Skip to main content

Full text of "Testimony of Gen. Walter Bedell Smith. Hearing before the Committee on Un-American Activities, House of Representatives"

See other formats






as Dot 

Testimony of Gen. Walter Bedell Smith 






OCTOBER 13, 1952 

Printed for the use of the Committee on Un-American Activities 

19 Nov J952 

25242 WASHINGTON : 1952 

United States House of Representatives 
JOHN S. WOOD, Georgia, Chairman 
FRANCIS E. WALTER, Pennsylvania HAROLD H. VELDE, Illinois 


CLYDE DOYLE, California DONALD L. JACKSON, California 

JAMES B. FRAZIER, Jr., Tennessee CHARLES E. POTTER, Michigan 

Frank S. Tavenner, Jr., Counsel 
Louis J. Russell, Senior Investigator 
John W. Carrington, Clerk of Committee 
Raphael I. Nixon, Director of Research 



United States House of Representatives, 

Subcommittee of the Committee 

on Un-American Activities, 

Philadelphia, Pa. 


The subcommittee of the Committee on Un-American Activities 
met, pursuant to notice, at 10 a. m., in Federal Courtroom No. 1. Fed- 
eral Building, Philadelphia, Pa., Hon. John S. Wood (chairman) 

Committee members present: Representative John S. Wood (chair- 
man). Francis E. Walter. Clyde Doyle, and Harold H. Velde. 

Staff members present: Frank S. Tavenner, Jr., counsel; Thomas 
W. Beale, Sr., assistant counsel ; Alvin Stokes. William Jackson Jones, 
Earl L. Fuoss, and Frank Bonora, investigators; Raphael I. Nixon, 
director of research; John W. Carrington, clerk : and Thelina Scearce, 

Mr. Wood. The hearing will be in order. 

Mr. Reporter, let the record show that acting under the authority 
of the resolution establishing the House Committee on Un-American 
Activities, I have set up a subcommittee composed of Representatives 
Francis E. Walter, Clyde Doyle, Harold H. Velde, and myself, John 
S. Wood, as chairman, all of whom are present, and for the purpose 
of conducting hearings beginning today, relating to the extent, char- 
acter, and objectives of alleged Communist Party activities in this 
vital defense area. 

(Before hearing testimony of witnesses on the subject of communism 
in the Philadelphia area, the subcommittee gave its attention to 
another phase of its inquiry.) 

Please call the witness who was directed to be subpenaed for today 
by the action of the committee while in session in California. 

Mr. Tavenner. Yes. sir. 

Gen. Walter B. Smith, please. 

Mr. Wood. General Smith, will you raise your right hand and be 
sworn, please, sir \ 

Do you solemnly swear the evidence you shall give this subcommittee 
shall be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help 
you God \ 

General Smtth. I do. 

Mr. Wood. Will you have a seat, please ? 

I shall ask the photographers who desire to take pictures of the 
witness, if he has no objection, to do so before he begins his testi- 
mony, so that the testimony shall not be interfered with. 




Mr. Tavenner. Mr. Chairman, I think that I should make it clear 
that General Smith is being called not because of any connection that 
he may have or any knowledge that he may have of conditions in 
Philadelphia. He is being called here at this time merely as a matter 
of convenience to the committee and as a result of action previously 
taken by the committee regarding an entirely different matter from 
that which is under inquiry here. 

Will you state your full name, please sir ? 

General Smith. Walter B. Smith, general, United States Army. 

Mr. Tavenner. When and where were you born, General Smith ? 

General Smith. Indianapolis, Ind., October 5, 1895. 

Mr. Tavenner. Will you state to the committee, please, in a general 
way, what your scholastic training has been? 

General Smith. I am a graduate of the parochial schools of Indian- 
apolis, manual training high school, and I have had a year of college, 
graduate of the Infantry School, Command and General Staff School, 
the Army War College. 

Mr. Tavenner. What is your Army rank ? 

General Smith. General. 

Mr. Tavenner. I do not think it necessary, Mr. Chairman, to go 
through all of the various important positions that General Smith 
has occupied in the United States Army. That is well known and his 
distinguished career need not, I think, be attempted to be narrated here. 
I would like to ask you, however, what positions of a civil nature you 
have held since 1945. 

General Smith. Assistant Chief — since 1945 — Ambassador to the 
Soviet Union, and Director of Central Intelligence. 

Mr. Tavenner. When did you become Ambassador ? 

General Smith. Early in 1946, and I remained so until 1949, 3 

Mr. Tavenner. When were you appointed Director of the Central 
Intelligence Agency ? 

General Smith. Two years ago. 

Mr. Tavenner. That would be from approximately October of 

General Smith. October 7, 1950. 

Mr. Tavenner. General Smith, during the course of hearings being 
conducted by the Committee on Un-American Activities in Los 
Angeles, the latter part of September, a notice appeared in the news- 
papers relating to testimony alleged to have been given by you in 
the course of a hearing in a civil case. The effect of this statement 
which appeared in the press in Los Angeles was that practically 
every security organization of the Government had been infiltrated 
by Communists, according to your alleged testimony. 

