"%
&
1
THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
OF ST. BENEDICT
VOLUME THE FIRST
THE
ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
OF ST. BENEDICT
A SKETCH OF THEIR HISTORY FROM THE
COMING OF ST. AUGUSTINE TO
THE PRESENT DAY
REV. ETHELRED L. TAUNTON
IN TWO VOLUMES
VOLUME THE FIRST
LONDON
JOHN C. NIMMO
NEW YORK : LONGMANS, GREEN, & CO.
MDCCCXCVII
Printed by Ballantyne, Hanson & Co.
At the Ballantyne Press
TO
MY
DEAR FATHER,
IN REMEMBRANCE OF
THE
COMMON
OF
SORROW
February 13,
1897.
INTRODUCTION
In these two volumes I venture to bring before
the notice of English readers the history of the
English benedictines, or "black monks," as they
were called in the olden times. To the student the
names are well known of men who have devoted
large and costly books to the past glories of the
monks of this country. These works, however, are
difficult of access ; and from their very multiplicity of
detail, require a mastery of the subject (to be gained
only by long and patient study), before a just and
general idea of the history as a whole can be ob-
tained. Besides, such works as the Monasticon of
Dugdale, and others of the school of antiquaries
connected with his labours, professedly deal only
with the black monks, among other orders, up to
the dissolution of the monasteries under Henry
VIII. Their subsequent history, known but to a
very few even of their descendants, has in course
of time become obscured by a legendary growth
which does not bear the test of research. It is as
viii INTRODUCTION
an attempt at completing in broad lines the picture
of English benedictine history, both ancient and
modern, that these pages have been written. The
vastness and importance of the subject would
require many volumes to treat it adequately, and
would be a task beyond my present purpose. But
here for the first time is given a definite account of
the history, for the last thirteen hundred years, of
men who have played no mean part in the making
of England, and whose names have ever been re-
vered and cherished.
Writers on the later history, whether in manu-
script or otherwise, have drawn their information
mainly from the Chronicles of Dom Weldon, a
choir brother of St. Edmund's, Paris. That he was
often misinformed and also did not understand the
nature of the documents he had in hand is a con-
clusion one is bound to arrive at when his statements
are brought to the test. In the present work, I
have contented myself (with two most important
exceptions noted below) with going to the first-hand
evidence contained in the wealth of printed and
manuscript material at the disposal of the public ;
and I feel sure that any further light to be obtained
from private sources will only go to illustrate, not to
INTRODUCTION ix
alter, the lines here given. Every statement has
been verified, and every reference has been given.
My grateful thanks are due to the many friends
who have helped me in what has been a work of
love. It is also a tribute of the affection and esteem
which I, an outsider, have for the English monks.
But I cannot let these pages go forth without a
special acknowledgment of my sincere gratitude
to the Very Rev. Dom Anselm Burge, O.S.B.,
prior of St. Laurence's monastery, Ampleforth, for
giving me full access to Dom Allanson's voluminous
manuscripts ; and to Mr. Edmund Bishop for allow-
ing me the free use of his manuscript collections
relating to the English benedictines of the middle
ages. From these latter I have selected, as most
proper for my purpose, the consuetudinary of St.
Augustine's, Canterbury, contained in the Cotton MS.
Faustina C. xii., the transcript of which (completed,
as the date tells me, just five-and-twenty years ago)
has served me for the appendix to the present volume.
This document has the further recommendation of
having been hitherto practically overlooked by the
ecclesiastical antiquaries.
E. L. T.
London, August 6, 1897.
CONTENTS
VOLUME THE FIRST
CHAPTER I
THE COMING OF THE MONKS
PAGES
The vision of St. Benedict— He destined to be "The Father of
many Nations " — The growth and influence of the benedictine
monks and what England owes to them — The landing of
Augustine and his companions — His instructions from Gregory
the Great — His institutions — The attitude of the remnants of
the British church to him — The acknowledgment of his plan
by Irish and Scottish monks — The growth of monastic institu-
tions in England — Wilfrid and Benet Biscop — Bede the
Venerable — The Danish invasion and destruction of the
Saxon abbeys — The restoration of religious houses and of
civilisation by the monks — Archbishop Dunstan and bishops
Ethelwold and Oswald : their work as restorers and their in-
stitutions— The daily life of the monks under the Concordia
Regularis of Ethelwold 1-17
CHAPTER II
THE NORMAN LANFRANC
The growth of the Anglo-Saxon church : its second devastation —
The Norman invasion — Lay abbats and the disorders they pro-
voked— The confederation of Cluni and the character and
growth of the cluniacs— The Italian Lanfranc : he becomes
prior of Bee — William of Malmesbury's account of the Christ
Church monks in the eleventh century — The Norman attitude
xii CONTENTS
PAGES
to the Saxon monasteries and how far it was justifiable — Lan-
franc as archbishop of Canterbury : his reforms and statutes :
the spread of his changes and their unwelcomeness to the Saxon
monks — The incoming of the cluniacs and their settlements in
England — The growth of monasticism coeval with the growth
of chivalry — Bishop William of St. Carileph and his founda-
tions— The development of constitutional organisation . . 18-30
CHAPTER III
THE BENEDICTINE CONSTITUTION
The nature of the benedictine constitution : the absence from it
of the forms of government and special objects peculiar to
other orders : its aims and vows : the resemblance of its basis
to the family basis of society — Lanfranc's definition of St.
Benedict's Rule — The autonomy of the individual houses and
their mutual confederation — The embodiment of this principle
in the twelfth decree of the Fourth General Council of Lateran
— Instances of the observance of the decree in England — The
decree enforced by a bull of Benedict XII. — The observance of
the bull in England and the holding of chapters — Clement VL's
modifications of the bull of Benedict XII. — The secession of
Christ Church, Canterbury, from the general chapter — The
bishop's jurisdiction over the abbats of his diocese — English
abbeys which were exempt from episcopal control — The in-
ternal government of the abbeys — The benedictine's freedom
from peculiar outside work and his consequent power to take
up any work 31-48
CHAPTER IV
THE MONK IN THE WORLD
The monk's readiness to labour in the world : his social status and
his relation to agricultural industries — The means of livelihood
afforded to artisans by the monastic institutions — The monk
as an educationalist — The benedictine school foundations —
The relief of the poor at the religious houses and the manner
in which they were relieved — The spiritual supervision of the
CONTENTS xiii
people by the monks — The monks the originators of the
present parochial system — The origin of vicars — The impro-
priation and appropriation of benefices in England and the
proportion of income reserved to the vicar : English legislation
in the matter — The position of the secular clergy — The monas-
teries as schools for the sons of the nobility — The admission of
the greatest of the land to confraternity with the monks —
The privileges of the confrater and the ceremony of admis-
sion— Kings and princes as confratres — The disadvantages
of the monasteries being shelters for the rich as well as
poor — Enforced endowments to scholars nominated by the
king— The possessions of the monks weighed against their
responsibilities 49-64
CHAPTER V
THE MONK IN HIS MONASTERY
The private life of the monks : its calmness and freedom from
incident — The combination of the broad outlines of mediaeval
English life necessary to form a picture of the inner life of the
monks — The true history of a monk of the thirteenth century
presented in the imaginary history of John Weston of Lyn-
minster — His parentage and education — His dedication to God
and his preparation for the monastic life — The attention paid
to his physical development — The awakening of his soul — His
admission as a novice and his training in the spiritual life
— His trial and duties in the year of his novitiate — He becomes
a monk — The devotions of the day — The day's meals and what
they consisted of — The day's studies — The day's work — The
sleeping-house and its arrangement — The monk's recreation
and exercise — The foundation of Gloucester Hall, Oxford,
by John Gifford, and its incentive to the higher education of
the monks — The building of chambers by the abbeys for their
own students — John Weston goes to Oxford — His daily life
there — His return to Lynminster and his ordination — He
teaches the novices — The internal government of the abbey
— He becomes prior — He takes the plague — His death and
burial 65-96
xiv CONTENTS
CHAPTER VI
WOMEN UNDER THE RULE
PAGES
The uncertainty as to St. Scholastica being a nun — The tradition
of St. Benedict founding a community of virgins — The absence
of any reference to this in his Rule — The reasons for the sup-
position— The existence of cloisters of women before St.
Benedict's time proved — Reasons for supposing that the early
English convents were benedictine — Noble foundresses of
Saxon convents, Hilda, Eanswith, Ethelburga, Sexburgh, Mil-
dred— Other Saxon nunneries — Ethelburga's abbey at Barking
— Cuthburg's foundation at Wimborne — The destruction
of the nunneries during the Danish invasion — The convents
which survived the invasion — The privileges of abbesses —
The life of the benedictine nuns and their partial freedom from
the enclosure restrictions of other orders — The nun in Chaucer
— The employments of the nuns in their convents — Study
and intellectual pursuits their favourite employment — Needle-
work also practised — Other pursuits — The convent as a place
of retreat for lay women — The influences and tendencies of
convent life — The social influence of the nuns . . 97-116
CHAPTER VII
CHRONICLES OF THE CONGREGATION. I
The state of the monasteries before their fall — The influence of the
abbats compared with that of the bishops — Their mutual rela-
tions— An instance of the disputes between monastic chapters
and their bishops — St. Edmund and the monks of Christ
Church, Canterbury — The character of Edmund — The appeal
of the monks to pope Gregory IX. — The papal judges— Inter-
vention of the king — Edmund gives way — Other disputes —
Edmund goes to Rome and his dispute with the Canterbury
monks is renewed — His return to England — He excommuni-
cates the Canterbury chapter — The reforms of the Lateran
Council — The legate Otho and the black monks — His legisla-
tion— The alien priories and their origination — The revenues
CONTENTS xv
estreated by King John — Seizure of the priories by Edward I. :
legislation affecting them : their total suppression by Henry V.
— The "Black Death" of 1348-49: the terrible effects of the
visitation : was mainly responsible for the break-up of the
feudal system : its effect upon the monasteries — The conference
of Henry V. with the abbats and other prelates in 1422 — The
king's address — The deliberations of the conference — The
nature of its decrees — Their effects — The state of benedic-
tinism on the continent before the dissolution — The cause of
the decline there attributable to the system of commendam —
The system arrested by the reforms of Barbo of Padua — Their
spread and efficacy 1 17-142
CHAPTER VIII
THE DOWNFALL
The dissolution of the monasteries — The outcome of the trend of
events prior to the reign of Henry VIII. — The unpopularity
of the monasteries with the court — Henry's accession and
Wolsey's rise to power — The pope's authorisations to Wolsey
as legate — He suppresses thirty monasteries — The cardinal's
agents — Allen and Thomas Cromwell — The fall of Wolsey and
the elevation of Thomas Cromwell — Henry's avarice aroused :
his want of money — Cromwell authorised to visit the monas-
teries— The nature of the oath tendered by his commissioners
— Royal commission instituted : its powers and object — The
worthlessness of the commissioners' reports : their endorsement
by the king — The act of dissolution passed by Parliament —
The monasteries given to the king in trust only : the enact-
ments relating to this — The people reconciled by public
declarations — Appointment of the "court of Augmentations"
— The houses suppressed and the value of their lands and
personal goods — The exception of some houses and the found-
ing of two new ones by the king— The Lincolnshire risings
and the king's merciless suppression of them — Further seizures
and surrenderings of houses — Three abbats hanged for high
treason — The downfall 143-159
VOL. I.
xvi CONTENTS
CHAPTER IX
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT
PAGES
The state of the monks immediately after the dissolution — The
influx of monks to the monastic colleges at the universities —
John Fecknam of Evesham— His birth, parentage, and early-
education — He is sent by the benedictines to Oxford — His
return to Oxford after the suppression — Abbat Clement Lich-
field of Evesham — Fecknam becomes chaplain to the bishop
of Worcester : and to the bishop of London — He is presented
to the living of Solihull — His imprisonment in the Tower —
The reasons for his committal — He is " borrowed " from prison
to hold disputations — Returns to the Tower — Is released and
returns to the bishop of London — He becomes rector of Green-
ford Magna — Is made chaplain and confessor to Mary and
dean of St. Paul's — He intercedes for Lady Jane Dudley and
for the princess Elizabeth — Assists Mary in her attempt to
restore the Catholic Church — The mass restored at Canter-
bury— The benedictines resume their habits — Renunciation
of abbey lands by the queen — Restoration of Westminster
abbey — Pole introduces Cassinese ideas — Fecknam appointed
abbat — His installation — He receives the mitre — The queen's
visit — Fecknam's hospitality — He attends Parliament — His
endeavours to restore other monasteries — The petition of the
Glastonbury monks — Death of Mary and of cardinal Pole
— The accession of Elizabeth — Her political hostility to the
catholics — The opening of Parliament and its enactions — The
act of the Royal Supremacy passed — The suppression of all
religious houses decided upon — The second dissolution of
Westminster abbey — The deprivation of the bishops — Feck-
nam's refusal to take the oath and his ejection — His imprison-
ment together with the bishops — His life in the Tower — The
penalty of death decreed for a second refusal of the oath —
Fecknam committed to the care of the bishop of Winches-
ter— Recommitted to the Tower — He justifies his refusal —
His treatment in the Tower — Removed to the Marshalsea —
Released on parole — He engages in charitable works — De-
nounced for abusing his parole — Placed under the charge of
the bishop of Ely — The regulations for the bishop's treatment
of him — His so-called confession — His removal to Wisbeach
Castle — His death — Personal appearance — Bequests and sur-
viving MS. works 160-222
CONTENTS xvii
CHAPTER X
THE STATE OF ENGLISH CATHOLICS, 1559-1601
PAGES
The deprivations^ resulting from the tendering of the oath of
supremacy — The state of England after Elizabeth's accession
— The conciliatory endeavours of Pius IV. to remedy matters
— The succession of Pius V. and his determination to crush
the queen — The bull of excommunication and deprivation
of sovereign rights — Its effect upon English catholics —
Parliamentary counter-enactments to the bull — The establish-
ment of seminaries at Douai and Rome for the English
mission — The origin and marvellous development of the
Jesuits — Their objects — They send two missioners (Parsons
and Campion) to England — The characters of the missioners
— The objections of the English Catholics overcome — The
political intrigues of Parsons — The martyrdom of Campion —
Parsons flies to the continent — The failure and ill-advised
nature of his intrigues — Other Jesuits in England — Parsons'
attempt to subjugate the secular clergy to the Jesuits — The
nature of his tactics and their assistance to Elizabeth —
Wisbeach and its miserable dissensions — The arch-priest con-
troversy— The appeal to Rome — Treatment of envoys — Eliza-
beth favours a deputation of the clergy to the pope — The
reception of the deputation and the termination of the contest
— The situation on the eve of the return of the benedictines
to the mission field 223-255
APPENDIX
THE CONSUETUDINARY OF ST. AUGUSTINE'S, CANTER-
BURY 257-310
THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
OF ST. BENEDICT
CHAPTER I
THE COMING OF THE MONKS
St. Gregory the Great (604), in the second Book
of Dialogues,1 tells us that shortly before the death
of St. Benedict (542) that great monastic law-giver
saw one night in vision the whole world gathered
together under one beam of the sun. The eyes of
the Saint surely must have rested with a peculiar
satisfaction upon one small island, then, save one
little corner, all shrouded in pagan darkness. For
England was destined within some fifty years after
his death to be taken hold of by his children and,
once converted, to become the most favoured spot in
all his patrimony. Eor, like Abraham of old, Bene-
dict was destined to be " the Father of many Nations,"
the harbinger of Truth and Justice and Civilisation
to races still wrapped in the darkness of heathendom.
And when he had entered into his patrimony, in
1 Chapter xxxv.
VOL. I. A
2 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
thousands of monasteries, in Europe alone, was he
invoked as father ; and each of these houses became
a centre of Life and Light to all the country round.
But nowhere did his sons identify themselves with
the land, and link themselves in love with the
people, as in England. Here they were racy of the
soil ; and in English Benedictine hearts love of
country existed side by side with love of their state.
Up and down the land most of the episcopal sees,
those centres of Life to the Church, were founded
by them ; and in course of time monks formed the
chapters. For centuries the Primate of all England
wore the habit of St. Benedict, and was elected to
his post by the monks of Christ Church cathedral-
monastery. And in the social order, the England of
to-day owes much to the monks, who founded schools
and universities, hospitals and workshops. All the
learning there was they possessed, and, with generous
hand, freely did they open their stores of knowledge
to all comers. The very foundations of English
liberty and law and order were laid by benedictines
interpreting and living according to their Rule.
" They were all in all to England ; its doctors and
its lawyers and its councillors ; and on every page
of the country's annals their names may be found in
honour as the champions of the liberties of Church
and People." *
It is not going too far, but it is the sober truth to
1 A Sketch of the Life and Mission of St. Benedict, by a monk of
St. Gregory's Priory (Downside, 1 880), p. 24.
THE COMING OF THE MONKS 3
say, England in great measure is what she is to-day
through the work and the influence of St. Benedict's
sons. And there has always been deep set in English
hearts a love for the Benedictine name, which no
time, absence, or calumny could efface.
Sent by Gregory the Great, himself a monk and
founder of monasteries, and who himself would have
come had not his elevation to the Chair of Peter
intervened, Augustine, prior of the monastery of St.
Andrew's on the Celian Hill,1 at Rome, with forty
companions, after long journeyings and much dis-
couragement, landed on English soil. Richborough,
in the Island of Thanet, is the spot which, if tradition
speaks truly, welcomed the monks, and whence they
spread gradually over the whole country. No time
was lost in preparing for their work. In solemn
procession, with silver cross and painted banner
borne aloft, they set out, chanting litanies in the
grave, majestic Latin tongue ; and they called upon
God, through the intercession of His saints, to
enlighten the Saxons who then sat in darkness, to
dispel the shadow of death hanging over the land, and
to set this people's feet in the ways of peace.2 How
the glad tidings were received by king and people,
and how, in a short hundred years, from that corner
in Kent a force went forth which stirred up the
hearers to receive the faith, and going beyond the
1 The Cardinalitial title of SS. Gregory and Andrew on the Celian
Hill was assigned with peculiar fitness to the late cardinal Manning,
.and again to his successor, the present archbishop of Westminster.
2 Bede's Historia Ecclesiastica Gentis Anglorwn, lib. i. c. xxv.
4 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
borders, roused other missioners, monks too, to come
and help in the work of evangelising, is well known
to all. The impulse and example were Augustine's.
The other helpers in the vineyard at length fell in
with the plan he received from pope Gregory and
the traditions he brought from the Apostolic See.
The foundations of the English Church were set
with consummate skill. Both Gregory and Augus-
tine were men full of the Benedictine largeness of
mind. In answer to Augustine, Gregory had in-
structed him to select any of the rites and usages
found in the neighbouring churches of Gaul and
elsewhere, which he might consider more useful
for the newly-formed English Church than those
observed in Rome.1 And so, tended by such men,
the Faith of Christ took root in a congenial soil, and
in due time grew and took the outward form of
beauty, in harmony with the national characteristics.
On his first arrival he built, just outside the city
walls, a monastery which he dedicated to SS. Peter
and Paul (afterwards known as St. Augustine's), in
1 "You know, my brother, the custom of the Eoman Church, in
which you remember you were bred up. But it pleases me that if you
have found anything either in the Roman or the Gallican, or any
other Church which may be more acceptable to Almighty God, you
carefully make choice of the same, and sedulously teach the Church
of the English, which, as yet, is new in the Faith, whatsoever you can
gather from the several Churches. For things are not to be loved for
the sake of places, but places for the sake of good things. Choose
therefore from every Church those things that are pious, religious,
and upright, and when you have, as it were, made them up into one
body, let the minds of the English be accustomed thereto." — Bede,,
Histor. Eccl., lib. i. cap 27 (Bonn's Translation), pp. 41, 42.
THE COMING OF THE MONKS 5
which he chose his last resting-place. But as the
centre of his work, Augustine founded, along with
his cathedral of Christ Church at Canterbury, a
monastery for his monks, thus reproducing in
the dedications at Canterbury the two features of
Rome, the Lateran and Vatican churches ; just as
at Eochester, hard by, they recalled by the same
means their old home of St. Andrew's on the
Celian Hill, and at London St. Paul's, extra muros.
From his companions he selected Mellitus and
Justus to be bishops of the sees he had set up at
the neighbouring towns of London and Rochester.
Paulinus, too, was sent by him to York, there to
lay the foundations of the Church in the kingdom
of Northumbria.
Among the remnants of the British Church which
had fled for shelter to the mountains of Wales, were
many Irish monks whose manner of living was
much the same as that of St. Columbanus ; and
great monasteries, as for instance that of Bangor,
still flourished. But they would have nothing to
do with the new-comers, who invited them to help
in converting their hated oppressors the Saxons.
They would not heed the call of Augustine, and
on frivolous pretexts refused to acknowledge him.
Neither would they bring themselves into line with
the rest of the Western Church on changes of
discipline which, in their present isolation, were
unknown to them. They would not listen, but
remained sullen and obstinate in their separation.
6 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
Not so, however, with other monks from Ireland and
the Scottish isles. They came into the northern
parts of England and walked in harmony with the
Roman missionaries. But when in some of them, too,
the conservative element asserted itself unduly and
made them want to remain stationary while the
rest of the world moved, these remnants of a past
age retired from the scene, and the more vigorous
of the Celtic missioners gradually amalgamated with
the Roman monks.1
Although in parts the Faith for a while was
resisted and missionaries had to fly the storm, other
monks took their place and toiled on, gathering
in the harvest which lay white on all the country
round. Soon, too, sprung up monasteries of virgins
who served God in the monastic habit. Hilda,2
1 The rule of St. Columbanus professes to be simply a tradition of
what he had learnt in Ireland. The code of discipline is marked by-
much sternness and severity, forming in this a complete contrast to
the moderation of St. Benedict. Lashes, even to two hundred in
number, were freely bestowed for very trivial faults. Fastings, ex-
communications, and lengthened periods of enforced silence were also
ordinary punishments. This rigidity was bound to give way in time
to the more human, and therefore more natural, spirit which came
from Monte Cassino.
2 St. Hilda, from her connection with St. Aidan, evidently at first
followed the Scottish rule. But we find her later on sending some
of her monks to Canterbury to learn the discipline and rule of the
benedictines at Christ Church. Probably after the famous synod of
Whitby (664), when she found so many of the columban monks pre-
ferring their dead traditions to the living voice, she turned for safety's
sake to St. Benedict's rule, which had come to England directly from
the Chair of Peter. Lingard says that the benedictine Rule was first
introduced into Northumbria in 661 ; while the West Saxons received
it in 675, and the Mercians not until 709. See History of England
(ed. 1849), vol. i. p. 269, note.
THE COMING OF THE MONKS 7
Etheldreda, Mildred, Werburgh, Edith, and others,
were leaders in a movement which called maidens
from the courts of kings to the cloister of the
King of kings. Princes, too, put down their crowns
and sceptres and put on the humble garb of the
monk, and, in the silence of the monastery, won
victories more glorious than had been theirs out-
side the cloister.
So the work sped. Great names such as Wilfrid
(709) and Benet Biscop (690) stand out as pre-eminent
in the work of introducing the rule of St. Benedict
into the North. The first, educated at Lindisfarne,
gained his earliest impressions of Benedictine life
from Canterbury, whence he journeyed through
France to Eome. There he was confirmed in them.
The other, who had become a monk at Lerins 1 in
666, came from Home itself in the train of the
great archbishop Theodore, and by him was made
abbat of St. Augustine's at Canterbury. After two
years, in 671, he, too, went to Northumbria, and
built an abbey at Wearmouth and another at Jarrow.
These were the men raised up by God to strengthen
and establish monastic discipline throughout Eng-
land after the pattern laid down by St. Benedict.
By their travels in France and Italy they were able
to gather, here and there, the best features of regular
observance, and returning they introduced them into
English houses during their frequent journeys up
and down the country. iEdde in his life of Wilfrid
1 St. Augustine stayed at Lerins on his way to England.
8 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
speaks in the fourteenth chapter of the visits to
Canterbury, whence " returning with the Rule of
Benedict to his own region (Ripon), with iEdde and
iEona, the chanters, and with architects, and with
the ministry of almost every kind of art, he right
well improved the institutions of the Church." 1
Benet, like Wilfrid, was constant in his journey-
ings to Rome. But while the one went for
Justice, the other was drawn abroad in the inter-
ests of his monasteries of Wearmouth and Jarrow.
He collected a large library, and introduced into
England new arts and industries, notably those
of building in stone and the glazier's craft. He
brought back ancient manuscripts, rich paintings
and vestments, and great stores of relics of
saints and martyrs. In one of these monasteries
(Jarrow) dwelt Bede the Venerable, the type of
the monk ; a student and a scholar, who loved to
impart his knowledge to others. Passing from
childhood to old age in the faithful observance
of the Religious Life, he is the flower of the
monastic schools, such as were started by Aidan
and Aldhelm. He, too, is the father of English
history.
About a hundred years after Benet Biscop had
lived and worked, the storm of Danish invasion swept
down upon the coast, and the northern monasteries
felt to the full the effects of the disastrous times.
1 Gale, Remrn Anglicarum Scriptores, vol. iii. p. 58.
THE COMING OF THE MONKS 9
But long before destruction thus fell upon them at
home, Saxon benedictine monks had turned their
faces towards the still heathen tribes of Germany.
Winfrid, Willibald, and Willibrord, with a host of
others, including nuns who went to do Woman's
work in evangelising, became the apostles and
teachers of other countries, and by toil and blood
founded Churches fruitful in saints.
When the fierceness of the invaders passed, the
Saxon monks set themselves manfully to repair
the disaster, and rebuild the broken walls of the
houses destroyed by the Danes.1 How they re-
stored civilisation Cardinal Newman shall tell us ;
for the picture he draws of St. Benedict's Mission
to Europe in general is perfect in detail as regards
England in old Saxon days.
"He (St. Benedict) found the world, physical
and social, in ruins, and his mission was to restore
it in the way — not of science, but of nature ; not
as if setting about to do it ; not professing to do
it by any set time, or by any series of strokes ; but
so quietly, patiently, gradually, that often till the
work was done, it was not known to be doing. It
1 The nunneries in the northern parts of England, the most exposed
to the Danish invasion, never recovered themselves as the monasteries
did. It was not until after the Conquest that convents for women were
again established in these parts. The southern parts were more for-
tunate in some instances. This will also account for the fact that there
were so few houses for women that were abbeys. The Saxon houses
were invariably abbatial ; but of the Norman foundation three only
attained that dignity ; to wit, Godstowe, Mailing, and Elstowe.
io THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
was a restoration rather than a visitation, correction,
or conversion. The new world he helped to create
was a growth rather than a structure. Silent men
were observed about the country, or discovered in
the forest digging, cleaning, and building ; and other
silent men, not seen, were sitting in the cold cloister
tiring their eyes and keeping their attention on
the stretch, while they painfully deciphered, then
copied and recopied, the manuscripts which they
had saved. There was no' one that contended or
cried out, or drew attention to what was going on ;
but by degrees the woody swamp became a hermi-
tage, a religious house, a farm, an abbey, a village,
a seminary, a school of learning, and a city. Roads
and villages connected it with other abbeys and
cities which had similarly grown up ; and what the
haughty Alaric or fierce Attila had broken to pieces
these patient meditative men have brought together
and made to live again. And then, when they had
in the course of many years gained their peaceful
victories, perhaps some new invaders came, and with
fire and sword undid their slow and persevering toil
in an hour. . . . Down in the dust lay the labour
and civilisation of centuries — churches, colleges,
cloisters, libraries — and nothing was left to them but
to begin all over again ; but this they did without
grudging, so promptly, cheerfully, and tranquilly, as
if it were by some law of nature that the restoration
came ; and they were like the flowers and shrubs and
great trees which they reared, and which, when ill-
THE COMING OF THE MONKS n
treated, do not take vengeance or remember evil,
but give forth fresh branches, leaves, and blossoms,
perhaps in greater profusion or with richer quality,
for the very reason that the old were rudely
broken off."1
Thus did the monks live and work after the
eighth century had expired amid the flames the
Danes had enkindled. Foremost in the work of
restoration was Dunstan, whose name is writ large
over the history of his times. To him and to his
fellow-worker Ethelwold and to Oswald must be
given the success of the revival. Of the former,
Cardinal Newman says : —
"As a religious he shows himself in the simple
character of a benedictine. He had a taste for the
arts generally, especially music. He painted and
embroidered ; his skill in smith's work is recorded
in the well-known legend of his combat with the
evil one. And, as the monks of Hilarion joined
gardening with psalmody, and Bernard and his
cistercians joined field-work with meditation, so did
St. Dunstan use music and painting as directly ex-
pressive or suggestive of devotion. ' He excelled in
writing, painting, moulding in wax, carving in wood
and bone, and in work in gold, silver, iron, and
brass,' says the author of his life in Surius, ' and he
used his skill in musical instruments to charm away
from himself and others their secular annoyances,
1 Historical Sketches : " The Mission of St. Benedict," vol. iii. pp.
410,411.
12 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
and to raise them to the theme of heavenly harmony,
both by the sweet words with which he accom-
panied his airs and by the concord of the airs
themselves.' " *
Abbat of Glastonbury, and looking forward to no
other occupation than that of training the vine com-
mitted to him, Dunstan, by one of those noteworthy
exceptions, was called from the peace of the cloister
into the turmoil of political life.
11 It must be a serious emergency, a particular
inspiration, a sovereign command, which brings the
monk into political life ; and he will be sure to
make a great figure in it, else why should he have
been torn from his cloister at all ? . . . The work (he)
had to do, as far as it was political, was such as none
could have done but a monk with his superhuman
single-mindedness and his pertinacity of purpose." 2
Made successively bishop of Worcester and of
London, and then archbishop of Canterbury, he was
able by his influence to bring about a general re-
storation of monastici sm in England. Beyond a
peremptory and somewhat overweening assertion of
a Winchester monk writing at the end of the tenth
century, there seems to be no contemporary proof of
the often asserted proposition that monasticism had
almost ceased in England. The fact seems to be the
reverse, for the documentary evidence at hand points
to the existence of houses other than Glaston and
1 Ibid. pp. 415, 416. 2 Ibid. pp. 381, 382.
THE COMING OF THE MONKS 13
Abingdon. It was the northern monasteries that
principally felt the effects of the Danish invasion,
while those of the south escaped. But doubtlessly-
learning and observance had greatly fallen in the
surviving monasteries, and it was from the restored
vigour of Glaston, Abingdon, and Winchester that
English benedictines renewed their spirit. Together
with the new life came an outburst of intellectual
activity. A religious and artistic development took
place, which is the crowning glory of the Anglo-
Saxon Church.
Dunstan found a powerful support in the pious
King Edgar, who seconded all his efforts with the
resources of the temporal power. Ethelwold, bishop
of Winchester, and one of the monks of his own
monastery of Glaston, carried out in detail the plan
conceived in the master mind of the great primate.
At Worcester, too, bishop Oswald was working to the
same end, on lines he had learnt at Fleury, where he
had become a monk. Under these bishops, monks
were introduced into the cathedral churches of
Winchester and Worcester.
The king and a thane, Alfreth, gave Ethelwold
the manor of Southborne, on the condition he trans-
lated the Eule of St. Benedict into Anglo-Saxon, so
that those who did not know Latin might learn the
monastic life.1 This the bishop did, and to him is
also due the redaction of the Concordia Eegularis,
1 This is very possibly the very translation which has been lately
edited on a collation of the MSS. by Professor Schroer.
i4 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
a body of rules to be observed by English monks
and nuns.1 This was also translated into the native
tongue.2
Under the care of Dunstan and Ethelwold and
Oswald, in a few years more than forty monasteries
rose from their ruins, and God's praises were sung
throughout the land once more by Benedictine lips.
Piety and learning 3 again flourished.
The author of the Concordia Regularis states that
he has allowed himself the same freedom Gregory
gave to Augustine, of choosing the best things he
could find, and that he had taken whatever he
considered useful4 in the two nearest great centres
of Benedictine life, Fleury5 and Ghent, in the abbeys
1 For the Concordia Regularis see Reyner's Apostolatus Benedictinorum
in Anglia, iii. pp. 77-94.
2 See " Anglia " of Halle, vol. xiii. p. 365.
3 The feast of the Conception of Our Lady seems to have originated
in England, and can be traced to the monks of Winchester. It was
prevalent and firmly established before the Conquest, when, like so
many English customs, it suffered a temporary eclipse. Its revival
was mainly due to the younger Anselm, abbat of St. Edmundsbury, in
the latter half of Henry I., and was formally sanctioned by a council
held in London, 1 129. The story of Helin of Ramsey is in the highest
degree doubtful. See Downside Review, vol. v. p. 107.
4 See Procemium of the Concordia Regularis.
5 Ethelwold, as soon as he became abbat of Abingdon, besides
getting chanters from Corbie (Chron. de Ab., vol. i. p. 129), sent Osgar
" to Fleury to be further instructed in the observance of St. Benedict's
Rule." See " Saxon Leechdoms," vol. iii. p. 409, in Roll Series. Mr.
Cockayne is mistaken when he adds " and to fetch home a copy " ; this
is not the meaning of the original texts. As a fact, the earliest known
copy of St. Benedict's Rule, and embodying the primitive text, is an
English manuscript of a date more than two centuries earlier than
Ethelwold.
THE COMING OF THE MONKS 15
of which latter city Dunstan, during his exile under
Edwi (956), had found shelter.
But while the author of the Concordia, who
evidently writes under the influence of the master-
mind of Dunstan, was quick enough to recognise
and use all that was good in foreign interpretations
of the Rule, he was too wise to establish whole-
sale such of their provisions as were unsuitable to
Englishmen. There was no rough upheaval of past
traditions ; neither were these treated with contempt
and set aside as useless. He particularly lays down
that : " We have determined in no ways to cast
aside the worthy customs of this country pertaining
to the (service of the) Lord, which we have learnt
from the practice of those who went before us ; but
(on the contrary) altogether to give them new force
and vigour." 1 A wise provision ; for in a rule so
wide and elastic as St. Benedict's, and in which so
much is left to the discretion of local superiors, it
is but common sense to suppose that Englishmen
will be the best interpreters of what is useful for
the men with whom they have to deal, and of what
is most in keeping with the national character.
The daily life of monks under the Concordia
Regularis was on the following plan, with local
variations no doubt. The monks rose at 2 a.m.,
and spent a long day in the office and work ap-
pointed till 8 p.m., when they went to bed. The
constitutions go into many interesting details both
1 Procemium to the Concordia Regularis.
16 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
of liturgical and domestic interest. For instance,
the little hours took place at the normal times of
6 for prime, 9 for tierce, which was followed by
the mass, 12 for sext, 2 or 3 for none, 4 or 6 for
vespers, and 7 for compline. After prime, or be-
fore in summer, the monks put off the habits they
had slept in, and washed and shod themselves for
the day. From Easter till Holy Cross, in Sep-
tember, they dined after sext, and then had a
siesta. The intervals were filled up with reading ;
and it is evident from their remains that the time
was well spent. From Holy Cross till Lent, the
time of the monastic fast, they dined after none.
But in Lent they did not break their fast till vespers
had been sung. Before compline they put off their
day-clothes, and, on Saturdays, washed their feet.
In the winter, " from the Kalends of November till
the beginning of Lent," a fire was provided in the
common-room, to which all might go for warmth.
They had only one full meal a day, together with
a collation out of Lenten time.1 Such was the re-
1 Here it will be useful to gain a true view of the question, How
far did the law of perpetual abstinence enjoined by St. Benedict in his
Rule [Cap. 39] obtain in English monasteries % Prescinding from the
discretion he leaves to superiors, who are the best judges of the present
needs of their monks, we stand on solid ground when we listen to the
teaching of history on this point — and its teaching is clear and precise.
In the most nourishing time of English monasticism the use of flesh
meat was allowed. The use of poultry did not come under the pro-
hibition which forbids the carries quadrwpedum. Then, the example of
St. Ethel wold, on whom fell the practical work of refounding English
observance, is instructive. Whilst he himself, as a rule, never eat
meat, yet twice at least we find him going beyond his ordinary
THE COMING OF THE MONKS 17
newed Benedictine life which Dunstan, Ethelwold,
and Oswald built up again in England, and which
went on until an almost greater upheaval took place
when the Norman mastered the land, and for a time
foreigners were set to rule in abbeys and priories.
But, as we shall see, English monasticism was of
too sturdy a character to lose its own individuality.
Once more it quietly absorbed all the good there
was in the new element, and then reasserted itself
on its old lines, only more strong and more comely
than ever.
custom. Once, during a space of three months, when sick, he eat
meat by the express command of St. Dunstan, his former abbat and
spiritual guide, and then again during his last illness (See the original life
of the saint in Chron. de Ab.t vol. ii. p. 263). But while severe to him-
self, he was lenient to others in this matter. At Abingdon, his first and
most special foundation, he showed his estimate of the common need
by permitting in the refectory a dish of stew mixed with meat, ferculum
came mixtum; and on certain feast-days, meat puddings, artocrece (Chron.
de Ab.} vol. ii. p. 279). It is hardly to be doubted that what was estab-
lished at Abingdon represented the custom Ethelwold had learnt at
Glaston from Dunstan himself, and found its counterpart in the other
monasteries existing and restored at this time. "He established
monasteries in Abingdon, Hyde, Ely, Burgh, and Thorney, and in
all (introduced) the customs which prevailed in the monastery of
Abingdon" (Chron. de Ab., vol. i. pp. 345-348 ; ii. p. 279). Of course,
from the practice of St. Ethelwold, it cannot be necessarily inferred that
the custom obtained in every English monastery. But the Concordia,
which was drawn up for all, seems to provide for and recognise the
custom as generally existing. Pinguedo (pork fat) is here allowed up
to Septuagesima (Apostolatus, iii. p. 85). Thus far we get light upon a
subject about which there has been much misapprehension, and find
what was the custom, as a matter of fact, in houses the most fervent
and most affected by the great revival under St. Dunstan.
VOL. I.
