the  main  instrument  of  driving  Edward  Baliol 
out  of  the  country,  and  restoring  King  David  Bruce.  And  Sir  William,  Lord 
Keith,  whose  father,  Sir  Edward  first  Lord  Keith,  being  indisposed  when  the  battle 
of  Otterburn  was  about  to  be  foughten,  supplied  his  father's  place  as  High  Maris- 
chal. And  being  a  man  of  great  valour,  went  to  the  said  battle,  where,  after  James 
the  second  Earl  of  Douglas,  then  General  of  the  Scots  army,  was  killed,  and  the 
English  like  to  prove  victors,  he,  as  High  Marischal,  took  on  him  the  chief  com- 
mand of  the  army  :  and  being  a  nobleman  of  intrepid  courage,  recovered  the 
battle,  beat  the  English,  and  took  Ralph  Percy  (brother  to,  and  conjunct  com- 
mander with,  Henry  Hotspur  son  to  the  Earl  of  Northumberland)  prisoner  with  his 
own  hand.  But  fearing  I  should  prove  too  prolix  in  enumerating  the  valiant  actions 
of  the  heroes  of  this  noble  and  ancient  family,  I  proceed  to  acquaint  ray  reader 
that  our  Earl  Marischal  kept  also  a  court  called  the  Marischal  Const. 

In  this  court  his  Lordship  hath  power  and  authority  to  hear  and  determine  ju- 
dicially of  questions,  doubts,  and  differences,  between  parties,  concerning  hon- 
our and  arms ;  as  also  touching  duels  and  private  quarrels  between  gentle- 
men, arising  from  disgraceful  words,  blows,  or  challenges.  He  also,  as  the  Earl 
Marshal  of  England,  has  power  and  authority  to  stay  and  commit  the  persons, 
confining  them,  and  taking  sufficient  bonds  for  their  good  a-bearing  and  forthcom- 
ing, compelling  the  offenders  to  make  satisfaction  to  the  parties  injured.  To 
prove  this,  I  shall  here  insert  an  order  of  this  court,  taken  from  the  principal  copy, 
signed  by  the  clerk  of  the  said  court,  whereof  the  tenor  follows. 

"  The  Marischal  Court  of  the  kingdom  of  Scotland,  holden  at  Leith  the  21st 
"  June  1633,  by  a  noble  Earl  William,  Earl  Marischal,  Lord  Keith  and  Altree, 
"  &-C.  Great  Marischal  of  the  kingdom,  members  of  court  chosen,  suits  called,  the 
"  court  lawfully  fenced  and  affirmed. 

"  The  which  day  anent  the  riot  committed  between  Francis  Stewart,  son  lawful 
"  to  John  Stewart  of  Coldingham,  and  Malcom  Crawfurd  of  Newtoun,  in  their 
"  injuring  of  others,  and  appeilling  others  to  combat  contrary  to  the  laws  of  this 
"  realm,  to  the  disturbance  of  his  majesty's  peace,  and  offence  of  his  majesty,  baith 
"  the  said  parties  being  present,  and  confessing  the  same,  the  said  Earl  decerned 
"  them  to  keep  his  majesty's  peace  in  time  coming;  and  for  that  effect  to  act  them- 
"  selves  as  follows,  and  to  agree  together,  and  chope  hands,  which  they  particular- 
"  ly  did. 

"  The  which  day  the  said  parties  actit  themselves,  aither  of  them  to  others  for 
"  their  indemnities,  and  for  keeping  his  majesty's  peace,  aither  of  them  to  others, 
"  under  the  penalty  of  one  thousand  pounds,  toties  quoiids.     Sic  subscribitur, 

F.  Stewart,  J.  Caresburne. 

R.  Keith,  clerk  of  the  said  couit. 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  7  V 

At  the  Riding  of  our  Parliament  I  find  the  Constable  and  Marischal  guards  of 
partizans  are  to  make  a  lane  from  that  entry  to  the  Parliament  Close,  called  the 
Lady's  Steps,  to  the  Parliament  House,  those  of  the  Constable's  without,  and  those  of 
the  Marischal  within  the  house,  allowing  the  Constable  six  of  his  guard  within 
doors,  conform  to  ancient  practice.  And  here  I  take  occasion  to  insert  what  I 
should  have  mentioned  before,  viz. I  find  by  the  Privy  Council  Registers,  anno  1633, 
that  the  foresaid  report  of  a  commission,  concerning  the  privileges  of  the  High 
Constable,  was  approved  of  by  his  majesty.  But  as  to  that  part  of  it,  alleging  the 
Constable  to  be  superior  judge  in  all  matters  of  riot, '  disorder,  blood,  and  slaughter, 
committed  within  four  miles  of  his  majesty's  person,  or  of  the  parliament,  or  coun- 
cil representing  the  royal  authority  in  his  absence  ;  and  that  the  trying  and 
punishing  of  such  crimes  and  offences  is  only  proper  and  due  to  him.  The  royal 
burghs  of  this  kingdom  pretended  some  prejudice  to  be  done  them  in  that  report, 
particularly  the  city  of  Edinburgh,  who  produced  charters  from  K.ing  James  HI. 
and  other  of  our  kings,  ratified  in  parliament,  by  which  the  magistrates  of  that 
city  are  made  and  constitute  heritable  sheriffs  within  themselves,  and  afterwards 
justices  of  peace  within  Edinburgh  and  Leith  ;  whereupon  his  majesty  was  pleased 
by  his  letter  to  the  Lords  of  his  said  Council,  dated  at  Greenwich,  May  14,  1633, 
to  will  them  to  call  the  commissioners  of  the  burghs  before  them  to  hear  their  ob- 
jections concerning  this  affair,  and  to  report.  The  council  finding  the  Lords  of 
Session  judges  competent  thereto,  remits  the  same  to  their  solution.  But 
as  to  their  determination  on  the  head,  I  refer  to  their  decision  about  that 
time. 

The  Constable  and  Marischal,  in  the  morning  of  that  day  the  Parliament  is  to  be 
ridden,  do  wait  on  his  majesty,  or,  in  his  absence,on  his  High  Commissioner  at  the 
palace,  to  receive  his  orders :  and  from  thence  the  Marischal  returns  privately, 
and  goes  and  puts  on  his  robes ;  and  being  set  in  a  chair  at  the  head  of  his  guards, 
near  the  entry  to  the  Parliament  House,  he  there  attends  in  his  robes  with  his  bat- 
ton  in  his  hand,  and  from  his  chair  arises  and  receives  the  members  as  they  enter 
the  door.  And  when  the  king  or  his  commissioner  enters  the  house,  then  both  the 
Constable  and  Marischal  convoy  him  bareheaded  to  the  throne,  and  are  in  the  like 
manner  to  attend  him  in  his  return  to  horse  :  Afterwards  the  Marischal  takes  horse, 
and  rides  with  him  on  his  left  hand  to  the  palace,  having  on  a  cap  of  permission, 
and  clothed  in  his  robes. 

We  had  no  Knight  Marischal  in  Scotland,  as  they  have  in  England,  till  Kinp- 
Charles  I.  his  coronation  in  the  year  1633,  at  which  time  it  was  erected  by  a  letter 
to  the  Privy  Council.  And  Sir  George  Mackenzie,  in  his  Precedency,  page  42, 
tells  us,  "  That  this  officer,  by  his  office,  is  to  take  place  immediately  after  the 
"  younger  sons  of  lords."  And  after  the  restoration  of  King  Charles  II.  January 
I,  i66i,  the  Earl  Marischal,  accompanied  with  four  hundred  gentlemen  of  his  own 
relations,  marched  on  foot  from  his  own  lodgings  to  his  majesty's  palace  of  Holyrood- 
house,  (then  the  residence  of  the  Earl  of  Middleton,  his  Majesty's  High  Commis- 
sioner) with  the  honours  of  the  kingdom,  viz.  he  himself  carrying  the  crown.  Co- 
lonel George  Keith  his  second  brother  the  sceptre,  and  the  youngest.  Sir  John  Keith, 
the  sword:  And  when  the  two  eldest  of  these  brothers  were  prisoners  in  England 
for  their  loyalty,  by  the  particular  care  and  industry  of  the  youngest,  the  same 
honours  (so  much  hunted  after  by  the  English  then  our  enemies)  were  miracul- 
ously preserved:  For  which  his  said  Majesty  King  Charles  II.  deservedly  conferred 
upon  him  the  honour  of  Knight  Marischal  of  Scotland. 

Our  Earl  Marischal  was  also  heritable  keeper  of  the  regalia  of  the  kingdom,  viz. 
the  crown,  sceptre,  and  sword.  And  after  the  rising  of  the  Parliament,  wherein 
the  union  with  England  was  concluded,  WiUiam  Wilson,  one  of  the  under-clerks 
of  Session,  as  Depute-Marischal  of  Scotland,  upon  his  delivering  up  of  the  said  ho- 
nours, took  the  following  protest,  viz. 

Protest  taken  by  William  Wilson,  one  of  the  under-clerks  of  Session,  as  De- 
pute-Marischal of  Scotland,  upon  his  delivering  up  of  the  honours  to  David  Earl 
of  Glasgow,  Treasurer-depute,  after  the  rising  of  the  Union  Parliament,  anno 
1707. 

"  At  the  Castle  of  Edinburgh,  within  the  crown-room  there,  betwixt  the  hours 
"  of  one  and  two  afternoon  of  the  26th  day  of  March,  in  the  one  thousand  seven 


74  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

"  hundred  and  seventh  year  of  our  Lord,  and  sixth  year  of  the  reign  of  her  Ma- 
"  jesty  Anne,  by  the  Grace  of  God  Queen  of  Scotland,  England,  France,  and  Ire- 
"  land,  Defender  of  the  Faith,  &c. 

"  The  which  day,  in  presence  of  us  notars-public,  and  witnesses  undersubscribing, 
"  compeared  personally  William  Wikon,  one  of  the  Under-Clerks  of  Session, 
"  Depute-Marischal,  for  himself,  and  as  procurator  for,  and  in  name  and  behalf  of 
"  William  Earl  Marischal,  Lord  Keith  and  Altree,  Great  Marischal  of  the  King- 
"  dom  of  Scotland,  Heritable  Keeper  of  the  Regalia  thereof,  viz.  crown,  sceptre 
•'  and  sword;  and  there,  in  presence  of  David  Earl  of  Glasgow,  Lord  Boyle,  &.c. 
"  Lord  Treasarer-Depute,  who,  for  himself,  and  in  name  of  the  remanent  Lords 
"  Commissioners  of  the  Treasury,  was  present  to  receive  the  above  regalia;  the 
"  said  William  Wilson,  afterwards  producing  and  reading  a  procuratory  granted 
"  by  the  said  noble  earl  to  him,  of  the  contents  therein  and  after  mentioned,  dated 
•'  and  registrated  in  the  books  of  Council  and  Session,  on  the  25th  of  March  in- 
"  stant,  did  also  produce  to  the  said  Lord  Treasurer-Depute  a  schedule  signed  by 
"  him  and  the  notars-public  undersubscribing,  containing  an  inventory  and  par- 
"   ticular  description  of  the  said  regalia. 

"  And  thereafter,  upon  the  delivery  of  the  above  regalia  to  the  said  Lord  Trea- 
"  surer-Depute,  and  upon  lodging  thereof,  with  the  foresaid  description  of  the 
"  same,  in  an  orderly  manner,  in  a  chest  within  the  said  crown-room,  the  said 
"  William  Wilson,  as  procurator  foresaid,  and  in  nam(f  and  behalf  of  the  said  Earl 
"  Marischal,  and  in  the  terms  of  the  said  procuratory,  protested,  that  the  delivery 
"  up  of  the  regalia  foresaid  shall  not  invalidate,  or  be  prejudicial  to  the  said  Earl 
"  Marischal  his  heritable  right  of  keeping  thereof,  both  in  time  of  Parliament  and 
"  intervals,  either  in  the  said  earl  his  castle  of  Dunotter,  as  heretofore  his  ancestors 
"  have  done,  or  any  other  else  within  the  kingdom  of  Scotland,  that  his  lordship 
"  and  his  successors  shall  think  secure  and  convenient.  Also  in  terms  of  the 
"  act  ratifying  the  Union  between  the  kingdoms  of  Scotland  and  England, 
"  whereby  it  is  stipulated  and  agreed  by  both  Parhaments,  "  That  the  crown, 
"  sceptre,  and  sword  of  state,  shall  be  continued  to  be  kept  as  they  are  at  present 
"  within  this  kingdom  of  Scotland,  and  that  they  shall  remain  so  in  all  time 
"  coming,  notwithstanding  of  the  Union,"  protested.  That  they  shall  remain  with- 
"  in  the  said  crown-room  of  the  castle  of  Edinburgh :  and  in  case  the  government 
"  shall  find  the  transportation  thereof  from  Edinburgh  castle,  to  any  other  secure. 
"  place  within  this  kingdorn,  at  any  time  thereafter  necessary,  protested  also.  That 
"  the  same  may  not  be  done  until  intimation  be  made  to  the  said  Earl  Marischal 
"  and  his  successors,  to  the  effect  his  lordship  or  they  may  attend  and  see  the 
"  same  safely  transported,  and  securely  lodged :  And  made  due  and  lawful  intima- 
"  tion  of  the  premisses  to  Colonel  James  Stewart,  Depute-G.overnor  of  the  said 
"  Castle,  then  present,  that  he  might  pretend  no  ignorance.  And  also  as  procura- 
"  tor  foresaid,  and  likewise  for  himself,  as  continued  keeper  of  the  regalia,  by  de- 
"  putation  from  the  said  Earl  Marischal,  and  the  deceased  George  Earl  Marischal  his 
"  father,  since  the  3d  day  of  August  1681  years,  in  the  reigns  of  King  Charles  II. 
"  King  James  VII.  King  William  and  Qiieen  Mary,  and  her  present  Majesty 
"  Queen  Anne,  declared,  that  the  same  were  now  delivered  to  the  said  David  Earl 
"  of  Glasgow,  Lord  Treasurer-Depute,  for  himself,  and  in  name  foresaid,  and  in 
"  the  same  state,  case  and  condition  he  then  received  the  same;  and  offered  to 
"  give  his  oath,  that  the  said  William  Wilson,  nor  none  to  his  knov/ledge,  has  ever 
"  directly  or  indirectly  embezzled  or  taken  away  from  the  said  regalia  any  of  the 
"  jewels,  pearls,  or  others  appertaining  thereto:  And,  therefore,  seeing  he  had  with 
"  exact  care,  and  continued  fidelity  and  honesty,  discharged  the  said  trust  reposed- 
"  in  him,  did  protest  to  be  liberate  and  exonerate  for  his  administration  in  the  said 
"  office,  during  the  said  bygone  space,  but  prejudice  to  the  said  Earl  Marischal  of 
"  keeping  the  same  in  all  time  coming  as  formerly,  by  himself,  and  the  said  Wil- 
"  liam  Wilson  as  his  depute,  or  any  other  whom  his  Lordship  shall  appoint;  and 
"  upon  all  and  sundry  the  premisses,  the  said  William  Wilson  and  his  procurator 
"  for,  and  in  name  and  behalf  of  the  said  William  Earl  Marischal,  asked,  and  took 
"  instruments  ane  or  mae  in  the  hands  of  us  notars-public  undersubscribing. 
"  Thir  thin,:^s  were  done  time  and  place  above-mentioned,  before  and  in  presence 
"  of  Mr  David  LesUe,  son  to  the  Earl  of  Leven,   Governor  of  the  Castle  of  Edin- 


E-XTERIOR  ORTSfAMENTS.  75 

"  burgh,  Sir  James  Mackenzie,  Knight  and  Baronet,  Clerk  of  the  Treasui-y,  George 
"  Allardice  of  that  Ilk,  Captain  John  Cockburn,  son  to  the  deceased  Mr  John 
"  Cockburn,  advocate,  Francis  Dunlop  of  that  Ilk,  William  Morison  of  Preston- 
"  grange,  James  Malcolm  of  Grange,  and  Captain  Patrick  Auchmoutie,  two  c-f 
"  the  Earl  Marischal's  battoneers,  John  Barclay  of  Culernie,  Patrick  Durham  of 
"  Omachie,  Mr  George  Areskine,  son  to  Sir  John  Areskine  of  Balgonie,  deceased, 
"  William  Murray,  writer  to  the  signet,  Thomas  Gibson,  writer  in  Edinburgh,  son 
"  to  the  deceased  Sir  Alexander  Gibson  of  Pentland,  one  of  the  Clerks  of  Session, 
"  Mungo  Smith,  John  Reid,  Walter  Murray,  and  Robert  Bull,  merchants  in  Edin- 
"•  burgh,  Mr  Johir  Corsar,  Alexander  Keitii,  George  Forbes,  Alexander  Faiquhar- 
"  son,  and  Alexander  Johnston,  writers  in  Edinburgh,  John  Hog  and  David 
"  Graham,  Macers  of  Privy  Council,  Charles  Maitland,  John  Adam,  Andrew 
"  Graham  of  Jordanston,  and  Patrick  Grant  of  Bunhard,  four  Macers  of  Session, 
"  John  Letham,  her  Majesty's-  Smith,  David  Graham,  eldest  lawful  son  to  Cap- 
"  tain  David  Graham,  Macerof  Privy  Council,  William  Robertson,  non  to  William 
"  Robertson,  one  of  the  Under-Clerks  of  Session,  Robert  Douglas,  eldest  lawful  son 
"  to  Rohei't  Douglas  of  Milcraig,  merchant  in  Edinburgh,  with  divers  other  wit- 
"  nesses  specially  called  and  required  to  the  premisses.  Et  ego  vero  WiUielmus 
"  Robertson,  Georgius  Cockbiini,  ^-Uexandcr  Alison,  IVillielmus  Brown,  Alexander 
"  BaiUie,  Joannes  Corss,  and  Robertas  Bamiatityne,  all  notars-public  subscribing 
"  and  subjoining  their  notes  hereto." 

Several  exact  copies  of  this  protest  Mr  Wilson  sent  to  the  four  universities  of  the 
kingdom,  also  to  the  Faculty  of  Advocates,  and  College  of  Physicians,  as  also  to 
the  Earls  of  Errol  and  Marischal,  who  received  the  same  as  a  great  fayour  done 
them,  and  returned  him  their  several  missives  of  thanks  therefore.  The  Earl  of 
Marischal's  missive  to  him  upon  the  foregoing  account  1  subjoin  as  follows. 

"  Affectionate  Friend, 
"  I  received  the  instrument  of  the  delivery  of  the  regalia,  which  I  acknowledge 
"  a  great  service  done  by  you  to  me  and  my  family,  and  yet  a  greater  to  the  na- 
"  tion  in  general ;  and,  therefore,  I  will  preserve  it  as  carefully  as  any  paper  in  my 
"  charter-chest.  1  shall  at  present  pass  over  in  silence  many  other  good  offices  you 
"  have  done  me ;  and  conclude  by  assuring  you,  that  as  you  think  it  an  honour  to 
"  be  descended  of  my  family,  so  I  think  it  happy  to  have  such  a  friend  as  you : 
"  You  shall  find  on  all  occasions  with  how  much  reality  I  am  your  most  atfec- 
"  tionate  friend  to  serve  you."     Sic  subscribitur  Marischal. 

Jnvenigie,  July  %tby  Directed  thus,  to  Mr  William  Wilson, 

1709.  one  of  the  Clerks  of  Session. 

It  is  commonly  thought,  that  about  the  beginning  of  King  Robert  the  Bruce's 
reign,  when  Gilbert  Hay  Earl  of  Errol  was  made  High  Constable  of  Scotland,  that 
Robert  de  Keith  was  made  Marischal  of  the  kingdom  by  that  gallant  prince,  who 
gave  the  same  office  heritably  to  himself  and  bis  successors:  Yet  I  find  by  the 
chartulary  of  Kelso,  that  Simon  Eraser  gives  the  kirk  of  Keith,  and  some  lands 
near  Haddington,  to  the  a'jbacy  of  Kelso,  which  is  confirmed  by  Hugh  Lorens, 
and  Eda  his  wife,  heiress  of  the  said  Simon,  and  Herveus  filius  Philippi  Marescalli 
also  confirms  the  same.  He  is  sometimes  designed  Herveus  de  Keith,  and  some- 
times Harveus  Marescallus.  And  John  de  Keith  Marescallus  filius  Hervei  Mares- 
calli, by  an  agreement  with  the  Abbot  of  Kelso,  confirms  in  his  favours  his  said 
father's  donation  of  the  kirk  of  Keith;  all  which  is  confirmed  by  King  Malcolm  IV. 
who  began  his  reign  in  the  year  1153,  which  is  a  clear  evidence  that  this  noble 
family  has  been  possessed  of  the  office  of  Great  Marischal  of  Scotland  long  before 
the  reign  of  King  Robert  the  Bruce. 

The  High  Manschals,  of  old,  carried  for  the  badge  of  this  office  an  axe;  Tillet 
says,  on  the  account  that  they  were  the  markers  out  of  camps,  and  broke  the 
ground  with  that  instrument,  as  1  before  mentioned.  But  others  say,  as  La  Lonet, 
in  his  Treatise  of  Nobihty,  lib.  1.  cap.  8.  that  the  marischals  carried  axes  as  the 
token  and  badge  of  power  and  royal  authority,  which,  of  old,  kings  themselves  did 
use  instead  of  a  sceptre,  as  a  mark  uf  their  dignity,  having  got  the  investiture  and 

Vol.  II.  3  A 


76  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

possession  of  their  kingdoms  by  the  tradition  of  an  axe.  But  the  Great  Marischals 
now,  instead  of  the  axe,  carry  battons  as  the  badge  of  this  high  office. 

Those  in  France  bear  behind  the  shield  of  their  arms,  as  symbols  of  this  office, 
two  battons  azure,  seme  of  flower-de-luces  or,  and  disposed  in  saltier,  as  says  Mon- 
sieur Baron  in  his  Art  of  Heraldry. 

The  Earl  Marshal  of  England  carries,  as  the  badge  of  his  high  office,  (as  narrated 
by  Sylvanus  Morgan  in  his  Sphere  of  Gentry,  lib.  4.  cap.  6.)  a  staff,  or  batton, 
erected  in  pale,  behind  the  middle  of  his  shield  of  arms.  And  the  said  author  tells 
us,  that  most  of  the  chief  officers  of  state  in  England  carry,  as  the  badge  of  their 
office,  a  staff  of  their  dignity,  or  rather  symbolum  administrationis.  For  which  he 
cites  Cassaneus  as  follows : 

Datur  igitur  virga  praetoribus,  propter  disciplinam. 

Datur  principibus,  propter  summam  regendi  potestatem. 

Datur  senioribus,  in  quibus  sapientije  munus  excellit. 

Datur  praesidibus,  ad  custodiam  obeundam. 

Datur  regibus,  ad  mansuetudinem.  &  clementiam  exercendam. 

Datur  imperatoribus,  ad  hostilem  impetum  coercendum  atque  injuriam  propulsandam". 

(CasSANEI  Sexta  Conclusion 

Such  is  the  dignity  of  the  staff,  that  at  the  coronation  of  the  Prince  of  Wales  it 
is  required,  and  at  the  words  virgae  aureae  traditionem,  the  king  delivereth  into  his 
hand  a  verge  of  gold,  betokening  government. 

With  us,  our  Earl  Marischal  bears  for  the  ensign  of  his  high  office,  as  matri- 
culated in  our  Lyon's  Register  of  Arms,  two  battons  of  the  Marischal  of  Scotland, 
being  gules,  seme  of  thistles,  ensigned  on  the  top  with  imperial  crowns  or,  and  dis- 
posed in  saltier  behind  the  escutcheoii  of  his  arms. 

Mr  Miege,  in  his  State  of  South  Britain,  tells  us,  "  That  the  last  great  officer 
"  there  is  the  Lord  High  Admiral,  who  has  the  management  of  all  marine  affairs, 
"  and  the  government  of  the  royal  navy,  with  power  of  decision  in  maritime 
"  cases,  both  civil  and  criminal.  He  judges  of  all  things  done  upon  or  beyond 
"  the  sea  in  any  part  of  the  world,  upon  the  sea-coasts,  in  all  ports  and  havens, 
"  and  upon  all  rivers  below  the  first  bridge  from  the  sea.  By  him  vice-admirals, 
"  rear-admirals,  and  all  sea-captains  are  commissionated,  all  deputies  for  particular 
"  coasts,  and  coroners  to  view  dead  bodies  found  on  the  sea-coasts,  or  at  sea.  He 
"  also  appoints  the  judges  for  his  Court  of  Admiralty,  and  may  imprison,  re- 
"  lease,  &.C." 

"  The  sea  being  reckoned  without  the  limits  of  the  common  law,  and  under 
"  the  jurisdiction  of  the  Lord  High  Admiral,  therefore  the  civil  law  is  made  use 
"  of  in  the  Court  of  Admiralty.  The  proceedings  in  all  civil  matters  are  accord- 
"  ing  to  the  civil  law,  that  is  by  libel  to  the  action,  both  parties  giving  surety 
"  that  they  shall  stand  to  the  judgment  of  the  court,  and  he  that  shall  fail  in  the 
"  suit  pay  to  the  other  what  he  shall  be  condemned  to.  But  in  criminal  matters, 
"  such  as  piracy  chiefly,  the  case  is  altered.  For  whereas  the  proceeding  in  tliis 
"  court  was,  of  old,  according  to  the  civil  law,  there  were  two  statutes  made  by 
"  Henry  VIIL  that  criminal  affairs  should  be  tried  in  this  court  by  witnesses  and 
"  a  jury,  and  this  by  special  commission  of  the  king  to  the  Lord  High  Admiral, 
"  whereof  some  of  the  judges  are  to  be  commissioners.  In  which  case  the  trial  is 
"  by  the  common  law,  as  directed  by  these  statutes. 

"  The  customs  and  former  decrees  of  this  court  are  there  of  force  for  deciding 
■'  of  controversies.  And  there  is  a  Court  of  Equity  under  it,  for  determining  dif- 
"  ferences  between  merchants.  Though  the  common  law  reaches  as  far  as  the 
"  low-water-mark,  being  counted  intra  corpus  comitatus  adjacentis,  and  causes 
"  thence  arising  are  determinable  by  common  law,  yet  when  the  sea  flows  over  the 
"  low-water-mark,  the  admiral  has  also  a  jurisdiction  there  over  matters  done 
"  (while  the  sea  flows)  between  the  low-water-mark  and  the  land. 

"  To  the  Lord  High  Admiral  belong  all  penalties  and  amercements  of  all  trans- 
"  gressors  at  sea,  on  the  sea-shore,  in  ports  and  havens,  and  all  rivers  below  the 
"  first  bridge  from  the  sea,  the  goods  of  pirates,  and  felons  condemned,  or  out- 
"  lawed,  sea-wrecks,  goods  floating  on  the   sea,  or  cast  away  on  the  shore,  not 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  77 

"  granted  to  the  lords  of  manors  adjoining  to  the  sea,  and  a  share  of  all  lawful 
"  prizes.  Also  all  great  fishes,  commonly  called  royal  Jisbes,  except  whales  and 
"  sturgeons.  To  which  add  a  salary  of  L.  7000  a-year.  In  short,  this  is  so  great 
"  an  office,  in  point  oi  trust,  honour,  and  profit,  that  it  has  usually  been  given  to 
"  princes  of  the  blood,  or  the  most  eminent  persons  among  the  nobility." 

The  same  author  tells  us,  in  his  State  of  North  Britain,  "  That  the  Scots  never 
"  abounded  in  naval  force,  nor  seem  to  have  affected  it ;  otherwise  a  nation  of  so  long 
"  standing,  having  such  materials  for  building  of  ships,  and  such  harbours  for  lay- 
"  ing  them  up  safe,  could  scarcely  have  been  without  a  competency  of  ships  of 
"  war.  This  must  be  in  part  ascribed  to  that  same  humour  which  made  them  n&- 
"  gleet  walled  towns,  according  to  that  of  our  historian  and  poet. 

Ilia  pharctratis  est  propria  gloria  Scotis,  &c. 

And  a  little  lower, 

Non  fossa  &  muris  pauiam,  sed  JVfarte  tueri. 

"  Another  reason  may  be,  that  their  wars  being  for  most  part  defensive,  and  by 
"  land,  against  the  several  people  who  inhabited  the  south  parts  of  the  island,  they 
"  did  not  much  apprehend  the  necessity  of  the  naval  force.  But  that  they  did 
"  not  altogether  neglect  it,  is  plain  from  their  acts  of  Parliament,  and  particularly 
"  the  140th  act  of  King  James  I.  by  which  it  is  ordained,  "  That  all  barons  and 
"  lords  having  lands  and  lordships  near  the  sea,  on  the  west  and  north  parts,  and 
"  especially  against  the  isles,  should  have  galleys,  and  maintain  them  according  to 
"  their  ancient  tenor;  and  all  the  lands  which  lie  within  six  miles  of  the  coast 
"  should  contribute  to  their  maintenance." 

"  With  these  galleys  they  defended  their  coasts,  and  sometimes  invaded  their 
"  enemies.  But  that  they  had  other  ships  of  war,  with  which  they  were  able  for- 
"  merly  to  look  the  English  and  others  in  the  face,  is  evident  from  history:  For 
"  in  the  reign  of  King  James  III.  a  squadron  of  the  English  navy,  which  infested 
"  our  coasts,  was  defeated  and  taken  by  Andrew  Wood  of  Largo,  a  noted  sea-cap- 
"  tain,  in  the  Frith  near  Dunbar;  and  he  afterwards  defeated  Sir  Stephen  Bull, 
"  with  another  English  squadron,  near  the  mouth  of  the  Tay,  where  he  took  him 
"  and  his  ships.  And  in  that  same  reign,  Andrew  Barton,  a  Scots  merchant,  having 
"  obtained  letters  of  marque  from  his  own  prince  to  make  war  with  the  Portu- 
"  guese,  who  had  killed  his  father,  and  taken  his  ship,  and  refused  to  make  satis- 
"  faction,  though  condemned  by  the  Admiralty  of  Flanders,  in  whose  dominions 
"  this  piracy  happened,  the  said  Barton  did  in  a  few  months  make  suflicient  re- 
"  prisals  upon  them  with  his  own  ships;  but  was  treacherously,  in  time  of  peace, 
"  surprised  at  the  instigation  of  the  Portuguese,  by  an  English  squadron,  under 
"  the  conduct  of  Admiral  Howard,  against  whom,  with  a  much  less  force,  he  main- 
"  tained  a  gallant  fight,  but  at  last  was  killed,  and  his  ships  taken." 

"  The  main  reason  why  the  Scots  neglected  improving  their  naval  force,  while 
"  their  neighbours  increased  and  augmented  theirs,  seems  to  have  been,  that  their 
"  princes,  when  neighbouring  nations  increased  their  naval  force,  were  either 
"  minors,  or  engaged  in  war  with  England,  or  intestine  broils  at  home;  as  hap- 
"  pened  in  the  reigns  of  King  James  III.  IV.  and  V.  Queen  Mary,  and  King 
"  James  VI.  during  whose  reign,  before  and  after  his  succession  to  the  crown  of 
"  England,  the  reasons  not  only  for  the  neglect,  but  for  the  decay  of  the  naval 
"  force  of  Scotland,  are  so  obvious,  that  it  is  needless  to  touch  them." 

The  chief  court  of  admiralty  in  Scotland  sits  in  Edinburgh,  where  they  deter- 
mine such  causes  of  piracy,  prizes,  £ic.  as  are  proper  to  their  cognizance.  The 
office  of  Lord  High  Admiral  in  Scotland  has,  for  the  most  part,  since  the  union  of 
the  crowns,  been  in  such  persons  as  had  not  their  residence  in  the  kingdom,  par- 
ticularly in  the  family  of  Lennox,  and  in  the  late  King  James  when  Duke  of 
York.  There  are  particular  jurisdictions  of  admiralty  hereditary  in  some  great 
families,  as  the  Duke  of  Argyle,  who  is  admiral  of  the  Western  Isles,  8ic.  And 
the  Eari  of  Sutherland,  of  the  County  of  Sutherland,  and  some  of  the  neighbour- 
ing provinces;  and  the  Earl  of  Morton  is  Steward,  Justiciary,  and  Admiral  of 


78  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

Orkney,  whose  deputies  are  at  his  own  nomination.  In  our  Court  of  Admiraltj 
we  have  a  judge,  two  procurators,  a  procurator-fiscal,  a  clerk  and  his  depute,  and 
three  niacers. 

Anciently  the  Romans  represented  their  offices  by  figures  on  their  medals  be- 
fore the  use  of  armories.  Pompey  had  on  some  of  his  medals  the  prow  of  a  ship 
when  admiral  in  the  wars  against  pirates.  And  Lucius  Hostilms,  admiral  in  the 
Punic  wars,  used  the  same  mark.  Juhus  Caesar,  upon  the  reverse  of  many  of  his 
medals,  had  the  augurial  staff,  the  axe,  and  the  fasces.  The  Septemviri,  whose 
ofKces  were  to  regulate  and  oversee  the  public  religious  festivals,  used  for  their 
marks  a  vessel  for  holding  wine.  And  the  Quindecemviri  had  a  dolphin  upon  a 
trident.  And  it  is  the  imitation  of  those  marks  of  dignity  on  medals  that  hath  oc- 
casioned the  usage  of  particular  badges  and  symbols  in  armories  as  distinguishing 
marks  borne  by  persons  in  high  offices. 

Admirals  have  been  in  use  many  generations  past,  almost  everywhere,  to  place 
an  anchor  pale -ways  behind  their  shields  as  the  badge  of  their  office.  The  General 
Admiral  of  the  Galleys  in  France,  according  to  Monsieur  Baron  in  his  Art  of  He- 
raldry, carries  a  double  anchor  erect  in  pale  behind  the  middle  of  the  escutcheon 
of  his  arms,  and  two  battons  seme  of  flower-de-luces  disposed  in  saltier  at  the  back 
of  the  shield.     As  in  the  arms  of  Mr  Le  Due  de  Vivonne,  General  des  Galrees. 

The  Lord  High  Admiral  of  England,  or  Dominus  supremus  prafectiis  classis  An- 
gUcanae,  according  to  Sylvanus  Morgan,  in  his  Sphere  of  Gentry,  llh.  4.  cap.  6. 
page  85.  bears  an  anchor  erect  in  pale  behind  the  middle  of  his  armorial  shield  as 
the  badge  of  his  high  office.  And  gives  us  an  example  thereof  in  the  arms  of 
James  Duke  of  Albany  and  York. 

In  Scotland  our  admirals  carried  the  same  symbol ;  for  though,  as  Sir  George 
Mackenzie  tells  us  in  his  Science  of  Heraldry,  page  3.  that  Wood  of  Largo  carries 
two  ships,  to  show  that  his  predecessors  were  Admirals  of  Scotland,  as  I  mentioned 
before,  yet  this  was  not  the  badge  of  that  office,  but  he  only  added  the  figures  of 
two  ships  under  sail  to  his  old  paternal  bearing,  the  oak  tree,  to  demonstrate  to 
posterity  that  he  was  once  an  admiral,  whereas  the  ensigns  of  high  offices  can  be 
borne  by  none  but  by  those  in  office,  neither  are  they  ordinarily  borne  within  but 
without  the  shield  as  exterior  ornaments  thereof.  1  have  seen  the  arms  of  James 
Earl  of  Bothwell,  (who  was  Lord  High  Admiral  of  Scotland  in  the  reign  of  Queen 
Mary)  both  on  his  seal  and  on  other  places,  particularly  on  the  roof  of  the  Hall  of 
Seaton,  called  Sampson's  Hall,  where  he  carries  an  anchor  erected  in  pale,  behind 
the  middle  of  the  shield  of  his  arms,  as  the  badge  of  his  office;  and  the  family  of 
Lennox  used  the  same  symbol  when  advanced  to  the  office  of  High  Admiral 

As  for  the  ancient  practice  of  placing  one  anchor  behind  armorial  bearings,  as 
the  badge  of  admiralty,  Menestrier,  in  his  Science  of  Heraldry,  tells  us.  That  he 
has  seen  in  a  manuscript  in  the  Bibliotbeque  of  the  Cardinal  Bouillon,  the  arms  of 
Lewis,  a  bastard  of  Bourbon,  Count  of  Rousillon  Admiral  of  France,  in  the  year 
1466,  being  azure,  seme  of  flower-de-luces  or,  a  batton  sinister  gules,  and  behind 
the  middle  of  the  shield  an  anchor  pale-ways  argent,  with  the  stock  or. 

But  now,  both  in  France  and  Britain,  the  High  Admirals  carry,  as  the  ensign  of 
their  high  office,  two  anchors  disposed  in  saltier  at  the  back  of  the  shield  of  their 
arms,  and  the  vice  or  rear  admirals  carry  but  one  m  pale  behind  their  shield. 
Monsieur  Baron,  in  his  Art  of  Heraldry,  gives  us  the  arms  of  Lewis  Alexander  de 
Bourbon,  a  natural  son  of  France,  Count  of  Toulouse,  Grand  Admiral,  &c.  being 
azure,  three  flower-de-luces  or,  a  batton  sinister  gules,  timbred  with  a  crown 
heightened  with  flov.'er-de-luces,  and  great  leaves  alternately,  within  a  manteau 
azure,  doubled  ermine,  and  behind  the  shield  two  anchors  saltier-ways. 

Olivarus  Uredus,  amongst  the  seals  of  the  Earls  of  Flanders,  gives  us  the  seal  of 
Albeit  Archduke  of  Austria,  who  married  Isabella  Infanta  Dutchess  of  Burgundy, 
and  Countess  of  Flanders,  daughter  of  Philip  II.  King  of  Spain,  where  both  their 
arms  are  marshalled  in  one  shield,  and  behind  the  same  are  two  anchors  placed 
saltier-ways,  which  seal  they  used  (says  our  author)  in  their  high  courts  of  ad- 
miralty. 

The  Masters  of  the  Cross-Bowers  in  France  were  in  use  to  place  cross-bows  at 
the  sides  of  their  escutcheons,  as  Menestrier  observes  in  his  Science  of  Heraldry, 
TjBho  tells  us,  that  he  has  seen  an..instance  of  it  in  the  year  1419.    And. the  Grand 


EXTERIOR  ORNARIENTS.  7y 

Masters  of  the  Artillery,  who  are  now  come  in  place  of  the  former,  carry  two 
cannons,  or  great  guns,  on  their  carriages,  adosse,  below  the  shield  of  arms,  with 
bullets  lying  beneath  them,  as  in  the  arms  of  Monsieur  Le  Due  du  Lude,  Grand 
Miiitre  d'Artillerie,  as  narrated  by  Monsieur  Baron  in  his  Art  of  Heraldry.  And 
the  arms  of  Lewis  de  Crevant  de  Humiers,  Marshal  of  France,  Marquis  of  Humiers, 
&-C.  Grand  Master  of  the  Artillery,  are  adorned  with  two  battons  gules,  seme  of 
tlower-de-luces  or,  disposed  in  saltier  behind  the  shield  as  his  badge  for  Marshal ; 
and  below,  as  being  also  Master  of  the  Artillery,  two  great  guns  mounted  on  three 
carriages  adosse,  as  aforesaid. 

These  figures  have  also  been  used  in  the  armorial  bearings  of  the  Great  Masters 
of  Artillery  in  Germany,  as  the  badge  of  that  office,  besides  ensigns  and  banners 
which  they  have  added  to  adorn  their  shields  of  arms,  on  another  account ;  ot 
which  Sylvester  Petra  Sancta  has  given  several  examples  in  his  Tessera:  Genti/itiie, 
as  that  of  Torquatus  de  comitibus,  whose  shield  of  arms  is  surrounded  with  eight 
ensigns,  and  six  standards  of  foot  and  horse,  marked  with  the  arms  of  those  trom 
whom  he  had  taken  them  in  battle  ;  and  below  the  shield  two  brass  guns  or  can- 
nons on  their  carriages  addossc  firing.  Our  author's  words  are,  "  Ad  hsec  Torqua- 
"  tus  de  comitibus  Dux  Belli  inclitus  ac  strenuus  a  Ferdinando  II.  cui  diu  milita- 
"  vit,  in  nuperis  simultatibus  imperii,  tesserae  su;e  permeruit,  propter  signa  equitum 
"  ac  peditum,  qua  indeptus  est  fortissime  dimicando,  etiam  aenea  bellica  tonnenta, 
"  functus  videlicet  prasfectura  rei  tormentarite  &-  donatus  etiam  a  Cajsare  ideo  tor- 
"  mentis  duobus :  Quje  ille  jussit  deportari  in  Italiam,  gloris  monumentum."  And 
in  the  same  chapter  he  gives  the  arms  of  the  family  Bonefaceorum  in  Spain, 
adorned  with  twelve  ensigns,  and  below  the  shield  four  anchors,  to  perpetuate  the 
memory  of  some  notable  victory  by  sea  and  land  obtained  by  one  of  this  family  as 
High  Admiral. 

It  is  to  be  observed,  that  badges  of  offices  which  adorn  the  outsides  of  the  shield 
of  arms,  show  only  that  the  bearers  are  in  possession  of  such  offices  ;  and  their 
issue  outed  of  them  cannot  use  them  so,  (except  by  a  special  warrant  for  that  end) 
but  may  be  allowed  to  use  them  within  the  shield  as  an  armorial  figure,  to  inti- 
mate to  posterity  that  their  progenitors  have  once  been  honoured  by  such  offices, 
as  I  took  notice  of  before,  in  an  example  hereof,  in  the  arms  of  Wood  of  Largo. 
Yet  the  adorning  crests  and  sides  of  armorial  shields  with  ensigns,  banners,  and 
pennons,  has  been  a  practice  continued  hereditary  in  several  families  in  France, 
Germany,  and  Italy,  from  the  first  assumer  of  them,  and  that  upon  several  ac- 
counts, as  trophies  of  valoui-  and  victory  over  their  enemies,  whose  ensigns  they 
place  round  their  shields  ;  and  being  so  adorned,  they  are  transmitted  to  their 
issue,  representers  of  their  famihes,  of  which  the  said  Sylvester  Petra  Sancta  gives 
us  several  examples,  in  his  77th  chapter,  de  explicatis  ciica  tesseras  gentilitias  vex- 
illis,  amongst  which  is  the  shield  of  arms  of  the  family  of  Colonni  in  Rome, 
adorned  with  eight  ensigns  of  the  Turks,  marked  with  crescents,  since  Marcus 
Antonius  of  that  family  defeat  the  Turkish  fleet,  who  designed  to  invade  Europe, 
and  below  the  shield  are  placed  two  Turks  in  chains,  to  perpetuate  this  notable 
victory.  This  family,  besides  these  eight  Turkish  ensigns,  have  above  them  two 
great  banners,  marked  with  the  arms  of  the  pope  and  ot  the  empire,  as  constables 
of  the  church  and  empire.  And  Menestrier  in  his  Science  of  Heraldry,  tells  us. 
That  banners  adorning  arms  are  in  some  countries  badges  of  constables,  as  with 
the  same  family  of  Colonni  in  Italy,  and  with  the  chief  house  of  Clermont  in 
Dauphine,  who  outwardly  adorn  their  shields  with  banners  seme  of  dolphins  as 
heritable  Constables  of  Dauphine.  . 

Those  whose  office  it  was  to  carry  the  banner  of  their  countries,  have  been  in 
use  to  place  such  at  the  sides  of  their  shields  of  arms,  as  the  Casarinv  in  Rome 
carry  four  banners  or  ensigns  purple  displayed,  issuing  from  each  side  of  the  shield, 
marked  with  the  letters  S.  P.  ^  R.  on  account,  says  Sylvester  Petra  Sancta,  they 
were  Vexilli  feri,  Senatus  Populi  ^le  Romani.  And  the  Counts  de  Vexin,  who 
carried  the  oriflam  of  France,  have  two  banners  carried  by  the  supporters  of  their 
arms,  being  lions,  as  Menestrier  has  observed ;  as  likewise  the  royal  supporters  of 
France,  being  two  angels,  holding  in  each  of  their  hands  a  banner  erect  in  pale. 
And  Sir  George  Mackenzie,  in  his  Science  of  Heraldry,  page  95,  has  given  us  the 
figure  of  the  seal  of  James  Lord  Hamilton.     And  it  is  presumeable,  by  the  posi- 

Vol.  II.  3  B 


8o  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

tion  of  the  shield  thereon,  that  he  was  the  first  lord  of  that  name,  and  married  King 
James  II. 's  daughter.  The  blaion  or  description  of  which  seal  that  learned  author 
having  omitted,  1  here  insert  as  follows.  This  noble  Lord  bears  on  a  shield  couche 
three  cinquefoils,  above  the  same  is  placed  a  helmet,  at  the  back  whereof  issues 
a  running  leaf  or,  two  by  way  of  mantling,  and  on  the  top  thereof  is  set  his  torce  or 
wreath,  whereout  issues  his  crest,  being  an  antelope's  head  and  neck,  supported  by  two 
antelopes,  with  one  foot  standing  on  a  terrace,  with  their  tails  betwixt  their  hinder 
feet ;  one  of  which  feet  stands  also  on  a  terrace,  and  with  the  other  feet  they  support 
the  shield ;  with  one  of  their  fore  feet  they  lay  hold  of  the  helmet,  and  with  the 
other  each  of  them  embraces  and  bears  up  a  banner  erect  in  pale,  and  round  the 
seal  is  this  legend,  Sigillum  Jacobi  Domin.  de  Hamylton.  Again  the  said  judicious 
author,  page  last,  in  his  blazon  of  the  achievement  of  his  Majesty  of  Great  Britain, 
tells  us,  that  his  supporter  of  the  unicorn  on  the  dexter  embraces  and  bears  up  a 
banner  azure,  charged  with  a  St  Andrew's  cross  urgent,  and  the  hon  on  the  sinister, 
and  another  banner  argent,  charged  with  a  plain  cross,  (called  of  St  George)  gules. 
And  before  the  succession  of  King  James  VI.  to  the  crown  of  England,  1  find  by 
old  books  of  blazons  and  paintings,  that  the  supporters  of  Scotland,  being  two  uni- 
corns, that  one  on  the  dexter  did  embrace  and  bear  up  a  banner  charged  with  the 
royal  arms  of  Scotland,  and  that  on  the  sinister  with  the  said  St  Andrew's  cross. 
By  which  examples  it  is  evident,  that  this  practice  of  supporters  bearing  up  ban- 
ners is  pretty  ancient  with  us.  But  it  is  to  be  observed  by  these  last  instances, 
that  the  staffs  of  these  banners  are  not  placed  saltier-ways  behind  the  shield,  as  the 
usage  is  with  the  Italians,  Spaniards,  and  Germans.  Which  method  of  trimming 
and  adorning  their  armorial  shields,  though  proper  to  them,  yet  is  not  so  usual 
with  the  French  and  us,  who  commonly  carry  no  more  than  two  banners  when 
they  adorn  their  arms  with  these  badges  or  symbols,  and  "oesides  are  always 
erected  in  pale  at  the  sides  of  the  shield,  and  the  ensigns  are  displayed  on  the  flags 
thereof 

Some  also,  on  account  of  military  employments,  have  placed  ensigns  round  the 
shield  of  their  armorial  bearings,  as  Ferdinand  de  Alerson,  General  of  the  Spanish 
army  under  King  Charles  V.  of  Spain,  was  the  first  (says  Menestrier,  in  his 
Science  of  Heraldry)  that  placed  such  symbols  about  the  amis  of  his  family.  And 
the  family  of  Andredas  there  has  eighteen  banners  round  the  shield  of  their  arms, 
disposed  in  saltier.  And  the  Dukes  de  Alva  carry  ten  with  us  upon  the  same  ac- 
count. John  Scott  of  Thirlestane,  who  came  to  King  James  Vs.  army  at  Soutra- 
edge,  with  three  score  ten  spearmen  on  horseback,  of  his  friends  and  followers,  be- 
ing likewise  willing  to  go  with  the  said  king  into  England,  when  his  nobles  and 
others  refused  already  to  stake  all  for  his  service  ;  the  king,  as  a  reward  for  his 
loyalty,  allowed  him  adorning  his  armorial  shield,  to  take,  for  crest,  a  mural  crown 
with  six  spears,  which  I  should  have  observed  before  when  treating  on  crowns ;  as 
also  to  use,  for  supporters,  two  men  in  coats  of  mail  with  steel  caps,  holding  each 
in  their  hands  a  spear  with  pennons,  having  small  flags  or  banners  thereat.  And 
Alexander  Leslie,  who  came  to  great  honour  in  the  wars  abroad  under  Gustavus 
Adolphus  King  of  Sweden,  whom  he  served  in  the  quality  of  a  field  marshal,  af- 
ter his  return  home,  was  advanced  to  be  general  and  chief  commander  of  the  Par- 
liament's army,  and  created  Earl  of  Leven  by  King  Charles  I.  who,  in  considera- 
tion of  his  military  bravery,  allowed  him  to  take,  for  supporters,  two  warriors  in 
armour,  holding  in  each  of  their  hands  a  banner. 

Yet  the  Germans,  I  observe,  have  more  commonly  these  banners  and  ensigns 
issuing  from  the  tops  of  their  shields,  and  very  often  from  their  helmets  and  crests. 
As  the  princes  of  Anhalt  have  twelve  banners,  so  displayed,  issuing  from  their 
crests,  the  Counts  of  Mansfelt  six  banners,  and  the  Counts  of  Solms  two,  having 
the  arms  of  their  noble  feus  displayed  upon  them. 

Menestrier  says,  in  his  said  Science  of  Heraldry,  that  the  practice  of  adorning  shields 
of  arms  after  this  method  in  Flanders  is  very  ancient.  And  in  France  several  old 
families  have  used  banners  at  the  sides  of  their  arms  in  place  of  supporters,  on  ac- 
count that  they  had  right  to  carry  a  banner  in  the  field.  And  the  Ricosombres  in 
Spain  are  dignified  by  the  formality  of  the  delivery  of  a  banner  and  kettle,  being  al- 
most the  same  with  knight  bannerets,  who  were  also  made  by  the  display  of  banners. 
As  our  lord  barons  and  other  higher  degrees  of  nobility,  who  have  all  right  to  rear 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  8r 

up  a  banner  in  the  field.  And,  in  my  opinion,  may  likewise  adoin  their  arms 
with  ensigns  and  banners.  But  this  practice,  as  it  was  not  so  frequent  in  France 
as  in  other  kingdoms,  yet  it  was  less  n\  use  with  the  English  and  us,  who  both  had 
from  France  the  science  and  prac?tice  of  heraldry.  And  yet  some  old  families  here 
in  Scotland,  who  had  right  to  usi  supporters,  have  made  them  to  carry  both  en- 
signs and  banners,  as  in  the  •.■xample  of  the  Lord  Hamilton  foresaid. 

Having  treated  thus  far  of  the  ensigns,  badges,  and  symbols  of  civil  and  military 
offices,  according  to  the  method  and  usage  I  have  met  with  them  in  armories,  and 
of  their  different  situations  and  positions  in  adorning  outwardly  escutcheons  of  arms  ; 
there  are  others  which  some  call  politic  marks  of  dignity  and  chivalry.  The  first 
are  these  used  by  the  electors  of  the  empire,  who  use  the  several  figures  of  the  im- 
perial regalia,  which  they  place  in  quarters  of  their  armorial  achievements,  to 
show  their  dignified  offices  in  the  empire.  As  for  example,  the  House  of  Bavaria 
carry  the  imperial  globe,  that  of  Saxony  the  sword  of  honour,  Brandenburg  the 
sceptre,  the  House  of  Palatine  the  imperial  crown,  and  the  family  of  Hanover  the 
crown  of  Charlemagne,  being  the  proper  badge  made  use  of  by  that  serene  house 
in  their  shield  of  arms,  as  hereditary  treasurer  of  the  sacred  Roman  Empire  ;  and, 
being  all  figures  of  the  regalia,  they  are  in  use  to  carry  them  before  the  emperor 
by  virtue  of  their  high  olfices,  as  Beckinanus  says.  Dissert.  8.  caj).  5.  "  Insignibus 
"  suis  seculares  clinodium  istud  inserunt  cui  ratione  officii  portando  destinati  sunt." 
And  in  other  kingdoms,  in  imitation  hereof,  the  King  of  Bohemia,  as  principal 
cup-bearer  to  the  emperor,  charged  the  breast  of  the  lion  m  his  arms  with  a  cup  ; 
and  the  badge  of  the  carpenters'  axes  make  up  the  arms  of  the  family  of  Amberville 
in  France,  from  their  predecessors  being  anciently  honoured  with  the  office  of  the 
king's  carpenter.  The  badge  of  cups  have  been  made  use  of  by  an  ancient  family 
of  the  name  of  Butler  in  England,  and  by  the  ancient  house  of  Shaw  of  Sauchie 
in  Scotland,  the  predecessors  of  both  which  families  being  of  old  the  king's  butlers 
in  both  kingdoms,  and,  as  the  particular  symbol  of  that  office,  carried  the  said  fi- 
gures, though  now  they  are  become  the  only  figures  that  make  up  the  arms  pecu- 
liar to  both  these  surnames  in  Britian.  As  also,  I  find  by  old  manuscripts  of  bla- 
zons, that  the  family  of  Carnegie  of  old,  now  Earls  of  Southlsk.,  have  been  in 
use  to  charge  the  breast  of  the  blue  eagle  they  bear  in  their  arms  with  a  cup  of 
gold,  as  being  anciently  cup-bearers  to  our  kings.  And  Sir  George  Mackenzie, 
in  his  Science  of  Heraldry,  p.  3.  tells  us,  that  King  Robert  the  Bruce  having  car- 
ried, as  a  private  badge,  three  laurel  leaves,  with  this  word,  Hub  sole,  sub  umbra 
virens,  he  gave  to  Irvine  of  Drum's  predecessor,  who  had  been  constantly  his 
armour-bearer,  the  three  holly  leaves,  which  is  a  kind  of  laurel,  and  is  at  present 
the  armorial  bearing  of  that  ancient  tamily.  But  these  badges  of  dignrfied  offices, 
being  figures  that  make  up  their  several  arms  within  the  shield,  and  no  exterior 
ornament  thereof,  which  is  the  subject  I  am  now  treating  on,  I  shall  not  insist  to 
make  farther  observations  upon  them. 

I  proceed  next  to  treat  on  the  politic  marks  of  chivalry,  being  the  collars  and 
badges  belonging  to  knights  of  sovereign  and  high  orders.  It  was  a  constant  max- 
im in  all  well  regulated  governments  to  give  a  just  encouragement  to  merit,  and 
that  by  proportioning  rewards  to  the  service  done.  For  merit  must  be  supposed  to 
consist  in  the  performance  of  some  virtuous  or  heroic  actions  directed  for  the  pub- 
lic good  :  And  as  virtue  is  either  military  or  civil,  so  the  distribution  of  the  rewards 
is  different,  either  by  bestowing  degrees  and  titles  of  honour,  or  by  donations  of 
wealth,  so  that,  in  either  construction,  virtue  may  have  its  proper  and  suitable  re- 
ward. But  the  proper  reward  of  military  virtue,  is  honour,  (to  which  distinct  head 
I  am  now  confined)  which  Aristotle  calls  the  greatest  of  exterior  goods  :  And  being 
an  object  of  a  nobler  ambition  than  the  accumulation  of  wealth,  is  principally  the 
aim  of  that  virtue  we  understand  by  valour,  which  springs  from  more  generous 
spirits,  and  hath  been  the  constant  foundation  of  raising  men  to  the  highest  emi- 
nence of  glory,  and  superior  dignity. 

But  that  fame  might  not  lose  itself  in  an  unbounded  notion,  it  was  at  length 
thought  fit  to  reduce  honour  into  form  and  order,  by  investing  the  person  meriting 
with  some  particular  title  or  appellation  of  excellence,  (the  original  of  all  nobility) 
of  which  knighthood,  as  it  hath  been  accounted  the  most  suitable  reward  to  the  great- 
est virtue,  so  it  hath  been   esteemed  the  chief  and  primary  honour  among  many 


82  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

nations.  The  Romans  held  honour  and  virtue  in  that  esteem,  that  they  deified  and 
dedicated  temples  to  them  :  They  made  them  so  contiguous  in  their  situation,  that 
there  was  no  other  passage  to  that  of  Honour,  but  through  the  Temple  of  Virtue, 
mystically  admonishing,  that  honour  was  not  to  be  attained  by  any  other  way. 
In  several  Roman  coins  we  see  honour  and  virtue  represented  together  in  one  re- 
verse ;  and  in  one  medal  the  face  of  honour  so  shadows  that  of  virtue,  that  but  a 
little  ot  It  appears,  honour  being  the  more  illustrious  of  the  two  ;  and  where  we 
behold  any  person  outwardly  adorned  with  it,  we  are  to  judge  hun  inwardly  endu- 
ed with  virtue. 

In  tracing  the  original  of  knighthood,  we  are  not  so  vain  as  to  say  with  the 
French,  that  St  Michael  was  the  premier  chevalier ;  yet  this  much  we  may  assert. 
That  it  is  as  ancient  as  valour  and  heroic  virtue,  notwithstanding  the  ceremonies 
and  circumstances  of  it  have  varied,  according  to  several  ages  and  nations:  And, 
therefore,  with  much  probability,  we  may  derive  the  original  of  military  honour 
trom  the  Trojans  and  Greeks  ;  among  whom,  as  knights  of  great  renown,  were 
Hector,  Troilus,  ^neas,  Agamemnon,  &-c.  But,  upon  a  more  substantial  basis, 
we  shall  descend  to  the  Romans  ;  among  whom,  in  the  very  infancy  of  their  mili- 
tar  glory,  a  society  of  knights  was  instituted,  immediately  after  their  union  with 
the  Sabines.  Romulus  inrolled  three  centuries  of  knights  out  of  the  chiefest  fa- 
milies, whom  he  appointed  to  be  his  life-guard,  and  called  them  celeres,  from  their 
activity  and  dispatch  in  martial  affairs. 

Tarquinius  Priscus  made  an  addition  to  these  centuries ;  the  like  did  Servius 
Tullius,  who  ordained,  that  those  who  should  succeed  in  that  body  should  be 
elected  ex  censu,  viz.  from  a  considerable  and  certain  valuation  of  their  estates, 
who  had  the  greatest  cense,  and  were  of  the  most  noble  families,  says  Dionys. 
Halicarn.  And  soon  after  the  equestrian  class  began  to  be  formed  and  constituted 
one  of  the  three  orders  of  the  commonwealth,  which  were  ranked,  according  to 
Livy,  Senatus,  Ordo  Kquejlris,  et  Plebs  ;  and,  forasmuch  as  this  degree  is  placed  be- 
tween the  patricians  or  senators,  and  the  plebeians,  it  answers  exactly  to  the  state 
of  our  knights  between  the  nobility  and  commonalty  :  And  from  this  order  to 
the  height  of  nobility,  which  resided  in  the  senators,  was  the  way  prepared;  Ju- 
nius Brutus  being  the  first  who  was  raised  to  a  senator  from  the  equestrian  order. 

It  was  a  constitution  as  old  as  Tiberius's  reign,  that  none  should  be  admitted  in- 
to  that  order  unless  free-born,  or  a  gentleman  for  three  generations;  and  indeed 
for  a  long  time  none  were  elected  knights  but  the  best  sort  of  gentlemen,  and 
persons  of  extraction,  as  was  the  illustrious  Ma:cenas. 

Atavis  rcgibus  ortus  eques.  Mart. 

Yet,  at  length,  through  corruption  of  times,  plebeians  and  freed  men  being  too 
frequently  received  into  this  degree,  occasioned  their  esteem  and  authority  to  grow 
less  and  less,  till  it  shrunk  to  nothing.  And  when  Cicero  was  consul,  amio  ah  urbe 
condita  690,  the  equestrian  order  stood  in  need  of  re-establishment,  whereupon  they 
were  then  incorporated  into  that  commonwealth  in  the  third  degree,  all  acts  pas- 
sing in  the  name  of  the  senate,  the  people  of  Rome,  and  the  equestrian  order.  Asa 
mark  of  eminence,  they  l?ad  the  titles  oi  splendidi  and  illustres  bestowed  upon  them, 
and  sometimes  they  have  been  called  most  sacred  knights.  And  besides  other  pri- 
vileges they  had  seats  with  the  senators  in  the  Circus  Maximus ;  and,  by  the 
Roscian  law,  sat  next  them  in  the  theatres  ;  they  had  likewise  a  college  called 
CoUegium  Equitum ;  and  temples  were  dedicated  to  the  goddess  Fortune,  under  the 
title  of  Equestri  Fortuna.  They  were  allowed  to  wear  rings  to  distinguish  them. 
The  which  honour  continued  hereditary  in  their  families,  which  does  not  with  our 
knights. 

The  ancientest  real  knights,  it  is  most  likely,  were  made  by  the  first  Christian 
kings,  who  appointed  many  religious  ceremonies  to  be  observed  at  the  creation  of 
such,  and  none  were  admitted  to  that  honour,  but  those  who  had  merited  it  by 
some  extraordinary  commendable  exploits.  We  shall  now  touch  upon  the  degrees 
of  knighthood,  which  have  been  personal,  and  may  be  comprehended  under  the 
modern  title  of  Equites  Aurati,  or  Milites  Simpliccs,  (as  distinguished  from  the  se- 
veral orders  of  chivalry,  instituted  in  Christendom.)     In  the  circumstance  of  whose 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  83 

creation,  we  confess  nothing  in  the  Roman  ordo  equestris  hath  place,  though  that 
might  be  the  ground  and  original  of  the  dignity,  and  one  common  end  in  both, 
namely,  the  pursuit  of  military  exploits  and  service  in  the  wars. 

Knights  in  Latin  are  called  mUitfs  or  t-qtiites,  because  the  design  was,  that  none 
but  soldiers  should  enjcy  that  dignity.  The  French  distinguish  a  knight  by  the 
n^me.  oi  chevalier,  the  Spaniards  by  that  of  faxv^/^rs,  ai>d  the  Italians  by  that  of 
cavagliera,  the  Germans  call  a  knight  ritUr  ;  all  of  them  imparting  no  more  than 
one  that  serves  on  horseback.  The  English  title  Knight  is  derived  from  the  Saxon 
cnikt,  which,  in  that  language,  is  no  more  than  a  servant,  and,  in  all  probability, 
proceeded  in  serving  the  king  in  his  wars. 

Of  the  degrees  of  knighthood.  First,  That  of  the  monozoHS,  i.  e.  knight  begirt 
with  the  military  girdle,  a  custom  devolved  to  the  Germans  and  Gauls  from  an- 
cient times :  nor  do  we  find,  among  the  various  ceremonies  of  knighthood,  any 
that  hath  continued  so  constant  in  practice,  as  the  endowing  with  girdle  and  sword, 
marks  of  honour  and  virtue,  with  which  the  statues  and  portraitures  of  knights 
on  their  grave-stones  have  been  adorned.  For,  as  at  this  day,  knights  are  stiled 
equites  aurati,  from  the  golden  spurs  heretofore  put  on  at  then-  creation ;  so 
were  they  more  anciently  cingulo  militari  donati,  in  respect,  that  when  one  was 
knighted,  he  was  not  only  struck  with  the  sword,  but  invested  with  sword  and 
belt. 

adly.  The  Baccalaurei  or  Knights-batchelors  are  to  be  considered,  who  are  in- 
diflerently  stiled  chevaliers,  milites,  equites  aurati,  and  knights.  This  degree  is  truly 
accounted  the  first  of  all  military  dignity,  and  the  foundation  of  all  honours  in  our 
nation,  and  is  derived  from,  if  not  the  same  with,  that  immediately  preceding. 
For  as  the  ceremony  of  a  gentle  touch  on  the  shoulder  with  the  flat  side  of  the 
sword  hath  been  since  used  instead  of  girding  with  the  sword  and  belt,  (especially 
in  times  of  war,  or  in  haste)  as  an  initiation  into  the  military  order,  so,  on  the 
contrary,  it  is  not  unusual,  now-a-days,  for  the  prince,  at  least,  gladio,  if  not  cingulo 
donare ;  for  he  oftentimes  bestows  the  sword  upon  the  person  he  knighteth. 

The  third  sort,  wtte:  Knights-bannerets,  whoso  well  deserved  in  the  wars,  that  they 
were  afterwards  permitted  to  use  vexillum  quadratum,  a  square  banner,  whence 
they  were  called  equites  vexillarii,  or  chevaliers  a  banniire,  from  the  Dutch  baner- 
heere,  lord  or  master  of  the  banner.  Camden  conceives  this  title  first  devised  by 
King  Edward  III.  in  recompense  of  martial  prowess ;  a  recital  of  which  dignity 
is  mentioned  in  a  patent,  20th  Edward  III.  to  John  Copland,  for  his  service  in 
taking  David  King  of  Scots,  prisoner.  But  it  was  much  more  ancient  in  Britain, 
as  well  as  in  France ;  and  they  had  particular  robes  and  other  ornaments  given  them 
trom  the  crown.  And  there  is  an  evidence  of  a  writ  in  the  said  King  Edward  III. 
his  time  for  furnishing  Thomas  Bardolf  with  the  robes  of  a  banneret.  This  digni- 
ty is  placed  in  the  middle  between  the  barons  and  other  knights,  in  which  respect, 
the  banneret  may  be  called  vexillarius  minor,  as  if  he  were  the  lesser  banner-bearer  ; 
to  the  end  he  may  be  so  differenced  from  the  greater,  namely,  the  baron;  to  whom 
the  right  of  bearing  a  square  banner  doth  also  belong. 

Other  authors  tell  us,  this  order  of  knighthood  was  instituted  in  England  in  the 
time  of  King  Edward  I.  And  it  is  most  likely  that  the  Normans  were  acquainted 
with  this  order  long  before  :  But  I  find,  by  our  historians,  this  order  to  have  been 
of  older  standing  with  us  ;  for  Sir  Alexander  Carron,  Banneret,  is  said  by  them 
to  have  carried  the  banner  of  Scotland  before  King  Alexander  I.  (who  began  his 
reign  in  the  year  1 107)  in  his  expedition  against  the  rebels  in  Mearns  and  Mur- 
ray ;  where,  by  the  said  Sir  Alexander's  conduct  and  valour,  who,  in  the  king's 
presence,  with  a  crooked  sword,  fought  valiantly,  and  killed  many  of  the  rebels, 
that  king  obtained  a  notable  victory  over  them  ;  for  which  heroic  actions  he  got 
many  lands,  and  his  name  was  changed  from  Carron  to  Scrymgeour,  which  signi- 
fies a  hardy-fighter  ;  and  his  posterity  being  long  afterwards  standard-bearers  to  our 
kings  and'constables  of  Dundee,  got,  for  arms,  a  rampant  lion  holding  a  crooked 
sword.  And  Bannerman  of  Elsick,  an  older  family  than  that  of  Scrymgeour,  be- 
ing also  baimerets,  carried  anciently  for  an  armorial  figure,  a  banner  displayed,  as 
relative  to  the  name,  which  was  from  their  office  as  hereditary  banner-bearers  to 
our  kings,  before  the  reigns  of  King  Malcolm  III.  And  Sir  George  Mackenzie, 
in  his  Manuscript   Genealogy  of  the  Families  of  Scotland,  (agreeing  also  with  our 

Vol.  II.  3  C 


b4  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

historians)  tells  us,  tbat  the  said  King  Malcolm  III.  who  began  his  reign  in  the 
year  1057,  hearing  ot  a  new  rebellion  begun  in  the  north  parts  of  the  kingdom, 
went  with  his  army  to  the  Water  of  Spey  to  fight  against  them,  where,  perceiving 
his  standard-bearer,  Bunnerman,  to  shrink,  and  not  to  show  a  chearful  countenance, 
he  pulled  the  banner  trom  him,  and  at  the  same  time  having  observed  the  manly 
courage  of  Sir  Alexander  Carron,  (father  of  the  above  Sir  Alexander)  who  ac- 
companied him  in  this  expedition,  he  gave  the  royal  banner  to  him,  and,  after  the 
battle,  striking  him  with  his  sword,  created  him  a  knight-banneret ;  he  there  be- 
having himself  to  the  great  satisfaction  of  that  king  ;  for  which  good  service  he 
also  created  him  and  his  posterity  heritable  standard-bearers  to  the  kings  of  Scot- 
land ;  and  with  this  new  office  many  fair  lands  were  bestowed  on  him. 

This  order  is  certainly  most  honourable,  because  never  conferred  but  upon  some 
heroic  action  performed  in  the  field,  whereas  all  other  orders  are  bestowed  from 
favour  or  meaner  motives;  for  the  banneret  is  never  created,  unless  at  a  time  when 
the  king's  standard  is  erected.  In  France  they  are  said  to  have  transmitted  the 
degree  to  posterity,  but  in  England  and  Scotland  it  dies  with  the  person  that  ob- 
tained it.  Bertrand  de  Guesclin,  Constable  of  France,  after  the  defeat  he  gave  the 
English  at  Cockerel,  where  he  took  their  General,  Sir  John  Chandos,  made  knights 
bannerets,  MeJJire  Jacques  le  Mercier,  Lord  of  St  ^intin  des  Isles,  and  the  son-in-law 
of  the  same  Mercier,  called  Bertauld  de  Gastel,  Lord  of  Vitray  le  Gastel.  And  Sir 
John  Smith  was  made  one  alter  Edgehill  fight,  for  rescuing  the  standard  of 
King  Charles  I.  from  the  rebels.  The  Scots  (says  an  Enghsh  author)  are  supposed 
to  call  such  a  knight  a  bannerent,  from  the  rending  of  his  banner.  But  now  these 
honours  of  the  field  have  been  of  long  time  laid  aside.  As  for  the  ceremony  of 
their  creation,  I  refer  to  Mr  Segar. 

The  badges  and  ensigns  of  knighthood  among  the  Romans  were  a  ring ;  and  in 
Genesis  we  read  of  Pharaoh's  taking  off  his  ring,  and  putting  it  upon  Joseph's 
hand.  Among  the  Germans  the  shield  and  lance  were  accounted  the  grand 
badges  of  mihtary  honour  or  knighthood.  Much  hke  the  ancient  Germans  was 
the  custom  of  making  knights  among  the  Irish.  And  Favin  observes,  that  the 
shield  and  lance  were  the  proper  arms  appertaining  to  French  knights,  which 
esquires,  armigers,  carried  always  after  their  masters.  Another  ensign  of  knightly 
honour  is  the  cingulum  militare,  or  balteus,  which  Varro  says,  is  Tuscan,  signifying 
a  military  girdle,  which  was  garnished  with  great  buckles,  studs,  and  rings  of 
pure  gold,  to  show  their  dignity  and  power  in  military  commands.  Our  knights 
were  no  less.anciently  known  by  these  belts  than  by  their  gilt  swords,  spurs,  &-c. 
Howbeit,  the  use  now  only  appears  in  knights  of  the  bath.  To  the  belt  was  also 
added  a  sword,  not  of  ordinary  use  ;  and  therefore  termed  the  sword  of  a  knight. 
Another  eminent  badge  is  the  golden  spurs,  wherewith,  at  the  time  of  their  crea- 
tion, knights  were  wont  to  be  adorned  ;  and,  to  these,  a  little  after  the  conquest, 
were  added  far  more  and  greater  ornaments.  And  several  families,  by  the  name 
of  knight,  bear  for  their  arms  the  spurs  on  a  canton.  In  the  last  place,  is  the  col- 
lar, an  ensign  of  knightly  dignity  among  the  Germans,  Gauls,  Britons,  Danes,  and 
Goths,  among  whom  it  was  customary  to  wear  them,  denoting  such  as  were  re- 
markable for  their  valour.  But,  in  later  times,  it  was  the  peculiar  fashion  of  knights 
among  us  to  wear  golden  collars,  composed  of  S.  S.  or  other  various  devices;  and 
such  is  the  honour  of  knighthood,  that  several  kings  of  France,  England,  &c.  received 
this  dignity  at  the  time  they  enjoyed  their  other  titles.  And  though  it  i*  said  the 
sons  of  the  French  king  are  knights  as  soon  as  they  receive  baptism,  yet  are  they 
not  judged  worthy  of  the  kingdom,  unless  first  solemnly  created  ;  and  we  else- 
where find  that  the  royal  heirs  of  Arragon  were  suspended  from  that  crown  until 
they  had  received  the  honour  of  knighthood.  And,  after  the  Norman  conquest, 
the  young  princes  of  England  were  sent  over  to  the  neighbouring  kings  to  receive 
this  honour.  Thus  King  Henry  II.  of  England  was  sent  to  our  King  David,  and 
knighted  by  him  in  Carlisle ;  and  Edward  I.  of  England,  at  the  age  of  fifteen 
years,  was  sent  to  Alphonsus  XI.  King  of  Castile,  for  the  same  dignity.  In  hke 
manner,  Malcolm  King  of  Scotland  and  Alexander,  son  of  Wilham,  King  thereof, 
were  knighted  by  John  King  of  England,  anno  1211.  And  our  King  Alexander  III. 
by  King  Henry  III.  of  England,  a/ino  1252.     And  Magnus,  King  of  the  Isle  of 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  85 

Man,  by  the  same  king.     All  which  sulliciently  demonstrate  the  honour  and  esteem 
which  was  ever  had  for  that  order. 

As  to  the  collars  and  badges  belonging  to  knights  of  sovereign  and  high  orders, 
being  also  figures  used  in  adorning  armorial  shields,  my  reader  is  not  liere  to  ex- 
pect a  particular  enumeration  and  description  of  these  many  and  dilVerent  orders 
in  Europe,  their  first  rise,  what  aie  secular,  and  u  hat  religious,  which  would  be  a 
subject  too  long  here  to  narrate  ;  but  1  refer  my  readers  to  the  respective  authors 
on  that  subject  in  the  several  kingdoms,  and,  particularly,  to  William  Segar  Nor- 
roy  King  at  Arms,  his  book,  intitled.  Honour,  Mditary  and  Civil,  and  to  that  ela- 
borate book  of  Mr  Ashmole's  Institutions  of  the  Order  of  the  Garter,  to  Andrew 
Favin's  Theatre  of  Honour  and  Knighthood,  6i.c.  Only  that  I  may  omit  no  ex- 
terior figures  now  used  in  adorning  escutcheons,  I  siiall  here  mention  a  few  of  the 
most  eminent  of  these  high  secular  orders,  their  institutions,  collars,  and 
and  how  they  are  placed  about  the  shield. 

And  first,  I  shall  begin  with  France,  their  order  of  St  Michael,  which  was  insti- 
tuted by  Lewis  XI.  King  of  France,  in  the  year  1469.  And  that  which  moved 
the  king  to  call  it  St  Michael  (says  Mr  Segar)  was  the  memory  of  the  apparition 
of  that  saint  upon  the  bridge  of  Orleans,  before  the  delivery  of  the  city  besieged 
then  by  the  English.  But  because  I  will  not  trouble  my  reader  with  fabulous 
accounts  about  its  rise,  I  shall  insert  here  that  king's  own  letters  patent  instituting 
the  same,  which  are  as  follows. 

"  Lewis  XI.  King  of  France,  to  all  that  are,  or  shall  be,  greeting.  Beit  known, 
"  that  in  regard  of  the  perfect  and  sincere  love  we  bear  to  the  Noble  Order  of 
"  Knighthood,  the  honour  and  increase  whereof  we  most  ardently  desire,  that  as 
"  we  heartily  wish  the  Holy  Catholic  Faith,  our  Holy  Mother  Church,  and  the 
"  public  prosperity  may  be  maintained,  we,  to  the  glory  of  God  our  Almighty 
"  Creator,  and  in  reverence  of  the  Blessed  Virgin  Mary,  as  also  in  honour  of  St 
"  Michael,  the  prince  and  chief  of  knights,  who  fought  in  God's  cause  against 
"  the  ancient  enemy  of  mankind,  and  cast  him  down  from  heaven,  and  who  has 
"  always  secured  his  place,  preserved  his  oratory,  called  Mount  St  Michael,  with- 
"  out  suffering  it  at  any  time  to  be  taken,  subdued,  or  delivered  into  the  hands 
"  of  the  ancient  enemies  of  this  kingdom.  And  to  the  end  that  aU  generous  and 
"  noble  spirits  may  be  excited,  and  stirred  up  to  virtuous  actions. 

"  The  first  day  of  August,  in  the  year  of  Grace  1469,  and  the  ninth  year  of 
"  our  reign,  at  the  castle  of  Amboise,  we  constitute,  erect,  and  ordain  an  order  of 
"  brotherhood,  or  loving  society,  of  a  certain  number  of  knights,  which  it  is  our 
"  will  shall  be  called.  The  Order  of  St  Michael  the  Archangel,  in  and  under  the 
"  form,  conditions,  statutes,  ordinances,  and  articles  hereafter  set  down." 

Then  follow  the  statutes,  which,  being  in  number  sixty-one,  are  too  long  to  be 
here  inserted.  This  St  Michael  is  the  titular  angel  and  protector  of  France ;  in 
reverence  of  whom  their  ancient  kings  were  wont  to  solsmnize  this  festival-day 
with  great  magnificence,  and  keep  an  open  court.  Their  number  at  first  were  to 
be  thirty-six,  whereof  the  king  and  his  successors  were  chief  and  sovereign  of  this 
order ;  but  it  afterwards  proceeded  to  the  number  of  three  hundred.  Their  habit 
is  doublet,  hose,  shoes,  scabbard,  cope,  band,  and  feather,  all  white ;  the  surcoat 
with  sleeves  is  cloth  of  silver,  over  all  was  a  mantle  of  white  damask  hanging  down 
to  the  ground,  furred  with  ermine,  tied  upon  the  right  shoulder,  and  turned  up  over 
the  left,  having  its  cap  embroidered  with  gold,  and  the  border  of  the  robe  inter- 
woven with  escalops  and  knots  of  gold;  the  chaperon,  or  hood,  with  its  long  tip- 
pet, was  made  of  crimson  velvet.  But  afterwards  King  Henry  II.  of  France  or- 
dered for  the  future  this  cloak  or  mantle  to  be  cloth  of  silver  embroidered  with 
this  device  on  them,  viz.  three  crescents  of  silver  interwoven  with  trophies,  qui- 
vers, and  Turkish  bows,  seme,  and  cantoned  with  tongues  of  fire ;  the  chaperon  or 
hood  of  crimson  velvet  adorned  with  the  same  embroidery.  The  same  King  Hen- 
ry ordered  the  Ch^mcellor  of  the  Order  should  wear  a  cloak  of  white  velvet,  and 
the  hood  of  crimson  velvet.  The  Provost  and  Master  of  the  Ceremonies,  the  Trea- 
surer, Register,  and  King  of  Arms,  white  satin  cloaks,  and  hoods  of  crimson  satin, 
with  a  chain  of  gold  at  the  end,  whereof  an  escalop  of  gold  hangs  upon  the 
breast ;  there  is  also  an  herald  of  arms  to  attend  this  order,  called  Monsieur  St 
Michael. 


S6  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

The  knights  of  this  order,  over  all  their  said  habit,  wear  the  collar  of  St  Mi- 
chael, which  is  very  rich.  The  great  collar  is  of  gold,  as  it  were  tortille,  and 
adorned  with  cockles  of  the  same  metal:  or,  as  others  say,  it  consists  of  double 
escalop-shells  of  gold,  listened  with  round  points  of  black  silk,  and  long  tags  of 
gold  interwoven  after  the  manner  of  true  lovers  knots.  At  the  end  of  which 
(hanging  on  the  breast)  is  annexed  an  oval  of  gold,  and  there  is  a  little  rising  hill 
curiously  enamelled,  on  which  stands  the  figure  of  St  Michael  combating  and 
trampling  down  the  dragon  under  his  feet.  The  motto,  Immensi  tremor  oceaiii. 
Their  annual  and  grand  festival  was  to  be  celebrated  on  Michaelmas-day,  at  the 
church  of  Mount  Michael  in  Normandy  ;  but  afterwards  transferred  to  Bois  de 
Vincennes  near  Paris.  The  great  seal  of  this  order  has  the  figure  of  St  Michael 
engraved  on  it,  in  the  same  manner  as  that  which  hangs  at  the  collar.  The  lesser 
seal  is  three  flower-de-luces,  entoured  with  the  order. 

I  find  several  of  our  nobility  to  have  been  of  this  order  in  the  reign  of  King 
James  V.  and  Q^ieen  Mary.  But  after  the  number  of  the  knights  hereof  were  so 
much  increased,  this  order  lost  of  its  reputation ;  yet  it  is  said  that  the  collar  and 
robe  are  bestowed  only  upon  the  thirty-six.  And  the  pendant  of  St  Michael  given 
to  none  but  the  supernumerary  knights.  This  order  is  not  quite  extinct,  as  some 
writers  would  persuade  us,  but  is  incorporated  into  that  of  the  Holy  Ghost;  upon 
the  institution  whereof  not  only  care  was  taken  to  preserve  this  of  St  Michael  and 
to  rectify  it,  but  the  knights  had  the  privilege  allowed  them,  that  if  they  thought 
fit  they  were  capable  of  receiving  that  of  the  Holy  Ghost,  and  no  stranger  or  na- 
tive could  be  inroUed  therein  who  had  taken  upon  him  any  other  order.  And  there- 
fore all  the  knights  of  the  Holy  Ghost  first  receive  the  Order  of  St  Michael  the 
evening  before  they  are  admitted  into  the  other ;  and  for  that  reason  they  now 
frequently  use  the  collars  of  both  orders  above  their  habit  and  mantle  when  they 
appear  in  their  robes,  and  also  round  their  armorial  shields. 

And  here  it  is  to  be  observed,  that  when  the  royal  armsof  France  are  either  painted, 
tut,  or  embroidered,  with  all  their  exterior  ornaments,  the  collars  of  these  two 
orders  are  constantly  placed  round  the  royal  shield ;  a  figure  whereof  Monsieur 
Baron  has  given  us  in  his  Art  of  Heraldry ;  where  that  of  St  Michael,  as  being 
the  ancientest  order,  takes  place,  and  hath  its  situation  next  the  royal  escutcheon ; 
whereas  that  of  the  Holy  Ghost,  though  esteemed  the  most  honourable,  does  but 
surround  the  collar  of  the  said  saint.  Also  the  knights  of  both  these  orders  are  in 
use  to  wear  both  the  collars,  after  the  same  manner,  round  the  shield  of  their  arms, 
and  the  figure  of  St  Michael  on  their  dexter  side,  when  they  only  wear  that  of  the 
dove  as  the  badge  of  the  Order  of  the  Holy  Ghost  on  their  sinister.  And  here  I 
give  it  as  my  opinion,  though  with  due  respect  to  my  brethren  of  South  Britain, 
that  I  think  it  most  comformable  to  the  rules  of  heraldry,  that  when  the  royal 
arms  of  Great  Britain  are  set  forth  to  pubhc  view,  either  by  painting,  sculpture, 
or  otherwise,  with  exterior  trimmings,  his  Majesty,  as  sovereign  of  the  orders  in 
both  kingdoms,  viz.  that  of  the  Thistle  in  North,  and  that  of  the  Garter  in  South 
Britain,  ought  to  have  his  royal  armorial  shield  adorned  with  the  collars  of  both 
these  high  and  most  honourable  orders  of  knighthood.  And  though  that  of  South 
Britain  be  termed  the  most  noble,  yet  that  of  ours  being  the  more  ancient,  it 
seems  reasonable  to  me  that  the  same  ought  to  be  preferred,  and  have  its  situation 
next  the  royal  shield,  and  that  of  the  Garter  to  surround  the  other,  according  to 
the  figure  Sir  George  Mackenzie  has  given  us  in  his  Science  of  Heraldry,  page  99. 
in  a  sculpture  of  the  achievement  of  his  then  Majesty  of  Great  Britain,  agreeable  to 
the  foresaid  method  used  in  France;  where,  in  justice,  we  cannot  but  allow  those 
of  the  profession  of  heraldry  to  be  well  known  in  the  said  science.  And  all  that 
are  competent  judges  will  also  allow  them  to  be  of  all  nations  the  most  regular  in 
their  marshalling  of  arms,  and  trimming  of  armorial  shields.  And  here  I  commend 
the  justice  South  Britain  has  done  us  at  the  union  of  the  two  kingdoms,  by  mar- 
shalling the  royal  banner  so  as  to  place  our  St  Andrew's  cross  immediately  on  the 
royal  flag  on  its  azure  field,  when  that  of  St  George  does  only  surmount  the  same, 
our  white  saltier  serving  as  a  field  thereto. 

The  Order  of  the  Knights  of  St  Esprit,  or  Holy  Ghost,  in  France,  has  of  late 
years  taken  place  of  all  others,  and  been  accounted  the  most  honourable  Order  in 
that  kingdom.     It  was  instituted  by  King  Henry  111.  of  France,  in  the  year  1578, 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  S7 

to  unite  his  nobles  more  firmly  in  their  obedience,  to  encourage  them  to  persev'ere 
in  the  Komish  religion,  and  to  illustrate  the  state  of  his  nobility.  It  was  so  called 
by  reason  he  was  born  on  Whitsunday  1550,  elected,  that  day,  anno  1573,  King  of 
Poland,  and  on  that  day,  anno  1574,  succeeded  to  the  crown  of  P" ranee.  And  at 
the  same  time  to  rectify  the  abuses  that  were  crept  into  the  Order  of  St  Michael, 
that  had  been  given  to  unworthy  persons,  upon  which  acco-ant  the  two  orders 
were  incorporated,  as  is  observed  before.  The  king's  letters  patent  being  too  long 
here  to  insert,  I  refer  to  Sir  William  Segar's  book,  called  Honour  Military  and 
Civil.  The  most  material  of  the  statutes  are,  that  there  shall  be  a  sovereign  of  the 
order,  who  is  to  have  absolute  authority  over  the  brethren  thereof,  and  all  things 
relating  to  it,  and  that  the  same  be  no  other  but  the  King  of  France,  and  no 
king  to  exercise  that  authority  till  crowned,  and  on  the  coronation-day  to  take  the 
oath  of  the  order  as  follows :  "  We  A,  by  the  grace  of  God,  &c.  do  solemnly 
"  swear  and  vow  on  this  book  in  our  hands  to  God  the  Creator,  to  live  and  die  in 
"  the  Holy  Catholic  and  Apostolic  Faith  and  Religion,  as  to  every  good  and  most 
"  Christian  king  it  belongeth ;  and  rather  to  die  than  fail  at  any  time  therein. 
"  We  swear  also  to  maintain  for  ever  the  Order  of  the  Holy  Ghost,  without  suffer- 
"  ing  it  to  shrink,  fall,  or  diminish,  so  long  as  it  remains  in  our  power  to  help  it, 
"  to  observe  the  statutes  of  the  said  order  truly  and  entirely,  and  never  to  alter  or 
"  change  the  irrevocable  statutes  thereof,"  Stc. 

The  number  of  persons  contained  in  this  order  is  said  to  be  one  hundred 
knights,  besides  the  Sovereign,  or  Great  Master;  which  office  is  inseparable  from  the 
crown  of  France;  and  in  which  said  number  are  comprehended  four  cardinals,  five 
prelates,  the  chancellor,  provost,  master  of  the  ceremonies,  great  treasurer,  and 
scribe,  who  are  called  Commanders.  Their  anniversary  grand  feast  is  held  on  the 
first  day  of  the  new  year,  or  first  of  January,  but  the  first  part  of  the  ceremony 
begins  always  on  the  last  day  of  the  old  year,  when  it  was  instituted ;  and  the 
place  for  celebratmg  thereof  is  the  church  of  Augustine  Friars  in  Paris;  but  if 
the  king  cannot  be  there  present,  then  it  is  to  be  celebrated  where  he  shall  per- 
sonally be,  and  in  the  greatest  church,  there  being  divers  ceremonies  to  be  observed 
by  them  in  the  celebration  thereof,  which  are  set  down  by  Sir  William  Segar, 
page  88. 

The  habit  appointed  for  the  knights  of  this  order  is  a  long  robe  or  mantle  of 
black  velvet,  turned  up  on  the  left  side,  and  opened  on  the  right,  being  at  first  em- 
broidered round  with  gold  and  silver,  consisting  of  flower-de-luces,  and  knots  of 
gold  between  three  sundry  cyphers  of  silver;  and  above  the  flower-de-luces  and 
knots  were  thickly  powdered  flames  of  fire.  This  great  mantle  was  garnished  with 
a  mantle  of  cloth  of  silver,  covered  with  embroidery  made  after  the  same  fashion, 
excepting  only  that  instead  of  cyphers  there  were  wrought  doves  of  silver,  and 
both  these  robes  double-lined  with  a  satin  of  orange  tawny.  The  great  collar 
worn  over  the  mantle  was  at  first  composed  of  flower-de-luces  cantoned,  or  counter- 
ed, with  flames  of  fire,  interwoven  with  three  cyphers  and  divers  monograms  of 
silver;  one  was  the  letter  H,  and  a  Greek  lambda,  both  double,  being  the  initial 
letters  of  the  king's  name,  and  his  queen's,  Louisa  de  Lorrain ;  the  other  two  were 
reserved  in  the  king's  own  mind.  But  these  cyphers  were  taken  off  the  collar,  and 
the  embroidery  of  the  robes,  by  King  Henry  IV.  and,  for  a  mark  of  his  victories, 
trophies  of  arms  were  interlaced  instead  thereof  with  the  letter  H.  crowned,  (the 
initial  of  his  name)  whereout  arose  flames  and  sparks  of  fire ;  and,  for  the  like 
reason,  the  H  has  been  changed  into  L,  both  by  Lewis  XIII.  and  XIV.  At  this 
collar  hung  a  cross,  richly  enamelled  in  the  midst,  whereon  was  figured  a  dove  in 
a  flying  posture,  as  descending  from  Heaven,  with  full  spread  wings:  And  that  an 
epigraph  might  not  be  wanting,  some  have  attributed  to  it  this,  Duce  ^  Auspice. 
Besides  these  ornaments,  the  knights  of  this  order  wear  a  black  velvet  cap,  with  a 
white  plume;  their  breeches  and  doublets  are  of  cloth  of  silver,  and  their  hose  and 
shoes  white,  tied  with  roses  or  knots  of  black  velvet.  The  badges  ordained  to 
be  ordinarily  worn,  are  a  cross  of  yellow,  or  orange  colour  velvet,  like  a  Malta, 
cross  of  eight  points,  fixed  on  the  left  side  of  their  breast,  except  in  military  expe- 
ditions, and  then  they  are  permitted  to  wear  them  of  cloth  of  silver  or  white  velvet, 
having  on  the  middle  of  the  cross  a  silver  dove,  and  at  the  angles,  or  corners,  rays 
and  flower-de-luces  of  silver.     They  have   a  cross  of  the   order  made  of  pold,  of 

VouIL  3  D 


88  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENT.S. 

eight  points,  (like  the  Malta  cross)  with  a  flower-de-luce  in  each  angle,  to  be  worn 
about  tlieir  necks  in  a  blue  ribbon,  and  to  be  enamelled  white  about  the  sides,  but 
not  in  the  middle. 

The  Great  Seal  of  this  order  is  as  large  as  the  Great  Seal  of  France.  In  it  is 
represented  King  Henry  111.  on  a  chair  of  state,  with  the  Chancellor  of  the  order 
on  his  right  hand,  liolding  the  Holy  Gospels,  and  on  his  left  the  register  of  tlVe 
order,  reading  those  oaths  which  knights  are  to  take.  Before  the  king  kneels  the 
knight,  holding  his  hand  on  the  Holy  Evangehsts,  all  of  them  in  their  robes  and 
collars  of  the  order.  On  the  top  of  the  seal,  in  a  great  Hght,  appears  the  Holy 
Ghost  in  the  form  of  a  dove,  descending  over  the  king,  and  about  it  beams  of  light 
and  fiery  tongues.  Round  the  seal  are  these  words,  Heyiry  III.  of  the  name,  by  the 
Grace  of  God,  Kiii^  of  France  and  Pokmd,  Founder  and  Sovereign  of  the  Knights  of 
the  Order  of  the  Holy  Ghost.  On  the  reverse  is  an  escutcheon,  charged  with  three 
flower-de-luces  cantoned  with  four  flames  in  the  same  manner  as  on  the  great 
collar  of  the  order,  and  in  the  upper  part,  instead  of  a  crown,  is  a  dove  descend- 
ing, encompassed,  as  the  rest  of  the  escutcheon,  with  sun-beams  of  gold  and  flames 
of  fire. 

The  Order  of  Knighthood  of  the  Toison  d' Or,  or  of  the  Golden  Fleece,  in  Spain, 
was  instituted  by  Phihp  II.  Duke  of  Burgundy  and  Earl  of  Flanders,  surnamed  the 
Good,  at  his  marriage  with  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  Portugal,  in  the  city  of  Bruges 
in  Flanders,  the  loth  of  January  1429,  to  perpetuate  the  memory  of  his  great  re- 
venues raised  by  wools  with  the  low  countries ;  some  say  in  commemoration  of 
Gideon's  fleece,  or  of  Jacob's  fleece,  viz.  the  party-coloured  and  streaked  fleece, 
after  the  example  of  Jason  and  his  Argonauts,  whose  expedition  to  Colchos  he  in- 
tended to  make  his  pattern  by  a  voyage  into  Syria  against  the  Turks,  for  the  con- 
quest of  the  Holy  Land,  albeit  it  took  no  effect.  The  letters  patent  for  the  insti- 
tution are  dated  the  said  loth  of  January  1429.  He  founded  it  to  the  glory 
of  the  Almighty  Creator  and  Redeemer,  in  reverence  of  the  Virgin  Mary,  and 
St  Andrew  the  Apostle,  whom  he  elected  for  patron  hereof,  and  whose  festival 
was  celebrated  on  that  day,  but  afterwards  translated  to  the  first  of  May,  by  rea- 
son of  the  shortness  of  the  days,  and  the  fatigue  aged  knights  would  find  to  con- 
tinue in  an  intemperate  season,  and  that  but  once  in  three  years,  unless  the  sove- 
reign otherwise  pleaseth.  The  number  of  these  knights  at  the  first  election  were 
twenty-four,  all  gentlemen  unblemished,  himself  and  his  successors  to  be  chiefs 
and  sovereigns  of  the  order,  which  was  always  to  be  to  him  to  whom  the  dukedom 
of  Burgundy  did  lawfully  descend,  who  hath  in  himself  authority  to  give  and  be- 
stow this  honour  to  whom  he  pleaseth ;  the  said  Duke  Phihp  reserved  the  nomi- 
nation of  six  more  knights  at  the  next  chapter.  But  Charles  V.  increased  them, 
anno  1516,  to  fifty.  Duke  Charles  and  Maximilian,  sons  to  the  founder,  annexed 
many  privileges  to  them,  which  were  confirmed  anno  1556.  And  those  who  were 
to  be  admitted  into  this  order  were  obliged  to  renounce  all  other  orders  of  knight- 
hood ;  nevertheless  all  emperors,  kings,  and  dukes,  are  excepted,  unto  whom 
it  is  dispensed  that  they  may  wear  the  ensigns  of  this  order,  if  they  were  sove- 
reigns of  an  order  of  their  own.  To  this  order  doth  belong  four  principal  offi- 
cers, viz.  the  Chancellor,  Treasurer,  Advocate,  and  a  King  at  Arms,  called  'Toison 
d'Or. 

For  their  habit  three  different  mantles  were  ordained  them  at  the  grand  solem- 
nity :  The  first  day  one  of  scarlet  cloth,  richly  embroidered  about  the  lower  end 
with  flints  struck  into  sparks  of  fire,  and  fleeces  with  chaperons  oi  the  same  ;  and  the 
same  day,  after  dinner,  to  proceed  to  vespers  in  mantles  of  black,  and  of  the  co- 
lour of  chaperons  ;  the  day  following  they  were  to  hear  mass,  habited  as  themselves 
thought  fit ;  but  Duke  Charles  afterwards  prescribed  them  mantles  of  white  da- 
mask for  that  day's  ceremony,  and  changed  their  cloth  mantles  into  velvet.  Lo- 
gan, in  his  Analogia  Honorum,  says,  for  habit  they  have  a  cassock  of  crimson 
velvet,  and  over  it  a  mantle  of  the  same,  lined  with  white,  which  openeth  on  the 
right  side,  and  is  turned  upon  the  left  over  the  shoulder,  embroidered  round  about 
\vith  a  border  of  flames,  fusils,  and  fleeces,  and  a  hood  of  crimson  velvet  on  their 
heads. 

The  great  collar  of  this  order  is  of  gold,  composed  of  double  fusils  or  steels, 
placed  back  to  back,  two  and  two  together,  as  if  they  were  double  B,  representing 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


!k> 


It  both  ways,  to  signify  Burgundy.  And  these  fusils  ;ire  interwaven  with  flint 
stones  (in  reverence  to  the  arms  of  the  ancient  kings  of  Burgundy  of  the  French 
race)  seeming  to  strike  fire,  and  sparkles  of  fire  between  them,  tiie  device  of  the 
founder.  At  the  end  whereof  hung  a  pendant,  being  the  resemblance  of  a  golden 
fleece,  enamelled  proper,  which  Jason  won  at  Colchos,  or  as  some  suppose  Gideon's 
fleece,  which  signifies  fidelity  or  justice  uncorrupted.  And  this  collar  or  toison 
they  are  obliged,  upon  a  penalty,  always  to  wear,  and  not  to  make  any  altera- 
tions ;  and  to  sell  or  exchange  it  is  deemed  most  unlawful.  To  the  flint  Paradine 
ascribes  the  motto,  Ante  fa  it  quamflamma  micet,  it  strikes  before  the  fire  appears : 
and  to  the  fleece,  Pretium  non  vile  laboris.  The  jewel  is  commonly  worn  in  a  double 
chainet  or  mails  of  gold,  linked  together  at  convenient  distance,  between  which 
runs  a  small  red  ribbon,  or  otherwise  it  is  worn  in  a  red  ribbon  alone.  Charles 
Duke  of  Burgundy  gave  a  device  to  the  fusil  in  the  collar,  being  an  instrument  to 
strike  fire,  called  an  ansil,  which,  with  these  words  foresaid,  Antefetit  quamflamma. 
micet,  became  his  device  ;  meaning  he  had  power  to  kindle  great  trouble  before 
it  was  perceived,  which  he  did  to  King  Lewis  XI.  of  France.  But  afterwards  was 
unlucky  in  his  war  against  Benato  Duke  of  Lorrain,  who  defeated  his  army,  and 
killed  himself  before  Nantz,  who  seeing  Duke  Charles'  standard  brought  to  him 
with  the  fusil  and  motto  upon  it,  said  he  was  an  unfortunate  prince,  who,  when  he 
had  most  need  to  warm  himself,  wanted  leisure  to  strike  fire,  the  earth  being  then 
covered  with  snow. 

The  emperors  of  Germany  descended  from  Philip  Archduke  of  Austria,  Duke 
of  Burgundy,  and  Count  of  Flanders,  were  the  sovereigns  of  this  order,  till  Charles 
V.  gave  the  guardianship  of  it  to  the  kings  of  Spain,  which  he  performed  on  the 
25th  of  October  1556,  conferring  it  on  his  son  King  Philip  at  Brussels,  who 
ascended  the  throne  of  Spain  in  right  of  his  wife.  When  he  took  the  collar-  from 
his  neck,  and  with  his  own  hands  put  it  over  his  son's  shoulders,  in  the  presence  of 
divers  of  the  knights,  with  this  form,  "  Accipe,  fill  mi,  quern  e  collo  meodetraho,  tibi 
"  prrecipuum,  aurei  velleris  torquem,  quem  Philippus  Dux  Burgundire,  cognomine 
"  Bonus,  atavus  noster,  monumentum  fidei  sacra  RomaiKc  ecclesia;,  esse  voluit, 
"  &  hujusce  institutionis  ac  legum  ejus  fac  semper  memineris :  "  Since  which 
the  honour  of  being  chief  of  this  order  remains  at  this  day  in  the  crown  of 
Spain. 

Duke  Charles,  son  of  Philip,  (the  first  institutor  of  the  order)  as  he  was  the 
second  sovereign  of  this  order,  so  he  was  the  first  that  on  his  seal  surrounded  the 
escutcheon  of  his  arms  with  the  collar  thereof,  as  is  to  be  seen  on  his  seal  append- 
ed to  several  diplomas  in  the  year  1470.  As  Ohvarus  Uredus,  in  his  Treatise  de 
Sigillis  Comitum  Flandria,  hath  given  us  a  figure  thereof ;  so  that,  as  I  observe,  this 
is  the  oldest  practice  of  surrounding  armorial  shields  with  the  collars  worn  by 
knights  of  high  and  sovereign  orders  of  knighthood.  But  how  soon  the  like  was 
practised  in  France,  I  have  not  as  yet  discovered.  As  for  our  usage  of  this  me- 
thod in  trimming  the  achievements  of  the  several  knights  of  our  high  orders  of 
knighthood  in  North  and  South  Britain,  sure  I  am  the  former  example  of  Duke 
Charles  in  adorning  his  shield  of  arms  this  way,  is  long  prior  to  the  practice  there- 
of with  us. 

His  son-in-law  Maximilian  Duke  of  Austria,  (son  to  the  Emperor  Frederick 
III.)  by  marrying  his  daughter  and  heiress  Mary  Dutchess  of  Burgundy  and  Coun- 
tess of  Flanders,  besides  their  other  seals  of  arms,  used  also  one  called  si'^illum  se- 
cretum,  which  is  appended  to  several  evidents,  upon  which  was  a  lion  seiaiit,  hold- 
ing by  his  right  paw  the  shield  of  Maximilian,  and  in  his  left  that  of  Mary 
Dutchess  of  Burgundy  :  and  about  the  neck  of  the  lion  supporter  of  both  these 
shields  hung  the  collar  of  the  golden  fleece,  with  his  head  in  a  helmet  grille  m 
profile,  adorned  with  volets,  and  crowned  with  a  crown  of  one  arch  ;  and  the  le- 
gend round  the  seal,  Sigillum  sec  return  Maximiliani  y  Maria  Ducum  Austria, 
Burgundice,  Brabantia,  Comitum  Fiandria,  Tirolis,  &-c.  And  it  is  to  be  observed, 
their  successors,  when  represented  on  their  seals,  enthronized,  and  in  their  robes, 
had  the  said  collar  about  their  necks.  And  when  emperors  and  kings  of  Spain 
they  used  it  round  their  shields  of  arms,  as  sovereigns  of  the  order.  So  much  then 
concerning  the  sovereign  orders  of  knighthood  abroad,  and  their  manner  of  placing 
of  collars  and  badges  of  royal  knighthood  round  arms.     Forbearing  to  proceed 


90 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


further  to  give  a  descnption  of  many  others  in  Europe,  as  out  of  my  road,  I  shall 
next  proceed  to  give  a  description  of  the  orders  of  knighthood  in  Britain,  beginning 
first  with  those  in  South  Britain. 

Where  the  Knights  of  the  Round  Table  may,  for  antiquity,  challenge  the  first 
place,  being  an  order  accounted  absolutely  military,  and  founded  by  the  valiant 
Arthur  King  of  Britain,  who  reigned  about  the  year  of  Christ  516,  and  who  lived 
in  such  great  renown  that  worthy  knights  came  from  all  parts  to  his  court  as  a 
seminary  of  discipline,  to  demonstrate  their  valour  in  point  of  arms.  This  gave 
him  occasion  to  select  out  of  these,  and  his  own  subjects,  some  say  twenty-four, 
others  a  greater  number,  amongst  whom  himself  was  chief  of  the  most  valiant, 
which  he  united  in  a  fellowship  ;  and,  to  avoid  all  controversy  about  precedency, 
caused  a  round  table  to  be  made,  whence  the  order  had  its  appellation.  He  ad- 
mitted not  only  Britons,  but  strangers  ;  and  their  qualifications  were  to  be  per- 
sons of  nobility,  dignity,  and  renowned  for  virtue  and  valour.  The  place  where 
they  were  instituted  was  Windsor,  and  their  time  of  convening  was  Whitsuntide. 
In  Winchester  Castle  was  a  large  round  table,  called  (and  affirmed  to  be)  King 
Arthur's,  or  at  least  set  up  in  the  room  of  one  more  ancient,  which  was  destroyed 
in  the  late  civil  wars,  with  other  reliques  there.  The  articles  which  these 
knights  vowed  to  keep,  were  to  be  always  well  armed,  both  for  horse  and 
foot  service,  either  by  land  or  sea,  and  to  be  always  ready  to  assail  tyrants  or 
oppressors,  to  protect  and  defend  widows,  maidens,  and  children,  to  maintain  the 
Christian  faith,  &c.  I  forbear  to  relate  more  concerning  this  order,  as  not  answer- 
ing my  design  relative  to  exterior  ornaments,  of  the  armorial  shields,  in  regard  I 
find  no  authentic  proof  what  badge  they  bore,  notwithstanding  the  report  that 
King  Arthur  had  a  shield  named  Pridwin,  wherein  the  Virgin  Mary  was  de- 
picted. His  sword  and  lance  had  also  their  names,  one  being  called  Caliburne, 
the  other  Irone  or  Rone.  Neither  is  it  remembered  that  this  order  survived  the 
founder,  but  rather  that  it  expired  with  him,  most  of  these  knights  perishmg  with 
him  at  the  battle  of  Kamclan,  now  Camelford  in  Cornwall,  where  he  was  killed, 
anno  542. 

The  next  order  of  knighthood  in  South  Britain,  is  the  Most  Noble  Order  of  the 
Garter,  or  St  George,  which  being  a  royal  order,  generally  so  well  known,  and 
has  been  treated  of  by  so  many  learned  writers,  particularly  so  copiously  by  Elias 
Ashmole,  who  has  obliged  the  world  with  a  large  folio  on  the  history  thereof,  a 
little  said  will  suffice,  referring  the  curious  to  him,  Peter  Heylyn  and  others,  who 
have  wrote  of  it  at  large.  It  owes  its  original,  as  is  confessed  on  all  hands,  to  Ed- 
ward III.  King  of  England  and  France,  in  the  year  1350.  The  vulgar  and  more 
general  account  thereof  is,  that  the  garter  of  Joan,  Countess  of  Salisbury,  drop- 
ping casually  off"  as  she  danced  in  a  solemn  ball.  King  Edward  stooping,  took  it 
up  from  the  ground,  whereupon  some  of  his  nobles  smiling,  as  at  an  amorous  ac- 
tion, and  he  observing  their  sportive  humour,  turned  it  off"  with  a  reply  in  French, 
Honi  suit  qui  mal  y  pease ;  but  withall  added,  in  disdain  of  their  laughter,  "  That 
•'  shortly  they  should  see  that  garter  advanced  to  so  high  an  honour  and  renown, 
"  as  to  account  themselves  happy  to  wear  it."  Segar  says,  that  King  Edward 
dancing  with  the  queen  and  other  ladies  of  his  court,  happened  to  take  up  a  blue 
garter  which  fell  from  one  of  them,  which  the  king  wore  after  about  his  right 
leg  for  a  favour ;  whereat  the  queen  taking  offence,  it  was  signified  to  the  king 
that  she  was  displeased  ;  upon  which  he  said,  Honi  soil  qui  mal  y  pense,  i.  e.  Shame 
be  to  him  that  evil  thinks.  I  will  make  of  it  (continues  he)  e're  it  be  long, 
the  most  honourable  garter  that  ever  was  worn,  and  thereupon  instituted  this  or- 
der. Yet,  in  the  original  statutes  of  this  order,  there  is  not  the  least  ground  to 
countenance  the  conceit  of  such  a  feminine  institution,  no  not  so  much  (says 
Mr  Ashmole)  as  laying  an  obligation  on  the  knights  companions  to  defend  the 
quarrel  of  ladies,  as  some  orders  then  in  being  enjoined.  But  that  this  may  ap- 
pear, what  indeed  it  is,  a  mere  fable,  we  shall  insert  the  judgment  of  Dr  Heylyn, 
who  took  great  pains  in  this  particular.  "  This,  says  he,  I  take  to  be  a  vain  and 
"  idle  romance,  derogatory  both  to  the  founder  and  the  order  first  pubhshed  by 
"  Pol.  Virgil,  a  stranger  to  the  affairs  of  England,  and  by  him  taken  upon  no  bet- 
"  ter  ground  than/*?«a  vulgi,  the  tradition  of  the  common  people,  too  trifling  a 
"  foundation  to  so  great  a  building." 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  91 

The  true  motive  w-as  therefore  neither  the  lady's  garter,  or  King  Ricliard's 
leathern  thong,  to  wliich  it  owes  its  original :  But  King  Edward  being  a  person 
of  consummate  vntue,  gave  himself  up  to  military  atiairs;  and  being  engaged  in 
war  for  recovering  his  right  to  France,  made  use  of  the  best  martialists  of  the  age  ; 
and  did  thereupon  first  design  (induced  by  its  ancient  fame)  the  restoration  of  king 
Arthur's  round  table  foresaid,  the  better  to  invite  hither  the  gallant  spirits  from 
abroad,  and  endear  them  to  liimself;  and  adjudging  noplace  more  proper  than 
Windsor,  upon  new  year's  day,  anno  1344,  he  issued  out  letters  of  protection  for 
the  safe  gomg  and  returning  of  foreign  knights,  to  try  their  valour  at  the  solemn 
jousts,  tilts,  and  tournaments,  to  be  held  there  on  Monday,  after  the  feast  of  St 
Hilary  following  ;  and  royally  entertained  them  with  magnificent  feasts  and  other 
princely  favours,  to  engage  them  unto  him  ;  and  ordained  this  festival  to  be  annu- 
ally at  Whitsuntide,  and  immediately  after  caused  erect  a  building  in  Windsor 
Gastle,  and  therein  placed  a  table  of  two  hundred  feet  diameter,  where  the  knights 
should  have  their  entertainment  of  diet  at  his  expence  of  100  lib.  per  week,  which 
he  called,   The  Round  Table. 

But  Philip  de  Valois,  King  of  France,  in  emulation  of  this  seminary  at  Wind- 
sor, set  up  a  round  table  at  his  court,  and  invited  knights  and  valiant  men  of 
arms  out  of  Italy  and  Alleraagne  thither,  lest  they  should  repair  to  King  Edward 
111.  which,  meeting  with  success,  proved  a  counter-mine  to  his  main  design.  He  at 
length  resolved  upon  a  projection,  more  particular  and  select,  and  sucli  as  might 
oblige  those  whom  he  thought  fit  to  make  his  associates  in  a  lasting  bond  of  friend- 
ship and  honour:  And  having  issued  forth  his  own  garter  for  the  signal  of  battle,  that 
was  crowned  with  success,  (which  is  conceived  to  be  the  battle  of  Cressy,  fought 
three  hours  after  his  erecting  the  Round  Table  ;)  upon  so  remarkable  a  victory,  he 
thence  took  occasion  to  institute  this  order,  and  the  garter  had  the  pre-eminence 
among  the  ensigns  of  it ;  whence  that  select  number,  whom  he  incorporated  into 
a  fraternity,  are  stiled  Equites  aiireit  periscelidis,  and  vulgarly.  Knights  of  the  Garter. 
By  this  symbol  he  designed  to  bind  the  knights  and  fellows  of  it  mutually  unto 
one  another,  and  all  of  them  jointly  to  himself,  as  sovereign  of  the  order ;  nor  was 
his  expectation  frustrated,  for  it  served  not  only  as  a  spur  to  honour  and  martial 
virtue,  but  also  a  golden  bond  of  unity  ;  and  therefore  Mr  Camden  aptly  calls  it  a 
badge  of  unity  and  concord.  The  garter  was  the  only  part  of  the  whole  habit  of 
the  order  worn  at  first.  And  that  none  might  believe  (says  Mr  Miege  in  his  State 
of  South  Britain)  that  the  sovereign  had  any  other  design  but  what  was  just  and 
honourable,  the  above  motto  was  ordered  to  be  wrought  on  the  garter,  Honi  soil 
qui  mal  y  pense.  The  same  being  put  in  French,  because  being  then  possessed  of 
a  great  part  of  France,  that  tongue  was  very  familiar  in  England.  And  Mr  Ash- 
mole  tells  us,  that  when  the  said  King  Edward  III.  had  laid  claim  by  his  title  to 
the  kingdom  of  France,  in  right  of  his  mother,  and  assuming  its  arms,  he,  from 
the  colour  of  them,  caused  the  garter  to  be  made  blue,  and  the  circumscription 
gold  ;  and,  without  straining  the  said  motto,  it  may  be  inferred  therefrom,  that  he 
retorted  shame  and  defiance  upon  him  that  should  dare  to  think  amiss  of  so  just 
an  enterprize,  as  he  had  undertaken  for  recovering  of  his  lawful  right  to  that 
crown. 

The  value  of  this  order  is  much  enhanced  by  the  small  number  it  contains, 
having  at  the  first  institution  been  appointed  for  only  twenty-six,  including  the 
sovereign,  and  that  number  never  after  increased  ;  whereas  all  other  orders  (ex- 
cept our  own)  have  been  so  freely  bestowed,  that  they  have  lost  much  of  their 
esteem  by  it. 

The  patrons  of  this  order  were  several,  under  whose  protection  (according  to  the 
custom  of  the  age)  King  Edward  III.  put  himself  and  all  the  knights  companions, 
that  the  affairs  of  the  order  might  be  defended,  preser\-ed,  and  governed.  The 
first  and  chiefest  which  he  elected  was  the  Holy  Trinity,  idly.  The  Virgin 
Mary,  accounted  then  the  general  mediatrix  and  protectress  of  all  men.  jrf/y,  St 
George  of  Cappadocia,  a  choice  martyr,  soldier,  and  champion  of  Christ,  in  re- 
spect of  whom  the  knights  had  the  title  oi  Ecpiites  Georgiani,  St  George's  Knights: 
and  the  order  itself  came  to  be  called  the  Ordo  divi  Saiicti  Georgii,  the  Order  of 
St  George.  And,  if  we  may  believe  Harding,  it  is  recorded  that  King  Arthur 
paiH  St  George  particular  hoiiours,  for  he  advanced  his  picture  in  one  of  his  baij- 
VoL.U.  3E 


92 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


ners.  And,  lastly.  The  founder  added  a  fourth  patron,  viz.  St  Edward  the  Con- 
fessor, King  of  England  ;  and  we  find  he  was  invocated  by  this  founder,  as  well 
as  St  George,  in  any  great  difficulty  and  straits.  Walsingham  gives  an  instance 
at  the  skirmish  of  Calais,  anno  1349,  when  King  Edward  in  great  anger  and 
grief  drew  out  his  sword,  and  most  passionately  cried  out.  Ha  St  Edward,  Ha  St 
George. 

This  order  has  been  honoured  with  the  companionship  of  eight  Emperors  of  Ger- 
many, three  Kings  of  Spain,  five  Kings  of  France,  two  Kings  of  Scotland,  five 
Kings  of  Denmark,  five  Kings  of  Portugal,  two  Kings  of  Sweden,  one  King  of  Po- 
land, one  King  of  Arragon,  two  Kings  of  Naples,  besides  divers  foreign  dukes 
and  other  free  princes,  by  which  the  knights  and  noblemen  of  this  order  are  raised 
to  this  pitch  of  greatness,  as  to  be  companions  and  associates  with  emperors  and 
kings,  a  prerogative  of  an  high  nature,  and  a  sufficient  recompense  for  the  great- 
est merit.  And  the  learned  Selden  bestowed  an  high  eulogy  on  it,  in  saying,  that 
it  exceeds  in  majesty,  honour,  and  fame,  all  chivalrous  orders  of  the  world. 

The  habit  and  ensigns  of  this  most  noble  order  are  most  eminently  distinguish- 
able, and  magnificent,  and  consists  of  these  particulars,  viz.  the  garter,  mantle, 
surcoat,  and  hood,  which  were  assigned  the  knights  companions  by  the  founder, 
and  the  George  and  collar  by  King  Henry  VIII.  all  which  are  called  the  whole 
habit  or  ensigns  of  the  order.  The  royal  garter  challengeth  the  pre-eminence,  for 
from  it  this  famous  order  received  its  denomination;  it  is  the  first  part  of  the  habit 
presented  to  foreign  princes  and  absent  knights,  and  that  wherewith  they  and  all 
other  elect  knights  are  first  adorned,  and  of  so  great  honour  and  grandeur,  that  by 
the  bare  investiture  with  this  noble  ensign,  the  knights  are  esteemed  companions 
of  this  order.  The  materials  whereof  is  an  arcanum  ;  as  to  the  ornamental  part 
of  it,  it  was  adorned  with  gold  and  precious  stones,  and  had  a  buckle  of  gold  at 
the  end,  to  fasten  it  about  the  leg.  This,  according  to  Polydore  Virgil.  But  ttre 
garter  sent  to  Emanuel  Duke  of  Savoy,  anno  ist  and  2d  Philip  and  Mary,  was  set 
with  letters  of  goldsmith's  work,  the  buckle  and  pendant  of  the  same,  and  on  the 
pendant  a  ruby,  and  a  pearl  hanging  at  the  end.  But  that  garter  sent  to  Gusta- 
vus  Adolphus  King  of  Sweden  outvied  all  others  conferred  by  former  sovereigns, 
each  letter  of  the  motto  being  composed  of  small  diamonds  ;  and  for  every  stop  a 
diamond  within  a  range  of  diamonds  above  and  below  on  the  sides  of  the  garter, 
and  besides  other  diamonds  on  the  buckle,  and  about  the  same,  to  the  number  in 
all  of  411.  The  garter  which  King  Charles  I.  wore  upon  his  leg  at  the  time  of 
his  martyrdom  had  the  letters  of  the  motto  composed  likewise  of  diamonds,  which 
amounted  to  the  number  of  412.  It  came  to  the  hands  of  Captain  Preston  (one  of 
the  usurper's  captains)  from  whom  the  trustees  for  sale  of  the  king's  goods  receiv- 
ed it,  and  sold  it  to  Ireton,  Mayor  of  London,  for  205  lib.  The  motto  of  King 
Charles  II.  was  set  with  diamonds  upon  blue  velvet,  and  the  border  wrought  with 
fine  gold  wire,  the  hinge  of  the  buckle  was  pure  gold,  and  on  it  the  sovereign's 
picture  to  the  breast  curiously  cut,  crowned  with  laurel,  and  on  the  back  side  was 
engraven  St  George  on  horseback  encountering  the  dragon.  At  the  first  erection 
the  garter  was  appointed  to  be  wore  on  the  left  leg  a  little  beneath  the  knee ;  which 
usage  still  presides.  And  the  placing  it  thus  on  the  sepulchral  portraitures  of 
knights  companions  was  an  early  custom  :  For,  on  the  alabaster  monument  of  Sir 
William  Fitzwarin,  who  was  interred  in  the  north  side  of  the  chancel  at  Wantage  in 
Com.  Berks,  35th  Edward  III.  he  lies  there  with  his  surcoat  of  arms  upon  his  breast, 
and  the  representation  of  a  garter  (but  without  a  motto)  carved  upon  his  left  leg, 
and  the  like  on  several  other  monuments.  Thenceforward  the  practice  became 
more  frequent,  and  then  the  motto  began  to  be  cut  thereon  ;  in  so  much  that  it  is 
now  the  constant  and  just  practice  to  do  it  whensoever  the  knights  companions  are 
exhibited  in  effigies. 

The  second  ensign  is  the  mantle,  which  is  the  chief  of  these  vestments  which 
the  sovereign  and  knights  companions  make  use  of  upon  all  solemn  occasions  re- 
lating to  the  order.  That  this  pattern  was  derived  to  us  from  the  ancient  Greeks 
and  Romans,  is  not  at  all  to  be  disputed,  since  it  so  little  varies  in  fashion  from 
their  pallium  or  toga.  This  upper  robe,  called  the  mantle,  which  was  prepared  for 
the  founder  against  the  first  feast  of  this  order,  appears  to  be  fine  woollen  cloth. 
And  the  first  time  we  discover  the  mantle  to  be  of  velvet,  is  about  the  beginning 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


93 


of  the  reign  of  King  Henry  VI.  which  sort  of  silk  hath  thence  remained  unto  this 
day.  The  colour  of  these  mantles  is  appouited  by  the  statutes  to  be  blue,  and  of 
this  colour  was  the  founder's,  by  which,  as  by  the  ground-work  of  the  garter,  it 
is  not  improbable  he  alluded  to  the  colour  of  the  field  in  the  French  arms,  which 
a  few  years  before  he  began  to  quarter  with  those  of  England,  and  of  the  same  co- 
lour were  the  velvet  mantles  in  the  time  of  Henry  VI.  who,  though  he  altered  the 
stuff,  did  not  vary  the  dye.  It  is  apparent  that  the  blue  colour  was  retained  to 
King  Edward  IV's.  reign;  for  when  tiiis  sovereign  transmitted  the  habit  and  en- 
signs of  the  order  to  Julian  de  Medicis,  the  mantle  was  of  blue  velvet.  And  in 
the  reign  of  Ring  Henry  Vlll.  the  mantle  sent  by  that  king  to  our  King  James 
V.  was  of  blue  velvet,  and  in  the  ancient  form  of  admonition  and  signification  ap- 
pointed to  be  spoken  at  the  investiture  of  foreign  princes,  it  is  called  the  mantle  of 
celestial  colour.  In  Q^ieen  Elizabeth's  reign,  upon  what  ground  history  is  silent, 
the  colour  of  foreign  princes'  mantles  was  changed  from  blue  to  purple  ;  for  of  that 
colour  was  the  mantle  she  sent  to  the  French  King,  Charles  the  IX.  and  to  the 
Emperor  and  King  of  Denmark.  Thus  the  purple  colour  came  in  request,  and 
continued  till  about  the  I2th  of  King  Charles  I.  restored  the  colour  of  the  mantle 
to  the  primitive  institution;  and  the  sovereign  and  knights  to  honour  the  installati- 
on of  the  prince,  afterwards  King  Charles  II.  made  the  first  essay  of  these  mantles, 
being  of  rich  blue  velvet  got  from  Genoa.  But  on  the  14th  of  January  anno  12. 
Car.  II.  the  mantles  and  surcoats  of  the  knights  companions  were  to  be  of  sky- 
colour  and  crimson  velvet ;  the  only  difference  of  the  mantles  betwixt  the  sove- 
reign, foreign  princes,  and  knights  subjects  is,  that  the  two  first  have  theirs  more 
full  and  extensive  with  a  long  train,  and  the  last  have  theirs  more  scanty.  The 
left  shoulder  of  each  of  these  mantles  have,  from  the  institution,  been  adorned  with 
a  large  fair  garter  containing  the  said  motto,  Honi  soit  qui  mal  y  pense.  And  with- 
in this  garter  was  the  arms  of  St  George,  viz.  argent  a  cross  gules,  first  wrought  in 
satin,  with  gold,  silver,  and  silk,  but  afterwards  it  was  more  richly  done  on  velvet. 
The  garter  fi.xed  on  the  mantle  of  King  Charles  II.  was  done  with  large  Oriental 
pearl.  The  lining  of  this  robe  was  white  damask,  afterwards  white  satin,  but  now 
it  is  lined  with  taffeta:  For  exemplary  ornament  the  mantle  had  fixed  to  its  collar 
a  pair  of  long  strings  anciently  woven  of  blue  silk  only  (called  cordons,  robe  strings 
or  laces)  but  of  later  days  twisted  round,  and  made  of  Venice  gold,  and  silk  of 
the  colour  of  the  robe,  at  each  end  of  which  hang  a  great  knob  or  button,  wrought 
over,  and  raised  with  a  rich  caul  of  gold,  and  tassels  thereunto  of  like  silk  and 
gold  :  And  at  the  collar  was  usually  fixed  an  hook  and  eye  of  gold  for  its  firmer  af- 
fixing of  it  to  the  shoulders. 

The  third  ensign  of  the  order  is  the  surcoat,  or  kirtle;  it  owes  its  original  to  the 
?//«?(:«  of  the  Greeks  and  Romans,  which  was  worn  next  under  the  ^(yra;  it  was 
called  at  first  roba  and  tunica.  And  as  the  first  mantles,  so  the  first  surcoats  were 
composed  of  woollen  cloth,  and  continued  so  till  the  reign  of  King  Edward  IV. 
but  afterwards  became  velvet,  as  they  are  at  this  day,  though  sometimes  they  were 
blue,  white,  and  other  colours,  till  the  reign  of.  King  Henry  VIII.  that  they  were 
ordained  to  be  of  crimson  velvet,  and  do  so  continue.  At  the  institution  of  this 
order,  and  a  long  time  after,  the  surcoat  was  powdered  all  over  with  little  garters, 
embroidered  with  silk  and  gold  plate,  in  each  of  which  was  wrought  the  motto, 
Honi  soit,  &-C.;  besides,  the  buckles  and  pendant  to  these  small  garters  were  silver 
gilt;  of  these  garters  there  were  no  less  than  160  upon  the  first  surcoat  and  hood 
made  for  the  founder.  But  this  drapery  of  their  robes  became  at  length  quite  ob- 
solete, perhaps  when  cloth  was  altered  to  velvet,  and  the  plain  surcoat  hath  to  this 
day  continued  in  use;  when  they  were  of  cloth  they  were  lined  with  bellies  of 
pure  minever  fur,  only  the  sovereign's  was  purfled  with  eniiine.  Afterwards  the 
prince,  a  duke,  a  marquis,  an  earl,  had  each  of  them  five  timbre  of  pure  minever 
allowed  to  a  surcoat;  but  the  viscount,  baron,  baronet,  and  bachelor  knights,  but 
three  timbre  a  piece.  In  time  these  furs  were  disused,  and  the  surcoat  came  to  be 
lined  with  white  sarsenet  till  temp,  Eliz.  white  taffeta  succeeded,  and  that  still 
continues. 

'i  he  hood  and  cap  comes  in  the  next  place  to  be  spoken  of,  which,  in  the  black 
book  of  the  order,  is  called  qapucium,  and  in  the  time  of  King  Richard  II.  it  is 
called  after  the  French  chaperon;  they  were  anciently  wore  for  defence  of  the  head 


94 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS, 


against  inclemencies  of  weather  but  of  later  times  caps  and  hats  have  supplied  their 
place,  yet  is  not  the  hood  quite  thrown  by,  since  it  is  still  kept  reclining  upon  the 
back,  almost  like  a  pilgrim's  hat.  It  was  heretofore,  and  now  is  generally  made  of 
the  same  materials  as  the  surcoat,  and  was  anciently  trimmed,  and  set  off  with 
a  small  proportion  of  garters,  lined  with  cloth  of  a  different  colour,  and  such  as 
would  best  strike  the  sight.  But  now  with  taffeta,  as  is  the  lining  of  the  surcoat. 
As  to  the  cap,  which  was  instituted  to  succeed  the  hood,  it  hath  been,  and  yet  is, 
fashioned  of  black  velvet,  lined  with  taffeta;  but  the  figure  hath  several  times 
varied ;  for  in  King  Henry  Vlll.  his  time,  it  was  flat,  in  Queen  Elizabeth's  reign 
it  was  a  little  raised  in  the  head,  but  in  King  James's  time  they  were  much  more 
high  crowned.  This  cap  hath  been  usually  adorned  with  plumes  of  white  feathers, 
and  sprigs,  and  bound  about  with  a  band  set  thick  with  diamonds;  so  was  the  cap 
for  the  installation  of  King  Charles  II.  and  sometimes  the  brims  have  been  tacked 
up  with  a  large  and  costly  jewel. 

To  these  may  be  added  the  cross  of  the  order,  encompassed  with  a  garter,  which 
by  the  sovereign  was  ordained  the  27th  of  April,  ido  Car.  I.  to  be  worn  upon  the 
left  side  of  the  cloaks,  coats,  and  riding  cassocks,  of  the  sovereigns  and  knights 
companions,  of  the  prelate,  and  chancellor,  at  all  times,  when  not  adorned  with 
their  robes.  And  it  was  not  long  after  ere  the  ^lory,  or  star,  as  it  was  usually  called, 
having  certain  beams  of  silver,  that  shot  out  in  form  of  a  cross,  was  introduced, 
and  annexed  to  it,  in  imitation  of  the  French,  who  after  the  same  manner  wore  the 
chief  ensign  of  the  Order  of  the  Holy  Ghost,  being  the  representation  of  a  dove 
irradiated  with  such  like  beams. 

There  remains  now  the  co/lar  and  George,  brought  in  by  King  Henry  VIII. 
This  collar  was  ordained  to  be  of  gold  thirty  ounces  Troy  weight,  but  not  to  ex- 
ceed it ;  howbeit  that  collar  sent  to  Gustavus  Adolphus  King  of  Sweden  weighed 
thirty-four  ounces  and  a  quarter,  and  that  of  King  Charles  I.  thirty-five  ounces 
and  an  half,  which,  after  his  sufferings,  fell  into  the  hands  of  Thomas  Harrison, 
one  of  Oliver's  major-generals,  and  was  by  him  delivered  to  the  trustees  for  sale  of 
the  king's  goods,  and  they  in  1649  ^^"^  '^  '•^  ^^^  mint,  with  divers  of  the  regalia, 
to  set  the  stamp  on  work  for  the  first  gold  that  the  upstart  commonwealth  coined. 
It  was  appointed  by  King  Henry  VIII.  that  this  collar  should  be  composed  of 
pieces  of  gold,  in  fashion  of  garters,  the  ground  enamelled  blue,  and  the  letters  of 
the  motto  of  gold ;  in  the  midst  of  each  garter  two  roses  placed,  the  innermost 
enamelled  red,  and  the  outermost  white  ;  contrarily  in  the  next  garter,  the  inner- 
most white  and  the  outermost  red,  and  so  alternately:  But  of  later  times  these 
roses  are  wholly  red.  And  since  our  King  James  succeeded  to  the  crown  of 
England,  there  hath  been  an  intermixture  of  thistles.  The  number  of  these  gar- 
ters were  twenty-six,  being  fastened  together  with  as  many  knots  of  gold;  nor 
ought  the  collar  to  be  adorned  or  enriched  with  precious  stones,  (as  the  George 
may  be)  such  being  prohibited  by  the  law  of  the  order. 

At  the  middle  of  the  collar,  before  pendent,  at  the  table  of  one  of  the  garters  in. 
the  collar  is  to  be  fixed  the  image  of  St  George  armed,  sitting  on  horseback,  who, 
having  thrown  the  dragon  on  his  back,  encounters  him  with  a  tilting  spear.  This 
jewel  is  not  encompassed  with  a  garter  or  row  of  diamonds  as  in  the  lesser  George, 
but  in  a  round  relief.  It  is  allowed  to  be  beautified  and  set  off  with  diamonds  and 
other  enrichments  at  the  pleasure  of  the  knight  companion  who  possessed  it,  and 
upon  that  score  it  hath  been  frequently  adorned  with  variety  of  costly  work, 
whereon  the  diamonds  and  other  precious  stones  were  set,  to  that  advantage  as 
might,  upon  its  motion  and  agitation,  dart  forth  a  resplendent  lustre.  We  come 
now  to  the  lesser  George  of  the  order,  and  we  do  not  find  that  the  effigies  of  St 
George  was  at  any  time  worn  by  the  sovereign  or  knights  companions,  before  the 
breast,  or  under  the  arm,  as  now  used,  till  the  13th  of  Henry  VIII.  But  then  that 
king  decreed  that  every  knight  should  wear  loosely  before  his  breast  the  image  of 
St  George  in  a  gold  chain,  or  otherwise  in  a  ribbon,  the  same  to  be  fastened  with- 
in the  ennobled  garter,  as  a  manifest  distinction  between  the  knights  companions 
and  others  of  the  nobility  and  knights,  who,  according  to  the  mode  of  these  times, 
wore  large  gold  chains,  or  collars,  the  ordinary  signs  of  knighthood,  of  which  after- 
wards. And  thus  the  wearing  the  medal  or  jewel,  usually  called  the  lesser  George, 
to  distinguish  it  from  the  other  work  at  the  collar  of  the  order,  first  received  the 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  95 

injunction,  and  hath  since  been  tVequently  used.  Tliis  George  was,  for  the  most 
part,  of  pure  gold,  curiously  w rouglit,  but  divers  of  them  were  exquisitely  graved 
ill  onvxes  and  agates,  and  with  sucli  a  happy  collection  of  precious  stones,  that 
heightened  and  received  their  beauty  by  the  skill  of  tiie  artificer.  In  contriving 
the  tigures  and  history,  the  natural  tincture  of  the  stones  have  fitted  them  with 
coUnub  fir  flesh,  hair,  and  every  thing  else,  even  to  surprise  and  admiration.  In 
this  jewel  is  St  George  represented  in  a  riding  postiue  encountering  tiie  dragon 
with  his  drawn  sword.  By  the  last  article  of  K-ing  Henry  Vlll.'s  statutes  it  was 
allowed  to  be  enriched  at  the  pleasure  of  the  possessor,  (as  in  the  great  George^ 
which  for  the  most  part  hath  been  curioasly  enamelled,  and  tiie  garter  about  it  set 
with  diamonds:  The  weight  and  bigness  of  these  lesser  Georges,  being  an  ounce 
and  an  half,  and  half  quarter  weight.  This  jewel  was  luiiig  at  a  gold  chain;  after- 
wards they  were  worn  in  silk  ribbons  as  well  as  gold  chains,  which  were  promiscu- 
ously used,  and  ad  libitum:  And  so  were  the  symbols  of  foreign  orders,  as  divert 
coins  and  medals  declare.  The  colour  of  these  ribbons  when  they  came  first  to 
be  wore,  was  black.  And  it  is  reported  that  Robert  Earl  of  Essex,  observing  in 
France  the  jewels  of  the  Order  of  St  Micliael  and  St  Esprit  to  be  worn  in  blue 
ribbons,  ordered,  upon  his  return,  those  ribbons  whereat  the  George  hung,  to  be 
exchanged  into  that  colour.  And  in  a  picture  of  Qiiecn  Elizabeth,  drawn  towards 
the  declension  of  her  reign,  her  lesser  George  is  represented  hanging  before  her 
breast  on  a  blue  ribbon.  And  King  James  1.  decreed,  that  for  the  future  tlie  said 
ribbon  should  be  always  of  blue,  and  no  other  colour,  nor  in  time  of  mourning  it- 
self should  it  be  changed.  The  manner  of  wearing  this  ribbon  in  time  oi  peace 
was  pendent  about  the  neck  down  to  the  middle  of  the  breast  whereat  the  lesser 
George  hung ;  but  since,  for  the  more  conveniency  of  riding  and  action,  the  same 
is  spread  over  the  left  shoulder,  and  brought  under  the  right  arm  where  the  jewel 
hangs;  but  where  the  picture  of  the  sovereign  and  knights  companions  are  drawn 
in  armour,  there,  even  to  this  day,  the  George  is  represented  as  fixed  to  a  gold 
chain  instead  of  a  blue  ribbon,  and  not  brought  under  the  right  arm,  as  exhibited 
on  the  three  pound  pieces  of  gold  stamped  at  Oxford  by  King  Charles  I.  1643,  and 
on  a  medal  of  Charles  Count  Palatine  of  the  Rhine,  dated  1645.  '^'^'^  George  of 
King  Charles  II.  was  set  with  fair  diamonds,  and,  after  the  defeat  given  to  the 
Scots  forces  at  Worcester,  was  strangely  preserved  by  Colonel  Blague,  one  of  that 
king's  attendants,  who  resigned  it  for  safety  to  the  wife  of  Mr  Barlow  of  Blarepipe- 
house  in  Staffordshire,  where  he  took  sanctuary;  from  whom  Robert  Mihvard,  Esq. 
received,  and  gave  it  into  the  hands  of  Mr  Isaac  Walton,  (all  loyalists)  and  came 
again  to  Blague's  possession,  then  prisoner  in  the  Tower;  whence  making  his 
escape,  he  restored  it  to  King  Charles  II.  Q^ieen  Elizabeth,  in  the  9th  year  of  her 
reign,  ordained  that  the  knights  companions  should  be  bound  by  oath  to  take  care 
by  their  wills,  that  after  their  decease  all  the  ornaments  which  they  had  received 
should  be  restored — the  robes  to  the  college,  and  the  jewels  to  the  sovereign  that 
gave  them.  Thus  much  as  to  the  original,  ensigns,  and  badges  of  this  noble  or- 
der. And  those  that  are  desirous  to  have  a  fuller  account  thereof  may  have  it  at 
full  length  in  Mr  Ashmole's  Institution  of  the  Garter. 

I  proceed  next  to  speak  of  the  arms  and  seals  peculiar  to  this  order,  and  when 
the  foresaid  symbols  and  badges  came  in  use  and  practice  in  armories  as  an  addi- 
tional ornament  in  adorning  outwardly  the  armorial  shield  of  the  knights  com- 
panions of  this  order.  The  arms  of  St  George  is  ardent,  a  cross  ^«/f.r.  But  though 
it  be  the  constant  practice  of  the  French,  and  other  nations  abroad,  as  also  with 
us  in  North  Britain,  that  the  knights  of  royal  orders  encompass  the  shield  of  their 
arms  with  the  collar  of  their  orders,  yet  the  Knights  of  the  Garter  in  South 
Britain  do  not  make  use  of  the  collar  of  that  order  in  adorning  the  escutcheon  of 
their  arms,  but  only  the  garter,  that  being  by  them  esteemed  its  principal  ensign, 
and  sometimes  having  no  shield  of  arms,  the  void  space  within  the  garter  exhibits 
their  arms.  And  very  observable  is  the  seal  of  Charles  Count  Palatine  of  the 
Rhine,  wherein  is  a  shield,  quarterly,  of  the  Palatinate  and  Bavaria,  obscuring  the 
lion  gardant  its  supporter,  his  four  S  S's  only  appearing  quadrangularly,  and  his 
h'l-ad  a-top,  ensigned  with  an  electoral  crown.  The  shield  is  encircled  both  with- 
in the  garter  and  collar  of  that  order,  and  is  the  first  and  only  example  I  have 
met  with  wherein  both  these  ensigns  are  jointly  together,   though  it  is  very  fre- 

VoL.  II.  3  F 


90  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

quent  to  express  the  collars  of  different  orders  together.  Thus  I  have  seen  the 
arms  of  Robert  Dudley  Earl  of  Leicester  entoured  within  the  garter,  and  a  collar 
of  the  Order  of  St  Michael,  the  Garter,  being  the  ancientest  order,  taking  place 
next  the  shield,  he  having  been  knight  of  both  these  orders.  And  the  abridger  of 
Mr  Ashmole's  History  of  the  Garter,  tells  us,  That  the  funeral  achievement  of  the 
late  James  Duke  of  Hamilton  had  the  garter,  and  collar  of  the  thistle  about  it ; 
but  of  the  irregularity  hereof  I  shall  take  notice  afterwards  when  I  come  to  the 
Order  of  the  Thistle. 

Although  this  ensign  of  the  garter  was  first  designed  in  ornament  to  the  left 
leg,  yet  it  was  not  confined  so  solely  thereto,  but  was  anciently  used  to  encircle  the 
escutcheon  of  St  George's  arms  foresaid,  worn  by  the  sovereign  and  knights  com- 
panions on  their  mantles;  who  within  a  small  space  afterwards  (says  Mr  Ashmole) 
used  it  to  surround  their  own  proper  coats  of  arms,  which  their  successors  have  re- 
tained as  their  peculiar  privilege,  permitting  it  to  none  but  to  their  principal 
officer,  the  prelate  of  the  order.  The  first  example  (says  the  said  author)  that 
occurs  is  that  of  Sir  Francis  Burley,  who  was  beheaded  Anno  Doin.  1388,  where, 
on  his  monument  reared  in  the  north  wall  near  the  choir  of  St  Paul's,  London,  on 
the  front  towards  the  head,  was  depicted  his  own  arms  impaled  with  his  first  wife's, 
set  within  a  garter,  but  another  having  the  same  impalement  (placed  below  the 
feet)  is  surrounded  with  a  collar  of  S  S.  of  the  same  form  with  that  about  his  neck. 
Also  on  the  monument  of  Joan,  wife  of  Ralph  Neville  Earl  of  Westmoreland,  on  the 
south  side  of  the  choir  in  the  Cathedral  of  Lincoln,  bare  the  arms  of  Neville,  im- 
paled with  these  of  Joan  his  wife,  (who  died  Anno  Bom.  1410)  encircled  within  a 
garter,  and  fixed  on  this  lady's  monument,  daughter  of  John  of  Gaunt  Duke  ot 
Lancaster.  There  is  a  collar  of  S  S.  placed  about  the  square,  but  the  paint  being 
faded,  was  rendered  unintelligible.  But  though  these  and  other  antique  instan- 
ces be  advanced  by  this  ingenious  author  to  prove  the  ancient  usage  of  the 
garter's  surrounding  armorial  shields,  yet  are  they  not  so  convincing  documents  as 
to  establish  me  in  the  behef,  that  at  the  times  foresaid  the  garter  really  was  used 
as  an  exterior  ornament  of  the  shield ;  for,  being  but  old  pieces  of  paintings,  it  is 
more  probable  the  same  has  been  done  on  these  monuments  long  after,  at  least  not 
till  after  the  practice  hereof  was  introduced  by  King  Henry  VIII.  And  besides, 
the  said  examples  are  not  good  heraldry :  For  Mr  Sandford  tells  us,  that  no  wife's 
arms  impaled  with  those  of  her  husband  can  regularly  be  surrounded  with  the  gar- 
ter;  as  1  shall  take  notice  of  afterwards. 

King  Henry  VIII.  (according  to  Mr  Sandford,  in  his  Genealogical  History  of 
the  Kings  of  England,  and  other  learned  authors  of  that  kingdom)  was  the  first 
king  of  England  that  introduced  into  his  Great  Seal  the  escutcheon  of  his  arms 
encircled  within  the  garter,  and  ensigned  with  a  crown,  as  may  be  seen  placed  on 
either  side  his  portraiture  sitting  on  his  royal  throne.  Since  him  all  succeeding 
sovereigns  of  this  kingdom  have  borne  their  arms  after  that  manner,  not  only  in 
their  Great  and  Privy  Seals,  but  those  appertaining  to  their  courts  of  justice,  and 
generally  in  all  matters  where  their  arms  were  visible,  except  coins.  In  imitation 
of  whom  the  knights  companions  have  done  the  like.  For  Mr  Sandford,  in  his 
said  History,  tells  us,  that,  towards  the  latter  end  of  that  king's  reign,  the  knights 
of  that  order  caused  their  escutcheons  on  their  stalls  at  Windsor  to  be  encompassed 
with  the  garter,  and  these  that  were  dukes,  marquisses,  and  earls,  had  their  coro- 
nets placed  on  their  shields,  and  hath  been  so  practised  ever  since. 

But  there  were  in  anno  21.  Car.  I.  certain  half-crowns  stamped  in  the  west  ot 
England,  containing  the  sovereign's  arms,  so  encompassed,  regally  crowned  and 
supported,  and  this  was  the  first  money  whereon  the  royal  garter  appeared.  After 
him  King  Charles  II.  having  an  eye  to  the  advancement  of  the  honour  of  this 
order,  caused  the  irradiated  cross  of  St  George,  encompassed  about  with  the  royal 
garter,  to  be  publicly  stamped  in  the  centre  of  his  silver  coin,  struck  upon  the 
recoinage  of  it.  Anno  14.  Car.  11.  there  were  other  medals  heretofore  stamped 
upon  several  occasions,  wherein  the  garter  was  designedly  expressed,  and  inclos- 
ing shields  of  their  arms;  as  that  in  the  year  1619,  when  Frederick  Prince  Pala- 
tine of  the  Rhine  was  crowned  King  of  Bohemia,  and  Robert  Cecil  Earl  of  Salis- 
bury created  Lord  Treasurer,  both  knights  companions  of  this  noble  order.  More- 
over gold  rings  have  been  cast  in  form  of  garters ;  the  ground  on  the  outside  ena- 
2 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  9,; 

uielled  with  a  deep  blue,  thraugh  which  the  golden  letters  of  the  motto  appear- 
ing, set  tliem  oil  with  an  admirable  beauty.  And  it  seems  such  rings  were  in 
vogue,  since  the  preface  to  the  Black  Book  of  the  Order  makes  mention  of  wear- 
ing the  garter  on  the  leg  and  shoulder,  and  sometimes  likewise  subjoins  the  thumb, 
Interdum  pollice  g  est  are. 

It  is  remarkable,  that  besides  the  Sovereign  of  the  Most  Noble  Order  of  tlie  Gar- 
ter, other  princes  of  Christendom  have  assumed  the  bearing  of  St  George  encoun- 
tering the  dragon  m  like  posture  foresaid,  though  not  so  anciently,  nor  upon  the 
same  grounds  and  foundation  as  do  the  knights  of  this  order,  probably  having 
elected  him  patron  and  guardian  of  their  comitries  and  tamilies ;  such  as  the  em- 
perors of  Russia,  the  dukes  of  Mantua,  and  the  counts  Mansfeld  in  Germany,  as 
their  seals  and  coins  plainly  demonstrate.  On  the  Great  Seal  of  Boris,  Federo- 
witz.  Emperor  of  Russia,  to  his  letters  sent  to  Queen  Elizabeth,  dated  at  Moscow, 
June  12,  i6d2,  was  a  double-headed  eagle  displayed,  having  each  head  crowned, 
and  bearing  an  escutcheon  with  the  representation  of  St  George  upon  his  breast. 
There  is  another  of  this  emperor's  seals  fixed  to  his  letter,  dated  May  31st  159+, 
w'hich  he  also  sent  to  Qiieen  Elizabeth  ;  on  the  one  side  is  the  above-said  eagle, 
having  on  his  breast  a  sliield,  charged  with  a  horse  courant ;.  the  reverse  the  figure 
of  St  George  encountering  the  dragon  with  his  spear.  The  Great  Seal  of  Alexis 
Michaelowitz  Emperor  of  Russia,  affixed  to  his  letters  sent  to  King  Charles  II. 
1660,  hath  a  like  eagle  with  a  third  crown  situate  between  the  two  heads,  and  bear- 
ing in  a  cartouch-compartment  upon  his  breast  the  figure  of  St  George:  which 
representation  of  St  George  and  the  dragon  we  find  assigned  for  arms  to  Anna  de 
Russie,  daughter  to  Jarislaus  King  of  Russia  and  Muscovia,  given  in  espousal  to 
Henry  I.  King  of  France,  and  thus  blazoned,  D'un  St  Marthe  de  gueules,  a  un 
homme  a  cheval  c^ argent,  tenant  une  lanc£  en  la  main,  qu'il  en  la  gueule  d'un  dragon 
renverse.  The  counts  of  Mansfeld  have  frequently  stamped  it  on  their  coin;  on 
one  side  is  St  George  encountering  the  dragon  with  his  sword,  with  this  circum- 
scription, Sanct.  Geo.  Co.  Do.  de  Man.;  on  the  reverse  his  arms  circumscribed.  Mon. 
de  Arc.  Co.  Do.  de  Man.  Of  these  of  the  Dukes  of  Mantua  we  may  see  one  of  Vin- 
centius  Duke  of  Mantua  and  Montfenat,  a  Knight  of  the  Order  of  the  Golden 
Fleece,  wherein  is  his  effigies  to  the  breast,  and  round  the  same,  l-^inc.  D.  C.  Dux 
MANT.  III.  MONTSERU,  on  the  reverse  St  George  and  the  dragon ;  motto.  Pro- 
tector nostra  aspic.  1591.  and  Casal  at  the  bottom. 

As  to  the  seal  belonging  to  this  noble  order,  I  find  by  the  statutes  of  King  Ed- 
ward III.  they  were  to  have  a  common  seal.  And  this  is  confirmed  by  the  statutes 
of  King  Henry  V.  and  since  named  the  Great  Seal  of  the  Order.  The  use  of 
this  is  not  only  to  seal  the  original  statutes  appointed  to  remain  perpetually  within 
the  treasury  of  Windsor  College,  as  also  those  copies  of  which  each  knight  com- 
panion is  obliged  to  conserve  one,  but  likewise  all  letters  of  licence  to  any  of  the 
knights  companions  desirous  of  winning  honour  abroad,  and  all  mandates  and  cer- 
tificates relating  to  the  order. 

After  what  order  the  first  seal  was  composed  we  have  no  exact  relation.  Poly- 
dore  Virgil  tells  us,  that  when  the  founder  of  the  order  had  fixed  choice  of  St 
George  for  his  patron,  he  represented  him  armed,  and  mounted  on  a  horse,  bear- 
ing a  silver  shield,  and  thereon  a  red  cross  ;  but  whether  St  George  thus  designed 
was  on  the  real  seal,  or  only  a  scutcheon  of  his  arms,  as  in  latter  times,  is  uncer- 
tain. But  this  author  observes,  that  the  founder  habited  his  soldiers  in  white 
jackets  or  coats,  and  on  their  breasts  and  backs  sewed  red  crosses,  parallel  to  the 
arms  assigned  to  St  George,  as  well  as  to  the  kingdom  of  England,  put  under  his 
patronage;  which  arms  the  sovereigns  of  the  order  have  ever  since  exhibited  in 
their  standards.  But  besides  this  common  seal,  King  Henry  V.  in  the  ninth  year 
of  his  reign,  instituted  a  privy  signet  in  case  the  sovereign  should  be  called  out  of 
the  kingdom  upon  weighty  affairs.  The  intent  thereof  was  to  affix  it  to  all  acts 
passed  by  the  sovereign  beyond  sea,  to  distinguish  them  from  those  of  his  deputies 
to  England.  King  Henry  VlIL's  statutes  ordain  the  making  both  of  a  common 
seal  and  signet,  and  direct  that  the  arms  of  the  order  shall  be  engraven  on  each 
of  them.  The  common  seal  used  in  his  reign  was  a  garter,  within  it  a  shield 
having  the  cross  of  St  George  impaling  the  national  arms;  the  said  shield  encompas- 
sed With  two  branches  hanging  from  the  regal  crown,  which  debruises  part  of  the 


98  EXTERlOx^  ORNAMENTS. 

garter  ;  the  signet  being  designed  after  the  same  manner,  but  less.  In  the  time 
of  King  James  1.  it  suffered  no  alteration,  but  only  in  the  national  arms,  by  ad- 
mitting the  quarterings  of  the  arms  of  Scotland  and  Ireland,  and  new  fashioning 
the  crown,  omitting  the  suspension  of  the  shield.  There  was  a  seal  made  at  the 
beginning  of  the  reign  of  King  Charles  I.  which  being  esteemed  too  little  for  the 
grandeur  and  honour  of  the  sovereign's  commissions,  it  was  afterwards  decreed  in  ;i 
chapter  held  i8th  Aprd,  13th  Charles  1.  that  a  new  one  should  be  made  of  a  larger 
size,  with  the  accustomed  arms  and  motto,  and  the  care  thereof  committed  to  Sir 
Thomas  Rowe,  Chancellor  of  the  Order:  Which  command  he  executed  with  all  due 
care  and  regard,  as  is  manifestly  evident  by  the  nobleness  of  the  design  ;  one  re- 
presentation being  St  George  in  armour,  adorned  with  a  waving  mantle,  his  beaver 
open,  his  helmet  plumed,  holding  a  shield  of  his  arms  in  his  left  hand,  and  striking 
with  a  sword  in  his  right  ;  his  body  mounted  on  a  bold  horse  trampling  a  dra- 
gon whveh  assails  the  champion  ;  the  whole  figure  is  v.'ell  contracted  and  the 
sun  a  rock,  the  bones  of  devoured  men,  and  a  mountain  in  lointain.  On  it  is  cir- 
cumscribed. Magnum  SigUlinn  nobilis  ordinis  garterii,  having  the  enrichments  of 
festoons  between  every  word  placed  pentagonally.  The  other  representation  is  the 
royal  garter  imperially  crowned,  enclosing  a  shield  of  the  arms  of  St  George,  im- 
paling the  sovereign's  arms,  the  same  bordered  with  fret-work  and  other  orna- 
ments in  cartouch.  In  the  same  degree  directions  was  given  also  for  a  new  signet, 
the  former  being  thought  too  big  for  letters.  And  this  was  an  oval  shaped,  as  ap- 
pears from  its  impression,  which  was  the  garter  crowned,  wherein  was  St  George  and 
the  sovereign's  arms  impaled.  And  these  seals  were  appointed  to  be  thenceforth 
borne  before  the  sovereign  in  all  public  assemblies  during  the  celebration  of  St 
George's  feast,  or  in  other  of  its  solemnities,  by  the  Chancellor  of  the  Order,  in  a 
purse  of  blue  velvet;  and  comnvand  was  given  to  the  said  Sir  Thomas  Rowe  to  pro- 
vide one  accordingly.  On  the  foreside  of  which  purse  was  richly  embroidered  (by 
a  goldsmith)  with  Venice  gold  and  silver,  gold  and  silver  purls  and  plates,  and  va- 
riety of  Naples  silks,  the  arms  of  St  George  impaling  the  sovereign's,  surrounded 
with  a  garter  crowned,  having  a  very  fair  ruruiing  work  or  compartment  round 
about  it. 

I  proceed  next  to  the  officers  of  this  noble  order.  The  founder  constituted  a 
Prelate,  Register,  and  Usher,  and  some  of  his  successors  added  the  Chancellor  and 
Garter,  and  all  of  them  sworn  to  be  of  the  council  of  the  order :  Among  these, 
the  Prelate  and  Chancellor  are  usually  nominate  the  principals,  the  other  three 
the  inferior  officers  of  the  order.  The  Prelate  is  the  first  and  previier  officer,  call- 
ed Prelatus  ordinis.  And  William  de  Edington  Bishop  of  Winchester  was  the 
first  prelate;  and  his  successors,  bishops  of  Winchester,  continue  prelates  of  the 
order  to  this  day.  The  privilege  of  this  oificer  is,  that,  in  all  proceedings  and  cere- 
monies of  the  order,  he  is  on  the  right  hand  of  the  chancellor,  and  has  the  privi- 
lege of  marshalling  his  arms  within  the  ennobled  garter  ;  and  accordingly  it  hath 
been  customary  to  surround  them,  impaling  his  see,  and  has  allotted  him  conveni- 
ent apartments  in  the  castle  of  Windsor.  The  Chancellor  was,  by  King  Edward 
IV.  the  i6th  year  of  his  reign,  named  to  be  Richard  Beauchamp,  then  Bishop  of 
Salisbury;  which  office  continues  yet  with  his  successors  bishops  of  Salisbury,  in 
consideration  that  the  chapel  of  St  George  was  within  their  diocese  ;  though  this 
office  was  for  many  years  after  the  Reformation  by  King  Edward  VI.  discontinued, 
restored  again  anno  i66g.  By  the  said  King  Edward  VI. 's  statutes  it  was  or- 
dained, that  the  chancellor  should  wear  about  his  neck  a  cross  of  the  order,  with  a 
red  rose  in  a  white,  of  gold,  all  compassed  within  a  garland  of  red  and  white  roses; 
and  afterwards,  by  Qiieen  Mary,  they  were  allowed  a  golden  rose  inclosed  within 
a  garter,  which  he  and  his  successors,  chancellors  of  the  order,  have  ever  since  worn 
daily  about  their  necks.  At  first  it  was  pendent  in  a  gold  chain,  but  since  in  a 
purple  ribbon;  and  by  a  warrant  of  King  Charles  I.  dated  at  Oxford,  i6th  De- 
cember 1645,  it  was  ordained,  "  That  the  Chancellor,  Sir  James  Palmer,  Knight 
"  and  Baronet,  and  his  successors  chancellors  of  the  order,  should  wear  about 
"  their  necks,  at  all  times,  in  honour  of  the  said  place,  a 'medal  or  jewel  of  gold 
"  enamelled,  with  a  red  rose  (or  such  an  one  as  we,  or  the  rest  of  the  knights  of 
"  the  order,  do,  or  shall  hereafter  wear  in  our  collars  of  the  said  order)  within  a 
"  garter  of  blue  enamelled,  with  this  sentence  inscribed,  Honi  soit  qui  inal  y  pense. 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  ^o 

"  And  in  the  reverse  thereof  he  shall  bear  the  escutcheon  of  St  George,  enamelled 
"  within  a  garter  also,  in  reverence  to  the  order  itself,  which  lie  only  shall  wear 
"  hanging  by  a  light  purple  ribbon,  or  in  a  gold  chain,  as  hath  been  acc  .istomed." 
The  chancellor  of  the  order  is  seated  beneath  the  prelate,  and  in  all  proceedings  and 
sessions  goeth  and  sittcth  on  his  left  hand.  He  hath  also  an  habitation  within  the 
castle  of  Windsor,  and  the  custody  of  tlic  seals  of  the  older  belong  to  him. 

Next  follows  the  Register  of  this  order  ;  and  who  was  the  tirst  we  cannot  dis- 
cover :  but  it  may  be  presumed  they  were  canons  of  Windsor,  because  this  office 
was  at  first  assigned  to  one  of  that  college.  Besides,  the  registers  from  the  reign 
of  King  Henry  V.  to  the  beginning  of  King  Henry  VllL's  reign,  were  all  canons 
of  this  college,  among  whom  was  John  Cunningham,  (and  the  first  found  wa-. 
called  so)  as  the  fragments  of  a  glass  inscription  in  Glare  Church  near  Windsor, 
where  he  was  rector,  attests.  The  first  dean  of  Windsor  constituted  register  of 
the  order,  was  John  Vesey,  anno  8th  Henry  VIII. ;  many  of  whose  successors  in 
this  deanry  have  since  been  admitted  the  rather  as  they  were  canons  tlian  deans 
of  Windsor. 

The  fourth  officer  of  the  order  is  Garter  :  He  wa*  ordained  by  King  Henry  V. 
with  the  consent  of  all  the  knights  companions,  who,  for  the  honour  of  the  order, 
was  pleased  he  should  be  the  principal  officer  within  the  College  of  Arms,  and 
chief  of  the  heralds  :  The  services  enjoined  him,  relating  to  the  order,  were,  in 
preceding  time,  performed  by  the  Windsor  Herald  of  Arms,  an  officer  created 
with  that  title  by  King  Edward  III.  much  about  the  time  of  his  erecting  this  or- 
der. Sir  William  Bruges  was  the  first  created  Garter,  and  called  in  the  institu- 
tion of  his  office,  Jartiere  Roy  d' amies  des  Anglois.  John  Smert,  his  successor,  had 
this  office  conferred  on  him  by  letters  patent,  under  this  title,  Rex  Arviorum  de 
Garteria  ;  and  John  Wryth  was  stiled  Principalis  Heraldus  W  Officiaris  inclyti  or- 
dinis  Garterii  ainwrumq.  Rex  AngUcorum.  But  Sir  Gilbert  Dethick  leaving  our 
Heraidiis,  joined  Principalis  Rex,  which  still  continues.  And  King  Henry  V.  and 
VIII.  declared,  that  he  shall  be  a  gentleman  of  blood  and  arms,  and  a  native  of 
England,  and  that  he  shall  be  chief  of  all  the  officers  of  arms  dependent  upon  the 
crown  of  England.  This  officer  is  appointed  to  bear  a  white  rod  or  sceptre  at  every 
feast  of  St  George,  the  sovereign  being  present,  gilded  at  both  ends,  and  at  the 
top  the  arms  of  the  order  impaling  the  sovereign's  arms  pourtrayed  on  an  oblong 
cube  crowned  ;  but  no  directions  are  given  in  the  constitutions  either  for  this 
crown  or  for  that  ducal  one  on  his  head  wherewith  his  effigies  has  been  represented, 
and  yet  at  all  great  solemnities  is  never  used  that  we  can  discover.  There  was  assign- 
ed him,  by  Queen  Elizabeth,  a  badge  of  gold,  to  be  worn  daily  by  him  and  his 
successors  before  the  breast  in  a  gold  chain  or  ribbon,  and  thereon  enamelled  the 
sovereign's  arms,  crowned  with  an  imperial  crown,  and  both  surrounded  with  the 
garter.  But  Sir  Edward  Walker,  when  made  Garter,  obtained  the  sovereign's 
leave  to  impale  therein  St  George's  arms  with  those  of  the  sovereign's ;  which 
badge  is  alike  on  both  sides.  He  has  a  house  appointed  him  within  Windsor 
Castle,  called  Garter's  Tower,  and  has  of  salary  loo  lib.  per  annum.  His  duty, 
in  general,  is  to  perform,  or  cause  to  be  effected,  all  transactions  whatsoever  the 
sovereign,  prelate,  or  chancellor,  shall  enjoin  him,  in  relation  to  this  most  noble 
order. 

The  fifth  and  last  officer  is  the  Black  Rod,  who  was  instituted  by  the  founder 
King  Edward  III.  For  the  said  king,  in  the  35th  year  of  his  reign,  conferred  on 
WiUam  Whitehorse,  Esq.  for  life,  Officium  hostiarii  capella  Regis  infra  castrum  de 
IVi'idesore,  with  a  fee  of  i2d.  a  day  out  of  his  exchequer.  Anno  3d  Henry  IV. 
this  office  is  called  Officium  virgarii  Comitivtv  de  la  Garter  infra  castrum  Regis  de 
Windesore  :  and  in  anno  ist  Henry  V.  it  is  stiled  Officium  virgarii  sive  ostiarii, 
&-C.  Afterwards  it  hath  the  title,  Officium  virga  bajuli  coram  Rege  ad  festum 
Sancti  Georgii  infra  castrum  Regis  de  IVindesore.  And  ever  since  it  runs  in  the 
patents  by  the  appellation  of  Virgo"  B/ijuhis,  llrgarius,  Nigri-vergifer.  But  in 
the  constitutions  of  his  office  he  hath  the  title  of  Hostiarius.  He  is  also  ordained 
to  be  a  gentleman  of  blood  and  arms,  and  native  within  the  sovereign's  dominions, 
and  if  not  a  knight  before,  he  ought  at  his  admission  to  be  knighted,  and,  for  the 
honour  of  the  'ider,  the  Black  Rod  is  appointed  chief  Usher  of  the  kingdom,  and 
as  he  is  so,  he  is  called  Gentleman-Usher  of  the  Black  Rod.     In  the  reign  of  King 

Vol.  II.  3  G 


100  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

Ch.irlesl.  James  Maxwell,  Esq.  enjoyed  this  office,  and  the  said  king,  at  a  chapter 
held  at  Whitehall  5th  of  November  1629,  decreed  that  the  little  park  of  Windsor 
should  be  conferred  on  the  said  James"  Maxwell  in  right  of  his  o.ffice,  and  so  for 
ever  after  be  annexed  thereto.  And  in  the  reign  of  King  Charles  11.  John  Ayton 
was  Gentleman-Usher  of  the  Black  Rod,  being  both  our  countrymen.  The  en- 
sign and  badge  of  this  office  at  first  was  ordained,  that  he  or  his  deputy  should 
carry  a  black  rod  (whence  he  hath  his  title)  before  the  sovereign  or  his  deputy,  at 
the  feast  of  St  George,  within  the  castle  of  Windsor,  and  at  other  solemnities  and 
chapters  of  the  order,  on  the  top  of  which  there  ought  to  be  set  a  lion  of  England. 
This  rod  serves  instead  of  a  mace,  and  has  the  same  authority  to  apprehend  delin- 
quents, and  such  as  have  offended  against  the  statutes  of  this  noble  order ;  and 
where  he  apprehends  any  one  of  the  order  as  guilty  of  some  crime,  for  which  he 
is  to  be  expelled  the  order,  the  manner  of  it  is  by  touching  them  with  this  black 
rod.  He  has  assigned  him  a  golden  badge,  to  be  openly  worn  in  a  gold  chain  or 
ribbon  before  his  breast,  composed  of  one  of  the  knots,  in  the  collar  of  the  order, 
which  tie  the  roses  together,  and  encompassed  with  a  garter,  being  alike-  on  both 
sides ;  which  was  conferred  on  him  and  his  successors,  by  decree  in  chapter,  held 
the  24th  of  April,  8th  Eliz.  He  has  also  a  house  in  Windsor  Castle.  All  those 
officers  have  particular  mantles  and  pensions  belonging  to  them,  which  the  curious 
will  find  at  large  in  Mr  Ashmole's  Institution  of  the  Garter.  And  though  they 
are  all  strictly  obliged  to  give  personal  attendance  to  their  offices,  yet  in  case 
of  sickness,  absence  out  of  the  kingdom,  or  other  emergent  reasons,  the  sove- 
reign is  pleased  to  dispense  with  them,  and  constitute  others  to  officiate  in  their 
stead,  who,  on  such  occasions,  wear  the  robe  and  badge  of  that  officer  whom 
they  represent,  and  such  deputies  are  sworn  durante  deputatione  y  beneplacito 
Regis. 

By  the  statutes  of  the  order  it  is  provided,  that  none  shall  be  elected  into  the 
order  that  have  not  been  dignified  with  the  title  of  Knight.  Thus  King  Charles  I. 
anno  6th  regni  sui,  designing  to  invest  James  Marquis  of  Hamilton  with  this 
order,  conferred  the  honour  of  knighthood  upon  him  immediately  before  his  no- 
mination :  And  his  father  James  Marquis  of  Hamilton,  when  elected  into  this 
noble  order  by  King  James  I.  the  21st  year  of  his  reign,  the  said  king,  as  a  dis- 
tinguishing mark  of  his  favour,  conferred  the  mantle  of  the  order  upon  him, 
though  a  knight-subject,  which  the  sovereign  very  rarely  bestows  on  any  but 
strangers.  And  when  James  Duke  of  York  came  to  be  elected  on  the  20th 
April,  anno  1 8th  Charles  I.  the  sovereign  confen-ed  knighthood  upon  him  the  day 
before,  which  he  received  upon  his  knees ;  and  in  honour  whereof  four  other 
nobleman  received  the  honour  of  knighthood  at  that  time;  the  Earl  of  Car- 
narvon, the  Lords  George  d'Aubigny,  John  Stewart,  and  Bernard  Stewart,  each 
supported  by  two  knights.  And  thus  Prince  Edward,  Count  Palatine  of  tiie 
Rhine,  and  George  Duke  of  Buckingham,  being  designed  by  King  Charles  II.  to 
be  admitted  into  this  noble  order,  were  both  first  knighted  at  St  Germains  in 
France  1649,  and  afterwards  had  the  ensigns  of  the  order  sent  unto  them  by  the 
hands  of  Sir  Edward  Walker,  Knight-Garter,  who,  in  right  of  his  office,  invested 
them  therewith  :  But  in  foreign  princes  the  want  of  knighthood  becomes  no 
impediment.  It  it  is  also  to  be  observed,  in  regard  that  strangers  elected  into 
this  order  are  for  the  most  part  sovereign  princes,  whose  affairs  oblige  them  to 
abide  in  their  own  dominions,  and  very  rarely  permit  them  to  receive  personal 
installation,  therefore  they  are  allowed  timely  notice  of  their  elections,  and  conve- 
nient time  of  consideration  for  acceptance,  alTording  investiture  in  their  own  coun- 
tries, and  permitting  their  installations  to  be  performed  at  Windsor  by  their 
proxies  or  deputies.  In  pursuance  whereof  it  became  customary  for  the  sovereign, 
when  he  sent  his  letters,  to  send  also,  by  way  of  solemn  embassy,  the  habit  and 
ensign  of  the  order,  with  a  book  of  the  statutes ;  and  in  case  the  election  was  ac- 
cepted, investiture  might  be  received  before  the  return  of  the  persons  by  whom 
the  habit  was  sent.  So  our  King  James  V.  who  was  elected  2o;h  January,  anno 
26th  Henry  VIII.  had  notice  of  his  election  immediately  sent  him  by  the  Lord 
WilUam  H6ward,  who  was  sent  on  that  embassy.  And  the  last  thing  to  be  done 
in  the  installation  of  a  knight  of  this  order,  is  the  setting  up  the  helmet,  crest, 
sword,  banner,  and  plate,  of  the  new  instalkd  knight,  over  his  stall  in  the  Chapel 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  loc 

uf  St  George.  To  describe  the  manner  of  installing  these  knights,  with  the  oatli 
they  take,  and  the  rules  prescribed  them,  being  too  long  ior  this  place,  1  therefore 
again  refer  those  who  dc^ue  it  to  the  said  Mr  Ashmole's  fore-citcd  book,  where 
the  same  may  be  read  at  full  length. 

And  here  1  cannot  omit  to  relate  what  the  ingenious  MrSandford,  in  his  Genea- 
logical History  of  the  Kings  of  England,  tells  us,  and  gives  it  for  a  rule,  that  no 
wife's  arms,  impaled  with  those  of  her  husband's,  can  be  surrounded  with  the  garter, 
and  so  neither  with  the  collar  of  any  other  sovereign  order  ;  for  the  following  rea- 
son. That  though  a  husband  may  give  his  wife  an  equal  share  of  his  escutcheon  and 
hereditary  honours,  bv  impaling  her  arms  with  his  own,  yet  he  cannot  place  them 
so  impaled  within  the  order  of  royal  knighthood,  wlucti  is  but  temporal,  and  which 
1  allow  IS  very  reasonable  :  But  the  garter  or  collar  may  appear  on  that  side  of  the 
escutcheon  where  the  husband's  arms  are  ;  and  as  for  the  instance  given  to  the 
contrary,  that  the  arms  of  Mary  Queen  of  England,  and  those  of  her  husband's 
Philip  K.ing  of  Spain,  were  impaled  in  one  shield,  and  surrounded  with  the  garter, 
is  of  no  force,  for  he  was  one  of  that  order  himself,  and  she  hereditary  sovereign 
and  head  of  the  same  ;  and  all  sovereign  queens  have  their  arms  adorned  as  a 
king. 

Whereas  I  have  spoke  above  of  another  kind  of  collar,  called  a  collar  of  SS's, 
worn  as  badges  of  lower  and  inferior  honour,  it  will  not  be  amiss  to  speak  a  little 
concerning  them.  Wicelius  informs  us,  from  a  book  in  the  library  of  Fulda, 
where  (in  the  life  of  the  two  brothers  Simplicius  and  Faustinus,  both  senators,  and 
who  suffered  martyrdom  under  Dioclesian)  there  is  a  description  of  the  society  of  St 
Simplicius,  consisting  of  noble  personages  in  their  own  families,  and  describing  the 
collar  wore  as  the  badge  of  it,  says  thus  :  "  It  was  the  custom  of  these  persons  to 
"  wear  about  their  necks  silver  collars  composed  of  double  SS's,  which  denotes  the 
"  name  of  St  Simplicius ;  between  these  double  SS's  the  collar  consisted  of  twelve 
"  small  plates  of  silver,  in  which  were  engraven  the  twelve  articles  of  the  Creed, 
"  together  with  a  single  trefoil,  the  image  of  St  Simplicius  hung  at  the  collar,  and 
"  from  it  seven  plates,  representing  the  seven  gifts  of  the  Holy  Ghost.  As  to  the 
"  manner  of  their  martyrdom,  they  were  bound  together  by  the  neck  to  a  stone, 
"  and  thrown  over  the  bridge  into  the  river  Tyber."  At  what  time  the  collar  of 
SS's  came  into  England  is  not  fully  determined  ;  but  it  will  appear  at  least  3C0 
years  since,  and  worn  as  an  ornament  for  women,  as  well  as  men  ;  for  on  a  monu- 
ment in  the  Collegiate  Church  of  Warwick,  the  figure  of  Margaret,  wife  to  Sir  Wil- 
liam Peito,  (said  to  be  interred  temp.  Edward  111.)  hath  a  collar  of  SS's  drawn 
about  and  set  close  to  her  neck  ;  and  the  like  collar  is  about  the  neck  of  Sir  Simon 
Burley's  statute  in  St.  Paul's,  London. 

In  the  ancient  creation  of  an  esquire  in  England  part  of  the  ceremony  was  the 
king's  putting  about  his  neck  a  collar  of  SS's.  But  that  the  golden  one  was  the 
undoubted  badge  of  a  knight,  as  may  be  instanced  by  many  undeniable  examples ; 
and  by  King  Henry  VIII.  it  was  allowed  that  knights  might  publicly  wear  a  gold 
collar  of  SS's,  though  since  it  is  grown  obsolete  and  useless.  And  Eavin  tells  us, 
that  King  Henry  the  V.  of  England  instituted  an  order  surnamed  Knights  of  the 
SS's,  on  the  day  of  the  martyrs  St  Crispin  and  Crispianus  ;  for  though  the  English 
historians  mention  nothing  hereof,  yet  from  the  Chronicle  of  Juvenal  des  Ursins, 
wh?re  he  treats  of  the  battle  of  Agencourt,  the  King  of  England  exhorted  his  men 
to  be  at  peace  and  reconciled  with  one  another,  to  be  civil  in  their  march,  and  do 
their  duty  well ;  and  agreed,  that  those  of  their  company  who  were  not  of  gentle 
extraction  he  would  make  so  from  the  fountain  of  honour,  and  give  them  warrants, 
thnt  for  the  future  they  should  enjoy  the  privileges  the  gentlemen  of  England  had; 
and  to  the  end  they  alight  be  distinguished  from  others,  he  granted  them  leave  to 
wear  a  collar  powdered  with  the  letter  S.  And  to  estublish  this,  and  show  that 
the  said  collar  was  in  much  esteem  in  England,  the  kings  of  England  since  have 
sometimes  been  pictured  with  a  collar  of  SS's  about  their  arms,  in  like  manner  as 
the  garter  doth  now  surround  them,  as  appears  from  an  impression  of  King  Henry 
VIII.  his  privy  signet ;  whereon  his  royal  arms  crowned  are  encircled  with  a  collar 
of  SS's,  to  the  lower  end  of  which  are  affixed  two  portcullisses.  And  our  King 
James  III.  is  pictured  with  a  gold  chain  about  his  neck,  which  I  judge  should  be 


101  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

rather  a  collar  of  SS's,  to  the  lower  end  of  which  hang  pendent  on  his  breast  the 
image  of  St  Andrew,  embracing  his  cross  with  l^oth  his  arras. 

Among  the  variety  of  collars  of  SS's  now  in  vogue,  there  are  these  following: 
The  Lord  Mayor  of  London's  collar  is  composed  of  gold,  having  a  knot  (like  one 
pf  those  that  tie  the  garters  together  in  the  great  collar  of  the  order)  inserted  be- 
tween two  SS's,  and  they  again  situated  between  two  roses,  viz.  a  white  rose  with- 
in a  red,  and  in  the  middle  before  the  breast  a  large  portcullis,  whereat  hangs  a 
most  rich  jewel  set  v»'ith  large  diamonds. 

The  collars  of  the  Lords  Chief  Justices  of  both  the  Benches,  and  of  the  Chief 
Baron  of  the  Exchequer,  are  (in  memory  of  the  said  St  Simplicius,  a  senator,  and 
consequently  a  gown-man)  formed  of  the  letter  S,  and  a  knot  alternately,  having 
u  rose  set  in  that  part  of  it  which  falls  out  to  be  in  the  middle  of  their  breasts, 
and  another  on  their  backs  ;  the  five  flowers  of  those  roses  are  constituted  of  five 
large  pearls. 

Those  collars  which  appertain  to  the  kings  and  heralds  of  arms,  as  well  as  to 
Serjeants  of  arms,  having  been  bestowed  by  former  kings,  and  renewed  to  them 
by  King  Charles  IL  to  be  worn  upon  days  of  solemn  attendance,  are  composed 
of  SS's  linked  together  ;  in  the  middle  of  the  breast  is  a  rose,  at  each  of  which 
hangs  three  small  drops  of  silver ;  but  the  SS's  in  the  collars  worn  by  the  Kings  of 
Anns  are  made  somewhat  larger  than  the  other,  and  in  that  part  lying  on  either 
shoulder  is  a  portcullis  taken  in  between  the  SS's,  which  are  wanting  in  the 
other. 

The  general  difference  of  the  collars  appropriate  to  the  before-named  degrees 
is  this  ;  knights  have  allov/ed  them  collars  gilt,  but  esquires  only  silver;  and  there- 
fore in  the  creating  of  a  herald,  in  part  of  that  ceremony,  he  is  made  an  esquire, 
by  putting  on  him  a  collar  of  SS's  of  silver,  and  so  is  a  Serjeant  at  arms. 

I  think,  and  humbly  give  it  as  my  opinion,  that  those  gentlemen,  while  in  pos- 
session of  these  offices,  may  adorn  exteriorly  their  armorial  shields  with  the  fore- 
said collars,  as  the  symbols  and  badges  of  their  said  offices ;  by  which  after  gene- 
rations may  know  that  they  enjoyed  such  preferments,  and  that  in  imitation  of 
the  knights  companions  of  royal  orders  ;  who,  soon  after  the  sovereigns  of  these  or- 
ders had  introduced  the  practice  of  surrounding  the  escutcheons  of  their  arms  with 
the  collars  of  their  different  orders,  did  the  like  as  to  their  arms  :  And  as  collars 
worn  about  the  neck  distinguish  to  the  present  generation  the  high  rank  or  station 
of  the  person  wearing  it,  so  the  placing  them  round  the  armorial  shield  becomes  a 
cognosce  to  future  generations,  to  certify  them,  that  their  predecessors  enjoyed 
such  high  honour,  place  or  post.  And  it  is  certainly  the  main  design  of  heraldry, 
by  figures  and  symbols,  to  convey  to  after  generations  distinguishing  marks  of  per- 
sons and  families,  and  to  demonstrate  to  posterity  the  several  degrees  of  honour, 
posts,  and  places  deserving  persons  have  enjoyed,  and  were  advanced  to  by  sove- 
reign princes. 

The  next  degree  of  knighthood  in  South  Britain  is  the  Knights  of  the  Bath,  so 
called  from  the  solemn  manner  of  bathing,  and  other  sacred  ceremonies  used  at 
their  creation.  They  are  commonly  made  at  the  coronation  of  a  king  or  queen, 
or  at  the  creation  of  a  Prince  of  Wales,  or  a  duke  of  the  blood  royal ;  some  allege 
they  are  of  no  less  antiquity  than  the  times  of  the  Saxons.  And  though  mention 
he  made  by  W.  of  Malmesbury  of  King  Alfred  making  his  grandson  Athelstane  a 
knight,  he  instances  no  more  than  the  purple  robe,  with  the  sword  and  rich  belt ; 
yet  it  is  apparent  that  when  GeoflVey  of  Anjou,  in  order  to  his  marriage  with 
Maude  the  Empress,  only  daughter  to  King  Henry  the  First  of  England,  was  made 
a  knight  at  Rome,  by  the  same  King  Henry  on  Whitsunday  anno  1227.  It  is  said 
by  John  the  monk  of  Marmonstier,  that  he  with  25  esquires  then  attending  him, 
were  bathed  according  to  the  ancient  custom.  But  Froissart  says,  this  order  was 
first  erected,  anno  1399,  by  King  Henry  IV.  of  England,  who,  to  add  to  the  lustre 
of  his  coronation,  created  46  Knights  of  the  Bath  ;  and  Mr  Selden  thinks  them 
more  ancient.  But  that  great  antiquary  Elias  Ashmole  is  of  opinion,  that  the  said 
king  did  not  constitute,  but  rather  restore  the  ancient  manner  of  making  knights, 
and  judges  them  to  be  really  no  other  than  knights-batchelors;  that  is,  such  as  are 
created  with  those  ceremonies  wherewith  knights-batchelors  were  formerly  created 
by  ecclesiastics.  At  first  view  they  look  like  a  distinct  order  of  knighthood,  but 
2 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  103 

cannot  be  so  accounted,  because  they  have  no  statutes  asiigncJ,  nor  arc  in  case  ot" 
vacancy  supphed,  (the  essentials  of  distinct  orders)  nor  do  they  wear  their  robes 
beyond  the  time  of  that  occasion  upon  whicli  they  were  created,  as  chiefly  the 
coronation  of  a  king  or  queen,  prince,  Duke  of  Yoik,  or  the  like;  and  besides  their 
number  is  uncertain,  and  always  at  the  pleasure  of  the  king.  I'avin  calls  theni 
knights  of  the  crown,  to  distinguish  tliem  from  esquires,  because  they  wore  upon 
their  left  shoulder  an  escutcheon  of  black  silk  eml)roidercd  with  three  crown&  of 
gold  ;  but  herein  he  mistakes,  for  they  never  used  but  only  a  white  silk  lace,  and 
the  jewel  they  wore  was  made  of  gold,  containing  three  crowns,  with  this  motto, 
Triajuncta  in  uno,  hanging  down  under  the  left  arm  at  a  red  or  carnation  ribbon 
worn  cross  the  body.  Benjamin  Smithurst  in  liis  Britain's  Glory,  p.  33,.  calls  them 
Knights  of  the  Holy  Trinity,  from  the  medal  which  they  wear,  which  is  three 
crowns,  with  an  inscription  about  it  which  was  formerly  Tria  nianina Jiiiuta  in  una  : 
But  at  our  K.ing  James  VI.  his  coronation  in  England,  the  word  numina  was  left 
out,  and  so  it  alluded  to  the  three  kingdoms  of  England,  Scotland,  and  Ireland, 
which  were  then  joined  in  one.  They  are  created  with  much  noble  ceremony, 
and  have  had  princes  and  the  prime  of  the  nobility  of  their  fellowship.  The  par- 
ticular manner  of  their  creation  is  mentioned  by  many  authors,  but  most  exactly 
described  and  illustrate  with  figures  of  all  the  ceremonies  by  the  learned  William 
Dugdale,  Esq.  Norroy  King  at  Arms,  in  his  description  of  Warwickshire;  to  which 
laborious  piece  I  refer  the  curious  reader. 

Tliese  knights  are  in  use  to  wear  the  foresaid  badge  for  adorning  of  their  armorial 
shields.  And  Sylvanus  Morgan,  in  his  Sphere  of  Gentry,  lib.  i.  page  82.  has  given 
us  a  figure  of  the  practice  hereof  in  the  arms  of  Sir  Hugh  Ducie,  Knight  of  the 
Bath,  at  the  coronation  of  King  Charles  II.  who  hath  the  escutcheon  of  his  arms 
there  trimmed  with  the  said  ribbon  at  the  back  thereof,  tied  together  with  a  run- 
ning knot  at  the  top  of  the  shield,  and  hanging  down,  extended  so  oval-ways, 
as  the  same  appears  to  surround  not  the  top,  but  only  the  sides  and  feet  of  the 
shield ;  and  to  which  ribbon,  at  the  bottom  is  affixed  pendent  the  said  medal  oval- 
ways,  whereon  is  a  brunch  slipped  with  three  crowns,  issuing  tlierelVom,  one 
at  the  top  and  two  below,  and  round  the  same  the  foresaid  words,  Jriu  juncta  in 
lino. 

This- leads  me  to  the  degree  of  Baronets  in  South  Britain,  who  seem  allied  to 
knighthood,  by  having  granted  them  the  addition  of  Sir  before  their  names  :  But 
this  gives  them  not  the  dignity  of  knighthood  ;  nor  can  they  properly  be  stiled 
knights,  until  they  be  actually  knighted  :  It  is  a  modern  degree  of  honour,  and 
next  to  barons,  whence  the  name  is  also  derived,  being  hereditary  in  the  male  line; 
it  was  instituted  by  King  James  I.  on  the  zzd  day  of  May  161 1,  and  the  9th  year 
of  his  reign  over  Great  Britain.  The  manner  of  creation  is  by  a  patent  under  the 
Great  Seal,  the  form  of  them  being  all  the  same,  vix.  to  a  man  and  the  heirs-male 
of  his  body  lawfully  begotten,  for  ever ;  though  sometimes  the  honour  is  other- 
ways  entailed  for  want  of  issue-male.  The  proem,  or  argument  of  the  said  patent, 
being  for  the  propagating  a  plantation  in  the  province  of  Ulster  in  Ireland,  for 
which  purpose  they  were  ordained;  that  is,  each  of  them  to  maintain  thirty  sol- 
diers in  Ireland  for  three  years,  after  the  rate  of  eightpence  Sterling  per  diem,  to 
each  soldier ;  which  whole  sum  was  paid  into  the  Exchequer  at  once,  upon  pas- 
sing the  patents  under  the  Great  Seal  of  England.  They  have  precedency  before 
all  knights,  except  those  of  the  garter,  bannerets,  and  privy  counsellors,  and  next 
to,  and  immediately  after,  the  younger  sons  of  viscounts  and  barons.  And  as  the 
addition  of  Sir  is  attributed  to  them,  so  the  title  of  Lady  is  to  their  wives ;  and  they 
take  place  among  themselves  according  to  the  priority  of  the  dates  of  their  patents; 
no  honour  is  to  be  created  between  barons  and  baronets.  At  the  first  institution 
of  them  King  James  engaged  that  they  should  not  exceed  two  hundred  in  number; 
and  when  the  said  number  was  completed,  and  any  came  to  be  extinct  for  want  of 
heirs-male,  there  should  be  never  any  more  created  in  their  room  :  However,  a 
commission  was  afterwards  ordered  to  fill  up  the  vacant  places  with  instructions  to 
treat  with  others  that  desired  to  be  admitted  to  the  same  degree,  which  is  now  ob- 
served without  any  limitation ;  with  this  provision,  that  they  be  of  good  reputa- 
tion, and  descended  of  a  grandfather,  at  least,  by  the  father's  side  that  bore  arms, 
and  have  also  a  yearly  revenue  of  L.  looo  per  annum.     The  ground  for  erecting 

Vol.  U.  3  H 


I04 


EXTERIOP.  ORNAZvlENTS. 


this  degree  was  partly  martial ;  for  though  themselves  were  not  enjoined  personal 
service  in  the  wars,  yet,  as  foresaid,  each  baronet  was  to  maintain  thirty  foot  sol 
diers  for  three  years  in  Ireland,  after  the  rate  of  eightpence  a-day,  for  the  defence 
of  that  kingdom,  and  chiefly  to  secure  the  plantation  of  Ulster.  And,  anno  idiz. 
King  James  added  some  new  privileges  and  ornaments  to  them,  viz.  to  knight 
those  already  made  that  were  no  knights,  and  the  heirs  hereafter  of  every  baronet 
should,  at  the  age  of  one  and  twenty  years,  receive  knighthood  ;  also  in  the  king's 
army  royal  they  are  to  have  a  place  near  the  king's  standard,  and  they  are  allowed 
some  particular  solemnities  at  their  funeral;  likewise,  that  all  baronets  might  bear  in 
a  canton  or  in  an  escutcheon,  which  theyplease,  the  arms  of  Ulster,  viz.  in  a  held 
argent,  a  sinister  hand  couped  at  the  wrist,  gules.  Since  the  creation  of  baronets 
in  England,  there  have  been  several  made  after  the  same  manner  in  Ireland. 
There  was  an  intention,  anno  1627,  to  move  his  then  majesty,  that  all  baronets 
and  knights-bachelors  might  wear  ribbons  of  several  colours,  with  some  badge  or 
jewel,  in  such  sort  as  did  the  Knights  of  the  Bath,  to  distinguish  the  one  from  the 
other :  But  that  matter  dropt.  Yet  though  the  same  did  not  succeed  in  England 
and  Ireland,  it  was  allowed  to  the  knights  baronets  in  Scotland,  as  shall  be  proven 
afterwards.  1  come  next  to  treat  on  the  orders  of  knighthood  in  my  own  nation  of 
North  Britain. 

Our  high  and  sovereign  order  of  knighthood  is  the  most  ancient  and  most  noble 
Order  of  the  Thistle,  commonly  called  the  Order  of  St  Andrew,  and  so  called  from 
the  pendant  of  the  order  having  on  a  blue  roundle  the  image  of  St  Andrew.  It 
was  the  custom  and  policy  of  puissant  princes  in  all  ages  to  invite  and  secure  to 
themselves  persons  of  renown ;  and  such  heroic  spirits  were  encouraged  with  marks 
of  honour  to  distinguish  them  from  the  vulgar,  and  amongst  those  persons,  the 
more  eminent,  or  excellent  of  merit  were  placed  in  a  superior  orb,  that 
their  glory  might  be  the  more  splendid  to  the  world  ;  such  were  King  David's 
mighty  men,  the  Satrapae  of  Persia,  the  orders  military  among  the  Romans, 
and  the  many  institutions  of  knighthood  in  Christendom  ;  but  of  all  orders,  purely 
military,  now  extant,  I  must  prefer  this  of  St  Andrew ;  not  only  because  it  is  of 
our  own  nation,  or  that  none  are  commonly  admitted  into  this  order  but  peers, 
but  chiefly  for  the  antiquity  of  it,  which  gives  it  a  place  and  precedency  to  all 
other  orders  now  in  being. 

As  to  the  original  of  this  most  ancient  and  noble  order,  John  Lesly,  Bishop  of 
Ross,  in  his  History  of  Scotland,  tells  us,  it  took  its  beginning  from  a  bright  cross 
in  Heaven,  in  fashion  of  that,  whereon  St  Andrew  the  Apostle  suftered  martyrdom, 
which  appeared  to  Achaius  King  of  Scots,  and  Hungus  King  of  the  Picts,  the 
night  before  the  battle  was  fought  betwixt  them  and  Atheltsane  King  of  England, 
as  they  were  on  their  knees  at  prayer;  when  St  Andrew,  their  tutelary  saint  or  pa- 
tron, is  said  also  to  have  appeared,  and  promised  to  these  kings  that  they  should 
always  be  victorious  when  that  sign  appeared,  and  the  next  day  these  kings  pre- 
vailing over  King  Athelstan  in  battle,  they  went  in  solemn  procession,  barefooted, 
in  a  devout  way  to  the  kirk  of  St  Andrew,  to  return  thanks  to  God  and  his  apos- 
tle for  their  victory,  promising  and  vowing  that  they  and  their  posterity  would 
ever  bear  the  figure  of  that  cross  in  their  ensigns  and  banners ;  the  place  w'here 
this  battle  was  fought  retains  to  this  day  the  name  of  Athelstan's  Ford  in  East 
Lothian.  But  the  Picts  being  afterwards  extinguished  by  the  valour  of  the 
Scots,  they  assumed  the  said  badge.  Now  as  to  the  order  of  the  thistle,  Andrew 
Eavin,  in  his  Theatre  of  Honour  and  Knighthood,  tells  us,  it  was  erected  by  the 
said  Achaius  King  of  Scotland,  who  began  to  reign  in  the  year  of  Christ  787,  on 
account  of  the  famous  league,  offensive  and  defensive  made  between  Achaius  and 
Charlemagne  King  of  France.  But  there  are  some,  says  the  same  author,  that  re- 
fer the  Institution  of  this  Order  of  the  Thistle  to  the  reign  of  Charles  VII.  King 
of  France,  when  the  amity  was  renewed  between  both  kingdoms.  And  lastly, 
others  yet  later  place  its  foundation  anno  1500,  which  too  last  assertions,  if  true, 
would  indeed  give  precedency  to  the  Garter,  the  royal  order  of  England,  before  that 
of  ours  of  tne  Thistle,  seeing  all  judicious  heralds  abroad,  and  the  learned  English 
themselves  are  of  opinion,  that  the  ancientest  order  of  knighthood  takes  place  next 
the  escutcheon,  even  though  other  later  institutions  should  after  become  more  ho- 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  icr, 

iiourablc  ;  and  this  method  has  always  been  practised  hy  all  civilized  nations  that 
esteem  regular  trimming  of  armorial  shields;  as  witness  the  Ujagi;  ni  France,  from 
whom  we  of  Britain  had  the  science  of  heraldry,  and  where  constantly  the  order 
of  St  Michael,  as  being  the  eldest,  takes  place  next  the  shield,  wiien  that  of  the 
Holy  Giiost,  though  more  honourable,  yet  being  of  a  later  date,  doth  both  sur- 
round the  same,  as  I  observed  betore.  And  this  1  judge  has  been  the  only  reason 
why  our  brethren  of  South  Britain  hath  hitherto  denied  our  said  royal  order  its  due 
place  next  the  shield  in  their  trimmings  of  the  sovereign's  arms,  or  tlie  arms  of 
knights  companions  ot  both  the  royal  orders  of  Great  Britain,  as  adjudging  our  or- 
der to  be  of  no  older  standing  than  the  reign  of  the  said  King  Charles  Vll.  King 
of  France,  or  of  our  o\\  n  King  James  V.  of  Scotland  ;  whicii,  if  true,  would  in- 
deed make  the  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Garter  to  be  of  a  much  older  date  tiian 
ours,  and  so  regularly  and  justly  to  claim  precedency.  But  that  the  same  is  en- 
tirely false,  and  our  order  long  prior  to  that,  1  am  hopcfid  to  make  evident  by 
what  follows. 

Albeit  most  of  all  our  historians  agree,  that  the  St  Andrew's  cross,  in  form  of 
a  saltier  argent,  on  a  field  azure,  was  equally  used  by  Huiigus  King  of  the  Picts, 
and  Achaius  King  of  the  Scots,  in  remembrance  of  the  above  notable  victory  ob- 
tained by  tliem  against  Athelstan  King  of  the  Saxons,  as  Menenius  likewise  ob- 
serves in  his  Delitine  ordinum  equestriinn,  page  1646.  Yet  Modius,  in  his  fandects, 
(to  which  Andrew  Favin  assents)  ascribes  the  full  foundation  of  this  order  of 
knighthood  to  Achaius.  Menenius  describes  the  collar  thereof  thus,  "  Cujus  insigne 
"  seu  collare  ex  carduis  confectum  preferunt  gentilitia  reguin  arraa  cuuque,  hoc 
"  addito  elogio.  Nemo  me  impune  lacesset ;"  and  a  little  after,  "  F"uit  autem 
"  huic  militiae  baltheus  aureus  ex  floribus  cardui  orbicellis  aureis,  seu  nodisrubes 
"  centibus  innexi  compositus  &  infra  pfeferens  imaginem  Sancti  Adrete  Martyrii 
."  crucem  decussatam  ante  se  gestantis."  Camerarius,  in  his  Symbols,  is  of  the 
opinion  that  the  motto  belonging  to  the  collar  was  the  same,  which  he  proves 
by  his  having  seen  some  of  the  deeds  of  King  Achaius  amongst  the  records  of 
France. 

Some  think  that  devices  are  as  ancient  as  Antisthenes,  who  gave  Cephisolode,  for 
his  device,  incense  burning,  with  the  words  »ux>.»^i>®-  tuffns,  that  is  to  say,  I  please 
whilst  I  consume.  But  others  think  that  devices  were  no  older  than  Paulus  Jovius; 
and  yet  Petra  Sancta,  lib.  9.  Symbol.  Heroic,  asserts  that  the  thistle  taken  by  Achaius 
King  of  Scots,  when  he  made  his  alliance  with  Charlemagne,  with  the  words, 
Nemo  me  impune  lacesset,  is  the  ancientest  device  now  upon  record,  and  all  praise 
it  as  very  regular  and  pretty.  But  Sir  George  Mackenzie,  in  his  Science  of  Heral- 
dry, page  98.  says,  some  think  it  ought  to  be  lacessit,  because  the  present  time 
shows  best  the  nature  of  the  thing,  yet  lacesset  has  more  of  daring  and  gallan- 
try. In  a  manuscript  under  the  hand  of  Sir  James  Balfour,  sometime  Lyon  King 
of  Arms,  it  is  there  said,  that  the  motto  or  elogium  of  this  order  in  all  seals,  im- 
presses and  inscriptions,  and  by  all  authors,  holds  to  be.  Nemo  me  impune  lacessit, 
and  that,  albeit,  Paulus  Jovius  wrote,  that  Franciscus  Sforza,  Duke  of  iVIilan,  took  for 
his  device  a  greyhound,  with  this  motto,  ^lietum  nemo  impune  lacessit,  yet  Ru- 
celli  the  Italian,  and  Baghliour  maintain,  that  Achaius  king  of  Scotland  was  the 
deviser  of  this  motto.  And  Paradine  says  expressly,  that  Sforza  borrowed  this  only 
from  the  ancient  and  noble  kings  of  Scotland.  And  as  this  eminent  Prince  King 
Achaius  was  one  of  the  number  of  many  others  who  befriended  the  said  Charles  the 
Great  of  France,  in  his  conquests,  for  which  they  and  their  successors  carried  in  their 
ensigns  the  marks  of  that  great  monarch's  favour,  viz.  the  double  tressure  in 
the  armorial  ensigns  of  Scotland,  to  perpetuate  that  memorable  league  begun  by 
Achaius  with  Charles  the  Great,  and  that  order  of  knighthood  called  the  Crown 
Royal,  which  continued  for  many  ages  with  the  Frieslanders,  also  allies  with  Charle- 
magne, who  ordained  for  the  state  of  Friesland  that  the  governor  thereof  should 
make  knights,  by  the  solemnities  of  girding  with  the  sword,  and  striking  the  per- 
sons so  created  on  the  ear,  that  they  should  wear  on  their  breasts  an  imperial 
crown  as  a  badge  of  that  order,  as  Favin  relates.  And  Selden,  in  his  Titles  of  Ho- 
nour, says  the  like,  and  Hancouius  De  rebus  Fris.  gives  the  institution  of  the  order, 
dated  at  Rome  in  the  year  Yoz.  About  which  time,  and  ii  imitation  thereof,  our 
King  Achaius  is  said  to  have  instituted  this  Royal  Order  of  the  Thistle. 


io6  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

Another  instance  of  the  antiquity  of  this  noble  order  as  prior  to  that  of  the 
garter,  is,  that  the  said  Sir  James  Balfour  had  himself  found  among  the  rubbish 
of  the  ruined  abbey  of  the  monastery  of  Scoon  (once  the  theatre  ot  our  ancient 
kings'  inaugurations)  a  record  of  the  coronation  of  King  Alexander  III.  written, 
as  would  appear,  by  the  hand  of  Robert,  then  abbot  of  that  place,  bearing,  that  in 
anno  1249,  the  said  king,  a  child  about  the  age  of  nine  years,  being  about  to  be 
crowned  on  Tuesday  the  7th  of  May  in  the  aforesaid  year,  and  coming  to  the  great 
church,  (the  place  appointed  for  the  coronation)  a  great  contest  arose  amongst 
the  nobility  and  clergy  there.  The  Bishop  of  Dumblane,  Chancellor  of  Scotland, 
and  John  Cuming  Great  Constable,  maintained,  that  the  king  could  not  be  crowned 
that  day,  in  respect  that  he  was  not  then  made  knight  of  the  thistle,  and  there- 
fore could  not  be  head  or  principle  of  the  said  order.  And,  to  avoid  further 
trouble,  willed  them  all  that  the  king's  coronation  should  be  delayed  till  Friday 
thereafter.  And.  on  the  morrow  after,  (says  the  said  record)  they  brought  the  king 
to  the  Great  Hall  of  Scoon,  where  they  put  on  him  oblongam  togam  ex  viridi  holo 
serico  carditis  aureis  ornatum,  on  the  left  shoulder  of  which  (continues  the  record) 
in  campo  ceruleo  imago  divi  Andrea  cum  criice  sua  argentea  depingebatur,  which  is 
all  I  can  find  anent  the  ancient  usage  of  robes  peculiar  to  the  knights  of  this  order, 
our  records  being  either  destroyed  or  carried  off  through  the  many  disorders  that 
happened  in  the  kingdom.  And  our  histories  and  annals  have  made  no  mention 
of  them.  At  this  time  the  Chancellor  did  knight  the  said  king,  the  Great  Con- 
stable girt  the  sword  on  his  left  side,  the  High  Marischal  put  on  his  spurs,  and 
William  Fraser,  Bishop  of  St  Andrews,  administered  the  oath  of  the  order  to  him. 
And  the  usual  oath  administered  to  these  knights,  according  to  Licetus,  a  French- 
man, in  his  book  De  Ceremoniis,  page  74.  was, 

imo,  I  shall  fortify  and  defend  the  Christian  religion,  and  Christ's  most  holy 
evangel  to  the  utmost  of  my  power. 

2rfo,  I  shall  be  loyal  and  true  to  my  Sovereign  Lord  the  King,  and  the  brethren 
of  this  order. 

3</o,  I  shall  maintain  the  honour  and  dignity  of  the  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle 
to  my  last  hour,  if  God  let. 

4;o,  I  shall  never  bear  treason  about  in  my  heart  against  my  Lord  the  King,  but 
shall  discover  the  same  to  him.     So  defend  me  God  and  the  holy  church. 

And  that  the  number  of  knights  of  this  order  was  the  same  of  old  as  now,  is 
clear  from  Fordun's  History,  lib.  13.  where  he  tells  us,  that  this  kmg,  at  his  said 
coronation,  did  make  twelve  knights,  amongst  whom  IValterus  Cuming  Comes  Atho- 
liff,  (Great  Constable)  eques  qmque  creatus  est.  And  Modius,  in  his  Pandects, 
page  107.  says  that  "  Antiqui  Scotorum  reges  solebant  ante  coronationem  duo- 
"  decim  equites  ordine  cardui  creare." 

Another  instance  of  the  antiquity  of  this  noble  order,  before  that  of  the  garter, 
I  find  in  Mr  Sandford's  Genealogical  History  of  the  Kings  of  England,  page  138, 
when  describing  the  seal  of  Edward  I.  King  of  England,  says,  that  in  a  grant  of  he 
marriage  of  Duncan,  son  and  heir  of  Duncan  Earl  of  Fife,  to  Gilbert  de  Clare  Earl 
of  Gloucester  and  Hartford,  dated  at  Berwick,  the  25th  June,  in  the  20th  year  of 
his  reign,  which  was  Anno  Bom.  1291,  he  is  stiled  Edwardus  Dei  Gratia  Rex  Anglia 
$i  Bominus  Hiberniae,  IS  dux  Aquitaniae  IS  superior  Bominus  Regni  Scotiae,  &.c.  in 
cuius  ret  testimonium  has  liter  as  patentes  sigillo  regimini  Scotiae  deputato  fecimus  sigil- 
lari;  the  circumscription  of  which  seal  is  obliterated,  but  the  figure  of  the  cruci- 
fiction  of  St  Andrew,  the  badge  of  this  royal  order  on  the  one  side,  and  the  arms 
of  Scotland,  viz.  a  lion  rampant  within  a  double  tressure,  on  the  reverse,  are  ap- 
parent. 

And  it  was  the  care  of  King  Robert  the  Bruce,  after  he  had  restored  the  sovereignty 
ot  the  kingdom,  and  the  liberties  of  the  subjects  from  the  usurpations  and  tyrannies 
of  the  Kings  Edwards  I.  and  II.  of  England,  to  revive  again  this  royal  order, 
which  had  been  in  disuse  for  some  time,  through  the  wars  and  disorders  happening 
in  the  kingdom  after  the  death  of  the  said  King  Alexander  HI.;  and  this  clearly 
appears  by  that  King  Robert's  charters.  And  particularly  about  the  21st, year 
of  bis  reign,  which  was  Anno  Bom.  1327,  (which  is  still  before  the  Institution  of 
the  Garter)  when  it  is  to  be  observed,  that  some  years  before  that  time,  the  old 
knights  of  this  order,  formerly  made  by  the  said  King  Alexander  III.  were  very 

2 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  107 

presumably  either  dead  or  slain  in  battle  fighting  for  the  relief  of  the  kingdom 
from  slavery.  Before  this  year  of  King  Robert's  reign,  the  most  eminent  of  his 
subjects  are  only  designed  as  other  common  knights,  tnlles,  or  miles  nosta;  whereas 
about  this  time,  and  after  to  distinguish  the  same  men,  being  of  royal  knightiiood, 
from  the  common  kniglits,  they  are  designed  milites  patniie.  Amongst  many 
other  charters,  to  prove  this,  1  shall  give  one  of  this  king's  charters,  taken  out  of 
Haddmgton's  Collection  of  Charters,  now  in  the  Advocates'  Library  at  Edinburgh, 
which  IS  dated  at  Berwick  the  15th  day  of  November,  the  21st  year  of  his  reign, 
confirming  the  charters  of  donations  of  King  Edgar  and  King  David,  and  of 
Patrick  son  of  Waldeve,  Earl  of  March,  to  tlie  church  of  Durham.  "  Testibus 
"  venerabilibus  in  Christo  patribus  Wiliielmo  &  Johanne  Sti.  Andnu  &  Glas- 
"  guensis  ecclesiarum  Dei  gratia  episcopis,  Thoma  Ranulph  Comite  Moravizc, 
"  Domino  vallis  Annandia-  &■  Manniie,  Nepote  nostro,  Patricio  de  Dumbar  Comitc 
"  Marchiic,  Walter  Senescallo  Scotiae,  [acobo  Domino  de  Douglas  &.  Alexander  de 
"  Seton  patrice  militibus;"  whereas  in  charters  before  this,  it  is  said  only  miiitibus, 
as  other  knights,  without  the  addition  of  {patriae)  that  of  their  country.  And  for 
a  further  confirmation  hereof,  there  is  to  be  seen  among  iXlr  Sutherland's  Curious 
CuUection  of  Old  Coins,  now  the  pniperty  of  the  Society  of  Advocates,  and  lodged 
in  their  said  library  at  Edinburgh,  a  piece  of  gold  of  King  Robert  the  Bruce, 
whereon  is  raised  on  one  side  the  figure  of  St  Andrew,  expanded  on  his  saltier 
cross  between  two  flower-de-luces,  and  the  legend  round  the  same  is  Domini/s  pro- 
tector mcus  IjS  liberator  mens,  and  on  the  other  side  are  the  arms  of  Scotland  within 
a  formal  shield  timbred  with  an  open  crown.  And  if  it  had  been  the  custom  of 
these  times  to  adorn  escutcheons  of  arms  with  the  ensigns  of  royal  orders  in  any 
kingdom,  these  of  the  above-named  knights  had  been  trimmed  with  that  of  this 
noble  order,  as  others  of  that  kind  of  later  times  do  by  surrounding  the  shield  of 
arms ;  but  this  method  came  not  in  use  and  practice  for  200  years  after. 

And  now  having,  1  hunbly  think,  convincingly  proven  the  antiquity  of  our 
Noble  Order  the  Thistle  before  that  of  the  Garter,  which  was  but  only  instituted 
in  the  year  of  our  redemption  1350,  then,  generally  and  regularly,  the  first  in  time 
ought  to  be  preferred,  amongst  such  as  are  equal  in  dignity ;  which  is  clear  by  the 
civil  law,  not  only  in  kingdoms,  but  in  all  the  degrees  of  nobility  and  promotions. 
And  this  our  reason  may  teach  us  without  law;  for  if  there  were  not  some  certain 
and  stated  rule  whereby  precedencies  might  be  known,  it  were  impossible  to  evite 
confusion;  and  all  other  lules  except  this  are  uncertain.  And  of  the  same  opinion 
is  the  learned  English  themselves.  For  their  great  antiquary  Elias  Ashmole,  in 
his  Institution  of  the  Garter,  chap.  7.  tells  us.  That  the  older  the  order  is  in  the 
roll  of  antiquity,  whose  chief  ensign  is  now  represented  in  armorial  bearings,  the 
nearer  ought  it  (says  he)  to  be  placed  to  the  escutcheon  of  arms,  being  the  more 
honourable  post.  Now  our  brethren  of  England  come  the  length  to  agree  we  had 
this  royal  order  of  knight  prior  to  theirs,  which  I  judge  they  cannot  deny  from 
what  is  above  said,  yet  at  the  same  time  will  not  allow  our  order  the  precedency  to 
theirs,  in  respect,  say  they,  the  same  was  for  a  long  tract  of  years  after  disused, 
and  became  wholly  extinct,  and  no  mention  to  be  found  anent  it  in  all  our 
histories,  till  King  James  V.  instituted  or  revived,  say  they,  our  Order  of  the 
Thistle,  and  therefore  their  Noble  Order  of  the  Garter  ought  to  have  precedency, 
as  being  a  considerably  older  order.  Now  that  this  king  was  not  the  institutor  of 
our  royal  order,  I  have  already  demonstrated,  and,  if  he  was  but  only  the  reviver 
of  it,  this  saith  nothing  to  the  purpose;  for  in  all  competitions  betwixt  kingdoms, 
states,  or  order?,  w^e  are  not  to  consider  their  present  condition,  but  what  they  were 
formerly;  and  if  they  remain  the  same  that  they  were  in  their  substantials,  in 
that  case  th-  former  precedency  is  still  continued. 

But,  in  my  opinion,  this  our  ancient  and  N>.ble  Order  of  the  Thistle  has  never 
wholly  been  disused  or  laid  aside  by  our  after  succeeding  kings  since  the  days  of 
the  said  King  Robert  the  Bruce,  except  when  the  many  rebellions  and  disturbances 
in  the  nation  might  occasion  the  same  to  be  neglected  for  some  time;  which  in 
some  measure  I  shall  make  apf>ear,  so  far  as  I  have  seen,  from  charters,  coins,  seals, 
and  other  authentic  documents,  though  not  so  fully  as  I  could  wish,  thereby  to  en- 
gage others  of  my  countrymen,  that  have  more  time  and  occasion  to  see  and 
peruse  unquestionable  documents  on  this  head,   that   thev  would  be  pleased  to 

Vol.  II.  3  I 


i:o8  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

oblige  the  world  with  what  they  have   collected  thereanent,  not  only  for  the  ho- 
nour of  our  nation  m  general,  but  that  ot  this  order  in  particular. 

Now  as  King  Robert  1.  had  a  special  regard  for  the  honour  and  flourishing  of 
this  noble  order,  and  received  only  the  noblest  and  gallantest  of  his  subjects  knights 
companions  thereof,  as  may  appear  from  such  of  their  names  as  I  had  occasion  to 
narrate  above,  and  whose  names  are  all  famous  in  the  history  of  that  King's  Life, 
for  their  renowned  acts  of  chivalry  and  gallantry,  so  I  find  King  Robert  11.  has 
not  been  forgetful  of  tiie  same;  for  in  a  gold  coin  of  his,  also  to  be  seen  among  the 
fuiecited  Mr  Sutherland's  Collection  of  Real  Coins,  kept  in  a  box  in  the  said 
Advocates'  Library,  there  is  on  one  side  the  figure  of  St  Andrew  expanded  on  the 
cross  of  his  martyrdom,  and  on  the  reverse  the  arms  of  the  kingdom;  and  no  doubt 
but  in  this  king's  reign  there  have  been  created  new  knights  companions  of  this 
royal  order,  in  room  of  old  ones  deceased,  though  the  iniquity  of  the  times  has 
deprived  us  of  sutlicient  lecords  to  instruct  the  same.  Yet  1  find  King  Robert  IlL 
hath  had  his  knights  companions  of  this  order,  among  whom  I  meet  with  Archi- 
bald, fourth  Earl  of  Douglas,  and  first  Duke  of  Touraine,  Lord  Longueville  and 
Marshal  of  France,  called  Tynman,  not  for  his  cowardice,  being  abundantly  gallant 
and  brave,  but  tor  his  unfortunate  success  in  battle,  being  killed  at  the  unfortunate 
battle  of  Verneuil  in  France,  anno  14:4,  and  interred  in  the  church  of  St  Gratians 
at  Tours,  the  20th  of  August  this  year,  according  to  Sir  James  Balfour  in  his 
Peerage  of  Scotland.  But  Andrew  Fa\  in,  in  his  Theatre  of  Honour,  describing 
the  arms  of  this  Archibald  Earl  of  Douglas,  whom  he  says  was  interred  in  St  Ger- 
mains  de  Preze  at  Paris,  calls  him  Knight  of  the  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle. 
Again  1  find  King  James  II.  retained  high  regard  for  this  noble  order;  for  on  the 
seal  of  Mary,  daughter  of  Arnold  Duke  of  Guelderland,  queen  to  this  king,  ap- 
pended to  several  writs  and  evidents,  particularly  to  a  charter  in  the  lower  Parlia- 
ment House,  granted  by  her  to  Archibald  Abbot  of  Holyroodhouse,  of  an  annual- 
rent  of  twenty  shillings,  payable  out  ot  the  barony  of  Balernock  in  excambion  of 
two  acres  of  land  in  the  territory  of  Broughton,  belonging  to  the  said  abbot  and 
convent,  of  the  date  the  i6th  April  anno  1459,  ^^  ^^'"  ^^^^  a-rms  impaled  with  those 
of  Scotland,  and  placed  in  the  arms  of  an  angel,  whose  head  and  breast  is  above 
the  shield  and  crown,  and  above  the  head  is  a  cross,  and  on  the  breast  below  is 
placed  a  saltier  or  St  Andrew's  cross.  And  King  James  IIL  as  he  commonly  wore 
about  his  neck,  pendent  at  a  gold  chain  on  his  brreast,  the  badge  of  this  order,  as 
may  be  seen  on  all  old  paintings  of  his  effigies,  so  he  had  his  knights  companions  of 
this  order,  among  whom  Sir  James  Balfour,  in  his  said  Peerage  gives  us  the  instance 
of  one,  viz.  William  Sinclair  Earl  of  Orkney,  and  to  prove  which,  he  tells  us,  he  had 
seen  an  old  charter,  about  the  time  of  this  king's  reign,  of  the  lands  of  Roslin  in 
Lothianshire,  given  by  this  Earl  William  to  his  second  son  Oliver  Sinclair,  wherein 
he  stiles  himself  "  Willielmus  de  Sancto  Claro  Dux  de  Oldenburgh,  Comes  Or- 
"  cadiae  &  Cathaniensise,  Dominus  de  Zitland,  Newburgh,  Sinclair,  Dysert,  Rosslin, 
"  Mussilburgh,  &-c.  limitum  onentalium  St  occidentalium  Scotire  prefectus,  Baro 
"  de  Ecford  &-  Cavertoun,  Magnus  Camerarius  &  Admiralus  Scotias,  &-  nobilissi- 
"  morum  Cardui,  St  Michaelis,  &■  Aurei  Velleris  eques."  Neither  is  it  to  be  doubt- 
ed but  this  king's  grandfather,  King  James  L  after  his  releajement  from  captivity 
in  England,  being  bred  at  that  court  from  his  infancy,  and  a  very  polite  and  learn- 
ed prince,  took  occasion  after  his  restoration  to  introduce  many  of  the  deservedly 
commendable  practices  and  customs  of  the  Enghsh  nation.  And  as  their  Order  of 
the  Garter  was  m  high  repute  at  that  time,  so  it  is  presumable  to  think  he  also,  in 
imitation  thereof,  did  his  utmost  to  raise  the  reputation  of  his  own  Order  of 
Knighthood  the  Thistle.  But  however  that  may  be,  I  shall  not  determine,  having 
as  yet  found  no  document  to  instruct  the  same  ;  but  I  find,  and  have  seen,  that  in 
all  paintings  and  sculptures  of  the  efligies  of  said  King  James  111.  and  IV.  to  show 
that  these  kings  were  not  forgetful  to  honour  and  esteem  this  his  sovereign  order 
of  knighthood,  that  of  King  James  111.  is  commonly  drawn  with  a  large  gold  chain 
about  his  neck,  (in  the  same  manner  as  collars  of  royal  orders  of  knighthood  are 
now  usually  worn)  to  which  hang  pendent  on  his  breast  the  image  of  St  Andrew 
embracing  his  saltier  cross  on  his  breast  with  both  his  arms.  And  that  of  King 
James  IV.  is  represented  holding  in  his  hand  a  thistle  of  the  like  figure,  as  the 


EXTERIOR  ORN/UVIENTS. 


ro(> 


same  is  commonly  struck  on  our  copper  coin,  only  it  is  not  ensigned  with  a  crown 
as  on  the  snid  coin. 

And  Balen,  in  his  Maison  de  Montmorency^  lib.  2.  page  3.  affirms,  that  when 
King  James  V.  went  to  France,  anno  1535,  to  marry  Magdalen,  daughter  to  Fran- 
cis 1.  King  of  France,  among  the  tokens  ot  his  love,  during  his  abode  there,  he  be- 
stowed the  Order  of  the  Bur,  (as  he  called  it)  that  is  to  say  tiie  Tiiistlc,  not  only 
on  the  French  king,  who  did  requite  hun  witii  his  Order  of  St  Michael,  but  also  on 
the  CoLint  de  Montmorency,  whom  he  dearly  loved.  And  no  sooner  was  the  badge 
of  the  garter  by  King  Henry  Vlll.  of  England  introduced  to  surround  his  armorial 
shield,  (being  tlie  first  King  of  England  thiit  had  his  arms  so  trimmed,  as  may  be 
seen  on  his  Great  Seal  in  l^lr  Saiidtord's  Genealogical  History)  but  our  said  King 
James  V.  surrounded  his  royal  escutcheon  of  arms  with  his  collar  of  the  thistle, 
which  I  have  seen  having  tiie  pendant  at  it,  being  the  image  of  St  Andrew,  hold- 
ing before  him  his  saltier  cross;  and  sometimes  1  have  observed  the  pendant  to  the 
cjllar  to  be  only  a  blue  oval,  cliarged  with  a  saltier  or  St  Andrew's  cross  argent. 
And  the  reason  why  the  cross  is,  white  in  a  blue  field  is  because  the  cross  appeared 
as  a  flash  of  lightning  in  the  blue  firmament.  And  this  cross  is  a  badge  derived 
to  us  from  the  Picts,  as  1  have  observed  before;  but  now  the  ordinary  pendant  of 
the  collar  of  the  thistle  (which  is  composed  of  thistles,  interwoven  and  linked  with 
sprigs  of  leaves  of  rue,  all  of  gold)  is  on  a  blue  roundel,  or  oval,  the  image  of  St 
Andrew,  his  vesture  of  cloth  of  gold,  with  the  white  cross  of  his  martyrdom  on  his 
breast,  and  in  a  circle  environing  the  figure  beautified  with  pearls,  this  epigraph 
written.  Nemo  me  Impune  lacesset.  But  the  ordinary  and  common  sign  worn  by 
the  knights  of  this  ancient  and  noble  order  is  a  green  ribbon,  whereat  hung  a 
thistle  of  gold,  crowned  with  an  imperial  crown,  within  a  circle  also  of  gold  bear- 
ing the  foresaid  motto.  And  besides,  the  etfigies  of  the  said  King  James  V.  is 
always  drawn  with  the  said  collar  about  his  neck,  with  the  pendant  thereat  hang- 
ing on  his  breast.  Bishop  Lesley,  in  his  History  of  Scotland,  lib.  9.  page  193. 
writeth  that  James  V.  King  of  Scotland,  in  anno  1534.  received  the  Order  of  the 
Golden  Fleece  from  Charles  V.  Emperor,  as  also  that  of  St  Michael  from  Francis  I. 
King  of  France,  anno  1535,  and  that  of  the  Blue  Garter,  anno  1536,  from  Henry  VIII. 
King  of  England  ;  and  111  memory  of  these  orders  received,  keeping  open  court, 
he  solemnized  the  several  feasts  of  St  Andrew  patron  of  the  Golden  Fleece,  of  St 
Michael  of  France,  and  of  St  George  of  England,  that  the  several  princes  might 
know  how  much  he  honoured  their  orders,  and  held  them  in  no  mean  account. 
And  upon  the  same  subject,  he  set  the  arms  of  the  princes  (circled  with  their  or- 
ders) over  the  gate  of  his  palace  at  Linlithgow,  with  the  Order  of  St  Andrew,  the 
particular  order  of  the  monarchs  of  Scotland.  This  author's  own  words  are, 
"  Cujus  rei  ut  luculentius  signum  toti  posteritati  eluceret,  insignia  regia  in  porta 
"  Lithcoensis  palatii  Agenda,  singulaque  ordinum  singulorum,  simul  ac  divi  An- 
"  dreae  ornamenta  (quit  sunt  nostr;^  gentis  propria)  exquisita  artifice  laude  cir- 
"  cumplicanda  curavit."  The  author  of  a  Journey  Through  Scotland,  printed  at 
London  in  octavo  1729,  tells  us,  page  197  That  it  was  in  the  palace  of  Linlithgow 
that  King  James  V.  in  imitation  of  the  Kings  of  England  and  France,  called  a 
chapter  of  the  worthiest  amongst  his  nobility,  and  added  a  collar  of  thyme  and  rue 
to  his  Order  of  St  Andrew,  ordaining  the  thistle  to  be  worn  on  their  mantles,  in 
the  centre  of  the  cross;  and  changed  the  motto  from  En  defence,  to  Nemo  me  im- 
pune lacessit.  But  here  I  take  occasion  to  correct  this  as  a  mistake  of  our  author, 
for  In  defence  was  never  (by  what  1  ever  could  discover)  the  motto  of  this  order, 
but  continues  to  this  day  the  epigraph  peculiar  to  the  royal  crest  of  this  kingdom; 
whereas  the  device  or  ditton  of  Nemo  me,  S*-c.  I  have  shown  above  to  be  of  old  the 
motto  belonging  to  this  Order  of  the  Thistle.  The  said  author  of  a  Journey 
Through  Scotland  continues  to  inform  us.  That  the  said  king  also  ordered  a  throne 
■  and  twelve  stalls  to  be  erected  in  St  Michael's  church  in  this  town  of  Linlithgow, 
for  the  sovereign  and  twelve  knights  of  this  order,  where  their  banners  were  to  be 
hung  up,  as  in  France  and  England :  But  that  king's  sudden  death,  after  the  battle 
of  Solway,  anno  1541  and  the  troubles  that  followed  after  (at  the  time  of  the  re- 
formation, it  was  laid  aside,  being  by  the  reformers  looked  on  as  popery)  which 
put  an  end  to  t^is  king's  noble  vie.vs,  and  indeed  almost  to  the  order  itself,  till 
King  James  VII.  revived  it  in  a  blue  ribbon,  and  Queen  Anne  restored  it  to  the 


no  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

green,  as  I  shall  afterwards  take  notice  of;  but  as  yet  the  knights  (says  the  said: 
author)  have  no  chapel  or  hall  for  their  banners. 

And  1  am  informed,  by  knowing  persons,  that  the  arms  of  the  said  King  James 
V.  on  his  said  palace  of  Linlithgow  (being  never  there  myself)  is  placed  within 
the  collars  of  the  orders  of  St  Andrew,  the  Garter,  and  St  Michael,  every  collar 
taking  place  nearest  the  shield  according  to  the  antiquity  of  its  standing,  which  is 
perfectly  agreeable  to  the  regular  rules  of  heraldry  at  this  day.  And  Mi  Ashmole, 
in  his  Institution  of  the  Garter,  cap.  7.  tells  us,  it  was  a  great  mistake  committed 
in  the  marshalling  these  collars  following,  when  the  Duke  of  Chevereux  affixed  it 
over  his  stall  at  Windsor,  the  collars  of  St  Michael  and  the  Holy  Ghost  are  placed 
nearer  to  his  escutcheon  than  that  of  the  Garter ;  which  was  certainly  wrong, 
seeing  it  is  demonstratively  evident  that  of  the  garter  is  much  older  than  the  other 
two  ;  and  agreeable  hereto,  I  say,  it  was  as  gross  a  mistake  of  the  English  painters, 
who,  (as  narrates  the  continuator  of  Mr  Ashmole's  History  of  the  Garter,  page 
177.)  on  the  funeral  achievement  of  the  late  James  Duke  of  Hamilton,  placed  first 
the  garter  next  his  shield,  and  without  that  a  collar  of  the  thistle  about  it,  his 
Grace  having  been  a  knight  companion  of  both  these  high  orders,  an  honour  very 
rarely  granted  to  any  subject.  Now  our  order,  by  what  1  have  before  related, 
being  proven  by  far  the  oldest  in  time,  certaiuly  it  was  very  irregular  to  place  the 
later  Order  of  the  Garter  within,  when  our  Order  of  the  Thistle,  being  of  greater 
antiquity,  is,  contrary  to  the  rules  of  heraldry,  placed  without,  surrounding  the 
same.  But  1  am  hopeful  the  Earl  Marshal  and  College  of  Heralds  of  South  Bri- 
tain, as  1  doubt  not  but  in  all  their  armorial  decisions  they  make  it  their  chief  care 
to  do  every  thing  relating  to  arms  agreeable  to  the  regular  and  just  rules  of  he- 
raldrv,  and  conformable  to  the  opinions  of  the  best  and  learnedest  heralds  and 
professors  of  this  science  at  home  and  abroad,  so  1  do  not  question  but  they  will 
hereafter  do  us  (their  brethren  of  North  Britain)  exact  justice  in  allowing  our 
most  ancient  and  noble  Order  of  the  Thistle  to  possess  its  due  place  next  our 
sovereign's  royal  shield,  or  next  the  escutcheons  of  such  knights  companions 
as  shall  hereafter  be  honoured  with  both  these  high  sovereign  orders  of  knight- 
hood. 

As  our  said  King  James  V.  was  the  first  of  our  kings  that  surrounded  his  royal 
arms  with  the  collar  of  the  thistle,  so,  in  imitation  of  him,  his  knights  com- 
panions of  this  noble  order  surrounded  their  armorial  shields  with  the  same  collar, 
(as  these  of  the  garter  had  done  in  England,  after  the  example  of  their  King 
Henry  VIII.)  An  instance  whereof  1  have  seen  in  the  arms  of  George  Lord 
Seaton,  vfho  lived  in  this  king's  reign,  and  was  created  by  him  a  knight  com- 
panion of  this  noble  order,  whose  achievement,  as  carved  on  the  lining  of  the  great, 
liall  of  Seaton  house,  yet  to  be  seen,  is  surrounded  with  the  collar  of  this  order, 
and  thereat  hangs  in  a  roundel  the  image  of  St  Andrew  with  his  cross  on  his 
breast,  which  I,  in  the  year  1715,  showed  to  my  Lord  Ilay,  together  with  other 
curiosities  in  this  ancient  house,  with  which  his  Lordship  was  very  well  satisfied, 
and  carried  himself  very  civil  to  the  house  of  Seaton. 

Now  though  the  subjects  of  this  kingdom,  after  the  reformation,  became  so 
zealous  in  their  rehgion  that  they  disregarded  this  high  and  honourable  order  of 
knighthood,  so  as  to  have  no  better  notions  of  it  but  that  it  was  a  dreg  of  popery, 
on  which  head  our  after  sovereigns,  to  avoid  disturbances  in  the  nation,  thought  it 
not  convenient  to  call  a  chapter  thereof;  yet  to  demonstrate  their  regard  for  the 
lionouv  thereof,  and  that  the  memory  of  the  same  might  not  quite  perish,  they 
always,  by  propaling  the  symbols  hereof  in  their  arms  and  coins,  kept  up  the 
remembrance  of  this  royal  order  of  knighthood,  till  the  nation  began  to  enter- 
tain better  thoughts  of  honour,  valour,  and  knighthood,  and  then  King  James  VII. 
did  not  fail  to  call  a  chapter  of  this  noble  order,  as  did  after  him  Queen  Anne,  as 
I  shall  hereafter  narrate  in  its  due  place. 

Thus  the  seal  of  Mary  Queen  of  Scotland,  wife  to  King  Francis  II.  hath  there- 
on the  arms  of  Scotland  impaled  with  those  of  France,  and  surrounded  with  the 
collar  of  the  Royal  Order  of  the  Thistle,  with  the  pendant  of  the  image  of  St 
Andrew  with  his  cross  on  his  breast  thereat,  and  about  the  same  this  legend, 
Maria  Dei  Gratia  Francorum  IS  Scotorum  Regina,  anno  1560  ;  she  had  also  on  many 
of  her  coins  this  order's  badge  of  the  St  Andrew's  cross.     And  the  escutcheon  of 

I 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  iii 

King  James  VI  of  Scotland,  and  I.  of  England,  is  surrounded,  tirst  with  the  collar 
of  the  order  of  St  Andrew,  as  the  ancientest  order,  and  then  with  that  of  the 
garter.  And  likewise,  as  to  King  Charles  1.  the  collars  both  of  the  thistle  and 
garter  were  expressed  in  the  coronation-medal  he  caused  strike  when  he  was 
crowned  in  Scotland  anno  1633.  And  the  royal  achievement  of  King  Charles  II. 
is  also  surrounded  witli  the  Orders  of  St  Andrew  and  of  the  Garter  ;  a  fair  tigure 
whereof  the  curious  may  behold  in  Sir  George.  TVIackenzie's  Science  of  Heraldry, 
in  the  Edinburgh  edition,  1680, yu/.  99. 

As  for  King  James  Vll.  I  shall  here  narrate  a  warrant  by  him  for  a  patent  re- 
viving and  restoring  the  Ancient  and  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle. 


James  Rdx, 

•"  Our  Sovereign  Lord  ordains  a  Letter  Patent  to  be  made  and  past  under  the 
Great  Seal  of  his  ancient  kingdom  of  Scotland,  making  mention,  that  whereas 
his  Majesty's  royal  predecessor  Achaius  King  of  Scots  (of  glorious  memory) 
did  institute  the  Most  Ancient  and  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle,  consisting 
of  the  Sovereign,  and  twelve  Knights-Brethren,  in  allusion  to  our  blessed  Savi- 
our and  his  twelve  Apostles,  and  that  under  the  protection  of  our  blessed  Lady 
and  his  holy  apostle  St  Andrew,  patron  of  Scotland,  the  said  order  being  insti- 
tuted for  the  defence  of  the  Christian  religion,  and  in  commemoration  of  a  signal 
victory  obtained  by  the  said  Achaius  King  of  Scots,  over  Athelstan  King  of 
the  Saxons,  after  a  bloody  battle,  in  the  time  of  which  there  appeared  in  the 
heavens  a  white  cross  in  form  of  that  upon  which  the  apostle  St  Andrew  suf- 
fered martyrdom  ;  by  which  apparition  the  Scots  being  encouraged,  put  their 
enemies  to  flight,  killing  the  said  Athelstan,  with  most  of  his  followers.  And 
it  being  most  certain,  by  the  general  consent  of  ancient  and  modern  historians, 
and  by  several  other  authentic  proofs  and  documents,  and  records  of  that  king- 
dom, that  the  said  Most  Ancient  and  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle  conti- 
tinued  in  great  glory  and  splendour  for  many  hundreds  of  years ;  and  that  seve- 
ral foreign  princes  and  kings  have  been  knights  of  the  said  order,  and  that  the 
same  was  always  had  in  great  respect  and  honour  in  all  places  wherever  Christian 
valour  advanced  the  glory  of  the  cross,  until  the  unfortunate  rebellion  against 
his  Majesty's  royal  great-grandmother  Mary  Queen  of  Scots,  (of  most  pious  and 
glorious  memory)  at  which  time  the  splendour  both  of  church  and  monarchy  fell 
together  into  contempt,  and  the  Most  Noble  Order,  with  all  its  ornaments,  and 
rites,  and  ceremonies,  was  extinguished,  some  of  the  brethren  of  that  order  lay- 
ing the  ensigns  thereof  aside,  and  out  of  a  rebellious  contempt  to  their  then 
sovereign  lady,  his  Majesty's  said  royal  great-grandmother,  and  others  of  them 
forced  to  fly  into  foreign  countries  for  safety  of  their  lives ;  and  w  hereas  the 
succeeding  great  disorders  and  dismal  rebellions,  in  the  reigns  of  his  Majesty's 
royal  predecessors  since  that  time,  hath  hindered  and  diverted  them  from  restor- 
ing the  said  order  to  its  former  ancient  lustre,  his  Majesty  has  now  thought  fit, 
'  as  a  mark  of  royal  favour  and  esteem  of  that  his  ancient  kingdom,  and  of  the 
'  desire  he  hath  to  restore  it  to  its  former  splendour  and   reputation,  considering 

■  the  many  and  seasonable  instances   of  duty  and   affection  it   has  shown  to    his 

■  royal  person,  both  since  his  accession  to  the  crown,  and  in  times  of  his  greatest 

■  difficulties,  hath,  as  a  lasting  mark  of  his  royal  favour,  and  in  remembrance  of 

•  the  nation's  duty  and  affection  unto  him  to  all  succeeding  ages,  thought   fit  at 

•  this  time  to  revive  the  said  order,  of  which  his  Majesty  is  undoubted  and  right- 
'  ful  sovereign  ;  and  doth  hereby  revive  and  restore  the  same  to  its  full  glory, 
'  lustre,  and  magnificency,  as  it  heretofore  was,  with  such  change  and  additions 
'  as  are  already  made,  or  shall  hereafter  be  declared  by  his  Majesty ;  hereby 
'  giving  it  to  twelve  knights,  of  which  (with  his  Majesty  as  sovereign)  the  order 
'  above  named  is  to  consist  in  all  time  coming,  all  honours,  dignities,  titles,  pnvi- 
'  leges,  additions,  and  others,  which  either  have  in  time  past  belonged  to  the 
'  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle,  or  which  his  Majesty  shall  declare  to  belong 
'  thereunto  in  time  coming,  as  an  evident  proof  that  no  dutiful  or  faithful  service 
'  done  by  his  people  shall  be  past  over  without  suitable  return  of  bounty,  honour. 

Vol.  II.  3  K 


[o  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

and  favour  from  him.  And  his  Majesty  ordains  the  said  letter  patent  to  be  past 
under  the  Great  Seal  aforesaid,  per  salttim,  without  passing  any  other  register  or 
seal ;  m  order  whereunto  these  presents  shall  be  to  the  Director  of  his  Majesty's 
Chancellary,  and  their  deputes  for  writing  of  the  same,  and  to  the  Lord  High 
Chancellor,  for  causing  the  Great  Seal  to  be  appended  thereunto,  a  sufficient 
warrant.  Given  at  the  Court  of  Windsor,  the  29th  day  of  May  1687,  and  of 
his  Majesty's  reign  the  third:  year. 


May  it  please  your  Majesty. 

"  These  contain  your  Majesty's  warrant  for  a  letter  patent  to-  be  made  and 
"  past/ifr  saltum,  under  the  Great  Seal  of  your  ancient  kingdom  of  Scotland,. 
"  (for  the  causes  above  specified)  reviving  and  restoring  the  Most  Ancient  and 
"  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle,  in  manner  above  mentioned. 

"    MtLFORT." 


Whi"ch  Patent  or  Diploma,  Pro  restitutione  antiqui  cardui  ordinis  nobilissimi,  is 
dated  at  V\  indsor,  the  iptli  May  id'] ;  but  the  same  being  never  expede  under 
the  Great  Seal,  1  forbear  here  to  narrate  it. 


James  Rex, 

"  Statutes  and  Ordinances  of  the  Most  Ancient  and  Most  Noble  Order  of 
the  Thistle,  revived  and  restored  by  his  Majesty  James  VII.  by  the  grace 
of  God,  King  of  Scotland,  England,  France,  and  Ireland,  Defender  of  the 
Faith,  Sovereign  of  the  said  Most  Noble  Order,  for  the  better  regulating  the 
proceedings  and  solemnities  thereof,  in  all  the  circumstances  thereunto  be- 
longing. 

"  In  the  first  place,  We  think  fit  to  continue  the  ancient  number  of  knights, 
to  wit,  twelve  brethren  with  ourself,  the  Sovereign  of  the  said  Most  Noble  Order, 
in  all  time  coming." 

"  That  the  habits  of  the  sovereign  and  brethren  be  a  doublet  and  trunk-hose  of 
a  cloth  of  silver,  stockings  of  pearl-coloured  silk,  with  white  leather  shoes,  gar- 
ters and  shoe-strings  of  blue  and  silver,  the  breeches  and  sleeves  of  the  doublet 
decently  garnished  with  silver  and  blue  ribbons,  and  surcoat  of  purple  velvet, 
lined  with  white  taffeta,  girt  about  the  middle  with  a  purple  sword-belt,  edged 
with  gold,  and  a  buckle  of  gold,  at  which  a  sword  with  a  gilted  hilt,  whereof 
the  shell  is  to  be  in  form  of  the  badge  of  the  order,  and  the  pommel  in  the  form 
of  a  thistle  in  a  scabbard  of  purple  velvet,  over  which  a  mantle  or  robe  of  green 
velvet,  lined  with  white  taffeta,  with  tassels  of  gold  and  green,  the  whole  robe 
parsemee,  or  powdered  over  with  thistles  of  gold  embroidered ;  upon  the  left 
shoulder  of  which,  in  a  field  of  blue,  St  Andrew  the  apostle  his  image,  bearing 
before  him  the  cross  of  his  martyrdom  of  silver  embroidery.  About  the 
shoulders  is  to  be  borne  the  collar  of  the  order,  consisting  of  thistles  and  sprigs 
of  rue  going  betwixt,  at  the  middle  of  which,  before,  is  to  hang  the  St  Andrew 
in  gold  enamelled,  with  his  gown  green,  and  the  surcoat  purple,  having  before  him 
.  the  cross  of  his  martyrdom  enamelled  white  ;  or  if  of  diamonds,  consisting  of  the 
number  of  thirteen,  just  the  cross  and  feet  of  St  Andrew  resting  upon  a  ground 
of  green,  the  collar  to  be  tied  to  the  shoulders  of  the  robe,  with  a  white  ribbon. 
Upon  their  heads,  in  days  of  solemn  procession  or  feasting,  where  the  sovereign 
himself  is  present,  or  his  commissioner  for  that  effect,  they  are  to  wear  at  these 
times  of  permission  a  cap  of  black  velvet,  faced  up  with  a  border  of  the  same, 
a  little  divided  before,  wide  and  loose  in  the  crown,  having  a  large  plume  of 
white  feathers,  with  a  black  egret  or  heron's  top  in  the  middle  of  it,  the  border 
of  the  cap  adorned  with  jewels ;  the  sovereign's  cap,  for  difference,  to  have  two 
rows  of  diamonds  cross  the  crown  thereof,  in  form  of  a  royal  crown :  the  sove- 
reign's robes  to  be  of  a  length  proportionable  to  his  royal  dignity,  and  the  badge 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  iil 

on  the  shoulder  to  be  adorned  with  pearl,  besides  with  other  distinctions  he 
shall  think  fit  to  appoint. 

"  And  we  having  considered  that  it  was  the  ancient  custom  for  the  sovereign 
and  knights-brethren,  on  their  daily  apparel,  to  wear  the  jewel  of  the  order  in  a 
chain  of  gold  or  precious  stones  ;  and  that  the  use  ot  ribbons  has  been  brought 
in  since  the  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle  was  left  olf,  and  that  chanis  are 
not  now.  in  use,  we  have  therefore  thought  fit  to  appoint  the  jewel  of  the  said 
order  to  be  worn  with  a  purple  blue  ribbon,  watered  or  tabled.  The  jewel  to 
have  on  the  one  side  the  image  of  St  Andrew,  with  the  cross  of  his  martyrdom 
before  him,  enamelled  as  above  said,  or  enriched  witli  precious  stones  on  the 
cross  and  round  about.  On  the  back  of  which  shall  be  enamelled  a  thistle  of  gold 
and  green,  the  flower  reddish,  with  a  motto  written  round  it,  Nemo  me  impune 
lacesset.  The  ground  upon  which  the  thistle  is  to  be  done  shall  be  enamelled 
blue. 

"  Upon  the  left  breast  of  the  coat  and  cloak  shall  be  embroidered  a  badge  of 
proportionable  bigness,  being  St  Andrew's  cross,  of  silver  embroidery,  on  the 
middle  of  which  a  circle  of  gold,  having  the  motto  of  the  order  in  letters  of  blue, 
in  the  middle  whereof  a  thistle  of  gold  upon  a  field  in  blue. 
"  The  order  is  to  have  a  Great  Seal  in  the  custody  of  the  chancellor  thereof,  on 
the  dexter  side  of  the  shield  St  Andrew's  cross,  and  on  the  sinister  thereof  the 
arms  of  Great  Britain,  as  they  are  carried  by  us  in  Scotland,  encircled  with  the 
collar  of  the  order,  with  the  image  of  St  Andrew  hanging  at  it,  with  the  motto 
of  the  order  going  round  the  seal ;  on  the  other  side  the  image  of  St  Andrew , 
bearing  the  cross  before  him,  with  a  glory  round  his  headj  written  round, 
Magnum  sigillum  antiquisumi  et  nobilissimi  ordinis  cardui. 

"  The  Secretary  shall  have  a  mantle  of  blue  satin  lined  with  white,  on  the  left 
shoulder  of  which  the  badge  of  St  Andrew's  cross;  and  upon  days  of  solemnity 
his  ordinary  badge  is  to  be  hung  in  a  chain  of  gold,  being  a  thistle  of  gold,  and 
green  upon  pens  saltier-ways,  with  the  motto  round  about,  and  an  imperial 
crown  upon  the  top. 

"  The  Lyon  shall  have  robes  and  badges-  upon  the  shoulder,  conform  to  the  secre- 
tary, in  his  hand  his  staff  of  office,  and  about  his  neck  his  badge  with  St  An- 
dre A  turned  outward. 

"  The  Usiier,  conform  to  the  secretary  in  all  things,  except  his  badge,  which  is 
to  be  two  sprigs  of  rue  in  form  of  St  Andrew's  cross  vert,  upon  a  ground  white, 
upon  which  a  thistle  of  gold,  and  round  the  motto,  upon  which  an  imperial 
crown,  and  in  his  hand  the  batton  of  his  office. 

"  Before  any  can  be  admitted  to  be  of  the  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle  he 
must  be  a  knight-batchelor.  Here  follows  the  form  of  the  oath  to  be  taken  by 
all  such  as  shall  be  admitted  into  the  order  of  brethren. 

"  First,  I  shall  fortify  and  defend  the  Christian  religion,  and  Christ's  most  holy 
evangel,  to  the  utmost  of  my  power. 

"  Secondly,  I  shall  be  loyal  and  true  to  my  Sovereign  Lord  the  King,  and  the 
brethren  of  this  order. 

"  Thirdly,  I  shall  maintain  the  honour  and  dignity  of  the  Most  Noble  Order  of 
the  Thistle  to  my  best  power,  if  God  let. 

"  Fourthly,  I  shall  never  bear  treason  about  in  my  heart  against  my  Lord  the 
King,  but  shall  discover  the  same.  So  defend  me  God  and  the  holy  church. 
"  The  oath  being  taken  by  the  elect  knights,  before  any  whom  the  sovereign 
shall  appoint,  they  may  actually  wear  the  badges  and  other  ornaments  for  tae 
first  time  ;  and  we  refer  it  to  three  or  more  of  the  knights  first  made  to  draw 
the  forms,  offices,  and  ranks  of  the  officers,  their  fees,  and  all  other  things  that 
may  any  way  concern  the  said  order;  and  humbly  to  offer  the  same  to  our  royal 
consideration,  to  the  end  we  may  signify  our  pleasure  therein  ;  and  in  regard 
we  have  not  as  yet  named  a  person  to  be  chanceller  of  the  said  order,  and  that 
there  is  no  Great  Seal  or  Signet  thereunto  belonging,  we  do  order  that  our  Sig- 
net, now  in  the  custody  of  our  Secretaries  of  State  for  our  ancient  kingdom  of 
Scotland,  shall  serve  for  any  warrants  or  orders  that  we  shall  think  fit  to  grant 
or  emit,  for  noiiiinating  any  of  the  knights-brethren  or  officers,  or  any  other 
thing  relating  to  the  said  order,  until  it  shall  be  fully  settled.     Tne  royal  chapel 


114 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


"  of  our  Palace  of  Holyroodhouse  to  be  the  chapel  of  the  order  in  time  coming, 
"  and  the  sub-prior,  or  dean  or  prior  there,  to  be  reader  of  our  orders,  whose  badge 
"  and  ornaments  shall  be  hereafter  appointed.  Given  under  our  royal  hand  and 
"  signet  at  our  Coiut  of  Windsor  the  29th  May  1687,  and  of  our  reign  the 
"  third  year. 

"  By  His  Majesty's  Command, 

"  Melfor-t." 


Statutes  of  the  Most  Ancient  and  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle. 

"  It  is  statuted  and  ordained  by  the  King's  Most  Excellent  Majesty,  Sovereign, 
of  the  Most  Ancient  and  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle,  that  his  Majesty,  and 
his  royal  successors  sovereigns  thereof,  shall  in  all  time  commg  wear  the  said  or- 
der on  the  ribbon  of  the  Order  ot  the  Thistle,  or  other  way  in  any  manner  his 
Majesty  shall  think  fit.  That  in  honour  to  the  holy  apostle  St  Andrew,  protector 
of  the  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle,  his  Majesty  shall  wear  the  collar  of  that 
order  on  the  day  of  the  feast  of  St  Andrew,  being  the  thirty  day  of  November 
yearly ;  that  the  knights-brethren  shall  wear  their  collars  in  all  collar  days 
wherever  the  sovereign  is,  and  within  Scotland  by  obhgation,  whether  the  so- 
vereign be  there  or  not ;  that  the  collar  days  be  the  same  ordinary  collar  days 
now  observed  by  his  Majesty  ;  that  there  be  a  secretary  of  the  order  to  transmit 
the  sovereign's  orders  to  the  knights  his  brethren,  and  that  he  attend  his  royal 
person  for  that  effect.  Given  under  his  Majesty's  royal  hand  and  signet  at  the 
Court  of  Windsor  the  29th  of  May  1687,  and  of  his  Majesty's  reign  the  third 
year. 

"  By  his  Majestfs  Command, 

"  Melfort." 


The  Sovereign's  Warrant  concerning  the  Ribbon  which  is  to  be  carried.     The  same 
whereon  is  to  hang  the  Medal  of  the  Order. 

"  It  is  our  will  and  pleasure  that  the  ribbon  on  which  is  to  be  hung  the  medal 
"  of  the  Most  Ancient  and  Most  noble  Order  of  the  Thistle,  be  of  the  colour  and 
"  watering  of  the  pattern  hereunto  annexed,,  as  well  when  the  same  shall  be  carri- 
"  ed  by  us  the  sovereign,  as  it  is  to  be  daily  by  the  knights-brethren  of  the  said 
"  order.  Given  under  our  royal  hand  and  Signet  at  our  Court  of  Windsor  the 
"  31st  day  of  May  1687,  and  of  our  reign  the  third  year. 
"  By  his  Majestfs  special  Command, 

"  Melfort." 


Commission  to  Sir  Andrew  Forrester  to  be  his  Majestfs  Secretary  of  the  Most  An- 
cient and  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle. . 

James  Rex, 

"  James  VII.  by  the  grace  of  God,  King  of  Scotland,  England,  France,  and 
"  Ireland,  Defender  of  the  Faith,  &.c.  Sovereign  of  the  Most  Ancient  and  Most 
"  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle.  To  our  trusty  and  well  beloved  Sir  Andrew  Forrester, 
"  Greeting.  Whereas  we  have  thought  fit  to  revive  and  restore  the  said  Most  An- 
"  cient  and  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle  to  its  ancient  splendour  and  magnili- 
"  cence,  to  the  end  it  may  remain  as  a  lasting  mark  and  testimony  of  our  royal 
"  favour  to  our  ancient  kingdom  of  Scotland ;  and  whereas  several  officers  are  need- 
"  ful  for  attending  the  service  of  the  same,  especially  a  secretary  for  giving  an  ac- 
"  count  of  our  intention  and  pleasure  from  time  to  time  to  the  knights-brethren  of 
"  the  said  order,  we  have  therefore  thought  fit  to  nominate,  constitute,  and  ap- 
"  point  you  the  said  Sir  Andrew  Forrester  to  be  our  secretary  of  that  Most  Ancient 
"  and  Most  Noble  Order,  giving,  granting,  and  disponing  unto  you  the  place  and 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS .  115 

office  of  our  secretary  of  the  order  aforesaid,  witli  all  power  and  authority  to  you 
to  receive  all  fees,  prolits,  and  perquisites,  and  to  enjoy  all  privileges  and  immu- 
nities belonging,  or  that  hereafter  shall  be  by  us  declared  to  pertain  and  b^-long 
to  the  same,  and  generally  with  full  power  to  do  and  perform  all  thiugi  per- 
taining to  the  place,  office,  and  duty  of  secretary  of  that  order,  and  after  you 
have  taken  your  oath  de  fideli  miininistratione  in  the  said  office,  you  are  hereby 
authorised  to  carry  a  badge,  and  to  wear  and  use  all  habits  and  distinctions,  and 
others  which  to  our  secretary  of  the  said  order  do  rightly  belong ;  for  all  which 
this  shall  be  your  warrant.  Given  under  our  royal  hand  at  our  Court  at  Wind- 
sor, the  31st  day  of  May  16S7,  and  of  our  reign  the  third  year. 
"  By  bis  Majesty's  Ojmmn/id, 

"  Melfort." 


J.i^MES  Rex, 

The  form  of  the  Oath  taken  by  bis  Majesty's  Secretary  of  the  Most  Ancient  and  Most 
Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle. 

"  I  shall  bear  faith  and   true  allegiance  to  my  Sovereign  Lord  the  King's  most 

"  excellent  Majesty,  Sovereign  of  the  Most  Ancient  and  Most  Noble  Order  of  the 

"  Thistle,  I  shall  faithfully  perform  the  duty  of  secretary  to  the  said  most  noble 

"  order,  and  will  never  reveal  the  secrets  of  the  same.     I  will  be  true  and  faithful 

"  to  the  knights-brethren  of  the  said  order,     i  will  (to  the   utmost  of  my  power) 

"  maintain  the  honours,  rights  and  privileges  of  the  said  most  ancient  and  most 

"  noble  order.     So  help  me  God."     • 

Windsor,  ^ist  May  1687. 

"  Nota,  That  hereafter  there  are  no  papers  relating  to  the  order  to  be  recorded 
"  in  the  Principal  Secretaries  of  State  their  office,  in  regard  his  Majesty's 
"  Secretary  of  the  order  is  to  keep  a  register  apart  in  which  they  are  to  be  re- 
"  corded." 


Follows  the  List  of  the  Knights  Companions  of  the  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle  revived 
in  the  Reign  of  King  James  VU.  and  created  so  by  bini. 

James  Earl  of  Perth,  then  Lord  High  Chancellor  of  Scotland,  George  Duke  of 
Gordon,  John  Marquis  of  Athol  Lord  Privy  Seal,  James  Earl  of  Arran,  after  Duke 
of  Hamilton,  Alexander  Earl  of  Murray,  John  Earl  of  Melfort,  then  Principal  Secre- 
tary of  State,  Kenneth  Earl  of  Seaforth,  George  Earl  of  Dumbarton,  Sir  Andrew 
Forrester,  Secretary  to  the  Order, Usher  of  the  Thistle. 

Thus  this  Most  Ancient  and  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle  continued  to 
flourish  during  the  remainder  of  this  king's  reign.  But  the  Revolution  afterwards 
succeeding,  which  occasioned  the  said  King  James  to  retire  to  France,  and  the 
Prince  of  Orange  being  in  his  place  crowned  king  of  these  realms  by  the  revolu- 
tioners,  they  laid  again  aside  the  usage  of  this  noble  order,  and  their  zeal  for  the 
Protestant  religion  occasioned  them  to  have  no  juster  sentiments  of  it  than  our  old 
reformers  had,  who  esteemed  no  better  of  this  high  order  of  knighthood  than  that 
it  was  a  popish  institution.  For  as  the  said  Prince  of  Orange  was  a  liero  of  un- 
questionable bravery,  so  he  had  a_great  esteem  of  knighthood  and  valour,  as  may 
appear  from  his  creating  as  many  Knights  of  the  Garter  as  has  been  done  in  any 
succeeding  reign  since  ;  neither  is  it  to  be  doubted  but  he  would  have  given  as 
much  encouragement  to  the  honour,  splendour,  and  reputation  of  our  said  royal  or- 
der of  knighthood  during  his  reign  as  any  of  our  preceding  kings  had  done,  had 
he  found  the  humour  of  our  nation  to  have  laid  aside  all  their  prejudices  thereto, 
and  agreed  with  his  just  sentiments  of  honour:  And  therefore  to  give  our  said  na- 
tion no  occasion  of  discontent  during  his  government,  he  thought  it  proper  to  lav 

Vol.  U.  3  L 


,iG  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

aside  the  usage  of  this  most  ancient  and  most   noble  order;  so   that  no  creation  of 
any  hlw  knights  thereof  happened  during  his  reign. 

But  his  successor,  Queen  Anne,  finding  this  kingdom  begin  to  have  better  con- 
ceptions of  the  great  honour  of  royal  knighthood,  she  was  pleased,  in  the  second 
year  qf  her  reign,  to  sign  a  patent  to  be  passed  the  Great  Seal  of  Scotland,  for 
again  reviving  and  restoring  our  Most  Ancient  and  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle, 
whereof  the  tenor  follows  : 

"  Anna,  Dei  Gratia,  Scotias,  Anglias,  Francia:  &-  Hibernias  Regina,  fideique  de- 
"  fensor,  omnibus  probis  hominibus ;  quandoquidem  serenissimus  noster  progenitor 
"  Scotorum  Rex  Acbauis  gloriosDE  memorice,  ordinem  cardui  antiquum,  ac  longe 
"  nobilissimum,  ex  suinmo  principe  &  duodecim  equitibus  constantem  instituisse; 
"  idque  ad  Christianee  religionis  tutelam,  &-  in  memoriam  insignis  victoria  per 
"  e.indem  ad  versus  Athelstanum  Saxonum  regem,  post  prselium  cruentum  parte 
"  ubi  dum  pugnaretur,  in  aethere  apparuit  crux  alba  decussata  ad  formam  illius  qua 
"  Sanctus  Andreas  Apostolus  martyrium  passus  est,  qui  quidem  antiquissimus  &• 
•'  nobihssimus  ordo,  non  solum  jn  archivis  nostris,  &  hujus  regni  nostri  Scotiae  his- 
"  toriis,  sed  etiam  ab  exteris  historiarum  scriptoribus,  honoritice  commemoratur ; 
"  qua;  sunt  authentica  documenta  prselustris  estimationis  ejus  nobihssimi  ordinis 
"  generatim  susceptae,  sed  ob  continuata  bella  &-  tumultus  intestinos  quae  post  obi- 
"  tum  Jacobi  Quinti  Regis  successivas  minoritates  regiae  coronae  splendor,  huic 
"  multis  in  rebus  diversique  modus  obumbratus  fuit  &-  inter  alia  honos  huic  nobilis- 
"  simae  institutioni  debitus,  quaeque  sic  praestitit,  usque  ad  tertium  annum  regni 
"  regis  nostri  patris  Jacobi  Septimi,  qui  consideratione  multiplicium  ofBcii,  &•  afFec- 
"  tionis  judiciorum  ipsi  exhibitorum,  per  hoc,  antiquum  regnum  nostrum,  eundem 
"  nobilissimum  ordinem  redintegravit  &  restituit,  &-  ob  ejusdem  restitutionem,  nos 
"  inter  multa  alia  testimonia  curas  nostrae  regiae  antiqui  hujus  regni  nostri,  tam 
"  pro  ejusdem  honore  quam  aliis  quae  ad  idem  spectant,  &  predicti  nobilissimi  or- 
"  dinis  ad  justum  splendorem  £*-  existimationem  erectione,  eo  ut  presens  hoc  nos- 
"  trum  seculum  atque  aetates  futurae  ad  emidationem  nobilem  talia  gratiae  regia 
"  signa  discriminantia  merendi,  in  suorum  nobilium  antecessorum  imitationem  ex- 
"  citentur  ac  moventur,  congruum  nos  nunc  putamus  tanquam  princeps  suprema 
"  dicti  nobilissimi  ordinis  indubitatum  nostrum  jus  exequi.  Noveritis  igitur  nos 
"  redintegrasse  &.  restituisse,  sicuti  per  presentes  has  literas  nostras  patentes  redin- 
"  tegvamus  &-  restituimus,  eundem  dictum  ordinem,  ad  cranes  honores,  dignitates, 
"  titulos  &-  privilegia,  quae  olim  aut  nunc  ad  eundem  pertinentem,  cum  omnibus 
"  aliis  additamentis,  quae  nos  aut  nostri  regii  successores  supremi  principes  dicti 
"  nobilissimi  ordinis,  in  posterum  declanivimus,  vel  in  eos  conferemus,  atque  per 
"  presentes  has  literas  nostras  patentes  duodecim  equitibus  nobiscum  supremo 
"  principe  ex  quibus  prasdictus  nobilissimus  ordo  tempore  elapso  constitit,  atque 
"  in  posterum  constabit,  &  successoribus  suis  in  dicto  ordine  damns  &-  concedi- 
"  nius  omnes  honores,  dignitates,  titulos  &-  privilegia  ad  plenum  suum  vigorem, 
"  gloriam,  &•  magnificentiam,  prout  hactenus  obtinuit,  vel  quae  in  futurum  ad 
"  eundem  pertinere  declaravimus.  In  cujus  rei  testimonium  magnum  sigillum 
"  nostrum  appendi  prsecepimus.  Datum  apud  aulam  nostram  de  St  James,  tri- 
"  gesimo  primo  die  mensis  Decembris,  Anno  Domini  millesimo  septingentesimo 
"  quarto,  &  anno  regni  nostri  secundo. 

"  Anne  R." 


Statutes  and  Orders  of  the  Most  Ancient  and  Most  Noble  Order  of  the 
Xhistle,  revived  hy  her  Majesty  Anne,  by  the  Grace  of  God,  ^ecn 
Locus  SiGiLLi.  of  Scotland,  England,  France  and  Ireland,  Defender  of  the  Faith, 
Sovereign  of  the  said  Most  Noble  Order,  for  the  better  regulating  the 
proceedings  and  solemtiities  thereof  in  all  the  circumstances  thereunto 
belonging. 

"  In  Xht  first  place.  We  think  fit  to  continue  the  ancient  number  of  knights,  to 
"  wit,  twelve  brethren  with  ourself  the  sovereign  of  the  said  most  noble  order,  to 
"  be  the  precise  number  of  that  order  in  all  time  coming. 

"  That  the  sovereign's  habit  be  such  as  they  shall  think  fit  at  any  time  here- 


EXTEPdOR  ORNAMENTS.  117 

after  to  appoint.  That  the  habit  of  brethren  of  this  order  be  a  doublet  and 
trunk-liose  of  cloth  of  silver,  stockings  of  pearl-coloured  silk,  with  white  leather 
shoes,  garters  and  shoe-strings  of  green  and  silver,  the  breeches  and  sleeves  of 
tiie  doublet  decently  garnislied  with  silver  and  green  ribbons,  a  surcoat  of  purple 
velvet  lined  with  white  talfera,  girt  about  the  middle  with  a  purple  sword-belt 
edged  with  gold,  and  a  buckle  of  gold,  at  which  a  sword  with  a  gilded  hilt,  where- 
of the  shell  is  to  be  in  the  form  of  the  badge  of  the  order,  and  the  pommel  in 
the  form  of  a  thistle,  in  a  scabbard  of  purple  velvet,  over  all  which  a  mantle  or 
robe  of  green  velvet,  lined  with  white  taffeta,  with  tassels  of  gold  and  gi\en  ; 
upon  the  left  shoulder  of  which,  in  a  field  of  green,  St  Andrew  the  apostle  his 
image,  bearing  before  him  the  cross  of  his  martyrdom  of  silver  embroidery,  with 
a  circle  of  gold  round  it,  upon  which  the  motto.  Nemo  me  hnpune  lacesset,  in 
letters  of  green  ;  and  at  the  lower  part  of  it  a  thistle  of  gold  and  green,  the 
flower  reddish;  about  the  shoulder  is  to  be  worn  the  collar  of  the  order,  consisting 
of  thistles  and  sprigs  of  rue  going  betwixt ;  at  the  middle  of  w  hich  before  is  to 
be  hung  the  St  Andrew-  of  gold  enamelled  white,  or  if  of  diamonds,  consisting 
of  the  number  of  thirteen  just,  the  cross  and  feet  of  St  Andrew  resting  upon  a 
ground  of  green,  the  collar  to  be  tied  to  the  shoulders  of  the  robe,  and  white 
ribbons  upon  their  heads,  on  days  of  solemn  procession  or  feasting,  where  the  so- 
vereign is  present,  or  has  a  commissioner  for  that  effect.  They  are  to  wear  at 
the  times  of  permission  a  cap  of  black  velvet  faced  up  with  a  border  of  the 
same,  a  httle  divided  before,  wide  and  loose  in  the  crown,  having  a  large  plume 
of  white  feathers,  with  a  black  egrit  or  heron's  top  in  the  middle  of  it,  the  bor- 
ders of  the  cap  adorned  with  jewels. 

"  That  the  jewel  of  the  said  order  is  to  be  worn  at  a  green  ribbon  over  the  left 
shoulder,  cross  the  body  and  tied  under  the  right  arm.  The  jewel  to  have  on 
the  one  side  the  image  of  St  Andrew,  with  the  cross  before  enaroelled,  as  is  above 
said,  or  cut  on  stone,  enriched  with  precious  stones  round  it,  on  the  back  of 
which  shall  be  enamelled  a  thistle  gold  and  green,  the  flower  reddish,  with  the 
before-mentioned  motto  round  it.  The  ground  upon  which  the  thistle  is  to  be 
done  shall  be  enamelled  green. 

"  That  the  medal  of  the  order  be  all  of  gold,  being  the  St  Andrew,  bearing  be- 
fore him  the  cross  of  his  martyrdom,  with  a  circle  round,  on  which  to  be  the 
motto  of  the  order,  and  at  the  lower  part  of  the  circle  between  the  joining  of  the 
words  a  thistle,  and  to  be  worn  in  a  green  ribbon  as  the  jewel,  at  times  when 
the  jewel  is  not  worn. 

"  That  upon  the  left  breast  of  the  coat  and  cloak  shall  be  embroidered  a  badge 
of  a  proportionable  bigness,  being  a  St  Andrew's  cross  of  silver  embroidery,  with 
rays  going  out  betwixt  the  points  of  the  cross,  on  the  middle  of  which  a  thistle 
of  gold  and  green  upon  a  field  of  green,  and  round  the  thistle  and  field  a 
circle  of  gold,  having  on  it  the  motto  of  the  order  in  letters  of  green. 
"  That  her  Majesty,  and  her  royal  successore,  sovereigns  of  the  said  Most  An- 
cient and  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle,  shall  in  all  time  coming  wear  the 
said  order  on  the  ribbon  of  the  Order  of  the  Garter,  or  otherwise  in  any  manner 
that  her  Majesty  shall  think  fit,  and  shall  wear  the  collar  of  the  said  order  on  the 
day  of  the  feast  of  St  Andrew,  being  the  thirtieth  of  November  yearly. 
"  That  the  knights-brethren  of  the  said  order  shall  wear  their  collars  on  all  col- 
lar days,  wherever  the  sovereign  is,  and  within  Scotland,  by  obligation,  upon 
all  days  of  public  solemnities,  whether  the  sovereign  be  there  or  not. 
"  That  the  collar  days  be  the  same  ordinary  collar  days  now  observed  by  her 
Majesty.  That  the  collar  with  the  St  Andrew  belonging  to  it,  and  the  medal 
of  the  order  given  by  her  Majesty  and  successors,  sovereigns  of  the  said  most 
noble  order,  to  the  knights-brethren  thereof  at  their  admission,  be  returned  at 
their  deaths  to  the  sovereign. 

"  The  order  is  to  have  a  Great  Seal  in  the  custody  of  the  Chancellor  thereof, 
having  on  the  dexter  side  St  Andrew's  cross,  and  on  the  sinister  the  arms  of 
Great  Britain,  as  they  are  carried  by  us  in  Scotland,  encircled  with  the  collar  of 
the  order,  with  the  image  of  St  Andrew  hanging  at  it,  with  the  motto  of  the 
order  going  round  the  seal.     On  the  other  side,  the  image  of  St  Andrew,  bearing 


ii8  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

"  a  cross  before  him,  with  a  glory  round  his  head,  written  round  Magnum  sigillum 
"  antiquissimi  £5"  nobilissimi  ordinis  cardui." 

"  That  there  be  a  Secretary  of  the  order  to  transmit  the  sovereign's  orders  to 
"  the  knights-brethren,  and  that  he  attend  her  royal  person  for  that  effect.  He 
"  shall  have,  on  days  of  solemnity,  a  mantle  of  green  satin,  lined  with  white  on 
"  the  left  shoulder,  of  which  the  badge  of  St  Andrew's  cross,  his  ordinary  badge, 
"  is  to  be  hung  in  a  chain  of  gold,  being  a  thistle  of  gold  and  green,  upon  two 
"  pens  crossed  saltier- ways,  with  the  motto  round  about  it,  and  an  imperial  crown 
"  upon  the  top." 

"  The  Lyon  shall  have  robes  and  badges  upon  the  shoulder,  conform  to  the  se- 
"  cretary,  in  his  hand  his  staff  of  office,  and  about  his  neck  his  badge,  with  the  St 
"  Andrew  turned  outward. 

"  The  Usher  conform  to  the  secretary  in  all  things,  except  his  badge,  which  is 
"  to  be  two  sprigs  of  rue  in  form  of  St  Andrew's  cross  vert,  upon  a  ground  white, 
"  upon  which  a  thistle  of  gold,  and  round  the  motto,  upon  which  an  imperial 
"  crown,  and  in  his  hand  the  batton  of  his  office. 

"  Before  any  can  be  admitted  to  the  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle,  he  must 
"  be  a  knight-batchelor." 

Here  follows  the  Form  of  the  Oath  to  be  taken  by  all  such  as  shall  be  admitted  into 
this  Order  as  Brethren. 


"  I shall  fortify  and  defend  the  true  reformed  Protestant  religion, 

and  Christ's  most  holy  evangel,  to  the  utmost  of  my  power. 
"  I  shall  be  loyal  and  true  to  my  Sovereign  Lady  the  Queen,  Sovereign  of  this 
Most  Ancient  and  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle. 

"  I  shall  maintain  and  defend  the  statutes,  privileges,  and  honours  of  the  said 
order. 

"  I  shall  never  bear  any  treason  about  in  my  heart  against  our  Sovereign  Lady 
the  Queen,  but  shall  discover  the  same  to  her.  So  help  me  God. 
"  The  oath  being  taken  by  the  elect  knights,  before  any  whom  the  sovereign 
shall  appoint,  they  may  actually  wear  the  badge  and  other  ornaments  belonging 
to  the  order;  and  in  regard  we  have  not  as  yet  named  a  person  to  be  chancellor 
of  the  said  order,  and  that  there  is  no  Great  Seal  belonging  thereto,  we  do  there- 
fore ordain  that  our  signet  of  the  said  order,  which  is  to  be  in  the  custody  of  om" 
secretary  to  the  said  order,  shall  serve  for  any  warrant  or  order  that  we  shall 
think  fit  to  grant  or  emit  for  the  nominating  any  of  the  knights-brethren  or 
officers,  or  any  other  thing  relating  to  the  said  order. 

"  The  royal  chapel  of  our  palace  of  Holyroodhouse  to  be  the  chapel  of  the  or- 
der in  time  coming. 

"  That  no  alteration  of  the  habit,  jewel,  collar,  badge,  or  other  ornaments  be- 
longing to  the  said  order,  or  of  the  using  or  wearing  of  them,  be  offered  to  her 
majesty  by  any  of  the  brethren,  without  a  concurrence  of  the  major  part  of  them. 
'  Given  under  our  royal  hand  and  signet  at  our  Court  at  St  James's  the  31st  day 
of  December  1703  years,  and  of  our  reign  the  second  year. 

"  A.  R. 
"  By  Her  Majesty's  Command, 

"  Cromartie." 


Sterling 
L-55 

Money. 
11     u 
6     75 

5 

8 

27 

II 
6 
15 

6i^ 

5 

11 

I' 

EXTERIOR  ORNAMENT.S. 


The  Fees  eippoiitiul  by  Her  Sacred  Majesty  ^leen  A>fNE,  Sovereign  of  the  Most  An- 
cient and  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle,  to  be  paid  by  those  who  shall  be  admitted 
as  Knights-Brethren  of  the  said  Order  at  their  Mmission  thereto. 


"  Iinpr.  To  the  secretary  of  the  order, 

"  To  the  commissioner's  servants,  -  - 

"  To  the  church  fees,  viz.  ringer  of  bells, 

"  To  the  usher  of  the  order,  .  -  . 

"  To  the  Lyon's  Office,  heralds,  pursuivants,  trumpets,  &c. 

"  It  is  said  their  present  fees  on  this  head  is  now  L.  72  Sterling. 

"  To  the  queen's  ushers,  .... 

Summa  L.  in     2     2 

A.  R. 

"  We  do  hereby  order  and  require  all  who  are  or  shall  be  admitted  as  Knights- 
"  Brethren  of  the  Most  Ancient  and  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle,  to  pay  the 
"  fees  according  to  the  above  distribution,  upon  their  being  admitted  to  the  said 
"  order.  Given  under  our  royal  hand  and  signet  of  the  said  order  at  our  Court 
"  of  St  James's  the  29th  day  of  October  1705,  and  of  our  reign  the  fourth 
"  year. 

"  This  is  a  true  copy  of  the  statutes  and  orders  signed  by  her  majesty,  examined 
"  and  compared  with  the  originals,  by  me 

"  David  Nairn,  Sec.  nob.  ord.  carditi." 

The  History  of  Europe,  for  the  year  1704,  tells  us,  that,  on  the  31st  of  January, 
the  queen  was  pleased  to  sign  the  foresaid  patent  to  be  passed  the  Great  Seal  of 
Scotland,  for  reviving  and  restoring  there  the  Most  Ancient  and  Most  Noble  Order 
of  the  Thistle.  In  pursuance  of  which  patent,  John  Duke  of  Argyle  was  received 
into  that  order  the  4th  of  February  by  her  Majesty  the  Sovereign  thereof,  so  were 
three  days  after  John  Duke  of  Athol,  William  Marquis  of  Annandale,  James  Earl 
of  Dalkeith,  George  Earl  of  Orkney,  and  James  Earl  of  Seafield.  Her  Majesty 
dispensed,  during  her  royal  pleasilre,  with  the  ceremonies  and  solemnities  of  their 
instalment,  as  well  as  of  all  the  rest  of  the  knights-brethren ;  and  was  pleased  to 
give  a  commission  to  David  Nairn,  Esq.  to  be  secretary  of  the  said  order,  and  to 
confer  upon  him  the  honour  of  knighthood. 

Mr  Miege,  in  his  State  of  North  Britain,  gives  us  a  list  of  the  knights  com- 
panions of  the  Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle  in  the  reign  of  Queen  Anne,  to  the 
year  1711,  whose  names  are  as  follows,  John  Duke  of  Argyle,  John  Duke  of  Athol, 
William  Marquis  of  Annandale,  George  Earl  of  Orkney,  James  Earl  of  Seafield, 
William  Marquis  of  Lothian,  Charles  Earl  of  Orrery  Enghsh,  John  Earl  of  Marr, 
Hugh  Earl  of  Loudon,  and  John  Earl  of  Stair,  Sir  David  Nairn,  Bart.  Secretary  to 
the  Order. Usher  of  the  Thistle. 

And  not  only  during  the  reign  of  the  said  Queen  Anne  the  Most  Ancient  and 
Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle  continued  to  flourish  in  great  splendour  and  esteem, 
but  her  successor.  King  George,  highly  honoured  the  same:  For  Sir  Thomas 
Brand  was  created  by  him  Gentleman-Usher  of  the  Green  Rod,  of  the  Most  An- 
cient Order  of  the  Thistle,  or  St  Andrew,  and  Gentleman-Usher,  Daily  Waiter  to 
his  Majesty  King  George,  and  by  patent  carries,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  two 
battons,  or  rods,  or,  ensigned  on  the  top  with  the  unicorn  of  Scotland,  as  the  badge 
of  his  office,  and  the  second  and  third  quarter  of  his  arms  is  liis  paternal  coat; 
crest,  a  vol,  v.'ith  the  batton  of  the  office  erected  in  pale:  motto,  Advance;  and 
places  round  his  arms  the  chain  of  gold,  with  the  badge  of  the  order  pemJent,  viz. 
on  an  oval  ardent  a  St  An.lrew's  cross  surmounted  of  a  thistle,  and  round  the  same 
the  motto.  Nemo  me  impune  lacessit,  which  he  commonly  wears,  and  behind  the 
shield  he  carries  two  battons  in  saltier,  to  show  he  is  actually  in  post,  a  figure 
whereof  I  have  caused  cut  in  the  Plates  of  Acliievements  subjoined  to  the  First 

Vol.  U.  3  M 


120  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

Volume  of  my  System  of  Heraldry.  And  I  see  no  reason  but  the  rest  of  the 
ofticers  of  this  most  ancient  order,  Viz.  the  Secretary,  Lyon,  &.c.  may  outwardly 
adorn  and  trim  their  armorial  shields  with  the  collars  and  badges  of  their  several 
offices  after  the  like  manner.  King  George  did  also  create  new  knights  com- 
panions of  this  noble  order  in  the  room  of  old  ones  deceased,  viz.  John  Earl  of 
Sutherland,  as  does  also  his  son,  who,  now  reigns,  who,  on  St  Andrev/'s  day  yearly, 
November  30th,  goeth  with  the  royal  family  to  his  royal  chapel,  and  weais  St 
Andrew's  crosses  in  honour  of  that  day:  So  that  this  royal  order  of  knighthood 
continues  still  its  honour  and  reputation  at  this  very  day,  though  above  eight 
hundred  and  twenty  years  standing  since  its  first  institution  by  King  Achaius. 

And  besides,  (which  adds  very  much  to  the  honour  of  this  high  order)  according 
to  the  ancient  and  primitive  institution,  this  order  is  to  consist  of  no  more  than 
of  thirteen  persons,  viz.  the  sovereign  and  twelve  knights,  in  memory  of  our  Savi- 
our and  his  twelve  apostles;  whereas  the  great  increase  of  knights  companions  of 
many  other  orders  has  been  the  occasion  of  their  ruin  and  disesteem. 

The  solemn  meeting  of  these  knights  of  old  was  annually  on  St  Andrew's  day, 
in  the  church  of  the  town  dedicate  to  his  name;  during  the  festivity  the  knights 
were  richly  habited,  and  wore  their  Parliament  robes,  having  fixed  on  their  left 
shoulders  an  azure  roundel,  charged  with  a  saltier  argent,  or  St  Andrew's  cross  en- 
filed  in  centre,  with  a  crown  composed  of  flower-de-luces  or;  for  the  ordinary  and 
common  ensigns  the  knights  used  a  green  ribbon,  whereat  hung  a  thistle  of  gold 
crowned  with  an  imperial  crown,  within  a  circle  of  gold  containing  the  epigraph 
Nemo  me  impune  lacessit.  But  now  they  have  sewed  to  their  left  breast  an  irradia- 
tion (like  that  of  the  Knights  of  the  Garter)  over  a  saltier  silver,  the  irradiation 
charged  with  a  blue  roundel  of  St  Andrew's  cross.  As  also  the  said  St  Andrew's 
church,  the  ancient  chapel  of  the  order  being  ruined  at  the  Reformation,  which 
happened  in  the  reign  of  Queen  Mary,  and  besides,  this  noble  order  was  laid  aside, 
and  continued  so  (as  I  observed  before)  till  his  late  Majesty  King  James  VII.  re- 
stored it  again  by  a  patent,  dated  at  Windsor  the  29th  May  1687,  appointing  also 
his  chapel  royal  in  his  palace  at  Holyroodhouse  to  be  hereafter  the  chapel  of  the 
order,  instead  of  the  said  St  Andrew's  church  which  was  ruined;  which  chapel  he 
caused  beautifully  to  be  repaired,  and  fitted  up  by  the  hands  of  many  exquisite 
workmen  foreign  and  domestic,  who  adorned  the  same  with  the  ethgies  of  our 
Saviour,  his  twelve  apostles,  and  other  admirable  pieces  of  sculpture,  for  the  greater 
honour  and  conveniency  of  the  said  royal  knights.  But,  in  December  1688,  the 
city  of  Edinburgh  having  overpowered  Captain  Wallace,  who  was  posted  to  de- 
fend the  said  royal  palace  of  Holyroodhouse,  they  without  opposition  went  first  to 
the  said  royal  chapel,  and  broke  and  destroyed  to  pieces  all  the  curious  workmanship 
therein,  which  had  cost  the  said  King  James  a  considerable  sum  to  perform,  and 
carried  several  parcels  of  these  pieces  of  work  up  to  the  cross  of  Edinburgh,  and 
burnt  them  there.  The  author  of  a  Journey  Through  Scotland,  October,  London 
1729,  page  61.  tells  us,  "  That  this  church,  or  chapel,  is  very  neat,  with  the 
"  highest  roof  (says  he)  I  have  seen,  and  the  pillars  as  exquisite  as  St  George's 
"  Chapel  at  Windsor,  with  two  rows  of  stone  galleries  above.  King  James  VII. 
"  (continues  he)  erected  a  magnificent  throne  here  for  the  sovereign,  and  twelve 
"  stalls  for  the  twelve  knights  companions  of  the  Order  of  the  Thistle,  or  St  An- 
"  drew,  all  of  oak,  and  the  finest  masters  in  carved  work  all  over  Europe  employ- 
"  ed  in  it.  The  floor  was  finely  paved  with  marble,  a  fine  organ  was  also  erected; 
"  but  the  mob,  at  the  Revolution,  pulled  it  all  to  pieces,  thinking  it  that  smelled  too 
"  rank  of  popery,  not  leaving  so  much  as  a  stone  of  the  pavement,  but  what  they 
"  pulled  up  and  carried  away."  Yet  notwithstanding  hereof,  her  late  Majesty 
Qiieen  Anne,  upon  her  again  restoring  this  noble  order  of  knighthood,  by  a  war- 
rant under  her  royal  hand  and  signet,  dated  at  St  James's  31st  of  December  1703, 
did  again  ordain  and  confirm  her  royal  father's  order,  in  appointing  the  royal 
chapel  of  her  palace  of  Holyroodhouse  to  be  the  chapel  of  this  order  in  time 
coming,  and  which  continues  so  at  this  day. 

Andrew  Favin,  in  his  Theatre  of  Honour,  lib.  5.  cap  3.  page  96.  tells  us,  That 
the  foresaid  Achaius  King  of  Scotland  having  won  the  love  and  alliance  of  the 
King  Charlemagne,  and  the  Most  Christian  Kings  of  France  his  successors,  found 
himself  to  be  so  strong  and  mighty,  tltat  he  took  for  his  device  the  thistle  and  the 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  121 

rue,  and,  for  a  motto  tliereto,  Pour  ma  defence ;  because  (says  he)  the  thistle  is  not 
tractable,  or  easily  handled  without  good  gloves  made  of  the  hart's  skin,  whereby 
all  his  pricking  is  avoided.  As  giving  acknowledgment  thereby,  that  he  feared  nti 
foreign  princes  his  neighbours,  (continues  he)  seeing  he  leaned  on  the  succour  and 
alliance  of  the  French.  But  herein  this  author  is  mistaken,  for  it  is  of  verity  that 
France  has  been  more  obliged  to  the  valour  of  tlie  men  of  our  nation  than  any 
assistance  they  ever  gave  to  us;  yea  we  have  suffered  almost  our  kingdom  to  be 
over-run  by  the  English  in  their  quarrel,  and  had  it  not  been  the  valour  of  our  he- 
roes, who  always  of  old  assisted  them,  England,  long  ere  now,  had  made  a  conquest 
of  that  kingdom;  and  the  said  author,  Favin,  confesses  no  less,  as  he  ingeniously 
makes  it  appear  in  his  said  tifth  book,  by  giving  us  a  list  of  the  many  tliousands  ot 
Scotsmen  sent  by  our  kmg  from  Scotland  to  the  assistance  of  the  kmgs  of  France, 
all  led  by  gallant  commanders;  for  which  good  service  our  nation  received  from 
them  many  vakuble  privileges,  and  our  nobility  and  captains  sent  thither  were 
highly  rewarded  with  the  greatest  honours  and  preferments  that  kingdom  could 
give.  Again,  as  to  the  motto,  In  defence,  which  this  author  appropriates  to  the 
thistle,  as  I  observed  before,  I  still  judge  it  to  be  tlje  motto  of  the  royal  arms,  or 
crest  assumed  by  King  Achaius,  when  Charles  the  Great  honoured  the  said  king 
with  the  double  tressure  to  surround  the  rampant  lion  in  his  arms,  upon  the  alli- 
ance of  the  two  crowns  of  Scotland  and  France,  as  a  symbol,  to  show  that  the 
lilies  of  France  should  always  defend  the  lion  of  Scotland.  The  old  motto  of  the 
Order  of  the  Thistle,  viz.  Nemo  me  inipime  Incesset,  being  by  far  more  proper  and 
agreeable  thereto,  and  Menenius  also  tells  us,  that  this  was  the  old  and  only  motto 
peculiar  to  the  Order  of  the  Thistle. 

As  for  the  collar  of  this  noble  order,  which  consists  of  thistles  and  sprigs  of 
rue.  The  thistle,  says  Pliny,  in  his  Natural  History,  torn.  2.  page  79.  have  their 
leaves  beset  with  prickles,  they  bear  heads,  pointed  with  sharp  prickles  round 
about  in  manner  of  caltrops,  and  the  artichoke-thistle  puts  forth  a  purple  flower 
amidst  these  sharp-pointed  prickles,  and  when  sodden  is  a  great  strengthener  of  the 
stomach,  and  if  applied  to  the  matrix  of  women,  it  disposeth  and  prepareth  it  to 
conceive  men-children ;  and  Ch;^:veas  the  Athenian,  and  Glaucias  especially,  says  the 
same ;  as  likewise  these  thistles  causeth  a  sweet  breath.  As  for  the  rue,  although 
it  be  an  herb  and  plant  very  mean,  yet  it  is  nevertheless  full  of  admirable  virtues, 
so  that  men  and  beasts  likewise  having  eaten  thereof,  their  breath  only  serveth  to 
expel,  and  drive  serpents  to  flight  :  for  the  said  Pliny,  and  all  the  naturalists  do 
hold,  thatt  he  woodmartin,  the  weasel,  and  other  small  beasts  dare  be  bold  to 
graple  with  serpents,  yea,  the  viper  himself,  after  their  stomachs  are  filled  with 
rue.  Paulus  ^gineta,  and  all  the  herbalists,  are  of  opinion,  that  there  is  not  a 
more  sovereign  remedy,  for  such  as  are  poisoned,  to  vomit  up  the  poison,  than  to 
drink  it  in  warm  wine,  and  present  cure  has  instantly  ensued  by  this  herb.  And 
for  this  reason,  King  Achaius,  to  demonstrate  to  his  enemies  that  he  had  power 
to  make  all  their  practices  unprofitable,  took  these  two  herbs  for  his  device,  and 
composed  them  in  a  collar  of  this  order,  which  has  continued  to  this  dav. 

The  manner  of  wearing  the  ribbon  of  this  most  noble  order  in  time  of  peace, 
was  of  later  times  pendent  about  the  neck,  down  to  the  middle  of  the  breast, 
where  hung  the  jewel  of  the  order,  having  on  the  one  side  the  image  of  St  An- 
drew, holding  his  cross  before  him,  and  on  the  reverse  a  thistle,  or  and  vert,  the 
flower  reddish,  with  the  foresaid  motto  round  it.  But  since,  for  the  more  conve- 
niency  of  riding  or  action,  the  same  is  spread  over  the  left  shoulder,  and  brought 
under  the  right  arm,  where  the  jewel  now  hangs.  But  where  the  pictures  of  the 
sovereign  and  knights  companions  are  drawn  in  armour,  there,  even  to  this  day, 
the  said  jewel  is  represented  as  fixed  to  a  gold  chain  instead  of  a  ribbon,  and  worn 
about  the  neck,  and  not  brought  under  the  right-arm. 

And  there  is  a  standard  of  honour  provided  for  the  sovereign  to  measure  the 
extraction,  quality,  and  merit  of  the  persim  proposed  to  be  elected  of  this  order, 
lest  it  might  chance,  through  the  indulgence  of  the  sovereign,  this  fountain  of 
honour  might  be  mudded  by  the  choice  of  inferior  and  undeserving  persons:  for 
Benjamin  Smithurst,  in  his  Britain's  Glory,  page  43.  tells  us,  that  the  knights  of 
this  order  are  appointed  to  be  of  the  most  noble  men  of  Scotland  ;  and  if  of  an- 
other nation,  they  are  never  chosen  below  nobility,  as  witness  Charles  Boyle  Earl. 


J22  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

of  Orrery,  an  Irish  peer,  who  was  elected  by  Queen  Anne,  a  knight  companion  of 
this  order  ;  and  no  doubt  the  sovereign's  design  herein  was,  that  none  should  be 
elected  of  this  order,  unless  he  be  worthy,  upon  the  account  of  birth  and  arms. 
For  it  is  certam  gentihty  does  not  receive  its  perfection  in  the  person  it  was  first 
devolved  on,  but  is  rather  completed  by  succession:  for  among  the  Romans,  though 
tlie  father  was  free-born,  and  of  the  equestrian  cense  ;  yet  it  was  farther  requisite 
that  the  grandfather  should  be  the  same,  or  else  they  could  not  obtain  the  ring, 
one  of  the  symbols  of  the  Equestrian  Order,  as  Pliny  informs  us.  Gentility,  there- 
fore, hath  its  beginning  in  the  grandfather,  its  increase  in  the  father,  and  full  ripe- 
ness in  the  son  ;  and  consequently  in  the  constitution  of  gentility,  the  father  and 
grandfather  conveying  a  lustre  to  the  son,  make  it  entire  and  complete  ;  for  it  is 
incongruous  to  suppose  a  ripeness  in  the  son,  unless  there  had  been  a  former  in- 
crease in  the  father. 

As  to  the  objections  made  by  some  English  authors,  and  others  misled  by  them, 
against  the  antiquity  of  this  noble  order,  seeing  they  carry  more  of  prejudice  than 
reason,  I  shall  pass  them  over  with  silence,  and  the  rather,  that  since  the  union 
these  prejudices  are  now  laid  aside  by  them,  hoping  I  have  advanced  above  what 
will  be  sufficient  to  convince  my  impartial  reader  of  the  antiquity  of  this  most  an- 
cient and  noble  order  of  knighthood  ;  and  if  our  nation  had  been  so  fortunate  as 
to  have  had  our  ancient  records  and  old  monuments  of  antiquity  preserved  to  this 
day,  which  the  calamity  of  war  and  other  accidents  has  deprived  us  of,  we  might 
have  had  fuller  accounts  and  clearer  documents  to  have  obliged  the  presenfgenera- 
tion  with  concerning  the  same.  As  for  the  story  about  the  commencement  of  this 
Royal  Order  of  St  Andrew,  by  the  appearance  of  the  cross  of  his  martyrdom  in  the 
sky,  though  it  may,  to  polite  wits  of  this  age,  look  like  a  legend,  yet  1  believe  it  is 
much  of  a  piece  with  what  we  are  told  by  the  following  famous  authors,  viz.  Euse- 
bius  de  Vit.  Constant,  lib.  r.  cap.  29.  Socrates  Hist.  Eccl.  lib.  i.  cap.  2.  Sozomen, 
lib.  I.  cap.  3.  and  others,  concerning  the  first  Christian  Emperor  Constantine:  they 
say,  that  while  this  Prince  was  (at  the  intreaty  of  the  senate  and  people  of  Rome) 
on  his  march,  in  order  to  suppress  the  tyranny  of  Maxentius,  and  being  doubtful 
of  the  success,  and  therefore  afraid  of  the  danger  of  such  an  expedition,  he  per- 
ceived a  burning  cross  in  the  heavens,  with  three  Greek  words,  which  signified 
that  this  should  be  a  sign  of  his  victory  ;  and  they  add,  that  upon  this  assurance 
he  caused  the  figure  of  the  cross,  just  as  he  had  seen  it,  to  be  set  in  gold  upon  the 
imperial  standard,  and  then  set  forward  and  prospered.  Now  whether  either  or 
both  of  these  miracles  have  been  wrought  by  designing  Providence,  or  if  they 
ought  to  be  ranked  among  the  pious  cheats  of  the  old  priests  and  monks,  I  leave 
it  to  the  more  curious  to  examine.  This  is  certain,  Constantine  overthrew  Maxen- 
tius, and  Achaius  defeated  Athelstan. 

The  next  old  order  of  knighthood  with  us  was  the  Banrents  or  Bannerets,  creat- 
ed so  under  the  royal  banner  for  gallant  actions  in  the  field,  and  seldom  or  never 
conferred  but  upon  persons  of  extraordinary  merit,  many  of  whom  were  able,  by 
their  arms  and  numerous  vassals,  to  raise,  maintain,  command,  and  lead  gallantly 
a  company  of  soldiers  to  field  in  time  of  war,  under  their  own  particular  banners 
of  their  arms  ;  and  very  many  of  the  predecessors  of  our  old  families  here  in 
Scotland  have  been  advanced  to  this  truly  honourable  degree  of  knighthood  on 
the  consideration  of  their  courage  and  valorous  exploits  in  times  of  war  and 
battles  ;  so  that  our  nation,  of  old,  having  produced  so  many  of  these  gallant 
heroes,  it  would  take  up  the  subject  of  a  volume  by  itself  to  narrate  their  names 
and  heroic  deeds  ;  Sir  Robert  the  Bruce,  Sir  William  Wallace,  and  many  hun- 
dreds more  of  our  nation  being  all  advanced  to  this  military  order  of  knighthood, 
on  account  of  their  valour,  and  the  same  being  but  only  a  temporary  dignity,  it 
was  bestowed  on  none  but  those,  who,  by  their  valour  in  chivalry,  deserved  it  ; 
and  the  son  could  not  succeed  the  father  in  this  dignity  till  he  had  performed  some 
valorous  action  to  merit  the  same,  in  order  to  fit  him  for  being  a  leader  of  a  com- 
pany of  men  of  war. 

Sir  George  Mackenzie  in  his  Precedency,  p.  55.  says,  "  That  he  finds  of  old  a 

"  bannerent  (or  a  ban-rent)  has  been  with  us  a  title  higher  than  a  baron,   for,   by 

"  act  102,  Parliament  7th,  James  I.  anno  1427,  barons  may  choose  their  own  com- 

"  missioners,  but  bishops,  dukes,  earls,  lords,  and  ban-vents  are  to  be  summoned  to 

2. 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  123 

"  parliament  by  the  king's  special  precept ;  and  it  is  probable  (continues  he) 
"  that  these  baa-reius  were  knights  of  extraordinary  reputation  who  i\ere  allowed 
"  to  raise  a  company  of  men  under  tlicir  own  banners ;  but  now  it  is  commonly 
"  taken  for  such  as  are  knighted  by  the  king  or  pnnce  under  the  royal  standard 
"  in  time  of  war."  But  1  conceive  that  tliose  could  not  now  sit  in  Parliament  upon 
the  king's  precept,  the  former  act  of  Parliament  being  in  desuetude  :  They 
have  the  precedency  from  baronets,  though  their  wives  have  not,  tins  being  but 
a  temporary  dignity,  and  the  other  an  heritable..  The  undoubted  badge  of  these 
knights  was  a  golden  collar  of  SS's ;  though  the  usage  thereof  is  now  grown  obso- 
lete, yet  1  see  no  reason  why  those  of  this  degree  of  knighthood  may  not,  at  this 
time,  exteriorly  adorn  their  armorial  shields  with  such  a  colUr,  the  same  being 
both  regular  and  agreeable  to  the  practice  of  all  knights  who  are  honoured  with 
tlie  cognosce  or  symbol  of  a  collar  as  the  badge  of  their  dignity. 

The  next  degree  of  knighthood  with  us  is  the  Order  of  Baronet  in  Scotland, 
which  was  erected  for  advancing  the  plantation  of  Nova  Scotia  in  America,  and 
for  settling  a  colony  there,  to  which  the  aid  of  these  knights  was  designed.  Tlie 
order  was  only  intended  by  King  James  VI.  before  his  death  ;  for  in  iiis  lirst 
charter  of  Nova  Scotia,  in  favour  of  Sir  William  Alexander,  dated  icth  of  Sep- 
tember i6zi,  and  in  another  charter  granted  to  Sir  Robert  Dunbar  of  Locliinvar, 
of  a  part  of  Nova  Scotia,  designed  the  barony  of  Galloway,  dated  8th  November 
1621,  there  is  no  mention  made  of  this  ordei-):  so  that  the  same  was  only  erected 
by  King  Charles  l.a/ino  1625.  In  the  several  patents  granted  to  baronets,  his  ma- 
jesty did  dispone  to  each  of  these  knights  a  certain  portion  of  land  in  Nova  Scotia, 
erecting  the  same  into  a  free  barony,  with  great  and  ample  privileges  unnecessary 
to  be  inserted  here.  And  moreover,  for  their  encouragement,  did  erect,  create, 
make,  constitute,  and  ordain  that  heritable  state,  degree,  dignity,  name,  order, 
title,  and  stile  of  baronet,  to  be  enjoyed  by  every  of  these  gentlemen  wlio  did 
hazard  for  the  good  and  increase  of  that  plantation  :  and  so  preferred  them  to  that 
order  and  title,  creating  them  and  their  heirs-male  heritable  baronets  in  all  time 
coming,  with  the  place,  pre-eminency,  priority,  and  precedency  in  all  commissons, 
brieves,  letters  patent,  naraings,  and  writs,  and  in  all  sessions,  conventions,  congrega- 
tions, and  places,  at  all  times  and  occasions  whatsomever,  before  all  knights  cal- 
led equites  aurati,  all  lesser  barons  commonly  called  Lairds,  and  before  aU  other 
gentlemen  :  excepting  the  above  Sir  William  Alexander,  his  INIajesty's  Lieutenant 
of  Nova  Scotia,  who  (with  his  heir,  their  wives  and  children  conform)  is  not  only 
excepted  in  each  of  these  letters  patent  granted  to  the  knights  his  consorts,  but 
hkewise  the  charter  granted  to  himself  by  King  Charles  I.  anno  1625,  did  bear 
expressly  this  exception  and  provison ;  as  alsd  excepting  knights  bannerets  who 
should  be  created  under  the  royal  standard  in  his  majesty's  army  and  in  open 
war,  the  king  himself  being  present,  and  that  during  the  banneret's  lifetime  only : 
and  with  precedency  before  all  of  the  same  order  whose  patents  are  of  a  posterior 
date.  His  majesty  did  moreover  declare  and  ordain,  that  the  wives  of  these 
knights,  and  of  their  heirs-male  should  have  the  precedency,  as  well  after  as  be- 
fore the  deaths  of  their  husbands,  if  they  should  happen  to  survive,  before  the 
wives  of  all  those  of  whom  the  knights  baronets  and  their  heirs-male  had  the  pre- 
cedency, and  even  before  the  wives  of  knights  bannerets  before  excepted,  (the 
degree  of  baronet  being  heritable ;)  and  also  that  the  children,  male  and  female 
of  the  baronet,  should  take  place  before  the  children  male  and  female  respectively, 
of  all  persons  of  whom  tlie  baronets  and  their  heirs-male  had  the  priority :  and 
likewise  before  the  children  of  the  bannerets  ;  and  that  the  wives  of  the  sons  of 
the  baronets,  and  of  their  heirs-male  should  precede  the  wives  of  all  persons  whom 
their  husbands  might  precede,  and  that  as  well  their  husbands  being  dead  as  liv- 
ing. And  further,  hi?  majesty  did  declare  and  promise,  that  whensoever  the  el- 
dest sons  and  apparent  heirs-male  of  the  baronets  should  attain  to  the  age  of 
twenty-one  years,  they  should  be  by  his  majesty  and  his  successors  created  equites 
aurati.  or  knights-bachelors,  without  payment  of  any  fees  or  dues  for  the  same, 
providing  they  should  desire  it.  But  here  it  is  to  be  observed,  that  some  of  the 
eldest  sons  of  baronets  pretend  to  the  title  of  knight  at  their  majority,  by  virtue 
of  this  clause,  without  any  previous  desire  or  dubbing,  which  certainly  is  an  er- 
ror;  for  if  they  will  not  be  at  the  pains  to  desire  of  his  majcity  or  his  commis- 

VoL.  U.  3  N. 


124  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

sioner,  they  should  not  assume  it :  likeas,  his  majesty  did  declare  and  ordain,  that 
the  baronets  and  then-  heirs-male  should,  as  an  additament  of  honour  to  tneir  ar- 
morial ensigns,  bear  either  on  a  canton  or  inescutcheon,  in  their  i:p[ion,  the  ensign- 
of  Nova  Scotia,  being  argent,  a  cross  of  St  Andrew  azure,  (the  badge  of  Scotland 
counter-changed)  charged  with  an  escutcheon  of  the  royal  arms  of  Scotland, 
supported  on  the  dexter  by  the  royal  unicorn,  and,  on  the  sinister,  by  a  savage  or 
wild  man,  proper;  and,  for  the  crest,  a  branch  of  laurel,  and  a  thistle  issuing  from 
two  hands  conjoined,  the  one  being  armed,  the  other  naked,  with  this  ditto, 
Munit  hac  IS  altera  vhwit.  And  that  they  and  their  heirs-male  should,  in  all 
times  coming,  have  place  in  all  his  majesty's  and  his  successors'  armies  in  the  mid- 
dle battle,  near  and  about  the  royal  standard,  for  defence  thereof.  And  that  they 
and  their  heirs-male  may  have  two  attenders  of  the  body  for  bearing  up  the  pall, 
one  principal  mourner,  and  four  assistants  at  their  funerals;  and  that  they  should 
be  always  called,  intitled,  and  designed  by  the  name  and  title  of  Baronet;  and  that 
in  all  Scotish  speeches  and  writings,  the  addition  of  Sir,  and  in  all  other  discourses 
and  writings,  a  word  signifying  the  same  should  be  proponed  to  their  names  and 
other  titles,  and  that  the  stile  and  title  of  Baronet  should  be  postponed  and  sub- 
joined thereto  in  all  letters  patent  and  other  writs  whatsomever,  as  a  necessary, 
addition  of  dignity,  and  that  each  of  them  shall  be  intitled.  Sir  A.  B.  Baronet,  and 
his  and  his  sons'  wives  should  enjoy  the  stile,  title,  and  appellation  of  Lady,  Ma- 
dam, and  Dame,  respectively,  according  to  the  usual  phrase  in  speaking  and 
writing.  And  also  his  majesty  did  thereby  promise,  that  the  number  of  the  baro- 
nets, as  well  in  Scotland,  as  the  new  colony  of  Nova  Scotia,  should  never  exceed 
the  number  of  150,  (albeit  this  number  is  at  present  somewhat  augmented;)  and 
did  likewise  declare,  that  he  nor  his  successors  should  never  create  nor  erect  in 
time  coming  any  other  dignity,  degree,  stile,  name,  order,  title,  or  state,  nor 
should 'give  the  priority  or  precedency  to  any  person  or  persons,  under  the  stile, 
degree,  and  dignity  of  a  Lord  of  Parliament  of  Scotland,  which  should  be,  or  should 
be  presumed  to  be,  higher,  superior,  or  equal  to  that  of  baronet :  and  that  the  ba- 
ronet should  have  liberty  to  take  place  before  any  such  who  should  happen  to  be 
created  of  any  such  degree  or  order,  and  that  their  wives,  sons,  daughters,  and  sons' 
wives  should  have  their  places,  accordingly  :  and  that  if  any  question  or  doubt 
should  arise  anent  their  places  and  prerogatives,  the  same  should,  be  decided  and 
judged  according  to  these  laws  and  customs  by  which  other  degrees  of  heritable 
dignities  have  their  privileges  cognosced  and  determined.  And  finally,  that  none 
should  be  created  baronet  either  of  Scotland  or  Nova  Scotia,  till  he  had  first  ful- 
filled the  conditions  designed  by  his  majesty,  for  the  good  and  increase  of  that 
plantation,  and  until  he  had  certified  the  same  to  the  king  by  his  majesty's  lieute- 
nant there. 

These  patents  were  ratified  in  Parliament,  and  were  always  of  this  form  till  the 
selling  of  Nova  Scotia  to  the  French  ;  after  which  they  were  made  much  shorter. 
and  granted  in  general  terms,  with  all  the  privileges,  precedencies,  &c.  of  the 
former  baronets.  Mr  Miege,  in  his  State  of  North  Britain,  tells  us,  That  knights 
baronets  in  Scotland  are  allowed  to  wear  about  their  necks  an  orange-tawny  silk 
ribbon,  to  which  is  appended,  in  a  scutcheon  argent,  a  saltier  azure,  surcharged 
with  an  inescutcheon  of  the  arms  of  Scotland,  and  an  imperial  crown  above  the 
last  scutcheon,  encircled  with  this  motto,  Fax  mentis  bonesta gloria;  and  the  learn- 
ed and  judicious  Elias  Ashmole,  in  his  Institution  of  the  Garter,  says  the  same  : 
And,  to  confirm  this,  in  the  year  1629  his  Majesty  did  allow  these  baronets  a  par- 
ticular cognizance,  which  will  be  best  known  by  the  copy  of  the  following  letter, 
directed  by  his  Majesty  King  Charles  I.  to  the  Lords  of  his  Privy  Council  of  this 
kingdom,  a  copy  whereof,  as  inserted  by  Sir  George  Mackenzie  in  his  Precedency, 
page  54,  I  here  narrate  as  follows. 

"  Right  Trusty,  and  Right  Well-Beloved  Cousin  and  Counsellor,  Right  Trusty 
"  and  Well-Beloved  Cousins  and  Counsellors,  and  Right  Trusty  and  Well- 
"  Beloved  Counsellors,  we  Greet  you  well.  Whereas,  upon  good  considera- 
"  tion,  and  for  the  better  advancement  of  the  plantation  of  New  Scotland, 
"  which  may  much  import  the  good  of  our  service,  and  the  honour  and  benefit 
"  of  that  our  ancient  kingdom,  our  royal  father  did  intend,  and  we  since  have 
"  erected  the  order  and  title  of  Baronet  in  our  said  ancient  kingdom,  which  we 
"  have   since  established,  and  conferred  the  same   on  divers  gentlemen  of  good 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  125 

"  quality  :  And  seeing  our  Trusty  and  Well-Beloved  Counsellor  Sir  William 
"  Alexander,  Knight,  our  principal  Secretary  of  that  our  ancient  kuigdom  of 
"  Scotland,  and  our  Lieutenant  of  New  Scotland,  who  these  many  years  bygone 
"  hath  been  at  great  charges  for  the  discovery  thereof,  hath  now  in  end  a  colony 
"  there,  where  his  son  Sir  William  is  now  resident ;  and  we  being  most  willing  to 
"  aflbrdall  the  possible  means  of  encouragement  that  conveniently  wc  can  to  the 
"  baronets  of  that  our  ancient  kingdom,  for  the  furtherance  of  so  good  a  work, 
"  and  to  the  ellcct  they  may  be  honoured,  and  have  place  in  all  respects,  accord- 
"  ing  to  their  patents  from  us,  we  have  been  pleased  to  authorize  and  allow,  aa 
"  by  these  presents,  for  us  and  our  successors,  we  authorise  and  allow  the  said 
"  lieutenant  and  baronets,  and  every  one  of  them,  and  their  heirs-male,  to  wear 
"  and  carry  about  their  ne -ks  in  all  time  coming  an  orange-tawny  silk  ribbon, 
"  whefeeon  shall  be  pendent  in  a  scutcheon  ardent  a  saltier  uzure,  thereon  an  in- 
"  escutcheon  of  the  arms  of  Scotland,  with  an  imperial  crown  above  the  scutcheon, 
"  and  encircled  with  this  motto,  K/.v  miUis  honestte  gloria;  which  cognizance  our 
"  said  present  lieutenant  shall  dehver  now  to  them  from  us,  that  they  may  be  the 
"  better  known  and  distinguished  from  other  persons.  And  that  none  pretend 
"  ignorance  of  the  respect  due  unto  them,  our  pleasure  therefore  is,  that  by  open 
"  proclamation  at  the  market  cross  of  Edinburgh,  and  of  all  other  head  burghs 
"  of  our  kingdom,  and  such  other  places  as  you  shall  think  necessary,  you  cause 
"  intimate  our  royal  pleasure  and  intention  herein  to  all  our  subjects.  And  if  any 
"  person,  out  of  neglect  or  contempt,  shall  presume  to  take  place  and  precedency 
"  of  the  said  baronets,  their  wives  or  children,  which  is  due  unto  them  by  their 
"  patents,  or  to  wear  their  cognizance,  we  will  that,  upon  notice  thereof  given  to 
"  you,  you  cause  punish  such  offenders,  by  fining  or  imprisoning  them  as  you 
"  shall  think  fitting,  that  others  may  be  terrified  trom  attempting  the  like.  And 
"  we  ordain  that  from  time  to  time,  as  occasion  of  granting  or  Venewing  their 
"  patents,  gr  their  heirs  succeeding  to  the  dignity,  shall  offer,  that  the  said  power 
"  to  them  to  carry  the  said  ribbon,  and  cognizance,  shall  be  therein  particularly 
"  granted  and  inserted.  And  we  likewise  ordain  thir  presents  to  be  insert  and 
"  registrate  in  the  books  of  our  Council  and  Exchequer,  and  that  you  cause  regi- 
"  strate  the  same  in  the  books  of  the  Lyon  King  at  Arms,  and  heralds,  there  to 
"  remain  ad  fin ur am  ret  memoriam;  and  that  all  parties  having  interest  may  have 
"  authentic  copies  and  extracts  thereof.  And  for  your  so  doing,  these  our  letters 
"  shall  be  unto  you,  and  every  one  of  you  from  time  to  time  your  sufficient  war- 
"  rant  and  discharge  in  that  Isehalf.  Given  at  our  Court  at  Whitehall  the  17th  of 
"  November  1629  year*." 

From  hence  I  observe,  that  after  so  plain  and  positive  a  letter  from  his  then 
Royal  Majesty  King  Charles  L  whose  will  and  pleasure  therein  is  also  expressly 
ordained  by  liim  to  be  openly  proclaimed,  that  none  might  pretend  ignorance 
(and  which  unquestionably  was  done,  and  performed  at  the  places  needful  within 
this  kingdom)  of  the  honourable  privilege  and  allowance  granted  by  his  said  ma- 
jesty to  all  knight  baronets  within  tlris  realm,  allowing  each  of  them  and  their 
heirs-male  to  wear  about  their  necks  a  ribbon  or  collar  for  the  greater  honour  of 
this  degree  of  knighthood,  with  a  pendant  hanging  thereto,  as  is  fully  and  clearly 
narrated  in  the  said  letter,  which  his  majesty  authorises  and  allows  not  only  for 
himself,  but  ordains  his  successors  in  the  government  of  this  kingdom  to  authorise 
and  allow  of  the  same  to  the  said  baronets  and  their  said  heirs-male,  and  also  that 
succeeding  generations  might  be  certified  of  his  positive  will  and  order  herein,  or- 
daining likewise  his  said  letter  to  be  registrate  not  only  in  the  books  of  his  Secret 
Council  and  Exchequer,  but  also  of  those  of  the  Lyon  King  at  Arms,  and  heralds; 
and  there  being  no  other  order  or  deed  since  granted  (that  I  know  of)  in  preju- 
dice hereof  by  any  of  our  succeeding  kings,  it  has  certainly  been  wrong  in  our 
several  Lord  Lyons  since  to  have  granted  warrants  under  their  seals  of  office  to 
these  knights  baronets,  for  carrying  their  arms  with  no  other  distinction  for  the  de- 
gree of  baronet  than  the  bare  ensign  or  arms  of  Nova  Scotia,  in  a  canton  or  in- 
escutcheon  within  their  armorial  shield.  As  also,  it  hath  been  no  less  irregular  in 
his  brethren  herald-painters  to  have  drawn  and  illuminate  such  coats  of  arms  en- 
tirely contrary  to  the  said  express  royal  order  and  command  ;  for  in  so  doing,  as 
they  have  no  royal  warrant  to  authorise  the  same,  so  thereby  they  very  much  de- 


126  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

prive  the  knights  of  this  degree  of  the  honour  and  privilege  his  said  majesty  was 
pleased  to  confer  upon  them,  in  relation  to  their  armorial  bearings,  and  as  a  dis- 
tinguishing cognosce  particularly  allowed  by  him  to  this  order  of  knighthood. 
Yet  though  these  practices  have  been  continued  by  the  Lord  Lyon  and  his  said 
brethren  even  to  this  time,  to  the  great  diminishing  the  honour  allowed  these 
collared  knights  by  royal  authority,  so  I  am  hopeful,  on  the  considerations  follow- 
ing, they  will  in  time  coming  be  pleased  to  rectify  their  mistake  herein,  and,  in 
trimming  for  the  future  the  armorial  shields  of  all  those  gentlemen  of  this  degree 
of  knighthood,  allow  them  this  honour  that  our  said  royal  sovereign  has  so  ex- 
pressly granted  unto  them,  to  wear  and  carry  about  their  necks  in  all  time  coning 
a  ribbon  and  pendant,  as  aforesaid  ;  and  so  likewise,  according  to  the  custom  and 
practice  of  all  other  collared  knights,  they  may  as  regularly  have  the  shield  of 
their  arms  exteriorly  surrounded  and  adorned  with  an  orange -tawny  silk  ribbon, 
with  an  oval  pendant  hanging  thereat,  charged  with  a  shield,  containing  the  arms 
of  Nova  Scotia,  viz.  argent,  a  saltier  nzure,  surmounted  of  another  shield  or, 
charged  with  a  lion  rampant  within  a  double  tressure,  counter-flowered  with  flower- 
de-luces  ^w/fj-,  being  the  royal  arms  of  Scotland;  and  which  last  shield  is  ensigned 
on  the  top  with  an  imperial  crown,  proper,  and,  within  a  circle,  going  round  the 
said  oval  this  motto,  Fax  mentis  bonestce  gloria. 

Now  as  this  method  of  trimming  these  knights'  arms  is  more  honourable,  so  it 
is  certainly  more  regular;  for  hereby  the  armorial  shield  within  is  freed  of  the  in- 
cumbrances of  a  canton  or  inescutcheon  of  the  said  arms  of  Nova  Scotia;  by  which 
usage  very  often  some  of  the  principal  figures  in  the  charge  are  suppressed,  and  not 
visible  in  order  and  equity  to  give  place  hereto.  And  when  the  arms  of  any  of 
these  knights  happen  to  be  a  quarterly  quartered  coat,  then  commonly  this 
badge  of  Nova  Scotia  is  placed  in  surtout,  by  which  some  of  the  figures  in  four 
quarters  of  such  bearings  are  hid  and  not  discernible.  And  moreover  in  all  minute 
figures  and  drawings  of  such  arms,  as  many  of  the  principal  figures,  within  the 
shield  are  thereby  suppressed,  so  the  badge  itself  being  (for  proportion  sake) 
obliged  to  be  formed  so  very  small,  the  same  is  very  often  hardly  perceptible. 

Yet  though  these  incumbrances  do  not  prove  so  convincing  and  satisfactory  a 
reason,  as  to  cause  our  Lord  Lyon  and  present  herald-painters  alter  their  former 
and  present  practice  hereanent,  my  next  consideration,  to  prove  the  irregularity 
hereof,  is  this,  that  though  King  Charles  L  by  his  first  royal  patents  to  these 
knights  bai'onets,  in  the  year  1625,  as  an  additament  of  honour  allowed  by  him  to 
be  borne  by  them  in  their  armorial  ensigns,  granted  them  to  carry  within  their 
shields  of  arms,  either  on  a  canton  or  shield,  in  their  option,  the  said  ensign  of 
Nova  Scotia,  yet  it  is  to  be  further  observed,  that  at  the  same  time,  and  on  the 
same  head,  they  are  also  allowed  to  trim  the  said  badge  or  ensign  with  particular 
exterior  ornaments,  viz.  the  supporters,  crest  and  motto  belonging  thereto,  which 
are  as  expressly  therein  named  by  the  said  king  as  the  badge  itself.  Now,  if  the 
Lyon  and  his  said  brethren,  notwithstanding  of  this  royal  allowance,  shall  hereafter 
continue  their  old  practice,  in  only  allov^'ing  these  knights  to  carry  within  their 
armorial  shields  the  bare  ensign  of  Nova  Scotia,  as  a  cognosce  of  that  degree  of 
knighthood,  then  certainly,  in  my  opinion,  these  knights  are  hereby  very  much 
wronged,  and  the  armorial  distinction  granted  to  them  by  his  said  majesty  is  at 
the  same  time  greatly  diminished,  by  abstracting  therefrom  the  proper  exterior  or- 
naments granted  by  the  said  king  for  adorning  of  the  said  badge  or  ensign;  and 
that  the  said  badge  was  ever  trimmed  with  these  exterior  ornaments,  according  to  the 
tenor  of  the  said  patents,  is  what  I  never  saw  done  or  performed  in  any  of  these 
knights'  arms. 

My  last  and  chief  reason  for  altering  and  rectifying  the  foresaid  practice  is,  that 
the  allowance  granted  by  his  said  majesty,  in  his  first  patents  to  the  said  knights, 
anent  the  ensign  or  cognosce  allowed  by  him  to  be  worn  by  them  within  the 
escutcheon  of  their  arms,  was  at  the  same  time  disallowed,  and  unquestionably 
annulled  by  a  posterior  letter  or  proclamation  granted  by  the  said  King  Charles 
in  the  year  1629,  by  which,  for  the  greater  honour  of  these  knights,  and  to  free 
their  armorial  shields  of  the  foresaid  incumbrances,  allowed  them  (as  a  distinguish 
ing  badge  of  this  degree  of  knighthood)  to  carry  hereafter  a  ribbon  and  pendant 
as  aforesaid :  For,  to  continue  the  cognosce  allowed  by  his  said  majesty  to  these 


EXTERIOR  ORNAIVIENTS.  127 

kniglits  within  their  shield  of  arms,  and  to  make  the  same  an_v\vi-,c  perceptible, 
the  lield  undoubtedly  would  require  to  be  very  large,  so  as  to  admit  of  a  canton 
or  shield  (whicli  according  to  the  regular  rules  of  heraldry  are  allowed  but  a 
suitable  bounds  in  the  field)  to  trim  the  said  ensign  or  badge,  which  contains  so 
many  figures  within  and  without  the  shield  thereof,  that  the  same  is  a  suflicient 
coat  of  arms  by  itself,  and  too  narrow  to  be  wholly  trimmed  in  a  canton  or  shield, 
and  in  a  minute  figure  it  is  almost  impossible  to  be  performed;  and  our  said  royal 
sovereign,  very  probably  on  this  consideration,  being  afterwards  more  rightly  ni- 
formed  of  the  impracticableness  hereof,  presumably  by  the  truly  ingenious,  curious, 
and  learned  antiquary  Sir  James  Balfour  of  Denmiln,  then  Lord  Lyon,  (to  whom 
our  nation  is  much  obliged  for  his  valuable  collections,  many  of  which  are  now 
lodged  in  the  Lawyers'  Librajy  at  Edinburgh)  wisely  tiiouglit  fit  to  alter  his 
former  grant,  and  by  his  said  letter  to  his  council,  in  place  of  the  said  canton,  ex- 
pressly grants  to  these  knights,  as  the  badge  of  that  knighthood,  to  wear  a  collar 
with  a  pendant  as  aforesaid. 

But  if  here  it  shall  be  objected,  that  notwithstanding  of  the  above  particular  or- 
der, yet  now  the  stile  of  the  new  patents,  granted  by  succeeding  kings  to  such 
gentlemen  as  they  have  been  pleased  to  advance  to  this  degree  of  knightiiood,  arc- 
narrated  otherwise,  and  the  badge  or  symbol,  fit  and  convenient  for  them  to  carry 
in  their  arms,  as  being  a  baronet,  is  now  left  to  the  Lord  Lyon  to  grant  as  he 
thinks  most  proper.  As  in  the  patent  or  diploma  granted  by  King  James  VIL  to 
Sir  Robert  Mylne  of  Barnton,  of  the  stile  and  dignity  of  Knight  Baronet,  dated  ai 
Whitehall  19th  March  1686,  which  runs  thus,  "  Leoni  porro  armorum  regi  ejus- 
"  que  fratribus  fecialibus  pra;nominato  Roberto  Mylne  cjusque  hasredibus  ante  dic- 
"  turn  masculis  insignia  armorea,  sen  prioribus  insigniis  additamenta  qua:  apta  &- 
"  convenientia  hac  occasione  videbuntur  dare  &-  prescribere  imperamus."  To 
this  I  answer,  That  though  the  said  King  James,  and  his  successors  since,  may  have 
granted  their  patents  to  these  knights  after  this  method  and  stile,  yet  it  is  very 
presumable  the  same  has  been  done  by  them  through  misinformation,  and  the  ig- 
norance of  those  who  composed  tlie  form  and  stile  of  these  patents  that  they  have 
been  pleased  to  sign:  For  it  is  not  to  be  doubted  but  the  said  King  James  had 
more  regard  for  his  father  than  to  pass  any  deed  under  his  hand  contrary  to  hi* 
said  father's  so  express  will  and  pleasure  in  the  above  royal  letter,  if  he  had  been 
rightly  informed  thereanent ;  so  that  I  cannot  think  this  to  be  the  real  will  and  inten- 
tion of  our  said  sovereign,  but  the  mistake  of  the  formalists,  when  it  is  so  expressly 
narrated  in  the  above-mentioned  royal  letter  granted  by  King  Charles  L  in  favour  of 
knights  baronets,  in  manner  following,  viz.  "  And  we  ordain,  that  from  time  to 
"  time,  as  occasion  of  granting  or  renewing  their  patents,  or  their  heirs  succeeding 
"  to  the  dignity,  shall  offer,  that  the  said  power  to  them  to  carry  the  said  ribbon 
"  and  cognizance  shall  be  therein  particularly  granted  and  inserted."  And,  in  my 
opinion,  as  no  authority  that  I  yet  know  of  is  more  express  and  positive,  so  no 
badge  that  has  as  yet  been  made  use  of  is  more  honourable,  fit,  and  convenient, 
to  be  hereafter  granted  by  the  Lord  Lyon,  and  his  said  brethren,  to  these  knights, 
than  the  above-mentioned  ribbon  and  pendant. 

The  next  and  last  degree  of  knighthood  with  us,  is  that  of  knight-batchelors. 
These  of  this  degree  are  the  same  sort  with  those  that  were  formerly  made  such 
by  holding  a  certain  proportion  of  land  by  knight's  service,  and  therefore  were 
obliged  to  serve  the  king  in  his  wars,  at  their  own  expence,  for  the  space  of  forty 
days,  well  and  completely  arrayed  for  the  war.  About  the  quantity  of  a  knight's 
fee  there  have  been  various  opinions,  or  rather  it  has  varied  according  to  the  times, 
being  first  reckoned  at  L.20  per  annum,  and  afterwards  at  L. 40.  In  Latin  a 
knight  is  commonly  called  miles,  a  soldier,  because  they  ought  to  be  the  prime  of 
soldiers,  though  now  very  few  know  any  thing  of  it.  For  as  our  kings  of  old  did 
order  their  lands  and  tenements,  so  as  one  part  they  kept  and  detained  in  their 
own  hands,  and  in  them  stately  houses  and  castles  were  erected  and  made  for  tiieir 
habitation  and  defence  of  their  persons  and  of  the  realm,  also  forests  and  parks 
were  there  made  for  their  majesty's  recreation  ;  and  another  part  thereof  was  given 
to  the  nobles,  and  others  of  their  chivalry,  reserving  tenure  by  knights'  service. 
And  in  this  manner  the  nobles  also  dissipated  a  great  part  of  their  lands  to  the 
gentlemen  their  followers  to  hold   of  them    bv  knights'  service;  and  because  thi* 

Vol.  IL  3  O 


128  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

tenure  doth  concern  service  in  war,  the  tenants  are  therefore  called  milites  mtlitiar : 
For  though  the  word  doth  properly  signify  a  soldier,  and  yet  antiquity  hath  ap- 
propriated that  name  to  the  chiefest  of  military  profession,  and  in  all  our  old 
charters  they  are  stiled  milites,  and  never  equites,  yet  so  that  miles  is  taken  for  the 
self  same  that  chivalry  is.  And  they  also  in  other  places  are  stiled  equites,  horse- 
men, because  they  were  wont  to  serve  a-horseback ;  but  that  is  now  the  general 
denomination  of  all  knights,  whereas  these  we  are  speaking  of  are  stiled  equites 
aurati,  or  knights  of  the  gilt  spurs,  because  they  had  such  given  them  at  their 
creation.  For  this  reason,  when  a  knight  had  committed  a  capital  offence,  it  was 
usual  publicly  to  arm  him  cap-a-pee,  and  placed  on  a  high  scaffold  in  the  church, 
where  the  priest  sung  some  funeral  psalms  as  though  he  were  dead,  and  then  de- 
grade and  deprive  him  of  his  honour  of  knighthood,  which  was  done  by  taking  off 
his  helmet,  ungirding  his  military  belt,  taking  off  his  sword,  and  breaking  it  over 
his  head,  and  hewing  off  his  spurs  with  a  hatchet,  his  gauntlets  being  also  plucked 
from  him,  and  the  escutcheon  of  his  arms  was  also  reversed.  Sir  George  Mac- 
kenzie, in  his  Science  of  Heraldry,  page  78.  tells  us.  That  these  who  write  as  law- 
yers upon  the  subject  of  abatements  of  arms,  do  remark,  that  arms  are  diminished 
or  lost,  for  murder,  falsehood,  oppression,  false  witness,  and  a  profligate  life,  and 
that  they  are  many  several  ways  defaced  or  diminished,  such  as  abrasion,  perfora- 
tion. But  the  most  ordinary  way  for  treason  is  by  reversing  and  riving,  and  which 
Far.  also  observes  to  be  ordinary  in  case  of  treason,  De  crim.  les.  maj.  cap.  16. 
which  punishment  is  still  in  observance  by  the  laws  and  customs  of  North  Britain; 
for  when  any  person  is  forfeited  in  parHament,  the  Lyon,  and  his  brethren  heralds, 
come  in  with  their  coats  and  formalities,  and  the  Lyon  does  publicly  tear  the  arms 
of  the  person  forfeited ;  and  if  he  be  a  cadet  of  a  family,  he  says,  that  the  tearing 
of  these  arms  openly  shall  be  without  prejudice  to  the  nobleman  or  chief  whose 
arms  these  are;  after  which  he  and  his  brethren  go  to  the  cross,  and  there  he  hangs 
up  the  shield  reversed,  turning  the  base  or  lowest  point  upwards;  which  Decian, 
tract,  dim.  lib.  7.  cap.  31.  asserts  to  be  used  in  imitation  of  the  old  form  of  hang- 
ing traitors  by  the  feet;  • 

And  although  this  dignity  of  knighthood  had  its  original,  and  was  given  to  men 
of  war  and  prowess,  yet  in  all  successions  of  ages,  and  in  all  nations,  the  same  also 
is  bestowed  on  men  of  peace  by  the  sovereign  power  to  deserving  persons,  whereby 
the  service  of  the  commonwealth  at  home  is  made  equal  with  that  abroad.  For  as 
TuUy  saith  truly,  "  Parvi  sunt  arma  foris  nisi  est  concilium  domi."  But  experi- 
ence, the  faithfullest  counsellor,  and  best  mistress,  hath  made  it  manifest  both  in  this 
modern  age,  as  well  as  in  that  of  TuUy,  that  the  camp  hath  bred  more  eminent 
statesmen,  and  happily  as  good  politicians,  as  the  long  robe ;  perhaps  for  this  rea- 
son, one  aims  chiefly  at  glory  and  honour,  which  easily  attracts  admirers  and  fa- 
vourers, the  other  at  riches  and  indirect  negociations,  which  begets  envy  and 
private  enemies. 

He  that  is  to  receive  tiiis  dignity  of  knighthood  kneeleth  down  before  the  king 
of  his  commissioner,  who  slightly  smiteth  or  toucheth  him  upon  the  shoulder  with 
his  naked  sword  flatwise,  and  saith  unto  him  these  words  in  French,  Sois  Chevalier 
au  imii  de  Dieu,  or  Sis  Eques  in  nomine  Dei,  Be  a  knight  in  the  name  of  God  ;  and 
then  adds,  "  Advance  Chevalier,  rise  Sir  A.  B.  ;"  the  which  honour  does  not  de- 
scend to  the  posterity.  For  a  kniglrt  is  not  made  by  letters  patent,  or  by  the 
ki'ig's  writ,  as  those  of  higher  dignity,  but  by  the  sword  ;  for  this  honour  is  sup- 
posed to  be  given  on  the  sudden  ;  and  therefore  is  commonly  done  by  the  sword, 
(although  the  king  may  by  his  letters  patent  create  a  knight  as  he  doth  the  knights 
baronets)  which  we  commonly  call  dubbing,  the  old  English  word  used  for  creat- 
ing (consecrating)  a  knight,  from  doopen,  to  dip,  by  bathing.  There  is  also  men- 
tion (by  Mr  Selden)  of  consecrating  the  sword,  offering  it  at  the  altar,  and  receiv- 
ing it  again  from  thence,  as  an  implicit  kind  of  taking  an  oath.  But  as  in  peace 
and  great  leisure  these  tedious  ceremonies  were  of  old  used,  yet  it  was  otherwise 
in  times  of  war,  or  in  a  day  of  battle,  where  hurry  and  throng  of  affairs  would  not 
permit ;  and  therefore,  as  well  before  the  joining  of  battle,  as  after  victory  obtain- 
ed, it  was  usual  for  the  prince  or  general  in  the  field,  in  sight  of  the  army,  to  give 
those  whom  he  thought  tit  to  advance  to  that  honour,  (they  hvunhly  kneeling  be- 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  129 

tore  him,)  a  light  stroke  with  a  naked  sword  on  the  head  or  shoulder,  siiyiug  as 
above  narrated. 

Earls  in  ancient  jimes  had  a  power  of  knighting ;  but  now  neither  may  the 
prince,  or  any  other  of  the  nobility  (except  those  who  are  advanced  to  the  high 
degree  of  commissioner  to  parliament)  make  a  knight,  but  only  the  king  or  his  said 
commissioner,  who,  during  the  sederunt  of  our  Parliaments,  represented  his  majesty's 
person  when  absent  therefrom  in  England,  or  the  king's  lieutenant-general  by  his 
commission.  No  man  is  born  a  knight  with  us,  as  he  may  be  to  titles  of  honour 
by  patent;  and  even  the  eldest  sons  and  apparent  heirs-male  of  all  our  baronets  are 
ordained  at  the  age  of  twenty-one  years,  to  be  by  his  majesty  first  created  or  dub- 
bed eqiiites  aurati,  or  knights-batchelors,  before  they  take  on  the  title  of  bavonet  ; 
yet  this  they  now  very  often  neglect  to  do,  which  certainly  is  an  error.  Of  old, 
if  a  villain  was  made  a  knight,  he  was  immediately  enfranchised,  and  if  a  man  of 
base  birth  and  condition  did  strike  a  knight,  he  was  to  lose  his  hand.  And  knights 
in  all  foreign  countries,  says  the  author  of  Aiialogia  bononan,  subjoined  to  the  new 
edition  of  Mr  GuUlim's  Heraldry,  have  ever  place  and  precedency  according  to 
their  seniority  of  being  knighted,  which  privilege  is  denied  to  noblemen,  for 
be  they  never  so  ancient  in  foreign  countries,  they  shall  go  below  as  puisnes.  The 
degree  of  knighthood  is  not  only  a  dignity  and  honour  to  the  party,  but  an  honour 
to  the  kingdom  :  And  therefore  it  hath  been  an  ancient  prerogative  of  the  kings 
of  this  realm,  at  their  pleasure,  to  compel  men  of  worth  to  take  upon  them  that 
degree,  upon  payment  of  a  fine.  But  now  we  see  by  experience  in  these  days, 
that  none  are  compelled  thereto,  and  there  is  so  little  belongs  to  knights  now,  that 
more  need  not  be  said  of  them  ;  for  to  search  out  what  was,  and  has  now  ceased 
to  be,  is  little  to  the  purpose. 

By  the  statute  made  in  England  the  twenty-fourth  year  of  the  reign  of  King 
Henry  VIII.  cap,  13.  entitled,  yln  Act  for  Rejormation  of  Apparel,  it  was  permit- 
ted for  knights  to  wear  a  collar  of  gold,  named  the  collar  of  SS,  which  no  doubt 
became  also  customable  here.  And  in  regard  whereof  I  judge  it  no  irregularity,  but 
rather  very  fit  and  convenient  for  all  knights-batchelors,  as  a  cognosce  and  badge 
in  their  armorial  bearings,  to  trim  and  outwardly  adorn  their  shields  of  arms  with 
the  said  collar. 

So  much  then  for  placing  of  collars  and  badges  of  knighthood  round  the  es- 
cutcheon of  arms,  forbearing  to  give  a  description  of  these  many  other  orders  of 
knighthood  in  Europe,  as  out  of  my  road,  since  the  situation  and  position  of  them  in 
armories  is  after  the  same  method  as  those  that  I  have  above  described,  except  a  few, 
which  1  shall  hereafter  mention  ;  yet  before  I  close  with  the  collar,  it  is  not  amiss 
I  give  my  reader  the  following  observe,  that  in  pristine  times  none  but  kings  and 
princes  wore  collars  ;  and  therefore  their  use  seems  to  be  of  dignity  and  power,  as 
is  evident  from  Daniel,  where  the  Assyrian  kings  used  this  ornament.  After- 
wards men  famous  for  wisdom  and  counsel  had  them  as  a  distinguishing  badge,  as 
in  the  example  of  Joseph,  Gen.  xli.  42.  and  from  the  proclamation  of  Belshazzav 
King  of  Babylon,  who  proposed  it  as  a  premium  to  him  that  would  interpret  the 
hand-writing  upon  the  wall,  Daniel,  v.  7.  And  men  famous  for  military  achieve- 
ments had  it  conferred  upon  them,  in  recompense  of  their  merits  ;  thus  collars 
wereof  the  number  of  the  dona  et  prcemia  mUitaria  among  the  Romans,  and  the 
honour  of  receiving  them  thought  worthy  to  be  consigned  to  posterity  in  marble 
inscriptions.  From  them  the  latter  emperors  received  it,  and  we  read  of  investing 
a  Knight  of  the  Holy  Sepulchre  with  a  collar  at  his  creation  ;  where,  as  soon  as 
the  ceremony  of  his  ordination  is  over,  the  Padre  guardian  kisses  the  new  made 
knight,  and  puts  about  his  neck  (according  to  the  mode  of  the  ancients)  a  golden 
collar,  with  a  cross  hanging  at  it.  Most  aptly  therefore  have  the  sovereigns  of  mi- 
litary orders  annexed  this  ornament  of  the  collar  to  their  habit,  and  conferred  it  on 
the  fellows  and  companions  who  have  meritoriously  deserved  it,  in  respect  of  their 
wisdom  or  valour.  There  were  other  ensigns  of  knighthood  that  could  not  go 
round  the  shield,  which  shall  be  taken  notice  of  afterwards. 

I  shall  next  a  little  insist  on  other  figures  made  use  of  in  adorning  arms  exteri- 
orly, by  surrounding  the  armorial  shield,  which  by  the  by  were  never  esteemed  to 
be  particular  marks  of  dignity,  but  only  ornaments  of  the  escutcheon,  such  as  the 
ardelier,  laqs  cC  amcur,  and  garlands. 


!3Q 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


And  ftrst,  As  to  the  cordelier,  it  is  a  cord  of  many  running  knots,  which  Monsieur 
Baron  says  is  an  adornment  only  proper  for  wives  or  married  women  to  use  round 
their  arms ;  and  agani  the  said  author,  in  his  Art  of  Heraldry,  p.  194.  describes 
the  same  thus,  Conleiihe,  qui  entoure  fecusson  des femmes,  or  scutum  funiculo  variis 
iw.ilicato  nodis  cinctum,  in  varios  funiculo  implexum  modos. 

It  hath  its  rise  from  that  cord  used  by  St  Francis  about  his  body ;  and  Francis 
Duke  of  Bretagne,  for  the  devotion  and  reverence  he  had  to  this  saint,  placed 
such  a  cord  of  that  fashion  round  the  escutcheon  of  his  arms.  And  upon  the 
same  respect,  Francis  I.  King  of  France  placed  such  another  round  the  diadem  of 
that  saint  for  his  device,  with  this  motto,  Plus  qu'  autre,  that  is,  more  than  any. 
By  which  it  seems  he  would  have  said,  that  he  reverenced  St  Francis,  whose  name 
he  carried,  more  than  any  saint.  And  without  .doubt  this  was  (says  Menestrier) 
the  chief  reason  which  moved  him  to  change  the  old  form  of  the  collar  of  St  Mich- 
ael to  a  twisted  one  like  the  cordelier.  And  at  this  day  several  prelates  of  the 
Order  of  St  Francis  make  use  of  the  cordelier  to  surround  their  arms. 

That  which  brought  it  in  use  chiefly  amongst  women  was  the  great  affection  Anne 
of  Bretagne,  Qiieen  to  Charles  VIII.  King  of  France  had  to  it,  in  imitation  of  her 
father  Francis  Duke  of  Bretagne  ;  she  used  always  a  cordelier  round  her  arms,  de-  . 
vices,  and  crown  ;  and  her  daughter  Madam  Claudia  of  France,  who  was  married 
to  Francis  I.  King  of  France,  did  the  same  ;  and  Louisa  of  Savoy,  and  other  great 
ladies,  did  so  far  imitate  them  therein,  that  the  practice  of  placing  the  cordelier 
round  arms  became  frequent  with  all  ladies  of  quality  ;  and  being  a  pretty  device 
or  rebus  for  widows,  made  it  more  generally  frequent,  to  show  that  they  have  corps 
delie,  that  is,  their  body  free  and  untied  ;  the  rebus  proceeding  from  the  pronun- 
ciation of  corps  dilie,  or  cordelier. 

Secondly,  As  to  the  love -knot,  or  laqs  d' amour,  as  it  is  in  figure  very  like  the 
cordelier,  so  it  is  only  made  use  of  by  women,  in  surrounding  or  adorning  out- 
wardly their  arms,  for  Monsieur  Baron,  in  his  Art  of  Heraldry,  page  204.  narrates, 
that  "  Laqs  d'  amour,  qui  entourent  les  armoiries  des  veuves  &-  des  fiUes  ;"  or, 
"  Nodi  amatorii  scuta  circumdantes." 

Before  the  use  of  the  cordelier,  the  most  part  of  arms,  as  well  of  women  as  men, 
were  svirrounded  with  garlands  of  leaves  and  flowers,  as  the  Grecians  and  Romans 
adorned  their  statutes  with  ;  and  they  were  these  garlands  (says  Menestrier)  which 
they  called  stemtnata.  In  many  old  illuminate  books  of  arms  that  I  have  perused  are  to 
be  seen  sundry  armorial  bearings  so  trimmed  as  to  have  garlands  surrounding  the 
escutcheon  :  And  in  old  pieces  of  painting,  in  many  places  with  us,  I  have  ob- 
served the  hke  practice.  The  last  instance  hereof  that  I  met  with  were  these  of 
the  arms  of  the  surname  of  Laing,  which  I  saw  surrounded  with  a  garland  in  the 
mansion-house  of  Redhouse  in  East  Lothian. 

In  imitation  of  these  garlands  and  chaplets,  those  in  religious  orders,  as  well  men 
as  women,  placed  round  their  arms  crowns  or  wreaths  of  thorns,  to  show  that  their 
profession  was  a  state  of  austerities  and  mortification,  and  sometimes  placed  chap- 
lets  oi pater  nosters,  to  manifest  their  devotion. 

Anciently  there  was  another  ornament,  which  I  observe  environed  shields  of 
arms,  particularly  to  be  met  with  on  seals  formed  by  three  semi-circles,  like  a  tre- 
foil, or  by  four,  and  many  times  a  great  many  more,  like  to  a  rose  united  together 
by  their  points.  This  ornament  had  its  rise  from  the  reverse  of  old  seals  or  private 
seals,  where  the  shield  of  arms  was  placed  as  it  were  upon  a  rose,  the  emblem  of 
secrecy,  being  most  beautiful,  when  least  opened  or  spread,  for  which  to  keep  any 
saying  secret,  they  say,  sub  rosa.  And  in  foreign  books  of  heraldry,  I  have  seen 
several  figures  of  the  whole  achievements  of  sundry  princes  and  dukes  abroad,  trim- 
med all  within  an  ornament  of  eight  semi-circles. 

And  afterwards,  and  in  imitation  of  these  semi-circles  Joined  together  like  to  a 
rose  round  the  shield,  came  (in  succeeding  ages)  the  custom  and  practice  of  placing 
the  collars  of  knighthood  about  the  escutcheon,  and  other  badges  of  honour  that 
could  surround  it,  as  chains  of  gold,  ribbons,  &c.     Of  which  before. 

As  for  the  other  ensigns  of  knighthood  that  could  not  go  round  the  shield,  and 
which  I  promised  to  speak  to,  they  were  either  placed  below  the  shield,  as  that  of 
the  order  of  the  crescent  or  half-moon,  instituted  by  Rene  of  Anjou,  brother  and 
heir  to  Lewis  III.  King  of  Naples,  in   the  year  1464,  who  settled  the  sovereignty 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


'31 


thereof  upon  himself  and  his  heirs,  Dukes  of  Anjou  and  Kings  of  Sicily.  The 
badge  or  device  of  the  order  was  a  crescent  of  gold,  on  which  tliis  word  los  was 
enamelled  in  red  letters :  It  imported,  los  en  croissant,  that  is,  praise  by  in- 
creasing; this  the  knights  wore  on  the  right  side  of  their  cloaks  or  upper  gar- 
ments, and  in  their  armoiies  placed  the  same  below  their  escutcheons  ;  and  to  this 
crescent  were  fastened  as  many  tags  of  gold  enamelled  with  red,  as  the  knight 
that  wore  it  had  been  present  at  battles,  sieges  of  towns,  and  such  like  memorable, 
actions.  But  this  order  is  now  extinct;  for  princes  of  small  power  cannot  lix  these 
honours  so  strongly  as  those  of  greater  might  ;  besides,  the  irlouse  of  Anjou  never 
had  quiet  possession  of  Naples  or  Sicily,  but  were  still  expelled  as  fast  as  they  came 
ill ;  so  that  the  order  could  not  subsist,  when  the  crown  tailed  upon  which  it  was 
founded. 