The committee immediately caused a subpena to be issued request- 
ing your appearance here today because this is the first opportunity 
that it has had to meet since completing the hearings in California, 
for the purpose of inquiring of you wdiat the basis was for your testi- 


Now, after returning to Washington from California, we have 
secured by subpena a copy of the transcript of the testimony which 
was the subject of this matter, 1 and I think that J should read the 
pertinent part oi thai testimony before asking any further questions. 

You were asked this question [reading | : 

You worked, did you not, during the time you were Ambassador to Moscow as 
an ollicer of our Slate Department? 

Answer. I did. 

Question. Don't you know as a fact that in 1947 the State Department was 
Infiltrated with Communists? 

Answer. I do not. 

Quest ion. Would you agree in tlie period of General Marshall's administra- 
tion with the accuracy of this statement ? 

Page 55 of the deposition of Senator Benton, and his testimony is 
quoted as follows [reading] : 

I know there were Communists in the State Department — 

and then the question : 

Do you agree that that is a correct statement? 
Answer. I would. 
Question. You would or wouldn't? 
Answer. I would agree that it is a correct statement. 

Question. So that you believe with the Senator that there were Communists in 
the State Department of the United States? 
Answer. I do. I do. I believe there are Communists in my own organization. 

Mr. Walter. I think right there, Mr. Tavenner, it might be perti- 
nent to ascertain why the general volunteered this after answering the 
question : 

I believe there are Communists in my own organization. 

What is the basis of that conclusion, General ? 

General Smith. In the first place, had I left the answer stand as it 
was, I remember this was testimony given under oath in reply to cross- 
examination, and the implication would have been that I believed that 
there were Communists in the State Department; that it had been 
riddled with Communists. I don't so believe. There have been two 
to my knowledge. I don't need to elaborate on the case of Mr. Alger 
Kiss, as being well-known to all of you. I also am aware or have been 
informed that about 5 years ago an individual in a very minor position 
in the State Department was identified as a Communist, and was 
quietly disposed of, and his case is still under investigation. 

That is two. That is the score as far as I know of it. It is plural, 

Mr. Walter. I am not talking about that. I am talking about the 
further answer : "1 do." And then you went on and volunteered : 

I believe there are Communists in my own organization. 

General Smith. I do, but I cannot elaborate on those reasons in 
open session. 

Mr. Walter. You have screened everybody in your organization; 
have you not ? 

General Smith. We have, indeed; as I did elaborate further to the 
press, I have found nobody, no Communists or no penetrations in my 

J Deposition in Civil Action 1335 — 52, Senator Joseph R. McCarthy v. Senator William 
Benton, taken September 29, 1952, Washington, D. C. 


own organization in the United States, no Americans, and none within 
the authority or scope of responsibility of this committee. 

Mr. Walter. Well, now, General, in that regard I would like to 
call your attention to the fact that we have given to your organiza- 
tion free access to the files of our committee. 

General Smith. Indeed you have. 

Mr. Walter. And when you made this statement, it disturbed all 
of us, because we don't let just anybody look at our files, and more than 
that, I was disturbed because I happen to be chairman of the Immi- 
gration Committee, and in that position I have cooperated with your 
organization on many occasions, and you know what I am talking 

So I think that we are entitled to know why you stated under oath: 

I believe there are Communists in my own organization. 

General Smith. Certainly, Congressman, I will reply in this way : 

I believe so because in the past we have from time to time discov- 
ered one or two, and I believe that in the future we will from time to 
time discover them, but as I said, none in the United States, no Ameri- 
cans, and none within the scope of interest or responsibility of this 

You will remember, please, that I have no responsibility inside the 
United States, and no internal security responsibility in the United 
States, and am prohibited by law from exercising any of those func- 
tions. I trust that you will not ask me to elaborate further in open 
hearing about it, and I would be extremely happy to elaborate at con- 
siderable extent if you will go into executive session later. 

Mr. Walter. So that, as far as you know, there are no Communists 
in your organization in the United States? 

General Smith. Indeed, yes, Congressman; and I believe, since 
this thing has been exaggerated, it might be profitable to the commit- 
tee, with which as you know we have worked closely in the past, to tell 
you how we screen our own personnel. It is rather interesting. 

Mr. Wood. I believe the committee would be interested to know that 
at this point, General, it you doivt mind pursuing the subject to de- 
veloping it a little further for us. 

General Smith. Yes, indeed. 

Mr. Wood. Proceed. 

General Smith. I went over it very carefully, myself. The figures 
are rather illuminating. 

Of the applications which we receive, and I will have to talk to you 
on the basis of percentages, 80 percent are screened out by our per- 
sonnel people. Let us take the arbitrary figure of 1,000. Of every 
1,000 applications, 80 percent or a little more are eliminated by our 
personnel people. The remaining 20 percent are turned over to our 
security agencies for investigation, my own, and the Federal Bureau 
of Investigation. 

Of the remaining 20 percent, 11 percent are eliminated as a result 
of security investigations. That does not mean that the individuals 
themselves are suspects. It does mean that security considerations 
of one kind or another are considered and they include a very wide 
spectrum, from those individuals Avho may have relatives behind the 
iron curtain and who are thus susceptible to pressure, to those indi- 
viduals who may drink a little bit, or talk a little bit. Eleven percent 


arc screened out, and of that 11 percent I percent are screened out for 
really genuine security reasons, that is, people who have contacts 
which we consider render them undesirable for ;i sensif Lve service. 

