Skip to main content

Full text of "Tarsal ligaments of the spectacled bear, Tremarctos ornatus"

See other formats


LIBRARY  OF  THE 

UNIVERSITY  OF  ILLINOIS 

AT  URBANA-CHAMPAIGN 


590.5 
FI 

v.39 
cop. 3 


NATURAL  HISTORY. 
SURVEY 


- 


' 


> 

*  FIELDIANA  .  ZOOLOGY 

3 

Published  by 
CHICAGO    NATURAL    HISTORY    MUSEUM 

Volume  39  April  21,  1958  No.  13 

TARSAL    LIGAMENTS    OF    THE 
SPECTACLED    BEAR 

Tremarctos  ornatus 

D.  Dwight  Davis 

Curator,  Division  of  Vertebrate  Anatomy 

Among  the  Carnivora  the  tarsal  ligaments  have  been  described 
for  the  domestic  dog  (Baum  and  Zietzschmann,  1936)  and  the  do- 
mestic cat  (Reighard  and  Jennings,  1901).  In  both  these  forms  the 
limbs  are  greatly  modified  for  cursorial  locomotion;  the  tarsus  and 
metatarsus  are  elongated  and  immobilized,  and  the  tarsal  ligaments 
are  reduced  to  little  more  than  collateral  ligaments.  The  structure 
and  mechanics  of  the  ankle  and  foot  differ  greatly  from  those  of  the 
generalized  ferungulates,  such  as  the  Paleocene  Claenodon,  that  were 
supposedly  ancestral  to  the  modern  Carnivora. 

The  bears,  in  contrast,  are  plantigrade  walkers  and  the  bones  of 
the  tarsus  do  not  differ  significantly  from  those  of  Claenodon.  The 
foot  of  the  bears  closely  approximates,  in  fact,  the  primitive  condition 
from  which  were  derived  the  various  specialized  conditions  found 
among  modern  carnivores  and  ungulates.  It  is  impossible  to  under- 
stand the  mechanics  of  the  tarsus  without  a  knowledge  of  the  tarsal 
ligaments,  and  these  ligaments  in  the  bears  are  therefore  of  consid- 
erable interest.  It  is  remarkable  that  they  have  never  been  examined. 

This  description  is  based  on  the  South  American  spectacled  bear, 
Tremarctos  ornatus.  The  animal  dissected  was  an  adult  female 
that  died  in  the  Zoo  in  Brookfield,  Illinois,  and  was  embalmed  for 
anatomical  study.  The  tarsal  bones  of  Tremarctos  are  similar  to 
those  of  other  bears  except  that  they  are  somewhat  less  broadened; 
in  this  respect  they  approach  the  primitive  condition  even  more 
closely  than  does  Ursus.  An  X-ray  of  the  specimen  before  dissection, 
and  the  articulated  bones  of  the  tarsus  and  metatarsus  of  a  second 
individual  of  the  same  species,  along  with  the  tarsal  bones  of  other 
species  of  bears,  of  other  carnivores,  and  of  the  fossil  Claenodon 

Library  of  Congress  Catalog  Card  Number:  58-9928 
No.  838  91 


NATURAL 
,  HISTORY  SURVEY 


92  FIELDIANA:  ZOOLOGY,  VOLUME  39 

corrugatus,  were  referred  to  constantly  during  the  dissection.  Com- 
parisons were  made  with  the  tarsal  ligaments  of  man  as  described 
and  figured  in  standard  textbooks  and  atlases.  The  nomenclature 
of  human  anatomy  has  been  used  wherever  possible  except  that  the 
term  astragalus,  customarily  used  in  comparative  anatomy,  is  used 
in  preference  to  talus.  To  avoid  unnecessary  confusion  in  the  names 
of  ligaments,  talus  has  been  retained  as  a  combining  form. 

The  drawings  illustrating  this  paper  were  made  by  Miss  Phyllis 
Wade,  Assistant  in  the  Division  of  Anatomy,  directly  from  the  dis- 
sections. Thanks  are  due  the  American  Museum  of  Natural  History 
for  the  loan  of  a  specimen  of  Claenodon  corrugatus  (AM  no.  16543). 

THE  TALOCRURAL  ARTICULATION 

Only  five  ligaments  are  involved  in  this  joint,  compared  with  the 
seven  present  in  man.  The  anterior  calcaneotibial  and  tibionavicular 
ligaments  are  not  represented  in  the  bear;  in  man  these  are  both  on 
the  medial  side  of  the  tarsus.  The  remaining  five  ligaments  are 
essentially  as  in  man. 

The  posterior  talofibular  ligament  is  a  strong  band,  circular  in  cross 
section,  running  diagonally  downward  and  mesad  from  the  posterior 
border  of  the  lateral  malleolus  to  the  posterior  surface  of  the  astrag- 
alus just  above  the  groove  for  the  flexor  hallucis  longus  tendon. 