Others  again  place  the  badge  within  the  shield,  as  those  of  the  Order  of  St  John 
of  Jerusalem,  Knights  of  Malta,  or  Knights  Hospitallers  of  St  John  of  Jerusalem. 
Before  the  taking  oi  Jerusalem  from  the  Saracens,  certain  Christian  merchants 
of  Naples  obtained  leave  from  the  Caliph  of  Egypt  to  erect  a  small  and  convenient 
house  for  entertainment  of  themselves  and  countrymen,  which  they  built  before 
the  church  of  the  Holy  Sepulchre,  together  with  a  small  oratory  ;  to  them  repair- 
ed certain  canons  of  the  Order  of  St  Augustine,  who  built  another  oratory,  and  to 
distinguish  them  from  the  Knights  of  the  Holy  Sepulchre,  they  took  the  black 
habit  of  the  Hermits  of  St  Augustine.  Jerusalem  being  afterwards  taken  by  the 
Christians,  Baldwin  I.  of  the  name.  King  of  Jerusalem,  created  them  Knights  of 
St  John  of  Jerusalem,  to  entertain  and  lodge  pilgrims  to  defend  the  Holy  Land  ; 
as  also  for  tliat  they  took  St  John  Baptist  for  their  patron  they  obtained  tiiat  title. 
It  was  instituted,  says  Ashmole,  anno  1092,  others  say,  anno  1099,  by  Gerard  a 
native  of  Thoulouse,  who  came  to  Jerusalem  in  the  time  of  Godfrey  of  Boulogne, 
and  built  this  hospital,  which  became  the  first  seat  of  this  order,  and  dedicated  it  to 
St  John  of  Cyprus,  Bishop  of  Alexandria,  commonly  called  Joannes  Elemosynarius, 
and  the  said  King  Baldwin  I.  conferred  on  them  large  privileges,  permitting  them 
arms,  and  instituting  them  to  be  knights,  anno  1104,  their  duty  being  to  fight 
against  the  infidels,  being  first  obedient  to  the  Patriarch  of  Jerusalem.  Pope  Ge- 
lasius  II.  or  Calixtus  II.  anno  1120,  confirmed  their  rule  of  living  ;  and  after  popes 
received  them  under  the  protection  of  the  papal  bce,  and  endowed  them  with  ample 
privileges,  exempting  them  from  payment  of  tithes,  St-c:  on  the  breast  of  their  ha- 
bit (being  black)  they  wore  at  first  a  plain  cross  of  white  cloth,  which  afterwards 
was  changed  to  one  with  eight  points,  to  represent  the  eight  beatitudes  ;  but  in 
war  they  used  a  red  cassock,  bearing  the  white  cross  upon  it  :  and  in  their  ban- 
ners or  ensigns  they  wore  a  crimson  or  red  coat  of  arms  with  the  said  white  cross 
upon  it  ;  but  in  their  monasteries  they  wore  the  black  garment  only.  To  Gerard 
succeeded  Raymond,  who  enlarged  their  laws  and  institutions,  and  was  stiled 
Raimundus  Dei  gratia  servus  pauperum  Jesii  Christi  et  custos  hospitalis  Jerusalymi- 
tani ;  but  afterwards  he  and  his  successors  had  the  title  of  Great  Master  of  the  Or- 
der given  tliem,  to  denote  their  power  and  authority.  When  they  were  driven 
out  of  Palestine  they  removed  into  Cyprus,  and  anno  1309,  to  the  Isle  of  Rhodes; 
out  of  which  being  expelled  by  Soljman  the  Magnificent,  Emperor  of  the  Turks, 
anno  1522,  they  removed  from  one  place  to  another,  till  at  last  by  the  munificence 
of  Charles  V.  anno  1530,  they  were  settled  in  Malta.  At  this  day  their  Great 
Master  has  the  title  of  Prince  of  Malta  and  Goza  ;  Tripoli  and  Goxa  were  granted 
to  them  in  fee  by  the  Emperor  Charles  V.  anno  1530,  under  the  tender  of  one 
falcon  yearly  to  the  Viceroy  of  Sicily.  Among  his  privileges  he  seals  in  lead,  as 
does  the  Pope  and  Doge  of  Venice  ;  he  acknowledges  the  Pope  for  his  head,  and 
the  King  of  Spain  and  Sicily  for  his  patron,  or  for  their  protectors.  In  this  isle 
they  continue  a  bulwark  to  those  parts,  and  from  this  their  settlement  are  called 
Knights  of  Malta.  None  are  admitted  to  this  order  but  such  as  can  bring  a  testi- 
mony of  their  gentility  for  six  descents ;  when  the  Great  Master  dies,  they  sutler 
no  vessel  to  go  out  of  the  island  till  another  is  chosen,  lest  the  Pope  should  inter- 
fere in  their  election,  who  being  chosen,  is  stiled  the  Mo^t  Illustrious  and  Most  Re- 
verend Prince,  the  Lord  Frier  N.  N.  Great  Master  of  the  Hospital  of  St  John  of 
Jerusalem,  Prince  of  Malta,  Gaules,  and  Goza.  These  knights  are  in  number  one 
thousand,  of  whom  five  hundred  are  always  to  be  resident  in  the  island,  the  other 

Vol.  II.  3  E 


132  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

five  hundred  are  dispersed  through  Christendom  at  their  several  seminaries  in-Spain-; 
Germany,  Italy,  and  France,  and  at  any  summons  are  to  make  then-  personal  ap- 
pearance ;  these  seminaries  (called  by  them  Alberges)  are  seven  in  number,  one  of 
Castile,  one  of  Arragon,  one  of  Germany,  one  of  Italy,  one  of  France  in  general; 
one  of  Auvergne,  one  of  Provence,  over  every  one  of  which  they  have  a  Grand 
Prior,  who  in  the  country  where  he  liveth  is  of  great  reputation ;  an  eighth  semi- 
nary they  had  m  England,  till  the  suppression  of  it  by  King  Henry  VIII.  yet  they 
have  some  one  or  other  to  whom  they  give  still  the  title  of  Grand  Prior  of  Eng- 
land ;  they  had  at  one  time  in  several  parts  of  Christendom  no  fewer  than  20,000 
manors.     The  knights  of  this  order  bear  gules,  a  cross  argent. 

The  Lord  Prior  ot  this  Order  in  England  was  accounted  the  prime  baron  in  the 
realm,  and  some  here  had  also  the  addition  of  Great,  and  was  stiled  Prior  Hospita- 
lis  Sti  Johannis  Jerusalem  in  Anglia,  and  by  that  title  was  he  summoned  to  the 
Parliament  as  a  iDaron  of  that  kingdom,  and  at  length,  tor  place  and  precedency, 
was  ranked  the  first  baron  ;  the  Knights  Templars  were  suppressed  by  Pope  Cle- 
ment V.  about  the  year  1310,  and  their  lands  were  (by  a  general  council  held  at 
Vienna)  conferred  on  the  knights  of  the  Order  of  St  John  of  Jerusalem,  called 
fonnnites,  after  knights  of  Rhodes,  and  now  knights  of  Malta.  These  Knights. 
Templars  and  their  successors,  the  said  knights  of  St  John,  they  had  only  one 
house  or  manor  here  in  Scotland,  which  was  the  Hospital  of  St  Germains  in  Lo- 
thian ;  but  this  house  was  dissolved  anno  1494,  and  the  greatest  part  of  its  re- 
venues was,  by  King  James  IV.  conferred  upon  the  King's  College  of  Aberdeen, 
then  newly  founded  by  William  Elphingston,  Bishop  of  Aberdeen.  Torphichen,  in 
the  shire  of  Mid-Lothian,  did  also  belong  to  the  knights  of  this  Order  of  St  J&hn ; 
and  Mr  Crawfurd,  in  his  Peerage  of  Scotland,  page  86.  tells  us,  that  Sir  Walter  Lind- 
say, (a  son  of  the  Lord  Lindsay)  Preceptor  of  Torphichen,  was  Lord  St  John  in  the 
reign  of  King  James  V.  And  again,  ihid.  page  479,  Sir  James  Sandilands,  the  first 
Lord  Torphichen,  being  a  young  man  of  good  parts,  and  bred  a  scholar,  was,  by 
the  said  Sir  Walter  Lindsay  Lord  St  John  recommended  to  the  Great  Master  of 
the  Order  of  the  Knights  of  Malta,  as  a  person  well  qualified  to  be  his  successor  in 
the  preceptory  of  Torphichen.  And  Mr  Sandiland's  travelling  into  those  parts^ 
and  having  resided  for  some  years  at  the  Isle  of  Malta,  he  gave  such  proofs  of  his 
learning  and  sufficiency  for  the  discharge  of  that  function,  that  he  was  with  all 
the  necessary  forms  received  by  the  Grand  Prior  of  the  Hospital  and  his  chapter,  to 
be  one  of  the  knights  of  that  ancient  military  order,  and  inaugurated  future  suc- 
cessor to  the  said  Sir  Walter  Lindsay,  by  whose  death,  in  the  year  1543,  he  was 
fully  invested  in  the  title,  power,  and  jurisdiction  of  Lord  St  John  of  Jerusalem  in 
Scotland,  and  succeeded  in  the  possession  of  the  revenue  thereof,  vdiich  was  very 
great,  and  spread  through  the  whole  kingdom  ;  so  that  it  is  hereby  apparent  we 
had  our  Prior  Hospitalis  Sti.  Johannis  Jerusalem  in  Scotia,  as  well  as  they  had  in 
England,  and  by  that  title  sat  he  in  our  Parliaments  as  a  lord  or  baron  of  the 
kingdom.  But  at  the  Reformation  here  in  Scotland,  the  said  Lord  St  John  re- 
nounced popery,  and  embraced  the  protestant  religion  ;  and  having  resigned  the 
lordship  of  St  John  in  the  hands  of  Qiieen  Mary,  her  highness  was  graciously 
pleased,  in  consideration  of  Sir  James's  great  merit  and  services,  to  grant  and 
dispone  heritably  to  him,  his  heirs  and  assignees,  the  foresaid  lordship  and  pre- 
ceptory of  Torphichen,  for  the  sum  of  ten  thousand  crowns  of  the  sun,  which  he 
presently  paid  down,  besides  an  yearly  annuity  of  five  hundred  merks,  which  was 
then  erected  into  the  lordship  of  Torphichen,  by  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal, 
dated  the  24th  of  January  1563. 

The  third  and  last  way  of  placing  badges  of  knighthood  in  armories  is  behind 
the  shield,  a  practice  used  by  the  Knights  of  the  Order  of  Avis  in  Portugal. 
Don  Alphonso  Henriquez,  first  King  of  Portugal,  took  from  the  Moors,  ^/;/?o  Dom. 
1 147,  the  city  of  Evora,  and,  to  strengthen  it,  sent  thither  several  gallant  com- 
manders, who  assumed  the  title  of  Knights  of  St  iSIary  of  Evora,  putting  themselves 
under  the  protection  of  our  blessed  lady ;  and  not  long  after  they  were  called  d"Avis, 
from  a  castle  upon  the  Portuguese  frontiers  conquered  from  the  Moors,  whither 
they  transplanted  themselves.  It  was  confirmed  by  Pope  Innocent  III.  A.  D.  1204, 
under  the  rule  of  St  Benedict,  and  therefore  in  some  papal  rules  called  of  St  Be- 
nedict d'Avis.     The  knights  profess  conjugal  chastity  and  obedience;   anno  1213, 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  1,33 

they  submitted  themselves  to  the  rule,  statutes,  and  visitation  of  the  Order  of  Cala- 
tiava.  But  in  the  time  of  John  of  Portugal  (natural  son  to  Pedro  K-ing  of  Porta- 
gal)  VII.  Great  Master  d'Avis,  they  cast  otf  their  acknowledgment  to  Calatrava, 
and  never  after  submitted  to  thejn;  and  afterwards  when  the  crown  of  Portugal 
fell  into  the  hands  of  Philip  II.  King  of  Spain,  this  order  was  governed  according 
to  the  statutes  of  Portugal.  They  must  be  gentlemen  by  extraction,  both  of  the 
father's  and  m.other's  side.  This  order  still  subsists,  and  carry  for  theu'  badge  a 
green  cross  fleury,  such  as  the  knights  of  Alcantara  used  to  wear.  And  in 
their  arms,  place  the  said  cross  pale-ways  behind  the  middle  of  their  armorial 
shields. 

But  to  come  to  a  close  of  this  chapter,  I  shall  only  observe,  that  at  present 
it  is  ordinary  for  persons  of  quality,  especially  women,  to  place  two  branches  of 
palm-tree  at  the  sides  of  their  arms,  and  this  ornament  is  the  symbol  of  con- 
jugal love,  v.hich  the  ancients  did  represent  by  the  male  and  female  palm- 
tiee. 


CHAP.   xn. 

OF    THE    CajWARTiMENT. - 

THE  compartment  is  that  figure  upon  which  the  shield  and  supporters  usually 
stand  or  rest,  and  very  frequently  therein  is  inserted  the  name  and  desig- 
nation of  the  bearer,  and  when  the  person  carries  more  mottos  or  epigraphs  than 
one,  if  any  of  them  relate  to  the  supporters  or  arms,  then  they  are  commonly  and 
most  properly  placed  on  the  compartment  below  ;  but  if  the  same  is  entirely  re- 
lative to  the  crest,  the  same  most  regularly  ought  always  to  be  placed  in  an  escrol 
above  it. 

The  compartment  is  of  no  fixed  form  in  heraldry,  neither  by  our  practice  at 
home,  nor  yet  abroad;  for  sometimes,  and  that  very  frequently,  it  is  formed  like 
an  escrol  in  order  to  contain  more  aptly  a  second  motto  ;  and  at  other  times  it  is 
formed  like  an  oblong  oval,  wherein  either  to  insert  the  motto  or  designation  of  the 
person  to  whom  the  arms  belong  :  and  seeing  there  is  no  stated  rule  hereanent  in 
the  Science  of  Heraldry,  it  is  now  customarily  drawn  after  whatever  form  the 
painters  or  engravers  of  armorial  achievements  think  best  and  fittest,  and  which, 
they  commonly  embellish  with  various  flourishes,  foldeshes,  and  running  .leaves, 
in  order  to  adorn  their  work  and  performance.  But  as  the  compartment  is  neither 
a  proper  nor  regular  piece  of  armory,  so  neither  can  I  say  that  it  is  very  ancient ; 
for  upon  old  seals  there  is  no  such  thing  to  be  seen.  And  in  those  ages  when 
shields  of  arms  w  ere  represented  couche,  there  was  no  compartment  needful ;  for 
they  hung  always  by  the  left  corner,  and  the  supporters  belonging  thereto  com- 
monly stood  on  the  sides  of  the  shield,  and  it  is  to  be  observed  did  not  support  the 
same  as  the  practice  now  is,  but  only  supported  the  casque  or  hebnet  placed  on  the 
top  thereof. 

In  later  times,  when  shields  of  arms  were  erect  and  supported,  then  there  was 
subjoined  a  compartment  for  them  to  stand  and  rest  upon,  which,  in  old  paintings, 
were  ordinarily  formed  like  to  terraces  or  pieces  of  green  land  with  hills  and 
turrets  appearing,  with  flowers  and  trees  growing  out  of  them  for  the  greater  or- 
nament of  the  figure,  as  may  be  yet  seen  in  some  of  our  old  illuminated  books 
of  arms ;  and  the  like  practice  is  also  to  be  seen  on  some  ancient  seals.  And  iiere- 
upon  our  learned  countryman.  Sir  George  Mackenzie,  in  his  Science  of  Heraldry, 
page  95.  took  occasion  to  say,  that  though  none  have  offered  to  conjecture  what 
gave  the  first  occasion  to  compartments  in  heraldry,  yet  I  conceive  (says  he)  that 
the  compartment  represents  the  bearers'  lands  and  territories,  though  sometimes 
they  are  bestowed  in  recompense  of  some  honourable  action.  And  for  an  example 
to  prove  this  assertion,  he  gives  us  an  instance  of  the  earls  of  Douglas  who  got 
the  privilege  of  having  their  supporters  to  stand  within  a  pale  of  wood  wreathed, 
because  the  Lord  Douglas,  in  the  reign  of  King  Robert  the  Bruce,  did  defeat  the 
English  in  Jedburgh  Forest,  and  that  they  might  not  escape,  caused  wreath  and 


134  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

impale  in  the  night  that  part  of  the  wood  by  which  he  conjectui'ed  they  might 
make  their  escape. 

I  am  much  of  the  opinion  with  this  great  man,  that  such  compartments  repre- 
sented the  bearer's  lands  and  territories,  and  that  the  said  wreathed  pale  of  wood, 
is  still  used  by  that  noble  family  to  perpetuate  that  memorable  action  of  the  Dou- 
glas above  mentioned;  and  which  opmion  will  be  the  more  confirmed  by  the  prac- 
tice of  this  ancient  house  who  were  proprietors  of  Jedburgh  Forest,  as  by  their 
charters  with  their  seals  appended  to  two  of  them,  which  1  shall  here  mention, 
(though  I  narrated  the  same  before  in  my  blazon  of  the  arms  of  the  family)  and  de- 
scribe according  as  I  saw  them  in  the  custody  of  our  late  curious  antiquary  Mr 
David  Simpson. 

William,  the  first  Earl  of  Douglas  and  Earl  of  Marr,  by  marrying  the  heiress 
thereof  grants  a  charter  of  the  lands  of  Easter  Foulis  in  the  earldom  of  Marr  and 
shire  of  Aberdeen,  to  James  Montcalto,  i.e.  Mowat,  dated  at  the  Castle  of  Kil- 
drumy,  the  12th  of  July  1377,  to  which  was  appended  his  seal,  whereon  is  the 
arms  of  Douglas  and  Marr,  quarterly,  within  a  shield  couche,  supported  by  one 
lion,  with  his  head  in  the  helmet,  sitting  on  a  compartment  like  to  a  rising  ground, 
with  a  tree  growing  out  of  it,  and  seme  of  hearts,  mollets,  and  cross  croslets,  the 
armorial  figures  of  this  earl's  arms,  to  show,  very  probably,  that  this  compartment 
represented  his  lands  and  tenitories. 

The  other  was  the  charter  of  his  grandson,  James  Douglas,  the  second  Earl  of  An- 
gus, of  the  lands  of  Stukerland  in  the  sheriffdom  of  Perth,  granted  by  him  to  Ro- 
bert Imrie  or  Ymbrie,  dated  at  Tamtallan  the  bth  of  May  1434;  on  this  earl's  seal 
hereto  appended  on  a  shield  couche,  is  quarterly,  first,  a  lion  rampant  ;  second,  the 
arms  of  Douglas ;  third,  the  arms  of  Stewart  of  Bonkill  and  Angus ;  and,  the 
fourth,  the  arms  of  Abernethy  timbred  with  an  helmet  and  capehne  ;  and,  for 
crest,  a  plume  of  feathers,  supported  on  the  right  side  by  a  deer,  and,  on  the  left,, 
by  a  woman  in  a  rich  habit,  both  standing  on  the  shield  and  holding  the  helmet, 
which  the  woman  does  by  the  capeline ;  and  the  whole  achievement  is  surrounded 
with  a  pale  of  wood  wreathed,  such  as  that  now  used  by  his  successor  the  Duke  of 
Douglas,  as  a  compartment  under  his  armorial  bearing,  and  on  the  outer  circle  of 
this  seal  are  these  words,  Sig,  Jacobi  Comitis  Anguisia  Bom.  de  Abernethie  'iiS  Jed- 
worth  Jorest. 

It  is  probable  these  compartments  of  the  Douglases  do  represent  and  perpetuate 
the  one  their  feus,  and  the  other  a  noble  action  of  one  of  their  family;  yet  1  have 
not  met  with  any  other  arms  of  our  ancient  and  noble  families  with  such  special 
compartments,  though  some  do  represent  pieces  of  ground  for  their  noble  feus,  as 
on  the  seals  of  the  Earls  of  Crawford,  and  the  Lords  of  Hamilton,  now  dukes,  as  in 
Sir  George  Mackenzie's  Science  of  Heraldry,  page  95.  where  he  hath  given  us  two 
figures  cut  on  copper,  one  of  the  seal  of  James  Lord  Hamilton,  the  other  that  of 
David  de  Lindsay,  Earl  of  Crawford,  both  of  whose  shields  of  arms  are  couche, 
their  supporters  bearing  up  the  helmet  according  to  the  custom  of  that  age,  and 
both  standing  on  a  terrace  as  a  compartment  thereto  ;  and  several  other  old  seals  I 
have  seen  trimmed  after  this  method;  and  especially  this  practice  is  to  be  met  with 
in  many  illuminated  books  of  blazons;  but  1  have  observed  none  of  them  strewed 
with  any  armorial  figures  (which  certainly  is  the  best  method  to  be  used  for  appro- 
priating" them  to  particular  famihes)  like  that  of  William,  first  Earl  of  Douglas,  I, 
just  now  mentioned.  And,  except  these  instances,  I  meet  with  no  other  examples 
with  us,  save  that  of  the  noble  family  of  Drummond  Earls  of  Perth,  whose  com- 
partment, as  the  former,  is  represented  by  a  green  hill,  seme  of  caltrapes,  which, 
with  the  motto  of  the  family,  viz.  gang  warily,  is  a  pretty  device.  And  the  an- 
cient family  of  M'Farlane,  the  chief  of  that  nan'ie,  carrieth  in  their  armorial  achieve- 
ments a  particular  compartment,  wavey  (whereon  their  supporters  stand)  in  repre- 
sentation of  Lochsloy,  being  a  place  in  the  Arrochar  where  this  clan  generally  ren- 
dezvous themselves  before  a  battle,  and  on  the  said  compartment  have  also  the 
word  Lochsloy,  which  is  the  M'Farlane's  cri  de  guerre  or  slughorn  ;  as  also  Ogilvie 
of  Innerquharity  hath  his  arms  trimmed  and  cut  (in  the  Plates  of  Achievements 
subjoined  to  the  First  Volume  of  this  my  System  of  Heraldry)  with  another  par- 
ticular compartment,  to  wit,  the  representation  of  a  green  hill  or  rising  terrace,  on 
which  is  placed  two  serpents  nowed,  spouting  out  fire,  proper,  and  thereon  his  sup- 


EXTERIOR  ORN AMEN'i'y .  135 

porters  doth  stand,  and  below  the  same,  within  the  said  terrace,  is  this  motto,  Ter- 
rena  pericula  sperno,  which  is  a  very  good  device.  In  the  English  books  of  he- 
raldry I  meet  with  no  nobleman  or  gentleman  that  carry  in  their  armorial  bearings 
particular  compartments. 

And  yet  I  am  still  of  opinion  tluit  compartments,  of  whatsoever  form  they  be, 
are  none  of  the  proper  parts  of  the  achievement  accounted  for  by  any  herald  that 
1  have  met  with,  foreign  or  domestic;  yet  I  see  nothing  against  the  usage  of  them, 
but  that  they  may  for  a  decorament  be  used  by  all  those  families  who  have  right 
to  carry  arms,  and  particularly  families  who  have  for  a  long  time  possessed  an- 
cient baronies  may  place  them  on  compartments  to  represent  their  feus,  and  may 
also  have  the  same  seme  of  their  armorial  figures,  if  they  be  agreeable  to  such  a 
disposition. 

As  for  the  figures  of  creatures  placed  under  the  achievements,  they  cannot  pro- 
perly be  called  compartments,  but  rather  devices,  as  I  have  shown  before.  And 
their  position  in  arn\ories  is  ordinarily  by  placing  them  sometimes  at  the  sides  of 
the  shield,  or  below  the  same,  and  may  be  used  by  any  noble  or  ancient  family 
that  hath  right  to  adorn  and  support  their  arms.  As  for  the  salamander  in  flames, 
proper,  which  the  ancient  family  of  Dundas  of  that  Ilk  carry  below  their  arms, 
and  the  hart's  head  cabossed,  which  Sir  George  Mackenzie,  in  his  Science  of  He- 
raldry, page  88.  places  below  the  shield  of  the  coat  of  Denham  of  old,  which  he 
there  hath  caused  to  be  cut  so,  no  doubt  from  an  ancient  seal  or  piece  of  painting- 
he  hath  seen  ;  and  the  blazing  star  which  Captain  Robert  Seaton  places  also  be- 
low his  shield,  with  the  motto  Luceo  boreale,  I  esteem  them  only  but  devices,  and 
are  very  far  from  the  use  and  nature  of  a  compartment  in  my  opinion.  And  the 
wild  man  lying  in  chains  under  the  escutcheon  of  Robertson  of  Struan,  which  has 
been  carried  by  this  ancient  family  for  a  long  time,  to  perpetuate  a  dutiful  and 
loyal  action  performed  by  one  of  their  predecessors  in  apprehending  one  of  the  mur- 
derers of  King  James  I.  cannot  be  rightly  called  a  compartment,  but  more  pro- 
perly an  honourable  supporter.  For  as  I  have  shown  before  that  the  achievements 
of  the  greatest  families  in  Europe  have  had  but  one  supporter  of  old,  and  particularly 
amongst  ourselves,  which  I  could  demonstrate  by  many  examples  from  old  seals, 
so  I  have  also  seen  the  royal  arms  of  Scotland  itself  represented  in  several  places 
v.'ith  only  one  supporter;  and,  to  confirm  this,  upon  the  Nether-Bow  steeple  in  Edin- 
burgh, they  may  be  yet  perceived  cut  in  stone,  just  standing  upon  the  back  of 
an  unicorn,  in  like  manner  as  Struan's  armorial  shield  do  upon  the  said  wild 
man. 

Neither  have  I  met  with  any  special  compartments  upon  which  the  achieve- 
ments of  sovereign  princes  do  stand,  at  home  or  abroad,  taken  notice  of  by  any 
herald.  And  even  these  of  the  kings  of  Scotland  and  England  are  commonly 
formed  much  after  the  common  ones  used  by  their  nobles,  except  only  that  they 
have  frequently  this  difference,  that  out  from  them  there  issueth  the  badges  of 
their  dominions,  viz.  the  thistle  for  Scotland,  and  the  rose  for  England.  The  royal 
achievement  of  France  is  placed  by  some  upon  such  a  compartment,  and  by 
others  on  that  of  different  forms  as  they  think  most  fit  and  proper.  And  Mon- 
sieur Baron,  in  his  U Art  Heraldique,  places  it  upon  a  plain  cheque  of  square  pieces 
of  marble,  azure  and  argent,  on  the  first  a  flower-de-luce,  and  on  the  second  the 
letter  L,  ensigned  with  an  imperial  crown.  And  the  same  author  places  the 
achievements  of  Phihppe  de  France  Due  d'Orleans,  and  Monsieur  Le  Due  de 
Roquelaure,  upon  a  plain  piece  of  ground,  as  it  were,  without  any  figure  upon  it, 
like  unto  these  compartments  which  I  have  called  terraces  with  us.  And  the 
other  achievements  he  gives  us  figures  of  in  his  said  book  have  no  compartments 
at  all,  because  they  have  no  supporters  to  stand  upon  the  same  ;  which,  in  my 
opinion,  is  the  only  fit  method  I  can  think  on  for  the  usage  of  compartments  in 
armories,  and  in  the  best  foreign  herald  books  that  I  have  perused:  when  the 
figures  of  armorial  achievements  therein  are  cut  with  supporters,  they  are  generally 
placed  standing  on  a  terrace,  and  when  they  have  no  supporters,  I  observe  they 
have  no  compartm.ents  at  all. 

Which  naturally  leads  me  to  suggest,  that  another  probable  reason  anent  the 
original  of  the  usage  of  terrace  compartments  in  armories,  hath  presumably  taken 
its  rise  from  which  tournaments  and  joustings,  to  which  none  were  admitted  but  those 

Vol.  n.  3  Q^ 


t36 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


who  were  truly  noble,  or  gentle  by  father's  and  mother's  side,  and  who  were  obliged 
to  expose  their  armorial  bearings,  as  proofs  of  their  noble  and  gentle  extraction, 
which  they  at  first  adorned  with  helmet,  crest,  motto,  mantling,  and  wreath,  be- 
fore the  exercise  began ;  so  afterwards,  according  to  Menestrier  and  other  French 
writers,  began  from  thence  the  rise  and  progressive  use  of  supporters.  The  knights 
nobles,  qualified  for  such  exercises,  had  tlieir  arms  hung  up  on  the  barrier-trees, 
commonly  in  the  open  fields,  near  to  the  place  of  jousting,  which  were  attended 
by  their  armour-bearer  and  esquires,  to  the  end  they  might  acquaint  their  masters 
what  knight  gave  them  a  challenge  to  fight,  which  was  done  by  touching  the 
shield.  And  the  said  Menestrier  further  tells  us,  that  these  knights  put  their  ar- 
mour-bearers, pages,  and  servants,  in  such  dresses  as  they  fancied,  making  them 
sometimes  appear  like  Savages,  Saracens,  Moors,  &-c.  and  sometimes  under  disguise, 
clothed  with  the  skins  of  lions,  bears,  &c.  to  guard  their  shields  of  arms,  and  to 
give  an  account  of  the  names  and  arms  of  those  who  give  the  challenge  by  touch- 
ing the  shields  of  their  masters.  And  the  fields  whereon  these  servants  stood  for 
guarding  of  their  masters'  arms,  thus  hung  up,  might  induce  limners  and  painters, 
that  had  occasion  to  see  the  same,  to  form  from  the  life  such  figures  and  represen- 
tations thereof,  with  a  view  of  the  adjacent  ground  and  field  whereon  these  sup- 
porters stood,  and  arms  hung,  so  as  to  introduce  the  practice  of  trimming,  support- 
ed shields  of  arms  with  terrrace  compartments.  And  John  Slezer,  in  his  Theatrmn 
Scotia,  hath  caused  cut  several  of  our  nobilitys'  arms  that  he  hath  made  dedica- 
tions to  therein,  trimmed  with  rising  terrace  compartments,  for  their  supporters  to 
stand  upon;  yet  the  book,  Jetc  (T armories  des  soverains  ci?  estats  cT Europe,  in  which 
are  the  prints  and  figures  of  all  the  achievements  of  the  princes  of  Europe,  hath 
none  of  them  upon  compartments,  but  two  or  three,  and  these  upon  very  ordinary 
ones;  so  that,  as  I  have  said  before,  compartments  depend  much  upon  the  fancy 
of  the  workman,  as  to  their  form  and  figure,  for  supporters  to  stand  and  rest  upon, 
as  will  evidently  appear  from  the  great  variety  of  compartments  in  the  sculptures 
to  be  met  with  in  the  several  treatises  of  heraldry,  both  at  home  and  abroad. 

I  have  added  this  chapter  of  compartments,  which  some  may  think  might  have 
been  omitted,  in  respect  no  herald  before  me  hath  taken  notice  of  them  as  any 
part  of  this  science ;  yet  from  what  I  have  narrated  and  seen  thereanent  from  seals 
and  old  paintings,  the  usage  of  compartments  I  have  made  appear  to  be  an  ancient 
practice,  especially  with  us  and  the  French,  which  frees  me  from  an  objection  of 
having  omitted  to  speak  and  treat  on  some  part  and  figure  now  in  use  for  adorning 
of  armorial  achievements,  which  I  think  I  have  now  almost  completed.  And  shall 
next  proceed  to  put  the  whole  armorial  trimmings,  that  make  up  a  complete  coat 
of  arms,  particularly  of  the  highest  ranks  of  nobility,  under  a  manteaux  and  canopy, 
and  the  arms  of  the  inferior  ranks  under  cloaks  or  mantles;  and  then  come  to  a 
close  of  the  exterior  ornaments  now  and  of  old  made  use  of  in  adorning  and  beau- 
tifying the  armorial  shield. 


CHAP.     XIII. 

OF  MANTEAUXES  AND  PAVILIONS. 

HAVING  now  fully  already  treated  of  all  the  sorts  of  figures  and  symbols 
made  use  of  exteriorly  in  armories,  to  accomplish  and  complete  the  ar- 
morial achievements  of  those  of  the  inferior  and  high  ranks  of  nobility,  I  shall  here 
leave  those  of  the  first  degree,  under  cloaks  and  mantles,  and  these  of  the  last  de- 
gree, under  manteauxes  and  pavilions,  wliich  being  the  utmost  embellishments  of 
armories  I  now  treat  on,  I  shall  conclude  this  my  System  on  the  Exterior  Orna- 
ments in  the  Science  of  Heraldry  therewith. 

The  rise  and  original  of  the  usage  of  manteauxes  and  pavilions  in  armories,  as 
the  other  exterior  ornaments  of  the  shield,  are  supposed  by  the  most  judicious 
heralds  to  have  their  beginning  from  the  ceremonials  of  tournaments  and  jou^tings. 
Where  it  is  to  be  observed,  that  it  was  customary  for  the  arms  of  the  combatants 
to  be  exposed  to  the  public  view  of  all  beholders  for  some  time  before  the  said  ex- 
ercise began,  and  as  the  conveniency  of  the  place  allowed,  they  were  exposed  and 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


137 


set  forth  upon  military  cioaks,  carpets,  mantles,  tents,  and  pavilions.  Whicli,  Me- 
nestrier  says,  in  old  manuscripts  of  such  exercises,  were  called  ensigns,  blazons,  and 
covers  of  arms.  And  from  a  manuscript  which  he  had  from  Monsieur  d'Cange, 
they  were  also  called  by  these  names.  And  he  further  adds,  that  the  heralds  did 
cry  and  advertise  the  knights  to  set  out  their  banners,  blazons,  and  houses  iVecti, 
or  ensigns  of  arms,  that  the  tournaments  might  be  orderly.  And,  as  1  observed 
before,  (when  treating  on  supporters)  of  the  piece  of  a  formula  of  a  challenge  to  u 
tournament,  (out  of  Segar)  given  by  the  French  to  the  English,  it  is  there  insert, 
that  their  shields  of  arms  were  to  be  hung  up  some  days  before  the  accomplish- 
ment of  the  said  exercise  upon  their  pavilions. 

It  is  probable  then,  that  in  the  places  and  nations  where  arms  were  most  in  re- 
quest, that  there  the  embellishments  of  them  had  their  rise,  and  came  to  be  placed 
on  the  most  glorious  ornaments,  both  of  men  and  women,  the  same  being  ensigns, 
not  only  of  acquired,  but  also  of  hereditary  honour,  as  is  evident  by  the  practice 
of  all  civilized  nations,  in  representing  the  greatest  persons,  men  or  women,  dead 
or  alive  in  their  most  noble  habits  with  their  arms.  As  for  instance,  the  ingeni- 
ous Mr  Sandford,  in  his  Genealogical  History  of  the  Kings  of  England,  gives  us 
the  effigies  of  Eleanor,  wife  to  Edward  Duke  of  Somerset,  who  was  slain  in  the 
battle  of  St  Alban's,  in  the  year  1455,  as  represented  in  the  window  of  the  Col- 
legiate Church  of  Warwick  on  painted  glass,  with  her  mantle  embroidered  with 
the  arms  of  her  husband  the  duke,  and  on  her  kirtle,  or  under-habit,  these  of  her 
own  family,  from  which  he  makes  an  observe,  from  a  general  practice,  that  where- 
ever  a  woman  is  carved,  cut  out,  or  painted  with  a  mantle  or  kirtle  of  arms,  that 
these  on  the  mantle  are  the  arms  of  the  husband,  and  these  on  the  kirtle  are  the 
wife's  paternal  ones,  and  backs  or  supports  it  with  this  reason,  that  the  husband's 
arms  on  the  upper  garment  are  as  a  cloak  and  mantle  to  shroud  the  wife  from 
all  violence,  and  these  of  her  own,  on  her  kirtle,  or  under  garment,  as  being  under 
covert. 

The  said  author  likewise  gives  us  another  instance,  which  seems  to  contradict 
his  former  observe,  yet  more  agreeable  to  the  present.forms  of  manteauxes  with 
armorial  arms  on  the  foldings,  and  which  is  an  ancient  example  of  this  practice, 
viz.  in  the  322d  page  of  his  said  History,  he  gives  us  a  figure  of  Anne  Neville,  the 
wife  of  Humphrey  Earl  of  Stafford,  which  he  has  there  caused  cut  as  it  stood  painted 
on  the  window  of  the  Cathedral  Church  of  Litchfield,  having  on  her  upper  gar- 
ment, or  mantle,  the  arms  of  her  paternal  family,  being  that  of  Neville,  and  no 
arms  on  her  kirtle;  but  the  arms  of  her  husband  Humphrey  Earl  of  Stafford  i^ 
placed  on  the  lining  of  her  mantle,  which,  being  turned  back,  represents  (says  he) 
an  exact  impalement  of  the  arms  of  Staff ^rd  and  Neville. 

He  gives  us  another  instance  on  the  tomb  which  Charles  Somerset  Earl  of  Wor- 
cester  caused  erect  for  himself,  (who  lived  in  the  reign  of  King  Henry  VIII.  or 
England)  and  his  first  wife  Elizabeth  Herbert,  daughter  and  heir  of  William  Her- 
bert Earl  of  Huntingdon,  and  Lord  Herbert  of  Gower,  in  the  Royal  Chapel  of 
Windsor,  where  his  portraiture  is  represented  apparelled  in  the  habit  of  a  Knight  of 
the  Order  of  St  George,  and  his  wife's  in  that  of  a  countess,  having  her  kirtle  em- 
broidered with  her  paternal  arms,  and  on  the  mantle  the  arms  of  her  husband. 
In  several  of  our  old  illuminate  books  of  arms  here  in  Scotland  I  have  seen  figures 
of  the  portraitures  of  several  of  our  kmgs  and  queens,  and  some  of  the  ladies  ot 
our  higher  nobility,  before  the  reign  of  Q^ieen  Mary,  depicted  thereon,  the  men 
having  their  armorial  bearings  placed  in  a  shield  over  their  head,  and  the  women 
having  on  their  kirtles  the  arms  of  their  husbands  impaled  with  their  own,  by 
which  it  would  appear  that  we  had  the  like  practice  of  old  here  in  Scotland,  as 
well  as  in  England  ;  and  presumably,  through  the  ignorance  of  our  then  herald- 
painters  in  drawing  these  efSgies  in  their  books,  without  upper  garments  or  mantles, 
where  their  husband's  paternal  arms  ought  to  have  been  placed,  they  have  im- 
paled them  together  on  their  kirtles  to  make  up  this  escape. 

Monsieur  Hosier,  in  his  Genealogy  of  the  Signieurs  of  Labour,  speaking  of  Lewis 
de  Combauld,  who  had  followed  the  Constable  of  Bourbon  in  his  wars,  and  being 
close  at  his  side  when  he  was  killed  in  the  scaling  of  Rome,  in  the  year  1527, 
covered  the  bcJy  of  that  prince  with  his  coat  of  armour,  which  he  threw  ofl  to 
hide  the  body  of  the  prince  from   the  soldiers,  lest  the  prince's  death  should  dis- 


J  38  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

courage  them  from  the  attack,  which  afterwards  they  accomplished  xvith  victory, 
by  the  prudence  of  the  said  Lewis,  who,  to  perpetuate  his  presence  of  mind  in  that 
iuncture,  and  his  brave  conduct,  had  atter  this  his  shield  of  arms  enveloped  with 
his  surcoat,  and,  for  motto,  above  it,  these  words,  Ubi  riu-l  ibifcl.  And  Menestner 
doth  also  narrate  the  same  passage. 

Let  these  instances  1  have  given  be  sufficient  for  the  ancient  practice  of  placing 
shields  of  arms  on  cloaks,  mantles,  or  manteauxes,  and  surcoats.  I  next  proceed 
to  consider  these  with  their  form  used  in  latter  times,  as  practised  and  represented 
by  our  modern  heralds  in  their  books  of  blazons,  of  which  I  met  with  three  rash- 
ions  of  manteauxes  or  mantles,  as  they  are  pleased  to  call  them  ;  the  first  are  these 
that  are  trussed  up  on  both  sides  square  like  a  curtain,  such  as  these  figures  Richard 
Blome  hath  given  us  in  his  Anulogia  Honorum  subjoined  to  Mr  Guillmi's  firth  edi- 
tion of  his  Display  of  Heraldry,  viz.  in  the  arms  of  Edward  Viscount  of  Conway, 
and  in  several  of  the  achievements  of  the  barons  of  England,  which  is  placed  above 
their  supporters  in  place  of  the  ordinary  practice  ot  running  leaves ;  and  in  arms 
without  supporters,  gives  us  figures  of  such  mantles  that  surround  the  whole  shield 
and  helmet,  except  the  crest  and  wreath,  which  stand  without  the  same,  several  ex- 
amples whereof  he  gives  us,  to  wit,  in  the  arms  of  Sir  Wolstan  Dixie  of  Bosworth,  Sir 
Philip  Matthews  of  Edmonton,  Sir  John  Osborne  of  Chicksands,  and  divers  others, 
both  knights  and  esquires. 

The  second  fashion  or  form  of  mantles  are  figured,  hanging  down  around  the 
.shield  and  helmet  in  many  plaits  and  foldings,  like  to  a  cloak  or  gown,  when 
hanging  about  one's  shoulders,  which  Sylvester  Petra  Sancta  calls  chlamys,  wnbella, 
or  palliolum.  Several  examples  hereof  the  said  Mr  Blome  hath  given  us  in  his  said 
Treatise  of  Honour  and  Nobility,  particularly  in  his  cuts  of  the  arms  of  Sir  Ed- 
mond  Bacon  of  Redgi-ave,  Sir  John  Wittewronge  of  Rothamsted,  Sir  Robert  Jason 
of  Broad-Somerford,  Sir  John  Shaw  of  Eltham,  Sir  Stephen  White  of  Hackney, 
Francis  Dives  of  Brumham,  Anthony  Rowe  of  St  Martin's,  and  a  great  many 
more,  both  knights  and  esquires.  And  our  learned  countryman  Sir  George  Mack- 
enzie, in  his  Science  of  Heraldry,  page  88.  hath  given  us  a  figure  of  such  a  like 
mantle  surrounding  the  arms  of  the  surname  of  Denhara  of  old,  which  he  calls  an 
antique  mantling. 

Now,  as  these  two  fashions  of  mantles  are  chiefly  given  by  the  British  heralds  to 
those  of  the  inferior  rank  of  nobility,  though  the  said  Mr  Blome  hath  also  more 
irregularly  trimmed  several  of  the  noble  peers  of  England  with  such  mantles  about 
their  helmets,  (as  may  be  seen  by  the  many  figures  he  hath  given  us  cut  in  copper 
in  his  forecited  book)  so  it  will  appear,  that  the  French  practice  seems  to  be  the 
same  ;  for  Menestrier  tells  us,  that  these  mantles  serve  as  an  ornament  to  such  fa- 
milies, who  have  no  title  of  dignity,  and  that  their  first  rise  was  from  tournaments, 
and  were  anciently  used  by  persons  of  quality,  especially  ladies,  (as  I  observed  be- 
fore) who,  as  is  yet  to  be  seen  on  several  ancient  tombs  or  funeral  monuments, 
are  represented  in  cloaks  or  mantles,  with  their  husbands'  arms  upon  them,  and 
on  their  under-garments  or  kirtles,  with  these  of  their  own  families  ;  which  prac- 
tice is  frequent  in  the  German  armorial  bearings,  and  in  those  of  Naples,  as  saith 
Menestrier. 

The  tinctures  of  these  cloaks  or  mantles  are  with  foreigners  the  same  with  the 
tinctures  of  their  arms;  but  with  us  in  Britain  they  are  red,  doubled  with  white. 
Sylvester  Petra  Sancta,  in  the  8oth  chapter  of  his  book  de  Pallio  et  Tentorio  in 
umbrante  gentilitias  tesseras,  gives  us  two  cloaks,  (such  as  that  I  last  narrated  from 
the  cuts  in  Mr  Blome's  Treatise)  one  of  them  with  a  ducal  escutcheon  placed  upon 
it,  which  he  calls  Chlamydem  sm  umbellam,  qua  circumvolvitur  icon  gentilitia  duntax- 
at  ducum  et  principum.  And  this  mantle  is  doubled  with  ermine,  and  is  fit  for  those 
(says  he)  of  the  high  degree  of  nobility.  The  other  mantle  he  gives  us  is  with- 
out ermine,  and  tells  us  the  same  is  fit  for  commanders  and  captains  of  soldiers  to 
use. 

The  third  and  most  honourable  sort  of  manteauxes,  now  used  both  in  France  and 

Britain,  are  more  round  in  their  figure  than  the  former  I  have  mentioned,  and  are 

doubled  with  ermine,  which  envelope  or  go  round  the  escutcheon :  and  upon  the 

foldings  or  skirts  of  these  mantles  are  frequently  embroidered  the  arms  of  the  own- 

2 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTi,.  139 

ers,  that  when  they  are  brought  over  the  escutcheon  and  meet,  the  embroidereil 
arms  are  entire  as  on  the  escutcheon  within. 

Menestrier  says,  that  the  first  use  of  this  mantle,  or  manteaux,  is  not  above  150 
years  since ;  and  the  first  of  them  he  met  with  was  that  one  which  surrounds  the 
arms  of  the  Duke  of  Lorrain  in  the  AUemagne  armorial,  and  he  calls  such  ones  ducal 
7ncin!eauxL-s,  because  none  but  princes,  dukes,  and  peers  of  France  used  them,  as 
also  cardinal  princes  and  cardinal  dukes;  and  tells  us,  that  Cardinal  George  Duke 
de  Armagnac,  Legate  of  Avignon,  had  his  arms  placed  on  such  a  manteaux  in 
the  year  1583.  And  Cardinal  Richelieu  and  Cardinal  Mazarine  had  their  arms  so 
adorned. 

The  use  of  these  manteauxes  or  mantles  is  but  late  in  England  ;  and  the  firss 
figures  of  them  I  have  met  with  in  the  herald  books  of  that  kingdom,  are  to  be 
found  in  the  said  Mr  Blome's  ^inalogia  Hoimriim,  subjoined  to  Mr  Guillim's  fifth 
edition  of  his  Display  of  Heraldry,  folio,  London  1679,  an  example  whereof  he 
therein  gives  us,  done  on  copperplate,  surrounding  the  armorial  achievements  of 
Henry  Pierrepont  Marquis  of  Dorchester.  And  in  other  English  herald  books  1 
have  seen  figures  of  the  achievements  of  Henry  Somerset  Marquis  of  "Worcester, 
Heneage  Fuich  Earl  of  Winchelsea,  and  John  Lord  Bellasyse  Baron  of  Worlaby 
trimmed  with  the  like  mantles.  But  the  first  practice  of  these  mantles  I  met  with 
in  Scotland,  was  that  of  the  armorial  bearing  of  Charles  Earl  of  Lauderdale,  which 
was  trimmed  so  at  London,  and  cut  on  a  copperplate,  in  imitation  of  these  I  have 
before  mentioned,  which  in  figure  are  all  done  in  the  like  method  and  form  as  1 
caused  cut  on  copper  the  achievements  of  James  Duke  of  Hamilton,  which  is 
placed  before  my  dedication  to  him  of  my  First  Volume  of  this  System  of  Heraldry. 
But  though  the  English,  by  the  above  examples,  allow  this  mantle  to  be  assumed, 
and  carried  by  all  degrees  of  their  high  nobility,  yet  this  custom  being  not  so  prac- 
tised by  other  nations,  in  my  opinion  none  but  dukes,  marquisses  and  earls  ought 
to  have  their  arms  trimmed  with  such  mantles,  and  none  under  these  degrees  of 
nobility  ought  to  assume  the  same,  till  at  least  the  practice  hereof  be  more  uni- 
versally used  abroad.  For  this  mantle  is  ordinarily  named  a  comital  mantle,  and 
therefore  it  is  irregular  for  lower  nobility,  that  have  not  advanced  to  the  degree  of 
Earl,  to  trim  their  achievements  with  comital  mantles.  As  also  it  is  to  be  obser- 
ved, that  anciently  the  coronets  of  earls  were  after  the  same  shape  and  form  with 
those  of  the  degree  of  dukes,  as  was  also  their  other  ensigns  of  honour;  and  besides, 
this  form  of  mantle  is  particularly  allowed  by  a  general  practice  to  all  of  the  degree 
of  earl. 

The  first  appearance  of  this  manteaux,  or  mantle,  on  funeral  escutcheons  with  vfi 
in  North  Britain,  was  on  that  of  the  Right  Honourable  John  Dalziel  Earl  of  Carn- 
wath,  who  died  at  Edinburgh,  and  was  interred  at  the  Abbey  of  Holyroodhouse. 
in  the  year  1702,  a  nobleman  of  good  learning,  and  well  known  in  this  science  of 
heraldry.  And  the  next  I  observed  was  on  the  funeral  escutcheon  of  the  last 
George  Earl  of  Winton  Lord  Seaton,  the  blazon  whereof  I  subjoin  as  follows. 

Quarterly  first  and  fourth  or,  three  crescents  within  a  double  tressure,  flowered 
and  counter-flowered  with  flower-de-luces  ^«/(fj-,  for  the  surname  or  Seaton  ;  second 
and  third  azure,  three  garbs  or,  for  the  earldom  of  Buchan,  over  all  an  escutcheon 
parted  per  pale,  first  gules,  a  sword  in  pale  proper,  hiked  and  pommelled  or,  sup- 
porting an  imperial  crown  within  a  double  tressure  flowered  and  counter-flowered 
with  flower-de-luces  of  the  last  as  a  coat  of  concession,  second,  azure  a.  blazing  star 
argent,  within  a  double  tressure,  flowered  and  counter-flowered  with  flower-de-luces 
or,  as  a  coat  of  augmentation  assumed  by  Robert,  first  Earl  of  Winton  :  which  es- 
cutcheon is  timbred  with  crown,  helmet,  and  volets  befitting  his  quality  ;  and  on 
the  helmet,  in  place  of  a  wreath,  is  set  a  ducal  coronet,  and  thereupon,  for  crest,  is 
placed  a  dragon  vert,  spouting  out  fire  before  and  behind,  proper,  charged  on  the 
wing  thereof  with  a  blazing  star  argent,  and  on  the  fire,  out  of  the  mouth  of  the 
dragon,  are  the  words  Sett-on,  and  above,  on  an  escrol,  for  motto,  these  words, 
Hazard  zit  forivard :  supporters  two  martins  proper  collared,  or,  and  charged  with 
crescents  gules,  and  to  the  collar  are  chains  affixed  passing  between  their  fore  legs, 
and  reflexing  over  their  backs,  and  on  an  escrol  (coming  from  behind  the  sides 
of  the  shield,  and  over  the  middle  of  the  supporters)  this  epigraph.  In  via  virtuti 
vitia  nulla,  and  below,  on  the  compartment,  is  inscribed  this  motto,  Irtaminatisful- 

VoL.n.  3R 


140  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

get  honoribus.  Behind  the  shield  are  placed  two  battons  saltier-ways  ^tt/i?j-,  seme  of 
thistles,  ensigned  with  imperial  crowns  or,  and  topped  witli  the  same  crown,  as 
the  particular  badge  of  the  king's  master-household  ;  all  which  are  placed  upon  a 
comital  manteaux  gules,  doubled  ermine,  fringed  or,  and  upon  the  upper  laps  of 
the  manteaux  the  foresaid  arms.  At  the  four  corners  of  the  achievement  are  placed 
as  many  devices  of  the  family  in  roundels,  the  uppermost  on  the  right  side,  being 
or,  a  crescent,  increscent,  and  decrescent  interlaced  gules,  and  out  of  the  crescent 
issueth  a  sword,  proper,  hiked  and  pommelled  or,  supporting  an  imperial  crown 
proper,  and  on  the  circle  going  round  this  device  these  words.  In  adversity  pa- 
tience, in  prosperity  benevolence.  The  second  upper  device  on  the  left  is  almost  the 
same  with  the  former,  only  hath  a  garb  in  place  of  the  sword  ensigned  also  with 
an  imperial  crown,  and  the  third  as  the  second,  and  the  fourth  as  the  first,  and 
round  the  foresaid  achievement  and  devices  were  placed  siKteen  escutcheons  of 
noble  families,  with  their  respective  coronets,  as  the  proofs  of  the  said  Earl's  nobi- 
lity paternal  and  maternal. 

But  to  return,  Menestrier  tells  us,  that  the  presidents  of  the  several  parliaments 
in  France,  in  imitation  of  the  peers  of  that  kingdom,  are  in  use  to  place  their 
arms  also  on  their  mantles,  which  they  wear  with  their  other  robes  in  parliaments, 
and  all  solemnities,  being  scarlet  doubled  with  a  grey  fur.  But  then  it  is  to  be 
observed,  that  the  skirts  or  foldings  of  these  mantles  of  theirs  are  not  embroidered 
with  their  particular  arms,  in  like  manner  as  these  of  the  dukes  and  peers  in  France, 
and  with  us,  are  now  accustomed  to  trim  their  achievements,  yet  they  have  placed 
down  on  the  left  side  of  their  mantles  a  gold  galloon  as  a  mark  of  knighthood, 
which  is  always  affixed  to  the  office. 

I  shall  next  proceed  to  speak  anent  the  pavilion  or  canopy,  and  then  have  done. 
Pavilion  is  in  the  nature  of  a  tent  or  tabernacle,  being  three  different  names  for 
the  same  thing,  as  derived  from  several  languages ;  they  were  the  chief  habitations 
of  the  ancient  patriarchs  in  the  first  ages  of  the  word,  as  may  be  seen  in  Gen. 
xii.  8.  And  such  is  the  manner  of  the  Tartars  at  this  day  ;  some  of  them  have  no 
towns  or  villages  to  inhabit,  but  the  open  and  champaign  fields,  after  the  manner  of 
the  Scythians.  And  JVIr  Guillim  tells  us,  that  since  tents  have  been  laid  aside  for 
habitation,  they  have  been  rtiade  use  of  for  armies  during  the  campaign,  and  came 
afterwards  to  be  used  in  heraldry.  And  the  family  of  Tenton  in  England  bears 
sable  a  cheveron  between  three  tents  argent.  But  the  word  pavilion  is  borrowed 
from  the  French,  and  pavilions,  as  we  generally  represent  them,  are  round  at  the 
top,  and  sometimes  borne  in  coat-armour,  as  may  be  seen  in  the  bearing  of  the 
Co.npany  of  Merchant-Taylors  of  London,  whose  arms  are  argent,  a  tent-royal  be- 
tween two  parliament-robes  gules,  lined  ermine,  on  a  chief  azure,  a  lion  passant 
gardant,  or.  Yet  the  noblest  instance  of  a  paviHon  is,  that  sometimes  the  achieve- 
ment stands  within  a  royal  pavilion,  as  that  of  the  Emperor  and  King  of  France  ; 
this  Sylvester  Petra  Sancta  calls  tentorium,  and  is,  as  he  observes,  competent  only 
to  princes,  though  all  princes  use  them  not.  But  I  admire  why  the  Kings  of 
England  did  not  assume  as  well  the  pavilion  as  the  arms  of  France,  seeing  that  is 
one  of  the  special  honours  of  that  kingdom.  And  Monsieur  Baron,  in  his  Art  of 
Heraldry,  calls  this  royal  pavilion  Augustale  Tabernaculum  Regium  scuti  Tentorium. 
The  figure  of  this  pavilion  or  canopy  has  two  principal  parts,  the  combel  and  cur- 
tains ;  the  first  is  the  hat  or  cover,  with  rays  going  along  the  top,  and  at  the  bot- 
tom thereof  tassels  hanging  down ;  the  second  are  the  tapestry  of  curtains,  which 
are  lined  with  ermine,  and  these  hang  down  from  the  combel,  and  which  last,  be- 
ing the  curtains  without  the  combel,  may  be  allowed  to  environ  or  envelope  the 
achievements  of  elective  and  feuditary  kings  and  princes,  according  to  the  opinion 
of  some  heralds;  and  none  but  sovereign  princes  can  place  their  achievements  un- 
der a  pavilion,  covered  with  a  combel.  That  of  the  King  of  France  is  ordinarily 
given  us  under  a  royal  pavilion,  whose  blazon  thereof,  according  to  Monsieur 
Baron  in  his  r Art  Heraldique,  page  120,  I  shall  here  subjoin  as  follows  in  his  own' 
words : 

"  D'azur  a  trois  fleurs-de-hs  d'or  deux,  en  chef  &.  unen  pointe;  I'ecu  timbre  d'un 
"  casque  d'or,  ouvert,  place  de  front,  assorte  de  ses  lambrequins  des  emaux,  son 
"  blason,  &.  surmonte'  de  la  couronne  imperiale  Francoise  ;  environne  des  colliers 
"  des  Ordres  du  Saint  Esprit  et  de  Saint  Michel ;  tenli  par   deux  anges  vetus  en 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


141 


"  Lfevites,  tenans  cliaciin  une  bannier  &-  ayant  leiirs  dalmatiqucs,  cliarge's  du 
"  mesme  blason  ;  le  tout  place  sous  un  grand  pavilion  seme  de  France  &■  double 
"  d'hermine?,  son  comble  rayonne  d'or  &  somme  de  la  couronne  imperiale  Fran^oisc, 
"  garni  d'un  lleur-de-lis  a  quatre  angles,  qui  est  le  cimier  de  France.  Le  cri  dc 
"  guerre  est  Montjoyc  S.  Dennis  :  ce  saint  extant  le  patron  &-  I'apostie  de  la, 
"  F" ranee;  le  susdit  pavilion  attache  a  roritlame  du  royaume,  qui  est  surnionte  de 
"  la  devise  ;  lilia  mn  laborant  neqiii;  nent,  laquelle  est  tiree  de  I'cloge  que  le  Fils  de 
"  Dieu  donne  aux  lis  dans  I'Ecriture,  lui  faisant  faire  allusion  ;i  la  loi  Salique,  qui 
"  exclude  le  lilies  de  la  Royaute." 

riie  blazon  in  English  thus ;  azure,  three  flower-de-luces  or,  1  and  i  ;  the 
shield  is  tinibred  with  a  golden  helmet,  standing  direct  forward,  and  open  in  the 
face,  adorned  with  lambiequins  of  the  tinctures  of  the  arms,  and  ensigned  with 
the  imperial  crown  of  France  ;  the  shield  is  environed  with  the  collars  of  ihc 
Orders  of  the  Holy  Ghost  and  St  Michael;  supporters  two  angels,  proper,  in  daU 
matic  habits,  charged  with  the  same  figures,  each  holding  a  banner,  ail  under  a 
pavilion  seme  of  France,  doubled  ermine  ;  the  combel  bemg  of  rays  of  gold,  is  en- 
signed  with  the  imperial  crown  of  France,  and  it  again  topped  with  four  flower-de- 
luces,  the  crest  of  that  nation  ;  on  an  escrol  the  cry  of  war,  Montjoie  St  Dennis ; 
behind  the  pavilion  is  placed  the  royal  banner  or  oriflame  of  France,  and  over  all, 
on  an  escrol,  the  device  ot  France,  Lilia  nan  laborant  ncque  nent ;  which  is  drawn 
from  the  words  of  the  Son  of  God,  spoken  in  the  Scripture  of  the  Ulies,  making  an 
allusion  to  the  Salique  law,  which  excludes  women  from  succeeding  to  the  sove- 
reignty of  France.  The  foresaid  Monsieur  Baron  and  others  place  the  royal  arms 
of  France  on  a  compartment,  which  they  mention  not  in  their  blazons  as  we  do  ; 
they  make  it  represent  a  pavement  cheque,  of  four  tracts,  argent  and  azure  on  the 
first,  the  letter  L  ensigned  with  an  imperial  crown,  and  on  the  second  a  flower-de- 
luce  or. 

As  for  the  antiquity  of  the  pavilion  of  France,  Menestrier  tells  us,  That  Philip 
de  Valois  had  it  on  his  seals  and  coins  of  gold,  for  which  they  were  called  pavi- 
lions ;  and  that  Philip  Moreau  was  the  first  contriver  of  the  royal  pavilion ; 
he  likewise  tells  us.  That  he  has  seen  the  arms  of  Cardinal  Charles  of  Bourbon, 
which  were  supported  with  lions,  and  a  crosier  of  an  archbishop  behind  the 
shield  (which  was  not  crowned)  under  a  pavilion  seme  of  the  cyphers  of  his  name, 
surmounted  of  a  cardinal's  hat,  and  the  curtains  of  the  pavilion  are  drawn  by,  to 
let  the  arms  be  seen,  by  two  arms,  with  manuples  over  them,  holding  flaming 
swords. 

The  kings  of  Denmark,  Portugal,  and  the  Duke  of  Savoy,  as  King  of  Cyprus, 
have  had  their  achievements  under  pavilions.  It  is  thought  strange  that  the  kings 
of  England  did  not  assume  the  pavilion  of  France  as  well  as  their  arms,  nor  used 
another  of  their  own.  Our  sovereigns,  equal  in  dignity  with  the  greatest  in 
Europe,  have  never  been  in  use  to  place  their  arms  under  a  pavilion,  so  far  as  1 
can  learn,  who,  for  their  antiquity  and  long  succession  of  112  kings,  and  for  their 
ancient  use  of  their  fixed  armorial  ensigns,  may  justly  claim  precedency  of  all 
the  crowned  heads  in  Europe  and  their  armorial  bearings,  which  have  been  altered 
and  changed  by  others  conquering  them,  and  succession  of  strangers,  to  which 
abitements  and  mutations  our  sovereign  ensigns  were  never  subject,  but  always 
hereditary  and  entire,  ;  which  from  age  to  age  have  been  adorned  with  all  the 
marks  of  greatness  then  in  use  and  since,  do  justly  merit  all  the  embellishments 
of  honour  that  can  be  invented  to  adorn  arms ;  therefore,  if  placed  under  a  pavi- 
lion, may  be  blazoned  thus. 

The  royal  achievement  or  sovereign  ensign  armorial  of  the  kingdom  of  Scot- 
land, or,  a  lion  rampant  j^u/fj-,  armed  and  langued  azure,  within  a  double  tressure, 
counter-flowered  with  flower-de-luces  of  the  second,  timbred  with  a  helmet  stand- 
ing direct  forward  with  bars  or,  adorned  with  lambrequins  or,  doubled  ermine, 
and  ensigned  with  the  imperial  crown  of  Scotland,  and  thereon,  for  crest,  a  lion 
seiant,  full-faced  gules,  crowned  or,  holding  in  his  right  paw  a  naked  sword,  proper, 
and  in  the  sinister  a  sceptre  or,  both  erected,  and  above,  on  an  escrol,  for  motto. 
In  defence.  The  shield  is  encircled  with  the  colour  of  the  Most  Ancient  and  Most 
Noble  Order  of  the  Thistle,  with  the  badge  thereto  appended,  of  gold  enamelled 
azure,  having  the  image  of  St  Andrew  surmounted  of  his  cro^s  argent,  and  sup  - 


142 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


ported  by  two  unicorns  argent,  crowned  with  imperial  and  gorged  with  open 
crowns ;  to  the  last  chains  affixed,  passing  betwixt  their  fore  legs,  and  reflected  over 
their  backs  or  ;  he  on  the  dexter  embracing  and  bearing  up  a  banner  of  cloth  of 
gold,  charged  with  the  royal  arms  of  Scotland ;  he  on  the  sinister  another  banner 
azure,  charged  with  a  St  Andrew's  cross  argent,  standing  on  a  compartment  like 
a  pavement,  cheque  or  and  a%ure  ;  on  the  first,  the  armorial  figures  of  Scotland  ; 
and  on  the  second,  the  cross  of  St  Andrew,  all  within  a  royal  pavilion  of  cloth  of 
gold,  seme  of  thistles  slipped  proper,  doubled  ermine,  the  combel  rayonne,  and 
adorned  with  precious  stones,  and  topped  with  the  imperial  crown  of  Scotland, 
over  all,  on  an  escrol,  the  device  of  Scotland,  'Nemo  me  impune  lacesset. 

Sylvester  Petra  Sancta  has  placed  the  arms  of  the  Archduke  of  Austria  within  a 
pavilion. 

The  Doge  of  Venice  placed  above  his  arms  an  ombel,  like  to  the  gonfannon 
of  the  church  of  Rome,  which  was  granted  to  these  in  that  office  by  Pope  Alex- 
ander III.  when  he  fled  to  Venice  from  the  persecution  of  the  Emperor  Fre- 
derick. 

How  the  several  monarchs  of  Great  Britain,  since  the  union  of  the  two  crowns, 
have  compounded  and  diversified  their  royal  achievements  may  be  seen  cut  on 
copperplate.  Volume  the  First  of  this  Book. 


CHAP.     XIV. 

OF  NOBILITY  WITH  ITS  PROOFS,  REGULARLY  COUNTED  AS  THEY  ARE  PLACED  ON  FUNERAt 
ESCUTCHEONS,  AND  OTHER  MONUMENTS  OF  HONOUR,  WITH  THE  FORMS  AND  CERE- 
MONIES OF  FUNERALS  AMONG  US. 


UNDER  the  name  of  Nobles  are  comprehended  the  Prince,  Dukes,  Marquisses, 
Earls,  Viscounts,  and  Barons.  And  though  our  law  doth  not  call  any  man 
noble  under  the  degree  of  a  Baron,  yet  some  distinguish  between  nobiles  majores, 
which  is  from  the  prince  to  the  baron,  and  nobiles  minores,  which  includes  all 
under  a  baron  to  the  gentleman. 

A  gentleman  of  blood  is  one  descended  of  three  descents  of  nobles,  viz,,  of  name 
and  arms,  both  by  his  father  and  mother  ;  for  gentility  is  not  perfect  in  the  person 
on  whom  it  first  devolved,  but  must  be  continued  and  completed  by  succession. 
Thus,  among  the  Romans,  though  the  father  was  free  born,  and  of  the  equestrian 
cense,  yet  it  was  requisite  that  the  grandfather  should  be  the  same,  otherwise  he 
could  not  obtain  the  ring,  which  is  one  of  the  symbols  of  the  equestrian  order,  as 
Pliny  informs  us.  Gentility  then  begins  in  the  grandfather,  increases  in  the  fa- 
ther, and  is  completed  in  the  son. 

The  proofs  of  nobility  therefore,  of  three  descents,  are  reckoned  the  armorial 
ensigns  or  tesseras  of  gentility,  viz.  the  grandfather  and  grandmother  on  the 
father's  side,  and  the  grandfather  and  grandmother  on  the  mother's  side,  which 
are  counted  thus ;  The  grandson  is  first  set  down,  and  above  him  his  father  and 
mother,  and  above  them  their  fathers  and  mothers,  being  the  grandfathers  and 
grandmothers  of  the  first  mentioned,  who  is  the  gentleman  of  three  descents,  as  in 
the  following  Table. 


The  Gentleman  of 
three  descents. 


Father. 


■  Grandfather. 


Grandmother. 


["  Grandfather. 


Grandmother. 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


H3 


These  four  quarters  are  marshalled  and  disposed  on  the  sides  of  the  grandson's 
escutcheon,  or  other  monu.nents  of  honour,  as  proofs  of  his  nobiUty,  and  are 
called  by  the  Latins,  ^lartena.  Tessera,  vel  arguvienta  mbilitatis ;  but  the  Ger- 
mans and  Dutch  call  tiiem  The  four  Lineages,  on  account  that  the  son  proceeds 
from  them  by  four  lines ;  and  we  on  the  same  account,  though  somewhat  impro- 
perly, call  them  Brani:hes,  for  the  son  is  rather  a  branch  of  the  grandtither's,  than 
they  of  him. 

Proofs  of  nobility  by  four  descents  make  eight  quarters,  which  is  counted  by 
adding  a  father  and  mother  to  every  one  of  the  four  former;  and  the  number  of 
eight  quarters  is  ordinarily  used  by  our  heralds  in  funeral  escutcheons  and  other 
monuments  of  honour,  in  manner  following,  viz. 


The  gentleman  of 
four  descents. 


Grandfather, 


Father's  mother. 


r  Grandfather. 


r  Great-grandfather. 

I  > 

^  Grandtather's  mother. 

r  Great-grandfather. 

4- 
I-  Grandmother's  mother. 

r  Great-grandfather, 

3- 
i.  Grandfather's  mother. 

r  Great-gi'andfather. 


.Mother's  mother. 


I  "^ 


Grandmother's  mother. 


.These  eight  quarters,  or  proofs  of  nobility  are  placed"  round  the  escutcheon  or 
arms  of  the  great-grandson  to  show  his  nobility  by  four  descents ;  the  paternal 
quarters  on  the  right  side,  and  the  maternal  on  the  left,  which  appears  more  plain 
by  the  following  figure. 


Vol.  U. 


3S 


J44 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


The  arms  of  the  Great- 
grandson,  noble  by  four  de- 
scents, on  both  father  and 
mother's  sides. 


These  quarters  ought  to  be  regularly  placed,  as  in  the  foregoing  schemes,  and! 

'lot  ignoble,   or  borrowed   from  other  families, 

which  are  forbidden  by  the  statuM  and  edicts  of  several  countries,  as  contrary  to 


should  be  genuine  and  true,  an(^ot  ignoble,   or  borrowed   from  other  tamihes, 
the  laws  of  heraldry. 


Some  countries,  by  their  laws  and  institutions,  require,  as  proofs  of  complete 
nobility,  sixteen  quarters,  which  are  counted  the  same  way  as  in  the  former  scheme, 
by  adding  a  father  and  mother  to  every  one  of  the  eight  quarters,  which  may  be 
multiplied  to  any  number  ;  some'  of  our  noble  families  counting  their  genealogies 
from  the  father  and  mother's  side  to  tbe  number  of  sixty-four  quarters.  The 
common  practice  of  these  proofs  with  us  may  be  seen  on  funeral  escutcheons, 
which  1  shall  here  describe,  wjth  their  trimmings  and  other  pieces  o£  funeral 
pomp. 

The.  funeral  escutchean  is  in  form.,  of  a  lozenge,  about  six  feet  and  two  inches 
square,  on  black  calicoe  or  silk,  with  a  border  of  black  cloth ;  in  the  middle  of: 
which  is  painted  the  complete  achievements  of  the  defunct,  with  its  exterior  orna- 
ments, and  additional  marks  and  badges  of  honour  finely  illuminated  ;  and  round 
the  sides  are  placed  the  quarter  proofs  in  the  order  before  described,  consisting 
sometimes  of  eight  and  sometimes  of  sixteen  on  both  sides,  to  show  that  the  de- 
funct was  noble  by  five  descents  on  both  sides ;  and  on  the  four  corners  of  the 
border  are  placed  four  mort-heads,  having  in  the  interstices  of  all  these  paintings 
seme  of  tears  ;  a  draught,  or  figure,  of  which  is  exemplified  in  the  funeral  escutcheon 
of  the  most  illustrious  prince,  John,  late  Duke  of  Athol. 

The  quarters  or  symbolical  proofs  of  nobility,  being  coats  of  arms  placed  on 
the  sides  of  the  defunct's  achievements,  are  not  timbred  with  helmet  nor  cre«t, 
though  adorned  with  other  marks  and  dignity,  such  as  coronets,  collars  of  sovereign 


i;^  (in;af>r^yki^'> 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  145 

knighthoods,  or  the  badges  of  high  offices,  which  the  owners  of  these  quarters  did 
enjoy. 

The  escutcheon  above  described  is  commonly  placed  on  the  fore  part  of  the 
house,  or  above  the  gate  where  the  deceased  lies ;  and  another  of  the  same  form  is 
fixed  in  the  chiuch  or  aisle  over  the  place  where  he  is  interred  ;  and  above  that 
escutcheon  is  an  hebnet,  wreath,  and  coronet,  suitable  to  the  quality  of  the  de- 
cea>ed,  covered  with  a  lonse  black  silk  crape. 

A  lady  dying  in  her  iiusband's  lifetime  has  her  arms  impaled  in  a  formal  shield 
with  those  of  her  husband  trimmed  with  exterior  ornaments  belonging  to  his 
quality,  and  may  be  cottised  on  the  left  with  the  supporter  of  her  paternal  fa- 
mily. 

A  widow  lady  has  her  paternal  arms  on  a  lozenge  shield,  impaled  with  those  of 
her  husband's  on  the  right,  surrounded  with  la  cordeliere,  i.  e.  a  belt  or  ward 
interliced  with  knots,  which  the  Latins  call,  C'mgulum  laqueatum  illustrium  matro- 
nnrum ;  and  by  the  custom  of  France  is  allowed  to  none  below  knights'  wives, 
though  our  heralds  give  it  without  distinction  to  all  gentlewomen  who  have  right 
to  arms. 

Which  paternal  arms  may  be  adorned  with  her  father's  supporter  and  coronet, 
or  those  of  her  husband,  and  her  proofs  of  nobility  placed  round  the  escutcheon ; 
and  if  she  has  had  two  husbands,  their  arms  may  be  marshalled  by  way  oi parti  mi- 
coupe  on  the  right,  and  her  own  on  the  left,  after  this  manner. 


An  unmarried  lady  or  gentlewoman  has  her  paternal  arms  likewise  on  a  lozenge 
shield,  surrounded  with  a  laqs  d! amour,  and  cotised  with  the  supporters  of  her 
family,  ensigned  with  a  coronet  suitable  thereto,  if  descended  of  high  quality  ; 
and  if  not,  ensigned  with  a  garland  of  flowers,  having  her  proofs  of  nobility  dis- 
po.^ed  round  her  arms  as  before. 

Some  heralds  have  been  in  use  unwarrantably  to  place  the  arms  of  a  gentlewoman 
under  a  canopy,  with  curtains  and  a  combel,  vvh'ch  is  only  due  to  princesses  and 
illustrious  ladies.  So  much  shall  serve  for  the  funeral  escutcheon,  with  the  arms 
and  quarter  proofs  of  nobility. 

There  are  other  things,  besides  the  lozenge  structure  or  escutcheon  above  men- 
tioned, upon  which  the  arms  or  quarters  of  the  deceased  used  to  be  placed  ;  such 
as  the  coffin,  the  canopy  or  pall  of  velvet,  coaches,  horses,  and  trumpet-banners, 
(which  are  all  that  are  now  in  use  with  us)  as  also  other  utensils  used  at  fu- 
neral solemnities,  as  guideons,  standards,  pennons,  banners,  bannerols,   with  other 


140 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


badges  of  lionour,  viz.  the  coronet,  helmet,  crest,  sword,  surcoat  of  arms,  gauntlet, 
spurs,  and  otner  pieces  of  armour,  which,  after  the  mterment,  used  to  be  hung  up. 
on  walls  or  pillais  near  the  grave,  as  may  be  seen  in  most  of  our  churches.  And 
in  other  kingdoms  they  have  a  repository  or  case  for  containmg  the  cassock  or 
surcoat  of  arms,  above  \vhich  is  placed  the  helmet  and  coronet,  supported  by  the 
sword  on  the  side  thereof,  and  below  are  the  gauntlet  or  spurs.  Which  repository 
is  adorned  with  the  paternal  and  maternal  ensigns  of  the  defunct's  quarters,  called 
by  the  French  cabinet  d'honneur,  or  cabinet  cC.rmes,  and  by  the  Latins  armurium 
iiuignium,  in  imitation  of  the  repository  used  by  the  Romans  for  holding  their 
statues,  which  were  the  signs  of  their  nobilicy  before  the  use  of  arms. 

Most  of  the  funeral  solemnities  still  U'^ed  in  Europe,  as  well  as  armorial  ensigns,, 
are  from  the  customs  of  the  ancient  Romans,  and  seem  to  represent  them,  either 
in  consuming  bodies  of  their  dead,  with  their  ensigns  of  honour,  in  pompous  piles 
of  lire,  or  in  their  custom  of  interring  them  in  graves,  and  adorning  the  places 
with  them. 

Another  piece  of  funeral  pomp,  is  called  the  fiery  chapel,  cbapelle  ardente,  by 
the  Latins /)j7\7,  or  capella  ardens,  being  composed  of  a  heap  of  combustible  matter, 
artificially  set  up  in  the  church,  after  the  fashion  of  a  funeral  pile  ;  in  the  middle  of 
which,  when  set  in  flames,  is  to  be  seen  a  coflin  (representing  the  true  one  in- 
terred) covered  with  black  silk,  adorned  with  crown,  sceptre,  sword,  globe,  and 
other  regalia,  with  the  ensigns  of  arms  of  the  prince,  there  consumed  ;  and  this 
royal  machine  of  fire  is  allowed  to  none  but  to  princes,  and  was  so  decided  in  the 
Court  of  Brabant,  2ist  of  August  1659. 

As  for  the  custom  of  burying  the  bodies  of  princes  and  great  men  with  their 
regalia  and  ensigns,  Quintus  Curtius  tells.  That  the  grave  of  Cyrus  being  opened 
by  the  order  of  Alexander  the  Great,  there  was  found  his  shield,  two  bows,  and  a 
battle-axe.  Chiffletius  says.  When  the  grave  of  Childeric  King  of  France  was 
opened,  there  were  found  by  his  body,  his  sword,  and  other  ornaments,  with  little 
pieces  of  metal  formed  like  flower-de-luces,  bis  armorial  figures,  which  some  said, 
represented  bees,  upon  which  they  ascribe  bees  for  the  ancient  arms  of  that  king- 
dom, by  mistake. 

In  the  grot  or  cave  in  the  church"  of  St  Stephen  at  Vienna,  where  the  Austrian, 
family  bury,  the  body  of  Albertus  was  found,  with  his  sword ;  upon  the  hilt  were 
the  arms  of  Austria  Ancient  and  Modern,  and  on  the  blade  those  of  Hapsburg; 
though  it  has  been  in  use  to  bury  some  ensigns  v/ith  the  defunct,  yet  those  before 
■mentioned  were  exposed  above  ground  also. 

The  hanging  of  churches,  houses,  and  other  places  with  black,  upon  the 
decease  of  great  men,  w"as  customary  with  the  Romans,  who  put  themselves, 
coaches,  and  chariots,  and  other  utensils,  in  mourning  upon  funeral  occasions  ; 
but  as  Diodor.  Sicul.  lib.  20.  observes.  The  Carthaginians  exceeded  them  in 
their  public  mournings,  for  they  hung  the  walls  of  their  city  with  black, 
and  sometimes  their  fleet  of  ships,  upon  the  death  of  their  chief  comman- 
ders. 

The  same  formality  has  continued  all  Europe  over  to  this  time,  not  only  in 
putting  mournings  upon  the  friends  of  the  deceased,  and  their  utensils,  but  in 
covering  the  insides  of  their  houses,  burying-places,  and  churches,  with  black, 
some  with  painting,  others  with  black  cloth,  and  adorning  them  with  the  arms  and 
symbolical  quarters  of  the  deceased,  and  other  signs  of  death,  as  tears,  mort-heads, 
and  such  like. 

There  is  another  piece  of  funeral  pomp  mentioned  by  the  French,  which  I 
have  not  heard  practised  with  us,  called  the  funeral  belt,  zona  higiibris,  and  by 
the  French  le  litre,  which  surrounds  burying-places,  chapels,  and  churches  with- 
out ;  and  for  sovereign  princes  may  be  made  ol  black  silk,  but  for  illustrious  no- 
bility of  black  cloth,  two  feet  in  breadth,  adorned  with  the  arms  and  symbolical 
quarters  of  the  deceased.  Philibert  Monet  says,  by  the  laws  of  France  none  can 
have  this  mourning-ribbon,  or  le  litre,  but  those  that  are  great  lords,  founders,  and 
patrons  of  churches.  To  insist  no  further  of  funeral  solemnities,  now  used, 
and  originally  from  those  of  the  Romans,  I  shall  put  an  end  with  this  ob- 
serve, 

I 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  147 

That  as  arms,  as  ensigns  of  nobility,  came  in  place  of  the  statues  and  images 
of  the  noble  Romans,  so  are  they  exposed  in  all  sorts  of  solemnities,  as  the  i\t)- 
mans  had  then-  statues,  and  especially  at  their  funerals,  which  were  carried  along 
with  the  deceased,  to  show  his  noble  descent.  Tacitus  tells.  That  twenty  images 
were  carried  at  the  funeral  of  Manlius,  and  as  many  at  that  of  (^nntus  ;  and  speak- 
ing of  the  funeral  pomp  of  Drusus,  he  says.  It  was  pleasant  to  biliold  the  statues 
of  ^^neas,  the  first  of  the  Julian  family,  those  of  the  Albanian  kings,  next  the 
Sabinan  statues,  and  then  those  of  the  Claudian  family,  all  marching  in  a 
comelv  procession.  And  not  to  add  other  instances  of  carrying  these  statues  a'* 
proofs  of  nobility,  from  other  authors  and  poets,  1  shall  only  mention  that  of 
Horace : 

Esto  beatus,  tiinus  atque  imagines- 
Ducunt  triumphales  tuum. 

After  the  solemnity  was  over,  the  image  of  the  defunct  was  set  up  before 
the  door  of  his  house,  as  we  do  with  the  funeral  escutcheon  of  our  dead, 
for  the  honour  and  encouragement  of  the  femily  to  live  nobly  and  virtu- 
ously. 

As  to  what  further  concerns  the  funeral  solemnities  of  other  nations,  we  must 
refer  our  reader  to  their  respective  historians  that  treat  of  these  subjects,  and  shall 
conclude  this  chapter  with  a  description  of  the  funeral  solemnities  observed  at  the 
interment  of  the  high  and  potent  Prince  John  Duke  of  Rothes,  Lord  High  Chan- 
cellor of  Scotland,  the  23d  day  of  August  1681,  according  as  I  took  the  same  from 
a  fine  draught  and  figure  thereof,  done  with  China  ink^  in  four  large  sheets  of 
Lombard  paper,  which  proceeded  as  follows. 

First,  Two  regiments,  with  the  artillery  and  equipage,  marched  all  before  in  a 
mourning  posture :  Next  followed  two  conductors  with  crapes  in  their  hat?,  and 
black  staves  over  their  shoulders  ;  then  the  little  gumpheon  carried  upright,  which 
was  of  a  square  figure,  and  embatded  round,  carried  up  by  a  staff  traversing  the 
middle  backward,  being-  charged  with  a  mort-head,  and  two  shank-bones  in  saltier, 
and,  in  an  escrol  above,  Memtnto  mori,  which  was  borne  by  a  person  in  a  side 
mourning  cloak  and  crape  ;  and  on  his  left  side  marched  another  in  the  same 
dress,  bearing  up  another  banner  of  the  like  form,  charged  with  a  sand-glass  set 
on  a  pair  of  wings,  with  this  motto  above,  Fugit^  bora  :  Next  followed  fifty-one 
poor  men  in  gown^  and  hoods,  the  first  bearing  up  a  banner  of  a  square  form, 
charged  with  the  duke's  arms  and  coronet  within  a  ducal  mantle  ;  the  rest  march- 
ing two  and  two,  carry  up  each  a  like  square  banner,  by  a  staff  traversing  the 
middle  backward,  charged  with  the  duke's  arms  in  a  shield,  ensigned  with  his  co- 
ronet :  Next,  a  trumpet  mounted  on  horseback,  having  the  flag  of  his  trumpet 
charged  with  the  duke's  whole  achievement  ;  after  followed  a  cavalier  armed  at 
all  points,  also  mounted  on  horseback,  and  holding  up  a  spear  erect,  with  capari- 
sons on  his  horse  :  next,  the  colours  of  the  defunct  in  a  banner  borne  up  by  a 
gentleman  in  a  mourning-cloak  and  crape  by  a  staff  at  one  of  the  ends ;  then  fol- 
lowed the  defunct's  servants,  in  number  twelve,  two  and  two,  in  mourning-cloaks 
and  crapes  :  Next  marched  the  pencil  of  honour,  which  divides  in  two  points  at 
the  end,  charged  with  the  duke's  whole  armoriar  bearing  ;  in  another  banner  the 
coat  of  Abernethy,  and  in  a  third  the  coat  of  Leslie,  each  within  a  laurel  garland, 
and  then  followed  the  standard  of  honour,  charged  also  with  the  duke's  entire 
bearing  ;  each  of  these  banners  are  borne  up  by  persons  in  mourning-cloaks  and 
crapes,  with  sta\-es  at  one  of  the  ends,  «nd  all  of  them  fringed  with  the  liveries 
and  colours  of  the  duke  :  Next  marched  the  horse  of  war,  led  by  two  lacquies 
of  the  defunct  bareheaded  :  Next,  two  close  trumpets  in  black  cloaks  and  crapes, 
the  flags  of  their  trumpets  charged  with  the  duke's  arms  ;  after  marched  two  pur- 
suivants, viz.  Bute  and  Carrick  in  gowns,  with  their  coats  displayed  above  the  same, 
and  black  side-crapes  in  their  hats;  then  the  great  gumpheon  or  mort-head  charg- 
ed as  aforesaid.  Next,  the  coat  of  Abernethy,  surrounded  with  a  laurel  in  mourn- 
ing, and  after  that  the  little  mourning-standard,  divided  in  two  points  at  the  end, 
charged  with  the  duke's  whole  arms ;  each  of  these  three  banners  are  borne  up  by 

Vol.  n.  3T 


I4S  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

a  staft'  at  one  of  the  ends,  by  persons  in  mourning-cloaks  and  crapes:  Next  march- 
ed fourteen  gentlemen  of  the  defunct's  friends,  two  and  two,  in  side  mourning- 
cloaks  and  crapes :  Next  two  pursuivants,  viz.  Kintyre  and  Dingwall,  in  gowns  sur- 
mounted with  their  coats  displayed,  and  long  crapes  in  their  hats;  then  followed 
the  spurs,  the  gauntlets,  the  croslet,  the  targe,  the  helmet,  wreath,  and  crown,  the 
sword,  each  borne  upon  a  spear,  by  as  many  gentlemen  marching  after  other  in 
long  black  cloaks  and  crapes  ;  then  the  defunct's  saddle  or  pad-horse  led  by  two 
lacquies  in  liveries  bareheaded :  Next,  the  late  counsellors  of  Edinburgh  in  num- 
ber twelve  ;  then  the  present  counsellors  thereof,  of  the  like  number,  in  their 
robes  with  crapes  in  their  hats,  two  and  two  ;  then  the  four  bailies  of  Edin- 
burgh, two  and  two,  in  their  robes,  and  battons  or  white-rods  m  their  hands  ; 
then  followed  the  sword  and  mace  of  the  city,  carried  by  persons  in  gowns,  with 
caps  of  permission,  the  sword  erect  in  pale  in  the  hand  of  the  one,  and  the  mace 
over  the  shoulder  of  the  other  ;  then  followed  the  Lord  Provost  of  Edinburgh, 
walking  by  himself,  clothed  in  his  side  robes,  with  his  white  rod  in  his  hand; 
then  the  clergy  of  Edinburgh,  two  and  two,  the  masters  of  colleges  two  and 
two,  the  Principal  following  alone,  and  all  in  their  gowns,  with  crapes :  Next, 
gentlemen  and  barons,  two  and  two,  in  long  black  cloaks;  then  the  writers  to  the 
signet,  two  and  two,  in  the  like  cloaks :  then  the  advocates  of  session,  clerks  of 
the  council  and  session,  and  commissaries  of  Edinburgh,  each  in  their  gowns, 
marching  two  and  two ;  then  the  macers  of  session,  two  and  two,  in  their  gowns 
bareheaded,  with  the  maces  over  their  shoulders  :  Next,  followed  the  fourteen 
Lords  of  Session  in  their  govms,  two  and  two ;  and  after  marched  the  President 
by  himself  in  his  gown ;  then  followed  the  Lord  Chancellor's  gown,  carried  in 
the  two  hands  of  a  gentleman  in  a  black  cloak  ;  then  the  officers  of  state  who 
are  not  noblemen,  viz.  first  the  Lord  Register,  and  Lord  Justice-Clerk ;  then  the 
Lord  Treasurer-Depute  with  a  rod  in  his  hand,  and  the  Lord  Advocate,  all  in 
their  gowns  :  Next,  followed  the  barons  or  lords,  two  and  two,  in  side  mourn- 
ing-cloaks;  then  the  bishops,  two  and  two,  in  their  gowns ;  then  the  viscounts, 
earls  and  marquisses,  two  and  two,  in  side  mourning-cloaks :  Next,  two  pursui. 
vants,  viz.  Unicorn  and  Ormond,  in  black  gowns  surcharged  with  their  coats 
displayed  ;  then  followed  two  close  trumpets  with  black  cloaks,  their  trumpets 
flagged  with  the  duke's  arms :  Next  marched  eight  banners,  borne  up  by  the  fol- 
lowing gentlemen  walking  two  and  two,  viz.  the  first  banner  charged  with  that 
of  the  armorial  arms  of  the  Earl  of  Roxburgh,  and  borne  by  Thomas  M'Dowall 
of  Makerston  ;  the  second  charged  with  the  arms  of  the  Duke  of  Antragne,  sur- 
rounded with  the  Order  of  St  Michael,  borne  up  by  Sir  William  Hope,  brother 
to  Hopeton  ;  the  third  charged  with  the  arms  of  Hamilton  of  Evandale,  and 
borne  up  by  the  laird  of  Gilkercleugh  ;  the  fourth  charged  with  the  arms  of 
the  Earl  of  Tullibardin,  borne  up  by  Mungo  Haldane  of  Gleneagles;  the  fifth  charged 
Avith  the  arms  of  the  Earl  of  Perth,  borne  up  by  the  laird  of  Hawthornden ;  the 
sixth  charged  with  the  Duke  of  Lennox's  arms,  borne  up  by  Mr  William  Gordon, 
Advocate;  the  seventh  charged  with  the  arms  of  the  Earl  of  Rothes,  borne  up  by 
Sir  John  Leslie  of  Newton  ;  and  the  eighth  and  last  charged  with  the  arms  of 
the  Earl  of  Marr,  borne  up  by  Sir  John  Erskine,  brother  to  Alva  :  all  which  gen- 
tlemen are  in  black  cloaks,  and  these,  with  the  nobility  and  others  above,  had  all 
black  crapes  in  their  hats  :  Next  follows  the  mourning-horse  covered  with  black 
cloth,  adorned  with  the  duke's  arms,  and  led  by  two  lacquies  bareheaded  ;  then 
marches  the  great  mourning-banner,  charged  with  the  duke's  whole  achievement, 
and  borne  up  by  the  master  of  Newark  in  a  mourning  cloak  and  crape  :  Next 
follow  six  heralds  walking  two  and  two  yi  mourning-gowns  or  cloaks,  with  their 
coats  displayed  above  the  same  ;  the  first,  viz.  Hay  herald  carrying  the  arms  of 
Leslie  within  a  cartouch  ;  the  second,  Albany  carrying  the  coat  of  Abernethy 
within  the  like  ;  the  third,  Marchmont  carrying  the  duke's  crest,  motto  and 
wreath  ;  the  fourth,  Rothsay  carrying  the  duke's  helmet,  coronet  and  mantle  ; 
the  fifth,  Snowdown  carrying  the  sword;  and,  the  sixth,  carrying  the  target;  and 
after  these  heralds  follow  the  domestics  of  the  defunct,  viz.  first,  two  chirur- 
geons ;  and  next  two  secretaries  in  black  cloaks,  then  two  chaplains  in  their 
gowns,  and  then  two  doctors  of  physic  inblack  cloaks,  and  next  eight  lacquies 
of   the   defunct  ;     all    which    domestics   walked    bareheaded ;    then   follows    his 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  149 

horse  and  furniture  fitted  us  for  riding  of  Parliament,  led  by  the  duke's  gentle- 
man of  hordes  bareheaded  in  a  side  black  cloak  ;  then  follows  the  duke's  coronet, 
witli  the  cap,  carried  oa  a  velvet  cushion  by  a  gentleman  in  a  black  cloak  and 
crape  ;  and  next  follows  the  two  archbishops  in  their  gowns  with  crapes  ;  then 
followed  the  Lord  Lyoii  in  a  mourning  cloak,  with  his  coat  displayed  above  the 
same,  carrying  before  hiiU  the  escutcheon  or  lozenge  structure,  adorned  with  the 
duke^s  whole  armorial  bearing,  supported  on  the  dexter  hand  by  Sir  Robert  Sin- 
clair, Baronet,  and,  on  the  sinister,  by  Sir  Charles  Erskme,  Baronet,  both  in  black 
cloaks  and  crapes  :  Next  followed  the  laird  of  Mfldrum,  as  commander  in  chief  of 
his  majesty's  forces,  with  his  batton  in  his  hand,  supported  on  the  dexter  hand  by 
Sir  Tliomas  Moncrieff,  as  once  high  treasurer,  with  a  rod  in  his  hand,  and,  on  the 
sinister,  by  the  usher,  with  his  mace  over  his  shoulder,  all  in  black  cloaks  and  crapes; 
then  followed  two  macers  of  the  privy  council  in  their  gowns  bareheaded,  with 
their  maces  over  their  shoulders  ;  then  after  followed  the  chancellor's  purse  and 
seal,  borne  i^p  by  a  gentleman  in  a  black  cloak  bareheaded,  and,  on  his  left-hand, 
the  chancellor's  mace  bnrne  over  tire  shoulder  of  another  gentleman  bareheaded  in 
a  mourning-cloak:  Next  followed  the  pallor  the  nTort-cloth,  adorned  with  the  duke's 
arms  and  these  of  his  relations,  as  also  with  mort-heads,  tears,  and  the  initial  let- 
ters of  J.  D.  R.  for  John  Duke  of  Rothes,  ensigned  on  the  top  with  his  ducal  co- 
ronet ;  which  pall  was  borne  by  these  noble  relations,  viz.  the  Duke  of  Hamilton, 
the  Marquisses  of  Douglas  and  Athol,  the  Earls  of  Airth,  Buchan,  Cassilis,  Linlith- 
gow, Perth,  Roxburgh,  Queensberry,  Tweeddale,  and  Tarras,  the  Lords  Cardross, 
Pitsligo,  and  Newark ;  and  the  canopy  or  pale,  adorned  in  the  same  manner  as 
the  mort-cloth,  was  supported  by  the  following  noblemen's  sons,  viz.  Lord  Murray, 
Lord  Charles  Hamilton,  Lords  Lorn,  Keith,  Livingston,  Glammis,  Crichton,  Ogil- 
vie,  Yester,  Boyd,  Cochran,  Inverury,  Lord  Charles  Murray,  Lord  James  Murray, 
Masters  of  Kingston,  Forbes,  Ross,  Balmerino,  Burleigh,  Melvdl,  and  Pitsligo,  be- 
sides several  barons,  knights,  and  gentlemen,  who  attended  near  the  body  to  assist 
and  relieve  the  noblemen  in  their  turns,  all  in  black  cloaks  and  side  crapes.  The 
deep  mourners  follow  next  in  gowns  and  hoods,  two  and  two,  to  the  number  of 
twelve  ;  the  Marquis  of  Montrose  and  Earl  of  Haddington,  sons-in-law  to  the  de- 
funct, walk  first ;  and  there  was  ten  lords  assistants  to  the  chief  mourners  in  black 
cloaks,  bearing  up  their  trains  bareheaded  ;  and  after  them  follows  the  defunct's 
mourning  coach  drawn  by  six  horses  covered  with  black,  and  adorned  with  mort- 
heads,  tears,  &-C.  and  led  by  six  lacquies,  and  a  postilion,  all  in  black,  the  coach- 
man having  on  a  black  gown  :  Next  succeeds  two  trumpets  and  a  kettle-drum 
mounted  on  horseback,  followed  by  his  majesty's  troop  of  guards,  which  conclud- 
ed the  solemnity. 

N.B.  Roderick  Chalmers,  Ross  herald,  and  herald- painter  in  Edinburgh,  to  whom 
we  are  obliged  for  the  preceding  chapter  of  quarters,  proofs  of  nobility,  desired 
us  to  acquaint  all  persons  who  shall  please  to  cause  make  out  their  genealogical 
quarters,  proofs  of  nobility,  according  to  the  preceding  scheme,  that  he  will  mark 
them  down  in  his  books  gratis  ;  his  only  design  being  to  prevent  mistakes  that 
may  happen  when  things  of  that  nature  are  required  of  him  to  be  done  in  haste. 
— That  as  he  has  no  advantage  in  view  by  doing  so,  other  than  the  pleasure  of 
serving  those,  to  whom  he  has  been,  or  may  be  obliged,  and  that  when  any  affair  of 
that  kind  is  demanded,  he  may  be  able,  from  his  registers,  to  perform  it  with  just- 
ticc  and  exactness ;  he  therefore  expects  they  will  not  neglect  the  opportunity  of 
do'iig  themselves  this  service  ;  and  to  secure  their  pains  from  being  lost,  he  is  re- 
solvr-d  to  leave  all  such  genealogical  accounts,  so  given  in  to  him,  in  such  a  pub- 
lic manner  at  his  decease,  as  shall  effectually  preserve  them  for  the  use  of  posre  ■ 
rity. 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


CHAP.    XV. 

OF    CAVALCADES    AND    PUBLIC    PROCESSIONS. 

FORASMUCH  as  all  cavalcades,  royal  and  public  processions,  and  the  solemnities 
thereof,  have  been  always  committted  to  the  ordering  and  marshalling  of 
the  Lord  Lyon  and  his  brethren  heralds,  we  shall,  for  the  greater  embellishment 
of  this  book,  and  satisfaction  of  our  readers,  proceed  next  to  subjoin,  from  authen- 
tic copies,  some  whereof  never  before  in  print,  the  form  and  manner  of  the  coro- 
nation of  our  kings,  the  royal  baptism  of  Henry  Prince  of  Scotland  in  Stirling 
Castle,  30th  August  1594,  the  splendour  of  the  riding  of  our  Parliament  at  Edin- 
burgh, July  25th  1681,  as  recorded  in  the  Books  of  Privy  Council  and  Lyon  Re- 
gisters, the  solemn  creation  of  our  nobility,  demonstrated  in  the  creation  of  the 
Marquisses  of  Hamilton  and  Huntly  at  Holyroodhouse,  17th  April  1599,  &.c. 
whereby  a  brief  view  of  the  greatness  and  splendour  of  this  kingdom  of  old  will 
be  made  appear ;  and  shall  conclude  all  with  some  observes  on  the  office  and  duty 
of  our  heralds. 


THE   ANCIENT   FORM    OF   THE    CORONATION    OF   THE   KINGS    OF    SCOTLAND. 

In  the  morning,  when  the  king  is  in  his  bed-camber,  there  cometh  to  him  two 
bishops,  two  abbots,  and  twenty.four  other  churchmen,  four  noblemen,  together 
with  the  Constable  and  Marischal  having  the  battons  in  their  hands,  and  with  them 
four  or  six  commissioners  of  burghs;  then  the  king  is  brought  forth,  supported 
by  the  Marisehal  and  Constable,  one  on  every  side,  and  is  brought  to  another 
room,  which  is  the  Presence,  and  is  set  under  a  cloth  of  state  that  is  open,  to  de- 
clare that  the  king  has  not  yet  received  the  crown,  which  must  be  closed  after  the 
coronation. 

The  kirkmen,  nobility,  and  burghers  in  order,  ask  of  the  king,  if  he  be  la\vfal 
successor  to  his  father,  and  be  willing  to  accept  the  dignity  of  the  crown  ?  which 
they  all  otTer  to  his  majesty  ;  then  must  be  reckoned  six  genealogies  to  whom  he 
hath  succeeded. 

Upon  the  king's  granting  to  accept,  the  bishops  and  all  the  rest  touch  the  pale, 
and  cause  it  to  be  half  covered,  and  say,  God  bless  you.  Sir ;  and  they  all  sing, 
God  bless  him  tis  he  did  bis  forefathers. 

Then  the  Marischal  calls  in  the  Lyon  King  at  Arms,  who,  with  his  brethren 
heralds,  and  the  pursuivants,  come  in  their  coats,  and  sit  down  before  the  king, 
and  there  the  Marischal  is,  by  the  mouth  of  the  Bishop  of  St  Andrew's,  to  swear 
the  Lyon,  S*-c.  who  being  sworn  and  crowned  with  an  open  crown,  and  having  the 
sword  and  sceptre  raised  by  two  of  his  brethren  heialds,  they  come  forth  to  the 
theatre  where  the  king  is  to  be  crowned,  the  bishops,  nobility,  and  burghs'  com- 
missioners being  with  him. 

The  Marischal  sayeth  to  the  Lyon,  Show  the  king's  pleasure;  and  he  says  to  the 
people.  The  king  is  willing  to  accept  the  crown. 

Then  the  commissioners  say,  God  bless  hiin  that  should  be  king;  and  the  people 
cry.  Bring  him  to  us;  God  bless  him,  and  us  for  his  cause. 

Then  the  Lyon  returns  with  the  bishops.  Constable  and  Marischal,  and  the 
bishops  acquaint  the  king  that  the  people  call  for  him  earnestly  to  accept  the 
crown,  and  to  be  crowned. 

Then  the  Lyon,  having  his  crown  on  his  head,  and  two  heralds  the  sword  and 
sceptre,  the  rest  going  before,  they  cry.  Here  comes  the  king;  and  the  people  an- 
swer, God  bless  him.  The  bishops  go,  one  on  the  right,  and  the  other  on  the  left 
hand,  at  his  out-coming.  The  king  is  in  his  ordinary  apparel,  only  leaving  his 
clothes  open  to  the  boughts  of  his  arms,  and  shoulder  points,  and  his  cloak  about 
him.  The  ?4arischal  and  Constable  carry  the  robes.  Great  Seal  and,spurs,  which 
are  all  laid  down  upon  a  taifel,  or  board,  before  the  king  in  the  church;  and  then 
the  bishop  is  for  to  preach. 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  i  .^  r 

All  the  ground  betwixt  the  king's  chamber  and  chapel  is  covered  with  blue 
cloth,  and  the  churchmen  sing  and  all  the  people.  The  king  being  set  on  his 
throne,  the  bishop  asks  at  the  tour  corners  of  the  throne,  I  strange  if  they  be  pleased 
to  have  their  king  so  resting  their  chief.  Thereafter,  when  they  are  pleased  to  have 
him,  there  is  sung  an  anthem,  viz.  Firmetur  mamis  tua.  Thereafter  the  king 
descends  from  his  throne  to  the  altar,  and  offering  the  sword,  and  cloak,  and  robes, 
and  sayeth,  Non  appnrebis  vacuus  in  conspectu  Domini. 

Thereafter  two  piggs  of  oil  are  carried  by  the  Lyon,  the  one  he  giveth  to  tlie 
Constable,  and  the  other  to  the  Marischal,  and  they  give  that  to  the  bishops,  who 
pour  the  same  on  the  king's  head,  one  on  the  one  side,  and  the  other  on  the  other 
side,  and  they  anoint  and  oil  him  in  the  boughts  of  his  arms,  palms  of  his  hands, 
and  the  tops  of  his  shoulders,  and  other  places;  and  the  bishops  have  their  own 
prayers  and  words  at  his  anointing. 

Then  the  Marischal  and  Constable  take  up  his  doublet,  and  put  it  on;  the  Con- 
stable and  Marischal  take  up  the  robes,  and  give  them  to  the  bishops,  and  they  put 
them  on  upon  the  king ;  and  at  every  piece  they  put  on,  they  sing  or  say,  and  pray 
like  unto  this,  Indue  regem  tunica  justitia. 

When  the  robes  are  put  on,  the  Lyon  takes  off  his  crown,  and  lays  it  down  near 
the  place  where  the  king's  crown  lies,  and  coming  to  the  Marischal  says  these  words, 
I  surrender,  and  command  the  king  to  be  crowned,  repeating  six  genealogies  of  his 
descent. 

Then  the  crown  is  put  upon  the  king's  head,  and  the  bishop  cries  aloud,  God 
bless  the  king;  and  then  another  cries,  God  bless  the  people  and  the  king;  and  over 
again,  God  bless  king  and  people. 

And  when  the  crown  is  on  the  king's  head,  the  king  promises  by  oath,  taken  by 
the  bishops,  to  be  a  loving  father  to  the  people,  in  the  words  thought  good  at  that 
time  by  the  bishops.  But  now  the  form  of  the  oath  is  set  down  by  special  act  of 
Parliament  made  by  King  James  VI.  of  blessed  memory,  in  his  first  Parliament, 
cap.  8.  Then  the  Marischal  having  in  his  hand  the  obligatory  oath  of  the  people, 
goeth  to  the  four  nooks  of  the  theatre,  reads  it  to  the  Lyon,  and  he  cries  it  out  to 
the  people,  who  hold  up  all  their  hands,  and  say  all  Amen. 

The  Constable  takes  off  the  crown,  and  lays  it  down  before  the  king,  and  the 
bishops  put  on  the  king's  coat  on  him.  Then  the  Lyon,  by  direction,  calleth  the  roll 
of  the  whole  nobility,  who  coming,  sit  down  upon  their  knees,  and  touch  the  crown, 
and  say  thir  words.  So  may  God  help  me,  as  I  shall  support  thee;  and  when  they 
have  done,  they  all  hold  up  their  hands,  and  say  again,  /  swear,  and  I  hold  up  my 
hand. 

■  Then  are  psalms  sung,  and  trumpets  sounded ;  the  heralds,  people,  and  all  cry^ 
God  bless  and  keep  the  king. 

At  the  out-going  the  king  gives  to  be  carried  before  him  the  crown,  sceptre, 
sword,  and  Great  Seal,  by  the  Chancellor  and  other  of  the  nobility,  and  so  they 
march  furth  as  they  came  in,  with  the  Lyon  and  the  re  t  of  his  brethren ;  tht 
Constable  and  Marischal  going  behind  to  hold  up  and  carry  the  king's  train  uf  lii-^ 
robes. 

The  Marischal  with  his  own  hands  puts  on  the  boots  and  spurs,  and  takes  them 
off  again,  when  the  king  goes  in. 


AN    EXACT    ACCOUNT    OF    THE    BAPTISM    OF    HENRY    PRINCE    OF    SCOTLAND, 

August  30.  1594. 

The  noble  and  most  potent  Prince  of  Scotland  was  born  in  the  castle  of  Stirling 
upon  Tuesday  the  19th  day  of  February  1594.  Upon  which  occasion  the  king's 
majesty  sent  for  the  nobles  of  his  land,  and  to  all  the  capital  burghs  thereof,  to 
have  their  advice,  how  he  should  proceed  for  the  due  solemnization  of  his  royal 
baptism,  and  what  princes  he  should  send  to.  When  they  were  all  compeared, 
with  great  diligence  and  good  will,  he  proponed  unto  them,  that  it  was  nec-ssary 
to  direct  our  ambassadors  to  France,  England,  Denmark,  Low-Countries,  the  Duke 
of  Brunswick  his  brother-in-law,  and  to  the  Duke  of  Magdeburg,  the  queen's 
majesty's  grandfather,  and  to  such  other  princes  as  should  be  thought  expedient. 

Vol.  II.  3  U 


J  52  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

Likewise,  lie  thought  the  castle  of  Stirling  the  most  convenient  place  for  the  tl- 
sidence  of  this  most  noble  and  mighty  prince,  in  respect  that  he  was  born  there. 
As  also,  it  was  necessary,  that  suliicient  preparation  might  be  made  for  the  am- 
bassadors that  should  be  invited  to  come,  for  honour  of  the  crown  and  country. 
And  beside  all  this,  because  the  chapel-royal  was  ruinous,  and  too  little,  concluded, 
that  the  old  chapel  should  be  utterly  razed,  and  a  new  one  erected  in  the  bame 
place,  that  should  be  more  large,  long,  and  glorious,  to  entertam  the  great  number 
of  strangers  expected.  These  propositions  considered  at  length,  they  all,  with  a 
free  voluntary  deliberation,  granted  unto  his  majesty  the  sum  of  an  hundred 
thousand  pounds  money  of  Scotland.  Then  were  there  ambassadors  elected  to  pass 
into  France,  England,  Denmark,  the  Low-Countries,  and  other  places  before 
mentioned ;  who  were  all  dispatched  with  such  expedition,  and  their  legacies  took 
such  wished  effect,  that  first  there  came  two  famous  men  from  the  King  of  Den- 
raaik,  the  one  Christianus  Bernekow,  the  other  Sienio  Bille.  These  came  to  Leith 
the  i6th  of  July.  The  next  day  after  them  came  Adamus  Crusius,  ambassador 
for  the  Duke  of  Brunswick,  and  Joachimus  Besseuitius,  ambassador  for  the  Duke 
of  Magdeburg,  who  is  grandfather  to  the  noble  Princess  Anne,  by  the  grace  of 
God  Qiieen  of  Scotland.  Thirdly,  the  3d  day  of  August,  there  came  ambassadors 
from  tae  states  of  Holland  and  Zealand,  the  Baron  of  Braderod,  and  the  Treasurer 
of  Zealand,  called  Jacobus  Falkius. 

There  was  also  a  nobleman  directed  from  England,  to  wit,  the  Earl  of  Cumber- 
land, who,  even  when  he  had  prepared  himself  richly  and  honourably  in  all  re- 
spects for  his  voyage,  to  come  to  Scotland,  and  divers  noblemen  and  gentlemen 
of  renown  prepared  and  commanded  for  his  honourable  convoy,  it  pleased  God  tO' 
visit  him  with  sickness,  and,  in  that  respect,  another  nobleman  was  chosen  to  supply 
his  place,  which  was  the  Earl  of  Sussex,  &.C.  and  he,  in  consideration  of  his  short 
and  unexpected  advertisement,  made  such  diligence  in  his  voyage,  and  magnifi- 
cence for  his  own  person,  and  honourable  convoy,  as  was  thought  rare  and  rich  by- 
all  men :  whereby  it  fell  out,  that  betwixt  the  sickness  of  the  one  nobleman,  and 
the  hasty  preparation  of  the  other,  the  time  was  so  far  spent,  that  the  very  pre. 
fixed  days  of  the  baptism  were  sundry  times  delayed.  And,  because  the  am- 
bassador of  England  was  so  long  a-coming,  and  the  ambassadors  of  Denmark, 
Brunswick,  and  Magdeburg,  were  feared  to  be  hindered  in  their  voyage  by  the 
sea,  by  reason  of  the  near  approaching  of  winter,  they  desired  daily  of  the  king's 
majesty,  during  their  remaining  in  Edinburgh,  to  have  some  prefixed  day  to  be 
nominate  and  certainly  kept,  that  immediately  thereafter  they  might  be  dis- 
patched ;  which  he  granted  at  the  last,  although  he  had  divers  great  impediments, 
to  the  contrary.  The  first  was,  because  the  chapel-royal  and  castle  of  Stirhng  were 
not  fully  complete  m  all  such  necessaries  as  \Vere  requisite,  although  he  had  the 
supply  of  the  greatest  number  of  artificers  in  the  whole  country  convened  there, 
of  all  crafts,  for  that  service,  and  his  majesty's  own  person  daily  overseer,  with 
large  and  liberal  payment.  But  the  chiefest  cause  was,  the  long  absence  of  an 
ambassador  from  England,  which  his  majesty  greatly  respected  for  many  causes : 
And,  last  of  all,  expecting  that  some  ambassador  should  l:ave  come  from  France, 
which  fell  not  out,  as  was  looked  for.  But  when  the  ambassador  was  come  from 
England  to  Edinburgh,  forthwith  his  majesty  dispatched  one  of  the  gentlemen  of 
his  highness's  chamber,  to  request  him  to  repair  towards  Stirling  the  next  day, 
with  all  possible  diligence,  (which  was  the  28ih  day  of  August}  because  he  would 
have  had  the  baptism  administered  the  day  following.  But  neither  were  the  pro- 
pmes  sent  by  the  Q^ieen  of  England,  neitiier  her  ambassador's  own  carriages  as  then 
come;  therefore  the  baptism  was  delayed  until  the  30th  day  of  August,  as  ye^hall 
liear  particularly  hereafter. 

But,  in  the  mean  time,  it  is  to  be  understood  that  all  these  noble  ambassadors, 
before  expressed,  were  honourably  sustained  upon  the  king's  majesty's  own  proper 
costs,  during  the  whole  time  of  their  residence  in  Scotland,  save  only  the  am- 
bassador of  England,  whose  whole  expences  were  defiayed  by  his  sovereign  the 
Queen  of  England  ;  and,  because  the  rest  of  the  ambassadors  were  repaired  to  Stir- 
ling, by  his  majesty's  direction,  long  before  the  coming  ol'  the  English  ambassador, 
his  highness  bestowed  the  time  with  them  in  magnific  banqueting,  revelling,  and.' 
daily  hunting,  with  great  honour. 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


^So 


The  king's  majesty,  purposing  further  to  dccore  by  magnificence  this  action, 
committed  the  charge  thereof  to  the  Eord  of  Lindores,  and  Mr  Wilham  Fowler, 
who  by  their  travels,  dihgence,  and  invention,  brought  it  to  that  perfection,  which 
the  shortness  of  time  and  other  considerations  coidd  permit.  So  they  having  con- 
sulted together,  concluded  that  those  exercises  that  were  to  be  used  for  decora- 
tion of  that  solemnity  were  to  be  divided  both  in  field  pastimes,  with  martial  and 
heroical  exploits,  and  in  household,  with  rare  shows  and  singular  inventions. 

The  field  to  be  used  at  two  several  days;  the  first  to  be  of  three  Turks,  tliree 
Christian  Knights  of  Malta,  three  Amazons,  and  three  Moors.  But  by  reason  of 
the  absence,  or  at  the  least  the  uncertain  presence  of  the  three  last  gentlemen 
who  should  have  sustained  these  personages,  it  was  thoaglit  good  that  the  number 
of  that  mask  should  consist  of  nine  actors,  nine  pages,  and  nine  lacquies,  which 
coming  from  sundry  parts,  and  at  divers  times,  together  with  the  diversity  of  their 
apparel,  should  bring  some  novelty  to  the  beholders. 

The  place  most  expedient  for  this  action  was  the  valley,  near  the  castle,  which 
being  prepared  for  that  purpose,  both  with  carrier  and  scafiold,  after  the  coming 
of  the  queen's  majesty,  with  the  honourable  and  gallant  ladies,  together  with  her 
honourable  ambassadors,  the  field  being  beset  by  the  brave  yonkars  of  Edinburgh, 
■with  their  hagbuts,  during  the  whole  time  of  that  pastime. 

Then  three  Christians  entered  the  field  with  sound  of  trumpet,  who  were  the 
King's  Majesty,  the  Earl  of  Marr,  and  Thomas  Erskine,  (Gentleman  of  his  Majesty's 
Chamber)  who  made  up  this  number. 

A  little  after  followed  three  apparelled  like  Turks,  very  gorgeously  attired ;  and 
these  were  the  Duke  of  Lennox,  the  Lord  Home,  and  Sir  Robert  Ker  of  Cessford, 
knight. 

Last  of  all  came  in  three  Amazons  in  women's  attire,  very  sumptuously  clad  ; 
and  these  were  the  lord  of  Lindores,  the  Lord  of  Buccleugh,  and  the  Abbot  of 
Holyroodhouse.  So  all  these  persons  being  present,  and,  at  their  entry,  making 
their  reverence  to  the  Qj.ieen's  Majesty,  ambassadors  and  ladies,  having  their  pages 
riding  upon  their  led  horse,  and  on  their  left  arms  bearing  their  masters'  impress 
or  device. 

The  King's  Majesty's  was  a  lion's  head  with  open  eyes;  which  signifieth,  after  a 
mystic  and  hieroglyphic  sense.  Fortitude  and  vi^ilancy.  The  words  were  Timcat 
%3  primus  \S  iihimus  oibis.  The  second  was  a  dog's  collar,  all  beset  with  iron  pikes ; 
the  words  were  these,  Offdiidit  iS  defendit.  The  third  of  that  Christian  army  was 
a  windmill,  with  her  spokes  unmoving,  winds  unblowing  on  every  side,  with  these 
words,  Ni  sperat  imimta. 

The  second  faction  did  carry  these,  a  heart  half  in  fire,  and  half  in  frost;  on  the 
one  part  Cupid's  torch,  and  on  the  other  Jupiter's  thunder,  with  these  words,  lliuc 
amor,  i/ide  metus.  The  other  page,  a  zodiac,  and  in  thfe  same,  the  moon  far  op- 
posite to  the  sun,  with  these  words,  ^lo  remotior  liicidior;  that  is  to  say,  The  far- 
ther the  fairer.  The  third  of  this  party  carried,  painted,  four  coach  wheels,  the 
hindmost  following  the  foremost,  and  yet  nevei-  overtaking  them,  with  these  v/ords, 
^10  rtiajis  iiisequor. 

The  last  three  pages  bare  in  their  targets  these  impresses  following,  a  crown,  an 
eye,  and  a  portcullis;  tlie  crown  betokening  the  power  of  God,  the  eye  his  provi- 
dence, and  the  portcullis  his  protection ;  with  these  words,  which  were  composed 
in  anagram,  of  IValterus  Scotus,  the  Laird  of  Buccleugh's  name,  Claustis  tutus  era. 
The  second  page  of  this  party  carried  on  his  targe  the  portraiture  of  a  hand- 
holding  an  eel  by  the  tail,  alluding  to  the  uncertainty  of  persons  or  of  times,  with 
these  words,  Utfrustra,  sic  patienter.  The  last  was  this,  a  fire  in  sight  of  the  sun, 
burning,  and  not  perceived,  with  this  sentence,  Oblector  lumine  victus. 

And  every  lacquey  carrying  in  his  hand  his  master's  lance;  they  began  their 
pastime  by  running  at  the  ring  and  glove,  the  laws  whereof  were  these. 

First,  That  all  the  persons  of  this  pastime  compear  masked,  and  in  such  order  as 
they  come  into  the  field,  so  to  run  out  all  their  courses.  Secondly,  That  none  use 
any  other  ring  but  that  which  is  put  up,  and  use  no  other  lance  but  that  which 
they  have  brought  for  themselves.  Thirdly,  He  that  twice  touches  the  ring,  or 
stirs  it,  winneth  as  much  as  if  he  carried  away  the  ring.  Fourthly,  He  that  lets 
bis  lanee  fall  out  of  his  hand  is  deprived  of  all  the  rest  of  his  courses.     Fifibly,. 


154  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

That  every  one  run  with  loose  reins,  and  with  as  much  speed  as  his  horse  hath. 
Sixthly,  That  none  after  his  race,  in  uptaking  of  his  horse,  lay  his  lance  upoii  his 
shoulder,  under  the  pain  of  loss  of  that  which  he  hath  done  in  his  course. 
Seventhly,  He  that  carrieth  not  his  lance  under  his  arm  loseth  his  course.  Eighthly, 
That  none  until  his  three  courses  be  ended  change  his  horse,  if  he  be  not  hurt, 
or  upon  some  other  consideration  moved  to  change  him.  These  laws  being  seen 
and  approved  by  the  actors,  the  Queen's  Majesty  signified  unto  them,  that  he  who 
did  lun  best  should  have  for  his  reward  a  fair  and  rich  ring  of  diamonds:  And  he 
also  who  on  that  same  side  had  best  fortune  in  running,  he  should  be  acknow- 
ledged with  another  as  fair  as  the  first.  The  proof  hereof  being  made,  the  vic- 
tory fell  to  the  Duke  of  Lennox,  who  bringing  it  to  his  side  and  party  had  the 
praise  and  prize  adjudged  to  himself.  Thus  the  first  day's  pastime  was  ended, 
with  great  contentment  to  the  beholders,  and  commendation  of  the  persons  enter- 
prisers. 

The  second  day's  pastime  was  extended,  by  reason  that  the  artisans  were  em- 
ployed in  other  business,  who  should  have  followed  forth  that  invention  given 
them  :  And  seeing  the  grace  of  that  exercise  consisted  in  embossery,  and  the 
craftsmen  apt  for  the  same  otherwise  and  necessarily  busied,  it  was  left  off;  which, 
if  it  had  been  brought  to  effect,  this  country  had  not  seen,  nor  practised  a  more 
rare :  For  what  by  the  bravery  and  strange  apparel  of  the  persons  themselves,  and 
by  the  divers  shapes  of  the  beasts  that  should  have  been  borne  and  brought  there  in 
sight,  had  been  commendable  and  wonderful  :  By  reason  that  such  beasts,  as  lion, 
elephant,  hart,  unicorn,  and  the  griffin  ;  together  with  the  camel,  hydre,  croco- 
dile and  dragon,  (carrying  their  riders)  had  carried  also  with  it,  by  the  newness  of 
that  invention,  great  contentment  and  commendation  of  that  exercise.  But,  1  say, 
some  arismg  lets  impeshed  this  invention  ;  and  all  things  were  cast  off  that  might 
have  farther  decored  this  solemnity,  through  other  urgent  occasions. 

And  when  all  the  ambassadors  were  convened  together,  and  all  necessary  mate- 
rials ready,  the  chapel-royal  of  the  Castle  of  Stirling  was  richly  hung  with  costly 
tapestries :  and  at  the  north-east  end  of  the  same  a  royal  seat  of  estate  prepared 
for  the  king's  majesty  ;  and  on  his  right  hand  was  set  a  fair  wide  chair,  witir  the 
due  ornaments  pertaining  thereto,  over  which  was  set  the  arms  of  the  King  of 
France. 

Next  thereto  was  a  princely  traverse  of  crimson  taffeta,  for  the  ambassador  of 
England,  and  over  bis  head  the  arms  of  England.  On  the  desk  before  him  lay  a 
cushion  of  red  velvet :  there  stood  attending  on  him  two  gentlemen-ushers,  ap- 
pointed by  the  Qiieen  of  England  for  that  present  service. 

Next  unto  him  sat  Mr  Robert  Bowes,  Ambassador  Ordinary  for  the  Queen  of 
England.  On  the  desk  before  him  was  laid  a  cloth  of  purple  velvet,  and  cushion 
suitable  thereunto. 

Then  sat  the  ambassador  of  the.  noble  prince  Henricus  Julius,  Duke  of  Bruns- 
wick, and  befi-'re  him  on  the  desk  was  laid  a  cloth  of  green  velvet,  with  a  cushion 
of  the  same  ;  and  over  his  head  the  arms  of  his  prince. 

Next  unto  him  sat  the  ambassadors  of  the  Low-Countries,  with  a  long  fair  cloth 
spread  on  the  desk  before  them  of  blue  velvet,  and  two  cushions  suitable  thereun- 
to, and  over  their  heads  tlig  arms  of  their  countries. 

On  the  king's  left  hand  was  placed  nearest  his  majesty  the  two  ambassadors  of 
Denmark,  with  a  large  broad  cloth  spread  on  the  desk  before  them  of  purple  vel- 
vet, and  the  arms  of  Denmark  over  their  heads. 

Next  unto  them  sat  the  ambassador  of  the  noble  prince  Udalricus,  Duke  of  Mag- 
deburg, with  his  prince's  arms  over  his  head. 

In  the  midst  of  the  chapel-royal,  within  the  partition,  where  the  king's  majesty, 
the  ambassadors,  and  prince,  with  his  convoy,  were  placed,  there  was  a  new  pul- 
pit erected  ;  the  same  was  richly  hung  with  cloth  of  gold :  all  the  pavement  with- 
in this  partition  was  prince-like  laid  with  fine  tapestry. 

Under  the  pulpit  was  another  desk,  wherein  sat  in  the  midst  Mr  David  Cuning- 
ham,  Bishop  of  Aberdeen,  Mr  David  Lindsay,  Minister  of  Leith,  and  John  Dun- 
canson,  one  of  the  ordinary  ministers  to  the  king's  majesty  ;  before  whom  was  set 
a  table  covered  with  yellow  velvet. 

And  when  all  things  were  in  readiness,  as  was  requisite,  there  was  placed  a  hun- 

3 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS^.  15-5 

Jred  hagbutteers  (being  only  the  yonkers  of  Edinburgh,  bravely  apparelled)  in 
order,  betwixt  the  prince's  outer  chamber  door,  and  the  entry  to  the  chapel-royal, 
on  both  the  sides  of  the  passage. 

Then  the  king's  majesty,  with  his  nobles  and  counsellors  attending  on  him,  en- 
tered the  chape],  and  there  sat  down  111  his  royal  seat  of  state. 

All  the  ambassadors  likewise  were  sent  for,  and  conveyed  to  the  prince's  cham- 
ber of  presence,  where  the  prince  was  lying  on  his  bed  of  state,  richly  decored, 
and  wrought  with  broidered  work,  containing  the  story  of  Hercules  and  his  tra- 
vels. 

This  bed  was  erected  on  a  platform,  very  artificially,  with  a  foot-pace  of  three 
degrees  ascending  to  it ;  the  degrees  being  covered  with  tapestry,  all  wrought  with 
gold,  and  a  large  cloth  of  lawn  covering  both  the  bed  and  the  degrees,  which, 
reached  forth  a  great  space  over  the  floor. 

Then  the  old  Countess  of  Marr  with  reverence  past  to  the  bed,  she  took  up  the 
prince,  and  delivered  hmi  to  the  Duks  of  Lennox,  who  presently  rendered  hin\ 
likewise  to  the  ambassador  of  England,  to  be  borne  to  the  chapel-royal. 

The  Master  of  the  Ceremonies  addressing  himself  to  a  table  in  the  said  cham- 
ber, curiously  ordered,  whereon  stood  those  ornaments  of  honour  which  were  to 
be  borne  to  the  chapel  before  the  prince,  with  due  reverence  delivered  them  to 
certain  noblemen,  according  to  the  order  appointed  by  his  IVIajesty  for  the  bearing 
thereof. 

In  like  manner,  the  prince's  robe-royal,  being  of  purple  velvet,  very  richly  set 
with  pearl,  was  delivered  to  the  Duke  of  Lennox,  who  put  the  same  about  the 
prince,  the  train  whereof  was  borne  up  by  the  Lord  Sinclair  and  the  Lord  Ur- 
quhart.  Then  they  removed  themselves  to  the  outer  chamber,  where  there  was  a 
fair  high  pall  made  four-square  of  crimson  velvet  attending,  which  was  laid  on 
with  rich  pasements,  and  fringed  with  gold.  This  i^all  was  sustained  by  four  wor- 
shipful barons,  the  Laird  of  Buccleugh,  the  Constable  of  Dundee,  Sir  Robert  Kerr 
of  Cessford,  knight,  and  the  Laird  of  Traquair ;  under  the  which  pale  were  the 
ambassadors  of  England,  Robert  Earl  of  Sussex,  carrying  the  prince  in  his  arms, 
and  Mr  Robert  Bowes,  ordinary  ambassador  for  England,  assisting  him.  Next  to 
them  was  the  Duke  of  Lennox.  About  the  pale  were  the  ambassadors  of  Den- 
mark, Magdeburg,  Brunswick,  and  the  Estates.  There  followed  the  old  Countess 
of  Marr,  Mrs  Bowes,  divers  ladies  of  honour,  with  the  mistress  nurse. 

Then  the  trumpets  sounding  melodiously  before,  the  prince  and  his  convoy 
went  forward,  Lyon  King  at  Arms,  and  the  heralds  his  brethren,  with  their  coat- 
armours  in  goodly  order  following. 

Next  followed  the  prince's  honours,  borne  by  these  noblemen  ;  the  Lord  Semple 
carrying  a  laver  of  water ;  the  Lord  Seaton  a  fair  bason ;  the  Lord  Livingston  a 
towel,  and  the  Lord  Home  a  low  crown,  competent  for  a  duke,  richly  set  with 
diamonds,  sapphires,  rubies,  and  emeralds  ;  who  approaching  near  the  pulpit,  where 
these  honours  were  received  from  them  by  the  Master  of  the  Ceremonies,  and  by 
him  placed  on  the  table  before  the  pulpit,  the  noblemen  retiring  back  to  their  ap* 
pointed  places. 

Lastly,  The  pall  was  carried  in  before  the  pulpit,  where  the  ambassador  of  Eng- 
land rendered  the  prince  to  the  Duke  of  Lennox,  who  immediately  delivered  him 
to  the  old  Countess  of  Marr,  and  she  consequently  to  the  mistress  nurse;  and  all 
the  ambassadors  were  then  set  in  such  order  of  places,  as  the  demonstration  of  their 
armories  gave  notice. 

Without  the  partition  were  ornate  forms  all  covered  with  green,  whereupon 
were  placed  the  gentlemen  of  England,  Denmark,  Allemagne,  Flanders,  and  Scot- 
land. And  as  all  men  were  thus  competently  placed,  and  universal  silence  made, 
entered  Mr  Patrick  Galloway,  one  of  his  Majesty's  ordinary  preachers,  into  the 
pulpit,  who  learnedly  and  godly  entreated  upon  the  text  of  the  21st  of  Genesis. 
Which  being  done,  the  Bishop  of  Aberdeen  stood  up  in  his  seat,  and  taught  upon 
the  sacrament  of  baptism,  first  in  the  vulgar  tongue,  and  next  in  the  Latin,  to  the 
end  all  men  might  generally  understand.  This  done,  the  provost  and  prebends  of 
the  chapel-royal  did  sing  the  21st  psalm  of  David,  according  to  the  art  of  music, 
to  the  great  delectation  of  the  noble  auditory. 

Then  they  proceeded  to  the  action.     The   King  arose  and  came   towards  the 

Vol.  II.  3  X 


^5^ 


EXTEiaOR  ORNAMENTS. 


pulpit.  The  ambassadors  followed  in  their  order.  The  barons  that  carried  the 
pall  above  the  prhice  moved  towards  the  pulpit:  The  Duke  of  Lennox  received 
the  prince  from  the  Countess  of  Marr,  and  delivered  him  to  the  hands  of  the  Earl 
of  Sussex,  ambassador  for  England,  where  he  was  named  by  all  their  consents,  Frcde- 
derick  Henry,  Henry  Frederick,  and'  so  baptized  in  the  name  of  the  lather,  Son, 
and  Holy  Ghost,  by  the  said  names. 

This  being  done,  Lyon  King  at  Amis,  with  a  loud  voice,  repeats  these  names 
thrice  over ;  and  then  after  him,  the  rest  of  his  brethren  heralds,  with  trumpets 
sounding,  confirmed  the  same. 

Then  the  King's  Majesty,  ambassadors,  and  all  removing  to  their  places,  the 
English  ambassador  alone,  withdrawing  himself  on  the  one  side,  was  met  and  at- 
tended on  by  two  grooms,  who  humbly  on  their  knees,  the  one  presenting  a  large 
rich  bason,  the  other  a  suitable  laver,  replete  with  sweet  water,  wherewith  the 
ambassador  washed  ;  a  gentleman  sewer,  with  humble  reverence,  presenting  him 
a  fair  towel,  wherewith  he  dried  his  hands,  and  so  forthwith  returned  to  his  place. 

This  being  done,  the  bishop  ascended  to  the  pulpit,  where,  after  that  he  had  de- 
livered in  verse  a  certain  praise  and  commendation  of  the  prince,  then  he  convert- 
ed the  rest  of  his  Latin  oration  in  prose  to  the  ambassadors,  every  one  in  particu- 
lar, beginning  at  the  ambassador  of  England,  and  so  continuing  with  the  rest ; 
wherein  he  made  mention  of  the  chronology  of  each  of  these  princes,  and  recited 
the  proximity  and  nea-ness  of  blood  that  they  had  with  Scotland  :  Concluding  his 
oration  with  exhortation  and  thanksgiving  to  God  for  that  good  occasion  and  pros- 
perous assembly. 

In  conclusion,  the  blessing  being  given,  Lyon  King  at  Arms  cried  with  a  loud 
voice,  G(jd  save  Frederick  Henry,  and  Henry  Frederick,  by  the  grace  of  God,  Prince 
of  Scotland.  The  rest  of  the  heralds  proclaimed  the  same  at  an  open  window  of 
the  chapel-royal  with  sound  of  trumpet. 

Then  the  king,  the  prince,  the  ambassadors,  the  nobles,  and  ladies  of  honour, 
retired  forth  of  the  chapel  in  such  order  as  they  entered,  and  repaired  towards 
the  king's  hall.  During  their  passage,  the  cannons  of  the  Castle  roared,  that  there- 
with the  earth  trembled,  and  other  smaller  shot  made  their  harmony  after  their 
kind. 

In  the  king's  hall  the  Duke  of  Lennox  received  the  prince  from  the  ambassador 
of  England,  and  presented  him  to  the  King's  Majesty,  v^ho  addubbed  him  knight. 
He  was  touched  with  the  spur  by  the  Earl  of  Marr.  Thereafter,  the  King's  Ma- 
jesty presented  a  ducal  crown  on  his  head,  and  then  was  proclaimed  by  Lyon  King 
at  Arms,  The  PJght  F.xcellent,  High  and  Mngnanime  Frederick  Henry,  Henry  Frede- 
rick, by  the  grace  of  God,  Knight  and  Baron  of  Renfrew,  Lord  of  the  Isles,  Earl  of 
Carrick,  Duke  of  Rothsay,  Prince  and  Great  Steward  of  Scotland. 

These  words  were  repeated  by  the  heralds  with  a  loud  voice  at  an  open  window 
f)f  the  hall. 

Then  the  prince  was  carried  by  the  ambassador  of  England  to  his  own  chamber 
of  presence,  where  the  most  rich  and  rare  propines  were  there  presented. 

Also,  there  were  certain  barons  and  gentlemen  addubbed  knights,  whose  names 
do  follow  in  order  as  they  were  proclaimed.     And  first  their  oath. 


THE    OATH    OF    A    KNIGHT. 

I.  T  Shall  fortify  and  defend  the  true  Christian  Religion,  and  Christ's  holy  evan- 
_!_  gel,  now  presently  preached  within  this  realm,  to  the  utmost  of  my  power. 
"  2.  I  shall  be  loyal  and  true  to   my  sovereign  Lord  the  King's  Majesty,  to  all 
orders  of  chivalry,  and  to  the  noble  Office  of  Arms. 

"  3.  I  shall  fortify  and  defend  justice  at  my  power,  and  that  without  favour  or 
fead. 

"  4.  I  shall  never  flee  from  my  sovereign  Lord  the  King's   Majesty,  nor  from 
his  highness's  lieutenants  in  time  of  mellay  and  battle. 
"   5.  I  shall  defend  my  native  realm  from  all  alieners  and  strangers. 
"  6.  I  s  all  defend  the  just  action  and  quarrel  of  all  ladies  of  honour,  of  all  true 
and  friendless  widows,  of  orphans,  and  of  maidens  of  good  fame. 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  i57 

•■  7.  I  shall  do  diligence  wheresoever  I  hear  there  are  any  murderers,  traitors,  and 
"  masterful  reavers,  that  oppress  the  King's  lieges,  and  poor  people,  to  bring  them 
"  to  the  law  at  my  power. 

"  8.  I  shall  maintain  and  uphold  the  noble  estate  of  chivah-y,  with  horse,  har- 
"  ness,  and  other  knightly  abuhments,  and  shall  help  and  succour  them  of  tha 
"  same  order  at  my  power,  if  they  have  need. 

"  9.  I  shall  enquire  and  seek  to  have  the  knowledge  and  understanding  of  all 
"  the  articles  and  pomts  contained  m  the  book  of  chivalry. 

"  All  these  premisses  to  observe,  keep,  and  fidlil,  I  oblesse  me.  So  help  me, 
"  ray  God,  by  my  own  hand.     So  help  me  God,"  &-c. 

Sir  William  Stewart  of  Houston,  Knight. 

Sir  Robert  Bruce  of  Clackmanan,  Knight. 

Sir  John  Boswell  of  Balmuto,  Knight. 

Sir  John  Shaw  of  Sauchie,  Knight. 

Sir  John  Murray  of  Ethilston,  Knight. 

Sir  William  Monteith  of  Kerse,  Knight. 

Sir  Alexander  Eraser  of  Fraserburgh,  Knight. 

Sir  John  Lindsay  of  Dunrod,  Knight. 

Sir  George  Livingston  of  Ogilface,  Knight. 

Sir  James  Forrester  Torwoodhead,  Knight. 

Sir  Andrew  Balfour  of  Strathour,  Knight. 

Sir  Walter  Dundas  of  Over-NewUston,  Knight. 

Sir  John  Boswell  of  Glassmount,  Knight. 

Sir  George  Elphingston  of  Blythwood,  Knight. 

Sir  William  Livingston  of  Darnchester,  Knight. 

Sir  David  Meldrum  of  Newhall,  Knight. 

These  names  were  proclaimed  upon  the  terrace  of  the  fore  front  of  the  castle, 
with  sound  of  trumpets ;  and  great  quantity  of  divers  species  of  gold  and  money 
cast  over  amongst  the  people. 

These  things  being  accomplished,  the  king  and  queen's  majesties,  with  the 
ambassadors,  addressed  themselves  to  the  banquet  in  the  great  hall,  about  eight 
of  the  clock  at  night ;  then  came  Lyon  King  at  arms,  with  his  brethren  the 
heralds,  entered  the  hall  before  the  king  and  queen's  meat,  the  trumpets 
sounding  melodiously  before  them,  with  these  noblemen  bearing  office  for  the 
present. 

The  Earl  of  Marr,  Great  Master  Household. 
The  Lord  Fleming,  Great  Master  Usher. 

The  Earl  of  Montrose,  Carver     t 

The  Earl  of  Glencairn,  Cupper    >  for  the  King's  Majesty. 

The  Earl  of  Orkney,  Sewer         3 

The  Lord  Seaton,  Carver  T 

Tiie  Lord  Home,  Cupper  >  for  the  Queen's  Majesty. 

The  Lord  Sample,  Sewer  J 

This  dehcate  banquet  being  ordered  with  great  abundance,  the  king,  queen, 
and  ambassadors,  were  placed  all  at  one  table,  being  formed  of  three  parts,  after 
a  geometrical  figure,  in  such  sort  that  every  one  might  have  a  full  sight  of  tlie 
other. 

The  king  and  queen's  majesties  were  placed  in  the  midst  of  the  table,  and  on 
the  king's  right  hand  were  set  the  English  ambassadors,  the  Earl  of  Sussex  and 
Ml  Robert  Bowes.  Next  them  sat  the  ambassador  from  the  Duke  of  Brunswick, 
ar-r'   h  '  ambassador  from  the  Duke  of  Magdeburg. 

On  the  king's  left  hand,  next  to  the  queen's  majesty,  sat  the  ambassador  of 


i58  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

Denmark,  and  ambassadors  from  the  states  of  Holland  and  Zealand  :  betwixt  every 
one  of  their  seats  was  left  a  good  space. 

On  the  east  and  west  side  of  the  hall  were  placed  two  very  long  tables,  where 
were  set  certain  noblemen,  ladies  of  honour,  and  counsellors  of  Scotland,  and  with 
them  the  noblemen  and  gentlemen  of  England,  Denmark,  AUemagne,  and  Flanders. 
And  betwixt  every  nobleman  and  gentleman  stranger,  was  placed  a  lady  of  honour 
or  gentlewoman. 

Now,  being  thus  in  a  very  honourable  and  comely  order  set ;  and  after  a  while, 
having  well  refreshed  themselves  with  the  first  service,  which  was  very  sumptuous, 
there  came  into  tlie  sight  of  them  all  a  blackmoor,  drawing,  as  it  seemed  to  the 
beholders,  a  triumphal  chariot,  (and  before  it  the  melodious  noise  of  trumpets  and 
hautboys)  which  chariot  entered  the  hall.  The  motion  of  the  whole  frame, 
(which  was  twelve  feet  long  and  seven  feet  broad)  was  so  artificial  within  itself, 
that  it  appeared  to  be  drawn  in  only  by  the  strength  of  a  Moor,  who  was  very 
richly  attired  ;  his  traces  were  great  chains  of  pure  gold. 

Upon  this  chariot  was  finely  and  artifacially  devised  a  sumptuous  covered  table, 
decked  with  all  sorts  of  exquisite  delicates  and  dainties,  of  patisserie,  fruitages,  and 
confections. 

About  the  table  were  placed  six  gallant  dames,  who  represented  a  silent  comedy ; 
three  of  them  clothed  in  argentme  satin,  and  three  in  crimson  satin  :  All  these  six 
garments  were  enriched  with  togue  and  tinsel  of  pure  gold  and  silver,  every  one  of 
them  having  a  crown  or  garland  on  their  heads,  very  richly  decked  with  feathers, 
pearls,  and  jewels,  upon  their  loose  hair,  in  antica  forma. 

In  the  first  front  stood  dame  Ceres,  with  a  sickle  in  her  right  hand,  and  a  hand- 
ful of  corn  in  the  other,  and  upon  the  outermost  part  of  her  thigh  was  written 
this  sentence,  Fundent  uberes  omnia  campi,  which  is  to  say,  the  plenteous  fields  shall 
afford  all  thmgs. 

Over  against  Ceres  stood  Fecundity,  with  some  bushes  of  chesbols,  which,  un- 
der an  hieroglyphic  sense,  representeth  broodings,  with  this  device,  Fcelix  prole 
diviim,  and  on  the  other  side  of  her  habit,  Crescant  in  mille.  The  first  importing 
that  this  country  is  blessed  by  the  child  of  the  goddess,  and  the  second  alluding 
to  the  king  and  queen's  majesties,  that  their  generations  may  grov/  into  thou- 
sands. 

Next,  on  the  other  side,  was  placed  Faith,  having  in  her  hands  a  bason,  and  in 
the  same  two  hands  joined  together,  with  this  sentence,  Boni  alumna  conjugii.  The 
fortress  and  nurse  of  a  blessed  marriage. 

Over  against  Faith  stood  Concord,  with  a  golden  tasse  in  her  left  hand,  and  the 
horn  of  abundance  in  her  right  hand,  with  this  sentence.  Plena  heant  te  numina  sinir. 
The  heavenly  powers  do  bless  thee  with  a  full  bosom. 

The  next  place  was  occupied  by  Liberality,  who  having  in  her  right  hand  two 
crowns,  and  in  her  left  two  sceptres,  with  this  device.  Me  comite plura  quam  dabis 
ficcipies ;  that  is  to  say.  Having  me  thy  follower  thou  shalt  receive  more  than 
thou  shalt  give. 

And  the  last  was  Perseverance,  having  in  her  right  hand  a  staft',  and  on  her  left 
shoulder  an  anchor,  with  this  device.  Nee  diibiiv  res  mutabunt,  nee  secundce,  Neither 
doubtful  nor  more  prosperous  things  sl^  change  your  state. 

This  chariot,  which  should  have  been  drawn  in  by  a  hon,  (but  because  his  pre- 
sence might  have  brought  some  fear  to  the  nearest,  or  that  the  sight  of  the  hghts 
aiid  torches  might  have  commoved  his  tameness)  it  was  thought  meet  that  the 
Moor  should  supply  that  room  :  and  so  he  in  outward  show  pressed  to  draw  that 
forward,  which,  by  a  secret  convoy,  was  brought  to  the  prince's  table  ;  and  the 
w'hole  desert  was  delivered  by  Ceres,  Fecundity,  Faith,  Concord,  Liberality,  and 
Perseverance,  to  the  earls,  lords,  and  barons,  that  were  sewers. 

Presently  after  the  retouring  of  the  chariot,  entered  a  most  sumptuous,  artificial, 
and  well-proportioned  ship  ;  the  length  of  her  keel  was  eighteen  feet,  and  her 
breadth  eight  feet.  From  her  bottom  to  her  highest  flag  was  forty  feet :  the  sea 
she  stood  upon  was  twenty-four  feet  long,  with  breadth  convenient.  Her  motion 
was  so  artificially  devised  within  herself  that  none  could  perceive  what  brought 
her  in.  The  sea  under  her  was  lively  counterfeit  with  all  colours  :  On  her  fore 
stern  was  placed  Neptunus,  having  in  his  hand  his  trident,  and  on  his  head  a  crown. 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  i^ij 

His  apparel  was  all  of  India  cloth  of  silver  and  silk,  which  bare  this  inscription, 
jfunxi  atque  reduxi,  which  in  sense  importeth.  That  as  he  joined  them  so  he  reduced 
their  majesties. 

Then  Thetis,  with  her  mace,  goddess  of  the  sea,  with  this  device,  Nunquam 
abero,  W  tutum  semper  te  litiore  sistam,  which  signifieth.  That  by  her  presence  she 
shall  always  be  careful  to  bring  tliem  into  a  safe  shore  and  harbour. 

The  Triton,  with  his  wilk  trumpet,  was  next  to  her,  with  this  device,  Velis,  ventis, 
votis.  By  sails,  by  vows,  by  winds. 

Round  about  the  ship  were  all  the  marine  people,  as  sirens,  (above  the  middle 
as  women,  and  under  as  fishes)  and  these  were  Parthenope,  Ligea,  and  Leucosia, 
who,  accommodating  their  gestures  to  the  voice  of  the  musicians,  repeated  this 
verse,  Unus  eris  nobis  cantandus  semper  in  orbe.  And  all  the  same  was  decored 
with  the  riches  of  the  seas,  as  pearls,  corals,  shells,  and  metals,  very  rare  and 
excellent. 

The  bulk  of  this  ship  was  curiously  painted  ;  and  her  galleries,  whereupon  stood 
the  most  part  of  the  banquet  in  crystalline  glass,  gilt  with  gold  and  azure.  Her 
masts  were  red ;  her  tackling,  and  cordage  were  silk,  of  the  same  colour,  with 
golden  pullies.  Her  ordnance  was  thirty-six  pieces  of  brass,  bravely  mounted ; 
and  her  anchors  silver  gilt.  And  all  her  sails  were  double  of  white  tafiety  ;  and 
in  her  foresail  a  ship-compass,  regarding  the  north  star,  with  this  sentence,  ^las- 
cunque  per  undas  ;  which  is  to  say.  Through  whatsoever  seas,  or  waves,  the  king's 
majesty  intendeth  his  course,  and  project  of  any  arising  action,  Neptune,  as  god 
of  the  sea,  shall  be  favourable  to  his  proceedings. 

On  the  main-sail  was  painted  the  armories  of  Scotland  and  Denmark,  with  this 
device,  competent  in  the  person  of  the  Prince  of  Scotland,  En  qua  divisa  beata 
efficiunt,  collecta  tenes  :  that  is  to  say,  "  Behold,  (O  Prince)  what  doth  make  these 
"  kingdoms  severally  blessed,  jointly  (O  Prince  of  Hope)  thou  boldest  and  hast 
"  together." 

Her  tops  were  all  armed  with  taffeties  of  his  majesty's  colours,  gold  and  jewels, 
and  all  her  flags  and  streamers  suitable  to  tlie  same. 

Her  mariners  were  in  number  six,  apparelled  all  in  changeable  Spanish  taffeties, 
and  her  pilot  in  cloth  of  gold  ;  he  alone  stood  at  the  helm,  who  only  moved  and 
governed  the  whole  frame,  both  the  ship  and  her  burden,  very  artificially. 

The  musicians  within  the  same  were  fourteen,  all  apparelled  in  taffeties  of  his 
majesty's  colours,  besides  Arion  with  his  harp. 

Being  thus  prepared,  at  the  sound  of  trumpets  she  approached,  and  at  the  next 
sound  of  Triton's  wilk  trumpet,  together  with  the  master's  whistle,  she  made  sail  till 
she  came  to  the  table,  discharging  the  ordnance  in  her  stern  by  the  way  ;  but  because 
this  device  carried  some  moral  meaning  with  it,  it  shall  not  be  impertinent  to  this 
purpose  to  discover  what  is  meant  and  propined  thereby. 

The  king's  majesty  having  undertaken  in  such  a  desperate  time  to  sail  to  Nor- 
way, and,  like  a  new  Jason,  to  bring  his  queen,  our  gracious  lady,  to  this  king- 
dom, being  detained  and  stopped  by  the  conspiracies  of  witches  and  such  devilish 
dragons,  thought  it  very  meet  to  follow  forth  this  his  own  invention  ;  that  as 
Neptuniis  (speaking  poetically,  and  by  ^ch  fictions  as  the  like  interludes  and 
actions  are  accustomed  to  be  decored  witlffl)  joined  the  king  to  the  queen ;, 

So,  after  this  conjunction,  he  brought  their  majesties  as  happily  hither  ;  and 
now,  at  this  her  blessed  delivery,  did  bring  such  things  as  the  sea  aftbrds,  to  decorc- 
this  festival  time  withal,  which  immediately  were  delivered  to  the  sewers,  forth  of 
the  galleries  of  this  ship,  out  of  crystalline  glass,  very  curiously  painted  with  gold 
and  azure,  all  sorts  of  fishes,  as  herrings,  whitings,  flucks,  oysters,  buckies,  lam- 
preys, partans,  lobsters,  crabs,  spout-fish,  clams  ;  with  other  infinite  things  made 
of  sugar,  and  most  lively  represented  in  their  own  shape.  And  whilst  the  ship 
was  unloading,  Arion,  sitting  upon  the  galley-nose,  which  resembled  the  form  of  a 
dolphin  fish,  played  upon  his  harp  ;  then  began  her  music,  in  green  holly  haut- 
boys, in  fine  parts.  After  that  followed  viols,  with  voices  in  plain  counterpoint 
to  the  nature  ot  these  hexameter  verses. 

Vol.  IL  3  Y. 


i6o  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

Undique  conveniant,  quot  reges  nomine  Christi 
Gaudent,  hucque  suas  maturent  cogere  vires  ; 
Viribus  hos,  O  Rex,  opibu'^que  anteiveris  oranes, 
Ouisque  suam  jam  posse  velit  tibi  cedere  sorlera, 
Regna,  viros,  aurum,  quae  te  feceie  potentem 
Omnia  conjugii  decorant  haec  pignora  chari : 
Anna,  precor  foelix  multos  foeliciter  annos, 
Vive,  resume  novos,  atque  annuus  anni 
Instar  eat,  redeatque  novo  tibi  partus  ab  ortu. 
Cresce,  puer,  sacri  mens  numinis  imbibat  imbres. 
Semper  uterque  parens  de  te  nova  gaudia  captet. 
Scotia,  quae  quondam  multis  tcnebrosa  vocata  est, 
Lumina  magna  nitent  in  te  superantia  ccelum. 
Lux  verbi,  &  rex,  &  princeps,  diademata  regni. 

Aftc  iiich  ensued  a  still  noise  of  recorders  and  flutes ;  and,  for  the  fourth,  a 
general  concert  of  the  best  instruments. 

So  this  interlude  drawing  near  to  an  end,  in  the  very  last  courses  was  discovered 
this  sentence  likewise,  Subinissiu  adorat  oceanus ;  inferring,  that  the  ocean  sea,  by 
oifenng  the  shapes  of  her  treasure,  hurnbly  adored  and  honoured  the  sitters.  And 
when,  in  this  time,  all  the  banquet  was  done,  after  thanks  being  given,  there  was 
sung  with  most  delicate  dulce  voices,  and  sweet  harmony,  in  seven  parts,  the 
cxxviii.  psalm,  with  fourteen  voices.  And  that  being  done,  at  the  sound  of  Tri- 
ton's wilk  trumpet  and  the  pilot's  whistle,  she  weighed  anchor,  made  sail,  and,  with 
noise  of  hautboys  and  trumpets,  retired,  and  then  discharged  the  rest  of  her  ord- 
nance to  the  great  admiration  of  the  beholders, 

After  all  which  pastime  and  sporr,  with  merry  and  joyful  repast,  the  king  and 
queen's  majesties,  after  their  offices  of  honour  and  respect,  place  being  prepared  for 
the  revels,  and  the  persons  appointed  for  the  same  discharging  themselves  suffi- 
ciently, their  majesties  and  ambassadors  went  to  another  hall,  most  richly  and 
magnificently  hung  with  rich  tapestry,  where,  for  the  collation,  a  most  rare,  sump- 
tuous, and  prince-like  desert  was  prepared.  Which  being  ended,  after  taking 
leave  and  good-nights,  they  departed  about  three  of  the  clock  in  the  morning,  to 
their  night's  rest. 

The  days  ensuing,  so  long  as  leisure  might  serve,  were  bestowed  by  the  ambassa- 
dors in  banqueting  of  noblemen  and  gentlemen  of  their  acquaintance  ;  and  the 
king  in  the  mean  time  was  solicitous  and  careful  of  honourable  and  magnific  re- 
wards to  be  bestowed  on  either  of  them,  which  was  also  prmcely  performed,  to 
their  great  contentments. 

And  as  they  were  come  to  Edinburgh,  they  were  all  banqueted,  at  some  time 
severally,  and  at  other  time  together,  by  divers  noblemen  of  Scotland,  with  great 
honour.  Last  of  all,  one  ambassador  banqueted  another,  for  commemoration  of 
that  joyful  meeting  and  good  success. 

Then  the  king  and  queen's  majesties  came  to  Edinburgh,  where  they  were  in- 
vited by  the  ambassadors  of  Denmark  unto  a  banquet  within  their  ship,  which 
lay  at  anchor  in  the  river  of  Forth  :  she  was  so  great  that  she  could  not  enter  the 
harbour.  ^ 

Tiie  banquet  was  very  sumptuous,  and  the  ambassadors,  so  joyous  of  their  final 
dispatch,  behaved  themselves  to  their  majesties  in  a  kindly  manner,  according 
to  the  ordinary  custom  of  their  country,  by  propining  of  drink  unto  them  in 
the  name  of  their  princes,  which  was  lovingly  accepted  and  requitted:  In  com- 
memoiation  whereof,  the  whole  artillery  of  that  great  vessel  were  shot  in  great 
number. 

The  three  great  ships  of  the  Estates,  lying  in  the  same  road  near  by,  made  cor- 
respondence and  resonance  to  the  number  of  six  score  great  shot.  And  thus  con- 
cluded their  bein  ale. 

Then  the  castle  of  Edinburgh,  for  performance  of  the  king's  honour,  as  they 
perceived  the  ships  to  loose  and  to  hoist  up  sail,  saluted  every  ship,  as  they  showed 
themselves  in  readiness  by  order,  with  a  number  of  great  cannon  shot. 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTSv 


ACT  BY  HIS  ROYAL  HIGHNESS  HIS  MAJESTY  S  HIGH  COMMISSIONER,  AND  LORDS  OF  PRIVY 
COUNCIL,  ESTABLISHING  THE  ORDER  OF  THE  RIDING  OF  THE  PARLIAMENT  AT  EDIN- 
BURGH, JULY  25TH  1 68 1. 

I.  His  Majesty's  High  Commissioner  and  Lords  of  Privy  Council  ordain  the 
magistrates  of  Edinburgh,  to  cause  make  a  lane  of  their  citizens,  in  arms  and 
best  order,  from  the  Lady's  Steps  to  the  Nether-Bow,  (his  majesty's  foot-guards 
making  the  lane  from  the  Nether-Bow  to  the  palace}. 

IL  The  said  magistrates  are  appointed  to  order  that  there  be  no  shooting,  nor 
any  displaying  of  ensigns,  nor  beating  of  drums,  during  the  cavalcade,  nor  any 
coaches  to  be  seen  within  the  ports  of  Edinburgh  till  the  whole  solemnity  be  over, 
under  all  highest  pains.  The  magistrates  are  to  cause  make  and  place  two  banks 
of  timber  within  the  Abbey-close,  for  mounting  on  horseback,  and  two  at  the 
Lady's  Steps,  for  mounting  upon  horseback  and  dismounting. 

in.  The  Constable  and  Marischal  Guards  of  Partisans  are  to  make  a  lane  from 
the  Lady's  Steps,  those  of  the  Constable's  without,  and  those  of  the  Marischal'* 
within  the  house,  allowing  the  Constable  sis  of  his  guard  within  doors,  conform  to 
the  former  practice. 

IV.  Every  member  of  Parliament  must  ride,  and  the  absents  incur  fining,  con- 
form to  the  act  of  Parliament  1662. 

V.  Where  there  be  double  elections  of  commissioners  neither  are  to  ride. 

VI.  The  nobility  are  to  ride  in  their  robes,  and  with  foot-mantles. 

VII.  The  officers  ot  state,  who  are  not  noblemen,  and  who  have  gowns  particu- 
lar to  their  office,  are  to  ride  in  these  gowns. 

VIII.  The  whole  members  are  to  ride  covered,  excepting  those  who  carry  the 
honours. 

IX.  The  Lyon  Heralds,  Pursuivants,  and  Trumpets,  ride  immediately  before 
the  honours  ;  the  Lyon  in  his  coat  and  robe,  chain  and  batton,  alone  ;  and  imme- 
diately before  the  sword,  the  rest,  with  their  coats,  foot-mantles,  bareheaded,  in 
their  accustomed  order. 

X.  The  two  Macers  of  Council  and  four  Macers  of  Session  ride  on  each  side  of 
the  honours  bareheaded,  with  foot-mantles ;  the  two  Macers  of  Council  attending 
the  crown,  and  the  four  Macers  of  Session  the  sceptre  and  sword. 

XI.  The  higher  degree  and  most  honourable  of  that  degree  is  to  ride  always 
last. 

XII.  Every  duke  is  to  have  eight  lacquies,  every  marquis  six,  every  earl  four, 
every  viscount  three,  every  lord  three,  every  commissioner  for  a  shire  two,  antl 
every  commissioner  for  burghs  one  ;  and  every  nobleman  is  to  have  a  gentleman 
bareheaded  to  walk  by  him,  and  to  bear  up  his  train,  and  these  gentlemen  are  at 
their  entry  to  the  house  to  stand  without  the  bar. 

XIII.  The  archbishops  and  bishops  are  to  ride  in  their  gowns  and  tippets,  with 
their  foot-mantles,  and  the  archbishops  may  have  eight  lacquies,  and  bishops  three, 
and  each  of  them  is  to  have  a  gentleman  bareheaded  to  walk  by  him,  and  to  beai' 
up  his  train. 

XIV.  The  noblemen's  lacquies  may  have  over  their  liveries  velvet  coats  with 
their  badges,  i.  e.  their  crests  and  mottos  done  on  plate,  or  embroidered  upon  the 
back  and  breast,  conform  to  ancient  custom,  or  their  ordinary  liveries. 

XV.  The  Constable  and  Marischal  are  in  the  morning  to  wait  on  his  Majesty's 
High  Commissioner  at  the  palace,  and  to  receive  his  orders,  and  from  thence,  re- 
turning privately,  the  Constable  is  to  come  out  of  his  lodging  on  foot,  and,  having 
viewed  the  rooms  under  and  above  the  Parliament  House,  puts  on  his  robes,  and, 
having  his  batton  in  his  hand,  sets  himself  in  a  chair  at  the  entry  of  the  close  at 
the  Lady's  Steps,  by  the  outmost  of  his  guards,  from  which  he  is  to  rise  and  salute 
the  members  as  they  light  from  their  horses,  and  to  recommend  them  to  the  gen- 
tlemen of  his  guard  to  be  conducted  to  the  Marischal  Guards. 

XVI.  The  Marischal  is  also  to  attend  in  his  robes,  being  set  in  a  chair  at  the 
head  of  his  guards,  and  to  receive  the  members  (having  his  batton  in  his  hand)  a-; 
they  enter  the  doors. 


ioz  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

XVII.  The  Officers  of  State  who  are  noblemen,  so  many  of  them  as  are  in  the 
kingdom,  are  to  ride  up  from  the  Abbey  in  their  robes  about  halt  an  hour  before 
the  cavalcade,  and  to  wait  in  the  Parliament  House  until  the  High  Commissioner 
come;  and  when  an  ordinary  subject  is  Commissioner,  the  High  Chancellor  is  to 
take  his  own  purse  in  his  hand,  and  to  usher  him  betwixt  the  bar  and  the  throne; 
but  when  his  Royal  Highness,  or  any  lawful  brother  or  son  of  the  king  is  commis- 
sioner, he  is  to  usher  them  from  the  door  itself  and  back, 

XVIII.  The  whole  Members  of  Parliament  are  to  wait  upon  his  Majesty's  High 
Commissioner  in  the  Guard-hall,  the  nobility  being  in  their  robes,  and  the  servants 
and  horses  are  to  attend  in  the  outer  close. 

XIX.  The  Lyon  King  at  Arms  in  his  coat,  robe,  chain,  and  batten,  (to  whose 
charge  the  order  of  riding  is  committed^  with  six  heralds,  six  pursuivants,  and  six 
trumpets,  in  their  coats,  attend  likewise. 

XX.  How  soon  his  Majesty's  High  Commissioner  is  ready,  the  Lord  Register 
(or  such  as  he  shall  appoint)  and  Lyon  standing  together,  each  of  them  having  a 
roll  in  his  hand,  and  the  rolls  being  read,  the  Lyon  is  to  call  the  names  of  such  of 
them  as  are  to  nde,  according  to  their  order;  and  one  herald  is  to  cry  aloud  at 
one  of  the  windows,  and  another  herald  is  to  stand  at  the  gate,  and  see  them  do 
accordingly. 

XXI.  The  Members  are  to  ride  two  and  two,  each  degree  by  itself,  at  some  dis- 
tance, without  mixing  with  any  other  degree;  so  tnat  if  there  fall  to  be  an  odd 
member  of  one  degree,  he  must  ride  alone. 

XXII.  The  Lord  Register  is  to  make  up  the  rolls  of  Parliament,  both  for  the 
riding  and  calling  in  the  Parliament  House,  conform  to  the  rolls  of  riding  and 
calling  at  the  last  Parhament,  anno  1669,  whereof  he  is  to  give  the  Lyon  a 
just  duplicate,  except  where  there  is  just  ground  to  alter  the  same,  and  the  mem- 
bers are  to  ride  as  they  are  called;  but  if  they  think  themselves  prejudged,  they 
may  protest  in  the  same  manner  as  at  the  calhng  of  the  rolls  in  the  house, 
and  may  afterwards,  as  they  think  fit,  apply  themselves  to  the  Parliament  for 
remedy. 

XXIII.  The  honours  are  to  be  carried  immediately  before  the  High  Commis- 
sioner ;  the  crown  by  the  Marquis  of  Douglas,  the  sceptre  next  it  by  the  eldest 
earl  present,  and  the  sword  before  it  by  the  earl  next  in  order,  and  the  bearers  are 
to  nde,  one  by  one,  bareheaded. 

XXIV.  The  dukes  and  marquisses  are  to  ride  after  the  High  Commissioner  at 
some  distance,  conform  to  the  former  custom. 

XXV.  The  Master  of  Horses  is  to  ride  bareheaded  after  his  Majesty's  High 
Commissioner,  but  a  little  aside,  when  the  Commissioner  is  the  king's  lawful  son 
or  brother. 

XXVI.  The  Gentleman-Usher,  with  a  white  rod  in  his  hand,  is  to  ride  aside 
bareheaded  near  to  the  Commissioner,  he  before  on  the  same  side,  and  in  the  same 
manner  as  the  Master  of  Horse  behind  in  the  case  foresaid. 

XXVII.  How  soon  his  Majesty's  High  Commissioner  ahghts  from  his  horse,  the 
Lord  Constable  is  to  receive  him,  and  to  attend  him  to  the  Marischal  Guards,  and 
then  both  Constable  and  Marischal  are  to  convey  him  bareheaded  to  the  throne, 
and  are  in  the  same  manner  to  attend  him  in  his  return  to  his  horse. 

XXVIII.  The  return  to  the  palace  is  to  be  in  the  same  manner,  with  these  two 
alterations,  viz.  First,  The  Constable  and  Marischal  ride  on  the  High  Commission- 
er's left  and  right  hand  with  caps  of  permission,  the  Constable  on  the  right,  and 
the  Marischal  on  the  left.  Secondly,  The  officers  of  state,  who  are  noblemen,  are 
not  to  take  horse  until  the  High  Commissioner  be  gone,  and  then  are  to  ride  at 
some  distance  after  the  guard. 


AN  ACCOUNT  OF  THE  FORM  OF  THE  CREATION  OF  THE   BIARQtHS  OF  HAMILTON,  AND. 
MARQUIS  OFHUNTLY,   IJth  jlpril  I599. 

In  his  Majesty's  great  chamber  in  the  Abbey  of  Holyroodhouse, where  the  like 
ceremony  was  wont  to  be  done,  being  richly  hung  with  tapestry,  five  stages  or  de- 
grees of  timber  were  erected,  one  for  his  majesty  on  the  west  side,  whereon  his 
3 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


'(>3 


majesty's  chair  of  state  was  set  under  the  pall  of  honour,  one  for  the  duke,  one  for 
the  earls,  one  for  the  lords,  and  one  for  the  knights;  there  was  also  before  the 
throne  a  table  covered  with  a  cloth  of  gold,  whereon  were  laid  the  sword,  sceptre, 
and  crown,  the  noblemen  attending  the  ceremonies  in  their  respective  seats  in  their 
robes;  and  his  majesty  in  his  robe-royal,  being  placed  in  his  chair,  the  queen 
sitting  by,  the  Lyon  King  at  Arms,  and  Master  of  Ceremonies,  with  the  heralds 
and  pursuivants  in  their  coats,  and  trumpets  sounding,  brought  in  before  his  ma- 
jesty these  two  noblemen,  viz.  the  Earls  of  Arran  and  Huntly,  the  first  conveyed 
"by  the  Duke  of  Lennox  and  Earl  of  Marr,  the  second  by  the  Chancellor  and 
Earl  of  Caithness.  Thereafter  the  Lyon  asked  his  Majesty,  If  his  Majesty  would 
be  pleased  to  promote  these  noblemen  to  further  honours?  his  Majesty  answered. 
Yes:  Then  the  Lyon,  Master  of  Ceremonies,  with  heralds,  pursuivants,  and  trum- 
pets, conveyed  them  into  the  Green  Council  Chamber,  where  they  were  divested 
of  their  comital  robes,  and  vested  in  the  habit  of  a  marquis,  and  so  were  again 
conveyed  to  his  Majesty's  presence  thus: 

The  ordinary  macers  that  attend  the  Chancellor  and  Session  making  place. 

Master  of  Ceremonies. 

Trumpets  sounding  with  the  noblemen's  colours  at  their  trumpets. 

Pursuivants  in  their  coats. 

Heralds  in  their  coats. 

Four  gentlemen,  for  each  of  the  persons  to  be  created,  bearing  their  honours, 
viz.  for  my  Lord  Arran,  Robert  Hamilton  of  Goslington  the  pennon,  Alexander 
Hamilton  of  Fenton  the  banner,  Claud  Hamilton  of  Shawfield  the  marquis's 
crown,  John  Campbell  of  Ardkinlass  the  patent ;  for  my  Lord  Huntly,  John  Ogil- 
vie  of  the  Craig  the  pennon,  John  Crichton  of  Frendraught  the  banner,  Mark  Ker 
of  Ormiston  the  crown,  Alexander  Gordon  of  Strathdon  the  patent. 

Lyon  King  at  Arms. 

The  two  earls  conveyed  by  the  fore-named  noblemen  in  their  respective  robes 
and  crowns  on  their  heads. 

Coming  before  the  king,  they  made  their  reverence ;  then  they  were  led  up  by 
the  Master  of  Ceremonies  some  steps,  and,  sitting  down  on  their  knees  on  velvet 
cushions,  the  Lyon  made  a  harangue,  both  to  his  Majesty  and  to  them,  declaring 
to  the  noblemen,  to  promote  them  to  that  dignity,  and  that  he  desired  them  to 
fear  God,  and  obey  his  power;  then  he  took  cheir  oaths.  That  they  should  obey 
God,  his  Majesty,  and  maintain  the  religion  then  professed.  Thereafter  the  Lyon 
delivered  to  his  Majesty  the  patents,  and  his  Majesty  re-delivered  them  to  the 
Lyon,  who  gave  them  to  the  noblemen,  in  token  that  they  should  obey  God  and 
hi-  Majesty's  laws.  After,  the  Lyon  delivered  to  his  Majesty  the  marquisses'  co- 
ronets, his  Majesty  re-delivered  them  to  the  Lyon,  the  Lyon  put  the  crowns  on 
their  heads,  saying,  Jrjhn  Marquis  of  Hamilton,  Earl  of  Arran,  Lord  Aven,  &.c. 
George  Marquis  of  Huntly,  Earl  of  Enzie,  Lord  Gordon  of  Badenoch,  &.c.  The  same 
was  proclaimed  forth  of  the  windows,  by  the  heralds  and  pursuivants,  with  sound 
of  trumpets;  then  were  they  conveyed  to  their  seats,  and  placed  above  the  earls, 
upon  the  king's  left  hand,  trumpets  sounding. 

The  Lyon  desired  his  Majesty  to  honour  the  gentlemen,  who  bore  the  honours, 
with  the  honour  of  knighthood;  his  Majesty  consented:  The  Lyon  caused  them 
to  sit  down  on  their  knees  at  the  foot  of  all  the  stage;  and  after  he  had  made  an 
exhortation  to  them,  and  received  all  their  oaths,  they  holding  up  their  hands, 
and  promising  to  obey  all   the   injunctions,  the  Lyon   presented   the  sword  to  his 

Majesty,  who  struck  each  of  them  therewith  on  the  right  shoulder,  and  Sir 

offered  the  spur,   the   Lyon  first  proclaiming  their  stiles,  and  after  the 

heralds  and  pursuivants  at  the  windows  with  sound  of  trumpet. 

I  find  this  difference  in  the  creation  of  many  earls,  from  what  is  here  set  down, 
that  the  four  gentlemen  bear  the  honours  thus;  the  first  the  pennon,  the  second 
the  standard,  the  third  the  sword  and  belt,  the  fourth  the  crown;  and,  lastly, 
the  Lyon  bears  the  patent  in  a  velvet  bag ;  and  that  the  Lyon  oifered  first  to 
his  Majesty  the  sword  and  belt,  and,  receiving  it  back,  put  it  on  the  person  no- 
bihtate. 

As  also,  when  the  king  was  not  present,  and  after  his  going  to  England,  the 
ceremony  was  performed  by  his  Majesty's  High  Commissioner,  if  there  was  one  at 

Vol.  U.  3  Z  ' 


i64  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

the  time,  or  otherwise  a  writ  was  directed  to  the  Lord  Chancellor,  appointing  him 
Commissioner  tor  that  creation;  and  then  the  first  thing  that  was  done,  after  the 
person  to  be  created  was  brought  in,  tlie  Lyon  gave  the  patent  to  the  Commission- 
er, who  gave  it  to  the  Register  or  Clerk  of  Council  to  be  read.  And  I  observe 
this  in  all  our  old  creations,  that  if  the  person  to  be  dignified  was  a  lord  formerly, 
he  was  to  be  conveyed  in  by  two  lords;  and  the  ceremony  of  the  new  creation  be- 
ing over,  was  conveyed  to  his  place  by  two  of  that  degree  to  which  he  was  ad- 
vanced. The  English  nobility  are  sometimes  created  by  being  called  by  writ  to 
Parliament,  under  the  designations  of  earls,  viscounts,  &-c.  which  way  is  unknown 
to  us  m  Scotland,  though  the  king  may  introduce  it  at  his  pleasure. 


FORM  OF  THE  KING  S  OATH  TO  HIS  THREE  ESTATES. 

I  SHALL  be  leille  and  treu  to  God  and  halie  kirk,  and  to  the  thre  estaitts  of  my 
realme,  and  ilk  estaite  keipe,  govrane  and  defend  in  their  awen  fredome  and  pri- 
viledge  at  my  goodlie  powre,  after  the  lawes  and  custumes  of  the  realme:  The 
law,  custume  and  statuts  of  the  realme,  nether  to  eike  nor  mynishe  without  the 
consent  of  the  thre  estaits:  And  nathing  to  wyrke,  na  uses  tuoching  the  common 
profitt  of  the  realm,  but  consent  of  the  thre  estaitts,  the  law  and  statuts  made  be 
my  forbears,  keipe  and  use  at  all  points,  with  all  my  poure,  till  all  my  leiges  in  all 
thinges,  swa  that  they  repung  nought  aganis  the  faith.  Swa  helpe  me  God,  and 
this  haly  doume. 


FORM  OF  THE  FIDELITY  OF  THE  PRELATES  TO  THE  KING. 

I  SALL  be  leille  and  treu  to  you  my  Leige  Lord  Schire  James  King  of  Scots, 
and  not  heir  your  skaith,  nor  see  it,  but  I  sail  let  it  at  all  my  power,  and  warn  you 
thereof:  Your  counsaill  heile  that  you  shaw  me,  the  best  counsaile  I  can  to  give 
you  when  ze  charge  me.     In  verba  Dei,  and  als  help  me  God,  and  holy  evangells. 


FORM  OF  THE  BARON  S  OATH  TO  THE  KING. 

I  BECOME  your  man,  as  my  leige  king,  in  land,  life,  lithe  and  lime,  and  warld's 
honoure,  feute  and  laute,  agains  all  yat  live  and  dee  may.  Your  counsaille  celand 
yat  ze  shaw  to  me,  the  best  counsale  gifand  if  ze  charge  me;  your  skaith  na  dis- 
honoure  to  heir  nor  see,  but  I  sail  lett  it  at  all  my  goodie  powres,  and  warn  you 
thereof.     Sa  helpe  me  God. 


CHAP.     XVI. 

OF  THE  OFFICE  OF  HERALDS. 

HERALDS  took  their  rise  in  the  world  so  soon  as  kings  and  princes  dis- 
tinguished their  subjects  into  nobles  and  yeomen. 

They  are  called  heralds,  to  teach  us  what  they  were,  and  what  they  ought  yet 
to  be;  the  word  being  composed  of  two  Teutonic  words,  heir  and  mild,  which  sig- 
nifies an  old  lord,  or  ancient  sir,  showing,  that  they  ought  to  be  gentlemen  of  good 
descent,  for  such  were  officers  of  arms  in  old  times.  Some  derive  the  name  from 
heroes,  which  signifies  demi-gods,  from  whence  it  is  likely  the  French  word  herault 
is  derived. 

The  heavenly  heralds  are  angels,  the  messengers  of  the  Most  High  God,  Creator 
of  heaven  and  earth. 

Heralds,  not  many  years  ago,  have  been  allowed  very  high  privileges;  they  were 
allowed  free  entrance  into  the  courts  of  all  princes  and  great  lords;  they  had 
pov.sr  to  reprove  the  vices  of  noblemen,  knights,  and  esquires;  and  if  they  did 
npt  amend,  to  expel  them  from  all  honourable  meetings  and  martial  exercises.    It 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  165 

belonged  to  heralds  to  advertise  knights,  esquires,  and  military  commanders,  of  the 
day  of  battle,  to  attend  their  sovereign's  great  standard  in  their  best  ornaments ; 
they  were,  during  the  time  of  the  battle,  to  retire  to  an  eminence  to  witness  what 
was  done  on  either  side,  and  report  to  the  king  or  the  general,  those  who  behaved  most 
valiantly,  and  to  set  the  same  down  in  writing,  that  the  memory  thereof  might  re- 
main to  posterity.  When  the  battle  was  ended,  it  was  their  province  to  number 
the  dead,  to  exchange  prisoners  of  war,  and  commune  about  their  ransom;  to 
summon  rebellious  cities;  and,  in  case  of  composition,  to  march  before  the  captain 
or  governor  for  assurance  of  his  person.  At  jousts,  tournaments,  or  combats,  it 
was  the  otficeofthe  herald  to  lay  out  the  tieldof  battle,  and  to  divide  the  same  equally 
to  the  combatants.  Such  as  did  wrong  them  were  obliged  to  give  full  satisfac- 
tion, else  they  were  declared  guilty  of  high  treason,  and  degraded  of  nobihty ;  an 
instance  of  which  happened  duruig  the  minority  of  King  James  V.  in  the  year  of 
God  1515,  the  Duke  of  Albany  regent,  when  the  Lord  Drummond  was  solemnly 
forfeited  in  Parliament:  "  Eo  quod  leonem  armorum  regem  pugno  violasset,  dum 
"  eum  de  ineptiis  suis  admonet,"  says  the  record ;  and  it  was  upon  that  lord's 
humble  submission,  and  at  the  earnest  entreaty  of  the  Lyon,  that  he  was  restored. 

We  shall  here  insert  an  abstract  of  the  privileges  granted  in  ancient  times  to 
heralds,  ascribed  by  some  to  Alexander  the  Great,  by  others  to  the  King  and  Em- 
peror Charlemagne,  "  My  soldiers,  ye  are  and  shall  be  called  heralds,  companions 
"  for  kings,  and  judges  of  crimes  committed  by  noblemen,  and  arbiters  of  their 
"  quarrels  and  differences ;  ye  must  live  hereafter  exempt  from  going  any  more 
"  to  war  or  military  factions ;  counsel  kings  for  the  best,  the  benefit  of  the  com- 
"  monwealth,  and  for  their  honour  and  royal  dignity.  Correct  all  matters  vile 
"  and  dishonest,  favour  widows,  succour  orphans,  and  defend  them  from  all  vio- 
"  lence,  assist  witii  your  counsel  such  princes  and  lords  in  whose  courts  ye  shall 
"  abide  ;  and  freely  and  without  fear  demand  of  them  whatsoever  is  needful  for 
*'  you,  as  food,  raiment,  and  defrayings.  If  any  one  of  them  shall  deny  you, 
*'  let  them  be  infamous,  without  glory  or  honour,  and  reputed  as  guilty  of  high 
•'  treason.  In  like  manner  also,  take  ye  special  care  to  keep  yourselves  from  vili- 
"  fying  yovir  noble  exercise,  and  the  honour  wherewith  you  ought  to  come  near  us 
«'  at  all  times.  See  that  there  be  no  entry  into  princes'  courts,  either  of  drunken 
"  or  evil  speaking,  flattery,  babbhng  indiscreetly,  janglary,  buffoonery,  and  other 
•'  such  vices,  which  file  and  shame  the  reputation  of  men :  Give  good  example, 
"  everywhere  maintain  equity,  and  repair  wrongs  done  by  great  men  to  their  in- 
"  feriors.  Remember  what  privileges  we  have  granted  unto  you  in  recompense 
"  of  the  painful  travels  in  war  ye  have  endured  with  us  ;  and  let  not  the  honour 
"  we  have  bestowed  on  you  be  converted  to  blame  and  infamy  by  dishonest  liv- 
"  ing,  the  punishment  whereof  we  reserve  to  ourself,  and  the  Kings  of  France  oui 
"  successors." 

The  society  of  heralds  in  England  consists  of  thirteen  persons,  viz.  three  Kings 
at  Arms,  which,  by  their  offices,  are  called  Garter,  Clarencieux,  andNorroy:  Garter 
is  the  first  in  dignity,  not  so  much  as  being  the  most  ancient,  as  from  the  superemi- 
nency  of  the  order  after  which  he  is  named.     Clarencieux  and  Norroy  are   called 

Provincial  Kings  at  Arms. Six  heralds,  which,  by  the  names  of  their  additions. 

are  called  Somerset,  Chester,  Windsor,  Richmond,  Lancaster,  York. Four  pur- 
suivants, which,  in  heraldry,  may  be  called  Learners,  to  whom  are  given  tlie  names 
of  Rouge  Dragon,  Portcullis,  Blue  Mantle,  Rouge  Croix;  all  these  by  the  names  of 
Kings,  Heralds,  or  Pursuivants,  are  by  the  kings  themselves  immediately,  or  by  the 
marischals  of  the  kingdom,  with  the  king's  authority,  crowned  with  crowns,  and 
graced  with  colours,  attired  with  their  coats,  named  by  their  names  of  additi  jn, 
and  other  ceremonies  created.  All  of  them  have  an  yearly  salary  out  of  the  king's 
Exchequer,  and  by  a  charter  from  the  crown  are  incorporate,  and  have  many 
privileges  conferred  on  them.  Garter's  peculiar  office  is  to  attend  upon  the  knights 
of  that  order,  advertise  them  of  their  election,  call  them  to  be  installed  at  Wind- 
sor, cause  their  achievements  to  be  hung  upon  their  stalls,  and  to  take  care  of  the 
several  rites  and  ceremonies  at  their  burials.  Of  every  new  emperor,  king,  prince, 
duke,  marquis,  earl,  viscount,  baron,  or  knight  installed  in  this  order,  he  challen- 
geth  the  uppermost  garment  he  weareth  that  day.    He  also  showeth  unto  everj 


1 66  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

new  baron,  called  into  Parliament,  the  place  wherein  he  is  to  sit  among  his  peers, 
and  directeth  all  the  other  ceremonies  of  their  order. 

Clarencieux  is  King  at  Arms  over  all  the  east,  west,  and  south  provinces,  on  the 
south  side  of  the  river  Trent. 

Norroy  is  King  at  Arms  through  the  parts  of  the  kingdom  be-north  the  river 
Trent. 

The  Lyons  Kings  at  Arms  of  Scotland,  by  virtue  of  their  office,  and  by  the  bounty 
of  the  kings,  are  freed  from  all  manner  of  taxes,  watchings,  and  wardings,  &•€.  He 
is  sovereign  judge,  constituted  by  act  of  Parliament  for  punishing  all  usurpers  of 
arms  contrary  to  law.  He  may  give  arms  to  all  persons  craving  the  same,  if  they 
are  able  to  ma.ntain  a  horse  with  furniture  for  the  king's  service;  but  with  these 
especial  restrictions,  "  Dummodo  heretici  non  sint,  contra  fidem,  ex  illegitimo 
"  toro  prognati,  vel  ex  ignobili  sanguine  ormndi,  sed  viri  probi  &-  honesti  nomi- 
"  nis."  He  hath  the  place  of  precedency  before  all  knights  and  gentlemen 
within  the  kingdom,  not  being  officers  of  state,  or  Senators  of  the  College  of 
Justice. 

The  Lyon  in  all  great  solemnities,  as  the  coronations,  marriages,  and  christen- 
ings of  kings,  queens,  or  their  children,  is  vested  with  a  long  robe  of  crimson  vel- 
vet, with  long  tassels  of  silk   hanging  down  to  the   ground ;  this  robe  is  doubled 

■with  silver-coloured  Spanish  taffeta,  and  is  a  fee  to  him  at  such  solemnities. 

His  crown  is  made  close,  all  of  beaten  gold,  after  the  model  of  the  imperial  crown 
of  Scotland,  not  set  with  stones,  but  only  enamelled.      He  may  wear  it  at  all 

solemnities  whatsoever,  except  at  funerals  and  interments. His   batton  is  of 

wood,  coloured  azure,  and  all  over  powdered  with  thistles  of  gold,  which  he  uses 
principally  at  denouncing  of  war,  proclaiming  of  peace,  forfaulting  traitors,  pro- 
clamation of  kings,  &.C. 

As  for  the  name  of  Lyon,  given  to  the  Scots  King  at  Arms,  it  is  taken  from  the 
Lion,  the  ancient  badge  of  our  Scots  monarchs,  borne  by  them  for  their  arms 
since  Fergus  the  first  Scots  Monarch,  and  is  as  ancient  as  since  the  days  of  Mal- 
colm IL  and  some  think  long  before  that  time. 

The  heralds,  being  six  in  number,  have  their  precedency  according  to  the  dates 
of  their  creations.  Their  names  of  addition  are  altogether  local,  and  are  very  an- 
cient. 

Snowdown  is  named  from  Snowdown  Castle  in  the  shire  of  Ross,  and  the  resi- 
dence of  our  ancient  Scots'  kings. 

Albany  is  named  from  the  whole  realm,  which,  by  the  ancients,  was  called ^/^«, 
and  by  our  Highlanders,  who  are  the  native  Scots  to  this  day,  is  called  Albanach, 
This  herald  was  in  use  mostly  to  attend  upon  the  Dukes  of  Albany. 

Ross  herald,  so  named  from  the  county  of  Ross,  which  was  of  old  an  appendage 
of  the  crown.    . 

Rothsay  has  his  name  and  title  from  the  Castle  of  Rothsay,  or  Rosay,  an  an- 
cient tesidence  of  our  Scots  kings  in  the  Isle  of  Bute. 

Marchmont  derives  his  title  from  the  Castle  of  Marchmont,  so  named  in  our  an- 
cient histories,  now  called  Roxburgh  Castle. 

Hay  herald  has  his  denomination  from  an  island  in  the  West  Seas. 

As  for  pursuivants,  they  are  also  for  most  part  locally  denominated  (Unicorn  on- 
ly excepted)  viz.  Carrick,  Kintyre,  Ormond,  and  Bute. 

The  office  of  Lyon  King  at  Arms  in  this  kingdom  has  been  of  old  endued 
with  the  power  of  regality  over  all  these  under  him  ;  for  he  holds  his  office  of  the 
king  immediately,  and  that  by  letters  patent  under  the  Great  Seal  of  Scotland.  It 
was  lawful  for  him  to  repledge  all  his  under  officers,  for  whatever  cause,  from  the 
judgment  of  any  court,  civil,  ecclesiastic,  or  criminal,  the  king  excepted,  upon  his 
finding  caution  to  administer  justice  upon  them  in  his  own  court,  and  to  punish 
them  accordingly.  And  al!  magistrates  and  others  are  commanded,  by  act  of  Par- 
liament, to  be  aiding  and  assisting  to  him  for  putting  the  privileges  of  his  office  in 
execution.  He  has  the  sole  admission  of  all  heralds,  pursuivants,  messengers,  and 
macers ;  bv  him  they  are  created,  and  from  him  all  their  patents  of  office,  as  from 
his  maiest}''s  supreme  o.fficer  of  honour,  proceed.  No  herald  can  give  new  arms 
but  bv  his  licence  and  approbation,  and  his  hand  and  seal  must  be  had  thereto, 
and  all  controversies  among  them  must  be  determined  by  him  and  his  deputes. 

2 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  167 

No  herald  or  pursuivant  could  give  orders  for  funerals  or  interments  but  by  his 
appointment :  neither  could  any  paint  arms  without  his  licence.  And  all  messen- 
gers within  the  kingdom  are  absolutely  subject  to  his  jurisdiction  and  command. 

The  ancient  fees  paid  to  the  Lyon  and  his  brethren,  besides  many  others  settled 
on  them  by  the  royal  bounty,  were,  at  the  creation  of  a  duke,  L.iooo,  a  marqui-. 
L.666  :  3  :4,  an  earl  L.400,  an  arclibishop  L.400,  a  bishop  L.236  :  13  :  4;  of  a 
lord  L.236  ;  13  :  4,  knight  baronet  L.66  :  13  :  4,  knight-batchelor  L. 66 :  13  ;  4,  all 
which  was  equally  divided  amongst  the  Lyon,  heralds,  and  pursuivants,  viz.  to  the 
Lyon  four  shares,  to  every  herald  two,  and  to  every  pursuivant  one.  But  at  fu- 
neral obsequies  they  are  paid  as  they  serve,  without  division.  At  the  pubhcation 
of  peace  in  any  city,  a  silver  bowl  was  the  Lyon's  due,  or  a  merk  of  gold. 
Every  knight  that  carried  a  banner,  and  every  colonel  of  a  regiment  were  obli- 
ged to  pay  the  Lyon  a  mcrk  in  gold,  and  every  captain  a  merk  in  silver  ;  for 
which  he  was  obliged  to  register  their  names,  surnames,  and  qualities,  with  their 
arms,  for  the  preservation  of  their  honour.  Every  herald  or  pursuivant,  for  each 
proclamation  they  publish  concerning  the  state,  was  to  have  an  angel  of  gold  : 
And  to  them  belongs  the  executing  of  letters  of  treason,  &-c.  for  which  they  are 
paid  according  to  paction.  But  as  these  things  have,  of  late  years,  undergone 
several  alterations,  we  shall  insist  no  farther  upon  them :  only,  betore  we  conclude 
this  chapter,  we  shall  set  down  the  several  oaths  taken  of  old  by  the  Lyon  and  his 
brethren,  by  which  the  reader  will  have  a  more  distinct  view  of  what  they  several- 
ly were  bound  to  perform  by  their  offices. 


THE    OATH    OF   THE    LYON. 

"  First,  Whensoevir  the  king's  majestic  sail  command  you  to  doany  message  to 
any  uthir  king  or  prince,  estait,  or  persone,  that  you  sail  doe  that  als  honourablie 
and  treulie  as  your  witt  and  reasone  can  shew  you,  and  als  .-^reatlie  to  the  ad- 
vantage of  your  said  soverane  lord,  and  trew  report  bring  against  his  heighness 
of  what  ye  sail  do,  as  neir  to  the  charge  to  you  committit  in  words  and  sub- 
stance, as  your  reason  may  attain  :  So  alway  keip  your  self  free  from  any 
maner  of  motione,  save  to  such  persons  as  you  be  commandit  to  utter  your 
chairge  unto. 

"  Secondly,  Ye  sail  doe  your  true  endeavour,  as  God  may  help  you,  every  day 
to  be  more  cunning  then  uthers  in  the  office  of  amies,  so  that  you  be  the  bet- 
ter furnished  to  execute  with  more  wisdome  and  eloquence  such  charges  as 
your  soverane  sail  lay  unto  you  by  vertue  of  the  office  his  sacred  majestic  heath 
committit  unto  your  charge. 

"  Thirdly,  Ye  sail  do  your  full  knowledge  of  all  noblemen  and  gentillmen  with- 
in this  realm,  which  sould  beir  coates  in  the  feild,  in  service  of  our  soverane 
lord,  his  lieutenant,  officers,  or  commissioners,  and  them  with  their  isshewes 
trulia  register,  and  such  amies  as  they  bear,  v/ith  their  difference  dew  in  armes 
to  be  given,  and  if  they  hold  any  service  by  knights  fee,  whereby  they  sould 
hold  and  doe  the  king  service  for  the  defence  of  his  land. 

"  Fourthlie,  Ye  sail  not  be  straing  to  teach  heraulds  or  pursevants,  nor  to  ease 
them  in  such  questions  as  they  sail  move  to  you. 

"  Lastlie,  Ye  sail  prom^is  to  registrat  all  acts  of  honor  in  maner  and  forme  as 
they  be  done,  so  far  as  your  cunning  and  power  sail  extend. 


THE    OATH    OF   A   HERALD   .\ND    PURSUIVANT    WHICH    THEY    GIVE    AT    THEJR 
CREATION. 

"  First,  Ye  sail  swear  that  ye  sail  be  trew  and  faithfuU  to  your  soverane  lord 
the  king,  and  if  ye  have  any  knowledge,  or  heir  any  imagination  of  treasoane, 
or  heir  any  language  or  word,  that  sould  so  move,  or  sound  to  the  deroga- 
tione  of  his  honor,  stait,  or  heighness  (which  God  defend)  in  that  caise,  so  soon 
as  it  is  possible,  ye  sail  discover  the  same  to  the  King  ot  Armes,  who  sail  go  with 
you,  either  to  his  highness  or  his  counsell,  as  God  sail  bliss  vou. 
Vol,  IL  4  A 


i68  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

"  Also  you  sail  swear,  that  you  sail  be  conversant  and  serviceable  to  all  gen- 
"  tillmen,  to  do  their  commandments  to  their  worship  by  your  good  counsaill 
"  which  God  heath  sent  you. 

"  Also  you  sail  swear  and  promeis  to  keip  the  secreits  of  knights,  esquires,  and 
"  ladies,  as  a  confessor  of  armes,  and  not  to  discover  them  m  any  manner  except 
"  it  be  treasone  against  the  kings  most  excellent  majestic. 

"  Also  you  sail  promeis  and  swear,  if  that  ye  be  in  any  place,  where  ye  may 
•■'  heir  any  language  betwixt  graittmen  and  gentiUmen,  that  is  not  worschipfull, 
"  or  profeitable,  nor  generous,  that  ye  keip  your  mouth  closse,  and  report  it  not 
"  furth  to  any  living  bot  to  themselves. 

"  Also  you  sail  promeis  and  swear,  that  from  hencefurthe  you  sail  forsake  all  dis- 
"  honest  places,  that  ye  naythir  keip  taverne  nor  aillhouse,  ather  by  yourselvis, 
"  wyffe,  or  families,  but  onlie  apply  yourselves  to  vertue,  the  studie  of  armes, 
"  genealogies,  search  of  records,  moniments  and  antiquities,  with  lyk  exerciss  of 
"  honour.     So  help  you  God. 

"  Also  you  sole  m  lie  promeis  and  swear  to  obey  the  commandments  and  instruc- 
"  tions,  with  all  uther  the  imployments  of  the  King  of  Armes,  in  all  matters  con- 
"  cerning  honor  and  armes  ;  and  also  in  all  uthyr  particulars  and  matters  contin'd 
"  in  the  several  privileges  of  his  office.  So  more  help  you  God,  and  by  the  oath 
"  you  have  maid." 

CHAP.     XVII. 

OF    PRECEDENCY. 

AMONGST  those  who  are  supreme,  kings  have  the  preference  from  com- 
monwealths ;  and,  among  kings,  emperors  are  allowed  the  first  place  ;  and 
yet  hereditary  kings  may  debate  the  precedency  with  them  when  they  are  but 
elective. 

The  French  Kings  have  debated  their  precedency  with  the  Kings  of  Spain  for 
many  years,  till  at  last  it  was  yielded  in  favours  of  the  French. 

The  King  of  Great  Britain  claims  precedency  to  them  both.  i.  As  being  king 
of  that  Isle,  which  was  first  Christian.  2.  Upon  his  being  anointed,  and  one  of 
the  quatuor  iincti,  which  were  before  all  other  kings.  3.  That  having  conquered 
France,  he  has  right  to  all  the  precedency  which  France  can  acclaim.  And,  to 
Spain,  the  King  of  England  was  preferred  in  the  general  councils  of  Pisa,  Con- 
stance, and  Basil. 

But  the  King  of  Great  Britain,  as  King  of  Scotland,  may  justly  claim  prece- 
deny  of  all  these  kings ;  for  it  is  a  received  maxim,  that  among  those  of  equal  dig- 
nity, he  who  first  attained  to  that  dignity  is  to  be  preferred;  and  the  i>ing  of 
Scotland  being  equal  in  dignity  to  the  Kings  of  England,  P'rance,  and  Spain,  at- 
tained to  that  dignity  before  any  of  them.  For  Fergus  1.  came  into  Scotland  330 
years  before  the  birth  of  Christ ;  whereas  it  is  contest  by  the  English  historian 
Polydore,  that  Egbert,  the  first  English  king,  did  begin  his  reign  iioo  years  after 
our  Saviour's  birth. 

As  to  the  monarchy  of  Spain,  they  are  no  older  than  Rodolphus  King  of  the 
Romans,  elected  in  the  year  1273,  by  whom  the  House  of  Austria  did  rise  to  this 
dignity.    ,  .     .  .  ,  -        , 

As  to  the  now  reigning  Kings  of  France,  they  are  only  descend(jd  from  Hugh 
Capet,  who  usurped  the  throne  in  anno  987.  And  not  being  descended  of  either 
the  Carlovingian  or  Merovingian  races,  they  cannot  compete  with  our  kings, 
Achaius  King  of  Scotland  having  been  contemporary  with  Charles  le  Magne,  the 
first  of  the  Carlovingian  race;  and  yet  Achaius  was  but  the  sixty-fifth  of  the  Scots 
Kings ;  and  the  leagues  betwixt  the  said  Achaius  and  the  said  Charles  are  not  only 
asserted  by  Scots  and  French  Historians,  but  confessed  by  all  strangers. 

And  if  the  Christian  race  be  allowed  preference,  the  Kings  of  Scotland  ought 
on  that  account  to  hav;  the  pre-eminence  also ;  for  Donald  King  of  Scots  embraced 
the  Christian  faith  in  anno  199,  before  either  William  the  Conqueror  succeeded  to 
England,  or  Hugh  Capet  to  France,  and  long  before  Spain  obeyed  its  ,late  race  of 
monarchs. 

And  though  it  must  be  owned,  that  in  the  council  of  Constance,  England  and 

2 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  165 

France  were  prefened  to  Scotland,  yet,  as  Gothofred  observes,  that  proceeded  from 
the  partiality  of  the  Church  of  Rome,  which  always  preferred  those  who  were  able 
to  do  them  most  service  ;  and  surelj,  according,  to  the  Christian  religion,  as  that 
race  ought  to  be  preferred  whose  title  is  justest,  so  the  Scots  Kings  never  having 
usurped  over  the  people  which  they  governed,  they  have  a  just  title  to  precedency 
on  that  account  above  all  others. 

And  as  to  that  silly  and  groundless  pretence,  that  the  Kings  of  Scotland  were 
vassals  of  the  Kings  of  England,  the  same  is  so  pertinently  and  fully  redargued  by 
Sir  George  Mackenzie  in  his  Right  of  Precedency,  that  it  would  be  lost  labour  tu 
enter  upon  it  in  this  place. 

The  King  of  Sweden  pretends  to  precedency  over  Denmark,  though  it  i^  vcr_\ 
dubious,  Denmark  having  likewise  claimed  precedency  from  Sweden.  The  Kings 
of  Sweden  have  claimed  precedency  above  all  Christian  princes,  as  being  the  true 
successors  of  the  Gotliic  Kings,  who  exacted  tribute  even  from  the  Emperors 
and  Kings  of  France.  Both  Denmark  and  Sweden  claim  precedency  from  the 
King  of  Poland,  as  being  an  elected  and  limited  monarch.  The  King  of  Poland 
has  claimed  precedency  of  the  King  of  Portugal,  though  it  has  been  determined  in 
favour  of  the  latter. 

There  are  other  sovereigns  who  are  not  crowned  heads,  such  as  Mantua,  Flo- 
rence, Ferrara,  Parma,  Venice,  &c.  who  debate  their  respective  precedencies ; 
but  it  is  not  easy  to  determine  them,  some  having  it  one  time,  and  some  at 
another. 

Commonwealths  themselves  have  contended  for  precedency  of  any  one  king, 
on  these  accounts  ;  that  they  being  the  freest  of  all  men,  are  the  noblest  ;  and 
they  being  in  effect  a  country  of  kings,  ought  to  be  preferred  to  any  one  king  ; 
especially  since  their  government  is  elder  than  that  of  kings,  men  having  drawn 
themselves  into  societies  before  they  either  submitted  to  or  elected  kings. 

Some  commonwealths  claim  precedency,  as  having  right  to  kingdoms,  as  Venice, 
on  account  of  her  right  to  the  kingdom  of  Corsica.  Genoa  has  contended  with 
Venice,  but  without  success. 

The  States  General  contend  with  Venice,  and  all  other  commonwealths,  as  be- 
ing the  more  powerful,  and  being  a  society  of  commonwealths.  They  pretend  also 
to  precedency  of  all  the  princes  of  the  empire,  as  being  more  independent :  But  yet 
that  has  been  decided  against  them  by  the  emperor  in  later  times. 

Among  the  princes  of  the  empire,  the  electors  are  still  preferred ;  and  amongst 
these  the  ecclesiastics  are  preferred  to  the  laics.  Next  to  the  electors  the  Archduke 
of  Austria  has  the  precedency  in  the  empire.  The  eldest  sons  of  electors  precede 
all  other  princes  of  the  empire. 

Churchmen  themselves  have  had  as  much  bustle  about  precedency  as  any  others 
whatever  ;  witness  the  Patriarchs  of  Rome,  Constantinople,  Antioch,  Alexandria, 
and  Jerusalem.  The  two  former  claimed  precedency,  because  their  sees  were  the 
seats  of  the  Roman  and  Grecian  empires  ;  those  of  Jerusalem,  because  the  chief 
priesthood  was  once  settled  there  ;  those  of  Antioch,  because  it  was  the  first  seat  ot 
Christianity  ;  and  those  of  Alexandria,  as  being  the  chief  city  of  the  east,  before 
the  building  of  Constantinople. 

The  Roman  Patriarch  was,  by  the  Emperor  Phocas,  raised  above  all  the  rest  in 
the  year  606;  since  which  time  they  have  raised  themselves  to  the  papacy,  though 
it  cannot  be  denied  but  even  before  that  they  had  the  first  seat  in  all  councils. 
And  though  it  be  pretended  that  Constantine  the  Great  did,  from  Christian  hu- 
mility, prefer  the  successor  of  Peter,  as  vicar  of  Jesus  Christ,  to  himself,  and  is 
brought  in  Cap.  Constantimis  14.  dest.  96.  as  acknowledging  himself  to  have  led  the 
pope's  bridle,  and,  in  the  famous  ceremonial  of  Rome,  fol.  21.  the  emperor  is  al- 
lowed no  higher  place  than  the  pope's  footstool  ;  yet  these  things  have  been  stre- 
nuously opposed  by  the  emperors,  and  not  pretended  to  in  latter  times  by  the 
popes  themselves. 

Cardinals  have  debated  precedency  W'ith  patriarchs,  though  adjudged  to  belong 
to  the  latter.  Sixtus  Quintus  raised  cardinals  to  an  equal  degree  with  kings  ;  and 
if  kings  be  present  at  table,  if  there  be  but  one,  he  is  to  sit  after  the  first  cardinal 
bishop,  and  if  more,  they  sit  m,ixtly  with  the  cardinals.  But  this  is  not  yielded 
to  by  princes  who  profess  the  reformed  religion. 


jpo  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

The  bishops  of  Scotland  preceded  in  this  manner  ;  archbishops,  St  AndreWi 
and  Glasgow ;  bishops  of  Edinburgh,  Galloway,  Dunkeld,  Aberdeen,  Murray, 
Ross,  Brechin,  Dumblane,  Caithness,  the  Isles,  Argyle  and  Orkney.  Marqiiis;es 
in  old  times  took  place  of  archbishops :  But,  in  latter  times,  in  imitation  of  Eng- 
land, archbishops  take  place  of  all  dukes  and  marquisses  ;  yea,  the  Archbishop  of 
St  Andrews  took  place  of  the  Chancellor,  by  virtue  of  a  letter  from  the  Sovereign 
anno  1664. 

The  bishops  of  England  precede  thus ;  archbishops,  Canterbury  and  York  ; 
bishops  t)f  London,  Durham,  Winchester,  St  Davids,  Ely,  Norwich,  Hereford, 
Salisbury,  Peterborough,  Carlisle,  Worcester,  Rochester,  Landaff,  Lincoln,  Ban- 
gour,  Exeter,  Chichester,  St  Asaph,  Oxford,  Litchfield  and  Coventry,  Bristol,  Glou- 
cester, Chester,  and  Bath  and  Wells. 

Nobility  is  divided  into  nobiles  mnjores  et  minores ;  under  the  greater  are  com- 
prehended all  such  as  are  lords  of  Parliament ;  under  the  lesser  are  comprehended 
knights  and  gentlemen;  and  though  all  these  be  not  peers  of  Parhament,  yet  they 
are  all  peers  to  one  another,  seeing  a  gentleman  may  be  married  to  a  duke's 
daughter;  and  though  noblemen  must  be  judged  by  their  peers,  yet  landed  gentle- 
men may  pass  upon  their  assize,  and  a  nobleman  is  obliged  to  accept  of  a  chal- 
lenge from  a  gentleman,  were  duels  lawful.  It  is  doubtful  whether  the  younger 
sons  of  dukes  and  marquisses  are  to  be  ranked  among  the  nobiles  majores,  or  mi- 
nores, since,  on  the  one  hand,  they  sit  not  in  Parliament,  and  on  the  other  they 
are  designed  Lord,  and  take  place  of  many  of  the  nobiles  majores. 

In  Scotland  the  king's  children,  uncles,  and  nephews  only  had  precedency  of 
all  subjects,  and  no  remoter  degree  and  precedency  on  account  of  his  relation  to 
our  kings. 

The  first  place,  next  to  the  king,  was  due  to  the  Prince  of  Scotland,  who  was 
likewise  Duke  of  Rothsay,  and  the  King's  second  son  was  Earl  of  Ross. 

It  has  been  doubted  whether  the  king's  uncle,  &.c.  has  the  precedency  of  the 
officers  of  state  at  the  coronation,  riding  of  the  parliament,  &.c.  in  which  it  was 
the  Constable's  privilege  to  ride  upon  the  king's  right  hand,  and  the  Marischal's  on 
his  left :  But  the  Duke  of  York  preceded  all  officers  at  the  coronation  of  king 
Charles  II. 

Amongst  princes  of  the  blood  the  last  descended  from  the  royal  family  has  still 
precedency :  But  though  this  hold  in  the  branches,  yet  the  eldest  of  the  same 
branch  will  precede  all  of  that  branch. 

The  nobility  of  Scotland  were  either  declared  such  by  feudal  erections,  their 
lands  being  erected  by  the  king  into  a  dutchy,  earldom,  &-c.  which  did  of  itself 
make  him  a  duke  or  earl  in  whose  favour  the  lands  were  so  erected  :  or  else  they 
got  the  patents  of  honour  declaring  them  dukes,  earls,  &-c.  and  this  is  a  much  later 

way,  none  being  nobilitate  by   patents  amongst  us  before  King  James  I. The 

third  way  of  nobilitating  with  us,  is  by  creation  and  solemn  investiture;  the  whole 
form  of  which  we  have  given  in  the  preceding  chapter,  in  the  instance  of  the 
Marquisses  of  Hamilton  and  Huntly,  anno  1599. 

The  English  nobility  are  sometimes  created  by  being  called  in  a  writ  to  Par- 
liament under  the  designations  of  Earls,  Viscounts,  &c.  which  was  unknown  in 
Scotland. 


Precedency  among  Subjects  is  thus  established  both  in  Scotland  and  England. 

Dukes  of  the  blood  royal. 

Other  dukes  according  to  their  creation. 

Eldest  sons  of  dukes  of  the  blood  royal. 

Marquisses  according  to  their  creation. 

Dukes'  eldest  sons. 

Earls  according  to  their  creation. 

Marquisses'  eldest  sons. 

Dukes'  younger  sons. 

Viscounts  according  to  their  creation. 

Earls'  eldest  sons. 

Marquisses'  younger  sons. 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  iqi 

Barons,  whom  we  call  lords. 

Viscounts'  eldest  sons. 

Earls'  younger  sons. 

Barons'  eldest  sons. 

Baronets. 

Viscounts'  younger  sons. 

At  the  coronation  of  King  Charles  I.  the  precedency  of  the  nobility  of  Scotland 
was  ordered  to  be  the  sama  with  that  in  England  ;  and  to  prevent  differences  be- 
twixt the  nobility  of  both  kingdoms,  it  was  ordered,  that  all  those  of  the  same  de- 
gree in  England  should,  in  England,  take  place  from  all  those  of  the  same  degree 
in  Scotland  :  And  all  those  of  tlie  same  degree  in  Scotland  should,  in  Scotland, 
take  place  of  the  English;  that  is  to  say,  all  the  English  Dukes  should  take  place 
in  England  of  all  the  Scots  dukes,  and  all  the  Scots  dukes  in  Scotland  should  take 
place  ot"  all  the  English  dukes,  &-c. 

In  anno  1623,  King  James  VI.  settled  the  precedency  among  his  officers  and 
counsellors  thus : 

The  Lord  Chancellor. 
The  Lord  Treasurer. 
The  Archbishop  of  St  Andrews. 
The  Archbishop  of  Glasgow. 
The  Earls  and  Viscounts  according  to  their  ranks. 
Bishops  according  to  their  ranks. 
Lord  Privy  seal. 
Lord  Secretary. 
Lord  Register. 
Lord  Advocate. 
Lord  Justice  Clerk. 
Lord  Treasurer-depute. 

The  Lords  of  Session  according  to  their  admission,  barons  and  gen- 
tlemen, being  counsellors,  according  to  their  admission. 

With  us  the  eldest  sons  of  barons  are  designed  masters,  and  the  uncles  of  lords 
were  called  masters,  probably  for  no  other  reason  but  that  they  wanted  a  title, 
and  so  took  up  this,  which  occasioned  afterwards  the  word  master  to  be  given  to 
peirsons  whose  names  were  not  known. 

By  act  of  Parliament  1661,  the  President  of  the  Session  is  declared  to  have  pre- 
cedency of  the  Lords  Register,  Advocate,  and  Treasurer-depute. 

The  ibth  of  November  1729,  the  Lord  President  of  the  Session  produced  to  the 
lords  a  letter  from  Queen  Caroline,  guardian  of  the  kingdom,  to  the  President  and 
Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice  in  Scotland,  for  settling  the  precedency  of  the 
courts  of  justice  therein,  which  was  read,  and  ordered  to  be  recorded,  whereof  the 
tenor  follows : 


ByUFr  Majesty  the  ^leen,  Guardian  of  the  Kingdom,  &-c. 

Caroline,  R.  C.  R. 

"  FORASMUCH  as  we  have  been  informed,  that  doubts  have  frequently  arisen 
between  the  Senators  of  his  Majesty's  College  of  Justice,  and  the  Barons  of 
his  Exchequer,  in  that  part  of  his  Majesty's  kingdom  of  Great  Britain,  called 
Scotland,  concerning  their  rank  and  precedency  ;  and  we  are  willing  to  prevent 
any  uneasiness,  jealousies,  or  disputes  between  the  members  of  two  bodies  so 
highly  intrusted  by  his  Majesty,  and  of  so  great  use  and  importance  to  his  ser- 
vice, and  to  the  good  government  and  welfare  of  his  people  :  Therefore,  we  do,  in 
his  Majesty's  name,  by  these  presents,  appoint  and  ordain,  that  you,  the  Presi- 
dent of  his  Majesty's  said  College  of  Justice,  shall  have  the  first  place,  and  on 
all  occasions  shall  take  rank,  and  have  precedency  of  the  Chief  Baron  of  hi'' 
Vol.  II.  4  B 


192 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


"  Majesty's  Exchequer  there ;  and   the  said  Chief  Baron   shall  continue  to  take- 

"  rank,  and  have  precedency  of  the  remanent  Senators  of  his  Majesty's  said  Col- 

"  lege  of  Justice;  and  the  remanent  Senators  of  the  said  College  of  Justice,  and  the 

"  Barons  of  Ills  Majesty's  Exchequer,  shall  take  place  of  each  other,  accordmg  to 

"  the  date  of  their  commission  or   appointment  to  their   respective  offices ;  that  is 

"  to  say,  that  every  Senator  of  his  Majesty's  said  College   of  Justice,  whose  com- 

"  mission  or  appointment  to  his  said  office  is  of  an  elder  date',  shall  take  place,  and 

"  have  the  rank  and  precedency  of  and  above  all  Senators  of  his  Majesty's  said 

"  College  of  Justice,  and  Barons  of  his  Majesty's  said  Exchequer,  whose  commis- 

"  sions  or  appointments  are  of  a  later  date  ;  and  that  every  Baron  of  his  Majesty's 

"  said  Exchequer,  whose  commissions  or  appointments  are  of  an  elder  date,  shall  in 

"  like  manner  take  place,  and  have  the  rank  and  precedency  of  and  above  all  Se- 

"  nators  of  his  Majesty's  said  College  of  Justice,  and  Barons  of  his  Majesty's  said 

"  Exchequer,  whose  commissions  or  appointments   are  of  a  later  date  :    And  if  it 

"  shall  happen  that  the  commissions  or  appointments  of  one  of  the  Senators  of  his 

"  Majesty's  said  College  of  Justice,  and  one  of  the  Barons   of  his  Majesty's  said 

"  Exchequer,  shall  be  of  the  same  date,  then  the  said   Senator  shall  take  place, 

"  and  have  rank  and  precedency  of  and  before  the  said  Baron.     And  this  we  do  in 

"  his  Majesty's  name  ordain,  appoint,  and  establish,  to  be   the  constant  and  unal- 

"  teVable  rule  and  order  in  this  respect,  from  henceforth  in  all  time  coming ;  pro- 

"  vided  always,  that  the  same  shall  not  extend  to  deprive  any  peer  of  his  Majesty's 

"  realm,  or  the  son  of  a  Peer,  or  any  other  whatsomever  enjoying  any  of  the  above- 

"  mentioned  offices,  and  having  rank  and  precedency  by  reason  of  such  his  peerage 

"  or  birth,  or  on  any  other  occasion  not  relative  to  his  office  of  Senator  of  his  Ma- 

*'  jesty's  said  College  of  Justice,  or  Baron  of  his   Majesty's   said  Exchequer,  from 

"  bruiking  and  enjoying  such  rank  or  precedency,  any  thing  in  these  presents  to 

"  the  contrary  notwithstanding  :  And   so  we  bid  you  heartily  farewell.     Given  at 

"  at  the  Court  at  Kensington  the  twenty-fourth  day  of  July  one  thousand  seven 

"  hundred  and  twenty-nine,  in  the  third  year  of  her  Majesty's  reign.     By  hei: 

"  Majesty's  command, 

HoLLES  Newcastle. 

The  Order  of  Baronet  in  Scotland  was  erected  for  advancing  the  plantation  of 
NovS  Scotia  in  Amedca,  and  for  settling  a  colony  there,  to  which  the  ard  of  these 
knights  was  designed. 

The  Order  of  Baronet  in  England  was  erected  for  advancing  the  plantation  of 
Ulster  in  Ireland. 

Barons  in  England  are  lords  with  us;  but  a  baron  with  us  is  properly  he  who 
has  power  of  pit  and  gallows. 

The  old  barons,  or  lairds,  amongst  us,  especially  where  they  are  chiefs  of  clans, 
refuse  to  cede  precedency  to  knights  baronets,  and  much  less  to  ordinary  knights; 
though  the  others  pretend,  and  justly,  that  a  baron  is  no  name  of  dignity,  and  that 
knights  baronets  have  a  special  privilege,  that  there  shall  be  no  degree  betwixt 
them  and  lords,  except  bannerets;  that  is,  such  as  should  be  created  under  the 
royal  standard  in  open  war,  the  king  being  present;  and  it  must  be  owned,  that  next 
to  knights  baronets,  succeed  knights-batchelors,  and  next  to  them  our  lairds  or 
landed  gentlemen ;  though  a  laird  is  but  the  corrupt  word  of  a  lord.- 

Amongst  such  as  profess  sciences,  the  rankmg  goes  thus  uncontrovertedly.  i. 
Such  as  profess  Theology.  i.  Such  as  profess  the  Canon  Law.  3,  The  Civil  Law. 
4.  Philosophy.  5.  Medicine.  6.  Rhetoric.  7.  Poesy.  8.  History.  9.  Gram- 
mar. 10.  Logic.  II.  Arithmetic.  12.  Geometry.  13.  Music.  14.  Astronomy ; 
and  among  these  such  as  are  Doctors  precede  those  that  are  not. 

Women,  before  their  marriage,  have  precedency  by  their  father;  but  there  is 
this  difference  betwixt  them  and  the  male  children,  that  the  same  precedency  is 
due  to  all  the  daughters  that  is  due  to  the  eldest,  though  it  is  not  so  amongst  the 
sons;  and  the  reason  of  this  seems  to  be,  that  the  daughters  would  succeed  all 
equally,  whereas  the  eldest  son  excludes  all  the  rest. 

During  the  marriage,  the  wife  regularly  participates  of  the  condition  of  her  hus- 
band; and,  in  France,  they  communicate  of  the  husband's  titles;  and  thus  they 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


I9J 


say,  Madam  la  Chaiiceliere,  i\Iadam  la  Presidente;  yet  it  is  not  so  with  us,  wha 
think  that  offices  are  bestowed  on  husbands  upon  a  personal  account. 

By  our  law,  if  a  woman  have  precedency  by  her  birth  or  descent,  she  retains  still 
the  same,  notwithstanding  she  marry  a  person  of  inferior  dignity ;  though  this  be 
contrary  to  the  civil  law,  and,  indeed,  he  being  her  head,  it  is  unnatural  that  any 
part  should  be  more  honourable  than  the  head.  But  it  is  observable,  that  if  the 
daughter  of  a  nobleman  marry  another  nobleman,  she  will  lose  the  precedency 
due  to  her  by  her  birtli,  though  she  would  not  have  lost  it  if  she  had  married  a 
gentleman. 

After  the  husband's  decease  the  wife  enjoys  her  husband's  precedency  during 
her  widowirv';  but-  if  she  many  to  a-  person  of  inferior  quality,  slie  loses  that  pre- 
cedency; though  the  queen  never  loses  her  former  dignity,  though  she  marry  the 
meanest  person  after  the  king's  death;  notwithstanding  her  bastards  are  not  noble, 
as  the  bastards  of  the  king  are;  nor  does  the  womb  ever  nobilitate.  By  the  civil 
law,  a  widow  living  lewdly  loses  her  former  dignity. 

The  wives  and  daughters  of  all  dukes,  marquisses,  earls,  &.c.  do  take  the  same 
place  that  the  husbands  and  sons  do,  conform  to  their  precedency. 

When  princes  or  judges  intend  to  shun  deciding  of  controversies  concerning  pre- 
cedency, and  to  preserve  the  rights  of  all  the  competitors,  they  ordain  the  compe- 
titors to  precede  one  another  by  turns,  and  alternately.  And,  lest  the  first  turn  should 
givethe  precedency,  order  that  to  be  decided,  by  lot.  2r.  They  cause  them  enter 
by  several  doors.  3.  They  use  round  tables,  or  write  the  pretenders  names  in  a 
circle.  4.  The  eldest  of  the  com.petitors  is  ordered  to  precede,  or  according  as 
they  produce  their  commissions.  5.  Some  use  to  secure  themselves  by  protesta- 
tions, which  certainly  do  interrupt  prescription. 

As  to  the  peerage  of  Scotland,  the  best  account  that  can  be  given  of  them  at 
this  period  is  the  return  of  the  Lords  of  Session  to  an  order  of  the  Right  Honour- 
able the  Lords  Spiritual  and  Temporal  in  Parliament  assembled,  the  12th  of  June 
1739,  with  which  we  shall  conclude;  and  is  verbatim  as  follows: 

"  May  it  please  your  Lordships, 

"  In  obedience  to  your  Lordships'  order  of  the  12th  June  last,  requiring  that  the 
Lords  of  Session  in  Scotland  do  make  up  a  roll  or  list  of  the  peers  of  Scotland  at 
the  time  of  the  Union,  whose  peerages  are  still  continuing,  and  do  lay  the  same 
before  your  Lordships  in  the  next  Session  of  Parliament;  and  that  the  said  Lords 
do,  as  far  as  they  shall  be  able,  state  in  such  roll  or  list  the  particular  limitations 
of  such  peerages. 

"  The  Lords  of  Session  have,  by  committees  of  their  own  number,  made  all  the 
inquiry  they  have  been  able,  by  searching  into  the  public  records,  and  examining 
the  proper  officers  to  whose  care  the  keeping  of  them  is  committed,  in  order  to 
give-your  Lordships  all  the  satisfaction  that  is  in  their  power.  And  they  humbly 
beg  leave  to  report, 

"  Thatafterthj^  most  careful  search  and  examination.,  they  have  not  hitherto  found 
amongst  the  records  any  roll  or  list  of  the  peers  of  Scotland,  at  the  time  of  the 
Union,  authenticated  by  the  subscription  of  the  Lord  Register,  or  of  any  other  officer 
or  person  whatsoever;  all  they  have  been  able  to  meet  with  to  give  satisfaction  in 
this  particular,  is  an  unsigned  writing  on  a  slieet  of  paper,  intitled  Roll  of  Parlia- 
ment 1706,  bearing,  first,  a  list  of  the  peers  according  to  their  rank;  next,  a  hst  of 
commissioners  from  shires  to  that  Parliament ;  and  then  a  list  of  the  commission- 
ers from  burghs:  and  this  writing,  some  of  the  officers  who  were  then  employed 
under  the  Lord  Register  say,  was  the  very  roll  or  list  that  was  daily  called  over  in 
the  last  Parliament  of  Scotland,  pursuant  to  the  constant  practice  of  calling  over 
the  roll  both  of  peers  and  commons,  who  sat  together  in  one  house,  before  the 
house  proceeded  to  business;  and  also  of  collecting  the  voices,  by  calling  over  the 
rolls  wlien  any  point  was  to  be  resolved  by  a  question:  Tliey  also  find  that  this 
roll  or  list  has,  ever  since  the  Union,  been  looked  upon  as  authentic,  and  that 
copies  thereof,  so  far  as  concerns  the  peerage,  have  been  made  use  of,  with  some 
additions  hereafter  to  be  mentioned,  a  id  called  over  at  every  meeting  of  the  peers 
of  Scotland  fo-  the  election  of  one  or  mire  peers  to  serve  in  the  Parliament  of 
Great  Britain,  from  tiie  year  1708  down  to  this  time.     And  that  your  Lordshi^is 


i(j4 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


may  be  able  to  discover  whether  this  list  agrees  with  that  which  was  laid  before 
your  Lordships  by  the  Lord  Register  of  Scotland,  in  obedience  to  your  Lurdships' 
order  of  the  izd  December  1707,  a  copy  of  the  list  of  peers,  as  it  sands  in  the  said 
roll,  is  hereunto  annexed  m  the  Appendix,  and  marked  No.  I. 

"  They  further  report,  that  this  roll,  or  list  of  peers,  which  they  consider  as  that 
which  was  de  praxi  made  use  of,  and  called  over  in  the  last  Parliament  of  Scotland, 
in  which  the  Union  was  enacted,  and  therefore  deemed  to  be  a  true  one,  has  suf- 
fered several  alterations  since  that  time,  some  of  which  are  of  that  nature  and  no- 
toriety that  they  may  presume  to  certify  them  to  your  Lordships;  whereas  they 
must  content  themselves,  with  respect  to  others,  with  stating  the  case  so  far  as  it 
appears  to  them,  without  concluding  positively  from  what  they  shall  so  state:  One 
great  alteration  they  refer  to  is,  what  was  made  by  the  attainders  of 


EARLS 

VISCOUNTS 

LORDS 

Marischal,' 

Southesk,                     Kenmure, 

Sinclair, 

Marr, 

Airly,                           Kingston, 

Burleigh 

Nithsdale, 

Carnwath                     Kilsyth. 

Duflus, 

Winton, 

Callander,  by  the  at- 

Nairn. 

Linlithgow 

tainder  of  Earl 

Perth, 

Linlithgow, 

Seaforth, 

Panmure. 

of  high  treason,  for  their  accession  to  the  unnatural  rebellion  that  was  raised  in  the 
year  1715,  which  takes  nineteen  out  of  the  said  roll  or  list  of  the  peerage  of  Scot- 
land. Another  alteration  they  presume  to  mention,  because  it  is  certain,  is  the^ 
addition  of  three  peers  to  the  said  list;  to  wit,  his  Royal  Highness  the  Prince  of 
Wales,  Prince  and  Steward  of  Scotland,  by  the  title  of  Duke  of  Rothsay,  under 
which  his  present  Majesty,  whilst  pripce,  voted  by  list,  at  the  election  of  a  peer  to 
serve  in  Parhament  in  the  room  of  the  Marquis  of  Tweeddale,  anno  1716;  and  the 
Lords  Somerville,  and  Colvil  of  Culross,  who,  by  your  Lordships'  resolutions  of  the 
27th  of  May  1723,  were  found  to  have  right  to  the  honours  and  dignity  which 
they  respectively  claimed,  and  who,  on  the  31st  of  that  month,  obtained  a  signifi- 
cation of  his  late  Majesty's  pleasure,  by  the  Duke  of  Roxburgh,  then  Secretary  of 
State,  to  the  Lord  Register  of  Scotland,  to  place  them  in  the  list  of  the  peers  of 
Scotland,  conform  to  your  Lordships'  resolutions  aforesaid ;  and  they  have  accord- 
ingly voted  at  the  succeeding  elections:  Taking  therefore  from  the  said  roll  or  Hst 
in  the  appendix,  the  said  nineteen  peers  attainted,  and  adding  thereto  the  three 
peers  last  described,  they  humbly  certify  to  your  Lordship^,  that  the  roll  or  list  of 
the  peers  of  Scotland  stands  at  present,  so  far  as  with  certainty  appears  to  them, 
rhu*;.- 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


175 


DUKES 

EARLS 

VISCOUNTS 

LORDS 

His  Royal  Hish- 

•  Glencairn, 

Aboyne, 

Arbuthnot, 

Blantyre, 

ness  the  Princt 

?  Eglinton, 

Newburgh, 

Oxford, 

Cardioss, 

Rothsay, 

Cassilis, 

Kilmarnock, 

L-vine, 

ColvilofCulross, 

Hamilton, 

Caithness, 

Dundonald, 

Dumblane, 

Cranston, 

Buccleugh, 

Murray, 

Dumbarton, 

Preston, 

Jedburgh, 

Lennox, 

Hume, 

Kintore, 

Newhaven, 

Maderty, 

Gordon, 

Wigton, 

Breadalbane, 

Strathallan, 

Cupar, 

Qiieensberry, 

Strathmore, 

Aberdeen, 

Teviot, 

Napier, 

Aigyle, 

Abercorn, 

Dunmore, 

Duplin, 

Cameron, 

Douglas, 

Kelly, 

Melville, 

Garnock, 

Cramond, 

Athol, 

Haddington, 

Orkney, 

Primrose. 

Reay, 

Montrose, 

Galloway, 

Ruglen, 

LORDS. 

Forrester, 

Roxburgh. 

Lauderdale, 

March, 

Pitsligo, 

Kinnoul, 

Marchmont, 

Forbes, 

Kirkcudbright, 

Loudon, 

Seafield, 

Salton, 

Eraser, 

MAROUISSES. 

Dumfries, 

Hyndford, 

Gray, 

Bargenv, 

Stirling, 

Cromarty, 

Ochiltree, 

Banff,  ' 

Tweeddale, 

Elgin, 

Stair, 

Cathcart, 

Elibank, 

Lothian, 

Traquair, 

Roseberry, 

Mordington, 

Halkerton, 

Annandale. 

Ancrum, 

Glasgow, 

Semple, 

Belhaven, 

Wemyss, 

Portmore, 

Elphinston, 

Abercromby, 

EARLS. 

Dalhousie, 

Bute, 

Oliphant, 

Rollo, 

Findlater, 

Hopetoun, 

Eraser  of  Lo vat. 

,  Colvil, 

Crawford, 

Leven, 

Deloraine, 

Borthwick, 

Ruthven, 

Errol, 

Dysart, 

Hay. 

Ross, 

Rutherford, 

Sutherland, 

Selkirk, 

Somerville, 

Ballenden, 

Monteith, 

Northesk, 

VISCOUNTS. 

Torphichen, 

Newark, 

Rothes, 

Kincardine, 

Falkland, 

Spyuie, 

Eyemouth, 

Morton, 

Balcarras, 

Dunbar, 

Lindores, 

Kinnaird, 

Buchan. 

Forfar, 

Stormont, 

Balmerino, 

Glassford.            , 

"  But  they  dare  not  presume  to  transmit  this  to  your  Lordships  as  a  list  of  the 
peerage  of  Scotland,  without  observing  two  things :  First,  That  as  they  have,  in  exa- 
mining the  records,  met  with  many  ancient  peerages,  such  as  Lyle,  Holyroodhouse, 
Monypenny,  Inverkeithing,  and  others,  not  entered  in  the  said  roll  or  list  that  was 
called  over  in  the  last  Parliament  of  Scotland ;  nay,  some  of  them  not  appearing 
to  have  sat  or  voted  for  a  century;  as  it  is  impossible  for  them  to  discover,  so  as  to 
be  able  to  report  to  your  Lordships  with  any  certainty,  whether  any,  or  which  of 
these  peerages  may  be  extinct,  or  joined  with  other  titles  in  the  same  person  ;  as 
if  any  person  should  hereafter  appear,  and  vouch  a  sufficient  right  to  any  of  those 
peerages,  your  Lordships  would  admit  them,  as  you  did  in  the  cases  above  men- 
tioned of  Somerville  and  Colvil  of  Culross:  And  as  there  may  be  several  ancient 
peerages  that  do  not  appear  in  the  said  roll  or  list,  now  and  for  many  years  past, 
conjoined  with  higher  dignities  in  the  same  person,  which  may  hereafter  separate, 
as  the  limitations  of  the  succession  of  the  several  peerages  may  be  different:  So  the 
above  roll  cannot  be  looked  upon  as  a  complete  list,  such  as  should  exclude  any 
further  claims  to  ancient  peerages  duly  to  be  made  and  vouched. 

"  The  second  observation  they  humbly  make,  is,  that  though  in  drawing  out  the 
above  roll  or  list  they  have  left  out  such  of  the  peers,  contained  in  the  list  referred 
to  in  the  Appendix,  as  they  were  warranted  to  leave  out  by  legal  evidence,  yet 
they  have  reason,  from  examining  the  records,  to  think,  that  several  of  the 
peerages  in  the  above  roll  or  list  are  extinct,  or  so  joined  with  other  titles  in  the 
same  person,  as  not  to  be  again  separable  from  them;  though,  not  having  absolute 
certainty  or  legal  evidence  of  this,  they  could  not  take  upon  them  to  leave  those 
peerages  out  of  the  roll  or  list  which  your  Lordships  directed  them  to  lay  before 
the  house :  But,  as  they  take   it  to  be  their  duty  to  give  your  Lordships  all  the 

Vol.  n.  4  C 


i76  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

light  they  are  able,  under  the  proper  guards,  to  prevent  your  Lordships  from  being 
misled,  by  the  inforntiiition  they  may  ofler,  so  far  as  it  is  imperfect,  they  take  the  li- 
berty, humbly  to  lay  before  your  Lordships  such  observations,  as  leave  it  doubtful, 
whether  the  persons  claiming  some  of  the  said  peerages  have  sufficient  right  there- 
to, (ir,  as  lead  them  to  think,  that  several  particular  peerages  in  the  above-written 
roll  or  list  are  extinct,  or  joined  in  the  same  person  with  other  peerages,  not  again 
to  be  separated :  And  they  have  annexed  in  the  Appendix,  No.  IL  copies  of  the 
words  of  limitation  hi  the  several  patents  to  which  the  observations  refer. 

"  MoNTEiTH.  I.  Then,  they  observe,  That  there  is  in  the  record  of  the  Great 
Seal,  in  the  Lord  Register's  keeping,  a  patent  by  King  Charles  L  granting  the  dig- 
nity of  Earl  of  Monteith  and  Strathern,  anno  1631,  to  William  Earl  of  Strathern, 
and  to  his  heirs-male,  and  of  tailzie ;  that  they  find  no  charter  altering  this  limi- 
tation ;  that  the  Earl  of  Monteith  appears  to  have  sat  in  the  Parliament  of  Scot- 
land anm  1693,  but  not  since  that  time  ;  and  that  no  person  has,  by  himself  or 
proxy,  or  by  a  signed  list,  attempted  to  give  any  vote  since  the  Union  as  Earl  of 
Monteith,  in  any  election  of  a  peer,  or  peers,  to  sit  in  Parliament;  but  whether 
any  heirs-male,  or  of  tailzie,  of  the  said  William  Earl  of  Strathern  or  Monteith, 
do  now  exist,  or  whether  the  limitation  of  the  succession  of  that  peerage  was  al- 
tered by  any  new  patent,  or  by  any  charter  on  the  resignation  of  the  original 
patentee,  or  his  succesors,  they  cannot  discover. 

"  Ancrum.  2.  They  observe,  That  there  is  in  the  record  of  the  Great  Seal,  in  the 
Lord  Register's  keeping,  a  patent  atwo  1633,  granting  to  Sir  Robert  Ker,  Knight, 
and  to  the  heirs-male  of  the  marriage  betwixt  him  and  Lady  Anne  Stanley,  only 
daughter  to  the  Earl  of  Derby,  his  second  wife  ;  which  failing,  to  the  heirs-male 
of  the  said  Robert  Ker,  and  their  heirs-male  for  ever,  the  title  ot  Earl  of  Ancrum  : 
By  the  rolls  of  Parliament  it  appears  that  the  Earl  of  Ancrum  sat  in  the  Parlia- 
ment 1681  ;  but  as  no  one  has  sat  in  Parliament  since  that  time,  or  claimed  a 
vote  at  any  election  since  the  Union  under  that  title  ;  and,  as  by  the  said  patent 
It  appears,  that,  failing  heirs-male  of  that  marriage,  the  honours  of  Ancrum  were 
,10  descend  to  the  heirs-male  of  Sir  Robert,  the  first  patentee,  whose  eldest  son 
appears,  by  the  same  patent,  to  have  obtained  the  honours  of  Earl  of  Lothian,  if 
there  is  no  male  descendant  of  the  said  Robert's  second  marriage,  the  title  of  An- 
crum is,  so  far  as  they  can  discover,  joined  with  that  of  Lothian,  in  the  present 
Marquis  of  Lothian. 

"  Forfar.  3.  They  observe.  That  there  is  in  the  record  of  the  Great  Seal,  in 
the  Lord  Register's  keeping,  a  patent  anno  1661,  granting  to  Archibald  Douglas, 
and  his  heirs-male  the  title  of  Earl  of  Forfar.  The  last  Earl  of  Forfar  died  of  the 
wounds  he  received  at  the  battle  near  Dumblane  anno  1715  :  No  one  has  at- 
tempted to  vote  under  this  title  since  his  death  ;  and  as,  by  the  records  in  Chan- 
cery, it  appears  that  the  Duke  of  Douglas  is  served  and  retoured  nearest  heir-male 
to  the  said  deceased  Earl,  this  peerage,  so  far  as  they  can  discover,  is  at  present  in 
the  Duke  of  Douglas. 

"  Dumbarton.  4.  That  the  only  patent  that  appears  of  the  honours  of  Earl  of 
Dumbarton  is  in  the  records  of  the  Great  Seal,  and  is  dated  in  the  1675,  and 
limits  the  descent  to  the  heirs-male  of  the  body  of  Lord  George  Douglas,  the  first 
patentee  ;  so  that  if  there  are  no  heirs-male  of  his  body  existing,  and  if  no  altera- 
tion has  been  made  of  this  limitation,  by  some  later  charter  which  does  not  appear, 
the  title  is  extinct. 

"  Melvill.  5.  That  the  title  of  Earl  of  Melvill  is,  by  the  original  grant  thereof,. 
anno  1690,  to  be  found  in  the  register  of  the  Great  Seal  in  the  Chancery  Office, 
limited  to  the  patentee  and  the  heirs-male  of  his  body  :  That  the  present  Earl  of 
Leven  to  whom,  and  the  heirs-male  of  his  body,  the  honours  of  Leven  are  limited, 
is  the  heir-male  of  the  body  of  the  patentee  of  the  honours  of  Melvill ;  so  that  the 
honours  of  Leven  and  Melvill  must  remain  conjoined  in  the  same  person,  so  long 
as  there  shall  be  male  descendants  of  the  body  of  the  present  earl. 

"  RuGLEN.  6.  That  by  the  only  patent  of  the  honours  of  Ruglen,  which  appears, 
in  the  records  of  the  Great  Seal  anno  1697,  in  the  Chancery  Office,  the  limitation 
is  to  Lord  John  Hamilton,  the  present  Earl,  and  to  the  heirs-male  of  his  body; 
which  faihng,  to  the  heirs  of  his  body  whatsoever  ;  that,  by  the  decease  of  the  late 
Charles  Earl  of  Selkirk  without  heirs-male  of  his  body,  the  title  of  Selkirk  is  now 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  1 7  7 

devolved,  by  an  express  limitation  in  the  original  charter  of  the  honour  of  Selkirk, 
anno  1688,  in  the  records  of  the  Great  Seal  in  the  Chancery  Office,  on  the  said 
John  Earl  of  Ruglen,  and  will  remain  conjoined  with  the  title  of  Ruglen  so  long- 
as  there  shall  remain  male  heirs  of  the  body  of  the  present  earl  ;  but  as,  on  failure 
of  such  males,  the  honours  of  Selkuk  are  further  limited  to  the  fourth,  fifth,  and 
remaining  sons  of  William  Duke  of  Hamilton,  and  the  heirs-male  of  their  body, 
whereas  the  honours  of  Ruglen  are  descendible  to  the  heirs  whatsoever  of  the 
present  earl's  body,  those  titles  may  hereafter  separate. 

"  FiNDLATER  and  Seafield.  7.  That  by  thepatent  of  the  title  of  Earl  of  Sea- 
field,  in  the  record  of  the  Great  Seal  anno  1701,  in  the  Chancery  Office,  the  title 
is  granted  to  the  patentee,  whilst  his  father  the  Earl  of  Findlater  was  living,  and  to 
the  heirs-male  of  his  body  ;  which  failing,  to  his  other  heirs  of  taihie  succeeding  to 
him  in  his  lands,  baronies,  and  estates ;  and  by  the  patent  of  the  honours  of  Find- 
later  anno  1638,  in  the  record  of  the  Great  Seal  in  the  keeping  of  the  Lord  Re- 
gister, the  Umitation  is  to  the  heirs-male  of  the  body  of  the  patentee  succeeding 
to  him  in  his  proper  estate  of  Findlater  and  Deskford.  These  titles  are  at  present 
joined  in  the  Earl  of  Findlater  and  Seafield ;  but  whether  they  may  not  hereafter 
separate,  will  depend  on  the  form  of  the  settlement  of  the  succession  in  the  estates 
of  Findlater  and  Deskfo?d,  the  patrimony  of  the  first  Earl  of  Findlater,  to  which 
his  patent  refers,  and  on  the  form  of  the  settlement  made  by  the  first  Earl  of  Sea- 
field,  of  his  lands,  baronies,  and  estate. 

"  OxENFORD.  8.  That  the  patent  creating  the  Viscount  of  Oxenford,  appears  in  the 
records  of  the  Great  Seal,  in  the  keeping  of  the  Lord  Register,  anno  165 1,  and  is 
limited  to  the  patentee's  heirs-male  of  tailzie  and  provision  whatsoever  ;  it  appears 
by  the  rolls  of  Parliament,  that  the  last  time  any  person  sat  or  voted,  in  virtue  ot 
that  title,  was  in  the  Convention  of  Estates  1689  ;  since  that  time  it  does  not 
appear  that  any  one,  on  this  title,  claimed  a  vote  in  Parliament,  or  at  elections, 
since  the  Union,  until  the  election  1733,  when  two  ditferent  persons,  viz.  Robert 
Maitland  and  James  M'Gill,  claimed  the  title,  and  gave  in  lists ;  they  believe  that 
one  of  these  claimants,  James  M'Gill,  presented  a  petition  to  his  majesty,  claiming 
that  peerage  as  his  right ;  and  that  this  petition  having  been  referred  to  your  Lord- 
ships, the  petitioner  was  heard  thereupon,  and  that  your  Lordships  came  to  a  reso- 
lution thereon  in  the  year  1735,  to  which  they  beg  leave  to  refer. 

"  Teviot.  9.  That  the  patent  creating  Sir  Thomas  Livingston  Viscount  of  Te- 
viot,  appears  in  the  records  of  the  GreatSeal  in  tlie  Chancery  Office,  anno  1696,  limit- 
ing the  honours  to  the  heirs-male  of  the  patentee's  body  ;  the  said  viscount  sat  in 
the  ParHament  1704,  but  not  since;  nor  has  a^ny  one  in  right  of  that  peerage 
claimed  a  vote  at  any  election  since  the  Union ;  and  if  there  are  no  heirs-male  of 
his  body,  the  title  is  extinct. 

"  Duplin.  10.  That  the  patent  creating  Thomas  Hay  Viscovmt  of  Duplin, 
appears  in  the  records  of  the  Great  Seal  in  the  C'.iancery  Office  anna  1697,  limit- 
ing the  honours  to  the  heirs-male  of  his  body  ;  which  faihng,  to  his  other  heirs  of 
tailzie  ;  and,  as  there  appears  in  the  same  records,  anno  1704,  a  charter  upon  the 
resignation  of  William  Earl  of  Kinnoul,  of  the  honours  of  Earl  of  Kinnoul,  to  the 
said  William  during  his  life;  and  failing  of  him  by  decease,  to  Thomas  Viscount 
of  Duplin,  and  the  heirs-male  of  his  body  ;  which  failing,  to  his  heirs  of  tailzie 
and  provision,  succeeding  to  him  in  his  lands  and  baronies  of  Duplin  ;  under 
which  grant  the  honours  of  Kinnoul  have  been  enjoyed  by  the  Viscount  of  Dup- 
lin ;  these  honours  are  now  conjoined  in  the  same  person,  and  seem  to  be  inse- 
parable. 

"  Ochiltree,  ii.  That  there  appears  no  patent,  so  far  as  can  be  discovered  on 
record,  creating  the  title  of  Lord  Ochiltree,  nor  has  any  person  sat  in  Parliament 
under  that  title  since  the  year  161 7,  nor  claimed  a  vote  at  any  election  since  the 
Union  in  right  thereof  ;  but  whether  some  person  may  not  appear,  and  make 
good  a  claim  thereto,  they  cannot  say. 

"  BoRTHwicK..  12.  That  there  appears  no  patent  in  the  records  constituting  the 
peerage  of  Lord  Borthwick,  nor  does  any  person  appear  to  have  sat  in  Parliament 
under  that  title  later  than  the  year  1662.  In  the  1734,  Henry  Borthwick, 
at  the  general  election  of  sixteen  peers  for  this  present  Parliament,  claimed  his 
vote  as  Lord  Borthwick.  and  gave  in  a  list,  as  he  has  done  at  the  several  elections 
of  single  peers  since  the  said  election.     In  1734  the  Earl  of  Marchmont  protested. 


i^S  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

That  no  person  might  be  admitted  to  vote  as  pretending  right  to  peerages  by  the 
;itles  ot"  Borthwick,  Kirkcudbright,  or  Rutherford  ;  but  no  other  competitor  has 
appeared  to  claim  the  honour  of  Borthwick  ;  but  whether  the  right  of  the  said 
Henry  Borthwick,  to  the  title  of  Borthwick,  is  good,  they  cannot  say. 

•'  Spynie.  13.  That  the  patent  creating  Lord  Spynie  has  not  hitherto  been 
found  in  the  records,  nor  has  any  person  sat  m  Parliament  under  that  title  since 
the  year  1669,  neither  has  any  person  claimed  a  vote  in  virtue  thereof  at 
any  election  since  the  Union ;  but  whether  this  peerage  is  extinct,  they  cannot 
suy. 

"  Cardross.  14.  That  the  patent  creating  Lord  Cardross  has  not  hitherto  been 
found  ;  that  the  present  Earl  of  Buchan  sat  in  Parliament,  anno  1695,  as  Lord 
Cardross  :  That  in  the  1698  the  Lord  Cardross  claimed  the  honours  of  Earl  of 
Huchan,  and  by  a  resolution  of  Parhament  was  admitted  to  sit  and  vote  as  Earl  of 
Buchan  ;  that  these  honours  are  thus  joined  in  the  same  person  ;  but  whether 
they  must  remain  so  forever,  or  may  separate,  they  cannot  say  as  the  limitation  of 
the  peerage  of  Cardross  does  not  appear. 

"  Jedburgh.  15.  That  the  latest  charter  of  the  honours  of  Lord  Jedburgh  that 
has  hitherto  been  found,  is  in  the  records  of  the  Great  Seal  in  the  year  1670,  in 
the  Lord  Register's  keeping,  which,  on  failure  of  Robert  Ker  of  Fernihirst,  and 
the  heirs-male  of  his  body,  hmits  the  honours  to  William,  Master  of  Newbattle, 
■md  the  heirs-male  of  his  body  ;  which  failing,  to  the  said  Master's  nearest  heirs- 
inale  whatsoever  ;  that  this  Wilham,  Master  of  Newbottle,  succeeded  to  the  honours 
of  Jedburgh,  and  on  that  title  voted  in  Parliament  anno  1702,  where  his  father 
the  Marquis  of  Lothian  also  sat  and  voted  as  Marquis  of  Lothian,  and  upon  his 
father's  decease  succeeded  to  the  honours  of  Lothian  ;  and  therefore,  if  a  judgment 
were  to  be  formed  on  what  thus  appears,  it  would  be  natural  to  conclude  that  the 
honours  of  Jedburgh  and  Lothian  are  conjoined  in  the  same  person  ;  but  as  it  ap- 
pears that  the  present  Marquis  of  Lothian,  in  his  father's  lifetime,  voted,  an?io  1712, 
at  the  election  of  a  peer  to  sit  in  Parliament,  in  the  room  of  the  Earl  Marischal 
vhen  deceased,  under  the  character  of  Lord  Jedburgh,  it  is  not  impossible  that  the 
i'amily  of  Lothian  may  be  possessed  of  some  settlement  of  this  peerage  of  Jedburgh, 
different  from  what  hitherto  has  been  found  in  the  records. 

"  Maderiy.  16.  That  they  have  not  found  the  patent  creating  the  Lord  Ma- 
derty  in  the  records ;  that  the  Lord  Maderty  appears  by  the  rolls  of  Parliament 
to  have  sat  and  voted  anno  1669;  that  no  person  appears  to  have  sat  in  Parlia- 
ment, or  to  have  claimed  a  vote  at  any  general  or  particular  election  of  a  peer  or 
peers,  after  the  Union  under  that  title ;  but  whether  the  title  is  extinct,  or  joined 
with  some  other  peerage  in  the  same  person,  they  cannot  take  upon  them  to 
say. 

"  Cupar.  17.  That  there  appears  in  the  records  of  the  Great  Seal,  in  the  Lord 
Register's  keeping,  the  charter  o:'  erection  of  the  Lordship  of  Cupar  anno  1607, 
in  favour  of  James  Elphinston,  lawful  son  of  the  Lord  Balmerino,  and  the  heirs- 
male  of  his  body  ;  which  failing,  to  his  father,  and  his  heirs-male,  and  of  tailzie, 
contained  in  his  infeftments  of  the  barony  of  Balumby  ;  it  appears  from  the  rolls 
of  Parliament,  that  no  person  has  sat  or  voted  in  Parliament  as  Lord  Cupar  since 
the  year  1662 ;  neither  has  any  one  claimed  a  vote  under  that  title,  at  any  elec- 
tion since  the  Union  ;  so  that  if  there  are  no  heirs-male  of  the  body  of  the  Lord 
Cupar  the  patentee,  it  is  likely  that  peerage  is  now  joined  with  that  of  Balmeri- 
no, in  the  same  person,  not  to  be  hereafter  separated. 

"  Cramond.  18.  That  in  the  records  of  the  Great  seal,  in  the  keeping  of  the 
Lord  Register,  there  appears  a  patent,  anno  1628,  creating  Elizabeth,  the  wife  of 
Sir  Thomas  Richardson,  Lord  Chief  Justice  of  the  Court  of  Common  Pleas,  during 
all  the  days  of  her  life,  Baroness  of  Cramond;  and,  after  her  decease,  granting  the 
same  honours  to  Sir  Thomas  Richardson,  the  son  of  the  said  Lord  Chief  Justice, 
and  his  heirs-male  ;  which  failing,  to  the  heirs-male  of  the  body  of  the  said  Lord 
Chief  Justice,  with  right  to  vote  in  Parliament,  if  personally  present,  and  not 
otherwise  ;  that  in  examining  the  rolls  of  Parliament,  and  the  proceedings  at  all 
the  elections  since  the  Union,  it  does  not  appear  that  any  person  ever  sat  or  voted, 
as  Lord  Cramond,  or  that  any  one  offered  to  vote  at  any  election  since  the  Union,. 
3 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS, 


179 


under  that  title  :  but,  as  the  descendants  of  the  said  Sir  Thomas  Richardson,  if  any 
were,  had  probably  tlieir  residence  in  England,  their  not  having  claimed  hitherto 
can  be  no  objection  to  their  title,  if  they  can  verify  their  right  to  it. 

"  Kirkcudbright.  19.  In  the  records  of  the  Great  Seal,  m  the  keeping  of  the 
Lord  Register,  there  appears  a  patent,  creating  Sir  Robert  M'Lellan,  Lord  Kirkcud- 
bright, nnno  1633,  and  granting  the  honours  to  liim  and  his  heirs-male,  carrying 
his  name  and  arms:  It  does  not  appear  tliat  ever  this  Lord  tLukcudbright,  or  any 
person  in  his  right,  sat  or  voted  in  Failiament ;  but  it  appears  f;om  searching  into 
the  proceedings  at  the  several  elections  of  peers  since  the  Union,  that,  anno  1 721, 
at  the  election  of  a  peer  to  serve  in  Parliament,  in  the  room  of  the  then  deceased 
Marquis  of  Annaadale,  James  M'Lellan  of  Auchlean,  offered  his  vote  as  Lord  Kirk- 
cudbright ;  but  that  vote  appears  to  have  been  protested  against,  as  being  given  by 
a  person  who  had  not  made  good  his  title  to  that  peerage.  In  the  year  17^4,  at 
the  general  election  of  sixieen  peers,  to  serve  in  the  present  Parliament,  after  the 
the  decease  of  the  said  James,  without  heirs-male  of  his  body,  William  M'Lellan 
voted  as  Lord  Kirkcudbright,  and  was  protested  against  by  James  M'Lellan,  who 
laid  claim  to  that  peerage,  and  voted  in  right  thereof:  The  said  William  has  vot- 
ed since  that  time  at  all  the  elections  of  single  peers,  without  any  objection;  but 
whether  his  right  so  to  do  is  well  founded,  they  cannot  take  upon  them  to  say. 

"  Bargeny.  20.  That  the  patent  of  the  Lord  Bargeny  has  not  been  met  with  in 
the  records.  By  the  proceedings  in  a  cause  wnich  lately  depended  before  the 
Court  of  Session,  and  which  was  brought  by  appeal  before  your  Lordships,  touching 
the  succession  to  the  estate  of  Bargeny,  it  appears  that  there  is  no  heir-male  exist- 
ing of  the  body  of  John  Lord  Bargeny,  who,  anno  i68b,  made  the  settlement  of 
his  estate,  on  which  that  question  depended  ;  and  no  person  has,  at  any  election, 
since  the  death  of  the  last  lord,  claimed  a  vote  in  right  of  that  peerage  ;  but  as 
they  cannot  discover  from  the  records  the  limitation  of  that  dignity,  they  cannot 
take  upon  them  to  say,  whether  it  is  extinct  or  not. 

"  Abercromby.  21.'  That  there  appears  in  the  records  of  the  Great  Seal,  in  the 
Chancery  OiRce,  a  patent,  (inno  1647,  granting  the  dignity  of  Lord  Abercromby 
to  Sir  James  Sandilands,  and  the  heirs-male  of  his  body  ;  but  it  does  not  appear 
that  either  the  patentee,  or  any  successor  of  his  in  that  right,  ever  sat  or  voted  in 
Parliament  ;  neither  has  any  one  offered  to  vote  in  right  of  that  peerage  at  any 
election,  general  or  particular,  since  the  Union. 

"  Rutherford.  11.  That  in  the  records  of  the  Great  Seal,  in  the  keeping  of  the 
Lord  Register,  anno  1661,  there  appears  a  patent,  granting  the  dignity  of  Lord 
Rutherford  to  Andrew  Rutherford,  and  the  heirs-male  of  his  body  ;  which  failing, 
to  whatsoever  person  or  persons  he  should,  by  any  writing  under  his  hand,  even 
on  death-bed,  appoint  to  succeed  him.  The  Lord  Rutherford  appears  by  the  rolls 
of  Parhament  to  have  sat  or  voted  in  the  1698,  and  Robert  Lord  Rutherford  appears 
to  have  voted  at  the  election  of  sixteen  peers  anno  1715  ;  and  in  the  year  1 733  at  the 
election  of  a  peer,  in  room  of  the  Earl  of  Sutherland,  then  deceased,  George  Durie 
of  Grange  appeared  and  voted  as  Lord  Rutherford,  without  any  objection.  At 
the  general  election  the  year  following,  1734,  the  same  person  claimed  his  vote; 
but  he  was  protested  against  by  Captain  John  Rutherford,  who  laid  claim  to  the 
honours  of  Rutherford,  and  gave  m  to  the  clerks  his  list  in  virtue  thereof;  against 
which  the  said  George  Dury  in  his  turn  protested  ;  and  in  the  election,  anno  1738, 
of  a  peer  to  serve  in  Parhament  in  the  room  of  the  late  Earl  of  Morton,  these  two 
claimants  renewed  their  protestations  against  each  other,  and  tendered  severally 
their  votes ;  but  whether  any,  or  which  of  them,  has  a  sufficient  right  to  that 
peerage,  they  cannot  say. 

"  Newark.  23.  That  the  patent  creating  David  Leslie  Lord  Newark,  appears  in 
the  records  of  the  Great  Seal,  in  the  keeping  of  the  Lord  Register,  anno  1661, 
limiting  the  descent  to  the  heirs-male  of  his  body  ;  it  does  not  appear  by  the  rolls 
of  Parliament  that  any  one  has  sat  or  voted  under  that  title  since  the  year  1690; 
neither  has  any  one  in  right  of  that  peerage  offered  a  vote  at  any  election  since  the 
Union  ;  but  whether  it  is  extinct,  by  reason  of  failure  of  heirs-male  of  the  body  of 
the  patentee,  they  cannot  take  upon  them  to  say. 

"  Eymouth.  24.  That  by  a  patent  in  the  records  of  the  Great  Seal,  in  he 
Chancerv  OfBce,  anno   1682,  the   dignity  of  Lord  Eymouth  is   granted  to  John 

Vol.  il.  4  D 


i8o  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

Churchill,  afterwards  Duke  of  Marlborough,  and  the  heirs-male  of  his  body:  Thar 
the  iunuation  ot  this  peerage  does  not  appear  trom  the  .ec.jids  in  Scotland  to  have 
been  altered,  so  as  to  be  made  descendible  in  he  .ame  clianuel  with  his  other  ho- 
nours; and  if  no  act  of  the  crown,  before  the  Uu,on,  or  ot  ihe  Pailiament  of  Great 
Britain  since,  has  interponed,  that  title  seems  to  be  extinct  by  the  fadure  of  heirs- 
male  of  the  body  of  the  patentee. 

"  Glassford.  25.  That  no  patent  of  the  honours  of  Glassford  has  been  found  on 
record,  excepting  one  in  the  year  1685,  '"  '^he  records  of  the  Great  Seal,  in  the 
Chancery  Oltice,  which  grants  that  dignity  to  Francis  Abercromby  of  Fitternier, 
during  all  the  days  of  his  life.  This  lord  does  not  appear  to  have  ever  sat  in  Par- 
liament; and  if  no  different  patent  has  been  obtained  of  this  title,  from  that  which 
appears  in  the  records,  it  died  with  him. 

"  Having,  in  these  observations,  laid  before  your  lordships  every  matter  that  has 
occurred  to  them,  on  such  examination  of  the  records,  as  the  nature  of  the  work, 
the  condition  of  the  records,  and  the  course  of  the  business  of  the  court  would  per- 
mit, fit  to  create  an  opinion,  that  the  several  peerages,  to  which  the  obseiValions 
refer,  may  be  either  determnied  or  conjoined  in  the  same  person,  with  other  titles 
of  honour,  in  some  cases  separable,  in  others  not;  or  to  show,  that  though  the  titles 
may  be  subsisting,  yet  the  right  thereto  is  controverted,  they  humbly  certify  to 
your  lordships,  that  they  have  not  hitherto  discovered  from  the  records  any  reason 
to  doubt,  that  all  and  every  the  other  peerages,  in  the  roll  or  list  above  ingrossed, 
not  mentioned  in  these  observations,  are  still  subsisting  and  continuing  ;  though 
objections  may  lie  against  some  of  them,  not  hitherto  discovered,  and  that  no  one, 
so  far  as  they  can  discover,  has  hitherto  controverted  the  right  of  the  present  pos- 
sessors, by  setting  up  a  claim  to  any  of  these  peerages. 

"  But  before  they  leave  this  article,  they  must  observe  to  your  lordships,  that 
though  the  list  of  the  peers,  first  above  described,  (a  copy  whereof  is  in  the  Ap- 
pendix, p.  183.  No.  I.)  was  what  the  clerks  looked  upon  as  of  authority  ;  yet,  in 
copying  over  rolls  or  lists,  to  be  made  use  of  at  several  elections  since  the  Union, 
they  have  added,  but  by  what  authority '  does  not  appear,  two  peerages,  viz.  that 
of  the  Earl  of  Solway,  and  that  of  the  Lord  Dingwall.  The  question  concerning  the 
last  is  of  little  importance,  because  the  Duke  of  Orrnond,  who  voted  as  Lord  Ding- 
wall, by  proxy,  at  the  election  of  sixteen  peers,  anno  1710,  stands  attainted  of  high 
treason,  by  an  act  of  the  first  year  of  his  late  Majesty  King  George  L  But  as  to  the 
first,  they  take  it  to  be  their  duty  to  state  the  matter  to  your  Lordships,  so  far  as  it  ap- 
pears to  them  ;  tobserving,  that  the  peerage  of  Solway  does  not  stand  in  the  before- 
mentioned  roll  or  list,  though  it  appears  to  have  been  interlined  in  some  old  copies 
taken  thereof,  and  entered  between  the  title  of  Deloraine,  and  that  of  Hay,  in  the 
rolls  that  have  been  made  use  of  at  the  elections  since  the  Union  :  They  made 
what  enquiry  they  were  able  into  the  cause,  why  it  did  not  stand  in  the  so  often 
mentioned  roll  or  list,  and  how  it  came  afterwards  to  be  added  ;  and  from  that  en- 
quiry an  obvious  reason  appears,  why  that  title  was  not  entered  on  the  roll;  to  wit, 
that  as  the  patentee,  because  of  his  nonage,  was  incapable  to  sit  and  vote,  so 
neither  had  any  one  taken  upon  him  to  present  his  patent  in  Parliament,  which 
was  usually  done,  and  an  entry  made  in  the  minutes  of  Parliament,  of  its  having 
been  so  done,  before  the  peerage  was  entered  on  the  rolls  of  Parliament ;  but  as 
this  was  omitted  to  be  done  in  the  last  Parliament  of  Scotland,  they  cannot  dis- 
cover by  what  authority  that  peerage  has,  since  the  Union,  been  added  to  the 
roll  of  peers  ;  nevertheless,  since  it  has  been  so  added,  they  presume  humbly  to 
lay  before  your  Lordships  what  appears  to  them  from  the  records  concerning  it. 
The  patent  appears  in  the  records  of  the  Great  Seal,  a/mo  1706,  and  grants  the 
honours  of  Earl  of  Solway  to  Lord  Charles  Douglas,  now  Duke  of  Queensberry, 
and  the  heirs-male  of  his  body  ;  which  failing,  to  Lord  George  Douglas,  third  son 
of  the  late  Duke  of  Qiieensberry,  and  the  heirs-male  of  his  body  ;  which  failing, 
to  any  other  son  to  be  begotten  by  the  said  late  Duke  of  Queensberry,  not  suc- 
ceeding to  the  honours  of  Qiieensberry,  and  the  heirs-male  of  such  son's  body. 
Now,  as  the  last  patent  of  the  honours  of  the  Dukedom  of  Queensberry,  bearing 
the  same  date  with  the  patent  of  Solway,  viz.  17th  June  1706,  limits  the  succes- 
sion of  the  dignity  to  the  heirs  of  the  tailzie  ot  the  estate  ;  and  as,  by  the  tailzie 
of  the  estate,  which  is  recorded  in  the  register  of  tailzies,  the  estate  of  Qiieensberry. 
is  limited  to  the  present  duke,  and  the  heirs-male  of  his  body  ;  which  failing,  to 


EXTERIOR  ORNAIMENTS.  i&i 

the  said  Lord  George  Douglas,  and  the  heirs-male  of  his  body  ;  which  also  foiling. 
to  any  otiier  son  to  be  begotten  ot  the  said  late  Duke,  ajid  the  henb-male  ot  the 
body  of  such  son  ;  and  as  there  is  no  maJe  issue  of  the  body  of  the  said  Duke  of 
Queensberry  existing,  except  the  present  duke  and  his  suns,  the  title  ot  Sulway 
can  never  subsist  separate  from  that  of  Qlleen^berry  :  Bui,  as  they  l)elieve,  that 
in  certain  proceedings  before  your  Lordships,  in  the  )ear  1720,  the  present  Duke 
of  Queensberry  disclaimed  the  peerage  of  Solway,  they  must  humbly  leave  it  uith 
your  Lordships,  whether  the  title  of  Soiway  is  a  subsisting  peerage  at  all  ;  it  it  is 
subsisting,  it  would  seem  to  be  joined  with  that  of  Qiieensberry. 

"  As  to  the  othur  part  of  your  Lordships'  order,  which  requues  the  Lords  of  Ses- 
sion to  state  in  the  roll  or  list  to  be  laid  before  your  Lordships,  the  particular  limi- 
tations of  the  peerages,  so  far  as  they  shall  be  able,  they  must,  in  place  of  giving 
your  Lordships  the  satisfaction  you  expected,  and  that  they  wished  to  give,  content 
themselves  with  laying  before  your  Lordships  the  following  remarks  ;  which  will 
show,  not  only  that  they  are  not  able,  but  also  why  the\  are  not  able  to  an- 
swer your  Lordships'  expectation. 

"  First  then,  The>  take  the  liberty  to  remark,  that  they  cannot  discover  in  the 
records  any  patent  of  honour  creating  a  peerage,  earlier  than  the  reign  of  king  James 
VI.  Before  that  time,  titles  of  honour  and  dignity  were  created  by  erecting  lands 
into  earldoms  and  lordships,  and  probably  by  some  other  method  that  cannot 
now,  in  matters  so  ancient,  be  with  any  certainty  discovered  :  For  a  great  many 
noble  families  appear,  from  the  rolls  of  Parliament,  to  have  sat  and  voted  in  Par- 
liament as  lords  of  Parliament,  though  no  constitution  of  the  peerage,  or  title  of 
honour  under  which  they  sat,  can  be  now  found  in  the  records :  But  as  the  con- 
stitution in  most  ancient  cases  does  not  appear,  and  the  chiet  evidence  ot  the  titles 
being  hereditary  is  the  successor's  regularly  possessing  the  predecessor's  rank  in 
Parliament,  it  is  not  possible,  without  hearing  the  allegations  that  may  be  made, 
and  examining  the  evidence  that  may  be  brought  by  contending  parties,  to  form  any 
judgment  of  the  limitations  of  such  ancient  peerages.  As  there  is  not,  so  far  as 
they  know,  any  maxim  hitherto  established  in  the  law  of  Scotland,  that  can  be  ap- 
plied universally  to  determine  the  descent  of  peerages,  where  the  original  consti- 
tution, or  new  grants  upon  resignation  do  not  appear ;  and  ot  the  difficulty  that 
occurs  in  settling  such  questions,  they  lately  had  an  instance  in  the  case  of  the 
peerage  of  the  Lord  B'raser  of  Lovat,  v\hich  is  undoubtedly  subsisting  ;  the  last 
lord,  who  sat  in  the  Parliament  1695,  dying  without  male  issue,  his  eldest  daughter, 
and  after  her  death,  her  eldest  son,  assumed  the  title,  having  obtained  before  the 
Court  of  Session,  in  absence  of  the  heir-male,  a  decreet,  declaring  their  right  thereto  ; 
and,  on  the  other  hand,  his  nearest  heir-male  claimed  it,  insisting  that  the  honours 
were  descendible  to  heirs-male  ;  and  brought  his  action  before  the  Court  of  Session, 
to  have  it  so  found  and  declared,  and  to  reduce  and  set  aside  the  foresaid  judg- 
ment by  default :  The  court,  where  actions  of  the  same  kind  had  been  thought 
competent,  and  as  such  sustained  before  the  Union,  proceeded  to  hear  the  cause  ; 
and  the  parties  having  produced  of  either  side  all  the  documents  they  could,  and 
having  been  fully  heard  therecm,  the  Court  reduced  and  set  aside  the  foresaid  de- 
creet in  absence,  and  found  the  titlein  question  descendible  to  heirs-male;  and  the 
defender  has  hitherto  acquiesced.  But  whether  this  judgment  is  of  sufficient  au- 
thority, they  humbly  submit  to  your  Lordships;  having  made  mention  of  it  chiefly 
to  show,  that  though,  when  the  parties  interested  join  issue,  and  furnish  all  the  light 
in  their  power  towards  the  determination  of  the  cause,  the  Court  must  give  their 
opinion,  yet,  where  no  party  that  may  be  interested  is  bound  to  appear,  and  to 
produce  or  point  out  in  the  records,  so  far  as  they  may  be  found  there,  the  docu- 
ments that  are  necessary  to  instruct  their  claim,  it  is  next  to  impossible  for  any 
court,  or  indeed  for  human  industry,  to  make  up  a  state  of  the  interests  of  so  many 
persons  as  fall  under  this  observation,  with  any  tolerable  certainty. 

2.dly,  They  presume  humbly  to  inform  your  Lordships,  that  through  various  ac- 
cidents, the  state  of  their  records,  particularly  of  their  most  ancient,  is  imperfect ; 
for,  not  to  mention  other  misfortunes,  it  appears  by  an  examination,  to  be  found 
amongst  the  records  of  Parliament,  8th  January  1661,  that  of  the  registers,  which 
having  been  carried  to  England,  during  the  Usurpation  of  Cromwell,  were  bring- 
ing back  from  London,  after  the  Restoration,  by  sea,  85   hogsheads  were,  in  a 


iS2  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

storm,  shifted  out  of  the  frigate  (the  Eagle,)  into  another  vessel,  which  sunk  witii 
those  records  at  sea;  and  lo  hogsheads  more  of  the  records,  brouglil  doan  from 
London  at  that  time,  lie  still  uno])ened  in  the  general  register-house,  through  some 
neglect  of  the  officers  to  whose  charge  they  were  committed,  that  cannot  well  be 
accounted  for  ;  so  that,  upon  this  separate  account,  your  Lordships  will  perceive 
a  search  into  the  ancient  records  cannot  give  reasonable  satisfaction. 

"  ^dly,.  After  the  practice  of  creating  peerages  by  patent,  the  records,  till  of  late, 
have  been  so  carelessly  kept,  that  they  cannot  be  absolutely  depended  upon;  patents 
of  honour  have  passed  the  Great  Seal,  and  yet  copies  of  the  patents  so  passed  are 
not  to  be  met  with  in  the  Register  of  that  seal ;  and  of  this  the  patents  of  the  Lord 
Forrester,  anno  1651,  and  of  the  Earl  of  Breadalbune,  1682,  are  instances;  the 
first  of  these  was  duly  sealed  in  the  1651,  but  not  entered  in  the  register  till  the 
year  1684  ;  and  the  last  was  duly  sealed  in  the  1682,  but,  to  this  hour,  is  not 
entered  into  the  register;  besides  that  of  volume  57.  of  the  Register  of  the  Great 
Seal,  in  the  keeping  of  the  Lord  Keeper,  twelve  leaves  are  lost,  by  some  accident 
now  unknown ;  and  it  appears  from  the  minute-book,  that  the  patent  of  Bargeny, 
and  several  others,  were  passed  at  such  time ;  that  they  probably  may  have  been 
entered  in  some  of  those  leaves  that  are  lost. 

"  4?Z'/y,  They  presume  humbly  to  inform  your  Lordships,  that  it  was  a  practice 
very  prevalent  in  Scotland  for  peers  to  make  a  resignation  or  surrender  of  their  ho- 
nours, whether  originally  created  by  patent,  or  by  the  more  ancient  methods,  into 
tlie  hands  of  the  sovereign,  for  new  grants  of  those  honours  to  such  a  series  of  heirs 
as  they  intended  for  their  successors ;  and  the  new  grants  passed  sometimes  in  the 
form  of  patents  of  honour  only,  and  sometimes  in  the  form  of  charters  of  the 
estates,  containing  a  new  grant  of  the  limitation  of  the  honours.  Now,  where  this 
last  was  the  case,  it  must  be  attended  with  very  great  labour  and  expence  of  time, 
to  search  for  the  titles  of  honour  amongst  all  the  charters  of  lands. 

"  ^tbly.  The  practice  of  Scotland  went  still  farther  ;  and  it  was  usual  to  obtain 
grants  of  honours,  not  only  to  the  grantee  and  his  heirs-male,  and  of  tailzie,  refer- 
ring to  the  particular  entail  then  made,  but  also  to  his  heirs  of  tailzie  whom  he 
might  thereafter  appoint  to  succeed  him  in  his  estate,  and  even  to  any  person 
whom  he  should  name  to  succeed  him  in  his  honours  at  any  time  in  his  life,  or  up- 
on deathbed  :  Now,  as  it  is  impossible  to  trace  through  the  records  such  nomi- 
nations and  appointment,  which  in  some  cases  may  be  valid,  though  not  hitherto 
recorded,  your  Lordships  will  easily  see,  that  the  Lords  of  Session  are  not  able  to  give 
vour  Lordships  any  reasonable  satisfaction  touching  the  limitations  of  the  peerages 
that  are  still  continuing ;  and  your  Lordships  will  further  perceive  the  reason  why, 
in  the  foregoing  observations,  they  speak  so  doubtfully  of  the  continuance  of 
peerages,  which,  were  they  to  judge  only  on  what  appears  from  the  examination 
they  have  had  of  the  records,  they  should  not  doubt  to  report  to  be  extinct,  or  so 
conjoined  \nx.\\  other  titles  of  honour  as  not  to  be  again  separable. 

"  All  which  is  most  humbly  submitted, 

"  Dun.  Forbes,  I.  P.  D." 
"  Edinburgh,  I'jth  Feb.  1740.  i 


APPENDIX. 


No  I. 


ROLL  OF  THE  PEERS  OF  SCOTLAND,   PARLIAMENT  1706. 


DUKES 

EARLS                  VISCOUNTS 

LORDS 

Hamilton, 

Nithsdale, 

Balcarras, 

Kenmure, 

Balmerino, 

Buccleugh, 

Winton, 

Forfar, 

Arbuthnot, 

Blantyre, 

Lennox, 

Linlithgow, 

Aboyne, 

Kingston, 

Cardross, 

Gordon, 

Home, 

Newburgh, 

Oxenford, 

Cranston, 

Queensberry, 

Perth, 

Kilmarnock, 

Irvine, 

Burleigh, 

Argyle, 

Wigton, 

Dundonald, 

Kilsyth, 

Jedburgh, 

Douglas, 

Strathmore, 

Dumbarton, 

Dumblane, 

Maderty, 

Athol, 

Abercorn, 

Kintore, 

Preston, 

Cupar, 

Montrose, 

Kelly, 

Breadalbane, 

Newhaven, 

Napier, 

Roxburgh. 

Haddington, 

Aberdeen, 

Strathallan, 

Cameron, 

Galloway, 

Dunmore, 

Teviot, 

Cramond, 

MARQUISSES. 

Lauderdale, 

Melvill, 

Duplin, 

Reay, 

Seaforth, 

Orkney, 

Garnock, 

Forrester, 

Tweeddale, 

Kinnoul, 

Ruglen, 

Primrose. 

Pitsligo, 

Lothian, 

Loudon, 

March, 

Kirkcudbright, 

Annandale. 

Dumfries, 

Marchmont, 

LORDS. 

Eraser, 

Stirling, 

Seafield, 

Bargeny, 

EARLS. 

Elgin, 

Hyndford, 

Forbes, 

Bantr, 

Southesk, 

Cromarty, 

Salton, 

Elibank, 

Crawford, 

Traquair,. 

Stair, 

Gray, 

Halkerton, 

Errol, 

Ancrum, 

Roseberry, 

Ochiltree, 

Belhaven, 

Marischal, 

Wemyss, 

Glasgow, 

Cathcart, 

Abercromby, 

Sutherland, 

Dalhousie, 

Portmore, 

Sinclair, 

DutVus, 

Marr, 

Airly, 

Bute, 

Mordington, 

RoIIo, 

Monteith, 

Findlater, 

Hopetoun, 

Semple, 

Colvil, 

Rothes, 

Carnwath, 

Deloraine, 

Elphmston, 

Ruthven, 

Morton, 

Callender, 

Hay. 

Ohphant, 

Rutherford, 

Buchan, 

Leven, 

Eraser  of  Lovat, 

,  Ballenden, 

Glencairn, 

Dysart, 

VISCOUXTS. 

Borthwick, 

Newark, 

Eglinton, 

Panmure, 

Ross, 

Nairn, 

Cassilis, 

Selkirk, 

Falkland, 

Torphichen, 

Eymuuth, 

Caithness, 

Northesk, 

Dunbar, 

Spynie, 

Kinnaird, 

Murray, 

Kincardine, 

Stormont, 

Lindores, 

Glassford. 

VoL.n. 

4E 

1 84  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 


No  II. 


COPIES  OF  THE  WORDS  OF  LIMITATION  IN  THE  SEVERAL 
PATENTS  REFERRED  TO. 


Com:tes.  MONTEITH. 

PViUielmus  Comes  Taicbie  lie  Monteith. 

Carolus,  &c.  Volumus  et  concedimus  quod  prasfatus  Willielmus  Comes  Taichie 
Ultimo  ju-Hseredesq:  sui  Masculi  et  Tallie  Comitatus  Taichie  Comites  Jernie  et  Taichie  lie 
Hi  1631.    Stiathern  et  Monteith  omni  tempore  a  futuro  appellentur  et  vocentur. 

Dominus  Ro^ertus  Ker  de  Ancrame  Miles. 

Carolus,  &c.  Fecisse,  constituisse,  et  creasse,  dictum  Dominum  Robertum 
Comitem  de  Ancrame,  nobis  tamen  ita  visum  est,  ut  dictus  Titulus,  &-c.  immediate 
post  ipsum,  ad  Hseredes  Masculos  inter  eum  et  Dominam  Annam  Stanley  unicam 
Willielmi  Comitis  de  Derbie  Filiam  immediate  descendet ;  veram  si  Deo  visum 
fuerit,  quod  Haeredes  Masculi  dicti  Domini  Roberti  suaeq:  Conjugis  absque  Hasre- 
dibus  Masculis  de  eorum  corporibus  procreand'  decesserint,  tunc,  et  in  eo  casu, 
-1'"  J™"  dictus  Titulus  ad  alios  Haeredes  Masculos  diet'  Domini  Roberti  Ker,  eorumq:  Hie- 
^  ■'■^'    redes  Masculos,  in  perpetuum  descendet. 

FORFAR. 

Archibaldus  Douglas  Filius  legitimus  natii  maximus  inter  Demortuum  Archihaldum 
Angusia  Comitem,  et  Dominam  Jeannam  Wemys  Procreat'. 

Carolus,  &.C.  Fecisse,  constituisse,  et  creasse,  memoratum  Dynastum  Archibal- 
brkieaT.dum  Douglas,  ejusq:  Haeredes  Masculos,  Comitem  de  Forfar. 

DUMBARTON. 

Dynasta  Georgius  Douglas  Filius  natu  tertius  Demortui  Gulielmi  Marchionis  de 
Douglas. 

Carolus,  &c.  Fecisse  diet'  Georgium,  et  Ha;redes  Masculos,  ex  corpore  sue, 
Tj^?"'  Comites  de  Dumbarton. 

MELVILL. 

*  Georgius  Dominus  Melvill. 

GuLiELMUS  et  Maria,  &c.  Nominasse,  fecisse,  constituisse,  et  creasse  eundeni 
8vo  Apri. Georgium  Dominum  Melvill  Comitem,  &c.  Comitem  de  Melvill,  &-c.  designandum. 
lis  1690.  J)^JJJ^5  pQj-i-o^  concedimus,  et  conferimus,  in  diet'  Georgium  Doiainum  Melviil,  et 

Haeredes  Masculos  de  ejus  Corpore,  in  perpetuum,  antedictum  titulum  Comitis, 

&c. 


EXTERIOR  ORNAxMENTS. 


Dominiis  Joannes  Hamilton,  Filius  ntiperi  Dticis  ck  Hamilton. 

GuLiELMUs,  &c.  Nominasse,  fecisse,  constituisse,  et  creasse  eundem   Dominuni 
Joannem  Hamilton  Comitem,  &.c.  Comitem  de  Ruglcn  debigiiandum.    Danius  por- 
ro,  conferimus  in  dictum  Dominum  Joannem  Hamilton,  et  H;eiedes  Masculos  de 
ejus  corpore  ;  quibus  deficien',  Hasredes  de  ejus  corpora  quoscunque  antedictuiu  'j|'°  ^r.'' 
Titulum,  &-C.  Comitis.  ' '  *'' 


Bominus  Carolus  Hamilton,  Filius  le^itimus  ordim  nascendi  seciindiis  Gulielmi  Diicis 
de  Hamilton. 

Jacobus,  &-c.  Fecisse,  constituisse,  et  creasse  memoratum  Dominum  Carolum 
Hamilton  Comitem  de  Selknk,  &c.  Ac  damus,  concedimus,  et  conferimus  in  eun- 
dem Dominum  Carolum  Hamilton,  et  Ha;redes  Masculos  ex  ejus  Corpoie  ;  quibus 
deficien',  in  Dominum  Joannem  Hamilton,  Filium  legitimum  natu  tertmm  Guliel- 
mi Ducis  de  Hamilton,  et  Hsredes  Masculos  ex  ejus  Corpore  legitime  procieand'  ; 
quibus  deficien',  in  Dominum  Georgium  Hamilton,  ejus  Filium  legitimum  natu 
quartum,  et  Haredes  Masculos  ex  ejus  Corpore  legitime  procreand' ;  quibus  defi- 
cien', in  Dominum  Basilium  Kamilton,  Filium  legitimum  diet'  Ducis  natu  quin- 
tum,  et  Haeredes  Masculos  ex  ejus  Corpore  legitime  procreand'  ;  quibus  deficien' 
Dominuni  Archibaldum  Hamilton,  Filium  ejus  sextum  et  natu  minimum,  et  Ha- 
redes  Masculos  ex  ejus  corpore  legitime  procreand' ;  quibus  omnibus  deficien',  in 
alios  Haeredes  Masculos  dicti  Ducis  de  Kamilton,  et  in  Literis  suis  Patentibus  con-  , 
tentis  antedictum  Honoris  et  dignitatis  Titulum  Comitis  de  Selkirk,  &c.  i^s  i6 

SEAFIELD. 

yacohus  J'icecomes  de  Se afield. 

GuLiELMUs,  &-C.  Fecisse,  constituisse,  et   creasse  eundem  Jacobum  et  Hreredes 
Masculos  de  ejus  Corpore;  quibus  deficien',  alios  Haeredes  Tallin  sibi  in  Terris  suis 24,0  ju 
Baroniis,  et  Statu  succedend',  Comites  de  Seafield.  j-oi. 

Jacobus  Dominiis  Deskfoord. 

Carolus,  &C.  Fecisse,   constituisse,  creasse,  et  inaugurasse  prasfatum  Jacobum, 
Dominum  Deskfoord,  Comitem  de  Findlater,  et  dedimus  et  concessimus,  diet'  Do- 
mino Deskfoord  suisque  ha^redibus  Masculis  de  Corpore  suo  legitime  procreat'  ipsi^omoF 
in  Patrimonio,  et  Statu  de  Findlater  et  Deskfoord,  succedend'  Titulum,  &.c  Co-  '"■"^■■'' 
mitis.  '^^°- 


Bominus  Carolus  Douglas,  Filius  secundus  Ducis  de  ^leensberry. 

Anna,  &.c.  Fecisse,  constituisse  et  creasse  dictum  Carolum,  et  Haeredes  Mascu- 
los de  suo  Corpore  ;  quibus  deficien',  Dominum  Georgium  Douglas  Filium  legiti- 
mum natu  tertium  diet'  Ducis  de  Queensberry,  ej usque  Haeredes  Masculos  de  suo 
Corpore  ;  quibus  deficien',  Filium  legitimum  natu  juniorem  procreat'  seu  procre- 
and' de  corpore  diet'  Ducis  dignitati  et  Statui  de  Qiietnsberry  non  succedend'.et 
Haeredes  Masculos  de  ejus  Corpore,  Comites  de  Solway. 


186  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

e«oM..  OXFURD. 

Dominus  Jacobus  M'Gill  de  Cranston  M'Gill  Miles  Baroneius. 

Carolus,  8tc.  fecisse,  constituisse,  et  creasse,  dictum  Dominum  Jacobum  M'Gill 
de  Cranston  M'Gill  Militem  Baronetum,   ejusq:  Haeredes  Masculos  Talliae  et  Pro- 
no  Apri-  visionis  quoscunque,  Vicecomites  de  Oxfurd,  et  Dominos  M'Gill  de  Cousland. 

TEVIOT. 

Dominus  Thomas  Livingston,  Miles. 

GuLiELMUs,  &c.  fecisse  eundem  Majorem  Generalem  Dominum  Thomam  Li- 
DDecem-  vingston,  et  Hceredes  Masculos  legitime  procreates  scu  procreandos  de  suo  Corpora, 
is  1696.  Vicecomites  de  Teviot. 


Thomas  Hay  de  Balhoiisie. 

GuLiELMUS,  &-C.  nominasse,  fecisse,  constituisse,  et  creasse  praefatum  Thomam 
Hay  de  Balhousie  Viecomitem,  Vicecomitem  de  Duplin  nuncupan'  inque  eundem 
Dominum  Thomam  Hay,  et  Hieredes  Masculos  de  Corpore  ejus  legitime  procreat; 
quibus  deficien'  Haeredes  ejus  Talliae,  Titulum  Vicecomitis  damns,  &C. 


GuUehnus  Comes  de  Kinnoul,  et  Thomas  P'icecomes  de  Duplin. 

^\nna,  Sic.  dedisse  et  concessisse  prsedict'  Gulielmo  Comiti  de  Kinnoul,  durante 
ejus  Vita  ,et  quo  per  decessum  deficiente  praedicto  Thomae  Vicecomiti  de  Duplin,  et 
Haeredibus  Masculis  legitime  de  Corpore  suo  procreat'  vel  procreand';  quibus  de- 
ficien' Haeredibus  suis  Tallia;  et  Provisionis  illi  in  terris  et  Baronia  de  Duplin,  suc- 
cedentibus,  antedictum  Titulum,  &c.  Comitis  de  Kinnoul,  Vicecomitis  de  Duplin, 
&-C.  et  volumus  et  declaramus  quod  hoc  presens  Diploma  nuUo  modo  preejudicabit 
Diplomati,  per  quondam  nostrum  Fratrem  Gulielmum  Regem,  beatae  Memorias, 
prsedict'  Thomae  Vicecomiti  de  Duphn,  concesso  de  Titulo  et  Honore  Vicecomitis 
dedata. 


JEDBURGH. 

Robertus  Ker  de  Fernherst. 

Carolus,  &c.  Creamus,  facimus,  et  constituimus  pracnominatum  Robertum  Ker 
de  Fernherst,  Dominum  de  Jedburgh,  ac  damus  et  concedimus  ei  et  Haeredibus 
Masculis  ex  ejus  Corpore ;  qaibus  deficien'  Willielmo  Magistro  de  Newbottle,  et 
Haeredibus  Masculis  ex  ejus  Corpore;  quibus  deficien',  diet*  Magistri  de  Newbottle 
Haredibus  Masculis  quibuscunq:  Titulum.  Honorem,  Ordinem,  et  Dignitatem 
Domini  de  Jedburgh,  &c.  cum  prascedentia  et  ordine  Andreae  Domini  de  Jedburgh 
secundum  Literas  patentes  dedat'  2do  Febrii  1622. 


COUPAR. 

Jacobus  Dominus  de  Coupar. 

Jacobus,  &c.  Sciatis  nos  dedisse,  concessisse,  et  disposuisse  Jacobo  Elphinstone, 
FiHo  legitime  nostri  Consiliarii  Jacobi  Domini  de  Balmerinoch  nostri  Secretarii  ac 
Presidentis  nostri  CoUegii  Justitii,  inter  ilium  et  Dominam  Marjoriam  Maxwel  ejus 


EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS.  187 

Sponsam  legitime  procreat'  suisque  HxTcdibus  Musculis  de  Corporc  suo  legitime 
procieandis;  quibus  doficientibus  pra-tato  Jacobo  Damino  de  Balmerinoch  ejus 
Patri,  suisque  Hicredibus  Masculis  et  Talli:e  in  suo  Inreotamento  Ten'avum,  et  Ba- 
roniee  de  Balumbie  contentis  liKreditarie;  omnes  et  singulas  Terras,  Baronias,  Mo- 
lendina,  8tc.  et  nos  ereximus,  creavimus,  et  inc  jrporavimus  omnes  prtedictas  ter- 
ras, &-C.  in  unum  liberum  Temporale  Dominium  et  Baroniam  praefato  Jacobo 
Elphinstone,  suisq:  H.xredibus  Masculis  et  Talli;e,  pracdict'  Dominum  et  Baroniam  zomoDe- 
de  Coupar  nuncupan'  dando  et  concedendo  dicto  Jacobo  suisque  Ha.'redibus  Mas-  "^"^ 
culis  priedictis,  Titulum,  &.c.  unicis  libeii  Baronis,  ac  nostri  Parliament!  Domini, 
omni  Tempore  a  future  Dominos  de  Coupar  nuncupandos. 

CRAMOND. 

Elizabetha  Domina  Richardson,  et  Domimis  Thomas  Richardson,  Miles,  ejus  Filiiis. 

Carolus,  &c.  Fecisse,  creasse,  &  constituisse  Elizabetham  Dominam  Richardson, 
conjugem  Domini  Thomas  Richardson,  Militis,  Justiciarii  principalis  in  Foro  Cau- 
sarum  communi  in  Palatio  Westmonasteriensi,  pro  toto  Tempore  Vitre  suas,  Ba- 
ronissam  de  Cramond;  ac  post  illius  Decessuin,  creamus  perq:  Modum  Succes- 
sionis,  Dominum  Thomam  Richardson  Militem,  Filium  et  Hasredem  dicti  princi- 
palis Justiciarii,  Dominum  Baronem  de  Cramond.  Dando,  &-c.  eidem  post  deces- 
sum  diet'  Dominae  suisque  Ha^redibus  Masculis;  quibus  deficien'  Haeredibus  Mas- 
culis de  Corpore  diet'  Domini  Thoms  Richardson  Patris  post  Decessum  praefat'  ultimo 
Dominae,  Titulum,  &.c.  Baronum  Parliamenti,  tenend'  et  habend'  pra.-fat'  Titulum  f^j™'" 
Domini  Baronis  de  Cramond,  post  Decessum  prtefat'  Dominre,  cum  Suffragio  in 
Parliamento,  cummodo  personaliter  presentes  fuerint,  et  non  aliter. 

KIRKCUDBRIGHT. 

Dominus  Robert  us  MClellan,  Miles. 

Carolus,  &c.   Fecisse,   creasse,   et    constituisse    dictum   Dominum    Robertum 
M'ClelLm,  Dominum  de  Kirkcudbright;  dand'  et  concedend'  sibi  suisq:  Haeredi- 
bus  r.Iasculis,  Cognomen  et  Arma  dicti  Domini  Robert!  geren'  Titulum  Domini;  25(0  junn 
quoquidam  Titulo,  &.c.  Domini  de  Kirkcudbright,  ttos  investivimus  dictum  l>omi-  '^^s- 
num  Robertum  Hseredesq:  suos  Masculos  antedict'. 

ABERCROMBIE-. 

Dominus  Jacobus  Sandilands  de  St  Monance,  Miles. 

Carolus,  Etc.  Dedisse,  concessisse,  et  disposuisse,   Memorato  Dommo  Jacobo 
Sandilands,  ejusq:  Ha^redibus  Masculis  ex  Corpore  suo  legitime  procreat'  seu  pro-  umoDe- 
creand'  Titulum,  &.c.  Domini;  ac  damus,  &.c.  quod  ille  ejusq:  H;eredes  et  Succes- "^^j"" 
sores  praedict'  indignitabuntur  et   nominabuntur  Domini  de  Abercrombie,  omni 
tempore  future. 

RUTHERFURD. 
Andreas  Rutherfurd,  Legatus  Generalis. 

Carolus,  &-c.  Fecisse,  nominasse,  constituisse,  et  creasse,  Dominum  Rutherfurd 
de viz.  ipsum  Andream  ejusque  Haeredes  Masculos  ex  Corpore  suo  legi- 
time procreates  seu  procreandos;  quibus  deficientibus,  quamcunque  aliam  Per- 
sonam seu  Personas  quas  sibi,  quoad  vixerit,  quinetiam,  in  Articule  Mortis  ad  ei 
succedendum;  ac  fore  ejus  Hsredes  Tallin  &.  Provisionis  in  eadem  Dignitate,  no- 

VoL.n.  4F 


1 88  EXTERIOR  ORNAMENTS. 

minare  et  designaie  placuerit,  secundum  Nominationem  et  Designalionem  Manu 
ejus  subscribendam,  subsque  Provisionibus,  Restrictionibus,  et  Conditionibus,  a 
diet'  Andrea  pro  ejus  Arbitrio  in  dicta  Designatione  expiiinendis:  Ac  dedisse  et 
concessisse  Tenoreq:  Presentium  dare,  &-c.  ei,  ejusque  antedict'  dictum  Titulum, 
jjno  ja-  Honorem,  Dignitatem,  et  Gradum  Domini  Parliamenti,  ut  ua  tempore  fiituro  vo 
n<iarui66i.  citentur  et  denominentur,  cum  Potestate  sibi  sulsque  antedict'  denominandi  et  de- 

signandi  semetipsos  Dominos  Rutherfurd  de ac  gaudendi  et  fruendi  ea 

dem  Dignitate,  &c. 

NEWARK. 

David  Leslie,  Legatus  Generalis. 

Caholus,  &c.  Fecisse,  constituisse  et  creasse  diet'  Legatum  nosti<um  Generalem 

Davidem  Leslie,  et  Hoeredes  Masculos  ex  Corpore  suo  legitime  procreat'  Dominum 

de  Newark;  ac  dedimus  et  concessimus  Memorato  Legato  nostro  Generali  ejusque 

pra?diet'  antedictum  Titulum,  ut  Domini  de  Newark  omni  Tempore  future  deno^ 

Ultimo       minentur  et  designentur. 

Aug.i66i, 

AYMOUTH. 

Johannes  Churchill,  Militem  Tribunus. 

Carolus,  &c.  Nominasse,  fecisse,  constituisse  &-  creasse  praefatum  Joannem 
Churchill  Tribunum  antedictum  Dominum,  Dominum  Churchill  de  Aymouth 
omni  Tempore  futuro  designandum;  dando  et  elargiendo  diet'  Joanni  Churchill 

cembris"   haeredibusq:  Masculis  ex  suo  Corpore  proereatis  vel  proereandis,  prsedictum  Titulum, 

i68i.         gtc.  ut  praedicitur. 

GLASFOORD. 

Franciscus  Ahercromhie  de  Fetternier. 

Jacobus,  8ic.  Nominasse,  creasse,  et  inaugarasse  prtefatum  Franeiseum  Aber- 
crombie  Fetternier  (omnimodo  assumentem  Cognomen  de  Sempil,  ac  insignia  Gen>- 
tilitia  ejusdem  gerentem)  Liberum  Dominum,  Dominum  Glasfoord  denominand' 
duran'  omnibus  su»  vitae  diebus. 

3 


The  following  is  a  Copy  of  the  iHstrumciil  taken  by  Mr  William  Wilsok, 
one  of  the  Uiidcr-Claks  of  Sessio//,  at  Depositing  the  Regalu  of  Scoria. \d 
in  the  Castle  of  Edinburgh  :  And  agreeable  to  this  Description  the  f  Halving 
Copperplate  is^  with  great  accuracy,  engraved. 


AT  the  Castle  of  Edinburgh,  and  within  the  crown-room  there,  bctv.ixt  the 
hours  of  one  and  two  afternoon,  of  the  26th  day  of  March,  in  the  one 
thousand  seven  hundred  and  seventh  year  of  our  Lord,  and  sixth  year  of  the  reign 
of  her  Majesty,  Anne,  by  the  grace  of  God,  Qiiccn  of  Scotland,  Enghmd,  France 
and  Ireland,  Defender  of  the  Faith;  the  which  day,  in  presence  of  us  notaries  pub- 
lic, and  witnesses  under  subscribing,  compeared  personally  William  Wilson,  one  of 
the  Under-Clerks  of  Session,  Depute-Marischal,  for  himself,  as  procurator  for,  and 
in  name  and  behalf  of  William  Earl  Marischal,  Lord  Keith  and  Altrie,  isc.  Great 
Marischal  of  the  Kingdom  of  Scotland,  Heritable  Keeper  of  the  Regalia  thereof, 
viz.  crown,  sceptre,  and  sword ;  and  there,  in  presence  of  David  Earl  of  Glasgow, 
Lord  Boyle,  &.c.  Lord  Thesaurer- Depute,  who,  for  himself,  and  in  name  of  the  re- 
manent Lords  Commissioners  of  Thesaury,  was  present  to  receive  the  above  re- 
galia, the  said  William  Wilson,  after  producing  and  reading  a  piocuratory  granted 
by  the  said  noble  earl  to  him,  of  the  contents  therein,  and  after  mentioned,  dated 
and  registrate  in  the  books  of  Council  and  Session,  on  the  25th  day  of  March  in- 
stant, did  also  produce  to  the  said  Lord  Thesaurcr-Depute,  a  schedule,  signed  by 
him,  and  us  notaries  public  undersubscribing,  containing  an  inventory  and  parti- 
cular description   of   the    said    regalia,   as  follows  : The   imperial   crown   of 

SCOTLAND  is  of  purc  gold,  enriched  with  many  precious  stones,  diamonds,  pearls, 
and  curious  enamellings;  its  parts  and  specific  forms  are  these,  imo,  It  is  com- 
posed of  a  large  broad  circle,  or  fillet,  which  goes  round  the  head,  adorned 
with  twenty-two  large  precious  stones,  viz.  topazes,  amethysts,  garnets,  emeralds, 
rubies,  and  hyacinths,  in  collets  of  gold  of  various  forms,  and  with  curious  ena- 
mellings, and  betwixt  each  of  these  collets  and  stones  are  interposed  great  orien- 
tal pearls,  one  of  which  is  wanting,  zdo.  Above  the  great  circle  there  is  another 
small  one,  formed  with  twenty  points,  adorned  with  the  like  number  ot  diamonds 
and  sapphires  alternatively,  and  the  points  are  topped  with  as  many  great  pearls; 
after  which  form  are  the  coronets  of  our  lords  barons.  3/w,  The  upper  circle  isrele- 
vate  or  heightened  with  ten  crosses  fleury,  each  being  adorned  in  the  centre  with 
a  great  diamond,  betwixt  four  great  pearls  placed  in  the  cross  i  and  j,  but  some 
of  the  pearls  are  wanting;  and  the  number  extant  upon  the  upper  part  of  the 
crown,  besides  vi'hat  are  in  the  under  circle,  and  in  the  cross  patee,  are  fifty-one, 
and  these  crosses  fleury  are  interchanged  with  other  ten  high  flower-de-luces,  all 
alternatively  with  the  foresaid  great  pearls,  below  which  top  the  points  of  the  se- 
cond small  circle.  Nota,  This  is  said  to  be  the  ancient  form  of  the  crown  of  Scot- 
land, since  the  league  made  betwixt  Achaius  King  of  Scots  and  Charles  the  Great 
of  France,  the  specific  form  of  our  crown  differing  from  other  imperial  crowns,  in 
that  it  is  heightened  or  raised  with  crosses  fleury,  alternatively  with  flower-de-luces; 
the  crown  of  France  is  heightened  only  with  flower-de-luces ;  and  that  of  England 
with  crosses  patee,  alternatively  with  flower-de-luces.  Our  crown  of  Scotland, 
since  King  James  VI.  went  to  England,  has  been  ignorantly  represented  by 
herald-painters,  engravers,  and  other  tradesmen,  after  the  form  of  the  crown  of 
England,  with  crosses  patee,  whereas  there  is  not  one  but  that  which  tops  the 
mond,  but  all  crosses  fleury,  such  as  we  see  on  our  old  coins,  and  these  which  top 
our  old  churches,  these  crowns  were  not  anciently  arched  or  close.  Charles  VIII. 
of  France  is  said  to  be  the  first  in  France  who  took  a  close  crown,  as  appears  by 
his  medals  coined  in  the  year  one  thousand  four  hundred  and  ninety-five,  being 
designed  Imperator  Orientis:  Edward  V.  of  England,  in  the  year  one  thousand 
four  hundred  and  eighty-three,  carried  a  close  cro.vn,  as  is  obsei-ved  by  Selden; 
and  ovu- crown  is  arched  thus:   4/0,  From  the  upper  circle  proceed  four  arches 


ipo 


INSTRUMENT,  'dc. 


adorned  with  enamelled  figures,  which  meet  and  close  at  the  top,  surmounted  with 
a  mend  of  gold,  or  celestial  globe,  enamelled  blue  seme,  or  powdered  with  stars, 
wrossed  and  enamelled  with  a  large  cross  patee,  adorned  in  the  extremities  with  a 
great  pearl;  such  a  cross  tops  the  church  of  Holyroodhouse,  and  cantoned  with 
other  four  in  the  angles:  In  the  centre  of  the  cross  patee  there  is  a  square  ame- 
thyst, which  points  the  fore  part  of  the  crown;  and  behind,  or  on  the  other  side, 
is  a  great  pearl,  and  below  it,  on  the  foot  of  the  paler  part  of  the  cross,  are  these 
characters,  J.  R.  5.  By  which  it  appears  King  James  V.  was  the  first  that  closed 
the  crown  with  arches,  and  topped  it  with  a  mond  and  cross  patee.  But  it  is  evi- 
dent, nno.  That  the  money  and  medals  coined  in  the  reigns  of  King  James  III. 
and  IV.  have  a  close  crown ;  and  it  is  no  less  clear,  that  the  arches  of  the  crown 
were  not  put  there  from  the  beginning,  or  at  the  making  of  the  crown;  Because, 
imo.  They  are  tacked  by  tacks  of  gold  to  the  ancient  crown,  zdo.  The  work- 
manship of  the  arch  is  not  so  good,  and  there  is  a  small  distinction  in  the  fineness 
betwixt  the  first  and  the  last,  the  latter  being  superfine  gold,  and  the  other  not  so 
exactly  to  that  standard,  whereof  trial  has  been  made.  5/0,  The  tire  or  bonnet  of  the 
«:rown  was  of  purple  velvet;  but  in  the  year  one  thousand  six  hundred  and  eighty- 
live  it  got  a  cap  of  crimson  velvet,  adorned  as  before  with  four  plates  of  gold, 
richly  wrought  and  enamelled,  and  in  each  of  them  a  great  pearl,  half  inch  in 
diameter,  which  appear  between  the  four  arches,  and  the  bonnet  is  turned  up  with 
ermine;  upon  the  lowest  circle  of  the  crown,  immediately  above  the  ermine,  there 
are  eight  small  holes,  disposed  two  and  two  together,  on  the  four  quarters  of  the 
crown,  in  the  middle  space  betwixt  the  arches,  to  which  they  have  laced  or  tied 
diamonds,  or  precious  stones:  The  crown  is  nine  inches  broad  in  diameter,  being 
twenty-seven  inclies  about,  and  in  height,  from  the  under  circle  to  the  top  of  the 
cross  patee,  six  inches  and  a  half;  it  always  stands  on  a  square  cushion  of  crimson 
velvet,  adorned  with  fringes,  and  four  tassels  of  gold  thread  hanging  down  at  each 

corner. The  sceptre.     The  stalk  or   stem  of  the   sceptre  being  silver,  double 

over-gilt,  is  two  foot  in  length,  of  hexagon  form,  with  three  buttons  or  knobs  an- 
swering thereto:  Betwixt  the  first  button  and  the  second  is  the  handle,  of  hexagon 
forn\,  furling  in  the  middle,  and  plain;  betwixt  the  second  button  and  the  third 
there  are  three  sides  engraven;  that  under  the  Virgin  Mary,  one  of  the  statues 
that  are  on  the  top  of  the  stalk,  is  the  letter  y.  Upon  the  second  side,  under  St 
James,  the  letter  R.  And  on  the  third,  under  St  Andrew,  the  figure  5.  The  side 
betwixt  y  and  R  is  engraven  with  fourteen  flower-de-luces ;  and  on  the  side  be- 
twixt the  figure  5  and  the  letter  y  are  ten  thistles  continued  from  one  stem ;  from 
the  third  button  to  the  capital  the  three  sides  under  the  statues  are  plain;  on  the 
other  three  are  antique  engravings,  viz.  sacramental  cups,  antique  Medusa's  heads^ 
and  rullion  folliages;  upon  the  top  of  the  stalk  is  an  antique  capital  of  leaves  im- 
bossed ;  upon  the  abacus  whereof,  arises  round  the  prolonged  stem,  surrounded 
with  three  statues,  xst,  That  of  the  Blessed  Virgin,  crowned  with  an  open  crown, 
holding  in  her  right  arm  our  Blessed  Saviour,  and  in  her  left  hand  a  mond,  en- 
signed  with  a  cross:  Next  to  her,  on  her  right  hand,  stands  the  statue  of  St  An- 
drew, in  an  apostolical  garment,  and  on  his  head  a  bonnet  like  a  Scots  bonnet, 
holding  in  his  right  hand  a  cross  or  saltier,  a  part  whereof  is  broke  off,  and  in  his 
left,  elevate,  a  book  open:  On  the  Blessed  Virgin's  left  hand,  St  Andrew's  right 
hand,  stands  another  statue,  seeming  to  represent  St  James,  with  the  like  apostoli- 
cal garment,  and  an  hanging  neck  superadded  thereto,  and  upon  his  head'a  little 
hat  like  to  the  Roman  pileum;  in  his  right  hand,  half  elevate,  a  book  open,  and  in 
his  left  a  pastoral  staff,  the  head  is  broke  off,  and  above  each  statue,  being  tw^o 
inches  and  an  half,  (excepting  the  Virgin,  which  is  a  little  less)  the  finishing  of  a 
Gothic  niche:  Betwixt  each  statue  arises  a  rullion  in  form  of  a  dolphin,  very 
distinct,  in  length  four  inches,  fohage  along  the  body,  their  heads  upward  and 
affronted  inward,  and  the  turnings  of  their  tails  ending  in  a  rose  or  cinquefoil  out- 
ward: Above  these  rullions  and  statues  stands  another  hexagon  button,  or  knot, 
with  oak  leaves  under  every  corner,  and  above  it  a  chrystal  globe  of  two  inches 
and  a  quarter  diameter,  within- three  bars  jointed  above,  where  it  is  suimounted 
with  six  rullions;  and  here  again  with  an  oval  globe,  topped  with  an  oriental  pearl, 

an  half  inch  diameter:  The  whole  sceptre  in  lengrh  is  thirty -four  inches. The 

SWOR.0.     The  sword  is  in  length  five  feet;  the  handle  and  pommel  are  of  silver 


INSTRUMENT,  ^c.  jyr 

over-gilt,  in  length  fifteen  inches;  the  pommel  is  round,  and  somewhat  flat  on  the 
two  sides;  on  the  middle  of  each  theie  is,  of  embossed  woik,  a  garland,  and  in  the 
centre  there  have  been  two  enamelled  plates,  which  arc  broke  otV;  the  travel  =c,  or 
cross  of  the  sword,  being  of  silver,  ov»r-gilt,  is  in  length  seventeen  inches  and  an 
half;  its  form  is  like  two  dolpliins,  their  heads  joining,  and  their  tails  end  into 
acorns;  the  shell  is  hanging  down  towards  the  point  of  the  sword,  formed  like  an 
escalop  flourished,  or  rather  like  a  great  oak  leaf;  on  the  blade  of  tiie  sword  arc 
indented  with  gold  these  letters,  Julius  II.  P.  The  scabbard  is  ot  crimson  velvet, 
covered  with  silver,  gilded  and  wrought  in  philigram  work,  into  branches  of  the 
oak  tree  leaves  and  acorns;  on  the  scabbard  are  placed  four  round  plates  of  silver, 
over-gilt;  two  of  them,  near  to  the  crampet,  are  enamelled  blue,  and  thereon  in 
golden  characters  Julius  II.  Ton.  Max.  N.  At  the  mouth  of  the  scabbard,  op- 
posite to  the  heck,  is  a  large  square  plate  of  silver,  enamelled  purple,  in  a  cartoucii 
azure,  an  oak  tree  eradicated  and  fructuated  or;  and  above  the  cartouch  the 
papal  ensign,  viz.  two  keys  in  saltier  adosse;  their  bowls  formed  like  roses,  or 
cinquefoils,  tied  with  trappings,  and  tassels  hanging  down  at  each  side  of  the  car- 
touch:  Above  the  keys  is  the  papal  tiara,  environed  with  three  crowns,  with  two 
labels  turned  up,  adorned  with  crosses.  Pope  Julius  11.  who  gifted  the  sword  to 
King  James  IV.  had,  for  liis  armorial  figures,  an  oak  tree  fructuated,  which  is  the 
reason  the  sword  is  adorned  with  such  figures,  a  hill  and  a  star;  which  figu\es  I 
find  not  on  any  part  of  the  sword  :  if  they  liave  been  on  the  two  enamelled  plates 
which  are  lost  off  from  the  pommel,  I  know  not ;  but  it  is  certain  the  Pope  had 
such  figures,  as  appears  by  these  verses  made  by  Voltoline,  a  famous  Italian  poet, 
as  the  same  are  mentioned  by  Hermanus  Hermes,  a  German  writer,  who  gives  us 
these  lines  found  in  the  monastery : 

Qiiercus,  mons,  Stella,  formant  sua  stemmata,  princcps; 
Hisque  tribus  trinum  stat  diadema  tuum. 
Tula  nans  Petri  mediis  non  llectitur  undis; 
Mons  tegit  a  ventis,  stellaque  monstrat  iter. 


Vol.  II.  4  G 


'SCC' 


APPENDIX. 


GENEALOGICAL  ACCOUNT 
OF 

KEITH,  Marischal  of  Scotland  ; 

From  the  Genealogical  Historj  of  the  Family,  and  other  authorities. 


THE  family  derives  its  origin  and  descent  from  the  Catti,  a  people  bordering 
on  the  Saltus  Hercynius  ;  who  were  the  only  Germans  that  made  the  first 
stop  to  the  Roman  conquest  in  the  time  of  Augustus  Cssar,  till  the  reign  of  Tibe- 
rius his  successor,  when  they  were  entirely  routed  under  the  conduct  of  Germani- 
cus,  as  some  writers  relate,  particularly  Hadrianus  Junius  in  his  Historia  Bataviir, 
dedicated  to  the  States  of  Holland,  anno  1575.  Upon  which  overthrow  a  part  of 
the  Catti  submitted  to  the  Roman  yoke,  to  retain  their  possessions  in  their  native 
country  ;  which  is  now  under  the  dominion  of  the  Landgrave  of  Hesse-Cassel ; 
who,  amongst  his  other  titles,  designs  himself  Princeps  Cattorum  :  But  the  most, 
preferring  their  liberty,  left  their  country,  in  order  to  find  out  an  habitation  where 
they  might  enjoy  it.  These,  under  their  leader  Battus,  (as  the  foresaid  Junius  has 
it)  accordingly  fixed  about  the  mouth  of  the  Rhine,  from  whence  the  country  was 
named  Batavia,  from  their  said  leader  ^z/aj-i  Batton-have ;  for  have,  in  the  old  lan- 
guage, sfgnified  what  the  Latins  call  peculium.  The  Catti,  the  above  author  says, 
built  a  castle  on  the  banks  of  the  Rhine,  called  from  their  ancient  name  Catienel- 
bogen,  which  is  reckoned  in  the  Hessian  territories. 

A  neighbouring  people,  called  the  Mbravii,  were  expelled  by  the  same  con- 
querors ;  and,  under  Roderick  their  leader,  landed  at  the  Frith  now  called  Mur- 
ray Frith,  in  the  reign  of  Corbred  I.  King  of  Scots,  about  the  63d  year  of  Christ, 
and  were  kindly  entertained  by  that  prince,  as  being  very  serviceable  to  him  in 
his  wars  against  the  Romans,  for  which  they  were  rewarded  with  the  lands  called 
Murray  to  this  day. 

Sometmie  after,  in  the  reign  of  Corbredus  IL  surnamed  Galdus,  the  foresaid 
Batavian  Catti  sent  a  colony  of  their  number  to  seek  habitations  in  the  isle  of 
Britain  ;  and  being  dispersed  in  a  storm,  some  of  them  (whom  Camden  calls  Catti 
Euchlani)  were  carried  to  the  mouth  of  the  river  Thames,  where  they  all  pro- 
bably designed,  as  being  the  nearest  coast  ;  and  the  rest  were  driven  to  the  north- 
ern parts  of  Scotland,  (whom  Fordun  calls  Catti  Meliboci)  and  landed  in  that  part 
thereof  now  called  Caithness ;  which  name  had  its  rise  from  the  Catti  and  the  word 
ness,  which  in  the  old  Scots  Irish  signifies  a  cape  or  promontory,  quasi promontorium 
Chattorum,  perhaps  from  the  cape  where  they  first  landed  :  Under  which  name,  at 
first,  were  included  not  only  the  present  Caithness,  but  also  Sutherland  and  Strath- 


2  APPENDIX. 

naver ;  and  the  inhabitants  Cattl,  or  in  the  Scots  Irish,  Cattegh.  In  process  of  time 
the  n;;ine  ol"  Caithness  was  restricted  to  the  shire  so  presently  called;  and  the  rest 
were  called  Sutherland,  from  the  southern  situation  with  respect  to  Caithness ;  As 
appears  by  Mr  Bleau  in  his  Geography,  Camden,  Brand,  and  others. 

However  the  Cdti  remained  possessors  of  these  lands,  and  were  as  kindly 
received  by  the  then  king,  to  whom  they  were  as  serviceable  as  the  Moruvii 
then-  countrymen  had  been  to  his  father,  in  the  wars  against  the  Romans  their 
invaders. 

They  continued  in  the  possession  of  their  lands  for  upwards  of  900  years :  In 
which  time  they  spread  out  in  several  branches  through  the  highlands,  and  are  at 
this  day  distinguished  by  several  surnames,  such  as  Keith,  Sutherland,  Clan  Mhur- 
rich  or  Macpnerson,  Macgilvray,  &C.  under  the  general  denomination  of  Clan 
Chattan. 

In  the  time  of  King  Malcolm  II.  of  Scotland,  who  began  his  reign  anno  1004, 
Sueno  King  of  Denmark  having  conquered  England,  and  overthrown  their  King 
Ethelred,  resolved  to  reduce  likewise  Scotland  to  his  obedience;  and  was  for  a 
considerable  time  successful  in  his  attempt,  till  King  Malcolm  obtained  a  singular 
victory  over  the  Danes,  under  the  command  of  their  general  Camus,  a  kinsman 
of  Sueno,  at  Bairy,  six  miles  from  Dundee.  Which  victory  was  chiefly  attributed 
to  the  valour  of  the  Catti,  under  the  conduct  of  Robert  their  leader ;  who,  besides 
,  his  good  service  in  the  battle,  pursued  Camus  and  the  surviving  part  of  the  Danes, 
as  they  were  endeavouring  to  retreat  into  Murray,  (then  in  the  Danish  possession) 
and  overtook  and  killed  them  two  miles  from  the  place  of  battle  ;  where  Camus 
(a  person  of  gigantic  stature,  and  prodigiously  strong)  fell  by  the  hand  of  Robert, 
in  a  single  duel,  Upon  report  of  which,  King  Malcolm  was  curious  to  see  the 
place, and  the  body  of  Camus;  and  having  come  up  for  that  purpose,  and  there- 
upon commending  sufficiently  the  valour  of  Robert,  he  dipped  his  three  middle 
lingers  in  the  blood  of  Camus,  and  therewith  drew  three  perpendicular  strokes  on 
the  upper  part  of  Robert's  shield;  and  having  before  the  battle  assured  his  soldiers 
that  God  (whose  house  those  savages  had  demolished,  and  whose  services  they  had 
despised)  would  grant  them  victory,  said  to  those  about  him,  Veritas  vincit ;  which 
pales  and  words  Robert's  successors  have  of  old  carried  for  their  arms  and  motto, 
in  memory  of  this  great  action.  This  battle  was  fought  in  the  year  loio. 
.  There  is  mentioned  by  Camden  in  the  edition  1722,  col.  1257,  and  extant  to 
this  day,  an  obelisk  of  stone,  called  by  the  vulgar  Camus-cross ;  and  the  little 
village  near  by  retains  the  name  of  Camustoun  to  this  day.  And  Boethius  says, 
that  in  his  time  multitudes  of  prodigious  bones  were  digged  up  in  the  adjacent 
fields,  with  a  huge  stone  coffin,  in  which  were  found  several  large  bones,  supposed 
to  be  those  of  Camus. 

In  regard  of  so  great  service  the  king  was  pleased  instantly  to  bestow  upon 
Robert  the  honour  of  knighthood,  and  created  him  heritable  Great  Marischal  of 
Sci^tland  ;  which  his  posterity  have  since  enjoyed,  and  several  lands  which  the 
king  bestowed  upon  him  (particularly  some  in  East  Lothian)  were  from  his  name  and 
office  called  Keith-Marischal,  and  the  small  island  in  the  river  of  Forth  called 
Inch-Keith,  &.C.  The  ancient  name  of  Cbatti,  or  Catti,  being  by  process  of  time, 
according  to  the  Scots  dialect,  transposed  to  Kethi,  Kejcbt,  and  still  more  lately, 
for  softness  of  pronunciation  Keitb  :  Which  became  an  hereditary  surname  to  this 
illustrious  family. 

I.  Sir  Robert  was  married  on  Margaret  Eraser,  daughter  to  Simon  Eraser  of 
Tweeddale,  by  whom  he  had  a  son  called  after  his  own  name. 

II.  This  Robert,  second  of  the  name.  Great  Marischal  of  Scotland,  when  Sueno 
King  of  Norway  invaded  Scotland,  in  the  time  of  King  Duncan,  commanded  a 
parr  of  the  Scots  army  at  the  battle  of  Culross,  where  the  Scots  were  defeated. 
Thereafter  he,  with  Banquo  and  Macbeth,  fell  upon  the  Norwegians  in  their  camp, 
and  cut  them  almost  entirely  oft";  so  that  there  was  scarce  so  many  saved  as  to 
carry  off  their  king  to  his  ships.  Which  overthrow  is  mentioned  by  all  our  histo- 
rians. He  married  a  lady  called  Elizabeth  Strachan,  of  whose  parentage  we  have 
no  certain  account ;  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son, 

2 


APPENDIX.  3 

III.  Sir  Robert  Keith,  who  married  Elizabeth  Cuming,  daughter  to  John 
Cuming,  a  potent  m;in,  who  was  by  Alexander  I.  King  ot"  Scotland,  advanced 
f>,  im  nier.is,  to  great  honour  and  riclies.  And  laid  the  foundation  of  many  great 
families  of  his  name.     Sir  Robert  was  succeeded  by  his  son, 

IV.  Sir  Patrick.  Iveith  Manachal,  who  married  Maigaret  iMair,  daughter  to  the 
Earl  of  Marr :  Their  son 

V.  Sir  WiLLiAii  Kj£ith  Marischal  of  Scotland,  with  the  Earls  of  March,  Mon- 
teith,  and  Angus,  encountered  the  English  at  Allerton  in  England;  and,  after  a 
bloody  battle,  proved  victorious,  took  many  prisoners,  among  whom  was  King 
Stephen's  general,  in  the  year  1133,  in  the  reign  of  King  David  1.  Sir  William 
had  for  his  wife  Eliiabeth  Seaton,  daughter  to  the  Earl  of  Winton's  predecessor, 
who  bore  to  him 

VI.  Sir  Robert  Keith  Maiischal.  He,  with  Gilchrist  Earl  of  Angus,  went 
with  forces  against  Somerled  Thane  of  Argyle,  and  the  other  rebels,  who  took  arms 
against  King  Malcolm  IV.  defeated  and  dissipated  them.  He  married  Elisabeth 
Eraser,  daughter  to  Eraser  of  Twceddale»     His  son  and  successor 

VII.  Sir  Hknky  Keitu  Marischal,  who,  by  virtue  of  his  ollice,  attended  King 
William  the  Lion  in  his  e.x^peJition  against  King  Henry  II.  of  England ;  and, 
with  the  Earl  of  Angus,  defeated  the  English,  after  the  king  had  been  treacherously 
surprised  by  a  party  of  the  enemies'  horse  at  Alnwick.  This  Sir  Henry  granted  a 
charter  to  the  monks  of  Kelso,  of  the  patronage  of  the  church  of  Keith,  in  pure- 
and  perpetual  alms,  to  pray  for  the  health  of  his  soul,  as  in  the  register  of  Kelso, 
MS.  He  married  MargaieL  Douglas,  daughter  to  William,  chief  of  that  name  : 
His  son  and  successor  was 

Vtll.  Sir  Robert  Keith  Marischal.  He  accompanied  King  William  and  his 
brother  David  Earl  of  Huntingdon  into  England,  to  congratulate  King  Richard's 
safe  return  from  the  Holy  Land  ;  and  afterwards,  with  the  Earls  of  Fife  and 
Athol,  led  an  army  against  the  rebellious  islanders,  whom  they  defeated.  He 
married  Jean  Gordon,  daughter  to  the  chief  of  that  name.  He  was  succeed- 
ed by 

IX.  Sir  WitLiAM  Keith,  who  attended,  by  virtue  of  his  office  as  Marischal, 
King  Alexander  II.  in  his  progress  through  the  northern  parts  of  Scotland; 
and  afterwards,  with  his  cousin  the  Earl  of  Buchan,  marched  against  the  re- 
bel Gillespie,  whom  they  took,  with  his  two  sons,  who  were  all  beheaded.  He 
married  Agnes  Dunbar,  daughter  to  the  Earl  of  March  :  And  was  succeeded  by 
his  son 

X.  Sir  Robert  Keith.  He  marched  with  King  Alexander  III.  against  Acho 
King  of  Norway,  who  was  routed  and  defeated.  Sir  Robert  married  Jean  Ogilvie, 
daughter  to  the  chief  of  that  name. 

XI.  Sir  John  succeeded  his  said  father;  and  married  Margaret  Cuming,  daughter 
to  the  Earl  of  Buchan  :  Their  son 

XII.  Sir  Robert  Keith  Marischal  shared  largely  of  the  troubles  wherewith  the 
country  was  shaken  after  the  death  of  Alexander  III.  during  the  wars  betwixt 
Scotland  and  England.  He  would  not  comply  with  the  English,  though  nearly 
allied  to  the  Cumings,  who  were  deeply  engaged  in  that  interest.  He  married 
Barbara  Seaton,  daughter  to  the  Earl  of  Winton's  predecessor,  by  whom  he  had 
Sir  Robert,  who  succeeded  him,  and  two  daughters,  one  married  to  William  Lord 
Douglas,  to-named  the  Hardy :  She  bare  two  sons.  Good  Sir  James  Douglas,  who 
raised  the  family  of  Douglas,  and  his  brother  Hugh. 

XIII.  Sir  Robert  Keith  Marischal  was  a  most  zealous  defender  of  his  country 
against  the  English.  When  his^brother-in-law,  William  Douglas,  was  dispossessed  of 
his  land,  and  cast  into  prison  by  the  English,  where  he  died  in  anno  1280,  he  sent 
his  nephew,  called  afterwards  Good  Sir  James,  to  France,  and  bred  him  upon  his 
own  charges ;  and,  when  he  came  home,  entered  him  upon  the  course  of  loyalty 
and  virtue  by  which  he  and  his  family  rose  to  so  much  honour.  The  Marischal 
deserted  the  then  king,  John  Baliol,  upon  \vs  surrendering  the  sovereignty  of  the 
kingdom  to  the  English,  though  John  Baliol  gave  him  a  new  charter  of  his  lands 
of  Keith,  Michelston,  EUem,  Molener,  Stc.  in  Ubgram  waneniam  (as  Sir  James 
Dalrymple  in  his  Collections)  and  Sir  Robert  Sibbald,  in  his  History  of  Fife,  says, 
"  In  the  year  1309,  Robert  de    Keith  Marischal,   and  Justiciar  benorth  Forth, 

Vol.  U.  4  H 


4  APPENDIX. 

"  appoints  an  inquest  of  some  barons,  freeholders,  and  others,  of  Fife,  to  determmt 
"  a  dilference  betwixt  the  abbot  of  Lindures  arid  the  town  of  Newburgh  ;  and' 
"  theie  was  also  present  Sir  Walter  de  Keith."  The  Marischal  went  over  to  King 
Robert  Bruce's  interest,  and  contributed  his  utmost  endeavours  to  bring  that  brave 
prince  to  the  throne.  He  was  the  chief  instrumerit  of  gaining  the  battle  of  In- 
veruiy,  which  was  the  hrst  ever  that  great  prince  obtained,  and  ushered  in  all  his 
other  glorious  victories  :  For  which  King  Robert  gave  him  one  of  his  own  houses 
called  Hall-Forest,  and  several  lands  near  about.  At  the  battle  of  Bannockburn' 
he  commanded  500  horse,  and  gave  the  first  onset,  and  defeat  a  party  of  English 
horse  sent  to  reinforce  Philip  Mowbray  Governor  of  Stirling  ;  which  made  way 
for  that  glorious  victory  King  Robert  obtained  in  the  above-mentioned  place. 
At  the  Parliament  of  Perth,  in  anno  1320,  the  king  gave  him  a  great  part  of  his 
cousin  the  Earl  of  Buchan  his  lands,  who  was  forfeited  for  adhering  to  the  English 
interest.  King  Robert  had  a  great  value  and  esteem  of  Sir  Robert  Keith  Maris- 
chal, in  so  much  as  he  made  him  one  of  his  ambassadors,  first  to  the  court  of 
England,  and  then  to  France,  in  the  year  1325,  with  the  Earl  of  Murray,  to  treat 
with  that  crown  upon  very  weighty  affairs  relating  to  the  two  nations;  which  was 
performed  by  them  with  honour  and  conduct :  See  Faedera  Scotice,  MS.  of  late  in 
the  Earl  of  Winton's  possession,  now  in  the  lawyers'  library  :  And,  as  Dr  Aber- 
cromby,  in  his  first  volume  of  the  History  of  Scotland,  says,  "  Tliis  Sir  Robert 
"  Keith  Marischal  was  one  of  the  fastest  friends  King  Robert  had. 

This  great  patriot  of  the  nation,  in  a  good  old  age,  was  killed  fighting  valiantly 
at  the  battle  of  Duplin,  against  Edward  Baliol,  with  most  part  of  his  friends, 
"  Cum  plerisque  ex  familia  sua  nobilibus  (say  Boethius).  Cummagno  propinquo- 
"  mm  &  clientium  numero,"  (says  Buchanan).  And  this  is  the  reason  why 
famihes  of  a  later  date  are  more  numerous  in  their  branches  and  cadets  than  the 
Keiths.  They  having  been  in  every  action,  by  virtue  of  their  office  of  Marischal, 
present,  and  attended  by  their  friends  in  every  battle,  the  males  were  seldom 
allowed  to  increase  to  any  considerable  number  :  But  this  fight,  on  the  3d  of  Au- 
gust 1332,  gave  them  the  severest  blow  they  ever  received.  This  Sir  Robert  mar- 
ried Barbara  Douglas,  daughter  to  the  chief  of  that  name,  by  whom  he  had  two 
sons,  viz.  John,  who  died  before  his  father,  and  left  behind  him  a  son  called  Ro- 
bert ;  and  Sir  William,  who  attended  his  cousin,  Good  Sir  James  Douglas,  whea 
he  went  with  King  Robert's  heart  to  the  Holy  Land. 

XIV.  This  Robert  Keith  succeeded  his  grandfather  in  his  estate  and  office. 
He  was  also  knighted  as  his  progenitors;  a  man  of  great  courage,  and  most  active- 
m.  driving  Edward  Baliol  out  of  the  country,  and  restoring  King  David.  He  besieg- 
ed Perth,  when  strongly  fortified  and  kept  out  by  Macduff  Earl  of  Fife,  and  after 
three  months  close  siege  took  it,  and  sent  the  Earl,  with  his  wife  and  children,-  pri- 
Mners,  to  Kildrummy.  He  married  Margaret  Hay,  daughter  to  Gilbert  Lord  Hay, 
the  first  constable  of  that  family.  By  herhe  had  two  sons,  William  and  Edward,  and 
two  daughters;  the  one  married  to  John  Maitland,  predecessor  to  the  Earl  of  Lau- 
derdale, and  the  other  to  the  Laird  of  Drum-Irvine.  Sir  William,  the  eldest  son, 
was  one  of  the  greatest  heroes  of  his  time  ;  he  was  present  with  his  father  when 
he  drove  the  Earl  of  Athol  from  the  siege  of  Kilblane,  and  afterwards  killed  the- 
Earl  and  most  of  those  who  were  with  him,  taking  several  prisoners.  And  when 
the  English  sent  two  great  armies  into  Scotland,  under  command  of  the  Earl  of- 
Montfort  and  Richard  Talbot,  he  routed  them,  and  took  their  general  prisoner, 
anno  1337.  He  besieged  the  town  of  Perth,  kept  out  by  Thomas  Ritter  for  the- 
English,  anno  1340,  and  took  it  after  a  dangerous  siege  ;  and,  after  many  glorious 
exploits,  he  was  killed  at  the  battle  of  Durham,  where  King  David  was  taken - 
prisoner  by  the  English,  anno  1346.  The  eldest  son.  Sir  William,  afore-men- 
tioned, having  died  childless  before  his  father,  the  next  Marischal  was  his  bro- 
ther. 

XV.  Sir  Edward  Keith.  He  married  a  lady  of  his  own  name,  called,  in  a- 
charter  of  the  eighteenth  of  King  David's  reign,  Bomina  Isabella  Keith;  but  of 
what  family  she  was  is  not  known,  unless  it  be  that  of  Galviston,  mentioned  by- 
John  Major.  He  had  by  her  two  sons.  Sir  Edward,  who  succeeded,  and  Sir  John, 
who  married  Mary  Cheyne,  sole  daughter  and  heiress  of  Reynald  Cheyne,  Laird  of- 
Inverugie,  Strabock,  &.c.  about  the  year  1380. 


APPENDIX,  5 

This  branch  of  the  family  contiiuicd  for  several  generations,  and  carried  for  their 
arms  (a^  m  James  Lspiia,  Mat chmont- Herald,  his  Uluminaad  Book  of  Avtrn), irifait, 
a  chief  paly  of  ■  ix  pieces,  ^a/cj- and  or,  within  a  bordure  ingrailcd  stMe.  This  John 
of  Inverugie,  his  great  giandchild,  Sir  Patrick  K.eilh  of  Invenigie,  married  the 
Lord  Graham's  daughter,  and  with  her  had  several  children.  The  second  son  of 
that  marriage  was  Gilbert  Keith,  who  raanied  a  daughter  of  Ogston  of  Ludqu- 
hairn,  of  whoiii  is  lineally  descended  Sir  William  Keith,  Baronet,  present  Gover- 
nor of  Pennsylvania,  who  bears  for  his  arms,  arj.:nt,  a  cross  croi^lct  ^tche,  and  an 
escalop  in  fesse  aza/^,  on  a  chief  ^u/fx,  three  pallets  or;  as  in  the  Lyon  Regis- 
ter. 

XVL  Sir  Edward  Keith  Marischal,  the  second  of  that  name,,  was  by  King- 
Robert  n.  created  Lord  Keith,  about  the  year  1380,  as  appears  from  chiirtcrs  jTJt 
extant  in  that  family  ;  all  his  progenitors  being  made  knights  on  account  of  thtir 
Cilice.  We  have  no  certain  account  whom  he  married;  only  by  a  note  of  the  ini- 
tial letters  of  all  the  chiefu  of  this  family,  and  their  ladies,  painted  in  a  hall  in  tiie 
Castle  of  Dunotter,  we  find  her  pointed  out  thus,  D.  M.  M.  By  her,  he  had 
Lord  William,  who  succeeded,  and  Janet,  who  married  Sir  David  Hanrilton,  p-e- 
decessor  to  the  Duke  of  Hamilton. 

XVIL  William  Lord  Keith  Marischal  married  Margaret  Eraser,  daughter  and 
heiress  of  Sir  John  Eraser  of  Cowie,  with  whom  he  obtained  a  great  Cbtate  in  the 
shire  of  Kincardine,  and  elsewhere.  He  made  a  very  great  figure  under  King 
David  Bruce.  In  the  year  1369  he  was  appointed  one  of  the  commissioners  on 
the  part  of  Scotbnd,  to  treat  with  the  English  touching  a  peace  betwixt  the  two 
realms  ;  which  was  concluded  by  them,  as  in  Rymer's  Fcedera  Anglia.  With  hi* 
lady,  Margaret  Eraser,  he  had  three  sons  and  a  daughter;  the  eldest,.  John,  a  man 
of  great  valour,  was  at  the  battle  of  Otterburn  ;  he  took  his  father's  post  as  Ma- 
rischal, he  being  then  indisposed ;  and,  after  James  Earl  of  Douglas,  General  of 
the  Scots  army,  fell  in  the  battle,  took  upon  him  the  chief  command,  defeated  the 
Enghsh,  and  brought  home  with  him  Henry  Hotspur,  Earl  of  Northumberland, 
prisoner.  He  married  a  sister  of  King  Robert  III.  (who,  in  a  charter  belonging  to 
the  family,  yet  extant,  calls  him,  Dilecttim  fiUum  nostrum  Joannem  de  Keith)  by 
whom  he  had  a  son  called  Robert,  who  married,  and  left  only  one  daughter,  Eliza- 
beth, who  married  the  Lord  Gordon  :  but  both  he  and  his  father  died  before  his 
grandfather,  William  Lord  Keith. 

The  said  William  Lord  Keith's  second  son  was  nametl  Robert.  I  have  seen  a 
charter  granted  to  him  by  his  said  father,  and  Margaret  Eraser  his  spouse,  of  the 
barony  of  Strachan,  in  the  sherifldom  of  Kincardine,  of  date  loth  December  1375, 
which  ends  thus,  "  In  cujus  rei  testimonium  sigilla  nostra  consimiliter  sunt  appensa." 
Upon  the  seal  there  were  three  semi-cirlces  meeting  together,  and  within  them 
three  shields  in  triangle  :  that  on  the  ri girt  belonged  to  Keith  Marischal,  having  a, 
chief  paly  of  six  pieces,  and  on  that  above  six  cinquefoils,  disposed  3,  2,  and  i, 
which  was  his  lady's  Margaret  Eraser;  the  third  shield  on  the  left  hand  had  other 
figures,  which  were  defaced :  Upon  what  account  it  was  carried  I  know  not.  This 
seal  I  caused  engrave  on  the  first  copperplate  in  my  Essay  on  the  Ancient  and 
Modern  Use  of  Armories,  page  56.  This  Sir  Robert  married  the- heiress  of  Troup 
of  that  Ilk,  and  carried  for  his  arms  these  of  the  family,  quartered  with  azure,  a. 
garb  betwixt  three  falcons'  heads  or.  He  died  also  before  his  father,  and  left  a  son, 
William,  w-ho  enjoyed  the  estate  and  honours  of  the  family. 

Lord  William's  third  son  was  Alexander  Keith  of  Grandham.  He  commanded; 
the  horse  against  Donald  of  the  Isles,  at  Harlaw,  in  the  year  141 1. 

Lord  William's  only  daughter  was  married  to  Robert,  Duke  of  Albany,  brother 
to  King  Robert  III.  and  Governor  of  the  kingdom,  who,  in  a  charter  granted  by 
him  to  the  said  Lord  William,  calls  him,  Dilectum  patrirm  nostrum  Willidmum  de 
Keith  ;  and  the  said  Lord's  second  son,  Dilectum  fratrem  nostrum  Robertum  de  Keith, 
Dominum  de  Troup.  The  eldest  son  of  this  marriage  was  John  Stewart,  who  was 
Earl  of  Buchan  in  Scotland.  Anno  1402,  he  commanded  the  Scots  forces  that 
were  sent  to  France,  where,  at  the  battle  of  Bouge'e,  he  defeated  and  killed  the 
Duke  of  Clarence  the  English  General.  Eor  his  good  and  seasonable  services  the 
French  King  created  him  Earl  of  Evereux,  and  Constable  of  France.  Thereafter 
be  was  killed  fighting  valiantly  at  the  battle  of  Verneuil,  in  the  year  1429 ;  and 


0  APPENDIX. 

left  issue  only  one  daughter,  Jean,  who  was  married  to  George  Seaton  of  that  Ilk, 
one  of  the  progenitors  of  the  Earls  of  Winton;  for  which  that  noble  family 
have  ever  since  quartered  the  arms  of  Buchan  with  their  own.  WilHam  Lord 
Keith  disponed  several  lands  to  this  John  Earl  of  Buchan,  whom  he  calls,  Claris- 
simo  nepoti  nostra  Joanni  Scnescallo  Domino  de  Buchan,  Camerario  Scotia,  terras  de 
Tmch-Fraser,  Drippis,  iJc.  together  with  the  office  of  Sheriff-Principal  of  Stir- 
ling, anno  1407. 

This  Lord  William  died  about  the  year  141a,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  grand- 
son. 

XVIII.  William  Lord  Keith  Marischal.  He  married  Elizabeth  Lindsay,  daugh- 
ter to  the  Earl  of  Crawford,  by  whom  he  had  four  sons,  R  ,bert,  William,  John, 
and  Alexander ;  Robert  married  Kathenne  Seaton,  daughter  to  the  Lord  Seaton  : 
he  died  before  his  father,  leaving  only  one  daughter,  nmrried  to  the  Master  of  Gray ; 
and  his  second  son  William  succeeded. 

XIX.  William,  the  fourth  lord  of  this  family,  was,  by  the  favour  of  King 
James  II.  created  Earl,  by  the  title  of  the  ancient  hereditary  office  in  the  family, 
anno  1455.  He  married  Margaret  Hamilton,  daughter  to  James  Lord  Hamilton  ; 
by  her  he  had  a  son  ijamed  Wilham,  and  a  daughter,  Janet,  married  to  Johrv 
Leshe,  grandson  and  heir  apparent  to  George  first  Earl  of  Rothes,  but  had  no 
issue. 

XX.  William,  second  Earl  Marischal,  succeeded  his  father  in  the  honours  and 
offices  of  the  family,  and  a  vast  estate.  Amidst  the  confusions  of  King  James  III. 
his  reign,  he  acted  a  most  wise  and  steady  course,  and  so  tempered  his  duty  to  that 
unfortunate  prince,  with  his  love  to  his  country,  that  he  endeavoured,  by  all  means- 
possible,  to  preserve  the  person  and  honour  of  the  one,  and  the  interest  of  the  other. 
He  was  of  a  calm  temper,  profound  judgment,  and  inviolable  honesty  ;  always  for 
moderation  and  extinguishing  divisions:  and  from  the  ordinary  expression  he  made 
use  of  in  giving  counsel,  he  was  called,  hearken,  and  take  heed.  He  married  Eli- 
zabeth Gordon,  daughter  to  Alexander  first  Earl  of  Huntly,  by  whom  he  had  se- 
veral children,  whereof  one,  named  Alexander,  got  a  charter  of  the  lands  of  Pit- 
tendrum,  &.C.  anno  1513  ;  and  of  him  are  lineally  descended  Alexander  Keith, 
late  Sheriff-Depute  of  the  Mearns,  Mr  Robert  Keith,  Minister  of  the  Gospel,  pre- 
sently residing  in  Edinburgh,  and  Alexander  Keith,  Writer  there. 

Robert,  the  eldest  son  of  the  said  William  Earl  Marischal,  was  at  the  battle  of 
Flodden,  where  he  left  Sir  William  Keith  of  Inverugie,  Sir  John  Keith  of  Ludqu- 
hairn,  with  other  friends  killed  in  that  battle.  He  married  Beatrix  Douglas, 
daughter  of  John  Earl  of  Morton,  by  whom  he  had  Wilham  who  was  heir  to  his 
grandfather,  and  Robert  Abbot  of  Deer,  of  whom  was  Lord  Dingwall,  in  the 
time  of  King  James  VI.  who  carried  (as  in  Espline,  his  Illuminated  Book  of 
Arms)  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  Keith,  second  and  third  gules,  a  lion  rampant 
argent ;  supported  on  the  dexter  by  a  deer,  proper,  and,  on  the  sinister,  by  a  bear, 
proper  ;  crest,  a  deer's  head  and  neck  issuing  out  of  the  wreath  :  motto,  Memento 
creatorem. 

Earl  William's  daughters  were,  Elizabeth,  married  to  George  Earl  of  Huntly  ; 
Janet,  to  George  Lord  Glammis;  and  Agnes,  to  Sir  Archibald  Douglas  of  Glen- 
bervie. 

When  John  Duke  of  Albany,  Governor  of  the  kingdom,  went  to  France,  to  re- 
new the  league  with  Francis  I.  anno  1520,  William  Earl  Marischal  had  the  cus- 
tody of  the  young  king,  James  V.  in  the  Castle  of  Edinburgh  ;  in  which  trust  he 
behaved  so  well  during  the  governor's  absence,  that  the  king  had,  all  his  lifetime, 
a  great  love  to  him,  and  granted  to  him  many  charters  of  his  lands,  with  great 
privileges  and  jurisdictions.     To  him  succeeded 

XXI.  William,  third  Earl  Marischal,  his  grandchild,  who  was  one  of  the 
greatest  men  of  his  age,  for  his  personal  parts  and  merits  :  he  married  Margaret 
Keith,  daughter  and  heiress  to  Sir  William  Keith  of  Inverugie,  with  whom  he  got 
an  opulent  fortune  ;  and  with  her  had  two  sons  and  two  daughters.  He  was  at  the 
bloody  battle  of  Pinky,  anno  1547,  where  he  carried  with  him  all  his  friends  and 
followers  who  were  of  age  and  fit  for  arms,  of  whom  he  lost  severals.  His  eldest 
son  WilHam,  called  then  Master  of  Marischal,  was  taken  prisoner  at  this  battle, 
with  the  Earl   of  Huntly  then  Chancellor,  and  other  persons  of  quality.     The 


APPENDIX.  7 

Master  of  Marischal  was  detained  prisoner  till  ransomed  for  L.  2000  Sterling.  He 
had  to  wife  Elizabeth  Hay,  daughter  to  George  Hay  of  Errol,  anno  1543;  died  be- 
fore his  father,  leaving  a  son,  George,  afterwards  Earl  Marischal ;  and  daugh- 
ters, Mary,  married  to  Sir  Robert  Arbuthnot  of  that  Ilk  ;  Barbara,  to  Alexander 
Forbes  of  Pitsligo  ;  Mary,  to  William  Keith  of  Ludquhairn,  and  had  issue.  VVil 
liam  Earl  Marischal's  second  son  was  Robert,  commendator  of  Deer,  who  had,  by 
the  special  favour  of  King  James  the  VI.  that  abbacy  erected  to  liim  in  a  tempo- 
ral lordship,  by  the  title  of  Lord  Altree.  His  achievement  (illuminated  in  the  book 
of  James  Esplin,  Marchmont-Herald)  is  thus,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  oi\  a 
saltier  and  chief  joules;  second  and  third,  argent,  a  chief  paly  of  six  pieces,  gales 
and  or ;  supported  on  the  dexter  by  an  unicorn  argent,  horned  and  unguled  or  ; 
and  on  the  sinister  by  a  deer,  proper :  crest,  a  rock  proper,  with  the  motto.  Watch 
the  temptation.  He  married  Elizabeth  Lundie,  daughter  and  heiress  of  Robert 
Lundie  of  Benholm,  by  whom  he  had  one  daughter,  Margaret,  married  to  John 
Erskine  of  Dun:  So  the  peerage  failed,  and  his  estate  fell  to  the  family  of  Mari- 
schal. William  Earl  Marischal,  last  mentioned,  attended  Queen  Mary  upon  his 
own  charge  to  France,  and  was  chosen  by  the  Qiieen  and  kingdom  one  of  the 
twelve  peers,  by  whose  counsel  the  affairs  of  the  kingdom  were  to  be  managed. 
He  was  most  zealous  for  the  Reformation,  but  against  all  irregular  proceedings  in 
that  affair.  When  the  Confession  of  Faith  was  presented  to  the  Parliament  156c, 
the  Earl  Marischal  stood  up  and  said,  "  It  is  long  since  I  carried  some  favour  to 
"  the  truth,  and  was  somewhat  zealous  for  the  P^oman  Religion  ;  but  this  day 
"  hath  fully  resolved  me  of  the  truth  of  the  one  and  falsehood  of  the  other  :  For. 
"  seeing  (my  Lords)  the  bishops,  who,  by  their  learning,  can,  and  for  the  zeal  they 
"  should  have  for  the  truth,  would,  as  I  suppose,  gainsay  any  thing  repugnant  to 
"  it,  say  nothing  against  the  Confession  we  have  heard  :  I  cannot  think  but  it  is 
"  the  truth  of  God,  and  the  contrary  of  it  false  and  detestable  doctrine."  Where- 
upon the  Confession  was  approven  and  authori-ied,  and  the  Reformation  settled. 

Earl  William's  two  daughters,  Anne  and  Jane,  the  first  was  married  first  to  James 
Earl  of  Murray,  natural  brother  to  Qiieen  Mary,  anno  1563,  to  whom  she  had  two 
daughters ;  the  eldest  of  which,  Isabel,  was  married  to  James  Stewart  Lord  Doune. 
and  their  eldest  son  James  was  Earl  of  Murray,  in  right  of  his  mother.  Again, 
she  was  married  to  Colin  Earl  of  Argyle,  to  whom  she  bare  Archibald  Earl  of  Ar- 
gyle,  Colin  Laird  of  Lundie,  and  two  daughters.  Mary,  the  second  daughter  ct" 
James  Earl  of  Murray,  was  married  to  Francis  Earl  of  Errol.  Earl  William's  se- 
cond daughter,  Lady  Jean,  was  married  to  John  Lord  Glammis,  to  whom  she  had 
two  sons,  viz.  John  Lord  Glammis,  who  was  Chancellor  of  Scotland,  and  Sir 
Thomas  Lyon  of  Oldbar,  Captain  of  the  King'  Guards,  and  Lord  High  Treasurer; 
and  a  daughter,  Margaret,  married  first  to  the  Earl  of  Cassilis,  and  afterwards  to 
James  Marquis  of  Hamilton. 