You can see what the residue is. Those are the people t hat we em- 
ploy. 1 should like to emphasize, however, t hal one of the penalties of 
serving with an agency of this kind is that yon are never cleared. You 
recognize when yon join ns that yon are constantly going to be under 
invest igat ion, and that you are never relieved of suspicion, even though 
it be only suspicion of possible indiscretion. 

With that very careful screening, we feel that we are relatively 
pretty thoroughly secure in the United States. Since our responsi- 
bilities are outside of the United States, we do not there enjoy that 
security. There is only one organization or two among the security 
agencies of Government which is happily in that position. I should 
say the FBI is almost entirely penetration proof. They employ only 
Americans and they operate only in the United States. 

Mr. Velde. General, let me say that I do appreciate that last state- 
ment you made. I am a former FBI agent myself. I appreciate very 
much the sensitive position that you are in at the present time, and I 
do believe that you are doing a remarkable job in screening the Com- 
munists and other subversives from your own organization as well 
as the work you do in combating world-wide espionage. I would 
like to ask you relative to the Presidential edict which prevents you 
from giving any of your files or information to any Member of Con- 
gress or any congressional committee without the President's ap- 
proval — how do yon construe that? 

General Smith. That applies only to direct loyalty investigations. 
The Presidential edict is that if in a direct loyalty investigation of an 
individual or in connection therewith, subpena should be issued for 
records or files, it would be referred to the President who, presum- 
ably if it were justified, would authorize the proper authorities to be 
shown the files. A case has recently arisen of suspicion of an indi- 
vidual in my own agency, Senator McCarran's committee was inter- 
ested in. 

Mr. Velde. Would you tell us the name of that individual at the 
present time? 

General Smith. The officer or the gentleman's name was Dr. Oda- 
renko. He has been investigated and reinvestigated so many times 
that I think he is black and blue. I was called on by a Member of 
Congress for the records in the case of Dr. Todos M. Odarenko, not 
formally, but simply by letter. 

Mr. What type of position does he hold in your office? 

General Smith. He does some scientific work in connection with 
electronics. I did not release the files. I offered to make them avail- 
able within the agency to the Member of Congress who wrote for them, 
since they are part of our securitv files, and when that was not satis- 
factorv I personally carried the files down and showed them to Sena- 
tor McCarran. That was done informally. Congressman, and I 
thought we have an obligation to that committee as well as your com- 

Mr. Velde. I certainly appreciate your cooperation in that regard, 
General. I would like to ask you whether you are acquainted with 
Colonel Allen of the Signal Corps Intelligence. 

General Smith. Not personally. 


Mr. Velde. You do know that lie has made some complaints con- 
cerning communism and Communist infiltration into the Signal Corps 
Intelligence ? 

General Smith. Yes ; I do. 

Mr. Velde. Do you happen to have a file in which Colonel Allen 
and James Webb, who I believe is a civilian employee attached to the 
Signal Corps Intelligence, with you at the present time? 

General Smith. No, Congressman ; I do not have that file with me. 
I have seen that file. 

Mr. Velde. Does our staff have that file ? 

Mr. Nixon. We have the file concerning complaints. 

General Smith. I have some notes in connection with the case. I 
have seen the file but, since it related to a problem of internal security, 
I took no action on it except to invite the attention of those authori- 
ties who are responsible for internal security to the situation which 
appeared to exist, and then proceeded again to investigate Dr. Odar- 
enko and have FBI reinvestigate him. 

Mr. Velde. As I understand it, General, this complaint by Colonel 
Allen concerned Dr. Odarenko. 

General Smith. Among a good many others. 

Mr. Velde. And Dr. Odarenko was previously attached to the 
Signal Corps Intelligence ? 

General Smith. Yes, Congressman. 

Mr. Velde. When did Dr. Odarenko become attached to your 
branch of the Intelligence ? 

General Smith. May I consult some notes? 

Mr. Velde. Yes. 

General Smith. May I read from my notes, Mr. Chairman? 

Mr. Wood. Yes. 

General Smith. Dr. Odarenko is a 25-year-old Eussian-born nat- 
uralized citizen who applied for Government employment in 1949 
and was employed by the Army. The Federal Bureau of Investiga- 
tion was requested to conduct an investigation of Dr. Odarenko and 
completed it in August of 1949. 

In October of 1949 his employment was approved and he entered 
on duty as an electronics engineer. He came to us shortly thereafter. 
On the 31st of July 1950, following our policy, he voluntarily sub- 
mitted to a polograph interview, that is, a lie-detector test, in which 
special attention was given to questions concerning any of his extra- 
curricular or Communist affiliations and similar support of or sym- 
pathies with a foreign power. The interview was favorable to the 

About this time we received information of certain anonymous 
charges which appeared to emanate from a clique of former coemploy- 
ees in the Signal Corps. I may say, parenthetically, that those charges 
emanated from one faction of a group which has been under sur- 
veillance for a considerable period of time. It is not that there was 
any suspicion of Communist affiliations, but because there was grave 
concern about the general stability of some of the individuals. 