CHAPTER II
THE NORMAN LANFRANC
The Church of the Anglo-Saxon, the work mainly
of monks, spread over all the land. Its growth in
holiness, in civilisation, in learning of all kinds, is
witnessed by the memories of a Bede, a Wulstan,
a Panlinus, an Erkonwald and Aldhelm, and many
others whose names are sweet in English ears ; and
the sons of St. Benedict were regarded with loving
reverence as the benefactors of their country. But
all this fair province of God's Church was once more
to be devastated but not destroyed, changed but not
altered. Not this time by pagan Dane, but by
Christian Northmen, men who to their native sim-
plicity and bravery had added the culture of the
Franks, whom they had conquered, and among whom
they had settled.
But the changes about to be wrought in England
did not come solely from the fact that the Saxons
had to recognise Normans as masters by right of
conquest. The invaders were the means by which
a movement already greatly developed abroad made
its power felt in English monasteries.
The changes then going on in society at large
THE NORMAN LANFRANC 19
brought into relief, more strongly than at other times,
a feature in Benedictine government which might,
under force of exterior circumstances, degenerate from
its primitive institution. Each abbey, being alone
and separated from other houses, was obviously less
capable of resisting external attacks than when
united with others for common defence. It was
not an unknown thing, for instance, for some lay
nobleman, through royal influence and favours, to
be appointed abbat of a monastery in his neighbour-
hood. Taking up his residence in the abbey, he
would bring with him a train of servants and his
family to boot. All this was to the grave detri-
ment both of the property of the abbey, and was
fatal to its welfare and discipline. These disorders,
to appear under another guise later on, were preva-
lent in the districts of Burgundy and the western
parts of Germany. In 927 Odo of Tours began at
Cluni, of which he became abbat, to cope with the
difficulty. He met it on two sides — by ordaining
a confederation of houses, over which the abbat of
Cluni should preside, and by periodical chapters
of the abbats of the Order to be held at the
head-house. Before long this naturally resulted in
subjection ; the abbat of Cluni became lord and
master of all. Together with these constitutional
changes were others regarding the daily life of those
who joined the reform. The cluniacs, for so the
new Order was called, claimed to live in strict
accord with the spirit of the Eule of St. Benedict,
2o THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
and certainly in the matter of the Divine Office,
"the Work of God" as the Law-giver calls it, they
let nothing be preferred before it. Their ritual
observances were marked by a great wealth of
splendour and a grandeur and majesty hitherto not
realised.1 It was the marked feature of their life
and work. Cluni was fortunate in having at its
start many remarkable men, who, gifted with wise
energy, stirred up an enthusiasm which carried on
the reform, or rather the new Order, to a success-
ful issue. Its houses spread far and wide, and
the influence of Cluni made itself felt in quarters
where its ideals, as a whole, did not find favour.
But it attained its success at the loss of a vital
principle. The family tie, so essential a feature
in Benedictine life, was lost ; for the cluniacs,
in whichever of their hundred of houses they
might happen to live, were counted members of this
great abbey. We need not carry on the history
of the Order. Enough has been said to illustrate
the character of the changes that awaited the black
monks of England.
The chief agent in bringing about the consoli-
1 Some of the other peculiarities of the cluniac Order may here be
noted. Two high masses were celebrated every day, and on all greater
solemnities the deacon used to be communicated with a part of the
priest's host. They were employed more apparently in manual labour,
in which all had to take a share, than in study ; for as a matter of fact,
in view of their enormous extension, the books they wrote are compara-
tively few. At the chapter each monk was bound to publicly accuse
his brethren of any faults he had seen in them. There was great
charity to the poor. ]
THE NORMAN LANFRANC 21
dation of the Norman-Saxon Church, was the illus-
trious Lanfranc, archbishop of Canterbury and ex
officio abbat of the cathedral-monastery of Christ
Church.
Born at Pavia (1005), he became renowned as
a teacher, and was in the height of his fame
when suddenly the vocation came. Hurrying off to
Normandy, he hid himself about the year 1042 in the
abbey of Bee, under the abbat Herluin. It was then
but a poor monastery, consisting of mud hovels ; yet
under its holy superior it was growing rich in virtue
and the gifts of the spiritual life. Here the light of
Lanfranc's learning and piety could not be hid ; and
his brethren found in the humble brother the famous
professor whose loss the learned world was then
bewailing. Soon his retreat was discovered, and
many of his old scholars flocked to Bee and im-
plored him to help them. The abbat ordered him
to resume his lectures ; and at once, from being an
unknown monastery, Bee became one of the most
famous centres of learning in Europe. Lanfranc
had by that time become prior of Bee, and Herluin's
chief adviser. The large ideas and the sense of
beauty in ecclesiastical art he had brought from Italy,
joined with the new ideas of liturgical splendour
emanating from Cluni, seized upon the prior, and he
determined to make of "white-robed Bee"1 a model
of monastic observance. The idea of magnificence
1 The monks of Bee till 1626 wore a whitish-coloured habit. Cf.
Leland's Antiquarii Collectanea, ed. alt. vol. iv. p. 13.
22 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
had, by that time, taken possession of the Normans
and was showing itself in stately buildings, magnifi-
cent apparel, and a personal grandeur which had be-
come marked features of the age. Hence the time
was propitious for the prior's project. The abbat built
a church which surpassed in splendour anything
known in those parts, and for its use a consuetu-
dinary, " the Use of Bee," 1 was drawn up in which
were reflected the ideas of great stateliness and
beauty of worship.
And how did Lanfranc find his cathedral-monas-
tery of Canterbury? If William of Malmesbury,
who wrote the Gesta Pontificum in 1125, is to
be relied upon, " The monks of Canterbury, like
all then in England, were hardly different from
seculars, except that they were careful on the score
of chastity. They amused themselves with hunt-
ing, with falconry, with horse-racing ; they loved to
rattle the dice ; they indulged in drink ; they wore
fine clothes, studied personal appearance, disdained
a frugal and quiet life, and had such a retinue of
servants, that they were more like secular nobles
than monks." 2
But it will be well to remember that the Normans
1 " The Use of Bee " was adapted in other abbeys, with such changes
as various surroundings and traditions demanded. In 1063 Lanfranc
was made abbat of Caen, a monastery built by William Duke of
Normandy on a scale of princely splendour. In 1067 he refused the
archbishopric of Rouen. This was the man who, in 1070, was chosen
by William the Conqueror as archbishop of Canterbury.
2 Malm., De Gestis Pontif. (Roll Series), p. 70.:
THE NORMAN LANFRANC 23
treated the Saxons as a conquered people, and looked
upon everything they found as barbarous and needing
reformation. The monasteries, being in the minds of
the new masters hotbeds of conservatism in which
the old Saxon spirit was deeply engrained, they must
be taken severely in hand and purged of all such
tendencies. Hence it was with a prejudiced eye
that writers, such as William of Malmesbury, looked
upon the native monk. His account must therefore
be taken for what it is worth. Besides, be it remem-
bered, by his express testimony morality was kept
in repute, and this hardly seems likely if the pic-
ture he draws is to be taken as an accurate one.
Where drinking, gaming, and feasting are, there
chastity is not likely to remain long : and yet they
are expressly exempted from such a charge by the
historian. His account does not tally with experi-
ence. That the rigour of discipline had fallen off
since the days when their cathedral and monastery
had been burnt by the Danes, and their archbishop
Elphege (ion) murdered might well have been.
But there must have been " grit " in them ; for by
1020 they had repaired their church and resumed
their life after the simple earnest ways of their
forefathers. Their number, however, was small; and
where numbers are small, observance is difficult.
Whatever their state may have been at Canterbury
at the time of the Conquest, one thing is certain, it
did not satisfy the more magnificent ideas of Lanfranc.
The simplicity of Saxon ritual did not accord with
24 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
the splendour of worship which had been borrowed
from Cluni for Bee and then for his own abbey at
Caen. Canterbury must be brought up to the level of
the new ideas, and a favourable opportunity offered
itself. The cathedral church of Christ Church, the
mother-church of the land, had been burnt down
on St. Nicholas' day 1067, and although it had
been repaired, its condition but ill sorted with its
dignity. Lanfranc lent himself manfully to the task.
In a short time, but seven years, a new church arose,
or rather a new choir (1070) more commensurate
with his dignified ideas. Built in the Norman style
of the period, the few remains, such as they are, still
delight us. The monastery itself was rebuilt, and
soon one hundred and fifty monks were gathered
together and sang God's praises. For them Lanfranc
compiled his famous " statutes," a code of observa-
tion largely liturgical. It is in reality in most
points but little else than the " Use of Bee." When
he sent them to Henry, prior of Christ Church, he
enclosed a letter in which he says : —
" We send to you written customs of our Order
which we have gathered from the customs of those
monasteries which nowadays are of the greatest
weight in the monastic Order. We have also added
a very few things and changed also a little, especially
as regards the celebration of the festivals, deeming
they ought to be kept with greater excellence in our
Church on account of its having the primatial chair.
In which things, however, we do not wish in any
THE NORMAN LANFRANC 25
way to hamper either ourselves or those who come
after us, so that we cannot either add to or take
away from, or change them if we think that these
matters can be improved on either as the result of
our own experience or by the example of others.
For however far advanced a man may think himself
to be, he is woefully deficient if he thinks that he
cannot improve. For a greater or less number of
brethren, a varying income, circumstances, differ-
ences of personal appreciation, often call for changes.
So that hardly any Church can imitate its neighbour
in all things." *
Lanfranc's changes were the work of time,
spreading over many years ; for, to quote William
of Malmesbury again : —
" Lanfranc was most skilful in the art of arts, the
government of souls, and knowing well that habit
is second nature, though bent on reforming, he did
his work with prudence, and plucking up the weeds
little by little, sowed good seed in their place." 2
His nephew, Paul, who had been set over the
abbey of St. Albans, took Lanfranc' s constitutions
bodily and introduced them into his house, and
adopted his uncle's prudent methods also.3 What
the local influence and example of Lanfranc achieved
at Canterbury and at St. Albans, was done on
similar lines at other abbeys, where new rulers
1 Apostolatus, iii. p. 211.
2 Malm., De Gestis Pontif. (Roll Series), p. 71.
3 Walsingam, Gesta abbatum monasterii S. Albani (Roll Series), vol. i.
p. 52.
26 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
would naturally introduce such changes as they
themselves had been accustomed to in the Norman
abbeys wherein they had learnt the monastic life.
A general similarity would mark the movement,
but local influence would of course have had full
play ; for whether we visited Glaston, St. Albans,
York, or Chester, we should have found these local
peculiarities which must grow round anything that
is worthy of the name of " home."
These changes were sore indeed to the Saxon
monks, and were sometimes brought about only
after great difficulty ; for it was not every abbat
who, at a time when race antipathies were strong,
had Lanfranc's discretion. For instance, when Thur-
stan, a monk of Caen, was appointed as abbat of
Glaston, one of his first steps was to introduce the
fashion of chanting to which he had been used.
This was the signal for trouble ; for, to quote the
words of Ordericius : —
" When the violent (protervus) abbat tried to force
the Glastonians to give up the chant the English
had learnt from the disciples of blessed Gregory, the
pope, and learn from these Flemings or Normans
another chant quite unknown or unheard of before,
so fierce a strife arose, which was soon followed by
the disgrace of the holy Order. For while the monks
would not receive these new regulations, and by
their contumacy the stubbornness of their master
continuing, lay-men, by the authority of their lord,
fell upon the luckless monks in choir with arrows,
THE NORMAN LANFRANC 27
and some of them were cruelly hurt, and (so it is
said) even mortally wounded." *
A similar story is told of Malmesbury abbey. In
the case of Glaston, the result was in favour of the
monks. Thurstan was removed by the King, and
a more prudent man set in his place.
In the wake of the Normans, the monks of Cluni
entered England and brought with them the idea of
monasteries ruled by superiors, the mere nominees
at will of an abbat of the house beyond the seas
which counted them all her subjects. At the sug-
gestion of Lanfranc, it appears, William, Earl of
Surrey, the Conqueror's son-in-law, first brought over
in 1077 the cluniacs and settled them at Lewes.
In a few years, before William Rufus began his
reign, they had secured other houses in England
and thence spread. The houses of Bermondsey,
Northampton, Thetford, Wenlock, Lenton, Monta-
cute, and Castleacre, are some of their better known
foundations, and we may note that altogether there
were some thirty-eight houses of this Order in
England, besides three hospitals in London and two
manors depending on the abbey of Cluni itself.
Although the number of their houses was thus
considerable and many were large, their peculiar
form of government did not find favour with Eng-
lishmen, and their Order never became racy of the
soil. And even when some cluniacs were appointed
over English abbeys, this did not affect the inde-
1 Historia Ecrfesiastica, ed. Migne, p. 335.
28 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
pendence of these houses. Even those great English
abbeys which at times were ruled by cluniacs, kept
themselves aloof from any relations with Cluni itself,
except that their revenues — as, for instance, at
Glaston and Winchester — were used to free Cluni
from debt, and seem for four years practically to
have supported that house.1
This century was the golden age for monasticism.
Abbeys and priories sprung up on every side. The
burst of new life which the Conquest gave to
England, and the tone of mind induced by the
growth of chivalry, turned men's minds strongly to
the high and noble ideal of the monastic state.
The monk was the " Knight of God," and his victories
over sin and self appealed to ardent hearts which
consumed themselves in the task of accomplishing
deeds of valour and heroism. Hence to this period
we owe many of our greatest foundations, e.g.
Durham, where the bishop, William of St. Carileph,
formerly abbat of St. Vincent's at Mans, accom-
plished what his predecessor had vainly tried to
do. He gave the secular canons, who possessed
the church he designed for his cathedral, the choice
of either remaining as monks or of else departing.
All, except the dean, elected to go ; and for them
the bishop, by command of the Pope, instituted the
collegiate churches of Aukland, Darlington, and
Norton, and provided them with suitable pensions.2
1 Cf. Sir G. F. Duckett's Charters and Records of Cluny, p. 79.
2 Simeonis Dunelmensis Historia de Dunel. Ecclesia., lib. iv. cap. 2 et 3.
THE NORMAN LANFRANC 29
The monks from the old abbeys of Wearmouth
and Jarrow were translated to Durham in 1083 ;
and these houses thenceforth became merely cells
dependent on the cathedral-monastery. St. Mary's,
York, Battle Abbey, Colchester, Reading, Pershore,
and Gloucester are some of the many foundations of
this period, to say nothing of the new Order of the
white monks of Citeaux, and the black or augustinian
canons, and the white canons of Premontre.1
In the midst of all this activity, one side of
the peculiar movement, which resulted in the new
Orders of Cluni and Citeaux, began to tell upon
the black monks here and elsewhere. We refer
to the constitutional organisation which now began
to develop itself. In France, for instance, the
abbats of St. Amand, Lobbes, Liesse, Anchin, Eebais,
Lagny, and others, all belonging to the ecclesiasti-
cal province of Rheims, agreed, about the year 1 132,
to hold annual meetings for the maintenance of
discipline.2
An assembly in the year 11 52 of the abbats of
Upper Lorraine at Metz, under the presidency of
1 The origin and aims of the cistercians were briefly these : In 1098
Robert, abbat of Molesme, with Stephen Harding and some com-
panions, left his monastery in order to carry out the Rule of St.
Benedict to the letter. They found a shelter at Citeaux. The cister-
cians had a halo of glory cast over them by the great St. Bernard,
abbat of the house of Clairvaux. In opposition to the cluniacs, they
rejected liturgical pomp. They turned their attention to husbandry
and agriculture.
2 See Introduction to Monks of the West, by Dom F. A. Gasquet, ed.
Nimmo, vol. i. p. 39 ; and Downside Review, vol. v. p. 59.
So THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
Jordan, cardinal - priest, may have had a similar
object. These meetings are interesting, for they
show that in the immediate neighbourhood of Cluni
the idea of some form of association was beginning
to work its way among monks who had preserved
their own independence. It was being slowly gene-
rated, and the time and opportunity for putting it
into practice upon strictly Benedictine lines was
close at hand.
Innocent III. in the year 1 2 1 5 held a general
council at Home (the Fourth Lateran) which was
attended by 412 bishops and nearly 1000 abbats
and priors, and there decreed, among other legisla-
tion, a system of union for black monks. What
this system was, and how well it meets both the
acknowledged want and the requirements of the
Benedictine ideal, will be seen in the following
chapter.
CHAPTER III
THE BENEDICTINE CONSTITUTION
There are no such things, properly speaking, as
benedictine constitutions in the sense the word
is used in other orders. The benedictines do not
form one large body with a general at their head ;
for St. Benedict did not legislate for a world-wide
corporation but for a state of life. Such a form of
government as obtains, for instance, in the francis-
can or dominican orders would be entirely foreign
to the spirit of the holy Eule. Each of the modern
orders has some special work in view, to which all
their life is directed. They have to find their salva-
tion through the various works of charity for which
they were formed, or which they have taken up as
an integral portion of their work. Not so with the
benedictine. He has no external work peculiar
to his order. St. Benedict's ideal is that of the
common Christian life of the "Counsels" practised
to a higher degree than can be in the world. It is
simply the Gospel put into practice. The vows, for
instance, of Poverty and Chastity are not explicit as
to other orders; for when the Christian life is drawn
out to its perfection on the plain, broad Gospel
32 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
lines, the spirit of poverty must be cultivated and
the body kept in subjection.
The vows the benedictine makes are three in
number : Stability, that is, to remain attached to his
monastery and not wander at will ; Conversion of
life, that is, until death to labour after attaining the
perfection of the state to which he is called ; and
lastly, Obedience to the abbat. The first two vows
concern mainly his interior life, the last his external
relation to his superiors. Obedience understood,
then, by a benedictine does away with the necessity
of laying down minute laws and tracing carefully
the lines in which a superior and a subject respec-
tively may move. Constitutions of this kind would
cut away entirely at the Benedictine idea of the
" home," which we may venture to describe as of
this kind.
As God made Society to rest on the basis of the
Family, so St. Benedict saw that the spiritual family
is the surest basis for the sanctification of the souls
of his monks. The monastery therefore is to him
what the " home" is to lay-folk. It is a self-contained
family, having friendly relations indeed with others,
but in no wise losing its own independence and
individuality. It has its own peculiar way of look-
ing at things, its own ideals and its own kind of
work, which it has spontaneously undertaken, or
which has come to it unsought, and which it always
manages to stamp with its own peculiar mark. Of
this family the abbat is the father ; the monks are
THE BENEDICTINE CONSTITUTION 33
his sons. The whole spirit is " homely." The
monks trust their abbat whom they have freely
elected. He loves them and has confidence in
them, and in no way can he effectually act except
through them. In the benedictine abbey which has
grasped the idea of its lawgiver, there will be order
and rule, for no family can exist without them :
but the yoke will be sweet and the burden light.
Largeness and breadth will be the spirit of every
house ; while from the fact that the influence of any
one monastery must necessarily be circumscribed to
its own immediate neighbourhood, there will be less
chance of friction between one house and another.
When each is independent and works out its for-
tune in its own way, it is an easy matter so to
steer the course as to keep clear out of the way of
others. From this family idea comes another re-
sult : the very fact that St. Benedict did not found
an Order but only gave a Kule, cuts away all
possibility of that narrowing esprit de corps which
comes so easily to a widespread and highly orga-
nised body.
Lanfranc in the above-mentioned letter to Henry,
prior of Christ Church, says : " One point is most
carefully to be attended to, namely, that these
things without which there is no salvation are to
be thoroughly observed : I mean, faith, contempt
of the world, charity, chastity, lowliness, patience,
obedience, sorrow for past sins, lowly confession of
sin, frequent prayers, a fitting silence, and many
vol. 1. C
34 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
other things of this kind. Where these are observed,
there truly may the Rule of Holy Benet be said to
be followed, and there the monastic order kept. No
matter how different other things may be ; for there
are points which have obtained differently in different
monasteries by the opinions of different people." *
This, then, being the idea, any form of govern-
ment which destroys the autonomy of each house,
or which tends to break up the family, is foreign to
the very first principles of benedictine life, and can
only be tolerated for a time under the plea of some
very great necessity. Confederation of houses for
mutual support and advice, on the other hand, is in
keeping with the family idea ; and for the general
good each family may give up some of its rights, as
is done in the State. But it must be so arranged
that the essential rights are preserved intact, other-
wise it is Socialism in its baldest form. There had
been, as we have seen, for some time past a move-
ment towards some kind of union among black
monks. The vitality which existed in each house is
enough to account for such a movement seeking to
share its principle of life with others ; and we need
go no further to seek for the cause. We have also
seen how the first steps towards such an end had
resulted in specifically distinct orders like those of
Cluni and Citeaux. The obvious plan was for the
heads of neighbouring houses to meet together,
bringing some of their monks, and discuss such
1 Apostolatus, iii. p. 211.
THE BENEDICTINE CONSTITUTION 35
matters as were of general interest. This was the
plan the Church adopted and has expressed in the
Fourth General Council of Lateran. The twelfth
decree, the only one which concerns the monastic
order, in substance is as follows : —
In each province or kingdom let all the abbats
and priors of houses which are not abbeys meet
together (saving all episcopal rights) every three
years in some convenient monastery, and there hold
a chapter, to which all not lawfully excused are
bound to come. Let them, while new to the busi-
ness, invite, for advice as to procedure, two of the
neighbouring cistercian abbats as being accustomed
to such meetings ; 1 and to these must be elected
other two of their own, and the four shall preside
over the assembly. But let these presidents take
heed lest they claim any superiority ; for if it is
found expedient they may, after due deliberation, be
changed. The chapter must last for several days,
after the manner of the cistercians ; and it is to treat
of such things as the reformation of the order and
of regular observance. Whatever is decided and is
approved of by the four presidents is to be held
as binding upon all. Before the chapter closes,
the date of the next one must be fixed. Those who
attend must lead the common life, and bear pro-
portionately their share of the expenses. If room
cannot be found for them all in one house, then
1 The first cistercian chapter was held by St. Stephen Harding at
Citeaux, 11 16.
36 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
several together are to lodge elsewhere. Certain
men of religious circumspection are to be chosen
by the chapter as visitors of every abbey in the
province or kingdom. They are to visit in the
pope's name both monks and nuns ; and correct
and reform what they find amiss. If on visitation
they find it necessary that any abbat or prior should
be deposed, they are to denounce him to his own
bishop that he may remove him. If the bishop
will not do so, then the case is to be referred to
the judgment of the See Apostolic. Any difficulty
that may arise in the application of this decree has
also to be referred to the pope. This decree also
is to be applied to all canons regular, each accord-
ing to their order. Moreover the bishops have to
take such heed to the state of the monasteries in
their dioceses, that when the capitular visitors
come, they may rather find matter for commendation
than correction. The bishops are also to take care
that their monasteries are not over-taxed by the
visitors, for while the Holy See desires to guard all
rights of superiors, she has no wish to injure the
subjects. The pope also distinctly orders both
bishops and presidents of chapters, under pain of
censure, to compel all lay-folk to desist from wrong-
ing the monks in person or property ; and offenders
are to be compelled to make due satisfaction, so
that the divine service may go on with all freedom
and peace.
Nowhere was the decree so loyally observed, both
THE BENEDICTINE CONSTITUTION 37
in letter and spirit, as in England. Our monks put
it at once into force on the lines of the partition of
the ecclesiastical provinces of Canterbury and York.
No acts of the chapters held in the northern province
have come down to us, or, at least, have as yet been
printed.1 In the Apostolatus we have collected
decrees of a number held in the southern province.2
These meetings went on, at least, to 15 16, when
there was a general chapter held in Coventry.3
Three years after the Lateran Council, the pre-
lates of the province of Canterbury were holding a
chapter in September 12 18 at Oxford. The sessions
were put off until the 14th of September 12 19,
when it again met at St. Albans. Its presidents
were the abbats of Evesham and St. Augustine's,
Canterbury, both of whom had assisted at the
Lateran Council. The southern province does not
seem to have availed itself of the help of any cister-
cian abbats. Perhaps the two presidents, fresh from
Eome, felt quite capable of conducting the business
of chapter without any outside help. From 12 18
to 1300 we have traces of no less than twenty-four
of these provincial chapters. Oxford and its neigh-
1 The acts of one chapter of the northern province seemed to have
been in the hands of Dom Baker: "et aliud (Capitulum) Eboraci
circa annum 1266 cujus acta habentur et exordium eorum authentice
discriptum ad tendere possumus" (Apostolatus, ii. 39). This chapter
is mentioned in Hist. Dunelm. Scriptor. tres (Surtees Society), p. 48,
in terms which imply a standing institute.
2 See also Downside Review, vol. v. p. 59.
3 See the Statutes in the Appendix to vol. iii. of Historia et Cartu-
larium Monasterii Sti. Petri, Gloucestrice (Roll Series), pp. 298, 299.
38 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
bourhood seems to have been the usual place of
meeting, though Glastonbury, Evesham, London,
and Northampton were favoured, as well as St.
Albans and Reading. In 1236-37 a general chapter,
seemingly of all, was held in London preparatory
to the opening of the legatine Council of Otho. At
this council the legate passed a decree (No. 19)
concerning the use of flesh meat. The Italian was
judging of the state of English monasticism by
what he had been accustomed to in his own warmer
land. He says he had gladly heard that the abbats
of the order throughout England had lately held
a chapter in which they enforced perpetual absti-
nence according to the Rule of St. Benedict ; l which
decree he now confirms. This change, however, was
soon found impracticable ; and in the provincial
chapter held in 1300 at Oxford, under the presidency
of the abbat of Westminster, a decree was passed
to dispense with it, as impossible to be kept under
the circumstances. This chapter also did away with
the number of extra vocal prayers which had been
accumulating since the days of St. Dunstan. The
meeting at Oxford, 21st September 1253, seems to
have been one of both provinces.2
It was not long, however, before the benedictine
provinces of Canterbury and York were united into
one general chapter of a Congregation, coextensive
1 And, it appears, in accordance with the legate's wishes.
2 Annates de Theokesberia, ed. Luard, p. 153 ; Annates de Wintonia,
ed. Luard, p. 94.
THE BENEDICTINE CONSTITUTION 39
with the country. The Lateran decree had been
only fully carried out in England, and nowhere
else. Therefore in 1334 Benedict XII. issued from
Avignon on June 20th the famous bull called
the Benedictina, which enforced the Lateran de-
cree and extended its scope. The abbats of St.
Albans and of St. Mary's, York, one for each pro-
vince, were charged by the Holy See to execute
the bull in England. It is a long document, and
consists of thirty-nine chapters. As it is one of
the most important pieces of legislation for the
Order ever issued by the Holy See, it will be well
to give here a brief resume of its more important
clauses.
After having re-enforced the decree of the Lateran
Council about triennial chapters, which affects all
superiors, abbats Cathedral and other conventual
priors, the pope orders those who cannot attend
personally to send proxies, otherwise they are to be
fined a double amount of the usual tax levied for
chapter expenses. The power of the presidents is
to last from chapter to chapter. The two provinces
of Canterbury and York are to unite and form only
one chapter. (I.) Visitors are only to stay two days
at any house when on visitations ; and on such
occasions there are to be no feastings ; neither is
money allowed to be received or offered excepting
for the bare expenses. Penalties are inflicted against
those who infringe this law. (II.) Besides the
general chapter ; every year a chapter of each parti-
4o THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
cular house has to be held. (III.) The general
chapter has power of taxation for general purposes.
(IV.) In every house in which there are at least six
monks, the daily conventual chapter is to held.
(V.) In every house a properly paid teacher is to be
appointed to instruct the monks in Grammar, Logic,
and Philosophy. Seculars are not to be taught with
the monks. (VI.) One monk in twenty must be
sent to the universities for higher studies, and he is
to have a fixed allowance. Superiors, under penal-
ties, have to seek advice as to whom they send to
the university. (VII.) Pensions are to be paid to
students according to their rank, out of which they
must find food, clothes, books, &c. A prior of the
home of studies is to be appointed by the presi-
dents. Each monk-student has once a month to
send in his list of belongings. (VIII.) Then, after
chapters on the general management of monastic
houses regarding business matters (IX. to XXV.),
come these laws. Every Wednesday and Saturday,
and every day in Advent and from Septuagesima
to Easter are days when flesh meat is forbidden
to monks unless superiors judged well to dis-
pense in individual cases. All are to sleep in
one dormitory, separate cells being strictly for-
bidden except for students who can use them for
purposes of study but not for sleeping. (XXVI.)
In monasteries all priests are to celebrate at least
twice or thrice a week. Those who are not priests
confess at least once a week and communicate once
THE BENEDICTINE CONSTITUTION 41
a month.1 (XXVII.) The rest of the decrees con-
cern benefices and other ecclesiastical injunctions of
no general interest.2
This bull was duly announced by the two abbats
by letters dated March 10, 1337, and a chapter ap-
pointed to be held at Northampton, at the cluniac
monastery of St. Andrew, on the following June 10th
for the publication of the bull. Northampton was
chosen as being most accessible ; and the pope
allowed the holding of chapters, if more convenient,
in houses belonging to another Order.
On June 10, 1338 (Wilkins gives this date), the
first united chapter was held as arranged.3 The
abbat of York said the mass, and afterwards he
of St. Albans preached in Latin prout decuit. As
soon as the chapter had begun its session, a royal
messenger, one Master Philip, a cleric of London,
was announced. He brought letters from the king
forbidding the fathers to do aught contrary to the
royal prerogative or to the laws of the land. The
1 The old rule laid down in the Concordia Regularis was daily
Communion ; even on Good Friday ; and the reason was given in the
words of St. Augustine: "Because in the Lord's Prayer we do not
ask for our yearly but for our daily bread. ... So live as to be wrorthy
to receive every day ; for he who is not worthy to receive daily is not
worthy to receive once a year " (Lib. de Verbis Domini). It must be
remembered that the wording of the Benedictina was made to apply
to all countries, the names of Canterbury and York being only inserted
in the copy sent to England. Hence the regulation in Chapter XXVII.
does not go to prove that in England, at least, monks had fallen off
from their old practice.
2 Wilkins, Concilia, vol. ii. pp. 585-613.
3 Ibid. p. 626.
42 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
session was prorogued for two days to consult how
to satisfy the king and obey the pope's commands ;
which they were able to do by showing the meeting
to be concerned only with their own internal affairs.
After this they proceeded to business, and the abbats
of Westminster, Gloucester, and Bardney were chosen
presidents. The bull was formally read, and was
ordered to be kept at Westminster, as the most
secure place of deposit. Visitors were nominated
for the whole of England, and a commission was
appointed, now that the two provinces were united,
to overlook the decrees of the former provincial
chapters and decide what was to be kept as binding
upon the whole Congregation.
These chapters, held then at fixed intervals until
the Dissolution, were regularly representative bodies,
consisting not only of the heads of the houses,
but also of ordinary monks deputed by their fellow-
religious to attend. The records of some of these
chapters still exist, and are full of interest, showing
as they do the practical working of the system. For
instance, at the third provincial chapter of the year
1343 some modifications by Clement VI. of the bull
of Benedict XII. were read.1 A demand was made
to chapter by the cardinals who had brought out the
bull, for payment of 300 crowns as their expenses,
and threats were used in case of non-payment. The
king took the matter into his own hands and for-
bade any such payments. An important decree was
1 Wilkins, Concilia, vol. ii. pp. 713-15.
THE BENEDICTINE CONSTITUTION 43
passed, to the effect that all provisions of former
chapters were to be considered as revoked unless
reaffirmed by each succeeding chapter. In another
(1422), a stop was put to excessive cavalcades on
the part of those who came to the meeting. No
one, however dignified, was to have a train of more
than twenty horses.1
Abbats were ordered to look after their monks
and to live among them, especially on feast days.
They were not to be absent from the monastery
more than three months in the year ; and were to
be careful to spend Easter with their brethren. The
abbats agree once a year to make a full statement
to their monks of everything which concerns the
abbey. Their power of alienation was checked.
From September 15th to Lent no supper was to
be allowed except to the aged, sick, and those
below twenty years of age. A decree allowing of
eating meat was also passed, for the reason that
doctors and experience both teach that a total
abstinence from flesh is contrary to nature and
hurtful to the system : so were monks to be
confined to such diet alone, they would become
weak and suffer, a thing the rule neither orders
nor desires."
The visitations ordered by chapter were realities
and no merely formal visits. The reports were read
at the succeeding chapter. For instance, the abbat
of St. Albans, who had been appointed visitor of
1 Ibid. vol. iii. p. 419.
44 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
St. Augustine's, Canterbury, reports to the fathers
assembled, in 1426,1 that he was grieved to have
found something there needing correction, about
which he would later on confer with them more
fully. The abbat of Cerne, on the same occasion,
reports well of all the houses he had to visit, with
the exception of Abingdon, about which he too
had something to report privately to the president.
At Shrewsbury, too, he says, there were strifes and
a want of concord. We do not find any account
of capitular visitation of nunneries ; and are thereby
led to conclude that the houses of women were
not considered (although the Lateran decrees gave
the power of visitation) as being formally part of
the Congregation at all.
The general chapter was for some time exercised
as to the repeated contumacy of the monks of Christ
Church, Canterbury, who refused to appear when
summoned.2 They were warned and threatened with
fines and excommunication again and again. But
with no effect. The monks of Christ Church pro-
tested that, as being the mother-house of all bene-
dictines in England and, sede vacante, holding the
primatial jurisdiction, it beseemed not their dignity
to be summoned to any general chapter. If general
chapter there need be, theirs it was to summon it,
and to preside over its deliberation. In 1360 they
wrote, in the name of the king, to the pope ex-
1 Wilkins, Co7wilia, vol. iii. p. 464.
2 LitercB Cantuarienses, vol. ii. pp. 224, 398, 400, 448, 510.
THE BENEDICTINE CONSTITUTION 45
posing their woes and claiming exemption ; and in
1363 appointed proctors in Rome to carry on the
appeal. But- in 1373 the chapter still persisted
in its claim and began to threaten the monks of
Christ Church with further grave penalties, of
which the prior bitterly complains in a letter
to the archbishop. Five years later, Urban VI.
writes to archbishop Simon of Sudbury, and gives
full exemption to the monks of his cathedral-
monastery.
While the general chapter was exercising juris-
diction and sending visitors to the different abbeys
in the pope's name, we must not forget that these
same abbeys and other houses were also subjected
to the visitations of the bishops of the diocese.
The bishop was the ordinary of the whole diocese, •
and had to correct whatever was amiss in his flock.1
He could, if necessary, even dispose an abbat whom
he found unworthy, and thus obviate any difficulties
1 In the Constitutions of Giles of Sarum (1256), the bishop lays down
this decree for his monasteries : " Since by the rule of the holy fathers, \
religious men are bound to know by heart the psalms, hymns, and
certain other things to be read or sung according to their own ob-
servance, both in the night and day offices, we order that no one who
has entered now or at any future time a monastery in our diocese,
should he not know his office by heart, be promoted to any obedience
(i.e. any post of trust) unless it be a case of invincible ignorance. In
case of contravention of this law, both the appointer and the appointed
are suspended" (Wilkins, Concilia, vol. i. p. 718). The visitations
held in the diocese of Norwich, and published by the Camden Society,
show how strict and searching the visitations were ; and how much
indeed, up to the time of the Dissolution, depended upon the
bishop.
46 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
which might arise from life appointments. His
leave was necessary for an election, and he was
called upon to confirm the choice of the monks.
It was the bishop of the diocese who had to bless
the newly appointed abbat, and who had to keep
his eye upon him and see he did his duty. There
were in England only five abbeys exempt from
episcopal control, viz., St. Albans, Canterbury, St.
Augustine's, Westminster, Evesham, St. Edmund's
Bury. In these abbeys, although there was freedom
from the bishop's visitation, they were under the
capitular jurisdiction. Their elections depended on
the pope for confirmation, and they had to pay
heavily for the privilege.1 They had to go to Rome
in person or by proxy for confirmation ; and there
the chancery fees were enormous. In 1308 the cost
of papal confirmation for the election of Richard de
Sudbury, as abbat of Westminster, was no less than
8000 florins. Towards the end of the fifteenth
century they got dispensation from going or sending
to Rome, and had, instead, to pay a yearly tax of
200 florins to the papal collector.
Now to go back to the abbey in itself. As be-
comes a father of the family, the abbat held his post
for life. It was only for some grave reason that he
could be deposed. Religious orders, and congre-
1 They also had to pay heavy sums to the king for leave to elect.
In 1235 the monks of St. Albans had to pay the king 300 marks
(nearly ,£4000 of present money) for the privilege. — Gesta Abb. Sti. Alb.
(Roll Series), vol. i. p. 306.
THE BENEDICTINE CONSTITUTION 47
gations not belonging to the monastic state, find
in frequent changes of superiors advantages which
would by no means be such to monks. A dominican,
a franciscan, or a Jesuit, has no home in any one
house of his order more than another. He is here
to-day and gone to-morrow. But "home" is the
very idea of a benedictine monastery; and "home"
means oneness of surroundings and traditions, one-
ness of rule, of love and way of looking at things.
Around the monastery cling all those natural feel-
ings and sentiments which are the mainstay of
the family life. Here the monk is content to
live and die. Here will he dwell for ever, because
he has chosen it. Once more, "home" means one
father.1
Another point to which we have referred. The
benedictine has no outside work peculiar to him-
self. He can therefore, when called by obedience,
take up all or any. He may follow the contem-
plative life or the active ministry of the Apostolic
mission. He may teach or may write books. He
may plant trees and till the soil, or he may follow
Art in any of its many branches. He may convert
1 The learned benedictine bishop Hedley of Newport thus writes on
this subject : " Every benedictine monastery is, and ought to be, a home ;
whatever the external work to which a monk may find himself called, the
normal thing must always be, to live in his own monastery. It would
be a mistake to encourage any one to profess himself a benedictine
unless he could look forward with pleasure to live "for better for
worse " till death itself in the home of his profession, under the Eule,
and in the daily work of the choir."— Ampleforth Journal, April 1896,
p. 248.
48 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
the heathen or preside over the welfare of the
universal church from the Chair of Peter. Any
work a Christian may do, he may do. Whether he
takes up one form of work or changes to some
other, it is all one to him. He is still a benedictine.
He works for work's sake ; for the discipline it
gives to the soul ; for the avoiding of idleness ; and
for his own support ; for then, says St. Benedict,
" we are true monks when we live by the works of
our hands.'' 1 Hence the wideness of his spirit and
the elasticity of his rule, which adapts itself to any
work required by the circumstances and the time.