This  Earl  William,  by  living  a  retired  fife  at  Dunotter,  and  shunning  all  pub 
lie  affairs  but  his  own,  (whence  he  came  to  be  called  among  the  vulgar,  IFilIiani. 
of  the  Tower)  very  much  improved  his  estate,  so  that  at  his  death  it  was  reckoned 
270,000  merks  a-year ;  and  so  situate,  that  from  the  northmost  part  of  Caithness 
to  the  English  borders  he  could  lodge  still  on  his  own  ground.  Mr  George  Buch- 
anan being  by  the  Earl  refused  the  purchase  of  a  piece  of  land,  said  to  have  of  old 
belonged  to  some  of  his  relations,  as  is  vulgarly  reported  in' the  family,  threatened 
revenge,  which  he  seems  to  have  performed  by  his  profound  silence  through  all 
hi'  history  of  this  noble  family,  and  their  heroic  actions.  The  earl  died  in  a  good 
old  age,  the  7th  of  October  1581,  and  was  succeeded  in  his  estate  and  honours  by 
his  grandson. 

XXII.  George  Earl  Marischal,  who  was,  by  the  care  of  his  grandfather,  well 
brought  up  ;  and,  for  the  further  improvement  of  his  education,  was  sent  abroad 
with  his  brother  William,  where  he  studied  under  the  best  masters,  particularly  the 
famous  Beza  at  Geneva,  where  his  brother,  a  gentleman  of  promising  greatness,  was 
ur. happily  kilkd  in  a  scuffle  or  tumult  among  the  citizens  much  regretted,  and  even 
by  Theodore  Beza  in  his  writings.  After  Lord  George  had  left  Geneva,  he  travelled 
through  Italy,  and  in  Germany,  where  he  visited  the  Landgrave  of  Hesse,  Prince 
of  the  Chatti,  who,  understanding  who  he  was.  and  of  his  descent,  received  him 
kindly  with  all  magnificence,  as  descended  of  the  Chatti.  I  shall  here  add  what 
Vol.  II.  4  I 


!5  APPENDIX. 

Mr  Smith  says  in  his  printed  oration  on  this  pojnt,  for  which  he  cites  history  : 
"  Potentissimiis  Plessise  Lantgravius,  qui  adhuc  inter  familia;  suae  decora  Pnnci- 
"  pis  Chattorum,  (qui  semel  Germanico  submisere)  titulum  retinet,  Georgio 
"  Comiti  Marischallo,  Germania  peregnnanti,  communem  stirpem  &.  cognati- 
"  onem  officiose  agnovit,  &-  summo  studio  excoluit."  After  seven  years  travel  he 
returned  to  his  native  country  with  great  reputation,  and  was  made  a  privy  coun- 
sellor, and  his  majesty's  lieutenant  in  the  north.  And  in  the  year  1589  was 
sent  ambassador  extraordinary  to  Denmark,  to  espouse  Anne,  a  daughter  of  that 
crown,  in  name  of  Kmg  James  VI.  in  which  he  appeared  with  all  the  lustre  the 
wealth  of  Scotland  could  adorn  him;  all  or  most  being  upon  his  ov/n  proper 
charges.  These  who  attended  him  were  Andrew  Keith  Lord  Dingwall,  Sir 
Ja.nes  Scrimgeour  of  Dudhope,  Mr  John  Skene,  the  King's  Advocate,  and  Mr 
George  Young,  Archdean  of  St  Andrews.  After  this  embassy,  most  honourably 
discharged  by  him,  the  king  received  him  graciously,  and  esteemed  him  very 
much  as  a  man  to  be  relied  on  in  the  point  of  honour  and  fidehty,  as  appears  by 
an  act  of  his  Maje?ty's  Privy  Council,  of  date  the  25th  of  November  1589,  where 
he  exoners  and  discharges  him  with  much  thankfulness ;  a  part  of  which  1  shall 
here  insert.  "  And  for  that  the  abbacy  of  Deer,  being  erected  by  his  Majesty  in 
"  a  temporal  lordship,  was  by  his  highness  disponed  to  his  said  cousin,  and  incor- 
"  porate  in  h;s  said  earldom,  in  consideration  of  his  designation  at  that  time  for  the 
•'  said  service,  and  the  exorbitant  expences  which  the  honourable  discharge  there- 
"  of  would  crave  and  put  him  to,  which  now  it  has  pleased  God  to  etfec- 
"  tuate  by  his  means :  Therefore  his  Majesty,  and  Lords  foresaid,  have  declared, 
"  and  by  the  tenor  of  this  present  act,  declare  his  highness's  cousin  foresaid,  to 
"  have  honourably,  dutifully,  and  to  his  greatest  charges  and  expences,  eftected 
"  and  fulfilled  the  cause  and  motive  of  the  said  erection  and  union  specified  in  his 
"  infeftment.  And  tliat,  in  the  performance  thereof,  he  has  most  worthily  de- 
"  served  the  foresaid  benefit,  in  a  perpetual  monument  of  his  said  service,  to  him 
"  and  his  forever:  Promising,  in  that  respect,  in  his  highness's  princely  and  in- 
"  violable  word,  to  cause  this  said  discharge  and  declaration  to  be  confirmed  and 
"  ratified  by  his  highness's  three  estates  in  the  nest  Parliament.  And  ordaining, 
"  in  the  mean  time,  this  present  act  to  be  insert  and  registrate  in  the  books  of 
"  of  secret  council,  ad  perpetuam  rei  memoriam." 

In  the  year  1593,  his  Lordship  made  a  noble  foundation  of  a  College  at  Aber- 
deen, which  he"  endowed  with  sufficient  funds  towards  the  support  and  mainte- 
nance of  a  Principal  and  four  Professors  of  Philosophy  :  And  though  other  profes- 
sors have  been  since  added,  by  the  piety  and  bounty  of  other  great  and  learned 
men,  yet  the  Earls  Marischal  are  perpetual  patrons  of  this  college,  which  bears 
their  name,  being  the  first  founders.  And  by  the  seal  of  the  college,  the  arms  of 
the  family  are  marshalled  with  that  of  the  town  of  Aberdeen  thus:  first  and  fourth, 
argent  on  a  chief,  three  pales ^///w,  for  Keith  ;  second  and  third,  gules,  a  tower  em- 
battled argent ;  crest,  the  sun  in  his  glory,  with  the  word  luceo  ;  and  the  legend 
rond  the  seal.  Insignia  Academ.  Marischal.  Abredon.  The  Earl  being  the  first 
founder  of  the  college,  where  many  learned  men  of  all  professions  have  been  edu- 
cate, his  memory,  on  that  account,  ought  to  be  always  honoured  by  all  lovers  of 
learning,  with  that  gratitude  and  respect  which  so  signal  a  piece  of  service  to  his 
country  and  posterity  deserves.  King  James  the  VI.  when  in  England,  conferred 
upon  him  the  highest  mark  of  honour  of  which  a  subject  could  be  capable,  cloth- 
ed him  with  royal  authority  ;  so  that  he  was  High  Commissioner  or  Viceroy  to 
the  Parliament  of  Scotland,  anno  1609.  And  after  he  had  served  his  king  and 
country  in  many  eminent  stations,  mostly  upon  his  own  charges,  his  estate  being 
one  of  the  best  in  Scotland,  he  died  at  his  castle  of  Dunotter  the  2d  of  April  1623, 
aged  70  years. 

This  noble  lord  married  first  Margaret,  daughter  of  Alexander  Lord  Home,  by 
whom  he  had  William  his  successor,  and  a  daughter  Anne,  married  to  William 
Earl  of  Morton,  idly,  Margaret,  daughter  of  James  Lord  Ogilvie,  by  whom  he 
had  Sir  Robert  Keithof  Benholm. 

XXIII.  Earl  William  succeeded  his  father  Earl  George.  King  Charles  I.  find- 
ing him  a  man  of  great  honour  and  fidelity,  called  him  to  his  Privy  Council,  where 
he  carried  himself  very  well  in  every  thing  relating  to  the  crown  and  to  the  go- 


APPENDIX.  9 

vernment,  in  church  and  state.  He  died  in  the  prime  of  his  age,  the  28th  of 
October  1635,  leaving  issue  by  Mary  his  wile,  daughter  of  John  Earl  of  Man 
and  his  lady,  Mary  Stewart,  daughter  to  the  Duke  of  Lennox  and  Richmond, 
three  sons,  William  and  George,  both  Earls  Marischal  successively,  and  John,  who, 
for  saving  the  iionoius  of  the  kingdom  from  the  hands  of  tlie  English,  was  by  King 
Ciuirles  11.  created  Knight  Marischal,  and  afterwards  Earl  of  Kintore,  of  whom 
immediately. 

XXIV.  Which  William  Earl  Marischal,  in  the  time  of  the  civil  vnars,  adhered 
to  the  king ;  and  upon  his  own  charges  levied  a  troop  of  horse  for  his  majesty's 
service,  and  marclied  with  others  for  the  king's  liberation,  in  tlie  year  1645J,  to 
Preston,  vihere  the  king's  army  was  defeated,  and  he  hardly  escaped  with  his  life, 
returned  to  Dunotter  Castle,  where,  in  the  year  1650,  he  entertained  King  Charles 
II.  with  the  Duke  of  Buckmgham,  and  other  persons  of  quality,  and  aitendcd  on 
his  Maj^'siy  all  the  time  he  was  in  Scotland,  and  designed  to  have  accompanied 
him  to  England,  but  the  king  commanded  him  to  stay  at  home  with  the  Earls  of 
Crawford  and  Gleiicarin,  to  govern  the  nation.  And  when  some  of  the  king's  friends 
had  assembled  at  Elliot,  in  Angus,  for  concerting  measures  to  support  the  royal  cause, 
they  were  surprised  by  a  great  body  of  English  horse,  and  the  Earl  Marischal, 
with  some  ochers.  sent  prisoners  to  the  Tower  of  London  by  sea;  where,  after  ten 
years  imprisonment,  sustained  with  great  firmness  and  constancy,  though  the 
English  possessed*  his  estate,  and  allowed  him  no  maintenance,  except  what  he  re- 
ceived from  his  mother  the  Countess  Marischal,  he  lived  t^o  see  the  happy  Resto- 
ration of  King  Charles,  and  to  receive  some  reward  of  his  merit;  for  the  king  made 
him  first  a  Privy  Counsellor,  and  afterwards  Lord  Privy  Seal :  which  office  he  dis- 
charged to  his  death,  nnno  1671.  He  mamed  first  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  George 
Earl  of  Winton,  by  whom  he  had  three  daughters,  Margaret,  married  to  Sir  James 
H  .pe  of  Hopetoun,  and  again  to  Sir  Archibald  Murray  of  Blackbarony  ;  Mary,  to 
Robert  Viscount  of  Arbuthnot,  and  Jean,  to  George  Lord  Bantf.  '^dly.  He  mar- 
ried Anna,  aaughter  of  Robert  Earl  of  Morton,  but  by  her  he  had  no  issue. 

XXV.  To  William  Earl  Marischal  succeeded  George  Keith  his  brother,  who 
had  oeen  a  colonel  in  Frraice ;  a  person  of  undaunted  courage,  a  great  loyalist, 
anrl  sufferer  for  the  royal  cause.  He  married  Mary,  daughter  to  the  Earl  of  Kin- 
noul,  by  whom  he  had  only  one  son,  who  succeeded  him ;  and  he  died  at  Inveru- 
gie  in  the  year  1694. 

XXVI.  William  succeeded  his  father  Earl  George,  a  nobleman  of  a  great  and 
active  spirit,  a  clear  and  penetrating  judgment,  a  ready  wit,  and  easy  and  lovely 
expression,  magnificent  and  noble  in  his  way  of  living,  generous  and  liberal,  strict- 
ly just  in  his  deahngs,  firm  to  his  principles,  bountiful  to  his  servants,  zealous  to- 
support  those  that  depended  upon  him,  compassionate  and  charitable  to  those  that 
were  in  distress,  a  great  patron  of  learning,  and  lover  of  the  welfare  of  his  country. 
He  was  very  opposite  to  the  Union  of  the  kingdoms :  For,  besides  what  other 
reasons  he  might  have  for  his  opposition,  he  thought  his  family  might  suffer  by 
the  suppressing  his  heritable  office  of  Great  Marischal  of  Scotland  ;  with  relation 
to  which  he  entered  a  protestation  m  Parliament,  before  the  conclusion  of  the 
Union,  in  these  words,  (which  1  take  from  the  ingenious  Mr  Crawford,  his  Peerage 
of  Scotland)  "  I  do  hereby  protest,  that  whatever  is  contained  in  any  article  of 
"  the  treaty  of  Union  betwixt  Scotland  and  England,  shall  in  no  manner  of  way 
"  derogate  from,  or  be  prejudicial  to  me  or  my  successors,  in  our  heritable  office 
"  of  Great  Marischal  of  Scotland,  in  all  time  coming;  or  in  the  full  and  free  en- 
"  joyment  and  exercise  of  the  whole  rights,  dignities,  titles,  honours,  powers, 
"  and  privileges  thereto  belonging,  which  my  ancestors  and  I  have  possessed  and 
"  exercised,  as  rights  of  property  these  700  years.  And  ]  do  further  protest, 
"  That  the  Parliament  of  Scotland,  and  constitution  thereof,  may  remain  and 
"  continue  as  formerly.  And  1  desire  this  my  protestation  to  be  inserted  in  the 
"  minutes,  and  recorded  in  the  books  of  Parliament  i  and  thereupon  I  take  in- 
"  struments." 

The  Earl  died  the  27th  day  of  May  17 12,  leaving  issue  by  Mary  his  wife,  daugh- 
ter of  James  Earl  of  Perth,  George  his   successor,  James   Keith,  Esquire,  Lady 
Mary,  married  to  John  Earl  of  Wigton,  and  Lady  Anne  Keith,  married  to  Alex- 
ander Lord  Gairlies,  eldest  son  to  the  Earl  of  Galloway. 
2 


xo  APPENDIX. 

XXVII.  Which  George  being  a  young  nobleman  of  very  bright  parts,  succeed- 
ed his  father  Earl  William.  His  genius  leading  him  to  a  military  life,  when  he 
was  Lord  Keith,  and  only  a  youth,  Queen  Anne  gave  him  a  troop  of  horse,  and 
then  preferred  him  to  be  Captain  of  her  Majesty's  Guards  ;  in  which  post  he  con- 
tinued, till,  some  time  after  the  accession  of  King  George  to  the  crown,  his  Lord- 
ship was  removed,  and  his  command  given  to  another. 

The  achievement  armorial  of  this  noble  family  has  always  been  carried  plain, 
without  being  composed  or  marshalled  with  any  other  arms,  having  only  the  pater- 
nal arms  of  Keith,  upon  the  occasion  before-mentioned,  viz.  argent,  a  chief  paly 
of  six  pieces,  or  and  gules,  adorned  with  crown,  helmet,  and  manthng,  suitable 
to  their  quality  ;  and  upon  a  wreath  of  their  tinctures  (and  sometimes  in  place  of 
the  wreath,  a  ducal  coronet)  for  crest,  a  hart's  head  erased  proper,  armed  with  ten 
tynes,  or;  supporters,  two  harts  proper,  armed  as  the  crest  :  and  for  motto,  Veri- 
tas vincit.  Behind  the  shield,  two  battons  gules,  seine  of  thistles  or,  ensigned  on 
the  tops  with  imperial  crowns  placed  saltier-ways,  as  badges  of  the  office  of  High 
Marischal  of  Scotland. 


KEITH,  Earl  of  Kintore. 


THE  first  of  this  family  (as  I  have  said  before)  was  Sir  John  Keith,  third  son  ot 
William  Earl  Marischal,  by  the  Lady  Mary  Erskine  his  wife,  daughter  of  John  Earl 
of  Marr,  and  his  Lady,  Mary  Stewart,  sister  to  Ludovick  Duke  of  Lennox  and  Rich- 
mond ;  who  was  very  assisting  in  preserving  the  regalia  of  Scotland  (the  crown, 
sword  and  sceptre)  from  falling  into  the  hands  of  OHver  Cromwell.  Before  the 
Castle  of  Dunotter  (whether  they  had  been  conveyed  from  the  Castle  of  Edinburgh 
for  security)  was  surrendered  to  the  English  army,  they  were  privately  conveyed 
forth  thereof,  and  deposited  under  ground  in  the  church  of  King- Kenneth,  (common- 
ly called  KineiT)  about  four  miles  distant,  by  some  trusty  persons,  and  Sir  John 
went  abroad,  and  from  thence  (according  to  concert)  wrote  to  his  friends  in  Scot- 
land, that  he  was  safely  arrived  with  the  regalia.  This  letter  was  industriously 
suifered  to  fall  into  the  hands  of  the  English,  who,  thereupon,  gave  over  all  hopes 
of  finding  them.  In  consideration  whereof,  and  of  his  singular  loyalty  and  faith- 
ful services  to  King  Charles  II.  he  was,  upon  the  restoration  of  that  monarch,  anno 
i66o,  created  Knight  Marischal;  which  dignity  is  entailed  upon  his  family,  with 
a  pension  suitable  to  the  office,  and  got  a  coat  of  augmentation,  with  the  regalia, 
added  to  his  paternal  bearing,  as  in  the  following  blazon.  Afterwards  his  majesty 
called  him  to  his  council,  and  honoured  him  with  the  title  of  Earl  of  Kintore, 
Lord  Keith  of  Inverury  and  Keith-hall,  on  the  26th  of  June  1677.  And  there- 
after was  made  Lord  Treasurer-Depute,  and  one  of  the  Lords  of  his  Majesty's 
Privy  Council,  in  the  year  1682.  In  which  office  he  was  continued  f-.ll  the  tiea- 
sury  was  turned  into  a  commission  some  time  after  King  James  his  accession  to  the 
throne. 

He  married  Margaret,  daughter  to  Thomas  Earl  of  Haddington,  by  whom  he 
had  William  Lord  Inverury,  his  eldest  son  and  heir,  with  several  others,  who  died 
without  issue,  and  two  daughters,  Jean  and  Margaret,  the  first  married  to  Sir  Wil- 
liam Forbes  of  Monymusk,  and  the  second  to  Gavin  Hamilton  of  Raploch. 

Which  William  (a  man  of  valour  and  entire  loyalty  to  his  death)  succeeded 
his  father  in  the  above  estate  and  honours.  He  married  Katharine,  daughter  to 
David  Viscount  of  Stormont,  and  had  with  her  two  sons,  John,  his  eldest  son 
and  successor  (the  present  Earl  of  Kintore)  and  William;  and  two  daughters.  Lady 
Katharine,  married  to  David  Falconer  of  Newton,  now  Lord  Halkerton ;  and  Lady 
Jean, 

The  achievement  of  this  noble  family,  I  have  mentioned  several  times  before, 
and  shall  here  again  add  its  blazon,  viz.  quarterly,  first  and  fourth,  gules,  a  sceptre 
and  sword  saltier-ways,  with  an  imperial  crown  in  chief,  all  proper,  within  an  .  lie 
of  eight  thistles  or,  as  a  coat  of  augmentation  for  preserving  of  the  regalia.  Se- 
cond and  thud  argent,  a  chief  paly  of  six  pieces,  gules  and  or,  the  paternal  coat 


APPENDIX.  II 

of  Keith ;  which  arms  are  supported  by  two  chevaliers  completely  armed,  with 
pikes  in  rheii  huiiJs,  all  proper;  and  tor  crest,  an  aged  lady  tVom  tiie  middle  up- 
wards, holding  in  her  right  hand  u  garland  of  laurel,  proper :  motto,  :^ia:  amissa 
salva. 


Of  the  fajiily  of  DUNDAS  of  that  Ilk,  and  their  descendants. 


The  achievement  of  this  family,  by  their  seals  of  arms,  and  our  old  records  of 
blazons,  is  argent,  a  lion  rampant  gules :  crest,  a  lion  full-faced  issuing  out  of  an 
oak  bush,  proper,  with  the  the  motto,  Essajez  ;  supporters,  two  lions,  and  below 
the  shield  a  salamander  in  flames  of  tire,  all  proper. 

The  first  of  this  ancient  family  of  the  surname  of  Dundas,  in  the  shire  of  West 
Lothian,  was  Huttred,  a  younger  son  of  Cospatricius,  grandfather  to  Cospatricius 
the  first  Earl  of  Dunbar  or  March,  as  is  evident  by  comparing  Dimdas's  original 
charter,  after  inserted,  with  a  charter  granted  by  King  David  1.  to  the  abbacy  of 
Melrose,  wherein  this  Huttredus  is  designed  Fi/ii/s  Cospatricii  ;  and  he  goes  under 
the  same  designation  in  other  charters,  granted  during  the  said  reign,  wherein  he 
is  witness.  This  charter  of  Melrose  is  found  recorded  among  the  chartularies  of 
that  abbacy,  now  kept  in  the  Library  of  the  Faculty  of  Advocates  at  Edinburgh  ; 
and  the  principal  charter  is  in  the  hands  of  Mr  James  Anderson,  Writer  to  the  Sig- 
net, that  learned  antiquary. 

HurTRED  got  from  his  father  the  lands  of  Dundas,  from  whence  the  family 
afterwards  took  their  surname,  when  surnames  came  to  be  used  ;  and  they  also 
took  the  arms  of  the  family  of  Cospatricius  Comes,  to  show  their  original,  with  a 
suitable  difference  used  at  that  time,  by  transmutation  of  the  tinctures,  and 
wanting  the  bordure  of  eight  roses,  which  was  peculiar  to  that  noble  family,  being 
given  to  them  by  our  kings  for  tlreir  maintaining  the  peace  of  the  Borders.  The 
first  of  the  family  of  Home,  descended  of  another  younger  son  of  the  Earls  of 
March,  did  also  distinguish  their  arms  from  the  chief  family,  by  only  changing  the 
tincture  of  the  field,  as  I  have  observed  before,  and  in  the  chapter  of  Marks  of 
Cadency. 

Helias  de  Dundas  succeeded  his  father  Huttred,  and  for  establishing  his  right 
to  the  lands,  in  the  manner  but  just  about  that  time  come  in  practice,  he  took  the 
following  charter  of  the  same  from  his  father's  eldest  brother  Waldevus,  son  to 
Cospatricius;  which  charter  I  have  seen,  and  the  same  is  in  the  charter-chest  of 
Du.ndas,  and  I  have  set  down  an  exact  copy  of  it  as  follows  :  "  WaWevus,  filius 
"  Cospatricii,  omnibus  piobis  hominibus  suis,  &  omnibus  amicis  suis  tarn  futuris 
"  quam  presentibus,  salutem,  sciatis  me  dedisse  &-  concessisse,  8^  hac  carta  mea 
"  confirmasse,  Helie  fiho  Hutredi  Dundas  pro  servitio  dimidii  militis,  ilium  et 
"  hasredes  suos  tenendum  de  me  ethieredibus  meis  in  feudo  et  haereditate,  in  moris, 
"  in  aquis,  in  stagnis,  in  inolendinis,  in  pratis,  in  pasturis,  cum  omnibus  rectis  di- 
"  visi*  et  pertinentiis,  concedo  itaque.  Qiiare  volo  et  prajcipio,  ut  iste  prtedictus 
"  Helias  istam  terram  habeat  e:  tcneat  tam  quiete  et  taiii  hbere  et  tarn  honorifice, 
"  ut  uUus  miles  de  barone  tenet,  liberius  et  quietius  et  honorificentius  in  tota 
"  terra  Regis  Scotia.  His  testibus,  Johanne  filio  Orm,  Waldevo  filio  Baldewin, 
"  Roberto  de  Sancto  Michaele,  Helia  de  Hadestandena,  Wilhelmo  do  Coupland, 
"  Wilhelmo  de   Helebet,  AlLtno  Dapifero,  Gerhardo  Milite,  Johanne  de  Graggin." 

Though  this  charter  has  no  particular  date,  as  neither  for  the  mcst  part  had 
other  old  ones  granted  about  the  time  it  was  given,  yet,  by  the  granter  and  wit- 
nesses, it  is  known  to  have  been  in  the  latter  end  of  the  reign  of  King  Alex- 
ander I.  or  in  the  beginning  of  the  reign  of  Kmd  David  I.  before  or  about 
the  year  1 124,  or  at  farthest  before  the  year  1145,  which  was  the  21st  year  of 
King  David's  reign  ;  for  Waldevus  filius  Cospatricii,  the  granter,  died  the  I2th  day 

Vol.  U.  4  K 


la  APPENDIX. 

of  July  that  year,  as  by  the  records  kept  in  the  Castle  of  Edinburgh,  and  is  ob- 
served by  Ochiltree :  And  that  the  granter  was  Waldevus,  father  to  Cospatriciut 
Comes,  and  not  Waldevus  Comes,  the  son  of  Cospatricius  Comes,  is  evident,  be- 
cause had  it  been  granted  by  the  last  Waldevus,  he  had  been  designed  Comes,  or 
^'ilius  Cospatricii  Comitis,  as  he  is  in  all  the  charters  granted  by  King  David  where- 
in he  is  mentioned  ;  particularly  in  several  charters  granted  by  that  king  to  the 
abbacy  of  Dunfermline :  for  his  father  Cospatricius  was  made  earl  in  the  lime  of 
David  I. 

And  further,  it  is  without  doubt  that  this  charter  was  granted  at  least  in  the 
reign  of  King  David,  because  the  granter,  PValdevus,  filius  Cospatricii,  gives  a 
charter  to  the  abbacy  of  Dunfermline  of  the  church  of  Inverkeithing,  wherein 
Heli.  de  Dundas  is  a  witness,  and  with  him  Duncanus  Comes,  Rob.  Avenel,  and 
Johan.  de  Graggin ;  which  Johan.  de  Graggin  is  one  of  the  witnesses  in  Dundas's 
charter,  and  the  other  persons  are  witnesses  in  charters  granted  by  king  David  to 
the  said  abbacy :  So  that  it  is  evident  the  said  Helias  de  Dundas  was  cotemporary 
with  the  foresaid  persons,  and  that  his  charter  of  Dundas  was  granted,  at  least,  in 
the  reign  of  the  said  King  David. 

The  succession  of  the  family  of  Dundas  from  the  above-mentioned  Helias  is 
lineal  and  uninterrupted ;  for  the  said  Helias  was  succeeded  by  his  son  Serle  de 
Dundas,  who  is  mentioned  in  some  of  the  transactions  of  King  William  the  Lion, 
who  began  his  reign  in  the  year  1165,  as  in  the  Collections  of  Alexander  Baillie 
of  Castlecary,  a  curious  antiquary. 

This  Serle  was  succeeded  by  his  son  Helias  de  Dundas,  who  is  mentioned  as  a 
■witness  in  a  charter  of  Philip  de  Mowbray,  of  the  lands  of  Inverkeithing,  to  the 
abbacy  of  Dunfermline,  in  the  reign  of  King  Alexander  II.  And  Sir  James  Dal- 
rymple,  in  his  Collections  of  the  Scottish  History,  page  381,  says.  He  has  met 
with  this  second  Helias  de  Dundas,  mentioned  in  an  enrolment  of  court,  by  Roger 
Mowbray,  in  the  year  1229 :  For  the  family  of  Dundas  held  a  small  parcel  of 
land  in  Dalmeny  off  the  Mowbrays  of  Barnbougle,  and  still  hold  the  same  off  the 
Earl  of  Rosebery,  as  their  successor. 

And  after  this  Helias,  says  Sir  James,  is  to  be  found  Radulphus  de  Dundas, 
who  succeeded  the  said  Helias  ;  and  which  Radulphus  is  frequently  a  witness  in 
the  charters  of  King  Alexander  III.  as  in  the  Earl  of  Haddington's  Collections. 
And  the  said  Sir  James  Dalrymple  says.  That  he  has  found  him  mentioned  in 
Registro  Calchoensi,  or  Chartularies  of  Kelso,  which  are  now  kept  in  the  Advo- 
cates' Library. 

This  Radulphus  was  succeeded  by  his  son  Saer  de  Dundas,  in  the  year  1276  ; 
he  is  found  mentioned  in  Prynne's  History  of  England,  in  the  reign  of  King  Edward 
I.     To  whom  succeeded  Hugo  de  Dundas  his  son. 

He  was  succeeded  by  his  son  Radulphus  de  Dundas.  This  second  Radulphus 
is  witness  to  a  charter,  sometime  in  Sir  James  Dalrymple's  custody,  granted  by 
King  Robert  II.  to  the  Laird  of  Maclean  ;  which  second  Radulphus  was  succeeded 
by  James  his  son  ;  and  to  this  James,  John  his  son  succeeded,  as  appears  by  the 
charters  in  the  present  Laird  of  Dundas's  custody. 

John  was  succeeded  in  his  lands  and  estate  by  James  Dundas  his  son,  whose 
son  (likewise  James)  succeeded  to  him.  This  last  mentioned  James  had  at  least 
three  sons,  James,  Archibald,  and  Duncan,  by  his  first  wife.  In  the  year  1423,  he 
was  married  to  Christian  Stewart,  daughter  to  Stewart  of  Innermeth  and  Lorn, 
his  second  wife ;  when,  by  charters  of  resignation,  (as  his  predecessors  had  for- 
merly done)  he  infefted  his  eldest  son  James,  and  his  heirs  whatsoever,  in  all  the 
lands  then  belonging  to  the  family  of  Dundas,  (Fingask  and  Dumbarnie  ex- 
cepted), and  within  a  month  thereafter  he  took  a  charter  of  resignation  of  the 
lands  of  Fingask  to  himself,  and  the  heirs-male  to  be  procreate  betwixt  him  and 
the  said  Christian  Stewart  his  spouse  ;  which  failing,  to  his  nearest  heu-s  whatso- 
ever :  And,  upon  his  death,  James  his  eldest  son  was  retoured  heir  in  special  to  his 
father  in  the  lands  of  Dumbarnie,  in  the  year  1437.  This  last  James  dying  with- 
out children,  his  brother  Archibald  (afterwards  Sir  Archibald)  Dundas  succeeded 
to  him  in  the  year  1452,  and  was  High  Sheriff  of  the  county  of  Linlithgow  in  the 
reigns  of  King  James  II.  and  III.  Sir  Archibald  married  Agnes  Borthwick, 
daughter  to  Borthwick  of  that  Ilk,  (afterwards  Lord  Borthwick)  and  had  by  her 


APPENDIX.  Si 

John  Dundas  his  son,  who,  having  been  infeft  on  charters  of  resignation  in  the 
whole  estate  of  Dundas,  (the  half  of  the  lands  of  Barnton  excepted)  was  retoured 
heir  in  special  to  his  father  Sir  Archibald  in  the  said  lands  of  Barnton,  in  the  year 
1480.     This  Sir  Archibald's  second  son  was  Lord  St  John. 

William  Dundas,  son  to  the  said  John,  was  served  heir  to  him  in  the  year 
1495.  He  married  Margaret  Wauchope,  daughter  to  Wauchope  of  Niddry,  and 
had  with  her  two  sons,  Sir  James  the  eldest,  and  William  Dundas,  predecessor  to 
the  Dundasses  of  Diiddingston. 

This  Sir  James  was  served  and  retouretl  heir  to  his  father  in  the  year  15 13. 
He  married  Dame  Margaret  Sandilands,  daughter  to  Sandilands  of  Culder,  now 
Lord  Torphichen,  and  with  her  had  a  son,  George  Dundas,  who  was  served  heir  to 
his  father  in  the  year  1554.  He  married  twice  ;  first  Elizabeth  Boswell,  daughter 
to  Boswell  of  Balmuto,  by  whom  he  had  Sir  Walter  Dundas,  who  succeeded,  and 
George,  who  died  unmarried  ;  and  next  he  married  Katharine  Oliphant,  daughter 
to  the  Lord  Oliphant,  by  whom  he  had  Sir  James  Dundas  of  Arniston. 

This  Sir  Walter  was  knighted  at  Stirling  by  King  James  VL  at  Prince  Hen- 
ry's baptism.  He  married  Dame  Anna  Monteith,  daughter  to  Monteith  of  Kerse, 
and  had  with  her  three  sons,  George,  who  succeeded  him  in  the  estate  of  Dundas, 
William  his  second,  and  Mr  Walter  his  youngest  son. 

The  said  George,  the  eldest,  married  Elizabeth  Hamilton,  daughter  to  Ha- 
milton  of  Innerwick,  and  had  with  her  three  sons,  Walter,  George,  and  James. 

Walter,  the  eldest  son  of  the  said  second  George,  married  Lady  Christian 
Leslie,  daughter  to  the  Earl  of  Leven,  and  had  with  her  three  sons,  Alexander, 
Ralph,  and  Walter ;  the  said  Walter  elder,  and  Alexander,  his  eldest  son,  died 
before  George  the  grandfather  ;  and  Ralph,  the  second  son  of  Walter  elder,  being 
prodigal,  the  said  George  the  grandfather,  who  had  the  fee  of  the  estate  still  in  his 
person,  did  entail  the  same  to  the  youngest  grandson  Walter ;  and  failing  him,  to 
his  own  second  son  George  above-  mentioned  ;  and  faihng  him,  to  the  said  James 
his  third  son,  and  their  heirs-male,  and  to  other  heirs  of  entail ;  the  said  Walter, 
the  grandson,  having  died  without  issue,  the  above-mentioned  George,  the  uncle,  is 
served  heir  of  tailzie  to  him. 

Which  George  married  Margaret  Hay,  daughter  to  Hay  of  Monkton,  and  with  her 
had  two  sons  ;  George,  who  succeeded  as  heir  of  tailzie  in  the  estate,  and  has  several 
children  by  Alison  Bruce,  eldest  daughter  to  Brigadier  James  Bruce  of  Kennet  ; 
and  Walter  Dundas  his  second  son,  who  is  a  merchant  in  Glasgow. 

The  said  James  Dundas,  third  son  to  the  said  second  George,  married  Elizabeth 
Haliburton,  daughter  to  John  Haliburton  of  Garvock,  with  whom  he  had  four 
sons,  George,  John,  James,  and  Walter ;  John,  the  only  surviving  spn,  is  at  pre- 
sent advocate  for  the  church  of  Scotland,  and  principal  clerk  to  her  General  As- 
semblies. 

There  was  a  very  accurate  and  distinct  account  and  tree  of  this  family  of  Dun- 
das handed  down  to  the  death  of  this  second  George,  showing  not  only  its  de- 
scent, the  succession  of  the  heads  of  the  family  as  above,  and  of  their  issue  from 
one  generation  to  another,  and  of  their  alliances  by  marriages,  both  with  their 
ladies  and  of  their  children,  all  which  were  very  honourable  ;  but  also  noticing  the 
several  remarkable  events  that  had  happened  to  the  family ;  which  account,  by 
occasion  of  the  troubles  the  family  fell  into,  after  that  time,  is  now  amissing ;  bur 
it  is  expected  the  same  may  yet  be  recovered. 


Of  the  families  of  DUNDAS  of  Newliston,  Philpston,  and  Breastmiil. 


DUNCAN  DUNDAS,  third  son  of  James  Dundas  of  that  Ilk,  by  his  first  mar- 
riage, and  younger  brother  of  Sir  Archibald  Dundas  of  that  Ilk,  got  the  lands  of 
Craigton,  and  thereafter  the  lands  of  Newliston,  in  West  Lothian,  from  the  family 
of  Dundas,  to  whom  succeeded  his  son  William  Dundas ;  and  to  the  said  Wil- 
liam succeeded  James-  his  son,  and  to  the  said  James  succeeded  George  his  son,  and 
to  the  said  George  succeeded  his  son  John  Dundas  of  Newliston. 


14  APPENDIX. 

This  John  married  Margaret  Crichton,  daughter  to  Crichton  of  Lugton,  with 
whom  he  had  Sir  James  his  eldest  son,  who  succeeded  him  in  his  estate  of  New- 
liston  ;  David  his  second  son,  to  whom  he  gave  the  greatest  part  of  the  lands  of 
Phiipston  ;  Mr  George  his  third  son,  who  got  from  him  the  lands  of  Morton,  and 
a  part  of  tlie  lands  of  Phiipston ;  and  Patrick,  the  fourth  and  youngest  son,  who 
got  the  lands  of  Breastmill. 

The  eldest  son  Sir  James,  above  mentioned,  succeeded  his  father  in  the  estate 
of  Newliston.  He  married  Elizabeth  Dundas,  daughter  to  Sir  Walter  Dundas  of 
that  Ilk,  and  with  her  had  three  sons ;  Sir  John,  who  succeeded  him  in  the  lands  • 
of  Newhston ;  George,  the  second,  who  purchased  the  lands  of  Dubend,  and  mai-- 
ried  Oliphant,  daughter  to  Oliphant  of  Kirkhill,  and   had  with  her  a  son, 

John,  who  died  without  lawful  issue ;  and  James,  the  third,  who  was  a  merchant  in 
Edinburgh,  and  died  unmarried. 

Sir  John  of  Newliston  married  Agnes  Gray,  daughter  to  the  Lord  Gray,  by 
whom  he  had  a  daughter,  named  Elizabeth  Dundas,  who  succeeded  him  in  his 
estate  of  Newliston,  and  was  married  to  John  Earl  of  Stair.  Their  son  and 
successor  is  the  present  John  Earl  of  Stair,  Viscount  of  Dalrymple,  and  Lord 
Newliston,  whose  arms  I  have  given  with  those  of  Dundas  of  Newhston,  in  my 
Essay  on  the  Ancient  and  Modern  Use  of  Armories,  and  in  the  First  Part  of  this 
System  of  Heraldry. 

David  Dundas,  elder  of  Phiipston,  second  son  of  John  Dundas  of  Newliston, 
iiad  only  one  son,  Lieutenant-Colonel  John  Dundas,  by  Elizabeth  Hamilton, 
daughter  to  Hamilton  of  Binning,  who  dying  before  his  father  without  lawful  issue, 
the  said  David's  share  of  the  lands  of  Phiipston  devolved  to  James  Dundas  of 
Morton,  his  nephew,  by  the  said  Mr  George  his  brother.  The  foresaid  Mr  George, 
the  third  son  of  John  of  Newliston,  married  Susanna  Brown,  daughter  to  Brown 
of  Coalston,  with  whom  he  had  four  sons;  James,  who  succeeded  him  in  his  estate 
of  Phiipston  and  Morton,  Alexander,  William,  and  Patrick ;  which  last  three  all 
died  without  lawful  issue. 

The  said  Jabies,  the  eldest,  married  Ehzabeth  Hamilton,  daughter  to  Hamilton 
of  Westport,  and  with  her  he  had  six  sons,  James,  George,  David,  William,  Thomas, 
and  Walter;  James  died  unmarried,  and  his  brother  David  succeeded  to  him,  who 
having  only  daughters  by  Katharine  Swinton,  daughter  to  George  Swinton  of 
Chesters,  third  son  to  Swinton  of  that  Ilk,  was  succeeded  by  Euphame  Dundas, 
his  eldest  daughter,  married  to  the  above-mentioned  Mr  John  Dundas,  Advocate, 
grandchild  to  the  aforesaid  second  George  Dundas  of  that  Ilk,  by  the  said  James 
Dundas  his  third  son,  who  have  had  several  children,  of  which  two  sons  and  three 
daughters  are  still  living.  George  and  Walter  died  without  issue,  and  William 
was  Brigadier  in  the  Third  Troop  of  Royal  Horse-Guards,  and  died  also  without 
issue. 

Thomas,  the  fifth  son  of  the  said  James  Dundas  of  Phiipston  and  Morton,  has 
now  purchased  the  Mains  of  Drumcross  in  West  Lothian,  and  has  several  sons  by 
his  wife  Jean  Wishart,  daughter  to  Captain  Patrick  Wishart,  son  to  Dr  George 
Wishart,  sometime  Lord  Bishop  of  Edinburgh. 

The  above-mentioned  Patrick  Dundas,  fourth  son  of  the  above  John  Dundas  of 
Newliston,  left  the  estate  of  Breastmill  to  James  Dundas  his  son,  who  married 
Elizabeth  Reid,  daughter  to  George  Reid,  merchant,  and  sometime  one  of  the 
baiiies  of  Edinburgh,  with  whom  he  had  five  sons,  Patrick,  George,  Wilham, 
James,  and  John. 

Patrick,  his  eldest  son  and  heir,  married  Rachel  Baillie,  daughter  to  Baillie  of 
Jerviswood,  and  with  her  had  his  son  James  Dundas,  who  succeeded  his  fa- 
ther in  the  estate  of  Breastmill,  and  has  now  married  Elizabeth  BaiUie,  heiress  of 
Castlecary,  in  the  shire  of  Stirling. 

George,  the  second,  was  a  chirurgeon-apothecary;  he  married  in  England,  and 
died  .there,  having  several  children. 

James,  the  fourth  son,  married  Marion  Monteith,  daughter  to  George  Monte'ith, 
the  representative  of  the  family  of  Kerse,  and  with  her  had  only  one  son  called 
George ;  and  William  and  John  live  still  unmarried. 

I  have  given  the  arms  of  these  families  in  the  First  Part  of  this  System. 
2 


APPENDIX. 


Memorial  yok  WILLIAM  DUNDAS,  Esc)^  heir-male  of  the  family  of  Di'>jdas 
OF  THAT  Ilk. 


THE  author  of  the  memorial  for  the  present  laird  having  omitted  to  take  any 
notice  of  the  issue  of  Ralph  Dundas,  late  of  that  Ilk,  and  wholly  passed  over  in 
silence  Mr  William  Dundas,  his  eldest  son,  the  lineal  heiv-male  and  representative 
of  the  House  of  Dundas,  from  Archibald  Dundas  of  Listen,  and  Agnes  Borthwick, 
who  lived  in  the  reign  of  King  James  II.  In  justice  to  that  gentleman  and  his 
family,  lately  returned  from  abroad,  this  memorial  is  offered,  both  to  instruct  his 
right  preferable  to  that  of  the  present  possessor  of  the  estate  of  Dundas,  and  account 
for  the  manner  wherein  he  was  divested  of  that  estate,  to  which  he  might  have 
otherwise  succeeded. 

George  Dundas  of  that  Ilk,  cotemporary  with  King  Charles  II.  and  eldest  son 
of  Sir  Walter  Dundas  of  that  Ilk,  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  to  Hamilton  of 
Innerwick,  by  whom  he  had  three  sons,  Walter  his  heir,  George,  father  to  George 
Dundas  presently  of  that  Ilk,  and  James,  father  to  John  Dundas  late  of  Philp- 
ston. 

Walter  Dundas,  the  eldest  son,  married  Lady  Christian  Leslie,  daughter  to 
Alexander  first  Earl  of  Leven,  by  whom  he  had  Ralph,  his  eldest  son,  and  Walter: 
Their  father,  Walter,  having  deceased  before  George  the  grandfather,  the  fee  of  the 
estate  came  in  the  person  of  Ralph  the  eldest  son. 

Ralph  Dundas  of  that  Ilk  married  Mrs  Elizabeth  Sharp,  daughter  to  William 
Sharp  of  Houston,  by  whom  he  had  Christian,  Walter,  and  William,  the  only  sur- 
viving child  of  the  marriage:  But  the  above  George  Dundas  of  that  Ilk,  after  the 
death  of  his  eldest  son  Walter,  having  taken  some  exceptions  at  the  conduct  of  his 
grandson  Ralph,  executed  a  deed  of  tailzie  of  his  estate,  affected  with  several  irri- 
tant and  resolutive  clauses,  particularly  prohibiting  the  heir  of  entail  to  burden  the 
estate  with  debts  exceeding  a  certain  sum.  Ralph  Dundas  incautiously  incurred 
that  irritancy;  and  afterwards  dying,  his  uncle  George,  above  noticed,  insisted 
in  a  process  of  declarator  before  the  Lords  of  Session,  against  William,  Ralph's  eldest 
son  and  heir;  and,  having  prevailed  therein,  dispossessed  him.  From  whence  it 
appears,  that  though  the  above  George  Dundas  wrested  the  estate  from  his  nephew, 
by  using  the  severity  of  the  law  against  him,  yet  the  right  of  primogeniture  still 
remains  with  the  said  William  Dundas  and  his  heirs,  wlio  must  be  considered  as 
the  chief  and  only  representatives,  and  lineal  heirs-male  of  the  said  Archibald 
Dundas  of  Dundas,  cotemporary  with  King  James  II.  anno  1450.  whoever  be  in 
possession  of  the  estate. 

The  aforesaid  William  Dundas  married  Jean  Stewart,  daughter  to  Dr  Stewart, 
son  of  Grandtully,  by  whom  he  had  two  sons  alive, 

Thomas,  his  eldest.  Merchant  in  Rotterdam;  and 

William,  the  second.  Doctor  of  Medicine. 


Of  the  families  of  DUNDAS  of  Duddingston  and  Manor. 


WILLIAM  DUNDAS,  second  son  of  William  Dundas  of  that  Ilk,  and  his  lady, 
Margaret  Wauchope,  daughter  to  Wauchope  of  Niddry,  married  Marjory  Lindsay, 
portioner  of  Duddingston,  and  with  her  had  two  sons,  William  and  David.  Wil- 
liam, the  eldest,  was  many  years  in  Sweden,  married  a  Swedish  woman,  and  with 
her  had  only  two  daughters.  The  eldest,  Margaret,  was  married  to  Mr  James 
Donaldson,  a  minister;  and  the  second,  Grissel,  to  Drummond  of  Caiiowrie. 

David,  the  second  son,  purchased  the  lands  of  Priestinch,  and  thereafter  the  rest 
of  the  lands  of  Duddingston.  He  married  Marjory  Hamilton,  daughter  to  Ha- 
milton of  Orbiston,  and  with  her  had   two   sons;  James,  who  succeeded  in  the 

Vol.  11.  4  L 


i6  APPENDIX. 

lands  of  Duddingston ;  and  George,  his  second  son,  who  purchased  the  lands  of 
Manor  in  Perthshire. 

This  James  of  Duddingston  married  Isabel  Maule,  brother-daughter  to  Maule  of 
Panmure,  and  with  her  had  two  sons,  George,  who  succeeded,  and  William,  who 
died  without  issue. 

George  of  Duddingston  married  Katharine  Monypenny,  daughter  to  Monypenny 
of  Pitmillie,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son  John,  who  married  Anne  Carmichael, 
only  daughter  to  Sir  David  Carmichael  of  Balmedy,  atid  Anne  Carmichael,  daugh- 
ter to  James  Lord  Carmichael,  and  with  her  had  many  sons;  the  eldest,  George, 
who  married  Magdalen  Lindsay,  daughter  to  Mr  Patrick  Lindsay,  alias  Crawford 
of  Kilbirnie,  second  son  to  the  Earl  of  Crawford,  with  whom  he  has  several  chil- 
dren. David,  the  second  son  of  the  said  John,  was  an  advocate  and  clerk  to  the 
General  Assembly :  He,  and  all  the  rest  of  the  sons,  died  unmarried,  except  John, 
the  fifth  son,  who  is  Presenter  of  the  Signatures  in  Exchequer,  and  has  married 
Christian  Mure,  daughter  to  Adam  Mure  of  Blackball,  apothecary,  burgess  of 
Edinburgh. 

George  Dundas  of  Manor,  second  son  to  David  Dundas  of  Duddingston,  mar- 
ried Margaret  Livingston,  daughter  to  Livingston  of  Westquarter,  and  had  with 
her  one  son,  John  Dundas,  who  succeeded  his  father  in  his  estate  of  Manor;  he 
married  Elizabeth  Hamilton,  daughter  to  Hamilton  of  Kilbrackmont,  and  with  her 
had  two  sons,  Ralph,  who  succeeded  his  father  in-  the  lands  of  Manor,  and  mar- 
ried Helen  Burnet,  daughter  to  Sir  Thomas  Burnet,  sometime  physician  to  King 
William,  by  whom  he  has  many  children.  John,  the  second  son  of  the  above- 
mentioned  John  Dundas  of  Manor,  is  a  chirurgeon-apothecary,  has  purchased  the 
lands  of  Wester-Bogie  in  the  shire  of  Fife,  and  has  married  Elizabeth. Fergusson, 
daughter  to  James  Fergusson,  merchant  and  bailie  of  Inverkeithing.  The  arms  of 
the  family  of  Duddingston  are  given  in  the  First  Part  of  this  System. 


Of  the  families  of  DUNDAS  of  Arniston  and  Harvieston. 


SIR  JAMES  DUNDAS,  the  first  of  Arniston,  was  second  son  to  the  first  George 
Dundas  of  that  ilk,  and  his  second  lady,  Katharine  Oliphant,  daughter  to  the  Lord 
Oliphant;  He  married  first  Dame  Katharine  Douglas,  daughter  to  the  Lord  Tor- 
thorvvald,  by  whom  he  had  several  sons,  who  all  died  without  issue,  and  seven 
daughters,  all  honouratly  married  :  Afterwards  he  married  Dame  Mary  Home, 
daughter  to  Home  of  Wedderburn,  by  whom  he  had  two  sons.  Sir  James,  his  eldest, 
who  succeeded  him  in  his  estate  of  Arniston,  and  Robert  Dundas  of  Harvieston 
his  second. 

This  Sir  James  was  one  of  the  Senatoi-s  of  the  College  of  Justice;  he  first  mar- 
ried Dame  Marion  Boyd,  daughter  to  the  Lord  Boyd,  by  whom  he  had  Robert  his 
successor;  and  thereafter  he  married  Dame  Janet  Hepburn,  daughter  to  Hepburn 
of  Humbie,  by  whom  he  had  James  Dundas,  merchant.  Doctor  Alexander  Dundas, 
his  Majesty's  Physician,  and  Captain  Charles  Dundas. 

This  Robert  Dundas  of  Arniston  is  also  one  of  the  Senators  of  the  Colleye  of 
Justice;  he  married  Margaret  Sinclair,  daughter  to  Sir  Robert  Sinclair  of  Steven- 
ston,  with  whom  he  had  several  children,  Mr  James  and  Mr  Robert  Dundasses, 
advocates,  Alexander,  John,  and  Charles  Dundasses,  merchants,  and  Thomas 
Dundas. 

James,  his  eldest  son,  married  Mary  Hope,  daughter  to  Sir  Alexander  Hope  of 
Kerse,  and  died,  leaving  only  one  daughter,  Margaret. 

Mr  Robert  Dundas,  now  his  eldest  son,  is  at  present  his  Majesty's  Advocate  for 
Scotland,  and  has  several  children  by  his  kdy,  Ehzabeth  Watson,  daughter  to 
Watson  of  Muirhouse. 

Robert  Dundas  of  Harvieston,  above  mentioned,  second  son  of  the  first  Sir-  James 

Dundas   of  Arniston,    married  first Borthwick,  daughter  to  the   Lord 

Borthwick,  by  whom  he  had  John,  his  eldest  son,  who  died  without  issue ;  after- 
wards he  married  Katharine  Hamilton,  daughter  to  Hamilton  of  Preston,  with 
2. 


APPENDIX.  17 

whom  he  had  three  sons,  Alexander,  and  Walter,  who  died  without  issue,  and 
George,  the  youngest,  who  is  a  chirurgeon-apothecary  in  Edinburgh,  and  has  se- 
veral children  by  Anne  Somerville,  daughter  to  Mr  John  Somerville,  sometime 
minister  at  Cramond. 

The  above-mentioned  James  Dundas,  merchant,  eldest  son  of  the  second  mar- 
riage to  the  said  Sir  James  Dundas  of  Arniston,  one  of  the  Scmitois  of  the  College 
of  Justice,  married  Janet  Riddel,  daughter  to  Mr  Archibald  Riddel,  lately  one  of 
the  ministers  of  Edmburgh,  and  brother-german  to  Sir  John  Riddel  of  that  Ilk, 
and  has  with  her  one  son,  Robert  Dundas,  a  merchant. 

Doctor  Alexander  Dundas,  his  Majesty's  Physician,  the  second  son,  lives  still 
unmarried ;  Captain  Charles,  the  third  son  of  the  said  iNIargaret,  married  Helen 
Dundas,  daughter  to  George  Dundas,  merchant  in  Leith,  who  is  after-mentioned, 
and  has  with  her  two  sons.  Captain  George  Dundas,  the  eldest,  who  is  an  officer  in 
the  royal  navy,  and  Dr  James  Dundas,  the  second,  who  is  a  physician. 


Of  the  DUNDASSES  of  Kincavil,  Airth,  and  1VL\gdalens. 


THE  above-mentioned  William  Dundas,  second  son  to  the  foresaid  Sir  Walter 
Dundas  of  that  Ilk,  married  Katharine  Murray,  daughter  to  Murray  of  Pennyland, 
and  had  with  with  her  two  sons,  Mr  William  Dundas,  Advocate,  who  purchased 
the  lands  of  Kincavil  in  West  Lothian,  and  George  Dundas,  merchant  in  Leith. 
The  said  Mr  William  Dundas  of  Kincavil  married  Margaret  Edmonstone,  daughter 
toEdmonstone  of  Ednam,  and  had  with  her  only  two  daughters,  Anne,  the  eldest, 
who  was  married  to  Lieutenant-Colonel  John  Erskine  of  Carnock,  uncle  to  the 
Earl  of  Buchan,  who  hath  several  chUdren;  and  Christian,  the  second,  who  was 
married  to  James  Earl  of  Bute,  who  had  with  her  one  son,  Mr  John  Stewart. 

The  said  George  Dundas,  merchant,  second  son  of  the  first  mentioned  William 
Dundas,  married  Helen  Cooper,  daughter  to  Cooper  of  Gogar,  and  had  by  her 
several  sons ;  John,  the  eldest,  married  Alison  Burnet,  daughter  to  Burnet, 

merchant  in  Leith,  and  had  by  her  several  children. 

William,  the  second  son  of  the  said  George 'Dundas,  merchant,  married  Eliza- 
beth Elphinston,  heiress  of  Airth,  in  the  shire  of  Stirling,  and  has  with  her  several 
children  ;  he  has  now  purchased  the  lands  of  Blair  in  Perthshire,  near  Culross, 
whicli  he  calls  New-Airth. 

James,  the  third  son  of  the  said  George,  died  unmarried. 

The  said  Mr  Walter  Dpndas,  third  son  of  the  foresaid  Sir  Walter  Dundas  of 
that  Ilk,  purchased  the  lands  of  Magdalens  in  West  Lothian;  he  married  Eliza- 
beth Bruce,  daughter  to  Bruce  of  Earlshall,  and  by  her  had  two  sons  and  several 
daughters.  He  afterwards  went  with  his  whole  family  to  Ireland,  and  they  still, 
continue  there. 


FOULIS    OF    COLLINGTON. 


THESE  of  the  name  of  Foulis,  for  their  arms  bear  argent,  three  bay  leaves,  slip- 
ped iif/?,  2  and  I.  The  name  is  from  the  French  woxA  fdiiilles,  wlaich  signifies 
leaves ;  whence  these  of  the  name  are  of  a  French  extract,  from  one  Foulis,  who 
came  to  Scotland  in  King  Malcolm  Canmore's  time  ;  as  Lesly,  in  his  History, 
lib.  6.  pag.  210.  edit.  Rossie,  4to,  says,  Reginaldus  de  Foulis  is  witness  in  charters 
in  the  reign  of  Alexander  the  II.  The  lands  of  Foulis  in  Angus  belonged  of  old 
to  those  of  this  name  ;  of  whom  was  descended  Willi.\m  Foulis,  who  was  Secre- 
tary to  King  James  the  I.  anno  1424,  and  was  made  Keeper  of  the  Privy-Seal,  anno 
1427  ;  as  by  the  registers  of  the  kingdom.     He  had  a  son, 


lis  APPENDIX. 

William  Foulis,  who  married  Elizabeth  Ogilvie,  daughter  to  Sir  Walter  Ogil- 
vie,  and  with  her  had  two  sons,  William  and  James.  The  last  named  married 
Margaret  Henderson,  daughter  to  Sir  Thomas  Henderson  of  Fordel,  and  liad  a 
son  named  James,  who  succeeded  to  his  uncle  William,  who  died  without  chil- 
dren. He  purchased  the  lands  of  Collington,a««o  1519.  There  is  a  commission  to 
this  James,  and  Adam  Otterburn  of  Auldhame,  conjunctly  and  severally,  and  the 
longest  liver  of  them  two,  to  be  Advocates  to  the  King,  dated  anno  1526;  and  in 
anno  1531,  he  was  made  Clerk  Register  during  life:  which  commission  is  renew- 
ed by  Qiieen  Mary,  eumo  1542.  He  married  Katharine  Brown,  daughter  to  Brown 
of  Hartree,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son 

Heniiy  Foulis,  who  married  Mary  Haldane,  daughter  to  Gleneagles.  There  is  a 
letter  from  Prince  Henry  and  Queen  Mary,  presenting  him  to  be  one  of  the  Se- 
nators of  the  Session,  as  soon  as  a  place  in  the  temporal  state  should  happen  to 
vaick,  dated  anno  regnii.  and  24.;  which  letter  is  in  the  Advocates'  Library.  He 
was  succeeded  by  his  son 

James  Foulis,  who  married  Anna  Heriot,  heiress  of  Lumphoy  ;  with  her  he  had 
issue  seven  sons,  James,  who  succeeded;  George,  the  first  laird  of  Ravelston  ;  and 
David  who  went  to  England  with  King  James  VI.  and  was  made  knight  baronet 
6th  February  16 19,  and  got,  by  favour  of  the  king,  the  lands  of  Inglesby  in  the 
county  of  York,  which  are  possessed  by  his  descendants  to  this  day.  The  fifth 
son,  John  Foulis,  apothecary,  whose  grandson,  John  Foulis,  in  the  Sasine  Chamber, 
is  servant  to  Mr  William  Foulis,  clerk,  after-mentioned;  and  the  seventh  son  Foulis 
of  Ratho. 

Sir  James,  the  eldest  son,  succeeded  his  father,  who  married  Mary  Lauder,  a 
daughter  of  Lauder  of  Hatton,  and  relict  of  the  Laird  of  Cunninghamhead;  and 
was  succeeded  by  his  son 

Sir  Alexander  Foulis,  made  Knight  Baronet  7th  June  1634;  married  Eliza- 
beth Hepburn,  relict  of  the  sheriff  of  Bute.  Her  father  was  son  to  Riccarton,  who 
was  son  to  the  Earl  of  Bothwell ;  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son 

Sir  James  Foulis,  w-ho  was  eminently  loyal  for  his  Sovereign  King  Charles  II. 
married  Barbara  Ainslie,  daughter  to  Andrew  Ainslie,  one  of  the  magistrates  of 
lidinburgh.  He  was  made  a  Senator  of  the  College  of  Justice,  anno  i66r,  and 
Justice  Clerk,  anna  1684.  In  which  ofllces  he  continued  till  his  death,  the  ipth  of 
January  1688,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son 

Sir  James  Foulis,  who  married  Margaret  Boyd,  daughter  to  John  Boyd,  Dean  of 
Guild  of  Edinburgh.  He  was  one  of  the  Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice  in  the 
year  1674,  and  continued  in  that  office  till  1688  ;  died  1711,  and  is  succeeded  by 
his  son  Sir  James. 

The  eldest  cadet  of  the  family  of  Collington  was  the  above-mentioned  George 
Foulis,  second  son  of  James  Foulis  of  Collington,  and  his  lady  Anne  Heriot.  He 
was  Master  of  his  Majesty's  Mint,  and  purchased  the  lands  of  Ravelston,  and  mar- 
ried Janet  Bannatvne,  daughter  to  George  Bannatyne  of  Newtyle,  ist  June  1603. 
With  her  he  had  several  children  ;  George  his  eldest  son,  and  Mr  Alexander  a 
younger  one,  who  purchased  the  lands  of  Ratho,  now  possessed  by  his  grandson 
Alexander  Foulis  of  Ratho,  who  carries  argent,  on  a  cheveron  between  three  lau- 
rel leaves,  vert,  as  many  besants  argent ;  crest,  a  dove  holding  an  olive  branch  in 
her  beak,  proper  :  motto.  Pax. 

George,  the  eldest  son,  succeeded  his  father  in  the  lands  of  Ravelston;  he  mar- 
ried Jean  Sinclair,  daughter  to  Sir  John  Sinclair  of  Stevenson;  and  was  succeeded 
by  his  son 

Sir  John  Foulis,  dignified  in  anno  1661  Baronet.  He  married  Margaret  Prim- 
rose, daughter  to  Sir  Archibald  Primrose  of  Chester,  Clerk  Register,  and  his  lady 
Elizabeth  Keith,  daughter  to  James  Keith  of  Benholm,  second  son  to  George 
Earl  Marischal.  Sir  Archibald  Primrose  having  purchased  the  estate  of  Dunipace, 
tailzied  the  same  to  Sir  John's  eldest  son,  on  condition  that  he  should  bear  the 
name  and  arms  of  Primrose.  Sir  John' Foulis,  that  he  might  have  one  of  his  sons 
to  represent  himself,  bearing  his  name  and  arms,  gave  to  his  second  son,  William 
Foulis,,  the  lands  of  Woodhall.  Sir  John  Foulis  was  Clerk  to  the  General  Regis- 
ter of  Seasins,  E.enunciations,  &c.  and  to  other  particular  registers,  from  the  year 
1661,  to  the  year  1701,  that  he  dimitted  those  offices  in  favour  of  his  second  son. 


APPENDIX. 


^9 


William  Fmiiis,  now  of  Woodhall.  His  father's  arms  were  argent,  on  a  fessc,  be- 
tween three  bay  leaves  vert,  a  primrose  or ;  crest,  a  dove  volant,  holding  a  leaf  in 
her  beak,  proper  :  motto,   Tbtire  l^  jure. 

Sir  John  Foui.is  of  Ravelston  ;  his  eldest  son  George  took  upon  him  the  name 
and  arms  of  Primrose,  by  the  destination  of  his  grandfather.  Sir  Archibald  Prim- 
rose. His  son  Sir  Archibald  Primrose  possesseth  the  lands  of  Dunipace  and  Ravel- 
ston, grandson  of  Sir  John  Foulis. 

William  Fuulis  of  Woodhall,  second  son  of  Sir  John,  carries  the  arms  of  Fouhs, 
argent,  three  bay  leaves  slipped  vert,  within  a  bordure  ermine  ;  crest,  a  flower-pot 
with  a  branch  of  laurel  springing  out  of  it  :  motto,  Non  deficit. 


CHALMERS  of  Gaitgirth. 


CHALMERS  or  Chambers  of  Gaitgirth,  sometimes  designed  Chalmers  of  that 
Ilk,  as  in  the  Fust  Volume  of  this  Treatise,  is  one  of  the  ancientest  famihes  in 
the  shire  of  Ayr,  and  chief  of  the  name ;  of  old,  wrote  in  Latin,  De  Camera,  es- 
pecially in  our  ancient  records. 

Sir  George  Mackenzie,  in  his  Manuscript  of  Families,  says.  It  is  more  than 
probable  that  this  family  took  the  surname  de  Camera,  when  surnames  first  be- 
gan in  the  reign  of  Malcolm  Canmore,  from  the  office  Camerariiis  Regis,  i.  e. 
the  King's  Chamberlain  ;  and  says  he  has  seen  a  charter  granted  by  King  William 
to  the  abbacy  of  Paisley ;  amongst  the  witnesses  there  is  one  Herbert  de  Camera, 
which,  no  doubt,  was  then  his  surname,  and  not  his  office ;  for  in  King  William's 
time,  he  wtio  had  the  office  of  chamberlain,  beside  his  siurname,  was  designed 
Camcrarms  Regis;  so  it  is  probable  the  surname  de  Camera  was  occasioned  by  the 
office  being  anciently  in  this  family. 

In  the  records  of  charters  in  the  Parliament  House,  there  are  several  granted  to 
them  of  the  name  of  Camera,  as,  Charta  Willielmi  de  Camera,  in  the  year  1369. 
As  also  to  the  name  of  Chnhner,  as  Charta  'Joannis  Cbalmer,  under  the  Great  Seal, 
erecting  the  lands  of  Gaitgirth  and  Culreath  into  one  barony,  in  the  shire  of  Ayr, 
1468.  These  names  Camera  and  Cbalmer  are  the  same  ;  the  one  in  Latin,  the 
other  in  English. 

I  have  seen  a  birth-brieve  in  the  reign  of  King  James  VI.  with  the  consent  of 
his  privy  council,  past  under  the  Great  Seul  to  Sir  James  Boyd  of  Trochrig,  the 
i6th  of  August  1609,  showing  his  mother,  Margaret  Cbalmer,  daughter  of  Jame< 
Chalmer,  Baron  of  Gaitgirth,  chief  of  his  family,  and  of  the  name,  as  also  his  pro- 
genitors, barons  of  Gaitgirth,  these  500  years  bygone,  which  is  evident  by  authen- 
tic documents  of  the  family  in  Latin,  thus,  "  In  prosapia,  Margareta  Camera  filia 
"  domini  Jacobi  Camerii,  Baronis  de  Gaitgirth,  familias  suae  principis.  Qui  quideni 
"  Camerii,  Baronis  de  Gaitgirth,  ab  annis  jam  amplius  quingentis,  illius  noniini^ 
"  principes  claruerunt,  ut  ex  authenticis  liquet  illius  domus  laonumentis." 

One  of  the  family  surnamed  de  Camera  (as  Sir  George  Mackenzie)  went  to 
France,  and  called  himself  Camerarius,  in  Latin,  and  in  French,  de  la  Chambre, 
and  after  his  return  home,  in  English,  Chalmers.  This  tradition,  savs  he,  seems 
to  be  confirmed  by  the  flower-de-luce  which  the  family  carries  in  their  arms.  It  is 
very  probable  it  was  granted  by  the  King  of  France  when  John  Chalmers  of  Gait- 
girth, in  the  year  1423,  accompanied  Archibald  Earl  of  Douglas  to  France,  who 
was  made  Duke  of  Touraine,  and  Marechal  of  France,  by  King  Charles  Vll. ;  he 
quartered  the  arms  of  that  dukedom,  being  azure,  sane  of  flower-de-luces  or,  witii 
his  own  arms.  And  John  Chalmer  probably  had  one  flower-de-luce  granted  to  him 
for  his  valour,  which  the  family  ever  since  have  continued.  The  name  Ch.\lmers 
is  since  more  frequently  used  than  Camera  in  all  their  charters  that  1  have  seen, 
by  which  I  give  the  genealogical  account  of  the  family.  . 

Sir  John  Chalmers  of  Gaitgirth,  s- n  to  the  above-mentioned  John,  as  by  his 
charter  in  the  year  1468.  He  is  frequently  mentioned  in  the  records  of  Parlia- 
ment, in  the  year  1484,  which  continued  to  the  first  of  October  1487.  Dominus  df 

Vol.  II.  M 


;o  APPENDIX. 

Gah^hth  ;  and  is  ranked  amongst  the   barons    betwixt  Doj/ii/ii/s  de  Ker,  and  Domi- 
nus  de  Balcomy ;  he  was  succeeded  by  his  son 

James,  who  gets  his  sasine  of  the  lands  and  barony  of  Gaitgirth,  Culraith,  and 
Chalmer-house,  (from  the  last  of  these  lands  the  family  has  been  designed  Chal- 
mers of  that  Ilk)  as  heir  to  his  father,  Sir  John  Chalmers,  upon  a  precept  of  the 
Chancery,  dated  the  ist  of  October  1501.  He  married  Annabel,  daughter  to  Cun- 
ningham of  Caprington,  a  second  son  of  the  family  of  Glencairn.  Their  son 
and  successor  was 

Robert  Chalmers,  Baron  of  Gaitgirth,  who  married  a  daughter  of  Campbell 
r.ord  Loudon,  afterwards  Earl ;  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son 

James,  who  gets  a  charter  of  confirmation,  under  the  Great  Seal,  of  the  barony 
of  Gaitgirth,  the  6th  of  January  1541  ;  and  a  charter  of  twenty-pound  lands  of 
'f horny-bank,  alias  Chalmer-house;  as  also  a  charter  of  the  lands  of  New-Park  de 
tileiiken,  in  the  lordship  of  Galloway,  and  stewarty  of  Kircudbright,  the  loth  of 
August  1588  :  his  lady  was  a  daughter  of  Fullarton  of  Corsbie;  and  was  succeed- 
ed by  his  son 

James  Chalmers  of  Gaitgirth,  who  was  also  infeft  in  Corsflet  and  Auldhouse- 
burn,  as  heir  to  his  father,  the  8th  of  May  1608.  He  married  a  daughter  of  Hous- 
ton of  that  Ilk.     He  was  succeeded  by  his  son 

James,  Baron  of  Gaitgirth,  Sheriff-Principal  of  Ayr,  by  commission  under  the 
Great  Seal,  dated  the  8th  of  September  1632.  His  lady  was  Isabel  Blair,  daugh- 
ter to  Blair  of  that  Ilk,  and  with  her  had  his  son  and  successor 

John  Chalmers  of  Gaitgirth,  who  married  Mrs  Mary  Campbell,  eldest  lawful 
daughter  to  Sir  Duncan  Campbell  of  Auchinbreck,  father  and  mother  of  the  pre- 
sent John  Chalmers  of  Gaitgirth,  who  married  Mrs  Margaret  Montgomery,  eldest 
lawful  daughter  to  Colonel  James  Montgomery  of  Coilstield,  second  son  of  Alex- 
ander Earl  of  Eglinton,  whose  eldest  son  and  apparent  heir  is 

Captain  John  Chalmers,  who,  during  the  course  of  the  late  war,  served  in 
Leieutenant-General  George  Hamilton's  regiment  abroad  in  Flanders. 

The  achievement  of  this  family  is  argent,  a  demi-lion  rampant  issuing  out  of  a 
fesse,  and,  in  base,  a  flower-de-luce  sable;  crest,  a  falcon  rising,  with  the  motto, 
Spero.  These  arms  have  been  supported,  of  old,  by  a  sagittary  drawing  a  bow 
on  the  right,  and,  on  the  left,  by  a  syren  or  mermaid,  all  proper ;  as  on  the 
frontispiece  of  their  house,  and  other  utensils  belonging  thereto:  which  supporters 
the  family  has  assumed  when  barons  of  Parliament,  as  above  mentioned. 

There  are  several  families  cadets  of  this,  and  I  shall  here  mention  one  honourable 
one  in  France,  viz.  Chalmers,  baron  of  Tartas,  as  by  his  birth-brieve  under  the 
Great  Seal,  and  the  Lyon  Register,  descended  of  Chalmers  of  Gaitgirth,  or  that 
Ilk,  carries  the  same  with  Gaitgirth,  within  a  bordure  gules,  for  his  difference  ; 
crest,  a  falcon  belled,  proper :  motto,  Non  prreda  sed  victoria.  The  first  of 
this  family  was  one  of  the  seven  brothers,  younger  sons  of  the  family  of  Gait- 
girth, or  of  that  Ilk,  who,  in  the  year  1440,  or  thereabout,  were  forced  to  go 
abroad  for  a  slaughter  committed  by  them.  The  predecessor  of  Tartas  continued 
still  in  Fiance,  as  does  his  issue.  Other  three  of  the  seven  returned  from  abroad, 
and  quietly  took  up  their  residence  in  Stirlingshire,  where  the  eldest  of  the  three 
purchased  a  piece  of  land,  which  he  called  Chalmerston.  The  second  purchased 
the  lands  called  Ashentrees,  in  the  said  shire,  which  they  possessed  for  a  consider- 
able time ;  and  some  of  the  issue  of  that  family  are  there  remaining  at  this  time  : 
and  the  third  brother  had  the  Mill  of  Guidie. 

From  Chalmers  of  Ashentrees  was  descended  James  Chalmers,  Advocate,  who 
had  three  wives,  and  with  each  of  then  had  issue;  with  the  first,  Margaret,  a 
daughter  of  Mr  Alexander  Nicolson,  an  Advocate,  he  had  a  son,  Thomas,  who 
married  Mrs  Mary  Cooper,  daughter  to  Sir  John  Cooper  of  Gogar,  who  entailed 
his  estate  upon  John,  the  eldest  son  of  Mr  Thomas,  and  his  daughter;  which  John 
was  ensign  a  considerable  time  in  the  regiment  of  the  Scots  Guards  :  he  has  two 
brothers  in  the  service  of  the  government ;  those  carry  the  arms  of  Gaitgirth,. 
above  blazoned,  with  a  suitable  difference;  crest,  a  hand  holding  up  a  pair  of  scales, 
with  the  motto,  Firtute  iS  labore,  and,  of  late,  Lanx  mihi  clausr/s.. 
3 


APPENDIX. 


MOWBRAY. 


NOTWITHSTANDING  of  what  I  said  of  the  ancient  Ikniily  of  Mowbray  ii. 
the  Fii-st  Volume  of  this  work,  whom,  for  want  of  vouchers  to  prove  the  contrary, 
I  was  obhged  to  conclude  as  extinguished  in  the  person  of  the  last  Sir  Robert 
Mowbray  of  Barnbougle,  who  died  about  the  year  1675,  having,  through  debts  and 
other  misfortunes,  lost  tlie  remains  of  a  very  fair  and  ancient  inheritance,  and  died 
without  issue  of  his  own  body. 

These  baronies  of  Dalmeny,  Barnbougle,  and  Invcrkeithing,  the  paternal  inheri- 
tance of  that  family,  being  now  in  the  possession  of  Primrose  Earl  of  Rosebery. 

Historians  and  heralds  must  write  according  to  information  and  vouchers:  when 
these  are  silent,  Or  hid  from  us,  we  must  also  be  silent.  Nor  is  the  injury  done  to 
families,  through  silence  or  ignorance,  imputable  to  us,  but  to  the  owners  or  con- 
cealers of  such  documents,  who  neglect  to  furnish  us  with  suitable  materials,  where- 
by  themselves  and  predecessors  might  be  perpetuate  to  posterity. 

As,  for  instance,  this  old  family  of  Mowbray  of  Barnbougle,  &.c.  whom  we 
have  in  this  kingdom,  upon  undoubted  record,  as  valorous  and  honourable  people 
above  5C0  years  ago,  had  been  left  without  a  representative  or  heir-male,  known 
to  this,  and  probably  to  after  generations;  if  I  had  not  been  very  lately  furnished 
■with  three  old  parchments,  very  clean  and  clearly  wrote  in  Latin,  with  whole  and 
entire  seals  of  arms  appended  to  two  of  them,  belonging  to  John  Mowbray  of  Cock- 
airny  in  Fife,  and  brought  to  my  hands  by  his  brother-german,  Robert  Mowbray, 
his  majesty's  master-carpenter  for  North  Britain,  and  late  conveener  of  tlie  trades 
of  Edinburgh.  They  plainly  prove,  that  William  Mowbray  of  Cockairny  was  a 
younger  son  of  the  family  of  Barnbougle,  who  were  also  at  that  time  proprietors 
of  the  lordship  of  Inverkeithing,  and  barony  of  Dalmeny.  The  said  William  was 
born,  or  descended  of  them  about  the  year  1460,  who  is  the  undoubted  heir-male 
and  representer  of  that  family.  I  shall  first  give  you  a  short  transumpt  of  the 
parchments  themselves,  and  next  blazon  the  seals. 

The  first  is  a  charter  granted  (in  the  reign  of  King  James  the  IV.)  by  Sir 
Jown  Mowbray  of  Barnbougle,  Knight,  and  lord  or  proprietor  of  the  lordship  of 
Inverkeithing,  in  favours  of  William  Mowbray,  his  beloved  father's  brother,  of  the 
lands  of  Cockairny,  in  the  shire  of  Fife,  as  a  part  of  the  lordship  of  Inverkeithing, 
to  his  heirs  or  assignees  whatsomever,  holding  feu  blanch,  dated  at  Barnbougle, 
the  24th  of  September  151 1,  before  these  witnesses,  James  Logan,  Sheriff-depute 
of  Edinburgh,  cousin  to  the  said  Sir  John  Mowbray,  James  Mowbray,  Philip  Mow- 
bray, and  John  Mowbray,  also  cousins  to  the  said  Sir  John,  Patrick  Sinclair, 
William  Scougal,  Thomas  Gibson.  Signed  thus,  John  Mowbray,  Knight  of  Barn- 
bougle. 

The  second  is  a  precept  of  sasine,  granted  by  the  said  Sir  John  Mowbray  of 
Barnbougle,  lord  of  tlie  barony  of  Inverkeithing,  following  on  the  said  charter, 
directed  to  his  beloved  cousin,  James  Logan,  Sheriff-depute  of  Edinburgh,  Philip 
Mowbray,  John  Mowbray,  Patrick  Sinclair,  AVilliam  Scougal,  and  William  Brown, 
and  to  any  of  them,  conjunctly  and  severally,  his  bailies,  to  give  infeftment  and  pos- 
session to  his  beloved  uncle,  William  Mowbray,  of  the  lands  of  Cockairny,  with 
pertinents;  in  which  precept  he  narrates  the  above  charter.  The  precept  is  dated 
at  Edinburgh  the  25th  of  September  151 1,  and  signed  thus,  John  Mowbray,  Knight, 
with  my  hand. 

The  third  is  a  sasiiTe  following  the  said  charter  and  precept,  in  favours  of  the 
said  William  Mowbray,^  of  the  lands  of  Cockairny  ;  wherein  the  said  charter  and 
precept  are  faithfully  narrated,  written  and  signed  by  Thomas  Ottir,  presbyter  of 
the  diocese  of  St  Andrews,  and,  by  imperial  authority,  notar-public,  dated  at  the 
principal  messuage  or  manor-house  of  Cockairny,  at  two  afternoon,  or  there- 
abouts, the  9th  day  of  October  1511,  the  14th  indiction,  and  Sth  year  of  the  pope- 
dom of  Julius  II.  before  these  witnesses,  Robert  Logan,  Knight,  son  and  heir  to 
John  Logan  of  Restalrig,  Philip  Moubray,  John  Moubray,  James  Moubray,  George 
Hueion,  (whom,  by  the  by,  I  take  to  be  the  predecessor  of  this  present  Hueson  of 


22  APPENDIX. 

Braehead)  Patrick  Cromnoy,  Alexander  Newton,  John  Brown,  Robert  Brown, 
William  Brown,  John  Finlaw,  and  James  Murdo,  with  many  others.  The  reader, 
I  hope,  will  excuse  that,  for  the  satisfaction  of  all  or  any  concerned  in  these  sur- 
names, I  have  industriously  kept  in  all  the  witnesses'  names,  and  kept  close  to  the 
orthograpliy  of  these  times. 

From  all  which,  it  is  to  a  demonstration  evident,  that  this  William  Mowbray 
of  Cockairny,  and  second  son  of  the  family  of  Barnbougle,  born  about  the  year 
1460,  as  above,  was  the  grandson  of  David  Mowbray  of  Barnbougle,  who  was  one 
of  the  hostages  for  the  ransom  of  King  James  I.  mentioned  in  my  First  Volume  ; 
for  that  king  was  detained  eighteen  years  prisoner  in  England,  and  came  home  in 
the  year  1423. 

It  was  the  daughter  of  this  David  Mowbray  who  was  heiress  of  Barnbougle,  and 
was  married  to  Robert  Drummond,  second  son  to  Sir  John  Drummond  of  Stob- 
hall,  who  changed  his  name,  and  bore  the  arms  of  Mowbray,  and  took  for  title 
their  old  patrimonial  stile  of  Dalmeny  ;  which  is  plain  by  the  legend  about  the 
seal,  appended  by  Sir  John  Mowbray  to  the  above  parchments,  viz.  S.  Johannis 
Mouhra  de  Dumain.  By  the  old  characters  of  this  seal  it  appears  to  be  cut  early 
in  the  year  1400. 

The  arms  upon  the  seal  is  a  lion  rampant,  as  expressed  in  my  First  Volume,  yet 
there  is  a  singular  addition,  viz.  a  crown  above  the  head  of  the  lion,  of  which 
crown  there  is  no  mention  made  in  any  account  of  the  arms  of  the  Mowbrays  up- 
on record  before  the  year  1400 ;  wherefore  it  is  more  than  probable  that  it  was 
conferred  upon  them  as  an  additional  mark  of  honour  at  David  Mowbray's  return 
from  England  with  his  prince,  anno  1423,  in  perpetual  memory  of  his  services 
done  for  the  crown  in  that  expedition. 

This  good  action  done  for  King  James  I.  is  not  the  first  signal  service  performed 
by  them  for  their  country  and  sovereign :  for  I  find  that  Roger  Mowbray  is  among 
these  noble  patriots,  dukes,  earls,  lords,  and  barons,  and  is  the  first  baron  who  signed 
that  incomparable  piece,  asserting  their  religion,  loyalty,  and  liberty,  directed  by 
way  of  letter  to  Pope  John  XXIII.  dated  at  the  Abbey  of  Aberbrothick  the  6th 
April  1320,  and  15th  year  of  King  Robert  the  Bruce's  reign. 

The  race  of  the  family  of  Barnbougle  failed  in  the  year  1675,  as  above  men- 
tioned; but  the  race  of  William  Mowbray  of  Cockairny  are  still  in  being,  and  pre- 
sent possessors  of  that  inheritance ;  from  whom  this  present  John  Mowbray  of  Cock- 
airny is  the  undoubted  heir,  in  a  direct  and  uninterrupted  male  line. 

The  paternal  bearing  of  the  name  of  Mowbray  is  gules,  a  lion  rampant  argent, 
crowned  or,  armed  and  langued  azure,  and  has  been  in  use  to  be  supported  by  a 
man  on  the  right,  and  a  woman  on  the  left,  in  fashionable  habits;  crest,  a  woman's 
head  :  motto,  Audentes  fortuna  juvat. 

Robert  Mowbray  above  mentioned,  brother  to  the  present  John   Mowbray  of 
Cockairny,  carries  the  arms  of  the  family,  with  a  crescent  ^z//(?j'  upon  the  shoulder 
of  the  lion  ;  and,  for  crest,  a  hand  with  a  hand-saw,  proper,  with  the  motto,  La 
bore  et  industria. 


MOODIE  OF  Melsetter. 


CAPTAIN  James  Moodie,  late  Commander  of  his  Majesty's  ship  the  Prince 
George,  a  son  of  Moodie  of  Melsetter,  an  ancient  family  in  Orkney,  upwards 
of  400  years  standing,  who  have  possessed  several  lands  in  Caithness  since  the  year 
1460.  Captain  James,  for  his  merit  and  great  services  done  to  her  late  Majesty 
Queen  Anne,  and,  in  particular,  for  relieving  the  town  and  Castle  of  Denia  in 
Spain,  when  besieged  by  the  French  in  the  years  1707,  and  1708,  was  by  her  ma- 
jesty honoured  with  a  coat  of  augmentation,  which  is  quartered  in  the  first  and 
fourth  place  bef)re  his  paternal  coat,  as  in  Plate  of  Achievements  thus  blazoned, 
viz.  quarterly,  first  and  fourth,  parted  per  fesse  wavey;  'axst  gules,  a  castle  ensigned 


APPENDIX.  23 

with  a  dacal  ciown,  proper;  second  azure,  three  ships  under  sail,  proper;  se- 
cond and  third  quarter,  azure,  ,a  cheveron  ermine  between  three  pheons,  argent, 
and  in  the  middle  chief  point  a  hunting  horn  or,  for  the  name  of  Moodie:  which 
arms  are  adorned  with  manthng  and  hehiiet  suitable  to  his  dignity,  ensigned  with 
a  naval  coronet,  and  thereupon,  for  crest,  is  placed  a  lion  passiint  gard,int  or,  hold- 
ing up  in  his  dexter  paw  a  ^^.g  gules,  and  a  canton  or,  charged  with  a  double  eagle 
displayed  sable ;  with  this  motto,  The  reward  of  valour. 


ROSS  OF  Craigie. 


ROSS  of  Craigie  carries  or,  a  fessc  cheque,  sable  and  argent,  between  three- 
water-budgets  of  the  last,  as  in  Sir  James  Balfour's  MSS.  There  is  no  certain  re- 
cord how,  or  from  whom  this  family  had  its  beginning;  it  is  certain,  it  was  a  great 
and  flourishing  family  in  tiie  reigns  of  Kings  Robert  and  David  Braces;  in  the 
last  of  these  reigns  a  daughter  of  this  family  was  married  to  Sir  John  Drummond 
of  Concraig,  steward  of  Strathern,  predecessor  of  the  Earls  of  Perth;  and  there- 
after Drummond  of  Balloch  married  another  daughter  of  Ross  of  Craigie,  who  was 
mother  of  John  Drummond  first  Laird  of  Milnab,  as  in  the  Genealogical  History 
of  the  Famdy  of  Perth,  written  by  William  Drummond  Viscount  of  Strathallan. 

This  family  continued  eminent  till  about  the  middle  of  King  James  VI. 's  reign, 
when  it  began  to  decline,  and  was  entirely  ruined,  and  their  estate  carried  off  by 
many  creditors  in  the  beginning  of  King  Charles  I.'s  reign. 

John  Ross  Laird  of  Craigie  was  a  principal  favourite  to  King  James  V.  (Knox's 
History)  and  was  taken  prisoner  by  the  English  at  Sohvay  Moss.  He  is  also  men- 
tioned in  Baker's  Chronicle  (by  an  easy  mistake)  John  Ross  Lord  of  Gray,  instead 
of  Laird  of  Craigie.  They  had  a  great  estate  near  the  town  of  Perth,  and  had  in- 
termarriages with  several  honourable  famihes  in  that  country,  as  Drummond  of 
Concraig,  steward  of  Strathern,  Drummond  of  Ballocli,  Murray  of  Balvaird,  now 
Viscount  of  Stormont,  Seaton  of  Lathrisk,  Ogilvie  of  Inchmartin,  and  many 
others. 

From  this  family  is  descended  Patrick  Ross  of  Innernethy,  whose  great-grand- 
father, Patrick  Ross,  Sherift-Clerk  of  Perth,  purchased  these  lands.  He  was  grand- 
child to  Alexander  Ross,  second  son  to  the  Laird  of  Craigie.  This  family  of  In- 
nernethy have  always  carried  the  arms  of  Craigie,  as  appears  from  their  seals,  and 
on  the  funeral  monument  of  the  said  Patrick  Ross,  in  the  Grey  Friars  of  Perth, 
where  the  arms  are  very  well  cut,  but  without  crest  or  motto.  They  are  allied  in 
this  and  the  preceding  generations,  since  their  descent  from  that  House,  with  the 
famihes  of  Norie  of  Norieston  in  Monteith,  Moncrieft'  of  Easter  Moncrietf,  Clark  of 
Pitteuchar,  Lindsay  of  Evelick,  Seaton  of  Lathrisk,  Lindsay  of  Kilspindy,  Pitcairn 
of  Pitlour,  Osburn  of  Peppermill,  Sinclair  of  Balgreigie,  Douglas  of  Strathenrie, 
Balfour  of  Denmill. 

Mr  George  Ross,  Advocate,  a  son  of  Innernethie,  married  the  eldest  daughter 
and  co-heir  of  Mr  John  Sinclair  of  Balgreigie,  a  late  cadet  of  the  Lord  Sinclair, 
for  which  Mr  George  quarters  the  arms  ot,Smclair  of  Balgreigie  witli  his  paternal 
one;  and,  for  crest,  a  CToss  ingrailed  Jitche  sable,  with  the  motto,  Cruce  detector. 
And  for  verity  of  the  above  descent  and  bearing,  the  Lyon  King  at  Arms  has 
given  a  patent  under  his  hand  and  seal  of  office  to  John  Ross,  younger  of  Balgreigie, 
eldest  lav/ful  son  of  Mr  John  Ross  of  Balgreigie,  advocate,  (lawful  son  of  Mr 
Robert  Ross  of  Innernethie,  lawfully  descended  of  the  family  of  Ross  of  Craigie, 
in  the  sheriifdom  of  Perth)  by  Anna  Sinclair,  his  wife,  eldest  lawful  daughter  and 
co-heir  of  Mr  John  Sinclair  of  Balgreigie,  lawfully  descended  of  a  second  son  of 
the  Lord  Sinclair,  to  carry  two  coats,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  or,  a  fesse  cheque, 
sable  and  argent,  betwixt  three  M'ater-budgets,  within  a  bordure  of  the  second,  as 
his  paternal  bearing  of  the  name  of  Ross;  second  and  third,  quarterly,  first  and 
fourth  azure,  a  ship  at  anchor,  within   a  double  tressure.  flowered  and  counter- 

VoL.  U.  4  N 


24  APPENDIX. 

flowered  with  flower-de-luces  or;  second  and  third  azure,  a  ship  under  sail  or; 
over  all  an  escutcheon  ardent,  a  cross  ingrailed  sable,  with  a  crescent  for  difference, 
by  the  name  of  Sinclair,  in  right  of  his  motlier;  crest,  a  cross  ingrailed  sab/e: 
motto,  Cruce  delector. 


SPREUL  OF  COWDEN. 


IN  the  First  Part  of  the  System  of  Heraldry  I  have  given  the  arms  of 
Spreul  of  Cowden,  with  a  short  memorial  of  the  family,  page  437,  and  I  shall 
here  insist  a  little  on  the  descendants  of  that  family,  which  appears  to  have  been 
eminent  of  old  in  the  shire  of  Renfrew:  For,  in  the  reign  of  Alexander  III.' Walter 
Spreul  of  Cowden,  and  Scnescal  of  Lennox,  had  a  grant  of  the  lands  of  Dalquharn 
in  Dumbartonshire  from  the  Earl  of  Lennox. 

The  tamily  continued  from  that  time,  till  about  the  year  1622,  that  William 
Lord  Cochran  of  Cowden,  father  of  the  first  Earl  of  Dundonald,  purchased  the 
lands  of  Cowden  from  John  Spreul,  proprietor  thereof. 

Of  this  family  there  were  several  branches,  as  the  Spreuls  of  Ladymuir,  Castle- 
hill  and  Blachairne.  Mr  John  Spreul,  a  younger  son  of  the  family  of  Cowden,  in 
the  reign  of  King  James  IV.  being  bred  to  learning,  in  view  of  the  service  of  the 
churcli,  took  holy  orders,  and  was  first  made  Vicar  of  Dundonald,  1507,  and  at  the 
same  time  was  one  of  the  Professors  of  Philosophy  in  the  University  of  Glasgow, 
and  thereafter  Rector  of  the  said  university,  as  in  the  Register  of  the  College  of 
Glasgow:  He  was  thereafter  advanced,  by  Bishop  Dunbar  of  Glasgow,  to  be  one  of 
the  prebends  of  his  metropolitan  church,  to  which  the  rectory  of  Ancrum  was  aii- 
nexed. 

By  these  offices  Mr  John  Spreul  made  several  acquisitions  of  lands;  first,  he  ac- 
quired from  Gabriel  Semple,  brother  to  the  Lord  Semple,  the  lands  of  Ladymuir, 
Gastlehill  and  King's-Meadows,  and  that  with  consent  of  Janet  Spreul,  his  spouse, 
who  was  Mr  Spreul's  sister:  Likewise  he  purchased  the  lands  of  Blachairn,  within 
the  lordship  of  Provan,  and  a  fair  lodging  within  the  city  of  Glasgow;  of  all 
which  he  put  his  brother  Robert,  burgess  of  Glasgow,  and  John  Spreul,  his  brother's 
son,  in  the  fee,  by  his  disposition,  dated  1541,  and  by  a  charter  of  confirmation, 
under  the  Great  Seal,  1542,  in  the  minority  of  Queen  Mary.  Of  which  lands 
{ohn,  the  nephew,  came  to  the  possession,  upon  his  uncle's  death,  which  happened 
in  the  year  1555.  Upon  the  Reformation  he  was  made  rector  of  Cambuslang, 
and  was  so  designed  in  his  infeftment  of  the  foresaid  lands,  in  the  year  1588.  He 
was  succeeded  by  his  heir  and  son  John  Spreul,  and  he  by  his  son  John,  who  was 
Provost  of  Renfrew,  about  the  beginning  of  Charles  I.'s  reign  ;  and  he  again 
by  his  son  Mr  John  Spreul,  who,  being  bred  to  the  law,  was  first  made  town-clerk 
of  Glasgow,  and  thereafter  one  of  the  principal  clerks  of  Session.  He  was  succeed- 
ed by  his  son  John  Spreul  of  Blachairn,  who  married  Agnes  Spreul,  daughter  to 
Andrew  Spreul  of  Milton.  There  son  is  Andrew  Spreul  of  Blachairn,  writer  in 
Edinburgh,  who  carries  the  principal  arms  of  Cowden,  as  representer  thereof,  and, 
out  of  gratitude  to  the  memory  of  the  above-mentioned  Mr  John  Spreul,  the 
canon,  he  adds,  by  way  of  crest,  to  his  arms,  a  book  expanded;  with  the  motto, 
Manet  in  eternum. 


FARQUHARSON  of  Invercauld. 


FAPvCiUHARSON,  a  considerable  clan  and  family  in  the  Braes  of  Marr,  and 
adjacent  countrieb,  m  idsh  called  tiuniaula,  deriving  their  descent  from  Shav/, 


APPENDIX'.  25 

son  to  Macduff  Thane  of  Fife,  which  makes  them  related  to  M'Intosh,  and  lias  been 
the  first  arise  of  their  being  reckoned  one  of  the  clans  of  Chatton. 

Farqi'harson'  of  Invercauld  is  the  chieftain  of  the  name,  wliose  coat  of  arms  I 
have  given  in  my  First  Volume,  as  recorded  in  the  Lyon  Register.  The  imme- 
diate sons  of  the  family  (th;it  ac(]uired  lands  and  possessions)  in  order  as  they 
descended,  are,  Monaltrie,  Brochdergo,  Achriachan,  and  Revernis.  The  sons  of 
Monaltrie,  in  their  order,  are,  Finxean,  Alenquhoich,  Inverey,  and  W'hitehouse. 
The  sons  of  Brochdergo  are,  Richaillie,  Shanelie,  and  Alrick.  The  sons  of  Achri- 
achan are  Camdel  and  Altinlairge.  The  sons  of  Revernis  are  Kirkton  of  Aboyne, 
Weston  and  Coults.  The  sons  of  Finv.ean  are  Kirkton  of  Birss  and  Balfour.  The 
sons  of  Alenquhoich  are  Tom  and  Micras.  The  sons  of  Inverey  are  Achindryne 
and  Balmurrel;  and  of  Achindryne  is  TuUochcoy. 


WHITEFORD  of  Blairquh.vn. 


IN  the  First  Volume,  page  368,  I  gave  the  arms  and  alliances  of  the  House  of 
Whu-eford  of  Blairquhan,  which,  since,  I  find  to  have  also  matched  with  Cath- 
cart  of  Carleton;  and  likewise,  that  Sir  Adam  Whiteford  of  Blairquhan  disponed 
to  his  brother  Bryce  Whiteford  the  lands  of  Dundaff  and  Cloncaird. 


GRAHAM  OF  Balgowan. 


GRAHAM  of  Balgowan,  in  the  shire  of  Perth,  descended  of  the  family  of  Mon- 
trose, being  a  fourth  son  of  William  Lord  Graham,  and  his  second  lady,  Mary 
Stewart,  daughter  of  King  Robert  III.  hath  been  in  use  to  carry,  for  arms,  or,  on  a 
chief  indented  sable,  three  escalops  of  the  first,  and  in  the  centre  a  martlet  of  the 
second,  within  the  double  tressure  of  Scotland,  as  a  badge  of  their  maternal  descent 
from  the  royal  family,  and  so  carried  by  the  branches  descended  from  the  above- 
mentioned  lady,  as  I  observed  before;  for  crest,  a  dove;  with  the  motto,  Candide 
y  secure. 

John  Graham  of  Balgowan,  upon  account  of  his  loyalty  and  assistance  given  to 
King  James  VI.  ag-ainst  the  conspiracy  of  William  Earl  of  Gowry,  got  from  that 
ki'ig  several  lands  belonging  to  that  earl,  viz.  Nether-Pitcairnes,  Craigengall,  half 
lands  of  Monedy,  half  lands  of  Legelurie,  and  half  of  Codrachie-Mill,  with  the 
patronage  of  the  kirk  of  Monedy,  as  the  charter  bears,  the  24th  day  of  August 
1584,  which  I  have  seen. 


KINLOCH  OF  THAT  Ilk. 


KINLOCH  of  that  Ilk,  in  the  shire  of  Fife,  seems  to  be  very  ancient,  and  the 
name  amongst  the  earliest  surnames  in  the  kingdom.  Their  arms  are  azure,  a 
boar's  head  couped,  betwixt  three  mascles  or,  as  in  Sir  David  Lindsay  of  the  Mount, 
his  Illuminated  Manuscript,  and  in  Esplin's  Illuminated  Manuscript.  Mr  Pont, 
in  his  Collections,  gives  the  same  arms,  with  others,  viz.  azure,  a  bishop's  pall  or, 
between  three  laurel  leaves  argent.    It  seems  the  family  hath  sometimes  made  use 


26  APPENDIX. 

of  tlie  last  arms,  upon  the  'account  that  one  Kellach,  or  Killoch,  was  the  se- 
cond Archbishop  of  St  Andrews,  as  Mr  Martin  in  his  MS.  ReUquia  Sancta  Andrea. 
This  bishop  built  a  chapel  to  St  Anna,  near  St  Andrews,  called  after  him  Kinkel, 
as  Sir  Robert  Sibbald  says  in  his  History  of  Fife,  page  134.  There  was  after- 
wards another  bisliop  of  St  Andrews  of  the  name  of  Kinloch,  in  the  reign  of  Gre- 
gory the  Great.  They  derive  the  name  of  Kinloch  from  their  lands  situate  at 
the  head  of  a  loch :  And  in  the  old  Scottish  language  kian,  or  kin,  signifies  the  head  : 
p'rom  hence  the  surname  Kinloch  designed  of  the  same. 

As  for  ancient  charters  belonging  to  this  family,  they  are  yet  extant  in  the 
hands  of  Hamilton  of  Wishaw,  a  learned  antiquary,  he  being  in  possession  of  the 
barony  of  Weatherby,  joining  to  Kinloch,  and  a  part  of  that  old  estate,  which  are 
five  charters,  two  of  which  granted  by  Roger  ^dncy  Comes  IVintonia:  y  Constabu- 
larius  Scotia,  to  John  de  Kindcloch,  of  the  lands  of  Birking,  without  a  date:  Also 
another  charter  by  the  same  Roger  Quincy  to  the  said  John  de  Kindeloch  and 
his.  heirs,  of  the  lands  and  mill  of  Peclouhyn,  which  Myles,  the  son  of  William, 
gave  Uthred,  his  grandfather;  which  charter  has  also  no  date;  but  Roger  Quincy's 
seal  is  appended,  with  his  arms,  bemg  seven  mascles  3,  3  and  i;  which  mascles 
the  name  of  Kinloch  now  carrying,  took  their  3  from  Roger  Quincy  as  their 
patron  or  superior  of  some  of  those  lands  so  disponed  by  him  to  them,  and  laid 
aside  the  old  arms,  the  bishop's  pall,  above  mentioned ;  but  bears  a  boar's  head 
erased,  betwixt  two  mascles,  as  it  is  to  be  seen  carved  upon  the  seat  in  the  church 
of  Creigh,  belonging  to  the  predecessors  of  David  Kinloch  of  Conland ;  and  on 
the  gate-head  of  their  house  in  Lithrie,  anno  1591,  done  by  John  Kinloch,  son  and 
heir  to  George  the  immediate  son  of  Kinloch. 

The  third  charter,  in  the  hands  of  the  Laird  of  Wishaw,  is  that  of  William 
M'Brab  to  John  de  Kindeloch,  of  the  lands  of  Collessin,  and  lands  of  Peclouhyn, 
having  no  date,  and  blench. 

Fourth  charter,  IVulter  Oliphard,  son  to  Walter  Oliphard,  to  Allan  son  of  Allan, 
of  the  lands  of  Cullison,  and  lands  of  Abarnethen,  having  no  date.  This  charter 
is  confirmed  by  King  William  in  the  year  1165. 

The  fifth  charter  is  granted  by  John  Ogilvie,  with  consent  of  William  Lamber- 
ton.  Bishop  of  St  Andrews,  to  William  de  Kindeloch,  of  the  lands  of  Parbroth  and 
Kinsleif;  which  lands  march  with  Lithrie. 

So  much  for  the  antiquity  of  the  family,  which  continued  for  a  long  time  very 
considerable,  and  had  a  great  part  of  the  lands  of  Lithrie  and  Brunton  near  join- 
ing with  Kinloch  and  the  barony  of  Cruvie,  about  three  miles  distance  from 
Lithrie. 

Sir  Alexander  Kinloch  of  that  Ilk  had  two  brothers;  Andrew  and  George 
Kinlochs  got  from  their  father  different  portions  of  the  lands  of  Lithrie  and  Brun- 
ton: Sir  Alexander  sold  the  town  and  lands  of  Kinloch  to  Balfour  of  Balgarvie, 
predecessor  to  the  Lord  Burleigh;  but  retained  the  barony  of  Weatherby,  and 
built  a  strong  house  on  Cruvie,  being  at  feud  with  his  neighbours.  The  greatest 
part  of  the  house  is  yet  standing.  Sir  Alexander  having  three  sons,  who  were 
killed  by  his  said  neighbours  and  their  associates,  so  that  he  had  only  remaining 
two  daughters,  Isabel  and  Jean  Kinlochs.  The  first  was  married  to  Ramsay  of 
Leuchars,  and  got  with  her  the  barony  of  Cruvie;  she  had  only  one  daughter,  who 
was  married  to  Sir  David  Carnegie,  predecessor  of  the  Earl  of  Southesk,  who  got 
with  her  the  estate  of  Leuchars  and  Cruvie.  The  other  daughter,  Jean  Kinloch, 
was  married  to  Sandilands  of  Abercromby,  and  he  got  with  her  the  barony  of 
Weatherby,  and  some  other  feus  about  it;  the  old  writs  ot  which  are  in  the  hands 
of  the  above-mentioned  Laird  of  Wishaw,  possessor  of  these  lands. 

Sir  Alexander  Kinloch  of  that  Ilk  died  without  male  issue,  so  that  the  above- 
mentioned  Andrew  Kinloch,  his  brother,  came  to  be  heir-male  and  representer  of 
the  family  of  Kinloch  and  Cruvie.  I  have  seen  a  disposition  by  the  abbot  and 
monks  of  Balmerino  of  the  lands  of  Little-Kinnire,  to  and  in  favours  of  an  ho- 
nourable man,  Andrew  Kinloch  in  Lithrie,  for  the  sum  of  200  merks,  and  for  up- 
holding the  walls  of  that  abbacy,  dated  at  Balmerino  the  5th  of  May  1529;  he  had 
no  sons,  but  one  daughter,  Elizabeth,  who  was  married  to  Robert  Paterson  of  Dun- 
mure,  with  whom  he  got  with  her  the  above-mentioned  lands,  upon  condition  that 
he  and  his  heirs,  with  his  wife,  took  upon  them  the  name  and  arms  of  Kinloch  ; 


APPENDIX.  n-j 

which  faiHng,  the  lands  were  to  return  to  George  Kinloth  tlie  uncle,  iis  by  the 
contract  of  marriage.  Robert  peitbrmed  the  condition  of  the  contract,  in  taking  on 
the  name  of  Kinloch  and  arms  with  his  lady:  He  had  a  son,  Andrew,  who,  after 
coming  to  be  a  man,  enters  into  a  contract  with  his  grand-uncle  George  Kinloch, 
portioner  of  Lithrie,  that  he  might  freely  return  to  the  name  of  Paterson,  and 
that  the  said  George  should  take  no  advantage  of  him  by  virtue  of  his  mother's 
contract  of  marriage.  Which  contract  I  have  seen  in  the  hands  of  Mr  David 
Kinloch  of  Conland,  in  the  shire  of  Fife,  son  of  Mr  George  Kinloch,  portioner  of 
Lithrie,  great-grandson  of  the  above  George,  with  whom  Andrew  Paterson  of  Dun- 
mure  made  the  last  contract;  So  that  the  said  David  is  the  heir-male  and  repre- 
senter  of  the  ancient  family  of  Kinloch  and  Cruvie. 

In  the  New  Register,  David  Kinloch  of  Aberborthie,  descended  of  Cruvie, 
bears  azure,  a  boar's  head  erased  betwixt  three  mascles  or;  for  crest,  a  young 
eagle  perching,  and  looking  up  to  the  sun  in  its  splendour:  motto,  Non  degcner. 
(L.  R.)     Of  Inm  is  descended  Sir  James  Kinloch  of  that  Ilk  in  Angus. 

David  Kinloch  of  Gourdie  bears  azure,  on  a  cheveron  between  three  mascles 
or,  a  boar's  head  erased  of  the  field,  and  a  flower-de-luce  of  the  second  ;  crest,  an 
eagle  soaring  aloft,  proper :  motto,  Tet  higher.     L.  R. 


MACKENZIE  of  Garloch. 


THE  first  of  this  family  was  Hector  Mackenzie,  eldest  lawful  son  by  a  second 
marriage  of  Alexander  Mackenzie,  seventh  Laird  and  Baron  of  Kintail,  (one  of 
the  progenitors  of  the  noble  family  of  Seaforth)  procreate  betwixt  him  and  Mar- 
garet, daughter  of  Macdonald  of  Morell,  his  second  wife. 

This  Hector,  by  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal  granted  by  King  James  IV. 
dated  at  Edinburgh  the  8th  day  of  April  1513  years,  and  25th  of  his  majesty's 
reign,  had  the  lands  and  barony  of  Garloch,  Glassletter,  and  pertinents,  heritably 
disponed  to  him  and  his  heirs-male,  for  military  service.  He  was  at  the  battle  of 
Flodden  with  the  said  king,  and  was  thereafter  tutor  of  Kintail.  He  married  Anne, 
daughter  to  Macdonald  of  Moydart,  by  whom  he  had 

John,  his  eldest  son  and  successor  in  the  above  lands,  who  married  Agnes. 
Eraser,  daughter  to  James  Eraser,  tutor  of  Lovat,  and  second  lawful  son  of  Hugh 
Lord  Eraser  of  Lovat ;  by  which  marriage  he  got  the  lands  of  Kinkell,  and  several 
others  in  the  low  country  ;  for  which  the  family  has  been  in  use  to  quarter  the 
Eraser's  arms  with  their  own.  She  bare  to  him  several  children,  the  eldest  where- 
of was 

John  Mackenzie  of  Garloch,  who  succeeded  bis  father,  and  married  Anne, 
daughter  to  ^neas  Macdonald  of  Glengary,  by  whom  he  had 

Alexander  Mackenzie  of  Garloch,  who  married  Mackenzie, 

daughter  to  Roderick  Mackenzie  of  Redcastle.  The  eldest  son  of  which  marriage 
was 

Kenneth  Mackenzie  of  Garloch,  who,  anno  1635,  married  Catharine,  daughter 
to  Sir  Donald  Macdonald  of  Slate,  by  whom  he  had  no  issue,  and  by  a  second  mar- 
riage with  Anne,  daughter  to  Grant  of  that  Ilk,  by  a  daughter  of  Ogilvie  Earl  of 
Eindlater,  anno  1640,  he  had  for  his  son  and  successor, 

Alexander.  Mackenzie  of  Garloch,  who,  in  anno  i6jo,  married  Barbara  Mac- 
kenzie, daughter  of  Sir  John  Mackenzie  of  Tarbet,  by  whom  he  had  one  son, 

Kenneth  Mackenzie,  who  succeeded  his  father,  and,  in  anno  1700,  married. 
Margaret,  daughter  of  Sir  Rorie  Mackenzie  of  Eindon.  The  eldest  son  of  which 
marriage  is 

Alexander  M.\ckenzie,  now  of  Garloch,  who  succeeded  his  father,  anno  1704, 
while  an  infant. 

The  achievement  of  the  family,  as  recorded  in  the  Lyon  Register,  is,  quarterly, 
fiiit  and  fourth  azure,  a  hart's  bead  cabossed,  and  attired  wth  ten  tynes,  or ;  se- 
Vol.  II.  4  O 


-8  APPENDIX. 

cond  and  third  azure,  three  tVasiers  argent.  Which  shield  is  timbred  with  helmet 
and  mantlings  befitting  his  quality ;  and,  on  a  wreath  of  his  colours  is  set,  tor 
crest,  a  dexter  arm,  holding  a  garland  of  laurel,  all  proper ;  with  the  motto,  Ftr- 
tute  et  valore. 

Of  this  family  are  descended  the  Mackenzies  of  Balmaduthy,  Letterew,  and 
Mountgerald,  and  Mr  WiUiam  Mackenzie  of  Davachcairny,  and  John  Mackenzie 
of  Lochend,  uncles  to  the  present  Garloch,  who  have  right  to  carry  the  above- 
arms  with  suitable  difterences. 


MELVILLE. 


THE  surname  of  Melville  is  ancient  with  us,  and  of  old  designed  De  Mala  Villa. 
An  account  of  which  1  here  subjoin,  having  omitted  it  accidentally  in  the  first 
part  of  the  System  of  Heraldry.  Some  say,  the  first  of  the  name  came  from  France 
(as  Sir  George  Mackenzie  in  his  manuscript.)  But  others,  more  rightly,  from  a 
gentleman  who  accompanied  Queen  Margaret,  the  wife  of  King  Malcolm  III. 
from  Hungary  ;  as  in  a  manuscript  of  the  family  of  Melville,  which  I  did  see  in 
the  custody  of  Captain  George  Melville  of  Crescent-Hall. 

The  first  of  the  name  of  Melville  got  several  lands  in  Lothian  from  King  Mal- 
colm II.  which  he  called  after  his  own  name.  But  be  this  as  it  will,  the  Melvilles 
were  very  considerable  in  the  reign  of  King  William,  both  for  the  many  lands 
they  enjoyed,  and  great  offices  they  held  under  the  crown. 

In  the  above-mentioned  manuscript  there  is  a  short  abstract  of  a  charter  of  con- 
firmation by  King  William,  to  Galfrid  Melville,  and  his  son  George,  of  some  lands 
which  formerly  belonged  to  Macbeth,  which  shows  their  antiquity. 

About  which  time  there  were  three  considerable  families  of  the  name  :  As  Mel- 
ville of  Melville-Castle  in  Lothian,  Melville  of  Raith  in  Fife,  and  Melville  of 
Glenbervie,  in  the  county  of  Kincardine. 

Melville  of  Melville-Castle  seems  to  have  been  the  principal  family.  Galfred  de 
Maleville,  in  the  reign  of  King  William,,  gave  the  church  of  Maleville  to  the  monks 
of  Dunfermline,  for  prayers  to  be  said  ^ro  animabus  Davidis  regis,  et  Malcomijuni- 
oris,  et  pro  animabus  antecessorum  meorum  coram  sepultura  pradictorum  regum  :  As 
appears  from  a  copy  of  the  charter,  to  be  found  in  my  Lord  Haddington's  Col- 
lections, in  the  Lawyers'  Library;  where  there  are  also  several  other  char- 
ters of  John  de  Meleville,  Gregorie  de  Melevil,  and  William  de  Melml  of  Melville 
Castle  ;  but  the  family  ended  in  an  heiress,  Agnes  Melville,  married  to  Sir  John 
Ross  of  Halkhead,  ancestor  to  the  Lord  Ross. 

Fhilip  de  Maleville,  Vicecomes  de  Merns,  in  the  reign  of  King  Alexander  II.  was 
ancestor  of  the  Melvilles  of  Glenbervie.  King  David  II.  grants  a  charter  to  John 
Melville  of  the  barony  of  Glenbervie  (in  Ret.  R.  Dav.  II.)  This  family,  in  the 
reign  of  King  James  II.  ended  in  an  heir-female,  Giles  Melville,  married  to  Sir 
John  Auchinleck  of  that  Ilk,  by  whose  grandchild  and  heir-female,  in  the  time 
of  King  James  IV.  the  barony  of  Glenbervie  went  by  marriage  to  Sir  William 
Douglas  of  Braidwood,  son  to  Archibald  Earl  of  Angus.  Melville  of  Glenbervie 
carried,  argent,  a  fesse  betwixt  three  crescents,  gules;  as  also  did  Melville  of  Dysart, 
and  Melville  of  Carnbie,  by  our  old  books  of  blazuns. 

The  only  remaining  branch  of  the  ancient  family  of  Melville  is  that  of  Raith  : 
The  first  of  which  was  Walter  de  Maleville,  a  son  of  the  above-mentioned  Galfred 
de  Maleville,  whose  successor.  Sir  John  de  Mnlevitie,  in  the  county  of  Fife,  is  one 
of  the  barons  in  the  Ragman  Roll  who  swore  fealty  to  King  Edward  I.  of  England, 
anno  1296.  From  whom  descended  John  Melville  of  Raith,  to  whom  WiUiam  Scott 
of  Balwyrie  grants  a  charter  of  the  lands  of  Pitscottie,  which  is  without  a  date, 
date.  The  witnesses  are  Rohertus  Senescalltis,  Thomas  Sibbald,  John  ofWeenu,  Wil- 
liam of  Lundon,  Knights ;  John  of  Glen,  John  of  B:  wd,  and  Duncan  Ramsay, 
j^migeri.  I  likewise  saw,  in  the  hands  of  Captain  Melville  of  Crescent-Hall,  a 
3 


APPENDIX.  19 

mutual  contract  betwixt  the  Laii-dof  Werayss,  and  John  Melville  ofRuith,  anent  a 
water-gang  to  Schaw's  mill,  of  the  date  1420. 

From  whom  was  descended  William  Melville  of  Raith,  whose  son  and  heir  Sir 
John,  a  great  favourite  of  King  James  V.,  in  the  reign  of  Queen  Mary,  for  professing 
the  protestant  religion,  lost  his  life  in  the  year  1549,  leaving  behind  liim,  by  his  lady 
Helen,  daughter  of  Alexander  Napier  of  Meichiston,  ancestor  to  the  Lord  Napier, 
six  sons  and  two  daughters,  first,  John,  Laird  of  Raith  ;  second,  Robert,  Lord 
Melville  ;  third,  Sir  James  Melville  of  Halhill,  a  great  statesman  and  courtier,  who 
wrote  memoirs  exactly  of  his  own  time.  Fourth,  Mr  William,  Commendator  of 
Tongland  and  Kilwinning,  one  of  the  Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice.  Fifth, 
Sir  Andrew  Melvill  of  Garvock,  who  was  steward  of  the  household  to  Q^iieen  Mary 
and  King  James  VL  The  sixth  son  was  Captain  David  Melville  ot  Newmill. 
The  two  daughters,  Janet,  the  eldest,  was  married  to  Sir  William  Kirkaldy  of 
Grange,  and  Margaret  to  Sir  James  Johnstone  of  Elphingston.  The  second  son, 
Robert,  was  Vice-Chancellor  of  Scotland,  Treasurer-depute,  and  a  Lord  of  Ses- 
sion, in  the  reign  of  King  James  VL  and  by  that  king  was  made  a  peer,  by  the 
title  of  Lord  Melville,  in  the  year  1616.  He  was  succeeded  by  his  son  Robert 
Lord  Melville,  who  died  without  issue  1635.  Tlie  honour,  by  reason  of  an  en- 
tail, came  to  John  Melville  of  Raith,  the  great-grandson  to  John  Melville  of  Raith, 
elder  brother  to  Robert  first  Lord  Melville. 

Which  John  Melville  of  Raith,  the  third  Lord  Melville,  was  succeeded  by  his  son 
George  Lord  Melville,  who,  in  the  year  1690,  was  made  Earl  of  Melville  Lord 
Raith,  was  sole  Secretary  of  State,  and  Lord  High  Commissioner  to  the  first  and 
second  sessions  of  the  Parliament  1690.  He  married  Katharine,  daughter  of  Alex- 
ander Lord  Balgonie,  son  of  Alexander  first  Eiirl  of  Leven,  and  with  lier  had  three 
sons,  first,  Alexander  Lord  Raith,  who  died  without  issue  ;  second,  David,  who 
succeeded  his  father  in  his  estate  and  honour ;  third,  Mr  James  Melville  of  Bal- 
garvie. 

Melville  Earl  of  Melville,  Viscount  of  Kirkcaldy,  Lord  Raith,  Monimail,  and- 
Balwyrie,  carries,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  argent,  a  kss&  gules ;  second  and  third 
gules,  three  crescents  within  a  bordure,  argent,  charged  with  eight  roses  of  the  first, 
supported  on  the  dexter  with  a  ratch-liound,  and  on  the  sinister  by  an  eagle 
proper  ;  crest,  a  ratch  head  erased,  sable  :  Motto,  Denique  ccelum. 

David  succeeded  his  father  in  his  estate  and  honour ;  but  the  dignity  of  Leven 
being  the  elder  peerage,  his  lordship  now  goes  by  that  title,  and  carries  the  arms 
of  the  Earls  of  Leven  and  Melville.  He  was  a  long  time  Governor  of  the  Castle  of 
Edinburgh.  He  was,  by  her  majesty  Queen  Anne,  made  General  of  the  forces  in 
Scotland,  General  of  the  Ordnance,  and  thereafter  was  constituted  Lieutenant 
General,  and  Commander  in  Chief  of  all  her  majesty's  forces  in  this  kingdom.  All 
which  stations  his  lordship  held  till  the  year  1712.  He  married  Anne,  daughter 
of  Margaret  Countess  of  Wemyss,  by  whom  he  has  George  Lord  Balgony  and 
Raith,  and  a  son  Alexander.. 


MONCRIEF  OF  THAT  Ilk, 


AN  ancient  family  in  the  shire  of  Perth,  carries  argent,  a  lion  rampant,  gules, 
armed  and  langued  azure,  and  a  chief  ermine ;  crest,  a  demi-lion  as  the  former ; 
supporters,  two  men  armed  cap-a-pee,  bearing  pikes  on  their  shoulders  proper : 
motto,  Sur  esperance,  as  in  the  Lyon  Register. 

Which  arms  I  gave  before  in  the  First  Volume,  page  68  and  page  251,  where 
this  family  had  anciently  other  supporters,  viz.  two  hons,  as  in  Workman,  a  herald, 
his  manuscript  1604  ;  when  Sir  John  Moncrief  of  that  Ilk  assisted  as  one  of  the 
knights,  when  Sir  Andrew  Murray  of  Balvaird  was,  with  all  solemnity,  created 
Lord  Scone,  by  Alexander  Seaton  Earl  of  Dunfermline,  his  Majesty's  Viceroy  for 
the  time. 


50  APPENDIX. 

This  family  Was  of  great  antiquity,  and  had  an  opulent  fortune  in  lands,  called 
Moncrief,  from  which  they  took  their  surname,  and  was  the  original  family  of  the 
name.  There  is  a  charter  of  confirmation,  yet  extant,  of  the  lands  of  Moncrief 
to  John  de  Moncrief,  by  King  Alexander  III.  Which  family  continued  since  in 
possession  of  these  lands,  and  as  chief  of  the  name,  till  of  late,  that  Sir  John  Mon- 
crief of  that  Ilk,-  Baronet,  sold  the  estate  to  Sir  Thomas  Moncrief,  one  of  the 
Clerks  of  Exchequer.  He  was  succeeded  in  the  chieftainry  and  honour  of  baronet, 
by  his  brother-german.  Sir  James  Moncrief,  colonel  of  a  regiment  of  foot.  Upon 
the  death  of  Sir  James  without  male-issue,  the  honours  of  the  family  devolved 
upon  Sir  John  Moncrief  of  Tippermalloch,  eldest  son  of  Mr  Hugh  Moncrief  of 
Tippermalloch,  the  famous  physician,  second  lawful  son  of  Sir  William  Moncrief 
of  that  Ilk,  and  Dame  Anna  Murray,  daughter  to  the  Laird  of  Abercairny  ;  and 
the  said  Mr  Hugh  married  Isabel  Hay,  daughter  to  the  Laird  of  Megginch.  Her 
mother  was  married,  after  her  first  husband's  death,  to  Hay  of  Keillor,  afterwards 
Earl  of  Errol. 

The  said  Sir  John  married  his  cousin  Nicolas  Moncrief,  daughter  to  the  Laird  of 
Easter  Moncrief,  descended  of  a  second  son  of  Moncrief  of  that  Ilk,  and  had  Sir  Hugh 
Moncrief  of  Tippermalloch,  Baronet,  the  chief  and  representer  of  the  family  of 
Moncrief  of  that  Ilk,  who  carries  the  principal  coat  of  the  family  as  above  blazon- 
ed from  the  Lyon  Register. 

The  family  has  not  only  been  ancient,  but  very  considerable  in  the  country,  be- 
ing allied  with  many  great  and  honourable  families,  such  as  Athol,  Abercairny, 
Oliphant,  Ross  of  Craigie,  and  many  others,  which  may  be  seen  at  length  in  the 
Genealogical  History  of  their  families. 

There  are  several  cadets  of  this  family,  some  of  whom  I  shall  here  mention, 
whose  arms  are  in  the  Lyon  Register. 

Moncrief,  Commissar  in  the  king  of  France  his  army,  a  fourth  son  of  Mon- 
crief of  that  Ilk  in  Scotland,  carries  the  same  with  the  chief,  with  a  martlet  for 
difference. 

James  Moncrief,  merchant  in  Edinburgh,  descended  of  a  second  brother  of 
Thomas  Moncrief  of  that  Ilk,  bears  argent,  a  lion  rampant,  holding  in  his  dexter 
paw  a  rose,  between  two  mullets  gjiles  a  chief  ermine  ;  crest,  a  gillyflower  proper  : 
motto,  Diligentia  cresco. 

George  Moncrief  of  Reidie,  descended  of  Moncrief  of  that  Ilk,  carries  as 
his  chief,  crest,  and  motto,  the  same  ;  and,  for  difference,  a  red  rose  on  the  chief 
ermine. 

John  Moncrief  of  Murnipea,  descended  of  a  second  son  of  Reidie,  carries  as 
Reidie,  with  a  crescent  for  his  difference. 

David  Moncrief  of  Boghall,  lineally  descended  of  Sir  James  Moncrief  of  Easter 
Moncrief,  who  was  a  brother-german  to  Sir  John  Moncrief  of  that  Ilk,  bears 
argent,  a  lion  rampant  gules,  a  chief  ermine,  all  within  a  bordure  invected  of  the 
second,  charged  with  six  crescents  of  the  first :  motto,  Firma  spes. 

George  Moncrief  of  Sauchope,  sometime  Bailie  of  Crail,  bears  argent,  a  lion 
rampant  gules,  a  chief  ermine,  all  within  a  bordure  indented  of  the  second,  charged 
with  eight  besants  or ;  crest,  three  ears  of  rye  banded  together,  proper. 

Sir  Thomas  Moncrief,  designed  of  that  Ilk,  (who  purchased  these  lands)  bears 
argent,  a  lion  rampant  betwixt  two  mullets  in  fesse  gules,  a  chief  ermine  ;  crest,  a 
demi-lion,  as  the  former  :  motto,  Sur  esperance,  1679.  For  all  which  see  Lyon 
Register. 


GIFFORD  OF  BusTA. 


IN  my  former  volume  of  this  System,  page  59,  I  mentioned  the  ancient  name 
ef  GiFFORD,  said  to  have  come  from  England  to  Scotland  in  the  reign  of  Mal- 
colm Canmore ;  and  also  of  one  Hugo  de  Gifford,  a  witness  in  the  charters  of 


APPENDIX.  31 

William  King  of  Scotland.  The  chief  family  of  the  name  was  Gifford  of  Gif- 
ford-hall  and  Yestei-,  in  East  Lothian,  which  had  for  arms,  gules,  three  bars  er- 
mine. The  family  ended  in  four  daughters  about  the  year  1412.  The  eldest  of 
them  was  married  to  Sir  William  Hay,  Sheriff  of  Peebles.  He  got  with  her  the 
lands  of  Yester  and  Gitford-hali,  of  whom  is  dcicended  the  present  Marquis  of 
Tweeddale,  whose  family  has  ever  since  quartered  the  Gilford's  arms  with  their 
own.  The  other  three  daughters  were  married  to  Thomas  Boyd  of  Kilmarnock, 
Eustache  Maxwell  ofTe}liiig,  and  another  to  Macdowall  of  Makcrston,  all  eminent 
barons. 

There  was  another  family  of  the  name  Gifford  of  SherifF-hall,  in  Mid-Lothian,, 
which  carried- tlie  foresaid  arms,  and  ended  in  the  reign  of  King  James  111.  And 
of  late  1  am  informed  that  there  is  a  gentleman's  family  yet  extant  of  the  name 
of  Gifford,  in  the  island  of  Zetland,  now  represented  by  Thomas  Gifford  of  Busta, 
as  lineally  descended  from,  and  only  heir-male  of  the  ancient  family  of  Wetl;^rsta 
in  that  island,  who  has  about  these  200  years  past  carried  the  name  and  arms  of 
Gifford,  viz.  gules,  three  bars  ermine ;  crest,  a  hart's  head  proper  ;  motto.  Spare 
'when  you  have  naught ;  being  the  same  used  by  the  Marquis  of  Tweeddale ;  but 
whether  the  crest  and  motto  belonged  to  the  Giffords  of  Gifford-hall  and  Yester, 
I  know  not,  but  the  ai-ms  did,  and.  the  same  are  used  now  by  Thomas  Gifford  of 
Busta. 


WEMYSS  Earl  of  Wemyss. 


IN  my  first  volume  of  this  System,  page  276,  I  mentioned  the  ancient  and  ho- 
nourable family  of  Wemyss,  and  there  hinted  the  strong  tradition  of  their  de- 
scent from  the  illustrious  hero  Macduff  Thane  of  Fife  ;  which  tradition  has  been 
universally  owned  and  acknowledged  by  all  our  antiquaries,  though  they  are  not  so 
certain  as  to  the  precise  time  of  their  descent. 

Sir  RoberrSibbald  and  the  author  of  the  Genealogy  of  the  Macintoshes  allege. 
That  the  first  of  the  family  was  a  son  of  Duncan,  the  third  of  that  name,  and  sixth 
Earl  of  Fife.  But,  that  their  cadency  is  older,  appears  from  the  charter  of  Joannes 
de  Aiiuly,  Miles,  mentioned  by  me  in  the  foresaid  place,  which  charter  mentions 
terram  Domini  Michaelis  de  lYeymyss,  and  is  dated  1 1 65;  whereas  the  foresaid 
Dyncan  the  third  succeeded  to  his  father,  only  in  the  year  1154,  and  died 
1203  :  As  Mr  Crawfurd  in  his  Peerage  says  of  the  family  of  the  earls  of  Fife  ; 
so  it  is  improbable  that  the  first  of  that  family  could  be  the  son  of  this 
Duncan. 

And  therefore  I  think  that  what  I  have  already  asserted  in  the  First  Volume 
is  most  probable,  to  wit.  That  the  first  of  them  was  an  immediate  son  of  the 
great  Macduff,  who,  being  obliged  to  escape  Macbeth's  fury,  hid  himself  in 
those  coves  which  are  yet  to  be  seen  in  the  estate  of  Wemyss,  and  are  very  proper 
lurking  places  ;  and  from  thence  derived  afterwards  the  surname  to  himself  and 
posterity  :  for  Wemyss  is  but  the  Highland  word  for  coves  :  And  it  is  ordinary 
still  among  the  Highlanders  (whose  language  and  customs  then  obtained  in  Fife) 
to  design  a  man  from  some  extraordinary  circumstance  of  his  life,  such  as  this,  of 
his  lurking  in  the  coves. 

But  though  we  cannot  with  certainty  determine  the  precise  time  when  the 
Earl  of  Wemyss  came  of  Macduff,  because  the  original  writs  of  the  family  are  lost, 
yet  that  he  is  truly  descended  of  that  illustrious  stock,  I  think  there  are  very  good 
arguments  to  prove :  As 

\mo.  The  constant  traditon  of  the  family,  together  with  the  propriety  of  the 
ancient  monuments  of  Macduff's  valour,  such  as  his  target  and  other  armour, 
and  the  scull  of  Macbeth's  head,  which  Macduff  cut  off  at  Lumphannon,  and  car- 
ried south  with  him  as  a  trophy ;  which  are  still  preserved  (as  I  am  informed)  by 
the  family,  and  were  probablv  committed  to  then,  ac  the  principal  branch  in  the 

Vol.  li.  '  4  P 


-i  APPENDIX. 

collateral  mate  line,  when  the  direct  male  line  failed ;  hence  are  those  liiies  of  M*- 
Jolinston  in  his  character  of  Macduff: 

Addo  decus  priscis  mentis,  monumenta  vetusta 
Servat  adhuc  terum  Vemisiana  domus. 

zdo.  That  they  have  always  bore  the  ensigns  armorial  of  Macduff:  For  arms  are 
reckoned  surer  marks  of  cadency  than  surnames,  especially  in  descents  of  that 
antiquity.  Before  the  marriage  with  the  heiress  of  Inchmurtin,  the  barons  di 
Wemyss  bore  the  simple  armorial  of  Macduff,  with  the  marks  of  cadency :  But 
then  these  marks  were  kid  aside,  and  the  coat  of  Glen  of  Inchmartin  was  quar- 
tered with  their  paternal  coat  ;  and  have  so  stood  upon  their  seals  (as  you  have 
them  described  by  me  in  the  First  Volume)  from  1423  to  1707,  when  David  the 
second  Earl  of  Wemyss,  considering  himself  as  chief  of  the  name  ot  Wemyss,  and 
true  representative  of  the  ancient  Macduff,  thought  fit  to  disuse  the  coat  of  alli- 
ance, and  to  retain  only  the  single  armorial  of  Macduff  and  Wemyss ;  which  I 
have  blazoned  and  cut  in  copper,  in  the  Fourth  Plate  of  Achievements  of  the 
First  Volume ;  and  is  thus  described,  or,  a  lion  rampant  gules,  armed  and  langued 
trzure,  supported  by  two  lions,  and  a  swan  for  crest,  all  proper,  with,  the  mottO; 
Je  pense. 

^fio.  A  third  argument  of  the  Earl  of  Wemyss's  descent,  is  the  ancient  holding 
of  their  original  estiite  of  the  Earls  of  Fife  ;  which,  together  with  the  other  two 
proofs  above  mentioned,  are  a  good  evidence  that  the  first  of  them  was  a  son  of 
that  family,  to  whom  the  father  disponed  that  part  of  his  estate,  to  hold  of  himself" 
and  his  successors  in  the  direct  line,  since  there  is  not  the  least  appearance  of  the 
estate  coming  from  any  ether  hands,  or  that  it  was  in  any  other  family  prior  to 
them.  But  this  shall  be  further  cleared,  as  I  come  to  give  a  particular  account  of 
the  family  of  Wemyss,  at  least  of  the  most  remarkably  persons  of  them,  whom  Mr 
Crawfurd  has  omitted. 

The  first  of  the  name  I  find  on  record  is  the  foresaid  Michael  de  Wemyss,  in 
the  said  charter  of  Joa?ines  de  Aiiuly  ;  and  the  said  Michael  (as  I  am  informed)  is  a 
witness  in  the  charter  of  mortification  to  the  abbacy  of  Aberbrotlrock,  de  terra 
inter  Echkar  \fl  Kaldonar,  per  Thomnm  filium  Tmikardi;  and  this  is  confirmed  by 
King  William  in  the  beginning  of  his  reign,  as  in  chartulary  of  Aberbrothock  ;  Mr 
Crawfurd  tells  of  a  charter  of  Alexander  II.  his  reign,  in  the  custody  of  the  Duke 
of  Athol,  wherein  Michael  de  Wemyss,  miles  is  a  witness,  but  whether  he  was  the 
same  Michael,  or  a  son  of  his,  I  know  not. 

The  next  we  find  is  David  re  Wemyss,  who  was  Sheriff-Principal  of  Fife,  anno 
1239  ;  for  in  the  chartulary  of  the  abbacy  of  Dunfermline,  there  is  a  precept 
directed  Domino  Davidi  de  Wemyss,  yice-cvmifi  de  Fife,  to  pay  the  eighth  part  oi 
the  amerciaments  of  Fife  and  Fothrife,  imposed  in  the  Jastice  Air  at  Cupar,  to 
that  abbacy,  according  to  their  rights,  dated  at  Perth,  7th  October  1239,  and  of 
the  king's  reign  the  25th. 

In  the  chartulary  of  the  abbacy  of  Aberbrothock,  Domiims  Hugo  de  Wemyss 
is  witness  in  a  charter  by  that  abbot  to  Sir  John  Wishart  of  the  Mill  of  Ctoeveth, 
,  dated  anno  ii^i. 

This  is  all  of  the  surname  that  I  have  seen  upon  record,  prior  to  that  honourable 
person  that  went  ambassador  for  the  Maiden  of  Norway,  mentioned  in  the  First 
Volume  by  the  name  of  David,  from  all  our  historians  that  I  have  seen  ;  though 
I  am  since  informed  by  the  family  that  his  name  is  Michael  and  not  David,  which 
my  informer  says  is  clear,  by  an  indenture  between  Dominum  Michael  de  Wemyss 
y  Dominum  Michaelem  Scot  de  Balweerie,  milites,  in  pnesentia  Joannis  BallioH 
Regis,  apud  monajleriwn  de  Lundores,  dated  1294. 

This  Dominus  Michael  de  Wemyss,  as  my  informer  says,  sat  in  the  Parliament  at 
Ayr  1315,  which  settled  the  succession  of  the  crown,  failing  heirs-male  of  King 
P-obert  the  I.  upon  Edward  Bruce  his  brother. 

His  son  David  de  WE^rYss  succeeded  him,  who  was  one  of  the  barons  that,  in 
the  Parliament  1320,  signed  the  famous  letter  to  the  pope. 

He  was  married  first  to  Annabel,  daughter  to  Sir  William  St  Clair,  probably 
the  same  that  married  the  heiress  of  Orkney  :  for  there  is  an  authenticcopy  of  a 


APPENDIX.  33 

charter  signed  by  a  notar,  among  the  Earl  of  Wemyss's  writs,  wherein  Dav'ul  de 
Wemyss,  Jilitts  ii?  hiercs  Domini  Michaelis  de  Wemyss,  grants  Domines  Annabelltc, 
filiee  Domini  Gulielmi  de  Sto.  Claro  rnilitis,  sponsce  sua;,  and  to  the  heirs  procreate 
betwixt  them,  several  lands  in  Lochoreshire. 

He  was  married  next  to  Marjory  de  Rams(iy\  daughter  to  Walter  de  Ramsay  ; 
and  there  is  an  original  charter  (which  was  lent  by  the  late  Earl  of  Wemyss  to 
Mr  Simson  the  Q^ieen's  Historiographer,  but  not  returned)  wherein  K.ing  Robert  1. 
confirms  to  Di'vid  de  IVemyss,  miles,  and.  Marjory  his  spouse,  the  lands  of  Giass- 
mont  in  tenements  de  Kin^born,  erected  to  him  in  liberam  Baroniam.  This  char- 
ter is  dated  anno  regni  23,  anna  Domini  13:29.  It  was  this  Sir  David,  and  not  his 
great-grandchild,  (as  Mr  Crawfurd  supposeth)  that  in  an  original  charter,  without 
date,  (which  was  likewise  lent  to  Mr  Simson)  is  designed  ftliiis  et  hares  Domini 
Michaelis  de  IVemyss,  rnilitis,  wherein  he  makes  over  the  lands  of  Raith,  in  the 
barony  of  Lochore,  Damino  Juhanni  de  IVemyss,  avunculo  sua.  For  Walter  de 
Ramsay,  one  of  the  witnesses  in  the  charter  is  designed  Socero  meo  ;  and  Matthew 
de  Crambeth  Bishop  of  Dunkeld,  another  of  them,  died  in  1312,  and  consequently 
long  before  David,  the  grandchild  or  great-grandchild,  succeeded. 

His  son  Michael  de  Wemyss,  miles,  succeeded  about  the  year  1332,  who  ob- 
tained a  charter  from  Duncan.  Earl  of  Fife,  of  Easter  Monechy  and  Wester  Dron, 
(which  was  likewise  lent  out  to  Mr  Simson)  wherein  he  is  designed  Filius  quon- 
dam Davidis  de  IVemyss,  rnilitis.  This  Michael,  and  his  father  David,  and  grand- 
father Michael,  knights,  are,  all  three,  witnesses  to  a  charter  by  Duncan  Earl  of  Fife 
X.0  John  deCiepban  oi  Caxilo'^ic.  In  Rymer's  Fcedera  there  is,  anno  1336,  a  pre- 
cept by  King  Edward  III.  of  England  to  his  Treasurer  to  deliver  to  Michael 
de  Wemyss  knight,  coming  from  Scotland  to  our  Parliament  at  London,  Forty 
pounds  Sterling,  and  to  Henry  de  Ramsay  Ten  pounds. 

He  was  succeeded. by  his  son  Sir  David  de  Wemyss,  who  in  1343:  is  designed. 
David  de  Wemyss  miles,  tunc  Plcecomes  de  Fife,  as  witness  in  a  charter  by  Duncan 
Earl  of  Fife,  to  Green  of  Fairny  ;  and  so  hkewise  in  a  charter  by  D.  Helena  de 
Maxwell,  Domina  de  Kelly,  to  John  Dick  Strang  of  Easter  Pitcorthie  ;  and  this- 
last  is  confirmed  by  King  David  II.  Anno  Reg.  29.  Anno  Dom.  1358. 

To  him  succeeded  Sir  David  de  Wemyss  his^son,  who,  in  Rymer's  Fcedera  iJiSli 
is  designed  David  de  Wemyss  miles,  filius  %3  hares  Davidis  de  IVemyss  rnilitis  ; 
and  was  one  of  the  twenty  Scots  heirs  that  were  sent  hostages  for  payment  of  one 
hundred  thousand,  merks  Sterling,  for  King  David's  liberty. 

This  Sir  David,  having  no  heirs-male  cf  his  body,  tailzied  his  estate  to  Sir  John 
Wemyss  of  Rises,  and  to  Isabel  his  wife,  eldest  daughter  of  Isabel  of  Inchmartin 
his  heir-female,  and  to  the  heirs  of  their  body ;  which  failing,  to  return  to  the  col- 
lateral heir-male.  And  in  consequence  of  this  tailzie  Sir  David  resigns  his  lands 
in  the  hands  of  Robert  Stewart  Earl  of  Fife,  holden  de  pradicto  suo  comite,  in  fa- 
vours of  the  said  Sir  John.  This  resignation  was  solemnly  made  in  the  parish 
church  of  Wemyss,  anno  1373,  about  two  years  before  he  died,  and  is  recorded  at 
more  length,  with  the  witnesses'  names,  by  Mr  Crawfurd  in  his  Peerage  of  the 
family  of  Wemyss.  After  Sir  David's  death,  Sir  Allan  Erskine  confirmed  some 
lands  resigned  by  the  said  Sir  David,  to  the  said  Sir  John,  and  Isabel  his  wife,  and 
their  heirs;  which  failing,  dista  ternv  (saith  the  charter)  veris  haredibus  reverten- 
tnr.  And  by  an  indenture  between  the  said  Sir  John  Wemyss  of  Rires  and  one 
Duncan  de  Wemyss,  who  seems  to  have  been  the  heir-male,  dated  1376,  the  said 
Sir  John  binds  himself  to  keep. the  taibie  of  all  the  lands  which  belonged  to  um- 
quhile  David  of  IVemyss,  and  to  infeft  Duncan;  and  Duncan  is  to  put  into  the 
said  talzie  Over-Cambron;  and  a  duty  out  of  the  mill  of  Methil,  and  he  is  to  have 
Rires  and  Cambron  fiom  Sir  John.  And,  in  a!u:o  1419,  the  said  Duncan  actually 
got  Kincaldrum  froni  Sir  John. 

Whether  Isabel  of  lachmartin-was  a  niece  of  Sir  David's,  or  what  degree  of  re- 
lation she  bore  to  him,  does  not  appear  from  any  writs  that  I  have  seen.  But  it 
would  seem  that  Sir  Robert  Livingston  of  Drumrey,  or  his  lady,  stood  in  the  same 
propinquity  to  him,  and  that  he  was  not  satisfied  with  his  disposition  in  favours 
of  Sir  John  of  Rires:  For,  by  an  instrument  dated  1385,  it  appears  that  the  said 
Sir  Robert  took  infeftment  in  the  lands  of  Wemyss,  and  that  the  Lady  Inchmartin 
went  to  the  House  of  Wemyss  and  tore   his  sasine.in  pieces.     And  it  is  probable. 


34 


APPENDIX. 


that,  to  compose  the  differences,  Sir  Robert  got  the  lands  of  East-Wemyss,  (which 
were  reckoned  a  third  part  of  Wemyss-shire)  and  a  third  of  the  coal  and  salt  o£ 
West-Wemyss,  and  the  east  half  of  Lochore-shire;  all  which  I  find  to  have  gone 
from  the  family  to  the  Livingstons  of  Drumrey  about  this  time. 

After  Sir  David's  death,  which  was  before  December  1376,  Sir  Allan  Erskine, 
and  Isabel  of  Inch  martin,  his  wife,  served  heirs  to  him  in  the  estate  of  Wemyss, 
as  appears  by  their  two  daughters  serving  to  them.  And  Sir  John  of  Rires  seems 
to  have  possessed  it  more  in  their  right  than  by  the  disposition  and  resignation 
made  by  Sir  David :  And  therefore  we  find  by  authentic  writs  m  the  Earl  of 
Wemyss's  custody,  which  were  showed  to  me  by  Mr  Mackenzie  his  chaplain,  that 
after  their  death,  Isabel,  spouse  to  Sir  John  Wemyss  of  Rires,  together  with  her 
sister  Margaret,  spouse  to  Sir  John  Glen  of  Balmuto,  are  served  heiresses,  in  May 
1400,  to  Sir  Allan  Erskine  their  father,  and  to  Isabel  of  Inchmartin  their  mother, 
in  the  estate  of  Wemyss,  and  lands  of  Pitconachie,  within  the  shire  of  Fife;  and 
in  June  the  same  year  they  demanded  of  Robert  Earl  of  Fife,  a  precept  of  sasine 
in  these  lands,  which  the  said  earl  either  neglected  or  refused  to  grant.  And  in 
June  1419,  he  pursued  Sir  John  Wemyss  of  Rires  (whoselady  was  then  dead^ 
and  the  lady  Glen,  before  the  council,  for  uplifting  the  revenues  of  Wemyss,  be- 
fore he,  as  superior,  had  entered  them.  However  Sir  John,  in  his  lady's  right,  and 
the  Lady  Glen,  are  adjudged  to  be  in  the  legal  possession  of  the  estate,  because 
they  had  taken  precept  out  of  the  King's  Chapel,  and  presented  it  to  the  superior, 
anno  1401:  The  same  ladies  are  retoured  heiresses  to  their  mother  Isabel  of 
Inchmartin,  in  the  lands  of  Auchleven  and  Ardoven  in  Marr.  2inno  1403,  King 
Robert  IIL  gives  a  protection  to  Sir  John  of  Wemyss  for  the  lands  he  had  in  Athol 
by  his  wife. 

Sir  John  de  Wemyss  got  by  his  lady  (as  appears  by  the  confirmation-charter  of 
King  Robert  III.  to  him)  the  lands  of  Wemyss,  Wester-Raith,  Glenniston  and 
Powguild,  Myre-Cairny,  Newton,  Markinch,  Nether-Cambron,  Methil,  TulUebreek, 
Wester-Tarvat,  Lmerleven,  Muir-Cambus,  Dion,  Lochore,  Elcho,  Strathardel  and 
Inchmartin. 

Sir  John  having  built  the  chapel  of  St  Mary  of  Reires,  and  mortified  lands  to  a 
chaplain  anno  1404,  died  about  anno  1428,  leaving  issue  behind  him,  by  the  heiress 
Isabel,  first  David,  his  successor  in  the  estate  of  Wemyss,  designed  David  of  Methil 
in  his  father's  time  :  Second,  Michael  his  successor  in  the  estate  of  Reires,  which 
estate  went  with  a  daughter  to  Arthur  Forbes  of  Pitsligo  anno  1479.  Third,  An- 
drew. Fourth,  John  Wemyss  of  Kilmany,  who  married  Janet  Wardlaw,  niece  to 
Henry  Wardlaw  Bishop  of  St  Andi'ews,  and  got  with  her  the  lands  of  Lathocker 
and  Muirton,  and  of  him  are  the  Wemysses  of  Lathocker.  He  left  besides  two 
daughters,  the  one  married  to  Sir  Andrew  Gray  of  Foulis,  and  the  other  to  Hugh 
Eraser  of  Lovat. 

Sir  David  de  Wemyss,  Sir  John's  eldest  son,  married  Christiana  de.  Douglas, 
daughter  of  Sir  William  Douglas,  February  1423  ;  and,  leaving  issue  "by  her,  John, 
his  successor,  and  Euphame  ;  he  died  anno  143 1. 

Sir  John  was  minor  at  his  fathers  death,  and  when  scarce  eleven  years  old  was 
made,  by  his  uncle  and  tutor  Michael  de  Wemyss,  to  marry  Christian,  daughter  to 
Sir  Patrick  Ogilvie  of  Auchterhouse;  but  he  was  divorced  from  her  anno  1441, 
and  next  married  Margaret,  daughter  to  Sir  Robert  Livingston  of  Drumrey  and 
East-Wemyss,  by  whom  he  had  John  his  successor,  designed  in  his  father's  time 
John  of  Strathardel,  and  Grissel,  married  to  David  Boswell  of  Balmuto ;  he  died 
1502. 

This  Sir  John  Wemyss  married  Christian,  daughter  to  the  Lord  Abernethy  of 
Rothiemay,  upon  whom  he  begot  five  sons  and  one  daughter,  particularly  David 
his  successor,  designed  in  his  father's  life  David  of  Dron,  and  Thomas,  who,  in 
anno  1545  and  1550,  is  designed  Mr  Thomas  Wemyss  of  Winthank,.  and  Lord' 
of  Session,  and  John,  of  whom  was  descended  Henry  Wemyss,  Bishop  of  Galloway, 
and  of  the  Chapel-Royal  at  Stirling:  Sir  John  died  1506. 

And  his  son.  Sir  David  de  Wemyss,  is   retoured  heir  to  him  in  IVIay  1508,  who 

obtained  a  charter  from  King  James  IV.  dated  28th  August  1511,  erecting  the 

following  lands  into  one  barony  of  Wemyss,  viz.  the  lands  of  Wemyss-shire,  Little- 

Lun,  Tilliebreek,  Cameron-Mill,  the  Haugh,  Dunniface,  Pitconochie  and  West 

I 


APPENDIX.  35 

Tai-vat  in  Fife,  West-Dron,  Hill-Dron,  Elcho,  Bathabion,  Strathardel,  Ardargic 
and  Kinnaird  in  Perth,  and  Balhavel  in  Forfarshire.  He  married  first  Anna, 
daughter  to  Alexander  Earl  of  Huntly,  by  whom  he  had  three  sons  and  one 
daughter,  particularly  David  his  successor.  And  next  he  married  Janet,  daughter 
of  Andrew  Lord  Gray,  by  whom  he  had  John  VVcmyss,  who  got  in  appanage  Bel- 
havel  in  Forfar,  and  Kinnaird  in  Perth:  This  Sir  David  was  killed  at  the  battle  of 
Flodden,  9th  September  15 13.     And  in  May  15 14 

His  son  Sir  D.wip  VVemyss  of  that  Ilk  is  retoured  heir  to  him;  who  married  first 
Katharine  daughter  of  Henry  Lord  St  Clair,  anno  151 1,  and  had  by  lier  principally, 
John,  his  successor,  and  James,  the  first  of  the  family  of  Caskieberry,  of  whom  my 
Lord  Burntisland  was  descended  ;  as  are  also  Count  Wemyss  of  Brescia,  in  the  ter- 
ritory of  Venice,  and  several  other  illustrious  persons  abroad.  He  married  next  Mav- 
iota  Towers,  daughter  of  Innerleith,  anno  1525,  and  had  by  her  Captain  David 
Wemyss,  who  got  of  the  family  Strathardel  in  Perthshire,  and  Grissel,  married 
first  to  David  Boswell  of  Balmuto,  and  then  to  Patrick  Kynninmonth  of  that  Ilk. 
Sir  David  died  April  1544.  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son 

Sir  John,  who,  anno  J  530,  married  Margaret,  daughter  to  Sir  Adam  Otterburn 
•of  Redhall,  Lord  Advocate  to  King  James  V.  by  whom  he  had  David  his  suc- 
cessor, and  four  daughters,  married,  as  in  Crawfurd.  He  married  next  Janet 
Trail,  a  daughter  of  Blebo,  anno  1558*  and  had  by  her  Gavin  Wemyss  of  Pow- 
guild,  who  married  Katharine  Wemyss,  heiress  of  David  Wemyss  of  Winthank, 
the  son  of  the  above  Mr  Thomas,  of  whom  are  the  Wemysses  of  Winthank. 
He  had  likewise  by  her  a  daughter  called  Margaret,  married  to  Andrew  Ferny  of 
that  Ilk. 

This  Sir  John  made  a  considerable  figure  in  his  time;  for,  in  anno  1547,  he,' at 
the  head  of  the  Fife  gentlemen,  (as  Bishop  Lesley  says)  defeated  the  English  that 
landed  in  Fife,  and  killed  seven  hundred  of  them.  And  the  same  author  tells  us, 
that,  in  1556,  he,  with  the  Laird  of  Calder,  were  sent  commissioners  from  the 
three  hundred  barons  met  at  Edinburgh,  to  the  Queen  Regent  and  Council,  to 
dissuade  them  from  imposing  a  tax,  and  levying  of  foreign  troops,  and  prevailed. 
By  his  commission,  dated  the  9th  January  1559,  he  was  appointed,  by  Francis  and 
Mary,  king  and  queen,  to  be  the  Lieutenant  of  Fife,  Kinross  and  Clackmanan 
shires,  for  suppressing  of  the  rebels.  He  was  very  liberal  to  the  nunnery  of  Elcho, 
and  protected  them  from  insults;  therefore,  and  for  a  sum  of  money,  and  a  yearly 
pension  during  life,  they  disponed  to  him  all  their  rents,  and  made  him  their  he- 
ritable bailie.     He  died  at  Elcho,  January  1571,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son 

Sir  David,  who  married  Cecil  Ruthven,  daughter  to  William  Lord  Ruthven, 
anno  1556,  and  had  by  her  John  his  successor,  styled,  in  his  father's  life,  of  Tullie- 
breck;  James  of  Bogie,  the  first  of  the  family  of  Bogie;  David  of  Fingask,  the 
first  of  the  Wemysses  of  Fingask;  Patrick  of  Rumgaly,  and  Henry  of  Wester- 
Fudie,  the  first  of  the  Wemysses  of  Fudie :  He  had  likewise  five  daughters  ho- 
nourably married.  Sir  David  died  anno  1597,  to  whom  his  eldest  son  John,  called 
Birkenflower,  s\.\ccstdiedi;  who,  in  anno  1574,  married  Margaret,  daughter  to  Sir 
William  Douglas  of  Lochleven,  but  died  without*issue.  And  next,  in  1581,  he 
married  Mary,  daughter  to  James  Lord  Doune,  by  whom  he  had  David  his  eldest 
son,  married  to  Elizabeth,  daughter  to  Andrew  Earl  of  Rothes,  anno  1608;  but  he 
died  without  issue  anno  1610.  Second,  John  his  successor.  Third,  Cecilia,  mar- 
ried to  William  Earl  of  Tullibardin.  Fourth,  Jean,  to  Robert  Lord  Colvjll. 
Fifth,  Isabel,  married  to  Hugh  Lord  Lovat.  And,  sixth,  Katharine,  married  to 
John  Haldane  of  Gleneagles.  Tliis  Sir  John  had  the  admiralty  betwixt  Dysait 
and  the  water  of  Leven  disponed  to  him  by  the  Duke  of  Lennox,  anno  1610,  and 
died,  anno  1616,  aged  eighty-five. 

Sir  John  his  successor  was,  by  the  favour  of  King  Charles  I.  made  a  baronet, 
25th  May  1625,  then  created  Lord  Wemyss  of  Elcho,  ist  April  1628,  and  after- 
wards Earl  of  Wemyss  25th  June  1633.  He  married  Jean,  daughter  to  Patrick 
Lord  Gray,  anno  1610,  and  had  by  her  David  his  successor,  and  five  daughters, 
married,  as  in  Crawfurd.  Anno  1630  he  purchased  from  James  Lord  ColviU  the 
barony  of  East-Wemyss,  which  went  from  the  family  to  the  Livingstons  of  Drum-- 
rev,  from  about  the  year  138:;,  and  died  22d  iSfovember  1649. 

'Vol.  II.  '^  4  0^ 


30  APPENDIX. 

David  Earl  of  Wemyss  succeeded,  who  married  first  Anna,  daughter  to  Robert 
Lord  Burleigh,  by  whom  he  had  only  Lady  Jean,  married  first  to  Archibald  Earl 
of  Angus,  and  next  to  George  Earl  of  Sutherland :  Then  Eleanor,  daughter  to 
John  Earl  of  Wigton,  by  whom  he  had  no  issue.  But,  by  his  third  wife.  Lady 
Margaret  Leslie,  my  Lady  Dowager  of  Balgonie  and  of  Buccleugh,  he  had  a  daughter, 
Margaret,  in  whose  favour  he  resigned  the  honours  of  the  family,  and  thereupon 
obtained  a  patent  from  the  king,  with  the  precedency  of  her  grandfather's  crea- 
tion, as  appears  by  a  charter,  recorded  in  the  Chancellary  ad  annum  1672.  The 
said  Earl  David  died  anno  1680,  and  was  succeeded  by  the  said 

Margaret  Countess  of  Wemyss,  who,  in  her  father's  lifetime,  was  married  to  Sir 
James  Wemyss,  knight,  descended  of  the  family  of  Caskieberry,  who  thereupon 
was  dignified  with  the  title  of  Lord  Burntisland  for  life.  And,  dying  in  1683,  left 
issue  by  the  said  Countess  David  Lord  Elcho,  and  two  daughters,  married,  as  in 
Cravvturd's  Peerage.  Countess  Margaret  died  anno  1705,  and  was  succeeded  by 
her  son  David,  the  second  Earl  of  Wemyss,  who,  in  March  1705, 'was  made  Lord 
High  Admiral  of  Scotland,  and  admitted  to  the  Privy  Council  by  Queen  Anne. 
He  married  first  Anne,  daughter  to  William  Duke  of  Queensberry,  anno  1697,  by 
whom  he  had  David  Lord  Elcho,  who  died  i6th  December  1715,  not  turned  of 
seventeen,  and  James  his  successor:  Then  Mrs  Mary  Robinson,  a  rich  English  lady, 
by  whom  he  had  no  issue:  And  last  of  all  Elizabeth,  daughter  to  Henry  Lord  St 
Clair,  by  whom  he  has  living  two  daughters.  He  died  nth  March  1720,  and  was 
succeeded  by  his  son 

James,  the  present  Earl  of  Wemyss,  who  married  Janet,  daughter  to  Colonel 
Francis  Chatteris  of  Amisfield,  and  his  lady,  Helen,  daughter  to  Mr  Alexander 
Swinton,  one  of  the  Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice,  a  second  son  of  the  ancient 
family  of  Swinton  of  that  Ilk,  in  the  shire  of  Berwick. 


HAMILTON  OF  Olivestob. 


JAMES  HAMILTON  of  Olivestob,  Advocate,  son  and  heir  of  Captain  Thomas 
Hamilton  of  Olivestob,  and  Grissel  his  wife,  daughter  of  Hamilton  of  Westport, 
and  Anne  his  wife,  daughter  of  Sir  Patrick  Hamilton  of  Little-Preston,  brother  to 
Thomas  first  Earl  of  Haddington.  _ 

Alexander  de  Hamilton  is  designed  in  a  charter,  dated  penult  day  of  Novem- 
ber 1452,  armiger,  frater-germanus  Domino  de  Hamilton,  and  was  the  first  of  the 
family  of  Westport. 

The  said  Captain  Thomas  Hamilton  was  third  son  to  John  Hamilton  of  Muir- 
house  in  Mid-Lothian,  and  Anne  his  wife,  only  daughter  to  Elphinstone  of  Inner- 
divot,  who  was  a  son  of  the  I^d  Elphinstone. 

Which  John  was  a  son  of  Mr  William  Hamilton  of  Bardanock,  a  second  son  of 
Hamilton  of  Boardlan,  the  first  of  which  family  was  fourth  son  of  Sir  David  Ha- 
milton of  that  Ilk. 

The  said  James  Hamilton  of  Olivestob,  male  descended  of  Hamilton  of  Board- 
lan, carries  gules,  thiee  cinquefoils  argent,  within  a  bordure  embattled  or;  crest, 
an  antelope's  head  couped  argent,  gorged  and  •  attired  gules :  motto,  Invia  virtuti 
perziia. 


Of  the  rise  of  the  ancient  and  principal  family  of  KENNEDY  Earls  of 
CASSILIS,  with  .an  account  of  some  of  their  descendants. 

IN  the  First  Part  of  this  System,  page  158,  following  Mr  Crawfurd's  Peerage,  I 
brought  the  first  of  the  name  and  family  from  one  Kenneth,  an  Irish  or  Highland 


APPENDIX.  37 

Scotsman,  whose  posterity  wcie  sui-named  Kennedy  from  him;  which  I  find  to  be 
a  groundless  conjecture,  after  better  vouched  information:  tor  1  find  those  of  the 
family  to  have  been  ancient  proprietors  and  possessors  in  the  baihary  of  Carrick, 
before  patronimics  were  in  use:  and  had  their  first  name  from  that  country  they 
possessed,  but  afterwards  changed  their  names  from  Carrick  to  Kennedy  ;  as 
appears  by  the  following  connection  of  charters  from  father  to  son,  still  extant. 

The  first  of  whicli  is  a  grant  by  Nicolauj  of  Carrick,  son  to  Duncan  of  Carrick, 
to  the  nuns  of  North-Berwick,  in  and  to  the  lands  and  church  of  St  Cuthbert  at 
Maybole,  anno  1220,  in  the  reign  of  King  Wdliam;  so  that  his  father  Duncan 
must  have  lived  in  the  reign  of  King  Malcolm  IV.  which  began  1153. 
'  NiGELLL's,  Earl  of  Carrick,  grants  to  Rolland  of  Carrick,  son  of  the  above  Ni- 
colaus  of  Cain ck,  and  to  his  hens,  the  bailiary  of  Carrick,  to  be  caput  totius  pro- 
genici  sues,  i.  e.  chief  of  his  name,  and  to  have  the  command  of  all  the  men  in 
Carrick,  under  the  said  Earl  and  his  successors.  Which  grant  King  Alexander 
111.  coiifiims ;  and,  after  him,  Robert  III.  confirms  the  same  grant  to  his  family, 
being  then  called  Kennedies. 

Gilbert  of  Carrick,  son  of  Rolland  of  Carrick,  submits  a  difference  between 
him  and  the  nuns  of  North-Berwick,  1285,  to  Robert  Bruce  Earl  of  Carrick,  fa- 
ther to  King  Robert  I  and  to  Robert,  Bishop  of  Glasgow,  to  which  Gilbert  of 
Carrick's  seal  is  appended,  having  the  very  same  shield  of  arms  which  the  family 
of  Cassilis  carries  at  this  day  >  Which  shows  that  they  had  the  double  tressure, 
fletiiy  and  contie-fleuiy,  with  flower-de-luces  to  their  arms,  long  before  they  match- 
ed with  the  royal  family. 

In  the  the  17th  chapter,  of  the  Cbeveron,  in  the  first  volume,  I  gave  the  arms 
of  the  old  Earls  of  Carrick,  viz.  argent,  a  cheveron,  gules,  as  in  the  manuscripts 
of  Sir  David  Lindsav  of  the  Mount,  and  Sir  James  Balfour's  blazons,  both  princi- 
pal heralds,  who  give  the  same  to  the  old  Earls  of  Carrick,  before  the  M'Dougals 
or  Bruces  had  that  title,  and  who  carried  different  arms  from  those.  So  that  it  ap- 
pears that  the  family  of  the  name  of  Carrick  were  of  the  old  Earls,  and  carried, 
argent,  a.  chtvtron  gules ;  but  afterwards  accompanied  the  cheveron  with  three 
cross  croslets  fitched  sable  ;  so  that  they  were  great  men  anciently  :  And  of  late, 
by  marriage  with  Mary  Stewart,  daughter  to  King  Robert  UI. 

Duncan  of  Carrick,  son  to  Gilbert  of  Carrick,  gives  the  patronage  of  Kirkbride 
in  Carrick,  to  the  nuns  of  North-Berwick;  to  which  grant  Malcolm  Earl  of  Eife 
was  a  witness. 

-  King  Robert  I.  gave  a  remission  to  Sir  Gilbert  of  Carrick,  son  of  the  above 
Duncan,  for  his  surrendering  of  Lochdune  Castle  to  the  English ;  and  restores  him 
to  the  government  thereof,  with  the  lands  thereto  belonging :  Which,  from  that 
time  to  this  day,  continues  still  a  part  of  the  Earl  of  Cassilis'  property. 

At  this  time,  and  a  little  before,  they  began  to  take  the  name  of  Kennedy,  be- 
cause of  their  grant,  as  caput  totius  progeniei  sua,  being  chief  of  the  name  men- 
tioned before,  which  tire  Irish  words  Kean  na-ty  signifies ;  for  Kean  is  the  head, 
and  na  of,  ty  the  house  or  family,  and  Ken-nedy  is  to  this  day  pronounced  Kean- 
naty  by  the  people  of  Carrick  ;  and  also  several  charters  in  record  have  Carrick  in 
the  bosom,  and  Kennedy  on  the  margin.  They  had  taken  the  name  of  Kennity,  or 
Kennedy,  before  the  time  mentioned ;  for  John  Kennedy,  Chancellor  to  King 
John  Baliol,  is  mentioned  in  Prynne's  History,  and  Domhius  Alexander  Kennedy,  with 
several  others  of  that  name,  page  652. 

Sir  John  Kennedy,  son  of  the  above  Sir  Gilbert  of  Carrick,  is  one  of  the  com- 
missioners (mentioned  in  Rymer's  Fadera  Angliae)  upon  the  treaty  at  Newcastle, 
for  dehvering  up  to  the  Scots  King  David  Bruce,  in  the  year  1354. 

Sir  Gilbert  Kennedy,  Sir  John's  son,  is  delivered  as  one  of  the  hostages  for  King 
David,  in  anno  1357. 

King  Robert  II.  confirms  to  Sir  John  Kennedy,  son  to  the  above  Sir  Gilbert, 
the  lands  of  Denure,  in  the  second  year  of  his  reign ;  to  which  his  son  Sir  Gil- 
bert Kennedy  is  a  witness. 

King  Robert  lU.  confirms  to  James  Kennedy,  son  of  his  beloved  cousin  Sir  Gil- 
bert Kennedy,  the   bailiary  of  Carrick,  chief  of  his  name,  and  the   command  of 
the  militia  in  Carrick,  under  the  Earl  of  Carrick,  dated  at  Dundonald  2bth  Janu- 
I 


38  APPENDIX. 

ary  1405 ;  where  also  the  king  gives  the   lands  of  Dalrymple  to  James  Kennedj 
and  Mary  Stewart  his  spouse,  daughter  to  the  said  King  Robert  III. 

These  are  the  Earl  of  Cassihs'  predecessors,  which  can  easily  be  vouched  from  the- 
public  records.  Many  of  the  eldest  of  these  charters  were  put  in  the  hands  of  Mr 
Hay  of  Drumboot,  which  he  is  printing  in  a  pamphlet. 


KENNEDY  of  Bennan. 


Kennedy  of  Bennan  is  an  old  family  of  the  name ;  for  John  Kennedy,  son  of 
Henry  Kennedy  of  Bennan,  obtained  a  charter  from  King  James  II.  in  the  year 
1450,  as  in  the  general  register  ;  which  shows  they  were  then  a  standing  family. 

His  successors  continued  in  the  natural  possession  of  this  estate,  from  father  to 
son,  until  the  year  1560,  that  Katharine  Kennedy,  heiress  of  Bennan,  was  mar- 
ried to  Hugh  Kennedy,  second  son  of  Thomas  Kennedy  of  Bargeny,  whose  origi- 
nal contract  of  marriage  is  still  to  be  seen  in  the  possession  of  that  family,  and 
bears  date  at  Bargeny  the  8th  of  June  1560;  to  which  contract  Thomas  Kennedy, 
elder  and  younger  of  Bargeny,  subscribe  their  names,  and  M'Alexander  of  Dal- 
rcoch  is  a  witness. 

The  eldest  son  of  this  marriage  married  a  daughter  of  Ross  of  Galston  and  Hen- 
ning,  and  his  eldest  son  and  successor,  Hugh,  married  Margaret  Cathcart,  daughter 
to  James  Cathcart  of  Genoch,  whose  eldest  son  and  heir,  Hugh,  married  Isabel 
Wardlaw,  niece  to  Sir  John  Wardlaw  of  Pitrevie  :  Their  son  is  Hugh  Kennedy 
now  of  Bennen. 

This  family  has  claimed  the  armorial  bearing  of  Kennedy  of  Bargeny,  ever  since 
that  family  was  extinct,  as  being  the  last  cadet  of  that  family,  which  were,  quar- 
terly, first  and  fourth  argent,  a  cheveron  gules,  between  three  cross  croslets  fitch- 
ed,  sahJe  ;  second  and  third  azure,  three  flower-de-luces  or,  as  by  Esplin  and  other 
illuminate  books. 


KENNEDY  07  Balmaclanachan. 


KENNEDY  of  Balmaclanachan,  vulgarly  called  Earclanachan,  and  now  Kil- 
kerran,  hes  on  the  south  side  of  the  Water  of  Girvan,  in  the  bailiary  of  Carrick, 
shire  of  Ayr,  and  parish  of  Daillie. 

In  the  year  1361,  John  Kennedy  received  a  charter  of  confirmation  to  these 
lands,  dated  at  Dumbriton  in  the  -p-A  year  of  King  David's  reign ;  as  in  the  ge- 
neral register. 

This  man's  heirs  male  were  served  and  retoured  in  common  form  as  heirs  and 
proprietors  thereof,  until  Eliza'oeth  Kennedy  became  heiress,  whereby  the  male 
line  was  interrupted  ;  but  she  dying  without  issue,  it  was  again  restored  in  the  per- 
son of  Gilbert  Kennedy  her  father's  brother,  who  infeft  himself  as  her  nearest  heir; 
at  the  tower  of  Balmaclanachan,  the  r6th  day  of  June  1517.  He  again  resigns 
his  lands  to  his  son  George,  reserving  a  liferent  to  himself,  and  a  tierce  to  Ehza- 
beth  Blair  his  wife,  dated  at  Balmaclanachan  the  28th  of  June  1538.  Whereup- 
on his  son  George  infefts  himself,  and  Janet  Kennedy  his  wife,  who  was  daughter  of 
Patrick  Kennedy  of  Bargalton  and  Camciscan,  in  the  lands  of  Balmaclanachan; 
The  lands  of  Camciscan  fell  afterwards  into  the  hands  of  Balmaclanachan,  and 
were  sold  to  Robert  Wallace,  son  of  Hugh  Wallace  of  Cairnhill,  by  Janet  Kennedy, 
Lady  Balmaclanachan,  with  consent  of  George  Kennedy  her  husband,  and  her 
sister  Egidia  Kennedy,  widow  of  John  Grierson  of  Lag.  Two  of  their  seals  are  ap- 
pended to  the  resignation,  dated  at  Edinburgh  the  5th  of  May  1562,  and  at  Drum- 
lanrig  the  4th  of  April  1563.  This  George  Kennedy  of  Balmaclanachan  bought 
the  lands  of  Glenmuck,  Bellimore,  &-c.  from  John  Mure  of  Rowallanj  whose  dis- 
position is  dated  at  Balmaclanachan  the  24th  September  1551. 

In  the  year  1566,  he  dispones  his  heritable  estate  to  his  eldest  son  Gilbert,  dat- 
ed at  Balmaclanachan,  May  loth. 


APPENDIX.  39 

Gilbert  dispones  his  lands  to  his  second  son  David,  resei\ing  a  hTerent  to  liim- 
self  and  his  wife  Margaret  jK.ennedy,  daughter  to  Gilbert  K.ennedy  ot"  Girvanmains, 
dated  at  Edinburgh  23d  December  161 7.  (Secretary's  Register.)  David  Kenne- 
dy infefts  himself,  and  Janet  Kennedy  his  spouse,  daughter  to  David  Kennedy  in 
Maxwelston :  And  in  the  year  1633,  oif  the  3d  of  February,  at  Holyroodhouse, 
he,  with  consent  of  his  brother  Oliver  Kennedy,  father  of  the  late  deceased  John 
Kennedy  of  Craig,  resigns  his  lands  to  his  son  David,  who  infefts  himself,  and 
Jean  Hunter  his  spouse,  daughter  to  Hunter  of  Hunterston.  He  died  on  the  30th 
of  July  16S9,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  eldest  son  Robert,  still  alive.  The  arms 
which  this  family  has  always  been  in  use  to  bear,  as  by  their  seals,  and  that  above 
mentioned,  are,  argent,  a  chcveron  gules,  betwixt  three  cross  croslets  fitched 
sable,  and  in  chief  a  lymphad,  with  a  star  proper  in  the  sinister  point,  contained 
within  a  double  tressure  flowered,  and  for  crest  an  anchor  and  cable  in  tne  sea. 
Motto,  God  be  guide.  These  arms  are  yet  to  be  seen  carved  on  his  seal  of  arms, 
to  a  resignation  in  Chieen  Mary's  time,  and  on  stone,  upon  the  entry  to  the  tower 
of  Balmaclanachan,  and  several  other  places  which  are  still  standing.  The  tower 
was  the  mansion-house  of  that  family  before  the  year  15 17. 


KENNEDY  of  Glenmuck.  and  Bellimore. 


GEORGE  KENNEDY  of  Glenmuck,  &c.  obtained  a  charter,  as  second  son 
to  George  Kennedy  of  Balmaclanachan,  from  Queen  Mary  and  her  husband 
Prince  Henry,  dated  at  Dalkeith  the  31st  December  1565 ;  as  in  the  general  re- 
gister. 

George  dying  without  issue,  Oliyer  Kennedy,  his  brother,  serves  himself  heir  to 
him,  anno  1605.  (As  in  the  secretary's  register.)  And  he  dispones  the  fee  of  Bel- 
limore and  Glenmuck,  &.c.  to  his  son  George,  the  15th  of  February  1606,  and  is 
confirmed  by  a  charter  at  Edinbui-gh  the  May  thereafter.  (As  in  the  general  re- 
gister.) And  upon  the  12th  of  July  16081  he  infefts  his  wife  Isabel  Wallace  in  a 
liferent,  which  she  renounces  to  her  eldest  son  George,  upon  the  2d  of  December 
1629.  And  he  is  infeft  in  the  whole  estate  of  Bellimore,  &-c.  upon  the  15th  of 
October  1633.     (As  in  the  secretary's  register.) 

He  dying  without  children,  his  brother  John  Kennedy  succeeded,  who  married 
Elizabeth  Kennedy,  daughter  to  Doctor  Hugh  Kennedy,  son  of  Hugh  Kennedy 
of  Girvanmains ;  by  whom  he  had  William  Kennedy  of  Dangar,  who  married 
Mary  Kennedy,  daughter  to  WiUiam  Kennedy,  third  son  to  Oliver  Kennedy  of 
Bellimore,  anno  1672.  Her  mother  was  Agnes  M'Clurg,  daughter  to  John  M'Clurg 
of  Kilmores. 

Bellimore  and  his  lineal  heirs-male  carried  arms  as  the  eldest  cadet  of  Balma- 
clanachan, with  a  suitable  difference  ;  crest,  an  anchor  drawing  out  of  the  sea  by  a 
cable,  with  the  motto,  Resurgo. 


MILLAR  OF  Temple. 


IN  the  First  Part  of  this  System  of  Heraldry,  page  125  and  126,  I  gave  the  arms 
of  I'v'iilne  and  Miller,  of  those  which  occurred  to  me  at  the  time;  since  which  time 
I  have  met  with  an  account  of  a  good  old  family  of  the  surname  of  Millar  of 
Temple  and  Killoch,  in  the  sheriffdom  of  Ayr,  and  parish  of  Ochiltree,  one  of 
whom  viz.  Andrew  Millar  of  Temple,  matched  with  Anne  Stewart,  daughter  of 
Andrew  Lord  Ochiltree,  about  the  time  of  the  reformation,  by  whom  he  had  An- 
drew Millar  of  Temple,  who  married  Elizabeth  Lockhart,  daughter  to  Lockhart  of 
Bar;  she  bore  to  him  two  sons,  Mr  Andrew,  Henry,  and  a  daughter  Mary. 

Mr  Andrew  Millar,  eldest  son  of  Temple,  took  upon  him  holy  orders,  and  was 

Vol.  II.  4  R 


40  APPENDIX. 

ministei-  ut  Alloa,  and  afterwards  at  Girvan  in  Carrick ;  he  married  first  Giles, 
daughter  to  William  Hunter  of  Drumdovv,  as  appears  by  their  contract  of  mar- 
riage in  the  year  1629  :  With  her  he  had  four  sons ;  Mr  Andrew  the  eldest,  of 
whose  issue  afterwards. 

Second  son,  Mr  Robert,  Minister  of  tMb  Gospel  at  Ochiltree,  who  being  thrust 
from  his  charge,  travelled  to  Holland  and  France,  and  commenced  Doctor  of  Me- 
dicine anno  1668.  Upon  his  return,  he  was  indulged  in  his  former  charge  at 
Ochiltree,  and  married  Grissel  Cochran,  daughter  to  Colonel  Hugh  Cochran,  bro- 
thcr-german  to  the  first  Earl  of  Dundonald;  by  her  he  had  issue,  first,  Mr  William, 
Doctor  of  Medicine  ;  second,  Mr  John,  Minister  of  the  Gospel  at  Nielston,  who 
married  Janet  Adam,  daughter  to  James  Adam  of  Kirkton,  and  with  her  had  a 
daughter  named  Grissel ;  third,  Mr  Robert,  Minister  at  St  Quivox;  fourth,  Hugh, 
and  aI?o  three  daughters. 

The  above  Mr  Andrew  Millar's  third  son  was  Mr  Henry  Millar,  who  travelled 
abroad  with  his  brother  Mr  Robert  above  mentioned,  and  studied  the  Oriental 
languages,  and  other  useful  parts  of  learning  :  Returning  to  London,  he  was  help- 
ful to  Mr  Poole  in  his  writings,  and  had  a  hand  in  preparing  other  useful  books  for 
the  press :  Afterwards,  upon  account  of  his  learning,  he  was  chosen  governor  to 
several  young  English  gentlemen,  and  made  ten  times  the  grand  tour  of  Europe. 
He  died  in  London .  171 8.  Mr  Andrew's  fourth  son,  Alexander,  died  at  Glas- 
gow. 

The  said  Mr  Andrew  married  to  his  second  wife  Agnes  Spreul,  daughter  to  Mr 
Robert  Spreul,  minister  at  Dalrymple,  and  had  with  her  one  son,  Mr  Thomas,  who 
was  minister  at  Kirkliston  ;  who  married  Jean  Muir,  daughter  to  Muir  of  Thorn- 
ton, by  whom  he  had  Mr  William,  a  minister,  who  died  at  Barbadoes,  Archibald, 
a  chirurgeon  at  London,  Thomas,  who  died  young,  and  three  daughters :  the  said 
Mr  Andrew  died  at  Girvan  in  the  year  1648. 

His  eldest  son,  Mr  Andrew  Millar,  was  minister  first  at  Daillie,  in  the  presbytery 
of  Ayr,  and  afterwards  at  Neilston,  in  the  presbytery  cf  Paisley  ;  but  being  thrust 
from  his  charge  1662,  sold  the  lands  which  he  got  in  heritages,  being  descended 
of  the  eldest  son,  as  above.  He  married  Margaret  Montgomery,  sister  to  David 
^lontgomery  of  Lainshaw,  now  Lord  Lyle,  and  with  her  had  two  sons  and  three 
daughters,  Andrew,  who  died  young,  and  Mr  Pv-obert  who  succeeded  his  father, 
who  died  at  Neilston   1686. 

Which  Mr  Robert  Millar  was  ordained  minister  at  Port-Glasgow,  August  18. 
1697;  from  which  charge  he  was  transported  to  Paisley,  November  6.  1709.  He 
married  Elizabeth  Kelso,  daughter  to  Mr  John  Kelso,  eldest  son  to  Robert  Kelso 
of  Kelsoland:  with  her  he  had  fourteen  children,  of  whom  nine  are  alive;  John, 
Andrew,  Henry,  Robert,  William,  Archibald,  James,  Anne,  and  Elizabeth. 

The  said  Mr  Robert,  minister  at  Paisley,  as  now  the  representative  of  the  ancient 
family  of  Millar  of  Temple  and  Killoch,  carries  for  arms,  argent,  a  cross  moline 
.^ules,  withm  a  bordure  cheqiii  azure,  and  of  the  first,  as  descended  on  the  ma- 
ternal line  from  the  ancient  family  of  Stewart  Lord  Ochiltree;  crest,  a  dexter  hand 
holding  a  book  open,  with  the  motto,  Felicem  reddit  religio. 


CUNNINGHAM  of  Glencairk.. 


IN  the  i&th  chap,  and  page  193.  of  the  First  Volume,  I  treated  of  the  Pairle, 
showing  what  it  represented  in  armories,  according  to  the  opinion  of  the  best 
writers  of  heraldry  ;  and  I  mentioned  there,  that  such  a  figure  was  carried  with  us 
by  the  name  of  Cunningham,  and  gave  the  several  opinions  of  our  antiquaries 
and  heralds  anent  it ;  as  also  of  the  rise  of  the  surname  of  Cunningham  of  Glen- 
cairn,  with  a  short  deduction  of  the  descent  of  that  noble  family,  with  the  seve- 
ral cadets  of  the  name  descended  from  it,  and  their  blazons  from  the  Lyon  Regis- 
ter ;  whence  the  name  and  family  of  Cunningham  (whereof  the  Earls  of  Glen- 


APPENDIX.  4r 

cairn,  Lords  Cunningham  of  Kilmaurs,  and  their  progenitors,  have  ever  been  count- 
ed chiefs)  had  their  origin  and  rise,  which,  as  in  all  other  matters  of  antiquity,  i* 
obscure  and  uncertain. 

1  thought  fit  to  give  here  the  opinion  of  a  learned  and  judicious  lawyer,  anent 
the  rise  of  the  name,  anciently  wrote  Konijhrim,  being  Danish,  which  signifies, 
(according  to  Buchdimn  and  Camden)  re^iiim  dmiici/iiwi,  i.e.  king's-liome;  audit 
is  also  uncertain,  whether  that  jurisdiction,  the  bailiary  of  Cunningham,  in  the 
shire  of  Ayr  in  Scotland,  has  taken  its  designation  from  a  person  of  that  name,  or 
if  the  persons  have  taken  their  name  from  the  designation  of  these  Lmds,  which 
seems  to  be  more  probable;  in  respect  that  the  whole  tract  of  lands  comprehending 
Galloway,  Kyle,  Carrick,  and  Cunningham,  was  anciently  called,  Cbersonesus  Novan- 
tum,  about  the  year  Soo.  In  the  days  of  Kenneth  M'Alpin,,  that  tract  of  land 
was  known  under  those  several  designations  long  before  aay  surname  was  used  to 
distinguish  families,  tribes,  or  clans  in  Scotland,  except  some  patronimics,  as 
Macs ;  or  some  agnomina,  as  Bane,  Roy,  Dow,  from  colour,  or  some  other  extrin- 
sic note,  according  to  the  Irish  custom,  seeing  cognomina,  or  surnajnes,  were  only 
knovvn  in  Britain  after  the  conquest  of  England  by  the  Normans,  about  the  year 
iroD,  in  so  far  as  the  surname  of  none  of  our  kings  of  Scotland  can  be  condes- 
cended upon  before  King  Robert  the  Bruce. 

Such  surnames  as  were  used  anciently  by  the  inhabitants  of  Scotland,  were  ordi- 
narily taken  from  the  designation  of  their  lands  and  estates;  as  for  those  other  sur- 
names, not  from  lands,  they  were  brought  in  by  strangers  from  England,  France, 
or  other  countries. 

Whatever  has  been  the  iiame  of  this  old  family,  whether  ORoy  a  Cuning- 
hamo,  as  ancient  tradition  hath  delivered,  it  is  probable  the  Cunninghams  have 
taken 'their  surname  from  their  possessions;  because,  in  the  ancient  writs  of  the  fa- 
mily of  Glencairn,  the  heads  of  the  family  w'ere  designed  a  Cuninghamo  or  Ciining- 
hame. 

I.  The  first  upon  record  is,  Warnebald  Cunningham,  Predecessor  to  the  Earls  of 
Glencairn,  who  possessed  the  lands  of  Kilmaurs,  about  iioo  years  after  the  birth 
of  Christ. 

II.  Robert,  the  son  of  Warnebald,  with  the  consent  of  Richinda  Barclay,  his 
spouse,  daughter  and  heiress  to  Humphrey  Barclay  of  Garntilly,  mortifies  the 
lands  of  Gleaferchartland  to  the  abbacy  of  Arbroath  :  He  gives  also  his  village 
of  Cunningham,  tlie  kirk  of  Kilmaurs,  and  half  a  carrucate  of  land  belonging 
to  the  said  kirk,  to  the  abbacy  of  Kelso  ;  which  gift  is  confirmed  by  Richard 
Morville,  Constable  of  Scotland,  anno  1162.  Robert  is  to  be  found  likewise  a  wit- 
ness in  a  charter  granted  by  Ricliard  Morville,  of  the  lands  of  Hermiston,  to  Hen- 
ry .Sinclair. 

III.  Robert,  the  son  of  Robert,  confirms  the  grant  made  by  his  father  to  the 
abbacy  of  Kelso. 

IV.  Stephen  de  Cunningham,  is  one  of  the  fifteen  hostages  given  to  King  Hen- 
ry II.  of  England,  for  King  William's  liberation,  anm  1174. 

V.  Richard  Cunningham  is  witness  to  a  charter  granted  by  Allan,  Lord  of  Gal- 
loway, of  the  lands  of  Stevenston,  Corsbie,  and  Monoch,  to  Hugh  Crawfurd,  the 
Earl  of  Loudon's  predecessor. 

VI.  Fergus  Cunningh.\m  is  mentioned  in  the  Register  of  Paisley. 

Vn.  Hervy  Cunningham  gets  a  charter  of  the  lands  of  Kilmaurs  from  King 
Alexander  III.  after  the  battle  of  the  Largs,  anno  1264. 

VIII.  Edward,  the  son  of  Hervy,  mortifies  the  lands  of  Grange,  in  Kilmar- 
nock parish,  to  the  abbacy  of  Kilwinning. 

IX.  GiLMORE,  the  son  of  Edward,  renounces  the  league  with  France,  and  swears 
allegiance  to  the  King  of  England.  He  had  two  sons,  Robert  and  James,  who 
got  the  lands  of  Bassenden,  from  whom  the  families  of  the  Cunninghams  of  Bel- 
ton  and  Barns  are  descended. 

X.  Sir  Robert  gets  a  charter  from  King  Robert  Bruce  of  the  lands  of  Lam- 
bruchton,  anno  13 19. 

XI.  Sir  William  was  Earl  of  Carrick,  in  right  of  his  wife  Helen  Bruce,  sister 
and  heir  to  Thomas  Earl  of  Carrick. 


42  APPENDIX. 

XII.  Sir  William  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  and  heir  to  Sir  Robert  Dennis- 
ton,  and  got  with  her  a  very  great  estate.  He  had  two  sons,  Robert  and  William, 
Laird  of  Cunninghamhead. 

XIII.  Robert  gets  a  charter  of  the  lands  of  Kilmaurs  from  Robert  Duke  of 
Albany,  Governor  of  Scotland,  on  his  father  Sir  William's  resignation,  in  anm 
1413.  He  married  Janet,  daughter  to  the  Lord  Montgomery,  by  whom  he  had 
Alexander,  and  WilHam  of  Waterston. 

XIV.  Alexander  dispones  the  heritable  bailiary  of  Cunningham,  to  his  uncle 
Alexander  Lord  Montgomery,  in  anno  1454.  He  was  made  Lord  Kilmaurs  by 
King  James  II.  and  Earl  of  Glencairn  by  King  James  III.  the  28th  May  1488.  He 
married  Margaret  Hepburn,  daughter  to  Lord  Hailes,  and  sister  to  the  first  Earl  of 
Bothwell ;  and  had  issue  by  her, 

XV.  Robert,  who  married  Elizabeth  Lindsay,  daughter  to  the  Lord  Lindsay  of 
Byres,  the  Earl  of  Crawford's  predecessor. 

XVI.  CuTHBERT  married  Marion  Douglas,  daughter  to  the  Earl  of  Angus,  and 
Duke  of  Douglas's  predecessor,  and  had  a  daughter,  Marion,  married  to  the  Lord 
Lyle. 

XVII.  William,  who  married  Margaret  Campbell,  heiress  of  Stevenston,  had 
Alexander  his  successor,  and  Andrew,  Laird  of  Corshill,  Hugh,  Laird  of  Carlung, 
and  Elizabeth,  Lady  Cunninghamhead. 

XVIII.  Alexander  married  Jean  Hamilton,  daughter  to  the  Earl  of  Arran,  Duke 
of  Chatelherault,  had  William,  and  Margaret  Lady  Craigie.  His  second  wife  was 
Jean  Cunningham,  daughter  to  the  Laird  of  Caprington,  by  whom  he  had  Alexan- 
der, Laird  of  Montgreenan,  and  Jean,  married  to  the  Earl  of  Argyle,  and  after  his 
death  to  the  Laird  of  Luss. 

XIX.  William  married  Janet  Gordon,  daughter  to  the  Laird  of  Lochinvar,  pre- 
decessor to  the  Viscount  of  Kenmure,  by  whom  he  had  James,  and  John  of  Ross, 
and  four  daughters.  Jean  the  eldest,  married  to  Haldane  of  Gleneagles,  after  his 
death,  to  Kirkpatrick  of  Closeburn,  and  thirdly,  to  Fergusson  of  Craigdarroch ;  Mar- 
garet, the  second  daughter,  married  the  Laird  of  M'Lean ;  Elizabeth  the  third, 
married  first,  Auchinames ;  secondly,  Craigends :  the  fourth,  Susan,  married  Kil- 
mahew. 

XX.  James  married  Margaret  Campbell,  daughter  to  the  Laird  of  Glenorchy, 
by  whom  he  had  William,  and  John  of  Cambus-Keith,  and  six  daughters;  Jean,  the 
eldest,  contracted  to  the  Earl  of  Cassilis ;  but  he  married  another  lady,  and  she  died 
on  his  marriage  day;  second,  Catharine,  married  to  Sir  James  Cunningham  of  Glen- 
garnoch  ;  third,  Margaret,  to  the  Lord  Evandale,  and  after  his  death  to  the  Laird 
of  Calderwood  ;  fourth,  Anne,  to  the  Marquis  of  Hamilton ;  fifth,  Susan,  to  the 
Laird  of  Hatton  ;  and  sixth,  Margaret,  to  Kilbirnie. 

XXI.  William  married  Janet  Ker,  daughter  to  the  Earl  of  Lothian,  by  whom 
he  had  William,  and  Colonel  Robert,  and  five  daughters  ;  Margaret,  married  to 
Stewart  of  Minto ;  Elizabeth  to  Beaton  of  Creigh,  afterwards  to  Chisliolmof  Crom- 
licks;  Jean,  to  the  Laird  of  Blair;  Anne,  never  married  ;  Marion,  married  to  the 
Earl  of  Findlater,  and  after  his  death  to  Eraser  of  Philorth,  predecessor  to  the  Lord 
Salton. 

XXII.  William,  Lord  Chancellor  of  Scotland,  married  Anne  Ogilvie,  daughter 
to  the  Earl  of  Findlater,  had  William  Lord  Kilmaurs,  who  died  unmarried;  and 
James  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  to  the  Duke  of  Hamilton  ;  he  died  Lord  Kil- 
maurs, v>'ithout  children  ;  Alexander  and  John  successive  earls :  the  daughters 
were  Jean,  married  to  the  Earl  of  Kilmarnock,  Mary  to  Lord  Bargeny,  Elizabeth 
to  the  Laird  of  Orbiston,  and  Anne  died  unmarried. 

XXIII.  Earl  Alexander  married  Nicolas  Stewart,  daughter  to  the  Laird  of 
Kirkhil],  a  Lord  of  the  Session,  and  had  by  her  Margaret  Countess  of  Lauder- 
dale. 

XXIV.  Earl  John  married  Mary  Erskine,  daughter  to  the  Earl  of  Marr,  and  had 
by  her 

XXV.  William  married  to  Henrietta  Stewart,  daughter  to  the  Earl  of  Gallo- 
way, and  had  issue,  William  Lord  Kilmaurs,  John,  Alexander,  and  James ;  Mar- 
garet, Henrietta,  Mary,  and  Catherine.  The  achievement  of  the  family  is  argent^ 
a  shake-fork  sahle,  supporters,  two  conies,  proper  ;  crest,  an  unicorn's  head  argent. 


APPENDIX.  43 

maned  and  horned  or  ;  and,  for  motto,  Over  fork  over  ;  which  see  in  Plate  of 
Achievements. 

The  cadets  of  this  family  are  Cunningham  of  Glengarnock,  the  first  descended 
from  Ga/fred  de  Cuninghamc,  witness  to  King  Malcolm  IV.  his  charter  of  founda- 
tion to  the  abbacy  of  Bal merino. 

Gilbert  de  Coningsburg,  who  was  one  of  the  arbitrators  in  the  controversy  at  Ber- 
wick betwiKt  Bruce  and  Baliol  for  the  crown.  He  renounced  the  league  with 
France,  and  swore  allegiance  to  Edward  of  England,  as  also  his  son  Donald  did. 
The  cadets  of  his  family  are  Skuloch,  Drumquhiile,  Achtarmarhar,  Caddel,  Quar- 
relton,  Bellearhim,  Newton,  &-c. 

The  Marquiss  of  Congie  and  Count  Cunningham,  in  France,  are  of  Glen- 
cairn. 

The  Lairds  of  Polquhairn,  Bonnington,  Auchenharvy,  Polmaise,  Caprington.Cun- 
ninghamhead,  Waterston,  Craigends,  Corshill,  Carlung,  Mountgreenand,  Ross,  and 
Cambuskeith,  are  from  Glencairn. 

Ramfurly  is  from  Fergus  Cunningham,  mentioned  in  the  Register  of  Paisley, 
and  the  next  cadet  to  Glengarnock. 

Bassenden,  Belton,  and  Barns  next  to  him. 

Aikat  is  of  Belton. 

Miln-Craig  from  Polquhairn. 

Buquhan  from  Auchenharvy. 

Legland,  Lochermiss  CoUenen,  Dalkeith,  from  Caprington.. 

Killybeggs  in  Ireland,  and  Tourlands  from  Cunninghamhead. 

Robertland,  Caivncuren,  Baidland,  Auchenyards  from  Craigends. 

Clunbath  and  Hill  from  Aikat. 

Enterkin  and  the  present  Caprington  from  Legland. 

Suads  from  Glencairn,  Birkshaw  from  Suads. 

Kirkland,  South-hook,  Auchinsheith  from  Robertland. 

For  the  arms  of  many  of  these  cadets  I  have  blazoned  in  the  First  Volume^. 
page  192. 


MACKINTOSH  of  i-hat  Ilk,  Captain  of  Clan-Chattan. 


IN  the»First  Volume  of  this  Treatise,  page  277,  I  gave  a  brief  account  of  the 
origin  of  this  family,  with  a  blazon  of  their  armorial  bearings,  and  what  at  that 
time  I  knew  concerning  it ;  but  since  the  publishing  of  it  I  have  got  a  full  ac- 
count of  the  family  sent  me  by  the  present  Laird  of  Mackintosh,  which  is  as  fol- 
lows. 

I.  The  first  of  the  family  was  one  Shaw,  second  son  to  Duncan,  the  second  of 
that  name.  Earl  of  Fife,  who  accompanied  King  Malcolm  IV.  in  his  expedition 
for  suppressing  the  rebels  in  Murray,  in  the  year  1 163  ;  and  for  his  good  services 
was  rewarded  with  many  lands  in  the  north,  and  made  Constable  of  the  castle  of 
Inverness.  He  was  commonly  called  Mackintosbich  vie  Duifh  ;  that  is  to  say. 
Thane  Macdufl:"'s  son  ;  from  which  the  name  Macintosh  became  a  surname  to 
his  posterity.  He  married  Giles  Montgomery,  daughter  to  Hugh  Montgomery, 
a  favourite  of  the  king,  by  whom  he  had  three  sons,  Shaw,  Malcolm,  and  Dun- 
can.    He  died  in  the  year  1179. 

U.  Shaw,  his  eldest  son,  succeeded  his  father,  married  Mary  Sandilands,  daughter 
to  Sir  Harry  Sandilands  of  that  Ilk,  and  had  with  her  four  sons,  Malcolm,  Far- 
quhar,  William  and  Edward.  In  the  reign  of  King  WiUiam  he  defended  the 
castle  of  Inverness  against  Donald  of  the  Isles ;  and  for  his  fidelity  and  bravery 
sWas  made  chamberlain  of  all  the  king's  revenue  in  the  north.  His  eldest  son 
Malcolm  dying  brfore  himself  without  issue,  he  was  succeeded  by  his  second 
son. 

Vol.  II.  4  S 


44  APPENDIX. 

III.  Farquhard,  who  married  Sarah  Macduff,  daughter  to  Malcolm  (the  fourth  of 
that  name)  Earl  of  Fife  :  He  was  succeeded  (having  no  issue)  by 

IV.  Shaw  his  brother,  William's  son,  who  married  Helena  Calder,  daughter  to  the 
Thane  of  Calder  ;  and  by  her  had  five  sons,  Farquhard,  Duncan,  Alexander,  Shaw 
oig,  and  Malcolm. 

V.  Farquhard  succeeded  his  father,  and  married  Mora  Macdonald,  daughter 
to  Angus  oig  Macdonald  of  the  Isles,  by  whom  he  had  but  one  son  called 
Angus. 

VI.  This  Angus,  sixth  Laird  of  Macintosh,  in  the  year  129 1  married  Eva,  the 
only  daughter  and  heiress  of  Giilipatrick  Macdougald  mc  Gillichattan,  Captain 
of  Clan-Chattan,  and  with  her  got  the  lands  of  Glenluy  and  Locharkaik  in 
Lochaber,  with  the  command  and  chieftainry  of  the  whole  Clan-Chattan  :  And 
accordingly,  from  that  time  forward,  for  the  space  of  three  hundred  years  and  up- 
ward, his  successors,  lairds  of  Macintosh,  were  designed  by  their  stiles,  Captains  of 
Clan-Chattan  ;  and  were,  for  near  four  hundred  years,  owned,  acknowledged,  and 
submitted  to,  (as  their  rightful  and  undoubted  chief)  by  all  the  branches  and 
cadets  of  the   said  clan,  as  they  are  by  them  all  at  this  day. 

That  they  have  been  designed  Captains  of  Clan-Chattan  is  evident  from  the 
charters  and  records  of  the  family  ;  some  of  which  were  sent  me  :  I  shall  here  men- 
tion them  with  other  principal  ones,  being  in  the  custody  of  the  chief  of  the 
family,  which  they  could  not  adventure  to  transmit  so  long  and  dangerous  a  way. 
1  took  their  relation  for  truth,  for  the  honour  of  the  family  would  not  impose  upon 
the  public  and  me  for  all  the  matter. 

VII.  WiLLi.MM,  the  seventh  Laird  of  Macintosh,  succeeded  his  father  Angus, 
and  was  tlie  first  of  that  surname  that  was  designed  Captain  of  Clan-Chattan,  as 
by  a  charter  granted  by  the  Lord  of  the  Isles,  of  the  lands  of  Glenluy  and  Loch- 
arkaik, to  the  said  William  Macintosh  anno  1337,  and  a  confirmation  of  the  same 
right  from  King  David  Bruce,  dated  at  Scone,  the  last  day  of  February,  the  29th 
year  of  his  reign,  anno  1359,  in  the  which  he  is  designed  Gulielmus  Macintosh,  Capi- 
lanius  de  Clan-Chattan :  He  was  the  first  of  the  family  that  added  a  galley  or  lym- 
phad,  for  the  Clan-Chattan,  to  his  paternal  arms,  the  lion  rampant,  and  a  dexter 
hand.  He  married  first  Florence  Calder,  daughter  to  the  Thane  of  Calder,  by 
whom  he  had  a  son  called  Lachlan,  and  one  daughter.  After  his  first  wife's  death  he 
married  Margaret  Macleod,  daughter  to  Rory-more  Macleod  of  the  Lewis,  by 
whom  he  had  a  son,  Malcolm,  that  afterwards  came  to  the  estate  and  chief- 
tainry. 

Vill.  Lachlan  succeeded  his  father  in  his  estate  and  chieftainry.  He  married- 
Agnes  Eraser,  daughter  to  the  Lord  Lovat,  by  whom  he  had  a  son  called  Farqu- 
hard :  It  was  in  this  laird's  time  that  the  famous  engagement  in  the  Inch  of  Perth, 
recorded  by  all  our  historians,  was  fought  betwixt  the  Clan-Chattan  and  the  Clan- 
Kay ;  tlie  former  being  commanded  in  that  action  by  one  Shaw  Macintosh,  cousin- 
german  to  the  then  laird. 

IX.  Farol'hard  succeeds  his  father  Lachlan  :  But  being  an  inactive  and  indo- 
lent man,  and  thereby  unfit  to  command  an  active  and  stubborn  people,  resigned 
the  estate  and  chieftainry  to  his  uncle  Malcolm. 

X.  Which  Malcolm,  the  tenth  Laird  of  Macintosh,  married  Mora  Macdonald, 
daughter  to.  Ronald  Macdonald,  Laird  of  Moydart,  and  was  one  of  the  principal 
commanders  of  Donald  of  the  Isles'  army  at  the  battle  of  Harlaw,  in  the  year 
1411,  as  Boethius  records,  where  he  commanded  the  Clan-Chattan,  under  which 
name  are  comprehended  the  Macphersons,  Shaws,  Farquharsons,  Macgilvrays, 
?vlacqueens,  Macbeans,  Macphails,  Davidsons,  alias  Clanduy,  Clarks,  alias  Clan- 
chlerich,  Tarrals,  &c.  For  his  service  in  this  action  he  got  the  lands  in  Brae- 
lochaber,  with  the  heritable  baihary  and  stewartry  of  that  whole  lordship,  which 
the  Clan-Chattan  never  had  before  his  time,  notwithstanding  what  is  storied  in 
the  second  volume  of  Mr  Collier's  Genealogical  and  Historical  Dictionary.  This 
Malcolm  was  made  Governor  of  the  castle  of  Inverness,  by  King  James  I.  in  the 
year  1429  :  By  his  majesty's  desire  he  ordered  the  Clan-Chattan  (whom  Alex- 
ander Lord  of  the  Isles  had  seduced  to  his  party)  to  desert  and  join  the  king's 
army,  which  accordingly  they  did,  upon  which  Alexander's  army  dispersed;  as  ia 
John  Major's  History,. book  6.  chap.  12. 


APPENDIX.  45 

Xf.  Duncan  Macintosh  succeeded  his  father  Malcolm.  He  got  a  charter  of 
the  lands  of  Braelochaber,  in  the  year  1466,  from  John  Earl  of  Ross,  and  chief  of 
all  the  Macdonalds :  In  which  charter  he  is  designed  Duncanus  Macintosh,  consan- 
guineus  noster,  Citpitanius  de  Clan-Cbattan.  There  is  a  charter  of  confirmation,  and 
a  sasine  given  (upon  the  said  lands  of  Braelochaber)  to  the  said  Duncan,  by  King 
James  III.  dated  the  fourth  d^iy  of  July  147(1,  wherein  he  is  designed  Dilectus 
mster  Duncanus  Macintosh  Cipitanius  de  Clan-Chattan.  He  married  Florence  Mac- 
donald,  daughter  to  tlie  Earl  of  Ross,  and  load  by  her  several  children. 

XII.  Farquhard,  who  succeeded  him,  had  to  wife  Giles  Eraser,  daughter  to  the 
Lord  Lovat,  by  whom  he  had  but  one  son  who  died  young :  He  was  succeeded  by 
his  cousin-german 

XIII.  William  Macintosh,  who  married  Isabel  M'Niven,  heiress  of  the- 
barony  of  Dunaughton,  by  whoni  he  had  no  issue.  He  was  succeeded  by  his 
brother 

XIV.  Lachlan  Macintosh,  who  in  the  year  1520  married  Jean  Gordon,  only- 
daughter  and  heir  of  line  to  the  Laird  of  Lochinvar,  afterwards  Viscount  of  Ken- 
mure,  for  which  the  fomily  has  since  been  in  use  to  marshal  the  arms  of  Lochin- 
var with  their  own  :  With  her  he  had  but  one  son,  William,  and  two  daugh- 
ters. 

XV.  William  succeeds  his  father,  gets  a  charter  from  Q^ieen  Mary,  dated  the- 
19th  July  1545,  of  the  lands  of  Braelochaber,  in  which  he  is  designed  Capitanius 
de  Clan-Chattan,  and  a  commission  from  George  Earl  of  Huntly,  Lieutenant-Gen- 
eral  of  the  North  of  Scotland,  as  his  deputy,  dated  at  Inverness  the  penult  day  of 
October  1544,  in  which  he  is  designed  William  Macintosh  of  Dunaughton,  Cap- 
tain of  Clan-Chattan  :  He  married  Margaret  Ogilvie,  daughter  to  the  Laird  of 
Findlater,  who  bore  to  him  two  sons  and  one  daughter.     The  eldest  son 

XVI.  Lachlan  succeeded  his  father,  married  Agnes,  daughter  to  Kenneth  Mac- 
kenzie of  Kintail,  by  whom  he  had  seven  sons  and  six  daughters  :  His  eldest  son, 
Angus,  married  Lady  Jean  Campbell,  daughter  to  Archibald  Earl  of  Argyle,  by 
whom  he  h-ad  two  sons  and  one  daughter  :  He  died  before  his  father,  who  was 
succeeded  by  his  grandchild 

XVII.  Lachlan,  son  of  Angus,  who  manied  Agnes  Grant,  eldest  daughter  to 
the  Laird  of  Grant.  He  got  a  letter  from  King  Charles  II.  dated  at  Perth,  the 
24th  December  1650,  directed  thus :  To  our  Right  Trusty  and  Well-Beloved  the 
Laird  of  Macintosh,  and  the  Gentlemen  of  his  kin  of  Clan-Chattan.  Besides  these 
documents  already  adduced  for  proving  the  Lairds  of  Macintosh  their  title  to  be 
captains  of  Clan-Chattan,  there  are  to  be  seen  among  Macintosh's  papers  several 
obligations  of  mutual  friendship  betwixt  the  lairds  of  his  family  and  several  noble  -. 
men  and  gentlemen,  as  the  Earl  cf  Huntly,  the  Earl  of  Argyle,  the  Earl  of  Athol, 
the  Earl  of  Murray,  Lord  Forbes,  Sir  Donald  Macdonald  of  Slate,  the  Laird  of 
Macleod,  the  Laird  of  Kilravock,  the  Laird  of  Foulis,  the  Laird  of  Calder :  In 
every  one  of  v.'hich  obligations  Macintosh  is  designed  Captain  of  Clan-Chattan : 
All  our  historians  design  them  after  the  same  manner ;  as  Lesley  in  his  ninth  book 
De  Gestis  Scotorum,  writing  of  the  Clan-Chattan,  says,  Tribus  Clunchattana  vulgo 
nuncuputa,  Macintoshinna  principe  Macintoshio  :    And   in   his   loth   book  he  calls 

,  William  Macintosh  Clancbattanice  tribus  ducem  ;  Hollinshed  calls  the  sanie  Wil- 
liam, head  and  chief  of  the  Clan-Chattan  ;  and  Buchanan  calls  him  Magna  inter 
priscos  Scotos  familice  priiicipeni;  and  in  his  i6th  book  Cattance  familice  principem: 
And  Sir  George  Mackenzie,  in  the  67th  page  of  his  Heraldry,  speaking  of  Mac- 
intosh's arms,  calls  him  chief  of  tlie  Clan-Chattan.  There  are  also  several  bonds 
of  man-rent,  (in  the  custody  of  the  Laird  of  Macintosh)  given  by  the  heads  of  the 
several  branches  of  that  clan  to  his  predecessors;  the  first  is  granted  by  the  Mac- 
phersons,  as  well  as  otiiers  of  the  Clan-Chattan,  to  the  Laird  of  Macintosh,  in 
which  they  acknowledge  Macintosh  the  principal  captain  of  the  haill  kin  of  Clan- 
Chattan,  and  obhge  themselves  to  concur  with,  maintain,  and  defend  him,  against 
■whomsoever  shall  happen  to  oppose  him.  This  bond  is  dated  the  2Sth  February 
1396.  There  is  a  second  bond,  dated  the  4th  of  April  1609,  ot  the  same  nature, 
granted  by  the  said  Macphersons,  and  all  the  other  branches  of  the  Clan-Chattan, 
in  which  they  give  the  laird  of  Macintosh  the  designation  of  Principal  Captain  of 
the  haill  kin  of  Clan-Chattan,  according  to  the  king's  gift  of  chieftainry  of  tlic 


46  APPENDIX. 

whole  Clan-Chattan.  The  third  bond  of  the  same  nature  is  of  the  date  the  tpth 
November  1664,  subscribed  by  Andrew  Macpherson  of  Ciunie,  Ldchlan  Macplier- 
son  of  Pitmean,  John  Macpherson  of  Inneressie,  and  several  others ;  in  which 
bond  Lachlan  Macintosh  of  Torcastle  is  designed  our  chief.  There  is  likewise  a 
declaration  from  the  Lord  Lyon,  in  the  year  1672,  in  favour  of  the  Laird  of 
Macintosh,  which  is  as  follows  ;  "  I  Sir  Charles  Areskine  of  Cambo,  Knight  Ba- 
"  ronet,  Lord  Lyon  King  at  Arms,  having  perused  and  seen  sufficient  evidents  and 
"  testimonies  from  our  histories,  my  own  register,  and  bonds  of  man-rent,  do 
"  hereby  declare.  That  I  find  the  Laird  of  Macintosh  to  be  the  only  undoubted 
"  chief  of  the  name  of  Macintosh,  and  of  the  Clan-Chattan,  comprehending  the 
"  Macphersons,  Macgilvrays,  Farquharsons,  Macqueens,  Macphails,  Macbanes, 
"  and  others  :  And  that  I  have  given,  and  will  give,  none  of  these  families  any 
"  arms,  but  as  cadets  of  Macintoshe's  family,  whose  predecessor  married  the  heri- 
"  trix  of  Clan-Chattan  in  anno  1291;  and,  in  particular,  I  declare.  That  1  have 
"  given  Duncan  Macpherson  of  Ciunie  a  coat  of  arms  as  cadet  of  the  said  family. 
"  And  that  tlfis  may  remain  to  posterity,  and  may  be  known  to  all  concerned. 
"  whether  of  the  said  name  or  others,  1  have  subscribed  thir  presents  at  Edin- 
"  burgh,  the  loth  day  of  November  1672."  And  in  full  demonstration  of  what 
has  been  already  adduced,  for  proving  the  lairds  of  Macintosh  the  only  undoubted 
chieftains  of  Clan-Chattan,  ever  since  their  marrying  the  heiress  of  the  said  clan, 
the  present  Lachlan  Macpherson  of  Ciunie,  with  the  special  advice  and  consent  of 
his  friends  of  the  name  of  Macpherson,  (who  were  the  only  branch  of  the  Clan- 
Chattan  that  did  at  any  time  desert  the  laird  of  Macintosh,  or  disown  his  un- 
doubted right  to  the  chieftainry)  do,  for  himself,  his  heirs,  and  succeseors,  not  only 
own  and  acknowledge  the  Laird  of  Macintosh  as  his  and  their  undoubted  chief, 
but  likewise  disclaim  and  utterly  renounce  whatever  has  been  (at  any  time  past) 
wrote,  said,  or  done,  to  the  contrary  ;  as  is  to  be  seen  in  a  writ  to  that  purpose. 
This  Lachlan,  the  seventeenth  Laird  of  Macintosh,  had  issue  by  his  above-named 
lady,  three  sons  and  one  daughter.  He  was  knighted  by  King  James  VI. 
and  made  Gentleman  of  the  Bed-chamber  to  the  Prince,  and  was  succeeded  by 
his  son 

XVIII.  William  Laird  of  Macintosh,  who  married  Margaret  Graham,  daughter 
to  the  Laird  of  Fintray,  by  whom  he  had  two  sons,  Lachlan  and  William,  and  two 
daughters,  EHxabeth  and  Jean. 

XIX.  Lachl.\n  succeeded  his  father,  and  married  Magdalen  Lindsay,  only 
daughter  to  the  Laird  of  EdgehiH,  mother  to  the  present  laird ;  and  after  her 
death  he  married  -\nna  Monro,  daughter  to  Sir  George  Monro,  and  rehct  of  the 
Lord  Reay. 

XX.  Lachlan,  the  present  Laird  of  Macintosh,  succeeded  his  fatlier,  and 
married  Anna  Duff,  daughter  to  the  Laird  of  Druramuir,  the  28th  April 
1702- 

The  achievement  of  the  family  of  Macintosh  is,  quarterly,  first  quarter  or,  a 
lion  r^ipant  gules,  armed  and  langued  azure,  the  paternal  bearing  as  descended  of 
Macduff  Earl  of  Fife ;  second  argent,  a  dexter  hand  couped  fesse-ways,  grasping  a 
man's  heart  pale-ways,  gules,  for  a  notable  action  for  the  king  and  country  ;  third 
nzure,  a  boar's  head  couped  or,  for  Gordon  of  Lochinvar ;  fourth  or,  a  lymphad, 
her  oars  in  saltier  sable,  for  marrying  the  heiress  of  Clan-Chattan  :  Which  shield 
of  arms  is  adorned  with  helmet  and  mantling  gides,  doubled  argent,  and  on 
a  wreath  of  his  tinctures  is  set,  for  crest,  a  cat  seiant,  proper,  and,  for  suppor- 
ters, two  cats  of  the  same;  with  the  motto.  Touch  not  the  cat  but  a  glove. 


.SCRYMGEOURS  of  Dudop. 


IN  the  First  Volume  of  this  System,  page  286,  I  gave  a  short  accout  of  the  rise 
of  the  name  of  Scrymckour,  and  of  the  family  with  their  armorial  bearings :  But  I, 


APPENDIX,  47 

not  being  well  informed,  said,  That  the  tainily  was  now  extinct  ;  whereas,  by 
better  mtbrmation,  the  heir-male  of  tailzie,  as  also  of  line,  viz.  Dr  Alexander 
Scrynigeour,  Professor  of  Divinity  in  the  University  of  St  Andrews,  with  several 
others  of  the  family,  are  extant,  and  have  their  arms  matriculated  in  the  Lyon  Re- 
gister, which  1  have  given  in  the  above-cited  place. 

As  to  the  rise  of  this  ancient  and  honourable  name,  (wJiich  the  English  spell 
Scrimzcour,  and.  iomti  tarailies  in  Scotland  Scrimseour')  our  historians  agree  that 
it  was  upon  occasion  of  a  signal  service  done  the  king  by  Sir  Alexander  Carron, 
whose  name  was  therefore  changed  into  Scrymgeour,  ;'.  e.  a  sharp  tighter,  and  is 
the  first  knight  we  read  of  in  our  history. 

Buchanan  places  it  in  the  reign  oi'iVIalcolra  III.  in  these  words :  "  Hostium  ibj 
"  (ad  Spceam)  tantum  numerum,  quantum  ex  ilhs  regionibus  cogi  posse  nunquam 
"  credidisset,  in  ulteriore  ripa,  ad  transitum  prohibendum,  stare  conspicatus  (Rex 
"  Milcolumbus  Tertius)  signifero  cunctante  flumen  ingredi,  signum  ei  ablatum, 
"  Alexandro  Carroiu,  equiti  m^tae  fortituduiis  dedit  ;  posterisque  ejus  is  honos 
"  habitus  est,  ut  regium  in  bello  vexiljum  ferrent,  ei  pro  Carrone,  postea  nomen 
"  Scryniigero  positum  ;  quod  magistrum  tractandorum  armorum,  multum  sibi 
"  ex  eo  studio  arrogantera,  ipse  vera,  viitute  fretus,  artisque  ejus  penitus  imperitus 
"  vicisset." 

Others,  viz.  Dr  Abercroraby  and  Cra^'furd  place  this  action  in  Alexander  I.  his 
time,  anno  1 107,  thus,  There  baying  been  a  plot  discovered  against  King  Alexan- 
der I.  his  life,  the  rebels  betook  themselves  to  llight,  and  were  pursued  by  the  king 
and  a  part  of  his  friends  the  length  of  the  Water  of  Spey  :  the  rebels  had  passed 
and  swimmed  the  water  before  the  king  and  his  party  came  up  ;  upon  which  the 
king's  small  army  made  a  stand,  being  afraid  of  the  water,  which  had  by  this  time 
run  over  all  its  banks ;  whereupon  Sir  Alexander  Carron,  a  brave  and  valiant  knight, 
took  the  standard,  and  gave  encouragement  to  the  rest  to  follow  :  Wherefore  he 
had  his  name  changed,  and  a  special  grant  from  the  king  to  himself,  and  the  heirs- 
male  of  his  body,  to  be  hereditary  stPJidard-bearers  to  the  kings  of  Scotland,  and' 
gave  him  for  his  coat  of  arms  a  part  of  the  royal  bearing,  as  I  mentioned,  ^iz. 
filler,  a  lion  rampant  or,  armed  and  langued  azure,  with  a  sword  in  his  dexter  paw, 
proper,  hiked  and  pommelled  of  the  second  ;  and  the  family,  to  perpetuate  the 
action,  have  used  the  motto,  Dissipate.  Mr  Johnston,  the  poet,  has  left  us  the- 
following  verses  to  the  honour  of  bis  memory,  by  which  this  action  is  very  well 
represented. 

^uM  ttepidas '  Da  signa  mihi,  superabimus  amnem, 

Terreat  an  pavldos  nos  ftigitira  cohors  ? 

Di.xit  &  arreptis  signis,  ruit  acer  in  hostem. 

Nil  rapidi  metuens  agmina  torva  vadi  ; 

Hinc  decus  augusto  surgit  sub  principe,  ab  armis- 

Scrymigerae  gcnti,  fama  decusque  manent. 

Arma  alius  jactet,.nos  scimus fortibus  annit. 

Utier  haud  dici,  raalumus  esse  virL 

Buchanan,  accounting  for  this  action,  says,  "  Verum  rex  a  suis  retentus,  Alex- 
"  andro  Carroni,  Alexandri  cujus  supra  merainimus,  iilio  partem  exercitus  dedit ; 
"  qui,  subito  cum  suis  amnem  ingressus  audaciee  miraculo  adeo  conterruit  hostes, 
"  ut  passim  in  fugam  statim  se  conjicerent." 

This  name  hath  been  remarkable  in  our  Scots  History  on  several  other  occasions; 
particularly  Sir  Alexander  Scrymgeour  was  among  the  first  that  took  the  field  for 
King  Robert  Bruce,  and  faithfully  adhered  to  him ;  in  consideration  whereof, 
when  that  valiant  prince  came  to  be  established  on  the  throne,  he  gave  him  sun- 
dry lands  about  the  burgh  of  Inverkeithing :  also  Sir  John  Scrymgeour  was  killed 
at  the  fatal  battle  of  Duplin,  1132.  And  another.  Sir  James  Scrymgeour,  Constable 
of  Dundee,  his  successor,  was  slain  in  the  governor's  ai-my,  against  Donald  Lord  of 
the  Isles,  at  the  battle  of  Harlaw,  141 1. 

This  family  has  matched  with  several  of  the  most  noble  familes  of  this  kingdom, 
as  Gray,  Southesk,  Roxburgh,  and  Dalhousie  ;  and  having  flourished  long  in  the 
state  of  barons,  came  to  the  honour  of  peerage  in  the  person  of  Sir  John  Scrym- 
geour, Constable  of  Dundee,  who  was  raised  to  the  honour  of  Viscount  of  Dudhope 

Vol.  II.  4  T 


4a  APPENDIX. 

and  Lord  Scryingeour,  by  King  Charles  I.  anno  1641,  and  his  son  was  made  Earl' 
of  Dundee  in  the  year  166 1.  Upon  the  breaking  out  of  the  civil  war,  he  accept- 
ed of  a  command  in  those  forces  that  were  sent  from  Scotland  to  the  aid  of  the 
English  parliament  against  the  king,  and  lost  his  life  in  the  battle  of  Marston- 
miiir,  on  the  second  of  September  1644.  "  A  person,  says  one,  who  for  the 
"  nobleness  of  his  extraction,  and  many  personal  endowments,  deserved  a  better 
"  fate." 

This  viscount  kft  a  son  John,  by  his  lady,  daughter  to  Robert  first  Earl  of  Rox- 
burgh, who  succeeded  him  in  his  estate  and  honours,  and  put  himself  in  arms  in 
behalf  of  King  Charles  II.  and  marched  with  him  to  the  battle  of  Worcester 
third  September  1651,  after  which  he  suftered  much  for  his  loyalty  :  but.  living  to 
see  the  Restoration,  he  received  some  part  of  amends,  being  created  Earl  of  Dun- 
dee 1661.  His  lady  was  Anne,  daughter  of  William  first  Earl  of  Dalhousie  :  but 
on  the  twenty-third  of  June  1668  he  died  without  issue. 

Upon  this  earl's  demise,  the  whole  estates  and  offices  should  have  descended  to 
John  Scrymgeour,  then  of  Kirkton,  having  been  tailzied  to  his  grandlather  John 
Scrymgeour  of  Kirkton,  and  the  heirs-male  of  his  body,  by  a  charter  of  tailzie 
under  the  Great  Seal,  upon  a  resignation  made  personally  by  James  Scrymgeour  of 
Dudhope,  Constable  of  Dundee,  into  King  James  IV.  his  hands,  for  that  effect,  dated 
at  Holyroodhouse,  the  25th  of  November  1587,  in  these  words,  "  Jacobus  Dei  gra- 
"  tia  Rex  Scotorum,  omnibus  probis  hominibus,  &-c.  sciatis  nos,  post  nostram  per- 
"  tectam  ^tatem  viginti  unius  annorum  completam,  et  generalem  revocationem 
"  factam,  dedisse,  concessisse,  et  hac  prsesenti  charta  nostra  confirmasse  dilecto  nos- 
"  tro  Jacobo  Scrymgeour  de  Dudop,  Constabulario,  ad  nunc  prreposito  burgi  nostri 
"  de  Dundee,  suisque  hseredibus  masculis  de  corpore  suo  legitime  procreatis  seu 
"  procreandis ;  quibus  deficientibus,  Jacobo  Scrymgeour,  filio  legitimo  quondam 
»*  Jacobi  Scrymgeour,  qui  patronus  (or  rather  patruus)  erat  dicti  Jacobi  Scrym- 
"  geour  de  Dudop,  suisque  ha-redibus  masculis  de  corpore  suo  legitime  procreandis; 
"  quibus  deficientibus,  Joanni  Scrymgeour  de  Kirkton,  et  hieredibus  masculis  de  cor- 
"  pore  suo  legitime  procreandis :"  and  so  on  to  several  other  families,  as  is  more 
fully  contained  in  the  said  charter  of  tailzie,  an  extract  whereof,  signed  by  Sir 
Archibald  Primrose,  Clerk-Register,  is  in  the  hands  of  Dr  Alexander  Scrymgeour, 
Professor  of  Divinity  in  St  Andrews,  and  only  son  to  the  foresaid  John  Scrymgeour 
of  Kirkton. 

John  SciiYMGEOUR  of  Kirkton,  to  whom  this  tailzie  was  made,  anno  .1587,  mar- 
ried Marlon  Fotheringhanie,  daughter  to  Mr  James  Fotherlngham,  son  to  the 
Laird  of  Powrie,  and  Margaret  Lindsay,  daughter  to  John  Lord  Lindsay,  and  Helen 
Stewart,  daughter  to  John,  the  second  Earl  of  Athol,  by  whom  he  had  four  sons, 
James,  John,  Mr  Gilbert,  and  William,  and  three  daughters,  Magdalen,  Margaret,, 
and  Janet.  James  dying  without  male  issue,  his  brother  John  succeeded  him, 
and  married  Jean  M'Gill,  eldest  daughter  to  James  M'Gill  of  Rankeillor,  and  Anna. 
Clephrm,  by  whom  he  had  three  sons,  John,  Alexander,  and  Mr  James,  and  three 
daughters,  Marion,  Anna,  and  Margaret. 

John  dying  anno  1656,  to  him  succeeded  bis  son  John,  and  married  Magdalen 
Wedderburn,  daughter  to  Alexander  Wedderbarn  of  Kingennie,  and  Elizabeth 
Ramsay,  by  whom  he  left  on  life  only  one  son,  Dr  Alexander,  fonnerly  mention- 
and  one  daughter,  Jean.  Alexander,  John's  brother,  has  no  lawful  issue:  Mr  James 
was  minister  of  the  Gospel  at  Currle,  and  married  Elizabeth  Chisholm,  hy 
whom  there  remains  only  one  son,  Mr  Henry  Scrymgeour  of  Wester-Lochgelly, 
Wrker  to  the  Signet,  and  one  daughter  Henrietta. 

Though  it  be  thus  plainly  evident,  that  there  was  no  just  ground  to.  pretend, 
that  upon  the  Earl  of  Dundee's  death,  the  estate,  £tc.  fell  in  the  king's  hands  as' 
y'tinms  hivres,  yet  the  Duke  of  Lauderdale  had  the  interest  with  King  Charles  IL 
to  procure  a  gift  of  nitimus  bares  in  favour  of  his  brother  Hatton;  and  (that  prov- 
ing insufficient  to  answ'er  his  designs)  thereafter  a  gift  of  recogrrition,  in  opposition 
to  all  the  ties  of  friendship  and  gratitude  a  prince  could  be  under  to  his  subject; 
for  the  Earl  of  Dundee  had  not  only  faithfully  served  King  Charles  II.  and  suffer- 
ed much  for  him,  but  also  to  serve  him  the  more  effectually,  had  brought  his 
estate  under  thwe  burdens  upon  which  the  recognition  was  founded.     A  most  per- 


APPENDIX.  49 

jiicious  advice  to  a  prince  to  forget  his  friend,  and  ruin  his  family  in  favour  of  a 
stranger. 

For  this  recognition  not  only  precluded  Kirkton  from  his  just  claim  to  the  estate, 
but  also  deprived  him  and  many  other  innocent  creditors  of  their  just  and  lawful 
debts,  which,  with  the  misfortune  of  having  bought  the  countess's  liferent,  she 
dying  soon  after,  so  distressed  Kirkton's  affairs,  that  he  was  forced  to  sell  his  estate 
for  the  satisfaction  of  his  creditors  ;  particularly  the  land&  of  Kirkton  were  then 
sold  to  John  Scrymgeour,  merchant  in  Dundee,  whose  heir  retains  the  possession  of 
them  to  this  day. 

Moreover  the  above-designed  Dr  Scrymgeour  is  not  only  heir  of  tailzie  to  the 
Earl  of  Dundee,  but  is  also  heir  of  line  to  the  original  family  of  Dudhope,  to  which 
the  earl's  predecessor,  the  Laird  of  Glastre,  succeeded  as  heir  of  tailzie,  anno  1546: 
For,  about  the  year  1525,  James  Scrymgeour,  Constable,  having  no  sons,  only  two 
daughters,  Elizabeth  and  An.ne,  by  his  lady  Mariot  Stewart,  James  Scrymgeour  of 
Kirkton  married  Elizabeth,  and  by  her  had  five  sons,  John,  James,  William,  Tho- 
mas, and  Alexander.  Upon  an  agreement  betwixt  tlie  Constable  and  them,  he 
dispones  to  them  and  their  heirs-male  his  lands  of  Ballegarno,  in  full  satisfaction  of 
all  hereditary  right  and  title  they  might  have  to  the  untailzied  lands  of  Dudhope  or 
the  Constabidary,  by  a  charter  dated  at  Dundee,  October  24.  1539,  which  is  in  the 
Doctor's  hands.  John,  the  eldest  son  of  this  marriage,  by  his  lady  Anne  Bruce, 
daughter  to  Sir  William  Bruce  of  Earlshall,  and  Anne  Scrymgeour  above  mention- 
ed, had  three  sons,  John,  Gilbert,  and  George,  and  three  daughters,  Margaret,  Isa- 
bel, and  Giles.  John  the  eldest  married  Marion  Fotheringham,  of  which  marriage 
the  doctor  is  heir;  so  that  it  was  manifestly  injurious  to  allege  that  this  family  was 
extinguished  by  the  earl's  dying  without  heirs-male  of  his  own  body.  The  achieve- 
ment of  Scrymgeour  Earl  of  Dundee  and  Lord  Dudhope,  is  gules,  a  lion  rampant 
or,  holding  in  his  dexter  paw  a  sword,  proper  :  motto,  Dissipate. 


STEWART  OF  Phisgall. 


IN  my  First  Volume  in  the  System  of  {leraldry,  page  48.  speaking  of  the  no- 
ble family  of  the  Stewarts,  I  mentioned  Sir  John  Stewart  of  Bonkill,  second  son 
to  Alexander,  High-Steward  of  Scotland,  of  whom  descehded  our  kings  of  the 
name  of  Stewart. 

This  John  married  the  daughter  and  heiress  of  Sir  Alexander  Bonkill  of  that  Ilk, 
in  the  shire  of  Berwick ;  the  arms  which  he  carried  on  his  seal  with  a  (esse  cheque, 
as  Stewart,  he  composed  with  his  wife's  arms,  surmounted  with  a  bend  gules, 
charged  with  three  buckles,  for  Bunkle.  With  her  lie  had  several  sons,  heads  of 
great  families  in  the  name  of  Stewart,  yet  extant  with  us;  which  families  were  and 
are  known  by  the  fesse  cheque,  bend  and  buckles,  as  by  the  ancient  Stewarts  Earls 
of  Angus  :  which  dignity  came  to  the  Douglasses  by  marriage  of  the  heiress,  and 
ever  since  their  match  have  carried  the  arms  of  Bunkle  or,  a  fesse  cheque,  azure  und 
argent,  surmounted  with  a  bend  ingrailed  gules,  charged  with  three  buckles  of  the 
first,  for  Stewart  of  Bonkill.  The  Stewarts  Lords  of  Darnly,  Earls  and  Dukes  of 
Lennox,  likewise  descended  of  the  said  family,  had  buckles  on  the  same  account  : 
and  the  Earls  of  Galloway  and  their  progenitors-,  .sometime  designed  of  Dalswinton, 
and  sometime  of  Garlics,  as  descended  from  the  above  Sir  John  and  his  lady,  sur- 
mounts the  fess  cheque  with  the  bend:  but  to  leave  this  noble  family  and  descent  to 
others,  with  the  honourable  cadets  whose  arms  I  have  given  before,  I  here  add  in 
the  supplement  the  descent  and  arms  of  the  family  of  a  cadet  of 'the  Earls  of  Gal- 
loway, viz.  Stewart  of  Phisgall,  the  first  of  which  was  John  Stewart,  second  son  to 
Sir  Alexander  Stewart  of  Garlics,  and  his  Lady  Margaret,  daughter  to  Patrick 
Dunbar  of  Mochrum.  and  full  brother-german  to  Alexander  Stewart,  younger  of 
Garlics,  who  was  slain,  at  the  surprise  of  the  town  of  Stirling,  by  the  Earl  of 


5° 


APPENDIX. 


Huntly  and  the  Laird  of  Buccleugh,  third  September  157 1  :  he  left  issue  a  sod, 
Sir  Alexander,  who  was  lather  of  Sir  Alexander  first  Earl  of  Galloway. 

Which  John  above  mentioned  was  commonly  called  Parson  of  Kirkmahoe,  be- 
cause he  got  the  patronage  teinds,  as  part  of  his  patrimony  from  his  father, 
as  appears  by  a  liferent-tack  of  Larg,  dated  20th  March  1570,  and  another  of  the 
date  the  seventh  of  March  15S5,  granted  to  him  by  the  above  Sir  Alexander  his 
father,  to  his  well-beloved  son  John,  Parson  of  Kirkmahoe,  with  advice  and  con- 
sent of  Alexander  his  eldest-  brother;  which  writs  are  still  m  the  hands  of  the  pre- 
sent Laird  of  Phisgall ;  as  also  an  original  letter  of  attorney  from  Alexander  Stew- 
art, younger  of  Garlies,  to  his  beloved  brother  John  Stewart,  parson  of  Kirkma- 
hoe, to  receive  500  merks,  dated  at  Edinburgh  1570. 

Which  John,  Parson  of  Kirkmahoe,  married  Margaret  Stewart,  daughter  to 
Stewart  of  Barclay,  in  the  parish  of  Monigaff,  by  whom  he  had  two  sons,  Alex- 
ander who  succeeded,  and  John  who  purchased  the  lands  of  Bellimoran  in  Ireland, 
of  whom  is  descended  the  present  Captain  Stewart  of  Bellimoran. 

Alexander  succeeded  his  father  John,  and  married  Sarah,  daughter  of  Dunbar 
of  Machremore,  and  the  same  laird  was  married  to  the  said  Alexander's  sister. 
This  Alexander  was  the  first  purchaser  of  the  lands  of  Phisgall,  in  the  sherift- 
dom  of  Wigton  in  Galloway,  he  had  with  his  lady  seven  sons,  Alexander  who  suc- 
ceeded ; 

Second,  John,  who  continued  in  the  Larg,  he  married  a  daughter  of  Captain 
Ste«  art  of  Bellimoran,  with  her  he  had  several  sons,  Anthony,  Andrew,  Archibald, 
and  George,  who  died  a  colonel  in  the  third  regiment  of  Foot-Guards. 

Third  son  was  William  of  Livingston,  he  married  Sarah,  sister  to  Sir  James 
Dunbar  of  Mochrum,  whose  representative  is  Colonel  John  Stewart,  now  of  Stewart- 
field  in  Teviotdale,  his  eldest  son. 

fourth,  Francis,  who  died  an  ofRcer  in  the  Guard  d'Escosse  in  France. 

Fifth,  LuDivicK,  killed  by  Ohver's  troops  from  England  at  the  bridge  of  Pal- 
neur  in  the  parish  of  Monigaff. 

Sixth,  James  in  BeUiquhair. 

Seventh,  Anthony  of  Balsmith,  who  commanded  a  troop  of  horse  in  Duke 
Hamilton's  engagement  for  King  Charles  I. 

The  above  mentioned  Alexander,  the  eldest  of  those  brothers,  had   to  wife 

Wardlaw,  a  niece  of  the  Laird  of  Enterkin,  by  whom  he  had  John  his 

eldest  son  and  successor,  William,  merciiant  in  London,  who  married  a  daughter  of 
Sir  Samuel  Lul;e  in  Bedfordshire  ;  Robert  and  Thomas  who  died  abroad. 

John  succeeded  his  father  in  the  lands  of  Phisgall,  married  Agnes,  daughter  to  Pro- 
vost Stewart  of  Wigton,  and  his  wife,  daughter  to  Sir  David  Dunbar  of  Baldon,  and 
with  her  he  had  many  children;  Alexander  who  died  young,  David  who  died  com- 
missar of  Wigton,  Thomas  who  died  young,  Robert  a  lieutenant  in  his  Majesty's 
Royal  Navy,  who  died  before  his  father,  and  William  who  now  represents  his  fa- 
ther, Laird  of  Phisgall,  James,  now  guidon  in  his  Majesty's  second  troop  of  Horse_ 
Grenadier  Guards,  and  John  who  died  young,  and  also  seven  daughters. 

The  arms  which  the  family  of  Phisgall  used  to  carry  for  many  years,  are  to  be  seen 
n  their  grave-stones  of  their  burial  place  at  Glasserton,  viz.  or,  a  feiie  cheque  azure 
and  argent,  surmounted  with  a  bend  ingrailed  gules ;  and  in  the  sinister  chief  point 
a  buckle  of  the  last,  to  show  their  descent  as  above ;  and,  for  crest,  a  demi-lion, 
holding  in  his  dexter  paw  a  buckle  or,  with  the  motto,  Suffibulatis,  majores  sequor, 
approven  of,  and  recorded  in  the  Lyon  Register. 


M'DOWALL  OF  Freugh, 


IN  my  former  Volume  of  this  System  I  gave  a  full  account,  from   the   evi- 
dences then  seen,  of  the  ancient  name  of  M'Dowall,  of  which  are  three  families  in 
Galloway  of  note,  and  one  in  Teviotdale,  who  claim  their  descents  from  the  old 
t 


APPENDIX.  51 

Lords,  of  Gallowav,  and  carry  the  arms  as  a  tessera  of  their  descent  :  the  account 
of  these  are  in  page  284,  and  the  two  following  pages;  and  there  are  several  other 
families  descended  from  them. 

But  I  have  received  since,  from  Patrick  M'Dowall  of  Freugh,  a  memorial  ot 
his  descent,  subscribed  by  his  hand  at  Castle  M'Dowall,  the  I5tli  November  1723, 
in  my  cubtody,  for  which  he  produces  several  vouchers  ;  the  purport  whereof  1 
shall  here  communicate,  together  with  what  observations  I  have  discovered  from 
other  hands. 

This  represents  that  Fergus,  heir  of  the  Dovallian  line,  by^some  historians  de- 
signed Prince  of  Galloway,  had  two  sons,  Gilbert  the  eldest,  whose  eldest  son  Dun- 
can was  made  Earl  of  Carrick,  and  Ethred,  father  of  Rowland,  Father  of  Allan 
Lord  of  Galloway,  from  which  Ethred,  (as  I  observed  in  my  former  Volume) 
Garthland,  by  his  information,  claims  his  descent. 

The  earldom  of  Carrick,  in  Gilbert's  family,  sometime  after  ending  in  an  heiress, 
■who  married  with  Robert  Bruce  Earl  of  Annandale,  father  to  Robert  Bruce,  com- 
petitor with  Baliol,  and  afterwards  King  of  Scotland. 

Then  the  representation  of  the  family  of  M'Dowall  Earl  of  Carrick,  fell  to  Gil- 
bert, second  son  to  the  said  Earl,  from  whom  Freugh  derives  his  descent,  and  from 
whence  the  name  of  Gilbert  became  frequent  and  peculiar  to  several  successors  of 
this  family.  I  observe  Sir  James  Dalrymple  in  the  Preface  to  his  Collections  from 
Fordun,  says,  "  That  Gilbert  of  Galloway  died  anno  11 85,  and  that  King  Wil- 
"  liam  gave  to  Gilbert's  son  Duncan  the  county  of  Carrick,  and  King  Alexan- 
"  der  IL  renewed  the  grant  with  the  title  of  Earl  of  that  name.  He  was  succeed- 
"  ed  by  his  son  Neil,  and  he,  by  Martha  Countess  of  Carrick,  married  as  above." 
And  this  author  says  farther,  page  363,  from  Rojer  de  Hoveden,  "  That  Gilbert  of 
"  Galloway  was  younger  son  of  the  said  Fergus,  and  that  the  said  Ethred  was  eld- 
"  est  son." 

But  the  above  memorial  urges,  that  the  said  Gilbert  Earl  of  Carrick  was  eldest 
son  of  the  said  Fergus  ;  as  Buchanan  in  his  Chronicles  plainly  asserts,  page  246,  in 
the  eighth  book  of  it,  translated  in  English,  anno  1693,  revised  by  J.  Fraser  in 
these  words  :  "  Whilst  William  was  King  of  Scotland,  Fergus  Prince  of  Galloway 
•'  left  two  sons,  Gilbert  and  Ethred:  King  William,  to  prevent  the  seeds  of  discord 
"  betwixt  the  two  brothers,  divided  their  father's  inheritance  equally  betwixt  them; 
"  but  Gilbert,  the  eldest,  took  this  highly  amiss,  and  discorded  with  his  second  bro- 
"  ther  Ethred  as  his  rival,  whereupon  Gilbert  was  made  Earl  of  Carrick  ;"  and 
Buchanan  there  also  cites  William  of  Newbury,  the  English  writer,  to  have  record- 
ed the  same,  as  in  page  247,  adding,  "  That  Allan,  grandson  of  the  said  Ethred, 
"  was  made  Lord  of  Galloway;"  and,  as  1  observed  in  ray  former  System,  page  161, 
in  the  reign  of  the  said  King  William,  anno  1183,  Henry  Kennedy  assisted  Gilbert, 
eldest  son  of  Fergus,  Prince  of  Galloway,  in  his  wars.  There  is  no  doubt  the  said 
Gilbert  was  designed  of  Galloway,  as  eldest  son  and  heir  of  it,  till  he  was  made 
Earl  of  Carrick  ;  therefore  Freugh  claims  being  heir-male  of  Gilbert  Earl  of  Car- 
rick, in  default  of  issue-male  of  Duncan  and  Neil  Earls  of  Carrick  ;  the  barons  oif 
Dowalston  being  the  next  heirs-male. 

This  claim  Freugh  fortifies  by  divers  adminicles  following,  viz.  The  designa- 
tions of  the  lands  possessed  by  his  ancestors,  viz.  Dowalston,  ?mm  Dovallus  of  Gal- 
loway, mentioned  in  my  farmer  Volume ;  which  barony  (as  also  that  of  Ravinston, 
with  that  of  Stephens  Kirk  *,  Freugh,  Urril,  and  Lochronald,  and  others)  have 
been,  and  most  part  of  them  are  in  possession  of  his  family,  who  sometimes  de- 
signed themselves  of  Dowalston,  of  Ravinston,  and  also  of  Freugh;  which  descent, 
from  the  earls  of  Carrick,  is  claimed  by  no  other  of  the  name,  (as  Freugh  repre- 
sents) and  from  which  title  his  predecessors  were  secluded  by  Edward  Bruce,  bro- 
ther to  King  Robert,  then  created  Eari  of  Carrick. 

And  it  is  also  observable,  that  no  other  family  of  the  name  ever  had  the 
designation  of  their  lands  from  the  name  :  and  in  the  barony  of  Dowalston 
there  is  a  large  fresh  water  lake,  and  a  pleasant  isle  in  it,  whereupon,  of  old, 
was  built  a  castle,  the  ruins  whereof  bears  marks  of  great  antiquity,  and  is  said,  by 
tradition  in  that  country,  to  have  been  the  seat  of  the  old  family. 

And,  as  I  observed  in  my  former  Volume,  I  have  seen  a  charter  granted  to  a  pre- 
decessor of  the  family  of  Freugh,  by  King  James  IIL  anna  1473,  upon  the  resigna- 

*  jNow  called  Stonny-Kirk.     E. 
Vol.  II.  4  U 


52  APPENDIX. 

tion  of  Gilbert  M'Dowall,  then  designed  of  Ravinston,  to  Gilbert  M'Dowall  his  son, 
wherein  several  lands  are  contained,  with  the  advocation,  donation,  and  patronage 
of  the  parish  of  Stephen's  Kirk,  which  appears  to  have  been  in  the  family  for  seve- 
ral years  before,  albeit  older  evidents  be  lost  by  the  calamities  mentioned  formerly  ; 
which  lands  and  patronage  are  contained  in  other  later  charters  ;  but,  it  is  obser- 
vable, this  church  is  the  burial-place  of  this  family,  and  the  parish  within  which 
their  mansion-house  and  many  of  their  lands  lie  ;  and  is  also  the  burial-place  of 
Garthland's  family,  where  his  mansion-house  and  lands  also  are  ;  and  is  also  M'- 
Dowall of  Logan's  burial-place,  whose  lands  lie  in  the  next  adjacent  parish  :  And 
this  honorary  grant  from  the  crown  (of  the  patronage  in  this  family)  does  import, 
that  it  has  been  the  principal  and  considerable  family,  that  grant  being  many 
years  before  the  Reformation. 

I  have  by  me  an  extract  of  a  public  protest,  taken  by  the  Laird  of  Freugh  against 
the  Laird  of  Garthland,  under  the  hand  of  Robert  Ker,  notary-public,  dated  the 
22d  of  April  1721,  protesting  against  the  said  Garthland,  or  any  other  of  the  name, 
claiming  precedency  or  chiefship;  and  also  against  a  pretended  bond  of  man-rent, 
mentioned  in  Garthland's  memorial  of  his  family,  inserted  in  my  former  Volume ; 
which  protest  contains  divers  weighty  reasons,  and  condescends  upon  vouchers 
to  show,  that  James  M'Dowall  of  Freugh  had  to  lady,  Florence,  sister  to  Uthred 
M'Dowall  of  Garthland,  they  having  no  male  issue  alive,  their  daughter  Margaret, 
sole  heiress,  married  a  gentleman  of  the  name,  and  her  near  i-elation,  neither  of 
whom  having  attained  to  majority,  the  said  Garthland,  uncle  and  tutor  to  her,  (for 
his  consent  to  the  said  marriage  allenarly)  did  extort  from  them  a  paper  containing 
several  illegal  and  prejudicial  obligations,  which  were  still  after  opposed  by  them. 
And  though  such  a  bond  were  real,  the  bond  produced  has  neither  witnesses  nor 
seal,  which  were  necessary  qualities,  valid  in  all  such  writs  at  that  time  ;  yet  these 
were  discharged  by  divers  acts  of  Parliament,  and  highly  punishable,  though  they 
were  esteemed  in  those  days  not  at  all  as  a  mark  of  vassalage,  but  as  mutual  con- 
tracts of  defence  amongst  clans :  And,  as  to  Garthland's  claim  of  precedency,  up- 
on his  great-grandfather  John  being  made  knight-batchelor  by  King  Charles,  and 
his  grandfather  James  knighted  by  Oliver  Cromwell,  neither  of  these  give  any  real 
title  to  chiefship  or  precedency. 

And,  for  my  vindication,  I  must  beg  my  reader's  pardon,  to  complain  of  a  piece 
of  injustice  done  me  by  Garthland,  or  his  doer ;  for,  upon  production  of  that  al- 
leged bond  of  man-rent,  together  with  the  other  of  Logan's,  mentioned  by  me  in 
the  same  place,  I  was  threatened  with  a  protest  if  I  refused  to  mention  them  in  the 
said  Volume,  which  I  could  not  condescend  to,  unless  they  were  recorded  in  pub- 
lic register,  where  they  may  be  patent  to  all  the  lieges,  as  vouchers  of  what  1  was 
to  advance ;  but  I  was  prevailed  with,  (upon  promise  that  they  should  be  record- 
ed) albeit  it  be  not  yet  performed,  nor  safe  for  them  to  record  it,  as  it  appears. 

Freugh  has  sent  me  an  account  of  the  names  of  his  predecessors  since  the  year 
1445,  the  vouchers  whereof  I  have  also  seen  in  the  hands  of  his  doer  Mr  Robert 
Fullarton,  Writer  to  the  Signet,  one  of  which  was  Gilbert  M'Dowall,  Baron  of 
Dowalston  and  Ravinston,  who  also  had  the  seventeen  merk  land  of  Stephen's 
Kirk,  (wherein  the  house  of  Freugh  lies)  the  ten  pound  land  of  Urril,  and  ten 
pound  land  of  Lochronald,  with  the  patronage  of  Stephen's  Kirk,  these  being  a  part 
of  the  lordship  of  Galloway,  and  the  twenty  merk  land  of  Barjarg,-  a  part  of  the 
earldom  of  Carrick. 

He  was  succeeded  by  Gilbert  M'Dowall  his  son,  who  was  succeeded  by  a  third 
Gilbert  his  son  (who  was  remarkable  for  his  valour  and  loyalty,  and  died  in  the 
battle  of  Flodden)  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son  Fergus,  who  had  for  his  lady 
Janet  Kennedy,  sister  to  Gilbert  Lord  Kennedy,  then  made  Earl  of  Cassilis ;  which 
Fergus  was  killed  in  the  battle  of  Pinky,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son  James, 
who  was  infeft  in  the  foresaid  lands  and  patronage  by  a  precept  forth  of  the  Chan- 
cellary,  which  bears  these  words,  "  Fergusius  M'Douall  de  Freugh  obiit  ad  fidem 
"  &  pacem  sub  vexillo  nostro,  in  campo  belli  apud  Pinkincleugh,  pater  Jacobi 
"  M'Douall  nunc  de  Freugh." 

The  said  James  was  succeeded  by  John  M'Dowall  his  son,  who,  dying  without 
heirs,  was  succeeded  by  his  sister  Margaret,  heiress  foresaid,  who  married  John 
M'Dowall  of  Downdowall,  her  kinsman,  who  were  succeeded  by  John  M'Dowall 


APPENDIX.  5.^ 

their  son,  who,  during  Oliver  Cromwell's  Usurpation,  signalized  himself  by  his  op- 
postion  to  the  usurper's  forces  in  Galloway,  where  many  of  them  were  cut  off,  and 
he  never  yielded  obedience;  and  thereupon  the  EngHsh  took  all  his  papers  and 
goods  which  they  could  reach,  and  burnt  his  old  house  and  fort  of  Freugh,  car 
rying  hmiself  prisoner  to  England,  detaining  him  there,  till,  by  a  happy  strata- 
gem, he  made  his  escape  a  little   before  King  Charles  11.  his  restoration. 

The  said  John  was  succeeded  by  his  son  Uthred,  who  was  likewise  remarkable 
for  his  valour,  being  commander  of  horse  with  the  Earl  of  Cassilis  in  England, 
where  he  received  several  wounds  in  the  king's  service,  and  was  afterwards  com- 
missioner for  the  shire  of  Wigton,  in  the  first  session  of  the  tii-st  Parliament  ol' 
King  Charles  II.  in  which  station  he  continued  to  his  death. 

He  was  succeeded  by  Patrick  his  eldest  son,  and  he,  by  his  eldest  son  Patrick, 
present  Baron  of  ISI'Dovvall  and  Freugh,  so  designed  in  a  charter  I  have  seen  under 
the  Great  Seal,  uniting  all  his  lands  in  one  barony  :  The  apparency  of  which  suc- 
cession is  in  the  person  of  John  M'Dowall  his  eldest  son  ;  so  that  1  am  obliged  to 
say  1  have  seen  documents  for  a  succession  of  eleven  generations  from  the  foresaid 
Gilbert,  anno  1445,  to  the  said  John,  now  heir  apparent. 

It  is  to  be  noticed,  that  any  variation  which  may  appear  betwixt  this  account 
and  what  was  inserted  in  my  former  Volume,  concerning  Freugh's  predecessors' 
names,  or  proper  places  of  succession,  was  occasioned  through  his  mistake,  by  want 
of  some  of  the  vouchers  now  produced. 

It  is  also  observable,  that,  by  a  writ  past  betwixt  the  foresaid  James  M'Dowai-l 
of  Freugh,  and  the  said  Uthred  M'Dowall  of  Garthland,  dated  the  26th  of  June 
1559,  which  I  have  seen  in  the  said  Mr  Fullarton's  hands,  wherein  several  other 
gentlemen  of  note  are  concerned  and  nominate,  the  said  Freugh  is  designed  first. 
and  before  Garthland  ;  at  which  time  the  order  of  placing  names  by  claim  of  dis- 
tinction was  very  much  noticed  :  And  I  have  seen  several  writs  wherein  Freugh's 
predecessors  have  the  epithet  of  honourable  men,  which,  in  those  days,  was  only 
granted  to  considerable  persons  that  were  not  nobilitate. 

It  is  also  very  observable,  that,  by  charters  and  sasines  produced  to  me,  and  irt 
the  hands  of  the  said  Mr  FuUanon,  it  appears,  that  Thomas  M'Dow^all  of  Garth- 
land, two  of  the  name  of  Uthred,  and  Sir  John  and  Sir  James,  held  as  vassals  of 
the  foresaid  family  of  Ravinston,  their  superior,  for  the  space  of  157  years  succes- 
sive, from  1479  till  1636,  for  some  lands ;  and  no  doubt  they  held  them  in  the 
same  manner  many  years  before,  though  the  former  vouchers  are  not  yet  found. 

Garthland  neither  condescends  upon,  nor  produced  to  me  any  charter  of  his 
lands  holding  of  the  crown,  but  only  a  charter  granted  by  Archibald  Douglas,  then 
Lord  of  Galloway  and  Annandale,  to  the  said  Thomas  M'Dowall  of  Garthland,  anno 
1413,  as  in  his  memorial  in  my  former  Volume,  whereby  it  appears  they  held  their 
lands  as  vassals  of  a  subject  only. 

Freugh  also  represents,  that  Garthland  cannot  produce  any  document  or  vouch- 
er for  his  predecessors  having  any  precedency  or  chiefship  ;  but  ever  since  the  be- 
fore-mentioned heiress  of  Freugh,  their  niece  and  pupil,  they  have  been  grasping 
at  it,  and  by  the  before-mentioned  indirect  means  took  advantage  of  her,  and  her 
then  designed  spouse  ;  he  in  furore  amoris,  and  they  mutually  in  love,  the  said 
bond  of  man-rent  was  obtained,  and  other  groundless  alledgeances  since  founded 
thereon,  though  contrary  to  law,  and  neither  then  (though  the  family  fell  in 
troubles,  by  their  predecessors  being  killed  in  the  king  and  country's  service)  nor 
now  owned,  but  is  renounced  and  disclaimed  on  all  occasions. 

This  family  bears  for  their  coat  of  arms  the  lion  rampant,  crowned  and  collared 
with  a  broken  crown,  (in  memory  of  their  predecessor  Dovallus  having  killed 
Nothatus,  and  setting  Reutberus  the  rightful  king  on  his  throne)  as  in  Plate  of 
Achievements  in  my  former  System,  with  helmet,  maiitling,  and  supporters,  and 
others  suitable  to  their  quality. 

There  were  several  old  cadets  of  this  family,  and  some  of  them  extinct :  Those 
remaining  are  Mr  Andrew  M'Dowall,  Mr  Thomas,  James,  Alexander,  and  Chai-les 
M-Dowalls,  men  of  estates  and  other  interests  in  the  kingdom  of  Ireland,  and 
Uthred  M'Dowall  of  Hackburn  in  the  shire  of  Roxburgh,  and  Captain  William 
M'Dowall  of  Stratfordhall  in  Buckinghamshire  in  England,  and  Mr  WilHam  M'- 
Dowall, brother-german  to  the  present  Freugh,  and  Mr  William  M'Dowall,  mer- 


54  APPENDIX. 

chant  in  Stranraei  :  all  which  cadets  of  this  family  do  bear  the  coat  of  anus  of 
the  family,  with  their  different  marks  of  descent ;  as  particularly  the  above  Wil- 
liam, brother-german  to  the  present  Patrick  M'Dowall  of  Freugh,  and  son  to  the 
above  Patrick,  and  their  mother  Barbara  Fullarton,  daughter  to  FuUarton  of  that 
Ilk,  an  officer  in  the  army  in  time  of  war,  and  now,  in  time  of  peace,  a  principal 
officer  of  his  majesty's  customs  in  Scotland,  carries,  as  I  am  informed,  his  pater- 
nal arms  of  Freugh,  and  by  way  of  addition,  for  ditference,  on  a  dexter  canton,  a 
part  of  his  maternal  coat,  viz.  an  otter's  head,  and  all  within  a  bordure,  char- 
ged with  seven  boars'  heads  erased,  to  represent  his  marriage  with  Jean,  a  daughter 
of  Gordon  of  Schirmers,  descended  of  Gordon  of  Lochinvar;  and  the  number  seven 
is  chosen  by  him  to  represent  his  being  a  seventh  son. 


DOUGLAS  OF  BoNj EDWARD,  AND  DOUGLAS  of  Tympyndzan-. 


IN  the  First  Volume  of  this  System  of  Heraldry,  page  78,  I  gave  the  arms  and 
rise  of  the  ancient  family  of  Douglas  of  Bonjedward,  from  the  paintings  of  th? 
Genealogical  Tree  of  the  House  of  Douglas  (in  Glenbervie's  custody),  which  makes 
the  first  of  this  family  to  be  a  third  son  of  William  Earl  of  Angus,  and  brother  of 
George  Earl  of  Angus,  who  married  the  daughter  of  Sibbald  of  Balgonie,  some- 
time treasurer  of  Scotland ;  and  that  this  family  of  Bonjedward  carried  only  the 
paternal  coat  of  Douglas,  ,with  a  larabel  of  three  points  gules,  in  the  collar  point 
of  the  shield. 

There  is  a  charter  granted  by  Isabel  Countess  of  Marr  to  Thomas  Douglas  the 
son  of  John,  and  Margaret  Douglas,  his  spouse,  of  all  the  lands  of  Bonjedward, 
as  bounded  in  the  charter,  which  is  confirmed  by  Robert  Duke  of  Albany,  Earl  of 
Fife  and  iVIonteith,  Governor  of  Scotland,  his  charter  of  the  date  the  24th  of  Oc- 
tober 1407,  the  second  year  of  his  government.  The  family  of  Tympyndean  is  as 
follows, 

I.  George  Douglas  of  Bonjedward,  with  consent  of  James  Douglas  his  eldest 
son  and  apparent  heir,  gives  dileclo  filio  meo  Andreee  Douglas,  all  and  haill  the  lands 
of  Tympyndean,  with  its  pertinents,  lying  within  the  territory  of  Bonjedward, 
regality  of  Jedworth  Forest,  and  shire  of  Roxburgh,  as  the  charter  dated  at  Bon- 
jedward the  ist  of  July  1479,  '^°  which  his  seal  of  arms  is  appended,  having  only 
a  plain  shield,  a  man's  heart,  (not  crowned)  and  on  a  chief,  three  stars  (the  arms 
of  Douglas)  vv^ithout  any  difference  or  additional  figure,  .the  legend  round  the  seal 
S.  Georgii  Douglas  ;  and  the  same  day,  month,  and  year  befoie  mentioned,  by  a 
precept  of  sasine,  Andrew  Douglas  is  infeft  in  the  above  lands,  and  was  after  suc- 
ceeded by  his  son 

II.  Archibald  Douglas  of  Tympyndean,  who  married  a  daughter  of  Peter 
Marshal  in  Lanton,  and  got  with  her  some  lands  there,  as  by  a  precept  of  sasine, 
dated  the  15th  of  June  1517,  wh^ch  the  family  possesses  still.  Their  son  and  suc- 
cessor was 

III.  Andrew  ;  he  married  Katharine  Gladstanes,  eldest  of  the  three  heiresses 
portioners,  daughters  of  William  Gladstanes  of  Lanton,  with  whom  he  got  several 
lands  there,  which  the  family  of  Tympyndean  still  possesseth. 

IV.  Andrew  Douglas  of  Tympyndean  succeeded  his  father  Andrew,  and  mar- 
ried Margaret  TurnbuU,  daughter  to  Gavin  Turnbull  of  Ancrum-miU,  as  by  their 
contract  of  marriage,  dated  the  loth  of  December  1562. 

V.  Stephen  succeeded  his  father  in  the  above-mentioned  lands,  and,  by  contract 
of  marriage,  20th  May  1595,  married  Jean,  daughter  to  Andrew  Halyburton  of 
Muirhouselaw,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son 

VI.  John  of  Tympyndean ;  he  married  Mary,  eldest  daughter  to  William 
Douglas  -of  Bonjedward,  the  4th  of  April  1632.     Their  son 

VII.  William  succeeded,  and  married  Alison,  daughter  to  John  Turnbull  of 
Minto,  and  his  lady,  Elizabeth, .  daughter  of  Sir  Gilbert  Elliot  of  Stobs,  and  Mai- 


APPENDIX.  5.S 

garet,  daughter  to  Sir  Wultev  Scott  of  Harden,  as  by  contract  of  marriage  27th 
July  1655.     Their  son, 

VIII.  John  Douglas  of  Tympyndean,  married  Euphame,  daughter  to  Williana 
TurnbuU  of  Sharpelaw,  and  of  Christian,  daughter  of  William  Ker  of  NewtoPv 
whose  mother  was  a  daughter  of  Sir  Archibald  Douglas  of  Cavers,  the  6th  of 
December  1679.     Their  son  and  successor  is  tiie  present 

IX.  William  Douglas  of  Tympyndean  ;  he  married  Jean,  daughter  to  Thomas 
Rutherford  of  that  Ilk,  22d  of  February  171 8,  who  carries,  as  I  am  informed,  tho 
arms  of  Douglas,  quartered  with  these  of  Gladstones. 


SCOTT  ov  Thirlestane. 


AS  for  the  origin  and  rise  of  the  surname  of  Scott,  it  is  as  uncertain  as  all  other 
matters  of  antiquity,  especially  surnames,  which  could  not  be  older  than  iioc, 
when  surnames  began  with  us.  The  first  of  the  name  to  be  met  with  is  one 
Uchtred  Jilius  Scott,  amongst  the  witnesses  in  a  charter  of  King  David  I.  to  the 
abbacy  of  Selkirk.  He  might  have  been  the  first  of  the  surname  of  Scott,  as  Sir 
James  Dalrymple  observes  in  his  Collections,  page  354. 

There  is  one  Herberttis  Scotus,  in  the  foresaid  king's  reign,  witness  in  a  charter  oi 
Robert  Bishop  of  St  Andrews  to  the  abbacy  of  Holyroodhouse.  There  is  a  charter 
by  King  William,  IValtero  filio  IValteri  Scoti  of  the  lands  of  Alrethes.  In  the  Re- 
gister of  Kelso,  fol.  57  and  6^,  Ricardus  Scotus  is  to  be  found  in  the  reign  of 
Alexander  II.  HlHielmus  Scotus  is  witness  in  a  charter  of  Walter  II.  Senesaillus 
Scotia  to  the  abbacy  of  Paisley,  fol.  10,  concerning  the  church  of  Dundonald.  In 
the  chartulary  of  the  priory  and  convent  of  Coldingham  there  is  to  be  found 
Chnrta  Patricio  Scoto  de  terris  in  Riston  comparatis  a  domino  regc,  post  forisfacturam 
tintecessorum  ejusdem  Patricii,  before  the  year  1273. 

I  have  given  a  short  account  of  several  ancient  and  honourable  families  of  the 
name  of  Scott,  in  the  First  Volume  of  this  Treatise,  page  86  and  c^6,  amongst 
whom  is  Scott  of  Thirlestane,  anciently  designed  of  Houpayslay,  or  Eskdale;  and 
I  shall  here  again  subjoin  the  descent  of  this  family,  with  its  branches  and  inter- 
marriages, as  far  back  as  I  am  informed. 

I.  The  first  I  have  met  with  of  this  family  was  Arthur  Scott  of  Houpayslay, 
or  Eskdale,  who  married  a  daughter  of  Maxwell  of  Terreagles,  thereafter  Lord 
Herries,  and  now  Earl  of  Nithsdale.     He  was  succeeded  by  his  son 

II.  Robert  Scoft  of  Houpayslay,  (commonly  called  Robert  of  Eskdale)  War- 
den of  the  Middle-Border  betwixt  Scotland  and  England.  He  married  a  daughter 
of  Somerville  Lord  Somerville,  and  with  her  had  issue 

III.  Sir  William  Scott  of  Houpayslay  who  succeeded,  and  married  Janet, 
daughter  of  Gladstanes  of  Cocklav/;  and  he  was  succeeded  by  his  eldest  son 

IV.  Sir  Walter  Scott  of  Houpayslay,  knight,  who  married  a  daughter  of 
Douglas  of  Cavers;  she  bore  to  him  three  sons;  the  eldest  was  Abbot  of  Melrose, 
the  second  David,  and  the  third  Adam  Scott  of  Hassendean. 

V.  David  succeeded  his  father  in  the  lands  of  Houpayslay,  and,  by  the  favour 
of  his  eldest  brother  the  abbot,  got  the  lands  of  Thirlestane,  from  which,  ever 
since,  the  family  took  their  designation.  He  had  to  wife  a  daughter  of  Scott  of 
Roberton,  with  whom  he  had  Robert,  who  succeeded  Walter,  commonly  called 
Hardy  Watt,  who  was  killed,  at  the  battle  of  Pavia,  and  James,  who  went  to  Ger- 
many. 

VI.  Robert  Scott,  first  designed  Laird  of  Thirlestane,  who  married  a  daughter 
of  Johnstone  of  that  Ilk,  now  Marquis  of  Annandale,  with  whom  he  had  five  sons; 
John,  who  succeeded ;  second,  Scott  of  Hundleshope,  in  the  shire  of  Tw;eeddale, 
of  whom  is  descended  the  present  Captain  David  Scott  of  Hundleshope,  whose 
arms  are  recorded  in  the  Lyon  Register,  and  blazoned  in  the  First  Part  of  this 
System,  and  Plate  of  Achievements ;  third,  Scott  of  Dry  hope;  fourth,  Scott  of 
Mountbenger;  and,  fifth,  Scott  of  Bowhill. 

Vol.  IL  4  X 


56  ^PJ'ENDIX. 

VII.  John  Scott  of  Thule.aane  succeeded  his  father  Robert,  a  gentleman  of 
singular  parts,  and  of  an  entire  loyalty  to  King  James  V.  who,  for  his  ready  ser- 
vices, was  honoured  by  that  king  with  a  part  of  the  royal  bearing,  and  other 
suitable  figures  to  timbre  his  shield  of  arms;  and,  to  perpetuate  the  memory  of  his 
seasonable  services  to  that  king,  there  is  an  order  granted  to  the  Lyon  Herald  and 
his  deputies,  under  the  hand  of  his  Majesty  and  Secretary,  Sir  Thomas  Erskine  of 
Brechin,  to  record  in  .their  books:  The  principal  of  which  I  have  seen,  now  in  the 
custody  of  the  present  Sir  William  Scott  of  Thulestane,  baronet,  inserted  in  the  First 
\'^olume  of  this  System,  page  96. 

This  John  Scott  of  Thirlestane  married  a  daughter  of  Scott  of  AHanhaugh, 
and  with  her  had  four  sons;  Robert,  who  succeeded;  second,  Simon,  called  Long- 
.<ptar,  was  tutor  of  Thirlestane,  and  built  the  Tower  of  Gamelscleugh  ;  third, 
Andrew,  Hrtht-r  of  Sir  John  Scott  of  Newburgh,  of  whom  are  the  Scotts  of  Rennel- 
biirn;  and.  the  iburth  son,  Adam  Scott  of  Gilmerscleugh. 

VIII.  Robert  of  Thirlestane,  who  was  Warden-Depute  of  the  West-Borders, 
married  Margaret  Scott,  sister  to  the  first  Lord  Buccleugh;  he  had  with  her  two 
sons.  Sir  Robert  and  Walter.  He  had  also  another  son  called  William,  to  whom 
he  gave  a  piece  of  land  called  Merrylaws,  to  this  day  possessed  by  his  descen- 
dants. 

IX.  Sir  Robert  Scott  of  Thirlestane  was  twice  married ;  first,  to  a  daughter  of 
Cranston  of  that  Ilk,  with  her  he  had  Robert  Scott  of  Cruxton,  who  died  with- 
out issue,  and  Walter,  who  succeeded  his  father;  secondly,  he  married  a  daughter 
of  Jardine  of  Applegirth,  from  whom  came  the  Scotts  of  Doventon.  Sir  Robert 
Scott  sold  the  lands  of  Thirlestane  to  Sir  William  Scott  of  Harden. 

X.  Walter.  Scott,  of  the  first  marriage,  married  Marion,  daughter  to  Sir 
Patrick  Porteous  of  Hackshaw,  and  with  her  had 

XI.  Patrick.  Scott  of  Thirlestane,  or  Houpayslay.  He  recovered  the  lands  of 
Thirlestane  from  Sir  William  Scott  of  Harden,  and  married  Isabel,  daughter  to 
Sir  John  Murray  of  Blackbarony,  baronet,  and  with  her  he  had  Francis,  who  suc- 
ceeded, David  and  Walter  who  died  young;  and  three  daughters,  Jean,  married  to 
Sir  James  Hay  of  Linplum,  Margaret,  to  Sir  Robert  Bannerman  of  Elsick,  and 
Mary,  to  Sir  WiUiam  Primrose  of  Carrington,  now  Viscount  of  Primrose.  All 
these  daughters  had  issue  to  their  husbands. 

XII.  Sir  Francis  Scott,  being  first  made  a  knight,  and  after  honoured  with  the 
dignity  of  baronet  in  the  year  1666,  married  Lady  Henrietta  Ker,  daughter  to 
William  Earl  of  Lothian.  He  had  with  her  several  children,  who  all  died  young, 
except  the  eldest  son  who  succeeded  him,  and  one  daughter  called  Henrietta,  now 
living. 

XIII.  Sir  William  Scott  of  Thirlestane,  baronet,  married  first  Elizabeth  Napier, 
daughter  to  the  Lady  Napier,  with  whom  he  has  the  present  Francis  Lord  Napier, 
whose  arms  are  to  be  seen  in  the  First  Volume  of  this  System.  Secondly,  Sir 
William  married  Dame  Jean  Nisbet,  only  daughter  of  Sir  John  Nisbet  of  Dirleton, 
and  widow  of  Sir  William  Scott  of  Harden.     She  died  without  issue. 


CUMIN  OF  Coulter. 


I.  THE  firbt  of  which  was  Jardine  Cumin,  second  lawful  son  to  William  Cumin 
Earl  of  Buchan.  He  married  Margaret  Ross,  daughter  to  William  Earl  of  Ross, 
and  with  her  had  Philip  Cumin  his  son  and  heir.  He  got  from  his  father,  the  Earl 
of  Buchan,  the  lands  of  Inverallacliy,  in  the  year  1270. 

II.  Which  Philip  Cumin  married  Marjory  Wauchope,  heiress  and  daughter  to 
Sir  Adam  Wauchope  of  Coulter,  and  of  Arbeck,  knight.  The  original  charter  of 
this  family  of  Wauchope  is  granted  by  King  Alexander  I.  1124,  which  is  now  in 
the  custody  of  Cumin  of  Coulter,  who  got  these  lands  by  the  foresaid  marriage, 
and  with  her  had 


APPENDIX.  57 

III.  Sir  William  Cumin,  his  son  and  heir,  who  married  Dame  Marjory  Douglas, 
daughter  to  James  Earl  of  Douglas,  Lord  of  Nithsdale,  with  whom  he  had  his  son 
and  successor 

IV.  James  Cumin,  who  married  Elizabeth  Irvine,  daughter  to  the  Laird  of  Len- 
way,  and  with  her  begot 

V.  William  Cumin,  who  married  Elizabeth  Meldrum,  daughter  to  Sir  William 
Meldrum  of  Fyvie,  knight,  and  with  her  begot  Alexander,  his  eldest  sor»,  and 
William  Cumin  his  second ;  the  eldest  married  Christian  Burnet,  daughter  to  the 
Laird  of  Leys,  his  near  kinswoman,  and  for  the  consanguinity  procured  a  dis- 
pensation from  the  pope,  dated  tlie  nth  January  1480,  now  in  the  hands  of 
Cumin  of  Coulter.  His  father,  Wdliam,  disliking  the  marriage,  did  dispone  to 
his  second  son,  William,  the  lands  of  Inverallachy,  and  others  he  had  then  in 
Buchan,  and  reserved  only  the  barony  of  Coulter  with  the  pertinents  to  his  eldest 
son. 

VI.  Which  Alexander  Cumin  of  Coulter,  with  his  above-mentioned  spouse,  be- 
got his  successor 

VII.  Alexander,  who  married  Elizabeth  Blinshall,  daughter  to  Sir  Jlobert 
Blinshall  of Provost  of  Aberdeen,  and  with  her  had  his  son  and  heir 

VIII.  John,  who  married  Janet  Irvine,  daughter  to  the  Laird  of  Drum,  and  with 
her  had  his  son  and  heir 

IX.  Alex.ander  Cumin  of  Coulter,  who  married  Janet,  daughter  to  James 
Stewart  Lord  Innermeth,  (she  having  gotten  from  her  father  an  assignation  to  the 
gift  of  Coulter's  marriage,  and  intimate  the  same  to  him,  conform  to  an  instrument 
of  intimation,  which  is  in  the  charter-chest  of  Coulter)  and  with  her  he  begot  his 
son  and  successor 

X.  Alexander  Cumin  of  Coulter,  who  married  Helen  Wood,  daughter  to  Walter 
Wood  of  Balbegno,  and  with  her  had 

XI.  Sir  Alexander  Cumin  of  Coulter.  He  married  Margaret  Gordon,  daughter 
to  the  Laird  of  Tarpersie,  and  with  her  had  his  son  and  successor 

XII.  Alexander,  who  married  Jean  Wood,  daughter  to  Sir  Hary  Wood  of 
Bonington,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son 

XIII.  Alexander  Cumin  of  Coulter,  who  married  Helen  AUardice,  daughter  to 
James  AUardice  of  that  Ilk,  and  with  her  had 

XIV.  Alexander  Cumin,  who  was  made  a  knight  baronet,  married  Elizabeth 
Swinton,  daughter  to  Alexander  Swinton  of  Mersington,  one  of  the  Senators  of  the 
College  of  Justice.     There  eldest  son  and  successor 

XV.  Captain  Alexander  Cumin,  knight  baronet,  who  married  Anna  White- 
hall, daughter  to  Launcelot  Whitehall,  Esq.  an  Enghsh  gentleman  of  the  family 
of  the  Whitehalls  in  Shropshire,  and  late  commissioner  in  the  customs  for  Scot- 
land, and  with  his  lady  has  a  son,  Alexander,  about  five  years  of  age. 

The  Lyon  King  at  Arms  recorded  the  arms  of  this  family,  as  I  mentioned  before 
in  the  First  Volume,  page  169,  viz.  azure,  three  garbs  ar,  within  a  plain  bordure 
of  the  last,  as  being  descended  of  a  second  son  of  Cumin  Earl  of  Buchan  ;  which 
family,  being  extinct,  that  of  Coulter  assumed  the  plain  arms  without  any  addition, 
and,  as  I  am  informed,  are  to  be  seen  on  the  great  hall  of  Inverallachy,  the  old 
mansion-house  of  the  predecessors  of  Cumin  of  Coulter,  now  possessed  by  the 
Erasers:  As  also  tlie  same  plain  arms  are  to  be  seen  on  the  House  of  Coulter, 
supported  by  two  ostriches;  crest,  a  garb  or:  motto,  Courage. 


INGLIS  OF  St  Leonards. 


I  HAVE  given  before  the  arms  of  Inglis  of  Newton,  or  Newtonlees,  page  83. 
whose  grandfather,  Cornelius  Inglis,  is  said  to  be  a  lawful  son  of  Murdiston,  in  the 
Lyon  Register;  the  blazon,  thus,  azure,  a  lion  rampant  argent,  on  a  cliief  ingrailed 
of  the  second,  three  stars  of  the  first ;  crest,  a  star  environed  \^"ith  clouds,  proper. 


58  APPENDIX. 

His  son  was  John  Inglis  of  Newton,  and  his  son  was  Cornelius  Inghs  of  Eastbarns, 
who  married  Janet,  daughter  to  Mr  William  Kelly,  writer  in  Edinburgh.  With 
her  he  had  four  sons,  Patrick,  Thomas,  William  and  Mr  James :  Which  last  pur- 
chased the  lands  of  St  Leonards  of  late,  and  married  Elizabeth  Holburne,  daughter 
to  Menstrie.  He  is  succeeded  in  the  lands  of  St  Leonards  by  his  eldest  son  John 
Inp-lis  of  St  Leonards. 


MACFARLANE  of  that  Ilk. 


THE  armorial  bearing  of  this  family  is  argent,  a  saltier  ingrailed  betwixt  four 
roses  gules,  which  is  now  exactly  the  coat  of  the  old  family  of  Lennox  ;  and,  as 
repres€ntative  of  that  family,  and  a  principal  family  of  the  name,  hath  been  in  use 
to  assume,  for  supporters,  two  Highlandmen  in  belted  plaids,  with  broad-swords, 
and  bows  and  arrows  in  full  draught,  all  proper  ;  crest,  a  demi-savage  grasping  in 
Ills  dexter  hand  a  sheaf  of  arrows,  and  pointing  with  his  sinister  to  an  imperial 
crown  or  :  motto.  This  Fll  defend  ;  and  on  a  compartment  wavey  the  word 
Locbsloy,  which  is  the  Macfarlane's  cri  de  guerre,  or  slughorn  :  Lochsloy  being 
a  place  in  the  Arroquhar,  where  this  clan  generally  rendezvous  themselves  before 
a  battle. 

This  family  is  in  old  writs  promiscuously  designed  Macfarlane  of  that  Ilk,  and 
of  Arroquhar,  and  sometimes  both  these  titles  are  joined  in  one ;  as  in  the  roll  of 
the  clans  in  the  acts  of  Parliament,  anno  1587,  one  of  the  heads  of  this  family 
is  designed  the  Laird  of  Macfarlane  of  the  Arroquhar.  Vide  Pari.  11.  King 
James  VI. 

The  representer  of  this  family  being  undoubtedly  heir-male  of  the  old  earls  of 
Lennox,  it  will  not  be  amiss  to  begin  the  account  of  the  family  with  the  origin  of 
the  ancient  Earls  of  Lennox. 

Peter  Walsh  and  Dr  Keating,  two  Irish  historians,  pretend  that  the  family  of 
Lennox  is  of  Irish  extraction,  and  that  the  founder  of  it  was  Mainus,  son  to  one 
of  the  provincial  kings  of  Leinster,  who  came  to  Scotland  in  the  reign  of  King 
Fincormachus,  and  married  Mungenia  that  king's  daughter.  On  the  other  hand, 
Mr  Simson  in  his  History  of  the  Stewarts,  page  5,  is  no  less  positive  that  this  an- 
cient family  is  descended  from  Alexander,  second  son  to  Kenneth  Thane  of  Loch- 
r.ber,  and  immediate  younger  brother  to  Banquo,  ancestor  to  the  royal  family  of 
Stewart.  But,  omitting  both  these  accounts,  as  being  at  best  but  uncertain  and 
ill-founded,  I  shall  endeavour  to  give  a  genealogical  account  of  this  family, 
wherein  I  shall  advance  nothing  but  what  is  well  supported,  either  by  public 
papers,  private  charters,  or  some  other  authentic  documents. 

I.  It  is  then  very  certain  that  Arkill,  one  of  the  ancestors  of  this  ancient 
familv,  and  the  firSt  of  them  1  can  find,  as  in  Mr  Crawfurd's  peerage,  was  contem- 
porary with  King  Malcolm  Canmore,  about  a?ino  1060,  and  he  seems  to  have  been 
at  that  time  a  person  of  considerable  note.    - 

II.  His  son  Aluin  M' Arkill,  or  Alvinus  filhis ■  ArhU,  as  he  is  designed  in  old 
writs,  made  a  very  great  figure  at  court  in  the  reign  of  King  St  David,  anno^ 
1 124  ;  for  there  is  scarce  a  public  charter  granted  in  all  that  reign  in  which  he  is  not 
inserted  a  witness,  as  will  easily  appear  to  any  that  will  give  themselves  the  trouble 
of  perusing  the  chartularies  of  Glasgow  and  Dunfermline,  or  Sir  James  Dal- 
rymple's  Historical  Collections. 

UI.  Aluin  M'Arkill's  son  and  successor,  called  also  Ahdn,  was  made  Earl  of 
Lennox,  by  King  William  the  Lion,  upon  the  resignation  of  David  Earl  of  Hunt- 
ingdon, the  said  king's  brother.  This  Earl  Aluin  was,  according  to  the  supersti- 
tious devotion  of  those  times,  a  very  liberal  benefactor  to  the  church;  for  he  gave 
in  pure  alms  to  the  church  of  Kilpatrick,  in  honour  of  St  Patrick,  the  lands 
of  Cochnach,  Edinbernane,  Dalmenach,  Craigintalloch,  Finbertbellach,  &.c.  with 
a  great  deal  of  other  lands  j  as  is  evident  by  a  charter  still  extant  in  the  register 
.3 


APPENDIX.  59 

of  Dumbarton.  He  left  issue  two  sons,  IMalduin  his  successor  in  the  earldom, 
(whose  male  issue  failed  in  three  descents  ;  and  the  estate  of  Lennox,  instead  of 
going  to  the  heir-male,  Malcolm  Macfarlane  of  Arroquhar,  went  by  an  heiress  to 
Walter  Lord  of  Faslane)  and  Gilchrist,  ancestor  to  the  Laird  of  Macfarlane. 

IV.  Which  Gilchrist  obtained,  by  the  grant  of  his  brother  Malduin  Earl  of 
Lennox,  "  Terras  de  superiori  Arrochar  de  Luss,  jacentes  intra  rivulos  qui  vocan- 
"  tur  Aldyvach,  &•  Aldanchulin,  ex  una  parte,  8<.  rivulos  qui  vocantur  Hernan, 
"  Hinys,  &-  Trostan  ex  altera  parte,  una  cum  insulis  de  Elanvow,  Elanvanow, 
"  Elanrouglass,  &•  Elaig  :"  Which  land,  so  bounded  together  with  the  said  islands, 
is  still  in  the  possession  of  his  posterity  to  this  day.  This  Gilchrist  is  a  frequent 
witness  to  charters  granted  by  his  brother,  Malduin  Earl  of  Lennox,  to  his  vassals ; 
particularly  to  one  granted  to  Anselan  Macbeth  Laird  of  Buchanan,  of  the 
isle  of  Clareinch  in  Loch-Lomond,  dated  anno  1225;  and  to  another  granted  to 
William,  son  of  Arthur  Galbraitli,  of  the  two  Carucates  of  Baldernock,  dated  at 
Fintray,  anno  1238. 

V.  Gilchrist's  son  and  successor  was  Duncax,  who  is  designed  in  old  charters 
Dune  anus  films  Gilchrifl,  ox  M'GilcbriJl,  which  is  one  and  the  same  ;  he  got  a  char- 
ter of  confirmation  of  the  said  lands  of  Arroquhar,  from  his  cousin  Malcolm  Earl  of 
Lennox,  whereby  the  earl  ratifies  and  confirms,  "  Donationem  illain  quam  Mal- 
"  duinus  avus  meus  fecit  Gilchrist  fratri  suo  de  terris  de  superiori  Arrochar  de 
"  Luss,  coram  his  testibus  Domino  Simone  Flandrense,  Domino  Duncano  filio 
"  Amelick,  Domino  Henrico  de  Vetere  Ponte,  &  Malcolmo  de  Drumeth."  This 
charter,  though  it  wants  a  date,  (which  is  very  usual  in  the  oldest  charters)  yet 
by  the  witnesses  it  seems  to  have  been  granted  before  anno  1284  :  Roth  this  char- 
ter and  the  original  one  granted  to  Gilchrist  are,  a  long  time  after  this,  ratified  by 
King  James  I.  under  the  Great  Seal.  {Charta  in  Rotidis  Jacohi  Primi.)  This 
Duncan  is  one  of  the  subcribers  to  that  famous  bend  of  submission,  by  the  lords 
and  barons  of  Scotland,  to  Edward  I.  of  England,  commonly  called  Rahman's 
Roll,  anno  1296  ;  and  he  is  therein  designed  Duncanus  filius  Gilchrist  de  Levenax. 
I'lde  Prynne,  page  658.  Pecia  29.  He  is  also  witness  in  a  charter  granted  by 
Malcolm  Earl  of  Lennox  to  Michael  M'Kessan,  of  the  lands  of  Garchell  and  Bal- 
lat.  He  married  his  own  cousin  Matilda,  daughter  to  the  Earl  of  Lennox,  by 
whom  he  had  Malduin  his  successor. 

VI.  Which  Malduin,  togetlier  with  his  friend  Malcolm  Earl  of  Lennox,  were 
the  constant  companions  of  King  Robert  Bruce  in  all  his  adversity ;  and  that 
king,  by  their  means,  found  a  safe  retreat  in  the  Lennox,  even  when  his  for- 
tune was  at  the  lowest  ebb,  and  when  almost  all  his  other  subjects  had  deserted 
him,  and  traiterously  taken  part  with  the  King  of  England,  and  his  vassal  John 
Baliol. 

VII.  Malduin  was  succeeded  by  his  son  Bartholomew,  or  Parlan,  as  he  is 
called  in  the  Irish  language  ;  from  which  proper  name  of  Farlan  his  posterity 
have  ever  since,  according  to  the  custom  in  the  Highlands,  obtained  the  patro- 
nimical  surname  of  Macfarlane,  i.  e.  the  son  of  Parian  01  Bartholomew. 

VIII.  Malcolm  Macfarlane,  as  he  is  designed  in  the  two  following  charters, 
succeeded  his  father  Bartholomew,  and  obtained  from  Donald  Earl  of  Lennox, 
upon  the  resignation  of  his  father  Bartholomew,  son  of  Malduin,  a  charter  of  con- 
firmation of  the  said  lands  and  islands,  in  as  ample  manner  as  his  predecessors 
held  the  same,  as  the  charter  itself,  yet  extant,  expressly  bears:  "  Adeo, 
"  libere,  plenarie,  quiete,  &.  honorifice,  in  omnibus  et  per  omnia,  sicut  char- 
"  ta  originalis  facta  per  antecessores  nostros,  antecessoribus  dicti  Malcolmi, 
"  plenius  in  se  proportat  St  testatur,  hiis  testibus  Malcolmo  Fleming  Comite  de 
"  Wigton,  Joanne  Steuart  de  Dernly,  Patricio  Fleeming  de  Weddal,  militibus, , 
"  &.C.  "  Vide  Register  of  Dumbarton.  This  charter  seems,  by  the  witnesses,  to 
have  been  granted  about  the  year  1344.  He  got  also  from  the  said  earl  another 
charter,  dated  at  Bellach  May  4th  1354,  whereby  the  earl  freely  discharges  him 
and  his  heirs  of  four  merks  of  feu-duty,  payable  yearly  out  of  his  said  lands,   and 

that  not  only  for  bygones,  but  even  also  for  the  time  to  come.     He  married 

daughter  to  by  whom    he  had 

Duncan  Macfarlane  of  Arroquhar,  his  successor. 

Vol.  II.  4  Y. 


6o  APPENDIX. 

IX.  Which  Duncan  obtiiined  from  his  cousin  Duncan  Earl  of  Lennox  a  charter 
of  confirmation  of  the  above  lands,  dated  at  the  Plarl's  mansion-house  of  Inchmirin, 
in  the  year  1^95;  in  which  charter  the  Earl  designs  him,  "  Dilectus  St  specialis 
"  noster  Duncanus  Macfarlane,  filius  £t  haeres  quondam  Malcolmi  Macfarlane  do- 
"  mini  de  Arrochar  :"  The  witnesses  to  this  charter  are  Walter  Buchanan  of  that- 
11k,  Humphrey  Colquhoun,  first  of  that  surname.  Laird  of  Luss,  Niel  of  Balnory, 
Duncan  Campbell  ot  Gaunan,  and  Malcolm  M' Alpine,  llde  Chartulary  of  Dum- 
barton. He  married  Christian  Campbell,  daughter  to  Sir  Colin  Campbell  of 
Lochow,  ancestor  to  the  Duke  of  Argyle,  as  is  evident  by  a  liferent  charter  still 
extant  in  the  above-cited  Register  of  Dumbarton,  granted  by  the  said  Duncan 
Macfarlane  in  favours  of  Christian  Campbell,  daughter  of  Sir  Colin  Campbell  of 
Lochow  his  wife,  of  the  lands  of  Keanlochlong,  Inverioch,  Glenluin,  Fortcable, 
b^c.  before  these  witnesses,  John  Campbell,  Dean  of  Argyle,  Duncan  Canipbell  of 
Gaunan,  John  M'Colman,  &-.  This  charter  is  also  dated  in  the  year  1395.  He 
had  by  the  above  lady  John  Macfarlane  his  successor. 

X.  John  succeeded,  and  is  witness  to  a  charter  granted  in  the  year  1426.  He 
married  Jean,  daughter  to  Sir  Adam  Mure  of  Rowallan,  by  whom  he  had 

XI.  Duncan  Macfarlane  of  that  Ilk,  his  successor,  who  was  served  heir  to  hi^ 

father,  January  i8th    1441.     He  married daughter  to 

by  whom  he  had 

XU.  Walterus  Macfarlane  Dominus  de  Arrochar,  who  is  to  be  met  with  under 
King  James  111.  and  is  so  designed  in  a  charter  granted  to  the  burgh  of  Dumbar- 
ton m  the  year  i486.     He  married Livingston,  only  daughter  to 

James  Lord  Livingston. 

XIII.  His  successor  was  Andrew  Macfarlane  of  that  Ilk,  who  is  witness  in  a 
charter  belonging  to  the  said  burgh  of  Dumbarton,  ad  annum  1493.  He  married 
a  daughter  of  Stewart  Earl  of  Lennox,  by  whom  he  had  Sir  John  Macfarlane  of 
that  Ilk  his  successor. 

XIV.  Sir  John  in  a  charter  he  gives  of  the  lands  of  Garrowstuck  to  one  William 
Macfarlane,  is  thus  designed,  "  Honorabihs  var  Joannes  Macfarlane  dominus  ejus- 
"  dem,  miles,  Capitaneus  de  Clan-Pharlan."     He  was  slain  in  anno  1513,  at  the 

tafal  battle  of  Flodden.     He   married  first daughter  to  James  Lord 

Hamilton,  by  whom  he  had  Andrew  his  successor,  and  Robert  Macfarlane,  first  of 
the  branch  of  Innersnait  :  He  married,  ^dly,  A  daughter  of  the  Lord  Herries,  by 
V. hom  he  had  W'alter  Macfarlane  of  Ardleish,  ancestor  to  the  family  of  Gartar- 
tan. 

XV.  Sir  John  Macfarlane  of  that  Ilk  was  succeeded  by  his  son  Andrew,  who 
married  Lady  Margaret  Cunningham,  daughter  to  WiUiam  Earl  of  Glencairn,  who 
was  Lord  High  Treasurer  in  the  reign  of  King  James  V.  Sir  James  Balfour,  in  his 
Genealogical  Collections  on  the  Scots  Nobility,  says,  "  She  was  the  only  daughter 
"  of  Cuthbert  Earl  of  Glencairn,  by  Lady  Marion  Douglas  his  wife,  eldest  daugh- 
"  ter  to  the  Earl  of  Angus."  He  had  by  her  Duncan  Macfarlane  of  that  Ilk,  his 
successor,  who  succeeded  his  father. 

XVI.  Which  Duncan,  by  reason  of  his  near  relation  to  that  family,  was  a  con- 
stant adherent  to  Matthew  Earl  of  Lennox,  whom  he  frequently  assisted  even  to 
The  endangering  of  his  own  life  and  fortune  ;  particularly  in  the  year  1544,  he 
joined  the  Earls  of  Lennox  and  Glencairn  with  300  men  of.  his  own  surname,  and 
was  present  with  them  at  the  unlucky  fight  on  Glasgow  Muir,  for  which  he  was 
forfeited ;  but  being,  by  the  intercession  of  his  friends,  soon  afterwards  restored,  he 
obtained  a  remission  under  the  Privy-Seal,  which  is  still  extant.  The  loss  of  this 
battle  obliged  the  Earl  of  Lennox,  with  several  ot  his  friends,  to  withdraw  to 
England,  where  the  Earl  having  married  Lady  Margaret  Douglas,  niece  to  King 
Henry  VIII.  got  some  English  forces  to  assist  him  from  that  monarch.  Imme- 
diately upon  his  return,  the  Laird  of  Macfarlane,  not  daring  to  appear  for  him 
himself  in  person,  sent  nevertheless  to  his  assistance  140  well  armed  men,  com- 
manded by  his  own  near  relation  Walter  Macfarlane  of  Tarbet,  who  were  very 
serviceable  to  the  Earl  in  all  that  expedition,  particularly  in  taking  in  the  Isles  of 
Bute  and  Arran,  burning  the  castles  of  Rothsay  and  Dunoon,  defeating  the  Earl  of 
Argyle,  &-C.  As  is  testified  by  Ralph  Hollinshed,  in  his  History  of  Scotland, 
page  463,  where,  speaking  of  these  actions  of  the  Earl  of  Lennox,  he  writes  thus, 


APPENDIX.  61 

"  In  these  exploytes  the  Erie  had  with  him  Walter  M'Farlane  of  Tarbet,  and 
"  seven  score  ot  men  of  the  head  of  Lennox,  that  spake  bothe  Irishe  and  the 
"  English  Scottish  tongues,  light  footmen  well  armed  in  shirtes  of  mayle,  with 
"  bows  and  two-handed  swords;  and  being  joined  with  the  English  archers  and 
"  shotte,  did  much  avayleable  service  in  the  streyghts,  maribhes,  and  mountaync 
"  countries."  This  Duncan  was  afterwards  slain,  together  with  a  great  number  of 
his  clan,  valiantly  fighting  against  the  English  at  the  fatal  battle  of  Pinky,  Sep- 
tember 10.  1547.  He  married,  first,  Isabel  Stewart,  daughter  to  Stewart  Lord 
Ochiltree;  and,  secondly,  Anne,  daughter  to  Sir  John  Colquhoun  of  Iaiss,  and  was 
succeeded  by  his  son  Andrew  Macfarlane  of  that  Ilk. 

XVII.  Andrew  was  a  zealous  and  hearty  promoter  of  the  Reformation,  and 
one  of  the  first  in  the  Highlands,  of  any  account,  who  threw  oft"  the  superstitions  of 
popery,  and  made  open  profession  of  the  Protestant  religion;  in  defence  of  w^hich 
he  made  several  signal  appearances,  particularly  at  the  famous  battle  of  Langside, 
foughten  May  10.  1568.  At  which  battle  the  Earl  of  Murray,  who  was  then  re- 
gent, being  almost  overpowered  by  tlie  number  of  Queen  Mary's  forces,  and  his 
army  ready  to  give  way,  the  Laird  of  Macfarlane  came  in  very  seasonably  to  his 
assistance,  in  the  very  brunt  of  the  battle,  with  a  considerable  supply  of  300  men, 
with  whom  he  attacked  the  right  wing  of  the  queen's  army  so  furiously  that  they 
were  immediately  obliged  to  quit  their  ground,  and  betake  themselves  to  their 
heels,  and  were  soon  followed  by  the  rest  of  the  army.  Which  passage  is  thus  re- 
lated by  the  above-cited  Hollinshed,  page  506.  "  In  this  battayle  the  valiancie 
"  of  an  Hie-land  gentle-man  named  M'Farlane,  stood  the  Regent's  part  in  great 
"  steede;  for  in  the  hottest  brunte  of  the  fight,  he  came  in  with  three  hundred  of 
"  his  friendes  and  countrymen,  and  so  manfully  gave  in  upon  the  flanke  of  the 
"  queen's  people,  that  he  was  a  great  cause  of  the  disordering  of  them."  He  took 
at  this  battle  three  of  Queen  Mary's  standards,  which  were  for  a  long  time  pre- 
served in  the  family :  Neither  was  the  regent  insensible  of  the  service  the  Laird  of 
Macfarlane  did  him  at  this  battle;  for,  amongst  other  rewards,  he  gave  him  that 
honourable  crest  and  motto,  which  is  still  enjoyed  by  his  posterity,  and  recorded  in 
the  Lyon  Register,  viz.  a  demi-savage,  proper,  holding  in  his  dexter  hand  a  sheaf 
of  arrows,  and  pointing  with  his  sinister  to  an  imperial  crown  or:  motto.  This  Fll 
defend;  and  ever  since  that  time  (if  not  before  this)  the  family  have  been  in  use  to 
carry  for  supporters  as  above ;  as  is  to  be  seen  on  the  castle  of  Islandvow,  built  in 
the  year  1577,  ty  the  said  Andrew.  He  married  Agnes  Maxwell,  daughter  of 
Sir  Patrick  Maxwell  of  Newark,  by  whom  he  had  John  Macfarlane  of  that  Ilk  his 
successor, 

XVIII.  Who  married,  first,  Susanna  Buchanan,  daughter  to  Sir  George  Bu- 
chanan of  that  Ilk,  sans  issue ;  secondly,  he  married  Helen,  daughter  to  Francis 
Stewart  Earl  of  Bothwell,  by  whom  he  had  Walter  his  successor;  thirdly,  he  mar- 
ried Elizabeth,  daughter  to  the  Earl  of  Argyle;  fourthly,  he  married  Margaret, 
daughter  to  James  Murray  of  Struan. 

XIX.  His  son  and  successor  Walter  Macfarlane  of  that  Ilk  suffered  very 
much  for  his  loyalty  and  constant  adherence  to  his  sovereign  King  Charles  I.  and 
was  for  that  cause  twice  besieged  in  his  own  house  during  Cromwell's  usurpation; 
and  at  the  same  time  one  of  his  houses,  called  the  castle  of  Inverouglass,  was 
burnt  to  the  ground  by  the  English,  and  in  it  several  ancient  writs  belonging  to 
the  family.  He  married  Margaret,  daughter  to  Sir  James  Semple  of  Beltrees,  one 
of  the  Gentlemen  of  the  Bed-Chamber  to  his  Maje'-ty  King  James  VI.  and  had 
by  her  John  his  successor,  and  Andrew  Macfarlane  of  Ardess,  who  succeeded  his 
brother. 

Which  John  married  Grissel,  daughter  to  Sir  Colin  Lament  of  that  Ilk,  by  Bar- 
bara his  wife,  daughter  to  Robert  Lord  Semple:  But  having  no  male  issue,  his 
fortune  went  to  his  brother 

XX.  Andrew  Macfarlane  of  that  Ilk,  who  married  EHzabeth,  daughter  to 
John  Buchanan  of  Drumakill,  and  had  by  her  John  Macfarlane  of  that  Ilk  his 
successor. 

XXI.  Which  John  married  Helen,  daughter  to  Robert  Lord  Viscount  of  Ar- 
buthnot,  by  whom  he  had 

XXII.  Walter  Macfarlane,  now  of  that  Ilk,  his  successor. 


62  APPENDIX. 


ANSTRUTHER  of  Anstruther. 


THE  family  of  Anstruther  have  probably  assumed  their  surname  from  their 
own  lands,  or  from  the  town  of  that  name,  of  »vhich  they  are  proprietors. 

This  ancient  family  hatli  long  flourished  in  the  county  of  Fife;  for  we  find  in 
the  (ii)  cliartulary  of  the  abbacy  of  Balmerino,  which  was  founded  by  David  Earl 
of  Huntingdon,  brother  to  King  William,  that  WiUielmus  de  Candda  Dominus  de 
Alutroither  gave  to  the  monks,  "  Ibidem  Deo  servientibus,  &  in  perpetuum  ser- 
"  vituris,  quandam  terram  adjacentem  ex  parte  orientali  villffi  de  Anstroither,"  on 
the  sca-coasl,  by  the  way  leading  to  Crail. 

{h\  To  this  William  succeeded  Henry  his  son,  who  is  designed  Henricus  Jilius 
WtUielmi  de  Candela  Dominus  de  Anstroither,  when  he  confirms  to  the  monks  of 
Balmerino  his  father's  donation,  in  the  7th  year  of  the  reign  of  King  Alexander  II. 
anno  1221. 

The  successor  of  this  Henry  was  another  Henry,  who,  we  find,  was  one  of  the 
freeholders  of  the  county  of  Fife,  that  {c)  took  an  oath  of  submission  to  King 
Edward  I.  of  England,  when  John  Baliol,  then  King  of  Scotland,  had  subjected 
this  kingdom  to  that  prince,  anno  i2()i  (d).  He  was  a  benefactor  to  the  abbacy 
ot  Dryburgh,  for  he  confirmed,  "  Deo  &-  ecclesiiB  Sanctae  Maria?  de  Dryburgh, 
"  &.  monachis  ibidem  Deo  servientibus,  illas  tres  bothas  in  villa  mea  de  An- 
"  stroither,  quas  bona-  memoriEe  Henricus  pater  mens  ipsis  canonicis  in  villa  sua 
"  dedit  &.  concessit." 

({■)  William  was  the  son  of  this  Henry  ;  he  likewise  ratified  to  the  monks  of 
Dryburgh  these  three  booths  that  had  been  confirmed  by  Henry  his  father.  This 
was  confirmed  by  William  Lamberton  Bishop  of  St  Andrews. 

(/)  A  third  Henry  succeeded  to  this  William,  who  ratified  to  the  monks  of 
Dryburgh,  "  Quasdam  bothas  in  villa  mea  de  Anstroither,  quas  quidem  bothas 
"  iiabuerunt  ibidem  ex  donatione  St.  confirmatione  Henrici  Sc  Willielmi,  quondam 
"  predeccssorum  meorum  ab  antiquo,  testibus  Thoma  Ranulphi  Comite  Moraviae, 
"  David  de  Weerayss  Domino  ejusdem,  cummultis  aliis."  Thomas  Randolph  Earl 
of  Murray  was  Governor  of  Scotland  in  the  minority  of  David  II.  and  died  in  the 
year  1332  (^).  David  de  Weemyss  was  one  of  those  that  sent  a  letter  to  the  pope, 
dated  6th  April  132c,  asserting  the  liberty  and  independency  of  the  crown  and 
kingdom  of  Scotland. 

To  Henry  succeeded  Richard  de  Anstroither  Dominus  loci  ejusdem  (h).  He  gave 
to  John  Strang,  and  the  heirs  begot  betwixt  him  and  Cecilia  his  spouse,  sister  to 
Richard,  seven  acres  of  land  lying  upon  the  north  side  of  the  lands  belonging  to 
the  Abbot  of  Dryburgh,  within  the  territory  of  Anstruther.  This  donation  was 
confirmed  by  King  David  II.  (i)  at  St  Andrews,  the  24th  April,  the  33d  year  of 
his  reign,  anno  1362,  "  Testibus  venerabili  in  Christo  patre  Patricio  episcopo 
"  Brichensi  Cancellario  nostro,  Roberto  senescallo  Scocie  Comite  de  Stratherne 
"  nepote  nostro,  Willielmo  de  Keth  mariscallo  nostro  Scocie,  Roberto  de  Eriskyne 
"  Camerario  nostro,  &-  Archibaldo  de  Douglas  militibus." 

Anstruther. 

Robert  Anstruther  was  married  to  Isabel  Balfour. 

(k)  The  next  we  find  is  Andrew  Anstruther.  He  had  a  charter  under  the 
Great  Seal  of  the  lands  of  Anstruther,  on  his  own  resignation  in  the  year  1483. 
He  ii;arried  Christian  Sandilands,  a  daughter  of  the  family  of  Calder  in  Linhthgow- 
shire,  ancestor  to  the  Lord  Torphichen.  He  was  killed  in  the  service  of  his  coun- 
try at  the  battle  of  Flodden  the  9th  September  1513. 

(/)  John  Anstruther,  son  to  Andrew,  Had  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal  to 
himself,  and  to  Margaret  Douglas  his  spouse,  of  lands  in  conjunct  fee,  anno  1520. 

(fl)  Chartulary  of  Balmerino  in  the  Library  of  the  Faculty  of  Advocates  at  Edinburgh,  {i)  Ibidem. 
(c)  Rymei's  Fcedera  Anglia:,  and  Prynne's  History.  ((/)  Chartulary  of  Dryburgh,  in  the  Library  of 
the  Faculty  of  Advocates  at  Edinburgh,  (e)  Ibidem.  (/)  Ibidem,  {g)  Cliarta  penes  Coniitem  de 
Haddington.  (A)  Charta  penes  Dorainum  Joannem  Anstruther  de  eodem.  (/)  Ibidem,  {i)  In  pub- 
licis  aichivis.     {/)  Ibidem. 


APPENDIX.  63: 

This  lady  was  a  daughter  of  the  House  of  Lochleven,  the  ancestor  of  the  present 
Earl  of  Morton.  He  was  married  afterwards  to  Elizabeth  Spence,  daughter  to 
Spence  of  Wolmerston,  an  ancient  family  in  the  east  of  Fife  that  is  now  extinct. 

(/«)  Andrew,  his  son,  had  a  charter  from  his  father,  of  a  provision  out  of  the 
estate  to  himself,  and  to  Margaret  Abercromby  his  wife  ;  she  was  daughter  of 
Thomas  Abercromby  of  Abercromby,  an  ancient  and  considerable  family  in  the 
county  of  Fife,  now  extinct.  He  was  killed  at  the  battle  of  Pinky  the  loth  Sep- 
tember 1547. 

(/;)  John  Anstruther  succeeded  to  his  grandfather  John.  He  married  Mar- 
garet Clephane,  daughter  of  George  Clephane  of  Carslogie,  in  the  county  of  Fife, 
by  whom   he   had  Sir  James,  of  whom   afterwards,  and   a  daughter,   married  to 

Forrest  of  Fingask.     He  married  to  his  second  wife  Margaret  Learmonth, 

daughter  of Learmonth  of  Dairsie,  and  widow  of  Spence  of  Wolmerston. 

He  died  anno  1610. 

(0)  Sir  J,\MES  Anstruther  had  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal,  upon  the  resig- 
nation of  his  father,  anno  1583.  (/<)  He  was  made  Carver  to  Kmg  James  VI.  in 
the  year  1585,  (9)  and  was  constituted  one  of  the  Master-Households  anno  1592, 
with  all  the  salaries,  profits,  and  privileges  belonging  to  these  posts,  which  are  he- 
reditary in  the  family.  In  the  year  1571  he  married  Jean  Scott,  daughter  to 
Thomas  Scott  of  Abbotshall,  who  was  a  son  of  the  House  of  Balwyrie  in  the 
county  of  Fife,  and  was  Justice-Clerk  in  the  reign  of  King  James  V.  By  her  he 
had  two  sons,  William  and  Robert,  and  several  daughters;  one  of  them,  Jean,  was 
married  to  James  Douglas,  Commendator  of  Melrose,  second  son  of  William  Earl 
of  Morton.     Sir  James  died  in  the  year  1606. 

(/■)  Sir  William  Anstruther,  his  eldest  son,  succeeded  him  in  his  estate  and 
office,  and  was  made  one  of  the  Gentlemen  of  the  Bed-Chamber  to  King  James  VI. 
Upon  his  Majesty's  accession  to  the  English  throne  he  accompanied  him  into  that 
kingdom,  (j-)  and  was  created  a  Knight  of  the  Bath  at  the  king's  coronation  anno 
1603.  King  Charles  I.  had  such  regard  to  the  long  and  faithful  services  of  Sir 
William  Anstruther,  that  hewas  pleased  to  continue  him  in  the  Bed-Chamber  after 
the  death  of  King  James.  He  married  Euphame,  daughter  of  Sir  Andrew  Wemyss 
of  Myrecairny,  a  Lord  of  the  Session,  and  died  in  the  year  1649,  leaving  no  law- 
ful issue. 

Sir  Robert  Anstruther,  second  son  to  Sir  James  Anstruther,  and  brother  to 
Sir  Wilham,  was  one  of  the  Gentlemen  of  the  Privy-Chamber  to  King  Charles  I. 
This  gentleman  was  employed  in  several  honourable  embassies,  both  by  King 
James  and  his  son  King  Charles,  and  likewise  by  Frederick  King  of  Bohemia.  In 
1620  {t)  King  James  sent  him  ambassador  extroardinary  to  Christian,  King  of 
Denmark,  {u)  In  the  year  1627  he  was  sent  ambassador  by  King  Charles  I.  to 
the  Emperor  and  States  of  Germany  that  were  to  meet  at  Nuremberg,  (x)  The 
same  King,  and  Frederick  King  of  Bohemia,  and  Elector  Palatine,  gave  him  a 
commission  to  be  their  ambassador  and  plenipotentiary  at  the  meeting  of  the  Diet 
at  Ratisbon.  In  the  year  1630  he  was  sent  also  ambassador  from  King  Charles  I. 
to  the  meeting  of  the  Princes  of  Germany  at  Hailbrun.  He  married  Katharine, 
daughter  of  Sir  Edward  Swift,  knight,  of  the  county  of  York,  and  of  Ursilla  his 

wife,  daughter  of Danby  of  Masbam,  Esq.  and  sister  to  the  Lord  Viscount 

Carlingford,  by  whom  he  had  two  sons,  Robert  and  Philip,  and  a  daughter,  Eliza- 
beth, married  to Austen,  Esq.  near  Guilford. 

Robert  succeeded  his  father  Sir  Robert  in  his  estate  of  Whetly  in  Yorkshire; 
He  married  Anne,  daughter  of  Sir  John  Corbet  of  Stoke  in  Shropshire,  but  died 
without  issue-male. 

Sir  Philip  Anstruther,  second  son  to  Sir  Robert  the  ambassador,  succeeded  his 
uncle  Sir  William  in  his  estate  and  offices  in  Scotland.  When  King  Charles  II. 
Game  to  Scotland  from  Breda  in  1650,  he  was  very  zealous  to  advance  his  majesty's 
service  all  he  could.     He  had  "a  command  in  the  royal  army  when  they  marched 


(m)  In  publicis  archivis.  (»;)  Charta  penes  Dominum  Joannem  Anstruther.     (0)  Ibidem.    (/>)  Ibidem, 

(y)  Ibidem,      (r)  Ibidem,  (j)  Anstis's  History  of  the  Order  of  the  Bath.     (0  Charta  penes  Dominum 

Joannem  Anstruther,     (k)  Ibidem,     (.v)  Ibidem. 

Vol.  U.  4  Z 


64  APPENDIX. 

into  Engkirid,  and  was  taken  prisoner  at  the  battle  of  Worcester;  for  vvliich  hi. 
estate  was  sequestrated,  until  the  Restoration  of  the  King  in  1660.  He  inanied 
Christian,  daughter  of  Major-General  Lumsden  of  Innergelly,  who  served  with 
honour  in  the  wars  of  Germany,  under  the  command  of  Gustavus  Adolphus  King 
of  Sweden,  by  whom  he  had  Sir  William  his  heir. 

Sir  James  Anstrutuer  of  Audrie,  an  Advocate  and  Principal  Clerk  to  the  Bills. 

He  married  Katharnie,  daughter  of Skene   of  Halyards,  by  whom  he 

had  Philip  Anstruther,  colonel  of  a  regiment  of  foot  in  his  majesty's  service,  and  a 
daughter.  Christian. 

Sn-  RoBHRT  Anstruther  of  Balcaskie,  the  third  son,  was  married  to  the  heiress 
of  Kinnear,  in  the  county  of  Fife.  He  married,  to  his  second  wife,  Jean  Monteith, 
heiress  of  Wrae  in  Linlithgowshire,  by  whom  he  had  six  sons  and  two  daughters. 
First,  Philip,  an  advocate,  and  one  of  the  principal  clerks  to  the  bills.  Second, 
William,  a  captain  in  Brigadier-General  Preston's  regiment;  he  was  killed  in  1715, 
when  General  Willis  attacked  the  rebels  at  Preston,  and  forced  them  to  surrender. 
Third,  Robert,  a  Captain  in  Colonel  Anstruther's  regiment.  Fourth,  George,  a 
lieutenant  in  the  same  regiment.  Fifth,  John,  who  died  young,  and  Alexander, 
who  died  an  ensign  in  Brigadier-General  Preston's  regiment.  His  eldest  daughter. 
Christian,  is  married  to  Sir  John  Henderson  of  Fordell,  and  Jean,  to  James  M'Gill 
of  Ranlieillor.  His  third  wife  is  Marion  Preston,  daughter  to  Sir  William  Preston 
of  Valleyfield,  by  whom  he  has  Charles,  and  several  daughters. 

Sir  Philip  Anstruther  had  to  his  fourth  son  Sir  Philip,  who  was  a  captain  in 
the  Earl  of  TuUibaidin's  regiment.  He  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  to,  and  co- 
heir of,  James  Hamilton  of  Mountainhall.  He  died  in  1722,  and  left  Philip,  a 
captain  in  Colonel  Anstruther's  regiment.  Christian,  married  to  Sir  William  Weir 
of  Blackwood,  Jean,  and  Elizabeth. 

Sir  Alex.\nder  Anstruther,  the  youngest  son,  is  one  of  the  Principal  Clerks  to 
the  Bills.  He  married  Jean  Leslie,  eldest  daughter  and  heir,  both  to  the  estate 
and  honour,  of  David  Lord  Newark,  by  whom  he  has  William. Leslie,  David  and 
Alexander  Anstruthers,  and  several  daughters. 

Sir  Philip  died  in  1702,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  eldest  son  Sir  William.  He 
was  chosen  member  of  Parliament  in  the  year  1681,  when  the  Duke  of  York  was 
his  Majesty's  High  Commissioner,  and  joined  with  other  patriots  in  opposing  the 
arbitrary  measures  that  were  taken  at  that  time.  He  heartily  concurred  with  the 
Revolution,  when  he  saw  our  religion,  laws,  and  liberties,  in  danger  of  being  over- 
turned. Soon  after  the  Revolution  he  was  constituted,  by  King  William  and  Q^ieen 
Mary,  one  of  the  Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice,  and  one  of  the  Commissioners  of 
the  Court  of  Justiciary,  and  some  time  after  was  made  one  of  his  Majesty's  most 
honourable  Privy  Council  and  Exchequer.  He  exerted  himself  with  a  great 
deal  of  zeal  in  promoting  the  union  with  England,  with  a  design  to  get  the  suc- 
cession to  the  crown  settled  upon  the  illustrious  House  of  Hanover.  He  died  in 
1711,  and  left  by  Lady  Helen  Hamilton,  his  wife,  daughter  of  John  Earl  of  Had- 
dington, one  son,  John. 

Sir  John  Anstruther  of  Anstruther  was  chosen  member  of  Parliament  in  the 
year  1703,  and  hath  been  returned  a  member  of  Parliament  ever  since  the  union, 
except  the  first  session,  when  the  representatives  for  Scotland  were  chosen  by  Par- 
liament. He  gave  convincing  proofs  of  his  zeal  for  the  Protestant  succession  in 
the  present  illustrious  family,  by  his  behaviour  in  the  British  Parliament  before 
the  year  1714,  and  by  his  serving  as  a  volunteer,  with  other  persons  of  quality, 
when,  the  rebellion  broke  out  in  1715.  In  January  1717  he  married  Lady  Mar- 
garet Carmichael,  eldest  daughter  of  James  Earl  of  Hyndford,  who  died  in  172 1, 
leaving  three  children,  Helen,  John,  and  James;  this  James  died  soon  after  his 
mother. 

A  younger  son  of  the  family  of  Anstruther  entered  into  the  French  service,  and 
settled  in  that  kingdom,  v/here  their  posterity  still  remain;  but  at  what  time  this 
happened  is  very  uncertain. 

The  arms  of  the  family  are  to  be  seen  blazoned  in  the  First  Volume,  page  2.01. 
?.nd  are  engraved  in. the  Plates  of  Achievements,  Plate  IX. 
3 


APPENDIX. 


BIRNIE  OF  THAT  Ilk. 


Mr.  JOHN  BIRNIE  of  Broomhill,  great-grandson  and  representative  of  William 
Birnie  of  tliat  Ilk,  has  beside  him  a  Seanachie's  tradition  of  that  family  written. 
That  in  the  year  of  God  838,  or  thereby,  Alpine  King  of  Scots,  with  many  of  his 
prime  men,  being  taken  prisoners  in  battle  by  the  Picts,  and  thereafter  murdered 
in  cold  blood,  and  the  King's  head,  in  a  base  manner,  set  on  a  pole  in  one  ot  their 
chief  cities,  Kenneth  II.  his  son,  a  brave  prince,  soon  raised  an  army  to  be  re- 
venged on  the  actors  of  so  barbarous  a  murder. 

All  his  followers  were  desperate  and  resolute,  and  had  many  conflicts  several 
days  together,  amongst  whom  was  one  Birnie,  (an  Irish  word,  and  signifying  in 
English  bright^  so  called,  because  of  his  glittering  armour,  with  his  two  sons,  who 
having  already  several  times  signalized  themselves,  yet  one  evening  pressing  furi- 
ously into  the  thickest  of  the  Picts,  were  all  three,  with  several  others,  surrounded 
and  made  prisoners.  Night  by  this  time  putting  an  end  to  the  fight,  they  had 
each  of  them  one  leg  put  fast  in  a  pair  of  stocks  to  prevent  their  escape,  till  the 
Picts  had  more  leisure  to  put  them  to  death. 

The  father  knowing  very  well  what  would  come  of  them,  advised  the  cutting 
off  of  each  of  their  legs;  which  done,  they  made  a  shift  to  return  to  their  own 
men;  and  at  the  next  battle,  fatal  to  the  Picts,  they  were  observed  to  behave 
themselves  with  a  new  courage,  wherewith  the  loss  of  their  legs  had  animated 
them. 

The  fortune  of  the  Scots  at  length  prevailing,  this  King  Kenneth,  in  his  just 
revenge,  laid  not  aside  his  arms,  until  he  had  extirpated  the  whole  nation  of  the 
Picts.  Their  possessions  he  divided  amongst  his  men,  as  they  best  deserved,  and 
upon  Birnie  he  bestowed  a  barony  of  land  near  Elgin,  in  the  shire  of  Murray,  yet 
bearing  his  name,  and  which  his  posterity  enjoyed  for  a  long  time  thereafter,  and 
gave  them  for  their  arms,  gules,  in  resemblance  of  the  late  bloody  battle,  a  fesse, 
the  mark  of  honour,  betwixt  the  how  and  arrow  in  full  draught,  the  most  an- 
cient arms  then  in  use,  and  the  three  legs  couped  at  the  thigh,  in  perpetual 
remembrance  of  their  valour ;  as  to  be  seen  among  the  Plates  of  Achievement  in 
Vol.  I.  PL  7. 

This  estate  continued  in  their  possession  till  about  the  latter  end  of  the  civil 
wars,  in  the  minority  of  King  James  VI.  the  last  whereof  was  the  above  William, 
who  married  Margaret,  daughter  to  Eraser  of  Philorth,  and,  after  Birnie's  death, 
was,  by  Q_iieen  Mary,  made  Mistress  of  the  Mint.  He  left  of  issue  only  one  son, 
Mr  William  Birnie,  who,  at  age,  and  after  three  years  study  abroad,  was,  upon  the 
28th  of  December  1597,  presented  by  King  James  VI.  to  the  church  of  Lanark, 
and  made  by  hir.,  -i^.^  h  member  of  both  the  Courts  of  High  Commission  :  In 
which  parish,  because  of  the  several  quarrels  and  feuds  amongst  the  gentlemen,  he 
not  only  learnedly  preached  the  gospel,  but  was  obliged  many  times,  as  he  well 
could,  to  make  use  of  his  sword.  He  married  Elizabeth,  a  brother's  daughter  of 
Lindsay  of  Covington,  and  had  issue,  John,  a  merchant,  who  died  without  heirs- 
male;  James,  a  merchant  in  Poland,^  and  after  secretary  to  John  Casimir  King  of 
Poland,  who  had  no  male  issue;  and  Robert,  Mr  William's  third  son,  who  was 
also,  by  presentation  from  King  Charles  I.  of  the  date  the  23d  of  November  1643, 
made  minister  at  Lanark.  He  married  Christian,  daughter  to  Dr  Patrick  Melvin, 
Professor  of  the  Oriental  Languages  at  St  Andrews,  of  the  family  of  Raith.  Tnis 
Christian  was  so  good  a  proficient  in  the  Hebrew  language,  that  she  was  able  to 
English  it  in  any  part,  even  without  points.  They  had  of  issue  one  son,  the  above 
Mr  John,  and  a  daughter,  Janet,  married  to  Mr  John  Irvine  of  Saphock,  whose  son, 
Mr  Alexander,  now  of  Saphock,  advocate,  is  the  true  heir-male  and  representative 
of  the  family  of  Drum,  and  married  Barbara,  daughter  to  Dundas  of  that  Ilk. 
Mr  John  Birnie  married  Jean,  daughter  to  James  Hamilton  of  Broomhill,  Bishop 
of  Galloway,  second  son  of  Sir  James  Hamilton  of  Broomhill,  baronet;  the  bishop's 
eldest  brother  being  John  Hamilton  the  first  Lord  Belhaven.     He  had  issue  the 


66  APPENDIX. 

present  John  Birnie  of  Broomhill,  Mr  Alexander,  an  advocate,  and  Isabel,  married 
to  George  Muirhead  of  Whitecastle. 


IRVINE  OF  Drum. 


THE  name  and  family  is  very  ancient.  Some  antiquaries  bring  the  name  Ere- 
■vlne,  now  written  Irvine,  from  the  Celto-Scythic  word  Erin-vine  or  Fein,  which 
signifies  a  stout  •westland  man  :  For  Erin,  in  the  old  Gaelic  or  Welsh,  signifieth 
ivest ;  and  J'ine  or  Fein,  a  resolute  and  worthy  man.  Ireland  is  at  this  day  called 
Erin,  both  by  its  ancient  inhabitants  and  those  of  Albion,  because  its  situation  is 
west  from  Albion. 

When  the  colonies  of  the  Gauls  came  from  the  west  coasts  of  Spain,  and 
seated  themselves  in  the  east  coasts  of  Erin,  and  in  the  west  hills  and  islands  of 
Albion,  then  the  Erevines  came  to  both  these  islands.  The  Silures  of  South 
Wales  were  of  these  colonies,  as  Tacitus  affirmeth :  And  the  Brigantes,  both  of 
Albion  and  Erin  were  of  the  same. 

Those  among  them  in  Albion,  called  Erevines,  had  their  seat  in  that  part  of  the 
country  now  called  Cunningham  ;  they  gave  their  name  to  the  river,  and  to  their 
own  habitation,  at  present  called  the  town  of  Erevine  or  Irvine.  The  chief  of 
them  was  Ahthane  of  Dule,  an  honourable  title  of  old.  John  Major  de  Gest.  Scot, 
lib.  3.  cap.  q.  relateth  that  Erevine,  the  Abthane,  married  the  only  daughter  of 
King  Malcolm  II.  who  began  to  reign  anno  1004.  He  sayeth  this  Malcolm  "  fi- 
"  liam  unigenitam  habuit  h^redem  quam  nuptui  tradidit  Eryvino  Abthano 
"  de  Dule,  id  est,  Senescallo  regis  in  insuhs  ad  colligendos  regios  proven- 
"  tus. " 

Some  of  this  family  went  to  the  south,  and  took  up  their  dwelling  upon  the 
river  Esk,  at  present  called  Castle-Irvine  or  Irvine-Hall ;  by  marriage  the  eldest 
of  the  family  there  got  the  lands  of  Bonshaw,  which  they  as  yet  possess. 

King  Robert  the  Bruce,  when  he  fled  from  Edward  Longshanks,  came  to  Bon- 
shaw, and  took  thence  the  eldest  son  of  the  family,  Sir  William  Irvine,  to  wait  on 
him  :  He  made  him  his  Secretary  and  Armour-bearer  ;  and,  because  of  his  remark- 
able fidelity  to  him  in  all  adversities,  this  king  gave  him  the  lands  of  the  Fo^ 
rest  of  Drum  ;  and,  he  himself  having  carried  as  a  private  badge  three  laurel- 
leaves,  with  these  words,  Sub  sole,  sub  umbra  virens,  he  gave  to  this  William, 
Drum's  predecessor,  for  arms,  three  holly  leaves,  which  is  a  kind  of  laurel,  with  the 
foresaid  motto.  Sub  sole,  sub  umbra  virens.  Thus  the  armorial  bearing  of  the 
family  is  argent,  three  holly  branches,  each  consisting  of  as  many  leaves  proper, 
banded  together  giiles.  The  supporters  are  two  savages  wreathed  about  head  and 
loins  with  hollies,  bearing  battons  in  their  hands.  This  is  vouched  from  the 
charters  of  the  family,  and  by  Sir  George  Mackenzie  in  his  Book  of  He- 
raldry. 

Sometime  thereafter  the  Laird  of  Drum  married  the  daughter  of  Sir  Robert 
Keith,  Knight  Marischal,  whom  he  had  by  Margaret  Hay,  daughter  to  Gilbert 
Lord  Hay,  first  Constable  of  that  family.  This  Sir  Robert  Keith  was  killed  at  the 
battle  of  Durham,  anno  1346. 

The  son  of  this  Drum,  Sir  Alexander  Irvine,  commanded  the  Lowland  forces 
at  Harlaw  in  1411,  killed  with  his  own  hand  Maclean,  a  chief  commander  of  the 
Highlanders,  and  was  there  killed  himself;  as  Hector  Boethius  relates,  saying, 
That  he  was  ob  prtecipuum  robur  conspicuus. 

His  brother,  named  also  Sir  Alex.^ndkr,  succeeded,  and  was  one  of  the  Com- 
missioners sent  by  the  Estates  of  Scotland  to  treat  anent  the  ransom  of  King 
James  I.  and  to  bring  him  home  ;  as  Hector  Boethius  and  Drummond  of  Haw- 
thornden  testify.  John  .Major,  in  his  History,  lib.  6.  cap.  12.  sayeth.  He  was. 
knighted  by  this  king  in  his  second  Parliament  holden  at  Perth:  His  words  are, 


APPENDIX.  67 

"  Ecfuitem  auratum  militari  balteo  praecinxit ; "  there  he  reckonetli  this  family 
«'  inter  veterum  familias." 

This  Sir  Alexander  married  a  daughter  of  the  Lord  Keith  Knight  Marischal, 
by  whom  he  had  Alexander,  and  another  son,  to  whom  he  gave  the  lands-- of  Red- 
mire  and  Whiterigs  in  the  Mearns,  holding  as  yet  of  Drum.  From  this  second 
son  are  descended  the  Irvines  of  Lenturk. 

Alexander  married  Abeniethy,   daughter  to   the  Lord  Salton,  by 

whom  he  had  Alexander  Irvine  of  Drum,  who  married  Katharine  Forbes,  daughter 
to  the  Lord  Forbes :  By  her  he  had  three  sons,  Alexander,  Richard  of  Craigton, 
from  whom  are  descended  the  L"vines  of  Hilton,  and  Henry,  and  a  daughter  Lady 
Wardes. 

Alex.\nder  married  Allardice,  only   daughter  to  Allardice  of  that 

Ilk  ;  by  whom  he  had  a  son,  Alexander,  and  two  daughters ;  one  married  to 
Balbegno,  and  another  to  Fraser  of  Muchil,  the  predecessor  of  the  Lord 
Fraser. 

Alexander  married  Elizabeth  Ogilvie,  daughter  to  the  Laird  of  Findlater,  who 
was  killed  at  Pmky,  anno  1547.  He  left  six  sons  and  three  daughters ;  Alexan- 
der, William  of  Ardlogie,  Robert  of  Tillilair,  from  whom  Fortry  is  descended, 
Gilbert  of  Cullairly,  who  had  three  sons,  Alexander,  Gilbert,  and  John  of  Murthill, 
James,  Knight  of  IVIalta,  ordained  by  the  Great  Master,  Prior  of  the  Order  in 
Scotland,  and  was  to  have  been  created  Lord  Torphiclien,  had  he  submitted 
to  the  Reformation,  and  John  the  sixth  son.  The  daughters  were,  Janet  married 
to  Gordon  of  Abergeldy,  Elizabeth  to  the  Laird  of  Meldrum,  and  the  third  to 
Arnadge. 

P>om  John  of  Murthill,  now  mentioned,  are  descended  the  Lwines  of  Murthill  and 
Cults. 

Alexander,  the  eldest,  married  Lady  Elizabeth  Keith,  daughter  to  the  Earl  Maris- 
chal, by  whom  he  had  live  sons  and  four  daughters.  The  eldest  married  to  Ury, 
the  second  to  Keith  of  Craig-Inverugie,  third  to  Ogilvy  of  Boyne,  and  the  fourth 
to  Menzies  of  Pitfoddels.  The  sons  were,  Alexander,  the  eldest,  second  Robert 
of  Fornet  or  Montcoffer,  extinct,  third  James  of  Brucklaw,  the  predecessor  of  Sa- 
phock,  fourth  William  of  Bealty  also  extinct,  and  the  fifth  John  of  Ardtamford, 
the  predecessor  of  Crimond  and  Ardtamford. 

That  this  J.ViMES  was  the  third  son,  and  John  the  fifth,  is  instructed  by  the  two 
original  charters  granted  by  Drum,  their  father,  to  them,  the  one  dated  5th  Febru- 
ary 1598,  and  the  other  27th  March  1602,  in  the  custody  of  Mr  Irvine  of  Saph- 
ock,  which  serves  to  rectify  a  mistake  in  the  First  Volume,  page  395. 

Alexander,  son  of  this  Drum,  married  Marion  Douglas,  daughter  to  the  Earl 
of  Buchan.  He  had  two  sons,  Alexander  and  Robert  of  Fedderet,  and  five 
daughters  ;  eldest  Lady  Banff,  second  married  to  Urquhart  of  Leathers,  third  to 
Douglas  of  Glenbervie,  fourth  to  Ogilvie  of  Innerquharity,  and  the  fifth  to  Graham 
of  Morphy. 

Robert,  the  second  son,  married Campbell,  daughter  to  Glenorchy.  He 

had  two  sons,  Alexander  and  Robert,  and  two  daughters,  one  married  to  Gordon 
of  Gight,  and  the  other  to  Fraser  of  Strichen.  Alexander  married  Lady  Eliza- 
beth Ogilvie,  daughter  to  the  Earl  of  Fmdlater  :  Both  he  and  his  brother  Robert 
died  without  male  issue.  This  Drum  mortified  four  bursaries  to  the  Grammar- 
school  of  Aberdeen,  at  L.  80  Scots  each ;  to  the  university  there,  four  of  philo- 
sophy at  L.  100  Scots,  and  two  of  divinity  at  200  merks  each.  His  lady  endowed 
an  hospital  for  relief  of  poor  widows:  Of  all  which  Drum  is  patron. 

His  eldsst  son,  Sir  Alex.ander  Irvine,  was  Sherift-Principal  of  Aberdeen  ;  he 
married  Magdalen  Scrymgeour,  daughter  to  Dudhope,  Constable  of  Dundee,  and 
had  five  sons,  Alexander,  Robert,  James,  Charles,  and  Francis  ;  the  four  younger 
died  without  issue  ;  and  six  daughters,  Marion  married  to  the  Viscount  of  Fren- 
draught,  Anne  to  the  Earl  of  Aboyne,  Ehzabeth,  Jean,  Isabel,  and  Marga- 
ret. 

Alexander  married  Lady  Mary  Gordon,  daughter  to  the  Marquis  of  Huntly,  and 
had  by  her  three  sons,  Alexander,  Robert,  and  Charles  ;  and  four  daughters,  Mary 
maiTied  to  Patrick  Count  L?she  of  Balquhain,  Margaret  to  Menzies  of  Pitfoddels, 
Jean  to  Irvine  of  Murthill,  and  Henrietta  to  Pitcaple.     By  a  second  marriage  he 

Vol.  II.  e,  A 


68  APPENDIX. 

upon  record,  made  me  think  that  I  would  have  been  wanting  to  the  public,  and 
many  families  all  Europe  over,  should  I  not  have  given  a  more  particular  de- 
duction threof. 

Gentilitian,  or  family  names,  are  but  of  late,  which  obliges  me  to  go  back  to 
former  ages.  The  Ptolemies,  Fahli,  Bruti,  and  Ciceros  were  so  called  on  different 
accounts ;  but  the  noblest  rise  of  surnames  was  from  the  arms  under  which  they 
and  their  ancestors  had  performed  glorious  achievements  {a),  which,  after  the  wars, 
they  retained. 

Thence  it  is  a  clear  proof  of  a  noble  descent,  when  the  name  is  taken  from 
these  bearmgs  (i),  amongst  the  most  divine  and  heroic,  whereof  we  find  the 
Horns,  and  that  glory  (r),  honour,  beauty,  and  empire,  are  by  them  symboli- 
zed {d). 

They  were  the  sacred  and  royal  badges  of  the  gods  and  heroes  {e).  Jupiter, 
Y't'O,  Sospita,  Pan,  and  other  deities,  distinguished  themselves  by  these  ;  and,  up- 
on their  first  appearance  upon  the  brave  Frretor's  head,  he  was  by  the  soothsayers 
saluted  king(/). 

Bacchus  thdt  mighty  conqueror  carried  the  horns  in  his  crest  and  banners,  and 
therefore  was  called  Corniger.  Alexander  King  of  Macedon  no  sooner  fancied  him- 
self the  son  of  Jupiter,  than  he  clapt  the  horns  in  his  crest  and  coins,  as  conqueror 
of  the  eastern  and  western  empires,  and  was  foretold  by  the  prophet  {g),  by  the 
goat  with  the  horns,  and  the  asra  from  his  conquests  was  called  dalcarnaim  pr 
horned  (Z»). 

Pyrrhus,  the  bravest  of  all  his  successors,  perpetuate  this  heroic  bearing  to  his 
descendants  (i),  who,  in  the  wars  with  Hannibal,  left  Eprus,  joined  the  Romans, 
and  from  their  arms,  as  Bacchus  and  Alexander  formerly,  were  called  Cornuti,  Cor- 
nigeri,  and  Cormificii,  and  afforded  generals,  consuls,  praetors,  and  other  magistrates 
to  that  glorious  republic. 

The  using  the  same  name  and  arms  is  an  uncontested  proof  of  cadency  and 
descent.  These  of  the  Cornuti,  and  those  of  the  surname  of  Horn  have  been  always 
the  same  (^k)  ;  for  upon  the  fatal  division  of  the  empire  to  Constantine's  sons,  we  find 
them  blazoned  (/),  "  Duo  cornua  venatoria  rubra  in  parma  lutea,  quae  in  summo 
*'  instar  lunae  fiectuntur  duphci  circulo  margo  circumdatur."  By  the  two  horns 
representing  the  eastern  and  western  empires,  by  the  two  circles,  insinuating,  that 
■although  they  were  divided  in  the  persons  of  two  emperors,  yet  they  continued 
(jue  and  the  same,  to  which  they  had  a  Minerva  added  (jn),  in  token  of  their  wis- 
dom as  well  as  valour. 

Frequent  mention  is  made  by  the  Roman  and  other  historians  of  the  Cornuti,  and 
great  actions  by  them  performed. 

It  was  they  who,  under  the  brave  Julian,  retrieved  the  sinking  glory  of  Rome 
at  the  battle  of  Strasburg  against  the  united  Germans.  "  Cornuti  enim  (says 
"  an  eye  witness)  («)  usu  armorum  diu  assueti  gestu  terrentes  barritum  civere 
"  nrma  armis  corpora  corporibus  obtrudebant,"  whereby  they  stayed  the  flying 
army,  and  obtained  a  glorious  victory. 

It  was  also  they  who  supprest  the  usurpation  of  Sylvanus  against  Constantius : 
"  CcEsis  custodibus  (writes  the  same  author)  (o)  regia  penetrata  Sylvanum  extrac- 
'•  tum  asdiculo,  quo  exanimatus  confugerat  densis  gladiorum  ictibus  trucidarunt." 

Besides,  what  is  writ  of  the  Cornuti  in  general,  we  have  upon  record  many  great 
men  of  that  name.  Sextus  Coinutus,  an  illustrious  senator,  asserted  the  Roman 
liberty  against  Cinna  and  Marius,  and  in  that  bloody  proscription  was  saved  by 
the  fidelity  of  his  slaves  (/)),  in  taking  the  body  of  a  slaughtered  plebeian,  putting 
their  master's  clothes  upon  him,  with  his  ring  on  his  finger,  rolling  all  in  blood,, 
bringing  in  the  satellites  to  see  their  slaughtered  lord,  sending  the  ring  to  Marius, 
thereby  to  get  the  promised  reward,  giving  the  funeral  pale,  whereby  all  farther 
enquiry  was  laid  aside,  and  he  escaped  to  the  Gauls. 

Julius  CfEsar,  in  his  greatest  danger,  did  animate  his  fainting  army  by  telling 
them,  after  his  loss  at  Dyrachium,  that  Q^iintus  Cornutus  (or  Cornuficius)  was- 

(a)  Juris,  prud.  per  page  112.  {h)  Pasch.  lib.  10.  4.  (0  Psal.  cli.  89.  ver.  i;.  {J)  Psal.  92.  ver.  10. 
(e)  Span.  d.  U5.  num.  pag.  4C0.  (/)  Val.  Max.  lib.  5.  cap.  6.  §  s.  {g)  Dan.  cap.  8-  ver.  21. 
(*)  Alfran.  cap.  1.  §  6.  d.  aeris.  (0  Plut.  in  vita  Pyrrh.  (Q  Alicat.  par.  lib.  5.  cap.  13.  (/)  Grajv. 
Thf:.  ant.  Rom.  pag.  ]8:8.  (m)  Ibid.  pag.  1830.  (n)  Ammian.  Marcel,  lib.  18.  cap.  12.  (0)  Lib. 
1  1;.  cap.  I'l     ip)  Pint,  in  vita  Marii. 


APPENDIX.  69 

coming  with  two  legions  to  their  assistance,  to  whom,  after  Pharsalia,  the  finish- 
ing of  tlie  civil  war  was  committed  ;  he  put  an  end  tiiereto  with  a  great  deal  of 
glory  (1/)  and  in  memory  thereof  built  Cornutum,  (now  Presburg)  the  capital  of 
Upper  Hungary.  He  arraigned  Brutus,  as  Agrippa  did  Cassius,  for  Caesar's  mur- 
der  (.). 

Augustus  Cajsar  did  owe  the  preservation  of  his  army  in  Sicily  to  Lucius  Cor- 
nutus,  who  had  that  island  for  his  province,  which  being  reduced  to  great  straits 
by  the  shipureck  of  Augustus  coming  to  their  relief,  yet  he  made  a  brave  retreat 
in  the  face  of  Pompey  the  younger's  ai-my.  He  was  consul  with  Sextus  Pompeius, 
Augustus'  near  kinsman  (s),  and  repaired  the  buildmgs  consecrated  to  Diana  at 
Rome  (r). 

There  was  another  brave  republican,  Quintus  Cm-nutus,  or  Cornuficius,  who, 
with  Brutus  and  Cassius,  stood  for  the  senate  against  the  Triumvirs,  and  received 
into  Africa  his  province  all  that  fled  thither;  but  after  he  had  done  all  that  was  pos- 
sible for  his  country's  liberty,  finding  his  army  dispirited,  he  disdainfully  called 
them  Gidkati  Lcpoies  (/(),  and  died  on  bis  sword ;  it  was  to  him  that  Cicero  wrote 
his  17,  18,  10,  and  22  epistles.  There  are  several  coins  still  extant,  bearing  the 
effigies  and  inscription  of  ^t/itiis  Cornutus  Ati^ur  Ifl  Imperator  (t»^. 

Tacitus  {yj)  affords  us  another  noble  Roman  and  lover  of  his  country,  Cecilius 
Cornutus,  who  had  been  prator  among  the  Gauls,  and  in  that  time,  by  his  justice 
and  liberality,  had  gained  a  great  ascendant  over  that  nation.  He  was  accused  by 
Tiberius,  as  having  advanced  great  sums  of  money  to  make  them  revolt ;  but 
rather  as  undergo  a  trial  before  a  prince  where  virtue  was  a  crime,  according  to 
the  then  heroic  custom,  he  made  choice  of  a  voluntary  death. 

There  was  another  Cornutus  sent  over  from  Boulogne  by  Julius  Caesar  with  the 
British  ambassadors,  to  discover  the  coimtry  and  inhabitants ;  Echard  calls  him 
Corneo  (x). 

They  were  not  only  famous  in  the  state  for  arms  and  government,  but  also  for 
learning.  vEneas  Cornutus  fell  under  Nero's  displeasure  for  saying  he  had  writ 
too  much  (  v)  ;  he  criticised  Virgil  (z).  And  there  was  another  no  ways  inferior 
to  Livy  for  history  ;  and  in  what  esteem  a  third  was,  appears  from  Persius's  5th 
Satire  ;  a  fourth  wrote  mythology,  or  the  history  of  the  gods ;  and  the  learned 
Cornuficia  did  show  that  poesie  and  letters  were  not  denied  her  sex. 

By  the  way,  I  must  notice  why  the  herns,  the  most  honourable  of  all  the  an- 
cient bearings,  should  be  pointed  to  a  certain  kind  of  men,  as  a  badge  of  their 
misfortunes;  and  I  find  (laying  aside  the  story  of  Andronicus,  and  venison  sent  to 
his  favourite  ladies,  the  horns  whereof  the  husbands  next  day  affixed  to  their  gates, 
to  show  the  favour  they  were  in  with  the  emperor,  and  the  curious  Acteon  with 
the  bathing  Diana)  (i?)  the  jest  to  have  arisen  from  Lucius  Cornutus,  a  tribune  in 
the  Roman  army,  who  being  suspected  of  an  intrigue  with  a  lady,  from  whose  lodg- 
ings being  called  suddenly,  he,  by  an  unlucky  mistake,  clapt  the  husband's  hel- 
met on  his  head,  thinking  it  his  own,  wlio,  not  dreading  the  consequences,  fol- 
lowed with  that  of  his  guest  with  the  horns  ;  and  both  appearing  in  the  army 
thus  dressed,  occasioned  an  huzza  ;  the  confusion  on  both  sides  was  great ;  the 
casques  were  with  mutual  blushes  returned  ;  the  story  spread,  as  scandals  do,  and 
gave  rise  to  the  calling  all  such  good-natured  husbands  Cornuti,  and  their  assistants 
Cornuficii,  and  the  continuing  that  byname  with  that  branch  of  the  family,  a 
thing  very  usual  among  the  Romans  (i). 

Having  given  a  short  hint  of  the  Cornuti,  whilst  the  state  of  Rome  remained 
under  consuls  and  emperors,  with  the  succeeding  Goths  they  continued  in  good 
friendship  ;  but  Attila  and  his  barbarous  Huns  having  wasted  Italy,  the  Cornuti 
were  obliged  to  shift,  some  whereof  retired  to  the  islands  in  the  Adriatic  Sea, 
and  with  other  noble  Romans  founded  the  city  and  republic  of  Venice  ;  others 
lurked  in  Italy,  a  third  joined  Meroveus  King  of  the  Franks,  but  the  greatest  part 

(?)  Caes-  Com.  de  Bell.  Ale.t.  (r)  Plut.  in  vita  Bruti-  (j)  Dion.  Cass.  pag.  245.  (/)  Suet,  in  vita.. 
Augas.  (a)  Vos.  de  nat.  art.  p.  35.  {y)  Patin.  fam.  Rom-  pag.  93.  (w)  Lib.  4.  cap.  8.  (*■)  Vol. 
I.  page  307.  {y)  Dion.  Cas.  page  250.  (k)  Aul.  Gel.  lib.  2.  cap.  6.  (a)  Span.  d.  us.  num.  page 
202.     {J/]  Cartr.  Hist.  Rom.  vol.  13.  page  93. 