These charges have continued sporadically from this same group 
from 1950 through January of 1952. They have been based on al- 
legations that Dr. Odarenko might be subversive or might have sub- 
versive associates. He was reinvestigated twice by our own security 


agencies and no corroborative evidence has ever been provided. How- 
ever, incident to these charter-, the Federal Bureau of* Investigation 
made a second and very complete investigation from October L950 to 
February of 1951, and again furnished a further supplemental report 
in March of 1951. 

In October of 1951 the Central Intelligence A.gency security staff 
made further investigations and the A.rmy supplemented this by de- 
tailed inquiry into their own personnel. 

In January 1952, and as a result of the four complete investigations 
and careful analysis of all information obtained, both the Cent ral In- 
telligence Agency and the Army came to the conclusion that the alle- 
gations were unfounded and were based on personal friction and ill- 
feeling developed in an interoffice feud. 

Dr. Odarenko is still in our employ, and we have seen no reason for 
terminating his employment. 

Mr. Velde. Do you feel that Dr. Odarenko is perfectly loyal as far 
as his work is concerned? 

Genera] Smith. I do, Congressman. 

Mr. Velde. And that there is nothing in his affiliations with any of 
the Communist-front groups or anything of that sort that would make 
him at this time disloyal ? 

General Smith. T do. 

Mr. Velde. I believe, of course, and I trust your opinion a great 
deal, but I do believe, Mr. Chairman, that Colonel Allen should have 
an opportunity to appear before this committee, and I don't think at 
this time thai 1 would be willing to hear him due to the fact that I am 
in a campaign, and I think a couple of others on this committee are 
in campaigns, but I do ask that before the year is over that Colonel 
Allen may have an opportunity to appear before this committee and tell 
what he knows about communism and subversives in the Signal Corps 
Intelligence, as well as the CIA. 

Mr. Wood. The committee members interrupted counsel awhile ago 
and have taken some time, and will counsel proceed now with further 
investigation of the witness? 

Mr. Tavenner. Possibly the record should be corrected to show that 
the name of the alien to whom you refer was Col. Ollie J. Allen. 

Mr. Velde. How do you spell the first name ? 

Mr. Tavenner. O-1-l-i-e. Is that correct? 

General Smith. I don't know ; as I said before. 1 glanced only at the 
copy of the report which came to my attention, and noted that one 
individual in my agency was included in a long list of allegations, and 
turned the information that I had over to those authorities who are 
responsible for internal security and then proceeded to reinvestigate 
the devoted Dr. Odarenko. 

Mr. Tavenner. General Smith, at the time the complaint was made 
against Dr. Odarenko were other persons included in the complaint 
and then later became employed in your agency? 

General Smith. Not to my knowledge. 

Mr. Tavenner. Now. Mr. Chairman. I will continue with the read- 
ing of the testimony. The last answer given by you, or the last ques- 
tion and answer, I think I should reread : 

Question. So that you believe with the Senator that there were Communists 
in the State Department cf the United States? 

Answer. I do. T believe there are Communists In my own organization. 

25242— 52 2 


Question. Do you know them? 

Answer. I do not. I wish I did. I do everything I can to detect them, but I 
am morally certain, since you are asking the question, that there are. I believe 
that they are so adroit and adept that they have infiltrated practically every 
security organization of Government in one way or another. And it is our func- 
tion to detect them where possible. 

I read further from the testimony of Senator Benton : 

There is no doubt that Communists did infiltrate in the State Department 
and this was well known in 1945? 
Question. Do you agree with that? 
Answer. I would be inclined to think it is true. 

General Smith, you were partially asked one question that I wanted 
to ask you. What is the responsibility of your agency in ascertaining 
whether or not there has been Communist infiltration in other security 
organizations of the Government, besides your own? 

General Smith. Within the United States, none. 

Mr. Tavenner. What organizations of the Government in the 
United States did you have reference to when you said : 

I believe that they are so adroit and adept that they have infiltrated practically 
every security organization of Government. 

General Smith. In a general way, and I do not wish to be specific in 
open hearing, those organizations of Government which have func- 
tions similar to my own, that is, the collection of information, the 
intelligence agencies of Government, with the one exception, as I pre- 
viously stated, of the FBI. That does not have to employ foreigners, 
and it can exclusively operate within the United States. 

Mr. Velde. General, may I interrupt you, I am not quite clear, Are 
there any other organizations besides your own attached to the United 
States Government which investigate or collect information outside 
of the United States? 

General Smith. Yes, sir ; the Army, the Navy, the Air Force, and 
various others. They are vitally concerned with information of cer- 
tain kinds outside the United States. 

Mr. Velde. They are not in your jurisdiction? 

General Smith. They are subject to my general coordination, and 
they are responsible, as I am, however, for their own internal security 
and are as vulnerable as I am outside the United States to certain types 
of penetration, and please remember that when I refer to penetration 
I am referring to espionage, that is to a spy or an agent of the Soviet 
Government or of one of the governments associated therewith, who 
in one way or the other, and it does not have to be on a high level, 
worms his way into an organization for the purpose of collecting 

Mr. Wood. Proceed with your answer. 