The  anterior  talofibular  ligament  (fig.  12)  is  a  slender  band  arising 
from  the  antero-inferior  border  of  the  malleolus  of  the  fibula,  deep 
to  the  part  of  the  anterior  lateral  malleolar  ligament  that  passes  to 
the  talofibular  meniscus  (see  below).  The  ligament  runs  diagonally 
distally  and  medially  across  the  astragalus,  attaching  to  the  superior 
surface  of  the  neck  of  the  astragalus  immediately  behind  the  talocu- 
neiform  articulation.  A  few  of  its  fibers  continue  distad  beyond  this 
attachment,  to  attach  to  the  superior  surface  of  the  second  cuneiform 
together  with  the  dorsal  talonavicular  ligament. 

The  calcaneofibular  ligament  (fig.  12)  is  a  strong  band  of  fibers 
extending  from  the  calcaneus  above  and  behind  the  posterior  end 
of  the  trochlear  process  to  a  well-marked  area  on  the  distal  end  of 
the  fibula  immediately  anterior  to  the  malleolar  groove.  The  fibers 
along  the  inferior  border  of  the  ligament  pass  onto  the  talofibular 
meniscus. 

The  deltoid  ligament  differs  considerably  from  that  of  man.  Only 
two  of  the  four  elements  are  represented  in  the  bear;  the  longer  pair 
of  ligaments  (the  calcaneotibial  and  tibionavicular)  are  entirely  want- 


faArf/u*'*-      du" 


DAVIS:  TARSAL  LIGAMENTS  OF  SPECTACLED  BEAR 


93 


Sulcus    motaok    f*. 


malleoli    lot    ont 
Meniscus     tolofibulore 
Lig    tolofibulore    oni 

Lig    lalanaviculoricuneiforme    dors 
Lig     noviculoricuneiforme    dors 


Lig     coiconeofibulore 
Sinus    tors 


Lig    totocolconeum  lot. 

Lig    calconeonoviculare 


Fig.  12.    Ligaments  of  right  tarsus  of  Tremarctos  ornatus,  medial  view. 


ing.  The  shorter  anterior  and  posterior  talotibial  ligaments,  however, 
are  present  and  are  very  similar  to  the  corresponding  structures  in  man. 

The  posterior  talotibial  ligament  (fig.  13)  is  a  band  of  fibers  arising 
from  the  distal  surface  of  the  medial  malleolus  of  the  tibia,  immedi- 
ately anterior  to  the  malleolar  groove.  The  fibers  pass  downward 
and  slightly  backward,  to  insert  into  the  medial  surface  of  the  body 
of  the  astragalus. 

The  anterior  talotibial  ligament  (fig.  13)  arises  from  the  anterior 
margin  of  the  medial  malleolus,  directly  laterad  of  the  origin  of  the 
posterior  talotibial  ligament,  and  passes  forward  and  downward  to 
the  dorsal  surface  of  the  neck  of  the  astragalus,  below  the  anterior 
part  of  the  medial  malleolar  surface. 

A  well-developed  interarticular  meniscus,  the  talofibular  meniscus 
(new  name),  is  situated  between  the  lateral  malleolus  of  the  fibula 
and  the  lateral  malleolar  surface  of  the  astragalus  (fig.  12).  The 
meniscus  is  a  narrow  crescent-shaped  structure,  14  mm.  long  by 
3  mm.  wide.  It  is  wedge-shaped  in  cross  section,  the  thick  outer 
edge  measuring  about  1  mm.  The  lateral  end  of  the  cartilage  is  held 
in  place  by  a  tract  of  fibers  that  emerges  from  beneath  the  calcaneo- 
fibular  ligament  and  apparently  represents  a  differentiation  from  that 
ligament;  the  medial  end  is  held  by  a  tract  of  fibers  lying  superficial 
to  the  anterior  lateral  malleolar  ligament  and  apparently  representing 
a  differentiation  from  that  ligament. 


94 


FIELDIANA:  ZOOLOGY,  VOLUME  39 


Lig    tolodbiole    ant 
Lig    colcaneonovic    dors 


Tendo    m.    e»l.    hollucis    long 
retinaculum 


Tendo    m.    tibialis    ant. 
Lig.   tarsometatarseum    plont 

Os     Sesomoideum    tibiale 


Lig  tatocolcan.  inteross. 
-Sustentaculum    calc. 
■Lig    colcaneonovic.   plant. 
Tendo    m.    tibialis    post. 


Fig.  13.    Ligaments  of  right  tarsus  of  Tremarctos  ornatus,  laterial  view. 

The  presence  of  this  interarticular  meniscus  implies  lateral  thrust 
of  the  astragalus  against  the  fibula.  Such  thrust  would  be  developed 
if  the  foot  were  employed  in  a  position  of  strong  inversion,  as  it  is 
in  climbing. 