Vol.  II.  5  B 


70  APPENDIX. 

associated  with  Thorismund  King  of  the  Goths,  and  for  some  ages  shared  in-  tiieir 
fortunes. 

This  once-united  Gens  or  tribe  being  thus  separate,  could  not  but  receive  an  al- 
teration in  their  surnames,  according  to  the  humour  and  languages  of  the  several 
nations  with  whom  they  had  associated,  yet  still  they  retained  the  paternal  and  fa- 
mily arms. 

In  the  State  of  Venice,  where  lofty  and  sonorous  names  were  affected,  from  de 
C'jrnu  they  assumed  de  Cornaro;  of  which  house  the  three  branches  are  St  Maurice, 
St  Paul,  and  Calle,  brothers  to  the  renowned  Queen  of  Cyprus;  they  are  a  size  of 
nobility  above  all  the  families  in  that  state,  and  carry  themselves  so  high,  tliA 
many  daughters  have  become  nuns,  lest  they  should  be  obliged  to  change  their 
own  most  noble  name  with  that  of  a  husband  (c);  they  have  been  Doges,  and 
borne  the  greatest  offices  both  in  church  and  state. 

In  Italy  they  retain  the  name  de  Cornu  or  Corneo ;  of  which  tha-e  are  several 
great  families  still  extant ;  and  frequent  mention  is  made  (rf)  of  the  brave  Ascanea 
de  Cornu,  to  whom  the  victory  of  Lepanto  and  preservation  of  Malta  against  the 
Tuiks  in  a  great  measure  was  owing.  He  had  a  hand  in  all  the  exploits  performed 
by  Don  John,  both  in  Africa  and  the  Low  Countries. 

In  France  they  are  Lords  of  Villeneuve,  near  Montreiiil,  and  retain  the  name  de 
Cornu  \2  Cormttus.  They  were  famous  in  the  gov/n  ;  Gautier  de  Cornu,  anno  1223, 
was  Archbishop  of  Sens,  and  great  Eleemosynary  to  Philip  Augustus.  Gilon  de  Cornu. 
was  also  an  archbishop,  and  attended  St  Louis  to  the  holy  wars.  The  Sees  of 
Chartres  and  Ncvers  were  also  filled  by  two  of  his  name  (<°). 

As  to  the  fourth  and  greatest  part  of  this  once-united  clan,  which  associated  with- 
the  Goths,  horn  signifying  the  same  thing  in  the  Sclavonian,  Gothic,  German, 
Dutch,  and  British  languages,  that  cornu  did  in  the  Latin,  they  assumed  the 
surname  of  Horn,  but  still  retained  the  paternal  arms  without  the  least  altera-, 
tion. 

The  Goths  having  retired  to  Sweden,  the  Horns  seated  on  the  Maese,  and  built 
the  city  and  Castle  of  Horn  on  that  river,  Horn  in  North  Holland,  Hornburgh 
in  the  Lower  Germany,  with  a  great  many  other  towns  and  castles,  of  which, 
although  at  first  they  had  the  sovereignty,  yet  since  many  of  them  iiave  been 
wrested  from  their  first  founders,  of  whom  they  retain  now  no  more  than  the 
name  and  arms. 

Christopher  Butkins,  in  his  Trophies Brabantia,  writes  thus :  "  The  House  of  Horn 
'•  is  the  most  ancient  and  illustrious  of  the  seventeen  provinces  ;  and  for  its  anti- 
"  quity,  power,  and  high  alliances,  deserves  to  be  placed  among  the  sovereign 
"  states,  it  being  certain  that  the  lords  of  that  house  have  possessed  their  estates,. 
"  without  any  dependance  or  homage  to  any  other  prince,  and  were  absolute  so- 
"  vereigns  of  the  country  on  the  Maese,  and  as  such  did  coin  money  with  their 
"  own  impressions,  which  do  still  pass  current  in  the  county  of  Liege." 

Gille,  a  Monk  of  Arvile,  in  his  Annals  of  the  Bishops  of  Liege,  writes  the  his- 
tory of  this  noble  family  from  the  year  1701,  "  That  Conrade  Count  de  Horn  asso- 
"  ciate  with  the  Bishop  of  Liege,  Earls  of  Namur  and  Luxemburg,  for  keeping 
"  the  peace  of  the  country,  but  excuseth  his  not  going  further  back,  because  some 
"  years  before  that  time,  the  Normans,  by  a  barbarous  eruption  on  the  Maese,  burnt 
•'  down  churches,  records,  and  monuments,  whereby  the  memory  of  preceding  ac- 
"  tions  might  have  been  transmitted  to  posterity." 

This  illustrious  and  independent  house  lost  their  sovereignty  anno  1106,  by 
William  I.  associating  with  the  neighbouring  princes  agamst  Henry  V.  who,  by 
his  imperial  power,  had  divested  the  Duke  of  Limburg  of  the  Dutchy  of  Brabant, 
vind  given  it  to  Godfrey  Duke  of  Lorrain,  which  they  thought  of  bad  example;  and 
although  at  first  the  success  was  doubtful,  yet,  in  the  end,  victory  inclined  to  the 
imperial  side,  whereby  the  count,  after  a  siege  in  his  own  town  of  Horn,  was 
obliged  to  capitulate,  and  buy  his  piece  at  the  rate  of  his  independency,  and,  from 
a  free  and  absolute  prince,  became  a  feudatory  of  the  Roman  Empire. 

The  Counts  of  Horn,  as  Knights  of  the  Golden  Eleece,  do  bear  (/)  "  Tria  cor- 

(c)  Burn,  Let.  from  Florence.  (</)  Strada.  Ricl.  Tiir.  page  522.  torn.  3.  (f)  Guil.  le  Bre:.  lib.  12. 
{/)  Chifl.  de  Gen.  less.  cap.  21.  page  73. 


APPENDIX.  71 

•'  ima  venatoiia  coccinea,  argcnto  annillata  in  scuto  aureo  apex:  pileus  turbina- 
"  tus  hermonicus  mal■^■ine  pavunico  lacinix'  Pwiiticae  et  cocciiicu:." 

Their  lands  were  erected  into  a  pvincipality  b_v  Cluirles  hut  ts-ing  of  Spain,  in  the 
person  of  Eugene  Maximilian  Prince  and  Count  <iV  Homes,  anr.oi  677,  whose  son  Phi- 
lip Emanuel,  Prince  and  Count,  was  Lieutenant-Gcneral  to  his  Catholic  Majesty, 
and  grandee  of  tlie  first  rank  in  Spain;  he  was  bred  fi-om  his  voutli  in  the  wars 
both  in  Hunga>-y  against  the  T.urtis,  and  in  his  own  country,  and,  after  signal  ser- 
vices done  to  the  Spanish  Monarchy,  he  died  at  Brussels  of  the  wounds  he  had  re- 
ceived at  Ramillies. 

This  most  illustrious  family  is  presently  represented  by  Maximilian  Emanuel  Prince 
and  Count  dc  Homes  Onacourt,  Count  of  Bassigne,  Hautkirk  Balliul,  &c.  He 
was  born  at  Brussels  the  3  rst  of  August  1695,  and  is  married  to  Lady  Charlotte  Mary 
Bruce,  only  daughter  to  Robert  Earl  of  Elgin  arid  Aylesbury,  a  male  branch  of  the 
royal  family  of  the  Bruces  by  the  Countess  Sanau,  in  a  second  marriage,  and  is 
short  of  none  of  his  noble  ancestors. 

They  have  matched  with  the  imperial  and  greatest  families  in  Europe.  Gerard, 
the  first  Count  dc  Homes  was  married,  anno  1306,  to  Emergard,  daughter  to  the 
Emperor  Albert,  William  VI.  to  Elizabeth  of  Cieves,  whereby  Theodore,  their  son, 
succeeded  to  great  estates :  his  grandchild,  M</rv '^f  Homes,  was  married  to  the  re- 
nowned John  Stewart  Earl  of  Marr,  nephew  to  Robert  III.  Kmg  of  Scots,  who  got 
with  her  the  lordships  of  Duffel  and  VValhem  (  p-).  He  was  among  the  first  of 
our  Scots  heroes,  and  obtained  glorious  victories  abroad,  and,  at  Harlaw,  in  Aber- 
deenshire, where  he  beat  Donald  of  the  Isles  with  triple  his  number. 

The  House  of  Orange  da  bear  the  hunting-horn  in  their  arms  and  coins  for  the 
lordships  of  Sichem  and  Disst,  got  by  a  match  with  this  family. 

It  is  from  this  noble  and  ancient  House  of  Horn  v/e  see  innumerable  generals 
and  noble  and  honourable  families  descended  in  most  parts  of  Europe,  who,  in  each 
age,  have  made  a  bright  appearance  in  some  parts  thereof. 

In  Sweden  they  aSbrded  a  tract  of  heroes  from  Sigismund  III.  son  to  William  IV. 
Count  d'Homes,  who  was  sent  by  his  fiither  to  the  aid  of  Magnus  IV.  King  of 
Sweden  against  the  Muscovites;  since  which  time  all  the  race'have  been  either  ge- 
nerals, colonels,  or  senators  of  that  kingdom,  and  have  greatly  enlarged  the  domi- 
nions and  glory  thereof.. 

Gustavus  Horn,  General  to  the  great  Gustavus  Adolphus  and  Marechal  of  France, 
was  descended  ot  this  branch,  ever  victorious  till  the  battle  of  Norlingen,  fought  con- 
trary to  his  advice,  where  I2,ccd  Germans  and  Swedes  were  killed,  and  he  made 
prisoner;  of  which  overthrow  Puflendorlf  having  given  the  lamentable  account, 
concludes  (A),  "  Sed  maxima  jactura  in  Horneo  erat :  a  cujus  sententia,  si  res  ges- 
"  tae  fuissent  irreparabilis  clades  declinari  poterat."  He  was  received  by  Ferdinand 
King  of  the  Romans  and  Hungary,  who  commanded  for  the  emperor,  with  all  the 
marks  of  esteem  due  to  so  great  a  man;  and,  after  some  months  generous  entertain- 
ment, had  his  liberty;  and  was  one  of  the  Administrators  to  the  crown  of  Sweden 
during  Qj.ieen  Christina's  minority. 

Count  Henry  Horn,  nephew  to  Gustavus,  as  he  succeeded  to  his  uncle  in  his 
great  estates,  so  in  arms  he  endeavoured  to  follow  his  example,  for  being  general 
of  the  Swedish  army,  which  did  not  exceed  30,000  men,  he  overthrew  at  Warsaw 
50,000  Poles  and  as  many  Tartars,  who  were  come  to  their  aid  in  one  day,  they 
being  separately  encamped  ;  an  action  worthy  to  be  recorded  to  all  posterity. 

A-S  in  the  Roman  world  this  race  not  oniv  afforded  great  generals,  but  also  states- 
men, so,  in  ours.  Count  Arvid  Horn  was  High  Chancellor  of  S.veden  during  the 
last  king's  reign,  and  gave  great  proofs  of  his  consummate  abilities  at  such  a  critical 
juncture,  and  at  the  great  Congress  at  Lubeck,  anno  1651.  Lord  Chancellor  Horn, 
for  Prussia,  contributed  very  much,  with  the  Imperial,  French,  Swedish,  and  other 
ambassadors  to  the  peace  of  Germany  (/). 

There  is  yet  a  Swedish  General  no  less  to  be  noticed  than  any  of  these  we  have 
mentioned,  Cnint  Hening  Rudolph  Horn,  Senator  of  the  kingdom,  Major-General 
and  Commander  in  Chief  at  Narva,  who,  with  iSoomen,  defended  that  city  against 
100,000  Muscovites  for  three  months,  whereby  he  afforded  his  glorious  monarch  a 

(f)  Jur.  Her.  page  2S3.         (/■)  page  162.         (i)  Can.  Mem.  p.  253. 


;-  APPENDIX, 

noble  scene,  the  29th  November  1700,  of  beating  that  numerous  army,  and  tak- 
ing more  prisoners  than  there  were  soldiers  on  the  Swedish  side  (k);  he  had  a  great 
hand  in  all  his  sovereign's  transactions  whom  he  represented,  by  sitting  at  dinner 
upon  King  Stanislaus's  right  hand,  and  conducting  the  Qtieen  tlie  day  of  liis  coro- 
nation (/). 

In  Greece,  anno  1688,  General  Horn  commanded  the  confederate  army  with 
Cornaro;  for  the  Venetians  took  Athens,  and  gave  several  signal  defeats  to  the 
Turks  (;«). 

There  was  another  noble  branch  of  this  House,  Counts  of  Bassigne  Gnesbeck, 
S^c.  of  which  house  Maximilian  was  Great  Chamberlain  to  the  Emperor  Charles 
V. ;  and  in  another  chapter  held  at  Middieburgh,  anno  1515,  was  made  Knight 
of  the  Golden  Fleece  (n). 

Strada  (0)  mentions  a  brave  patriot,  William  cTHorn,  a  young  Lord  Baron  of 
Heze,  and  Governor  of  Brussels,  who,  at  the  shaking  off  the  Spanish  yoke,  order- 
ed Gliraes,  Governor  of  Brabant,  to  enter  the  palace,  and  make  all  those  of  the 
Spanish  faction  prisoners.  He  restored  peace  to  that  city  then  in  a  great  commo- 
tion. He  was  still  faithful  to  his  prince,  although  with  many  others  mistaken,  and 
lost  his  head  in  the  cause. 

In  England  they  appeared  in  to^a  y  sa^a.  Robert  Horn  was  Bishop  of  Win- 
chester and  Prelate  of  the  Garter  (p).  And  Andrew  Horn's  Learned  Mirror  of 
jubtice,  wrote  in  the  reign  of  Edward  I.  shows  his  eminency  in  the  laws. 

Robert  Horn,  with  the  Lord  Falconbridge,  led  the  van  of  Edward  IV's  army 
anno  J461,  and  obtained  a  glorious,  though  bloody  victory  (y).  Sir  William 
Horn,  son  to  Thomas  Horn  of  Snailwell,  for  his  bravery  was  knighted  in  the  field 
by  Henry  VII.  and  afterwards  Lord  Mayor  of  London.  And  to  conclude,  in  an- 
cient or  modern  histories  we  do  not  find  any  one  name  that  hath  afforded  more 
brave  generals  or  valiant  soldiers  than  this  of  Horn. 

This  illustrious  house,  whose  branches,  like  a  mighty  cedar,  have  spread  all 
Europe  over,  afforded  also  to  us  a  scion  cultivate  by  a  royal  hand.  For  King 
David  being  obliged,  by  the  invasion  of  Edward  Baliol,  to  pass  much  of  his  youth 
in  France,  where  Oibo  cVHorn,  third  son  to  Gerard  Count  d' Homes  (?),  was  High 
Admiral  (j-),  and  in  that  time  had  done  him  many  signal  services,  and  having 
sent  over  yohn  d'Horn,  his  near  kinsman  of  the  House  of  Horn,  to  congratulate  his 
majesty  upon  his  return  from  his  captivity  in  England,  his  majesty  was  so  well 
pleased  with  the  messenger,  that  he  thought  it  a  proper  method  to  retain  him, 
and  acknowledge  former  services,  to  bestow  upon  this  stranger  the  honour  of  his 
cousin  Janet,  daughter  (as  I  have  good  ground  to  believe)  to  Sir  William  Fraset 
of  Cowe,  second  son  and  heir-male  to  Sir  Alexander  Eraser,  first  Chamberlain  of 
Scotland,  in  marriage,  with  the  lands  of  Glenlyon ;  all  which  do  exactly  agree  with 
the  chronology,  and  several  documents  before  me,  particularly  the  following  char- 
ter, still  extant,  and  in  the  public  registers. 

"  David  D.  G.  Rex  Scotorum :  Sciatis  nos  dedisse,  &-c.  dilecto  &  fideli  nostro 
"  Joanni  de  Horn,  &  Jannetae,  sponsae  suae  consanguineae  nostrse  predilectae,  totam 
"  terram  nostram  de  Glenlyon  in  Athol,  cum  justis  suis  pertinend.  tenen.  &.  haben. 
"  eidem  Joanni  &  Jannetae,  &c.  cum  libertatibus,  &c.  ad  dictam  terram  pertinen. 
"  quosque  eisdem  fieri  fecimus,  statum  haereditarium  de  tanta  terra  in  loco  com- 
"  petenti  faciendo,  inde  servitium  debitum  &  consuetum,  revocatione  nostra  ulti- 
"  mo  facta,  non  obstante.  In  cujus  rei  testimonium  prssenti  cartae  nostras,  sigil- 
"  lum  nostrum  prscipimus  apponi.  Testibus  Patricio  Episcopo  Brichinen.  Can- 
'  cellario  nostro,  Rolserto  Senescallo  Scotis  Comite  de  Strathern  nepote  nostro, 
"  Roberto  de  Erskin,  &-  Archibaldo  de  Douglass,  militibus,  apud  Perth,  duodecimo 
'•'  Martii,  anno  regni  nostri  tricesimo  nono." 

Their  descendants  possessed  these  lands  till  after  King  James  I.'s  return  from 
England,  at  which  time  differences  having  arisen  in  the  royal  family,  they,  with 
many  others,  suffered  thereby. 

(^)  Hist.  K.  of  Swed.  (/)  Hist.  Eur.  an.  1705.  p.  375.  (m)  Ricl.  Hist.  torn.  3.  p.  320.  (n)  Chif. 
Cap.  143.  (0)  Vol.  I.  p.  467.  (/i)  Holin.  p.  1299-  (?)  Holin-  p.  664-  (r)  Sup.  Mor.  Diet.  Horn.. 
fr)  Mich.  Vas..  Cat.  d' Adm.  de  Fx. 


APPENDIX.  73; 

John  Horn  of  that  Ilk  and  Westerhall,  as  representing  that  family,  bears  the 
paternal  coat-armorial,  and  hath  in  some  measure  retrieved  tlie  breaches  made  by 
his  predecessors.  For,  in  the  late  civil  wars,  John  and  Andrew  Horn,  his  two 
uncles,  raised  all  they  could  for  the  service  of  King  Charles  II.  their  royal  master, 
whom  they  attended  to  Worcester,  leaving  nothing  to  James,  their  younger  bro- 
ther, his  father,,  then  a  child,  save  some  small  reversions,  where  John,  who  com- 
manded a  troop  of  horse,  was  killed,  and  Andrew  obliged  to  flee  to  Sweden,  where 
he  was  kindly  received,  and  advanced  by  Count  Henry  Horn,  the  then  Swedish 
general. 

I  here  take  occasion  to  rectify  a  former  mistake,  and  do  justice  to  the  lairds  of 
Pitcaple,  from  which  house  the  above  gentleman  is  descended.  For,  in  the  former 
Treatise  (r),  David  Leslie,  first  Laud  of  Pitcaple,  is  said  to  have  been  a  son  of 
Kincraigie's,  whUe,  as  1  find  by  undoubted  proofs,  and  a  charter  before  me,  dated 
the  5th  day  of  March  1457,  William  Leslie  of  Balquhain,  rniles,  resigning  in  the 
sovereign's  hands  the  lands  of  Harlaw,  Rasiuet,  barony  of  Pitcaple,  and  others, 
in  favours  of  David  Leslie,  his  eldest  son  of  a  second  marriage,  procreate  betwixt 
him  and  Euphame  Lindsay,  and  that  this  lady  was  only  child  to  W^illiam  Lindsay 
of  Cairnie,  second  son  to  David  first  Earl  of  Crawford,  who  married  Janet,  daugh- 
ter to  King  Robert  II.  and  that  the  lairds  of  Balquhain  got  the  said  lands  of 
Cairnie  by  that  marriage,  of  which  the  present  lairds  of  Pitcaple  are  descended. 

There  are  a  great  many  honourable  tamilies  of  this  surname  in  England,  and 
other  places,  with  some  distinction,  such  as  Horner,  descended  of  the  noble  Cgr- 
nujicii,  Langhorn,  a  family  distinguished  for  their  loyalty  in  the  late  civil  wars, 
Coehorn  the  brave  general,  and  famous  engineer  in  the  Revolution  wars,  with  se- 
veral others  bearing  the  same  arms  with  some  mark  of  distinction. 

To  conclude,  there  are  innumerable  documents  which  do  instruct  the  antiquity, 
high  alliances,  noble  and  lineal  descent,  martial  achievements,  and  great  esteem 
this  House  of  Horn  hath  been  always  in,  as  far  back  as  we  have  history,  whereby 
it  may  justly  claim  not  only  a  place  iathis  book,  but  also  among  the  most  illustri- 
ous families  in  Europe. 

Horn  of  Westerhall  does  bear  the  paternal  coat  or,  three  hunting-horns  ^uks; 
above  the  shield  a  helmet,  with  a  mantle  gules,  doubling  argent,  and  on  a  wreath 
of  his  colours  is  set,  for  his  crest,  two  horns  conjoined  parti  per  fesse,  or  and  sable, 
counter-charged ;  and,  on  an  escrol,  above  this  motto,  Moneo  l^  munio. 


SOMERVILLE  Lord  SOMERVILLE.. 


THE  first  of  this  noble  and  very  ancient  family  was  Sir  Gualtier  de  So.mer- 
viLLE,  who  came  into  England  with  William  the  Conqueror,  and,  as  a  reward  for 
his  great  merit  and  services,  obtained  from  that  victorious  duke  the  lordship  of 
Whichenovre,  in  the  county  of  Stafford,  where  his  descendants  long  continued  in 
great  splendour. 

William  de  Somerville,  a.  younger  son  of  the  Lord  of  Whichenovre,  went  into 
Scotland  about  the  year  1130,  in  the  reign  of  King  David  I.  with  whom  he  be- 
came in  great  favom",  as  appears  by  his  being  a  frequent  witness  to  the  religious 
grants  made  by  that  prince;  particularly  we  find  him,  with  other  nobles  of  that 
court,  a  witness  to  the  foundation  of  the  abbacy  of  Melrose,  anno  1136.  He  ob- 
tained from  King  David  the  lands  and  barony  of  Carnwath,  in  the  county  of 
Lanark ;  and  afterwards,  for  his  eminent  services  to  Malcolm  IV.  his  successor,  he 
got  the  barony  of  Linton  in  Tweeddale. 

This  William  was  succeeded  by  another  WiUiam,  who  was  much  in  the  favour 
of  King  William  the  Lion;  and,  at  the  marriage  of  Alexander  U.  was  one  of  the 
nobles  appointed  by  that  king  to  exercise  in  a  tournament  at  the  castle  of  Rox- 

VO.U.  ''',E- 


74  APPENDIX. 

burgh.    He  married  Margaret,  daughter  of  Walter  de  Newbiggin  Lord  of  Dunsyre, 
by  whom  he  had 

William  his  son  and  heir,  the  third  of  that  name,  whom  we  find  a  great  fa- 
vourite of  Alexander  III.  and  was  by  that  prince  knighted  ;  for  in  a  grant  of  the 
church  of  VViilston  to  the  Episcopal  See  of  Glasgow,  anno  1293,  he  is  designed 
Dominus  Gulielmus  de  Somerville,  miles.     He  was  succeeded  by  his  son 

Sir  Walter  de  Somekville,  who  fought  bravely  in  defence  of  his  country  in 
favour  of  King  Robert  I.  by  whom  he  was  taken  into  a  great  degree  of  confidence. 
He  married  Giles,  the  only  daughter  of  Sir  John  Herring,  and  with  her  he  had  the 
barony  of  Gilmerton,  in  which  are  the  lands  of  Drum  and  Goodtrees.  He  was 
succeeded  by  his  son 

Sir  Thomas  de  Somerville,  who  was  no  less  faithful  to  King  David  Bruce  than 
his  father  had  been  to  King  Robert,  having  attended  that  prince  at  the  battle  of 
Durham.  He  was  afterwards  sent  into  England  to  treat  of  the  king's  ransom;  and, 
amongst  other  nobles  of  the  kingdom,  we  find  Sir  Thomas  de  Somerville  one  of  the 
hostages  for  his  prince,  anno  1337.  He  married  Ehzabeth,  daughter  of  Sir  James 
Douglas  of  Loudon,  paternal  ancestor  to  the  present  Eaii  of  Morton,  by  whom  he 
had 

Sir  William  Somerville,  who  was  much  in  favour  with  King  Robert  II.  He 
married  Katharine,  daughter  and  co-heir  of  the  Lord  Maxwell,  in  the  county  of 
Stirling,  by  whom  he  had 

Sir  Thomas  Somerville,  his  heir,  (and  William,  of  whom  the  Somervilles  of 
Cambdo  and  Nevvbigging  are  descended.)  Sir  Thomas  was  one  of  the  hostages 
for  the  ransom  of  King  James  I.  from  his  captivity  in  England.  He  married 
Janet,  daughter  of  Alexander  Stewart  Lord  Darnly,  ancestor  of  the  Earls  of  Len- 
nox, and  from  whom  King  James  VI.  by  his  father,  is  descended ;  with  her  he 
had  the  lands  of  Cambusnethan,  in  the  county  of  Lanark,  which  was  afterwards 
given  away  in  patrimony  to  a  younger  son  (of  whom  the  Somervilles  of  Corehouse 
are  descended.)     He  was  succeeded  by 

Sir  William  his  son,  first  Lord  Somerville  and  Baron  of  Carnwath,  so  created  by 
King  James  II.  anno  1452.  This  Lord  married  Janet,  daughter  of  Sir  John  Mowat 
of  Stonehouse,  by  whom  he  had  John,  his  successor,  and  William,  of  whom  came 
the  Somervilles  of  Plain ;  as  also  two  daughters,  Janet,  married  to  Ralph  Weir  of 
Blackwood,  and  Mary,  to  William  Cleveland  of  that  Ilk.  This  lord  died  anno 
1456,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son 

John  Lord  Somerville,  who  married  Helen  Hepburn,  daughter  of  Adam  Lord 
Hailes,  and  sister  to  the  first  Earl  of  Bothwell,  by  whom  he  had  William,  his  heir, 
and  Elizabeth,  married  to  Archibald  Campbell,  eldest  son  of  the  first  Lord  of 
Campbell,  ancestor  to  the  present  Duke  of  Argyle. 

William  Lord  Somerville  married  Marjory,  daughter  of  Hugh  Lord  Montgo- 
mery, afterwards  Earl  of  Eglinton,  and  had  issue 

Hugh  Lord  Somerville,  a  great  favourite  with  King  James  V.  that  prince 
having  frequently  honoured  him  with  his  presence  at  his  lordship's  seat  at  Cow- 
thally.  This  noble  lord  made  a  considerable  figure  in  this  king's  reign,  having 
attended  his  majesty  in  the  unfortunate  expedition  to  Solway,  anno  1542,  where 
his  lordship  was  taken  prisoner.  He  was  eminently  concerned  in  all  the  public 
transactions  during  the  minority  of  Queen  Mary :  But  having,  when  prisoner  iu 
England,  contracted  a  friendship  with  King  Henry  VIII.  he  was  a  great  enemy  to 
the  French  interest,  and  was  for  uniting  the  two  kingdoms.  He  married  first 
Anne  daughter  of  James  Earl  of  Arran,  ancestor  to  his  Grace  the  present  Duke  of 
Hamilton ;  but  by  this  lady  had  no  issue.  His  second  wife  was  Janet,  daughter  of 
Sir  William  Maitland  of  Lethington,  ancestor  to  the  present  Earl  of  Lauderdale,  by 
whom  he  had 

James,  his  successor,  and  Hugh  (of  whom  are  descended  the  Somervilles  of 
Spittle);  also  three  daughters,  Janet,  married  to  Sir  Charles  Murray  of  Cockpool, 
from  whom  descended  John  Murray  of  Lochmaben,  first  Viscount  of  Annan,  and 
afterwards  Earl  of  Annandale;  Marjory,  the  second,  to  James  Tweedie  of  Drjmel- 
zier,  an  ancient  family  in  the  county  of  Tweeddale :  Margaret,  the  third  daughter, 
was  married  to  Sir  John  Carmichael  of  that  Ilk,  Captain  of  his  Majesty's  Guards, 
ancestor  to  the  present  Earl  of  Hyndford. 
a 


APPENDIX.  75 

James  Lord  Somejiville,  together  with  the  Earl  of  Athol,  and  the  Lord  Borth- 
wick,  made  the  strongest  opposition  to  the  Reformation,  when  it  was  debated  in. 
Parliament  anno  1560.  This  lord  married  Agnes,  daughter  of  Sir  James  Hamilton 
of  Finart,  first  Baron  of  Evandale,  by  whom  he  had  Hugh,  his  successor,  and 
one  daughter,  married  to  Sir  Alexander  Jardine  of  Applegirth. 

Hugh  Lord  So.merville  was  a  man  ot  great  parts,  and  long  of  the  Privy  Council 
to  King  James  VL  He  married  Eleanor,  daughter  of  George  Lord  Seaton,  an- 
cestor to  the  Earls  of  Winton,  by  whom  he  had  four  sons;  William,  master  of 
Somerville,  a  young  nobleman  of  great  hopes,  who  was  unfortunately  shot  by  his 
second  brother  John,  who  likewise  died  in  his  father's  lifetime;  Gilbert,  the  third 
son,  became  his  father's  successor,  and  Hugh,  the  fourth  son,  had  for  his  patrimony 
the  lands  of  Drum,  Gilmerton  and  Goodtrees,  by  whom  the  male  line  of  this  noble 
family  has  since  been  preserved. 

Gilbert  Lord  So.merville  being  a  very  weak  man,  and  greatly  imposed  upon, 
consumed  his  whole  estate,  v^hich  was  very  considerable,  and  dying,  anno  1618,. 
without  issue,  the  honours  came  to  his  brother  Hugh  Somerville  of  Drum  :  But  as 
he  had  not  the  estate  which  formerly  belonged  to  this  noble  family,  he  deferred 
taking  the  title  of  Lord  Somerville;  and  thus  this  ancient  title  lay  dormant  for 
the  space  of  104  years,  being  from  1618  to  1722,  when  James  Sqmerville  of  Drum, 
the  fifth  in  a  dnect  succession  from  the  above-mentioned  Hugh,  twenty-fifth  in  a 
lineal  male  descent  from  Sir  Gualtier,  who  came  first  into  England  with  AVilliam 
theConqueror,  and  the  fourteenth  Lord  Somerville,  claimed  thisancienttitle ;  and  by 
application  to  his  Majesty  and  the  House  of  Lords  of  Great  Britain,  has  had  the 
same  confirmed  as  his  undoubted  right,  and  by  order  of  Parliament  is  now  restored 
to  the  ancient  rank  of  his  noble  ancestors.  His  Lordship,  in  1724  ,married  Anne, 
the  only  daughter  of  Henry  Baynton,  of  the  county  of  Wilts,  Esq.  by  Lady  Anne,, 
eldest  daughter  and  co-heir  of  Wilmot  Earl  of  Rochester. 


STEWART  OF  ARDVOR.LICH. 


THE  family  of  Baldorran,  which  is  now  represented  by  Robert  Stewart  of 
Ardvorlich,  Esq.  is  lineally  descended  from  James  More,  (so  called,  in  the  Irish 
language  from  the  tallness  of  his  stature)  one  of  the  younger  sons  of  Murdoch 
Duke  of  Albany,  who  was  Governor  of  Scotland  dunng  the  minority  of  King 
James  I.  Which  James,  upon  the  tragical  death  of  his  father  Duke  Murdoch,  and 
the  unhappy  disaster  of  his  two  elder  brothers,  Walter  and  Alexander,  (who  were 
all  of  them  beheaded  at  Stirling  in  May  1425)  thought  fit  to  retire  to  Ireland, 
where  he  continued  all  his  Hfetime.  He  left  behind  him  several  sons,  amongst 
whom  were,  first,  Andrew,  his  eldest,  who  was,  by  King'James  II.  created  Lord 
Evandale  in  the  year  1459,  ^^^  afterwards,  by  King  James  III.  Chancellor  of 
S.otla.id,  anno  1461;  second,  Walter  Stewart  of  Morphy,  whose  son,  Alexander, 
succeeded  his  uncle,  Andrew  Lord  Evandale,  in  his  estate  and  honours;  third, 
Arthur;  fourth,  James  Stewart  of  Baldorran  ;  of  which  last,  who,  from  the  small- 
n-^ss  of  his  stature,  is  commonly  called  James  Beg,  /.  e.  Little  James,  is  lineally 
descended  the  family  of  Ardvorlich,  as  is  plain  from  the  following  deduction. 

I.  The  first  mention  I  have  found  of  the  foresaid  J.ames  Beg  Stewart  is 
in  a  charter  granted  by  Isabel  Dutchess  of  Albany,  and  Countess  of  Lennox, 
relict  of  the  above  Duke  Murdoch,  of  a  certain  tenement  of  land  in  Drymen 
of  Lennox,  dated  in  the  year  1443  ;  in  which  charter  he  is  designed  by  the 
said  dutchess  Nepote  nostra.  Afterwards,  in  anno  1464,  he  obtained,  by  the 
grant  of  his  cousin,  John  Stewart  Lord  Darnly,  the  lands  of  Baldorran,  lying 
withm  the  earldom  of  Lennox,  and  shire  of  Stirling;  as  is  evident  from  a  charter 
still  extant   in  the   pubhc  records,   whereby  Johannes  Stewart  Dominiis  de  Dernle, 

gives,  "  Dilecto  consanguineo  suo  Jacobo  Stewart  de  Albania &.c.  totara 

"  &•  integram  mediara  partem  orientalem  omnium  terrarum  mearum  de  Baldorran, 


'l6  APPENDIX. 

"  cum  pertinentiis,  jacent.  in  comitatu  de  Levenax,  infra  vicecomitatum  de  Stri- 
"  velyn. — Datum  apud  Strivelyn  septimo  die  mensis  Januarii,  anno  Domini  1464, 
"  his  tcstibus,  Andrea  domino  Avandale  cancellario  Scotioe,  magistro  Georgio  de 
"  Abernethy,  pra:posito  ecclesiic  collegiatae  de  Dumbeitane, — Murdaco  Stewart 
"  milite, — Matthseo  Stewart  de  Cassiltoune,  Johanne  Maxwell  de  Nether- Pollock,— 
"  magistro  Andrea  de  Monteith,  cum  multis  aiiis."  This  charter  is  confirmed  by 
King  James  111.  January  12th  1464.  I'lde  Chart.  51.  Lihri  7.  Arch.  pub.  The 
above  James  Stewart  of  Baldorran  married  Annabella  Buchanan,  daughter  to 
Patrick  Buchanan  of  that  Ilk,  as  evinceth  a  charter  in  his  and  the  said  Anna- 
bella's  favours,  upon  his  own  resignation,  of  the  lands  of  Duchlash,  "  jacentes  in 
"  comitatu  de  Levenax,  infra  vicecomitatum  de  Dumbertane."  This  charter, 
which  is  granted  by  King  James  III.  is  dated  also  in  the  year  1464.  l^ide  Chart. 
54.  Lib.  7  Arch.  pub. 

II.  William  Stewart  of  Baldorran,  son  to  the  said  James  Beg,  married  Mariota 
Campbell,  daughter  to  Colin  Campbell  of  Glenorchy,  ancestor  to  the  Earl  of 
Breadalbane;  as  evidently  appears  by  a  charter  in  both  their  favours,  granted  by 
Kobert  Mcnzies  of  Comrie,  "  De  terris  de  Emyr-crechane,  &■  Crostynterray  jacent. 
"  in  comitatu  de  Strathern,  infra  vicecomitatum  de  Perth,  dilectis  nostris  Williel- 
"  mo  Stewart  de  Baldorran,  pro  toto  tempore  vitae  suae,  &-  post  ejus  decessum  Ma- 
"  riotas  Campbell,  filiae  Colini  Campbell  de  Glenurquhay,  pro  toto  tempore  vitas 
"  suae,  &.  post  ejus  decessum  Waltero  Stewart,  filio  dictorum  Willielmi  &.  Mariotae, 
"  &•  hasredibus  suis,  &c. — Datum  apud  Loch-tay,  fto  Octobris  1498. — Coram  his 
"  testibus  Duncano  Campbell  de  Glenurquhay,  Johanne  Campbell  de  Achreach," 
&.C.  This  charter  is  confirmed  by  King  James  IV.  October  25.  1498.  Fide  Lib. 
13.  Chart.  358.  Arch.  pub. 

III.  Walter  Stewart  of  Baldorran,  son  to  the  above  William,  and  Mariota 
Campbell,  Glenorchy's  daughter,  succeeded  his  father  in  the  lands  of  Baldorran. 
He  obtained  from  King  James  IV.  a  charter  of  confirmation,  whereby  the  king 
gives  him  "  Totas  &  integras  quinque  mercatas  antiqui  extentus  terrarum  de 
"  Duchlash,  jacent.  in  dominio  de  Rosneath,  infra  vicecomitatum  nostrum  de  Dum- 
"  bartane.— Datum  apud  Falkland,  Septemb.  14.  1500."  Fide  Lib.  13.  Chart,  370. 
Arch.  pub.  This  Walter  Stewart  sold  the  lands  of  Baldorran  to  William  Livmg- 
ston  of  Kilsyth,  ancestor  to  the  Viscount  of  Kilsyth,  about  the  year  1524,  and 
afterwards  purchased  from  one  Janet  Oquhanan  a  wadset-right  she  had  upon  some 
of  the  lands  of  Strathyre,  in  the  shire  of  Perth,  as  appears  by  a  charter  in  his  fa- 
vours of  the  said  lands,  dated  anno   1528.     He  married daughter 

to by  whom  he  had  Walter  his  successor,  ancestor  to  the  family  of 

Ardvorlich;  as  also  two  younger  sons,  who  are  commonly  reckoned  predecessors  to 
the  families  of  Gartnafuaro  and  Glenbuckie. 

Now,  although  of  late  both  these  families  last  mentioned  have  controverted  the 
above  account,  with  respect  to  the  primogeniture  of  the  three  brothers,  each  pre- 
tending his  own  predecessor  was  the  eldest,  and  consequently  the  true  representer 
of  the  Stewarts  of  Baldorran ;  yet  it  seems  to  be  pretty  clear  that  the  family  of 
Ardvorlich  has  the  bdst  title  to  it,  as  will  evidently  appear  from  the  following 
reasons. 

xmo.  By  the  constant  and  inviolable  tradition  of  the  whole  country,  the  family 
of  Ardvorlich  has  been  always  acknowledged  as  the  posterity  of  the  eldest  of  the 
three  brothers;  to  confirm  which,  it  is  asserted  that  the  said  James  Beg,  the  com- 
mon ancestor  to  the  above  three  families,  having,  in  his  travels  abroad,  purchased 
and  brought  home  with  him  two  famous  medicinal  stones,  which  were  very  much 
esteemed,  and  looked  upon  as  a  sovereign  remedy  for  several  distempers  incident 
to  mankind,  as  also  very  necessary  for  curing  most  diseases  in  cattle;  to  which  use 
they  are  still  applied  with  very  good  success  :  Now  these  stones,  because  of  their 
rare  medicinal  virtues,  are,  by  uncontroverted  tradition,  said  to  have  been  the  inse- 
parable badges  of  primogeniture  in  the  family  of  Baldorran,  and  to  have  been 
lineally  transmitted  from  father  to  son,  m  a  direct  male  line,  from  the  said  James 
Beg  to  the  present  Ardvorlich,  in  whose  possession  one  of  them  still  continues,  the 
other  being  given  away,  as  an  extraordinary  present,  by  Alexander,  one  of  his  pre- 
decessors, to  one  of  the  Earls  of  Murray. 


APPENDIX.  77 

•zdo.  The  almost  universal  consent  of  the  cadets,  not  only  of  the  family  of  Ard- 
vorlich  itself,  but  also  of  several  of  the  cadets  of  the  families  of  Gartnafuaro  and 
Glenbuckie,  who  have  on  several  occasions  acknowledged  Ardvorlich  to  be  the  true 
representer  of  James  Beg. 

3//0,  It  has  been  always  a  custom  in  the  Highlands  for  the  heads  of  families,  and 
no  other  but  these,  to  have  a  patronymical  designation,  taken  either  from  the  name 
of  the  lirst  founder  of  the  family,  or  of  the  most  remarkable  person  amongst  the 
predecessors  of  the  family:  Thus  the  Duke  of  Argyle  is  called  in  the  Irish  lan- 
guage Mac-Cnilain-More,  i.  e.  the  son  of  Colin  the  Great,  as  being  lineally  de- 
scended from  Sir  Colin  Campbell  of  Lochow,  who  was  a  fomous  man  in  the  reign 
of  King  Alexander  111.  The  Earl  of  Breadalbane  is  called  Mac-Cullain-vic- 
Dhonochie,  i.  e.  the  son  of  Colin  the  son  of  Duncan ;  because  he  represents  .Sir 
Colin  Campbell  first  Laird  of  Glcnorchy,  who  was  son  to  Duncan  first  Lord  Camp- 
bell :  So  Ardvorlich  is  always  called  Mac-vic-Vaultii\  i.  e.  the  grandson  of  Wal- 
ter; because  he  is  the  true  representer  of  Walter  Stewart  of  Baldorran,  grandson 
to  James  Beg,  who  was  the  first  of  the  family  that  settled  in  the  shire  of  Perth. 

4.'o,  It  is  also  a  very  usual  custom  in  the  Highlands  for  the  heads  of  families  to 
be  distinguished  from  the  cadets,  by  a  denomination  taken  from  the  place  of  re- 
sidence of  some  of  their  ancestors;  and  it  being  acknowledged  by  all  the  three 
families  above  mentioned,  that  the  usual  residence  of  the  Stewarts  of  Baldorran, 
for  some  time,  was  in  a  small  island  of  Lochvennacher  in  Strathgartney ;  which 
makes  it  very  probable,  that  this  is  the  reason  why  the  family  of  Ardvorlich,  as  now 
representing  Stewart  of  Baldorran,  has  ever  since  been  called  in  the  Irish  language 
Sliochd-ty-an-oileaii,  i.  e.  the  Offspring  of  the  House  of  the  Island.     But  to  return, 

IV  Walter  Stewart  above-mentioned,  who   sold  the   lands  of  Baldorran  in 

1524,  was  succeeded  by  his  son  called  also  Walter,  who  married 

daughter  to by  whom  he  had 

V.  Alexander  Stewart  of  Ardvorlich  his  successor,  who  married 

Drummond,  daughter  to  David  Drummond  of  Drummond-Erinach;   and  had  by 
her, 

VI.  James  Stewart  of  Ardvorlich,  his  successor,  who  was  first  made  Captain  of 
one  of  the  Independent  Companies,  for  suppressing  of  theft  in  the  Highlands,  in  anno 
1642,  and  afterwards  Major  to  the  Marquis  of  Argyle's  Regiment  of  Foot ;  as  ap- 
pears by  his  commission,  dated  October  24th  1648.  He  marrried  Barbara,  daugh- 
ter to  Robert  Murray  of  Buchanty,  a  cadet  of  the  family  of  Abercairny  ;  by  whom 
he  had, 

VII.  Robert  Stewart  of  Ardvorlich,  who  took  to  wife  Jean,  daughter  to  Da- 
vid Drummond  of  Comrie  ;  and  had  by  her,  ' 

VIII.  Jaimes  Stewart  of  Ardvorlich,  his  successor,  who  married  Elizabeth,  only 
child  of  the  first  marriage,  to  John  Buchanan  last  Laird  of  Buchanan  ;  by  whom 
he  had, 

IX.  Robert  Stewart,  now  of  Ardvorlich,  his  successor,  &c. 

From  what  is  above  said,  it  evidently  appears  that  th.e  present  Robert  Stewart 
of  Ardvorlich  is  not  only  the  true  representer  of  James  Beg  Stewart  of  Baldorran, 
grandchild  to  Mi.i};doch  Duke  of  Albany,  but  also  heir  of  line  to  the  old  family  of 
Buchanan,  as  representing  his  grandfather  John,  last  Laird  of  Buchanan,  who  was 
twice  married,  first  to  Mrs  Mary  Erskine,  daughter  to  the  Lord  Cardross,  by  whom 
he  had  Elizabeth  the  present  Ardvorlich's  mother.  He  married  to  his  second  wife 
one  Mrs  Jean  Pringle,  by  whom  he  had  only  one  daughter,  Janet,  married  to 
Henry  Buchanan  of  Leny.  As  to  that  objection  which  is  raised  by  some  friends 
of  the  family  of  Buchanan,  that  Ardvorlich's  mother  forfeited  her  right  of  succes- 
sion, by  marrying  without  consent  of  her  father  and  other  friends,  it  is  answered, 
that  the  Laird  of  Buchanan  was  not  in  Scotland  when  his  daughter  married  Ard- 
vorlich ;  but  as  soon  as  he  came  home,  he  gave  a  declaration  under  his  hand, 
dated  anno  1680,  which  is  in  the  possession  of  the  present  Ardvorlich,  wherein  he 
acknowledges,  that  his  daughter  Elizabeth,  now  married  to  James  Stewart,  fiar 
of  Ardvorlich,  is  competently  matched  and  provided  ;  and  he  approves  of  the  said 
marriage  to  all  intents  and  purposes  that  may  follow  thereupon.  There  is  also 
another  paper  in  Ardvorlich's  custody,  wherein  all  the  said  lady's  friends  approve 
of  her  marriage  with  Ardvorlich,  amongst  whom  are  the  Earl  of  Marr,  the  Lord 

Vol.  II.  5  D 


^■s  APPENDIX. 

Cardross,  Sir  Charles  Erskine  of  Alva,  Erskine  of  Dun,  James  Stewart  of  Rosy  th, 
Hutcheson  of  Scotston,  Stc. 

There  are  descended  from  the  family  of  Ardvorlich  the  Stewarts  of  Annat,  Bal- 
lachallan,  Craigton,  Colonel  James  Stewart,  who  was  Deputy-Governor  of  the 
Castle  of  Edinburgh,  &-c.  as  also  several  others  in  Monteith,  Balquhidder,  and 
Strathgartney,  all  in  the  southern  parts  of  Perthshire. 

The  arms  of  this  family  are,  quarterly,  first  grand  quarter  counter-quartered, 
first  and  fourth  or,  a  lion  rampant,  within  a  double  tressure,  flowered  and  counter- 
flowered  with  flower-de-luces  ^u/es ;  second  o?;  a  fesse  cheque,  azure  and  ardent, 
and  in  chief  a  moUet  gi/Jes,  for  Stewart ;  third  argent,  a  saltier  ingrailed,  cantoned 
with  four  roses,  gules,  for  Lennox,  all  within  a  bordure  ingrailed  and  gobonated, 
azure  and  urgent ;  second  grand  quarter  or,  a  lion  rampant,  within  a  double  tres- 
sure, flowered  and  counter-flowered  sable,  for  Buchanan  of  that  Ilk  ;  third  grand 
quarter  as  the  second,  fourth  as  the  first. 

Crest,  a  dexter  hand  couped  at  the  elbow,  brandishing  a  broad-sword  aloft,  all. 
proper.     Motto,  Deojuvante  vinco. 


CHANCELLOR  of  Shieldhill. 


IT  is  presumed  that  the  surname  of  Chancellor  came  from  France,  at  the 
Norman  conquest,  with  the  Somervilles ;  to  support  which,  a  history  in  quarto^ 
printed  at  London  in  1710,  written  in  Latin  by  Degory  Wheare,  Camden  Reader 
in  the  University  of  Oxford,  and  Englished  by  Edmund  Bohun,  with  a  preftce  by 
Mr  DodwelL,  in  page  206,  which  mentions  one  Gualterus  Cancellarius  a  French 
liistorian,  to  have  travelled  in  Palestine  and  Antioch  ;  and,  after  his  return  to 
France,  to  have  writ  bis  h-istory  in  anno  1124,  by  which  it  appears  that  the  sur- 
name of  Chancellor  is  ancient  in  France,  where  there  is  of  that  surname  at  this 
present  time. 

It  is  generally  acknowledged  that  the  Chancellors  of  Shieldhill  are  an  ancient 
familv,  and  chief  of  their  surname  in  Scotland ;  and  though  what  is  above  said 
may  be  sufficient  to  instruct  the  antiquity  of  the  surname,  yet,  for  further  evi- 
dence, the  history  of  the  Lord  Somerville's  fiimily,  written  many  years  ago  by  the 
deceased  James  Somerville  of  Drum,  who  was  heir  and  representative  of  that  an- 
cient and  noble  family  of  Lord  Somerville,  and  great  grandfather  to  the  present 
Lord  Somerville,  mentions  that  there  was  a  firm  friendship  betwixt  the  house  of 
Lord  Somerville  and  Chancellor  of  Shieldhill  and  Qiiodquan,  as  early  as  the  time 
of  King  Robert  Bruce,  in  the  year  1317. 

By  the  carelessness  and  trouble  of  former  times,  the  oldest  writing  in  the  custo- 
dy of  the  present  John  Chancellor  of  Shieldhill  is  a  charter  in  common,  form,, 
granted  by  Thomas  Somerville  de  Carnwath,  to  George  Chancellor  of  Quodquan, 
upon  the  said  George's  resignation,  to  be  held  of  the  said  Lord  Somerville,  as  freely 
and  honourably  as  any  of  his  predecessors  held  tlie  same  of  him  or  his  Lordship's 
predecessors,  dated  6th  March  1434.  But  this  being  no  original  charter,  and  the 
lands  immemorially  their  own,  it  is  a  good  document  of  the  antiquity  of  the  family... 

The  above  George  was  succeeded  by  Alexander  his  son  and  heir,  designed  of 
Qiiodquan.  He  added  to  his  former  estate  several  lands,  of  which  there  is  a  char- 
ter from  John  Lord  Somerville,  anno  1460. 

George,  son  and  heir  to  the  above  Alexander,  resigned  his  lands  into  the  hands 
of  his  superior  Lord  Somerville  for  new  infeftment,  who  granted  charter,  dated. 
antio  i^yi,  wherein  he  is  designed,  "  Nobilis  vir  Georgius  Chanceler  dominus  de 
"  Qiiodquan."  He  had  by  his  wife,  a  daughter  of  Ramsay  of  Dalhousie,  an  only 
son  and  heir  William. 

The  said  William's  sasine,  in  favour  of  himself  and  his  wife  Janet  Geddes,, 
daughter  of  Geddes  of  Rachan  and  Kirkurd,  an  old  family  in  Tweeddale,  is  re- 
gistrate  zzd  November  1477.     He  was  succeeded  by  his  son  John. 


APPENDIX.  79 

The  said  John  is  infeft  by  charter  from  John  Lord  Somerville,  dated  nth  April 
1493.     He  had  by  his  wife  Mary  Douglas  his  son  Robert. 

The  said  Robert,  and  his  wife  Elizabeth  Brown,  daughter  of  Coalston,  an  old 
family  in  East  Lothian,  are  infeft  by  charter  from  Hugh  Lord  Somerville.  The 
sasine  is  dated  May  1529. 

William,  son  and  heir  to  the  last  Robert,  is  infeft  on  28th  March  1533.  He 
was  designed  of  Shieldhill,  Qiiodquan,  and  Cormiston.  He  had  by  his  wife  Mar- 
garet Hamilton,  daughter  of  Dalserf,  a  son  William. 

The  said  William's  sasine,  upon  charter  from  Hugh  Lord  Somerville,  is  dated 
17th  March  1546.  He  obtained  decreet  before  the  Lords  in  anno  1566,  against 
Denholm  of  Westbhield,  and  Inglis  of  Eastshield,  for  non-entry  duties,  they  being 
both  his  vassals,  and  continue  so.  He  had  by  Agnes,  daughter  of  Sir  John  Hamil- 
ton of  Crawfordjohn,  Baron  of  Evandale,  and  sister  of  Sir  James  Hamilton  of 
Libberton,  a  son  Robert. 

The  said  Robert  is  infeft  by  sasine,  dated  14th  May  1583.  He  took  the  title 
only  of  Shieldhill.  He  had  by  Agnes,  daughter  of  Symington  of  that  Ilk,  an  an- 
cient family  on  Clyde,  a  son  John. 

The  said  John's  sasine  is  dated  1605.  He  had  by  Katharine,  daughter  of  Gavin 
Hamilton  of  Raploch,  and  of  Jean  his  wife,  daughter  and  one  of  the  co-heirs  of 
Sir  Thomas  Dishington  of  Ardross,  a  son  Robert. 

The  said  Robert's  sasine  is  dated  1642.  He  signalized  himself  in  loyalty  to 
King  Charles  I.  and  U.  and  lived  to  see  the  happy  Restoration  in  1660.  He  had 
by  Jean  his  wife,  daughter  of  Sir  James  Lockhart  of  Lee,  and  Jean  Auchinleck, 
daughter  of 'Sir  George  Auchinleck  of  Balmanno,  a  son  James. 

James  Chancellor,  son  to  the  said  Robert,  his  charter  and  sasine  are  dated  May 
and  June  1664.  He  deceased  in  March  1704,  and  all  his  children  by  three  mar- 
riages, viz.  with  Roberton  of  Earnock,  Craig  of  Riccarton,  and  Livingston  of  Salt- 
coats deceasing,  he  was  succeeded  by  his  brother  John. 

John,  brother  and  heir  to  the  above  said  James,  now  possesses  the  estate  with 
some  more  purchased  by  him,  and  is  infeft  anno  1707  ;  part  of  the  said  estate  hold- 
ing of  the  crown  blench,  and  part  of  it  of  George  Lockhart  of  Carnwath  blench. 
He  was  first  married  to  Isabel  Johnstone,  daughter  to  Sir  James  Johnstone  of  Wester- 
hall  ;  and  next  married  to  Jean  Forbes,  daughter  to  Sir  John  Forbes  of  Waterton,. 
and  Dame  Jean  Gordon,  sister  to  the  deceased  George  Earl  of  Aberdeen.  He  is 
now  married  to  Jean  Agnew,  daughter  to  Sir  James  Agnew  of  Lochnaw,  Baronet, 
and  Lady  Mary,  sister  to  the  present  Alexander  Earl  of  Eglinton,  by  whom  he 
has  children,  whereof  Alexander  is  his  eldest  son  and  apparent  heir. 

Chancellor  of  Shieldhill  carries  or,  a  lion  rampant  sable,  armed  and  langued, 
gules,  on  a  chief  azure,  three  moUets,  alias  stars  of  the  first ;  crest,  an  eagle  dis- 
played sable  :  motto,  ^eje  surmonte. 


IVIACFARLANE  of  Kirkton. 


THE  ancestor  of  this  family  was  George  Macfarlanf.  of  Markmch,  second  sor. 
to  Andrew  Macfarlane  of  that  Ilk,  in  the  reign  of  King  James  V.  Which  Georgf: 
having  sold  the  foresaid  lands  of  Markinch,  went  afterwards  and  settled  in  the 
north  Highlands,  amongst  his  namesakes  the  Macfarlanes,  who  are  very  numerous 
in  that  country,  and  promiscuously  designed  in  the  Irish  language,  M' Allans, 
Allarrich,  or  Clan- Allan,  i.  e.  the  posterity  of  Allan,  because  of  their  descent  from 
Allan  Macfarlane,  younger  son  to  one  of  the  Lairds  of  Macfarlane,  who  settled 
it  Strathdown  in  Aberdeenshire,  several  centuries  ago.  From  him  are  descended 
the  families  of  Auchorrachan,  Balnengown,  Lismurdie,  &-c.  as  also  several  others 
in  Braemar,  Strathspey,  gtc  some  of  which  Allaniches  have  of  late  begun  to  call 
themselves  Stewarts,  grounding  the  change  of  their  name  upon  a  very  false  and 
mistaken  notion,  viz.  that  the  old  Earls  of  Lennox  were  of  the  surname  of  Stewart, 
when  the  Laird  of  Macfarlane's  predecessor  came  off  them ;  the  contrary  of  which 


So  APPENDIX. 

I  have  sufficiently  demonsti'ated  from  uncontroverted  documents,  in  my  account 
of  the  family  of  iVIacfarlane,  in  tliis  Appendix :  and  besides  it  can  easily  be  made 
appear,  that  there  never  was  an  Earl  of  Lennox  of  the  surname  of  Stewart,  until 
the  year  1483,  which  is  later  than  the  descent  of  the  said  M' Allans  from  the  fa 
mily  of  Mactarlane.  But  to  return,  the  said  George  Macfarlane's  posterity  con- 
tinued in  the  north  for  several  generations,  until  the  time  of  Patrick  Macfarlane, 
the  fourth  descendant  in  a  direct  line  from  the  said  George,  who,  returnuig  again 
to  the  south,  purchased  the  lands  of  Knkton,  in  Vkecomitatu  de  Strivelin,  from 
which  lands  his  posterity  have  ever  since   been  designed.     He   married  Christian 

Blair,  daughter Blair,  Commissary  of  Glasgow,  who  was  younger 

son  to Blair  of  that  Ilk,  an   ancient  family  in   the   shire  of  Ayr,  by 

whom  he  had  James  Macfarlane  of  Kirkton,  his  successor,  and  a  daughter,  Chris- 
tian, married  to  Sir  Hugh  Wallace  of  Wolmet.  Which  James  married  Mary 
Keith,  daughter  to  John  Keith,  who  was  younger  son  to  the  Earl  Marischal  of 
Scotland,  by  whom  he  had  Hugh  Macfarlane  of  Kirkton,  his  successor,  who  mar- 
ried Elizabeth  Doig,  daughter,  and  at  length  sole  heiress  to  Paul  Doig  of  Ballin- 
grew,  a  very  ancient  family  in  the  shire  of  Perth,  by  whom  he  has,  besides  Wil- 
liam Macfarlane  his  son  and  heir,  a  numerous  issue  both  of  sons  and  daughters. 

The  armorial  bearing  of  the  family  of  Kirkton  is,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth 
argent,  a  saltier  wavey,  cantoned  with  four  xoits gules,  as  a  cadet  of  Macfarlane  of 
that  Ilk  ;  second  and  third,  gules,  a  cheveron  betwixt  two  cinquefoils  in  chief,  and 
a  sword  pale-ways,  argent,  hilted  and  pommelled,  or,  in  base  for  Doig  of  Ballin- 
grew ;  crest,  a  demi-savage  proper,  holding  in  his  dexter  hand  a  sheaf  of  arrows, 
and  pointing  with  his  sinister  to  an  imperial  crown,  or.  Motto,  This  I'll  defend. 
Vide  Plate  of  Achievements. 


ARBUTHNOT  Viscount  of  Arbuthnot. 


THE  armorial  bearing  of  this  family  is  azure,  a  crescent  betwixt  three  stars 
argent,  supported  by  two  dragons,  with  their  wings  expanded,  and  tails  nuved 
vert,  spouting  out  fire,  proper ;  crest,  a  peacock's  head  proper,  beaked  or  :  motto, 
Laiis  Deo. 

This  is  a  local  surname  taken  from  the  lands  of  Arbuthnot,  lying  in  the  shire  of 
Merns  or  Kincardine  ;  it  was  anciently  and  originally  written  Aberbothenotb,  but 
now  contracted  Arbuthnot.  There  is  a  particular  history  of  this  family  in  M.  S.  inti- 
tuled Originis  is'  incrementi  Arbuthnoticce  familice  descriptio  historica,  ubi  vera  nobi- 
Htatis  ratio  13  series  succincte  ac  explicate  pertractatur,  written  in  a  pretty  good 
Latin  stile  by  the  famous  Mr  Alexander  Arbuthnot,  who  was  Principal  of  the 
King's  College  at  Aberdeen,  about  the  time  of  the  Reformation.  The  learned 
author  himself  was  a  grandchild  of  the  family,  as  will  appear  hereafter,  but  not 
an  immediate  son,  as  (a)  Dr  Mackenzie  affirms.  His  History  of  the  Arbuthnots 
has  been  since  continued  to  the  time  of  King  Charles  I.  by  Mr  Alexander  Ar- 
buthnot, some  time  Parson  of  Arbuthnot.  There  are  also  a  great  many  valuable 
original  documents  relating  to  the  antiquity  of  this  family,  in  the  hands  of  the 
present  Viscount  of  Arbuthnot ;  which,  together  with  several  collections  gathered 
out  of  our  public  archives,  ancient  (5)  chartularies,  and  national  historians,  both 
in  print  and  manuscript,  &tc.  are  the  materials  out  of  which  the  following  account 
is  composed. 

I.  The  first  of  this  surname  that  I  have  found  on  record  is  Hugo  de  Aber- 
BOTHENOTH,  promiscuously  designed  in  old  writs  Dominus  and  2'hanus  de  Aberbothe- 
noth,  who  was  possessor  of  the  lands  of  Arbuthnot  about  the  year  1160:  But 
whether  he '  acquired   these  lands  by  marrying  the  daughter  of  Osbertus  Olifard, 

(fl)  Dr  Mackenzie's  Lives  of  Scots  Writers,  vol.  iii.  page  l86'  {b)  Particularly  the  two  chartularies 
ef  Aberbrothockj  in  the-Lawyers'  IJbrary  at  Edinburgh. 


APPENDIX.  ai 

Sheriff  of  the  Merns,  as  Sir  George  Mackenzie  says  (c),  or  by  conquest,  or  other- 
wise, cannot,  at  this  distance  of  time,  be  so  easily  determined.  What  is  most  cer- 
tain, is,  that  he  had  a  long  contest  with  the  Bishop  of  St  Andrews,  concerning  the 
property  of  the  Kirkton  of  Arbuthnot,  which  was  not  determined  until  the  time 
of  his  son  Duncan  ;  of  which  more  hereafter.  1  find  also  at  this  time  several 
famous  men  of  the  surname  of  Arbuthnot,  particularly  one  Richardus  de  Abfi- 
buth/iot,  Clcricvs  Regis,  who  is  so  designed  in  a  charter  of  exemption  granted  by 
John  Abbot  of  K.elso  to  Reginald,  then  elected  to  be  Abbot  of  Aberbrothock,  freeing 
him  from  his  obedience  and  subjection  to  the  abbot  of  Kelso,  (fi)  dated  in  the 
year  1178. 

II.  DuNGANus  DE  Aberbothenoth,  soh  and  successor  to  the  said  Hugo,  con- 
tinued the  foresaid  contest  with  the  Bishop  of  St  Andrews,  concerning  the  pro- 
perty of  the  Kirkton  of  Arbuthnot ;  which  was  at  last  finally  determined  against 
iiim  by  an  assembly  of  ecclesiastics  holden  at  Perth  in  the  year  1206,  as  evidently 
appears  by  the  original  sentence  of  that  synod,  which  is  still  extant,  and  in  the 
possession  of  the  (f)  family  of  Arbuthnot.  The  sentence  itself  being  somewhat 
curious,  and  withal  not  very  long,  I  shall  here  subjoin  verbatim  from  the  originals 
whereby  it  will  appear  that  neither  the  stile  nor  method  of  procedure  of  those 
times  was  so  barbarous  as  some  people,  now  a-days,  are  apt  to  imagine. 

"  Patricius  de  Durofermeyln,  et  Henricus  de  Aberbroth,  et  Reimbaldus  de 
"  Scone,  et  Guuido  de  Lundores  Abbates ;  et  Thomas  de  Sancto  Andrea,  et 
"  Johannes  de  May,  et  Berengarius  de  Restinoth  Priores  ;  et  Ranulfus  Archidia- 
"  conus  de  Sancto  Andrea,  et  decani  et  clerici  qui  interfuerunt  sinodo  apud  Pert 
"  tertio  idus  Apiilis,  anno  ab  incarnatione  Domini,  mccvi.  Omnibus  has  literas 
"  visuris  vel  audituris,  eternam  in  Domino  salutem.  Noverit  universitas  vestra, 
"  quod  causa  que  vertebatur  inter  Willielmum  bone  memorie  episcopum  Sancti 
"  Andree,  ex  una  parte,  et  Duncanum  de  Aberbuthenoth  ex  alia  parte,  super  terra 
"  de  Aberbuthenoth,  que  appellatur  Kirketun,  quam  idem  episcopus  ad  ecclesiani 
"  Sancti  Andree,  de  jure  spectare  dicebat,  qua  etiam  predictus  Duncanus  eandem 
"  ecclesiam,  pretermisso  juris  ordine  spoliavit,  ut  asserebat :  Finem  legittimum  in 
"  hunc  modum  auctoritate  sinodi  generalis  est  sortita  :  Sciz.  Quod  audita  propo- 
"  sitione  juris  quod  idem  episcopus,  in  predicta  terra  se  habere  dicebat,  audita 
"  etiam  contradictione  partis  adverse,  per  testes  omni  exceptione  majores,  veritate 
"  plenius  inquisita  et  cognita,  communi  assensu  omnium  qui  intererant  sinodo  def- 
"  finitivam  sententiam  promulgavimus,  tam  possessionem  quam  proprietatem  ejus- 
"  dem  terre,  et  hominum  qui  in  ea  manserint,  ecclesie  Sancti  Andree,  et  eidem 
"  Willielmo  episcopo  adjudicantes,  et  prefato  Duncano,  et  successoribus  suis,  per- 
"  petuum  silentium  imponentes :  Et  ut  processus  negocii  plenius  possit  inno- 
"  tescere,  attestationes  quarum  auctoritate  predictam  sententiam  protulimus 
"  inferius  scribi  dignum  ducimus.     Sunt   autem   hx   attestationes.     Johannes  de 

"  Hastinkes  juratus  dicit,  &c." The  depositions  of  the  witnesses  being  too 

long  to  be  here  inserted,  I  shall  not  trouble  the  reader  with  them  at  present,  but 
only  take  notice,  that  through  the  injury  of  time  there  remains  only  one  seal  en- 
tire {i.  e.  that  of  the  chapter  of  St  Andrews)  of  eight,  which  by  as  many  tags 
or  labels  still  remaining  appear  to  have  been  appended  to  it. 

III.  Hugo  de  Aberbothenoth,  the  second  of  that  name,  and  third  Laird  of  Ar- 
buthnot succeeded  his  father  Duncan.  I  find  him  witness  together  with  his  father, 
who  is  tliere  designed  Dominus  Duncanus  de  Aberbothenoth,  to  a  charter,  whereby 
Robertus  filius  Waniebaldi  13  Richenda  sponsa  sua  gives  to  the  monastery  of  Aber- 
brothock, totum  feodum  (/)  nostrum  in  parochia  de  Fordunjn  Meornis,sciz.  duas  Tu- 

bertathas,  ^  Glenferkerin,  13  Kynkel,    13  Cuibac,  &<.c.     He  married 

daughter  to by  whom  he  had 

IV.  Hugo  de  Aberbothenoth,  the  third  of  that  name,  who  in  old  charters  is 
commonly  designed  Hugo  Blundus,  or  Hugo  le  Blond  Dominus  de  Aberbotheiwth  ; 
which  epithet  of  Zr  Blond  was  given  him  from  the  flaxen  colour  of  his  hair.  This 
Hugh  was  a  liberal  benefactor  to  the  clergy,  for  he  gave,  in  anno  1282,  to  the 

(f )  Sir  George  Mackenzie's  Baronage  of  Scotland,  MS.  (//)  Smaller  chartulary  of  Aberbrothock  in 
the  Lawyers'  Library,  charta  2.  fol.  verso  35.  (e)  Original  decreet  of  Perth,  anno  1206,  in  the  Vis- 
count of  Arbuthnot's  charter-chest.     (/)  Chartulary  of  Aberbrothock. 

Vol.  II.  5  E 


S2  APPENDIX. 

monks  of  Aberbrothock,  "  in  puram  et  perpetuam  elemosinam,  unam  bovatam 
"  teiTX,  in  qua  sita  est  ecclesia  de  Garvoch,  cum  jure  patronatus  ejusdem  ecclesie, 
"  et  cum  communi  pastura,  ad  centum  oves,  quatuor  equos,  decern  boves,  vigmti 

"  vaccas,  et  unum  taurum,  &.c.  Datum  apud  Aberbroth,  quarto  nonas 

"  August!  (^)  anno  Domini  millesimo,  ducentesimOi  octogesimo  secundo.     Testi- 

"  bus,  Johanne  de  Montios  clerico Domino  Adam  vicario  de  Monyfuth 

"  Fergus  avunculo  meo Thoma  de  Kinnarde  Malisio  de  Eduyn,  Hu- 

"  gone  Eeme,  et  multis  aliis."  The  original  donation  (which  I  have  seen)  is  still 
in  the  hands  of  his  successor  the  Viscount  of  Arbuthnot,  to  which  the  said  Hugo's 
seal  is  appended,  and  very  entire  to  this  day,  having  thereon  a  crescent  and  a  star, 

which,  with  a  very  little  variation,  is  still  the  arms  of  the  family.  This 

Hugh  died  about  the  end  of  the  thirteenth  century,  and  was  buried  amongst  his 
ancestors  in  the  burial-place  of  the  family  at  the  church  of  Arbuthnot,  where  his 
statue  is  still  to  be  seen  cut  in  stone,  at  the  full  length,  in  a  lying  posture,  to- 
gether with  his  own  and  his  lady's  arms,  which  are  three  cheverons,  of  whose 
quality  and  parentage,  although  the  history  of  the  family  be  altogether  silent,  yet, 
from  the  identity  of  the  arms,  it  seems  very  probable  that  she  was  a  daughter,  os 
at  least  a  very  near  relation,  of  the  great  and  ancient  family  of  the  Morvilles,  who 
were  constables  of  Scotland  for  several  generations,  and  who  bore  precisely  the 
same  arms,  as  appears  by  several  charters  still  extant  (A),  to  which  their  seals  are 
appended. 

V.  DuNCANus  DE  Aberbothenoth,  the  second  of  that  name,  and  fifth  Laird  of 
Arbuthnot,  succeeded  his  father  Hugh  le  Blond.     He  died  at  his  mansion-house  of 

Arbuthnot,  December  13th,  anno  1314,  (;')  leaving  -ssue  by his  wife, 

daughter  to a  son  of  the  same  name. 

VI.  DuNCANUs  DE  Aberbothenoth,  Dominus  de  Aberbothenoth,  who  having  (JC) 
survived  his  father  but  a  short  time,  was  succeeded  by  his  son 

VII.  Hugo  de  Aberbuthnott,  the  fourth  of  that  name,  and  seventh  Laird  of 
Arbuthnot,  who  lived  about  the  beginning  of  the  reign  of  King  David  II.  Of 
him  there  is  little  to  be  found  on  record  (/)  only  that  he  was  father  to 

VIII.  Philippus  de  Aberbuthnott,  Darninus  ejusdem,  who  imitated  the  piety  of 
his  ancestors,  in  his  liberality  to  the  church  and  clergy  ;  for  he  gave  in  pure 
alms  "  fratribus  Carmel.  burgi  de  Aberdeen,"  as  the  charter  itself,  (?;/)  yet  extant, 
expressly  bears,  "  pro  salute  animoe  meas,  parentum  et  amicorum  meorum,  unum 
"  annuum  redditum  tredecim  solidorum  et  quatuor  denariorum  sterlingorum,  an- 
"  nuatim  provenientem  de  tota  et  Integra  terra  mea  de  Aberbuthnot,  ad.  emenda- 
"  tionem  fabricae  ecclesiae  fratrum  praedictorum,  &-c.  Datum  apud  Aberdeen, 
"  25  die  mensis  Aprilis,  anno  Domini  1355."  This  is  afterwards  confirmed  by 
King  David  II.  "  apud  Aberdeen,   17    die  mensis    Augusti,  anno  regni  nostri  tri- 

"  cesimo  septimo,"  (/.  f.)  anno  1366  («).     He  married  first Keith, 

daughter  to  Sir  William  Keith,  Lord  Marischal  of  Scotland  (0),  by  whom  he  had 
no  male  issue  :  And  after  her  decease  he  married  Margaret,  daughter  to  Sir  James 
Douglas  of  Dalkeith  (p),  ancestor  to  the  Earl  of  IMorton,  by  Agnes  Dunbar  his 
wife,  daughter  to  the  Earl  of  March  (y)  ;  by  her  he  had  Hugh  his  successor,  and 
a  daughter,  Margaret,  married  to  (r)  Sir  William  Monypenny,  who  was  afterwards 
Lord  Monypenny. 

IX.  Hugh  Arbuthnot  of  that  Ilk,  the  fifth  of  that  name,  succeeded  his  father. 
Philip.     Sir  George   Mackenzie,  in  his  Genealogical  Collections,  says  (j),  that  he 

had  seen  a  certificate  under  the  hand  and  seal  of Johnston,  Steward 

of  Fife,  dated  at  Falkland,  September  i.  142 1,  whereby  it  appears  that  Hugh 
Arbuthnot  of  that  Ilk,  with  several  other  gentlemen  in  the  shire  of  Merns,  who, 
upon  great  provocation  given  them,  had  been  accessory  to  the  slaughter  of  John 
i\Ielville  of  Glenbervie,  having  laid  claim  to  the  privileges  of  Clan-Macduff,  were 

(^)  Larger  chartulary  'of  Aberbrothock  in  the  Lawyers'  library,  folio,  verso  7.  etiam  charta  originalis 
penes  vicecomitem  de  Arbuthnot.  (A)  Charta  penes  Mathaium  Smclar  de  Hermistoun.  \J)  Orig. 
&  Increm.  Familise  Arbuthnoticae,  &c.  (f)  Ibidem.  (/)  Ibidem.  (m)  In  Bib.  Col.  Mariscal. 
AbredoniiE.  (n)  Charta  161  codicis  Davidls  II.  in  publicis  arcbivis.  (0)  Orig.  &  Increment.  Fami- 
liffi  Arbuthnot.  MS.  {p)  Charta  penes  Comitem  de  Morton  ad  annum  1372.  (y)  Crawfurd's  Peer- 
age, page  350.  (r)  Orig.  &  Increment.  FamiliK  Arthbutnoticse,  MS.  (s)  Sir  George  Mackenzie's 
Baronage  of  Scotland,  MS. 

I 


APPENDIX.  83 

assoilzied  from  the  said  slaughter,  as  being  within  the  ninth  degree  of  kin  to 
Macduff  Earl  of  Fife.  He  married  Margaret,  daughter  to  Sir  Robert  Keith,  an- 
cestor to  the  Earl  Marischal  (t),  by  whom  he  had  Robert  his  successor,  and  also  a 
daughter,  Margaret,  married  to  Andrew  Menzies,  Provost  of  Aberdeen  («),  ances- 
tor to  the  family  of  Pitfoddels ;  and,  having  lived  to  a  very  great  age,  he  at  last 
made  his  exit  out  of  this  world  in  the  year  1446  (.v),  being  succeeded  by  his 
son, 

X.  Robert  Arbuthnot  of  that  Ilk,  who,  during  the  lifetime  of  his  father,^  mar- 
ried Giles,  daughter  to  Sir  Walter  Ogilvie  of  Lintrathan  (a)  Lord  High  Treasurer 
of  Scotland,  ancestor  to  the  Earl  of  Airly,  by  whom  he  had,  first,  David,  his  suc- 
cessor (b);  second,  Hugh  Arbuthnot  of  Balmaquin  and  Bryklie  (t-),  of  which 
estate  he  became  possessed  by  marrying  Janet  Balmaquin,  heiress  thereof;  third, 
Robert  Arbuthnot  of  Banff;  fourth,  Alexander,  who  died  without  issue  ;  fifth, 
James ;  sixth,  William  Arbuthnot  (rf) ;  as  also  a  daughter,  Katharine,  married  to 
John  Allardice,  at  that  time  son  and  heir  apparent  to  Thomas  Allardice  of  that 
Ilk  (e).  This  Robert  survived  his  father  but  four  years,  for  I  find  he  died  in  the 
year  1450  (/),  and  was  succeeded  by  his  eldest  son, 

XI.  David  Arbuthnot  of  that  Ilk,  who  was  a  person  of  great  account  in  the 
reign  of  King  James  II.  and  bore  a  considerable  share  in  the   transactions  of  those 

times.     He  married Durham,   daughter  to Durham  of 

Grange  (j^),  a  very  ancient  family  in  the  shire  of  Forfar.  By  her  he  had  two 
sons,  first,  Robert  his  successor  ;  second,  Hugh  Arbuthnot,  Doctor  of  Medicine, 
who,  being  a  person  of  very  great  skiU  in  his  professon,  was  invited  over  to  France, 
where  he  married  and  settled,  and  where  probably  his  posterity  still  continues  (/j). 

As  also  three  daughters,  first,  Elizabeth,   married  to  Barclay  of  Gartly, 

an  ancient  family  in  Vlcec.omitatu  de  Aberdeen;  second,  Giles,  married  to 

Fraser  of  Dores ;  third.  Christian,  to  Alexander  Graham,  tutor  of  Morphie  (/). 
He  departed  this  mortal  life  in  the  year  1470  (^),  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son, 

XII.  Sir  Robert  Arbuthnot  of  that  Ilk,  who  being  a  person  of  very  great 
loyalty  and  integrity,  was  highly  in  favour  with  his  contemporary  sovereigns  King 
James  III.  and  IV.  as  evidently  appears  by  several  letters  written  to  him,  by  both 
these  monarchs,  some  of  which  are  still  preserved  aniong  the  archives  of  the  fami- 
ly :  particularly  one  from  King  James  III.  dated  at  Edinburgh,  January  3.  the 
23d  year  of  his  reign,  which  begins  thus,  "■  Weilbelovit  frende  we  grete  zow  wele;, 
"  and  forsamekle  as  we  ar  sikkerly  informit  yt  certan  persons,  to  grete  nowmer, 
"  wer  gadderit  tresonably  to  haf  iiwadit  our  person  yis  last  Thurisday,  &.c."  And 
a  little  after,  the  king  desires  him  to  come  to  his  assistance,  "  As  ze  lufe  ye  welfar 
"  of  owr  persone,  succession,  realme,  and  liegis,  and  ze  sal  have  special  thank  and 
"  rewarde  of  ws  according  to  zour  merit,  &-c.  (/)."  There  is  also  extant  another 
letter,  directed  to  him  by  King  James  IV.  the  beginning  of  which  is  thus,  "  James^. 
"  be  the  grace  of  God,  King  of  Scottis,  to  owr  lovit  Robert  of  Arbuthnott  of  that 
"  Ilk,  greting ;  forsamekle  as  we  suppos  ze  knaw  the  grete  tressoun  and  usurpa- 
"  tioun  made  agains  ws  and  owre  autorite,  be  Wilzame  Erie  Marchall,  Alexander 
"  Master  of  Huntle,  and  Alexander  Lord  Forbess,  &.  thair  compHces,  in  the  mak- 
"  ing  of  certane  ligs  and  bands  at  owr  Castell  of  Dumbertane,  Sf-c."  And  a  little 
below,  the  king  injoins  him,  "  surely  and  sikkerly  ger  obserue  and  kepe  zour  howsys 
"  and  strenthis  to  zour  behuf  and  owrs,  and  ze  sal  report  singler  thank  and  rewarde 
"  of  ws  yerfore,  and  be  mantenyt  be  ws  as  owr  thankfull  and  trew  liege,  Stc." 
This  is  dated  at  "  Strivelin  the  22.  day  of  September,  and  of  owr  regne  the  secund 
"  zeir."  (ot)  He  was  also  a  very  prudent  and  frugal  man,  and  added,  by  his  indus- 
try and  good  management,  a  great  many  lands  to  his  old  paternal  inheritance,  as 
appears  by  a  charter  under,  the  Great  Seal  in  his  favours  (n),  "  De  terris  de  Portar- 

(0  Orig.  &  Increment.  FarniliaB  Arbuthnotlcse,  MS.  (a)  Skeen's  Memorial  of  the  Royal  Burgh^ 
page  249.  (v)  OrifT.  &  Increment,  (a)  Charta  in  publicis  Archivis.  (AJ  Orig.  &  Increment.  Kami- 
liae  Arbathnoticae,  iVIS.  (c)  Ibidem.  (i/)  Ibidem.  (c)  Charta  penes  Vicecomitem  de  Arbuthnott 
ad  annum  1459.  (/)  Orig.  &  Increment.  MS.  {g)  Ibidem,  where  it  is  also  said  that  she  lived  a  m- 
dow  18  years  after  her  husband's  decease,  until  the  \  car  1488.  (A)  Ibidem.  (/)  Ibidem.  (,f)  Ibi- 
dem. (/)  Original  Lnter  by  King  JamesIII.  directed,'"  Dilecto  &  fideli  suo  Domino  de  Arbuthnott  circa 
annum  148^,  pene' Vicecomitem  de  Arbuthnot."  {rri)  Original  letter  to  the  Laird  of  Arbuthnot  in  the  year 
1 490,  by  King  James  IV.  penes  Vicecomitem  de  Arbuthnot.   (n)  Charta  11 7.  lib.  5.  in  publicis  Archivis. 


34  APPENDIX. 

"  toun,  Orchartoun,  &  Halgreen,  &-c.  datum  apud  Edinb.  penultimo  die  Februarit, 
"  A.  D.  1487,"  as  also  by  another  charter  granted  in  his  favour  by  King  James 
IV.  (0)  of  the  lands  of  Arduthoquhy,  Achinzoch,  Grenecastle,  Portarhakh,  Por- 
tarcroft,  &c.  dated  at  Edinburgh,  October  20.  1488.  He  recovered  also  again  the 
barony  of  Fiddes  (p),  which  had  been  alienate  from  his  family  upwards  of  200 
years.  Neither  seems  he,  amidst  his  temporal  concerns,  to  have  neglected  his  spi- 
ritual welfare ;  for  the  year  before  he  died  he  founded  a  chaplainry  at  the  church 
of  Arbuthnot,  "  Pro  salute  animae  mese,  at  Mariotse  Scrimgeour  sponsae  meae,  nee 
"  non  animarum  patris  mei  et  matris  meae,  &-c.  uni  capellano  divina  celebranti,  et 
"  in  perpetuum  celebraturo,  ad  altare  gloriosas  Virginis  Marina,  juxta  latus  chori  pa- 
"  rochialis  Sancti  Ternani  Archipraesulis  de  Arbuthnott,  Sancti  Andreae  diocesis,  an- 
"  nuum  redditum  quatuordecim  mercarum  sex  solidorum  et  octo  denariorum  usuahs 
"  monetae  regni  Scotia;,  de  omnibus  et  singulis  terris  de  Halgreen,  Innerbervy,  Por- 
"  tartoun,  et  Orchartoun,  et  croftis  de  Auchcarny,  una  cum  mansione,horto  et  crofto 
"  terrae  situatae  prope  capellam  Sancti  Ternani,  pro  residencia  et  habitatione  dicti 

"  capellani  et  successorum  suorum  pro  perpetuo  in  futurum,  &c. Apud  Arbuth- 

"  nott,  30.  die  Mail,  A.  D.  1505,  coram  his  testibus,  Willielmo  Frazer  de  Durris, 
"  Roberto  Alerdas,  Willielmo  Arbuthnott,  &.c."  This  mortification  is  confirmed 
by  King  James  IV.  August  9.  the  same  year  (g).  He  married,  first, Wish- 
art,  daughter  to  Sir  James  Wishart  of  Pitarrow,  an  ancient  family  in  the  Merns, 
by  whom  he  had  only  one  son,  Ambrose  (r),  who  died  in  the  flower  of  his  youth. 
He  married,  secondly  (j-),  Mariota  Scrymgeour,  daughter  to  Sir  James  Scrymgeour 
of  Dudhope,  ancestor  to  the  Earl  of  Dundee,  by  whom  he  had  four  sons,  first,  James, 
his  successor  ;  second,  Mr  Robert  Arbuthnot ;  third,  George  Arbuthnot,  Esquire, 
who  died  in  France  without  issue;  fourth,  Andrew  Arbuthnot  of  Futhes  (t),  who, 
by  Elizabeth  his  wife,  daughter  to  Alexander  Strachan  of  Thornton,  had  issue, 
Robert  his  successor,  and  the  learned  Mr  Alexander  Arbuthnot,  Principal  of  the 
King's  College  at  Aberdeen,  author  of  the  so  frequently  cited  History  of  the  fa- 
mily of  Arbuthnot,  of  whom  our  Reverend  Church  Historian  Archbishop  Spotis- 
wood  gives  the  following  character  (//),  "  That  he  was  expert  in  all  the  sciences,  a 
"  good  poet,  mathematician,  philosopher,  theologue,  lawyer,  and  skilful  in  medi- 
"  cine ;  so  that  in  every  subject  he  could  promptly  discourse,  and  to  good  purpose." 
Robert  Arbuthnot  of  that  Ilk,  had  also,  by  the  above  lady,  six  daughters  ;  first, 
Elizabeth,  married  to  Thomas  Fotheringham  of  Powrie;  second,  Katharine  married 

iirst  to Auchinleck  of  that  Ilk,  and  after  his  decease  to   Gilbert   Turing 

of  Foveran  ;  third.  Christian,  married  to  Alexander  Eraser  of  Dx)res  ;  fourth, 
Giles,  married  to  Robert  Graham  of  Morphie  (.v)  ;  fifth,  Janet,  married  to  Alexan- 
der Falconer  of  Halkerton,  ancestor  to  the  Lord  Halkerton;  sixth,  Mariota,  to  James 
Bisset  of  Easter-K.inneff  (j).  He  died  in  the  year  1506,  and  was  succeeded  by  his 
son, 

XIII.  James  Arbuthnot  of  that  Ilk,  who  got  a  charter  from  King  James  IV. 
dated  at  Edinburgh.  January  29.  a?ino  1506,  de  baronia,  castro,  et  fortalitio  de 
Arbuthnott,  ISc.  {a).  He  married  Jean  Stewart,  daughter  to  John  Earl  of  Athol  (b), 
by  Mary  his  wife,  daughter  to  Colin  Earl  of  Argyle,  by  whom  he  had  two  sons 
and  one  daughter.  First,  Robert  his  successor;  second,  David  Arbuthnot  (r), 
who,  being  a  young  brother,  devoted  himself  to  the  service  of  the  church,  and 
having  taken  on  holy  orders,  he  was  made  parson  of  Menmuir.  He  was  after- 
wards unfortunately  slain  at  the  fatal  battle  of  Pinky,  September  10.  1547  {d). 
His  daughter's  name  was  Isabel,  who  married  first  Auchterlony  of  Kel- 
ly, and  afterwards  Robert  Maule  of  Panmure,  ancestor  to  the  Earl  ot  Panmure  (f), 

(0)  Charta  15.  lib.  12.  Arch.  pub.  (/>)  Orig.  &  Increment.  Famillfe  Arbuthnot,  MS.  (y)  Charta  iio. 
lib.  1 4.  in  publicis  Archivis  ad  annum  1  505.  (r)  Orig.  &  Increment.  &c.  (j-)  Charta  in  publicis  Archivis, 
(/)  Charta  334.  lib.  21.  in  publicis  Archivis  facta  Andrese  Arbuthnott  in  Pitcarles,  &  Roberto  Arbuth- 
nott, ejus  filio  &  hferedi  apparenti,  de  omnibus  &  singulis  terris,  &  villa  de  Littil  Futhes,  cum  suis  pcrtinen- 
tiis  jacent.  in  baronia  de  Stratoun,  infra  parochiam  de  Kinneff,  apud  Edinburgh,  Maii  8.  1556.  («)  Spotis- 
wood's  Church  History,  lib.  6.  page  335..  (x)  Orig.  &  Increment.  (_)-)  Ibidem.  (a)  Charta  294. 
lib.  14.  in  publicis  Archivis.  (i)  Continuation  of  the  History  of  the  Family  of  Arbuthnot,  MS. 
(c)  Charta  2^9.  lib.  22.  in  publicis  Archivis,  ad  annum  1542.  (J)  Continuation  of  Principal  Arbuth- 
not's  History",  MS.  (f)  Charta  penes  Comitem  de  Panmure,  etiam  Charta  604.  lib.  13.  in  publicis  Ar- 
chivis facta  per  Thomam  Maul,  feodatorium  baronia  de  Panmure,  cum  consensu  &  assensu  charissimi  pa- 
tris sui  Robert!  Maule  de  Panmure,  honorabili  mulieri  Isabella  Arbuthnott  prsefati  patris  sui  sponss,  dc 
terris  de  Glaster  &  Skryne,  anno  1551. 


APPENDIX.  85. 

anil  had  issue.  This  James  Arbuthnot  of  that  Ilk  died  in  the  flower  of  liis  age 
in  the  year  1521  (,A)i  ^nd  was  succeeded  by  his  son, 

XIV.  Robert  Arbuthnot  of  that  Ilk,  the  third  of  that  name,  who  was  a  per- 
son of  great  note  in  the  reign  of  King  James  V.  from  whom  he  obtained  a  char- 
ter, dated  at  Edinburgh,  January  27.  anno  1528  {g),  whereby  the  king  gives  him, 
"  totam  et  integram  nostram  salmonum  piscariam  super  le  seashore,  subtus  villam 
"  de  Innerbervy,  inter  le  mouth  aqurc  de  Innerbervy  et  locum  de  Halgreen,  &.c." 

He  married,  first, Erskine,  daughter  to  Erskine  of  Dun  {b), 

an  ancient  family  in  Vicccomitatu  de  Forfar,  by  whom  he  had  no  surviving,  issue. 
After  her  decease  he  maiTied  Lady  Christian  Keith  (/),  daughter  to  Robert  Lord 
Keith,  (son  and  heir  apparent  to  William  Earl  Marischal)  by  Beatrix  his  wife, 
daughter  to  John  Earl  of  Morton  (^k)  ;  as  evidently  appears  by  a  charter  under 
the  Great  Seal,  in  the  Public  Records,  granted  by  King  James  V.  "  Dilectis  nos- 
"  tris  Roberto  Arbuthnott  de  eodem,  et  Christiana;  Keith  sua;  sponsae,  de  terris  de 
"  Petquorthy  et  Caldcoats,  &-c."  dated  at  Strivelin,  February  13th  1535  (/).  By 
this  lady  lie  had  four  sons  ;  first,  Andrew,  his  successor  ;  second,  John  Arbuthnot 
of  Mandynes  ;  third,  Alexander  Arbuthnot  of  Pitcarles  (;/;)  ;  fourth,  Robert  Ar- 
buthnot, who,  being  a  younger  brother,  dedicated  himself  to  the  service  of  the 
church,  and,  after  spending  some  years  in  France,  with  great  application  to  his  stu- 
dies, was,  by  his  father,  upon  his  ret^urn,  presented  to  the  parsonage  of  Arbuthnot, 
which  he  enjoyed  until  his  death  (/z):  as  also  several  daughters;  first, mar- 
ried to Clephane  of  Carslogie,  iti  Vicecomitatii  de  Fife ;.  second,. to 

Straiten  of  Lauriston,  in  Plcecoviitatu  de Kineardin;  third, to Sym- 

mer  of  Balyordie,  an  ancient  family  in  the  shire  of  Forfar;  fourth, to 

Strachan  of  Brigton  (0).  Robert  Arbuthnot  of  that  Ilk  married  to  his  third  wife 
Helen  Clephane,  daughter  to  George  Clephane  of  Carslogie,  a  very  ancient  family  in 
the  shire  of  Fife  (/»),  by  whom  he  had,  first,  David  Arbuthnot  of  Findowry ;  second, 
James  Arbuthnot  of  Blackstone;  third,  Hugh  Arbuthnot  of  Auchterforfar  (y) ;  as  al- 
so several  daughters  ;  first,  married  to Mortimer  of  Cragievar,  in 

I'icecomitatu  de  Aberdeen ;  second, married  to Ogilvie  of  Balfour,  in 

Jlcecomitatu  de  Forfar  (;) ;  third, married  to Ramsay  of  Barnyard's; 

fourth, to Ogih'ie  of  Balnabeth   (r).     He  himself  died  October 

15th  anno  1579  (/),  and  was  interred  amongst  his  ancestors  in  the  burial-place  of 
the  family  at  Arbuthnot,  being  succeeded  in  his  estate  by  his  son, 

XV.  Andrxw  Arbuthnot  of  that  Ilk,  w  ho,  being  a  very  frugal  and  industrious 
gentleman,  considerably  augmented  his  old  paternal  inheritance,  by  several  new 
acquisitions;  such  as  the  baronies  of  Arrat,  Pitforthie,  &c.  (u).  There  is  a  charter 
in  the  public  records,  granted  by  Q^ieen  Mary,  "  Dilecto  et  fideli  suo  Andrea 
"  Arbuthnott,  filio  et  haei-edi  apparent!  Roberti  Arbuthnott  de  eodem,  de  baronia 
"  de  Arbuthnott,  cum  le  mains,  castro,  et  fortalitio  de  Arbuthnott,  &c.  una  cum-. 
"  piscaria  in  aqua  de  Bervy,  et  piscariis  in  faucibus  aqu?e  de  Innerbervy  infra 
"  maris  fluxum,"  &c.  (.v)  He  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  to  Sir  Robert  Car- 
negie of  Kinnaird,  who  was  ambassador  from  the  crown  of  Scotland,  to  the  court . 
of  England  and  France,  and  ancestor  to  the  Earl  of  Southesfc,  as  appears  by  a 
charter  {a)  in  the  public  records,  granted  by  Queen  Mary,  "■  Andreje  Arbuthnott 
"  feodatario  de  eodem,  et  Elisabetha;  Carnegy  ejus  conjugi,  de  terris  de  Fidde^, 
"  Collistoun,  Mutelaw,  &-c.  datum  September  24.  anno  1553."  By  the  above  lady 
he  had  three  sons ;  first.  Sir  Robert  Arbuthnot  of  that  Ilk,   his  sucessor;  second, 

James   Arbuthnot  of  Arrat    (Z>),    who    married  Livingston,    daughter 

to Livingston  of  Dunipace,  an  ancient  family  in  Vicecomitatu  de  Strive- 

(/)  Continuation  of  the  History  of  the  family  of  Arbuthnot,  IVTS.  {_g)  Charta  202.  lib.  i8.  in 
publicis  Archivis.  (A)  Continuation  of  Principal  Arbuthnot's  History,  &c.  (i)  Charta  in  publicis  Ar- 
chtvis,  ad  annum  15,^;.  (f)  Ibidem  ad  an-ium  1506.  (/)  Charta  257.  lib.  27.  in  publicis  Archivis. 
(m)  Continuation  of  Principal  Arbuthnot's  History,  &c.  («)  Ibidem.  (0)  Ibidem.  (/>)  Charta  4.  lib. 
32.  in  publicis  Archivis,  de  terris  de  Auchtirforfar,  facta  dilecto  nostro  Roberto  Arbuthnot  de  eodem,  et 
haeredibus  suis  masculis  inter  eum  et  Helenam  Clepan  sponsam  suam  legitime  procreatis  seu  procreandis,. 
quibus  deficientibus  Roberto  Arbuthnot,  filio  dicti  Roberti, Arbuthnot  de  eodem,  &.c.  datum  apud  Edinb. 
7.  Septembrls,  A.  I>.  1573.  (?)  Charta  in  publicis  Archivis.  (r)  Continuation  of  Principal  Arbuth- 
not's History,  (j-)  liiidem.  (;)  Ibidem.  (;/)  Tliis  appears  from  several  charters  in  the  public  records, 
(x)  Charta  106.  lib.  21.  in  publicis  Archivis,  data  apud  Perth,  26  die  mensis  Junii  anno  1553.  (a)  Char- 
ta  174.  lib.  ;i,  in  publicis  Archivis.     (A)  Ciiartu  in  publicis  Archivis. 

Vol.  II.  ^  F 


86  APPENDIX. 

tin,  by  whom  he  had  Sir  Robert  Arbuthnot  of  Arrat,  who  succeeded  to  the  estate 
of  Arbuthnot  upon  his  uncle's  decease,  and  James,  tutor  of  Arbuthnot;  third, 
Patrick  Arbuthnot  of  Chapelton  (c):  As  alio  a  daughter,  Elizabeth,  married  to 

Eraser  of  Dores  (d).     He  died  in  a  good  advanced  age,  March  6.  1606, 

and  was  succeeded  by  his  son, 

XVI.  Sir  Robert  Arbuthnot  of  that  Ilk,  who,  being  a  person  of  great  talents, 
both  natural  and  acquired,  was  highly  in  favour  with  his  sovereign  King  James  VI. 
who  had  aways  a  very  great  opinion  of  Sir  Robert's  parts  and  integrity,  as  will 
evidently  appear  by  the  following  letter,  which  is  here  subjoined,  as  I  copied  it 
verbatim  fiom  the  original  (f),  directed  thus,  "  To  our  trusty  and  well-beloved  the 
"  Laird  of  Arbuthnott."     The  tenor  of  it  follows  : 

James  R. 

"  Trusty  and  weill-beloved  we  greit  you  weiU.  Whereas  we  have  licensed  the 
"  General  Assembly  of  the  Church  of  that  Kingdome,  to  be  kept  the  last  Tuesday 
"  of  July  nixt,  at  our  burgh  of  Linlithgow,  as  weill  for  composing  of  the  present 
"  differences  in  the  same,  as  for  some  order  to  be  taken  with  this  greit  incress  and 
"  growth  of  papists  within  that  kingdome:  To  the  effect  therefore  that  all  things 
"  maye  be  dewly  ordered,  and  in  decent  form  proceidit  into :  And  knowing  that 
"  your  presence  there  maye  doe  much  good,  we  are  to  desyre  you  earnestly  nowaye 
"  to  be  absent  from  that  assembly ;  and  by  your  councel  and  advice,  to  furder 
^'  the  pacifying  of  all  question  that  is  presently  in  the  church,  and  to  assist  such 
"  courses,  that  sail  be  proponed  for  suppressing  of  contraire  professors.  Wherein 
"  nowaye  doubting,  bot  your  oune  zeale  and  affection  to  the  treuth  professed  sail 
"  be  motives  sufficient,  and  ye  sail  also  therewith  gayne  our  special  thanks,  ac- 
"  cording  as  ye  will  learne  more  particularly  from  our  right  trustie  cousing  and 
"  councellor  the  Erie  of  Dunbar,  whom  we  have  sent  with  special  creditt,  as  our 
"  commissioner  to  that  meiting.  And  so  we  bid  you  farewel.  From  our  Courte 
"  at  Greenwich  the  14.  of  Junii  1608." 

He  married  Lady  Mary  Keith  (/),  daughter  to  William  Lord  Keith,  (son  and 
heir  apparent  to  William  Earl  MarischaL)  by  Elizabeth  his  wife,  daughter  to 
George  Earl  of  Errol  (^),  by  whom  he  had  no  issue;  so  that  upon  his  decease, 
which  happened  in  the  year  ^615,  the  estate  of  Arbuthnot  devolved  upon  his  ne- 
phew, 

XVII.  Sir  Robert  Arbuthnot  of  that  Ilk  (A),  eldest  son  to  his  brother  James 
Arbuthnot  of  Arrat,  as  is  above  mentioned.  He  being  heir  apparent  to  an  old 
family  of  an  opulent  fortune,  was  carefully  educated  by  his  uncle  suitable  to  his 
quality;  for,  after  having  gone  through  the  course  of  his  studies  in  his  native 
country,  he  was  sent,  for  his  further  improvement,  to  visit  France  and  other  fo- 
reign limgdoms,  from  whence,  after  some  years  abode,  he  returned  with  the  cha- 
racter of  a  very  polite  and  well  accomplished  gentleman,  and  made  a  very  con- 
siderable figure  amongst  the  barons  in  several  of  King  James  VI.  and  King 
Charles  I.'s  Parliaments ;  with  both  which  monarchs  he  was  so  much  in  favour,  that 
it  is  very  probable  he  would  have  raised  his  family  considerably,  had  not  an  im- 
mature death  untimeously  snatched  him  away  in  the  flower  of  his  age,  to  the 
great  regret  of  all  his  friends  and  acquaintances.  He  was  twice  married;  first,  to 
Lady  Margaret  Keith  (/),  daughter  to  George  Earl  Marischal,   and  niece  to  his 

(c)  Charta  190.  lib.  40.  Arch.  pub.  facta  praedllecto  nostra  Andrese  Arbutlinot  de  eodem  in  vjtali 
redditu,  ac  Patricio  Arbuthnott  suo  filio  juniori,  &c.  quibus  deficientibus  Jacobo  Arbuthnott  de  Aratt, 
&c.  de  totis&  integris  villa  &  terrisde  Magdalen-Chapel,  nuncupat.  le  Chapiltoun,  apud  Halyrudehouse, 
2j  die  Februarii,  A.  D.  1594.  etiam  Charta  24.  lib.  42.  facta  Andreae  Arbuthnott  de  eodem,  &  Pa- 
tricio Arbuthnott  suo  filio  legitimo  natu  minimo,  de  terris  de  Nether- Pitforthies,  apud  Halyrudehouse, 
20.  die  M.irtii  anno  1 597.  {d)  Continuation  of  Arbuthnot's  History,  {e)  Original  Letter  in  anno 
l6o8,  by  King  James  VI.  to  the  Laird  of  Arbuthnot,  penes  Vicecomitem  de  Arbuthnott.  (/)  Charta 
193.  lib.  47.  in  publicis  Archivis,  facta  dilecto  nostro  Domino  Roberto  Arbuthnott  de  eodem,  militi,  & 
DominEB  Mariae  Kleth  ejus  sponsa;,  de  terris  de  Cowlie,  &c.  apud  Edinb.  7.  die  mensis  Januarii  anno 
"^("^i-  ig)  Charta  in  publicis  Archivis,  ad  annum  1553.  (A)  Charta  54.  lib.  48.  Arch.  pub.  facta 
Roberto  Arbuthnott  de  Arrat  militi,  de  baronia,  castro,  &  fortalitio  de  Arbuthnott,  apud  Edinb.  9.  die 
Januarii,  A,  D.  1610.  (0  Charta  in  publicis  Archivis. 
I 


APPENDIX.  S7 

tiade's  lady.  But  she  dying  very  soon  after,  without  issue,  he  married,  secondly, 
Margaret  Fraser,  daughter  to  Simon  Lord  Lovat,  by  Jean  Stewart  his  wife,  daugh- 
ter to  James  Lord  Doune,  by  whom  he  had  four  sons;  first,  Su"  Robert  Arbuthuot 
of  that  Ilk,  his  successor,  afterwards  Viscount  of  Arbuthnot ;  second,  Andrew  Ar- 
buthnot  of  Fiddes ;  third,  Alexander  Arbuthnot,  a  young  gentleman  of  great 
loyalty  and  courage,  who  was  slain  valiantly  fighting  in  defence  of  his  king  and 
country  at  the  fatal  battle  of  Dunbar,  September  3.  1650;  fourth,  Simon  Arbuth- 
not of  Catherlan:  As  also  three  daughters;  first,  Jean,  married  to  Sir  Alexander 
Burnet  of  Leys ;  second,  Margaret,  to  Sir  Alexander  Carnegie  of  Pittarrow  ;  third,  • 
Janet,  to  William  Rait  of  Halgreen.  He  died  March  1^.  anno  1633  {k),  and  was 
succeeded  by  his  eldest  son, 

■  XViU.  Sir  Robert  Ak.buihnot  of  that  Ilk,  who  being  a  person  of  exemplary 
loyalty,  obtained  fust  the  honour  of  knighthood .(/)  from  his  sovereign  King 
Charles  I.  and  was  afterwards,  by  the  special  favour  of  that  monarch,  advanced  to 
the  peerage  of  this  realm,  by  the  title  of  Viscount  of  Arbuthnot,  and  Lord  Inver- 
bervie, by  letters  patent,  bearing  date  November  16.  1641  (ni).  He  married,  first,. 
Lady  Marjory  Carnegie,  daughter  to  David  Earl  of  Southesk,  by  whom  he  had 
Robert,  his  successor,  and  a  daughter,  Margaret,  married  to  Sir  John  Forbes  of 
Monymusk  in  Vicecomitatu  de  Aberdeen ;  and,  after  her  decease,  he  married  Ka- 
tharine, daughter  to  Hugh  Lord  Lovat,  by  whom  he  had  Alexander  Arbuthnot  of 
Knox,  and  a  daughter,  Anne,  married  to  William  Forbes  of  Ludquhairn  in  Pice- 
comitatu  de  Aberdeen;  tuid  dying  in  the  year  1659  («),  he  was  succeeded  by  hir 
son, 

XIX.  Robert  Lord  Viscount  of  Areuthnot,  who  married  first  Lady  Elizabeth 
Keith,  daughter  to  William  Earl  Marischal,  by  Lady  EHzabeth  Seaton,  his  wife^ 
daughter  to  George  Earl  of  Winton,  by  whom  he  had  Robert,  who  succeeded  him 
in  his  estate  and  honours,  and  a  daughter,  Margaret,  married  to  Sir  Thomas  Bur- 
net of  Leys.  He  married,  secondly,  Katharine,  daughter  to  Robert  Gordon  of 
Pitlurg  and  Straloch,  by  whom  he  had,  first,  Mr  John  Arbuthnot  of  Fordun;  se- 
cond, Mr  Alexander  Arbuthnot,  one  of  the  Barons  of  his  Majesty's  Exchequer  in 
Scotland,  who  afterwards  changed  his  surname  to  Maitland,  upon  the  account  of 
his  marriage  with  Jean,  eldest  daughter  and  sole  heiress  to  Sir  Charles  Maitland  of 
Pitrichie;  third,  Mr  Thomas  Arbuthnot:  As  also  three  daughters ;  first,  Katharine, 
married  first  to  Mr  Robert  Gordon  of  Clunie,  and  again  to  David  Riccart  of  Ric- 
carton;  second,  Anne,  married  to  Mr  John  Horn  of  Westerhall,  advocate;  third,. 
Helen,  married  first  to  John  Macfarlane  of  that  Ilk,  and  afterwards  to  Mr  John 
Spottiswood  of  that  Ilk,  advocate;  and  all  of  them  had  issue.  This  lord  died  ia. 
the  year  1684,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son, 

XX.  Robert  Viscount  of  Arbuthnot,  who  married  Lady  Anne  Sutherland, 
only  daughter  to  George  Earl  of  Sutherland,  by  Lady  Jean  his  wife,  daughter  to 
David  Earl  of  Wemyss,  by  whom  he  had  Robert,  his  successor,  and  John,  the 
present  Viscount ;  as  also  four  daughters,  Jean,  Anne,  Mary,  and  Margaret;  and 
dying  in  the  y?ar  1692,  he  was  succeeded  by  Iiis  eldest  son  Robert  Viscount  of 
Arbuthnot,  a  nobleman  pf  great  parts  and  expectation,  who,  to  the  great  grief 
of  all  his  relations,  was  untimeously  snatched  away  by  death,  in  the  year  1710, 
unmarried.  Upon  whose  decease  both  the  estate  and  honours  went  to  his  bro- 
ther, 

XXI.  John,  present  Lord  Viscount  of  Arbuthnot,  who  married  Jean,  daughter, 
to  William  Morison  of  Prestongrange. 


Of  the  surname  of  PETRIE. 


SEVERALS  of  those  of  the  surname  of  Petrie  in  Scotland  do  bear  the  same 
arms  with  those  of  Ireland,  from  whom  they  seem  to  have  been  descended,  parti- 

(/f)  Continuation  of  Principal  Arbuthnot's  History,  MS.     (/)  Cliarta  in  publicis  Archivis     (m)  Re- 
gister  of  Patents  in  the  Chancery  Office,     (n)  Frasei's  History  of  the  Family  of  Lovat,  MS. 


88  APPENDIX. 

cularly  in  Vicecom.  Moravien.  And  thus  Major  Ludovick.  Petrie,  some  time 
Town-Major  of  Gibraltar,  bears  gules,  a  bend  or,  between  two  escalops  argent, 
within  a  bordure  ingrailed;  crest,  a  cross  cxoii&l  fitch e:  motto,  Fides. 


CRAWFURDS  of  Auchinames. 


THAT  the  Crawfcrds  were  barons  of  the  extensive  barony  of  Loudon,  ancT 
Heritable  Sheriffs  of  Ayr,  ever  since  the  days  of  King  Alexander  II.  is  evident 
from  the  chartulary  of  Kelso  in  the  Lawyers'  Library ;  and  that  the  ancient  fa- 
mily of  Auchinames  in  Renfrewshire  were  lineally  descended  of  Sir  Ranald  Craw- 
furd  of  Loudon,  sheriff  of  Ayr,  will  be  evident  beyond  exception  from  what  I  am 
to  offer.  This  family  were,  from  their  very  first  descent  from  the  family  of  Loudon, 
possessed  of  the  twelve  pound  land,  of  old  extent,  of  Auchinames  in  Renfrewshire, 
and  the  fourteen  pound  lands  of  Corsby,  the  six  pound  lands  of  Manock  and  Gills, 
the  five  merk  lands  of  Auldmuir,  and  the  five  merk  lands  of  Whiteside,  all  in  the 
shire  of  Ayr,  being  thirty-eight  pounds  and  one  merk  of  old  extent;  all  which 
knds  were  in  the  possession  of  Thomas  Crawfurd  of  Auchinames,  grandchild  of  Sir 
Ranald  Crawfurd  of  Loudon. 

This  Thomas  lived  in  the  days  of  King  Robert  III.  and  is  witness  to  the  resig- 
nation of  the  lands  of  Fulton,  to  the  monks  of  Paisley,  in  the  year  1409.  As  this 
gentleman  was  possessed  of  a  very  fair  estate,  so  he  was  zealous  to  bestow  a  part  of 
it  upon  these  uses  which  were  then  judged  to  contribute  most  to  the  promoting  of 
piety,  and  procuring  salvation  both  to  his  own  soul  and  the  souls  of  his  near  rela- 
tions; as  appears  from  the  original  charter,  yet  extant,  in  the  custody  of  the  family 
of  Auchinames,  whereof  this  is  an  exact  copy. 

"  Universis  Christi  fidelibus,  ad  quorum  notitiam  presentes  literEE  pervenerint, 
"  Thomas  de  Crawfurd  dominus  de  Auchinamys,  salutem  in  Domino  sempiter- 
"  nam.  Noveritis  me  pro  salute  animae  mese,  et  animarum  uxorum  mearum,  et 
"  animse  Reginald!  de  Crawfurd  avi  mei,  nee  non  pro  salute  animarum  patrum 
','  et  matrum  nostrorum,  predecessorum,  hteredum  et  successorum  nostrorum,  et 
**  animarum  omnium  fidelium  defunctorum,  dedisse,  concessisse,  et  hac  present! 
"  charts  mea  confirmasse,  in  puram  et  perpetuam  elimosinam,  Deo  et  sanctissima- 
"  matri  suse  Marite,  semper  Virgini,  et  omnibus  Sanctis,  totam  terram  meam  de 
"  Lyimernocht,  et  duas  mercatas  terras  de  Glentayne,  cum  omnibus  suis  pertinen- 
"  tiis,  et  asiamentis  quibuscunque,  et  tres  mercatas  annui  redditas  quolibet  anno 
«  percipiendas,  per  equales  portiones,  ad  terminos  debitos  et  consuetos,  de  terris 
«  meis  de  Cakachant  de  Corbar,  et  de  totis  terris  de  Auchinamys,  ad  sustenta- 
"  tionem  unius  capellani,  qui  pro  tempore  fuerit  divina  celebrantis,  et  pro  perpetuo 
"  celebraturi  ad  altare  S.inct;e  Mariae  Virginis,  in  ecclesia.  parochial!  de  Kilbarchan, 
«  vel  in  capella  in  ejusdem  ecclesise  cemiterio  construenda  ;  tenendas  et  habendas- 
"  dicto-  capellano  qui  pro  tempore  fuerit,  et  successoribus  suis,  in  puram  et  per- 
•«  petuam  elimosinam,  adeo  hbere,  pacifice,  quiete,  honorifice,  sicut  aliqua  terra 
"  elimosinaria  in  regno  Scotia  conceditur  vel  concedi  potest.  Volo  etiam  et  sta- 
"  tuo  quod  capellanus  dictas  cappellanias,  vel  capella;  niinistrans  vel  ministraturus, 
«  qui  pro  tempore  fuerit,  etedem  capellae,  vel  capellania'  in  propria  persona  mini- 
«  strat,  et  personaliter  residiat  in  eadem,  et  quid  non  poterit  illam  cum  alio  quon- 
«  dam  beneficio  ecclesiastico  in  simul  retinere,  immo  quod  per  acceptationem  se- 
"  cundi  beneficii,  ipsa  vacare  sentiatur,  ipso  facto,  et  quod  dictus  capellanus,  tan- 
«  quam  sacerdos  parochialis  vel  prodefunctis,  vel  aliter  qualitercunque  nullatenus 
"  celebrare  permittatur;  quid  si  facere  atemptaverit,  hoc  ipso  facto  ab  omni  jure 
"  quid  in  dicla  capella  vel  capellania  habuerit,  sit  privatus,  et  ad  eandem  in  pos- 
«  terum,  nuUo  modo  valeat  presentari,  nee  sibi  per  quendam  de  eadem  provider!. 
"  Item  volo  et  statuo  quod  quoties  hujusmodi  capellanus,  per  me,  haeredes  et  assig- 
««  natos  meos  presentatus  est,  et  per  diocesianum,  vel  sede  vacante  capitulum 
«  Glasguensem,  admissus  et  institutus.  in  hujusmodi  capella  vel  capellania,  cedere 


APPENDIX.  89 

"  vel  decedere  contingat  ad  me,  hsredes  meos,  et  assignatos  meos  ejusdem  presen- 
"  tutio,  et  ad  loci  diocesianum  admissio  et  collatio  pertineat,  vel  sedo  vacante  capi- 
"  tulum  Glasgueiisem;  et  si  ego,  hieredes  inei,  aut  assignati,  ad  dictam  capellani 
"  vel  capellanum,  personam  idoneam,  ut  premissum  est,  infra  quatuor  menses  a 
"  tempore  vacationis,"et  notitiai  presentare  detulerimus,  loci  diocesianus,  vel  sede 
"  vacante  capitulus  Glasguensis,  eandem  negligeiitiam  nostram  supplendo  de  per- 
"  sona  idonea  providebit,  ita  tamen  quod  per  liujusaiodi  provisionem  diocesiani,, 
"  vel  sede  vacante  capituli  Glasguensis  mihi,  hreredibus  meis,  vel  assignatis,  cum 
"  alias  vacaverit,  nullum  omnino  prejudicium  generetur;  et  si  contingat  me,  ha;- 
"  redes  meos,  vel  assignatos  meos,  contra  istam  coarcessionem  meam  et  ordina- 
"  tionem,  in  toto,  aut  in  jiarte  venire,  obligo  me,  hxredes  meos,  et  assignatos 
"  meos,  in  quadraginta  libras  sterlingorum  solvendas  fabrica;  ecclesije  Glasguensis 
"  toties  quoties  esse  continget,  nomine  pena;,  et  nihilominus  per  censuram  ecclesi- 
"  asticam,  ad  haec  omnia  facienda,  a  loci  diocesiano,  et  sede  vacante  capitulo  Glas- 
"  guensi,  compelli,  et  coerceri  valeamus;  et  ut  ista  ordinatio  et  concessio  mea  firma 
"  valeat  in  p^rpetuum  et  inconcussa  ma-nere,  volo  pro  me,  hwredibus  meis,  et 
"  assignatis,  et  consensio  ut  perdecanum  et  eschactorem  Christianitatis  de  Ruglen, 
"  qui  pro  tempore  fuerit,  dicta  capellu  vel  capellania,  singulis  annis  semel  visite- 
"  tur,  vel  sicpius,  si  per  me,  haredes  meos,  vel  assignatos,  cum  instantia  fuerint  re- 
"  quisiti.  In  cujus  rei  testimonium,  huic  presenti  charts,  perpetuaz  meje-  sigillum 
"  meum  est  appensum,  coram  his  testibus,  videlicet,  venerabili  in  Christi  patre 
"  Matheo  miseratione  divina  episcopo  Glasguensi,  Joanne  Symple  de  Elzotston, 
"  Roberto  Symple,  Malcolmo  de  Calbrat  Domino  de  Grenok,  Joanne  de  Crawfurd 
"  fratre  meo,  cum  multis  aliis."' 

This  mortificattion  is  confirmed  by  King  Robert  III.  in  the  twelfth  year  of 
his  reign,  at  Arneall  the  2-4tbof  October  iaoi,  by  a  ratification  under  his  Privy 
Seal. 

To  Thomas  Crawfurd  succeeded  Archibald  his  son,  who  obtained  a  charter 
from  James  1.  upon  the  resignation  ,of  his  father,  in  that  king's  hands,  of  the  third 
part  of  the  lands  of  Auchinames,  and  a  third  part  of  the  mill  thereof  to  the  said 
Archibald,  and  his  heirs-male  ;  which  failing,  to  Friskyn  Crawfurd,  second  son  to 
the  said  Thomas,  and  the  heirs  of  his  body  ;  which  failing,  to  the  said  Thomas 
himself,  and  his  heirs-male  whatsomever,  holding  ward  of  the  prince  and  steward 
of  Scotland.  This  charter  is  4ated  ia  the  list  year  of  King  James  I.  his  reign, 
1427. 

The  next  I  met  with  is  Robert  Crawfurd  of  Auchinames,  who  was  twice  mar- 
ried ;  first,  to  Margaret  Douglas,  daughter  of  George,  Master  of  Angus,  and  sister 
to  Archibald  the  great  Earl  of  Angus,  who  married  King  James  IV.  his  Q^ieen, 
who  was  daughter  to  Heny  VII.  of  England  ;  and  the  said  Robert  had  by  her 
only  one  daughter,  Margaret,  married  to  Semple  of  Nobieston.  He  next  married 
Marion  Houston,  daughter  to  Houston  of  that  Ilk,  by  whom  he  had  three  sons, 
James,  Henry,  and  Robert.  He  grants  a  charter  in  favour  of  his  said  three  sons, 
dated  23d  February  1483,  and  confirmed  by  King  James  III.  2^th  February  1483  : 
and,  in  the  year  1484,  June  18.  the  said  Robert  of  Auchinames  gives  sasine  to 
his  son  James  of  the  whole  lands  of  Auchinames,  with  a  reservation  of  his  own 
liferent.  He  was  killed  with  King  James  IV.  at  the  battle  of  Flodden,  9th  Sep- 
tember 1513. 

To  him  succeeded  James  Crawfurd  of  Auchinames  his  son,  who  obtains  a  char- 
ter from  James  Campbell  of  Loudon  of  the  lands  of  Corsby  and  Munock,  holding 
of  him,  dated  July  12.  1498.  He  resigns  in  the  hands  of  William  Cunningham, 
Master  of  Glencairn,  the  whole  lands  of  Corsby  and  Manock  for  new  infeftment 
of  Thomas  Crawfurd  his  son,  and  his  heirs-male,  the  20th  of  October  1535;  and 
that  same  day  Thomas  Crawfurd  his  son  is  seised  in  the  lands  of  Corsby  and 
Manock.  He  gives  a  charter  to  William  Wallace  of  Craigie  of  the  lands  of  Whit- 
side.  November  4.  1526. 

To  him  succeeded  Thom.«,  his  son  above  mentioned,  who,  in  the  year  1539, 
October  2d,  obtains  a  gift  and  disposition  from  King  James  V.  of  the  non-entries 
of  the  lands  of  Auldmuir;  which  lands  are  said  to  have  continued  in  non-entries 
tor  the  space  of  100  years,  viz.  from  the  death  of  Thomas  Crawfurd  of  Auchi- 
names.    He  married  Marion  Montgomery,  daxighter  to  the  Laird  of  Hazlehead 

Vol.  II.  5  G 


90  APPENDIX. 

and  had  by  her  John,  William,  and  Patrick,  all  Lairds  of  Auchinamcs.  To  Tho- 
mas succeeded  John  Crawfiud  his  son,  who  is  Laird  of  Auchinatnes  in  the  year 
J  544,  as  appears  by  an  instrument  of  apprising  taken  by  Marion  Montgomery, 
lelict  of  Thomas  Crawfurd  of  Auchinames,  the  id  of  December  1544.  He  mar- 
ried Giles  Cunningham,  daughter  to  WiUiam  Cunningham,  second  Laird  of 
Craigends,  but  by  her  he  had  no  succession.  He  was  killed  at  the  battle  of  Pinky 
loth  September  1547. 

To  him  succeeded  William  Crawfurd  of  Auchinames,  his  brother,  who  obliges 
tumself  to  relieve  the  Laird  of  Gadgirth  of  twelve  score  merks,  due  to  the  Laird  of 
Auchinharvie  for  the  lands  of  Corsby  and  Whiteside,  as  appears  by  an  instrument 
dated  May  8.  1558.  He  married  Annabella  Chalmers,  daughter  to  the  Laird  of 
Gadgirth,  and  by  her  had  James.  This  James  succeeded  and  married  Lady  Eliza- 
beth Cunningham,  daughter  to  William  Earl  of  Glencairn.  She  is  seised  in  the 
lands  of  Corsbie,  November  10.  1579.  He  died  in  November  1582,  leaving  only 
one  daughter,  Jean,  of  whom  afterwards. 

To  him  succeeded  Patrick  Crawturd  of  Auldmuir,  his  uncle,  who  is  seised  in 
the  lands  of  Auldmuir  and  Whiteside,  as  heir  to  the  said  James  his  brother-son, 
April  13.  1585;  and  in  April  11.  1586,  he  intents  a  process  of  recognition  a- 
gainst  Malcolm  Crawfurd  of  Kilbirnie,  of  the  lands  of  Manock  and  Gill  in  the  parish 
of  Dairy,  which  the  said  Malcolm  and  his  predecessors  held  ward  of  the  said 
Patrick  and  his  predecessors.  The  process  of  recognition  is  founded  upon  this  rea- 
son ;  because  the  said  Malcolm  had  disponed  more  than  the  half  of  the  said  lands, 
without  the  consent  of  the  said  Patrick  his  superior.  This  controversy  is  by  King 
James  VL  committed  to  the  cognition  of  Mr  John  Skene,  Mr  John  Learmont, 
Mr  William  Oliphant,  Mr  Oliver  Colt,  lawyers,  as  appears  by  the  king's  commis- 
sion to  them,  April   11.  1586.     He  gives  a  sasine  of  the  lands  of  Whiteside  to 

Hugh  Montgomery  of  Hazlehead,  May  24.    1588  ;  he  married 

I'raser,  daughter  to  the  Laird  of  Knox,  and  by  her  had  William,  who,  in  his  fa- 
ther's lifetime,  married  Margaret  Houston,  daughter  to  Sir  Patrick  Houston  of  that 
Ilk.  Their  contract  is  dated  October  10.  1587  J  by  her  he  had  Patrick,  who 
nicceeded  his  grandfather. 

The  above-named  Jean  came  to  be  heiress  of  the  lands  of  Corsbie,  the  estate  of 
\uchinames  having  descended  to  Patrick  of  Auldmuir,  as  heir-rfiale,  uncle  to  James 
Crawfurd  of  Auchinames  last  mentioned,  whose  grandchild,  Patrick  Crawfurd  of 
\uchinames,  married  Jean  Crawfurd,  heiress  of  Corsby,  by  which  the  ancient 
estate  of  Corsby  and  Auchinames  were  re-united. 

This  Patrick,  left  behind  him  six  sons ;  eldest,  William,  v/ho  is  seised  in  the 
twelve  pound  lands  of  Auchinames,  as  heir  to  his  father  Patrick,  May  12.  1649 ; 
lie  married  Anna  Lamont,  daughter  to  Sir  Colin  Lamont  of  Ineryne,  and  Bar- 
bara Semple  his  spouse,  daughter  to  the  Lord  Semple.  Second  son  James,  Writer 
to  the  Signet,  and  father  to  Patrick,  Counsellor  of  Law  at  London.  Third,  Cap- 
tain Robert  of  Nethermains.  Fourth,  John.  Fifth,  Patrick.  Sixth,  Mr  Hugh, 
Minister  of  Cumnock,  and  grandfather  to  Hugh  Crawfurd  of  Garrive.  To  Wil- 
liam succeeded  Archibald  his  only  son,  who  married  Margaret  Porterfield,  daughter 
to  John  Porterfield  of  that  Ilk,  and  had  William  and  three  daughters,  viz.  Anna 
married  to  James  Bruce  of  Poufouls.  Jean  married  to  Patrick  Crawfurd,  merchant 
in  Edmburgh.  Margaret  to  James  Young  of  Killicanty.  William,  in  his  father's 
lifetime,  married  Helen  Burnet,  daughter  to  Sir  Thomas  Burnet,  physician  to  King 
William,  and  had  only  one  daughter,  Helen,  married  to  Patrick  Edmonston  of 
Newton. 

The  estate  of  Auchinames  is  at  present  in  the  possession  of  Patrick  Crawfurd 
above  mentioned,  who  has  a  numerous  male  issue  by  Jean  Crawfurd,  daughter 
to  Archibald  of  Auchinames. 

The  armorial  bearing  of  the  family  of  Auchinames  is  ardent,  two  spears  saltier- 
ways,  betwixt  four  spots  of  ermine :  the  motto  is,  God  shaw  the  ri^bt. 


APPENDIX. 

HOPE  OF  Craighall. 


IN  my  First  Volume,  p.  218,  by  mistake  I  bring  Sir  Thomas  Hope  of  Craig- 
hall's  grandfather  from  Holland,  whereas  it  is  certain  he  came  from  France  in  tlje 
retinue  of  Queen  Magdalen,  King  James  V.  his  first  queen,  and  his  name  was 
John,  said  to  be  descended  of  the  families  des  Houblons  in  Picardy,  (in  Scots)- 
Hops.  He  married  in  France  Bessie  Cuming,  a  Scots  lady.  His  son  Henry  re- 
turned to  France,  and  married  at  Paris  Jean  De  Ton,  who  was  mother  to  this  Sir 
Thomas.  Sir  Thomas,  besides  the  four  son/?  I  formerly  mentioned,  had  two 
daughters,  viz.  Mary  Hope,  married  to  David  Lord  Cardross,  grandfather  to  the 
present  Earl  of  Buchan,  and  Anne  Hope,  married  to  Sir  John  Erskine  of  Alloa, 
His  eldest  son.  Sir  John,  married  Magaret  Murray,  daughter  to  Blackbarony,  and 
had  by  her  Sir  Thomas  of  Graighall,  and  Sir  Archibald  Hope  of  Rankeillor,  one  of 
the  Lords  of  Session  and  Justiciary;  Elizabeth  Hope,  married  to  Sir  George  Mowat 
of  Ingliston  ;  Mary  married  to  Mr  William  Gordon  of  Earkton  ;  Bethia  married  to 
Sir  John  Harper  of  Cambusnethan,  advocate ;  Margaret,  married  to  Sir  Robert 
Pringle  of  Stitchel ;  and  Anne,  married  Haty  Hope  in  Holland,  descended  of  a 
younger  son  of  John  Hope  and  Bessie  Cuming,  naw  a  flourishing  family  there.. 
This  was  the  occasion  of  my  mistake ;  Agnes  the  sixth,  m.arried  to  William  Gault 
a  famous  Turkey  merchant  in  London. 

Sir  Thomas,  son  to  Sir  John,  married  Sir  John  Ayton  of  that  Ilk's  eldest  daugh- 
ter, and  had  one  only  son.  Sir  Thomas,  who  married  Sir  William  Bruce  of  Kin- 
ross's daughter,  and  had  by  her  three  sons.  Sir  William,  Thomas,  and  John  ;  Sir 
William  died  unmarried ;  his  brother  Sir  Thomas  succeeded  him,  and  afterwards 
his  mother  to  the  estate  of  Kinross,  and  carries  now  the  name  of  Bruce-Hope ;  his 
brother,  Colonel  John,  is  present  Governor  of  Bermudas. 


FERGUSSON  of  Craicdarroch.. 


I  HAVE  given  before  in  the  First  Volume  the  arms  of  Fercusson  of  Craigdai- 
locb  out  of  the  Lyon  Register  ;  but  since,  I  am  certainly  informed,  that  the  same 
arms,  as  in  the  Lyon  Register,  together  with  the  arms  of  Katharine  Cunningham, 
daughter  to  the  Earl  of  Glencairn,  are  above  the  door  of  the  old  house  of  Craig- 
darroch. 

The  Fergussons  of  Craigdarroch  seem  to  be  of  very  old  standing  in  the  parish 
of  Glencairn,  and  sheriffdom  of  Dumfries,  and  that,  without  claiming  the  antiqui- 
ties of  other  families,  into  which  they  are  either  thrown  by  accident  or  purchase, 
and  have  been  numerous  in  their  descendants,  several  families  deriving  their  origi- 
nals from  them  ;  and,  notwithstanding  of  the  depredations  from  the  Border,  to 
which  that  place  was  frequently  liable,  and  the  burning  of  the  house  of  Craig- 
^  darroch,  I  have  seen  some  old  remains  of  its  antiquity  :  The  first  is  a  charter  that 
'-is  extant  in  the  hands  of  the  present  Laird  of  Craigdarroch,  which  is  granted  by  John 
of  Crawford,  son  to  the  Laird  of  Dalgemock,  to  John  Fergusson  Dominus  de  Craigdar- 
ioch,  his  cousin,  pro  sua  consilio  et  auxilio,  of  the  mill  of  Dalmacallan  and  Jedburgh, 
in  the  barony  of  Glencairn  in  the  shire  of  Dumfries  ;  which  charter  is  without  date, 
but  the  witnesses,  who  are  all  very  well  known,  give  us  a  very  near  view  of  the 
time :  the  witnesses  being  thus  inserted  in  the  charter,  Sir  John  Stewart,  father, 
Laird  of  Dalsvvinton,  Sir  Walter  Stewart,  Sir  John  Stewart,  Sir  Allan  Stewart,  his 
sons.  It  is  agreed  by  historians,  that  this  John  Stewart  of  Dalswinton  lived  in 
the  reign  of  David  Bruce,  and  that  he  was  taken  prisoner  with  him  at  the  battle 
of  Durham  in  the  year  1346,  and  that  the  foresaid  Walter  Stewart's  only  daughter 
and  heir  was,  in  the  year  1396,  married  to  John  Stewart,  son  to  Sir  William- 
Stewart,  sheriff  of  Tweeddale,  descended  of  the  house  of  Damly.     It  is  to  be 


92  APPENDIX. 

observed,  that  this  charter  is  backed  by  a  hand  above  a  hundred  years  old,  and  tlie 
figure  25  ib  marked  upon  it,  which  seems  to  infer,  that  twenty-four  preceding 
papers  have  been  all  lost.  The  next  is  a  curious  old  charter  in  English,  granted 
by  John  Crawfurd  of  Dalmacallan  in  Glencairn,  to  Jonkine  Fergusson  Laid  of 
Craigdarroch,  confirming  other  two  charters,  viz.  one  granted  by  John  Huck- 
tlionson  of  Crawford,  cousin  to  the  foresaid  John  Crawfurd,  of  the  four  merks 
worth  of  land  of  Jedburgh,  to  the  said  Jonkine  Fergusson,  and  another  charter 
granted  by  John  Crawfurd,  the  foresaid  John  Crawford's  son,  to  the  said  Jonkine 
Fergusson  of  the  mill  of  Jedburgh  ;  to  the  which  charter  of  confirmation  the  said 
John  Crawfurd  appends  his  seal  at  Craigdarroch  the  6th  day  of  July,  the  incarna- 
tion of  our  Lord  1398  ;  which  charter  is  backed  by  the  foresaid  old  hand,  and 
figured  twenty-eight:  and  in  the  12th  of  January  1727,  it  has  been  in  the  hands 
of  that  great  antiquary.  Sir  James  Daliymple  of  Killoch,  and  was  registrated 
at  that  time  as  a  probative  writ.  The  next  is  a  sasine  under  the  hands  of  Thomas 
Lockhart,  notar-public,  for  infefting  John  P'ergusson  of  Craigdarroch,  as  son  and 
heir  to  Mathew  Fergusson  of  Craigdarroch,  dated  the  last  day  of  April  1484. 
From  which  John  Fergusson  of  Craigdarroch  I  have  seen  a  complete  progress,  from 
father  to  son,  to  the  present  Alexander  Fergusson  of  Craigdarroch,  who  was  mar- 
vied  to  Anne  Laurie,  daughter  to  Sir  Robert  Laurie  of  Maxwelton,  and  Jean  Riddel 
his  lady ;  with  which  Anne  Laurie  he  has  these  children,  James,  Robert,  and  Jean 
Fergussons.  The  said  Alexander  was  chosen  member  of  Parliament  in  the  year 
1 71 7;  by  the  contracts  of  marriage  and  other  documents,  it  appears  they  have 
been  honourably  married  to  the  families  of  Glencairn,  Morton,  Lag,  Gadgirth, 
and  Balmaghie,  and  that  oftener  than  once. 


THE  surname  of  Lawson  is  of  good  antiquity  in  Scotland.  I  find,  in  Mr  Hay's 
collections,  mention  of  Richard  Lawson,  a  landed  gentleman,  who  was  canon  of 
St  Giles'  Kirk  in  Edinburgh,  and  Laird  of  Grotehill,  who  gives  the  said  lands  to 
Walter  Scot,  baxter,  with  the  consent  of  the  magistrates  of  Edinburgh,  about  the 
year  1370.     The  oldest  family  I  have  met  of  this  name  is 


LAWSON  OF  HuMBiE. 


I.  WiLLi.AM  Lawson  of  Humbie  is  the  first  of  this  family  I  read  of,  whom  I  find 
to  be  upon  the  service  of  Thomas  first  Lord  Somerville,  as  heir  to  his  father,  March 
1.  1406,  as  says  the  Genealogy  of  Somerville  in  manuscript. 

IL  William  Lawson  of  Humbie,  his  son ;  I  suppose  he  is  the  same  person  that 
.Dr  Abercromby,  in  his  Martial  Achievements,  Vol.  IL  p.  501,  mentions  to  be  one 
of  these  appointed  as  plenipotentiaries  to  meet  with  King  Henry  the  VIL  of  Eng- 
land's commissioners,  not  only  to  conclude  a  truce,  but  also  a  marriage  between 
our  King  James  IV.  and  the  said  Henry's  eldest  daughter,  Pqncess  Margaret,  anno 
1495.  This  the  Doctor  clearly  documents  out  of  Feed.  Aug.  torn.  12.  p.  572,  and 
the  same  Mr  William  (says  the  Doctor,  ihid.  p.  506,  out  of  the  next  p.  573  of  the 
forecited  Fad.  Ang.)  was  appointed  one  ot  the  conservators  of  a  seven  years  truce 
oetwixt  the  two  kingdoms  of  Scotland  and  England,  which  was  concluded  last 
of  September  1497. 

III.  Richard  Lawson  of  Humbie,  his  son,  has  a  charter  of  Gilchranston,  lying  in 
the  barony  of  Salton,  and  shire  of  Edinburgh,  on  resignation  of  John  Tarbat  of 
that  Ilk;  this  is  dated  anno  1505,  as  says  Scotstarvet  in  his  Collection  of  Abbre- 
viates of  Charters.     He  died  (as  says  the  Chancellary  Records)  the  24th  of  August 

iV.  Robert  Lawson  of  Humbie  his  son,  he  is  one  of  those  heros  who  signed  a 
bond  at  Hamilton,  May  8.  1569,  to  stand  by  their  sovereign  Queen   Mary,   with 
their  lives  and  fortunes  against  her  rebellious  subjects,  as  says  the  author  of  the 
2 


APPENDIX.  93. 

life  of  Qiieen  Mary,  printed  at  Edinburgh  in  octavo  1725,  p.  202.    This  Robert 
died  February  14.  1581,  as  says  the  Chancellary  Records. 

V.  John  Lawson  of  Humbie,  his  son  ;  the  Council  Records  say  he  was  cautioner 
that  John  Ramsay  of  Dalliousie  shall  not  invade  Richard  Abercromby  of  Polton  ; 
and  the  Chancellary  Records  say  he  |married  Elizabeth  Ballenden,   daughter  to 

;  which  Elizabeth  died  in  July  1630,  and  he  himself 
in  March  1598. 

VI.  Sir  James  Lawson  of  Humbie,  his  son,  was  served  heir  to  his  father  March 
4.  1607,  as  says  the  Chancellary  Records  ;  and  Alexander  Garden,  in  his  Scottish 
Worthies,  says,  he  was  a  Gentleman  of  his  Majesty's  Chamber,  a  gallant  youth  in 
the  way  of  honour,  but  was  unfortunately  drowned  beside  Aberdeen,,  in  a  standing, 
lake,  called  the  Old  Water-gang,  riding  over  rashly,  not  having  knowledge  of  the- 
ground.  This  happened  anno  1612  ;  upon  which  accident  the  fore-cited  Mr  Gar- 
den composed  the  following  poem. 

Whose  mind's  so  marbled,  and  his  heait  so  hard, 
And  who   of  steel  ivhose  stomachs  are  so  strong. 
That  would  not,  when  this  huge  mishap  was  heard, 
To  th'  utmost  note  of  sorrow  set  their  song  : 

And  elevate  their  voice  and  woes  alone, 

The  highest  strain  ot  any  troubled  tone. 
To  see  a  gallant,  with  so  great^  gi^acfi) 
So  suddenly  unthought  on,  so  o'erthrown, 
And  so  to  perish  in  so  poor  a  place, 
By  too  rash  riding  in  a  ground  unknown. 

The  flinty  fates,  that  but  all  pity  prove. 

Would  both  to  mourn  and  miseration  movej 
Yet  shall  this  death  the  defunct  not  disgrace, 
Nor  to  his  praise  prove  prejudicial, 
Since  men  of  greater  rank  have  run  like  race. 
And  lost  by  like  misfortunous  fate  and  fall : 

For  Fergus,  Dowgal,  and  King  Donald,  drown'dj. 

And  they  all  three  kings  of  this  realm  crown'd. 

VII.  John  Lawson  of  Humbie,  his  son,  was  served  heir  to  his  father  Sir  James; 
May  25.  1637,  as  says  the  Cancellary  Records. 

The  estate  of  Humbie  went  after  to  the  Hepburns,  and  this  family  is  now  ex- 
tinct ;  but  probably  the  following  Mr  Richard  Lawson,  Justice-Clerk,  has  been  a 
son,  or  descended  of  a  son  of  the  same. 


LAWSON  OF  Heiriggs,  Lochtulloch,  Boghall,  and  Cambo. 


I.  MR  RICHARD  LAWSON  of  Heiriggs,  it  is  presumable,  was  a  son  of  the  house 
of  Humbie.  He  was  made  Justice-Clerk  about  the  year  1488,  and  one  of  the  coun- 
sellors appointed  for  managing  the  affairs  of  King  James  IV.  during  his  minority, 
anno  1490,  as  says  Dr  Abercromby  in  his- Martial  Achievements,  vol.  ii.  page  496, 
whicli  he  instructs  out  of  the  Black  Acts,  fol.  87,  He  was  also  appointed  one  of 
the  plenipotentiaries  to  meet  at  Coldstream  with  those  of  England,  for  prolonging 
the  truce,  which  was  agreed  to  the  21st  December  1492,  ibid,  page  498.  This 
the  Doctor  documents  out  of  Feed.  Angl.  torn.  12.  page  467.  And  again  he  was 
chosen  one  of  the  commissioners  appointed  to  meet  at  Ayton  with  the  English 
commissioners,  for  a  treaty,  anno  1497,  ibid.  p.  505.  This  the  Doctor  also  in- 
structs out  of  the  said  Feed.  Angl.  p.  673.  Moreover  in  Scotstarvet's  Collection  of 
Abbreviates  of  Charters,  I  find  this  Mr  Richard  gets  a  charter  of  a  tenement  of 
land  in  Edinburgh,  which  pertained  to  Henry  Tait,  bastard;  this  is  dated  i8th 
February  1491.  And  there  is  in  the  present  Cairnmuir's  custody  an  instrument 
of  sasine  of  the  fourth  part  of  the  lands  of  Cambo,  in  favours  of  this  Mr  Richard. 

Vol.  II.  5  H 


94 


APPENDIX. 


Lawson,  upon  a  precept  of  sasine  granted  by  George  bishop  of  Dunkeld,  following 
upon  a  resignation  by  Janet  Baillie  and  John  Gifford  her  husband.  This  is  dated 
the  i6th  January  1500.  There  is  also  a  charter  of  alienation  granted  by  Andrew 
Graham  of  Knockdollian  and  Cairnmuir,  to  the  said  Richard  and  Janet  Elphin- 
ston  his  spouse,  of  the  seven  merk  land  of  Cairnmuir.  This  is  dated  the  27th 
April  1500,  and  the  sasine  following  thereupon  is  of  the  same  date  ;  and  George, 
bishop  of  Dunkeld,  his  precept  of  sashie  following  thereupon  is  dated  the  loth 
November  that  same  year ;  and  afterwards  the  said  Andrew  Graham  of  Cairn- 
muir grants  another  charter,  in  favours  of  the  said  Mr  Richard  and  his  spouse,  of 
the  lands  of  Cairnmuir,  to  be  holden  of  the  granter,  which  is  dated  17th  June 
1503  ;  and  his  procuratory  of  resignation  of  these  l^nds,  in  favours  of  the  said  Mr 
Richard  and  his  spouse,  is  dated  the  same  day  ;  and  the  said  Andrew's  precept  of 
sasine  following  hereupon  is  dated  the  next  day ;  and  the  instrument  of  sasine  fol- 
lowing upon  the  foresaid  precept  is  dated  the  26th  September  thereafter;  and 
John  Earl  of  Morton  confirms  all,  by  his  charter  dated  17th  September  1503  ;  and 
upon  the  12th  June  this  same  year,  this  Andrew  Graham  grants  an  obligation  to 
Mr  Richard,  containing  warrandice  for  the  entry  of  the  said  Andrew  Graham  his 
heirs  to  the  Earls  of  Morton,  upon  the  decease  of  him  and  his  successors.  This  is 
dated  the  1 8th  June  1503.  Scotstarvet,  in  his  Staggering  State,  says,  that  this 
Mr  Richard  purchased  also  a  good  estate  near  the  Burrow-Loch,  as  also  the  lands 
of  Boghall.  ^ 

This  Mr  Richard  Lawson  died  about  the  year  1508.  He  married  Janet  Elphin- 
ston,  daughter  to  .     I  find  in  the  fore-cited  Collection  of 

Abbreviates  of  Charters  by  Scotstarvet,  mention  of  a  mortification  granted  by  this 
Janet,  (therein  designed  relict  of  Mr  Richard  Lawson  of  Heiriggs}  whereby  she 
mortifies  to  a  chaplain  in  St  Giles's  Kirk  in  Edinburgh,  founded  by  Alexander 
Lauder,  Provost  of  Edinburgh,  with  consent  of  Robert  Lawson,  her  son,  seven 
merks  yearly  out  of  a  tenement  in  Edinburgh,  and  10  lib.  out  of  Cramond  Regis, 
conquest  by  her  from  Janet,  daughter  and  one  of  the  heirs  of  William  Baillie  of 
Cambo.  By  this  marriage  Mr  Richard  begat  with  his  said  lady  three  sons,  viz, 
\st,  James  his  successor;  2d,  Richard;  and  3^,  Robert  Lawson,  both  successively 
lairds  of  Cairnmuir  ;  of  whom  afterwards. 

IL  James  Lawson  of  Heiriggs,  &c.  his  eldest  son  and  heir ;  there  is  in  the  pre- 
sent Cairnmuir's  custody  a  precept  of  dare  constat  granted  by  this  James,  in  fa- 
vour of  Mr  Patrick  Lawson,  as  heir  to  Richard,  his  brother-german,  in  the  lands 
of  Cairnmuir.  This  is  dated  the  5th  November  1526,  and  the  sasine  following 
hereupon  is  dated  the  next  day  thereafter.     This  James  married  Janet,  daughter 

to  — Liddel  of  Lochtulloch.     Scotstarvet,  in  his  Collection  of  Abbreviates 

of  Charters,  mentions  a  charter  wherein  this  James,  (which  he  by  mistake  calls 
Robert)  son  of  Mr  Richard  Lawson  of  Heiriggs,  gets  with  Janet  Liddel,  heiress  of 
Lochtulloch,  (whom  he  was  to  marry)  the  lands  of  Lochtulloch,  Boghall,  Star- 
daills,  and  Denyss,  lying  in  the  barony  of  Bathgate  and  shire  of  Renfrew,  and  the 
same  is  provided  to  their  heirs,  which  failing,  to  her  heirs,  dated  1507. 

III.  John  Lawson  of  Heiriggs  and  Lochtulloch,  his  son  ;  there  is  {penes  Cairn- 
muir) an  instrument  of  sa<:ine  of  the  lands  of  Cairnmuir  in  favour  of  this  John, 
son  and  heir  to  James  of  Heiriggs,  upon  a  precept  of  clare  constat  granted  by  Ro- 
bert Graham  of  Knockdollian,  dated  15th  December  1556,  and  the  sasine  follow- 
ing hereupon  is  dated  the  ist  of  February  1556.  There  is  also  a  precept  of  clare 
constat  granted  by  the  said  Robert  to  tliis  John,  of  the  ten  pound  land  of  Cairn- 
muir. This  is  dated  i6th  May  that  same  year;  and  there  is  another  precept  of 
clare  constat  by  ditto  to  ditto  in  the  said  lands,  dated  19th  December  that  same 
year  ;  and  there  is  a  charter  granted  by  the  fore-cited  Robert  Graham  of  Knock- 
dollian to  this  John,  of  the  lands  of  Cairnmuir,  dated  13th  April  1584,  and  the 
sasine  following  thereupon  is  of  the  same  date,  which  are  confirmed  by  John  Earl 
of  Morton  the  i6th  of  that  same  month. 

This  John  married  Christian,  daughter  to  Sir  William  Livingston  of  Kilsyth, 
by  whom  he  had  two  sons,  Sir  William  and  John,  who  succeeded  each  other  in  the 
estate  of  Boghall,  and  a  daughter,  Katharine,  who  was  married  to  Mr  James 
Primrose,  ancestor  to  the  Viscount  of  Primrose,  as  says  Mr  Crawfurd  in  his  Peer- 
age. 


APPENDIX. 


95 


rV.  Sir  William  Lawson  of  Lochtulloch  and  Boghall,  his  son.  There  is  in  the 
present  Cairnmuir's  charter-chest  a  chnrter  of  the  lands  of  Cairnmuir,  granted  by 
John  Graham  of  Knockdolhan,  to  VVilham,  son  and  heir  served  and  retoured  to 
John  his  father.  This  is  dated  ytli  December  1594,  and  the  sasine  following  here- 
upon is  dated  29th  July  1595.  There  is  also  an  instrument  of  sasine  of  the  lands 
of  Dundryon,  in  the  barony  of  Inverleith  and  shire  of  Edinburgh,  granted  in  fa- 
vour of  this  William,  on  a  charter  granted  to  him  by  Sir  George  Towers  of  In- 
nerleith,  dated  12th  of  December  1607:  and  there  is  a  charter  granted  by  Wil- 
ham  Earl  of  Morton  of  the  lands  of  Cairnmuir,  in  favour  of  this  William  Law- 
son  of  Boghall,  holding  blench,  upon  a  decreet  before  the  Lords  of  Session,  dated 
the  last  day  of  December  1607,  and  the  instrument  of  sasine  following  heieupon 
is  dated  izd  August  1608.  There  is  also  a  precept  of  sasine  upon  a  retour  by 
Alexander  bishop  of  Dunkeld,  in  tavour  of  this  Sir  William  Lawson  of  Boghall, 
as  heir  to  John  Lawson  of  Lochtulloch,  his  father,  of  the  fourth  part  of  the  lands 
of  Cambo,  dated  last  of  January  1609  ;  the  sasine  following  hereupon  is  dated  the 
15th  April  thereafter.     1  find  also  in  the  Council  Records  that  this  Sir   William 

and Hamilton  of  Bathgate,  are  ordered  to  find  caution  not  to  assault  each 

other.  This  happened  ^/nno  1607  ;  and  he  and  Hamilton  of  Innerwick  are  char- 
ged by  the  Lords  of  Privy  Council  to  keep  the  peace,  25th  June  1608.  Scotstar- 
vet,  in  his  Staggering  State,  says,  "  This  Sir  William  dilapidate  and  put  away 
"  most  of  his  fortune  before  his  death,  and  went  to  Holland  to  the  wars."  He 
died  in  May  162S,  as  says  the  Chancellary  Records. 

V.  John  Lawson  of  Boghall  is  served  heir  to  Sir  William  his  brother,  the  i8th 
April  1629,  as  narrates  the  Chancellary  Records. 

Not^.  All  the  foresaid  families  of  the  surname  of  Lawson  being  now  extinct, 
and  their  estates  possessed  by  other  families,  the  only  remaining  family  in  Scotland 
(of  any  long  standing)  of  this  surname,  is  Lawson  of  Cairnmuir,  who  undoubtedly 
is  chief  of  the  name  ;  an  account  of  whose  family  follows. 


LAWSON  OF  Cairnmuir. 


I.  RICHARD  LAWSON  of  Cairnmuir  was  second  son  to  Mr  Richard  Lawson 
of  Heiriggs,  &-c.  Lord  Justice-Clerk,  (as  is  narrated  before)  and  his  lady  Janet 
Elphinston.  There  is  in  the  present  Laird  of  Cairnmuir's  custody  an  instrument 
of  sasine  of  the  lands  of  Cairnmuir,  given  by  the  said  Mr  Richard,  propriis  manibus, 
to  this  Richard  his  son,  which  is  dated  the  10th  of  October  1504  :  And  there  is  a 
charter  granted  by  the  said  Mr  Richard  and  his  said  spouse,  to  this  Richard  their 
son,  of  the  said  lands,  dated  i8th  March  1507;  but  it  seems  he  had  died 
soon  after  without  issue,  and  was  succeeded  in  his  fortune  by  his  brother  Ro- 
bert. 

II.  Robert  Lawson  of  Cairnmuir,  his  brother,  third  son  to  the  foresaid  Mr 
Richard  Lawson  of  Heiriggs,  Justice-Clerk.  There  is  {penes  Cairnmuir^  a  precept 
of  dare  constat,  granted  by  Andrew  Graham  of  Knockdollian  in  favour  of  this 
Robert,  as  heir  to  Mr  Richard,  his  father,  in  the  lands  of  Cairnmuir.  This  is  dated 
the  23d  April  1510,  and  the  sasine  following  hereupon  is  dated  the  last  of  that  same 
month. 

This  Robert  married  Janet,  daughter  to  William  Baillie  of  Cambo,  by  whom  he 
had  James  his  successor,  and  Richard  Lawson. 

III.  James  Lawson  of  Cairnmuir  his  son.  There  is  a  precept  of  dare  constat 
by  Robert  Graham  of  Knockdollian,  in  favour  of  this  James,  as  heir  to  Robert  his 
father  in  the  lands  of  Cairnmuir,  which  is  dated  the  9th  May  1521,  and  the  sasine 
following  hereon  is  dated  the  i8th  June  thereafter. 

This  James   married Veitch,  daughter  to Veitch  of  Dawick,, 

by  whom  he  had  two  soos^  George  his  successor,  and  Patrick  of  Borland. 

2 


5,6  APPENDIX. 

IV.  George  Lawson  of  Cairnmuir,  his  son,  had  also  the  estate  of  Borland.  There 
is  in  the  present  Cairnmuir's  custody  an  instrument  of  -sasine  in  favour  of  this 
George,  as  heir  to  Patrick  Lawson  his  brother-german,  on  a  precept  of  dare  con- 
stat granted  by  John,  son  and  heir  to  James  Lawson  of  Heiriggs,  with  consent  of  his 
tutors.  This  is  dated  5th  July  1553,  and  which  sasine  is  dated  the  8th  of  that 
■«me  month;  and  there  is  another  sasine  of  the  lands  of  Cambo,  in  favour  of 
this  George,  on  the  foresaid  precept  of  the  same  date.  He  is  retoured  heir  in  ge- 
neral to  Richard  Lawson,  his  father's  brother,  5th  September  1554.  There  is  a 
reversion  granted  by  Mr  WiUiam  Crichton,  parson  of  Eddleston,  to  this  George 
Lawson  of  Borland,  of  an  annualrent  of  twenty  merles  Scots  forth  of  the  lands  of 
Cammock,  for  payment  of  twelve  score  ten  merks,  dated  5th  May  1556.  And 
there  is  another  reversiorf  granted  by  John  Carkettle  of  Fmgland  to  this  George 
of  the  lands  of  Cambo,  for  payment  of  forty  pound  Scots,  dated  April  1558.  There 
is  moreover  a  precept  of  sasine  by  John  Lawson,  immediate  superior  of  the  lands 
of  Cairnmuir,  with  consent  of  his  curator,  in  favours  of  this  George,  son  to  James 
Lawson,  as  heir  to  Mr  Patrick  Lawson  his  uncle,  upon  a  retour  before  the  regality 
of  Dalkeith,  dated  25th  June  1558  ;  and,  besides,  there  is  a  reversion  granted  by 
John  Stewart  of  Traquair,  to  this  George  Lawson  of  Borland,  for  payment  of  forty 
shillings  Scots,  dated  16th October  1558.  There  is  another  reversion  granted  by  John, 
son  and  heir  to  sometime  Manchane,  burgess  of  Edinburgh,  with  consent  of  his  cura- 
tors, to  John  Stewart  of  Traquair,  of  an  annualrent  of  twenty  pound  Scots,  granted  by 
the  said  John  Stewart,  with  consent  of  this  George  Lawson  of  Borland,  his  su- 
perior, forth  of  the  lands  of  Cairnmuir,  for  payment  of  300  merks  Scots,  This  is 
dated  anno  1562. 

This  George  married daughter  to by  whom  he  had  James 

his  successor. 

V.  James  Lawson  of  Cairnmuir  his  son.  There  is  (^penes  Cairnmuir)  a  charter 
by  George  to  this  James,  his  son  and  apparent  heir,  of  the  lands  of  Cairnmuir, 
which  is  dated  1560,  and  the  sasine  following  hereupon  is  dated  7th  July  1582. 
There  is  also  an  mstrument  of  resignation  of  the  said  lands  by  John  Stewart  of 
Traquair,  in  the  hands  of  the  said  George  his  superior,  in  favour  of  this  James, 
dated  21st  July  1565.  There  is  another  charter  granted  by  Mr  Mark  Ker  of 
Prestongrange  to  this  James,  of  the  lands  of  Skiprigg,  dated  the  4th  June  1582, 
and  the  sasine  hereupon  is  dated  the  14th  of  the  same  month.  His  father  gives 
him  another  charter  of  the  lands  of  Cairnmuir,  to  be  holden  of  John  Lawson  of 
Heiriggs,  his  superior,  which  is  dated  3d  July  1582,  and  the  said  John  of  Heiriggs 
confirms  the  same  by  his  charter,  dated  the  next  day  after,  and  the  charter  of  con- 
firmation under  the  Great  Seal,  confirming  the  charters  following,  viz.  a  charter  by 
John  Earl  of  Morton  to  Robert  Graham  of  Knockdolhan  of  the  lands  of  Cairnmuir, 
dated  26th  March  1584;  charter  by  the  said  Robert  to  John  Lawson  of  Loch- 
tuUoch,  of  the  said  lands,  dated  13th  April  1584;  charter  by  the  said  LochtuUoch 
to  George  Lawson  of  Cairnmuir,  of  the  said  lands,  of  the  same  date;  and  a  charter 
by  the  said  George  to  this  James  his  son,  of  the  said  lands,  and  dated  nth  Sep- 
tember 1584,  and  the  royal  charter  of  confirmation  of  them  all  is  dated  2d  January 
J584.  There  is  also  a  charter  granted  to  this  James  by  his  father,  of  the  lands  of 
Cairnmuir,  in  implement  of  a  contract  betwixt  them,  dated  May  27.  1584,  and 
this  charter  is  dated  the  i  ith  September  that  same  year,  and  the  sasine  followmg 
hereupon  is  dated  the  8th  of  February  1584. 

This  James  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  to  William  Scott  of  Mountbeugar,  by 
whom  he  had  Mr  James  his  successor. 

VI.  Mr  James  Lawson  of  Cairnmuir  his  son.  He  gets  a  charter  from  his  father 
of  the  lands  of  Cairnmuir,  and  fourth  part  of  Cambo,  in  implement  of  his  contract 
of  marriage  with  Elizabeth,  daughter  to  Gilbert  Brown  of  Hartrees,  which  is  dated 
May  20.  1619,  and  the  sasine  following  hereupon  is  dated  July  6.  1622;  and  there 
is  in  the  present  Cairnmuir's  custody  a  chart?.-  of  confirmation  of  the  foresaid 
charter  granted  by  Sir  William  Lawson  of  Boghall,  dated  July  10.  that  same  year. 
There  is  also  a  charter  granted  by  John  Lord  Stewart  of  Traquair,  of  the  lands  of 
Cairnmuir,  to  this  Mr  James  in  liferent,  and  James  his  son  in  fee,  to  be  holden 
blench  of  the  said  Lord,  dated  12th  September  1631,  and  the  sasine  following 
hereupon  is  dated  the  7th  of  November  thereafter.     There  is  also  an  instrument 


APPENDIX.  07 

ofsasine  in  the  lands  of  Ingraston  and  Maidenhead,  with  pasturage  upon  Blyth- 
holni,  and  the  muiv  adjacent,  lying  in  the  parish  and  barony  ot  Linton,  and  shire 
of  Peebles,  as  principal,  and  the  lands  of  Ormiston,  in  the  parish  ot  Innerliethen,  in 
warrandice,  in  favour  of  this  Mr  James  of  Cairnmuir  and  his  said  spouse,  following 
upon  a  contract  betwixt  them  on  the  one  part,  and  the  commissioners  for  John 
Earl  of  Traquair,  then  out  of  the  kingdom,  on  the  other  part;  this  is  dated  the  last 
of  July  1650.  This  Mr  James  gets  a  disposition  from  the  Earl  of  Truquair  and 
Lord  Linton,  of  the  lands  of  Ligraston  and  Maidenhead,  which  is  dated  the  23d 
Dec'-mber  1653  ;  and  the  charter  of  alienation  of  tlie  said  lands,  as  for  the  princi- 
pal, and  the  lands  of  Fingland,  in  the  barony  and  paristi  of  Newlands,  in  warran- 
dice, is  granted  by  John  Earl  of  Traquair^  and  John  Lord.  Linton  his  son,  to  the 
said  Mr  James,  tlie  said  day,  and  the  sasine  hereupon  is  dated  the  21st  of  February 
1654.  This  Mr  James  was  appointed  one  of  the  committee  of  Parliament  for 
Peebles-shire,  for  putting  the  kingdom  in  a  posture  of  defence,  February  15.  1659, 
as  is  narrated  in  the  rescinded  acts  of  Parliament. 

This  Mr  James  married  Ehzabeth,  daughter  to  Gilbert  Brown  of  Hartrees,  by 
whom  he  had  James  his  successor. 

VIL  James  Lawson  of  Cairnmuir  his  son..  There  is  {penes  Cairnmuir)  a  charter 
granted  by  his  father  to  him,  upon  his  contract  of  marriage  with  Isabel  Muirhead, 
of  the  lands  of  Ingraston  and  Maidenhead,  as  principal,  and  the  lands  of  Fingland, 
in  warrandice  thereof,  to  be  holden  of  the  disponer:  this  is  dated  May  4.  1655: 
Besides  there  is  a  tack  of  the  teinds  of  Cairnmuir  betwixt  this  James  and  the  Earl 
of  Tweeddale,  which  is  dated  the  12th  March  1679.  I  find  in  the  Council  Re- 
■cords  this  James  is  convened  before  the  Lords  of  Privy  Council  in  June  1684,  for 
not  dissipating  conventicles  on  his  ground  ;  and  he  was  after  a  prosecutor  of  the 
episcopal  ministers  anno  1689. 

He  married  Isabel,  daughter  to  John  Muirhead  of  Linhouse,  by  whom  he  had- 
John  his  successor. 

VIII.  John  Lawson  of  Cairnmuir  his  son.  There  is  in  the  present  Cairnmuir's 
charter-chest  a  procuratory  of  resignation  of  the  lands  of  Cairnmuir,  Ingraston,  and 
Maidenhead,  granted  by  James  Lawson  of  Cairnmuir  in  favour  of  himself  in  Ufe- 
rent,  and  this  John,  his  son,  in  fee,  which  is  dated  the  13th  July  1682;  and  the  in- 
strument of  resignation  hereupon  is  dated  the  19th  of  the  same  month  and  year  ; 
and  the  charter  granted  upon  both  by  John  Earl  of  Tweeddale,  in  fiivour  of  this 
James,  and  this  John  his  son,  of  the  said  lands,  is  dated  the  same  day ;  and  the 
sasine  upon  this  charter  is  dated  December  3.  1685.  This  John  gets  also  a  dis- 
position in  his  favour  from  John  Law,  of  the  lands  of  Netherurd  and  Bryandland, 
which  is  dated  December  22.  1699,  and  the  sasine  following  hereupon  is  dated  26th 
January  1700  ;  and  the  said  John  Law  resigns  the  foresaid  lands  of  Bryandland  in 
the  hands  of  Anne  Dutchess  of  Buccleugh,  in  favour  of  this  John  of  Cairnmuir,  as 
bears  the  instrument  of  resignation,  dated  January  28.  1701,  and  the  charter  fol- 
lowing thereupon,  to  be  holden  feu  of  the  said  Dutchess,  is  dated  January  28. 
1 701.  There  is  a  tack  of  the  teinds  of  Cairnmuir  betwixt  this  John  and  William 
Earl  of  March,  which  is  dated  May  7.  1700. 

This  John  Lawson  of  Cairnmuir  married  Barbara,  daughter  .to  Sir  John  Clerk  of 
Pennycuik,  by  whom  he  had  John  his  successor. 

IX.  John  Lawson,  the  present  Laird  of  Cairnmuir,  &c.  His  son  was  served 
heir  to  his  father  in  general  before  the  bailies  of  Edinburgh,  as  bears  his  general 
retour,  dated  the  6th  of  October  1705;  and  he  was  served  heir  in  special  to  his 
said  father  in  the  lands  of  Cairnmuir,  Ingraston,  and  Maidenhead,  as  principal, 
and  the  lands  of  Fingland,  in  warrandice,  before  the  Macers  of  Council  and  Session, 
as  bears  his  special  retour,  dated  29th  January  1719;  and  upon  said  service  there 
is  a  precept  of  dare  constat  by  William  Earl  of  March  of  the  haill  above  lands, 
in  his  favour,  as  heir  to  his  father,  as  said  is,  dated  19th  March  1 719,  and  the 
sasine  following  thereupon  dated  27th  March  1719;  and  also  he  has  an  instrument 
of  resignation  of  the  eight  prebend  lands  of  Netherurd,  and  mill  and  mill-lands 
thereof,  in  liis  favour,  which  is  dated  13th  November  1707;  and  the  charter  of 
resignation  of  the  said  lands,  granted  by  Anne  Dutchess  of  Hamilton  in  his  favour, 
is  dated  the  sane  day;  and  the  sasine  following  thereupon  is  dated  the  9th  of  De- 
cember thereafter. 

Vol.  IL  5! 


t)i  APPENDIX. 

This  present  Cairnmuir  hath  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  to  Bryce  Semple  of 
Cathcart,  by  whom  he  hath  a  son  to  succeed  him  named  Richard. 


M'DOWALL  OF  Logan. 


LOGAN  would  have  rested  satisfied  with  what  is  recorded  of  his  family  by  Mi 
Nisbet  in  his  System  of  Heraldry,  Part  IL  page  284.  but  that  in  this  Appendix 
there  is  a  long  chapter  concerning  M'Dowall  of  Freugh,  wherein  a  clamr  of  chief- 
ship  is  set  up  by  Freugh,  which  was  never  before  heard  of,  and  Mr  Nisbet  (if  it  is 
his  performance)  seems  to  favour  his  pretensions :  Wherefore,  that  falsehood  may 
not  be  imposed  for  truth,  Logan  shall  make  some  few  observations  upon  this  sub- 
ject, which  indeed  is  of  itself  most  trifling;  but  since  Freugh  has  flattered  himself 
with  such  idle  amusements,  justice  must  be  done  to  those  whom  he  would  other- 
wise thereby  injure.  » 

And,  in  the  first  place,  Freugh  has  no  warrant-  or  authority  to  use  arms,  the- 
same  having  never  been  matriculated  in  the  Lyon  Register,  nor  to  be  found  in  any 
collection  of  arms ;  so  that  1  cannot  see  how  he  can  pretend  to  carry  arms  at  all, 
and  much  less  to  be  chief  of  the  name.  All  the  voucher  of  his  arms  is,  that  they 
are  said  to  be  cut  on  a  window-board  and  bed,  which  he  pretends  belonged  to  the 
old  House  of  Freugh ;  but  as  these  are  no  authentic  evidence  of  such  arms,  so  it 
were  a  kind  of  miracle,  if  they  had  been  preserved,  when  that  House  of  Freugh 
v.'as  burned  by  the  English,  as  he  here  affirms  it  was:  It  is  likewise  surprising, 
that,  since  by  the  old  law  and  custom  writs  were  sealed  with  the  granter's  seal, 
and  not  subscribed  at  all  till  the  act  requiring  also  the  subscription,  par.  1540, 
cap.  117,  none  of  the  old  writs  that  instruct  the  long  series  of  his  ancestors  bear 
their  arms  upon  their  seals :  It  is  therefore  incumbent  upon  Freugh,  in  the  first 
place,  to  show  by  what  authority  he  bears  arms  at  all,  for  the  antiquity  of  his  fa- 
mily must  principally  appear  from  the  arms  they  have  right  to  bear. 

It  is  plain,  from  the  several  acts  of  Parliament  concerning  the  power  and  office 
of  the  Lyon  King  at  Arms,  act  127.  Par.  1592.  p.  1672.  act  21.  that  he  and  his 
brother  heralds  were  to  visit  the  arms  of  the  whole  noblemen,  barons,  and  gentle- 
men, borne  and  used  within  the  kingdom,  and  to  matriculate  them  in  their  books 
and  registers,  and  to  fine  in  L.  100  all  who  shall  unjustly  usurp  arms,  and  to  escheat 
and  forfeit  all  such  goods  as  shall  have  unwarrantable  arms  engraven  on  them  ; 
and  letters  of  publication  are  directed  to  be  execute  at  the  market  crosses  of  the 
several  royal  burghs,  head  burghs  of  shires,  stewartries  and  bailieries  within  the 
kingdom,  charging  all  who  make  use  of  any  arms  or  signs  armorial,  within  the 
space  of  one  year  after  the  said  publication,  to  bring  or  send  an  account  of  what 
arras  or  signs  armorial  they  are  accustomed  to  use,  and  whether  they  be  descended 
of  any  family,  the  arms  of  which  family  they  bear,  and  of  what  brother  of  the 
family  they  are  descended,  with  testificates  from  persons  of  honour  touching  the 
verity  of  their  having  and  using  these  arms,  and  of  their  descent,  to  the  effect  that 
the  Lvon  King  at  Arms  may  distinguish  the  said  arms  with  congruent  differences, 
and  matriculate  the  same  in  his  books  and  registers,  and  give  arms  to  virtuous  and 
well  deserving  persons  ;  and  it  is  statute,  that  the  said  register  shall  be  respected 
as  the  true  and  unrepealable  rule  of  all  arms  and  bearings  in  Scotland. 

It  is  therefore  most  certain,  that  if  the  family  of  Freugh  had  at  the  time  of  these 
acts  been  entitled  to  wear  arms,  or  any  pretensions  to  noble  descent,  they  would 
have  taken  the  benefit  of  these  acts,  as  the  family  of  Logan  did,  by  getting  then- 
arms  marticulate  in  anno  1676,  which,  Mr  Nisbet  observes,  Part  U.  p.  284.  are 
found  in  the  Lyon  Register  the  same  as  at  this  day :  Wherefore  Freugh's  using  ar- 
morial bearings  or  arms  must  be  an  usurpation,  they  not  having  been  matriculate, 
and  his  fancy  of  being  descended  of  Gilbert  Earl  of  Carrick  vain  and  groundless ; 
and  whether  Gilbert  was  elder  or  younger  brother  to  Ethred,  grandfather  to  Allan 
Lord  of  Galloway,  is  no  matter  to  Freugh,  who  does  not  seem  to  have  any  interest 


APPENDIX.  oa 

m  that  noble  family,  or  otherwise  he  was  bound  to  vouch  his  descent  and  title  to 
carry  anii^,  as  is  directed  in  the  foresaid  acts:  Nor  indeed  was  ever  Gilbert  Earl 
ofCarrick,  but  his  son  Duncan,  who  married  the  heiress  ot  Carrick,  and  there- 
upon changed  his  name  from  M'Dowall  to  Carrick,  if  credit  is  to  be  given  to  his- 
torians ;  Buchanan,  p.  363,  and  Sir  James  Dalrymple,  p.  363,  informs  us,  that 
Gilbert  was  Ethred's  younger  brother,  and  most  barbarously  murdered  him. 

What  is  further  advanced  by  Freugh  is  hardly  worth  noticing ;  that  Dowallton, 
which  he  pretends  belonged  to  his  predecessors,  was  the  ancient  residence  of  the 
Lords  of  Galloway,  is  without  foundation;  for  it  is  well  known,  that  all  the  places, 
town-lands,  and  even  hills  in  Galloway  have  Irish  names,  which  was  their  language 
till  within  Lhese  150  years,  and  this  town-land,  which  is  far  from  being  a  baiony, 
was  known  to  have  been  called  formerly  Belielochquhan  (i.  e.  Lochtown,  from  a 
lych  there)  till  of  late  (as  the  story  goes)  one  M'Dowall,  a  natural  soil  of  Garth- 
land,  lived  there,  who  being  a  notorious  thief  and  a  robber,  that  little  town-land 
had  Its  name  afterwards  from  him. 

Sir  George  Mackenzie  tells  us,  page  3.  sect.  11.  that  M'Dowall  is  known  to  be 
among  the  ancientesr  surnames  of  Scotland,  because  he  bears  a  lion  collared  with 
an  open  crown  about  his  neck,  in  remembrance  of  Dovallus  his  predecessor  killing 
the  tyrant  Nothatus,  who  lived  many  years  before  Christ.  Mr  Nisbet  owns  the 
same,  Fart  II.  p.  282  and  283,  and  likewise  that  the  arms  of  the  old  Lords  of  Gal- 
loway were  iKure,  a  lion  rampant  anient,  collared  with  an  antique  crown  or  ; 
now,  these  aie  the  very  arms  used  M'Dowall  of  Logan  at  this  day,  and  are  record- 
ed the  same  in  the  Lyon  Register,  and  neither  Garthland  nor  Freugh,  nor  any 
other  family  of  the  name  use  these  arms,  which  are  the  same  with  these  of  the  old 
Lords  of  Galloway  ;  and  therefore  it  may  justly  be  concluded  that  Logan  has  the 
best  pretensions  of  being  the  true  and  lineal  heir-male  of  that  family,  for  his  arms 
being  simple,  without  addition  of  any  other  figure,  is  one  great  argument  of  his 
being  chief  of  the  family. 

It  is  true  Mr  Nisbet,  page  283,  pretends  to  instruct  from  Camden  in  his  Bri- 
tannia, that  Henry  I.  King  of  England  gave  a  grant  to  Fergus  Lord  of  Gal- 
loway, for  some  special  services,  of  having  the  lion  crowned  ;  after  which  that  fa- 
mily had  the  lion  crowned,  neglecting  to  have  it  collared  only  with  an  open 
crown. 

But,  in  thzfrst  place,  this  is  a  plain  mistake,  for  Camden  says  no  such  thing. 
His  words  are,  page  741.  "  Gallovidia  hcec  suos  olim  principes  &-  Dominos  habuit 
"  quorum  primus  qui  annalium  monumentis  celebratur  erat  Fergusius  regnante 
"  Henrico  primo  in  Anglia,  cai  pro  insignibus  erat  leo  argenteus  erectus  &•  coro- 
"  natus  in  parma  cerulea  ;"  where  it  is  plain  Camden  only  tells  us,  that  Galloway 
of  old  had  its  own  princes,  of  which  Fergus  was  the  chief,  who  lived  in  the  time 
of  Henry  I.  and  carried  the  arms  there  described,  but  does  not  in  the  least  men- 
tion any  grant  from  Henry  King  of  England  in  favour  of  Fergus,  for  changing 
his  arms  from  a  lion  collared  with  an  open  crown  to  a  lion  crowned  ;  and  it  were 
absurd  to  imagine,  that  a  Scots  peer  would  have  applied  to  the  King  of  England 
for  any  such  purpose,  and  would  have  been  directly  against  the  foresaid  acts  of 
Parliament,  and  indeed  were  contrary  to  the  nature  of  the  thing,  since  all  honours 
and  armorial  bearings  must  proceed  from  the  proper  sovereign  ;  nor  is  there  any 
evidence  of  the  Lords  of  Galloway  ever  having  changed  their  arms  in  the  foresaid 
manner  ;  and  Camden's  account  of  Fergus's  arms  must  be  corrected  by  our  own' 
historians  and  authors,  who  inform  us,  that  the  family  bore  the  lion  collared  with 
an  open  crown. 

In  the  next  place,  though  the  Lords  of  Galloway  had  changed  their  bearing  to 
a  lion  crowned,  yet  that  could  not  alter  the  case;  for,  as  to  Garthland,  though  in- 
deed at  present  he  bears  the  lion  crowned,  yet  formerly  he  bore  the  lion  gorged 
with  an  open  crown,  standing  upon  a  rock  in  a  water,  or  sea  in  base  ;  Nisbet,  Do. 
page  283;  and  therefore  he  cannot  plead  from  his  new  bearing  any  antiquity  :  and 
as  to  his  old  arms,  since  they  have  such  additions,  it  cannot  be  supposed  that  he 
represents  the  principal  family  in  competition  with  Logan,  who  has  no  addition: 
and  as  to  Freugh,  it  has  been  already  observed  that  his  arms  are  without  any  au- 
thority, though  he.  to  make  sure  work,  has  assumed  the  lion  crowned  with  an  im- 
perial crown,  and  likewise  gorged  with  an  antique  crown,  supported   by  two  wild  , 


ioo  APPENDIX 

men,  Nisb.  Part  II.  page  285.  But  this  is  all  usurpation,  for  the  pretended  sup- 
porters were  taken  up  by  the  present  Freugh  at  his  own  hand. 

This  leads  to  another  strong  proof  of  Logan's  being  chief  of  the  name  and  fa- 
mily ;  it  is  that  he  not  only  carries  simple  arms,  the  same  with  these  of  the  old 
Lords  of  Galloway,  but  likewise  uses  supporters.  Now  it  is  most  certain,  that  the 
right  of  using  supporters  is  hereditary  with  us  to  the  lineal  heirs  and  representa- 
tives of  families,  bat  not  proper  to  the  younger  sons  or  collaterals,  unless  they  be- 
come represeiitatives  of  the  family,  as  Mr  Nisbet  observes,  Part  IV.  p.  33.  And 
Sir  George  Mackenzie,  cap.  31.  plainly  informs  us,  that  all  our  chiefs  of  families 
and  old  barons  in  Scotland  may  use  supporters,  and  have  prescribed  a  right  to  it ; 
and  he  further  observes,  that  de  jure  barons  may  use  supporters,  for  as  such  they 
were  members  of  Parliament  with  us  of  old,  and  never  lost  that  privilege,  though, 
for  their  conveniency,  they  were  allowed  to  be  represented  by  two  of  their  num- 
ber for  each  shire  ;  and,  therefore,  such  as  were  barons  before  that  time  may  have 
supporters  as  well  as  lord  barons :  The  consequence  whereof  is,  that  when  the  fa- 
mily of  Logan  used  supporters,  they  were  owned  to  be  the  chief  of  the  name,  in 
place  of  the  ancient  Lords  of  Galloway,  and  was  one  of  these  barons  that  had  title 
to  sit  in  Parliament,  which  it  is  plain  Garthland  and  Freugh  were  not,  since  they 
never  used  supporters,  according  to  Sir  George  Mackenzie's  foresaid  reasoning. 
Garthland  has  owned,  Nisbet,  do.  page  283,  that  in  these  days  he  held  his  lands 
of  the  family  of  Douglas  ;  the  oldest  charter  he  produces,  anno  1413,  being-from 
them,  and  so  could  have  no  claim  as  a  baron  to  sit  in  Parliament ;  whereas  all 
Logan's  old  charters  are  from  the  sovereign. 

As  to  the  pretended  bond  of  man-rent  by  John  M'Dowall  of  Logan,  to  Uthred. 
M'Dowall  of  Garthland,  anno  1593,  mentioned  by  Nisbet,  Part  II.  page  283 
it  is  plainly  spurious,  null,  and  contrary  to  law,  and  the  nature  of  the  thing, 
and  so  no  legal  claim  can  be  founded  upon  it  :  For,  in  the  first  place,  it  wants  the 
ordinary  solemnities  requisite  at  the  time,  since  all  writs  of  importance  behoved  to 
be  sealed,  as  well  as  subscribed,  by  the  laws  then  in  force,  act  80.  Pari.  1579. 
Now  this  writ  is  not  sealed  at  all,  and  the  pretended  subscription  to  it  is  not  the- 
subscription  of  the  said  John  M'Dowall,  as  appears  by  comparing  it  with  his  other 
subscriptions  to  uncontroverted  writs.  Next,  such  bond  of  man-rent  were  against 
an  express  statute,  act  43.  Pari.  1555,  which  declares  all  such  bonds  null,  and 
discharges  the  granting  or  taking  the  same  in  all  time  coming,  under  severe  pe- 
nalties ;  so  that  it  cannot  be  presumed  such  bond  was  given  or  taken  ;  more  espe- 
cially, if  it  is  considered,  in  the  last  place,  that  such  bond  was  inconsistent  with 
the  circumstances  of  the  parties  at  the  time.  Garthland  held  several  lands  ward 
of  Logan,  and  was  thereby  liable  to  attendance  upon  Logan,  liis  superior,  at  head 
courts,  and  to  mihtary  services  inherent  to  such  holdings,  which  was  incompatible 
with  Logan's  performing  the  attendance  and  service,  mentioned  in  that  bond  to 
Garthland  his  vassal.  And  the  learned  Craig  informs  us,  that  the  services  due  by 
a  vassal  to  his  superior  are  expressed  with  us  by  man-rent  ;  and  the  duty  of  the 
superior  towards  his  vassal  by  that  of  maintenance  (Craig  de  Feudis,  lib.  1.  dieg.^ 
II.  sect.  1.)  ;  and  therefore  it  were  self-contradictory  that  such  bond  of  man-rent 
should  have  been  granted  by  Logan,  the  superior,  to  Garthland,  who  was  his  ward 
vassal  at  the  time  in  several  lands. 

And  further,  Logan's  using  supporters  before  tliis  writ,  plainly  shows  that 
Garthland  could  never  set  up  pretensions  of  chiefship  at  that  time.  And  it  is  more 
than  probable  the  first  of  the  name  of  M'Dowall  of  Garthland  was  a  younger  son 
of  M'Dowall  of  Logan,  and  that  he  got,  as  his  patrimony,  the  lands  of  Elrig,  &c. 
which  he  held  of  Logan  for  several  hundreds  of  years,  and  thereafter  resigned  them 
in  the  hands  of  Logan  his  superior,  ad  remanentiam ;  and  that  the  family  of  Garths 
land  first  had  the  name  of  M'Dowall,  by  his  marrrying  the  heiress  thereof,  being 
formerly  of  the  name  of  Garth,  which  Mr  Nisbet  observes.  Part  I.  page  29,  was 
an  ancient  family  in  Galloway. 

Mr  Richard  Hay,  the  Antiquarian,  states  the  question  upon  this  head  betwixt 
the  families  of  Logan,  and  Garthland ;  and  though  he  declines  giving  his  judg- 
ment, yet  it  is  plain  from  the  reasons  and  documents  set  forth  by  him,  that  Logan 
must  have  the  preference  ;  and  therefore  his  certificate  upon:  that  subject  is  here- 
to subjoined. 


APPENDIX. 


FOLLOWS    MR    RICHARD    HAV  S    CERTIFICATE. 


'-  I  MR  Richard  Hay,  Antiquarian,  by  these  presents  certify.  That  having  per- 
used several  old  writs  and  documents  belonging  to  the  Honourable  Laird  of  Lo- 
gan in  Galloway,  the  following  observations  occur  as  plain : 
"  imo.  That  the  lands  of  Logan,  constantly  designed  in  the  old  rights  Duminuin- 
de  Logan,  were  held  origmally  blench  of  the  crown  by  the  predecessors  of  the  pre- 
sent Laird  of  Logan,  as  is  clearly  demonstrated  by  a  charter  of  King  James  IV. 
to  Patrick  M-Dowall  of  Logan,  the  21st  of  January  1504. 

"  Ilia,  That  the  lands  of  Airick,  Myroch,  and  Balnagown,  still  designed  in  the 
said  writs,  jaccnt.  in  Doiiiinio  de  Logan,  and  are  a  live  merk  land,  long  before, 
the  year  1466,  were  held  by  Uthred  M'JJovvall  of  Garthland,  and  his  predeces- 
sors, of  Patrick  M'Dowall  of  Logan,  and  his  predecessors  in  warda  et  relievio 
reddendo;  inde  annuatim  ties  sectas  curia:  ad  tres  curias  capitales,  isc.  as  appears 
from  a  charter  of  contirmation  of  the  said  lands  to  Andrew  M'Dowall,  upon  the 
resignation  of  the  said  Uthred  M'Dowall  of  Garthland,  in  the  hands  of  the  said 
Patrick  M'Dowall  of  Logan  his  superior;  which  resignation  is  dated  at  Logan 
the  8th  of  December  1466,  as  also  from  a  precept  of  the  chancery,  anno, 
lino  Jacobi,  which  I  take  to  be  King  James  IV.  in  the  year  1488,  directed  tO' 
Patrick  M'Dowall  of  Logan,  superior,  for  infefting  Uthred  M'Dowall  of  Garth- 
land, in  the  said  lands  of  Airick,  &c. wherein  it  is  declared  that  the  said  Uthred' 
M'Dowall,  his  grandfather,  died  last  vest  and  seised  therein;  and  likewise  in  a- 
charter  of  Patrick  M'Dowall  of  Logan  to  Margaret  Kennedy,  daughter  to  Hugh 
Kennedy  of  Girvanmains,  for  her  liferent  as  Lady  Garthland,  dated  at  Wigton 
the  1st  of  March  1549.  From  all  which  it  is  evideut  that  Garthland's  pre- 
decessors got  these  lands  from  Logan's,  to  be  held  of  them  in  capite,  which) 
they  did  till  anno  1645,  ^^'^  they  sold  the  property  to  Logan  as  they  now  re- 
main. 

"  y,io.  That  the  Lairds  of  Logan  have  been  in  use  of  wearing  supporters  to  their 
arms,  whereof  1  have  seen  two  instances,  there  being  a  lion  supporting  their  es- 
cutcheon upon  their  seal,  anno  1549,  and  one  other  on  their  seal  1594,  the  other 
sides  being  defaced. 

"  Having  likewise  perused  several  old  writs  and  documents  belonging  to  the 
Honourable  Laird  of  Garthland,  amongst  which  a  charter  from  the  Douglasses, 
Lords  of  Galloway,  to  Garthland's  predecessor,  in  the  year  141 8 ;  as  also  a  bond  of 
man-rent  alleged  to  be  granted  by  John  M'Dowall  of  Logan  to  Uthred  M'Dowall 
of  Garthland,  together  with  all  the  arguments  adduced  by  the  said  two  honour- 
able gentlemen,  for  supporting  the  rights  and  prerogatives  of  their  two  respec- 
tive families,  I  think  it  difficult  to  judge,  nor  can  I  determine  which  of  the  two 
is  to  be  reputed  chief  and  head  of  the  M'Dowalls,  who  are  undoubtedly  the  re- 
presentatives of  the  old  Lords  of  Galloway,  until  such  time  as  clearer  docu- 
ments and  more  pregnant  reasons  be  offered  by  each  of  the  respective  parties. 
In  witness  whereof  I  have  subscribed  thir  presents  at  Edinburgh,  the  22d  of 
March  1722,  written  by  David  Tullideph,  apprentice  to  Mr  James  M'Euen, 
bookseller  in  Edinburgh,  before  these  witnesses,  Alexander  Nisbet,  Esq;  pro- 
fessor of  heraldry,  the  said  Mr  James  M'Euen,  and  the  said  David,  writer 
hereof." 

Mr  RICHARD  HAY. 

Ja.  M'Euen,  w'itness. 

David  Tullideph,  witness. 

Alexr.  Nisbet,  witness. 

Vol.  it.  5  K 


APPENDIX. 


KELSO  OF  THAT  Ilk  in  the  county  of  ayr. 


ALL  antiquaries  agree,  that  the  most  ancient  surnames  are  local  with  a  de  be- 
fore  them,  and  have  been  assumed  by  the  proprietors  when  fixed  appellations  be- 
came hereditary :  Thus  the  ancient  possessors  of  the  lands  of  Kelsoland,  in  the 
bailiary  of  Cunningham  and  sheriffdom  of  Ayr,  took  a  surname  from  their  own 
lands,  according  to  the  common  custom  of  others  amongst  us. 

But  that  the  antiquity  of  the  family  of  Kelso  may  not  be  asserted  without  a 
sufficient  document,  we  find  that  the  Kelsos  of  this  race  were  very  early  possessed 
of  these  lands  from  the  chartulary  of  the  abbacy  of  Paisley  («},  to  which  they 
were  benefactors. 

John  Kelso,  Dominus  de  Kelsoland,  as  he  is  designed,  flourished  under  King 
Robert  IL  the  first  of  our  kings  of  the  Stewartine  line,  who  came  to  the  throne 
in  tlie  year  1370  (i),  and  was  allied  by  marriage  with  a  lady  of  the  noble  family 
of  the  Livingstons  of  the  house  of  Callendar,  the  progenitors  of  the  Earls  of 
Linlithgow,  by  whom  he  had  a  son,  yobn  de  Kelso,  who  was  his  successor  in  his 
estate.  This  John  de  Kelso,  the  father,  "  Dominus  de  Kelsoland,  cum  confessu 
"  Joannis  de  Kelso,  filii  sui  et  haeredis  apparentis  et  Elizabethae  Livingston,  spousa; 
"  Joannis  senioris,"  gave,  "  Deo  et  ecclesie  sancti  Maria:  et  sancto  Jacobo  de  Pas- 
"  let,  terras  suas  de  Langlebank,  inter  terras  de  Kelsoland  et  Largs,  pro  salute  ani- 
"  marum  suarum  antecessorum  et  successorum  suorum  in  perpetuum  (<;}."  This 
moitification  bears  date  the  5th  of  January  anno  dom.  1403,  the  30th  year  of  the 
reign  of  King  Kobert  lU. 

This  last  John  was  succeeded  by  Thomas  Kelso  of  Kelsoland,  who  is  designed, 
in  a  charter  granted  by  King  James  IL  the  fourth  day  of  September  1444,  under 
the  Privy  Seal,  "  Loco  magni  sigilli,  tanquam  senescallum  Scotias  Thoma?  de  Kelsa 
"  de  Kelsoland,  nepoti  et  haeredi  quondam  Joannis  de  Kelso  de  Kelsoland,"  upon 
his  own  resignation  (d).  This  Thomas  Kelso  of  Kelsoland  was  aUied  by  marriage 
with  the  ancient  family  of  the  Boyles  of  Kelburn,  progenitor  of  the  present  Earl  of 
Glasgow;  which  family  at  the  same  time  intermarried,  and  made  a  double  alliance 
with  the  family  of  Kelsoland.     He  was  succeeded  by 

John  Kelso  of  Kelsoland  his  son,  who,  I  think,  was  allied  by  marriage  with 
the  Stewarts  of  Fynock,  who  was  a  brother  of  the  House  of  Bute  {/),  and  had 

Thomas  Kelso  of  Kelsoland  his  son,  who  has  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal  of 
King  James  V.  as  Prince  and  Steward  of  Scotland,  wherein  he  is  designed  7z//ofj; 
haeredi  'joannis  de  Kelso  de  Kelsoland.  This  charter  is  dated  in  the  year  of  our  Lord 
1521  (/).  It  does  not  appear  to  me  when  this  gentleman  married,  but  he  left  a 
son  to  succeed  him,  viz. 

Thomas  Kelso  of  Kelsoland,  who  was  infeft  in  his  estate,  and  heir  to  his  father, 
the  loth  of  November  1536  (^).  He  married  Jean  Eraser  or  Frissel,  a  daughter 
of  the  ancient  family  of  the  Frissels  of  Knock  in  the  shire  of  Ayr,  and  left  issue, 
Archibald,  his  son  and  successor,  and  a  daughter  Giles,  who  was  married  to  Hugh 
Crawfurd  of  Cloverhill,  and  had  issue. 

Archibald  Kelso  of  Kelsoland,  son  and  heir  of  Thomas  Kelso  of  Kelsoland, 
was  infeft  as  heir  to  his  father  the  loth  of  November  1567  (/j).  He  married 
Margaret  Stewart,  daughter  of  James  Stewart  of  Ardgowan  and  Blackhall,  by 
Janet  his  wife,  daughter  of  George  Maxwell  of  Newark,  by  whom  he  had  David 
'his  successor,  and  a  daughter  married  to  John  Stewart  of  Ascog,  and  had  issue. 

David  Kelso  of  Kelsoland  was  infeft  in  the  lands  of  Kelsoland,  as  heir  to  his 
father,  the  2d  of  November  1601  (z).  He  had  Archibald  his  eldest  son,  who  mar- 
ried Sarah  Brisbane,  daughter  of  Matthew  Brisbane  of  Roslin,  but  had  no  issue ; 

(o)  The  chartulary  or  register  of  the  abbacy  of  Paisley,  now  in  the  custody  of  the  Right  Honourable 
the  Earl  of  Dundonald.  {b)  Buchanan,  Boethius,  Lesley,  and  our  other  historians.  (f)  Chartulary  of 
the  abbacy  of  Paisley  before  cited,  from  whence  the  author  of  this  memorial  drew  this  note.  (d)  Sign- 
ed inventory  of  the  writs  and  charters  of  the  lands  of  Kelsoland,  which  the  author  has  in  his  hands. 
{/)  Charta  in  publicis  Archivis,  ad  annum  1445.  (/)  Signed  inventory  of  the  writs  of  Kelsoland,  in 
the  hands  of  the  author  of  this  memorial,     (f)  Ibidem,     (h)  Ibidem.     (;)  Ibidem. 


APPENDIX.  10.^ 

she  was  afterwards  married  to  Sir  William.  Mure  of  Rowallan.  He  was  succeed- 
ed by 

Robert  Kelso  of  Kelsoland,  who  was  infeft  in  the  estate  of  Kelsoland  in  the 
year  1613  (1^).  This  gendeman  having  no  issue  of  his  body,  sold  his  estate,  in  the 
year  of  God  1624,  to  Patrick  Shaw,  second  son  to  John  Shaw  of  Greenock.  He  mar- 
ried Jean  Montgomery,  daughter  of  Adam  Montgomery  of  Broadston,  and  sister  to 
Hugh  Lord  Viscount  Montgomery  of  Airds,  of  the  kingdom  of  Ireland  ;  but  he 
dying  without  issue,  was  succeeded  by  his  nephew  Hugh  Shaw  of  Kelsoland,  who 
sold  the  lands  of  Kelsoland  to  the  heir-male  of  the   House   of  Kelsoland,   Robert 

Kelso  of  Halrig,  anno   1632  (/).     He   married Osburn,   daughter  of  John 

Osburn,  Provost  of  Ayr,  and  had  John  Kelso,  late  Surveyor  of  the  Customs  at 
Port-Glasgow,  and  William  Kelso  of  Dalkeith,  Writer  to  the  Signet,  who  mar- 
ried Mary,  daughter  of  John  Dunlop  of  that  Ilk,  by  Antonia  his  wife,  daughter 
and  sole  heir  of  Sir  John  Brown  of  Fordel,  and  has  William  Kelso  of  Dalkeith 
his  son  and  heir,  who  carries  the  coat  of  arms  of  the  ancient  family  of  the  Kelsos 
of  Kelsoland,  of  which  he  is  undoubtedly  the  heir-male  and  representative. 


ACCOWE    OF    THE    PEDIGREE    AN'D    DESCENT    OF    WILLL\M    COPL-\ND    CI-' 

Colli  ESTON. 


TO  clear  which,  it  is  fit  to  relate  the  circumstances  that  the  kingdom  of  Scot- 
land was  in  with  her  neighbouring  nations  of  France  and  England,  as  follows : 

Edward  III.  King  of  England,  pretending  right  to  the  crown  of  France,  he,  in 
prosecution  of  the  same,  sent  over  an  army  into  France,  where  his  valiant  son 
prince  Edward,  commonly  called  the  Black  Prince,  gave  the  Frencli  a  great 
overthrow  at  the  battle  of  Cressy.  Thereafter,  anno  1346,  King  Edward  sat  down 
before  Calais  with  a  strong  army  and  besieged  it ;  to  divert  whom,  Philip  King 
of  France,  knowing  the  city  to  be  of  great  importance,  sent  his  ambassadors  to 
Scotland,  to  persuade  King  David  in  performance  of  the  old  league  and  alliance 
that  was  betwixt  France  and  Scotland,  to  denounce  war  against  England  ;  to 
which  King  David  too  easily  consented,  and,  by  his  proclamation,  ordered  all  his 
subjects  who  were  fit  to  bear  arms,  betwixt  sixty  and  sixteen  years  of  age,  to 
attend  his  host,  out  of  whom  he  raised  an  army  of  sixty  thousand  men,  in  which 
army  there  were  two  thousand  men  at  arms  of  noblemen  and  'gentlemen  ;  and 
upon  the  6th  of  October  1346,  King  David  with  that  army  entered  Northum- 
berland, burning  and  destroying  all  before  him.  Upon  which  Q_Lieen  Philippa, 
wife  to  King  Edward  III.  came  down  to  tlie  North  of  England,  and  caused 
Percy  Earl  of  Northumberland,  who  was  then  English  Governor  and  Warden  of 
the  East  Borders,  (with  the  assistance  of  the  bishops  of  York  and  Durham,  and  all 
the  English  noblemen  in  the  North  of  England)  gather  together  all  the  forces  he 
could  to  join  these  forces  she  had  brought  down  with  her,  and  which  her  hus- 
band King  Edward  had  sent  her  over  from  the  siege  of  Calais,  where  he  still 
continued  :  and  the  English  and  Scots  armies  meeting,  they  fought  a  cruel  battle 
at  Neville's  Cross,  near  to  Durham,  upon  St  Luke's  day,  being  the  i8th  of  Octo- 
ber, and  year  foresaid,  where  the  Scots  army  received  a  lamentable  overthrow, 
the  greatest  part  of  the  nobility  and  gentry  being  either  slain  or  taken  prisoners  j- 
King  David  himself  fighting  vahantly,  was  taken  prisoner  by  John  Copland,  Esq. 
in  Northumberla'id,  who,  before  he  could  take  and  disarm  the  king,  had  two  of 
his  teeth  struck  out  by  the  king's  gauntlet.  Immediately  after  tlie  battle,  John 
Copland  conveyed  Mng  David  to  his  castle  of  Ogle;  and  being  ordered  by  Queen 
Philippa  to  deliver  up  his  royal  prisoner  to  her,  he  absolutely  refused  it,  and  sent 

(i)  Signed  inventory  of  the  writs  of  Kelsol.ind,  in  the  hands  of  the  author  tf  this  memorial. 
(/)  Ibidem.  The  inventory  of  the  writs  oat  of  which  this  account  is  drawn,  anil  were  in  the  163S- 
given  up  to  Pvobert  Kelso  of  Halrig, 


104  APPENDIX. 

her  a  very  resolute  answer,  to  wit,  "  That  as  for  the  King  of  Scots  he  would  b& 
"  answerable  for  his  safe  keeping,  but  would  deliver  him  to  no  body  except  to  his' 
"  Sovereign  Lord  the  King,  or  his  express  orders."  Whereupon  Q_iieen  Philippa 
complained  to  King  Edward  who  was  lying  then  before  Calais.  John  Copland 
being  commanded  to  repair  thither  by  King  Edward,  gave  such  a  modest  and 
loyal  answer  to  the  complaint  given  in  against  him,  that  King  Edward  ordered 
L.50G  Sterling  a-year  to  be  settled  on  him  and  his  heirs  for  ever;  and  until  the 
grant  of  land  was  settled  on  him  and  his  heirs,  he  had  L.  500  yearly  paid  him 
oat  of  the  customs  of  London,  and  those  of  Berwick-upon-Tweed;  and  it  appears 
upon  record,  that  John  Copland  was  then  made  a  knight  banneret  Stow's  Chro- 
nology, page  243.  Sir  John  Copland  being  returned  mto  England,  and  being  or- 
dered to  deliver  up  his  royal  prisoner  to  the  Qiieen,  who  was  then  at  York,  he 
guarded  him  thither  from  his  own  castle  of  Ogle  with  twenty  thousand  men,  con- 
bistirig  of  his  friends,  tenants,  and  the  militia  of  the  Northern  shires,  and  de- 
livered King  David  up  to  the  Queen,  and  at  the  same  time  made  his  excuse  be- 
fore her  and  the  council  in  so  dutiful  and  discreet  a  manner,  that  they  were  all 
very  well  satisfied  with  his  conduct  in  that  affair.  Sir  John  Copland  shortly  after- 
wards had  several  lands  assigned  him  near  to  VVooler  in  Northumberland,  which 
do  bear  his  surname  to  this  day,  and  got  likewise  lands  in  Cumberland  near  to 
Keswick,  where  are  the  Copland  Fells,  and  the  Copland  Isles,  and  lands  about 
Donnghadee  in  Ireland.  King  David  continued  prisoner  in  England  for  the  space 
of  ekven  years,  until  he  was  ransomed  for  one  hundred  thousand  merks.  Sterling;, 
and,  in  the  mean  time,  tlie  English  overran  and  possessed  themselves  of  the  coun- 
tries of  Merse,  Teviotdale,  Lauderdale,  Ettrick  Forest, Tweeddale.Eskdale.Nithsdale, 
Annandale,  and  Galloway,  the  length  of  Cockburnspath  and  Soutrahills  on  the  east, 
and,  on  the  west,  the  length  of  the  head  of  Clyde  ;  and  the  English  at  that  time 
strongly  garrisoned  almost  all  the  fortresses  in  Scotland,  esiiecially  Roxburgh  and 
Hermitage. 

Copland  of  Collieston,  being  descended  from  Sir  John  Copland,  bears  for  his 
arms,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  quarters,  guiles,  thi-ee  mullets  or  ;  second  and 
tiiird,  argent,  a  shak^fork  j-aZ>/if ;  crest,  a  horseman  in  armour  brandishing  a  sword: 
motto,  Vici.  Which  arms  have  been  so  borne  by  him  and  his  predecessors  of  a 
long  time. 

The  above  memorial  is  vouched  by  Hector  Boethius,  and  Buchanan's  History  of 
the  Kings  of  Scotland,  and  by  Tyrrell,  Echard,  Baker,  and  Drake,  and  other  his- 
torians of  those  times. 


BORTHWICK  Lord  Borthwick. 


THE  first  of  this  ancient  and  noble  family  came  from  Hungary  to  Scotland,  in 
the  retinue  of  Queen  Margaret,  in  the  reign  of  Malcolm  Canmore,  anno  Domini 
1057. 

Thomas  de  Borthwick  is  mentioned  in  a  charter  of  Robert  Lauder  of  Quar- 
relwood,  in  the  reign  of  King  Alexander  II. 

In  the  reign  of  Robert  III.  Sir  William  Borthwick.  got  the  lands  of  Catkune, 
which  he  called  after  his  own  name  Borthwick.  Sir  IVilUam  de  Borthwick  ob- 
tained a  charter  from  Robert  Duke  of  Albany,  upon  a  resignation  of  Walter  Scott,  of 
the  landsof  Toftcoat  in  the  shire  of  Selkirk.  (Had.  Collect.)  Sir  Wilham  Borthwick 
deeodem,  miles,  got  a  charter  from  King  James  I.  1430,  of  the  Lands  of  Borthwick, 
with  a  licence  to  build  a  castle,  as  the  charter  bears,  "  ad  construendam  arcem  in 
"  illo  loco  qui  vulgariter  dicitur  le  Motte  de  Loquharrat  intra  vicecomitatem  de 
"  Edinburgh."  (Had.  Collect,  p.  76.)  He  built  the  castle  of  Borthwick  after  the 
Hungarian  form,  in  remembrance  of  his  origin,  and  it  is  an  extraordinary  building:  the 
walls  thereof  being  so  thick  as  to  admit  a  room  to  be  taken  out  of  the  thickness. 
I 


APPENDIX.  J.05 

The  hall  is  so  large  and  high  of  the  roof  that  a  man  oil  horseback  may  turn  a 
spear  in  it  with  all  the  ease  imaginable.  There  is,  in  the  burial  place  of  the 
family,  two  fine  large  statues  of  marble  of  one  of  the  lords  of  Borthwick  and  his 
lady,  with  smaller  statues  of  their  children. 

This  family  was  dignified  with  the  title  of  Lord  Borthwick  in  the  beginning  of 
the  reign  of  King  James  11.  as  appears  by  a  charter  from  the  said  king,  dated  Ja- 
nuary 8.  1458,  registered  in  the  records  of  Parliament.  The  tenor  whereof  fol- 
lows. 

"  JACOBUS,  Dei  Gratia,  Rex  Scotorum,  omnibus  probis  hominibus  totius  terras 
*'  suae,  clericis  et  laicis,  salutem.  Sciatis  nos  dedisse,  concessisse,  et  ha?c  present! 
"  carta  nostra  confirmasse,  dilecto  consanguineo  nostro  Willielmo  Domino  Bortii- 
"  wick,  omnes  et  singulas,  terras  de  Glenegle,  cum  pertinentibus,  jacentes  infra 
"  vicecomitatem  de  Berwick  ;  quajquidem  terrae,  cum  pertinentibus,  fuerunt  di- 
"  lects  nostrs  Mariotse  de  Pringle  haereditaria3,  et  quas  eadem  Mariota,  noa  vi 
"  aut  metu  ducta,  nee  errore  lapsa,  sed  sua  mera  et  spontanea  voluntate,  in  sua 
*'  pura  viduitate,  in  manus  nostras,  apud  monasterium  sanctae  crucis  de  Edin- 
"  burgh,  per  fustum  et  baculum  sursum,  redidit,  pureque,  simplicter  resignavit,  ac 
"  totum  jus  et  clameum,  que  in  dictis  terris  cum  petinentibus,  habuit,  seu  habere 
"  potuit,  pro  se  et  hasredibus  suis,  omnino  quiete  clamavit,  in  perpetuum,  tenend. 
"  et  habend.  dictas  terras  de  Glenegle  cum  pertinentibus,  predicto  Willielmo 
"  Domino  de  Borthwick,  et  haeredibus  suis,  de  nobis,  hasredibus  et  successoribus 
♦'  nostris,  in  feodo  et  hsreditate,  in  perpetuum,  per  omnes  rectas  metas  suas  anti- 
"  quas  et  devisas,  prout  jacentes  in  longitudine  et  latitudine,  cum  omnibus  et  sin- 
"  gulis  libertatibus,  commoditatibus,  et  asiamentis,  ac  justis  pertinentibus  suis 
"  quibuscunque,  tam  non  nominatis,  quam  nominatis,  ad  dictas  terras,  cum  per- 
"  tinentibus  spectantibus,  seu  quovis  modo  juste  spectare  valentibus,  in  futurum, 
"  et  adeo  libere,  quiete,  plenarie,  integre,  honorifice,  bene,  et  in  pace,  in  omnibus 
"  et  per  omnia,  sicut  dicta  Mariota,  aut  predecessores  sui,  praedictas  terras,  cum 
"  pertinentibus  de  nobis,  aut  predecessoribus  nostris,  ante  dictam  resignationem 
"  nobis  inde  factam,  liberius  tenuit  seu  possidet,  tenuerunt  seu  possiderunt,  faci- 
"  endo  inde  annatim  dictus  Willielmus  et  haeredes  sui  nobis,  haeredibus  et  succes- 
"  soribus  nostris,  servitia  de  dictis  terris  debita  et  consueta  :  In  cujus  rei  testimo- 
"  nium,  presenti  cartse  nostroe,  magnum  sigillum  nostrum  apponi  prscipimus. 
"  Testibus  reverendis  in  Christo  patribus  Georgio  episcopo  Brehinen.  cancellario 
"  nostro,  Thoma  episcopo  Gandidaecasie  nostri  secreti  sigilli  custode,  dilectis  con- 
"  sanguineis  nostris  Jacobo  Domino  Livingston  Magno  Camerario  nostro,  Thoma 
"  Domino  Erskin,  Patricio  Domino  le  Graham,  Willielmo  de  Moravia  de  TuUi- 
"  harden,  et  Magistro  Joanne  Arrois,  Archediacano  Glasguen.  Secretario  nostro. 
"  Apud  Edinburgh,  octavo  die  mensis  Januarii,  anno  Domino  millesimo  quad- 
"  ringentesimo  quinquagesimo  octavo,  et  regni  nostri  vicesimo  secundo." 


The  Lord  Borthwick,  in  the  Parliament  1469,  holden  at  Edinburgh  by  King 
James  III.  present,  is  ranked  before  the  Lord  Abernethy,  and  after  the  Lord  Hali- 
burton.  In  the  Parliament  1471,  he  is  the  fourth  lord  of  Parliament  ranked  im- 
mediately before  the  Lord  Glammis. 

The  following  charters  are  to  be  found  in  the  Records  of  Parliament. 

Charter  of  apprising  William  Lord  Borthwick  of  the  lands  of  Lochwarret. 
[2d  Charter  King  James  III.  id  Book,  No.  34.] 

Charter  William  Lord  Borthwick  of  the  lands  and  moat  of  Lochwarret,  Mid- 
dleton,  and  Buteland,  lands  of  Borthwick,  Legerwood,  and  Heriotmuir.  [3d 
Charter  King  James  V.  28th  Book,  No.  157.] 

Charter  of  confirmation  John  Lord  Borthwick  of  the  lands  of  Cublavv,  Over- 
Lugats,  Nether-Lugats,  Gilraerton,  Over-Shiels,  and  Nether-Shiels.  [4th  Charter 
by  Queen  Mary.  30th  Book,  No.  226.] 

Charter  of  confirmation  William  Lord  Borthwick  of  the  lands,  lordship,  and 
barony  of  Borthwick,  the  moat  of  Lochwarret,  lands  of  Middleton,  Heriot,  and 
Heriotmuir.     [5th  Charter  by  King  James  VI.  33d  Book,  No.  ^^.'] 

Vol.  11.  5  L 


io6  APPENDIX. 

Charter  John  Lord  Boithwick  of  the  lands  and  barony  of  Heriotmuii, 
and  Kirk-lands  of  Lochwarret.  [6j:h  Charter  by  King  James  VI.  46th  Book, 
No.  359.] 

Charter  John  Lord  Borthwick  of  the  lands  and  barony  of  Heriotmuir.  [7th 
Charter  by  King  Charles  L  57th  Book,  No.  338.]. 

The  family  of  Borthwick  formerly  possessed  a  very  great  estate,  besides  a  great 
many  superiorities  of  lands,  besides  whole  closes  in  several  of  the  largest  towns  in 
Scotland  ;  as  for  instance,  in  Edinburgh,  Borthwick's  Close  belonged  to  the  Lord 
Borthwick,  whose  family  has  been  very  great  in  former  times;  but  I  cannot  here 
be  particular  about  what  offices  or  employments  the  lords  of  this  name  did  bear 
under  the  different  reigns  to  which  they  were  cotemporary,  not  having  seen  any 
of  the  original  writs  of  the  family.  But  it  appears  by  the  honours  on  the  es- 
cutcheon in  the  burial-place  of  this  noble  family,  that  it  has  been  very  illustrious 
in  its  alliances.  The  last  lord  of  this  name,  John  Lord  Borthwick,  was  married  to 
Lady  Elizabeth  Ker,  a  daughter  of  the  Marquis  of  Lothian ;.  he  died  soon  after 
the  Restoration. 

William  Lord  Borthwick,  as  superior  of  the  lands  of  Nenthorn  in  the  shire  of 
Berwick,  grants  a  charter  to  his  second  son,  Alexander  Borthwick,  upon  the  resig- 
nation of  James  Wilson  ;  which  instrument  of  resignation  is  dated  June  the  27th 
1495 ;  but  the  charter  is  so  much  torn  that  the  sense  of  it  cannot  be  well  con- 
nected ;  and  in  the  instrument  of  resignation  of  the  said  lands  are  these  words : 
"  Super  quibus  omnibus  et  singulis  Alexander  Borthwick,  filius  dicti  Wilielmi 
"  Domini  Bprthwick,  a  me  notario  publico  sibi  fieri  petiit  hoe  presens  public. 
**  insti  umentum,  acta  erant  hsc  infra  burgum  de  Edinburgh,  in  hospitio  dicti 
♦'  Domini  Borthwick,  hora  quarta  post  meridiem,  vel  eo  circa,  sub  anno  die  mense 
"  indictione  et  pontificat.  Supra  presentibus  ibidem  Alexandro  Borthwick  fratre 
"  dicti  Domini  Borthwick,  magistro  Thoma  Greenlaw  vicario  de  Arth,  cum  di- 
"  versis  aliis  testibus,"  &c. 

John  Lord  Borthwick,  son  of  William  Lord  Borthwick,  grants  sasine  of  the 
lands  of  Scholle  and  Compasslack  to  William  Borthwick  of  Soltray,  son  of  Wil- 
liam Borthwick  of  Soltray,  his  cousin-german,  son  of  the  said  Alexander  Borth- 
wick of  Nenthorn  ;  which  sasine  is  dated  May  the  20th  1550,  and  is  to  this  purpose : 
"  Nobilis  et  potens  Dominus  Joannes  Dominus  Borthwick,  ad  instantiam  honora- 
"  bilis  viri  Wilielmi  Borthwick  de  Soltra,  filii  et  haeredis  quondam  Wilielmi  Borth- 
♦'  wick  de  Soltra  sui  patris,  ad  omnes  et  singulas  terras  de  Scholia  et  Compasslac, 
'•  cum  suis  pertinentibus,  jacentes  in  dominio  de  Waddaill,  et  vicecomitatu  de 
"  Edinburgh,  et  ibidem  prefatus  Wihelmus  Borthwick,  quoddam  prsceptum  sa- 
"  sinse  dicti  Domini,  ut  supra  subiens  sigillo  pergameno  scriptum,  &c.  Joannes 
"  Dominus  Borthwick  et  Dominus  superior  terrarum  subscriptarum,  &-c.  quia 
"  mihi  clare  constat  per  authentica  documenta,  quod  quondam  delectus  meus 
"  consanguineus  Wihelmus  Borthwick  de  Soltra,  pater  Wilielmi  Borthwick  laterii 
"  presentium,  &-c."  The  said  William  Borthwick  redeems  his  lands  of  Nenthorn, 
that  were  wadset  to  Helen  Heriot,  daughter  of  James  Heriot  of  Trabrown,  as 
appears  by  the  instrument  of  renunciation,  dated  May  7.  1582,  in  favour  of  the 
said  WiUiam  Borthwick,  who  had  several  sons ;  the  eldest,  whose  name  was  Wil- 
liam, designed  of  Johnstonburn,  was  a  colonel  in  the  Swedish  servi&e  under  Gusta- 
vus  Adolphus  ;  the  second,  whose  name  was  Alexander,  was  factor  for  his  brother 
during  his  absence  abroad  in  Sweden.  Major  William  Borthwick,  eldest  and  only 
son  of  the  said  Colonel  William  Borthwick,  raised  a  company  of  men  in  defence 
of  his  Majesty  King  Charles  L  The  said  Major  Borthwick  had  several  sons,  the 
eldest  of  whom  was  Colonel  WilHam  Borthwick  of  Johnstonburn,  who  changed 
his  own  regiment,  under  British  pay,  for  a  Dutch  regiment,  with  the  present  EarL 
of  Stairs,  then  Lord  Dalrymple,  and  was  unforunately  killed  at  the  battle  of  Ra- 
millies ;  he  died,  and  all  his  brothers,  without  issue. 

Alexander  Borthwick.  in  Johnstonburn,  second  son  of  William  Borthwick  of 
Soltray,  had  several  sons,  the  eldest  whereof  was  William  Borthwick  of  Mayshiels 
or  Pilmuir,  who  married  a  daughter  of  Mr  Henry  Stewart,  advocate,  a  younger  son 
of  the  family  of  GrandtuUy,  by  whom  he  had  Captain  Henry  Borthwick  of  Pil- 
muir, whose  son,  Henry  Borthwick  of  Mayshiels,  is  the  nearest  heir-male  and  re- 
presentative of  the  family  of  the  Lord  Borthwick. 


APPENDIX.  ro7 

John  Borthwick.  of  Newbyres,  descended  from  the  Lord  Borthwick,  married 
Margaret  Borthwick,  one  of  the  daughters  of  Johnstonburn,  who  had  two  sons  to 
him,  to  wit,  James  and  John  Borthwicks;  the  said  James  Borthwick,  one  of  the 
sons  of  Newbyres,  married  a  daughter  of  Murray  of  Blackbarony,  who  had  to  him 
a  daughter  called  Elizabeth,  who  was  married  to  the  Earl  of  Haddington  and 
Melrose,  and  had  to  the  said  Earl  two  daughters  ;  the  eldest  was  married  to  Lord 
Lindsay  in  Fife,  and  had  to  him  John  Lindsay  Earl  of  Crawford,  Lord  Treasurer 
of  Scotland,  and  a  danghter  who  was  married  to  Scot  of  Ardrose  ;  and,  after  the 
death  of  the  said  Lord,  she  married  my  Lord  Boyd,  and  had  to  him  one  son  and 
six  daughters ;  the  son  was  married  to  a  daughter  of  the  House  of  Wigton,  but 
died  without  children;  the  eldest  of  the  six  daughters  was  married  to  Morison  of 
Prestongrange,  the  second  was  married  to  Sinclair  of  Stevenston,  the  third  was 
married  to  Dundas  of  Arniston,  the  fourth  was  married  to  Sir  William  Scott  of 
Martin,  the  fifth  married  to  Morison  of  Dairsie,  and  the  sixth  daughter  died 
unmarried.  The  foresaid  second  daughter,  procreate  betwixt  the  foresaid  Earl  of 
Haddington  and  Ehzabeth  Borthwick  his  lady,  was  married  to  the  Lord  Ogilvie, 
no.v  EarLof  Airly,  and  had  three  sons,  and  one  daughter,  who  was  married  to 
Urquhart  of  Meldrum. 

The  Lord  Borthwick  bears  co-gent,  three  cinquefoils  sable,  supported  by 
two  angels,  winged  or  ;  crest,  a  negro's  head  couped  :  motto,  ^n  conducit. 

Borthwick.  of  Mayshiels,  as  descended  of  my  Lord  Borthwick,  the  same  as 
he,  but  charges  the  shield  with  a  heart  proper ;  crest,  an  eagle  essorant,  proper  :^ 
m.otto.  Nee  deerit  operi  dextra;  as  in  the  Lyon  Register  1673. 


ERASER  Lord  Lovat. 


SOME  antiquaries  of  no  small  name  assert,  that  the  noble  family  of  the  Era- 
sers are  of  a  French  origin ;  others  again  say,  that  they  are  one  of  our  great  Scots 
families  that  assumed  the  surname  of  Fraser  from  the  figures  in  their  arms,  the 
fiases,  when  surnames  began  to  be  hereditarily  fixed  amongst  us  :  Be  this  as  it 
will,  it  is  plain  fro4n  authentic  vouchers,  that  are  still  preserved,  that,  in  the  reign 
of  King  Malcolm  IV.  they  are  passest  of  many  lands  in  the  south,  in  the  county 
of  Tweeddale  and  elsewhere,  and  were  high  sheriffs  of  the  shire  of  Peebles,  then 
designed  vicecomes  de  Traquoqueir.  In  the  time  of  King  Alexander  II.  they 
are  then  spread  into  many  numerous-  and  noble  branches  ;  Sir  Simon  Fraser 
was  the  liead  of  the  family ;  one  of  his  younger  brothers  was  the  celebrated  Bishop 
Fraser  of  St  Andrews,  who  was  one  of  the  Lords  of  the  Regerycy  of  Scotland,  after 
the  death  of  King  Alexander  III.  and  another  was  Sir  Andrew  Fraser,  High  Sheriff 
of  the  county  of  Stirling,  so  much  celebrated  in  the  history  of  those  times.  This 
Sir  Simon  Fraser,  Lord  of  Oliver  Castle,  the  father,  and  Sir  Simon  the  younger, 
his  son,  are  both  mentioned  amongst  the  magnates  ScoticE  in  the  Feedera  Anglite, 
in  the  great  transactions  of  settling  the  crown  after  the  death  of  the  young  queen, 
called  the  Maid  of  Norway,  1292.  They  were  both  noble  patriots,  and  we  may 
venture  to  say  the  son  surpassed  all  others  in  his  time,  for  valour,  magnanimity, 
and  true  fortitude  ;  our  historians  mention,  that,  but  with  a  handful  of  brave  reso- 
lute Scotsmen,  he  defeated  three  several  bodies  of  the  English,  far  surpassing  him  in 
number,  in  different  battles,  in  one  day  at  Roslin  muir  near  Edinburgh,  for  which 
they  extol  him  to  the  very  skies,  as  the  greatest  patriot  of  his  country,  next  to 
the  famous  Sir  William  Wallace  the  Viceroy  ;  and  indeed  he  had  the  same  fate 
with  Sir  William  ;  for,  in  the  course  of  the  war,  falhng  into  the  enemies'  hands; 
he  was,  by  order  of  King  Edward  I.  sent  prisoner  to  London,  where  he  was  execut- 
ed as  a  traitor,  in  the  very  same  manner  that  Sir  William  Wallace,  his  faithful 
Achates^  was,  for  no  other  crime,  but  resolutely  persisting  in  the  defence  of  the 
hberties  and  independency  of  his  country,  when  they  were  so  eminently  invaded 
by  our  powerful  neighbours  on  the  other  side  of  the  Tweed.     This  gallant  hero 


loS  APPENDIX. 

left  behind  liim  a  son, .  who  was  taken  prisoner  by  the  English  with  his  father,  but 
being  too  young  to  have  been  concerned  in  the  war,  his  life  was  spared ;  but,  to 
put  him  out  of  the  way,  and  to  do  all  they  could  to  extinguish  the  memory  of 
his  glorious  father,  they  sent  him  over  to  France,  where  he  fought  in  behalf  of  the 
English,  and  being  long  unheard  of,  and  supposed  dead,  his  two  sisters  shared  their 
father's  great  estate  betwixt  them,  being  married  into  the  families  of  Biggar  and 
Yester,  v^hich  gave  occasion  to  the  Marquis  of  Tweeddale  and  the  earl  of  Wigton 
to  quarter  the  coat  of  arms  of  the  Erasers  in  their  acliievements  to  this  time.  At 
length  Sir  Simon  Fraser  liearing  of  the  great  merit  and  good  success  of  King  Ro- 
bert the  Bruce,  he  found  means  to  disengage  himself  from  the  English  service  in 
France,  and  came  over  to  Scotland,  and  joined  the  loyal  party,  to  whom  he  could 
not  fail  to  be  most  acceptable,  for  the  memory  and  merit  of  his  father.  Now  it 
was  he  claimed  his  estate,  which,  as  has  been  said,  was  divided  betwixt  his  two 
sisters  on  the  supposition  that  he  had  been  long  dead.  But  it  seems  Sir  Patrick 
Fleming  and  Sir  Hugh  Hay  being  unwiUing  to  part  with  so  great  an  estate,  which 
they  had  so  long  possessed,  and  thought  their  own,  and  the  king  as  unwilhng  to  dis- 
oblige two  men  who  had  such  a  stock  of  merit  with  their  sovereign.  Sir  Simon 
Fraser,  that  he  might  be  no  occasion  of  embroihng  the  government,  that  was  not 
very  firmly  established,  did  so  far  prefer  the  peace  of  his  country  to  his  own  in- 
terest, that  he  acquiesced,  and  left  his  estate  in  the  hands  of  his  brothers-in-law. 
However,  the  gracious  king,  to  make  him  all  the  amends  he  well  could,  in  lieu  of  his 
estate  in  the  south,  gave  him  the  lands  and  barony  of  Kinnell  in  Forfarshire,  and 
many  others  in  Inverness-shire,  which  had  mostly  been  in  the  crown  ever  since 
the  forfeiture  of  Sir  John  Bisset,  for  being  alleged  accessory  to  the  murdering  of 
the  Earl  of  Athol  in  the  1244,  Scotichron.  King  Robert  I.  likewise  married 
him  to  his  niece,  a  daughter  of  William  Earl  of  Ross,  by  Lady  Matilda  Bruce  his 
sister,  and  gave  him  the  three  crowns,  arms  of  concession,  as  a  mark  of  his  alliance 
with  the  royal  family  ;  so  that  the  three  crowns  were  never  the  Bissets'  arms,  as  is 
ignorantly  pretended  by  those  who  would  set  up  a  female  succession  in  the  family 
of  Lovat.  This  Sir  Simon  Fraser,  ever  after  this,  commonly  called  the  Knight  of 
Kinnell,  was  little  inferior  to  his  father  for  valour  and  loyalty  ;  he  stuck  firm  to 
King  Robert  all  his  life  long,  and  was  no  less  eminent  and  conspicuous  in  his  l6y- 
alty  to  his  son  King  David  II.  For,  on  the  breaking  out  of  the  war  in  the  young 
king's  minority,  on  the  invasion  of  Baliol,  he,  with  other  patriots,  took  the  field 
in  defence  of  their  rightful  sovereign,  and  fought  with  great  valour  at  the  battle 
of  Duplin.  He  had  also  a  great  hand  in  taking  and  sacking  the  town  of  Perth, 
which  was  then  in  the  enemies'  hands,  but  had  the  misfortune  to  lose  his  life  the 
year  thereafter  in  the  fatal  battle  of  Halidonhill,  in  the  year  1333,  as  Buchanan 
says.  This  noble  person  left  behind  him  a  son  named  Hugh,  who,  by  the  bounty 
of  King  David,  when  he  came  to  reward  the  sons  of  those  who  had  lost  their  lives 
in  his  service,  had  the  barony  of  Lovat  ;  for,  by  this  title,  Hugo  Fraser  Dominus 
lie  Lovat  does  homage  to  the  Bishop  of  Murray  for  a  fishing  in  the  river  of  Forn, 
which  he  held  of  that  See,  anno  1367.  But  there  is  no  voucher  that  he  married 
any  heir-female  of  the  Bissets :  For,  in  the  reign  of  Alexander  III.  Sir  David  de 
Graham,  and  Patrick  Graham  his  son,  have  then  the  lands  of  Lovat,  and  not  the 
Bissets,  who  were,  as  all  our  historians  agree,  expelled  the  country  long  before 
this  time  ;  so  we  see  how  vain  and  groundless  an  imagination  it  is  to  place  a  female 
succession  of  the  Bissets  in  this  noble  family,  as  a  precedent  forsooth  to  divert  the 
succession  out  of  the  channel  of  heirs-male  in  the  House  of  Lovat,  in  which  it  did 
ever  run,  to  estabhsh  the  succession  to  the  honours  in  an  heir  of  line ;  but  of  this 
enough  in  a  memorial  of  this  kind.  He  married  Isabel,  daughter  of  Wemyss  of 
that  Ilk,  by  whom  he  had  his  son  and  heir  Hugh  Fraser  Dominus  de  Lovat,  that  is. 
Lord  or  Laird  of  Lovat ;  for  it  is  fit  to  know,  that  the  appellation  of  lord  or  laird 
in  our  old  stile  is  one  and  the  same  ;  and  John,  a  second  son,  who  was  the  first  of 
the  Frasers  of  Knock  in  Ayrshire,  of  whom  most  of  the  prime  gentry  in  those  parts 
are  collaterally  descended.  He  had  also  another  son,  of  whom  is  descended  the  fa- 
mily of  Foyers  and  its  cadets. 

This  Hugh  is  designed  Dominus  de  Lovat,  and  Hugo  Frisale  de  Lovat,  his  son,  was 
one  of  the  hostages  for  the  ransom  of  Ki"hg  James  I.  as  is  vouched  by  the  Fcedera 
Anglia  in  the  1423.     But  it  is  plain  he  was  no  peer,  nor  had  we  any  lords  of  Par- 


APPENDIX.  1C5 

liament,  as  distinct  from  other  barons,  who  held  of  the  crown  in  capite,  before  the 
reign  of  King  James  I. 

This  Hugh  Fraser  Lord  of  the  Lovat,  as  he  is  called,  that  is  no  more  than  Laird 
of  Lovat,  in  the  1416  married  Janet,  sister  of  William  of  Fenton,  Lord  or  Laird 
of  that  Ilk,  by  whom  he  got  a  great  estate  in  land  in  Inverness-shire.  The  mar- 
riage articles  are  in  the  old  Scots  language  ;  the  parties  contracting  are  designed 
Hutcheon  Fraser  Lord  of  the  Lovat,  and  William  of  Fenton,  Lord  of  that  Ilk  : 
But  that  this  was  no  more  than  laird  or  proprietor  of  these  estates  is  plain ;  for, 
in  the  143 1,  when  King  James  I.  ratifies  the  contract  under  the  Great  Seal,  he 
says,  "  Sciatis  nos  vidisse  cartam  Hugonis  Fraser  de  Lovat,  &•  Willielmi  Fenton 
"  de  eodem :"  So  that  it  is  clear  that  neither  the  parties  are  in  the  rank  of  lord's 
of  Parliament,  but  only  of  ordinary  barons.  This  Hugh  died  about  this  time,  and 
was  succeeded  by  his  son 

Alexander  Fraser  of  Lovat.  He  died  without  issue-male  in  the  1430,  and 
was  succeeded  by  Hugh  Fraser  of  Lovat  his  brother,  as  he  is  designed  in  the  re- 
tour,  as  heir  to  Alexander  Fraser  of  Lovat  his  brother;  the  voucher  is  in  Hadding- 
ton's Collections.  This  Hugh  is  the  first  lord  or  peer  of  this  noble  family  :  but 
whether  he  was  raised  to  be  a  lord  of  Parliament  by  King  James  II.  or  James  HI. 
is  not  so  clear  ;  for  we  must  knov/  that  the  lords  of  Parliament,  about  this  time, 
were  not  created  by  letters  patent,  as  in  after  times,  but  by  the  king's  naming  the 
person  to  be  raised  and  advanced  to  the  honour,  to  be  a  Baron  and  Banrent  of 
our  Sovereign  Lord's  Parliament. 

That  this  Hugh  is  the  first  Lord  of  the  House  of  Lovat,  is  plainly  vouched  from 
the  public  archives  in  the  Parliament-house  ;  for  there  is  a  charter  confirmed  by 
King  James  III.  ratifying  a  charter  by  Hugo  Dominus  Fraser  de  Lovat,  ac  Baronix  de 
Kinnell,  to  John  Stirling,  of  some  part  of  the  barony  of  Kinnell,  in  the  year  1476, 
of  which  the  Lord  Lovat  was  superior ;  which  is  sufficient  to  instruct,  that  the  fa- 
mily of  Lovat  were  then,  and  might  have  been  before,  in  the  rank  and  quality  of 
lords  of  Parliament.  This  noble  lord  allied  by  marriage  with  the  House  of  Glammis, 
the  ancestor  of  the  Earl  of  Strathmore,  by  whom  he  had  tW'o  sons,  Thomas,  his 
heir,  and  Alexander,  of  whom  is  descended  the  family  of  Faraline,  and  its  nume- 
rous branches. 

Thomas  Lord  Fraser  of  Lovat,  who  is  invested  in  his  estate  as  heir  to  Hugh 
Lord  Fraser  of  Lovat  his  father,  in  the  year  15QI.  He  allied  by  marriage  with 
the  family  of  Huntly,  by  whom  he  had  a  son,  Hugh,  his  heir,  William  of  Kilbokie, 
and  James  of  Belladrum,  whose  male  issue  are  spread  into  many  branches  of  Erasers 
in  Inverness-shire.  He  married  again  with  the  house  of  Gray,  by  whom  he  had  a 
son,  who  was  the  first  of  the  Erasers  of  Brackie  and  Kirkhill. 

Hugh,  the  next  Lord  Lovat,  married  Anne,  daughter  of  James  Grant  of  Ereuchie, 
Laird  of  Grant,  and  had  Hugh  his  heir  apparent,  who  died  without  issue.  He 
married  to  his  second  wife  Anne,  daughter  of  David  Ross  of  Balnagovvn,  heir- 
male  and  representative  of  tlie  ancient  and  illustrious  family  of  the  Earls  of  Ross. 
Ot  this  marriage  he  had  Alexander  his  heir,  and  William  of  Struy,  of  whom  are 
descended  several  of  the  families  of  the  Erasers  in  Inverness-shire.  He  had  also 
another  son,  of  whom  is  descended  the  family  of  Relick,  of  which  Fraser  of  Gort- 
leg  is  a  branch.  This  Lord  Hugh  was  slain  in  a  bloody  conflict  betwixt  him  and 
the  M'Donalds,  at  a  place  called  Lochlochy,  the  15th  of  July  1544,  of  which 
Buchanan  makes  mention,  and  speaks  of  the  Erasers  with  great  honour,  as  a  fami- 
ly that,  upon  all  occasions,  had  merited  highly  of  their  country. 

Alexander  Lord  Lovat  married  a  lady  cf  the  Campbells,  of  the  illustrious 
House  of  Argyle,  and  had  Hugh,  his  heir  and  successor  ;  and  of  his  younger  sou 
Thomas,  tutor  of  Lovat,  are  several  families  of  the  Erasers  lineally  come,  particu- 
larly the  families  of  Strichen  and  Ardachie. 

Hugh  the  next  Lord  Lovat  married  Ehsabeth,  daughter  of  John  Earl  of  Athol ; 
her  mother  was  the  Lord  Fleming's  daughter  ;  she  was  afterwards  Countess  of 
March,  and  last  of  all  Countess  of  Arran.     She  bore  to  the  Lord  Lovat  a  son 

Simon  Lord  Eraser  of  Lovat,  who  was  in  a  high  degree  of  favour  with  King 
James  VI.  Upon  the  death  of  the  Earl  of  Athol,  his  uncle,  in  the  1594,  when 
that  dignity  became  extinct,  on  the  failure  of  the  heirs-male,  this  lord  had  the 
ofiiT  of  the  title  of  Earl  of  Athol.  but  he  declined  accepting  of  the  honour,  as  a 

Vol.  IL  '  .5  M 


no  APPENDIX. 

sinking  of  his  own  title  of  Lord  Lovat,  which  he  could  not  think  ot ;  and,  upon 
that,  the  title,  honour,  and  dignity  of  Earl  of  Athol  was,  de  novo,  conferred 
on  the  Lords  Innermeath,  as  being  a  Stewart,  and  originally  of  the  same  blood 
with  the  Earls  of  Athol,  as  the  letters  patent  bear,  still  extant  m  the  archives. 
This  noble  lord  married  first  with  a  lady  of  the  House  of  Kintail,  by  whom  he  had 
Hugh  the  next  lord  of  the  family.  He  married  next  Jean,  daughter  of  James  Lord 
Doune,  paternal  ancestor  of  the  present  Earl  of  Moray,  by  whom  he  had  two  sons, 
of  whom  two  different  branches  of  the  House  of  Lovat  are  descended,  viz.  the  fa- 
milies of  Inneralachy  and  Brae. 

Hugh  Lord  Lovat  matched  with  the  Earl  of  Wemyss's  family  ;  her  mother  was 
the  Lord  Doune's  daughter,  and  sister  to  the  Earl  of  Moray,  by  whom  he  had 
Hugh,  Master  of  Lovat,  who  died  before  his  father,  but  left  a  son  by  his  wife,  who 
v.as  General  Leslie's  daughter,  the  first  Earl  of  Leven. 

Hugh,  who  succeeded  his  grandfather,  married  a  sister  of  the  Earl  of  Cromarty, 
by  whom  he  had 

Hugh,  who  married  the  Marquis  of  Athol's  daughter ;  but  dying  without  issue- 
male  the  14th  of  September  1696,  the  title,  honour,  and  dignity  of  Lord  Lovat, 
according  to  the  uniform  practice  and  descent  of  ancient  lord  barons,  devolved  on 
his  great  uncle, 

Thomas  Lord  Eraser  of  Lovat,  second  son  to  Hugh  Lord  Lovat,  and  Lady 
Isabel  Wemyss  his  wife  aforesaid.  He  married  with  the  family  of  M'Leod  of  that 
Ilk,  by  whom  he  had  fourteen  children,  ten  of  whom  died  young  ;  his  eldest  son, 
Mr  Alexander  Eraser,  died  in  his  25th  year,  universally  lamented,  being  one  of 
the  brightest,  and  every  way  best  accomplished  young  gentlemen  that  ever  this 
noble  family  had  at  any  time  produced ;  Simon  Lord  Lovat,  Mr  John  Eraser  who 
died  a  batchelor  in  the  1716,  and  a  daughter  Sybilla, 

Simon  the  present  Lord  Lovat,  succeeded  his  father  in  the  honour  upon  his  death 
in  1698.  His  lordship  has  acted  and  suffered  much  for  his  country  and  family 
ever  since  his  accession  to  the  honour ;  so  that  he  may  well  be  called  the  rebuilder 
of  his  house,  and  the  restorer  of  his  family,  which  is  one  of  the  things  in  the 
world  he  has  most  at  heart.  He  married  Margaret,  daughter  of  Lodovick  Grant 
of  that  Ilk,  by  whom  he  has  two  sons, 

Simon,  Master  of  Lovat,  and  Mr  Alexander  Eraser ;  also  two  daughters,  Janet 
and Sybilla,  and  a  son  and  a  daughter  dead  of  the  same  marriage. 


MORAY  OF  Abercajrny. 


IN  the  First  Part  of  this  work  the  armorial  bearing  of  Moray  of  Abercairny 
was,  by  a  mistake,  wrong  inserted  ;  for  the  cheveron,  which  shows  their  alliance 
with,  and  descent  from,  the  old  Earls  of  Strathern,  is  not  carried  between  the  tliree 
stars,  (their  paternal  coat)  but  is  quartered  with  it ;  as  they  are  to  be  found  re- 
corded in  the  Lyon  Office,  where  they  stand  thus  matriculate,  viz.  Moray  of  Aber- 
cairny carries  two  coats  quarterly,  first  and  last  azure,  three  stars  argent,  within  a 
double  tressure  counter-flowered  or,  second  and  third  or,  two  cheverons  gules, 
above  the  shield  an  helmet  befitting  his  degree,  with  a  mantle  gules  doubling 
argent,  and  on  a  wreath  of  his  colours  is  set  for  his  crest  an  earl's  crown  surmount- 
ed of  a  star  of  twelve  rays  argent,  and,  on  an  escrol  above,  this  motto,  Suns  tncbe, 
and  in  another  below,  Tanti  talem  genuere  parentes,  supported  by  two  eagles 
proper. 

For  understanding  the  reason  of  this  bearing,  we  are  to  observe,  that  Sir  John 
Moray  of  Drumshergard,  a  son  of  the  ancient  House  of  Bothwell,  (of  whom  in  the 
First  Volume,  page  249)  married  Mary,  daughter  to  Malise  Earl  of  Strathern, 
with  whom  he  obtained  the  lands  of  Abercairny,  Ogilvie,  Glensherop,  &.c.  as  was 
also  observed  in  the  First  Volume,  page  250. 


APPENDIX.  lit 

This  Sir  John  Moray  of  Drumshergaid,  the  direct  paternal  ancestor  of  the 
present  Aberciiirny,  had,  by  Mary  his  wife  aforesaid,  three  sons,  Sir  Maurice,  Sir 
Alexander,  and  Walter. 

Sir  Maurice  Moray  of  Drumshergard,  being  a  person  of  much  merit,  was  a  great 
flivoLtrite  of  King  David  II.  as  appears,  among  other  instances,  from  this  which 
follows.  Joanna  Countess  of  Strathern,  the  only  daughter  and  sole  heir  of  Malise 
Earl  of  Strathern,  the  uncle  of  Sir  Maurice  Moray,  having  married  the  Earl  of 
Warren,  an  English  lord,  was  by  that  means  drawn  into  a  conspiracy  against  King 
Robert  I.  for  which  she  was  forfeited,  and  the  earldom  of  Strathern  for  some  time 
vested  in  the  crown.  But  King  David  II.  King  Robert's  son,  in  consideration  of 
the  great  service  of  Sir  Maurice  Moray  (who,  upon  failing  of  the  issue  of  Earl 
Malise,  his  mother's  brother,  had  now  the  sole  right  of  blood  to  that  earldom) 
reversed  the  forfeiture,  and  conferred  the  earldom  of  Strathern  upon  the  said 
Sir  Maurice  Moray,  who  was  accordingly,  with  great  solemnity,  girt  with  the 
sword  of  the  said  earldom,  on  the  9th  of  February,  anno  1343,  t^pud  cns- 
trum  puellarum;  as  Sir  James  Balfour  from  the  records  of  King  David  in- 
forms us. 

Sir  Maurice  Moray,  now  Earl  of  Strathern,  accompanying  his  master  King 
David  in  his  second  expedition  into  England,  was  there  slain  at  the  battle  of  Dur- 
hajn,  on  the  17th  of  October  1346,  and,  leaving  no  issue  of  his  own  body  behind 
him,  his  brother  Sir  Alexander  Moray  of  Drumshergard  succeeded  to  his  paternal 
estate,  and  the  earldom  of  Strathern  returned  again  to  the  crown  ;  for,  as  Sir 
James  Balfour  observes,  it  was  given  to  him  and  his  heirs-male  to  be  begotten  of 
his  own  body,  "  quibus  deficientibus,"  that  the  said  earldom  should  return  to  the 
crown,  "  in  eo  statu  et  integritate  quo  earn  reliquerat  Malisius  quondam  Erneval- 
"  lensis  comes." 

This  Sir  Maurice,  upon  his  accession  to  the  Earldom  of  Strathern,  and  in  right 
of  his  mother,  quartered,  with  his  paternal  coat,  the  arms  of  the  old  Earl  of 
Strathern  his  uncle,  viz.  or,  two  cheverons  gules ;  and  his  brother  Sir  Alexander 
Moray,  who  succeeded  him  in  his  paternal  estate  of  Drumshergard,  Abercaivny, 
&-C.  had  the  same  right  of  blood  to  the  earldom  and  arms  of  Strathern  which 
his  brother  Sir  Maurice  had,  with  this  additional  merit,  that  his  brother  the  Earl 
had  been  killed  in  the  king's  service  at  the  battle  of  Durham  ;  but  the  king  hav- 
ing been  long  detained  prisoner  in  England,  after  that  unfortunate  battle  where 
his  Majesty  was  taken  prisoner,  Sir  Alexander  Moray  had  not  so  ready  access  to 
put  in  for  so  just  a  claim,  and  this  gave  Robert  Earl  of  Carrick,  Lord  High  Stew- 
ard of  Scotland,  and  afterwards  King,  time  and  opportunity  to  apply  to  King 
David  his  uncle,  for  the  estate  and  earldom  of  Strathern,  which  his  Majesty  was 
pleased  to  bestow  on  him.  However,  Sir  Alexander  Moray  retained  in  his  bear- 
ing the  arms  of  the  old  earls  of  Strathern,  for  the  reasons  above  mentioned,  and 
which  his  successors  in  the  House  of  Abercairny  do  carry  to  this  day,  as  may  be 
seen  dehneated  in  the  Plate  of  Achievements. 

There  is  likewise  another  mistake  in  the  First  Part  of  this  work,  page  249,  by 
which  the  author  makes  John  Moray  of  Ogilface,  who  grants  a  charter  to  the 
convent  ef  Holyroodhouse  in  the  year  1409,  with  his  seal  appended,  bearing  a 
fesse  between  three  stars,  2  and  i,  to  be  the  paternal  ancestor  of  Sir  Robert  Moray 
of  Abercairny. 

It  is  like  the  resemblance  of  the  titles  of  Ogilvie  and  Ogilfae  has  led  our  au- 
thor into  that  error ;  for  I  am  well  informed,  that  John  Murray  of  Ogilfae,  who 
granted  the  charter,  and  carried  the  arms  above  mentioned,  was  k  distinct  branch 
fif  the  Morays,  and  is  now  extinct ;  whereas  the  ancestor  of  the  deceased  Sir  Ro- 
bert Moray  of  Abercairny,  at  the  date  of  the  charter,  is  distinctly  known  by  ano- 
ther name  than  John,  and  by  the  titles  of  Drumshergard,  Abercairny,  and  Ogilvie, 
and  none  of  that  family,  whose  succession  is  clearly  documented,  and  is  still  extant 
in  the  person  of  William  Moray  of  Abercairny,  ever  carried  their  arms  with  a  fesse, 
as  mentioned  by  our  author. 


APPENDIX. 


CORSANE  OF  Meikleknox*. 

THIS  surname  and  family  have  it  handed  down  from  age  to  age,  that  the  first 
of  their  ancestors,  in  Scotland,  was  an  Italian  gentleman  of  the  Corsini  family,  who 
came  into  this  realm  with  an  abbot  of  New-Abbey,  or  Ditlce  Cor,  in  Galloway, 
about  the  year  1280.  This  abbey  was  founded  by  Dornagilla,  one  of  the  three 
daughters  and  co-heirs  of  Allan  Lord  of  Galloway,  and  wife  to  John  Baliol 
Lord  of  Bernard-Castle,  and  mother  to  John  Baliol,  who  was  sometime  King 
of  Scotland  ;  she  founded  also  the  Franciscan  monastery  at  Dumfries,  in  anito 
1262. 

Among  many  other  instances  that  might  be  given  of  this  ancient  name  and 
family  of  Corsanes,  appearing  from  authentic  vouchers,  this  is  one  :  Sir  Alexander 
Corsane  is  witness  to  a  charter  granted  by  Archibald  called  the  Gmn  or  Austere 
Earl  of  Douglas,  to  Sir  John  Stewart  Laird  of  Gryton,  of  the  lands  of  Cahe  ;  though 
the  charter  is  without  date,  yet  it  must  necessarily  have  been  before. the  year 
1400,  when  the  granter  of  that  charter  died. 

The  principal  family  of  Corsane  was  designed  of  Glen,  which,  in  the  reign  of 
King  James  IV.  went  off  with  Marion,  the  daughter  and  only  child  of  Sir  Robert 
Corsane  of  Glen,  by  marriage  to  Sir  Robert  Gordon,  who  thereupon  assumed  the 
title  of  Sir  Robert  Gordon  of  Glen,  and  came  to  be  designed  of  Lochinvar  by  the 
death  of  Sir  Alexander  his  elder  brother,  who  was  slain  at  the  battle  of  Flodden 
in  anno  1504.  And  of  that  lady  descended  lineally  the  barons  of  Lochinvar  and 
viscounts  of  Kenmure. 

Sir  John  Corsane,  an  early  cadet,  and  next  heir-male  of  this  family  of  Glen, 
settled  at  Dumfries,  where  he  increased  in  riches  and  honour,  and  had  a  lineal 
succession  of  heirs-male  for  eighteen  generations ;  and  that  they  were  all  of  the 
name  John,  has  been  constantly  asserted  by  that  family.  Some  of  their  brethren 
were  eccleijastics,  particularly  Dominus  Thomas  Corsanus,  (designed  perpetual  vicar 
of  Dumfries)  in  a  charter  granted  by  him  for  some  church-lands  in  Dumfries, 
dated  anno  1408. 

That  there  were  so  many  generations  of  that  family,  appears  as  well  by  other 
vouchers,  as  by  an  excellent  inscription  on  the  funeral  monument  of  John  Corsane, 
Provost  of  Dumfries,  in  the  reign  of  King  James  VI.  who  was  the  thirteenth  in 
order  descended  from  the  said  Sir  John  Corsane  inclusive,  in  a  direct  masculine 
course  of  succession. 

This  John  Corsane  was  married  to  Janet  Maxwell,  one  of  the  Lord  Maxwell's 
family,  who  bore  him  several  children,  particularly  John,  his  eldest  son  and  heir, 
afterwards  called  Mr  John  Corsane,  and  Marion,  who  was  married  to  Stephen 
Laurie  of  Maxwelton,  ancestor  of  Sir  Walter  Laurie  of  Maxwelton,  baronet.  He 
was  member  of  Parliament  for  the  burgh  of  Dumfries  in  the  year  1621,  when  the 
five  articles  of  the  Perth  assembly  received  the  sanction  of  a  law.  Having  in  his 
younger  years  executed  the  inferior  offices  of  the  magistracy  in  Dumfries,  he  was 
provost  of  the  said  burgh  forty-five  years,  died  when  he  was  aged  seventy-five 
years  and  an  half,  in  anno  1629,  and  was  buried  with  eleven  of  his  grandfathers, 
as  appears  by  the  said  funeral  monument  erected  to  his  memory  that  same  year, 
by  Mr  John  Corsane,  advocate,  his  son  and  heir ;  upon  which,  with  his  coat  of 
arms,  are  many  excellent  inscriptions,  in  commendation  of  his  learning,  justice, 
and  other  good  qualifications ;  of  which  the  following  are  a  specimen  : 

JOANNES  CORSANUS. 

f  ascibus  in  nostra  urbe,  senex,  reliquoque  juventa 
Functus  honore,  sub  hoc  clausus  atro  tumulo. 


*  The  heir-male  of  this  family  is   John   Corsane,  Esq.  of  Daluhat,  in  the  parish  of  Glencairn  and 
shirq  of  Dumfries.     E, 


APPENDIX.  XI J 


ANAGRAMA.     An  sanus,  Cor.  senio  > 

Sanus  et  in  sutnraa  fueras,  Corsane,  juventa, 
Sinus  et  in  summo,  Cor.  fueras  senio. 

Corde  tuo  saiio,  praecras  dum,  sive  juventa, 
Seu  senio,  res  liasc  publica  sana  stetit. 


JOANNES  CORSANUS. 
EPITAPHIUM. 

Ter  tria  fiitales  et  bis  tria  lustra  sorores 
Dimidiunique  JEvo  contribuere  tuo. 

Ter  tria  civiles  humerum  circumdare  Faces 
Lustra,  dedit  Sopliise  gratia  digna  tuae. 

Ter  tribus  ac  binis,  tandem  prognatus  eodein 
Et  lare,  Corsanis  contumularis  Avis. 


The  said  John  Corsane  being  dead,  as  above,  was  succeeded  in  his  lands  and' 
heritage  by  the  said  Mr  John  Coisane,  advocate,  his  son,  who  a  considerable  time 
before  had  married  Margaret  Maxwell,  one  of  the  daughters  and  co-heiresses  of 
Robert  Maxwell  of  Dmwoody,  a  branch  of  the  family  of  Maxwell,  by  whom  he 
had  issue.  John,  his  eldest  son  and  heir,  Helen,  who  was  married  to  Herries  of 
Mabie,  and  several  others.  With  the  said  Margaret  Maxwell,  his  spouse,  he  got 
the  lands  of  Barndennoch,  and  being  well  pleased  with  the  amenity  of  its  situation, 
after  he  had  put  his  son  John  in  possession  of  the  lands  of  Meikleknox,  he  some- 
times designed  himself  Mr  John  Corsane  of  Barndennoch.  He  was  a  very  rich 
man;  for  besides  his  country  estates  in  Nithsdale  and  Galloway,  it  is  credibly  re- 
ported he  had  a  third  part  of  the  burgh  of  Dumfries,  and  lands  thereto  belonging, 
either  in  property  or  superiority,  which  vouchers,  still  extant,  confirm:  And,  in- 
deed, there  are  many  old  houses  there  which  yet  bear  the  arms  of  the  family,  and 
some  of  them  are  quartered  with  the  arms  of  the  families  with  which  he  and  his 
predecessors  were  matched.  He  was  a  considerable  time  provost  of  Dumfries, 
about  the  time  of  the  civil  wars,  and  afterwards,  when  that  place  was  attacked  by 
the  royalists,  which  cost  him  dear.  He  outlived  his  said  son  John  Corsane  of 
Meikleknox,  and  died  in  a  good  old  age,  ai/no  1671. 

The  said  John  Corsane  married  Jean  Kirkpatrick,  daughter  to  Sir  Thomas 
Kirkpatrick  ot  Cioseburn,  by  whom  he  had  several  children ;  John,  his  eldest  son 
and  heir;  Charles,  who  was  a  captain  in  King  Charles  U.  his  army,  and,  being  in 
the  garrison  in  Tangier,  was  wounded  by  the  Moors  in  anno  1684;  thereafter  he 
was  advanced  to  be  a  colonel,  married  an  Irish  lady,  and  died  abroad  without  issue; 
Margaret,  the  eldest  daughter  of  the  said  John  Corsane,  was  married  to  James 
Grierson  of  Larglanglee,  a  son  of  Sir  Robert  Grierson  of  Lag,  and  had  several  sons 
and  daughters.  The  said  John  died  before  his  father,  as  above;  but  his  widow, 
Jean  Kirkpatrick,  lived  till  the  year  1696,  having  that  part  of  his  fortune,  by 
which  he  was  designed,  as  her  jointure. 

The  said  John  Corsane  of  Meikleknox  married  Marion  Maxwell,  daughter  to 
James  Maxwell  of  Tinwald,  (branched  from  an  immediate  son  of  the  illustrious  fa- 
mily of  Maxwell)  by  his  wife  Elizabeth  Gnerson,  one  of  the  daughters  of  the  said. 
Sir  Robert  Grierson  of  Laij;  they  had  several  children,  John,  his  eldest  son  and 
heir,  Agnes,  spouse  to  Mr  I'eterRae,  minister  of  the  gospel  at  Kirkbride,  and  others, 
who  died  unmarried.  The  said  John  Corsane  died  February  2.  1680,  and  was  suc- 
ceeded by  his  son  John,  who  was  then  but  eight  years  old;  and  Marion  Maxwell, 
his  widow,  died  5th  November  1697. 

His  said  son,  John  Corsane  of  Meikleknox,  married,  but  died  without  any  issue, 
19th  September  1717;  however  his  wife  being  with  child  brought  forth  a  son 
some  months  after  iiis  decea^e,  which  was  also  called  John,  and  made  the  eighteenth- 
heir-male  of  that  family  of  Corsane,  by  a  lineal  course  of  succession. 

Vol.  II.  5  N 


4 14  APPENDIX,. 

This  child  having  died  in  February  1721,  the  right  to  that  estate  devolved  on 
the  said  Agnes,  who  had  t'.velve  children,  whereof  nine  came  to  the  age  of  men 
and  women.  Robert  Rae,  her  eldest  son  and  heir  apparent,  is,  by  his  mother's 
special  destination  in  anno  1731,  with  the  special  advice  and  consent  of  the  said 
Mr  Peter  Rae  her  husband,  to  succeed  to-  his  maternal  ancestors,  and  to  assume 
the  surname  of  Corsane,  and  the  arms  of  the  family  of  Meikleknox,  which  he  hath 
done.  She  is  the  only  heir  of  line,  now  alive,  to  her  uncle  Robert  iVIaxwell  of 
Tinwald. 

Blazon. — The  ancient  armorial  bearing  of  Corsane  of  Meikleknox,  in  the  stew- 
artry  of  Kirkcudbright  in  Galloway,  is  urgent,  on  a  fesse  azure,  a  savage's  head 
erased,  distilling  drops  of  blood,  ajid  pierced  through  with  two  darts,  disposed  in 
saltier,  points  downwards,  all  proper,  betwixt  three  mascles  in  chief,  and  as  many 
mullets  in  base,  gules;  supported  by  two  soldiers,  armed  cap-a-pee,  each  of  them 
carrying  a  target  on  their  sinister  arm,  and  both  girded  with  swords ;  he  on  the 
dexter  embracuig  and  holding  up  a  spear,  erected  in  pale,  ensigned  on  the  top 
with  a  lion's  h^ad  erased,  looking  to  the  left;  and  he  on  the  sinister  bearing  up 
another  spear  also  erect  in  pale,  and  ensigned  with  an  eagle,  all  proper,  and  both 
standing  on  a  compartment:  Above  the  shield  an  helmet  befitting  his  degree,  with 
a  mantle  ^///^j,  .doubled  argent;  and  on  a  torce,  or  wreath,  of  his  colours,  is  set, 
for  crest,  an  eagle  crowned  with  an  antique  crown,  and  looking  up  to  the  sun  in 
his  glory,  all  proper;  and,  for  motto,  on  an  escrol  above  all^  these  words,  Pramium 
virtutis  gloria. 


A    GENEALOGICAL    ACCOUNT    OF    THE    FAMILY    OF    CHALMERS    OF    BaLNECRAIG 

AND  Cults. 


THIS  ancient  family  of  Balnecraig  (still  existing  in  the  shire  of  Aberdeen) 
bears  for  their  armorial  arms  argent,  a  demi-lion  rampant,  issuing  out  of  a  fesse 
gules,  with  a  flower-de-luce  in  base  of  the  last ;  and,  for  crest,  an  eagle  in  a  rising 
posture,  proper  ;  with  the  motto,  Spero. 

For  instructing  the  said  arms  to  be  the  particular  coat  of  this  family,  they,  at 
this  day,  remain  to  be  seen  both  cut  on  stone  on  their  burial  place,  and  carved  on 
wood  on  their  seat  within  St  Nicholas's  Church  of  Aberdeen,  whereon  is  also  insert- 
ed two  ancient  inscriptions  ;  the  first  whereof  is,  "  Hie  jacet  providus  &  honorabilis 
"  vir  Alexander  de  Camera  de  Murthil,  prepositus  hujus  burgi  de  Aberdeen,  qui 
"  obiit  octavo  die  mensis  Octobris,  anno  Dom.  1413."  The  other  is  "  Alexan- 
"  der  de  Camera  consulis  ejusque  familiffi  multorum  saeculorum  prosapia  ho- 
"  noribus,  que  conspicus  requietorium  &•  cathedra,  1313."  Which  arms  and 
inscriptions  are  proven  to  be  cut  on  the  foresaid  places,  by  the  notorial  attestation 
of  Robert  Thomson  and  Walter  Cochran,  notars-public,  as  is  clear  from  the  ori- 
ginal copy  (which  I  did  see)  subscribed  by  them  at  Aberdeen  the  12th  November 

1730- 

But  though  the  arms  of  this  family  be  cut  on  their  seat  in  the  said  church, 
adorned  with  all  suitable  exterior  ornaments,  to  which  are  added  supporters,  viz. 
two  angels,  yet,  on  the  consideration  that  the  House  of  Balnecraig  is  of  greater  an- 
tiquity than  the  usage  of  supporters  in  arms,  it  is  more  probable  to  think  that  this 
addition  has  been  but  a  fancy  of  the  carver  to  decore  his  work,  seeing  the  oldest 
books  of  blazons  we  now  have  that  are  extant,  though  the  above  arms  of  this 
family  be  therein  recorded,  yet  nothing  of  supporters  is  to  be  found  as  proper 
thereto. 

As  to  the  original  of  this  surname  of  Chalmers  in  the  north  of  Scotland,  it  is 
most  probable  that  they  are  a  branch  of  the  clan  Cameron,  from  the  affinity  of 
both  their  arms :  And  besides.  Sir  George  Mackenzie,  in  his  Genealogical  Manu- 
script of  the  Famihes  of  Scotland,  tells  us,  "  That  one  of  this  clan  going  to  France, 


APPENDIX.  11- 

«■  put  his  name  in  a  Latin  dress,  by  designing  himself  Cdmcrnriiis,  which  in  French 
"  IS  De  la  Chambre,  who,  upon  liis  return  to  Scotland,  according  to  our  dialect, 
"  was  called  Chalmers;  wliich  tradition,  says  the  said  Sir  George,  is  the  more  coii- 
"  fumed  by  the  flower- de-luce  earned  in  base  in  their  arms ;  which  addition  their 
"  predecessor  has  no  doubt  got  when  in  France,  for  some  meritorious  action  done 
"  there." 

Again,  as  to  the  rise  of  the  name  Cameron,  it  hath  certainly  had  its  beginning 
from  an  accidental  note,  particularly  that  their  predecessor  hath  hud  a  wry  no^e  ; 
for  in  the  Irish  tongue  this  name  signifies  as  much:  and  from  such  accidental  notes 
the  custom  was,  and  is  at  present,  in  the  Higiilands  of  Scotland,  to  assume  sur- 
names taken  from  particular  marks  in  the  face  or  body  of  the  principal  chieftain, 
or  leader  of  their  clan,  in  imitation  of  the  old  Roman  surnames,  Caesar,  Balbus, 
Naso,  8ic.  There  are  others  again  that  derive  the  origin  of  this  name  from  the 
designation  De  Camera,  or  office  of  Chamberlain ;  but  that  those  of  the  surname  of 
Clialmers  in  the  North  have  their  name  and  descent  from  the  clan  Cameron,  and 
those  in  the  South  from  the  oflice  of  Chamberlain,  will  clearly  appear  by  wliat 
follows. 

For  in  respect  the  ancient  descent  and  origin  of  families  cannot  be  so  well  found 
out  by  surnames,  as  by  their  armorial  bearings,  (as  all  judicious  antiquaries  allow") 
arms  being  of  greater  antiquity  than  surnames,  it  is  then  demonstratively  evident, 
that  Chalmers  of  Balnecraig  in  the  north,  and  that  of  Gadgirth  in  tlie  southwest 
of  Scotland,  are  two  distinct  families,  and  descended  from  a  different  stock  and 
race  of  progenitors  ;  for  though  both  these  families  retain  the  same  name,  yet  by 
their  arms  it  appears  they  are  descended  of  different  ancestors,  on  the  account 
there  is  not  one  figure  in  the  arms  of  the  one  that  corresponds  with  the  arms  of 
the  other;  for  the  clan  Cameron  carry  two  fesses  gules  for  their  arms,  and  Balne- 
craig, as  a  descendant  therefrom,  bears  one  of  these  fesses  agreeable  in  tincture  ■ 
also;  which  figure,  being  generally  taken  by  heralds  to  signify  the  military  belt, 
or  girdle  of  honour,  denotes  the  valour  of  their  ancestors;  whereas  the  arms  of 
Gadgirth  are  quite  different,  as  will  appear  by  the  following  blazon  thereof,  as  it 
stands  recorded  in  the  oldest  register  of  arms  in  Scotland,  authorised  by  Sir  David 
Lindsay  of  Mount,  who  was  Lyon  King  at  Arms  to  King  James  V.  and  confirmed 
to  be  the  true  register  of  arms  for  Scotland,  by  the  said  King  in  council,  the  ori- 
ginal copy  being  now  in  the  Lawyers'  Library  at  Edinburgh,  ot  which  coat  the 
blazon  follows,  viz.  two  coats,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  azure,  a  mullet  argent; 
second  and  third  azure,  a  fesse  cheque,  argent  and  gules.  And  it  is  further  to  be 
observed,  that  in  the  Register  of  Arms  belonging  to  the  present  Lord  Lyon  of  this 
kingdom,  the  cadets  of  Gadgirth's  family  are  tliere  also  matriculated  with  the  said 
quartered  coat,  only  distinguished  with  suitable  differences. 

From  hence  I  infer,  that,  forasmuch  as  in  those  shires  where  the  Great  Steward 
of  Scotland  had  interest  of  old,  most  of  the  families,  then  re^identers  there,  were 
in  use  to  chequer  the  figures  in  their  arms  from  the  Great  Steward's  fesse  cheque, 
upon  the  account  of  patronage,  who,  being  all  vassals,  did  the  same  to  show  their 
dependence  on  him;  and  Gadgirth's  predecessors  being  unquestionably  one  of  nis 
vassals,  his  lands  lying  in  the  shire  of  Ayr,  where  he  had  interest,  it  has  been  on 
that  account  he  hath  assumed,  and  still  carries  the  said  fesse  cheque ;  and  probably 
being  one  of  his  chamberlains,  his  descendants  hath  afterwards  taken  the  surname 
De  Camera,  or  Chalmers. 

And  certainly  this  name  De  Camera  has  led  Sir  George  Mackenzie  into  the  mis- 
take of  narrating  that  Gadgirth's  predecessor  v>as  descended  of  the  clan  Cameron, 
from  the  affinity  of  the  name  De  Camera.  And,  besides,-  gives  him  the  particular 
arms  of  Balnecraig,  on  the  account  (no  doubt)  that  he  had  never  seen  any  docu- 
ments to  instruct  that  family's  antiquity.  But  to  prove  the  same,  I  proceed  nexf 
to  narrate  the  authentic  charters  following. 

And,  first,  there  is  a  charter  still  extant,  granted  by  Andrew  Garviehaugh  of 
Caskieben,  to  Robert  Chalmers,  and  Helen  his  spouse,  who  was  aunt  to  the  said 
Andrew,  of  the  lands  of  Belode,  Balnecraig,  and  Telanchsyn,  with  their  pertinents, 
and  a  half  merk  of  silver  out  of  the  mill  of  Lunfanan  yearly,  to  be  holden  by  him 
and  his  said  spouse,  and  the  lawful  heirs  of  their  body,  in  feu  of  the  Earl  Murray, 
for  a  pair  of  white  gloves  at  Pentecost  yearly,  at  the  manor  of  Caskieben,  if  asked; 


n6  APPENDIX. 

and  if  it  happen  that  the  said  Robert  and  Helen  die  without  lawful  heirs  of  their 
body,  in  thai  case  these  lands,  with  their  pertinents,  are  providea  U>  the  said  Ro- 
berts heirs  whatsoever.  This  is  dated  at  Aberd .en  the  &th  August  1357.  And 
which  charter  is  confirmed  to  the  said  Robert  Chalmers,  (wherein  he  is  designed 
of  Kintore)  and  to  Helen  Garviehaugh  his  spouse,  by  Isabel  Randolph,  daughter  and 
heir  to  John  Randolph  Earl  of  Murray,  Lord  Annandale  and  Man. 

From  this  charter  of  confirmation  I  observe,  that  the  said  Robert  Chalmers  was 
a  gentleman  of  an  estate  of  his  own,  to  wit,  the  lands  of  Kintore,  before  ever  iie 
got  the  lands  mentioned  in  the  above  charter  ;  so  that  it  cannot  be  doubted 
but  his  predecessors  were  of  a  much  older  standing  in  the  north  parts  of  this  kmg- 
dom  than  the  date  of  the  above  charters ;  neither  is  it  to  be  thought  that  the 
said  Andrew  Garviehaugh  would  have  so  much  preferred  his  aunt  as  to  dispone 
hib  said  lands,  failing  her  and  her  issue,  to  the  said  Robert  Chalmers  and  his  heirs 
whatsomever,  if  he  had  not  been  both  a  man  of  merit  and  a  fortune  ;  that  he 
was  the  first,  the  foresaid  charter  demonstrates  in  the  onerous  cause  of  granting 
it,  viz.  "  Pro  bono  et  fideli  conciJio,  et  auxilio  suo  mihi  impenso  et  impendeudu :" 
and  that  he  had  a  fortune,  the  confirmation  whereof  designs  him  Laird  of  Kin- 
tore. 

The  above  Andrew  Garviehaugh  was  also  a  gentleman  of  a  good  descent,  be- 
ing son  of  Sir  James  Garviehaugh,  who  had  from  the  great  Sir  Thomas  Randolph 
Earl  of  Murray,  a  charter  of  the  lands  of  Belode,  Balnecraig,  Cloychock,  and  Ta- 
lanchsyn,  with  their  pertinents,  and  half  a  nierk  of  silver  yearly  out  of  the  mill  of 
Lunfcinan,  which  is  sealed  with  the  said  Earl's  seal  at  his  regality  of  Murray  ;  but 
though  it  hath  no  date,  yet  it  is  well  known  when  the  said  Earl  flourished,  being 
one  of  King  Robert  the  Bruce's  generals.  All  which  original  charters  1  saw  and 
perused,  and  are  still  extant  in  the  custody  of  Roderick  Chalmers,  Ross-Herald,  a 
descendant  of  this  ancient  family. 

But  not  having  seen  more  sufficient  documents  to  trace  down  the  descendants 
of  the  House  of  Balnecraig  to  this  present,  I  shall  only  narrate  what  Baihe  Skeen 
hath  inserted  in  his  Survey  of  Aberdeen,  which  is  printed  there  in  octavo,  anno  1685, 
where,  in  his  Catalogue  of  the  Provosts  of  that  city,  page  246,  is  set  down  that 
Willielmus  dc  Camera  (son  of  the  aforesaid  Robert  of  Kintore  and  Balnecraig)  was 
Provost  of  Aberdeen  in  the  year  1392,  and  several  years  after,  as  is  clear  from  the 
oldest  court-book  of  that  city,  which  is  in  Latin,  and  dated  anno  1398  ;  also 
William  Chalmers  was  likewise  provost  there,  a?ino  1404.  And  Thomas  de  Camera 
bore  the  same  character,  anno  i^iz,  and  many  years  after.  And  Alexander  Chal- 
mers was  hkewise  provost  there  in  the  year  1443,  and  for  sundry  difterent  years 
after,  even  to  anno  1595,  at  which  time  he  is  designed  of  Murthill :  and  besides 
in  the  public  registers  1  find  a  charter  granted  by  Alexander  Chalmers  of  Balne- 
craig to  Henry  Forbes,  of  the  lands  of  Thomaston  and  Fullarton,  with  an  annual- 
rent  of  five  shillings  out  of  the  king's  lands  of  Kinkell  and  Diss,  in  the  thanage 
of  Kintore  and  shire  of  Aberdeen,  to  be  holden  blench  of  the  king  for  a  silver 
penny.  This  is  dated  at  Aberdeen  the  7th  of  April,  and  confirmed  at  St  Andrews 
1st  March  1535.  I  next  proceed  to  the  family  of  Cults,  an  early  cadet  of  Balne- 
craig. 

The  genealogy  of  tliis  family  of  Cults  I  shall  set  down  as  I  find  it  narrated  in 
the  principal  Litera  Prosapiue,  granted  by  King  Charles  IL  to  Mary  Margaret  Urrey, 
dated  at  Edinburgh  17th  June,  and  sealed  with  the  Great  Seal  the  9th  September 
1669,  finely  wrote  on  vellum  ;  as  also  from  a  genealo;^ical  tree  of  this  family  il- 
luminate, and  approven  by  Sir  Charles  Erskine,  Lord  Lyon,  and  whereto  his  sub- 
scription and  seal  of  office-is  aifixed  at  Edinburgh  the  26th  January  1669,  to  which 
Joseph  Stacy  and  John  BosiUie,  heralds,  are  subscribers ;  both  which  authentic  do- 
cuments are  also  in  the  custody  of  the  foresaid  Mr  Chalmers,  Ross-Herald,  which  I 
persued,  and  have  farther  supplied  from  authors  and  records  of  unquestionable 
credit,  as  follows : 

And  first,  Alexander  Chalmers  of  Cults,  a  son  of  the  House  of  Balnecraig,  mar- 
ried Agnes  Hay,  daughter  of  the  Earl  of  Errol,  by  whom  Alexander,  his  succes- 
sor, who  married  Janet,  daughter  to  John  Leslie  of  that  Ilk,  by  vifhom  Alexander 
Chalmers  of  Cults  and  Methlick  in  Aberdeenshire,  who  married  Elizabeth  Doug- 
las, daughter  to  Glenbervie,  by  whom  Thomas  of  Cults  and  Methlick,  who  is  serv- 


APPENDIX.  ri7 

ved  heir  to  his  said  father  Alexander,  before  tlie  sheriff  of  Aberdeen,  in  the  yc:ir 
1505  as  appears  by  the  original  retour  still  extant  in  the  custody  of  the  said  Mr 
Chalmers,  which  I  saw  :  this  Thomas  married  Mary  Menzies,  daughter  to  Pitfod- 
dels,  by  whom  Alexander.  There  is  a  precept  of  sasine  in  the  public  register,  granted 
by  Thomas  Chalmers  of  Cults,  to  Alexander  his  second  son,  for  iafefting  him  in  the 
haill  lands  of  Cults,  and  mill  thereof,  wit li  the  pertinents,  lying  in  the  parish  of 
Tarland  and  shire  of  Aberdeen,  to  be  holdea  in  ward  by  him  and  his  heirs-mule. 
This  is  daied  at  Aberdeen  the  Bth  May,  and  confirmed  at  Edinburgh  the  27th  of 
the  said  month,  anno  1549;  he  was  also  Laird  of  Strichen,  as  is  evident  from  a 
charter  granted  by  Alexander  Chalmers  of  Strichen  to  Thomas,  son  to  Alexander 
Eraser  of  Philortli  of  the  Mains  of  Strichen,  with  the  mill  thereof,  to  be  holden 
ward;  this  is  dated  at  Faithlie,  6th  December  1558,  and  confirmed  at  Edinburgh 
2d  August  1559.  This  Alexander  married  Helen  Rait,  daughter  to  Halgreen,  by 
whom  Alexander  Chalmers  of  Cults,  who  married  Janet  Lumisden,  daugiiter  to 
Cushnie  ;  for  proof  hereof  there  is  a  precept  of  sasine  granted  by  Alexander  to 
this  Alexander  his  son,  and  Janet  Lumisden  his  spouse,  upon  the  lands  of  Cults  and 
mill  thereof,  dated  9th  February  1565  ;  the  sasine  following,  thereupon  is  dated 
24th  May  1566  :  This  Alexander  was  Provost  of  Aberdeen,  anno  1567,  as  the  said 
Bailie  Skene  narrates,  ibid.  By  this  marriage  he  had  two  sons,  first,  Gilbert  his 
successor,  and  Air  William,  minister  at  Boyndie,  of  whom  after.  As  to  the  eldest 
son,  Gilbert  Chalmers  of  Cults,  there  is  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal,  confirm- 
ing a  charter  granted  by  his  father  to  him,  of  the  lands  and  mill  of  Cults,  with  the 
woods  called  Bogs,  all  lying  in  the  parish  of  Tarland,  and  shire  of  Aberdeen,  dated 
4th  November  i6oi,  with  a  precept  also  under  the  Great  Seal,  for  infefting  the 
said  Gilbert  in  the  said  lands,  which  he  afterwards  sold  to  Lesmoir,  as  is  confirm- 
ed by  a  sasine  in  favours  of  Sir  James  Gordon  appearand  of  Lesmoir  of  the  lands 
of  Cults,  comprehending  the  other  lands  therein  insert,  follovting  upon  a  charter 
by  Gilbert,  son  of  Alexander  Chalmers  of  Cults.  The  charter  is  dated  the  29th 
January,  and  the  sasine  the  istof  February  161 2.  This  Gilbert  married  Elizabeth 
Eraser,  daughter  to  Dores,  by  whom  Alexander  Chalmers  of  Cults,  who  married 
Janet,  daughter  of  James  Irvine  of  Drum,  by  whom  Alexander  of  Cults,  who  mar- 
ried Marjory,  daughter  of  Robert  Lumisden  of  Cushnie,  advocate,  by  whom  only 
a  daughter,  Marjory  Chalmers,  who  married  John  Urie  of  Pitfichy,  by  whom  a 
son,  Sir  John  Urie,  who  was  a  captain  abroad,,  where  he  married  Mary  Magdalen, 
daughter  of  Christopher  Sebastian  van  jaxheim  of  Exlabrun  in  Germany,  by  w  horn 
a  daughter,  Mary  Margaret  Urie,  Lady  Lamont,  who  is  the  person  that  procured 
the  foresaid  litera  prosapia.  This  Sir  John  Urie  coming  afterwards  to  Scotland  with 
the  magnanimous  James  Marquis  of  Montrose,  was  made  his  Lieutenant-general,  anno 
1643,  and,  some  days  after  the  Marquis's  execution,  was  himself  beheaded  at  the 
Cross  of  Edinburgh  for  his  loyalty,  anno  1650. 

I  next  proceed  to  speak  of  Mr  William  Chalmers,  second  son  to  the  above  Alex- 
ander of  Cults,  Provost  of  Aberdeen.  He  was  the  first  legally  establirhed  minister 
at  the  kirk  of  Boyndie  (in  the  shire  of  Banff"  and  diocese  of  Aberdeen)  after  the  Re- 
formation, and  married  Elizabetii,  daughter  of  Mr  William  Chalmers  (of  the  same 
family  of  Cults)  minister  of  Skene,  near  Aberdeen,  by  whom  four  sons,  all  clergy- 
men, viz.  first,  Mr  William,  minister  at  Fettercairn  in  the  Merns,  who  married 
Elizabeth,  daughter  to  Barclay  of  Towie,  by  whom  two  sons,  Mr  William,  minis- 
ter at  Glammis  in  Angus,  and  Mr  James,  minister  at  CuUen  in  Banffshire.  He 
was  sent  to  England  by  the  episcopal  clergy  in  the  north  of  Scotland,  who  took 
tlie  oaths  at  the  Revolution  (yet  were  molested  by  the  kirk  judicatories)  to  solicit 
their  affairs  at  court,  and  was  introduced  to  her  late  Majesty  Q_iieen  Anne,  by  Dp 
Compton  then  Bishop  of  London,  immediately  after  her  accetlion  to  the  crown,  to 
whom  he  presented  an  address  from  his  brethren,  which  was  graciously  received  ; 
and  besides,  she  settled  a  pension  on  him  of  l^.  100  StexWng  per  annum,  that  his 
being  there  might  be  no  expence  to  his  constituents,  who  were  necessitate  to  have 
one  always  upon  the  spot,  to  represent  their  case  from  time  to  time,  as  emergen- 
cies required,  in  which  station  he  continued  till  his  death. 

The  second  son  of  Mr  William  Chalmers,  minister  of  Boyndie,  was  Mr  James, 
parson  of  Paisley,  of  whom  hereafter.  His  third  son  was  INJr  John,  minister  of 
Peterhead  in  Aberdeenshire,  who,  married  Mary,  daughter  of  Keith  of  Whiteriggs, 

Vol.  1L  5  O 


Ii8  APPENDIX. 

sheriff  of  Mcrns,  a  near  relation  of  the  family  of  the  Earl  Macischal  of  Scotland^^. 
and  had  issue.  He  was  chaplain  to  John  Earl  of  Middleton,  commissi  ^ner  to  the 
first  Parliament  after  the  Restoration  of  King  Charles  II.  and  both  he  and  his  bro- 
ther Mr  James  had  the  honour  to  preach  several  times  before  that  great  senate. 
Mr  William's  fourth  son  was  Mr  Patrick,  who  succeeded  his  father  as  mmister  of 
Boyndie  :  (His  said  father  and  his  grandfather  Mr  William  Chalmers,  minister  at 
Skene,  are  subscribers  to  the  address  of  the  synod  of  Aberdeen  to  his  majesty's 
high  commissioner.)  This  Mr  Patrick  married  Anne,  daughter  of  James  Ogiivie 
of  Raggell  in  the  same  parish,  by  whom  two  sons  and  a  daughter ;  the  eldest,  Mr 
James,  is  present  rector  of  Lamarsh  and  Wickham,  St  Paids,  both  in  the  county  of 
Essex  in  England.  He  married  first  Mary,  daughter  of  Peter  Bulteel,  merchant 
of  London,  gentleman,  and  widow  of  Richard  Daniel  of  Colchester,  and,  secondly, 
Susanna,  eldest  daughter  of  John  Edwards,  Esq.  of  Walthamhall  in  Essex,  by 
whom  a  son,  Henry,  and  a  girl,  Rachel  Katharine,  both  promising  children.  Mr 
Patrick's  second  son  died  a  youth  at  the  Marischal  College  of  New  Aberdeen ;  and 
his  daughter  was  married  to  George  Ogiivie  of  Newrain. 

Mr  James  Chalmers,  second  son  to  Mr  William,  Minister  at  Boyndie,  was  first 
one  of  the  professors  of  philosophy  in  the  Marischal  College  of  New  Aberdeen  ;  in 
which  employ  he  acquitted  himself  both  with  honour  and  applause;  and  here,  in  this 
station  he  was  about  anno  1650,  when  King  Charles  11.  made  his  first  attempt  to. 
recover  his  just  rights  to  the  government  of  these  kingdoms,  for  he  being  a  man 
both  of  great  learning  and  good  address,  he  employed  his  utmost  endeavours  in 
doing  his  majesty  considerable  service  in  that  critical  juncture  of  affairs,  God  having 
blessed  him  with  a  particular  dexterity  in  managing  negotiations  of  such  importance  j 
and  of  his  indefatigable  industry  herein,  and  unshaken  loyalty,  this  king  was  so 
sensible,  that  he  distinguished  him  upon  all  occasions,  while  at  Aberdeen,  with  par- 
ticular marks  of  honour,  and  especially  once,  when  he  v.aited  on  his  majesty,  as 
soon  as  he  entered  into  his  presence,  he  was  received  with  these  words,  (not  usual 
from  a  sovereign  to  a  subject)  God  save  you  Mr  Chalmers,  which  the  king  expres- 
sed in  the  audience  of  many  then  present.  And  some  years  after,  entering  into 
holy  orders,  he,  for  his  bright  parts,  was  presented  to  the  kirk  of  New  Machar, 
alias  New  Kirk,  within  seven  miles  of  Aberdeen,  but  not  continuing  there  long, 
he  was  translated  afterwards  to  the  Kirk  of  Cullen,  (where  his  nephew,  Mr  James 
Chalmers,  was  afterwards  incumbent.)  During  his  ministry  here,  preaching  once 
at  his  kirk  on  Jotham's  parable,  Judges,  chap.  9th,  in  the  time  of  Cromwell's 
usurpation,  where  was  a  company  of  his  soldiers  then  quartered  in  that  town,  ia 
his  discourse  on  the  same,  he  gave  them  so  great  offence  that  they  carried  him  pri- 
soner to  Elgin,  where  he  continued  confined  some  time,  till  allowed  to  return 
again  to  his  charge  at  Cullen,  whereof  he  was  in  actual  possession  at  the  Restora- 
tion ;  for  1  find  him  one  of  the  subscribers  (then  designed  minister  of  Cullen)  to 
the  humble  address  of  the  Synod  of  Aberdeen  to  his  Majesty's  High  Commissioner 
John  Earl  of  Middleton,  against  the  murder  of  King  Charles  I.,  subjects  taking  up 
arms  against  the  supreme  magistrate,  delivering  up  the  King  at  Newcastle,  act  of 
the  West  Kirk,  and  other  rebellious  practices;  which  address  is  dated  at  the  King's 
College  of  Aberdeen  the  i8th  April  1661  ;  but,  after  episcopacy  was  estabhshed 
in  Scotland  in  the  year  1662,  I  find  he  was  advanced  to  the  kirk  of  Dumfries,  and 
for  confirmation  hereof,  and  the  passages  above,  there  is  an  act  of  the  Lords  of 
Secret  Council  in  his  favour,  dated  nth  of  December  1662,  and  registrate  in  their 
council  books,  viz.  "  The  Lords  of  Secret  Council  taking  to  their  consideration, 
"  that  Mr  James  Chalmers,  late  Minister  at  Cullen  of  Boyne,  and  now  Minister 
"  at  Dumfries,  has  been  at  a  great  deal  of  charges  and  pains  in  pursuance  of  his 
"  Majesty's  interest  and  government,  both  in  church  and  state,  have  therefore  or- 
"  dained,  and  by  these  presents  ordain,  that  the  present  year's  stipend,  anno  1662, 
"  due  to  the  late  minister  of  Dumfries,  be  paid  to  the  said  Mr  James  Chalmers, 
"  and  that  the  heritors,  feuars,  farmers,  tenants,  possessors,  and  others  liable,  make 
"  ready  and  thankful  payment  of  the  same  to  him,  or  any  having  his  order;  and, 
"  if  need  be,  ordain  letters  of  horning  to  pass  thereupon  as  effeirs  :  And  this  is 
"  without  prejudice  to  the  said  Mr  James  of  the  said  year's  stipend  1662,  due  to 
"  him  from  the  parish  of  Cullen."  Mr  James  was  some  years  after  this  advanced 
to-  the  parsonage  of  Paisley  in  Renfrewshire ;  and  so  much  was  he  in  the  estima- 


APPENDIX.  irgi. 

«on  of  the  said  King  Charles,  that  he  was  nominated  by  him  to  the  bishoprick  of 
Orkney,  and  the  conge  d'elire  sent  down  from  court,  in  order  to  his  election,  buft 
dying  at  Edinburgh  before  he  could  be  consecrated,  that  See  was  tilled  with  another 
bishop:  He  lies  buried  in  the  Chalmers's  tomb  in  the  Grayfriers  Church-yard  there; 
he  married  first  a  daughter  of  Mr  William  Scroggy,  bishop  of  Argyle  ;  and,  se» 
condly,  Elizabeth,  sister  to  Robert  Petrie  of  Portlethin  near  Aberdeen,  who  wa* 
Provost  of  that  city  from  the  year  1664  to  1671,  by  whom  two  sons,  first,  Mc 
James,  Minister  of  Kirkpatrick-Fleming,  the  second.  Captain  Charles. 

Captain  Charles  Chalmers,  his  second  son,  possessed  the  estate  of  Portleth  a, 
which  belonged  to  his  uncle  Provost  Petrie  ;  but  afterwards  he  sold  the  ame  o 
Thomson,  now  of  Portlethin.  He  was  admitted  writer  to  the  signet  i6th  Octobes 
1704;  but  leaving  that  employment,  betook  himself  to  the  military,  and  was  for 
sometime  a  Captain  in  the  .Scots  Guards,  which  commission  he  sold  1714  ;  but  be- 
ing engaged  afterwards  in  the  memorable  year  1715  to  employ  his  valour  at  the 
battle  of  ShenfTmuir,  was  there  killed,  and  lies  buried  at  Dumblane  in  the  bury- 
ing place  of  Mr  Chisholm  of  Cromlicks,  within  the  church  there.  He  married  first 
Jean,  daughter  of  Alexander  Boog  of  Bumhouses  in  Berwickshire,  by  whom  two 
sons,  Roderick,  of  whom  after,  and  James,  picture-drawer  ;  which  family  of  Boog 
of  Burnhouses  is  of  good  antiquity  in  the  said  shire,  as  is  clear  from  the  authentic 
documents  following ;  for  I  find  in  the  public  registers,  a  charter  granted  by  King 
James  IV.  in  favours  of  John  Boog  of  Burnhouses  of  the  said  lands  of  Burnhouses, 
Uthcrstone,  Oxendean,  Harcarse,  Risybrigs,  lying  in  the  earldom  of  iMarch  and 
shire  of  Berwick,  dated  at  Edinburgh  the  23d  January  1490,  Anno  Regni  2,tio;  there 
is  also  another  charter  by  the  said  king,  in  favour  of  Archibald  Boog  his  son,  of 
the  foresaid  haill  lands,  confirming  the  atove  charter  granted  to  his  father,  which 
is  dated  6th  May  1491:  This  Archibald's  son  was  John  Boog  of  Burnhouses,  who 
had  a  son  John,  as  is  instructed  by  the  special  retour  of  John  Boog  as  heir  to  John 
Boog  his  father,  of  the  whole  foresaid  lands.  This  is  dated  the  iSth  January  1546; 
and  which  John  was  grandfather  to  the  above  Alexander  Boog,  whose  daughter 
married  Captain  Chalmers  ;  Captain  Charles  married,  secondly,  Helen,  daughter 
of  Alexander  Young.  Bishop  of  Edinburgh,  and  by  her  had  issue  also. 

Roderick  Chalmers,  Captain  Charles's  eldest  son,  is  present  Ross-Herald,  and 
herald-painter  in  Edinburgh  ;  and  hath  married  Mary,  only  child  of  George  Wil- 
son, gentleman,  by  whom  several  sons,  viz.  Charles,  George,  James,  Roderick, 
and  Alexander. 


SIBBALD  OF  Balgonie,  and  LUNDIN  or  Balgonie,  now  represented 
LUNDIN  OF  Drum. 


FROM  the  documents  we  have  seen,  and  herewith  produced,  we  are  of  opinion 
that  the  Sibbalds  of  Balgonie  is  one  of  the  ancientest  as  well  as  one  of  the  best  allied 
families  in  the  kingdom.  Donatus  or  Duncanus  Sibbahl  seems  then  to  be  settled  in  the 
county  of  Fife,  and  doubtless  is  proprietor  of  the  lands  of  Balgonie  ;  for  we  find 
him  witness  to  that  charter  by  Rogerus  de  ^tincy  Com:-  de  IVinton,  i.  e.  Winchester 
in  England,  to  Seyer  de  Seton,  one  of  the  progenitors  of  the  Earl  of  Winton.  The 
charter  is  without  date,  a  thing  very  usual  at  that  time,  but  must  be  before  the 
1246,  that  the  Earl  of  Winchester  died.  The  same  Duncanus  Sibbald,  in  the 
1251,  is  mentioned  in  a  bull  of  Pope  Innocent  IV.  referring  the  cognizance  of  a 
complaint  made  to  his  Holiness  by  the  priory  of  St  Andrews,  that  the  Bishop  of  St 
Andrews  had  introduced  into  one  of  the  churches,  that  of  right  belonged  to  them, 
the  Order  of  the  Blessed  Trinity,  for  the  redemption  of  captives.  The  same  Dona- 
tus Sibbald  is  witness  to  another  charter  by  the  forenamed  Rogerus-  de  ^lincy  Conjla- 
bularius  Scotia,  Adamo  de  Seton,  de  Marit^igio  hceredis  Allani  del  Fauside.  Then  we 
meet  with  Walterus  Sibbald,  one  of  the  ancestors  of  the  house  of  Balgonie,  whose 
son  David,  called  ^//«j-  PValteri  Sibbald,  who  had  a  charter  from  Malcolm  Earl  of 
Fife,  which  must  be  before  1256  that  the  granter  died.  I  have  seen  a  charter  in 
I 


123.  APPENDIX. 

the  custody  of  the  Earl  of  Vfemyss,  to  Sir  John  Wemyss,  Knight,  of  the  lands  oi 
Camburn,  granted  by  Robert  E:irl  of  Fife  and  iVlonteith  in  the  1374,  to  winch, 
among  other  witnesses,  there  is  dominus  Johannes  Sibhnld,  7niles.  And  in  another 
charter  by  Isabel  Countess  of  Fife,  disponing  the  whole  earldom  of  F"ife  to  Robert 
Earl  of  Monteith  in  the  1371  ;  the.  original  charter  of  this  I  have  seen,  dated  the 
penult  of  March  1371. 

There  is  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal  by  Robert  Duke  of  Albany,  Earl  of 
Fife  and  Monteith,  Governor  of  Scotland,  Johnnni  Sibbald  de  Ba/^ony,  of  the  lands 
of  Rossie  ;  he  had  Sir  Andrew  Sibbald  of  Balgonie  his  heir  and  successor,  and  a 
daughter  Elizabeth,  who  was  married  to  George  Earl  of  Angus:  By  this  lady  he 
had  Archibald,  the  heir  of  that  illustrious  house,  whose  grandson  and  successor,  Ar- 
chibald Earl  of  Angus,  by  Margaret  Q_iieen  Dowager  of  Scotland,  daughter  of 
Henry  VII.  of  England,  h-  had  gne  daughter,  the  Lady  Margaret  Douglas,  who 
who  was  married  to  Matthew  Earl  of  Lennox,  whose  eldest  son,  Henry  Lord  Darn- 
ly.  Earl  of  Ross,  and  Duke  of  Albany,  married  Mary  Q^iieen  of  Scotland,  who 
was  declared  King  of  Scotland,  wliose  only  child  was  James  VL  of  Scotland,  the 
first  monarch  of  Great  Brirain-:  So  that  of  this  ancient  family  of  Sibbald  of  Bal- 
gonie, not  only  the  royal  family  of  Great  Britain  are  descended,  but  most  of  all 
the  crowned  heads  in  Europe,  who  have  intermarried  with  that  serene  house. 

Sir  Andrew  Sibbald  of  Balgonie,  son  and  heir  of  Sir  John  Sibbald  aforesaid, 
executed  the  office  of  High-ShenH' of  the  county  of  Fife,  in  the  1457,  as  appears 
from  Rymcr,  and  he  is  designed  lUcecomes  de  Fife,  in  the  year  1466,  in  the  re- 
cords of  Parliament.  He  left  one  daughter,  liis  heir,  Helen,  who  married  Robert 
Lundin,  second  son  to  Sir  John  Lundin  of  that  Ilk,  by  Dame  Isabel  Wemyss  his 
•wife,  of  the  House  of  Wemyss  in  Fifeshire,  whose  ancestor  of  the  House  of  Lundin, 
from  many  authentic  deeds  still  extant,  was  IVilliam  de  Lundin,  as  he  is  called, 
son-natural  to  King  William  of  Scotland,  commonly  called  the  Lion,  and  married 
the  heiress  of  the  ancient  family  of  Lundin,  or  Lundoniis,  of  which  surname  and 
family  was  Thomas  de  Lundoniis  Hostiarius  Scotia,  and  Comes  Athoha,  in  the  reign 
of  Alexander  II.  anno  1246.  So  by  marriage  of  the  heir-female  of  Sibbald  of 
Balgonie,  that  estate  came  to  be  transferred  to  the  Lundins;  and  upon  that  ac- 
count the  family  of  Lundin  of  Balgonie  quartered  the  coat  of  Sibbald  with  their 
paternal  arms,  and  is  still  the  same  way  carried  by  Lundin  of  Drum,  the  heir- 
male  and  representative  of  the  House  of  Balgonie.  Robert  Lundin  of  Balgonie, 
and  Helen  Sibbald,  aforesaid,  his  wife,  heiress  of  Balgonie,  had  a  son,  Sir  Robert 
Lundin  of  Balgonie,  who  was  in  high  favour  with  King  James  IV.;  and  being  a 
gentleman  of  parts  and  reputation  for  integrity,  he  was  preferred  to  be  Lord  High 
Treasurer  of  Scotland,  upon  the  removal  of  the  Abbot  of  Paisley,  Dr  George 
Shaw,  from  the  office,  anno  ii,C)-i,  and  he  held  the  Treasurer's  place  for  the  space 
of  five  years,  even  till  his  death  in  the  1502,  as  from  authentic  documents  1  have 
seen  and  perused.  His  wife  was  a  daughter  of  the  Lord  Lindsay  of  Byres,  the 
ancestor  of  the  present  Earl  of  Crawford,  as  from  the  MS.  History  of  that  noble 
family  I  have  seen,  by  whom  he  had  a  son,  Andrew  Lundin  of  Balgonie,  and  two 
daughters,  Elizabeth,  who  was  married  to  John  Lord  Lindsay,  of  whom  the  House 
of  Crawford  and  Lindsay  are  descended,  and  Euphame  to  William  Melville  of 
Raith,  and^  had  issue,  of  whom,  from  authentic  documents  I  have  seen,  is  the  Eari 
of  Melville  and  Leven  descended. 

Andrev/  Lundin,  the  third  of  the  line  of  the  Lundins  of  Balgonie,  was,  from  the 
Records  of  Parliament  I  have  seen,  Sherift"  of  Fifeshire  in  the  1506,  and,  for  what 
I  see,  held  the  office  till  the  15 19  it  was  given  to  the  Lord  Lindsay.  Ihe  writs  of 
the  family  of  Balgonie  being  now  in  other  hands,  we  have  no  document  to  vouch 
to  whom  this  gentleman,  Andrew  Lundin  of  Balgonie,  was  married,  but  he  had  his 
son  and  successor,  vix. 

James  Lundin  of  Balgonie.  This  is  vouched  from  a  deed  I  have  seen  granted  by 
Andrew  Lumisden,  son  to  Thomas  Lumisden  of  Conland,  of  the  lands  ot  Wester- 
Conland,  to  and  in  favours  of  James  Lundin  of  Balgonie,  anno  1528.  He  was  suc- 
ceeded by  his  son  and  heir 

Robert  Lundin  of  Balgonie,  who  added  to  his  own  estate,  which  was  then  one 
of  the  greatest  in  the  shire  of  File,  the  lands  and  barony  of  Conland,  by  the  mar- 
liage  of  Margajet   Lumisden,   the   heiress   tbeieof,  whose  ancestor,  Johannes  dt 


APPENDIX.  izi 

Lumsden,  is  llcecomes  ck  Fife,  as  fiom  an  authentic  deed  I  have  seen  in  the  Re- 
gister in  the  time  of  the  regency  of  Robert  Dukeof  Albany ;  and,  it  is  remarkable, 
the  Duke  Regent,  who  was  the  second  son  of  King  Robert  II.  calls  this  Johannes 
Lumsden,  consanguineus  situs.  From  that  time  the  f  miily  continued  to  flourish  till 
the  time  of  Queen  Mary,  that  Andrew  Lumisden,  son  and  heir  of  Thomas  Lumis- 
den  of  Coniand,  left  only  one  daughter,  his  heir,  Margaret,  whc3,  as  hath  been 
said,  was  married  to  Robert  Lundm  of  Balgonie,  for  there  is  a  sasine  1  have  pe- 
rused of  the  barony  of  Coniand,  in  favour  of  this  Robert  Lundin  of  Balgonie,  in 
the  year  1544.  Further,  there  was  another  voucher  in  my  hand  at  the  drawing  of 
this  memorial,  a  renunciation  by  Mr  Thomas  Lumisden  of  the  lauds  of  VVescer- 
Conland,  in  favour  of  an  honourable  lady,  Margaret  Lumisden,  spouse  to  Robert 
Lundin  of  Balgonie,  ann-)  1564.  By  this  lady  he  had  issue,  Robert,  his  successor 
in  the  barony  of  Balgonie,  James,  who  was  provided  to  the  lands  of  C^onland,  but 
he  died  without  issue,  and  the  lands  of  Coniand  came  to  a  third  brother,  Andrew 
Lundin,  the  ancestor  of  Michael  Lundin  of  Drum,  by  whom  the  male  heir  of  this 
ancient  family  was  preserved  :  He  had  also  a  daughter,  Margaret,  who  was  first 
married  to  George  Halket  of  Pitferran,  and  again  to  Mr  William  Lundin  of  that 
Ilk,  and  had  issue,  as  is  evident  from  vouchers  presently  in  my  hands. 

R0BEH.T  Lundin,  son  and  heir  to  the  foresaid  Robert,  and  the  sixth  of  the  line 
in  succession  of  the  Lundins  of  the  House  of  Balgonie,  succeeded  his  father.  I 
have  seen  him  designed  witness  to  a  contract  of  marriage  betwixt  Sir  Michael  Bal- 
four of  Burleigh,  and  Margaret,  daughter  of  Mr  William  Lundin  of  that  Ilk,  dated 
the  I2th  of  July  1591  ;  he  was  afterward  the  first  Lord  Balfour  of  Burleigh.  This 
Robert  Lundin  of  Balgonie  manned  Margaret,  daughter  of  David  Boswell  of  Bal- 
muto,  as  from  a  voucher  I  have  seen,  and  had  a  son  in  whom  the  family  failed, 
and  a  daughter,  Agnes,  who  was  married  to  William  Graham  of  Claverhouse, 
great-grandmother  to  Lieutenant-General  John  Graham  of  Claverhouse,  thereafter 
Viscount  of  Dundee. 

Robert  Lundin  of  Balgonie,  son  and  heir  to  the  former  Robert,  was  the  last  of 
the  House  of  Balgonie,  for  he  had  no  male  issue,  and  he  alienated  his  estate  to 
Alexander  the  first  Earl  of  Leven,  who  was  designed  of  Balgonie,  till  he  was  raised 
to  the  honour  of  an  earl  in  the  year  1640.  The  family  of  Balgonie  thus  failing  in 
the  lineal  succession,  the  representation  of  this  ancient  House  comes  to  Lundin  of 
Drum,  as  we  have  said.  The  predecessor  was  Andrew  Lundin,  younger  son  to- 
Robert  Lundin  of  Balgonie,  by  Margaret  his  wife,  daughter  and  heir  of  Andrew 
Lumisden  of  Coniand  ;  to  vouch  this  there  is  a  sasine  1  have  perused  of  the  lands, 
of  Coniand  by  Robert  Lundin  of  Balgonie,  Margaret  Lumisden  his  wife,  in  favour 
of  Andrew  Lundin  their  son,  in  the  1578.  This  gentleman,  Andrew  Lundin  of 
Coniand,  was  umch  with  King  James  VI.  and  in  a  good  degree  of  favour.  He 
went  up  to  England  with  the  king,  when  he  succeeded  to  that  crown,  on  the  de- 
cease of  Queen  Elizabeth,  anno  1603,  where  he  speht  most  of  his  own  estate,  ai 
well  as  what  he  had  by  the  king's  bounty,  so  that  the  barony  of  Coniand  was  ap- 
prised from  him  by  Sir  Michael  Arnot  of  that  Ilk.  He  married  Elizabeth  Brown, 
daughter  to  the  Laird  of  Fordel,  whose  mother  was  a  daughter  of  Sir  David  Bos- 
v/ell  of  Balmuto,  by  whom  he  had  David  his  eldest  son,  and  Andre^v  Lundin  of 
Kirny,  the  second  son. 

Which  David  went  into  the  army  in  the  time  of  the  civil  war,  and  being  a  gen- 
tleman of  courage,  prudence  and  industry,  he  rose  to  be  a  captain;  and  withal, 
being  a  frugal  man,  he  redeemed  the  lands  of  Over  and  Nether-Drums,  a  part  of 
the  estate  that  his  father  had  wadset  and  mortgaged  ;  and  upon  that  he  took  the 
title  and  designation  of  Lundin  of  Drum:  and  he  also  purchased  a  fourth  part  of 
the  lands  of  Freuchy,  and  he  got  also  a  considerable  estate  in  and  about  Falkland, 
by  the  marriage  of  Elizabeth,  daughter  and  heir  of  George  Paterson,  a  grandson  of 
the  House  of  Dunmore  in  Fife;  by  her  he  had  issue,  George,  his  successor;  Ro- 
bert, the  second  son,  was  first  a  captain  in  the  Earl  of  Dumbarton's  regiment,  and 
then,  by  his  merit,  he  rose  gradually  till  he  got  the  command  of  a  regiment  in  the 
reign  of  King  William,  and  was  sometime  Governor  of  Londonderry  in  Ireland, 
anno  1689:  and  though  he  fell  under  some  suspicion,  as  favouring  the  giving  the 
town  to  King  James,  while  his  army  lay  before  it,  yet  it  was  without  ground,  and 
he  had  his  conduct  approver!  by  the  English  Parliament,  and  was  afterwards,  in 

Vol.  II.  5  P 


J2  2  APPENDIX. 

the  reign  of  Queen  Anne,  commissary-general  in  the  army,  and  was  at  the  battle  ot 
Almanza  in  Spain,  and  died  about  the  end  of  her  majesty's  reign;  he  left  a  son 
who  is  at  present  a  captain  in  the  army. 

George  Lundin  of  Drum,  the  next  of  the  line,  married  Isabel  Arnot,  daughter 
of  Sir  Michuel  Arnot  of  that  Ilk,  baronet,  and  had  issue  by  her,  John,  his  eldest 
son,  who,  after  he  had  passed  the  course  of  his  studies  at  the  university  of  St  An- 
drews, went  into  the  army,  and  had  a  commission  in  the  Earl  of  Dumbarton's 
regiment,  and  was  slain  at  Sedgemoor  in  the  engagement  against  the  Duke  of 
Monmouth ;  a  very  hopeful  as  well  as  a  rising  young  man,  but  was  snatched  away  in 
bis  twenty-fifth  year,  universally  regretted  by  all  who  knew  him,  or  heard  his 
character;  Michael,  the  second  son,  who  became  his  father's  heir,  and  is  the  present 
Laird  of  JDrum;  the  third  son,  David,  who  was  a  captain  in  the  war  in  Ireland, 
and  died  with  the  character  of  a  very  brave  man. 

Michael  Lundiv,  now  of  Drum,  married  Sophia,  daughter  and  co-heiress  of 
James  Lundin  of  Drum,  elder,  and  lias  James,  his  son  and  apparent  heir. 

The  armorial  bearing  of  this  family  of  Lundin  of  Drum,  as  representing  the 
Lundins  of  Balgonie  as  heir-male,  and  the  ancient  family  of  Sibbald  of  Balgouie  as 
heir  of  line,  is,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  ardent,  a  cross  moline  ^ules,  by  the  sur- 
name of  Sibbald ;  second  and  third,  argent  and  gules,  in  place  of  six  argents  and 
gules,  on  a  bend  of  the  last  three  escutcheons  of  the  first;  crest,  a  cross  moline  gules: 
motto,  Justitia. 


ABERCROMBY  of  Birkenbog. 


THE  surname  of  Abercromby,  like  others  of  great  antiquity,  is  local,  taken  from 
the  lands  of  Abercromby,  in  the  county  of  Fife,  which  was  the  ancient  possession 
of  this  family.  The  Abercrombies  of  that  Ilk  were  very  considerable  gentlemen. 
Thomas  Abercromby  of  that  Ilk,  in  the  reign  of  King  James  II.  was  one  of  the  Lords 
of  Session,  or  what  at  that  time  was  a  committee  of  Parliament,  who  were  from 
one  Session  to  another  appointed  for  the  administration  of  justice,  anno  1457.  He 
left  a  son,  Thomas,  his  successor  in  the  barony  of  Abercromby,  and  a  daughter, 
Margaret,  who  was  married  to  Maule  of  Panmure.  And  from  this  Thomas  the  line 
of  the  family  continued  till  the  reign  of  King  Charles  I.  anno  1649,  that  Thomas 
Abercromby  sold  the  barony  of  Abercromby  to  Sir  James  Sandilands  of  St  Monance, 
who  was  created  Lord  Abercromby  in  the  year  1647. 

The  most  ancient  cadet  of  this  family  of  Abercromby  of  that  Ilk,  was  the  Aber- 
crombies of  Birkenbog,  in  the  shire  of  Banff,  whose  predecessor  was  Humphredus  de 
Abercromby,  a  son  of  the  House  of  Abercromby,  who  obtained  a  charter  and  grant 
from  King  Robert  the  Bruce,  of  the  lands  of  Harthill  and  Ardun  pro  homagio  13 
servitio  suo,  as  the  charter  bears,  which  is  still  extant  in  the  custody  of  Sir  James 
A,bercromby  of  Birkenbog,  baronet.  It  is  without  date,  but  appears  to  have  been 
about  1315,  the  7th  year  of  the  king's  reign,  immediately  after  the  battle  of  Ban- 
nockburn,  when  that  immortal  monarch  began  to  reward  the  loyalty  and  valour  of 
such  of  his  subjects  as  had  served  him  hitherto  with  merit  and  fidelity.  This 
Humphrey  Abercromby  of  Harthill  was  succeeded  by  Alexander  de  Abercromby, 
who  acquires  from  Patricius  Hay,  dimidiam  partem  terra:  de  Ardhuienyn,  to  be  held 
of  him  and  his  heirs  in  feudo  13  hiBreditate'r.  to  the  deed  the  granter's  seal  is  ap- 
pended, and  the  witnesses  are  Domino  JVillielmo  Episcopo  Aberdonensi,  Domino  David 
Fleming,  militi,  Jobanne  de  Periston.  The  charter  is  granted  in  the  reign  of  King 
David  II.  To  this  Alexander  succeededanother  Alexander  de  Abercromby,  designed  of 
Pitmithen;  and  to  him  succeeded  his  son  and  heir  Alexander  Abercromby  of  Pit- 
mithen,  as  is  vouched  by  a  precept  out  of  the  Cliancery  by  King  James  III.  for 
investing  the  said  Alexander  in  the  lands  of  Harthill,  Pitmithen,  Pitmachy,  Hal- 
ton  and  Ardoun,  in  Comitatu  de  Garioch.  The  instrument  of  sasine  is  dated  the 
4th  of  August  1484,  the  35th  year  of  the  king's  reign.  Then  succeeded  James  Aber- 


APPENDIX.  12  i 

cromby  of  Ley  and  Birkenbog,  who  is  also  designed  of  Pitmithen.  He  was  mar- 
ried to  Margaret  Ogilvie,  daughter  of  Sir  James  Ogilvie  of  Findlater  and  Deskford, 
and  was  slain  with  King  James  IV.  at  the  battle  of  Flodden.  He  was  succeeded 
by  George  Abercromby  of  Pitmithen,  his  son,  who,  by  Christian  his  wife,  a  daugh- 
ter of Barclay,  of  the  Barclays  of  Gartlay,   had  James  his  son  and  heir, 

who  succeeded  him,  and  married  Marjory  Hay,  a  daughter  to  William  Earl  of  Errol. 
Alexander  Abercromby  succeeded  to  James,  and  married  Margaret,  daughter  of 
Leslie  of  Pitcaple,  who  was  again  succeeded  by  Alexander  his  son,  who  married 
Margaret  Leslie,  daughter  of  William  Leslie  of  Balquhain,  by  whom  he  liad  James 
Abercromby  of  Birkenbog,  and  Alexander,  who  was  Laird  of  P'itternier,  father  of 
Alexander  Abercromby  of  Fitternier,  who,  by  Jean  his  wife,  daughter  of  John 
Seaton  of  Newark,  had  Francis  Abercromby  of  Fitternier,  who  was  by  King- 
James  VIL  created  Lord  Glassford  for  life,  in  regard  that  liis  children  by  his  wife, 
Anne  Baroness  of  Semple,  were  to  succeed  to  the  honours  of  Lord  Scniple;  of 
which  marriage  is  descended  the  present  Hugh  Lord  Semple.  The  Lord  Glassford 
had  a  younger  brother,  Patrick  Abercromby,  M.  D.  who  wrote  the  Lives  of  the 
Scots  Warriors,  in  two  volumes,  with  great  exactness  and  ingenuity.  The  above 
James  Abercromby  of  Birkenbog  was  succeeded  by  Alexander  Abercromby  of 
Birkenbog,  who  was  falconer  to  King  Charles  L  He  married  Elizabeth  Beaton, 
daughter  to  Beaton  of  Balfour,  by  whom  he  had  Sir  Alexander  Abercromby,  ba- 
ronet, John  Abercromby  of  Glasshaugh,  Walter  Abercromby  of  Braconhills.  Sir 
Alexander  married,  first,  Jean  Urquhart,  of  the  family  of  Urquhart  of  Cro- 
marty, and  after  her  Jean  Sutherland,  of  the  family  of  Kilminity;  and,  lastly, 
Elizabeth  Baird,  daughter  to  Sir  James  Baird  of  Auchmeddan,  chief  of  that  name; 
by  which  last  lady  he  had  Sir  James  Abercromby  of  Birkenbog,  and  Alexander 
Abercromby  of  Tullibody,  who  succeeded  to  his  cousin  George  Abercromby  of 
Skeith  (who  was  an  ancient  cadet  of  the  family  of  Birkenbog)  in  the  lands  of 
Tilhbody. 


Of  the  Family  of  MELDRUM. 


THE  oldest  writs  of  this  family  being  lost,  it  cannot  be  condescended  on  at  what 
particular  time  it  had  its  rise  ;  but  Hector  Boece  in  his  History  mentions  the  sur- 
name of  Meldrum,  amongst  others,  to  have  begun  in  the  reign  of  King  Malcolm 
Canmore  ;  and  it  is  not  improbable  it  has  been  taken  from  the  name  of  the  lands, 
as  was  usual  at  that  time. 

We  meet  with  severals  of  this  name  in  the  charters  of  King  William  the  Lion, 
and  of  Alexander  the  H.  and  IIL  There  is  a  perambulation  of  the  lands  of  Cleish 
in  Fife,  per  Micbaelem  de  Montealto  iS  Philippum  de  Melgedrum,  tunc  Justiciarios 
Scotia,  Anno  1252,  {penes  Lindsay  of  Dowhill),  and  Alexander  de  Meldrum  is 
witness  in  the  resignation  of  the  lands  of  Beethwald  by  John  de  Strathern,  anno 
1278.  (See  First  Vol.  of  this  Heraldry,  page  331.)  We  find  also  in  Rymer's 
Fcedera  Anglice,  Vol.  V.  pages  618,  625,  and  657,  several  letters  of  safe  conduct, 
granted  by  Edward  the  HI.  King  of  England,  in  the  years  1348  and  1349,  to  the 
ambassadors  of  Scotland,  who  came  to  treat  about  the  redemption  of  King  David 
Bruce,  then  a  prisoner  in  England,  and  IMUielmus  de  Meldrutn  is  named  as  one  of 
the  said  ambassadors. 

The  said  William  Meldrum  got  a  charter  from  King  David  Bruce  of  the 
lands  and  lordship  of  Meldrum,  dated  at  Dumbritton  the  loth  day  of  October' 
1353,  and  his  descendants  in  the  male  line  continued  to  enjoy  the  said  estate  until 
the  reign  of  King  James  I.  when  William  Meldrum  of  that  Ilk  dying,  left  by 
Elizabeth  his  wife,  daughter  of  the  Earl  of  Sutherland,  only  one  daughter  named 
EUzabeth,  who  was  his  successor,  and  married  William  Seaton,  brother  to  Alexan- 
der fijTst  Earl  of  Huntly. 

3. 


124 


APPENDIX. 


The  said  William  Seaton  of  Meldrum  was  killed  in  the  king's  service  at  the 
battle  of  Brechin,  fought  betwixt  his  brother  the  Earl  of  Huntly  and  the  Earl  of 
Crawford,  May  i8.  1452,  and  his  son  Alexander  Seaton  was  served  heir  to  Eliza- 
betli  Meldrum  his  mother,  April  20th  1456. 

Alexander  Seaton  of  Meldrum  married  Murriel,  daughter  of  Sutherland  of 
Duffus,  ancestor  of  the  Lord  Duffus,  by  whom  he  had  a  son  named  William. 

William  Seaton  of  Meldrum  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  Leslie  of  Wardis, 
by  whom  he  had  a  son  named  Alexander. 

Alexander  Seaton  of  Meldrum  was  served  heir  to  his  grandfather  in  the  lands 
and  lordship  of  Meldrum,  as  then  called,  July  15.  151 2,  and  married  Agnes, 
daughter  of  Gordon  of  Haddo,  ancestor  of  the  Earl  of  Aberdeen,  by  whom  he  had 
William,  his  successor,  and  Alexander,  who  was  Chancellor  of  Aberdeen,  and 
Vicar  of  Bethelny.  He  married,  for  a  second  wife,  a  daughter  of  Leith  of  Barns, 
by  whom  he  had  Seaton  of  Blair. 

William  Seaton  of  Meldrum  was  served  heir  to  his  father  January  13.  1533, 
and  married  Janet,  daughter  to  Gordon  of  Lesmoir,  by  whom  he  had  Alexander 
his  successor,  John  Seaton  of  Lumphard,  and  William  Seaton  of  Slatie  ;  and  mar- 
rying afterwards  Margaret,  daughter  to  Innes  of  Leuchars,  he  had  by  her  Mr 
George  Seaton  of  Barra,  Chancellor  of  Aberdeen,  and  James  Seaton,  who  was  the 
first  of  the  family  of  Pitmedden,  now  represented  by  Sir  William  Seaton,  baronet. 
This  William  Seaton  of  Meldrum  granted  a  procuratory  of  resignation,  dated 
fanuary  24.  1533,  for  resigning  his  lands  in  the  king's  hands,  for  new  infeftment 
to  himself  and  Janet  Gordon  his  spouse,  and  the  heirs  procreate  betwixt  them ; 
which  failing,  to  his  nearest  lawful  heirs  and  assignees  whatsomever ;  and  upon 
this  resignation  charter  and  sasine  followed  :  also  the  said  WiUiam  Seaton  granted 
a  charter,  dated  January  19.  1556,  to  Alexander  his  eldest  son,  and  his  heirs  and 
assignees  whatsomever,  of  the  said  lands  and  barony,  to  be  holden  of  the 
king,  upon  which  a  charter  of  confirmation  and  infeftment  followed  ;  so,  it 
is  to  be  observed,  that  hitherto  the  succession  continued  settled  on  heirs  what- 
somever. 

Alexander  Seaton  of  Meldrum  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  Irvine  of  Drum, 
by  whom  he  had  one  son  named  Alexander,  and  afterwards  he  married  Jean,  daughter 
of  Abernethy  Lord  Salton,  and  had  two  sons,  John  and  William  ;  also  two  daugh- 
ters, Margaret  married  to  Chalmers  of  Balbithan,  and  Isabel  to  Erskine  of  Pitto- 
drie.  This  Alexander  Seaton  of  Meldrum  granted  a  charter,  dated  December  3. 
1584,  to  Alexander  his  eldest  son,  and  the  heirs-male  of  his  body  ;  which  failing, 
to  his  heirs-male  and  assignees  whatsomever,  of  his  said  lands  and  estate  of  Mel- 
drum, to  be  holden  of  the  king,  with  a  reservation  of  his  own  liferent  ;  and  there- 
upon a  charter  of  confirmation  under  the  Great  Seal  was  expede,  and  infeftment 
taken  ;  whereby  the  ordinary  course  of  succession  in  the  heirs  of  line  was  al- 
tered. . 

Alexander  Seaton,  younger  of  Meldrum,  married,  anno  1584,  Christian, 
daughter  of  Michael  Eraser  of  Stonnywood,  ancestor  of  the  Lord  Eraser,  and  dy- 
ing before  his  father,  anno  1590,  left  only  one  daughter,  named  Elizabeth,  who 
married,  anno  1610,  John  Urquhart  of  Craigfintry,  son  to  the  Laird  of  Cromarty, 
and  commonly  designed  Tutor  of  Cromarty,  by  whom  she  had  Patrick  Urquhart 
of  Lethinty,  Adam  Urquhart  of  Auchintoull,  Walter  Urquhart  of  Crombie,  James 
Urquhart  of  Old-Craig,  and  one  daughter  married  to  Eraser  of  Easter-Tyrie  ;  and 
after  the  death  of  the  Tutor  of  Cromarty,  the  said  Elizabeth  Seaton  married  Alex- 
ander Eraser  of  Philorth,  afterwards  Lord  Salton,  by  whom  she  had  Alexander, 
Master  of  Salton,  grandfather  to  the  present  Lord.  She  was  served  heir  in  gene- 
ral both  to  her  father  and  grandfather,  March  19.  1617;  but  the  succession  to 
the  estate  of  Meldrum,  devolved,  in  the  terms  of  the  last  settlement,  upon  her 
uncle  John  Seaton,  who  was  eldest  son  of  the  second  marriage,  to  Alexander  Sea- 
ton her  grandfather. 

John  Seaton  of  Meldrum  married  Lady  Grissel  Stewart,  daughter  of  the 
Earl  of  Athol,  but  died  without  issue,  anno  1619,  and  was  succeeded  by  his 
brother. 

WiLtiAM  Seaton  of  Meldrum  married  Anne,  daughter  of  Crichton  of  Fren- 
draught,  ancestor  of  the  Viscount  of  Frendraught,  but  had  no  issue ;  and  esteem- 


APPENDIX.  12^ 

mg  it  just  and  reasonable  that,  as  the  estate  of  Meldruni  came  to  the  name  of 
Seaton  by  a  marriage  with  the  heir-female  of  Meldrum  of  that  Ilk,  and  that  the 
course  of  succession  continued  settled  in  the  heirs  of  line  for  a  long  time,  it  should 
in  like  manner  descend  to  his  eldest  brother's  daughter  and  her  heirs,  rather  than 
go  to  an  heir-male  at  a  greater  distance  ;  and  therefore,  anno  16^5,  he  entailed  his 
estate,  failing  heirs  of  his  own  body,  to  his  grand-nephew  Patrick  Urquhart  of 
Lethinty,  eldest  son  of  the  Tutor  of  Cromarty,  by  Elizabeth  Seaton  his  niece  ;  and 
he  did  accordingly  succeed  thereto. 

Patrick.  Ui<.<^'har.t  of  Meldrum  was  born  anno  161 1  ;  he  liad  not  only  his 
house  of  Lethinty  plundered,  but  suffered  several  other  hardships  for  his  loyalty  to 
his  Majesty  King  Charles  I.  He  married  Margaret,  daughter  of  James  fust  Earl 
of  Airly,  by  whom  he  had  John,  who  died  unmarried,  Adam  liis  successor,  James 
Urquhart  of  Knockleith,  Dr  Patrick  Urquhart,  Professor  of  Medicine  in  the  King's 
College  of  Aberdeen,  and  Captain  Alexander  Urquhart,  who  was  killed  in  tlie 
king's  service  anno  16S5  ;  also  one  daughter,  Elizabeth,  married  to  Sir  George  Gor- 
don uf  Gight„and  afterwards  to  Major-General  Thomas  Buchan.  The  above- 
named  Lady  M&rgaret  Ogilvie  had  the  honour  to  save  her  brother's,  the  Lord 
Ogilvie's,  life,  who  made  his  escape  in  her  clothes  from  the  prison  at  St  An- 
drews, anno  1646,  the  very  night  before  he  was  to  have  been  executed  with 
Sir  Robert  Sputtiswood  and  others,  who  suffered  at  that  time  for  their  loy- 
alty. 

Adam  Urquhart  of  Meldrum  was  born  anno  1635,  and  in  his  younger  year<, 
wlien  his  eldest  brother  was  alive,  served  long  abroad  as  a  soldier,  and,  after  his 
return  to  his  own  country,  he  had  the  honour  to  serve  his  Majesty  King  Charles 
II.  as  Cornet,  and  then  as  Lieutenant  of  that  Independent  Troop  of  Horse  com- 
manded by  his  uncle  the  Earl  of  Airly  ;  and  was  thereafter  made  Captain  of  the 
said  troop  in  room  of  the  said  Earl,  in  which  station  he  continued  till  his  death, 
anno  1684.  He  married,  anno  1667,  Mary,  daughter  of  Lewis  Marquis  of  Huntly, 
and  sister  of  George  first  Duke  of  Gordon,  by  whom  he  had  John,  his  successor, 
James  Urquhart  of  Byth,  Adam  and  Lewis,  both  churchmen  in  France  ;  also  three 
daughters,  Mary,  a  nun  at  Dieppe  in  Normandy,  Elizabeth,  married  to  David  Ogil- 
vie of  Clova,  and  Anne,  married  in  France  to  Sir  Florence  O'Donogh  an  Irish  gen- 
tleman, and  an  officer  in  the  King  of  France's  Gens  d'Aims.  The  said  Lady 
Mary  Gordon,  after  Meldrum's  death,  married  James  Earl  of  Perth,  then  Lord 
High  Chancellor  of  Scotland,  and,  after  the  Revolution,  went  to  France  with  her 
husband,  where  she  lived  till  the  year  1726. 

John  Urqi^hart  of  Meldrum  married  Jean,  daughter  of  Sir  Hugh  Campbell  of 
Calder,  by  whom  he  had  Adam,  who  died  unmarried,  and  William  ;  also  four 
daughters,  Mary,  married  to  William  Menzies  of  Pitfoddels,  Jean,  to  Alexander 
Stewart  of  Auchluncart,  Elizabeth,  to  William  Forbes  of  Edinglassie ;  and  Anne, 
to  Charles  Gordon  of  Blelack.  He  died  anno  1726,  in  the  59th  year  of  his  age, 
and  was  succeeded  by  his  son. 

William  Urqithart  of  Meldrum  married  Mary,  daughter  of  Sir  William  Forbes 
of  Monymusk,  by  whom  he  has  several  children. 

The  arms  of  this  family,  as  matriculate  in  the  Lyon  Register,  anno  1673,  are 
thus  blazoned ;  two  coats  quarterly,  first  and  last  argent,  a  demi-otter  issuing  forth 
of  a  bar,  waved  sable,  crowned  or,  second  and  third  or,  three  crescents  within  a 
double  tressure,  counter-flowered  gules,  above  the  shield  and  helmet,  answerable  to 
the  degree,  mantled  gules,  doubled  argent  ;  next  is  placed  on  a  torse  or  wreath, 
for  a  cre't,  a  boar's  head  erased  or,  and,  for  a  motto,  on  an  escrol  above  the  crest, 
Ter  mare  \i!  terras. 

Vql.  U.  .5  (^ 


APPENDIX, 


SCOTT  OF  Balwyrie. 


I  SHALL  not  insist  in  giving  an  exact  genealogy  of  this  family,  though,  no. 
doubt,  among  the  ancientest  in  the  kingdom,  but  rather  choose  to  be  particular 
in  those  evidents  which  make  them  often  conspicuous  in  their  services  to  their 
country. 

Uchtredus  filhis  &o«,and  Herbertiis  Scotus,  are  mentioned  in  the  reign  of  David  L 
as  witnesses  in  the  cliarters  of  the  abbacies  of  Selkirk  and  Holyroodhouse  :  And 
though  these  persons  are  not  designed,  yet  it  is  certain,  from  the  following  evi- 
dents, they  were  of  his  family. 


Ex  Lib.  Dumfenn.  fol.  96..  verso, 

"  Cum  mota  esset  controversia  inter  Willum  Dei  Gratia  Abbatem  et  Conven- 
"  turn  de  Dumferlyn  ex  una  parte,  et  Ricardum  de  Balverii  ex  altera,  super  tota 
"  terra  de  Balverii  cum  pertinentiis  suis,  quam  idem  Abbas  et  Conventus  illicite 
"  alienatam  asserebant,  et  earn  revocare  nitebantur,  per  Hteras  Domini  Papae,  ad 
"  Abbatem  de  Lindovis  et  Scon,  spontanea  voluntate  renunciantes  omni  actioni 
«  super  ilhcita  alienatione,  &c.  concesserunt  eidem  Ricardo  et  haredibus  suis  in 
"  peipetuum  totam  dictam  terram  de  Balverii,  cum  suis  rectis  divisis  et  pertinen- 
"  tiis,  &-C.  et  cum  omnibus  aliis  libertatibus  quas  antecessores  sui  in  eadem  terra 
"  habuerunt."  The  date  of  this  writ  is  determined  by  that  of  the  Pope's  letters  ; 
for  it  is  expressly  marked,  "  Litera;  Gregorii  datae  Lateran,  6  Idus  Junii,  Pontifi- 
"  catus  anno  imo,  et  Domini  nostri  122,1. 


Ex  eodem  Lib.  Dumfermliensi,  Fol.  86.  reeto. 

"  Michael  Scotus  et  Margareta  ejus  sponsa,  omnibus,  &-c.  Noveritis  Universi- 
"  tas  vestra  nos,  Divinte  remunerationis  intuitu,  et  pro  salute  animarum  anteces- 
"  sorum  et  successorum  nostrorum,  cum  Duncani  nostri  hasredis,  dedisse  et  con- 
"  cessisse,  &-c.  Deo  et  Ecclesise  Trinitatis  de  Dumferlyn,  &.c.  totam  terram  de 
"  Gaskimeenimfin  juxta  Vueth,  cum  omnibus  assiamentis  ad  earn  pertinen- 
"  tibus,  &c." 

This  charter  is  ratified  by  Margaret  his  lady,  daughter  to  Duncan  de  Pyraes, 
and  all  of  them  confirmed  at  Scoon  by  King  Alexander,  22d  April  1231.  What 
I  remark  from  these  charters  is,  that  they  were  a  standing  family  at  that  time, 
and,  without  any  stretch,  may  be  supposed  to  have  existed  in  the  reign  of  Malcolm 
Canmore,  when  surnames  first  took  place. 

About  this  time  was  born  the  famous  Michael  Scott  of  Balwyrie,  whose  writ- 
ings to  this  day  sustain  their  character  ;  he  was  (says  Dr  Mackenzie,  Vol.  I.  of 
his  History  of  Scots  Writers)  one  of  the  greatest  philosophers  and  linguists  of  his 
age,  Symphorianus,  Camperius,  Roger  Bacon,  and  Cornelius  Agrippa,  praise 
him  for  his  knowledge  in  the  stars  and  physical  matters ;  but  his  too  great  curi- 
osity that  way  made  the  vulgar  look  on  him  as  a  magician,  though  it  is  observable 
in  all  his  writings,  none  speak  more  respectfully  of  God  and  religion  than  he 
does. 

His  son  dnd  successor.  Sir  Michael,  was  no  less  conspicuous  in  his  way  than  his 
father ;  he  is  one  of  the  Equites  Fifenses  Illiistres  sent  by  the  guardians  of  the 
kingdom  to  bring  home  Margaret  the  Maid  of  Norway. 

Edward  of  England  writes  in  his  favour  to  the  bishops  of  St  Andrews  and 
Glasgow,  &c.  the  foresaid  guardians,  to  grant  him  or  his  family,  when  it  should 
fall,  their  ward  and  marriage,  as  the  recompense  of  his  labour,  "  in  recompensa- 
"  tionem  laboris,  quern  Michael  Scotus,  pro  communi  utilitate  prsedicti  regni, 


APPENDIX.  127 

'  eundo  ad  partes  Norwagioe,  pro  filia  regis  Norwagia;  Domina  Scotiae  et  inde  in 
**  tenam  ScotiiE  conducenda,"  says  the  Record.  Feed.  AngUtr,  Tom.  II.  p.  533. 
Btichan.  Historia. 

He  IS  chosen  and  named,  per  Dominum  Joannem  de  Baliolo,  with  several  others, 
to  judge  in  the  controversy  about  the  succession  to  the  crown.      Ibidan,  Tom.  II. 

P-  553-  ,     . 

The  tamily  was  no  less  active  in  successive  reigns  ;  for  I  find  at  the  storming 
of  the  town  of  Berwick,  under  the  command  of  Thomas  Earl  of  Angus,  Sir 
Andrew  Scott  of  Bahvyrie,  with  five  gentlemen  of  note,  lost  their  lives.  Aber- 
cromby's  History,  Vol.  II.     Hector  Boet.  Book   15.     This  happened,  «««o  1355. 

^fi/io  1432,  Michael  Scott  of  Balwyrie  is  sent  as  hostage  ex  parte  Jucohi  regis y 
in  place  of  Robert  Logan,  and  on  that  account  obtains  the  King  of  England's  safe 
conduct.     Fad.  Angliae,  p.  510,  512. 

Anno  1 51 1,  Sir  William  Scott  of  Balwyrie  is  sent  ambassador  by  James  IV. 
to  Henry  Vill.  of  England,  along  with  Archibald  Earl  of  Argyle,  John  Lord 
Drummond,  Robert  Lauder  of  Bass,  John  Ramsay,  and  Mr  James  Henderson. 
Ibidem,  Tom.  XIll.  p.  305. 

Anno  1513,  He  is  with  John  Lord  Drummond  Commissarius  Regis  to  the  Court 
of  England.     Ibidem,  p.  346. 

He  was  taken  prisoner  at  Flodden,  and  sold  a  great  part  of  his  estate  to  raise  his 
ransom ;  the  contract  of  sale  is  in  Had.  Col.  p.  542. 

Anno  1524,  In  indent ura  treugarum  Scotice. 

The  Counsellors  and  Commissaries  of  the  Right  Excellent,  S^c.  James  King  of 
Scots,  are  Gilbert  Eaj'l  of  Cassilis,  Lord  Kennedy,  William  Scott  of  Balwyrie, 
knight,  and  Ma-  Adam  Otterburn,  to  which  indentures  they  set  their  seals  at  Ber- 
wick, 4th  September  1524,  and  the  c/W/f  cz/fo  Conimissariorum  Scotice  is  subscribed  by 
them  5th  September  1524. 

Anno  1525,  In  the  confirmation  of  peace  he  is  again  named  with  several  others; 
and  in  1526,  he  is  one  of  the  commission  to  treat  of  peace  and  war. 

Anno  1528,  He  is  one  of  the  commission  for  the  last  time,  and  first  named,  with 
Mr  Adam  Otterburn,  and  Andrew  Ker  of  Ferniherst,  predecessor  to  the  family  of 
Lothian  :  When  this  Sir  William  died  is  uncertain. 

Anno  159Q,  J.\.MES  Scqtt  of  Balwyrie  is  knighted  at  the  coronation  of  Anne 
Queen  of  Scots. 

The  direct  line  ended  in  his  grandchild  Colonel  Walter  Scott,  who  died  in 
Flanders,  in  the  reign  of  King  Charles  II.  A  little  before  his  death  he  sent  over 
to  Sir  John  Scott  of  Ancrum,  baronet,  the  seal  of  the  family,  along  with  a  letter 
acknowledging  him  the  nearest  male  relation  of  his  family,  being  lineally  de- 
scended from  Andrew  Scott  of  Glendoick,  a  younger  son  of  that  Sir  William 
whom  we  have  mentioned,  so  often  employed  with  a  public  character  in  the  seiwice 
of  his  country  :  Which  Andrew  married  Euphame  Blair,  daughter  to  Blair  of  Balthy- 
ock,  by  whom  he  had  Alexander,  who  married  Margaret  Ogilvie,  daughter  to 
Ogilvie  of  Inchmartin,  ancestor  to  the  Earl  of  Findlater,  who  bare  to  him  George, 
married  to  Katharine  Moncrief,  daughter  to  Moncrief  of  Rhind,  brother  to  Mon- 
crief  of  that  Ilk  ;  by  her  he  had  Patrick  Scott,  father  to  the  above  Sir  John,  by 
Elizabeth  Simpson,  daughter  to  Simpson  of  Monturpie  in  Fife,  now  e.xtinct. 

Sir  John  Scott  was  married  to  Elizabeth  Scott,  daughter  to  Francis  Scott  of 
Mangerton,  by  whom  he  had  Sir  Patrick  Scott  his  eldest  son,  and  issue  several 
sons  and  daughters. 

Sir  Patrick  had  by  his  lady,  Margaret  Scott,  daughter  to  Sir  William  Scott  of 
Harden,  Sir  John  his  eldest  son,  and  several  sons  and  daughters. 

Sir  John  is  married  to  Christian  Nisbet,  daughter  to  William  Nisbet  of 
Dirleton-,  and  has  by  her,  Patrick,  William,  John,  Walter,  and  Christian 
Scotts. 

All  which  is  documented  by  sasines  and  contracts  of  marriage,  in  the  hands  of 
Sir  John  Scott. 


APPENDIX^. 


BAILLIE  OF  Lamington. 


MR  ALEXANDER  BAILLIE  of  Castlecairj,  who  was  a  very  learned  aim 
quarian,  having  with  great  care  and  ingenuity  examined  into  the  origin  of  the 
surnanne  of  Bailhe,  was  of  opinion  that  it  was  the  same  with  Bahol,  and  that  the 
family  of  Lamington  was  a  branch  of  the  illustrious  House  of  the  Baliols,  who 
were  Lords  of  Galloway  in  Scotland;,  and  John  Baliol,  Lord  of  Galloway,  was  once 
King  of  Scotland.  He  had  an  uncle  Sir  Alexander  Baliol  of  Cavers,  who  was 
Great  Chamberlain  of  Scotland  in  the  reign  of  his  nephew  King  John,  anno  1292, 
by  Isabel  his  wife,  daughter  and  heir  of  Richard  dc  Chillam,  widow  of  David  de 
Strathhogy  Earl  of  Athol,  by  whom  he  had  a  son  Alexander  de  Baliol,  who  was  not 
so  submissive  to  the  English,  after  the  abdication  of  King  John  his  cousin,  as  might 
have  been  expected,  but  was  in  the  interest  of  his  country  ;  for  which,  falhnp: 
into  the  hands  of  the  enemy  during' the  v/ar,  he  was  imprisoned  in  the  Tower  of 
London,  by  order  of  King  Edward  II.  But  upon  security  given  by  his  father, 
and  two  gentlem.en  of  the  Lindsays,  he  was  enlarged  (rt).  He  had  another  son,  I 
mean  the  Lord  Chamberlain,  named  William,  who  was  designed  IVilliam  de  Baliol, 
who  had  the  lands  of  Penston  and  Carnbrue  in  the  barony  of  Bothwell,  which  are 
the  anciente^t  possessions  the  family  of  Lamington  had;  he,  after  the  abdication  of 
his  cousin  and  namesake  Kinj,-  John,  fell  in  with  great  zeal  with  other  patriots  in 
the  defence  of  the  liberties  of  their  country,  against  the  encroachments  and  inva- 
sions made  on  it  by  the  English,  which  rendered  him  so  obnoxious  to  King  Ed- 
ward I.  that  by  act  of  the  Parliament  of  England,  he  was  fined  in  four  years 
rent  of  his  estate  (i)  in  the  year  1297.  It  is  the  same  William  de  Baliol,  as 
he  is  designed,  who  gets  a  charter  from  King  Robert  the  Bruce  of  the  lands 
')f:  Penston,  which  were  his  own  before  (c).  The  William  de  Baliol  who  gave 
in  pure  alms  to  the  Monks  of  Newbottle,  licentiam  formandi  stagnum  in  terra 
de  Carnbrue.  This  deed  is  confirmed  by  his  superior  Williebnus  de  Moravia, 
miles,  Domiims  de  Bothwell,  to  which  he  appends  his  seal  (rf).  The  lands  of 
Carnbrue  being  a  very  ancient  possession  of  the  family  of  Lamington,  it  is  an 
argument  that  docs  not  want  its  own  weight,  that  they  are  of  the  family  of 
the  Baliols ;  that  this  William  de  Baliol  is  then  possessed  of  these  lands  as  early  as 
the  time  of  King  Robert  the  Bruce,  and  may  be  sooner,  and  they  continued  in  the 
lamily  till  they  were  given  off  to  a  younger  son,  who  was  the  ancestor  of  the 
Bahois  or  Baillies  of  the  House  of  Carphin.  The  fore-mentioned  Mr  Baillie 
of  Castlecairy,  who  was  a  very  learned  and  ingenious  antiquaiy,  was  of  opinion 
that  5fl//o/ was  the  Latin  at  that  time  for  Bailie;  and  that  Bailie  \n  English  is 
the  very  same  that  Baliol  is  in  Latin.  The  first  time  that  ever  the  surname  is 
found  Englished,  that  has  been  observed,  was,  that  this  gentleman,  Wilham 
Baillie  of  Lamington,  being  among  other  Scots  men  of  quality,  taken  prisoner  at 
the  battle  of  Durham  with  King  David  Bruce  in  the. year  1346;  in  the  list  of 
the  captives  he  is  designed  William  Baillie  (f).  This  gentleman  was,  after  his 
releasement,  made  a  Knight  by  King  David  Bruce  in  the  year  1357  (/"} ;  and 
having  married  the  eldest  daughter  and  heir  of  the  renowned  and  ever  justly 
celebrated  patriot  and  hero  Sir  William  Wallace  Governor  of  Scotland,  and 
General  of  the  Army  (^),  under  King  John,  with  whom  he  got  the  barony  ot 
Lamington :  and  so  far  as  the  History  of  Sir  William  Wallace  can  be  depended 
on,  it  vouches  this  marriage  and  aUiance :  for  the  author,  Mr  Blair,  tells  us  ex- 
pressly, that  Sir  William's  daughter  was  married  to  a  squire  of  the  Baliols'  blood, 
and  that  way  got  the  barony  of  Lamington,  which  had  formerly  belonged  to 
those  of  the  surname  of  Braidfoot,  whose  heir-female   of  that  name  was  married 

{a)  Rymer's  FcEclera.  (J)')  In  the  deed  in  Rymer  he  is  designed  William  de  Baliol.  (c)  In  the  old 
rolls  of  King  Robert.  (</)  Chartubry  of  Newbottle.  (f)  Rymet's  Fcedera  Anglia;.  (/)  For  there 
in  the  charter  of  Hosmono  he  is  designed  William  Baillie,  militi.  {g^  In  a  charter  in  my  custody  he  is 
designed  Willielmus  Wallace,  miles,  dux  cxercitus  regnl  Scotias,  persona  prceclara  Principis  Joannis  Dei 
gratia  Regis  Scototum. 


APPENDIX.  129 

CO  Sir  William  Wallace ;  but  I  think  we  have  a  better  voucher  than  the  History  of 
Wallace,  that  this  Sir  William  Baillie  was  proprietor  of  the  barony  of  Lamington; 
it  is  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal  of  King  David  II.  which  is  in  the  charter-chest 
of  the  family  of  Lamington,  which  I  have  seen,  and  the  exact  copy  of  it  here  fol- 
lows, at  least  as  much  as  makes  for  our  purpose,  to  illustrate  the  history  and  suc- 
cession of  the  family. 

"  David  Dei  gratia  Rex  Scotorum,  Sciatis  nos  dedisse,  concessisse,  et  hac  present! 

"  carta  nostra  confirmasse  dilecto  et  fideli  nostri  Willielmo  Baillie,  militi,  totam  ba- 

"  roniam  de  Lambistoun :  Faciendo  nobis  et  iicredibus  nostris  dictus  Willielmus  et 

"  heredes  sui  servitia  dcbita  et  consueta,  &-c.     Coram  his  testibus  Willielmo  et  Pa- 

"  tricio  cancellario  nostro  ScotiEC,  Sancti  Andrea?  et  Brechinen.  ecclesiarum  episco- 

"  pis,  Roberto  Comite  de  Strathern  ncpote  nostro,  carissimo  Thoma  comite  dc 

"  Marr  consanguineo  nostro,  dilecto  WiUielmo  Comite  de  Douglas,  Willielmo  de 

"  Livingstoun,  Willielmo  de  Ramsay,   et  Roberto  de  Erskine,  militibus.     Apud 

"  Edinburgh  vicesimo  septimo  die  mensis  Januarii,  anno  regni  nnstri  tricesimo  oc- 

"  tavo  •"  that  is  the  year  of  our  Lord  1368. 

This  Sir  William  Baillie  of  Lamington,  by  his  wife  aforesaid,  the  daughter 
and  heit  of  Sir  William  Wallace,  had  issue  two  sons,  William  the  heir  of  the  fa- 
mily, and  a  second  son  Alexander,  whom  the  great  antiquary,  Mr  Baillie  of  Castle- 
cairy  vouched  to  be  tlie  first  of  the  Baillies  of  the  family  of  Carphin,  and  his 
own  predecessor  too  ;  for  of  Carphin  is  descended,  beside  the  Baillies  of  Pavbroth, 
who  are,  or  soon  will  be,  the  representatives  of  this  branch  of  the  House  of  La- 
mington, the  Baillies  of  Park,  Jeriston,  Dunrogal,  Carnbrue,  Castlecairy,  and 
Provan,  the  first  of  whom  was  Mr  Robert  Baillie  of  Provan,  who  was  President 
of  the  Session  from  the  1565,  till  his  death  in  the  1595.  He  left  a  daughter 
his  heir.  Dame  Margaret  Baillie,  who  was  married  to  Sir  Robert  Hamilton  of 
Silvertonhill.  Of  this  branch  of  the  Baillies  of  the  House  of  Carphin  was  Mr 
Cuthbert  Baillie,  who  was  Rector  of  Cumnock,  Commendator  of  Glenluce,  and 
Lord  High  Treasurer  of  Scotland  in  the  reign  of  King  James  IV.  anno  151 2  («). 
To  Sir  William  Baillie  of  Hoprig  and  Lamington  succeeded  another 

William,  his  son  and  heir,  who  is  designed  IVillielmus  Baillie  of  Hoprig,  when 
he  gets  a  charter  from  his  cousin,  as  he  is  called,  Joannis  de  Hamilton,  Dominus  de 
Cadiow,  ancestor  to  his  Grace  the  Duke  of  Hamilton,  of  the  lands  of  Hyndshaw 
and  Watston,  dated  the  4rh  of  February  1595,  "  test.  Domino  Joanni  Hamilton, 
"  Domino  de  Fingletoun,  Joanni  de  Hamilton  de  le  Ross,  Alexandro  de  Hamil- 
"  ton  de  Innerw  ick,  militibus  (A)."  He  married  Isabel,  daughter  of  Sir  William 
Seaton  of  tiiat  Ilk,  ancestor  to  the  Earl  of  Winton  (c)  ;  by  whom  he  had  Sir  Wil- 
liam his  son  and  heir. 