In a word, the benedictine life is not so much that
of an Order as it is a State of Life, the life of the
Evangelical Counsels.2
1 Begula S. Benedict^ cap. xlviii.
2 When we use the term " order," as applied to benedictines, it must
be remembered it has quite a different meaning to what it does when
used of the later religious bodies. In the benedictine meaning it is the
same as the term "state" in the "monastic state," and is analogous,
to the term " order" as when we speak of the clerical "order."
CHAPTER IV
THE MONK IN THE WORLD
Professing as he does to follow the ordinary
Gospel teaching, the monk cannot be unmindful
of the words, "Bear ye one another's burdens."1
Filled with the strength and the peace which has
entered his soul since his " conversion," 2 he is
always ready, when his abbat gives the word, to
labour for those left exposed to the cares and
dangers he has escaped. He is no misanthrope,
but is wise enough to know that the welfare of the
body is a great means towards securing the welfare
of the soul. For human misery, want, and poverty
are all so many obstacles in the way of Grace
working the change unto Life Eternal. Little is
the use of preaching to starving men, especially if
the preacher be himself well fed. Feed, clothe, and
house them ; and then will they be able to under-
stand that " Life is more than meat, and their
bodies more than raiment" 3 This common sense,
human way of looking at things, judging of others
1 Gal. vi. 2.
2 See the Conversio morum suorum of the monastic vows.
3 St. Matthew vi. 25.
VOL. I. 49 D
50 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
by the practical knowledge a man has gained of
himself, taught the monk to make his monastery
a centre for reaching the people among whom he
lived ; for an abbey was often possessed of vast
estates which afforded occupation and work to thou-
sands. The black monks were good landlords, who
lived in the midst of their tenantry and knew the
profit of keeping their people on the ground. The
personal welfare of their tenants, their comfort and
convenience, was as much a consideration to the
monks as were their own, and they were as well
looked after. Even with all the changes brought
about in land-holding as the result of the Black
Death, and the civil wars so impoverishing to any
country, the black monks, in spite of their genuine
distress, were but slow and sparing imitators of
those who had found it so profitable to inclose their
lands for pasturage.1
"As agriculturists and judicious managers of
property the monks of a benedictine house had no
equals. They were business-like, exact, and prompt
in their dealings. They required from their tenants
and servants a just and faithful performance of their
different services and tasks ; but whilst they did so
they were not hard or ungrateful masters. . . . The
constitutions and regulations contained in the Glou-
cester Cartulary . . . are, as I firmly believe, the
1 The cistercians were famous as wool-growers, and at one time seemed
to have had almost a monopoly of the wool trade. Hence pasturage
was more important to them than agriculture.
THE MONK IN THE WORLD 51
production not of a parcel of drunken and besotted
monks, but of intelligent landlords and agricul-
turists who had a due care for the stewardship of
the things committed to their care. Agriculture was
one of the leading features of the Benedictine Order,
and in this the monks achieved a great success." *
Wherever there are great buildings, there work
will always be found for many. The bare keeping
in repair of places like Canterbury or Ely or
Peterborough must have meant a livelihood for
generations of artisans, and trained artisans too,
men whose artistic tastes were carefully cultivated.
There were also in the working of a great abbey
an example given of careful agriculture, of manage-
ment, of thrift, and of a higher ideal than could be
found elsewhere. All these must have tended to
elevate the tone of the people who dwelt near,
and been a means of culture which would infallibly
tell in the long run.
But these are indirect ways of helping one's
neighbours which perhaps are more efficacious as
not interfering with the spirit of sturdy inde-
pendence so important to a nation. There is a
difference between doing a thing for people, and
showing them how to do it for themselves ; and this
wras the policy the monks followed. But children
and the sick are cases which are helpless, and this
was fully recognised. The monks became the great
1 Mr. Hart's Introduction : Historia Monasterii Gloucesteris (Roll
Series), vol. iii. p. xciii.
52 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
educationalists of the day, and did not confine their
work to men of their own rank, but spread the
blessings of learning far and wide. For instance, as
early as the year 1198 the abbat (Sampson) of St.
Edmundsbury built and endowed a public school ;
while in the twelfth century the school of St. Albans,
successively under Neckham and Master Warin, was
of such fame that Matthew of Paris says: "There
was hardly a school in all England at that time more
fruitful or more famous either for the number or
the proficiency of its scholars." 1
It is interesting to note that Master Warin, a
secular, was nephew both to the abbat and the
prior ; and was " so like his uncles in dignified
demeanour, worshipful life, and in learning, that he
truly deserved to be called the nephew of such men,
or rather their brother." 2
The abbats of Evesham paid yearly ^io3 and
"borde and tabelying frely in the monasterie to one
scholemaster for the keeping of a free schole in the
said town of Evesham." 4
Westminster, Glaston, and all the great houses kept
free schools in their own towns and on the various
properties they held up and down the country.5
1 Memoirs of St. Edmund's Abbey (Roll Series), vol. i. p. 296. There
was also a school at Beccles kept up by the same convent (ibid. vol.
iii. p. 182).
2 Gesta Abbatum, vol. i. pp. 195-6.
3 Equal to about £ 1 20 of our money.
4 H. Cole, King Henry the Eighth's Scheme of Bishoprics, p. 117.
6 For instance, the royal monastery at Westminster had possessions-
in 97 towns, 17 hamlets, besides 216 manors.
THE MONK IN THE WORLD 53
The claims of the sick, of the really poor, and of
the wayfarer were looked to. Where was the natural
resource for all in need or distress, but at the great
abbey? Food and shelter would be freely found at
God's house for those who wanted ; and the dole
would not pauperise the receivers. Day by day at
stated hours were the poor fed at every religious
house ; and guest-rooms were built to shelter those
who wanted to stay. For two days and nights were
travellers made welcome ; and during that time, if
their health allowed, they followed, as at Abingdon,
the spiritual exercises of the convent.1 They fared
the same as did the monks. When their time was
up, they were bidden god-speed and went on their
journey, sure of finding the same hospitality in the
next religious house at which they stopped. The
neighbouring poor had their daily dole ; and from
the monastic dispensaries the sick could always have
the medicines and attendance they required. In
fact, " the myth of the fine old English gentleman,
who had a large estate and provided every day for
the poor at his gate, was (as the late Professor J. S.
Brewer said) realised in the case of the monks, and
in their case only." 2
Not in bodily help only did they provide for the
people, but they looked also after their spiritual
profit. For dependent on the abbey were also many
tracts of land up and down the country, left as alms
1 MS. Cott., Claud., B. VI. f. 206.
2 Geraldi Cambr. Opera, ed. J. S. Brewer, IV. p. xxxvi.
54 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
to the monks.1 These lands, while sources of income,
also brought responsibilities. For the monks became
not only the temporal landlords but also the spiritual
pastors, and were obliged to look after the souls of
their people. But as the very idea of an abbey is,
as we have said, that of a home, it would not be in
1 Archdeacon W. Hale, writing on the question of patronage and
tithes, says : " It is a prevalent idea that we owe our parochial system
to the centralised operation of bodies of clergy united under a bishop
at the cathedral who went forth to preach, and who planted churches
throughout the diocese, the mother-church being their parent as well
as their head. Whatever truth there may be in this opinion, we
regret to observe that it derives little support or confirmation from
those notices respecting patronage and tithes which are scattered
throughout this volume. If the bishops and their clergy were the
original cause of churches being built, the churches themselves appear
very soon to have become possessions of the laity, and, together with
lands and manors, to have passed as patrimony from father to son. It
is a remarkable fact that there is not a single church mentioned in this
volume the patronage of which, in the times before the Conquest, did not
accrue to the monastery of Worcester from gifts made by laymen. . . .
But though all the rights of patronage which the monastery of Worcester
possessed were in the earliest times derived from the laity, it is worthy
of remark that, as respects the receipt of tithes from churches of which
the monastery were patrons, there is a marked difference in the case of
churches received before the Conquest and after that event. From the
churches of the former period tithes as well as pensions were generally
received ; from the churches of the later period pensions alone. It
would seem, too, from the fact of the Prior, the Sacristan, or the
Almoner receiving portions of the great tithes of the churches given
to the monastery in the earlier period, that the appropriation of tithes
to religious houses and the establishment of vicarages have a much
earlier origin than is commonly supposed." — Introduction to the
Registrum Prioratus B.M. JVigorniensis, pp. xxvi., xxvii. (Camden
Society, 1865). This raises the question whether the prevalent ideas
are not theories based on fancy, and whether the origin of so many
parish churches is really not due to the monks. The whole matter
requires reconsideration on the basis of an investigation into facts.
THE MONK IN THE WORLD 55
keeping to send monks out away from their cloister
for any length of time to do the work of parochial
clergy.1 Sometimes it was so done, according to
Kennet ; but the result was not satisfactory ; and
from an early date, in many monasteries, they began
to look about for secular priests to do this duty for
them. Hence rose the present system of Vicars.
Difficulties of administration came, and there were
cases in which the monks did not always act fairly
to their vicars. For when a church was appropriated
or impropriated 2 it was always stipulated that a
certain proportion of the income was to go to the
priest who did the work. For instance, when in 1 1 70
the living of Lamberton was appropriated to Tavis-
tock abbey by Bartholomew, bishop of Exeter, he
declared in the deed of gift that the monks " should
1 There was a marked difference in the position of the black monks
and the white monks respecting this question of monastic vicars. The
policy of the cistercians was to overcrowd their houses ; and when there
came a time of agricultural depression, they had to cast about how to live.
From the very nature of their organisation a sort of general policy
ensued. With the benedictines, on the contrary, the policy was to
restrict the community to the number the foundation would support.
With the independence of each house, difficulties were met according
to local views and circumstances.
2 Impropriation is the alienation of titles to laymen. Appropriation
is the assignment of them to clerical corporations, which thus became
responsible for the performance of the duties. It is calculated that
within 300 years of the Conquest about one-third of the benefices in
England had fallen by appropriation into the hands of the religious
orders, sees, colleges, &c. That abuses came from this is natural ; for
corporations are never as active in the discharge of duties as individuals
are. On the whole question see Rennet's Case of Impropriations and
Sheldon On Tithes.
56 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
hold it on the terms expressed in that donation, viz.,
one half to the abbat and monks, and the other
moiety to the vicar." 1
The general rule seems to have been for the
monastery to receive two thirds, and the vicar
one.2 This at first seems an unfair division ; but
when we consider that the monks undertook the
repairs of the church, which in many cases they
themselves had built at their own cost, and also
held themselves responsible for all the poor of the
parish, it is pretty clear that Master Vicar, who
got his one-third clear, a house free of rent, and
all his stole fees and dues, was by no means in
so unfavourable a position as some modern writers
make out.
But often, it appears, the monks did not keep to
their bargains, especially when the churches were
far away from the abbey. The vicars began to
complain, and complained so loudly that it reached
the Court. Eichard II. passed a law securing a
proper maintenance to the priest who served the
1 Rennet's Case of Impropriations, p. 40. Spelman, The Larger
Treatise concerning Tithes (1647), p. 151.
2 This was on the lines of the old canonical division : one third
for the support of the Church, or, as it was called, for God ; one
third for the Poor ; and one third for the Priest. St. Gregory, in his
letter to St. Augustine (Bede, Book I. chapter 27), speaks of and
recommends the custom of a fourfold division, a share for the bishop
being included. It is difficult to say the exact proportions that
obtained in England, but the principle was there ; the burthen and
the profits were divided between patrons and priests. See also
Lingard's Antiquities of the Anglo-Saxon Church, p. 83.
THE MONK IN THE WORLD 57
churches the monks either had built or had received
together with the land at the time of gift.1
Henry IV. went further, and altogether forbade
the monks to act as parochial clergy, and ordered
them to institute to the livings members of the
secular clergy.2
The monks, as patrons, retained however the
rights of presentation, as we find expressed in the
Privileges of St. Alban's abbey (1257) : —
" Item that we may make choice of priests for
them, and present them to the diocesan of the
place, and assign to them their portions ; the which
priests shall be answerable to the ordinaries of the
place in spirituals3 and to us in temporals."
The bishop was obliged to institute their nominee
unless there was some canonical objection. The
vicars, who were either for life or removable at
will, had to swear fidelity to the abbat and convent,
and pay each year certain sums as rectorial first-
fruits. These payments were often assigned to
divers officers of the abbey, obedientiaries as they
were called, for the discharge of their office. For
instance, the profits of a certain set of vicarages
would go to the Sacristan or to the Precentor, or
1 e.g. Glaston had no less than seventy-one churches dependent
upon it.
2 Dixon's History of the Church of England, vol. i. p. 89.
3 Sometimes, as at St. Albans or Evesham, the abbat was ordinary
of the place, and had the rights of archdeacons. There is a curious
verse containing sixteen " reserved cases " in the jurisdiction of St.
Albans. See Rev. P. Newcome's The History of the Abbey of St. Albans,
p. 221.
58 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
to the Infirmarian. Sometimes in the deed of gift
the land or church was left for a specified purpose ;
even (as there were cases) for providing a better
brew of beer for the brethren, or an extra pitance on
the anniversary day of the donor.1 In other cases
it was the abbat who allotted the means of revenue
for each department. There were often charges,
too, upon the gift which materially lessened the
value to the monks, in the shape of corrodies2 to
different friends or relatives of the donor. These
charges went on sometimes for generations.
The system of vicars in churches appropriated to
benedictines, may seem to have put the secular
clergy into an undue state of dependence. But a
1 A pitance, from pietas, was an extra dish over and above the
monastic commons, and was given out on special days — such as feast
days, anniversaries. It might take the form of dessert, or of eggs, or
of an extra amount of fish or even meat. St. Benedict provides for
it in his Rule (Gh. XXXIX.) : " If, however, their work chance to
have been hard, it shall be in the abbat's power, if he think fit, to
make some addition " (to their usual allowance), " avoiding above every-
thing all surfeiting, that the monks be not overtaken by indigestion."
A practical warning when men ate generally only once a day.
2 A corrody was a monk's portion of food and drink. One given
by the abbat of Tavistock to John Amadas in the time of Henry
VIII. consisted of "one white loaf, another loaf called ' Trequarter ; '
a dish called ' General,' another dish of flesh or fish called ' Pitance ' ;
three potells of beer or three silver halfpence daily ; also a furred
robe at Christmas yearly, of the same kind as those of our esquires,
or the sum of 20s." Whenever John chanced to be at the abbey, he
was to have a proper chamber, with firing and three candles called
" Paris candells " ; and also stabling for his horse. When the abbey
was dissolved, the king ordered the corrody to be commuted into a
yearly pension for the lucky John of an annuity of £$ in lieu of
all these daily comforts and perquisites. See Preface to Oliver's
Monasticon Diocesis Exoniensis, p. vi.
THE MONK IN THE WORLD 59
consideration will show if there were dependence
it would also be that begotten of gratitude. For it
must be remembered it was from the free schools
kept by the monks that most of the clergy got their
education, and thence the very means of entering
the priesthood. For, by the common law of the
Church which then obtained, no cleric could be
ordained unless he had a "title" ; or in other words
some one to fall back upon, who undertook in case
of need to be responsible for his support : and these
titles had to be obtained from those who had them
and were willing to present. In a note attached to
his work on Henry VIII. and the English Monas-
teries, Dom F. A. Gasquet points out that in the
diocese of York, between the years 1501 and 1539,
there were 6190 priests ordained. Of this number
141 5 were religious of various kinds; 4698 were
seculars presented on titles furnished by a monastery
or college, and only 77 on a title provided else-
where. The yearly average of ordinations was over
158. When the troubles began for the monas-
teries these numbers fell at once. In 1536, 92
only were ordained priests; in 1537 no ordinations
are recorded; in 1538 only 20; and in 1539 only
8.1 So that, were it not for the monasteries, secular
priests would have hardly had any means of living.
It was not only the civil law which looked after
the interests of the vicars. The Church was provi-
dent also. At that time the usual stipend for a
1 Vol. i. p. xxx.
60 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
chaplain was 5 marks (about ^40) a year, and this
was advanced to 6, 8, and 10 marks, which latter
sum equals about ^80/
But provincial constitutions settled that the
portion allowed to vicars should never be less than
12 marks a year; that is to say, close upon ^ioo,2
an income considerably better than Goldsmith's
Vicar, who was " passing rich on forty pounds a year,"
and who had a wife and family to boot.
The monasteries were also schools for the nobility.
Under the care of the abbat were youths often
of the highest rank, who were to be brought up
in the courtesy and polite education which made
the monasteries far better schools for Christian
gentlemen than the Court. For the abbey had its
friends throughout the country ; and the abbat of
the greatest houses, being generally a peer of the
realm, had his seat in Parliament and entered into
the council of kings. So he and his monastery were
well known to the great. Besides, there were other
ties. Many members of noble and gentle families
were monks themselves, and to these the benedic-
tine, whatever his birth, was akin through the
discipline of his life, his circumstances and his
surroundings, and through that tone and bearing
which come to him who lives habitually in God's
sight. Many of the great ones of the land wished
to be united in some kind of spiritual bonds with
1 Kennet, ibid. pp. 57, 58.
2 Lyndewood's Provinciate (ed. Oxford, 1679), ^e °ffic^° Vicarii, p. 64.
THE MONK IN THE WORLD 61
an abbey where they had relatives or friends ; and
we find them suing for admission to friendship or
confraternity with the monks. The effects of this
confraternity were that they became real members
of the house and shared in all its good works and
merits. The Confrater was sometimes allowed an
honorary seat in the chapter. Special prayers were
offered for him at his death, and his anniversaries
were kept with Dirge and Eequiem. He, on his
side, promised always to befriend the abbey and to
help and protect it to the best of his abilities. The
petitioner for confraternity would present himself
in the chapter-house before the assembled monks,
and there prostrate himself until the abbat asked,
" What asketh thou ? " to which he answered, " I ask
through God's mercy and yours, and that of all the
elders, the brotherhood and goodwill of this monas-
tery." The abbat then said, " May the Almighty
Lord grant thee what thou seekest, and may He give
thee a fellowship with His elect." The petitioner
then knelt at the abbat's feet who gave him the book
of the Rule, and, both putting their hands on the
sacred text, said: "We admit thee into fellowship
and into brotherhood. Now as thou art henceforth
for ever a sharer even as one of ourselves in the
masses, hours, prayers, watches, disciplines, fasts,
alms, and other spiritual good deeds that are done
in this church, let us also be made partakers in thy
good works." He was then received to the kiss of
peace by all the convent, and was entered in the chart
62 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
as a confrater. Kings and princes considered it an
honour to become confratres of abbeys. William
the Conqueror was a confrater of Cluni and also
of Battle abbey, which he had founded. In 1460
Henry VI. coming to Croyland, and being delighted
with the religious life of the monks, stayed three
days and begged to be admitted into their brother-
hood ; which being granted him, he, in return,
gave them his charter whereby their liberties l were
confirmed.
High ecclesiastics, like Wolsey at Evesham in
1 5 16, sought for fellowship ; or great officers of State,
as Blessed Thomas More,2 " Lord Chancellor of this
most flourishing kingdom of England," at Christ
Church, Canterbury, where he had been a boy at
school. The neighbouring nobility and gentry were
eager to be on good terms with the monks, and their
names, still extant on some of the registers which
have come down to us, show that the privilege was
highly prized.
But this connection with the great was not without
its disadvantages too ; for monasteries became not
only the shelter for the poor, but also for the rich.
They were the hotels of the day. Kings and nobles
put up with the monks, and often over-stayed their
welcome, filling the place with their retinues and
disturbing the peace of the cloister. A favourite
time for the royal visitors to spend some weeks at
1 Steven's Additions to Dugdale, vol. i. p. 374.
2 See Report of Historical MSS. Com., vol. i. p. 121.
THE MONK IN THE WORLD 63
an abbey were the holiday seasons of Christmas, of
Easter, of Whitsuntide. He would add the majesty
of his presence and of all his train to some function
in the Church, and the splendour of the celebration
of such or such a feast would remain long in the
memories of monk and people to whom the Church's
ceremonies were living realities. The monasteries also
afforded asylums to honourable families in reduced
circumstances. Dom Gasquet produces a letter from
the son of the duke of Buckingham to Henry VIII.
in which the writer says that he " hath no dwelling
place meet for him to inhabit (and he was) fain to
live poorly at board in an abbey this four years day,
with his wife and seven children." *
They were also often called upon to provide
pensions and grants to favourites, and thus vicari-
ously pay for services done to their royal patrons.
" In some case the abbats were bound to give
endowments to scholars of the king's nomination or
provide them with competent benefices, pensions ; and
corrodies were granted under the privy seal to yeomen
ushers of the wardrobe and the chamber, to clerks
of the kitchen, servers, secretaries, and gentlemen
of the chapel royal; and these were strictly en-
forced, whatever might be the other encumbrances
of the house."2 The monks, although themselves
men of peace, had to provide their quota of knights
and men-at-arms for the royal service, and in the civil
1 D. Gasquet, " Henry VIII. and the English Monasteries" vol. i. p. 34.
2 Ibid. vol. i. pp. 28, 29.
64 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
wars so frequent in England soldiers were quartered
upon them.
Hence we may conclude, if the monks had vast
possessions they also had vast responsibilities, and
responsibilities to which they nobly rose. They
looked upon their wealth as so much entrusted to
them for the welfare of others. And if in times
of prosperity they knew how to spend lavishly, it
was more in the service of their neighbour than for
themselves. Their vast hospitalities, the exactions
of kings, social changes and disasters such as fires
and diseases,1 often crippled them and reduced them
to the verge of destruction, but they never forgot
the saying of the Lord : "It is more blessed to give
than to receive." 2 They went on their beneficent
way as long as their homes stood, "Doing good to
all, but especially to those of the household of the
faith."3
1 During the plague known as "the Black Death" (1348-49), the
monks, as well as the rest of the clergy, suffered severely. It is
calculated that about two-thirds of the clergy died. It is very likely
that the monastic orders would in proportion suffer more severely than
the parochial clergy, for the chance of infection is always greater when
there are a number together. At Westminster the abbat and twenty-
six monks died, and found a common grave in the southern cloister.
So it was all round, wherever the plague raged.
2 Acts xx. 35. 3 Gal. vi. 10.
CHAPTER V
THE MONK IN HIS MONASTERY
The question now arises : What was the private life
of those monks who thus spent themselves in the
service of God and their neighbours? What was
the secret of their life, the spring from which they
got their strength ? In this chapter we will en-
deavour to give a sketch of the life of a monk in
his monastery, and note the sort of effect on his
character of his vows.
But it is not possible for us to take an example
from any one particular house as typical of the rest.
First of all because we have but few references to
the inner life of any one monastery. W^here all went
on calmly and regularly, what need to record the
conditions of a life all knew and experienced daily ?
It is only on occasion of some important event that,
as it were by accident, the veil is lifted and for a
moment we catch a glimpse of cloister life. Even
had we a full and detailed account of some one
house, it would not necessarily tell us about the
particulars of the life in others.
But scattered here and there in our numerous
records are indications of what was done in various
vol. I. 6s E
66 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
houses, so that a picture, true in its details, as finding
a counterpart in real life, may be pieced together
and a sufficiently vivid picture given of the general
outlines of the life of an English monk in the later
mediaeval times. Whatever the local variations
might be (and in every house with a vigorous life of
its own, there would always be its own peculiar way
of looking at things and its own development, based
on conditions obtaining there and not elsewhere),
still, from the intrinsic power of the Eule and a
living tradition, there would be necessarily in every
house certain features which would find themselves
repeated in all benedictine monasteries. There
would be that peculiar tone amid all sorts of varia-
tions which clearly marks off the benedictine from
other religious, and which finds its root in the dis-
tinguishing feature of St. Benedict's Kule, the ample
discretion allowed in interpretation.
But in order to give a picture to the reader of the
inner life of a monk, we are obliged to combine in
one whole such details, gleaned from all parts, which
may be fairly considered as truly representative, in
the broad outlines, of life as it really existed through-
out England. Without dwelling unduly upon local
customs, save as far as they go to prove the existence
of a principle which would find its counterpart else-
where, we will throw into the form of an imaginary
biographical sketch what may be useful for our
present purpose. The facts are true ; but the reader
must bear in mind that the setting is imaginary.
THE MONK IN HIS MONASTERY 67
John Weston was a monk of Lynminster, an
abbey with a history counted by centuries. The son
of a knight, at an early age his widowed mother
had placed him in the claustral school at this, the
most famous abbey in the neighbourhood. Here his
father and uncles had also received such education
as had fallen to their lot. To this abbey he had been
offered by his mother, according to the old ceremony.
One day at mass, after the gospel, the chalice was put
into his hands and the priest wrapped up the child's
hands in the altar-cloth1 as a sign that he was, if
found worthy, to be dedicated to the service of God.
From his earliest days — he was but seven — he was
kept under strict discipline ; 2 and wore in the
monastery a form of the monk's dress, and had his
head shaven in the form of a crown. He was
taught along with other boys, perhaps in the free
school or in the singing-school, which most of the
great abbeys supported for the services of their
minsters. He had a sweet voice and some talent
in singing ; so it is likely he found a place in the
singing-school. The treatment was kind but severe.
If he became a monk, it were well he should know
from his earliest days that a monk had to work and
not live an idle life ; and if he returned to the world,
what better lesson could he take out than the great
law of labour ? John was taught among other things
1 Rule of St. Benedict, Ch. LIX.
2 " The children are to be kept under discipline at all times and by
.every one" (Rule, Ch. LXIIL).
68 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
reading, writing, his Latin grammar, some simple ele-
ments of the art of reckoning, his prayers and faith,
the laws of politeness, and the great art of holding
his tongue. Singing would not be forgotten. Plain-
song and prick-song had mysteries the knowledge of
which was highly considered ; and beside John, with
all his companions, had to attend in the great minster
every day and sing at the solemn mass and vespers.
While there was a good deal of solid instruction
going on, and a good deal of knowledge was being
instilled into him, the boy's mind was being educated
and its powers developed. He was quietly and un-
consciously drinking in the influence of the place.
His character was forming itself to habits of industry,
self-restraint, thrift, charity in his dealings with
others ; and he was gaining a sense of the reality of
life. All he saw in the lives of those with whom he
passed his days ; their earnestness and diligence, their
prompt obedience to the abbat, and their frequent
little practices of humility, and above all the solemn
chanting of the office and the daily sacrifice, acts
not of this earth, all these must have had their effect
on the boy. The more so as it was the outcome of
what he saw and observed for himself, more than
anything said or preached at him. For at Lynminster
there was little of that sort of thing. Monks after
St. Benedict's mind are not what the world thinks
them to be. Religion being the very atmosphere in
which they live, God's side of every question comes
so natural to them, so much a matter of course, that
THE MONK IN HIS MONASTERY 69
there is no trying to be always "improving the
occasion " nor striking attitudes, mental or otherwise,
which are foreign to their simple idea of what He
requires. The monks preferred, if God was calling
the boy, to let Him do His own work in His own
way. They dared not force or hurry on what they
knew was in wiser hands than theirs.
John was a boy, merry of heart and full of life and
fun, as all healthy English boys are ; and though
these qualities have to be regulated like everything
else, yet, as they are most valuable, his teachers
were careful not to repress them too much. He,
no doubt, was mischievous as others are, and had
his fling of boyish spirits. Nor was he without
his share in all the sports and manly excitements
suitable to his age and condition. These were all
useful to make him what he ought to be — a reason-
able being, giving a reasonable service to his Maker.
There is one thing abhorrent to all benedictine
ideas of education, and that is the formation of
the prig. So we may be sure the result in the
case of John Weston was not that.
For some time, since his fourteenth year, there
had been going on a gradual awakening of the
boy's soul ; and he was beginning to question him-
self. The old problems we have all had, doubt-
lessly, presented themselves over and over again :
"What is the meaning of Life? Why was I
made 1 " Sometimes in the midst of his play or
of his study, maybe when singing the Credo at
7o THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
high mass or the Magnificat at vespers, a serious-
ness and awe would fall upon him ; and something
('twas the Voice of God, but, at first, he knew it
not) whispered to him: "God made you for Him-
self." The truth sank deeper and deeper in his soul,
and he began to realise it was a personal and entire
service God asked of him. And day by day the
example he saw began to tell more and more on the
lad. "The monks are serving God. That is why
they are here. How peaceful and happy they are."
Such thoughts as these flashed across his mind ; and
the high ideal of life which the monastic state aims
at began to attract him.
Then came one day, never to be forgotten ; a
great light dawned upon his soul. God spoke to
him clearly and distinctly in one of the many
ways He speaks to His creatures. Maybe it was
some sudden sorrow, the death of his mother
or of some other loved friend ; or perhaps some
sudden inrush of joy at a realisation of God's
Fatherhood ; or some word of the daily-heard office
which suddenly broke upon him with a new mean-
ing and struck home ; or maybe some sin into
which he had fallen and which mercifully revealed
to him his own weakness : I must give myself to
God ; and " Here will I dwell for ever." 1 With heart
full of emotion and joy at his call, he told his
master the hope he dared hardly express. But
the monk, skilled in the art of counsel, while
1 Ps. xxiii. 6.
THE MONK IN HIS MONASTERY 71
giving him encouragement also set before him in
grave words the hardness of the life to which he
aspired, and the sacrifices he would have to make.
He spoke, doubtlessly, too of the sweetness there
is for them whom God calls to serve Him. So he
wisely bids the lad pray, and wait a while, and try
himself, lest the desire may come from human
motives rather than from God. If the good monk
knew that the lot of those who have entered the
cloister to follow God is sweet beyond words, on
the other hand he knew full well that those who
come into the fold not by the door of Vocation, may
expect nothing but unhappiness and bitterness.
After much prayer and trial, John, now in his
nineteenth year, has persevered, and in the chapter-
room has been admitted by the abbat, and clothed
as a novice.1 No longer a mere school-boy, he
1 "The Book of Ely," f. 106 [Lambeth MSS., No. 448], contains the
outfit required in that cathedral-monastery by a novice.
Necessaria noviciis noviter ad religionem venientibus providenda.
Imprimis i matras (matrass).
Item ii par blankettys.
Item ii par straglys (quilts).
Item ii couverlytes.
i furrypane.
i blewbed de sago (bed- curtains of serge).
i cuculla cum froco (cowl and frock).
i tunica nigra furra (black furred tunic).
Item i tunica nigra simplex (for summer wear).
Item ii tunica alba.
i amita simplex (amuce).
i zona, cum i powch, cultela, tabula et pectine, filo et acu
in les powch.
Item i parva zona pro noctibus.
Item
Item
Item
Item
Item
Item
72 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
wears the habit, and is given into the charge of
the novice master, whose duty it will be to train
him in the spiritual life. In the noviciate the real
work was one more of education than instruction.
Dom or " Dan " 1 John, as he was now called, was
shown, as it were, two mirrors. One reflected the
image of what God intended him to be ; and the
other what he really was, with all his faults and
weakness. He was a true novice ; he read the
pictures aright. St. Benedict has given his monks
seventy-two " instruments " by which they are to
Item iii par staraainorum (woollen under-garments).
Item iiii par bracarum (breeches), cum brygerdel (a kind of belt)
et poyntes (garters).
Item ii par caligarum (shoes).
Item iiii par de le sokke.
Item ii par botarum pro diebus.
Item i par botarum pro noctibus.
Item i pylche (a pilche, a fur garment = toga pellieea).
Item iii par flammeole (kerchief ? v. Du Cange).
Item iii pulvonaria (pillows or cushions).
Item i pileo albo pro noctibus (nightcap).
Item ii manutergia (towels).
Item i pokett pro vestibus lavandis (soiled clothes-bag).
Item i schavyn cloth.
Item i crater a bowl (lamp ? v. Du Cange).
Item i ciphus murreus (a mazer goblet, generally of valuable
materials).
Item i coclear argent (silver spoon).
The above is interesting as showing that the English benedictine culti-
vated a certain amount of dignified manner of life. Everything was
good, simple, and plain. The cold moist climate of Ely, and in most other
English monasteries, made the use of fur in winter-time a necessity.
1 In old Catholic England monks kept their baptismal names, and
were known also by their surname, or the name of the place whence they
came. In the old lists that have come down to us most of the names
are territorial ; names, too, generally of places in the immediate neigh-
THE MONK IN HIS MONASTERY 73
work out their salvation. These were carefully
studied and their meaning and use examined ; and
with them Dom John, diligently and soberly, set to
work to make the two pictures correspond. He was
not expected in his novitiate to become suddenly
perfect. But he was expected to see his faults and to
show his determination to labour at their correction.1
Now there was one of his companions, Dom
Gilbert of London, a youth whom all loved ; one
kindly and thoughtful for all, devout at his prayer
and diligent at his books. But when he looked at
himself in the second mirror, he forgot what manner
of man he was, and sighed and gave up the attempt
at self-correction. He was wanting in the manliness
and determination needed for a monk. So he went
his way out into the great world ; and Dom Gilbert
was heard of no more. This failure was of use to
our Dom John. It made him humbler, and steadied
him down to a slower and surer growth. Perhaps
bourhood. As a monk used to be called either by his family or terri-
torial name, sometimes by one and sometimes by another, it is often
difficult to identify a name we come across. The practice of giving
new names, generally those of some saint, seems to have been intro-
duced at some places just before the dissolution occurred. It came
from abroad. We find them at Glaston under abbat Bere (1524),
who probably introduced the custom from Italy ; the names adopted
were generally " house " names, of saints to whom there was a special
local veneration. See also list of Bath monks in the Monasticon,
vol. ii. p. 271. In 1500 Richard Kidderminster, abbat of Winchcombe,
went to Rome on the affairs of his order and was there a year. " He
informed himself in learning, and improved himself in several useful
regulations belonging to a monastic life" (Dodd's Church History,
vol. i. p. 229). He also may have introduced the custom.
1 Rule, Ch. IV.
74 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
he had begun to run before he could walk, as
novices often try to do.
Besides thus setting his feet in the way of per-
fection, the master taught him the psalms and
hymns and responsories which had to be learnt off
by heart, since most of them would have to be sung
at matins, and at that early hour (midnight) there
would be but little light to read by. The books
he loved to watch the monks copying and illumi-
nating, were too precious for such as he. He must
make a copy for his own use from which to learn
them. Then there were the ceremonies to be got
up both for church and elsewhere. Conduct had
to be regulated according to a fixed method, which
was based upon a sense of the Presence of God,
and was no empty form. He would have to learn
also the language of signs, which was commonly
used in all religious homes, not as a means of con-
versation, but of expressing one's wants without
disturbing others. Then, no doubt to try him, at
times he would be put to do menial work, such
as the house servants did.1 For in those days in
English benedictine monasteries there were no lay-
brothers, but servants were kept to do the house-
hold work.
After his trial, generally a year, during which the
convent watched him narrowly to see whether they
would care to admit him into their family as a life-
long companion, and he, on his side, whether he
> Rule, Ck. LVIII.
THE MONK IN HIS MONASTERY 75
could live until death with them (for the profession
of a novice is a serious thing to those admitting
as well as to those admitted) ; and after the Rule
according to the injunctions of St. Benedict had
been read to him several times, together with the
warning, "Behold the law under which thou desirest
to fight. If thou canst observe it, enter in ; if thou
canst not, depart freely ; " 1 the abbat took counsel
with his monks, and they agreed to admit him to
profession. Then one morning the abbat sang
solemn mass, and during the solemnity Dom John
was led forward to the altar, and in the hearing of
all vowed Stability, Conversion of his Life, and
Obedience. Then, with arms outstretched, three
times did he sing the verse : " Uphold me, 0 Lord,
according to Thy Word, and I shall live; and let
me not he frustrated of my hope ;"2 and the whole
community repeated it as many times, adding there-
unto the Gloria Patri. Then, clothed in the full
monastic garb, the newly-received brother cast him-
self at the feet of all, begging them to pray for him
and receive him to the kiss of fraternal love. Dom
John Weston was now a monk.
What was his life, now that he had reached the
goal of his desires ?
He rose a little before two o'clock3 and was down
1 Rule, Ch. LVIII. 2 Ps. cxix. 116.
3 The hour for matins varied in each house. Some, as at Durham,
rose at midnight, while others, as at Westminster, got up at 2 p.m. In
all cases they went back to bed for the time between matins and lauds.
This was one of the changes Lanfranc introduced. According to the
76 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
in his stall ready to begin matins, the longest office
of all, which lasted from one hour and a half to two
or more hours. In the darkness of the night, while
the rest of the world was sleeping, Dom John took
his place among his cowled brethren and worshipped
God with psalm, and hymn, and canticle. Sometimes,
he listened to reading of Holy Writ or to one of the
fathers of the Church, and anon joined in some soul-
lifting responsory. The organ, too,1 added its solemn
strains to the voices and helped to lift his soul up to
Him Who dwelt there in sacramental presence over
the altar.2 This time of matins was one of the
happiest hours in his day ; for then he was fulfilling
one of his greatest privileges, " the work of God."
This, the liturgical prayer, was the source of his
strength. There lay the whole secret of his spiritual
life. For to a benedictine the liturgical spirit is all
Kule, monks are to rise for the night office at the eighth hour, a
varying period, which in winter would be, in the latitude of Eome,
about 3 a.m., and earlier in the summer, when the hours were shorter.
1 " The monks, when they were at their matins and service at mid-
night, then one of the said monks did play on the organs themselves
and no other." — Rites of Durham (Surtees Society), p. 54.
2 In monastic churches, as in all others at that time, it was an
unheard of thing to banish Our Lord to a side chapel. The Gospel
idea of prayer is that He is in our midst when we pray. The whole
value of our prayer (and the divine office is the prayer par excellence)
is that it is made with, by, and in Him who is the one Mediator
between God and man. The Church recognises this : and orders in
monastic churches the Blessed Sacrament to be kept at the high
altar (S. C. Epis., 10th Feb. 1579 and 29th Nov. 1594). Abbey churches
are not cathedrals ; and a custom warranted by the requirement of the
latter is no reason why, against all rule, such a practice should obtain
elsewhere..