INTERTARSAL  ARTICULATIONS 

TALOCALCANEAL  LIGAMENTS 

The  talocalcaneal  joint  is  the  key  to  all  tarsal  movements  except 
those  in  the  sagittal  plane  (extension  and  flexion).  The  astragalus 
and  calcaneus  are  bound  together  by  five  short  ligaments,  as  in  man, 
and  their  arrangement  and  relations  are  similar  to  those  in  man.  The 
functioning  of  these  ligaments  may  be  compared  roughly  with  the 
cruciate  ligaments  of  the  knee.  In  the  bear,  however,  the  talocal- 
caneal group  is  dominated  by  two  of  these  bands,  the  lateral  and 
medial  talocalcaneal  ligaments,  which  greatly  exceed  the  others  in 
bulk.  The  medial  in  particular  differs  from  the  corresponding  lig- 
ament in  man. 

The  posterior  talocalcaneal  ligament  (fig.  13)  is  a  broad  flat  band 
forming  the  lateral  wall  of  the  groove  for  the  flexor  hallucis  longus 
tendon.  The  short  fibers  attach  at  one  end  to  the  astragalus  along 
the  lateral  edge  of  the  groove,  run  backward  and  slightly  downward, 
and  attach  to  the  medial  surface  of  the  neck  of  the  calcaneus  a  short 


DAVIS:  TARSAL  LIGAMENTS  OF  SPECTACLED  BEAR 


95 


OS    noviculore 

Lig  colconeonovic 
dors 


Lig.  toiocolc    med 

Lig.  colconeonovic 
plant 


Smus   tarsi 

Faoes   ortic    med 
colconei 


Os    cuboideum 


Lig    calcaneocuboid 
dors 


Lig    colconeonovic 
g    toiocolc    lot 


Y       /    Focies    ortic     lot 
/^>  colconei 


Lig    toiocolc.   mteross 
Lig.  toiocolc    ant 


Fig.  14.    Ligaments  of  right  tarsus  of  Tremarctos  ornatus,  dorsal  view,  after 
removal  of  astragalus. 


distance  behind  the  lateral  facet;  a  slight  scar  on  the  bone  marks  the 
site  of  attachment. 

The  anterior  talocalcaneal  ligament  (fig.  14)  is  situated,  as  in  man, 
in  the  sinus  tarsi  posterior  to  the  interosseous  ligament.  It  attaches 
at  one  end  to  the  calcaneus  immediately  anterior  to  the  lateral  facet, 
and  at  the  other  to  the  astragalus  along  the  anteromedial  border  of 
the  lateral  facet. 

The  medial  talocalcaneal  ligament  (figs.  14,  15)  is  a  very  heavy 
rope-like  tract  of  fibers.  It  is  attached  at  one  end  to  the  inferior 
surface  of  the  astragalus,  in  the  fovea-like  depression  between  the 
navicular  articular  surface  and  the  medial  facet,  and  at  the  other  end 
to  the  medial  surface  of  the  calcaneus  immediately  in  front  of  the 
sustentaculum.  Thus  the  fiber  direction  is  diagonally  downward 
and  outward. 

The  deep  fovea-like  depression  on  the  astragalus,  reminiscent  of 
the  fovea  on  the  head  of  the  femur,  is  wanting  in  man  and  other 
primates.  In  man  its  site  is  occupied  by  the  articular  surface  for  the 
plantar  calcaneonavicular  ligament  (this  articulation  is  wanting  in 
the  bear),  and  in  man  the  medial  ligament  is  shifted  back  to  the 
posterior  process  at  the  rear  of  the  astragalus.  The  fovea  is  present 
in  other  carnivores,  in  the  creodont  Claenodon,  and  at  least  in  Eri- 


96  FIELDIANA:  ZOOLOGY,  VOLUME  39 

naceus  among  the  insectivores.  Thus  it  appears  that  the  attachment 
site  in  man  (and  presumably  in  other  primates)  is  a  secondary  one, 
as  the  ligament  has  been  displaced  from  its  original  site  by  the 
development  of  an  articulation  with  the  plantar  calcaneonavicular 
ligament. 

The  lateral  talocalcaneal  ligament  (figs.  14,  15)  is  likewise  a  very 
heavy  tract  of  short  fibers.    It  attaches  at  one  end  to  the  lateral 


Lig  talocalc.  lot 


Fig.  15.     Anterior  view  of  right  astragalus  and  calcaneus  of  Tremarctos 
ornatus,  showing  relations  of  lateral  and  medial  talocalcaneal  ligaments. 


surface  of  the  neck  of  the  astragalus,  and  at  the  other  to  the 
superior  surface  of  the  calcaneus,  in  front  of  the  lateral  facet;  a  con- 
spicuous scar  marks  the  calcaneal  attachment  site.  Fiber  direction, 
as  for  the  medial  ligament,  is  diagonally  downward  and  outward. 