This  Sir  Willi-'V-m  Baillie  of  Hoprig,  as  he  is  designed,  is  one  of  the  hostage; 
sent  to  England  for  the  ran.  3m  of  King  James  I.  in  exchange  for  David  Leslie  of 
that  Ilk,  anno  1432  (d).  He  married  Katharine,  daughter  of  Sir  John  Hamilton  of 
Cadyow  («■)  ;  by  whom  he  had  Sir  William  his  successor,  who  gets  a  charter  of 
the  lands  or"  Watston,  &-c.  fiom  Jacobus  Dominus  Hamilton  carissimo  consanguineo 
suo  ;  and  tlie  granter  calls  him,  lYilliam  Baillie  de  Eagleshame,  on  the  resignation 
of  Sir  William  Baillie  of  Lamington,  his  father,  in  the  1445. 

The  witnesses  to  the  Lord  Hamilton's  charter  are  John  Stewart  of  Craigie, 
Philip  Mowbray  of  Barnbougle,  Ronald  Crawfurd  of  Haining.  and  William  Cle- 
land  of  Clelandton.  This  Sir  VMlham,  the  younger  of  Lamington,  gets  a  charter 
from  King  James  III.  of  the  fee  of  his  father's  estate,  particularly  of  the  lands 
of  Penston  ;  he  is  designed ///o  et  heiedi  apparenti  Domini  IVtllielmi  Baillie  de  Hop- 
rig, anno  1466  (/) ;  and  the  same  year  in  a  retour  of  Robert  Li\nngston  of  Drumry, 
he  is  designed  of  Lamington  ;  so  that  in  this  Sir  William's  time  he  has  been 
promiscuously  designed  of  Hoprig  and  Lamington;  but  from  thenceforth  he  and  his 
successors  are  uniformly  designed  of  Lamington. 

(a)  Lives  of  the  Lord  High  Treasurers.  (i)  The  charter  I  copied  out  of  the  Registers.  (c)  Ge- 
nealogy of  the  House  of  Lamington.  (J)  Rymer's  Foedera  Anghae.  {f)  Genealogy  of  the  House  of 
Lamington.     (/^Charter  in  the.  records  of  the  Great  Seal. 

Vol.  U.  5  R 


13^ 


APPENDIX. 


In  the  1484,  he  is  one  of  the  conservators  of  the  peace  with  England  on  the 
part  of  Scotland,  that  then  concluded  at  Nottingham,  anno  14S4  i^g)  ;  and  the 
next  year  thereafter,  anno  1485,  I  find  him  witness  to  a  charter  granted  by  John 
Lord  Somerville,  to  John  Somerville  his  son,  of  the  lands  of  Cambusnethan,  pro- 
created betwixt  him  and  Mary  Baillie  his  wife,  who.  was  daughter  of  this  Sir  Wil- 
liam Baillie  of  Lamington  :  there  are  also  witnessing  to  the  charter,  William  Bail- 
he,  son  and  heir-apparent  to  Sir  William  Baillie  of  Lamington,  and  Richard  Bail- 
lie,  brother  to  the  said  Sir  WiUiam  BaiUie  (/j)..  This  Sir  Wilham  Baillie  of  La- 
mington left  issue  Sir  William  his  successor. 

Margaret,  who  was  married  to  John  Earl  of  Sutherland  (?'),  and  had  issue. 

Mary  to  John  Lord  Somerville,  and  had  issue. 

Marion  to  John  Lord  Lindsay  of  the  Byres,  ancestor  to  the  present  Earl  of 
Crawford  {k),  and  had  two  daughters,  his  heir,  and  the  heirs  of  line  of  this  noble 
family  of  Lindsay  ;  Margaret,  who  was  married  to  Richard  Lord  Innermeath ; 
and  secondly,  to  Sir  James  Stewart  of  Bath,  brother  to  Andrew  Lord  Evandaie, 
and  the  paternal  ancestor  of  the  present  Earl  of  Murray.  Elizabeth,  the  second 
daughter,  was  married  to  her  own  cousin  Sir  William  Baillie  of  Lamington. 

Sir  William  Baillie  of  Lamington,  son  to  the  former  Sir  William,  is  at  the 
head  of  the  family,  and  is  Laird  of  Lamington  himself,  when,  in  the  year  1492,  he 
has  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal  to  him,  and  Marion  Home,  his  wife,  in  conjunct 
fee  and  infeftment  (/).  This  lady  was  the  daughter  of  Sir  Patrick  Home  of  Pol- 
warth,  Comj^lroller  of  Scotland  in  the  reign  of  King  James  IV.  ancestor  to  the 
Earl  of  Marchmont,  by  whom  he  had  William  his  son  and  heir,  and  John,  of 
whom  descended  the  Baillies  of  St  John's  Kirk,  of  whom  are  come  the  Baillies 
of  Jerviswood  and  Walston  (w). 

Sir  William  Baillie  of  Lamington,  the  next  of  the  line  and  successon  ot  this 
ancient  honourable  family,  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  and  one  of  the  heirs  of 
line  of  John  Lord  Lindsay  of  the  Byres,  by  whom  he  had  William  his  son  and 
heir,  and  a  daughter,  Janet,  who  was  married  to  Sir  David  Hamilton  of  Preston,, 
and  had  issue  {n), 

Sir  William  Baillie  of  Lamington,  his  son  and  successor,  was  made  principal' 
Master  of  the  Wardrobe  to  Queen  Mary,  by  a  gift  under  the  Privy  Seal,  the  24th 
of  January  1542  (0).  He  married  Janet  Hamilton  (^6),  daughter  of  James  first 
EarlofArran,  and  sister  to  James  Duke  of  Chatelherault,  by  whom  he  had  Sir 
William  his  successor,  and  a  younger  son,  of  whom  are  the  Baillies  of  Bagbie  and: 
Hardington,  and  their  cadets  (9).  His  aUiance  with  the  illustrious  family  of  Ha- 
milton brought  him  to  fall  in  with  them  in  the  pohtics  at  that  time,  for  he  was  a 
firm  and  steady  friend  to  Qiieen  Mary  ;  for  which  he  was  afterwards  forfeited  for 
being  of  her  party  at  the  field  of  Langside,  against  the  Earl  of  Murray  the  Regent,. 
anno  1568  (r). 

He  married  Dame  Margaret  Maxwell,  daughter  of  John  Lord  Maxwell,  and  wi- 
dow and  relict  of  Archibald  Earl  of  Angus,  who  had  been  formerly  married  to 
Margaret  Queen  Dowager  of  Scotland,  and  daughter  of  Henry  VII.  of  England, 
by  whom  he  had  only  one  daughter,  Margaret.  During  this  marriage.  Sir  Wil- 
liam having  no  male  issue,  and  but  in  small  hopes  of  any  while  his  lady  was  alive, 
he  was  induced  by  her  means,  and  her  great  and  noble  relations,  to  marry  his 
daughter  to  a  nephew  of  hers,  Edward  Maxwell,  commendator  of  Dundrennan,  the 
third  son  of  John  Lord  Herries  of  Terreagles,  and  settled  the  fee  of  the  estate  on  the 
issue  of  the  marriage  absolutely,  reserving  no  more  than  a  liferent  to  himself  and 
the  Countess  of  Angus  his  wife,  and  but  a  small  provision  to  any  lady  or  subse- 
quent wife  he  might  have.  The  condition  he  required  of  his  heir  of  entail  was^  that 
they  should  assume  and  use  the  surname  of  BaiUie,  and  the  arms  of  the  House  of  Lam- 
ington ;  and  there  was  a  special  act  of  Parhament  procured  to  that  effect  (/).    After 

(^)  Rymer'sFoedcra.  {h)  Charter  in  tbe  hands  of  the  Lord  Somerville.  {i)  Sir  Robert  Gordon's  His- 
tory of  the  House  of  Sutherland,  MS.  (Ji)  Charter  in  the  Records,  anno  1497.  (/)  Charter  in  the 
public  Records.  {in)  Genealogy  of  the  House  of  Lamington,  penes  me.  (n)  Charter  in  the  records 
of  the  Great  Seal.  (o)  The  gift  is  in  the  Registers.  (/■)  Ibidem.  (y)  Genealogy  of  the  House  of 
Lamington,  MS.  penes  me.  (r)  The  act  of  forfeiture  is  in  the  records  which  I.  have  seen,  and  from 
■whence  this  note  is  copied,     (j-)  Acts  of  Parliament.  ' 


APPENDIX.  131 

ihis  settlement,  a  little  before  the  death  of  his  lady,  or,  as  they  say,  much  about 
that  time,  he  procreated  upon  a  gentlewoman,  one  Mrs  Home,  a  son,  William 
Baillie,  and,  upon  his  lady's  death,  he  married  her,  in  view  of  legitimating  the  son 
m  virtue  of  the  subsequent  marriage,  imagining,  that  he  might  have  got  broke  the 
settlement  of  his  estaie  in  favour  of  his  daughter  and  her  heirs ;  for  it  was  always 
in  failure  of  heirs-male  of  his  own  body  that  his  heirs  at  law  were  to  succeed  :  But 
it  being  clearly  proven,  by  the  presbytery  books  of  Lanark,  that  the  son  was  got 
while  Lamington's  lady,  the  Countess  of  Angus  (?)  was  alive,  the  reducing  the 
settlement  to  and  in  favour  of  his  daughter  was  found  impracticable.  This  rub 
in  the  young  gentleman's  way  of  succeeding  to  his  father's  estate,  and  which  the 
father  had  so  much  at  heart,  discouraged  him  so  much,  that  he  went  over  to  the 
German  wars,  and  entered  into  the  service  of  the  renowned  Gustavus  Adolphus, 
King  of  Sweden,  against  the  imperialists,  where,  by  his  conduct  and  gallant  be- 
haviour, he  attained  to  the  degree  of  a  major-general,  and  had  the  character  of  an 
excellent  officer.  When  the  troubles  began  in  the  year  163B,  he  was,  among  other 
Scots  general  officers,  called  over  from  Germany  and  Sweden  by  the  covenanters, 
to  head  and  command  the  anny  they  raised  under  the  obligation  of  the  covenant, 
and  listed  himself  in  the  Parliament's  service.  From  the  minutes  of  the  Parha- 
ment  1641,  which  I  have  seen,  it  appears  that  Lieutenant-General  Baillie  made 
some  faint  efforts  to  reduce  the  settlement  of  the  estate  of  Lamington,  but  the 
thing  would  not  do  in  point  of  law  ;  so  it  was  dropped.  He  served  the  Parliament 
in  the  quality  of  lieutenant-general  during  the  war,  and  was  in  several  encounters 
with  the  Marquis  of  Montrose,  as  may  be  seen  in  the  history  of  the  times,  to  ^ 
which  1  refer  the  reader.  General  Baillie  married  Janet,  daughter  of  Sir  William ' 
Bruce  of  Glenhouse,  by  Janet  his  wife,  daughter  and  heir  of  John  Baillie  of  Lethara, 
with  whom  he  got  the  estate  of  Letham  in  Stirlingshire,  and  had  James  his  eldest 
son,  who  became  Lord  Forrester  of  Gorstorphine,  by  the  marriage  of  Jean,  daugh- 
ter and  heir  of  entail  both  to  the  estate  and  honour  of  her  father  ;  but  he  dying 
without  issue  by  her  in  the  1679,  the  estate  and  honour  of  Lord  Forrester  came, 
by  virtue  of  the  entail  and  special  destination,  to  his  brother's  son,  William  Baillie, 
son  of  William  Baillie  of  Torwood,  by  Lilias  his  wife,  another  of  the  daughters  of 
George  Lord  Forrester,  by  whom  he  had  George  Lord  Forrester,  father  to  the  pre- 
sent George  Lord  Forrester. 

Bat,  to  return  to  the  family  of  Lamington,  we  are  to  observe,  that  William 
Maxwell  alias  Baillie  of  Lamington,  the  grandson  and  heir  of  Sir  William  Baillie 
of  Lamington,  by  Dame  Margaret  Baillie  his  daughter,  was  after  that  knighted  by 
King  James  VL  He  married  Elizabeth  Stewart,  daughter  of  Henry  Stewart  of 
Craigiehall  in  Linlithgowshire,  by  Jean  his  wife,  daughter  of  James  Lord  Ross  of 
Halkhead  ;  by  whom  he  had  Sir  William  his  successor,  James  of  Watsonhead,  an- 
cestor of  Mr  James  Baillie,  advocate ;  and  daughters,  Jean,  married   to   the  Laird 

of  Coulterallers,  and  had  issue,  and to  Gavin  Hamilton  of  Raploch;. 

and  had  issue 

Sir  William  Baillie  of  Lamington,  his  son,  married  Griizel,  daughter  of  Sir 
Claud  Hamilton  of  Elieston,  son  to  Claud  Lord  Paisley,  and  brother  to  James  the 
first  Earl  of  Abercorn,  by  Grissel  his  wife,  daughter  and  heir  of  Robert  Hamilton 
of  Lickperrick,  by  whom  he  had  Sir  Samuel  Baillie  his  eldest  son,  who  died  in  the 
lifetime  of  his  father  ;  but  left  issue  by  Janet  his  wife,  eldest  daughter  of  John 
Lord  Belhaven,  a  son,  William,  who  was  his  grandfather's  successor,  and  a  daugh- 
ter, Margaret,  who  was  married  to  James  Semple,  son,  and  heir  apparent  of  Sir 
WilHam  Semple  of  Cathcart,  and  had  issue.  Which  William,  so  succeeding  his 
grandfather,  was  a  virtuous,  frugal,  worthy  gentleman.  He  married  first  Marjory, 
daughter  of  John  first  Lord  Bargeny,  by  whom  he  had  a  son,  William,  a  very 
hopeful,  promising  young  gentleman,  who  died  in  his  seventeenth  year,  much  re- 
gretted by  all  that  knew  him.  After  his  son's  death  he  mamed,  secondly,  Lady 
Henrietta  Lindsay,  daughter  of  William  Earl  of  Crawford,  Lord  President  of  the 
Council  in  the  reign  of  King  William,  by  whom  he  had  only  daughters,  Margaret 
the  eldest,  married  to  Sir  James  Carmichael  of  Bonnington,  who  sunk  his  estate  in- 
to the  family  of  Lamington,  and  to  the  heirs  of  the  marriage,  the  heir-male  being 

(/)  From  CasUecairy's  account  of  the  House  oi  Lamington. 


xyi  APPENDIX. 

to  bear  the  surname  of  Baillie,  and  the  arms  of  the  House  of  Lamington,  who  it 
the  present  Sir  Wiliiam  Baillie  of  Lamington,  Baronet,  as  heir  to  his  father's 
patent. 

The  other  daughter  of  Lamington  was  married  first  to  Robert  Watson  of  Hur- 
rays, and  again  to  Major  William  Erskine  of  Torry,  nephew  to  the  Lord  Card- 


HAY  OF  Ranfield  and  Inchnock. 


THE  first' of  this  branch  of  the  Hays  was  Mr  Andrew  Hay,  son  to  Hay  of  Lin-- 
plum  and  Bara,  who  was  a  brother  of  the  House  of  Yester,  now  dignified  with  the 
title  of  Marquis  of  Tweeddale  ;  he  was  bred  to  the  church,  and  was  a  canon  of  the- 
Cathedral  Church  ot  Glasgow.  At  the  Reformation  he  embraced  the  Protestant 
Rehgiun,  and  continued  his  prebendary,  and  was  rector  and  parson  of  the  church 
of  Renfrew,  and  was  a  learned  and  moderate  man,  and  sometimes  was  a  commis- 
sioner or  superintendant  of  the  churches  in  the  west ;  of  him  our  histories  of  the 
church  speak  with  great  regard  and  esteem.  He  continued  parson  of  Renfrew  till 
his  death.  He  married  Jean,  daughter  to  Wallace  of  Craigie,  by  whom  he  had 
Mr  John  Hay  of  Ranfield,  parson  of  Renfrew,  his  eldest  son,  and  Dr  Theodore 
Hay,  parson  of  Peebles,  and  archdeacon  of  Glasgow  ;  whose  son,  Mr  John,  suc- 
ceeded him  in  the  same  office  of  parson  of  Peebles  and  archdeacon  of  Glasgow;  and 
his  grandchild,  Mr  John  Hay,  is  present  minister  of  the  Gospel  at  Peebles. 

Mr  John  Hay,  the  eldest  son,  succeeded  his  father  in  the  estate  of  Ranfield,, 
and  in  the  parsonage  of  Renfrew.  He  married,  first,  Agnes,  daughter  of  Claud 
Hamilton  of  Cockney,  by  whom  he  had  Mr  John  Hay  of  Ranfield,  and  parson  of 
Renfrew,  and  three  daughters,  the  eldest  married  to  John  Noble  of  Ferm,  the  se- 
cond to  John  Walkingshaw  of  that  Ilk,  and  the  third  to  John  Montgomery  of 
Scotston.  He  died,  as  his  father,  parson  of  Renfrew.  He  married  to  his  second 
wife,  Jean  Somerville  of  the-House  of  Cambusnethan,  by  whom  he  had  Mr  Andrew 
Hay  of  Zoarlands. 

Mr  John  Hay  of  Ranfield,  and  Parson  of  Renfrew,  succeeded  his  father  both 
in  the  estate  and  m  the  parsonage,  and  had  been  before  minister  at  Killallan.  He 
was,  even  in  the  highest  times  of  presbytery,  suspected  of  being  a  royalist,  though 
he  had  complied  by  taking  the  covenant :  but  not  being  thorough-paced  that  way, 
and  loyalty  hanging  about  him,  even  to  a  crime,  the  presbytery,  upon  some  frivo- 
lous pretences,  and  these  very  ill  proven,  found  means  to  depose  him  from  his 
function.  Upon  that  he  sold  his  estate  of  Ranfield  in  the  parish  of  Renfrew,  and 
acquired  the  lands  of  Inchnock  in  the  parish  of  Monkland  and  shire  of  Lanark, 
that  had  belonged  to  Mr  David  Forsyth  of  Hallhill,  commissary  of  Glasgow,  his 
father-in-law.  Here  he  lived  privately  and  retiredly  till  the  king's  Restoration, 
that  episcopacy  being  restored,  he  was  reponed  to  his  church  and  parsonage  of 
Renfrew,  where  he  continued  to  exercise  his  pastoral  function  till  his  death  in  the 
1665.  He  married  Agnes,  daughter  to  the  foresaid  Mr  David  Forsyth  of  Hallhill 
and  Dykes,  by  whom  he  had 

Mr  Andrew  Hay  of  Inchnock,  his  son  and  heir,  who  married  Mary  Hutcheson, 
daughter  and  co-heir  of  Mr  John  "Hutcheson  of  Scotston,  by  whom  he  had,  Mr 
John  his  successor,  George  Hay,  the  second  son,  whose  son  is  Mr  James  Hay, 
writer  in  Edinburgh,  heir-male  and  representative  of  the  family,  and  several 
daughters ;  the  eldest  of  which  was  married  to  Mr  Robert  Fleming,  minister  of 
the  gospel  at  Kirkintulloch,  and  son  to  John  Fleming  of  Caderroch,  a  branch  of 
the  ancient  House  of  WeddeUie,  whose  son  is  Robert  Fleming,  printer  in  Edin~ 
burgh,  editor  of  this  Work. 

Mr  John  Hay  of  Inchnock,  in  imitation  of  his  ancestors,  turned  his  thoughts  to- 
ward the  service  of  the  church;  and  being  put  into  holy  orders,  was  first  ordained 


APPENDIX.  135 

to  the  ministry  at  Yester,  from  whence  he  was  translated  to  Dunlop,  and  after- 
wards to  the  parsonage  of  Monkland  and  sub-deanry  of  Glasgow,  where  he  sat  till 
the  revolution  in  1689,  which  he  long  survived,  and  was  in  very  high  esteem  by 
people  of  all  persuasions,  and  a  worthy  pious  gentleman.  He  married  Anne 
Graham,  daughter  of  John  Graham  of  Dougalston,  by  ^\  horn  lie  had 

John  H.\y  of  Incliuock,  who  was  a  knowing,  prudent,  virtuous,  and  facetious 
gentleman.  He  died  unmarried,  so  that  his  tlu-ee  sisters  became  heirs  portion- 
ers  of  his  estate.  Margaret  the  eldest,  married  iVIr  John  White,  writer  in  Edin- 
burgh. 

Tlie  arms  borne  by  this  famdy  was  the  tliree  escutcheons,  the  common  bearing 
of  all  the  Hays,  and  a  mullet  or  star  in  the  centre,  as  a  brotherly  difference. 


LOG  KH ART  of  Cleghorx. 


THE  present  Cleghorn  is  lineally  descended  of  Sir  Ali..\n  Lock.hart  of  Cleghorn, 
of  whom  mention  is  frequently  made  in  the  reign  of  King  James  II.  whose  son 
Sir  Stephen  Lockhart  is  infeft  in  the  ten-pound  land  of  old  extent  of  Cleghorn, 
I2th  March  1476  ;  and,  by  a  charter  from  the  crown  of  the  lands  of  Grugfoot, 
dated  in  June  1482,  and  another  of  the  twenty-merk  land  of  Bothwell,  27th  Septem- 
ber 1483,  he  is  in  both  designed  his  Majesty's  armour-bearer.  Anno  1493,  a  truce  be- 
ing concluded  betwixt  King  James  IV.  and  Henry  VII.  there  was  an  additional, 
subsidy  laid  on  by  Parliament  for  defraying  the  charge  of  the  king's  marriage,  and 
Sir  Stephen,  with  some  others,  are  appointed  to  receive  and  account  for  that 
money.  His  son  Allan,  by  a  lady  named  Crichton,  a  near  relation  of  the  chan- 
cellor's, married  Katharine,  a  daughter  of  Whiteford's  of  that  Ilk,  or  of  Milton  ;  and 
upon  his  father's  resignation,  he  and  his  spouse  obtained  a  charter  from  the  king 
of  the  lands  of  Grugfoot,  dated  the  22d  November  i486  ;  but  being  slain  with  the 
king  at  Flodden,  anno  15 15,  his  son  Alexander  is  retoured  to  his  grandfather  Sir 
Stephen,  in  the  above  lands  of  Cleghorn  and  Bothwell,  17th  of  January  1519. 
And  by  Euphame,  daughter  to  Hamilton  of  Innervvick,  he  had  Mungo,  who  suc- 
ceeded, conform  to  precept  forth  of  the  Chancery,  and  sasine  thereon,  dated  28th 

May   1569.      Mungo   married Hamilton,    daughter  to  Sir  James 

Hamilton  of  Stenhouse,  by  whom  he  had  Allan  his  successor,  between  whom, 
with  consent  of  his  father,  and  Elizabeth  Ross,  with  consent  of  Robert  Lord  Ross 
her  brother,  and  Dame  Jean  Sample  her  mother,  there  was  a  contract  of  marriage, 
22d  November  1582,  conform  whereunto,  upon  the  26th  March  1583,  the  above 
Mungo  resigns  in  the  King's  hands  the  lands  of  Cleghorn,  Grugfoot,  Bothwell, 
and  others,  extending  to  a  fifty-three  pound  land  of  old  extent ;  and,  upon  his 
resignation,  Allan  obtains  from  the  crown  a  charter  said  year.  Of  this  marriage 
there  was  Alexander  and  five  other  sons,  of  whom  are  descended  sundry  honourable 
and  noble  persons.  Alexander  succeeded  his  father,  and  married  Nicolas,  eldest 
daughter  to  Maxwell  of  Calderwood.  Their  contract  is  dated  the  24th  February 
1604.  His  eldest  son  and  successor,  James,  married  Elizabeth,  eldest  daughter  to 
Sir  James  Lockhart  of  Lee,  one  of  the  Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice  :  in  his 
contract  of  marriage  his  father  dispones  the  above  lands,  extending  to  fifty-three 
pounds  of  old  extent ;  and  he  obtained  a  charter  thereon,  4th  July  1627.  This 
James  suffered  mucli  in  person  and  estate  under  the  usurpation  ;  for,  besides  the 
price  of  the  lands  of  Grugfoot,  which  he  sent  to  the  king  at  BrcJa,  he  raised  a 
troop  of  horse  and  company  of  foot,  with  whom  he  joined  the  Duke  of  Ha- 
milton ;  but  being  taken,  he  was  condemned  to  die,  and  though,  by  mediation 
of  friends,  he  obtained  his  life,  yet  his  estate  was  much  impaired  by  a  fine  of  fifty 
thousand  merks.  He  had  issue,  Allan  and  James,  who  both  succeeded  him  ;  Allan 
is  infeft  under  the  Great  Seal  3d  November  1665,  and  was  bred  up  in  the  law  at 
London,  where  he  obtained  to  be  a  professor  both  in  the  Inn's  and  Chancery  Court; 
but  dying  unmarried,  James,  his  said  brother,  succeeded,  and  is  infeft  upon  a  retour,^ 

Vol.  XL  5  S 


134 


APPENDIX. 


dated   8th  January  1681,  whose  son,  the   present  Allan   Lockhait   of  Cleghorn, 
married  Anne  VVinram,  heiress  of  Wiston. 

The  armorial  bearing  of  Lockhart  of  Cleghorn,  eldest  family  of  that  name  extant 
on  record,  is,  a  shield  parted  per  pale  azure  and  gules,  on  the  fast  three  boars' 
heads  erased  argent,  two  in  chief,  and  one  in  base,  being  his  own  paternal  coat^ 
the  ancient  bearing  of  his  name  and  family,  as  appears  from  the  arms  cut  on  an 
echancre  shield  on  his  outer-gate,  much  defaced  by  length  of  time,  and  on  several 
other  places;  on  the  second,  a  X2i.m.  passant  of  the  third,  being  the  armsof  Winram 
of  Wiston,  chief  of  that  name,  the  heiress  whereof  is  the  present  Lady  Cleghorn, 
with  crest  and  mantle  befitting  his  degree ;  and,  for  motto.  Sit  sine  labe  fides,  as 
per  his  coat  of  arms,  Plate  VIII. 


An  Account  of  the  Family  of  the  Name  of  CHARTERIS  (/Amisfield,  as  mentioned 
in  the  Ancient  History  of  Scotland,  and  instructed  by  the  Records  of  the  Kingdoniy 
extant  in  the  Lower  Parliament  House,  collected  anno  1722. 


OUR  historians  say,  that  when  Robert  Bruce  Earl  of  Carrick,  son  to  Robert  Bruce 
EarlofAnnandale, returned  from  England  to  hisownhouseofLochmabenin  Scotland, 
after  the  treacherous  information  given  against  him  by  John  Cumin  Earl  of  Buchan, 
to  King  Edward  I.  of  England,  he  there  found  Edward  Bruce  his  brother,  Robert 
Fleming,  James  Lindsay,  Roger  Kirkpatrick,  and  Thomas  Charteris,  to  whom  he 
gave  an  account  of  the  danger  he  had  escaped. 

These  brave  gentlemen  standing  firm  to  King  Robert  Bruce  his  interest,  follow- 
ed him  in  all  his  famous  battles,  until  he  retrieved  his  country  from  the  English 
subjection  (rt). 

The  records  of  this  kingdom  being  carried  up  to  England  by  the  usurper  Oli- 
ver Cromwell,  in  their  return  hither,  after  the  happy  Restoratien,  many  of  the 
records  were  lost  at  sea,  amongst  which  a  great  number  of  the  ancient  records  of 
charters. 

And  because  the  first  charter  of  the  family  of  Amisfield,  which  is  found  amongst 
the  records  now  extant,  is  only  in  King  James  III.  his  time,  and  that  that  charter 
makes  mention  of  the  services  done  by  Sir  Robert  Charteris,  great-grandfather  to 
Robert,  to  whom  the  charter  is  granted,  it  is  more  than  probable,  that  the  charters 
in  favour  of  Thomas  first  mentioned,  and  of  the  said  Sir  Robert,  have  had  the 
misfortune  to  be  lost  at  that  time  {h). 


FOLLOW  THE  CHARTERS  IN  ORDER,  AS  BOOKED  IN  THE  RECORDS, 
I. 

"  Carta  Roberti  Charters  de  Amysfield  armigero  nostro(<r),  pro  suo  fideli  et 
"  gratuito  servitio,  nobis  temporibus  prsteritis  multipliciter  impensis,  et  prascipue 
"  in  virili  resistentia,  per  ipsum  Robertum  exhibit,  contra  nostros  rebelles  et  pro- 
"  ditores,  viz.  quondam  Alexandrum  Stewart  olira  ducem  Albanie,  et  Jacobum 
"  Douglas  olim  comitem  de  Douglas,  et  alios  nostros  rebelles  et  proditores,  et  ve- 
"  teres  nostros  Anglian  inimicos,  super  merchias  nostros  occidentales  regni  nostri  in 
"  bello  comiss.  ac  etiam  pro  suo  fideli  servitio  nobis  impendendo,  quatuor  merca- 
"  tas  terrarum  de  Polmentre,  cum  pertinen.  jacen.  in  dominio  nostro  Galurdie  ui- 
"  fra  sencscallatum  de  Kirkcubright,  que  fuerunt  quond.  Roberti  Charters  militis 
"  patris  avi  dicti  Roberti,  et  ab  ipso  violenter,  per  predecessores  dicti  Jacobi 
"  Douglas  raptum  et  spoliatum,  causa  et  occasione  fidelis  servitiis  dicti  Roberti, 
"  nobis  et  progenitoribus  nostris  impensis,  &-c.     Apud.  Edin.  quinto  die  mensis 

(a)  Anno  1306.     (i)  Anno  1661.     (c)  jth  Book,  Ja.  III.  No.  134. 


APPENDIX.  1^^ 

Martii,  anno  Domini  milesiino  quadringentesimo  octuagesimo  septimo,  et  legnl 
nostri  vicesimo  octavo." 

II. 

"  Carta  confirmationis  Roberto  Charters  de  Amysfield  duas  carta's  (rt),  una  vide- 
licet dilecti  nostri  Roberti  Crichtoun  de  Sanquhar  militis  factam  et  comessam 
dilecto  notro  Roberto  Charteris  de  Amysfield  de  tresdecem  mercatas  terrarum 
antiqiii  extentus,  cum  pertinen.  jacen.  in  villa  et  territorio  de  Langniddrie,  in 
baronia  de  Tranent,  in  constabularia  de  Haddingtoun,  intra  vicecomitatum  nos- 
trum de  Edinburgh;  aliam  vero  cartam  confirmationis  dilecti  consanguinei  nos- 
tri Joannis  domini  Setoun,  super  donatione  predicti  Roberti  Crichtoun  antedict. 
etiam  prefato  Roberto  Charters,  factam  de  mandato  nostro  visas,  lectas,  inspec- 
tas  et  diligenter  examinatas,  sanas,  integras  non  rasas,  non  cancellatas,  nee  in 
aliquibus  partibus  earund.  suspectas,  ad  plenum  intellexisse ;  cujus  tenor  sequi- 
tur,  &.C.  Apud  Edinburgum  vicesimo  primo  die  mensis  Augustii,  anno.  Do- 
mini millesimo  quadringentesimo  sexagesimo  tertio." 


m. 

Carta  coiifrtnationis  Roberto  Charters  de  Amysfield. 

"  Jacobus,  Dei  gratia,  rex  Scotorum,  &-c.  {]>).  Sciatis  nos  quandam  cartam  di- 
"  lecti  nostri  Roberti  Crichtoun  de  Sanquhar  militis  factam  et  comessam,  dilecto 
"  nostro  Roberto  Charters  de  Amysfield,  de  uno  annuo  reditu  viginti  librarum 
"  usualis  moneta;  regni  nostri,  annuatim  levan.  de  omnibus  et  singulis  terris  ba- 
"  roniae  de  Sanquhar,  cum  pertinen.  jacen.  infra  vicecomit.  nostrum  de  Dumfreis, 
"  de  mandato  nostro,  visam,  lectam,  &.c.  Apud  Edinburgum  decimo  nono  die 
"  mensis  Octobris,  anno  Domini  millesimo  quadringentesimo  sexagesimo  quarto." 


IV. 

"  Alia  charta  confirmationis  dicti  Roberti  (r),  de  tresdecem  mercatas  terrarunv 
de  Langniddrie,  anno  1463." 


Carta  confirmationis  Roberto  Charters  de  Amysfield. 

"  Jacobus,  Dei  gratia,  rex  Scotorum,  &c.  {d').  Sciatis  nos  quandam  cartam  di- 
'^  lecti  nostri  Alexandri  Campbel  de  Corswoul  factam  et  comessam,  dilecto  nostro 
"  Roberto  Charters  de  Amysfield,  omnibus  et  singulis  terris  suis  de  Dalruskane. 
"  cum  pertinen.  jacen.  infra  vicecomit.  nostrum  de  Dumfreis,  de  mandato  nostro 
•'  visam,  lectam,  &-C.  Apud  Edinburgum  quinto  die  mensis  Aprilis,  anno  Do- 
"  mini  millesimo  quadringentesimo  octuagesimo  primo,  et  regni  noetri  vicesimo 
"  primoJ' 

Carta  confirmationis  Roberto  Charters  de  Amysfield. 

"  Jacobus,  Dei  gratia,  rex  Scotorum  (f).  Sciatis  nos,  nostrique  consilii  dominos, 
"  clare  coguoscentes  et  ^considerantes  quandam  cartam  quondam  serenissimi  patris 

{a)  7th  Book,  Ta.  III.  No.  107.  (b)  7th  Book,  Ja.  III.  No.  120.  (0  7th  Book,  No.  no. 
(</)  o.b  Bo"ok,  Ja.  III.  No.  ,7,     (<•)  :3th  Book,  Ja.  IV.  No.  470. 


136  APPENDIX. 

"  nostii  bon;£  memoriae,  cujus  animie  propetietur  Deus,  hereditarie  factam  ct 
"  comessam  dilecto  et  fideli  armigero  nostro  Roberto  Charters  de  Amisfield,  pro 
"  certis  honourabilis  et  laudabilis  causis  in  ipsa  carta  specificatis,  de  et  super  qua- 
"  tuor  mercatas  terrarum  de  Polmtree,  cum  pertinen.  jaceii.  in  dominio  nostro 
"  Galvvidie,  infra  senescallatum  nostrum  de  Kirkcudbright,  de  mandate  nostro 
"  visam,  lectam,  S<-c.  ut  in  carta  precedenti.  N.  i.  Quamquidem  cartam  ac  do- 
"  nationem,  et  concessionem  in  eadem  content,  prefato  Roberto  super  predictis 
"  terris  de  Polmtree  cum  pertinen.  ut  premittitur  factam,  in  omnibus  suis  punctis 
"  et  articulis,  conditionibus  et  modis,  ac  circumstantiis  suis  quiDuscunque  forma 
"  pariter  et  etTectu,  in  omnibus  et  per  omnia  nos,  cum  avisamento  dominorum  nostri 
"  consilii,  approbamus,  ratificamus,  et  pro  nobis  et  successoribus  nostris  pro  per- 
"  petuo  confirmando  donamus,  et  donando  confirmamas,  salvis  nobis  et  successori- 
"  bus  nostris  servitiis  de  dictis  terris,  cum  pertinen.  ante  predict,  confirmationem 
"  et  donationem,  nobis  debitis  et  consuetis,  Stc.  Apud  Edinburgum  sexto  die 
"  mensis  Augustii,  anno  Domini  millesimo  quingentesimo  primo,  et  regni  nostri 
"  decimo  quarto. 


VII. 

Carta  Joannis  Charters  de  Amysfield. 

"  Maria,  Dei  gratia,  regina  Scotorum,  &.c.  («).  Sciatis  nos,  cum  avisamento  et 
consensu  clarissimi  consanguine!  et  tutoris  nostri  Jacobi  ducis  de  Chattellarault, 
Arania;  comitis,  domini  Hamilton,  regni  nostri  protectoris  et  gubernatoris,  de- 
disse,  concessisse,  et  hac  presenti  carta  nostra,  confirmasse  Joanni  Charters  de 
Amysfield  et  Jonete  Douglas  ejus  conjuge,  et  eorum  alteri  diutius  viventi,  in 
conjuncta  infeodatione,  et  heredibus  inter  ipsos  legitime  procreatis,  sen  procrean- 
dis,  quibus  deticientibus,  legitimis  et  propinquioribus  heredibus  dicti  Joannis 
quibuscunque,  totas  et  integras  decern  libratas  terrarum  de  Dalrusken,  cum  per- 
tinen. jacen.  infra  vicecomitatum  de  Dumfreis :  Quequidem  terrae  prescript,  cum 
pertinentiis  dicto  Joanni  perprius  hereditarie  pertinuerunt,  et  quas  idem  per 
fustum  et  baculum  in  manibus  prefati  nostri  gubernatoris,  tanquam  in  manibus 
nostris  apud  Edinburgum  personaliter  sursum  reddidit,  et  simpliciter  resignavit, 
&.C.  tenen.  de  nobis,  reddendo  jura  et  servitia  debita  et  consueta.  Apud  Edin- 
burgum decimo  quarto  die  mensis  Februarii,  anno  Domini  millesimo  quingen- 
tesimo quinquagesimo  tertio,  et  regni  nostri  undecimo. 

VIII. 

Carta  domini  Joannis  Charters  de  Amysfield  militis. 

"  Jacobus,  Dei  gratia,  rex  Scotorum,  &c.  Sciatis  nos  dedisse,  concessisse,  dis- 
posuisse,  sic.  dilecto  nostro  domino  J[oanni  Charters  de  Amysfield,  heredibus 
suis,  et  assignatis  quibuscunque,  hereditaria,  totas  et  integras  terras  de  Tinwald, 
cum  turrge,  fortalicio,  molendinis,  &-c.  Extenden.  ad  viginti  libiatas  terrarum  an- 
tiqui  extentus,  cum  advocatione,  donatione  et  jure  patronatus  ecclesiae  de  Tyn- 
wald,  jacen.  infra  vicecomit.  de  Dumfreis;  quasquidem  terras,  &.c.  perprius  ad  Ro- 
bertum  vicecomitem  de  Rochester  hereditariae  pertinuerunt,  et  quas  ipse,  &c.  per 
fustum  et  baculum  apud  Edinburgum  resignavit,  cum  omni  jure,  titulo,  &c.  in  fa- 
vorem  dicti  domini  Joannis  Charters  de  Amysfield,  heredum  suorum  et  assigna- 
torum  antedict.  proque  hoc  novo  nostro  infeofamento,  per  nos,  nostro  sub  magno 
sigillo  ipsis  desuper  dan.  et  conceden.  Insuper  nos,  pro  bono,  fideli  et  gratuito 
servitio  nobis,  et  preclarissimis  nostris  progenitoribus,  per  dictum  dominura  Jo- 
annem  Charters,  ejusque  predecessores,  temporibus  retroactis,  prestito,  et  im- 
penso,  £ic.  nee  non  pro  diversis  aliis  bonis  causis  et  considerationibus,  nos  mcven. 
ex  nostro  proprio  motu  certaque  scientiae,  de  novo  damns,  &c.  Tenen.  de  no- 
bis et  successoribus  nostris,  in  feodo  et  hereditate  in  perpetuum,  &c.  reddendo 

(a)   2ist  900k,  Maria  Reg.  No.  133. 


APPENDIX.  137 

**  jura  et  servitia  prius  debita  et  consucta.     Apud  Greenwich  in  Anglia,  vicesimo 
"■  die  mensis  Maii,  161 1." 


IX. 

Cm-tn  domini  Joannis  Charters  de  Amysfield,  mi/itis. 

"  Jacobus,  Dei  gratia,  Magns  Britannia;,  Franciae  et  Hiberniae  rex,  Stc.  Sciatis 
"  nos  dedisse,  concessisse  et  disposuisse,  tenoreque  presentis  carta;  nostra  dare, 
"  concedere  et  disponere  predilecto  nostro  domino  Joanni  Charters  de  AmysHeid, 
"  suisque  heredibus  mascuHs,  de  corpore  suo  legitime  procreatis  sen  procreandis, 
"  quibas  delkientibus,  suis  legirimis  et  propinquioribus  heredibus  mascuhs  quibus- 
"  cunque,  cognomen  et  arniade  Charters  gerentibus  hereditaria,  omnes  etsmgulas 
"  terras  et  baroniam  de  Amysfield,  et  terras  de  Dalruskane,  &-c.  jacen.  intra  vice- 
"  comitat.deDumfreis;  nee  nontotaset  integras  terras  de  Duchray,  cum  molendinis, 
"  &c.  jacen.  infra  senescallatum  de  Kirkcudbright,  et  viceconiitatum  de  Dumtreis; 
"  quequidem  terrce,  baronia,  molendina,  ac  alia  prescript,  cum  pertinen.  perprius 
"  prefato  domino  Joanni  Charters  hereditarias  pertinuerunt,  et  quas  ipse,  cf-c. 
"  Apud  Edinburgum  per  fustum  et  baculum  resignavit,  &c.  pro  hac  nova  nostra 
"  carta  et  infeodatione  hereditaria  sibi  dicto  domino  Joanni,  suisque  heredibus  mas- 
"  culis  et  tailzie  respective,  nostro  sub  magno  sigillo  desup.  danda  et  concedenda 
"  in  debita  forma,  sub  provisione  et  conditione  tamen,  quod  casu  defectus  hereduni 
"  masculorum  legitime,  et  corpore  proprio  dicti  domini' Joannis  procreat.  et  ideo 
"  quod  heredes  antedict.  talhse  sibi  in  antedictis  terris  succederunt,  quod  diet,  he- 
*'  redes  talliae  in  dictis  terris  succedentes  tenebuntur,  persolvere  heredibus  fcEmin. 
"  dicti  domini  Joannis  nomine  provisionis,  si  una  sit  solumodo  summam  decern 
"  miUium  mercarum,  et  si  plures  sint,  summam  viginti  millium  mercarum,  usualis 
*♦  monetae  regni  nostri  Scotiae,  equaliter  inter  ipsos :  Insuper  nos  pro  bono  fideli  et 
"  gratuito  servitio  nobis  per  prefatum  dominum  Joannem  Charters  de  Amysfield, 
"  tanquam  unum  nostrum  commissionariorum  de  lie  Middleshearis,  nuper  confines 
"  he  borders  Scotire  nuncupat.  prestito  et  impenso,  ac  pro  diversis  aliis  magnis  re- 
"  spectibus,  et  bone  considerationibus  nos  moven,  de  novo  damns  prefato  domino 
"  Joanni,  suisque  heredibus  masculis  et  tallia  predict,  totas  et  integras  predictas 
"  terras  et  baroniam  de  Amysfield,  &.c.  (particularly  bounded  as  contained  fully 
"  in  the  charter)  cum  advocatione  et  donatione,  et  jus  patronatus  viccariarum 
"  ecclesiarum  de  Balmaghie,  Trailflat,  et  Drumgray,  &c.  Tenen.  de  nobis  et  succes- 
"  soribus  nostris  in  feodo,  hereditate  ac  libera  baronia  in  perpetuum,  &-c.  Red- 
"  dendo  jura  et  servitia  per  prius  debita  et  consueta.  Apud  Edinburgum,  vige- 
"  simo  octavo  die  mensis  Novembris.  anno  Domini  millesimo  sexcentesimo  quinto, 
"  ac  regnorum  nostrorunx  annis  trigesimo  nono  et  tertio." 


Carta  domini  Joannis  Charters  de  Amysfield,  ??iilitis,  et  Margaretce  Fleyming  ejiw 
conjugi. 

"  Jacobus,  Dei  gratia,  Magnae  Britanniae,  Franciae  et  Hiberniffi  rex,  &-c.  («).  Sciatis 
nos,  cum  avisamento.  Sic.  dedisse,  concesisse  et  disposuisse,  &-C.  dilectis  nostris 
domino  Joanni  Charters  de  Amisfield  militi,  et  dominaa  Margarets  Fleming  ejus 
conjugi,  eorumque  alteri  diutius  viventi  in  conjuncta  infeodatione,  ac  heredibus 
masculis  inter  ipsos  legitime  procreatis  seu  procreandis,  quibus  deficien.  dicti  do- 
mini Joannis  heredibus  masculis  quibuscunque,  omnes  et  singulas  terras  et  baro- 
niam de  Kirkmichael,  comprehenden.  villam  et  terras  de  Kirkmichael,  molendi- 
dum  et  terras  molendinarias  earundem  cum  lie  Plewlands  earundem,  totas  et  in- 
tegras terras  de  Drysholme,  Bekhouse,  villam  de  Dryersdail,  Torwood,  Belheill, 
Belton,  et  Quais,  cam  turrse,  fortalicio,  £tc.  omnes  jacen.  infra  senescallatum  de 

(o)  Ja.  VI.  lib.  1615.  16,  17.  letter  H. 
Vol.    I.  5T 


ijS  APPENDIX. 

"  Annandale,  et  vicecomitatum  nostrum  de  Dumfreis :  Quequidem  terraa  et  baro- 
"  niae  ad  Willielmum  Kirkpatrick  de  Kirkmichael  hereditariEE  pertinuerunt,  ac 
"  per  eum,  &-c.  per  fustum  et  baculum,  ut  moris  est,  apud  Edinburgum  resignatae 
"  fuerunt,  &.c.  Preterea  nos  pro  bona,  fideli  et  gratuito  servitio,  nobis  et  predeces- 
"  soribus  nostris,  per  dictum  dominum  Joannem  ejusque  predecessoribus  prestito,  ac 
"  pro  certis  aliis  causis,  &c.  et  de  novo  dedimus,  et  pro  perpetuo  confirmaraus,  dictis 
"  domino  Joanni  Charters  et  dominae  Margaret*  Fleyming  ejus  conjugi,  eorumque 
"  alteri  diutius  viventi  in  conjuncta  infeodatione,  ac  heredibus  masculis  inter  eos 
"  legitime  procreatis  seu  procreandis,  quibus  deficien.  omnes  et  singulas  terras  et 
"  baroniam  de  Kirkmichael,  &.c.  jacen.  ut  supra,  tenen.  de  nobis  et  successoribus 
"  nostris  in  feodo  et  hereditate,  ac  libera  baronia,  in  perpetuum,  per  omnes  certas 
"  metas,  6tc.  Reddendo  nobis  et  successoribus  nostris  jura,  servitia  et  divorias  ab 
"  antiquo  usitat.  et  consuetis.  Apud  Edinburgum  nono  die  mensis  Januarii,  anno 
"  Domini  millesimo  sexcentesimo  decim.o  septirao,  et  regnorum  nostrorura  annis 
«  quinquagesimo  et  deeimo  quarto." 


Carta  domim  Joannis  Charters  de  Amysfield.. 

"  Jacobus,  Dei  gratia,  Magnas  Britannise,  Franciie  et  HiberniiE  rex,  &c.  («)., 
"  Sciatis  nos,  cum  avisamento,  &.c.  dare,  concedere  et  disponere,  &c.  predilecto 
"  nostro  domino  Joanni  Charters  de  Amysfield  equiti  aurato,  nee  non  heredibus. 
"  masculis  inter  ipsum  et  quondam  dominam  Margaretam  Fleyming  ejus  sponsam 
'<  legitime  procreatis,  quibus  deficientibus,  heredibus  masculis  dicti  domini  Joannis 
"  quibuscunque,  hereditarie,  omnes  et  singulas  decem  libratas  terrarum  de  Kirk- 
"  raichael,  cum  molendino  et  terris  de  Plewlands  (ut  in  predicta  carta)  et  qua- 
"  draginta  solidatas  terrarum  de  Cragshiel  et  Dalorum,  terras  de  Over  et  Nether 
"  Glenkills,  extend,  ad  sex  mercatas  terrarum,  quadraginta  solidatas  terrarum  de 
"  Hoilhouse  et  Deir,  terras  de  Gleimane,  extenden.  ad  dimidiam  mercatam  terrae, 
"  cum  turribus,  fortaliciis,  &-c.  cum  officio  balliatus  baroniae  de  Kirkmichael,  &-c. 
"  Quequidem  terrae  ad  Willielmum  Kirkpatrick  de  Kirkmichael  hereditarie  per- 
"  tinuerunt,  per  ipsum  de  nobis  immediate  tent,  ac  per  ipsura  resignati  fuerunt  in 
"  favorem  dicti  domini  Joannis  Charters  de  Amysfield,  &c.  (ut  supra)  tenen.  de 
"  nobis  et  successoribus  nostris  in  feodo  et  hereditate  in  perpetuum :  Reddendo 
"  wardam  et  releviam  eorum  heredum  quando  cadere  contigerint,  cum  omnibus 
"  aliis  juribus  et  servitiis,  de  predictis  terris  ante  predict,  resignationera  debitis  et 
"  consuetis.  Apud  Edinburgum  sexto  die  mensis  Junii,  anno  Domini  millesimo 
"  sexcentesimo  vigesimo  secundo,  regnorumque  nostrorum  annis  quinquagesimo 
"  quinto,  et  vigesimo." 


Carta  Joannis  Charters  junioris  de  Amysfield,  et  Catharine  Crichton  ejus  cmjugi. . 

"  Carolus,  Dei  gratia,  Magnae  Britanniae,  Franciae  et  Hiberniae  rex,  &c.  (b').  Sci- 
atis nos,  cum  avisamento,  &.c.  dedisse,  &-c.  dilectae  nostrae  magistrae,  Catharinae 
Crichton  conjugi  Joannis  Charters  junioris  de  Amisfield  in  vitali  reditu,  pro  om- 
nibus suae  vitae  diebus,  totas  et  integras  terras  de  Drumgreen,  fitc  et  similiter  de- 
disse, £ic.  prefato  Joanni  Charters  junioris  de  Amisiield  et  heredibus  masculis  in- 
ter ipsum  et  diet,  suam  conjugem  legitime  procreatis  seu  procreandis,  quibus  de- 
ficien. legitimis  et  propinquioribus  heredibus  suis  masculis  et  assignatis  quibuscun- 
que hereditarie,  totas  et  integras  terras  et  baroniam  de  Amisfield,  in  se  continen. 
dominicales  de  Amisfield,  cum  domibus,  8m:.  nunc  in  unum  liberum  burgum  ba- 
ronia erect,  cum  foro  hepdomedario  die  Jovis  tenen.  et  libero  nundino  ejusdem 
anuatini  die  mensis  Septembris  vocat.  festum  Sancti  Michaelis 

(a)  Ja.  VI.  lib.  21.  l6;2,  23,  24:  and  1625.         C^)  Car.  I-  lib.  1634,  5,  6.  &  7.  letters  D.  D.  D. 


APPENDIX.  139 

■  tenen.  ac  cum  omnibus  et  singulis  privilegiis,  libcrtatibus,  toUoniis,  custumis,  casu- 

■  alitatibus,  proficuis,  et  divoriis  pertmen.  tt  spcctan.  ditto  buigo  baronine  foiis  hep- 
doniodariis,  et  liberis  nundinis,  ejud.  cum  molcndinode  Amisiield,  terns  molendi- 
nariis,  et  multuris  ejusd.  jacen.  (ut  in  predictis  cartis);  nee  non  totas  et  integras 
qiwtuor  mercatas  terrarum  de  Polmentrie,  cum  pertinen.  jacen.  infia  dominium 
nostnim  de  Galloway;  ac  etiam  totas  et  integras  viginti  duaslibratas  terrarum  de 
Drysdail,  comprehenden.  viliam  et  terras  de  Drysliolme,  Bckhouse  villam  de 
Drysdail,  &.c.  jacen.  intra  sentscallatum  de  Annandale;  quequidem  terne,  baro- 
ni;^,  molendina,  silvx,  piscariai,  aliaque,  supra  mentionat.  cum  omnibus  suis  par- 
tibus,  pendiculis  et  pertinentiis  antedict.  ad  dictum  dominum  Joannem  Charters 
de  Amisfield  militem,  per  prius  hereditarie  pertinuerimt,  per  ipsum  de  nobis  im- 
niediate  tent,  ac  per  ipsum  suosque  Icgitimos  procuratores  ejus  nomine  reiignat. 
tuerunt,  in  favorem  proque  novo  hoc  nostro  infeofamento  sub  nostro  magno  sigillo, 
de  integris  terris  et  baroniis  aliisque  prescript,  pretato  domino  Joanni  Charters, 
suisqne  antedict.  in  debita  et  competenti  forma  desuper  dan.  et  comedeu.  &-c. 
Preterea  no?,  cum  avisamento  et  consensu,  &c.  de  novo  damus,  &c.  magistrse 
Catharinae  Criclnon  in  vitali  redditu,  &c.  terras  de  Drumgreen,  &-c.  Et  simili- 
ter de  novo  damus  prefato  Joanni  Charters,  heredibus  suis  masculis  tallise,  &-c. 
omnes  et  singulas  terras,  et  baroniam  de  Amisfield  in  se  continen.  &-c.  et  terras 
de  Polmentrie,  Kirkmichael,  &.c.  omnes  unit,  et  erect,  in  unam  integram  et  li- 
beram  baroniam,  nunc,  et  omni  tempore  a  futuro  baroniam  de  Amisfield  nun- 
cupand.  ordinan.  turrum,  fortalicium  et  manerei  locum  de  Amisfield,  principale 
fore  me^uagium  dicta:  baronia?,  fiic.  tenen.  et  haben.  &.c.  de  nobis  et  successori- 
bus  nostris,  in  feodo  licreditate  et  libera  baronia  in  perpetuuni,  per  omnes  rectas 
metas,  &c.  reddendo,  S^c.  jura  et  servitia  debita  et  consueta.  In  cujus  rei  testi- 
monium, &.C.  Apud  Edinburgum,  decimo  quinto  die  mensis  Decembris,  anno 
millesimo  sexcentesimo  trigesimo  quarto,  anno  regni  nostri  decimo." 


Carta  Josephi  Charteris  de  Buchrie. 

"  Carolus,  Die  gratia,  Magnae  Britanniae,  Francias  et  HibernifE  rex,  &-c.  Sciatis 
"  nos  cum  avisamento,  £ic.  dedisse,  concessisse  et  disposuisse,  &-c.  ad  et  in  favorem 
"  dilecti  nostri  Josephi  Charteris  filii  legitime  Roberti  Charters,  fratris  gennani  do- 
"  mini  Joannis  Charters  de  Amisfield  militis,  heredum  suorum  et  assignatorum  quo- 
"  rumcunque  hereditarie,  totas  et  integras  terras  de  Diichrie,  extenden.  ad  decern 
"  libratas  terrarum  antiqui  extentus,  continen.  et  comprehenden.  in  se  terras  de  Tor- 
"  norroch,  &c.  Qj^iequidem  terra,  molendini,  piscationes,  aliaque  prescript,  cum 
"  pertinen.  per  prius  hereditarie  pertinuerunt  ad  diet,  dominum  Joannem  Charters 
"  de  Amisfield  militem,  et  Joannem  Charters  suum  filium  feodatarium  ejusd.  per 
"  eos  de  nobis  immediate  tent,  et  que  terrte  resignata;  fuerunt  per  illos  cum  con- 
"  sensu  Georgii  Rome  de  Kirkpatrick  Irongray,  pro  suo  interesse,  &c.  Apud 
"  Edinburgum  in  favorem  dicti  Josephi  Charters  ejusque  predict,  proque  hoc  novo 
<'  nostro  infeofamento  et  sasina  desuper  danda  et  concedenda  illi  de  diet,  terris  et 
"  molendinis,  &c.  tenen.  et  haben.  &c.  de  nobis  et  successoribus  nostris,  in  feodo 
"  et  hereditate  in  perpetuum,  per  omnes  rectas  metas,  &c.  reddendo,  &c.  jura,  et 
"  servitia  et  divorias  prius  solvi  solit.  et  consuet.  In  cujus  rei  testimonium,  &c. 
"  Apud  Edinburgum,  vigesirao  die  mensis  Martii,  anno  Domini  millesimo  sexcen- 
"  tesimo  trigesimo  septimo,  et  anno  regni  nostri  duodecimo." 

By  the  writs  above  deduced  it  appears  evidently  that  the  family  of  Amisfield  has 
continued  in  the  name  of  Charteris  from  King  Robert  Bruce  to  this  day. 

And  since  all  the  writs  above  mentioned  do  not  particularly  name  the  ladies  of 
that  family,  or  of  whom  they  are  descended,  I  thought  it  would  not  be  improper 
to  condescend  upon  their  names  and  surnames,  so  far  as  history  mentions  thera  ; 
ajid  particularly  Mr  George  Crawfurd  in  his  History  of  the  Peerage  of  Scotland. 

The  first  I  find  is  Agnes  Maxwell  (a)  second  daughter  to   John   Lord  Max- 

(o)  Peerage,  page  371. 


140 


APPENDIX. 


well,  by  Agnes,  daughter  to  Sir  Alexander  Stewart  of  Garlics.  This  lady  was  mar- 
ried to  Sir  Robert  Charteris  of  Amisfield,  about  the  year  1494,  in  the  reign  of  King 
James  IV. 

The  second  lady  mentioned  in  history  is  Janet  Douglas  (Z>),  eldest  daughter  to 
Sir  James  Douglas  of  Drumianrig,  by  Margaret  Douglas,  daughter  of  George, 
Master  of  Angus.  This  Lady  was  married  to  John  Charteris  of  Amisfield,  about 
the  year  1530,  in  the  reign  of  King  James  V.  and  in  the  year  1553,  there  is  a 
charter  granted  by  Qvieen  Mary  in  favour  of  Sir  John  and  the  said  lady,  of  the 
ten-pound  land  of  Dalruskan,  as  noted  in  the  7th  ch'arter  of  this  memorial. 

The  third  lady  mentioned  in  history  is  Lady  Margaret  Fleming,  third  daughter 
to  John  first  Earl  of  Wigton,  by  Lady  Lilias  Graham,  daughter  to  John  Earl  of 
Montrose.  This  lady  was  married  to  Sir  John  Charteris  of  Amisfield,  about  the 
1610,  in  the  reign  of  King  James  VI.;  and  in  the  year  1617  there  is  a  charter 
granted  by  King  James  Vi.  in  favour  of  the  said  Sir  John  and  the  said  Lady  Mar- 
garet, of  the  lands  and  barony  of  Kirkmichael,  &c.  as  noted  in  the  loth  charter 
of  this  memorial. 

The  fourth  lady  mentioned  in  history  is  Lady  Katharine  Crichton,  second 
daughter  to  William  first  Earl  of  Dumfries,  by  Euphame  Seaton,  daughter  to 
James  Seaton  of  Touch.  This  lady  was  married  to  Sir  John  Charteris,  younger 
of  Amisfield,  about  the  year  1633,  in  the  reign  of  King  Charles  I.  And  there  is 
a  charter  granted  by  King  Charles  1.  in  favour  of  the  said  Sir  John  and  lady  Ka- 
tharine, and  the  heu-s-male  of  their  bodies,  of  the  lands  and  barony  of  Amisfield; 
&-C.  erecting  the  village  of  Amisfield  into  a  burgh  of  barony,  with  several  privileges, 
such  as  weekly  markets,  yearly  fairs,  &c.  as  in  charter  1 2.  of  this  memorial,  con- 
taining also  a  tailzie  in  favour  of  heirs-male,  and  in  case  of  an  heir-female  redeem- 
able from  her  for  payment  of  10,000  merks  Scots. 

The  records  of  this  kingdom  being  carefully  searched,  and  thexe  being  no  other 
family  of  the  name  of  Charteris  before  the  first  mentioned  Robert,  great-grand- 
father to  Robert,  in  whose  favour  the  first  charter  on  record  is  granted,  it  may  be 
reasonably  conjectured,  that  all  the  gentlemen  of  that  name  have  sprung  from  the 
honourable  family  of  Charteris  of  Amisfield,  whereof  there  are  some  mentioned  in 
rlie  records,  viz. 

I.  Charter  in  favour  of  Thomas  Chakteris  (c),  of  the  lands  of  Halton,  Pit- 
morthie,  and  Craigamore,  lying  in  the  barony  of  Lumphynhanan,  in  the  shire  of 
Aberdeen  ;  and  of  all  and  hail  the  lands  of  Kinfauns  and  Pitfundy,  lying  in  the 
barony  of  Kinfauns,  in  the  shire  of  Perth,  upon  the  resignation  of  Sir  WiUiam 
Charters  of  Cragmore,  his  father,  dated  15th  June  1487. 

,  1.  Charter  in  favour  of  Andrew  Charteris,  (designed)  Provost  of  the  burgh  of 
Perth  (d),  of  all  and  haill  the  barony  of  Cuthillgourdy. 

3.  Litera  Magistri  Johannis  Chartems  Capitaneo  de  Gahtoun  terrarum  de  Len- 
ftn  {e). 

4.  And  in  the  same  book  of  King  James  IV.  there  is  a  charter  of  confirmation 
in  favour  of  John  Charteris,  of  the  lands  and  barony  of  Cuthillgourdy. 

5.  As  also  in  the  same  book  there  is  a  charter  of  confirmation  in  favour  of  An- 
drew Charteris  of  the  lands  of  Forgundefuy. 

6.  Charter  in  favour  of  John  Charteris  of  the  the  lands  and  barony  of  Cuthill- 
gourdy. 

7.  Charter  in  favour  of  John  Charteris  of  Kinfauns  (7")  of  the  lands  of  Golk- 
ton,  Ribno  and  Tullihou. 

8.  Charter  of  confirmation  in  favour  of  Alison  Charteris  of  the  lands  of  For- 
gundemy  (^). 

9.  Charter  in  favour  of  John  Charteris  of  Cuthillgourdy  {hi)  of  the  lands  of 
Drumnockqushiel  and  Drumquhasheil;  and  another  charter  in  his  favour  of  the 
lands  of  BaUatheis,  with  the  fishings  belonging  thereto ;  as  al$o  contains  the  lands' 
called  the  Mains  of  Kinclevine. 

ih)  Peerage,  page  416.  (f)  5th  Book,  K.  Ja.  III.  (</)  8th  Book,  K.  Ja.  III.  (0  13*'^  Book,  K. 
la.  IV.     (/)  20tU  Book,  K.  Ja.  V.     C^)  25th  Book,  K.  Ja.  V.     (A)  2t,th  Eook.K.  Ja.  V. 


APPENDIX.  r4r 

10.  Charter  in  favour  of  John  Ch.irters  of  Windyhills,  of  tlie  lands  of  Nether 
Kelwood  and  Bowerlands  (/'). 

11.  Charter  in  favour  of  AusoN  Charteris,  of  the  half  of  the  superiority  of  the 
lands  of  Kinclevine,  Ballatheis,  Drumnoquheill,  &c.  (k). 

12.  Charter  in  favour  of  Elizabeth  Charteris,  of  the  other  half  of  the  superi- 
ority of  the  lands  of  Kinclevine,  Ballatiieis,  Drummoqiihein,  &c.  (/). 

13.  Charter  in  favour  of  Alison  Ch.\rteris,  of  the  lands  and  barony  of  Kincle- 
vine, comprehending  other  lands  (ot). 

14.  Charter  of  confirmation  in  favour  of  John  Charteris  of  Kinfauns,  of  the- 
lands  and  village  of  Crosschapple,  with  the  teinds  belonging  thereto  («). 


LESLIE  OF  FlNDRASSIE, 


FOR  the  clearing  more  fully  and  effectually  the  right  of  primogeniture  the 
Leslies  of  Findrassie  have  to  the  family  of  Rothes,  and  setting  that  matter  in  a 
clearer  light  than  it  hath  hitherto  appeared,  it  will  be  proper  to  observe,  that  the 
noble  family  of  Rothes  were  not  raised  to  the  honour  and  quality  of  earls,  by  let- 
ters patent  erecting  their  lands  into  an  earldom  or  comltatum,  and  therein  specify- 
ing and  appointing  what  set  or  species  of  heirs  were  to  succeed  to  the  dignity  and 
estate,  but  by  cincture  and  investiture  in  Parliament :  For,  by  several  authentic 
vouchers,  which  we  have  seen  and  perused,  it  is  plain  and  evident,  that  George 
Lord  Leslie  upon  Leven,  as  he  is  called  in  several  deeds,  was  by  the  special  favour  of 
King  James  II.  created  and  raised  to  the  honour  of  Earl  of  Rothes  in  the  year  1459 
(0),  by  cincture  of  a  sword,  and  the  other  rites  and  solemnities  then  usual;  so 
an  honour,  after  that  manner  established,  devolves  for  ever  to  heirs-male  of  the  first 
patentee,  in  exclusion  of  heirs  of  line,  if  some  act  and  deed  of  the  sovereign,  the 
fountain  of  honour,  do  not  intervene,  altering  the  succession  from  heirs-male  to 
heirs-female,  as  was  the  case  in  the  family  of  Rothes ;  for,  in  the  1667,  John,  then 
Earl  of  Rothes,  afterwards  Duke  of  Rothes,  having  no  heirs-male  of  his  body, 
that  he  might  disappoint  the  succession  of  the  heir-male  of  George  the  first  Earl 
of  the  House  of  Rothes,  and  exclude  them  from  any  title  they  might  have  had  to- 
the  estate,  resigned  both  the  title,  honour,  dignity,  rank,  and  precedency  of  Earl 
of  Rothes,  in  the  hands  of  his  majesty  King  Charles  II.  in  favour  of  his  heirs- 
female,  in  failure  of  the  heirs-male  of  his  body,  whereupon  a  charter  was  expede 
under  the  Great  Seal  (p),  in  virtue  whereof,  Margaret  Countess  of  Rothes  suc- 
ceeded the  duke  her  father  in  the  title  of  Earl  of  Rothes,  on  his  death  in  the  year 
1.681. 

But  to  return  to  George  the  first  Earl  of  Rothes,  for  the  clearing  the  succession, 
and  bringing  down  the  line  of  the  tamily  of  Findrassie,  we  must  observe  that  this 
noble  earl,  by  Christian  his  wife,  daughter  of  Sir  Walter  Halyburton  Lord  of  Dirle- 
ton,  and  Andrew,  stiled  Master  of  Rothes,  who  in  the  lifetime  of  his  father  mar- 
ried Janet,  daughter  of  William  the  first  Earl  Marischal,  by  whom  he  had  two  sons, 
viz.  George,  who  was  his  grandfather's  successor  in  the  honour ;  but  he  dying 
without  issue-male,  was  succeeded  by  his  brother  William  Earl  of  Rothes,  who  was 
slain  at  the  battle  of  Flodden,  leaving  his  son  young  at  his  death,  George,  com- 
monly called  the  Great  Earl  of  Rothes.  This  earl  married  first  the  Lady  Margaret 
Crichton,  only  daughter  of  William  Lord  Crichton,  by  the  Lady  Cicely  his  wife, 
second  daughter  to  King  James  II.  of  Scotland.  She  was  not  a  natural  daughter 
of  the  Lord  Crichton's,  as  some  insinuate,  but  the  Lady  Cicely,  the  king's  daugh- 
ter, was  his  lawful  wife ;  and  it  is  plain,  that  he  was  not  forfeited  for  his  indecent 
correspondence  with  the  lady  before  her  marriage,  but  for  joining  with  the  Duke 

(0  30th  Book,  Maria  Reg.  (i)  31st  Book,  Maria  Reg.  (/)  Ditto  Book,  Maria  Reg.  (m)  Ditto 
Book,  Maria  Reg.    («)  33d  Book,  Q.  Mary.    (0)  Charta  in  publicis  archivis.    (^)  In  the  public  records. 

Vol.  n.  5  U 


i42  APPENDIX. 

of  Albany  in  his  unnatural  rebellion  against  his  hi-other   King  James  HI.  anno 
1483  (?)• 

The  family  of  Rothes  then  being  low,  Earl  George  married  this  Lady  Margaret 
Crichton,  then  the  widow  of  one  Mr  Paular  of  the  town  of  Montrose  :  She  was  a 
great  fortune,  and  lier  vast  estate  in  money  contributed  not  a  little  to  relieve  the 
family  from  the  great  burden  it  was  under,  and  put  it  in  that  condition  of  lustre 
it  still  continues :  But  this  lady  being  much  above  the  Earl  in  years,  he  commen- 
ced a  process  of  divorce  against  her  ;  but  it  is  certain  it  could  never  proceed  upon 
the  disparity  of  their  age  ;  for  that  was  a  reason  could  never  have  been  sustained  by 
the  canonists :  it  must  have  proceeded  upon  a  nullity  in  the  marriage  ab  initio,  and 
that  upon  the  score  of  consanguinity  that  had  not  been  dispensed  with  by  a  bull 
from  the  Court  of  Rome,  or  from  the  delegates  of  the  Apostolic  See  :  however,  in 
these  cases,  where  there  was  a  marriage  de  facto,  there  never  failed  a  clause  in 
these  divorces,  and  a  salvo  reserving  the  legitimacy  of  the  children  procreated  be- 
twixt the  parties,  even  though  the  marriage  was  declared  void  and  null  from  the 
beginning,  because  they  were  born  bona  fide,  and  the  defect  could  not  be  in  reason 
imputed  to  them.  The  Earl,  however,  we  are  certain,  proceeded  to  a  second  mar- 
riage with  Dame  Nicolas  Somerville,  dowager  Lady  Fleming,  daughter  of  Sir 
John  Somerville  of  Cambusnethan,  by  whom  he  had  Andrew,  afterwards  Earl  of 
Rothes.  After  the  death  of  this  lady,  he  married  next  the  Lady  Dowager  of  Craw- 
ford, who  was  a  daughter  of  the  House  of  Lundie,  and  after  that  a  daughter  of 
the  Lord  Gray,  who  was  widow  both  to  the  Lord  Glammis  and  the  Earl  of  Huntly; 
tut  these  ladies  living  very  short  while,  from  a  conviction,  it  seems,  of  the  in- 
justice he  had  done  to  his  first  lady.  Lady  Margaret  Crichton,  he  married  her  ca- 
nonically,  according  to  the  rules  of  the  church  then  in  being,  and  made  her,  all  im- 
pediments being  removed,  his  lawful  wife,  as  she  is  designed,  and  Comitissa  de 
Rothes,  in  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal  in  the  year  1542,  which  is  in  the  public 
records  (/).  And  so  much  is  certain,  that  the  children  procreate  betwixt  the  Earl, 
of  Rothes  and  the  Lady  Margaret  Crichton  were  so  far  considered  as  lawful,  that 
their  eldest  son,  Norman  Leslie,  was  stiled  and  designed  in  all  pubhc  acts  and 
deeds  Master  of  Rothes,  and  fiar  of  the  earldom  of  Rothes  (/).  This  Norman  was 
a  noble  gallant  young  man ;  but  all  these  excellent  qualities  and  endowments  he 
was  possessed  of  were  miserably  sullied  by  his  imbruing  his  hands  in  the  blood 
and  murder  of  Cardinal  Beaton,  archbishop  of  St  Andrews,  in  the  year  1546, 
for  which  he  was  forfeited ;  and  the  father,  by  some  act  and  deed  of  the  crown 
that  I  have  not  seen,  came  to  be  fully  invested  in  the  estate  of  the  earldom  him- 
self, and  had  it  in  his  own  power  to  dispose  of  it  to  any  of  his  sons  of  his  different 
marriages  he  had  a  mind.  His  younger  son,  Robert  Leslie,  by  Lady  Margaret 
Crichton,  was  the  first  of  the  Leslies  of  the  House  of  Findrassie,  who  had  these 
lands  in  patrimony  from  his  father,  while  Norman,  Master  of  Rothes,  his  elder 
brother  was  ahve,  and  who  was  of  the  full  blood  with  himself.  It  is  strange  he 
did  not  succeed  his  father  in  the  earldom  of  Rothes  ;  but  it  is  plain  it  was  not 
from  any  impediment  in  his  birth,  but,  as  Bishop  Leslie  tells  us,  from  the  special" 
favour  of  the  Duke  of  Chattelherault,  while  he  was  regent  of  Scotland  in  tlie  mi- 
nority of  Queen  Mary,  that  the  fee  of  the  estate,  and  the  heritable  offices  of  the 
family,  came  all  to  be  vested  in  the  person  of  Andrew  Leslie  of  Kilmeny,  as  he  is 
designed  ;  and  the  earl's  second  son,  by  charters  under  the  Great  seal,  on  the  sur- 
render and  resignation  of  the  Earl  his  father,  and  to  whom,  by  virtue  of  these  in- 
vestitures, he  succeeded  both  in  the  estate  and  honour  at  his  death  on  the  loth 
of  November  1558.  The  only  reason  why  that  Robert  Leslie  of  Findrassie,  who 
was,  as  we  have  said,  the  son  of  George  Earl  of  Rothes  by  Lady  Margaret  Crich- 
ton, could  not  quarrel  in  point  of  law  his  brother  Andrew's  succession,  was,  that 
the  investiture  of  the  estate  was  the  rule  of  regulating  the  succession  to  the  estate, 
as  well  as  the  descent  of  the  honour  in  those  days ;  and  these  were  all  ratified  and 
confirmed  to  him  by  charters  passed  and  expede  under  the  Great  Seal  many  years 
before  his  father's  death ;  for,  in  those  days,  it  was  no   singular  case  in  the  family 

(y)  The  process  is  extant  in  the  registers  of  Parliament,  and  it  proceeds  upon  his  having  stuffed^  that 
js,  fortified  his  Castle  of  Crichton  against  the  king,  (r)  In  the  writs  of  the  Privy  Seal,  (j)  This  is 
vouched  bcth  from  the  public  archives  and  the  histories  of  the  time. 


APPENDIX.  14s, 

of  Rothes  to  di\ert  the  succession  from  the  right  channel  to  heirs  more  remote  ; 
for,  about  this  very  time,  David,  dien  Earl  of  Crawfoi'd,  disinherited  his  own  son, 
and  resigned  the  tee  of  the  earldom  of  Crav^'ford,  in  favour  of  Sir  David  Lindsay 
of  Edziell,  who  accordingly  "succeeded  at  tiie  earl's  death,  both  to  the  estate  and 
honour  of  the  House  of  Crawford.  The  reason  of  all  this  high  degree  of  favour 
shown  by  thje  Duke  of  Ghattelherault  to  the  Earl  of  Rothes's  son,  Andrew  Leslie, 
by  Dame  Nicolas  Somerville,  was,  that  he  had  married  Grissel  Hamilton  his  niece, 
daughter  of  Sir  James  Hamilton  of  Finnast  and  Evandale,  iiis  natural  brother,  to 
whose  memory  he  had,  during  his  whole  administration,  shown  the  highest  regard; 
for,  immediately  upon  his  accession  to  the  regency,  he  reduced  his  forfeiture  in  the 
Parliament  1543.  and  got  his  son  restored  to  his  estate,  and  his  daughter  married 
to  the  Earl  of  Rotlies's  son,  and  the  succession  both  of  the  estate  and  the  honour 
settled  on  them  and  their  heirs. 

Robert  Leslie  of  Findrassie,  the  Earl  of  Rothes's  son,  married  Janet,  daughter 
of  Robert  Lord  Elphijistone,  by  whom  he  had  Robert  his  successor. 

Robert  Leslie  of  Findrassie,  who  married  Margaret,  Daughter  of  Alexander 
Dunbar,  Dean  of  Murray,  one  of  the  Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice  in  the 
reign  of  King  James  VL  ancestor  to  Dunbar  of  Grange,  and  had  Robert  and  John, 
of  whom  the  present  Findrassie.  This  Robert  married  Isabel  Forbes,  daughter  to 
Abraham  Forbes  of  Blackton,  sixth  son  to  William  Lord  Forbes,  by  Elizabeth  his 
wife,  daughter  and  one  of  the  two  co-heirs  of  Sir  William  Keith  of  Inverugie,  by 
whom  he  had  George,  his  eldest  son,  who  died  without  succession,  and  Abraham 

the  second  son;  which  George  married  Mary,  daughter  of Bannerman 

of  Waterton,  but  died  without  issue.  Abraham  succeeded  his  brother,  and  died 
without  issue,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  great  nephew  John  LesHe,  now  of  Fin- 
drassie, second  son  to  Robert  Leslie   the  second  Laird  of  Findrassie ;  which  John 

married  Janet,  daughter   of Nairn  of  Cromdale,  and   had  John 

his  son,  who  married  Grissel,  daughter  of  John  Douglas  of  Tilliquhally,  a  cadet  of 
the  family  of  Morton,  even  since  the  house  of  Lochleven  succeeded  to  that  ho- 
nour and  dig.nity,  and  had  John  Leslie,  now  of  Findrassie,  who  married  Mar- 
garet, daughter  of  Charles  Gordon  of  Glengorock,  and  had  Alexander  his  son  and 
heir. 

As  to  the  coat  of  ajrms  given  to  George  Leslie  of  Findrassie,  by  Sir  Charles 
Erskine  the  Lord  Lyon,  I  cannot  say  but  it  was  a  very  proper  cognizance  he  took 
from  the  family  of  Rothes ;  for,  to  be  sure,  the  bordure  cheque  was  a  distinction  too 
remote  for  an  imediate  son  of  the  house  ;  but  it  is  plain  the  cheque  bordure  has 
been  taken  to  keep  up  the  memory  of  his  descent  from  the  royal  family  of  Stewart, 
of  which  he  had  the  honour  to  be  descended  so  nearly  by  his  predecessor's  grand- 
mother, being  the  second  lawful  daughter  of  King  James  U.  just  as  we  find  the 
Maxwells  of  Calderwood  carry  the  paternal  coat  of  Maxwell  within  a  bordure  cheque, 
azure  and  argent,  by  reason  that  the  first  of  the  family  of  Calderwood  was  Sir 
Robert  IVLaxwell,  second  son  of  Sir  John  Maxwell  of  Pollock,  by  Elizabeth  his 
wife,  daughter  of  Sir  James  Lindsay  Lord  of  Crawford,  and  of  the  Lady  Edgidia 
his  wife,  daughter  of  Walter,  Great  Steward  of  Scotland,  and  sister  to  King  Robert 
II. ;  so  that  as  the  first  Sir  Robert  Maxwell  of  Calderwood  assumed  the  cheque  as  his. 
cognizance,  to  show  his  descent  from  the  royal  family,  so  did  the  Laird  of  Findras- 
sie the  same  to  show  that  his  predecessor's  grandmother  was  of  the  royal  family, 
w'no  we  know  was  the  Lady  Cicely,  the  second  lawful  daughter  of  King  James  II. 
and,  next  to  the  House  of  Hamilton,  the  nearest  descendants  of  the  royal  House  of 
the  Stewarts,  that  are  not  descended  of  King  James  VI.  the  first  monarch  of  Great 
Britain. 


BANNERMAN  of  that  Ilk. 


THE  surname  of  Baxxerman  derives  its  original  from  the  office  of  banner-bear- 
er to  the  king,  and  he  who  bore  the  banner  before  King  Malcolm  ill.  when  he 


144  APPENDIX. 

was  going  against  the  rebels  in  Murray-Land,  who,  finding  him  cowardly  in  not 
attacking  them,  took  the  standard  from  him,  and  gave  it  to  Sir  Alexander  Carron, 
ancestor  to  Viscount  Scrimgeour  of  Dundee.  See  Boetius  about  anno  1180.  For 
which  cowardice  (says  Sir  George  Mackenzie  in  his  Genealogical  Account  of  the 
Families  in  Scotland)  he  and  his  successors  were  ordained  in  all  time  coming  to 
bear  in  their  coat  of  arms  a  banner,  with  the  staff  of  it  broken,  whereof,  being 
ashamed,  they  forbore  to  carry  any  arms  at  all  for  many  ages,  till  of  late  they  as- 
sumed these  of  Forbes,  with  some  difference,  because  of  their  frequent  alliance 
with  that  surname. 

Ba:^nerman  of  Waterton,  thereafter  of  Elsick,  began  to  use  the  old  coat  of 
Bannerman,  without  the  mark  of  dishonour,  thus,  gules,  a  banner  displayed  argent, 
and  thereon  in  a  canton  azure,  a  St  Andrew's  cross  of  the  second  j  and,  for  his  crest, 
a  man  in  armour,  proper.  Motto,  Pro  patria.  See  Sir  George  Mackenzie,  and 
Volume  Fh-st  of  this  System. 

Andrew  Bannerman  gives  a  charter  to  Henry  Mercer  of  Lydenoch,  of  the  lands, 
of  Wester-Cardeny  lying  in  the  barony  of  Logic,  and  shire  of  Perth ;  this  is  dated 
9th  July  1 54 1,  in publica  custodia. 

William  Bannerman  of  Cardine  has  a  charter  of  Blackhills,  and  many  other 
kirk  lands  in  Perthshire,  1588.  Ibid. 

Alexander  Bannerman  of  Waterton,  and  Margaret  Reid  his  spouse,  have  a  char- 
ter dated  29th  April  1590.     Ibid. 

Alexander  Bannerman  of  Waterton  is  Sheriff-Depute  of  Aberdeen,  1509. 
Scotstarvet's  Collections,  page,  184. 

Henry  Bannerman  of  Waterton;  there  is  an  apprising  led  against  him,  at  the 
instance  of  David,  Bishop  of  St  Andrews,  of  his  lands  of  Bryanton,  Rynd,  and  half 
of  Pinsfield,  in  Forfarshire,  for  the  non-entry  duties,  25th  February  1539.  Ibid. 
page  603. 

Andrew  Bannerman  gives  a  charter  to  Henry  Mercer  of  Ledinot,  of  the  six- 
merk  land  of  Easter-Cardeny,  and  nineteen  shilling  seven-penny  land  of  Wester- 
Cardeny,  lying  in  the  barony  of  Logic  and  sheriffdom  of  Perth,  9th  July  1541. 
Ibid,  page  730. 

Alexander  Bannerman  of  Waterton,  and  Margaret  Reid  his  spouse,  have  a  char- 
ter of  the  two-merk  land  of  Auchmurky  (potius  Annidoy  in  Aberdeenshire,  on  his 
own  resignation,  25th  March  1550.     Page  947. 

Margaret  Bannerman,  daughter  of  Elsick,  is  spouse  to  George  Gordon  of 
Haddo,  23d  November  1608,  and  was  great-grandmother  to  the  present  Earl  of 
Aberdeen;  she  has  then  a  charter  in  publica  custodia. 

Bannerman  of  Elsick  married  a  daughter  of  Alexander  Hamilton  of 

Binny,  by  a  daughter  of  the  Earl  of  Abercorn,  whereby  the  family  is  descended 
of  the  blood  royal.     Genealogy  of  Sir  George  Hamilton  of  Tulhallan,  baronet. 

Mr  George  Bannerman  of  Dunboig  was  a  second  son  of  Elsick,  a  bright  man ; 
he  was  admitted  an  Advocate  before  the  Lords  of  Session  14th  February  1671.  He 
was  made  Solicitor  to  King  Charles  !!.[;  to  which  post  he  was  admitted  i6th  of  Ja- 
nuary 1684.  He  married  Elizabeth  Oliphant,  daughter  to  tlie  Laird  of  Bachilton, 
but  died,  (^to  the  regret  of  all  honest  men)  and  was  buried  in  the  Grayfriars  of 
Edinburgh,  the  20th  November  1691.  He  never  qualified  himself  to  the  Prince 
of  Orange,  being  a  staunch  royalist,  as  all  the  family  have  been  for  many  years 
past,  which  atones  for  the  cowardice  of  his  ancestor.  He  had  several  younger 
brethren,  as  Mr  Robert  Bannerman,  minister  at  Newton,  who  was  put  out  of  his 
church   in    1689,    for  not  complying  with  the  iniquity  of  the  times.      Captain 

Bannerman   was   an  officer  in  King  James's  forces,  &-c.     He  had  also 

several  sisters,  one  whereof  was  married  to  Leslie  of  Findrassie,  who  should  have 
been  Earl  of  Rothes,  if  his  great-grandfather,  Norman  Leslie,  fiar  of  Rothes,  son  of 
the  Earl  of  Rothes,  had  not  been  forfeit  for  the  murder  of  Cardinal  Beaton,  where- 
through the  earldom  of  Rothes  fell  to  the  bairns  of  Nicolas  Somerville,  the  first 
lady  of  the  said  earl,  albeit  the  same  was  provided  by  the  father  to  his  second  lady, 
Margaret  Crichton,  daughter  of  William  Lord  Crichton,  begot  on  Cicely,  lawful 
daughter  to  King  James  IL 

There  was  another  sister  of  the  said  Mr  George  married  to  Mr  George  Keith  of 
Whiterigs,  sheriff-depute  of  the  Merns. 


APPENDIX.  145 

Sir  Peter  Bankerman,  a  son  of  this  family,  was  Provost  of  Aberdeen  in  the 
year  17 15. 

The  present  laird  married  a  daughter  of  Sir  Donald  M'Donald  of  Slate,  whereby 
the  family  is  come  a  second  time  of  the  royal  family.  See  the  armorial  bearing  ot 
the  family  in  Volume  First. 


RENTON. 


SIR  THOMAS  RENTON,  M.  D.  second  son  of  William  Renton  of  Mosscastle, 
of  the  House  of  Billy,  by  his  ingenuity  and  great  success  in  curing  of  ruptures 
was  called  to  London  1719.  After  giving  many  ocular  demonstrations  of  his  great 
cures  of  ruptures,  he  was,  by  the  government,  retained  in  Chelsea  College  as  a 
ph\  sician  there  for  the  benefit  of  that  hospital. 

King  George  I.  for  his  faithful  service  and  good  offices  done,  conferred  on  him 
the  honour  of  knighthood,  and  made  him  his  own  physician  extraordinary,  gave 
him  L.  5000  in  specie,  with  h.e^oo  per  annum  during  life.  His  Majesty  yet  fur- 
ther, out  of  his  great  goodness  and  unparalleled  favour,  ordered  my  Lord  Carteret, 
then  Secretary  of  State,  to  cause  (at  his  office)  a  patent  to  be  drawn,  to  create  the 
said  Sir  Thomas  a  Baron  of  Great  Britain,  and  Lord  Renton,  who  modestly  desired 
to  be  excused ;  this,  amongst  many  other  tokens  of  respect  shown  him,  both  at 
home  and  abroad,  when  he  had  the  honour  to  attend  his  majesty  in  his  foreign  do- 
minions. 

Carries,  as  his  arms,  azure,  a  lion  rampant  argent,  on  a  chief  gules  three  stars; 
crest,  a  demi-lion  rampant  argent,  holding  in  his  dexter  paw  a  scimitar  or  sabre: 
motto,  Honor  i$  honestas. 


ROBERTON  of  that  Ilk,  and  of  Earnock,  in  the  Shire  of  L.anark. 


THE  family  and  surname  of  Roberton,  like  most  others  of  the  greatest  anti- 
quity, is  plainly  local,  and  taken  from  their  own  hereditary  lands  of  Roberton, 
when  surnames,  or  agnomina,  began  first  to  be  taken  up  and  assumed  by  persons 
for  distinction's  sake;  which  most  antiquaries  are  agreed  were  not  in  use  in  England 
before  the  conquest  by  the  victorious  Duke  of  Normandy,  or  with  us  before  the 
reign  of  King  Malcolm  II.  commonly  called  Canmore. 

The  first  using  the  surname  of  Roberton,  that  is  to  be  met  with  in  any  authen- 
tic deeds  that  have  occurred  to  me,  is  Rohertus  de  Roberton,  or  Robertas  de  "villa 
Roberti,  which  is  one  and  the  same,  who,  in  or  about  the  1200,  is  witness  to  a 
mortification  by  Hugo  de  Bigris  vicecomes  de  Lanerk,  filius  Roberti  de  Bigris,  filii 
Vaidevi  de  Bigris,  Patronus  trclesia-  de  Stratbeven,  whereby  he  gave  in  pure  and 
perpetual  alms,  Deo  y  aclesia  sancti  Mncenti  de  Lesmahagow,  totam  decimarum 
Bhuli  terra  Ricardi  Barde;  the  other  witnesses  to  the  charter  are  Reginaldus  de 
Cranjufurd,  llcecomes  de  Air,  and  Archibnldiis  de  Douglas.  By  the  witnesses  we 
come  to  know  the  date  of  the  charter,  for,  from  the  same  authority,  the  registers  of 
the  abbacy  of  Kelso,  in  the  Lawyers'  Library,  Sir  Reginald  Crawfurd  executed  the 
office  of  sherift' of  Ayr  precisely  in  the  1228.  The  next  of  the  surname  and  line 
of  the  family  of  Roberton  is  another  Robertas  de  villa  Roberti,  that  is  Roberton  or 
Robertston ;  for  the  word  villa,  in  ancient  times,  was  given  for  a  town,  as  well  as 
smaller  village,  to  which  it  has  been  in  latter  times  restricted;  for  upon  our  old 
coins  we  see  that  on  one  side  they  bear  lllla  de  Edinburge,  Villa  de  Dundee,  Villa 
de  Aberdeen,  &.c.  denominating  the  different  towns  and  places  where  they  were 

Vol.  II.  5  X 


1^6  APPENDIX. 

struck  and  coined  :  So  that  this  Robertus  de  villa  Roherton  is  just  the  same  as  Ro- 
bert of  Robertston,  or  Roberton  of  that  Ilk.  He  under  that  title  and  designation 
is  witness  to  a  charter  granted  by  Thomas  fil'nis  Tankardi,  de  una  Carracntii  terra, 
a  plougli-gate  of  land  in  libcro  maritagio  Johanni  Logan  cum  Beatrice'  sorore  sua, 
as  is  instructed  by  the  original  charter  in  tlie  custody  of  IMajor  John  Roberton  of 
Earnock.  The  deed  has  no  date,  but  another  witness  to  it  is  IVilhelmus  de  Douglas, 
iS  Arkinhahio  filio  suo;  which,  by  the  ancient  writs  of  the  family  of  Douglas, 
appears  to  be  about  the  beginning  of  the  reign  of  Alexander  III.  anno  1250. 

The  next  of  the  line  of  this  ancient  family  was  Stephen  de  Roberton,  who,  upon 
the  demise  of  Margaret  Qiieen  of  Scotland,  commonly  called  the  Maid  of  Norway, 
the  grandchild  and  heir  of  Alexander  111.  when  the  competition  for  the  crown  be- 
gan betwixt  the  Bruce  and  the  Baliol,  this  Stephen  de  Roberton  of  that  Ilk  seems  to 
have  been  attached  to  the  side  of  Baliol  :  In  the  1296,  he,  among  the  other  barons 
and  freeholders  of  the  county  of  Lanark,  swears  fealty  and  allegiance  to  King 
Kdward  I.  of  England,  as  direct  and  immediate  superior  of  the  kingdom  of  Scot- 
land, as  he  then  called  himself,  as  is  instructed  from  the  Ragman  Roll,  in  Prynne's 
History  of  King  John  of  England,  which  he  calls  his  Papal  Usurpations.  The  un- 
controvcrted  tradition  in  the  family,  and  believed  all  the  country  over,  is,  that  in 
the  unhappy  contest  about  the  crown,  that  Stephen  de  Roberton  of  that  Ilk  adhered 
to  the  Baliol,  as  many  others  of  note  did  ;  and  that  upon  the  accession  of  Robert 
rlie  Bruce  to  the  throne  he  was  forfaulted,  the  barony  of  Roberton  was  given  to 
Sir  James  Douglas  of  Larden,  ancestor  to  the  Douglasses  of  Dalkeith  and  Earls  of 
Morton,  and  the  lands  of  Earnock,  in  the  barony  of  Cadyow,  which  till  then  were 
the  patrimony  of  the  crown,  was  given  to  Sir  ^\^alter,  the  son  of  Sir  Gilbert  de 
Hamilton,  the  ancestor  of  his  Grace  the  Duke  of  Hamilton:  In  support  of  this 
traditional  account,  so  much  is  certain,  that  the  barony  of  Roberton  soon  after  that 
time,  and  for  long  tliereafter,  was  in  the  family  of  Dalkeith;  and  PVilliam  de 
Douglas,  son  and  heir  apparent  of  Sir  James  de  Douglas  of  Dalkeith,  is  designed 
Domimis  de  Roberton  in  a  deed  in  the  Fndera  Anglice  about  the  1404.  And  that 
the  family  of  Hamilton  came  to  be  superiors  of  the  lands  of  Earnock,  is  as  plain 
as  writs  granted  by  a  superior  to  his  vassal  can  make  it,  of  vi'hich  the  family  of 
Earnock  have  a  succession  of  charters  from  the  illustrious  family  of  Hamilton. 

But  though  Stephen  Roberton  of  that  Ilk  lost  his  estate  for  adhering  to  a  so- 
vereign he  thought  had  the  best  title,  and  most  agreeable  to  a  hereditary  monarchy, 
yet  his  family  were  not  quite  cut  off,  and  utterly  extinguished ;  for  Simon  Ro- 
berton, his  own  son,  by  the  favour  of  Sir  David  Hamilton  of  Cadyow,  got  back  the 
lands  of  Earnock,  by  the  marriage  of  his  daughter,  and  by  whom  he  had  two  sons, 
John,  and  Robert  a  younger  brother,  who  is  substitute  in  the  succession,  failing 
heirs-male  of  his  brother,  in  the  destination  of  the  estate  of  Earnock,  as  appears 
from  an  original  charter  in  Earnock's  own  possession.  This  John  Roberton  is  the 
first  of  the  family  that  is  designed  of  Earnock;  for  he  gives  Johanni  Ross  de  Hauk- 
head  the  lands  of  Auchinback.  quo  fuere  Jjhannis  Roberton  of  Earnock,./;;  baronio 
de  Renfrew  ;  v^hich  charter  of  alienation  is  ratified  and  confirmed  by  King  Ro- 
bert II.  by  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal,  still  extant  in  the  public  register  of 
charters  at  Edinburgh,  in  the  year  1380.  That  which  still  more  confirms  that 
this  John  Roberton  of  Earnock  had  a  near  alliance  and  relation  by  blood  to  the 
family  of  Hamilton,  is  a  charter  still  extant  in  the  possession  of  the  family  of 
Earnock,  granted  by  "  Johannes  de  Hamilton,  Dominus  de  Cadzow  diiecto  con- 
'■  sanguineo  suo  Johanni  de  Roberton  filio  et  hercdi  quondam  Symonis  de  Ro- 
"  berton,  de  terris  meis  de  Earnock,  Sansay,  prout  jacent  in  baronia  de  Cadzow 
"  in  valle  de  Clydsdale,  una  cum  terra  ilia  que  vocatur  le  Woolshaw,  cum  suis  per- 
"  tinentiis;  tenend.  et  habend.  eidem  Johanni  de  Roberton,  et  heredibus  suis  mas- 
"  culis  de  legittimo  thoro  procreandis,  quibus  deficientibus  Roberto  de  Roberton, 
"  fratri  ejusdem  Johannis  de  Roberton."  To  the  deed  the  granter.  Sir  John  Ha- 
milton of  Cadyovf,  appends  his  seal,  "  Coram  his  testibus,  Robertus  de  Dangleton, 
"  Johannes  de  Hamilton  de  Fingleton,  Alexander  Hamilton,  Johannis  de  Hamilton 
"  de  le  Ross,  Alexander  de  Hamilton  militibus,  Willielmus  ile  Hamilton,  Rotaldo 
"  Wyeir,  Simon  de  Nisbeth,  David  de  Hamilton,  Johannes  de  Allanson  scutiferis." 
The  charter  has  no  precise  date,  but  I  am  pretty  confident  that,  from  other  con- 
curring writs  I  have  perused,  it  is  in  the  1390,  or  1391.     This  John  Roberton  of 


APPENDIX.. 


147 


Earnock  allied  in  man-iage  with  the  family  of  Somerville,  and  had  a  son,  John, 
who  was  his  heir  and  successor,  and  a  daughter,  Isabel,  who  was  married  to  Sir 
Walter  Scott  of  Murdieston,  the  direct  and  immediate  ancestor  of  the  present  Duke 
of  Buccleugh,  as  is  vouched  from  the  original  contract  of  marriage  in  the  charter- 
chest  of  the  House  of  Cleland. 

Which  John  Roberton  of  Earnock  succeeded  his  father,  and  married    Margaret 

Hamilton  daughter  of Hamilton  of (c/),  by  wliom  he  had 

issue  a  son,  John,  who  was  his  father's  heir  apparent,  but  died  in  the  lifetime  of  hi^ 
father  :  However,  he  left  a  son,  Robert,  who  was  served  and  retoured  heir  lo 
John  Roberton  of  Earnock.  his  grandfather,  dated  the  17th  of  February  i486  {b). 
This  Robert  Roberton  of  Earnock  married  Margaret,  daughter  of  John  Hamilton 
of  Torrence  (t),  by  whom  he  had  John  his  son  and  heir,  who  succeeded  his  father, 
and  married  EHzabeth,  daughter  of  Alexander  Cleland  of  that  Ilk,  an  ancient 
family  in  the  shire  of  Lanark,  whose  mother  was  daughter  to  the  Lord  Somerville, 
and  had  issue  :  He  married  next  Margaret,  daughter  of  Allan  Lord  Cathcart,  by 
Helen  his  wife,  daughter  of  William  Lord  Semple,  and  had  a  numerous  posterity, 
viz.  John  his  eldest  son,  who  was  the  heir  of  the  family,  Robert  Roberton,  a 
younger  son,  who  went  abroad  and  settled  in  France. 

John  Roberton  of  Earnock,  the  next  in  succession  of  this  ancient  family,  mar- 
ried Margaret  Hamilton,  daughter  of  James  Hamilton  of  Torrence,  descended  of 
Thomas  Hamilton,  a  brother  of  the  family  of  Hamilton,  in  the  reign  of  King 
James  I.  by  whom  he  had  James  his  heir  and  successor  (i^/),  who  succeeded  him 
hi  his  estate,  John  Roberton  Esq.  the  ancestor  of  the  present  House  of  Earnock, 
Archibald,  the  third  brother,  of  Stainhall  :  He  married  EHzabeth  daughter  of  Ro- 
bert Baillie  of  Jervieston,  by  whom  he  had  Mr  James  Roberton  of  Eedlay,  who 
was  one  of  the  Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice  at  the  Restoration  of  King 
Charles  II.  great-grandfather  to  James  Roberton  now  of  Bedlay,  and  several 
daughters,  one  of  whom  was  married  to  the  famous  Mr  David  Dickson,  of  whom 
is  lineally  descended  the  present  Sir  Robert  Dickson  of  Carberry,  baronet,  and 
another  to  Mr  John  Rae,  a  Professor  in  the  University  of  Glasgow,  and  had  issue  ; 
of  whom  are  descended  by  the  mother  side  the  Hamiltons  of  Bardowie,  and  the 
late  Hamiltons  of  Dalserf.  This  John  Roberton  of  Earnock  had  also  several 
daughters ;  Abigail,  who  was  married  to  Mr  David  Forsyth  of  Halhill  and 
Dykes,  Commissary  of  Glasgow,  of  whom  a  numerous  issue  are  descended  ;  Mar- 
garet, another  daughter,  was  married  to  Robert  Hamilton  of  Little-Earnock,  or 
Kennedy 's-Earnock ;  and  her  second  son  was  James  Hamilton  of  Bangour,  of 
whom  that  family  is  descended  ;  and  his  second  son  was  Sir  William  Hamilton  of 
Whitelaw,  one  of  the  Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice,  and  Juitice-Clerk  in  the 
1704. 

James  Roberton,  the  next  ot  the  House  of  Earnock  in  succession,  married 
Christian  Dundas,  daughter  to  John  Dundas  of  Newliston,  whose  mother  was  a 
daughter  of  the  famdy  of  the  Stewarts  of  Rosyth  :  She  was  a  widow  to  Robert 
Dalziel  of  that  Ilk  ;  by  her  he  had  James,  who  succeeded,  and  a  daughter,  who 
was  married  to  Robert  Hamilton  of  Airdrie,  and  had  issue  ;  another  to  Blair  of 
Braxfield,  another  to  Muirhead  of  Lynbank,  and  had  issue;  another  to  Mr 
Muirhead,  a  brother  of  Lynbank,  of  whom  was  lineally  descended  Mr  John. 
Muirhead,  minister  at  Cambusnethan,  and  William  Muirhead,  Esq.  his  bro- 
ther. 

James  Roberton  of  Earnock  succeeded  his  fether,  and  married  Alison,  daughter 
of  Robert  Hamilton  of  Preston,  by  whom  he  had  a  numerous  issue  of  sons,  John, 
Matthew,  James,  George,  Andrew  ;  several  of  these  gentlemen,  the  younger  sons 
of  the  family  of  Earnock,  went  abroad,  and  served  under  the  Duke  of  Hamilton, 
in  his  expedition  to  Germany  in  the  163 1,  in  the  service  of  the  renowned  Gusta- 
vus  Adolphus  King  of  Sweden,  against  the  Imperialists  ;  particularly  Matthew. 
Roberton,  the  second  brother,  inclining  to  settle  abroad,  he  obtained  from  the 
Marquis  of  Hamilton  a  certificate  of  his  birth  and  family  ;  which  the  Marquis  ac^ 
cordingly  caused  draw  up  in   form   of  a  birth-brief,  certifying  the  said  Matthew'. 

{a)  Writs  in  the  cliarter-chest  of  tlie  family  of  Earnock,  nl.ich  I  have  seen  and  perused;  (p)  Ibirl-, 
Cr)  The  writs  of  the  family  vouch  all  this  succession.      (</)  ft/,/. 

3 


14S 


APPENDIX. 


Roberton  to  be  younger  son  to  James  Roberton  of  Earnock  ;  John  Roberton,  by 
corruption  called  Robton  in  France,  was  his  grandson,  and  was  a  Counsellor  of 
the  Parliament  of  Paris :  The  Counsellor  left  behind  him  a  son,  John  Robton 
or  Robei-con,  who  died  in  1721,  and  was  Secretary  to  his  Majesty  King  George  I. 
as  Elector  of  Hanover,  and  left  a  son,  George  Robton,  Esq.  his  son  and 
heir. 

From  James  Roberton  of  Earnock  the  estate  of  Earnock  came  to  the  heirs  of 
his  second  brother  John  Roberton.  This  John  Roberton  got  an  annuity  out  of 
ihe  lands  of  Allheirstocks,  from  William  Bannatyne  of  Corhouse  :  In  the  deed  he 
is  designed  John  Roberton,  brother-german  to  James  Roberton  of  Earnock  ;  it  is 
taken  to  himself  in  liferent,  and  to  Bartholomew  Roberton,  his  eldest  son,  in  fee, 
and  to  his  heirs  ;  which  failing,  to  John  Roberton  his  second  son  :  it  is  dated  in 
the  year  1586  (a)  :  This  John  Roberton,  the  ancestor  of  Earnock,  married  Chris- 
tian, daughter  of  Robert  Dalziel  of  that  Ilk,  ancestor  to  the  Earl  of  Garnwath  (b), 
by  whom  he  had  John  his  eldest  son,  who  died  without  succession,  and  Bartholo- 
mew,  his  father's  heir  and  successor  in  the  estate  of  Earnock.  For  vouching  and 
instructing  this  descent,  there  is  a  precept  of  dare  constat,  by  Robert  Lord  Semple, 
to  James  Roberton  of  Earnock,  of  the  lands  of  Shawton  in  the  barony  of  Glass, 
ford,  and  to  the  heirs-male  lawfully  procreate  of  his  body  ;  which  failing,  to 
"  John  Roberton  iilio  et  hxredi  apparenti  Johannis  Roberton  fratris-germani  dicti 
"  jacobi  Roberton  de  Earnock,  procreatum  inter  quondam  Catherinam  Dalziel 
"  sorovem  uterinani  dicti  Jacobi  Roberton  de  Earnock,  et  haeredibus  suis,  quibus 
"  deficientibus  Bartholomeo  Roberton  fratri  suo  germano,  et  ha;redibus  suis,  qui- 
'•  bus  deficientibus  hicredibus  dicti  Johannis  Roberton  patris,  quibus  deficientibus 
"  Archibaldo  Roberton  in  Stainhill  fratris-germani  dicti  Jacobi  et  Johannis,  et 
"  hxredibus  suis."  This  deed  bears  date  the  8th  of  September  1598  (c)  .•  This 
John  Roberton,  after  the  death  of  Katharine  Dalziel  his  first  wife,  married  again 
Margaret  Hamilton,  daughter  of  John  Hamilton  of  Orbieston,  and  sister-german 
to  John  Hamilton  then  of  Orbieston,  who  is  the  party  contracting  for  her  in  the 
ii;q^,  as  appears  from  the  original  contract  in  the  Laird  of  Earnock's  charter-chest, 
wVich  I  have  seen.  This  John  had  by  Katharine  Dalziel,  his  first  wife  aforesaid, 
Bartholomew  his  heir,  and  the  next  Laird  of  Earnock,  and  John,  who  was  Sheriflf- 
Clerk  of  Lanark,  of  whom  the  Robertons  of  Whisleberry,  and  others,  are  de- 
scended. The  above  Joan  likewise  had  a  brother  named  Mr  James,  who  pre- 
ceded the  last  mentioned  John  as  Sheriff-Clerk  of  Lanark,  and  who  mortified  a 
considerable  sum  of  money  for  erecting  an  hospital  at  Hamilton,  which  subsists  to 
this  day ;  as  the  original  in  the  hands  of  the  Town-Council  of  Hamilton  more 
fully  bears. 

Which  Bartholomew  Roberton  then  his  father's  son  and  heir  apparent,  on  the 
17th  of  October  1608,  is,  with  consent  of  his  father,  contracted  to  Margaret  Law, 
lawful  daughter  of  John  Law  of  Waterfoot  in  Merns :  She  was  sister  to  Mr  An- 
drew Law,  minister  at  Neilston,  grandfather  to  John  Law,  Esq.  the  great  Mr  Law, 
who  was  General  Governor  of  the  Fmances  of  France  in  the  minority  of  Lewis  XV. 
during  the  regency  of  the  late  Duke  of  Orleans,  who  made  such  an  illustrious 
iigure  in  Europe  at  that  time  :  By  her,  the  said  Margaret  Law  his  wife,  he  had 
issue 

John  Roberton  of  Earnock,  his  son  and  successor  in  his  estate,  who  married 
Christian,  daughter  of  Sir  John  Hamilton  of  Orbieston,  who  was  one  of  the  Sena- 
tors of  the  College  of  Justice,  an*  Lord  Justice-Clerk,  in  the  reign  of  King 
Charles  L  by  Bethia,  his  first  wife,  daughter  of  James  Bonar  of  Rossie,  an  an- 
cient family  in  the  shire  of  Fife,  but  is  now  extinct :  by  whom  he  had  a  son,  who 
was  his  successor,  and  a  daughter,  Anna,  who  was  married  to  James  Chancellor, 
son  and  heir  of  Robert  Chancellor  of  Shieldhill,  in  the  county  of  Lanark,  and  had 
issue. 

Which  John  Roberton  of  Earnock  married  Bethia,  daughter  of  Sir  John  Hen- 
derson of  Fordel,  the  first  baronet  of  that  ancient  family.  Her  mother  was  Mar- 
garet Monteith,  daughter  of  William  Monteith  of  Randeford  in  the  county  of 

(a)  The  original  Is  in  the  hands  of  the  present  Earnock.  (i)  Writs  in  the  charter-chest  of  the 
House  of  Earnocli,  which  I  have  seen.  (<r)  Charter  in  the  custody  of  Major  Roberton  of  Ear- 
nock. 


APPENDIX.  749 

Fife,  andof  Margaret  Colvil  his  wife,  daughter  of  Robert  Colvil  of  Clyth,  ancestor 
to  the  Lord  Colvil  of  Ochiltree,  by  whom  he  had  issue,  John,  his  son  and  heir,  and 
one  daughter.  Christian,  who  was  married  to  Archibald  Roberton  of  Bedlay,  and 
had  issue. 

John  Roberton,  the  next  of  the  family  of  Earnock,  married  Anne,  daughter  of 
William  Hamilton  of  Raploch,  descended  of  Thomas  Hamilton  of  Darngaber,  an 
immediate  brother  of  the  illustrious  house  of  Hamilton,  in  the  reign  of  King 
Robert  III.  Her  mother  was  Jean,  daughter  of  Sir  John  Kennedy  of  Colzean, 
by  his  first  wife  Margaret,  daughter  of  Bryce  Blair  of  that  Ilk,  an  ancient  family 
in  Ayrshire,  from  whom  is  paternally  sprung  the  Earls  of  Dundonald :  By  her  he 
had  John,  his  eldest  sonand  heir,  and  William,  a  younger  brother,  a  fine  young 
gentleman  of  great  merit  and  virtue,  who  died  unmarried,  to  the  grief  and  regret 
of  every  one  who  knew  him. 

Major  John  Roberton,  now  of  Earnock,  married  Elizabeth,  eldest  daughter  of 
James  Hamilton  of  Daliiel,  by  Margaret  his  wife,  daughter  of  Sir  Archibald  Ha- 
milton of  Rosehall,  baronet,  and  has  issue,  James  Roberton,  Esq.  his  son  and  ap- 
parent heir. 

The  armorial  bearing  of  this  ancient  family  is,  quarterly,  first  and  fourth  gules, 
a  close  helmet  argent,  second  and  ihxtA.  argent,  a  cross  croslet  Jitche  gules;  crest, 
n.n  anchor  proper  :  motto.  For  security. 


Memorial  anent  the  descent  and  succession  of  the  STEWARTS  of  Lorm 

AND  Gp.andtully. 


IT  is^  plain  and  evident,  from  charters  and  other  authentic  documents,  that  the 
Stewarts  of  Lorn  and  their  descendants  are  originally  descended  from  James  Stew- 
art, son  of  Sir  John  Stewart  of  Bonkill,  who  was  slain  in  the  service  of  his  country, 
at  the  battle  of  Falkirk,  against  the  English,  in  the  1299:  He  was  son  of  Alexan- 
der Great  Steward  of  Scotland,  and  hrothcT,frater-germanus,  as  he  is  designed  both 
in  Rymer's  Fadera  and  Prynne's  Collections,  Jacobi  Senescalli  Scotia,  who  was  one 
of  the  Lords  of  the  regency  of  Scotland  after  the  death  of  the  young  queen,  com- 
monly called  the  Maid  of  Norway,  the  grandchild  and  heir  of  King  Alexander  III. 
anjto  1 29 1. 

This  James,  Senescalli  filius  quondam  DoTO-iui  Joannis  Senescalli  militis,  as  he  is 
designed,  had  a  grant  from.  King  Robert  I.  as  the  reward  of  his  merit  and  services, 
of  the  lands  of  Pierston  and  Warvvickhill,  in  baronin  de  Cunningham  13  vicecomi- 
tatu  de  Air,  as  the  charter  in  the  registers  bear  :  He  was  slain,  with  two  of  his 
brothers,  Sir  Allan  and  John,  at  the  fatal  battle  of  Duplin  in  the  1332,  as  is 
vouched  from  Fordun,  and  the  histories.  He  left  clearly  from  authentic  proofs 
three  sons ;  Sir  John,  the  eldest,  became  his  father's  lieir  in  the  lands  of  Pierston, 
and  from  whence  he  took  his  designation  of  Dominus  de  Pierston.  He  is,  under 
that  stile  and  title,  witness  to  a  charter  of  mortification,  by  Joannis  Maxwell  domi- 
nus ejusdem,  of  the  patronage  of  the  church  of  Libberton  to  the  monastery  of 
Kilwinning,  which  is  ratified  and  confirmed  by  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal  of 
King  David,  in  the  1370,  still  preserved  in  the  public  archives.  He  had  the 
honour  of  knighthood  conferred  on  him  by  King  Robert  II.  after  his  accession  to 
the  crown,  and  had  moreover  a  grant  from  that  prince  of  the  lands  and  barony  of 
Kelly  in  Forfarshire  :  In  the  grant  he  is  designed  by  the  lang,  Dilectus  consangui- 
neus  noster  Joannis  Senescalli,  miles,  filius  quondam  domini  Jacobi  Senescalli  («), 
This  Sir  John  Stewart  of  Pierston  and  Kelly  had  no  issue-male  but  only  a  daugh- 

(a)  Mr  Simpson  the  Historiogtapher,  in  his  Collections  from  the  Registers. 

YoL.  U  5  Y 


150  APPENDIX. 

ter,  who  was  married  to  Sir  Williara  Douglas,  who  thereupon  designs  himself 
DomiiiiLf  lie  Pierston,  as  we  find  him  in  a  charter  to  Reginaldus  de  Fidlarton  Daminus 
de  Crosby,  in  the  1394  {b),  which  I  have  seen  ;  and  in  another  charter  of  mortifi- 
cation by  Mar^areta  Senescalli  domina  de  Cragy,  to  the  convent  of  the  Black- 
friars  of  Ayr  in  the  1399,  he  is  designed  Willielmus  de  Douglas  Dorninus  de  Pier- 
ston miles  (c).  He  left  two  daughters  his  co-heirs ;  Agnes  who  was  married  to 
John  Blair  of  Adamton,  and  the  other  to  Archibald  Cravvfurd  of  Thridpart,  who 
make  over  their  respective  shares  of  the  barony  of  Kelly  to  WiUiam  Ochterlony, 
in  the  year  1445  ;  as  from  the  charter  belonging  to  the  family  of  Panmure,  which 
I  have  seen. 

Sir  James  Stewart  of  Pierston  had  a  second  sm.  Sir  Robert  Stewart,  and  a 
third  son,  who  was  designed  Sir  Allan  Stewart  of  Ugletree  :  He  calls  himself ^/»m 
quondam  domini  Jacohi  Senescalli,  when  he  gives,  by  his  charter.  Sir  Henry  Dou- 
glas of  Lochleven  the  lands  and  barony  of  Lugton,  anno  1377  (a?).  In  the  deed 
Robert  Stewart  of  Innermeth,  knight,  frater  suus  germanus,  is  a  witness,  and 
proves  clearly  that  Sir  James  Stewart,  son  of  the  deceased  Sir  John  Stewart,  who- 
got  Pierston  from  King  Robert  I.  had  three  sons,  Sir  John  Stewart  of  Pierston, 
whose  issue-male  failed,  as  is  observed,  Sir  Robert  Stewart  of  Innermeth,  whom 
Sir  Allan  Stewart,  the  third  son,  calls  his  brother-german,  and  himself  ^/f«j  quon- 
d^im  Domini  Jacobi  Senescalli,  militis,  in  the  charter  'he  gives  to  Sir  Henry  Douglas 
of  Lochleven  :  His  issue-male  also  failed.  The  seal  of  this  Sir  Allan  Stewart  I 
have  myself;  it  is  the  fesse  cheque,  surmounted  of  a  bend  ingrailed,  and  charged 
with  three  buckles. 

Sir  Robert  Stewart,  the  other  son  of  Sir  James  of  Pierston,  and  brother  to  Sir 
John  of  Pierston  and  Sir  Allan  of  Ugletree,  carried  down  the  line  of  the  family  : 
The  first  time  I  find  him  mentioned  in  any  authentic  deed  that  has  come  to  my 
hands,  is  in  a  charter  granted  by  "  Thomas  de  Moravia  Dominus  de  Bothwell 
"  Panitarius  ScotiiB  Roberto  Senescallo,  de  omnibus  terris  de  Shandbothy  in  bar- 
"  onia  de  Bothuel,  ac  vicecomitatu  de  Clackmannan"  {e).  Under  this  title  and 
designation  King  David  II.  gave  "  Roberto  Senescallo  de  Shandbothy  terris  de 
"  Dalziel  et  de  Modervile,  cum  pcrtinentiis,  in  vicecomitatu  de  Lanark,  nos  con- 
*<  tingen.  pro  eo  quod  haeredis  quondam  Roberti  Delvall,  militis,  contra  fidem  et 
"  pacem  nostram  in  Anglia  commorantar,  tenend.  et  habend.  dictis  terris  in  li- 
"  beram  baroniam  adeo  libere  sicut  quondam  Malcolmus  Fleming,  et  praedictus 
"  Robertus  de  Lavall,  tenuerunt.  Apud  Edinburgh,  20.  March,  anno  regni  nos- 
"  tri  33."  which  is  the  year  1362  (/). 

The  same  Robert  de  Senescalli  de  Shandbothy  gets  a  charter  under  the  Great 
Seal  of  King  David  II.  of  the  half  of  the  lands  of  Redcastle  in  the  shire  of  Forfar, 
on  the  resignation  of  Sir  Andrew  Campbell  of  Loudon,  dated  the  8th  of  March 
J  368  {g),  and  which  lands  continued  in  the  family  of  Innermeth  so  long  as  they 
.subsisted.  The  same  Robert  Stewart  of  Shandbothy  had  the  honour  of  knight- 
hood conferred  on  him  by  King  Robert  II.;  and  having  by  this  time  acquired  the 
knds  and  barony  of  Innermeth,  he  came  from  thence  to  assume  his  designation. 
Under  that  title  he  gets  a'  charter  of  the  lands  of  Durisdeer  in  Dumfries-shire, 
from  King  Robert  II.  on  the  resignation  of  Alexander  Menzies  of  Redhall ;  and 
the  same  Sir  Robert  Stewart  of  Innermeth  is  one  of  the  Proceres  and  Magnates 
regni  Scotice,  who  in  a  Parliamentary  capacity  recognize  the  right  of  apparency  of 
John  Earl  of  Carrick  to  the  crown,  as  the  eldest  lawful  son  and  heir  apparent  of 
tlie  king  his  father,  the  4th  of  April  1373  {h).  This  Sir  Robert  Stewart  of  Inner- 
meth died  in  the  year  1386;  and,  from  charters  and  other  authentic  vouchers 
left  issue  two  sons  and  a  daughter,  viz.  Sir  John  Stewart  the  eldest,  the  heir  of  the 
family. 

{F)  Penes  W.  Fullarton  de  eodem.  (c)  The  original  charter  of  mortification  I  have  seen,  belonging 
to  the  University  of  Glasgow.  (</)  Mr  David  Simpson's  Historical  Account  of  the  Stewarts. 
{e)  Charter  in  the  writs  of  the  family  of  Rosyth.  (/)  The  original  charter  I  have  seen  and  per- 
used in  the  custody  of  Mr  Hiimilton  of  Dalziel.  (^)  In  the  writs  of  Rosyth  and  the  records  which  I 
have  seen.  {h)  Act  of  Parliament  still  extant  in  the  registers,  and  published  by  the  noble  and 
learned  antiquary  George  Earl  of  Cromarty  in  the  Vindication  of  the    Legitimacy  of  King  Robert 

m. 


APPENDIZi.  151 

Sir  Robert  Stewart  the  second,  who  was  the  ancestor  of  the  Stewarts  of  Duris- 
deer  and  Rosyth  in  the  shire  of  life,  where  they  long  continued  in  lustre,  and 
produced  several  honourable  branches.  The  origin  of  the  House  of  Rosyth  is  in- 
structed from  a  charter  in  the  writs  of  the  family  of  Rosyth ;  more  particularly, 
there  is  a  charter  granted  by  John  Stewart  of  Inncrmeth,  knight,  of  an  an- 
nuity ofL.  20  Sterling,  payable  out  of  the  barony  of  Durisdeer,  Roberto  Senes- 
callo  frntri  suo  gcnni-mo  \  which  deed  is  confirmed  by  a  charter  under  the  Great 
Seal  of  King  Robert  II.  the  20th  of  April,  the  15th  year  of  his  reign,  tliat  is  the 
1386  (/').  The  same  Robert  Stewart  gets  a  charter  of  the  lands  and  barony  of 
Durisdeer,  on  the  resignation  of  Sir  John  Sttwart  of  Innermeth  his  brother-ger- 
man,  dated  the  ist  of  April  1388.  This  Sir  Robert  Stewart  of  Shandbotiiy  and. 
Innermeth  had  also  a  daughter,  Elizabeth,  who  was  married  to  Sir  John  Bethune 
of  Balfour  in  the  shire  of  Fife,  and  of  wliom  all  the  family  of  the  Bethunes  are  de- 
scended {k). 

Sir  John  Stewart  of  Innermeth  was  his  father's  successor,  and  designs  himself 
Dominus  de  Innermeath  in  several  deeds  of  that  time  :  He  married  the  daughter  and 
heir  of  Eugene  de  Ergadia  Dominus  de  Lorn,  the  head  of  the  M'Dougal  family,  and 
thereupon  he  assumed,  quarterly,  the  galley,  the  arms  and  bearing  of  that  house,  into 
his  achievement,  which  was  still  carried  by  his  successor,  and  now  by  Stewart  ot 
Grandtully,  as  the  heir-male  and  representative  of  the  House  of  Lorn  and  Innermeth, 
as  we  shall  more  fully  vouch  in  the  sequel  of  this  memorial:  After  the  marriage  of 
Sir  John  Stewart  of  Innermeth,  with  the  heir-female  of  the  house  of  Lorn,  he  de- 
signs himself  Dominus  Jjrinnis  Senescalii  de  Innermeath,  dominus  de  Lorn,  both  in 
public  national  deeds  and  in  private  documents,  particularly  in  a  charter  granted 
by  IMUienuis  Ruthven  Dominus  ejusdem,  Malcolmo  Ruthvenfratri  suo,  of  the  lands  of 
of  Haslehead  in  the  shire  of  Ayr,  in  141 1,  in  which  he  is  a  witness  (/),  and  in  se- 
veral transactions  with  the  English,  in  which  he  is  acting  either  as  a  plenipotentiary, 
or  a  guarantee,  too  long  to  be  insert  in  a  memorial  of  this  nature,  but  may  be 
seen  at  large  in  Rymer's  Fcedera  ^■inglia,  wherein  this  Joannis  Senescalii  or  Stuart 
de  Innermeath,  et  Dominus  de  Lorn,  is  to  be  met  with  in  the  1407  and  downward  : 
By  his  wife,  the  heiress  of  Lorn  aforesaid,  Sir  John  Stewart  of  Innermeth  had 
issue  several  sons,  viz.  Sir  Robert  Stewart  of  Innerm.eth  and  Lorn,  who  was  invest- 
ed in  the  honour  of  a  Lord  of  Parliament  by  King  James  II.  whose  son,  John 
Lord  Lorn,  dying  without  any  lawful  male  issue  in  the  1469,  his  estate  of  Inner- 
meth went  to  his  brother  and  heir-male,  Walter  Lord  Innermeth,  and  the  estate  of 
Lorn  went  to  his  three  daughters  and  co-heirs ;  Isabel,  who  was  married  to  Colin  the 
first  Earl  of  Argyle;  Margaret  to  Sir  Colin  Campbell  liis  uncle,  who  was  the  first 
Laird  of  Glenorchy,  the  direct  and  immediate  ancestor  of  the  Earl  of  Breadalbane; 
Marion,  the  third  daughter,  was  married  to  Arthur  Campbell  of  Ottar,  uncle  to 
the  Earl  of  Argyle  (w),  who  all  carried  the  galley  in  their  arms,  denoting  their  de- 
scent and  alliance  with  the  House  of  Lorn  :  We  can  only  here  just  stay  to  mention, 
that  the  Stewarts,  the  Lords  of  Innermeth,  were  honoured  with  the  title  of  Earl  of 
Athol  by  King  James  VI.  in  the  1595,  in  the  person  of  John  Lord  Innermeth; 
but  his  son  James  Lord  Innermeth  and  Earl  of  Athol,  dying  without  issue,  the 
honour  was  transferred  to  the  Earl  of  Tullibardin. 

Sir  James  Stewart,  commonly  called  the  Black  Knight  of  Lorn  by  our  histo- 
rians, was  the  second  son  of  Sir  John  Stewart  of  Innermeth  and  Lorn,  who  had 
the  honour  to  marry  Jane  Qiieen  Dowager  of  Scotland,  widow  of  James  I.  and 
daughter  of  John  Duke  of  Somerset  in  England,  to  whom  she  bare  three  sons.  Sir 
John  Stewart  of  Balveny,  whom  King  James  II.  invested  in  the  honour  of  Earl  of 
Athol,  whose  line  ended  in  John  Earl  of  Athol,  who  died  without  issue-male 
in  the  1594  ;  so,  as  we  have  before  observed  in  this  memorial,  that  title  was  con- 
ferred on  another  Stewart  of  the  same  race  and  blood  of  the  Stewarts,  John  Lord 
Innermeth,  whose  son,  as  we  have  said,  James  Earl  of  Athol  died  without  issue; 

(0  This  from  the  writs  of  the  House  of  Rosyth,  in  a  manuscript  of  the  family  done  by  the  learned 
antiquary  Mr  David  Simpson,  late  historiographer  of  Scotland,  in  his  own  hand,  in  my  custody,  and 
the  charter  I  have  seen  in  the  Duke  of  Douglas's  hands,  {i)  Mr  Martin  of  Clermons  Collections. 
(/)  This  charter  the  author  of  this  memorial  has  seen  in  the  custody  of  Laurence  Oliphant  of  Gask. 
(m)  All  this  alliance  is  fully  vouched  both  from  the  v.'rils  in  the  Duke  of  Argjlc's  custody  and  the  public 
registers. 


153 


APPENDIX, 


so  that  the  right  of  blood,  and  the  representing  the  House  ox"  Innermeth  and  Lorn 
must  fall  to  the  next  heir-niale  of  that  noble  family,  who  are  plainly  and  clearly 
the  Stewarts  of  the  House  of  Grandtully ;  whose  ancestor,  from  undeniable  vouchers 
that  are  lying  before  the  author  of  this  memorial  at  the  writing  of  this  paper, 
and  shall  be  condescended  on,  was  Alexander  Stewart,  third  son  of  Sir  John  Stew- 
art of  Innermeth  and  Lorn,  brother  to  Robert  fust  Lord  Lorn,  and  to  Sir  James 
Stewart,  called  the  Black  Knight  of  Lorn,  the  ancestor  of  the  first  race  of  the 
Stewarts  Earls  of  Athol.  This  is  clearly  vouched  from  a  charter  belonging  to  Sir 
George  Stewart  of  Grandtully,  baronet,  and  now  in  my  hands,  granted  by  "  Joan- 
"  nis  de  Haia  dommus  de  TuUibothy,  dilccto  suo  Alexandro  Stuart  filio  nobilis  viri, 
"  Joannis  Stuart,  militis,  Domini  de  Lorn,  de  omnibus  terris  suis  de  Banchory,  cum 
"  suis  pertinentiis,  jacen.  infra  vicecomitatum  de  Clackmanan,  pro  patrimonio 
"  inter  praefatum  Alexandrum  et  Margaretam  sororem  meam,  fideliter  contrahen- 
"  do  et  completando."  The  charter  proceeds  upon  the  resignation  of  Christian 
More  domina  Bruntshiel,  in  her  pure  viduity,  and  bears  date  at  Tillibody  the  15th 
of  July  of  the  year  1416  (n).  This  deed  is  ratified  and  confirmed  by  Robert  Duke 
of  Albany,  Earl  of  Fife  and  Monteith,  Governorof  Scotland  in  the  minority  of  King 
James  I.  He  ratifies  "  donationem  illam  et  concessionem  quam  quondam  con- 
"  sanguineus  noster  Joannis  de  Haia  de  Tillibothy  fecit  et  concessit  Alexandro 
"  Senescalli  (Stewart)  filii  dilecti  consanguine!  nostri  Joannis  Senescalli  de  Lorn 
"  militis."  The  charter  has  the  Duke  Regent's  great  seal,  the  seal  of  his  office, 
appended  to  it,  and  bears  date  at  Falkland  the  19th  of  June  1419  (0).  This 
Alexander  Stewart  of  Banchory,  third  son  to  Sir  John  Stewart  of  Lorn,  the  first  ot 
the  House  of  Grandtully  by  the  aforesaid  Margaret  his  wife,  daughter  of  John 
Hay  of  Tillibody,  and  sister  tft  John  Hay  of  Tillibody  (/>),  had  a  son, 

Thomas  Stewart  of  Banchory  and  Grandtully,  his  heir  and  successor,  who  by 
his  wife,  daughter  of  had  a 

son,  Alexander.  This  Thomas  comes  to  be  designed  of  Grandtully  ;  for  there  is  in 
the  public  registers  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal,  Thomce  Stuart  de  Gairntully,  of  a 
part  of  the  lands  of  Comrie  in  the  year  1452  {q).  This  same  Thomas  Stewart  is  sub- 
stitute in  an  entail  of  the  estate  of  the  Lord  Lorn,  and  is  designed  his  consanguineus  : 
For  vouching  this,  there  is  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal  by  King  James  II.  di- 
lccto consanguineo  suo  Joanni  Domini  Lorn,  of  the  estate  and  lordship  of  Lorn^ 
and  to  the  heirs-male  of  his  body  ;  which  failing,  to  Walter  Stewart  his  brother- 
german,  and  the  heirs-male  of  his  body ;  v/hich  faihng,  to  Allan  Stewart  his  bro- 
ther ;  which  failing,  to  William  Stewart  his  uncle  ;  which  failing.  Domino  Jacobo 
Stuart  militi ;  which  failing,  Tboma  Stuart  comanguinco  suo,  who  is  the  same  Tho- 
mas Stewart  of  Grandtully,  and  to  the  heirs-male  of  their  bodies  respective,  of  the 
whole  estate  and  lordship  of  Lorn,  in  the  1452  aforesaid;  and  that  very  same  year, 
1452,  there  is,  we  say,  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal  in  the  public  records  (?) 
Thoimt  Stuait  de  Gairntully,  of  the  half  of  the  lands  of  Comrie  which  formerly  be- 
longed to  Angus  Menzies,  and  were  resigned  by  him.  This  Thomas  Stewart  of 
Grandtully,  son  and  heir  of  Alexander  Stewart  of  Banchory,  who  was  a  son  of  Sir 
John  Stewart  of  Lorn,  the  second  of  the  line  and  succession  of  the  House  of  Grand- 
tully. By  Agnes,  daughter  of  Sir  William  Murray  of  Tullibardin,  his  wife,  he 
had  a  son, 

Alexander  Stewart  of  Grandtully,  the  third  in  the  line  and  succession  of  the 
family  :  This  is  vouched  and  instructed  from  a  deed  in  the  custody  of  Sir  George 
Stewart  of  Grandtully,  which  I  have  seen,  whereby  Alexander  Stewart  of  Grand- 
tully is  served  and  retoured  heir  in  special  to  the  deceased  Thomas  Stewart  of  Grand- 
tully, his  father,  in  the  lands  of  Banchory,  lying  within  the  sheriffdom  of  Clack- 
manan, and  is  of  the  date  the  14th  of  June  of  the  year  1462  (j).  This  Alex- 
ander Stewart  of  Grandtully  married  Matilda  Stewart,  sister  to  Andrew  Lord.  Evan- 

(«)  Charta  penes  Dcminum  Georgium  Stuart  de  Gairntully,  Baronetum,  marked  No.  i.  in  the  inven- 
tory of  his  writs,  (n)  Charter  in  the  hands  of  Sir  George  Stewart,  I  have  seen  in  the  writing  this  me- 
morial. (/>)  I  have  seen  a  charter  in  the  custody  of  the  Countess  of  Errol,  by  Joannis  de  Haia  de  Til- 
libothy, Joannis  de  Logy  domino  ejusdem,  in  1368,  the  father  of  this  John  de  Haia  in  1419.  (y)  In 
the  registers  of  the  Great  Seal  in  the  Archives,  (r)  Charter  under  the  Great  Seal  in  the  public  archives- 
to  Thomas  Stewart  of  Grandtully.  (r)  Service  as  heir  to  Thomas  Stewart  of  Grandtully  his  father. 
I 


APPENDIX. 


«5.« 


dale  anJ  grandclulJ  to  Muiduch  Duke  of  Albany  by  James  his  son  (t).  There 
is  in  the  custody  ot"  Sir  George  Stewait  of  GrandtuUy,  and  lying  before  me  at  the 
drawuig  up  this  memorial,  a  charter  granted  by  Alexander  Earl  of  Huntly  as  su- 
perior of  the  land'*  of  Tillibody,  "  dilecto  consanguinco  suo  Alexandre  Stuart  de 
"  Gairntully  et  Macildae  Stuart  spons;€  su;c,"  of  the  lands  of  Banchrys  "  in  vice 
"  comitatu  de  Clackmannan  :"  'I'lie  charter  is  dated  at  Badenoch  the  lOth  July, 
^;ino  1469  (;/).     By  the  foresaid  Matilda  his  wife  he  had  a  son,  who  was  his  heir. 


VIZ. 


Thomas  Stewart  of  GrandtuUy,  who  was  served  and  retoured  heir  in  special  to 
the  deceast  Alexander  Stewart  of  GarndtuUy,  his  father,  in  the  lands  of  Banchrys, 
pursuant  to  a  precept  forth  of  the  Chancery,  dated  the  26th  of  January  1488, 
still  extant  in  the  custody  of  Sir  George  Stewart,  baronet,  which  I  have  seen  and 
perused. 

This  Thomas  Stewart  of  GrandtuUy  married  Agnes,  daughter  to  Sir  William 
Murray,  and  sister  to  another  Sir  William  Murray  of  TuUibardin,  ancestor  to  his 
grace  the> present  Duke  of  Athol  (v),  by  whom  he  had  only  one  daughter,  Eli- 
zabeth Stewart,  his  sole  heir :  she  is  designed  EHzabiftha  Stuart  Doinina  de  Gairn- 
tully, when  in  the  1532  she  gives  a  charter,  with  consent  of  Thomas  Stewart  of 
GrandtuUy,  her  husband,  out  of  the  lands  of  Banchory,  to  Alexander  Shaw  of 
Sauchie,  the  original  of  which  I  have  seen  in  the  custody  of  Sir  John  Shaw  of 
Greenock  and  Sauchie,  baronet. 

This  lady,  Elizabeth  Stewart  of  GrandtuUy,  by  the  foresaid  Thomas  Stewart 
her  husband,  had  a  son,  Thomas  Stewart,  whom  she  calls  filius  suits  et  htsres  ap- 
parens,  when  she  dispones  him  the  fee  of  several  parts  of  her  estate,  which  is 
confirmed  by  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal  in  the  pubUc  registers;  but  he  dy- 
ing without  issue,  and  his  mother  quickly  thereafter,  she  was  succeeded  in  the 
estate  of  GrandtuUy  by  her  cousin-german  Thomas  Stewart  of  GrandtuUy.  This 
point  of  the  succession  of  the  House  of  GrandtuUy  is  instructed  incontrovertibly 
by  a  precept  out  of  the  Chancery,  for  serving  and  retouring  of  Thomas  Stewart  de 
Gairntully  in  the  lands  of  Banchory,  "  tanquam  legitimus  et  propinquior  h?eres 
•'  quonda.n  Elizabetha;  Stuart,  filia;  et  hsredis  quondam  Thomie  Stuart  de  Gairn- 
"  tuU,  fili:e  patrui  sui  :"  This  is  of  the  date  the  loth  of  February  1542  (w).  This 
Thomas  Stewart  of  GrandtuUy,  so  succeeding  his  cousin-germain,  married  Elizabeth 
Stewart,  daughter  of  John,  the  second  of  that  line  of  the  Earls  of  Athol  (x),  and 
dying  in  the  year  1575,  left  issue  Sir  Thomas  Stewart  of  GrandtuUy,  his  eldest  son 
and  heir,  who  was  one  of  the  Gentlemen  of  the  Bed-chamber  to  his  majesty  King 
James  VI.  (  v)-  He  married  Grissel,  daughter  of  Sir  Laurence  Mercer  of  Aldie 
and  Moncloar,  as  appears  from  several  different  deeds  I  have  seen  in  the  hands  of 
Sir  George  Stewart  of  GrandtuUy ;  but  he  died  without  issue,  and  was  succeeded 
by  his  brother 

Sir  William  Stewart,  who  was  from  his  youth  bred  up  at  the  court  of  King 
James,  before  his  accession  to  the  crown  of  England  :  He  was  first  designed  of 
Banchry,  lands  which  he  acquired  from  Sir  Thomas  Stewart  of  GrandtuUy,  his  bro- 
Ther-german.  He  had  the  honour  to  be  attending  on  the  king  his  master  from 
the  palace  of  Falkland  to  the  town  of  Perth,  in  the  memorable  5th  day  of  August 
i6oo,  when  John  Earl  of  Gowrie,  and  Mr  Alexander  Ruthven,  his  brother,  attempt- 
ed to  embrue  their  hands. in  the  sacred  blood  of  their  sovereign:  In  his  majesty's 
happy  preservation  Sir  William  Stewart  of  Banchory  was  eminently  instrumen- 
tal (z),  which  his  majesty  King  Charles  I.  had  the  goodness  fully  to  set  forth  in 
tiie  narrative  and  preamble  of  a  charter  to  him  of  his  estate,  under  the  Great  Seal, 
in  the  public  records,  in  the  year  1637,  which  I  have  seen. 

Sir  William  Stewart  of  Banchory  went  to  England  with  the  king,  who  soon 
thereafter  promoted  him  to  be  one  of  the  Gentlemen  of  his  Majesty's  Bed-Cham- 
ber;  and,  getting  into  a  high  degree  of  confidence  and  favour,  he  came  quickly  to 

(0  Historical  deduction  of  the  deceiidants  of  IMurdoch  Duke  of  Albany  M3S.  penes  me.  (a)  CharU 
penes  D.  Gemgius  Stuart,  baronet,  (v)  Ibidem  ad  annum  1523,  uhich  I  have  seen.  («i)  Charta  penej 
D.  G.  S.  de  Gairntully.  (v)  Charta  in  publicls  archivis  ad  annum  1552,  and  the  Lord  Ochiltree's  Col- 
lections, MSS.  penes  me.  ( j')  Grant  to  him  in  the  records  of  the  Great  Seal,  and  so  designed.  (2)  This 
is  vouched  both  from  writs  I  have  seen  in  G.urntuUy's  hands,  and  from  several  charters  and  documents 
In  the  public  records. 

T^oL.  II.  5  Z 


154 


APPENDIX. 


acquire  the  lands  and  barony  of  Strathbrand,  from  whence  he  took  his  designation, 
and  is  so  designed,  and  Gentleman  of  our  Sovereign  Lord's  Chamber  in  1606,  in 
several  charters  of  lands  under  the  Great  Seal  in  the  public  archives  which  I  have 
seen.  He  succeeded  his  elder  brother,  Sir  Thomas,  in  the  estate  of  Grandtully,  and 
continued  in  high  favour  with  King  James  till  his  death  in  the  year  1625.  Sir 
William  Stewart  of  Gairntully  was  no  less  esteemed  by  his  Majesty  King  Charles 
than  he  had  been  by  his  father  King  James ;  for  he  continued  him  in  the  Bed- 
chamber, and  always  treated  him  with  peculiar  and  distinguishing  marks  of  his 
royal  favour:  witness  the  charter  he  had  from  the  crown,  of  his  estate  in  the  1637, 
we  formerly  noticed,  wherein  his  long  and  faithful  services  are  very  remarkably 
taken  notice  of  and  set  forth. 

He  married  Agnes  Moncreif,  daughter  of  Sir  John  Moncrieff  of  that  Ilk,  a  very 
ancient  family  in  the  shire  of  Perth,  by  Jean  his  wife,  daughter  of  Mr  John  Spence 
of  Condie,  Lord  Advocate  to  Queen  Mary  and  King  James  VI.  (a),  by  whom  he 
had  four  sons,  viz. 

Sir  Thomas  Stewart  of  Grandtully  his  eldest  son. 

Sir  WiLLi.\M  Stewart  of  Innernytie,  the   second  son,  who  married 

Crichton,  co-heiress  of  Innernytie,  and  had  issue,  John  Stewart  of  Innernytie  his 
son  and  heir,  who  married  Jean,  daughter  of  James  Lord  Lindores,  and  had  by  her 
a  son,  his  heir,  John  Stewart  of  Innernytie,  who  married  Mary,  daughter  of  Sir 
James  Mercer  of  Aldie,  and  had  one  daughter,  Anne,  married  to  David  the  present 
Viscount  of  Stormont. 

James  Stewart  of  Ludd  was  the  third  son,  whose  male  issue  is  failed,  but  of  an 
heir-female  of  him  is  sovne,  and  descended  the  Menzieses  of  Culdares,  &c. 

Mr  Henry  Stewart,  Advocate,  the  fourth  son,  the  paternal  ancestor  of  Sir 
George  Stewart,  now  of  Grandtully,  baronet. 

Sir  Thomas  Stewart  of  Grandtully  succeeded  his  father  Sir  William  in  his  great 
and  opulent  estate:  He  married  Grissel,  daughter  of  Sir  Alexander  Menzies  of 
Weem,  (son  of  Sir  James  Menzies  of  Weem,  and  Dame  Barbara  Stewart  his  wife, 
daughter  of  John  Earl  of  Athol)  by  Dame  Margaret  Campbell  his  wife,  daughter 
and  co-heir  with  her  sister  the  Lady  Bargeny,  of  Alexander  Campbell  of  Carcko, 
Bishop  of  Brechin,  brother  to  Sir  James  Campbell  of  Ardkinlas,  by  Helen  his 
wife,  daughter  of  George  Clephan  of  Carslogie,  by  whom  he  had  John  Stewart  his 
son  and  heir,  and  eight  daughters. 

Jean,  the  eldest,  was  married  to  Colonel  Sir  James  Mercer  of  Aldie,  and  had 
issue. 

Marjory,  the  second,  to  David  Fotheringham,  son  and  heir  apparent  of  Mr 
John  Fotheringham  of  Powrie,  and  had  issue. 

Grissel,  the  third,  to  Sir  John  Drummond  of  Logie-Almond,  second  son  to 
John  second  Earl  of  Perth,  and  had  issue. 

Anne,  the  fourth,  to  James  Seaton  of  Touch,  and  had  only  one  daughter,  who 
was  married  to  James  Moir  of  Leckie,  and  had  issue. 

Cecil,  the  fifth  daughter,  was  married  to Stewart  of  Arntillie,  but  had 

no  issue. 

Margaret,  the  sixth,  to Campbell,  son  to Campbell  of  Lawers, 

and  had  issue. 

Helen,  the  seventh,  to  James  Crichton  of  Ruthven,  and  had  issue. 
Elizabeih,  the  eighth  and  youngest,  to  David,  the  second  Lord  Newark,  and 
had  issue. 

John  Stewart  of  Grandtully,  son  and  heir  of  Sir  Thomas  Stewart  of  Grandtully, 
succeeded  his  father.  He  was  a  fine  gentleman,  and  a  great  encourager  and  pro- 
moter of  learning,  and  a  kind  and  bountiful  patron  of  learned  men :  He  died  a 
batchelor  on  the  5th  of  March  1720,  upon  whose  demise,  John  Stewart  of  Inner- 
nytie, his  heir-male,  by  virtue  of  the  investitures  of  the  estate,  would  have  suc- 
ceeded to  the  estate  of  Grandtully,  but  he  being  attainted  of  high  trea&on,  by  an 
act  of  the  Parliament  of  Great  Britain,  for  his  accession  to  the  rebellion  in  1715, 
Grandtully  upon  that  made  a  settlement  of  his  estate  upon  certain  heirs  of  entail,  in 
virtue  of  which,  there  being  no  heir-male  existing  of  Innerny  tie's  body,  nor  of  any  other 

(a)  Ptnes  Sir  George  Stewart. 


APPENDIX.  155 

tolliiteral  heir-muk-  nearer  than  Sir  George  Stewart  of  Balcaskie,  baronet,  lie  ac- 
cordingly succeeded  to  the  estate  of  Crandtully  on  his  cousin's  death  in  the  year 
1720  aforesaid. 

Sir  George  Stewart  of  Grandtully's  ancestor  was  Mr  Henry  Stewart,  Advocate, 
fourth  and  youngest  son  of  Sir  William  Stewart  of  Grandtully,  by  Dame  Agnes 
Woncrief,  his  lady,  aforefaid  ;  being  a  younger  brother  he  was  bred  to  the  law, 
and  was  an  Advocate  before  the  Court  of  Session :  He  married  Mary,  daughter  ot 
Colin  Campbell  of  Aberuchill,  second  son  of  Sir  James  Campbell  of  Lawers,  and 
uncle  to  John  fust  Earl  of  Loudon,  who  was  Lord  High  Chancellor  in  the  reign  of 
King  Charles  L  and  IL;  by  whom  he  had  issue  Sir  Thomas  Stewart  of  Balcaskie, 
his  son  and  heir,  and  a  daughter,  Marjory^  who  w'as  married  to  William  Borthwick 
of  Pilmuir,  grandfather  to  Henry,  now  Lord  Borthwick. 

Sir  Thoimas  Stewart  of  Balcaskie,  being  also  bred  to  the  law,  was  promoted  to 
be  one  of  the  Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice,  and  by  letters  patent,  bearing 
date  the  2d  of  January  1683,  he  was  created  a  baronet :  He  married  Lady  Jean  Mac- 
kenzie, daughter  of  George  Viscount  of  Tarbet,  and  after  Earl  of  Cromarty,  Lord 
Register  in  the  reigns  of  King  James  VIL  and  King  William,  and  Justice-General 
and  Secretary  of  State  in  the  reign  of  Q_iieen  Anne,  by  whom  he  had  two  sons,  the 
foresaid  Sir  George  Stewart  of  Balcaskie,  who  succeeded  by  virtue  of  the  said  en- 
tail to  the  estate  of  Grandtully,  as  is  heretofore  remarked  in  the  memorial,  and  Co- 
lonel John  Stewart,  the  second  son,  who  married  his  first  cousin,  Elizabeth,  daugh- 
ter of  Sir  James  Mackenzie  of  Royston,  baronet,  one  of  the  Senators  of  the  College 
of  Justice,  and  has  a  son,  John  Stewart. 

Which  Sir  George  Stewart,  now  of  Grandtully,  baronet,  is  married  with  Dame 
Agnes  Cockburn,  daughter  of  Sir  Archibald  Cockburn  of  Langton,  baronet. 


MEMORIAL    OF    THE    ANCIENT    FAMILY    OF  EDMONSTONE,    MORE    PARTICULARLY  OF 

THE  House  of  Duntreath. 


THE  surname  and  family  of  Edmonstone  is  of  very  great  and  eminent  antiquity; 
some  are  of  opinion  they  are  originally  extracted  from  the  illustrious  family  of  the 
Counts  d'Egmont  in  Germany ;  others  again  conjecture,  from  the  identity  of  the 
arms  of  the  surname  of  Edmonstone  with  those  of  Seaton,  that  they  are  of  the  same 
stem  and  origin  with  them  ;  for  it  is  a  received  maxim  among  heralds,  that  arms, 
or  armorial  bearings,  are  surer  marks  of  the  same  blood  and  kindred  than  even  sur- 
names, especially  in  descents  of  greater  antiquity:  But  waving  this,  we  may  ob- 
serve, for  the  antiquity  of  the  Edmonstones,  what  our  learned  antiquary  Sir  James 
Dalrymple  has  considered  to  have  been  the  original  ancestor  of  this  family,  viz. 
that  one  Edmumius,  or  Admiinduj,  a  person  of  note  in  the  reign  of  King  David  L 
who  is  witness  to  the  charter  granted  by  that  prince  of  the  lands  of  Riddel,  Wal~ 
te/o  de  Riddle,  militi  (b),  got  from  the  same  king  lands  in  Laudonia,  now  the  shire 
of  Edinburgh,  which,  according  to  a  humour  and  custom  of  men  calling  their  lands 
after  their  own  name  at  that  time,  he  called  Admonston,  or  Edmonston,  and  trans- 
mitted it  as  a  surname  or  hereditary  appellation  to  his  descendants.  This  conjec- 
ture of  the  learned  and  ingenious  author  is  supported,  and  in  some  measure  con- 
firmed by  a  charter  of  mortification  in  the  reign  of  King  Alexander  IL  OTmo  12 12, 
by  IVi/lie/mus  de  Crai^millar,  filius  Henrici  de  Craigmillar,  whereby  he  gives  in  pure 
and  perpetual  alms  to  the  church  and  monastery  of  Dunfermline,  "  quandam 
"  Tostumterre  in  Craigmillar,  in  australi  parte  qui  ducit  de  villa  de  Niddreif  ad 
"  ecclesiam  de  Libberton,  quas  Henricus  de  Edmonston  de  me  tenet  (c).  It  w  ould 
be  foreign  to  the  design  of  what  is  intended  by  this  memorial,  to  give  a  regular 

fi)  Appendix  to  Sir  James  Dalrymple's  Collections.  (<r)  The  Earl  of  Haddingtoii'.<  Collections 
from  the  registers  and  chartularies  now  in  the  Lawyers'  Library  at  Edinburgh, 


156  APPENDIX. 

deduction  of  the  whole  lineal  descent  of  the  ancient  family  of  Edmonstone;  all 
that  is  proper  here,  is  to  give  some  hints  of  their  antiquity,  and  some  of  the  most 
memorable  things  relating  to  them,  to  illustrate  the  honour  and  dignity  of  the 
House  of  Edmonstone;  and  therefore  we  shall  come  to  take  notice  of  Sir  John 
Edmonstone,  knight,  iniles,  as  we  find  him  designed  (6),  who  made  no  small  figure 
in  the  reign  of  K.ing  David  II.  This  gentleman  seems  to  have  had  a  more  than 
ordinary  degree  of  favour  from  that  prince,  and  which,  we  may  very  rationally 
conclude,  was  to  reward  his  signal  and  eminent  loyalty  and  merit ;  for  there  is  a 
charter  still  extant  in  the  rolls  of  that  king  (c),  "  Dilecto  et  fideli  suo  Joanni  Ed- 
*'  monston,  militi,  de  baronia  de  Boyne,  in  vicecomitatu  de  Bamff,"  dated  the  17th 
of  March  1369. 

As  this  noble  knight  had  a  fair  estate  in  the  south,  that  seems  very  clearly  to 
have  been  their  ancient  patrimonial  estate,  so  it  is  plain  he  had  also  fair  possessions 
in  the  northern  parts  of  the  realm;  for  we  see  that  he  had  not  only  the  thanedom 
and  barony  of  Boyne,  but  also  lands  further  north,  the  barony  of  CuUoden  in  the 
county  of  Inverness,  which  came  to  his  son  Sir  William  Edmonstone  of  Culloden, 
as  we  find  him  designed  in  many  authentic  deeds  and  vouchers  that  are  in  my 
hands,  and  lying  before  me  at  the  writing  and  drawing  up  of  this  memorial,  who 
was  the  first  of  the  Edmonstones  that  had  the  barony  of  Duntreath,  of  whom  after- 
ward. The  same  Sir  John  Edmonstone,  knight,  aforesaid,  had,  in  further  remune- 
ration of  his  fidelity  and  loyal  services,  from  King  David,  a  charter  "  de  officio 
"  Coronatorie  Laudonie,"  Laudonea  now,  being  by  this  time  restricted  to  the 
sherifixlom  of  Edinburgh,  the  grant  is  to  himself  "  haeredibus  suis  et  suis  assignatis," 
and  is  of  date  the  5th  of  November,  the  33d  of  the  king's  reign  (rf).  As  he  had  a 
good  degree  of  favour  with  King  David,  he  seems  to  have  been  no  less  in  the 
confidence  of  his  nephew  and  successor  King  Robert  II.  the  first  of  the  Stewartine 
line  of  our  kings ;  for  that  king  did  him  the  honour  to  bestow  his  own  daughter 
upon  him  in  marriage,  the  Lady  Isabel,  who  was  the  widow  and  relict  of  the  noble 
and  heroic  patriot  James  Earl  of  Douglas  and  Marr,  who  was  slain  at  the  battle  of 
Otterburn  in  the  1388.  There  is  a  charter  granted  by  King  Robert  II.  "  Joanni 
"  de  Edmonston,  militi,  et  Isobelae  comitissic  de  Douglas  sponsae  suae  filias  nostrae 
"  carissimfe"  {/).  Having  survived  his  father-in-law  King  Robert  II.  he  appears  to 
have  been  a  favourite  with  his  brother-in-law  Robert  III. ;  he  gives  him  a  charter 
imder  the  Great  Seal,  ratifying  and  confirming  a  former  deed  and  grant  by  the 
king  his  father  to  this  gentleman,  "  Joanni  de  Edmonston,  militi,  et  Isobelas 
"  sponsae  suae  comitissae  de  Douglas,  sorori  nostrae  carissimee,  de  terris  baronie  de 
'•  Ednem  in  vicecomitatu  de  Roxburgh;"  the  grant  is  to  themselves  in  conjunct 
infeftment,  and  to  their  heirs  in  fee,  "  eorum  alteri  divitiis  viventi  et  hjeredibus 
"  inter  ipsos  legitimi  procreatis  seu  procreandis;"  the  charter  bears  date  from  Edin- 
burgh the  25th  of  April,  the  third  year  of  the  king's  reign,  that  is  the  year  of  our 
Lord  1392.  During  the  reign  of  Robert  III.  Sir  John  Edmonstone  of  that  Ilk  was 
employed  as  a  commissioner  and  plenipotentiary  in  divers  treaties  betwixt  the  two 
nations  of  Scotland  and  England:  He  was  also  after  the  king's  death,  during  the 
regency  of  the  Duke  of  Albany  his  brother  in-law,  employed  as  a  plenipotentiary 
in  three  different  treaties  with  England  in  the  1407,  1408,  1409,  successive,  as 
may  be  seen  by  the  curious  in  the  Foedera  Angliae  published  by  the  learned  Tho- 
mas Rymer,  Esq.  the  contents  of  the  different  treaties,  and  his  colleagues  in  the 
commission,  would  be  too  prolix  to  enlarge  any  further  upon  in  this  memorial. 

This  same  Sir  John  Edmonstone  Lord  of  That  Ilk,  as  he  designed  himself,  with 
consent  of  Davy  of  Edmonstone,  his  son  and  apparent-heir,  did  enter  into  a  contract 
by  way  of  an  indenture,  as  they  call  it,  with  Patrick  Graham  Earl  Palatine  of  Stra- 
thern,  with  consent  and  assent  of  Euphame  Countess  of  Strathern,  his  spouse,  rela- 
tive to  a  charter  of  confirmation  they  had  obtained  and  procured  for  him  of  the 
lands  and  barony  of  Tulliallan ;  the  contract  bears  date  at  the  burgh  of  Perth,  the 
1st  of  April  1410  (/).     By  the  Lady  Isabel  his  wife   aforesaid,  daughter  of  King 

(i)  Charters  in  the  rolls  and  registers  of  King  David  II.  (r)  In  the  public  archives.  (</)  Ibid. 
(f)  Her  contract  with  the  Earl  of  Angus,  I  have  seen  and  perused,  in  the  1397,  in  the  charter-chest  of 
the  Duke  of  Douglas.  (/)  This  indenture  I  have  seen  in  the  hands  of  Mr  Matthew  Crawfurd,  laie  pro- 
fessor of  Ecclesiastical  History  of  the  University  of  Edinburgh,  from  whence  the  date  of  this  writ  is 
taken. 


APPENDIX.  J  ST 

Robert  II.  he  left  issue  Sir'David  Edmonstone  of  that  Ilk,  whom,  in  thaiters  under 
the  Great  Seal,  the  Duke  of  Albany,  Regent,  calls,  nepoti  meo  and  ncpos  noster,  that 
is  very  clear  and  plaui,  his  nephew,  by  Ins  sister  the  Lady  Isabel  Countess  of  Doug- 
las (^),  and  a  second  son,  Su'  William  Edmonstone  of  CuUoden,  the  direct  and  im- 
mediate ancestor  of  the  family  of  the  Edmonstones  of  the  House  of  Duntreath  {b). 
Sir  David  Edmonstone  of  that  Ilk  was  succeeded  by  his  son  and  heir 

Sir  James  Edmonstone  of  tliat  Ilk  or  Edmonstone :  1  have  seen  his  retour  and  ser- 
vice to  Sir  David,  his  father,  in  the  lands  of  Easter  Hailes,  which  he  held  of  the  ab- 
bot and  convent  of  Dunfermline  (i).  This  Sir  JameJ  had  a  new  investiture  of 
his  estate  under  the  Great  Seal  of  K-ing  James  11.  in  the  1458,  in  the  public  regis- 
ters. He  married  Janet,  daughter  of  Sir  Alexander  Napier  of  iVIerchiston,  ances- 
tor to  the  Lord  Napier,  and  died  without  issue-male,  leaving  two  daughters;  Eliza- 
beth, who  was  married  to  Sir  \Valter  Ogilvie,  second  son  of  Sir  Walter  Ogilvie  of 
Findlater  and  Deskford,  and  got  in  marriage-portion  with  her  the  lands,  barony  and 
thanedome  of  Boyne  in  Banffshire  (yt) ;  Margaret,  the  other  daughter,  was  married 
to  Sir  Patrick  Biackadder,  second  son  to  Andrew  Blackadder  of  that  Ilk  in  the 
county  of  B.r.vick,  nepliew  to  Robert  the  tirst  Archbishop  of  the  Episcopal  See 
of  Glasgow,  and  got  with  the  lady  his  wife,  as  co-heir  to  her  father,  the  lands  and 
barony  of  Tulhallan  in  the  county  of  Clackmanan  (/).  And  upon  this  account 
it  is  that  both  the  families  of  Ogilvie  of  Boyne,  and  Blackadder  of  Tulliallan  car- 
ry the  three  crescents,  the  coat  of  the  Edmonstones,  quartered  in  the  second  and 
third  quarter  of  their  respective  achievements. 

But  since  this  memorial  has  a  special  reference  to  the  family  of  Duntreath,  we 
shall  return  to  Sir  William  Edmonstone,  the  second  son  of  Sir  John  Edmonstone  of 
that  Ilk,  brother  to  Sir  David,  and  uncle  to  Sir  James  Edmonstone  of  that  Ilk  that 
left  the  two  heirs-female,  and  the  direct  and  immediate  ancestor  of  the  family  of 
Duntreath,  to  whom  and  his  descendants  we  shall  confine  this  memorial.  That  he 
got  in  patrimony  from  his  father  the  lands  and  barony  of  CuUoden  in  the  county 
of  Inverness  we  have  already  hinted,  and  from  whence  we  find  him  designed  be- 
fore he  got  the  barony  of  Duntreath. 

This  gentleman  being  a  person  of  merit,  joined  to  his  illustrious  birth,  had  the 
honour  of  knighthood  conferred  on  him  by  King  James  I. ;  and  as  his  own  mother  was 
a  daughter  of  the  crown,  the  Lady  Isabel  Countess  of  Douglas,  as  has  been  here- 
tofore remarked  in  this  memorial,  so  he  had  the  honour  himself  to  make  a  new 
and  fresh  alliance  with  the  royal  family  ;  for  he  married  the  Lady  Mary,  the  eld- 
est daughter  of  King  Robert  III.  (;«).  She  was  the  widow  of  George  Earl  of  An- 
gus, ancestor  to  the  Duke  of  Douglas,  of  James  Kennedy  of  Dunnure,  the  ances- 
tor of  the  Earl  of  Cassilis,  and  of  Sir  William  Graham  of  Kincardine,  ancestor  to 
the  Duke  of  Montrose.  With  this  lady  King  James  11.  her  nephew,  gave,  by  his 
charter  under  the  Great  Seal,  the  lands  of  Duntreath.  There  is  in  the  custody  of 
the  present  Archibald  Edmonstone  of  Duntreath,  Esq.  the  said  charter:  "  Willielmo 
"  Edmonston  de  Colloden,  militi,  et  Maria:  Comitissas  de  Angus  sponsa?  su;e,  ami- 
"  tae  nostrse  carissim;e,  et  eorum  alteri  divius  viventi  in  conjuncta  infiadatione,  et 
"  Willielmo  de  Edmonston  eorum  filio  in  feodo  et  hereditate."  In  the  charter  the 
haill  lands  are  erected,  united,  and  incorporated  into  one  free  and  entire  barony,  to 
be  called  the  barony  of  Duntreath,  in  the  1452.  The  lands  of  Duntreath  were  before 
that  in  the  crown,  by  the  attainder  of  Duncan,  the  last  of  the  line  of  the  old  Earls 
of  Lennox,  who  had  been  fortaulted  by  King  James  I.  in  the  1426.  This  Sir 
William  Edmonstone  of  CuUoden  died  in  the  year  1462  (n),  and  left  issue  by 
Mary  Countess  of  Angus,  his  wife  aforesaid,  only  one  son,  William,  who  was  his 
father's  heir  and  successor  in  his  estate,  and  a  daughter,  Matilda,  who  was  mar- 
ried to  Sir  Adam.  Cunningham  of  Caprington,  in  the  shire  of  Ayr,  and  had  is- 
sue (0). 

{g)  In  the  public  archivesr  (4)  C'larta  penes  D.  Duntreath.  (/)  In  the  Chartulary  of  that  mo- 
nastery in  the  Lawyer's  Library,  (i)  Penes  Ogilvie  de  Rothemay  in  1485,  which  I  have  seen.  (/)  Char- 
ta  ad  annum  1485,  which  I  have  seen,  relating  to  the  division  of  the  lands  betwixt  these  two  ladies  the 
daughters  and  co-heirs  of  Sir  James  Edmonstone  of  that  Ilk.  (m)  Ctiarta  penes  dominum  Duntreath. 
(n)  Charta  penes  D.  Duntreath.     (o)  Ibidem.  3 

Vol.  II.  6  A 


158  APPENDIX.     ' 

Sir  William  Epmonstone  of  CuUoden  and  Duntreath,  having  fixed  his  residence 
in  the  west  at  Duntreath,  in  the  county  of  Stirling,  and  though  he  kept  the  estate 
of  Culloden  till  long  after  this,  yet  he  relinquished  that  title,  and  took  the  designa- 
tion of  Duntreath,  which  his  successors  have  continued  ever  since  to  do.  This 
gentleman  being  royally  descended  both  by  his  mother  and  grandmother,  who  were 
daughters  of  the  crown,  he  was  the  first  that  1  see  of  the  family  of  Duntreath 
that  assumed  and  took  the  double  tressure  round  his  arms  as  a  maik  of  his  descent 
from  the  royal  family.  His  seal  I  have  seen  supported  by  two  lions  rampant, 
and  circumscnbed,  Sigillum  IVillielnii  Edmonston  de  Duntreath  (p),  the  same  as  it 
is  matriculated  in  the  register  of  the  Lyon-Olfice  at  Edinburgh;  yet  it  is  pretty  odd 
that  Mr  Nisbet  has  not  taken  the  least  notice  of  it  in  his  Treatise  of  Heraldry, 
though  he  had  access  to  the  Lyon  Register  when  he  pleased.  This  gentleman,  the 
second  in  the  line  of  the  family  of  Duntreath,  made  a  very  noble  and  illustrious 
alliance  himself  by  marriage  ;  for  his  lady  was  Matilda  Stewart  (cj),  grandchild, 
by  his  son  Lord  James,  of  Murdoch  Duke  of  Albany,  Governor  and  Regent  of  Scot- 
land in  the  absence  of  King  James  L  The  lady  was  sister  to  Sir  Andrew  Stewart 
of  Strathaven,  thereafter  Lord  Evandale,  who  was  long  Chancellor  of  Scotland  in 
the  reign  of  King  James  111.  and  to  Walter  Stewart  of  Morphy-Frissel,  the  paternal 
ancestor  of  the  Lords  of  Evandale  and  Ochiltree,  and  of  the  present  Earl  of  Mur- 
ray as  Lord  Doune.  By  this  lady,  his  wife,  he  had  two  sons,  Archibald,  his  heir  and 
successor,  and  a  young  brother,  William  Edmonstone,  who  had  a  charter  from  the 
crown  of  the  lands  of  Buchynhadrick,  in  the  stewartry  of  Monteith  (/)  ;  likewise 
a  daughter  Mary,  who  was  married  to  Sir  William  Cunningham  of  Glengarnock  in 
the  shire  of  Ayr  (s),  and  had  issue.  1  find  that  this  gentleman,  William  Edmon- 
stone of  Duntreath,  was  in  the  reign  of  King  James  III.  one  of  the  Lords  of 
the  Session  for  administration  of  justice  in  the  1472  (t),  and  died  the  year 
thereafter  1473. 

Sir  Archibald  Edmonstone  of  Duntreath,  the  third  of  the  line  in  the  family, 
was  served  and  retoured  heir  to  his  father  in  the  1473,  as  is  vouched  from  the  pre- 
cept out  of  the  Chancery  for  that  effect,  which  I  have  seen  in  the  charter-chest  of 
the  family. 

This  gentleman  was  in  high  favour  both  with  King  James  III.  and  IV.  By  this  last 
prince  he  had  the  honour  of  knighthood  conferred  on  him,  and  made  Captain  of 
his  Majesty's  Castle  of  Doune,  and  Steward  of  Monteith  and  Strathgartney  (n). 
He  married  Janet,  daughter  of  Sir  James  Shaw  of  Sauchie,  Comptroller  of  Scot-  ' 
land  in  the  reign  of  King  James  III.  (v).  This  turned  out  a  very  beneficial  and 
advantageous  match  to  the  family  of  Duntreath  ;  for  the  lady  was  a  niece  to 
George,  abbot  of  Paisley,  who  was  an  opulent  prelate,  and  Lord  Treasurer  of  Scot- 
land under  King  James  IV.  who  took  care  to  provide  matches  for  his  nieces,  and 
got  them  married  into  many  of  the  greatest  families  in  the  kingdom.  By  this 
lady  Sir  Archibald  Edmonstone  of  Duntreath  had  a  numerous  issue  ;  first, 

Sir  W^iLLiAM  the  eldest  son,  the  heir  of  the  family. 

James  Edmonstone  the  second  son,  of  whom  sprung  that  branch  of  the  Edmon- 
tones  of  the  House  of  Duntreath  who  were  first  designed  by  the  title  of  Broik  in 
the  county  of  Stirling. 

Jacob  Edmonstone,  a  third  son,  of  whom  descended  the  Edmonstones  of  Balington 
in  the  stewartry  of  Monteith. 

He  had  also  these  following  daughters,  all  honourably  and  nobly  allied,  and  are 
instructed  and  clearly  vouched  from  contracts  of  marriage,  or  discharges  of  the 
marriage-portions,  vviiich  I  have  had  the  honour  to  peruse  in  the  archives  of  the. 
family,  and  from  thence  fhey  arc  all  instructed  {w)-. 

Janet,  the  eldest,  was  married  to  William  the  first  earl  of  the  illusti-ious  family, 
of  Montrose,  and  had  issue. 

(/p)  Charta  penes  Graham  de  Garvock,  ad  annum  1473,  and  also  in  tlie  custody  of  the  Laud  of  Dun- 
treath. (y)  Charta  penes  dominum  Duntreath,  ad  annum  1456.  (/•)  Charter  under  the  Great  Seal,  &ci 
(.r)  Charta  penes  Vicecomitem  de  Garnock,  who  is  now  proprietor  of  the  estate  of  Glengarnock,  and- 
has  the  writs  of  the  family,  which  I  have  seen  and  perused.  (/)  President  Spottiswood's  Practicks. 
(a)  Charta  penes  dominum  Duntreath.  (v)  Charta  in  publicis  archivis,  etiam  charta  penes  dominum. 
Duntreath.     (ir)  Charta  penes  dominum  Duntreath. 


APPENDIX.  159 

Catharine,  the  second,  to  John  Master  of  Eglinton,  son  and  heh'-apparent  of 
Hugh  the  first  PLirl  of  Eguntoii,  and  hud  issue. 

CuRisriAN,  the  third,  to  Jolin  the  second  Lord  Ross  of  H;ilkhcad  and  Mel- 
ville, and  had  issue. 

Margaret,  the  fourth,  to  George  Buchanan  of  that  Ilk,  at  that  time  grandsoiv 
and  heir-apparent  of  Walter  Buchanan  of  tliat  Ilk,  and  had  issue. 

Beatrix,  the  fifth,  to  Jajues  Muscliet  of  Burnbank,  commonly  called  the  Laird 
of  Muschet,  in  the  stewartry  of  Monteith  and  shcrilldom  of  Perth,  then  a  very 
considerable  family,  and  tiad  is^ue. 

Sir  Archibald  Edmonstone  of  Duntrcath  died  ia  the  1502  (,v),  and  was  suc- 
ceeded by 

Sir  William  Edmonstone  his  son  and  heir,  who  was  knighted  by  King  James  IV. 
and  appointed  Ciptain  and  Keeper  of  tiie  Castle  of  Doune,  and  Steward  of  the 
stewartry  of  Monteith,  as  is  vouched  from  the  comiuisson  under  the  Great  Seal, 
which  1  have  seen. 

He  married,  first,  Sibilla,  daughter  of  Sir  William  Baillie  of  Lamington  in   the 

county  of  Lanark  (  r),  and  after  that  Sibilla,  daughter  of Carmichael  of 

that  Ilk,  in  the  county  of  Lanark  (^).  Tins  Sir  i  k  lUiam  Edmonstone  of  Duntrcath 
conceiving  that  his  ancient  estate  of  the  barony  of  CuUoden,  tiiat  had  been  the 
patrimonial  estate  of  his  family,  lay  at  a  great  distance  from  liim,  and  therefore 
he  thought  fit  to  alienate  these  lands  to  Alexand<.-r  SLiachan  of  Scotston,  which  is 
coiifinnod  by  a  charter  under  the  Great  Saal  in  the  public  records,  bearing  date 
the  30fh  of  July  1306  (a). 

Sir  William  Edmonstone  of  Duntrcath  was  slain  under  the  standard  of  his  royal 
master  and  sovereign  King  James  IV.  at  the  battle  in  Northumberland,  as  its  cal- 
led, or  the  field  of  FloJden,  the  9th  of  September  of  the  year  15 13,  leaving  issue 
William,  his  heir  and  successor,  Archibald,  the  second  son,  of  whom  came  the 
Edmonstones  of  Spittalton  (/)),  James  Edmonstone,  the  third,  of  whom  issued  the 
Edmonstones  of  the  Newtown  of  Doune,  the  Edmonstones  of  Cambus- Wallace  and 
Coldoch  (f);  also  several  daughters, — Marion,  the  eldest,  who  was  married  to  John 
Campbell  ot  Glenorchy,  paternal  ancestor  to  the  Earl  of  Breadalbane,  and  had  is- 
sue ((/J,   Agnes,  the  second  to  Robert  Hamilton  of  Inchmachan  and  Kinkell,  and 

had  iasue  ;  Marjory,  the  thi;d,  to Stewart  of  Craigarnelle,  and  had 

issue  ;  Margaret,  the  fourth,  to  John  Logan  of  Balvie,  at  that  time  an  ancient  and 
right  considerable  family  in  the  county  of  Dumbarton  (f),  and  had  issue. 

Sir  William  Edmonstone  of  Duntrcath,  the  son  and  heir  of  Sir  W.lliam  the  last 
mentioned,  was  served  and  retoured  heir  to  his  father  by  virtue  of  a  precept  di- 
rected forth  of  the  Chancery  for  that  effect,  bearing,  that  his  umquhile  father  died, 
"  obiit  sub  vexillo  quondam  domini  nostri  regis  in  bello  de  Northumberland." 
His  sasine  that  followed  thereon  is  dated  the  2d  of  May  1516  (/). 

This  same  year  this  William  Edmonstone,  and  Archibald  Edmonstone,  his  brother, 
are  made  joint  captains  and  keepers  of  the  Castle  of  Doune,  and  stewards  of  the 
stewartry  of  Monteith  and  Strathgartney  :  He  married  first  Lady  Agnes  Stewart, 
daughter  of  Matthew  the  first  Earl  of  the  line  of  the  Stewarts  Earls  ot  Lennox  (j)^ 
and  after  her  death  Margaret  (b),  daughter  of  Sir  James  Campbell  of  Lawers,  pa- 
ternal ancestor  to  the  present  Earl  of  Loudon,  and  had  issue  Sir  James,  his  suc- 
cessor, and  five  daughters. 

Eliz.^eth,  who  was  married  to  John  Stirling,  son  and  heir-apparent  to  Walter 
Stirling  of  Ballagan  (/),  and  had  issue  Janet,  who  was  married  to  Luke  Stirling 
of  Band,  and  had  issue  (^k). 

Marjory,  wiio  was  married  to  Mungo  Graham  of  Rattern  and  Urchill,  son  to 
W'illi-i  n  tue  second  Earl  of  Montrose,  and  had  issue  {/). 

Sibilla,  who  was  raarned  to  John  Stewart,  at  that  time  son  and  heir-apparent  to 
Matthew  St  wart  of  Barscabe  (m),  in  the  shire  of  Renfrew,  who  was  a  son  of  the 
House  of  Lennox,  and  had  issue. 

(.v)  Charta  penes  dominura  Duntrcath,  etiam  in  rotulis  1509.  (y)  Charta  in  publicis  archivis  ad  an- 
num 1509.  («)  I.i  the  Registers  of  the  Privy  Seal  1506.  (a)  Charta  penes  dominum  Duntreath. 
(i)  luidem.  (_c)  C'aatta  in  publicis  archivis  ad  annum  1546.  (</)  Charta  penes  dominum  Duntreath. 
(e)  Ibidem.  (/J  Charta  in  :.;.blicis  .\rchivis  ad  annum  1316.  (^)  C  arta  penes  clon.inum  Duntreath  ad 
annum  1522.  ('A^  Ibidem.  (^/)  Charta^ad  annum  1545.  (i)  Charta peiics  dominum  Duutreath.  (/)  ibidem. 
(ot)  Ibidem. 


ifio  APPENDIX. 

Anabella,  who  was  married  to  John  Stirling,  son  and  heir-apparent  of  George 
Stirhng  of  Glorat,  Captain  and  Governor  in  chief  of  the  Castle  of  Dumbarton  («), 
and  had  issue. 

Marion,  the  fourth  daughter,  was  married  to  David  Semple  of  Nobleston  (o), 
in  the  county  of  Dumbarton,  and  had  issue  ;  after  that  to  Robert  Denniston  of 
Colgrain  in  the  foresaid  county,  and  had  issue  ;  and  last  of  all  to  John  Shaw  of 
Bargarran,  in  the  barony  and  sheriffdom  of  Renfrew. 

This  gentleman  being  a  near  relation  and  ally  of  the  House  of  Lennox,  was  in 
•'.very  respect  much  attached  to  the  interest  of  that  illustrious  family  :  upon  the  re- 
-toration  of  Matthew  Earl  of  Lennox  in  the  1565,  when  his  son  Henry  Lord  Darn- 
]y  was  married  to  Q^ieen  Mary,  the  Laird  of  Duntreath  was  brought  into  the  Pri- 
vy Council  (/)),  and  soon  after  that  he  had  the  honour  of  knighthood  conferred  on 
him  ;  for  in  the  records  of  council,  when  he  is  marked  present,  he  is  designed 
tVillielmus  Edmonston  de  Duntreath  (^q). 

Sir  James  Edmonstone  of  Duntreath  succeeded  his  father  Sir  William ;  he  was 
made  a  knight  by  King  James  VL  and  had  a  good  share  of  favour  and  countenance 
from  that  prince  before  he  left  Scotland,  and  went  into  England.  He  married 
Helen,  daughter  of  Sir  James  Stirling  of  Keir  (r),  by  Jean  his  wife,  daughter  of 
Dr  William  Chisholm,  Bishop  of  Dumblane,  who  was  a  brother  of  the  House  of 
Cromlicks,  in  the  county  of  Perth,  and  had  issue  by  her,  Wilham  his  eldest  son, 
who  succeeded  him,  and  a  younger  son,  Mr  John  Edmonstone ;  also  three  daugh- 
ters. 

Mary,  the  eldest,  was  married  to  Sir  John  Cunningham  of  Cunninghamhead  in 
rhe  county  of  Ayr,  and  had  issue. 

Marjory,  the  second,  to  Claud  Hamilton  of  Cocknay  (j-),  in  the  county  of  Dum- 
barton, and  had  issue. 

Helen,  the  third,  to  John  Lennox  of  Brarsogle  (<),  in  the  county  of  Stirling, 
and  had  issue. 

Sir  James  Edmonstone  of  Duntreath  married  to  his  second  wife  Margaret,  daugh- 
ter of  Sir  John  Colquhoun  of  Luss  (?/),  and  had  Robert  a  son,  and  Ehzabeth  a 
daughter,  who  was  married  to  James  Edmonstone  of  Balewn,  but  had  no  issue. 

William,  succeeded  his  father  Sir  James  Edmonstone,  in  his  estate  of  Duntreath. 
He  married  Isobel,  daughter  of  Mr  John  Haldane  of  Gleneagles,  a  very  ancient  fami- 
\y  in  Perthshire,  by  Isobel  his  wife,  daughter  of  Sir  David  Hume  of  Wedderburn 
in  the  county  of  Berwick,  by  whom  he  had  issue,  Archibald,  his  eldest  son  and- 
heir,  the  second  James,  the  third  John,  who  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  and  sole 
neir  of  James  Edmonstone  of  Broik,  and  had  a  numerous  issue,  which  has  produced 
a  great  many  younger  branches  of  the  family.  This  Laird  of  Duntreath  had  also 
two  daughters. 

Helen,  the  eldest,  was  married  to  John  Doloway  of  Belliehill,  Esq.  in  the  county 
of  Down  in  Ireland,  and  had  issue. 

Jean,  the  second  daughter,  was  married  to  Sir  Robert  Adair  of  Kilhill,  knight, 
in  the  county  of  Wigton,  and  had  issue.  He  died  in  the  year  1647,  ^^^  ^^'  snc- 
ceeded  by 

Archibald  his  son,  who  was  a  member  of  Parliament  for  the  county  of  Stirling 
to  the  Parhament  1633,  wherein  his  majesty  King  Charles  I.  was  present  in  his 
own  royal  person.  This  gentleman  married  Jean,  daughter  and  heir  of  Archibald 
Hamilton  of  Halcraig  in  the  county  of  Lanark,  brother  to  Sir  James  Hamilton 
Lord  Viscount  of  Claneboy,  ancestor  to  the  Earls  of  Clanbrassil,  of  the  kingdom 
of  Ireland,  by  whom  he  had  William  the  eldest  son,  who  being  dumb,  did  not 
succeed  Archibald  the  second  son,  his  father's  successor,  and  a  daughter  Helen, 
who  was  married  to  Thomas  Niven  of  Monkerden,  in  the  county  of  Ayr. 

Which  Archibald  Edmonstone  of  Duntreath  so  succeeding,  married  Anna  Helena, 
daughter  of  Colonel  Walter  Scott  of  Harlwood-Burn,  by  whom  he  had  Archibald 
his  son  and  heir. 

Elizabeth,  his  eldest  daughter,  was  married  to  James  Montgomery  of  Rosemond, 
Esq.  and  had  issue. 

Anna  Helena  to  Alexander  Dolowy  of  Belliehill,  Esq.  and  had  issue. 

(«)  Charta.in  publicis'arcliivis.  (0)  CViartain  the  charter-chest  of  the  family  of  Duntreath.  (/>)  IbidciE.- 
(9)  Charta  penes  D.  Duntreath.     (r)  Ibidem,     (j)  Ibidem.     (0  Ibidem,     (a)  Ibidem. 


APPENDIX.  i6i 

Archibald  Edmonstone,  the  present  Laird  of  Duntrcath,  married  Anne,  daugh- 
ter of  David  Lord  Cardross,  and  sister  to  the  present  Earl  of  Buchan,  and  had  only 
one  daughter,  Miss  Katharine  Edmonstone. 

He  married daughter  to  Mr  John  Campbell  of  Mamore,  son  to 

Archibald  Earl  of  Argyle,  and  uncle  to  his  grace  the  present  Duke  of  Argyle,  by 
whom  he  has 

Archibald  Edmonstone,  Esq.  his  eldest  son,  and  apparent  heir.     And 

Campbell  Edmonstone,  Esq.  &c. 

I  shall  conclude  this  memorial  by  adding  the  arms  of  the  family ;  and  this  I 
judge  the  more  necessary,  because  Mr  Nisbet  has  neglected  to  insert  the  coat-ar- 
morial of  Edmonstone  of -Duntreath,  out  of  the  register  of  the  Lyon  Office,  though 
it  is  there  recorded.  To  supply  that  neglect,  I  shall  blazon  it  as  follows  :  or,  three 
crescents,  within  a  double  tressure,  flowered  and  counter-flowered,  gules.  This 
addition  they  bear  of  the  double  tressure,  as  a  mark  of  their  descent  from  the  royal 
family,  just  in  the  same  manner  as  that  honorary  addition  is  borne  by  the  Earls  of 
Strathmore,andCassilis,and  Graham  of  Fintry.  The  supporters  are  two  lions  rampant, 
gules;  crest,  a  swan's  head  and  neck  issuing  out  of  a  ducal  crown.  Motto,  V'irtiis 
auget  honorcm. 


Memorial  for  the  family  of  STEWART  of  Burray. 


THE  title  of  Lord  Evandale  having  become  extinct  by  the  death  of  An- 
drew Lord  Evandale  in  the  148S,  without  heirs-male.  King  James  IV.  in  the  1499, 
honoured  Andrew  Stewart  of  Morphy,  the  said  lord's  grand-nephew,  with  the  dig- 
nity of  a  lord  of  Parliament  de  novo,  by  the  title  of  Lord  Evandale  {w^.  He  mar- 
ried Margaret  Kennedy,  daughter  of  Sir  John  Kennedy  of  Blairquhan,  in  the  shire 
of  Ayr,  by  whom  he  had  issue, 

Andrew  Lord  Evandale,  who,  by  act  of  Parliament,  got  his  title  changed  from 
Lord  Evandale  to  Lord  Stewart  of  Ochiltree,  in  the  1543,  of  whom  descended  the 
line  of  the  Lords  of  Ochiltree. 

Sir  Henry  Stewart,  the  second  son,  enjoyed  many  honourable  offices  in  the 
reign  of  King  James  V.  He  married  the  Queen  Dowager,  widow  of  King  James 
IV.  and  daughter  of  Henry  VII.  of  England;  upon  which  he  was  created  Lord 
Methven5th  September  1528  ;  the  family  failed  in  the  male  line  in  the  1595. 

Sir  James  Stewart  of  Beith,  the  third  son,  in  the  1534,  got  from  the  crown 
the  keeping  of  the  Castle  of  Doune,  with  the  stewartry  ot  Monteith,  and  was  slain 
by  the  Edmonstones  of  Duntreath  in  Dumblane,  on  the  15th  of  May  1547  (.v). 

Andrew  Lord  Evandale  had  besides  these  three  sons  a  daughter,  Barbara,  who 
was  married  first  to  Sir  James  Sinclair  of  Sanday,  knight,  and  again  to  Roderick 
M'Leod  of  the  Lewis :  By  Sir  James  Sinclair  she  had  no  issue  but  a  daughter,  who 
died  without  children.  By  Roderick  M'Leod  she  had  a  son,  Torquill,  who,  at  the  age 
of  twenty -four,  perished  at  sea,  and  Janet  M'Leod,  of  whom  afterwards.  This 
Barbara  feued  the  estate  of  Burray  from  the  bishop  of  Orkney. 

But  to  return  to  Sir  James  Stewart  of  Beith  :  He  left  issue  three  sons.  Sir  James, 
Mr  Henry,  and  Archibald  Stewart  of  Burray,  who  was  sometime  Provost  of  Edin- 
burgh, and  died  without  issue  (j),  and  a  daughter  who  was  married  to  Sir  Robert 
Crichton  of  Cluny. 

Sir  James  Stewart,  the  eldest  son,  was  first  Commendator  of  St  Colme,  and  by 

(w)  Charta  in  publlcis  archivis  ad  annum  1499,  terrarum  de  Morphy-Frissel,  Andrese  Domino  Evan- 
dale, et  MargaretiE  Kennedy  sponsae  suEe.  (.v)  Charta  in  publicis  archivis  ad  annum  1547.  (j)  Specialie 
Retornatus  ultimo  August!  1588,  penes  Dominum  Jacobum  Stuart  de  Burray. 


Vol.  U.  6 


1 62  APPENDIX. 

King  James  VI.  wa<!  created  Lord  Stewart  of  Doune  in  the  15  8  t  (a),  of  whom  i? 
lineally  descended  the  present  Eaa-1  of  Murray. 

Mr  Henry  Stewart,  the  second  son,  is  in  several  deeds  designed  of  Bucklivie 
and  in  others,  brother-german  to  Sir  James  Stewart  of  Doune  :  He  married  Eliza- 
beth, only  daughter  of  John  Robertson,  portioner  of  Aberdour  (/»),  by  whom  he 
had  a  son, 

Jajvies  Stewart,  who  married  the  before-mentioned  Janet  Macleod,  daughter  to 
Roderick  Macleod  of  the  Lewis,  and  Dame  Barbara  Stewart,  his  wife,  daughter  to 
the  above-named  Andrew  Lord  Evandale,  with  whom  he  got  the  estate  of  Bur- 
ray.  By  her  he  left  only  one  daughter,  Barbara  Stewart,  who  was  mar- 
ried to 

William  Stewart  of  Mains,  second  son  to  Sir  Alexander  Stewart  of  Garlics, 
and  brother-german  to  Alexander  the  first  Lord  Garlics,  and  Earl  of  Galloway,  in 
whose  favour  the  estate  of  Burray  was  confirmed  by  a  charter  under  the  Great 
Seal,  upon  the  penult  day  of  July  163 1  (c).  This  Wdliam  Stewart  of  Mains  and 
Burray  was  Admiral-Depute  of  Orkney  and  Zetland  (rf),  and  in  order  to  make  up 
a  title  to  the  estate  of  the  Lewis,  that  had  been  wrested  from  the  Macleods  by  the 
tutor  of  Kintail,  his  lady  was,  in  the  1630,  served  and  retoured  as  nearest  and 
lawful  heir  to  Torquill  Macleod  of  the  Lewis,  her  grandfather  by  the  mother  ;  but 
the  troubles  coming  on,  their  claim  was  never  prosecuted.  The  said  William  Stew- 
art of  Mains  and  Burray  had  issue  by  the  before-mentioned  Barbara  Stewart  his 
wife,  James,  his  eldest  son,  who  died  before  him,  Henry,  his  second  son,  who  was 
slain  in  the  king's  service  under  the  command  of  the  Marquis  of  Montrose,  Colo- 
nel William  Stewart  his  third  son,  and  Archibald  the  fourth  ;  he  had  also  se- 
veral daughters,  whereof  Jean,  the  eldest,  was  married  to  Sir  James  Sinclair  of 
Murkle,  knight,  ancestor  to  the  present  Earl  of  Caithness,  and  was  succeeded  by 

WiLLi^VM  Stewart  of  Mains  and  Burray,  his  third  son,  who  died  without  issue, 
and  was  succeeded  by 

Archibald  his  brother,  who  joined  the  army  commanded  by  the  Duke  of  Ha- 
milton in  the  year  1648,  for  rescuing  King  Charles  I.  out  of  the  hands  of  the  re- 
bels, where,  being  made  a  prisoner,  he  in  a  short  time  thereafter  escaped,  and 
joined  the  Marquis  of  Montrose,  to  whom  he  adhered  to  the  last ;  and  when  the 
said  noble  Marquis  of  Montrose,  by  command  of  the  usurping  powers  for  the  time, 
was  ignominiously  dragged  through  the  streets  of  Edinburgh,  the  said  Archibald 
Stewart  was  compelled  to  follow  the  cart  whereon  he  was  carried,  with  his  hands 
bound  with  chains  or  shackles,  and  cast  into  the  prison  of  Edinburgh,  where  he 
was  detained  seven  months,  and  sentenced  to  death  by  that  faction  ;  which  he  had 
undoubtedly  suffered,  if  the  prison  doors  had  not  been  accidentally  opened  upon 
the  arrival  of  the  English  usurper  :  yet  notwithstanding  of  these  misfortunes  he 
joined  King  Charles  II.'s  army  in  their  march  to  Worcester,  where  he  was  a  cap- 
tain, and  gave  a  signal  proof  of  his  valour  and  skill  of  military  affairs ;  and  these 
forces  having  been  defeated  by  the  supernumerary  troops  of  the  rebels,  he  was 
again  made  a  prisoner,  and  detained  seven  months  in  Chelsea  College,  where  he 
suffered  great  miseries  and  hardships,  until  he  got  an  opportunity  to  escape.  After 
the  Restoration  he  was  appointed  Lieutenant-Colonel  of  the  Militia  of  Orkney,  by 
commission  imder  the  Privy  Seal,  in  anno  1683  ;  and.  in  the  year  1687,  '^'^  ^'^^^ 
Majesty  King  James  VII.  being  highly  sensible  of  the  loyalty  and  sufferings  of 
the  said  Archibald  Stewart,  and  therefore,  willing  to  bestow  a  lasting  mark  of  his 
royal  favour,  conferred  the  dignity  of  a  knight-baronet  upon  him  by  letters  pa- 
tent, bearing  date  at  Whitehall  the  4th  November  1687.  He  man-ied  Isabel, 
daughter  to  Sir  V/illiam  Murray  of  Abercairny,  by  whom  he  had  Sir  Archibald 
his  heir  and  successor,  Mr  John,  who  died  without  issue,  and  three  daughters, 
Lilias,  Isabel,  and  Sophia  who  was  married  to  David  Sinclair  of  Freswick. 

Sir  Archibald  Stewart  of  Burray  man'ied  Margaret,  daughter  of  Archibald 
Stewart  of  Dunnavern,  brother-german  to  Alexander  Earl  of  Murray,  by  whom 
he  had  the  present  Sir  James  Stewart  of  Burray,  baronet,  Mr  Alexander  Stewart 
and  several  other  sons,  who  died  in  their  youth,  besides  daughters. 

(a)  Acts  and  records  of  Parliament,  (i)  Writs  of  the  family  of  Down,  mentioned  by  Mr  David 
Simpson,  (c)  Charta  penes  Dominum  Jacobum  Stuart  de  Burray.  (d)  Commission  28th  August  1619, 
Ibidem. 


APl'ENDIX.  163 

The  ai-moiial  achievement  presently  borne  by  Sir  James  Stewart  of  Burray,  as 
matriculated  in  the  Lyon  Register,  is  already  given  in  the  First  Volume  of  this 
System,  page  52,  and  engraven  on  the  Twelfth  Plate  of  the  Achievements  of  the 
Subscribers  ;  only,  by  mistake  of  the  engraver,  the  bordure  is  made  plain  instead 
of  being  indented,  as  blazoned  in  the  said  52d  page:  But  that  bearing  having 
been  assigned  to  his  grandfather  when  a  younger  brother,  and  distinguished  by  a 
suitable  mark  ot  cadency,  and  he  being  now  the  only  representative  of  the  family, 
may  lay  it  aside,  and  assume  the  principal  achievement  as  borne  by  William 
Stewart  of  Mains  his  great-grandfather,  viz.  or,  a  fesse  cheque,  azure  and  argent, 
surmounted  of  a  bend  ingrailed  betwixt  two  lions'  heads  erased,  all  within  a  double 
tressure,  flowered  and  counter-flowered  gules,  and  quartered  with  the  arms  of 
Stewart  Lord  Evandale,  with  a  suitable  brisure,  and  of  Macleod  of  the  Lewis,  as 
his  only  representative. 

Before  finishing  this  memorial,  it  will  not  be  improper  to  notice  two  mistakes 
that  have  been  committed  in  the  First  Volume  of  this  System,  probably  for  want 
of  proper  information  ;  the  first  is  in  page  52,  where,  in  place  of  Robert  Stewart 
of  Burray,  second  son  of  Mains,  it  ought  to  be  Archibald  Stewart  of  Burray, 
youngest  son  of  Mains,  as  is  evident  from  the  above  memorial.  The  other  error 
is  in  page  410,  where  it  is  asserted  that  Stewart  of  Burray  used  a  tower  embattled, 
quarterly,  as  descended  from  an  heiress  of  Macleod  of  that  Ilk  ;  whereas  none  of 
the  family  of  Burray  ever  married  an  heiress  of  Macleod  of  that  Ilk,  but  of 
Macleod  of  the  Lewis,  as  the  above  memorial  evidences,  and  is  vouched  by  char- 
ters and  many  other  original  writings  in  the  custody  of  Sir  James  Stewart  of  Bur- 
ray, too  numerous  to  be  here  mentioned.  This  would  seem  to  have  been  a  general 
mistake,  probably  occasioned  by  not  distinguishing  the  family  of  Macleod  of  that 
Ilk  from  Macleod  of  the  Lewis,  which  has  been  many  years  extinct,  and  conse- 
quently little  known  or  noticed.  This  conjecture  is  founded  on  inspection  of  the 
seal  of  Roderick  Macleod  of  the  Lewis  before  mentioned,  (who  lived  in  the  reigns  of 
King  James  V.  and  VI.  and  was  the  last  of  his  family  that  enjoyed  the  estate) 
appended  to  a  deed  of  his  in  the  custody  of  Sir  James  Stewart  of  Burray,  where 
there  is  no  such  figure  as  either  castle  or  tower  to  be  found  :  The  arms  thereon 
are  thus  blazoned,  viz.  parted  per  fesse  first,  parted  per  pale  first,  a  lion  rampant 
second,  a  dexter  hand  coupe,  paleways  ;  and  in  the  second  or  base  grand  par- 
tition, a  galley  or  lymphad.  The  tinctures  cannot  be  discovered  from  the 
seal. 


Memorial  of  the  ancient  family  of  St  CLAIR  of  Roshn. 


THE  first  of  the  surname  of  St  Clair  (according  to  Jacob  van  Bassans  Manu- 
•<cript)  was  son  to  IVo/denius  Compte  de  St  Clare,  and  his  wife,  Helena,  daughter  to 
the  Duke  of  Normandy,  and  cousin-german  to  William  the  Conqueror,  who, 
coming  to  Scotland,  obtamed  a  grant  of  the  lands  and  barony  of  RosJin,  whereof 
Malcolm  III.  King  of  Scotland,  commonly  called  Canmore,  granted  a  charter  of 
confirmation  (,7),  in  favour  of  William  St  Clair,  who  was  steward  to  Qiieen  Mar- 
garet, and  married  Agnes  Dunbar,  daughter  to  Patrick  Dunbar  the  first  Earl  of 
March ;  and  the  aforesaid  barony  of  Roslin  was  afterwards  confirmed  (/;)  by  Wil- 
liam the  Lion  King  of  Scotland,  JVillielmo  de  Snncto  Claro,  in  or  about  the  ii8o. 
His  son,  Henry  St  Clair  Baron,  of  Roslin,  married  Katharine,  daughter  to  the  Earl 
of  Strathern,  by  whom  he  had  Henry  St  Clair,  who  succeeded  him  in  the  estate  of 
Roslin,  and  married  Margaret  Marr,  daughter  to  the  Earl  of  Rlarr.  Their  son, 
IViUielmus  de  Sancto  Claro,  domiiius  de  Roslin,  married  Lucia,  daughter  to  the  Earl 
of  Strathern,  and  Matilda,  only  daughter  and  heiress  to  Magnus  Earl  of  Orkney 
and  Zetland.  He  executed  the  office  of  high  sheriff  of  the  shire  of  Edinbugh  in 
the  3Cth  year  of  Alexander  III.  anno  1278  {c^;  and  in  a  charter  granted  by  John 

(a)  Charta  confirmationis  penes  Gulielmum  Sinclair  de  Roslin.     {V)  Alia  chaita 
eundem.       (c)  Chartulary  of  Dunfermline,  MSS.  in  the  Lawyers'  Library. 


iC<4  APPENDIX. 

de  Strathern,  to  which  he  is  witness,  he  is  accordingly  designed  Domimis  de  Saiictc 
Chro,  Vicecomes  de  Edinburgh.  He  was  succeeded  by  his  son  Sir  Henry  St  Clair 
of  Roslin,  who  made  a  very  illustrious  figure  in  the  war  occasioned  by  the  com- 
petition for  the  crown  betwixt  the  Bruce  and  Baliol;  and  being  a  faithful  adherent 
to  the  former,  King  Robert,  in  the  nth  year  of  his  reign  (rf),  erected  the  muir  of 
Pentland  and  several  other  lands  into  a  free  hunting,  as  they  were  in  the  reign  of 
King  Alexander,  for  payment  of  a  tenth  part  of  a  soldier.  This  Sir  Henry  St 
Clair  married  Florentia,  daughter  to  the  King  of  Denmark,  with  whom  he  got  a 
great  estate  in  Norway,  and,  after  the  forfeiture  of  his  grandfather  of  the  earldom 
of  Strathern,  he,  in  right  of  his  mother,  got  the  earldom  of  Orkney  and  Zetland, 
which  he  held  of  the  King  of  Denmark.  After  the  death  of  King  Robert  Bruce 
he  accompanied  the  Douglas  with  his  heart  to  the  Holy  Land,  and  in  his  way  the 
Emperor  created  him  a  Knight  of  the  Order  of  the  Golden  Fleece.  His  son.  Sir 
Henry  St  Clair  of  Roshn,  was  created  Earl  of  Orkney  by  Haco  King  of  Norway, 
in  the  1379  (f),  and  was  at  the  same  time  invested  in  the  same  honour  by  his  own 
natural  sovereign  Kmg  Robert  II.  as  appears  by  a  charter  in  the  rolls,  granted  by 
that  prince,  "  dilecto  consanguineo  suo  Henrico  Comiti  Orcadis  domino  de  Ros- 
"  lin,  baroniffi  de  Roslin,"  proceeding  upon  his  own  resignation  thereof.  He  was 
likewise  Lord  of  Zetland,  and  was  created  Duke  of  Oldenburgh  in  Denmark  by 
Christian,  the  first  of  that  name.  King  of  Denmark.  He  was  also  created  a 
Knight  of  the  Orders  of  the  Thistle,  the  Cockle,  and  Golden  Fleece,  by  tlie  dif- 
ferent sovereigns  of  these  several  orders.  He  married  Egidia  Douglas,  daughter  to 
William  Lord  Nithsdale,  and  the  fair  Egidia,  daughter  to  King  Robert  II.  and  had 
by  her  one  son,  William,  who  succeeded  him,  and  three  daughters;  Elizabeth,  the 
elde'it,  was  married  to  Sir  John  Drummond  of  Stobhall,  ancestor  to  the  Duke  of 
Perth,  as  appears  by  a  deed  in  the  charter-chest  of  that  family,  whereby  Sir  John 
and  his  lady,  Elizabeth  St  Clair,  disclaim  any  right  they  could  pretend  to  the  lands 
lying  within  the  kingdom  of  Norway,  belonging  to  her  father  Henry  Earl  of 
Orkney.  The  second  daughter,  Helen,  was  married  to  John  Stewart  Earl  of  Athol, 
and  the  third,  Beatrix,  to  John  Douglas  Lord  Aberdeen.  This  Henry  Earl  of 
Orkney  went  governor  with  James  I.  then  prince,  for  France;  but  they  were  both 
taken  prisoners  by  the  English  in  their  way  thither.  He  was  succeeded  by  his 
son  William  Earl  of  Orkney  and  Caithness,  who  was  the  greatest  subject  by  far  of 
all  others  in  his  time,  being  designed  by  the  following  lofty  titles,  WiUielmus  de 
Sancto  Claro,  Duke  of  Oldenburgh,  Earl  of  Orkney  and  Caithness,  Lord  Zetland, 
St  Clair  and  Nithsdale,  with  the  vallies  of  Nith  and  town  of  Dumfries,  and  Sherifi 
thereof.  Great  Admiral  of  Scotland,  Warden  of  the  Marches,  and  Justice-General, 
Knight  of  the  Golden  Fleece,  Baron  of  Eckford,  Greenlaw,  and  Kilkbellan,  Rox- 
burgh, Caverton,  Cousland,  Roslin,  Pentland,  Herbertshire,  Carden,  St  Clair,  Po- 
mers,  Dysart,  and  Newburgh  in  Buchan.  He  married  Elizabeth  Douglas,  daugh- 
ter to  Archibald  Earl  of  Douglas,  and,  after  her  death,  Marjory,  daughter  to  Alex- 
ander, Master  of  Sutherland.  The  said  William  Earl  of  Orkney  and  Caithness  was 
likewise  High  Chancellor  of  Scotland,  and  executed  that  great  office  from  the 
1455  till  the  1458.  He  exchanged  with  King  James  III.  the  lordship  of  Nithsdale 
for  the  earldom  of  Caithness,  then  fallen  to  the  crown  by  the  demise  of  Sir  George 
Crichton;  and  in  the  1471  he  resigned  to  the  crown  the  earldom  of  Orkney, 
which  was  thereupon  annexed  to  the  crown  (/);  though  it  is  plain  he  retained 
even  after  that  the  title  of  Comes  Orcadiae  as  well  as  that  of  Comes  Cathaniae. 
This  noble  person  founded  and  erected  a  collegiate  church  near  his  own  castle  of 
Roslin,  in  the  year  1441,  which  he  nobly  endowed  with  suitable  revenues  for  a 
provost  and  seven  prebends  for  performing  divine  service  according  to  the  custom 
of  these  times.  This  collegiate  church  is  a  noble  and  magnificent  structure  of 
Gothic  architecture,  enriched  both  within  and  without  with  great  variety  of  orna- 
ments suitable  to  that  order,  and  beautified  in  several  places  with  histories,  em- 
blems and  other  figures,  curiously  represented  in  bas-relief,  which  yet  discover 
that  they  have  been  handsomely  gilded  and  painted.  The  fabric  in  general  has 
always  been  looked  upon  as  a  master-piece  in  its  kind,  and  is  still  esteemed  as  such 

((/)  Charta  penes  Gulielmum  St  Clare  de  Roslin.     (<r)  Torpheus'  History  of  Orkney.      (_/")  Had- 
dington's Collections  from  the  Records. 


APPENDIX,  165 

by  very  good  judges  of  architecture,  and  upon  that  account  is  frequently  resorted, 
to  by  the  curious,  as  well  natives  as  tbreignexs,  who  view  it  with  pleasure  and  sa- 
tisfaction. 

This  William  Earl  of  Orkney  and  Caithness,  for  reasons  not  to  be  discovered  at 
this  distance  of  time,  thought  frt  to  pass  by  Sir  WiUiain  St  Clair,  his  eldest,  son  in 
the  succession  to  the  gross  of  his  estate,  and  gave  iiini  only  the  barony  of  New- 
burgh  in  Aberdeenshire j  from  which  Sir  William  the  Lord  Sinclair's  family  is 
lineally  descended  by  an  heir-female.  Betwixt  the  two  sons  of  his  second  wife, 
Marjory,  daughter  to  Alexander,  Master  of  Sutherland,  he  divided  his  great  estate: 
To  Sir  Oliver  St  Clair,  his  eldest  son  of  that  marriage,  he  disponed  the  baronies  of 
Roslin,  Pentland  and  Pentland-muir,  the  barony  of  Herbertshire  in  Stirlingshire, 
the  lands  of  Cousland,  the  barony  of  Ravenscraig,  Dubbs,  Carberry,  Dysart,  &c. 
being  the  whole  of  the  Earl's  estate  be-south  Tay.  This  deed  is  confirmed  by  a 
charter  under  the  Great  Seal  of  King  James  111.  the  loth  of  September  in  anno 
1476,  still  extant  in  the  rolls.  To  William  St  Clair,  his  second  son  of  the  foresaid 
marriage,  the  said  earl  disponed  the  earldom  of  Caithness,  and  from  hun  the  pre- 
sent Earl  of  Caithness  is  lineally  descended,  in  a  direct  masculine  course  of  suc- 
cession. 

This  Sir  Oliver  St  Clair  of  Roslin  married  Margaret,  daughter  of  William  Lord 
Borthwick,  by  whom  he  had  Sir  William  his  heir  and  successor. 

Dr  Henry  St  Clair,  who  was  bred  to  the  church,  and  taking  orders,  was  soon 
thereafter  made  Dean  of  Glasgow,  which,  with  consent  of  the  crown,  he  exchanged 
with  Gavin  Hamilton  for  the  Abbey  of  Kilwinning ;  he  was  afterwards  promoted 
to  the  Episcopal  See  of  Ross,  and  was  President  of  the  College  of  Justice ;  which 
office  he  held  till  his  death  in  the  year  1565. 

Sir  Oliver  St  Clair,  the  third  son,  was  stiled  of  Whitekirk  and  Pitcairn*.  This 
was  the  gentleman  that  King  James  V.  held  in  so  great  esteem  for  his  skill  in 
military  affairs,  that  he  pitched  on  him  to  command  the  Scot's  army  at  the  battle 
of  Solway,  anno  1542;  which,  without  reason,  gave  so  great  disgust,  that,  how- 
ever just  the  choice  might  be,  the  army  behaved  very  ill  on  that  occasion,  and  was 
thought  by  some  to  hasten  on  the  king's  death.  His  lineal  heir-female  was  married 
to  Captain  William  Ramsay,  and  was  mother  by  him  to  William,  the  present  Earl 
of  Dalhousie. 

Dr  John  St  Clmr,  the  fourth  son,  was  bred  also  to  the  church;  he  was  Dean  of 
Restalrig,  and  afterwards  promoted  to  the  Bishoprick  of  Brechin.  He  was  a 
learned  man,  both  in  the  civrl  and  canon  law,  and  was  made  President  of  the 
Session  after  the  demise  of  his  brother  the  Bishop  of  Ross;  in  which  state  he  con- 
tinued till  his  death  anno  1567. 

The  above-mentioned  Sir  Wilham  St  Clair  of  Roslin  was  in  a  high  degree  of 
favour  with  King  James  V.  who,  by  his  special  writ  of  summons,  called  him  fre- 
quently to  sit  in  Parliament,  as  appears  from  the  Registers  of  Parliament.  He 
married  Elizabeth  Home,  of  the  Lord  Home's  family  (^),  by  whom  he  had  Sir 
AVilliam  St  Clair  of  Roslin,  who  was  Justice-General  of  Scotland  in  the  reign  of 
(iKieen  Mary.  He  married  Isabel  Ker,  daughter  of  Sir  Walter  Ker  ot  Cessford, 
ancestor  to  the  Duke  of  Roxburgh,  by  whom  he  had  Edward  St  Clair  of  Roslin, 
his  eldest  son,  who  married  Elizi'.beth,  daughter  of  Sir  George  Douglas  of  Parkhead, 
but  had  no  male  succession.     And 

Sir  William,  his  second  son,  who  married  Janet,  daughter  to Edmon- 

stone  of  that  Ilk,  and  had  by  her  Sir  William  his  son  and  heir,  who  married  Anne, 
daughter  of  Dr  John  Spottisw'ood,  Archbishop  of  St  Andrews,  and  Lord  High 
CI  ancellor  of  Scotland  in  the  reign  of  King  Charles  I.  and  had  by  her  James  St 
Clair  of  Roslin,  who  married  Jean,  daughter  of  Sir  Henry  Spottiswood,  High  She- 
rift"  of  Dubhn,  by  whom  he  had  Alexander  St  Clair  of  Roslin,  who  married  Jean,' 
daughter  of  Robert  Lord  Semple,  and  had  by  her  William  St  Clair,  now  of  Roslin, 
his  son  and  heir,  and  heir-male  to  the  above-mentioned  William  Earl  of  Orkney 
and  Caithness,  who  was  Chancellor  in  the  reign  of  King  James  111. 

(^)  Charter  under  the  Great  Seal  15^6- 

A'oL.  XL  6G 


1 66  APPENDIX. 

The  said  William  St  Clair  of  Roslin,  Esq.  bears,  for  his  armorial  achievemein, 
argent,  a  cross  ingrailed  sable,  supported  oa  the  dexter  by  a  mermaid,  holding  in 
her  right  hand  a  trident,  with  the  point  upwards,  and  on  the  sinister  by  a  griffin ; 
for  crest,  a  dove  holding  an-olive  branch  in  its  beak,  all  proper;  and,  for  his  motto, 
the  word  Credo. 


CAMPBELL  of  Sherrington. 


THIS  family  lies  in  the  shire  of  Ayr,  in  the  southmost  parts  of  the  middle  di- 
vision thereof,  called  Kyle,  where  the  name  of  Campbell  were  very  early  pro- 
prietors, as  appears  from  a  gift  by  Sir  Colin  Campbell,  son  to  Gillescop  Campbell 
of  twenty  merks  out  of  his  lands  of  Symington  in  Kyle  to  the  abbacy  of  New- 
bottle,  anno  1290,  recorded  in  the  Chartulary  Books  of  Newbottle  in  the  Advo- 
cates' Library. 

The  original  writs  of  the  family  are  either  lost,  or,  through  age  and  bad  keeping, 
cannot  be  read. 

The  earliest  legible  instruction  is  in  the  year  1348;  there  appears  to  have  been 
a  resignation  or  surrender  of  the  lands  and  estate  of  Skerrington,  for  infeftment  to 
David  Campbell  of  Skerrington. 

David  Campbell  was  succeeded  by  his  son  Andrew  Campbell,  as  appears  by  a 
deed  made  by  the  Baron  of  Cumnock  in  favour  of  Andrew  Campbell  of  Skerring- 
ion,  son  to  umquhile  David  Campbell,  amio  1360. 

To  Andrew  succeeded  David  Campbell,  the  second  of  that  name,  as  appears  by 
a  charter  granted  by  him  to  his  son,  anno  1460,  running  in  thir  terms:  "  Omnibus 
"  banc  chartam,  &.c.  David  Campbell  Dominus  de  Skerringtone  salutem  in  do- 
"  mino  sempiternam,"  &c.  He  is  said  to  be  married  to  a  sister  of  Stewart  of 
Haining. 

David  Campbell  is  succeeded  by  his  son  Andrew  Campbell  of  Skerrington,  the 
second  of  that  name,  as  appears  by  the  foresaid  charter,  and  by  another  charter 
granted  him  by  Hodgison  of  Barshare  of  the  lands  of  Craigens,  anno  1490,  run- 
ning in  thir  terms:  "  Omnibus,  b-c.  Joannes  Hodgison  de  Barshare,  &.c.  no- 
"  veritis  me  titulo  venditionis  alienasse  honorabili  viro  Andreac  Campbell  de 
"  Skerringtone,"  &c.  And  by  several  other  charters,  granted  him  before  this 
time,  he  is  said  to  be  married  to Boyd,  daughter  of  the  family  of  Kil- 
marnock. 

To  Andrew  Campbell  succeeded  Alexander  Campbell  of  Skerrington,  as  ap- 
pears from  his  charter  of  the  estate,  anno  1509,  and  other  charters  granted  to  him 
about  that  time;  he  was  married  to  his  cousin  Mrs  Campbell,  sister  to  Campbell 
of  Cessnock. 

Alexander  Campbell  was  succeeded  in  an  opulent  estate  by  his  son  Andrew 
Campbell  of  Skerrington,  the  third  of  that  name,  as  appears  from  many  charters 
from  the  year  1534,  forward,  that  were  granted  him  in  thir  terms:  "  Honorabili 
"  viro  Andreae  Campbell  de  Skerringtone  ;"'  he  had  at  that  time  the  barony  of  Bar- 
gour,  with  many  other  lands,  and  left  no  issue. 

Charles  Campbkll,  cousin  to  Sir  George  Campbell  of  Loudon,  and  nephew  and 
lieir  to  Andrew  Campbell  of  Skerrington,  succeeded  him  about  the  year  1560  or 
1570  ;  he  designed  himself  first  of  Skerrington  and  then  of  Horsecleugh,  where 
lie  afterwards  dwelt,  as  appears  from  his  charters  and  writs  about  that  time,  where 
he  is  designed  Dominus  de  Skerringtohe,  and  thereafter  his  writs  run  in  thir  terms  : 
"  Honorabili  viro  Carolo  Campbell  de  Horsecleugh,  Stc."  Through  mistake  he  is 
called  in  some  parts  of  Knox's  History  of  the  Reformation,  to  which  he  was  very 
assistant,  William  instead  of  Charles  :  He  was  married  to  Mrs  Campbell,  daughter 
to  Campbell  of  Shankston,  a  baron  descended  of  the  family  of  Loudon. 

Charles  Campbell  was  succeeded  by  his  son  George  Campbell  of  Horsecleugh 
about  the  year  1590  or  1600,  who  had  to  his  brother  Mr  William  Campbell,  grand- 


•  APPENDIX.  167 

father  to  James  Campbell  of  Little  Cesnock,  who  died  without  issue,  whereby  his 
estate  returned  thereafter  to  the  family,  aimo  i-]2J.  George  Campbell  was  mar- 
ried to  Mrs  Mary  Gordon  of  the  family  of  the  Lord  Viscount  of  Kenmure ;  he  spent 
almost  all  his  estate,  and  left  to  succeed  him  his  eldest  soiv 

John  Campbell  of  Horsecleugh,  who  succeeded  about  the  year  1640,  and  was  in- 
feft  under  the  Great  Seal  in  the  reniains  of  his  estate  of  Skerriugton  and  Horse- 
cleugh, iinno  1644;  after  a  marriage  with  a  daughter  of  Gordon  of  Skirmer's  he 
was  married  to  Jean  Nicol  or  Nicolson,  daughter  of  Mr  Thomas  Nicolson,  merch- 
ant in  Ayr. 

John  Campbell  of  Horsecleugh  was.  succeeded  by  John  Campbell  his  eldest  son, 
the  second  of  that  name,  about  the  year  1700,  who  spent  the  most  part  of  his  life 
in  the  army  ;  he  was  first  married  to  Mrs  Jean  BoswcU,  eldest  sister  to  Mr  James 
Boswell  of  Auchinleck,  advocate,  and  after  her  death  without  issue,  to  Abigail 
Ranken,  daughter  and  heiress  to  Mr  Widiam  Ranken  of  Bankhead,  and  heiress  of 
line  to  her  great  grandfather,  Laurence  Ranken,  Laird  of  Shiel,  as  he  is  designed 
in  Knox's  History  of  the  Reformation,  who  was  chief  of  the  name,  and  by  her 
mother  she  is  likewise  heiress  of  line  to  Robert  Cathcart  of  Drumjoan,  an  ancient 
family  of  that  name.  John  Campbell  of  Horsecleugh  aforesaid,  died  the  28th  of 
July  1725,  having  by  her  of  male  heirs  John  and  James  Campbells. 

He  is  succeeded  by  Mr  John  Campbell  of  Skerrington,  advocate,  his  eldest  son» 
who  assumed  the  title  of  his  predecessors. 


An  Historical  and  Genealogical  Essay  on  the  Illustrious  Fatnily  of  the  Earls,  Mar- 
quisses,  and  Dukes  of  ATHOL,  from  its  first  erection  into  a  Feudal  Dignity  in  the 
Reign  of  King  David  L  to  the  present  time. 


AS  this  is  undoubtedly  one  of  the  most  ancient  dignities  among  us,  so  it  has 
been  successively  enjoyed  by  many  royal,  noble,  and  illustrious  persons,  who  have 
been  eminent  for  their  birth,  quality,  and  merit,  in  their  several  ages  :  so  that 
I  may  venture  to  say,  that  the  honorary  title  of  Athol  has  been  borne  by  more 
royal  branches  and  sons  of  the  crown,  from  time  to  time,  than  any  other  title  or 
dignity  in  Scotland  whatsoever,  as  will  appear  from  the  sequel  of  this  narration, 
from  which  I  shall  detain  the  reader  no  longer,  but  proceed  directly  to  give  the 
deduction  of  the  several  dignitaries  in  a  clear  and  distinct  chronology  from  the 
aera  we  have  fixed  on  till  his  grace  the  present  Duke  of  Athol. 

The  first  illustrious  person  who  enjoyed  this  honour  of  Earl  of  Athol  was  Mal- 
colm, son  to  King  Donald  VU.  surnamed  Bane,  brother  to  King  Malcolm  Can- 
more,  who  was  by  King  David  created  Earl  of  Athol  {a).  Torfieus  the  Danish 
Historigrapher,  speaking  of  this  Earl  of  Athol  {b),  says  he  was  the  noblest  prince  of 
Scotland  :  "  Omnium  Scotia;  principum  facile  nobilissimus  patruelisquippe  Davidi< 
"  regis  Scotis  in  pnesens  regnantis."  This  same  Malcolmus  Comes  is  a  witness  and 
a  consenter  to  the  charter  of  foundation  of  the  monastery  of  Scoon,  by  King  Alex- 
ander I.  amio  1 115  (f ).  He  married  Margaret,  daughter  of  Haco  Earl  of  Orkney  (^/), 
by  whom  he  had  a  son,  his  heir, 

Malcolm  Earl  of  Athol,  who  was  a  donator  to  the  Abbey  of  Scoon  ;  for,  by  In- 
deed and  grant,  he  made  over  to  the  abbot  and  convent  perpetually  the  church  of 
Login  Muchbed,  with  four  chapels  thereunto  belonging,  for  the  safety  of  his  soul, 
&c.  (t-).     He  was  also  a  benefactor  to  the  monks  of  Dunfermline;  for  to  that 

(a)  Buchanan  and  our  other  historians,  (i)  In  his  History  of  the  Earls  of  Orkney  in  the  Advocates' 
Library  at  Edinburgh,  cap.  22.  page  100.  (c)  Chartulary  of  Scoon,  which  I  had  from  the  late  Vis- 
count of  Storraont.     (</)  Torpheus,  page  100.     (e)  Chartulary  of  Scoon. 


ib8  APPENDIX. 

convent  he  gave  in  pure  and  perpetual  alms  the  patronage  and  tithes  of  the  church 
of  Moulin,  "  pro  salute  animae  suae,  et  anima  sponsae  suae  et  pro  animabus  regum 
"  Scotice,  predecessorum  suorum,  ibidem  requiescentium  ;"  and  that  when  it  shall 
please  Almighty  God  to  call  him  and  the  countess  his  v/it'e  to  his  mercy,  that  they 
shall  be  interred  in  the  abbey  church  there  (/)..  To  this  deed  King  William  and 
the  Bishops  of  Gla'^go\v,  Aberdeen,  Dunkeld,  and  Brechin,  are  witnesses.  To 
Malcolm  Earl  of  Athol  succeeded  his  son 

Henry  Earl  of  Athol,  who  ratifies  and  confirms  to  the  abbot  aad  convent  of 
Dunfermline  the  grants  his  father  had  made  to  them  for  the  health  and  welfare  of 
himself  and  relations,  whether  dead  or  ahve  (j^).  He  died  without  issue-male,  and 
the  feudal  honour  returned  to  the  crown,  and  being  in  the  king's  disposal,  Alex- 
ander U.  gave  the  earldom,  and  the  title  of  Earl  of  Athol  to  Allanus  de  Lundoniit 
Ostiarius  Regis,  who  was  then  in  great  favour  and  confidence.  This  is  vouch- 
ed and  instructed  by  a  deed  of  Allanus  Ostiarius  Regis  Comes  Atbole,  whereby  he 
gives  to  them  the  monastery  of  Arbroath,  the  wood  and  forrest  of  Orphack  in 
Aberdeenshire,  which  had  been  formerly  given  by  Thomas  de  Lundin  Ostiarius 
Regis,  pater  suus,  to  that  convent.  This  donation  is  ratified  by  King  Alexander  II. 
the  1 2th  of  October,  the  19th  year  of  his  reign,  that  is  the  year  of  our  Lord 
1230  (/^).  I  conjecture  that  this  Allan  Hostiarius  has  married  the  eldest  daughter 
of  Henry  Earl  of  Athol,  and  upon  that  has  been  invested  in  the  honour  of  Earl  of 
Athol  by  cincture  of  the  sword  and  the  other  usual  ceremonies  of  creation  ;  but 
that  his  wife  dying  soon  after  the  marriage  without  any  issue,  he  resigned  the 
dignity  back  to  the  crown,  in  order  that  it  might  be  established  upon  a  gentleman 
of  great  rank  and  quality,  who,  we  are  certain,  from  unquestionable  vouchers, 
married  the  Lady  Isabel,  another  of  the  daughters  of  Henry  Earl  of  Athol,  and 
that  was  Thomas  of  Galloway,  son  of  Uchtred,  and  brother  of  Allan  Lord  of  Gal- 
loway, who  was  also  honoured  with  the  title  and  dignity  of  Earl  of  Athol ;  for  in  the 
chartulary  of  the  abbacy  of  Dunfermline  we  find  Thomas  de  Golouyea  comes  Atholie, 
et  Lobelia  comitissa  Atholie  sponsa  sua,  giving  and  confirming  deeds  to  that 
convent.  This  Thomas  Earl  of  Athol  died  in  the  1234  (?),  and  left  a  son  his 
heir. 

Patrick  Earl  of  Athol,  who  was  burnt  in  his  own  lodging  in  the  town  of  Had- 
dington, by  the  instigation  of  Sir  John  Bisset,  as  was  shrewdly  suspected,  (^k),  in 
the  year  1241  ;  so  he  dying  without  successors,  the  dignity  of  Earl  of  Athol  came 
to  Sir  David  Hastings,  an  English  gentleman  who  had  married  the  Lady  Ferehthe, 
another  daughter  of  Henry  Earl  of  Athol,  and  aunt,  by  the  mother,  to  Patrick  the 
young  Earl  of  Athol  (/),  and  thereupon  has  been  invested  in  the  honour  of  Earl  of 
Athol,  and  we  find  him  so  designed  in  certain  vouchers  («)  ;  and  there  is  an  ori- 
ginal charter  in  the  Advocates'  Library  at  Edinburgh,  granted  by  Ferehthe  Comi- 
tissa Athole,  by  which  she  gives  in  pure  and  perpetual  alms  to  the  monks  of  the 
abbey  of  Cupar  in  Angus,  the  lands  of  "  Dunfuther  pro  salute  anima;  su;i%  et  pro 
"  anima  domini  David  de  Hastings,  quondam  viri  mei  comitis  Atholie."  He  died 
in  a  pilgrimage  to  the  Holy  Land,  anno  1269  («),  leaving  one  daughter  his  sole 
heir,  Adda,  who  was  married  to  John  de  Strahbolgy,  wiio  was  upon  that  invested 
in  the  honour  of  the  Earl  of  Athol  by  King  Alexander  III.  (0). 

The  Earls  of  Athol,  of  the  surname  of  Strathbogy  were  a  branch  of  the  great 
family  of  the  Earls  of  Fife  :  David,  a  younger  son  of  Malcolm  Earl  of  Fife,  who 
was  great  Justiciary  of  Scotland  under  King  William,  had,  by  a  grant  of  the 
crown,  the  lands  of  Strathbogy,  and  from  thence,  as  the  custom  then  was,  he  as- 
sumed a  surname.  In  the  chartulary  of  the  Episcopal  See  of  Murray  (/>),  there  is 
an  agreement  in  the  1226,  between  Andrew,  then  bishop  of  Murray,  and  David, 
son  of  Duncan,  umquhile  Earl  of  Fife,  whereby  the  bishop  cedes  his  right  to  the 
patronages  of  several  churches  to  him,  and  in  lieu  thereof  he  grants  to  the  other, 
"  predicto  episcopo,  et  suis  successoribus  advocationem  omnium  aliarum  eccle- 

{f)  Chartulary  of  the  Abbey  of  Dunfermline  in  the  Lawyers'  Library  at  Edinburgh,  (g)  Ibidem. 
(A)  Chartulary  of  Arbroath  in  the  noble  library  of  the  noble  family  of  Panmure.  (i)  Excerpts  from 
Fordun.  (^h}  Buchanan.  ("/)  Fordun,  speaking  of  the  death  of  Patrick  Earl  of  Athol,  says,  his  estate 
<-ame  to  his  aunt  matertera  defuncti.  {m)  Rymer's  Fcedera,  ("«)  Fordun.  (0)  Balfour's  Collections, 
title  Athol  in  Bibloth.  juridica.    ("/_)  Ibidem. 


APPENDIX.  109 

"  siarum  m  feudo  suo  dc  Struthbolgy,  et  terris  ad  easdem  ecclesias  pertinentium." 
This  David  dc  Sirathbolgy  had  a  son,  John  de  Strathbolgy,  who  having  married 
Adda,  the  daughter  and  heir  of  David  Earl  at"  Athol,  as  is  heretofore  observed, 
was  cinctiiJ  gladio  Comitatus  ^-Jtholie.  He,  as  Earl  of  Athol,  and  Adda  Countess  of 
Athol,  his  wife,  confirm  a  deed  of  the  lands  of  Inmeth  to  the  monks  of  Cupar, 
"  quas  David  Comes  Atholie  pater  Addae  Comitiss*  Athole"  had  formerly  given 
to  that  monastery,  and  they  then  jointly  ratify  and  confirm  the  deed  in  the 
1284  («).  He  was  succeeded  by  David  de  Stratbbolgy  Earl  of  Athol,  his  son,  who 
married  an  English  lady,  Isabel,  daughter  and  co-heir  of  Richard  de  Chilum,  a 
great  fortune  in  England  ;  and  dying  in  the  1284  (Zi),  was  succeeded  by  John  de 
Stratbbolgy  Earl  of  Athol,  his  son  (c),  who  was  amongst  the  earliest  of  those  patriots 
who  resorted  to  King  Robert  Bruce  when  he  first  exerted  the  regal  power  in  1306,  and 
was  at  the  battle  of  iVIethven.  After  that  he  retired  with  the  queen  to  the  castle 
of  Kildrummy,  which  being  some  time  after  taken  by  a  detachment  of  the  Eng- 
lish army,  with  the  Prince  of  Wales  at  their  head,  he  was  made  prisoner  with  two 
of  the  king's  brothers  ;  they  were  carried  up  to  England,  and  indicted  of  high 
treason  against  King  Edward  I.  of  England,  on  pretence  that  they  had  sworn 
allegiance  to  him  as  Direct  and  Superior  Lord  of  Scotland,  and  being  found  guilty, 
they  were  condemned,  and  suffered  accordingly  at  Westminster,  anno  1308  (rf). 
He  left  behind  him  a  son,  David  de  Strathbolgy  Earl  of  Athol  {e),  who,  for  the 
merit  and  memory  of  his  illustrious  father,  was  taken  into  a  great  degree  of  favour 
with  King  Robert  I.  and  was  made  High  Constable  of  Scotland.  This  is  clear, 
and  vouched  from  a  charter  granted  by  that  prince  to  the  convent  of  Aberbroth- 
ock,  whereby  he  erects  the  lands  of  Tarves  into  a  free  regality  ;  the  charter  bears 
date  the  26th  of  February  131 1  (/)  :  Upon  this  I  see  that  King  Edward  recalled 
a  grant  he  had  made  him  of  the  lands  of  Suraerton,  because  he  then  adhered 
to  his  enemy  Robert  Bruce,  as  he  calls  our  glorious  and  immortal  deliverer 
King  Robert  I.  But  this  earl  having  a  considerable  estate  in  England,  gave  him 
an  attachment  to  that  kingdom,  so  he  revolted  from  his  allegiance  to  his  native 
sovereign,  and  went  into  England,  where  he  had  grants  of  lands,  manors,  and  pen- 
sions, to  a  considerable  value  (^).  King  Robert  was  loath  to  use  him  with  rigour, 
being  in  hopes  he  might  reclaim  him  to  his  duty,  for  it  was  full  five  years  before 
he  disposed  of  tiie  constabulary  to  SirGilbertHay,  and  more  before  everhe  gave  any 
grant  out  of  his  estate  to  any  of  his  friends  whatsoever  Qj)  :  And  it  is  observable 
that  King  Robert  had  such  a  tenderness  towards  the  Earl  of  Athol,  that  he  did 
not  give  away  his  estate,  till  after  the  peace  with  England  was  concluded  at  Nor- 
thampton, in  the  year  1327  (/),  whereby  it  was  provided  by  an  article  of  the 
treaty,  that  no  Englishman  should  henceforth  possess  any  lands,  titles,  or  estate, 
out  such  as  would  reside  in  that  kingdom,  and  renounce  their  allegiance  to  the 
crown  of  England,  by  which  all  the  Scots  who  adhered  obstinately  to  the  English 
interest  were  forever  exiled,  and  among  others  this  David  de  Strathbolgy  Earl  of 
Athol.  This,  doubtless,  heightened  his  resentment  against  Scotland,  so  that  in  the 
minority  of  King  David  Bruce  he  commanded  a  body  of  English  troops,  in  support 
of  Edward  Baliol's  claim  and  title  to  the  crown,  and  in  that  service  he  was  slain 
at  the  battle  of  Kilblane,  in  1335  {k).  He  left  issue  by  Jean  his  wife,  eldest  sister 
and  co-heir  to  John  Cuming  of  Badenoch  (/),  David  his  son  and  heir,  who  being 
outed  and  deprived  of  his  estate  here,  was  summoned  to  Parliament  as  an  English 
baron,  and  used  the  stile  and  title  in  England  as  Earl  of  Athol ;  his  male  issue 
failed,  and  his  two  daughters  were  heirs  to  his  English  estate:  Elizabeth,  the 
elder,  was  married  to  Sir  Thomas  Percy,  knight,   son  to  Henry  Lord  Percy,  and 

(  fl  )  Coll.  Title  Athol,  by  Sir  James  Balfour  of  Kinnaiid,  Lord  Lyon  King  at  Arms,  in  Bib.  Jurid. 
(4)  Rymer  litera  excusatoria  pro  Alexr.  Balielo  ab  Alexr.  rege  Scotis.  (r)  Dugdale's  Baronage  of 
England.  {d)  History  of  Scotland.  (e)  Duijdale's  Baronage  of  England.  ( /")  Register  of  the 
Abbacy  of  Aberbrothock,  in  Bib.  Panmure.  Q)  Rymer's  Foedera  Ang.  {h)  The  Ch'arter  of  the 
Constabulary  of  Scotland  to  Sir  Gilbert  Hay  is  dated  the  i  2th  of  November  1316,  as  from  the  original 
I  have  seen,  and  have  a  copperplate  of  it.  (;')  Rymer's  Fuidera  Anglife,  ad  annum  1327.  (^)  His- 
tories of  Scotland,  and  Rymer's  Foedera,  where  John  of  the  Isles  gets  a  gift  of  a  part  of  the  ward  of 
David  his  son  from  the  King  of  England.     (/)  Dugdale's  Baronage  of  England. 

Vol.  n.  ?  D 


I7Q  APPENDIX. 

Philippa,  the  younger,  to  Sir  Ralph  Percy,  a  younger  son  of  the  same  Henry  Lord 
Percy  {a). 

David  Earl  of  Athol  having  refused  to  renounce  his  allegiance  to  England 
in  the  1327,  as  is  already  observed  in  these  memoirs,  King  Robert  did  then  be- 
stow the  earldom  of  Athol  upon  a  nephew  of  his  own,  Sir  John  Campbell  of 
Moulin. 


JOHN  CAMPBELL  Earl  of  Athol, 

Was  the  son  of  Sir  Neil  Campbell  of  Lochow,  by  the  Lady  Mary  Bruce  his- 
wife,  daughter  of  Robert  Earl  of  Carrick,  and  sister  to  King  Robert  L  (6)  ;  and- 
being  a  gentleman  of  virtue  and  merit,  was,  by  the  King  his  uncle,  rewarded  with 
the  earldom  of  Athol,  upon  the  exile  of  David  de  Strathbolgy,  the  former  Earl  of 
Athol,  as  hath  been  said.  The  erection  charter  is  not  extant  in  the  public 
archives,  but  there  are  two  authentic  deeds  of  his  as  Eai-1  of  Athol,  which  I  shall 
here  insert.  The  first  is  a  charter  granted  by  King  David  IL  "  Roberto  de  Ersken 
"  militi  domino  ejusdem,"  of  an  annuity  out  of  the  borough  mails  of  Dundee,  to- 
gether with  the  lands  of  Pitcarach,  then  in  the  crown,  by  the  demise  of  John 
Campbell  Earl  of  Athol  (c).  The  other  deed  is  a  charter  granted  by  "  Johannis 
"  Campbell  comes  de  Athole  domino  Rogero  de  Mortuo  mari  terrarum  de  Bil- 
"  landre,  &.c."  and  this  charter  is  confirmed  and  ratilied  by  another  charter  un- 
der the  Great  Seal  of  King  David  IL  (rf).  But  the  grant  of  the  earldom  of 
Athol  most  certainly  has  been  limited  to  the  heirs-male  of  his  body,  since  upon 
his  death  we  see  it  fell  back  to  the  crown,  and  being  at  the  sovereign's  disposal, 
was  meritoriously  bestowed,  by  King  David,  upon  Sir  William  Douglas  of  Liddis- 
dale. 


WILLIAM  DOUGLAS  Earl  of  Athol, 

Was  the  sou  of  Sir  James  Douglas  of  Louxion,  knight,  who  being  in  all  respects- 
a  hero,  and  having  performed  many  great  and  eminent  services  towards  his  sove- 
reign and  his  country,  in  the  time  of  King  David  II.  of  which  all  our  histories  are 
full,  he  had  a  grant  from  that  prince  of  the  earldom  of  Athol.  The  leai-ned  his- 
torian Mr  David  Hume  of  Godscroft  says,  that  the  charter  in  his  time  was  in  the 
register,  and  takes  particular  notice  of  the  precise  date,  which  he  says  was  the 
i6th  of  January  1341  {e).  He  was  before  that  time  designed  Dmninus  vallis  de 
Lydall,  and  is  witness  in  a  charter  granted  by  "  Jacobus  de  Douglas  dominus  loci, 
"  ejusdem  Jacobo  de  Sandilands,  et  Eleanora;  de  Bruce  sorori  suee,  de  tota  baronia 
"  de  WestCalderin  liberam  maritagiam"  (y}.  This  William  Douglas  of  Liddis- 
dale,  who  had  the  earldom  of  Athol,  made  it  over  to  Robert  the  Great  Steward  of 
Scotland,  Earl  of  Strathern,  and  died  without  issue-male  in  the  1353  {g}.  He  had 
got  the  barony  of  Dalkeith  by  the  marriage  of  Margaret,  daughter  and  heir  of 
Sir  John  Graham  of  Abercorn,  and  which  he  made  over  to  Sir  James  Douglas 
his  nephew  (/&),  and  his  estate  of  Liddisdale  went  to  William  the  first  Earl  of 
Douglas. 

Although  the  lands  of  the  earldom  of  Athol  were  in  the  person  of  Robert  the 
Great  Steward  of  Scotland,  and  Earl  of  Strathern,  both  before  and  after  his  acces- 
sion to  the  crown,  by  the  name  of  Robert  II.  yet  I  have  never  once  seen  him  de- 
signed Comes  Athole  ;  the  reason  I  conjecture  he  made  no  grants  out  of  the  earl- 
dom, resolving,  it  would  seem,  to  keep  it  still  entire,  as  a  part  of  the  patrimony  of 

{a)  Sir  William  Dugdale's  Baronage  of  England.  (A)  Sir  James  Dalrymple's  Collections,  and 
with  these  several  other  authentic  documents  concur,  (c)  The  Eail  of  Haddington's  Collections  from 
the  Registers,  while  he  was  Register,  in  the  Lawyers'  Library,  {c! )  The  ingenious  Mr  Nisbet  in  his 
Treatise  of  Heraldry,  page  294,  says,  he  had  seen  the  charter  in  the  custody  of  Rait  of  Halgreen. 
(f)  In  his  History  of  the  femily  of  the  Earls  of  Douglas  and  Earls  of  Angus.  Mr  Home  says,  in  his 
History,  that  the  charter  was  in  the  Register,  page  $<),  i6th  of  January  1341.  (/)  Charter  I  haye 
seen  in  the  hands  of  the  Lord  Torphichen.  (f)  Rymer's  FcEdera  Angliw,  ad  annum  1353,  mentions 
him  then  dead,     {h)  Charter  in  the  Rolls  of  King  David  in  the  Register. 


APPENDIX.  171 

die  crown  :  But  after  the  accession  of  his  son  King  Robert  III.  to  the  sovereigntyi 
in  the  1390,  he  gave  tlie  earldom  of  Athol  to  Duvid  Earl  of  Carrick,  Prince  and 
Stei\ard  of  Scotland,  his  eldest  sou.  who  thereupon,  in  several  charters  both  in  the 
public  register  and  also  in  private  hands,  designs  himself  David  Comes  de  Carrick  y 
Athole,  ac  senescallus  ^otiue  ;  and  that  even  after  he  was  created  Duke  of  Roth- 
say  by  the  king  his  father,  by  solemn  investiture  in  Parliament,  the  30th  of 
April  1390  ((^\  and  he  kept  the  title  of  Earl  of  Athol  till  his  death  on  Easter- 
day  of  the  year  1402  {b),  and  thereupon  the  king  resumed  the  earldom  of 
A.thol,  and  quickly  after  bestowed  it  upon  his  brother  Sir  Walter  Stewart  of 
terechin. 


WALTER  STEWART  Earl  of  Athol,  Strathern,  and  Caithness, 

THIS  prince  was  the  younger  of  the  two  sons  which  King  Robert  II.  the  first  of 
our  kings  of  the  Stewartine  line,  had  by  his  royal  consort  Queen  Euphame,  daugh- 
ter of  Hugh  Earl  of  Ross:  he  obtained  the  great  barony  and  estate  of  Brechin  in 
Forfarshire,  by  the  marriage  of  Margaret,  daughter  and  sole  heir  of  Sir  David 
Barclay  of  Brechin  (<:),  and  upon  that  he  is  designed  Bomimts  de  Brichen  (d) ; 
after  the  death  of  the  Duke  of  Rothsay  his  nephew,  his  brother  King  Robert  cre- 
ated and  invested  him,  as  the  manner  was,  in  the  honour  and  dignity  of  the  Earl 
of  Athol,  per  cincturam  gladii  comitatus.  The  precise  date  of  the  creation  I  have 
not  seen  in  any  voucher  that  has  come  in  my  way :  but  on  the  5th  of  June 
1403,  he  is  designed  IValtcnis  Comes  de  Athole,  in  letters  of  safe  conduct  by  the 
King  of  England,  allowing  him  to  come  into  his  dominions  the  length  of  St  Tho- 
mas of  Canterbury,  with  a  retinue  of  a  hundred  persons  in  his  company.  I 
presume  it  has  been,  as  was  usual  at  that  time,  to  pay  devotions  to  the  shrine  of 
Thomas  a-Becket,  who  was  canonized  by  the  Church  of  Roms;  though,  in  truth, 
he  appears  to  have  been  a  right  turbulent  man.  Upon  the  death  of  David  Earl 
of  Strathern,  without  heirs-male  of  his  body,  the  Earl  of  Athol  succeeded  to  the 
estate  of  the  eavldom  of  Caithness,  and  likewise  assumed  the  title  of  Cornes  Ca- 
tbanice,  as  well  as  AtboVue:  To  vouch  this  there  is  a  passport  or  safe  conduct  from 
the  Crown  of  England,  permitting  IValterum  Stuart  Comitem  de  Airhole  l^  Caith- 
ness to  come  into  England,  the  loth  of  April  1421  :  It  was  to  concert  measures 
towards  the  restoration  of  his  nephew  King  James  1,  (f)  ;  to  which,  to  do  him 
justice,  he  contributed  with  all  possible  zeal ;  and  how  soon  the  restoration  was 
effected,  he  was  in  the  highest  favour  without  any  outward  diminution  on  the 
king's  part  that  was  visible,  till  the  day  of  his  death.  He  was  Great  Justiciary 
of  Scotland  (/),  and  the  king  strove  to  heap  favours  on  him  ;  for  quickly  after 
his  restoration  he  gave  him  the  earldom  of  Strathern  for  life  (^)  ;  much  about 
the  same  time  he  resigned  the  earldom  of  Caithness  in  favour  of  Allan  Stewart 
his  second  son,  who  thereupon  was  invested  in  the  honour,  and  the  earldom 
provided  to  the  heirs-male  of  his  body  ;  which  failing,  to  return  to  his  father ; 
which  actually  happened,  on  his  death  without  issue,  in  1428  ;  for  he  was  slain 
at  the  battle  of  Innerlochy  that  year,  leaving  no  child  behind  him  ;  so  the  earl- 
dom of  Caithness  returned  to  his  father  the  Earl  of  Athol  again  ;  and  upon  that 
I  find  him  in  an  authentic  original  deed,  in  the  custody  of  the  Lord  Gray,  which 
I  have  seen,  wherein  he  is  designed  JValtenis  Comes  Palatinus  de  Strathern,  Athole  li 
Caithness,  of  the  date  the  8th  of  September  1438. 

I  have  ever  thought  this  Earl  of  Athol  one  of  the  very  worst  of  men  ;  for  no 
favour  could  oblige  him,  nor  courtesy  tie  him  to  his  duty;  for  the  king,  his  ne- 
phew, had  done  all  that  was  possible  that  way  ;  but  such  was  the  perverseness  ot 
his  own  natural  disposition,  that  all  the  favours  and  honours  the  king  had  in  a 
manner  pursued  him  with  could  make  no  impression  on  him,  though  it  appears 
that  the  king  had  no  suspicion  of  his  infidelity  to  himself,  for  he  not  only  employ- 

(rt)  Fordan  and  the  Chartulary  of  Murray.  (A)  Liber  Episcopatus  Dunblanen.  MSS.  penes  Mr  Ker. 
{c  Chjrter  in  the  register  of  charters,  and  are  printed  in  Mr  Hay's  Collectio.i  of  Charters.  {J)  Ry- 
mer's  Foedera  Anglia;.  (f)  Ibidem  ad  annum  1 42 1.  {/)  Decreet  pronounced  by  him  at  Foulis  in  the 
hands  of  the  Laird  of  Abercairny.     (^)  Charter  in  the  register. 


172  APPENDIX. 

ed  hiiri'  in  the  public  transactions  of  the  greatest  importance,  but  also  in  the  offi- 
ces of  nearest  trust  about  his  royal  person  :  but,  monstrously  wicked  as  he  must 
have  been,  what  in  all  the  world  could  induce  him  to  contrive  the  murder  of  his 
nephew  and  sovereign,  who  had  by  his  bounty  and  favoui-  made  him  so  great,  that 
the  king  himself  on  the  throne  was  only  greater  than  he.  It  could  not  possibly 
be  the  view  of  succeeding  to  the  crown,  for  the  king  had  a  son  of  his  own,  and 
his  elder  brother  of  the  full  blood,  the  Earl  of  Strathern,  had  issue,  though  they 
were  females,  who  were  a  bar  in  his  way  to  the  succession  ;  nor  can  it  be  imagin- 
ed that  he  had  any  notion  that  he  had  a  nearer  title,  or  a  preferable  right  to 
the  crown  than  the  king,  for  he  well  knew  that  Lady  Elizabeth  Mure  was  his 
father's  first  and  lawful  wife,  the  king's  grandmother,'  and  that  the  children  of 
that  marriage  did  seclude  from  the  succession  the  issue  he  had  by  the  Earl  of 
Athoi's  mother,  who  was  but  the  king's  second  wife;  this  could  never  be  his  view ; 
for  the  estates  of  parliament,  upon  his  father  Robert  II. 's  coming  to  the  crown, 
had  by  a  very  solemn  deed  recognised  the  right  of  succession  in  favour  of  all  the 
three  sons  he  had  by  his  first  wife,  as  his  lawful  and  undoubted  heirs  and  succes- 
sors ;  and  it  was  but  in  failure  of  these  that  the  crown  was  to  descend  to  his  bro- 
ther the  Earl  of  Strathern,  and  him  as  the  issue  of  the  king's  second  marriage  al- 
lenarly  in  failure  of  his  three  elder  brothers  (a),  John  Earl  of  Carrick,  who  came 
to  the  crown  by  the  name  of  Robert  III.,  Robert  Duke  of- Albany,  and  Alexander 
Enrl  of  Birfhan. 

Bat  what  black  views  he  had  God  only  knows.  Yet  certain  it  is  that  he  en- 
tered into  a  most  helHsh  conspiracy  to  murder  his  sovereign  and  nephew.  The 
principals  concerned  with  him  in  this  most  wicked  machination  were,  Robert 
Graham,  a  son  of  the  House  of  Kincardine,  and  his  own  grandson  Robert,  Mas- 
ter of  Athol,  who  was  of  the  Red-chamber  to  the  king,  and  so  had  the  more  easy 
access  to  the  court  unsuspected;  they  drew  in  one  Christopher  Colquhoun,  and 
Robert  Chalmer,  burgess  of  Perth,  to  concur  with  them,  and  some  lower  people 
who  depended  on  them,  to  commit  the  regicide,  which,  in  short,  they  found  means 
to  execute,  while  the  king  lay  at  the  convent  of  the  Carthusians  near  the  town  of 
Perth,  the  12th  day  of  February  1438  (b)  ;  the  earl  and  his  accomplices  were 
all  quickly  apprehended  and  brought  to  justice,  and  he  suffered  the  pains  of  law 
due  to  such  an  unnatural  regicide,  in  a  most  exemplary  manner  famous  over  all 
Europe.  The  particular  tortures  he  underwent  are  in  all  our  histories,  and  for 
that  reason  I  do  not  judge  it  necessary  to  transcribe  them  here.  However,  I  may 
here  remark,  that  this  Earl  of  Athol  at  the  very  last  did  an  act  of  justice  to  Sir 
Thomas  Maule  of  Panmure,  who  was  his  wife  the  Countess  of  Athol's  nearest 
heir,  for,  just  before  he  went  out  to  his  execution,  he  emitted  a  judicial  declara- 
tion, importing,  that  the  baronies  and  lordship  of  Brechin  had  been  held  by  him 
in  courtesy  of  his  wife  Dame  Margaret  'Barclay,  daughter  and  heir  of  Sir  David 
Barclay  of  Brechin  (r),  and  that  the  right  to  that  estate  after  himself  did  belong 
to  the  said  Sir  Thomas  Maule  of  Panmure,  in  right  of  his  grandmother  Marion,, 
only  daughter  of  Sir  David  Fleming  of  Biggar  by  Jean  his  wife,  daughter  of  Sir 
David  Barclay  of  Brechin  ;  Sir  Thomas  accordingly  laid  claim  after  the  Earl  of 
Athol's  death  to  the  lordship  of  Brechin  ;  but  that  being  by  the  ministry  in  the 
minority  of  King  James  II.  adjudged  to  be  included  in  the  Earl  of  Athol's  forfei- 
ture, Sir  Thomas  recovered  only  the  lands  of  Hedderwick,  Jackston,  and  Stoddock- 
muir,  with  Leuchlands,  part  of  the  lordship  of  Brechin,  in  Heu  of  the  whole,  though 
the  family  afterwards  recovered  the  whole  barony,  and  was  one  of  the  subaltern  ti- 
tles of  the  family  of  Maule,  when  they  were  raised  to  the  peerage  of  Earl  of  Pan- 
mur.  Upon  the  death  of  the  Earl  of  Athol,  the  earldom  of  Caithness,  together 
with  the  honour  of  Co?nes  Cathania,  was,  by  King  James  II.  erected  to  his  great 
favourite  Sir  George  Crichton  of  Cairns,  et  suis  assignatis,  anno  1452  (rf),  and  the 
title  and  earldom  of  Athol  to  his  uterine  brother  Sir  John  Stewart  of  Balveny. 

C<J^  Act  of  Parliament  still  extant  in  the  registers,  and  which  Mr  Hay  has  printed  in  his  Collection  of 
Charters  from  the  archives,  (b)  Buchanan  and  the  other  historians.  (c)  Charter  in  the  Register  cf 
Charters,     (d)  Ibidem. 


APPENDIX.  173 


STEWART  Earl  of  Athol. 

THIS  illustrious  branch  of  the  royal  family  of  the  Stewarts  were  lineally  de- 
scended of  Sir  John  Stewart  of  Bonkill,  son  of  Alexander  Lord  High  Steward  of 
Scotland,  brother  of  James  Lord  High  Steward,  and  great  uncle  to  Knig  Robert  II. 
This  Sir  John  Stewart,  in  the  Fmkra  An^^Iice,  and  in  Prynne's  History,  is  designed 
frater  germamis  Jacobi  Scnescalli  Scotite.  He  was  a  gallant  brave  man,  and  lost 
his  life  in  the  service  of  his  country,  against  the  English  at  the  battle  of  Falkirk, 
the  22d  of  July  129S  ( /_).  He  left  issue  by  Margaret,  his  wife,  daughter  of  Sir 
Alexander  de  Bonkyll  of  Bonkill  {b),  several  sons  who  laid  the  foundation  of  several 
noble  and  illustrious  families. 

Alexander  Stewart  of  Bonkill,  the  eldest  son,  was  created  Earl  of  Angus  by 
King  Robert  1.  upon  the  exile  of  the  English  family  of  the  Umphravilles,  who 
had  been  Earls  of  Angus,  anno  1327.  This  noble  family  of  the  Stewarts,  Earls  of 
Angus,  ended  in  a  daughter,  Margaret,  Countess  of  Angus,  daughter  and  heir  of 
Thomas  Earl  of  Angus,  who  made  over  his  estate  to  George  Douglas,  her  son,  by 
William,  first  Earl  of  Douglas  (c),  and  of  whom  the  present  Duke  of  Douglas  is  the 
lineal  heir,  and  who,  upon  that  account,  quarters  the  coat  of  Stewart  in  his  Grace's 
achievement. 

Sir  Allan  Stewart  of  Dreghorn,  another  son,  of  whom,  by  writs  and  docu- 
ments, were  lineally  descended  the  Stewarts  of  Darnly,  and  Earls  and  Dukes  of 
Lennox. 

Sir  James  Stewart  of  Pierston,  another  of  his  sons,  was  the  original  ancestor 
and  founder  of  the  illustrious  Houses  of  the  Stewarts  of  Lorn,  Innermeth,  and 
Athol  (rf).  This  Sir  James  got  a  charter  from  King  Robert  I.  of  the  lands  of  Piers- 
ton  and  Warwickhill,  in  baronia  de  Ciiningham  {e).  In  the  deed  he  is  designed 
yacobus  Senescalli  filius  quondam  Domini  yohannis  Senescalli,  militis.  He  was  slain 
with  two  of  his  brothers,  Allan  and  John,  at  the  battle  of  Halidonhill,  in  the 
1333  (/).  He  left  behind  him  three  sons.  Sir  John  Stewart,  designed  of  Pierston, 
in  a  charter  in  the  registers  in  the  1356  (^)..  He  had  after  that  a  charter  from 
King  Robert  II.  of  the  lands  and  barony  of  Kelly  in  Forfarshire,  in  the  1384  {b'). 
He  left  only  one  daughter,  his  heir,  who  married  Sir  William  Douglas,  who,  up- 
on that,  comes  to  be  designed  Dominus  de  Pierston  (/),  whose  estate  came  to  his 
three  heirs-female;  Agnes  married  to  John  Blair  of  Adamton,  Margaret  to  Archi- 
bald Crawfurd  of  Thirdpart,  and  a  third  to  Robert  Barclay;  who  all  make  over  their 
respective  shares  of  the  barony  of  Kelly  to  William  Ochterlony,  in  the  1444  («). 
The  second  son  of  Sir  James  Stewart  of  Pierston  was  Sir  Robert  Stewart,  hist  de- 
signed of  Shandbothy,  and  then  of  Innermeth.  He  bad  a  charter  of  the  lands  of 
Snandbothy  from  his  cousin  Thomas  de  Moravia  Dominus  de  Bothwell  (I J.  He, 
Robertas  Senescal  de  Shandbotb,  in  the  33d  of  King  David  II.  gets  a  charter  of  the 
lands  of  Dalziel,  in  the  shire  of  Lanark,  then  in  the  crown,  by  the  forfeiture  of 
Robert  de  la  Wall  fhij.  The  same  Robert  Senescal  Dominus  de  Shandbolby  on  the 
8th  of  March,  the  38th  of  King  David,  gets  a  charter  of  the  one  half  of  the  barony 
of  Redcastle,  in  the  county  of  Fo.far,  on  the  resignation  of-  Sir  Andrew  Camp- 
bell, who  was  of  Loudon  (^« J.  He  comes  afterwards  to  be  designed  of  Innermeth, 
and  by  that  title  he  is  witness  to  a  donation  by  Walter  Murray  of  Tiillibardin  in 
the  1362,  to  the  abbey  of  Culross  ;  and  in  the  Parliament  of  Robert  II.  held  at 
Scone,  April  4.  1373,  he  is  designed  Robertus  Senescallus  de  Inncrmeath  (0).     And 

(a  In  this  all  our  histories  concur,  but  more  particularly  the  learned  and  ingenious  Mr  David  Simpson, 
in  his  history  of  the  Stewarts,, published  in  the  171 1.  (b)  Ibidem.  (c)  Charter  m  the  hands  of  the 
Dulie  of  Dougl?.s.  and  printed  in  the  Peerage  ;  and  with  this  concurs  several  charters  in  the  custody  of 
the  Lord  Torphichen.  •  d)   Mr  Simpson's  history  of  the  royal   and  illustrious  family  of  the  Stewarts', 

(f)  Charta  in  publicis  archivis.  1 /)  Fordun.  (_f  ■  In  a  charter  by  Johannes  Maxwel'Dominus  ejusdem. 
of  the  church  of  Libberton,  to  the  abbacy  of  Kilwinning.  (/6)  Charta  in  regisiro.  W)  Charta  penes 
Will.  FuUarton,  de  eodem,  ad  annum  i^ipi.  (;f)  Penes  C.  Panmure.  {f\  In  the  charter-chest  of  Stewart 
of  Rosyth.  Km)  In  the  custody  of  Dalziel.  jv  Charter  in  the  public  registers  of  King  David  II. 
'0)  Mt  Simpson's  account  of  the  House  of  Rosyth,  from  the  writs  which  he  said  he  had  perused. 

Vol.  IE  6  E 


174  APPENDIX. 

by  the  same  title  and  designation  he  gets  a  charter  of  the  lands  of  Durisdccr,  on 
the  resignation  of  Alexander  Menzies  of  Redhall  CpJ.  He  died  in  the  1384,  and 
left  behind  him  two  sons,  Sir  John  Stewart  of  Innermeth  and  Loin,  and"  Sir  Ro- 
bert Stewart,  who  gets  a  charter  from  his  brother,  John  Stewart  of  Innermeth,  of 
an  annuity  of  L.20  Sterling,  payable  out  of  the  barony  of  Dnrisdeer  which  is 
confirmed  under  the  Great  Seal  of  King  Robert  II.  the  2cth  of  April,  the  15th  of 
his  reign  (qj.  And  after  that,  the  same  Robert  Stewart  of  Durisdeer,  has  a  char- 
ter of  the  iands  of  Durisdeer,  on  the  resignation  of  John  Stewart  of  Innermeth, 
his  brother,  bearing  date  April  18.  1388  (rj.  This  Sir  Robert  Stewart  was  the 
ancestor  of  the  Stewarts  of  the  family  of  Rosyth  in  Fife,  and  Craigiehall  in  Lin- 
lithgowshire. 

Sir  John  Stewart  of  Innermeth,  son  and  heir  of  Sir  Robert  Stewart  of  Inner- 
meth, succeeded  his  father,  and  obtained  the  great  barony  of  Lorn  in  Argyle- 
shire,  by  the  marriage  of  Isabel,  the  daughter  and  heir  of  Eiiirene  de  Ergadia  of 
Lorn,  a  great  family  of  the  Macdonalds ;  upon  that  he  comes  to  be  designed  Jo- 
hannes Senescallus  de  Linermeath,  Domirius  de  Lorn,  both  in  tlie  Fcedera  Anglics,  in 
the  1407,  and  in  a  charter  to  Malcolm  Oliphant  of  the  land  of  Haslehead  in  anno 
141 2  CsJ.     He  left  issue  by  Isabel,  his  wife,  aforesaid. 

Robert  Stewart  of  Innermeth  and  Lorn,  who  was  created  a  baron  and  baro- 
net, and  a  Lord  of  Parliament  by  King  James  II.  by  the  title  of  Lord  Lorn  (tj,  of 
whom  afterwards. 

Sir  James  Stewart,  Knight,  commonly  called  the  Black  Knight  of  Lorn,  the 
paternal  ancestor  of  the  Earls  of  Athol  fuj. 

Alexander,  a  third  son,  who  had  in  patrimony  the  lands  of  Banchory  in  Clack- 
mananshire,  as  appears  by  his  charter  from  his  father ;  of  whom  is  descended  Sir 
George  Stewart  of  GrandtuUy,  in  a  lineal  course  of  succession  from  a  connected  pro- 
gress of  writs  I  have  seen  C'^J-  He  had  also  a  daughter.  Christian,  who  was  mar- 
ried to  Sir  David  Murray  of  Tullibardin,  paternal  ancestor  to  his  Grace  the  Duke 
of  Athol  (^iwj,  and  had  issue. 

This  Sir  James  Stewart,  the  Black  Knight  of  Lorn,  as  he  is  usually  designed  by 
the  historians,  being  a  gentleman  of  birth  and  merit,  and  withal  a  handsome 
graceful  young  man,  the  Qiieen  Jane  Dowager  of  James  I.  daughter  of  John  Duke 
of  Somerset,  son  of  John  of  Gaunt  Duke  of  Lancaster,  son  of  Edward  III.  King 
of  England,  made  choice  of  him,  among  all  the  nobility  of  Scotland,  to  be  her 
husband,  and  sharer  in  her  royal  bed  :  upon  this  marriage  with  the  Qiieen  he 
thought  he  had  a  good  title  to  get  into  the  administration  ;  but  the  ministry,  in 
the  minority  of  King  James  II.  kept  a  watchful  eye  over  him  and  the  Qiieen  his 
wife,  that  they  might  not  get  the  young  king  into  their  hands,  and,  under  the 
shadow  of  their  authority,  to  rule  at  his  pleasure  ;  at  least  they  apprehended  so. 
The  Lord  Crichton,  the  Prime  Minister,  being  a  wise  sagacious  prudent  man, 
having  discovered  some  tampering  the  queen  and  her  husband  had  with  those  to 
whom  the  care  of  the  king's  person  was  intrusted,  to  decoy  him  into  their  power, 
upon  which  Sir  James  Stewart  was  committed  to  prison,  from  whence  he  was  not 
released  till  the  Earl  of  Huntly  bailed  him  for  his  good  behaviour  for  a  very  great 
sum  of  m<-ney  in  those  days. 

Sir  James  Stewart  being  a  high-spirited  man,  and  taking  himself  to  be  much 
neglected  by  the  ministry,  he  chose  rather  to  leave  the  country  and  go  beyond 
sea  ;  accordingly,  in  the  1448,  he  obtained  a  passport  to  himself  and  James  Stewart 
his  second  son,  and  some  servants  in  his  retinue,  to  pass  through  England,  or  to 
come  into  that  realm.  In  his  passage  to  foreign  parts  he  was  taken  at  sea  by  some 
Elemings,  and  carried  to  Flanders,  where,  not  long  after,  he  died,  but  left  issue 
by  the  Qiieen  Dowager,  his  wife,  three  sons. 

Sir  John  Stewart  of  Balveny,  afterwards  honoured  by  the  title  of  Earl  of 
Athol. 

(^p)  Rosyth  writs,  (y)  The  oriEsinal  charter  I  have  seen  in  the  cu5tody  of  the  Duke  of  Douglas,  also  in 
Mr  Simpson's  Collections,  (r)  The  account  of  the  Stewarts  of  Rosyth,  done  from  the  writs  of  the  fami- 
ly, bv  Mr  Simpson,  in  ray  own  custody.  (,r)  The  original  charter  I  have  seen  in  the  hands  of  Laurence 
Oliphant  of  Gask.  (0  Liber  Culross  MSS.  and  Mr  Thomas  Crawfutd's  notes  on  Buchanan,  {u)  All 
our  historians  concur  in  this,  (f)  Original  charter  which  I  have  seen  in  the  hands  of  Sir  George  Stewart 
of  GrandtuUy,  dated  the  iph  of  June  1491.  (ui)  Writs  of  the  family  of  Tullibardin,  and  her  armr 
impaled  on  the  College  of  Tullibardin. 


APPENDIX,  i75 

Sir  James  Stewart  of  Auchteihouse,  thereafter  Earl  of  Buchan,  ■who  was  Great 
Chamberlain  of  Scotland  in  the  rei,a,n  of  King  James  III.  (c/),  of  whom  the  Stewarts 
Earls  of  Buchan,  and  the  Earl  of  Traqiiair,  are  lineally  descended. 

Andrew,  the  third  son,  was  bred  to  the  church,  and  taking-  holy  orders  was 
made  a  Prebend  and  Canon  of  Glasgow  (/;),  and  Rector  of  Monkland  in  the  1456: 
After  that  he  was  preferred  to  the  Provostry  of  Lincluden,  anno  i^jy,  and  con- 
stituted Lord  Privy  Seal,  then  void  by  the  death  of  Bishop  TuUoch,  anno  1482  (t), 
and  the  same  year  was  preferred  to  the  Episcopal  See  of  Murray,  and  was  conse- 
crated according  to  the  ancient  form ;  here  he  sat  and  exercised  the  duties  of  his 
function  till  liis  death  in  the  1501  Ql),  and  was  interred  in  the  choir  of- the  Cathe- 
dral Church  of  Elgin. 

Sir  JoHM  SrcwART  of  Balvcny,  uterine  brother  to  King  James  II.  was  in  a  high 
degree  of  favour  with  that  prince,  and,  by  the  king's  special  countenance,  he  ob- 
tained in  marriage  the  Lady  Margaret  Douglas,  daughter  and  lieir  of  Archibald 
Duke  of  Touraine  and  Earl  of  Douglas,  and  widow  of  William  Earl  of  Douglas, 
with  whom  he  got  in  marriage  portion  the  lands  and  barony  of  Balveny,  then  in 
the  crown  by  the  forfeiture  of  Sir  John  Douglas,  brother  to  the  Earl  of  Douglas, 
and  soon  thereafter  was  invested  in  the  honour  and  dignity  of  Earl  of  Atliol  in  the 
1457;  *°'''  '"  ^^1^  Frrdera  An^liae,  there  is  that  year  a  truce  and  peace  concluded 
with  England,  and  he,  John  Earl  of  Athol,  is  one  of  the  conservators  for  the  part 
of  Scotland.  In  the  1460  King  James  his  brother  gives  him  a  charter,  "  terra- 
"  rum  dominii  de  Balveny  a  dilecto  fratri  suo  Johanni  Stuart  Comiti  Atholie"  (f), 
and  he  takes  a  new  investiture  of  his  estate  of  the  earldom  of  Athol  from  his  ne- 
phew King  James  III.  "  de  toto  et  integro  comitatu  Atholie,  et  terris  ejusdem 
"  comitatus,  exceptis  terris  de  Drumquhule  et  hx-redibus  suis  masculis  de  corpore 
"  suo  legitime  procreatis  seu  procreandis,  quibus  deficientibus  nobis  et  ha;redibus 
"  nostris  reversuris."  The  charter  is  dated  the  1 8th  of  March  1480  (/).  History 
represents  this  earl  to  have  been  a  wise  prudent  man,  as  well  as  gallant  and  brave. 
As  the  king's  lieutenant,  he  was  highly  instrumental  in  suppressing  the  rebellion  of 
the  Earl  of  Ross,  and  bringing  him  to  submit  to  the  king's  mercy :  For  this  piece 
of  acceptable  service  he  had  a  grant  of  many  lands  from  the  crown  that  had  be- 
longed to  the  Earl.  And  further,  to  express  his  success  in  suppressing  that  re- 
bellion, he  got  assigned  him,  or  he  assumed  to  himself,  that  device  or  motto,  that 
is  to  this  day  borne  by  his  successors,  on  the  achievement  of  the  family,  Furth 
fortune  and  fill  the  fetters.  In  the  fatal  disputes  betwixt  King  James  111.  and  some 
of  the  nobility,  the  Earl  of  Athol  set  himself  all  that  was  possible  to  soften  the 
king,  and  to  bring  the  disaffected  nobihty  to  a  sense  of  their  duty;  and  when 
things  were  come  to  a  crisis,  that  the  king,  for  the  security  of  his  person,  retired 
to  the  castle  of  Edinburgh,  he  could  not  think  of  trusting  the  command  of  it  to 
any  other  but  to  his  uncle  the  Earl  of  Athol  (j^j,  an  order  being  directed  to  the 
Lord  Darnly,  the  former  governor,  to  that  effect.  In  the  1484  he  was  one  of  the 
conservators  of  a  peace  that  was  then  agreed  to  with  the  English,  in  order,  as  he 
had  reason  to  suspect,  the  better  to  be  in  a  condition  to  settle  tlie  distracted  state 
of  his  own  country,  that  was  rent  in  pieces  by  intestine  animosities  and  broils,  . 
and  which  he  had  all  along  strenuously  studied  to  compose.  It  seems  very  plain, 
that  though  the  Earl  of  Athol  did  not  approve  of  some  steps  and  measures  the  king 
had  taken,  in  reference  to  the  administration,  towards  the  end  of  his  reign,  yet 
he  did  not  conceive  that  those  mistakes  could  dissolve  his  allegiance,  or  discharge 
him  from  that  duty,  as  a  faithful  and  loyal  subject,  he  owed  to  his  sovereign:  For 
when  the  king  thought  himself  obliged  to  take  the  field,  for  tlie  vindication  of  his 
honour,  and  to  support  the  dignity  of  the  crown,  the  Earl  of  Athol,  his  uncle,  re- 
paired to  his  standard,  with  a  great  body  of  men,  such  as  he  could  easily  raise. . 
Some  of  our  historians  (Jj)  say,  there  were  with  the  king,  in  all,  at  the  field  of 
Bannockburn,  ten  thousand  Highlandmen  with  bows,  that  they  made  up  the  van 
ot  the  army,   and  that  they  were  commanded  by  the  Earls  of  Athol  and  Huntly. 

(a)  Lives  of  the  Officers  of  State,  (b)  Chartulary  of  the  College  of  Glasgow,  (r )  Cliarta  in  pub- 
licis  archivis.  {d)  Ibidem,  {e)  In  the  public  records  of  the  Great  Seal,  Book.  6.  Charta  97.  (/)  Also 
in  the  public  records,  Book  3.  Charta  I.  (^)  Our  historians,  Leslie,  Bucnanan.  (/)  Mr  Lindsay  of 
?itscally  in  particular. 


176  APPENDIX. 

The  fate  of  that  day  every  one  knows,  the  unfortunate  king  was  slain,  and  the 
Prince,  James  IV.  came  to  the  throne.  1  do  not  find  that  the  Earl  of  Athol,  after 
this,  was  concerned  in  the  administration;  I  have  ground  to  believe,  his  principles 
being  quite  opposite  to  those  who  were  in  power,  and  the  ministry,  he  did  not 
care  to  mix  in  their  councils  or  deliberations;  and,  I  fancy,  they  were  well 
enough  pleased  to  be  quit  of  so  great  a  man  that  was  capable  to  have  controlled  their 
actings  at  that  time,  and  to  have  set  things  in  another  kind  of  light  than  they  in- 
tended they  should  be  seen  in,  or  that  the  world  should  have  a  view  of:  However, 
he  now  understood,  that  submission  to  the  new  king  was  as  much  his  duty  as  it 
was  to  his  father,  while  he  was  alive,  and  could  not  be  wrought  on  to  join  with 
the  Earl  of  Huntly,  the  Lord  Forbes,  or  the  master  of  Lennox,  who  all  set  up  in 
different  quarters  of  the  country,  to  revenge  the  late  king's  death;  for  the  earl 
well  knew  the  dismal  effects  of  a  civil  war  in  the  bowels  of  the  kingdom,  and  that 
It  could  have  no  other  end  but  a  deluge  of  blood,  rapine,  and  confusion,  especially 
seeing  there  was  no  usurper  on  the  throne,  no  prince  secluded  from  his  right  of 
succession  to  the  crown,  and  the  king  then  in  being  had  the  same  right  to  their 
allegiance  as  his  father  James  IIL  had  while  he  was  alive. 

This  noble  Earl  married  first,  as  we  have  before  observed,  Lady  Margaret  Dou- 
glas, daughter  of  Archibald  Duke  of  Touraine,  and  Earl  of  Douglas,  by  whom  he 
had  only  two  daughters,  Jean,  who  was  married  to  Alexander,  third  Earl  of  Huntly, 
ancestor  to  the  present  Duke  of  Gordon,  and  had  issue  («);  and  Katharine  to  John 
Lord  Forbes,  and  had  issue  (6). 

He  married  next  Lady  Eleanora  St  Clair,  daughter  of  William  Earl  of  Orkney 
and  Caithness,  who  was  Lord  High  Chancellor  in  Ihe  reign  of  King  James  IL  by 
whom  he  had  a  numerous  issue. 

John,  his  eldest  son,  the  next  succeeding  Earl  of  Athol. 

Andrew,  the  second  son,  who  was  bred  to  the  church,  and  in  orders,  was  Pre- 
bend of  Craig  (r);  and,  on  the  death  of  Bishop  Brown  of  Dunkeld,  in  the  1515, 
was  postulate  bishop  of  that  see,  by  such  of  the  prebends  as  were  present,  and  his 
title  was  supported  by  the  Duke  of  Albany  the  regent,  against  Gavin  Douglas  the 
Earl  of  Angus's  brother,  who  had  been  preferred  by  the  interest  of  the  Queen  Re- 
gent. At  length  the  matter  was  agreed  and  composed  by  the  prudent  mediation 
of  their  friends,  on  these  terms,  that  Mr  Stewart  should  keep  what  of  the  revenues 
of  the  bishoprick  he  had  formerly  received,  and  possess  the  churches  of  Alyth  and 
Cargill,  paying  to  the  bishop  certain  chalders  of  victual.  The  Governor  of  Scot- 
land wrote  to  the  Pope  to  confirm  the  agreement,  wherein  he  says,  that  Mr 
Stewart,  the  Earl  of  Athol's  son,  was  "  Regio  sanguine  ex  utroque  parente  pro- 
"  creatum  ((f).  Li  the  1518  he  was  preferred  to  the  Episcopal  See  of  Caithness, 
then  void  by  the  death  of  Bishop  Stewart,  who  had  been  Lord  Treasurer  (f), 
where  he  sat  for  the  space  of  twenty-two  years,  even  to  his  death  in  the  1542  (J  ^ 
Besides  these  two  sons  the  Earl  of  Athol  had,  of  his  second  marriage,  nine  daugh- 
ters, who  brought  a  great  and  numerous,  as  well  as  an  illustrious  alHance  to  the 
family. 

Elizabeth,  who  was  married  to  Andrew  Lord  Gray  of  Foulis,  who  was  Justice- 
General  of  Scotland  in  the  reign  of  King  James  IV.  (^),  and  had  issue. 

Jean  to  Sir  Robert  Gordon  of  Pitlurg  (/>),  and  had  issue. 

Catharine  to  Niel  Stewart  of  Bruicli,  but  had  no  issue  (/). 

Isabel  to  Alexander  Robertson  of  Struan,  elder  (/^),  and  had  issue. 

to  Donald  Robertson  of  Struan,  younger,  but  had  no  issue. 

M.\RjoR.y  to  Sir  Colin  Campbell  of  Glenorchy,  ancestor  to  the  Earl  of  Breadal- 
bane  (/),  and  had  issue. 

(fl)  Many  authorities  concur  in  tViis.  both  in  the  writs  of  the  respective  families^  and  the  Registers- 
{b^  Ealfoiu-'s  Collections  in  Bib.  Jurid.  (c)  Life  of  Gavin  Bishop  of  Dunkeld,  and  Dr  Miln's  Lives 
of  the  Bishops  of  Dunkeld,  in  Bib.  Jurid.  {d  Crlkction  of  State  Letters  of  King  James  IV.  in  the 
Lawyers'    Ltbrary,   and    of  i.ite   published    by   Mr  Ruddiman,  (t>)   Lives  of  the   officers   of  State. 

(/.  Bishop  Spottiswood's  List  of  the  Bishops  of  Caithness.  {g\  Writs  of  the  House  of  Gray,  and  in 
the  rei,isters.  h  Gen.  Gordonic.  (/)  Tiis  lady  is  set  down  by  Sir  James  Balfour  in  the  number  of 
the  daughters  of  this  Earl  o;  Athol.  I^k  >  1  have  seen  a  charter  to  them  in  the  IJ05,  and  also  in  Si'- 
James  Balfour's  List.     (/)  Genealogy  ol  the  House  of  Glenorchy,  and  that  of  the  House  of  Athol. 

3 


APPENDIX.  r77 

Margaret  to  Sir  William  Murray  of  Tullibardin,  the  ancestor  of  the  present 
Duke  of  Athol  («). 

Anne  to  John  Earl  of  Lennox,  whose  son,  Matthew  Earl  of  Lennox,  was  regent 
to  his  grandson  King  James  VL  in  his  minority:  So  this  way  we  may  observe, 
that  all  those  princes  that  are  descended  of  our  King  James  VL  and  the  first  mo- 
narch of  Great  Britain,  have  the  blood  of  the  Stewarts  of  the  House  of  Athol  run- 
ning in  their  veins. 

This  John  Earl  of  Athol  died  on  the  19th  of  September  151 2  (Zi),  and  was  in- 
terred in  the  Cathedral  Church  of  Dunkeld,  his  estate  and  honour  devolving  on  hrs 
son  and  heir 

John,  the  secot>d  of  this  line,  Earl  of  Athol :  He  married  Mary,  daughter  of 
Colin  the  first  Earl  of  Argyle,  who  was  Lord  Chancellor  in  the  reign  of  James  IV. (r). 
by  whom  he  had  two  sons,  John,  his  heir,  and  Sir  James  Stewart,  who  had  no  suc- 
cession (d);  also  he  had  several  daughters: 

[anet,  the  eldest,  was  married  first  to  Alexander,  Master  of  Sutherland,  son 
and  heir-apparent  of  Adam  and  Elizabeth  Earl  and  Countess  of  Sutherland  {e}, 
and  had  issue;  next  to  Sir  Hugh  Kennedy  of  Girvanmains  (/),  and  had  issue; 
after  that  to  Henry  Stewart,  the  first  Lord  Methven,  brother  to  the  Lord  Ochil- 
tree, and  who  had  been  formerly  married  to  Margaret  Queen  Dowager  of  King 
James  IV.  (^)  and  had  issue  to  him  also;  and,  last  of  all,  she  married  Patrick  Lord 
Ruthven  (/j),  but  had  no  issue. 

Helen,  the  second,  was  married  to  John  Lord  Lindsay  of  the  Byres  (/),  the 
paternal  ancestor  of  the  present  Earl  of  Crawford  and  Lindsay. 

Elizabeth,  the  third,  to  CoHn  Mackenzie  of  Kintail(;^),  predecessor  to  the 
Lords  Kintail  and  Earls  of  Seaforth,  and  had  issue. 

Jean,  the  fourth,  to  James  Arbuthnot  of  that  Ilk,  ancestor  of  the  present  Vis-- 
count  of  Arbuthnot,  and  had  issue  (/). 

Isabel,  the  fifth,  to  James  Herring  of  Lethendy  and  Glascuine,  in  the  county  of 
Perth,  and  had  issue  (;;j}. 

John,  the  third  of  this  line  of  the  Earls  of  Athol.  Of  this  Earl,  it  is  remarked 
by  the  history,  that  he  lived  like  a  sovereign  prince,  and  had  his  degrees  of  gen- 
tlemen about  him:  He  was  famous  for  his  great  hospitality,  and  his  magnificent 
way  of  living.  In  the  summer  of  the  year  1529  he  had  the  honour  to  entertain 
King  James  V.  the  Queen  Dowager,  and  the  pope's  nuncio,  or  resident  in  Scotland 
for  the  time,  at  a  hunting  in  Athol,  for  three  or  four  days,  in  all  the  grandeur  of 
a  king,  and  was  served,  says  the  author,  in  every  respect  as  well  and  as  great  as  if 
he  had  been  in  any  of  his  own  palaces.  The  historian,  from  whom  I  take  this,  is 
Mr  Lindsay  of  Pitscotty,  an  ingenuous,  plain,  honest  gentleman,  whose  history  is 
not  long  ago  published ;  so  the  account  of  this  grand  entertainment  I  shall  give  in 
his  own  words. 

"  The  next  summer  the  king  past  to  the  Highland  to  hunt,  and  took  with  him 
"  his  mother  Margaret  Queen  of  Scotland,  and  an  ambassador  of  the  Pope  who 
"  was  in  Scotland  at  the  time  :  The  Earl  of  Athole,  hearing  of  the  king's  coming, 
"  made  great  provision  for  him,  in  all  things  pertaining  to  a  prince  ;  that  he  was 
"  as  well  served  and  eased  with  all  things  necessary  to  his  estate,  as  if  he  had 
"  been  in  his  own  palace  at  Edinburgh.  For  I  heard  say,  that  this  noble  earl 
"  gart  make  a  curious  palace  to  the  king,  to  his  mother,  and  to  the  ambassador, 
"  where  they  were  so  honourably  eased  and  lodged  as  they  had  been  in  England, 
"  France,  Italy,  or  Spain,  concerning  the  time  and  equivalent  for  their  hunting 
"  and  pastime,  which  was  budded  in  the  midst  of  a  fair  meadow,  a  fair  palace  of 
"  green  timber,  wind  with  great  birks,  that  were  green  both  under  and  above, 
"  which  was  fashioned  in  four  quarters,  and  in  every  quarter  and  nuke  thereof  a 

(a)  Writs  as  well  as  Balfour's  Collections  relating  to  Athol.  {/>)  Holinshed's  History.  (<")  Exact 
Account  of  the  Matches  and  Alliances  of  the  House  of  Athol,  supported  from  writs  1  have  seen. 
(4  Sir  John  Scott's  Memoirs  of  the  Scots  Statesmen,  MSB.  (0  Writs  of  the  House  of  Sutherland, 
and  in  the  registers.  (/)  Ibidem.  (^)  Writs  in  the  registers  and  elsewhere  I  have  seen,  (h)  Mr  Knox's 
History.  (/)  Charter  to  them  in  the  register  in  1526,  and  other  authorities.  (i)  Ibid-  (/)  Ibid, 
(m)  Ibid. 

Vol.  IL  6  F 


178 


APPENDIX. 


"  great  round,  as  it  had  been  a  block-house,  wliich  was  lofted  and  geisted  the 
"  space  of  three  house  height ;  the  floors  laid  with  green  sharets,  medvvarts,  and 
"  flowers,  that  no  man  knew  whereon  he  zeid,  but  as  he  had  been  in  a  garden. 
"  Further,  there  were  two  great  rounds  in  ilk  side  of  the  gate,  and  a  great  port- 
"  cullis  of  tree,  falling  down  with  the  manner  of  a  barrace,  with  a  draw-bridge, 
"  and  a  great  stank  of  water,  of  sixteen  foot  deep  and  thirty  foot  of  breadth. 
«'  And  also  this  palace  was  hung  with  fine  tapestry  and  arresses  of  silk,  and 
"  lighted  with  fine  glass-windows  in  all  airths ;  that  this  palace  was  costly  decored 
"  with  all  necessaries  pertaining  to  a  prince,  as  it  had  been  in  his  own  royal  palace 
''  at  home.  Further,  this  earl  gart  make  such  provision  for  the  king  and  his 
"  mother,  and  the  ambassador,  that  they  had  all  manner  of  meats,  drniks,  and 
•'  delicacies,  that  were  to  be  gotten  at  that  time  in  Scotland ;  that  is  to  "say,  all 
"  kind  of  drink,  as,  ale,  beer,  wine,  both  white  and  claret,  Malvasy,  Muskadel, 
"  Hippocras  and  aquavitae.  Further,  there  was  of  meats,  wheat-bread,  main- 
"  bread,  ginge-bread  ;  with  fleshes,  beef,  mutton,  lamb,  veil,  vennison,  goose,  grice, 
•'  capon,  coney,  cran,  swan,  partridge,  plover,  duck,  drake,  brissel-cock,  and 
"  pawnies,  black-cock,  and  muir-fowl,  capercailies :  and  also  the  stanks  that  were 
'«  round  about  the  palace  were  full  of  all  delicate  fishes,  as  salmonds,  trouts, 
"  pearches,  pikes,  eels,  and  all  other  kind  of  delicate  fishes  that  could  be  gotten 
•'  in  fresh  waters ;  and  all  ready  for  the  banquet.  Syne  were  there  proper  stew- 
"  ards,  cunning  baxters,  excellent  cooks  and  potingars,  with  confections  and 
♦'  druggs  for  their  desert ;  and  the  halls  and  chambers  were  prepared  with  costly 
•'  bedding,  vessel,  and  napry,  according  for  a  king ;  so  that  he  wanted  none  of 
"  his  orders  more  than  he  had  been  at  home  in  his  own  palace.  The  king  re- 
«•  mained  in  this  wilderness  three  days  and  three  nights  at  the  hunting,  and  his 
'«  company,  as  I  have  shown.  I  heard  men  say,  it  cost  the  Earl  of  Athole  every 
"  day,  in  expences,  a  thousand  pounds.  The  ambassador  of  the  Pope,  seeing  this 
"  great  banquet  and  triumph  made  in  a  wilderness,  where  there  was  no  town  near 
"  for  twenty  miles,  thought  it  a  great  marvel  that  such  a  thing  could  be  in  Scot- 
"  land,  considering  that  it  was  named  The  arse  of  the  world  by  other  countries; 
"  that  there  should  be  such  honesty  and  policy,  and  especially  in  the  High-land, 
"  where  there  was  but  wood  and  wilderness.  But  most  of  all,  the  ambassador 
"  marvelled  to  see,  that  when  the  king  departed,  and  all  his  men  took  their  leave, 
'•  the  Highlandmen  set  all  this  fair  palace  in  a  fire,  that  the  king  and  the  am- 
"  bassador  might  see  it.  Then  the  ambassador  said  to  the  king,  I  marvel.  Sir, 
"  that  you  should  thole  yon  tan-  palace  to  be  brunt,  that  your  grace  has  been  so 
"  well  lodged  in.  Then  the  king  answered  the  ambassador,  and  said,  It  is  the 
"  use  of  our  Highlandmen,  though  they  be  never  so  well  lodged,  to  burn  their 
"  lodgings  when  they  depart  {a)." 

This  noble  hospitable  earl  married  first  Grizel,  daughter  and  at  length  sole  heir 
of  Sir  John  Rattray  of  that  Ilk,  {b),  a  very  ancient  family  in  the  county  of  Perth, 
by  whom  he  had  only  one  son,  his  heir,  John,  Master  of  Athol,  and  six  daugh- 
ters, 

Margaret,  the  eldest,  who  was  married  to  John  Grant  of  Freuchie,  the  Laird 
of  Grant  (<:),  and  had  issue. 

Jean,  the  second,  to  John  Otterburn  of  Reidhall,  son  and  heir  of  Sir  Adam 
Otterburn  of  Reidhall,  who  was  Lord  Advocate  to  King  James  V.  {d),  and 
had  issue.  The  lineal  heir  of  this  family  is  Alexander  Hamilton  of  Innerwick^ 
Esq. 

the  third,  to  the  Laird  of  Balfour  {>'). 

the  fourth,  to Wood  of  Balbigno,  in  the  county  of  Forfar  (/). 

Elizabeth,  the  fifth,  was  married  to  Wilham  Stewart,  at  that  time  son  and  heir- 
apparent  of  Thomas  Stewart  of  Grandtully  {g),  and  had  issue. 

(a)  History  Pitscotty,  page  147.  {h)  Charta  in  poblicis  archWis.  (f)  Charta  penes  Grant,  I  have 
5een,  in  1555,  and  likewise  from  the  Registers  of  Parliamem  in  1565.  (</)  Writs  to  this  gentleman, 
in  the  Registers  of  the  Piivy  Seal,  and  his  lady,  wherein  she  is  designed  sister-german  to  the  Earl  of 
Athol.  (f)  Balfour's  Collections,  title  Athol!  (/)  Balfour's  Collections,  title  Athol.  (j)  Charta 
155:. 


APPENDIX.  i-j^ 

Barbara,  the  sixth  and  youngest  daughter,  was  married  to  Robert  Menzics,  at 
that  time  ove  and  apparent  heir  of  James  Menzies  of  that  Ilk,  and  of  Weem  {a), 
and  had  issue. 

He  married  to  his  second  wife,  Janet,  daughter  of  John  Lord  Forbes  (b),  but  by 
her  he  had  no  issue  ;  and  dying  much  about  the  same  time  with  James  V.  in  the 
end  of  the  1542,  was  succeeded  by  his  only  son  and  heir, 

joHM,  the  fourth  earl  of  this  Ime  of  the  House  of  Athol,  who  was  young  at  his 
father's  death  :  There  is  nothing  to  be  met  with  in  history,  or  any  other  voucher 
that  I  have  had  access  to  see,  during  the  progress  of  the  reformation  of  religion, 
relating  to  him,  for,  being  strongly  attached  to  the  old  religion,  he  opposed  the 
new  settlement  all  he  could;  for  when  the  system  of  the  reformed  doctrine  was  to 
be  ratified,  and  to  receive  the  sanction  of  a  law  in  the  Parliament  1560,  this  earl, 
with  the  Lords  Borthwick  and  Somerville,  were  the  only  three  peers  who  dissented 
from  it  ;  they,  in  the  argument,  said  they  would  believe  as  their  fathers  had  dune 
before  them  (c). 

The  Earl  of  Athol  being  a  zealous  Roman  Catholtc,  it  is  like  enough  was 
none  of  the  least  motives  that  induced  the  queen,  in  the  1561,  to  call  him  to  her 
Privy  Council,  where  he  served  her  majesty  with  all  obsequioubuess  and  possible 
zeal :  He  for^vaided  all  he  could  the  marriage  betwixt  her  and  the  Lord  Darnly, 
and  perhaps  not  the  less  that  that  young  lord  had  been  papist,  professed  that  reli- 
gion, and  was  his  near  kinsman  and  namesake  too. 

About  this  time  her  majesty,  the  more  to  oblige  the  Earl  of  Athol,  and  to  tie 
him  to  her  interest,  was  pleased  to  give  him  a  commission  of  justiciary  in  the 
northern  part,  that  he  might  be  able  more  to  curb  and  to  overawe  his  powerful 
neighbours,  whose  loyalty  the  queen  had  at  that  time  begun  to  suspect  (rf}.  His 
lordship  was,  among  other  of  the  favourites,  present  at  the  baptism  of  the  prince 
King  James  VI.  after  the  popish  manner,  yet  was  never  questioned  for  it  as 
others  were :  The  reason  seems  to  be,  that  he  was  not  of  the  protestant  com- 
munion, else,  considering  the  zeal  of  the  times,  he  could  scarce  have  escaped  the 
censures  of  the  church  for  it. 

Shortly  after  this,  his  friend  King  Henry  being  barbarously  murdered  by  the 
Earl  of  Bothvvell  and  his  accomplices,  that  impious  fact  the  Earl  of  Athol  laid  ex- 
ceedingly to  heart  ;  and  though  he  was  and  still  continued  a  zealous  Roman  Ca- 
tholic, yet  was  among  the  most  forward  and  leading  of  all  the  nobility,  who 
started  his  suspicion,  that  the  Earl  of  Bothwell,  who  had  so  villanously  murdered 
the  father,  might  practise  the  same  impiety  upon  the  prince  the  son  ;  and  thereupon 
moved,  in  a  convention  of  the  nobility,  that  an  association  might  be  entered  into  for 
the  preservation  of  the  young  prince,  and  the  bringing  the  regicides  to  speedy  justice. 
But,  that  point  being  carried,  he  would  go  no  farther  length  with  the  associators ; 
for  Sir  James  Melville  says.  That  the  Earl  of  Athol  still  bore  a  great  love  to  the 
queen,  and  had  compassion  on  her  estate,  and  entered  into  the  enterprize  of  the 
association  only  for  the  safety  of  the  prince,  and  the  punishment  of  the  king's 
murder.  But  after  that  the  queen  was  induced  to  resign  the  crown,  as  weary  of 
the  pains  and  travail  of  government ;  and  desiring  that  in  her  lifetime  her  son 
might  be  placed  in  the  kingdom,  as  was  given  out,  the  Earl  so  far  concurred  in 
the  new  settlement,  that,  with  many  others  of  the  nobility,  he  entered  into  a 
bond  of  association,  wherein  they  promise  and  bind  themselves  to  assist  their  king, 
in  setting  him  on  the  throne,  and  putting  the  crown  on  his  head,  and  that  they 
shall  give  their  oaths  of  homage  and  dutiful  obedience  to  him  as  becomes  true 
subjects,  and  shall  concur  in  establishing  him  in  his  kingdom,  and  resist  all  such 
as  should  oppose  it  (^).  Besides  this  bond,  the  Elarl  of  Athol  entered  into  a 
second  bond  in  April  1569,  wherein  his  lordship  and  the  rest  of  the  subscribers 
did  not  only  acknowledge  the  young  prince's  authority,  but  likewise  the  authority 
of  the  Earl  of  Murray  as  regent. 

(a)  Cbarta  in  registro  Roberto  Meinzies  apparent!  heredi  et  nepoti  Jacob!  Meiiizies  de  Eodem,  et 
Earbarte  Staart  <ponsre  suae  sorori  germaiiae  Joannis  comitis  Atholas,  ad  annum  1556.  (i)  Charta  in 
publicis  archivis.  (c)  Archbishop  Spottiswood's  History  of  the  Church  of  Scotland,  {d)  Records  of 
Parliament  I  ;66.  (f)  Original  bond  in  the  Library  of  the  College  of  Glasgow,  and  published  by  Sir 
James  Dalrymple. 


,8o  APPENDIX. 

But  though  the  Earl  ofAthol  went  as  far  as  any  man  in  securing  the  prince, 
and  setthng  him  on  the  throne,  yet  he  could  never  be  induced  by  the  party  to  go 
oil  in  their  courses  in  defaming  the  queen,  a  thing  he  infinitely  abhorred,  as  dis- 
honourable to  the  nation  ;  for,  being  a  wise  man,  and  clearly  foreseeing  a  storm  a- 
gathering,  he  resolved  betimes  to  shelter  himself  in  a  voluntary  retreat,  and  there- 
upon withdrew  to  his  seat  in  the  country,  where  he  lived  in  great  splendour  ;  by 
which  he  enjoyed  the  greatest  tranquillity  of  any  great  man  in  the  kingdom, 
throughout  the  whole  boisterous  times  that  ensued,  till  the  king's  acceptation  of 
the  government  in  his  own  person  in  the  1577,  at  which  time  his  majesty  having, 
with  advice  of  the  nobility  and  estates,  named  a  new  Privy  Council,  his  Lordship 
was  called  to  the  board,  and  being  a  nobleman  of  most  accomplished  parts,  and 
much  valued  and  esteemed  by  the  party  who  guided  the  Court,  he  was  consti- 
tuted Lord  High  Chancellor.  His  acceptance  of  this  great  office  is  thus  entered 
in  the  council  records.  "  Stirling,  29th  March  1577.  The  which  day,  John  Earl 
"  of  Athole  being  nominate  and  elected  Cliancellor  of  the  Realm,  gaiff  his  aith,  in 
"  presence  of  the  King's  Majesty  and  Lords  of  Secret  Council,  for  due  and  lawful 
"  using  the  same  as  appertains,  as  he  would  answer  to  God  and  his  Highness,  upon 
"  his  charge  and  peril."  But  before  he  had  enjoyed  the  office  above  one  year, 
being  called  to  Stirling  to  settle  some  quarrels  among  the  friends  of  the  family  of 
Marr,  anent  the  custody  of  the  young  king,  and  the  government  of  Stirling  castle, 
which  the  king  had  resolved  to  have  removed  without  any  noise  ;  and  matters 
being  seemingly  adjusted,  the  old  Countess  of  Marr,  or  the  Earl  of  Morton  in  her 
name,  invited  the  Chancellor  to  an  entertainment;  while  they  were  drinking 
hard,  some  body  or  other  conveyed  a  deadly  poison  into  the  Chancellor's  glass,  of 
which  he  died  four  days  after,  24th  April  1579  •  Some  blamed  the  old  Countess  of 
Marr  for  it ;  others  suspected  the  Earl  of  Morton  at  the  bottom  of  it.  So  much  is 
certain,  his  friends  thought  he  had  got  foul  play,  that  they  sent  for  surgeons  to 
Edinburgh,  to  open  the  body  ;  and  though  they  declared  upon  oath  that  they 
found  no  mark  of  poison,  or  of  any  violence  done  to  the  deceased,  yet  the 
Countess  of  Athol  and  the  Earl  her  son  entered  a  protest,  that  the  trial  of  the 
coimcil  should  not  prejudge  the  criminal  process,  which  they  intended  before  the 
Justice-General.  He  was  on  the  4th  July  thereafter  interred  in  the  south  aisle  of 
St  Giles's  church  at  Edinburgh,  where  there  is  a  monument  erected  over  his 
grave  ;  on  the  head  of  the  tomb  there  is  placed  a  pelican  vulnerate  feeding  her 
young  with  her  blood,  the  emblem  of  affection  of  parents  to  children,  and  is  used 
as  a  device  here,  to  show  the  love  and  affection  this  noble  lord  ever  carried  to- 
wards his  country  ;  "  Ostendens,"  says  my  author,  "  ilium  fuisse  paratum  pro 
"  civium  salute  sanguinem  suum  profundere  (a)." 

The  Earl  of  Athol,  the  Chancellor,  married  first  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  George 
Earl  of  Huntly,  by  whom  he  had  two  daughters, 

Elizabeth,  who  was  married  to  Hugh  Lord  Eraser  of  Lovat,  next  to  Robert 
Earl  of  Lennox  and  March,  and  last  to  James  Stewart  Earl  of  Arran. 

Margaret,  to  George  Lord  Abernethy  of  Salton. 

He  married  to  his  second  wife,  Margaret,  daughter  of  Malcolm  Lord  Fleming, 
Lord  High  Chamberlain,  ancestor  to  the  Earl  of  Wigton,  by  whom  he  had  John 
his  heir  and  successor,  and  three  daughters. 

Grissel,  the  eldest  who  was  married  to  David  Earl  of  Crawford,  and  had 
issue. 

Je.\n,  the  second,  to  Sir  Duncan  Campbell  of  Glenorchy,  ancestor  to  the  Earl  of 
Breadalbane,  and  had  issue. 

Anne,  the  third  daughter,  to  Francis  Earl  of  Errol,  but  had  no  surviving  issue. 

To  John  Earl  of  Athol,  the  Lord  Chancellor,  succeeded  his  son  and  heir  John 
the  fifth  and  last  of  the  Earls  of  Athol  of  that  race  :  He  married  Mary  Ruthven, 
eldest  daughter  of  William  Earl  of  Gowrie,  who  was  Lord  Treasurer  in  the  reign 
of  King  James  VL  (b),  by  Dame  Dorothea  Stewart  his  wife,  daughter  of  Henry 
Lord  Methven  ;  he  had  two  sons,  who  both  died  in  their  infancy  (c),  and  four 
daughters,  who  were  his  heirs. 

(a)  Johnstoni  historia  rerum  Scoticarum.  {t)  Lives  of  Officers  of  State,  (c)  Sir  James  Balfour 
lemai-ks  this,  and  he  lived  near  the  time. 


APPENDIX.  lai 

Lady  Dorothea,  the  eldest,  who  was  married  to  WiUiani  the  second  Earl  of 
TuUibaidin,  and  had  issue. 

Lady  Ma.ry,  the  second,  to  James  Earl  of  Athol  and  Lord  Innermeth,  but  had 
no  succession. 

Lady  Jean,  the  third  daughter,  was  married  to  Henry  Stewart  Lord  St  Cohn. 
second  son  of  James  the  lirsc  Lord  Stewart  of  Doune,  and  brother  to  the  second 
Earl  of  Murray  of  that  line,  and  had  issue  (d),  and  again  to  Mr  Nicol  Ballenden  (^), 
but  had  no  issue. 

Lady  Anke,  the  fourth  and  youngest  daughter,  was  maiTied  to  Andrew,  Master  of 
Ochiltree,  son  and  heir  apparent  of  Andrew  Lord  Stewart  of  Ochiltree,  and  who  was 
himself  afterwards  created  Lord  Castleslewart  in  Ireland,  by  King  James  VI. 
the  9th  of  November  1619  (/),  and  left  a  daughter  his  heir,  Mary,  who  was  mar- 
ried to  Henry  Earl  of  Surtblk  of  the  kingdom  of  England  (^),  and  had  issue 
Henry  his  son  and  heir,  created  Earl  of  Bindon  and  baron  of  Chesterford  the  fifth 
of  (^leen  Anne. 

This  John,  the  fifth  and  last  of  that  race  of  the  Earls  of  Athol,  died  but  a  young 
man  in  his  lodgings  in  the  town  of  Perth  the  28th  day  of  August  of  the  year 
1594  (^h),  and  the  honour  came  to  be  at  the  disposal  of  the  kmg.  His  majesty 
Kmg  James  indeed  did  not  let  the  title  of  Earl  of  Athol  lie  any  time  dormant ; 
for,  in  less  than  a  year  after  the  last  earl's  demise,  he  was  graciously  pleased  to 
revive  it  again  in  the  person  of  John  Lord  Innermeth,  upon  a  recital  that  the 
earldom  of  Athol  had  fallen  back  to  the  crown,  by  the  death  of  John  Earl  of  Athol, 
without  heirs-male  ;  and  being  unwilhng  that  the  honour  should  extinguish,  and 
well  knowing  that  John  Lord  Innermeth  was  a  Stewart  of  the  same  blood  and 
kindred  with  the  former  Earls  of  Athol,  therefore  he  makes  and  creates  him  Earl 
of  Athol,  "  et  heredibus  mascuHs  de  corpore  suo  legitime  procreatis  sen  procreandis 
"  quibus  deticientibus  nobis  nostrisque  successoribus  libere  revertend.  (')."  The 
charter  or  patent  bears  date  the  6th  of  March  1595.  ^Ve  see  the  king  had  said  in 
the  patent,  that  he  knew  well  that  the  Lords  of  Innermeth  were  of  the  same  sur- 
name and  blood  of  the  Stewarts  with  the  House  of  Athol,  and  we  shall  show  it 
plainly  here,  by  connecting  this  new  earl  with  the  House  of  Lorn  ;  of  which 
family  we  made  it  evident,  that  Sir  James  Stewart,  the  Black  Knight  of  Lorn,  and 
the  ancestor  of  the  five  late  Earls  of  Athol,  was  son  to  Sir  John  Stewart  of  Inner- 
meth and  Lord  of  Lorn ;  that  he  had  an  elder  brother,  Robert  Stewart  of  Lorn, 
who  is  designed  simply  Robertus  Stuart  de  Lorn  (k),  and  is  thereafter  invested  in 
the  honour  of  Lord  Lorn,  by  King  James  I.  and  created  a  baron  and  lord  of  Par- 
liament (I).  John  Lord  Lorn  was  his  eldest  son,  who  resigns  his  estate  in  the 
hands  of  King  James  II.  and  obtains  from  him  a  new  charter,  bearing  date  the  20th 
of  June  1452,  "  dilecto  consanguineo  suo  Joanni  domino  Lorn,  de  toto  et  integro 
"  dominio  de  Lorn,  £tc.  Et  heredibus  suis  masculis,  de  corpore  suo  legitime 
"  procreatis  seu  procreandis,  quibus  forte  deficientibus  ^Valter  Stuart  fratri  suo 
"  germano  ;"  which  failing,  to  John,  Allan,  and  James,  all  his  brothers  ;  all  which 
failing,  to  several  other  collateral  heirs-male  nominatim,  and  to  the  heirs-male  of 
their  bodies  respective  fmj.  This  Lord  Lorn  died  without  issue-male,  and  left 
three  daughters,  Isabel,  who  was  married  to  Colin  the  first  Earl  of  Argyle,  Mar- 
garet to  Sir  Colin  Campbell  of  Glenorchy,  and  Mariota,  the  third,  to  Arthur 
Campbell  of  Ottar,  who  were  both  sons  of  Sir  Duncan  Campbell  of  Lochow : 
By  a  subsequent  agreement  betwixt  the  heirs  of  line  and  Walter  Lord  Lorn 
the  heir-male,  he  resigns  to  the  Earl  of  Argyle  his  dominium  de  Lorn,  and  in 
lieu  of  that  he  gets  the  barony  of  Innermeth  («),  and  changes  his  title  of  Lord 
Lorn  to  Lord  Innermeth  ;  for  there  is  a  charter  in  the  roUs,  whereby  he  is  so 
designed  :  IValterus  Dominus  Innermeath  resigns   the   barony  of  Lorn  in   favour  of 

(d)  All  this  is  instructed  from  unquestionable  vouchers  out  of  the  registers,  (f)  Charta  in  reglstro 
1617.  (/)  All  this  is  instructed  and  vouched  from  writs  in  the  registers  relating  to  the  year  1615  and 
1617,  and  Camden's  Annals,  who  marks  the  day  that  he  was  created  Lord  Castlestewart.  (y)  Peerage 
of  England,  title  Suffolk,  p.  192.  («)  Charta  in  registro.  (/)  In  the  registers  of  the  Privy  Seal  in  the 
high  Parliament-house,  book  6.  charta  130.  (f)  In  the  black  acts  of  Parliament,  fol.  23.  (/)  There 
is  a  ciiarter  by  King  James  II.  to  John  Cathcart  of  the  lands  of  Bartonholm,  the  5th  of  September  1439, 
in  which  Robertus  Dominus  Lorn,  simply  so  designed,  is  a  witness.  (/«)  This  charter  is  recorded  in  the 
4th  Book  of  Charters  in  the  registers  of  the  Great  Seal,  charta  ]  76.  (n)  This  is  instructed  and  vouched 
by  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal  in  the  archives,  to  Colin  Earl  of  Argyle,  of  the  lands  of  Kippen,  on 
the  resignation  of  Walter  Lord  Lorn,  the  20th  April  1466. 

Vol.  n.  6  G 


jb.  APPENDIX. 

Colin  Earl  of  Argyle,  the  27th  of  April  1470  Co  J.  This  Walter  Lord  Innermetli. 
brother  and  heir-male  of  John  Lord  Lorn,  married  Margaret,  daughter  of  John 
Lord  Lindsay  of  the  Byres,  ancestor  to  the  Earl  of  Crawford  fpj,  and  had  Thoma'. 
Lord  Inneriiieth,  his  son  and  heir,  who  was  slain  at  the  battle  of  Flodden  f/jj, 
leaving  issue  by  Dame  Janet  Keith  his  wife,  daughter  of  William  Earl  Marischal 
CrJ,  widow  of  John,  Master  of  Rothes,  Richard  his  son  and  heir,  and  a  daughter, 
Marion,  who  was  married  to  Patrick  Ogilvie  of  Inchmartin,  paternal  ancestor  to 
the  present  Earl  of  Findlater  fsj. 

Richard  Lord  Inncrmeth,  his  son,  married  Margaret,  daughter  of  John  Lord 
Lindsay  of  the  Byres  ft  J,  and  he  dying  in  the  1528  fuj,  was  succeeded  by 

John  Lord  Innermeth,  his  son,  who  married  Elizabeth  Bethune,  daughter  of  Sir 
John  Bethune  of  Creigh  ;  she  had  been  one  of  King  James  V.'s  mistresses,  and  had 
born  him  a  daughter,  Lady  Jean,  who  was  Countess  of  Argyle  (^■yj ;  by  her  he  had 
James  his  eldest  son  and  successor. 

John  Stewart  of  Lethers. 

Alexander. 

This  James,  the  next  Lord  Innermeth,  married  fii-st  Helen,  daughter  to  the 
Lord  Gray,  and  again  Jean  Ogilvie,  daughter  of  James  Lord  Ogilvie,  and  had 
John  his  successor,  and  three  daughters ;  Margaret,  who  was  married  to  Sir  Wil- 
liam Ruthven  of  Bandon,  and  was  grandmother  of  that  renowned,  brave,  military 
man,  Patrick  Ruthven  Earl  of  Forth  and  Brentford  in  England,  who  served  in  the 
quality  of  Lieutenant-General  under  Gustavus  Adolphus  King  of  Sweden,  and  in 
the  same  quality  under  his  majesty  King  Charles  I.  in  the  civil  war  in  England; 
Janet  to  Alexander  Cumin  of  Coulter  fwj;  and  Grizel  to  Sir  Thomas  Gordon  of 
Clunie  fxj. 

John  Lord  Innermeth  married  Margaret,  daughter  of  Sir  David  Lindsay,  who 
was  Earl  of  Crawford,  sister  to  Sir  David  Lindsay  of  Edziell,  and  to  Mr  John 
Lindsay  of  Balcarras,  Secretary  of  State  to  King  James  VI.  and  was,  upon  the 
death  of  John  the  fifth  Earl  of  Athol,  created  Earl  of  Athol,  as  has  been  ob- 
served formerly  in  these  memoirs  the  6th  of  March  1595  ;  by  this  lady  he  had  issue 
James  his  heir  and  successor,  and  a  daughter,  Margaret,  who  was  married  to  Sir 
James  Stewart  of  Belliechan  fjj'  ^i^d  again  to  Sir  Robert  Crichton  of  Clunie  (z), 
and  had  issue.  Tliis  John  Lord  Innermeth  and  Earl  of  Athol  married  to  his  se- 
cond wife  Dame  Mary  Ruthven,  daughter  of  William  Earl  of  Gowrie,  widow  and 
relict  of  John  the  fifth  and  last  Earl  of  Athol,  by  whom  he  had  no  issue  {a),  and 
dying  on  the  5th  of  April  1615  {h),  was  succeeded  by 

James  Earl  of  Athol,  and  Lord  Innermeth  his  son,  who  married  Mary,  second 
daughter  of  John  the  fifth  Earl  of  Athol,  but  dying  without  issue  about  the  1625, 
the  honour  of  Earl  of  Athol  became  a  second  time  extinct ;  but  was  quickly  again 
revived  by  King  Charles  I.  in  favour  of  John  Earl  of  Tullib<irdin,  son  and  heir 
of  Dorothea  Countess  of  TuUibardin,  eldest  daughter  and  heir  of  line  of  John  the 
tifth  Earl  of  Athol,  by  letters  patent  dated  at  Whitehall  the  17th  of  February 
1629  (f.) 

Having  thus  run  through  in  a  cursory  manner  all  the  different  families,  and  all 
the  illustrious  persons  that  have  at  different  times  enjoyed  the  dignity  of  Earl  of 
Athol,  it  will  be  but  just  and  equitable  that  we  give  as  full  an  account  of  the 
most  noble  family  of  the  Murrays,  who  now  possess  the  honour  under  the  title  of 
Duke  of  Athol,  as  we  have  done  of  the  others,  both  with  respect  to  their  high  an- 
tiquities, their  dignities  and  honours,  their  noble  and  illustrious  descent  and  al- 
liances ;  which  we  shall  proceed  to  do  with  as  great  brevity  as  is  consistent  with  a 
memorial  of  this  kind. 

ro)  In  the  registers  of  the  Great  Seal,  book  8.  chart.  289.  (/»)  Charta  in  publicis  archivis  ad  annum  1 48 1 . 
[(/)  From  writs  I  have  seen  and  perused,  (r)  Charta  in  regist.  ad  annum  1505.  (/)  Officers  of  State,  title 
Cliancellors  and  Findlater.  (/)  Account  of  the  House  of  Innermeth  and  the  records.  (»)  Gift  of  the 
ward  of  Richard  Lord  Innermeth,  and  the  marriage  of  John  Lord  Innermeth,  to  the  Laird  of  Lundie, 
in  the  registers.  (_v)  Registers  of  Parliament,  {w)  Charta  in  publicis  archivis  ad  annum  1587.  (.r)  Ge- 
nealogy of  the  Gordons,  MSS.  (j)  Ibidem,  ad  annum  15S9.  Ca)  The  instruction  of  this  is  in  the  Ap- 
pendix to  Mr  Nisbet's  Heraldry.  («)  Balfour's  Collections  in  Bibl.  Jutid.  (h)  Ibidem,  (^c)  Register 
nf  the  Great  Seal,  book  22.  numb.   i8S. 

2 


APPENDIX.  185 


MURRAY  Earls,  Marqiusses,  and  Duk.es  of  ATHOL. 

All  antiquaries  are  agreed  that  the  common  ancestor  of  this  most  noble  and  far 
spread  family  of  the  Murray s  derive  themselves  from  one  Friskintis,  a  gentleman 
of  note  and  figure  in  the  reign  of  King  David  I.  who  came  to  the  throne  on  the 
demise  of  his  brother  King  Alexander  1.  anno  1122.  Nobody  can  pretend,  with 
any  kind  of  certainty,  to  trace  his  origin  or  to  show  his  descent ;  but  if  1  may  be 
allowed,  at  this  distance,  to  offer  my  own  conjecture,  and  1  deliver  it  as  no  other, 
I  apprehend  that  he  was,  or  might  be,  one  of  those  Saxon  nobles,  who,  with  Cos- 
patnck  and  Arkil,  the  true  and  genuine  ancestors  of  the  great  families  of  the  Earls 
of  Dunbar  and  Lennox,  fled  to  Scotland,  upon  the  conquest  of  England,  or  a  little 
after  it,  and  were  graciously  received  by  our  kings,  and  rewarded,  suitably  to  their 
birth  and  merit,  with  lands  and  territories,  and  from  whence  they,  or  their  im- 
mediate successors,  assumed  surnames:  However,  so  much  is  most  certain,  that 
this  Friskiiuis,  from  an  authentic  voucher  of  no  less  authority  than  a  charter  un- 
der the  Great  Seal  of  King  William  the  Lion,  held  of  the  crown  in  the  time  of 
King  David  his  grandfather,  the  lands  of  Strabork  in  Linlithgowshire,  the  lands 
of  Duffus,  Rosslle,  S^c.  in  the  shire  of  Murray  (fl).  He  had  two  sons,  as  plain  as 
a  demonstration,  William  and  Hugo,  wlw  are  both  designed  patronymically  IVilliel- 
mus  fiUus  Fiiskini,  and  Huso  filius  Friskini  (Jb),  who  is  certainly  the  ancestor  of  the 
family  of  Sutherland,  as  is  plainly  vouched  from  the  chartulary  of  the  Episcopal 
See  of  Murray  in  the  Lawyers'  Library;  for  both  the  surname  of  Murray,  the  de- 
scendants of  William  the  son  of  Friskin,  and  the  family  of  Sutherland,  the  de- 
scendants of  Hugh  the  son  of  Friskin,  carry  one  and  the  same  coat  of  arms,  three 
stars;  the  difference  in  the  tincture  makes  no  alteration,  but  is  only  the  invention 
of  latter  times  among  heralds,  to  distinguish  one  family  from  another  who  carry 
the  same  figures  in  their  achievement  and  coat,  not  to  be  well  distinguished  but 
by  difterencing  the  colour  of  the  field.  William,  the  son  of  Friskin,  designed  only 
by  the  christian  name  of  his  father,  I ViUielmus  filius  Friskini,  gets  from  King  Wil- 
liam a  charter  of  the  lands  of  Strabork,  Duftus,  Rossile,  Inchikel,  Macher  and 
Kintrai,  "  quas  terras  pater  suus  Friskin  tenuit  tempore  regis  David  avi  mei,"  says 
the  king.  The  charter  has  no  precise  date,  but  it  must  be  betwixt  the  year  1168 
and  the  1171;  for  Felix  Bishop  of  Murray  is  witness  to  the  king's  deed;  in  the 
1 168  he  was  promoted  to  the  Episcopal  See  of  Murray,  and  died  in  the  office  anno 
1171(c). 

This  gentleman,  William,  the  son  of  Friskin,  Willielmus  filius  Friskini,  as  he  de- 
signs himself,  seems  to  have  been  a  very  corisiderable  man  in  the  court  of  King  Mal- 
colm IV.  He  is  witness  to  the  charter  of  that  king  to  Banvald.  Flandrense  of  the 
lands  of  Innes,  and  is  witness  to  the  chai'ter  granted  by  King  William  of  the  lands 
of  Burgin  to  the  abbey  of  Kinloss. 

WiLLi.wi,  the  third  of  the  line,  his  son,  is  the  first  that  assumes  the  surname 
de  Moravia,  for  he  is  designed  IMllielmus  de  Moravia  filius  IVillielmi  filii  Friskini, 
in  a  deed,  whereby  he  gives  in  pure  and  perpetual  alms,  "  Deo  et  ecclesia;  sancttt 
"  trinitatis  de  Spiny  et  collegio  canonicorom  ibidem  Deo  servientium  ecclesiam 
"  de  Artendol  cum  pertinentiis  suis  coram  Hugone  fratre  meo."  The  reason,  I 
apprehend,  why  this  William,  the  son  of  William  the  son  of  Friskin,  assumed  the 
surname  de  Moravia  from  the  country  of  Murray,  was,  because  he  had  a  great 
estate  and  vast  possessions,  and  had  his  residence  at  Duffus  there.  Hu^o  (tf  Mo- 
ravia was  his  eldest  son;  for,  in  the  chartulary  of  the  See  of  Murray  there  is  an 
agreement  betwixt  Archibald  Bishop  of  Murray  and  Walter  de  Moravia  filius 
quondam  dominl  Hugonis  de  Moravia,  of  a  part  of  the  wood  and  muir  of  Spynie, 
which  his  father  had  from  Brunus  Bishop  of  Murray,  "  qui  ducit  ad  castellam  de 
"  Duffus,"  in  the  1226.     This  IValter  de  Moravia,  and  Dominus  de  Duffus,  had  for 

(a)  The  original  charter  I  have  seen,  and  copied  it  from  the  original  in  the  custody  of  Dame  Katharine 
Stewart  Lady  Cardross,  who  was  proprietor  of  the  lands  of  Strabork,  as  is  also  her  son,  the  present  Earl 
of  Buchan,  who  has  still  the  charter  in  his  charter-chest.  (J?)  As  from  a  voucher  in  the  chartulary  of 
Murray  by  Robert  Bishop  of  St  Andrews,     (c)  Chron.  de  Melrose. 


i8.|  APPENDIX. 

certain  Friskin  de  MonrSia  Dominus  de  Diiffus,  his  son,  wiio  is  so  designed  in  cm 
agreement  about  the  bounding  of  lands  with  the  Bishop  of  Murray  in  the  1248  («); 
he  had  no  male  issue,  and  his  estate  both  in  tlie  south  and  in  the  west  came  to  his 
two  daughters,  who  -.vere  co-heirs,  Helen,  who  was  married  to  Sir  Reginald  If 
Chien,  and  Christian,  to  I'Villiam  de  Feddetetb  {!>).  This  Sir  Friskin  de  Moravia 
is  witness,  together  with  Sir  Malcolm  de  Moravia,  in  a  charter  I  have  seen  (r), 
granted  by  Malise  Earl  of  Strathern  to  Annabella  his  sifter,  of  the  lands  of  Kin- 
cardine, which  is  confirmed  by  King  Alexander  II.  at  Selkirk,  the  28th  of  June, 
the  22d  year  of  the  king's  reign,  that  is  the  year  of  our  Lord  1233.  This  Sir 
Malcolm  Murray  is  by  some  thought  to  be  brother  to  this  Sir  Friskin  Murray  of 
Duffus,  witnessing  the  Earl  of  Strathern's  charter  with  him.  Others  again  think 
he  was  uncle  to  this  Sir  Friskin,  son  to  Sir  IVilliam  de  Moravia  oi  Duifus;  how- 
ever this  be,  he  is  very  early  branched  from  the  stem,  and  is  uncontrovertibly  the 
original  ancestor  of  the  most  noble  and  illustrious  family  of  the  Murrays  of  Tulli- 
bardin.  He  has  for  certain  had  a  considerable  estate  in  the  county  of  Perth ;  for 
ill  I  he  36th  of  Alexander  III.  he,  dominus  Malcohnus  de  Moravia,  miles,  vicecomes 
de  Perth,  is  witness  to  a  charter  granted  by  Malesius  comes  de  Strathern,  domino 
Malcolmo  de  Logie  fdio  quondam  domini  Malesii  senescalli  de  Strathern  de  terris  de 
Catintulloch  ;  to  the  charter  Alexander  comes  de  Buchan  justiciarius  Scotia  is  a  wit- 
ness {d).  By  an  account  of  the  family  I  have  seen,  drawn  up  in  the  year  i6oo, 
and  to  give  it  the  greater  authority,  it  makes  mention  of  some  charters  and  writs 
of  the  family  that  1  found  exactly  corresponding  when  I  had  the  honour  to  peruse 
the  Duke  of  Athol's  writs  of  the  family  of  Tullibardin  in  the  1711;  I  say  this 
draught  of  the  family  mentions  that  Sir  Malcolm  de  Moravia,  the  certain  and  un- 
ijontroverted  ancestor  of  the  House  of  Tullibardin,  got  the  lands  of  Gask  and 
others  in  the  county  of  Perth,  by  the  marriage  of  the  daughter  and  heirof.S»- 
Gilbert  de  Gask.  I  have  seen  myself  this  gentleman  mentioned  in  ancient  writs,  in 
the  charter-chest  of  the  family  of  Abercairny,  and  that  Sir  Gilbert  had  a  sister 
called  Issenda,  who  was  Countess  of  Strathern;  so  much  however  is  most  certain, 
that  Gask  was  very  anciently  in  possession  of  the  family  of  Tullibardin,  and  some- 
times they  used  that  title.  Sir  David  Murray,  one  of  the  ancestors  of  the  Duke  of 
Athol,  is  designed  David  de  Moravia  de  Cask,  in  a  charter  by  Euphemia  Comitissa 
de  Strathern,  to  Luke  Stirling,  one  of  the  ancestors  of  the  family  of  Keir  of  the 
lands  of  Rattcrn,  in  the  141 1  {e),  and  he  is  designed  by  the  title  of  Gask,  by  our 
learned  historian  Dr  John  Major,  as  one  of  those  illustrious  persons  who  were 
knighted  by  King  James  I.  for  the  greater  splendour  of  his  coronation  at  Perth, 
anno  1424.  As  we  are  certain,  from  undoubted  vouchers,  that  Sir  Malcolm  Mur- 
ray had  an  estate  in  Perthshire,  in  the  reign  of  King  Alexander  II.  that  he  exe- 
cuted the  office  of  High-sheriff  there  in  the  reign  of  King  Alexander  III.  so  we 
are  as  sure  from  unquestionable  records,  charters  in  the  family,  that  he  gave  to 
Sir  IVilliam  de  Moravia,  his  son,  WHUelmo  de  Moravia  fdio  suo  terras  de  Lama- 
hude,  by  a  charter  which  is  in  the  hands  of  his  Grace  the  Duke  of  Athol  (/),  An- 
dreas Episcopus  Moravia,  Willielmus  de  Hayia  de  Locherward  ^5*  Michael  de  Weems, 
militibus,  being  witnesses  thereto.  The  charter  is  without  date,  as  is  very  usual  in 
the  more  ancient  deeds,  but  it  must  be  before  the  1244  that,  from  the  Chronicle  of 
Melrose,  this  prelate,  Andrew  Bishop  of  Murray,  died. 

This  same  noble  and  illustrious  person,  Willielmus  de  Moravia,  miles,  filius 
quondam  domini  Malcolmi  de  Moravia,  militis,  got  and  obtained  the  lands  and 
estataof  Tullibardin,  in  the  county  of  Perth,  by  the  marriage  of  Adda,  daughter  of 
Maine  Senescal  de  Strathern,  by  Mauriele,  his  wife,  daughter  and  heir  of  Congal 
Jilius  Duncani,  Jilii  Malcolmi.  There  is,  in  the  custody  of  his  Grace  the  Duke  of 
Athol,  a  charter  of  King  Alexander  II.  under  the  Great  Seal,  ratifying  and  con- 
lirming  a  former  deed  and  grant  by  Robertas  comes  de  Strathern,  Congal  Jilio  Dun- 
cani, filio  Malcolmi  de  illis  terris  in  villa  de  Chacherlanuch  qua  dicitur  Tullibardin, 
and  bears  date  the  3d  of  April,  the  20th  year  of  the  king's  reign,  that  is  the  year 

i^a)  Chartulary  of  Murray.  (A)  Ibidem.  (f)  In  the  hands  of  the  Duke  of  Montrose.  (</)  Sir 
James  Balfour's,  Lord  Lyon's  Collections  in  Bibl.  Jurid.  (f)  The  original  charter  I  have  seen  in  the 
Kands  of  the  Laird  of  Keir.        (/^  In  the  charter-chest  of  the  family,  which  I  have  seen. 


APPENDIX.  rS^. 

1231,  to  which  deed  Bishop  Bondington  of  Glasgow,  the  Chancellor,  is  a  witness. 
Sir  William  got  also  a  ratilication  ot'  the  charter  of  the  lands  and  estate  of  Tiilli- 
bardin  from  his  lady's  brother,  Henricus  filius  quondam  domini  Mnlesii  Scnescalli  de 
St-.itheni,  whereby  he  confirms  for  him  and  his  heirs,  "  illam  donationem  quam 
"  domina  IVIauriela  mater  mea  filia  Congal  dedit  et  concessit  domino  Willielmo  do 
"  Moravia,  filio  domini  Malcolmi  de  Moravia,  et  Add;e  fdiK  dicta;  domins  Mauriehe, 
"  sororis  mea:  de  TuUibardin,  secundum  tenorem  chartas  quam  dictus  dominus 
"  Willielmus,  et  Adda  soror  mea  habent  de  predicta  Mauriela  matre  mea.  Apud 
"  Duftaly  die  Martis  in  Vigilia  omnium  sanctorum,  anno  Domini  millesimo  du- 
"  centesimo  octogesimo  quarto  (/;). 

Upon  the  death  of  Queen  Margaret,  the  grandchild  and  heir  of  ^ing  Alexan- 
der UL  anno  1 290,  when  the  competition  arose  about  the  right  of  succession  to  the 
crown  betwixt  John  Baliol  and  Robert  Bruce,  the  decision  and  determination 
whereof  was,  by  both  parties,  referred  to  King  Edward  I.  of  England.  The  whole 
country,  as  usual  upon  such  occasions,  and  in  the  like  cases,  sided  and  attached 
themselves  to  the  different  rivals;  Sir  William  Murray  of  TuUibardin,  or  Tholy- 
bardin,  as  the  record  my  voucher  calls  him  {b),  took  part  with  John  Baliol,  and,  be- 
ing a  person  of  character  and  figure,  was  one  of  those  barons  that  went  to  Berwick, 
the  place  of  meeting,  for  giving  decision  in  the  point  for  supporting  his  claim,, 
and  where  he  gave  his  oath  of  feiilty  and  subjection  to  King  Edward,  as  direct  and 
superior  lord  of  Scotland  (i);  but  in  this  Sir  William  Murray  was  not  alone,  for 
even  the  competitors  themselves,  the  very  guardians  of  Scotland,  and  indeed  all- 
the  Scotsmen  about  him,  did  the  like.  The  King  of  England's  decision,  in  favours 
of  John  Baliol,  could  not  but  be  very  agreeable  to  Sir  William  Murray,  who  had 
so  strenuously  asserted  his  preferable  right  and  title,  and  submitted  to  him  as  king, 
when  the  crown  of  Scotland  was  adjudged  to  belong  to  him,  on  the  19th  November 
1292  {d).  Two  years  after  this,  anno  1294,  a  war  breaking  out  between  England 
and  France,  King  Edward  thinking  himself  assured  of  all  the  assistance  the  king 
and  kingdom  of  Scotland  could  give  him,  at  least  he  flattered  himself  so  far  as  to 
think  they  would  not  at  once  disobey  his  commands,  and  baulk  his  intreaty,  for 
he  made  use  of  both,  and  on  the  29th  of  June  of  the  year  1294,  aforesaid,  he  sent 
firom  Portsmouth  no  less  than  fifteen  distinct  letters  to  King  John  himself,  and  to 
others  of  the  first  rank  and  quality  in  Scotland,  and  among  others  to  Sir  William 
Murray  of  TuUibardin  (, ) ;  all  of  whom  he  required,  upon  their  allegiance,  and  in- 
treated  as  his  friends,  to  come  in  person,  if  they  possibly  could,  to  London, 
with  their  men,  horses,  and  arms,  and  to  be  ready  on  the  first  day  of  September 
next  to  go  over  with  him  to  France,  in  order  to  assist  him  in  the  recovering  of  his 
province  of  Gascony.  But  by  this  time  the  Scots  nation  were  grown  weary  of  their 
superior  King  Edward,  and  did  not  hke  the  encroachments  he  had,  by  fraud,  force, 
and  violence,  made  upon  their  constitution  and  independency  ;  so  that  his  sum- 
monses, by  this  time,  were  but  little  regarded,  for  they  did  not  think  themselves 
bound  to  keep  oaths  violently  extorted  from  them  by  so  eminent  an  invader  of  their 
hberties  and  independency.  What  became  of  Sir  William  Murray  of  TuUibardin 
after  this,  or  what  part  he  acted  in  the  calamitous  war  that  soon  after  this  ensued, 
for  want  of  vouchers  to  direct  me,  I  cannot  tell,  and  at  this  distance  I  will  not 
offer  any  conjecture.  I  observe,  from  Mr  Rymer's  Fadeiri,  and  Prynne's  Collec- 
tions, there  were  really  more  gentlemen  of  the  surname  of  Murray,  even  at  that 
time,  with  territorial  designations,  than  of  any  other  family  whatsoever;  for  there 
is  this  Sir  William  Murray  of  TuUibardin,  Sir  William  Murray  of  Drumsargard, 
and  Sir  Andrew  INIurray  of  Bothwell,  who  I  look  upon  to  be  all  near  relations  to 
one  another,  and  of  the  same  blood  and  kindred,  though,  for  want  of  proper  re- 
cords, the  particular  relation  cannot  be  condescended  on,  or  instructed.  By  Dame 
Adda,  his  wife  aforesaid,  Sir  William  Murray  had  a  son, 

Andrew,  his  son  and  heir,  who  gave  in  pure  and  perpetual  alms  to  the  monks 
of  Inchaffry,  usually  designed  Insula  Missarum,  a  certain  annuity  out  of  a  part  of 

(a)  Penes  ducem  de  Athole.  (4)  Rymer  :ind  Prynne.  (c)  Rymer.  (</)  Ibidem.  (_e)  Rymer'.'; 
Foedera  Angliae  ad  annum  1 294. 

Vol.  II.  6  H 


iS6  APPENDIX. 

his  lands  of  Tullibardin,  which  had  been  formerly  in  dispute  betwixt  him  and  the 
abbot  and  convent  ;  and  this  he  expiesses  for  the  health  of  his  soul,  St-c.  This 
movtiticution  bears  date  the  i6th  of  December,  Saint  Beaun's  day,  of  the  year 
i^:?!  (a).  This  gentleman,  upon  the  incoming  of  Edward  Baliol  in  the  1332, 
vvah  one  of  those  who  had  got  into  the  notion  that  he  still  had  a  better  and  nearer 
title  to  the  crown  than  the  Bruce  family  in  proximity  of  blood,  and  for  that  rea- 
son he  did  not  oppose  him,  but  rather  seemed  to  favour  the  attempt  he  was 
making  to  recover  his  crown :  He  did  not  indeed  join  his  army,  but  he  caused,  or 
suUered,  some  of  his  dependants  to  fix  a  stake  in  the  river  of  Ern,  where  it  was  most 
fordable  ;  which,  it  seems,  was  the  signal  that  had  been  concerted  on  to  let  the 
enemy  marcl^  over  in  order  to  attack  the  Scots  that  lay  encamped  at  Duplin;  the. 
stratagem  had  all  the  success  that  could  be  desired,  the  Scots  army  were  secure, 
not  dreaming  any  enemy  was  near  them,  and  were  very  disadvantageously  attack- 
ed before  they  could  scarce  get  to  their  arms,  and  a  very  bloody  battle  ensued,  iu 
which  Edward  Baliol,  pretender  to  the  crown,  had  the  better,  and  upon  that  was 
crowned  at  Scone ;  but  the  very  next  year,  things  taking  a  more  favourable  tura 
for  King  David,  and  the  Scots,  after  a  long  siege,  having  made  themselves  masters, 
of  the  town  of  Perth,  many  prisoners  were  taken,  and  among  others  this  gentle- 
man, who,  being  indicted,  tried,  and  condemned,  for  high  treason,  suffered  accord- 
ingly. I  am  very  far  out  in  my  conjecture  if  this  gentleman's  death  was  not  re- 
venged very  severely  by  the  English  ;  for,  without  any  visible  cause.  Sir  John 
Graham  the  Earl  of  Monteith,  who  was  taken  prisoner  at  the  battle  of  Durham, 
was  executed  at  Westminster  as  a  traitor  to  the  crown  of  England,  because  in  the 
crowd  of  other  Scotsmen  he  had  sworn  fealty  to  King  Edward  of  England.  I 
have  a  long  while  thought  this  eavl's  death  was  a  kind  of  reprisal  for  the  death  of 
Sir  Andrew  Murray  of  Tullibardin,  who  lost  his  life  in  supporting  the  interest  of  a 
pretender,  which  the  crown  of  England  had  exerted  its  full  strength  to  have  esta- 
blished on  the  throne.  He  left  a  son.  Sir  William  Murray  of  Tullibardin,  who, 
alter  the  death  of  his  father,  had  a  charter  from  Mahse,  then  Earl  of  Strathern^ 
his  superior,  of  his  estate  of  Tulhbardin,  on  the  resignation  of  Adda  de  Moravia 
avia  dicti  IViIliehni.  In  this  deed  Sir  IVilliam  de  Montijixo  justiciarius  Scotia  ex 
parte  boreali  aqux  de  forth,  is  a  witness,  who  executed  that  office  in  the  1335, 
&c.  (Z.). 

This  William  was  succeeded  by  John  de  Moravia  de  Tullibardin,  who  had  a 
grant  from  Sir  Alexander  de  Abernethy,  miles,  de  terris  de  Pekerling  in  Baronia  de 
Banhrich,  in  vicecomitatu  de  Fife.     He  was  succeeded  by 

Walterus  de  Moravia  de  Tullibardin,  who,  in  the  1358,  upon  Robert  the 
Great  Steward  of  Scotland's  coming  to  be  Comes  de  Strathern,  he  grants  a  charter 
IValtero  de  Moravia  de  terris  de  Tullibardin  IS  Concusse  :  and  King  David,  in  the 
53d  year  of  his  reign,  by  a  charter  uixier  the  Great  Seal,  ratifies  and  confirms 
"  Chartam  quas  dilectus  nepos  noster  Robertus  Comes  de  Strjthern,  senescallus 
"  Scotite  fecit  et  concessit  Waltero  de  Moravia  de  TuUibardine,  de  terris  de  Tulli- 
"  bardine  et  Concusse,  ac  etiam  chartam  quam  quondam  Alexander  Abernethy, 
"  miles,  fecit  Joanni  de  Moravia  de  Tullibarduie,  de  terris  de  Pekerling  in  baronia 
"  de  Banbrich  in  vicecomitatu  de  Fife."  This  charter  is  in  the  registers  of  the 
Great  Seal,  anno  1362.  This  same  Walterus  de  Moravia  de  TuUibardine  gave  to 
the  monastery  of  St  Servan  of  Culross,  "  et  monachis  ibidem,  deo  servientibus, 
"  totas  terras  suas  de  Aldton,  pro  salute  anirai  sui  et  Maigaretae  sponsse  sua,  paren- 
"  turn,  progenitorum,  et  successorum,  suorum.  Testibus,  Walterus  episcopus  Dun- 
"  blanen.  Johannes  abbas  de  Dunfermling,  dominus  Thomas  Bisset  dominus  de 
"  Fife,  Robertus  de  Erskine  dominus  ejusdem,  Andreas  de  Valoniis,  militibus, 
"  Allanus  de  Erskine,  Robertus  senescallus  de  Innermeath,  Michael  de  BaLtbur, 
"  Robertus  Hakyth  et  multis  allis."  This  charter,  though  it  wants  a  date,  yet  the 
time  may  be  easily  fixed,  since  Thomas  Bisset  is  a  witness,  who  had  married  the 
Lady  Isabel,  the  daughter  and  heir  of  Duncan  Earl  of  Fife,  and,  upon  that,  came 
t.o  be  designed  Dominus  de  Fife,  for  we  know  exactly  when  the  marriage  happened, 

(a)  Chartulary  of  Inchaffiy,  I  had  the  use  of  from  Mr  Maurice  Murray,  brother  to  Abercairny. 
(b)  This  charier  I  had  the  honour  to  peruse  in  the  charter-chest  of  the  family  of  Athol. 


APPENDIX.  187 

£rom  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal  of  King  EKivid,  confirming  a  marriage-settle- 
ment, inter  Dominum  'L'homum  Bisset  iH  habellam  de  Fife  dominuni  ejusdem,  dated  the 
loth  January  1362  («),  and  another  in  the  8th  of  June  the  same  year,  1362.  After 
the  marriage  took  place,  there  is  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal,  "  Domino  Thomse 
"  Bisset,  de  toto  et  integro  comitatu  de  Fife,  et  ha^redibus  suis  masculis  inter  ipsum 
"  et  Isabellam  de  Fife  legitime  procreandis;"  so  that  the  precise  date  of  this  charter 
of  mortification  is  in  the  year  1362;  it  is  afterwards  confirmed  to  the  abbot  and 
convent  of  Culross  by  king  Robert  III.  at  Dunfermline,  the  20th  March,  the  first 
year  of  his  reign,  anno  1390  {b).  From  the  writs  of  the  family  it  appears,  that 
this  Walter  Murray  of  Tullibardin  was  married  to  Margaret  le  Baird,  as  she  is  de- 
signed, who  was  of  the  ancient  family  of  the  Bairds  of  Camnethan,  in  the  county 
of  Lanark,  where  they  had  long  continued  in  lustre.  By  this  lady  he  had  a  son, 
his  heir  and  successor. 

Sir  David  Murray,  designed  first  of  Gask,  and  then  of  Tullibardin,  as  we  have 
observed  in  these  memoirs.  He  is  designed  David  de  Moravia  de  Gask,  in  a  char- 
ter granted  by  Euphame  Countess  Palatine  of  Stratlian,  Luce  de  Strivelyn  de  terris 
de  Rathern ;  it  is  dated  at  Penh  the  bth  of  November  1414  ;  to  which  there  are 
witnesses,  Roberttis  smcscallus  Comes  de  Fife,  et  de  Monteitij,  gubernator  regni  Scotia, 
PValterus  senescallus  Comes  Athole  tJi  Caithtiess,  iViUiehiuis  Domimis  Graham,  Joan- 
nes de  IVeems  dominus  ejusdem,  tnilitibus,  David  de  Moravia  de  Gask,  Thomas  de 
Brysban  is'  Tristram  de  Gorthy,  scutiferus  (c).  He  is  one  of  those  noble  persons 
whom  King  James  I.  honoured  with  knightood,  for  the  greater  splendour  of  his  co- 
ronation at  Perth  1424.  The  authority  of  this  is  from  Dr  John  Major;  but  I  must 
caution  my  reader  that  he  is  designed  David  Macy  de  Gask  ;  but  it  is  either  de- 
signed as  a  contraction  of  Murray,  or  one  of  the  typographical  errors  the  book 
abounds  in,  which  I  may  venture  to  say  this  is  but  one  of  a  hundred. 

In  the  1445,  Sir  David  Murray  of  Tullibardin,  according  to  a  humour  that 
then  much  prevailed  among  great  men  of  founding  collegiate  churches,  the  patronage 
of  which  they  abbolutely  reserved  to  themselves,  and  that  they  might  have  the 
benefit  of  the  divine  otlices  near  at  hand,  accordingly  he  founded  and  endowed 
a  college  at  Tullibardin  just  by  his  own  castle,  which  he  provided  with  a  provost 
and  four  prebends,  which  became  a  constant  fund  of  provision  for  the  younger  sons 
of  the  more  remote  branches  of  the  family  in  an  ecclesiastic  way,  till  it  was  sup- 
pressed at  the  reformation  of  religion,  with  the  other  religious  houses  which  were 
then  deemed  nurseries  of  superstition. 

Within  the  Collegiate  Church  of  Tullibardin,  on  the  west  end  of  the  wall,  I 
see  the  arms  of  the  founder  Sir  David  Murray,  and  his  lady  Dame  Isabel  Stewart, 
impaled,  the  three  stars  within  the  bordure  for  Murray,  and  the  fesse  cheque,  and 
the  galley  for  Stewart  of  Lorn,  of  which  family  this  lady  was  a  daughter.  I  have 
seen  several  original  contracts  he  entered  into  by  way  of  indenture  with  Malcolm 
Drummond  of  Cargill,  that  turned  out  very  beneficially  for  his  family;  but,  being 
only  private  matters,  I  forbear  to  mention  them  here  (d).  He  married  Isabel, 
daughter  of  Sir  John  Stewart  of  Innermeth,  Lord  of  Lorn  ((?),  ancestor  to  the 
Earls  of  Athol,  by  whom  he  had  those  children  I  have  seen  vouchers  for, 

Sir  William,  the  eldest,  the  heir  of  the  family. 

John  Murray,  the  second,  designed  of  Drysall  ffj. 

Patrick,  the  third,  who  gix.  off  in  patrimony  the  lands  of  Dollary  and  Dry  Isle 
of  Ochtertyre  (j^).  He  was  sheriff-depute  of  Perthshire,  under  his  brother  Sir 
William  Murray  of  Tullibardin,  in  the  reign  of  King  James  III.  anno  1465  (A). 
Of  his  eldest  son  and  heir  is  lineally  descended  Sir  William  Murray  of  Ocher- 
tyre,  Bart.:  And  of  Ninian,  a  younger  brother,  who  got  in  patrimony  the  lands  of 
Dollary,  are  sprung  the  Murray s  of  Dollary.  of  whom  again  by  a  younger  son, 
Patrick  Murray  of  Newraw,  came  the  Murrays  of  Woodend  (/),  and  of  them  is- 
sued from  a  second  brother,  who  was  a  clergyman,  Mr  William  Murray,  Parson 

(a)  In  the  registers  of  the  Great  Seal  in  the  records.  (h)  In  the  registers  in  the  public  archives, 
(c)  Charta  penes  Dominum  Keir.  (d)  Writs  of  the  House  of  Tullibardin  I  have  seen  in  the  hands  of 
the  Duke  of  Athol.  {e)  Ibidem.  (/)  Lord  Ochiltree's  collections  relating  to  Tullibardin.  (g)  Charta 
penes  ducem  de  Athol.  ("A)  Charta  penes  Dominum  Gleneagles.  (;')  Charta  penes  Laurentium  Oliphan* 
de  Gask. 


iS:<  APPENDIX. 

of  Dysavt,  William  Murray,  Esq.  created  Earl  of  Dysart  by  King  Charles  I.  in,  tlie 
year  1646,  from  whose  daughter,  Eli'zabeth,  Countess  of  Dysart  and  Dutchess  of 
Lauderdale,  the  honour  and  dignity  of  Earl  of  Dysart  devolved  to  Sir  Lionel  Tal- 
nnsh  of  Helmingham,  Bart,  her  son:  Of  this  branch  of  the  Murrays  of  Woodend, 
Su-  Patrick  Murray  of  Balmanno,  Bart,  is  the  heir-male;  his  grandfather,  Sir  Tho- 
mas Murray  of  Glendoick,  who  was  Lord  Register  in  the  reign  of  King  Charles  II. 
and  one  of  the  Senators  of  tire  College  of  Justice,  was  a  younger  brother. 

J.\MES,  of  whom,  from  vouchers  1  have  seen  {k),  is  come  the  Murrays  of  the 
House  of  Struan. 

Alex.\nder,  who  was  the  ancestor  of  the  Murray's  of  Tippermuir  (/),  who  were  a. 
considerable  family,  and  were  well  allied  with  the  best  families  in  Perthshire;  they 
have  still  a  male  representative,  though  he  be  out  of  the  estate,  which  was  once 
very  considerable. 