General Smith. That concludes it, I think, sir. 

Mr. Wood. I thought you were interrupted. 

General Smith. Does that answer your question, sir? 

Mr. Tavenner. Not entirely, sir. You have talked about Govern- 
ment security agencies abroad, but your statement as recorded in the 
transcript of the testimony did not limit it, limit your answer to 
security agencies abroad. Your testimony was [reading] : 

I believe they are so adroit and adept that they have infiltrated practically 
every security organization of Government. 


Now, I would like to know what security organizations <>i' Govern- 
ment within the United States you had reference to, specifically. 

General Smith. None. My responsibilities arc all abroad, and my 
knowledge is restricted to what goes on abroad. 

Mr. Tavenner. But that is not what you said in your testimony, 
and you did not limit it to activities abroad, and so as the testimony 
stands on the record it is an indict mcnt of every security Government 
agency in the land, or every Government securitv organization in the 

General Smith. I did not delimit it. Mr. Counsel, and I don't think 
that it should be taken as an indictment by anybody who is familiar 
with the law and with the limitations of my own responsibility. 
Those are very clear. 

Mr. Walter. We are familial- with the law, but what we want to 
know is what you meant when you made this very plain statement. 

General Smith. Exactly that. 

Mr. Walter. And more than that, I would like to know whether 
or not you felt that there had been a penetration into this committee. 

General Smith. I meant exactly what I said, Congressman. 

Mr. Walter. You said that they have infiltrated practically every 
security organization of the Government in one way or another. 

General Smith. That is exactly what I meant. I have made certain 
exceptions, but remember, please, that when I talk, I talk about the 
operations with which I am familiar. 

Mr. Walter. Well, one day, but then on another day you talk about 
something else. 

General Smith. I answered a question, Mr. Chairman, and Mr. 
Congressman, and I answered it to the best of my ability and elabo- 
rated as rapidly as I could. 

Mr. Walter. Well, on the 29th of September, you said one thing, 
and on the 30th you said something else. What you said on the 29th 
stirred this committee, for the reasons I have already given you. Xow, 
as I understand your testimony, you base this statement [reading] : 

I believe tbere are Communists in my own organization ; there are Communists 
in the State Department — 

on the fact that you know of two Communists in the State Depart- 
ment, and you don't know of one in your organization in the United 
States, and that is the basis for this statement '. 

General Smith. Have I allayed your disturbance? 

Mr. Walter. You haven't allayed my disturbance. I am disturbed 
because you happen to be occupying the position you are occupying, 
General, to be brutally and perfectly frank. 

Mr. Wood. Any further questions? 

Mr. Tavenner. May I put the question this way: What basis did 
you have for stating that the Communists had infiltrated every secu- 
rity organization of Government in one way or another? 

Qeneral Smith. I think that it is inevitable that in one way or an- 
other at some time or another there must be a penetration within prac- 
tically all of our security agencies who are obliged to deal with people 
of a certain type. 

You are asking me to go into methods which I would be happy to 
do in a closed session, but aside from that all I can say is that I have 
observed what they have been able to do elsewhere, and I am conscious 


and I know what they have been able to do in the past, let us say, in 
Canada, in the United States itself, as you will note from the records 
of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in Japan, and in Germany. 

Those two latter countries were once where the security police did 
not operate under the limitations of law and decency and regard for 
human rights that we do in this country, and yet they were pheno- 
menally successful, and so it would be very foolish and very fatuous 
of us to assume that somewhere we do not have a penetration. I be- 
lieve that all of my colleagues in the intelligence community so assume 
and so act. 

Mr. Walter. That is exactly what you meant on the 29th of Septem- 
ber, and you assumed and presumed that there had been an infiltra- 
tion and that was merely an assumption based on nothing more than 
the history of the past. 

General Smitjt. A little more than that. 

Mr. Walter. Plus the two cases that you know of in the State 

General Smith. A little more than that. As I have told you, Con- 
gressman, we have turned up abroad people within our own organiza- 
tion, and there are other organizations like my own which operate 
abroad and which operate under the same difficulties, and the same 
limitations, and which are obliged to employ the same type of 

Mr. Velde. As far as I am concerned, I am going to assume just 
like you do, because I know that from the past there have been infiltra- 
tions into the various security services. You take the OSS, for in- 
stance, I don't know whether you heard of Sterling Hayden or not. 

General Smith. Indeed I have. 

Mr. Velde. Sterling Hayden came before this committee, and he 
testified that he was a member of the Communist Party, at the time he 
was in the OSS, and certainly we can assume that if a gentleman of 
that standing would come in and say that he was a member of the 
Communist Party, that there are others, too, who have been in the 
services, and who will attempt to get into the services in the future, 
and I thoroughly agree with General Smith in his statement. 

General Smith. May I make a perfectly gratuitous statement at this 
point ? 

Mr. Wood. Yes, sir ; we would be delighted to have it. 