THE MONK IN HIS MONASTERY 77
in all.1 He wants nothing more than the common
prayer of the Church. Every other devotion he con-
siders as nothing compared with its might and
ineffable dignity. It is " the Work of God" in its
fullest sense ; for the Divine Head of the Church
uses man as an instrument whereby He, the Incarnate
Word, praises the Eternal Father. Hence it is that
to a benedictine, brought up as Dom John was, the
office is the foundation of all his spiritual life.2
The long midnight office with its concluding lauds
being sung, back to bed goes Dom John, tired
indeed, but at peace.
At five o'clock, he again rose, this time for prime,
which was duly followed by chapter, at which he
1 "It is with this voice of the divine office the monk speaks not
only to his Creator, but to his fellow-men as well. The perpetual
round of prayer and praise is something more than an intercessory
power. It, rightly understood, is the medium of intercourse between
the monastic body and the people in the midst of which it dwells.
No one is so dull that he cannot understand the faith in the unseen,
the hope of another world and burning love of God which are mani-
fested in the perennial sacrifice and song of praise in the monastic
choir. Through the individual preaching of the monk, through his
works, through his words of counsel and of comfort, through his
hospitality, through his dealings with his fellow-men in all the varied
relations of life, he exercises some portion of his apostolate ; but the
choir of the monastery is the monk's real pulpit, and the daily office
his most efficient sermon." — From Dom Gasquet's Introduction to The
Monks of the West, p. xvii.
2 The monk's private prayer is affective or contemplative. Long and
formal meditations were not known in those days. St. Benedict pre-
scribes (Ch. XX.) that prayer be short and pure ; except it be perchance
prolonged by the inspiration of Divine Grace. " But," he adds, " let
prayer made in common always be short : and at the signal given by
the one presiding let all rise together."
78 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
had to make public confession of his breaches of the
llule and do penance.1 Here also he had to listen
to words of spiritual instruction from his abbat, and,
perhaps, receive directions about the work of the
day. After prime in winter, and before in summer,
he changed his night-habit for his day one and
washed.
At six the short chapter mass, generally of " Our
Lady Saint Mary," was sung, at which he assisted.
He then studied in the cloister till near to nine, when
the bell summoned him to choir again for the holy
hour of terce. This was followed by the central
act of the day, the sacrifice of the mass, celebrated
with all the wealth of ceremonial at the disposal of
the abbey. If it were a high feast day, the abbat
would pontificate, and wear his mitre ; 2 and Dom
1 The benedictine makes use of corporal austerities as a means of
keeping his body in subjection : according to St. Paul's words, " I
chastise my body" (i Cor. ix. 27). But his life is more ascetic than
austere. The discipline, besides that administered in punishment,
used to be taken publicly in chapter by all as a mortification. This,
which had hitherto been a private act, was introduced by St. Peter
Damian, and in all the convents he founded it was taken every Friday.
The custom soon spread, and we find traces of it at Evesham, Croyland,
and Christ Church, Canterbury. It probably became universal in the
later mediaeval ages. In the list of "Instruments of good works"
(Ch. IV.), St. Benedict, without specifying the particular means,
gives "To chastise the body" as a principle ; also "To fear the Day of
Judgment," and " To be in dread of hell." These are quite enough to
account for the growth of the practice of self-flagellation and other
usages of the ascetic life.
2 The first abbat in Christendom to get the rights of pontificalia
was the abbat of St. Augustine's abbey, Canterbury. The grant was
made by Pope Alexander II. in 1063, but Lanfranc would not allow
it to be used (Hist. Monast. S. August. Cantuar., Koll Series, p. 27).
THE MONK IN HIS MONASTERY 79
John might assist in the sanctuary and carry the
abbat's crosier unless he was wanted in the choir.
The sacrifice of the mass was the centre of all his
life, and the light of his day. To it, either as pre-
paration or thanksgiving, were directed all his prayers.
It was the mass that gave the meaning to his office,
and was the jewel of rare price which was set in the
gold of the psalter. At the altar, too, did he often
kneel and receive the bread of life and become
more and more united with Him his soul loved.
The mass was followed by the office of sext.
Then about eleven he had his first meal, if it were
not a fasting day, in which case he would break his
fast after nones or after vespers according as it
was a fast day of the Rule or the stricter fast of
the Church. The meal was eaten in silence. Dom
John sat with others at a table ; and a portion of
food was set in a dish between so many. A curious
account has been left of the food at Christ Church,
Canterbury, on a fish day. In this document we
read : —
"To every two monks, when they had soles, there
It was again renewed in 1 1 79, and a like privilege was granted to most
of the other abbeys. Most cathedral-monasteries seem to have ob-
tained the same privilege before the end of the fifteenth century, but
the priors seem to have been confined to the use of a knobbed staff
instead of the ordinary episcopal stave affected by the abbats. The
right of singing mass pontifically, of giving the solemn blessings and
singing vespers, was much prized by the abbats, and gave a dignity and
grandeur to the great festivals hitherto known only in cathedrals when
the bishop officiated. As a rule, the abbat only sang mass pontifically
seven or eight times a year. He had the right, too, of using his
pontificalia in any house or church belonging to his abbey.
8o THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
were 4 soles in a dish ; when they had plaice, 2
plaice ; when they had herring, 8 herrings ; when
they had whiting, 8 whiting; when they had
mackrell, 2 mackrell ; when they had eggs, 10
eggs. If they had anything more allowed them
beyond this ordinary fare, it was either cheese or
fruit or the like." 1
Canterbury is near the sea, so fish was abundant.
It must be remembered in estimating the allowance
that it was the only meal in the day, and the monks
had been up and at work nearly ten hours. Besides,
it is perfectly evident that in those days people ate
much more largely than we do. Bread was of course
allowed ; so much and no more. And St. Benedict,
in his fatherly thoughtfulness, orders that two dishes
should be prepared, so that the monks may have a
choice of dish and every one be satisfied. At dinner
Dom John drank cider or ale, which was sometimes
a very poor creature, should the home have a pro-
curator or cellarer too careful, not to say stingy, with
his malt. This would sometimes happen. Or he
might have wine, especially on feast days ; for some
of the monasteries cultivated the grape, and had
vineyards of their own, either here or in more
favoured France.2
If he had meat it would be three or four days in
1 Quoted from a Reg. Eccl. Cant, by Battely in his continuation of
The Antiquities of Canterbury (Somner), Part II. p. 96.
2 Christ Church, Canterbury, had vineyards at Triel and St. Brice.
See Literal Cantuarienses (Roll Series), vol. i. p. 211.
THE MONK IN HIS MONASTERY 81
the week, and never during Advent or Lent. In
his turn, he took his share of waiting on his breth-
ren or of reading to them during the meal from
the high pulpit in the refectory. He would read
to them from Holy Writ or from some other book
comfortable to their souls. Dinner over, he went
in procession, for such was the custom in some
houses, with the rest of the monks to the cloister-
garth where the dead were buried. There all bare-
headed the brethren stood " a certain long space,
praying among the tombs and ' throwghes ' for their
brethren's souls, being buried there. And when
they had done their prayers they returned to the
cloister and there did study their book." 1
The cloister was the scene of their daily work, and
where all the life of the monastery was carried on.
It was generally situated on the southern side of the
church, thus getting what sunshine might be. The
western side of the cloister was the part which Dom
John at first frequented, for there was held the school
for the younger monks. Sitting at desks one behind
the other, they studied the trivium (grammar, rhetoric,
and dialectics) and quadrivium (music, arithmetic,
geometry, and astronomy), under which all knowledge
was then summed. " Their master had a pretty seat
of wainscot adjoining . . . over against the stall
where they sat." 2 Let us hope that sometimes, when
youthful spirits found vent in tricks upon one another,
the discreet master was not always looking.
1 Durham Rites, p. 74. 2 Ibid. p. 70.
VOL. I. F
S2 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
The northern side of the cloister was reserved for
the elder brethren, where they pursued their studies,
commonly in little oaken carrels, three to each
window — each one separate, and containing " a desk
to lie their books on." These little studies were
handsomely wainscoted, " all but the fore part, which
had carved work which gave light in at their carrell
door . . . and over against the carrels against the
church wall did stand certain great cupboards of
wainscot all full of books, with a great store of ancient
manuscripts to help them in their study, wherein did
lie as well the old ancient written Doctors of the
Church, as other profane authors, with divers other
holy men's works, so that every one did study what
doctor pleased them the best, having the library at
all times to go study in besides their carrels." *
On the south side, or near the chapter-house, sat
the abbat and the elders ; and there the business
was done, and there also would Dom John go on
Sundays after prime to be shriven. The windows
in the cloister were glazed ; and in the winter-time
straw or hay was spread on the ground for warmth's
sake. In one side of the cloister, often the south,
and close to the refectory door was the lavatory,2
1 Durham Rites, pp. 70, 71.
2 " Within the cloister-garth, over against the Frater house door, was
a fair Laver or Conduit for the monks to wash their hands and faces at,
being made in form round, covered with lead, and all of marble saving
the very outer walls (and with) many little conduits or spouts of brass
with xxiiii Cocks of brass . . . having the closets or almeries . . .
kept always with sweet and clean towels, as is aforesaid, to dry their
hands " (Durham Rites, p. 70).
THE MONK IN HIS MONASTERY 83
where the monks would wash their hands before
dinner; for cleanliness is a virtue as well as a
necessity in a monastery.
A cloister in the days of Dom John would be a
very different sight from what they are nowadays.
Then they were the workshops of the monastery.
But a strange workshop it was, in truth ; for the
workmen were all silent, and no busy hum of worldly
work was heard. Eecollection reigned over all the
place ; no hurry, no bustle. These men worked for
eternity, not for time ; and knew that God rewards
not the amount done but the love with which it is
wrought. This is the secret of the success of the
work and the spirituality of the art of the old days.
This also explains the reason why modern work,
done in all the turmoil of life, so often fails in
grasping the spirit of repose and strength which
characterise the work of olden days. Here, then,
while some would be busy in study, others would be
writing, others illuminating, others designing, others
embroidering. Others, again, would be engaged in
the details of administration, unless they had sepa-
rate offices, as was often the case. Place for all
pursuits was found ; and the debt the world owes
to those patient silent workmen of the cloister
cannot be measured. On Saturdays it was the
scene, too, of the weekly washing of feet.1 Then,
1 At stated intervals, the mysteries of the bath were practised and
changes of clothes given out. A dirty monk would be a nuisance to
all around him, and this was guarded against by the ordinary routine.
84 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
too, at stated intervals of a week or so, and always
before the greater feasts, would the brethren shave
one another — a difficult task ; for not only the face
but the whole head, save a ring or crown of hair,
was shaven. But so clumsy wTere some of the
operators that, as at St. Augustine's, Canterbury
(1252), laymen were often deputed to shave the
brethren. Here also, four or six times a year, was
the solemn practice of the minutio gone through.
This, in other words, was that panacea for all bodily
ills, blood-letting. Those who had been bled had
for three days extra food and rest to recover them-
selves. Here also, round the cloister, were made
the procession on Sundays and feasts, during
which the priest sprinkled with hallowed water the
various places.
In this cloister, then, would Dom John after dinner
remain at work, or perhaps even napping, until tivo,
when nones were sung in the church, after which
work again till vesper-time, which was at six. But
an hour before vespers the house had been shut up,
and no more strangers were admitted. Vespers, the
sacrifice of the evening incense, were sung with
great solemnity. It was followed, if it were not a
fasting day, by a small collation, so called originally
from the spiritual reading, generally from Cassian's
Collationes or Conferences, which were read during
the repast. A manchet of bread with a drink of
beer or such like was all. Eising from the collation,
they went straight into the church for compline,
THE MONK IN HIS MONASTERY 85
which being over, left them free to be in bed
before 8 p.m.1
As they had spent the day together, so the night
found them in one common dorter, or sleeping-
house. This was either one large open-room with
uncurtained beds, as more than one constitution
ordered, or the room was divided off into cells.
" Every monk having a little chamber of wainscott,
very close, several, by themselves and their win-
dows towards the cloister . . . the partition
between every chamber was close wainscoted one
from the other, and in every of their windows
a desk to support their books for their study." 2
As a rule the dorter was kept most strictly for
sleeping purposes, although at Durham it seems
to have been allowed to be used for study as
well. Perhaps at the time of the afternoon
sleep, often the custom, those who did not want
to sleep read. The furniture of the cells was
simple. The monks of Christ Church, Canter-
bury, for instance, had a mat and a hard pillow
to lie down upon, and a blanket or rug to keep
them warm. They slept in their clothes.3 At St.
Albans the bedsteads were of oak, says Matthew
of Paris. Strict silence was always kept in the
1 We have taken the horarium mainly from Westminster.
2 Durham Rites, p. 72.
3 Beg. Eccl. Cant, quoted by Battely, ut supra. It will be remem-
bered, from the list given in the " Book of Ely" and elsewhere, that the
monks had special garments for night wear which correspond to the
modern idea.
86 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
dorter; and a light, according to St. Benedict's
Rule,1 burnt the whole night.
This was a long and a hard day for Dom John
and his fellow-monks. Eight hours were given to
choir work, for besides the day's office, there would
be also the office of the dead and that of Our Lady
to be said as well. Eight hours were given to the
body for food, sleep, and recreation ; and the other
eight to study, or to the administration of such
offices as were committed to their charge. We have
said nothing, however, about recreation. The bow
cannot be kept over-bent, or the result would be to
make a very dull monk of Dom John.
There were times and places of recreation duly
fixed. There was the "frayter," or common house,
where the monks could meet at lawful hours for
conversation. It was generally in the afternoons
they met here ; and merry and bright would it be ;
for in that monastery was one Dom Edward, a
merry wight, full of jokes and stories mirthful.
At times of recreation he would amuse the brethren
with some droll conceit or merry quip ; a certain
little gesture of his lent a point to his story, and a
twinkle of his eye betrayed the coming jest. But
withal, be it remembered, he was a grave doctor,
learned in divinity and much looked up to ; for had
he not been to Rome itself, on business connected
with the abbey, and seen its wonders, and had many
tales to tell of the monasteries he had visited and
1 Ch. XXII.
THE MONK IN HIS MONASTERY 87
edified ? In the " frayter " was also a fire in winter-
time, to which the monks could come to warm them-
selves. The room was hence often called the
" Calefactory." Hard by, at Durham for instance,
was a garden for pleasaunce, and a bowling alley at
the back of the house for the recreation of the
younger men when it pleased their master to give
them leave.1 Besides, there would be the whole of
the enclosure to take exercise in. These enclosures
were sometimes very large. That at Glaston, for
instance, was sixty acres in extent. But outside of
this the monks were never allowed to go without
leave. This was a very strict rule, and its infringe-
ment subjected them to severe penalties.
But Dom John was not kept a close prisoner.
He could get leave to go out. He would go away
at intervals to one of the granges or cells which
Lynminster had in various parts of the country.
What the sort of life was, during these visits, may
perhaps be gathered from a letter of the prior
of Durham to the prior of the cell at Finchal,
written in 1408. As the cathedral-monastery was
1 Durham Rites, p. 75. There were periods of recreation at the times
of the great feasts of the year. Visits of great men, or any extraordinary
function in the church would also break the routine of the cloister life.
There would be little feasts occasionally, with something extra in the
way of cakes, &c. For instance at Durham, in the common house, " the
master of it kept his 0 Sapientia once a year, viz. between Martinmas and
Christmas, a solemn banquet that the prior and convent did use at that
time of the year only, when their banquet was of figs and raisins, ale
and cakes, and thereof no superfluity or excess, but a scholastical and
moderate congratulation among themselves." — Durham Rites, p. 75.
88 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
then in difficulties, the recreations which the monks
used to have were for a time suspended, and instead
the brethren were sent to Finchal, there to have a
little relaxation. And in view of this the cathedral
prior makes some regulations. Four monks, for
three weeks at a time, will be sent from Durham to
Finchal to join the little community, then consist-
ing of a prior and four religious. Two of the
visitors have to be present daily at matins, mass, and
vespers, and at all other choir duties ; the other two
are to be free to go about in the country religiose
et honeste, but are bound to attend the mass and
vespers unless for some reasonable cause the prior
of the house grants a dispensation. This liberty
next day is to be given to the other two. While
all are to use the common dorter, the prior is
to provide a room properly furnished with a fire
and all things necessary for the visitors, and a
special servant is to be appointed to wait on them.1
But such excursions would be at present rare in
the case of Dom John ; for he had to be broken in
to the willing monotony of monastic life. But the
time was coming when he must leave his abbey for
a while and go up to the university to take his
degree,2 and come back learned in the law, or
perhaps a master in theology.
1 The Priory of Finchal (Surtees Society, pp. 30, 31). See also the
rules for the country house at Redburne belonging to St. Albans.
Gesta Abbatum (Roll Series), vol. ii. pp. 202, 205.
2 Sometimes the youths attached to a claustral school went up to
Oxford to the benedictine houses and studied there and took their
THE MONK IN HIS MONASTERY 89
In 1283 John Gifford, Lord of Brimsfield, during
the abbacy of Eeginald de Hamone, founded for
thirteen monks of St. Peter's, Gloucester, a house at
Oxford for students at the university. The church
of Chipping Norton was appropriated for their
support. The abbat, not able to carry on the house
satisfactorily by his unaided efforts, got other houses
to join with him. In 1290 the general chapter
took up the matter of the higher education of their
monks. They were pretty well forced to take some
action, because the friars * already at the univer-
sities * were carrying everything before them by the
brilliancy of their studies and the hosts of students
they attracted. The general chapter ordered that
one monk in every twenty out of each house should
be sent to the university, to the house known from
its first owners as Gloucester Hall, and there go
through his university course.2 Each house had to
support its own men, making them a fixed allowance
for necessities besides contributing their share of the
common tax. By degrees each of the principal
degrees in arts before becoming monks. Sometimes they returned to
the university after they had been for some time in the monastery.
We shall see later on (Ch. IX.) an example of this. See, also, an
interesting account of the Canterbury claustral school, in Dom Gasquet's
The Old English Bible arid other Essays, p. 260.
1 The dominicans made their first English house at Oxford 1221,
and the franciscans settled there about the same time.
2 The sister university of Cambridge also had its home of studies,
the rebuilding of which was stopped through the attainder of the duke
of Buckingham, its munificent benefactor, in the reign of Henry VIII.
About three fourths of the benedictine students went to Oxford, and
only one fourth to Cambridge.
9o THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
houses who used this hall besides the original
owners, St. Albans, Glaston, Tavistock, Burton,
Chertsey, Coventry, Evesham, Eynsham, St. Ed-
mundsbury, Winchcombe, Malmesbury, Norwich,
Rochester, and others, built separate sets of cham-
bers, existing to this day, for their own students,
and marked with the heraldic device of their own
monastery.1
To this house, then, was Dora John Weston sent
from Lynminster. His mode of life was somewhat
modified at the university, for he had to get in as
much time for study as he could. But it was still a
hard life, and contrasted greatly with the free and
easy tone always found in university towns. He
was kept strictly from intercourse with seculars, who
might waste his time, and on no account was he
allowed to study with them. He got up between 4
and 5 o'clock each morning ; from 5 to 6 was spent
in prayer; from 6 to 10 study and lectures, and
then he broke his fast. Shortly after dinner he
resumed his study until 5 p.m., when he supped
much in the same way he had dined. Then study
again until 9, when he went to bed.2 Out of the
1 The bishop of Durham founded a house in 1337 at Oxford, for
thirteen students from his cathedral-monastery, as a memorial of the
king's victory over the Scots at Halidon. From a letter of the prior,
we learn that in this home the divine office had to be said daily in
choir by all vel ad minus duo. On Sundays and all double feasts all
were obliged to attend at the hours, which, although not sung, were to
be said tractim. They sang both mass and vespers on these days, and on
the principal feasts the whole office and the mass si tempus hoc permiserit.
2 Fosbroke's British Mo?iasticism, p. 186.
THE MONK IN HIS MONASTERY 91
time allotted for study he had to find the time for
his office and the necessary recreation. After some
years of this severe life, Dom John returned to
Lynminster with the coveted degree of Doctor of
Theology, which meant much in those days, and
gave the holder a certain position in the community
as well as in the outer world.
He had now to look forward to the priesthood.
Already had he received the clerical tonsure and
the minor orders from his abbat ; but for the
sacred orders he had to go to the bishop of the
diocese. Lynminster, not being exempt from episco-
pal control, could not call in any bishop at pleasure
for ordinations, blessings, and consecration. Most
likely Dom John had to go to the cathedral city
for the general ordination, and there receive his
priesthood together with the rest of the clergy.
But wherever it was, it was a great day for him ;
and his first mass was the occasion of much re-
joicing at Lynminster. Lie had to provide a feast
for his brethren, such was the custom, and wrote to
his friends and relatives to help him on the occa-
sion.1 Owing to his university training, or rather
to the good use he had made of his time there, he
was a man likely to rise in his house and to hold
high office — all of which came about in course of
time.
But meanwhile he had to take up the work of
teaching the novices ; for his old teacher was past
1 D. Gasquet's The Old English Bible and other Essays, p. 283.
92 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
his work, and his abbat was anxious to keep the
intellectual tone of the monks up to the level of
the best house in England. For the abbat who
then presided over Lynminster knew well that a
house, to be prosperous and vigorous, must have
a high standard of intellectual life ; otherwise its
men become children, unable to think for them-
selves, or cope with any emergency, and, as a
result of such a system, would by-and-by, like list-
less drones, live without any interests in life. This
unhealthy tone the abbat was determined not to
allow while he held rule. For in his younger days
he had seen the ill effects of a contrary policy ; and
now that he was called to the abbat' s chair, he was
determined to do his best to remedy them. In the
days of his predecessor (good but too easy-going
man), studies had been neglected, a lax tone had
crept in, and everything had gone down. Visi-
tations, both diocesan and monastic, could keep
things in check indeed, but could not get at the
root of the evil. With the new abbat it took
some time and the help of able obedientiaries to
restore things to a proper efficiency.
In this abbey the chief office-holders were : the
Precentor, whose duty it was to arrange all details
of the services in the church : he also had the charge
of the library, and had to provide parchment, colours,
paper, ink, and other material for the monks. Then
came the Sacrist, who had care of the church and
its furniture : he was charged with the provision of
THE MONK IN HIS MONASTERY 93
vestments, lights, and wine, &c. Then there was
the Almoner, who had to see to the distributions
of alms to the poor ; the Refectory Master and
the Pitance Master,1 important officials who were
responsible for the meals and supplies of all kinds.
Then there was the Chamberlain, who had charge
of the dormitory and of the monks' clothes ; the
Infirmarian, Guestmaster, Treasurer, whose names
denote their offices. The Cellarer, however, ruled
supreme in the department of domestic concerns,
and was looked upon as the second father in the
monastery.2 He held the most important place, for
he was the business manager of the abbey ; and
.upon him depended in a great measure whether
life ran on as smoothly as it should.
The abbat was a wise man. Although he had
the whole control over his abbey, yet he gave full
scope to all his officers, and did not keep every
detail in his own hands. He wanted his monks to
be men, not children. As long as they kept within
certain limits he left them free, and did not interfere
or scold at every mistake. For it was by their very
mistakes he wished them to learn how to rule and
administer. If a monk turned out an irremedial
failure in his office, he was removed and another
substituted. The result of the abbat's wise policy
1 An interesting manuscript [Harl. 1005] of about the latter half of
the fourteenth century gives a full and detailed account of the nature
and occasions of the pitances, or " scholastical and moderate congratu-
lations," at St. Edmundsbury.
2 E.g. at Peterborough.
94 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
was that Lynminster became a strong house in every
way. Among its monks were to be found master-
men and good solid religious, capable of fulfilling
with credit any work set upon them. The good
the abbat did, died not with him. There had been
such a quiet, steady development of energy that
the results were lasting ; and Lynminster, when
the day of trial came, was found one of " the solemn
monasteries in which religion was, thank God !
right well observed."
Under such an abbat, Dom John Weston was
sure to get on ; and in due course rose to the highest
office. He went through various grades of adminis-
tration, and then was set to rule his brethren as prior.
He it was who carried out in detail the abbat' s
principles, and under him Lynminster was a happy
and united brotherhood.
But alas ! he was sent off to London on important
business for the abbat and there caught the plague,
which was making one of its periodical visits. When
he was first seized, he was staying at a house be-
longing to his monastery which the abbat kept up
for the use of his monks.1 He did not die from the
malady, but his health utterly broke down. He
lingered on through the long summer days. His
one desire was to get back home, to be with his
brethren. Taking advantage of a fallacious rally,
he was brought by slow degrees back to Lynminster
1 The abbat of St. Albans kept up such a house. See Gesta Abbatum
(Roll Series), vol. i. p. 289.
THE MONK IN HIS MONASTERY 95
and put in the infirmary, a large building with its
own chapel, on the north-east side of the church.
There he was tended with loving hands. Three
times was he solemnly visited by all the community,
who came to pray by him. The abbat received his
public profession of faith. Then was he houseled
and annealed, and thus strengthened, could look
with confidence to his coming passage into eternity.
And when in a few days the end came, the
bells rang, and the monks came into the chamber
of death with the crucifix, and sweet singing of the
Credo, and psalms and litanies.2 They found prior
John Weston clad in his cowl and, in penitential
spirit, laid on sackcloth and ashes. And as they
watched and prayed his life gently ebbed away.
At last the conversion of his life, promised at pro-
fession, was complete ; he had been obedient until
death, and his stability had been confirmed for ever.
With sorrow his brethren paid the last offices. The
body, wrapped in a shroud but uncoffined, was
carried on a bier to the church. And Placebo and
Dirige were chanted, and the abbat himself sang
Requiem; and the monks said there were tears in
his voice. Then was the body of prior John Weston
borne forth, and was laid in the garth that was
in the midst of the cloisters.
For thirty days his obsequies were celebrated with
office and mass and daily visit to his grave. And
1 Officium Ecclesiasticum Abbatum sec. usum., Eveshamien. Monas.
(Henry Bradshaw Society), p. 117.
96 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
the prayers of the poor were also invoked for his
soul. In the refectory during all that time a black
cross was set in his place at table ; and his portion
of food and drink was bestowed on the poor. His
name was written in the obit-book to be read out,
year by year, as the date of his death came round.
And word was sent round to all the monasteries in
England to which Lynminster was united in spiritual
relationship to beg for prayers for his soul. And
each house did its share of prayers for the assoiling
of his soul. His memory was kept green for a long
time in his old home. For no love here below is so
lasting and faithful as that between those who have
given up all earthly loves and found them again in
the Lord.
CHAPTER VI
WOMEN UNDER THE RULE
Whether St. Scholastica was a nun or not is uncer-
tain, although St. Gregory tells us she was dedicated
to God from her earliest childhood.1 There are no
historical traces remaining for us to decide the
question ; though venerable tradition records that
St. Benedict founded also a community of virgins
consecrated to God, and placed his sister at their
head. While there is not a word in his Rule 2 about
such a community, and St. Gregory in his dialogues
is also silent, still, on the other hand, there is
nothing in the teaching of the great lawgiver which
cannot be applied to women. We know also that
he seems to have undertaken the spiritual direction
of his sister and had conferences with her, one of
which was so beautifully illustrated by God granting
a prayer the brother had refused.3
But whether St. Scholastica was a nun or not,
one thing is certain, that before her brother's time
there were cloisters of women dedicated to God.
1 Dialogues of St. Gregory, book ii. chap, xxxiii.
2 The word " woman " does not even occur in the Rule.
3 Ibid.
VOL. I. 97 G
98 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
They flourished in the East, whence St. Benedict drew
much of his law. Cassian, at least, had introduced
them into the West, and had founded a convent at
Marseilles, whence Cesarius, bishop of Aries (542),
persuaded his sister, Cesaria, to come and join him
and preside over a convent he was then founding.
Tradition ascribes to St. Martin the foundation
of various communities for women ; x and in St.
Gregory's time we know, from an account of the
procession instituted on account of the plague then
devastating Rome, that there were abbesses and
nuns ; for they were appointed to walk in the pro-
cession along with the priests of the first region.2
If St. Benedict founded a religious community for
women it was nothing unheard of ; but whether he did
so or not, we may be sure it would only be a short
time before he, too, was looked upon as guide and
father to the many convents already existing. How-
ever this may be, here in England we have no doubt
but that, as in the North, columban nuns existed at
any rate very soon after the introduction of Chris-
tianity : so in the South, where the Roman bene-
dictine influence was the stronger, it is almost as
certain that the numerous convents, that sprang up
as it were by magic, were benedictine. But, as we
have elsewhere remarked, there was no antagonism
between the two Rules ; and the process of assimila-
tion, or perhaps absorption, of the Celtic Rule by that
1 Dupuy, A., Histoire de S. Martin, p. 176.
3 Mabillon, Annates Ordinis S. Benedicti (ed. Paris, 1 703), torn. i. p. 2 1 7.
WOMEN UNDER THE RULE 99
of St. Benedict was so gradual as almost to be im-
perceptible. The Oriental tinge of severity so per-
ceptible in the former would have to give way to the
wTider spirit of the West, which dealt with men as it
found them. The two Rules were typical of their
origins — that of the East unchanging and stereo-
typed ; that of the West keeping in touch with the
times, ever adapting itself to the unceasing flow and
development of humanity.
Hilda in the north at Whitby, and Eanswith in the
south at Folkestone, are the two prominent found-
resses of the religious life for women in our land.
Little is known of either of them ; especially as to the
beginning of their religious lives. Hilda was one of
EdwTin of Northumbrian household, and in her four-
teenth year was baptized at York, on that Easter-day
(627) that saw Paulinus, the benedictine monk, re-
ceiving the king and court into the Church of Christ.
"Nothing is known of the life of Hild (Hilda)
between the ages of fourteen and thirty-four; but
evidently she had not dwelt in obscure retirement,
for the Scottish prelate Aidan in 647, knowing that
she was living in the Midlands, begged her to return
to the north. It is a noteworthy circumstance if,
in an age when marriage was the rule, she remained
single without taking the veil, but she may have
been associated with some religious settlement." 1
1 Eckenstein, Women under Monasticism, p. 82. But Bede says "she
withdrew to the province of the East Angles," with the intention of
going to Chelles (lib. iv. cap. xxiii.).
ioo THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
She became foundress of Whitby, at first a columban
monastery for men and women. It afterwards re-
ceived the benedictine Rule as well, perhaps through
the influence of Wilfrid. Of Eanswith we know still
less. Her father, Edbald of Kent, after he had put
away his heathen wife, married a princess of the
Franks. About the year 630 he gave his daughter a
piece of land at Folkestone, where she founded a
convent. It would be a curious point for speculation
to discover whether this beginning in Kent was
due to the influence of the Northumbrian Edwins
widow, Ethelburga, who with her children and
Paulinus had taken refuge at her brother's Kentish
court, or whether the Frankish princess had taken
the initiative. But there was Paulinus the bene-
dictine at hand to give a direction to the new settle-
ment. However, her convent was destroyed or
deserted at the close of the century ; for there is a
charter of Athelstane (927) giving the land to Christ
Church, Canterbury, " the house having been de-
stroyed by the pagans." 1
Queen Ethelburga was herself the foundress of a
house at Liming. It would naturally be, coming from
the north, that her foundation should be modelled
on the great abbey of Whitby. But that is no proof
that the house was governed by the columban Rule
pure and simple. Sexburgh, queen of Erconbert,
the successor of Edbald, founded another convent
at Sheppy. At this time, says Bede, "there were
1 Dugdale, vol. i. p. 451.
WOMEN UNDER THE RULE 101
not yet many monasteries built in the regions of
the Angles. Many were wont, for the sake of the
monastic mode of life, to go from Britain to the
monasteries of the Franks and of Gaul; they
also sent their daughters to the same to be in-
structed and to be wedded to the Heavenly Spouse
chiefly in the monasteries of Brie, Chelles, and
Andelys."1
Mildred was the foundress of the famous abbey of
Minster in Thanet. She had been brought up at
Chelles, where, says the legend, the abbess Wilcoma
wanted the girl to marry one of her kinsmen.
Irritated by her refusals, she ordered her to be cast
into a roaring fire whence she came forth untouched.
She escaped back to England. Some time towards
the latter half of the seventh century we find
Egberht, king of Kent, giving her land in Thanet as
a blood-fine for the murder of two of her brothers.
" She asked for as much land as her tame deer
could run over in one course, and received over ten
thousand acres of the best land in Kent." 2 On this
land she built a monastery ; and her name as abbess
appears signing a charter of privileges granted by
King Witred to the churches and monasteries
of Kent. Her name comes the first of the five
abbesses who sign the document after the arch-
bishop of Canterbury and the bishop of Rochester.
A noticeable fact, the names of these five women
1 Hist Eccles., book iii. chap. viii.
2 Dugdale, vol. i. p. 447.
102 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
come before that of the priests who attested the
charter.1
Of the other nunneries famous in Saxon days was
Ely, founded (6J2>) hy Audrey or Etheldreda, the
friend of Wilfrid. This seems to have been a double
convent, or at least to have had a convent of monks
hard by. One of her successors was Werburg, to
whom was entrusted, by her uncle King Ethelred,
the oversight of all the nunneries in his domains.
She is known to have founded houses at Trentham,
and at Hanbury, and at Weden.2
Coldingham was founded by Ebba, also a friend
of Wilfrid's, and of Cuthbert too, that holy bishop
of Lindisfarne who did so much by his gentleness
and sweetness to introduce Roman usages among
the columban monks in England. "Ebba wrote
begging him to come and condescend to edify
both herself and the inmates of her monastery
by the grace of his exhortations. Cuthbert accord-
ingly went thither, and tarrying for some days
he expounded the ways of justice to all ; these
he not only preached, but to the same extent
practised." 3
Osith of Aylesbury, Frideswith of Oxford, Osburg
of Coventry, Modwen of Burton, Everild of Evering-
ham, are names which, as foundresses and abbesses
1 Haddan and Stubbs, Councils and Ecclesiastical Documents, vol. iii.
p. 240.
2 During the Danish invasion her relics, which were at Hanbury,
in 875 were carried off to Chester, whose patron she became.
3 Bede, Life of St. Cuthbert, chap. x.
WOMEN UNDER THE RULE 103
of holy houses, were sweet in the ears of our Saxon
forefathers.
But among them all stands out pre-eminent Ethel-
burga, sister of Erkonwald (693), bishop of London,
who made a home for his sister at Barking, which
"he established excellently in the regular disci-
pline." * This renowned house was also a famous
place for the education of high-born children. The
great scholar Aldhelm 2 wrote his treatise on Virginity
for the nuns of this convent ; and the whole tone of
the book, besides several direct passages, shows that
the intellectual life there must have been of a very
high order. He quotes freely from the Fathers, and
refers to the classics of antiquity. He praises
especially the nuns for being devoted to study : like
bees they gather, he says, everywhere material for
study. Scripture, history, grammar, poetry, are
among some of the subjects which he mentions.
But evidently he looks upon Barking as an oasis
in the worldliness which even then (the beginning
of the eighth century) had entered into nunneries.
He describes nuns elsewhere as wearing " a vest
of fine linen of a violet colour. Above it a scarlet
tunic with a hood, sleeves striped with silk and
trimmed with red fur ; the locks on the forehead
1 Bede, lib. iv. cap. vi. Miss Eckenstein states that Barking was
a double monastery. We can find no proof of this anywhere. Bede
says : " In which (Barking) she could live as the mother and nourish er
of devout women" (ibid.).
2 Aldhelm was abbat of Malmsbury, and became bishop of Sher-
borne.
104 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
and the temples are curled with a crisping-iron ;
their dark head-veil is given up for white and
coloured head-dresses, which, with bows of ribbon
sewn on, reach to the ground ; their nails, like those
of a falcon or sparrow-hawk, are found to resemble
talons." 1 This last reminds us that Aldhelm was
a poet ; and this may have been one of his licenses.
Wimborne, the last of the foundations of the early
Saxon period, was founded from Barking by Cuthburg
(725), a sister of Ina, king of Wessex, and wife of
Ealdfrid of Northumbria. A famous inmate of this
house was Lioba, one of the friends of Winfrid
better known as St. Boniface. He wrote to the
abbess Tetta begging her, " as a comfort in his
wanderings and as a help in his mission, to send the
virgin Lioba, the fame of whose holiness and teaching
of godly life had penetrated across wide lands and
filled the mouths of many with her praise." * She
went, and became abbess of the famous house of
Bischofsheim near Mainz.
In her life, written by Kudolf of Fulda (850), we
get a glimpse of the life in these double monasteries.
" There were two settlements at Wimborne, formerly
erected by the kings of that people, surrounded by
lofty and strong walls, and endowed with ample
revenues. Of these, one was for clerics, the other for
women. But neither, for such was the rule of their
foundation, was ever entered by any members of
1 S. Aldhelmi: De Laudibus Virginitates (ed. Migne), vol. 89, p. 157.
2 Vita S. Lioba, Pars II. Acta Sanctorum (Sept. 28), p. 713.
WOMEN UNDER THE RULE 105
the other sex. No women had permission to come
among the congregation of men, no men to enter
into the dwellings of the virgins, the priests alone
excepted, who entered their church to celebrate mass,
and withdrew to their own part at once as soon as
the service prayer was solemnly finished. . . . More-
over, the mother herself of the congregation, when-
ever it was necessary that she should give orders in
the affairs of the monastery, spoke through a window,
and decided whatever was considered to be best." *
Most of the nunneries perished during the invasion
of the Danes, and but few were rebuilt. Only those
which were in connection with the royal house of
Wessex remained at the close of the tenth century.
Those of the Northern and Midland districts had
entirely disappeared. Some were deserted ; others
had been laid waste during the Danish invasion. It
has been observed that with the return of tranquillity,
not one of the houses for women was restored.