Sir  David  Murray  of  Tullibardin  had,  besides  these  sons,  several  daughters, 
Mariotta,  who  was  married  to  Sir  Malcolm  Drummond  of  Cargill,  ancestor  to. 
the  Earls  of  Perth  (w).  The  contract  is  by  way  of  indenture,  dated  at  Ochter- 
airder,  the  14th  July  1445  ;  the  marriage-portion  is  eight  hundred  merks  good, 
und  usual  money  of  the  kmgrick  of  Scotland,  to  be  paid  at  eight  different  terms 
annually.  There  are  other  clauses  c-f  mutual  support  and  friendship  betwixt  the 
families,  in  the  strongest  and  most  significant  terms  that  can  be  expressed,  and  par- 
ticularly that  William  Murray  and  Patrick  Murray,  two  of  Sir  David's  sons,  shall 
be  aiding  and  assisting  to  their  new  ally  to  the  utmost  of  their  power  and  ability.. 
There  are  witnesses  to  this  contract,  Michael,  Bishop  of  Dunblane,  Patrick  Lord. 
Graham,  Patrick  Lord  Glammis,  &c. 

Isabel,  who  was  married  to  Malcolm  Drummond  of  Concraig  (/;),  then  Steward 
of  Strathern. 

CHRiSTi.'m,  who  was  married  to  Murdoch  Monteith  of  Rusky,  at  that  time  a 
great  Baron  in  the  county  of  Perth  (0),  by  whom  he  had  two  daughters,  his  heirs  ; 
Agnes,  who  was  married  to  Sir  John  Haldane  of  Gleneagles,  and  Margaret,  to 
John  Napier  of  Merchiston,  ancestor  to  the  Lord  Napier. 

William  Murray  of  Tullibardin,  the  son  and  successor  of  Sir  David,  made  a 
very  considerable  figure  in  his  time.  He  executed  the  office  of  High  Sheriff 
of  the  county  of  Perth,  in  the  reigns  of  James  11.  and  III.  (p),  which  he  discharg- 
ed by  his  brother  Patrick  Murray,  the  ancestor  of  Ochertyre,  as  his  deputy  in 
the  office.  He  is  frequently  in  the  Parliaments  as  a  baron  by  tenure ;  and  in  the 
1458  he  is  one  of  the  lords  named  for  the  administration  of  justice,  who  were  the 
the  king's  daily  council  (;).  We  find  him  also  one  of  the  plenipotentiaries  in  a 
treaty  with  the  English,  1458  (s),  anent  a  peace,  or  the  prorogation  of  a  truce 
betwixt  the  two  nations.  He  enlarged  the  college  of  Tullibardin  founded  by  his 
father,  and  built  that  part  towards  the  west  where  his  arms  and  his  lady's  are  im- 
paled, the  three  stars  within  the  double  tressure,  and  a  cross  ingrailed  for  Colqu. 
houn,  finely  cut  in  stone  on  the  out-side  of  the  wall.  He  married  Margaret, 
daughter  of  Sir  John  Colquhoun  of  Luss,  Knight  in  the  county  of  Dumbarton, 
who  was  Lord  High  Chamberlain  in  the  reign  of  King  James  III.  by  whom  he 
had  a  numerous  issue  ;  the  tradition  is,  they  had  seventeen  sons,  of  whom  a  great 
many  of  the  different  families  of  the  Murrays  throughout  the  kingdom  are  de- 
scended. Sir  William  was  the  eldest,  George  Abbot  of  Inchaflry  was  a  younger 
son  (t),  John  Murray  of  Galvamore  is  called  another,  the  ancestors  of  the  Murrays 
of  Newton,  Balberton,  &.c.  and  are  said  to  be  two  of  the  seventeen  brothers  of  the 
family  of  Tullibardin  :  but  I  cannot  say  that  I  have  seen  any  positive  instruc- 
tion to  vouch  them,  though  the  tradition  is  received  universally  all  the  country, 
over. 

Sir  William  Murray  of  Tullibardin,  the  next  in  the  line  of  this  noble  family,  was 
in  a  high  degree  of  favour  with  King  James  III.  There  is  a.  charter  in  the  custody  of 

(^)  Original  writs  I  Iiave  seen  in  the  cliarter-chest  of  the  family  of  Perth,  ad  annum  1467,  of 
:Iie  lands  of  Innercrutar,  in  which  he  is  designed  son  to  the  deceased  Sir  David  Murray  of  Tullibardin. 
(/)  Charta  penes  ducem  de  Athol.  (m)  The  contract  I  have  |seen,  («)  Charta  penes  dora.  Glen- 
eagles. (0)  Ibidem.  (/>)  Ibidem.  (/-)  Writs  belonging  to  the  family  of  Boswell  of  Balmuto  I  have 
seen,     (j-)  Rymer's  Foedera.     (t)  Writs  I  have  seen  in  the  hands  of  Laurence  Oliphant  of  Gask. 


APPENDIX.  iSg 

his  grace  the  Duke  of  Athol  by  that  prince  ('<),  "  Dilecto  nostro  ac  familiari  mi- 
"  liti  Willielmo  de  Moravia  de  Tillibardme,  pro  suo  tideli  servitio  nobis  impenso 
"  senescalliam  nostram  comitatus  de  Strathern,  ac  dominii  de  Balquhidder."  This 
charter  of  the  stewartry  of  Strathern  and  lordsliip  of  Balquhidder  is  dated  the  1 8th 
of  January  1482.  In  the  first  ParUament  of  King  James  IV.  anno  14^8,  we  find 
him  sitting  as  a  member  ;  for  we  may  remark,  that  although  the  smaller  barons 
were  dispensed  by  an  act  of  King  James  I.  from  personal  attendance  in  Parliament, 
(v)  anno  1427,  yet  the  greater  barons,  even  under  the  degree  of  lords  of  Parliament, 
were  not,  but  sat  there  in  virtue  of  their  baronies  ;  for  though  these  great  barons 
came  but  seldom  to  Parliament,  yet  there  was  no  law  excluding  them,  but  that 
they  might  take  their  seats  there  whenever  they  had  a  mind,  even  though  they 
were  not  called  by  the  king's  writ  or  general  precept.  In  the  parhament  1492  he 
got  a  special  act  in  his  favour,  ratifying  the  grant  formerly  made  to  hmi  of  the 
stewartry  of  Strathern,  which  I  have  seen  in  the  archives  of  the  family.  And  in 
1495  we  find  him  concerned  in  a  treaty  with  the  English,  anent  the  keeping  of  a 
good  understanding  betwixt  the  two  realms  (uy).  In  the  1507,  Sir  William  Murray 
being  by  this  time  grown  aged,  the  king  grants  to  his  well  beloved  and  familiar 
knight,  as  he  designs  him.  Sir  William  Murray  of  TuUibardin,  a  full  exoneration 
in  regard  of  his  great  age,  dispensing  with  his  attendance,  or  coming  either  to 
courts,  or  even  to  the  king's  host  itself. 

He  married  Katharine,  daughter  of  Andrew  Lord  Gray  (v),  by  whom  he  had 
John  his  eldest  son  and  heir  apparent,  who  married  Elizabeth,  a  lady  of  the  fami- 
ly of  the  Crichtons  ( j) ;  but  died  without  issue  in  the  hfetime  of  his  father. 

William,  the  second  son,  who  was  the  heir  of  the  family.  Sir  Andrew,  the  third 
son,  who  got  a  fair  estate  in  marriage  with  Margaret  the  daughter,  and  sole  heir  of 
James  Barclay  of  Arngosk  and  Kippo,  and  was  the  ancestor  of  the  Murrays  of  Bal- 
vaird,  now  dignified  with  the  title  of  Lord  Balvaird,  and  Viscount  of  Stormont  (z), 
David  Murray  of  Strathgeth  {aa). 

He  had  also  two  daughters, 

Christian,  who  was  married  to  George  Lord  Seaton,  ancestor  to  the  Earls  of 
Winton,  and  had  issue  {h¥). 

Elizabeth  to  Thomas  Stewart  of  Grandtully,  and  had  issue  (rt). 

He  died  in  the  1509,  and  was  succeeded  by  William  his  son  and  heir,  whom  1 
have  seen  designed  "  filius  et  heres  quondam  domini  Willielmi  Murray  de  Tilli- 
"  bardine,"  in  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal,  anno  1510  {b). 

He  married  Margaret,  daughter  of  John  Earl  of  Athol  (t},  by  whom  he  had 
William  his  eldest  son,  and  the  heir  of  the  family. 

Andrew. 

David. 

And  a  daughter,  Helen,  married  to  Alexander  Seaton  of  Parbroth  (d),  in  the 
county  of  Fife,  and  had  issue. 

Which  William,  in  1542,  takes  a  charter,  under  the  Great  Seal,  of  his  estate  to 
himself,  and  Katharine  Campbell  his  wife  in  conjunct  infeftment,  and  a  new  in- 
vestiture of  his  whole  fortune,  under  the  Great  Seal,  to  himself  in  liferent,  and  to 
William  his  son  and  heir  apparent  in  fee,  and  to  the  heirs-male  of  his  body,  which 
failing,  to  Alexander  and  James  Murrays  his  sons,  and  to  the  heirs-male  of  their 
bodies  respective  ;  which  failing,  to  Andrew  Murray,  brother-german  to  "William 
Murray  of  TuUibardin,  and  to  the  heirs-male  of  his  body;  which  failing,  to  David 
Murray,  brother  to  the  said  William  also,  and  to  the  heirs-male  of  his  body ;  which 
failing,  to  William  Murray,  son  to  David  Murray  of  AHcht,  and  to  the  heirs-male 
of  his  body  ;  which  failing,  to  David  Murray  of  Ochtertyre,  and  to  the  heirs- 
male  of  his  body  ;  which  failing,  to  Alexander  Murray  of  Struan,  and  to  the 
heirs-male  of  his  body ;  which  failing,  to  John  Murray  of  Wallaceton,  and  the 

(a)  Which  I  have  seen  !n  the  charter-chest  of  the  family,  (u)  Black  acts  of  Parliament,  (lu  Fojdera 
AngliiE.  (r)  Charta  penes  ducera  de  Athol.  (  v)  Charter  to  this  John  Murray,  son  and  heir  apparent 
to  Sir  WiUam  Murray  of  TuUibardin,  and  to  his  lady,  under  the  Great  Seal  in  the  public  records  in  1485. 
(a)  Charta  penes  vicecomitem  de  Stormont.  {aa)  Charta  in  archivis.  (bh)  Ibidem,  (a)  Charta  penes  Sir 
G<:orge  Stewart.  (/)  Charta  penes  ducem  de  Athol  ad  annum  1510.  (f)  Ibidem.  (</}  Sir  Richard 
Maitland's  History  of  the  House  of  Seaton,  MS.  penes  me. 

Vol.  n.  61 


jpo 


APPENDIX. 


heirs-male  of  his  body  ;  all  which  failing,  to  his  nearest  and  lawful  heirs  whatso- 
ever («•). 

He  married  Katharine,  daughter  of  Sir  Colin  Campbell  of  Glenorchy,  ancestor 
ro  the  Earl  of  Breadalbane  (/),  by  whom  he  had  issue. 

Sir  WiLUAM  his  son  and  heir. 

Alexander,  a  Colonel  in  the  service  of  the  States  of  Holland. 

James  Murray  of  Purdovis. 

Andrew,  a  fourth  son. 

Annabella,  his  eldest  daughter,  was  married  to  John  Lord  Erskine,  who  was  af- 
terwards Earl  of  Marr,  and  Regent  of  Scotland  in  the  minority  of  King  James  IV. 
and  had  issue. 

EupHAME,  the  second,  to  Robert  Stewart  of  Rosy  th,  an  ancient  family  in  the  county 
of  Fife  (^),  and  had  issue  ;  and  again  to  Robert  Pitcairn,  commendator  of  Dun- 
fermline, Secretary  of  State  in  the  minority  of  King  James  VI.  (A);  and  last  of  all 
to  Patrick  Gray  of  Innergoury  (;). 

Katherine,  the  third,  to  Rabert  Murray  of  Abercairny,  and  had  issue  {k). 

Jean,  the  fourth,  to  James  Henderson  of  Fordel  (/),  in  the  county  of  Fife,  and 
had  a  most  numerous  progeny,  and  spread  relations  all  the  country  over.  He  died 
I'lnno  1562,  and  was  succeeded  by 

William  his  son  and  heir,  who  was  a  gentleman  of  great  parts  and  reputation  ; 
he  was  a  very  significant  man  in  the  turn  of  the  Reformation,  and  leaned  to  the 
reformed  side  :  He  was  one  of  the  barons,  who,  in  virtue  of  their  baronies,  sat  in 
the  Parliament  1560  {m),  and  established  the  reformed  doctrine,  though  he  seems 
not  to  have  been  concerned  in  those  violences  that  were  carried  on  by  the  more 
zealous  men  of  his  own  party.  Upon  the  queen's  return  from  France  in  the  1561, 
he  got  into  a  good  degree  of  favour  and  confidence  with  her  majesty,  and  had  the 
honour  to  entertain  the  queen  at  his  house  of  Tullibardin  several  times  in  her  pro- 
gress to  the  north ;  after  that  he  was  called  to  the  Privy  Council,  and  was  consti- 
tuted comptrollor  of  the  kingdom,  in  the  year  1565,  the  office  being  then  void  by 
the  deprivation  of  Sir  John  Wishart  of  Pittarrow  {/>). 

Upon  the  murder  of  King  Henry  by  the  Earl  of  Bothwell,  he  was  one  of  the 
barons  who,  with  great  zeal  and  forwardness,  went  into  an  association  for  the  de- 
fence of  the  young  prince  King  James  VI.  and  to  pursue  the  Earl  of  Bothwell, 
and  to  bring  him  to  justice  for  the  execrable  fact  he  had  committed  on  the  king's 
father  ;  and  perhaps  he  was  not  the  less  keen  in  prosecuting  that  wicked  earl,  that 
he  had  the  honour  to  be  second  cousin  to  King  Henry  the  murdered  prince  ;  but 
his  keenness  for  the  safety  and  preservation  of  the  young  prince  did  not  influence 
him  to  behave  in  any  way  undutifully  towards  the  queen  his  sovereign  ;  for  an 
author  of  great  worth  and  credit  at  that  time  (0),  says,  speaking  of  the  Laird  of 
Tullibardin,  "  That  he  always  retained  a  dutiful  respect  to  the  queen's  majesty,  and 
"  only  entered  into  the  association  for  safety  of  the  young  prince,  and  punishment 
•'  of  the  king's  murder."  Though  the  Laird  of  TulHbardin,  the  comptroller,  was  in 
great  friendship  and  confidence  with  some  of  those  who  went  all  lengths  against 
the  queen,  yet  he  could  never  be  prevailed  on  to  concur  with  them  in  one  single  act 
that  was  derogatory  to  her  honour,  dignity,  and  safety  ;  but  when  the  queen  was 
forced  to  fly  out  of  the  kingdom,  and  the  government  established  in  the  person  of 
her  son  the  prince,  he  submitted  to  that  authority,  and  kept  the  comptroller's 
place  long  after.  He  was  of  the  Privy  Council  to  the  regents  (p)  :  Upon  the  death 
of  the  Earl  of  Marr  the  Regent,  who  was  his  brother-in-law,  in  the  1572,  he,  and 
Sir  Alexander  Erskine  of  Gogar,  commonly  called  Master  of  Marr,  were  appointed 
governors  to  the  young  king,  and  joint  keepers  of  the  castle  of  Stirling,  where  the 
king  resided  and  was  brought  up  ;  and  he  discharged  the  office  to  the  universal  ap- 
probation of  the  whole  kingdom,  till  the  1578,  that  the  king  took  upon  himself 
the  sole  administration.     How  soon  the  king  constituted   a  new  Privy  Council  he 

{f)  In  publicis  archivis.  (f)  Charter  under  the  Great  Seal  in  the  records  ad  annum  1538.  {g)  Ibi- 
dem, charta  in  the  charter-chest  of  Rosyth,  which  I  have  seen  the  note  of.  fh)  Charta  in  archivis. 
(i)  Ibidem,  (k)  Charta  penes  dora.  Abercairny.  (/)  Charta  in  pub.  arch,  (m)  Mr  Keith's  Col- 
lections, (n)  Charta  in  RotuUs,  and  Mr  Keith's  Collections,  {o)  Sir  James  Melvil's  Memoirs  of  his 
own  time,     (fi)  Records  of  the  Council  in  the  Signet  Office. 


APPENDIX.  tpi 

was  one  of  the  number,  in  which  he  contiiuied  till  his  death,  on  the  15th  March 
1583  (</),  He  left  issue  by  Agnes  his  wife,  daughter  of  William  second  Eail  of 
Montrose  (;),  John  his  eldest  son  and  heir,  Mr  William  Murray  designed  of  Tit- 
cairlie  (j),  and  Mungo  Murray  of  Dunork(/),  and  two  daughters,  Margaret,  who 
was  married  to  Sir  Robert  Kruce  of  Clackiuanan,  Knight  («)  ;  of  which  marriage 
some  of  the  most  noble  and  illustrious  persons  in  Great  Britain  arc  descended, 
and  have  this  lady's  blood  running  in  their  veins;  and  Jean  to  Sir  John  Hepburn 
of  Waughton. 

John  Murray  of  TuUibardin  was  in  great  favour  with  King  James  VI. 
with  whom  he  had  been  bred  up  in  an  intimacy  from  his  childhood,  which  begat 
a  confidence  that  was  never  shaken  :  In  the  year  1592  he  was  constituted  Master 
of  the  King's  Household  (v),  and  soon  after  that  had  the  honour  of  knighthood 
conferred  on  him.  But  his  majesty's  favour  to  Sir  John  Murray  did  not  stop  here, 
for  he  was  further  graciously  pleased  to  raise  him  to  the  peerage  by  the  stile  and 
title  of  Lord  Murray  of  TuUibardin,  by  letters  patent  the  25th  of  April  1(104  (xf)  : 
The  same  year  he  gets  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal  of  the  lands  of  Letter- 
banachy,  to  himself  during  his  own  lifetime,  and  to  William  his  eldest  son  in  fee, 
and  to  the  heirs-male  of  his  body  ;  which  failing,  to  Captain  John  Murray,  his  se- 
cond son  ;  and  fliiling  the  issue-male  of  his  body,  to  Sir  Patrick  Murray  of  Castle- 
ton,  his  third  son ;  and  failing  his  male  issue,  to  Mungo  Murray,  his  fourth  son  ; 
and  failing  him,  to  Robert  Murray,  his  fifth  son ;  and  the  heirs-male  of  their 
bodies  respective ;  which  failing,  to  Mr  William  Murray  of  Pitcairlie,  his  bro- 
ther-german,  and  to  the  heirs-male  of  his  body  ;  which  failing,  to  Mungo 
Murray  of  Dunork,  his  brother-german,  and  the  heirs-male  of  his  body,  &c.  (.v). 

The  Lord  TuUibardin  rising  still  more  and  more  in  his  majesty's  favour,  he  was  fur- 
ther gi-aciously  pleased  to  raise  him  to  the  honour,  title,  and  dignity  of  Earl  of  TuUi- 
bardin, by  letters  patent,  bearing  date  the  loth  of  July  i6c6  (y).  A  commission 
being  directed  to  Alexander  Earl  of  Dunfermline,  then  his  Majesty's  High  Com- 
missioner, to  invest,  with  the  usual  solemnities,  the  Lord  TuUibardin  in  the 
honour  of  Earl  of  TuUibardin,  the  Lord  Fleming  in  the  honour  of  Earl  of  Wigton, 
the  Lord  Glammis  in  the  honour  of  Earl  of  Kinghorn,  the  Lord  Abercorn  Earl  of 
Abercorn,  all  on  the  same  day  (z). 

John,  first  Earl  of  TuUibardin,  married  Dame  Katherine  Drummond,  daughter 
of  David  Lord  Drummond,  ancestor  to  the  Earls  of  Perth  (n),  by  whom  he  had 
issue, 

William,  his  eldest  son  and  successor. 

Captain  John  Murray,  his  second  son. 

Sir  Patrick  Murray  of  Castleton,  Knight  of  the  Bath,  his  third  son,  and  who 
became  afterwards  Earl  of  TuUibardin,  on  the  surrender  of  the  honour  by  his  eldest 
brother  the  Earl  of  TuUibardin. 

Mungo  Murray,  the  fourth  son,  who  became  Viscount  of  Stormont,  by  special 
provision  of  David  the  first  Viscount  of  Stormont,  whom  he  made  his  heir  :  But 
though  he  was  first  married  to  Agnes,  daughter  of  Sir  Andrew  Murray  of  Balvaird, 
and  niece  to  the  Viscount  of  Stormont,  and  after  that  to  Elizabeth,  daughter 
of  David  Earl  of  Wemyss,  yet  he  had  no  succession;  so  the  dignity  of  Viscount 
of  Stormont  at  length  came  to  Murray,  then  Lord  Balvaird. 

Robert  Murray,  the  fifth  son. 

ANNe,  the  Earl's  eldest  daughter,  was  married  to  Patrick  Lord  Glammis,  and  first 
Earl  of  Kinghorn,  ancestor  to  the  present  Earl  of  Strathmore,  and  had  issue  (/?>). 

LiLiAS,  the  second,  to  Sir  John  Grant  of  Freuchie,  the  Laird  of  Grant,  and  had 
issue  (c). 

(y)  Charta  in  cancellaria  S.  D.  N.  regis  ad  annum  1584.  (r)  Charta  in  publicis  archivis  ad  annum 
154^.  (s)  Charter  of  the  lands  of  Letterbanachy,  in  the  custody  of  James  Murray  of  Abercaimy. 
(;_)  Ibidem  ad  annum  1604.  (a)  Charta  in  archivis.  (v)  Acts  of  Parliament  IJip?.  (w)  Creations 
of  the  Nobility,  MS.  (.v)  This  charter  I  have  seen  in  the  hands  of  James  Murray  of  Abercaimy. 
(  v)  Creations  of  the  Nobility  from  the  Records.  (?)  Creations  of  Nobility  in  my  own  hands,  (a)  Charta 
penes  ducera  de  Athol,  and  Lieutenant-General  Drummond's  History  of  the  Drummonds,  in  my  own 
custody,  MS.      (i)   Penes  ducem  de  Athol.      it)  Charta  in  publicis  archivis. 


192 


APPENDIX. 


Margaret,  the  third  daughter,  to  James  Haldane  of  Gleneagles,  and  had 
issue  (a). 

Catharine,  the  fourth  daughter,  was  married  to  David  Ross  of  Balnagowan  in 
Ross-shire,  the  heir-male  and  representative  of  the  ancient  earls  of  Ross,  and  had 
issue  (b). 

William,  the  second  earl  of  Tullibardin,  while  he  was  a  young  man,  being 
happily  in  the  town  of  Perth  on  the  ever  memorable  5th  of  August  1600,  when 
John  Earl  ofGowrie,  and  Mr  Alexander  Ruthven,  his  brother,  attempted  to  lay  vio- 
lent hands  on  the  sacred  person  of  the  king  their  sovereign  ;  upon  their  being 
both  slain,  the  citizens  of  Perth  hearing  that  the  Earl  of  Gowrie,  who  had  been 
their  provost  at  the  time,  was  slain,  rose  in  a  tumult,  and  in  all  probability,  con- 
sidering their  numbers  and  the  ferment  they  were  in,  would  have  cut  the  Court  in 
pieces,  if  the  young  Laird  of  Tullibardin,  who  was  accidentally  in  town  that  day, 
had  not  interposed  with  his  retinue,  and  his  friends  carried  off  the  king  and  all 
with  him  safe  to  Falkland.  For  this  most  signal  and  meritorious  service,  the 
Laird  of  Tullibardin  got  the  sheriffship  of  Perthshire,  that  had  heritably  belonged 
to  the  House  of  Ruthven  the  Earls  of  Gowrie,  and  has  mostly  continued  in  the 
family  of  Athol  ever  since  that  time. 

This  William,  the  second  Earl  of  Tullibardin,  made  a  very  noble  alliance  by 
marriage,  for  his  Lordship  married  the  Lady  Dorothea  Stewart,  eldest  daughter 
and  heir  of  line  to  John  the  fifth  Earl  of  Athol,  of  the  Stewartine  line,  by  whom 
he  had  only  John  his  son  and  heir,  and  a  daughter,  Anne,  who  was  married  to  Sir 
John  Moncrief  of  that  Ilk,  then  an  ancient  considerable  family,  as  any  in  all  the 
county  of  Perth. 

This  Earl  of  Tullibardin  laid  before  his  Majesty  King  Charles  I.  the  claim  and 
title  his  lady,  the  Countess  of  Tulhbardin,  and  his  children,  had  to  the  honour 
and  dignity  of  Earl  of  Athol ;  setting  forth.  That  the  countess  was  the  eldest 
daughter,  and  heir  of  line  and  at  law  to  the  deceased  Earl  of  Athol,  her  father  ; 
That  the  family  of  Innermeth,  who  had  got  the  title  of  Earl  of  Athol  upon  the 
demise  of  her  father,  were  now  all  extinct,  and  out  of  the  way,  and  therefore  she 
conceived  that  she  was  well  entitled  to  her  father's  dignity  :  The  king  received  the 
petition  very  graciously,  and  told  the  Earl  of  Tullibardin,  That  since  it  was  plain 
The  former  earls  of  Athol  were  all  extinct  in  the  male  line,  that  it  was  but  just  and 
reasonable  that  the  dignity  of  Earl  of  Athol,  which  had  so  long  and  so  gloriously 
flourished  in  the  race  of  the  Stewarts,  in  whom  he  himself  had  a  relation  in  blood, 
should  be  revived  and  established  in  the  person  and  descendants  of  the  lady,  who 
was  the  heir  of  line  and  at  law,  and  gave  his  royal  word  the  thing  should  be  done  : 
But  as  the  Earl  of  Tullibardin  was  to  do  his  lady  and  children  justice,  so  as  to 
have  the  title  and  honour  of  Earl  of  Athol  brought  in  to  them,  so  he  did  not 
think  but  that  he  ought  to  take  care  to  do  all  that  was  possible  for  him  to  pre- 
serve the  honour  of  Earl  of  Tullibardin,  as  a  distinct  and  separate  dignity,  that 
was  not  to  be  immerged  or  consolidated  into  that  of  Earl  of  Athol,  how  soon  that 
honour  came  to  be  vested  in  his  son,  who  would  become  heir  both  to  his  father 
and  mother  in  their  respective  dignities  and  peerage  ;  this  the  earl  represented 
to  his  majesty  so  effectually  that  it  was  agreed  and  concerted  that  he  should  re- 
sign and  surrender  his  own  title  and  peerage  of  Earl  of  Tulhbardin  in  his  majesty's 
hands,  in  favour  of  his  brother  Sir  Patrick  Murray,  Knight  of  the  Bath,  and  one 
of  the  Gentlemen  of  the  Bedchamber,  and  who  himself  had  a  good  share  of  favour, 
and  had  acquired  the  estate  of  Tullibardin  from  his  brother.  Accordingly  Wil- 
liam Earl  of  Tullibardin  did  surrender,  on  the  first  of  April  1626  (c),  the  title, 
honour,  dignity,  and  precedency  of  Earl  of  Tulhbardin,  in  order  that  it  might  be, 
de  novo,  conferred  on  Sir  Patrick  Murray  aforesaid  ;  but  in  the  interim,  before  the 
several  different  deeds  and  patents  could  be  got  perfected  and  expede,  the  Earl  of 
Tullibardin  died,  which  brought  all  these  transactions  for  some  time  to  a  stand;  but 
that  just  and  excellent  prince,  King  Charles,  well  knowing  the  intention  of  the 

(a)  The  contract  I  have  seen  in  Gleneagle's  hands,  It  is  dated  the  26th  January  1600,  the  portion  is 
9000  merks  of  the  realm  of  Scotland.  (.b)  Account  of  Balnagoivan  I  have  seen,  (c)  Chartaincan- 
cellatia  S-  D.  N.  R-  ad  annum  1626- 


APPENDIX.  ixjs 

parties  in  the  whole  transaction,  and  that  it  was  intended  that  both  the  peerage  ot 
Athol  and  Tulhbardin  should  be  distinctly  represented,  therefore  his  majesty  was 
graciously  pleased  to  acknowledge  that  William,  the  deceased  Earl  of  TuUibardin, 
had  resigned  his  title  of  honour  of  Earl  of  TuUibardin  in  favour  of  his  brother  Sir 
Patrick  Murray,  and  which  he  is  moved  in  justice  to  confer  upon  him  :  Accord- 
ingly a  patent  is  expede  the  Great  Seal,  creating  him  Earl  of  TuUibardin,  bearing 
ddte  the  penult  of  January  1628  (rt),  and  to  his  heu-s-raale  whatsoever  :  But  the 
kmg,  who  regulated  his  whole  conduct  by  the  maxims  and  principles  of  conscience 
and  honour,  having  done  justice  to  Sir  Patrick  Murray,  in  giving  him  the  title  of 
Earl  of  TuUibardin,  conform  to  the  intention  of  the  resignation,  he  very  quickly 
after  that  did  justice  to  his  nephew  John  Murray,  son  and  heir  of  the  deceased 
William  Earl  of  TuUibardin ;  for  he  was  soon  after  invested  in  the  honour,  title, 
dignity,  and  peerage  of  Earl  of  Athol.  The  preamble  of  the  patent  is  very  noble, 
and  reflects  great  honour  on  the  patentee  ;  for  his  majesty  narrates  that  the  honour 
and  dignity  of  Earl  of  Athol  had  continued  successively  in  the  line  and  posterity 
of  John  Earl  of  Athol,  who  was  uterine  'brother  to  the  king's  illustrious  ancestor 
Kmg  James  II.,  to  the  deatii  of  John  the  fifth  Earl  of  Athol,  the  patentee's  own 
grandfather,  whose  eldest  daughter,  Dorothea  Countess  of  TuUibardin,  was  mother 
to  him.  the  king's  predi/crtus  consaii^uiiifus,  as  he  is  pleased  to  term  the  patentee, 
Johannes  Murray  nunc  creatus  Comes  Atb'Aie.  The  narrative  goes  on  declaring 
that  his  majesty  was  moved  purely  from  principles  of  honour  and  conscience  to 
give,  ratify  and  confirm  to  the  earl,  the  title  of  Earl  of  Athol,  and  that  in  truth  in 
the  very  strongest  terms  that  could  be  devised,  to  express  his  right  as  heir  of  line 
to  his  maternal  ancestor  John  the  first  Earl  of  Athol,  who  had  that  peerage  con- 
ferred on  bun  by  his  brother  King  James  II.  For  all  these  reasons,  "  Nos  de 
"  novo,"  says  the  sovereign,  "  damus,  concessimus,  et  contulimus  tenoreque  pre- 
"  sentiam  damus  concedimus  et  conferimus  prefato  Johanni  Murray,  nunc  Comes 
"  Athohe,  prefatam  dignitatem  comitatus  Atholie,  et  haeredibus  suis,  &c."  The 
patent  bears  date  at  Whitehall  the  17th  of  February  1629  (6). 

This  noble  earl  continued  a  loyal  and  quiet  subject  during  the  peaceable  time 
of  the  reign  of  King  Charles.  At  the  first  rupture,  when  the  troubles  began  in 
the  1639,  he  attached  himself  to  the  king's  side  with  great  firmness  and  fidelity  ; 
he  raised  his  Athol  men  to  the  number  of  eighteen  hundred  or  two  thousand  men, 
declaring  his  intention  was  to  support  the  honour  and  dignity  of  the  crown  ;  and 
that  he  would  oppose  every  measure,  or  whatever  party,  he  judged  were  driving 
things  to  lessen  or  eclipse  the  lustre  of  it,  or  were  making  undue  and  illegal  stretches, 
on  whatsoever  pretence,  of  lessening  or  invading  the  sovereignty  in  any  branch 
of  its  inherent  power. 

But  all  jealousies  and  animosities  being,  at  least  seemingly,  composed  by  tlie 
king's  own  presence  in  the  Pari.  1641,  partiesof  both  sides  laid  down  their  arms,  and 
seemed  to  outvie  one  another  who  should  express  their  loyalty  and  duty  most  to 
his  majesty,  who  had  removed  all  their  grievances,  and  settled  every  thing  to  the 
desire  of  their  hearts.  The  Earl  of  Athol  died  next  year  after  this,  annu 
1642  ;  his  death  was  looked  on  as  a  very  great  loss  to  the  king's  service,  consider- 
ing that  he  left  his  son  very  young,  a  mere  child,  in  no  capacity  of  heading  his 
men,  or  leading  them  on  to  action,  a  thing  the  Highlanders  have  at  all  times  been 
fond  of:  And  if  we  but  consider  what  great  matters  the  Marquis  of  Montrose  did 
with  but  a  small  number  of  the  Athol  men,  that  resorted  to  him  from  principle, 
when  he  set  up  the  king's  standa,i-d  and  declared  for  his  majesty,  what,  in  a  rea- 
sonable conjecture,  yea  what  wonders  might  have  been  performed,  if  all  the  Athol 
men  had  been  drawn  together,  and  appeared  in  the  field  with  their  own  master  and 
chief  the  Earl  of  Athol  at  their  heard  ?     But  this  by  the  by. 

John,  the  first  of  the  line  and  race  of  the  Murrays  Earls  of  Athol,  left  issue  by 
Jean  his  wife,  daughter  of  Sir  Duncan  Campbell  of  Glenorchy,  aunt  to  John  the 
first  Earl  of  Breadalbane,  John  his  eldest  son  and  heir,  thereafter  Earl  and  Mar- 
fa^  Patent  in  the  Chancery  Office  at  Edinburgh,  ad  annum  1628,  bearing  that  the  honoir  had  been 
resigned  by  the  deceased  Earl  of  TuUibardia  his  brother,  the  first  of  April  1626.  {b}  Patent  recordc^i 
■;B  the  Chancery  office  at  Edinburgh. 

Vol.  n.  6  K 


194  APPENDIX. 

quis  of  Athol,  Mungo  Murray,  who  was  Lieutenant  of  his  Majesty's  Guards  at  the 
Restoration ;  he  died  unmarried,  and  was  interred  in  St  Giles's  churcli  at  Edin- 
burgh, at  che  tomb  of  John  Earl  of  Athol,  who  died  Lord  Chancellor  in  the  1579, 
where  the  honours  that  were  hung  up  at  his  funeral  are  still  to  be  seen  by  the 
curious.  The  Earl  of  Athol  had  also  one  daughter,  Anne,  who  was  married  to 
her  first  cousin  James  Earl  of  TuUibardin,  who  was  the  son  of  her  uncle 
Patrick  Earl  of  TuUibardin,  who  had  that  honour,  as  we  have  heretofore 
observed  in  this  memorial,  conferred  on  him  by  King  Charles  L  This  Pa- 
trick Earl  of  TuUibardin  married  Dame  Elizabeth  Dent,  an  English  lady,  by 
whom  he  had  issue 

Jajies,  his  son  and  successor  in  the  honour,  and  a  younger  son,  William  Murray 
of  Redcastle,  who  being  in  the  king's  army  at  Philiphaugh,  was  taken  prisoner, 
and  suffered  at  St  Andrews  in  the  1646  (rt).  He  w-as  a  lively  young  man  ;  he 
was  much  regretted  by  all  ranks  and  all  parties ;  for  he  was  of  great  expectations, 
and  was  not  above  eighteen  years  of  age  at  his  death  :  His  brother  got  his  estate, 
who,  it  is  reported,  pressed  his  death  very  indecently  :  but  it  was  observable,  that 
though  he  had  at  that  time  two  sons  that  died  so  quickly  after  other,  that  many 
remarks  were  made  on  it ;  for  though  he  had  two  wives,  first  his  cousin  the  Earl 
of  Athol's  daughter,  and  after  that  Lilias,  daughter  of  Sir  John  Drummond  of 
Machany,  yet  he  left  no  child  to  inherit  his  fortune,  but  died  without  issue  on  the 
the  26th  of  January  1670  (1^),  and  his  estate  and  honour  devolved  to  the  Earl  of 
Athol  as  his  nearest  heir. 

John,  the  second  earl  of  the  line  of  the  Murrays  Earls  of  Athol,  succeeded 
his  father  in  the  honour  while  he  was  very  young  :  but  being  bred  up  in  the 
principles  of  loyalty  and  fidelity  to  the  crown  and  the  royal  family,  in  all  the  dis- 
tress it  was  then  under,  he  stuck  to  it  with  the  most  firm,  unshaken,  and  inviolable 
fidelity. 

In  the  year  1653,  when  the  Earl  of  Glencairn  set  up  the  king's  standard  in  the 
Highlands,  the  Earl  of  Athol  resorted  to  him,  and  brought  2000  of  his  men  to  the 
camp;  and  though  he  was  now  scarce  eighteen,  he  endured  the  fatigue  and  ill  ac- 
commodation the  army  was  unavoidably  exposed  to  with  the  vigour  and  resolution 
that  could  have  been  expected  from  the  most  veteran  soldier  among  them;  and 
both  the  Earl  of  Glencairn,  who  was  the  first  general,  and  the  Earl  of  Middle- 
ton,  who  afterwards  had  the  command  of  the  army,  always  acknowledged  and 
declared  afterwards,  that  if  it  had  not  been  that  the  Earl  of  Athol  was  among 
them,  and  the  support  his  country  afibrded  them,  they  should  have  starved  for 
want  of  provision  and  forage,  and  their  keeping  so  long  together  was  m.ore  owing 
to  the  Earl  of  Athol  than  to  all  the  other  great  men  that  were  among  them. 

Upon  the  happy  Restoration  of  King  Charles  II.  anno  1660,  the  Earl  of  Athol's 
merit  and  loyalty  being  so  eminent  and  conspicuous,  could  not  well  fail  of  being 
highly  rewarded  and  considered,  as  it  well  deserved  :  He  was  firet  named  one  of 
the  new  Privy  Council,  and  acted  as  principal  master  of  the  king's  household  in 
the  absence  of  the  Marquis  of  Argyle,  at  the  solemnity  of  the  Parliament  vvhich 
sat  down  at  Edinburgh  the  first  of  January  1661  (f).  Qiiickly  after  that,  getting 
into  a  high  degree  of  favour  with  his  majesty,  and  in  the  most  entire  conridence 
and  friendship  of  the  Earl  of  Lauderdale,  then  the  sole  Secretary  and  Minister  tor 
Scotland,  his  Lordship,  the  Earl  of  Athol,  was  made  and  constituted  Lord  Justice- 
General  in  place  of  the  Earl  of  Cassihs,  who  had  been  named  to  the  office,  but  de- 
clined to  accept,  because  he  could  not  bring  himself  up  to  take  the  oaths  enjoined 
oy  law,  anno  1663. 

The  earl  rising  still  more  and  more  in  favour  and  confidence  both  of  the  king 
and  the  minister,  he  was  preferred  to  be  captain  of  the  guards  on  the  demise  of 
the  Earl  of  Newburgh,  anyio  1670,  and  one  of  the  Extraordinary  Lords  of  the 
Session.  In  the  1672  the  Earl  of  Athol,  without  parting  with  any  of  his  other 
offices,  was  made  Lord  Privy  Seal,  then  void  by  the  death  of  the  Earl  of  Dun- 
fermline: But  his  majesty  thinking  all  these  great  employments  were  not  enough 
to  reward  the  merit  and  services  of  the  Earl  of  Athol,  therefore  his  majesty  was 

(fl)  Bishop  Gutlirie's  Memoirs.  (V)  Letter  in  the  hands  of  the  Laiid  of  Abercairny.  (c)  Manu- 
script History  of  these  times  in  my  hands. 


APPENDIX.  195- 

graciously  pleased  to  raise  him  to  a   higher  degree  and  title  of  honour  ;   so  he  was 
created  Marquis  of  Athol  bv  letters  patent,  bearing  date  the  1 7tli  of  February 

1676(^0- 

As  the  Lord  Athol  had  been  in  a  long  and  firm  friendship  with  the  Secretary, 
the  Earl  of  Lauderdale,  so  he  was  a  great  support  to  the  other  in  keeping  his 
court,  and  having  so  deep  a  root  with  the  king.  Lauderdale  had  now  possessed 
all  his  friends  with  a  notion,  that  was  at  first  believed  by  them  all,  that  the  people 
in  the  western  shires  were  in  a  state  of  rebellion,  and  were  to  be  reduced  by  a  su- 
perior force;  for  this  end  he  got  the  king  to  write  to  all  the  chiefs  in  the  High- 
lands to  raise  their  men  to  march  to  the  west;  among  others  the  Marquis  of  Athol 
raised  3000  of  his  Athol  men;  the  Earls  of  Breadalbane,  Marr,  Perth,  Strathmore, 
&-C.  raised  such  as  depended  on  them,  which  in  all  amounted  to  an  army  of  8  or 
9000  men,  who  were  to  be  let  loose  in  the  west  on  free  quarter  as  if  they  had 
been  in  an  enemy's  country.  The  Lord  Athol  actually  went  to  the  west,  and  was 
named  one  of  the  committee  of  council  that  were  to  give  the  necessary  orders  to 
the  army:  But  his  lordship  quickly  perceiving  when  he  came  to  tlie  west  how  he 
had  been  deceived,  and  the  state  of  that  country  so  dreadfully  misrepresented,  that 
they  were  so  far  from  being  in  any  degree  of  rebellion  that  they  were  in  a  state 
of  perfect  quiet,  that  by  no  single  circumstance  it  could  appear  to  him  that  any 
rebellion  was  intended,  when  he  had  examined  as  far  into  the  bottom  of  things  as 
was  possible,  while  he  remained  in  that  part  of  the  country :  So  his  Lordbhip  be- 
ing of  himself  a  noble,  generous,  free-hearted  man,  he  would  be  no  longer  a  party 
in  so  violent  an  administration,  nor  could  he  endure  to  see  such  havock  made  in 
any  part  of  the  kingdom  where  he  himself  was  a  subject.  So  upon  this  he  fell 
off  from  Duke  Lauderdale,  and  joined  with  Duke  of  Hamilton,  the  Earl  of  Perthj 
and  ten  or  twelve  of  the  nobility,  with  about  150  gentlemen  of  quality,  who  went 
up  to  London  to  complain  of  the  violence  and  illegality  of  the  administration.^ 
But  thvjugh  the  king  saw  the  Lord  Athol,  yet  he  would  not  disgrace  the  Duke  of 
Lauderdale,  much  less  punish  him  for  what  he  had  done.  The  Marquis  of  Athol, 
having  so  many  places  in  so  small  a  country,  had  raised  a  great  clamour,  so  to  stop 
that,  now  that  he  was  upon  the  side  that  were  the  patriots,  and  set  up  to  be  the 
protectors  of  the  liberties  of  Scotland,  he  quit  the  Justice-General's  place,  which 
was  given  to  Sir  Archibald  Primrose  of  Dalmeny  in  the  167B;  and  he  kept  the 
Privy  Seal  and  his  other  posts  and  offices,  without  any  visible  diminution  in  his 
majesty's  favour,  till  the  king's  death  in  the  1685. 

Upon  the  accession  of  his  Majesty  King  James  VIL  to  the  throne,  the  Marquis 
of  Athol  had  still  a  good  share  of  favour,  for  he  had  a  great  deal  of  merit  with  the 
new  king,  since  he  had  gone  with  great  zeal  into  the  act  of  Parhament  in  1681, 
declaring  the  hereditary  right  to  the  crown  in  the  legal  lineal  course  of  the  suc- 
cession in  favour  of  his  Majesty  Vifhile  he  was  Duke  of  Albany  and  York;  so 
his  Lordship  the  Marquis  of  x\thol  was  continued  Lord  Privy  Seal  and  his  other 
offices.  Upon  the  inva^ion  of  the  Earl  of  Argyle  the  Marquis  was  thought  the 
fittest  person  the  council  could  pitch  on  to  make  head  against  him;  for  that  end 
they  ordered  him  to  raise  so  many  of  his  vassals  and  dependants  as  l>e  thought 
necessary  to  march  into  Argyleshire,  to  prevent  the  progress  the  Earl  might  have 
in  making  levies  amongst  his  friends  and  vassals  there.  To  give  the  Marquis  the 
greater  authority,  it  seems,  to  .execute  any  orders  he  might  receive  from  his  Ma- 
jesty, or  the  council,  he  was  made  Lieutenant  of  the  shires  of  Argyle  and  Tarbet.. 
In  this  memorial  I  will  pursue  this  matter  no  farther;  the  fate  of  the  Earl  of 
Argyle,  and  the  suppressing  that  rebellion,  is  so  well  known  that  I  can  add  nothing- 
to  the  relation  of  them  that  are  in  so  many  printed  books,  and  in  our  acts  of  Par- 
liament so  fully  set  forth. 

Qi^iickly  after  this  the  Marquis  of  Athol  was  invested  with  the  power  of  Justiciary 
in  Argyleshire,  to  try  and  bring  to  justice  such  as  had  been  concerned  m  the  re- 
bellion: But  considering  the  attachment  and  dependence  the  Highlanders  have 
upon  their  chief,  and  the  heads  of  their  clans  and  tribes,  w'hich  no  man  living 
knew  better  than  his  Lordship,  so  little  blood  w'a;  shed,   and  but  few  examples^ 

•"(j)   Patent  recorded  in  the  Chancery. 


196  APPENDIX. 

made,  and  the  few  executions  that  were,  were  done  by  his  two  deputes  in  the 
office,  tlie  one  a  gentleman  ot  Athol,  and  the  other  a  gentleman  of  the  shire  of 
Ayr. 

Soon  after  the  affair  of  the  Earl  of  Argyle  was  over,  the  Marquis  of  Athol  went 
up  to  wait  on  the  king;  he  was  most  graciously  received,  and  his  majesty  was 
pleased  to  express  his  sense  of  his  lordship's  services  in  the  most  obliging  expres- 
sions and  words  that  have  proceeded  from  a  prince  to  a  subject.  In  this  gale  of 
favour,  if  the  Marquis  had  not  been  firm  and  inflexible  in  the  point  of  his  religion, 
which  he  could  not  sacrifice  to  the  pleasure  of  any  mortal,  he  might  have  been 
the  first  minister  for  Scotland,  and  all  others  in  a  dependance  on  him,  and  have 
ruled  as  absolutely  as  ever  the  Duke  of  Lauderdale  had  done  before  him. 

Though  the  king  found  the  Marquis  was  not  to  be  wrought  on  in  the  matter  of 
his  religion,  yet  in  all  other  things,  knowing  his  loyalty  and  duty  was  superior  to 
all  temptations,  he  placed  an  entire  and  unsuspected  confidence  in  his  Lordship, 
for  he  was  one  of  the  Secret  Committee  to  whom  the  administration  was  chiefly 
committed,  and  the  confidence  lodged  («),  till  the  end  of  that  reign. 

In  the  1687  ^^^  Majesty  was  graciously  pleased  to  revive  the  Most  Ancient  and 
Most  Noble  Order  of  St  Andrew,  called  the  Thistle,  that  had  gone  mto  desuetude 
from  the  time  that  Queen  Mary  had  fallen  in  her  troubles :  The  Order  was  to 
consist  of  twelve  knights  and  the  sovereign,  in  imitation  of  our  blessed  Saviour  and 
and  the  twelve  Apostles ;  they  were  all  the  king's  particular  favourites  and  confidants 
that  were  first  mstalled;  of  the  number  the  Maiquis  of  Athol  was  one;  his  com- 
panions, the  other  knights,  so  many  of  the  number  as  were  filled  up,  were  George 
Duke  of  Gordon,  James,  then  Earl  of  Arran,  the  late  Duke  of  Hamilton,  James 
Earl  of  Perth,  the  Lord  Chancellor,  John  Earl  of  Melford,  the  Secretary,  Alexander 
Earl  of  Murray,  Kenneth  Earl  of  Seaforth,  George  Earl  of  Dumbarton,  General  of 
the  Forces:  The  Revolution  came  on  so  soon  after  that  the  full  compliment  of  the 
knights  were  never  filled  up. 

After  the  revolution  of  the  government,  that  the  throne  was  filled  by  the 
Prince  and  Princess  of  Orange,  the  late  King  William  and  Q^ieen  Mary,  the  Mar- 
quis of  Athol  retired  from  all  public  business,  and  spent  the  rest  of  his  time  at 
some  of  his  fine  seats  in  the  country  all  his  life  after.  He  died  the  6th  of  May 
1703,  in  the  70th  year  of  his  age.  He  was  interred  within  the  vestry  of  the  Old 
Cathedral  Church  of  Dunkeld,  where  a  sumptuous  and  magnificent  monument  of 
black  and  white  marble  is  erected  over  his  grave.  The  effigies  of  the  Marquis, 
and  the  Lady  Marchioness  of  Athol,  his  lady,  in  bust,  are  on  the  two  great  Co- 
rinthian pillars  that  support  the  tomb:  There  are  also  placed  the  probative  quar- 
ters or  branches,  as  they  are  called,  of  the  Marquis  on  the  right  pillar,  and  the 
Lady  Marchioness  on  the  left  pillar.  On  a  tablet  of  black  marble  there  is  an  in- 
scription containing  the  several  offices  the  Marquis  passed  through,  and  the  most 
material  steps  of  his  life. 

Sixteen  of  the  coats  of  arms  of  those  illustrious  families,  eight  on  the  paternal 
side,  and  other  eight  on  the  maternal  line,  did  compose  the  escutcheon  of  John 
Duke  of  Athol ;  and  being  so  very  noble  and  illustrious,  the  publishers  of  this 
posthumous  work  of  Mr  Nisbet  judged  this  escutcheon  was  the  most  proper  in- 
stance they  could  fall  upon  for  illustrating  a  funeral  escutcheon;  and  accordingly 
they  have  caused  engrave  a  copperplate  of  his  Grace  the  Duke  of  Athol's  scutcheon 
in  that  part  of  the  work  that  treats  of  funeral  solemnities,  with  all  the  proper  and 
congruent  trimmings  of  his  ducal  dignity,  as  the  supporters,  the  helmet,  the  mant- 
ling, and  the  crest,  and  motto  of  the  family  of  Athol,  which  the  reader  may  be 
pleased  to  peruse  m  this  Appendix;  the  eight  on  each  side  of  the  escutcheon  are 
IS  follow : 

(n)  Balcarras's  Memoirf,  MS.  penes  me. 


APPENDIX. 


Marquis  of  Athol,  Earl  of  Derby, 

Earl  of  Bieadalbane,  Duke  de  Tremouille, 

Stewart  Earl  of  Athol.  Earl  of  Oxford, 

Lord  Sinclair,  Prince  d'Orange, 

Earl  of  Perth,  Earl  of  Cumberland, 

Lord  Ruthven,  Duke  de  Montmorency, 

Earl  of  Gowrie,  Earl  of  Exeter, 

Cockburn  of  Ormiston,  Duke  de  Montpensicr. 

The  Marquis  of  Athol  married  a  lady  of  the  most  noble  illustrious  rank  and' 
quality  of  any  in  Europe,  I  mean  of  a  subject,  the  Lady  Emelia  Stanley,  daughter 
of  James  Earl  of  Derby,  of  the  kingdom  of  England,  by  the  Lady  Charlotte,  his 
wife,  daughter  of  Claud  Duke  de  Tremouille,  a  duke  and  peer  of  France. 

By  this  most  noble  alliance  and  match  Sir  William  Dugdale,  in  the  Baronage 
of  England,  takes  notice  that  the  Earl  of  Derby's  children  are  related  in  blood  and 
kindred  by  the  mother  to  the  Houses  of  Bourbon  and  Austria,  to  the  Kings  of 
Spain  and  France,  the  Duke  of  Savoy,  the  Prince  of  Orange,  and  to  most  of  the. 
crowned  heads  in  Europe ;  and  now  that  all  the  descendants  of  both  sexes  of 
James  Earl  of  Derby,  and  Emelia  Countess  of  Derby,  his  wife,  are  worn  out,  and 
extinguished  at  the  writing  of  this  memorial,  excepting  the  children  and  descen-. 
dants  of  the  Lady  Marchioness  of  Athol,  all  that  great  and  uncommon  race  of 
i«oyal  and  illustrious  blood  centres  in  the  descendants  of  the  Marquis  of  Athol,  and 
the  Lady  Emelia,  his  wife,  aforesaid,  who  were 

John,  their  eldest  son,  and  the  heir  of  the  family,  thereafter  Duke  of  Athol. 

Charles  Earl  of  Dunmore,  the  second  son,  who  was  raised  to  that  honour  by 
King  James  VU. 

Lord  James  Murray,  the  third  son,  who  was  designed  of  Doually,  and,  as  a 
baron,  represented  the  county  of  Perth  in  the  House  of  Commons  of  Great  Bri- 
tain. 

Lord  William  Murray,  the  fourth  son,  who  having  married  Margaret,  the 
only  daughter  and  sole  heir  of  Sir  Robert  Nairn  of  Strathurd,  one  of  the  Senators 
of  the  College  of  Justice,  and  one  of  the  Commissioners  of  Justiciary,  was  upoa 
that  created  Lord  Nairn  for  life,  and  the  fee  of  the  honour  to  descend  to  the  Mar- 
quis of  Athol's  son,  who  should  marry  the  Lord  Nairn's  daughter  («). 

Lord  Edward  Murray,  the  fifth  son. 

Lord  MuNGo  Murray,  the  sixth  son,  who  died  in  that  glorious  expedition  of 
Scotland  to  Darien,  anno  1697. 

Lady  Emelia,  the  only  daughter,  wae  married  to  Hugh  Lord  Eraser  of  Lovat, 
and  had  issue. 

John,  Marquis,  thereafter  Duke  of  Athol,  succeeded  his  father  in  the  estate  and 
honour  of  the  family,  which  were  raised  higher  in  the  person  of  his  Grace  the 
Duke  of  Athol :  his  Grace  was  a  man  of  great  parts,  but  far  greater  virtues;  of  "a 
lively  apprehension,  a  clear  and  ready  judgment,  a  copious  eloquence,  and  of  a  very 
considerable  degree  of  good  understanding. 

In  the  lifetime  of  his  father  the  Marquis,  he  came  early  into  the  revolution,  and 
soon  declared  for  the  Prince  of  Orange.  The  merit  of  this  service,  together  with 
the  relation  his  Lordship  had  the  honour  to  stand  to  his  Highness  in  blood,  soon 
brought  him  into  a  degree  of  confidence  and  favour  that  was  very  particular.  He 
had  the  command  of  a  regiment  of  foot,  but  his  genius  being  more  adapted  to 
the  cabinet  than  the  field,  his  Majesty  King  William  was  pleased  to  make  him 
one  of  the  Principal  Secretaries  of  State,  in  conjunction  with  Mr  Ogilvie,  after- 
wards Earl  of  Seafield  and  Findlater,  aiino  1696;  much  about  the  same  time  he 
was  created  a  Peer  by  the  title  of  Earl  of  Tullibardin  (i),  by  letters  patent, 
bearing  date  the  27th  of  July  1697,  and  named  Pligh  Commissioner  to  represent  his 
majesty's  person  in  the  sixth  session  of  Parliament,  which  sat  down  at  Edinburgh 
the  8th  of  September  the  year  1697  aforesaid,  wherein  I  see  it  remarked  that  every 

(a)  Charta  in  publicis  archivis.         (A)  Patent  recorded  in  the  chancery  office. 

Vol.  IL  6  L. 


1^8  APPENDIX. 

thing  the  court  asked  was  granted,  and  all  acted  with  great  unanimity  (c) :  but 
the  Earl  of  Tullibardin  being  a  person  who  had  the  honour  and  prosperity  of  his 
country  much  more  at  heart  than  any  private  consideration  of  his  own,  and  by 
this  time  clearly  perceiving,  if  he  continued  in  the  ministry,  that  he  behoved  to  enter 
into  measures  that  would  bring  his  country  into  a  slavish  dependence  on  England, 
and  give  way  to  ruin  the  national  project  of  the  African  Company  settled  at  Da- 
rien,  he  would  go  no  farther  on  with  the  court ;  so  he  laid  down  all  his  public 
posts  and  employments,  and  retired  from  the  scene.  I  have  been  well  assured, 
from  persons  I  could  well  trust,  and  had  no  design  to  impose  on  me,  that  it  was 
not  the  disappointment  the  Earl  of  Tullibardin  met  with  in  recommending  a  friend 
of  his  to  a  high  post,  that  was  the  root  of  his  disgust  at  the  court ;  that  arose 
from  another  consideration ;  it  was  the  scheme  he  saw  laid  down  of  bringing  us  in- 
to a  dependence  on  England,  as  we  have  observed ;  and  that  which  brought  it 
sooner  on  was  the  king's  disowning  the  African  Company,  from  which  it  was  ex- 
pected great  riches  would  flow  into  the  kingdom;  and  this  sruck  him  as  a  gene- 
rous patriot,  who  preferred  the  honour  and  interest  of  his  country  to  any  regard 
of  his  own  concerns;  and  he  stood  at  a  distance  from  the  court  so  long  as  King 
William  lived. 

Upon  the  accession  of  her  Majesty  Queen  Anne  to  the  throne  of  these  realms, 
no  man  in  the  nation  was  more  overjoyed  to  see  one  of  the  race  of  Stewarts 
wearing  the  crown  than  the  Earl  of  Tullibardin  :  her  majesty  was  graciously 
pleased  to  bring  him  to  the  Privy  Council,  and  to  make  his  Lordship  Privy  Seal(rf) 
in  place  of  the  Duke  of  Queensberry,  who  was  named  Commissioner  to  the  new 
Parliament  that  was  indicted  to  sit  down  on  the  6th  of  May  1703,  wherein  he 
did  the  Qiieen  so  acceptable  service,  that  to  countenance  and  reward  his  consum- 
mated merit,  her  majesty  was  graciously  pleased  to  create  him  (being  now  Mar- 
quis of  Athol  by  the  demise  of  his  father)  Duke  of  Athol,  by  letters  patent  bear- 
ing date  the  third  of  April  1704  (f);  and  soon  thereafter  his  Grace  was  elected  and 
installed  one  of  the  Knights  Companions  of  the  Most  Ancient  and  Most  Noble  Or- 
der of  the  Thistle.  His  Grace  did  not  long  continue  Privy  Seal;  for  the  next  en- 
suing year  her  majesty  having  thought  fit  for  her  service  to  change  her  ministry, 
the  Duke  of  Athol  was  removed  from  his  office,  and  the  Earl  of  Rothes  got  the 
Privy  Seal, 

In  the  Parliament  1706,  when  the  Treaty  of  Union  came  to  be  considered,  his 
Grace  the  Duke  of  Athol  argued  vehemently  against  the  whole  frame  of  it,  as 
contrary  to  the  fundamental  laws  and  the  whole  constitution  of  our  government, 
which  he  thought  the  Parliament  had  no  power  to  alter.  In  the  progress  of  the 
debates  on  this  subject,  he  spoke  and  argued  with  such  force  and  strength  of  rea- 
soning, that  made  a  very  great  impression  on  all  those  who  heard  him,  and  creat- 
ed in  all  people  a  very  high  esteem  of  him.  The  topics  from  which  his  Grace 
the  Duke  of  Athol  drew  the  arguments  against  the  Union,  were  the  antiquity  and 
and  dignity  of  the  kingdom,  which  were  now  offered  to  be  given  up :  they  were 
now  departing  from  an  independent  state,  and  going  to  sink  in  a  dependence  on 
England ;  what  conditions  soever  might  be  now  speciously  offered  as  a  security  to 
them,  they  could  not  expect  they  should  be  adhered  to,  or  religiously  maintained 
in  a  parliament  where  sixteen  peers  and  forty-five  commoners  could  not  hold  the 
balance  against  above  an  hundred  peers,  and  five  hundred  and  thirteen  commoners : 
It  was  visible  that  the  nobility  suffered  a  great  diminution,  if  not  a  forfaulture  by 
it  ;  for  though  they  agreed  that  the  Peers  of  Scotland  should  enjoy  all  the  other 
privileges  of  the  Peers  of  England,  yet  the  greatest  of  them  all  was  denied  them, 
which  was  sitting  and  voting  in  the  House  of  Lords,  and  their  being  restrained  to 
sixteen,  to  be  elected  by  the  rest  at  every  new  Parliament.  In  debating  almost 
every  single  article,  his  Grace  spoke  against  them  with  great  boldness,  and  so  much 
caution,  that  though  he  provoked  the  courtiers  extremely,  no  advantage  could  be 
taken  against  him ;  and  though  every  question  was  carried  in  favour  of  the  treaty, 
yet  his  Grace,  to  exoner  his  own  conscience,  and  to  leave  behind  him  to  posterity 

{c)  History  of  the  times.  (</)  Gift  to  be  Lord  Privy  Seal  to  John  Earl  of  Tullibardin,  the  8th  of 
December  1702.     (e)  Charta  in  archivis,  ad  annum  1704. 


APPENDIX.  199 

what  his  thoughts  and  sentimeius  in  that  affair  were,  before  the  vote  was  carried  in 
the  House,  he  either  protested  himself  against  the  article,  or  adhered  to  the  other 
members  who  joined  with  his  Grace  in  the  opposition  by  some  of  the  members  of 
every  state. 

After  this  his  Grace  the  Duke  of  Athol  lived  most  part  privately  in  the  country, 
in  the  splendour  and  ceremony  of  a  prince,  tdl  the  1 716,  that  William  Marquis  of 
Tullibardin,  then  his  eldest  son  and  heir  apparent,  being  unhappily  seduced  in- 
to the  rebellion  the  year  before,  and  upon  that,  by  an  act  of  Parliament  (passed 
in  the  first  year  of  the  reign  of  his  late  Majesty  King  George  I.)  attainted  of  high 
treason :  upon  this  his  Grace  went  up  to  court,  was  graciously  received  by  his  ma- 
jesty ;  he  laid  his  case  before  the  king,  representing  the  unhappy  circumstances  of 
his  eldest  son,  and  what  effect  and  influence  that  might  have  in  the  event  of  his 
own  death  on  the  succession  of  his  family,  if  his  estate  and  honour  were  not 
vested  by  law  upon  his  second  son  Lord  James  Murray,  who  had  rendered  his 
majesty  very  considerable  services  during  the  time  of  the  late  rebellion.  His 
majesty  having  duly  advised  the  duke's  petition,  was  graciously  pleased  to  order  a 
bill  to  be  brought  in  that  same  session  of  Parliament,  for  vesting  the  honours  and 
estate  of  John  Duke  of  Athol  in  James  Murray,  Esq.  commonly  called  Lord 
James  Murray,  after  the  death  of  the  said  Duke,  his  father,  reciting,  That  the 
said  John  Duke  of  Athol,  and  the  said  James  Murray,  Esq.  commonly  called 
Lord  James  Murray,  second  son  to  the  said  John  Duke  of  Athol,  had  constantly 
adhered  to  his  majesty,  and  rendered  him  considerable  services;  and  as  a  reward  of 
their  steady  loyalty,  his  majesty  was  most  graciously  pleased  to  give  his  royal  as- 
sent for  a  bill  to  be  brought  in,  that  the  honours,  titles,  and  estate  of  the  said  John 
Duke  of  Athol,  should,  after  his  death,  be  continued  in  his  family.  Accordingly  a 
law  passed,  whereby  it  was  enacted,  that  the  act  of  attainder  of  William  Marquis 
of  Tullibardin  should  not  extend,  or  be  construed  to  extend,  to  prevent  any  descent 
of  honour  or  estate  from  the  said  Duke  of  Athol  to  the  said  Lord  James  Murray 
and  his  issue,  but  that  all  and  every,  the  honours,  titles,  and  estate  whatsoever  of 
the  said  John  Duke  of  Athol,  should,  from  and  after  his  death,  descend,  and  come 
to  and  be  held  and  enjoyed  by  the  said  James  Murray,  Esq.  and  his  issue,  in  such 
manner  as  the  same  would  have  descended,  and  come  to  and  been  enjoyed  by  him 
and  them,  in  case  the  said  William  Murray  had  not  been  attainted  of  treason,  and 
had  died  without  issue  in  the  lifetime  of  the  said  John  Duke  of  Athol.  According- 
ly on  the  death  of  his  Grace  the  Duke  of  Athol,  in  virtue  of  this  act  of  Parlia- 
ment, his  son  James,  now  Duke  of  Athol,  did  succeed  his  father  m  his  honours, 
title,  and  estate,  anno  1724. 

John  Duke  of  Athol  married  first  the  Lady  Katharine  Hamilton,  eldest  daugh- 
ter of  William  and  Anne  Duke  and  Dutchess  of  Hamilton,  a  lady  of  incom- 
parable prudence,  and  a  singular  example  of  virtue  and  piety,  by  whom  he  had 
issue, 

John  Marquis  of  Tullibardin,  who  was  of  great  hopes  and  expectations:  he  was 
slam  at  the  battle  of  Mons,  the  31st  of  August  1709,  to  the  great  affliction  of  the 
Duke,  his  father,  and  all  his  noble  relations. 

William  Marquis  of  Tullibardin,  who  was  attainted  by  act  of  Parliament  in  1715 
for  being  accessory  to  the  rebellion. 

Lord  James  Murray,  now  his  Grace  the  present  Duke  of  Athol. 

Lord  Charles  Murray  who  died  young. 

Lord  George  Murray  of  Glencarse. 

Lord  Basil  Murray  died  young. 

Lady  Susane,  the  Duke's  only  daughter  of  his  first  marriage,  was  married  to 
William  the  present  Earl  of  Aberdeen,  and  had  issue. 

His  Grace  the  Duke  married,  to  his  second  wife,  Mary,  daughter  of  William  Lord 
Ross  of  Halkhead,  by  whom  he  had  issue  two  sons  and  a  daughter,  viz. 

Lord  John  Murray  of  Pitnacree,  Lieutenant-Colonel  in  the  third  regiment  of 
his  Majesty's  Guards,  commanded  by  the  Earl  of  Dunmore,  and  is  a  member  of  Par- 
liament for  the  county  of  Perth. 

Lord  Freder-ck.  IN'Iurray  who  is  in  the  navy. 

Lady  Mary  Murray. 


200  APPENDIX. 

To  John  Duke  of  Athol  succeeded  James  Duke  of  Athol  his  son,  by  virtue  ot 
the  act  of  Parliament  vesting  the  estate  and  honours  of  the  family  in  him,  upon 
the  demise  of  his  father,  as  has  been  observed  in  this  memorial.  His  Grace  having 
all  possible  regard  for  his  illustrious  family,  and  that  it  might  continue  in  lustre, 
but  withal  apprehending,  that,  by  the  words  of  the  former  act  of  Parliament,  it 
might  be  doubtful  whether,  upon  failure  of  his  Grace,  and  the  heirs-male  of  his 
body,  the  honours,  titles,  and  estate  would  continue  in  the  family,  and  descend  to 
the  late  Duke's  other  sons,  his  Grace's  brothers,  and  whether  his  Grace  and  his  is- 
sue, and  heirs-male  of  the  late  Duke  of  Athol,  may  take  and  enjoy  any  title  or 
estate  that  may  descend,  or  come  to  him  or  them  by  collateral  descent,  as  they 
would  have  done,  or  might  do,  if  Wilham  Murray,  commonly  called  Marquis  of 
Tullibardin,  had  not  been  attainted,  and  died  without  issue  in  the  late  Duke's 
lifetime  ;  upon  this  his  Grace  went  up  to  court,  and  laid  his  case  before  his  present 
majesty,  praying  that  a  bill  might  be  brought  into  Parliament,  to  explain  and 
amend  the  former  act,  for  vesting  the  honours  and  estate  of  the  House  of  Athol  in 
his  Grace's  own  person;  which,  at  the  humble  suit  and  request  of  the  Duke,  was 
allowed  to  be  brought  in,  and  an  act  passed  thereon  by  the  king's  most  excellent 
majesty,  by  and  with  the  consent  of  the  Lords  Spiritual  and  Temporal  and  Com- 
mons in  this  present  Parliament  assembled,  and  by  the  authority  of  the  samen, 
that  the  attainder  of  William  Murray,  called  Marquis  of  Tullibardin,  shall  not  ex- 
tend, or  be  construed  to  extend,  to  prevent  any  descent  of  honour  or  estate  to 
James  Duke  of  Athol  and  his  issue,  or  to  any  of  the  issue  or  heirs-male  of  John  late 
Duke  of  Athol,  (other  than  the  said  William  Murray  and  his  issue),  but  that  all 
honours,  titles,  and  estate  whatsoever,  shall,  and  may  descend,  and  come  to  and 
be  held  and  enjoyed  by  him  and  them,  in  case  the  said  William  Murray  had  not 
been  attainted,  and  had  died  without  issue  in  the  lifetime  of  John,  late  Duke,  his 
i^ither  («). 

The  Duke  of  Athol  having,  by  his  majesty's  special  grace  and  favour,  got  this 
point  settled,  that  was  of  the  greatest  consequence  to  his  family,  he  was  imme- 
diately, on  the  back  of  this,  taken  into  a  very  high  and  particular  favour :  he  was 
first,  by  the  countenance  of  the  court,  elected  one  of  the  sixteen  peers  for  Scotland, 
to  sit  in  the  House  of  Peers  of  Great  Britain  in  a  vacancy  through  the  demise  of 
John  Earl  of  Sutherland,  the  21st  of  September  1733  {b):  After  that  his  Grace 
rose  quickly  to  be  Privy  Seal,  one  of  the  Knights  of  the  Most  Noble  Order  of  St 
Andrew,  one  of  the  Lords  of  his  Majesty's  Most  Honourable  Privy  Council,  and 
chosen  one  of  the  sixteen  peers  for  Scotland  to  the  present  Parliament  of  Great 
Britain. 

Upon  the  demise  of  James  Earl  of  Derby  on  the  first  of  February  1735,  his  Grace 
succeeded  as  heir  of  line  and  at  law  to  that  most  noble  and  illustrious  family :  But 
though  the  title,  honour,  and  estate  of  the  Derby  family  went  to  Sir  Edward 
Stanley,  the  heir-male,  yet  his  Grace  the  Duke  of  Athol  got  the  lordship  of  Man  and 
the  isles,  and  the  peerage  of  Lord  Strange.  In  the  case,  as  set  forth  in  the  petition 
to  his  majesty,  by  his  Grace  James  Duke  of  Athol,  Lord  of  Man  and  the  Isles, 
claiming  the  barony  of  Strange,  it  makes  mention  that  his  majesty  King  Henry 
VII.  in  the  first  year  of  his  reign,  created  Thomas  Lord  Stanley  Earl  of  Derby  ; 
that  the  same  title  and  dignity  came  by  male  descent  to  Ferdinando  Earl  of  Derby, 
who  left  three  daughters  and  no  son  ;  that  the  title  and  dignity  of  Earl  of  Derby 
came  to  William,  brother  of  the  said  Ferdinando,  as  heir-male  of  the  body  of  the 
said  Thomas ;  but  the  said  William  was  never  seased  of  the  title  or  dignity  of  a 
baron  ;  that  James  Earl  of  Derby,  the  duke's  ancestor,  whose  heir  he  is,  eldest 
son  of  the  said  William,  was  summoned  to  Parhament  in  the  third  year  of  the 
reign  of  King  Charles  I.  as  a  baron,  the  writ  being  directed  Jacobo  Strange,  che- 
valier, and  being  also  summoned  to  several  Parliaments  in  the  said  King's  reign, 
sat  and  voted  by  the  said  title  of  Lord  Strange  in  the  lifetime  of  the  said  William 
Earl  of  Derby  his  father;  that,  upon  the  death  of  the  said  William  Earl  of  Derby, 
the  said  James  Lord  Strange  succeeded  to  the  title  and  dignity  of  Earl  of  Derby, 

(«■)  Bill  for  explaining  and  amending  an  act  passed  in  the  first  year  of  his  late  majesty  King  George  I. 
for  vesting  the  honours  and  estate  of  Jolm  Duke  of  Athol  in  Lord  James  Murray  his  second  son.  {h)  Se 
derunt  of  the  election  of  peers. 


APPENDIX.  201 

and  died  seased  thereof  to  him  and  tlie  heirs-male  of  the  body  of  the  said  Thomas . 
Earl  of  Derby,  and  of  the  said  title  and  dignity  of  Lord  Strange  to  him  and  his 
heirs ;  that  the  said  title  and  dignity  of  Lord  Strange  came  by  male  descent  to  the 
late  Earl  of  Derby,  who  died  without  issue  in  the  month  of  February  J735  ;  that 
the  Duke  of  Athol,  the  petitioner,  is  cousin  and  next  heir  to  the  ^aid  late  Earl  of 
Derby,  and  great  grandson  and  sole  heir  of  the  said  James  Lord  Strange,  after- 
wards Earl  of  Derby,  and  consequently  entitled  to  the  dignity  of  a  baron,  created 
by  writ  of  summons,  in  virtue  of  which  the  said  Lord- Strange  sat  and  voted  in 
Parliament. 

These  points  of  fact  were  so  fully  proved,  and  the  point  of  law  so  clearly  esta- 
blished, that  the  authorities  could  not  be  controverted,  and  therefore  the  House  of 
Peers  allowed  the  duke's  claim  to  the  peerage  of  Strange,  as  great  grandson  to 
James  Lord  Strange  and  Earl  of  Derby,  who  was  created  by  writ  of  summons  in 
the  year  1628  (f).  as  is  said,  and  whose  heir  his  Grace  the  Duke  of  Athol  is. 

His  Grace  the  Duke  of  Athol  being  heir  of  line  to  the  illustrious  House  of  the 
Earls  of  Derby  and  Lord  of  Man,  it  might  perhaps,  with  abundance  of  reason,  be 
expected  that  we  should  even  in  this  memorial  run  out  a  little  on  the  antiquity, 
lustre,  splendour,  and  nobihty  of  the  Stanley  family,  but  that  would  be  to  cite  a 
great  part  of  the  History  of  England,  and  to  transcribe  a  great  many  pages  of  the 
baronage  of  that  kingdom  (d),  all  which  we  shall  wave,  since  this  paper  has  dwelt 
fully  as  much,  if  not  more,  than  at  first  was  intended  :  We  beg  leave  only  briefly 
to  take  notice,  that  King  Henry  IV.  of  England,  in  the  1405,  gave  to  John  Lord 
Stanley,  the  ancestor  of  his  Grace  the  Duke  of  Athol,  the  Isle  of  Man,  with  the 
Castle  and  Pecle,  and  all  the  isles  adjacent ;  as  also  all  the  regalities,  franchises, 
and  rights  thereunto  belonging,  and  patronage  of  the  bishopric  (c),  to  be  held 
of  the  king,  his  heirs  and  successors,  by  homage,  and  the  service  of  two  falcons  on 
the  day  of  their  coronation  :  But  because  the  Kings  of  Scotland  claimed  a  right  to 
the  Isle  of  Man,  the  Earls  of  Derby,  Lords  of  Man,  were  obliged  to  keep  a  con- 
stant standing  army  and  garrisons  for  the  defence  of  it,  till  the  reign  of  our  King 
James  VI.  of  Scotland  and  the  first  of  England,  that  all  former  hostilities  betwixt 
the  two  nations  ceased,  and  came  to  an  end  upon  the  union  of  the  crowns  in  the 
king's  royal  person,  anno  1603;  and  in  the  honourable  family  of  Derby,  and  their 
heirs,  the  lordship  of  Man  and  the  Isles  has  continued  ever  since,  except  for  twelve 
years  during  the  civil  war,  when  it  was  given  to  General  Fairfax  the  Lord  Came- 
ron, but  was  returned  to  its  ancient  lords  at  the  Restoration  of  the  king  in  the 
1660.  I  shall  only  further  observe,  that  though  there  were,  in  the  more  ancient 
times,  Kings  of  Man,  yet  the  lords  of  it,  both  when  it  belonged  to  the  crown  of 
Scotland,  and  since  it  came  to  the  crown  of  England,  have  w  aved  the  title  of  kings, 
and  now  are  only  stiled  Lords  of  Man  and  the  Isles,  though  they  have  most  of  the 
regalia;  as  the  giving  the  final  assent  to  all  new  laws,  and  the  power  of  pardoning 
offenders,  of  changing  the  sentence  of  death  into  banishment,  of  appointing  and 
placing  the  governor  and  officers,  with  a  right  to  all  forfaultures  for  treason,  felony, 
Felo  de  se,  &c. 

I  shall  conclude  with  the  opinion  of  all  the  great  lawyers  in  England  who  have 
had  occasion  to  mention  the  Isle  of  Man  viz.  that  it  is  a  royal  fief  of  the  crown  of 
England,  and  the  only  one  :  So  that  I  may  venture  to  say,  without  censure,  that 
if  his  Grace  the  Duke  of  Athol  is  not  the  richest  subject  the  King  of  Britain  has, 
he  is  the  greatest  man  in  his  majesty's  dominions. 

His  Grace  was  maiTied,  in  the  1726,  to  Jean  Frederick,  now  Dutchess  of  Athol, 
%vho  brought  with  her  a  considerable  fortune :  The  first  accounts  we  have  of  lier 
Grace's  family  is,  that  her  great-grandfather  John  came  from  the  Palatinate  in  the 
reign  of  Qiieen  Elizabeth,  and  was  physician  to  her  majesty.  His  son  John  Fre- 
derick was  Lord  Mayor  of  London  the  year  King  Charles  was  restored,  and  was 
then  knighted  by  his  majesty,  presented  the  city  presents  to  Qiieen  Katharine,  and 

(c)  Case  of  James  Dake  of  Athol,  Lord  of  Mm  and  the  Isles,  as  set  forth  in  his  petition  to  his  ma- 
jesty, claiming  the  peerage  of  Strange.  (</)  Dugdale's  Baronage  of  England.  (/)  Dr  Gibson,  the  Lord 
Bishop  of  London,  in  his  new  edition  of  Camden's  Britannia,  and  Bishop  Wilson's  Account  of  the  Isle 
of  Man. 

Vol.  II.  6  M 


202  APPENDIX. 

died  father  of  the  city,  leaving  an  only  son,  Thomas,  father  to  her  Grace  by 
Leonora  Mariscoe,  who  was  one  of  the  greatest  fortunes  in  England  at  that  time, 
whose  predecessors  came  originally  from  Normandy,  and  were  of  very  considerable 
account  in  that  country. 


Memorial  of  the  Viscount  of  STORMONT,  Lord  SCONE,  and  Lord  BAL- 
VAIRD,  COCKPOOL,  and  LOCHMABEN. 


THE  barony  of  Arngosk,  alias  Forgey,  in  the  county  of  Fife,  though  it  has 
been  possessed  by  the  Murrays  for  many  ages  past,  yet,  in  the  more  ancient  times, 
that  estate  belonged  to  gentlemen  of  the  surname  of  Friseley.  This  is  vouched 
and  instructed  by  a  donation  which  Gilbertiis  de  Friseley,  Dominus  de  Forgey  made, 
"  Deo  et  ecclesis  beatae  Mariae  de  Cambuskenneth,  et  ibidem  canonicis  deo  ser- 
"  vientibus,  illam  partem  terrae  quas  jacet  propinquior  domui,  quae  est  sacerdotis 
"  in  territorio  de  Arngosk,  una  cum  jure  patronatus  ecclesia3  de  Arngosk."  The 
deed  is  confirmed  by  William,  bishop  of  St  Andrews,  die  Mercurii  proxima  post 
festum  exahationis  snnctce  'crucis,  1281  (^?).  There  we  meet  with  Henricus  de 
Friseley  Dominus  de  Forgey,  who  gave  to  the  abbot  and  convent  of  Cambuskenneth 
molendinum  de  Arngosk  pro  salute  animce  sua  (b).  This  donation  bears  date  sexto 
calendas  Augusti  1295.  After  Henry  de  Friseley  there  is  Willielmus  de  Friseley,  miles, 
Dominus  de  Forgey,  who  ratifies  the  deed  of  his  predecessor  of  the  miln  of  Arngosk, 
to  the  convent  of  Cambuskenneth,  which  is  ratified  by  a  charter  under  the  Great 
Seal  of  King  Robert  I.  at  Glasgow,  decirno  die  Junii,  anno  regni  sui  nono,  that  is 
the  year  of  our  Lord  1316(f).  From  the  family  of  the  Friseleys  the  barony  of 
Arngosk,  et  dominium  de  Forgey,  as  it  is  called  in  the  record,  was  transferred  by 
the  marriage  of  the  heir-female  to  the  Barclays  of  Kippo,  a  branch  of  the  once 
great  and  powerful  family  of  the  Barclays  Lords  of  Brichen,  which  terminated  in  an 
heir-female,  who  was  married  to  Walter  Stewart  Earl  of  Strathern,  Athol,  and  Caith- 
ness, one  of  the  younger  sons  of  King  Robert  IL  (rf).  The  family  of  the  Barclays 
of  Kippo  and  Arngosk  subsisted  a  long  while  in  honour  and  lustre,  till  the  reign 
of  King  James  IV.  that  James  Barclay,  son  and  heir  of  another  James  Barclay  of 
Kippo,  died  without  issue-male,  and  left  only  one  daughter,  his  sole  heir,  Mar- 
garet Barclay  doniina  de  Arngosk  et  Balvaird,  who  brought  her  estate  to  her  hus- 
band Sir  Andrew  Murray,  second  son  of  Sir  William  Murray  of  TuUibardin,  pa- 
ternal ancestor  to  the  present  Duke  of  Athol  (t-),  in  the  1499,  at  least  that  is  the 
first  time  I  have  found  him  first  designed  of  Arngosk,  and  Dame  Margaret  Bar- 
clay his  wife,  nepoti  et  baredi  quondam  Jacobi  Barclaii  de  Kippo.  That  she  was 
sprung  from,  and  descended  of  the  ancient  Lords  of  Arngosk  and  Forgey,  is  instruct- 
ed from  a  deed  I  have  seen  (/),  in  which  she  is  designed  hares  quondam  Henrici 
de  Friseley  domina  d^  Arngosk  et  Forgey  ;  it  is  dated  the  2d  of  December  15 13  (_f). 
This  lady,  on  the  24th  of  January  1507,  resigns  in  the  hands  of  King  James  IV. 
her  whole  estate  for  new  infeftment  to  herself,  and  Sir  Andrew  Murray,  her  spouse, 
in  liferent,  and  the  fee  to  the  heirs  procreated  betwixt  them  :  Upon  the  marriage 
of  Sir  Andrew  Murray  with  Dame  Margaret  Barclay  he  did  not  quarter  the  coat 
of  arms  of  the  Barclays  with  the  paternal  bearing  of  the  Murrays,  but  chose 
rather  to  compose  them  by  placing  the  cross  patee,  the  figures  in  the  armorial 
bearing  of  the  Barclays,  in  the  centre  of  the  shield  betwixt  the  three  mullets,  as 
may  be  seen  on  the  south  aisle,  of  the  collegiate  church  of  TuUibardin,  which  has 

(a)  Charta  Cambuskenneth  in  Bibl.  jurid.  (b)  Ibidem.  (c)  Chartulary  of  Cambuskenneth. 
("//)  Charta  in  publicis  archivis,  ad  annum  1373.  f(?_)  Charta  penes  dorainum  Dmmmond.  (/)  Chai- 
ta  Cambuskenneth.     {g)  Ibidem. 


APPENDIX.  205 

been  founded  by  this  gentleman,  after  he  became  possessed  of  the  estates  of  Ari;- 
gosk,  Balvaird,  and  Kippo. 

This  lady  Dame  Margaret  Baiclay,  Lady  Arngosk,  with  consent  of  Sir  Andrew 
Murray  her  husband,  and  Sir  David  Murray  her  son  and  heir  apparent,  both 
knights,  founds,  and  endows  a  chaplainry  in  the  parish  church  of  Arngosk,  "  In 
"  honorem  Dei  et  sanctse  individuac  Trinitatis,  Patris,  Filii,  et  Spiritus  Sancti,  et 
"  beatae  Maria;,  et  beatx  Columbce,  patronas  ecclesiae  de  Arngobk,"  of  an  an- 
nuity of  fourteen  merks  and  two  acres  of  land  lying  contiguous  to  the  church  (h), 
"  pro  prosperitate  serenissimi  principis  Jacobi  Qiiinti  regis  Scotorum  ;"  also  for  the 
health  and  welfare  of  themselves,  their  heirs  and  successors,  "  et  omnium  fidelium  de- 
"  functorum."  This  charter  of  mortification  bears  date,  apud  castrum  nostrum  de  Bal- 
vaird, prima  die  mensis  j^itgusti  1527  (/).  This  Sir  Andrew  Murray  left  issue  by 
Dame  Margaret  Barclay  his  wife  aforesaid. 

Sir  David  Murray,  his  eldest  son  and  successor, 

John  Murray  of  Conland  (X;)  which  lands  he   held  in  vassallage  of  the  family, 

Elizabeth  a  daughter,  who  was  married  to  Sir  Archibald  Douglas  ofKilspindy  (/). 

Sir  David  Murray  of  Arngosk,  the  second  in  the  line  of  this  noble  family, 
made  an  alliance  in  marriage  with  the  House  of  Lindsay  ;  for  he  married  Dame 
Janet  Lindsay,,  daughter  of  John  Lord  Lindsay  of  the  Byres,  ancestor  to  the  pre- 
sent Earl  of  Crawford,  by  Dame  Helen  Stewart  his  wife,  daughter  of  John  Earl  of 
Athol  (/«),  by  whom  he  had  issue  three  sons,  viz. 

Sir  Andrew  Murray  the  heir  of  the  family. 

William  Murray  of  Letterbanachy,  the  second  son,  and  the  paternal  ancestor 
of  the  present  Viscount  of  Stormont  (/;),  of  whom  afterwards. 

David  Murray,  portioner  of  Aiideth,  the  third  son  (c).  This  Sir  David  Mur- 
ray of  Arngosk  died  in  the  month  of  September  1550  {p),  and  was  succeeded  by 
his  son  and  heir, 

Sir  Andrew  Murray  of  Arngosk,  who  we  find,  from  a  very  authentic  deed 
and  voucher,  was  one  of  the  gentlemen  that  were  on  the  assize  of  Alexander  Earl 
of  Huntly,  when  he  was  condemned,  after  his  death,  for  the  rebelhon  he  had 
headed  at  the  battle  of  Corrichie,  anno   1563. 

In  the  1547  he  married  Dame  Janet  Graham,  daughter  of  William,  the  second 
Earl  of  the  illustrious  House  of  Montrose,  by  Dame  Janet  Keith  his  lady,  who 
was  daughter  of  Wmiam  Earl  Marischal  of  Scotland  {q)  ;  by  this  lady  he  had 
issue, 

Sir  David  Murray  of  Gospertie,  his  second  son,  who  was  raised  first  to  the  ho- 
nour of  Lord  Sc  ne,  and  after  that  to  the  dignity  of  Viscount  of  Stormont ;  of 
whom  in  the  sequel  of  this  memorial. 

Mr  Robert  Murray,  the  third  son,  who  was  bred  to  the  service  of  the  church, 
and  had  the  benefice  of  the  arch-deanry  of  Dunkeld  bestowed  on  him,  by  the 
bounty  and  favour  of  King  James  VI.  the  better  to  enable  him,  as  tlie  narrative 
and  preamble  of  the  gift  bears,  to  prosecute  and  carry  on  his  studies  in  the  view 
of  serving  in  the  church  (;),  but  he  died  without  any  succession. 

Sir  Patrick  Murray,  the  fourth  son,  was  designed  of  Byn  and  Drumcairn,  and 
was  lieutenant  of  his  majesty's  guard,  and  was  a  bold  brisk  man,  frequently  em- 
ployed by  the  king  in  the  affairs  of  the  church  ;  more  especially  as  to  the  settling 
episcopacy,  to  which  the  brethren  were  not  a  little  averse  (j).  He  married  Dame 
Isabel  Blair  of  the  House  of  Balthayock  in  Perthshire,  but  he  died  without  suc- 
cession in  the  1604,  and  his  estate  came  to  the  Lord  Scone  his  brother,  who  is 
served  heir  to  him  in  the  year  1607  (t). 

Sir  Andrew  Murray  of  Arngosk,  the  father,  died  in  anno  i^yG  (u),  and  was 
succeeded  by  his  son, 

Sir  Andrew  Murray  of  Arngosk,  who  was  one  of  the  gentlemen  of  the  bed-cham- 
ber to  King  James  VI.  and  in  a  very  considerable  degree  of  confidence  and  favour 
with  that  prince  (v).     This  gentleman  took  a  new  investiture  of  his  estate  to  him- 

{h)  Chartulary  of  Cambuskenneth.  {i)  Ibidem,  {t)  Ibidem.  (/^  Mr  Home's  History  of  the  Douglases. 
(m)  Charta  in  publicis  archivis,  ad  annum  1526.  (n;  Charta  penes  Jacobum  Murray  de  Abercairny. 
{o\  Charta  in  publicis  archivis,  ad  annum  1563.  (/>)  Charta  penes  Vicecomitem  de  Stormont,  etiam 
chaita  in  Rotulii  Reg.  Pari,  (q)  Charta  in  publicis  archivis,  ad  annum  1547.  ("r)  Ibidem,  ad  an- 
num I S84.  (s)  Spottiswood  and  Calderwood's  Ecclesiastical  Histories.  {!)  Rotul.  in  Cancellaria,  S. 
D.  N.  R.     (tt)  Chaita  penes  Vicecomitem  de  Stormont.     {v}  Charta  in  pubUcis  archivis. 


:-4  APPENDIX. 

self  in  liferent,  and  to  Andrew  IMurray,  his  son  and  heir  apparent  in  fee,  and  to 
the  heirs-male  of  his  body  ;  which  failing,  to  David  Murray  his  broiher-german, 
and  the  heirs-male  of  his  body,  and,  in  failure  of  these,  to  Roben  IVIurray  his 
brother-german,  and  to  the  heirs-male  of  his  body  ;  and  these  failing,  to  Patrick 
Murray  their  brother-gemian,  and  the  heirs-male  of  his  body ;  which  failing,  to 
David  Murray,  portioner  of  Airdeth,  his  uncle.  The  charter  is  expede  the  Great 
Seal  the  26th  of  September  1560  («).  In  this  substitution  it  is  pretty  odd,  that 
Sir  Andrew  Murray  of  Arngosk.  strikes  out  his  uncle  William  Murray  of  Letter- 
baiiachy,  and  his  issue-male  out  of  the  succession,  who  was  elder  than  David  Mur- 
ray of  Airdeth,  whom  he  substitutes  directly  and  immediately  after  his  own  bro- 
thers :  But  we  see,  that  some  time  after  this,  in  a  subsequent  settlement  of  the  estate 
of  the  family,  justice  is  done  to  David  Murray,  son  of  William  Murray  of  Letter- 
banachy,  and  he  is  reponed  in  his  due  room  and  right  of  succession  before  the  issue- 
male  of  his  uncle  David  Murray  of  Airdeth. 

This  Sir  Andrew  Murray  of  Arngosk  married  Margaret,  daughter  of  John  Crich- 
lon  of  Strathurd,  an  ancient  and  considerable  family  in  the  county  of  Perth ; 
her  mother  was  a  daughter  of  the  Lord  Ruthven's  family,  who  were  afterwards 
Earls  of  Gowrie  (6),  by  whom  he  had  Andrew  his  son  and  heir,  and  one  daugh- 
ter, Anne,  who  was  married  to  Sir  Mungo  Murray  the  second  Viscount  of  Stor- 
mont,  but  had  no  issue.  To  this  Sir  Andrew  Murray  of  Arngosk  succeeded  An- 
drew, his  son  and  heir,  who  was  the  first  of  the  family  that  relinquished  the  desig- 
nation of  Arngosk,  and  used  the  title  and  designation  of  Balvaird.  He  took  an 
investiture  of  his  estate,  and  is  stiled  Andreas  Murray  de  Balvaird,  fdius  H  hares 
quondam  domini  Andreae  Murray  de  Arngosk,  militis.  He  provides  his  whole  estate 
to  the  heirs-male  of  his  ov/n  body,  and  failing  these  to  Sir  David  Murray  of  Gos- 
pertie,  Knight,  his  Majesty's  Comptroller,  his  uncle,  and  to  the  heirs-male  of  his 
body  ;  which  failing,  to  Robert  Murray  his  uncle,  and  the  heirs-male  of  his 
body  ;  which  failing,  to  David  Murray  of  Balgonie,  his  father's  cousin-'german, 
son  of  William  Murray  of  Letterbanachy  ;  and  failing  his  heirs-male,  to  another 
cousin-german  of  his  father's,  Mr  WiUiam  Murray  of  Airdeth.  This  charter'bears 
date  the  8th  of  May  1604  (c).  This  gentleman  was  heir  apparent  to  the  Vis- 
count of  Stormont,  both  in  his  estate  and  title  of  honour.  He  married  Margaret, 
daughter  of  Sir  William  Monteith  of  Carse,  by  Dame  Helen  Bruce,  his  wife,  of 
the  House  of  Airth  :  But  he  died  without  issue  in  the  month  of  September  in 
the  year  1624,  so  that  his  estate  devolved  to  his  uncle,  David  Viscount  of  Stor- 
mont,  who  was  served  and  retoured  heir-male  to  his  nephew  some  short  time  there- 
after. 

Sir  David  Murray,  the  first  Viscount  of  Stormont,  was,  from,  his  youth,  bred 
at  the  Court  of  King  James  VI.  He  was  first  made  Cup-bearer  to  his  Majesty,  in 
which  employment  he  soon  rendered  himself  very  gracious  to  his  master,  inso- 
much, that  in  a  few  years  he  was  preferred  to  be  Master  of  the  Horse,  and  Captain 
of  the  Guard,  and  being  knighted,  was  made  Comptroller  of  the  Royal  Revenue 
in  the  1599,  upon  the  removal  of  Sir  David  Home  of  Wedderburn  from  the  of- 
fice (d).  In  this  station  he  served  his  majesty  with  great  diligence,  fideHty,  assi- 
duity, and  apphcation.  He  had  the  honour  to  be  attending  on  his  majesty  from 
the  palace  of  Falkland  to  the  town  of  Perth,  on  the  memorable  5th  of  August 
i6oo,  when  the  Earl  of  Gowrie  and  his  brother  Mr  Ruthven,  by  an  unparalleled 
attempt,  thought  to  have  embrued  their  hands  in  the  sacred  blood  of  the  king : 
This  wicked  design  was,  by  a  happy  providence  defeated,  just  when  it  was  upon  the 
very  point  of  being  executed.  In  his  majesty's  happy  preservation  Sir  David 
Murray,  the  Comptroller,  was  highly  instrumental.  At  the  same  time  he  did  the 
court  a  piece  of  exceeding  acceptable  service ;  for  when  the  town  of  Perth  were 
all  in  an  uproar  and  tumult  upon  the  kiUing  of  the  Earl  of  Gowrie,  who  was 
their  Provost,  he  had  the  chief  hand  with  his  friends  in  composing  the  citizens, 
in  quelling  the  tumult,  and  carrying  ^the  king  and  the  court  safe  back  to  Falk- 
land (f). 

(a)  Charta  penes  Viceconiitem  de  Stormont,  ac  etiam  in  publicis  arcliivis.  (b)  Ibidem,  (c)  Ibidem, 
ad  annum  1604.     (</)  Ibidem.     (<■)  History  of  Cowrie's  Conspiracy. 


APPENDIX.  205 

This  accident,  in  which  Sir  David  Murray  had  so  great  a  share  of  merit,  laid 
a  deep  root  with  his  majesty,  and  begot  such  a  confidence  that  was  never  after- 
wards shaken.  He  upon  this  came  to  be  considered  as  one  of  the  first  favourites, 
and  in  whom  the  king  could  well  repose  the  firmest  confidence.  His  majesty  came 
now  to  heap  favours  on  him  ;  he  began  with  giving  him  the  barony  of  Ruthvcu, 
the  chief  seat  of  the  Earl  of  Gowrie,  which  he  called  Huntingtower,  and  had 
come  to  the  crown  by  the  Earl's  forfeiture.  Soon  after  that  he  gave  him  the 
lands  of  the  whole  abbacy  of  Scone,  of  which  the  Earl  of  Gowrie  had  been 
commendator  («),  erected,  united,  and  incorporated  into  a  temporal  lordihip,  to 
be  called  the  lordship  of  Scone,  with  place,  seat,  and  voice  in  Parliament ;  and 
was  thereupon,  with  the  greatest  solemnity,  invested  m  the  honour  the  7th  of 
April  1605  (6),  by  a  special  commission  directed  to  the  Earl  of  Dunfermline,  the 
Lord  Chancellor,  for  that  effect.  The  ceremony  was  in  presence  of  the  Earls  of 
Angus,  Sutherland,  Marischal,  Linlithgow,  the  Lords  Fleming,  Drummond,  and 
Thirlestane  :  the  erection  of  the  lordship  of  Scone  was  confirmed  to  the  Lord 
Scone  by  a  special  act  of  Parliament  in  the  1606  (<).  Quickly  after  this  his  ma- 
jesty was  graciously  pleased  to  bestow  upon  his  favourite,  the  Lord  Scone,  the 
oftice  of  Ranger,  or  the  Rangery  of  the  Lomonds,  the  Forestry  of  the  Woods, 
and  the  old  Castle-steed  of  Falkland  (rf),  and  several  other  beneficial  grants  from 
the  crown. 

The  king,  his  master,  well  knowing  his  fiivourite  servant,  the  Lord  Scone,  to  be 
a  man  of  more  than  ordinary  courage  and  resolution,  made  choice  of  him  to  re- 
present his  royal  person  as  High  Commissioner  in  several  of  tlie  general  assem- 
bles of  this  church,  where  he  deported  himself  so  boldly  and  resolutely  in  the 
king's  service,  that  he  had  a  pecuhar  hand  in  carrying  through  things  that  met 
with  a  very  high  opposition  in  reference  to  the  settling  a  liturgy,  and  in  bring- 
ing the  church  of  Scotland  to  some  nearer  degrees  of  uniformity  with  the  church 
of  England,  which  the  king  had  set  his  heart  so  much  upon,  and  could  not  have 
been  well  brought  about  by  a  man  of  less  resolution  and  spirit  than  that  Lord  (f). 
As  he  acted  his  part  to  the  king's  great  contentment  and  satisfaction  in  the  Eccle- 
siastical Court,  and  with  so  much  success,  so  his  lordship  showed  no  less  zeal  in 
promoting  the  king's  service  in  the  Parliament  1621,  when  the  decrees  of  the 
church  came  to  receive  the  sanction  of  law :  How  soon  the  five  articles  of  the 
Perth  assembly  passed  into  laws,  the  Lord  Scone  was  dispatched  to  court  to  in- 
form his  Majesty  of  the  success  of  his  instructions,  by  the  Marquiss  of  Hamilton, 
his  majesty's  High  Commissioner :  to  commemorate  his  long  and  faithful  services 
his  majesty  was  graciously  pleased  to  raise  him  to  the  honour  of  Viscount  of  Stor- 
mont,  by  letters  patent,  bearing  date  the  i6th  of  August  in  the  year  1621,  afore- 
said (/■).  The  dignity  is  limited  to  the  heirs-male,  which  would  have  carried  the 
peerage  to  his  nephew  Sir  Andrew  Murray  of  Balvaird,  as  he  had  all  along  in- 
tended, for  he  never  had  any  children  of  his  own  :  but  there  is  no  absolute^appi- 
.ness  in  this  sublunary  world  ;  for,  in  the  1624,  he  received  a  great  domestic  afflic- 
tion in  his  own  family,  by  the  death  of  his  nephew  Sir  Andrew  Murray  of  Bal- 
vaird, to  whom  the  viscount  himself  succeeded.  This  accident  altered  all  his 
schemes  of  the  succession  of  his  honour  and  estate,  and  made  him  take  new  mea- 
sures ;  for  as  he,  by  the  king's  favour,  got  his  honours  after  his  death  conveyed  to 
Sir  Mungo  Murray,  son  to  the  Earl  of  Tullibardin,  who  had  married  his  niece, 
and  to  the  heirs-male  t^  his  body,  and  failing  these,  to  John  Earl  of  Annandale 
and  his  heirs-male,  and  in  failure  of  these,  to  his  own  heirs-male,  and  his  estate  of 
conquest  ;  so,  moved  from  principles  of  honour  and  conscience,  to  preserve  his  fa- 
mily of  Balvaird  in  the  line  of  the  heirs-male,  he  adopted  for  his  nephew  his 
cousin-german's  son,  Mr  Andrew  Murray,  then  minister  at  Ebdie,  son  to  David 
Murray  of  Balgonie  and  Kippo,  and  immediately  settled  on  him  the  fee  of  the 
estate  of  Balvaird,  &e. 

(a)  Charta  penes  Vicecomitem  de  Stormont,  etiam  charta  in  archivis,  ad  annum  1 580.  (i)  Mr  Work 
man's  Manuscript,  who  was  a  famous  herald,  and  assisted  at  the  solemnity  of  the  investiture  himself, 
(c)  Charta  penes  Viceromitem  de  Stormont.  {d)  Ibidem,  (f)  Spotusivood  and  Calderwood's  Histories 
of  the  Church.     (/)  Charta  in  publicis  rotulis,  ad  annum  1621. 

Vol.  U.  6  N 


^00  APPENDIX. 

His  other  estate  of  conquest  he  provided,  together  with  his  title  of  honour,  as 
we  observed,  to  Sir  Mungo  Murray,  and  after  him  to  the  Earl  of  Annandale,  and 
after  their  respective  heirs-male,  to  Mr  Andrew  Murray  of  Balvaird  his  own  heir- 
male  ;  the  crown  countenanced  all  these  settlements  of  the  Viscount  of  Stor- 
mont,  and  thereupon  Sir  Mungo  Murray,  his  heir  of  entail,  came  to  be  designed 
Master  of  Stormont,  as  much  as  if  he  had  been  the  Viscount's  own  son,  even  in 
his  lifetime. 

David,  the  first  Viscount  of  Stormont,  was  married  to  Dame  Elizabeth  Bethune, 
JaLighter  of  Sir  David  Bethune  of  Creigh,  in  the  county  of  Fife;  but,  dying  on  the 
77th  of  June  1631,  he  was  with  great  funeral  solemnity  interred  in  a  vault  within 
the  church  of  Scone,  on  the  23d  of  September  thereafter,  under  a  noble  and  mag- 
nificent monument  of  various-coloured  marble,  erected  by  himself  many  years 
before  his  death,  with  his  statue  as  big  as  the  hfe,  in  a  postue  of  devotion,  with  this 
inscription  upon  a  tablet  of  black  marble,  wherein  most  of  his  remarkable- actions 
are  set  forth. 

"  The  Right  Honourable  Sir  David  Murray  of  Gospertie,  Knight,  son  to  Sir 

"  Andrew  Murray  of  Balvaird  ;  his  grandsire  brother  to  the  Earl  of  Tillibardine  ; 

"  his  mother  daughter  to  the   Earl  of  Montrose  ;    his  gooddame  of  the   father, 

"  daughter  to  the  Lord  Lindsay;  his  gooddame   of  the   mother,  daughter  to  the 

'*  Earl  Marischal ;  who  for  his  good  services  done  to  King  James  VL  whom  he 

"  faithfully  served  from  his  youth  in  many  honourable  employments,  from  a  Cup- 

*'  bearer.  Master  of  his  Horses,  Master  of  his  House,  Comptroller  of  his  rents.  Cap- 

"  tain  of  his  Majesty's  Guards,  one  of  his  Honourable  Privy  Council,  was  created 

"  Lord  Scone.     He  married  Dame  Elizabeth  Beaton,  an  ancient  baron's  daughter 

"  of  Crich,  died  without  issue,  left  his  estate  to  his  nephew  of  Balvaird,  and  to 

"  Dame  Agnes  Murray  his  niece,  whom  he  married  to  a  brother  of  the  Earl  of 

*•  TiUibardine's,from  whom  he  first  descended;  he  helped  his  other  friends,  who  enjoy 

"  the  fruits  of  his  labour ;  his  buildings  pruifs  he  was  politique  ;  good  men  knew 

"  he  loved  virtue,  and  malefactors  that  he  maintained  justice;  he  founded  this  hos- 

"  pita],  and  builded  this  church  ;  his  soul  enjoys  happiness  :  and  under  this  tomb, 

"  builded  by  himself,  lyeth  his  body,  expecting  the  joyful  resurrection." 

To  David,  the  first  Viscount  of  Stormont,  succeeded,  as  heir  of  provision  and 
entail,  Mungo  Viscount  of  Stormont  aforesaid,  in  the  honour  and  in  the  lordship 
of  Scone,  and  barony  of  Stormont.  He  married  Dame  Anne  Murray,  only  daugh- 
ter of  Sir  Andrew  Murray  of  Balvaird,  brother  to  the  first  viscount,  and,  after  her 
death,  Anne,  daughter  of  John  Earl  of  Wemyss,  widow  of  Alexander  Lindsay  of 
Edziell ;  but  by  neither  of  these  two  ladies,  his  wives,  had  he  any  issue  ;  and,  de- 
parting this  life  in  September  1642,  the  lordship  of  Scone,  and  the  honour  of 
Visccnmt  of  Stormont  came  to  James,  then  Earl  of  Annandale,  in  virtue  of  the 
Viscount's  destination  ;  and  so  being  the  lesser  dignity,  it  was  immerged  and  ab- 
sorbed in  the  higher  honour  of  the  Earl  of  Annandale,  and  there  it  remained  for 
about  the  space  of  sixteen  years,  that  the  Earl  of  Annandale  dying  without  issue 
m  the  1658,  the  honour  of  Viscount  of  Stormont  was  again  revived,  and  devolved 
to  David  then  Lord  Balvaird,  heir-male  and  of  entail  to  David  the  first  Lord  Scone, 
and  Viscount  of  Stormont. 

The  ancestor  of  the  Lord  Balvaird  was  William  Muriay  of  Letterbanachy, 
second  son  to  Sir  David  Murray  of  Arngosk,  and  Dame  _fanet  Lindsay  his  wife, 
daughter  of  John  Lord  Lindsay,  and  uncle  to  David  the  first  Viscount  of  Stor- 
mont. This  is  vouched  and  clearly  instructed  from  a  charter  granted  by  his 
brother  Sir  Andrew  Murray  of  Arngosk,  Willielmo  Murray  fratri  stio  gerrnano,  de 
terris  de  Letterbanacbie,  in  vicecomitatu  de  Perth,  et  baredibus  suis,  in  the  1553  («). 

This  William  Murray  of  Letterbanachy,  who  was  the  second  brother  of  the 
family  of  Arngosk,  allied  in  marriage  with  the  House  of  Oliphant  (6),  andjhad 
Andrew  Murray  of  Letterbanachy,  his  eldest  son,  who  died  without  issue,  and 

David,  the  second  son,  who  was  heir  to  his  father,  and  at  different  times  is  de- 
signed Duvid  Murray  de  Linthill,  de  Balgony  and  Kippo.     There  is  a   charter  I 

(a)  Chaita  jenes  Jacobum  Murray  de  Abercaimy.      (4)  Herald  books. 
2 


APPENDIX.  207 

Lave  seen,  wherein  he  calls  himself  David  Murray  de  BaIj{ony,  filius  et  hares  quon-  . 
dam  IVdIielmi  Murray  de  Letterbanacbie  (a).  He  is  by  this  designation  substitute 
in  an  investiture  of  the  estate  of  Balvaird,  in  favour  of  Sir  Andrew  Murray  of 
Balvaird,  in  the  1604,  to  whom  he  was  a  cousin-german,  and  is  placed  before 
David  Murray,  portioner  of  Airdeth,  whom  Sir  Andrew  calls  liis  unci?,  his  father's 
brother,  and  who  was  an  immediate  younger  brother  to  Wdliam  Murray  of  Let- 
terbanachy.  This  David  Murray  of  Balgonie  came  after  that  to  acquire  from  the 
family  of  Halvaird  the  estate  of  Kippo  in  Fife,  which  he  afterw'ards  sold  to  Dr 
.  David  Philp,  rt««o  1623  (Zi).  This  gentleman  married  Agnes  Moncrief,  daughter 
to  the  Laird  of  Moncrief  (<),  by  whom  he  had  issue, 

Gilbert  Murray,  his  eldest  son,  who  died  without  issue, 

Mr  Andrew  Murrav,  the  second  son,  afterwards  Lord  Balvaird, 

William,  the  third  son, 

David,  the  fourth  son,  and 

KATHARINE,  a  daughter,  who  was  married  to  John  Arnot  of  Pitouie,  and  had 
issue. 

Mr  Andrew  Murray,  afterwards  Lord  Balvaird,  being  at  first  a  younger  brother, 
was  bred  to  the  church,  and,  taking  holy  orders,  he  was  soon  after  instituted  mi- 
nister of  the  parish  of  Ebdie  in  the  shire  of  Fife,  as  soon  as  the  1618  (d).  Upon 
the  death  of  Sir  Andrew  Murray  of  Balvaird,  the  presumptive  heir  of  the  Viscount 
of  Stormont,  his  lordship  having  no  issue  of  his  own,  nor  hopes  of  any,  he  from 
henceforth  considered  Mr  Murray  as  his  heir-male,  as  indeed  he  was.  The  Viscount, 
now  moved  from  principles  of  honour  and  conscience  to  preserve  his  paternal 
estate  entire  in  the  blood  and  line  of  the  family,  however  he  should  dispose  of  his 
other  conquest,  did  now,  in  the  1625,  upon  the  back  of  his  nephew's  death,  take  a 
new  investiture  of  the  estate  of  Balvaird  and  Arngosk  to  himself  in  liferent,  and 
the  fee  to  the  heirs-male  of  his  body ;  which  failing,  to  Mr  Andrew  Murray,  mi- 
nister at  Ebdie;  this  deed  is  dated  the  26th  of  November  1625  (e).  Accordingly, 
as  heir  of  the  investiture,  he  succeeded  the  Viscount  of  Stormont,  his  cousin,  in 
that  part  of  his  estate,  on  his  death  in  the  163 1.  Immediately  on  the  back  of 
that  he  gets  a  charter  of  his  whole  estate,  which  was  now  very  considerable,  and 
which  he  provides  to  the  heirs-male  of  his  body;  which  failing,  to  Mungo,  then 
Viscount  of  Stormont,  and  to  the  heirs-male  of  his  body;  which  faihng,  to  the 
heirs-male  of  the  bodies  of  Gilbert,  WilHam,  and  David  Mm-rays,  his  brothers,  }e- 
spective.  This  charter  is  of  the  date  the  14th  of  July  1632  (/).  At  the  solem- 
nity of  the  coronation  of  King  Charles  I.  on  the  i8th  of  June  1633,  Mr  Murray  of 
Balvaird,  the  minister  at  Ebdie,  was  one  of  tliose  gentlemen  the  king  conferred 
the  honour  of  knighthood  on,  though  he  was  an  actual  minister  at  the  time :  Mr 
Murray  was  esteemed,  and  had  the  character  of  a  wise,  grave,  prudent,  pious  man, 
and  well  disposed  to  the  whole  frame  of  the  government,  and  the  constitution  as 
estabhshed  by  law:  Possessed  with  all  these  qualities,  he  was  pitched  on  as  a  very 
proper  member  for  the  Assembly  of  Glasgow,  in  the  1638,  where,  by  his  temper, 
authority,  and  moderation,  he  studied  all  that  was  possible  to  allay  the  heats,  and 
compose  the  differences  that  were  there  agitated  with  so  much  warmth  and  zeal  in 
reference  to  episcopacy,  and  the  government  of  the  church  by  bishops:  His  con- 
duct and  behaviour  was  much  taken  notice  of  by  his  Majesty's  Commissioner  the 
Marquis  of  Hamilton,  insomuch  that  the  marquis  was  pleased  to  give  the  king  a  very- 
good  charadler  of  Sir  Andrew  Murray,  as  a  clergymen  well  disposed  to  peace,  for 
healing  breaches,  and  much  averse  from  carrying  matters  to  extremities  on  either 
side.  Though  he  still  leaned  to  the  king's  side,  he  continued  to  sit  in  the  Assem- 
bly till  the  Commissioner  thought  fit  to  leave  them,  and  he  then  retired  with 
others  of  the  brethren  who  were  not  inclined  or  disposed  to  make  those  alterations 
in  the  cortstitution  of  the  church  that  were  carried  through,  and  driven  on  by  the 
remaining  part  of  the  Assembly.  However,  he  took  the  covenant,  when  it  was 
enjoined  by  authority,  as  the  only  mean  that  was  left  for  preserving  the  peace  and 
tranquillity  of  the  kingdom,  which  was  then  strangely  divided. 

(a)  Penes  Abercairny,  ad  annum  161 2.  (i)  Herald  books,  MSS.  (c)  Charta  penes  Vicecomitem 
de  Stormont.     {d)  Ibidem,     (f)  Ibidem.     {/)  Ibidem. 


io8  APPENDIX. 

In  the  1641,  when  the  king  came  down  to  hold  the  Parliament  in  his  owii 
royal  person,  to  cement  all  differences,  to  redress  all  grievances,  and  to  give  a  ge- 
neral satibfiiction,  at  the  end  of  the  Session  he  was  pleased  to  create  several  peer--, 
and,  among  the  rest,  Sir  Andrew  Murray  of  Balvaird  was  created  Lord  Balvaird. 
by  letters  patent,  the  14th  of  November  1641  (a).  Soon  after  this  he  got  a  very 
considerable  accession  to  his  estate,  the  barony  of  Stormont,  by  the  death  of  his 
cousin  Mungo  Viscount  of  Stormont,  to  whom  he  is  served  and  retoured  heir  of 
tailzie  and  provision  in  that  barony  in  May  1643  C^^-  With  all  this  accession  of 
wealth  and  honour,  he,  notwithstanding,  continued  still  to  exercise  his  pastoral 
function  in  the  ministry  at  his  parish  of  Ebdie  till  his  dying  day.  The  troubles 
that  ensued,  and  the  fatal  breach  betwixt  the  King  and  the  Parliament,  had  a  con- 
siderable influence  on  his  health,  and  quickly  hastened  him  to  his  grave.  His 
testament  I  have  seen,  dated  the  24th  of  September  1644(6),  and  his  death  hap- 
pened in  three  or  four  days  thereafter.  He  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  David, 
the  first  Earl  of  Southesk,  by  whom  he  had  issue, 

David  Lord  Balvaird,  his  eldest  son  and  successor,  thereafter  Viscount  of 
Stormont. 

Sir  Andrew  Murray  of  Pitlochie,  of  whom  is  Murray  of  Murrayshall  in  Perth- 
shire. 

James  Murray,  Esq.  the  third  son,  was  a  Doctor  of  Medicine,  a  man  of  learning 
and  reputation  in  his  profession.  He  left  a  daughter,  his  heir,  who  was  married  to 
Dr  Robert  Carmichael  of  Bamblae,  mother  by  him  to  Dr  James  Carmichael  of 
Bamblae. 

Sir  John  Murray  of  Drumcairn,  the  fourth  son,  who  was  educated  to  the  pro- 
fession of  the  law;  and  after  he  had  long  practised  at  the  bar,  with  reputation, 
learning,  and  integrity,  he  was  promoted  to  be  one  of  the  Senators  of  the  College 
of  Justice,  where  he  continued  till  the  Revolution.  He  left  a  daughter,  Elizabeth, 
who  was  the  first  wife  of  Francis  the  present  Earl  of  Murray. 

Mr  William  Murray,  the  fifth  son,  was  a  famous  and  celebrated  lawyer  before 
the  Court  of  Session,  and  was  esteemed  one  of  the  first  men  of  that  profession  in 
his  time.     The  Lord  Balvaird  had  also  three  daughters, 

Katharine,  the  eldest,  was  never  married. 

Barbara,  the  second,  was  married  to  Andrew  Lord  Gray  of  Foulis,  and  had 
issue. 

Marjory,  the  third,  was  married  to  Sir  Alexander  Gibson  of  Durie,  by  whom  he 
had  only  one  daughter,  his  heir,  who  was  married  to  John  Murray  of  Polmaise, 
in  the  county  of  Stirling,  a  very  ancient  family  of  the  ^lurrays,  and  had  issue. 

David,  the  second  Lord  Balvaird,  succeeded  his  father  in  his  estate  and  ho- 
nour: He  was  a  high  royalist,  and  adhered  to  the  interest  of  the  royal  family 
when  it  was  at  the  lowest  ebb  of  fortune,  with  inflexible  fidelity.  This  exposed 
him  to  the  resentment  of  Cromwell,  who,  when  he  imposed  fines  on  all  men  of  rank 
and  condition  that  favoured  the  king's  interest,  in  the  1654,  the  Lord  Balvaird 
was  fined  in  L.1500  Sterling  (d). 

On  the  death  of  James  Murray  Earl  of  Annandale,  as  has  been  hitherto  ob- 
served, he  succeeded  to  the  honour  and  dignity  of  Viscount  of  Stormont,  and  to 
the  lordship  of  Scone,  who  had  that  honour  and  estate  in  his  person.  He  married 
Jean,  daughter  of  James  the  second  Earl  of  Southesk,  and  widow  and  relict  of 
James  Earl  of  Annandale  aforesaid,  by  whom  he  had  David,  his  son  and  heir,  and 
a  daughter,  Katharine,  who  was  married  to  William  Earl  of  Kintore,  and  had  issue. 
He  died  the  7th  of  July  1667,  and  was  succeeded  by 

David  Viscount  of  Stormont,  his  son,  who  married  Marjory,  only  daughter  of 
David  Scott  of  Scotstarvet  (f),  heir-male  of  the  most  noble  family  of  Buccleu"-h 
by  Nicolas  his  first  wife,  only  daughter  of  Sir  John  Grierson  of  Lagg,  and  of  his  wife 
Isabel,  one  of  the  daughters  and  heirs  of  Robert  Lord  Boyd ;  and  that  way  the 
present  Viscount  of  Stormont  is  come  of  one  of  the  heirs  of  line  of  Sir  James 

(a)  The  book  in  the  registers  where  these  patents  have  been  insert  is  torn  out,  but  the  minute-book 
has  it  marked   14th  November.         (i)  In  archivis.  (<r)   Charta  penes  Vieecomitem  de  Stormont. 

iV }  Cromivell's  Act  of  Indemnity.      (c)   Charta  penes  David  Scot  de  Scotstarvet. 


APPENDIX.  aoy 

Murray  of  Cockpool,  who  was  elder  brother  to  John  Murray  of  Dundrenan,  there- 
after Viscount  of  Annan,  and  Jiarl  of  Annandale;  for  Sir  John  Griersoa  of  Lagg's 
mother  was  eldest  daughter  of  Sn-  James  Murray  of  Cockpool.  Theother  chil- 
dren of  the  late  Viscount  of  Stormont,  besides  David,  now  Viscount  of  Stormont, 
are  James  Murray,  Esq.  who  was  bred  a  lawyer,  and  for  some  time  practised  be- 
fore the  Court  of  Session ;  John,  who  died  young ;  Mr  William  Murray  of  Lin- 
coln's-Inn,  that  great  honour  and  ornament  of  his  country  and  family ;  Charles 
Murray,  Esq.  and  Robert,  who  died  young  ;  hkewise  six  daughters; 

Katharine. 

Elizabeth,  who  died  unmarried. 

Marjory,  married  to  Colonel  John  Hay  of  Cromlicks,  second  son  to  Thomas 
Earl  of  Kinnoul. 

Emilia,  married  to  Sir  Alexander  Lindsay  of  Evelick,  baronet,  in  the  county  of 
Perth,  hath  issue 

Margaret, 

Helen-Nicolas, 
Mary,  who  died  unmarried. 

He  died  on  the  9th  day  of  November  1731,  and  was  succeeded  by 
D.wiD,  now  Viscount  of  Stormont,  his  son,  who  married  Anne,  only  daughter  of 
John  Stewart  of  Innernytie,  by  whom  he  has  issue, 
David,  Master  of  Stormont, 
James, 
Anne,  and 
Marjory. 


RUTHERFORD  Lord  RUTHERFORD,  and  E.arl  of  TEVIOT. 


THIS  was  an  ancient  powerful  family  on  the  border,  in  the  county  of  Teviot- 
dalc ;  the  origin  of  the  name  and  family,  so  far  as  the  tradition  may  by  credited, 
is  said  to  be  descended  from  a  person  who  was  guide  to  Ruther,  King  of  Scots, 
through  the  river  Tweed,  in  an  expedition  against  the  Britons,  at  a  place  from 
that  called  Ruther-fo'd,  which  was  bestowed  on  hnn,  and  from  whence  his  descen- 
dants took  a  surname,  how  soon  surnames  became  hereditary.  However  this  be, 
so  much  is  certain,  that  the  family  of  Rutherford  was  always  looked  on  as  one  of 
the  most  ancient  and  powerful  families  that  resided  on  the  borders,  and  were  a 
race  of  very  gallant  brave  men,  frequently  concerned  in  their  inroads,  and  other 
warlike  entevprizes,  made  into  England  by  the  Earls  and  Lords  of  Douglas.  The 
first  of  the  family  of  Rutherford,  for  which  1  have  seen  any  voucher  is  Nicolaus  dc 
Rutherford,  that  is  Rutherford  of  that  ilk,  who  is  one  of  the  great  barons  in  the 
county  of  Roxburgh  who  swore  fealty  and  allegiance  to  King  Edward  I.  in  the 
bond  of  submission  we  call  the  Ragman-Roll  (.i)  ;  as  Alimtr  de  Rutherfurd  makes 
another  submissi  m  to  King  Edward  from  the  same  authority  we  have  just  now 
cited  (6).  The  learned  and  exact  hi urian,  Dr  John  Barbour,  Archdean  of  Aber- 
deen, takes  notice,  in  the  History  of  King  Robert  the  Bruce,  of  many  gallant 
brave  men,  who  eminently  exerted  themselves  in  defence  of  the  sovereignty  and 
independeiicy  of  their  country,  and  in  maintaining  the  right  and  title  of  their 
glorious  sovereign  to  the  crown  of  this  reahn ;  and,  among  others,  he  mentions 
Sir  Robert  Rutherford.  The  first  of  this  ancient  noble  family  that  I  have  de- 
signed of  Rutherford,  or  of  that  Ilk,  was  Ricardusde  Rutherfurddominusejusdem,miles, 
who  is  a  witness  to  a  charter  granted  by  William  TurnbuU  to  William  Stewart  his  ne- 

(a)   Prj-P.ne's  Hist,  page  68S.     (*)   Ibidem,  page  688. 

VoL.IL  6  0 


oio  APPENDIX. 

phew,  of  the  lands  of  IVfinto,  in  1390,  which  is  ratified  and  confirmed  by  a  charter 
under  the  Great  Seal  in  the  public  archives.  This  Sir  Richard  Rutherford  of 
that  Ilk,  by  his  lady,  who  was  a  Douglas,  had  two  sons;  James,  the  eldest,  his 
heir  and  successor;  and  John,  who  had  a  grant  horn  Archibald  Earl  of  Douglas, 
f)f  the  lands  of  Chatto,  anno  1424,  and  was  the  ancestor  of  the  Rutherfords  of 
?Iunthill,  who  came  afterwards  to  enjoy  the  honour  of  Lord  Rutherford.  James 
Rutherford  of  that  Ilk  is  one  of  the  great  men  on  the  border  who  were  conserva- 
tors of  the  peace  with  England  in  the  1457  (^/),  July  the  13th.  There  are  mark- 
ed and  ranked  in  the  vouchers  after  the  nobility,  yirchibaldiis  Rutberfurd  vicecomes 
dt'  Roxburgh,  Alexander  Hume,  Walterus  Scot,  Robertus  Cricbton  vicecomes  de  Niths- 
dale,  William  Cranston^  Symon  Glendining,  David  Hume,  jnilites,  Thomas  Cranston  de 
eodem,  'Jacobus  Rutberfurd  de  eodem,  Joannes  Johnston  de  eodem,  Andreas  Ker  de 
Cessford,  Georgius  Ormiston  de  eodem,  Carolus  Murray  de  Cockpole,  IVillielmus  Carlyle 
de  Tortborald.  This  James  Rutherford  of  that  Ilk  was  succeeded  by  another  James 
Rutherford  of  that  Ilk,  whom  I  have  found  designed  Jacobus  Rutberfurd  filius  et 
bisres  quondam  Jacobi  Rutberfurd  de  eodem,  in  a  gift  of  the  patronage  of  the  kirk  of 
Rutherford  that  had  formerly  pertained  to  the  Earls  of  Douglas  (b).  In  the  year 
1483  he  had  a  charter,  under  the  Great  Seal,  of  his  estate,  and  to  Margaret  Ers- 
kine,  his  spouse,  who  was  daughter  to  the  Lord  Erskine,  by  whom  he  had  issue, 
Philip,  his  eldest  son  and  heir  apparent,  who,  in  the  lifetime  of  his  father,  married 
Elizabeth  Ker,  daughter  to  Sir  Walter  Ker  of  Cessford,  ancestor  to  the  present 
Duke  of  Roxburgh,  by  whom  he  had  a  son,  Richard,  his  grandfather's  heir,  and 
jwo  daughters;  Helen,  who  afterwards  became  her  brother's  heir,  and  married  Sir 
John  Forman  of  Devon,  brother  to  Andrew,  Archbishop  of  St  Andrews,  Commen- 
iiator  of  Pittenweem  and  Cudtingham  in  England  (r),  but  had  no  issue;  and  Ka- 
tharine, the  other  daughter,  who  was  married  to  Sir  James  Stewart  of  Traquair, 
son  to  James  Earl  of  Buchan,  and  thereby  got  the  estate  of  Rutherford  and  Well, 
and  is  the  ancestor  of  the  Earl  of  Traquair,  who  carries  the  coat  of  Rutherford  in 
his  achievement.  Of  the  Rutherfords  of  Chatto  and  Hunthill  the  Rutherfords  of 
Chiarryhole  were  a  branch;  William  Rutherford  of  Quarry  hole  married  Isabel, 
daughter  to  the  above  Sir  James  Stewart  of  Traquair,  by  whom  he  had  issue  a  son, 
Lieutenant-General  Andrew  Rutherford,  first  dignified  with  jhe  honour  of  Lord 
Rutherford,  and  after  that  raised  to  the  title  of  Earl  of  Teviot,  and  a  daughter. 
Christian,  who  was  married  to  Robert  Durie  of  Grange,  in  the  county  of  Fife, 
whose  descendants  are  heirs  of  line  and  provision  to  the  Earl  of  Teviot,  Lord 
Rutherford,  and  now  carry  the  title  of  Lord  Rutherford.  This  illustrious  person, 
Lieutenant-General  Rutherford,  having  acquired  great  honour,  glory,  and  fame,  by 
his  military  achievements  in  foreign  parts,  was,  upon  the  restoration  of  King 
Charles  II.  raised  to  the  honour  of  Lord  Rutherford.  In  the  preamble  of  the  pa- 
tent, the  king's  majesty  is  graciously  pleased  to  give  such  a  noble  shining  charac- 
ter of  Lieutenant-General  Rutherford,  the  patentee,  and  does  express  and  set  forth 
his  merit  and  services  in  such  terms,  and  so  much  to  his  honour,  that  it  would  be 
unjust  not  to  give  at  least  hints  of  it  here.  His  majesty  declares  the  motive  in- 
ducing him  to  raise  the  said  lieutenant-general  to  the  dignity  of  Lord  Rutherford, 
was,  "  For  his  distinguished  merit  and  extraordinary  qualities  in  the  service  of 
■'  the  crown  of  P>ance,  in  the  quality  of  lieutenant-general ;  as  also  the  honour  he 
"  hath  not  only  done  to  his  private  family,  but  his  country  in  general,  by  his 
"  glorious  actions  performed  among  foreign  nations,  both  in  peace  and  war,  with 
"  equal  valour  and  success,  upon  the  public  theatre  of  France,  Italy,  Germany, 
•'  and  the  Netherlands,  and  likewise  the  loyalty  and  constancy  with  which  he 
"  hath  always  adhered  to  us,  and  with  what  zeal  and  readiness  he  ever  stood  affect- 
"  ed  toward  the  serving  of  our  cause  ;  and  therefore  raises  him  to  the  honour  and 
"  dignity  of  Lord  Rutberfurd,  and  to  his  heirs  and  assignees  whatsomever,  and 
"  that  under  wlwt  provisions,  restrictions,  and  conditions,  the  said  Lord  Ruther- 
"  furd  shall  think  fit."  The  patent  is  dated  at  Whitehall  the  loth  January  1661. 
General  Rutherford  was  made  Governor  of  Dunkirk,  which  he  enjoyed  till  it  was 
sold  to  France;  upon  that  he  v^'as  raised  to  the  honour  of  Earl  of  Teviot,  by  let- 

(c)  First  Vol.  Nisbet's  Hist,     {h)  Chaita  in  rcgistro.     (c)  Charta  in  registro. 


appendix:.  2ir 

rers  patent,  bearing  date  the  2d  of  February  1662  Qi),  and  the  honour  is  limited  to 
the  heirs-male  of  his  own  body.  Soon  after  that  he  was  made  Governor  of  Tan- 
gier, where  he  died  on  the  4th  of  May  1664.  The  Earl,  leaving  no  issue  of  his 
own  before  he  went  over  to  Tangier,  made  his  latter  will  and  testament,  dated  at 
Portsmouth  the  29th  of  December  1663(1^),  wherein  he  conveyed  his  estate  and  dig- 
nity of  Lord  Rutherford  to  Sir  Thomas  Rutherford  of  Hunthill,  a  very  remote  re- 
lation, merely  on  account  of  the  name,  who  accordingly  enjoyed  the  honours  of 
Lord  Rutherford,  as  did  also  liis  two  brothers.  Lord  Archibald  and  Robert,  in 
course  of  succession;  and  all  of  them  having  not  only  died  without  lawful  issue,  (upon 
which  the  heirs-male  of  the  famdy  of  Hunthill  became  entirely  extinct)  but  also 
having  incurred  the  irritancies  contained  in  the  Earl's  disposition  of  the  honours  in 
their  favour,  the  said  honour,  title,  and  dignity,  of  Lord  Rutherfurd,  in  conse- 
sequence  of  the  above-incurred  irritancies,  legally  devolved  on  John  Durie  of 
Grange,  the  Earl's  grand-nephew,  and  heir  of  line  and  provision,  served  and  retour- 
ed  167 1,  and  are  accordingly  possessed  by  his  son,  George,  the  present  Lord 
Rutherford,  served  and  retoured  heir  of  line,  tailzie,  and  provision,  to  that  noble 
Earl  in  his  title  and  dignity  of  Lord  Rutherford,  in  1733. 

George  Lord  Rutherford  married  Mrs  Margaret  Ogilvie,  only  child  of  Captain 
David  Ogilvie  of  the  Scots  Guards,  by  whom  he  has  issue, 

David,  Master  of  Rutherford,  and  a  daughter.  Agatha. 


Of  the  ancient  and  honourable  family  of  CAMPBELL  of  Glenorchy, 

NOW  DIGNIFIED  WITH  THE  TITLE  OF  EaRL  OF  BREAD ALBANE. 


THIS  noble  family  derives  it  original  from  Sir  Colin  Campbell  of  Glenorchy, 
second  son  of  Sir  Duncan  Campbell  of  Lochow,  ("ancestor  to  the  Duke  of  Argyle) 
by  the  Lady  Marjory  Stewart  his  wife,  daughter  of  Robert  Duke  of  Albany,  Earl 
of  Fife  and  Monteith  (c),  second  lawful  son  of  Robert  II.  King  of  Scotland,  and 
Governor  of  the  Kingdom  during  the  reign  of  King  Robert  III.  his  brother,  and 
the  minority  of  King  James  I.  his  nephew.  Sir  Colin  was  provided  by  his  father 
to  the  barony  of  Glenorchy  ;  which  estate  he  enlarged  by  several  considerable 
acquisitions  of  his  own,  confirmed  to  him  by  grants  from  the  king.  Upon 
his  father's  death  he  became  tutor-in-Iaw  and  guardian  to  his  nephews,  the  sons 
of  his  eldest  brother;  which  office  he  executed  with  great  fidelity.  To  Colin,  the 
eldest,  afterwards  created  Earl  of  Argyle,  he  procured  in  marriage  Dame  Isabel  Stew- 
art, his  lady's  second  sister,and  one  of  the  daughters  and  co-heirsof  John  Lord  Lorn  ; 
and  Dame  Mariota  Stewart,  the  third  of  these  co-heirs,  to  Archibald  Campbell,  ano- 
ther nephev/of  his,  from  whom  the  old  branchof  the  Campbells  of  Otter  are  descend- 
ed ((f).  After  the  execrable  and  unnatural  murder  of  that  excellent  prince  King 
James  I.  Sir  Colin  Campbell  of  Glenorchy,  who  had  the  honour  to  stand  nearly  related 
to  him  in  blood,  was  very  active  and  diligent  in  searching  for  and  pursuing  ths  regi- 
cides, and  was  so  successful  in  this  undertaking,  that  he  very  soon  apprehended  and 
brought  to  justice  two  of  the  most  notorious  of  the  assassins,  Christopher  Col- 
quhoun  and  Robert  Chalmer,  who  had  been  drawn  into  that  hellish  conspiracy 

(/?)  In  the  registers  of  Parliament.  (i)  Extract  of  the  latter  will  and  test.raient  of  the  Earloi^ 
Teviot,  Lord  Rutherford,  out  of  the  register  of  the  prerogative  court  of  Canterbury,  dated  29th  of  De- 
cember i66j.  (c)  For  instructing  this  descent  there  is  a  charter  granted  by  Robert  Duke  of  Albany, 
liilecto  filio  suo  Duncano  Campbell  de  Lochow,  militi,  of  the  lands  of  Minstry,  on  his  own  resigna- 
tion, penes  ducem  de  Argyle,  in  the  foundation-charter  of  the  collegiate  church  of  Kilniun,  by  Sir 
Duncan  Campbell  the  knight  of  Lochow,  anno  1445,  Colinus  Campbell  de  Glenorchy,  filius  meus,  is  a 
Tlie  charter  is  in  the  register.     (</}  Chatters  in  the  registers  vouching  all  these  factS' 


■zrz  APPENDIX. 

'ay  the  Earl  of  Athol,  chief  contriver  of  that  barbarous  tragedy  ;  in  recompense  ot 
which  eminent  service  to  trie  crown  and  kingdom,  he  afterwards  got  a  grant  fiom 
King  James  III.  of  the  lands  and  estate  of  Lawers,  to  himself,  and  the  h'-irs-male 
to  be  begotten  betwixt  him  and  Dame  Margaret  Stirling,  then  his  wife  (c),  which 
King  James  V.  afterwards  ratified  and  confirmed  by  his  charter ;  the  preamble 
and  narrative  of  which  bears,  that  the  lands  had  been  given  "  per  nobilissimum 
'•  avum  nostrum  Jacobura  Tertium  bona;  memorias,  quondam  Colino  Campbell  de 
"  Glenorchy,  militi,  et  hasredibus  suis  masculis  inter  ipsum  et  quondam  Margare- 
"  tarn  ytrivelyne  sponsani  suam,  pro  bono  et  fideli  servitio  per  dictum  quondam 
"  dominum  Colinum  factam,  in  arrestatione  et  captione  quondam  Thomae  Chal- 
"  mer,  qui  interfiiit  crudeli  interfectione  quondam  nobilissimi  predecessoris  nostri 
"  Jacobi  Primi  bonae  memoriae."  There  is  another  grant  from  the  crown,  in  the 
records,  of  the  lands  of  Auchuarach,  bearing  date  the  3d  of  November  1466,  to 
the  same  Sir  Colin  and  Dame  Margaret  Stirling,  then  his  lady  (/).  In  the  1485 
Sir  Colin  is  a  witness  to  two  several  charters  granted  by  Malise  Earl  of  Monteith 
to  John  and  Walter  Grahams,  his  younger  sons,  which  is  ratified  by  a  charter 
under  the  Great  Seal  in  the  archives  ;  after  this  he  is  witness  to  a  charter  granted 
by  Angus  Menzies  of  Comrie,  "  Willielmo  Stewart  de  Ballendoran  et  MariotjE 
"  Campbell  sponsae  sua;,  filiae  Colini  Campbell  de  Glenorchy,  de  terris  de  Inner- 
"  erchan  in  comltatii  de  Strathern,  infra  vicecomitatum  de  Perth,  pro  eorum  vita, 
-*  et  Waltero  Stewart,  eorum  filio,  et  haeredibus  suis.  Datam  apud  Lochtay 
"  quinto  Octobris  1498."  Of  three  sons  of  this  Walter  Stewart  of  Balindoran 
are  the  Stewarts  of  Balquhidder  descended. 

This  Sir  Colin  Campbell,  founder  of  the  family  of  Glenorchy,  according  to  the 
memoirs  still  preserved  in  the  family,  was  a  just,  and  generous,  gallant,  and  brave 
man,  eminently  loyal  to  his  several  sovereigns  with  whom  he  was  cotemporary  : 
He  travelled  much  into  foreign  parts,  was  one  of  the  Knights  of  Rhodes,  now  de- 
signed, of  Malta,  and  by  his  conduct  and  valour  acquired  immortal  glory  and 
honour  :  He  lived  to  a  great  age,  and  saw  a  numerous  progeny  descended  of  him- 
self :  He  built  the  house  of  Castle-Kilchurne  in  Glenorchy,  which  is  still  a  seat  of 
the  family,  and  died  in  the  year  1498,  and  was  interred  in  the  chapel  of  the  Bles- 
sed Virgin  at  Finlarig,  at  the  west  end  of  Loch-Tay,  which  continues  to  be  the 
burial  place  of  the  family. 

Sir  Colin  Campbell  of  Glenorchy  married  first  Dame  Mary,  one  of  the  daugh- 
ters of  Duncan  Earl  of  Lennox,  but  she  dying  soon  after  the  marriage  without 
children,  her  estate,  which  was  considerable,  returned  to  the  family  of  Lennox  {^). 
After  her  death  he  married  Dame  Margaret  Stewart,  the  eldest  of  the  three  daugh- 
ters and  co-heirs  of  John  Lord  Lorn,  by  whom  he  had, 

Sir  Duncan  his  heir  ;  with  this  lady  he  got  a  third  of  all  the  lordship  and  estate 
of  Lorn,  which  yet  remains  in  the  family  ;  and  upon  that  account  it  is  that  the 
family  have  always  quartered  the  coat  of  Stewart  Lord  Lorn  with  their  own  pater- 
nal achievement.  He  afterwards  married  Margaret,  daughter  of  Robert  Robert- 
son of  Struan  (/)),  by  whom  he  had  a  son,  John,  who  was  educated  to  the  church, 
and  took  holy  orders ;  and  upon  the  demise  of  Angus,  Bishop  of  the  Isles  (2  ),  he 
was  preferred  to  that  see,  and  in  1506  he  was  joined  in  commission  from  the  crown 
with  David  bishop  of  Argyle,  to  set  in  tack  the  crown  lands  of  Bute  (k).  He 
died  in  the  1 509  (/). 

By  the  said  Margaret  Robertson  he  had  also  a  daughter,  Margaret,  who  was  married 
to  Sir  Archibald  Napier  of  Merchiston  ;  from  two  sons  of  which  marriage  are  de- 
scended the  present  Lord  Napier  (m).  and  Sir  Theophilus  Napier  of  Luttonhoe, 
knight  baronet  in  England  in  the  county  of  Bedford  (?i^. 

(c)  Charter  under  the  Great  Seal  in  the  public  registers,  (f)  In  the  public  archives,  charta  in  Re- 
gistro.  (  g)  Contract  of  marriage  still  extant  in  the  archives  of  this  noble  family,  (i)  Charta  penes 
comitera  de  Breadalbane.  (i)  Vita;  Episcoporura  Sodoren.  MSS.  penes  me.  (i)  Charta  in  pubhcis  . 
archivis  ad  annum  1506.  (/)  VitiE  Epis.  Sodoren.  (/«)  Charta  in  publicis  archivis  Arch.  Napier  de 
Merchiston,  et  Margaretse  Campbell  sponstE  sua*  ad  annum  1509.  (^n^  Cliarta  penes  Dom.  Napier,  and 
'he  Baronage  of  England. 

3. 


APPENDIX.  213 

Sir  Colin  married  again  Margaret,  daughter  of  Luke  Stirling  of  Keir,  an  an(^ent 
family  in  the  shire  of  Perth  (0),  by  whom  he  had  • 

First,  a  son,  John,  ancestor  to  the  family  of  Lawers :  the  eldest  son  of  which 
family  married  the  heiress  of  Loudon  ;  and  upon  fadure  of  issue  of  the  second  son, 
to  whom  the  estate  descended,  it  returned  to  t\Lijor-General  Campbell,  uncle  to 
the  present  Earl  of  Loudon. 

Secondly,  a  daughter,  Helen,  w  ho  was  manned  to  William  Stewart  of  Balin- 
doran  or  Balquhidder,  grandson  of  Murdoch  Duke  of  Albany  (/)),  of  whom  are 
descended  a  numerous  tribe  of  the  Stewarts  in  Balquhidder,  in  tlie  west  end  of 
Perthshire. 

Sir  Duncan  Campbell  succeeded  his  father  Sir  Colin,  whose  estate  having  be- 
come very  considerable,  he  had  his  designation  from  it,  even  in  h»s  father's  life- 
time, as  appears  by  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal  in  the  records,  bearing  date  the 
26th  February  14S0  {g),  erecting  several  lands  in  the  barony  of  Kilmichael, 
"  Colino  Comiti  de  Argyle,  ct  hasredibus  masculis  de  corpore  suo  legitime  pro- 
"  creatis,  sen  procreandis ;  quibus  deficientibus,  Duncano  Campbell  de  Glen- 
"  orchy  ;"  which  fr.iling,  to  several  other  substitutes  in  the  course  of  succession 
therein  described.  Sir  l^uncan  was  in  a  good  degree  of  confidence  with  his  sove- 
reign King  Jarnes  IV.  and  shared  in  his  favours  ;  for  he  obtained  from  him  a 
grant  of  a  royal  baihary,  first  temporary,  and  afterwards  perpetual,  extant  in  the 
public  archives,  "  dilecto  familiari  suo  D.  Tuncano  Campbell  de  Glenorchy,  pro 
"  suo  fideli  servi'-io  nobis  impenso  et  impendendo  oSicium  Baliatus  omnium  et 
"  singularum  terrarum  nostrarum  de  D3-sher,  Toyer,  Glenlyon  ac  baroniae  de 
"  Glendochart."  This  grant  is  dated  3d  September  1498  (r)  :  He  also  obtained 
another  grant  from  the  king  of  the  port  of  Loch-Tay  (s),  and  a  third  grant  of  die 
lands  of  Glenlyon,  to  himself  in  liferent,  and  to  Archibald  Campbell  his  son,  in 
fee,  and  the  heirs-male  of  his  body  ;  which  failing,  to  Patrick  Campbell  his  bro- 
ther-german  ;  and,  failing  his  heirs-male,  to  John  Campbell,  son  to  the  deceased 
Sir  Colin  Campoell  of  Glenorchy,  who  was  ancestor  to  the  family  of  Lawers.  The 
charter  is  dated  the  7th  of  September  1502  Q)  ;  and  in  the  year  1503,  he  acquired 
the  lands  and  barony  of  Finlarig,  lying  in  the  lordship  of  Glendochart,  in  the 
sherifl'dom  of  Perth.  The  charter  of  which  lands  is  dated  22d  of  April  in  that 
year  («).  Sir  Duncan  accompanied  his  sovereign  King  James  IV.  to  the  battle  of 
Flodden,  where  he  was  slain,  v/ith  his  master  and  the  flower  of  the  nobility  and 
gentry  of  Scotland,  on  the  unfortunately  memorable  9th  of  September  1513  (,v). 
His  body,  being  known  by  his  friends  and  followers,  was  brought  off  the  ^eld,  and 
carried  to  the  chapel  of  Finlarig,  where  it  was  interred. 

Sir  Duncan  Campbell,  in  the  year  1476,  married  the  Lady  Margaret  Douglas, 
daughter  of  George  Earl  of  Angus,  and  sister  to  Archibald  then  Earl  of  Angus  ()'); 
by  which  marriage  he  strengiho;ned  his  family  with  many  great  and  noble  alli- 
ances. In  the  contract  of  marriage,  which  is  by  way  of  solemn  indenture,  the 
Earl  of  Angus,  the  lady's  brother,  is  party-contractor  for  her  :  the  portion  con- 
tracted is  6o3  merks ;  for  payment  whereof  Robert  Douglas  of  Lochleven,  an- 
cestor to  the  present  Earl  of  Morton,  and  Alexander  Ramsay  of  Dalhousie,  prede- 
cessor to  the  Earl  of  Dalhousie,  the  lady's  brother-in-law,  became  cautioners,  and 
Elizabeth  Countess  Dowager  of  Angus,  her  mother,  gave  the  cautioners  her  bond 
for  their  rehef.  This  marriage  brought  many  noble  and  honourable  alliances  to 
the  family;  for  the  lady  had  one  sister  married  into  the  family  of  Rothes,  another 
to  the  Lord  Graham,  ancestor  to  the  Duke  of  Montrose,  a  third  to  the  Laird  of 
Dalhousie,  ancestor  to  the  Earl  of  Dalhousie,  and  a  fourth  to  Robert  Graham  of 
Fintry.     By  this  lady  Sir  Duncan  had  issue, 

(0)  Charta  penes  Dominum  Lawers,  etiam  charta  in  publicis  archivi?,  ad  annum  1525.  Ifi)  Charta 
in  publicis  archivis,  ad  annum  1464,  terrarum  de  Ballndoran  Jacobo  de  Albania.  (y)  In  the  public 
registers.  (r)  Charter  under  the  Great  Seal  by  King  James  IV.  in  the  registers.  (.1)  A  charter  in  the 
records,  of  the  date  the  4th  of  July  1498-  (()  Charta  in  rotulis  Jacobi  {Juarii  ad  annum  1502.  (a)  Charta 
In  registro  ad  annum  1503.  (t)  Charta  penes  comitem  de  Breadalbane.  (1)  Charta  penes  ducem  de 
Douglas,  and  Mr  Hume's  History  of  the  House  of  Douglas,  and  the  life  of  Gavin  bishop  of 
Dunkeld. 

Vol.  1L  6  P 


214  APPENDIX. 

First,  Sir  Colin,  who  succeeded  him. 

Secondly,  Archibald,  who  was  provided  to  the  fee  of  the  estate  of  Glenlyon,  in 
the  charter  thereof  granted  by  the  king  to  his  father  (a),  and  was  ancestor  to  the 
branch  of  the  Campbells  of  Glenlyon. 

Thirdly,  Patrick.,  who  is  substitute  to  his  brother  in  the  succession  of  that 
estate  (b). 

And  fourthly,  A  daughter,  who  was  married  to  the  Laird  of  Monyvaird  in  the 
shire  of  Perth  (<■}. 

Sir  Colin  Campbell,  the  second  son  of  that  name,  and  third  in  the  course  of  suc- 
cession of  this  noble  family,  was  a  very  accomplished  gentleman  ;  his  relation  to 
the  House  of  Angus  linked  him  in  a  firm  friendship  with  the  Douglases  and  the 
Earl  of  Angus.*  It  is  no  small  addition  to  the  honour  of  his  memory,  that  he  was 
of  great  use,  and  very  aiding  and  assisting  to  his  cousin-german.  the  learned  and 
famous  Gavin  Douglas,  Provost  of  St  Giles,  in  procuring  him  peaceable  possession 
of  the  Episcopal  See  of  Dunkeld,  to  which  he  was  promoted  in  the  year  1514  (J), 
against  a  very  powerful  competitor,  Andrew  Stewart,  Prebend  of  Craig,  brother 
to  the  Earl  of  Athol,  for  nothing  else  but  the  just  esteem  and  regard  which  Sir 
Colin  had  for  the  merit  of  that  great  prelate,  who  was  one  of  the  chief  ornaments 
of  his  age,  could  have  so  zealously  attached  him  to  his  interest,  notwithstanding 
the  relation  he  stood  to  him  in  blood,  in  opposition  to  that  of  Mr  Stewart,  who  was 
his  brother-in-law. 

Sir  Colin  Campbell  of  Glenorchy  married  the  Lady  Margaret  Stewart,  daugh- 
ter of  John  Earl  of  Athol,  (who  was  uterine  brother  to  King  James  IL)  by  his 
second  lady' Dame  Eleanora  Sinclair,  daughter  of  William  the  great  Earl  of  Ork- 
ney, who  was  Lord  Chancellor  in  the  reign  of  King  James  IL  (<?).  This  marriage 
increased  the  honour  and  interest  of  the  family,  by  the  addition  of  many  great 
and  noble  alliances  of  the  first  rank  and  quality  in  the  kingdom,  particularly  the 
lady's  youngest  sister  was  married  to  John  Earl  of  Lennox,  by  whom  she  was  mo- 
ther to  Mathew  Earl  of  Lennox,  who  was  Regent  of  Scotland  in  the  minority  of 
King  James  VI.  of  Scotland,  his  grandson,  and  the  first  monarch  of  Great  Britain ; 
and  by  the  said  Lady  Margarfet  Stewart  Sir  Colin  had  issue  three  sons,  Duncan, 
John,  and  Colin,  who  were  all  successively  Knights  of  Glenorchy;  and  a  daughter 
Katharine,  who  was  married  to  Sir  William  Murray  of  Tullibardin,  ancestor  to  the 
Duke  of  Athol.  Her  daughter  was  mother  to  the  Earl  of  Marr,  Treasurer  of  Scot- 
land (/). 

Sir  Duncan  Campbell,  second  of  that  name,  and  the  fourth  lineal  representative 
of  this  noble  family,  married  Dame  Margaret  Colquhoun,  daughter  of  Sir  John 
Colquhoun  of  Luss,  Knight,  a  very  ancient  and  honourable  family  in  the  west,  by 
Dame  Agnes  Stewart,  his  wife,  daughter  of  Matthew  Earl  of  Lennox  (^),  by 
whom  he  had  only  one  daughter,  Margaret,  who  was  married  to  John  M'Dougall 
of  Raray  in  Lorn,  a  family  of  great  antiquity.  Sir  Duncan  died  in  the  year  1534  {h), 
and  in  default  of  heirs-male,  to  whom  the  estate  was  provided,  he  was  succeeded 
by  his  brother 

John  Campbell  of  Glenorchy,  who  married  Dame  Marion  Edmonstone,  daugh- 
ter of  Sir  Archibald  Edmonstone  of  Duntreath,  a  family  nobly  descended,  posses- 
sed of  an  opulent  fortune,  and  supported  by  many  noble  alliances.  By  her  he  had 
no  male  issue,  but  only  two  daughters, 

Margaret  who  was  married  to  Alexander  Home  of  Argaty  in  the  county  of 
Perth.     And 

Christian,  the  second,  to  Edward  Redheugh  of  Cultabragin,  in  the  same  coun- 
ty (/);  and  upon  his  demise  he  was  succeeded  by  his  brother 

(«)  Charter  in  tlie  registers,  (i)  Ibidem.  W  Charta  penes  comitem  de  Breadalbane.  (</)  Life  of 
Gavin  Bishop  of  Dunkeld,  prefixed  to  his  noble  translation  of  Virgil,  (f)  Lives  of  the  Officers  of  State. 
(/)  Charta  in  publicis  archivis  Willielmo  Murray  de  TuUybardine,  et  Catharine  Campbell  sponsse  sua;, 
ad  annum   153S.  (^)  Charta  in  publicis  archivis  ad  annum  1498.         (A)  Charta  in  publicis  archivis, . 

(j)  From  vouchers  in  the  registers  in  the  i  J58,  it  appears,  that  these  two  ladies,  the  heirs  of  line,  and  at  law, 
of  John  Campbell  of  Glenorchy,  make  over  their  title  of  the  lands  of  Ardbeath,  to  Cohn  Campbell  of 
Glenorchy,  their  uncle. 


APPENDIX.  215 

Sir  Colin  Campbell  of  Glenorchy.  He  had  the  character  and  reputation  of  a 
gentleman  of  great  wisdom  and  prudence.  He  built  the  House  of  Tayniouth  in 
Bieadalbane,  now  the  principal  seat  of  the  family,  and  another  seat  at  Edniample, 
which,  with  that  estate,  became  afterwards  a  patrimony  to  a  younger  brother  of 
the  family.  He  was  among  the  first  of  his  quality  who  went  into  the  reformation 
of  the  church,  not  in  a  tumultuary,  but  regular  manner,  by  addressing  the  Queen 
Regent,  in  whom  the  government  was  tlien  lodged,  to  grant  the  reformers  the  ex- 
ercise of  their  religion,  at  least  till  matters  were  regularly  settled  in  a  legal  way, 
and  wus  on  the  side  ot  the  reformed  in  the  Parliament  1560,  w  hen  the  Protestant  doc- 
trine first  received  the  sanction  of  law.  Sir  Colin  being  in  firm  friendship  with 
the  Earl  of  Marr,  smd  a  great  confident  of  his  during  his  regency,  was  in  the  year 
1573  joined  in  commission  with  the  Earl  of  Morton,  the  Lord  Chancellor,  the 
Lord  Ruthven,  afterwards  Earl  of  Cowrie,  the  Lord  Treasurer,  the  Secretary  of 
State,  the  Commendator  of  Dunfermline,  the  Lord  Register,  M'Gill  of  Netiier- 
Rankeillor,  the  Lord  Justice  Clerk,  and  others,  for  settling  a  firm  and  lasting  poli- 
cy and  government  in  the  church  (a).  He  died  in  the  year  1584,  and  was  inter- 
red among  his  ancestors  in  the  cliapel  of  Finlarig. 

Sir  CoLiiV  married  Dame  Katharine  Ruthven,  daughter  of  William  Lord  Ruth- 
ven the  great  reformer,  by  Dame  Janet  Halyburton,  one  of  the  three  daughters, 
and  co-heirs  of  Patrick  Lord  Halyburton  of  Dirleton.  This  marriage  brought  a 
numerous  train  of  relations  to  the  family  (b);  for  the  lady  had  a  sister,  Dame 
Lilias  Ruthven,  who  was  married  to  David  Lord  Drummond,  ancestor  to  the 
family  of  Perth,  another  to  the  Lord  Gray,  and  a  third  to  Sir  David  Wemyss  of  that 
Ilk,  progenitor  of  the  Earl  of  Wemyss  ;  and  others  of  them  were  married  to 
the  barons  of  Strathurd,  Aldie,  Lundin  of  Lundin,  Elphinstone,  and  the  ancient 
family  of  Wood  of  Bonnyton ;  and  by  that  marriage  Sir  Colin  had  issue. 

First,  Sir  Duncan,  his  eldest  son  and  successor. 

Second,  Colin  Campbell  of  Ardbeath  (c). 

Third,  Mr  Patrick.  Caripsell  of  Auchinryre,  who  dying  without  issue,  the  lands 
returned  to  the  family. 

Fourth,  Archibald  Campbell,  who  got  a  part  of  the  barony  of  Monzie,  by  the 
marriage  of  Margaret,  daughter  and  heir  of  Andrew  Toshach  of  Monzie  (t/),  and 
likewise  died  without  issue  ;  and  four  daughters. 

First,  Beatrix,  married  to  Sir  John  Campbell  of  Lawers,  ancestor  to  the  Earl 
of  Loudon,  and  from  a  younger  son  the  family  of  Aberuchill  is  descended  (e). 

Second,  Margaret,  married  to  James  Earl  of  Glencairn,  to  whom  she  had  Wil- 
liam Earl  of  Glencairn,  and  several  daughters,  all  honourably  married,  and  from  - 
whom  several  noble  families  are  descended,  viz.  Katharine,  the  eldest,  married  to  Sir 
James  Cunningham  of  Glengarnock  ;  Anne,  the  second,  to  James  the  second  Mar- 
quis of  the  illustrious  House  of  Hamilton,  by  whom  she  was  mother  to  James  and 
William,  both  Dukes  of  Hamilton  ;  Margaret,  the  third,  to  Sir  James  Hamilton, 
Baron  of  Evandale,  and  afterwards  to  Sir  James  Maxwell  of  Calderwood  ;  Mary, 
the  fourth,  to  John  Crawford  of  Kilbirnie,  ancestor  to  the  Viscount  of  Garnock  ; 
and  Susan,  the  fifth,   to  Alexander  Lauder  of  Hatton. 

Third,  Mary,  married  to  John  Earl  of  Monteith  (^fj,  by  whom  he  had  William 
Earl  of  Airth  and  iNIonteith,  afterwards  Earl  of  Strathern,  Lord  President  of  the 
Council  in  the  reign  of  King  Charles  I.  and  a  daughter  Christian,  who  was  married 
to  Sir  John  Blackadder  of  TuUiallan,  Bart.;  and  after  the  Earl's  death  she  was 
married  to  Sir  Colin  Campbell  of  Lundie,  son  to  the  Earl  of  Argyle. 

Fourth,  Elizabeth,  married  to  Sir  John  Campbell  of  Ardkinlas,  of  whom  that 
family  is  descended. 

Sir  Duncan  Campbell  of  Glenorchy  succeeded  his  father.  Sir  Colin.  His  great 
parts  and  integrity  procured  him  the  favour  and  esteem  of  King  James  VI.  who 

(fl)  Bishop  Spottisvvood's  History  of  the  Church  of  Scotland,  (i)  Spottisvvood's  MSS.  of  the  House  of 
Ruthven.  (<-)   Charta  in  rotulis,  ad  annum  1558.  (d)  Charta  in  publicis  archivis,  ad  annum  1584. 

(^e)  Colin  Campbell,  the  second  son  of  Sir  John  Campbell  of  Lawers,  got  a  charter  from  his  father  of  the 
lands  of  Aberuchill  in  the  ijijC-  (/)  Charta  penes  ducem  de  Montrose,  ad  annum  1587.  (|-)  Mr  Ry- 
mer'sFoedera  Anglis. 


zi6  APPENDIX. 

named  him  one  of  the  barons  that  assisted  at  the  coronation  of  Queen  Anne,  his 
royal  consort  (a),  the  i8th  of  May  1590,  when  he  had  the  honour  of  knighthood- 
conferred  upon  him.  In  the  reign  of  King  Charles  I.  he  was  made  Sheriff-Princi- 
pal of  the  sherilldom  of  Perth,  an  office  that  had  formerly  been  hereditary  in  the 
family  of  Gowiie,  which  he  enjoyed  till  his  death.  He  was  also  advanced  to  the 
dignity  of  a  Knight  Baronet,  by  patent  bearing  date  30th  June  1672.  and  at  the 
same  time  got  a  grant  of  ic  or  15,000  acres  of  land  in  Nova  Scotia  (4).  And  as  this  fa- 
mily had  the  keeping  of  the  royal  forestry  of  Mamlorn,  Berenakansauche,  alias 
Bendaskerlie,  Finglenbeg,  and  Finglenmore,  for  a  long  time,  by  temporary  grants 
from  the  crown,  he,  in  the  year  161 7,  obtained  the  heritable  right  thereof  to  him- 
self and  his  heirs-male,-  with  ample  privileges  (c).  The  said  Sir  Duncan  died  in 
the  month  of  June  1631,  and  was  interred  in  the  burial-place  of  the  family  at  the 
chapel  of  Finlarig  (rf). 

Sir  Duncan  married  first  Lady  Jean  Stewart,  daughter  of  John  Earl  of  Athol, 
sometime  Lord  Chancellor,  by  Dame  Margaret  his  wife,  daughter  of  Malcolm  Lord 
Fleming,  ancestor  to  the  Earl  of  Wigton.  This  lady  had  two  sisters,  Grisel, 
Countess  of  Crawford,  and  Anne,  Countess  of  Errol ;  and,  by  her,  Sir  Duncan 
had  a  numerous  issue  of  both  sexes,  which  made  a  considerable  addition  to  the  alli- 
ances and  relations  of  the  family,  already  so  numerous  as  to  vie  with  any  other  in 
the  kingdom,  viz. 

First,  Sir  Colin  who  succeeded  him. 

Second,  Sir  Robert  Campbell  of  Glenfalloch,  who  succeeded  his  brother. 

Third,  Duncan,  who  died  young. 

Fourth,  John. 

Fifth,  Archibald  of  Monzie,  of  whom  are  descended  the  Campbells  of  Loch- 
land  and  Finnab,  and  several  others. 

Sixth,  Duncan, 

Seventh,  Alexander,  who  both  died  young;  and  three  daughters, 

First,  Jean,  married  to  Sir  John  Campbell  of  Calder,  Knight,  of  whom  John 
Campbell  of  Calder,  Esq.  is  the  lineal  heir. 

Second,  Anne,  married  to  Sir  Patrick  Ogilvie  of  Inchmartin,  ancestor  to  the  pre- 
sent Earl  of  Findlater  and  Seafield. 

Third,  Margaret,  married  to  Sir  Alexander  Menzies  of  Weem,  Knight.  After 
the  death  of  Lady  Jean  Stewart,  Sir  Duncan  married  Dame  Elizabeth  Sinclair, 
daughter  of  Patrick  Lord  Sinclair,  by  whom  he  had  a  son 

Patrick  Campbell,  to  whom  his  father  gave  in  patrimony  the  lands  and  barony 
of  Edinample,  and  a  daughter 

Jean,  who  was  married  to  John  Earl  of  Athol,  mother  by  him  to  John  the  first 
Marquis  of  Athol. 

Sir  Colin  Campbell  of  Glenorchy,  the  second  baronet  of  the  family,  succeeded 
his  father  in  his  honours  and  estate.  He  married  Juliana,  daughter  of  Hugh  Earl 
of  Loudon  ;  but  dying  without  issue  in  September  1640  (c),  he  was  succeeded  by 
bis  brother 

Sir  Robert  Campbell  of  Glenorchy,  formerly  of  Glenfalloch,  who,  in  the  life- 
time of  his  brother,  married  Isabel,  daughter  of  Sir  Lauchlan  M'Intosh  of  Tore- 
castle,  Captain  of  the  Clan-Chattan,  a  powerful  tribe  in  the  Highlands,  by  Dame 
Agnes  Mackenzie  his  wife,  daughter  of  Kenneth  Mackenzie  of  Kintail,  ances- 
tor to  the  Earl  of  Seaforth,  by  whom  he  had  a  great  many  children  of  both 
sexes. 

First,  Sir  John,  his  eldest  son  and  successor. 

Second,  Sir  Colin  Campbell  of  Monchaster,  predecessor  to  Campbell  of  Car- 
whin. 

Third,  William  Campbell  of  Glenfalloch. 

Fourth,  Alexander  Campbell  of  Lochdochart. 

Fifth,  Duncan  Campbell  of  Auchlyne,  and  the  following  daughters, 

(a)  Mr  Rymer's  Foedera  Anglias.  {b)  Patent  in  the  registers-  Chart 
de  Bieadalbane.  (r^  Charta  in  publicis  archivis,  ad  aiHium  1617-  WJCha 
{e)  RetDur  in  the  Chancery. 


APPENDIX.  217 

First,  Margaret,  who  was  manicd  to  John  Cinieion  of  Locliiel,  Captain  of 
the  Clan  Cameron,  to  whom  slic  had  the  famous  and  brave  Sir  Evan  Cameron. 

Second,  Mar.y,  raanied  to  James  Campbell  of  Ardknila^ ;  their  son  Sa-  Colin 
was  the  lir>t  baronet  of  the  family. 

'Ihad,  Jean,  married  to  Duncan  Stewart  of  Appin,  by  whom  he  had  only  one 
da;  gtlier,  Margaret,  married  to  Ale.\ander  Campbell  of  Loclmell,  by  whom  she 
was  mother  to  Sir  Duncan  Campbell  of  Lochnell. 

Fourth,  IsABELL,  married  to  Robert  Irvine  of  Fedderet,  son  to  Sir  Alexander  Ir- 
vine of  Drum,  by  whom  he  had  two  daughters,  his  heirs  ;  the  one  was  married  to 
Gordon  of  Gight,  and  the  other  to  Thomas  Fiaser  of  Strichen. 

Fifth,  JuLiANE,  married  to  John  M'Lean  of  Lochbowie. 

Sixth, to  Robertson  of  Lude. 

to  Robertson  of  Fascalkie. 

to  Toshach  of  Monivand. 

ta  Campbell  of  Glenlyon. 

Sir  John  Campbell  of  Glenorchy,  the  fourth  baronet  in  this  lionourablo  family, 
wai  a  gentleman  of  good  parts,  and  great  honour  and  integrity,  which  gained  him 
universal  esteem.  He  married  Lady  Mary  Graham,  daughter  of  William  Earl  ot 
Monteith,  Strathern,  and  Airth,  Lord  Justice-General  in  the  reign  of  King  Cliarles 
I.  by  Agnes  his  wife,  daughter  to  Patrick  Lord  Gray  ;  and  by  the  said  Lady  Mary 
he  had  issue  one  son, 

John,  who  was  afterwards  created  Earl  of  Breadalbane;  and  a  daughter,  who 
was  married  to  Sir  Alexander  Menzies  of  Weem,  Baronet.  After  the  death  of  his 
fir^i  lady  he  married  Christian,  daughter  of  John  Mushet  of  Craighead  in  Mon- 
teith, by  whom  he  had  several  daughters,  of  whom  are  descended  Archibald 
Campbell  of  StonenelJ,  present  Sherifl"  of  Argyle,  the  family  of  M'Naaghtan  of 
that  iik.  Campbell  of  Aiids,  Campbell  of  Ardchattan,  and  several  others. 

Isir  John  Campbell,  the  fifth  baronet  in  the  tamily  of  Glenorchy,  having,  dur- 
ing the  times  of  the  usurpation,  testified  his  duty  and  lojalty  to  his  exiled  sove- 
reign King  Charles  II.  by  his  counsel,  and  the  assistance  he  gave  to  the  forces  that 
appeared  for  his  majesty  in  the  Highlands,  under  the  command  of  Lieutenant  Ge- 
neral Middleton,  as  well  as  by  using  his  utmost  endeavours  with  General  Monk, 
to  declare  for  a  free  Parliament,  which  was  judged  the  most  effectual  way  tor  re- 
storing the  king ;  he  was  for  these  services,  and  other  considerations,  taken  into 
the  king's  favour  and  confidence.  He  served  in  Parliament  as  representative  of 
the  shire  of  Argyle,  in  which  he  zealously  concurred  with  other  royalists  in  re- 
scinding tiie  acts,  that  had  been  made  during  the  war,  limiting  the  royal  preroga- 
tive, and  restoring  things  to  the  same  state  they  were  in  before  the  king's  affairs 
were  embarrassed.  Sir  John  Campbell  was  a  man  of  great  penetration  and 
judgment;  he  acquired  from  the  Earl  nf  Caithness  the  whol'C  estate  of  the  earldom 
of  Caithness ;  an.i  that  earl  likewise  resigned  his  honours  in  the  king's  hands,  in 
favour  of  Sir  John  Campbell  after  his  own  death  ;  accordingly,  upon  his  demise, 
Sir  John  was  created  Earl  nf  Caithness,  by  letters  patent  under  the  Great  Seal, 
granted  to  him  and  his  heirs-male,  28th  June  1677  («)  ;  which  title,  in  the  year 
1681,  he  exchanged,  by  his  n'ajesty's  appr(>bation,  for  that  of  Earl  of  Breadalbane, 
taken  from  his  paternal  estate  (b).  His  Lordship  was  m  great  favour  with  King 
James  VII.  one  of  his  Privy  Council,  and  a  faithful  adherent  to  his  interest  while 
any  hopes  of  serving  him  remained  :  But  these  views  being  disappointed  by  the 
revolution,  and  he,  out  of  aifection  to  his  country,  desirous  to  have  the  peace  ot 
it  settled,  he  submitted  to  the  nei*'  goveriiment,  and  undertook  to  use  his  endea- 
vours to  prevail  with  the  heads  ni'  the  clans  to  lay  down  their  arms.  This  gave  a 
handle  to  his  enemies  to  chalknge  his  conduct,  and  even  to  arraign  him  in  the 
Parliament  1695  ;  but  the  bare  laying  open  his  transactions  defeated  rheir  designs, 
and  sufficiently  vindicated  his  maiia'rement  fr-mi  all  the  aspersions  and  calunmies 
injuriously  tb  own  out  against  it,  and  most  unjustly  defend-.-d  by  Bishop  Buinet, 
who,  as  he  l.aJ  no  opportunity  of  co  nin?  at  the  truth  of  this  matter,  was  never 
very  anxiou^  11  discovering  it,  when  it  did  not  serve  his  turn.  But  as  this  is  not 
a  proper  place  to  enlarge  on  things  of  this  nature,  it  shall  be  no  farther  insisteii  iIl^ 

(«)  Charta  in  canccUarla.     (.h)  Ibidem  ad  annum  1681. 

Vol.  XL  6  Q^ 


2i8  APPENDIX. 

though  it  can  be  evidenced  to  conviction;  and  King  William  was  so  sensible  of  the 
injustice  done  to  the  Earl,  that  he  resented  the  hard  usage  he  met  with  from  his 
ministry.  His  Lordship  was  a  sincere  lover  of  his  country,  and  his  zeal  for  the  ho- 
hour  and  independency  of  it,  which  he  conceived  greatly  prejudged  by  the  treaty 
of  Union,  induced  him  to  act  in  concert  with  those  wiio  were  in  arms  in  1715  ; 
but,  by  reason  of  his  advanced  age,  and  the  firm  adherence  of  his  son  the  Lord 
Glenorchy,  now  Earl  of  Breadalbane,  to  the  government,  he  was  not  included  in 
the  attainder  which  was  pronounced  against  the  other  noblemen  and  gentlemen, 
who  were  embarked  in  that  unfortunate  design. 

His  lordship  married  first  the  Lady  Mary  Rich,  daughter  of  the  noble  and  va- 
liant Henry  Earl  of  Holland  in  England,  by  his  Lady  Elizabeth,  daughter  and 
heir  of  Sir  Walter  Cope  of  Kensington.  This  Henry  was  son  of  Robert  Earl  of 
Warwick,  by  the  Lady  Penelope  his  wife,  daughter  of  Walter  Earl  of  Essex,  who 
was  ambassador  and  plenipotentiary  in  the  treaty  of  marriage  between  King 
Cliarles  L  and  Henrietta  Maria,  daughter  of  Henry  IV.  of  France.  He  was  Cap- 
tain of  the  Guard,  Groom  of  the  Stole,  General  of  the  Horse,  in  the  first  expedi- 
tion to  Scotland  in  the  1639,  and  Knight  of  the  Most  Noble  Order  of  the  Garter. 
He  suflered  for  his  loyalty  with  the  Duke  of  Hamilton,  by  the  same  pretended 
court  of  justice  that  had  proceeded  against  the  king  in  the  1649.  By  Elizabeth 
Countess  of  Holland,  daughter  and  heir  of  Sir  Walter  Cope  of  Kensington,  he  had 
Robert  Earl  of  Warwick  and  Holland;  and,  besides  the  Earl  of  Breadalbane's  lady, 
he  had  three  other  daughters,  the  Lady  Frances,  who  was  married  to  WiUiam 
Lord  Paget,  Lady  Isabella  to  Sir  James  Thynne  of  Longleate,  ancestor  to  the  pre- 
sent Viscount  of  Weymouth,  and  Lady  Susan  to  James  Earl  of  Suffolk  :  By  the 
above  Lady  Mary  P.ich  the  Earl  of  Breadalbane  had  two  sons, 

Duncan,  who  died  unmarried;  and 

John  Lord  Glenorchy,  who  succeeded  him  in  his  honours  and  estate.  After  her 
death  he  married  Lady  Mary  Campbell,  daughter  of  Archibald  Marquis  of  Argyle, 
Countess  Dowager  of  Caithness  ;  by  whom  he  had  a  son 

Mr  Colin  Campbell,  who  died  unmarried.     He  had  likewise  a  daughter, 

Lady  Mary,  who  was  married  to  Archibald  Cockburn  of  Lanton,  who  has  left 
by  her  two  sons  and  a  daughter.  The  eldest  of  which  sons  is  the  present  Sir  Alex- 
ander Cockburn,  Baronet. 

John,  the  second  Earl  of  Breadalbane,  is  Lord  Lieutenant  of  the  county  of  Perth, 
and  one  of  the  sixteen  peers  who  represent  Scotland  in  the  British  Parliament. 
His  Lordship  married  first  the  Lady  Frances  Cavendish,  the  eldest  daughter,  and 
one  of  the  co-heirs  of  Henry  Duke  of  Newcastle,  by  which  he  became  allied 
to  many  great  and  noble  families  in  England ;  for  the  Duke  had  another  daughter 
married  to  the  Earl  of  Thanet,  another  to  the  Earl  of  Clare,  created  Duke  of 
Newcastle,  a  third  married  to  the  Duke  of  Albemarle,  a  fourth  to  the  Earl  of 
Sunderland,  who  was  Secretary  of  State  in  the  reign  of  Queen  Anne,  to  whom  she 
had  a  daughter,  Countess  of  Carlisle  ;  but  the  Lady  Frances  Cavendish  died  with- 
out any  surviving  issue. 

His  Lordship  married  a  second  lady,  Henrietta,  daughter  of  Sir  Edward  Villiers, 
knight,  fourth  son  of  Edward  Viscount  of  Grandison,  who  was  brother  to  George 
the  great  Duke  of  Buckingham,  the  favourite  of  two  succeeding  monarchs,  (James 
VL  and  Chales  L)  Her  sisters,  who  were  all  nobly  married,  Barbara  to  John 
Viscount  Fitzharding,  Anne  to  William  Earl  of  Portland,  Elizabeth  to  George 
Earl  of  Orkney,  Mary  to  William  Earl  of  Inchiquin,  and  Katharine  first  to  the 
Marquis  de  Pizzare,  a  French  gentleman,  and  afterwards  to  William  Villiers, 
Esq.  a  relation  of  her  own.  The  Lady  Frances  Villiers,  wife  of  Sir  Edward  Vil- 
liers, was  dau,a;hter  of  Theophilus  Howard  Earl  of  Suffolk,  by  the  Lady  Elizabeth 
Hume,  his  wife,  daughter  and  co-heir  of  George  Earl  of  Dunbar,  Lord  High  Trea- 
surer of  Scotland  in  the  reign  of  King  James  VL  Sir  Edward  Villiers  was,  by 
King  William,  created  Earl  of  Jersey. 

By  Henrietta  Countess  of  Breadalbane  the  Earl  has  had  issue, 

1st,  John  Lord  Glenorchy,  his  only  son  and  heir  apparent;  and  two  daugh- 
ters. 

Lady  Charlotte  Campbell,  a  young  lady  of  great  beauty  and  extraordinary 
accomplishments,  who  died  unmarried  universally  lamented  ;  and 


APPENDIX.  219 

Lady  Henrietta  Campbell,  who,  in  1736,  was  appointed  one  of  the  Ladies  of 
the  Bed-chamber  to  their  Royal  Highnesses  the  Princesses  Ameha  and  Carolina  ; 
in  which  honourable  station  her  ladyship  still  continues. 

John,  Lord  Glenorchy,  son  and  apparent  heir  of  the  said  John  Earl  of  Breadal- 
bane,  in  the  year  171 8  was  made  Master  of  the  Horse  to  the  Princess  Royal  of 
Great  Britain:  and  in  the  1720  sent  Envoy  Extraordinary  and  Plenipotentiary  to 
the  King  of  Denmark  :  In  which  honourable  office  he  continued  till  the  death  of 
his  Danish  majesty  in  1730.  In  1725  his  Lordship  was  created  one  of  the  Knights 
of  the  Most  Honourable  Order  of  the  Bath,  upon  the  revival  of  that  order,  which 
has  been  long  in  desuetude.  In  the  1727  his  Lordship  was  elected  member  of 
Parliament  for  the  borough  of  Saltash,  in  the  county  of  Cornwall;  which  place  he 
still  represents. 

His  Lordship,  in  171 8,  married  the  laiy  Amabell  de  Grey,  eldest  daughter  of 
Henry  Duke  of  Kent,  by  Jemima  his  lady,  daughter  of  the  Lord  Crew ;  by  whom 
he  had  one  son, 

Henry,  who  died  in  his  infancy,  and  one  daughter  called  Jemima ;  who,  by 
the  death  of  her  grandfather,  the  Duke  of  Kent,  ni  the  year  1740,  succeeded  to 
his  Grace's  estate,  and  to  his  title  of  Marquis  Grey,  as  likewise  to  ths  barony  of 
Lucas  of  Crudwell.  Her  Ladyship  is  married  to  the  honourable  Philip  Yorke,  eldest 
son  and  heir  apparent  of  the  Right  Honourable  Philip  Lord  Hardwicke,  Lord  High 
Chancellor  of  Great  Britain.  His  Lordship  afterwards,  in  i  730,  married  Mistress 
Arabella  Pershal),  grand-daughter  and  heiress  of  Sir  Thomas  Pershall  of  Sugnall, 
in  the  county  of  Stafford,  Baronet,  a  very  ancient  and  honourable  family ;  by 
which  marriage  his  Lordship  now  enjoys  a  considerable  estate  in  that  county ;  and 
by  the  lady  he  has  two  sons, 

George,  Master  of  Glenorchy,  and  John  Campbell,  Esq. 

The  armorial  achievement  of  the  noble  family  of  Breadalbane  is  blazoned  on 
the  31st  page  of  the  First  Volume  of  this  System. 


SHANK  OF  THAT  Ilk. 


SHANK  of  that  Ilk  was  a  very  ancient  family  in  Mid-Lothian,  where,  to  this 
day,  it  gives  name  to  a  plentiful  fortune. 

Murdoch  Shank,  who  was  an  immediate  son  of  Shank  of  that  Ilk,  settled  in 
Kinghorn  in   Fife,  and    got   lands    there   in    the    reign   of  Robert    Bruce,  arino 

1319- 

By  a  charter  of  confirmation  (^anno  1360)  of  the  mortification  of  a  chapel  and 
hospital  in  Kinghorn,  the  lands  of  Robert  Shank  are  mentioned  as  part  of  the 
boundaries  of  said  chapel  and  hospital  ;  the  bounding  clause  of  the  charter  is  as 
follows  ;  "  Nee  non  dare,  concedere,  et  hac  piKsenti  carta  mea  confirmare,  et  in 
"  contemplatione,  et  intuitu  pro  perpetuo,  Deo  et  gloriosissima;  A'lariie  Virgini, 
"  et  Sancto  Jacobo,  et  omnibus  Sanctis,  in  supplementum  sustentationis  miserabi- 
"  liuni  personarum,  et  pauperum  in  dicta  hospitali  comniorantium,  at  pauperum 
"  in  ea.  casta  fide  ;  tres  missas  celebrari  in  perpetaum,  pro  salute  animarum  patris 
"  msi  et  matris  meas,  et  anrecessorum  et  successorum  meorum,  fundum  et  terram 
"  super  quibus  diet,  capella  et  hospitalis  aedificat.  erant  in  omnibus  boundis  suis, 
"  viz.  fiuinen  maris  ex  parte  australi,  et  terras  Roberti  Schank,  ex  parte  occiden- 
"  tali  ei  boreali,  et  terras  meas  propria'>  ex  parte  orientali."  The  account  of  that 
family  settled  ,n  Fife  is  as  foUoweth  :  Robert  Shank  was  married  to  Isabel  Irvine, 

who  had  a  son  by  her,  John  Shank,  married  to  Kirkaldy  ;  who  had  a 

son  by  her,  Henry  Shank,  married  to  Christian  Melville,  daughter  to  the  Laird  of 
3 


220  APPENDIX. 

Raith,  infeft  and  seised  in  the  year  1442  ;  who  by  her  had  a  son,  Martin  Shank, 
manied  to  Alison  Boswell,  daughter  to  Glassmont  Boswell,  in  the  year  1482  ;  who 
by  her  had  a  son,  Martin  Shank,  married  to  Bessie  Lochore,  and  infeft  anno  1520  ; 
who  had  by  her  a  son,  Henry,  married  to  Bessie  Balfour,  daughter  to  John  Balfour 
of  Ballovv,  in  the  year  1565;  who  had  by  her  a  son,  Henry  Shank,  married  to  Janet 
Cunningham,  daughter  to  Robert  Cunningham  of  Woodlield,  in  the  year  1609; 
who  by  her  had  a  son,  Martin  Shank,  married  to  Christian  Reedie,  daughter 
to  John  Reedie,  shipmaster  in  Burntisland,  anno  1640  ;  who  by  her  had  a  son, 
Henry  Shank,  married  to  Agnes  Balfour,  daughter  to  Alexander  Balfour  in  Bal- 
garvie,  anno  1669,  who  by  her  had  two  sons,  Martin  and  Alexander;  Martin  mar- 
ried to  Margaret  Downie,  daughter  to  Thomas  Downie,  merchant  in  Edinburgh ;  who 
by  her  had  a  son,  Alexander,  who  is  presently  possessed  of  the  lands  mentioned 
in  the  fore-cited  charter,  and  is  married  to  Mary  Burnet,  daughter  to  Mr  Jonn 
Burnet,  late  minister  at  Monymusk  in  Aberdeenshire,  of  the  ancient  and  honour- 
able famdy  of  Leys  Burnet. 

This  gentleman  bears  the  same  arms  that  the  ancient  family  of  Shajik  of  that 
Ilk  bore,  which  by  Sir  David  Lindsay  his  Manuscript  Heraldry  is  gules,  on  a  fesse 
urgent,  a  hawk's  lure  of  the  first,  betwixt  a  cinquefoil  in  chief,  and  a  falcon's  leg 
or  shank,  chased  and  belled  in  base,  of  the  second,  with  helmet  and  mantling  suit- 
able ;  on  a  wreath  of  colours  is  set,  for  his  crest,  an  eagle,  in  a  rising  posture,  of  the 
field  :  motto,  on  an  escrol  above,  the  word  Spero. 

Alexander  Shank.,  Esq.  takes  the  designation  of  Castlerig,  that  being  the  name 
of  those  lands  in  Fife  which  belonged  to  his  ancestors. 


GORDON    OF    GORDONBANK. 


JAMES  GORDON  of  Gordonbank,  in  the  sheriffdom  of  Berwick,  eldest  lawful 
.ion  of  James  Gordon  of  Newtack,  was  second  son  of  John  Gordon  of  Avachie, 
who  was  a  cadet  of  Gordon  of  Straloch,  now  of  Pitlurg,  in  the  shire  of  Aberdeen, 
bears  azure,  on  a  cheveron  betwixt  three  boars'  heads  couped  or,  a  hand  grasping 
a  sheaf  of  arrows,  proper,  all  within  a  bordure  of  the  second,  charged  with  eight 
crescents,  gules ;  crest,  a  dexter  hand  issuing  out  of  a  cloud,  grasping  a  sheaf  of 
arrows  paleways,  all  proper :  niotto,  Legibiu  IS  annis. 


OGILVIE  OF  Barras  in  the  shire  of  Kincardine. 


THE  ancient  progenitors  of  this  family  were  heritors  of  the  lands  of  Balnagarro 
in  Angus,  and  the  first  of  them  seems  to  have  been  a  son  of  Ogilvie,  who  first 
purchased  the  lands  of  Innerquharity,  by  a  charter  of  confirmation,  dated  at  Tam- 
tallan  the  8th  October  1455,  granted  by  George  Earl  of  Angus,  Lord  of  Liddisdale 
and  Jedworth  Forest,  confirming  a  charter  granted  by  Alexander  Lord  Ogilvie  of 
Auchterhouse,  and  Sheriff  of  Angus,  with  consent  of  Walter  Ogilvie  his  brother, 
TO  their  cousin  Andrew  Ogilvie,  brother-german  to  John  Ogilvie  of  Innerquharity, 
of  the  lands  of  Balnagarro  and  Chapelton,  with  the  pertinents,  lying  within  the 
regality  of  Kirrymuir,  and  sheriftdom  of  Forfar,  dated  at  Auchterhouse  the  penult 
day  of  August  1455.  The  lands  now  belong  to  Sir  John  Ogilvie  of  Innerquharity, 
and  these  charters  are  in  his  custody.     This  Andrew  seems  to  have  been  cousin- 


gennaii  to  the  Lord  Aiichterhousc,  and  to  tlie  foresaid   Walter  Ogilvie,  who  was 
the    first   Lord  High  Treasurer  of  Scotland.     See  Crawfurd's   Oilicers  of  State, 

page  537-  , 

And  indeed  they  appear  to  have  been  a  long  time  inheritors  of  that  place  : 
However,  Williuin  Ogilvie,  second  son  to  the  last  Laird  of  Balnagarro  of  that  race, 
whose  mother  was  the  only  daughter  and  child  of  Ogilvie  of  Kallouv,  who  was 
son  to  the  first  Lord  Ogilvie  ;  I  say,  this  William  Ogilvie  married  Katharine 
Strachan,  daughter  to  Strachan  of  Bridgeton  in  Angus,  and  niece  to  Strachan  of 
Thornton  in  Merns,  and  his  eldest  brother  being  dead,  William  came  to  the 
Merns  with  Margaret,  daughter  to  the  Lord  Ogilvie,  who  was  married  to  the  Earl 
Marischal,  to  whom  he  was  a  near  relation  by  his  mother,  and  brought  the  re- 
mains of  the  price  of  the  estate  of  Balnagarro,  which  his  father  sold,  and  laid  ii 
in  the  Earl  Marischal's  hand,  for  which  the  Earl  gave  him  a  wadset-right  upon 
the  lands  of  Lumgair,  about  L.  50  Sterling  of  yearly  rent. 

George  Ogilvie,  his  only  son,  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  to  Mr  John  Douglas 
of  Barras,  by  Jean,  daughter  to  Eraser  of  Dores.  This  Mr  John  was  fourth  law- 
ful son  to  William  the  tenth  Earl  of  Angus,  and  third  of  that  name,  by  Giles,  a 
daughter  of  Sir  Robert  Graham  of  Morphy,  the  said  Earl's  other  three  sons  being 
Wdliam  his  heir,  Sir  Robert  of  Glenbervie  in  the  Merns,  and  Mr  Gavin  of 
Bridgeford,  ancestor  to  the  present  heiresses  thereof.  The  foresaid  Earl  was  son 
of  Su' Archibald  Douglas  of  -  Glenbervie,  and  Agnes,  daughter  to  Robert  Lord 
Keith,  eldest  son  to  William  the  second  Earl  Marischal,  grandchild  to  Sir  Wil- 
liam Douglas  of  Braidwood,  and  Elizabeth,  sole  heiress  of  Sir  James  Auchinleck 
ol  ^iknbervie,  and  great-grandchild  to  Archibald  the  sixth  Earl  of  Angus,  and 
first  of  that  name,  who  was  Chancellor  of  Scotland,  and  commonly  called  Archi- 
hiild  Bell  the  Cat,  and  Elizabeth,  daughter  to  Robert  Lord  Boyd.  George's  con- 
tract of  maniage  is  in  the  custody  of  Sir  William,  his  great-grandchild,  and  bears 
date  the  last  day  of  January  1634.  He  purchased  the  lands  of  Barras  from  the 
eldest  son  and  heir  of  Sir  John  Douglas,  his  brother-in-law,  at  the  earnest  desire  of 
Mr  Douglas's  nearest  relations,  as  appears  by  a  writ  under  their  hands,  in  Sir 
William's  custody. 

■V^iLLiAM  Earl  Marischal,  in  the  time  of  the  usurpation,  being  by  King  Charles 
IL  and  Committee  of  Estates  intrusted  with  the  care  and  keeping  of  the  house 
and  castle  of  Djnotter,  in  which  were  lodged,  among  other  valuable  things,  the 
ancient  monuments  of  the  kingdom  of  Scotland,  viz.  the  crown,  sword,  and 
sceptre,  he  looked  out  for  a  man  of  fidelity,  loyalty,  and  courage,  to  be  governor 
and  lieutenant  of  that  fort,  and  pitched  upon  George,  afterwards  Sir  George 
Ogilvie  of  Barras,  as  a  person  having  these  qualifications,  (in  which  neither  he  nor 
his  prince  were  deceived),  wherefore  he  gave  him  a  commission  for  that  elVect, 
which  bears  date  at  Stirling  the  8th  day  of  July  1651,  and  which  is  subjoined  to 
this  memorial.  No.  i. 

In  the  executing  of  which  commission  he  showed  to  the  world  that  his  fidelity 
and  loyalty  were  impregnable,  and  his  courage  undaunted ;  for  he  looked  with 
great  disdain  and  contempt  upon  the  threatcnings,  and  large  and  fair  promises  of 
the  rebels,  and  kept  out  that  castle  as  long  as  it  was  in  his  power,  and  after  all  the 
other  castles  in  the  kingdom  were  given  up  to  the  Usurper's  army,  as  is  evident 
from  two  letters,  and  a  summons  by  the  commanders  in  chief  of  the  enemy's 
army,  and  the  governor's  answer  to  these  letters,  all  subjoined,  No.  id,  3d,  4th 
and  5th.  The  reason  that  the  governor  said  in  his  answer.  No.  4th,  that  he  had 
his  commission  from  the  king  and  none  else,  probably  was  for  the  safety  of  the 
Earl  Marischal's  person,  and  preservation  of  his  houses;  yet  after  perusing  the 
letters  subjoined.  No.  jtii,  8th,  9th  and  loth,  he  might  be  allowed  to  s.iy,  that 
although  he  had  his  commission  first  from  the  Earl  Marischal,  (who  was  then 
prisoner  to  the  rebels)  he  then  had  it  from  his  majesty.  The  governor  at  last 
would  not  surrender  the  castle  (even  when  he  was  not  able  to  hold  it  out)  but 
upon  honourable  terms,  which  were  made  betwixt  him  and  Colonel  Thomas  Mor- 
gan, who,  with  a  considerable  body  of  the  Usurper's  army,  lay  at  the  Black  Hill 
of  Dunotter  bombarding  and  cannonading  the  castle,  by  order  of  General  Richard 
Dear. 

Vol.  n.  6  R 


;;:  APPENDIX. 

Among  tlie  capitulations  betwixt  tlie  governor  and  Colonel  Morgan,  dated  the 
26th  Mav  1652,  there  was  one,  which  would  appear  inconsistent  with  the  governor's 
character,  to  wit,  that  he  should  deliver  up  to  the  colonel  the  above-mentioned  ho- 
nours of  Scotland,  if  in  the  castle;  and,  if  not,  to  give  a  good  account  of  them. 
Now,  for  the  vindication  of  that  gentleman's  character,  it  will  be  necessary  to  give 
a  short  genuine  account,  what  was  become  of  these  ancient  monuments,  and  liow 
by  a  good  providence  they  were  kept  out  of  the  hands  of  the  rebels  in  the  time 
of  the  usurpation,  and,  after  the  restoration,  delivered  safe  and  entire  to  his  Ma- 
jesty King  Charles  II.;  in  which  account  there  shall  be  nothing  insert  but  what 
is  sufficiently  documented  by  the  original  papers  subjoined. 

Captain  George  Ogilvie  of  Barras,  being  governor  of  the  castle  of  Dunotter, 
us  is  said,  did  carefully  preserve  the  foresaid  regalia,  some  papers  belonging  to  his 
majesty,  the  registers  of  the  church  of  Scotland,  James  1.  Duke  of  Hamilton's 
papers,  and  the  monuments  of  the  University  of  St  Andrews,  and  did  faithfully 
restore  them  all  to  the  ri'ght  owners,  or  others  having  their  commission,  as  appears 
by  the  Earl  Marischal's  receipt  for  the  king's  papers,  subjoined  No.  6th.  Alexan- 
der Lord  Balcarras,  his  receipt  for  the  church  registers,  in  virtue  of  a  power  from 
the  commission  of  the  kirk,  a  letter  from  Anne  Dutchess  of  Hamilton  to  the  go- 
vernor, and  her  servant's  receipt,  and  a  letter  frorn  the  University  of  St  Andrews, 
and  their  servants  receipt ;  all  which  are  registered  in  the  register  of  probative  writs, 
at  Edinburgh  the  6th  of  March  1701. 

The  king's  papers  were,  before  the  surrender  of  the  castle,  packed  and  sewed  up 
in  a  girdle  of  linen  by  the,  governor's  lady,  and  the  same  put  about  the  middle  of 
Anne  Lindsav,  her  relation,  afterwards  wife  to  Doctor  Willocks,  minister  at  Kem- 
noe  in  Aberdeenshire,  and  after  that  manner  conveyed  out  of  the  castle,  and  saved 
from  the  enemy. 

As  to  the  regalia,  the  governor  and  his  lady  preserved  them  with  extraordinary 
care  while  in  the  castle;  but  at  last,  seeing  a  powerful  army  at  the  gates  every 
day  bombarding  the  fortress,  and  having  little  or  no  hopes  of  relief,  notwithstand- 
mg  the  king  had  their  comfortless  circumstances  much  at  heart,  as  appears  by  a 
letter  from  his  majesty,  written  with  his  own  hand,  under  Lieutenant-Geneial 
Middleton's  cover,  delivered  to  the  governor  by  Sir  John  Strachan,  both  w^hich 
letters  are  subjoined.  No.  7th  and  Sth:  They  consulted  betwixt  themselves  how  to  pre- 
serve these  ancient  and  royal  monuments,  in  the  event  that  through  want  of  assistance 
the  castle  should  be  either  taken  or  surrendered.  About  which  time  the  Lord  Bal- 
carras wrote  the  governor  to  deliver  the  honours  to  Sir  Arthur  Forbes,  ancestor  to 
the  Earl  of  Granard  in  Ireland;  and  the  Earl  of  Loudon,  Chancellor,  wrote  him 
likewise  to  get  the  honours  transported  to  some  remote  and  strong  castle  in  the 
Highlands,  conform  to  their  letters  registrate  in  the  register  of  probative  writs,  at 
Edinburgh  the  6th  of  March  1701,  and  hereto  subjoined.  No.  9th  and  loth. 

But  the  governor  not  having  the  trust  from  these  lords,  and  fearing,  that,  in  the 
way  they  proposed  to  carry  off  the  honours,  they  might  fall  into  the  enemy's  hands, 
the  governor  and  his  lady  contrived  and  made  up  a  letter,  as  if  from  the  honour- 
able Mr  John  Keith,  the  Earl  Marischal's  brother,  and  afterwards  Earl  of  Kintore, 
(who  was  then  abroad)  directed  to  the  governor,  and  bearing,  that  he  was  safely 
arrived  at  Rotterdam,  with  the  crown,  sword,  and  sceptre  of  Scotland,  to  be  delivered 
to  his  Majesty  King  Charles  11. ;  which  letter,  if  the  castle  was  either  taken  or  sur- 
rendered, was  to  be  dropped,  in  order  to  fall  into  the  enemy's  hands;  and  the  go- 
vernor and  his  lady  agreed  that  the  regalia  should  be  conveyed  out  of  the  castle  to 
some  private  and  secure  place,  of  which  place  he  was  not  to  know  for  some  time, 
for  fear,  that  in  case  he  fell  into  the  hands  uf  the  rebels,  he  might  by  torture  be 
obliged  to  divulge  the  place :  And  the  way  that  the  governor's  lady  fell  upon  to 
transport  the  regalia  was,  to  cause  Christian  Fletcher,  spouse  to  Mr  James  Grainger, 
minister  at  Kinnessc,  go  to  Stonehive,  the  next  burgh,  and  buy  a  quantity  of  flax, 
which  being  put  on  her  servant's  back,  she  and  her  servant  came  through  the  ene- 
my's camp  just  before  the  siege,  telling,  she  wanted  to  go  into  the  castle  to  speak 
to  ihe  governor's  lady,  which  they  permitted,  and  promised  her  and  her  servant  a 
safe  regress  ;  which  happening,  the  governor's  lady  (without  the  knowledge  of  her 
hu  band)  packed  up  the  crown,  sword,  and  sceptre,  in  the  burden  of  flax,  that  Mrs 
Grainger's  servant  maid  had  carrying  upon  her  back,  and  so  dismissed  them,  with 


APPENDIX.  >2.t 

orders  to  cause  liiJe  iho  icg.ilKi  under  ground,  ia  the  kirk  of  Kiancsse,  but  to  l;;kj 
special  care  that  they  shoukl  be  well  wrapped  up  in  clean  linen,  and  the  same 
frequently  renewed,  because  it  could  not  last  long  under  ground ;  the  value  ct 
which  linen,  and  all  otlier  charges  anent  preserving  of  tiic  regalia,  with  a  suitable 
reward  for  pains,  was  paid  by  the  governor  to  Mr  Grainger  and  his  wife. 

This  was  a  very  great  trust  by  the  governor's  lady  to  Mrs  Grainger,  and  most  faith- 
fully executed  by  that  worthy  gentlewoman,  and  her  worthy  and  reverend  husband 
the  minister  of  Kinnesse  ;  within  which  parish  the  governor  had  an  estate,  and  hi.s 
manor-house,  whereby  his  lady  had  good  opportunity  to  know  that  the  minister 
and  his  wife  were  persons  deserving  of  trust,  otherwise,  let  the  event  be  what  it 
will,  she  could  not  have  answered  to  have  given  them  such  a  trust. 

Soon  after,  the  governor  was  necessitated  to  surrender  the  castle  to  the  Usurper's 
army,  as  is  said,  wlio  looked  upon  their  getting  into  their  custody  the  honours  of 
our  ancient  kingdom,  a  much  greater  advantage  than  the  possession  of  tliac  house, 
and,  upon  their  disappointment,  would  of  consequence  be  much  chagrined. 
Short  time  after  the  surrender  of  the  castle  the  above  letter  fell  into  the  enemy'.^ 
hands,  which  was  tliought  would  contribute  to  the  preservation  of  tlie  royal  me- 
nu.nents,  and  to  the  peace  and  safety  of  the  governor,  his  lady,  and  family. 

But  when  the  Usurper's  officers  had  searched  tlie  castle,  and  did  not  find  the  re- 
galia, they  were  much  more  out  of  humour  than  before  they  had  got  the  possession 
of  that  fortress ;  and  so  it  appeared  by  their  treatment  of  the  governor  and  his 
lady,  which  was  the  cause  of  the  death  of  the  last. 

They  required  the  governor,  upon  his  word  of  honour,  to  perform  that  article  of 
capitulation,  at  the  surrender,  of  delivering  up  the  regalia,  or  to  give  a  good  ac- 
count of  the  same ;  and  he,  without  breach  of  honour,  told,  that  he  did  not  know 
where  they  were,  but  had  seen  a  letter,  bearing,  they  were  carried  abroad  to  his 
Majesty  King  Charles  II.  to  which  they  gave  no  credit.  Thereafter  they  exa- 
mined his  lady,  who  asserted  they  were  carried  abroad  to  the  king,  to  which  thcv 
gave  as  little  trust;  so  their  next  course  was,  at  one  time,  to  threaten  the  governor 
and  his  lady  with  torture,  and,  at  another  time,  to  promise  them  large  rewards;  to 
give  an  account  of  the  honours ;  neither  of  which  were  prevailing  arguments  with 
tuch  loyal  and  worthy  persons. 

After  which  the  governor's  estate  was  sequestrated,  and  he  and  his  lady  both 
confined  prisoners  to  a  room  in  the  castle  for  the  space  of  a  whole  year ;  during 
which  time  they  v.-ere  not  allowed  the  use  of  a  servant,  but  treated  with  the  hardest 
usage,  until  the  loth  of  January  1653,  that  Sir  Robert  Graham  of  Worphy  gave  a  , 
bond  to  present  the  said  Captain  George  Ogilvie  and  his  lady,  true  prisoners  to  the 
then  governor  of  Dunotter,  when  called  for,  under  the  failzie  of  L.  2000  Sterling, 
by  which  they  were  obliged  not  to  go  above  three  miles  from  their  own  house: 
At  last,  upon  James  Anderson  of  Uras  giving  a  bond  for  L.  502  Sterling  more, 
tiiey  were  allowed  six  \''eeks  to  go  about  their  lawful  business;  the  governor,  after 
his  lady  had  told  him  that  she  had  trusted  the  honours  to  Mr  Grainger  and  hi^ 
wife,  it  seems,  became  suspicious,  and  wrote  a  letter  to  Mr  Grainger,  which  oc- 
casioned the  honest  minister,  in  vindication  of  his  fidelity,  to  write  the  answer  sub- 
joined, No.  nth. 

And  according  to  it  the  governor  came  and  took  home  with  him  the  sceptre; 
but,  it  seems,  gave  a  receipt  for  the  whole,  and  took  Mr  Grainger's  obligation  to 
to  deliver  the  crown  and  sword  upon  demand,  which  is  subjoined  No,  12th. 

Whether  the  minister  was  afraid  to  be  baulked  of  his  reward,  or  if  any  other 
was  insisting  to  have  these  jewels,  to  whom  he  might  produce  the  governor's  re- 
ceipt, is  unknown. 

After  the  Restoration  he  sent  up  his  son,  the  late  Sir  William  Ogilvie  of  Bar- 
ras,  to  London,  to  get  his  majesty's  directions  what  to  do  with  the  regalia,  who 
gave  in  to  his  majesty  a  petition  to  that  effect,  and  was  ordained  to  deliver  them  to 
the  Earl  Marischal  of  Scotland;  which  petition  and  deliverance  are  subjoined 
No.  13th.  How*  soon  this  order  came  to  Captain  George  Ogilvie,  the  late  go- 
vernor's hands,  he  delivered  up  the  regalia,  to  wit,  crown,  sword,  and  sceptre,  to 
William  Earl  Marischal,  entire,  complete,  and  in  the  same  condition  that  he  had 
received  them  from  his  Lordship,  conform  to  the  Earl's  holograph  receipt  subjoined 
No.  14th. 


124 


APPENDIX. 


As  Captain  George  Ogilvie  and  his  lady  had  acted  a  very  dutiful  and  loyal  part 
in  preserving  of  the  honours,  for  about  the  space  of  eight  years,  and  thereby  suf- 
fered not  only  great  hardships  in  their  persons,  but  also  a  great  loss  of  their  means, 
they  were  not  altogether  left  unrewarded  by  his  majesty,  who,  by  patent  dated  5th 
March  1661,  made  Captain  George  Ogilvie  a  knight  baronet,  and  gave  warrant  to 
the  Lord  Lyon  to  matriculate  his  coat  of  arms  in  the  Lyon  Register,  conform  to 
the  blazon  underwritten:  In  which,  for  his  signal  service  to  the  king  and  country, 
he  is  allowed  to  bear  a  crowned  thistle,  the  royal  badge  of  Scotland,  and  got  for 
his  motto,  Praclarum  regi  Si"  regno  servitium.  His  armorial  bearing  is  blazoned 
thus,  argent,  a  lion  passant  gnrdant  gules,  crowned  with  an  imperial  crown,  and 
gorged  with  an  open  one,  both  proper,  holding  in  his  dexter  paw  a  sword,  proper, 
defending  a  thistle  vert,  (in  the  dexter  chief)  ensigned  with  a  crown  or,  with  the 
badge  of  knight  baronet,  by  way  of  canton  in  the  sinister  chief;  crest,  a  demi-man 
armed  at  all  points,  proper,  holding  forth  his  right  hand;  and  on  an  escrol  the 
foresaid  motto. 

His  majesty  likewise,  by  a  charter  dated  3d  March  1662,  granted  by  him  in 
favour  of  the  said  Sir  George  Ogilvie  upon  the  lands  of  Barras,  changed  the 
holding  of  the  said  lands  from  ward  to  blench;  which  charter  is  ratified  in  Parlia- 
ment the  nth  of  August  1679,  in  which  patent,  charter,  and  ratification.  Sir 
George's  services  above-mentioned  are  specified  as  the  onerous  causes;  to  whom 
succeeded  his  only  child, 

Sir  William  Ogilvie,  v.ho  was  three  times  married  ;  first,  to  Margaret,  daughter 
to  Forbes  of  Leslie,  and  relict  to  Turing  of  Foveran,  both  in  the  shire  of  Aber- 
deen ;  secondly,  to  Marjory,  daughter  to  Rait  of  Halgreen,  by  whom  he  had  one 
daughter,  Margaret,  married  to  Ogilvie  of  Pilmuir;  thirdly,  to  Isabel,  daughter  to 
Sir  John  Ogilvie  of  Innerquharity,  baronet,  by  whom  he  had  David,  his  heir,  Mr 
William,  Helen,  and  Jean  Ogilvies:  Mr  William  married  Mary,  daughter  and 
heiress  of  Gordon  of  Braichly,  and  relict  of  Mr  Isaac  FuUarton,  advocate,  by  whom 
he  has  one  daughter,  named  Margaret;  Helen  married  Lindsay  of  Pitscandly;  and 
Jean  was  Lady  Carsbank. 

Sir  David  Ogilvie  was  three  times  married;  first,  to  Susanna,  daughter  to  Scott 
of  Benholm,  by  whom  he  had  the  present  Sir  William,  and  a  daughter  named 
Katharine,  married  to  Hercules  Taylor,  younger  of  Burrowfield,  in  Angus;  se- 
condly, to  Jean,  daughter  to  George  Ross  of  Clochan  of  Aberdeen,  merchant,  by 
whom  he  had  three  daughters,  Isabel,  Elizabeth,  married  to  Peter  Anderson  of 
Bourtie  in  Aberdeen,  there,  and  Mary;  thirdly,  to  Anne,  daughter  and  co-heiress 
to  Mr  John  Guthrie  of  Westhall,  a  cadet  of  Guthrie  of  that  Ilk,  by  whom  he 
had  five  children,  David,  James,  Anne,  Margaret,  and  Susanna.  His  eldest  son 
and  heir. 

Sir  William  Ogilvie,  has  been  twice  married ;  first,  to  Elizabeth,  daughter  to 
Barclay  of  Urie,  by  whom  he  had  two  sons,  David  and  John ;  and  his  present  lady 
is  Anna,  daughter  to  the  above  Mr  Isaac  Fullarton,  by  whom  he  has  akeady  three 
daughters,  Mary,  Susanna,  and  IsabeL 


No.   I.     Commission  William  Earl  Mariscral  to  George  Ogllvie  of  Barras,  to  be 
Governor  of  Dunotter  Castle. 


Forasmuch  as  the  King's  Majesty  and  Committee  of  Estates  have  entrusted  the  care 
and  keeping  of  the  house  and  castle  of  Dunotter  to  us  William  Earl  Marischal, 
and  have  allowed  forty  men,  a  lieutenant,  and  two  Serjeants,  to  be  entertained 
within  it,  upon  the  public  charge;  therefore,  we  do  hereby  nominate  George  Ogil- 
vie of  Barras  to  be  our  lieutenant  for  keeping  of  the  said  house,  and  gives  unto 
him  the  sole  and  full  power  of  the  command  thereof,  and  of  the  men  that  are  to  be 
entertained  therein  for  keeping  thereof,  under  us,  with  power  to  him  to  bruik,  en- 
joy, and  exerce  the  said  place,  with  all  fees,  dues,  and  allowances  belonging  thereto, 


APPENDIX.  225 

as  fully,  in  all  respects,  as  any  other  lieutenant  in  such  a  case  may  do.     In  witness 
whereof,  we  have  subscribed  thir  presents  at  Stirhng  the  8tli  July  1751. 

Marischall. 

Archibald  Primrose,  witness. 

William  Keith,  witness. 

Alexander  Lindsay,  witness. 


No.  2.     Overton's  Letter  to  the  Governor. 

Gentlemen, 
I  HAVE  power  to  demolish  your  own,  and  the  remainder  of  my  Lord  Marischall's 
houses  in  thir  parts,  except  you  timeously  prevent  the  same,  by  giving  up  the 
castle  of  Dunnottar  to  the  use  of  the  state  of  England,  upon  such  terms  as  other 
gentlemen  of  honour  have  heretofore  (when  the  forces  of  this  nation  were  more 
significant)  accepted.  You  may  observe  this  season,  which  the  most  significant 
persons  of  your  nation  close  with,  by  putting  their  persons  and  estates  under  our 
protection:  You  may  likewise  consider  how  imprudent,  at  least  improvident,  a 
part  It  may  be  reputed  in  a  time  of  pacification,  for  your  arms  to  be  the  only  an- 
tagonists to  an  army,  whose  arms  God  Almiglity  hath  hitherto  made  successful 
against  your  most  considerable  citadel ;  I  dare  not  promise  you  the  hke  oppor- 
tunity for  good  terms  in  future  to  come  off  upon,  as  is  ready  upon  speedy  capitula- 
tion at  present  to  perform,  who  rests. 

Your  humble  servant, 

R.  Overton. 
Stonhyve,  Novem.  %th  1651. 

Directed,  To  the  Honourable  Governor 
of  Dunnottar  Castle,  and  to  the  rest 
of  the  Gentlemen  there. 


No.  3.     Button's  Letter  to  the  Governor. 

Honoured  Sir, 
Whereas  you  keep  Dunnottar  Castle  for  the  use  of  your  king ;  which  castle 
doth  belong  to  the  Lord  Marischall,  who  is  now  prisoner  to  our  Parliament  of 
England  ;  these  are  to  advise  and  require  you,  in  their  names,  to  surrender  the 
said  castle  to  me  for  their  use  ;  and  I  do  assure  you,  by  the  word  of  a  gentleman, 
that  you  shall  have  very  honourable  and  soldier-like  conditions  :  If  you  refuse  this 
offer,  then,  if  any  thing  shall  happen  to  you,  contrary  to  your  expectations,  by 
the  violence  of  our  soldiers,  blame  yourself  and  not  me;  for  I  may  tell  you,  that 
the  Lord  hath  been  pleased  to  dehver  unto  us  many  stronger  places  by  storm  than 
that  is,  since  our  unhappy  difference  hath  been,  and  I  doubt  not  but  the  same 
God  will  stand  by  us  in  our  attempts  in  this.  I  desire  your  speedy  answer,  and 
shall  rest, 

Sir, 

Y'our  very  humble  servant, 

Tiio.  Dutton.. 
Stonhyve,  Novem.  nth  1651. 


Directed  thus,  For  the   Commander 
in  Chief  of  Dunnottar  Castle,  these 


No.  4.     The  Governor's  Letter  to  Dutton,  in  answer  to  the  above  two  Letters. 

Honoured  Sir, 
Whereas  you   \m  I'e  that  I  keep  the  Castle  of  Dunnottar  for  the   use  of  the 
king's  majesty,  which  house,  as  you  say,  doth  belong  to  the  Earl  Marischall,  you 
Vol.  n.  6  S 


226  APPENDIX. 

shall  know  that  I  have  my  comtnission  absolutely  from  his  majesty,  and  none  else ; 
neither  will  I  acknowledge  any  man's  interest  here,  and  intends,  by  the  assistance 
of  God,  to  maintain  the  same  for  his  majesty's  service  upon  all  hazard  whatsom- 
ever.  I  hope  you  have  that  much  gallantry  in  you  as  not  to  wrong  my  Lord 
Marischall  his  lands,  seeing  he  is  a  prisoner  himself  for  the  present :  Whereas  you 
have  had  success  in  former  times,  I  attribute  it  to  the  wrath  of  God  against  us  for 
our  sins,  and  to  the  unfaithfulness  of  those  men  who  did  maintain  the  same,  none 
whereof  you  shall  find  here,  by  the  Lord's  grace,  to  whom  I  commit  myself. 

And  am.  Sir, 

Your  very  humble  servant, 

George  Ogilvie. 
Dunnottar,  Nov.  22.  1651. 

No.  5.     Lambert's  Summons  to  the  Governor. 

Sir, 
Being  desirous  to  avoid  the  effusion  of  blood,  and  the  destroying  of  the  country, 
r  have  thought  fit  to  send  you  this  summons  to  surrender  up  the  castle,  with  the 
provisions  of  war  thereto  belonging,  in  my  hands,  for  the  use  of  the  Parliament  of 
the  commonwealth  of  England.  If  you  shall  hearken  hereto  with  speed  you  shall 
have  conditions  for  yourself,  and  the  soldiers  under  your  command,  as  may  befit  a 
roan  of  honour,  and  one  in  your  condition.     I  expect  your  speedy  answer. 

And  am.  Sir, 

Your  servant, 

Lambert. 
Dundee,  "Jan.  3d  1652. 

Directed,  For  the  Governor  of  Dunnottar  Castle. 


NTo.  6.     Receipt  Karl  Marischal  to  the  Governor  of  Dunotter,  for  the  King's 
Papers. 


We  William  Earl  Marischal  grants  us  to  have  received  from  George  Ogilvie, 
sometime  governor  of  Dunnottar,  some  papers  belonging  to  the  king's  majesty, 
which  were  in  the  Castle  of  Dunnottar  the  time  of  his  being  governor  there,  in 
two  little  coffers ;  which  papers,  consisting  to  the  number  of  eight  score  sixteen 
several  pieces,  whereof  there  are  four  packets  sealed,  and  one  broke  open  :  Of 
which  papers  I  grant  the  receipt,  and  obliges  me  to  warrant  the  said  George  at  his 
majesty's  hands,  and  all  others  whatsomever,  by  this  my  warrant,  signed,  sealed, 
and  subscribed  at  London  the  first  day  of  December  1655. 

Marischall. 


No.  7.     The  King's  Letter  to  the  Governor,  ^i 


Gentlemen, 
Assure  yourselves  I  am  very  careful  of  you,  and  sensible  of  your  affections  to 
me.  Give  credit  to  what  this  bearer  shall  say  to  you,  and  observe  any  directions 
you  shall  receive  from  Lieutenant  General  Middleton  :  You  shall  shortly  hear  from 
me  again,  and  I  would  have  you  find  some  way  frequently  to  advertise  me  of  your 
condition,  which  I  shall  take  all  possible  care  to  reheve. 

Charles  R. 
Paris,  0.6th  March  1652. 


APPENDIX.  227 


No.  8.    General  Middleton's  Letter  to  the  Governor. 

My  Dear  Friend, 
I  AM  SO  overjoyed  that  you  in  this  time  do  behave  yourself  so  gallantly,  that  I 
shall  be  most  desirous  to  do  you  service :  The  particulars  I  remit  to  the  bearer, 
my  cousin  and  yours,  to  whom  give  trust,  since  he  is  particularly  instructed  from 
him,  who  shall  rather  perish  than  be  wanting  to  his  friend,  and  v?ho  in  all  condi- 
tions is,  and  shall  be  yours, 

J.  M. 


No.  g.     Lord  Balcarras's  Letter  to  the  Governor. 

Sir, 
You  are  now,  I  believe,  hardly  in  expectation  of  relief;  and  ye  know  how  much 
it  concerns  not  only  the  kingdom,  but  yourself  in  particular,  that  the  honours  be 
secured.  I  shall  therefore  again  desire  you,  by  virtue  of  the  first  warrant  which 
you  saw,  and  of  this  likewise  which  I  have  lately  received,  and  now  send  you  in- 
closed, that  you  deliver  them  immediately  to  the  bearer  Sir  Arthur  Forbes,  whose 
receipt  of  them,  under  his  hand,  I  do  hereby  declare  shall  be  as  valid  for  your  ac- 
quittal and  liberation,  as  if  you  had  it  under  the  hand  of  your  atfectionate  friend 
to  serve  you, 

Balcarras. 
Duffies,  nth  October  1651. 

Postscript,  I  shall  not  now  repeat  the  arguments  I  used  to  you  at  Dunnottar; 
if  they  were  strong  then,  I  am  sure  they  are  much  more  now,  for  the 
condition  of  business  is  much  altered  since.  I  say  no  more,  but  remem- 
ber what  1  then  spoke  to  you  as  your  friend. 

Directed,  For  tlie  Governor  of  Dunnottar. 

No.  10.     The  Chancellor's  Letter  to  the  Governor. 

Sir, 
Your  letter  of  the  last  of  October  came  to  my  hand  upon  the  9th  of  Novem 
ber  instant ;  and  the  ParUament  being  appointed  to  meet  here  upon  the  12th  day, 
I  stayed  the  bearer,  in  expectation  that  I  might  return  you  the  Parliament's  an- 
swer and  orders ;  but  the  Parliament  not  havmg  met,  and  there  being  no  meeting 
of  the  Committee  of  Estates,  I  can  give  you  no  positive  advice  nor  order  ;  but  1 
conceive,  that  the  trust  committed  to  you,  and  the  safe  custody  of  these  things 
under  your  charge,  did  require,  that  victual,  a  competent  number  of  honest  and 
stout  soldiers,  and  all  other  necessaries,  should  have  been  provided,  and  put  in  the 
castle,  before  you  had  been  in  any  hazard ;  and  if  you  be  in  good  condition,  or 
that  you  can  timely  supply  yom'self  with  all  necessaries,  and  that  the  place  be 
tenable  against  all  attempts  of  the  enemy,  I  doubt  not  but  you  will  hold  out ;  but 
if  you  want  provisions,  soldiers,  and  ammunition,  and  cannot  hold  out  all  the  as- 
saults of  the  enemy,  which  is  feared,  and  thought  you  cannot  do,  if  you  be  hardly 
pursued,  I  know  no  better  expedient  than  that  the  honours  of  the  crown  be  speedi- 
ly and  safely  transported  to  some  remote  and  strong  castle  or  hold  in  the  High- 
lands ;  and  I  wish  you  had  delivered  them  to  the  Lord  Balcarras,  as  was  desired  by 
the  Committee  of  Estates,  nor  do  I  know  of  any  better  way  for  preservation  of  these 
things,  and  your  exoneration;  and  it  will  be  an  irreparable  loss  and  shame  if  these 
things  shall  be  taken  by  the  enemy,  and  very  dishonourable  for  yourself.  I  have 
herewith  returned  your  letter  to  the  Lord  Balcarras,  hearing  he  is  still  in  the  north, 
and  not  to  come  to  this  country.  I  have  written  to  Sir  John  Smith  to  furnish  you 
the  remainder  of  the  victual  you  wrote  he  should  b^ve  given  you  ;  if  he  be  in  the 
north  you  will  send  it  to  him,  but  if  he  be  gone  home  to  Edinburgh,  I  cannot  help  u  ', 


228  APPENDIX. 

so  having  given  voli  the  best  advice  I  can  at  present,  I  trust  you  will,  with  all  care 
and  faithfulness,  be  answerable,  according  to  the  trust  committed  to  you,  and  I 
shall  still  remain 

Your  very  assured. 


and  real  friend. 


Loudon,  Cancellarius. 


Finlarge,  Novem.  i^th  1651. 

Directed  thus,  For  my  much  respected  friend, 
George  Ogilvie,  Governor  of  Dunnottar. 

No.  II.     Mr  James  Grainger's  Letter  to  the  Governor. 

Sir, 
I  HAVE  received  yours,  and  before  it  came  to  my  hand,  I  had  secured  the  things 
you  know  of,  upon  the  night  time,  and  am  persuaded,  though  any  army  should 
come  they  could  not  be  the  better;  so  that  there  needs  no  fear:  As  for  myself, 
my  neck  shall  break,  and  my  life  go  for  it,  before  1  fail  to  you  ;  yet  some  little 
difficulty  makes  me  loth  they  should  be  transported  as  yet,  vvhilk  shall  be  fully 
made  known  to  you  at  meeting,  whilk,  1  desire,  shall  be  on  Monday  once  a  day; 
and  if  you  be  loth  to  come  here,  send  me  word  and  I  shall  come  to  you :  But,  for 
the  business  itself,  fear  no  more  nor  if  they  were  in  your  house  presently ;  tor  I 
trust  he  who  hath  preserved  them  in  my  custody  till  this  day  will  preserve  them 
in  safety  till  they  go  as  ye  yourself  desires ;  so,  till  meeting,  I  continue 

Your  real  and  true 

Friend  and  servant, 
,  J.  Grainger, 

Kinnesse^  July  zist  1C60. 

To  his  honoured  and  loving  friend, 
the  Laird  of  Barras  elder. 


No.  12.     Mr  James  Grainger's  Obligation  to  the  Governor. 

Whereas  1  have  received  a  discharge  from  George  Ogilvie  of  Barras,  of  the  ho- 
nours of  this  kingdom,  and  he  hath  got  no  more  but  the  sceptre  ;  therefore  I 
obHge  myself,  that  the  rest,  viz.  the  crown  and  sword,  shall  be  forthcoming  at  de- 
mand, by  this  my  ticket,  written  and  subscribed  this  same  day.  I  received  the 
discharge  the  28th  September  1C60. 

J.  Grainger. 

Mo.  13.    Petition  by  the  Goveriior's  Son  to  the  King,  with  his  Majesty's  Deliverance 
thereon,  anent  the  Regalia. 

TO  THE  King's  most  excellent  Majesty, 

The  Humble  Petition  of  William  Ogilvie,  Son  to  George  Ogilvie  of  Barras,. 

Sheweth, 
That  whereas  your  petitioner  is  sent  up  here  by  his  father,  to  give  your  ma- 
jesty notice,  that  his  said  father  hath  had,  and  still  preserves  the  crown,  sword, 
and  sceptre  of  Scotland  in  his  custody,  long  before  the  English  possessed  the  castle 
of  Dunottar,  with  great  hazard  of  his  life,  and  long  and  strait  imprisonment,  which, 
occasioned  the  death  of  his  wife :  and  in  respect  of  your  petitioner's   father  his 


APPENDIX.  229 

great  interest  with  these  honours,  he  could  not  desert  that  great  charge  to  come 
here  and  attend  your  Majesty  himself. 

Wherefore  he  hath  sent  your  petitioner  to  have  your  Majesty's  particular 
order,  in  relation  to  the  foresaid  honours. 

Whitehall,  September  i%th  1660. 
**  His  Majesty  ordains  the  petitioner's  father,  to  deliver  his  crown,  sceptre,  and 
"  sword  to  the  Earl  of  Marischal  of  Scotland,  and  get  his  receipt  of  them. 

"  Lauderdale." 


No.  14..    The  Earl  Marischal's  Receipt  for  the  Regalia. 

At  Dunnottar  the  8th  day  of  October  1660,  I  William  Earl  Marischal  grants 
me  to  have  received  from  George  Ogilvie  of  Barras,  the  crown,  sword,  and  sceptre, 
the  ancient  monuments  of  this  kingdom,  entire  and  compleat,  in  the  same  condi- 
tion they  were  entrusted  by  me  to  him,  and  discharges  the  foresaid  George  Ogil- 
vie of  his  receipt  thereof,  by  this  my  subscription,  day  and  place  foresaid. 

Marischali.. 


Of  the  family  of  CALDER. 


THE  destruction  of  our  ancient  records  has  not  only  been  an  irretrievable  loss 
to  the  nation  in  general,  but  also  to  many  particular  families  :  the  memory  of 
many  heroic  achievements  performed  in  service  of  the  country,  and  of  many  no- 
ble famihes  who  deserved  well  of  it,  are  thereby  buried  in  oblivion,  while  the  rise 
and  origin  of  many  great  and  powerful  families  is  either  wholly  left  in  the  dark, 
or,  at  least,  rendered  doubtful  and  uncertain  :  It  is  for  this  reason,  and  some  others 
which  shall  be  hereafter  noticed,  that  the  family  of  Calder,  though  anciently 
dignified  with  the  highest  titles  of  honour  then  in  use  in  this  kingdom,  and  still  in 
an  opulent  and  flourishing  condition,  are  not  able  to  trace  themselves  back  to  their 
first  original,  nor  condescend  upon  their  founder. 

The  first  account  history  gives  of  the  Thanes  of  Calder  is  about  the  year  1047, 
during  the  usurpation  of  Macbeth :  Amongst  several  nobles  v/ho  became  victims  to 
the  cruelty  and  avarice  of  that  tyrant,  Buchanan  enumerates  the  Thane  of  Nairn, 
whom  Boetius  and  Holinshed  design  Thane  of  Calder.  This  mistake  of  Buchan- 
an, (who  perhaps  took  too  much  upon  trust)  has  probably  been  occasioned  by  rea- 
son of  the  vicinity  of  the  chief  seat  of  the  family  of  Calder  to  the  town  of  Nairn, 
a  considerable  part  of  their  estate  lying  within  that  county ;  but  there  is  great  rea- 
son to  believe  that  the  family  had  been  of  a  considerable  standing  previous  to  that 
period,  and  before  they  attained  to  that  degree  of  grandeur  and  honour  they  are 
then  represented  to  have  been  placed  in. 

The  next  Thane  of  Calder  we  find  on  record  is  Hugo  de  Cadella,  who  was  very 
instrumental  in  the  restoration  of  King  Malcolm  Caiimore,  and  liberally  rewarded 
by  that  generous  prince  {a);  but  it  is  not  evident  what  relation  he  was  to  the  for- 
mer Thane :  however,  there  is  good  reaNon  to  believe  that  it  was  very  near,  and 
it  is  highly  probable  he  was  his  son.  We  are  assured,  that,  amongst  other  acts  of 
gratitude  and  justice.  King  Malcolm  restored  the  posterity  of  such  as  had  suffered 
by  the  tyrant's  cruelty  to  their  predecessors'  estates,  from  the  names  of  which  many 
ancient  families,  among  whom  that  of  Calder  assumed  their  surnames  (6),  a  custom 

(a)  Home's  history  of  the  family  of  Douglas.      {b)  Buchanan,  Dr  Abercromby. 

Vol.  n.  6  T 


230  APPENDIX. 

then  introduced  by  that  wise  and  pohtic  prince,  with  a  view  to  put  an  end  to  tlie 
violent  feuds  that  then  raged  in  the  country. 

To  this  Hugh  succeeded  his  son  Gilbertus  tie  Cadella,  who  in  the  year  1104  got 
a  charter  from  King  Edgar  of  the  lands  of  Calder,  Stc.  which  is  said  to  be  still  ex- 
tant in  the  Lawyers'  Library  at  Edinburgh.     He  was  succeeded  by 

Alexander,  his  son,  who  discovered  a  conspiracy  of  the  Macdonalds,  Murrays, 
and  Cumings,  to  assasinate  King  Alexander  I.  at  Bell-Edgar,  in  his  expedition  to  the 
North  (c);  for  which  good  service,  this  prince,  on  his  return,  confirmed  to  him  the 
thanedom  of  Calder,  Stc.  in  the  11 12.  • 

After  this  Alexander  there  is  nothing  found  on  record  concerning  the  family  of 
Calder  for  three  generations;  only  in  the  year  1230,  Helen,  daughter  to  the  family 
of  Calder,  was  married  to  Schaw  Macintosh  of  that  Ilk  (d). 

In  the  year  1260  mention  is  made  of  Dovendalus,  or  Donald,  Thane  of  Calder, 
who  is  said  to  have  valued  the  barony  of  Geddes  at  L. 24  Scots  per  annum,  and 
that  of  Kilravock  at  L.  12  Scots,  from  which  some  judgment  may  be  formed  of 
the  value  of  lands  at  that  time.     He  was  succeeded  by  his  son 

William,  whose  daughter  Finvola  was  married  to  William  Macintosh  of  that 
Ilk,  and  he  was  succeeded  by  his  son 

Thomas,  who  adhered  to  the  interest  of  King  David  Bruce,  against  Edward  Ba- 
liol ;  and  for  his  fidelity  and  good  services  to  that  prince  was  knighted  by  him ; 
and  was  slain  in  battle  fighting  against  the  Cumings,  who  sided  with  Bahol  about 
the  year  1350  (f).  He  left  behind  him  a  daughter,  Jean,  who  was  married  to  Hugh 
Eraser,  Land  of  Lovat,  and  a  son  who  succeeded  him. 

William,  Thane  of  Calder,  who  was  murdered  by  Sir  Alexander  Rait  of  that 
Ilk  about  the  year  1380,  and  the  lands  of  Rait  were  given  to  the  Thane  of  Calder's 
heir  in  consideration  of  his  father's  murder. 

William  succeeded  his  father,  concerning  whom  we  have  nothing  memorable. 
There  is  yet  extant  a  charter  anent  settling  the  marches  of  their  lands  betwixt  him 
and  Hutcheon  Rose  of  Kilravock,  dated  the  29th  December  1408.  He  was  suc- 
ceeded by  his  son 

Donald,  who,  in  anno  1430,  obtained  a  charter  of  confirmation  of  the  thane- 
dom of  Calder,  and  heritable  sheriffship  of  the  shire  of  Nairn,  from  king  James  I.(/), 
and  enlarged  his  former  estate  by  several  new  acquisitions.  He  had  two  sons,  Wil- 
liam and  Hutcheon,  or  Hugh;  Hutcheon  attended  Alexander  Earl  of  Huntly  in  his 
expedition  against  the  Earls  of  Crawford  and  Douglas,  then  in  rebellion  against  the 
king;  and  Huntly  having  routed  the  forces  of  these  two  Earls  at  the  battle  of  Bre- 
chin, anno  1452,  Hutcheon,  being  too  eager  in  the  pursuit,  was  taken  prisoner  by 
the  enemy,  and  brought  to  Finhaven,  whither  Crawford  had  fled;  but  he  being 
alarmed,  while  at  supper,  with  the  news  of  Huntly's  being  at  hand  in  pursuit  of 
him,  fled  with  such  precipitation,  that,  among  several  other  prisoners  who  made 
their  escape,  Hutcheon  was  one,  and  carried  off"  the  silver  cup  out  of  which  Craw- 
ford drank,  which  he  presented  to  Huntly  at  Brechin  as  a  sure  evidence  of  Craw- 
ford's flight ;  for  which  service  Huntly,  upon  his  return  home,  gave  him  the  lands 
of  Asswanly,  and  George  Duke  of  Gordon  gave  to  his  successor  a  massy  silver 
cup  gilded,  whereon  the  history  of  this  action  is  engraven  to  preserve  the  remem- 
brance of  it  (^).  From  this  Hutcheon  is  descended  the  family  of  Muirton,  the 
present  Sir  Thomas  Calder  of  Muirton  being  a  great-grandchild  of  the  family  of 
Calder  of  Asswanly  *. 

(r)  MSS.  History  of  the  family  of  Macintosh,  {d)  MSS.  History  of  Kilravock's  family,  (f)  Boe- 
•ius.     (f)  Chatta  penes  D.  de  Calder.     {g)  History  of  the  family  of  Gordon. 

*  "  Sir  Thomas  Calder  of  Muirton  is  a  great-grandchild  of  the  family  of  Calder  of  Asswanly,  but 
"  the  Calders  of  Asswanly  are  not  descended  from  Hutcheon,  second  son  of  Donald  Thane  of  Calder,  nor 
'-  has  the  grant  of  the  lands  of  Asswanly  any  reference-  to  the  battle  of  Brechin,  which  was  fought  on 
"  the  1 8th  May  1452,  twelve  years  subsequent  to  the  date  of  the  grant  of  the  foresaid  lands  of  Asswanly, 
"  as  appears  by  a  Charter  of  Confirmation  from  the  ting,  dated  at  Edinburgh  8th  July  1450,  of  the  grant 
"  of  the  lands  of  Asswanly,  by  Sir  Alexander  Setonne,  to  Hugh  Calder,  son  and  heir  of  Alexander  Calder, 
"  and  to  his  spouse  Elizabeth  Gordonne,  dated  at  Elgin  the  last  day  of  August  1440. 

'•  Witnesses  thereto,  George  Earl  of  Avendale,  Sir  George  Crichton  of  Blackness,  Sir  George  Haiiburton, 
"  Joha  Dunbar,  Alexander  Dunbar,  and  John  Stewart,  Alexander  Bannerman  and  Patrick  Calder,  Shield- 


APPENDIX.  23  r 

The  before  named  Donald  Thane  of  Calder  was  succeeded  by  his  eldest  son 
William  ;  in  a  charter  of  confirmation  granted  by  Alexander  Earl  of  Ross  to  Sir 
Walter  Innes,  of  the  lands  of  Aberkerder,  dated  22d  February  1438,  he  is  a  wit- 
ness, and  is  designed  flllliehnus  de  Calder,  his  father  being  then  alive  in  anno  1450; 
he  went  with  William  Earl  of  Douglas  to  the  Jubilee  at  Rome  {u).  He  had  three 
sons,  John,  William,  and  Alexander,  the  last  of  whom,  or  another  brother,  whose 
name  is  not  handed  down,  went,  with  several  other  Scots  gentlemen,  to  assist  Charles 
VII.  of  France  against  the  English;  and  from  him  is  descended  the  family  of  i)if/« 
Campagiia  in  Thoulouse  in  France  (A). 

To  the  said  William  succeeded  his  eldest  son  John,  who  died  without  issue,  and 
was  succeeded  by  his  brother 

William,  who  was  the  last  Thane  in  Scotland,  that  title  having  fallen  into  desue- 
tude, through  introducing  the  new  title  of  Earl,  which  is  said  to  have  come  in 
place  thereof;  however  he  obtained  the  thanedom  and  other  lands  belonging  to  him 
erected  into  a  fee  barony  in  the  1476,  and  declared  to  lie  within  the  shire  ot 
Nairn,  notwithstanding  they  lay  in  diiferent  shires  (r).  He  married  Marjory  Suther- 
land, daughter  to  the  Earl  of  Sutherland,  by  whom  he  had  issue,  AVilliam,  his  eldest 
son,  John,  Alexander,  and  Hutcheon,  and  a  daughter,  Elizabeth,  married  to  Evan 
Macintosh,  son  to  Macintosh  of  that  Ilk:  William,  the  eldest  son,  inclining  to  the 
church,  upon  the  29th  April  148S  renounced  his  right  to  the  estate,  which  the 
father  entailed  to  his  second  son  John  and  his  heirs,  who,  in  virtue  thereof,  was 
infeft  in  the  1493,  and  the  father  being  then  aged,  yielded  the  estate  to  him,  and 
retired. 

This  John  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  to  Hugh  Ross  of  Kilravock,  aiino  1492, 
and  died  the  year  following,  leaving  his  wife  big  with  child  of  two  daughters, 
Janet  and  Murriell;  Janet  died  young,  and  Murriell  succeeded  to  the  estate  in  vir- 
tue of  the  entail  made  by  her  grandfather. 

Archibald,  the  second  Earl  of  Argyle,  and  Hugh  Ross  of  Kilravock,  uncle  to  the 
said  Murriell  Calder,  being  appointed  tutors  dative  to  her  by  King  James  IV. 
anno  1494,  Kilravock  delivered  up  the  young  lady  to  Campbell  of  Innerliver, 
who  had  come  to  Kilravock  in  the  year  1499,  with  sixty  men  to  carry  her  to  In- 
verary,  to  be  educated  in  the  family  of  Argyle.  But,  in  their  way  tlilther,  they 
were  pursued  by  Hutcheon  Calder  her  father's  brother,  and  a  body  of  men  who 
came  up  with  them  in  Strathnairn,  whereupon  Inverliver  sent  her  away  with  one 
of  his  sons,  aixl  a  few  men,  and  with  the  rest  gave  the  Calders  diversion,  till  he 
was  sure  she  was  at  a  considerable  distance ;  and  when  he  had  got  clear  of  the  Cal- 
ders, with  some  loss  on  both  sides,  he  followed  and  conducted  her  to  Inverary, 
where  she  was  educated,  and,  in  anno  1510,  married  to  Sir  John  Campbell,  the  Earl 
of  Argyle's  second  son,  by  his  Countess  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  John  the  first  Earl 
of  Lennox,  to  whom  the  Earl  gave  the  lands  of  Lochow.  After  this  marriage. 
Sir  John  Campbell  continued  his  own  surname,  and  did  not  assume  that  of  Calder, 
as  is  frequently  done  by  those  who  marry  heiresses,  whereby  he  seemed  rather  to 
found  a  new  family,  than  to  continue  an  old  one,  which  so  exasperated  the  heirs- 
male^  and  relations  of  the  name  of  Calder,  that  they  had  constant  feuds  and  skir- 
mishes with  the  Campbells  of  Calder  for  a  considerable  time,  and  carried  off"  all 
the  ancient  writings  belonging  to  the  family,  which  are  since  either  lost  or  de- 
stroyed ;  and  this,  in  a  great  measure,  has  occasioned  the  original  transactions  of 
the  family  of  Calder  to  be  in  so  much  obscurity.     But  to  return. 

Sir  John  Campbell  of  Calder  had  issue  by  Murriell  Calder,  six  sons,  viz.  Archi- 
bald who  succeeded  him,  John,  bishop  of  the  Isles,  of  whom  are  descended  the 
families  of  Inverstrigan  and  Ardchattan  ;  Donald,  of  whom  the  family  of  Kirkton, 
Sonchan,  and  Balnabie;  Duncan  and  William,  who  had  no  issue,  and  Alexander 

"  Bearers.   The  original  charter  is  m  the  possession  of  Rear-Admiral  Sir  Robert  Calder,  and  grandson  of 
"  Sir  Thomas  Calder." 

"  Edinburgh,   aglh  September  1802." 

[This  note  was  of  the  above  date  affixed  by  Admiral  Sir  Robert  Calder,  Baronet,  to  a  copy  of  the 
former  edition  of  this  work  in  the  Advocates'  Library,  from  which  it  is  here  copied.     £.] 

(fl)  Dr  Abercromby's  history,     (i)  Lesley  in  vita  Jacob.  IL     (c)  Charta  penes  D.  de  Calder. 


:32  APPENDIX. 

of  Flynes,  ancestor  to  the  families  of  Moy  and  Torrich,  and  as  many  daughters ; 
Katharine,  married  to  James  Lord  Ogilvie,  thereafter  to  the  Earl  of  Crawford  ■ 

Jean,  married  to  Alexander  Lord  Lovat ;  ___married  to  Ross  of  Balna- 

gowan  ;  married  to  Urquhart  of  Meldrum  ;  Isabel,  married  to  M'Dougall 

of  Rary  ;  and married  to of  Folly. 

Sir  Archibald  succeeded  his  father  Sir  John  ;  he  married  Isabel,  daughter  to 
Grant  of  that  Ilk,  by  whom  he  had  a  daughter,  who  was  married  to  Grant  of  Glen- 
moriston,  and  a  son  who  succeeded  him. 

Sir  John,  who  was  a  very  accomplished  gentleman  ;  he  was  tutor  to  Archibald 
Earl  of  Argyle,  which  office  he  discharged  with  so  much  integrity  and  fidelity,  as 
procured  him  the  malice  of  the  enemies  of  that  noble  family,  who  caused  murder 
him  at  Knipach  in  1592.  He  married  jMarion,  daughter  to  William  Eail  Maris- 
chal  of  Scotland,  by  whom  he  had  five  sons,  John,  who  succeeded  him,  Alexander, 
Archibald,  and  William,  who  all  died  without  issue,  and  Cohn,  ancestor  of  the 
family  of  Dell  in  Isla,  and  two  daughters,  Margaret,  who  was  married  to  Sir  James 
M'Donald  of  Isla,  who  was  chief  of  that  ancient  and  heroic  name,  and  Beatrix, 
who  was  married  to  Campbell  of  Glenfauchin  :  Besides  these.  Sir  John  had  a  na- 
tural son,  (as  is  thought,  by  a  lady  of  quality)  named  Donald,  who  proved  a  very 
fine  gentleman,  and  was  active  in  prosecuting  his  father's  murderers,  several  of 
whom  were  brought  to  condign  punishment.  He  was  created  a  K.night  Baronet 
of  A'6^'^  Scotia  by  King  Charles  L  by  the  title  of  Sir  Donald  Campbell  of  Ardna- 
nuirchan,  and  married  Macintosh's  widow;  but  dying  without  issue,  left  his  estate 
to  George,  tutor  of  Calder,  his  brother's  son.  Sir  John  Campbell  had  likewise  two 
natural  daughters,  Jean,  married  to  Dallas  of  Cantray,  and  Euphame,  married  to 
James  Campbell  of  Auchindown. 

Sir  John  Campbell,  eldest  son  to  the  former  Sir  John,  first  married  Anne,  daugh- 
ter to  Sir  Duncan  Campbell  of  Glenorchy,  great  grandfather  to  the  present  Earl 
of  Breadalbane,  by  whom  he  had  six  sons,  viz.  John,  who  succeeded  him,  Colin, 
who  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  to  Brodie  of  that  Ilk,  George,  who  was  tutor  to 
his  nephew  Sir  Hugh  Campbell  of  Calder,  and  married  the  Captain  of  DunstafT- 
nage's  daughter,  of  whom  are  descended  the  famihes  of  Airds  and  Odomore,  and 
Robert,  Alexander,  and  Duncan,  who  all  died  without  issue  ;  and  one  daughter, 
Jean,  who  was  married  to  Dunbar  of  Grange.  After  the  death  of  his  first  lady. 
Sir  John  married  Margaret,  daughter  to  William  Earl  of  Angus,  by  whom  he  had 
one  son,  James,  v.'ho  was  married  to  the  widow  of  Sir  Donald  Campbell  of  Ardna- 
murchan,  but  had  no  issue  ;  and  one  daughter,  Mary,  who  was  married  to  Alex- 
ander Campbell  of  Sinderland  :  but  soon  after  his  second  marriage,  King  Charles  I.'s 
wars  coming  on,  he  zealously  adhered  to  the  royal  interest,  for  which  he  was  for- 
feit by  Oliver  Cromwell,  and  obliged  to  retire  to  France  until  the  Restoration ;  but 
his  son  Sir  John,  being  in  the  fee  of  the  estate  before  the  forfeiture,  retained  pos- 
session of  it.  After  the  Restoration  he  returned  home,  and  built  a  handsome  cha- 
pel at  the  house  of  Calder,  and  being  then  old,  retired  to  Muckairn  in  Argyle- 
shire,  where  he  died,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  eldest  son 

Sir  John,  who  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  to  Sir  Thomas  Urquhart  of  Cromar- 
ty, by  whom  he  had  a  son,  Cohn,  who  died  in  his  youth,  and  two  daughters, 
Jean,  who  was  married  to  William  Lord  Forbes,  and  Christian,  to  Dunbar  of  Til- 
linach.     He  was  succeeded  by  his  nephew 

Sir  Hugh,  eldest  son  to  Colin,  second  son  to  Sir  John  Campbell,  and  Anne, 
daughter  to  Sir  Duncan  Campbell  of  Glenorchy,  and  EHzabeth  Brodie  his  spouse ; 
he  married  Henrietta  Stewart,  daughter  to  James  Earl  of  Murray,  by  whom  he 
had  four  sons,  Alexander,  who  succeeded  him.  Sir  Archibald  of  Clunies,  who  mar- 
ried Anne  M'Pherson,  on  child  of  Duncan  M'Pherson  of  Clunie,  chieftain  of  that 
name,  by  whom  he  has  issue :  and  Colin  and  George,  who  were  both  captains  in 
Queen  Anne's  wars,  and  there  slain,  leaving  no  issue.  Sir  Hugh  had  also  four 
daughters,  Margaret,  who  was  married  to  Hugh  Ross  of  Kilravock,  Jean,  mar- 
ried to  Urquhart  of  Meldrum,  Sophia  to  Brodie  of  Lethen,  and  Anne  to  M'Lean 
of  Lochbuy. 

Sir  Alexander  succeeded  to  his  father  Sir  Hugh ;  he  married  Elizabeth  Lort, 
daughter  to  Sir  John  Lort  of  Stackpoole  in  South  Wales,  by  whom  he  had  issue, 
I 


APPENDIX.  2S3 

John  his  successor,  and  two  daughters ;  Susanna,  married  to  Sir  James  Campbell 
of  Auchinbreack,  and  Anne,  married  to  PMmund  Merris  ot" Esq. 

John  Campbell,  now  ot"  Caldcr,  Esq.  married  Mary  Price,  daughter  to  Lewis 
Price  of  Gogarthan  in  South  Wales,  Esq.  by  whom  he  has  issue.  He  is  master  of 
an  opulent  fortune,  present  member  of  Parliament  for  the  county  of  Pembroke, 
and  one  ot"  the  Lords  Commissioners  of  the  Admiralty  ;  and  it  is  expected  will 
make  an  appearance  not  unworthy  of  his  ancestors  ;  his  children  will  succeed  to 
the  estates  of  Calder,  Stackpoole,  and  Gogarthan. 

Before  finishing  this  account  of  the  family  of  Cakler,  it  will  not  be  improper  to 
observe,  that  though  none  of  the  family  of  Calder  were  created  baronets,  yet,  since 
the  marriage  of  Sir  John  Campbell  with  the  heiress  of  Calder,  each  of  the  repre- 
sentatives of  the  family  (except  the  present)  have  had  the  honour  of  knighthood 
conferred  upon  them,  for  their  personal  merit. 


BOTHWELL  Lord  Holyroodhouse. 


THE  surname  of  Bothwell  must  needs  be  exceedingly  ancient;  for  it  cannot  be 
a  questiont  hat  it  was  taken  from  the  great  estate  and  lordship  of  Bothwell,  in 
the  county  of  Lanark,  by  the  ancient  proprietors,  when  surnames  were  assumed 
among  us,  and  transmitted  as  hereditary,  to  difference  and  distinguish  persons  and 
families  from  one  another :  It  is  very  presumable,  yea  highly  probable  from 
some  presumptions,  that  the  Oliphards,  once  a  great  family,  and  powerful,  got 
the  barony  of  Bothwell,  by  marriage  of  an  heir-female  of  the  surname  of  Bothwell, 
as  soon  as  the  reign  of  King  Alexander  IL  («)  and  which,  from  certain  documents 
and  vouchers  in  the  next  succeeding  reign,  came  to  another  heir-female,  who  mar- 
ried Sir  Andrew  Murray,  who,  upon  that,  is  designed  Dominus  de  Bothwell  jfiis- 
titiaritis  ac  Panitarius  Scotice  {by.  However,  the  family  of  the  surname  of  Both- 
well,  it  is  most  certain,  continued  in  the  male  line  ever  after  this  :  For  vouching 
this,  there  is  a  charter  still  extant  in  the  rolls  of  King  David  IL  in  the  public  ar- 
chives, "  Dilecto  consanguineo  suo  (the  king's  cousin,  as  he  does  him  the  honour 
"  to  call  him)  Johanni  de  Bothwell  de  decem  solidis  Sterlingorum  et  quatuor  chal- 
"  dris  farinas,  nobis  debitis  de  Thanagio  de  Darvon  in  vicecomitatu  de  Bamtf,  pro 
"  omnibus  vitie  sua:  diebus."  The  charter  is  dated  at  Dundee,  the  31st  July,  the 
37th  year  of  his  reign,  that  is,  the  year  of  our  Lord  1369.  The  same  prince  gives 
another  charter  to  the  foresaid  John  Bothwell,  "  Dilecto  consanguineo  suo  omnes 
"  terras  Parci  nostri  de  Inchbuthell,  jacen.  infra  vicecomitatum  de  Bamff,  pro 
"  vita  sua.  Apud  Edinburgh  decimo  nono  die  Mensis  Aprilis,  anno  Regni  nostri 
"  quadragesimo  primo  1371."  The  family  of  the  Bothwells  at  length  came  and 
fixed  their  residence  in  the  city  of  Edinburgh,  where  they  had  a  very  considerable 
estate  in  lands,  so  that  they  grew  up  to  be  among  the  greatest  burgesses  of  any 
other  wljatsoever,  both  with  regard  to  opulency  and  reputation,  and  allied  with 
many  of  the  first  families  in  the  kingdom,  as  will  evidently  appear  from  the  sequel 
of  this  memorial. 

Since  the  family  of  Bothwells  came  to  Edinburgh,  I  have  not  seen  writs,  or  any 
other  documents,  carrying  back  the  family  of  the  Bothwells  farther  than  the  reign 
of  King  Jair.es  HI.  that  Richard  Bothwell,  the  ancestor  of  this  family,  was  provost 
of  that  city  (c),  and  executed  the  office  with  great  discretion  in  a  very  turbulent 
time.  He  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  William  Somerville  of  Plain  (rf),  in  the 
county  of  Stirling,  who  was  the  second  son  of  William  Lord  Somerville  (f),  by 
whom  he  had  two  sons  and  a  daughter,  Mr  Francis  his  eldest  son,  who  carried 
down  the  line  of  his  progeny  ;  and  Mr  Richard  Bothwell,  who,  being  bred  to  the 

{a)  Chartulary  of  the  Episcopal  See  of  Glasgow,  (i)  Ibidem,  (c)  Charta  peaes  Dominura  Holy- 
ruodhouse.     (</}  Ibidem,     (f)  Charta  in  piiblicib  aichivis. 

Vol.  II.  .  6  U 


234  APPENDIX. 

service  of  the  church,  and  taking  holy  orders,  was  made  a  prebend  of  the  cathe- 
dral church  of  Glasgow,  and  was  rector  of  Ashkirk  (/),  being  a  person  well  seen 
both  in  the  civil  and  canon  law,  and  was  created  a  doctor  in  both :  He  was  prefer- 
red to  the  provostry  of  the  kirk  of  our  Lady  in  the  Fields,  within  the  walls  of  the 
city  of  Edinburgh.  "  Praepositus  Ecclesiae  Sanctae  Maritc,  de  Campis  infra  muros 
"  civitatis  Edinburgen."  I  have  found  him  so  designed  in  a  deed  in  the  i534(<f), 
to  which  his  seal  of  arms  is  appended;  the  cheveron  charged  with  the  mullet,  be- 
twixt the  three  trefoils  (A).  He  was  also  director  of  the  Chancery  in  the 
reign  of  King  James  V.  and  one  of  the  first  Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice  ; 
he  died  in  the  1547  (/).  Margaret,  the  only  daughter,  was  married  to  Sir  Dun- 
can Forrest  of  Garden,  Comptroller  in  the  reign  of  King  James  IV.  anno  1503  {k). 

Mr  Francis  Bothwell,  the  elder  brother,  was  a  learned  worthy  man  :  In  the 
1535  both  he  and  his  brother.  Doctor  Richard  Bothwell,  were  named  Senators 
ot  the  College  of  Justice  at  the  institution  of  the  Court  of  Session  by  King  James 
V.  (/),  the  one  upon  the  temporal  side,  and  the  other  upon  the  spiritual ;  and  at 
the  very  same  time,  anno  1535,  he  was  Provost  of  the  city  of  Edinburgh,  as  is  evi- 
dent from  the  records  and  registers  of  Parliament.  He  married  Janet,  one  of  the 
two  daughters  and  co-heirs  of  Patrick  Richardson  of  Meldrumsheugh,  and  got  with 
her  these  lands  lying  within  the  regality  of  Broughton,  and  shire  of  Edinburgh. 
In  his  infeftments  he  is  designed  Ma^^ister  Francisciis  Bothwell,  honorabilis  vir 
hurgen.  burgi  de  Edinburgh  (m).  He  had  by  his  wife  two  sons  and  one  daughter, 
Richard,  who  was  Provost  of  Edinburgh,  and  allied  in  marriage  with  the  House 
of  Halton  (;?J.  But  his  male  progeny  are  all  worn  out  and  extinct;  Mr  Adam 
Bothwell  the  second  son,  and  Janet,  who  was  married  to  Sir  Archibald  Napier  of 
Merchiston,  mother  by  line  to  the  honourable  and  learned  mathematician  John 
Napier  of  Merchiston  (</),  inventor  of  the  Logarithms.  Mr  Adam,  whose  son  laid 
the  foundation  of  the  honour  and  dignity  of  Lord  Holyroodhouse,  was  educate  to 
the  service  of  the  church,  and,  after  passing  through  some  inferior  offices  in  the 
church,  he  was  elected  bishop  of  Orkney,  and  had  the  Qiieen's  letters  patent  con- 
firming the  deed  of  the  chapter,  8th  of  October  1562  (^),  the  See  being  void  by 
the  demise  of  Bishop  Reid  (ji). 

Bishop  Bothwell  of  Orkney  fell  in  with  the  Reformation,  and  acted  in  a  parity 
with  Mr  Knox  and  others,  in  settling  the  whole  system  of  the  reformed  doctrine, 
though  they  left  the  discipline  more  at  large.  The  bishop  being  invested  in  his 
bishopric  with  a  full  power  to  alienate,  if  he  had  a  mind,  the  whole  benefice,  he 
made  an  exchange  of  the  bishopric  of  Orkney  with  Robert  Stewart,  commenda- 
ror  of  Holyroodhouse,  natural  son  to  King  James  V.  for  the  Abbey  of  Holyrood- 
house, which  is  ratified  and  confirmed  to  the  bishop  the  25th  of  September 
1569  (/):  He  was  after  that  made  one  of  the  Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice; 
which  office  he  enjoyed  till  his  death  on  the  23d  of  August  1593.  He  was  inter- 
red in  the  nave  of  the  Abbey-church  of  Holyroodhouse,  with  a  tomb  over  him, 
with  his  name  and  arms ;  and  underneath  a  tabulature  there  is  this  inscription  and 
epitaph. 

"  Hie  jacet  reconditus,  nobilissimus  vir,  dominus  Adamus  Bothuelius,  episcopus 
"  Orcadum  et  Zetlandce,  et  Commendatarius  Monasterii  Sanctae  Crucis,  Senator  et 
"  Concilarius  Regis,  qui  obiit  anno  aetatis  suce  67.  Die  Mensis  Augusti  23.  anno 
"  Domini  1593." 

Englished  thus. 

Here  lies  a  most  noble  Lord,  Adam  Bothwell,  Bishop  of  Orkney  and  Zetland,- 
Commendator  of  the  Monastery  of  Holyroodhouse,  and  one  of  the  Lords  of  Council 
and  Session,  who  died  upon  the  23d  day  of  August  1593,  and  in  the  67th  year  of 
his  age. 

{f)  Chart.  Glasgiien.  (j)  Cliarta  penes  Dommum  Ross,  {h)  Charta  in  rotulis.  (/)  Acts  of  Par- 
liament, (".f)  Charta  in  publicis  arcliivis,  ad  annum  1503.  ("/)  Acts  of  Parliament,  (m^  Cliarta  penes 
Domir.um  Holyroodhouse,  and  registers  of  the  regality  of  Broughton.  (.«)  Charta  penes  Dominum  Holy- 
roodhouse. {0)  Charta  penes  Dominum  Napier,  (p)  Charter  under  the  Great  Seal,  in  the  public  ar- 
chives, anno  1562.     Cy_)  Archbishop  Spottiswood's  History,     fr)  Charter  in  the  public  records. 


APPENDIX.  235 


EPITAPHIUM. 

Nate  senatoris  magni,  magne  ipse  senator, 

Magni  senatoris  triplici  laude  paiens  ; 
Tempore  cujus  opetn  poscens  ecclesia  sensit, 

Amplexus  est  cujus  cura  forensis  opem. 
Vixisti,  ex  animi  voto,  jam  plenus  hononim, 

Plenus  opum  senii,  jam  quoque  plenus  obis, 
Sic  nihil  urna  tui  nisi  membra  senilia  celat. 

Teque  vetat  virtus  vir  tua  magne  mori, 
I  felix  mortem  requie  superato  supremam, 

Sic  patria;  et  libcris  fama  perennis  erit. 


The  above  Epitaph  in  English, 

Thrice  worthy  judge,  son  to  and  father  also  of  a  judge, 

Whose  aid  the  church  in  time  of  need  did  feel. 

And  no  less  on  the  bench  thy  care  was  knoivn. 

As  heart  could  wish  thy  days  thou  well  didst  spend, 

And  now  with  honour,  and  with  age  full  fraught, 

To  peaceful  shades  thou  mak'st  a  safe  retreat. 

Of  thee,  great  man,  here  nothing  but  thy  dust  does  lie, 

Yet  for  thy  virtuous  life  thy  name  shall  never  die. 

Go  happy  hence,  and  to  all  ages  blest,  thy  fame 

Shall  by  thy  sons  and  country  ever  be  rehearst. 

The  Bishop  of  Orkney  left  issue  by  Margaret  his  wife,  daughter  to  John  Murray 
of  Touchadam  in  the  county  of  Stirling,  by  Janet  his  wife,  daughter  of  the  Lord 
Erskine,  and  sister  to  the  Earl  of  Marr  the  Regent  (j-),  by  whom  he  had  issue, 

John,  his  eldest  son,  thereafter  Lord^Holyroodhouse. 

William,  the  second  son,  who  had  a  grant  of  several  lands  from  his  father,  as 
Commendator  of  Holyroodhouse,  within  the  regality  of  Broughton,  dated  the  12th 
of  May  1582  ;  in  the  deed  the  granter  designed  him  Gulielmo  Bothwel  Jilio  meo  le- 
gitimo  (/),  of  whom  this  present  Lord  Holyroodhouse  derives  his  descent  {u). 

Margaret,  a  daughter,  who  was  married  to  WiUiam  Sandilands  of  St  Monans, 
ancestor  to  the  Lords  of  Abercromby  (.v),  and  had  issue. 

Mr  John  Bothwell,  designed  of  Alhammer,  succeeded  his  father  in  the  com- 
mendatory of  the  Abbey  of  Holyroodhouse,  and  in  his  seat  on  the  Bench  in  the 
Session;  and  getting  into  a  considerable  degree  of  favour  and  confidence  with  his 
Majesty  King  James  VI.  he  was  graciously  pleased  to  erect,  unite,  and  incorporate, 
all  the  lands  that  had  formerly  pertained  to  the  abbey,  and  haill  convent,  into  a 
temporal  lordship,  "  Omni  tempore  a  futuro  Dominium  de  Holyroodhouse  nun- 
"  cupandum"  (  v).  The  peerage  is  specially  provided  to  the  heirs-male  of  the  pa- 
tentee's own  body ;  which  failing,  to  the  heirs-male  of  Adam  Bishop  of  Orkney 
his  father.  He  married  Mary,  daughter  of  Sir  John  Carmichael  of  that  Ilk  ;  and 
dying  in  November  in  the  year  1609,  was  succeeded  by  John  Lord  Holyroodhouse, 
his  son  and  heir,  who  died  unmarried  in  the  year  1635  {%).  The  title  of  honour 
was  by  no  means  extinct,  but  it  lay  dormant  for  a  hundred  years,  save  one,  that 
Henry  Bothwell  of  Glencross,  as  heir-male  to  the  Lord  Holyroodhouse's  dignity, 
was  served  heir  to  him  on  the  8th  of  February  1734,  he  being  the  nephew  of  his 
great-grandfather's  father;  thus  reckoning  the  line  of  the  descent,  that  William 
Bothwell,  who  was  his  predecessor,  was  the  second  lawful  son  of  Adam  Bishop  of 
Orkney,  brother-german  to  John,  the  first  Lord  Holyroodhouse,  the  patentee,  who, 
by  his  wife  Helen,  daughter  of  John  Cunningham  of  Drumquhassell,  had  Adam 
Bothwell  of  Fhilpside,  his  son  and  heir;  who,  by  Janet  his  wife,  daughter  of  Sir 
William  Hart  01  Preston,  Justice-Depute  in  the  reign  of  King  James  VI.  had  a  son, 
iiis  lineal  heir. 

(j-)  Charter  under  the  Great  Seal  In  the  public  records.  (/)  Register  of  the  Regality  of  Broughton. 
C«)  Retour  of  this  Lord  Holyroodhouse,  1734.  (v)  Origi'ial  patent  of  the  erection  of  the  Abbey  of 
Holyroodhouse,.  in  the  public  archives.  (_)')  Charta  in  Cancellaria,  S.  D.  N.  Regis.  (a;)  Charta  in 
rotulls. 


n^e  APPENDIX. 

Alexander.  Bofhwell  of  Glencross,  who,  by  Mavy  his  wife,  daughter  of  Sii 
James  Stewart,  knight,  son  to  Robert  Earl  of  Orkney,  who  was  one  of  the  natural 
sons  of  King  James  V.  had  Alexander  Bothwell  of  Glencross,  his  son  and  heir, 
who,  by  Janet  his  wife,  daughter  of  John  Trotter  of  Mortonhall,  had 

Henry,  now  Lord  Holyroodhouse,  who  married  Mary  Campbell,  daughter  of 
Lord  Neil  Campbell,  second  son  of  Archibald  Marquis  of  Argyle,  and  of  Vere 
Ker,  his  wife,  daughter  of  William  Earl  of  Lothian,  by  whom  he  has  issue 

Alexander,  Master  of  Holyroodhouse,  who  married  Lady  Margaret  Home, 
daughter  of  diaries  Earl  of  Home. 

Neil  Bothwell,  Esq.  who  is  Factor  to  the  South-Sea  Company. 

Archibald  Bothwell,  Esq.  the  third  son,  who  is  Master  of  his  Majesty's  Mint 
in  Scotland. 

Henry  Bothwell,  who  lives  abroad  in  France,  and 

Robert,  a  surgeon  in  Jamaica. 

And  four  daughters,  Vere,  Eleanora,  Mary,  and  Anne,  the  eldest  of  whom  is 
married  to  Mr  Francis  Wauchope  of  Kekmuir,  advocate. 


The  family  of  Dc  BERKELEY,  or  BARCLAY,  formerly  of  Mathers,. 

NOW  OF  UrIE. 


WHETHER  the  ancient  surname  of  Berkeley,  or  Barclay,  be  originally  of 
Caledonian,  British,  or  Saxon  extract,  is  what  cannot,  at  this  distance  of  time,  be 
certainly  concluded ;  but  it  is  vouched,  beyond  contradiction,  that  there  were 
four  great  and  eminent  families  of  that  name  settled  in  Scotland,  viz..  IValter  de 
Berkeley,  IVilliam  de  Berkeley,  Humphrey  de  Berkeley,  and  Robert  de  Berkeley,  in  the 
days  of  William  the  Lion  of  Scotland,  and  Henry  11.  of  England ;  the  two  first 
having  been  Great  Chamberlains  of  the  kingdom  ;  Walter  being  so  designed  in  a. 
donation  granted  by  him  to  the  monks  of  Aberbrothock,  of  the  church  of  Iner- 
keleder,  confirmed  by  William  the  Lion,  both  being  in  the  old  chartulary  of  Aber- 
brothock, in  the  Advocates'  Library  in  Edinburgh;  and  William  being  so  design- 
ed a  witness  to  a  deed  granted  by  the  same  king  to  the  monks  of  the  Cistertian 
Order,  copied  from  the  original  by  Anderson,  in  his  Independency  of  Scotland, 
and  all  four  considerable  donators  to  the  abbacies. 

All  these  circumstances  determine  us  to  believe  their  early  settlement  in  this 
kingdom,  no  doubt,  before  the  conquest,  and  makes  it  more  than  probable  that  they 
were  not  of  the  Norman  race;  neither  can  we  certainly  determine  how  long  they 
have  been  settled  in  this  kingdom;  but  this  we  have  sufficiently  vouched,  that  this 
same  Walter  de  Berkeley,  in  the  shire  of  Angus,  was  one  of  the  pledges  for  King 
William  the  Lion  to  Henry  II.  of  England,  as  is  mentioned  in  Abercromby's  His- 
tory of  Scotland,  he  observing  upon  the  margin,  that  the  document  is  in  the 
custody  of  Panmure;  an  evident  demonstration  that  they  had  been  long  settled 
here  before  that  time,  it  not  being  to  be  supposed  that  a  stranger,  immediately 
come  to  the  country,  would  have  been  accepted  of  as  a  pledge  for  the  king ; 
neither  that  such  would  have  been  honoured  or  trusted  with  being  Great  Cham- 
berlains of  the  kingdom.  This  Walter  left  no  children  but  two  daughters,  one  of 
them,  according  to  Nicol's  Peerage,  married  to  Seaton  of  Seaton,  predecessor  to 
the  Earl  of  Winton. 

It  being  certain  that  the  armorial  bearing  of  Berkeley  of  Innerkeleder  was  the 
very  same,  both  in  the  tincture  of  the  field,  viz.  azure,  and  the  crosses  argent, 
that  has  been  always  borne  by  Berkeley  of  Mathers,  and  by  no  other  family  of  the 
name  that  I  know,  or  ever  heard  of,  either  now  in  being,  or  formerly,  excepting  Ber- 
keley Lord  Brechin,  and  their  other  acknowledged  cadets;  for,  according  to  herald- 
ry, this  proves  Brechin  to  have  been  of  them,  Inerkeleder  being  extinct  many  years 
ere  Berkeley  married  the  heiress  of  Brechin ;  1  say,  although  this  proves  Inerkele- 
der and  Mathers  to  have  been  one  family,  yet  we   have   no  sufficient  document 


APPENDIX.  ly, 

positively  to  determine  their  relation;  nevertheless  the  exact  parity  of  their  ar- 
morial bearmg,  the  chcumstances  ot"  time,  Walter  de  Berkeley  of  Inerkeleder,  and 
Humphrey,  son  to  Theobald  de  Berkeley,  being  apparently  cotemporaries,  as  both 
having  confirmations  from  William  the  Lion,  all  these  reasons,  corroborated  by 
constant  tradition,  confirm  us  in  the  belief,  that  IValter  de  Berkeley  of  Inerkeleder 
was  cousin-gerraan  to  Humphrey,  and  brother's  son  to 

I.  Theobald  de  Berkeley,  he  being  the  first  whose  name  is  transmitted  down  to  us 
with  such  certainty  as  we  may  depend  upon  to  have  been  the  original  of  the  fa- 
mily of  Mathers,  he  appearing,  by  unquestionable  records,  to  have  lived  in  the 
days  of  David  I.  of  Scotland,  commonly  called  St  David,  who  began  his  reign 
anno  1 124;  Theobald  being,  as  we  suppose,  born  about  anno  mo,  in  the  3d  year 
of  the  rei^n  of  Alexander  1.  son  to  Malcolm  III.  commonly  called  Canmore,  both 
kings  of  Scotland,  and  loth  of  Henry  I.  son  to  William  the  Conqueror,  both  kings 
of  England.  This  Theobald  had  two  sons,  Humphrey  and  John;  Humphrey,  be- 
ing ui  possession  of  a  large  estate  in  the  shire  of  the  Merns,  did,  according  to  the 
devotion  of  these  times,  upon  part  thereof,  viz.  Balfeith,  Monboddo,  Glenlarquhar, 
&-C.  in  the  parish  of  Fordun,  grant  a  donation  to  the  abbot  and  monks  of  Aber- 
brothock,  witnessed  by  IViUidmo  iS  IValtero  capellcinis  Dom.  re^is,  IVillielmo  Cummin, 
IVillielmo  Giffard,  Philippo  de  Moubray,  Bom.  de  Aberbutbenot,  Philippo  de  MalleviU, 
Johanne  de  Alontjbit,  IValtero  Scot,  Si  JVdlteroJUio  si/o,  Agatha  tponsa  mea,  cum  midtis 
aliis.  This  donation  was  confirmed  by  ^ViUiain  the  Lion  (who  began  his  reign 
anno  1 165)  before  these  witnesses,  IValtero  ifi  IVillielmo  capcllnnis  nostris  Will. 
Cummin,  Philippo  de  Moubray,  Roberto  de  Lundin,  Roberto  de  Berkeley,  cum  multis 
aliis;  apud  Forfar  xxvi.  Martii.  This  same  donation  of  Humphrey's  was  renewed  and 
augmented  by  his  only  child  and  daughter  Richenda,  and  Robert,  the  son  of 
Warnebald,  her  husband,  (who  was,  according  to  Nicol's  Peerage,  predecessor 
to  the  Earl  of  Glencairn)  the  witnesses  thereto  being  Dom.  J.  Wishart  vicecom.  de 
Mernis,  Sj?  Johanne  filio  ejus,  Dom.  Duncano  de  Aberbutbenot,  W  JiHo  ejus,  Humphreo 
de  Middleton,  cum  multis  aliis.  This  second  donation  was  confirmed  by  Alexander  II. 
the  witnesses  thereto  A.  Ahato  de  Melross,  Ro.  Abbato  de  Ne%iibotle,  Tbo.  de  Hay, 
Alex,  de  Seton,  cum  mdtis  aliis,  vicesimo  die  Martii,  anno  re^ni  ?iostri,  vicesimo 
quarto.  After  the  death  of  Robert,  the  son  of  Warnebald,  the  monks  got  P.ichenda, 
his  widow,  to  dispone  these  lands  to  them  for  the  third  time,  "  Et  ad  majus 
"  hujus  rei  testimonium,  in  posterum  una  cum  Sigillo  meo  hujc  scripto,  Sigillum 
"  venerab:  patris  nostri  R.  Abredonensis  Episc.  &  Sigillum  Domini  Anselm 
"  Cammell  feci  apponi,  coram  his  Test.  Dom.  A.  Archide  Brechin,  Dom.  Nigello 
"  de  Moubray,  Dom.  Roberto  de  Montealto,  &  Dom.-  Will,  de  Hunyter,  cum 
"  multis  aliis."  This  third  donation  was  confirmed  by  Alexander  II.  at  Aber- 
brothock,  the  7th  day  of  March,  and  3:^d  year  of  his  reign,  "  corom  test,  ve- 
"  nerab.  Patr.  Ro.  Epis.  Abr.  Willielmo  Comite  de  Marr,  Waltero  de  Moravie, 
"  R.  de  Montealto." 

All  these  six  documents,  viz.  the  three  donations,  and  their  three  respective  confir- 
mations, being  registrate  in  the  ancient  chartulary  of  Aberbrothock,  in  the  Advo- 
cates' Library  in  Edinburgh,  from  whence  the  present  Barclay  of  Urie  had  them 
extracted. 

Notwithstanding  all  this  precaution  of  the  monks,  Humphrey  and  his  daughter 
Richenda  being  dead,  and  he  having  no  heirs-male  of  his  own  bod}',  was  succeed- 
ed by  his  brother, 

II.  John  de  Berkeley,  who  not  being  satisfied  with  the  liberality  of  his  brother, 
and  the  other  two  donators,  turned  the  abbot  and  monks  out  of  all  their  possessions 
in  his  lands;  but  was  obliged,  with  consent  and  concurrence  of  his  son  and  heir, 
Robert  de  Berkeley,  to  come  to  an  .agreement  with  them,  whereby,  in  lieu  of  what 
he  dispossessed  them,  to  give  them  the  mill  of  Conveth,  with  the  appurtenances 
thereof,  binding  them  at  the  same  time  to  pay  him  and  his  heirs,  in  all  time 
coming,  the  sum  of  thirteen  merks  of  silver  yearly. 

This  agreement  was  not  only  signed  and  sealed  by  the  abbot  and  monks  of  Aber- 
brothock. by  John,  and  his  heir  Robert  de  Berkeley,  but  also  "  Una  cum  Sigillis 
"  venevab.  virorum  Greg.  Episco.  Brechin  &■  Dom.  Willielmo  de  Bosco,  Dom. 
"  regis  Can.  &.  Dom.  de  Lunden,  fratris  illustr.   regis  Alex,  apponi.  procurarent : ' 

VoL.IL  6X 


~3^ 


APPENDIX. 


"  coiani  test.  Willielmo  Capellano,  Dom.  Episco.  Brechin,  mag.  Andrea  de  Perth, 
"  mag.  Hugo  de  Milburn,  cum  multisaliis,"  and  confirmed  by  King  Alexander  II. 
at  Dundee,  the  ist  of  January,  "  coram  test.  Greg.  Episco.  Brechin,  WiUielmo 
"  de  Bosco  nostro  Cancellario,  Ro.  de  Lunden,  nostro  fratre,  Hugo  Cameron,  cum 
"  multis  aliis." 

Both  this  agreement  and  the  confirmation  thereof,  are  also  extracted  out  of 
the  chartulary  of  Aberbrothock. 

According  to  what  hath  been  aheady  observed,  of  Theobald's  being  born  about 
/?n/70  mo,  and  that  his  son  John's  agreement  with  the  abbot  and  monks  being 
confirmed  by  Alexander  II.  it  naturally  follows  that  Theobald,  Humphrey,  and 
John,  must  have  lived  in  the  days  of  Alexander  I.  David  I.  Malcolm  IV.  William 
"the  Lion,  Alexander  II.,  all  kings  of  Scotland;  and  of  Henry  1.  King  Stephen, 
Henry  II.  (the  first  of  the  name  of  Plantagenet)  Richard  I.  and  John,  all  kings  of 
England.  It  may  also  be  observed,  that  during  that  time  Jerusalem  being  taken 
by  Godfrey  of  Boulogne,  and  the  >var  in  the  Holy  Land  carried  on  by  the  Chris- 
tians against  the  Saracens,  that  the  armorial  bearing  of  the  Berkeleys  makes  it 
Very  probable  they  were  of  the  number  of  those  zealots  who  put  on  the  cross, 
a-;  is  positively  asserted  by  Camden.  Upon  John's  death  he  was  succeeded  by  his 
son 

III.  Robert  de  Berkeley,  who,  as  is  already  observer^,  consented  to  the  agreement 
between  his  father  and  the  abbot,  and  the  monks  of  Aberbrothock,  being  succeed- 
ed by  his  son 

IV.  Hugh  de  Berkeley,  who  obtained  a  charter  from  King  Robert  Bruce, 
upon  Westerton,  being  lands  lying  near  to  the  above-mentioned  mill  of  Conveth  ; 
which  charter  Nisbet  asserts  to  be  registrate  in  the  chartulary  of  Melrose,  his  son's 
name  being 

V.  Alexantder  de  Berkeley  of  Mathers,  who  by  marrying  Katharine,  sister  to 
William  df  Keith  Marischal  of  Scotland,  obtained  the  lands  of  Mathers,  which  he 
added  to  his  paternal  estate,  vouched  by  a  charter,  dated  anno  1351,  granted  by 
the  said  IVilliam  de  Keith,  with  consent  (as  the  charter  words  it)  of  Margaret  my 
wife,  to  Alexander  de  Berkdcy,  and  Katharine  my  sister,  his  spouse,  and  the  longest 
liver  of  them  two,  and  the"  heirs-male  of  their  bodies ;  my  lands  of  Mathers, 
"  datum  apud  mansum  capitale  nostrum  de  Strathekin  die  Martii  inventione 
"  sanctre  crucis,  anno  1351,  coram  test,  reverendo  in  Christo  Patr.  Dom. 
"  Phihppo,  Dei  Gratia  Episc.  Brechin,  Dom.  Willielmo  eadem  gratia  Abbato  de 
"■  Aberbrothick,  David  de  Fleming,  Willielmo  de  Liddel  militibus,  Johannes  de 
"  Seton,  et  aliis. 

This  charter  of  Marischals  being  repeated  verbatim,  is  confirmed  by  King  David 
Bruce,  at  Perth  the  i8th  day  of  March,  and  21st  of  his  reign,  "  coram  test._ 
"  Roberto  Seneschallo  nepote  nostro  (the  first  king  of  Scotland  of  the  name  of 
"  Stewart)  Tho.  Seneschall  comite  de  Angus,  Tho.  de  Moravie  panacri  nostro 
"  Scotias,  Roberto  de  Erskine,  et  Tho.  de  Falside  militibus." 

This  original  charter  from  Marischal,  with  the  original  confirmation  thereof  by 
King  David  Bruce,  are  both  in  the  custody  of  the  present  Barclay  of  Urie.  Upon 
the  death  of  this  Alexander  he  was  succeeded  by  his  son 

VI.  David  de  Berkeley  of  Mathers,  who,  by  all  the  accounts  we  have,  married 

Seaton,  daughter  to  the  same  John  de  Seaton,  who  witnessed  the 

preceding  charter  from  Marischal,  to  his  father  :  their  son's  name  being 

VII.  Alexander  t'/c  Berkeley  of  Mathers,  by  the  tradition  of  our  fiimily   he 

married  Helen  Graham,  daughter  to Graham  of  Morphy  ;  their  son 

being 

VIII.  David  de  Berkeley  of  Mathers,  ^\^ho.  as  is  supposed,  built  the  castle 
called  the  Keim  of  Mathers,  where  the  family,  for  their  better  security,  lived  for 
a  while  during  some  troublesome  times.  By  all  the  accounts  we  have,  he  mar- 
ried Elizabeth  Strachan,  daughter  to  Strachan  of  Thornton,  then  an  ancient  and 
flourishing  family  in  the  Merns ;  who  bore  to  him 

IX.  Alexander  Barclay  of  Mathers,  v.'ho  is  the  first  of  our  family  whose  name 
we  find,  both  by  old  evidents  and  by  his  own  subscriptions,  spelled  as  we  now  do, 
viz.  Barclay,  by  a  charter  granted  to  him  by  'William  Earl  Marischal,  Shentf-prin- 


APPENDIX.  239 

cipal  and  High  Constable  of  the  shire  of  the  Merns,  wherein  he  terms  him  Dilecto 
coiuangulneo  nostra,  i.  e.  To  our  beloved  kinsman  Alexander  Barclay  of  Mathers, 
and  Katharine  his  wife,  (this  was  Katharine  VVishart)  dated  anna  1483  ;  which 
charter  we  have  in  the  family.  As  he  lived  to  old  age,  so  upon  his  son's  marriage 
he  put  him  in  possession  of  the  old  estate,  reserving  Mathers  to  himself  during 
life  :  As  he  was  reputed  a  scholar,  and  something  of  a  poet,  so  to  him  are  ascribed 
the  verses  made  by  a  laird  of  Mathers,  and  given  as  advice  to  his  son  and  suc- 
cessors, which  as  worthy  I  insert. 

GifFthou  desire  thy  house  lang  stand, 
And  thy  successors  bruik  thy  land  ; 
Abive  all  things  live  God  in  fear, 
Intromit  nought  with  wrangom  gear  ; 
Nor  conquess  nothing  wrangously. 
With  thy  neighbour  keep  cliarity. 
See  that  thou  pass  not  thy  estate, 
v.   -  Obey  duly  thy  magistrate  : 

Oppress  not,  but  support  the  puire. 
To  help  the  common  vveill  take  cuire. 
'  ■  ,  •  Use  no  deceit,  mell  not  with  treason. 

And  to  all  men  do  right  and  reason  : 
Both  unto  word  and  deed  be  true. 
All  kind  of  wickedness  eschew. 
Slay  no  man,  nor  thereto  consent, 
Be  nought  cruel,  but  patient. 
'    ■  Allay  ay  in  some  guid  place. 

With  noble,  honest,  godly  race  r 

Hate  huirdome,  and  all  vices  dec. 

Be  humble,  hjunt  guid  companie. 

Help  thy  friend  and  do  nae  wrang. 

And  God  shall  cause  thy  house  stand  lang. 

It  appears,  by  the  above  document,  he  married  the  already-mentioned  Katha- 
rine Wishart,  daughter  to  Wishart  of  Pittarrow,  a  family  for  a  long  time  of 
great  eminency  in  the  Merns ;  some  of  them  having  been  high  or  principal 
sheriffs  thereof,  being  so  designed  in  several  of  our  ancient  papers  :  She  bore  to 
him, 

X.  D.tviD  Barclay  of  Mathers,  who  married  Janet  Irvine,  daughter  to  Irvine 
of  Drum,  then  one  of  the  most  considerable  families  in  the  shire  of  Aberdeen. 
This  our  marriage  with  Drum's  daughter  we  have  vouched  by  several  documents 
in  the  family,  viz.  an  ancient  manuscript,  wrote  anno  157S,  intitled,  Genealogy  of 
the  Barons  of  tlye  Merns,  (in  which  are  inserted  the  above  verses)  as  also  by 
charters  upon  the  lands  of  Falside  and  Slains,  in  the  Merns.  Hfs  eklest  son 
was 

XI.  Ales-ander  BaR-CLay  of  Mathers,  vouched  by  the  genealogy  of  the  barons 
of  the  Merns,  old  charters,  &c.  to  liave  married  Marjory  Auchinleck,  second 
daughter  to  James  Auchinleck,  Laird  of  Glenbervie,  who  was  son  to  John  Auchin- 
leck ni  Auchinleck  in  Angus,  and  who,  by  marrying  the  only  daughter  of  that 
same  sheritf,  John  Melville,  that  was  killed  by  the  barons  of  the  Merns,  obtained 
the  estate  of  Glenbervie. 

This  same  James  Auchinleck  leaving  no  children  but  two  daughters,  the  eldest 
being  married  to  Sir  William  Douglas,  second  son  to  the  famous  Earl  of  Angus, 
called  Bdl  the  C  't ;  by  this  mai-riage  came  the  Douglasses  first  into  the  estate  of 
Glenbervie  in  the  Merns,  and  from  whom  are  descended  the  Earls  of  Angus  and 
Dukes  of  Douglas. 

This  Alexander  Barclay  sold  the  lands  of  Slains  and  Falside  in  the  Merns  to 
Andrev/  Moncur  of  Knapp,  to  whom  he  granted  a  charter  of  these  lands,  to  be 
holden  of  himself  and  his  heirs,  dated  anna  1497  ;  which  charter  we  have  in  the 
family,  as  also  a  conveyance  of  the  lands,  all  writ  and  snbscribed  with  his  own 
hand  at  Edinburgh  the  17th  day  of  March  1497,  in  which  he  obliges  himself  to 
bear  the  said  Andrew  Moncur  harmless,  both  from  his  mother,  the  above  Janet  Irvine, 
(these  lands  being,_  as  it  seems,  part  of  h,;i   jointure)   and   from  a  contract  he  nad 


240 


APPENDIX. 


entered  into  with  Sir  James  Auchterlony  of  Auchterlony  and  Kelly,  for  a  marriage 
between  his  son  George  and  Auchteilony's  daughter. 

It  was  this  same  Alexander  Barclay,  who,  being  superior  of  the  lands  of  Durn  in 
the  shire  of  Banff,  granted  to  Sir  James  Ogilvie  of  Deskford,  predecessor  to  the 
Karl  ofTindlater,  a  precept  of  clnre  constat,  as  heir  to  his  grandfather  Sir  James 
Ogilvie  of  Deskford,  for  infefting  him  in  the  lands  of  Durn :  The  original  of 
which  precept,  with  our  seal  and  arms  appended,  bearing  date  the  29th  April 
f5io,  at  Kirktonhill,  the  seat  of  the  family  of  Mathers,  is  in  the  custody  of  Sir 
James  Dunbar  of  Durn,  who  favoured  us  with  a  copy.  This  Alexander's  son's 
name  being 

XII.  George  Barclay  of  Mathers,  who  married  Marjory  Auchterlony,  daugh- 
ter to  the  above-mentioned  Sir  James  Auchterlony  of  Auchterlony  and  Kelly, 
then  a  considerable  family  in  the  shire  of  Angus ;  their  son's  name  being 

XIII.  David  Barclay  of  Mathers,  who  married  first  Mary  Rait,  daughter  to 
Rait  of  Halgreen,  by  whom  he  had  George  who  succeeded  him ;  and  had  for  his 
second  wife  Katharme  Home,  by  whom  he  had  John,  to  whom  he  gave  the  lands 
of  Johnston  in  the  Merns ;  as  is  evident  by  Barclay  of  Johnston's  first  charter, 
dated  anno  1560,  and  the  genealogy  of  his  family  in  his  own  custody.  Barclay  of 
Balmakeuan  is  a  cadet  of  Johnson's  family.  FuUarton  of  Kinnaber  married  a 
daughter  of  this  David  Barclay,  whose  eldest  son,  as  above,  was 

XIV.  George  Barclay  of  Mathers  married  first  Mary  Erskine,  daughter  to  Sir 
Thomas  Erskine  of  Brechin,  who  was  Secretary  of  State  to  King  James  V.  of  Scot- 
land; he,  or  his  immediate  successor,  exchanged  the  estate  of  Brechin  for  that  of 
Pittodrie  in  the  shire  of  Aberdeen,  his  posterity  continuing  there  a  flourishing 
family  :  For  his  second  wife  he  married  Margaret  Wood,  daughter  to  Wood  of 
Bonnyton  in  Angus,  who  bore  him  a  son,  Alexander,  to  whom  he  gave  the  lands 
of  Bridgeton  and  Jackston  in  the  Merns,  whose  lineal  heir-male,  is  George  Bar- 
clay, merchant  in  Banff.  His  eldest  son  by  Mary  Erskine  succeeding  to  the  estate, 
his  name  being 

XIV.  Thomas  Barclay  of  Mathers,  who  married  Janet  Straiton,  daughter  to 
Straiton  of  Lauriston  in  the  Merns,  a  family  eminent  both  for  its  antiquity  and 
greatness,  extinguished  only  in  our  age;  'this  Thomas  Barclay  died  before  his 
iather,  leaving  only  one  son  behind  him, 

XVI.  David  Barclay  of  Mathers,  great-grandfather  to  the  present  Barclay  of 
Urie,  born  anno  1^80.  He  married  Elizabeth  Livingston,  daughter  to  Livingston 
of  Dunipace  :  He  was  called  a  very  polite  well-bred  man  ;  but  by  the  easiness  of 
his  temper,  and  lining  much  at  Court,  he  brought  himself  into  such  difficulties 
us  obliged  him  to  sell  the  estate,  first  Mathers,  after  they  had  kept  it  near  300 
years,  and  then  the  old  estate,  after  they  had  kept  it  upwards  of  500  years.  He  had  a 
daughter,  Anne,  first  married  to  Douglas  of  Tilliquhally.by  whom  he  had  a  daugh- 
ter, grandmother  to  the  present  Hog  of  Raymore  ;  her  last  husband  was  Strachan, 
afterwards  bishop  of  Brechin.  He  had  also  several  sons,  John  and  Alexander,  both 
dying  young  and  unmarried.  Colonel  David,  of  whom  more  afterwards,  Robert, 
Rector  of  the  Scots  College  at  Paris,  and  James,  captain  of  a  troop  of  horse  in  his 
brother  David's  regiment,  killed  at  Philiphaugh,  also  unmarried,  as  they  all  were, 
except  his  son  the  above 

XVII.  Colonel  David  Barclay  of  Urie,  who  purchased  the  estate  anno  1648. 
He  was  born  at  Kirktonhill  1610,  belonging  to  his  father,  upon  the  old  estate, 
upon  some  of  which  the  servitude  had  been  granted  by  Humphry,  &-c.  to  the 
abbot  and  monks  ofsAberbrothock,  as  is  already  mentioned ;  part  of  which  they 
had  all  along  retained  until  the  year  1651,  as  appears  by  a  fitted  accompt,  attested 
by  Wishart  notar-public  and  clerk,  at  the  oversight  of  the  Viscount  of  Arbuthnot, 
Sir  Robert  Farquhar  of  Manie,  and  Sommers  of  Balyordie,  between  the  Colonel 
as  representing  his  father  David  Barclay  of  Mathers,  on  the  one  part,  and  John 
Barclay  of  Johnston,  as  having  had  the  management  of  Mather's  affairs  for  twenty 
years,  on  the  other  part.  His  decision  bears  date  at  Bervie  and  Kirk  of  Benholm, . 
from  the  21st  to  the  26th  day  of  May  1651. 

As  hath  been  already  observed,  he  purchased  Urie,  anno  1648,  from  William  Earl 
Marischal,  being  designed  in  all  the  conveyances  of  the  lands  of  Urie,  Colonel  Da- 
3 


APPENDIX.  241 

»id" Barclay,  lawful  son  of  David  Barclay  of  Mathers;  as  he  is  also  in  his  own 
contract  of  marriage,  dated  at  Bog  of  Gight  (now  Castle-Gordon)  and  Gordon- 
b.ton,  the  24th  day  of  December  1647;  ''^"'^  likewise  in  his  sister  Anne's  contract 
of  marriage  with  her  last  husband  Strachan,  afterwards  Bishop  of  Brechin,  dated 
at  Aberluthnot  the  21st  day  of  May  1649,  written  by  the  above  John  Barclay  of 
Johnston,  and  subscribed  by  David  Barclay  of  Mathers,  her  father,  and  Colonel 
David  Barclay,  her  brother,  consenters,  they  being  so  designed  in  the  paper. 
Both  these  contracts  of  marriage,  as  also  the  fitted  accompt  being  in  the  custody 
of  the  present  Barclay  of  Urie,  his  grandchild.  He  married  Katharine  Gordon, 
daughter  to  Sir  Robert  Gordon  of  Gordonston,  second  son  to  tlie  Earl  of  Suther- 
land, and  second  cousin  to  King  James  the  VI.  of  Scotland,  and  I.  of  Great  Bri- 
tain, by  his  grand  aunt  Lady  Helen  Stewart,  sister  to  Matthew  Earl  of  Lennox,  be-  . 
ing  t-lie  said  Sir  Robert's  grandmother,  his  mother  being  Lady  Jane  Gordon,  daugh- 
ter to  the  Earl  of  Huntly. 

Katharine  Gordon  bore  to  him  three  sons,  Robert,  John,  and  David,  and  two 
daughters,  Lucy  and  Jean  ;  David  and  Lucy  died  unmarried  ;  Jean  was  married 
to  Sir  Ewen  Cameron  of  Lochiel,  to  whom  she  bore  eight  children,  who  were  all 
married  ;  John  married  in  East-Jersey  in  America,  and  hath  left  children.  The 
eldest, 

XVIII.  Robert  Barclay  of  Urie,  born  anno  1648 ;  he  was  the  author  of  the  Apolo- 
gy in  behalf  of  the  people  called  Quakers,  (which  he  presented  to  King  Charles  II.) 
with  whom  he  joined  himself  about  the  19th,  and  wrote  the  Apology  in  the  27th 
year  of  his  age.  He  married  Christian  MoUison,  daughter  to  Gilbert  Mollison, 
merchant  in  Aberdeen,  by  whom  he  left  seven  children  behind  him,  three  sons, 
Robert,  David,  and  John,  and  four  daughters,  Patience,  Katharine,  Christian,  and 
Jean;  he  died  in  the  42d  year  of  his  age  at  Urie,  the  3d  of  October  1690.  All 
his  seven  children  being  at  this  time  alive,  now  about  50  years  since  he  died,  this 
being  wrote  anno  1740.  His  second  son,  David,  settled  in  London,  married  first  to 
Anne  Taylor,  daughter  to  James  Taylor,  draper  there,  and  afterwards  to  Priscilla 
Frame,  daughter  to  John  Frame,  banker  in  London,  having  children  by  both  the 
marriages.  His  eldest  son,  James,  being  also  married,  and  hath  children.  His 
third  son,  John,  settled  in  Dublin,  married  Anne  Stretell,  daughter  to  Amos  Stre- 
tell,  merchant  there.  His  daughters,  Patience  and  Katharine,  married  to  Timothy 
and  James  Forbesses,  sons  to  Alexander  Forbes  of  Aquorthies  in  the  shire  of  Aber- 
deen, and  merchants  in  Dublin.  His  third  daughter.  Christian,  married  Alexan- 
der JafFray  of  King's-wells  in  said  shire.  His  youngest,  Jean,  married  Alexander 
Forbes,  son  to  John  Forbes  of  Aquorthies,  in  the  same  shire,  merchant  in  London. 
The  eldest  son, 

XIX.  Robert  Barclay  of  Urie,  born  anno  1672;  he  married  EHzabeth  Brain, 
daughter  to  John  Brain  of  London,  merchant,  by  whom  he  had  two  sons,  Robert 
and  David,  and  three  daughters,  Mollison,  Elizabeth,  and  Katharine ;  his  son, 
David,  settled  a  merchant  in  London,  married  Mary  Pardoe,  daughter  to  John 
Pardoe  of  Worcester,  merchant.  His  daughter,  Mollison,  married  John  Double- 
day,  son  to  John  Doubleday  of  Alnwick  Abbey  in  Northumberland;  Elizabeth 
married  Sir  William  Ogilvie  of  Barras  in  the  Merns.     His  eldest  son, 

XX.  Robert  Barclay  of  Urie,  born  anno  1699,  married  one  Cameron,  daugh-- 
ter  to  Sir  Ewen  Cameron  of  Lochiel,  by  whom  he  has  four  children,  tliree  sons, , 
Robert,  David,  and  Ewen,  and  one  daughter,  Jean.     His  eldest  son, 

XXI.  Robert  Barclay  of  Urie,  born  1 731-2. 

Their  armorial  bearing  was  formerly  three  cross  patees  with  a  cheveron,  and  a . 
mitre  for  a  crest.  But  the  present  Barclay  of  Urie,  anno  1725,  after  the  example  of 
Struan  Robertson,  threw  out  the  cheveron,  as  being  by  some  thought  a  mark  of 
cadency  :  though,  as  Sir  George  Mackenzie  observes  in  his  heraldry,  it  was  an- 
ciently esteemed  an  ornament ;  so  their  present  bearing  is  azure,  three  cross  patees 
in  chief,  ardent,  with  a  dove  and  olive  branch  in  its  mouth  for  a  crest.  In  an 
escrol  above,  Cedant  anna,  and  below,  In  hac  vince.  As  extracted  from  the  Lyon's 
books,  1725. 

Vol.  1L  6  Y 


APPENDIX. 


CARNEGIE  OF  Ballindarg. 


CARNEGIE  of  Ballindarg,  his  predecessor,  was  Carnegie  of  Gallery,  now  in 
the  possession  of  Mr  Fullarton  :  Thomas  Carnegie,  the  representative  of  that  fa- 
mily, married  Margaret,  eldest  daughter  of  Alexander  Carnegie  of  Bearhill,  near 
to  Brechin  ;  their  only  son  was  John  Carnegie,  Provost  of  Forfar,  who  purchased 
the  lands  of  Ballindarg  from  Walter  Lord  Torphichen  ;  he  married  Elizabeth, 
daughter  to  John  Dickson,  merchant  in  Forfar,  their  son  Robert  Carnegie  of  Bal- 
lindarg, by  his  wife  Agnes,  daughter  to  Michael  Gray  of  Turfbeg,  was  father  to 
the  present  Robert  Carnegie  of  Ballindarg,  who  is  married  to  Anne,  daughter 
and  heiress  of  John  Carnegie  of  Kinnell.  Ballindarg's  predecessors  also  were  pos- 
sessed of  the  lands  of  Kirkton  ot  Aboyne,  now  the  property  of  Farquharson  of 
Finwean. 

Which  Robert  Carnegie's  coat  of  arms  is  matriculated  in  the  registers  of  the 
Lyon  Office,  and  is  thus  blazoned,  viz.  or,  an  eagle  displayed  azure,  holding  in  his 
dexter  talon  a  thistle,  proper  ;  crest,  a  dexter  arm  vambraced,  proper,  holding  an 
escutcheon  azure,  and  thereon  a  St  Andrew's  cross  argent;  and,  in  an  escrol  above, 
this  motto,  Loyal  in  adversity,  and  in  another  below,  Balenherd. 

James  Carnegie  of  Kinnell  was  second  son  to  Sir  John  Carnegie  of  Boysack,  and 

Margaret,  daughter  and  only  child  of Erskine  of  Dun,  by  his  first  wife, 

a  daughter  of  the  Lord  Spynie  ;  which  James  married  Anne,  eldest  daughter  to 
Sir  David  Ogilvie  of  Innerquharity  ;  their  son  John  Carnegie  of  Kinnell  married 
Anne,  daughter  and  heir  of  Archibald  Auchinleck  of  Balmanno ;  their  only  child 
Anne  Carnegie  of  Kinnell  is  married  to  Robert  Carnegie  of  Ballindarg,  as  above. 

Sir  William  Auchinleck  of  Balmanno  married  Janet,  only  child  of  Sir  Robert 
Bruce  of  Clackmanan,  by  Janet  Wardlaw,  daughter  to  the  Laird  of  Torry,  his 
first  wife ;  their  son,  Archibald  Auchinleck  of  Balmanno  married  Anne,  daughter 

to  Arnot  of  Woodmiln,  whose  only  child  and  heir,  Anne  Auchinleck, 

was  married  to  John  Carnegie  of  Kinnell,  and  their  only  child  and  heir  to  both, 
Anna  Carnegie,  is  married  to  the  said  Robert  Carnegie  of  Ballindarg. 

Michael  Gray  of  Turfbeg  was  the  second  son  of  William  Gray  of  Hayston,  by 
Elizabeth,  daughter  to  Paterson  of  Dunmure;  he  married  Jean,  daugh- 
ter to  John  Smhh  of  Glasswall;  their  son  William  married  Mary,  second  daughter 
to  Sir  David  Ogilvie  of  Innerquharity,  and  their  son,  Mr  William  Gray,  is  a  clergy- 
man. 

N.  B.  The  Grays  of  Hayston,  thereafter  designed  of  Inverichty  ;  the  Grays  of 
Invergowrie,  thereafter  designed  of  Braikie,  and  the  Grays  of  Bullion,  were  three 
brothers  by  a  second  marriage,  sons  of  the  Lord  Gray. 


Of  the  family  of  MENZIES  of  that  Ilk,  or  of  Weem. 


IT  is  the  misfortune  of  this  family  that  most  of  their  ancient  writs  were  con- 
sumed when  their  mansion-house  was  burnt  in  the  beginning  of  the  sixteenth  cen- 
tury (a),  whereby  it  is  rendered  the  more  difficult  to  discover  the  antiquity  of  it, 
seeing  most  of  our  old  records  were  destroyed  by  King  Edward  I.  when  he  over- 
run Scotland  ;  and  that  writers  and  historians  have  left  this,  among  the  many 
other  ancient  and  noted  families  in  Scotland,  mostly  in  oblivion. 

(a)  Charta  in  pub.  archiv.  Baroniffi  de  Menzies,  in  favorem  D.  Robeiti  Menzics  de  eodem,  militis, 
anno  1510. 


APPENDIX.  243 

ITie  origin  of  tliis  family,  first  called  Mttymers,  or  Mijneis,  afterwards  Md^iws 
or  Mengues,  and  now  Menzies,  according  to  the  corrupted  pronunciation  and  va- 
rious ways  of  spelling,  in  the  different  periods  of  time  in  which  they  got  their  char- 
ters and  grants,  cunnot,  for  the  reason  above  mentioned,  be  now  well  discovered, 
though  it  is  generally  thought  that  they  are  of  foreign  extract,  and  that  the  sur- 
name is  originally  the  same  with  that  of  Manners  in  England,  which  came  over  at 
the  conquest,  and  were  seated  in  Northumberland,  and  other  parts  in  the  north  of 
England,  in  the  reign  of  K-ing  Henry  II.  about  the  1 1 70 ;  and  that  soon  after  the  con- 
quest there  were  of  this  name  in  Scotland,  Boetius  and  others  affirm,  and  mention 
Mcnzies  as  a  surname  in  the  reign  of  King  Malcolm  Canmore,  when  surnames 
were  first  used  in  this  kingdom  (Z>). 

I.  The  first  of  this  name  that  is  to  be  met  with  in  any  private  grants  or  records 
in  Scotland,  is  one  Anketillus  de  Maynoers,  who  lived  in  the  reign  of  King 
William  the  Lion,  and  is  a  witness,  among  others,  to  the  donation  (c)  made  by 
IViUielmus de  Vetcre  Ponte  to  the  abbacy  of  Holyroodhouse,  of  the  lands  of  Ogleface((/), 
"  pro  salute  Domini  mei  Regis  Willielmi  et  Regime  Emergarda;." 

II.  The  next  person  of  this  name,  and  not  improbably  the  son  of  the  former,  is 
RoBEK.Trf(fMEYNERS,knight,whoflourishedinthereignof  King  Alexander  II.  and  who, 
upon  the  accession  of  King  Alexander  III.  to  the  crown,  was  promoted  to  the  office 
of  Lord  High  Chamberlain  of  Scotland  (?) ;  and  in  that  character,  as  well  as  one 
of  the  barons,  called  Magnates  Scotice,  was  employed  in  several  embassies  to  Eng- 
land, which  he  discharged  with  great  honour  and  commendation  CfJ-  This  Ro- 
bert granted  a  charter  CgJ  of  the  lands  of  Culdares,  "  Mattha:o  de  Moncrief  pro 
"  homagio  et  ser^itio  suo  ;"  the  seal  of  which  charter  is  quite  entire,  and  the  arms 
resemble  those  of  the  old  family  of  Manners  in  England  (hj,  of  which  the  family 
of  Rutland  is  descended  ■  and  this  helps  to  support  what  is  said  before  concerning 
the  affinity  betwixt  the  two  surnames ;  the  witnesses  to  this  charter  are,  among 
others,  David  de  Meyners,  and  Thomas  de  Meyners  ;  and  which  Thomas  is  a  wit- 
ness to  the  confirmation  of  the  kirk  of  Melville,  to  the  Monastery  of  Dunfermline, 
by  Gregorius  de  Melvil,  anno  1 25 1  (i).  The  above  Robert  died  in  the  year  1266 
(I),  and  left  a  son, 

III.  Sir  Alexander  de  Meyners,  Knight  (/),  who  was  one  of  those  worthy  pa- 
triots, who  stood  firm  to  the  interest  of  their  country  after  King  Alexander  III.  his 
death,  in  opposition  to  the  violent  oppressions  of  King  Edward  I.  of  England,  and 
for  which  he  was  thrown  into  prison  by  King  Edward,  as  appears  from  Rymer's 
Feed.  Vol.  II.  p.  728,  where  a  fifty  merk  land  of  old  extent  is  allotted  for  the  sub- 
sistence of  his  wife  and  children,  anno  1296.  This  Alexander  got  the  lands  Weem 
and  Aberfeldy  in  vie.  de  Perth,  from  John  de  Strathbogy  Earl  of  Athol  C'"0^  father 
of  David,  who  was  Constable  of  Scotland  in  the  beginning  of  King  Robert  I.  his 
reign.  He  was  also  possessed  of  the  lands  of  Durisdeer  in  vie.  de  Dumfries,  and 
which  he  resigned  {nj  in  favour  of  his  brother-in-law  James,  third  son  of  James* 
High  Steward  of  Scotland  ;  but  v»'hich  he  afterwards  got  back,  and  King  Robert 
I.  granted  a  charter  (oj  of  the  barony  of  Durisdeer  fpj,  to  the  said  Alexander : 
"  Tenend.  eidem  Alexandro  et  iEgidis  Senescalla?,  sponsae  suk,  de  nobis,"  &-c. 
This  Alexander  is  a  frequent  witness  in  King  Robert  I.  his  charters,  and  particu- 
larly he  is  a  witness  to  the  grant  (qj  made  to  Gilbcrtus  de  Haya,  of  the  office  of 
Lord  High  Constable  of  Scotland,  the  ninth  year  of  the  king's  reign,  anno  1315  ; 
and  it  is  observable  he  is  inserted  in  the  charter  before  Sir  Robert  Keith,  Marischal 
of  Scotland ;  from  which  it  may  be  supposed  that  at  that  time  he  enjoyed  some 


(b)  Abercromby's  History,  King  Malcolm  Canmore's  Life,  (f)  Charta  mine  penes  D.  Robertum 
Menzies  hujus  familia  principem.  (//)  Ogleface  in  vie.  de  Linlithgow,  (e)  Crawfurd's  Officers  of  State. 
(/)  Rymer's  FcEdera  Angliae.  {g)  Charta  nunc  penes  Dom.  Robertum  Menzies.  (A)  The  family  of 
Manners  bore  of  old  or,  two  bears  azure,  and  a  chief  gules,  and  the  seal  at  the  forefaid  charter  is,  or, 
one  bear  azure,  and  a  cliief  _fa/«.  How  Mr  Nisbet,  Vol.  L  p.  68,  comes  to  distinguish  betwixt  the  arms 
of  Menzies  of  that  Ilk,  and  Menzies  of  Weem,  is  not  known  ;  and  it  is  certainly  a  mistake,  for  the  fa- 
milies are,  and  always  were  the  same,  (^i)  Cartul-  Dunfermline,  (k}  Fordun's  Scotichronleon.  (/)  Charta 
penes  Dominum  Robertum  Menzies;  whereby  John  Earl  of  Athol  grants  the  landi  of  Weem,  &c.  Dom. 
Alexandro  de  Meyners,  filio  et  hsercdi  quondam  Dom.  Roberti  de  Meyners  railitis.  (m)  Ibidem. 
(/;)  Stewart's  history  of  the  Stewarts,  p.  52.  (0)  Charta  in  pub.  archivis,  (/))  This  barony  is  after- 
wards called  Enach,  in  all  the  subsequent  rights,     {f/)  Charta  penes  Comit.  de  Etrol. 


244  APPENDIX. 

place  of  considerable  rank,  otherwise  he  never  would  had  the  preference  of  the 
Marischal.  Alexander  left  issue  by  the  above  Egidia,  or  Giles  Stewart,  only 
daughter  of  James  High  Sceuard  of  Scotland  (rj. 

IV.  Sir  Robert  de  Meyners  his  successor,  who  got  in  his  father's  lifetime  from 
Robert  de  Bruce,  Dominus  de  Liddisdale,  the  lands  of  Fernauchie  and  Gowlantine, 
in  the  abthanage  or  Lordship  of  Dull,  vie.  de  Perth  fsj,  from  his  father  Sir  Alex- 
ander, wherein  he  is  designed  his  son  and  heir,  a  charter  ftj  of  the  foresaid  lands  of 
Weem  and  Aberfeldy,  and  from  David  de  Strathbogy,  Earl  of  Athol  and  Constable 
of  Scotland,  the  lands  of  the  thanage  of  Cranach,  in  vicecomitat.  predict,  fit  J.  The 
first  of  these  charters  is  confirmed  by  King  David  II.  anno  1343  C^'J  '■>  and  the  se- 
cond by  Robert,  Steward  of  Scotland,  and  Lord  oi  Kt\\o\(wJ  ;  thereafter  the  said 
Robert  got  a  charter  (^.vj  from  Duncan  Earl  of  Fife,  whereby  he  grants  to  him, 
consanguineo  nostra,  the  lands  of  Edramuckie  and  Morinch  Desewer,  in  vie.  pnedict. 
and  this  is  likewise  confirmed  by  the  said  King  David  II.  anno  1343  CyJ-  This 
Sir  Robert  married  Margaret  de  Oiiyotlj  fyvj,  one  of  the  daughters  and  heirs-por- 
tiouers  of  Sir  David  de  Ouyotb,  Knight.  This  lady  in  her  widowity,  with  consent 
ot  yobn  de  Meyners,  her  son  and  heir,  gave  (a_)  to  the  monastery  of  Dunfermline, 
"  Totam  terrain  meam  de  Pilkfuran  (Pitferran)  me  jure  hcereditano  contingentem  ;" 
and  which  charter  was  confirmed  by  King  David  JI.  mino  1360  f  AJ :  She  Hkewise 
in  her  widowity  gave  to  her  consanguineiis  Richard  Evioth  the  lands  of  Busey  in 
vie.  de  Perth  ;  and  which  was  also  confirmed  by  the  said  King  David  in  the  23d 
year  of  his  reign,  ad  annum  1362  C^J-  Of  this  marriage  there  were  two  sons,  John 
the  heir  of  the  family,  and  Alexander  de  Meyners,  de  Fothergill  (d)  ;  and  of  which 
Alexander,  who,  by  his  wife  Janet,  got  lands  in  the  shire  of  Aberdeen  in  the 
north  (e),  it  is  reckoned  the  family  of  Pitfoddles,  and  others  of  the  name  in  that 
country  are  descended. 

V.  John  succeeded  to  his  father  Sir  Robert,  in  the  whole  lands  before  mention- 
ed ;  and,  further,  got  a  giant  from  King  Robert  II.  (f)  by  which  his  majesty  gave 
to  him  and  his  heirs,  "  Ilium  annuum  redditum  octo  solidorum  nobis  debitum,  sive 
"  exeuntem  castri,  Wardae  ratione,  de  terra  de  Vogry,  inira  vicecomitat.  de  Edin- 
"  burgh."  So  that  it  would  appear,  though  there  is  no  document  extant  to  instruct 
it,  that  at  that  time  the  family  was  possessed  of  the  barony  of  Vogrie,  otherwise  there 
was  no  necessity  of  granting  them  a  discharge  of  the  castle-ward  duties  payable 
out  of  these  lands :  By  Christian  his  wife  (g),  John  left  a  son 

VI.  Robert  de  Meignes,  who  got  charters  from  King  Robert  II.  of  the  barony 
of  Enach  (/j)  in  the  shire  of  Dumfries,  the  barony  of  Vogrie  in  the  shire  of  Edin- 
burgh, the  half  of  the  barony  of  Culter  in  the  shire  of  Lanark,  and  the  lands  of 
Ceres  in  the  shire  of  Fife,  proceeding  upon  his  father  John's  resignation,  and,  as 
he  was  still  alive,  his  liferent  is  resei-ved  (2).  This  Robert  left  a  son,  David,  his 
successor,  but  what  other  children  he  had,  or  to  whom  he  was  married,  is  un- 
certain. 

VII.  Sir  David  de  Mengues,  knight,  succeeded  to  his  father  Robert  in  the 
above  lands,  and  as  the  bulk  of  his  estate  lay  then  in  Perthshire,  he  did,  conform 
to  a  charter  granted  by  King  James  I.  anno  1436,  excamb  the  barony  of  Vogrie, 
in  vice,  de  Edinb.  with  the  barony  of  Rawer,  in  vice,  de  Perth,  which  the  king 
disponed  to  him  and  his  heirs  (k)  ;  and  as  ihese  lands  were  a  part  of  the  lordship 

(r)  Stewart's  Hist,  of  the  Stewarts,  p.  52.  (s)  Charta  penes  Dom.  Robertum  Menzies.  {i)  Charta 
penes  eundem.  (a)  Ibidem,  (n)  lb.  (ui)  lb.  (a-)  Ibidem.  (_)>)  Charta  in  pub.  archivis.  (^^0  Ouyoth, 
Uyoth,  or  Evioth,  the  same  name,  and  which  family,  afterwards  called  Evioth  of  Busey,  was  of  consi- 
derable note,  and  subsisted  till  the  reign  of  King  James  VI.  that  Colin  Eviot  of  Busey  was  forfeit  for 
Cowrie's  conspiracy.  (a)  Chart,  of  Dunfermline.  (^h)  Charta  in  pub.  archiv.  (c)  Ibidem,  {d)  In 
the  charter  granted  by  the  before-mentioned  Sir  Alexander  to  Sir  Robert  his  son,  Alexander  de  Meyners 
de  Fothergill  is  called  his  grandchild,  (c)  Chart,  penes,  Mr  George  Crawfurd,  by  which  Euphemia  do- 
mina  de  Ross,  filia  et  hasres  Willielmi  Comitis  de  Ross,  confirms,  as  superior,  a  charter  granted  by  Janet 
de  Meyners,  Domina  de  Fothergill,  to  Alexander  Meyners  her  husband,  of  the  lands  of  Fcchelly  in  the 
barony  of  Kinedicard,  and  shire  of  Aberdeen,  dated  pth  March  1381.  (/_)  Charta  in  pub.  archivis. 
C^)  Cont.  penes  D.  Robertum  Menzies,  betwixt  the  said  John  and  Robert  his  son  and  heir,  anno  1395, 
whereby  Robert  becomes  bound  to  dispone  to  Christian  de  Meyners  his  mother,  the  liferent  of  the  lands 
of  Culter.  (h)  This  formerly  called  the  barony  of  Durisdeer.  (i)  Charta  in  pub.  archiv.  {i)  Charta  in 
pub.  archiv. 


APPENDIX.  245; 

of  Dull,  wherein  Q^iieen  Jean  was  secured  for  jointure,  her  majesty  ratified  (/)  the 
charter  of  excambion,  and  past  from  all  claim  she  might  have  to  the  barony  of 
Rawer.  This  Sir  David  was  one  of  the  hostages  for  King  James  l.'s  ransom  (in), 
and  is  the  same  who,  in  that  reign,  was  employed  in  several  embassies  to  the 
crown  of  Denmark,  and  made  Governor  of  the  Orkneys,  which  then  belonged  to 
the  King  of  Denmark  («).  He  married  Marjory  Sinclair,  sister  of  Henry  Earl  of 
Orkney  (o),  and  was  by  the  Earl  left  sole  tutor  to  Wdliam  Sinclair  his  son  and  heir: 
Of  this  marriage  Sir  David  had  a  son,  John,  his  successor.  Sir  David  was  married 
a  second  time  to  one  whose  name  was  Helen  {/;).  In  the  end  of  his  days  he  gave 
himself  up  to  a  religious  life,  and  became  a  monk  of  the  Sestertian  order  in  the 
monastery  of  Melrose.  He  made  several  donations  to  religious  houses ;  he  gave 
the  lands  of  Newkhill  in  Lanarkshire  to  the  monks  of  Kelso,  in  pure  alms,  "  pro 
"  salute  Jacobi  Regis  et  Jeana;  Reginae  "  (17),  which  the  king,  by  his  charter  25th 
January  143 1,  confirmed  {>■).  He  gave  also  to  the  monastery  of  Melrose  (/)  the 
third  part  of  the  lands  of  \Volfclyde,  in  the  barony  of  Culter  and  shire  of  Lanark, 
"  pro  salute  Domini  Regis  Jacobi,  et  Joannas  Regin;B,  et  pro  salute  sui,  &-c." 
and  which  donation  is  confirmed  by  the  king  (t)  in  July  143 1  ;  and  he  likewise 
gave  to  the  abbacy  of  Dunfermline  anno  1412,  "  pro  salute  animas  mea;,  et  ani- 
"  marum  parentum  meorum,&ic.  unu'iiannuum  redditum  sex  librarumet  undecim 
"  solidorum,  mihi  annuatiin  de  terris  de  Luscer-Evioth,  debitum,  et  per  me,  et 
"  predecessores  meos  hucusque  per  manus  Balivi,  qui  pro  tempore  fuerit  pra 
"  Muskilburgh  receptum,  &-c."  And  which  charter  the  said  Sir  David  afterwards, 
22d  May  1438,  with  consent  of  'John  de  Mengues,  his  son  and  heir,  confirms, 
"  Charitatis  mtuitu,  ac  pro  salute  animarum  nostrarum,  et  animarum  Marjoriae  et 
"  Helenas  uxorum  mearum,  &c."  {u).  Sir  David  left  likewise  another  son,  but 
of  which  of  his  marriages  is  uncertain  ;  his  name  was  Cudbert  (a-)  ;  he  got  a  feu 
grant  of  part  of  the  barony  of  Enach  from  John  his  brother  (y),  and  it  is  reckoned 
that  the  family  of  Enach  (z),  and  others  in  Dumfries-shire,  were  descended  of 
him. 

VIII.  John  de  Mengeis  succeeded  his  father  Sir  David,  and  got  grants  from  the 
crown  of  all  his  lands,  proceeding  upon  his  father's  resignation  («).  He  married 
Janet  Carruthers  {b),  daughter  to  Carruthers  of  Holmains  ;  he  had  three  sons, 
George,  who  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  Robert  Duncanson  of  Struan  (c), 
sans  issue.  Sir  Robert  his  successor,  and  John,  the  ancestor  of  the  family  of  Culter- 
allers  (rf). 

IX.  Sir  Robert,  the  second  son,  was,  in  the  year  1487,  retoured  heir  to  John, 
his  father,  in  the  haill  lands  before  mentioned  ;  it  was  in  this  Robert's  time  that 
the  mansion-house  of  the  family  was  burnt,  which  induced  the  sovereign  to  give 
him  a  new  grant  of  his  whole  lands  and  estate,  and  to  erect  all  of  them  into  a  free; 
barony,  to  be  called  the  Barony  of  Menzies ;  the  words  are,  "  Dilecto  nostro  Ro- 
"  berto  Menzies,  de  eodem,  militi,  pro  bono  et  gratuito  servitio,  et  quia  intelli- 
"  gimus  quod  ip.sius  Roberti  carta;  et  evidenciae  tempore  combustionis  sui  loci  de: 

(/)  Ratlficatio  penes  D.  Robertum  Menzies.  («)  Rymer's  Fuedera.  (n)  ForfeJ  Wstoria  Otcadensis. 
(5)  Com-nission  of  Baillery  by  Marjory  to  Jobn  her  son  and  heir,  and  nomination  by  Heniy  Earl  of 
Orkney,  wherein  the  Eirl  calls  S'r  Du-id  his  brother-in-law,  both  penes  de  Robertum  Menzies. 
(  /) )  Donation  to  the  monastery  of  Dunfermline  above  mentioned,  pro  salute  animarum  M.irjori^B  et 
Helence  uxorum  mearum.  {q)  Chartulary  of  Kelso.  (r)  Charta  in  pub.  archiv.  (,r)  Chartjiary  of 
Melrose.  (0  Ciarta  in  pub-  archiv.  (u)  Chartulary  of  Dunfermline,  {x)  Reversion  of  the  lands  of 
Auchintinsel  and  Duncrule  in  the  barony  of  Enach,  granted  by  the  said  Cudbert  to  John  de  Meignes, 
his  brother- german,  anno  1472.  {y)  Constat,  per  said  Reversion,  {jz)  It  is  to  be  observed.  That  be- 
fore this  period  there  are  IVJenzieses  of  Enach  mentioned  ;  but  then  these  were  always  the  eldest  sons  of 
the  family  of  Menzies,  they  were  so  stiled  till  they  got  the  estate  ;  the  predecessor  of  the  present  family 
of  Enach  was,  in  the  1603,  called  Menzies  of  Boltachan  ;  for  at  that  time  Adam  Menzies  of  Boltachaii 
got  the  superiority  of  Enach  from  Menzies  of  that  Ilk;  Charta  in  pub.  archiv.  :  ad  annum  1603,  and  from- 
thii  Adam  is  Captain  Charles  Menzies,  the  representative  of  that  family,  lineally  descended,  {a)  Char- 
ta in  pub.  archiv.  in  the  reigns  of  King  James  I.  and  II.  (b)  Mr  George  Crawfurd  has  the  voucher 
of  this  marriage.  {c^  Charta  in  pub.  archiv.  in  favour  of  the  said  George  and  Elizabeth  daughter  of 
Robert  Duncanson  of  Struan,  proceeding  upon  John  de  Meignes  the  father's  resignation,  ad  annu  n. 
{d)  Charta  penes  Robertum  Menzies  de  Culterallers  of  the  lands  of  Cultcralleis  granted  by  Sir  Robein 
Menzies,  knight,  to  John  Menzies  meo  fratri  germano,  anno  15 10. 

Vol.,  II.  G  7, 


246  APPENDIX. 

"  Weem,  per  malefactorcs  combust,  et  destruct.  fuevunt,  &c."  (e).  This  Sir 
Robert  married  Margaret  Lindsay',  daughter  of  Sir  David  Lindsay  ot  Edziell  (/), 
and  left  issue  three  sons,  Sir  Robert  his  successor,  Wilham  Menzies  of  Roro,  ances- 
tor of  the  family  of  Shian  (^),  and  Alexander  (Z)),  and  a  daughter,  Margaret,  mar- 
ried to  William  Robertson  oi:  Struan  (/). 

X.  Sir  Robert,  in  the  year  1520,  was  retoured  heir  to  his  father  in  the  estate 
of  Menzies  (k)  ;  he  married  first  Christian  Gordon,  eldest  daughter  of  Alexander 
Earl  of  Huntly,  by  Jean  Stewart,  daughter  of  John  Earl  of  Athol  (/),  by  whom 
lie  had  Alexander  his  successor;  and  afterwards  he  married  Marion  Campbell, 
daughter  of  Archibald  Earl  of  Argyle  (;«)  ;  but  of  this  last  marriage  there  does 
not  appear  to  have  been  any  issue. 

XI.  Alexander,  anno  1557,  was  retoured  heir  to  his  father  in  the  above  estate 
of  Menzies  («)  ;  he  married  first  Janet  Campbell,  daughter  of  Sir  James  Campbell 
of  Lawers  (0),  by  whom  he  had  a  son,  James ;  and  afterwards  he  married  Katha- 
rine M'Ghie  (p),  by  whom  he  had  three  sons,  George,  Mr  James,  the  ancestor  of 
the  family  of  Culdares,  and  Thomas  (q). 

XII.  James  succeeded  Alexander  his  father,  and  married  Barbara  Stewart  (r), 
eldest  daughter  of  John  Earl  of  Athol,  by  Jean,  daughter  of  John  Lord  For- 
bes (j)  ;  he  left  two  sons,  Alexander  his  successor,  and  Duncan  Menzies  of 
Comrie  (t)  ;  likwise  two  daughters,  Helen,  married  to  James  Beaton  of  Me- 
gum  (?/),  and  Grizel,  married  to  Mr  James  Grant  of  Ardmilly,  brother-german  to 
John  Grant  of  Freuchie  (v),  ancestor  to  the  Laird  of  Grant  (w). 

XIII.  Alexander,  afterwards  Sir  Alexander,  was  in  the  year  1588  retoured  heir 
to  his  father  James  (x).  He  married,  first,  Margaret  Campbell,  daughter  of  Sir 
Duncan  Campbell  of  Glenorchy  (y),  s/ins  issue  ;  thereafter  he  married  Elizabeth, 
daughter  of  Sir  John  Forrester  of  Garden  (z),  by  Margaret,  daughter  of  John 
Earl  of  Wigton,  by  whom  he  had  a  son,  John  (a),  who  died  without  issue,  and 
Duncan,  who  succeeded  to  his  brother.  Sir  Alexander  afterwards  married  Marjory 
Campbell,  daughter  of  Alexander,  Bishop  of  Brechin  [b),  of  which  last  mar- 
riage he  had  seven  sons,  Alexander  Menzies  of  Rotmell,  of  whom  there  are  de- 
scendants still  alive;  William  Menzies  of  Carse,  of  whom  there  are  likewise  de- 
scendants ;  Thomas  Menzies  of  Inchaffray,  Robert  Menzies  of  Classic,  George,  Da- 
vid, and  Mr  Archibald,  who  was  a  Writer  to  tlie  Signet ;  but  of  these  five  there 
are  no  descendants  alive  (r).  He  had  likewise  of  this  marriage  four  daughters, 
Helen,  married  to  Sir  James  Campbell  of  Lawers  (d),  Grissel,  to  Sir  Thomas 
Stewart  of  GrandtuUy  {^),  Margaret,  to  Colin  Campbell  of  Bowhastle,  second  son 
to  the  Laird  of  Glenorchy  (/),  and  Jean,  married  to  Alexander  Robertson  of 
Lude  (^). 


(e)  Charta  in  pub.  arcliiv.  1 510  before  mentioned.  (_/")  This  Sir  David  had  another  daughter  mar- 
ried to  Ruthven  of  that  Ilk,  ancestor  of  the  Lord  Ruthven.  (^)  Assignation  granted  by  William 
Menzies  of  Roro  to  Sir  Robert  his  father,  8th  March  1 5  20.  (A)  Alexander  had  a  son,  John,  who  got, 
7th  July  1546,  a  charter  of  Tegramuch  from  his  uncle  Sir  Robert ;  he  is  called  Joanni  filio  Alcxandrl 
Menzies  fratris  mei.  (  z')  Con.  of  Mar.  penes  Dom.  Robertum  Menzies.  (^t)  Retour  penes  eundem. 
r/)  Con.  of  Mar,  byway  of  indenture  betwixt  Sir  Robert  Menzies,  knight,  in  behalf  of  Robert  the 
son,  and  the  Earl  in  behalf  of  his  daughter,  22d  Nov.  i  <;o3.  (;«)  Con.  of  Mar.  penes  eundem,  8th 
Decern.  1526,  Janet  Countess,  of  Athol,  Sir  John  Campbell  of  Calder,  and  Archibald  Campbell  of 
Skipnach,  are  burden-takers  for  the  bride,  and  oblige  them  to  pay  600  nierks  of  tocher.  («)  Retour 
penes  eundem.  (0)  Con.  of  Mar.  penes  eundem.  (/>)  Con.  penes  eundem.  (y)  Latter-will  and 
testament  of  Alexander  Menzies  of  that  Ilk,  penes  Jacobum  Menzies  de  Culdares.  (r)  Con.  of  Mar. 
penes  Dom.  Robertum  M'-nzics.  (,r)  Stewart's  History  of  the  Stewarts'  family  of  Athol.  (/)  Charta 
de  Comrie  penes  Dom.  Robertum  Menzies,  of  this  family  of  Comrie  is  lineally  descended  Captain  John 
Menzies.  (a)  Discharge  of  Tocher,  penes  Dom.  Robertum  Menzies.  (v)  Con.  of  Mar.  penes  eundem. 
(ui)  The  Lairds  of  Grant,  till  of  late,  were  called  Grants  of  Freuchie.  (.v)  Retour  penes  Dom.  Rober- 
tum Menzies.  (y)  Genealogy  of  the  family  of  Glenorchy.  (a)  Charta  in  pub.  archiv.  ad  annum  1603. 
(a)  The  above  cliarter  1603,  wherein  John,  eldest  son  and  heir  of  the  said  Sir  Alexander,  procreated 
betwixt  him  and  Elizabeth  Forrester,  is  provided  to  the  fee  of  the  estate.  (/>)  Contract  of  mar.  penes 
Dominum  Robertum  Menzies.  This  Marjory  had  a  sister,  Margaret,  married  to  Sir  John  Hamilton  of 
Litterick,  ancestor  to  the  family  of  Bargcny.  Craw.  Peerage.  (c)  Test,  of  Sir  Alexander  Menzies,. 
penes  Dom.  Robertum  Menzies.     (i^J  Contract  of  mar,  penes  eundem.     (c)  Ibid.     (/)  Ibid,     (f)   Ibid.. 


API^ENDIX..  ^47 

XIV.  DuNC.\N  succeeded  to  his  father,  and  was,  in  the  1624,  retouvcd  heir  to  John 
.'lis  brother,  in  such  parts  of  his  estate  as  he  died  in  tlie  fee  of  (,•;).  He  married  fean 
Le':hc.  >>nly  daughter  of  James,  Master  of  Rotlies  (/)),  by  Kalliarine,  daughter  of 
Patrick  Lord  Diummond;  of  which  marriage  Duncan  had  three  sons,  Alexander,, 
h'-    accessor,  Robert,  who  died  witliout  issue,  and  W'ilham  (<),  who  was  killed  at 

th  ■  battle  of  Worcester;  and  five  daughters,  iNIarjory,  married  to Trotter, 

m^iciiant  in  Portugal  {d),  Jean,  married  to  Mr  Robert  Campbell  of  Finnab  (c),  Eli- 
zabrrh  to  xVlexander  M'Nab  of  that  Ilk  {/■),  Margaret,  to  Alexander  Stewart  of 
Toss  (^),  and  Helen,  who  died  unmarried  (/»).  • 

XV.  Alexander  succeeded  to  his  father  Duncan,  and  was  created  a  Knight  Ba- 
ronet 2d  September  1665  (/)  ;  the  words  of  the  patent  are,  "  In  memoriam  revo- 
"  cantes  multa  praclara  servitia  nobis,  nostrisque  ilhistrissimis  progenitoribus, 
"  per  dilectum  nostrum  Dominum  Alexandrum  Menzies  de  eodem,  equitetn  au- 
"  ratum,  ejusque  praedecessores,  pnestita  &.  peracta,  et  gravia  damna  iis  iilata. 
"  Quinetiam,  eum  esse  philarchum  &  principem  clarae  familia;  cognomine  Men- 
"  zies„  in  hoc  regno  nostro  Scotiae,  Sj-c."  He  married  Agnes  Campbell  (,(),  eldest 
dau.;Uter  of  Sir  John  Campbell  of  Glenorchy,  by  Mary,  daughter  of  William  Earl 
01  \irth  and  Monteith  (')  ;  of  which  marriage  he  had  two  sons,  Robert,  his  heir, 
a:  !  Captain  James  Menzies,  who  is  still  alive  (-n) ;  and  three  daughters,  Susan, 
married  first  to  Lord  Neil  Campbell,  second  son  to  Archibald  Marquis  of  Argyie, 
and  afterwards  to  Col.  Alexander  Campbell  of  Fiiinab ;  Jean,  married  to  Mungo 
Can  obeli  of  Netherplace,  and  Emilia  to  Thomas  Fleming  of  Moness. 

XVI.  Robert  Menzies,  Fiar  of  Menzies,  for  his  father  Su-  Alexander  survived 
hiin,  made  an  early  appearance  at  the  late  revolution,  and  had  not  fate  cut  him 
off  in  the  flower  of  his  age,  would  have  made  a  considerable  figure,  he  being  a 
gentleman  of  great  parts  and  influence.  He  married  Anne  Sandilands,  daughter 
of  Walter  Lord  Torphichen,  by  Katharine,  daughter  of  William  Lord  Alexander 
eldest  son  of  William  Earl  of  Stirling.  He  died  in  the  year  1691,  leaving  issue 
two  sons.  Sir  Alexander,  his  heir,  and  James,  who  died  young  sans  issue  ;  and 
two  daughters,  Christian,  first  married  to  Patrick  Stewart  of  Eallechan,  and  after- 
wards to  John  Farquharson  of  Invercauld;  but  of  neither  of  these  marriages  are 
there  issue  surviving;  and  Katharine  married  to  John  Menzies,  M.  D.  of  the  fami- 
ly of  Culterallers,  of  whom  there  is  issue. 

XVII.  Sir  Alexander,  son  of  the  said  Sir  Robert,  who  succeeded  to  the  estate 
after  his  grandfather's  death,  married  his  own  cousin-german,  Christian,  daughter 
of  Lord  Neil  Campbell,  by  Susan  Menzies  his  second  wife,  by  whom  he  left  Sir 
Robert  his  successor,  and  a  daughter,  Christian,  who  was  married  to  William 
Macintosh  of  that  Ilk,  Esq.  but  of  whom  there  is  no  surviving  issue. 

XVIII.  Sir  Robert  succeeded  his  father,  and  presently  enjoys  the  estate  of  his  an- 
cestors,  he  is  married  to  the  Lady  Mary  Stewart,  eldest  daughter  of  James  Earl  of 
Bute,  by  Lady  Anne  Campbell,  daughter  of  Archibald  Duke  of  Argyie. 

The  armorial  bearing  of  this  family  is  argent,  a  chief  gules  ;  crest,  a  Saracen's 
head  erazed,  proper;  supporters,  two  savages;  and  moito.  Will  God  I  shall. 


(a)  Retour.  (4)  Cont.  mar.  (c)  Duncan's  Latter-will.  (//)  Disch.  of  Tocher,  penes  eundem.  (f)  Con. . 
raar.  penes  eunde  n.  (/)  Ibid,  (g)  Ih'i.  {h)  The  Tesiament  above  mentioned.  (/)  Patent  penes 
Dom.  Robertum  Menzies,  et  in  puj.  archiv.  {t)  Con.  mar.  penes  eundem.  (/)  Genealoijv  of  the  family 
of  G'lenorchy.  ("i^  Capt,in  Menzies  .carried  Anna  Campbell,  .daughter  to  Lord  Nell  Campbell  bv  Lady 
Vcr  Ker  his  fii't  r.-i'e,  an:t  has  Issue  four  sons,  John,  Jrmie-,  Neil,  and  Duncan,  and  several  daughtt'rs,  one 
married  to  Jities  Stewart  of  Killichassj',  one  to  Robert  Fleming  of  Moness,  and  one  to  Lieutenant  Tohn^ 
M-iCenzie  of  Kincraig,  &c. 

3 


24b.  APPENDIX. 


VANS  OF  Barnbaroch. 


THE  leariied  antiquary  and  historian  Sir  James  Dalrymple  (a)  observes,  That 
die  anciegt  surname  of  Vans,  in  Latin  charters  called  de  Fallibus,  is  the  same  with 
the  name  of  Vaux  in  England,  and  is  one  of  the  first  surnames  that  appears  there 
after  the  conquest.  One  of  the  family  came  to  Scotland  in  the  time  of  King  Da- 
vid I. ;  and  in  the  reign  of  his  grandson  and  successor  Malcolm  IV.  mention  is  made 
of  Philip  de  Vedlibus,  who  had  possessions  in  the  south  on  the  border  ;  and  soon 
after  that  we  find  the  family  of  the  lal/ibus  or  Fans,  proprietors  of  the  lands  and 
barony  of  Dirleton  in  East-Lothian.  'Joannes  de  Vallibus,  Dominus  de  Dirletoun, 
gave  in  pure  and  perpetual  alms  to  the  Episcopal  See  of  Glasgow,  dece7n  marcas  de 
firmis  terra:  Slice  de  Golyn  (6);  dated  apud  Edinburgh  i8th  April  1249;  which  is  ra- 
tified by  King  Alexander  IIL  the  4th  of  June,  the  29th  year  of  his  reign  [c).  He 
was  succeeded  by 

Sir  Alexander  de  Vallibus  his  son,  who  is  designed  filius  Joannis  de  Vallibus, 
militis,  who  exchanges  the  annuity  out  of  the  lands  of  Golyn,  given  to  the  Metro- 
poHtan  Church  of  Glasgow  by  his  father,  for  the  same  ten  merks  to  Ise  uphfted 
out  of  his  mill  of  Haddington.  The  deed  bears  date  at  Glasgow,  i^tio  Kalendas 
Decembris  1267  {d).  He  was  succeeded  by  ^.nothev  Joannes  de  Vallibus,  Ikiminus  de 
Dirletoun,  who  ratifies  and  confirms  to  the  church  of  Glasgow  the  deed  of  Sir  John 
his  grandfaiher,  dated  in  Capitulo  Ecclesia  Glasguen.  the  8th  of  February  1305  {e). 
The  family  of  the  Vans,  or  de  Vallibus  of  Dirleton,  flourished  down  in  the  male- 
line  till  the  reign  of  Robert  IL  that  it  came  to  terminate  in  an  heir-female,  who 
was  married  to  John  Halyburton,  son  to  Sir  Walter,  and  brother  to  another  Sir 
Walter  Halyburton  of  that  Ilk,  who  thereupon  assumed  the  title,  and  carried  the 
arms  of  the  Vanses,  viz.  argent,  a  bend  azure,  in  his  achievement,  and  which  was 
borne  quarterly  in  the  arms  of  the  Lord  Halyburton  of  Dirleton,  so  long  as  the 
family  subsisted.  There  is  a  charter  ffj  granted  by  Henricus  de  Sancto  Clara, 
Comes  Orkadice,  ac  Djminus  de  Roslyn,  Jacobo  de  Sancto  Claro  Domino  de  Longfor- 
macus,  dated  the  22d  of  June  1384,  to  which  there  are  witnesses,  Thoma  de  Ers- 
kine  de  Dun,  Georgia  de  Abernetijy  de  Saiilton,  Waltero  Haliburton  de  eodem,  et  Jo- 
anne de  Haliburton  de  Dirletoun,  militibus.  This  Sir  John  Halyburton  of  Dirleton, 
by  the  heir-general  of  the  family  of  the  Vanies  of  Dirleton  aforesaid,  had  a  son, 
Sir  Walter  Halyburton  of  Dirleton,  who  succeeded  his  uncle  in  the  estate  and  ba- 
rony of  Halyburton,  and  is  upon  that  designed  in  several  authentic  deeds  still  extant 
(jr).  IVat'-i  us  de  Haliburton,  dominus  ejusdem,  et  de  Dirletoun;  and,  as  the  family  of 
Halyburton  carried  the  arms  of  the  Vanses  quartered  with  their  own,  so  for  some 
time  did  ail  the  three  families  that  married  the  daughters  and  co-heirs  of  Patrick  the 
last  Lord  Halyburton  of  Dirleton  carry  the  coat  of  arms  of  the  Vanses  of 
Dirleton,  quartered  in  their  several  achievements,  viz.  the  Lord  Ruthven,  who  was 
afterwards  Earl  of  Gowrie,  the  Lord  Home,  and  Kerr  of  Faudinside. 

The  only  remaining  heirs-male  of  the  ancient  family  of  the  Vanses  of  Dirleton 
were  the  Vanses  of  Barnbaroch,  in  the  county  of  Wigton,  who  carry  the  bend  for 
their  arms,  the  principal  figure  of  the  coat  of  the  Vanses,  and  charge  the  bend  with 
a  mullet,  intimating  that  they  were  a  younger  son  of  the  House  of  Dirleton.  But 
now,  since  they  represent  the  principal  family,  by  the  rules  and  maxims  that  are 
hid  down  in  heraldry,  they  may  strike  out  the  mullet,  the  brotherly  difference,  and- 
wear  and  carry  the  bend-simple,  as  they  have  done  for  some  centuries. 

The  original  ancestor  of  the  Vanses  of  Barnbaroch,  who  was  a  younger  son  of 
the  Vanses  of  Dirleton,  got  the  lands  of  Barnbaroch  from  the  Earls  of  Douglas, 
while  they  had  the  lordship  of  Galloway,  which  might  be  soon  after  that  Sir  Archi- 

(a)  Appendi.x  to  the  Collections  relating  to  the  Scots  History.  {h)  Excerpts  from  the  Chartulary  of 
Glasgow  in  the  Lawjiers'  Library.  (r)  Ibidem.  U)  Ibidem,  U.)  Ibidem,  (f)  Penes  Dom.  Robert. 
Sinclair  de  Longformacus,  Baronet,     {g)  Writs  in  the  hands  of  the  Earl  of  Buchan. 


APPENDIX.  249 

bald  Douglas  got  that  great  lordship  in  the  reign  of  King  Robert  II.  that  we  find 
him  desigiied,  from  authentic  and  clear  vouchers,  Domi/ius  Giiluidia:;  and  even 
after  the  ijSS,  that  he  comes  to  tiie  succession  of  the  earldom  of  Douglas,  he  stiles 
\mr\se\t'  Copies  de  Do!/j[/as,  fic  Dominiis  G(i/u/ili,v(,;),  as  did  also  his  successors ;  for, 
although  the  Vanses  of  Barnbaroch  had  been  long  vassals  to  the  luirls  of  Douglas, 
yet,  what  by  tiie  teuds  that  were  common  in  the  more  ancient  times,  what  by 
Other  accidents  that  have  befallen  the  archives  of  other  ancient  famihes,  as  well  as 
this  of  the  Vanses  of  Barnbaroch,  they  have  no  charters  in  their  custody  preceding 
the  reign  of  K.ing  James  U.  for  then  they  have  a  charter  granted  by  IVillielmus 
Comes  de  Douglas,  vi"  Domiiius  Galuidia,  dilecto  armigeirj  suo  Roberto  I  'mis,  dc  tcrris 
de  Bainglass  is'  Banibarroch,  and  many  other  lands,  hitredibus  stiis  Isi  assijf/uitis, 
data  26th  January  145 1  (i);  which  charter  is  ratified  and  confirmed  by  a  charter 
under  the  Great  Seal,  the  13th  of  August  the  same  year.  But,  though  the  family 
of  Barnbaroch  have  no  older  charters  now  in  their  custody,  yet  it  is  plain  and 
e\  ident,  that  the  Vanses  of  this  house  had  subsisted  long  before  that ;  for  a  younger 
brother  of  the  family,  Mr  George  Vans,  Dean  of  Glasgow,  was  Secretary  of  State 
to  King  James  II.  (c).  This  Robert  Vans  of  Barnbaroch,  aforesaid,  was  succeed- 
ed by  Blanse  Vans  of  Barnbaroch,  his  son  and  heir;  and  he  had  also  a  younger 
son,  George,  Bishop  of  Galloway.  There  is  a  charter  by  King  James  II.  to  Blanse 
Vans,  son  and  heir  apparent  of  Robert  Vans  of  Barnbaroch,  of  the  lands  of  Barn- 
glass  and  Barnbaroch,  &.c.;  in  the  resignation  of  his  father  the  lands  are  provided 
to  the  heirs-male  of  Blanse  nominatim;  and  failing  these,  to  several  other  collate- 
ral heirs-male  carrying  the  surname  of  Vans.  The  charter  is  dated  at  Kirkcud- 
bright the  8th  of  March  1458  {d);  this  was  when  the  sovereign  came  to  have  the 
lordship  of  Galloway  in  the  forfeiture  of  the  Earl  of  Douglas.  This  Blanse  was 
succeeded  by 

Patrick  Vans  of  Barnbaroch,  his  son,  who  has  a  charter  of  conjunct  infeftment 
to  himself  and  Margaret  Kennedy,  his  spouse,  of  several  lands  which  he  held  of 
the  crown  in  the  1498  (^e).     He  was  succeeded  by 

Alexander  Vans  of  Barnbaroch,  his  son  and  heir,  who  resigns  the  lands  of 
Kirkwonask  in  favour  of  xvlr  Patrick  Vans  of  Westraw,  as  from  the  instrument  in  the 
resignation,  still  extant,  dated  the  nth  June  1508  (/).  This  Alexander  Vans  of 
Barnbaroch  was  succeeded  by 

John  Vans  of  Barnbaroch,  his  son  and  heir,  who  had  a  grant  by  charter  from 
Patrick  Vans  of  Whitehalls,  of  the  lands  of  Dunjargan,  dated  the  9th  of  August 
1535,  which  is  confirmed  by  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal  of  King  James  V. 
bearing  date  the  3d  of  February  1537.  He  married  Janet  Kennedy  (^_),  daughter 
to  the  Earl  of  Cassilis,  and  had  Alexander,  his  successor,  and  Patrick,  who  succeed- 
ed his  brother  in  the  estate. 