General Smith. I am not political, and I have no political affilia- 
tions, and I have no political leanings. I am conscious of the fact 
that this, perfectly honest, to my mind, statement made under oath, 
and under very limited conditions, has been at certain levels used 
politically. Now, I would like to say this: Any future President, 
Democratic or Republican, is going to have to work with the same 
agencies that are now engaged in the problem of eliminating the 
Communist menace. Any future administration, Democratic or 
Republican, is going to encounter the same difficulties. 

I know both the Presidential candidates and I have the most pro- 
found respect for the integrity and character and ability of both of 
them. If either one of them does as well as President Truman has 
done in supporting and encouraging the activities of the security 
agencies of this Government, then the American people will be able 
to congratulate themselves and will have nothing: to worry about. 


Mr. Wood. I appreciate that statement, and the sentimenl behind it. 
I hope, also, that you may be cognizant of the wry deep concern the 
members of this committer fell when they read in the press the state- 
ment attributed to you to the effect thai to your knowledge, practically 
every agency of this Government had been infill rated by ( lommunists 
and their agents. I understand now, from what you say here, that 
when you made those statements that, for instance : 

I would agree that there are Communists in the State Department — 

you predicate that on the two instances that you detailed to this 

Genera] Smith. I certainly know of two, Mr. Chairman, and it will 
be inevitable that in the years to come from time to < ime at some levels 
they will he picked up, one or another, because we have a Long pull 
ahead of us. 

Mr. "Wood. I don't think that that statement was so disturbing as 
the further statement that — 

I helieve there are Communists in my own organization. 

and that is a direct quote from your testimony. That statement did 
not seek to limit what it embraced to the United States alone, and it 
just said: 

I helieve there are Communists in my own organization. 

That was a most disturbing statement to me. I understand now 
that you say, and it is your contention, that that is what you intended 
to convey then, that you knew of none in the United States but that 
you believed there were some at other places; is that correct? 

General Smith. Well, you know what my organization is, Mr. 
Chairman, and you and the members of your committee are expe- 
rienced and knowledgeable in this matter, and you have dealt with us 
for a long time, and you know what our purpose is, and you know how 
we operate, and you know what our objectives are. 

Mr. Wood. I understand, sir, but you did not undertake to limit it, 
notwithstanding the fact that your organization operates only in for- 
eign fields, many of your personnel are in the United States, and are 
United States citizens. 

General Smith. Yes. 

Mr. Wood. And don't you agree now that it would be a disturbing 
thing if the American people were to become convinced of the fact 
that you yourself believed that right here in our midst that your organ- 
ization is infiltrated with Communists, and wouldn't it be a disturbing 
sort of situation? 

General Smith. Yes, indeed it would ; and that is one of the rea- 
sons why I was glad to come here today. In justice to myself, now, 
you must recall that immediately after this hearing, to those members 
of the press who wished to remain, this was pretty thoroughly ex- 
plained. One or two did not wish to remain and left. Immediately 
afterward, the following day, as a matter of fact, I got a group of 
editors, owners, and so forth, and amplified it pretty thoroughly. 
Regrettably, not all of that amplification was published, because, as 
the President wrote me. this is a political year and he understood that 
it is inevitable that any statement by a member of the administration 
is going to be taken out of context and exploited for political pur- 
poses. Many of the things that I have told you today have been given 


publicly but have not been printed. That is why I would like to get 
this record straight. 

Mr. Velde. General 

Mr. Wood. I would like to ask you one further question. Categori- 
cally, General Smith, now in clarification of that portion of your an- 
swer as to whether or not you know of any Communists in your own 
organization, in which you state that they are so adroit and adept that 
they have infiltrated practically every security agency of the Govern- 
ment in one way or another — categorically, do you now say that you 
don't know of any security organization in America that has a Com- 
munist in it today, or that you do ? 

General Smith. That has one today? 

Mr. Wood. Yes. 

General Smith. Categorically, no; because if I did, I would put 
my finger on him instantly, and he would be eliminated. But I would 
certainly, Mr. Chairman, be foolishly complacent if I acted on any 
other assumption than that some were there. 

Mr. Wood. I understand, vigilance, eternal vigilance is the only 
hope we have of security anyway in a democracy, but by stating that, 
that you believe they are so adroit and adept that they have infil- 
trated practically every security agency of the Government, do you 
now say that you had no basis for that belief or that you believe it 
because of the fact that you think they are as smart as we are and can 
get into the organizations without being known ? Now, which do you 
base it on ? 

General Smith. You know, sir, tha*, we have from time to time 
discovered them. 

Mr. Wood. Yes. 

General Smith. And I from time to time discover them in my own 
activities in various places, which I would prefer not to discuss in 
open hearing. While we constantly work to perfect our defensive 
mechanism, it is inevitable that we will continue from time to time 
to discover them, and I cannot categorically say that there are none. 
My assumption would be that somewhere in some level there probably 
is an agent. 

Mr. Wood. That is the basis for your statement then that you be- 
lieve that they are so adroit that they have infiltrated every security 
agency ? 

General Smith. That is one. 

Mr. Wood. Is that all? 