Seculars " took possession of them, and when they
were expelled, the Church claimed the land, or the
settlement was restored to the use of monks. Some
of the great houses formerly ruled by women were
thus appropriated to men. Whitby and Ely rose in
renewed splendour under the rule of abbats. Repton,
Wimborne, and numerous other nunneries became
the property of monks." 2
The chief convents which survived to the Conquest
1 Ibid., Pars I. p. 711.
2 Eckenstein, Women under Monasticism, pp. 201, 202.
106 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
were Shaftesbury (founded in 893 by Alfred the
Great for his daughter Ethelgiva), Amesbury, Romsey,
Winchester, Wilton, and Barking. Like all founded
before the Conquest, these houses were abbeys,1 and
their abbesses were women of great political power
in the kingdom. Those of Shaftesbury, Wilton,
Winchester (Nunna - minster) and Barking held
their lands of the king by an entire barony, and
had the privilege, at a later date, of being summoned
to Parliament, though this lapsed on account of
their sex.2
The abbess had most of the privileges of the
abbats, and in her possession were many lands,
together with their churches, from which she drew
her revenues, and to which she exercised the rights
of presentation. She had to do service to the Crown
and supply her quota of knights for the king's
1 The houses founded after the Conquest were generally priories.
Of the sixty-four benedictine convents founded for women after Saxon
days, only three, viz. Godstow, Mailing, and Elstow, were abbeys. " The
explanation is to be sought in the system of feudal tenure. Women no
longer held property, nunneries were founded and endowed by local
barons or abbats. When power from the preceding period devolved on
the woman in authority, she retained it ; but when new appointments
were made, the current tendency was in favour of curtailing her power."
Cf. Women under Monasticism, p. 204. When the house was founded by
an abbat it remained under his jurisdiction, and the house was visited
both by abbat and by bishop, unless the abbey itself was exempt ; then
all houses depending upon it shared in the privilege, e.g. Sopwell
nunnery in relation to St. Albans, and Kilburn to Westminster.
Although the Lateran constitution gave general chapters the visitation
of nunneries, yet we do not find any traces of capitular visitors going
to any nunnery. Their oversight was left to the bishops.
2 Dugdale, vol. ii. p. 472.
WOMEN UNDER THE RULE 107
service.1 She held her own courts for pleas of
debts, and was altogether a most important per-
sonage. Of course she was elected for life, but
could be deposed.
We will look a little more closely at the life of
nuns, or " mynchyns," as they were called in the
Southern parts of England, and make use of such
information as we can glean from historical remains.
One feature of the life which strikes the reader
at once is the fact that the benedictine nun in
England, like her sister abroad, was not bound by
the same law of enclosure as the nun of the last
three hundred years. Her cloister was her home
indeed ; and there she loved to dwell in peace and
retirement. But she did not hesitate to go out
when the service of God required it. The pages
of history are so full of examples, that one is sur-
prised to find that any can doubt that the original
benedictine nun had practically as much freedom
as the monk. From the days of St. Scholastica
herself, who came out to visit her brother, all during
the Saxon times, and up to the Reformation, English
benedictine nuns had a mitigated form of enclosure.
And not the English " mynchyns " only, but in
Germany, where the great names of Hildegarde,
1 The abbess of Shaftesbury, Agnes Ferrar, in 12 51 was summoned
to Chester to take part in the military proceedings against Llewellin ;
and a successor of hers, Juliana Bauceyn, twenty years after, had a
similar call made upon her. The abbesses of Shaftesbury, as baronesses,
had to supply the king's service with a certain number of knights to-
gether with their full complement of soldiers. Cf. Dugdale, vol. ii. p. 473.
108 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
Gertrude, and the two Mechtildas were those of nuns
as much unenclosed as their English sisters who
went to help Winfrid and Willibald and Winibald
in evangelising and civilising the German heathen.1
The majestic vision of Hilda taking part in synods,
of Werburg inspecting the convents in her uncle's
kingdom, of Withburga following the pilgrim-track
to Rome, of Frideswide working a miracle on the
public road at Oxford, of Edith at the court of her
father Edgar ; all come up at once to our memory as
names of unenclosed nuns doing God's work in the
world, and keeping themselves unspotted therefrom.
Later on we find many a reference to nuns being
out of their convents. For instance, in the four-
teenth century bishop Stapleton was on visitation
in his diocese of Exeter, and among other decrees
made for the benedictine nunnery of Polslo, was
that they were not to be allowed to go out and
visit their friends more than once in the year.
They had to get the prioress' leave ; and she was
charged with providing a professed nun as a com-
panion, who had to be changed each year.2
1 It is a fact worth moralising upon, that no canonised saint has
been found among the benedictine nuns since they kept strict enclosure.
Other orders, in which enclosure is of the essence of their vocation, have
had them in abundance.
2 Hingeston-Randolph. The Register of Walter de Stajiledon ( 1 307-26),
p. 317. We give here a license for a nun to go out for a while from
her convent. P. C. Priorissse E. Precibus charissimae nobis in Christo
filise Dominae . . . consanguinis Domini . . . militis nostri dicecesis
favorabilibus inclinatus, ut ad earn justis et honestis ex causis Domina
. . . hujus dicti vestri prioratus commonialis, cum alia ejusdem prior-
WOMEN UNDER THE RULE 109
Sometimes law business took the prioress away.
"When I rode to London for the suit that was
taken," says the prioress of Pree in her account for
1487-89, and notes down the money (20 shillings)
paid for herself and " my priest and a woman
and two men." l The abbess of Shaftesbury, Joan
Formage, had leave from her bishop in 1368 to
go to one of her manors to take the air and divert
herself.2 Nuns, however, did not always like this
sort of thing ; and when visitation time came round
they would complain to the bishop that my lady
abbess was always riding off somewhere or other ;
and they were quite sure it was not always on
business.3
But they themselves could go out at times.4
Their customs allowed them to go abroad, if they
were ill, to take the waters, to console sick parents,
to attend their funerals. They could be absent for
three days only when out for relaxation or illness,
but a special dispensation was needed for any
further extension of absence.5
atus ipsam associente accedere valeant ; valeant equestri, non obstan-
tibus vestris consuetudinibus contrariis, dispensatione, ex causis licitis
nobis sufficienter doctis, in quantum de jure possumus, quatenus
obedientiam et honestatem discipline regularis literarum tenore
praesentium duximus indulgendam, &c. &c. (MSS. Harl. 2179, f. ?8).
1 Dugdale, vol. iii. p. 360.
2 Hutchins, J., The History and Antiquities of the County of Dorset,
vol. ii. p. 17.
3 Ibid. p. 474.
4 Blaauw, W. H., Episcopal Visitations of the Benedictine Nunnery
of Easebourne (Sussex Archaeological Collections), vol. iv. p. 7.
5 Lyndewood, Provinciate, p. 212.
no THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
Chaucer was too ftrue an artist to include, in
the gay company meeting at Southwark that April
morning all bound for Canterbury, two nuns, a
prioress and her companion, if such characters
would have been out of place in a band of
pilgrims. His description of " Madame Eglentine "
the prioress is full of charming touches, and shows
us a lady, well-bred and friendly, in a dignified
way, with all her company. She did not ride on
demurely and silently. In the general entertain-
ment she tells her tale of the little boy-martyr,
a legend such as she would read at home in her
convent. And her companion was not behind-
hand either, but contributes a prettily told story
of St. Cecily.
How did the nuns occupy themselves in their
convents ? Study and intellectual pursuits have
always been favourite employments with benedic-
tine dames, and one may almost gauge the state
of observance in a convent by the standard of
intellectual activity which there obtained. When
that was high, the convent flourished both in
number and in exactness of rule. Where learning
was neglected, almost everything else showed signs
of decay. When Winfrid was in Germany he
kept up an active correspondence with nuns in
England, and from them received presents of books
copied out with their own hands. " Often," says
he in 725 to Eadburga, abbess of Minster, "gifts
of books and vestments, the proofs of your love,
WOMEN UNDER THE RULE in
have been to me a consolation in misfortune. So
I pray you will continue as you have begun, and
write for me in golden letters , the epistle of the
holy apostle St. Paul, my master," &c.2 Nor was
she an exception ; for, as Montalembert says : —
"The Anglo-Saxon race above all was rich in
women of this kind : many are to be found among
the princesses established in the numerous abbeys
of England — such as Edith, natural daughter of
King Edgar; who, brought up by her mother in
the nunnery at Wilton, was famed there equally
for her knowledge and her virtue." He goes on
to speak of Lioba of Wimborne, who went to join
Winfrid. " She was so eager for knowledge that
she never left her books save for divine service.
She was well versed in all that were then called
the liberal arts ; she was thoroughly acquainted
with the writings of the Fathers and canon-law ;
cultivated Latin verse and showed her attempts
to St. Boniface (Winfrid) who admired them greatly.
... To her is due the honour of having trained
in Christian knowledge the young girls who filled
the new nunneries, founded under the teaching
of the Saxon missionaries. The Germans really
owe to her the introduction among them of that
monastic culture which, later, was to shine with
1 Saxon nuns excelled in illuminating manuscripts. Wilfrid brought
to England the art of writing in gold, and owned a copy of the Gospels
written on purple-coloured parchments, in letters of pure gold.
2 S. Bonafacii Epistolce (ed. Migne), n. xix. p. 712.
ii2 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
such brilliance in the person of Hroswitha, the
illustrious nun of Gandersheim, whose greatest
glory was to have composed the plays which she
caused to be acted in her abbey. These dramas
astonish us by the extraordinary acquaintance they
prove with the authors of classic antiquity — Plautus,
Virgil, Terence, and Horace — and yet more by a
knowledge of the human heart truly remarkable in
a woman completely shut out from the world." l
The nuns knew Latin and could write it. For
the superiors this was almost a necessity. It was
not till after the rise of the universities, when
learning ceased to be a monopoly of the religious
houses, that documents for nuns began to be written
in French, then as now the language of culture,
or in English. This decline in learning coincided
with the period when convents of women were at
a lower ebb than they had ever been, both in point
of numbers and of influence.
Besides intellectual studies of all kinds, needle-
work held an important place. The embroidering
of our English nuns earned a reputation far and
wide as the finest work to be had. Bishops and
popes prided themselves on specimens of the famed
opus Anglicanum, and were consumed with envy
when they saw the richly embroidered vestments 2
1 Monks of the West (ed. Ninimo), vol. v. pp. 133, 134.
2 Professor J. H. Middleton points out, in a note to his Illuminated
Manuscripts in Classical and Mediaeval Times, p. 112, that the popes
of the period, when they sent the pall to a newly elected archbishop
of England, suggested they would like in return some embroidered
WOMEN UNDER THE RULE 113
of English bishops or abbats sitting in council
with the rest of the clergy.
"The most famous embroidered vestments now
preserved in various places in Italy are the handi-
work of English embroiderers between 1250 and
1300, though their authorship is not as a rule
recognised by their present possessors." 1
The convents were almost the only houses of
education for girls, and even for little boys. Dom
Gasquet quotes old John Aubrey, as witness for
what he knew of St. Mary's convent near Kington
St. Michael in Wiltshire.
"There the young maids were brought up (not
as at Hakney Sarum Schools, &c, to learn pride
and wantonness) but at the nunneries, where they
had examples of piety, and humility, and modesty,
and obedience to imitate and to practise. Here
they learned needle-work, the art of confectionery,
surgery (for anciently there were no apothecaries or
surgeons — the gentlewomen did cure their poor
vestments of English, work. And Matthew Paris has an instructive
passage on the point. When Innocent IV. saw the beautiful vestments
worn (in 1246) by the English prelates who came to Rome, he asked
where they were made ; and on hearing in England, he exclaimed,
"Truly England is our storehouse of delights, a very inexhaustible
well : and where much abounds much can be extorted from many."
He incontinently sent letters to the cistercian abbats here, ordering
them to forward to him gold embroidery for the use of his chapel,
" as though," says Matthew, " they could get it for nothing." — Chronica
Majora (Roll Series), vol iv. pp. 546, 547.
1 Middleton, p. 112. Such as the "Lateran Cope" in Rome, the
"Piccolomini Cope" at Pienza, and those at Anagni, Florence, and
Bologna.
VOL. I. H
ii4 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
neighbours : their hands are now too fine), physic,
writing, drawing, &c. Old Jacques could see from
his house the nuns of the priory come forth into
the nymph-hay (meadow) with their rooks (distaffs)
and wheels to spin, and with their sewing work.
He would say that he had told three score and ten ;
but of nuns there were not so many, but in all, with
lay sisters, as widows, old maids, and young girls,
there might be such a number. This was a fine
way of bringing up young women, who are led more
by example than precept ; and a good retirement for
widows and grave single women to a civil, virtuous,
and holy life." x
From this we may gather that convents afforded
also a place of retreat and quiet life to women who,
not having any vocation for the religious life, wished
to share in some of its privileges without under-
taking the obligations.
The religious life of the nuns was the same as
that of their brethren. The ever-recurring sacrifice
of prayer and praise formed their lives to a simpli-
city and singleness of eye.
The records of visitations2 tell us there was a
1 Dom Gasquet, Henry VIII. and the English Monasteries, vol. ii.
p. 224.
2 In the Visitations of the Diocese of Norwich (Dr. Jessop) we get a
"useful light on the inner life of convents in these parts ; provided
we bear in mind that these visitations record only the complaints
made and the murmurings, without going into the question whether
they were founded or unfounded ; whereas, if all goes well, the whole
business is despatched in a word or two : Omnia esse bene (Camden
Soc. Publications, New Series, No. XCIII.).
WOMEN UNDER THE RULE 115
great deal of human nature in convent life, then, as
there must be always. One of the very charms of
the monastic life is that it does not try to destroy
nature but to elevate it. That this is a long process
in some cases is clear, and one uncomfortable both
to oneself and to others. But this is just the point
in which the common life is of service in the work
of moral education. Bearing and forbearing is the
secret of happiness, when living with our fellow-
men, and how much more in the family life of a
monastery? This was one of the human sacra-
mentals that St. Benedict relied upon so strongly
in forming his disciples to the image of Christ. The
various spiritual exercises of recent introduction are
not of the essence of the beuedictine vocation,
though some find a use in them. But the large and
deep minded Dom Baker (of whom anon), the most
original and remarkable spiritual writer among
English Catholics in the days of persecution, who
was so fully possessed by the spirit of his state, lays
the greatest stress on the careful fulfilling of the
duties of the common life as a necessary require-
ment in those who, as the result of long probation,
are called to the simple and direct union with God
in contemplation.
Here we will leave the subject of the daughters
of St. Benedict, closing with the words of a recent
writer on their social influence : —
"It is unnecessary to speak of the many blessings
which must have accrued to a neighbourhood by
n6 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
the presence of a convent of cultivated English
ladies. Their gentle teaching was the first ex-
perience of the youthful poor; from them they
derived their early knowledge of the elements of
religion and of Catholic practice ; to them they
went in the troubles and cares of life as to a source
of good advice ; theirs was the most potent civi-
lising influence in the rough days of the Middle
Ages ; and theirs was the task of tendering the sick
and smoothing the passage of the Christian soul to
eternity." * As has been well said, benedictine
nuns " were indeed not of the world, but they
were in it, actively and intelligently to do a good
work to it — to elevate, to console, to purify, and to
bless.''2
1 Dom Gasquet, op, cit. p. 221. 2 Ibid. p. 220,
CHAPTEK VII
CHRONICLES OF THE CONGREGATION. I
Hitherto we have been occupied with the his-
tory of the black monks in England up to the
period when the general chapter was appointed
for the whole of England. We must now con-
tinue the history up to the eve of the fall of the
monasteries.
The great abbeys at this period had reached their
zenith, and by their wealth and numbers were some
of the most important institutions in the country.
Their influence was felt not only in the neighbour-
hood of each monastery — for great landlords, such
as the monks were, will always have power — but
also in Parliament. There the abbats of the black
monks alone outnumbered even the bishops ; for
no less than twenty-eight of them sat as barons of
the realm to some eighteen bishops.1 And there
are respects in which they were more in touch with
the common feeling of the country than even were
the bishops ; for these last were rulers of large
1 Together with the other abbats who had seats in Parliament, the
number was fifty-two. The cathedral priors of Canterbury who were
mitred also had a seat.
n8 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
dioceses, were often statesmen, and immersed in
affairs necessitating their absence from home ; while
the abbat was, with the exception of his attendance
at Parliament, almost always living in the midst of
the people. The mutual relations of benedictine
abbat and secular bishop were on the whole good ;
for, with the exception of the five exempt monas-
teries, the bishop had all rights of visitation over
the houses of black monks in his diocese.1 With
these exemptions friction was more likely to occur,
especially when the exact limits of rights on either
side were not defined. But for the last hundred or
hundred and fifty years the mutual privileges were
known and respected, and therefore a greater har-
mony existed.
Of the disputes between monastic chapters and
their bishops (after the thirteenth century very rare),
one very noteworthy example occurs in the case
of the monks of Christ Church, Canterbury, who
formed the chapter of the primatial church, and
the archbishop of the see, Edmund Rich, known to
history as St. Edmund. The dispute seems to have
arisen (1237) in this manner. The archbishop was
ex-officio abbat of the house : but this in reality
meant less than appears. The affairs of the mon-
astery and all internal discipline were governed by
the cathedral prior, who however was appointed to
1 It is to be understood that all the houses of the cluniacs, the white
monks or cistercians, and the white canons or premonstratensians,
were exempt.
CHRONICLES OF THE CONGREGATION 119
his office by the archbishop after the convent had
been consulted. He also had the power (a most
important one) of admitting any one into the
novitiate1 and to profession, and also selected one
out of the three names elected for the greater
officers. These rights, together with a power of
visitation, were about all the abbatial functions of
the archbishop. But this did not satisfy archbishop
Edmund. A saintly man, of great personal austerity,
with a high ideal of his position, of inflexible pur-
pose when he once saw what he considered to be
his rights and duty, he was just the sort of man
who naturally would not stay to consider any other
view of things. He seems to have acted as though
he had the faculty of intuitively arriving at a con-
clusion without being obliged to consider the steps
by which it is reached. The result was inevitable.
He found himself embroiled in perpetual disputes.
The irony of fate was the more remarkable, for all
his biographers state that personally he had the
greatest horror of litigation. In these matters, un-
fortunately for himself and for all with whom he
had to do, he trusted himself into the hands of
others, notably Simon Langton, one of the arch-
deacons, a bitter and disappointed man. What-
ever cause may be assigned to it, the fact remains
1 At Worcester, and therefore more likely at the other cathedral
monasteries, the prior, sede vacante, had also the right of admitting
novices. See Registrum Prioratus B. M. Wigorniensis (Camden Soc),
p. 138. As to Christ Church, see Literce Cantuarienses (Roll Series),
vol. i. pp. 18, 117.
120 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
that the archiepiscopate of St. Edmund was by no
means a peaceful one.1
In the case of Christ Church, Canterbury, Edmund
claimed as abbat the right of disposing of the
monastic property, and had acted to the grave pre-
judice of the rights and liberties enjoyed by the
monks in respect to certain churches appropriated to
the monastery, to certain manors, possessions, perqui-
sites, and services due from their tenants, &c. The
monks in self-defence appealed to the pope (Gregory
IX.). He, on December 22, 1235, appointed as
judges in the dispute three abbats, who to avoid
partiality were taken from the cistercian, premonstra-
tensian, and augustinian orders.2 The parties con-
cerned were summoned in the pope's name to appear
on May 10, 1236, at Eochester. The monks were
represented there by their proctor, but no arch-
bishop. Again was he summoned for June 20, but
he took no notice. An attempt was made to settle
the matter by compromise, but with no effect. At
last, after several other citations, of all which the
archbishop took no notice, when the final one was
1 The state of the Church in England in St. Edmund's day was not
happy. On one hand the kings, John and Henry III., were by no
means nursing fathers ; and on the other the popes, or those on whom
they relied, were using it to enrich Italian clerics. Men who neither
resided in England, nor knew a word of the language, were appointed
to good livings in England, overriding the rights of patrons who either
themselves or by their ancestors had founded these benefices. Deep
and bitter was the resentment in the land ; and it found expression in
the laws excluding non-resident aliens from English livings.
2 The abbats of Boxley, St. Kadegund, and Lesnes.
CHRONICLES OF THE CONGREGATION 121
issued for May 7, 1237 (a year after the first), then
King Henry III. suddenly intervened and forbade
the judges to proceed. At this sudden interference
of the civil power in behalf of the archbishop, the
judges dared take no further steps. Henry, who
was anxious just then to keep on good terms with
the pope (from whom he was daily expecting a
legate to support his claims against the stand made
by Edmund and others on behalf of English liberties),
ordered (July 10) that nothing more should be done
until he could talk over the matter with the legate.
The pope meanwhile had also written ordering, in
case of opposition, the whole case to be brought
before his supreme tribunal. After the arrival of
the legate, Otho, the judges saw him, and then held
a meeting at Boxley, on August 31, whence they
wrote a letter to the archbishop, who still kept
away. After rehearsing all that had taken place in
the matter, and stating they were hindered by the
king from obeying the pope's commission, the
abbats, in accordance with the apostolic mandate,
fixed January 26, 1238, as the day upon which the
litigants should appear before his holiness in Rome.
Edmund, perhaps, now had begun to see the
matter in another light, and was anxious to make
amends — the more so as it had reached his ears
that he was being charged w7ith ingratitude to the
men who had elected him archbishop. This was
a new aspect of things ; and he began to realise
that they were a body with rights of their own. To
122 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
see this and promptly act was characteristic of the
archbishop's impulsive and humble soul. He went
to Canterbury and " entered the chapter-house in
an attitude of deep humility, in the hope of allaying
the commotion by calm reasoning and sweet modera-
tion ; for he did not wish to be thought unmindful
of the confidence which the monks had bestowed
upon him ; indeed it cut him to the quick to think
he should even appear ungrateful. Consequently he
conceded all their requests so far as to remove any
obstacle to an honourable and satisfactory arrange-
ment being made. The monks, one and all, gladly
consented to his terms, and they thanked God and
the archbishop for this happy termination of the
dispute. Edmund then announced to the chapter
that he would go to Eome to get the approval of the
Holy See to the arrangement that had been made." *
The archbishop had several other disputes on
hand, with various houses of black monks who had
appealed to Rome for protection against his claims.
He wanted to make a visitation of Westminster
abbey, a house exempt from all episcopal control,
and, moreover, not even in his diocese. In this
project he was opposed both by the monks, who
claimed their privilege, and also by the bishop of
London, who protested against his intrusion. St.
1 Eustace's Vita Sancti Edmundi, f. 139, given in Life of St. Edmund,
by Dom Wilfrid Wallace, O.S.B., and quoted at p. 235. The author
was a monk of Christ Church, but attached to the person of the
archbishop as chaplain.
CHRONICLES OF THE CONGREGATION 123
Augustine's at Canterbury, too, was another stone
of offence to the archbishop. Exempt itself, the
abbey claimed for all its churches and manors free-
dom from episcopal visitation. A compromise, on
the whole favourable to the monks, was entered into.
They did not care, perhaps, to push matters too
far, as it was said some of the bulls on which they
relied would not bear too close inspection.1 Then,
again, in the neighbouring diocese of Rochester
Edmund was involved in disputes with the monastic
chapter; for he claimed the right of appointing the
bishop, and would not allow of the monks' right
of election. In all the cases that went to Eome,
Edmund was worsted. He practically had no case
except sic jubeo sic volo.
1 Forgery, or the art of making history, was certainly not unknown
in those happily uncritical ages ; and one is constantly thwarted in
research by documents which turn out not what they purport to
be. We should doubt, however, if the intention of the writers of
such documents always was to deceive. When the courts insisted,
in cases of litigation, on the production of charters in regard to
property held for four or five hundred years, the original deeds of
which had been destroyed by foreign invasion or civil broils, the
case was met by the production of documents, not original indeed
but embodying the facts. " Forgery " applied to such a case needs a
gloss, and it must not be at once assumed that the "forgers" were
the rogues implied by our own modern use of the term. It is a
commonplace in legal history, that when courts of law will press their
conditions in a way which is felt to be undue, they will generally
meet their match on their own ground ; for instance, the whole question
of conveying estates for uses or bequests for masses for the dead. In
the twelfth and thirteenth centuries people went a much more simple
way to work ; but the principle was the same. The history of the
methods employed to meet on their own grounds laws felt to be
unduly pressed, is a subject worthy of the " Philosophic Historian."
i24 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
When Edmund reached Rome (1238), he found, to
his intense surprise, some of the Canterbury monks.
A strong feeling had been gaining ground in that
convent that they had gone beyond their legal
rights in compromising many points with the arch-
bishop. Their feelings had been touched, and,
under that influence, had given a consent which
after-thought did not warrant. The archbishop
and his party were bitterly affected at finding an
appeal pending on a matter they thought had been
settled. Archdeacon Langton, Edmund's chief ad-
viser, did not scruple to deny the validity of their
grants ; and, in the words of the continuator of
Gervase, " vomited forth his venom before the pope,
and said : ' Holy Father, there is no species of
forgery which is not perpetrated in the Church of
Canterbury. They forge in gold, in lead, in wax, in
anything you please.' " 1 To settle this question,
the pope sent orders to Otho to go to Canterbury
and make a search into the monks' claims. All
duplicate documents were to be shared between the
archbishop and the chapter ; but any found to be
forged or of suspected authenticity were to be
sent to Rome for the pope's inspection. When the
charge of forgery was gone into, it turned out to be
that a charter of St. Thomas a Becket, well known
to exist, had been damaged beyond repair ; and
three of the monks, in all simplicity, had made a
new copy to which they had attached the old seal.
1 Gervasii Opera (Roll Series), vol. ii. p. 132.
CHRONICLES OF THE CONGREGATION 125
But while at Rome, finding unavailing all hopes
of a compromise with the agents of the monks, the
archbishop was urged on to issue excommunication
against all disturbers of the peace, or rather of his
peace. He left Rome, as we have said, worsted upon
all matters in dispute, and with the difficulty with his
chapter still open. On reaching England, he went
with the cardinal legate to investigate the charge of
forgery, which resulted, as stated above, in a moral
acquittal; although punishment was inflicted upon
the monks who had appended the old seal to the new
copy, and the prior was deposed by the archbishop.
The archbishop's pretensions were only increased
by the firm opposition he met with ; and now he
went so far as to take steps to transfer the cathedral
into the hands of secular canons. The dispute be-
came a matter of life or death with the monks, and
they fought the archbishop with grim pertinacity.
Suspensions were issued and were treated with scant
respect ; for the archbishop had for the time being
no longer jurisdiction over them on the disputed
points, their cause being before the Holy See. He
refused to appoint a new prior until the monks had
returned to their obedience, a question which they
persisted was still sub judice. Matters got graver,
and each party more obstinate. At last, on January
9, 1239, he interdicted the whole convent, and later
on excommunicated his primatial chapter, and on
November 3, 1239, published the sentence through-
out the whole province.
i26 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
But meanwhile the cause at Rome was dragging
on its weary length. At home it seems that the
sentence of excommunication, certainly invalid, was
not taken much notice of by the people of the
diocese. This made the archbishop more deter-
mined to enforce his will ; and he appealed to the
secular power, in the shape of the sheriff of Kent, to
enforce his decree. The idea got abroad that the
archbishop intended to seize the temporalities of
the monastery. The monks in alarm appealed to
the king, who ordered his sheriffs not to interfere.
Fresh excommunications are sent out against all
who should support the monks ; and then, all of
a sudden, matters drop. The archbishop, sick at
heart and hopeless, leaves his diocese and retires to
the cistercian abbey of Pontigny, in the neighbour-
hood of which he died, November 16, 1240.
We have dwelt on this dispute in order to let the
reader see the sort of trouble monastic chapters had
to put up with until the situation was cleared ;
troubles in this case all the harder to bear, because
the personal holiness of the archbishop was so great.
It is no disrespect to the memory of a great saint
to say he was not made of the stuff out of which a
ruler is made, and was wanting in that tact so neces-
sary for dealing with men.1
1 A recent Life of St. Edmund, by Dom Wilfrid Wallace of Erdington,
takes a view of the dispute diametrically opposite to the one given
above. The conclusion we have arrived at is based primarily on the
very evidence the writer brings forward to support his contention. The
author, a former student of St. Edmund's College, Ware, seems to have
CHRONICLES OF THE CONGREGATION 127
This dispute was the greatest and practically the
last of the disputes between bishops and monastic
chapters. It cleared the air and made the rights of
either party known ; and so the way of peace was
henceforth smooth.
The Lateran Council had ordered certain reforms
to take place among the benedictines of each
country. As we have seen, steps were immediately
taken in England (and England alone it was that
obeyed unquestionably) to carry out the pope's de-
sire. When the legate Otho came to England, he
held a national council in London late in 1237;
and among decrees affecting the English Church at
large, he made some (No. XIX.) regarding the black
monks.1 But two years after, a conference of the
benedictine abbats was held under his presidency
in London, at which some of these regulations,
notably about the perpetual abstinence, were modi-
fied. The decrees of this conference were carried
out by the abbats. What these regulations were,
it will be useful to mention; for unfortunately " re-
formation" has a bad sound in England, and, in
overlooked the fact that eminent personal sanctity does not necessarily
imply those gifts which a governor, unless he is to fail, must possess.
As a matter of fact, St. Edmund fell foul of every one from the highest
to the lowest, priest and laymen, with whom his great office brought
him in contact. Bishop Stubbs with his "best of archbishops" (Ger-
vase of Canterbury, II. p. xx.) falls into the same mistake. Edmund's
sudden retirement to the cistercian monastery of Pontigny seems
evidence that the saint recognised himself, and had the courage to act
on the knowledge.
1 Wilkins, Concilia, vol. i. p. 653.
128 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
the popular mind, "reformation of monks" implies
a state of immorality and vice as existent. While
on one hand it would be idle to deny that, among
so many, some few might be found who were un-
worthy, this is only to say that human nature exists,
and is never destroyed. But when the aim of the
monk's life is considered, the safeguards with which
he is surrounded, and the public opinion, both in
and out of the monastery, it is impossible for any un-
prejudiced mind, in face of the facts, for a moment
to entertain the idea that monasteries could ever,
unchecked, get to a depth of depravity such as the
vulgar, for whom tradition has been falsified, love
to imagine. The reforms, of which we give a
summary, instituted by Otho, with the cordial con-
sent of the abbats, show in what direction changes
were considered desirable.
Monks were not to be professed before twenty
years of age ; novices, after their probation, were
either to be professed at once or dismissed ; no
payment was to be exacted from those who wished
to enter as monks ; no monk to have anything of
his own ; they were not to farm landed property ;
no monk is to be set to a charge which will require
him to live alone ; all officers, three times a year,
have to give in their accounts ; the abbat once a
year to all his community ; possessors of private
property were to be punished ; silence duly ob-
served ; flesh meat forbidden (this was modified
two years later) ; monks to be properly clothed, to
CHRONICLES OF THE CONGREGATION 129
sleep in one common dormitory, all to be present
at divine office, at least for collation and compline ;
abbats and prelates to be moderate in their equipages
and expenditure, &c.
No word, no hint of any deep-seated depravity,
but only an endeavour to recall the monk to those
observances which hedge in the higher paths to
which he had bound himself by his vows.
We have now to consider the question of the alien
priories, which were found to be a somewhat disturb-
ing element in English monasticism as being under
foreign influence (this holds good in particular of
the cluniac houses), and ruled according to foreign
modes of thought. The Normans, when they came
to England, left friends behind them. They were
also descendants of the founders of many noble
monasteries. It was but natural that the conquerors
should wish to share the sweets of victory with their
friends. Consequently they gave English churches
and tithes and manors to Norman and French abbeys.
The monks of these houses abroad, in order to
protect their rights, and gather in their rents and
dues, built cells or small convents on their newly
acquired? property. This was the origin of the alien
priories, which existed simply and solely for the
benefit of foreign prelates. Having for the most
part no interest in England except material profit,
these alien priories formed the weak spot in monastic '
affairs ; and it was not long before the civil power
had to take cognisance of their existence.
vol. 1. 1
X3o THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
The houses were of two kinds. Some, regular
convents, only paying a yearly tribute (apportus) to
the house abroad ; and others, depending entirely
upon the foreign prelates, who appointed at will
superiors and subjects, with the main duty of reap-
ing a harvest, and promoting the interest of those
at home. As can be easily understood, the English
found in these alien houses had to accommodate
themselves to the law of those with whom they had
incorporated themselves. The fact, too, that the
monks were far away from their own superiors over
the seas naturally opened the door to abuses. The
general chapter began to take the matter in hand,
and summoned the superiors to attend the meetings
under pain of excommunication, unless they could
show due cause of exemption. But before anything
effectual could be done, the civil power took up the
question.1
King John began the work and made the priories,
then eighty-one in number, pay into his hands the
money they used to send abroad.2 But in 1294,
on the occasion of his war for the recovery of
Guienne, Edward, among other means of extorting
1 From first to last there were between ioo and 150 of these alien
priories. " The cluniac houses alone during the reign of Edward III.
are said to have forwarded no less than ^2000 a year (about ,£60,000
of our money) to the monastery at Cluni. When France and England
were at peace, this transmission of wealth out of the country was
tolerated by the English rulers ; war however brought the subject
prominently before them, and led to various acts of suppression and
confiscation" (Dom Gasquet, vol. i. p. 42).
2 Canon Dixon, History of the Church of England, vol. i. p. 321.
CHRONICLES OF THE CONGREGATION 131
money, seized all the alien priories and used their
revenues for the purposes of war; and, to prevent
the foreign monks from acting as spies and helping
his enemies, he removed them twenty miles from
the sea-coast.1
So convenient a way of getting money, with the
additional pleasure of knowing it was hampering
the enemy, was sure to commend itself to other
kings. Edward II., and then Edward III. (who at
first had restored many of them) pursued the same
policy.
Not only the king, but Parliament also saw the
danger of these houses. Several acts had been
passed declaring it unlawful for religious persons
to send money to their houses beyond the seas.
And a few years after the conclusion of the peace
with France (1361), Parliament pointed out that,
" in consequence of the priories and other religious
houses subject to foreign monasteries being filled
with Frenchmen who acted as spies," such houses
were danger-spots in the whole body politic.
In the earlier years of Edward III., some of these
monasteries became naturalised or made denizen on
their own petition.2
1 Ibid.
2 In the cluniac houses, which in course of time numbered English
subjects, there was for long a feeling of dissatisfaction, which at last
found vent in a petition to Parliament (1330) stating their grievances,
and asking for a remedy. The causes of such dissatisfactions may be
sufficiently gathered from the record of the visitations published by
Sir G. F. Duckett. " For example, the monks of Thetford abbey re-
presented that the appointment of their superior was in the hands of
132 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
At last some of the foreign houses began to sell
their English property for what they could get.
Under Henry IV. their position became every day
more precarious. The outcries of the Lollards
against the wealth of the abbeys, and the clamours
not only for their confiscation but for that of all
church property, pointed out the approaching doom
of at least the alien priories. Henry V. in 14 14
took the final step, and suppressed them all. Their
estates were vested in the Crown, and were mostly
bestowed upon other monasteries or schools. In
the instructions drawn up for his ambassador to the
Council of Basle, where it was thought some of
the foreign houses would attempt to regain their
property, Henry V. declares he had applied to the
pope (Martin V.) for leave to convert the revenues
into endowment for religious houses and other
sacred purposes. He also says that liberal com-
pensation had been paid to the former owners for
the loss of their possessions.1
Suppression or absorption was the inevitable end
of the alien priories. Those houses which continued
as denizen priories had not got rid of the foreign
the abbot of Cluni. This might have been tolerated when the religious
were foreigners, but not when they and their prior were all of them
English. They wished therefore to be free from their union with the
French abbey, and from the subsidy required of them by their foreign
brethren. In the same way the priory of Holy Trinity, York, asked to
be declared an English foundation on the same footing as other religious
houses " (Dom Gasquet, vol. i. p. 48).
1 Beckington Correspondence. Roll Series, vol. ii. pp. 263-265.
CHRONICLES OF THE CONGREGATION 133
influence when the dissolution came, and were some
of the very first to succumb to the attack.
Another great feature in the Chronicles of the
Congregation of English black monks was the
terrible visitation called the "Black Death," in
1348-49. Its effects were lasting, and had a great
deal to do, as Dom Gasquet 1 shows, in shaping the
course of events leading to the Reformation. The
monasteries felt the scourge to the utmost. For
instance, at Westminster the abbat and twenty-six
of his monks succumbed. The effect of this terrible
disaster was felt for many succeeding generations.
" According to Knighton's Chronicle there existed
such distress and such a universal ' loosening of the
bonds of society' as is 'only to be found,' says
Mason, * in the description of earthquakes in South
America ; ' whole villages died out, cities shrunk
within their walls, and the houses becoming unoccu-
pied, fell into ruins. The agricultural population
suffered as severely as that of the towns. The land
fell out of cultivation on account of the difficulty
of securing labourers, except at enormous wages.
Mocks were attacked by diseases, and perished from
want of herdsmen to watch them. The corn crops,
which were unusually rich in the year 1348, rotted
on the ground, as no honest men were to be found
to reap them. The monastery of Christ Church,
Canterbury, even with its rich endowments, felt the
pinch of poverty. In asking from the bishop of
1 Cf. " The Black Death," passim.
i34 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
Rochester the impropriation of the Church of
Westerham to help them to keep up their old
hospitality, they pleaded excessive poverty, caused
by * the great pestilence affecting man and beast ! '
In furtherance of this suit they forward to the
bishop a list of their losses in cattle, which amount
to 257 oxen, 511 cows with their calves, and 4585
sheep, estimated to be worth in money ,£792,
12s. 6d., or more than ;£ 16,000 of our money.
Nor is this all, for they declare that 12 12 acres of
land formerly profitable to them had been rendered
useless by an inundation of the sea, from the
impossibility of getting labourers to maintain the
sea walls.1
The economic changes resulting from such a visi-
tation were tantamount to a social revolution. The
feudal system gave way. Retainers could no longer
be kept on a land which failed to support even the
owners. Only the largest landlords could possibly
stand the strain. The peasant proprietor had to
give up his holding and take to trade or handicraft
in the town. In the course of the fifteenth century
the old historic nobility of England became so im-
poverished, or reduced by the civil wars, that their
power left them ; and a new nobility arose, who
looked to the king and depended upon him for
their lives and possessions. The direct outcome
was the despotism of the Tudors, who found none
to question their wills.
1 Gasquet, vol. i. pp. 4, 5.
CHRONICLES OF THE CONGREGATION 135
One of the immediate effects on the monasteries
was the diminution of the numbers of their inha-
bitants. The times were in a state of upheaval,
and were thus unfavourable to the development of
the peaceful benedictine life. Comparatively few
new men came to fill the ranks thinned by death.