This  Alexander  Vans  of  Barnbaroch  married  Euphame,  daughter  of  Sir  John 
Dunbar  of  Mochrum;  but  he  dying  without  issue-male,  was  succeeded  by  his 
brother  nnd  heir-male, 

Mr  Patrick  Vans  of  Barnbaroch,  who  was  a  gentleman  of  reputation  for  parts 
and  integrity.  During  the  heat  of  the  civil  war  this  gentleman  was  solicited  with 
the  greatest  earnestness  by  the  two  contending  parties;  those  who  appeared  for 
the  young  king,  and  both  the  oueen  herself,  and  the  regents  who  supported  the 
young  king,  wrote  him  letters  of  solicitation  to  come  over  to  their  side,  judging  it 
of  no  small  consequence  to  which  of  the  parties  he  attached  and  joined  himself: 
However,  he  sided  with  the  king's  party,  and  was  thereupon  named  one  of  the 
Privy  Council  and  Exchequer,  and  one  of  the  Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice  in 
the  1582  {b).  In  the  1587  he  was  joined  in  commission  with  Mr  Peter  Young  of 
Seaton,  in  an  embassy  to  Denmark,  where  he  discharged  his  negociation  with  ho- 
nour and  success.  Upon  his  return  he  made  the  first  proposal  to  the  king  of  the 
Princess  of  Denmark,  as  a  proper  spouse  for  his  majesty;  and  when  the  king  went 

(fl)  Charters  in  the  public  records.  {b)  Charter  in  the  charter-chest  of  the  family.  (c)  Lives  of 
Officers  of  State.  (d)  Charter  in  the  charter-chest  of  the  family.  (f)  Charter  under  the  Great  Seal 
in  the  records.  (^f)  Writ  in  the  archives  of  the  family,  {g)  Historical  and  Genealogical  Account  of 
the  family  of  Cassilis,  JVISS.     (h)  All  this  appears  from  original  letters  still  preserved  in  the  family. 

Vol.  n.  7  A 


,30  APPENDIX. 

to  Denmark  in  person  to  espouse  the  princess,  he  had  the  honour  to  attend  liis 
majesty  to  Upsal,  where  the  marriage  was  happily  solemnized ;  at  which  time  he 
got  a  charter  of  his  estate  in  liferent,  and  the  patronages  of  the  churches  of  Wig- 
ton  and  Colmonell,  and  Kirkcowen,  and  to  John  Vans,  his  son  and  apparent  hen-, 
jn  fee,  dated  at  Upsal  the  last  of  November  1589,  which  is  confirmed  by  the 
Scottish  Parliament;  and  in  the  preamble  to  the  charter  Sir  Patrick's  great  merit 
and  services  are  very  honourably  set  forth  {a).  This  Sir  Patrick  Vans  of  Barn- 
baroch  married  Katharine  Kennedy,  daughter  to  the  Earl  of  Cassihs,  by  whom  he 
had  Sir  John  Vans,  his  son  and  heir,  who  was  of  the  Privy  Chamber  to  King 
James  VI. ;  and,  being  in  a  good  degree  of  favour  with  that  prince,  he  had  a  grant 
of  the  estate  of  Longcastle  in  Ireland,  of  considerable  value;  and  upon  that,  in  his 
father's  lifetime,  he  was  designed  by  the  title  of  Longcastle.  He  married  Mar- 
garet, daughter  of  Uthred  M'Dowall  of  Garthland  (b),  and  had  by  her  Patrick,  his 
son  and  heir  apparent,  who  married  Grissel,  daughter  of  John  Johnstone  of  that  ilk, 
then  Lord  Hartfield,  ancestor  to  the  present  Marquis  of  Annandale,  by  Margaret 
his  wife,  daughter  of  Sir  Walter  Scott  of  Buccleugh(t),  ancestorto  the  present  Duke 
of  Buccleugh,  by  whom  he  had  John,  his  son  and  iieir  apparent,  in  whose  favour 
Sir  John,  his  grandfather,  resigns  the  fee  of  the  whole  estate,  dated  the  30th  of  Ja- 
nuary 1640  (^).  The  same  Sir  Patrick  Vans  of  Barnbaroch,  with  consent  of  his 
father.  Sir  John  Vans  of  Barnbaroch,  provides  his  second  son,  Alexander  Vans,  in 
the  lands  of  Barqnhanny,  by  his  charter  dated  the  15th  of  February  1640  (e). 
This  Sir  Patrick  Vans  of  Barnbaroch  was  succeeded  by 

John  Vans  of  Barnbaroch,  his  son,  who  married  Grissel,  daughter  of  John 
M'CuUoch  of  Myrton:  but  he  dying  without  is.ue-male,  was  succeeded  by  Cap- 
tain Alexander  Vans  of  Barquhanny,  his  brother-german.  He  married  Margaret, 
daughter  of  William  Maxwell  of  Monreith,  by  whom  he  had  Colonel  Patrick 
Vans  of  Barnbaroch,  who  was  member  of  Parliament  for  the  burgh  of  Wigton, 
and  the  districts  thereof.  He  married,  first,  Jean,  daughter  of  Sir  James  Campbell 
of  Lawers,  by  whom  he  had  Patrick  Vans,  Esq.  his  eldest  son,  and  a  daughter, 
Agnes,  who  was  married  to  James  Brown  of  Carsluth,  now  both  alive.  He  mar- 
ried, next,  Barbara,  daughter  of  Patrick  M'Dowall  of  Freugh ;  and  dying  on 
the  27th  of  January  1733,  left  issue,  by  his  wife  foresaid,  two  sons,  John  and  Alex- 
ander, and  three  daughters,  all  yet  alive  ; 

Barbara,  Anne,  Elizabeth. 

The  armorial  bearing  of  this  ancient  family  is  ardent,  a  bend  azure,  as  in  the 
First  Volume  of  this  work:  The  author  has  only  there  taken  notice  of  the  crest 
and  mottb,  which  is  a  lion  rampant,  holding  in  his  dexter  paw  a  pair  of  balances, 
proper:  But  from  the  attestation  of  two  gentlemen,  of  undoubted  credit  and  re- 
putation, the  coat  of  arms  of  the  family,  as  it  stands  engraved  on  the  old  House  of 
Barnbaroch,  is  supported  by  two  savages,  with  clubs  in  their  hands,  and  wreathed 
about  the  middle  with  laurel :  crest  and  motto  as  in  the  First  Volume. 


M'DOWALL  OF  Freugh. 


IT  is  agreed  on  by  all  our  modern  antiquaries,  that  all  the  familiesof  the  M'Dowalls 
are  branched  from  the  great  Lords  of  Galloway,  who  appear  to  be  great  men  as 
soon  as  we  have  the  authority  of  charters  or  records  to  rely  on.  Mr  Nis- 
bet,  in  his  Treatise  of  Heraldry,  or  some  other  in  his  name,  has  made  a  kind  of 
dissertation  on  the  three  families  of  the  M'Dowalls  in  the  county  of  Wigton : 
But  it  is  obvious  this  is  done  in  such  a  manner,  that  sometimes  it  would  seem  the 
author  is  not  serious,  and  has  rather  embarrassed  than  cleared  up  the  origin  either 

(a)  Charter  in  the  custody  of  the  family,  (i)  Ibidem,  charter  under  the  Great  Seal  to  Sir  John  Vans 
of  Barnbaroch,  and  Margaret  M'Dowall  his  spouse,  12th  March  1608.  (c)  Collections  relating  to  the 
family  of  Johnstone,  MSS.     (</)  Charta  penes  the  family  of  Vans,     (f)  Ibidem. 


APPENDIX.  1^. 

af  tlie  House  of  Freujrh,  or  the  othev  two,  who  all  three  set  up  on  a  footing  of  i^ 
dependency  of  one  another.  Frcugh,  in  that  Treatise,  is  treated  by  the  author  in 
a  very  abusive  manner,  and  is  run  down  at  a  terrible  rate.  1  can  see  no  ground  for 
all  this,  unless  it  be  a  pedigree  and  line  of  descent  of  the  M'Dowalls  of  Freugh, 
drawn  up  b3'  some  very  unskilful  liund,  that  Mr  Nisbet  pretended  bad  been  sent 
him,  and  founded  upon  a  very  wild  conceit,  that  the  Ein-ls  of  Carrick,  as  well  as 
the  Lords  of  Galloway,  were  anciently  of  tire  surname  of  iVl'Dowall  ;  whereas  it  is 
evident,  beyond  the  possibility  of  cavil  or  contradiction,  that  the  surname  they 
used  was  territorial,  rfc  Gallouyia  {<i).  And  the  Eiirls  of  Cai-rick,  though  they 
were  a  branch  ot  the  House  of  Galloway,  yet  when  they  got  the  lands  of  Carrick, 
they,  as  was  the  usual  custom  of  the  time,  surnamed  themselves  (^/^  Ci/n/r/i  (/ii); 
so  tliere  is  not  the  least  vestige  that  ever  they  had  the  surname  of  M-DowaU,  or 
any  thing  like  it.  Ulgerick  and  Douenald  were  the  leaders,  and  no  question  the 
Lords  of  Galloway  in  the  reign  of  King  David  1.  They  were  botli  slain  in  their 
country's  service  at  the  battle  of  Allerton,  against  the  English,  anno  1138  (f); 
they  seem  to  be  brothers.  From  Douenald,  or  B'jucgald,  the  iVl'Dowalls  or  M'Dou- 
galls,  as  they  are  called  in  the  more  ancient  writs,  are  sprung.  The  surname  inti- 
mates that  they  are  the  oftspring  and  descendants  of  Dougal,  or  Dungald,  which  is 
one  and  the  same.  In  this  Appendix  M'Dowall  of  Freugh,  we  say,  is  run  down 
at  an  odd  rate,  with  a  view  to  raise  and  exalt  the  other  two  competing  families. 
Freugh  has  no  mind  to  retaliate  that  way  ;  he  thinks  that  far  below  him;  he 
frankly  acknowledges  the  other  two  families,  as  well  as  he  himself,  are  descendants 
and  branches  of  the  Galloway  family;  all  he  intends  is  to  do  justice  to  himself,  and 
to  rescue  his  family  from  the  load  of  infamy  Mr  Nisbet,  or  some  other  in  his  name, 
has  endeavoured  to  throw  on  it,  without  any  ground  or  provocation  given  by 
him  for  such  a  severe  treatment:  Retaliations  of  that  kind  never  do  any  good,  nor 
is  any  thing  said  in  such  a  way  much  minded;  that  rather  exposes  all  competitors 
and  competitions  of  that  kind  to  the  ridicule  and  diversion  of  all  sober  men.  This 
is  obvious,  and  so  generally  acknowledged  to  be  true,  that  we  need  insist  no  longer 
in  a  matter  that  is  so  well  known. 

The  fust  time  the  surra'-^e  of  M'Dowall  or  M'Dougall  is  found  in  any  authen- 
tic voucher  or  record,  is  in  that  deed  of  submission  and  fealty  that  was  so  univer- 
sally gone  into  by  the  Scots  nation,  whereby  they  acknowledged  King  Edward  I. 
of  England  as  direct  superior  Lord  of  the  kingdom  of  Scotland,  anno  1296:  there 
are  two  gentlemen  of  the  name  there,  Dougall  M-Dougall,  and  Fergus  M'Dougall, 
Dd  Count  de  Uli^ioun  (d),  which  gives  the  M'Dowalls  a  claim  to  a  very  high  anti- 
quity. There  is  soon  after  this  a  Fer^ush/s  M'Douall  in  the  records,  and  in  the 
Feedera;  and  the  truth  is,  these  M'Dowalls  are  applicable  to  be  the  ancestors  of  all 
the  three  competitors,  Freugh,  Garthland,  and  Logan.  After  them  there  is  a 
Dougall  M'Dougall,  Gallovidianus,  who  was  a  man  of  such  eminency  in  Galloway 
that  he  was  like  to  turn  very  troublesome  to  King  David  Bruce;  he,  it  seems,  in- 
tended to  set  up  for  independency,  which  threatened  the  peace  of  the  country, 
and  was  like  to  grow  up  to  a  rebellion;  but  his  pretensions,  if  he  had  any  such, 
were  defeated  by  the  conduct  and  vigilance  of  Sir  Archibald  Douglas,  who  obliged 
him  to  submit,  and  swear  allegiance  to  the  king,  as  his  rightful  sovereign,  in  the 
church  of  Cumnock;  our  author's  (the  learned  Dr  Major's  words)  are,  "  Post  Angli 
"  decessum,  dominus  Willielmus  Douglasius  sibi  subjectos  colligens,  in  Gal- 
"  luyiam  vadit,  ubi,  ferro  &  verbis,  omnes  ad  Davidis  Brussii  partes  sequendas 
"  impulit :  lllic  Donaldus  M'Douall,  in  ecclesia  de  Cumnoc,  irdelitatem  regi 
"  jurat  ((?).  This  Donaldus,  or  Douenaldus  M'Douall  had  a  son,  Fergusius,  who  is 
designed  patronymically  Fergushis  filius  Douenaldi  M'Douall,  as  witness  to  a  char- 
ter, in  or  about  the  139Q,  granted  by  Johannes  de  Cr aim furd,  filius,  dominus  de 
Dalgarnock,  fobanni  Ferguson  domino  de  Craigdarroch,  de  tern's  de  Garbruch,  in 
baronia  de  Glencarn  (/).  This  Fergusius  must  be  the  same  Fergusius  M'Douall, 
designed  Gallovidianus  by  Dr  Major  in  his  History  of  Scotland,  who,  with  many 
others  of  his  countrymen  of  quality  and  rank,  was  taken  prisoner  by  the  English 

(a)  The  ancient  chartularies  of  Glasgow  and  Melrose,  and  the  ancient  histories,  (i)  Charters  of  the 
abbey  and  nunnery  of  North-Berwick,  raentioncd  by  the  learned  Sir  James  Dalrymplc.  (c)  Ibidem, 
from  the  Chronicon  Saxicon.  {d )  Ragman's  Roll  in  Prynne's  History.  (f )  Majoris  Historia,  Mi 
Freebairn's  late  exact  and  correct  edition,  page  285.     {/)  Charta  penes  Craigdarroch. 


ZS2  APPENDIX. 

tthe  battle  of  Homildon  in  the  1401;  he,  doubtless,  is  the  same  dominus  Ferji/iivi 
Douall,  miles,  who  is  one  of  the  witnesses  to  a  charter  by  Archibnldus  comes  de 
Douglas,  dominus  Gulluidie  W  Annandale,  domino  Jobanni  Senescallo  de  Grayton  li 
Callie,  de  terns  de  Burle,  in  dominio  Galluidie,  and  to  Elizabeth  his  daughter.  The  wit- 
nesses tt">  the  charter  are  IVillielnius  de  Douglas,  nepos  to  the  Earl  of  Douglas  the 
granter,  Thomas  AfCullocb,  Fergusiiis  M-Djuall,  Alexander  Gordon,  Johannes  Keith, 
militibus,  all  knights,  Alexander  Cairnys  prtrpositus  Ecclesiie  de  Lincludin,  Johan- 
nes Gordon,  IVillielmus  Senescalli,  W  aliis.  The  charter  wants  a  date,  as  was  then 
very  usual ;  but  that  which  will  fix  it  very  near,  and  clear  up  the  precise  date,  is  a 
dispensation  from  the  Pope  for  Elizabeth,  the  daughter  of  Sir  John  Stewart,  afore- 
said, to  marry  Alexander  Stewart  of  Torbane,  a  brother  of  the  House  of  Darnly, 
notwithstanding  they  stood  within  the  degrees  of  consanguinity  in  blood,  pro- 
hibited by  the  laws  and  canons  of  the  church.  This  deed  is  dated  in  the  141 1, 
and  goes  far  to  clear  the  date  of  the  former  charter  (rt).  Now,  admitting  that  all 
the  three  families  competing,  Freugh,  Logan,  and  Garthland,  should  claim  this 
dominus  Fergusius  MDouall  to  be  their  own  ancestor,  yet  it  is  plain,  from  these 
following  vouchers,  that  he  is  the  predecessor  of  the  House  of  Freugh;  the  argu- 
ments brought  to  support  this  allegation  are  submitted  to  the  judgment  of  every 
impartial  man,  whether  Freugh  has  not  most  to  say  on  this  point. 

\mo.  Neither  Garthland  nor  Logan,  the  other  two  competing  families,  have  a 
Sir  Fergus  as  the  head  of  their  families  at  the  time;  for,  in  the  1413,  the  name  of 
the  Laird  of  Garthland,  when  he  got  the  charter  of  his  estate  from  the  Earl  of 
Douglas,  his  name  is  not  Fergus,  but  Thomas  M'Dowall  (/!>),  and  his  son's  name  is 
Uthred  M'Dowall  of  Garthland,  in  the  1426.  As  this  Sir  Fergus  M'Dowall  is 
clearly  not  the  ancestor  of  the  House  of  Garthland,  so 

ido.  Neither  is  he  the  ancestor  of  the  House  of  Logan;  for  how  soon  the  family 
of  Logan  have  writs  and  charters  in  the  fourteenth  century,  the  name  of  their  an- 
cestor is  Patrick  M'Dowall  of  Logan  {c).  But  that  no  objection  may  remain,  as  if 
this  Sir  Fergus  M'Dowall  were  the  ancestor  of  the  M'Dowalls  of  Makerston, 
Freugh  urges, 

3«io,  That  from  the  records,  to  which  he  refers  (rf),  he  is  able  to  show,  that  the 
name  of  the  head  of  the  family  of  Makerston  is  not  Fergus,  but  Dougall  M'Dou- 
gall  of  Makerston  from  the  1400,  and  above  twelve  years  downward :  So  that 
Freugh  conceives  himself  so  well  entitled  to  this  Sir  Fergus,  that  he  contends,  and 
on  very  rational  grounds,  that  he  is  his  own  ancestor,  and  can  be  no  other's. 

Although  Freugh,  as  is  already  hinted  in  this  memorial,  has  not  the  remotest 
thought  to  run  down  the  antiquity  or  the  lustre  of  any  of  the  other  families  of  the 
M'Dowalls,  he  only  intends  to  vindicate  himself  from  the  aspersions  thrown  on  his 
family  in  this  Appendix,  though  he  does  not  well  know  from  whom ;  he  thinks  he 
is,  at  least,  entitled  to  an  antiquity  as  high  as  any  other  family  of  the  M'Dowalls 
whatever,  and  to  a  perfect  equality  of  rank;  and  he  has  no  view  of  carrying  his 
pretensions  any  further,  though  he  might  urge  that  his  family  seems  to  have  been 
considered  in  ancient  times  as  superior  to  the  other  two  in  quality,  because  the 
House  of  Freugh  had  the  patronage  of  the  parochial  church,  where  at  that  time 
they  all  had  their  chief  seats  of  residence;  Garthland  has  it  still,  and  all  the  three  have 
the  burial-place  of  their  families  at  the  church  of  Stonnykirk.  A  patronage,  we  may 
observe,  was  a  noble  dignity  in  a  family  in  times  of  popery  ;  it  was  highly  esteem- 
ed, because  the  patron  was  to  be  named  in  all  the  masses  said  in  this  church;  and 
it  is  a  maxim  among  antiquaries,  that  a  patronage  was  always  given  to  the  fa- 
milies of  the  greatest  eminence  of  rank  in  the  parochial  district.  As  far  as  this 
argument  can  go,  it  is  with  the  family  of  Freugh  ;  for  when  the  lordship  of  Gal- 
loway came  to  be  vested  in  the  crown,  by  the  attainder  of  James,  the  last  of  the 
race  of  the  Earls  of  Douglas,  in  the  1455  (f),  the  Jus  patronatus  Si'  advocationl 
ecclesiae  de  Stonny-kirk  is  given  and  bestowed  on  Gilbert  M'Dowall  of  Ravenston 
and  Freugh  (/). 

ia)  The  charter  to  Sir  John  Stewart  by  the  Earl  of  Douglas,  I  have  seen  under  the  hand  of  the  cele- 
brated antiquary  Mr  David  Simpson,  Historigcapher  for  Scotland,  taken  out  of  the  Earl  of  Galloway's 
charter-cbest.  (4)  The  original  charter  cited  by  Mr  Nisbet,  and  is  exact  enough.  (f)  Charter  by 
Patrick  M'Dowall  of  the  lands  of  Aldrich,  &c.  in  1454.  (</)  Charters  from  the  registers,  (e)  Black 
acts  of  Parliament.  (/)  Charter  from  the  croivn  to  Gilbert  M'Dowall  of  Ravenston,  in  the  custody  of 
the  present  Freugh. 


APPENDIX.  253 

We  come  next  to  deduce  the  line  and  race  of  the  descent  of  Freugh,  and  in  this 
respect  his  family  writs  will  carry  him  up  to  the  reign  of  King  James  1.  which 
is  as  far  back  as  any  of  his  two  competitors  can  carry  the  standing  of  their  families : 
For  Freugh  acknowledges,  that  none  of  the  three  families  have  the  first  charters  or 
titles  to  their  estates  they  might,  and  no  doubt  had,  from  the  crown,  when  the 
lordship  of  Galloway  was  vested  there,  before  it  was  given  to  Sir  Archibald  Dou- 
glas, afterwards  Earl  of  Douglas,  in  the  1371  (c/).  1  am  apt  to  beheve  he  was  a 
hard  and  rigorous  master  to  his  vassals,  forced  them  to  give  up  their  ancient  char- 
ters, and  continued  them  in  possession  by  such  title  as  he  was  pleased  to  give  them  ; 
for  not  one  charter  by  him  to  his  vassals  appears,  and  but  only  one  granted  by  his 
son,  and  another  by  his  grandson  (b)  ;  which  are  all  the  charters  that  are  extant  to 
any  of  the  vassals  of  the  lordship  of  Galloway,  till  it  came  to  the  crown. 

But  though  M'Dowall  of  Freugh  has  no  charter  or  other  title  to  his  estate  from 
the  crown,  till  after  the  attainder  of  the  House  of  Douglas,  yet  it  is  certain, 
from  other  authentic  vouchers,  that  they  had  the  estates  of  Ravenston,  Freugh, 
and  Urle,  before  that :  For  it  is  clear,  that  Gilbert  M'Dowall  of  Ravenston  gave 
the  lands  of  Urle,  in  the  lordship  of  Craighlaw,  to  John  Macgiligh,  who,  it  seems, 
having  only  a  daughter  or  heir-female,  bestowed  her  in  marriage,  with  his  estate, 
on  Gilbert  M'Dowall,  son  and  heir,  as  he  is  designed,  of  Gilbert  M'Dowall  of  Ra- 
venston. He  gave  him  and  Katharine  Macgiligh,  his  wife,  a  charter  of  the  lands. 
Their  instrument  of  possession  is  dated  the  8th  of  November  1445  (c),  which  is 
ten  years  before  the  forfeiture  of  the  Earl  of  Douglas :  But  this  shows  that  the 
House  of  Freugh  had  their  estate  long  before  they  have  any  charters  from  the 
crown,  which  was  not  before  the  reign  of  King  James  II.  Sure  we  are  this  gentle- 
man got  from  the  crown  a  feu-charter  of  the  lands  of  Ravenston,  Urle,  and  Freugh, 
with  the  advocation  and  donation  of  the  church  Stonnykirk,  which  he  again,  in  the 
decline  of  his  age  and  years,  resigns  in  the  Sovereign's  hands  in  favour  of  Gilbert 
M'Dowall  his  grandson,  "  nepoti  suo  et  hsredi  apparenti ;"  upon  which  there  was 
a  charter  expede  in  due  form  under  the  Great  Seal,  the  17th  January  1473-4  {d). 
His  own  son,  Fergus,  had  died  in  the  life  of  his  father:  But  he  left  a  son,  we  see, 
his  grandfather's  heir  apparent,  to  whom  he  gave  the  fee  of  his  estate ;  and  after 
that  he  conveys  the  most  of  his  moveable  estate  to  him,  reserving  a  right  out  of 
the  whole  to  his  lady,  Agnes  M'Culloch,  who  was  of  the  House  of  Myrton  (e), 
His  grandfather  died  at  a  great  age  in  1496,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  grandson 
Gilbert  M'Dowall  of  Freugh  (/),  who  was  slain  with  a  huge  deal  of  the  nobility 
and  gentry  of  Scotland,  with  King  James  IV.  at  the  misfortunate  battle  of  Flod- 
den,  the  9th  September  1513  (g),  leaving  issue  by  Isabel  his  wife,  daughter  of 

Gordon  of  Lochinvar  (h),  the  ancestor  of  the  Viscounts  of  Kenmure. 

Fergus,  his  son  and  successor,  who,  in  the  15 18,  was  served  and  retoured  heir  to 
Gilbert  M'Dowall  of  Freugh,  his  father,  and  to  Fergus,  his  grandfather,  nvus  smis  (/')• 
He  brought  a  very  noble  alliance  by  marriage  to  his  family ;  his  wife  was  Dame 
Janet  Kennedy,  daughter  of  David  the  first  Earl  of  Cassilis  {k),  sister  to  Gilbert 
Earl  of  Cassilis,  who  contracts  the  lady  his  sister  in  marriage.  He  was  slain  on 
Saturday,  commonly  called  the  Black  Saturday,  the  loth  of  September  1547,  at 
the  battle  of  Pinky-Cleugh,  against  the  English,  and  left  a  son  to  succeed  hun  by 
his  wife  the  foresaid  noble  lady,  James  M'Dowall  of  Freugh,  who  is  served  heir 
to  his  father,  "  qui  obiit  ad  fidem  et  pacem,  sub  vexillo  S.  D.  N.  Regince,  in  campo 
"  belli  apud  Pmky-Cleugh  (/).  He  married  Florence,  daughter  of  John  M'Dowall 
of  Garthland  (ra).  The  marriage  proceeds  upon  a  dispensation  from  the  Apostolic 
See  (so  the  court  of  Rome  is  called)  because  of  consanguinity  the  parties  stood 
in  to  other.  He  had  issue  by  his  lady,  John  M'Dowall  of  Freugh  (//),  who 
died  without  issue  ;  so  his  estate,  that  stood  devised  to  heirs  whatever,  came  to  his 
sister  Mary  M'Dowall,  heiress  of  Freugh  ;  her  uncle,  Uchred  M'Dowall  of  Garth- 
land,  had  her  ward,  and  was  her  guardian.      He  bestowed  her  in  marriage  on 

(a)  Haddington's  Collections  from  the  Records.  (/>)  One  in  Garthland's  custody,  and  another  in 
Vans  of  Barnbaroch's.  (r)  Charter  I  have  seen  in  the  hands  of  Freugh.  {d)  Still  extant  in  the  family  of 
Freugh.  {e)  Ibidem.  (/)  Ibidem,  (g)  Ibidem.  (A)  Charta  penes  Freugh.  (/')  Ibidem,  (f)  The  ori- 
ginal marriage-articles  are  still  extant  in  the  charter-chest  of  the  family  of  Freugh  ;  the  marriage  portion 
is  400  merks.  (/)  Ibidem,  [ra)  The  contract  and  dispensation  is  still  e-xtant  in  the  writs  of  the  fanjily. 
(«)  Writs  ot  the  family,  ad  annum  1577. 

Vol.  II.  7  B 


i54  APPENDIX. 

a  gentleman  of  her  ow-q  blood  and  kindred,  wbo,  they  say,  was  an  heii-maie  ol 
her  own  family,  John  M'Dowall,  apparent  heir  of  Dowalton :  However  this  be, 
the  right  of  tlie  blood,  and  all  the  claims  of  the  fatiiily,  were  vested  in  the  lady  her- 
self, and  transmitted  to  her  posterity.  The  lady  was  a  great  fortune  :  But  tht; 
maiTiage  was  not  brought  about  till  the  lady  and  her  future  husband  were  obli- 
ged, so  soon  they  should  be  duly  vested  in  all  the  rights  of  the  family  of  Freugb.^ 
to  part  with,  and  denude  themselves  in  favour  of  her  uncle  and  tutor  Garthland, 
of  the  patronage  of  the  church  of  Stonnykirk,  and  some  other  valuable  considera- 
tions ;  though  these  conditions  might  be  somewhat  hard  of  digestion,  yet  the 
young  lovers,  being  in  furore  amorii,  went  in  to  them;  so  the  marriage  was  solem- 
nized i'j).  Soon  after  that  they  resigned  the  "  Patronatus  Ecclesice  de  Stonykirk 
"  Uchredo  M'Douall  of  Garthland,"  which  has  been  ever  since  continued  down  iu 
his  family  ;  though  we  see  it  origmaUy  flowed  from  the  family  of  Freugh  to  them, 
who  had  it  directly  from  the  crown  in  the  reign  of  King  James  II.  The  heir  of 
the  marriage  was  John  M'Dowall  of  Freugh,  his  maternal  ancestor,  who  is  served 
heir  to  James  M'Dowall  of  freugh.  and  had  all  the  rights  that  were  in  him  vested 
in  his  person.  In  the  time  of  the  Usurpation  he  was  a  high  royalist,  and  main- 
tained the  king's  interest  in  the  worst  times,  with  inflexible  firmness  and  fidelity. 
He  was  very  terrible  to  the  English  forces  in  Galloway,  when  they  ventured  out 
in  small  parties  from  their  head-quarters,  or  their  garris-ons ;  they,  in  their  turn, 
took  severe  revenges,  and  burnt  his  house  and  fort  at  i>eugh,  took  himself  pri- 
soner, and  carried  him  to  England  :  But  he  happily  made  his  escape,  and  got  safe 
to  Scotlai>d.  ilis  lady  was  Margaret,  daughter  of  Sir  Patrick  Vans  Lord  Barnha- 
coch,  one  of  tJie  Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice  ip),  by  whom  he  had  Uehred  bis 
son  and  heir,  Fergus,  a  younger  son,  who  went  to  Ireland,  whose  lineal  heir  is 
John  M'Dowall  of  Bellytragh,  Esq.  of  the  county  of  Cavan. 

UcHR-ED  M'DowAU.  of  FVeugh  was  served  heir  to  his  father  31st  July  1669  (q) ; 
he,  as  his  father  had  been,  was  a  firm  royalist,  and  had  several  military  commands 
in  the  king's  service,  both  in  Scotland  and  in  Ireland.  Upon  the  happy  turn  of 
the  Restoration,  he  was  chosen  a  member  of  the  first  Parliament,  called  by  King 
Charles,  fiar  the  county  of  Wigton  1661,  though  he  did  not  run  violently  into  the 
measures  of  the  court  in  setthng  of  Episcopacy,  and  in  annulling  all  the  acts  of  the 
foiTnex  times.  He  married  Agnes,  daughter  of  Sir  Patrick  Agnew  of  Lochnaw, 
liereditary  sheriff  of  Wigton  (r)  ;  by  whom  he  had  Patrick  his  son  and  successor. 
Uehred,  the  second  son,  a  nian  of  figure  and  business  in  the  way  of  trade  andmer- 
chandiz£  at  Edinburgh,  was  a  hailie  there.  Alexander,  bred  to  the  law,  was  an 
advocate  before  the  Court  of  Session  :  He  died  without  issue. 

Partick  M'Dowall  of  Freugh  was  served  and  retoured  heir  to  his  father  the 
26th  FeiMTuary  1670  (j-),  and  succeeded  to  a  right  opulent  estate.  His  principles 
led  him  to  join  in  the  rising  at  Bothwell,  as  a  hkely  mean  to  retrieve  the  oppres- 
sions his  country  groaned  mider.  When  the  design  was  broke  by  the  defeat  of  the 
party,  it  came  soon  to  be  known  he  had  been  among  them  ;  so  he  was  first  ex- 
cepted out  of  the  indemnity  (?).  Soon  after  that  an  indictment  of  high  treason 
was  brought  against  him  before  the  High  Court  of  Justiciary  {?/).  The  trial  was 
soon  dispatched ;  for  it  was  proven  that  he  was  seen  marching  at  the  head  of  three 
or  four  hundred  of  the  rebels  at  Sanquhar  and  Hamilton-muir,  where  the  engage- 
ment was :  so  that  he  was  attainted  (v).  Captain  Graham  of  Claverhouse,  a  ris- 
sing  favourite,  had  an  eye  to  his  estate,  and  had  got  the  promise  of  it  as  soon  as  it 
should  be  confiscated  ;  so  he,  with  great  eagerness,  saw  the  sentence  of  forfeiture 
punctually  executed,  as  the  law  directed ;  the  tearing  out  his  coat  of  arms  out  of 
the  hooks  of  heraldi-y,  and  tlie  throwing  them  over  the  cross  of  Edinburgh  with 
sound  of  trumpet,  as  a  part  of  the  ceremonial,  was  not  omitted.  This  is  the  rea- 
son why  the  armorial  bearing  of  the  house  of  Freugh  may  not  be  in  the  registers 
of  the  Lyon  Office  ;  so  when  Freugh's  attainder  was  taken  ofi'at  the  Revolution,  and 

(0)  Marr'u^e-artic)es  beHvixt  John, M'Dowall,  apparent  heir  of  Dowalton,  and  Mary  M'Dowall,  daugh- 
ter and  heiress  of  James  M'Dowall  of  Freugh,  in  ihc  year  1583,  penes  John  M'Dowall  de  Freugb. 
■(  p)  Cbarta  penes  Freugh.  ic)  Ibidem,  (r)  Ibidem,  (j)  Ibidem.  (/)  Act  of  indemnity  published  im- 
mediately after  the  defeat  at  ^athwell  1679,  in  the  records  of  council,  (a)  Journals  of  Justiciary.  ('.>)  Ibi- 
Hem  :  Joiarnalsof  Justiciary. 

2 


ATPEECDIX.  355 

his  son  i^tored,  he  had  no  other  way  left  to  ascertain,  with  any  cKactness,  -vrhat 
had  been  the  armorial  beaaing  of  his  ancestor,  but  by  obserring  nicely  what  was 
cut  out  on  his  hoQse,  and  graved  on  his  fanaily  utensils :  This  he  did,  and  got  the 
arms  and  the  whole  achievement,  used  and  carried  by  his  ancestois,  attested 
by  some  gentlemen  of  honoar  and  probity,  and  others  conversant  in  matters  of 
that  kind.  The  original  attestation  is  extant ;  an  exact  copy  taken  froni  it  is  here 
subjoined. 

"  We  undersubscribers  do  hereby  certify  and  declare,  that  we  have  often  seen 
"  and  viewed  the  coat  of  arms  of  the  ancient  family  of  Freugh,  which  had  been 
"  born  by  them,  handsomely  cut  on  a  window-broad,  which  was  saved  when  the 
"  house  of  Freugh  was  burnt  by  the  English.  This  broad  we  have  often  seen, 
"  and  noticed  in  the  house  before  it  was  last  burnt  by  accident.  And  we  have 
"  also  seen  the  same  coat  of  arms  cut  out  on  an  old  wainscot  bed,  viz.  a  lion 
"  rampant,  crowned  with  an  imperial  crown,  and  an  open  crown  about  his  neck, 
"  with  a  lion's  paw,  holding  a  dagger  pointed  upward,  for  the  crest ;  the  helmet 
"  with  mantling  ;  and  for  supporters,  two  savages,  having  each  a  laurel  crown 
"  and  girdle,  holding  a  flaming  dagger  in  one  hand  pointing  upward,  the  motto 
"  above  in  a  folding  scroll,  I'lncen  vel  mori,  and  below  upon  another.  Fro  Deo 
"  et  Rege  et  Fatrin.  The  said  coat,  by  the  initials,  was  cut  out  by  G.  M.  D. 
♦•  for  Gilbert  M'Douall  of  Freugh,  anno  1475,  upon  the  coat  of  arms  on  th€  bed 
"  was  J.  M.  D.  for  James  M'Douall  of  Freugh,  anno  1543.  In  testimony  of  the 
"  verity  of  the  above  written  declaration,  these  preserrts  are  certified,  and  signed 
"  by  Mr  William  M'Douall  of  Mye,  -writer  hereof,  Mr  Robert  Gordon  cf  Park, 
*'  with  Matthew  Torbane  in  Ardwell,  and  John  Blair  in  Kirkmagil,  both  joiners, 
"  dated  at  Stonykirk  the  26th  January  1 720." 

Matthew  Torbane.  Will.  M'Douall. 

John  Blair.  Rob.  Gordon. 

Freugh,  the  gentleman  who  was  attainted,  after  his  party  were  broke  at  Both- 
well,  found  means  to  make  his  escape,  and  got  into  England,  where  he  Hved  con- 
cealed foT  some  short  time  ;  after  that  he  got  home  to  his  own  country.  His  mis- 
fortune and  unhappy  situarion  sunk  deep  irrto  his  heart ;  for  he  quickly  fisll  into 
an  apoplexy,  of  which  he  died  on  the  13th  of  January  i68o  {w),  and  was  interred 
in  the  church  of  Kirkcowen,  where  part  of  his  estate  lay.  He  left  issue  by  Bar- 
bara his  wife,  daughter  of  James  Fullarton  of  that  ilk,  one  of  the  ancientest  fami- 
lies in  all  the  shire  of  Ayr,  and  can  best  vouch  their  antiquity,  Patrick,  his  eldest 
son  and  successor,  William  M'Dowall,  Esq.  a  younger  son,  who  was  an  officer  in 
ttie  army  in  the  war  with  France,  and  after  the  peace  was  put  into  a  place  in  the 
Customs. 

Patrick.  M'Dowall  of  Freugh  was  restored  again  to  his  father's  forfeiture,  which 
by  act  of  Parliamerrt  was  repealed  (.v),  and  he  restored  to  his  estate,  honour,  and 
fame.  I  am  well  informed  he  was  a  gentleman  of  good  parts  and  learning,  chiefly 
in  antiquities  and  the  history  of  families  :  Some  of  his  performances  in  that  way 
I  have  seen,  that  are  both  correct  and  exact,  far  beyond  what  could  be  expected 
from  a  gentleman  who  lived  mostly  in  the  country,  made  the  study  an  amuse- 
ment, and  had  not  searched  and  gone  through  records  and  offices  :  Withal  he 
minded  chiefly  the  recovering  of  his  family  from  the  great  debts  under  which  it 
was  sinking,  by  the  misfortune  of  his  father,  which  was  raised  up  again  by  his 
great  management.  He  married  Margaret,  daughter  and  at  length  one  of  the  co- 
heirs of  William  Haltridge  of  Dromore,  Esq.  of  the  county  of  Down  in  Ireland, 
by  whom  he  had  only  one  son  who  survived  him,  John,  his  heir  and  successor, 
and  a  good  many  daughters,  that  brought  a  rery  honourable  alliance  to  his 
family.  The  brevity  of  this  memorial  will  not  allow  to  enlarge  on,  and 
being  recent.     He  died  on  the  15th  of  October  1729,  and  was  succeeded  by  his 


(lu)  Mem.  Patiick  M'Dowall  of  Freugh,  in  ihe  family,     (t)  Act  of  Parliameat  1690. 


aj6  APPENDIX. 

John  M'DowAtL  of  M'Dowall  and  Freugh  (y),  who  is  acknowledged  by  all 
that  have  the  honour  to  be  known  to  him,  to  be  a  generous  open-hearted  fine 
gentleman.  He  has  married  a  lady  of  high  quality  and  rank,  Lady  Betty  Crich- 
ton,  daughter  of  Colonel  WiUiam  Dalrymple  of  Glenmuir,  brother  to  the  present 
Earl  of  Stair,  by  his  lady  Penelope  Countess  of  Dumfries,  in  right  of  her  own 
tlood,  by  whom  he  has  a  numerous  hopeful  issue,  viz.  Patrick,  his  eldest  son  and 
heir  apparent,  William,  Stair,  John,  Crichton,  Penelope,  and  Margaret,  being  seven 
yet  alive. 


Of  the  family  of  the  MUIRHEADS  of  Lachop,  now  represented  by  Muir- 

HEAD  of  BrEAX)ISHOLM,    AS  THE  HEIR-MALE. 


THE  family  of  Muirhead  of  Lauchop,  or  Muirhead  of  that  Ilk,  has  been  always 
reputed  one  of  the  ancientest  families  in  all  the  shire  of  Lanark.  It  is  not  known 
how  soon  they  had  the  lands  ot  Muirhead,  that  being  past  all  memory,  and  their 
first  original  charters  have  had  the  fate  of  many  others,  to  be  lost :  Their  house  of 
Lauchop  was  indeed  burnt  down  by  the  Earl  of  Murray's  friends,  the  regent ; 
because  the  then  Laird  of  Lauchop  sheltered  his  brother-in-law,  James  Hamilton  of 
Bothwelhaugh,  at  his  house,  when  he  fled  from  Linlithgow,  after  he  had  killed  the 
regent  in  1569  ;  and  by  that  sudden  unexpected  shock  they  lost  most  of  all  the 
old  evidents  and  charters  of  the  family. 

The  surname  de  Morehead  or  Muirhead  is,  like  other  surnames  of  the  greatest 
antiquity,  local,  taken  from  lands,  from  whence  either  the  proprietor  took  a  deno- 
mination, when  fixed  hereditary  surnames  became  customary,  or  took  an  appella- 
tion from  the  lands  as  soon  as  he  obtained  them  ;  for  it  is  a  maxim  amongst  anti- 
quaries, that  it  is  a  sufficient  document  of  an  ancient  descent,  where  the  inha- 
bitant has  the  surname  from  the  place  he  inhabiteth.  So  much  is  certain  for  the 
antiquity  of  the  surname  and  family  of  Muirhead,  that  they  have  been  fixed  in 
the  barony  of  BothweU  before  the  reign  of  King  Alexander  II.  that  David  de  Oli- 
phard  or  Olipbant,  was  Dominus  Baronia  de  Botbwel ;  for  they  never  wore  any 
part  of  the  arms  of  their  superiors,  as  arms  of  patronage,  for  the  Oliphants  had 
crescents.  As  the  Muirheads  had  not  the  arms  of  their  superiors,  the  Oliphants, 
neither  had  they  any  part  of  the  bearing  of  the  Murrays,  who  succeeded  to  the 
barony  of  Bothwell,  by  the  marriage  of  the  heir-female  ;  for  it  is  well  known  the 
armorial  figures  of  the  Murrays  were  three  stars ;  for  the  double  tressure  was  but 
an  addition  to  the  original  arms.  As  they  wore  no  part  of  the  arms  of  patronage 
of  the  Murrays,  who  indeed  were  great  men,  Panitarii  Scotice,  neither  had  they 
any  thing  in  their  armorial  bearing  like  the  great  and  illustrious  family  of  the 
Douglasses,  who  in  the  reign  of  King  Robert  II.  became  superior  lords  of  the 
whole  great  barony  of  Bothwell,  dominum  baroniae  de  Botbwell,  by  the  marriage 
of  Daine  Jean  daughter  and  sole  heir  of  Thomas  de  Moravia,  Do?ninus  de  Botbwel, 
ac  Panitarius  Scotiae  (z).  The  truth  is,  the  family  of  the  Mairheads  must  have 
been  a  set  of  people,  that  since  they  never  assumed  the  arms,  or  any  part  thereof, 
from  their  respective  superiors  or  over-lords,  as  was  very  usual,  the  presumption 
must  be,  that  they  were  seated  a  family,  and  fixed  there,  before  the  Oliphards  had 
the  barony  of  Bothwell  ;  and  that  they  were  the  liheri  tenentes  Regis  et  Coronae, 
before  the  crown  gave  the  superiority  of  the  Baroiiia  de  Botbwel  to  the  Oliphards  ; 
and  so  we  may  rationally,  and  without  stretching  things,  conclude,  that  the  Muir- 
head family  were  fixed,  and  proprietors-  of  the  lands  of  Muirhead,  as  far  back  as 

(y)  The  family  of  Freugh  have  their  charter  from  the  crown,  creeling  their  estate  into  a  barony,  tht 
fearony  of  M'Dowall.     (k)  Liber  Dunblanen.  MSS.  penes  meipsum. 


APPENDIX.  257 

the  reirn  of  King  Willium,  ov  sooner  for  wkat  wc  know,  evL-n  up  to  the  tinrc  that 
surnames  began  to  be  taken  up,  ajid  men  began  to  call  themselves  after  their  own 
laiuls;  which  is  agreed  was  nut  the  custom  generally  gone  into  before  the  reign 
of  King  Da\aJ  I.  {iiino  11 22. 

The  tradition  goes,  and  as  I  had  it  from  a  learned  and  curious  antiquary,  who 
was  also  a  gentleman  of  great  reputation  and  integrity  («),  tiiat  the  Laird  of  Muir- 
head  of  that  Ilk,  de  Muirbead,  as  I  have  often  found  them  designed,  in  the  time 
of  King  Robert  II.  got  the  lands  of  Lauchop  and  other*,  for  assaulting  and  killing 
a  great  robber  that  infested  all  that  part  of  the  country,  by  violent  ravages  and 
depredations,  which  he  carried  to  a  very  insuflerable  degree  ;  so  tliat  at  length  the 
government  were  obliged  to  take  notice  of  him ;  and,  by  a  public  act,  notified, 
"  That  whosoever  should  apprehend,  kill  him,  or  bring  him  to  justice,  should  be 
"  rewarded  with  such  aad  such  lands."  His  name,  tiie  tradition  tells  us,  was 
Bertram  de  Sljotts  ;  he  was  a  terror  to  every  body  that  resided  near  him,  or  who 
had  occasion  to  pass  east  or  west  through  those  parts  where  he  lurked  and  had  his 
haunts.  The  Laird  of  Muirhead,  at  the  time,  was  a  bold,  daring,  intrepid  man  ; 
he  did  not  surprise  him  in  his  lurking  places,  but  with  a  few  in  his  company, 
to  whose  courage  and  valour  he  could  well  trust,  came  up,  and,  in  the  day  time, 
attacked  him  in  that  valley  on  the  east  side  of  the  kirk  of  Shotts,  when,  after  a 
pretty  smart  encounter,  the  Goliah  Bertram  was  slain  on  the  place.  The  Laird  ot 
Muirhead  cut  the  head  off  this  robber,  which  he  carried  straight  to  the  king,  who 
immediately,  in  the  terms  of  the  proclamation,  ordered  him  a  charter  and  infeft- 
ment  of  these  lands,  that  were  then  or  soon  after  called  Lauchop,  and  gave  him,  as 
an  additional  honour  to  his  arms,  the  three  acorns  in  the  seed,  on  the  bend  dexter; 
for  crest,  two  hands  supporting  a  sword  in  pale,  proper  ;  and  the  motto,  Auxilio- 
Dei,  which  is  borne  by  the  family  to  this  day  (6).  When  the  Lairds  of  Muirhead 
came  of  course  to  be  vassals  to  the  Earls  of  Douglas  for  their  estate  in  the  barony 
of  Bothwell,  the  tradition  is.  That  beinggallant  brave  men,  they  were  mightily  aiding 
and  assisting  to  them,  not  only  in  the  public  wars  in  the  defence  of  the  country 
against  invasions  from  England,  but  even  in  the  lesser  feuds  and  scrapes  they 
were,  as  was  customary,  engaged  in  against  other  great  families,  which  were  some- 
times carried  far,  and  much  blood  shed  on  both  sides ;  it  was  in  reward,  they  say, 
of  these  services  to  the  Hause  of  Douglas,  who  were  also  Lords  of  Galloway,  that 
the  Lairds  of  Lauchop  had  tirst  the  feu  from  them  of  the  lands  of  Daldenan,  Clon- 
ard,  &c.  (cj,  which  thsy  continued  to  possess  in  feu  and  assedation  from  the 
crown,  after  the  forfeiture  of  the  House  of  Douglas ;  and  it  is  reported  their  estate 
was  by  far  greater  and  more  considerable  in  Galloway  than  it  was  in  the  county 
of  Lanark. 

The  first  charter  I  have  seen  of  any  note  concerning  this  ancient  family,  is  a 
a  deed  granted  by  Archibaldus  Comes  de  Douglas,  Dominus  Galovidice  et  Bothwel^ 
dicto  scutifero  sua  IViUielmo  de  Muirhead,  of  his  lands  of  Muirhead,  in  baronia  de 
Botbwel,  in  the  1393  (rf).  Being  a  gentleman  of  mettle  and  spirit,  and  who 
seems  to  have  had  a  turn  for  business,  he  had  the  honour  of  knighthood  conferred 
on  him  by  King  Robert  IIL  for  we  find  him  designed,  in  no  less  an  authority  than 
the  learned  Mr  Rymer  in  the  Fcedera  Angliae,  Dom.  IVUlielmus  de  Mairhead,  miles. 
This  same  noble  gentleman  had  the  honour,  in  the  1404,  to  be  employed  with  Sir 
David  Fleming,  whom  the  king  calls  consanguineus  suus,  to  treat  with  the  King 
of  England,  Henry  IV.  or  his  Commissioners,  concerning  the  redemption  of  the 
Earls  of  Fife  and  Douglas,  who  had  been  both  taken  prisoners  at  the  battle  of 
Homildon  in  Northumberland,   two  years  before  (£■) ;  impowering  them  also  to 


(a)  I  mean  my  most  worthy  frieiid  William  Hamilton  of  Wlshaw.  (A)  Mr  NIsbet's  Heraldry,  page 
438,  intimating,  that  he  went  out  in  the  strength  of  God  to  vanquish  that  robber,  who  was  a  pest  to  the 
country,  (c)  Assedation  in  1517  from  the  crown,  Daldenan  Joanni  Muirhe.td,  filio  et  hseredi  quondam 
Joannis  Muirhead,  who  was  Jlain  at  Flodden  ;  and  another  feu  or  tack  to  him  in  the  exchequer  rolls, 
Joanni  Muirhead,  fiiio  et  h;eredi  Joannis  Muirhead  de  Bullis,  de  Clonard.  (d)  Note  of  this  charter  in  the 
genealogy  of  the  family  I  have  seen,     (f)  Rymer's  Fffidera,  ad  annum  1402. 


Vou  IL  f  C 


i5«  APPENDIX. 

conclude  a  tiuce  or  peace  (/).  The  commissioners  of  both  kings  met  at  Ponte- 
fract,  and,  on  the  6th  of  July  1404,  agreed  to  a  truce,  which  was  to  commence  on 
the  20th  of  that  month,  and  to  last  till  Easter  the  next  year  ;  as  also,  that  during 
that  interval  of  time,  a  congress  should  be  held  at  Handerstank,  in  order  to  a 
more  complete  and  satisfying  treaty  ;  but  an  unlucky  unforeseen  event,  the  seiz- 
ing the  prince  going  to  France,  diverted  them  from  pursuing  the  measures  that  had 
been  laid  down. 

This  Knight  of  Muirhead  of  the  House  of  Lauchop,  married  Dame  Jean  Hay, 
daughter  of  Sir  William  Hay  of  Locharret,  ancestor  of  the  Lords  of  Yester,  and 
of  the  Earls  and  Marquisses  of  Tweeddale  {^),  by  whom  he  had  IVillielmus  de  Muir- 
head, Dominus  de  Lachop,  in  1445  {b). 

Dr  Andrew  Muirhead,  who  being  from  his  youth  bred  up  with  a  view  to  the 
service  of  the  church,  and  taking  holy  orders,  was  first  rector  of  Cadyow  ;  and 
after  that  rising  in  reputation  for  his  piety,  learning,  and  mtegrity,  was  preferred  to 
the  Episcopal  .See  of  Glasgow  on  the  demise  of  the  ever  memorable  Bishop  Turn- 
bull,  on  the  third  of  September,  in  the  year  1454  (/).  It  must  have  been  upon 
the  knowledge,  as  well  as  the  fame  of  the  consummate  merit  of  this  worthy  pre- 
late, that  either  the  canons  or  prebends  pi  the  chapter  of  the  Episcopal  See  were 
induced  to  elect,  or  the  king  to  conform  the  choice  of  a  successor,  even  so  regu- 
larly and  duly  elected,  according  to  the  canons  of  the  church,  to  Bishop  Turnbull, 
as  Dr  Muirhead.  They  seem  to  have  been  very  just  in  their  choice,  for  he  had  not 
been  long  in  the  See,  when  the  greatest  honour  was  done  him  that  could  be  thought 
of,  (not  by  any  private  deed,  but  by  a  public  national  act  of  the  estates  of  Parlia- 
ment) to  testify  the  esteem  they  had  of  his  character ;  for,  on  the  death  of  King 
James  II.  he  was  named,  in  the  1460,  one  of  the  Lords  of  the  Regency,  in  whom 
the  power  of  the  sovereignty  was  lodged,  till  the  young  king  should  be  of  age.  The 
Bishop's  colleagues  in  that  important  office  were,  the  Bishop  of  St  Andrews,  Bishop 
Kennedy,  the  Bishop  of  Dunkeld,  Dr  Lauder,  the  Earl  of  Orkney,  the  Lords  Boyd, 
Graham,  and  Kennedy  (/^);  and  it  is  acknowledged,  to  the  honour  of  their  memory, 
that  they  ruled  the  kingdom  to  their  great  glory,  and  the  infinite  advantage  both 
of  the  king  and  people,  and  that  with  uninterrupted  harmony  and  unanimity.  One 
of  the  first  things,  it  seems,  the  governors  thought  fit  to  do  for  preserving  the  peace 
and  tranquillity  of  the  nation,  was  to  come  to  an  accomniodation  with  England,  and 
to  treat  upon  a  truce  (/).  Accordingly  a  commission  is  issued  out  in  the  name 
of  the  young  king  in  the  1462,  authorising  Bishop  Kennedy  of  St  Andrews,  Bishop 
Muirhead  of  Glasgow,  the  Abbot  of  Holyroodhouse,  Mr  Archibald  Crawfurd,  Mr 
James  Lindsay,  the  Provost  of  Lincluden,  the  Privy  Seal,  the  Earl  of  Argyle,  the 
Lord  Livingston,  the  Lord  Hamilton,  the  Lord  Borthwick,  the  Lord  Boyd,  Sir  Alex- 
ander Boyd  of  Duncow,  to  meet  and  treat  with  the  commissioners  of  the  crown  of 
England,  in  order  to  negociate  a  truce.  Accordingly  they  met  at  York  ;  and,  on 
the  19th  December  agreed  to  the  following  conditions  (w)  :  "  That  it  should  last 
"  from  the  i6th  day  of  December,  by  land  and  fresh  water,  to  the  last  day  of  Oc- 
•'  tober  next  coming  ;  and  from  the  first  day  of  February  next,  till  the  same  last 
"  day  of  October,  by  sea :  Secondly,  That  James  King  of  Scotland  shall  give  no 
"  assistance  to  Henry,  late  calling  himself  King  of  England,  or  his  adherents,  dur- 
"  ing  the  aUiance  or  truce  :  Thirdly,  That  Edward  King  of  England  shall  give 
"  no  countenance  or  protection  to  any  traitors  or  rebels  to  King  James:  Fourthly, 
"  That  in  regard  James  Earl  of  Douglas  was  become  liegeman  to  King  Edward, 
"  he,  or  such  other  Scotsmen,  shall  enjoy  the  benefit  of  the  truce:  Fifthly,  That  if 
"  Henry,  late  called  King  of  England,  or  any  other  his  adherents,  shall  become 
"  liegemen  to  the  said  King  James,  they  shall,  in  that  case,  have  the  benefit  of 
"  the  truce  as  all  his  other  liegemen." 

(/)  Rymer's  Foedera  Anglic,  ad  annum  1404;  and  some  part  of  this  is  taken  notice  of  by  our 
own  historians,  particularly  my  worthy  learned  friend  Dr  Patrick  Abercromby,  in  his  second  volume 
of  the  History  of  Scotland,  page  222.  {g)  Manuscript  History  of  the  House  of  Tweeddale  in  the  family 
of  Tweeddale.  {h)  Note  of  the  History  of  the  House  of  Lauchop  I  have  seen,  (i)  Obituary  of  the 
Episcopal  See  of  Glasgow  in  the  Chartulary  of  the  Bishopric  in  the  Scots  College  at  Paris,  1  have  seen. 
(h)  Buchanan  and  Abercromby,  and  the  other  histories.  (1)  Rymer.  The  ambassadors,  2d  June  1460, 
are  the  Bishop  of  St  Andrews,  Bishop  of  Glasgow,  with  a  retinue  of  30  persons  in  his  company. 
{m^  Rymer's  Fadera,  and  Dr  Abercromby  from  him,  page  390. 


APPENDIX.  2s<> 

The  very  prospect  of  so  long  a  calm  put  the  bishop  upon  executing  the  more 
immediate  offices  of  his  function  ;  for  after  this  he  made  several  regulations  in  the 
chapter  of  the  See,  and  founded  the  vicars  of  the  choir  that  had  not  been  in  his 
church  before,  J'undator  vicariir.  choiii  in  ecclesia  Ghis^nicii.  (a),  as  he  is  called. 
He  also  adorned  and  beautified  the  cathedral,  and  appears  to  be  a  benefactor,  espe- 
cially in  the  northside  of  the  nave,  where,  on  the  roof,  there  is  still  to  be  seen  and 
viewed,  by  the  curious,  his  coat  of  arms,  the  acorns  on  the  bend  surmounted  of 
the  salmon  fishing,  the  cognizance  of  the  Episcopal  See,  and  adorned  with  a  mitre 
exquisitely  graved  :  but  the  virtues,  goodness,  and  merit  of  this  good  prelate  could 
not  be  confined  within  so  narrow  bounds  as  his  own  diocese,  and  the  public 
could  not  surter  themselves  to  be  deprived  of  his  services,  however  usefully  he 
might  be  employed  in  his  own  station  as  a  bishop  in  the  church;  for  in  the  1468,  an 
embassy  to  Denmark  being  judged  necessary,  not  only  to  cultivate  a  firm  friend- 
ship betwixt  the  two  nations,  but  also  to  treat  with  King  Christiern  of  a  marriage 
betvvixt  the  young  king  and  the  princess,i  the  only  daughter  of  that  monarch;  in 
an  embassy  of  this  importance,  none  was  judged  more  proper  than  the  Bishop  of 
Glasgow.  There  were  joined  with  our  prelate  the  Bishop  of  Orkney,  the  Lord 
Evandale,  the  Chancellor,  the  Earl  of  Arran,  Mr  Martin  Wan  the  king's  almo- 
ner and  confessor,  Gilbert  Rerrick  his  own  arch-deacon  of  Glasgow,  David  Crich- 
ton  of  Cranston,  and  John  Shaw  of  Hallie.  A  prosperous  gale  carried  them 
quickly  to  Copenhagen,  the  capital  city  of  Denmark,  where,  on  the  8th  of  Sep- 
tember, the  marriage  was  agreed  to  on  the  following  terms  :  "  First,  That  the  an- 
"  nual  of  Norway  should  be  for  ever  remitted  and  extinguished  :  Secondly,  That 
"  King  Christiern  should  give  6o,coo  florins  of  gold  for  his  daughter's  portion, 
"  whereof  lo.oco  should  be  paid  before  her  departure  from  Denmark;  and  that  the 
"  islands  of  Orkney  should  be  made  over  to  the  crown  of  Scotland,  by  pledge,  for 
"•  the  security  of  the  remainder,  with  this  express  proviso.  That  they  shall  return 
"  to  that  of  Norway  after  complete  payment  of  the  whole  sum  :  Thirdly,  That 
"  in  case  of  his  dying  before  the  said  Margaret,  his  spouse,  he  should  leave  her  in 
"  possession  of  the  palace  of  Linlithgow,  and  castle  of  Doune  in  Monteith,  with  all 
"  their  appurtenances,  and  the  third  part  of  the  ordinary  revenues  of  the  crown, 
"  to  be  enjoyed  by  her  during  life,  in  case  she  should  choose  to  reside  in  Scotland: 
"  But,  Fourthly,  If  she  rather  inclined  to  return  to  Denmark,  that,  in  lieu  of  the 
*«  said  liferent,  palace,  and  castle,  she  should  accept  of  120,000  florins  of  the  Rhine;. 
"  from  which  sum  the  50,000  due  for  the  remainder  of  her  portion  being  deduced 
"  and  allowed,  the  islands  of  Orkney  shall  be  annexed  to  the  crown  of  Norway 
"  forever.  Fifthly,  That  she  shall  in  no  case  or  event  be  allowed  to  marry  an  Eng- 
"  lishman,  or  any  subject  within  the  jurisdiction  of  England  (Zi)." 

For  some  time  after  the  arrival  and  coronation  of  the  Queen,  Bishop  Muirhead 
seems  to  have  meddled  much  in  those  transactions,  more  than  was  merely  consistent 
with  his  character;  but  confined  himself  to  the  more  private  duties  of  his  function 
and  office  in  ruling  his  clergy,  and  diffusing  his  charity  and  beneficence  through  his 
diocese.  More  particularly  about  this  time,  in  1471,  he  founded,  near  to  the  precinct 
of  his  episcopal  palace  at  Glasgow,  an  hospital,  which  he  dedicated  to  the  honour  of 
St  Nicholas.  The  place  where  the  divine  service  was,  is  of  fine  aisler  work  of  a 
Gothic  form,  and  the  windows  supported  by  a  buttress  betwixt  each  of  them;  upon 
the  front,  over  the  door,  is  the  bishop's  arms  surmounted  of  the  salmon-fish,  and  a 
crosier  or  pastoral  staff  behind  the  shield.  By  the  foundation  I  see  it  was  to  con- 
sist of  twelve  old  men,  who  were  provided  with  all  necessaries  for  their  support  and 
sustenance;  and  also  a  priest  to  celebrate  divine  service  at  the  canonical  hours  of 
devotion,  that  they  might  be  freed  from  worldly  avocations  in  the  decline  of  their 
age,  and  in  a  better  condition  to  prepare  for  another  world,  now  that  they  were  on 
the  brink  of  eternity.  The  foundation  subsisted  till  after  the  reformation  that  the 
payment  of  the  revenue  went  into  desuetude ;  so  that  at  this  time  there  are  not 
above  four  maintained  in  it:  however  it  still  retains  the  name  of  Bishop  Muirhead's 
Hospital,  and  St  Nicholas's  Hospital,  and  is  a  noble  monument  of  its  illustrious 
founder.     Opposite  to  the  hospital  he  built  and  devoted  a  house  or  manse  for  the 


(a)  Chartulary  of  Glasgow,    (b)  Torfceas's  History  of  the  Oikne^f 


26o  APPENDIX. 

priest  or  preceptor,  upon  which  there  is  still  to  be  seen  the  bishop's  arms,  the  cro- 
sier behind  the  shield,  with  the  three  acorns  on  the  bend:  but  whilst  this  excellent 
prelate  was  thus  busied  in  the  offices  of  piety,  beneficence,  and  humanity,  to  his 
distressed  fellow-creatures,  he  was  again  called  to  act  in  a  more  public  sphere  and 
capacity;  for,  in  the  year  1472,  King  Edward  IV.  of  England  being  no  sooner  re- 
settled on  the  English  throne,  but  to  fix  the  Scots  nation  the  more  to  his  interest, 
he  proposed  a  match  betwixt  some  fit  persons  of  the  two  royal  families,  as  a  good 
step  towards  a  lasting  friendship;  and  as  King  James  III.  did  not  seem  averse  from 
it,  so,  in  this  view,  our  prelate  Bishop  Muirheadof  Glasgow,  Bishop  Spence  of  Aber- 
deen, the  Earls  of  Argyle,  Crawford,  and  Caithness,  the  Lords  Hamilton,  Borthwick, 
Seaton,  Darnly,  David  Guthrie,  the  Lord  Register,  and  Duncan  Dundas,  Esq.  were 
named  as  Commissioners :  but  though  they  received  their  respective  commissions 
in  August  1471,  yet  they  did  not  meet  till  the  next  year  1472,  when,  on  the  20th 
of  April,  it  was  agreed,  that  the  present  truce  should  be  observed  till  the  month  of 
July  1483  (a);  but  the  bishop  did  not  see  the  expiration  of  it;  for,  in  about  six  months 
after  the  conclusion  of  the  peace  he  had  been  so  highly  instrumental  in  bringing 
about,  he  died  at  his  palace  in  the  city  of  Glasgow,  on  the  20th  of  November  1473(6), 
and  was  interred  in  the  choir  of  the  Cathedral  Church,  under,  no  doubt,  a  noble 
monument,  suitable  to  the  magnificence  of  so  great  a  prelate,  but  has  been  swept 
clean  away  at  the  Reformation,  with  the  rest  that  were  within  that  stately  edi- 
fice. 

The  death  of  so  good  and  excellent  a  man  w^as  certainly  an  irreparable  loss;  for, 
who  knows,  and  I  am  sure  it  is  very  likely,  but  that  if  our  prelate  had  not  been  in 
his  grave  before  the  unhappy  after-part  of  this  reign,  he  might,  in  his  great  and 
consummate  wisdom  and  prudence,  have  been  happily  instrumental  in  allaying  the 
heats,  rancours,  and  animosities,  that  afterwards  broke  out  and  ended  in  so  dismal  a 
catastrophe.  The  Bishop  had  a  younger  brother,  as  I  take  it,  who  was  educated  to 
the  church,  Mr  Udastus  Muirhead,  who,  after  he  was  in  orders,  was  made  Dean  of 
Glasgow,  a  benefice  then  both  of  great  dignity  and  revenue,  for  he  was  a  prebend 
in  the  chapter  of  the  Episcopal  See  of  Glasgow,  and  Rector  of  Cadyow.  He  was  a 
gentleman  of  figure  and  character  for  learning;  for  he  was  on  the  27th  of  October 
in  the  year  1476,  elected  Rector  of  the  University  of  Glasgow  (r);  but  whether  be 
rose  to  any  higher  station  in  the  church,  or  died  in  his  rectory,  I  have  not  been  able 
to  discover. 

There  was  a  daughter  of  the  House  of  Muirhead  of  Lauchop,  called,  as  it  is  handed 
down,  Janet  Muirhead,  who,  for  her  great  beauty,  was  commonly  called  the  Fair 
Maid,  or,  the  Bonny  Lass  of  Lechbninach,  who  was  married  de  Jacto  privately,  sed 
non  de  jure  secundum  canones,  to  Gavin  Hamilton,  son  to  Sir  James  Hamilton  of  Cad- 
yow, and  brother-gennan  to  James  Lord  Hamilton.  The  marriage,  they  say,  was 
private,  and  the  parties  inter  grades  a  jure  prohibitos,  within  the  degrees  of  consan- 
guinity prohibited  by  the  canons  or  laws  of  the  church ;  and  a  previous  dispensa- 
tion had  not  been  obtained  from  the  Pope  before  the  marriage,  and  the  children  so 
procreate  ex  occulto  et  clandestino  matrimonio,  were  looked  on  as  spurious.  Hovvever, 
this  lady  bore  four  or  five  sons,  and  after  that  he  left  off  cohabitation  with  the 
gentlewoman,  and  went  into  orders,  and  came  to  be  Provost  of  the  Collegiate 
Church  of  Bothwell,  of  the  Earl  of  Douglas's  patronage,  and  is  in  that  office  as  soon 
as  the  year  1453  {d). 

He  does  not  indeed  call  his  children  his  own  sons,  when  he  dispones  the  lands  of 
Orbiston  to  the  eldest,  Mr  Robert  Hamilton,  whom  he  designs  Cancellario  Glasguen. 
that  is.  Rector  of  Campsie,  and  then  to  Thomas  Hamilton,  Canon  of  Dunkeld  ; 
and  failing  him,  to  John  Hamilton  their  carnal  brother;  and  failmg  him,  to  Archibald 
and  Gavm  Hamiltons,  all  brothers  to  one  another,  in  the  1468  (f).  Of  John  Ha- 
milton, the  first  layman  in  the  charter,  is  descended  the  Hamiltons  of  Orbiston, 
Hagg,  Bothwellhaugh,  Innermadden,  Aikenhead  in  Monkland,  Fergusly,  Kilbrack- 
mont,  Monkland,  Dalziel,  Neilsland,  &.c.  But  to  return  to  the  House  of  Lauchop, 
we  may  observe,  that 

(a)  Rymer's  Foedera  Anglije,  ad  annum  1471.  ("i)  Obituary  of  several  of  the  great  men  and  mem- 
bers of  the  chapter  of  Glasgow  in  the  chartulary  of  that  See,  MSS.  at  Paris.  (O  Writs  of  the  CoUege 
of  Glasgow  belonging  to  the  Faculty  I  have  seen,  {d)  Rymer's  Foedera.  {e)  This  charter  is  afterwards 
confirmed  under  the  Great  Seal  in  the  public  archives. 


APrEXDIX.  :i63 

William  MuiRHEADot"L;iiichop,  the  elder  brother  of  the  Bishop  oFGlasgow,  mar- 
ried Mariota   Haiuihon  (.v),    daughter   of  Hamilton   of  by 

whom  he  had  John,  who  was  the  lieir  of  the  House  of  Lauchop;  and  a  younger 

Dr  Richard  Muirhead,  who  was,  by  the  care  of  his  uncle  the  Bishop  of  Glas- 
gow, bred  to  the  service  of  the  church;  and,  getting  into  orders,  was  preferred  to 
the  deanery  of  Glasgow,  which  was  a  benefice  both  of  considerable  dignity  and  re- 
venue, being  the  first  member  of  the  chapter  of  the  Episcopal  See  of  Glasgow,  who 
had  the  second  vote,  next  to  the  bishop  himself.  The  Dean  being  a  person  of 
learning,  merit,  and  integrity.  King  James  IV.  was  pleased,  from  a  confidence  in 
his  abilities  and  sulliciency,  to  make  him  Lord  Clerk-Register  of  Scotland,  or  Clerk 
and  Keeper  of  his  iNIajesty's  Council,  Registers,  and  Rolls,  the  21st  of  June  1489  (/'), 
upon  the  removal  of  Dr  Alexander  Inglis,  Archdeacon  of  St  Andrews  (r),  Elect  of 
Duiikeld.  He  held  this  great  office,  huving  the  charge  of  the  whole  registers  of 
the  kingdom  in  his  custody,  for  the  space  and  time  of  five  years,  till  the  1493, 
that  he  resigned  in  favour  of  Dr  John  Frissel,  or  Fraser,  Dean  of  the  Royal  College 
Church  at  Restalrig  (rf).  The  removal  of  the  Dean  of  Glasgow,  Dr  Muuhead,  does 
not  seem  to  have  flowed  from  any  disregard  or  dislike  to  his  conduct  in  the  ad- 
ministration of  his  great  otfice,  but  rather  to  do  him  the  greater  honour;  for  while 
he  was  the  Clerk-Register,  it  was  concerted  in  Parliament,  that  certain  great  men 
of  the  clergy,  as  well  as  of  the  laity,  should  be  sent  to  several  different  courts  to 
solicit  for  a  consort  to  the  young  king  their  master,  which  was  a  matter  of  the  last 
consequence  to  the  kingdom,  the  king  being  then  nineteen,  and  the  only  person 
of  his  family.  The  persons  employed  were  Robert,  Bishop  of  Glasgow;  this  was 
Bishop  Blackadder,  thereafter  the  first  archbishop  of  that  See,  Bishop  Elphinstone 
of  Aberdeen,  the  Earl  of  Bothwell,  the  Earl  of  Morton,  the  Lord  Glammis,  WiUiam, 
Prior  of  St  John  of  Jerusalem  in  Scotland,  Lawrence  Lord  Oliphant,  and  our  Dean,. 
Mr  Richard  Muirhead,  Dean  of  Glasgow  (e).  They  were  to  go  to  the  courts  of 
France,  England,  Castile,  Arragon,  Sicily,  &c.  But  it  was  a  while  after  this  that 
the  king's  marriage  with  the  daughter  of  England  was  completed,  in  which  the 
Archbishop  of  Glasgow  was  the  great  and  happy  instrument;  and  it  appears  to  me 
more  than  probable,  that  his  dean,  Dr  Muirhead,  had  a  share  in  that  great  transac- 
tion that  has  had  such  mighty  effects,  and  laid  not  only  the  foundation  of  the 
union  of  the  crowns,  but  also  of  the  two  kingdoms  in  our  own  time.  Dr  Muir- 
head, by  his  prudent  conduct  and  just  administration  in  his  office  while  Clerk- 
Register,  procured  a  general  esteem,  and  he  had  got  so  much  into  the  king's  con- 
fidence and  favour  that  he  preferred  him  to  be  Secretary  of  State  in  the  1495  (/),. 
in  place  of  Dr  Inglis,  the  Archdeacon  of  St  Andrews,  who  was  both  Secretary  and 
Clerk  of  the  Register,  Secretariiu,  ac  Clericus  Rotulorwn  et  Ri'ghtri  Regis  Scotiae, 
as  he  is  designed.  The  great  abilities  and  eminent  qualities  of  the  Dean  of  Glas- 
gow, in  this  high  station,  coming  to  be  more  and  better  known  and  displayed,  in 
the  necessary  discharge  and  dispatches  of  his  office,  the  king  was  pleased  to  make 
him  one  of  his  Privy  Council.  This  appears  from  an  instrument  taken  within  the 
Cathedral  Church  of  Glasgow,  where  the  king  was  present  on  the  loth  of  Decem- 
ber 1502,  when  he  was  obhged,  as  was  usual,  to  give  his  oath  to  observe  the  late 
treaty  with  England,  before  a  great  many  of  the  nobiUty  and  gentry  of  both  na- 
tions; among  whom  were  Ricardus  Muirhead,  Decanus  Ecclesia  Glasgtiensis,  dicti- 
que  Regis  Scotorum,  Consiliario  et  Secretario  (^).  The  king's  marriage  quickly  fol- 
lowing on  the  peace,  with  the  Princess  Margaret,  eldest  daughter  of  King 
Henry  VII.  pursuant  to  an  article  of  the  agreement,  the  queen's  jointure  was 

(a)  Note  of  the  Genealogy  of  the  House  of  Muirhead.  (A)  Charta  of  that  date  that  he  is  in  the 
Register's  Office,  Clericus  Rotulorum  &  Registri,  ac  Concilii  Clericus.  (c)  Charta  in  archivls.  l^d)  This 
year  1403,  2^th  June,  is  the  precise  year  that  Mr  Frisle,  the  Dean  of  Restalrig,  is  made  Register,  and 
is  so  designed  in  the  Fredera  Angliie,  in  a  treaty  with  the  English,  and  also  in  the  registers  of  the  Great 
Seal  in  the  archives,  (f)  Rymer's  Fcedera  Anglise,  the  14th  June  1491.  {f)  In  a  commission  to  go  to 
England,  8th  July  1494,  among  others  there  is  the  Archdeacon  of  St  Andrews,  Secretarium  ctiam 
Clericum  Registri  Jacobi  Scotorum  Regis,  and  this  Dr  Muirhead  is  in  the  office  then.  { g\  Rymer't 
FcEdera  Anglix',  ad  annum  1502. 

Vol.  U.  7  D 


262  APPENDIX. 

settled  on  the  4th  of  May  1503  (rt),  to  which  there  are  witncbsts,  Archibald  Tari 
of  Argyle,  Ma^ister  Hospitii,  Master  of  the  Household,  Andrew  Lord  Gray,  Jus- 
titiatio  nostro,  says  the  sovereign,  Magister  Ricardus  Midrhead  Decano  Glasguen. 
Secretario  nostra,  Gaviiio  Dunbar  Decano  Moravien.  Clerico  nostrorum  Rotulorum  et 
Registri  (/>). 

As  the  Secretary,  Dean  Muirhead,  has  been  a  learned  man  in  that  which  was 
more  peculiar  to  his  own  profession  of  theology,  so  he  has  been  well  known  in  the 
civil  and  canon  law,  insomuch  that  he  was  made  one  of  the  Lords  of  Council  and 
Session  by  King  James  IV.  anno  150?.,  who  were  the  ordinary  judges  of  law  and 
equity  before  the  institution  of  the  College  of  Justice,  which  did  not  commence 
till  the  next  succeeding  reign,  anno  153a.  There  is  a  decreet  still  extant,  whereby 
a  service  of  John  Lord  Somerville,  as  heir  to  William  Somerville,  his  father,  is  re- 
duced, because  his  father  had  been  vested  and  seised  in  the  half  of  the  lands  of 
Gilmerton,  proceeding  on  a  charter  from.  Malise  Earl  of  Monteith,  who  had  no 
right  either  in  property  or  superiority  to  the  said  lands  (c).  The  Dean  of  Glas- 
gow, in  the  extract,  is  mentioned  among  the  rest  of  the  Lords.  He  continued 
Secretary  for  about  the  space  of  eleven  years,  without  any  interruption,  or  the 
least  visible  diminution  of  favour  from  his  prince,  till  his  death  in  the  1506,  that  Dr 
Patrick  Panter,  then  Rector  of  Fetteresso,  and  Preceptor  of  the  Maison  Dieu 
Hospital  at  Brechin,  afterwards  the  learned  Abbot  of  Cambuskenneth  was  prefer- 
red to  the  office  (rf). 

But  to  return  to  my  subject,  the  memorial  of  the  House  of  Muirhead,  John 
Muirhead  of  Lauchop  and  Bullis,  the  next  in  the  line  and  course  of  succession  in 
this  ancient  family,  was  tacksman  and  kindly  rentaller,  or  rather  feuar  of  many  of 
the  crown  lands  of  Galloway,  which  he  possessed  till  his  death,  that  he  was  slain 
fighting  by  the  side  of  his  royal  master  King  James  IV.  in  canipo  belli  de  Nor- 
tkumhtrland,  sub  vexillo  Domini  Regis,  as  it  is  generally  called  in  many  records,  and 
which  is  well  known  was  the  battle  of  Flodden,  which  was  fought  the  9th  of  Sep- 
tember 1513  (f);  and  it  is  certain  that  the  possessions  of  the  family  of  the  Muir- 
heads  were  at  this  time  as  valuable  as  those  they  had  in  Clydesdale  or  Lanarkshire. 
This  gentleman  left  issue  by  Margaret,  his  wife,  daughter  of  Patrick  Lord  Hep- 
burn of  Hailes,  and  sister  to  Patrick  Earl  of  Bothwell  (/),  John,  his  son  and  heir  (^), 
who  married  Margaret  Borthwick,  daughter  to  the  Lord  Borthwick,  then  an  opu- 
lent noble  family  as  any  in  all  the  kingdom  in  the  rank  and  quality  of  Parliamen- 
tary barons  {h),  and  had  James,  the  heir  of  the  House  of  Muirhead  and  family  of 
Lauchop,  who  married  Jean,  daughter  of  John  Lord  Fleming  (/),  ancestor  to  the 
present  Earl  of  Wigton;  by  whom  he  had  two  sons,  James  Muirhead  of  Lauchop, 
the  heir  of  the  family,  and  John  Muirhead  of  Shawfoot,  a  younger  brother,  who 
was  a  feuar  under  the  Archbishop  of  Glasgow,  Archbishop  Dunbar  {k),  of  whom 
is  descended  the  Muirheads  of  Bredisholm,  in  the  county  of  Lanark,  who,  since  the 
deathofCaptainJamesMuirheadof  Lauchop,  in  the  endofthei738,  withoutanymale 
issue  of  his  body,  is  now  the  lineal  lawful  heir-male  of  the  House  of  Lauchop;  and 
the  undoubted  chief  and  representative  of  the  ancient  family  of  Muirhead  is  John 
Muirhead  of  Bredisholm,  who,  though  lie  wore  in  his  arms  a  crescent  before,  as 
a  mark  of  cadency,  intimating  his  descent,  as  a  second  brother,  from  the  stem  and 
root  of  the  family,  yet  now  he  may  lay  it  aside,  as  he  has  a  just  title  to  do,  seeing, 
as  heir-male,  he  represents  the  principal  family.  This  James  Muirhead  of  Lauchop 
had  also  a  daughter,  Margaret,  who  was  married  to  James  Hamilton  of  Woodhall, 
Captain  of  Arran,  and  had  issue  (/). 

(a)  Rymer's  Fcedera  Angliae.  {h)  Ibidem,  (c)  In  the  original  decreet,  among  tlie  lords  there  is 
Mr  Richhtd  Muirhead,  Dean  of  Glasgow,  Secretary.  (</)  Dean  Muirhead  of  Glasgow  is  secretary  in 
the  charters  of  the  Great  Seal  1496,  1497,  149'^,  I499>  1500,  1501,  1502,  1503,  &c.  rcj/ifrt/W  till 
his  death.  In  the  chartulary  of  the  writs  of  the  college  of  Glasgow,  in  I  51  2,  Dean  Muirhead  is  de- 
signed venerabi/is  memorise,  which  imports  he  was  dead  some  time  before,  (c)  Rolls  of  the  Exchequer 
in  the-  rejis'ers.  {f'l  Draught  of  the  descent  and  lineage  of  the  Muirheads  of  Lauchop,  MSS. 
{g)  Ticks  from  the  crown  to  John  Muirhead,  son  and  heir  of  John  Muirhead,  in  1517,  in  the  Ex- 
cheqiip-  Rolls.  (A)  Biithbrieve  in  the  registers  of  the  Great  Seal.  (/)  Birthbrieve  to  a  gentleman  de- 
scended of  the  Haust  of  Lauchop,  in  the  registers  of  the  Great  Seal  in  the  public  records,  {i)  The  Ge- 
nealogical Draught  of  the  Muirheads  of  Lauchop,  MSS.  (/)  Charta  penes  Joan-  Crawfiird  de  Jordaa- 
iiill,  ad  annum  1539,  and  1540. 


APPENDIX.  263 

This  Ja.mes  MuiRHEAD,  the  younger  of  Lauchop,  married  Janet,  daughter  of  Alex- 
ander Raillie  of  Cavphin  («_),  an  ancient  family  of  the  Bailhcs,  as  far  back  as  the 
reign  of  King  David  11.,  in  the  county  of  Lanark,  l)y  whom  lie  had  a  son,  the  heir 
of  the  family,  viz. 

James  Muiruead  of  Lauchop,  who  being  linked  in  friendship,  blood,  and  affinity 
with  the  Hamiltons,  did  stick  firm  to  Queen  Maiy  when  she  fell  in  her  troubles ; 
for  how  soon  that  misfortunate  princess  tiad  found  means  to  make  her  escape  out 
of  the  castle  of  Lochleven,  where  a  party  of  her  undutiful  subjects  had  shut  her  up, 
and  came  to  Hamilton,  this  loyal  gentleman  repaired  with  his  friends  and  followers 
to  her  standard,  how  soon  it  was  set  up,  and  marched  to  the  battle  of  Langside,  in 
order  to  recover  and  restore  her  to  her  liberty  and  sovereignty  ;  but  that  attempt 
proving  unsuccessful,  by  the  defeat  of  the  army  on  the  13th  of  May  1568,  he  was 
forfeited  by  a  Parliamentary  attainder  for  that  dutiful  and  loyal  appearance  (^b)  : 
However,  he  still  continued  in  the  queen's  interest,  and  did  some  pieces  of  very 
acceptable  service  on  that  side  :  It  is  confidently  reported,  and  I  believe  there  is 
no  ground  to  doubt  the  truth  of  the  fact,  that  the  Laird  of  Lauchop,  being  a  bold 
and  intrepid  man,  received  and  sheltered  James  Hamilton  of  Botiiwelhaugh  the 
night  he  fled  from  Hamilton,  after  he  had  shot  the  Earl  of  Murray,  the  Regent,  at 
Linlithgow,  the  29th  of  January  1570.  The  next  day  he  went  along  with  Mr  Ha- 
milton himself;  but  the  party  who  were  sent  to  pursue  him,  hearing  he  had  stopt 
at  the  house  of  Lauchop,  they  first  rifled  it,  and  then  set  it  on  fire,  and  burnt  it  to 
the  ground  ;  and  perhaps  the  regent's  party  were  not  a  whit  less  set  on  in  their  re- 
sentment, that  the  Lady  Lauchop  was  sister  to  Bothwelhaugh,  who  had  slain  their 
master,  and  whose  death  they  were  seeking  to  revenge.  The  forfeiture  continued 
on  the  family  of  Lauchop  till  the  general  act  of  pacification  amongst  the  two  con- 
tending parties  came  to  be  finally  settled  on  the  23d  of  February  1573,  at  Perth  ; 
whereby,  in  pursuance  of  an  article  of  agreement,  it  was  declared  and  decerned, 
"  That  the  sentences  past  be  doom  and  forfaulture  in  Parliament,  or  anie  other 
"  sentence  past  before  the  Justice-General  or  his  deputes,  since  the  15th  day  of 
"  June  1567,  shall  be  of  no  avail,  force,  strength,  or  effect  in  all  time  coming." 
In  this  act  there  are  a  long  roll  of  persons  who  had  been  engaged  in  the  rebellion 
against  the  young  king,  who  are  all  now  remitted  and  restored  ;  and  among  the  rest 
this  gentleman,  James  Muirhead  of  Lauchop  (c),  was  one.  He  married  Janet  Ha- 
milton, daughter  of  James  Hamilton  of  Bothwelhaugh,  who  was  a  brother  of  the 
House  of  Orbiston  fdj,  by  whom  he  had  issue  James,  his  successor,  and  a  younger 
son,  Thomas  Muirhead  of  Johnston,  who  married  Elizabeth  Hamilton,  daughter 
of Hamilton  of  Bathgate  (<?),  whose  heir-female,  Margaret  Muir- 
head, was  married  to  John  Crawfurd  of  Milnton,  whose  grandchild  and  sole  heir,. 
Dame  Margaret  Crawfurd,  was  married  to  Sir  William  Stewart  of  Castlemilk.  This 
Laird  of  Lauchop,  by  Janet  Hamilton  his  wife,  daughter  to  Bothwelhaugh,  had  a 
daughter,  Margaret,  who  was  married  to  John  Hamilton  of  Udston  (/),  of  whom 
there  issued  a  numerous  progeny,  which  diffused  through  all  Clydesdale,  in  rela- 
tions ;  for,  from  this  marriage  sprang  the  Hamiltons  of  Udston,  the  Hamiltons  of 
Barncluith,  and  the  Lord  Belhaven,  the  Hamiltons  of  Rosehall  and  Wishaw,  &-c. 
Elizabeth  was  married  to  William  Cleland  of  Faskine,  mother  to  Sir  James  Cleland 
of  Monkland. 

James  Muirhead  of  Lauchop,  the  next  in  the  succession  of  this  ancient  and  ho- 
nourable family,  had  the  honour  of  knighthood  conferred  on  him  by  King  James 
VI.  in  the  1617,  or  rather  in  1621.  He  married  first  Jean,  daughter  and  sole  heir 
of  James  Houston  of  Craigton,  in  the  county  of  Dumbarton,  who  was  a  brother  of 
the  ancient  family  of  Houston  of  that  Ilk,  in  the  shire  of  Renfrew,  and  his  wife 
was  Margaret  Fleming,  daughter  of  Patrick  Fleming  of  Barrochan  (^f),  by  whom 
he  had  James  his  son  and  heir,  Mr  Thomas  a  clergyman,  who  was  minister  at  Cam- 
busnethan,  and  daughters  married  to  Alexander  Garthshore  of  that  Ilk,  in  the  county 

(a)  Birthbrieve  of  the  House  of  Lauchop  in  the  records,  (i)  I  find  James  Muirhead  of  Lauchop  forfeited, 
among  others,  in  the  Regent's  Parliament,  in  the  records  of  the  Privy  Seal  in  1568,  in  the  registers. 
(f_)  IVIemoirs  of  the  affairs  in  Scotland,  page  287,  by  Mr  David  Crawfurd  younger  of  Drumsoy.  pub- 
lished in  the  year  1706.  W)  The  birthbiieve  of  the  gentlemen  of  the  House  of  Lauchop,  in  the  registers  in 
the  Chancery,  (c)  Account  of  the  House  of  Lauchop,  by  one  Mr  Hamilton,  MSS.  penes  me.  (/)  Char- 
ter to  them  in  the  registers,  in  isq^.     (^)  Birthbiieve  in  the  register. 


364  APPENDIX. 

of  Dumbarton,  another  to  Mr  John  Crawfurd  of  Ruchsolloch,  in  the  county  of 
Lanark,  another  to Baillie  of  Polkemmet. 

He  married  to-his  second  lady  Dame  Margaret  Somerville,  daughter  of  Sir  James 
Somerville  of  Cambusnethan,  and  rehct  and  widow  of  Gilbert  Lord  Somerville  : 
But  whether  he  had  any  issue  of  the  marriage  1  am  not  positive. 

James  Muirhe.\d  of  Lauchop,  his  son,  was  married  with  Lady  Jean  Dalziel,  daugh- 
ter of  Robert  Lord  Dalziel,  and  afterwards  Earl  of  Carnwath,  by  whom  he  had  se- 
veral children  ;  James,  the  eldest,  he  conceived  a  prejudice  against,  upon  no 
other  consideration  than  a  piece  of  humour,  and  an  extravagant  fondness  for  a 
younger  son  ;  he  disinherited  his  eldest,  and  diverted  the  right  of  succession,  ac- 
cording to  the  rules  of  primogeniture,  from  him  to  a  younger  brother  :  But  to 
make  that  nevertheless  as  easy  to  him  as  possible,  he  gave  him  the  estate  of  Craig- 
ton.  He  married  a  daughter  of  Patrick  Lindsay,  Archbishop  of  Glasgow ;  but 
though  he  had  a  son,  his  male  succession  is  quite  worn  out ;  and  a  daughter,  of 
whom  there  is  still  some  issue  remaining. 

Claud  Muirhead  was  the  second  son,  to  whom  he  provided  the  fee  of  his  estate 
of  Lauchop,  which  was  then  considerable.  I  have  heard  from  the  relations  of  the 
family,  who  were  persons  of  such  honour  and  integrity  as  1  could  well  trust  to,  that 
this  Claud  Muirhead,  Lauchop's  second  son,  was  indeed  a  fine,  pohte,  handsome, 
well-bred  gentleman,  as  any  in  the  kingdom.  He  travelled  for  his  improvement 
far  into  France  and  Italy,  where  he  contracted  a  close  and  intimate  friendship 
with  some  eminent  men  of  the  popish  clergy,  who  influenced  him,  from  the  com- 
mon topics  and  arguments  they  urge  of  the  unity  and  infallibity  of  the  church, 
meaning  their  own  church  of  Rome,  to  become  their  convert,  and  embrace  the 
Roman  Catholic  communion  ;  but  that  was  not  the  worst  effect  his  change  had, 
if  he  had  kept  it  a  private  thing  betwixt  God  and  his  own  conscience  ;  but,  upon 
his  return  home,  his  old  parents  were  so  captivated  with  the  qualities  of  their  fa- 
vourite and  charming  son,  as  they  thought  him,  that  they  received  all  his  senti- 
ments with  that  submission  as  he  had  been  an  angel  sent  from  heaven.  When 
he  came  to  talk  to  them  of  the  motives  that  had  induced  him,  and  prevailed  on 
him  to  change  his  religion,  he  spoke  in  such  a  strain  of  conviction  on  their  con- 
sciences, that  they  were  soon  brought  over  to  the  popish  side,  though  I  have  it 
from  those  who  were  their  relations,  and  had  access  to  know  the  truth  of  it,  that 
when  his  parents  made  the  change  they  were  above  fourscore  years ;  and  all  or 
most  of  the  sons  became  Roman  Catholics ;  at  least  I  have  heard  it  went  through 
most  of  the  family.  This  fine  gentleman,  that  was  the  instrument  of  perverting 
all  his  father's  house,  married  with  another  Roman  Catholic  family,  Wauchope  of 
Niddry,  by  whom  he  had  a  son,  John,  who  died  married ;  but  there  was  no  issue 
of  the  marriage  ;  and  was  observed,  that  though  the  family  was,  at  the  old  man's 
death,  in  a  flourishing  condition,  yet  it  so  visibly  melted  away,  that  but  little  of 
the  fortune  was  remaining  when  it  came  to  the  youngest  brother,  Gavin  Muir- 
head of  Lauchop,  who  married  Janet  Douglas,  daughter  of  William  Earl  of  Selkirk, 
afterwards  Duke  of  Hamilton,  by  whom  he  had  two  sons,  Wilham,  a  young  gentle- 
man, who  went  into  the  army  young,  was  a  proper  handsome  person,  rose  soon 
to  a  command,  but  died  of  his  wounds  he  received  at  Wynendale  ;  Captain  James, 
the  second  son,  parted  with  any  small  remainder  of  the  estate,  and  going  also  into 
the  army,  came  to  be  a  captain  in  the  Earl  of  Orkney's  regiment,  in  which  he 
continued,  after  it  was,  on  the  Earl's  demise,  given  to  Colonel  Sinclair ;  in  which 
station  he  died  in  the  end  of  the  1738  in  Ireland,  leaving  no  issue,  save  two  daugh- 
ters ;  so  that,  upon  the  absolute  failure  of  all  the  House  of  Lauchop,  in  the  male 
line,  that  were  descended  to  James  Muirhead  of  Lauchop,  the  loyal  man  under 
Queen  Maiy,  the  right  of  representing  this  ancient  family  devolves  to  the  last 
heir-male,  John  Muirhead  of  Bredisholm,  who  is  now  considered,  and  justly 
entitled,  to  be  chief  of  the  name  of  Muirhead,  as  coming  in  place  of  the  House 
of  Lauchop,  and  accordingly  has  right  to  the  armorial  bearing  of  that  family, 
without  the  crescent,  the  brotherly  difference,  but  simple,  with  the  crest  and 
motlo. 

Now,  to  make  this  memorial  full  and  complete,  we  shall  return  back  to  the 
youuger^branch  of  the  family  of  Lauchop,  that  laid  first  the  foundation  of  the  Muir- 


APPENDIX.  :65 

heads  of  Bredisholm,  wlio  >nre  now  turned  out  to  be  the  iien-in;ile  ol  the  fumily  of 
Lauchop  tliemselves.  Their  predecessor  then,  as  we  heretofore  took  notice  of,  was 
Jolin  Muirhead  of  Shawfutte,  second  son  of  John  Muirhead  of  Laueliop  by  Jean  his 
Wife,  daughter  of  John  Lord  Fleininj;;.  Tliis  gentleman,  by  his  discretion,  con- 
duct, and  prudence,  in  the  managing  his  affairs,  acquired  a  competent  estate  with- 
in the  barony  and  regality  of  Glasgow,  in  vassallage  of  the  archbishops  of  that  See. 
His  first  wife  was  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  Crawfurd  of  Ferni,  a  right  ancient  fami- 
ly (rt)  in  Lanarkshire,  that  had  subsisted  from  the  time  of  K.ing  Robert  111.  (A)  in 
the  county  of  Lanark,  near  to  Rutherglen,  and  after  that,  Jean  Oliphant,  daugnter 
of  Sir  Alexander  Olipiiant  of  Kelly,  in  the  county  of  tife,  the  first  cadet  and 
branch  of  the  family  of  Oliphant  (c).  His  son,  also  of  the  name  of  John,  allied 
with  the  Oliphants  of  Kelly  ;  and  being,  as  his  father,  a  gentleman  of  spirit,  and 
application  to  frugality,  he  ac(|uired  from  Archbishop  Spottiswood  the  lands  of 
Bredisholm,  which  is  confirmed  by  a  charter  under  the  Great  Ssal  the  first  of 
March  1607  (</),  the  year  just  after  the  bishops  were  restored  by  Act  of  Parliament 
to  the  temporality  of  their  Sees  (^f  J.  He  was  succeeded  by  his  son  and  heir  James 
Muirhead  of  Bredisholm,  who,  like  his  father  and  grandfather,  was  a  gentleman 
that  had  a  peculiar  turn  and  talent  to  frugality  and  management,  and  by  that 
means  he  raised  up  a  good  estate  ;  and  this,  doubtless,  enabled  him  to  make  a 
very  noble  and  illustrious  alliance  ;  for  he  married  Margaret  Drummond,  daughter 
of  James,  Commendator  of  InchafFry,  second  son  of  David  Lord  Drummond,  and 
Dame  Lilias  Ruthven  his  wife,  daughter  of  William  Lord  Ruthven,  ancestor  to 
the  Earls  of  Gowrie.  He  was,  after  that,  by  the  special  favour  of  King  James, 
created  Lord  Maderty  in  1607.  The  lady's  own  mother  was  Jean,  daughter  of 
Sir  James  Chisholm  of  Creuch,  an  ancient,  and  then  a  great  family  in  Perthshire, 
near  Dumblane.  The  marriage  is  with  consent  of  John  Lord  Maderty,  and  Sir 
James  Drummond  of  Machany,  her  brother-german,  and  several  other  of  hei-  noble 
relations,  as  was  then  usual  (/) ;  by  this  noble  lady  he  had  two  sons  and  a  daugh- 
ter, viz. 

James,  his  eldest  son  and  successor ; 

I\Ir  John  Muirhead,  whom  he  bred  to  the  law,  was  an  advocate  before  the  Court 
of  Session  ;  he  was  the  ancestor  of  that  branch  of  the  Muirheads  of  Persilands,  in 
the  shire  of  Lanark  ; 

Dame  Lilias,  his  eldest  daughter,  was  first  married  to  Sir  Walter  Stewart  of 
Minto,  then  a  family  of  great  reputation  for  quality  and  estate  near  Glasgow, 
which  is  now  represented  by  the  Lord  Blantyre,  and  after  his  death  to  another 
very  honourable  gentleman,  who  was  the  lady's  own  first  cousin,  viz.  Sir  James 
Drummond  of  Machany  f^),  grandfather  to  the  present  Viscount  of  Strathallan 
and  Lord  Maderty. 

James  Muirhead  of  Bredisholm,  the  next  in  the  line  of  succession  of  this  family, 
married  first  Grissel,  daughter  of  Robert  Hamilton  of  Bathgate  (/>),  who  was  sprung 
lineally  from  Sir  William  Hamilton,  younger  son  to  Sir  David  Hamilton  of  Cad- 
yow  (i),  ancestor  to  the  Duke  of  Hamilton.  The  lady's  mother  was  Margaret, 
daughter  of  Sir  Alexander  Hamilton  of  Innerwick,  by  whom  he  had  James,  the 
eldest  son  and  heir,  George  Muirhead  of  Stevenson  in  Bothwell,  whose  male  issue 
is  extinct ;  he  had  also  one  daughter,  Elizabeth,  who  was  married  to  Patrick  Ha- 
milton of  Neilsland,  and  had  issue. 

He  married  to  his  second  wife  Grissel,  daughter  of  James  Hamilton  of  Westport, 
near  Linlithgow,  descended  from  the  Hamiltons  of  Silvertonhill,  widow  and  relict 
of  William  Cochran,  son  and  apparent  heir  of  Alexander  Cochran  of  Barbachlay  in 
the  county  of  Linlithgow  (k),  by  whom  he  had  one  daughter  Margaret,  who  was 
married  to  James  Hamilton  of  Aikenhead,  in  the  shire  of  Lanark  (/),  and  had  issue. 

He  married  to  his  third  wife  Bessie,  daughter  of  James  Crawfurd  of  Kipbyre  in 
Lanarkshire  (rn),  by  whom  he  had  two  daughters;  Lilias,  who  was  married  to  James 

(a)  Genealogical  draught  of  the  Muitheads.  (i)  Writs  of  the  House  of  Ferm.  (r)  Writs  of  the  House 
ef  Oliphant,  in  the  custody  of  Laurence  Oliphant  of  Gask.  (d)  Charta  penes  Bredisholm.  («■)  Acts  of 
Parliament.  (_/)  Original  contract  ye:  extant  in  Bredisholm's  hands,  (g)  Contract  and  marriage  ar- 
ticles in  the  custody  of  Bredisholm.  (A)  Ibid.  (/)  Charta  in  archivis',  ad  annum  1407.  (,f)  Ibid-. 
(l)  Ibidem,     (m)  Charta  penes  Bredisholm. 

Vol.  n.  7  E 


265  APPENDIX. 

Hamilton  of  Blantyrefarm.  and  had  issue  ;  and  Anne  to  John  Stark  of  Auchinvole 
and  Gartsherry,  and  hand  issue. 

JAMES  MuiRAEAD  of  Bicdishohn  was  a  very  worthy  gentleman,  well  esteemed, 
a  person  of  great  goodness,  uprightness,  and  integrity,  he  married  a  lady  of  a  noble 
extraction,  as  we  see  some  of  his  ancestors  had  done  before  him,  viz.  Mrs  Helen 
Stewart,  daughter  of  Alexander,  fourth  Lord  Blantyre.  Her  mother  was  Margaret, 
only  daughter  of  John  Shaw  of  Greenock,  and  of  Helen  his  wife,  daughter  of  Sir 
John  Houston  of  that  Ilk,  by  whom  he  had  James,  who  died  in  the  hfetime  of  his 
father,  John  his  successor,  William  and  George,  both  bred  to  the  practice  of  the 
law,  Walter,  who  all  three  died  unmarried.     He  had  also  two  daughters, 

EuPHAME,  the  eldest,  who  was  married  to  Archibald  Grossett  of  Logic,  and  had 
issue. 

Margaret,  to  John  Stark  of  Auchinvole  and  Gartsherry,  and  had  issue. 

John  Muirhead,  now  of  Bredisholm,  since  the  demise  lately  of  Captain  James 
Muirhead  of  Lauchop,  is  now  the  heir-male,  and  of  consequence  the  chief  and  re- 
presentative of  the  family  of  Lauchop  ;  which  I  may  venture  to  say,  is  one  of  the 
most  ancient  families  in  all  Lanarkshire.  He  married  Lilias,  eldest  daughter  of 
James  Hamilton  of  Aikenhead  ;  but  as  he  has  no  issue,  and  but  little  hopes  of  any, 
iiis  nephew,  by  his  eldest  sister  the  deceased  Lady  Logie,  Walter  Grossett  of  Logic, 
Esq.  is  his  presumptive,  if  I  may  not  call  him  his  apparent  heir,  who,  in  that 
event,  is  to  assume  the  arms  of  Muirhead,  the  simple  coat,  as  his  uncle  now  bears 
it,  which  probably  he  may  think  fit  to  marshal  in  the  first  and  fourth  quarter  of 
his  armorial  achievement.  Since  there  is  then  apparently  so  natural  a  connection 
betwixt  Mr  Grossett  of  Logie  and  the  Muirheads  of  Bredisholm,  I  shall  here  but 
just  touch  a  little  at  the  origin  and  progress  of  that  name  in  a  very  few  words. 
I  concur  in  my  opinion  with  those  who  think  the  surname  and  family  of  Grossett 
to  be  of  a  French  extraction,  and  of  a  family  of  eminency  there,  Grosier,  and  who 
bear  the  same  armorial  figures  in  their  arms  as  those  of  the  surname  of  Grossett  do; 
the  variation  is  very  little  ;  and  the  identity  of  one  and  the  same  armorial  bearing 
is  the  very  surest  mark  of  blood  and  descent,  as  the  heralds  observe.  It  is  an 
agreed  point  amongst  the  heralds,  that  the  besants  were  acquired  by  those  who 
had  signalized  themselves  in  the  crusades  in  the  Holy  War  against  the  infidels.  That 
the  ancestors  of  the  Grossetts  of  Logie  are  but  lately  extracted  from  France  is  most 
certain.  Captain  Alexander  Grossett  came  over  from  France,  and  served  King 
Charles  I.  in  the  army,  and  had  the  reputation  of  a  gentleman  of  honour,  virtue, 
and  probity.  After  the  war  was  at  an  end,  he  settled  in  Scotland,  and  died  there, 
leaving  behind  him  a  son,  Alexander  Grossett,  Esq;  who  purchased  the  lands  of 
Logie  near  Dunfermhne  ;  but  being  high  in  the  presbyterian  principles,  and  those 
people  being  much  depressed  in  the  late  times,  that  he  might  freely  enjoy  the  ex- 
ercise of  his  religion,  he  retired  over  to  Holland,  where  he  died,  leaving  issue  by 
Christian  Cochran  his  wife,  of  the  ancient  family  of  the  Cochrans  of  Barbachly, 
who  can,  by  well  vouched  documents,  carry  up  their  pedigree  to  the  time  of  King 
David  II.  if  not  further,  only  one  son,  his  heir, 

Archibald  Grossett,  Esq.  who  married  Euphame,  eldest  daughter  of  James 
Muirhead  of  Bredisholm,  in  the  county  of  Lanark,  and  of  Helen  his  wife,  daugh- 
ter of  Alexander  Lord  Blantyre,  by  whom  he  had  three  sons, 

Walter  Grossett  of  Logie,  Esq.  Collector  of  his  Majesty's  Customs,  Salt-duty, 
and  excise,  at  the  port  of  Alloa,  in  the  county  of  Clackmanan,  and  one  of  the 
Justices  of  the  Peace  of  that  shire ; 

Captain  Alexander  Grossett,  the  second  son,  is  Captain  in  General  Clayton's 
regiment  ; 

James  Grossett,  Esq.  the  third  son,  is  a  merchant  at  Lisbon  in  Portugal,  a 
gentleman  of  reputation,  and  a  rising  young  man  that  way. 

The  armorial  bearing  of  Grossett  of  Logie  is  azure,  three  stars  or  mullets  dis- 
posed fesse-vvays,  argent,  and  in  base  of  the  stars  as  many  besants  or,  of  the  se- 
cond ;  which  coat  he  may  carry,  on  the  event  of  his  uncle  Bredisholm's  death,  in 
the  first  and  fourth  quarter  of  the  achievement  of  that  family. 


■z67 


Of  the  family  of  DUNDAS  of  Fingask,  formerly  designed  of  that 
Ilk  and  Fingask.. 


AS  the  former  memorial  of  the  family  of  Dundas  of  that  Ilk,  inserted  in  this  Ap- 
pendix, contains  several  assertions,  for  which  no  document  is  adduced,  and  some  of 
them  contrary  to  fict ;  and  deduces  the  succession  of  the  family  since  the  reign  of 
King  James  II.  from  a  collateral  branch,  and  not  the  lineal  heir,  thereby  insinu- 
ating that  the  present  Laird  of  Dundas  is  the  representative  of  the  ancient  family, 
in  prejudice  of  the  family  we  now  treat  of,  which  undoubtedly  is  so  ;  they  have 
thought  proper  to  publish  a  genuine  account  of  the  family,  vouched  by  charters 
and  other  authentic  deeds,  the  originals  whereof  are  either  in  their  own  custody, 
or  to  be  found  amongst  the  public  records  of  the  nation. 

Some  account  is  given  of  the  family  of  Dundas  in  the  First  Volume  of  this 
System,  page  275,  where  Mr  Nisbet,  from  the  similitude  of  the  armorial  bearing, 
and  other  arguments,  attributes  their  original  to  Cospatricius,  Earl  of  Dunbar  and 
March,  .^  ho  came  to  Scotland  with  King  Malcolm  Canmore,  and  was  by  that  wise 
and  discerning  prince  rewarded  with  the  lands  of  Dunbar,  and  many  others  in 
Lothian  and  the  Merse. 

I.  Waldeve,  son  to  Cospatrick,  about  the  year  1124,  grants  to  Helias,  son  of 
Huthred  (fiis  brother)  the  lands  of  Dundas,  to  be  holden  of  him,  as  mentioned  in 
the  copy  of  the  original  charter  in  Sir  James  Dalrymple's  Collections,  page  382, 
and  another  copy  of  the  said  charter,  taken  from  the  original,  is  engraven  in  cop- 
perplate, in  Mr  James  Anderson's  beautiful  Collection  of  Ancient  Scots  Charters, 
lately  published  by  the  learned  Mr  Thomas  Ruddiman. 

II.  Serle  de  Dundas  is  the  next  found  to  succeed  about  the  year  11 70,  and  after 
him  another 

III.  Helias  de  Dundas,  who  is  often  mentioned  in  the  reign  of  King  vUesander 
II.  anno  1220. 

IV.  RuDOLPHUS  de  Dundas  is  afterwards  in  possession  of  Dundas,  and  found 
often  witness  to  the  deeds  of  the  abbot  of  Kelso,  anno  1256  («).  He  was  father 
to 

V.  Saer.  de  Dundas,  who  was  one  of  the  persons  of  rank  mentioned  in  Rag- 
man-Roll, who  swore  fealty  to  Edward  King  of  England,  anno  1296,  and  was 
obliged  to  repeat  the  submission  twice  ;  first  for  his  lands  in  Lothian,  and  again  for 
his  lands  of  Fingask  in  Perthshire  (b'). 

VL  Hugh  de  Dundas  is  often  found  as  companion  to  the  hero  Sir  William  Wal- 
lace, anno  1299.     To  whom  succeeded  another 

VII.  Saer  de  Dundas,  who  was  slain  at  the  battle  of  Duplin,  fighting  against 
Edward  Baliol  and  an  English  army,  anno  1332  (c).     To  him  succeeded 

VIII.  Jacobus  de  Dundas,  of  whom  we  have  discovered  nothing  remarkable. 
He  was  father  to 

IX.  Joannes  de  Dundas,  whom  we  find  disputing  his  right  to  the  islands  in 
the  Forth  opposite  to  the  Queensferry,  with  the  Abbot  of  Dunfermline,  who  pro- 
ceeded against  him  with  the  highest  censures  of  the  church,  before  he  could  oblige 
him  to  desist  from  his  claim:  but  that  matter  being  some  way  accommodated  betwixt 
them,  he  was  absolved  from  the  abbot's  sentence  of  excommunication  in  1342  (rf). 
Afterwards,  upon  his  own  resignation  of  the  lands  of  Fingask,  he  obtained  a  new 
charter  thereof  from  King  David  II.  (<?).  whereof  we  have  thought  proper  to  annex 
a  copy,  as  it  is  the  first  charter  we  can  discover  granted  by  the  sovereign  to  any 
person  of  the  name  of  Dundas,  and  evidences  that  the  barony  of  Fingask  was  the  an- 
cient possession  of  this  family  before  that  period  of  time.     This  John  de  Dundas,  ac 

(j)  Chartulary  of  the  abbacy  of  Kelso,  in  the  Lawyer's  Library.  {V)  Rymer's  Fcedera  Anglise,  and' 
Prynne's  Collections,  (f)  Abercromby's  Martial  Achievements.  ((/)  Absolutio  Abbatis  de  Dunfermline, 
penes  Walterum  M'Farlane  de  eodem.     (c)  Chartain  publicis  atchivis. 


i6H  APPENDIX. 

Ban  de  Fin^nsk,  left  iisue  one  son,  James,  and  a  daughter,  Agile;,,  married  to  Sir 
Adam  Foirester  of  Corstorphine,  Lord  Keeper  of  the  Great  Seal  in  the  reign  of 
King  Robert  II. 

X.  James  succeeded  his  father,  who  appears  to  have  been  very  intent  on  secur- 
ing his  estate  in  those  troublesome  times  wherein  he  lived,  when  the  country  was 
rent  in  pieces  by  factions  of  the  great,  struggling  to  wrest  the  power  out  of  one 
another's  hands,  and  harassing  all  those  who  differed  from  or  opposed  them.  In 
anno  1380  he  obtained  a  new  charter  (/)  from  King  Robert  II.  under  his  Great 
Seal,  of  the  lands  and  barony  of  Fingask,  upon  his  own  resignation  thereof,  to  him- 
self "  et  ha:redibus  de  corpora  suo  legitime  procreatis  seu  procreandis;  quibus  de- 
"  ficientibus,  Adamo  Forrester  de  Corstorphin,  et  hsredibus  suis  quibuscunque." 
This  charter  is  dated  28th  February,  in  the  ninth  year  of  that  king's  reign.  And 
as  he  was  invested  by  the  king  in  the  lands  of  Fingask,  which  held  of  him,  so  he 
obtained  a  new  charter  from  the  Baron  of  Winchburgh,  ancestor  to  the  Earl  of 
Winton,  of  the  lands  of  Dundas,  which  held  ward  of  them,  dated  13th  December 
1397  (^g);  whereby  "  Willielmus  de  Seton  Dominus  ejusdem,  nepos  et  hacres 
"  quondam  Alexandri  Seton  de  eodem,"  grants  and  confirms  "  terras  de  Dundas 
"  Jacobo  de  Dundas,  et  hrcredibus  suis  legitime  procreatis  seu  procreandis  ;  qui- 
"  bus  deficientibus,  Adamo  Forrester  de  Corstorphin,  et  hasredibus  suis  quibus- 
"  cunque."  By  a  charter,  dated  20th  September  1406  (A),  "  Archibaldus  Comes 
"  de  Douglas,  Dominus  Gallovidise  et  Bothwel,"  grants  and  confirms  "  Jacobo  de 
"  Dundas,  Domino  ejusdem,  et  hajredibus  suis,  pro  homagio  et  servitio  suo,  omnes 
"  terras  de  Dunbarny  in  vicecomitatu  de  Perth."  And,  by  another  charter,  dated 
28th  February  1416  (/),  the  same  Earl  of  Douglas  grants  to  the  said  James  Dun- 
das the  lands  of  Easter-Blairmucks,  "  jacen.  in  baronia  de  Bothwell,  in  vicecomi- 
"  tatu  de  Lanerk."  And  in  the  March  following  he  obtained  from  Robert  Duke 
of  Albany,  then  Governor  of  Scotland,  during  King  James  I.  his  absence  in  Eng- 
land, "  licentiam  construendi  castrum  et  fortalicium  apud  Dundas."  And,  for  his 
greater  security  in  these  troublesome  times,  he  resigned  his  lands  of  Dundas,  and 
took  a  new  charter  {k)  from  the  Baron  of  Winchburgh,  superior  thereof,  in  favours 
of  yames  de  Dundas  his  son  and  heir,  reserving  to  himself  his  liferent  of  the  same, 
and  to  Christian  Stewart,  his  spouse,  her  just  third  part  thereof,  and  granting  and 
ordSining  her,  peaceably  at  her  pleasure,  to  abide  in  the  tower  of  Dundas,  after 
the  decease  of  her  said  husband.  This  charter  is  dated  at  Seaton,  30th  November 
1423,  and  registered,  Lib.  2.  Num.  i.  The  said  James  de  Dundas  got  also  a  char- 
ter from  Murdoch  Duke  of  Albany,  Governor  of  Scotland,  to  himself  and  his 
heirs  procreated,  or  to  be  procreated,  with  his  aforesaid  wife  Christian  Stewart, 
dated  in  December  1423  (/).  And  upon  the  return  of  King  James  I.  to  Scotland, 
from  his  confinement  in  Eijgland,  his  Majesty  granted  him  a  confirmation  of  the 
licence  to  build  the  tower  of  Dundas,  dated  i5th  May  1424  (w).  And  in  1425 
that  prince  granted  another  confirmation  of  the  Baron  of  Winchburgh's  charter 
of  the  lands  of  Dundas  above  mentioned,  Jacobo  de  Dundas  scutifero  nostra,  dated 
the  i6th  April,  and  nth  year  of  his  reign  (;;).  And,  to  complete  all  his  rights, 
granted  a  charter,  under  the  Great  Seal,  of  the  lands  of  Fingask,  upon  his  own 
resignation  thereof,  "  Jacobo  Dundas  de  eodem,  tenen.  et  haben.  praedicto  Jacobo 
"  Dundas,  et  hceredibus  suis  masculis  de  corpore  suo  ex  Christiana  Stewart,  sponsa 
"  sua,  legitime  procreatis,  aut  procreandis  ;  quibus  forte  deficientibus,  veris,  le- 
"  gitimis,  et  propinquioribus  haeredibus  dicti  Jacobi  quibuscunque."  This  char- 
ter is  dated  at  Edinburgh  24th  May,  in  the  24th  year  of  that  king's  reign  (0)  ; 
and,  as  it  clearly  illustrates  a  point  in  controversy,  a  full  copy  thereof  is  hereto 
annexed.  The  above  James  de  Dundas  died  in  the  year  1436,  leaving  issue  by 
his  only  wife  Christian  Stewart,  daughter  to  Stewart  Lord  Lorn  and  Innermeth, 
and  Earl  of  Athol,  James,  his  eldest  son  and  heir,  and  Robert,  who  was  forfeited 
with  him,  and  two  daughters,  Elizabeth,  married  to  Philip  Mowbray  of  Barn- 

(/)  Charter  in  the  cViarter-chest  of  Dundas.  (^)  Ibidem.  (h)  Ibidem,  (i)  Charta  In  publicis 
archivis.  Lib.  3.  No.  32.  (k)  Ibid.  Lib.  2.  No.  1.  (/)  Charta  penes  Dundas  de  Fingask.  (m)  Licentia 
in  publicis  archivis,  Lib.  3.  No.  34.  («)  Charta  in  publicis  archivis,  Lib.  2.  No.  2-  (0)  Chatta  ibid. 
Lib.  3.  No.  ^^.  &  extractum  ejusd.  penes  Dundas  de  Fingask. 


APPENDIX.  -idt, 

bougie,  and  Chnstian,  to  Sir  John  Sandilands  of  Calder,  ancestor  to  the  Lord 
Torphichen  ;  and  though  it  be  asserted  in  the  other  memorial  above  taken  notice 
of,  that  this  James  Dundas  had  several  children  by  a  former  wife,  the  contrary  i- 
evident  from  the  charters  above  cited;  in  the  first  of  which,  failing  heirs  of  his 
ou  n  body,  he  sub-titutes  Adcun  Forrester,  his  brother-in-law,  and  his  lien-s,  in  the  fee 
of  his  estate;  and  in  the  last  charter  above  mentioned,  he  provides  the  lands  to 
the  heirs-male  of  his  body,  by  Christian  Stewart  his  spouse  ;  and  failing  of  them,, 
to  his  nearest  and  lawful  heirs  whatsoever  in  the  general ;  which  it  is  not  to  be 
presumed  a  gentleman  who  had  been  so  exact,  and  taken  so  great  pains  in  the 
sectlement  of  his  estate,  and  completing  the  rights  thereof,  would  have  done,  had 
he  had  any  other  children  of  a  former  marriage  to  substitute  in  the  succession  of  hi^ 
estate,  preferably  to  his  heirs  in  general;  nor  is  there  the  least  mention  or  insi- 
nuation of  any  other  wife  or  children  in  any  of  the  charters  above  noticed,  al- 
though there  be  a  considerable  series  of  them,  obtained  at  different  times,  and  at  a 
considerable  distance  of  time  from  one  another. 

XI.  James  succeeded  to  his  father  in  all  his  estate,  in  virtue  of  the  above  char- 
ters ;  and  he  is,  upon  the  6th  November  1437,  served  and  retoured,  '-  tamquam 
"  legitimus  et  propinquior  hxres  quondam  Jacobi  de  Dundas,  de  eodem,  sui 
"  paths,"  in  the  lands  of  Dumbarny  {p).  He  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  to  Sir 
Alexander  Livingston,  thereafter  Lord  Caller^er,  Governor  to  K.ing  James  IL 
by  whom  he  was  brought  into  the  king's  daily  council,  and  is  often  found  witness 
to  his  deeds  and  charters,  from  anno  1437  to  1449  (</),  that  the  great  change  was 
made  at  Court  by  the  prevailing  power  of  the  Earl  of  Douglas  and  his  faction,  and 
the  Lord  Callender,  his  sons,  frisnds,  and  two  sons-in-law,  Sir  James  Dundas  of 
Dundas,  and  Sir  R.obert  Bruce  of  Airth,  were  all  forfeited  by  act  of  Parliament, 
anno  1449  (r),  and  their  estates  given  away  to  the  Earl  of  Douglas  and  his  friends 
and  favourites.  The  estate  of  Fingask,  which  held  of  the  sovereign,  fell  in  his 
hands,  which  he  retained  :  but  the  estate  of  Dundas  fell  partly  to  the  Baron  of 
Winchburgh,  superior  thereof,  and  the  rest  was  given  by  the  king  to  William  Earl 
of  Douglas,  by  two  charters,  both  dated  9th  February  1449,  which  proceed  upon 
the  following  preamble  or  narrative  :  "  Qiis  terrae  cum  pertinen.  ratione  escheta?, 
"  propter  preditoriam  traditionem  in  nostram  personam  regiam,  per  Jacobum  de 
"  Dundas,  als  de  eodem,  commissam,  et  crimen  nostra;  lesa;  majestatis  per  eundem 
"  Jacobum  nequiter  perpetrat.  ad  manus  nostras  devenerunt,  sicuti  in  nostro  par- 
"  liamento  apud  Edinburgh  tento,  anno  subscripto,  notorie  compertum  cxtitit  et 
"  declaratum  (j)." 

The  Earl  of  Douglas's  insolent  treatment  of  the  king  having  procured  his  fall 
by  a  blow  from  his  majesty's  own  hand  in  anno  1451,  Sir  Alexander  Livingston 
and  his  friends  were  pardoned  and  brought  again  into  favour,  and  restored  to  what 
part  of  their  estates  remained  in  the  king's  hands ;  whereby  Sir  Robert  Bruce  was 
restored  to  Airth,  and  Sir  James  Dundas  to  his  estate  of  Fingask,  and  other  lands 
in  Perthshire,  which  held  of  the  king  ;  and  the  new  charter  was  granted  to  him 
and  his  heirs-male,  conform  to  the  old  infeftments  of  the  house  of  Fingask,  which 
in  that  and  all  after  deeds  are  always  referred  to,  on  account  of  the  interniption 
of  their  right  by  the  above  forfeiture. 

The  lands  of  Dundas  being  vested  in  the  person  of  William  Earl  of  Douglas,  at 
the  time  of  his  decease,  fell  to  his  brother  James  Earl  of  Douglas,  and  remained 
with  him  till  they  came  to  the  crown  by  his  forfeiture,  9th  June  1452,  when  pro- 
bably the  king  gave  that  part  of  them  which  fell  to  him,  to  Archibald  Dundas  of 
Liston,  vvho,  from  his  being  possessed  of  the  lands,  assumed  the  designation  of 
Dundas  of  that  Ilk  ever  afterwards ;  and  Sir  James  Dundas  having,  by  the  for- 
feiture, been  dispossessed  of  these  lands,  and  he  and  his  descendants  laying  aside 
that  designation,  and  using  only  that  of  Fingask,  has  given  occasion  to  the  one 

(/)")  Specialis  Retornatus  penes  Dundas  de  Fingask.  (y)  Several  charters  in  the  public  records, 
(r)  Black  Acts  of  Parliament  in  that  year,  and  all  histories  of  that  time,  (s)  Duit  charta;  penes 
Dundas  de  Fingask. 

Vol.  n.  7  E 


-7= 


APPENDIX. 


family  being  mistaken  for  the  other.  But,  to  return  from  this  digression,  Sir 
James  Dundas  above  mentioned,  olim  de  eodem,  now  designed  of  Fingask,  had  issue 
by  his  said  wife,  Elixabeth,  daughter  to  the  Lord  Callender  (/),  two  sons,  Alex- 
ander, his  successor,  and  Duncan  Dundas,  Lyon  King  at  Arms,  who  was  several 
times  sent  ambassador  to  England  (//).  Mr  Nisbet,  in  his  First  Volume  (.\),  and 
other  vouchers,  agree  that  he  was  predecessor  to  the  Dundasses  of  Craigton  and 
Newliston.  He  had  also  a  daughter,  Elizabeth,  married  to  Sir  David  Guthrie 
of  that  Ilk,  who  was  Comptroller,  Treasurer,  &-c.  to  King  James  IIL ;  all  which 
evidences  how  groundlessly  it  is  affirmed  in  the  memorial  above  noticed,  that  this 
Sir  James  Dundas  died  without  children,  and  destroys  the  whole  superstructure 
founded  upon  that  assertion. 

Xn.  Alexander  de  Dundas,  now  that  the  estates  of  Dundas  and  Fingask  were 
separated  as  above,  obtained  himself  served  and  retoured  as  heir  to  his  father  at 
Perth,  anno  1460,  only  in  the  lands  of  Fingask,  &-c.  (y):  and  from  thenceforth 
designed  himself  from  that  estate,  as  we  find  in  a  solemn  contract  of  submission 
betwixt  the  Abbots  of  Scone  and  Cupar  anent  their  marches,  to  be  determined  by 
six  barons,  viz.  "  Dominus  Henricus  Douglas  de  Lochleven,  miles  ;  Joannes  de 
"  Moncrief  de  codem ;  Alexander  de  Dundas  Baro  de  Fingask  ;  Robertus  Aber- 
*'  cromby  de  eodem ;  Patricius  Bruce  de  Pedenys,  et  Gilbertus  Monorgan  de  eodem; 
"  judices  communiter  et  amicabiliter  electi,"  dated  in  anno  1466,  24th  July  {a) ; 
to  which  contract  the  seals  of  the  two  abbots  and  six  judges  are  appended;  that  of 
Alexander  de  Dundas  is  very  entire,  and  distinctly  exhibits  the  old  principal  arms 
of  the  family,  without  any  additional  figure  or  mark  of  cadency,  viz.  a  lion  ram- 
pant in  a  plain  shield,  and  round  the  seal  the  legend  is,  Sigillum  Alexandii  de  Dun- 
das Baro.  de  Fingask.  He  married  Isabel,  daughter  of  Laurence  Lord  Oliphant, 
by  whom  he  had  no  issue;  thereafter  Helen  Arnot,  daughter  and  co-heir  of  Walter 
Arnot  of  Balbarton,  by  whom  he  left  issue  Alexander  his  heir,  Adam  de  Dundas  de 
Oxmure,  and  several  other  sons,  some  of  whom,  with  himself,  were  slain  at  the 
battle  of  Flodden,  9th  September  1513. 

XIII.  Alexander  Dundas  succeeded  his  father,  and,  in  armo  1540,  got  a  new 
charter  from  King  James  V.  of  the  lands  of  Coates  in  the  lordship  of  Elcho,  "  Alex- 
"  andro  Dundas  de  Fingask  et  Elizabeth  Bruce  ejus  conjugi,  et  hsredibus  inter 
"  ipsos  legitime  procreatis  seu  procreandis,  cognomen  et  arma  de  Dundas  geren.  (Z>)." 
By  the  said  EHzabeth  Bruce,  daughter  of  Sir  David  Bruce  of  Clackmanan, 
and  Janet  his  wife,  daughter  to  Sir  Patrick  Blackadder  of  Tulliallan,  he  had 
issue,  first  Archibald  his  heir,  second,  Robert,  third,  Tliomas  of  Findhorn-  (c), 
and  two  daughters,  Nicholas,  married  to  Alexander,  Lord  Commendator  of  Cul- 
ross,  ancestor  to  the  Lord  Colvil,  to  whom  she  had  issue  :  Margaret,  the  second 
daughter,  married  to  William  Ker  of  Ancrum,  their  grandson  was  created  Marquis 
of  Lothian  ;  she  married,  secondly.  Sir  George  Douglas  of  Mordington,  to  whom 
she  had  Sir  George  Douglas,  and  a  daughter,  Martha,  married  to  Sir  James  Lock- 
hart  Lord  Lee ;  their  issue  were  General  William  Lockhart  of  Lee,  Sir  George 
of  Carnwath,  and  Sir  John  of  Castlehill,  and  several  daughters. 

XIV.  Archibald  Dundas  succeeded  his  father ;  he  married  Elizabeth,  daughter 
of  Robert  Colvil  of  Cleish,  ancestor  to  the  Lord  Ochiltree,  by  whom  he  had  issue 
William,  his  eldest  son,  Archibald  and  Robert.  In  anno  1582  he  entered  into  a 
contract  of  marriage  with  his  son  William  and  Dame  Margaret  Carnegie,  eldest 
daughter  to  Sir  David  Carnegie  ;  and  by  her  mother,  Elizabeth  Ramsay,  she  was 
co-heiress  of  Colluthy  and  Leuchars,  whereby  these  lands  and  the  barony  of  Fin- 
gask is  provided  to  the  heirs- male  of  the  aforesaid  marriage,  agreeable  to  the  old 
infeftments,  with  the  lands  of  Coates,  Knightspotty,  &c.  but,  there  being  no 
issue 

XV.  Archibald  Dundas,  his  second  brother,  succeeded,  and  was,  upon  the  8th 
of  February  1606,  served  heir  in  general  to  Alexander  Dundas  of  Fingask,  his 
grandfather,  at  Perth,  before  William,  master  of  Tullibardin,  sheriffof  that  shire  [d). 


(0  Contract  of  marriage  in  the  Earl  of  Linlithgow's  charter-chest.  {«)  Rymer's  Fuedera  Angliae,  ad 
unnum  1484,  &c.  (x)  Page  275.  (  y)  Specialis  retornatus  penes  Dundas  de  Fingask.  (n)  Original 
contract  penes  eundum.  (A)  Charta  in  publicis  archivis  Lib.  22.  No.  292.  {(c)  Charta  ibid.  (//)  Ge- 
neralis  Retornatus  penes  Dundas  de  Fingask. 


APPENDIX.  271 

And,  ill  anno  1609,  he  took  a  new  charter  of  the  lands  of  Fingask  from  the  King  {, ). 
He  married  Jean,  another  daughter  of  the  foresaid  Sir  David  Carnegie,  father  to 
the  Earls  of  Soiithesk  and  Northesk,  by  his  second  wife,  Euphame,  daughter  to  Sir 
John  Wemyss  of  that  Ilk,  ancestor  to  the  Earl  of  V\emyss,  by  whom  he  left  issue  Sir 
John  Dundas,  Robert,  and  six  daughters.  He  married  a  second  time  Giles,  daugh- 
ter to  Sir  Laurence  Mercer  of  Aldie,  by  whom  he  had  Laurence,  predecessor  to 
Mr  Laurence  Dundas,  Professor  of  Humanity  in  the  University  of  Edinburgh;  and, 
dying  in  1624,  was  succeeded  by 

XVL  Sir  John  Dundas  of  Fingask,  his  eldest  son,  who  was  knighted  by  King 
Charles  I.  unno  1633.  His  loyalty  to  his  sovereign,  and  his  near  relation  to  th'j: 
g:;.-at  Marquis  of  Montrose,  induced  him  to  expose  his  life  and  fortune  in  the  royal 
cau-e,  whereby  the  latter  was  much  diminished.  He  married  first,  Anne,  daugh- 
ter to  Sir  William  Moncrief  of  that  Ilk,  without  issue;  and,  secondly,  Margaret, 
daughter  to  George  Dundas  of  Dundas,  by  his  wife  Elizabeth,  daughter  to  Sir  Al- 
exander Hamilton  of  Innerwick,  by  whom  he  left  issue, 

XVIL  John  Dundas,  his  only  son  and  heir,  who  married  Magdalen,  daughter 

to AUardice,  son  to  Allardice  of  that  Ilk,  and  his  wife,  daughter  to 

Sir  Thomas  Burnet  of  Leys,  by  whom  he  left  an  only  son,  Thomas,  and  three 
daughters.  And,  secondly.  He  married  Mary,  daughter  to  Sir  Michael  Arnot  of 
that  Ilk,  without  issue. 

XVIII.  Thomas  Dundas,  presently  of  Fingask,  married  Bethia  BaiUie,  daugh- 
ter to  John  Baillie  of  Casdecary,  and  Margaret,  daughter  to  BaiUie  of  Mannerhall, 
by  whom  he  has  three  sons  living,  viz. 

Thomas,  married  to  Anna,  daughter  to  Mr  James  Graham  of  Airth,  Judge 
of  the  High  Court  of  Admiralty  of  Scotland,  by  Mary  Livingston,  daughter  to 
Alexander  Earl  of  Callender,  and  his  lady,  Anne  Graham,  daughter  to  James  Mar- 
quis of  Montrose. 

Laurence  married  Margaret,  only  daughter  to  Alexander  Bruce  of  Kennet,  by 
Dame  Mary  Balfour,  daughter  to  the  Lord  Burleigh. 

William,  presently  in  the  army. 

The  armorial  bearing  carried  by  Dundas  of  Fingask  is,  argent,  a  lion  rampant 
gules ;  supported  by  two  lions  rampant,  gules  ;  crest,  a  lion's  head  full-faced, 
crowned  with  an  antique  crown,  looking  over  a  bush  of  oak :  motto,  Essayez  ;  and 
the  same  arms,  distinguished  by  a  crescent,  are  used  by  the  above-named  Lau- 
rence Dundas. 

N.  B.  Since  the  above  was  printed,  I  have  seen  the  retour  of"  Archibaldus 
"  Dundas,  filius  et  hseres  quondam  Alexandri  Dundas  de  Fingask,"  in  the  register 
of  Perth,  einno  1547. 


Charta  Confirm.  Davidis  zdi  Regis  Scotortm,  infavorem  Joannis  de  Dundas, 
Baronis  de  Fingask. 


"  DAVID,  Dei  Gratia,  Rex  Scotorum,  Omnibus  probis  hominibus  totius  terne 
SUE,  Clericis  et  Laicis,  salutem.  Sciatis  nos  dedisse,  concessisse,  et  hac  prjcsenti 
charta  nostra  confirmasse  dilecto  et  fideli  nostro  Joanni  de  Dundas,  filio  et  haeredi 
Jacobi  de  Dundas,  totam  et  integram  Baroniam  de  Fingask,  cum  pertinen.  jacen. 
infra  vicecomitatum  de  Perth.  Qusquidem  Baronia  cum  pertinen.  fuerunt 
died  Joannis  hareditarie,  et  quas  idem  Joannes,  non  vi  aut  metu  ductus,  nee 
errore  lapsus,  sed  mera  et  spontanea  voluntate  sua,  in  manus  nostras  per  fustim 
et  baculum  sursum  reddidit,  pureque  simpliciter  resignavlt,  et  totum  jus  et  cla- 
meum  qux  in  praedicta  Baronia  cum  pertinentiis  habuit,  vel  habere  poterit  in  fu- 
turum.  Tenen.  et  haben.  eidem  Joanni  et  haeredibus  suis,  de  nobis  et  ha:redi- 
bus  nostris,  in  feodo  et  ha^reditate,  per  omnes  rectas  metas  et  divisas  suas,  cum 
omnibus  et  singulis  commoditatibus,  assiamentis,  et  justis  pertinentiis  quibus- 
cunque  ad  dictam  Baroniam  spectantibus,  seu  quoquo  modo  in  futurum  juste  spec- 
tare  valentibus,  adeo  hbere,  quiete,  plenarie,  integre,  et  honorifice,  bene  et  in 


{e)  Charta  in  publicis  archivis.  Lib.  46,  No-  398. 


^72  APPENDIX. 

"  pace  in  omnibus,  et  per  omnia,  sicut  prajfatus  Joannes  diet.  Baroniam  ante  dic- 

"  tam  resignationem  nobis  inde  spectan.  liberius  tenuit,  sive  possidet.     R  ddendo 

"  inde  nobis  et  h;credibus  nostiis  idem  Joannes  et  heeredes   sui  unum  Denarium 

"  Argenti  apud  Pentecosten,  nomine  alb;e  firmne,  pro  omni  alio  servitio  secularly 

"  exactione  sen  demanda  quae  per  nos  vel  haeredes  nostros  ad  dictam  Baroniam  in 

"  in  futurum  exigi  poterit  vel  requiri.     In   cujus  rei  testimonium  pnBsenti  cartse 

"  nostrse  nostrum  prascepimus  apponi  Sigillum.    Apud  Edinburgh,  Becimo  Octavo 

"  DieMensis  Februarii  anno  Regni  nostri  tricesimo  quixito  1364." 


Chart  a  Confirm.  Jacobi  imi  Regis  Scotorum,  in  favorem  Jacobi  Dundas  de  eodem, 
Baronis  de  Fingask,  ejusque  conjugis. 


"  Jacobus,  Dei  Gratia,  Rex  Scotorum,  Omnibus  probis  hominibus  totius  terrae 

'•'  sux,  Clericis  et  Laicis,  salutem.     Sciatis  quod  concessimus  dilecto  et  fideli  nostro, 

"  Jacobo  de  Dundas  de  eodem,  totam  Baroniam  de  Fmgask  cum  pertinen.  jacen. 

"  mfra  vicecomitatum  de  Perth.     Quae  quidem  Raronia  fuit  dicti  Jacobi  hteredi- 

"  tarie,  et  quam  idem  Jacobus,  non  vi  aut  metu  ductus,  nee  errore  lapsus,  sed  sua 

"  mera  et  spontanea  voluntate  coram  testibus  in  manus  nostras  per  fustim  et  bacu- 

"  lum  sursum  reddidit,  pureque  simpliciler  resignavit,  ac  totum  jus   et  clameum 

"  qua;  in  dicta  Baronia  cum  pertinen.  habuit,  aut  habere  potuit,  pro  se  et  haeredi- 

"  bus  suis  omnino  quietum  clamavit  in  pepetuum.     Tenendum  et  habendum  dic- 

"  tam  Baroniam  cum  pertinen.  prasdicto  Jacobo  de  Dundas,  et  h^redibus  suis  mas- 

"  culis  de  corpora  suo,  ex  Christiana  Stewart,  sponsa  sua,  legittime  procreatis  aut 

"  procreandis  ;  quibus  forte  deficientibus,  veris  legittimis   et  propinquioribus  h;e- 

"  redibus  dicti  Jacobi   quibuscunque,  de  nobis   et  hjeredibus  nostris   in   feodo  et 

"  hxreditate  in  perpetuum,  per  omnes  rectas  metas  suas  antiquas  et  divisas  in  bos- 

"  tis,  planis,  moris,  maresiis,  viis,  semitis,  aquis,  stagnis,  pratis,  pascuis,  et  pastu- 

"  ris,  molendinis,  multuris,  et  eorum  sequelis,  aucupationibus,  venationibus,  pis- 

"  cationibus,  turbariis,  et  carbonariis,  cum  curiis  et  earum  exitibus   et  eschetis, 

"  cum  fabrilibus  et  brasinis,  ac  cum  omnibus  aliis  et  singulis  libertatibus,  commo- 

"  ditatibus  et  assiamentis,  ac  justis  pertinentiis  quibuscunque,  ad  pradictam  Baro- 

"  am  cum  pertinen.  spectantibus,  seu  juste  spectare  valentibus,  quoraodo  libet  in 

"  futurum,  adeo  libere,  quiete,  plenarie,  integre,  et  honorilice,  bene  et  in  pace,  in 

"  omnibus,  et  per  omnia,  sicut  dictus  Jacobus  aut  aliquis   praedecessorum  suorum 

"  prasdictam  Baroniam  cum  pertinen.  de  nobis  seu  praedecessoribus  nostris  ante  dic- 

"  tam  resignationem  nobis  inde  factam,   liberius  tenuit   seu   possidet.     Reddendo 

"  inde  nobis  et  hseredibus  nostris  dictus  Jacobus  et  haeredes  sui  masculi  de  corpora 

"  suo  et  Christiana  Stewart  sponsa  sua  legittime  procreati  seu  procreandi ;  quibus 

"  forte  deficientibus,  veri  legittimi  et  propinquiores  haredes  dicti  Jacobi   quicun- 

"  que,  annuatim  unum  Denarium   Argenti  ad  festum   purificationis  beatae  Marias 

"  Virginis,  si  petatur,  nomine  albae   firmae  tantum  ;  pro  omnibus   servitiis,  exac- 

"  tionibus  secularibus,  aut  demandis,  quae  de   dicta  Baronia   cum   pertinen.  exigi 

"  poterint  seu  requiri.     In  cujus  rei  testimonium  presenti  cartae  nostrae  Magnum 

"  Sigillum   nostrum   praecepimus   apponi :    Testibus    reverendo  in  Christo    Patre 

"  Joanne,  Episcopo  Glasguen.  Cancellario  nostro,  Magistro  VVillielmo  Pont  pras- 

«  posito  Ecclesice  Collegiatae  de  Bothwell,  nostri  secreti  Sigilli  Custodi,  Thoma  de 

"  Myrton,  Decano  Glasguen.   Joanne  Forrester  Camerario,   Waltero  de   Ogilvy 

"  Thesaurario  Regni  nostri,    Militibus.     Apud  Edinburgh,  XXIV.  Die  Mensis 

«  Maii,  anno  Regni  nostri  XXIV." 


APPENDIX.  C-7J 


Of  URCUJHART  of  Cromarty  and  Meldrujf. 


THE  surname  of  Urquhart  is  of  great  antiquity,  and  the  family  of  Cromarty  was 
always  e-.;ec;iicd  the  liist  and  principal  family  of  that  name  :  taey  enjoyed  not 
only  the  honourable  office  of  hereditary  sheri.f-principal  of  the  shire  of  Cromarty, 
but  the  far  greater  part,  if  not  the  whole,  of  the  said  shirc  did  belong  to  them, 
either  in  property  or  superiority,  and  they  possessed  a  considerable  estate  besides 
in  the  sliire  of  Aberdeen :  But  many  of  the  .old  papers  of  this  tamily  being  lost, 
and  the  rest  of  tnem  in  the  hand^  of  those  who  now  possess  that  estate,  the  particu- 
lar time  and  manner  of  its  rise  cannot  be  tixjd  with  any  certainty  ;  and,  therefore, 
without  taking  notice  of  such  accounts  as  are  only  founded  upon  tradition,  we 
shall  go  no  farther  back  than  we  find  clear  documents  from  charters  and  rctours 
still  extant  in  the  puolic  records. 

There  is  a  charter  of  confirmation  granted  by  King  David  II.  confirming  a  char- 
ter granted  by  Hugh  Earl  of  Ross,  Lord  of  Philorth,  to  Adam  Urquhart,  Sheriff 
of  Cioinarty,  and  iiis  heirs,  of  tHe  lands  of  Fochesterday  in  Buchan,  (now  called 
Fishery)  and  baihaiy  of  Kinnedder.  And  another  charter  of  confirmation  by  the 
said  King  David,  confirming  a  charter  granted  by  David  Lesly,  Lord  of  Philorth, 
to  John  Urquhart,  son  of  Adam  Urquhart,  sheriff  of  Cromarty,  and  his  heirs,  of 
the  said  lands  of  Fochesterday  ;  both  which  charters  are  dated  December  8,  in 
the  40th  year  of  the  said  king's  reign,  which  was  anno  1368  ;  and  by  this  it  seems 
clear,  that  Cromarty  was  a  family  of  note  at  this  time  ;  and  not  only  enjoyed 
the  lands  and  estate  of  that  name,  but  also  the  office  of  sherifl-principal  of  the  said 
shire. 

I.  The  said  Adam  Urquhart  of  Cromarty  married  Brigida,  daughter  of  Fleming 
of  Cumbernauld,  ancestor  of  the  Earl  of  Wigton,  by  whom  he  had  John,  his  suc- 
cessor above  mentioned. 

II.  John  Uh^l-hart  of  Cromarty  married  Agnes,  daughter  of  Sir  Alexander  Ram- 
say of  Dalhousie,  ancestor  of  the  earl  of  that  name,  by  whom  he  had  William. 

III.  Sir  William  Ui^qukart  of  Cromarty  was  knighted  by  King  Robert  HI.  and 
married  Susanna,  daughter  of  Forbes  of  that  Ilk,  ancestor  of  the  Lord  Forbes,  by 
whom  he  had  two  sons,  William  and  Alexander. 

IV.  William  Urquhart  of  Cromarty  married  Elze,  daughter  of  Sir  Alexander 
Forbes,  second  Laird  of  Pitsligo,  ancestor  of  the  Lord  Pitsligo ;  but  having  no 
issue-male  was  succeeded  by  his  brother. 

V.  Alexander  Urqlihart  of  Cromarty  married  Katharine,  daughter  of  Sir 
James  Ogilvie  of  Deskford,  aiicestor  of  the  Earl  of  Findlater,  by  whom  he  had 
Thomas,  and  several  other  children  ;  and  of  one  of  his  younger  sons  was  d';scended 
Colonel  John  Urquhart,  who  served  many  years  in  Sweden  with  great  applause. 

VI.  Thomas  Urquhart  of  Cromarty  married  Helen  Abernethy,  daugliter  of  the 
Lord  Salton,  by  whom,  it  is  said,  he  had  twenty-five  sons  and  eleven  daughters  ; 
seven  of  the  sons  were  killed  at  the  battle  of  Pinky,  which  was  fought  on  the  loth 
of  September  1547,  in  C)iieen  Mary's  minority;  and  of  another  of  his  sons  is  de- 
scended the  family  of  Newhall,  now  represented  by  Captain  David  Urquhart,  only 
son  and  heir  of  Colonel  Alexander  Urquhart  of  Newhall,  deceased.  It  is  uncertain 
at  what  precise  time  the  family  of  Burdsyards  cam;  olf  the  family  of  Cromarty  ; 
but  it  is  highly  probable  it  was  long  before  this  time ;  for  although  the  first  charter 
we  see  in  the  public  records,  in  favour  of  Alexander  Urquhart  of  Burdsyards,  is 
in  jthe  reign  of  King  James  V.  yet  it  is  certain  that  family  have  much  older 
papers  in  their  charter-chest.  On  the  death  of  this  Thomas  he  was  succeeded  by 
his  eldest  son 

VII.  Alexander  Urquhart  of  Cromarty,  who  was  served  and  retoured  heir  to 
his  father  the  21st  March  1561,  in  the  lands  of  Fishery  and  others  ,  and  married 
Beatrix,  daughter  of  Innes  of  Auchintoull,  an  old  family  in  BaniTsliire,  by  whom 
he  'lad  .Valter,  and  Johy  Q  quhart  of  Craigfintray,  coinmonly  called  Tutor  of  Cro- 
marty, with  several  other  children. 

Vol.  II.  7  G 


^74 


APPENDIX. 


VIII.  Walter  Urquhart  of  Cromarty  was  served  heir  to  his  father  the  nth  of 
April  1564,  and  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  Kemieth  Mackenzie  of  Kintail, 
ancestor  of  the  Earl  of  Seaforth,  by  whom  he  had  Henry. 

IX.  Henry  Urquhart,  younger  of  Cromarty,  died  before  his  father,  leaving  by 
Elizabeth,  his  wife,  daughter  of  Ogilvie  of  Banff,  ancestor  of  the  Lord  Banff,  one 
son  named  Thomas. 

X.  Sir  Thomas  Urquhart  of  Cromarty  was  served  heir  to  his  father  on  the  13th 
of  April  1603,  and  to  his  grandfather  on  the  nth  of  May  1607  ;  he,  was  knighted 
by  Kmg  James  VI.  anno  1617,  and  married  Christian,  daughter  of  Alexander  Lord 
Elphinstone,  by  whom  he  had  Sir  Thomas,  and  Sir  Alexander  Urquhart  of  Dun- 
lugus,  with  several  daughters,  one  of  which  married  Campbell  of  Calder,  and  ano- 
ther Abercromby  of  Bnkenbog, 

Sir  Thomas  Urquhart  of  Cromarty  was  knighted,  in  Whitehall  gallery,  by  his 
Majesty  Kmg  Charles  1.  on  the  7th  of  April  1641,  and  was  afterwards  a  great 
suflerer  for  his  loyalty  to  that  distressed  prince,  and  his  son  King  Charles  II.  be- 
ing taken  prisoner  at  the  battle  of  Worcester,  and  his  estate  sequestrated  by  the 
rebels.  He  lived  to  see  the  happy  Restoration,  and  died  soon  after,  having  never 
married  ;  and  his  brother,  Sir  Alexander  Urquhart  of  Dunlugus,  having  married  his 
own  cousin,  a  daughter  of  the  Lord  Elphinstone,  had  several  daughters,  but  no 
male  issue;  so  this  branch  failing,  and  the  male  descendants  of  Walter  being  now 
extinct,  we  must  return  to  his  brother. 

John  Urquhart  of  Craigfintray  was  born  anno  1547;  and,  after  the  death  of  his 
brother  and  nephew,  was  tutor  to  his  grand-nephew  Sir  Thomas,  by  which  desig- 
nation of  Tutor  of  Cromarty  he  was  commonly  known;  he  managed  his  nephew's 
affairs  to  great  advantage,  and  also  acquired  a  very  handsome  estate  himself.  He 
lived  to  a  great  age,  and  died  at  his  own  house  of  Craigston,  which  he  had  built 
many  years  before,  upon  the  day  of  1631,   having  been  three  times 

married ;  first,  to  a  daughter  of  Gordon  of  Cairnborrow,  relict  of  Meldrum  of  Men, 
by  whom  he  had  John,  his  eldest  son,  with  several  other  children;  one  of  his 
daughters  being  married  to  Gordon  of  Buckie,  and  another  to  Sir  Alexander  Gor- 
don of  Clunie.  Secondly,  he  married  Jean  Abernethy,  daughter  of  the  Lord  Sal- 
ton,  relict  of  Alexander  Seaton  of  Meldrum,  by  whom  he  had  no  issue.  And, 
thirdly,  he  married,  anno  1610,  Elizabeth  Seaton,  only  daughter  and  heir  of  Alex- 
ander Seaton,  younger  of  Meldrum,  and  grandchild  of  Alexander  Seaton,  whose 
relict  he  had  formerly  married,  by  whom  he  had  Patrick  Urquhart  of  Meldrum, 
Adam  Urquhart  of  Auchintoull,  Walter  Urquhart  of  Crombie,  James  Urquhart  of 
Oldcraig,  and  one  daughter,  married  to  Eraser  of  Easter-Tyrie.  John  Urquhart  of 
Lathers,  eldest  son  to  the  said  John  Urquhart  of  Craigfintray,  married  a  daughter 
of  Innes  of  that  Ilk,  an  ancient  family  in  Murray,  and  died  soon  after  his  father, 
on  the  day  of  in  the  same  year,  1631,  leaving  one  son  named  John. 

John  Urql^hart  of  Lathers  married  his  own  cousin-german,  a  daughter  of  the 
-;aid  family  of  Innes ;  and  dying  on  the  day  of  1634,  left  a  son,  named 

John,  then  an  infant,  who,  upon  the  death  of  Sir  Thomas  Urquhart  of  Cromarty, 
and  his  brother,  without  male  issue,  came  to  represent  the  said  family,  and  was- 
knighted  by  King  Charles  II. ;  and  his  mother  having  married  the  Lord  Brodie, 
one  of  the  Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice,  had  by  him  James  Brodie  of  that  Ilk, 
grandfather  to  the  present  Lord  Lyon. 

Sir  John  Urquhart  of  Cromarty  married daughter  of  George,  second 

Earl  of  Seaforth,  by  whom  he  had  two  sons,  Jonathan  and  Captain  Kenneth,  which 
last  died,  leaving  no  issue-m.ale. 

Jonathan  Urquhart  of  Cromarty  married  Jean,  daughter  of  James,  second  Marquis 
of  Montrose,  by  whom  he  had  one  son  named  James  ;  and  the  affairs  of  the  family 
now  falling  in  disorder,  the  estate  cam.e  to  be  sold,  and  was  purchased  by  Macken- 
zie Viscount  of  Tarbet,  who  thereafter  was  created  Earl  of  Cromarty. 

Colonel  James  Urquhart,  representative  of  Cromarty,  served  both  in  Spain  and 
Flanders  with  great  applause;  he  married  Anne,  daughter  of  Rollo  of  Powhouse, 
in  Stirlingshire,  and  died  on  the  3d  of  January  1741,  leaving  only  one  daughter 
named  Grissel;  so  all  the  male  descendants  of  the  Tutor  of  Cromarty,  by  his  first 
marriage,  being  failed,  we  must  now  return  to  the  eldest  son  of  his  last  marriage. 


APPENDIX.  275 

Patrick  Urquhart  of  Meldium  was  born  anno  1611 ;  he  had  not  only  his  house 
of  Lethendy  plundered,  (where  he  hved  before  lie  succeeded  in  right  of  his  mo- 
ther to  the  estate  of  Meldrum)  but  also  suffered  several  otlier  hardships  for  his 
loyalty  to  his  Majesty  King  Charles  I.  He  married  Margaret,  daughter  of  James 
first  Earl  of  Airly,  who  had  the  honour  to  save  her  brother  the  Lord  Ogilvie's  life, 
who  made  his  escape  in  her  clothes  from  the  prison  at  St  Andrews,  anno  1646,  the 
very  night  before  he  was  to  have  been  executed,  with  Sir  Robert  Spottiswood,  Lord 
President  of  the  Session,  and  others  who  suffered  at  that  time  for  their  loyalty. 
And  by  this  lady  he  had  issue  John,  who  died  unmarried,  Adam,  his  successor, 
James  Urquhart  of  Knockleith,  (who  married  Margaret,  daughter  of  Eraser  of 
Tyrie,  and  had  one  son.  Captain  John  Urquhart  of  Craigston,  of  whom  afterwards, 
and  two  daughters)  Dr  Patrick  Urquhart,  professor  of  medicine  in  the  King's  Col- 
lege of  Aberdeen,  (who  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  of  Dr  Andrew  Muir,  his  pre- 
decessor in  office,  by  whom  he  had  Dr  James,  Dr  Alexander,  and  William,  with 
several  daughters)  Captain  Alexander  Urquhart,  who  was  killed  in  the  king's  ser- 
vice, anno  1685,  r.nd  one  daughter,  Elizabeth,  married  first  to  Sir  George  Gordon 
of  Gight,  (which  family  she  heired  by  a  daughter)  and  afterwards  to  Major-Ge- 
neral  Thomas  Buchan. 

Adam  UK.k>ynAiiT  of  Meldrum  was  born  anno  1635,  and  in  his  younger  years, 
when  his  elder  brother  was  alive,  served  lopg  abroad  iis  a  soldier;  and,  after  his  re- 
turn to  his  own  country,  he  had  the  honuur  to  serve  his  Majesty  King  Charles  IL 
as  cornet,  and  then  as  lieutenant  of  that  independent  troop  of  horse  commanded 
by  his  uncle  the  Earl  of  Airly,  and  was  thereafter  made  capt.iin  of  the  said  troop 
in  room  of  the  said  Earl;  in  which  station  he  continued  till  his  death,  which  hap- 
pened at  Edinburgh  the  icth  day  of  November  1684.  He  married,  anno  161^7, 
Mary,  daughter  of  Lewis  Marquis  of  Huntly,  and  sister  of  George,  first  Duke  of 
Gordon,  by  whom  lie  had  John,  his  successor,  James  Urquhart  of  Blyth,  (who 
married  Jean,  daughter  of  Porterfield  of  Comiston,  by  whom  he  had  two  sons, 
James  Urquhart,  now  of  Blyih,  and  Adam,  and  three  daughters)  Adam  and  Lewis, 
both  churchmen  in  France;  also  three  daughters,  Mary,  a  nun  at  Dieppe  in  France, 
Elizabeth,  married  to  David  Ogilvie  of  Clova,  and  Anne,  married  in  France  to  Sir 
Florence  O'Donogh,  an  Irish  gentleman,  and  an  officer  in  the  King  of  France's 
Gens  d'Arms.  The  said  Ladv  Mary  Gordon,  after  Meldrum's  death,  married  James- 
Earl  of  Perth,  then  Lord  High  Chancellor  of  Scotland,  and,  after  the  Revolution, 
went  to  France  with  her  husband,  where  she  lived  till  March  1726,  and  died  at  St 
Germains  in  the  Soth  year  of  her  age. 

John  URQLiH-\K.r  of  Meldrum  married  Jean,  daughter  of  Sir  Hugh  Campbell  of 
Calder,  by  whom  he  had  Adam,  who  died  unmarried,  and  William,  his  successor; 
also  tour  daughters,  Mary,  married  to  William  Menzies  of  Pitfoddels,  Jean,  to 
Alexandei  Stewart  of  Auchluncart,  Elizabeth,  to  William  Forbes  of  Tilliorey,  and 
Anne,  to  Charles  Gordon  of  Blelack:  He  died  at  Aberdeen  the  17th  of  November 
1726,  in  the  59th  year  of  his  age. 

William  Urqi'hart  of  Meldrum  married  Mary,  daughter  of  Sir  William  Forbes 
of  Monymusk,  by  whom  he  has  now  Uving  two  sons,  William  and  Keith,  and 
three  daughters ;  Jean,  the  eldest,  married  to  Captain  John  Urquhart  of  Craig- 
ston, only  son  of  James  Urquhart  of  Knockleith,  before-mentioaed,  and  has  seve- 
ral children,  and  the  other  two  daughters,  Mary  and  Elizabeth,  are  both  young  and 
unmarried. 

And  now,  by  the  death  of  Colonel  James  UrquJiart,  representative  of  Cromarty^ 
without  male  issue,  the  said  Wilham  Urquhart  of  Meldrum  falls  to  represent  the 
said  family. 

The  arms  of  this  family,  as  now  matriculated  in  the  Lyon  Register,  are  or,  three 
bears'  heads  erased  gules,  langued  azure,  supported  by  two  greyhounds,  proper, 
coloured  gules,  and  leished  or;  above  the  shield  a  helmet  befitting  his  degree, 
with  a  mantle  gules,  doubling  argent;  and  on  a  wreath  of  his  colours  is  set,  for 
his  crest,  a  demi-otter  issuing  sable,  crowned  with  an  antique  crown  or,  holding 
betwixt  his  paws  a  crescent  gules  (being  the  armorial  figure^  of  Meldrum  of  that 
Ilk,  and  Seatoa  of  Meldrum) ;  and,  in  an  escrol  above,  this  motto,  Per  mare  cs" 


-76  APPENDIX. 

terrar,  and,  in  another  below,  these  words,  Mean,  speak,  and  do  iveH,  being 
ancient  motto  of  Cromarty. 


SOMERVILLE  of  Camneth.vn,  or  Cambusnethan,  in  the  County  of 
Lanark. 


Mr  NISBET,  the  author,  in  his  First  Volume,  page  256,  observes,  that  one 
eminent  fa:nily  of  the  name  of  Somerville,  was  the  Somervilles  Barons  of  Camne- 
than,  or  Cambusnet'iiaii:  The  tirst  of  which  (says  he)  was  Su-  John  Somerville, 
son  of  John  Lord  Somerville,  by  his  second  wife  Mary  Baillie,  a  daughter  of  La- 
mington ;  but  that  he  had  not  seen  the  arras  of  that  family  in  old  books,  and  says 
little  more  about  it;  however,  the  following  account  of  the  family  of  Camnethan, 
with  evident  documents  of  the  truth  of  it,  came  to  our  hands  since  the  death  of  the 
author. 

Sir  John  was  born  anno  1463,  and  was  first  designed  of  Quothquhan ;  but  after 
his  father  provided  him  in  the  large  barony  of  Camnethan,  and  a  considerable  part 
of  the  estate  of  Carnwath,  in  the  county  of  Lanark,  beside  the  ten-merk  land  of 
the  manor  of  Roberton,  with  the  lands  of  Kingledore,  in  the  county  of  Peebles, 
he  was  designed  of  Camnethan,  or  Cambusnethan.  He  married  Elizabeth  Car- 
michael,  daughter  of  William  Carmichael  of  Balmeady,  b^  his  wife  Elizabeth  Sib- 
bsl'id.  Countess  Dowager  of  Angus,  mother  of  Archibald  Earl  of  Angus,  commonly 
called  Bell  the  Cat:  She  bore  to  him  Sir  John,  his  heir,  William,  who  got  for  his 
portion  the  lands  of  Tarbrax,  and  three  daughters;  Margaret,  married  to  the  Mas- 
ter of  Montrose,  eldest  son  of  William  the  first  Earl  of  that  title,  Elizabeth,  to 
Robert  Dalziel  of  that  Ilk,  ancestor  to  the  Earl  of  Carnwath,  and  Helen,  to  Robert 
Boyd  of  Kilmarnock,  who  was  created  Lord  Boyd,  ancestor  to  the  Earl  of  K.il- 
mai-nock,  each  of  whom  had  issue:  And  besides  these,  Sir  John  had  two  law- 
ful sons,  Michael  and  James,  who  are  witnesses  to  a  charter  granted  by  the 
Lord  Somerville  to  Chancellor  of  Shieldhill,  his  vassal,  dated  12th  September  1508; 
but  whether  these  had  issue,  or  were  married,  does  not  appear.  As  Sir  John  was 
a  great  favourite  of  King  James  IV.  so  with  him  he  lost  his  life  at  the  fatal  battle 
of  Flodden,  anno  1513,  as  appears  by  the  retour  of  his  son  and  successor, 

John,  the  second  Laird  of  Camnethan,  who  was  served  heir  to  his  father,  and 
infeft  in  his  estate,  anno  1515.  This  gentleman  was  much  attached  to  the  Dou- 
glassian  faction,  (being  first  and  second  cousin  to  the  then  Earl  of  Angus,  grand- 
son of  Be/l  the  Cat)  in  the  minority  of  King  James  V.  and,  as  he  appears  to  have 
been  a  man  of  great  courage  as  well  as  power,  so  he  was  a  great  support  to  that 
interest,  even  when  it  was  upon  the  decline;  -for  vi'hen  John  Duke  of  Albany,  Re- 
gent of  the  kingdom,  had  gone  into  France,  and  had  committed  the  administration 
of  public  affairs  to  seven  deputy  governors,  viz.  Anthony  Darcy,  a  Frenchman,  the 
Earls  of  Angus,  Arran,  Argyls,  and  Huntly,  Andrew  Forman,  Archbishop  of  St 
Andrews,  and  James  Beaton,  Archbishop  of  Glasgow,  Chancellor  of  the  kingdom; 
and  that  Darcy  was  put  to  death  by  the  Humes,  Arran,  by  the  assistance  of 
Beaton,  endeavoured  to  grasp  at  the  management  of  all  public  affairs,  and  got 
himself  actually  chosen  chief  of  the  deputy  governors,  and  began  to  oppress 
Angus  and  the  Douglassian  faction  ;  then  Sir  John  Somerville,  of  whom  we 
are  now  speaking,  appeared  for  Angus,  and  gave  Arran  and  his  faction  abun- 
dance of  disturbance  ;  particularly,  Buchanan  tells  us,  that  when  a  contro- 
versy happened  between  Andrew  Ker  of  Ferniherst  and  the  Earl  of  Ana,u},  the 
Hamiltons  took  part  with  Andrew,  more  out'  of  hatred  to  the  Douglas  than  the 
justice  of  Andrew's  cause,  and  that  both  parties  were  preparing  to  decide  the  con- 
troversy by  the  chance  of  a  battle,  this  Sir  John  Somerville  attacked  the  Hamil- 
tonian  party,  under  the  command  of  James,  Arran's  natural  son,  slew  five  of  the 
faction,  took  above  thirty  of  their  horses,  and  put  the  rest  to  flight.  Buchanan's 
words  are,  "  Igitur  cum  sub  diem  conventus,  in  majores.  quam  pro  re  de  qua  con- 
"  tendebatur,  aleam  certarainis  sese  utrique  pararent,  Joannes  SomervaUius,  Dou- 


APPENDIX.  277 

"  glassianaj  factionis,  juvenis  nobilis  &•  magni  animi,  Jucobum  Arrianrc  coinitis 
"  riliiim  nochani,  in  itinere  aggiessus,  quinqu^  coinituin  ejus  occidit,  reliquos  fii- 
"  gavit,  supra  trigint.i  equos  cep;t,"  page  420.  Kdinb.  edii.  1727.  1.  14.  ch.  ir- 
And  Hume  of  Godscioft  gives  much  the  same  account  of  this  action  in  his  History 
oi  the  Douglasses. 

Besides,  m  the  affairs  of  which  Buchanan  gives  us  the  history  in  tlie  following 
chapter,  this  Sir  John  SomerviUe  was  the  chief  and  prmcipal  actor;  to  wit,  when 
a  convention  was  indicted  at  Edinburgh,  2gth  of  April  1520,  and  a  great  number 
of  western  Peers  of  the  Hamiiionian  faction  came  to  tnat  place,  and  in  their 
private  councils  had  determined  to  appreiiend  the  person  of  the  Earl  of  Angus  ; 
and,  if.  order  to  accomplish  that  end,  had  shut  up  the  whole  ports  of  the  city:  Tliis 
Sir  John  was  the  chief  of  these  eighty  brave  men  who  drove  Arran  and  Beaton  out 
of  the  city,  killed  seventy-two  of  their  party,  and  obliged  that  Earl  and  his  bastard 
son,  with  several  others,  to  save  their  lives  by  making  their  escape  through  the 
North-Loch,  through  which  Sir  John  himself  pursued  them,  although  it  appears 
that  the  Hainiitonian  faction  was  very  numerous  ;  for  after  Angus  found  himself 
master  of  the  city,  he  emitted  a  proclamation,  forbidding  any  person  to  appear 
armed  in  the  streets,  except  those  of  his  own  party,  but  liberty  to  all  such  as  should 
desire  it  to  depart  w  ithoiit  harm  from  the  tov.'n;  no  less  than  eight  hurKlred  of  those 
who  had  been  beat  from  the  streets,  marched  out  in  one  body.  Buchanan's  words 
are,  "  Abierunt  autem  iino  agmine,  piteter  eos  qui  fugam  prcEceperant,"  (/.  f .  over 
the  Nortli-Loch)  "  equites  plus  minus  octingenti,  majore  cum  ignominia  quani 
"  damno."  And  that  Sir  John  Somerville  was  the  chief  commander  in  this  ac- 
tion, is  vouched  not  only  from  the  history  of  the  family  of  Camnethan,  penes  Lord 
Somerville,  but  likewse  from  the  records  of  parliament ;  for,  as  such,  he  alone  of 
all  the  eighty,  was  forfeited  by  the  Parliament  holden  at  Edinburgh,  April  7.  1522, 
(notwithstanding  of  a  remission  he  had  formerly  gotten)  and  his  estate  given  to 
the  Earl  of  Arran,  Hugh  Lord  Somerville,  and  Sir  James  Hamilton  of  Fynart, 
Arran's  already-mentioned  bastard  son ;  but  he  was  restored  again  to  his  estate  and 
honour  by  the  Parliament  holden  at  Edinburgh  August  3.  1525,  whilst  Arran, 
Somerville,  and  Sir  James  opposed  it  with  all  their  interest  ;  which  restoration- 
was  confirmed  by  the  king  himself  at  the  age  of  fourteen  years,  2ist  June 
1526.  The  truth  of  which  is  vouched  from  the  records  of  Parliament  of  the 
above  dates. 

Sir  John  married  Margaret  Graham,  daughter  of  William  Earl  of  Montrose  r 
Their  contract  of  marriage,  and  likewise  that  of  the  Master  of  Montrose  with  Mar- 
garet Somerville,  Sir  John's  sister,  already  mentioned,  are  both  dated  at  Glasgow, 
loth  July  1510.  By  her  he  had  two  sons.  Sir  John,  the  heir  of  his  family,  and  Wil- 
liam, who  got  for  his  patrimony  a  forty-shilling  land  in  the  Netherton  of  Camne- 
than ;  and  likewise  two  daughters,  Nicolas,  the  eldest,  first  married  to  John  Lord 
Fleming,  ancestor  to  the  Earl  of  Wigton,  and  had  issue,  and  next  to  George  Earl 
of  Rothes,  whose  first  lawful  wife  she  was,  and  to  uhom  she  bore  Andrew,  heir  of 
the  earldom,  another  son  who  was  the  father  of  the  first  Lord  Lindores,  and  a 
daughter,  Agnes,  married  to  William  Douglas  of  Lochleven,  afterwards  Earl  of 
Morton,  to  whom  she  bore  (besides  male)  seven  daughters,  called  the  Perches  of 
Lochleven,  married  into  the  families  of  Argyle,  Home,  Errol,  Oliphant,  Wemyss, 
Firullater,  and  Glammis,  now  Strathmore ;  Sir  John's  other  daughter,  Margaret, 
was  married  to  Johnstone  of  Westerhall.  Jtle  died,  anno  1543,  and  was  succeeded 
by  his  son 

John,  the  third  of  the  family  of  Camnethan  ;  this  gentleman  was  much  in  fa- 
vour with  King  James  V.  He  married,  first,  Katharine,  daughter  of  William  Car- 
michael  of  Meadowflat,  who  (because  he  was  Captain  of  the  castle  of  Crawford) 
is  most  frequently  designed  in  history  Captain  of  Crawford  ;  by  her  he  had  two 
sons  and  two  daughters,  James,  his  successor,  and  Robert,  who  had  for  his  portion 
the  lands  of  Overcaldlaw  ;  Katharine,  the  eldest  daughter,  married  to  Cockburn  of 
Skirling,  near  Biggar,  then  a  very  considerable  family  ;  and  Agnes,  the  younger 
daughter,  married  to  Gavin  Hamilton  of  Netherhillies,  without  the  consent  of  her 
parents,  and,  for  that  reason,  disowned  by  them.  Katharine  Carmichael  died  anno 
ri;^o,  and  Camnethan  took  for  his  second  wife,  Katharine,  daughter  of  John  Mur- 
'VoL.  IL  T  ri 


ayb 


APPENDIX. 


ray  of  Falahall,  Sheriff  of  the  Forest,  ancestor  to  Murray  of  Fhiliphaugh,  by 
Margaret  his  wife,  daughter  of  Patrick  Hepburn,  first  Earl  of  Bothwell,  by  whom 
he  had  a  numerous  issue,  namely, 

John  Somerville,  who  was  first  provided  in  the  fee  of  the  lands  of  Drum,  half 
of  Gilmerton  and  Gutters,  then  in  possession  of  the  family  of  Camnethan  ;  but 
after  they  returned  to  my  Lord  Somerville's  family,  John  was,  in  lieu  of  them, 
provided  in  the  lands  of  Potterhall,  and  several  others  within  the  barony  of  Cam- 
nethan; Patrick,  the  second,  got  the  lands  of  Green;  William,  the  third  son,  went 
abroad,  and  took  orders  in  the  church  of  Rome;  and  Thomas,  the  fourth,  of  whom 
IS  descended  Mr  William  Somerville,  minister  of  Hawick.  Besides  these  sons  he 
had  four  daughters  by  Katharine  Murray,  to  wit,  Helen,  married  to  Sir  John  Skene 
of  Curriehill,  who  was  Lord  Register  in  the  reign  of  King  James  VI.  and  ambas- 
■^ador  for  that  prince  to  several  foreign  courts,  and  had  a  numerous  issue;  Nicolas, 
married  to  Walter  Stewart  first  Lord  Blantyre;  Jean,  married  to  James  Dunlop  of 
that  Ilk  ;  and  Margaret,  married  to  Adam  Whiteford  of  that  Ilk,  or  of  Milton; 
and  they  all  had  issue. 

This  John  Somerville  is  the  person  who,  with  many  of  the  peers  and  principal 
gentry,  signed  the  bond  of  association  in  favour  of  the  prince,  when  Queen  Mary, 
his  mother,  gave  in  a  demission  of  the  crown  and  government,  as  is  mentioned  by 
Mr  James  Anderson  in  his  Collections  relating  to  the  History  of  Queen  Mary:  He 
is  likewise  the  same  from  whom  the  Earl  of  Arran  borrowed  a  sum  of  money,  by 
a  mortgage  upon  his  lands,  immediately  after  the  death  of  the  Regent  James  Earl 
of  Murray,  (as  Buchanan  tells  us,  lib.  20.  c.  6.  page  601,  Edinburgh  Edit.)  his 
words  are,  "  Caede  Proregis  vix  dum  divulgata.  Jacobus  Hamiltonius,  oppositis 
"  pignore  agris  Joanni  Somervillio  Camnethanio,  pecuniam  accepit,  &-C."  To  him 
succeeded 

Sir  James,  his  son  and  heir,  the  fourth  of  the  family  of  Camnethan,  who  married, 
nnno  1561,  Margaret,  eldest  daughter,  and  one  of  the  two  heirs-portioners  of 
Archibald  Hamilton  of  Raploch,  and  by  her  had  Sir  John,  his  heir,  and  two  daugh- 
ters ;  Margaret,  first  married  to  Gilbert  Lord  Somerville,  and  had  issue,  who  are 
all  extinct;  and  next  to  Sir  James  Muirhead  of  Lauchop,  and  had  issue;  and  Mary, 
married  to  Cleland  of  that  Ilk,  and  had  issue.  To  Sir  James  succeeded  his  only 
son 

JoTtN,  the  fifth  Laird  of  Camnethan;  he  married,  anno  1597,  Mary  Hamilton, 
daughter  of  Sir  James  Hamilton  of  Evandale,  and  by  her  had  three  sons,  John, 
James,  and  Patrick,  and  a  daughter,  Mary,  who  made  a  clandestine  marriage  with 
Mathew  Stewart  of  Muirhouse,  brother  to  the  Laird  of  Minto. 

Sir  John,  the  eldest  son,  married Hamilton,  daughter  of  Sir  Robert 

Hamilton  of  Silvertonhill,  and  by  her  he  had  only  one  daughter,  married  toSir  James 
Kincaid  of  that  Ilk.  This  gentleman.  Sir  John  Somerville,  was  designed  of 
Kersewell;  for,  dying  before  his  father,  he  never  came  to  be  Laird  of  Camnethan. 
But 

Sir  James,  second  son  to  Sir  John  the  fifth  Laird,  succeeded  to  his  father  and 
elder  brother,  and  was  served  and  retoured  heir  to  them,  anno  1620,  and  anno  1623 
married  Helen  Hamilton,  daughter  of  Sir  John  Hamilton  of  Bargeny,  and  sister  to 
the  first  Lord  of  that  title,  by  whom  he  had  two  sons.  Sir  John  and  James.  This 
gentleman  had  entertained  the  Marquis  of  Montrose,  his  kinsman,  for  three  or  four 
nights  at  his  house  at  Camnethan,  as  he  went  through  Clydesdale  to  Fhiliphaugh, 
his  little  army  being  quartered  in  the  country  thereabout,  for  which  he  was  fined 
in  L.io,ooo  Scots  by  the  Council  of  State.  He  was  a  most  profuse  and  extravagant 
man;  for,  in  his  own  Hfetime,  he  sold  off  his  whole  estate  (which  was  the  most  con- 
siderable belonging  to  any  gentleman  in  the  shire  of  Lanark)  in  fifteen  or  sixteen 
different  parcels,  some  to  be  holden  of  the  crown,  and  others  of  himself,  and  thus 
brought  his  family  to  ruin  ;  Sir  John,  his  eldest  son,  having  no  posterity, 

James,  the  younger,  became  the  representative  of  the  family,  who  married  Isa- 
bella Drummond,  only  child  of  Alexander  Drummond  of  Kettleston  (a  cadet  of 
Drummond  of  Carnock)  by  Helen  Fairly,  daughter  of  Sir  Robert  Fairly  of  Braid; 
by  whom  he  had  two  sons,  William  Somerville  of  Corhouse,  and  Hugh  Somerville 
of  Inverteil,  Writer  to  the  Signet. 

3 


APPENDIX.  C79 

William,  the  eldest,  married  Violet  Baillie,  daughter  and  heires'5  of  John  Bail- 
lie  of  St  John's  Kirk,  by  Martha  Lindsay,  eldest  daugliterof  Su-  William  Lindsay  of 
Covington,  by  whom  he  had  James  Sotnerville  of  Corhouse,  and  George,  both  un- 
married, and  s.-veial  daughters,  of  whom  Isabella  is  married  to  Wilham  Inglis  of 
Eastshiel,  DoLtor  r'.'  Medicine. 

Hugh,  the  s  cond  son,  married  Agnes  Gibson,  daughter  of  Sir  Alexander  Gib- 
son of  Pentlund.  one  of  the  Principal  Clerks  of  Session,  by  whom  he  has  two 
daughters,  Helen,  married  to  Mr  James  Geddes.  yoimger  of  Rachan,  Advocate, 
and  Isabella,  married  to  Mr  Hugh  Dalrymple,  Advocate,  second  son  of  Sir  David 
Dalrymple  of  Hailes,  Rart  Advocate  to  Queen  Aone  and  King  George  I.  who  is 
now  designed  Mr  Hugh  Murmy  Kynninmond  of  Melgum  and  Kynninmond. 
and  has  issue. 


SCOTT   OF    HORSLIHILL. 


CAPTAIN  ROBERT  SCOTT  of  Horslihill,  or,  on  a  bend  azure,  a  star  be- 
twixt  two  crescents  of  the  first ;  and,  for  ditference,  a  sword  in  pale,  proper,  in 
the  dexter  chief ;  crest,  a  lion's  head  erased,  proper :  motto,  Pro  patria. 

The  fiist  of  this  family  was  Adam  Scott  of  Tushilaw,  descerided  of  Scott  of 
Houpayslay.  a  brother  of  Buccleugh.  Adam  was  succeeded  by  bis  son,  Robert 
Scott  of  Tushilaw;  his  son  was  Walter  Scott  of  Midhope;  his  second  son,  Robert 
Scott,  portioner  in  Hawick,  who  was  father  to  William  Scott  of  Horslihill.  He 
was  succeeded  by  his  son  Robert ;  and  he,  by  his  son  Francis,  who  was  father  to 
the  present  Captain  Robert  Scott  of  Horslihill. 


SCOTT  OF  SCOTSTARVET. 


THE  family  of  Buccleugh,  of  which  the  Scotts  of  Scotstarvet  are  descended, 
was  originally  seated  in  the  west;  their  ancient  estate  was  Murdiston  in  the 
county  of  Lanark,  which  they  possessed,  at  least  as  early  as  the  reign  of  King 
Alexander  II.  (■/).  Walter  le  Scott  de  Miirthockston  was  one  of  the  gentlemen  of 
Clydesdale  who  went  into  that  submission  that  was  by  fraud  and  force  imposed  on 
the  nation,  by  Edward  I.  of  England,  upon  pretence  of  his  being  Supreme  Lord 
over  the  kingdom  of  Scotland,  in  the  1297  ;  as  is  vouched  from  Prynne's  History 
in  that  record  commonly  called  The  Ragman-Roll.  The  estate  of  Murdiston 
continued  with  the  Scotts  till  the  reign  of  King  James  II.  that  Walter  Scott  of 
Murdiston  did  exchange  those  lands  with  Thomas  Inglis  of  Manor,  for  his  part 
of  the  lands  of  Branksholm,  the  lands  of  Branshaugh,  Goldilands,  Whitelaw,  White- 
rig,  Todshaw,  and  Todholes :  The  charter  of  excambion  is  still  extant  in  the  cus- 
tody of  Alexander  Inglis  of  Murdiston,  which  Mr  Nisbet  says,  in  his  Treatise  of 
Heraldry,  he  had  seen  (6);  it  bears  date  at  Edinburgh,  the  23d  of  July  1446. 
Sir  David  Scott  of  Buccleugh,  his  son,  made  a  very  great  figure  in  the  time  of 
King  James  HI.  both  in  peace  and  war :  By  his  lady,  who  was  a  daughter  of  the 

(a)  Historical  narrative  of  tlie  family  of  Buccleugh,  MSS.  in  my  hands,  vouched  from  the  chsrtularv. 
charters,  and  other  documents  of  antiquities,      {b)  Page  83  and  86. 


oS'o  APPENDIX. 

Somerville  family  (r),  he  had  several  sons;  Sir  Waher,  the  eldest,  (from  whom  a 
lineal  descent  in  the  house  of  Buccleugh  is  continued),  Sir  Alexander  Scott,  who 
was  Rector  of  Wigton,  and  Lord  Register  in  the  reign  of  King  James  ill.  from 
the  1483  till  the  1488,  that  he  lost  his  life,  with  the  king  his  master,  at  the  un- 
happy field  of  Bannockburn  C^J- 

A  third  son  was  Robert,  of  whom  the  Scotts  of  AUanhaugh,  Haining,  and  Scot- 
starvet,  descended ;  to  vouch  which  there  is  a  charter  granted  by  the  foresaid  Sir 
David  Scott  of  Buccleugh,  rfi/ff/s^'w  siio  R'jherto  Scott,  of  the  lands  of  Whiteches- 
ter,  &c.  in  the  year  1483  {e) ;  I  see  it  observed  by  a  gentleman  of  the  surname  of 
Scott,  in  an  Essay  on  the  family  of  the  Scotts,  published  in  the  1688  (/),  that 
this  Robert  Scott  was  the  only  younger  son  of  the  family  of  Buccleugh  of  whom 
any  lawful  male  issue  remained  ;  and  consequently  his  descendants,  now  after 
the  failure  of  heirs-male  in  the  duect  line,  are  the  heirs-male  of  that  illustrious 
family.  One  of  his  sons  was  Sir  Alexander  Scott,  who  is  designed  of  Hassen- 
den  {g) ;  he  was  slain  with  King  James  IV.  at  the  battle  of  Flodden  [b) ;  he  had 
also  the  lands  of  Haining,  at  least  in  fee  ;  for  it  was  a  common  thing  in  those  days 
for  the  father  and  the  eldest  son  to  have  different  titles  and  designations,  more 
especially  in  the  father's  lifetime,  as  might  be  the  case  here.  A  younger  son  of 
this  Sir  Alexander  Scott's,  Wilham  Scott,  was  designed  of  Deloraine,  from  a  patri- 
monial estate  he  had  of  his  own  (.')  in  the  south  in  Teviotdale ;  his  son,  Sir  Alex- 
ander Scott,  was  bred  to  the  law,  and  being  eminent  in  practice,  and  a  man  of 
candour,  diligence,  and  assiduity,  was  made  Vice-Register  of  Scotland  in  the 
1534  {k).  He  had  a  brother,  Mr  James  Scott,  who  was  bred  to  the  church,  and 
after  taking  holy  orders  was  preferred  to  the  provostry  of  Corstorphine,  a  benefice 
both  of  considerable  dignity  and  revenue.  While  Mr  Scott  provost  of  Corstor- 
phine, he  built  a  house  or  manse  for  himself  and  his  successors  in  office,  near  to 
tills  collegiate  church,  on  which  he  placed  his  coat  of  arms,  the  star  and  crescents 
on  the  bend,  as  borne  by  the  House  of  Buccleugh,  which  is  still  to  be  seen  ;  and 
this  is  a  further  confirmation  of  his  descent  from  the  Scotts  of  Buccleugh,  for 
the  heralds  lay  it  down  as  a  maxim  that  the  same  armorial  bearing  is  the  most 
sure  evidence  of  the  same  descent. 

Mr  Scott,  being  a  man  of  learning  and  integrity,  got  into  the  confidence  and 
favour  of  King  James  V.  who  made  him  Clerk  to  the  Treasury  ( /)  ;  and,  from  a 
regard  to  the  memory  and  merit  of  the  old  Register,  Sir  Alexander  Scott,  to  whom 
the  provost  of  Corstorphine  is  called  Comanguineus  (m),  his  majesty  was  pleased  to 
prefer  him  to  be  one  of  the  Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice,  on  the  spiritual  side 
of  the  bench  (tz),  where  he  sat  and  discharged  his  office  with  learning  and  inte- 
grity till  his  death  in  the  1563  (0).  The  provost  of  Corstorphine  took  care  to 
breed  a  nephew  of  his  own,  Mr  Robert  Scott,  afterwards  of  Kmghtspotty,  (nepos 
suus  exfratre)  as  my  voucher  calls  him  (/)),  to  the  law,  in  which  he  soon  became  so 
eminent  a  practitioner,  and  acquired  such  a  character  for  integrity,  that  he  was 
made  one  of  the  two  Principal  Clerks  of  the  Session  (9).  In  that  station  he  be- 
haved with  such  an  universal  reputation,  that,  upon  the  demise  of  Mr  James 
M'Gill  of  Nether-Rankeillor,  the  Lord  Register,  it  was  thought  that  no  body 
could  fill  that  place  better,  or  deserved  it  more ;  and  it  was  at  that  time  beheved, 
that  the  First  Clerk  of  the  Session  had  a  right  to  supply  the  vacancy  when  a  Re- 
gister died  ;  so  the  thing  was  resolved  on  :  but  when  is  was  proposed  to  Mr  Scott 
liimself,  by  a  singular  modesty  he  absolutely  declined  the  offer  [r).     Mr  Hay,  the 

(a)  Manuscript  before  cited  of  the  noble  and  illustrious  family  of  Buccleugh. .  {d}  Lives  and  charac- 
ters of  the  Lord  Registers,  in  the  Second  Volume  of  the  Officers  of  State  in  Scotland,  MSS.  in  my  hand, 
(f)  In  the  hands  of  his  Grace  the  Duke  of  Buccleugh.  (/)  Captain  Walter  Scott,  printed  in  the  year 
1688.  (f)  Ibidem.  (A)  Dr  Abercromby's  Martial  Achievements  of  the  Scots  nation.  (/)  Captain 
Walter  Scott's  Genealogical  and  Historical  Essay  on  the  surname  and  family  of  the  Scotts,  published  in 
the  1 688,  quarto,  which  is  in  several  hands,  particularly  in  the  library  of  the  family  of  Panmure. 
(k)  Original  writs  in  the  custody  of  David  Scott  of  Scotstarvct.  (/)  Writ  under  the  Great  Seal,  in  the 
custody  of  Mr  Scott  of  Scotstarvet.  (m)  The  fore-cited  writ.  («)  Memoirs  of  the  College  of  Justice, 
prefixed  to  Mr  Forbes's  Decisions,  and  the  fore-cited  diploma  in  the  custody  of  Scotstarvet,  under  the 
Great  Seal,  {o)  Ibidem,  (p)  The  deed  under  the  Great  Seal,  in  Scotstarvet's  custody,  so  often  cited 
in  this  memorial,  (y)  Sir  John  Scott's  Account  of  the  Directors  of  the  Chancery,  MSS.  (r)  Sir  John 
Scott  of  Scotstarvet,  in  his  Staggering  State  of  the  Scots  Statesmen,  en  the  Directors  of  the  Chancery, 
MSS.  in.  the  custody  of  David  Scott  of  Scotstarvet,  his  great-grandson,  and  in  several  other  hands. 


APPENDIX.  i^i 

Clerk  of  the  Council  and  Diiectov  of  the  Chancery,  was  not  so  scrupulnus,  for  he 
accepted  of  the  Register's  place  very  cheerfully,  and  the  other  was  prevailed  on 
to  be  Director  of  the  Chancery.  His  gift  to  the  office,  under  the  Great  Seal,  is  in 
the  registers  (r),  bearing  date  the  17th  of  October  1579.  He  discharged  the  duty 
of  his  olTice  \vit!i  greater  diligence  and  exactness  than  had  been  practised  by  his 
predecessors ;  for  whereas  it  had  been  the  custom  to  leave  the  collecting  of  all 
writs  to  the  clerks,  the  Director  only  signing  in  course,  he  read  over  every  tiling  him- 
self before  he  attested  it ;  and  in  that  his  grandson,  Sir  John  Scott,  when  he  came  to 
be  Director  of  the  Chancery,  followed  his  example  :  By  his  place  ho  became  ex- 
ceeding rich,  and  at  his  death  had  more  money  on  land  security  than  any  other 
man  at  that  time,  so  far  as  I  have  been  able  to  discover. 

He  married  first  Elizabeth  Sandilands  of  the  House  of  Galder(/),by  whom  he  had 
a  sun,  Mr  Robert  Scott,  liis  apparent  heir,  who  died  in  the  lifetime  of  his  father. 
He  married  afterwards  Elizabeth  Scott,  who  survived  him,  and  was  long  his  re- 
lict («)  ;  by  her  he  had  a  son,  Mr  James  Scott  of  Vogrie  (v),  who  Was  one  of  the 
writers  or  clerks  in  the  Chancery,  and  of  w  horn  several  persons  of  distinction  are 
descended.  The  Director,  Mr  Scott,  growing  old,  with  the  consent  and  approbation  of 
the  King's  Majesty,  resigned  his  office  in  favour  of  his  eldest  son,  Mr  Robert  Scott, 
who  thereupon  was  confirmed  in  it,  by  a  gift  under  the  Great  Seal  the  5th  of 
March  1585  (iv),  during  life, //o  omnibus  diebus  vitissua,  with  a  power  of  deputa- 
tion. But  the  old  man  wisely  apprehending  that  his  son  might  happen  to  die 
before  himself,  got  it  so  ordered  that  he  should  in  that  case  return  to  the  office  ; 
the  thing  fell  out  so  ;  the  young  Director  died  in  his  father's  lifetime,  the  23d  of 
November  1588  (.v).  He  left  behind  him  an  only  son,  John  Scott,  by  Margaret 
his  wife,  daughter  of  Alexander  Acheson  of  Gosford  (  y),  in  the  county  of  Had- 
dington, ancestor  to  Sir  Arthur  Acheson  of  Markethill,  Baronet  of  Scotland, 
who  has  an  opulent  estate  in  the  county  of  Armagh  in  Ireland  :  His  great-grand- 
father. Sir  Archibald  Atcheson  of  Glencairn,  was  one  of  the  Senators  of  the  Col- 
lege of  Justice,  and  one  of  the  principal  Secretaries  of  State  in  the  reign  of  King 
Charles  I.  and  died  in  those  offices  in  the  year  1634  (z).  Upon  the  death  of  Mr 
Scott,  the  young  Director  of  the  Chancery,  his  father,  the  old  man,  was  restored  to 
his  office:  but  worn  out  with  grief  and  old  age,  he  found  himself  unable  to  under- 
go the  fatigue  of  it;  and  therefore  resigned  in  favour  of  a  gentleman  of  his  own 
name,  Sir  William  Scott  of  Ardross,  his  lady's  son  by  a  former  husband  ;  but  he 
took  an  obligation  of  Sir  William,  to  resign  in  favour  of  his  grandson,  John  Scott, 
afterwards  Sir  John  Scott  of  Scotstarvet,  whenever  he  came  to  be  of  age  {a).  He 
died  on  the  28th  of  March  1592  (5),  and  was  succeeded  in  his  estate  by  his  grand- 
son and  heir,  John  Scott  of  Knightspotty,  not  then  full  seven  years  old.  During 
the  minority,  Sir  William's  obligation  was  lost,  by  which  means  it  cost  Sir  John 
afterwards  some  trouble  and  expence  before  he  could  have  right  done  him. 

This  great  man.  Sir  Johk  Scott  of  Scotstarvet,  proved  an  honour  to  his  family 
and  country.  He  was  born  in  the  year  1586,  and  as,  from  his  very  childhood,  he 
discovered  a  more  than  ordinary  genius  for  letters,  his  friends,  who  had  the  care  of 
his  education,  gave  him  the  best  his  country  could  afford.  He  went  through  a 
course  of  philosophical  studies  at  St  Andrews,  and  took  his  degree  of  Master  of 
Arts.  After  that,  though  he  was  heir  of  a  great  estate,  and  the  only  son  of  his  fa- 
ther, he  went  into  a  close  course  of  study,  not  only  of  the   civil  and   canon   law, 


(j)  In  the  archives  at  Edinburgh.  (t)  Registers  of  the  Heralds'  Officers  at  Edinburgh,  in  the 
hands  of  !\Ir  Roderick  Chalmers.  (u)  Charters  and  infeftments,  both  in  Scotstarvet's  hands  and 
in  the  Chancery,  ivhere  her  liferent  is  reserved,  (v')  Charta  penes  Scotstarvet,  and  Nisbet's  Heraldry, 
where  he  has  inserted  the  arms  of  this  branch  of  the  family  as  a  younger  son  of  the  Scotts  of  Knight- 
spotty, which  was  the  first  Director's  stile  and  title.  {w)  Charta  penes  David  Scott  de  Scotstarvet. 
(x)  Retour,  in  the  archives  of  the  family  of  Scotstarvet,  of  John  Scott  to  Mr  Robert  Scott,  his  father, 
in  the  lands  of  Knightspotty,  in  the  shire  of  Perth,  and  regality  of  Abernethy.  {y)  The  Heralds' 
Books  at  Edinburgh.  (2)  Sir  James  Balfour  of  Kinnaird's  Annals,  in  the  Advocates'  Library  at 
Edinburgh.  MSS.  (a)  Sir  John  Scott  of  Scotstarvet's  own  account  of  the  matter  in  MSS.  in  his  State  of 
the  Scots  Statesmen.     (J>)  Charta  penes  David  Scott  de  Scotstarvet,  ad  annum  1592. 


Vol.  n.  7  I 


2  82  APPENDIX. 

but  also  of  the  municipal  law  of  the  kingdom.  This  led  him  to  look  far  into  our 
history  and  records,  by  vhich  he  came  to  understand  our  wliole  constitution  as  fully, 
if  not  moie  so  than  any  man  of  his  tmie.  He  quickly  attamtd  a  great  reputation  for 
learning,  and  was,  through  his  whole  life,  a  man  of  strict  and  exemplary  virtue, 
equalled  by  few,  and  excelled  by  none  of  his  contemporaries  m  any  of  those  qua- 
lities that  enter  into  the  composition  of  a  great  and  good  character.  He  was  a 
bountiful  patron  to  men  of  learnmg,  and  they  came  to  him  from  all  quarters  ;  so 
that  his  house  was  a  kind  of  college.  Such  a  character  could  not  long  be  concealed, 
the  fame  of  it  reached  the  Court,  and  induced  the  government  to  employ  him  as  a 
man  that  would  add  strength  and  lustre  to  the  administration.  His  title  to  the  Di- 
rector's place  being  well  known,  Sir  William  Scott  was  wrought  upon  to  resign  in 
his  favour;  thus  he  came  to  be  possessed  of  that  office  his  father  and  grandfather  had 
so  long  enjoyed.  With  all  the  passion  he  had  for  learning,  he  was  not  inattentive 
to  the  interests  of  his  family,  but  managed  them  always  with  the  greatest  regard, 
both  to  justice  and  humanity.  When  a  gentleman  of  his  relation,  Inglis  of  Tar- 
vet,  was  by  the  necessity  of  his  affairs  obliged  to  sell  his  estate,  Sir  John  bought 
it,  but  he  would  not  leave  him  without  house  or  home  ;  and  therefore  very  ge- 
nerously gave  him,  for  a  consideration  far  below  the  value,  the  lands  of  Knight- 
rpotty,  that  he  might  have  a  place  of  retreat  in  his  declining  age. 

Having  finished  this  transaction,  he  expede  a  deed  under  the  Great  Seal,  erect- 
ing and  incorporating  the  lands  and  estates  of  Inglis-Tarvet  and  Wemyss-Tarvet 
into  a  new  barony,  to  be  in  all  time  thereafter  called  the  barony  of  Scotstarvet. 
The  charter  of  erection  is  of  date  the  nth  of  September  1611  (c).  When  King 
James  VI.  was  in  Scotland  in  the  year  1617,  he  had  the  honour  to  be  presented  to 
his  majesty,  who  had  much  discourse  with  him  upon  some  parts  of  our  constitution, 
in  which  he  gave  the  king  great  satisfaction,  and  showed  himself  well  versed  in 
that  study.  It  was  at  this  time  he  was  knighted,  and  the  king  ordered  him  im- 
mediately to  be  added  to  the  Privy  Council;  in  which  station  he  continued  till  the 
end  ot  that  reign.  King  Charles  I.  upon  his  accession,  was  graciously  pleased  to 
renew  his  commission  as  Director  of  the  Chancery,  which,  the  narrative  bears,  his 
royal  father  had  before  given  him  for  life  {d).  He  was  soon  after  named  one  of  his 
Majesty's  Privy  Council ;  and,  in  consideration  of  the  great  and  faithful  services 
done  to  the  crown  by  his  father,  grandfather,  and  others  of  his  predecessors,  for 
many  years  past,  in  the  office  of  Directors  of  the  Chancery,  as  the  narrative  bears, 
his  Majesty  gave  the  directorship  again  to  Sir  John  himself,  and  to  James  Scott, 
his  son,  for  their  joint  hves,  by  a  commission  under  the  Great  Seal,  dated  at  White- 
hall the  5th  of  April  1628  (e).  I  have  not  been  able  to  learn  the  precise  time  of 
Sir  John's  promotion  to  be  one  of  the  Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice;  nor  whe- 
ther it  was  before  the  troubles  began,  though  I  have  reason,  I  think,  to  believe  it 
was :  But  it  is  a  thing  much  for  his  honour,  that  when  the  Session  was  new  model- 
led by  the  king,  with  consent  of  Parliament  in  the  1641,  he  was  one  of  the  judges 
who  were  then  continued  in  their  offices,  which  they  were  to  hold  r/rf  vita?n  aut  cul- 
pam  (f).  He  discharged  the  duties  of  that  station  with  gravity,  learning,  and 
great  ability,  till  the  year  1651,  that  Cromwell  dissolved  the  courts  of  justice,  and 
overturned  the  whole  constitution  :  upon  this  Sir  John  not  only  lost  his  place  in 
rhe  Session,  but  was  also  turned  out  of  the  Chancery  on  pretence  that  the  office 
depended  on  the  College  of  Justice  (^)  :  but  this  was  a  mere  pretence.  Deprived 
thus  illegally  of  all  his  offices,  in  which  he  had  served  his  country  with  universal 
approbation,  he  was  more  at  leisure  to  employ  himself  in  the  advancement  of 
learning,  and  the  doing  honour  to  his  country  in  that  way.  He  made  a  collection 
of  all  the  Latin  poems  that  had  been  lately  composed  by  his  countrymen,  which, 
at  his  own  expence,  he  caused  publish  at  Amsterdam  in  anno  1632,  in  two  decimo- 
sexto volumes,  on  a  fine  type,  under  the  title  of,  BelicicK  Poetarum  Scotorum  hujus 
avi  illustriuin.     The  learned  Dr  Arthur  Johnston  dedicates  them  to  Sir  John  thus : 

(f)  Charter  under  the  Great  Seal  in  the  archives  of  the  family  of  Scotstarvet.  (</)  Charta  penes  Scot- 
starvet, dated  the  6th  of  May  1625.  U)  Charta  penes  Scotstarvet ;  in  the  gift  the  king  designs  Sir  John, 
Prffidilectus  Consiliaiius  noster.  (f)  Rescinded  acts  of  Parliament,  {g)  Sir  John  Scott  says  this  him- 
self in  the  account  he  gives  of  the  Directors  of  the  Chancery,  in  the  State  of  the  Scots  Statesmen,  from 
the  1550  till  the  1650. 


APPENDIX.  iijj, 

Slobili  niusarum  Maecenuti,  Domino  Joaiini  Scoto  Scototarvntio,  EquUi,  Dircctori  Can- 
cel'ai  .'  r,  at  Regio  apud  Scotos  Consiliario.  The  printing  the  Scots  Poems  was  not 
the  only  service  Sa-  John  did  his  country  in  the  way  of  learning,  tor  that  general 
body  ot"  the  Geogiaphy  of  Scotland,  the  Theatrum  Scotiie  in  Bleuu's  Atlas,  may 
not  improperly  be  called  his  work.  He  projected  this  great  undertaking,  and  it 
A  as  carried  on  ;K  his  expence  (.-?).  He  encouraged  tlie  ingenious  and  industrious 
Timothy  Pont  in  his  Survey  of  the  whole  Kingdom,  took  draughts  himself  upon 
the  spot,  and  added  such  observations  on  the  Monuments  of  Antiquity,  and  other 
curiosities,  as  were  proper  to  render  the  descriptions  more  complete  and  useful : 
But  Mr  Pont  was  unhappily  surprised  by  death,  to  the  inexpressible  loss  of  his 
country,  when  he  had  well  nigh  finished  this  work.  His  valuable  collections  fal- 
ling into  the  hands  of  his  relations,  run  a  great  risque  of  being  lost,  if  they  had  not 
been  seasonably  inquired  after  by  his  patron,  Sir  John,  who  happily  recovered  and 
got  possession  of  them. 

And  that  so  useful  a  design  might  not  be  defeated  by  this  accident,  he  put  Mr 
Pont's  papers  into  the  liands  of  the  learned  Robert  Gordon  of  Straloch,  who,  to- 
gether with  Mr  James  Gordon,  his  son,  surveyed  other  parts  of  the  kingdom  that 
either  had  been  neglected  by  Mr  Pont,  or  of  which  the  draughts  v/ere  lost.  Thus 
were  those  gentlemen  furnished  with  materials  for  the  admirable  descriptions, 
which  are  no\V  printed,  with  the  forty-six  maps  of  that  noble  work.  Many,  if  not 
all  the  illustrations,  especially  those  that  relate  to  families,  were,  to  my  certain 
knowledge,  given  by  Sir  John,  who  was  not  only  the  projector,  as  we  have  obser- 
ved, of  this  Atlas,  but  had  himself  a  great  share  in  the  work,  and  was  solely  at 
the  charge  of  the  publication  ;  which  that  it  might  be  done  with  the  greater  ex- 
actness, he  went  over  to  Holland,  and  staid  some  time  at  Amsterdam  (6)  :  Both 
Sir  John  and  his  friend,  indeed,  were  ill  used  by  the  publisher,  who,  in  the  edition 
1655,  preilxed  a  dedication  to  Oliver  Cromwell,  instead  of  one  to  King  Charles  II. 
that  Sir  John  had  prepared,  though  the  king  was  then  in  exile  (c)  ;  and  Bleau, 
the  printer,  prefaced  the  whole,  with  Buchanan's  Dialogue,  De  jure  Regni  apud 
Scotos.  This  was  hard  on  men  of  their  loyal  principles  ;  for  his,  Sir  John  had  suf- 
fered ;  Cromwell,  not  content  to  strip  him  of  all  his  employments,  had  laid  a  fine 
upon  him  of  L.1000  Sterling,  when  he  gave  what  he  called  his  Act  of  Grace ;  which 
fine  Sir  John  paid  in  the  year  1654. 

During  the  Usurpation  he  lived  m  retreat,  with  that  caution  that  became  a  wise 
man  in  such  perilous  times.  His  studies,  his  correspondence  with  learned  men, 
both  at  home  and  abroad,  and  conversation  with  such  of  them  as  he  had  opportu- 
nity to  see,  were  the  agreeable  employments  of  his  retirement :  and  there  are  still 
preserved  in  the  Advocates'  Library  marks  of  those  correspondencies  in  a  collec- 
tion of  his  letters  in  Latin,  that  show  a  distinguishing  taste.  His  intimate  friends 
were  chiefly,  that  fine  gentleman  Sir  Robert  Kerr,  afterwards  Earl  of  Ancrum,  the 
polite  historiographer  Mr  Drummond  of  Hawthornden,  his  own  brother-in-law,  the 
two  Johnstons,  the  great  antiquary  Sir  James  Balfour  of  Denmiln,  Lord  Lyon,  his  neigh- 
bour in  the  country,  and  the  members  of  tlie  University  of  St  Andrews,  in  which  he 
had  had  his  education,  in  and  to  which  he  gave  great  marks  of  his  beneficence.  He 
procured  from  the  king  an  addition  of  L.io  a-year  to  the  masters'  salaries,  that  were 
before  that  time  very  small ;  he  gave  himself  a  handsome  collection  of  books  to 
the  library  of  St  Leonard's  College,  and  prevailed  with  his  cousin  and  chief,  Fran- 
cis Earl  of  Buccleugh,  to  give  them  many  of  the  best,  in  all  sciences,  finely  bound 
and  gilt,  with  his  coat  of  arms  on  the  cover,  and  tliey  are  still  preserved  there  very 
carefully.  Observing  that  St  Leonard's  College  wanted  a  Profession  of  Humanity, 
he  founded  one,  of  which  he  reserved  to  himself  and  his  heirs  the  sole  right  of  pre- 
sentation ;  a  noble  monument  of  him,  and  worthy  of  such  a  man  I  Nor  did  his 
bounty  run  only  in  that  channel ;  for,  from  a  regard  to  the  city  of  Glasgow,  the 
chief  trading  town  in  the  west,  from  which  country  he  reckoned  himself  to  have 
derived   his   original,  as  being  descended  of  the  Scotts  of  Murdiston,  he  mortified 

{a)  As  the  reverend  and  learned  Dr  William  Nicolson,  Bishop  of  Carlisle,  observes  in  his  Scots  His- 
torical Library,  p.  17.  and  s:iys  he  was  a  complete  mathematician,  both  by  nature  and  education. 
(A)  This  he  tells  us  himself  in  his  state  of  the  Scots  Statesmen,  (c)  Act  of  indemnity  by  Cromwell  to 
Scotland  in  165.),  printed  in  the  Appendix  to  the  Lives  of  the  officers  of  State  in  Scotland- 


-S4  APPENDIX. 

the  lands  of  Pickle  and  Pickieniill,  for  breeding  four  apprentices  there.  The  pre- 
sentation of  three  he  reserved  to  hiniseli"  and  his  heirs-male  ;  in  default  of  which, 
as  a  mark  of  regard  to  his  chief,  it  goes  to  the  family  of  Buccleugh  ;  the  other  he 
gave  to  the  magistrates  and  town-council  (a).  As  Sir  John  outlived  the  Usurpa- 
tion, it  was  reasonable  to  expect,  that,  upon  the  king's  return,  he  should  be  restor- 
■dd  to  his  former  offices  ;  and  it  is  just  matter  of  wonder  that  he  was  not. 

The  only  account  that  can  be  given  of  it  seems  to  be  this,  that  almost  every 
man  then  lay  at  mercy,  for  what  might  be  construed  compliance  with  the  Usurpa- 
tion, by  which  the  mmisters  had  great  room  left  them  for  partiality  and  private 
views ;  a  dangerous  mistake  in  the  government  at  that  time.  In  the  account  he 
gives  of  it  himself,  he  complains  of  ill  usage,  especially  that  the  offices  taken  from 
him,  and  which  he  held  for  hfe,  should  have  been  given  to  the  son  of  a  man  noted 
for  his  compliance  ;  but  he  thought  not  lit  to  dispute  the  matter. 

The  rest  of  his  days  were  spent  at  his  country  seat,  where  he  lived  free  from  all 
business,  but  the  necessary  affairs  of  his  own  family,  retaining  his  vivacity  and 
vigour  of  mind  to  the  age  of  84,  at  which  he  died  in  1670. 

Sir  John  married  three  wives,  the  first  was  Anne,  daughter  to  Sir  John  Drum- 
mond  of  Hawthornden,  son  to  Sir  Robert  Drummond  of  Carnock,  by  Dame  Anne, 
his  wife,  daughter  to  Robert  Lord  Elphinstone ;  by  whom  he  had  two  sons.  Sir 
fames,  the  eldest,  who  was  joined  with  himself  in  the  Director's  place,  and  was 
knighted  by  King  Charles  I.  at  Newcastle  in  1646  ;  but  died  in  the  lifetime  ot 
his  father  anno  1650,  leaving  issue  by  the  Lady  Marjory  Carnegie,  his  wife, 
daughter  to  John  Earl  of  Ethie,  sister  to  David  Earl  of  Northesk,  two  sons,  James, 
his  grandfather's  successor,  and  David  who  succeeded  his  brother  in  his  estate  (of 
whom  afterwards).  Sir  John  Scott  had  by  his  first  lady  a  second  son,  John  Scott 
of  Gibleston,  of  whom  the  Scotts  of  that  race  are,  descended.  He  had  also  several 
daughters. 

Jean,  who  was  married  to  John  Gordon  of  Buckie^  and  again  to  Henry  Elphin- 
stone of  Calderhall,  had  no  issue. 

,  the  second,  to Spittal  of  Leuchat  in  Fife,  but  had  no 

issue. 

Anne,  the  third,  to  Colonel  Robert  Cunningham,  brother  to  William  Earl  of 
Glencairn,  who  was  Lord  Chancellor  at  the  Restoration,  and  had  one  daughter, 
who  was  married  to  William  Macilvane  of  Grimet,  in  the  county  of  Ayr,  and  had 
issue. 

Rebecca,  the  fourth,  was  married  to  Mr  John  Ellis  of  Elliston,  Advocate,  and 
had  issue. 

Margaret,  the  fifth,  to  John  Trotter  of  Charterhall,  and  again  to  John  Mur- 
ray of  Philiphaugh,  and  had  issue. 

Janet,  the  sixth. 

The  seventh  died  unmarried.  She  was  a  young  lady  of  great  beauty  ;  but 
more  remarkable  still  for  the  fineness  of  her  parts  :  she  had  a  great  genius  for 
learning,  which  her  father  much  encouraged.  She  attained  to  a  good  degree  of 
knowledge,  both  in  the  Latin  and  Greek  tongues,  and  composed  a  poem  in 
Latin  on  King  Charles  II.  when  he  was  in  Scotland,  which  she  presented  to  his 
majesty,  and  had  the  honour  thereupon  to  receive  from  him  a  ring  of  considerable 
value. 

Sir  John's  second  lady  was  Margaret,  daughter  of  Sir  James  Melville  of  Halhill, 
who  wrote  the  Memoirs  of  the  Reign  of  Qiieen  Mary  and  King  James  VI.;  by 
whom  he  had  a  son,  George  Scott  of  Pitlochie,  who,  being  a  rigid  presbyterian, 
\v'hen  that  party  was  under  restraint  in  the  exercise  of  their  rehgion,  he,  and  his 
lady,  who  was  a  daughter  of  Rigg  of  Ethernie,  resolved  to  go  over,  with  others  of 
their  countrymen,  to  settle  a  colony  in  Carolina;  but  they  both  died  in  their 
voyage  in  1683  (b). 

Sir  John's  third  and  last  marriage  was  with  Margaret,  daughter  to 

Monypenny  of  Pitmillie,  widow  of Rigg  of  Ethernie,  by  whom  he  had 

(a)  The  original  mortification  is  in  the  hands  of  Mr  Scott  of  Scotstarvet.  (b)  Mr  Wodrow's  His- 
tory of  the  Persecutions  of  the  Presbyterians. 


APPENDIX.  285 

a  son,  Walter  Scott  of  Edinshead,  whose  daughter  and  heir-female  is  married  to 
Mr  Charles  Erskine,  brother  to  tlie  Earl  of  Buchan. 

James  succeeded  his  grandfiither;  but  he  dying  unmarried  the  estate  fell  to  his 
brother  David. 

This  gentleman,  with  a  happy  talent  for  economy,  had  a  remarkable  benevolence, 
of  both  which  he  gave  lasting  proofs;  by  the  one  he  greatly  improved  his  own  fa- 
mily estate,  and  by  the  other  he  preserved  some  families  in  his  neighbourhood. 
The  estate  came  to  him  indeed  much  impaired  ;  Sir  John  had  in  effect  diviaed  it 
amongst  the  children  of  his  several  marriages;  but  he,  by  his  good  husbandry, 
without  the  help  of  any  public  employment,  and  with  a  most  unblemished  re- 
putation, raised  it  higher  than  it  ever  had  been  before,  living  at  the  same 
time  agreeably,  and  doing  kind  offices  to  his  friends :  Frugality,  which,  in  some 
men,  is  the  tyranny  of  a  predominant  passion,  was,  in  him,  a  real  virtue,  the  effect 
of  prudence,  and  of  that  moderation  which  is  natural  to  a  well  ordered  mind,  al- 
ways easy,  and  chearful;  he  needed  not  those  amusements  that  arc  vainly  sought 
from  expence,  nor  was  tempted  to  pursue  pleasure,  as  the  relief  or  cure  of  disquiet; 
thus  it  increased,  his  fortune,  without  diminishing  his  satisfactions,  and  accompanied 
with  an  hearty  good-will  to  his  neighbours,  rendered  him  more  respected  by  them; 
and  not  less  beloved.  As  his  character  united  in  it  several  virtues  rarely  found 
together,  it  showed  how  much  strengh  and  beauty  they  receive  from  such  an 
union ;  a  regular  and  exact  economy  enabled  him  to  do  those  good  offices,  to  which 
his  benevolence  prompted  him,  and  his  prudence  rendered  them  so  highly  bene- 
ficial as  they  were;  by  that,  they  were  not  only  well  meant,  but  well  understood, 
seasonably  employed,  and  to  the  best  purpose.  Blessed  with  these  happy  quah- 
ties,  he  naturally,  and  with  ease,  attained  what  a  wise  man  might  passionately 
wish  for,  to  live  with  quiet  and  satisfaction,  and  leave  in  his  family  the  fruit  of 
his  labours  and  a  fair  example.  He  died  5th  June  1718,  in  the  73d  year  of  his 
age. 

His  first  marriage  was  with  Nicolas,  eldest  daughter  of  Sir  John  Grierson  of 
Lag,  by  Isabel,  his  wife,  daughter  of  Robert  Lord  Boyd,  by  whom  he  had  one  only 
daughter,  Marjory,  who  was  married  to  David,  the  fourth  Viscount  of  Stormont, 
to  whom  she  bore  many  children  of  both  sexes;  and  to  this  marriage  the  nation 
owes  that  great  ornament  of  his  profession,  and  of  his  country,  the  Honourable 
William  Murray  of  Lincoln's-Inn. 

His  second  wife  was  a  very  near  relation  of  his  own,  Elizabeth,  the  eldest  daughter 
of  Mr  John  Ellis  of  Elliston,  advocate,  a  great  lawyer,  and  a  fine  gentleman;  by 
whom  he  had  an  only  son,  David  Scott,  now  of  Scotstarvet,  who  married  Lucy, 
daughter  of  Sir  Robert  Gordon  of  Gordonston,  Premier  Baronet  of  Scotland,  bV 
whom  he  has  issue,  two  sons  and  two  daughters:  He  had  also  two  daughters, 
Marjory,  who  was  married  to  Peter  Ogilvie,  younger  of  Balfour,  and  had  issue;  and 
Elizabeth,  to  Alexander,  the  fourth  Earl  of  Balcarras,  and  is  now  Countess  Dowa- 
ger of  Balcarras. 

From  this  deduction  of  the  pedigree  of  the  family  of  Scotstarvet,  it  is  plain  that 
they  are  descended  of  Robert  Scott,  a  third  son  of  Buccleugh,  and  are  the  only 
heirs-male  now  remaining  of  any  younger  brother,  (the  two  families  of  Allanhaugh 
and  Haining,  likewise  descended  of  the  same  Robert,  being  extinct)  and  of  conse- 
quence the  heirs-male  of  that  most  noble  family,  whose  arms  they  carry,  with  the 
cognizance  and  distinction  of  a  younger  son,  and  are  thus  blazoned  by  Mr 
Nisbet,  in  his  Treatise  of  Heraldry  (a),  viz.  Scott  of  Scotstarvet  carries  the  same 
arms  as  Buccleugh,  or,  on  a  bend  azure,  a  star  betwixt  two  crescents  of  the  field, 
within  a  bordure  ingrailed  gules;  crest,  a  right  hand  holding  an  annulet,  and 
therein  a  carbuncle,  proper;  with  the  motto,  lii  tenebris  lux. 

The  author  has  also  blazoned  several  other  armorial  bearings  of  gentlemen  of 
the  surname  of  Scott,  that  are  branched  off,  and  descended  of  the  family  of  Scots- 
tarvet: As 

James  Scott  of  Vogrie,,  son  of  Mr  Robert  Scott,  one  of  the  Clerks  of  the  Chan- 

(a)   Page  97. 

Vol.  II.  7  K 


286  APPENDIX. 

eery,  a  younger  son  of  Scotstarvet,  or,  on  a  bend  azure,  a  star  between  two  cres- 
cents of  the  field,  all  within  a  bordure  parted  per  pale,  gules  and  azure,  the  dexter 
side  ingrailed,  and  the  sinister  indented ;  crest,  a  dexter  hand  holding  a  ring,  pro- 
per: motto,  Nescit  amor  fines. 

Mr  George  Scott  of  Gibliston,  sometime  Steward  of  Orkney,  another  cadet  of 
Scotstarvet,  carries  the  arms  of  that  family,  quartered  with  azure,  three  boars'  heads 
couped  or,  holding  in  his  mouth  four  arrows  gules,  feathered  and  headed  argent: 
motto,  Do  well,  and  let  them  say. 

George  Scott  of  Pitlochie  carries  the  full  arms  of  Scotstarvet,  with  a  mullet  for 
difference,  with  the  same  crest  and  motto  the  family  of  Scotstarvet  carries. 

Mr  James  Scotf,  Sheriff-Clerk  of  Edinburgh,  descended  of  the  family  of  Knight- 
spotty,  or,  on  a  bend  azure,  a  star  betwixt  two  crescents  of  the  first,  all  within  a 
bordure  ingrailed  ^w/f/,  charged  with  eight  besants;  crest,  an  arm  and  hand  hold- 
ing a  book  half  opened,  proper:  motto,  Fidelitas. 

Scott  of  Letham,  a  younger  son  of  the  family  of  Scotstarvet,  carries  the  same 
arms,  with  a  mullet  for  his  brotherly  diff^erence(rt). 

Scott  of  Ely  and  Ardross,  being  of  the  same  blood  and  stem  with  the  Scotts  of 
Scotstarvet  {b~),  carried  or,  on  a  bend  azure,  a  star  betwixt  two  crescents  of  the  first, 
within  a  bordure  gules,  charged  with  eight  besants  or.  Sir  William  Scott  of  Ely 
and  Ardioss  was  one  of  the  Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice,  and  sometime  Direc- 
tor of  the  Chancery  in  the  reign  of  King  James  VI.  His  blood  is  mixed  with 
very  many  of  the  prime  nobility  of  Scotland  ;  for  he  had  one  daughter  married  to 
the  Lord  Blantyre,  and  another  who  was  married  to  Sir  WiUiam  Cochran  of  Cowden, 
thereafter  Lord  Cochran  and  Earl  of  Dundonald,  with  whose  family  a  great  many 
of  the  nobihty  of  Scotland  are  allied  in  marriage.  By  this  we  see  the  arms  and 
family  of  Scott  of  Ardross  a  very  frequent  branch  on  escutcheons  at  the  funerals 
of  people  of  the  first  rank  in  the  kingdom. 


Qf  the  ancient  family  of  SCOTT  of  Eskdale,  who  had  his  residence  betwixt 
White-Esk.  and  Black.-Esk,  called  Castlelour. 


THE  first  of  this  family  was  Arthur  Scott  of  Eskdale,  who  married  a  daughter 
of  Maxwell  of  Terreagles,  thereafter  Lord  Herries,  now  Earl  of  Nithsdale,  and  was 
succeeded  by  his  son, 

Robert  Scott  of  Houpayslay,  Warden  of  the  Middle  Border  between  Scotland 
and  England,  who  married  a  daughter  of  the  Lord  Somerville's ;  by  whom  he  had 
issue 

Sir  William  Scott  of  Houpayslay,  who  married  a  daughter  of  Gladstanes  of 
Cocklaw;  by  whom  he  had  issue 

Sir  William  Scott  of  Houpayslay,  who  married  a  daughter  of  Douglas  of  Cavers, 
by  whom  he  had  several  sons,  the  eldest  whereof  was  Abbot  of  Melrose ;  the  se- 
cond, who  succeeded  him,  was  David,  who,  by  the  favour  of  his  eldest  brother,  the 
Abbot,  got  the  lands  of  Thirlestane,  from  which  the  family  has  ever  since  taken 
its  designation;  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son 

Robert  Scott,  who  married  a  daughter  of  — ■ Johnstone  of  that  Ilk,  now 

Marquis  of  Annandale,  by  whom  he  had  five  sons;  the  first,  John,  who  succeeded; 
the  second,  Scott  of  Hundleshope ;  the  third,  Scott  of  Dryhope,  the  fourth,  Scott  of 
Mountbenger,  the  fifth,  Scott  of  Bowhill. 

John  Scott  of  Thirlestane  succeeded  his  father,  and  had  many  honours  confer- 
red upon  him  for  his  loyalty  and  firm  adherence  to  King  James  V.  more  fully 
noticed  in  the  First  Volume  of  this  System,  page  97.     He  married  a  daughter  of 

(a)  Nisbet's  Heraldry,  p.  98.  aforesaid.  (^b^  Captain  Walter  Scott,  in  his  Treatise  of  the  Name  of 
Scott,  says.  That  of  William  Scott  of  Deloraine  are  descended  Scotstarvet  and  Ardross. 


APPENDIX.  287 

Scott  of  Allaiiliaugh,  by  whom  he  had  four  sons  and  two  daughters;  first,  Robert, 
who  succeeded  him  ;  second,  Simon,  culled  Longspear,  who  was  tutor  of  Thirle- 
stane,  of  whom  came  Scott  of  Newburgh,  from  w-hom  are  descended  the  Scotts  of 
Ranaldburn;  third,  Antirew,  who  died  without  issue;  the  fourth,  Adam,  of  whom 
are  descended  the  Scotts  of  Gilmerscleugh ;  the  eldest  daughter,  Margaret,  was 
married  to  Johnstone  of  that  Ilk;  the  youngest  daughter,  Jean,  was  married  to 
Johnstone  of  Wampliray. 

Robert  Scott  of  Thirlestane  was  Warden-Depute  of  the  West-Borders,  and 
married  Lady  Margaret  Scott,  sister  to  the  Lord  Buccleugh,  by  wliom  he  had 
three  sons;  the  first.  Sir  Robert,  his  heir;  tiie  second,  William,  of  whom  are  de- 
scended the  Scotts  of  Merrylaw ;  the  third,  Walter,  who  was  killed  by  John 
Scott  of  Tushilaw,  in  a  duel  at  Deucharswyre,  leaving  issue  two  sons,  Simon,  the 
eldest,  and  Patrick  of  Tanlawhill,  great-grandfather  to  the  present  Francis  Lord 
Napier. 

Sir  Robert  Scott  of  Thirlestane,  his  eldest  son,  who  married  a  daughter  of 
Cranston  of  that  Ilk,  by  whom  he  had  issue  Sir  Robert  Scott  of  Cruxton,  who 
married  Lady  Mary  Lion,  daughter  to  the  Earl  of  Strathmore,  but  died  without 
issue.  Secondly,  Sir  Robert  married  Dame  Katharine  Jardine,  daughter  to  Sir 
Alexander  Jardine  of  Applegirth,  by  whom  he  had  issue  Sir  John  Scott  of  Thirle- 
stane, and  several  daughters. 

Sir  John  Scott  of  Thirlestane  married  Dame  Euphame  Young,  relict  to  Sir  Da- 
vid Ogilvie  of  Clova,  by  whom  he  had  issue,  Francis  and  Katharine; 

And,  in  the  year  1641,  intrusted  Patrick  Scott  of  Tanlawhill,  his  cousin,  for- 
merly mentioned,  with  the  whole  management  of  his  estate  and  affairs,  in  order  to 
join  the  noble  Marquis  of  Montrose  in  his  unfortunate  wars;  and  being  under 
cloud  till  the  1660,  by  which  time  he  being  infirm,  and  unable  to  go  about  his 
affairs,  and  dying  in  the  1666,  left  his  son,  Francis,  in  infancy,  and  but  a  small  part 
of  his  estate  in  possession. 

Francis  married  a  daughter  of  Robert  Douglas  of  Auchintully,  by  whom  he  had 
issue  six  sons,  viz.  first,  John,  second,  Robert,  third,  William,  fourth,  Francis,  fifth, 
James,  sixth,  David,  and  two  daughters,  Anne  and  Mary. 

John,  the  eldest  son  of  the  said  Francis  Scott,  died  unmarried,  and  was  succeed- 
ed by  Robert,  his  second  brother,  who  is  now  called  Davington,  who  is  heir-male 
and  of  line  to  the  foresaid  ancient  family  of  Scott  of  Houpayslay  and  Thirlestane, 
and,,  as  such,  with  the  assistance  of  his  other  brothers,  is  presently  insisting  for  the 
said  estate,  which  was  carried  off"  from  the  family,  by  a  deed  of  trust  granted  to 
the  said  Patrick  Scott  of  Tanlawhill,  which  is  now  under  reduction  before  the 
Lords  of  Session. 

The  ancient  armorial  bearing  of  this  family,  described  upon  a  very  old  plate  of  lead, 
still  extant  in  their  possession,  is,  on  a  bend,  a  mullet  betwixt  two  crescents,  be- 
twixt a  bow  full  bent,  discharging  an  arrow  in  chief,  and  a  hunting-horn,  garnish- 
ed and  stringed  in  base;  which  last  figures  have  probably  been  added  on  account 
of  some  brave  actions  performed  by  the  family. 

This  appears  to  have  been  the  ancient  bearing  of  this  family,  till  his  Majesty 
King  James  V.  for  the  good  services  performed  to  him  by  the  above-mentioned 
John  Scott  of  Thirlestane  at  Soutra-edge,  granted  to  him  a  bordure  of  flower-de- 
luces  about  his  coat  of  arms,  sicklike  as  on  his  royal  banner,  and  a  bundle  of 
lances  above  his  helmet ;  with  this  motto.  Ready,  ay  ready,  as  described  in  the 
First  Volume  of  this  System,  page  96.  And  these  arms  have  ever  since  been  car- 
ried by  the  flimily,  with  supporters,  Stc.  as  there  blazoned. 


APPENDIX. 


The  families  of  CUNNINGHAM  of  Polmaise  and  Drumquhassell,  now 
REPRESENTED  BY  WILLIAM  CUNNINGHAM  of  Bandalloch. 


THE  original  of  the  surname  of  Cunningham,  and  of  the  family  of  Kilmaurs, 
or  Glencairn,  the  chief  family  of  the  name,  having  been  fully  treated  of  in  the 
First  Volume  of  this  System,  page  193,  and  the  40th,  and  following  pages  of  this 
Appendix,  without  resuming  any  thing  of  what  is  there  said,  we  shall  directly 
proceed  to  the  branch  of  that  noble  family  we  are  now  to  treat  of. 

The  families  of  Polmaise  and  Drumquhassell  are  lineally  descended  from  Sir 
Robert  de  Ciininghame,  Lord  of  Kilmaurs,  the  tenth  in  the  course  of  succession  of  that 
noble  family,  who  was  cotemporary  with  King  Robert  Bruce,  and  a  strenuous 
asserter  of  his  right;  and,  in  consideration  of  his  services,  in  aiino  1319,  he  got  a 
charter  from  that  prince  of  the  lands  of  Lambrughton  in  the  shire  of  Ayr  (a).  He 
left  behind  him  two  sons.  Sir  William,  who  succeeded  him  in  his  honours  and 
estate,  and  Sir  Andrew  Cunningham. 

I.  This  Sir  Andrew  Cunningham  of  Polmaise  and  Auchinbowie  was  cotempo- 
rary with  King  David  II.  and  shared  in  the  favours  of  that  prince,  from  whom  he 
got  a  grant  of  the  lands  of  Pitkelendy,  &c.  and  was  founder  of  the  foresaid  fami- 
lies of  Polmaise  and  Drumquhassell,  in  the  shire  of  Stirling  (^). 

II.  Alexander  Cunningham  of  Drumquhassell  married Home,  daugh- 
ter of  John  Home  of  Ersilton  and  Cowdenknows,  ancestor  to  the  present  Earl  of 
Home,  by  whom  he  had  a  son,  Andrew. 

III.  Andrew  Cunningham  of  Drumquhassell  married  a  daughter  of  Sir  Walter 
Stewart  of  Morphy,  sister  to  Alexander  Lord  Evandale,  ancestor  to  the  Lords  of 
Ochiltree,  now  extinct,  and  to  the  present  Earl  of  Murray,  by  whom  he  had  issue 
Alexander,  his  heir,  and  a  daughter,  Egidia,  or  Giles,  married  to  Thomas  Buchanan 
of  Gartincaber,  brother-german  to  Walter  Buchanan  of  that  Ilk. 

IV.  Alexander  Cunningham  of  Drumquhassell  married  Margaret,  one  of  the 
three  daughters  and  co-heirs  of  William  Park  of  that  Ilk,  an  ancient  family  in  the 
shire  of  Renfrew,  by  Margaret  his  wife,  daughter  and  heir  of  Sir  Walter  Stewart 
of  Arthurly  (c)  ;  by  which  marriage  he  very  much  enlarged  his  estate ;  for,  besides 
that  share  of  it  w^hich  fell  to  him  in  right  of  his  wife,  by  transacting  with  her 
sisters  and  their  husbands,  he  became  proprietor  of  all,  or  far  the  greatest  part  of 
the  estate  of  Park  {d),  and  by  the  lady  he  had  issue, 

V.  Andrew  who  succeeded  him  in  his  estate,  which  at  the  time  having  become 
very  opulent,  procured  him  a  noble  alliance  by  his  marriage  with  Mary,  daughter 
to  Robert  Lord  Erskine,  ancestor  to  the  present  Earl  of  Marr  fej,  and  Elizabeth 
his  wtfe,  daughter  of  Sir  George  Campbell  of  Loudon,  by  whom  he  had  issue, 
John,  his  successor,  and  Janet,  married  to  Walter  Buchanan  of  Drumakill,  ances- 
tor of  Mr  William  Buchanan  late  of  Craigievairn,  from  whom  several  families  of 
that  name  are  descended. 

VI.  John  Cunningham  of  Drumquhassell  appeared  early  in  the  interest  of  the 
Reformation,  and  of  those  who  espoused  the  interest  of  King  James  VI.  in  his 
minority,  in  opposition  to  his  mother  CKieen  Mary,  which  ingratiated  liim  so  far 
with  the  Earl  of  Lennox,  when  Regent,  that  he  did  nothing  of  importance  without 
his  advice  ;  and  this  confidence  reposed  in  him  by  the  regent  procured  him  to  be 
called  his  Right  hand,  and  advanced  him  to  the  honour  of  being  Master  of  tlie 
Household  to  the  young  king  when  at  Stirling,  under  the  regency  of  the  Earl  of 
Marr  :  But,  upon  the  king's  assuming  the  government  in  his  own  hands,  being 
offended  at  the  conduct  of  the  Earl  of  Arran  his  favourite,  he  joined  those  who  at- 


(fl)  Charta  in  Rotulis  Robert  I.  Appendix,  p.  40.  (.b)  Rotula  Britanuis.  (c)  This  is  instructed  by 
several  writings  in  Bandalloch's  custody,  relating  to  the  Parks  of  that  Ilk.  (</)  Charter  Elizabeth  Park 
and  her  husband  to  Dtumqahassell,  of  her  part  of  the  lands  of  Park,  and  procuratory  of  resignation  by 
Margaret  Park,  for  resigning  her  part  of  the  said  lands  in  favour  of  Drumquhassell.  (f)  Charter  in  the 
legister  of  the  Privy  Seal,  in  the  year  1549. 


APPENDIX.  1.^ 

tempted  tUc  Raid  at  Ruthven,  in  the  15S2  (/),  with  design  to  seize  the  king's 
person,  and  procure  the  return  of  the  banished  lords;  and  upon  trial,  being  con- 
victed, he  and  Malcolm  Doa^las  of  Mains,  hi&  son-in-law,  suffered  death  on  that 
account,  at  the  market-cross  of  Edinburgh,  in  the  year  1584  {g).  He  married 
Janet,  eldest  daughter,  and  one  of  the  co-heirs  of  James  Cunningham  of  Polmaise, 
from  which  family  he  was  descended,  and  by  that  marriage  bLcame  the  repre- 
sentative of,  as  he  was  before  the  heir-male,  and  had  issue,  John,  who  succeeded 
liim,  and  Robert  Cunningham  of  Trimbeg,  ancestor  to  Bandalloch,  and  two 
daughters,  Janet,  married  to  Malcolm  Douglas  of  Mains,  of  whom  descended  the 
Douglasses  of  Blackerston  in  the  Merse,  and  Sir  Robert  Douglas  of  Spot,  created 
Viscount  of  Belhaven  1633,  who  has  a  stately  monument  of  marble  erected  over 
him  in  the  abbey-church  of  Holyroodhouse.  Mary,  the  second  daughter,  was  mar- 
ried to  Peter  Napier  of  Kilmahcw,  of  whom  several  ikmilies  in  Dumbartonshire  are 
descended. 

VII.  John  Cunningham  of  Drumquhassell  was  reponed  against  his  father's  for- 
feiture, and  restored  to  his  estate  upon  the  general  act  of  mdemnity  1585.  He 
married  Margaret  Elphinstone,  daughter  of  Robert  Loixi  Elphinstone,  and  sister 
to  Alexander  Lord  Elphinstone,  Lord  High  Treasurer  of  Scotland,  in  the  reign  of 
King  James  VI.  and  James  Lord  Balmerino,  Secretary  of  State,  and  President  of 
the  Session  in  the  same  reign,  by  whom  he  had  John,  his  heir,  and  Mr  James 
Cunningham,  writer  to  the  signet,  who  was  writer  to  King  Charles  II.,  a  Latin  poet 
•and  antiquary,  the  verses  prefixed  to  our  acts  of  Parliament  were  compos- 
ed by  him,  and  author  of  the  inscription  upon  Macduff's  cross  in  the  shire  of 
Fife. 

John  Cunningham  of  Drumquhassell  died  without  any  surviving  heirs,  and -the 
lieirs  of  Mr  James  Cunningham,  his  uncle,  being  also  extinct,  the  representation  of 
the  family  devolved  upon  the  heir-male,  descended  of  Robert  Cunningham  of 
Trimbeg  before  mentioned. 

Which  Robert  Cunningham  of  Trimbeg  purchased  these  lands  from  Sir  John 
Haldane  of  Gleneagles  in  the  year  1616  {h),  and  married  Elspeth,  daughter 
of  William  Buchanan  of  Portnellan  and  Ross  (/),  by  whom  he  had  John,  his  eldest 
son,  and  William. 

John  Cunningh.\m  of  Trimbeg  was  served  heir  to  his  father  before  the  Sheriff 
of  StirUng,  31st  July  1630;  but  dying  without  issue,  was  succeeded  by  his  bro- 
ther (k), 

William,  who  was  served  heir  to  him  in  the  1644.  He  married  Alice,  daughter 
of  John  Buchanan  of  Arnprior,  heir  of  line  of  the  family  of  Buchanan,  by  whom 
he  had 

John  Cunningham,  Writer  to  the  Signet,  who  was  a  gentleman  of  great  know- 
ledge and  capacity  in  his  business,  which  he  prosecuted  with  success.  He  acquired 
the  estate  of  Bandalloch,  and  married  Jean,  daughter  of  William.  Weir,  descended 
of  the  ancient  family  of  Weir  of  Blackwood  in  Lanarkshire,  by  whom  he  had 
William,  his  successor,  now  of  Bandalloch  ;  John  Cunningham,  writer  to  the 
signet,  who  purchased  the  lands  of  Balbugy  in  Fife ;  Robert  Cunningham,  mer- 
chant in  Edinburgh,  who  purchased  the  lands  of  Banton  ;  George  Cunningham, 
surgeon  in  Edinburgh,  sometime  Deacon  of  that  Incorporation,  and  Conveener  of 
the  Trades  in  Edinburgh ;  James  Cunningham,  merchant  in  Amsterdam  ;  and 
David,  now  of  Seabegs,  Major  in  Stirling  Castle. 

William  Cunningham,  now  of  Bandalloch,  married  Martha,  daughter  of  Sir 
George  Suttie  of  Balgone,  baronet,  in  the  shire  of  Haddington,  by  whom  he  has 
George  his  only  son,  apparent  heir,  now  in  life. 

William  Cunningham  of  Bandalloch,  for  his  achievement  and  ensign-armorial, 
bears  argent,  a  shake-fork  sable,  betwixt  three  roses .^///cj-,  above  the  shield  his 
helmet  befitting  his  degree  ;  for  his  crest,  issuing  out  of  the  torse  of  wreath  of  his 


(/")  Melville's  Memoirs:      (^)  Bishop  Spottiswood's  History.      (A  Charter  !n  Eandalloch's  custody.. 
(!)  Ibidem,     (i)  Rewjr,  ibid. 

Vol.  II.  7  L 


it;o  APPENDIX. 

colours,  a  trunk  of  an  oak  tree,  with  a  sprig  vert :  The  motto,  on  an  escrol  above, 
Tande?/t. 


Addition  to  the  Memorial  of  tbe  fa??ii!y  of  Dvntkeath,  in  this  appendix, 
page  155. 


The  family  ever  still,  and  at  all  times  since  the  Reformation,  zealous  for  the 
Protestant  religion,  and  the  presbyterian  discipline  and  government  in  the  church. 
In  the  minority  of  King  James  VI.  Sir  James  Edmonstone  of  Duntreath  was  a 
zealous  man  of  the  party  of  the  lords  who  seized  the  young  king  at  Ruthven  in 
T582,  and  who  removed  those  they  called  evil  counsellors  from  the  throne,  who 
were  raising  the  prerogative  of  the  crown  higher  than  the  legal  constitution  could 
bear,  and  bringing  in  bishops  into  the  church,  an  office  they  declared  strongly 
against,  as  inconsistent  with  the  purity  of  reformation,  and  the  parity  among  the 
clergy  they  had  reformed  upon. 

Archibald  Edmonstone  of  Duntreath,  because  of  his  known  principles,  being 
a  zealous  presbyterian,  was  chosen  Commissioner  to  the  Parliament  1633,  for  the 
shire  of  StirHng,  wherein  he  opposed  with  great  zeal  the  act  anent  the  prerogative, 
the  king's  appointing  the  apparel  of  churchmen,  as  that  which  might  introduce 
into  the  church  every  thing  according  to  the  English  pattern  ;  a  model  and  uni- 
formity in  divine  worship,  King  Charles  I.  had  his  heart  so  much  set  to  be  the 
same  in  all  his  dominions.  The  king  was  so  zealous  to  have  the  act  earned,  that 
he  marked  with  his  own  pen  those  who  voted  for  or  against  the  act. 

Archibald  Edmonstone,  the  last  Duntreath,  was  also  of  his  father's  principles 
as  a  presbyterian,  and  for  the  liberty  of  his  country,  which,  generally  speaking, 
go  together.  He  was  a  great  and  a  constant  supporter  and  countenancer  of  those 
of  the  presbyterian  clergy,  who  came  over  to  the  north  of  Ireland,  after  the  set- 
ting up  of  episcopacy  in  the  1661,  that  they  were  turned  out  of  their  churches, 
for  not  submitting  to  the  new  bishops,  and  receiving  institution  and  collation  from 
them,  who,  for  twenty  years  before,  had  been  preaching  against  the  unlawfulness 
of  episcopacy,  or  any  superiority  in  the  office-bearers  in  the  church,  whom  the 
other  party  could  not  look  on,  otherwise  than  as  time-servers,  and  men  of  no  prin- 
ciples. Under  all  the  discouragements  and  hardships  the  presbyterians  were  ex- 
posed to,  the  Laird  of  Duntreath  stuck  firm  to  his  party,  though,  as  a  prudent  wise 
man,  he  took  care  to  live  with  that  caution  and  circumspection,  that  no  advantage, 
nor  handle,  could  be  taken  against  him  :  But,  for  all  that,  his  known  principles  were 
crime  enough  with  those  who  had  the  chief  direction  of  aftairs  in  Scotland,  and 
they  wanted  but  the  slightest  occasion  to  harass  and  persecute  him,  so  as  they 
could  found  a  prosecution  upon,  and  bring  him  on  the  stage  as  a  confessor,  for  ad- 
hering to  his  principles  as  a  presbyterian.  For  a  long  while  all  their  arts  failed  ; 
and  though  they  had  their  httle  mercenary  tools  at  work,  to  see  if  they  could 
prove  that  he  had  been  at  conventicles,  as  preaching  by  the  presbyterian  outed 
ministers  in  the  field  was  termed,  or  that  any  had  been  held  on  his  estate,  or  on 
his  ground  :  But  all  failed,  till  a  meeting  of  that  kind  was,  without  his  knowledge, 
held  in  an  old  gallery  at  his  house  of  Duntreath.  He  could  not  think  on  disper- 
sing them,  or  informing  those,  whose  work  it  was  to  scatter  those  meetings,  which 
came,  in  the  eye  of  the  law,  to  be  called  rendevouzes  of  rebellion ;  so  now  they 
thought  they  had  matter  enough  against  him,  if  not  to  take  away  his  fife,  yet  to 
fine  him  deeply,  which  was  what  his  enemies  had  always  mostly  in  view.  The 
great  trouble  and  the  vexatious  prosecution  this  worthy  gentleman  met  with  upon 
this  incident,  of  no  great  consequence  in  itself,  one  would  think,  cannot  be  so  well 
expressed,  or  more  copiously  set  forth,  than  in  a  relation  of  it  transmitted  to  me  by 
Archibald  Edmonstone  of  Duntreath,  the  gentleman's  own  son,  and  the  heir  of 
2. 


APPENDIX.  291 

[he  family  at  this  time.     So  without  altering  any  thing  in  the  stile,  or  adding  to  or 
diminishing  from  it,  the  relation  here  follows. 

That,  in  the  year  1677,  '^^e  late  Archibald  Edmonstone  of  Duntioath,  being 
then  at  Duntreath  on  his  private  affairs,  the  minister,  called  Mr  Fonester,  former- 
ly in  the  parish  of  Killearn,  came  to  Duntreath,  without  Duntreath's  knowledge, 
and  had  a  private  lecture  in  the  gallery  there,  probably  by  the  invitation  of  some 
private  Christians,  which,  when  Duntreath  heard  of,  he  thought  it  no  great  crime 
to  be  a  hearer ;  on  this  egregious  fault,  only  esteemed  so  by  the  prevaihng  party 
of  the  time,  he  was  informed  against  by  one  Craig  of  Ledrogrean,  to  my  Lord 
Ross,  who  then  commanded  a  troop  of  dragoons  :  On  this  the  said  troop  was  sent 
to  apprehend  Duntreath,  not  suspecting  any  such  treatment,  and,  apprehending 
him,  took  him  straight  to  Glasgow,  where  he  lay  a  night  in  the  court  of  guard, 
ufterwai-ds  three  nights  in  the  tolbooth,  and  gave  in  his  bond  of  a  L.  loco  Ster- 
ling to  General  Dalyell,  to  appear  at  Edinbugh  a  month  after  that;  which  accord- 
ingly he  did,  and  continued  six  months  in  the  tolbooth,  in  which  time  he  was  call- 
ed three  times  before  the  council,  but  was  not  allowed  any  advocate  or  lawyer  to 
.ippear  or  plead  for  him  ;  only  Sir  George  Lockhart  came  into  the  tolbooth  and  ad- 
vised Duntreath  what  to  say  before  the  council,  who  put  some  questions  to  him, 
relating  to  the  king's  lawful  title  to  the  crown,  and  the  Archbishop  of  St  Andrews' 
murder  ;  his  answers  were  pretty  general,  and  desired  to  be  excused  on  that  sub- 
ject, seeing  he  did  not  think  himself  obliged  to  declare  in  his  private  capacity :  Then 
tliey  asked  him  about  the  lecture  in  Duntreatli's  house  for  which  he  was  appre- 
hended, how  he  came  to  be  present  at  it  ;  his  answer  was,  that  meeting  was  with- 
out his  knowledge  or  invitation  ;  in  short,  they  could  lay  so  little  to  his  charge, 
that  they  could  not  be  so  cruel  as  to  take  his  life,  but  fined  him  in  L.  500  Sterling, 
the  one-hah'  to  the  informer,  and  the  other  half  to  the  crown.  This,  though  a 
brief  account  of  that  tragical  affair,  yet,  as  it  is  really  matter  of  fact,  so  deserves 
some  room  in  the  particular  history  of  the  late  Duntreath,  and  genealogy  ot  the 
family.  There  is  fmther  to  be  added  of  the  same  gentleman,  that  when  he  was  not 
longat  rest  from  the  troubles  above  mentioned,  thelrish  rebellion  broke  out  in  Ireland 
in  the  year  16S8,  Duntreath  appeared  very  early  to  show  his  zeal  f)r  the  Protestant 
interests  and  liberties  of  the  people  ;  he  first  raised  an  independent  company  of  his 
tenants  and  neighbours,  and,  as  far  as  was  in  his  power,  defended  the  country 
from  the  insults  of  the  Irish,  particularly  those  that  were  in  garrison  in  Carrickfer- 
gus ;  he  was  afterwards  commanded  by  General  Gustavus  Hamilton  to  march  his 
company  towards  Coleraine,  where  he  met  with  a  regiment  formerly  raised  by  Sir 
Robert  Adair,  (who  went  to  Scotland  after  raising  said  regiment)  on  which  va- 
cancy Duntreath  got  the  command  of  that  regiment;  he  continued  some  time  in 
garrison  in  Coleraine,  and  he  and  his  men  were  among  the  first  who  fired  at  the  Irish 
that  were  near  the  town  :  On  that  the  Irish  retreated  ;  after  that  he  was  command- 
ed to  cut  the  wooden  bridge  of  Portglenoon,  and  cast  up  a  trench  to  prevent  the 
Irish  coming  down  the  Bann  water.  In  the  defending  of  that  trench  to  the  knees 
in  water,  in  a  rainy  season,  he  contracted  a  most  violent  cold,  v.'hich  was  after- 
wards the  occasion  of  his  death.  He  was  commanded  to  march  his  regiment  to 
Derry,  that  was  besieged  by  the  Irish  ;  but  they  being  so  scarce  of  provisions, 
could  not  admit  of  his  men,  and  he  could  not  leave  them  ;  on  which  he  marched 
four  miles  below  Derry,  to  a  fort  called  Culmore.  When  he  died,  he  desired  his 
corps  might  be  taken  over  to  the  ancient  burial-place  of  his  family  in  Strathblane- 
church  in  Scotland,  which  was  accordingly  done. 


Of  the  family  of  GARTHSHORE  of  that  Ilk,  in  Dumbartonshire. 


THIS  family,  as  other  ancient  families  in  Scotland,  have  taken  their  surname 
from  their  estate,  and  the  lands  they  have  long  enjoyed. 


292 


APPENDIX. 


That  this  family  of  Garthshore  of  that  Ilk  is  very  ancient,  is  well  instructed  . 
they  have,  amongst  the  writs  of  the  family,  charters  of  their  lands  and  estate  of 
Garthshore,  as  far  back  as  the  reign  of  King  Alexander  II.  who  came  to  the  throne 
in  the  year  12 14. 

This  family  has  intermarried  with  several  of  the  best  families  in  the  west,  such 
as  Houston  of  that  Ilk,  Muirhead  of  Lauchop,  &.c.  and  did  enjoy  their  ancient 
estate  of  Garthshore  from  the  above  period,  downward  in  a  hneal  order  of  suc- 
cession, to  about  the  end  of  the  reign  of  King  Charles  I.  when,  on  the  death  of 
Captain  Patrick  Garthshore  of  that  Ilk  (who  was  reckoned  a  gentleman  of  honour 
and  a  brave  soldier)  without  issue,  the  succession  devolved  on  his  immediate 
younger  brother,  Dr  James  Garthshore,  Doctor  of  Divinity,  and  Parson  of  Car- 
dross. 

The  Doctor,  as  heir  of  his  brother,  possessed  the  estate  for  some  years  :  But,  as 
it  was  affected  by  a  liferent  to  his  brother's  lady,  and  incumbered  with  debts  con- 
tracted by  his  brother  while  in  the  army,  he,  for  payment  of  those  debts,  made 
over  the  estate  to  his  youngest  brother,  Alexander  Garthshore,  who  was  bred  a 
merchant,  and  whose  heirs  still  enjoy  the  estate. 

Doctor  Garthshore,  the  undoubted  representative  of  this  family,  died,  leav- 
ing three  sons,  Lieutenant  William,  Mr  James,  and  George  Garthshores. 

Lieutenant  William,  the  eldest,  died  leaving  one  son,  William,  who  was  bred  a 
chirurgeon,  and  died  some  years  ago  in  the  West  Indies,  and  was  never  married  : 
So  that,  since  his  demise,  the  Doctor's  second  son, 

Mr  James  Garthshore,  Minister  at  Carmichael,  is  the  undoubted  representative 
of  this  family. 

The  above  Mr  James  Garthshore  has  one  son, 

James  Garthshore,  Writer  to  the  Signet,  who  married  Mrs  Jean  Scott,  daughter 
of  Sir  Patrick  Scott  of  Ancrum,  by  whom  he  has  one  son,  James.  The  arms  or 
coat-armorial  of  the  family  is  argent,  a  saltier  betwixt  four  holly  leaves  vert ; 
crest,  an  eagle  proper :  motto,  I  renew  my  age. 


Of  the  SHAWS  of  Hayley  and  Sornbeg. 


THE  original  of  the  surname  of  Shaw  is  commonly  attributed  to  one  Shaw,  se- 
cond son  to  Duncan  Earl  of  Fife,  who  was  cup-bearer  to  one  of  our  kings,  Alex- 
ander n.  or  Alexander  III.  as  others  assert,  and  whose  descendants  assumed  their 
surname  from  his  proper  name,  and  their  armorial  bearings  from  the  badge  of  his 
office.  But  without  nicely  inquiring  to  which  of  these  princes  the  forenamed  Shaw 
was  Cup-bearer,  it  is  certain,  that  soon  after  the  period  of  time  condescended  on, 
there  appeared  several  families  of  that  surname  in  the  west  first,  then  in  the  north, 
and  afterwards  in  England  and  Ireland. 

Those  in  the  west  took  their  first  designation  from  their  lands  of  Hayley,  in 
the  shire  of  Ayr,  which  they  held  of  the  Great  Stewards  of  Scotland  ;  and  the  first 
of  them  we  find  upon  record  is  William  Shaw,  who  is  witness  to  a  charter  granted 
by  Jacobus  Senescallus  Scotiae,  to  the  monastery  of  Paisley,  in  the  1291  ;  and  the 
said  James,  Great  Steward  of  Scotland,  likewise  granted  a  charter,  (which  is  still 
extant  in  the  custody  of  Alexander  Shaw,  writer  in  Edinburgh,  second  son  to 
Sornbeg)  Willielmo  dicto  del  Shaw,  pro  homagio  il  servitio  suo,  of  the  lands  of  Hay- 
ley, Wardlaw,  and  Drumchaber,  in  the  shire  of  Ayr.  The  date  of  this  charter 
cannot  be  ascertained,  but  it  must  have  been  before  the  1309,  in  which  year  the 
granter  died. 

The  next  of  this  family  we  meet  with  on  record  is  John  of  Shaw,  Lord  of  the 
Hayley,  who,  in  anno  1407,  entered  into  an  indenture  with  Sir  Allan  of  Cathcart, 


APPENDIX. 


293 


Lord  of" that  Ilk,  anent  the  wadset  of  some  lands,  which  was  afterwards  confirmed 
under  the  Gfeac  Seal  (■,). 

John  Shavv  of  Hayley,  in  the  year  1469,  was  joined  in  a  commission  of  embassy 
to  Denmark,  with  the  Lord  Evaiidale,  Lord  Chancellor,  the  Earls  of  Arran  and 
Orkney,  and  several  other  persons  of  rank  and  distinction,  to  treat  of  a  marriage 
betwixt  King  James  III.  and  Margaret,  daughter  of  Christiern  III.  King  of  Den- 
mark; and  then-negociation  had  the  desired  success  (d). 

Andrew  Shaw  of  Sornbeg,  son  to  H.iyley,  w.is  mteft,  under  the  Great  Seal, 
in  the  lands  of  Sornbeg,  Polkemmet,  Whitburn,  and  other  lands  in  the  shires  of  Ayr 
and  Linlithgow,  &.C.  2i5t  May  1447,  and  was  succeeded  by  his  son 

Alexahde*  Shaw  of  Sornbeg  and  Polkemmet,  who  resigned  the  lands  of  Pol- 
kemmet in  favour  of  Sir  Robert  Hamilton  of  Preston  ;  upon  which  resignation  a 
cliarter  under  the  Great  Seal  was  granted  in  anno  i486  (c),  and  was  succeeded  by 
his  son 

William,  the  other  heirs-male  of  the  family  of  Hayley  failing,  the  family  of 
Sornbeg  or  Polkemmet  remained  the  only  heirs-male  and  representatives  of  the  fa- 
mily of  Hayley  ;  and  the  aforesaid  Wdham  Shaw  of  Sornbeg  and  Polkemmet,  son 
to  the  foresaid  Alexander,  was  infeft,  under  the  Great  Seal,  in  the  lands  of  Pol- 
kemmet and  Sornbeg,  Si-c.  in  the  said  shires,  14th  March  1486,  and  in  the  lands  of 
Fl.jck  and  Elockside,  in  the  shire  of  Renfrew,  20th  April  1467,  and  was  succeeded 
by  lus  son 

John  Shaw  of  Sornbeg,  who  was  infeft,  under  the  Great  Seal,  in  the  said  lands  of 
Flock,  &.C.  28th  May  1529.     He  was  succeeded  by  his  son 

Andrew  Shaw  of  Sornbeg,  who  was  sewed  and  retoured  heir,  in  special,  to 
William  Sliaw  of  Sornbeg  and  Polkeaimet,  his  grandfather,  in  the  five-pound  land, 
of  old  extent,  of  Heliugton  ;  five-pound  land,  of  old  extent,  of  Knockindale  ;  fifty- 
shilling  land,  of  old  extent,  of  Goldring  ;  the  lands,  barony,  and  fortalice  of  Sorn- 
beg, and  others,  in  the   shire  of  Ayr,   loth   December  1547. In  anno  1544  he 

and  John  Shaw,  his  son  and  apparent  heir,  granted  a  charter  of  the  lands  of  He- 
lington  I'Viliieimo  Will.-we,  nepotl  et  baredi  quonda?n  Hlllielmi  IVallace  de  Ellersly  (cl), 

in  ^nno  1545. ^David  Hamilton  of  Preston  obtained  a  gift  of  non-entry  of  the 

lands  of  Polkemmet,  Sornbeg,  and  Foulshiels,  &c.  in  the  shires  of  Ayr  and  Lin- 
lithgow, from  Queen  Mary,  which  had  fallen  into  her  hands  by  reason  of  non-entry 
from  the  decease  of  the  above  William  Shaw  of  Polkemmet ;  whereupon  he  ob- 
tained decreet  of  declarator  before  the  Lords  of  Session,  in  the  1549,  against  the 
said  Andrew  Shaw  of  Sornbeg  ;  but  the  said  gift  being,  as  it  would  appear,  only  a 
trust  for  the  behoof  of  the  said  Andrew,  the  nearest  heir,  he  previously  made  over 
the  same  to  him,  with  a  decreet  of  apprising  for  the  bygone  non-entry  duties ; 
upon  which  the  said  Andrew  obtained  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal  in  favour  of 
himself,  and  the  said  John  Shaw  his  son,  4th  March  1550  (c);  whereupon  they 
were  infeft,  and  the  lands  of  Polkemmet,  &-c.  thereby  were  united  to  the  estate 

of  Sornbeg. Upon  the  19th  June  1589  ffj,   the  said  Andrew  Shaw  was  infeft 

in  the  foresaid  lands  of  Flockside,  upon  a  precept  forth  of  the  Chancellary,  as  heir 
to  his  father  John  ;  and,  upon  the  2d  March  1590  (  ^)  he  obtained  a  charter-  from 
Queen  Mary  in  favou-r  of  himself  and  his  said  son,  o:  the  lands  of  Sornbeg,  and 
others  :  and  28th  April  1550,  the  said  John  was  married  to  Helen  Wallace,  daugh- 
ter to  Carnel,  as  appears  by  the  original  contract  of  marrage  of  that  date ;  in  all 
which  land,  the  said  An,drew  was  succeeded  by  the  said 

John  Shaw  of  Sornbeg  or  Polkemmet,  his  son,  who  was  succeeded  by 

John  Shaw  of  Sornbeg,  his  son,  in  the  1592  ;  he  is  infeft  upon  a  precept  forth  of 
the  Chancellary,  as  heir  to  Andrew  Siiaw,  his  grandfather,  m  the  foresaid  land  of 
Sornbeg.  Helington,  Knockindale,  Goldring,  &c.  ('>).  And,  upon  the  28th  Oc- 
tober 1608,  he  was  infeft  in  the  lands  of  Polkemmet,  &c.  upon  another  precept 
issued  out  of  the  Chancellary  in  his  f  ivour  as  heir  to  John  Shaw  of  Polkemmet, 
his  father  (•) ;  and,  in  finno  1615,  upon  his  own  resignation,  he  obtained  a  char- 
ter from   King  James  Vi.  erecting   the   haill  lands  into   the   barony  of  Sornbeg, 

(fl)  Charta  in  publicis  archivis.  {/?)  Buchanan,  and  Torfaus's  History  of  Denaiark,  p.  191.  (c)  Char- 
ts in  publicis  archivis.  (•/)  Caarta  ibijcii.  (<•)  Charta  penes  Comitem  de  Duiidonald.  (/)  CharU  ia, 
publicis  archivis.     (^3  Ibidem,     (_b)  loidem.     {^i)  Charta  in  publicis  archivis. 

Vol.  II.  7  M 


294 


APPENDIX. 


whereupon  he  was  infeft  {k) ;  and,  in  1620,  he  granted  a  charter  to  his  son  Patrick 
at  his  marriage,  of  the  foresaid  lands  of  Polkemmet. 

And  the  said  Patrick.  Shaw  of  Sornbeg,  as  heir  served  in  special  to  the  foresaid 
John  Shaw  his  father,  25th  August  1631,  was  also  infeft  in  the  foresaid  lands  of 
Sornbeg,  Chapleton,  Duncanrigs,  Goldnng,  Stc.  which  he  rc-igned  in  favour  of 
John  his  son,  and  John  his  grandson,  who  were  infeft   under  the  Great  Seal  anno 

1699  (/).      He,  the   said   Patrick,  married  Duiham,   daughter  of 

Durham  of  Duntervie,  by  whom  he  had  the  said 

John  Shaw  of  Sornbeg,  his  son,  who,  i-/nno  1651,  married  Isabel  Boswell,  se- 
cond and  one  of  the  four  daughters  of  David  Boswell  of  Auchmleck,  by  whom  he 
had 

John  Shaw  of  Sornbeg,  who  married  Marion  Kennedy,  daughter  to  Kennedy  of 
Kilhenzie,  by  whom  he  had 

Captain  John  Shav;  of  the  Scots  Royal  Regiment  of  Foot,  his  eldest  son  and 
heir,  now  with  that  corps  in  the  expedition  in  America,  serving  his  country,  who 
was  served  heir  in  special  to  his  said  father  and  grandfather  in  the  foresaid  lands, 
anno  1720. — Alexander  Shaw,  writer  in  Edinburgh  ;  two  daughters,  Anne,  mar- 
ried to  Graham  of  Drynie  ;  and  Catharine,  married  to  Mackenzie  of  Suddie, 
both  which  gentlemen  reside  in  the  shire  of  Ross. 

The  armorial  achievement  of  the  family  of  Shaw  of  Sornbeg  is,  azure,  three 
mullets  in  fesse,  betwixt  as  many  covered  cups  argent ;  crest,  a  dexter  hand  pro- 
per, holding  a  covered  cup,  argent :  motto,  /  mean  well.     N.  R. 

It  may  not  be  improper  here  to  observe,  that  the  author  of  the  Historical 
Remarks  on  Ragman's  Roll  has  committed  a  mistake,  in  supposing  the 
family  of  Sauchie  to  succeed  as  heirs  to  that  of  Hayley,  with  whom  they 
had  no  manner  of  connection  ;  and  he  had  no  reason  to  form  this  sup- 
position: The  only  information  he  had  concerning  the  family  of  Hayley, 
being  from  that  of  Sornbeg,  who  communicated  to  him  the  original  char- 
ter granted  by  James,  Great  Steward  of  Scotland,  to  that  family,  as  him- 
f^elf  ingenuously  acknowledges. 


Memorial  of  the  ancient  Family  of  Riddell  of  that  Ilk,  Baronet ;  showing  their 
Antiquity,  Descent,  and  Alliances,  jrom  the  Reign  of  King  David  I.  to  the  pre- 


IT  is  the  received  opinion  among  the  modem  antiquaries,  that  the  surname  and 
family  of  Riddell  or  Rydal  is  derived  from  one  of  those  Normans  that  came  over 
to  England  with  William  the  Conqueror  («)  ;  and,  by  the  the  gift  of  that  prince, 
got  many  great  and  considerable  estates  and  lordships  in  that  realm.  The  surname 
seems  to' be  local  to  Riddell,  which  denotes  its  antiquity. 

Geoffrey  Riddle,  in  the  seventh  of  King  Henry  I.  of  England,  being,  says  a 
great  and  learned  antiquary  and  historian  (;/),  ^.n  eminent  and  learned  person,  up- 
on that  great  controversy  then  happening  betwixt  Osbert,  at  that  time  sheriff  of 
Yorkshire,  and  the  church  of  St  Wilfred  at  Rippon,  touching  the  privilege  of  sanc- 
tuary there,  whereof  the  sheriff  would  not  allow,  was,  by  special  commission,  em- 
ployed together  with  Robert  Bishop  of  Lincoln,  Ralph  Basset,  Roger  de  Mescbines, 
and  Peter  de  Valoines,  to  hear  and  determine  therein,  who  gave  judgment  for  the 
church  ;  and,  not  long  after  this,  growing  famous  for  his  knowledge  in  the  laws,. 


(*)   Charta  in  publicis  archivis.      (/)   Ibidem.       [m)  Inquiry  i 
William  Dugdale's  Baronage  of  England,  torn.  i.  page  1$^, 


into  the  Origin  of  Surnames.      («)  SI.- 


APPENDIX.  295 

.was  soon  thereafter  constituted  Great  Justice  of  England.  But,  in  the  cicth  of 
that  reign,  upon  the  return  of  King  Ilenry  out  of  Normandy,  where  Prince  VVil- 
hain,  his  eldest  son,  had,  says  my  learned  author,  "  ni  testimony  of  the  people's 
"  obedience,  received  their  homage  and  fealty  by  his  father's  appointment,  being 
"  in  the  ship  with  the  prince,  and  other  of  the  king's  children,  and  diverse  of  the 
*'  nobility,  they  were  cast  away  at  sea  and  perished  ( .)),  anno  1 120  (9)."  He  left  issue 
by  Geva  his  wife,  daughter  of  Hugh  the  first  Earl  of  Chester  ().  one  sole  daugh 
ter  his  heir,  named  Maud,  married  to  Richard  Basset,  son  of  Ralph  Basset, 
Justice  of  England  ;  which  Richard,  being  also  Justice  of  England,  had  by  her, 
two  sons,  Geoffrey,  who  assumed  the  surname  of  Rydal,  of  whom  the  English 
barons  Rydal  descended,  who  are  traced  down,  in  the  baronage  of  England,  by 
Sir  William  Dugdale,  to  which  I  must  refer. 

But  though  the  fiht  of  the  name  came  over  to  England  with  the  Duke  of  Nor- 
mandy, yet  it  was  not  long  after  that  the  Riddells  came  to  Scotland ;  for,  in  the 
reign  of  our  King  Alexander  I.  when  David,  that  king's  brother,  was  Princeps 
Cumbria,  he  caused  an  inqiilsitio,  an  inquiry,  to  be  made  "  de  possessionibus  ecclesia; 
*'  Glasguensis  auxilioetinvestigatione  seniorum  hotninumetsapientiorum  totius  Cum- 
bria." To  this  deed  of  inquisition  tlicre  are  many  great  witnesses ;  and,  among  others, 
Gervasius  Riddell,  Hugo  de  Morvih,  Walterus  de  Lindeseyia,  &c.  Sic.  (1).  1  am  of 
opinion,  that  this  Prince  David,  in  the  lifetime  of  his  brother,  and  while  he  was 
prince,  or  Conies  Cuinbrice,  as  he  is  sometimes  called,  having  got  acquaintance  with 
the  sons  of  some  of  the  Norman  gentlemen,  who  had  shared  in  the  conquest  of 
England,  gave  them  possessions,  and  settled  them  in  estates  in  Cumberland ;  and 
when  he  came  to  the  crown  of  Scotland,  by  the  name  of  David  1.  anno  1122,  he 
conferred  other  estates,  and  offices  on  them:  >"or  we  find  the  same  Gervasius  Rid- 
dell  is  witness  to  several  cnarters  by  this  King  David;  particularly  to  one  granted 
to  the  Prior  of  Coldinghani,  wherein  Le  is  designed  Gervasius  I'icecomes  de  Rox- 
burgh (t).  It  cannot  oe  a  question,  but  t.\\2X  Walterus  de  Riddell  is  the  son  and 
successor  of  Gerva.''ius  tie  Riddel/,  who  is,  for  a  great  while,  an  ordinary  witness  in 
King  David's  charter^  («).  There  is  a  charter  by  that  king  to  himself,  "  Waltero 
"  Riddel  de  terris  de  Lilisclve  &■  dimidium  de  Escheco  &-  Wittune  (x),  per  suas 
"  rectas  divisas  tenend.  &  habend.  sibi  &-  hseredibus  suis  de  nie  &-  haeredibus  meis, 
"  in  feoda  'if-  h^reditate,  per  servitium  unius  miJitis,  sicut  uiais  baronum  meorum, 
"  vicinorum  suorum.  Tesnbus,  Andrea  Episcono  de  Cataneis,  WaltCi'o  filio  Allani, 
"  Ricardo  de  Morevila,  Alexandro  de  Seton,  Alexandio  de  Sancto  Martiuo,  Vv^al- 
*'  tero  de  Lmdeseyia,  David  de  Vuet,  et  Nicolao  Clerico,  apud  Scoon."  The  tran- 
tumpt  of  this  charter  I  have  seen  taken  before  "  Andreas  Dominus  Gray  Justi- 
*'  tiarius  supremi  Domini  nostri  Regis  ex  parte  australi  aqua:  de  Forth.  Apud 
"  Jedburgh  quarto  die  Novembris  1506"  (j).  Bat  this  IValterus  de  Riddell  ha- 
ving no  issue,  was  succeeded  in  his  estate  by  his  brother  Dominus  AnskitUle  de 
Riddell.  This  is  vouched,  and  nobly  instructed  by  a  bull  of  Pope  Adrian  IV.  (z), 
which  I  have  seen,  and  runs :  "  Adrianus  Episcopus,  servus  servorum  Dei,  Anski- 
"  tille  Riddell  militi,  salutem  &  Apostolicam  Benedictionem,  sub  Beati  Petri  & 
"  nostri  protectione.  Suscepimus  specialiter  ea  quas  Walterus  de  Riddell  testa- 
"  mentum  suum  ante  obitum  suum  faciens  tibi  noscitur  reliquisse,  viz.  Villas  de 
"  Wittuness,  Lilisclve,  Brachabe,  &■  cetera  bona  a  quibuscunque  tibi  juste  col- 
"  lata,  nos  authoritate  sedis  Apostolicas  integre  confirmamus.  Datum  Beneventi 
"  septimo  Idus  Aprilis."  The  jirecise  year  our  of  Lord  is  seldom  in  ancient  bulls: 
But  this  must  be  betwixt  the  jear  1154,  that  he  came  to  the  papacy,  and  the  1159 
that  he  died. 

There  is  another  bull  of  Pope  Alexander  UI.  who  succeeded  Pope  Adrian,  I  have 

(/>■)  Ibidem,  I  mean  Dugdnle's  Baronage  of  England!  {q)  Sir  James  Dalrymple's  Appendi.K  to  his- 
Histerical  Collections.  (r)  Dugdale.  (j')  This  inquiry  i\ito  the  possessions  of  the  See  of  Glasgow  is  in 
the  Register  of  the  bishopric,  and  the  e.xcerpt  published  by  Sir  James  Dalrymple.  {t)  Sir  J  imes  Dal- 
rvmple's  Collections  from  the  original  ivrits  of  the  priory  of  Coldingham,  belonging  to  the  Chapter  of 
Durham.  («)  Ibidem,  his  Collections,  p.  548.  («)  Penes  Sir  Walter  Riddell,  baronet,  and  these 
lands  are  now  the  barony  of  Riddell.  It  is  the  only  one  of  King  David's  I  have  seen  granted  to  a  laic, 
(j.)  This  transumpt  I  have  s.;en  -n  the  custody  of  Sir  Walter  Riddell  of  that  Ilk,  baronet,  (-z.)  Ptnes-. 
cundem  Dominum  Walterum  Riddel  de  eodem. 


296  APPENDIX. 

seen,  to  this  same  Sir  Amkhille  de  Riddell,  of  all  that  his  brother  had  left  him  by  tes- 
tament, and  confirming  an  agreement  betwixt  him  y  Huchtredum  Sacerdotem,  anent 
the  tithes  of  the  lands  of  Lilisclve,  by  the  mediation  of  King  Malcolm  IV.  («). 
This  Sir  Anskitille  de  Riddell  was  succeeded  by  Walter  de  Riddell  liis  son,  the  next 
in  the  line  of  succession  of  this  most  ancient  family.  Hugo  de  Riddell,  who  is  co- 
temporary  with  him,  must  be  a  younger  brother.  He,  Hugo  de  Riddell,  is  witness 
in  a  charter  of  cotifirmatiun  by  King  Malcolm,  to  the  abbacy  of  Kelso,  aimo 
ji^g{l>).  The  same  Hugo  de  Riddell  is  Dominus  de  Cranston,  who  is  to  be  found 
in  the  registers  of  Kelso,  as  a  donator  to  that  abbacy  of  the  foui  th  part  of  Cran- 
ston, afterwards  called  Little-Preston,  now  Prestonhall  (c).  From  this  Hugo  de 
Riddell  the  lands  were  called  Cranston-Riddell,  and  he  is  to  be  found  in  the  charters 
of  King  Malcolm,  and  King  William  his  brother,  and  successor,  in  the  registers  of 
Kelso.,  Scone,  and  the  extract  from  the  registers  of  Glasgow  (</).  He  is  the 
founder  of  the  Riddells  of  Cranston,  which  ended  in  an  heir-female,  who  was 
married  to  a  son  of  the  House  of  Crichton,  of  whom  came  the  Crichtons  of  Cran- 
ston-Riddell. Nothing  can  be  clearer  or  more  evident,  than  that  in  these  early 
times  we  are  upon,  the  family  of  the  Riddells  must  have  been  considered  in  the 
rank  and  quality  of  the  Magnates  and  the  Proceres  Regni  Scotia,  since  we  see  that, 
Hugo  de  R\dat,  who  is  but  a  branch  ot  the  House  of  Riddell,  is  sent  up  to  England 
as  one  uf  the  hostages  for  the  ransom  of  King  William,  who  had  been  taken  pri- 
soner at  the  battle  of  Alnwick,  anno  1174(f)  :  They  were  all  persons  of  the  tirst 
rank  and  condition,  the  Comites  and  the  Barones  Regni;  the  list  of  them,  taken, 
from  an  author  of  the  greatest  credit  (y),  here  follows: 

David  Comes,  as  he  is  designed,  the  king's  own  brother,  who  was  Earl  of  Hun^ 
tingdon  in  England,  and  Earl  of  Garioch  in  Scotland. 

Buncanus  Comes,  Earl  Duncan,  was  the  great  and  powerful  Earl  of  Fife. 

Waldevus  Comes  was  the  Earl  of  Dunbar. 

Gilbertus  Comes  was  the  Earl  of  Strathern. 

Comes  de  Angus,  that  was  Gilchrist  Ekrl  of  Angus. 

Then  follow  the  Barones  Scotia. 

Ricardus  de  Morvile,  Constabularius  Scotia. 

Ricardus  Cumine,  the  ancestor  of  the  House  of  the  Earls  of  Buchan. 

Walterus  Corbet. 

Walterus  Oliphard,  that  is  the  ancestor  of  Aberdalgy  and  Lord  Oliphant. 

Joannes  de  P'alz. 

Ifillielmus  de  Lindsay,  the  progenitor  of  the  Earls  of  Crawford  and  Lindsay. 

Philip  de  Colvile,  the  progenitor  of  the  Lords  Colvil  of  Ochiltiee,  and  the  Lord 
Colvil  of  Culross. 

Philip  de  Valoines. 

Robertus  Frebert. 

Robertus  de  Burnevile. 

Hugo  Gifurd. 

Hugo  R'iddell. 

Walterus  Barclay 

Willielmus  de  la  Haye. 

Willielmus  de  Mortuomari. 

But  to  return  to  the  stem  and  principal  family  of  the  Riddells,  the  House  ot 
Riddell  itself,  we  must  observe,  that,  from  the  ancient  writings  belonging  to  Sir 
Walter  Riddell  of  that  Ilk,  and  the  other  authentic  vouchers  we  have  mentioned 
to  support  the  authority  of  this  memorial,  it  is  evident,  that  Walter  de  Riddell  was 
the  son  and  heir  of  Sir  Anskitille  de  Riddell;  for  there  is  a  bull  by  Pope  Alexan- 
der IIL  Waltero  Riddell,  filio  domini  Anskitille  de  Riddell,  relative  to  the  lands  of 
W^ittuness,  Lilisclve.  There  are  remarks  upon  this  bull  by  a  very  learned  antiquary 
Mr  Thomas  Crawfurd,  who  was  a  professor  of  philosophy  in  the  University  of  Edin- 

(fl)  Charta  penes  Dom.  Walt.  Riddell  de  eodem.  (i)  Charter  cited  by  the  learned  Sir  James  Dal- 
Tymple  in  his  Collections,  p.  349,  to  be  penes  Comitem  de  Roxburgh.  (c)  Ibidem.  {d)  All  these 
vouchers  are  in  the  Bibliotheque  belonging  to  the  Advocates'  Library  at  Edinburgh,  (c)  Rymer's  Foc- 
dera  Anglite.      (/)  Ibid. 

3 


APPENDIX.  2(>7 

burgh,  at  ilie  R'-'stonuion  of  King  Charles  II.  and  lie  expressly  says,  that  IVultcr  (h- 
Ricide'il,  to  whom  the  bull  is  directed,  was  the  son  ot"  Sir  Anskitillc  Riddell ;  for 
when  Sir  James  Dalryniple  saw  this  bull,  that  worthy  learned  author  ingenuously 
teils  us,  tiiat  the  name  ot"  the  son  of  Sir  Anskitille  was  worn  out:  But  he  supposo 
it  to  be  Walter,  there  remaining,  adds  he,  "  Above  the  hole  in  the  parclinieiir, 
"  some  strokes  of  a  diub'e  /(',  as  the  initial  letter  for  IValterus,  which  no 
doubt  it  is;  and  when  Mr  Crawfurd  saw  it,  fifty  years,  or  more,  before  Sir  James 
perused  it,  the  name  JVuItenis  might  be  clearer,  aiid  more  perceptible  and  legible 
than  afterwards:  But  tlii>  by  the  bye. 

To  IVaitrriu  dc  RiilJill,  the  proprietor  of  the  estate  of  Riddell,  in  the  reign  of 
Iving  William,  succeeded  PatrUhis,  designed  ite  Riildell,  which  1  think,  implies  tiiat 
he  was  the  head  of  the  tamily.  He,  Patricias  de  Ridddl,  gives  to  the  monks  of 
Melrose,  "  Partem  terrac  in  territorio  de  Wittune,  pro  salute  animx>  Domini  Wil- 
"  lielmi  Regis  Scotiic(rt).  He  gives  moreover  to  the  convent  of  Melrose,  and  to 
the  monks  serving  God  tliere,  another  part  of  "Wittune,  "  Usque  ad  terrain  quam 
"  Willielnuisde  Riddeli  dedit  Matildae  Corbet  uxori  sudc  in  Wittune."  The  deed  is 
expressed  to  be  made.  Pro  salute  Domini  mei  Alexandri  Rfjis  Scotia:  (6),  which  must 
be  after  the  1214,  that  our  King  Alexander  U.  came  to  the  throne.  One  of  the  wit- 
nesses to  the  charter  is  JVa/tirus  de  Riddeli  Jilius  meus  (c).  He  had  also  another  son 
named  JVillielmusde  Riddeli.  To  Sir  Patrick  de  Riddeli  succeeded  ITalter  de  Riddeli 
hisson.  There  is  a  donationand  mortification  hy  R-jbertusde Buccleuxb,proanima  Ans- 
kitille de  Riddeli,  mei,  Domini  x3  pro  animahus  Patricii  de  Riddeli,  ii  Walteri  de  Riddeli 
Dominorum  rneorum,  of  lands  held  of  them  in  Wittune  (<•/).  There  is  another  donation 
by  IValterus  de  Riddeli,  Jilius  l^  hteres  Patricii  de  Riddeli,  whereby  ad  petitionem,  says 
he,Jilii  mei  isi  hieredis,  ^  Isabel  uxoris  suce,  he  ratifies  to  the  monks  of  Melrose, 
ilium  bovatum  terrae,  which  IViltielmus  Parsona  de  Hunam  pmx  based  a  IVillielmo 
Cocko,  testibus  Dom.  Patricio  Je  Riddeli  patre  meo,  that  was  his  father-in-law,  IVilli- 
elmo  fdio  meo  i^  haerede,  Patricio  filio  meo,  IVillielmo  nepote  meo  (f ).  Moreo\er  a 
subsequent  deed  and  charter  to  this  abbacy  confirms  that  to  IValterus  de  Riddeli. 
William,  his  eldest  son,  succeeded ;  tor  there  is  a  donation  to  the  abbot  and  con- 
vent of  Melrose,  by  Isabella,  "  uxor  Willielmi  de  Riddeli  de  alia  bovata  terne  in 
"  territorio  de  Wittune,  quam  pater  meus,  Willielmus  Parsona  de  Hunam  emit  a 
"  Gaufredo  Coco."  He  expresses  her  deed  to  be  made  "  Pro  salute  anima;  Do- 
"  mini  Patricii  de  Riddeli,  &•  Walteri  filii  ejus,  &  Willielmi  sponsi  mei."  To 
which  there  are  witnesses  Dominus  Patricius  de  R'ddell,  IValterus  de  Riddeli  Jilius 
meus,  lyillielmus  de  Riddeli  sponsus  meus,  Willielmus  Jilius  noster,  Patricius  Jilius 
Walteri  de  Riddeli  (/J.  So  we  see  this  last  writ  instructs  four  successive  descents 
in  the  family,  which  is  much  in  an  extrinsic  voucher,  and  a  great  deal  in  re  tarn  an- 
tiqua,  for  supporting  the  antiquity  of  the  family.  This  Willielmus  de  Riddeli,  the 
head  of  the  family  of  Riddeli,  is  the  same  person  who,  in  the  register  of  Melrose, 
is  witness  in  a  charter  granted  by  Joannes  de  Vesci  Witlielmo  de  Sprouston  de  nova 
terra  de  Mow  {g).  Willielmus  de  Riddeli,  the  son  of  the  former  William  de  Rid- 
deli, in  the  reign  of  David  II.  as  I  conjecture,  is  in  the  quality  and  rank  of  a 
knight,  miles,  when  he  ratifies  and  confirms  certain  lands  that  Adam  Dunelm, 
that  is  Durham,  his  vassal,  held  of  him,  which  he  then  sold  to  the  monastery  of 
Melrose,  in  W"ester-Lilisclve(/j). 

The  next  in  the  line  of  succession  in  the  principal  family  of  Riddeli,  Riddeli  of 
that  Ilk,  is  ^lintin  de  Riddeli  de  Wittune,  who  is  the  first  that  the  charters  of  the 
family  that  are  nov/  extant  begin  with,  in  the  custody  of  Sir  Walter  Riddeli  of 
that  Ilk,  baronet ;  though  I  think  he  can  scarcely  be  the  immediate  son  of  the 
last-mentioned  Sir  William;  he  may,  indeed,  without  any  stretch  in  chronology, 
be  his  grandson;  but  he  is  very  plainly  and  clearly  the  successor  and  lineal  heir  to 
all  those  ancient  barons  of  Riddeli  who  had  the  lands  and  estate  of  Wittuness, 
Brachabe,  and  LiUsclve,  from  King  David  I.     And  this  gentleman,  Qiiintin  Rid- 

(a)  Chattulary  of  Melrose,  of  which  there  are  tuo,  one  belonging  to  the  Earl  of  Haddington,  and 
a  lesser  one  to  the  Lawyers  at  Edinburgh.  (i)  Ibidejn.  {c)  Ibidem.  {d)  Ibidem.  («•)  Ibidem. 
(/)  Mr  Nisbet  in  his  Treatise  of  Heraldry,  from  the  chartulary  of  Melrose,  p.  375.  (^)  Char- 
tulary  of  Melrose.       (A)  Charta  penes  Dom.  Walt.  Riddeli  de  eodem. 

Vol.  II.  7  N 


298  APPENDIX. 

dell,  being  found  vested  in  that  very  estate,  it  cannot  remain  a  question  but  that 
he  is  heir  to  them,  and  their  lineal  legal  successor:  For  George  Rutherford,  bailie 
to  the  said  Q_i.nntin  Riddell  of  VVittuness,  by  an  inquisition,  hnds  him  duly  vested 
in  the  estate  of  Riddell,  in  his  court  at  Wittuness,  the  4th  of  July  1421  (rt),  vi'hich 
was  the  14th  year  of  the  reign  of  King  James  I.  I  could  not  vouch,  from  the 
writs  of  the  family  of  Riddell,  to  whom  this  Qiiintin  was  allied  in  marriage:  But  he 
is  in  a  particular  friendship  and  confidence  with  the  Rutherfords;  so  perhaps  he 
was  allied  with  them ;  but  this  I  offer  no  otherwise  than  as  a  conjecture,  for  it  will 
bear  no  more. 

He,  QuiNTiN  Riddell  of  Wittuness,  the  Laird  of  Riddell  of  that  Ilk,  was  suc- 
ceeded by  James  Riddell  of  Wittuness,  his  grandson :  This  is  vouched  from  his 
service  in  the  charter-chest  of  the  family  of  Riddell  (i),  whereby,  on  the  4th  of 
May  1471,  at  Jedburgh,  an  inquest  of  very  honourable  gentlemen  find,  "  Qj^iod 
"  Jacobus  Riddell  de  eodem,  &  legitimus  &  propinquior  hi«res  quondam  Qj^iin- 
"  tini  Riddell,  sui  avi ;"  it  is  in  the  lands  of  Roxburgh,  as  well  as  in  the  other 
estates  he  died  vested  in.  This  gentleman.  Jacobus  Riddell  de  eodem,  directs  a  pre- 
cept to  his  bailiff,  for  infefting  WiUiam  Davidson,  his  vassal,  in  the  lands  of  Heath- 
bands.     He  was  succeeded  by 

John  Riddell  of  that  Ilk,  his  son :  There  is  a  precept  directed  from  James,  Arch- 
bishop of  Glasgow,  for  infefting  John  Riddell  of  that  Ilk  in  the  lands  of  Lilisclve, 
which  he  held  of  that  See  in  15 10;  and  another  precept  from  the  next  succeeding 
archbishop  to  the  same  effect  (t),  anno  1518.  This  is  the  Laird  of  Riddell,  who 
knowing  the  value  of  his  original  charter  from  King  David  I.  of  the  estate  of  Rid- 
dell, which  is  indeed  so  ancient,  as  I  have  never  seen  any  other  from  this  king  to 
a  laic  but  itself;  and  by  its  high  antiquity,  even  then,  hkely  to  deface,  and  the 
writing  to  wear  out,  so,  to  preserve  so  valuable  a  monument  and  record  of  his  fa- 
mily, he  applied  by  petition  to  the  Lord  Gray,  Justice-General  be-south  Forth,  to 
have  the  original  charter  transumed,  and  which  was  accordingly  done  in  a  jus- 
tice-air held  at  Jedburgh,  as  has  been  formerly  observed  in  the  preceding  part  of  this 
memorial,  anno  1506.  This  same  Joannes  Riddell  de  eodem  grants  a  precept  for  in- 
fefting Patrick  Earl  of  Bothwell,  as  heir  to  Patrick  Earl  of  Bothwell,  his  father, 
in  a  part  of  the  lands  of  Lilisclve,  anno  1534,  which  he  held  of  the  Laird  of  Rid- 
dell (rf).     He  left  behind  him  several  sons, 

Walter,  his  heir  and  successor. 

John  Riddell  designed  of  Robbine  (f). 

William  Riddell,  a  third  son  CfJ- 

Walter  Riddell  of  that  Ilk  succeeded   his   father,  to  whom  he  is  served  heir 

anno  1588  {g).     He   married ,  daughter  of  Sir  George  Ramsay  of 

Dalhousie,  ancestor  to  the  Earl  of  Dalhousie  {h),  and  had  a  son,  his  heir,  viz. 

Andrew  Riddell  of  that  Ilk,  who  has  a  charter  of  his  estate  under  the  Great 
Seal,  filio  et  haredi  Walteri  Riddell  de  eodem,  dated  the  4th  March  1591  (/).  Tliis 
gentleman  married,  first, ,  daughter  of  Sir  James  Pringle  of  Gala- 
shiels {k)  ;  and  had  issue,  Sir  John,  his  eldest  son,  the  first  baronet  of  this  most 
ancient  family  (/).  William,  of  whom  are  the  Riddells  of  Newhouse,  and  James 
Riddell  of  Mayboll  (;n).  He  married  to  his  second  wife,  Viola,  daughter  of  William 
Douglas  of  Pompherston,  a  very  ancient  family  of  that  name  in  Linlithgow- 
■ihixeCnJ  ;  by  whom  he  had  a  son,  Walter  Riddell,  the  progenitor  of  the  Rid- 
dells of  Haining  in  Teviotdale,  which,  in  our  own  time,  ended  in  an  heir-female, 
Mrs  Magdalen  Riddell,  who  was  married  to  Mr  David  Erskine  of  Dun,  one  of 
the  Senators  of  the  College  of  Justice,  and  had  issue  ;  he  had  also  several  daugh- 
ters, Margaret,  who  was  married  to  Robert  Rutherfoal  of  Edgerstone,  ancestor  to 
Sir  John  Rutherford  of  that  Ilk  foj  ;  another  to  Sir  James  Scott  of  Goldielands; 
and  a  third  daughter,  Isabel,  who  was  married  to  Robert  Kerr  of  Cavers  (pj,  of 
whom  that  family  is  descended;  and  the  youngest  to  John  Baillieof  St  John's-Kiik 
in  the  shire  of  Lanark,  of  whom   Somerville  of  Corhouse  is  the  hneal  heir. 

(a)  Charta  penes  Dora.  Walt.  Riddell  de  eodem.  {b)  Charta  penes  Dom.  Walt.  Riddell  de  eodem, 
I  saw  the  writs  fvom  the  originals,  (rj)  Ibidem.  (^J)  Ibidem.  (.)  Ibidem,  (/■- Ibidem.  (^  Ibidem. 
(/.)  Ibidem.  (/)  Ibidem.  (^)  Memorial  of  tl.e  family  of  Riddell,  from  the  wrus  of  the  family  tranbmit- 
ed  to  me.  (/)  Ibidem.  (ni)  Ibidem.  (fj)  Ibidem,  and  the  Registers  of  the  Heralds.  (o)  Ibidem. 
(/))  Memorial  of  the  House  of  Riddell,  and  other  authentic  vouchers  confirming  it. 
I 


APPENDIX.  209 

Su-  John  Riddell,  the  tiist  baronet  in  the  family,  created  the  20th  of  March 
162S,  was  married  to  Agnes,  daughter  of  Sir  John  Murray  of  Blackbarony,  by 
Duma  Margaret,  his  wife,  daughter  of  Sir  Alexander  Hamilton  of  liinerwick,  the 
first  and  most  ancient  branch  of  the  illustrious  House  of  Hamilton.  This  alliance 
brought  a  great  many  relations  to  the  house  of  Riddell ;  for  the  lady  had  a  sister. 
Dame  Elizabeth  Murray,  who  was  married  to  Sir  Robert  Kerr  of  Ancrum,  created 
Earl  of  Ancrum  in  the  1633  :  she  was  liis  first  lady,  and  was  mother  to  William 
Earl  of  Lothian,  who  was  Secretary  in  the  time  of  King  Charles  I.;.  Dame  Marga- 
ret Murray,  another  sister,  was  married  to  Sir  Robert  Halkct  of  Piiferran,  and  had 
issue.  iSIary,  married  to  Patrick  Murray  of  Philiphaugh,  and  had  issue  ;  and  Isa- 
bel, married  to  Sir  Patrick  Scott  of  Thirlestane,  and  had  issue; ,  married 

to  Sir  James  Douglas  of  Colphople ;  and ,  married  to  Veitch  of  Dawick. 

Sir  John  Riddell  had  issue  by  his  lady,  Dame  Agnes  Murray,  Sir  Walter,  his 
heir  and  successor.  Sir  William  Riddell,  Governor  of  Dusburgh  in  Holland,  John 
and  Thomas  who  were  Captains  in  the  service  of  the  States  of  the  United  Pro- 
vinces; he  had  also  a  daughter, ,  who  was  married  to  Sir  Thomas  Kerr 

of  Cavers,  and  had  issue. 

He  married  to  his  second  wife.  Dame  Anne  Anstruther,  daughter  of  Sir  Wil- 
liam Anstruther  of  that  Ilk,  by  whom  he  had  only  one  daughter,  who  was  married 
to  David  Barclay  of  Cullernv,  one  of  the  ancientest  families  in  all  the  county  of 
Fife  00- 

Sir  Walter  Riddell  of  that  Ilk,  the  next  baronet  in  the  family,  married  Dame 
Janet  Rigg,  a  lady  highly  extolled  for  piety  and  all  the  graces  that  could_adorn  the  sex. 
She  was  the  daughter  of  ^very  worthy  man,  William  Rigg  of  Aitherny,  who  liad 
a  great  estate  both  in  the  shire  of  Fife  and  near  Edinburgh  :  but  he  was  richer  in 
good  works  (/?},  as  from  a  manuscript  of  his  life  (c).  He  was  a  great  supporter  of 
the  presbyterian  clergy,  especially  in  the  city  of  Edinburgh,  in  the  opposition  they 
made  to  the  violent  efforts  the  court  and  the  bishops  made  in  pressing  conformity 
to  the  five  articles  of  Perth  assembly,  ratified  by  act  of  Parliament  1621.  By  this 
pious  lady,  Sir  Walter  Riddell  of  that  Ilk  had  issue.  Sir  John  Riddell  of  that  Ilk, 
his  heir  and  successor,  who  married  Helen,  daughter  of  Sir  Alexander  Mor- 
rison of  Presrongrange,  by  Dame  Jean  Boyd,  daughter  of  Robert  Lord  Boyd;  by 
her  he  had  Sir  Walter  Riddell  of  that  Ilk,  Bart,  the  present  representative  of  this 
ancient  family,  who  married  Mrs  Margaret  Watt,  daughter  to  John  Watt  of  Rose- 
hill,  Esq.  and  have  issue  five  sons  and  three  daughters,  and  a  daughter  married  to 
Hary  Nisbet,  son  and  heir  apparent  to  Sir  Patrick  Nisbet  of  Dean,  Bart,  and  had 
issue. 

The  second  son  of  Sir  Walter  Riddell  of  that  Ilk,  and  Dame  Janet  Rigg, 
was  Mr  William  Riddell,  who  was  bred  to  the  profession  of  the  law,  and  was  an 
Advocate  betbre  the  Court  of  Session,  where  he  served  long  with  reputation  and 
integrity  ;  he  acquired  first  the  estate  of  Friershaw,  and  is  the  ancestor  of  that 
branch  of  the  family,  designed  Riddell  of  Glenriddellin  Drumfries-shire.  He  mar- 
ried Elizabeth  Wauchope,  eldest  daughter  of  Captain  Francis  Wauchope,  only  bro- 
ther of  John  Wauchope  of  Niddry,  a  ramily  of  higher  antiquity  than  many  others 
in  the  county  of  Edinburgh  where  they  reside. 

The  lady  was  sister  toMajor-GeneralJohn,and  Major-Gen;ral  Francis  Wauchopes, 
two  officers  of  great  name  and  high  reputation  for  conduct,  courage,  and  valour,  as 
any  two  oflicers  of  their  profession  that  belonged  to  the  foreign  service:  Upon  the 
Revolution  both  of  the  brothers  went  over  to  France  to  follovv"  the  fortunes  of  their 
master  King  James  VII.;  they  had  high  commands  in  tl;e  French  and  Spanish  ser- 
vice, which  they  still  maintained  with  great  honour  and  reputation  fdj.  There  was 
one  thing  ve;y  remarkable  of  the  two  General  Wauchopes,  viz.  That  the  eldest  bro- 
ther, though  he  was  in  as  many  public  and  more  private  engagements  as  an  officer 
of  distinction,  he  never  received  a  wound,  nor  had  his  blood  so  much  as  once  drawn, 
till  he  was  killed  in  the  war  in  Catalonia,  where  he  commanded  the  foot.  And  of 
his  younger  brother  General  Wauchope,  he  was  almost  wounded  in  every  battle  he 

(a)  Memorial  itortiaid  of  the  family  of  Glenriddell.  (i)  Mr  Dnviil  Caldenvood  gives  him  in  his  his 
tury,  toward  the  erd,  a  high  chaiacter.  [c)  Memoirs  of  Bailie  William  Rigg  of  Aitlierny.  (/)  Memo 
rial  of  Riddell  of  Glenridjle. 


30C 


APPENDIX. 


was  engaged  in ;  yet  died  in  his  bed,  Governor  of  Cagliari  in  Sardinia,  in  the  Spa^ 
nish  service.  By  Mrs  Elizabeth  Wauchope,  Mr  William  Riddell,  Advocate,  had 
issue,  Walter  Riddell  of  Glcnriddell,  his  son  and  heir,  who  married  Catharine,  eldest 
daughter  of  Sir  Robert  Laurie  of  Maxwelton,  by  whom  he  has  two  son<;,  Robert 
Riddell,  apparent  heir  of  Glenriddell,  who  is  married  to  Jean,  daughter  of  Alexan- 
der Fergusson  of  Craigdarroch,  and  has  issue  one  son,  Walter,  and  three  daughters. 

John  Riddell,  the  second  son,  who  is  of  Grange  in  Fife.  He  married  Helen, 
daughter  of  Sir  Michael  Balfour  of  Denmiln,  and  has  issue,  two  sons  and  two 
daughters. 

Mr  Archibald  Riddell  (the  third  and  youngest  son  of  Sir  Walter  Riddell  of 
that  Ilk,  and  Dame  Janet  Rigg)  was  one  of  the  Ministers  of  the  Gospel  at  Edinburgh, 
who  had  issue,  Walter  Riddell  of  Granton,  captain  of  a  man  of  war,  who  died 
without  issue,  and  Doctor  John  Riddell,  Physician  at  Edinburgh;  his  son  is  John 
Riddell,  Writer  to  the  Signet,  who  married  Mrs  Christian  Nisbet,  daughter  of  Sir 
John  Nisbet  of  Dean,  Bart,  and  has  issue. 


F  I  N  I  S. 


HISTORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 


FRYNNE'S     HISTORY, 


so  FAR  AS  CONCERNS- 


THE  SUBMSSION  AND  FEALTY  SWORN  BY  THE  GENERALITY  OF 
THE  SCOTS  NATION  TO  KING  EDWARD  I.  OF  ENGLAND, 

IN  1292,  1296,  1297,  b'r. 


COMMONLT  CALLED 


THE  RAGMAN-ROLL. 


THE  submission  and  fealty  of  the  Scots  nation  was  very  universal,  and'  taken 
through  different  places  of  the  kingdom ;  the  first  I  take  notice  of  is  on  the 
7th  of  July  1292  (rt),  those  who  swore  to  King  Edward  of  England,  viz.  Fergus  Mac- 
dowald,  Dougal  Macdowyl,  Del  Count  de  Wigtoun :  These  two  gentlemen  are  of  the  fa- 
mily of  the  Macdowals,  or  Macdouals,  or  Mncdowyles.  There  are  four  families  of 
the  surname  of  M'Dowall,  who  all  claim  and  set  up  for  independency  on  one  another ; 
they  all  agree  they  are  descended  of  the  most  ancient  princes  or  barons,  iS  Domini 
Galluidie,  or  de  Galveyin;  the  name  is  a  patronymic,  called  after  the  proper  name 
of  Doual,  or  Dougal,  their  common  progenitor,  which  must  be  as  old  as  the  reign 
of  King  David  I.  since  there  is  none  of  the  old  family  of  Galloway  of  that  name, 
since  that  Ulgerick  and  Dovenald,  the  two  prime  leaders  of  the  Galvegians,  were 
killed  at  the  battle  of  Allerton  in  the  1 138.  Some  modern  critics  are  of  opinion, 
though  it  is  but  conjectural  at  best,  that  the  race  of  the  M'Dowalls  are  sprung- 
from  Thomas,  called  Macduallan,  son  to  Allan  Lord  of  Galloway,  in  the  reign  of  King 
Alexander  II.  and  from  him  they  are  denominated  Macduallans,  that  is  the  offspring- 
and  descendants  of  Thomas,  the  son  of  Black,  or  Du  Allan :  None  of  all  the  families 
of  the  M'Dowalls  have  any  very  ancient  writs.    Makerston  lias  a  charter  of  the  ba- 

(a)  Prynne's  History,  page  649, 

Vol.  IL  7  O 


i  HISTORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 

rony  of  Makerston,  Yetham,  &c.  to  Fergus  M'Dougall,  or  M'Dowall,  on  the  re- 
signation of  Margaret  Fraser,  his  mother,  in  the  rolls  of  King  Robert  II.  anno  1373. 
Garthland's  first  charter  is  in  1413,  by  Archibald  Earl  of  Douglas,  Dominus  Galiu- 
die  'c?  AnnandaUe,  Thome  Macdowal,  of  the  lands  of  Garthland.  Logan  produces 
a  charter  in  1453,  to  Andrew  M'Dowall,  of  several  lands  which  Uthred  M'Dowall 
of  Garthland  held  of  him.  And  Freugh  has  a  charter  of  the  lands  of  Ravenston, 
to  Fergus  M'Dowall  of  Freugh,  who  had  married  the  heiress  of  Gilbert  Maclelland 
of  Ravenston,  and  to  Fergus  M'Dowall,  his  son  and  heir  apparent,  in  the  1445. 
These  documents  are  all  the  M'Dowalls  can  produce,  to  vouch  their  respective 
antiquity ;  for  the  two  gentlemen  here  in  the  Ragiiian-Roll,  all  the  three  families 
in  the  shire  of  Wigton  claim  them  to  be  their  ancestors. 

William  de  Murrcff  de  Dnirhsar^ard;  whose  son,  Dominus  Joannes  de  Moravia, 
Domnus  de  Drumsargaid,  obtained  the  lands  of  Ogilvie,  Abercairny,  and  Glen- 
sherop,  by  the  marriage  of  Mary,  daughter  of  Malise  Earl  of  Strathern,  and  is  the 
well  known  ancestor  to  the  moit  ancient  and  honourable  family  of  Abercairny,  in 
the  county  of  Perth,  where  they  had  long  nourished,  and  still  continue  in  lustre; 
who,  as  an  heir  of  line  of  the  ancient  Earls  of  Strathern,  carries,  quarterly,  first 
and  fourth  Murray ;  second  and  third  a  cheveron,  surmounted  of  another,  for 
Strathern,  and  is  the  coat-armorial  of  James  Murray  of  Abercairny,  who  is  the 
lineal  heir  of  this  WiUielmus  de  Moravia,  de  Drumsargard. 

Roger  de  Methfen;  this  gentleman  had  the  estate  of  Methven,  and  is  a  frequent 
witness  to  charters  granted  in  the  time  of  King  Robert  I.  to  several  of  the  an- 
cientest  families  in  the  county  of  Perth,  and  is  designed  Rogerus  de  Methfen, 
miles  (a).  There  was  a  small  family  designed  of  Methven,  of  whom  was  Dr  John 
Methven,  who  was  Vicar  of  Edinburgh,  and  Register  in  the  reign  of  King  James  II. 
Of  the  same  race  of  people  was  Paul  Methuen,  Esq.  once  Secretary  of  State,  who 
owns  his  extraction  from  Scotland,  and  from  the  Methvens. 

Gilchrist  More  is  the  same  gentleman  that  was  son  to  Reginald  More,  designed 
of  Craig,  i.  e.  the  Craig  of  Rowallan,  and  brother  to  Sir  Adam  Mure  of  Rowallan. 

Hew  de  Ralstoun;  this  is  the  ancestor  of  Ralston  of  that  Ilk,  a  family  of  anti- 
quity in  the  county  of  Renfrev/,  as  far  up  as  the  reign  of  Alexander  111.  and  give 
out  as  the  tradition  that  they  are  descended  of  a  son  of  the  Earls  of  Fife.  But 
how  the  tradition  is  vouched  I  cannot  say;  but  their  arms  do  not  favour  that, 
for  they  do  not  wear  the  lion  rampant,  the  arms  of  the  Earl  of  Fife,  but  three 
acorns  on  a  bend,  intimating,  that  they  are  of  the  same  race  and  stock  with  those 
of  the  surname  of  Muirhead. 

John  Senescal  de  Jedwitb  ;  he,  in  the  opinion  of  a  very  great  antiquary  {b),  was 
the  same  John  Stewart  who  is,  in  other  places  of  this  fealty,  designed  frater  ger- 
mamis  Jacobi  Senescalli  Scotiae,  grandfather  to  King  Robert  II.  and  was  the  root 
of  the  Stewarts  of  Bonkill,  and  the  same  brave  gallant  man  that  was  slain  in  the 
service  of  his  country  at  the  battle  of  Falkirk  anno  1298.  He  had  many  sons,  of 
whom  sprang  a  great  many  illustrious  branches  of  the  serene  race  of  the  Stewarts. 
Sir  Alexander  Stewart,  his  eldest  son,  designed  of  Bonkill  (c),  was,  upon  the  for- 
feiture of  the  English  family  of  the  Umfravilles,  created  Earl  of  Angus  in  the 
1327.  Sir  Allan,  another  son,  was  the  stem  of  the  noble  family  of  the  Stewarts  of 
Darnly,  from  whom  flowed  the  Earls  and  Dukes  of  Lenjio.x,  which  failed  in  the 
1672;  to  whom  his  Majesty  King  Charles  II.  succeeded  as  his  nearest  and  lawfid 
heir-male  (</).  Sir  Walter  Stewart,  the  third  son,  of  whom  the  Stewarts  of  Dal- 
swinton,  of  whom  are  the  House  of  Garlics,  the  Earls  of  Galloway,  by  an  heir  of 
line,  and  at  law.  Sir  James  Stewart  of  Peirston,  in  Cunningham,  of  whom  Iimer- 
met'h,  Lorn,  both  Lords  of  Parliament,  Rosyth  and  Craigjehall,  Grandtully,'  and_ 
several  of  the  illustrious  families  of  the  Stewarts  are  branched.  John  Stewart  of 
Jedwith  was  the  youngest  son  that  I  have  seen  any  authentic  voucher  for:  He  is 
designed  Johannes-^Senescallus  de  Jedwith,  and  is  bailie  to  the  Abbot  of  Kelso,  in 
the  1325  (e).     William  Stewart  of  Jedwith,  and  sheriff"  of  Teviotdale,  his  son  or 

(fl)  In  the  Writs  of  the  Hou<ie  of  Abercairny.  {!>)  Mr  David  Simpson  Historiographer  of  Scotland. 
(c)  Dr  John  B;irbour's  L'fe  of  King  Robert  I.  {_d)  Tne  King's  Retour  in  the  Chancery.  (f)  Char- 
tulary  of  Kelso. 


ON  THE  RAGMAN-ROLL.  5 

successor,  in  the  ruignof  King  Robert  IIL  married  his  eldest  son  and  heir  apparent 
to  Marietta  Stewart,  only  daughter  and  lieir  of  Sir  Walter  Stewart  of  Dalswintoii, 
anno  1397;  of  this  double  race  of  the  Stewarts  is  the  Earl  of  Galloway,  as  he  is 
also  of  an  heir-female  of  another  brother,  as  we  have  observed  in  this  criticism. 

iniliam  de  Miirreffde  Tbolybaidiae;  this  is  the  ancestor  of  the  most  noble  and 
illustrious  family  of  Tullibardin,  in  the  county  of  Perth,  tliat  were  an  early 
branch  of  the  Riurrays  of  the  House  of  Duffus,  the  root  of  all  the  Murrays.  The 
family  was  first  raised  to  the  honour  of  the  peerage  in  the  1604,  created  Earls  of 
Tullibardin  in  1606,  Marquis  of  Athol  anno  i6-j6,  and  Duke  of  Athol  in  1703. 

John  de  Montgomery  is  designed  del  Conte  de  Lanerk,  and  the  same  gentleman 
that  comes  to  be  designed  de  Eglishnn"  in  the  barony  of  Renfrew;  but  at  that 
time,  and  long  afterwards,  in  the  county  of  Lanark,  till  the  reign  of  Robert  IIL 
he  is  designed  del  Count  de  Lnneik,  to  distinguish  him  from  Murtbak  de  Montgomery 
del  Conte  de  jiii\  who  was  the  progenitor  of  the  Montgomeries  of  Stair.  Alex- 
ander Montgomery,  chevalier,  was  his  son  and  heir  in  the  1357,  and  is  Domintts  de 
Eglishame,  as  Sir  John  de  Montgomery  de  Egushmne,  his  son,  in  the  1388,  who  obtained 
the  great  barony  of  Ardrossan  and  Eglinton,  by  the  marriage  of  Elizabeth,  the 
daughter  and  sole  heir  of  Sir  Hugh  Eglinton  of  that  Ilk,  one  of  the  two  great 
Justiciaries  of  Scotland,  in  the  reign  of  King  David  II.  cinno  1361,  by  Giles,  or 
Egidia,  his  wife,  daughter  of  Walter,  Great  Steward  of  Scotland,  and  sister  to  King 
Robert  II.  These  facts  are  all  vouched  from  the  original  writs  of  the  lands  and  estate 
of  Bonnyton  in  Edinburgh-jhire,  which  this  lady  gives  to  Alexander  Montgomery, 
her  second  son,  in  the  1387,  with  consent  of  John  Montgomery  of  Ardrossan,  her 
eldest  son,  whose  son  and  heir,  Alexander  Montgomery,  is  intitled  Domintis  de  Ar- 
drossan, in  the  1453,  when  he  gives  the  lands  of  Lochlebo,  &.c.  in  the  barony  of 
Renfrew,  to  George  Montgomery  his  son,  to  be  held  of  him  and  his  heirs  Dominis 
de  Ardrossan:  Which  is  confirmed  by  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal,  I  have  seen 
thus  (/).  This  Alexander  de  Montgumery  Domiuus  de  Ardrossan  was  the  first  Lord 
of  Parliament  of  the  House  of  Montgomery  nominated  and  invested  in  that  newly 
introduced  honour,  by  King  James  I.  in  the  1427  {g).  Hugh  Lord  Montgomery 
was  raised  to  the  honour  of  Earl  of  Eglinton  by  King  James  IV.  anno  1506,  whose 
heir  and  successor  is  Alexander  Earl  of  Eglinton. 

Reginald  More  de  Craig,  that  is  of  the  Craig  of  Rowallan,  who  had  Sir  Adam, 
of  whom  the  ancient  r.nd  honourable  family  of  Rowallan.  Reginald  was  his  se- 
cond son,  who,  in  the  1329,  was  Chamberlain  of  Scotland ;  of  whom  the  Muirs 
of  Abercom,  by  the  marriage  of  the  heir  of  the  great  family  of  the  Grahams. 
The  direct  male  line  of  this  house  of  the  Muirs  ended  in  an  heir-female,  Ellen, 
who  married  Sir  William  Lindsay  of  Byres,  in  the  reign  of  King  Robert  II.  anno 
1371.  He  was  the  direct  ancestor  of  the  Lord  Lindsay  of  the  Byres,  and  the  pre- 
sent Earl  pf  Crawford  ;  who,  till  they  came  to  enjoy  the  title  of  Earl  of  Crawford, 
by  the  attainder  of  Lodov.'ick  Ear!  of  Crawford,  anno  1644  (A),  carried  in  their 
coat-armour  the  three  stars  in  chief  of  the  fesse  cheque,  as  the  composed  coat  of 
Lindsay  and  Muir. 

Thomas  de  Montgomery,  and  Murchau  de  Montgomery  del  Count  de  Air,  I  take 
to  be  the  other  great  family  of  the  Montgomerys  of  Stair  in  King's-Kyle,  of  whom, 
through  a  series  of  heirs  of  the  Montgomerys,  that  barony  came  to  be  heri- 
tably transferred  to  the  Dalrymples,  the  ancestors  of  the  present  John  Earl  of 
Stair. 

Halter  ftz  Gilbert  de Hamildon  ^  most  of  OUT  modem  antiquaiies,  following  the 
sentiments  and  opinions  of  a  very  learned  antiquary,  and  a  very  worthy  ingenious 
gentleman,  Mr  Hamilton  of  Wishaw,  think  that  this  great  man,  designed  patro- 
nymically,  v.as  the  ancestor  of  his  Gracie  the  Duke  of  Hamilton.  I  have  some 
difficulty  about  it  myself,  how  he  came  to  take  or  assume  tile  surname  of  Hamil- 
ton, or  where  that  place  lay  :  for  it  is  not  the  barony  now,  and  for  many  centuries 
bypast,  called  Hamilton ;  for  at  this  time,  anno  1292,  it  was  then  called  Baronia 

{f)  In  the  har.Ci  of  S:r  Hugh  Montgomerv  of  Skelmorly,  the  sime  George  being  his  ancestor.. 
{g)  He  is  inter  Dominos  Parliament!  1429  in  the  records.       (h)  Rccinded  zc's  cf  Parliament. 


4  HISTORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 

de  Cadiow,  and  was  crown  lands,  and  where  our  kings  in  these  ancient  times  had 
a  seat ;  as  is  clear  from  the  many  charters  that  are  dated  apitd  Cadiow.  That 
that  barony  was  in  the  crown  in  the  time  of  King  Robert  1.  is  evident  from  a 
charter  granted  by  that  monarch,  "  Fratvibus  Prsdicatoribus  de  Glasgow,  de 
"  annuo  redditu  viginti  mercarum  Sterlingorum,  debito  et  exeunte  de  Baronia 
"  nostra  de  Cadiow."  It  is  true  that  King  Robert,  after  this,  gives  Waltero  filio 
Gilberti  Baroniam  de  Cadiow  ;  but  no  otherwise  designed  them  patronymically, 
IValterus  flius  Gilberti,  who  is  the  sure  and  certain  ancestor  of  the  most  noble  and 
illustrious  family  of  Hamilton  ;  but  whether  he  be  the  same  individual  great  man 
with  the  former  Walter fitz  Gilbert  de  Hamidlon  is  more  than  1  can  say,  since  the 
son  of  Sir  Walter,  the  son  of  Sir  Gilbert,  does  not  use  any  surname,  but  is  called 
Dowinus  David  filius  Walterifilii  Gilberti  7iiilitis,  when  he  mortifies  to  the  Chapter 
of  the  See  of  Glasgow  a  certam  annuity  out  of  his  barony  of  Kinniel,  anno  1361. 
His  son  David,  Dominus  David,  filius  Davidis,  filii  Walteri,  filii  Gilberti,  in  the 
1375,  in  a  charter  in  the  rolls,  designs  himself  dt  Hmnyldon.  There  has  been 
something  extraordinary  in  their  resuming  the  surname  of  Hamildon,  if  they  be 
descended  of  IValttr  fitz  Gilbert  de  Hamildon,  that  I  cannot  account  for  ;  and  1  am 
sure,  that  at  the  same  time  the  second  Sir  David  Hamilton  of  Cadyow  assumes  or 
resumes  the  surname  of  Hamilton,  Johannes  filius  Walteri,  as  he  calls  himself,  his 
uncle,  takes  the  surname  of  Hamilton,  and  the  designation  of  Fingleton  and  Rosa- 
ven  ;  and  his  brother.  Sir  Alexander  Hamilton,  in  the  1387,  has  a  charter  from  the 
crown  of  a  part  of  the  lands  of  Innerwick,  and  to  the  heirs  to  be  procreated  be- 
twixt him  and  a  noble  lady  his  wife,  Elizabeth,  daughter  and  co-heir  of  Thomas 
Stewart  Earl  of  Angus,  of  whom  Alexander  Hamilton  of  Innerwick,  Esq.  is  the 
lineal  descendant,  who  carries  the  composed  coats  of  Hamilton  and  Stewart,  to 
perpetuate  the  memory  of  that  illustrious  alhance,  the  three  cinquefoils  betwixt 
the  fesse  chequi  of  the  Stewarts. 

Robert  Cruck  de  Tmgaldston  was  at  that  time  the  head  of  an  ancient  family  of 
the  Crucks,  who  had  the  lands  of  Crucksfie,  >.  e.  Cruxston,  Nielston,  and  Fingle- 
ton, all  in  the  barony  of  Renfrew  ;  which  lands  came  in  the  reign  of  King  David 
U.  by  marriage  to  the  Stewarts  of  Darnly,  and  to  the  Hamiltons  of  Fingleton  and 
Preston,  esteemed  the  first  and  most  ancient  cadet  of  the  House  of  Hamilton, 
which  failed  in  the  person  of  Sir  William  Hamilton,  who  died  at  Exeter  in  No- 
vember i688,  soon  after  the  Prince  of  Orange's  expedition  to  Great  Britain,  where 
he  had  a  considerable  command  in  the  prince's  army. 

June  I.  1292  (i).  The  Lords  of  the  Regency  of  Scotland  then  swore  fealty,  and 
made  their  respective  submissions  to  King  Edward  I.  as  direct  superior  lord  of 
the  kingdom  of  Scotland,  or  the  Guardians  of  the  Realm,  as  they  were  called, 
viz. 

William  Fraser,  Bishop  of  St  Andrews  ;  he  was  Chancellor  of  Scotland,  ^  whom  a 
full  account  may  be  seen  in  the  Lives  of  the  Chancellors  of  Scotland,  published 
by  Mr  Crawfurd. 

Robert  Wishart,  Bishop  of  Glasgow ;  this  is  the  noble  celebrated  prelate  that  did 
so  many  glorious  acts  of  patriotism  for  retrieving  the  Hberties  and  independency 
of  his  country,  when  they  were  very  near  swallowed  up,  and  on  the  very  brink  of 
ruin,  by  the  encroachments  the  King  of  England,  the  mighty  Edward  I.  had 
made,  so  very  unjustly,  upon  a  free  people,  to  which  the  domestic  divisions  and 
animosities  of  contending  parties  had  not  a  little  contributed,  and  gave  him  the 
handle  to  form  his  project  of  subjecting  the  whole  kingdom  to  him,  as  their  Sove- 
reign and  Liege  Lord,  as  he  so  frequently  called  and  stiled  himself. 

Duncan  Earl  of  Fifie ;  this  was  Duncan  the  eleventh  Earl  of  Fife,  who  was  slain 
in  1298,  at  the  battle  of  Falkirk. 

Alexander  Cumine  Earl  of  Buchan,  the  same  who  was  Great  Justiciary  of  Scot- 
land, in  the  reign  of  King  Alexander  III.  but  he  died  in  the  1289,  which  weaken- 
ed, in  a  great  measure,  the  concord  that  was  formerly  among  the  great  men,  the 
Guardians. 

(_/)  Prynne's  History,  page  507. 
I 


ON  THE  RAGMAN-ROLL.  5 

Jmnes,  the  Great  Steward  of  Scotland,  lived  through  these  times  of  disorder  and 
confusion  that  ensued;  his  conduct  was  much  liker  the  willow  than  the  oak;  and 
died  in  the  1309.  His  son,  IFa/tcrus  Senescallus,  or  Steward  of  Scotland,  was  tlie 
father  of  Robert  IL  the  first  of  our  kings  of  the  most  serene  race  of  the  Stew- 
arts. 

Sir  John  Citmine  of  Badenoch,  senior,  was  the  last  in  the  commission  of  the  re- 
gency ;  he  was  the  ne.xt  to  the  rank  of  the  Cjrnites,  one  of  the  great  harones.  His 
family  was  the  root  and  stem  of  all  the  great,  numerous,  and  powerful  families  of 
the  Cumins.  Upon  the  death  of  the  yoimg  (;)iieen  Margaret  of  Scotland,  anno 
1290,  he  set  up  a  claim  for  the  crown;  his  compjtition  was  founded  and  derived 
from  a  very  remote  source,  fron  Bethock,  daughter  of  K.ing»Donald,  whose  daugh- 
ter, Hexilde,  was  married  to  Sir  William  Cumin,  Chamberlain  to  King  VVdliam  : 
but  the  claim  was  really  so  idle  that  he  soon  dropt  his  title,  and  laid  aside  his 
pretension  in  favour  of  John  B;iliol,  who,  to  say  the  truth,  had  the  hcredita/y 
right  to  the  cro.vn  been  as  fully  established  by  law  as  it  has  been  since,  no  question 
he  had  the  better  title  of  any  other  of  the  claimants.  He  left  issue  by  Marjory,  his 
wife,  daughter  of  John  Baliol  of  Harcourt,  sister  to  John  King  of  Scotland,  John 
Cumin  of  Badenoch,  who  was  slain  for  his  perfidy  and  treachery  by  King  Robert 
the  Bruce,  in  the  church  of  the  Minorites  at  Dumfries,  on  the  loth  of  February 
1306.  In  him  ended  the  great  family  of  the  Cumins  in  the  male  succession.  He 
left  a  daughter,  who  was  married  to  D  ividdc  S:,atbbol^y,  Earl  of  Athol,  who,  if  there 
be  any  that  can  lay  a  well-founded  claim  to  be  descended  of  this  lady,  they  are 
the  heirs  of  line  of  the  royal  race  of  the  Haliols,  and  the  heirs  in  blood  to  Margaret, 
the  eldest  daughter  of  David  Earl  of  Huntingdon,  the  root  of  the  roval  family  of 
Scotland,  that  failed  in  the  mascuHne  line  of  King  Alexander  IIL  The  ingenious 
Mr  David  Hume  of  Godscroft,  and  a  learned  polite  writer  in  every  thing  but  in 
that  of  history,  which  does  not  at  all  seem  to  have  been  his  talent,  has,  in  his  His- 
tory of  the  House  of  Douglas,  a  dissertation  on  the  right  of  the  family  of  Douglas, 
as  being  heirs  to  the  old  Baliol  family,  of  which  I  may  venture  to  say  there  is 
scarce  one  true  word. 

Our  author,  MrPrynne,  remarks, that  along  with  the  Guardians,  the  Custodes  Scotia, 
that  gave  their  oath  of  fealty  to  King  Edward  of  England  was  Brianus  filius  Allani, 
if  any  be  descended  of  him  I  can  say  nothing.  Then  Marcus  Sodoreruis  Episcopus, 
that  is  the  Bishop  of  the  Isles,  whom  my  author  says  was  "  ipsius  Regni  Cancel- 
"  larius,"  meaning  of  Scotland.  "  Ac  nobilis  vir  Robertus  de  Brus,  Dominns 
"  vallis  Annandie  :"  This  is  the  noble  person  who  competed  with  Baliol  for  the 
crown,  in  right  of  his  mother  Isabel,  the  second  daughter  of  David  Earl  of  Hunt- 
ingdon, grandfather  to  King  Robert  I.  Jjbannes  de  Baliol,  Dominus  Galuidie, 
This  is  that  John  Baliol  who  competed  for  the  crown,  and  actually  obtained  it  by 
the  determination  of  King  Edward  of  England,  anna  1292,  of  whom  our  histories 
are  so  full  that  I  cannot  think  it  necessary  to  add  any  thing  more  in  these  critical 
observations. 

Patricius  Dunbar  Comes  Marchie  ;  He  was  the  first  earl  of  the  old  noble  family  of 
the  Earls  of  Dunbar,  who  take  the  title  of  C.jnies  J^I  treble:  He,  at  this  time,  was  one 
of  the  claimants  for  the  crown  :  but  his  title  was  not  well  founded  ;  for  he  was 
only  come  of  a  natural  daughter  of  King  William,  and  was  more  for  show  than 
any  reality  that  could  be  in  his  claim.  From  him  the  great  and  noble  Earls  of 
March  descended,  till  they  were  attainted  in  Parliament,  in  the  reign  of  King 
James  I.  anno  1434  {k~). 

Dovenaldus  Comes  de  Mar  is  that  Earl  of  the  House  of  Marr  that  was  called  Grat- 
nack  or  Gratney,  the  import  of  which  I  do  not  know.  Donald  Earl  of  iVIarr,  his 
son,  was  one  of  the  Guardians  of  Scotland  in  the  nonage  of  King  David  II.  and 
was  slain  at  the  battle  of  Duplin  anno  1332.  In  Thomas  Earl  of  Marr  the  male 
line  of  the  family  failed,  and  it  came  to  Margaret  Countess  of  Douglas  and  Marr, 
his  sister,  and  to  James  Earl  of  Douglas,  her  son,  and  upon  his  de  nise  to  Isabel  Dou- 
glas, his  sister,  whose  husband,  on  her  resignation,  was  invested  in,  the  earldomof  Marr, 

(h)  Acts  of  Parliament. 

Vol.  IL  7  P 


6  HISTORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 

"  cinctus  gladio  comitas,"  as  the  ancient  custom  was ;  but  he  havhig  no  lawful 
issue,  he  surrendered  the  fee  of  the  earldom  to  Sir  Thomas  Stewart,  Comes,  Earl  of 
Garioch  his  son  ;  and  failing  his  heirs  male,  to  which  it  is  limited,  it  is  to  fall  to 
the  clown  {a),  which  actually  happened;  for  Thomas  Earl  of  Garioch,  the  fiar  of 
the  earldom,  died  before  his  own  father,  without  any  issue,  so  that  upon  the  Earl's 
death,  in  the  1436,  according  to  the  settlement  of  the  estate,  it  came  to  the  king; 
not  in  virtue  of  any  right,  as  is  pretended  by  some  of  our  historians,  as  being  de- 
scended in  blood  from  the  ancient  Earls  of  Marr,  whose  daughter  King  Robert 
the  Bruce  married,  but  because  the  descent  of  the  estate  in  the  limitation  of  tiie 
charter  earned  it  so.  I  beheve  that  Robett  Lord  Erskine  and  Robert  Lyle  of 
Duchall  were  heirs  of 'blood  and  line  to  Lady  Isabel  Douglas,  Countess  of  Mair: 
But  she  had  given  her  estate  to  her  husband,  Sir  Alexander  Stewart,  and  he  liad 
prtivided  it  to  the  crown  in  failure  of  the  issue  male  of  the  Earl  of  Garioch  his 
son,  which  happened,  as  we  have  said,  in  the  year  1436,  so  that  King  James  I. 
came  very  lawfully  and  legally  to  the  possession  of  the  earldom  of  Marr,  contrary 
to  what  is  asserted  by  some  of  our  historians :  But  I  will  carry  this  remark  no  fur- 
ther. 

Johannes  Comes  de  Buchan  :  This  was  the  next  great  family  of  the  Cumins  of  the 
House  of  Batlenoch,  he  was  Constable  of  Scotland,  and  Jasticiarius  Galuidie.  He 
was  inflexibly  attached  to  the  English  interest  in  the  time  of  King  Robert  the 
Bruce,  and  strenuously  opposed  all  the  struggles  he  made  for  recovering  the  liber- 
ties of  his  country  ;  for  which  he  lost  his  estate  in  Scotland,  and  brought  ruin  oq 
his  family,  and  died  a  banished  man  in  England. 

Johannes  Comes  Atholie  is  the  next  in  the  list.  This  noble  Earl,  though  he  had 
been  in  the  English  interest,  yet  he  was  one  of  the  few  of  the  nobihty  who  joined 
King  Robert  the  Bruce,  when  he  set  the  crown  on  his  head  in  the  1306.  But  in 
the  course  of  the  war,  falling  into  the  hands  of  the  enemy,  he  was  by  order  of 
the  king  of  England  sent  prisoner  to  England  ;  and  though,  it  is  remarkable,  he 
was  of  the  blood  royal,  and  allied  to  the  English  Monarch  himself,  yet  so  inex- 
orably was  he  set  on  rage,  to  revenge  any  attempt  a  Scotsman,  of  whatsoever  qua- 
lity, that  durst  attempt  any  thing  to  controul  his  conquest  over  Scotland,  that  he 
ordered  him  to  be  executed  with  the  rest  of  the  prisoners.  All  the  favour  he  had, 
if  it  was  a  favour  at  all,  was,  he  was  prefeired  to  a  higher  gallows  than  any  of  his 
countrymen  ;  so  it  may  be  well  said  he  died  a  martyr  for  his  country  and  the  li- 
berties thereof.  His  son,  David  de  Strathbolgy  Earl  of  Athol,  was  once  in  high  fa- 
vour with  King  Robert,  who  made  him  High  Constable  of  Scotland  ;  but  after 
that,  in  the  1312,  he  revolted  to  the  English,  and  was  a  strenuous  and  indefatigable 
worker  of  all  the  michief  to  his  country  that  ever  fell  in  his  way,  or  was  in  his 
power :  so  his  family  was  forfaulted,  and  the  earldom  of  Athol  was  given  to  Sir 
William  Douglas  Lord  of  Liddisdale. 

After  the  Earl  of  Athol,  the  next  in  the  roll  is  Gilbertus  Comes  de  An^us;  he  was 
an  Englishmen  of  the  surname  of  Umfraville ;  he  was  forfeited  and  lost  his  estate 
in  Scotland  by  an  article  of  the  peace  concluded  with  England  a7mo  1327.  It 
was  agreed  that  no  Englishman  should  henceforth  possess  any  lands  in  Scotland, 
but  such  as  should  reside  in  that  kingdom,  and  renounce  their  allegiance  to  the 
crown  of  England  ;  by  which  all  the  Scots  in  the  English  interest  were  for  ever 
exiled :  and  then  king  Robert,  to  reward  the  merit  of  one  of  his  own  loyal  and 
well-deserving  subjects.  Sir  Alexander  Stewart  of  Bonkill,  gave  to  him  the  earl- 
dom and  honour  of  Earl  of  Angus. 

Malcolmes  Comes  de  Levenax  or  Lenax.  The  first  ancestor  of  the  family  of  Len- 
nox I  find  from  any  voucher  of  authority  that  1  could  well  depend  on  was,  Ayk- 
frith  or  Egfrith,  an  Enghsh  Saxon  Lord,  cotemporary  with  King  Canute  and 
Edward  the  Confessor,  was  Lord  of  Dent  Sadbergh.  &-c.  in  Yorkshire  (bj,  he  was 
also  seigneur  of  the  baronies  of  Askrig,  Holtby,  Marnck,  Burgh,  llkton,  Newton, 
Tanfield,  Wath,  Melmerby,  Normanby,  &-c.  all  in  the  same  county  (c).  He  died  pro- 


ber in  the  register  of  King  James  I.      (i)  Thoresby  Ducatus  Leodiensis,  page  71.      (f)  Extra, 
ulgo  vocat.  Domesday  Book,  in  Registro  Honoris  de  Riclmiond,  Appendix  page  57. 


ON  THE  RAGMAN-ROLL.  ; 

bably  in  t!ie  latter  end  of  EJwaid  the  Confessor,  anno  1065,  and  was  succeeded  by 
his  eldest  son 

Arkyll  or  Arkill  (c).  Chevalier,  as  he  is  called  in  old  records  (d),  he  was  posses- 
S3r  not  only  of  the  above  baronies,  but  also  of  the  lands  of  Hackforth,  Hornby, 
Laybrun,  Brumpton,  Cathorp,  &.c.  (e).  He  had  also  a  very  great  estate  in  Nor- 
thumberland, beuig  called  by  Otdcricus  I'itiiH;,  a  cotemporary  writer,  the  most 
powerful  man  in  Northumberland,  &.c.  "  Arkyllus  Nordanhymbrorum  potcntissimus 
"  cum  rege  concordiam  fecit,  cique  tilium  suum  obsidem  tradidit(y}."  He  married 
Sigrida,  daughter  to  a  powerful  baron  in  Yorkshire,  Kilveitftlius  Li^^ti/fi,  by  Ecfnda 
his  wite,  daughter  toAldwinus,  Bishop  of  Durham;  for  the  celibacy  of  the  clergy  had 
not  then  obtained  either  in  England  or  among  us  (j^).  By  her  he  had,  first,  Cospa- 
trick,  who  married  the  daughter  oi  D'llpbinus  Jilius  Tor/mi,  by  whom  he  had  a  son, 
Cvjspatrick,  who  was  cotemporary  with  Simeon  Dunelmensis.  His  posterity  probably 
ended  in  an  heir-female,  to  whom  Monsieur  Adjin  de  Stavelay  was  heir  (/>).  Arkyll, 
after  he  had  fought  stoutlv  for  two  years  for  the  honour,  liberties,  and  indepen- 
dency of  his  country  against  William  the  Conqueror,  was  constrained  at  last,  in 
the  beginnmg  of  tiie  year  1068,  to  submit  to  that  victorious  prmce,  and  gave  up 
his  son,  Cospatrick,  as  an  hostage  for  his  fidelity,  who  being  young,  was  not  con- 
cerned in  the  rebellion  of  his  father,  by  which  means  he  kept  a  good  deal  of  his 
father's  estate  («'),  who  was  forfeited  and  banished  the  latter  end  of  that  year  up- 
on the  suppression  of  the  Yorkshire  Insurrection,  in  which  he  bore  a  considerable 
share,  as  is  mentioned  by  the  above  cited  Oid,-riciis  lltalis.  "  Eeodem  tamen  an- 
"  no,  Arkyllus  inter  rebelles  fuit  Eboracenses,  quibus  profligatis,  a  conquestore  in 
"  exilium  actus  est  (k)."  Upon  his  defeat  in  England,  he,  with  many  other  great 
men  who  had  opposed  the  conquest,  fled  to  Scotland  to  King  Malcolm  111.  who 
that  very  year  having  married  Margaret,  sister  to  Edgar  Atheling,  the  true  and  li 
neal  heir  of  the  English  crown,  received  all  the  Saxon  exiles  with  open  arms,  gave 
them  estates  in  Scotland,  and  other  rewards  suitable  to  their  birth  and  merit,  of 
which  our  Arkyll  had  his  share.  It  is  uncertain  at  what  time  this  great  man  died; 
but  it  is  very  clear  and  evident  he  was  succeeded  in  his  Scots  estate  by  his  son 
Alwjne,  or  as  he  is  designed  in  our  most  ancient  and  earliest  vouchers,  Alwynin 
Mncarkyll,  or,  Alwynus  fiUus  Arkyll  (/) :  he  appears  soon  in  the  reign  of  King'Da- 
vid,  being  witness  with  Constantinus  Cotn^s  de  Fyfe,  in  a  confirmation  by  King  Da- 
vid to  the  monastery  of  Dunfermline,  which  behoved  to  be  before  the  1128,  that 
his  son  Earl  Gilemichael  is  that  year  witness  to  the  foundation  of  the  abbey  of 
Holyroodhouse,  Abbatia  Sancte  Crucis  d;  Edinburc  (;«}.  He  is  also  witness  to  very 
many  ot  the  royal  charters  by  King  Malcolm  IV.  and  was  seemingly  in  the  same 
high  degree  of  favour  he  had  been  with  this  king's  grandfather.  He  seems  to  be 
in  a  good  degree  of  confidence  with  Kmg  William  the  Lyon ;  but  the  truth  is,  I 
cannot  precisely  determine  whether  it  was  by  King  Malcolm  IV.  or  his  brother 
King  William,  that  he  had  the  large  and  far  extended  territory  of  the  Levenax  or 
Lennox  erected  into  a  comital  dignity;  yet  sure  we  are,  that  if  it  was  not  by  King 
Malcolm,  it  was  very  early  in  the  reign  of  King  William,  who  came  to  the  throne 
in  1 1 65  :  it  is  as  uncertain  the  time  of  his  demise;  but  it  has  bee  soon  after  his 
creation  to  be  Comes  de  Levenax.  He  left  behind  him  two  sons,  Alwiiie,  his  succes- 
sor in  the  earldom,  and  Eth,  or  Etbus,  as  it  is  rendered  in  English  Hugh,  who  is 
witness  in  a  charter  of  the  lands  of  Meybotbel  in  Carrick,  granted  by  Dtincinus 
filius  Gilbertii  filii  Fergusii,  who  himself  was  afterwards  Comes  de  Cunick,  to  the 
Monks  of  Melrose  («) ;  although  this  charter  has  no  precise  date,  yet,  by  the  Chro- 
nicon  de  Melross,  it  appears  to  be  in  the  1193  (■)  As  to  the  posterity  of  this  Elh, 
I  have  found  nothing  certain,  unless  Dovenald  U  fitzMich.iel  Mire  de  Levenax,  after- 
wards mentioned  in  this  roll,  be  come  of  him;  but  this  we  olfer  as  a  conjecture,  and 
no  more. 

(f)  Extra,  ex  libra  vulgo  vocat.  Domesday  book,  in  Registro  Honoris  de  Richmond,  appendix  page  57. 
(</)  Ibidem,  (f)  Es  libra  Doomsday.  (/)  Ordericus  Vitalis  ad  annum  1068,  Historic  Normann. 
Scriptores  page  511.  {g)  Simeon  Dunelmensis,  page  80.  (h)  Registrum  honoris  de  Richmond,  appen- 
dix, page  61.  (/)  Extra,  ex  libro  Doomsday.  (i)  Ordericus  Vitalis  ubi  supra,  page  513,  ac  Simeon 
Dunelmensis,  ut  supra,  page  82.  (/)  Chartul.  of  Dunfermline,  and  the  most  of  the  other  chartularies, 
and  royal  deeds  and  grants  of  King  David  I.  {m\  Chrunicon  Sanct«  Crucis  de  EJin.  in  Wharton's  An- 
gla  Sacra.     C)  Autographum  penes  Comitcm  de  i\Ijrton.     (0)  Chron.  de  IVlelross,  page  lyy. 

3 


S  fflSTORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 

Allulne,  the  son  and  heir  of  the  former  Allwine  Comes  de  Levenax  («),  must  have 
been  very  young  at  the  death  of  his  father,  for  his  ward  was  in  the  crown,  and  given 
by  King  Wilham  to  his  brother  David  Earl  of  Huntingdon  and  Garioch;  for,  in  a 
deed  of  inquisition  concerning  the  \?inds  oi  Monach-Kenneran,  super  amnem  de  Clyde, 
dated  1233,  the  monks  of  Paisley  prove,  by  several  witnesses,  tliat  their  monastery 
was  in  possession  of  these  lands,  "  eo  tempore,  quo  David  Comes,  frater  regis  Wil- 
"  lielmi,  habuitetposseditcomitatum  de  Levenax  {b);"  which  can  be  constructed  no 
other  than  that  by  the  feudal  law  he  had  the  ward  ot  the  young  earl  at  the  time,  till 
he  came  to  full  age.  This  noble  ancient  Earl  Alluine,  designed_yj/w  AUuini  ConiUis  de 
Levenax,  left  a  most  numerous  progeny  of  sons ;  but  his  lady's  name  I  have  not  been 
able  to  trace  out,  of  whom  I  shall  treat  in  order  of  their  primogeniture,  as  far  at 
least  as  can  be  guessed  by  their  precedency  in  witnessing  charters,  and  other  pro- 
bable conjectures :  but  we  are  sure  his  eldest  son,  and  the  heir  of  the  family  of 
Lennox,  was 

I.  Malduin ;  of  whom  and  his  posterity  more  hereafter. 

IL  Duffxulliis,  or  Dugallus,  who  was  Rector  of  the  church  of  Kilpatrick  (^cj  j 
but  being  a  churchman  he  left  no  issue. 

III.  Malcolm,  who  got  of  the  family  the  lands  of  Campsie,  a  part  of  the  earl- 
dom of  Lennox  in  patrimony  (dj.  He  had  only  one  son,  Finlay,  commonly  de- 
signed Finlayus  de  Campsie,  and  Finlaitsfilius  Malcolmi  (f).  This  Finlay  had  only 
three  daughters  who  were  co-heirs  to  him,  as  well  as  they  are  found  heirs  to  their 
great  uncle  the  above  Dugall,  Rector  de  Kilpatrick  {fy,  first,  Mary,  who  was  mar- 
ried to  Johannes  de  Warderoba;  second,  Elena  to  Bernardus  de  Erth ;  third,  For- 
veleth  to  Norinus  de  Monorgund  {g). 

IV.  Amclick,  who  is,  in  old  writs,  called  Havel,  Hamelin,  or  Amelick  {b),  who  got 
from  the  family  as  a  portion,  the  lands  of  Rosneath,  in  the  earldom  of  Lennox, 
and  gave  the  church  thereof  in  "  liberam,  puram,  et  perpetuam  eleemosynam," 
to  the  abbacy  of  Paisley  (/).  He  left  two  sons,  Duncan  and  Amelick,  filiiis  Amelick, 
vales,  and,  in  old  deeds,  designed  Amelick,  junior,  to  distinguish  him  from  his  fa- 
ther {k) :  but  we  cannot  trace  their  posterity ;  for  the  lands  of  Rosneath,  not  long 
after  this,  came  to  the  Earls  of  Monteith,  "  et  Maria  Comitissa  de  Monteith"  is 
in  possession  of  them  in  the  beginning  of  the  reign  of  King  David  Bruce. 

V.  Gilchrist,  who  obtained  in  patrimony  from  Malduin  Earl  of  Lennox,  his  bro- 
ther, the  lands  of  Arroquhar  in  the  upper  part  of  the  earldom  of  Lennox  (/),  and 
was  the  ancestor  to  the  Laird  of  Macfarlane  ;  of  him  more  will  be  said  hereafter, 
as  also  of  his  posterity,  who  are  now,  for  ought  that  yet  appears,  the  only  remain- 
ing branch  of  this  once  great  and  flourishing  family. 

VI.  Diincanus,  whom  1  have  found  witness  in  a  charter  granted  by  his  brother, 
"  Maldoneus  Comes  de  Levenax,  Umphredo  de  Kilpatrick,  de  tota  terra  de  Colqu- 
"  houn  {"')." 

VII.  Henricus,  who  is  witness  in  a  charter,  whereby  his  brother.  Earl  Malduin, 
gave  to  "  Gilmore  filio  Maldonei,  illam  terram  quae  dicitur  Luss  («)." 

VIII.  Cbristiniis,  who  is  a  frequent  witness  to  his  brother  Earl  Malduin's  char- 
ters, particularly  of  one  granted  by  him,  "  Mauritio  filio  Galbreth,  de  tota  Carru- 
"  cata  terraj  de  Cartonvenach  (0)."  These  three  last  brothers  had  no  posterity 
that  we  read  of.  Earl  Alluin's  only  daughter,  Eva,  was  married  to  Malcolm,  the 
son  of  Duncan,  Thane  of  Callendar,  with  whom  he  got  from  her  brother  the  baro- 
ny of  Kilinsytb,  in  the  earldom  of  Lennox,  now  the  estate  of  Kilsyth,  in  the  shire 
of  Stiriing  {p). 

To  this  Earl  succeeded  his  eldest  son 

Malduin,  or  Maldoneus,  or  Maldwine  Comes  de  Lennox,  the  third  earl  of  the  line, 
about  the  end  of  the  reign  of  King  William.     He  was  a  great  ben^efactor  to  the 


(17)  Cliartulary  of  Glasgow,  in  the  custody  of  the  Faculty  of  the  University  of  Glasgow,  (i)  Chart. 
of  Paisley,  (f)  Chartulary  of  Paisley  inquisitio,  ad  annum  i  271.  (</)  Ibicitm.  (f)  Ibidem,  and  the 
chartulary  of  Lennox.  (/)  Chart,  of  Paisley.  {g)  Ibidem,  as  appears  from  different  charters  there. 
(A)  Ibidem,  and  the  chartulary  of  Lennox.  {i)  Ibidem,  ad  annum  1226.  (/')  Ibidem.  (/)  Charts 
penes  Waltenim  Macfarlane,  de  ecdcm,  ac  etiam  charta  in  publicis  archivis.  (m)  Chartulary  of  Len- 
nox, page  22,  and  92.  (n)  Ibidem,  page  25,  (0)  Ibidem,  page  65.  (/>),The  original  was  in  the  cus- 
iody  of  the  late  Viscount  of  Kilsyth. 