The  lateral  and  medial  ligaments  embrace  the  long  axis  of  the 
medial  articular  facets  between  them,  thus  severely  restricting  an- 
teroposterior gliding  movements  in  this  part  of  the  joint.  They 
actually  embrace  a  shifting  vertical  axis  for  the  lower  tarsal  joint, 
restricting  movements  between  the  astragalus  and  calcaneus  almost 
entirely  to  rotation  around  this  axis.  The  result  is  that  major  excur- 
sion in  the  lower  tarsal  joint  is  between  the  two  lateral  facets,  which 
are  longer  than  the  medial  facets  to  accommodate  this  movement. 
Because  of  the  arching  of  the  lateral  facets,  rotatory  movements  in 
the  lower  tarsal  joint  are  translated  into  eversion-inversion  move- 
ments of  the  foot. 

The  interosseous  ligament  (fig.  14)  is  similar  to  the  corresponding 
ligament  of  man.  It  lies  in  the  sinus  tarsi  and  consists  of  a  long  tract 
of  short  fibers  extending  between  the  astragalar  and  calcaneal 
grooves. 


DAVIS:  TARSAL  LIGAMENTS  OF  SPECTACLED  BEAR  97 

DORSAL  TARSAL  LIGAMENTS 

A  dorsal  talonaviculocuneiform  ligament  (fig.  12)  represents  the 
dorsal  talonavicular  ligament  of  human  anatomy.  In  the  bear  it  is 
a  flat  band  running  diagonally  across  the  dorsal  surface  of  the  foot, 
from  the  anterior  surface  of  the  body  of  the  astragalus  lateral  to  the 
neck,  to  the  dorsal  surface  of  the  second  cuneiform.  The  ligament 
is  attached  to  the  superior  surface  of  the  navicular  as  it  passes  over 
that  bone,  but  its  main  attachment  is  to  the  cuneiform. 

The  bifurcate  ligament  of  man  is  represented  in  the  bear  only  by 
the  superior  (calcaneonavicular)  part;  the  inferior  (calcaneocuboid) 
part  is  wanting.  The  pars  calcaneocuboidea  is  often  wanting  in  man 
(Braus,  1929).  The  calcaneonavicular  ligament  (fig.  14)  is  a  thin  flat 
band  running  across  the  dorsum  of  the  foot,  from  a  point  just  above 
the  distal  end  of  the  trochlear  process  of  the  calcaneus  to  the  dorso- 
lateral corner  of  the  navicular.  Its  medial  end  passes  deep  to  the 
anterior  talonavicular  ligament. 

The  dorsal  calcaneocuboid  ligament  (fig.  14)  is  a  short  flat  band 
extending  anterolateral^  from  the  anteromedial  angle  of  the  coracoid 
process  of  the  calcaneus  to  the  superior  surface  of  the  cuboid  near  its 
posteromedial  angle. 

The  dorsal  cuboideonavicular  ligament  is  a  short  band  extending 
transversely  between  the  lateral  border  of  the  navicular  and  the 
adjacent  border  of  the  cuboid  on  the  dorsum  of  the  foot. 

The  dorsal  naviculocuneiform  ligaments  are  represented  by  three 
isolated  short  bands  extending  between  the  anterior  border  of  the 
dorsum  of  the  navicular  and  the  superior  surfaces  of  the  cuneiforms, 
one  ligament  passing  to  each  of  the  three  bones.  The  broadest  lig- 
ament is  associated  with  the  third  cuneiform. 

PLANTAR  TARSAL  LIGAMENTS 

The  ligaments  on  the  plantar  surface  differ  considerably  from 
those  in  man,  not  only  in  detail  but  also  in  basic  pattern.  Fibro- 
cartilaginous sesamoid  cartilages  are  more  extensively  developed  than 
in  man.  The  navicular  fibrocartilage  of  human  anatomy  is  represented 
by  a  large  nodule  situated  beneath  the  medial  end  of  the  navicular, 
the  first  cuneiform,  and  the  tibial  sesamoid.  It  is  associated  with  the 
insertion  of  the  tendon  of  the  posterior  tibial  muscle  and  the  ventral 
fibers  of  the  plantar  calcaneonavicular  ligament.  There  is  also  a 
group  of  metatarsal  fibrocartilages  beneath  the  proximal  ends  of 
metatarsals  2-4,  which  are  associated  with  the  attachments  of  the 


98  FIELDIANA:  ZOOLOGY,  VOLUME  39 

long  plantar,  the  medial  plantar,  and  the  plantar  tarsometatarsal 
ligaments. 