General Smith. The other is observation of what they have done 
and what they are doing elsewhere. That is with friendly govern- 
ments and abroad. What they can do for instance in Japan and under 
the Japanese thought control and secret police system, and what they 
could do in Germany under the Nazi system of police control, they 
undoubtedly will be able to do elsewhere. 

Mr. Wood. All right, sir, then do I understand that your statement : 

I believe that they are so adroit they have been able to infiltrate — 

is predicated on pure theory ? 

General Smith. No; it is predicated upon pure theory and past 

Mr. Wood. Take them both, does that cover it? 


General Smith. Thai covers it, yes; because certainly as I have 

said, ii* I knew where there was one specifically today, I would cer- 
tainly produce him. 

Mr. Velde. Mr. Chairman, if we today here have taken just one 

term out of context, that is one answer thai General Smith made in 
his deposition, that is, when he was asked: 

So you believe with the Senator thai there were Communists in the State 
Department of the United States? 

and the answer was : 

I do. I believe there are Communists in my own organization. 

And now we have just questioned the general on that one statement, 
lint right in the deposition he goes on to say. after a question was 
asked : 

Do you know them ? 

I do not. I wish I did. I do everything I can to detect them. But I am 
morally certain that there are. 

Certainly that should explain the statement that he believes that 
there are Communists in his own organization. 1 just wanted to add 
that to make the record clear. 

General Smith. Thank you very much, Congressman. Thai is a 
correct statement, and 1 said that I was morally certain that there 

Mr. Wood. Do you have any reasons on which you base that state- 
ment other than those you have given? 

General Smith. I do not. 

Mr. Wood. Proceed. 

Mr. Tavenner. General Smith, you mentioned the fact that there 
were two members of the Communist Party within the State Depart- 
ment and one of them was Hiss, who was the other? 

Genera] Smith. As I told you, I was informed by an officer of t In- 
state Department that there was one in a minor position, and I know 
nothing of the name, and if I did 1 couldn't tell you because as 1 told 
you the case is still under investigation. 

Mr. Tavenner. In the course of your statement of September 30, 
you show that the functioning of your agency is made as secure as 
possible by compartmentalization of the work. To quote you : 

So that no single individual below the very top level is able to gain the whole 
picture, even though he may obtain part of it. 

Do you have a section of your agency known as the Evaluation 
Section which evaluates the information received, and if so, do you 
consider it to be the top-level group that you referred to here in this 

Genera] Smith. No; I have no such section. 

Mr. Tavenner. Do you consider those who perform that type of 
work to be the top-level persons referred to in your statement \ 

General Smith. Please tell me what you mean by "evaluation." 

Mr. Tavenner. Persons who would evaluate information which you 
received. Under the provisions of the act creating the Central In- 
telligence Agency it is provided that it shall be the duty of t he A.gency, 
under the direction of the Xat tonal Security Council, to correlate and 
evaluate intelligence relating to national security. Now, I am speak- 
ing of the 1 function of evaluating that in format ion. 


General Smith. I will have to go into a little detail and then ask 
the chairman to tell me just which of the phases of evaluation you 
are interested in. 

There are, as some of you may know, two sorts of evaluation : First is 
the evaluation of the source and authenticity of information. That 
is done by people who secure it, and I don't know myself what the 
sources of information are, and it is done on a code basis. But let 
us take, for example, what I am now saying to you, if I am speaking 
about the Central Intelligence Agency, and using a hypothetical code, 
it would be evaluated let us say as X-100. That means that it was 
said by a responsible official who was in charge that it was not a docu- 
ment but that it was a statement which had the authenticity of a 
document. Beyond that, only the source and the person who receives 
it and who deals with the source knows who the individual is and 
what type it is. 

There is another form of evaluation which means in fact the assess- 
ment of all of the information which flows into Government and the 
boiling of it down into estimates of what may be the most probable 
intensions or the capabilities of our enemies. That is done by a com- 
mittee which consists of the heads of all of the intelligence services 
of the Government acting under my chairmanship. 

That, I believe, is the evaluation function, the way we carry out the 
evaluation function which you read there. Yes; that is on the top 

Mr. Tavenner. I have no further questions, Mr. Chairman. 

Mr. Wood. Mr. Doyle, do you have any questions ? 

Mr. Doyle. General, in your statement of September 30 I think that 
you said that this is not to reflect on the loyalty of our employees or to 
suggest that any of our security agencies are riddled with Communists, 
as has been alleged from time to time. In using that term "riddled," 
as you did in your statement of September 30, are we to understand 
that even in your own organization, to which you referred, which is 
the only organization, as I understand it now, that you referred to in 
the deposition when you said that no doubt there were Communists in 
your own organization. Do you mean that your own organization is 
now or ever was riddled in, your judgment, with Communists? 

General Smith. No, Congressman. I thought that I had made that 
very clear. 

Mr. Doyle. Do you now know of any Government organization of 
the United States Government which is riddled with Communists? 

General Smith. I thought that that statement stood pretty well 
by itself. 

Mr. Doyle. Well, I thought it did, too, but you would be surprised 
out in California where I live, certain newspapers capitalized upon 
your statement here in the deposition hearing, and they didn't hesitate 
to, some of them incorrectly, quote you as saying that Government 
agencies were riddled with Communists. 