Roughly speaking, the communities were reduced
to one half, corresponding, as far as can be inferred,
to the reduction of the population.
After the visitation of 1348-49, there had been a
real difficulty in finding religious of mature age
and of sufficient experience to take the place of
the superiors who had succumbed. This, together
with the other causes we mentioned, inevitably
tended to a relaxation of the higher life. In 1422,
Henry V. summoned the abbats and other prelates
to meet him at Westminster to discuss the situa-
tion. It appears from Thomas of Walsingham,
that certain false brethren had prejudiced the king
against the order by asserting that many, both
abbats and monks, had fallen away from the primi-
tive institution and observance of the monastic state,
and that a reform was urgently needed. It may
have struck the reader, on the other hand, how all
along the body was possessed of so much strength
and vitality, that it was able from time to time to
shake off, without outside pressure, any relaxations
and abuses which had crept in unawares. So it
was in this case. Sixty abbats and other superiors,
together with over three hundred monks, assembled
136 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
at Westminster.1 The king, accompanied by only
four persons, went to meet them in the chapter-
house, and at his request Edmund Lacy, bishop
of Exeter, one of his suite, addressed the monks.
Then the king himself reminded them of the piety
of his ancestors and others, in the foundation and
support of so many religious houses ; he expected
them to remedy any abuses which they might find
to exist, and to return to the former strictness which
of old had made the orders so renowned. And
here it may be mentioned in passing how the kings
of England, comparing in this with the kings of
France, had always fostered, protected, and defended
the benedictines, until the days of the despoiler
Henry VIII. ; not only protecting them in their
material interests, but by showing a regard for
their best and highest welfare. The premier abbat,
William Heyworth of St. Albans, presided at the
following deliberations, and several articles were
agreed upon and drawn up, to be presented to
the next general chapter for approval.2 From the
decrees we see the nature of the reforms, which
were entirely on the lines of former regulations.
The abbats are to moderate their style of living,
they are to live more among their brethren ; 3 once
1 It is useful to note how large these gatherings were, and how truly-
representative of all interests.
2 Wilkins, Concilia, vol. iii. pp. 413-427.
3 This was evidently a weak point, and the very greatness of their
position was a real drawback in the case of men of a less high ideal.
CHRONICLES OF THE CONGREGATION 137
a year they have to give in a full account to the
monks of the state of the abbey ; they are to take
care of and not alienate the monastic property.
The monks are to be clothed alike. The use of
meat is regulated, and the monastic fasts enforced.
The monks are not to handle money, but are to
have their wants supplied in kind. They are only
to go out once a year to visit their friends. The
abbat is to supply them with the necessary funds,
for which on return they must account. He also
has to supply suitable companions for the journey.
The old rule of sleeping in their habits to be en-
forced.1 At the general chapter that followed, most
of these reforms were accepted. One change was
made as regards money supplied to the monks for
any purposes of their own. They were, at least
once a year, to give in an account of what they
had spent, to the abbat, who could at will call
for such account. Any balance that remained had
to be returned to the house. As regards the fasts,
it was decreed that as in all well-regulated monas-
teries they were no longer observed, so instead
supper was not to be allowed on those days, unless
to the weak or old.
Thomas de la Marc, Clement Lichfield, John Wheathamstead, and
Richard Whiting, show how a great position might be united with a
strict care for their primary duties as fathers of their convents.
1 It must be remembered that St. Benedict legislated for the custom
of his monks sleeping in an open dormitory. Some form of night-
clothing was then required. But in the secular world, for centuries
after, the use of night-clothes was unknown.
138 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
A new season of vigour came over the body.
And when, a hundred years after, the dissolution
came, it found the greater majority of the houses
of the black monks living lives in edifying obser-
vances. All, both monks and abbats, seem to have
risen to a sense of the requirement of the time.
Piety and learning were flourishing in their houses
at the moment when the hand of the destroyer
was laid upon them, and the tendency was always
in the upward direction.
But before taking up the story of the dissolution,
we must just give a glance at the state of Benedic-
tinism on the continent. For although the English
houses were independent of all foreign control, as
they were independent of one another, yet still, as
brethren united by an intimate tie of far more effici-
ency than any outer bond, they were influenced by
and felt the effects of a revival that was going on
simultaneously in Italy and Spain and Germany.
As these movements had a most important bearing
upon the history of the benedictines of England
after the Reformation, a word as to their nature
and history is here necessary.
The great cause of the decline of the benedictine
life on the continent, and especially in Italy and
France, was the hateful system of commendam}
Laymen got possession of the revenues of monas-
1 Commendam never obtained in England. The only case as regards
the abbeys was that of Wolsey, who held the abbey of St. Albans in
commendam ( 1 5 2 1 ).
CHRONICLES OF THE CONGREGATION 139
teries and bestowed them on their children, who
received the tonsure only to avoid the law forbid-
ding any but clerics to hold ecclesiastical benefices.
To such a pitch did the evil get, that mere chil-
dren held abbacies; who when they arrived at
man's estate differed in their mode of life no-
thing from the laymen about them. Certain abbeys
had come to be looked upon as the ordinary pro-
vision for the support of cadets of noble houses.
The monks were themselves to blame in great
part for a state which cut at the very root of
monastic life. They had allowed the income to
be divided into two portions ; one for themselves
and one for the abbat. This last became a " bene-
fice" ; and so an object of ambition on the part of
crafty and unscrupulous persons. Then, moreover,
the portion allotted to the support of the monks
became cut up and subdivided among the various
officers charged with the administration of the
house. These also became looked upon as bene-
fices, and were bought and sold and given away.
No wonder was it, then, with this break-up of the
common life, that the family idea, and with it mon-
astic discipline, decayed. Once the system was
introduced, those houses in which there was no
division were, if anything, worse off, for their
commendatory abbats possessed the whole income,
and, almost without exception, concerned them-
selves with drawing the revenues and assigning a
small pitance to the wretched and dwindling com-
i4o THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
munity, who had fallen into the position of mere
rent-charges.
The natural remedy would seem to have been the
reassertion of community life and of the rights of
electing their own abbat and governing themselves ;
but such was the temper of the times, that all efforts
at remedying the evil seemed in vain. Thirty
synods had been held, and popes had issued decree
after decree, but all had been ineffectual. At last
the man appeared who should make the practice of
commendam no longer possible among black monks.
Barbo, abbat of the monastery of St. Justina at
Padua, began the work and achieved it by what was
no less than a complete revolution in the theory of
benedictine government. He constructed a system,
which, if it did not directly cut away the root of the
evil, at least killed its offshoots, and stood ready to
snip the bud of any attempt at future growth. In
his reform no officer, not even the abbat, was to be
appointed for a term of more than three years.
Hence there could be no vested rights in an office,
or anything approaching the nature of a benefice.
By ordering a triennial chapter at which all officers
had to give in an account of their administration, it
was out of the power of any one to appropriate, or
wish to retain, the property which belonged to all.
A return was made to the common life both for
abbats and monks, and the income was no longer
divided. When this system was developed and
other abbeys joined on to the reform of St. Justina,
CHRONICLES OF THE CONGREGATION 141
the election of abbats, &c., was vested in the general
chapter alone ; thus securing at least freedom of
choice from outward interference. The reform of
St. Justina, a drastic remedy for a terrible disease,
was successful and rapidly spread through Italy ;
and when Monte Cassino itself adopted it, Julius II.
gave the name of " Cassinese Congregation " to
the whole body of these reformed benedictines of
Italy.
The monasteries of Spain took up some of the
features of this reform from Italy ; and the famous
congregation of Valladolid formed itself in many
respects on similar lines to those of St. Justina's
abbey.
In Germany, too, the movement spread ; and the
great congregation of Bursfeld took its beginning
from John Dederoth, abbat of Eheinhausen, after-
wards of Bursfeld, which house became the centre
of the reform. The statutes of Bursfeld were gradu-
ally introduced elsewhere, until at last it began to
be looked upon as the central house of the reformed
monks of Germany. A general chapter was held
in 1446; and by 1502 no less than ninety houses
were on its roll. The Bursfeld Union made no
such break with tradition as did the Cassinese.
The abbats were elected for life.
In France a closer union of the black monks did
not take place until the seventeenth century, when
the congregations of St. Maur and St. Vannes re-
newed the benedictine glories of France. But the
142 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
revolution in government, instituted by Barbo to
remedy an evil, brought with it an inherent weak-
ness which in time developed itself. This, the
break-up of the family, a fundamental idea of St.
Benedict, was the price that had to be paid.
CHAPTER VIII
THE DOWNFALL
In the previous chapter we have seen events in
England, in the fifteenth century, shaping them-
selves in such a direction that, granted a man like
Henry VIII., he might turn them to his own ad-
vantage with but little fear of consequences disas-
trous to his own position. And while the events
we are now going to discuss resulted practically
from the system he represented, they, by the law-
less procedure characterising them, in their turn
reacted upon it, and made the Tudor despotism a
yet more potent weapon for evil in the hands of
unscrupulous men.
The trend of political and social events had of
recent years the effect of making monasteries in
general unpopular with those parties in the state
who looked to the king as the author of all their
prosperity. Though they evidently were not un-
popular with people at large, at any rate their great
wealth was tempting to the Crown. And there were
courtiers who said these were institutions which
might easily become strongholds of the pope's
authority.
144 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
Henry VIII. ascended the throne in 1509, and
for many years won golden opinions from his
subjects. If given, perhaps, rather too much to
pleasure and prodigality, these were, it was hoped,
but faults of a generous youth which, in time,
would give way to the staider and graver virtues
becoming a ruler. The minister upon whom he
relied in everything was Wolsey, archbishop of
York, chancellor of the realm, and cardinal of
the Eoman Church. This great man, who has
never had justice done to him1 (for great he was
in spite of many failings arising mainly from his
position and the corruption of the times), had arrived
at the height of his power. In temporal matters he
was practically supreme. " He is the person who
rules both the king and the entire kingdom," 2 says
a foreign ambassador. The cardinal wanted powers
as extensive in ecclesiastical matters. Perhaps, had
he had them at first, and had reached to the papacy
he was aspiring after, Wolsey might have come
down to all times as the pope who had initiated
the reform in head and members that for a century
had been asked. His principles were excellent ;
when he had a free hand and no ulterior aim in
view, we can see the lines he would have worked
on. But this by the way.
1 The way in which he spent the last months of his life in his own
diocese of York, showed that he possessed qualities which had never
had full play ; and if he had not been a great statesman he might
have been one of the greatest prelates of modern times.
2 Quoted by Dom Gasquet, vol. i. p. 68.
THE DOWNFALL 145
In due course, and after much pressure, Wolsey
did receive, as legate, powers perhaps more ample
than had ever been given. But he had already
committed himself to a policy which proved his
ruin, and therefore his legateship was not advan-
tageous to the Church. Unfortunately, he also
thereby accustomed the people to see vested in
the hands of one man, the supreme power both
in Church and State. It was not so difficult, then,
for them to acquiesce, later on, when Henry took
into his own hands the powers his minister had
wielded.
The cardinal wanted money. He had magni-
ficent tastes, and was a founder of colleges and
palaces. The pope had reluctantly given him ex-
tensive powers of visitation over certain smaller
monasteries, even with power to suppress such of
them as through fewness of numbers or poverty he
might judge to be useless. Their funds were to
be applied to the support of the colleges at Oxford
and Ipswich he was then founding. Much pressure
was used to force Clement VII. in 1524 to grant the
powers, and even then the pope made limitations.
Only such monasteries were to be suppressed as
were absolutely necessary, and only to the total
amount of 3000 ducats a year. The cardinal set to
work, and in spite of all difficulties suppressed thirty
monasteries in which the number had dwindled
down to some five or six, or even fewer members.
The visitors he employed to go round and inspect
vol. 1. k
146 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
the houses were Allen and Thomas Cromwell, the
latter of whom became so notorious. The visitors
had many complaints (only too well founded) made
about them ; but this was beyond the intention of
their master. Bribery and violence were the weapons
they mostly used ; and superiors of the threatened
houses were led to believe they might buy off sup-
pression by offering gifts to the cardinal's colleges.
How much of these gifts stopped in the hands of the
visitors it is impossible here to say. But Cromwell
turned out later on such an adept in the receipt of
bribes, that it is most likely he proved his powers
on this occasion.
When Wolsey was impeached, the complaints
made about the way in which the suppression of the
monasteries was effected by the cardinal's agents
were not forgotten. With his fall Henry lost the
only check upon the downward course. In the place
of the fallen cardinal was Thomas Cromwell, whose
appetite for suppression had been whetted. He had
seen practically how defenceless the monasteries
were, and how easy it would be for the omnipotent
Tudor monarch to make away with them on any
convenient plea that could be raised ; and also he
had found out that in the process plenty of ad-
vantages would accrue to himself. The king had
also cast his eyes on their wealth. And not cupidity
alone influenced him ; but he also saw in them
institutions which might easily become, even after
a final breach with Rome, means of keeping alive
THE DOWNFALL 147
the pope's authority, which he was now attacking
at its very foundation. Blood had already been
shed in its defence. Fisher and More, and the Car-
thusians had laid down their lives for the doctrine ;
and the people, restless and disheartened, were be-
ginning to give trouble. Taxation was heavy : but
the state of the country was such that it could
not be paid. Cromwell was afraid of exasperating
the people further by levying new taxes which
Parliament had lately granted to meet the require-
ments of the king, who was, as is clear from state
papers, at that moment reduced to great straits for
want of money.
The monasteries offered themselves as an ex-
pedient to the fertile brain of Cromwell for supply-
ing all these wants and remedying the complaints.
" In determining to strike a blow at the monastic
bodies, Cromwell had a twofold object, both of which
appealed to the king's present state of mind : to
overthrow the papal system in its principal strong-
holds, and to have the fingering of the riches with
which the piety of ten centuries had endowed them.
By the middle of the year 1334, commissioners were
busily journeying through England tendering in the
oath of supremacy to the religious. No special form
of oath had been presented by Parliament, so Crom-
well took advantage of the omission. He made
his agents tender to the monks a renunciation of
the papal supremacy and jurisdiction much more
stringent and explicit than that rejected by More
148 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
and Fisher, and already subscribed to by many of
the secular clergy. The commissioners appear to
have met with only partial success. The intolerable
nature of the oath demanded seems to suggest that
the intention of its framers was to drive the religious
to refuse, and thus to create a pretext for falling
upon and destroying their houses." 1
An obsequious Parliament had transferred, along
with other rights to the king from the pope, the
power of visitation over monasteries. A royal com-
mission was issued for the inspection of all religious
houses, with an ulterior view to the speedy sup-
pression of as many as possible. The chief men
employed were Legh and Layton, Ap Rice, London
and Bedyll, men whose names come down to pos-
terity noted with infamy.
"They were furnished with a set of eighty-six
articles of inquiry and with twenty-five injunctions,
to which they had power to add much at their dis-
cretion. The articles of inquiry were searching, the
injunctions minute and exacting. Framed in the
spirit of three centuries earlier, unworkable in
practice, and enforced by such agents, it is easy to
understand, even were there no written evidence
of the fact, that they were galling and unbearable
to the helpless inmates of the monasteries. . . . All
religious under twenty-four years of age, or who
had been professed under twenty, were to be dis-
missed from the religious life. Those who were
1 Gasquet, vol. i. pp. 247, 248.
THE DOWNFALL 149
left became practically prisoners in their monas-
teries. No one was allowed to leave the precincts
(which even in the larger monasteries were very
confined as to limit) or to visit there. In many
instances porters, who were in reality gaolers, were
appointed to see this impossible regulation was
kept. What was simply destruction of all discipline
and order in the monasteries was an injunction that
every religious, who wished to complain of anything
done by his superior or any of his brethren, was to
have the right of appeal to Cromwell. To facilitate
this, the superior was ordered to find any subject
the money and means for prosecuting any such
appeals in person if he so desired." 1
The object was clearly to drive the monks in
desperation to surrender their houses, and thus
save the king from the necessity of turning them
out of house and home. Another plan, in order to
give a colour to the project, was to see whether by
any possibility scandals, or even any suspicions of
scandal, might be found. The visitors, as is clear
from their own letters, were determined that scandals
should be found, and they scrupled not by threats
to extort, or to invent so-called confessions : nay,
even themselves to tempt to sin the helpless women
in their power.
Dom Gasquet has once for all vindicated the
memory of the monks and nuns of England at the
time of the dissolution, and with masterly hand
1 Gasquet, vol. i. pp. 255, 256.
ISO THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
analyses and shows the worthlessness of the royal
testimony upon which Parliament acted in decree-
ing the suppression of the lesser monasteries. Six
weeks only did these worthy styled commissioners
spend in visiting the monasteries and finding out
the state of religion. Short though the time was
for any real inquiry, it was enough for the end they
had in view. Their reports were sent in to Crom-
well in time for the opening of Parliament in
February 1536. These reports, the only evidence
that ever existed against the monasteries, are pre-
served to-day in the State Paper Office, and after a
careful examination Dom Gasquet says they are
utterly valueless as proofs of anything more than
" that these commissioners were ready to bring any
accusation against the monks, and that the fair
name of many, who possibly never heard anything
of the matter, was blackened by mere reckless
assertions." 1
Parliament met on the 4th February. The only
evidence laid before the nation, in the very words
of the preamble to the Act passed by a packed
House of Commons to legalise the suppression, was
the king's own assertion that the reports of the
commissioners were true, and his own testimony
that he had received credible information that
1 Layton, e.g., writes from York to Cromwell, January 13, 1536:
" This day we begin with St. Mary's, whereas we suppose to find much
evil disposition, both in the abbat and the convent, whereof, God will-
ing, I shall certify you in my next letter" (Three Chapters of Letters re-
lating to the Suppression of Monasteries (Camden Society), p. 97).
THE DOWNFALL 151
vicious living was rampant in the smaller monas-
teries. On the king's word alone, and, as far as
we know, without any further inquiry or even
examination of witnesses, Parliament prayed the
king to suppress and to take the property of such
monasteries as had an income under ^200 a year.
On the strength, too, of the royal word, Parliament
also publicly thanks God that in " divers and great
Solemn Monasteries of the realm, religion is right
well kept and observed."
It must also be noted that the Act does not give
the property of these monasteries absolutely to the
king, but only " in as ample a manner " as they were
possessed by their former owners ; that is, in trust for
God and the poor. It was by no means the inten-
tion to grant them for the purpose to which Henry
illegally afterwards applied them.
" It was ordered also that the king should provide
occupation and pensions for the monks not trans-
ferred to other monasteries. It was further enacted
that on the site of every dissolved religious house,
the new possessor would be bound under heavy
penalties to provide hospitality and service for the
poor, such as had been given them previously by the
religious foundations. By this provision not only is
the patrimony of the poor recognised as being seized
in the property of the monasteries, but a testimony
is afforded as to the way the religious had hitherto
discharged their obligations in this respect. The
neglect of these rights of the needy by those who
152 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
became possessed of the confiscated property is one
of the greatest blots on our national history. It
has caused the spoliation of monastery and convent
to be regarded as the rising of the rich against the
poor."1
To reconcile the people, Cromwell sent into the
country preachers "who went about to preach and
persuade the people that he could employ the
ecclesiastical revenues in hospitals, colleges, and
other foundations for the public good, which would
be a better use than that they should support lazy
and useless monks." 2
These preachers spread abroad also that the money
gained for these smaller monasteries would save the
nation from any future taxation. Taxation already
ground them down to an intolerable state ; and this
measure was held out to them as a promise of relief.
The prospect of a share in the spoils, it was hoped,
would quiet them, at least outwardly, for the time.
Moreover, distinct affirmations were made that the
king had no intention of touching the great houses.
It was only the iniquity which existed in the smaller
monasteries which forced so pious a prince to sup-
press them.
Having got legal colour for his work, the king
appointed a court, "the court of Augmentations," to
deal with the property of the monasteries. Surveyors
1 Gasquet, vol i. p. 311.
2 Marillacy the French ambassador. Inventaire Analytique de
Archives, ed. Kanleck, No. 242.
THE DOWNFALL 153
were promptly selected to go round and, aided by
the local gentry, decide which monasteries came
under the limit of ^200 a year.1 The surveyors
were instructed to make inventories of all plate,
jewels, and other goods and property, to take pos-
session of all deeds and muniments, and also of the
convent seal. They were to lay a charge on the
superior to take care of the king's property until
he was released. The rest of the community were
dismissed ; to other monasteries if they could find
admission ; or, if not, they were, with " some reason-
able reward," sent adrift in the world.2
"The system was the same in all cases, and the
history of one dissolution is that of all. What the
arrival of the six royal commissioners with their
retinue of servants at monastery and convent must
have been to the inmates can be well imagined. The
Act of dissolution, it is true, had saved them from
the necessity, to which many of their more power-
ful brethren were constrained, of surrender. Their
houses, which pious benefactors had built genera-
1 Whenever the local gentry, who would naturally know more of the
reputation of any convent than the Government surveyor, pleaded for
the preservation of a house and bore witness " that religion was right
well observed," they made no impression upon Cromwell.
2 What the effect of all these misdeeds was on a foreigner we see
from a letter written July 8, 1536, by Chapuys, who says: "It is a
lamentable thing to see a legion of monks and nuns, who have been
chased from their monasteries, wandering miserably hither and thither
seeking means to live ; and several honest men have told me that what
with monks, nuns, and persons dependent on the monasteries sup-
pressed, there were over 20,000 who knew not how to live " (Calendar
S.P. Hen. VIII. , vol. xi. No. 42).
154 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
tions before, and in which, for centuries, men and
women of their order had served God and aided
their neighbours, were passing away from them for
ever; and the demand for and defacing of their
convent seal was the ending of their corporate life.
Henceforth they were to pass the remainder of their
days as strangers in a larger house, or as wandering
in a world which many had left years before, and to
which they could never belong. The desecration of
their churches, in which they and their forefathers in
religion before them had gathered by night and by
day for the service of God ; the seizure for the king's
use of their altar plate, in itself so often poor, to
them always precious by the association of the past ;
the rude appraising of their bells and the lead which
covered the roofs over their heads ; the hurried sales of
the mean furniture of their cells, and of the contents
of church, cloister, and frater, were all so many heart-
rending evidences of the passing away of all that for
which most of the monks and nuns really cared." 1
The work began in April 1536, and took some
time to complete. According to Stowe, there were
376 houses dealt with, and the value of their lands
alone was some ^3 2,000 and more a year. Of their
personal goods more than ;£ 100,000 was dealt with,
and the same authority considers that " 10,000
people, masters and servants, had lost their livings
by the pulling down of their houses at that time."
Henry made some exceptions. Fifty-two houses
1 Gasquet, vol. ii. pp. 13, 14.
THE DOWNFALL 155
gained a respite, bought of course at an enormous
price, sometimes three times their annual income.
Dom Gasquet points out that several of the houses
there re-established were among the number of
those gravely defamed by Layton and Legh, the
prime managers of the visitation of 1535-36; and
in more than one case a superior incriminated by
them was reappointed on the new foundation.1 In
the course of the next year (1537) Henry actually
founded one or two monasteries, one of nuns at
Stixfold, to be called " the new monastery of King
Henry VIII. ," and an abbey of black monks at
Bisham to pray for the king and Queen Jane. The
king also granted to the abbat (but lately abbat of
Chertsey, one of the suppressed houses) his royal
licence to wear a mitre like any other abbat of that
order, with large possessions in England. But this
was not to last long.2
It is not our purpose to do more than refer to
the popular risings on behalf of the monasteries
in Lincolnshire in the autumn of 1536, nor of the
Pilgrimage of Grace and other subsequent move-
ments. They excited Henry's bitterest feelings
against the helpless monks whom he falsely accused
of fomenting them. They were the occasion of the
wholesale destruction of the monastic orders. He
wrote to the Duke of Norfolk, who was charged to
put down the rebels : —
1 Gasquet, vol. ii. p. 21. 2 Ibid. p. 33.
156 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
" Our pleasure is that before you close up our
banners again you shall cause such dreadful execu-
tion to be done upon a good number of the inhabi-
tants of every town, village, and hamlet that have
offended us, there may be a fearful spectacle to all
others hereafter that would practise any like matter.
. . . Finally, forasmuch as all these troubles have
ensued by the solicitation and traitorous conspiracies
of the monks and canons of these parts, we desire
you, at such places as they have conspired and kept
their houses with force save the appointment at
Doncaster, you shall without pity or circumstance
cause all the monks and canons that be in any
way faulty, to be tied up without further delay or
ceremony." 1
Thus by force and blood all opposition was
quelled ; although the risings served as a temporary
check upon the king's schemes for further suppres-
sions. But a new expedient was found for getting
hold of some of the larger monasteries which had
hitherto escaped. This was by the attainder of
such abbats as could be charged with high treason.
Hitherto the penalties of attainder affected indi-
viduals, but not corporations. But Henry gave a
new interpretation to the law, and took advantage
of a clause slipped into the recent act, which put
the whole abbey into the power of the king on the
conviction of the abbat of high treason. Many of
the cistercian, ckmiac, and austin houses came into
1 Blunt's History of the Reformation, p. 365.
THE DOWNFALL 157
the king's hands this way soon after the Northern
risings. But there was the way of surrender also
to be made use of, to give the king legal posses-
sion, ''and every pressure was brought to bear upon
the monks and nuns to induce them to resign their
charges into Henrys hands ; " 1 promises of pension
to those who willingly consented, and threats of
being turned out in utter destitution to those who
refused.
Of forty convents of women that survived the
first dissolution, thirty-three are on the rolls as
having surrendered. But an inspection of the ori-
ginal papers, says Dom Gasquet, shows that in
twenty-eight of the thirty-three cases the nuns never
signed at all. Of the others, one (Shaftesbury) is
signed by the abbess alone ; another (Tarant) has
twenty signatures, all in the same handwriting.
The number of nuns turned adrift seems to have
been 1560, more than one half of whom were bene-
dictine dames.2
The commissioners were instructed, as we have
seen, to try by every means to get a willing sur-
render. But at any rate they were to get possession
of every house. This all the time, be it remembered,
without any sanction from Parliament. Between
1538 and 1540, fifty-four monasteries of black monks,
1 Gasquet, vol. ii. p. 225.
2 Ibid. ii. pp. 228, 237. Before the dissolution there were eighty-
four benedictine houses for women, and only twelve of them were
worth more than the ^200 limit settled by Parliament.
158 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
1300 in number, were cajoled or forced into sur-
rendering their property. Besides, under various
pretences Henry had deposed many superiors who
proved too staunch to the oath taken when elected,
and put in their stead creatures of his own to make
the surrender when called upou. Three of the
abbats, those of Glaston, Eeading, and Colchester,
condemned as it seems without trial even, were
declared guilty of high treason and were hanged,
drawn, and quartered on the spot in which they had
ruled with honour for many years. Nothing stopped
the king, neither pity nor reverence ; and he rested
not until not one house was left of all the monastic
glories of England. It is not our purpose here to
go into details of these surrenders ; but a tale could
be told as bitter and as heartrending as any known.
It is just the bare facts of the dissolution and the
way it was brought about that we have wished to
set down here,1 and we will end this chapter by
words, written indeed of St. Peter's, Gloucester,
but which may be applied to any case : —
" Having existed for more than eight hundred
years under different forms, in poverty and in
wealth, in meanness and in magnificence, in misfor-
tune and in success, it finally succumbs to the royal
will ; the day came, and that a drear winter day,
when its last mass was sung, its last censer waved,
its last congregation bent in rapt and lovely adora-
1 W. H. Hart's Introduction, vol. iii. pp. xlix., 1., Hist, et Cart. Mora.
S. Petri Glouces. (Roll Series).
THE DOWNFALL 159
tion before the altar there, and doubtless as the last
tones of that day's evensong died away in the
vaulted roof, there were not wanting those who
lingered in the solemn stillness of the old massive
pile, and who, as the lights disappeared one by one,
felt that for them there was now a void which
could never be filled, because their old abbey with
its beautiful services, its frequent means of grace,
its hospitality to strangers and its loving care for
God's poor, had passed away like an early morning
dream, and was gone for ever."
CHAPTER IX
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT
The monasteries were destroyed and the inhabi-
tants dispersed. Many of those who received
pensions1 were as soon as possible promoted to
livings ; for then their pensions ceased. Others
there were who sold their pensions for a few years'
purchase, so sore was their need ; and then, their
money exhausted, went finally to swell the ever-
growing crowd of beggars who after the suppression
were daily becoming a most serious and dangerous
element in society. Others, again, could not go to
London to receive their money ; for it was at first
in the capital only that such pensions were paid.
Some of these allowed their pensions to lapse ;
others had to employ agents who, at an enormous
percentage, collected the money due.2 The monas-
tic colleges at the universities, particularly those of
Gloucester, Durham, and Canterbury, were crowded
with monks who retired there to continue their
1 Only the superiors of houses under ^200 income were granted
pensions.
2 The pensions were taxed sometimes to the extent of one fourth as
"a loan" to the king. Cf. Gasquet, vol. ii. pp. 463-466.
160
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT 161
studies and find a retreat from the world.1 Among
these was a young monk of Evesham, John (Baptist)
Fecknam, whose name became illustrious as the
last abbat of Westminster, and one of the con-
fessors of the faith in the days of queen Elizabeth.
As he was the restorer of the black monks, though
but for a short while, and through him comes the link
which binds the English benedictine of to-day to
St. Augustine and his companions, we will sketch
his life from the few details we have been able to
gather. He will serve as an example both of what
the dispossessed monks had to suffer and the manner
of men they were.
John (Baptist) Fecknam was born in the dis-
trict of Feckenham or Fecknam in Worcestershire,
whence the name by which he is known to history.
His family name was Howman, and his parents,
Humphrey and Florence Howman, seem to have
been of the yeoman class and fairly well off.2 He
was born about 15 15, or perhaps earlier,3 a few
1 Wood's Oxford, p. xxiv., note.
2 They left a bequest of xls. to the poor of Solihull during the
rectorship of their son. See an old vellum book " containing the chari-
table alms given by way of love to the parishoners of Solihull, with
the order of distribution thereof, begun by Master John Howman alias
Fecknam, priest and doctor of divinity, late parson of Solihull afore-
said, in the year of our Lord mdxlviii.55 This manuscript is pre-
served among the parish records of Solihull, and is quoted by Miss
E. T. Bradley in her Memorials of Westminster Abbey, p. 163.
3 It is said that Fecknam was about sixty at the time of his imprison-
ment with the bishop of Ely in 1579. If "about sixty" is to be taken
literally, his age at the chief events of his life would be as follows :
born about 15 19, he would be twenty-one at the date of the suppres-
VOL. I. L
i62 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
years after Henry VIII. 's accession, and received the
first elements of his education from the parish priest.
As Evesham was the nearest abbey, it is most likely
that he was taken into the claustral school at
an early age, and in due course became a monk.
The first definite statement we find is, that in his
eighteenth year he was sent to the benedictine
establishment at Oxford, Gloucester Hall.1 But
whether this was before he became a monk is not
certain. From the fact that a monk was not allowed
to be professed till he was twenty,2 it seems clearly
evident, if he entered the university at eighteen, that
he was not then in the habit ; for one can hardly
suppose that a mere novice would be sent to Oxford.
It is much more probable that he really went as
a benedictine student3 to Gloucester Hall to take
sion of Evesham ; thirty at his first imprisonment ; dean of St. Paul's at
thirty-five ; abbat of Westminster, thirty-seven ; second imprisonment,
forty-one ; at Ely, sixty ; and died at Wisbeach, sixty-six. But these do
not seem probable. He took his B.D. June 1 1, 1 539. He would already
have been at Oxford three years, and it is morally certain he could not
have gone there for his divinity degree (which presupposes that of Arts)
before his twentieth year at least. We are inclined to put his birth
certainly not later than 1 5 1 5, making him, at least, seventy when he died.
1 A. Wood, Athenai Oxoniensis, ed. Bliss, vol. i. p. 507. " There is no
doubt," says the Rev. Henry Anstey, " that the boys, as a rule, resorted
to the university at a very early age, earlier, probably, than is usually
supposed ; and yet there appears to have been no statutable limit as to
age, so that it may be assumed as certain that, while the majority would
go from the age of ten to twelve years (i.e. supposing them to commence
their education at Oxford, of which more will be said shortly), there
would be found also a large number of more mature age " (Introduction
to Munimenta Academica (Roll Series), Part I. p. lvii.).
2 See page 89 ante.
3 " Every religious house had, it would appear, its own schools, in
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT 163
his degree in arts, and that after the course, generally
three years, he returned to Evesham and took the
habit and was professed.1 That he probably returned
to Oxford after profession seems certain ; for, says
Anthony a Wood, "I find him there in 1537, in
which year he subscribed, by the name of John
Feckenham, to a certain composition then made
between Rob. Joseph, prior of the said college, and
twenty-nine students thereof on one part (of which
number Feckenham was one of the senior), and three
of the senior beadles of the university on the other." 2
It must have been shortly after June 1539 that he
returned to Evesham, where he was set to teach the
junior monks, and was perhaps engaged in this
work when the suppression came. For this much
we know, that in October 1538 he supplicated for
which its members performed all their academical exercises previous to
inception. . . . Each such religious house had a school for every purpose,
grammar as well as the higher faculties, to a great extent independent
of^the university, and yet a part of it, and subject to its general regula-
tions and partaking of its privileges" (Munimenta Academica, p. lxii.).
1 In the life of Eichard of Wallingford, abbat of St. Albans, we
get a similar picture, which throws light on the subject. "When
hardly ten years old he lost his father, and soon after was, on account
of his docility and promise, adopted as a son by William of Kirkby,
prior of Wallingford, of good memory. Helped by his alms, he learnt
grammar and philosophy at Oxford for about six years, and taking
his degree in arts, according to the custom, in the twentieth year of
his age he bade adieu to the world, and devoutly received the monastic
habit in this monastery of St. Albans. After having been exercised
for three years in the religious life, he was then sent to Oxford for
the study of letters . . . where he spent nine whole years in philosophy
and theology ... so that he was promoted to read the sentences"
(Gesta Abbatum (Roll Series), vol. ii. p. 182).
2 Athence Oxoniensis, ed. Bliss, vol. i. p. 507.
i64 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
the degree of Bachelor of Divinity, and took it
June ii, 1539.1
Clement Lichfield, whose noble gateway is the
only vestige left of the great monastery of Evesham,
had been his first abbat. What sort of man he was
appears from the report of the royal commissioners,
who say he was " chaste in his living and to right
well overlook the reparations of his house " ; in other
words, a good monk and a good administrator. The
reformer, Latimer, who was bishop of the diocese,
calls him a " bloody abbat," the evident animus and
certain vagueness of which may be taken as praise.
There was no chance of getting such a man to sur-
render his abbey, so the only thing was to force
him to resign his charge and to place in his stead
a more pliable man. From a letter of March 17,
1538, written to Cromwell by William Petre, the
commissioner, we see how it was done.
"According to your commandment I have been
at Evesham, and there received the resignation of
the abbat, which he was contented to make imme-
diately upon the sight of your lordship's letters,
saving that he desired me very instantly that I would
not open the same during the time of my being
here, because, as he said, it would be noted that
he was compelled to resign for fear of deprivation." 2
The abbat bowed to force majeure and left his
monastery. He was promptly succeeded by Philip
1 Boase, Register of the University of Oxford, vol. i. p. 192.
2 T. Wright, Three Chapters of Letters (Camden Soc), p. 177.
JOHN FECKNAM, ABB AT 165
Harford, " a true friend," 1 who surrendered 2 the
abbey to the king on January 27, 1540, and was
rewarded with a pension of ^240 a year,3 which he
lost when he was made dean of Worcester on the
suppression of that monastic chapter. On the
pension-list appears the name of John Fecknam,
with a pension of 15 marks (^10) per annum. As
the general pension for the younger monks was 10
marks, Fecknam was doubtlessly awarded the larger
sum on account of his university degree. He went
back to Gloucester Hall to continue his studies,
but not for long, for the bishop of Worcester, John
Bell, inviting him to become his chaplain, he
entered his service until the bishop resigned in
1543.4 He afterwards joined Edmund Bonner, the
bishop of London; and stayed with him till 1549,
when he was committed a prisoner to the Tower of
London. It must have been while living in London
that Fecknam received the living of Solihull, and
1 Latimer to Cromwell. R. 0. Crum. Corr. XLIX., 42, quoted by
D. Gasquet, vol. ii. p. 310.
2 Dom Gasquet points out that there is no deed of surrender and no
enrolment on the Close Roll (vol. ii. p. 310).
3 Clement Lichfield had paid ^160 to the king for the restoration
of his temporalities, and besides had to make heavy loans both to the
king and to the cardinal. For a whole year he had to put up twenty-
four of the royal household and provide for them and their horses.
But in sjDite of these drains on his purse he did not forget the house
of God. He added to the decoration of the choir and built chantries
in the parish churches of All Saints and St. Lawrence, in one of which
he lies buried. The memory of the " good abbat " remained for a long
time cherished by Evesham and its inhabitants.
4 The Apostolatus, i. p. 233, which on the whole is first-rate authority,
is wrong here in giving the date of 1539 (Dugdale, vol. i. p. 578).
166 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
began to develop those oratorical powers for which
he became famous. His keen intellect made him
a formidable opponent in controversy with the re-
forming party ; and it was most likely some public
utterance of his that led to his first imprisonment.
This was the time when the new Liturgy of the
Book of Common Prayer was being forced upon
the country under heavy penalties. Home, later
on the protestant bishop of Winchester, used to
say that Fecknam was sent to the Tower because
he first promised and then refused to receive the
Sacrament after the new fashion. But Stapleton,
in the Counterblast to M. Homes t vayne blaste
against M. Fekenham,1 says, " The cause of his
imprisonment then, as I understand by such as
well knoweth the whole matter, was not about the
ministration of the Sacraments, but touching the
matter of Justification by only faith and the fast
of Lent ; like as it doth appear in the archbishop
of Canterbury's records, he being therefore, in a
solemn session holden at Lambeth Hall, convented
before M. Cranmer, then archbishop of Canter-
1 This book was really written by Nicholas Harpsfield, sometime
archdeacon of Canterbury, and a prisoner in the Tower from 1559 to
1575. Being himself a prisoner, it was not considered wise to bring
out the book under his own name. But the fact that he was a fellow-
prisoner with Fecknam at the very time he wrote, makes the bio-
graphical part of an unimpeachable authority. It was written about
the year 1567-68, for the author says : " And God grant that Fecknam,
after seven years' imprisonment, may find so much humanity and
favour as he showed to others when he was in his prosperity." See
Steven's A ddition to the Monasticori, vol. i. p. 89.