The  long  plantar  ligament  (figs.  12,  16)  is  the  largest  tarsal  liga- 
ment. It  is  composed  of  two  subequal  parts,  a  lateral  part  passing 
over  two  joints  and  a  compound  medial  part  that  extends  over  one 
joint  at  a  time.  The  two  parts  are  inseparable  proximally,  arising 
as  a  unit  from  the  prominent  anterior  tubercle  on  the  inferior  surface 
of  the  calcaneus  near  the  cuboid  articulation.  The  lateral  part  passes 
over  the  ventral  tuberosity  of  the  cuboid  without  attaching  to  the 
bone,  and  inserts  into  the  ventral  tuberosity  at  the  base  of  the  fifth 
metatarsal. 

The  medial  part  of  the  long  plantar  ligament  is  interrupted  by 
the  ventral  tuberosity  of  the  cuboid,  which  divides  it  into  proximal 
and  distal  parts.  The  proximal  fibers,  arising  from  the  anterior 
tubercle  of  the  calcaneus,  insert  into  the  proximal  surface  of  the 
cuboid  tuberosity.  The  distal  fibers  arise  from  the  distal  border  of 
the  cuboid  tuberosity  and  insert  into  the  metatarsal  fibrocartilage 
underlying  the  base  of  the  fourth  metatarsal. 

The  medial  plantar  ligament  (new  name)  is  not  represented  in  man. 
It  lies  parallel  to  and  immediately  mesad  of  the  long  plantar  liga- 
ment, separated  from  the  latter  by  an  interval  (fig.  16).  Like  the 
long  plantar  ligament,  it  is  composed  of  a  long  and  a  short  element. 
These  have  a  common  proximal  origin  from  the  antero-inferior  border 
of  the  calcaneus  directly  above  the  groove  for  the  flexor  hallucis 
longus.  The  long  lateral  part  passes  over  the  tuberosity  of  the 
navicular  without  attaching  to  the  bone,  and  inserts  into  the  meta- 
tarsal fibrocartilage  beneath  the  base  of  metatarsal  3.  The  short 
medial  part  attaches  to  the  proximal  and  inferior  surfaces  of  the 
tuberosity  of  the  navicular. 

The  plantar  calcaneocuboid  ligament  (short  plantar  ligament)  is 
completely  covered  by  the  long  plantar  ligament.  It  is  a  short  band 
attached  to  the  anterior  surface  of  the  calcaneus  between  the  ante- 
rior tubercle  and  the  cuboid  articular  surface,  and  passes  straight 
forward  to  attach  to  the  inferior  surface  of  the  cuboid  between  the 
tubercle  and  the  calcaneal  articular  surface. 

The  plantar  calcaneonavicular  ligament  (figs.  13, 14, 16)  is  a  broad 
thick  plate  arising  from  the  whole  anterior  border  of  the  sustentacu- 
lum and  inserting  into  the  medial  part  of  the  inferior  surface  of  the 
navicular,  the  proximal  surface  of  the  tibial  sesamoid,  and  the  navic- 
ular fibrocartilage.  Dorsomedially  it  is  blended  with  the  inferior 
edge  of  the  dorsal  calcaneonavicular  ligament.     The  general  fiber 


DAVIS:  TARSAL  LIGAMENTS  OF  SPECTACLED  BEAR 


99 


direction  is  anteroposterior.  The  ligament  bridges  the  medial  part 
of  the  notch  between  the  sustentaculum  and  the  navicular;  the  lateral 
part  of  this  notch  is  filled  with  fat,  connective  tissue,  and  the  medial 
talocalcaneal  ligament  (fig.  14).  The  inner  surface  is  cupped  to 
receive  the  head  of  the  astragalus.  Thus  the  ligament  would  appear 
to  form  a  functional  part  of  the  socket  in  which  the  head  of  the 
astragalus  articulates,  as  it  does  in  man.  In  the  bear  there  is  no 
articular  surface  on  the  opposing  area  of  the  astragalus,  however, 
and  it  is  therefore  evident  that  the  ligament  does  not  help  support 
the  down  thrust  of  the  astragalus  head  as  it  does  in  man.  A  large 
nodule  of  fibrocartilage,  the  navicular  fibrocartilage  of  human  anat- 
omy, is  embedded  in  the  ligament  between  the  medial  ends  of  the 


Lig    tok>hb:ole    post 


Lig    colcooeooovic    plant 
Tendo    m    tibialis    post 


Ligg    torsometotorseo 
plant 


Os    sesomoideum    tibial* 
Os    cuntiforme  I  (fibrocortiloge 
covering) 


Ligg    novicukvicuntif 
plant 


Lig    plontore    med. 

Tuberos.    ossn    novic 
A(\. Lig     plontor*     long 


Fig.  16.    Ligaments  of  right  tarsus  of  Tremarctos  ornatus,  plantar  view. 