ON  THE  RAGMAN-ROLL.  c 

See  of  Glasgow,  and  abbacies  of  Paisley,  Arbroath,  and  Kelio  (a).  The  last  men- 
tion that  1  have  found  of  hi;n  is  in  the  1250.  He  married  Elizabeth,  daughter  of 
Walter  Lord  Hi^;h  Steward  of  Scotland,  ancestor  to  the  royal  family  of  Stewart  (i); 
by  whom  he  hid  only  one  son,  Malcolm,  /i/w  Maldwini  Comitis,  Lord  of  the  Len- 
nox, who  died  before  his  father  anno  124S  C^J  ;  and  so  was  never  Comes  de  Leve- 
nox,  but  was  father  to  Malcolm  IL  of  that  name,  and  the  fourth  Earl  of  Lennox. 
He  obtained  a  charter  from  King  Alexander  IIL  erecting  to  him  and  his  heirs  a 
large  tract  of  grouird  in  liheram  H'^aiennam,  a  free  forestry,  dated  "  apud  Kyntore, 
"  anno  1272,  sexto  die  Julii  (dj."  He  is  freq^uently  mentioned  in  the  second 
volume  of  the  Fvedsra,  anno  1284  (f).  He  died  probably  in  or  about  I28q,  and 
was  succeeded  by  his  only  son 

Malcolm,  the  third  of  that  name,  and  the  fifth  Earl  of  Lennox,  who  was  the 
faithful  Achates  of  King  Robert  L  and  had  the  honour  to  srick  firm  to  his  master 
in  all  the  adverse  fortunes  that  befel  him,  when  all  his  other  subjects  deserted 
bim.  Sir  Gilbert  Hay  and  Sir  James  Douglas  only  excepted.  He  was  one  of  the 
Scots  earls  who  invaded  England  in  1297  (/) ;  and,  after  a  great  many  dangers  he 
had  undergone  in  defeiice  of  his  country,  he  was  at  last  slain  fighting  gloriously 
in  the  defeixe  of  the  liberties  thereof,  at  the  battle  of  Halidonhill,  near  Berwick, 
July  19.  1333  {j).     He  was  succeeded  by  his  son 

Donaldus,  Comes  de  Lennox,  who  is  one  of  the  Comites  et  Magnates  Scotia,  wha 
grant  a  commission  to  divers  plenipotentiaries  to  treat  anent  the  ransom  of  King 
David  n.  anno  1357  (/>).     He  died  in  1372. 

This  Donald  Earl  ot  Lennox  was  the  first  instance  that  I  have  ever  observed  that 
broke  in  upon  the  old  feudal  constitution,  and  altered  the  succession,  if  it  was 
never  so  remote,  from  an  heir-male  to  an  heir  of  line  and  at  law ;  for  he  altered 
the  ancient  investitures  of  his  estate,  that  from  the  beginning  of  our  law  had  been 
\miformly  limited  to  heirs-male  of  him  that  first  received  the  feu  ;  and,  instead  of 
suffering  his  estate  and  the  honour,  for  these  at  that  time  were  inseparable,  to  go 
in  the  ancient  channel  to  his  cousin  and  nearest  heir-male,  Malcolm  Macfarlane  of 
Arroquhar,  the  ancestor  of  the  Laird  of  Macfarlane,  he  settled  it  on  his  daughter, 
Margaret,  and  Walter,  the  son  of  Allan  of  Foscelyne,  her  husband,  and  their 
heirs;  which  accordingly  Duncan  Earl  of  Lennox  enjoyed,  who  was  their  son,  till 
he  was  attainted,  and  suffered,  as  in  cases  of  treason,  for  being  accessory  to  the 
treason  of  the  Duke  of  Albany,  his  son-in-law,  in  1427  :  so  the  heir-male  of  the 
most  ancient  race  of  the  Earls  of  Lennox  is  Walter  Macfarlane  of  that  Ilk  ;  and, 
as  such,  wears  the  principal  arms  of  the  family,  the  cross  ingrailed  betwixt  the- 
four  roses. 

The  next  great  man  that  made  his  submission  in  the  Ragman-Rol!,  is  IValterus 
Comes  de  Monteith,  who  was  a  Stewart  by  blood,  and  brother  to  the  Great  Steward 
of  Scotland,  and  came  to  be  C-^mes  de  Monteith,  in  right  of  a  lady  the  heiress,  his 
wife.  He  left  the  surname  of  Stewart,  and  his  sons  assumed  the  name  of  Mon- 
teith, and  were  spread  into  seveial  noble  branches  as  the  Monteiths  of  Rusky,  and 
the  Monteiths  Lords  of  Arran,  Dominiis  de  Arran  li  Knapdale(i),  as  we  see  them  de- 
signed. The  race  of  those  Earls  ended  in  an  heir-female,  who  married  Sir  John 
Graham,  who  thereby  became  Earl  of  Monteith.  He  was  executed  in  England 
after  the  battle  of  Durham,  by  a  special  commission  from  the  crown  of  England 
for  that  effect  (k),  anno  1346.  By  his  heir-female  the  earldom  came  to  Robert 
Stewart,  the  second  son  of  King  Robert  IL  who,  upon  that,  was  Comes  de  Monteith, 
after  that  Earl  of  Fife,  and  then  Duke  of  Albany.  He  was  regent  during  the 
captivity  of  King  Jamc:  L  from  the  1406,  till  his  own  death  1419. 

Oi  Johannes  Cumine,  Dominus  de  Bndenoch,  and  Jacobus  Senescalh/s  Sootier,  we 
have  already  treated. 


(a)  Chartularies  of  Glasgow,  Paisley,  and  Arbroatli.  (i)  aiartulary  of  Paisley.  (f)  Autogra- 
phum  peues-Ducem  de  Montrose,  (i/)  Chartulary  of  L'^nnox.  (c)  Rymer,  ut  supia.  (/)  Walsing- 
liara,"  Matthew  Westminster  and  Henry  Knighton.  (/)  Henricus  de  Knighton,  inter  decern  scriptore" 
Anglia:.     (A)  Rymer,  tcm.  6.  p.  43.     (/)  In  the  Registers,     (f)  Focdera  Angliie. 


Vol.  IL  7  Q^ 


10  HISTORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 

Next  to  them  is  recorded  J'VUUelmus  de  Soiilis,  and  Joj^nnes  de  Soiilis.  I  take 
them  to  be  brothers;  the  eldest,  WilHam,  is  Dominus  de  Lydisdale;  they  were  great 
men  in  the  south  ;  but  inflexibly  all  attaclied  to  the  English  side,  for  which  they 
lost  their  estate,  that,  by  gift  and  donation  of  the  crowji,  came  to  Sir  William 
Douglas,  son  to  Sir  James  Douglas  de  Laudonia,  of  whom  our  histories  are  full, 
by  the  designation  of  Dmiinus  Fallis  de  Lydal;  and,  for  his  bravery,  distinguished 
by  the  title  of  the  Flower  of  Chivalry. 

Willielmiu  de  Sancto  Claro\  I  take  this  gentleman  to  be  a  branch  of  the  Sinclairs: 
but  neither  the  families  of  Roslin  nor  Kermiston. 

Radulpbusde  Hauden,  i.  e.  Haldane,  orHaden,  of  that  Ilk,  was  a  very  ancient  fa- 
mily in  Teviotdale,  now  extinct.  The  heir  of  line  was  married  to  John  Haldane 
of  Lanrick.  Gleneaglesis  very  justly  reputed  an  ancient  funily;  they  have  a  char- 
tei;  from  King  William,  "  Rogero  de  Hauden,  de  tota  terra  de  Frandie  in  Glen- 
"  dovan,  per  rectas  divisas  suas,  in  feodo  &■  h;';veditate.  Testibus  Mattheo  Epis- 
"  copo  Aberdonen.  Comite  Duncano,  Comite  Gdberto,  Ricardo  de  Preb;nda,  Phi- 
"  lippo  de  Valoniis  Camerario  meo,  Willielmo  Cumine,  Johanne  de  H:isting,  Ma- 
"  lisio  fratre  Comitis  Gilbert!,  Malcoimo  filio  Comitis  Duncani,  ^A'illieimo  de 
"  Valens,  David  de  Hayia,  Alexandre  filio  Thori,  apud  Clacmanan."  The  family 
rose  gradually  to  be  one  of  the  most  considerable  in  the  kingdom,  chiefly  by  mar- 
riage. Sir  Smion,  one  of  the  heads  of  the  family,  got  an  estate  in  Perthshire,  by  the 
marriage  of  a  lady,  who  was  named  Matilda  de  Arnoits,  L  e.  Arnot.  In  little  more 
than  a  century  after  that,  Jolm  Haldane,  son  and  heir  apparent  of  Sir  Bernard 
Haldane  of  Gleneagies,  got  tlie  fourth  part  of  the  earldom  of  Lennox,  by  the 
marriage  of  Agnes  Monteith,  daughter  and  co-heir  of  Robert  Monteith  of  Rusky, 
:ind  of  Elizabeth,  one  of  the  daughters  of  Duncan,  the  last  of  the  race  of  the  Earls 
of  Lennox.  He  was  in  high  favour  with  James  III.  who  gave  him  charters  of  a 
part  of  the  earldom  of  Lennox,  with  some  specialties,  intimating,  that  his  lady. 
Dame  Agnes  Monteith,  was  a  co-heir  to  her  grandfather,  as  I  apprehend.  He  was 
sent  ambassador  to  the  crown  of  Denmark ;  he  was  sheriff-principal  of  the  shire  of 
Edinburgh;  and,  in  the  1482,  with  George  Lord  Seaton,  Alexander  Ramsay  of 
Dalhousie,  and  Robert  Logan  of  Restalrig,  are  made  joint  captains,  chieftains, 
keepers,  and  governors  of  the  town- of  Berwick,  and  to  defend  it  against  the  in- 
vasion of  our  old  enemies  of  England.  James  Haldane  of  Gleneagies,  his  son,  in 
the  1 8th  of  King  James  IV.  is  made  Keeper  of  the  King's  Castle  of  Dunbar,  and 
is  allowed  to  take  out  brieves  from  the  Chancery,  for  serving  him  as  one  of  the 
heirs  of  Duncan  Earl  of  Lennox,  1473.  He  had  a  long  and  tedious  suit  at  law 
with  the  Lord  Darnly  anent  the  superiority  of  the  Earldom  of  Lennox  ;  and 
when  these  disputes  came  to  be  settled  and  adjusted,  then  he  assumed  the  quarter- 
ed coat  of  the  House  of  Lennox  and  Monteith,  in  the  second  and  third  quarter  of 
his  achievement,  which  is  still  borne  by  his  lineal  heir  Mungo  Haldane  of  Glen- 
eagies without  a^y  variation. 

In  the  same  deed  of  submission  there  is  Pntricius  Graham,  who  is  the  head  of  the 
Kincardine  family,  the  illustrious  ancestor  of  his  Grace  the  Duke  of  Montrose,  who 
were  raised  to  be  Earls  of  Montrose  by  King  James  IV.  in  1505,  Marquis  by  King 
Charles  1.  in  the  1644,  and  Duke  by  Queen  Anne  in  the  1706. 

After  Fatricius  de  Graham  there  is  Thomas  Randulphi;  this  is  that  great  patriot 
Sir  Thomas  Randolph,  nephew  to  King  Pvobert  I.  by  whom  he  was  afterwards  me- 
ritoriously raised  to  the  dignity  of  Earl  of  Murray,  Lord  of  Annandale,  and  of  the 
Isle  of  Man,  whom  all  Scots  historians,  ancient  and  modern,  extol  above  all  others, 
for  warlike  honour  and  glory,  next  to  King  Robert  himself.  He  died  Governor  of 
Scotland  in  the  minority  of  King  David  II.  anno  1331.  The  historians  seem  to 
have  an  emulation,  and  vie  with  one  another  who  can  do  most  honour  to  the  va- 
liant and  ever  renowned  Earl  of  Murray,  and  transmit  his  fame  to  posterity,  with 
the  praise  and  merit  he  so  highly  deserved.  His  son,  John  Earl  of  Murray,  a  hero 
like  himself,  was  slain  at  the  battle  of  Durham,  anno  1^46,  with  this  circumstance 
of  regret,  that  he  left  no  issue  to  inherit  the  virtues  of  their  noble  progenitors, 
from  whom  they  derived  so  much  honour  along  with  their  blood. 

Alexander  de  Baliollo  Camerarius  Scotiae,  in  the  same  roll  of  fealty.  He  was 
Baron  of  the  barony  of  Cavers  in  Teviotdale.     He  was  a  son  of  the  Baliol  family, 


ON  THE  JIAGMAN-ROLL.    '  ii 

♦ 

■  and  i-;  designed  Baron  of  Cavei-s  in  many  authentic  voucliers  in  Rynier  and  the 
chartnlaries,  as  may  be  seen  by  more  vouchers  in  the  Life  of  Alexander  BuHol  o;' 
Cavers,  Chamberlain  of  Scotland,  in  the  Lives  of  the  Ollkers  of  State,  p.  266. 

Johannes  Sinescalli;  this  is  John  Stewart  of  Bonkill,  and  in  other  places  of  this 
record,  where  he  made  his  submission  to  the  King  of  England,  frater  germanus 
Jacobi  Senesc'/l/i  Scotiae. 

IVilliehniis  C'lmine,  who  is  of  Kilbride,  in  Lanarkshire,  whose  son,  John  Cumin, 
was  forfeited  for  adhering  to  the  English,  and  the  barony  of  Kilbride  was  given 
by  King  Robert  L  to  his  grandson  Robert,  Steward  of  Scotland,  afterwards  King- 
Robert  11.  Robert  in.  in  the  1404,  gave  the  barony  of  Kilbride,  JaccM  Senes- 
callo  filio  suo.naturali,  who  is  designed  D'lminus  dc  Kilhrydc,  in  several  charters  and 
other  deeds  I  have  seen,  to  which  his  seal  is  set,  the  lion  of  Scotland,  within  the 
ttessure,  as  in  the  royal  bearing,  within  a  bordure  cheque  of  the  Stewarts  (;'/). 
His  issue  failing,  the  lands  fell  back  to  the  crown,  and  became  a  part  of  the  prin- 
cipality. 

Ingelrrimus  de  Umphravlh  was  a  branch  of  the  Umfraville  family  that  were 
Englishmen,  but  possessed  of  a  great  estate  in  Angus,  and  elsewhere,- which  they 
lost,  because  they  would  not  renounce  their  allegiance  to  England,  and  turn  honest 
Eicotsmen.  In  the  rolls  of  King  Robert  1.  there  are  charters  of  land  granted  by 
that  prince,  upon  the  narrative,  that  the  lands  had  formerly  belonged,  and  forfeited 
to  the  crown,  by  the  attainder  of  Ingelramus  de  Umphravile. 

IWliehmis  de  Moravia  de  Tollybardine;  this  is  the  ancestor  of  the  House  of  Tul- 
libardin,  now  arrived  to  the  dignity  of  the  dukedom.of  Athol;  of  whom  already 
in  these  remarks. 

Radulphus  de  Craijufordex  this  is  the  same  gentleman  whom  we  find  in  another 
place  of  this  record  intitled,  Reginaldus  de  Crawford,  del  Cjiite  de  Air,  and  who  is 
Vicecomes  de  Air.  "He  was  the  head  of  the  great  and  ancient  family  of  the  Craw- 
furds  of  Loudon,  whose  ancestor,  Reginaldus  de  Crawford  Vicecomes  de  Air,  anno 
:tZ20,  was  the  first  of  the  name  who  was  bavon  of  the  barony  of  Loudon,  which  he 
j>rocured  by  the  heiress  of  Jacobus  de  Loudon,  in  the  reign  of  Alexander  11.  or  may 
he  sooner. 

Hugh  de  Crawford,  his  eldest  son,  is  designed  Hugo  fdius  Rcginaldi  de  Crawford, 
who,  with  his  father  and  other  great  persons,  is  witness  tg  the  charter  by  "  Wal- 
"  terus  Senescallus  ScotifE,  Deo  &-  Beat:e  Maria?  de  DalmuUin,  de  terris  &•  pastura 
"  de  Druraelly."  He  had  also,  by  the  grant  of  "  Allanus  filius  RoUandi  de  Ga- 
*'  louyeia,  pro  horaagio  et  servitio  suo  terras  de  Monoch  per  divisas  suas,"  which 
is  ratified  by  a  charter  of  King  Alexander  II.  "  apud  Cadichow,  ultimo  die  Mali 
"  anno  legni  nostri  duodecimo,"  i.  e.  1226  (^b).  The  same  Hugo  de  Crawford  is  one 
of  the  Magnates  et  Barones  Scotiae  who  put  themselves  into  the  protection  of  the 
King  of  England,  in  the  commotions  that  then  happened,  1255.  He  had  ano- 
ther charter  from  the  great  Constable  his  superior,  "  de  tota  terra  de  Crosby," 
which  is  still  enjoyed  by  his  descendants  the  Crawfurds  of  Auchinames  (c). 

To  this  first  Hugo  de  Crawford  succeeded  his  son  the  next  B/iro  de  Loudon,  who 
is  de';igned  Hugo  de  Craizford,  filius  Hugonis  d^  Crawford.,  when  he  gives  by  his 
charter,  "  Reginaldo  fratri  suo  certas  terras,  quas  ille  tenuit  de  Domino  Rogero 
<'  Comite  Wintonie."  He,  Hugo  de  Crawford,  settled  a  contest  with  the  Abbot  of 
Kelsa,  "  cum  consensu  Alicie  sponsas  sure,"  to  which  he,  Dominus  Hugo,  appends 
his  seal ;  and  because  Reginald,  his  son,  had  not  a  seal  of  his  own,  he  uses  the  seal 
Domini  Simonis  Fraser,  anno  1271  (^/).  He,  Reginaldus  de  Crawford,  was  l^icecomes 
de  Air,  in  the  competition  for  the  crown  betwixt  the  Bruce  and  the  Baliol;  and 
when  matters  came  to  a  crisis,  in  the  event  of  that  contest,  no  Scotsman  ever 
acted  the  part  more  of  a  firm  and  inflexible  patriot  than  Sir  Reginald  Crawfurd, 
or  was  more  firm  in  asserting,  with  zeal  and  intrepid  courage,  the  liberties  of  his 
country;  so  that  he  was  an  eye-sore  to  the  English,  and  all  that  were  in  their 
interest  through  the  west.  True  it  is,  that  at  the  first  breaking  out  of  the  war, 
he  was  carried  down  with  the  stream  of  complying  with  England,  and  gave  his 

(fl)  In  the  hands  of  the  Laird  of  Eamock.  (^b)  Penes  Comitem  de  Loudon,  (f)  Ibidem,  {fl")  Char- 
tulary  of  Kelso. 


12  HISTORICAL  AND  GRlflCAL  REMARKS 

oatli  oi"  fidelity,  as  most  others  did,  to  the  victorious  King  Edward ;  but  honestlv- 
apprehending  that  obligation  to  be  of  no  force,  he  joined  with  the  very  first  oi' 
those  v-'orthy  patribts  who  set  up  to  recover  and  redeem  their  sinking  liberties. 
The  general  ol'  the  English  forces  pretending  and  suing  for  a  truce,  it  was  inti- 
mated to  Sir  Reginald  Crawfurd;  he  and  his  friends,  suspecting  no  treachery,  since 
they  had  all  the  assurances  the  faith  of  man  could  give  for  their  security.  The 
Barns  at  Ayr  was  the  place  of  meeting;  but  he  was  no  sooner  entered  mto 
the  place,  than,  without  so  much  as  the  form  of  justice,  he  and  Sir  Allan  Mont- 
gomery were  presently  put  to  death,  and  executed  as  traitors  to  the  King  of 
England;  tiiis  was  in  the  year  1297.  He  left  a  son  and  heir,  named  Sir  Ronald, 
or  Reginald,  called  Sir  Ronald  the  younger,  who  was  just  such  another  patriot  for 
the  defence  of  the  liberties  of  his  distressed  country  as  his  father  had  been.  He 
was  among  the  first  of  his  countrymen  who  joined  Sir  William  Wallace,  and  was 
with  him  in  all  the  dangers  he  was  expo«ed  to,  till  he  laid  down  his  commission. 
Sir  Ronald  Crawfurd  was  among  the  first  who  resorted  to  King  Robert,  when  he 
set.  to  recover  the  lost  liberties  of  his  country,  as  well  as  to  maintain  his  own  right; 
but  being  quickly  after  that  detached  with  a  party  into  Galloway,  with  two  of  the 
king's  brothers,  Thomas  and  Alexander  Bruoes,  they  were  attacked  by  a  strong 
party  of  the  enemy,  under  the  command  of  one  Duncan  M'Dowall,  who  defeated  Sir 
Ronald  and  the  two  Bruces,  and  were  all  three  sent  to  London  prisoners,  where 
they  v/cre  condemned  to  death  and  executed  in  the  1306  (a),  without  respect  ei- 
ther to  their  merit  or  quality,  which  lays  a  great  load  on  the  memory  of  that  king, 
who  could  destroy  and  cut  off  such  men,  Vthose  only  crime  was,  they  were  strenu- 
ous supporters  of  the  liberty  and  independency  of  their  country.  This  gallant 
man  left  only  one  daughter,  his  sole  heir.  Dame  Susan  Crawfurd,  who  married  Sir 
Duncan  Campbell,  son  to  Sir  Donald  Campbell  of  Red-Castle,  whereupon  they 
have  an  investiture  under  the  Great  Seal  of  the  great  estate  of  Loudon  to  them 
and  their  heirs;  which  failing,  to  the  lady  and  her  heirs,  though  part  of  the  char- 
ter (b)  runs  thus,  "  Robertus,  Dei  gratia,  &c.  Sciatis  nos  dedisse,  St  concessisse 
"  Duncano  Campbel,  militi,  omnes  terras  de  Loudon  &-  de  Stenston  cum  perti- 
"  ncntiis,  in  Cuningham,  prasdictis,  Duncano  &  Susannae  sponsae  suje  hsreditarie 
"  contingentes  ratione  dictae  sponsae  tenen.  &•  haben.  eidem  Duncano  &-  Susanna; 
"  sponsffi  sucE  &-  eorum  hxredibus  inter  ipsos  legitime  procreatis,  in  unam  inte- 
"  gram  hberam  baroniam,  &-c.  Si  vero  contingat  prcedictum  Duncanum  in  fatis 
"  decedere,  nullo  hserede  relicto  superstite  inter  ipsum  £t  pra;fatam  Susannam  le- 
"  gitime  procreate,  volumus  quod  praedicts  terra;  cum  pertinentiis  ad  praefatam 
"  Susannam  &•  propinquiores  hccredes  suas  sine  aliqua  contradictione  revertantur; 
"  apud  Penycook  quarto  die  Januarii  anno  legni  nostri  duodecimo."  The  next 
after  Sir  Reginald  Crawfurd  is 

Henricus  de  Sancto  Claro:  This  was  the  heir  of  the  great  family  of  the  Sinclairs 
of  Roslin,  who  not  only  overtopped  the  other  families  of  the  Sinclairs  who  were 
equal  to  them  in  antiquity,  but  most  of  the  noble  famihes  in  the  kingdom,  for 
they  were  Earls  of  Orkney  and  then  of  Caithness :  The  last  great  man  of  the  fa- 
mily broke  his  estate,  in  a  great  measure,  by  passing  by  his  eldest  son  in  the  suc- 
cession, and  giving  the  fee  of  the  earldom  of  Caithness  to  one  of  his  sons  by  a 
second  marriage,  and  the  rest  of  his  estate  to  another  son  of  the  same  marriage: 
But,  after  the  father's  death,  the  brother,  who  got  the  earldom  of  Caithness,  kept 
the  estate  he  had  got ;  but  the  other  brother.  Sir  Oliver  Sinclair  of  Roslin,  having, 
it  seems,  a  thorough  conviction  in  his  own  conscience  of  the  injustice  his  father 
had  done  to  the  eldest  brother,  generously  gave  him  back  the  estate  of  the  fa- 
mily in  Fife ;  after  which  Sir  Henry  Sinclair,  son  of  Sir  William  Sinclair,  the 
eldest  son,  became,  as  the  act  of  creation  bears,  and  which  is  an  act  of  Parliament, 
chief  of  the  blood,  and  heir  to  his  grandfather,  and  is  created  and  nominated  in  all 
time  coming  to  be  Lord  Sinclair,  mm  1458.  Ot  this  noble  lord  the  Sinclairs'  fa- 
mily are  the  lineal  heirs,  and  consequently  chief  of  the  illustrious  family  of  the 
Earls  of  Orkney  and  Caithness.  The  records,  after  Sir  Henry  Sinclair,  miles,  adds 
Cteterique  Barones  Regni  Scotia. 

(a)  He  left  a  daughter.     This  passage  is  from  Dr  Mackenzie.      [b)  Charta  Comitis  de  Loudon. 
I 


ON  THE  RAGMAN-ROLL.  13 

On  the  5th  of  July  anno  1291,  the  author  remarks  that  "  Nobilis  \ir  Willicl- 
•'  ma'  de  Duuglas  in  capella  manerii  Domini  VValteri  tie  Lindsay  apvul  Thurston, 
"  ven  t  St  lidelitatem  fecit  Domino  Regi  Angliie,  ac  superiori  f*.  dirccto  Domuio 
"  Regni  Scotiie,"  before  and  in  presence  of  Antiiony,  Bishop  of  Durham,  and  Allan, 
Bishop  of  Caithness,  who  was  then  Chancellor.  This  is  the  famous  Sir  William 
D'>u.:^las  of  tiiat  Ilk,  Dominus  ejiisdem,  as  1  see  him  designed.  It  is  true  this  brave 
gallant  man  fell  off  from  the  English  again ;  but  the  truth  is,  he  was  forced  to 
make  a  second  form  of  submission  to  the  K.ing  of  England,  though  it  was  much 
against  the  gram  with  him;  suspecting  he  was  n€ver  true  to  them,  tliey  imprisoned 
him  in  Berivick,  where  he  died,  anno  1303.  He  was  happy  in  two  noble  sons,  Sir 
James,  Lord,  or  Djininus  de  Dyji^las,  and  Sir  Archibald,  another  hero,  who  was 
Guardian  of  Scotland  in  the  minority  of  King  David  the  Bruce,  and  lost  his  life 
at  the  battle  of  HahdonhiU  in  the  1333.  It  is  a  common  mistake  that  he  was 
ever  Dominus  Gduidie,  or  had  any  pretence  of  a  title  to  it,  it  was  another  Sir 
Archibald  Douglas  that  got  the  Dominium  G  iluidie  from  King  David,  in  the  1371. 
The  gentleman,  in  whose  chapel  at  Thurston  Sir  William  Douglas  gave  his  oath 
of  fealty  and  submission,  was  Sir  Walter  Lindsay  of  Thurston  and  Craigie,  a  very 
ancient  tamily  of  the  Lindsays,  which,  in  the  days  of  King  Robert  IL  by  the 
heir-female  of  John  Lindsay  of  Craigie,  came  to  Sir  Hugh  Wallace  of  Riccarton, 
of  whom  flowed  the  'Walhues  of  Craigie,  who  carry  the  coat  of  Lindsay  in  the 
first  and  fourth  quarter  of  their  achievement. 

On  the  8th  of  July  the  King  of  England  being  in  Castro  ptiellarum,  that  is  the 
castle  of  Edinburgh,  there  swore  allegiance  to  him  Alum,  Abbot  of  the  Monastery 
of  Holyroodhouse,  near  Edinburgh,  ^  Dominus  Ricardus  Frisel ;  who  this  gentle- 
man is  I  cannot  say,  the  noble  surname  of  Eraser  were  then  so  numerous,  if  he  be 
not  the  proprietor  of  Makerston,  which  came  to  the  Erasers  by  marriage  of  the 
heir  of  the  Corbets;  but  as  to  this  I  dare  not  be  positive. 

At  the  castle  of  Strivelyn,  (Stirling),  July  12.  swore  Mlliam,  Bishop  of  Dumblane, 
and  Midise  Earl  of  Strathern.  He  was  a  very  loyal  patriot,  and  had  a  son,  Malise, 
who  was  his  successor  in  the  honour,  and  was  that  Earl  that  was  forfeited  by  Ed- 
ward Baliol,  as  the  pretender  to  the  throne  of  Scotland,  in  1332,  and  the  earldom 
of  Strathern,  as  far  as  his  gift  and  donation  could  go,  was  bestowed  on  the  Earl  of 
Warren,  an  English  lord,  who  thereupon  is  designed  Comes  de  Strathern  Ifl  Comes 
de  Surry  (a).  But  it  is  certain  he  never  was  forfaulted,  I  mean  the  Earl  of 
Strathern,  by  any  legal  king  of  Scotland:  However,  though  he  left  several  daugh- 
ters by  his  lady,  who  was  heir  of  the  earldom  of  Caithness,  yet  none  of  them 
succeeded  him  in  his  dignity  of  Cjmes  de  Strathern ;  it  came  to  his  nephew  Sir 
Maurice  Murray  of  Drumsargard,  who,  in  sundry  deeds,  authentic  vouchers,  and 
records,  is  designed  Mauritius  de  Moravia,  Comes  de  Strathern;  but  he  being  slain 
at  the  battle  of  Durham,  the  honour  went  no  farther  in  that  race. 

Galfride  de  Moubray.  or  Godofridc  Moubry,  was  Baron  of  the  baronies  of  Dal- 
meny,  Barnbougle,  and  Inverkeithing ;  he,  and  his  friends  the  Mowbrays,  in  those 
times,  were  sometimes  in  the  interest  of  their  country,  and  sometimes  on  the 
English  side;  sometimes  forfeited  for  their  disloyalty,  sometimes  restored  again, 
through  all  the  reign  of  King  Robert  L  and  a  part  of  his  son's  David  IL ;  at  last 
they  turned  loyal  and  got  back  their  estate,  and  were  great  barons,  by  the  title  of 
Barnbougle,  and  Domini  de  Innerkeithing .  The  direct  male  of  this  great  tamily  of 
the  Mowbrays  of  Barnbougle  subsisted  till  King  James  V.'s  time,  thnt  Sir  John 
Mowbray  of  Barnbougle  left  a  daughter,  his  heir,  who  married  Robert  B  irton,  son 
to  Sir  Robert  Barton  of  Over-Barnton,  by  Dame  Elizabeth  Crawfurd  his  wife,  who, 
"by  act  of  Parliament,  changed  the  surname  to  Mowbray.  In  this  line  the  House 
of  Barnbougle  lasted  till  after  the  restoration  of  King  Charles  IL  The  heir-male, 
and  the  true  representative  of  the  great  Lords  of  Barnbougle,  and  Domini  B  ironle 
de  Innerkeithing,  is  the  branch  of  the  Mowbrays  of  Culcairny  in  p'ife,  in  the 
barony  of  Inverkeithing;  their  ancestor,  from  the  original  charter  of  the  lands, 
I  have  seen,  is  granted  by  Sir  John  Mowbray  of  Barnbougle,  to  William  Mowbray 

',a)  Rymer  and  Dugdale. 

Vol.  IL.  7  R. 


i^  HIITORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 

patruo  suo,  his  father's  brother,  in  the  1511,  from  whom,  in  a  very  distinct  and 
accurate  progress,  is  lineally  coaie  Robert  Mowbray,  now  of  Culcairny. 

Wdlleimus  de  Rothein;  that  is  plainly  the  name  of  Ruthven,  who  were  a  great 
family,  and  an  ancient  house,  and  had  long  continued  in  Perthshue:  Their  ances- 
tor was  a  great  man,  Suanits  Jiliits  I'bori,  who  had  a  patronymic  name  before  they 
Took  the  name  of  Ruthven ;  they  rose  to  be  peers  in  the  1487,  and  to  be  Earls  of 
Gowrie  in  1581,  and  fell  by  that  execrable  attempt  the  two  brothers  made  to  have 
bereaved  King  James  of  his  life,  at  the  Earl  of  Cowrie's  own  lodging  m  the  town 
of  Perth,  the  5th  of  August  1601;  for  which,  by  act  of  Parliament,  the  surname 
Avas  discharged,  and  the  5th  of  August  appointed  for  ever  to  be  a  day  of  thanks- 
giving for  his  Majesty's  merciful  deliverance. 

On  the  17th  June  at  Dunfermline,  then  severals  gave  their  oath  of  allegiance 
and  submission  to  King  Edward  1.  Ridulpbus  abbot  of  Dunfermline,  y  Nubilis  Vir 
Dominus  Andreas  Fraser.  This  was  another  branch  of  the  great  and  splendid 
House  of  the  Erasers  of  Olivei-Castle,  and  Sheriffs  of  Tweeddale  :  This  Sir  An- 
drew was  Sheriff  of  Stirling,  and  Djtninusde  Touch,  which  afterwards  came  to  the 
Hays  of  Tullibody,  and  by  marriage  of  Egidia,  daughter  and  heir  of  John  Hay 
of  Tullibody,  that  estate  came  to  Alexander  Seaton  of  Gordon,  the  first  who  was, 
in  the  reign  of  King  James  II.,  invested  in  the  honour  of  the  Earl  of  Huntly,  1449: 
By  this  lady  he  had  a  son,  Alexander  Seaton,  who  in  many  deeds  extant  is  de- 
signed "  lilius  et  haeres  apparens  Alexandri  Seaton  de  Gordon  ;"  he  gave  to  his 
eldest  son  the  estate  of  Tullibody,  Touch,  and  the  barony  of  Gordon  in  the  south. 
He  kept  the  surname  of  Seaton,  and  quartered  the  arms  of  Hay  with  those  of 
Seaton,  of  whom,  in  a  lineal  course  of  succession,  is  the  present  Seaton  of  Touch. 
The  first  Earl  of  Huntly  took  the  fancy  to  change  his  name  from  Seaton  to  Gor- 
don, and  got  the  estate  and  the  honour  of  the  earldom  of  Huntly  limited  to  him, 
and  the  heirs-male  of  his  second  marriage,  with  a  lady  of  the  House  of  Crichton. 
His  lineal  heir,  flowing  from  the  second  marriage,  is  his  Grace  the  Duke  of 
Gordon. 

Willielmus  de  Hayia,  I  have  very  probable  grounds  of  conjecture,  is  the  ancient 
family  of  the  Hays  of  Naughton  in  Eife,  which  came  afterwards  to  the  Crichtons 
by  marriage,  from  whose  heirs  the  estate  was  purchased  by  Mr  Peter  Hay  of  the 
Hays  of  Megginch  in  Perthshire. 

Andreas  de  Moravia ;  There  are  so  many  great  men  of  the  name  of  Murray  at  this 
time  that  it  is  hard  now  to  distinguish  them.  Who  this  gentleman  precisely  is,  I 
cannot  say. 

Next  to  him  is  Constandnus  de  Locbore,  Vicecomes  de  Fife  ;  a  very  learned  author 
says,  he  was  Vicecomes  de  Fife  in  1290,  and  had  his  residence  in  that  county  ;  the 
estate  of  the  Lochores  of  that  Ilk,  in  the  reign  of  King  Robert  I.,  went  by  mar- 
riage to  Adam  de  Valoniis,  whose  heritage,  in  the  succeeding  reign,  came  to  heirs- 
female.  The  eldest  was  married  to  Henry  Waidlaw  of  Tony,  and  that  way  got 
the  estate  of  Wester-Lochore  ;  the  second  to  Roger  Boswell,  the  ancestor  of  the 
Boswells  of  Balmuto,  and  got  mat  way  the  estate  of  Auchterderran,  Glassmont, 
and  Muircambus  :  the  third  daughter,  and  heir  of  Lochore,  was  married  to  Sir 
Andrew  Livingston  of  Drumray  and  Easter- Wemyss,  and  got  that  way  the  half  of 
Auchterderen. 

19th  July,  In  capella  de  Kingborn,  Dominus  Jjhannes  de  Moravia,  wlio  is 
Murray  of  Drumsargard,  of  whom  is  come  the  Murrays  of  Abercairny. 

Michael  Scott.  This  is  the  ancestor  of  the  once  great  House  of  the  Scotts  of  Bal- 
wyrie  in  Fife,  who  were  surpassed  by  few  families  there,  eithei  for  antiquity  or 
grandeur.  They  were  come  of  Sir  Michael  Scott,  in  tlie  reign  of  King  Alexander 
II.  who  is  witness  to  the  charter  by  that  prince  to  the  abbey  of  Kinloss  («}.  He 
got  the  estate  of  Balwyrie  by  the  marriage  of  the  heir  of  Richard  de  Balweiry,  and  had 
that  famous  knight  Sir  Michael  Scott  of  Balwyrie,  who,  with  Sir  Michael  Wemyss,. 
w'as  sent  to  bring  over  from  Norway  the  young  Qj.ieen  Margaret,  the  grandchild 
of  Kmg  Alexander  III.     He,  or  his  son,  another  Sir  Michael  Scott  of  Balwyrie^ 

(<?)  Dalrymple's  Appendix. 


ON  THE  RAGMAN-ROLL.  13 

was  sent  ambassador  from  King  Robert  L  to  demand  the  arrears  fr.^m  the  King  of 
Norway  ;  another  of  them,  Su-  Michael  Scott  of  Balwyrie,  was  sent  to  Enghuul 
in  place  of  another  of  the  Hostages  of  K.ing  James  L  Sir  William  Scott  of  Bal- 
vyrie  was  slain  at  FlodJen.  Sir  William,  his  son,  was  conjunct  Justiciary  with 
the  Earl  of  M  iiray  and  the  Lord  Ei'-kins,  before  it  came  to  be  hereditarily  vested 
in  the  House  of  Argyle.  Mr  Thomas  Scott  of  Pitgorno  and  Abbotshall  was  a 
brotlier  of  tiie  family,  he  was  Justice-Clerk  in  King  James  Vs.  time.  Tlie  family, 
though  they  be  long  out  of  the  estate,  are  still  represented  by  Scott  of  Ancrum, 
baronet,  in  Teviotdale  (/;). 

Ivjnede  Kinross  is  after  Sir  Michael  Scott  ;  The  estate  of  Kinross  was  at  this 
time,  and  afterwards,  possessed  by  those  of  the  same  surniune,  and  those  of  the 
surname  had  latelier  the  lands  of  Kippenross. 

Thomas  Kier.  Who  this  is  I  cannot  say  ;  but  he  has  been  a  man  of  rank  and  con- 
dition, for,  being  the  last  in  that  roll,  mUitibus  is  added  to  them,  which  imports  they 
were  knights. 

jipuci  S  inctum  Amlream.  There  swore  to  the  King  of  England  the  usual  oath  of 
submission,  •'  Joiiannes  Prior  Sancti  Andreie,  una  cum  nobilibus  viris.  Domino 
•'  Adam  d;  Ratrief ;"  This  is  the  head  of  the  ancient  family  of  Rattray  of  that 
Dk,  in  Perthshire,  which  subsisted  till  king  Ja  ncs  V.'s  time,  that  the  heiress  was 
married  to  the  Earl  of  Athol,  and  Rattray  of  Craighall  is  tiie  heir-male. 

Witlielmus  de  Maulia  is  the  head  of  the  family  of  the  noble  Earls  of  Panmure, 
who  have  been  a  family  subsiscing  from  King  Malcolm's  time,  though  they  did 
not  attain  to  the  peerage  til!  the  1646.  Patrick  Maule  of  Panmure  was  created 
Earl  of  Panmure,  See  the  Feerage  of  Scotland,  and  Lives  of  the  Great  Chamber- 
lains, where  a  full  account  is  given  of  this  noble  family,  to  which  I  can  add  no- 
thing, save  that  this  WilU'tvi  ds  Maulia  de  Panmure,  had  a  discharge  for  a  part  of 
bis  relief  from  the  King  of  England,  apud  Bornie,  ximo  die  Julii. 

Alexander  de  Abernethy;  this  is  the  knight  of  Banbriga  who,  in  the  reign  of 
King  Robert  I.  gave  his  estate  to  his  three  daughters,  co-heirs,  the  Countess  of 
Angus,  the  Lady  Crawford,  and  the  Lady  Rothes. 

Hugo  dc  la  Hay;  the  surname  of  Kay  is  at  this  time  so  very  numerous,  that  it  is 
hard  to  distinguish  them,  but  where  their  local  titles  are  added,  as  Errol,  Loch- 
quhaiTet,  Naughton,  &.c. 

Henricus  de  Anstruther ;  this  is  the  predecessor  of  the  most  ancient  family  of 
Anstruther  of  '.hat  Ilk,  in  the  county  of  Fife,  where  they  have  been  seated  for 
many  centuries  past  ;  they  seem  to  be  the  original  possessors;  and  when  surnames 
turned  common,  they  have  taken  a  name  from  their  own  estate. 

JViHielmus  de  Candda  B'jminus  de  Anstruther  is  a  donator  to  the  abbacy  of  Bal- 
merino,  in  the  reign  of  V/illiam,  founded  by  his  brother  David,  comes,  who  was 
Earl  of  Huntingdon  in  England,  and  Carioch  in  Scotland.  Henry,  his  son,  is  de- 
signed fdius  IViUielmi  de  Candela,  Dominus  de  Anstruther,  when  he  contirms  his 
fathers  gift  to  Balmerino,  1221. 

Henry  de  Anstruther  was  his  son,  who  gives  his  oath  here  of  fealty  to  King 
Edward  of  England,  1292.  From  this  Henry  the  family  of  Anstruther  of  that 
Ilk  have  a  succession,  and  a  series  of  their  House,  down  to  the  present  worthy 
representative  of  the  family.  Sir  John  Anstruther  of  that  Ilk,  baronet,  with  their 
alliances,  and  the  several  honourable  ollices  they  have  executed  tor  a  great  while 
ago. 

'Johannes  de  la  Hay ;  neither  do  I  know  who  this  Hay  is,  et  Robertus  de  Betbune 
mUitibus.  This  is  the  ancestor  of  the  Bethunes  of  Balfour.  This  is  the  same  Ro- 
bertus  d  ■  Bethune  whom  the  learned  Mr  Rymer  mentions  as  doing  homage  to  the 
King  of  England,  for  lands  he  held  of  the  crown  in  the  1296  ;  they  are  said  to  be 
of  French  extraction. 

The  first  I  have  found  is  Robertus  de  Betbune,  in  the  reign  of  Alexander  III. 
witness  to  a  charter  by  Rogerus  de  ^uincy.  Comes  de  Jf^incestre,  to  Seyer  de  Seaton^ 
ef  an  annuity  out  of  the  mill  of  Travernent.      They  got  the  lands  of  Balfour  by 

(!')  Nisbet's  Heraldry. 


10  HISTORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 

marriage  of  the  heiress  of  the  same  surname,  and  a  family  of  high  antiquity, 
daughter  of  Sir  J-jhn  de  Balfour  de  eodem.  There  is  a  charter  in  the  rolls  by 
King  Robert  II.  ratifying  and  confirming  a  deed  and  grant,  "  (^os  Duncanus 
'  Comes  de  Fife  dedit  et  concessit  Johanni  Beaton,  de  totis  et  integris  terris  de 
"  Balfour  et  de  Newton,  et  de  Calile,  in  vicecomitatu  de  Fife  jacentibus.  Apud 
"  Edinburgh,  decimo  octavo  die  mensis  Maii,  anno  regni  nostri  septimo."  The 
Liird  of  Balfour  is  the  lineal  heir-male  of  the  family  :  I'he  character  of  the  fa- 
mdy  was  highly  raised  by  the  many  great  churchmen  it  produced ;  some  of 
them  bishops,  archbishops,  cardinals,  and  abbots  of  monasteries,  &.c.  More 
of  them  may  be  seen  in  the  Lives  of  the  Officers  of  State,  to  which  I  must 
refer. 

July  23.  at  the  monastery  of  Lindores,  there  came  and  swore  allegiance  to  the 
King  of  England,  John,  abbot  of  Lindores,  the  head  of  the  convent ;  but  who  he 
is  I  cannot  say,  L-?  nobiles  viri. 

I'Villielmus  de  Fenton  et  Simon  Freshele ;  these  two  gentlemen  are  from  the  north, 
and  were,  as  I  take  them,  two  of  the  heirs-portioners  of  the  House  of  Lovat,  of 
the  race  of  the  Bissets;  we  find  in  the  chartulary  of  Murray,  in  1222,  nobilis  vir 
Johaiuies  Bisseth,  Dominus  de  Lovetb.  The  family  came  to  be  divided  into>  ]three 
parts,  and  the  estate  along  with  it,  by  three  daughters,  viz.  Mary,  who  man-ted  Sir 
David  Graham,  knight,  a  brother  of  the  Kincardine  family,  who  is  on  that  design- 
ed Dominus  de  Loveth  (f).  The  second,  Cecilia  de  Bisseth,  was  married  to  Sir  Ml- 
liam  de  Fenton,  and  is  designed  Dominus  de  Beufort  (d),  and  is  the  same  person 
that  swears  the  fealty  to  King  Edward.  Elizabeth,  the  third  daughter  of  Sit  John 
Bisset,  was  the  wife  of  Sir  Andrew  de  Boscho,  Dominus  de  Redcastle  ;  and  had  a 
daughter,  Maria  de  Boscho,  as  she  is  called,  who  is  designed  Domina  de  Kilravock  ; 
which  lands  and  estate  she  brought  to  her  husband,  Hugh  de  Ross,  from  the  south 
country,  as  from  his  armorial  bearing,  the  water-budgets ;  of  whom  is  come  Hugh 
Ruse  of  Kilravock  (e). 

Simon  Freshele,  i.  e.  Fraser,  for  what  I  know,  may  be  one  of  the  noble  ancestors 
of  the  Lord  Fraser  of  Lovat.  They  seem  to  have  had  right  to  a  part  of  the  estate 
that  was  the  Bissets',  and  after  them  the  Grahams',  though  I  have  found  no  Fraser 
expressly  designed  of  Lovat  till  the  1367,  that  Hugo  Fraser,  Djminus  de  Loveth, 
does  homage  to  the  Bishop  of  Murray,  for  lands  and  fishings  tie  held  of  the  See 
on  the  water  of  Forn.  I  cannot  see  when  precisely  this  noble  family  came  to  the 
peerage;  they  might  be  promoted  to  the  honour  by  King  James  I.  after  the  1430; 
yet  we  have  no  positive  voucher,  that  I  have  seen,  that  this  great  family  are  in 
the  quality  of  peers,  till  the  time  of  King  James  III.  anno  i^'j'2,.  The  lineal  heir- 
male  of  this  noble  family,  to  this  day,  inherits  the  estate  and  honour  of  his  illus- 
trious ancestors ;  and  may  they  enjoy  them,  by  an  uninterrupted  race  and  line  in 
the  ancient  channel,  to  latest  posterity. 

On  the  24th  of  July,  the  whole  community  of  the  burgh  of  Perth  made  their 
submission  ;  and  the  same  day  in  ecclesia  fratrum  prtedicatorum,  the  convent  of 
the  Gray-Friars,  Andreas  Abbas  de  Cupro,  Maria  Regina  de  Man,  et  comitissa  de 
Stratbern.  This  lady  was  the  daughter  of  Alexander  de  Ergadia,  Dominus  de  Lorn, 
and  widow  of  Reginald,  King  of  Man.  '  Her  relations  were  all  deeply  engaged  in 
the  English  interest;  she  was  the  second  wife  of  Malise  Earl  of  Strathern:  This 
IS  the  same  lady,  as  I  conjecture,  who,  long  after  this,  in  the  1320,  entered  into 
a  conspiracy  against  King  Robert  the  Bruce  ;  for  which  this  lady,  and  several  of 
her  accomplices,  were  attainted.  This  1  take  to  be  the  story,  ill  vouched,  of  a 
daughter  of  the  Earl  of  Strathern,  that  was  married  to  the  Earl  of  Warren,  air 
English  lord,  for  which  she  was  forfeited.  Of  this  part  of  the  traditional  story 
there  is  not  one  true  word  ;  for  the  Earl  of  Strathern,  at  this  time,  was  never  for- 
feited by  any  lawful  authority  ;  for  no  man  whatsoever  was  a  more  dutiful  loyal 
subject  to  king  David  ;  and  for  his  being  forfeited  by  the  usurper  Edward  Baliol, 
and  the  earldom  given  by  him  to  the  Earl  of  Warren,  had  no  eftect,  and  he 
continued  in  the  full  and  peaceable  possession  of  his  estate  ajid  dignity  till  th& 
end  of  his  life. 

("fj  Chartulary  of  Murray,  and.  Kilravock's  wnts.     (d)  Ibidem.     (■<>_)  Ibidem., 

3 


ON  THE  RAGMAN-ROLL.  17 

Johannes  Camhrun,  who  in  otlier  deeds  is  designed  Dominus  de  Balygrenoch  ;  but 
what  connection  there  is  betwixt  hini  and  the  Cainerons  of  Lochiel  I  cannot  say, 
and  shall  not  ofter  my  own  conjecture. 

Thomas  Abbas  de  Scoon,  et  pntseiuc  Dovenalde  Comite  de  Mur  ;  this  is  the  Earl 
of  Marr,  as  we  observed,  who  was  slain  afterwards  at  the  battle  of  Duplin. 

Malise  Comes  de  S'rathcin  ;  this  was  Earl  Malise,  called  the  elder,  who  died  in 
1300,  and  left  the  loval  Earl  Malise,  the  last  of  the  race:  J  he  earl  that  we  re- 
marked was  forfeited  by  Edward  Baliol,  but  never  by  King  David,  as  some  through 
mistake  have  asserted.  He  died  without  issue-male  ;  and  though  he  had  several 
daughters,  Isabel,  who  was  married  to  the  great  fa:nily  of  the  Sinclairs,  yet  upon 
his  death  the  title  of  honour  did  not  descend  to  heirs  of  line,  but  was  given  by 
the  crown  to  a  nephew  of  his,  by  his  sister,  Sir  Maurice  Murray  of  Drumsargard, 
■who  is  Comes  de  Strathern,  from  the  1343  (a),  till  his  death  at  the  battle  of  Dur- 
ham, three  years  after.  I  can  assign  no  reason  why  his  heirs  of  line  and  at  law 
did  not  succeed  upon  the  total  failure  of  the  males  of  the  first  of  the  family,  who 
received  the  feu  :  but  it  cUn  be  no  otherwise  accounted  for,  than  that  the  dignity 
of  Strathern,  being  a  very  ancient  feudal  honour,  it  was  limited  only  to  males;  and, 
in  failure  of  these,  as  has  been  the  case  here,  xht  feudtim,  the  feu,  the  hereditary 
honour,  reverted  to  the  crown  ;  and,  being  in  the  disposal  of  the  sovereign,  it  was 
disposed  of  to  the  nearest  relation  of  the  family  that  was  a  male,  though  he  was 
not  the  heir-male. 

The  23d  of  July  those  gave  their  oath  of  fealty,  John  de  Ergadia,  flius  nobilis 
viri  Alexandri  de  Ergadia;  this  was  the  great  Lord  of  Lorn,  who  was  deeply  en- 
gaged in  the  English  interest,  being  of  the  kindred  and  aUiance  of  the  Cumins  of 
Ba^denoch:  However,  afterwards  they  turned  better  and  more  loyal  subjects  to  the 
Brucian  kings,  and  came  to  enjoy  their  estate  peaceably. 

Eugene,  or  Ewen,  of  Lorn,  left  an  heir-female,  who,  in  the  time  of  King  Ro- 
bert IIL  was  married  to  John  Stewart  of  Innermeth,  knight,  son  and  heir  of  Sir 
Robert  Stewart  of  Shanbothie  and  Innermeth,  who,  upon  this,  we  find  in  authen- 
tic vouchers,  is  designed  Johannes  Senescallits  de  Innermeath,  Dominus  de  Lorn,  anno 
1407  {b). 

July  29th,  the  King  of  England  being  in  the  castle  of  Edinburgh,  there  did  ho- 
mage to  him  John,  Abbot  of  Newbottle,  Walter  M agister  Domus  de  Ballincreif; 
what  was  the  nature  of  this  House,  I  cannot  say.  Ralph,  master  of  the  House  of 
Soutra,  or  "  Magister  Domus  de  Soutray,  &  eodem  die  &  loco."  Alexander, 
Prior  of  the  Hospital  of  St  John  of  Jerusalem;  of  which  I  can  give  no  more  than 
the  common  account  of  the  order,  which  is  not  necessary  here;  "  Brian  preceptor 
"  militiae  Templi  in  eodem  regno."  The  account  of  the  Templars  is  so  well 
known  that  I  need  say  nothing  of  them  here. 

On  the  1st  of  August,  at  Berwick,  there  did  homage  to  King  Edward  Henry 
Ep'tscopus  Aberdeen.  His  name  was  Cheyne,  of  the  House  of  Inverugie,  and  ne- 
phew to  the  great  Cumin  of  Badenoch:  Li  the  heat  of  the  war  he  fled  to  England, 
but  afterwards  made  his  peace  with  King  Robert,  who  allowed  him  to  return  to 
the  exercise  of  his  function,  which  he  exerced  to  his  death  in  1328. 

Robertas  Episcopus  de  Ross;  he  is  not  insert  regularly  in  Archbishop  Spottiswood's 
list;  I  think  the  learned  reverend  author  has  not  placed  him  in  the  succession 
right ;  for  he,  Robertus  Episcopus  de  Ross,  in  1290,  who,  with  others  of  the  clergy,  ad- 
dress the  King  of  England  for  a  marriage  to  be  contracted  betwixt  the  prince  his 
son  and  Margaret  the  maid  of  Norway,  the  young  Queen  of  Scotland,  anno  1290; 
and,  with  him,  there  did  homage,  nobifis  vir  IVillielmus  Comes  de  Ross.  This  Earl 
made  a  considerable  figure  after  this,  in  the  struggles  we  had  with  the  English,  for  the 
liberty  and  independent  rights  of  the  crown  and  kingdom  of  Scotland.  His  fa- 
mily allied  with  the  Bruces  the  Earls  of  Carrick ;  his  lady  was  sister  to  the  king, 
which  made  the  Earl  of  Ross  a  firm  and  faithful  friend  to  King  Robert. 

PViUielmus  de  Moravia,  miles;  this  I  take  to  be  the  same  great  and  illustrious 
person  who,  in  the  same  record,  in  another  place,  is  designed  D minus  de  Bothwel ; 

(a)  Charter  of  the  Earl  of  Sutherlands.       {b)  Rymei's  Foedera  Angliat. 

Vol.  IL  7   S 


i8  HISTORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 

for  that  family  still  retained,  after  tlicy  came  to  settle  in  the  south,  a  great  estate 
of  land  in  the  north,  in  the  shire  of  Murray ;  for  the  same  persons,  in  many  in- 
stances, swore  in  different  counties  where  their  estates  lay. 

Divid  de  Graham;  this  is  for  certain  the  Sir  David  de  Graham,  designed  Dominui 
de  Loveth,  who  is  brother  of  Sir  Patrick  Graham  of  Kincarduie,  and  that  got  Lo- 
vat  by  his  wife  Mary,  one  of  the  co-heiresses  of  Sir  John  Bis^et  of  Lovat;  both 
he  and  Patrick  his  son,  in  the  fagy,  are  mentioned  in  the  chartulary  of  Murray: 
But  how  Lovat  came  from  them  to  the  Frasers,  vyho  are  proprietors  of  it  in  King- 
David  Bruce's  time,  1  cannot  say. 

The  4th  of  August,  then  did  homage  to  the  King  of  England  Henry  Abbot  of 
Arbroath,  isl  Bominus  David  de  Torthorald,  miles ;  this  was  a  south-country  family 
of  note,  which  c»ne  to  the  Carlyles  by  marriage,  who  rose  to  be  lords  of  Parlia- 
ment in  1473,  in  King  James  III.  his  time.  This  peerage  of  Carlyle  is  represented  by 
William  Carlyle  of  Locharthor,  who  is  lately  served  heir  to  his  predecesssor  Mi- 
chael Lord  Carlyle,  who  died  in  the  1579;  I  believe  the  service  was  carried  on  in 
view  to  claim  the  peerage  :  But  the  gentleman  has  not  as  yet  lodged  any  petition 
with  the  king,  setting  forth  his  claim  and  title  to  the  dignity,  to  which  he  is  the 
undoubted  heir-male  in  a  lineal  course  of  succession. 

The  13th  of  May  1296,  in  a  renunciation  of  all  the  former  confederacies  of  the 
nation  with  the  crown  of  France,  is  Patrick  de  Dunbar  Comes  Marchie:  This  earl 
is  the  first  of  his  noble  family  that  left  the  title  of  Comes  de  Dunbar,  and  took  that 
ai  Cmes  Marchie.  In  this  ticklish  time  the  earl  was  not  much  fixed  to  any  side, 
sometimes  appearing  for  his  country  and  her  liberties,  and  sometimes  serving  the 
interest  of  the  King  of  England  very  strenuously. 

Gilbertus  Comes  de  Angus,  of  whom  we  remarked  before.  He  was  an  English- 
man of  the  name  of  Umfraville,  that  was  forfeited,  because  he  would  not  become 
■A  true  honest  Scotsman. 

Jacobus  dictus  Senescallus  Scotia.  This  was  the  Great  Steward  of  Scotland,  who 
died  in  the  1309,  and  was  the  grandfather  of  King  Robert  II.  See  it  from  a 
French  copy  page  649. 

On  the  15th  of  May  1296,  Dominiis  Johannes  Senescallus,  pradicti  Domini  Jacobi 
Germanus.  This  was  Sir  John  Stewart  of  Bonkill,  of  whom  I  have  given  some 
account  already,  and  of  his  illustrious  descendants. 

Thomas  de  Somervile,  Chevalier.  This  is  the  same  gentleman  that  we  find  from 
authentic  documents  designed  Domims  de  Linton,  making  donations  out  of  that  ba- 
rony to  the  abbacy  of  Melrose.  He  is  one  of  these  glorious  patriots  that  stood  so 
firm  to  the  interest,  and  for  the  honour  of  Scotland,  when  so  many  others  made 
very  wide  steps  of  defection.  He  was  in  high  favour  with  King  Robert  the  Bruce, 
when  he  came  to  the  crown,  which  he  well  deserved.  This  is  a  Norman  family 
that  came  to  England  with  the  Conqueror,  and  from  thence  they  came  to  Scotland 
with  King  David  I.;  and  Carnwath  was  their  first  estate,  out  of  which  Willielmus 
de  Somm^rvill  makes  donations  to  the  See  of  Glasgow.  Sir  Thomas  Somerville  of 
Carnwath  was  Justice-General  in  the  1431,  in  King  James  I.'s  time,  and  is  one  of 
the  Domini  Parliamenti,  first  introduced  into  our  constitution  of  the  peerage  by 
that  prmce  antio  1427;  for  before  his  reign  we  had  no  other  set  of  nobles  but  the 
comites  and  the  barones,  which  included  all  that  held  of  the  crown  by  tenure  in 
libera  baronia.  James,  the  present  Lord  Somerville,  is  the  heir  of  this  noble  fa- 
mily, who  got  the  honour  revived  in  his  person,  by  a  decree  of  the  House  of 
Peers  of  Great  Britain  in  1721,  after  the  honour  had  lain  dormant  and  been  waved 
for  the  space  of  an  hundred  and  three  years,  from  the  1618. 

Die  decimo  apud  Edinburgum,  venit  Dominus  J'ViUielmus  Douglas,  miles.  This  is  the 
brave  patriot  Sir  William  Douglas  of  that  Ilk,  who  had  stood  long  at  a  distance  from 
complying  with  the  English,  at  last  submitted ;  but  I  am  apt  to  believe,  he  and 
many  others  never  meant  to  keep  these  forced  oaths,  by  which  they  did  not  think 
they  were  bound;  for  he  soon  after  showed  he  had  the  same  inclinations  to  redeem 
and  relieve  his  country  from  thraldom  and  slavery  as  he  had  done  before.  I  have 
some  further  remark  upon  him  in  these  critical  observations.  Along  with  Sir  "Wil- 
liam Douglas  tirere  was  Sir  Walter  Logan,  who  is  said  to  be  the  ancestor  of  the  once 
great  House  of  the  Logans  of  Restalrig  near  Edinburgh.     Our  historians  mention 


ON  THE  RAGMAN-ROLL.  ip 

a- descendant  of  his,  that  went  over  to  the  Holy  Land  with  King  Robert  tlic 
Bruce'b  eart,  for  which  they  wore  a  man's  heart  in  their  arms.  They  turned  om 
to  be  a  great  family,  and  alhed  with  a  daughter  of  King  Robert  IL  1  have  seen  a 
charter  by  Kmg  Robert  IIL  Roberto  Logan,  militi,  dilecto  frcitri  suo,  of  the  lands  and 
barony  of  Grugar,  which  continued  long  in  their  family:  Robert  Logan  of  Restal- 
rig  was  forfaulted  in  the  i6cq,  five  years  after  his  death,  upon  the  confession  of 
one  Sprot,  a  notary  at  Eyemouth,  who  produced  a  train  of  letters  that  liad  past  be- 
twixt Restabrig  and  the  two  brothers  of  the  House  of  Gowrie,  in  relation  to  the 
conspiracy  for  seizing  on  tlie  King:  This  odd  process  is  in  every  body's  hand  ; 
this  prosecution  was  said  to  be  drawn  on  chiefly  by  a  great  man  in  high  favour, 
and  in  a  great  oiBce,  who  was  promised  Logan's  estate  when  it  should  be  confis- 
cated. 

July  12.  Robert  us  Mtischam.  I  take  this  to  be  Muschamp,  a  name  found  both 
in  our  history  and  the  Enghsh. 

Johannes  de  Callentar,  miles.  This  is  the  head  of  the  ancient  family  of  the 
Callenders  of  that  Ilk,  in  Stirlingshire,  of  whom  1  have  seen  many  vouchers:  The 
first  deed  that  1  have  seen  is  a  charter  by  "  Malduinus  Comes  de  Levena.x,  Mal- 
"  colmo  filio  Duncani  de  terris  de  Glaswel  cum  Eva  sorore  sua,  &-  Carrucatam  8^ 
"  dimidiam  CaiTucata;  terrx  in  Kilynsyth,  cum  jure  patronatus  Ecclesia;  de  Mo- 
"  nyabroch,"'  dated  on  St  Laurence-day  1217,  confirmed  by  King  Alexander  IL 
the  second  year  of  his  reign  («).  There  is  a  charter  by  Alexander  IL  the  26th 
of  August,  the  25th  year  of  his  reign,  "  Malcolmo  filio  Duncani  de  terris  de 
"  Glentarvin,  Monyabroch,  Kilsyth,  Glasswell,"  which  he  had  by  the  grant  of  the 
Earl  of  Lennox,  "  &  terras  de  Calynter,"  he  had  from  the  king  "  in  liberam 
"  warenam,''  in  a  free  forestry.  To  this  deed  IValterus  filius  AUani  Senescallus  ac 
Justiciarius  Scotue  is  a  witness  in  the  1246.  This  Malcolm  was  succeeded  by 
Alum  de  Calleriter  his  son,  who  has  taken  his  name,  as  was  usual,  from  his  own 
estate;  for  ther'e  is  a  renunciation  by  Johannes  de  Kinross,  miles,  Aluino  de  Calenter, 
of  any  right  he  had  to  the  lands  which  his  father,  Malcolmus  Thanus,  i.  e.  Do- 
minus  de  Calenter,  had  been  infeft  in,  dated  in  1257;  to  which  deed  David  de 
Graham  is  a  witness:  Patrick  de  Callcndar  of  that  Ilk  was  forfeited  for  being  of 
the  party  of  Edward  Baliol,  by  King  David  IL  upon  which  Sir  William  Living- 
ston got  the  estate  of  Callender  by  a  charter  the  loth  July  1347;  but  to  fortify 
his  title  in  case  of  any  after  game,  he  married  Christian  Callender,  the  gentleman's 
daughter  who  had  been  forfaulted  ;  for  there  is  a  charter  by  King  David,  "  Do- 
*'  mino  Willielmo  de  Livingston  &•  Christianie  de  Callendar  sponsK  sue,"  of  the 
lands  of  Kilsyth,  narrating,  that  it  was  at  the  desire  of  Sir  Robert  Erskine,  in  re- 
gard that  Patrick  of  Callender,  father  to  the  said  Christian,  had  the  best  right 
thereto,  and  which  had  come  to  the  king's  hands,  by  decease  of  Margaret,  daugh- 
ter of  Robert  De  la  Val,  an  Englishman,  he  having  got  them  from  Malcolm  Earl 
of  Wigton.  I  see  this  Robert  De  la  Val  that  he  had  also  the  lands  of  Dalziel,  and 
that  he  forfeited  them;  for  there  is  a  charter  by  King  David  IL  "  Roberto  Senes- 
"  callo  de  Shandbothy  de  terris  de  Dakiel  &-  de  Modcrvile  nos  contingentes,  eo 
"  quod  haeredes  quondam  Roberti  De  la  Val,  contra  fidem  &-  pacem  nostram  in 
"  Angha  comraorantur,"  20th  March,  33d  of  the  king's  reign. 

Dominus  IVillielmus  de  Rutbven.  This  is  the  Ruthvens  of  that  Ilk,  of  whom  al- 
ready. 

Dominus  IVillielmus  de  Gordino,  miles.  I  take  this  to  be  Gordon  latinized,  a 
branch  of  the  House  of  Gordon  in  the  South. 

13th  July,  Malisius  Comes  de  Strathern.     Of  whom  already. 

I'Valterus  de  Corrj,  miles.  This  was  the  family  of  Corry  of  that  Ilk  in  Annan- 
dale,  which  continued  a  family  till  King  James  V.'s  time,  that  it  came  to  the 
Johnston's,  a  son  of  the  House  of  Johnston  by  marriage,  for  there  is  a  charter  by 
King  James  V.  Johanni  Johnston  de  eodem.-  The  succession  is  limited  to  the  heirs- 
male  of  his  body ;  and  failing,  to  Robert  Johnston  his  brother-german ;  and  fail- 
ing his  heirs-male,  to  Adam  Johnston  of  Corry  his  brother-german,  1542.  Of  this 
Adam  is  come  the  Johnstons  of  Girthhead  in  Annandale  (b). 

(a)  Writs  of  the  House  of  Kilsyth  I  hav;  seen.       (*)  Char:  .r  In  the  Register  of  the  Great  S;al. 


lo  HISTORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 

Dominus  Michael  de  PVeems,  miles.  This  is  Sir  Michael  Wemyss  of  that  Ilk, 
through  mistake  by  our  historians  called  David,  who,  with  his  neighbour  Sir  Mi- 
chael Scott  of  Balwyrie,  "  equites  Fifani  illustres,  St  summne  prudentiae  apud  suos  illis 
"  temporibus  habiti,"  were  sent  by  the  states  of  the  kingdom  to  bring  over  from 
Norway  Margaret  the  young  Queen  of  Scotland,  who  died  in  her  way  at  the 
Orkneys,  which  gave  rise  to  the  competition  for  the  crown  by  the  Bruce  and  the 
Baliol.  In  testimony  of  this  honourable  embassy,  there  is  still  preserved  in  the 
Houseof  Wemyss  a  silver  basonof  an  antique  fashion,  which  Sir  Michael  Wemyss  got 
from  Eric  King  of  Norway  at  the  time;  and  that  it  was  Sir  Michael,  and  not  Sir  David 
Wemyss,  that  had  the  honour  to  be  employed,  there  is  an  indenture  at  the  monas- 
tery of  Lindores,  in  1292,  "  inter  Dominum  Michaelem  Weems  de  eodem,  militem, 
"  ex  una  parte,  &-  Dominum  Michaelem  Scot  de  Balweary,  militem,  ab  altera^  in 
"  pra;sentia  Johannis  Dei  Gratia  Regis  Scotorum."  < 

2 2d  July  ylpiid  Sanctum  Joharuwm  de  Perth,  Robertus  de  Camburn,  Dorninvs  de 
Balegrenach,  miles.  Who  this  gentleman,  the  Laird  of  Balegrenach,  is,  I  dare  not 
say;  but  I  conjecture  his  heiress  came  to  be  married  to  some  of  the  Murrays  of 
Touchadam,  and  there  is  the  tradition  of  it. 

Johannes  de  Hayia.  The  truth  is  the  name  of  Hay  is  now  so  very  frequent,  I 
cannot  tell  what  this  gentleman  is. 

Hugo  de  Uire.  This  seems  to  be  the  same  name  with  that  of  Hurry,  or  Urie,  of 
which  there  was  a  family  entitled  Pitfichy  in  Aberdeenshire,  which  has  lasted  a 
long  while  there,  and  had  been  very  well  allied  to  the  best  famihes  in  the  North. 
General  Hurry  that  had  been  so  long  against  the  king  in  the  Parliament  service, 
and  afterwards  turned  so  eminently  for  the  king,  and  suffered  the  next  day  after 
the  execution  of  the  great  Marquis  of  Montrose,  was  the  last  heir  of  the  family. 
He  had  two  daughters,  his  heirs,  the  one  married  to  Archibald  Lament  of  that  Ilk, 
;;nd  the  other  to  Dr  John  Hamilton,  Parson  of  Leith,  and  Bishop  of  Dunkeld,  at 
the  Revolution.     Ibidem,  says  the  author,  25th  July. 

Johannes  de  Moncrief,  Chevalier.  This  is  the  family  that  were  the  Moncriefs  of 
that  Ilk,  a  family  of  good  antiquity.  There  is  a  charter  of  confirmation  yet  ex- 
tant of  the  lands  of  Moncrief,  Johanni  de  Moncrief,  by  King  Alexander  III.  The 
House  of  Moncrief  continued  in  the  possession  of  the  estate  till  King  Charles  II.'s 
time,  that  Sir  John  Moncrief  of  that  Ilk  sold  the  estate  of  Moncrief  to  a  gentleman 
of  his  name,  Sir  Thomas  Moncrief  one  of  the  Clerks  of  Exchequer,  though  the 
blood  and  chieftainry  is  in  Moncrief  of  Tippermalloch,  who  is  the  heir-male  of  the 
family  of  Moncrief,  whose  grandfither  was  Mr  Hugh  ^toncrief  of  Tippermalloch, 
the  famous  physician,  and  he  was  the  second  son  of  Sir  WilHam  Moncrief  of  that 
Uk  by  his  lady,  who  was  a  daughter  of  the  ancient  family  of  Abercairny. 

Robertus  Camburn  de  Balnely:  This  is  another  Camburn;  but  what  the  sur- 
name afterwards  turned  out  to  be,  or  if  it  is  the  same  with  Cameron,  I  cannot  say  ; 
1  leave  that  to  those  who  are  better  acquainted  with  the  etymology  of  the  Irish 
language,  who  can  best  judge  of  those  matters. 

Alexander  de  Abernethy :  This  I  take  to  be  the  same  Sir  Alexander  Abernethy 
of  Balinbrigh,  of  whom  we  have  said  already. 

Apud  Cluniacenses,  17th  July,  Dominus  Archihcddus  de  Livingston,  miles,  no  doubt 
is  Livingston  of  that  Ilk,  whose  ancestors  appear  as  early  as  the  time  of  King 
David.  This  family  subsisted  till  the  la:t  Bartholomew  Livingston  of  that  lik 
was  slain  at  the  battle  of  Flodden,  and  his  sisters  were  co-heirs.  In  the  reign  of 
King  David  II.  Sir  William  Livingston  of  Callender  was  a  brother  of  the  family, 
and  Sn-  Andrew  Livingston  of  Drumray  was  another  branch.  He  got  the  estate  of 
Easter- Wemyss  in  Fife,  by  marriage  of  one  of  the  co-heirs  of  the  estate  of  Wemyss 
of  that  Ilk.  The  last  Sir  Robert  Livingston  of  Easter- Wemyss  v/as  slain  at  Flod- 
den, and  left  a  daughter,  Margaret,  his  sole  heir,  who  married  Sir  James  Hamilton 
of  Fennart.  He,  with  consent  of  his  wife,  exchanged  the  estate  of  Drumray  in 
Dumbartonshire,  with  the  lands  of  Crawfordjohn,  with  Lawrence  Crawford  of  Kil- 
bimy,  27th  January  1529. 

JJjannes  de  Strivelyn,  miles :  This  is  the  knight  of  Glenesk,  which  estate,  in 
King  David  II.'s  time,  came  to  Katharine  Stirling,  daucrhter  of  Sir  Alexander 
Stilling  of  Glenesk,  who  was  married  to  Sir  Alexander  Lindsay,  sen   to  Sir  David 


ON  THE  RAGMAN-ROLL.  zr. 

Lindsay  of  Cvctwford,  whose  son  was  Daviil  ilie  first  Earl  of  Crawfoid,  an/io  1390. 
Anothei-  of  the  co-heiis  of  Gleiiesk  is  married,  to  Duncamis  de  AiboUfi,  who  I  be- 
lieve is  one  of  the  ancestors  of  the  House  of  Struan  Robertson. 

6th  July,  Hui;o  de  Mornvia  :  This  was  the  forebearer  of  the  Murrays  of  Coubin, 
whose  name  at  that  time  is  Hugh,  and  a  brother  of  the  House  of  DuHus,  as  from 
his  original  cjiarter  I  have  seen  (a). 

7th  July.  Apud  Ftrriil,  IVillidnius  Fraser,filiiis  quondam  Alexandri  Fraser.  The 
name  of  Fraser,  like  the  Hays  at  that  time,  are  so  numerous  and  so  frequent  that 
you  can  scarce  distinguish  them.  I  cannot,  with  any  sort  of  probability,  plate 
this  gentleman  to  any  of  all  the  families  of  the  Erasers,  whether  Tweeddale,  Touch, 
or  the  north  country  Erasers,  I  cannot  say. 

7th  Junii,  Witnesses  to  King  John's  renunciation  of  the  kingdom  of  Scotland, 
in  castro  Biichenen  coram  Antonio  Episcopo  Diinelm.  that  was  Bishop  Beck  of  Dur- 
ham, who  is  Attor'ney  for  the  King  of  England,  where  he  made  a  solemn,  and, 
as  I  believe  he  was  forced  to  call  it,  a  willing  surrender  and  resignation  of  himself, 
his  whole  kingdom  of  Scotland,  his  royal  dignity,  with  all  heritages,  rights,  and 
appurtenances  thereto  belonging;  as  also,  of  all  his  lands,  possessions,  and  goods, 
moveable  and  unmoveable,  whatsoever :  the  Bishop  receiving  them  in  the  name 
of  King  Edward  ;  thereupon  poor  King  John  was  no  more  considered  as  king. 
was  sent  with  his  eldest  son  to  the  Tower  of  London,  where  he  lived  at  the  discre- 
tion of  his  conqueror,  forought  I  can  see,  till  his  death ;  for  though  he  had  abandoned 
and  abdicated  his  kingdom  and  his  subjects,  yet  they  would  not  desert  him,  and  made  ' 
many  struggles  and  efforts  to  regain  him  his  crown  ;  for  when  Sir  William  Wal- 
lace was  chosen  guardian  of  the  kingdom,  it  is  in  nomine  prceclari  principis 
Jobannis  Dei  Gratia  Scotoriim  Regis;  and  this  was  in  1299,.  more  than  three 
years  after  he  had  abdicated  the  throne,  which  was  vacant,  as  to  him  :  So  inflexi- 
bly loyal  were  the  Scots  in  those  days  to  their  abdicated  prince,  fancying,  it  seems, 
that  nothing  could  dissolve  their  allegiance  to  him.  There  are  witnesses  to  the 
surrender  Johannes  Cumine,  Doniinus  de  Badenocb,  who  is  John  the  tather,  who  was 
King  John's  brother-in-law,  and  by  his  after-conduct  appears  to  have  been  a  right 
good  man  ;  happy  had  it  been  for  his  son  he  had  traced  the  steps  of  his  father, 
he  had  not  come  to  so  dismal  an  end  as  he  met  with,  as  the  reward  of  his  treachery 
and  perfidy  to  so  great  a  prince  as  he  had  laid  a  plot  to  destroy,  I  mean  King- 
Robert  L  But  God  Almighty  preserved  him  to  be  the  great  and  happy  in- 
strument of  dehvering  the  nation  from  slavery,  and  the  yoke  of  a  foreign 
power. 

Dominus  Brianus  fiUus  Allani.  This  being  a  patronymical  designation,  I  cannot 
tell  who  he  is. 

Alexander  Kennedy,  Clerk  and  Chancellor  of  the  kingdom  of  Scotland,  "  ad  hoc 
"  testibus  vocatis  e"t  speciahter  rogatis,"  as  the  instrument  bears. 

Eodem  die,  apud  Monross,  coram  serenissimo  principe  Domino  Edwardo  Rege 
Anglia,  nobilis  vir  Johannes  Cumine  Comes  de  Bttchan  :  This  was  the  second  branch 
of  the  great  family  of  the  Cumins,  and  the  third  earl.  He  was,  as  all  the  rest  of 
his  kindred,  much  in  the  English  interest,  though  he  was  Great  Justiciary  of  Scot- 
land. He  was  forfeited  for  adhering  to  England  in  the  reign  of  King  Robert  L 
He  had  an  heir-female,  who  was  married  to  Sir  Henry  Bellamont,  an  Englishman, 
who,  in  that  right,  called  himself  Comes  de  Biichan.  He  came  in  with  Edward 
Baliol  ;  and,  in  the  Parliament  held  by  him,  mention  is  made  of  this  earl.  But 
the  earldom  of  Buchan  remained  in  the  crown  of  Scotland  till  King  Robert  IL 
gave  it  to  his  son  Alexander  Lord  of  Badenoch  1387. 

Dovenaldiis  Comes  de  Marr  ;  cf  whom  already. 

Dominus  Herbertus  de  Macus-ucell,  miles :  This  is  the  head  of  the  noble  family  of 
Maxwell,  whose  ancestors  had  borne  great  and  high  offices.  The  House  of  Max- 
well and  Nithsdale  are  the  descendants  of  this  great  man  ;  for  whom  see  the. 
Peerage. 

(a)  In  Kilravock's  Collections, 

Vol.  IL  7T 


iz  HISTORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 

Doininus  Johannes  de  Moravia  is  without  doubt  Sir  John  Murray  of  Drunvsar- 
gard,  the  ancestor  of  the  House  of  Abercuirny,  who  was  doing  his  homage  for 
lands  he  held  in  different  shires. 

Dominus  Alexander  Kennedy,  Canonicus  Glas^uen.  This  is  the  same  gentleman 
that  was  Chancellor  to  King  John  ;  of  whom  before. 

Dominus  Nicolaus  de  Hayia  :  This  is  the  head  of  the  illustrious  family  of  the 
Hays  Earls  of  Errol.  He  was  the  first  of  the  House  of  Errol  who  added  a  territorial 
title  to  his  name  ;  Nicolaus  de  Hayia,  Dominus  de  Errol,  when  by  his  charter  and 
deed  he  confirms  "  illam  bovatam  terra;  in  Carse  monachis  de  Cupro,  quam  habu- 
"  erunt  ex  dono  Rogeri  filii  Bauderici,  uno  cum  annuo  redditu,  quem  dicti  mo- 
"  nachi  mihi  reddere  solebant,  de  dicta  terra."  Sir  Gilbert  Hay  of  Errol  was  his 
son,  who  was  made  High  Constable  of  Scotland  by  King  Robert  I.  anno  1316,  on 
the  attainder  of  David  de  Strathholgy,  Earl  of  Athol.  The  family  were  nominated 
and  invested  in  the  degree  of  Lords" of  Parliament,  by  King  James  I.  anno  1429, 
and  Earls  of  Errol  1455  (Vz). 

Dominus  Johannes  Sinclair  de  Herdmanston  :  This  is  a  very  ancient  family  of  the 
Sinclairs,  who  have  long  possessed  these  lands,  of  which  I  have  seen  transumpts  of 
the  original  charters,  one  granted  by  "  Ricardus  de  Morville,  Constabularius  Re- 
"  gis  Scotorum,  Henrico  de  Sancto  Claro,"  of  the  lands  of  Herdmanston,  which, 
if  granted  soon  after  the  death  of  Hugh  his  father,  must  be  in  the  1162.  Among 
the  witnesses  are  Robertus  fdius  Warnehaldi,  and  Godofredus  de  Ross,  two  of  the 
vassals  of  the  constables  within  his  barony  of  Cunningham. 

The  same  great  man,  Ricardus  de  Morville,  Constabularius  Scotia,  gives  to  the 
same  Hcnricus  de  Sancto  Claro  another  charter  of  the  privilege  of  Edmond  and 
G\Va&m\c'hd.e\,  filii  bonde,  and  of  their  sons  and  daughters,  and  all  their  descendants, 
for  three  merks.  There  is  another  charter  granted  to  this  very  ancient  family  o^f 
the  Sinclairs,  by  "  VVillielmus  de  Morvile,  Constabularius  Scoti:e,  Henrico  de 
"  Sancto  Claro,"  of  the  lands  of  Carfiae,  of  which  I  say  there  is  a  notorial  tran- 
sumpt  taken  by  John  Sinclair  of  Herdmanston  anno  1434. 

The  next  of  the  line  of  the  family  is  Allanus  de  Sancto  Claro,  who  is  seemingly 
the  son  of  Henry,  who  had  a  charter  of  confirmation  by  "  Rolandus,  filius  Uch- 
"  tredi,  Allano  de  Sancto  Claro,"  of  his  predecessor  William  Morville's  charters; 
which  charters  are  still  preserved  in  the  custody  of  a  noble  person,  the  lineal  heir 
of  the  family. 

The  next  of  the  family,  and  the  first  that  used  the  territorial  designation  of  Do- 
minus de  Herdmanston,  is  the  Joannes  de  Sancto  Claro  Doininus  de  Herdmanston  men- 
tioned in  this  record,  who  now  swears  an  oath  of  allegiance  and  fealty  to  the 
King  of  England. 

The  next  of  this  race  of  the  Sinclairs  is  Sir  Mlliam  de  Sancto  Claro,  Dominus  de 
Hermiston,  who  was  one  of  those  noble  and  glorious  patriots  who  sided  with  the_ 
immortal  deliverer  of  Scotland,  King  Robert  the  Bruce,  who,  for  the  merit  of 
his  valiant  and  heroic  services  at  the  famous  and  decisive  battle  of  Bannockburn, 
got  from  the  king  a  sword,  on  the  broad  side  of  which  these  words  were  engraven 
in  French,  Le  Roy  me  donne,  St  Clair  me  porte  ;  which,  I  have  been  told  by  the 
gentleman  who  should  have  known  it  best,  was  preserved  as  a  monument  of  the 
valour  of  this  gentleman.  So  much  to  the  honour  of  the  family  till  within  these 
hundred  years  or  less  {h). 

This  Sir  William  Sinclair  of  Herdmanston  allied  in  marriage  with  the  other  ancient 
but  far  more  powerful  family  of  the  St  Clairs  of  Roslin,  who  in  truth  exceeded 
most  other  families  in  the  kingdom  for  grandeur  and  wealth.  By  this  noble  lady 
he  had  a  son  the  heir  of  the  family,  John  Sinclair  of  Herdmanston,  who  was  uterine 
brother  to  Margaret,  Countess  of  Marr  and  Angus ;  for,  in  the  1389,  I  have  seen 
a  charter  (c)  by  the  Countess,  in  which  there  is  Joannes  de  Sancto  Claro  de  Her- 
miston f  rater  noster,  and  Joannes  de  Haliburton  Dominus  ejusdem  witnesses.     It  was 

(a)  In  a  charter  to  Walter  OgUvie  of  Deskford,  9th  October  1 455,  et  Williel.  Domino  Keith  Mares- 
callo,  is  not  Comes  Mariscal.       (h}  Dr  Matthew  Sinclair  of  Herdmanston.     (c)  Penes   ducem  de 

Douglas. 


ON  THE  RAGMAN-ROLL.  -3 

:his  John  St  Clair  of  Herdiuanston  that  married  Elizabeth,  the  daughter  and  sole  heir 
of  Sir  Patrick  de  Folwartb  of  Pohvarth,  and  had  Sir  \Villiam  St  Clair  of  Herdman- 
ston,  whose  son  and  heir-apparent,  John  Sinclair,  by  Katliarine  his  wife,  daughter 
of  Sir  Thomas  Plume  of  that  Ilk,  had  an  investiture  of  the  barony  of  Polwarth,  ntmo 
1444.  Itwas  this  John  Sinclair  of  Herdinanston  who,  in  the  1434,  took  the  notorial 
transumpt  of  thecharterby  I  li/Ziamtie  Mjr'-jile, comuihle,  to  Henry  de  Saricto  Claro,  his 
predecessor,  of  the  lands  of  Carfrae,  formerly  mentioned:  but  he  dying  without  issue- 
male,  there  arose  a  dispute  and  a  question  in  law,  anent  the  right  of  succession  to  the 
estate,  betwixt  his  two  daughters,  the  heirs  of  line  and  at  law,  and  his  brother  Sir  Wil- 
liamSinclair,  his  heir-male  («).  At  length,  by  the  mediation  of  their  common  friends, 
the  matter  was  settled  and  composed,  the  heir-male  got  the  ancient  family  estate 
of  Herdmanston,and  the  heirs-female  got  the  estates  of  Pohvarth  and  Kimmergham. 
Marion,  the  eldest,  was  married  to  Sir  George  Hume  of  Wedderburn,  and  Mar- 
garet, the  other,  to  Sir  Patrick  Hume  his  brotlier,  who  got  with  her  the  barony  of 
Polwarth,  which  gave  ground  to  both  these  families  to  quarter  the  coat  of  Sinclair 
with  their  paternal  bearings  of  Hume.  From  this  William  Smclair  of  Herdmanston, 
the  heir-male,  the  House  of  Herdmanston  came  and  continued,  in  a  direct  male  suc- 
cession, till  it  came  to  be  united  with  the  family  of  St  Clair,  in  the  reign  of  King 
Charles  IL  Sir  John  Sinclair  of  Herdmanston  married  John  Sinclair,  his  eldest  son, 
fiar  of  Herdmanston,  to  Mrs  Katharine  Sinclair,  only  daughter  and  sole  heir  of  John 
Lord  Sinclair,  and  had  a  son,  Henry  Lord  Sinclair,  succeeded  his  grandfather  in 
1677  ;  and  had  the  honour  established  to  him  and  his  heirs-male. 

Andreas  de  Charteris  is  next  to  Herdmanston  in  our  i-ecord  :  This  was  most  cer- 
tainly, and  can  be  authentically  vouched,  the  head  of  the  ancient  family  of  the 
Charteris  of  Amistield,  in  the  south  in  Dumfries-shire.  In  ancient  charters  the 
family  are,  in  Latin,  designed  de  Carnoto,  as  may  be  seen  in  the  chartulary  of 
Kelso;  but  that  has  been  the  latinizing  the  name  ;  for,  even  in  very  ancient 
deeds,  when  Carnoto  is  Englished,  it  is  called  Charteris.  This  Andreas  de  Charteris 
was  Baron  of  Amislield  even  at  this  time  ;  for  after  this  gentleman  had  made  his 
forced  submission  to  the  king  of  England  he  retracted  it  again,  for  which  he  was 
forfeited  by  King  Edward  L  ;  for  Sir  V/illiam  Dugdale,  in  his  Baronage  of  Eng- 
land, mentions  a  gift  to  an  English  gentleman  of  the  lands  of  Amistield  in  Scot- 
land, which  was  in  his  hands  by  forfeiture  of  Andrew  Charteris  1296. 

IMlliam  de  Charteris  is  one  of  those  barons  who,  in  the  1306,  did  homage  to 
the  King  of  England,  for  the  lands  he  held  in  the  county  of  Dumfries,  and  ap- 
pears to  be  the  son  of  the  former  Andrew,  who  had  submitted  as  his  father  had 
done  to  the  invader  of  the  liberties  of  his  country:  But  whatever  submission  he 
made  to  the  king  of  England  he  did  not  think  that  binding  on  him,  for  he  turned 
eminently  to  King  Robert  the  Bruce.  He  seems  to  be  the  same  IMllielmiis  de 
Charteris  who,  with  Walter  de  Perchys,  resigns  the  "  medietatem  totius  baronice 
"  de  Witon  in  vicecomitatu  de  Roxburgh,  in  favorem  Henrici  de  Wardlaw  ;" 
upon  which  he  had  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal,  to  be  seen  in  the  rolls.  This 
does  very  authentically  establish  the  great  antiquity  of  the  House  of  Amisfield, 
which,  from  authentic  vouchers,  can  be  deduced  from  those  times  to  our  own 
days.  The  representative  of  the  family  was  Colonel  Francis  Charteris  of  Amis- 
field,  whose  only  daughter  is  Janet  Countess  of  Wemyss. 

Alexander  de  Airth  :  This  was  an  ancient  family  in  Stirlingshire,  that  continued 
long  in  lustre  there  ;  they  had  the  baronies  of  Airth, 'Carnock,  and  Plain,  which, 
in  the  reign  of  King  James  L  came  to  heirs-female,  and,  by  marriage,  to  the 
Bruces,  Drummonds,  and  Somervilles. 

H//^o  de  Riddel,  miles  :  This  is  the  ancient  House  ofRiddell  of  that  Ilk,  that  have 
been  a  family,  from  authentic  vouchers,  from  King  Malcolm  IV.'s  time,  or  King 
David  l.'s  days,  from  writs  I  have  seen. 

Dominus  Nicolaus  de  Rutherford  is  the  ancestor  of  the  Rutherfords  of  that  Ilk, 
who  came  to  be  designed  Domini  ejiisdem  in  King  Robert  II. 's  time.  They  were 
a  family  of  reputation,  and  held  the  most  part  of  their  estate  of  the  Earls  of  Dou- 
glas.    The  family  split  betwixt  an  heir-male  and  heirs  of  line,  in  King  James  IV.'s 

(<2)  Registers  of  Parliament, 


24  HISTORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 

reign.  Rutherford  of  EJgerston  was  the  heir-male,  and  now  represents  the  pnr. 
ci]xil  oriniiial  family  ;  and  the  Earl  of  Traquair  is  the  heir  of  line,  who  carries  the 
arms  of  Rutherford  in  liij  achievement. 

Ri-idulphtis  dc  LgUnton,  miles,  was  the  ancestor  of  the  House  of  Eglinton,  which 
ended  in  an  heir-female,  Elizaheth,  the  daughter  and  the  heir  of  Sir  Hugh  Eg- 
linton of  that  Ilk,  Justiciai-y  of  Lothian,  in  the  reign  of  King  David  II.,  who  was 
married  to  Sir  John  IMontgomery  of  Eaglesham,  predecessor  of  the  Earls  of  Eglin- 
ton, who  on  that  account  quarters  the  arms  of  Eglinton  with,  his  own.  name  of 
Montgomery. 

John  de  Etphingston :  This  is  the  ancestor  of  the  ancient  family  of  Elphinstone 
of  that  Ilk.  Alexander  de  Elphingston,  his  son,  got  the  lands  of  Airthbeg  from 
Agnetta  de  Airtb  matre  sua  :  Then  Alexander  Elphinstone,  Dominus  ejusdem,  ex- 
changed the  lands  of  Airthbeg  with  Alexander,  son  of  Sir  Adam  More,  in  1362. 
He  had  his  successor.  Sir  William  Elphinstone,  Dominus  ejusdem,  who  gets  a  char- 
ter from  Sir  William  Lindsay,  Dominus  de  Byres,  of  the  lands  he  held  of  him.  The 
descent  is  limited  to  the  heirs-male  of  his  body;  and,  in  failm-e  of  these,  to  Alex- 
ander, Norman,  and  James,  his  brothers,  and  their  heirs-male,  anno  1399.  His 
son  Alexander,  designed  Dominus  ejusdem,  was  slain  at  the  battle  of  Piperden  in 
1437.  -^^^  '^^"'-  ^  daughter,  Janet:  whereupon  there  arose  a  great  competition 
anent  the  succession  to  the  estate,  betwixt  her  and  Henry  Elphinstone,  of  Pitten- 
dreich,  which,  in  the  1477,  was  settled  by  solemn  arbitration.  The  heir  of  line 
married  Sir  Gilbert  Johnston,  a  brother  of  the  House  of  Johnston,  who  was  after- 
wards slain  at  Flodden,  and  he  got  the  estate  of  Elphinstone  in  Lothian,  and  was 
the  root  of  the  Johnstons  of  Elphinstone.  The  heir-male,  Henry  Elphinstone, 
got  all  the  rest  of  the  estates,  Pittendreich,  Airthbeg,  Strickshaw,  &c.  all  the 
estate  that  was  held  of  the  Lord  Lindsay,  of  which  he  had  a  charter  in  the  1477, 
to  himself  in  liferent,  and  to  John  Elphinstone  his  grandson,  and  heir  of  the  de- 
ceased James  Elphinstone,  his  eldest  son  ;  and  failing  his  heirs-male,  to  Andrew 
Elphinstone,  his  own  son,  who  is  afterwards  designed  of  Selms.  John,  the  grand- 
son, got  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal,  in  the  1508,  erecting  the  lands  of  Airth- 
beg into  a  barony,  called  baronia  de  Elphingston.  Sir  Alexander  Elphinstone  of 
that  Ilk,  his  son,  rose  to  high  favour  with  King  James  IV.,  who  raised  him  to  be 
a  peer,  viz.  Lord  Elphinstone,  anno  1511.  He  personated  the  king  at  the  battle 
of  Flodden,  where  he  was  also  slain.  Charles  Lord  Elphinstone  is  lineally  come  of 
this  first  lord. 

Godofrediis  de  Ardrossan  :  This  was  the  ancestor  of  the  old  House  of  Ardrossan 
in  Cunningham,  who  seem  to  have  been  the  ancient  possessors,  as  far  back  as  sur- 
names began. 

Arthurus  de  Ardrossan  is  witness  to  a  charter' Hugoni  de  Crawford  de  terris  de  Mo- 
nock,  in  1226.  Then  Fergusius  de  Ardrossan,  who  I  take  to  be  the  son  ot  the 
former,  gets  a  charter  erecting  his  own  estate,  and  the  estate  of  William  Ker,  and 
Richard  de  Boyle,  which  is  the  lands  of  Kersland  and  Rysholme,  who  were  his 
vassals,  "  in  unam  integram  &  Hberam  baroniam,  baroniam  de  Ardrossan,"  as 
trom  the  charter  in  the  rolls  of  .King  Robert  the  Bruce.  His  estate  came  by  his 
heir-female  to  the  Eglintons  of  that  Ilk ;  both  the  estates  came  to  centre  in  Sir 
John  Montgomery  of  Eagleshame. 

13th  July  Dominus  Johannes  de  Strivelyn  de  Moravia.  This  I  take  to  be  the 
Stiiiings  of  Glenesk,  which  came  by  marriage  to  the  Lindsays. 

Normanus  de  Lescelyne,  i.  e.  Leslie;  who  I  take  to  be  the  first  of  the  Leslies  that 
settled  in  Fife,  of  whom  is  come  the  House  of  Rothes;  they  got  Banbregh  by  the 
heiress  of  an  Abernethy,  for  which  they  quarter  their  arms. 

Johannes  de  Glenesk.  I  suppose  this  is  the  Glenesks  of  that  Ilk,  of  whom  I  can- 
not say  any  thing,  or  how  they  ended. 

Alexander  de  Straiton  is  without  doubt  the  Straitens  of  Lauriston,  who  were  a 
good  family  in  the  Merns;  but  they  are  now  decayed,  though  some  Straitons,  par- 
ticularly Straiton  of  Kirkside,  are  standing,  and  are  come  of  Lauriston. 

Gilbertus  de  Hayia  is,  I  apprehend,  the  same  noble  person  that  is  at  that  time 
head  of  the  family  of  Lochquharrat.  It  was  this  Sir  Gilbert  Hay  of  Lochquharrat, 
who,  with  Sir  Alexander  Seaton  and  Sir  Neil  Campbell,  entered  into  a  solemn 
association,  anno  1308,  to  defend  the   liberties  of  their  country,  and  the  right  of 


ON  THE  RAGMAN-ROLL.  25 

King  Robert  the  Bruce,  against  all  mortals,  French,  English,  and  Scots.  The 
Marquis  of  Tweeddale  is  the  lineal  heir  of  this  great,  noble,  and  heroic  person. 

Jacobus  lie  MakvUle.  This  is  the  branch  of  the  Melvillcs,  as  I  take  it,  who 
came  to  be  intitled  Melville  of  Glcnbcrvie,  of  whom  were  come  the  Mclvilles  of 
Cairnbie  and  Dysart,  of  whom  again  issued  the  two  learned  divines  of  tiie  name  of 
Melville,  Mr  Andrew  and  Mr  James  Melvilles,  of  whom  our  ecclesiastical  histories 
are  so  full,  and  were  so  zealous  for  the  pre^byterian  scheme  of  discipline.  The 
House  of  Glenbervie  came  to  an  heiress  in  the  time  of  King  James  II.  who  was 
married  to  Sir  James  Auciiinleck  of  that  Ilk,  in  Kyle,  by  whose  grandchild  and 
lineal  heir,  Elizabeth  Auchiuleck,  tlie  barony  of  Glenbervie  came  by  marriage  to 
Sir  William  Douglas,  son  to  the  Earl  of  Angus,  of  whom  is  lineally  descended  the 
Duke  of  Douglas. 

The  17th  July  Duncanus  de  Fretidrau_ght.  This  is  a  great  barony  in  Aberdeen- 
shire, which  from  the  Frendraughts  came  to  the  Erasers,  a  branch  of  die  House  of 
Lovat;  Jacohus  Eraser  Dominus  de  Frendraiight,  in  1404,  mortifies  liis  lands  of 
Cambeston,  in  baronia  de  Lessuden,  to  the  monastery  of  Melrose  («);  by  hjs  heir- 
female  it  came  to  Alexander  Dunbar,  son  to  Thomas  Earl  of  Murray,  whose  son, 
James  Earl  of  Murray,  having  no  lawful  issue-male,  his  eldest  daughter,  Janet, 
brought  that  barony  to  Sir  James  Crichton,  son  to  William  Lord  Crichton,  wlio 
was  invested  in  the  honour  of  Earl  of  Murray,  after  the  forfaulture  of  Archibald 
Douglas,  his  brother-in-law,  in  1451.  But  he  gave  over  the  esstate  of  the  earldom, 
and  relinquished  the  title  of  earl(/();  Wdliam  Lord  Crichton,  their  son,  being, 
forfaulted  in  1483,  the  barony  of  Frendrauglit  came  to  James  Crichton  his  son, 
en  the  resignation  of  Janet  Duubar  the  Countess  of  Murray,  his  grandmother,. 
1492. 

Patricuis  de  Berkley.  The  surname  of  Barclay  was  then  so  numerous  that  they  are 
not  easily  distinguishable;  for  there  are  several  Barclays  in  the  North,  and  in  Fife, 
and  there  is  Hugo  de  Barclay,  who  in  1284  is  Justiciarius  Laudon'ue.  I  take  hini 
to  be  the  Barclay  who  had  "the  half  of  the  barony  of  Crawfordjohn,  and  came  to 
be  promiscuously  designed  Dominus  dimidire  partis  baronia  de  Crawfurd-John,  and 
Bominus  baronia  de  Kilbirney  i^  de  Lady-Land,  which,  in  the  1471,  came  to  the 
Crawfurds  by  marriage,  of  whom  are  the  House  of  Kilbirny,  now  Viscount  of 
Garnock,  who  carries  the  coat  of  Barclay  impaled  at  first,  but  now  quartered  with 
Crawfurd. 

Hugo  de  la  Hay.     What  Hay  this  is  I  cannot  say. 

Reginaldus  le  Chein.  The  Cheynes  were  great  men;  there  is  Reginaldus  de 
Chein,  Chamberlain,  and  Reginald  le  CJjein,  filius;  their  barony  of  Inverugie  came, 
by  a  co-heiress  of  them,  to  a  son  of  the  Keith  family,  and  by  another  co-heiress 
came  the  barony  of  Duft'us  to  a  son  of  the  Eajl  of  Sutherland,  of  whom  sprung 
the  Lord  Duftus. 

Johannes  filius  Herberti  de  Macuswell.  This  is  John  the  son  of  Sir  Herbert  Max- 
well of  Carlaverock,  of  whom  already  in  the  Maxwell  family. 

IVillielmus  de  Monte  Alto,  miles.  This  is  the  surname  of  Mowat,  of  which  the 
principal  family  is  reputed  to  have  been  Mowat  of  Balquhollie  in  Aberdeenshire. 
There  were  also  two  families  in  the  west,  Mowat  of  Stanehouse  in  Clydesdale,  and 
Mowat  of  Busbie  in  Cunningham,  both  families  of  good  respect,  and  well  allied  ; 
but  they  are  now  both  decayed,  the  last  but  about  a  century  ago. 

Robertas  de  Walyhop,  i.e.  Wauchope.  There  was  an  ancient  familyof  this  surname, 
designed  of  Coulter,  of  which  lands  they  had  charters  from  King  Alexander  II, 
which  came  to  the  Cumins  by  the  marriage  of  an  heiress.  I  have  not  seen  writs 
to  connect  the  Wauchope's  of  Niddry-Marischal  with  them;  but  when  they  came 
of  them  I  caimot  say. 

Robertus  le  Falconer  is  doubtless  one  of  the  ancestors  of  the  House  of  Halkerton, 
who  have  charters  to  vouch  the  antiquity  ot  their  family,  as  far  up  as  the  days 
of  King  William;  for  which  see  the  Peerage  of  Scotland.  They  were  made  lords 
in  1647. 

(a)  Chartulary  of  Melrose.       {b)  Manuscript  out  of  the  Library  of  Culross. 

Vol.  U.  7  U 


i6  HISTORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 

19th  July,  Commiinitas  villa  de  Aberdeen,  etiam  Willielmus  de  Mof-nvla,  miles. 
Whether  this  be  the  IVillielmus  de  Mjravia  de  Drumsargard,  or  the  Willielmns  de 
Moravia,  miles,  de  Ttdlibardin,  1  daie  not  venture  to  say. 

Dominus  Johannes  de  Maleville,  miles.  This  is  thought,  upon  good  presump- 
tions, to  be  the  other  family  of  the  Melvilles  of  Raith,  in  Fife,  of  whom  a  line  may 
be  deduced,  till  they  came  to  be  Earls  of  Melville  in  1690,  and  the  dignity  is  con- 
joined with  that  of  Earl  of  Leven,  in  the  person  of  Alexander,  the  present  Earl  of 
Leven  and  Melville. 

2 2d  July,  jipud  Bamff,  D.  Thomas  de  Torthorald.  This  seemingly  is  another 
branch  of  the  Torthorald  family,  of  whom  already. 

Apiid  El^in  in  Moravia,  there  swore  fealty  to  King  Edward  Robertits  Episcopus 
GUtscuensis.  This  is  the  celebrated  Bishop  Wishart,  who  acted  so  gloriously  the 
patriot;  and  though  he  swore  fealty  to  the  conqueror,  yet  he  did  not  think  that 
oath  binding  upon  him,  for  no  sooner  did  the  Earl  of  Carrick  set  the  crown  on  his 
head  but  he  gave  him  all  possible  countenance  and  support.  He  mightily  ani- 
mated his  countrymen  to  shake  off  the  English  yoke,  by  his  preaching  and  ex- 
ample ;  in  the  course  of  the  war  he  was  taken  prisoner  in  armour,  as  the  King  of 
England  represents  to  the  Pope  ;  and  if  it  had  not  been  for  disobliging  his  Holiness, 
he  would  certainly  have  put  him  to  death.  He  was  sent  first  to  the  court  of 
Rome,  and  from  thence  to  England,  where  he  remained  a  prisoner,  till  he  was  re- 
leased and  exchanged  for  English  prisoners,  after  the  battle  of  Bannockburn,  He 
survived  all  his  disasters,  and  died  in  1316. 

Nobilis  vir  Alexander  Comes  de  Monteith.  He  was  the  second  earl  of  this  line, 
who  were  Stewarts  by  blood,  though  Monteith  by  surname,  of  whom  see  the 
Peerage  of  Scotland.  Johannes  de  Monteith,  Dominus  de  K?iapdale  iH  de  Arran,  in 
King  David's  time,  1  apprehend  was  come  of  a  younger  son  of  his. 

Dominus  Thomas  de  Soulis.  This  is  for  certain  a  branch  of  the  Soulis  of  Liddis- 
dale,  who  were  forfaulted  for  treason  in  King  Robert  L's  time,  and  their  estate 
came  to  Sir  flllliam  de  Douglas,  designed  in  many  deeds  Dominus  vallis  de  Lides- 
dale. 

Johannes  IMshard.  There  were  two  very  ancient  families  of  the  name,  Wishatrt 
of  Pittarrow,  and  Wishart  of  Logic ;  Pittarrow  is  said  to  be  the  root  of  the  family ;  yet 
Logic  is  so  ancient,  that  they  have  a  charter  from  Gilbertus  de  Umphravile  comes  de 
Angus  in  1272.  The  lands  of  Conveth  were  in  ancient  possession  of  the  Wisharts  of 
Pittarrow.  In  the  chartulaiy  of  Arbroath  there  is  a  charter  by  the  abbot  to  Sir  John 
Wishart  of  the  Mill  of  Conveth,  in  the  1242,  to  which  Dominus  Hugo  de  Weyms  is 
a  witness.  I  have  seen  a  long  and  well  vouched  descent  of  the  House  of  Pittarrow. 
James  Wishart  of  Pittarrow  was  Lord  Advocate  and  Clerk  of  Justiciary  to  King 
James  IV.  Mr  George,  his  second  son,  was  our  first  martyr  for  the  Protestant  re- 
ligion at  the  breaking  out  of  the  Reformation.  Sir  John  Wishart  of  Pittarrow  was  a 
zealous  reformer,  and  was  Comptroller  of  Scotland  under  Queen  Mary  1567.  He 
•was  succeeded  by  his  nephew  by  his  brother,  in  whose  Hne  the  family  ended  in 
King  Charles  L's  time. 

Gervasius  de  Rate  is  the  ancestor  of  the  Raits  of  Halgreen,  which  is  reputed  an 
ancient  family  in  the  Merns. 

Alexander  de  Ergyl,  of  whom  already,  and  Nicolaus  de  Soulis,  militibus.  This  is 
the  name  of  the  head  of  the  family  of  Soulis,  in  the  south,  and  Lords  of  Liddisdale, 
long  ago  worn  out.  There  is  a  tradition  that  Kilmarnock  in  Cunningham  belong- 
ed to  them,  and  that  the  Boyds  came  to  it  upon  tlieir  forfaulture,  though  they 
were  but  the  vassals.     Bahols  are  barons  of  Cunningham. 

Burgenses  de  Elgin,  et  Allanus  de  Murriff,  of  whom  I  can  give  rro  account  ;  but 
Allan  being  a  name  among  the  Murrays  of  Coubin,  I  presume  it  might  be  one  of 
them.  They  ended  in  an  heiress,  who  was  married  to  a  gentleman  of  the  name 
of  Kinnaird,  who  was  the  ancestor  of  these  Kinnairds  of  Coubin,  who,  little  more 
than  a  century  ago,  if  so  much,  lost  their  estate,  by  its  being  blown  over  with 
sand  from  the  sea,  in  one  night,  as  I  have  heard. 

28th  of  July,  Dominus  Johannes  de  Sancto  Michale  :  Who  this  is  I  know  not,  if 
it  be  not  Carmichael,  who  in  some  deeds,  it  is  said,  are  called  St  Michael. 

Dominus  Robertus  de  Normanville.  This  is  a  very  ancient  family  of  the  Norman 
extraction,  and  were  very  ancient  among  us.     In  time  they  came  to  be  Barons  of 


ON  THE  RAGMAN-ROLL.  27 

Gargunnock  in  the  shire  of  Stirling,  the  name  came  to  be  called  Norvel ;  there  is 
none  of  them  remaining  now,  but  the  heir  of  entail  of  Mr  George  Norvel  of  Bog. 
hail,  near  Bathgate  in  Linlithgowshire. 

Dominus  j4dam  de  Gordon,  miles,  one  of  the  ancestors  of  the  illustrious  House 
of  Gordon.     Of  whom  there  is  a  particular  history,  to  which  I  refer. 

JMllielmtis  Dictus  IViseman.  1  never  heard  of  any  body  of  the  name  but  mean 
people,  excepting  a  minister  lately  at  Monkland,  who  adopted  a  son  of  one  Cross, 
and  left  him  his  means  and  estate. 

Alexander  de  Hately  is  no  doubt  the  ancestor  of  an  ancient  family  in  the  Merse, 
styled  of  Mellerstane,  but  some  time  ago  extinct. 

Jacobus  Jilius  Godofredi  de  Ross  Senior,  and  Jncohus  fiUus  Godofredi  de  Ross 
Junior.  These  are  two  of  the  ancestors  of  the  Rosses  of  Tarbet  in  Cunningjiam, 
the  ancestors  of  the  Lord  Ross  of  Halkhead,  who  made  a  great  figure  in  tlie  wars 
that  ensued  on  Kmg  John's  abdication.  SirGodefride,  the  son,  called  ////uj-,  to  dis- 
tinguish him  from  his  father,  who  was  in  action  with  him,  were  brave  gal- 
lant men,  and  firm  friends  to  King  Robert,  in  whose  reign  he  was  a  while  Fice- 
comes  de  Air:  SirGodefride,  a  third  of  them,  made  a  great  figure  under  King 
David,  whose  brother,  Sir  John  Ross,  had  a  charter  from  Robert  Karl  of  Strathern, 
his  consanguineus,  of  the  lands  of  Hacket,  which  lie  in  haronia  de  RinJ'rew,  anno 
1367.  The  elder  branch  failing  in  the  reign  of  King  James  III.  the  two  Houses 
of  Tarbet  and  Halkhead  came  to  unite  and  centre  in  one  family;  they  attained  to 
be  Lords  in  1500.     Their  lineal  heir-male  is  George  Lord  Ross. 

Robertus  de  Turnbulye.  This  may  be  the  surname  of  TurnbuU  ;  but  the  origin 
of  the  name,  according  to  the  account  that  is  given,  is  of  a  later  origin.  The  tra- 
dition is,  that  one  of  the  name  of  Rule  turned  a  bull  by  the  head,  and  wrung  off" 
his  neck,  that  was  pushing  violently  at  King  Robert  I.  while  he  was  hunting  in 
the  forest  of  Callender,  then  called  the  forest  of  Cumbernauld ;  for  which  he  was 
called  TurnbuU,  and  got  for  the  merit  of  that  service  the  lands  of  Bedrule  in 
Teviotdale.  This  seems  the  more  probable,  because  there  is  a  charter  granted  by 
King  Robert  the  Bruce,  Willielmo  dicto  Turnbiil,  of  several  lands,  and  is  extant  in 
the  rolls.  The  TurnbuUs  came  to  branch  out  into  two  different  families.  Turn- 
bull  of  Bedrule  and  TurnbuU  of  Mmto ;  of  the  first  was  Dr  William  TurnbuU, 
Secretary  to  King  James  H.  and  Bishop  of  Glasgow.     He  died  in  1452. 

29th  July,  John  Wysbard  del  Mernis.  This  is  for  certain  the  Wishart  of  Pit- 
tarrow,  of  whom  already. 

Andreas,  filius  Godofredi  de  Ross.  This  was,  as  is  conjectured,  the  ancestor  of 
the  Rosses  of  Henning,  and  Galston,  and  Mongreenan. 

Alexander  de  Hogston.  There  was  a  family  designed  Hog  of  Hogston  as  low 
down  as  in  the  reign  of  King  James  HL  I  have  seen  a  charter  of  alienation  by 
Alexander  Hog  of  Hogston  to  Sir  Alexander  Hume  of  that  Ilk;  but  1  cannot 
positively  say  that  this  gentleman  here  and  these  other  people  are  the  same :  it  is 
only  a  conjecture. 

Rudolpbus  de  Kinnaird  is  the  ancestor  of  the  Kinnairds  of  that  Ilk,  of  whom,  on 
the  title  of  Lord  Kinnaird,  in  the  Peerage. 

5th  August,  A[>ud  Arbroth,  Marcus  de  Clypan  is  no  question  the  predecessor  of 
the  family  of  the  Clephans  of  Carslogie  in  Fife,  reputed  a  right  ancient  family. 
He  seems  to  be  the  same  Marcus  de  Clyphan  who  is  witness  to  several  charters  yet 
extant,  granted  about  that  time  by  Alexander  de  Abernetby,  out  of  Banbrcght.  I 
have  seen  a  copy  of  a  charter  by  "  Duncanus  Comes  de  Fife,  Johanni  de  Clephan 
"  et  haeredibus  suis,  de  terris  de  Carslogy  tenend.  adeo  libere  sicut  David  de 
"  Clyphan  pater  ejus  et  praedecessores  tenuerunt.  Testibus  Dominis  Alexandro 
"  de  Abernethy,  Michaele  de  Weems,  David  de  Weems,  Hugone  de  Locliore, 
"  Johanne  de  Ransay,  Willielmo  de  Ramsay,  et  Henrico  de  Ramsay,  cum  multis 
"  aliis."  I  take  this  to  be  Duncan  the  last  Earl  of  File,  and  before  the  battle  of 
Durham  in  1346.     The  family  is  still  existing. 

Waherus  Abbas  de  Paslytb.  He  succeeded  one  William  in  the  office,  and  was 
succeeded  by  another  Roger  Abbas  de  Paslyth  in  1312. 

Adam  Abbas  Sancte  Crucis,  who  succeeded  to  Radulphus  in  that  place,  Pat.  Abbas 
de  Cumbuskenneth,  Gilbertus' Abbas  de  Kylinross,  that  is  Culross,  otherwise  designed 
Abbatia  Sancti  Servant,  or  St  Serff  its  patron  saint,  H^illielmus  Abbas  Sancti  Ed- 


2iJ  HISTORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 

ivardi  de  Balmerinoch,  founded  by  Queen  Emergarda,  mother  to  King  Alexandes 
II.  anno  1229,  and  planted  with  monks  of  the  Cistertian  order  that  came  from  the 
abbacy  of  Melrose  "  Radulphus  Abbas  de  Dunferniling,  Andreas  Abbas  de  Cu- 
"  pro,  Johannes  Abbas  de  Newbottle,  Thomas  Abbas  de  Lindoris,  Bernard  Abbas 
"  de  Kilwmning,  Bnanus  Abbas  de  St  Colme,  Johannes  Abbas  de  Jedworth,  Wil- 
"  lielmus  Abbas  de  Dryburgh,  Patricius  Abbas  de  Melrose,  Ricardus  Abbas  de 
"  Kelso,  Henricus  Abbas  de  Arbioth.  Malyse  Conte  de  Strathern,  John  Conte  de 
"  Buchan,  Alexander  Conte  de  Montieth,  Jacobm  Senescal  de  Escope,  Malcolm 
*'  Conte  de  Levenax,"  of  whom  we  have  given  some  account  already  in  these 
remarks. 

WUiiam  Conte  de  Sutherland,  who  seems  to  be  the  same  Willielmus Jilius  Williel- 
jni  Comitis  de  Sutherland,  who  lived  in  the  reign  of  Alexander  111.  of  whom  the 
Earl  of  Sutherland  derives  his  descent.  There  is  a  writ  by  Archibald,  Bishop  of 
Murray,  narrating  an  ancient  controversy,  "  inter  venerabiles  patres,  praedeces- 
"  sores  nostros,  Gilbertum  Willielmum  et  Walterum  bonae  memoriae,  Episcopos 
"  Cathaniae,  ex  parte  una,  et  nobiles  viros  Willielmum  clarae  memoriae,  et  Willi- 
"  elmum  ejus  filium,  Comites  Sutherlandiie,"  dated  x.  Cal.  Octobris  1275.  On 
this  voucher,  &.C.  the  Earls  of  Sutherland  found  their  claim  of  declarator  of  pre- 
cedency against  the  Earls  of  Crawford,  Errol,  and  Marischal,  all  earls  ranked 
before  them  in  the  rolls  of  Parliament.  The  case  was  remitted  by  the  Parhament 
to  the  Court  of  Session,  to  be  determined  by  them,  and  the  action  is  yet  depend- 
ing. If  this  debate  be  revived,  it  would  be  managed  with  great  learning  and 
exactness,  being  the  concern  of  some  of  the  most  ancient  and  honourable  famihes 
)n  the  kingdom,  wherein  many  curious  questions  would  arise  to  be  debated  and 
determined. 

Johannes  de  Strivelyn  de  Muriff.  This  is  the  same  gentleman  designed  formerly 
de  Moravia. 

IVilliam  de  Muriff,  Si-gnior  de  Sothwel.  This  is  the  great  Lord  or  Baron  Baro  de 
BothiDtl  in  the  county  of  Lanark  ;  they  were  a  branch  of  the  original  family  of 
the  Murrays  of  Dufius.  His  father  was  Walterus  de  Moravia,  designed  Jilius  Wil- 
lielini  de  Moravia,  who  got  first  a  footing  in  the  west,  by  the  marriage  of  the 
heir-female  of  the  Oliphards  Domini  de  Bothwel,  in  the  reign  of  Alexander  II.  His 
son  was  this  gentleman  mentioned  here  in  our  record,  and  is  Dominus  de  Bothwel. 
He  gave  "  capiralo  Glasguen.  patronatum  Ecclesia;  de  Wolston^  ac  Rectoriam 
"  ejusdem  terrie."  Andreas  de  Moravia,  frater  suus,  is  a  witness  to  the  deed,  and 
has  been  his  brother's  successor  in  the  barony  of  BothweU,  and  the  noble  patriot 
that  was  conjunct  guardian  of  Scotland  with  Sir  William  Wallace,  and  was  slain- 
at  the  battle  of  Stirling  in  1297.  His  son.  Sir  Andrew  Murray  of  Bothwell,  was 
Fanitnrius  Scotite,  and  Guardian  and  Regent  of  Scotland  in  the  minority  of 
King  David,  and  died  in  that  high  office.  His  son,  Thomas  de  Moravia,  was  Do- 
minus de  Bothwel,  and  Panitarius  Scotiee,  who  died  in  England,  an  hostage  for  the 
ransom  of  King  David  in  1366,  and  left  a  daughter,  Jean,  who  was  married  to 
Sir  Archibald  Douglas,  Dominus  Galuidie,  who  came  to  be  Earl  of  Douglas  atino 
1388.  Murray  of  Abercairny  is  the  male  representative  of  this  ancient  great 
family  of  the  Rlurrays  of  Bothwell. 

Nicol  Camhel,  01  Neil,  is  the  head  of  the  family  of  Lochow,  and  the  same  noble 
person  who  afterwards  fell  in  so  zealously  with  King  Robert  Bruce,  as  did  also 
Sir  Colin  his  son,  who  is  designed  Colinus  Jilius  Ntgelli  Cambel,  militis,  who  got 
"  pro  homagio  et  servitio  suo  totam  terrani  de  Lochow  et  terram  de  Ardsceodinis, 
"  decimo  Februarii,  anno  regni  regis  nono,  A.  D.  1316."  The  family  have  risen 
ever  since  to  all  the  steps  and  degrees  of  nobility  that  can  be  attained ;  and,  to- 
do  the  family  justice,  for  the  most  part  they  have  been  a  race  of  noble  loyal  pa- 
triots, with  few  exceptions.  They  came  to  be  Lords  of  Parliament  by  King 
James  I,  in  1427,  earls  in  1458,  marquisses  in  1641,  which  was  reduced  by  the 
attainder  of  the  Marquis  of  Argyle,  restored  to  the  honour  of  earl  in  1663,  and 
raised  to  the  rank  of  dukes  in  1 701. 

Johannes  de  Cullentyr  is  one  of  the  ancestors  of  the  Callenders  of  that  Ilk;  which, 
estate  came  to  the  Livingston  family,  by  mar.iage,  in  the  time  of  King  David  LI. 
as  we  have  remarked  more  fully. 

3 


ON  THE  RAGMAX-ROLL.  -y 

^■llcxander  Friselc.  This  is  for  certain  Sir  Alexander  Fraser  of  Cowic,  who  was 
a  man  in  the  highest  favour  with  K.ing  Robert  Bruce,  was  his  Great  Chamberlain, 
and  his  brother  by  marriage,  and  one  of  the  greatest  heroes  about  him.  See  a  full 
account  of  him  m  the  Lives  of  the  Chamberlains  by  Mr  Crawfurd. 

Patrick  Conte  de  la  March  et  dc  DJ.ibar.  He  was  the  tirst  Earl  of  the  Dunbars 
who  took  the  title  of  Earl  of  March;  1  take  it  to  have  been  a  new  creation  to  the 
dignity. 

Aylmer  ds  Hauden.  This  was  the  family  of  Haldane  of  that  Ilk  in  Teviotdalc, 
for  this  is  not  the  name  of  the  ancient  honourable  family  of  Gleneagles  at  this 
time.     They  subsisted  till  the  last  age  before  this,  and  ended  in  an  heiress. 

Thomas  de  Colvyle,  in  ancient  charters  designed  ^/c  Cy/i'/Vt,-;  and,  for  certain,  a 
Norman  family,  and  came  to  Scotland  in  King  David  I.'s  time.  They  were  once 
English  barons,  as  is  evident  from  Sir  W^illiam  Dugdale's  Baronage  of  England. 
The  family  had  great  possessions,  both  at  Oxnam  in  Teviotdale,  and  the  great  ba- 
rony of  Ochiltree  in  Ayrshire,  in  the  west.  The  direct  male  line  failed  in  an  heir 
of  line,  much  about  this  time  when  this  submission  was  made,  who  was  married  to 
Sir  Reginald  Cheyne  of  Inverugie.  Robert  Colvil  of  Oxnam  was  the  heir-male 
at  the  time,  and  is  baro  baronuv  de  Ochiltree  \n  1324  («).  They  kept  the  title 
mostly  of  Oxnam  till  King  James  I.'s  time,  that  they  assumed  the  designation  of 
Ochiltree,  and  were  among  the  greatest  barons  below  the  degree  of  lords  of  Par- 
liament in  the  kingdom.  Sir  William  Colvil  of  Ochiltree  died  in  1502,  and  left 
two  daughters  his  co-heiresses;  Margaret,  who  had  no  issue,  and  Elizabeth,  who 
married  Patrick  Colquhoun,  nephew  to  the  Laird  of  Luss;  and  had  a  daughter, 
Frances  Colquhoun,  who  was  co-heiress  of  Ochiltree,  and  was  married  to  Robert 
Colvil  of  Cleish,  ancestor  to  the  Lord  Colvil  of  Ochiltree,  raised  to  that  honour  in 
the  1651.  The  barony  of  Ochiltree  was  acquired  from  the  co-heiresses,  by  the 
heir-male,  Robert  Colvil  of  Hilton,  whose  son.  Sir  James  Colvil,  exchanged  Ochil- 
tree with  Sir  James  Hamilton  of  Finnart,  for  the  barony  of  Easter- Wemyss.  His 
grandson.  Sir  James  Colvil,  was  created  Lord  Colvil  of  Culross  anno  1609; 
whose  grandson,  James  Lord  Colvil  of  Culross,  died  without  issue  after  the  1635, 
and  the  honour  was  not  after  this  claimed  till  the  1721,  that  James  Colvil  of  Kin- 
cardine, the  heir-male,  to  whom  the  dignity  in  the  tirst  patent  was  limited,  peti- 
tioned his  Majesty  King  George  L  setting  forth  his  title;  and  which  being  referred 
in  course  to  the  House  of  Peers,  his  claim  was  admitted,  and  an  order  directed  to 
the  Lord  Register,  to  inrol  him  in  the  list  of  the  peers,  conform  to  his  patent, 
which  was  done  accordingly. 

Stephen  de  Kilpatrick  is  the  ancestor  of  a  very  ancient  family,  the  Kirkpatricks  of 
Closeburn  in  Nithsdale.  They  have  very  good  vouchers  for  their  antiquity.  In 
the  chartulary  of  Kelso  there  is  to  be  met  with  "  Stephanus  Dominus  Vills  de 
"  Closeburn,  filius  &-  hsres  Domini  Ade  de  Kilpatrick,"  who  comes  to  an  agree- 
ment \v\X.h  the  abbot  of  Kelso,  anent  the  convent's  right  to  the  church  of  Close- 
burn;  it  is  dated  "  die  Mercurii,  proxima  post  festum  puriiicationis  beats  Mariae 
"  Virginis,  1278:"  But  the  family  have  older  evidences  than  this,  a  charter  from 
King  Alexander  IL  Jvoni  de  Kilpatrick  de  terris  de  Closeburn,  formerly  pertaining 
to  his  predecessors.  Roger  de  Kilpatrick,  called  by  Buchanan  Rogerus  de  Cella 
Patricii,  was  one  of  those  who  attended  King  Robert  L  to  Dumfries,  when  the 
perfidious  Cumin  was  then  slain  in  the  church.  Thomas,  his  son,  had  a  charter 
from  the  same  king,  narrating  his  lather's  merit,  and  his  own  services,  of  the  lands 
of  Redburgh,  in  Dumfries-shire,  dated  at  Lochmaben  the  4th  January,  the  14th 
year  of  his  reign.  There  is  an  exact  and  complete  series  of  the  family  from  this 
time  downward  to  the  present  Sir  Thomas  Kirkpatrick  of  Closeburn,  baronet. 

Thomas  de  Torthorald.  There  are  several  of  the  name  in  this  record ;  they  iiad 
Torthorald,  which  came  to  Umphrey  de  Kilpatrick,  ancestor  to  Closeburn,  in  King 
Robert  Bruce's  time,  and  from  them,  by  marriage,  to  the  Carlyles,  who  kept  it 
long  in  their  family. 

Fergus  Macdougal.  This  is  one  of  the  M'Dovvall  people,  who  are  of  the  family 
of  Galloway,  but  which  of  them  I  cannot  say. 

(a)  Great  Chartulary  of  Melrose. 
Vol.  n.  7  X 


p  HISTORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 

Dougal  Macdongal,  del  Conte  de  Wigton;  of  whom  already. 

Alexander  de  Bunkill,  the  Baron  of  Bonkill,  whose  heiress  married  the  ancestor  of 
the  Stewarts  Earls  of  Angus.  The  name  is  not  worn  out  to  this  day,  though  but 
mean  people,  which  shows  it  was  a  surname. 

Richard  le  Scot  de  Murthockston.  This  is  the  ancestor  of  the  great  House  of 
Buccleugh,  now  advanced  to  the  height  of  honours  a  subject  is  capable  of:  It  is 
generally  said  this  gentleman  was  son  to  Sir  Michael  Scott,  and  that  he  married 
the  heiress  oi .Murthockston  in  Lanark.  They  were  barons  of  Murdiston  till  King 
fames  II.'s  time,  that  Sir  Walter  Scott  of  Murdiston  made  an  excambion  of  his 
lands  of  Murdiston  and  Hartwood,  in  the  barony  of  Bothwell,  and  shire  of  Lanark, 
with  Thomas  Inglis  of  Manor,  for  his  lands  of  Branksholm,  Branshaugh,  Goldy- 
tands,  Chihitelaw,  Quhiterigs,  Todshaw-hills,  and  Todshaw-wood,  dated  at  Edin- 
burgh the  23d  July  1446,  which  I  have  seen.  The  family  of  Buccleugh  rose  high 
upon  the  fall  of  the  House  of  Douglas,  and  got  several  of  their  lands  as  the  reward 
of  their  valour  against  them  at  the  battle  of  Arkinholm.  Though  they  were  great 
barons,  yet  they  did  not  attain  to  the  peerage  till  the  reign  of  King  James  VI.  in 
•the  1606.  In  1619  the  family  were  made  earls,  and  they  arrived  to  the  honour  of 
a  duke  in  the  1663. 

Andreas  de  Livingston,  one  of  the  Livingstons  of  that  Ilk,  of  whom  we  have  said 
already. 

William  de  Murreff  de  Drumsargard  seems  to  be  of  the  same  race  of  Murrays  with 
those  of  Bothwell ;  for  the  barony  of  Drumsargard  lies  near  to  Bothwell,  on  the 
other  side  of  the  river  of  Clyde.  This  Willican  de  Moravia  de  Drumsargard  is  made 
mention  of,  not  only  in  this  record,  but  frequently  in  Rymer,  about  this  time. 
There  is  no  question  can  be  made  but  that  Sir  John  de  Moravia  de  Drumsargard 
was  his  son,  since  he  is  designed  by  the  same  local  and  territorial  title,  who,  in  or 
about  the  1299,  or  1300,  married  the  daughter  of  Malise  Earl  of  Strathern,  and 
got  with  the  lady  the  lands  of  Ogilvie,  Abercairny,  Glensherop,  as  from  the  char- 
ter I  have  had  the  honour  to  peruse  in  the  possession  of  James  Murray  of  Aber- 
cairny, the  lineal  heir  of  this  marriage,  and  the  representative  of  that  family. 

IVillielmus  de  Douglas,  the  same  gentleman  that  stood  long  at  a  distance  from 
the  conqueror  of  his  country,  and  the  invader  of  her  liberties,  but  at  length  sub- 
mitted. 

Alisandre  de  Strivelyn  del  Conte  de  Lanerk.  This,  from  vouchers  which  cannot 
be  called  in  question,  is  tlie  head  of  the  family  of  the  Stirlings  of  Calder,  near 
Glasgow,  which  continued  in  good  repute  till  King  James  V.'s  time,  that  it  came 
to  the  House  of  Keir  in  1535,  James  Stirling  of  Keir  being  contracted  to  Janet, 
daughter  and  heir  of  Andrew  Stirling  of  Calder.  Of  the  Stirlings  of  the  House  of 
Calder  are  come  the  Stirlings  of  Craigbarnet,  the  Stirlings  of  Glorat,  the  Stirlings 
of  Law,  the  Stirlings  of  Ballagan,  the  Stirlings  the  barons  of  Achyll,  whose  lineal 
heir  is  William  Stirling  of  Halbertshire. 

William  fitz  Thomas  le  Noble.  The  surname  is  of  great  antiquity.  There  is  a 
charter  in  the  hands  of  the  Duke  of  iMontrose,  by  Radolphus  le  Noble,  and  Thomas 
le  Noble,  his  son,  of  the  lands  of  Tlviston,  i.  e.  Eliston,  in  Edinburghshire,  to  Sir 
David  Graham,  and  Agnes  sponsa  sua,  confirmed  by  King  Alexander  II.  the  5th 
year  of  his  reign,  1253:  For  many  centuries  there  is  no  mention  of  any  of  the 
surname  till  1467,  that  the  Nobles  of  Ferm  had  a  charter  of  the  lands  of  Ferm, 
now  called  the  Coates,  above  Rutherglen.  Their  title  is  now  Ardarden,  above  Dum- 
barton ;  but  if  there  be  any  relation  in  blood  or  descent  of  the  Nobles  of  Ardarden, 
from  the  ancient  Nobles  of  Eliston,  I  cannot  say. 

JVilliam  dc  Ross  seems  to  be  a  south  country  Ross  of  the  House  of  Tarbet. 

Henry  de  Moravia ;  who  he  is  I  know  not. 

WiUielmus  Fraser;  another  branch  of  the  Frasers,  I  can  give  no  account  of. 

Joannes  de  Strivelyn  de  Carse.  This  is  the  ancestor  of  the  Stirlings  of  Alva  and 
Carse,  of  the  same  family  with  the  Stirlings  of  Calder,  as  from  ancient  deeds  I 
have  seen  vouched  in  the  chartularies  of  Cambuskenneth  and  Glasgow".  A  suc- 
cessor of  his,  Sir  John  Stirling  of  the  Carse,  was  a  mighty  great  compiler  with  the 
English,  in  favour  of  Edward  Baliol,  and  is  the  same  John  Stirling  whom  Sir 
Willliam  Dugdale  mentions  was  a  peer  of  England,  and  called  by  a  writ  of  sum- 
mons to  the  Parliament  there.     He  left  a  daughter,  the  heir  of  his  estate  in  Scot- 


ON  THE  RAGMAN-ROLL. 


S^ 


iand,  who  manied  John,  son  of  Sir  Walter  Monteith,  the  ancestor  of  the  once 
great  iaiiiily  of  the  Monteitbs  of  Carse.  Sir  William  Monteith  of  Carse  sold  his 
estate  in  the  163 1  to  Sir  William  Li^ingston  of  Kilsyth,  and  lie  again  in  1638  to 
Sir  Thomas  Hope. 

Gilchrist  More  is  the  ancestor  of  the  Mores  of  Polkellie,  who,  I  think,  is  the 
stem  of  the  Mores,  and  an  ancienicr  family  than  Rowallan,  and  came  to  Sir  Adam 
Muir  of  Rowallan,  by  marriage  of  Janet  More  the  hen-ess,  in  the  days  of  King 
Davtd  n. 

Hii^o  de  Kelso,  the  ancestor  of  the  Kelsos  of  Kelsoland,  not  long  ago  extinct. 

Fergus  Fostersoii,  I  conjecture,  were  the  old  Forresters  of  Skelmorly,  of  whom 
few  are  now  remaining. 

William  Ker.  This,  without  so  much  as  a  question,  is  the  ancestor  of  the  an- 
cient family  of  the  Kers  of  Kersland.  This  is  vouched  from  the  lands  'iS  te?ievien- 
titm  IVillielmi  de  Kers  in  Dairy,  which  are  erected  into  a  free  barony  by  King 
Robert  L  in  favour  oi  Fergusius  de  Ardrossan,  one  of  the  ancestors  of  the  House 
of  Eglinton,  to  whom  they  were  vassals  till  of  late.  The  family  was  in  good  re- 
putation, and  allied  with  the  best  and  the  greatest  families  in  the  west.  The  male 
line  of  the  House  of  Kersland  failed  in  Robert  Ker  of  Kersland,  in  King  James  VL's 
time  His  heir-female  was  married  to  the  renowned  and  valiant  Captain  Thomas 
Crawfurd  of  Jordanhill,  son  to  the  Laird  of  Kilbirny,  whose  eldest  son,  Daniel 
Ker,  assumed  the  surname  of  his  mother's  family,  and  got  the  estate  of  Kersland; 
whjse  great-grandson,  another  Daniel  Ker  of  Kersland,  died  without  issue,  being 
sii  in  at  the  battle  of  Steenkirk  anno  1694.  Crawfurd  of  jordanhiU  is  heir-male 
and  of  provision. 

Robert  de  Ross  I  take  to  be  a  branch  of  the  Rosses  of  Tarbet,  that  were  heritors 
of  the  lands  of  Fairly  in  Cunningham,  from  whence  they  took  their  name. 

Donald  ftz  Gilbert,  who  this  is  1  cannot  say. 

Thomas  de  Gilhagy.  There  were  some  of  the  name,  w^o  were  long  vassals  to  the 
bishops  of  Glasgow,  in  the  barony  of  Glasgow,  and  came  to  have  the  lands  of  Ken- 
nieinll  and  Craigs  in  heritage,  though  they  are  now  out  of  the  estate. 

Patrick  de  Ogilvill,  that  is  Ogilvie,  the  ancestor  of  the  ancient  and  numerous 
family  of  tiie  Ogilvies,  who  are  derived  from  a  younger  branch  of  the  Earls  of 
Angus;  and  having  got  the  lands  of  Ogilvie  in  Angus,  from  whence  they  took 
their  surname.  1  he  chief  and  principal  family  was  Ogilvie  of  that  Ilk,  and  some- 
times designed  of  Powiie,  but  nowe.xtinct.  AH  the  other  great  and  noble  families 
of  the  Ogilvies  are  branched  from  the  House  of  Ogilvie. 

William  de  Gourlay  de  Bagally.  Of  this  surname  are  the  Gourlays  of  Kincraig 
in  Fife,  who  are  reputed  an  ancient  family. 

Robertas  de  Bethune.  This  is  for  certain  the  ancestor  of  the  House  of  Balfoui"; 
of  whom  before. 

David  de  Brichen.  This  is  the  Lord  of  Brechin.  He  was  the  son  of  William  de 
Brichen,  son  of  Henry  de  Brichen,  natural  son  of  David  Earl  of  Huntingdon  in 
England,  and  Earl  of  Garioch  in  Scotland,  brother  to  King  William  the  Lion,  who 
carries  on  his  seals  the  picture  of  a  man  on  horseback,  and,  on  his  arm,  a  shield 
charged  with  three  piles,  issuing  from  the  chief,  and  conjoined  at  the  points  in 
base.  The  same  seal  of  arms  is  used  by  this  Henry  of  Brechin,  his  natural  son, 
to  whom  he  gave  the  barony  of  Brechin,  from  which  he  took  his  surname.  He  is 
witness  to  several  charters  still  extant,  wherein  he  is  called  Henricus  de  Brichen, 
Jilitts  Comitis  David.  William  de  Brichen,  his  son,  is  designed  Willielmus  de  Brichen, 
fttius  Henrici  de  Brichen,  filii  Comitis  David,  (a)  David  de  Brichen  was  his  son, 
who  is  found  here  in  the  Ragman-Roll,  and  was  long  on  the  English  side  during 
the  war :  But  after  the  battle  of  Inverury  he  turned  eminently  to  King  Robert 
the  Bruce,  whose  sister  he  married,  and  ever  afterwards  continued  eminently  loyal. 
David  de  Bticben,  his  son,  was  one  of  the  Barones  Regni  Scotia,  who  in  1320 
V.  rote  that  bold  letter  to  the  Pope,  in  behalf  of  King  Robert  and  the  independency 
of  Scotland;  but  the  year  after,  1321,  he  was  unhappily  made  privy  to  the  con- 
f  piracy  framed  by  the  Countess  of  Strathern  and  the  Lord  Soulis,  against  the  king 

(fl)  Foundation  by  him  of  the  Maison  Dieu  Hospital  at  Brechin,  confirmed  by  King  James  IIL  anno 

1477,  when  the  original  is  transumed. 


y_  HISTORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 

his  uncle;  for  not  discovering  of  which  he  was  tried  at  the  Black  Parliament,  and 
suffered  death  for  the  same,  to  the  universal  regret  of  the  people,  being,  says  the 
gieat  Mr  Buchanan,  "  Omnium  aetatis  sui  ju\enum  &-  belli  &-  pacis  artibus  longe 
«'  primus."  The  haill  lands  he  possessed  at  his  forfeiture,  the  great  barony  of 
Brechin,  the  barony  of  Rothiemay,  the  lands  of  Kinloch,  and  part  of  Glenesk, 
were  all  given  by  K.ing  Robert  to  Sir  David  Barclay  of  Cairny-Barclay  in  Fife, 
of  whom  the  Earls  of  Panmure  were  the  lineal  heirs,  who  place  the  arms  of  Brechin 
and  Barclay  in  the  third  quarter  of  their  shield. 

H'illiam  de  Boseuik,  i.e.  Boswell,  a  very  ancient  surname;  and  though  their 
original  estate  seems  to  have  been  in  the  south,  where  they  are  first  to  be  met 
with,  yet,  in  process  of  time,  they  grew  up  to  be  one  of  the  powerfullest  families 
in  Fife;  they  got  a  part  of  Lochoreshire  by  marriage  of  an  heiress,  and  also  got 
Balmuto,  &-c.  by  one  of  the  heiresses  of  VVemyss.  The  Boswells  of  Balmuto,  as 
they  were  one  of  the  most  opulent  families  in  Fife,  so  they  made  the  best  and  most 
honourable  alliances  of  any  in  all  that  shire:  The  family  of  Auchenleck  in  Kyle, 
in  Ayrshire,  branched  from  Balmuto  in  King  James  IV.'s  time;  and  a  younger 
son  of  them  possesses  the  estate  of  Balmuto,  though  the  right  heirs  of  the  family 
be  still  existing,  though  stript  of  much  of  the  lustre  ot  their  ancestors  ot  the  House 
of  Balmuto. 

Thomas  del  Cbaiteris  del  Conte  de  Roxburgh  is  one  of  the  ancestors  of  the  House 
of  Amisfield,  of  whom  we  have  touched  a  httle  at  already. 

Adam  le  Hoip.  This  gives  a  fair  antiquity  to  the  surname  of  Hope,  of  whom, 
beside  the  Earl  of  Hopeton,  there  are  several  other  gentlemen,  beside  two  in  the 
quality  of  the  baronetage,  Sir  John  Hope-Bruce  of  Craighall,  and  Sir  Alexander 
Hope  of  Carse. 

Johan.  le  fitz  Jobati.  de  Ainsley.  This  was  the  family  of  Ainslie  of  Dolphing- 
ston  in  the  south,  of  whom  there  is  mention  in  records  since  the  Jameses'  time ; 
it  came  to  an  heiress  in  Jjmes  IV.'s  time,  who  married  Sir  Andrew  Ker,  a  brother 
of  the  House  of  CessforcT,  the  ancestor  of  Ker  of  Littledean,  who  carries  Ker  and 
Ainslie  in  his  shield  of  arms. 

Aybner  de  Rutherford,  one  of  the  progenitors  of  the  Rutherfords  of  that  Ilk  in 
the  south,  of  whom  already. 

John  le  Setiescall  de  Jedwith;  if  this  be  not  Sir  John  Stewart  of  Bonkill,  as  is 
generally  agreed  by  our  antiquaries,  it  must  be  a  very  ancient  branch  ot  the 
Stewarts:  But  I  conjecture  it  is  Sir  John  of  Bonkill,  the  same  cAled.  J'rater  ger- 
manus  Jacobi  Senescalli  Scotia,  swearing  submission  to  the  English  for  different 
lands  he  held  in  different  counties.  There  is  in  the  1323  a  John  Setwscal  de  Jed- 
with, bailie  to  the  abbot  of  Kelso,  whom  we  reckon  was  Sir  John's  youngest  son, 
and  one  of  the  Earl  of  Galloway's  progenitors. 

Roger  Corbet.  This  is  apparently  the  Corbets  of  Makerston,  that  plainly  are  come 
of  the  Dunbars,  the  Earls  of  Dunbar,  which  came  to  the  Erasers  by  marriage.  In 
the  reign  of  King  Robert  I.  we  find  mention  in  the  chartulary  of  Melrose,  of  Dc- 
nunus  Laurentius  Fraser,  Dominus  de  DrurnelyJer,  who  had  also  Makerston.  The 
barony  of  Makerston,  in  the  time  of  King  David  II.  came  to  the  heiress,  Margaret 
Fraser,  who  married  Dougal  M'Dougall,  as  he  is  called,  whose  son,  Fergus 
M'Dougall,  had  a  charter  of  the  barony  of  Makerston,  on  the  resignation  of  his 
mother  in  the  records.  There  was  of  the  same  stem  another  family  of  the  Corbets, 
designed  of  Hardgray,  in  Annandale,  though  several  centuries  past  they  have  re- 
sided in  Clydesdale,  in  the  regality  of  Glasgow.  I  have  seen  an  original  charter  in 
the  possession  of  the  Duke  of  Douglas,  by  Thomas  de  Corbet,  Dominus  de  Hardgray 
Jonmii  de  Corbet,  filio  suo,  of  the  lands  of  Limekills,  in  Annandale,  in  1405,  con- 
firmed by  the  Earl  of  Douglas.  They  failed  lately  in  the  person  of  Mr  Hugh  Cor- 
bet of  Hardgray,  who  left  some  daughters,  co-heiresses  of  his  estate;  Barbara, 
married  to  John  Douglas  of  Mams,  and  again  to  Sir  Mungo  Stirling  of  Glorat,  and 
the  other  to  James  Douglas  of  Mains. 

Thomas  le  Johnston :  This  is  the  ancestor  of  the  Johnston  family  ;  some  of  our 

antiquaries  are  of  opinion  that  they  are  come  of  the  same  tribe  with  the  famous 

Thomas  Ranulphi  Camerarius  Scotia,  in   the  reign  of  Alexander  III.  in  1273,  who 

was  father  to  Thomas  Earl  of  Murray,  Dominus  VaiUs  Annandie  et  Mannie  :  I  have 

2 


UN  THE  RAGMAN-ROLL.  J3 

not  seen  the  surname  before  this  time  :  They  turned  out  to  be  a  very  great  family 
on  the  border,  and  were  a  race  of  brave  and  warhke  men,  and  of  great  power  and 
authority.  Another  of  their  ancestors,  Gilhotus  de  Johnston,  had  a  charter  of 
several  lands  in  the  reign  of  King  Robert  the  Bruce.  Another  Sir  John  Johnston 
is  mentioned  in  the  Fcedera  Anglia,  in  the  time  of  King  Robert  IlL  and  made  a 
great  figure  in  the  transactions  on  the  border.  Adam  Johnston  is  the  fust  of  the 
family  in  King  James  L  and  IL's  time  that  1  have  found  designed  de  eodem,  or  of 
that  Ilk.  John  Johnston  of  that  Ilk  was  a  conservator  of  the  peace  with  England 
in  1457  '  ^""^^  Adam  Johnston  of  that  Ilk  in  King  James  IV. 's  reign.  He  died 
in  1501.     His  successors  are  to  be  seen  in  the  Peerage. 

Thomas  de  Cockburn ;  the  ancestor  of  the  Cockburns,  who  were  very  ancient 
vassals  to  the  Earl  of  March  ;  Cockburn  of  Langton  was  the  principal  family  of 
the  name;  Alexander  Cockburn,  ^a^^r,  as  he  is  designed,  got  the  estates  of  Lang- 
ton,  and  Cariden  in  West-Lothian,  by  the  heir-female  of  the  great  family  of  the 
Weaponts,  whose  arras  they  carry ;  he  had  Alexander  Cockburn  of  Langton,  the 
lieir  of  his  family,  and  John  his  son,  ex  prima  uxore,  who  married  Jean,  daughter 
and  heir  of  John  Lindsay  of  Ormiston,  of  whom  came  the  Cockburns  of  Ormiston  ; 
Alexander  Cockburn  of  Langton,  the  father,  had  to  his  second  wife  Margaret, 
daughter  and  heir  of  Sir  John  Monfode  of  iJraidwood  in  Lanarkshire,  by  whom 
he  had  Edw  ard,  a  son,  the  ancestor  of  the  Cockburns  of  Skirhng,  a  family  of  good 
account,  of  a  fair  estate,  though  it  is  now  extinct ;  Alexander  Cockburn  of  Lang- 
ton, the  younger,  called 7?//i/j,  was  Keeper  of  the  Great  Seal  under  King  Robert 
IL  and  ilL  by  whom  he  was  made  Usher  to  the  Parliament,  Ostiarius  Parliamenti; 
which  office  the  family  still  exercises. 

Henry  de  Foderinghay,  i.  e.  Fotheringham,  who  no  doubt  is  the  family  of 
Powrie.  The  name  is  as  ancient  as  the  reign  of  King  William.  I  have  seen  a 
charter  in  the  hands  of  the  Marquis  of  Tweeddale  to  the  Giffords  of  Yester,  to 
which  David  de  Foderinghny  is  a  witness,  and  his  seal  is  appended  to  the  deed  ; 
ermine,  three  bars,  the  same  arms  that  Powrie  still  wears.  I  have  seen  another 
charter  under  the  Great  Seal,  "  Thomae  Foderinghame  filio  Henrici  de  Fodering- 
"■  hame  de  terris  de  Baluny  infra  vicecomet.  de  Forfar,"  upon  Henry  the  father's 
resj.^iiation,  dated  at  Dunkeld  the  i6th  of  October,  anno  regni  nostri  septimo, 
1378,  the  seventh  year  of  the  reign  of  Robert  IL  In  the  subsequent  reign  of  Ro- 
bert lIL  John  B'otheringham  acquired  the  lands  of  Wester-Powrie,  which  belonged 
to  Malcolm  de  Pourie,  to  be  held  of  John  Ogilvie  of  that  Ilk,  baron  of  Easter-Pow- 
rie.  There  is  a  progress  I  have  seen  of  the  House  of  Powrie  down  to  the  pre- 
sent time,  well  Vouched  with  their  intermarriages  and  alliances. 

irdliam  de  Murriff  de  Tillibardin.  The  ancestor  of  his  Grace  the  Duke  of 
Athol,  of  whom  before. 

Reyna/d  de  Craivford  del  Cont  de  Air.  This  may  be  either  Sir  Ronald  Craw- 
furd  of  Loudon,  of  whom  vie.  have  spoke  before,  or  his  uncle  Reginald  Crawfurd. 
who  got  the  lands  of  Kerse  from  his  nephew,  of  whom  came  the  Crawfurds  of 
the  House  of  Kerse,  and  the  cadets  of  that  ancient  family. 

Malcolm  de  Ergadia  Frere,  Sir  Alexander  de  Ergadia.  This  is  a  brother  of  the 
great  House  of  Lorn,  and  may  be  the  Bishop  of  Argyle,  who  is  designed  Martin  de 
Ergytbil  Ergadiensis  Electus,  recommended  to  the  Court  of  Rome  by  the  King  of 
England  to  be  institute  in  the  See.     This  is  but  a  conjecture. 

Duncan  Cambel  del  Isles:  I  cannot  positively  say  who  this  gentleman  is;  he  is 
not  any  of  the  heads  of  the  Lochow  family  ;  for  that  is  not  the  name  of  them,  but 
Colin  and  Neil ;  it  may  be  the  father  of  Sir  Donald  Campbell  of  Redcastle ;  I 
have  seen  the  original  charter  granted  by  Djvenaldi/s  Cumbel  Duncano  Cambel, 
militi,  filio  sua  de  terris  Rubri  Castri  in  Angus,  to  which  Dmiinus  IVdlielmus  de  Keith 
and  Dominits  Willielmus  Lindsay,  Rector  de  Air,  are  witnesses.  I  take  the  date  to 
be  about  the  1300  or  thereabout.  It  was  he  that  married  the  heiress  of  Loudon. 
Sir  Andrew  Campbell  of  Loudon,  his  son,  alienated  these  lands  to  Sir  Robert 
St-vvart  of  Innermeth,  as  from  a  charter  of  confirmation  in  the  registers. 

John  de  Mmtgomerv,  of  -.vhom  before,  the  ancestor  of  the  Hoiise  of  Eaglesham 
and  Eastwood. 

Vol.  IL  7  Y 


34  HISTORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 

Rejnald  More  de  Craig.  This  is  Rowallan,  of  whom  we  have  taken  notice  be 
fore. 

Marjory  Cumin  Dame  de  Gordon.  This  is  the  lady  of  Sir  Adam  Gordon  of  that 
Ilk  in  the  Merse,  Sir  Adam  the  elder,  or  pater,  as  he  is  designed.  But  of  what 
family  of  tlie  Cumins  she  was,    being  then  so  numerous,  I  cannot  say. 

Duncan  Jitz  le  C'jnte  de  Mar.  This  is  a  younger  son  of  the  House  of  Marr, 
who  I  think  was  the  root  of  this  branch  of  the  family,  who  had  the  lands  of  Cas- 
kieben,  which  came  to  the  Johnstons  of  Caskieben  by  marriage.  The  family  kept 
that  estate  till  within  these  fifty  years  or  thereby. 

Ayhner  de  Haudeii.  There  were  at  this  time  two  families  of  the  Haldanes, 
Haldane  of  that  Ilk,  and  Haldane  of  Gleneagles,  who  were  even  then  considerable 
barons,  and  swore  fealty  for  lands  they  held  in  Perthshire.  He  was  grandfather 
by  the  line  of  the  family  to  Sir  Bernard  Haldane  of  Gleneagles.  The  House  of 
Gleneagles  have  vouchers  for  instructing  their  antiquity  beyond  most  other  fami- 
lies in  Perthshire. 

Thomas  de  Boys.  This  is  a  surname  that  was  peculiar  to  a  family  in  Angus, 
designed  of  Panbride,  of  which  the  learned  Hector  Boethius  or  Boece,  that  wrote 
the  History  of  Scotland,  was  a  son. 

Bernard  Fresar  :  That  is  the  same  with  Fraser,  may  be  a  son  of  Sir  Bernard 
Fraser,  who  is  the  head  of  the  family  in  the  reign  of  Alexander  III. 

IVilUam  Fraser  is  another  Fraser ;  but  who  he  is  precisely  I  cannot  say. 

Nicol  de  Preston  is  the  ancestor  of  the  ancient  family  of  the  Prestons,  designed 
of  that  Ilk  and  of  Craigmillar.  They  were  very  ancient  proprietors  of  the  barony 
of  Preston,  and  got  Craigmillar  by  the  purchase  of  Nicol  Preston  from  John  de 
Capella  in  1374  («).  They  continued  a  great  family  till  the  time  of  the  Restoration 
of  King:  Charles  II.  that  Sir  George  Preston  of  Craigmillar  sold  the  estate  to  Sir 
John  Gilmour. 

Wtlliam  de  Sydserf,  who  must  be  the  ancestor  of  the'  Sydserfs  of  that  Ilk,  in 
the  east  country,  whose  successors  I  think  have  lately  been  designed  Sydserff  of 
Ruchlaw.  Of  them  was  Mr  Thomas  Sydserf,  who  was  Bishop  of  Galloway  at  the 
1638,  was  deprived  of  his  bishoprick,  and  survived  the  restoration  of  episcopacy 
at  the  king's  return,  and  died  Bishop  of  Orkney  in  the  1662. 

James  de  Newton,  may  be  the  Newtons  of  that  Ilk,  a  family  in  the  east  coun- 
try, of  whom  I  have  seen  no  voucher  for  their  antiquities;  though  I  suppose  they 
are  for  all  that  an  ancient  family. 

Walter  de  Wedderburn  :  It  seems  to  sound  like  a  local  surname,  and  taken  from 
lands  so  called,  though  there  is  no  vestige  that  ever  the  barony  of  Wedderburn 
in  Berwickshire  was  theirs.  1  have  seen  a  charter  in  King  James  I.'s  time,  Willi- 
elmo  de  Wedderburn,  of  lands  he  had  of  Robert  Blackadder  of  that  Ilk  ;  they  came 
to  be  considerable  burgesses  of  Dundee.  The  first  charter  I  see  they  have  of  a 
land  estate  is  by  Patrick  Lord  Gray  of  the  lands  of  Hilton  and  Wester-Craigie, 
to  David  Wedderburn  and  to  Elizabeth  Lawson  his  spouse,  confirmed  in  the  1552  ; 
but  they  have,  the  same  David  and  his  aforesaid  wife,  a  former  charter  from 
the  Lord  Gray,  of  the  half  of  the  Mains  of  Huntly,  in  the  1542.  They  came  to 
be  stiled  of  that  Ilk  and  Easter-Powrie,  and  another  family  of  Gosford. 

Eylmer  de  Hauden  :  This  is  the  same  gentleman  who  is  designed  del  Conte  de 
Edinburgh,  and  who  is  the  Baron  of  Gleneagles,  who  had  lands  in  that  county. 

Richard  de  Airtb  :  Airth  of  that  Ilk  in  Stirlingshire,  that  ended  in  heirs-female 
in  King  James  I.'s  time,  married  to  Drumirond  and  Somerville,  &-c. 

yohn  ie  Napier,  who  I  suppose  is  the  ancestor  of  the  Napiers  of  Wright's-houses, 
near  E.dinburgh,  who  were  an  ancient  family  ;  for  the  Napiers  of  Merchiston 
began  but  to  make  the  great  figure  they  did  in  King  James  IPs  time ;  of  them  is 
the  Lord  Napier  descended. 

Thomas  Cambel :  I  cannot  say  who  this  gentleman  is. 

Serle  de  Dundas  is  very  clearly  the  ancestor  of  Dundas  of  Dundas,"who  can  well, 
and  by  authentic  vouchers,  carry  up  their  antiquity  to  the  days  of  King  David  I. 
Tliat  the  first  of  their  family,  Helias  Jilius  Hucbtredi,  got  the  lands  of  Dundas 

(a)  Charter  in  the  Register. 


ON  THE  RAGMAN-ROLL.  35 

from  WahU-Jiis  filius  C)sp  itricii,  pro  servitio  dimidii  militis  ;  from  the  lands  it  is 
very  plain  he  took  his  surname.  They  had  also  the  barony  otT"'ingask  in  Perth- 
shire, very  anciently,  which  they  held  of  the  crown  in  libera  bnronia,  though  they 
held  Dundas  but  of  subjects,  to  whom  the  Seaton  family  succeeded  in  King  Ro- 
bert L's  time.  I  have  seen  a  line  of  succession,  well  vouched,  of  the  family,  till 
James  Dundas  of  that  Ilk,  in  King  James  L's  time,  that  he  had  charters  both  of  his 
barony  of  Fingask  and  his  la  ids  of  Dundas,  from  their  resj>ective  superiors  the 
king  and  the  Lord  Seat  n,  to  him  and  his  wife  Christian  Stewart,  and  to  James, 
tlieir  son,  in  fee  («},  and  who  actually  succeeded  to  the  estate  on  the  demise  of  his 
father,  to  whom  he  is  served  ami  retoured  "■  tanquam  legitimus  &■  propinquior 
"  hasres  quondam  Jacobi  Dundas  de  eodein,  patris  sui"  (A).  Tliis  James  Dundas  of 
that  Ilk,  the  younger,  being  allied  in  marriage  with  the  Lord  Livingston,  who  was 
the  great  minister  in  the  minority  of  King  James  IL  deeply  engaged  him  in  all 
their  politics,  and- that  great  man,  having  taken  some  bold  steps  in  the  administra- 
tion, they  came  afterwards  to  be  quarrelled,  and  the  opposition  being  strong  against 
him,  he  and  his  friends  who  had  stuck  to  him  were  all  forfeited  by  a  Parliamen- 
tary attainder;  and,  among  the  rest  of  his  friends,  the  Laird  of  Dundas  (c),  in  the 
1449,  and  the  lands  of  Dundas  and  Echline  were  given  to  the  Earl  of  Douglas: 
But  soon  after  this  the  Lord  Livingston  and  his  friends  being  mostly  restored,  the 
Laird  of  Dundas  was  restored  to  all  the  crown  could  give  him,  that  was  the  barony 
of  Fingask  in  Perthshire,  of  which  we  find  his  son,  Alexander  Dundas  of  Fingask, 
invested,  and  in  full  possession  of,  anno  1466  (^/J:  And,  to  show  that  he  was  the 
heir  of  James  Dundas  of  that  Ilk,  his  father,  his  seal,  with  the  other  arbitrators,  is 
appended  to  the  deed,  bearing  the  plain,  simple,  original  arms,  the  lion  rampant; 
of  whom  Thomas  Dundas  of  Fingask  is  the  lineal  heir.  We  shall  only  further 
stay  to  observe  here,  that  the  estate  of  Dundas  stood  vested  in  William  i'.arl  of 
Douglas,  and  James  Earl  of  Douglas  his  brother,  till  his  attainder  in  Parliament 
on  the  9th  of  June  1455  (e),  when  the  said  estate  v/as  forfeited  to  the  crown.  It 
was  towards  the  end  of  that  same  year  given  by  the  king  to  Archibald  Dundas  of 
Liston,  a  gentleman  of  the  family,  likely,  of  whom  is  come  the  later  Lairds  of  Dun- 
das; but  it  is  clear  and  evident  as  the  sun  at  noon,  that  the  Dundasses  of  Fingask 
are  the  true  heirs-male  of  the  ancient  Lairds  of  Dundas,  preceding  the  reign  af 
King  James  II.  and  so  are  well  entitled  to  wear  the  principal  arms  of  the  family,, 
as  their  ancestor  wore  them  simple  and  plain  in  the  1466. 

J'jhan.  de  Crawford  is  the  next  in  the  record  to  Serle  de  Dundas.  The  truth  is^ 
the  surname  of  Crawfurd  is  then  so  frequent  that  it  is  hard  to  distinguish  them 
from  one  another,  John  being  a  frequent  name  of  the  House  of  Kerse,  it  is  pro- 
bable this  jr>hannes  de  Crawford  may  well  enough,  in  the  chronology,  be  the  son 
of  Reginald  Crawfurd  of  Kerse,  uncle  to  Sir  Reginald  Crawfurd  of  Loudon,  who 
was  put  to  death  by  the  English  at  Ayr  in  1297.  However  this  is  but  a  con- 
jecture. 

Aleyn  JValles.  This  I  take  to  be  the  second  branch  of  the  family  of  Wallace 
who  were  of  Achencruive,  of  whom  Sir  Duncan  Wallace  of  Achencruive  and  Sun- 
drum,  in  King  Robert  II.'s  time,  who,  having  no  issue,  tailzied  his  estate  to  James 
Sap.dilands,  Allan  Cathcart,  and  Robert  Colquhoun,  and  to  their  heirs. 

R'jbert  Boyt,  i.  e.  Boyd,  a.nA  Dictns  Boyt,  is  to  be  found  in  a  charter  by  Sir  John 
Erskine,  of  the  lands  of  Halkhill,  in  ii62(/).  No  doubt  he  was  the  predecessor 
of  that  noble  patriot  Sir  Robert  Boyd,  who,  for  the  merit  and  valour  of  his  services 
to  King  Robert  I.  got  the  lands  of  Kilmarnock  in  1314,  ov  whom  is  descended  in 
a  lineal  course  of  succession  the  Earl  of  Kilmarnock. 

Maurice  de  Arncaple  is  the  ancestor  of  the  Lairds  of  Ardincaple  in  Dumba'ton- 
shire;  who  were  designed  Ardincaples  of  that  Ilk,  till  King  James  V.'s  time,  that 
Alexander,  then  the  head  of  the  family,  took  a  fancy  and  called  himself  Alexander 
Macaulay.  of  Ardincaple,  from  a  predecessor  of  his  own  of  the  name  of  Aulay,  to 
humour  a  patronymical  designation,  as  being  more  agreeable  to  the  head  of  a  clan 
than  the  designation  of  Ardincaple  of  that  Ilk. 

{a)  In  the  Registers.      (V)  Penes  Dundas  de  eodein.      (c)  In  the  Registers,  etiam-  penes  Dundas  ds 
Fir;j;ask.       {d ]  Solemn  Arbitration  betwixt  the  abbots  of  Cupar  aiiQ  ArbioEih,  penes  Dundas  de  Fin. 
gasli.      (f)  Black  Acts  of  Parliament.      (/}   Penes  C.  Glasgow. 
1 


36  HISTORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 

Johannes  de  Johnston,  one  of  the  ancestors  of  the  House  of  Annandale,  of  whom 
before. 

Arthur  de  Galbrait.  This  was  once  a  considerable  family  in  the  Lennox.  The 
iurname  signifies,  in  the  Irish  language,  as  I  am  told  by  those  who  are  most  con- 
versant in  that  language,  the  brave  stranger.  The  first  I  have  seen  is  Gillespick 
Galbrait,  who  is  witness  in  a  charter  by  Malduin  Earl  of  Lennox,  to  Humphrey 
Kirkpatrick,  of  the  lands  of  Colquhoun.  The  same  Earl  Malduin  gives  a  charter 
to  Maurice,  son  of  this  Gillespick,  of  the  lands  of  Baldernock,  KiUearn,  &c.  They 
came  to  be  designed  Domini  de  Gartconnel.  IVillielmus  de  Galbraith,  Dominus  de 
Gartconnel,  in  the  reign  of  King  Robert  III.  had  three  d  mgTiters,  one  married  to 
John  Hamilton,  a  son  of  the  House  of  Cadyow,  the  predecessor  of  the  Hamiltons 
of  Badernoch  and  Bardowie,  another  to  Nicol  Douglas,  a  cadet  of  the  Douglasses 
of  Dalkeith,  as  is  said,  of  whom  the  Douglasses  of  Mains,  Barloch,  and  Keyston,  in 
Dumbartonshire,  and  the  third  to  a  brother  of  the  Logans  of  Restalrig,  of  whom 
came  the  Logans  of  Gartconnel  and  Balvie,  now  extinct. 

Walter  Spreid;  he  is,  in  other  deeds,  designed  Si'iiescallus  Comitis  de  Lennox.  They 
came  to  be  proprietors  of  the  lands  of  Dalquhern  and  Covvden,  in  Renfrewsliire, 
and  subsisted  till  King  James  VI. 's  time.  The  Spreuls  of  Blachern  and  Milton 
iay  they  are  of  them,  and  Blachern  wears  the  principal  arms. 

Grejorie  Sinclair.  This  is  generally  said  to  be  the  progenitor  of  the  Sinclairs  of 
Longformacus  in  the  south,  originally  a  brother  of  the  Sinclairs  of  Roslin.  This 
is  supported  by  a  charter  which  1  have  seen  by  Henricus  de  Srincto  Claro  conies  Or- 
cadice  W  dominus  de  Ros/yn,  wherein  he  firmly  and  faithfully  obliges  himself  to  infeft 
his  well-beloved  cousin  carissimo  consanguineo  suo,  J  icobo  de  Sancto  Claro,  Domino  de 
Longformacus,  in  a  twenty-merk  land.  The  obligation  is  dated  at  Roslin  the  2 2d 
of  June  1384.  Another  James  Sinclair,  son  of  the  former  James  Sinclair  of  Long- 
formacus, gets  from  Henry  Earl  of  Orkney  Dominus  de  Sancto  Claro  y  de  I'allis  de 
Nyth,  an  annuity  of  twenty  merks.  to  be  uphfted  out  of  the  lands  of  Lenny,  dated 
the  20th  February  141 8  («).  From  David  Sinclair,  sou  of  this  James  Sinclair  of 
Longformacus,  is  the  family  come,  as  from  a  lineal  succession  of  them  I  have  seen : 
The  family  is  now  in  the  quality  of  baronets,  as  is  Sir  Robert  Sinclair  of  Stevenston 
who  is  come  of  them. 

Walter  de  Congleton  is  doubtless  the  ancestor  of  the  Congaltons  of  that  Ilk  in 
East-Lothian.  I  have  seen  the  name  in  a  charter  by  Patrick  Earl  of  March,  of  the 
lands  of  Stanypath,  in  the  1316. 

Henricus  Ker.  This  being  a  south  country  gentleman,  I  take  him  to  be  the 
root  of  the  Kers  of  Samuelston,  who  appear  by  that  title  as  soon  as  the  1402. 
George  Ker  of  Samuelston  died  without  heirs-male  in  King  James  IV. 's  time,  and 
left  one  daughter.  Dame  Nicolas  Ker,  who  carried  the  estate  of  Samuelston  to  her 
husband  Alexander  Lord  Home.  By  the  heir  of  line  of  the  family  these  lands 
came  by  marriage  to  John  Hamilton  of  Samuelston,  natural  son  to  the  Earl  ot 
Arran. 

Walterus  de  Berkeleya  I  conjecture  to  be  one  of  the  ancestors  of  the  south 
country  Barclays,  who  are  barons  of  the  half  of  the  barony  of  Ciawfordjohn  in 
Lanarkshire,  which  they  had  obtained  by  the  marriage  of  one  of  the  two  heirs-female 
of  Johannes,  Jilius  Reginaldi  de  Crawford,  in  the  reign  of  King  Alexander  III. 
After  this  we  find  David  Barclay,  7niles,  dominus  dimidiae  baroniae  de  Crawford- 
J/bn,  in  the  reign  of  King  David  II.  anno  1357  :  Sir  Hugh,  his  son,  had  also  the 
barony  of  Kilbirny  in  1397,  and  is  so  called,  and  dominus  dimidiae  baronice  de 
Crawford-John.  His  grandson,  John  Barclay  de  Crawford- J jhn,  as  he  is  designed 
in  1456,  and  de  Kilbirney  in  1471,  had  only  one  daughter,  Marjory,  his  sole  heir, 
who  married  Malcolm  Crawfurd  of  Greenock,  the  ancestor  of  the  present  George 
Crawfurd  Viscount  of  Garnock,  who,  through  the  Barclays  of  Crawfordjohn  is  heir 
of  line  of  the  Crawfurds  of  Cravs'fordjohn.  The  House  of  Kilbirny  kept  the  ba- 
rony of  Crawfordjohn  till  the  1529,  that  Laurence  Crawfurd  of  Kilbirny  exchanged 
these  lands  for  the  estate  of  Drumry  in  Dumbartonshire,  with  Sir  James  Hamilton 
of  Finnart,  and  Dame  Margaret  Livingston  his  wife,  who  was  the  heiress  both  of 
Drumry  and  of  Easter-Wemyss. 

(a)  Charters  I  have  seen- 


ON  THE  RAGMAN-ROLL.  3  7 

Henry  de  Laudere,  i.  e.  Lauder.  After  this  we  find  Robertas  de  Lnwder  pater, 
and  Roberttts  de  Lawder  Jilius,  who  was  Justiciary  under  King  David  IL  As  his 
heir  and  successor  Sir  Robert  Lawder  de  Edrington,  Dominus  de  le  Bass,  was  Jus- 
ticiarius  Laudoniae  in  the  reign  of  King  James  L  Lauder  of  Hatton  appears  to  be 
come  of  them  in  the  days  of  Robert  IL 

Robert  de  Fmsyde  seems  to  be  of  the  Fawsides  of  that  Ilk,  near  Dalkeitli,  \vho 
were  great  men  about  the  Stewarts  after  they  came  to  the  crown ;  they  sold  the 
estate  m  King  James  VL's  time. 

Johan.  de  kl}ttlawe,  i.  e.  I  think  Whitelaw,  the  Whitelaws  of  that  Ilk,  near 
Dunbar,  who  were  long  a  family  of  credit  and  reputation.  The  eldest  daughter 
and  co-heir  of  Patrick  Whitelaw  of  that  Ilk  married  Sir  Alexander  Hamilton  of 
Innerwick  in  King  James  Vl.'s  days.  Some  male  branch  of  them,  it  would  appear, 
recovered  the  estate  of  Whitelaw,  and  designed  themselves  of  that  Ilk;  it  came 
lately,  in  our  own  time,  to  a  second  heiress,  who  married  a  gentleman  hom  the 
^^•est,  of  the  name  of  Burnside.  of  the  Buruiides  of  Gavinburn,  near  Kilpatrick, 
who  retains  his  own  name. 

Gilbert  de  Drummond.  This  is  the  ancestor  of  the  Drummond  family,  while 
they  .were  possessors  of  the  lands  of  Drymen,  or  Drummon,  in  Lennox,  of  whom 
the  Earls  of  Perth ;  for  which  see  the  Peerage,  where  an  account  of  their  antiquity, 
alliances,  oflkes,  &-c.  are  fully  described. 

Piers  de  Cockbiirn.  This  seems  to  be  the  root  of  the  Cockburns  of  Langton, 
Ormiston,  and  Clerkington,  of  whom  the  rest  of  the  Cockburns  are  come.^ 

Norman  de  Lescelyne,  Chevalier.  This  is  the  Leslie  of  Rothes  family,  whose 
name  at  that  time  is  Norman;  of  whom  already. 

Roger  de  Crawford  del  Lonte  de  Mir.  This  is  for  certain  the  family  of  the  Craw- 
furds  that  were  sometimes  designed  of  Cumnock,  and  sometimes  of  Tarringin  ; 
and  had  also  the  the  lands  of  Crawfordston  in  Nithsdale.  The  direct  male  branch 
of  them  ended  in  King  James  XL's  time,  and  Crawfordston  came  to  Sir  Robert 
Criciiton  of  Sanquhar,  some  apprehend,  by  marriage  ot  the  heiress:  But  I  see  no 
voucher,  unless  it  be  the  tradition,  that  is  not  much  to  be  depended  on,  nor  ought 
to  be  carried  far  where  there  is  any  plenty  of  better  vouchers:  So  much  however 
is  certain,  that  Roger  Crawfurd  of  Boughs,  Daleagles,  &c.  was,  in  the  reign  of  Ro- 
bert II.  anno  1387,  brother  to  Edward  Crawfurd  of  Tarringin;  and  that  he  found- 
ed the  once  great  House  of  the  Crawfurds  of  Drongan,  of  whom  came  another 
considerable  family  of  the  Crawfurds  of  Liffnorris.  I  have  seen  Sir  George  Craw- 
furd ot  Liffnorris,  in  the  1630,  served  heir  to  his  predecessor's  brother,  Edw'ard 
Crawfurd  of  Tarringin.     Of  them  all  the  Crawfurds  in  Kyle  are  come. 

Robert  de  Graunt  must  be  the  ancestor  of  the  family  of  Grant.  They  say  them- 
selves, that  a  little  after  this  their  family  came  to  an  heiress,  who  married  a  gen- 
tleman of  the  name  of  Stewart,  who  assumed  the  surname  of  Grant,  of  whom  they 
are  descended,  and  is  designed  del  Conte  de  Fife. 

Henry  le  fitz  Annand.  Henry  de  jinnandia  seems  to  be  his  son,  who  gets  a  char- 
ter from  King  Robert  I.  of  the  lands  of  Sauchie,  in  the  shire  of  Clackmanan,  by 
his  charter  I  have  seen,  dated  at  Peebles  decimo  die  junii,  the  i8th  year  of  his  reign, 
i.e.  1324.  The  family,  in  King  James  I.'s  time,  came  to  two  heirs-female;  Mary, 
who  was  married  to  James  Shaw  of  Greenock,  and  Margaret,  to  William  Brown  of 
Coalston;  for  there  is  a  charter  by  King  James  I.  '•  dilecto  &-  fideli  suo  Willielmo 
"  Brown,  de  totis  &•  integris  media  parte  baronias  de  Sauchy,  infra  vicecomitatum 
"  de  Clacmannan,  totis  &-  integris  media  parte  de  Gartquher,  jacen.  infra  vicecomita- 
"  tum  ejusdem,  totis  &-  integris  terris  de  Fynlory,  jacen.  infra  vicecomitatum  de 
"  Kynross,  totis  &-  integris  mediae  partis  terrarum  de  Achindrane,  jacen.  infra 
"  vicecomitatum  de  Air:  Qusequidem  terrae  fuerunt  Margarets  de  Annandia  ha;- 
"  reditarie."  The  lands  so  resigned  are  limited  to  the  heirs  of  her  and  her  hus- 
band ;  which  failing,  "  Joanni  de  Schaw,  filio  &.  hseredi  Jacobi  de  Scliaw,  scuti- 
"  ferl  nostri,  sexto  Aprilis,  anno  regni  nostri  vicesimo  sexto,"  that  is  1431  (<v).  The 
Shaws  after  that  acquired  the  other  half  of  the  barony  of  Sauchie  from  the  Browns, 

(a)  Penes  Sir  John  Shaw  Baronetum  de  Greenock  &  Sauchy, 

Vol.  II.  7  Z 


3b  HISTORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 

and  came  to  be  considerable  barons,  both  for  estate  and  alliances.  Sir  John  Shaw, 
baronet  of  Sauchie  and  Greenock,  represents  the  family. 

Finlay  de  Houston,  Cheviilier.  Tliis  is  the  ancestor  of  the  ancient  family  of 
Houston  in  Renfrewshire,  who  have  family  writs  and  charters  as  tar  up  as  King 
Malcolm  IV. 's  time,  that  the  family  began  in  one  Hugo  de  Padvtnan,  wiio  got  ine 
lands  then  called  Kilpeter,  from  Balduiii  de  B/gris  Vicecu,!u-s  Regis  de  Laneik. 
From  his  grandson,  another  Hugh,  the  lands  were  called  Houston,  and  from  thence 
the  surname.  A  line  of  the  family  is  made  out  from  the  writs  in  the  History  of 
the  Shire  of  Renfrew,  which  may  be  referred  to.  The  family  is  represented  by  Sir 
John  Houston,  baronet. 

William  le  Fleeming,  Chevalier.  This,  to  be  sure,  is  the  ancient  family  of  Fleming 
of  Barochan,  still  extant  in  Renfrewshire,  who,  at  this  time,  in  other  ancient 
vouchers,  is  designed  Willielmus  Flandrensis  de  Baruchan  («);  the  family  still  con- 
tinues. William  I'leming  is  now  of  Barochan :  His  predecessor,  and  the  predeces- 
sor of  the  Flemings  of  Cumbernauld,  were  two  brothers,  and  they  are  in  all  the 
entails  of  the  family  ot  Fleming. 

'John  le  Senescal,  Chevalier.  This  I  take  to  be  Sir  John  Stewart  of  Bonkill,  bro- 
ther to  James  the  Great  Steward  of  Scotland,  of  whom  before. 

IVillielmus  de  Schaw.  This  is  the  ancestor  of  the  Shaws  of  Haylley  and  Sauchie, 
as  1  take  it,  and  is  the  same  gentleman  that  gets  a  charter  from  J  wobus  Senescallus 
Scotia  terrtirum  de  Hadys.  The  charter  is  without  date,  but  the  granter  died  in 
the  1309,  and  might  be  some  time  before  (A). 

Robert  de  la  Cbambre,  I  fancy,  is  the  predecessor  of  Gadgirth,  who  is  a  very  an- 
cient family  in  K\le;  they  are  mentioned  in  the  old  registers  of  Paisley,  and  they 
have  charters  from  K.ing  Robert  the  Bruce,  and  others  from  the  Stewarts  before, 
who  were  Lords  of  Kyle.    Captain  John  Chalmers  is  now  of  Gadgirth. 

Toomas  de  Ralphiston,  1  think,  may  be  the  Ralphstons  of  that  Ilk  in  Renfrewshire, 
a  family  still  remaining.     The  name  is  confined  to  themselves. 

Giles  de  Eastivood.  The  same  name  and  designation  is  to  be  found  under  the 
great  Stewarts;  but  how  the  barony  of  Eastwood  came  from  the  Eastwoods  to  the 
Montgomerys,  by  marriage  or  conquest,  I  cannot  say. 

^lysandre  ^iikman  is,  by  this,  an  ancient  surname.  Mr  Thomas  Aikman  of 
Bromleton  and  Ross  is  doubtless  of  this  Alexander  Aikman. 

Geofry  de  Hume  is  one  of  the  ancestors  of  the  Earls  of  Home,  and  comes  after 
the  VViiliams  ot  the  family.     See  the  Peerage  for  more  of  the  Homes. 

Dougal  Ciimbell ;  who  this  is  1  cannot  say. 

Arthur  Cambell  I  take  to  be  the  Macarthur  Campbells  of  Straquhur;  of  whom  I 
have  seen  a  charter  in  Robert  Il.'s  tirpe.  The  family  is  still  continiing;  of  them 
is  descended  the  Campbells  of  Cessnock  in  Ayrshire,  a  considerable  family. 

David  Blare  is  one  of  the  ancestors  of  the  ancient  family  of  Blair  of  that  Ilk  in 
Ayrshire. 

Duncan  Cambell;  who  this  gentleman  is  I  cannot  say. 

'john  de  Ramsaye,  Adam  de  Rumsaye.  These  two  Ramsays,  I  apprehend,  may 
be  the  Ramsays  of  Auchterhouse,  and  the  Ramsays  of  Cainock,  of  w hom  came 
the  great  barons  of  Dalhousie,  now,  and  since  the  1633,  in  the  quality  of  earls, 

Simon  de  Orrock  is  without  a  question  the  ancestor  of  the  House  of  Orrock  of  that 
Ilk,  in  the  shire  of  Fife,  reputed  an  ancient  family. 

Piers  de  Pitcairn.  The  ancestor  of  the  Pitcairns  of  that  Ilk  in  Fife,  a  family  I 
have  seen  charters  for  as  far  back  as  the  1417.  Of  them  was  Robert  Pitcairn, 
Commendator  of  Dunfermline,  Secretary  during  the  regency  of  Murray,  Lennox, 
Marr,  and  Morton,  a  great  compiler  with  every  thing  that  was  uppermost;  a  great 
time-server,  a  great  enemy  to  Qiieen  Mary,  and  a  very  humble  servant  of  the  Re- 
gent's.    There  it  no  memory  of  him  remaining. 

Robertus  de  Dimdas;  who  this  is,  if  not  Dundas  of  that  Ilk,  I  cannot  say.  • 

Duncan  Macgikhrist  de  Levenax.  This  is  the  predecessor  of  the  Laird  of  Mac- 
failane  of  the  Arrochar,  or  Macfarlane  of  that  Ilk.     The  first  of  his  ancestors  was 

[a)  Origins!  cViartcrs  still  extant,  mentioned  in  tlie  History  of  the  Shire  of  Renfrew.  (i)  Original 
charter  in  ihe  hands  of  Alexander  Shaw,  writer  in  Edinburgh. 


ON  THE  RAG^L\N-ROLL. 


39 


Gilchrist,  younger  son  of  Alwin,  second  of  that  name,  Earl  of  Lennox.  Tliis  is 
vouched  from  a  charter  granted  by  Maldain  Earl  of  Lennox,  "  Gilchrist  fratri  siio, 
"  de  terris  de  superiori  Arrochar  de  Luss,  una  cum  insulis  Elanvow,  Elanvanow, 
"  Elanrouglass  St  Elaig;"  which  lands,  together  with  those  islands  in  Lochlomond, 
are  in  the  possession  of  the  L-iird  of  Macfarlane  to  this  day.  1  have  seen  a  charter 
granted  by  this  same  ALdduin  Earl  of  Lennox,  Aiiselm  JiHus  ALicbd,  ancestor  to 
the  Buchanans  of  that  Ilk,  de  insula  dc  Clarins  in  Lochlomond,  in  1225,  to  winch 
Gilchrist,  the  earl's  brother,  is  a  witness (,-/).  This  Gilchrist  de  Arrocljui's  suc- 
cessor, son  and  heir  to  the  former,  was  Duncan,  who  is  designed  Duncanus  JUius 
Gilchrist,  or  Macgilchrist,  mentioned  in  the  record.  He  got  a  confirmation  char- 
ter from  his  cousin  Malcolm  Earl  of  Lennox:  By  the  charter  he  ratifies  the  grant, 
"  quas  Mdduinus  avus  meub  tecit  Gilchrist  fratri  suo  de  terris  de  superiori  Arro- 
"  char  de  Luss.".  The  charter  is  m  the  reign  of  K.ing  Alexander  111.  These  two 
charters  are  afterwards  ratified  by  K-ing  James  I.  by  a  charter  under  the  Great 
.Seal  in  the  public  register.  Malduin,  his  son,  was  the  next  of  thi  line  of  this  an- 
cient family,  and  father  to  Bartholomew,  or  Parlane,  which,  1  have  a  good  au- 
thority for,  in  the  Irish  language,  is  one  and  the  same.  From  this  Parlane  his 
posterity  came  to  take  the  patronymic  of  Macpharlane,  or  Macfarlane.  Malcolm, 
his  son,  is  designed  MalcAmus  Macfarlane,  who  gets  a  charter  from  Donald  Earl 
of  Lennox,  of  his  estate,  on  the  resignation  of  his  father  Burtholemew,  films  Mcil- 
ditini:  So,  from  these  authorities,  the  line  of  the  family  of  Macfarlane  is  au- 
thentically run  up  to  the  Earl  of  Lennox's  son,  Gilchrist,  their  ancestor,  which  is 
a  very  ilkistrious  descent,  and  a  very  higii  antiquity,  from  this  Malcolm  Mac- 
farlane of  Arrochar  the  family  have  a  well  vouciied  pedigree,  with  their  alliances, 
intermarriages,  and  their  numerous  cadets  and  descendants,  as  any  I  have  seen,  to 
Walter  Macfarlane  of  that  Ilk,  now  the  head  of  the  family. 

Macoirn  de  Buqubunnan  :   that  is,  as  1  take  it,   Buchanan,  the   root  of  that  an-  j 

cient  family.  Gilbert,  his  father,  was  Senescallus  dmitis  de  Levenox,  and  the  first 
who  got  the  carrucatam  terra  de  Buchanan,  and  from  it  took   his  na  ne.     They  1 

turned  out  to  be  a  very  considerable  family,  designed  Buclianans  of  that  Ilk. 
and  had  once  in  a  day  a  considerable  estate.     They  were  nuaierous  in  their  cadets,  . 

though  they  are  not  reckoned  among  the  clans.      The   principal  family  failed  in  I 

the  last  century,  and  the  estate  is  in  the  possession  of  the  Duke  of  Mjntrose,   who  ! 

has  their  writs  and  the  charter-chest  I  have  seen.  Tiie  latest  cadet  of  the  House 
Oi'  Buchanan  is  Buchanan  of  Achmar  ;  and,  as  such,  is  reputed  the  cnief  family  of 
the  name,  though  a  great  many  others  have  far  better  estates.  But  chiefship  goes 
by  blood,  not  by  wealth  and  riches,  whicn  is  indeed  neces:,ary  to  support  the  lustre 
of  a  family. 

Thomas  de  Montgomery  :  Some  think  this  is  one  of  the  heads  of  the  Eagleshara 
family  ;  I  can  say  little  for  or  against  it  :  but  they  have  far  back  a  Tiiomas  among 
them,  and  likely  this  is  he. 

Gilbert  de  Hanyethe,  i.  e.  Hannay  :  There  was  a  family  of  the  name  in  Gallo- 
way, Hannay  of  Sorbie,  extinct. 

Thomas  de  Kellyhill :  Who  this  is,  or  who  have  proceeded  from  him,  is  what  I 
cannot  say. 

J)an.  de  Craigy  is,  without  a  question,  the  ancient  family  of  Craigie  of  that  Ilk, 
or  Craigiehall  in  Linlithgowshire :  They  were  ancient  proprietors  of  the  estate  of 
Craigie  ;  for  Joannes  de  Cragin,  i.  e.  Craigie,  is  a  witness  to  Dandas's  first  ch  ater 
in  K.ing  David's  time.  After  this  they  came  to  be  designed  of  that  Ilk.  In  the 
I }^7  'Joannes  de  Crai^y,  D-vninus  ejusdem,  is  m  ide  mention  ot  in  the  chartulary  of 
St  Giles  :  He  got  the  lands  and  barony  of  Braidwood  in  Lanarkshire,  by  the  mar- 
riage of  Margaret,  the  daughter  and  heir  of  Sir  John  de  Monfode  (b),  who  hud  the 
lands  ei-ected  into  a  barony  by  King  Robert  the  Brace  ;  by  whom  he  had  only 
one  daughter,  Margaret,  called  Domina  de  Craigy,  heiress  of  Craigie  and  Braid- 
wood,  who,  in  the  1387,  married  Sir  John  Stewart,  whom  King  Robert  II.  calls 
his  consanjuineus,  a  younger  son  of  Sir  Robert  Stewart  of  Durisdeer,  ancestor  of 

(n)   Pene?  dacem  de  Montrose.      (*)  Writs  of  thejfamily  of  Lee.  ^ 


4'- 


HIITORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 


the  Stewarts  of  Rosy th,  of  whom  came  the  Stewarts  of  Craigiehall,  who  told  their 
estate  in  King  Charles  I.'s  time.  They  quartered  the  coat  of  Crai^ie  with  their 
own  arms  of  the  Stewarts,  Though  they  be  out  of  the  estate  the  family  is  not 
extinct. 

Henry  de  Dahnaboy,  the  ancient  family  of  Dalmahoy,  near  Edinburgh,  are  now 
baronets. 

.-indrew  Eraser:  This  is  the  ancestor  of  the  Erasers  of  Touch-Fraser,  that  came 
to  the  Seatons  by  marriage  ;  of  whom  the  House  of  Touch. 

Gilbert  de  MacLurk  :  That  I  take  to  be  the  name  of  Maclurg,  a  surname  in 
Carrick  among  the  commons. 

J-ihan.  fit%  Neil  de  Carrick.  I  take  this  man  to  be  the  predecessor  of  the 
Neilsons  of  Craigcafie. 

Adam  le  Walys  :  This  is  the  head  of  the  ancient  family  of  Wallace  of  Riccarton 
in  Kyle,  who  1  take  to  be  of  a  Welch  extraction,  and  a  very  great  antiquary  betore 
me  is  of  the  same  opinion,  that  they  are  descended  from  Eimenis  Caltcuis,  witness 
to  King  David's  charter  of  foundation  of  the  abbacy  of  Kelso.  Ruardus  Gwal- 
lensis,  or  I'Vallensis,  is  a  witness  to  charters  in  the  reign  of  King  Alexander  11.  and 
is  then  for  certain  of  Riccarton.  From  this  Ricardus  I'Vallensis  was  Riccarton  or 
Richardston  so  called.  Sir  William  Wallace,  Governor  and  General  of  the  Scots 
forces  in  1298,  the  famous  and  ever  renowned  patriot,  was  his  son.  John  Wal- 
lace of  Riccarton,  in  the  end  of  the  reign  of  King  David  11.  got  the  barony  of 
Craigie  by  the  marriage  of  the  heir-female  of  John  Lindsay  of  Thurston  and 
Craigie.  Of  this  marnage  Sir  Thomas  WaMace  of  Craigie,  baronet,  is  the  lineal 
heir-male,  and  quarters  the  coat  of  Lindsay  with  his  own  name  of  Wallace. 

William  de  Ketbkerk.  That  is  plainly  Cathcart,  the  ancestor  of  the  family  of  the 
Lord  Cathcart,  who  are  very  ancient  in  Renfrewshire,  and  have  been  designed 
domini  ejiudem  and  mi.'ites  since  King  Robert  I.'s  time.  They  were  raised  to  be 
peers  by  King  James  II.  in  1452.  Charles,  now  Lord  Cathcart,  is  his  Imeal 
lieir. 

Nicol  le  Wallets:  This  is  another  branch  of  the  House  of  Riccarton. 

Renaiid,  i.  e.  Reginald  More,  the  Polkelly  Mores,  that  was  the  root-family  of 
the  IMores,  that  in  the  reign  of  King  Robert  I.  came  by  an  heiress  to  the  Mures  of 
Rowallan. 

Roger  de  Crawford  :  This  is  the  Tarringin  Crawfords ;  for  Roger  was  a  fre- 
quent name  among  them  in  the  more  ancient  times. 

Robert  de  Boyvit :  That  is  plainly  Boil  or  Boyle  of  Kelburn,  who  is  then  and 
before  that  a  family  existing  in  the  country  of  Cunningham  and  shire  of  Ayr. 
Richard  Boyle,  or  de  Boyvile,  is  proprietor  of  the  lands  of  Rysholm,  in  tenemento 
de  Dalray,  which,  among  other  lands,  are  erected  "  in  unum  et  integram  liberam 
"  baroniara,"  by  King  Robert  the  Bruce,  Fcrgusio  de  Ardrossan,  as  is  clear  from 
the  charter  in  the  register.  After  him  there  is  a  charter  granted  by  "  Wakerus 
"  Cumine  de  Rowallan,  Ricardo  Boill,  Domino  de  Caulburn,"  as  from  the  charter 
in  Mr  Anderson's  Diplomata  Scotia.  ■  The  charter  is  in  King  David  Bruce's  time. 
The  family  continue  still,  but  ^re  lately  raised  to  the  rank  of  nobility  ;  first,  in  the 
1699,  David  Boyle  of  Kelburn  was  created  Lord  Boyle,  and  then  Earl  of  Glasgow 
in  the  1703. 

William  Butle  :  Who  this  is  I  know  not.     And  then 

Ayhner  de  la  Huntar  is  for  certain  the  Hunters  of  Arneil,  designed  of  Hunters- 
ton,  and  of  that  Ilk.  In  an  ancient  bounding-charter  of  lands,  it  is  bounded  with 
terris  Normani  venatoris,  which  is  plainly  the  lands  of  Arneil-Hunter,  which  is 
the  lands  of  Hunterston.  They  have  a  charter  of  the  lands  of  Arneil-Hunter 
from  King  Robert  II.  and  it  is  in  the  registers  ;  also  I  have  seen  the  writs  of 
the  family  from  this  time  till  Robert  Hunter  of  that  Ilk,  the  present  proprie- 
tor. 

Raiilf  de  Eglinton  is  the  ancient  family  of  the  Eglintons  of  tliat  Ilk,  which  ended 
in  the  daughter  and  heir  of  Hvgo  de  Eglinton,Dominus  ejusdem,  married  to  Sir  John 
Montgomery  of  Eaglesham,  in  King  Robert  II.'s  time. 

Kiel  Jit7.  Robert  de  Dulop:  If  this  be  the  predecessor  of  Dunlop  of  that  Ilk,  and 
if  they  had  the  lands  of  Dunlop,  they  have  gone  from  them  again,  for  they  are  in 


ON  THE  RAGMAN-ROLL.  41 

the  tamily  of  Douglas  after  this,  as  a  part  of  the  barony  of  Stewarton  ;  for  in  the 
marriage  articles  betwixt  John  Earl  of  Buchan,  son  to  the  Duke  of  Albany, 
and  Lady  Eluabeth  Douglas,  daughter  of  Archibald  Earl  of  Douglas,  in  the  1413, 
he  gives  him  the  lands  of  Dunlop,  8tc.  as  from  the  original  1  liave  seen  in  the 
register :  However,  after  this  the  surname  of  Dunlop  got  or  recovered  the  lands  of 
Hunthall  in  Dunlop,  of  which  Constantine  Dunlop  is  proprietor,  and  were  in  non- 
entry  in  14S3,  since  the  decease  of  Alexander  Dunlop  his  guidsue.  This  Con- 
staiirine  Dunlop,  who  is  first  designed  of  Hunthall,  comes  to  be  designed  of  that 
Ilk  in  the  1409  ;  the  succeeding  lairds  of  Dunlop  are  come  of  him,  Erancis  Dun- 
lop is  now  of  that  Ilk. 

Adam  dj  la  More  may  be  the  Rowallan  Mures. 

GiliUQreftz  Edward  is  the  head  of  the  Cunninghams  of  Kilmaurs,  though  then 
designed  patronymically,  and  are  the  ancestors  of  the  Earls  of  Glencairn. 

Ralph  Fenye,  I  take  to  be  Fairly  of  that  Ilk,  a  very  ancient  family  in  Cunning- 
ham, who  were  originally  Rosses ;  and  getting  the  lands  of  Fairly,  he  took  the 
name  from  the  lands.  The  tamily  is  now  extinct ;  for  the  Fairlys  who  now  stile 
themselves  of  that  Ilk,  are  of  the  Fairlys  of  Burntsfield  near  Edinburgh,  a  branch 
of  the  Fairlys  of  Braid,  wiio  were  also  a  very  ancient  family. 

IVilliam  de  Crawford :  1  take  this  to  be  the  branch  of  the  Crawfurds  of  Loudon, 
who  .vere  afterwards  designed  of  Haining  in  Stirlingshire,  which  became  one  of 
the  most  considerable  families  of  the  name  of  Crawfurd.  It  came  to  end  in  an 
heiress  in  the  time  of  Q_iieen  Mary.  She  married  Thomas  Livingston,  son  to  the 
Lord  Livingston,  of  whom  came  the  Crawfurd  Livingstons  of  Haining,  of  them  are 
the  Crawfurds  of  Lochcoat,  and  tlie  other  Crawfurds  in  Linlithgow.  Of  them  was 
also  Nicol  Crawfurd  of  Osgang,  Justice-Clerk  in  King  James  V.'s  time. 

IValter  de  Lynne  is  without  doubt  the  ancestor  of  the  Lynnes  of  that  Ilk,  a  little 
ancient  family  in  Cunningham,  but  lately  extinct. 

Murchaw  de  Montgonwry  is  another  family  of  Montgomery,  distinct  from  Eagles- 
ham  and  Stair,  and  may  be  the  Montgomerys  of  Thornton,  reputed  one  of  the 
ancientest  families  of  the  name.  John  Montgomery  of  Thornton  was  forfeited  in 
King  James  V.'s  time,  and  his  estate  given  to  the  Lord  Home  ;  his  only  daughter 
was  married  to  Sir  Alexander  Hamilton  of  Innerwick  {a). 

Nicol  de  Acbethlec,  i.  e.  Auchinleck  of  that  Ilk,  an  ancient  family  in  Kyle.  A 
successor  of  his,  Johannes  de  Auchinleck,  dotninus  ejusdem,  miles,  gives  to  the  abbot 
and  convent  of  Paisley,  "  pro  contemptu  et  violatione  lis  factis  cuidam  monacho 
"  ipsius  monasterii,  vasa  sua  seminaria  amputando,  per  me  et  complices  iiieos, 
"  viginti  solidos  Sterlingorum,  de  terris  et  proventibus  firmarum  terrarum  mea- 
"  rum,  ad  duos  anni  terminos,"  dated  the  loth  May  1385  (6).  This  mortification 
is  ratified  by  Jibannes  Auchinleck,  dominus  ejusdem,  in  the  1392.  James  Auchin- 
leck of  that  ilk,  his  son,  was  slain  in  a  family  feud,  or  a  petty  war,  by  a  neigh- 
bour of  his  own,  Robert  Colvil  of  Ochiltree,  in  the  1449.  It  was  he  that  got  the 
barony  of  Glenbervie  in  the  Merns,  by  the  marriage  of  the  daughter  and  the  co- 
heir of  Alexander  Melville  of  Glenbervie.  John  Auchinleck  of  that  Ilk,  his  son, 
having  married,  in  his  own  time,  James  Auchinleck,  his  son  and  apparent  heir, 
to  Egidia,  daughter  of  John  Lord  Ross,  by  whom  he  had  only  one  daugliter,  who 
was  heir  of  line  to  her  grandfather.  He  had  a  second  son,  of  whom  llowed  the 
Auchinlecks  of  Balmanno.  In  the  1499,  S'""  Jol'"  Auchinleck  of  that  Ilk  disponed 
his  estate  without  the  king  the  superior's  consent,  to  William  Cunningham  of 
Craigends,  and  Marion  Auchinleck  his  spouse,  daughter  to  the  said  Sir  John; 
whereupon  the  estate  recognosced,  and  the  barony  of  Auchinleck  was  thereupon 
given  by  King  James  IV.  to  his  servant,  as  he  calls  him,  Thomas  Boswell,  son  to 
Sir  Alexander  Boswell  of  Balmuto,  in  the  1505.  The  heir  of  line  of  the  family 
of  Auchinleck  of  that  Ilk,  Dame  Elizabeth  Auchinleck,  got  the  barony  of  Glen- 
bervie, and  married  Sir  William  Douglas,  son  to  the  Earl  of  Angus,  of  whom  is 

(a)  Writs  from  the  register,  and  the  writs  of  Innerwick.  (i)  Chartulary  of  Paisley ;  the  tradition 
is,  the  ge;itleman  got  the  monk  lying  with  his  daughter. 

Vol.  1L  3- A 


4^ 


HISTORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 


come  t!ie  Douglas  family,  and  all  the  other  branches  flowing  from  that   illustrious 
stock  ever  since. 

Malcolm  Lockart  del  Conte  de  Air  is  for  certain  the  ancient  family  of  Lockhart 
of  Barr  in  the  west,  now  extinct. 

John  de  Maccusuel  seems  to  be  one  of  the  ancestors  of  the  House  of  Maxwell, 
while  they  had  their  estate  in  the  west,  in  the  barony  of  the  Merns  in  Renfrew- 
shire. 

Philip  le  Engleys  is  the  Inglises  of  Brankesholm  and  Manor,  and  afterward,  of 
Murdiston  in  Lanarkshire,  a  family  of  good  antiquity,  but  now  extinct ;  for  Alex- 
ander Inglis,  the  present  Murdiston,  is  not  of  this  family,  but  heir  of  line  of  the 
Inglises  of  Inglistarvet  in  Fife,  a  family  as  ancient  as  King  Robert  II.'s  time,  from 
the  writs  of  that  house  I  have  seen. 

Symon  de  la  Chambre,  who  may  be  Gadgirth's  predecessor. 

Robert  Eraser :  I  take  this  Fraser,  being  in  the  west,  to  be  the  ancestor  of  the 
Frasers  of  Knock  in  Ayrshire,  who  had  been  very  ancient  there,  and  lasted  a  fa- 
mily till  King  Charles  II.'s  time. 

Fergus  de  Bard  :  This  may  be  the  Bairds  of  Kipp  and  Evandale,  who  were  a 
great  family  m  Lanarkshire  that  were  very  considerable. 

Henry  de  Swinton  is  the  ancient  family  of  Swinton,  who  are  of  great  antiquity. 
Their  ancester  is  that  Armtlpbus,  miles,  who  gets  a  charter  of  Swinton,  "  faciendo 
"  servitium  monachis  Dunelmensibus,"  and  another  of  the  same  lands,  "  Red- 
"  dendo  xi.  solidos  per  annum,  sine  servitio;"  and  from  the  lands  the  proprietors 
took  the  surname.  Sir  John  Swinton  came  to  be  Dominus  de  Mar  in  right  of 
courtesy,  by  the  marriage  of  Margaret  Countess  Dowager  of  Douglas,  and  in  right 
of  her  own  blood  Countess  of  Marr  in  1389,  as  from  vouchers  in  the  chartulary  of 
Melrose  belonging  to  the  Earl  of  Haddington.  John  Swinton  of  that  Ilk  was  the 
Scotsman  in  all  Scotland  that  complied  most  with  Cromwell,  and  was  by  him 
made  one  of  his  lords  of  the  Other-house:  He  was  forfeited  165 1;  but  from  some 
nullities  in  form  of  process  the  estate  was  restored,  at  the  Revolution,  to  his  son  Sir 
John  Swinton  of  that  Ilk. 

Thomas  de  Crighton,  the  ancestor  of  the  Lord  Crichton's  family,  that  were  for- 
feited in  King  James  Ill.'s  time,  of  whom  the  Viscounts  of  Frendraught  were 
the  lineal  heirs,  and  were  forfeited  since  the  Revolution  for  adhering  to  King 
James  VII. 

Aleyn  de  Elpbingston,  the  ancestor  of  the  Lord  Elphinstoae's  family,  of  whom  al- 
ready. 

Ada  de  Fraser  is  another  Fraser  of  whom  I  can  give  no  account  more  than  that 
she  was  prioress  of  Eccles. 

Adam  de  Lnmisden  is  the  ancestor  of  the  Lumisdens  of  that  Ilk,  who  have  a 
a  charter  from  John  Earl  of  Angus  in  1332,  of  the  lands  of  Blanern  in  the  Merse, 
which  I  have  seen.  Robert  Lumisden  of  Innergelly  in  Fife  is  the  heir  of  the  fa- 
mily. 

Adam  de  Nisbet,  the  ancestor  of  the  ancient  family  of  Nisbet  of  that  Ilk,  which 
is  a  local  surname,  and  of  a  very  high  antiquity ;  they  continued  down  till  King 
Charles  I.'s  time,  that  they  fell  low  by  their  sufferings  for  the  royal  cause;  the 
family  was  represented  by  the  learned  herald  and  antiquary  Mr  Alexander  Nisbet, 
who  wrote  the  large  System  of  Heraldry  lately,  that  is  in  every  body's  hands,  and 
was  a  worthy  modest  gentleman,  who  had  as  many  friends,  and  as  few  enemies,  as 
any  man  I  have  known.  Nisbet  of  Dean  is  now  the  best  family  of  the  name,  and 
a  baronet. 

yohn  de  Englys,  may  be  the  Inglises  of  Tarvet  in  Fife,  that  got  Tarvet  by  an 
heiress  of  that  Ilk. 

Alleyn  Dinwithie,  I  apprehend,  is  the  Dinwiddies  of  that  Ilk;  the  family  con- 
tinued long.  I  have  seen  Alexander  Dinwiddle  of  that  Ilk  forfaulted  for  joining^ 
with  the  English,  in  1543,  in  the  records.  There  are  some  people  of  the  name  in 
and  about  Glasgow,  people  of  credit  and  respect,  and  in  the  magistracy. 

'Robert  de  Blackburn;  there  are  people  still  of  that  name,  both  in  Aberdeenshire 
and  in  the  west. 

Adam  Corbet  may  be  Makerston,  or  Hardgray. 

3 


ON  THE  RAGMAN-ROLL.  43 

Ralf  Bioun,  I  fancy,  is  the  Browns  ofCoalston  in  East-Lotliian ;  they  may  be  of 
that  iValterus  le  Broun,  witness  to  a  requisition  of  the  possessions  of  the  church  of 
Glasgow,  by  David,  Comes,  in  the  rei,u,n  of  King  Alexander  L  Thomas  de  Broun  is 
a  witness  to  a  charter  by  Ro^er  de  Mjiibray,  to  the  predecessor  of  the  Lai  ids  of 
Moncrief,  in  the  time  of  King  Alexander  IL  Knathe'C  Ricardustde  Broun  \s  i'oi:- 
laulted  in  the  Black  Parliament  anno  1320:  The  tamily  have  a  charter  from  King 
David  11.  Jjhanni  Broun f/io  David.  Bruun  de  Colstan.  Tlie  family  is  now  split  be- 
twixt the  heirs-male  and  the  heir  of  line. 

Thomas  de  Bunch:  This  must  be  the  Bunkles,  the  old  possessors  of  the  lands  of 
Bonkill  that,  about  this  time,  came  to  the  Stewarts  by  marriage.  Sir  Alexander 
Stewart  of  Bonkill  was  created  Earl  of  Angus  by  King  Robert  the  Bruce  ij-j. 

Walter  Johnslon;  who  this  may  be  I  cannot  say. 

J'jhn  de  Chisome  was  the  Chisholms  of  that  Ilk,  from  whom  flowed  the  once 
great  family  of  the  Chisholms  of  Cromlicks  in  Pertlishire,  they  were  come  of 
Thomas  Ghisholm,  brother  to  a  bishop  of  Dumblane,  in  Kina;  James  IIL  and  IV.'a 
time.  They  were  a  rich  family,  and  had  several  pr.-lates  that  were  sons  of  them, 
and  they  allied  and  intermarried  with  most  of  the  great  families  in  the  country; 
they  are  now  quite  extinct,  and  not  a  memory  left  of  them  in  the  male  line. 

IVilliam  de  Eyton.  This  was  a  very  ancient  family,  and  sprung  from  the  great 
family  of  the  Vescys  in  England,  of  whom  Sir  William  Dugdale  has  given  a  long 
thread  of  pedigree  in  the  Baronage  of  England  ;  they  had  the  great  barony  of 
Sprouston  in  the  south.  The  Ayton  family  was  come  of  Gilbert  de  l-escy,  who, 
getting  the  lands  of  Ayton  in  the  Merse,  took  his  surname  from  the  lands  as  was 
an  usual,  or  rather  a  common  ordinary  way  and  practice;  they  continued  till  King 
James  IlL's  time,  that  a  brother  of  the  House  of  Home  married  the  heiress,  and 
comes  to  be  designed  George  Home  of  Ayton ;  the  lady  had  an  uncle,  her  father's 
younger  brother,  Andrew  Ayton,  captain  of  the  castle  of  Stirling  in  the  days  of 
King  James  IV.  To  whom  that  king  gave  by  his  charter,  "  pro  fideli  &  bono  servitio 
"  terras  de  Nether  Dunmure  in  vicecomitatu  de  Fife,"  in  the  1507.  By  a  new 
charter  from  the  crown,  the  lands  were  called  Ayton,  and  the  family  styled  of  that 
Ilk.  Sir  John  Ayton  of  that  Ilk  left  two  sons;  Robert,  who,  upon  his  succeeding 
to  the  estate  of  his  uncle,  Robert  Lord  Colvil  of  Ochiltree,  in  1729,  assumes  the 
surname  of  Golvil.  The  second,  Andrew  Ayton,  Esq.  late  provost  of  Glasgow, 
who  represents  his  paternal  ancestors,  and  carries  their  arms:  they  had  some  ca- 
dets, as  Ayton  of  Inchdarnie,  Ayton  of  Kippo,  Ayton  of  Kinglassie,  Aytnn  of 
Kinaldy,  &c. 

Johan.  IValeis  de  Overton,  whom  I  know  nothing  of  at  all,  more  than  of  another 
following  him, 

Robert  Russel,  in  the  record. 

IVdliam  de  Bosivel.  This  I  take  to  be  the  ancient  family  of  Boswell  of  Balmuto, 
while  they  resided  in  the  south,  and  before  they  came  to  settle  in  Fife,  where  they 
arrived  to  be  a  very  great  fanvily,  and  were  great  men. 

Robert  de  Ramsay.     This  may  be  the  Dalhousie  family,  of  whom  before. 

Nicol  de  Rutherford  is  the  ancestor  of  the  family  of  Rutherford  of  that  Ilk,  of 
whom  before. 

Seir  Le  Fifz  Thomas  de  Frisle.  As  I  have  obsen^ed  before  in  these  remarks,  the 
Frasers  are  so  numerous  that  they  cannot  well  be  distinguished ;  but  they  are  most 
generally  south  country  Frasers. 

Erchibald  de  Moravia.  This  is  for  certain  the  ancestor  of  the  ancient  family  of 
Faiahall,  now  Philiphaugh,  v.hose  descent  cannot  ht  instructed  from  any  other 
family  of  the  Murrays;  though,  if  I  might  be  allowed  to  make  a  conjecture,  being 
a  south  country  family,  it  is  highly  probable  they  may  be  of  the  iVlurrays  of 
Buthwell,  who  had  Smelholme  and  other  lands  in  the  south:  If  they  be  of  Bothwell, 
they  must  be  a  very  early  cadet;  Archibald  de  Moravia  is  the  first  of  them  that 
is  in  this  record  anno  1296.  The  first  charter  they  have  is  one  granted  by  Jucohus 
Dominus  de  Douglass  to  this  Archibald's  son,  "  Rogero  de  Moravia,  filio  Archi- 
"  baldi  de  Moravia,  de  terris  de  Falla,"  in  the  132 1.  The  charter  is  transumed  by 
Bishop  Dunbar  of  Aberdeen,  Register  in  James  V.'s  time;  there  is  a  precept  di- 
rected from  Henry  Bishop  of  St  Andrews,  to  Bishop  Wardlaw.  in  the  year  1412, 
to  give  sasine  to  WiUiam  Borthwick  of  an  annuity  out  of  the  lands  of  Princado, 


44  HISTORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 

in  the  barony  Stowe.  John  Murray  of  Falahall  gets  a  charter  from  King  James  IV. 
"  Dilecto  tamiliari  sue  Johanni  Murray,"  of  the  half  of  the  lands  of  Philiphaugh, 
on  his  own  resignation,  anno  1508.  He  had  also  another  charter  trom  the  same 
king,  "  de  totis  terris  de  Pitgyl,  ni  vicecomitat.  de  Selkrig,  nee  non  minutas  cus- 
"  tumas  &-  firmas  burgales  viUe  &■  burgi  nostri  de  Selkrig,  una  cum  officio  vice- 
"  comitatus  de  Selkrig;"  the  charter  under  the  Great  Seal  is  dated  the  last  of  No- 
vember 1509  in  the  Register.  John  Murray  of  Philiphaugh  is  now  member  of 
Parliament  for  the  forest  or  shire  of  Selkirk,  whose  family  writs  can  derive  him 
down  from  his  ancestor  in  1321.  There  are  other  Murrays  of  Philiphaugh,  as  the 
the  Murrays  of  Romano,  of  whom  Stanhope,  the  Murrays  of  Skirling,  of  whom 
Melgum  and  Deuchar. 

Laurence  de  Fris/e.     This  is  Drumelzier. 

Jybn  de  Hope.  This  gives  an  ancient  descent  of  the  surname  of  Hope,  almost 
500  years  back. 

Thomas  Biintyng.  There  is  a  family  of  the  name  in  Dumbartonshire,  designed 
of  Ardoch;  but  there  is  no  vouchers  extant  to  connect  betwixt  this  Thomas  and 
them,  though  it  is  probable  they  may  be  of  him. 

Osbeit  de  Chartre  may  be  a  branch  of  the  Charteris  family,  styled  of  Amisfield. 

Nicol  Ker  is  the  ancestor  of  the  Kers  in  the  south j  but  whether  the  Kers  of 
Cessford,  Fernihirst,  or  Saniuelston,  I  cannot  say.  i 

Cbristin  Loccard  may  be  very  probably  one  of  the  ancestors  of  the  most  ancient 
family  of  the  Lockharts  of  Lee,  and  son  of  Sir  Malcolm,  and  father  of  Sir  Simon 
Lockhart  of  Lee,  in  the  131 7,  a  donator  to  the  abbacy  of  Newbottle,  of  whom 
is  the  family  of  Lee  come,  and  all  the  great  branches  and  descendants  of  that  fa- 
mily. 

Robert  de  Betun;  of  whom  before. 

William  de  Moncrief,  the  ancestor  of  the  Moncriefs,  of  whom  before. 

Richard  Mushet ;  this  is  a  very  ancient  family,  designed  in  Latin  de  Montejixo, 
and  were  barons  of  Cargill  in  Perthshire;  Sir  William  de  Montejixo  was  Jiuticiarius 
Scotia  in  the  1332.  By  his  daughter  and  heiress,  the  estates  of  Cargill  and  Stob- 
hall  came  to  Sir  John  Drummond,  one  of  the  ancestors  of  the  noble  family  of 
Perth;  Mushet  of  Burnbank  was  the  heir-male,  but  lately  decayed,  though  severals 
in  Monteith  are  of  them,  as  the  Mushets  of  Craighead,  Cailzichat,  Mill  of  Torr, 
and  Mill  of  Goody. 

Thomas  de  Ramsay.     Who  this  is  I  cannot  say. 

Johem.  Skeen,  Patrick  de  Skeen,  may  be  two  of  the  ancestors  of  the  Skenes  of 
that  Ilk,  father  and  son;  they  had  a  charter  of  the  lands  of  Skene  from  King  Ro- 
bert the  Bruce,  erecting  the  lands  in  a  free  barony.  They  have  letours  from  this 
John's  son  till  the  1624,  and  a  good  account  can  be  drawn  of  them  from  their 
writs  and  charters  in  the  register.  Sir  John  Skene  of  Curriehill,  who  was  Lord 
Register,  and  a  great  man  as  a  lawyer,  was  a  nephew  of  the  family,  the  seventh 
son  of  Robert  Skene  of  Raemore.  A  full  account  can  be  drawn  up  of  the  Skenes, 
and  vouched  from  undoubted  authorities. 

William  fitz  Andrew  de  Douglas.  Mr  Hume,  in  his  History  of  the  Douglasses, 
affords  us  no  light  who  this  gentleman  is,  and  the  truth  is,  1  can  make  no  conjec- 
ture about  him,  if  he  be  not  the  ancestor  of  the  Douglasses  of  Dalkeith,  now  Earls 
of  Morton;  but  this  I  will  not  assert,  only  he  is  ^tiign&A  ael  Conte  de  Lithgow, 
where  their  lirst  possessions  were  ;  or  he  may  be  the  ancestor  of  that  old  branch  of 
the  Douglasses  of  Pumpherston  that  failed  in  Sir  Joseph  Douglas  anno  1681. 

Henry  Craik  seems  to  be  a  south  country  name.  There  is  a  family  still  extant 
of  the  surname  of  Craik,  styled  of  Ardbigland. 

Walter  Ochterlony.  This  without  question  is  the  Auchterlonies,  styled  of  that 
Ilk,  and  of  Kelly  in  Angus,  now  extinct. 

Johan.  de  Morreff.  This  may  be  the  Murrays  of  Blackbarony,  who  claim  an 
ancient  descent  and  independency  from  any  other  Murray  ;  there  is  Alexander  de 
Mj)  avia  of  this  line  in  King  Robert  II.'s  time,  and  John  de  Moravia  de  Black- 
barony in  the  1409.  in  the  registers.  Mr  John  Murray  of  Blackbarony  was  in  fa- 
vour with  James  IV.  who  gets  charters  erecting  a  great  many  lands  into  the  barony 
of  Blackbarony  in  the  1505.     Sir  Alexander  Murray  is  now  of  Blackbarony,  ba- 


ON  THE  RAGMAN-ROLL.  45 

ronet,  who,  by  tlic  similitude  of  his  arms,  seems  to  be  of  the  same  stock  with  the 
JVIurrays  of  Phihphaugh. 

Andrew  Frisel;  who  he  is  I  cannot  teU. 

Joban.  Alonipeniiy,  the  ancient  family  of  Pitmilly  in  Fife,  who  have  writings  in 
Alexander  IL's  time. 

Johan.  IVyscard,  i.  e.  Wishart,  who  is  either  Pittarrow  or  Logic,  both  ancient 
families,  now  extinct. 

Alsyndure  de  Allaidyss,  i.  e.  Allardice  of  that  Ilk,  an  ancient  family  in  the  shire 
of  Kincardine.  They  got  a  charter  of  the  lands  of  Alrethes  horn  King  William, 
since  called  Allardice,  from  whence  is  the  surname;  from  this  time  there  is  a  series^ 
of  writs  in  the  hands  of  the  Laird  of  Allardice.  He  is  heir  of  hne  of  the  Earh  of 
Airth  and  Monteith, 

Humphrey  de  Midleton  is  the  predecessor  of  the  Earls  of  Middleton ;  they  were 
once  a  family  of  note,  but  they  fell  lower  for  some  generations  before.  They  were 
again  raised  to  liigh  honours  and  dignities  by  Lieutenant-General  Middleton, 
created  Earl  of  Middleton  in  the  1661.  Charles  Earl  of  Middleton  was  attainted 
in  Parliament  for  being  in  France  with  the  late  King  James  VIL  where  his  family 
now  resides. 

Robert  le  Falconer,  the  predecessor  of  the  Lord  Halkerton,  in  the  Merns,  or 
shire  of  Kincardine,  a  very  ancient  family  there.  They  have  charters  from  King 
William  the  Lion,  and  have,  in  all  ages  since,  been  considered  as  a  great  baron's 
family.  There  is  a  charter  in  the  registers  of  King  David  to  David  le  Falconer 
jiHolo  juo,  his  godson,  which  is  explained  by  the  clause  in  the  preamble,  "  queni 
"  ex  sacro  fonte  levavimus,"  of  an  annuity  to  him  out  of  lands,  as  from  the  charter 
in  the  register.  A  line  of  the  family,  with  their  marriages  and  alliances,  can  be 
drawn  out  of  the  registers,  and  other  vouchers,  down  to  our  time;  for  the  house 
of  Halkerton  wa«  burnt  by  an  accidental  tire  in  the  1679,  and  the  charter-chest 
utterly  destroyed.  They  were  raised  to  the  peerage  in  the  1647,  as  the  merit  of 
the  great  zeal  and  loyalty  Sir  Alexander  Falconer,  the  head  of  the  family,  had 
shown  in  the  Parhament  that  year,  for  reheving  of  good  King  Charles  from  the 
English  sectaries,  when  he  was  a  prisoner  at  the  Isle  of  Wight.  David,  the  present 
Lord  Halkerton,  is  his  lineal  hei'.--male,  and  so  has  right  to  the  peerage. 

Ricbard  de  Boyvile  del  Conte  ilc  Air,  who  I  take  to  be  the  ancestor  of  the  Boyles 
of  Raysholm  in  the  vvest^  in  Dairy,  and  of  Wamphray  in  Annandalc,  whose 
heiress,  in  King  James  IV. 's  time,  married  a  brother  of  the  House  of  Johnston,  as 
from  a  charter  in  the  records  1513.  Of  this  family  of  the  Boyles  of  Raysholm 
and  Wamphray  the  great  English  Boyles  do  derive  their  origin  and  descent,  and 
acknowledge  themselves  to  be  come  of  the  House  of  Kelburn,  who  are  now  in 
the  dignity  of  Earls  of  Glasgow. 

Andrew  de  Ker  del  Conte  de  S:revelyn.  This  must  be  the  Kers  of  Kilmore  that 
were  of  an  old  standing  in  that  shire.  Sir  Alexander  Ker  of  Kilmore,  in  the 
reign  of  King  James  IV.  left  two  daughters  his  co-heiresses ;  the  eldest  married  a 
son  of  the  Forresters  of  Corstorphine.  and  Agnes  married  John  Stewart,  brother  to 
the  Lord  Evr.ndale ;  of  whom  came  the  Stewarts  of  Kilbeg.. 

Margaret,  who  was  the  wife  oi  Piers  de  Lundy.  This  seems  to  be  the  iamily  of 
Lundie  in  Fife,  who  are  certainly  come  of  a  son  of  King  William  the  Lion,  from 
a  great  many  unquestionable  vouchers;,  of  whom  James  Lundie  of  that  Ilk  is  the 
lineal  heir. 

Roger  de  Houden  is  one  of  the  families- of  the  Haldanes;  of  whom  before. 

Roger  de  Kilpatrick  I  take  to  be  the  Torthorald  branch  of  the  Kirkpatricks, 
which  came  afterwards  to  the  Carlyles  by  marriage;  of  whom  came  the  House  of 
Garlyle. 

Gilbert  de  Johnston,  one  of  the  progenitors  of  the  House  of  Annandale;  of  whom 
before. 

Hewe  de  Orr  is  the  surname  of  Orr,  which  gives  the  name  a  high  antiquity.  I 
have  seen  the  name  in  writs  in  King  James  IV.'s  time ;  it  is  a  numerous  name  in 
the  west  end  of  the  shire  of  Renfrew,  in  the  parish  of  Lochwinnoch,  where  ther  eare 
some  heritors  of  the  name.  John  Orr  of  Barrowtield  has  now  got  a  great  estate; 
but  he  is  originally  extracti;d  from  the  Upper- Ward  of  Clydesdale,  in  the  barony 
of  Cambusnethan. 

Vol.  U.  SB 


46  HISTORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 

Gilbert  Makmaht,  i.  e.  Macmath;  of  which  name  there  was  a  family  styled  of 
thai  Ilk  in  Nithsdale;  of  whom  I  have  seen,  in  the  Dake  of  Q_Lieensberry's  hands, 
a  series  of  writs  smce  the  reign  of  King  James  I.  for  about  300  y^ars. 

Gilbert  de  Carlyle  is  the  ancestor  of  the  Lords  Carlyle.  1  have  seen  an  original 
charter  granted  by  H'illielmus  de  Bruce,  the  ancestor  of  the  great  Lords  of  Annan- 
dale,  to  Adam  de  Carleolo,  of  several  lands  in  Annandale.  The  came  to  be  very 
considerable  barons;  and,  in  King  Robert  the  Bruce's  time,  S  William  de  Cirlyle 
married  iMargaret,  that  king's  sister,  as  from  charters  in  the  register  Thev  be- 
came peers.  Lord  Carlyle,  in  King  James  lll.'s  time,  anno  1473.  In  King 
James  VI. 's  time  the  family  split  betwixt  an  heir-male  and  an  heir  ot  line,  which 
brought  It  to  ruin;  for,  as  Michael  Lord  Carlyle  left  an  elder  son,  who  had  a 
daughter,  so  he  had  a  second  son,  Michael  Carlsle,  to  whom  the  father  designed 
his  estate,  which  was  reduced  at  the  instance  of  his  niece,  his  elder  btotner's 
daughter;  but,  in  the  competition,  the  estate  was  near  torn  to  pieces.  The  lady, 
the  heir  of  line,  married  James  Douglas  of  Parkhead,  whose  son.  James  Douglas  of 
Torthorald,  was  created  Lord  Torthorald  anno  i6oy.  The  right  to  the  digniiy  still 
resides  in  William  Carlyle  of  Lochartor,  in  the  stewartry  of  Kirkcudbright,  as 
heir-male  and  of  line  to  Michael  Carlyle,  son  to  Michael  the  last  Lord  Carlyle,  to 
whom  he  was  served  and  retoured  heir  not  long  since. 

Thomas  de  Colvyle  is  the  Colvil  of  Oxnam  in  the  south,  whose  son.  Robert,  as  I 
take,  came  to  the  estate  of  Ochiltree,  as  heir-male,  in  the  1324,  as  from  the  char- 
tulary  of  Melrose,  belonging  to  the  Earl  of  Haddington. 

Adam  de  Colvile  is  another  branch  of  the  House  of  Ochiltree,  of  whom  I  cannot 
say  any  more. 

Hllliam  de  Harris  is,  no  question,  the  progenitor  of  the  Herrieses  of  Terreagles, 
who  came  to  be  Lords  Herries  of  Terreagles  in  King  James  IV.'s  time;  and,  in  the 
1543,  ended  in  three  co-heiresses;  of  the  eldest  came  the  Maxwells  Lord  Herries, 
that  came  to  be  conjoined  with  the  dignity  of  the  Earl  of  Nithsdale,  since  the  re- 
storation of  King  Charles  II. 

John  Bard,  and  Robert  Bard.  I  think  these  two  gentlemen,  of  the  surname  of 
Baird,  are  the  two  families  of  the  Bairds  of  Evandale  and  Cambusnethan.  Cam- 
busnethan  came  by  marriage,  in  King  David's  days,  to  Sir  Alexander  Stewart^ 
afterwards  of  Darniy  and  Cruxston,  who  gave  the  lands  of  Cambusnethan  to  Janet 
his  daughter,  and  to  Sir  Thomas  Somerville  of  Carnwath,  her  husband,  in  the  1390. 
He  was  afterwards  honoured  and  invested  with  the  dignity  of  Lord  Somerville 
14:7.  A  family  in  Banffshire  seems  to  be  derived  from  them,  Baird  of  Ordinhoof, 
of  whom  came  the  Bairds  of  Auchmedden,  and  of  them  again  the  Bairds  of  New- 
byth  and  Saughtonhall,  both  baronets. 

Fergus  del  Schaw;  who  this  is  I  cannot  say,  but  doubtless  it  is  some  branch  of 
the  House  of  .^auchie  or  Haylley. 

Renauld  de  Cratifoide.  This  gentleman  may  be  either  Sir  Reginald  of  Loudon, 
the  younger,  or  Reginald,  some  of  the  Kerse  family,  or  the  head  of  the  House  of 
Auchinames  ;  and  the  same  Reginald  de  Crawford  to  whom  King  Robert  1.  gives  an 
annuity  out  of  the  lands  of  Ormsheugh;  and,  as  I  take  it,  the  Reginald  Craw- 
furd.  grandson  to  Thomas  Cravvfurd  of  Auchinames,  who,  in  1401,  makes  a  mor- 
tification of  a  chaplainry  in  the  church  of  Kilbarchan,  "  pro  anima  Reginald! 
"  de  Crawford  avi  sui."     Of  whom  there  is  a  series  of  the  House  of  Auchinames. 

Alan  le  Calyntar,  one  of  the  House  of  C  .llendar  del  Conte  de  Strivelyn. 

William  Br'un  de  Gamelshiells,  a  family  of  the  Browns,  of  whoml  can  say  nothing, 
if  it  be  not  the  ancestors  of  the  Brovvns  of  Coalston  under  this  designation. 

Robert  MaeConib;  this  the  surname  of  Malcolm,  of  which  there  are  some  gentle- 
men in  Fife  ;  this  gives  it  a  high  antiquity. 

Frere  Alysandre  de  Argyle,  some  churchmen  of  the  House  of  Lorn,  de  Ergadia 
and  then  Macdougal. 

Thurbrand  de  Logan.  The  surname  is  ancient,  being  found  in  the  charters  of 
the  Constables  to  their  vassals  in  Cunningham,  in  the  reign  of  Alexander  U.  in  the 
Earl  of  Loudon's  hands,  granted  to  the  Crawfurds  his  predecessors;  but  whether 
the  ancestor  of  the  west  country  Logans,  or  the  Hi.use  of  Restalrig,  or  of  both,  I 
cannot  say ;  but  I  am  sure  the  House  of  Restalrig,  in  the  time  of  King  Robert  II.. 
had  the  barony  of  Grugar  in  Cunningham. 
3 


ON  THE  RAGMAN-ROLL.  47 

John  de  Corbet,  another  tamily  of  the  Corbels  besides  Makerston,  likely  the 
Corbels  of  Hardgray,  of  wliom  before ;  of  them  are  the  Corbels  of  Towcross  in 
Lanarkshire. 

Sir  Htfrbert  de  Maccusuel,  i.  e.  Maxwell,  one  of  the  ancestors  of  the  great 
and  noble  family  of  Maxwell  that  have  made,  as  well  in  ancient  as  in  more  110- 
dern  times,  so  great  a  liguie  m  our  history,  and  have  so  meritoriously  been 
raised  to  honours,  dignities,  and  high  commands,  in  the  service  of  their  country  : 
they  were  Peers,  Lords  of  FarUament,  at  the  rirst  institution  of  that  honour  by 
King  James  \.  as  soon  as  the  1429  (  >).  The  family  attained  to  be  Earls  of  Mor- 
ton in  tue  1551,  on  the  fall  of  the  regent  Morton  ;  but  that  dignity  being  restored 
to  the  Douglasses  of  the  House  of  Lochleven,  the  family  of  Maxwell  was  in  lieu 
ef  the  fomer  dignity,  made  Earl  of  Nithsdale. 

Sir  Richard  Fruser  is  some  of  the  south  country  Erasers  of  the  House  of  Tweed- 
dab,  who  are  designed  sometimes  in  old  writs  Vicecomites  de  2'ravockquair,  which 
I  take  to  be  the  sheriifship  of  Peebles ;.  to  his  name  is  added  del  Conte  de  Drunu 
/rise. 

J  nn^s  de  Lindsay  is  well  known  to  be  the  ancestor  of  the  great  family  of  the 
Li.ids  lys  of  Dunrod.  It  was  he  that  assisted  iving  Robert  L  to  dispatch  the  per- 
fidious Cumin  in  the  church  of  Dumfries,  ilis  heir  and  successor,  John  Lindsay 
of  Dunrod,  gets  charters  from  Ring  Robert  111.  when  he  was  Earl  of  Carnck,  of 
the  Mains  of  Kilbride,  which  is  confirmed  by  the  king  his  father  in  the  1374,  in 
the  registers  I  have  seen  ;  they  became  a  great  family,  and  had  a  vast  estate,  both 
in  the  shu-e  oi  Lanark  and  Renfrew,  where  the  lands  of  Dunrod  lie.  They  con- 
tinued till  King  James  Vl.'s  time,  that  Alexander  Lindsay  of  Dunrod  falling  in 
bloodshed,  and  having  killed  the  laird  of  Leckie  of  that  Ilk,  his  estate  visibly 
melted  away,  and  he  suftered  a  great  reverse  of  fortune  ;  for  he,  who  had  once  so 
great  an  estate,  came  to  beg  his  bread  amonj^  his  friends  before  he  died,  as  I  have 
been  credibly  informed  by  old  people,  who  knew  him  in  the  decline;  of  his  age,, 
in  that  poor  situation.  The  family  of  Dunrod  is  represented  by  William  Lindsay 
late  of  Blackholm  and  Balquharage,  who  bears  the  arms. 

Sir  jrllexander  de  Lindsay  is  the  ancestor  of  the  Lindsays  of  Barnwell  and. 
Craigie,  or  a  branch  of  them. 

Allan  de  Moreff,  del  Conte  de  Forres,  is  a.  north  country  Murray  of  the  House 
of  Duffus  and  who  came  to  be  designed  of  Coubin. 

Sir  Dovenald  Cambel,  del  Conte  de  Dunbarton  ;  I  see  no  other  Sir  Donald  Camp- 
bell at  the  time,  but  Sir  Donald  who  is  of  Redcastle,  and  the  same  noble  person 
who  gives  the  half  of  the  barony  of  Redcastle  to  Sir  Duncan  Campbell  of  Loudon, 
his  son,  and  is  the  Dovenaldus  Cambel  who  is  one  of  the  Barones  Regni  Scotice  who 
write  the  memorable  letter  to  the  Pope,  in  the  1320,  anent  King  Robert  the 
Bruce,  and  the  independency  of  Scotland. 

Sir  Willi, an  de  Rotbwcn,  i.  e.  Ruthven,  the  ancestor  of  the  Ruthvens  of  that 
Ilk,  of  whom  came  the  Earls  of  Cowrie  ;  of  whom  before. 

Sir  Archibald  de  Livingston  ;  of  whom  before. 

Sir  Ntcol  de  Graham,  del  Conte  de  Litbgow,  is,  as  I  think,  that  branch  of  the 
Grahams  of  Abercorn  that  I  think  came  afterwards  to  the  Mores  by  marriage  of 
the  heiress. 

Thomas  de  Dahiel,  the  predecessor  of  the  Dalziels  of  that  Ilk  in  Lanarkshire  ; 
the  name  is  ancient  and  local  ;  how  thev  lost  the  estate  of  Dalziel  I  cannot  say, 
but  likely  by  forfeiture :  They  were  given  by  King  David  Bruce,  "  Malcolmo 
"  Fleemmg,  mditi,  quod  ipsi  habeant  teneant  et  possideant  baroniam  de  Lanzie, 
"  baroniam  de  Kilmaromck,  et  omnes  terras  suas  baronis  de  Dalziel,  et  omnes 
"  alias  terras  quas  de  nobis  tenet  in  capite,  in  liberam  warrenam  in  perpetuuni, 
"  apui  Castram  de  Kildrummy,  vicesimo  die  mensis  Junii,  anno  regni  nostri 
"  tertio  decimo,  1343"  {b).  The  estate  of  Dalziel  came  next  to  Robertas  de  la 
Fal,  but  not  Dalziel ;  tor  there  is  a  charter  by  the  same  King  David  II.  "  Roberto 
"  Senescallo  de  Shandbothy  de  terns  de  Dalziel  et  de  Modervile  infra  vicecomi- 


C<7j  Dtcreet  of  Parliament  in  the  Registers.     (l>)  In  the  hands  of  Mr  Hamilton  of  Daliiel. 


48  HISTORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS 

*'  tatum  de  Lanerk,  nos  contingentes  pro  eo,  quod  haeredes  quondam  Roberti  de 
"  la  Val,  militis,  contra  fidein  ct  pacem  nostram  in  Anglia  commorantur,  tenend, 
«  et  liabend.  eidem  Roberto  et  ha.'redibiis  suis  in  liberam  baioniam,  adeo  liberum 
"  :;icut  quondam  Malcolmiis  Fleemmg  et  Robertus  de  la  Val  eandem  tenueiunt." 
The  charter  under  the  Great  Seal  is  dated  the  20th  of  March,  the  33d  year  of  the 
kuig's  reign,  i.  e.  1363  («). 

1  think  the  heirs  of  Sir  Robert  de  la  Val  have  been  restored  to  the  barony  of 
Daiiiel  and  Moderville,  which,  by  two  co-heiresses,  came  to  Sir  Duncan  Wallace 
and  J'ihn  de  Nisbet,  who,  in  a  writ  I  have  seen  (6),  are  designed  Domini  participes 
bnronice  dc  Daiziel :  that  imports  that  they  were  heirs  portioners  of  the  estate  ;  Sir 
Duncan  W.illace  gave  his  part  baronice  de  Dnlziel  et  de  Modervile,  failing  heirs 
of  himself  and  his  second  wife,  as  I  take  it,  Kleanora  de  Bruce,  Comitissii  de  Cur- 
rick  ;  she  was  Countess  Dowager  of  Carrick,  and  herself  a  daughter  of  Sir  Archi- 
bald Douglass,  sister  to  William  first  Earl  of  Douglas,  and  widow  of  Sir  James 
S  .a.lilands  of  that  Ilk.  He  provides  the  estate  of  Daiziel  to  Sir  James  Sandiiands, 
his  lady's  son;  the  charter  from  the  crown  is  dated  in  the  1374  {c).  Sir  James 
S;i;idilands  of  Calder  alienated  the  barony  of  Dalziel  to  George  Daiziel,  son  of  Sir 
IV.lliam  de  Daiziel,  which  is  confirmed  by  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal,  5th 
July,  the  5th  of  Robert  II.  1395,  by  the  charter  proceeding  on  Sir  James  Sandi- 
lands'  resignation,  whom  the  king  calls  his  brother,  being  married  to  his  sister. 
The  estate  is  limited  to  the  heirs-male  of  George  de  Daiziel,  the  receiver  of  the 
charter,  and  to  the  heirs-male  of  his  body  ;  which  failing  to  the  heirs-male  of 
Sir  Witliam  de  Dulziel,  his  father,  whatsoever.  From  this  gentleman  descended 
the  following  series  of  the  lairds  of  Daiziel,  who  were  raised  to  be  Lords  Daiziel 
in  1628,  and  in  1639  Earl  of  Carnwath.  I  shall  just  stay  so  much  longer  on  this 
remark  as  to  observe  that  the  other  half  of  the  barony  of  Daiziel,  that  was  John 
Nisbet's  part,  laid  the  foundation  of  the  Nisbets,  called  barons  ot  the  half  barony 
of  Daiziel  and  Moderville  {d),  that  were  a  good  family  and  subsisted  till  King 
(.'harles  l.'s  time.  Of  this  branch  of  the  Nisbets,  of  the  ancient  family  of  the  Nisbets 
of  .hat  Ilk,  flowed  the  Nisbets  of  Dean,  being  descended  of  Adam  Nisbet,  a  son 
of  the  ba-rns  of  Daiziel,  who  came  to  Edinburgh  a  merchant  in  King  James  IV.'s 
tinv'.g^  S.r  Patrick  Nisbet  of  Dean,  baronet,  informed  the  author  of  these  Remarks., 

David  Moreff]  Parsona  Ecclesite  de  Botbwel.  This  is  a,  clergyman  perhaps  of 
the  House  of  Bothvvell,  who  were  then  of  the  same  surname,  and  was  long  before 
the  founding  the  College  Kirk  of  Bothwell  by  the  Earl  of  Douglas  in  the. 
1398. 

Robert  de  Ciininghavie  :  This  is  Cunningham  for  certain,  and  the  same  noble 
person  who  had  a  charter  under  the  Great  Seal  from  King  Robert  the  Bruce, 
of  the  lands  of  Lambrochton,  and  is  the  ancestor  of  the  noble  family  of  Glen- 
cairn. 

Walter  fitz  Gilbert  de  Homildon  is  the  same  great  man  that  is  mention- 
ed before  in  this  record,  and  on  whom  we  have  made  remarks  and  some 
critical  observations  before.  All  that  we  shall  add  here  is,  that  he  must  be  a  very 
considerable  person,  and  possessed  of  an  estate  in  different  places,  when  he  is 
swearing  fealty  to  the  King  of  England  at  different  counties ;  though  by  the  by 
he  seems  to  have  a  special  relation  to  the  shire  of  Lanark. 

Alisundre  Scot  de  Perthick :  From  writs  I  have  seen  he  had  the  lands  of  Per- 
thick-Scott,  that  is,  the  lands  of  Scotston  in  Renfrewshire,  which  from  him  came 
to  Nicolaus  de  Strivelyn  de  Busbie;  and,  by  his  daughter  and  heir,  to  John  Semple,, 
;i  brother  of  the  House  of  Elliotston,  whom,  in  the  1409,  I  have  found  designed; 
Lord  ot  Perthick  (e).  By  his  daughter  and  heiress  the  estate  came  to  Sir  Walter 
Stewart  of  Arthuily,  son  to  Sir  William  Stewart  of  Castlemiik,  who  I  see  so  de- 
signed in  a  charter  in  1439,  in  the  register,  and  another  in  the  Lord  Ross's  hands. 
He  had  two  daughters,  the  one  married  to  William  Park  of  that  Ilk,  and  again 
to  William  Cunningham  of  Craigends,  sen  to  Alexander  first  Earl  of  GIencairn„, 

(o)  Ibidem,  (4)  Penes  Hugh  Crawfurd,  Writer  to  the  Signet  in  Edinburgh,  mentioned  in  the  Life- 
of  Sii  John  Lyon  of  Giammis,  Chamberlain,  [c)  Penes Daliic!.  (</)  Eamock's  writs.  («.)  Penes  du' 
cem  dc  Montrose, . 


HISTORICAL  AND  CRITICAL  REMARKS,  &c.  4^ 

and  got  Avtliurly  and  other  lauds.  The  second  daughter  was  married  to  Thomas 
Stewart  of  Muito,  second  son  to  Sir  WiUiam  Stewart  of  Gairlies,  and  got  the 
lands  of  Perthick-Scott,  Ss-c. ;  of  whom  the  Loid  Blantyrc  is  the  Hneal  heir- 
male. 

Anauhd,  who  was  tlie  wife  of  Sir  Patrick  Graham.  It  is  hard  to  distinguish  the 
Grahams  at  tliis  time  ;  for  Patrick  is  then  the  head  of  the  Kincardine  family  and 
also  of  the  Lovat  Grahams:  but  which  of  them  this  lady  is  the  wife  of,  I  cannot 
well  say. 

Juhiiii,  de  Craivfotd  del  Conte  de  Air,  is,  without  all  question,  a  branch  of  the 
House  of  Loudon  ;  But  the  truth  is,  whether  he  be  the  Kerse  famdy,  the  Tar- 
ringin  Crawfurds,  the  Auchinames  Crawfords,  the  Ardoch  Crawfurds,  since  called 
Crawfurdland  or  the  Haining  Crawfm^ds,  who  seem  plainly  to  be  all  then  sub- 
M.vting,  is  bard  to  say ;  and,  at  best,  what  might  be  said  would  be  no  more  than 
conjectural. 

iVillium  de  Strivelyn  :  This  gentleman,  being  found  in  the  west,  is  doubtless  one  of 
the  line  of  the  Stirlings  of  Calder,  who  seem  to  be  the  root  of  all  the  other  Stirlings, 
and  from  whom  all  the  rest  of  the  Stirlings  in  the  western  parts  are  descended. 
1  think  that  in  these  remarks  I  have  already  hinted  at  the  surname,  and  some  of 
the  branches  of  the  family,  and  shall  add  no  more  here. 

Andrew  fitz  Gadofrcde  de  Ross  del  Conte  de  Air  :  This  is  for  certain  a  younger 
son  of  the  House  of  Tarbet  in  Cunningham.  They  came  to  be  great  men,  and 
mighty  favourites  with  Robert  Bruce,  and  got  many  lands  from  him.  The  Lord 
Ross  is  the  representative  of  the  Rosses  of  Tarbet;  and  this  Andrew  may  be  the 
ancestor  of  the  Rosses  of  Haining,  Galston,  and  Montgrenan.  James  Ross  of 
Portivo,  son  and  heir  of  George  Ross  of  Galston,  represents,  and  is  heir  of,  the 
House  of  Haining  and  Galston,  which  is  an  ancient  family. 

Mary,  the  wife  of  Hewe  de  Airth,  is  the  ancestor  of  the  Airths  of  that  Ilk,  del 
Conte  de  Stirling^  that  came  to  be  heiresses  in  King  James  XL's  time,  as  we  formerly 
remarked  in  the  observations  and  critical  remarks  on  this  record. 

Richard  de  Kinnaird,  del  Conte  de  Fife.  It  would  seem  that  the  ancient  family 
of  Kinnaird  had  then  an  estate  in  Fife,  as  well  as  in  Forfarshire,  where  the  bulk 
of  their  estate  lay.  It  cannot  be  the  family  of  Inchture  that  is  here  mentioned, 
as  some  groundlessly  may  fancy  ;  for  they  did  not  begin  till  King  Robert  Ill.'s 
time,  that  a  son  of  the  family  of  Kinnaird  married  the  heiress  of  the  House  of 
Inchture,  of  the  surname  of  Kirkaldy,  as  is  evident  from  original  writs  in  the 
hands  of  the  Lord  Kinnaird,  that  are  mentioned  in  the  Peerage  6f  Scotland,  in  the 
article  of  the  Lord  Kinnaird.  And  with  this  I  shall  end  my  Historical  and  Criti- 
cal Remarks  on  the  Ragman-Roll,  or  the  Fealty  and  Submission  that  was  sworn 
to  by  the  generality  of  the  Freeholders ;  so  universal  it  was,  that  not  only  we 
see  the  comites  and  the  barones  regni  Scotice,  but  the  libere  tenentes,  and  even  the 
toinmutdtates  hurgorum,  go  all  mostly  into  a  thing  that  no  doubt  was  so  much 
against  the  grain  with  most  of  them. 


FINIS. 


THE 


INDEX 


sURNJMES,  COUNTRIES,  FJMILIES,  JND  PERSONS,  WHOSE 

J  RMS  ARE  MENTIONED  IN  MR  NISBETS  SYSTEM 

OF  HERALDRY,   PART  IIL 


p 

age. 

Page 

Page. 

A    BERBROTHOCK 
_/\_  Aberdeen 

77 

Arthur  Kmg  of  Britain 

94 

Beaton  Archbishop  of  Glas 

. 

65 

St  Asaph  Bishopric  thereof 

40 

gow 

39 

Abcrnethy         -         -          8 

,82 

Aubigny           -         _     - 

81 

Beaumont  Lady  Cramond 

70 

Lord  Abernethy 

44 

ib. 

Beanchittie,  Jean 

67 

Achaius  King  of  Scotland  60 

98 

Avesnes,  a  Signioryin  Hainault  6 

Beauvais,  Bishop  and  Cour 

t 

Adolphus,  Gustavus,  K.  of 

of           -           -          - 

38 

Sweden       - 

66 

Bedford,  Duke  of 

9S 

St  Alban's,  Duke  of 

25 

B 

Berkley,  Lord 

Alexander  II.  and  III.  Kings 

of  Wymondham 

ib. 

of  Scotland 

99 

Ballcnden  Lord  Ballenden 

57 

Bertie  Earl  of  Abingdon 

I- 

Ambleville,  Lord 

47 

ib. 

Biggar  of  Wolmct 

56 

Amelia,  Princess 

i°3 

Badenoch 

83 

Bishops  of  Scotland's   arms 

38, 

Annandale 

82 

Balfour  of  Tarry 

39 

,  40 

St    Andrews,    Bishoprick 

Balsac  Sieur  d'Entragncj 

81 

Bishops  of  Enc;land's  arms 

40 

of       -           -          33,  39 

76 

Banhaird  of  Carnegie 

48 

Bisset  of  Balw'ylo 

78 

Angus         -         - 

82 

Bannantyne  of  Kamcs 

9 

Blair  of  that  Ilk 

57 

Anne,  Princess 

10:5 

of  Kelly 

ib. 

Bohemia,  King  of 

41 

Anstruther  of  that  Ilk 

84 

Barclay              -            21,  49 

77 

Booth  of  Barton 

S9 

Antioch,  Prince  of 

61 

Bourbon,  Lord 

8 

Anjou,  Earl  and  Duke  of  ; 

S5 

of  Cullcrny 

78 

of  Montpensicr 

ib. 

87,  89 

94 

Carton  of  that  Ilk 

"^9 

d'Evcreux         - 

ib. 

Aquitaine,  Duke  of 

89 

Bartolus  the  Lawyer 

65 

Bohun  Earl  of  Hereford 

93 

Arbuthnot  of  that  Ilk  8,  19 

5° 

Bavaria,  Duke  of 

41 

Bologne         -         -         . 

8 

Barjolou,  Count  of 

87 

Bologne,  Earl  of 

89 

of  Fiddes 

'9 

Baudry,  Count  of  Drcux 

46 

Boyd  Lord  Boyd 

83 

ib. 

Beaufort,  Duke  of 

9':, 

Boyd  Earl  of  Arran 

ib. 

Arragon,  the  kingdom  of  68 

87 

Beaufort  Earl  of  Somerset  1 1 

26 

Boyle  Earl  of  Glasgow 

61 

Arran              -              41,52 

83 

II 

of  Kelburn 

ib. 

Argyle,  Bishoprick  thereof 

40 

Cardinal  and  Bishop  ib. 

of  HalkshiU 

ib. 

Argenson,  Count  of 

66 

79 

Earl  of  Burlington 

ib. 

Arnoldus  Arescoti  Comes 

3 

Beaton  of  Balfour 

39 

Brabant,  Duke  of 

55 

Vol.  II. 

il 

INDEX  OF  SURNAMES,  ^r. 


Brandon  Duke  of  Suffolk 
Brandenburg,  Duke  of 
Brand,  Sir  Thomas 
Brechin,  Bishop  of 

,  Lumquhat 

,  Lord  49,  76, 


Page. 


Bretagne,  Duke  of  -  7 

Brisbane  of  Bishopton  58 

Brown         ...  63 

Bruce  -  -  18,  70 

Earl  of  Carrick  77 

,  King  Robert  77,  87 

,  King  David  -  91 

Brunswick,  Duke  of  31,  41,  60 
63,  103,  104 
Brutus,  King  -  88 

Buckland  or  Bowland  74 

Buchan  -  -  77,  85 

,  Earl  of  -  79 

Bo!eyne,Marchioness  of  Pem- 
broke -  -  73 
Bullock,  Sir  William  7S 
Burly  -  -  -  51 
Burgundy,  Duke  of  5,  1 1,  26, 
27,29,31,34,35.5' 
Butler  of  Senlis           -            41 

Duke  of  Ormond  ib. 

E.  of  Ossory         -       ib. 

E.  of  Arran  -        ib. 


Campbell  Earl  and  Duke  of 
Argyle  -  4>  83,  84 

Earl  of  Loudon   4,  49 

Earl  of  Lundie         35 

Earl  of  Breadal- 

bane         -  -  5°>  84 

of  Glenorchy     83,  84 

of  Otter         -  83 

Gary  Baron  of  Hunsdon  72 

Viscount  of  Falkland     i  o  7 

Callender  of  that  Ilk         -       51 

Carnegie  Earl  of  Southesk   21, 

42,  so 

Earl  of  Northesk      21 

of  Kinnaird  50 

Caithness,  Earl  of  -  84 
Catzenel-bogen  -  105 
Canterbury ,  Archbishoprlck  of  40 
Carrick,  Earl  of  -  6 
Cairncross  Arch,  of  Glasgow  39 
Cadwallader  King  of  England  95 
Cameron  Bishop  of  Glasgow  39 
Caraffa,  Tiberius  -  23 
Carmichael  of  that  Ilk  13 
Portioner  of  Lit- 
tle Blackburn  -  ib. 
Castile  and  Leon,  King  of  30, 
43,  86,  87 
Carron,  Sir  Alexander  69 
Cavendish,  Duke  of  Newcastle  1 4 

Earl  of  Devonshire  ib. 

Cecil  Earl  of  Salisbury  ib. 

Challons  -  105 

Chalon  Prince  of  Orange        55 


Page. 


25 


Charles  IL  K.  of 

bastards 
Chatto 

Chaumont,  Viscount  of  46 

Chester,  Earl  of  18,  59,  76 

Churchill  Duke  of  Marlbo- 


rough 
Cheyne  of  Duffus 
Chisholm 

Cibo  Prince  of  Massa 
Clark,  Sir  John 
Clarence,  Duke  of 
Clarges,  Anne 
Clusis,  Robert  de 
Clermont,  Tallart 

Count  of 


-  67 
19 
ib 
68 
72 
24.  94 
67 
65 


Clifford,  Lord 

Earl  Cumberland 

of  Frampton 

Cliffords  of  Kent 
Clifton 

Cobham,  Lord 

of  Sterbury 

of  Blackbury 

of  Billockly 

Cochran  of  that  Ilk 


Earl  of  Dundonald  ib. 

Compton  E.  of  Northampton  66 
Comesing  Vise,  of  Cozerans     9 


Combet,  Nicol 
Cornwall,  Earl  of  -  7 

Constable  Vise,  of  Dunbar    108 
Crawfurd  of  Loudon  3 

of  Cartsburn  10 

of  Henning  39 

■ —  Abbot  of  Holyrood- 

house  -  -  ib. 

Duke  of  Montrose  83 

Crichton,  Lord  -  80 

Cumin         -         -         -  30 

of  Rowallen       -        61 

Earl  of  Buchan    79,  80 

of  Coulter         -  79 

Cunningham  of  Brownhill      16 

D 


Dalrymple  Earl  of  Stair  36 

Dampetra,  Lord  7,  8 

Danes  conquer  England  88 

Denmark  -  84,  85 

Dietz  -  -  105 

Digby  Earl  of  Bristol  1 5 

Douglas         -  -  3,  53 

,  Earl  and  Duke  of  3, 44, 

45,52.  7'>77>79>  82 

Earl  of  Morton  79 

of  Whittinpham  4 

Earl  of  Ormond  3 

Earl  of  Marr        45,  82 

of  Pitsligo  53 

D.of  Queensberry69,82 

of  Liddesdale  78 

Earl  of  Buchan  79 

— Earl  of  Angus      82,  83 

Earl  of  March  80 

I 


Page. 
Douglas  Earl  of  Murray         82 

Duke  of  Touraine 

Lord  of  Galloway 

Drummond,  Lord 
of  Carlowrie 


82 
ib. 

80 
16 

Duniblane,  Bishoprick  of  40 
Dunbar  Earl  of  March  9,  80,  82 

Arch,  of  Glasgow      39 

Dunfermline,  abbey  of  88 
Dundas  of  that  Ilk  -  3 
of  Newliston               36 


Edward  I.  K.  of  England   7,  89 
I.  and  II.  K.  of  Eng- 
land -  -  .  ^o 

II.  and  III.  K.  of 

England  44,  61,  91,  92, 

IV.  and  V.  K.  of 

England         .  .  pj 

VI.  K.  of  England     96 

the  Confessor  K.  of 

England  -  61,  88 

Edinburgh,  Bishoprick  of        40 
Edgar  Atheling   comes   to 

Scotland         -  .  88 

Eiden,  Jacob  Van         -  69 

Elizabeth  O.  of  England  34,  97 
Elizabeth,  Princess       -  103 

Elphinstone,  Lord         -  19 

Lord  Balmerino  ib. 


England,  Kings  of,  their  vari- 
ous arms  from  88 — 97 
Erskine  Earl  of  Marr  21,49,  52, 
70,79,80,  81,  82,  85 

Earl  of  Kelly  21,  70,  73 

of  Cambo  42,  71 

Lord  Cardross      57,  79 

E.  of  Buchan  64,  79,  80 

Lord  Dirleton  Vise. 

of  Fenton         -         -  70 

Sir  Thomas  73 

Evercux  -  -  81 


Fairholme  of  Craigiehall  36 

Falconbridge,  Lord         -  cj 

Fergus  I.  King  of  Scotland     97 
Ferrara,  Lord  of         -  60 

Fife,  Earl  of         -         -  76 

Finch  Countess  of  Winchelsea  72 
Flacourt,  Lord  -  ^y 

Flanders,  Earl  of  7,  29,  51,  76, 
Fleming  .  _  ^p 

of  Biggar         -  78 

Earl  of  Wigton  49 

of  Barrachin  59 

Forbes  Lord  Forbes  J3 

of  Warterton         -       18 

of  Tolquhon  18,  jj 

Lord  Pitsligo  r  3 

of  Riras  -  ib. 

Forrester  of  Carden        -  16 
of  Denoven             ib. 


INDEX  OF  SURNAMES,  ^c. 


Page. 
Foulis,  Lord  -  48 

of  CoUiiigton         -       21 

France,  King  of  30,  3  5 ,  9 1  to  94 
when  the  sons  there- 
of differenced  their  amis  5,6, 
Frazer  -  19,  30,  77 

of  Bro.idland        -         15 

of  Philorth  IJ,  53 

Lord  Lovat  -  19 

of  Ohvevcastle  5  I 

Bishop  of  St  Andrews  38 

Frederick,  Piiiice  -  102 
Fullerton  of  that  Ilk  -  14 
of  Crai-jhull  ib. 


Hamilton  of  Wliitlaw 

of  Bangour 

of  Orbiston 


Galloway 

-■ —  Bislioprick 

Garden  of  Leys 
Mr  James 


4 J,  S2 

40 

ib. 
-  42 
45'  76 
11.93 


Garter  King  at  arms 

Garioch 

Gaunt,  John  of 

Genoa 

George  St         -  -  61 

George  K. of  Britain  60,101,102 

Prince  of  Wales,  now 

also  King  thereof  102 

Gilford  of  Yester         -  5 1 

Glen  of  Inchmartin  -  53 
Gloucester,  Duke  of  -  11 
Gloucester,  Earl  and  Duke  of  24, 

27.  95 
Glasgow  Bishoprick  39 

Gordon  M.  of  fiuntly  13,  52,  81 

Earl  of  Aberdeen        69 

Duke  of  Gordon        83 

Earl  of  Aboyne    13,  69 

Gray  Lord  Gray  -  49 
Grey  of  Groby            -  95 
Graham           -              -  76 
E.  and  D.  of  Mon- 
trose        -            -          18,  83 

of  Inchbraikie  1 8 

Earl  of  Strathern  and 


Monteith 
Greig  of  Ballingrie 
Grafton,  Duke  of 
Guiles,  Earl  of 
Guthrie  of  tliat  Ilk 

H. 


30,85 
10 
25 
46 
49 


Hall  of  Fulbar.  -  59 

Hamilton  L.  and  D.  of  Ha- 
milton  10,  15,49,52,59,83 

Earl  of  Arran  83 

Earl  of  Abercorn         7 

E.of  Haddingtonio,64 

Earl  of  SelkiVk  52 

of  Reidhouse  10 

of  Pries.field  ib. 

of  Ladylands  ib. 

of  Torrence  ib. 

of  Westbuin  ib. 


Page 

■5 

-      ib. 


ib. 


Herries  of  Cousland 

,  Lord 

Hastings  Earl  of  Pembroke     44 
Hay  Eari  of  Errol        13,  31,  64 


of  Yester 

Earl  of  Tweeddak     16,  51 

Earl  of  Kinnoul  7 1 

Viscount  of  Duplin  ib. 

of  Seaficld  -  13 

of  Fuddy         -         -        ib. 

,  William,  Bailie  of  Edin.  16 

Henry,  Prince  -  81 

Menneburg,  Prince  of  31 

Henry  II.  King  of  England     89 

III.  &  IV.  8,90,93 

V.  &VL  93,94 

vn.  95,95 

VIII.  62,  96 

Hepbuni  of  Humbie  21 
of  Waujjhton 


ib. 


Herring  of  Gilmerton  5 

—  of  Lethendy       -  ib. 

of  Carswell         -        ib. 

Holstein  _  -  85 

Holland  Duke  of  Exeter  1 1 

Earl  of  March  5 1 

Home  L.andE.of  Home3,2i,5i 

of  Wcdderburn      21,51 

Earl  of  Mardimont      ib. 

of  Alton  -  53 

Commendator  of  Jed- 
burgh -  -  39 
Hope  of  Cragiehall         -  9 

of  Rankeilor  ib. 

Houston  of  that  Ilk  58 

Howard  D.  of  Norfolk  i6,  30,  96 

Earl  of  Suffolk  16 

Earl  of  Berkshire         1 5 

Baron  of  Escrick         ib. 

Hungary,  King  of         -  61 

Huntingdon,  Earl  of     6,  76,  87 


James  I.  K.  of  Scotland 

IV. 

VI.  87,100,: 

Jardine  of  Applegirth 
Innes  of  that  Ilk 
Joceline  de  Lovaine 
Johnston  -  -  _ 
Marq.  of  Annan- 
dale           -           -  19, 
Irvine  of  Drum 
of  Kingoussie 


Keith  Earl  Marischal   19,  30,  39 

of  Arthurhouse       -        19 

Kennedy  Earl  of  Cassilis         8  a 


Page. 
Kennedy  of  Ardistenshire  66 
Kent,  Earl  of  11,85,93 

Kendal,  Baron  of       -        18,  59 
Ker  of  Cessford  -  21 

of  Littledean  -  ib. 

Earl  of  Roxburgh  57 

Marquis  of  Lothian  64 

Earl  of  Somerset       -•      73 

Kirkpatrick         -  -  19 
of  Closcburn  19,  9i>- 


Lancaster,Earl  andDuke  of  7, 1 1 

12,93 

Landel  Lord  Landel       -         51 

Langres,  Bishop  and  Duke  of  38 


Leon         .            -           . 
King  of         -           86 

43 
,87 

Laon  Bishop  of       - 
Leicester,  Earl  of               18 

38 

.  59 

Lennox 

81 

Lendon,  Captain  Robert 

6q 

Lesly 

Earl  of  Rothes       - 

30 
44 

of  Balquhan 

of  Findrassie 

5 

"3 

Lidderdale,  Thomas 

10 

Liddel  of  Balbennie 

48 

Liddesdale 

82 

Linlithgow 

64 

Lindsay  Earl  of  Crawford  44,  49 

of  Kinnettles       -       50 

Little  of  Over-Libberton  57 

Livingston  of  Callender     -      34 

of  Calder        -       39 

E.  of  Linlithgow  51, 

57.64 
London  Bishoprick  -  40 
Long-cspee  E.  of  Salisbury  24 
Lorn  -  -  74,  83 

Lucy,  Lord         "  -         55 

Lusitania,  King  of         -         76 
Lunenburgh         -         -  102 

Lundin  of  that  Ilk  10,  12 

of  Auchtermemy         10 

of  Baldester       -  12 

Lundic  of  that  Ilk         -  24 

Lyon  Lord  Glammis,  Earl  of 

Strathmore         -        -         49 
Lyle  Lord  Lyie  -  52 


M. 

Macartney  of  Auchinleck         to 
M'Gilchrist  of  Northbar  ib. 

M'Dowall  of  Loni         -  83 

MaitlandE.  of  Lauderdale  63,  69 
Malcolm  Canmore  King  of 

Scothnd  -  88,  98 
II.  K.  of  Scotland    08 


Malta  Knights  thereof 
Manners  Ear!  of  Rutland 


INDEX  OF  SURNAMES,  Wc. 


ManiKi 


Page. 
3' 


Mary  Queen  of  Scotland  34,  35, 
73 

of  England        -        3S)  96 

Marr  Earl  of  Marr     19,  44,  45, 
52.  79 


March,  Earl  of 


Maule  Earl  of  Panmure  4, 9,  46, 
7<5,  79 

,  Lord,  in  France  46 

Abbot  of  Joinville         46 

Archdeacon  of  Lothian  4  8 


of  Balumbie 

of  Kelly 

of  Boath 

of  Melgum 

in  Sweden  and  Den- 
mark 

of  Guildie 

of  InncrpefTer 

of  Pitlivie  and   Ar- 

douny         ... 

of  Balmakelly 

of  Balumbie 

March,  Count  de  la 
Maxwell  Ear!  of  Niddcsdale 

of  Pollock 

of  Auldhouse 


Mcdicis  Duke  of  Tuscany  68 

Medici,  Peter          -          -  23 
Mentz,  Arch,  and   Elector 

of          -         -          -  38 

Mirandula,  Prince  of  60 

Michael,  St  John  of         -  78 

Modena,  Duke  of          .  60 

Moline,  Nicolas  de         -  66 

Montgomery  E.  of  Eglinton  57 

■ of  Lainshaw  52 

Monk  Duke  of  Albemarle  67 

Montrose          -           .  83 

Montague  Earl  of  Sandwich  15 
Monteith  of  Kerse      -      15,19 
■5 


of  Millhall 

— ,  Earl  of     ■ 

MoiTtealto,  William  de      -  48 

Mortimer  Earl  of  March  94 

,  Roger          -  78 

Mowbray  Duke  of  Norfolk  7 1 

Murray  Duke  of  Athol     -  So 

Earl  of  Annandale  70 

Viscountof  Stormontr  21 

Lord  Bothwell     45,  82 

of  Tullibardin      -  2 1 

Mowat          -          -          -  45 

Monmouth,  Duke  of        -  25 

Montacute  Earl  of  Salisbury  52 

Monthermer         -         -  ib. 

Mussini  Earl  of  Senlis       -  41 

Mennensi          -           .  03 


Nairn  of  Sandford 

of  Scgden 

of  Langside 


Page. 
Naiper         -         -         -  15 

of  that  Ilk  -  ib. 

Namur,  Marquis  of     -     29,  76 
Nassau  Prince   of  Orange    41, 

55.  105 
Navarre,  King  of  43,  86,  92 
Nevil,  Richard  .  52 

Northumberland,  Duke  of       25 
Norfolk,  Duke  of         -  71 


O. 

Ogilvie  of  that  Ilk 
Ogilvie  Lord  Ogilvie 
Ogilvie  Earl  of  Airly 
Ogilvie  of  Banff 
Ogilvie  of  Lintrathan 
Ogilvie  of  Aucherhouse     - 
Ogilvie  of  Innerquharity 
Ogilvie  of  Inchmartin 
Ogilvie  of  Findlater 
Ogilvie  of  Barras 
Ogilvie  of  Boyne 
Oliphant  Lord  Oliphant     - 
Oliphant  of  Cask 
Oliphant,  Writer 
Oldenburg,  Earl  of 
Orange 
Orange,  Prince  of      41,  55, 


Palatine,  Elector        -       2;, 

Parma,  Duke  of 

Parr,  Queen 

Parr  Marq.  of  Northampton 

Pepdie  of  Dunglass     -      21, 

Percy  Lord  Percy 

Percy  E.  of  Northumberland 

Peverel,  William 

Poissy,  Lord  of 

Poland,  King  of        -         67, 

Polwarth 

Portugal,  King  of      -       9,  i 

Preston  Lord  Dingwall 

Preston  of  Formartin 

Prussia,  King  of 


Ramsay         .         .         _ 
Ramsay  of  Auchterhouse 
Ramsay  of  Wyliecleugh 
Ramsay  of  Dalhousie 
Ramsay  Vise,  of  Haddington 
Ramsay  Earl  of  Holderness 


igrave, 


of 


Ranken  of  Orchard-head 
Randolph  Earl  of  Murray  6g, 
Roteslakie,  Baron  of 
Rheims,  Arch,  and  Duke  of 
Richmond,  Earl  of 


Page. 
Richard  I.  King  of  England  90 
Richard  II.  61 

Richardson  Lord  Cramond     70 
Roet         -  -  .         II 

Rocceilli,  Prince  of        -  23 

Roche,  Lord  of  -  26 

Rony,  Lord  of  -  46 

Ross  Earl  of  Ross      -      30,  81 
Ross  Lord  Ross  -  58 

Ross  of  Ballnall  and  Cars- 

creuch  -  -  36 

Ross  Bishoprick        -        39,  40 
Rutherford  of  that  Ilk  50 

Ruthven  Earl  of  Gowrio  70 


S. 

Salisbury,  Earl  of  -  24,  72 
Salisbury  Bishoprick  -  40 
Sancti  Marci,  Duke  of  23 

Sandilands  of  that  Ilk  -  71 
Sandilands  Lord  St  John  ib. 
Sandilands  Lord  Torphichen  ib. 
Sandilands  of  Calder  -  ib. 
Saxony  -  -  -  102 
Saxony,  Duke  of  -  22,  40 
Saxons  conquer  England  80 

Say,  Lord  -  -  72 

Savoy,  Duke  of  -  66,  84 
Scott  Duke  of  Buccleugh  5 

Scott  of  Bevelaw  -  ib. 

Scott  of  Sinton         -  10,  16 

Scott  of  Harden  -  ib. 

Scott  of  Thirleton         -  ib. 

Scott  of  Thirlstane  -  69 
Scott  of  Highchester  -  16 
Scott  of  Galashiels         -  10 

Scott  of  Wooll  -  -  16 
Schomberg,  Duke  of  -  14 
Scotland,  King  of  87,  97 

Scrymgeour  -  -  69 

Scrymgeour  Constable  of 

Dundee         -  -  48 

Segrave,  Lord  -  -  31 
Semple  Lord  Semple  -  58 
Seaton  LordSeaton  18,35,69,85 
Seaton  E.  of  Winton  57,  64,  69, 

99^ 
Seaton  Viscount  of  Kingston  64 
Seaton  of  Barns  -  1 8 

Seaton  of  Touch  -  50 

Seymour  Duke  of  Somerset  73 
Shaw  of  Sauchie  -  39 

Shaw  of  Bargarran  .  59 

Shaw  Abbot  of  Paisley  -  39 
Shovel,  Sir  Cloudsly  -  72 
Sicily,  King  of  60,  87,  104 

Sinclair  Lord  Sinclair  84,106 
Sinclair  Earl  of  Orkney  80,.  84 
Sinclair  of  Deskford  -  53 
Sinclair  of  Roslin         -  84 

Sinclair  of  Polwarth  -  2i 
Somerset,  Duke  of  3.4,  96 

Somerset,  Duke  of  Beaufort  12, 
26 


INDEX  OF  SURNAMES,  \s< 


Page. 


Somerset  Earl  of  Worcester 
Soulis,  Lord 

Spain,  King  of       9,  35,  84, 
Spar         -         .         - 
Spence  of  Wormiston 
Spigelberg,  Earl  of 
Spruel         ... 
Strathern         -         -         30, 
Strathern,  Earl  of 
Stanhope,  Sir  Edward 
Stephen  King  of  England 
Stewart         -  -  30, 

Stewart,  King  Robert 
Stewart  Earl  of  Murray     12, 
Stewart  D.  of  Richmond  12, 
Stewart  Duke  of  Berwick 
Stewart  Earl  of  Strathern 
Stewart  Earl  of  Buchan    45, 
66,  79, 
Stewart  Duke  of  Albany  45, 
Stewart  Earl  of  Traquair 
Stewart  Lord  Loni     50,  79, 
Stewart  E.  and  D.  of  Lennox 
and  Richmond        66,  79, 
Stewart  Earl  of  Athol        78, 
Stewart  E.  of  Caithness 
Stewart  E.  of  Angus 
Stewart  E.  of  Monteith 
Stewart  E.  of  March 
Stewart  E.  of  Marr 
Stewart  E.  of  Fife 
Stewart  Lord  Brechin 
Stewart  Lord  Darnly         81, 
Stewart  Lord  Doune 
Stewart  of  Appin 
Stewart  of  Bonkill 
Stewart  of  Innermeth 
Strachan  of  Carmylie 
Suabia       -         -       60,  87,  i 
Suffolk,  Duke  of 
Sussex,  Earl  of 
Surrey,  Duke  of 
Sutherland,  Earl  of 
Sutherland  of  Duffus 
Sutherland  of  Torboll 
Swinford,  Sir  Otes 
Sweden,  King  of 


84,85 


T. 

Torotte,  Lord 

Torquati 

Tour,  Count  de  la 

Treves,  Archbishop  of 

Turnbull  Bishop  of  Ross 


U. 

Uarbon,  Peter 
LTdney  of  that  Ilk 
Udney  of  Auchterallan 
Udney  of  Coultercallan 
Urre 
Vol.  II. 


Page. 


V. 


Valoins  Lord  Panmure 
Vendosnie 
Verinandois,  Count 
Vere  E.  of  Oxford  D.  of  he- 
land 
Vianden  -  -  i 

Villiers  D.  of  Buckingham 
Villeroy,  Duke  of 
Viles  of  Ferrara 
Venice         .         .         - 
Voisins,  Lord         -  46, 

Voyer  de  Poullny 


W. 

Wacken,  Baron  of 

Wallace  of  Ellerslie 

\\'al!ace  of  Craigie 

Walker 

WalJrum 

Waller  of  Gromebridge 

Warwick 

Warwick,  E.  and  D.  of     52 

Wemyss  E.  of  Wemyss 

Wemyss  of  Rires 

Wernegeroda,  Earl  of 

Widvill  Earl  of  Rivers 

William  the  Lion  K.  of  Scot 

land  -  -  84 

William  the  Conqueror  of 

England 
William  II.  of  England 
Winton 
Wishart 

Worcester  Earl  of      -       12 
Wood  of  Largo 
Wood  of  Balbegno 
Worcester,  Bishoprick     - 
Wosemale,  Baron  of 


Young,  Peter         .         .        66 
York,  D.of  7,  51,  52,85,94, 103 


Alphahetical  Index  of  the 
Figures  and  Terms  of 
Blazon,  Part  III. 


ABATEMENTS  of  honour  28 
Annulet  -  -  -  15 
Arms,  a  definition  of  them  i,  2 
Arms,  Lyon  King  of,  an  act 

in  his  favour  .  .  2 
Arms,  how  differenced  -  ib. 
Arms  composed  -  19 

Arms  of  bastards,  an  act  there- 

anent         -         -         -        24 


Arms,  how  to  compose  and 
marshall         -  -  29 

Arms  on  account  of  marriages 
and  othccs         -         -  32 

Arms,  how  women  ought  to 
carry  tlicm  -         -         33 

Arms  on  account  of  offices 
and  employment         -         37 

Arms  of  alliances  -  42 

Arms  of  adoption  and  substi- 
tution "  "  5? 

Arms,  with  an  act  hcreanent  54 

Arms  of  prescription,  custom, 
and  statute  of  certain  places  5  7 

Arms  of  patronage         -         58 

Arms  of  gratitude  and  affec- 
tion -         -  -Co 

Arms  of  religion  -  61 

Arms,  general  and  special  con- 
cessions of  arms  -         63 

Arms  feudal,  or  arms  of  dig- 


B. 

Badges  of  Britain,  France  and 

Ireland  -  -  100 

Bastardy  marks  thereof  24  to  28 
Bastard  bar  -  -         25 

Batton  ...         a 

Bishops'  arms  do  not  descend  62 
Bordure         -         -  9  to  13 


Cadency,  marks  thereof  i  to  29 

Cheveron           -            -  13 

Churchmen's  arms      -  20,  37 

Cross         -         -         -  100 


Dignities,  arms  of        -  74 

Dominion,  arms  of        -         80 


Ente  or  ingrafting  104,  106 

F. 

Fesse             -  -           105 

Feudal  arms  -              74 

Flower-de-luce  -            i  ir 


Genealogical  Pennon  107 

H. 
Heralds         -         -         -        42 


INDEX  OF  SURNAMES,  i^c 


Page. 


ingrafting 


Lambel  or  Label         6,  7, 
Lyon  King  at  Arms,  an  ac 
in  his  favour 


M. 


Marshalling 

Marshalling  by  coupe  and 

parti         -         -  -        107 

Minute  differences  -  14 


104 


Page. 
Partitions  for  marshalhng  of 

arms  -  -  104 

Parted  per  pale         -         -      20 
Pale         ...  ,05 

Pretension,  arms  of         -        84 


Quartering  arms         -       20, 42 

S. 

Sahier,  parted  per         -  104 

Seals,  of  ancient  ones  29,  .^o,  3 1, 

33.  34.  35.48,  5'.  75.  87.  89 

Seals  of  the  Kings  of  Engbnd  89 

to  98 

Seals  of  the  Kings  of  Scotland  98 

Seals  of  the  Kings  of  Britain  99, 

100 

Standards  of  Scotland  and 

England         -         -  loi 


Tiercing  -  -  106 

Tinctures,  anent  altering  them  3 ,4 
Tressure,  double         60,  6^,  98 


Union  arms  of  Scotland  and 
England         -  -  i 


Women,  their  honour       33,  72 


Tbe    Contents    of   the 
Chapters,  Part  III. 

CHAP.  L  of  additional  figures, 
or  marks  of  cadency  1 

Chap.  IL  of  composing  and 
marshalling  of  arms      -      29. 


INDEX  OF  THE  SURNAMES,  COUNTRIES,  FAMILIES   AND  PERSONS, 
WHOSE  ARMS  ARE  MENTIONED  IN  MR  NISBET'S  STSTEAL 
OF  HERALDRY,  PART  IF.  fr   '  't  fr8<' 


Page. 

ABBEY  of  Paisley  59 

Abbey  of  Holyrood- 
house  -  ib. 

Abercromby         -         -  21 

Abercromby  of  Glassoch  ib. 
Abercromby,  Lord  of  179^  187 
Achaius  K.  of  Scotd.  40, 1 05, 1 20 
Adrian  IV.,  Pope  -  60 

Ayton  of  that  Ilk  -  21 

Albert  Archduke  of  Austria  5  8 
Alexander  the  Great  -  10 
Alexander  King  of  Scotland  62 
Alexander  II.  12,  28,  31 

Alexander  III.  41,106 

Alexander  Earl  of  Stirling  22 
Alexander  of  Boghall  -  ib. 
Allan  of  Galloway,  Constable 

of  Scotland  -  ij 

Andrew,  Commendatorof  Jed- 
burgh        .         -         -       59 
Angus,  Earl  of         -  12,  45 

Anne  Queen  of  Britain  53 

Anne  Queen  -  -  109 
Anjou,  Duke  of  -  23 

Ancrum,  Earl  of  1 76,  1 84 

Apollo  -  -  53 

Archbishoprickof  St  Andrews  58 
Archbishop  of  St  Andrews  58,61 
Archbishop  of  Canterbury  61 
Argyle,  Duke  of  20,  6^ 

Armenia,  King  of         -     .     23 


Arbuthnot  Viscount  of  Ar- 

buthnot          -           -  21 

Arbuthnot  of  Fiddes  ib. 

Arbuthnot  of  Findowrie  ib. 
Athol,  Earl  of          -         33,  46 

Austria,  Archduke  of       -  39 

Aurelian  the  Emperor       -  37 

Aventinus           -           -  10 


Bavaria,  Duke  of 

Baliol,  John,  K.  of  Scotland 


';4 

Balfour  of  that  Ilk 

18 

Bahraves  of  Carnbody 

22 

Barclay  of  Towie 

32 

Basa 

■iO 

Bannerman  of  Elsick       - 

«3 

Bargeny,  Lord  of 

'79 

Reatson  of  Kilrie 

21 

Beaufort  D.  of  Somerset 

37 

Beaufort,  Henry 

W 

Beauchamp  of  Kiddermmster 

49. 

Bethune  of  Balfour 

18 

Beaton,  Cardinal 

3'; 

Bourbon  in  France             20 

23 

,  Duke  of               24 

.25 

Page. 
Borthwick  Lord  Borthwick     35 

,  Lord  of       -         177 

Bohemia,  King  of         -  39 

Bonkill  -  -  -  21 
Brandenburg,  Duke  of  -  3 
Brissonius,  President  of  the 


Parliament  of  Paris 

6n 

Brunswick,  Duke  of            3 

IQ 

Bruce  Earl  of  Elgin           19 

33 

of  Skelton 

IQ 

of  Airtli 

33 

ib. 

,  King  Robert       - 

TOf) 

Burgh  Earl  of  Ulster 

2(5 

Buckingham,  Edward  Bagot 

Duke  of 

66 

Burgundy,  D.  of     7,  24,  25 

31 

Burnet         -         -          - 

66 

Cad  wallader  K.  of  England  26, 3  6 
Catti         ...         21 


Castile  and  Leon,  King  of 
Cathcart  Lord  Cathcart 
Carnegie  Earl  of  Southesk 
Earl  of  Northesk 


Campi  in  Placenza         -         21 
Calder  of  Liniger  -  21 

Carey  Viscount  of  Falkland    33 


INBLX  OF  SURNAMES,  l3\ 


Cnmpbell  Duke  (if  Argyle  _^4 
Carmichael  E.irl  of  Hyndford  ib. 
Cannse,  battle  of  -  54 

Cardinals'  Habit  -  57 

Cardinal  Ricblieii      -        ;S,  60 
CamillcdeNcuvilledoVillc- 
roy  Arclibishop   and  Earl 
of  Lyons  -  -         5S 

Canterbury,  Archbishop  of  Oi 
Cameron,.  John,  Bishop  of 

Glasgow         -  -         5S 

Cardinal  W-azarine  -         60 

Carron,  Sir  Alexander  84 

Cardross,  Lord  of         -  178 

Cecil,  William,  L.  Burleigh  53 
Chancellors  of  France  -  19 
Charles  VI.  K.  of  France  35,  36 

VII.  42 

II.  K.  of  Britain  42,  43 

I.  6s,  67 


60 

Chester,  Earl  of 

46 

Childeric  King  of  France 

146 

Christians          - 

II 

Clanchatton 

23 

Clare  Earl  of  Gloucester 

26 

Clarence,  Duke  of      -      38 

44 

Clara  Eugenia  Infanta  of  Spain  5  8 

Cockburn  of  that  Ilk       - 

19 

Colonni        -         -         - 

II 

Colouna 

•9 

Constantine, Emperor  24,3  7, 

122 

60 

Conqueror  of  Frierton      - 

21 

Combauld,  Lewis  of       - 

137 

Comte  de  Cosse 

65. 

Corvinus,  Marcus 

10 

Cornwall,  E.  and  D.  of     44 

,46 

Cranston  of  that  Ilk 

3" 

Craniond,  Lord  of         178, 

187 

Crawfurd 

22 

„e  1 — ,1 — i,:n 

ib. 

of  Filbimic 

ib. 

,  Archibald,  Abbot 

of  Holyroodhouse 

59 

Craw  of  Heugh-head 

>9 

Crichton  Earl  of  Dumfries 

33 

Cromwell,  Oliver 

60 

Cunningham  E.  of  Glencairn  18, 

Cumin,  John 

il 

Earl  of  Buchan 

^i 

Cuming  Constable  of  Scotland  6<> 

Cupar,  Lord  of      -        178, 

186 

Cyprus,  King  of 

41 

Cyrus's  Grave 

146 

Dalmahoy  of  that  Ilk  32,  65 
Dalziel  of  Carnwath  18,139 
Dauphin  of  France         -         41 

of  Vienne        -         42 

David  I.  K.  of  Scotland  1 2 

Denmark,  K.  of  -  79 


Page. 
Denia  town  and  castle  thcre- 

•of  in  Spain        -         -         53 

Deskford,  Lord  of         177,  L85 

Douglas  E.  and  D.  of  1  2,  23,  3  i, 

33.  3».  '33 

,  Sir  James         -  1  2 

of  Rcilliousc       -       32 

Earl  of  Marr       -       1 2 

Earl  of  March  34 

Earl  of  Morton     -      33 

Dukeof  Oueensberry  34 

of  Cavers         -  2 1 

,  Archibald  E.  of  56,  108 

Drummond  E.  of  Perth  25,  33, 
38.  134 

Lord  Madcrty  33 

of  Hnthornden  2 1 

of  Blair  -  ib. 

of  Innermay       -        ib. 

Dunbar,  Earl  of  14,  19,  31 

of  Wcstfield       -       32 

Dundas  of  that  Ilk  20,  25,  32,  34 
Duirbar,  Earl  of  -  67 

Dumbarton,  Earl  of  176,  184 
Durham,  Bishop  of  -  46 
Duplin,  Viscount  of      177,  1 86 


Edgar  of  Wadderly        -         32 
Edinburgh         -  -  73 

a  tournament  tlicre  28 

Edward  Ironside  K.  of  Engd.  39 
III.  and  IV.  K.  of  Eng- 
land     13,  24,  26,  34,  36,  44 

III.  King  of  England  55 

VI.  ib. 

,  Prince  -  ib. 

V.  &  VI.  Kings  of 

England  -  36,  40 

Egebert  K.  of  England  39 

Elphinston  Lord  Balmerino     21 

Lord  Elphinston     33 

of  Craighousc  22 

Ely,  Bishop  of  -  -       46 

Emperor's  Crest  -  )6 


and  cry  of  war  24 

England,  Kings  of,  their  crest  16 

their  device       -        25 

tlieir  cry  of  war        23 

their  supporters         35 

their  crown  39 

Evrol,  Earl  of  -  67,  63 

Erskine  Earl  of  Marr  34 

Earl  of  Kelly        30,  47 

Viscount  of  Fenton  47 

,  Sir  Alexander  of 

Cambo  -  -  66 

Eymouth,  Lord  of         179,  188 


Fabius  Maximus  -  54 

Farquharson  of  Invercauld      32 


Felix  in  Piedmont        '- 

2J 

Fergus  I.  King  of  Scotland 

40 

Fierlundtz,  Simon  de 

4 

Fiery  cross 

24 

Fife,  Malcolm  Far!  of 

67 

Findl.iter,  Favl  of 

1  -■- 

Fisher 

42 

Flanders,  Earl  of    7,  14,  24 

31 

Fothcringham  of  Powric  30,  32 

Forbes  Lord  Forbes 

34 

Forrester 

22 

Lord  Forrester 

16 

Forfar,  Earl  of       -       176, 

84, 

France,  Kings  of,  their  crest 

16 

23 

their  device           24 

»35 

ti.eir  crown 

3'> 

Francis  I.  King  cf  France 

^> 

Frazer,  William,  Archbishop 

of  St  Andrews 

ss 

Frederick  I.  Emperor 

60 

III.  Emperor 

24 

Fullarton  of  tliat  Ilk 

32 

Garter,  the  Order  the 


Gaunt,  John  of 
George  King  of  Britain      1 1, 
German  Emperors  crown 
Gloucester,  Duke  of 
Glasgow,  Bishoprick  thereof 
Glassford,  Lord  of        180,  i 
Gordon  of  that  Ilk 

,  Duke  of 

Graham  Earl  of  Monteith 

of  Nctherncss 

Grant         .         -  - 

of  that  Ilk 

Grand  Signior 

Gray  Lord  Gray        -       21, 
Greeks         -         .  - 

Grimaldi  Prince  of  INIonaco 
Guise,  Duke  of 


I-l. 

Haddington,  Earl  of 

I  Inig  of  Bemerside 

Halyburton  of  Pitcu 

Hamilton,  Duke  of 

Hannibal 

Ilainault,  Count 

Hay  Earl  of  Errol 

Hay  Constable  of  Scotland 

Henry  IL  King  of  France 

III.  K.  of  England 

VL 

VII.  25,  26,  28: 

VIII.          26,36,40, 

56. 


3°. 


INDEX  OF  SURNAMES,  b\ 


Page. 
Ilenvy  IV.  V.  VI.  VII.  and  VIII. 
Kings  of  England  -  36 
Hercules  -  -  -  10 
Henies,  Lord  -  -  33 
Holyroodhouse  Abbey  11,  3  i 
Homager  Kings  -  54 

Home  E.  of  Home     16,  18,  23, 

Earl  of  Marchmont      33 

of  Wedderburn  1 8, 20, 3  2 

Hotman  -  -  24 
Howard  Duke  of  Norfolk  1  7 
Earl  of  Surrey     -     ib. 


J.imes  I.  K.  of  Scotland  25,  51, 
64,  65 
30,40,42,68 

40,59 

28,  33,40 

56,  64,  107,  1 10 


II. 

III. 

IV. 

V. 

VI. 

VII.  111,36,65 

Jardine  of  Applegirth  19 

Jedburgh,  Lord  of         178,  186 
24 


John  King  of  England 
Johnston  M.  of  Annandale     1 9, 

22,  34 

lolus         -         -  -          54 

Jove             -  -             ib. 

Julius  Caesar         -  -          10 

Jupiter  Animon  -              ib. 

Innes  of  that  Ilk  -      20,  32 

Irvine  of  Drum  -         30,32 


Keith  Earl  Marischall  16 

Earl  of  Kintore  34 

Kenmure,  Viscount  of  33 

Ker  E.  and  M.  of  Lothian  16,  35 

Earl  of  Roxburgh       ib.  33 

Kirkpatrick  of  Closeburn  18,  32 
Kinnaird,  Lord  -  33 

Kinderton,  Baron  of         -51 
ICinnoul,  Earl  of  177,  186 

Kirkcudbright,  Lord  of  1 79, 1 87 


Lancaster,  E.  and  D.  of 
25,  26,44, 
Lauderdale,  E.  and  D.  ot 
Lauder  of  Fountainhall 
Leicester  Trotius 
Lennox,  Duke  of 
Leslie  E.irl  of  Ross 

Earl  of  Leven 

Earl  of  Rothes 

— ,  Alexander 


7.  15. 

46,  55 

18,139 

22 

60 

24,63 

31 

34 

ib. 


Page. 
Lyons,  Arch,  and  E.  thereof  58 
Livingston  E.  of  Linlithgow    16 

Viscount  of  Teviot  34 

Lockhart,  Sir  William  60 


Macfarlane  of  that  Ilk  1 34 

Mackenzie         -  -  23 

M.  of  Seaforth  21,33 

Earl  of  Cromarty  ib. 

M'DuffEarlof  Fife         -         7 


M'Dowall  Baron  of  Lodvica 
M'Kay  Lord  Rae  21,  34 

W'lntosh  of  that  Ilk  2 1 

M'Pherson         -  -  ib. 

Maderty,  Lord  of         -  178 

Maleanus,  Lodovick  3 1 

Malcolm  M'Kenneth  King      50 
Malcolm  II.  K.  of  Scotland    61 
Malcolm  Canmore  K.  of  Scot- 
land -  61,  64,  67 

IL  and  III.  Kings 

of  Scotland  -  45 

March,  Earl  of  1 4, 1 9,  26,  3 1 ,  3  8 
Man-  Earl  of  Marr  12,31 

Martyr  -  -  -  24 

Mars         -         -  -  10 

Mary  Queen  of  England  26,  36 
Maud  Queen  of  England  39 
Maule  Earl  of  Panmure  34 

Maxwell  Lord  Maxwell  22 

of  Pollock         -        32 

Maximilian  II.  Emperor  ctf 


Germany 
Mazarine,  Cardinal 


Melville,  Earl  of     16,  176,  184 
Milan,  Duke  of  -  23 

Minerva  -  -  10 

Moodie,  Captain  J 
Monteith,  John  Ci 
of 

,  Earl  of 

Montrose,  Earl  of 


g,  E. 
-         65 
176,  184 
67 

Montmorency,  Lord  of     24,  35 
Moncrief  of  that  Ilk  30,  32 

Montgomery,  Earl  of        -        5 

Earl  of  Eglinton  34 

of  Lainshiw       ^  2 

Monypenny  of  Pitmilly  42 

Mortimer,  Roger  -  26 

Morville  Constableof  Scotland  6g 
Moses         -         -         -  55 

Mowbray  Earl  of  Nottingham  15 

Earl  Marshall  ib. 

D.  of  Norfolk 


'5-17 

25,  30 

Mowat  of  Easter-Foulis  3 1 

Murray,  Randolph  Earl  of      14 

Earl  of  Annandale      34 

Earl  of  Tuilibardin     ib. 

Viscountof  Stormont  ib. 

of  Touchadam  3  2 

of  Polmaise  ib. 


Page. 
Murray,  Andrew,  Governor 

of  Scotland         -         -       65 
My-pont  in  Burgundy  21 


34 


N. 

Naples 

Naves         -          -  -         22 

Nevers         -         -  -         20 

Newark,  Lord  of  179,  188 

Nisbet  of  Dean  -             32 


77 


Ochiltree,  Lord  of 
Ogilvie 

of  Barras         -  22 

Earl  of  Find  later  33 

of  Innerquharity  134 

Oliphant  Lord  Oliphant  34 

Olympus,  Mount           -  54 
Oxenford,  Viscount  of  177,  186 


Palatine  of  the  Rhine 
Patriarch,  Roman  56, 

Perth,  Earl  of         -  25, 

Philip  II.  King  of  Spain 
Phocas  Emperor  of  Rome 
Pitcur,  Laird  of 
Poland,  King  of 
Pollock  of  that  Ilk 
Pope's  arms 
Pope  of  Rome 

Julius  II. 

Innocent  IV. 

Adrian  IV. 

Sixtus  Quintus  i 

John         -  -  ( 

Preston  of  Craigmiller       1 8, ; 
Proteus         -        -         -  1 

Protest  taken  by  William  Wil- 
son upon  delivering  up  the 
Regalia  -  -  ^ 


Quincy  Earl  of  Winchester     15 


Randolph  Earl  of  Murray  14,  3 1 
Ramsay  Viscount  of  Hadding- 
ton, Earl  of  Holderness  18,  22, 
33>47 
Richard  I.  King  of  England    :2 

II.  and  III.      26,  36,  40 

II.  King  of  England, 

the  first  that  erected  a  ba- 
ron by  patent  49,  50 


INDEX  OF  SURNAMES,  "dc. 


Page. 
Richlieu,  Cardinal  58,  60 

Ribcauniont,  Eustache  dc  49 
Robert  Bruce  K.  of  Scotland  14, 
40,  j8,  65,  68,  io6 
Robertson  of  Stnian  135 

Robert  II.  and  III.  Kings  of 

Scotland  31,33,42,108 

Rochhead  of  Craigleith  and 

Innerleith         ■  -  J  9 

Roderico  Fernando  Bishop  of 

Jaen  -  -  59 

RollandjConstabkof  Scotland  14 
Romans  -  -  53 

Roman  Emperors' Apotheosis  54 
Roman  Patriarch  -  60 

Roman  Diadem  -  37 

Romans,  King  of  7,  39 

Ross  L.  and  E.  of  Ross  19,  31 
Rothes,  Earl  of  -  22 

his  funeral         -       147 

Ruglen,  Earl  of  176,185 

Ruthven  Earl  of  Gowrie  34 
Rutherford,  Lord  o£     179,187 


Sardinia,  King  of         -  41 

Savoy,  Duke  of  25,  41 

Saxony,  Duke  of  -  8 

Shaw,  Geo.,  Abbot  of  Paisley  59 

of  Sauchie  59,  81 

Scotland,  Kings  of,  their  crest  16 

,  arms  of         -  141 

cry  of  war        -        23 

device  -  24 

supporters  34 

crown  -  39 

18,  80 

19,  22 
12,  22 


Scott  of  Thirlestane 

D.  of  Buccleugh 

Scrymgeour  of  Dudop 
ScrymgeourConstableof  Dun- 
dee        -         -  -         83 
Seafield,  Earl  of             177,185 
Seaforth,  Marquis  of  21 
Seaton          -          -          15,110 

Earl  of  Winton     15,23, 

32,  38,  46 

E.  of  Dunfermline  16,  34 

of  Touch  -  1 9 

Segnies  Chancellor  of  France  62 
Seignior,  Grand  -  54 

Selkirk,  Earl  of  176,185 

Sinclair         -         -         -         14 

of  Herdmanston         ib. 

Skene  of  that  Ilk  -  32 

Solway,  Eari  of  -  185 

Somerset,  Earl  and  Duke  of    25 
Somervel  Lord  Somervel  18,  32 

of  Cambusnethan      3 1 

Southesk,  Earl  of  6^,  8 1 

Soulis,  Lord         -         -  65 

Spain,  King  of         -         33,  39 
Spynie,  Lord  of  -  178 

St  Andrews,  Archbishop  of  5  8,6 1 
Stewarts,  family  of         -         64 

Vol..  u. 


Steward  of  Scotland 
Stewart         -         -         - 

Earl  of  Carrick 

Earl  of  Lennox 

Earl  of  Athol 

Earl  of  Buchan     1 7 

E.of  Galloway  17,21 

Earl  of  Fife  and  D. 

of  Albany       -         17,44 

Earl  of  Murray     1 7 

Lord  Ochiltree 

Earl  of  Traqualr 

of  Phisgall 

Lord  Kyle 

Lord  Blantyre 

Duke  of  Rotlisay 

Strathern,  Earl  of  31, 


Page. 
65 


de  46 


Strachan,  Comes  Palat 
Str.ithmore,  Earl  of        -  18 

Sturton  Lord  Sturton  19 

Sutherland,  Earl  of     12,21,33 
Sweden,  King  of  38,  39 


T. 

Tercys,  Arch,  of  Tarragon     23 
Thcbans  -  -  54 

Teviot,  Viscount  of      177,  186 
Thoulouse,  Counts  of  19 

Tristan  de  Saladzes  Arch- 
bishop of  Sens  -  59 
Tuscany,  Duke  of          -         41 
Touraine,  Archibald  Duke  of  56 
Tweeddale,  Marquis  of  20 


Ulster,  Earl  of 
Ursini  in  Italy 


26,  38 
19.34 


Valois,  Duke  of  -  43 
Vandeput  -  ■  -  42 
Venice,  Doge  of  -  41 
Vere  Marquis  of  Dublin  45 
Earl  of  Oxford  2 1 


Wallace,  Sir  WiUiain  12 

Wales,  Prince  of  13,  42 

Watson  of  Sauchton  22 

Wemyss  Earl  of  Wemyss        16 
William  King  of  Scotland        14 

the  Conqueror    39,  50 

II.  King  of  England  39 

Wimbry  Lord  Talboys  5  i 

Winchester,  Earl  of       -  15 

Winton,  Earl  of  65,  139 

Wood  of  Craigie  -  32 


Page. 
Widvillc  Earl  Rivers  37,40 
Wood,  Andrew,  of  L.irgo       77 


Y. 


York,  Duke  of  25,  42 


Zingi  Emperor  -  1 1 


Index  of  the  Figures  and 
Terms  of  Blazon  in  Mr 
Nisbet's  System  of  He- 
raldry, Part  IV. 


ABBOTS        -  -  58 

Abbesses         -         -         -      59 
Abatements  of  honour  128 

Acorns         -         .         .         54 
Admiral  of  France         -  58 

of  England  76,  78 

of  Scotland  78 

badge  of  the  office     78 

Affronte         -         -  58,66 

Almoner  -  -  66 

Anchors  -  -  58 

Angels  -  57,  58,  59 

St  Andrew         -  -  58 

St  Andrew's  cross         -  66 

Archbishops         -         -  58 

Adantides  -  -  27 

Achievement  royal  of  France 

under  a  pavilion         140,141 
Achievement  of  Scotland       141 


Baron         ...  48 

spiritual  and  temporal, 

by  tenure,by  writ, by  patent  49 
to  53 

manner  of  erecting  one 

by  patent  50,  52,  53 

his  robes,  title,  privi- 

lege,  and  coronet  50,  53 

eldest  son  has  no  par- 
ticular title  -  ib. 

called  tilulati  in  Na- 
ples and  Lombardy  49 

majores  and  minores  49, 

5°.  5'.  61 

of  the  cinque  ports 

and  exchequer  -  51 

coronetjsignaturethere- 

anent  -  -  51 

Banner  of  the  church  57 

Badge  of  office  57,  58,  62,  63, 
64,  65,66,78 


INDEX  OF  SURNAMES,  l^c. 


Page. 
Batton  -  64,  65,  66 

Buttelarius         -  -  65 

Banners  -  80,  81 

Badges  -  -  -  11 

of  dignified  offices  in 

the  empire         -         -  80 
of  cup-bearer  in  Scot- 
land        ...          81 

of  knighthood     8j,  92, 

loi,  103 
of  the  usher  to  the  or- 
der of  the  thistle  up 

of  knights  bannerets  122 

of  knights  baronets  123 

124.  125 

of  the  order  of  the 

crescent         -  -         130 

of  the  knights  of 

Malta  -  -  131 

of  the  knights  d'Avis  132 

Baptism  of  Prince  Henry      1 51 
Black  hangings  -  146 

Bonnet         .         -         -         jj 
Buttoned         -         -       -        62 


Cartouches 
Casque 
Canting  arms 
Cap,  baron's 
Cap  of  State 
Cap,  ducal 
Cartouch  oval 
Cardinal's  hat 

cloa^hing 


26 

47.56 

55 

ib. 

56 

57.59 

ib. 


creation  and  prece- 
dency -  57,  59,  60 
Cavalcades         -  -  150 

Capelines  .  .  7 

Chnplet  of  pearls  49,  5 1 

Chapeau         -  -         55,  ^6 

Cheveron  •  -  j8 

Churchmen's  precedency        169 


Chaplet  of  flowers 

- 

59 

Chanters 

- 

lb. 

Cherubims 

ib. 

Chancellor  of  Britain   and 

Scotland 

_ 

61 

-; his  oflice, 

pnvi- 

leges,  and  precedency   61,  62 

^ of  France  62 

his  cap,  crest,  and 

mantle  -  -  ib. 

Chamberlain  of  France  ib. 

of  England  ib. 

his  office, power 

and  privileges  -  ib. 

' of  Scot.,lusotfice  63 

fees  and  prece- 
dency -  62,  ^4 
Chief  Justice  of  England  63 
Cinque  ports,  barons  of  5 1 
Clareiicieux  -  -  5^ 
.    ■',-■,  kijig  at  arms       165 


Couche  shields 

Contourne 

Cottises         ... 

Coronet,  viscount's 

Coronet,  baron's 

Count  palatines 

Coronet,  baron's,  king's  sig- 
nature thcreanent 

Coronets  of  the  nobility,  the 
circles  all  of  one  form 

Coronet  of  a  lord  in  France 

Corona  muralis,  castrensis, 
navalis,  triumphalis,  ova- 
lis,  obsidialis,  civica,oliva- 
lis,  populea 

Cordelier  -  -  1 

Compartment 


their  orig'mal   135 

140 


Comble 

Coronation  of  the  kings  of 
Scotland 


'5° 


Commonwealths,  their  pre- 
cedency -  -  169 
Cord  knotted  of  abbots  59 
Composition  -  -  60 
Commanders  of  religious  or- 
ders -  -  .  ib. 
Cordeliere          -           -  ib. 


Court  of  king's  bench 


63 


exchequer  in  Scotland 

and  England  -  64 

Constable,  Lord  High  66 

Comes  Stabuli  -  ib. 

Constable's  report  anent  his 

privileges         -  -  6c) 

badge  of  his  office 

in  England        -  -         69 

in  Scotland  ib. 

in  France  ib. 

Crosier         -  -  5S,  59 

Crown  of  thorns  -  59 

Crest  of  cimier  3,  10  to  21 

Cries  of  war         -  -         23 

Crowns  and  coronets  37  to  48 
Crown  of  Scotland  -  40 
Creation  of  Viscounts  47 

of  Barons     49,  jo,  52 

Crowns,  their  origin  from  the 

Romans         -  -  53 

Crest  -  -  53,55 

Crown  open  or  antique  54 

,  Turkish  -  ib. 

of  Doge  of  Venice       ib. 

Crest  of  England  -  55 

Crown,  papal  -  -  56 
Cross-staff  -  58,  66 

Creation  of  the  Marquisses 

of  Hamilton  and  Huntly    162 
Crown,  the  Lyon  King  at 

Arms  -  -  166 

Curtains  -  -  140 


Deans 

Diadems 
Diademate 
Disposed  in  saltier 
Dukes 

their  creation 

their  1 

Dux  or  Duke 
Dukes 


Page. 
59 

37 

ib. 

6s,  66 

44 
ib. 
-  45 
55 
60 


Earl  -         -  45>46 

Ecclesiastics  inferior  59 

Elder  sons  of  nobility,  their 

titles  -  -  47 

Emperors,  their  precedency  168 
Ensigned  -  64, 65 

Erection  of  a  baron  by  pa- 
tent 48,49,50,51,52 
Ermine  -  51,  56,  62 
Escutcheon                -  142 

women's  145 

Exterior  ornaments  i,  2 
Exchequer,  Barons  of  5I)  64 
,  Court  thereof,  in 


Scotland  and  England  64 


Familiar  counsellor         -         64. 
Feuilles         -         -         -  7 

Fiery  cross         -  -  23 

Fiery  chapel  -  146 

Forester,  the  King's,  in  Scab 

land     .        -  -66 

Fretted  -  -  62 

Funeral  belt  r  146 


G. 

Garlands  of  laurel         -  37 

Garter,  King  at  Arms      48,  5 1 
53.  165 
Garland  "  "  53 

Gentility,  its  rise  and  perfec- 
tion        -         -  122,  142 
Grass         -          -  -         54 
Green  hat         -           -  58 


H. 

Hachemcnts  -  7 

Hat  -  -  55 

~. —  red  one  of  the  cardi- 
nals -  -  57,  58 

green  of  Archbishops 

and  Bishops  -  58 

black  of  abbots         -        59 

of  piothonotaries  ib. 

Helmets  -  3,  4,  5,  6,  8 

Helmet        -         -         53,  SS 


INDEX  OF  SURNAMES,  b-c. 


r. 

Heralds,  their  rise,  privileges, 

&c. 

society  in  England 

in  Scotland 

Hiked 
Highlander 
Hood  Viscount's 

Baron's         -         -, 

Horns         .         .  - 

Holy  Ghost,  order  thereof 
Hooked  heads 
Household,  master  of,  in  Scot 

land         -         r         - 

in  England 

Hounds,  grey 
Hunting  horns 


I. 

Imperial  crown  -  38 
Images  carried  at  funerals  147 
Jove  -  -  54 
Joustlngs  -  -  2,  28 
Justice-General  of  Scotland  63 
his  jurisdiction 

and  court         -  -         64 

~- ■-  of  Argyle,and 

the  Isles         -  -  ib. 


Keys  -  -  57,63 

Keeper  of  the  Great  Seal  61 
King's  thane         -         -  49 

King  at  Arms,  Garter,  48,  51,  53 
King's  Bench  -  -  63 
Kirtle  .  .  -  137 
Kings,  their  precedency  168 

Knotted  cord  "  -  59 
Knight  Marischal  in  Scotland  73 
Krighthood         -  -  82 

Knights,  Roman  -  83 

•^ Christian  -  82 

MonozOiis  -        S3 

Baccalaurei        -  ib. 

Baiini-rcts  -  ib. 

of  St  Michael  85 

of  the  Holy  Ghost      86 

of  the  Golden  Fleece  88 

of  the  Round  Table  90 

of  the  Garter  ib. 

of  the  Bach  102 

of  the  Thistle  104 

Baronets  in  England  103 

Bannerets  in  Scot<i.   122 


Knights  of  Malta 
in  Scotland 


Page. 

'3' 
132 
ib. 


Lambrequins         -  -  7 

Largess         -  -         48,  53 

Laurel  -  -  -  53 

Label  of  three  points  55 

I^aqs  d'Amour  -  130 

Legates         -  -         58,  60 

Legend         -    »    .         -         58 
Letter  of  Q.  Caroline,  anent 
precedency  of  the  Lords  of 
Session  and  Barons  of  Ex- 
chequer        -  -  171 
List  of  the  Peers  of  Scotland  1 83 
Limitations  of  succession  in 

patents         -  -  184 

Lords  of  Session,  dieir  re- 
turn anent  the  Peerage  of 
Scotland         -         -  173 

Lozenge  shield  -  59 

Lion  passant  gardant  55 

Lyon  King  at  Arms  51,  66,  166 


Baronets  in  Scotland 

Batchelors  in  Scotd.  : 

service 

their  degradation 


of  the  Holy  Sepul- 

ch)o         -         .        . 

■ of  the  crescent  or 

half-moon 


6,  7,  8 

7.  '36.  '3S 

45 

-        48 

49 

59, 60, 62 

60 

lb. 

69 


M. 


Mantling 
Manteaux 
Marquis'  coronet 
Mantle,  Viscount's 

,  Baron's 

Mace 

Marquisses 

Master  of  the  Household 

in  England 

of  Horse  in  Franc 

his  badge  of  office 
Marischal  of  Scotland       66,  72 

of  England  69 

badge  of  their  office  75 

Mantle         -  -  6,  137 

Merchant-taylors  in  London  140 
Myrtle         -         -         -  54 

Mitre  -  -  58,  60 

Miniver         -  -         47,  49 

Mottos  -  2,  20  to  24 

Mont-Joye         -  -  23 

N. 

Nobility,  their  eldest  sons'  ti- 
tles ...  ^y 

proofs  thereof         142 

heir  precedency     170 


Norroy  King  at  Arms 
Nowed 


Oaken  leaves         -         .         j^ 
Oathof  the  kingtothe  estate.",  164 


Page. 
Oaths  of  prelates  and  barons 

to  the  king  -  164 

Oaths  of  the  Lyon  King  at 

arms  and  heralds  167 

Office,  badges  of  ;8,  62,  63 
Olhcers  of  State,  tlieir  prece- 
dency -  -  170 
Olive  leaves  -  -  54 
Ombel  -  -  -  142 
Order  of  th(5  Holy  Ghost         58 

of  the  Garter  90 

of  the  Thistle,  antiqui- 
ty and  original   thereof   104, 
1 19,  121 
Oval  cartouch         -         -        56 


Palatines,  Count         -  50 

Palisades  "  "  53 

Pale,erected  in,  58,59,62,63,65 
Palm  branches  -  59 

Pastoral  staff         -  -         59 

Panctarius  -  64,  65 

Paneter  of  France         -  6j 

Patent  for  recovering  tlie  Or- 
der of  the  Thistle  1 1 1 
Pavilion                  136,  140,  141 
Pearls  of  a  Baron's  coronet        47 

of  a  Viscount's  5 1 

chaplets  of  -  49 

Peerage  of  Scotland,  Lords  of 

Sesiion'sreturn  thereanent  1 73 
Peers  of  Scotland  forfeited  1 74 
,  roll  of        -         175>>83 


Pendant 

58,62 

Petit  Oris 

62 

Pilgrim's  bourdon 

59 

Pope's  bull 

-           56 

shield 

lb. 

crown 

57 

keys         . 

ib. 

supporters 

ib. 

Pommelled 

64 

Portcullis  pursuivant 

25 

Powdered 

64,65 

Precedency 

168 

Prxfectus  Prxtorii 

-        64 

President  of  tlie  Parliament 

in  France 

62 

by  cap  and  m 

.ntle     ib. 

Priors  and  provosts 

59 

Primates 

58 

Privileges  of  Viscoiuit 

48 

Processions 

150 

Professors  of  sciences. 

their 

precedency 

172 

Proiile 

-         58 

Prothonotaries 

59,60 

Purse,  Chancellor's 

62 

R. 

Radiant  crown 

37 

Rebuses 

-       i/i 

INDEX  OF  SURNAMES,  ^c. 


•      ■  Page. 

Red  hat        -         -        57>  5^ 
Regne  or  triple  crown  57 

Regalia  of  Scotland  1 89 

Return  of  the  Lords  of  Ses- 
sion ancnt  t\e  Peerage  of 
Scotland         -  -  173 

Riding  tlie  Scots  Parliament  161 
Rings         -         -  -         i8 

Robes  of  a  Viscount  48 

of  a  Baron       49,  50,  52 

Rochet  -  57 

Roll  of  the  Peers  of  Scot- 
land        -         -         175,  183 
Romans,  origin  of  crowns  in 

arms  from  them         -  53 

Royal  Order  of  France  58 

crowns  -  39 

Rouge  dragon  pursuivant        26 


Salmon  .  .  j8 
Saltier-ways  57,  58,  62,  63,  64 
65,  66,  67 
Scots  Cowl         -          -  55 
Seals               12,  to  18,  30  to  33 
of  the  Kings  of  Eng- 
land             -             -  SS 
Archibald  E.  of  Doug- 
las        -         -           -  56 

John  Duke  of  Albany    56 

of  the  Order  of  Knight- 
hood        -         86,  88,  89,  96 
S6 


Seal  of  the  Pope 
■ Archbishop  of  St   An- 
drews -  -  58 

Bishop  of  Glasgow  ib. 

James  Lord- Hamilton       79 

of  Andrew  Commenda- 

tor  of  Jedburgh  59 

Senescallus         -         -  65 

Seme         .        -          -  66 

Shield,  of  the         -         -  J 

Signature  ancnt  a  Baron's  co- 

Slughorns  -  -  23 

Spiritual  Barons  49,  50,  51 

Staff  57,  58,  59,  60,  62,  64,  65 
Standish  -  -  65 

Statutes  of  the  Order  of  the 

Thistle         -  112,220 

Sterns  of  ships  or  gallies  53 

Supporters  -  12,27 

Supporters,  the  Pope's  57 


Page. 
Suppressed         -  -  64 

Surcoat,  Viscount's         -         48 

Sword  -  -  64 

Symbola  administrationis         61 


Tassels  -  58,59,60,61 
Tasselled  -  -  62 

Telamones         -  -  27 

Temporal  Barons  48  to  53 

Tenents  -  -  -  27 
Thane         -  -  48,  49 

Thane,  King's  -  ib. 

Thistles  -  64,  65,  66 

Thimbrum  or  tymbrum  10 

Tiara  papalis  -  -  56 
Timbre  -  2,  3,  4,  1 1 

Titles  of  the  elder  sons  of  the 

nobiUty  only  by  courtesy  47 
Barons'  eldest  son  has  no 

particular  one  -  ib. 

of  a  Viscount         -        ib. 

Title  of  Baron  is  general  to 

all  Lords  of  Parliament  49 
Titulati  Barons,  called  so  in 

Naples  and  Lombardy  ib. 
Torce         -  -  9)  53 

Tournaments  2,  3, 1 1, 28, 29,  38 
Traverses  -  S7>  5^ 

Treasurer  of  England       65,  66 

of  Scotland  ib. 

Trefoils  -  -  57 

Trimmings  -  i 

Trinoda  necessitas         -  49 

Turban  -  -  -  54 
Tournaments         -       135,  136 


Valvasores,  majores  and  mi- 

nores  -  -  -  49 
Veneur,  Grand,  in  France  66 
Verge         -         -  -         49 

Viscounts,  their  coronets, 
titles  and  privileges,  robes 
and  creation  -  47 

Viscount  -  -  46 

Volets         ...  8 

Voles         -         -         -  13 

Z 


w. 

War,  cries  of 

Women  their  precedency       172 
Wreaths  -  54,  55 

Wreath         -  .  9,  10 


23,24 


The    Contents    of  the 
Chapters^  Part  IV. 


CHAP.  I.  concerning  the  ex- 
terior ornaments  of  the 
shield,  with  several  addi- 
tional trimmings         -  i 

Chap.  n.  of  the  helmet  or 
casque         .         .        .         , 

Chap.  in.  of  the  ornaments 
of  the  helmet  called  man- 
tlings,  lambrequins,  hache- 
ments,  volets,  &c.  6 

Chap.  IV.  of  the  wreath  or 
torce         .         .         .  p 

Chap.  V.  of  the  crest  or  cimier  i  o 

Chap.  VI.  mottos,  cries  of  war, 
and  devices  -  -         20 

Chap.  VII.  of  supporters         27 

Chap.  VIII.  of  diadems  and 
crowns,  their  ancient  and 
modern  forms  -  oy 

Chap.  IX.  of  the  cap  of  State  55 

Chap.  X.  of  ensigns  belonging 
to  Ecclesiastical  dignities     56 

Chap.  XI.  ensigns  of  civil  and 
military  offices,  and  other 
politic  offices  of  dignity  and 
chivalry         -  .  gj 

Chap.  XII.  of  the  compart- 
ment -  -  133 

Chap.  XIII.  of  manteauxes 
and  pavilions  -  13(5 

Chap.  XIV.  of  nobility,  with 
its  proofs  regularly  count- 
ed as  they  are  placed  on 
funeral  escutcheons,  &c.   142 

Chap.  XV.  of  Cavalcades 
and  public  processions        150 

Chap.  XVI.  of  the  office  of 
heralds         -  -  164 

Chap.  XVII.  of  precedency  168 


INDEX  OF  SURNAMES,  \£c. 


THE  CONTENTS  OF  THE  PARTICULylR  FAMILIES  IFHOSE  GENEALOGT  IS 
INSERTED  IN  THIS  APPENDIX. 


Page. 

KEITH,  Earl  Marischal  i 

Keith  Earl  of  Kiiitore  lo 
Dumlas  of  that  Ilk,  with  the 

cadets  thereof  1 1  to  17 

Foulis  of  Colliiigton  17 

Chalmers  of  G  litgirth  19 

Mowbray  of  Barnbougle  21 

Moo(iie  of  Melsetter  22 

Ross  of  Craii,!e            -  23 

Spreul  of  Cowden         -  24 

Farquharson  of  Invrrcauld  ib. 

Whiteford  of  Ulairquhan  25 

Griham  of  Balj^owan  ib. 

Kinloch  of  that  Hk  ib. 

Mackenzie  of  Garloch  27 

Melvilio  Earl  .-^f  MdviUe  28 

.  Moncrief  of  that  Ilk  29 

G^Tord  of  Busta            -  30 

AVcmyss  Earl  of  Wemyss  3.1 

Hamilton  of  Olivestob  36 

Kennedy  Earl  of  Cassilis  ib. 

Kennedy  of  Bennen  38 

Kennedy  of  Balmaclanachan  ib. 
Kennedy  of  Glenmuck  and 

Bellimore         -         -  39 

Millar  of  Temple  ib. 
Cunningham  E.  of  Glencairn  40 

Macintosh  of  that  Ilk  43 

■  Scrymgeour  of  Diidop  46 

Stewart  of  Phisgall          -  49 

M'Dowall  of  Freugh  50 
Douglas  of  Bonjedward  and 

Tympyndean              -  54 

Scott  of  rhirlestane  55 

Cumin  of  Coulter         -  56 

Inglis  of  Sc  L-^onards  57 

Ma.farl?nc  of  that  Ilk  58 

•Anstruther  of  that  Ilk  61 

Birnie  of  that  Ilk         -  .  65 

-  Irvine  of  Drum  66 
Pringle  or  !  '.on-Pringle  of  Ga- 
lashiels and  Whitebank  68 


Page. 
69 
73 
75 
78 
79 


Horn,  surname  of 
S..mcrvillo  L.  Somer^Mlle 
Sfwart  of  Ar.lvorlich 
Chancellor  of  Shiekdiill 
Macfarlanc  of  Kirkton 
Arbuthnot  V.  of  Arbuthnot    80 
Petrie,  surname  of  87 

Crawfurd  of  Auchinamcs    ^    88 
Hope  of  Craighall  91 

Fergusson  ot  Craigdarroch      ib. 
Lawson  of  Humbie        -         92 
Lawson  of  Heiriga,  Lnchtul- 
loch,  Boghall,  aud  Cambo  93 

9S 
98 


Lawson  of  Ca' 
M'Dowall  of  Logan 
Kelso  of  that  Ilk  -  102 

Copland  of  Collieston  103 

Corthwick  L.  Borthwick        104 
Fvazer  Lord  Lovat  107 

Moray  of  Abercairny        -     iio 
Corsan  of  Meikleknox  112 

Chalmers  of  Balnecraig  znA 

Cults  -  -  114 

Sibbald  of  Balgony,  and  Lun- 
din  of  Balgony,  now  repre- 
sented byLun«lin  of  Drum  1 19 
Abercromby  of  Birkenbog      i  22 
Meldrum,  family  of 

,  Scott  of  Balwyne 

'  Baillie  of  Lamington 

j  Hay  of  Ranfield  and  Inch- 
nock 
Lockhart  of  Cleghorn 

;  Charteris  of  Amisfield 

I  Leslie  of  Findrassie 

■  Banneriiian  of  that  Ilk 

]  Renton,  Sir  Thomas 

I  Roberton  of  that  Ilk,  and  of 

I       Earnock 
Stewart  of  Lorn  and  Grand- 
tully 


Pago. 
Edraonstone,  particularly  of 

Duntreath  -  -  ijj 
Stewart  ot  Burr, iy         -  161 

St  Clair  of  Koslin  163 

Campbell  ol  SKerrington  166 
Atliol,  the  Earls,  Marquisscs, 

and  Dukes  of  167  to  202 

Stormunt,  Viscount  of  202 

Rutherford  Lo-.l  Rutherford, 

and  Karl  of  leviot  209 

Campbell  ot  Gleiiorchy,  now 

Earl  of  Breailalbane  21 1 

Shuikot  that  Ilk         -  219 

Gordon  ol  Goidoivbank  220 

OgiUy  of  Barr,is         -  ib. 

C.ilder,  fannly  of  -  229 

Botliwell,   Lord  Holyrood- 

house  -  233 

De  Berkeley,  family  of,  or 

Barclay,  formerly  of  Ma- 
thers -  -  236 
Carnegie  of  Ballindarg  242 
Mcuzicsof  thatllkjorotWeemib. 
Vans  ot  Barnbaroch  248 
M'Dowall  of  Freugh  250 
Muirhead  of  Lachop  256 
Dundas  of  Fmgask  267 
Urquhart  of  Cromarty  and 

Meldrum  -  -  273 
Sonierville  of  Camnethan  276 
Scott  of  Horslinill  -  279 
Scott  of  Scotstarvet  ib. 

Scott  of  Es'vdale  &  Houpay- 

slay,  now  of  rhirlestane  286 
Cumungham  of  Bandalloch  288 
Edmonswne  of  Duntreath  290 
Garthshore  of  that  Ilk  291 

Shaws  of  Hayley  and  Sorn- 

bcg  -  -  -  292 
Riddel  of  that  Ilk         -         294 


(NDEX  OF  SURNAMES,  ^c. 


INDEX  TO  THE  REMARKS  ON  THE  RAGMAN-ROLL. 


Page. 


A. 


ALEXANDER  de  Aber- 

nediy  -  -  I5>  20 

Henry  Epis.  Aberdeen  17 

CoiTuiiuiiitas  Villae  dc  Aber- 
deen        ...         26 
Nicol  de  Achethlec  41 

Alexander  de  Airth  2-; 

Alysandre  Aikmaii         -  38 

Richard  de  Ainli  -  34 

Johan.le  Fitz,  Johan.  de  Ain. 

sley  -  -  32 

Alsyndure  de  Allardyss  45 

Comes  de  Angus  -  6 

Johannes  I'riorde  St  Andrerc  15 
Jlcnricus  de  Anstruther  ib. 

CJilbertus  Comes  de  Angus  18 
<Jodofredus  de  Androssan  24 
Henry  le  Fitz,  Annand.  37 

Annobel,  who  was  the  wife 

of  Sir  Patriclc  Graham  49 
Henry  Abbot  of  Arbroath  18,  28 
Maurice  dc  Arncaple  35 

Frere  Alysandre  do  Argyle  46 
Comes  de  Atliolie  -  6 


Joannes  de  Baliol 

S 

Alexander  de  Baliollo 

TO 

Walter  mUgister  D.  de  B?.'- 

Hncrief 

17 

Williel.  Abbas  St  Edward's 

de  Balmerinoch 

27 

Fergus  de  Bard 

42 

John  and  Robert  Bards 

46 

Dominus  de  Badonoch 

9 

Robert  us  de  Betliune         15 

31 

Patricius  de  Berkley 

25 

Walterus  de  Berkleys 
Robert  de  Betun 

36 

44 

David  Blare 

3^- 

Robert  de  Blackburn 

42 

William  de  Boseuile 

32 

William  de  Boswell 

43 

Robert  de  Boyvil 

Richard  de  Boyvil 

Thomas  de  Boys 

Robert  Boyt 

Brianus  filius  AUani            5 

40 
45 
34 
3S 

)  21 

Robcrtus  de  Brus 

4 

David  de  Brichcn 

3' 

Ralph  Broun 

4-; 

William  Brun  de  Gamelshiels  46 

Brian  precej-aormditia:  Temp 

i'7 

Joannes  Cumine,  Comes  de 

BucJbaa 

21 

Page. 

John  Conte  de  Buchan  28 

Alex,  de  Bunkill          -  30 

Comes  de  Buchan          -  6 

Malcolm  de  Buquhannan  39 

William  Butle             -  40 

Thomas  de  Buncle  43 

Thomas  Buntyng          -  44 


C. 

Johannes  Cambrun  1 7 

Johannes  de  Callentar  19 
Robertus  de  Camburn  de  Bal- 

grenach  -  -  20 
Robertus  Camburn  deBalnely  ib. 

Andreas  Abbas  de  Cupro  28 

Nicol  Cambell         -         -  ib. 

Johannes  de  Callentyr  ib. 

Duncan  Cambel  del  Isles  33 

Thomas  Cambel           -  34 

Dougal  Cambell            -  38 

Arthur  Cambell              -  ib. 

Duncan  Cambell           -  ib. 

Sir  Dovenald  Cambel  47 

Johan.  Fitz,  Neil  de  Carrick  40 

Gilbert  de  Carlyle         -  46 

Andreas  de  Charteris  23 

Reginaldus  le  Chein  25 
Thomas  del   Charteris   del 

Conte  de  Roxburgh  32 

Robert  de  la  Chambre  j8 

Symon  de  Ic  Chambre  42 

John  de  Chisome          -  43 

Osbert  de  Chartre         -  44 

Marcus  de  Clypan         -  27 

Walterus  de  Corry         .  19 

Brianus  Abbas  de  St  Colm  28 

Thomas  de  Colvil          .  29 

Roger  Corbet         -        -  32 

Thomas  de  Cockburn  33 

Walter  de  Congletou  36 

Piers  de  Cockburn  37 

Adam  Corbet             .  42 

Thomas  de  Colvyle        -  46 

Adam  de  Colvile          -  ib. 

John  de  Corbet             -  47 

Cruck  de  Fingaldston  4 

Radulphus  de  Crawforde  1 1 

Adam  Abbas  Sancte  Crucis  27 
Reynald  de  Crawford,  del 

Cont  de  Air             -  33 

Johan.  de  Crawford  35 

Roger  de  Crawford  37 

Joan,  de  Craigy           -  39 

Roger  de  Crawford  40 

William  de  Crawford  41 

Thomas  de  Crightoii  42 

Henry  Craick         -          -  44 

Renauid  de  Crawforde  46 


Page. 
Johan.  de  Crawford  -  41) 
Cumin  Earl  of  Buchan  4 

Sir  John  Cumine  of  Badenoch  ib. 
Willielmus  Cumine  1 1 

Andreas  Abbas  de  Cupro  16 
Patricius  Abbas  de  Cambus. 

kenneth  -  -  27 

Marjory  Cumin,  Dame  de 

Gordon  .  -  34 

Robert  de  Cuninghame  48 


Henry  de  Dalmahoy  40 

Thomas  de  Dalziel  47 

AUeyn  Dinwithie         -  43 

Willielmus  de  Douglas     13,  30 
D.  Williel.  Douglas  18 

William   Fitz  Andrew  de 

Douglas  -  -  44 

Williel.  Abbas  de  Drybrugh  28 
Patricius  Dunbar  Comes  Mar- 
chic  "  "  S 
William  Bishop  of  Dumblane  13 
Radulphus  Abbot  of  Dun- 
fermline -  14,  28 
Serle  de  Dundas  .  34 
Gilbert  de  Drummond  37 
Robertus  de  Dundas  3S 
Niel  Fitz  Robert  de  Dulop     40 


Giles  de  Eastwood         .  38. 

Radulphus  de  Eglinton  24 

Gilmore  Fitz  Edward  41 

Raulf  de  Eglinton         -  40 

Burgensesde  Elgin         -  16 

Philip  le  Engleys           -  42 

John  de  Engleys           -  ib, 

John  de  Elphingston  24 

Aleyn  de  Elphingston  42 

John  de  Ergadia            .  17- 

Alex.  de  Ergyll           .  26, 
Malcolm  de  Ergadia  frere  Sir 

Alex,  de  Ergadia        -  38 

William  de  Eyion         -  43 

F. 

Robertus  le  Falconer        25,  45 

Robert  de  Fausyde  37 

Williel.  de  Feiiton         .  16 

Ralph  Ferrye               -  41 

i'ifc,  Earl  of               -  4 

I  itzgilbc-rt  de  Hamildon  3 
Sier  le  Fitz  Thomas  de  Frisle  43 


INDEX  OF  StJRNAMES,  ^c 


Page. 

William  le  Fleming  38 

H-nri'  i!o  Foderinghay  33 

Fergus  Fosterson          -  3 1 
Frazer  Bisliop  of  St  Andrews  4 

D.  Ricardus  Frisel  13 

Dom.  Ajadreas  Fraser  14 

Simeon  Freshele           -  16 
Williol.  Fraser         -          21,  30 

Duiicanus  de  Frendraught  25 

Alexander  Frisele          -  29 

Bernard  Fresar            -  34 

William  Fraser           -  ib. 

Andrew  Fraser           -  40 

Robert  Fraser              -  42 

Ada  de  Fraser              -  42 

Thomas  de  Frisle          -  43 

Lanrence  de  Frisle         -  44 

Andrew  Frisel               -  45 

Sir  Richard  Fraser         -  47 


Arthur  de  Galbrait         -  36 

Donald  Fitz  Gilbert  31 

Thomas  de  GiUngy  ib. 

Rcbertus  Epis.  Glascuen.  26 

Johannes  de  Glenesk  24 

D.  Williel.  de  Gordino  19 

D.  Adam  de  Gordon  27 
■William  de  Gourlay  de  Bagally  3 1 

Patricius  Graham          -  10 

David  de  Graham         -  18 

Robert  de  Graunt         -  37 

Sir  Nicol  de  Graham  47 


H. 

Radulphus  de  Hauden  :o 

Williel.  de  Hayia          -  14 

Hugo  de  la  Hay           -  15 

Johannes  de  la  Hay  ib. 

Johannes  de  Hr.yia  20 

D.  Nicolaus  de  la  Hayia  22 

Gilbertus  de  Hayia         -  24 

Hugo  de  !a  Hay           -  25 

Alex,  de  Hately            -  27 

Aylmer  de  Hauden           29,  34 

Eyliner  de  Hauden         -  34 

Gilbert  de  Hanyethe  39 

William  de  Harris         -  46 

Abbot  of  Holyroodhouse  13 

Alex,  de  Hogston         -  27 

Adam  le  Hoip         -         -  32 

John  de  Hope         -         -  44 

Roger  de  Houden         -  45 
Walter  Fitz  Gilbert  de  Ho- 

mildon           -           -  46 

Geofry  de  Hume           -  38 

Aylmer  de  la  Huntar  40 


Alex.  Price  of  St  John  of 
Jerusalem         -         -  17 


Page,  j 
Johannes  Abbas  de  Jedworth  28  ' 
Tliomas  le  Johnston  32 

Johannes  le  Johnston  3() 

Walter  Johnston  -  43 

Gilbert  de  Johnston  45 


Alex.  Kennedy  -  22 

Ricardus  Abbas  de  Kclso  28 

Hugo  d"  Kelso  -  3 1 

Williehnus  Ker  -  ib. 

Henricus  Ker  -  36 

Tliomas  do  Kellyhill  39 

William  de  Kethkerk  40 

Nicol  Ker  -  -  44 

Andrew  de  Ker  -  .•jj 

Ivone  de  Kinross  -  15 

Thomas  Kier         -         -  ib. 

Rudolphus  de  Kinnaird  27 
Bernard  .A.bbas  de  Kilwinning  28 

Stephen  de  Kilpatrick  29 

Rodger  de  Kilpatvlck  45 
Gilbertus  Abbas  de  Kylinross  27 


Henry  de  Laudevo 
Comes  de  Levenax 
Normanus  de  Lescelyne 
Malcolm  Conte  de  Levenax 
Norman  de  Lescelyne 
John  Abbot  of  Lindores 
Archibaldus  de  Livingston 
Thomas  Abbas  de  Lhidores 
Andreas  de  Livingston 
James  de  Lindsay 
Sir  Alex,  de  Lindsay 
Sir  Archibald  de  Livingston 
Constantinus  de  J.ochore  vice- 
comes  de  Fife 
Eugen  of  Jjorn 
Sir  Walter  Logan 
Malcolm  Lockhart 
Christin  Loccard 
Thurbrand  de  Logan 
Adam  de  Lurnisden 
Walter  de  Lynne 


M. 

IVIacdowald 

Macduwyl 

Marcus  Sodorensis  Episcop. 

Comes  de  Mar 

Williel.  de  MaiUia 

Maria  Regina  de  Man,  ct 

Comitissa  de  Strathern 
Dovenaldus  Comes  de  Mar  17, 
Pat.  Dunbar  Comes  Marchie 
D.  Herbertus  de  Macuswell 
Jacobus  Jo  Maleville 
Johan.  filius  Herberti  INIacus- 

well         -         -         - 


Page. 
D.  Johannes  de  Maleville       26 
Patrick  Conte  de  la  March, 
et  de  Dunbar  -  29 

Fergus  Macdougal         -  ib. 

Dougal  M.icdougal  30 

Duncan  Fitz  le  Conte  de  Mar  34 
Duncan  Macgilchrist  de  Le- 
venax -  -  -  38 
Gilbert  de  Maclurk  -  40 
John  de  Maccusuel  -  42 
Gilbert  Makmaht  -  46 

Robert  MacComb  -  ib. 
Sir  Herbert  de  Maccusuel  47 
Mary  the  wife  of  Hewe  de 

Aiith         -         -        -         49 
Roger  de  Methfen         -  2 

Patricius  Abbas  de  Melross  28 
D.  Joiian.dcSancto  Michacle  26 
Humphrey  de  Middleton  45 
Gilchrist  More  -  -  2 
John  de  Montgomery  3 

Reginald  More  de  Craig  ib. 

Walterus  Comes  de  Moateith  9 
Williel.  de  Moravia  de  Tolly- 

bardine  -  -  II 

Galfride  de  Moubray  13 

And.  de  Moravia  -  14 

Dom.  Johannes  de  Moravia  ib. 
W.Uiel.  de  Moravia        -  17 

Johannes  de  Moncrief  20 

Hugo  de  Moravia  -  21 

D.  Johannes  de  Moravia  22 

Williel.  de  Monte  Alto  25 

Williel.  de  Moravia       -  26 

Alex.  Comes  tie  MonteitJi  ib. 
Alex.  Conte  de  Monteith  28 
30 
31 

John  de  Montgomery  33 

Reynald  More  de  Craig  34 

Thomas  de  Montgomery  39 

Renaud,  ;.  l:  Reginald  More  40 
Adam  de  la  Mere  -  41 

Murchaw  de  Montgomery  ib. 
Erchibald  de  Moravia  43 

William  de  Moncrief  44 

Johan.  de  Morreff         -  ib. 

Johan.  Monipenny  -  45 

A.l!an  de  Morretf  -  47 

David  MorrefF  -  48 

MurrefF  de  Drumsargard  2 

MurrefF  de  Tholybardine  3 

Robertus  Muscharn  19 

AILmus  de  MurrifF         -  26 

Will,  de  MurrelFde  Drumsar- 
gard        -         -         -  30 
Will.de  MurrilFdeTillibardin  33 
Richard  Mushet           -           44 
Margaret  wife  of  Piers  de 
Lundy           -            -           45 


John  le  Napier 

John  Abbot  of  Newbottle 


Henry  de  Moravia 
Gilchrist  More 


aevi' 


INDEX  OF  SURNAMES,  ^f. 


Page. 
Johannes  Abbas  deNewbottle  28 
James  de  Newton         -  34 

Adam  de  Nisbet  -  42 

I),   '^.ibeitus  de  Normanville  26 
WiU.  Fitz.  Thomas  le  Noble  30 


Walter  Ochterlony 
Piilrick  de  OgilviU 
J>imon  de  Oriock 
Ilewc  de  Oir 


Waltcrus  Abbas  de  Paslyth  27 

Community  of  Perth  16 

Piers  de  Pitcairn  -  38 

Nicol  de  Preston  -  34 


Ralstoun 

Tho.  Randulphi 

Dom.  Adam  de  Ratrief 

Gervasius  de  Rate 

Thomas  de  Ralphiston 


lamsay: 


John  and  Adam  de 
Robert  de  Ramsay 
Thomas  de  Ramsay 
HtiRo  de  Riddel 
Williel.  de  Rothein 
Robertas  Epis.  de  Ross 
Jacobus  filius  Godofredi  de 

Ross,  sen.  and  jun. 
Andreas  filius  Godofredi  de 

William  de  Ross 
Robert  de  Ross 
Sir  William  de  Rothwen 
Ancirew  Fitz  Godofrede  dc 


Page. 
D.  Williel.  de  Ruthven  19 

D.  Nicolaus  de  Rutherford     23 
Aylmcr  de  Rutherford  32 

Robert  Russel        -        -         43 
Nicol  de  Rutherford  ib. 


Michael  Scott         -        -  14 

Thomas  Abbas  de  Scoon  1 7 

Richard  le  Scott  de  Murthock- 

3° 


William  de  Schaw 
Fergus  del  Schaw  -  46 

Alisandre  Scott  de  Pcrthick    48 
Senescal  de  Jedwith         -         2 
James,  Great  Steward  of  Scot-- 
land,  or  Senescallus  Scotis  5., 

9.  '8 
Johannes  Senescalli  11,18 

Jacobus  Senescal  de  Escope  28 
Jolin  le  Senescal  de  Jedwith  32 
John  le  Senescal  Chevalier  38 
D.  Johannes  Sinclair  de  Herd- 

manston         -  -  22 

Wililam  de  Muriff  Signior  de 

Bothwel         -  -  28 

Grcgorie  Sinclair  -  36 

Johan.  Skeen,  Pat.  de  Skeen  44 
Willielmus  de  Soulis  10 

Johannes  de  Soulis  -  ib. 
Ralph  Master  of  the  House 

ofSoutra         -  -  17 

Thomas  de  Somervile  18 

D.  Thomas  de  Soulis  26 

Nicolaus  de  Soulis         -  ib. 

Walter  Spreul  -  36 

Willielmus  de  Sancto  Claro  10 
Henricus  de  Saneto  Claro  32 
Earl  of  Strathern  -  13 

Mahse Comes  deStrathern  17,19 
Johannes  de  Strivelyn  20 

D.  Johan.  de  Strivelyn  de  Mo- 
ravia        -         -         -         24  I 

3 


Page- 
Alex,  de  Straiton  -  ib. 
Malise  Conte  de  Strathern  28' 
Johannes  de  Strivelyn  de  Mu- 

rliF         -         -  -  ib. 

Alisandre  de  Strivelyn  30 

Joannes  de  Strivelyn  de  Carse  30 
William  de  Strivelyn  43 

William  Coi.te  ue  Sutherland  2U 
Henry  de  Swinton  -  42 
William.de  Sydserff        -      34 


D.  David  Torthorald  18 

D.  Thomas  de  Torthorald  26 

Thomas  de  Torthorald  29 

Robertas  de  Turnbulye  27 


Hugo  de  Urre  -  29 

Ingelramus  de  Umphravile      1 1 


Robert  de  la  Val 


W. 


Johan.  Waleis  de  Overton  43 

Nicol  de  Walleis           -  4a 

Adam  le  Walys           -  ib.. 

Aleyn  Walles         -         -  3^ 

Robertas  de  Walyhop  25, 

Walter  de  Wedderburn  34; 

D^  Michael  de  Weems  20 
Wishart,.  Bishop  of  Glasgow    4 

Johannes  .Wishard         -  26 

Willielmus  IJictus  Wiseman  27 

Johannes  de  Whitlawe  37 

John  W  yshurd  del  Mernis  27 

Johan.  Wyscard           —  4^, 


I'loU 


■Jg3£  LA.  Tl^ 


.^/^  Seal  of/^/vr^  jJHauL 
jtjaran  of  Jamrau-e  rvha  ai/e<i 
%.t/.  1348. 


cquel  -hii  pruonrmr  en  1  lujMe  et 
a,  jon  rctcrur  fcmda^  le  Prieure  de 
faint  L  e  onard. ,  ajs  u  dan.i  la  Bar 
'cmnu:  dePanmm:daite.i£  can.. 


Plate 


/(T/^izne  o/-..^f/i'iAA'ni>:r 


\,ytr  llilham,  liio/joniDa) 


ro  Hx  \ut 


^§ 


\  -'A 


"'•4 


/u//ccj-/r//:ijm 


(nu! /('/(/ <f(J'^^i/""<^"'^''-' 


,       HcimiJton  ofJh/il'iun         \^ 


J5c<7t    at    >.yinioi  \ 


hinl^        a,    L     iLuid 
/i  /.tr'.iriJi     yt-  KtUa^  h  at  tJiai  Ilk 

^  A-D-857-    ^  -^ 


/       Gn7Aum     of  Bala  a,  ,-n     \  I         \< ^■S~l~ZrT:. 


///y/////  //ofMeidriini 


^te^- 


g^^i%^ 


■  'm 


Ji/i,i//A<V   (><r.<//<-r/</ 


('/e/'A.  <Y ■^''('7f7f7/C(->pA  Jiar. 


fA)(^ri</<fS  i^<  %/f<;a.'-A 


A,  oc  k/uif '/  (>/  C/i'i.^  hv?^ 


l/n/aAarte/-y3i///i 


(^v'Mr/<'7y  o/i^S?ii/y/n-/</ 


icvn/Jt/i  c^  ^/y-uji  LnoLrn 


A/ir7(Ac'7i  c/-  ("/(ViAm  /^a/^A 


Ja-<  if  M.^n  /: 


//aiya//iZ/u'(y;  Mzc/c^z/cf/u 


rj]UV<If7^>rf'M,i7,n 


^Vnr,<-K^''/  ^<'ru/ 


(]iU'r;rcUu/,'/yW/,r,i 


c<rt,p,f//i'n  iJ/-y//<i/  y/A  -> 


'//.['//wa  'J/)r(7ir/(fs^ /u/i/ccvi 


J .  'L/Ai^7?f(r,'  7\e7iA'/i 


Kef'.  ^^/M7n'/7\7i/ ji'tf^L/j  Jlric/A. 


,    frcM'a/i/.//cn>art 
^a^(/cmi//'    Ben  ' 


JoAn  /W<M///H6!r  fo  f/,fJo,u^ 


V ,  >'^HA\>rvi-rj/-'// 


^^  ^^^^^^"W^^ 


LjearaeHalderihrru:.-  L  niruraioriS