JOHN FECKNAM, ABB AT 167
bury, and other commissioners appointed for that
matter. By the examination of the which records
you shall be convinced of your untruth and error
therein, as in all the rest, I doubt not, by God's
help."1
While in prison, Sir Philip Hobbs, who had be-
come the owner by purchase of the abbey lands at
Evesham, remembered that the monk of Evesham,
for whom his estate was charged a pension, and
the famous disputant on the Catholic side were
identical. So, to use Fecknam's own words, he was
" borrowed out of prison " to hold disputations with
the new men. " But the very intent of the borrow-
ing of M. Fecknam for a time out of the Tower,
like as he said himself, was that he should dispute
reason, and have conference with certain learned
men touching matters of religion then in contro-
versies 2 At seven of those exhibitions did he take
part. Such disputations were in much favour in
those days, and Fecknam was destined to have
frequent experience of them. The first was in the
house of the Earl of Bedford in the Savoy ; the next
at Westminster, in the house of Sir William Cecil,
afterwards the famous secretary of state ; 3 and the
third at White Friars, in the house of Sir John
Cheke, the Greek scholar, and the young king's
tutor. Fecknam was then taken down to the dio-
cese of Worcester, in which he was still a bene-
ficed clergyman, and had to appear with Hooper as
1 p. 36. 2 Ibid, p. 4. 3 Ibid, p. 36.
1 68 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
his opponent in four disputations. For though he
had been imprisoned in the Tower he had not been
deprived of the living of Solihull, to which he had
been appointed in 1 544. The first of these disputa-
tions was at Pershore, where Hooper was on visita-
tion ; * the last in the cathedral church, when he had
as opponent, among others, John Jewel, afterwards
the bishop of Salisbury.2
The disputations over, in which Fecknam, if he
failed to change the mind of his opponents, certainly
gave proof of his native charity and moderation,
he was again relegated to the Tower. There he
remained till Tuesday, September 5, 1553, when,
with the rest of the prisoners for conscience' sake
whom the new queen claimed as her own, he was
released. By Sunday the 24th of that same month
he was back in the pulpit again. According to
Machyn, " the xxiiii day of September did preach
master doctor Fecknam at Paul's Cross, the Sun-
day afore the queen's coronation." 3 He returned
to Bonner as chaplain, and was made a preben-
dary of St. Paul's 1554. Preferment came to him
rapidly. Nominated rector of Finchley on June 10,
on September 23 he was transferred to the better
living of Greenford Magna, and now resigned the
1 Stapleton says : " The said M. Hooper was so answered by M.
Fecknam that there was good cause why he should be satisfied, and
M. Fecknam dismissed from his trouble" (p. 37).
2 Ibid. Stapleton's account is the source of the account given in the
Apostolatus, i. p. 234.
3 Machyn's Diary, p. 44.
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT 169
living of Solihull. Meanwhile the queen made
him one of her chaplains and her confessor, and he
had received the appointment of dean of St. Paul's
on March 10 of that same year. The date of his
installation does not appear ; but he preached at
the Cross as dean in the following November 25.1
But his talents as a disputant were also called into
requisition. In the April he was down at Oxford
disputing with much charity and mildness against
Cranmer, Latimer, and Ridley. John Fecknam
had no sympathy with the ferocious measures that
were being enforced against the innovators, nor
in the application to them of the already existing
laws. He did not believe in making men Catholics
1 Ibid. Fecknam seems to have been the popular preacher of his day
and a great favourite with Machyn, who mentions him as preaching
twice on November 5, 1553 — once at St. Stephen's, Walbrook, and
once at St. Mary's, Overy ; he was again at Walbrook on the 19th,
where he "made the goodliest sermon that was ever heard of the
blessed sacrament of the Body and Blood for to be after the consecra-
tion" (p. 48). One of his sermons, in November 1554, seems to have
given offence to the Council, for in the Acts of the Privy Council of
England, new series (vol. v. p. 35), we read: "At Westminster, the
xxix of November 1554, Mr. Fekenham, dean of Paul's, being com-
manded by the Lords this day to make his appearance before them,
did accordingly appear and exhibited the same day the sermon he
made at Paul's on Sunday last in writing, which he was also com-
manded to bring with him." This sermon, Machyn says (p. 76), was
" a godly sermon." It probably was one recommending mild measures
with those opposed to the Catholic Church. Later on, as abbat, we
find him on June 20, 1557, preaching at Paul's Cross, where he occupied
the pulpit again on November 21, and on the following March 6 ; in
his own abbey church on April 5 and on August 4, at the requiem
mass held for one of the two widows Henry VIII. left behind him to
lament his loss.
170 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
by force ; and if he had to take part in the disputa-
tions then in fashion, it was from a sincere desire
to prove the truth to the unhappy prisoners and re-
concile them to the church they had deserted. Nor
did he neglect to use his influence on their behalf ;
for, as Fuller says, "He was very gracious with the
queen, and effectually laid out all his interest with
her (sometimes even to offend her, but never to
injure her) to procure pardon of the faults, or mitiga-
tion of the punishment for poor protestants.1 The
earls of Bedford and Leicester received great kind-
ness from him ; and his old friend, Sir John Cheke,
owed his life to Fecknam's personal interest with
the queen. He took up the cause of the unfortu-
nate Lady Jane Dudley, and remonstrated with the
queen and Gardiner upon the policy of putting her
to death. He visited the poor young girl in prison ;
and though unsuccessful in removing the prejudices
of her early education, he was able to help her to
accept with resignation the fate that awaited her.
Neither did he forsake the hapless lady until she
paid by death the penalty of her father-in-law's
treason and her own share therein (1554). When
the princess Elizabeth was sent to the Tower (March
18, 1554) for her supposed part in Sir Thomas
Wyatt's rebellion (on account of the proposed
Spanish match), Fecknam, just then elected dean,
interceded so earnestly for her release that Mary,
who was convinced of her sister's guilt or at any
1 Worthies of England, ed. 1811, vol. ii. p. 477.
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT 171
rate of her insincerity, showed for some time her
displeasure with him. But Elizabeth's life was
spared ; and she was released mainly by his impor-
tunity, after two months' imprisonment.1
In her proposed restoration of the Catholic Church
to its former state, Mary found zealous helpers, not
only in Fecknam, but in other benedictines. Bishop
Thornton, once a monk of Christ Church, Canterbury,
suffragan to the archbishop, was the first to restore
the mass in that cathedral. Six benedictine bishops
altogether took part in the revival.2 But the queen's
1 Fuller, The Church History of Britain, vol. v. p. 95 (ed. Oxford).
Later on, when abbat, Machyn tells us that in 1557, on " the xii day of
November, there was a post set up in Smithfield for three that should
have been burnt, butt (?) both wood and coal ; and my lord abbat of
Westminster came to Newgate and talked with them and so they were
stayed for that day of burning" (p. 157).
2 Of these benedictine bishops, Wharton, abbat of Bermondsey, was
made bishop of Hereford March 17, 1554; John Holyman, a monk
of Beading, was made bishop of Bristol November 1 8 in the same year.
Four others, Salcot of Salisbury, Chambers of Peterborough, the above-
mentioned Thornton of Dover, and Kitchin of Landaff, had fallen
into schism but were reconciled by Pole and reinstated in their sees.
Chambers died in 1556, Thornton and Salcot in 1557, Wharton and
Holyman in 1558. Anthony Kitchin, whose name in religion was
Dunstan, had been a monk of Westminster and became prior of
Gloucester Hall, and abbat of Eynsham in 1536. He acknowledged the
king's supremacy August 10, 1534, and surrendered his abbey to the
king December 4, 1538. He received a pension of ^133, 6s. 8d., and
became one of the king's chaplains ; was elected bishop of Llandaff
March 26, 1545, and consecrated the following May. He was unfor-
tunately the only one of the Catholic prelates who fell away under
Elizabeth, and so kept possession of his see, of which in after years he
was called " the Calamity." But there were certain lengths he would
not go to ; he absolutely refused to have anything to do with the
foundation of the Anglican Succession. He died, aged ninety, on
October 31, 1565.
172 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
wish was to restore to the monks some at least of
their houses.
And here we are able, from the Venetian State
Papers of the period, to trace the steps of the
restoration of Westminster abbey. On March 19,
1555, the Venetian ambassador, Giovanni Michiel,
writes to the doge and senate : —
" The queen is intent on its augmentation (the
Church) and diffusion here, having sent for many
English friars of the orders of St. Dominic and St.
Francis, who, to escape the past persecutions, with-
drew beyond the seas and lived in poverty in
Flanders, in order to give them monasteries and the
means of subsistence ; and they, showing themselves
in public everywhere, are tolerably well received and
kindly treated. Sixteen benedictine monks have
also resumed the habit and returned to the order
spontaneously, although they were able to live and
had lived out of it much at ease and liberty, there
being included among them the dean of St. Paul's
(Fecknam), who has a wealthy revenue of well-nigh
2000 (?) ; notwithstanding which they have re-
nounced all their temporal possessions and conveni-
ences, and press for readmission into one of their
monasteries. The entire sixteen last week appeared
in their habits before the queen, who from joy,
immediately on seeing them, could not refrain from
shedding tears ; and for [the adjustment of] this
matter she has appointed six of the leading mem-
bers of the council, including the chancellor, the
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT 173
treasurer, the comptroller, and secretary Petre, so
that, together with the legate, they may according
to their judgment decide what is most fitting and
beneficial for the realm, both about these monas-
teries and all the Church property in possession of
the Crown. Her Majesty wishes it to be entirely
restored to those who were deprived of it, should
any of the original possessors be alive." 1
Already we see that as early, then, as March 1555
some benedictines, with Fecknam, had resumed their
habit, although as yet they had no house. The queen
had some difficulty in getting her husband to consent
to her project of a bill passed to allow her to give
back such abbey lands as were vested in the Crown ;
for by this she was giving up an income of some
,£60,000 a year. Parliament, after considerable
opposition, did pass in the following October a bill
legalising the renunciation. But there was the
secular chapter at Westminster to be removed, and
they were not willing to go. Promotion was given
to the dean, and the interests of the others were
duly looked after.2 Pole also had to make his
arrangements. Himself the protector of the Cas-
sinese benedictine congregation, he was determined
that the home at Westminster should be refounded
on the Italian model. Fearing commendam, he de-
1 Calendar of Venetian State Papers, vol. vi. No. 32.
2 There is a bond for ^30 between the abbat and a Spanish canon,
by which the abbat, "as well as any other person to whom the said
monastery should come," is bound to pay. See Bradley's Illustrations
of Westminster Abbey, p. 163.
174 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
cided that the abbat was to be appointed only for
three years, no conge oVelire was to be required for
his election, neither was the royal confirmation to be
sought for. Pole sent for monks from Italy, whom
he intended to introduce the more rigid discipline
of the continental houses, and took advantage of
two " father visitors " the Cassinese had sent into
Spain, for purposes of their own, to ask that they
might come on to England. Pole writes to the
president of the Cassinese congregation under date
of February (1556?) that he was anxiously expect-
ing the arrival from Spain of the " father visitors,"
as he hoped they would render good service for the
restoration of the monastery which is about to be
effected.1
The royal consent to the restoration was given
in a deed signed by Philip and Mary at Croydon
on September 7, 1656, and Fecknam was appointed
abbat. Not only was he the most prominent man
of his order then in England, but his praise was in
every one's mouth. In another letter, written by
the Venetian ambassador on September 28, 1556,
he says : —
"The queen, thank God, continues in her good
plight, rejoicing to see the monks of St. Benet return
to their old abbey of Westminster, into which the
canons having been removed, they in God's name
will make their entry to-morrow — and this will be
the third monastery and order of regulars, besides
1 Gal. V.S.P., vol. vi. No. 403.
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT 175
one of nuns, which has hitherto been re-established,
to whom will soon be added the fourth of the
Carthusians [at Sheen], who have already made their
appearance." *
Once more, then, in possession by the end of
September 1556, the house had to be got into
order and some restorations made before the monks
could enter. Dean Stanley says " the great refec-
tory was pulled down," and "the smaller dormitory
was cleared away," and other conventual buildings
either destroyed or adapted to other uses.2 To make
all straight would necessarily take time ; and it was
not till 2 1st November that they began their regular
life. Machyn in his quaint style relates the event.
"The same day (21st of November) was the new
abbat of Westminster put in, Doctor Fecknam, late
dean of Paul's, and xiv more monks sworn in. And
the morrow after, the lord abbat with his convent
went a procession after the old fashion, in their
monks' weeds, in cowls of black saye, with his
vergers carrying his silver-rod in their hands ; at
evensong time the vergers went through the cloisters
to the abbat, and so went into the church afore the
high altar, and there my lord kneeled down and his
convent ; and after his prayer was made was brought
into the choir with the vergers, and so into his
1 Gal. V.S.P., vol. vi. No. 634. The dominicans were refounded
at Smithfield, the franciscans at Greenwich, the bridgettines at Syon
House, the carthusians at Sheen, the hospitallers at Clerkenwell, and a
hospital at the Savoy.
2 Historical Memorials of Westminster Abbey, fifth edition, p. 398.
176 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
place, and presently he began evensong xxii day of
the same month that was St. Clement's Even last." *
Michel in his account mentions " as many as
sixteen 2 having taken the habit on that day, it was
a very beautiful sight most agreeable to those who
witnessed it." 3
A few days after, the abbat was installed amidst
a large assemblage of the English Church.
" On the 29th day, at Westminster abbey, was the
lord abbat stalled and did wear a mitre. The lord
cardinal was there and many bishops, and the lord
treasurer and a great company. The lord chancellor
sang mass, and the abbat made the sermon." 4
Fecknam had lost no time in setting his house
in order, in receiving others to the habit,5 and in
vindicating the privileges belonging to his venerable
church. On the feast of St. Nicholas (December 6)
our gossiping diarist tells us : —
"The abbat went on procession with his convent ;
1 Machyn's Diary (Camden Society), pp. n 8, 119. A date always
celebrated by English benedictines as the Dies memorabilis, on account
of the many important events which have taken place on this date.
2 There seems to be some mistake about the number. Writing a few
days after (December 1), he says : "Yesterday ... the twenty-six
monks and their abbat made a fine show and procession." The com-
munity seem to have numbered in reality some twenty-eight.
3 Gal. V.S.P.y vol. vi. No. 723.
4 Machyn, pp. 119, 120.
5 Owing to the present difficulty of obtaining access to the West-
minster abbey records, it is not possible to identify all the monks of
Westminster. But the principal interest centres round D. Sigebert
Buckley, who passed on the benedictine succession nearly fifty years
afterwards.
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT 177
before him went all the sanctuary men with cross
keys on their garments ; and after went three for
murder ; one was the Lord Dacre, son of the North,
who was whipt with a sheet about [him for] killing
of one Master West, squire, dwelling beside . . ."
Another finding shelter was one of the abbey boys
— " a boy [that] killed a big boy that sold papers
and printed books, [with] hurling of a stone, and
hit him under the ear in Westminster Hall ; the
boy was one of the children that was [at the] school
there in the abbey ; the boy is a hosier's son above
London stone." l
The queen was not long in paying the monks
a visit. Giovanni Michiel writes, December 21,
1556:—
" Yesterday, St. Thomas' eve, the queen, before
her departure for Greenwich, which will take place
to-morrow, chose to see the benedictine monks in
their habits in the abbey of Westminster, whither
she went to vespers, being received in state by them
and their abbat, twenty-eight in number, all men of
mature age, the youngest being upwards of forty,
and all endowed with learning and piety, as proved
by their renunciation of the many conveniences of
life ; the poorest having a fixed annual rental of
500 crowns, besides ready money, and some 1500,
besides the abbat, who had upwards of [2000?],
and was dean of St. Paul's, which after that of
the bishops is the chief dignity of the English
1 Ibid. p. 121.
VOL. I. M
178 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
clergy. Words cannot express how much this re-
joiced the legate, who is already preparing another
monastery for the regular canons who are coming
shortly."1
Besides his duties as abbat and constantly preach-
ing, we find him giving time and money to beauti-
fying his church. On January 5, 1557, he began to
set up St. Edward's shrine again and the altar with
divers jewels that the queen sent hither.2 While on
the following 20th of March, says Machyn : —
" The xx of March was taken up at Westminster
again with a hundred lights, King Edward the Con-
fessor in the same place where his shrine was, and
it shall be set up again as fast as my lord abbat
can have it done, for it was a godly sight to have
seen it how reverently he was carried from the place
that he was taken up, where he was laid when that
abbey was spoiled and robbed, and so he was carried
and goodly singing and censing as has been seen, and
mass sung." 3
Machyn dearly loved a function.
Fecknam was a lover of the old customs, and did
not forget the benedictine spirit of hospitality. One
more extract from Machyn must be allowed, for the
sake of the glimpse it gives of the geniality of his
1 Cat. V.S.P., vol. vi. p. 2, No. 771. Priuli writes to Beccatello,
December 15, 1556, in the same strain, and gives the same number.
According to him they were "tutte persone benissimo qualificate
di dottrina e di gran pieta." See the letter in Tierney, vol. ii.
p. ccxxiii.
2 Bradley, p. 166. 3 P. 130.
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT 179
rule. On March 21, 1558, the feast of St. Benedict,
was held the traditional festivity connected with
the making of the gigantic paschal candle for
the approaching Easter. " xxi day of March was
paschal for the abbey of Westminster, made there
the weight of 300 lbs. of wax : and there was the
master and the wardens of the wax-chandlers with
twenty more at the making, and after, a great
dinner." x Evidently the head of the trade-gild of
chandlers took a representative part in the day's
doings, and shared, too, in the great dinner. There
is a touch of fellowship between the abbey and the
gild which tells of the good feeling of earlier days,
and which the "great dinner" would, no doubt,
more anglico, help to knit up again, if not increase.
Fecknam, while thus fulfilling the duties of his
high charge, had also to attend Parliament as a
mitred abbat of the realm. The rights of sanctuary
at his abbey were being questioned, and the Speaker
of the House of Commons called on the abbat to
produce the proofs of the privilege. " Accordingly
on Saturday the nth of February [1557] came the
abbat, accompanied with no council learned, but
only with one monk attending on him, bearing
two old muniments — the one whereof was the charter
of sanctuary granted to the house of Westminster
by King Edward, the saint ; the other the confirma-
tion of the same charter ... by Pope John." " He
begged the house, if he had no other instruments to
1 Ibid. p. 169.
i8o THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
show,1 they would not thereby take advantage, but
impute it to the iniquity of the times wherein they
were perished, declaring how, as by a miracle, these
were preserved, being found by a servant of my lord
cardinal's in a child's hand playing with them in
the street."2
Westminster being thus restored, the hope of the
monks ran high that other houses, too, would be
reopened. There seems to have been a project for
restoring one of the Canterbury houses. Cardinal
Pole writes from Croydon on the 28th May 1557,
to the abbat of St. Paul's, Rome, saying: "Your
paternity will perhaps have heard that the affairs of
St. Peter's monastery go on well, and thus by God's
grace they still continue proceeding from good to
better ; and I am not indeed without hope that one
of the two monasteries at my church of Canterbury
may soon be restored.3
Abbat Fecknam was zealous for the restoration of
other houses of his order, and used his influence on
their behalf both with the cardinal and the queen,
as is clear from the following petition of four
Glastonbury monks, then at Westminster : — 4
1 Bradley, p. 170. Miss Bradley gives no references to all these
statements, and it has been a cause of ceaseless trouble to identify them,
a task not always successful.
2 Ibid. p. 171.
3 Gal. V.S.P., vol. vi. p. 904, note.
4 This letter was probably written after Pole's letter to the abbat of
St. Paul's and before the end of the year which found Philip soon back
to the continent.
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT 181
" To the Rt. Rouble. Lord Chamberlain to the
Queen's Majesty.
" Right Honourable, in our most humble wise
your lordship's daily beadsmen, some time of the
house of Glastonbury, now here, monks in West-
minster, with all due submission we desire your
honour to extend your accustomed virtue, as it hath
been always heretofore propense to the honour of
Almighty God, to the honourable service of the
king and queen's majesties, so it may please your
good lordship again, for the honour of them, both
of God and of their majesties, to put the queen's
highness in remembrance of her gracious promise
concerning the erection of the late monastery of
Glastonbury, which promise of her grace hath been
so by her majesty declared that upon the same, we
your lordship's daily beadsmen, understanding my
lord cardinal's grace's pleasure to the same by the
procurement here of our reverend father abbat,
have gotten out the particulars ; and through a
warrant from my lord treasurer, our friends that
have builded and bestowed much upon reparation :
notwithstanding all now stands at a stay. We
think the case to be want of remembrance, which
cannot be so well brought unto her majesty's under-
standing as by your honourable lordship's favour
and help. And considering your lordship's most
godly disposition, we have a confidence thereof to
solicit the same, assuring your lordship of our daily
i82 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
prayer while we live, and of our successors' during
the world, if it may so please your lordship to take
it in hand.
" We ask nothing in gift to the foundation, but
only the house and site, the residue for the accus-
tomed rent, so that with our labour and husbandry
we may live there a few of us in our religious habits,
till the charity of good people may suffice a greater
number ; and the country there being so affected to
our religion, we believe we should find much help
among them towards the reparations and furniture
of the same, whereby we would haply prevent the
ruin of much, and repair no little part of the whole
to God's honour and for the better prosperity of the
king's and queen's majesties, with the whole realm.
For doubtless, if it shall please your good lordship
if there hath ever been any flagitious deed since the
creation of the world punished with the plague of
God, in our opinion the overthrow of Glastonbury
may be compared with the same, not surrendered as
other [abbeys] but extorted ; the abbat preposter-
ously put to death with two innocent virtuous
monks with him ; that if the thing were to be
scanned by any university or some learned council
in divinity, they would find it more dangerous than
is commonly taken ; which might move the queen's
majesty to the more speedy erection ; namely, it
being a home of such antiquity and fame through
all Christendom, first begun by St. Joseph of Arima-
thea, who took down the dead body of our saviour
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT 183
Christ from the cross and lieth buried in Glaston-
bury. And him most heartily we beseech to pray
unto Christ for good success unto your honourable
lordship in all your lordship's affairs, and now
specially in this our most humble request that we
may shortly do the same in Glaston1 for the king
and the queen's majesties as our founders and for
your lordship as a regular benefactor.
" Your lordship's daily beadsmen of Westminster.
"John Phagan.
John Neott.
William Adelwold.
William Kentwyn."2
1 The restoration of Glastonbury to English monks is, we hope, only-
deferred. The prayers of the martyred abbat Whiting, now beatified,
must plead strongly for the restoration of his house to his own brethren.
After the dissolution, several of the old monks remained in the neigh-
bourhood. One, D. Austin Eingwode (died in the odour of sanctity in
1 587), had not the heart to tear himself away from the home round which
so many gracious memories clung. He dwelt in a little cottage hard
by, where in poverty and solitude he kept his rule as strictly as if he
had been in his cell. His days were passed in prayer, in fastings and
vigils for his unhappy country. The country folk said the old man
saw visions and had the gift of prophecy, and they tell that he said :
" The abbey will one day be repaired and rebuilt for the like worship
which has ceased, and then peace and plenty will for a long time
abound " (Lee's Church under Queen Elizabeth, vol. i. p. 216). D. Austin
Ringwode's name does not appear on the pension list. Some of the
relics which had been venerated for centuries at Glastonbury were
secured by the monks at the time of the dissolution, and have been
handed down from generation to generation. One most valuable one,
" The Holy Thorn " — a thorn from the crown of thorns — is now vene-
rated at St. Mary's abbey, Stanbrook, in a chapel built for the purpose.
2 Dugdale, vol. i. p. 9. These names do not appear on the pension
list of Glastonbury, which bears their surnames. The signatures here
give their names in religion.
i84 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
St. Albans was also to be restored. The former
abbat, Richard Boreman or Stevenage, had remained
in the neighbourhood and hoped one day to see his
house reopened. To his great joy, consent was given
to his prayer. This must have been late in 1558;
for Mary died before anything could be done. And
for very grief the abbat took to his bed and died
two weeks after of a broken heart.1
Mary died on the morning of Nov. 17, 1558, and
on the same day cardinal Pole breathed his last
at Lambeth.2 The prospects of the Church were
gloomy and uncertain ; for although Elizabeth had
not begun to disclose her hand, yet what was known
of her did not warrant any hopeful future. Mary's
funeral rites were duly solemnised, and Fecknam
preached one of the funeral sermons,3 and White,
bishop of Winchester, the other.
The new queen took umbrage at the bishop's
sermon, and ordered him to be confined to his own
house. She soon began to show the direction of
her policy. Perhaps it is wrong to say she was
herself personally in favour of the reformation as
a religious movement ; but policy forced her into a
position which could only be preserved, as things
1 Dugdale, vol. ii. p. 207.
2 There have been all sorts of statements about the date of Pole's
death, some placing it on the 19th. But all doubt is now set aside by
a letter from Priuli to his brother in Venice : "On the 17th instant,
seven hours after midnight, the queen passed from this life, and my
most reverend lord followed her at seven o'clock on the evening of
the same day" (Gal. V.S.P., vi. n. 1 287-1 292).
3 MS. Cott. Vesp. D. xviii. fol. 92.
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT 185
then seemed to stand, by cutting England off once
more from the centre of Unity, and by rejecting the
cardinal point of Catholic worship, the mass.1 But
still she had a liking rather than otherwise for
such of the outward forms of Catholicism, and
even of its discipline, as were compatible with her
own supremacy. She had no sympathy with the
iconoclastic rage of the Puritan party, who were
now struggling for the upper hand.2 Besides
1 Paul IV. it seems refused to recognise her, which of course he could
have done without any reference to the matter of her father's divorce ;
for there was no question of legitimate birth, but of the fact, that by
law and the will of her father, as well as by the acceptance of the
nation, she succeeded. Then again Henry II. of France had lately
ordered the arms of England to be quartered with those of Scotland
upon the marriage of his son with Mary Stuart ; and Elizabeth's
advisers convinced the queen that this was a direct questioning of her
title, as Mary Stuart was by legitimate birth the heiress to the English
throne. All this made the queen determined at any cost to secure her
position.
2 In her own private chapel Elizabeth kept many of the ornaments
of Catholic usages. "The altar was furnished with rich plate, two
fair gilt candlesticks with tapers in them and a massy crucifix of
silver in the midst thereof " (Heylin, p. 296). " She had honourable
sentiments of the use of the cross, of the blessed virgin and other
saints, and never mentioned them without regard and reverence"
(Collier, vol. ii. p. 412). In fine, she was so fixed in this practice that all
Parker's "learning and zeal could not persuade her to part with the
crucifix and lighted tapers in her own closet. She thought, 'tis likely,
that the arguing against the use, from the abuse, was short of an exact
reasoning" (ibid. p. 435). Her Catholic instinct also revolted against
the idea of a married clergy, which she only tolerated as the surest
method of alienating them from the pope. Parker writes to Cecil, and
reports some speeches uttered to him by the queen against the marriage
of the clergy : " I was in a horror," says he, " to hear such words
to come from her mild nature and Christianly learned conscience,
as she spake concerning God's holy ordinance and institution of
matrimony. . . . Insomuch that the queen's highness expressed to me a
186 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
intending to preserve such a hierarchy as she
could (Providence arranging that matter), she also
wanted, as we shall see, to keep at least West-
minster as a monastery, if such an institution could
find place in her scheme of religion. This, in view
of her strong and ineradicable notions as to the
marriage of the clergy, seems to be the most likely
explanation of her sending for the abbat of West-
minster at a very early period of her reign. But
Fecknam, whatever the nature of the private inter-
view may have been, could not enter into her
measures, for the proposal meant treason to his con-
science. It is said she even tried to bribe him to
come over to her side by the promise of the vacant
archbishopric of Canterbury. But all was in vain.1
The new Parliament opened ominously for the
monks. The queen assisted at the usual mass of the
Holy Ghost in the abbey on the 25 th of January.
" On arriving at Westminster abbey, the abbat,
repentance that we were thus appointed in office, wishing it had been
otherwise, which inclination being known at large to queen Marie's
clergy they laugh prettily, to see how the clergy of our time is handled,
and what equity of law is ministered to our sort. But by patience
and silence we pass over, &c, and leave all to God ; in the meantime we
have cause all to be utterly discomforted and discouraged" (Strype,
Life of Parker, Appendix, vol. iii. pp. 50, 51).
1 Fuller, Worthies of England, vol. ii. p. 477. This interview was
most likely before her coronation, January 14th, or before the opening
of Parliament, January 25th ; for on that latter date the queen began
her course of reformation. According to the old custom, the abbat
of Westminster had some days previous to the coronation to wait on
the sovereign and give instructions upon the forthcoming ceremony.
See Missale Westmon. (H.B.S.), p. 676.
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT 187
vested pontifically, with all his monks in procession,
each of them having a lighted torch in his hand, re-
ceived her as usual, giving her first of all incense and
holy water ; and when her majesty saw the monks
who accompanied her with the torches she said :
" Away with those torches, for we see very well ! " x
The various bills introduced for the recognition
of the queen's title (without any reference, however,
to the validity of the marriage of her mother, Anne
Boleyn) and the restoration of the first-fruits, the
all-important bills relating to the royal supremacy
and to the new liturgy, came before a house of
commons packed for the occasion, and a house of
lords which included only a few bishops, who, to-
gether with Fecknam, were left to defend the cause
of the Church.2 The abbat in a vigorous speech
opposed any changes in religion. He said —
" My good Lords, when in Queen Mary's days,
your honours do know right well how the people
of this realm did live in an order; and would not
run before laws nor openly disobey the queen's
1 Calendar of Venetian S.P., vol. vii. No. 15.
2 The state of the English hierarchy on Elizabeth's accession was
as follows : Six sees were vacant by death, viz. Canterbury, Oxford,
Salisbury, Bangor, Gloucester, and Hereford ; although nominations
had been made to the five last, they were all set aside by the new
queen. Before the end of the year four more bishops died, Kochester,
Norwich, Chichester, and Bristol. When Parliament met on January
25, 1559, the bishops of Durham, Peterborough, Bath and Wells, and
St. Davids were absent, but had appointed Heath of York their proxy.
Lincoln was ill ; Ely away on an embassy (but returned and took his
seat in April) ; St Asaphs was not summoned. So out of twenty-six
sees, only nine were present.
1 88 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
highness' s proceeding and proclamation. There was
no spoiling of churches, pulling down of altars, and
most blasphemous treading down of sacraments
under their feet and hanging up the knave of clubs
in the place thereof. There was no skurching nor
cutting of the faces and legs of the crucifix and
image of Christ. There was no open flesh-eating,
nor shambles keeping in the Lent and days pro-
hibited. The subjects of this realm, and in especi-
ally the nobility and such as were of the honourable
council, did in queen Mary's days know the way
unto churches and chapels, there to begin their daily
work with calling for help and grace by humble
prayer and serving of God. And now since the
coming and reign of our most sovereign and dear
lady queen Elizabeth, by the only preachers and
scaffold-players of this new religion all things are
turned upside down." *
Fecknam opposed in all their stages the bills 2 for
the supremacy and for the restoration to the crown
of the first-fruits, though he does not seem to
have been present in the house of lords during
the debates of April 26, 27, and 28, on the act of
Uniformity of Common Prayer and Service.3
1 MS. Cott. Vesp. D. xviii. fol. 86. See also Strype's Annals, vol. i.
Part II. p. 436.
2 D'Ewes, Journals of all the Parliaments during the Reign of Queen
Elizabeth, p. 30.
3 Heath, archbishop of York, refers in his speech to the pope, Paul
IV., in terms which show that considerable irritation existed against
him personally, and only makes the pronouncement in regard to the
JOHN FECKNAM, ABB AT 189
But before it was passed and the new liturgy
authorised, a public dispensation was appointed to
be held at the end of March, under the presi-
dency of Sir Francis Bacon. As the queen and
her ministers had arranged the meeting only as a
pretext for breaking down the opposition of the
bishops, and to secure their subsequent punishment,
Fecknam, although an acknowledged champion of
the Catholic Cause, when at the end he was called
upon by Bacon to take part, refused to do so. On
April 3rd the disputation broke up, and two of the
bishops, Lincoln and Winchester, were sent to the
Tower. Those of Lichfield, Chester, and Carlisle,
with three doctors who had taken part in it, were
otherwise punished.
In spite of the unanimous opposition of the
bishops, the act of the Royal Supremacy was passed
and became law May 5, 1559. II Schifanoya writes
the next day to the castellan of Mantua : " Parlia-
pope as the centre of unity all the more remarkable. On this point
Heath is explicit. " If by this our relinquishing of the see of Home,
there were none other matter therein than a withdrawing of our
obedience from the pope's person, Paul the fourth of that name, which
hath declared himself to be a very austere stern father unto us ever
since his first entrance into Peter's chair, then the cause were not
of such importance as it is ; as will immediately appear. For by
relinquishing and forsaking the church or see of Eome, we must
forsake and fly, first, from all general councils ; secondly, from all
canonical and ecclesiastical laws of the church of Christ ; thirdly, from
the judgment of all other christian princes ; fourthly and lastly, we
must forsake and fly from the holy unity of Christ's church, and so,
by leaping out of Peter's ship, we hazard ourselves to be overwhelmed
in the waves of schism, of sects and divisions" (Strype's Annals, I.
Appendix 8).
190 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
ment will rise this week, the two houses having
enacted that all the convents and monasteries of
friars, monks, nuns, and hospitallers of St. John
of Jerusalem, are to be suppressed as heretofore,
and all their religious to be expelled. Such of
them who will take the oath against the pon-
tifical authority, and approve of the new laws
abjuring their own professions, are to receive pen-
sions for their maintenance ; but the greater part
of them have left the kingdom in order not to
take such oaths. " * A week afterward he writes :
" Westminster abbey with the monks and the rest
of the monasteries and friaries will be appropri-
ated to the Crown, pensions being given to those
who will swear to and approve of the laws." 2
Commissioners were appointed to administer the
oath ; refusal involved forfeiture of all benefice and
office, and disablement for any further promotion.
It is to be noted that the mere refusal of the oath
only incurred deprivation, not imprisonment, which
was illegal. It was an expedient for getting out of
office all opposers of the royal policy. But, after
thirty days of the passing of the act, script, or
word, or deed in defence of the newly abolished
papal supremacy, entailed for the first offence loss
of all property, for the second the penalties of
premunire, and for the third death. Any active
opposition was thus punishable : but a simple
i Gal. V.SP.X vol. vii. No. 68.
2 Ibid, No. 71.
JOHN FECKNAM, ABB AT 191
passive refusal to accept the queen as supreme in
matters ecclesiastical was tolerated even after the
deprivation of the refuser.
The letters to the commissioners were signed
May 23, 1559. But they proceeded slowly, in the
hopes of winning over some.1 By the end of the
year the oath had been offered to all the bishops,
who, with the exception of Kitchin, refused, and
were therefore deprived but were not as yet im-
prisoned.
During the time of the debates in Parliament on
the changes in religion, abbat Fecknam was quietly
going on at Westminster unmoved by the approach-
ing storm. He kept his soul in peace through it
all. He knew the consequences of his refusal of
the queen's offer, but let the evil of the day take
heed to itself. So he went on. The story goes
that he was engaged in planting elm trees in his
garden at Westminster when a message came to
tell him that a majority in the house of commons
had declared for the dissolution of all religious
houses,2 and remarked that he planted in vain, for
that he and his monks would soon have to go.
"Not in vain," replied the abbat. "Those that
1 How slowly they set to work is clear from the date of the depositions.
Bonner they disposed of that very month ; Lichfield, Chester, Carlisle,
Lincoln, Winchester, and Worcester in June ; York, St. Asaph, Ely,
in July ; Durham in September ; Bath and Peterborough in October ;
Exeter in November. When St. David's was voided is not known.
2 This was on April 29. The bill passed the Lords, May 5. See
Strype's Annals, I. (ed. Oxford), vol. i. Part I. p. 99.
i92 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
come after me may perhaps be scholars and lovers
of retirement, and whilst walking under the shades
of these trees they may sometimes think of the
olden religion of England, and the last abbat of
this place." And so he went on with his planting.1
II Schifanoya, who was a Mantuan correspon-
dent, seemingly official, tells us hitherto unknown
details about the second dissolution of Westminster.
Writing on June 6, he says : —
"The poor bishop [Bonner] has taken sanctuary
at Westminster abbey to avoid molestation from
many persons who demand considerable sums of
money from him ; but the abbey cannot last long,
as the abbat made a similar reply [of refusal] when
it was offered him to remain securely in his abbey
with his habit and the monks, to live together as
they had done till now, provided that he would
celebrate in his church the divine offices and mass,
administering the sacraments in the same manner
as in the other churches of London, and that he
would take the oath like the other servants, officials,
pensioners, and dependents of the crown, and ac-
knowledge this establishment as from the hands of
her majesty. To these things the abbat would by
no means consent ; so after St. John's day, the term
fixed by Parliament for all persons to consent and
1 Fuller, Church History of Britain (ed. Oxford), vol. v. p. 96, says
tins took place soon after the accession. But Heylin, Examen Ilistori-
cum, p. 167, with much more probability, puts the story at the time
when the dissolution of the monastery was decreed.
JOHN FECKNAM, ABB AT 193
swear to all the statutes and laws or to lose what
they have, all of them will go about their business,
though no one can leave the kingdom." 1
On the 27th of June he writes again: "Six or
eight bishops have been deprived not only of their
bishoprics but of all their other revenues, being
bound also not to depart from England, and not to
preach or exhort whatever in public or in private,
and still less to write anything against the orders
and statutes of this parliament ; nor [to give occa-
sion to] insurrection or any other scandalous act,
under pain of perpetual imprisonment ; [the queen's
ministers] demanding security and promise to be
given by one bishop for the other. . . . Yesterday
these good reverend fathers 2 underwent their depri-
vation, and received orders where they are to dwell,
before the council which assembled here in London
in the house of a sheriff for this purpose, they being
humble, abject, and habited like simple and poor
priests — a sight which would have grieved you. . . .