100  FIELDIANA:  ZOOLOGY,  VOLUME  39 

sustentaculum  and  the  navicular;  distally  it  is  embraced  between 
the  tuberosity  of  the  navicular  and  the  tibial  sesamoid.  The  medial 
face  of  the  ligament  is  grooved  for  the  posterior  tibial  tendon,  which 
does  not  pass  beneath  the  ligament  and  provide  additional  support 
for  the  astragalar  head  as  it  does  in  man. 

The  plantar  cuboideonavicular  ligament  is  a  short  transverse  band 
running  from  the  lateral  surface  of  the  navicular  tubercle  to  the 
medial  surface  of  the  cuboid  tubercle.  It  lies  deep  to  the  plantar 
calcaneonavicular  ligament. 

The  plantar  navicular  icuneijorm  ligaments  (fig.  16)  are  represented 
by  two  distinct  sets  of  short  bands.  One  extends  anteriorly  and  dor- 
sally  from  the  anterior  border  of  the  navicular  tuberosity  to  the 
inferior  surfaces  of  the  second  and  third  cuneiforms.  The  other 
extends  medially  from  the  medial  border  of  the  navicular  tuberosity 
to  the  inferior  surface  of  the  first  cuneiform  near  its  posterior  end. 

RELATIONS  OF  THE  TIBIAL  SESAMOID 

The  bears,  like  most  pentadactyl  mammals,  have  an  accessory 
bone,  the  so-called  tibial  sesamoid,  on  the  medial  side  of  the  second 
row  of  tarsals  (figs.  13,  16).  In  Tremarctos  this  bone  articulates 
about  equally  with  the  navicular  and  the  first  cuneiform.  This  is 
not  a  true  diarthrosis;  there  is  no  articular  cavity  and  the  contact 
surfaces  of  the  bones  are  not  covered  with  articular  cartilage.  In- 
stead, the  sesamoid  is  tightly  bound  to  the  navicular  and  first  cunei- 
form by  tough  fibrocartilage,  which  is  particularly  heavy  at  the 
periphery  but  is  also  present  over  the  contact  surfaces. 

To  the  tibial  sesamoid  are  attached  certain  tendons  and  ligaments 
that  in  man  attach  elsewhere.  It  serves  primarily  as  the  principal 
site  of  insertion  for  the  tendon  of  the  posterior  tibial  muscle,  which 
in  man  inserts  chiefly  into  the  tubercle  of  the  navicular  bone.1  In 
Tremarctos  the  tibial  sesamoid  is  held  in  place  by  two  ligaments,  in 
addition  to  the  fibrocartilage  that  binds  it  directly  to  the  navicular 
and  first  cuneiform :  the  lateral  fibers  of  the  plantar  calcaneonavicular 
ligament  attach  to  its  proximal  face,  and  the  medialmost  element  of 
the  plantar  tarsometatarsal  ligament  to  its  distal  face.  A  retinacu- 
lum for  the  tendons  of  the  tibialis  anterior  and  extensor  hallucis 
longus  attaches  to  its  external  face.  These  relations  are  essentially 
the  same  in  other  mammals  (Carlsson,  1891). 

1  Whether  or  not  the  sesamoid  often  found  in  this  tendon  in  man  is  homologous 
with  the  tibial  sesamoid  of  quadrupeds  seems  to  me  a  sterile  argument. 


DAVIS:  TARSAL  LIGAMENTS  OF  SPECTACLED  BEAR         101 

The  functional  significance  of  the  tibial  sesamoid,  and  of  its 
counterpart  in  the  forefoot,  the  radial  sesamoid,  is  not  clear.  The 
absence  of  an  articular  cavity  shows  that  the  bone  is  essentially  im- 
mobile. Its  primary  purpose  would  therefore  seem  to  be  to  broaden 
the  tarsus,  although  the  advantage  of  broadening  the  tarsal  complex 
in  this  peculiar  way  is  not  evident. 

TARSAL  MOVEMENTS 

Attempts  to  localize  and  verify  movements  of  the  tarsal  bones  by 
means  of  superimposed  X-ray  photographs  are  not  entirely  success- 
ful because  of  the  small  size  of  the  bones  and  the  complexity  of  the 
movements.  Tracings  of  the  photographs  (figs.  17,  18)  do  verify 
deductions  from  the  dissection  and  from  manipulation  of  tarsal 
bones.  Really  accurate  analysis  of  these  movements  in  the  bear 
would  require  the  use  of  targets  mounted  on  the  ends  of  long  radii 
inserted  into  the  bones,  a  technic  developed  by  Close  and  Inman 
(1953)  in  their  work  on  the  human  tarsus. 