General Smith. I don't suppose there is a gentleman on this plat- 
form who hasn't been pretty incorrectly quoted at some time or other. 

Mr. Doyle. That is correct. We are used to it. 

General Smith. But since you want — and I appreciate it very 
much — since you want to set such a record straight, as I indeed do, too, 
of course not. It would be ridiculous to assume that they are. I have 


told you what I know about the Si ale Department. I have known of 
two (here, one directly and one indirectly, and I think that that is a 
pretty good score. 

Mr. Doyle. Now, let me pinpoint this question, ( reneral : Do I under- 
stand then that when you stated in your deposition hearing 

There is no doubt that Communists did Infiltrate In the State Department 

and this was well known in 1945 

do I understand that the number of Communists you knew of in the 
State Department when you gave this testimony was the Hi>s ease 
and one other, and thai is all '. 

General Smith. T think that you have read Mr. Benton's statement 
as my own, have you not \ Would you mind clearing that up? 

Mr. Doyle. I see. That is Mr. Benton's statement, but in answer 
to a question 

General Smith. I said I would be inclined to believe it. Mr. Benton 
said it, and he was Assistant Secretary of State, and I would not be 
inclined to disbelieve him. I was testifying in the interest of Senator 

Mr. Doyle. May I say, preliminary to this one further question, 
out in California your statement was publicly seized. There were 
big head lines in certain newspapers, and some of them 3 or 4 inches 
in height, the print. 

General Smith. They always do things well in California. 

Mr. Doyle. Manifestly for political purposes but nevertheless after 
that occurred, I, as a member of tin committee, the Un-American 
Activities Committee, was asked very frankly whether or not you 
referred to the Un-American Activities Committee staff of investiga- 
tors as possibly an area of Government organization in which there 
had been infiltration. 

(reneral Smith. I hope you repudiated the allegation. 

Mr. Doyle. Well, of course I did not know what you referred to. 
very frankly, because I read your statement and it said that prac- 
tically every security organization in Government was involved. 

Mr. Velde. Are we a security organization? 

Mr. Doyle. While I recognize this committee is not a security or- 
ganization, I will say to you that generally speaking I think that the 
American people don't differentiate very much between a security 
organization of Government and the functioning of this committee. 
That is my experience. They don't differentiate between the staff of 
this committee and the staff of the CIA, your organization, or Hoover's 
organization, or any of them. They figure them all as responsible 
for this load of investigating. 

Now, merely that the record will be straight, and so that the people 
out West will understand that you did not refer to or have in mind 
any connection with the Un-American Activities Committee, directly 
or indirectly, may I ask you if you did ] 

General Smith. No. Congressman. I was referring to what within 
the limit of my own definition mean- security agency, that is, those 
which are directly concerned with gathering information and prevent- 
ing counterespionage. So I did not directly refer to you. I won't 
give you absolution; you are responsible for your own internal 


Mr. Doyle. That is correct, and, of course, when you gave that 
testimony, according to your answers to our distinguished chairman 
and our counsel, you only referred to areas outside the United States, 
of which you have knowledge. 

General Smith. In general, yes. 

Mr. Doyle. I think that is all, Mr. Chairman. 

Mr. Wood. Are there any further questions ? 

Mr. Velde. I just wanted to make one point clear. 

General, you previously referred to the President's Executive order 
and also stated that you would be willing to testify before this com- 
mittee in closed session. I hope that that will be a continuing overture, 
but I doubt very much whether the committee can handle it in the 
near future in view of the fact that there are a number of other wit- 
nesses called, but could you tell us generally to what you were refer- 
ring, that couldn't be testified to in open session, but could be testified 
to in closed session, without mentioning any names? 

General Smith. Yes. I am very glad to do so. As you are aware, 
the National Security Act of 1947 prohibits me from disclosing the 
methods of my agency or its sources to any unauthorized persons. 
This committee is not an unauthorized group, in my own estimate, and 
the McCarran committee, and as long as I remain in office I will con- 
tinue to do that, If I were testifying in executive session, I would 
give you specific reasons why I believe some of the things I believe, 
and possibly convince Representative Walter that they are not too 
far-fetched, but I cannot do that in open session. If the committee 
really wants information which will bear out my beliefs, then I shall 
be happy to give it, but only in executive session. 

Mr. Velde. Thank you. That is all I have. 

Mr. Wood. Are there any further questions ? 

Mr. Tavenner. I have no further questions. 

Mr. Wood. Is there any reason why the witness should not be ex- 
cused in attendance on this committee unless later called, in executive 

Mr. Tavenner. No, sir. 

Mr. Wood. Thank you very much, General. If the committee 
should meet at some later date, which it probably will, to hear you 
in executive session, we will arrange to do that in the city of Wash- 

General Smith. Yes. I would be very glad to do that. 

Mr. Wood. You are excused. 

The committee will stand in recess for 10 minutes. 

(Whereupon a recess was taken, following which the committee 
continued the hearing on another phase of its investigation — Com- 
munist activities in the Philadelphia area.) 


3 ■IJillllflll 

3 9999 05706 2059 


3 9999 05706 2067 


3 9999 06350 336 9