DISCUSSION 

The  tarsus  of  the  bear  is  a  relatively  unspecialized  mammalian 
structure,  the  bones  differing  little  from  those  of  generalized  ferungu- 
lates  of  Paleocene  age.  The  only  plantigrade  mammal  whose  tarsal 
ligaments  are  known  is  man,  and  consequently  it  is  with  man  that 
the  ligaments  of  the  bear  must  be  compared.  To  find  an  ancestor 
common  to  the  Carnivora  and  the  Primates  it  is  necessary  to  go  back 
at  least  80  million  years,  into  the  Cretaceous. 

The  general  pattern  of  the  tarsal  ligaments  is  very  similar  between 
Tremarctos  and  man.  There  are  several  differences,  however,  and 
these  are  intimately  related  to  differences  in  the  mechanics  of  the 
tarsus.    They  are: 

1.  In  the  talocrural  (upper  tarsal)  joint  two  ligaments  found  in 
man  are  absent  in  the  bear:  the  calcaneotibial  and  tibionavicular. 
In  man  these  both  lie  on  the  medial  side  of  the  joint,  and  both  pass 
over  two  joints.  Thus  they  strengthen  the  ankle  assembly,  but  they 
do  so  at  the  expense  of  flexibility. 

2.  In  the  talocalcaneal  (lower  tarsal)  joint  of  the  bear  the  power- 
ful lateral  and  medial  talocalcaneal  ligaments  are  as  important  as  the 
articular  surfaces  on  the  bones  in  determining  the  nature  of  joint 
movements.  By  fixing  a  slightly  shifting  center  of  rotation  just  an- 
terior to  the  medial  facets,  these  ligaments  permit  rotatory  move- 


Fig.  17.  Tracings  from  X-ray  photos  of  right  tarsus  and  pes  of  Tremarctos 
ornatus  in  positions  of  inversion  and  eversion.  Embalmed  specimen;  muscles 
removed,  ligaments  intact;  tibia  clamped  in  vise  and  foot  manipulated  from  distal 
end.  The  black  lines  show  the  foot  in  eversion,  the  red  lines  in  inversion,  with  the 
outlines  of  the  tibia  superimposed.  In  the  upper  tarsal  joint  there  is  very  slight 
rotation  of  the  astragalus  around  the  long  axis  of  the  tibia.  In  the  lower  tarsal 
joint  the  maximum  permissible  rotation  of  the  calcaneus  takes  place  around  the 
astragalus.  Rotation  is  around  a  vertical  axis  passing  obliquely  downward  and 
outward  through  the  trochlea  of  the  astragalus,  then  through  the  calcaneus  ante- 
rior to  the  medial  facet.  The  site  of  this  axis  is  determined  largely  by  the  lateral 
and  medial  talocalcaneal  ligaments.  In  the  transverse  tarsal  joint  the  navicular- 
cuboid  unit  rotates  around  a  longitudinal  axis  passing  proximo-distally  through 
the  interspace  between  the  two  bones.  The  range  of  inversion-eversion  movements 
of  the  foot  results  from  additive  movements  of  both  the  lower  and  transverse 
tarsal  joints. 

102 


Fig.  18.  Tracings  from  X-ray  photos  of  right  tarsus  and  pes  of  Tremarctos 
ornatus  in  positions  of  extension  and  flexion.  Data  as  for  figure  17.  Movement 
is  exclusively  in  the  upper  tarsal  joint.  Extension  is  accompanied  by  a  slight 
displacement  forward  and  upward  of  the  fibula  with  relation  to  the  tibia. 


103 


104  FIELDIANA:  ZOOLOGY,  VOLUME  39 

ments  of  the  astragalar  head — movements  vital  to  eversion-inversion 
movements  of  the  foot.  They  do  not,  however,  allow  the  head  to  be 
displaced  significantly  from  its  position  vis-a-vis  the  cuboid  articu- 
lation on  the  calcaneus — a  feature  vital  to  the  integrity  of  the  four- 
bone  complex  involved  in  the  transverse  tarsal  joint.  Thus  these 
ligaments,  as  much  as  the  articular  facets  themselves,  are  a  key  to 
an  understanding  of  the  mechanics  of  the  bear's  tarsus.  Nothing 
comparable  is  found  in  the  tarsus  of  man. 

3.  In  man  the  major  plantar  complex  is  concerned  primarily  with 
the  structural  stability  of  the  longitudinal  and  transverse  arches  of  the 
foot.  It  is  long  and  narrow,  concentrated  along  the  axis  of  the  long 
plantar  ligament;  the  axis  passes  through  the  third  metatarsal  (which 
is  very  nearly  the  plane  of  balance  of  the  human  foot).  In  the  bear 
there  is  no  longitudinal  arch  and  no  functional  transverse  arch.  The 
plantar  complex  is  short  and  broad,  including  a  ligament  (the  medial 
plantar)  not  found  in  man,  and  with  its  axis  more  laterad  than  in 
man,  passing  through  the  fifth  metatarsal. 

In  man  the  head  of  the  astragalus  is  supported  from  below  by  the 
plantar  calcaneonavicular  ligament,  and  bears  a  special  articular  area 
for  this  articulation.  Failure  of  this  ligament  results  in  "a  kind  of 
flat-footedness,  in  which  the  talus  sinks  down  to  the  sole  surface" 
(Braus).  The  astragalar  attachment  of  the  medial  talocalcaneal  lig- 
ament is  on  the  posterior  part  of  the  bone.  In  the  bear  the  site  of 
the  human  calcaneonavicular  articulation  on  the  astragalar  head  is 
occupied  by  the  attachment  of  the  medial  talocalcaneal  ligament, 
and  the  astragalar  head  is  not  supported  from  below  by  the  plantar 
calcaneonavicular  ligament;  the  ligamentary  part  of  the  "acetabu- 
lum" consists  mostly  of  a  medial  wall. 

In  man  the  posterior  tibial  and  long  peroneal  tendons  together 
form  a  stirrup  that  supports  both  arches.  In  the  bear  neither  of 
these  tendons  reaches  the  plantar  surface,  and  consequently  they 
provide  no  such  support. 

4.  The  tibial  sesamoid  is  a  primitive  mammalian  structure  of 
uncertain  functional  significance.  Its  absence  in  man  represents  a 
departure  from  the  primitive  condition. 

In  general  the  tarsus  of  the  bear  is  a  far  more  flexible  structure 
than  its  human  counterpart.  Even  the  upper  tarsal  joint  (between 
tibia  and  astragalus)  appears  to  be  less  rigidly  restricted  to  hinge 
movement  than  in  man.  Range  of  movement  in  the  lower  tarsal 
joint  (between  astragalus  and  calcaneus)  is  notably  greater  than  in 
man,  and  this  is  likewise  true  of  the  transverse  tarsal  joint.    As  a 


DAVIS:  TARSAL  LIGAMENTS  OF  SPECTACLED  BEAR  105 

supporting  structure,  on  the  other  hand,  it  is  more  poorly  designed 
for  distributing  stresses  and  strains,  and  thus  for  enhancing  the 
stability  of  the  limb  as  a  whole. 

SUMMARY 

1.  The  tarsal  ligaments  of  the  spectacled  bear  are  basically  similar 
to  those  of  man. 

2.  Three  ligaments  found  in  man — the  calcaneotibial,  the  tibio- 
navicular, and  the  calcaneocuboid — are  wanting  in  the  bear. 

3.  One  ligament  found  in  the  bear — the  medial  plantar — is  want- 
ing in  man.  This  ligament  is  associated  with  a  broad  short  plantar 
complex  that  contrasts  with  the  narrow  long  complex  of  man. 

4.  In  the  bear  an  interarticular  meniscus  is  situated  in  the  talo- 
fibular joint. 

5.  In  the  bear  the  medial  and  lateral  talocalcaneal  ligaments  are 
extremely  heavy,  embrace  the  head  of  the  astragalus,  and  are  the  key 
to  movements  in  the  lower  tarsal  joint.  In  man  the  medial  ligament 
has  been  displaced  backward  from  its  original  attachment  site  on  the 
head  of  the  astragalus. 

6.  The  tarsus  of  the  bear  is  a  more  flexible  but  less  stable  structure 
than  is  the  tarsus  of  man. 

REFERENCES 

Baum,  Hermann,  and  Zietzschmann,  Otto 

1936.  Handbuch  der  Anatomie  des  Hundes.  I.  Skelett-  und  Muskelsystems. 
Berlin:  Parey;  viii,  242  pp.,  180  figs. 

Braus,  Hermann 
1929.     Anatomie  des   Menschen.     Ed.  2.        1,   Bewegungsapparat.  Berlin: 
Springer;  xi,  822  pp.,  387  figs. 

Carlsson,  Albertina 

1891.  Untersuchungen  iiber  die  weichen  Teile  der  s.g.  iiberzahligen  Strahlen 
an  Hand  und  Fuss.  Bihang  K.  Svenska  Vet.-Akad.  Handl.,  16,  Aid.  4,  no.  8, 
pp.  1-40,  4  pis. 

Close,  J.  R.,  and  Inman,  V.  T. 

1953.  The  action  of  the  subtalar  joint.  Prosthetic  Devices  Res.  Proj.,  Univ. 
Calif.,  ser.  2,  Issue  24,  7  pp.,  12  figs. 

Morton,  D.  J. 
1935.     The  human  foot;  its  evolution,  physiology  and  functional  disorder. 
New  York:  Columbia  Univ.  Press;  xiii,  244  pp.,  100  figs. 

Reighard,  Jacob,  and  Jennings,  H.  S. 

1901.    Anatomy  of  the  cat.    New  York:  Holt;  xx,  498  pp.,  173  figs.