" The abbat of Westminster with all his monks did
the like, and are therefore deprived of the revenues of
the monastery and of all the rest of their property." 3
Little time was now lost in putting into effect
the result of Fecknam's refusal. The end came
on July 12, 1559. The abbat and his monks were
1 Gal. V.S.P., vol. vii. No. 78.
2 The six bishops were those of London, Worcester, Chester, Carlisle,
Lichfield, and Llandaff. Winchester and Lincoln were already in the
Tower.
3 Cal. V.S.P., vol. viii. No. 82.
VOL. I. N
i94 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
turned out, and Westminster knew the benedictines
no more. As they had refused to take the oath of
supremacy, they received no pensions, which were
only promised on that condition.1
The day after, Fecknam and one John Moulton,
most likely one of the monks, raised the sum of
^"40, on what was evidently private plate, from Sir
Thomas Curtis, the same to be considered as a loan
if paid back before the feast of All Saints next.2
A few days after the suppression, the com-
missioners appointed to survey, examine, and order
concerning the state of the late monastery, directed
the receivers to pay over to the abbat the sum of
^374, 14s. 6d. for various considerations.3
What became immediately of the abbat and his
monks we do not at present know ; but it is most
likely that, like the bishops, he received orders
where to dwell.
1 It is generally said by writers that the monks had pensions. There
is, we believe, no pension list extant, and the testimony of II Schifanoya,
quoted above, seems entirely to do away with any such idea. Perhaps
those who, like Fecknam, had been in receipt of pensions under Henry
Till, now resumed those. This perhaps is likely the meaning of dean
Stanley's assertion, based on the chapter-book of 1569 (see Memorials,
p. 406, note), which book unfortunately, like the rest of the Westminster
documents, is not accessible.
2 Historical MSS. Commission, Fourth Report, p. 178.
3 Ibid. This is the sum Miss Bradley (Dictionary of National Bio-
graphy, sub Feckenham) has evidently mistaken for a pension, and of
which she says Fecknam generously gave up a part to dean Bill. A
few years later he made over to the dean and chapter (with the hope
doubtlessly of a future return of England to the Church) certain ecclesi-
astical vestments and altar hangings specified in an inventory attached
to the deed of gift (April 4, fifth of Elizabeth).
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT 195
But very soon it was considered to be injurious to
the new order of things that the bishops and abbat
should be at liberty. There had been, as yet, no com-
plaint of any overt act on their part against the new
statutes. But at the following Easter (1560) their
continued absence from the state worship was made
a cause for excommunicating and then imprisoning
them. This was the resolution taken by the queen
and her council: ''The xx of May was sent to the
Tower master Fecknam, doctor Watson, late bishop
of Lincoln, and doctor Cole, late dean of Paul's, and
doctor Chadsay ; and at night about viii of the clock
was sent to the Fleet doctor Score, and master Feck-
nam, the last abbat of Westminster, to Tower." 1
Parker,2 the new archbishop of Canterbury, it was
who sent the abbat to prison.
Of his life in the Tower we have gathered a few
particulars. He had to pay heavily for his food and
accommodation. The charges, for instance, in the
Fleet prison were then £1 a week for board and
the privilege of a single bed ; this sum, be it re-
1 Machyn, p. 235. Jewel writes to Peter Martyr (May 22, 1560) :
" Bonner, the monk Feckenham, [Dr.] Pate, [Dr.] Story the civilian,
and Watson [bishop of Lincoln] sent to prison for having obstinately
refused attendance on public worship, and everywhere declaiming and
railing against that religion which we now profess." And two years
(February 7, 1562) after he again writes : " The Marian bishops are still
•confined to the Tower, and are going on in their old way. If the laws
were but as rigorous now as in the time of Henry, they would submit
themselves without difficulty. They are an obstinate and untamed
set of men, but are nevertheless subdued by terror and the sword."
Zurich Letters (Parker Society), First Series, pp. 79, 101.
2 Stowe, Annals of the Reformation, vol. i. Part I. p. 211.
196 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
membered, is equal to ^10 a week ; the charges were
most likely the same at the Tower. Even at this
high cost, his cell was damp and unhealthy, the food
was bad, and he was subjected to close confinement.
The prisoners were kept separate, and of this they so
complained, that Sir Edward Warner, lieutenant of
the Tower, in writing to the council (June 14, 1560),
says : —
" First he put your lordships in remembrance
that the late bishops, with Mr. Fecknam and Mr.
Boxall, being all eight in number, be close and
severally kept, for which they continually call upon
him to make on their names humble suit to have
more liberty ; informing your lordships therewith
how troublesome it is to serve so many persons
severally so long together." 1
The council wrote on 4th September to the
archbishop giving leave that the prisoners, un-
less he had any objection, might dine at two
tables, together with the order in which they had
to sit. The archbishop of York, the bishop of
Worcester, abbat Fecknam, and Boxall, dean of
Peterborough and secretary of state under queen
Mary, were to dine at one table ; and the bishops
of Ely, Bath and Wells, Exeter, and Lincoln at
the other. Parker consented, and (September 6th)
authorised the lieutenant to make the change.2
1 P.R.O. Bom. Eliz., vol. xxiii. No. 40, quoted by Bridgett and Knox
in Queen Elizabeth and the Catholic Hierarchy, p. 165.
2 Parker Correspondence (Parker Society), pp. T21, 122.
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT 197
This new arrangement would be better at least, for
they would have the help of each other's society to
resist the insidious attacks made to bring them to
conformity. As each Easter came round, threats
of death were reported for those who would refuse
to partake of the new sacrament.1 In March 1563
Parliament had given authority to administer the
oath, with the penalty now of death for those who
refused it.2 But so far the oath had not been again
tendered to the prisoners. They were first to be
tried in another way. Occasion was taken of the
plague, then raging in the City, to remove them
from the Tower and commit them to the custody of
the new bishops. They had themselves petitioned
the council "to be removed to some other con-
venient place for their better safeguard from the
present infection of the plague." 3 But this slight
grace shown to them did not please the preachers
of the new religion. Stowe in his Memoranda says:
"Anno 1563 in September the old bishops and
divers doctors were removed out of the tower into
the new bishops' houses, there to remain prisoners
under their custody (the plague being then in the
city was thought to be the cause) ; but their de-
liverance (or rather change of prison) did so much
offend the people that the preachers at Paul's Cross
and on other places, both of the city and the
1 Bridgett and Knox, p. 42.
2 Lingard (ed. Dolman, 1849), vol. vi. p. 83.
3 Parker Correspondence, p. 192.
198 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
country, preached (as it was thought of many wise
men) very seditiously, as Baldwin at Paul's Cross
wishing a gallows set up in Smithfield, and the old
bishops and other papists to be hanged thereon.
He himself died of the plague the next week after."1
Abbat Fecknam was sent, first of all, back to his
old home at Westminster, to the care of Goodman,
the new dean. There is a letter from Grindal,
bishop of London, to Cecil, of the date October 15,
1563, suggesting that Fecknam should be sent to
some bishop.
"The bishop of Winton, when he was with me,
said if he should have any, he could best deal with
Fecknam, for in king Edward's days he travailed
with Fecknam in the Tower and brought him to
subscribe to all things, saving the Presence and one
or two more articles. Ye might do very well (in my
opinion) to ease the poor dean of Westminster, and
send the other also to some other bishop, as Sarum
or Chichester."2
The suggestion was taken, and the dean was
relieved of the unwelcome presence of the abbat ;
and that same winter Fecknam was sent to Home,
bishop of Winchester, who was boasting he could pre-
vail over the abbat's constancy. With what results
will appear. In the bishop's house he was treated very
uncivilly and roughly. " We must not think of these
1 Three Fifteenth-Gentury Chronicles, with Historical Memoranda, by
John Stowe (Cam. Soc), p. 126.
2 Grindal's Remains, p. 282 (Parker Society).
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT 199
first intruders into the Catholic sees of England as
if they were modern Anglican bishops, gentlemen of
refinement and of enlarged and liberal minds, who,
if we could imagine them in the position of unwilling
jailors to Catholic bishops, would seek by every
means to alleviate their lot." 1
We shall see later on what the treatment was
the prisoners had to endure at the hands of their
episcopal jailors.
Home began to ply the abbat with questions on
the dangerous subject of the oath. Fecknam wrote
a clever paper in answer, giving the reasons which
would hinder him from taking the oath. We see
the old dialectical skill which made him so feared
as an opponent. Among other difficulties, he says :
"The fourth and last point is that I must swear
to the observation of this oath, not only to the
queen's highness, and our sovereign lady that now
is, but also unto her heirs and successors, kings and
queens of this realm ; and because every Christian
man ought to be careful to avoid perjury therein,
I would right gladly know that if any her highness
successors should by the refusal of the said title
of supremacy bind her subjects by the like statute
law unto the clean contrary [experience whereof
was of late made in this realm, that it is yet fresh in
the memories of all men] ; in this case I would right
gladly know what authority is able to dispense again
with the oath ? And if there be none at all, then
1 Bridgett and Knox, p. 94.
200 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
the subjects of this realm in this case are bound, and
that by book-oath, to live in a continual disobedience
to the laws of their sovereign lord or lady, king or
queen, the case whereof is very lamentable " x
The abbat was always ready to listen ; 2 and was
able at least to prove to his opponents that his
refusal to submit to the royal supremacy in ecclesi-
astical affairs was solely a matter of conscience.
Home complains that Fecknam used to point to
his heart and say : " The matter itself is founded
here, that shall never go out." 3 In spite of frequent
reports spread abroad of an approaching recantation,
day and hour being even fixed by the gossips, Home,
finding that all his endeavours were unavailing to
bring over the abbat to his own way of thinking,
kept him for six weeks a close prisoner in the
house, and after allowing him to be grossly insulted
at his table, made complaint to the council and
procured his return to the Tower.4
In April 1564 archbishop Parker had a conversa-
tion with Cecil, and urged the enforcement of the
oath according to the recent act. But Cecil gave him
to know that the queen was unwilling to have the
oath tendered for the second time, for that meant
death. The archbishop acted under the instructions
1 Home's An Answer to M. Fekenham, p. 101.
2 " I hear said Mr. Fecknam is not so precise (as Watson, who refused
all conference) but could be contented to confer" (Grindal to Cecil,
p. 282).
3 Home's An Answer to M. Fekenham, p. 3.
4 Ibid. p. 129.
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT 201
he received, and sent round a circular, the draft of
which Cecil corrected, to the rest of his bishops
ordering them not to tender the oath to any one a
second time without previously referring the matter
to him. But this instruction had to be kept secret.1
An exception, however, was made in the case of
Bonner, a fellow-prisoner with the abbat, who had
incurred the special hatred of all the reformers by
his severity under the last reign. How that wily
old lawyer Bonner checkmated Home and all
Elizabeth's government on the plea that the in-
truded bishop of Winchester was no bishop in the
eyes of the law, is a well known story.
We have seen how Home, having failed to con-
vince the abbat, was glad to get rid of him ; and
Fecknam on his side preferred, it is said, to go back
to the Tower rather than stay with the bishop. We
find him there in custody in January 1565, and he
probably returned on the occasion of Home's fiasco
with Bonner. In the Tower he lingered on ; and
we know but little of his imprisonment.2 As Home
had complained to the council of the abbat' s in-
tractability, Fecknam in a letter to Sir W. Cecil
1 Parker Correspondence, pp. 173-175.
2 A poem In Laudem Joannis Fecknam, by an unknown author,
printed in the Downside Review (vol. i. p. 430), tells us some particulars
of his life at this time. It was his own choice to return to the Tower ;
for he said, "A prison is better than a bishop's palace." And on
one occasion when Cecil expressed his wonder that the abbat lived so
long, " The reason is," said he, " because I live shut up in the prison
and not the prison in me. I willingly bear my chains."
202 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
(March 14, 1565) puts the matter into its real
light.
" According to your honour's pleasure, signified
to me by the lieutenant, I have sent to your honour
such writings as have passed between my lord
bishop of Winchester and me, touching the oath
of the queen's highness' supremacy, in perusing
whereof I do most humbly beseech your honour
to observe how slenderly his lordship hath satisfied
my expectations therein : who in requesting of his
lordship to be resolved by the authority of the
scriptures, doctors, general councils, and by the
example of the like government in some one part
and church of all Christendom : his lordship in
no one part of his resolutions hath alledged any
testimony out of any one of them : but only hath
used the authority of his own bare words, naked
talk and sentences ; which in so great and weighty
a matter of conscience I esteem and weigh as
nothing. And if his lordship shall at any time
hereafter (and especially at your honour's request)
be able to bring forth any better matter, I shall
be, at the sight thereof, at all times in readiness
to receive the said oath, and to perform my promise
before made in the writings. But if his lordship
shall be found (notwithstanding your honour's re-
quest) to have no better matter in store, I shall for
my duty's sake towards the queen's majesty, con-
sidering the degree and estate her highness hath
placed him in, abstain from the plain speech which
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT 203
I might justly use (his lordship first beginning the
complaint), yet that notwithstanding your honour
must give me leave to think that his lordship hath
not all the Divine Scriptures, doctors, general
councils, and all other kinds of learning so much
at his commandment as I have oftentimes heard
him boast and speak of. And this much to write
of my own secret thought, either against him or yet
any other, it is very much contrary to the inclination
of my nature : for I being a poor man in trouble am
now, likewise at all other times, very loath to touch
him or any man else. But whensoever it shall
please your honour by your wisdom to weigh the
matter indifferently between us, your honour shall
be sure to have this short end and conclusion
thereof : that either upon his lordship's more
pytthyer (?pithier) and learned resolutions, your
honour shall be well assured that I will receive the
oath, or else, for lack of learned resolutions, your
honour shall have certain and sure knowledge that
the stay so long a time on my part, made in not
receiving of the same oath, is of conscience and not
of will stubbornly set ; but only of dread and fear
to commit perjury, thereby to procure and purchase
to myself God his wrath and indignation : finally to
inherit perpetual death and torment of hell fire, and
that remedyless, by a separation making of myself
from God and the unity of his Catholic Church,
being always after unsure, how or by what means
I may be united and knit thereunto again. The
2o4 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
upright and due consideration of this my lamentable
state is all that I do seek at your honour's hands,
as knoweth our Lord God, who long preserve your
good honour with much increase thereof.
" From the Tower, this xiiii of this present March,
by your poor orator, John Fecknam, priste." 1
Whilst in the Tower (1570), Fecknam wrote a
pamphlet which casts a light on the " gentle per-
suasiveness," used in his regard. It was written in
answer to Sir Francis Jobson, the lieutenant of the
Tower, on Mr. Pellam's request, " upon Sunday last
[January 15, 1570], as I came from the church, to
know my liking of M. Gough's sermon. Where-
unto I answered : that I was very loath to find
any fault with the sayings or doings of any man,
being already in trouble as you know. You replied
and said : that I was not able to find fault where no
fault was. I had not then no leisure to make any
further answer, you departing homewards and I to
my prison." He then discusses the various opinions
broached in the course of the sermon, and ends up
with these words : " I desire, I say, to make my
humble suit unto your worships for myself and my
prison-fellows both, that hereafter we may not be
haled by the arms to the church in such violent
manner against our wills, against all former examples,
against the doctrine of your own side (Luther, Bucer,
Zwinglius, Oecolampadius, Melancthon, and the rest,
1 Dom Eliz., xxxvi. 23.
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT 205
every one writing and earnestly persuading that all
violence be taken away in matters of religion), there
to hear such preachers as care not what they say
so they somewhat say against the professed faith of
Christ's Catholic Church ; and there to hear a sermon,
not of persuading us, but of railing upon us. This,
if your worships will incline unto for charity sake,
we shall have to render you most humble thanks,
and whatsoever else we may do in this our heavy
time of imprisonment." 1
Some time after the abbat was removed to the
Marshalsea, but the exact date has not been yet
discovered.2 He was still in the Tower 157 1, for in
the March of that year he was allowed to have his
meals at the table of the lieutenant of the Tower,3
and is known in the June to have attended his
fellow-prisoner, Dr. John Story, at the scaffold
Stevens says : " Many protestants, being ashamed
to see a man who had deserved so well so in-
humanly treated, prevailed that he should be put
out of the Tower and removed to the Marshalsea,
where he had a little more liberty." 4 But on July
17, 1574, the council ordered the keeper of the
Marshalsea to take him before the archbishop of
Canterbury at his grace's leisure, and " upon bonds
taken of him by the said lord bishop, to set him at
1 L. T., An Answer to Certain Assertions of M. Fecknam, &c, p. 17.
2 Bradley's Westminster, p. 179.
3 Acts of the Privy Council (New Series), vol. viii. p. 21.
4 Additions to the Monasticon, vol. i. p. 289.
206 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
liberty." And they also wrote the same day to the
archbishop empowering him to accept bail for Mr.
Dr. Feckenham on the same conditions as those
lately made (Jnly 5th) in the case of bishop
Watson. These were that he " shall not by speech,
writing, or any other means induce or intice any
person to any opinion or act to be done contrary
to the laws established in the realm for causes of
religion," and that he should dwell in a specified
place, " and not to depart from thence at any time
without the license of the lords of the council," and
that he was not to be allowed to receive visitors. *
After fourteen years' confinement, Fecknam was
now released on parole and went to live in Hol-
born, where, no sooner had he partly regained his
liberty, than he was engaged in works of charity
and usefulness. Benevolence was so marked a
feature in his character that, as Fuller says, "he
relieved the poor wheresoever he came, so that flies
flock not thicker about spilt honey than the beggars
constantly crowded about him." 2 Large sums of
money seem to have been at his disposal, for the
-charitable were assured, from their knowledge of his
character, that their alms entrusted to his care would
reach the most needy and the most deserving of
the poor. In Holborn he built an aqueduct for the
luse of the inhabitants.3 He distributed every day the
1 Acts of the Privy Council (New Series), 1574, vol. viii. pp. 269, 264.
2 Worthies of England, vol. ii. p. 477.
-3 Stevens, vol. i. p. 28a.
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT 207
milk of twelve cows among the sick and poor of
the district, and took under his special charge the
orphans. He encouraged the youth of the place in
manly sports by giving prizes, and thought it better
they should on Sundays have games, such as all
English lads love, rather than attend the new fashion
of worship.1 Thus spending himself for others, and
already broken down by the rigours of his long
imprisonment, he fell ill. On July 18, 1575, the
council ordered " the Master of the Rolls, or in his
absence the Recorder of London, to take bondes of
Doctor Feckenham for his good behaviour, and that
at Michaelmas next he shall return to the place
where he presently is, and in the meantime he may
repair to the Baths." 2 Whilst in this town he built,
in 1576, a hospice for the poor "by the White
Bath," that they too might come and get the benefit
of the waters.3
Whilst thus a prisoner on parole, reports had
reached the ears of the Council (June 24, 1577)
that Fecknam and the others " have very much
abused themselves by suffering certain of her
majesty's evil-disposed subjects to resort unto them,
whom they have perverted in religion." 4 For Aylmer,
the bishop of London, had lately written to Burghley
signifying " that he liked not that Fecknam, late
1 Hymnus in Laudem J. Fechtamis, Harl. MS. 3258, fol. 45.
2 Acts P.C., vol. ix. p. 8. On June 19, 1576, lie got a similar
license.
3 See Downside Revieiv, vol. xiv. p. 323.
4 Acts, vol. ix. p. 37 1.
2o8 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
abbat of Westminster, Watson, late bishop of
Lincoln, and Young, another active popish dignitary
under queen Mary, should continue where they
were, in London, in the Fleet or Marshalsea, where
by their converse and advice they might instigate
and do mischief; advising that they might be placed
again, as they had been before, with some three
bishops, at Winchester, Lincoln, Chichester, or
Ely, and that for his part, he, if he were out of
his first-fruits, could be content to have one of
them." *
So in the following month Walsingham wrote to
the bishops who had formerly been charged with
these prisoners, saying that as inconvenience and
mischief is daily found to increase, not only to the
danger of her majesty's person but to the disturbance
of the common quiet of the realm on account of the
lenity shown to such as obstinately refused to come to
church for sermons and common prayer, he appoints
a consultation to be held which should be attended
by the bishops and their chancellors and others they
think fit. The secretary then goes on to say : —
"And fore-as-much as the special point of the
said consultation will stand upon the order that
may be taken generally with all them that refuse
to come to the church, and in particular what is
meetest to be done with Watson, Fecknam, Harps-
field, and others of that ring that are thought to be
the leaders and pillars of the consciences of great
1 Strype, Life of Bishop Aylwer, p. 25.
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT 209
numbers of such as he carried with the errors,
whether it be not fit they be disputed with, all in
some private sort and after disputation had with
them, and they thereby not reduced to conformity;
then whether it shall be better to banish them the
realm or to keep them here together in some
straight sort as that they may be kept from all
conference." 1
The result of these consultations was soon made
known, for by the end of July (1577) the council
ordered Cox, the bishop of Ely, to receive abbat
Fecknam, and divided the rest of the prisoners
among other anglican bishops. The real cause of
this second incarceration was that Elizabeth, at last
driven to desperation, began to apply the penalty
of death attached to the act of 1571, which was
her answer to the deposing bull of Pius V. The act
had not hitherto been enforced, although its pro-
visions were such as made illegal any communica-
tion, under any shape or form, with Rome. But
just then the seminary at Douai, about which more
in the next chapters, was beginning to pour priests
into England in defiance of her laws, and the first
blood for conscience7 sake was shed in this year by
the heroic Cuthbert Mayne. The queen, rightly or
1 P.R.O. Bom Eliz., cxiv. 69. Walsingham also suggests that, if
Fecknam and the others are to be kept in durance, the cost of their
keep was to be found in taxing such of the bishops and clergy as are
non-residents and have pluralities some yearly contribution for the
finding of them, and a convenient stipend to be given to their keeper.
See Bridgett and Knox, p. 178.
VOL. I. 0
210 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
wrongly, was in terror of plots against her life ;
and the government had determined upon taking
stringent measures, and keeping in custody the most
prominent of those who were known to be dis-
affected to her religious policy. Together with the
order of the council, the notorious Cox, bishop of
Ely, received a stringent code of regulations for
the treatment of the aged abbat — they were to
this effect : —
" i. That his lodgings be in some convenient part
of your house, that he may be both there in safe
custody and also have no easy access of your house-
hold people unto him, other than such as you shall
appoint and know to be settled in religion and
honesty, as that they may not be perverted in religion
or any otherwise corrupted by him.
"2. That he be not admitted unto your table
except upon some good occasion, to have ministered
to him there in the presence of some that shall
happen to resort unto you, such talk whereby the
hearers may be confirmed in the truth ; but to have
his diet by himself alone in his chamber ; and that
in no superfluity, but after the spare manner of
scholars' commoners.
11 3. That you suffer none (unless some one to
attend upon him) to have access unto him, but
such as you shall know to be persons well conformed
in true religion, and not likely to be weakened in
the profession of the said religion by any con-
ference they shall have with him.
JOHN FECKNAM, ABB AT 211
" 4. That you permit him not at any time and
place whilst he is with you to enter into any dis-
putations of matters of religion, or to reason thereof,
otherwise than upon such occasion as shall be by
you or in your presence with your good liking by
some others ministered unto him.
"5. That he have ministered unto him such books
of learned men and sound writers in divinity as you
are able to lend him, and none other.
" 6. That he have no liberty to walk abroad to
take the air, but when yourself is best at leisure
to go with him, or accompanied with such as you
shall appoint.
" 7. That you do your endeavour by all good
persuasion to bring him to the hearing of sermons
and other exercises of religion in your house, and
the chapel or church which you most commonly
frequent." 1
This disposes of the pleasing fiction some writers
maintain, that the abbat and others of the deposed
clergy were kept as guests under gentle restraint
in the houses of protestant bishops. To be de-
prived of liberty, company, the solaces of their
religion and all they held dear, was bad enough
treatment ; but to be harassed on religious topics
on every conceivable occasion, to have to take
the air, on the rare occasion permitted, tied to
the strings of a protestant bishop's apron, and
to have only such books of sound divinity as
1 Lansdowne MS., No. 155, foL 201.
2i2 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
the reformers delighted in, were unnecessary aggra-
vations.
The bishop did his best to convert the abbat,
for Elizabeth, it is said, ordered him to bring the
abbat, " being a man of learning and temper, to
acknowledge her supremacy and come to church."
But Cox wrote to Burghley, August 1578, and gives
this report of the abbat : " That he was a gentle per-
son ; but in popish religion too, too obdurate." And
that he had often conference with him : and other
learned men at his request had conferred with him
also touching going to church, and touching the
oath to the queen's majesty. The bishop added
that he had examined him whether the pope was
not a heretic . . . that when there was some hope
of his conformity he (the abbat) said unto himy
"All those things that he said against me with
leisure I could answer them." And further said,.
" That he was fully persuaded in his religion, which
he will stand to." " When I heard this," said the
bishop, " I gave him over and received him no
more to my table;" and in some zeal subjoining,
"Whether it be meet that the enemies of God
and the queen should be fostered in our homes
and not used according to the laws of the realm,
I leave to the judgement of others. What my
poor judgement is I will express, being commanded.
I think my house the worse being pestered with
such a guest." . . . This letter the bishop dates-
from Ely, styling it "that unsavoury isle with.
JOHN FECKNAM, ABB AT 213
turves and dried-up loads," the 29th of August
1578.1
The council on October 23, 1579, understanding
that Fecknam had " lately broken out into an open
discommending of her majesty's godly proceedings
in matters of religion," required Cox " to cause him
to be kept close prisoner in some fit room within his
house, not suffering him to have any man of his own
choice to attend upon him, and that such person as
his lordship shall appoint of his own servants to
resort unto him, to deliver him his necessary food
(which their lordships wish to be no larger than
may serve for his convenient sustenance)." 2
A so-called " confession " 3 exists in the Lans-
1 Strype's Annals (ed. 1824), vol. ii. Perne, the dean of Ely, had been
set on to Fecknam some months before Cox wrote to Burghley, and in
his turn writes on May n, 1578, to the effect that the abbat had said
of the Book of Common Prayer : " That as he liked well of prayers
therein that were made to Almighty God in the name of His Son, Jesus
Christ ; so he would also have added the invocation of our blessed Lady
and other saints and prayers for the dead" (ibid. pp. 176, 177, 186).
2 Acts of the Privy Council, vol. xi. p. 291.
3 Endorsed in Burghley's writing, " Feckehamis Confessio before the
bishop of Ely and his Chaplaines. Papists 1580." Two years earlier
Perne had writen to Burghley that it was impossible to get Fecknam to
sign this or a similar document. Burghley evidently wrote to Fecknam
about this confession, for Strype reports the abbat as writing in answer
words to the effect : " That he was persuaded of a singular good will
(he said) both that her majesty and his honour bore unto him, if he
should show himself anything conformable. That he thought verily
that were it not for her majesty and his honour, it would have been
worse for him and others of his sect than it was at that day ; for
the which he said, that he did daily pray for the long preservation of
her majesty, and also for his lordship's honourable state. But yet to
subscribe he did refuse ; saying that if he should subscribe and fail in
one thing, he had as good failed in all" (ibid. p. 180).
2i4 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
downe MSS.,1 which shows the pertinacity of his
jailors and his own constancy : —
" A True Note of Certain Articles confessed and
allowed by Mr. Dr. Fecknam, as well in
Christmas holidays last past as also at divers
other times before, by conference in learning
before the reverend father in God the L.
Bishop of Ely, and before Dr. Perne, Dean
of Ely, Master Nickolas, Master Stanton,
Master Crowe, Mr. Bowler, Chaplains to my
L. of Ely; and divers others whose names
be here subscribed.
" First, he doth believe in his conscience and
before God that the xiiii chapter of the first to the
Corinthians is as truly to be understanded of the
common service to be had in the mother tongue,
to be understanded of the vulgar people as of the
preaching and prophesying in the mother tongue.
" Secondly, that he doth find no fault with anything
that is set forth in the Book of Common Service
now used in the Church of England, but his desire
is to have all the rest of the old service that was
taken out to be restored again, as the prayer to the
saints and for the dead, and the seven sacraments
and external sacrifice, and then he would most will-
ingly come thereto. He liketh well to have the sacra-
ment ministered under both kinds unto the lay people,
so it were done by the authority of the Church.
1 No. 30, fol. 199.
JOHN FECKNAM, ABB AT 215
" Thirdly, he doth very well allow of the inter-
pretation of the oath for the queens majestie her
supremacy as it is interpreted in her highness in-
junctions, that is that the queen's majestie under
God have soveranty and rule over all manner of
persons born within her realms, dominions, and
countries, of what estate either ecclesiastical or
temporal soever they be ; the which oath he offereth
himself to be at all times ready most willingly to
receive whensoever it shall be demanded of him by
authority.
" Fourthly, he being demanded why he will not
come to the service in the Church of England as it
is set forth this day, seeing he doth find no fault
with it, and doth think it in his conscience that it
may be lawful to have the common prayer in the
mother tongue. He answereth, because he is not of
our Church for lack of unity ; some being therein
protestants, some puritans, and some of the family of
Love, and for that it is not set forth by the authority
of general council to avoid schisme.
" Lastly, Mr. D. Fecknam will not conform himself
to our religion, for that he can see nothing to be
sought but the spoil of the Church and of bishops'
houses and of college lands, which he saith maketh
many to pretend to be puritans, seeking for the
fruits of the church, and always requesting Almighty
God to put in her majesty's mind and her honour-
able council to make some good stay therein, other-
wise he saith it will bring in ignorance in her high-
216 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
ness' clergy, with a subversion of Christian religion,
and finally all wickedness and paganism.
(Signed) "John Fecknam, Priest.1
"BichardEly.
Andreas Perne.
Gulihelmus Stanton."
How well the abbat knew the temper of the times.
He would be willing to accept the Prayer-Book if it
ceased to be protestant. As regards disciplinary
laws he was free to hold his own opinion as to their
utility, but he denied the Church of England was an
authority with power to make such changes as had
been made. He saw plainly the state of schism the
established church was in, and that alone was proof
to him that it was outside the unity of his church.
He would not object to an oath expressed in the
terms explained in the queen's injunction ; but the
oath that had actually to be tendered to him under
the act of Parliament, he would not take at all on
any understanding whatsoever as to its implied
meaning. There is in this confession always a
saving " but " to every approach to an agreement
with the reformers, and it was just these exceptions
that made the " Confession" useless to them.
In June 1580 Cox writes a piteous letter to
Burghley.2 He is ill and has paralysis, and cannot
1 It is signed in a very feeble and shaky handwriting.
2 " To take one view more of the ancient, pious, learned confessor
and bishop Cox, which take from his own pen to his old friend, the
lord Burley ; complaining of two evils that now oppress him in his very
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT 217
put up with the abbat any longer, and begs that he
may be taken away. The truth is that the angli-
can bishops were worn out with the quiet but
unconquerable constancy of men who entrenched
themselves absolutely behind the invisible but all-
powerful barriers of conscience. It was an open
rebuke to them in the face of the whole kingdom ;
for not one of these had they succeeded in bring-
ing over to the new religion. Parker, as we have
seen, was only following the current when he was
anxious to cut the difficulty by enforcing the
oath, the refusal of which meant death. Jewel,
too, had been hinting at the use of the sword in
confidential intercourse with his friends, regretting
that this means was not used upon these irrecon-
cilables. And Aylmer had written in 1577 to the
lord treasurer : "I speak to your lordship as
one chiefly careful for the state, and to use more
severity than hitherto hath been used ; or else we
shall smart for it." l The unholy blood-thirst, we
cannot call it anything else, displayed by the new
bishops excited the anger of Elizabeth. Bernadino
old age : one might have a redress by favour of that lord ; the other
only from God. Thus writing Duo mala me premunt, the one, hospes
mains et inutilis ; i.e. a bad guest and good for nothing. He meant
Fecknam, sometime abbat of Westminster, that had been committed to
his house and had remained there so long till he was weary of him.
. . . The other inconvenience . . . corpus nimirum dimidia parte
languidum, his poor paralytic body" (Strype, Annals of the Reformation,
ed. 1824, vol. ii. Part II. p. 381).
1 Strype, Life of Bishop Aylmer, p. 24. Cox, writing in 1578, says :
" I trust hereafter her highness and her magistrates will prosecute
severely the same trade" (Annals, p. 196).
218 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
de Mendoza, the Spanish ambassador, writing to his
king, March 23, 1580, says: "This (the armament)
has caused her recently to revoke the commission
given to her bishops to ascertain who were catho-
lics. She told them with her own mouth that they
were a set of scamps, for they were oppressing
the catholics more than she desired." x
As a consequence of Cox's appeal, at the end of
the month (June 24) the council gave leave that
Fecknam should be transferred from the bishop's
immediate neighbourhood. So sometime in July
the abbat was once more moved ; this time to Wis-
beach Castle, a disused and partly ruinous house
belonging to the bishop of Ely. Here he met
several of his old fellow-prisoners, bishop Watson
among the others.
Wisbeach Castle was a dreary place. "During
the winter the sea mists drifting landwards almost
always hung over and hid the castle walls. Broad
pools and patches of stagnant waters, green with
rank weeds, and wide marshes and sterile flats lay
outspread all round for miles. The muddy river
was constantly overflowing its broken-down banks,
so that the moat of the castle constantly flooded
the adjacent garden and orchard. Of foliage, save
a few stunted willow-trees, there was little or none
in sight ; for when summer came round, the sun's
heat soon parched up the rank grass in the court-
yard, and without, the dandelion and snapdragon
1 Calendar Spanish State Papers (Simancas), vol. i. p. 22.
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT 219
which grew upon its massive but dilapidated
walls."1
Such was Wisbeach, a place which in a few years
more was to gain so sad a notoriety as the theatre
of dissensions which, it is no exaggeration to say,
inflicted a blow upon Catholicity in England the
effects of which are felt even to-day. But while the
benedictine abbat was there, his gentle spirit sorted
well with the fraternal charity which possessed the
hearts of his fellow-confessors. There was no emula-
tion, no prelature. Even Watson would not accept
of any superiority on account of his episcopal dignity.
They were all fellow-prisoners, he said, all equal.2
The life passed a few years later in this prison is
described by Fr. Weston, the Jesuit, in his account
of his imprisonment.3 The prisoners were kept in
separate rooms under bolts and locks. Dinner and
supper they had in common ; and for half-an-hour
before and after the meals they could take exercise
in the open air. Wisbeach was then a public prison,
common to all thieves and criminals. After the
time of Fecknam the prisoners seem to have had
more liberty, as we shall see in the next chapter.
But when the abbat first came there the system was
in all its rigour. There is a letter from the keepers of
1 F. G. Lee, The Church under Queen Elizabeth, ed. 1892, p. 198.
Among the state papers is a document of July 1579, as to the evil
state of the river at the time. P.B.O. Dom Eliz., vol. cxxxi., No. 48.
2 Bridgett and Knox, p. 204.
3 Morris' The Troubles of our Catholic Forefathers, second series, pp.
239, 240.
22o THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
Wisbeach, George Carleton and Humphrey Michell,
to the Privy Council (Oct 16, 1580),1 in which they
report the recusants as being eight in number.
"The bishop of Ely has appointed a preacher, Dr.
William Fulke, a puritan; but the prisoners refuse
to attend his sermons or prayers, saying that they
are not of our church, and they will neither hear,
pray, nor yet confer with us of any matter concerning
religion.,, The keepers mention that, according to
instructions they had received, all books " saving the
canonical scriptures and the allowed writers " have
been taken away from the prisoners, to the great
grief of their hearts. They end up by asking
whether the permission of taking meals in com-
mon may be withdrawn.
This durance did not extinguish Fecknam's bene-
volence nor his desire of doing good all round.
Here, at Wisbeach, he paid for the repairing of the
road, and also erected a public market-cross in the
town.2 But the life of this venerable confessor was
drawing to a close. Worn out with the rigours of
an imprisonment of twenty-three years,3 he died a
1 Bridgett and Knox, p. 197.
2 Stevens, p. 289. " And there was also a cross, probably dedicated
to St. Peter, which was afterwards converted into an obelisk . . . [but
was] taken down in the year 1810" (History of Wisbeach [1883], p. 258).
8 In the poem before mentioned, the unknown author says : —
" Fama refert igitur quod dira venena dabantur ;
Fecknamo ; neque res suspicione caret."
He also mentions that the abbat was consoled before death with the
JOHN FECKNAM, ABBAT 221
martyr for his faith in 1584, and on October 16 was
buried in an unknown grave in the parish church of
Wisbeach.
Abbat Fecknam, says Stevens, was of " a mean
stature, somewhat fat, round-faced, beautiful and of
a pleasant aspect, affable and lively in conversa-
tion." 1 Camden calls him a man learned and good,
who lived a long time and gained the affection
of his adversaries by publicly deserving well of the
poor.2 Bishop Kennet mentions as a trait in the
abbat's character that he " left what he had to the
church at Westminster, and gave the dean good
directions about such lands leased out, which could
not otherwise have been easily discovered, in letters
which are still preserved among the records." !
To the last he never forgot Westminster, and,
as was characteristic with him, the poor of West-
minster. From the overseer's accounts of the parish
of St. Margaret's is recorded, 1590: " Over and
besides the sum of forty pounds given by John
Fecknam, sometime abbat of Westminster, for a
stock to buy wood for the poor of Westminster, and
to sell two faggots for a penny, and seven billets
for a penny, which sum of forty pounds doth remain
Holy Viaticum, and said when the Blessed Sacrament was brought
to him : —
" Tu bona cuncta mihi tecum sapienter portas
Tu letitia es, tu mihi vita, salus."
1 Ibid.
2 Annates Rerum Anglicarum, ed. Hearne, vol. i. p. 48.
3 Lansdowne MS., No. 982, fol. 62.
222 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
in the hands of the church- wardens." 1 He also left
a bequest to the poor of his first monastic home of
Evesham.2
According to Anthony & Wood, Fecknam, with
the benedictine instinctive love for the Office, wrote
a commentary on the Psalms of David, and also
one on the Canticles. Among the Sloane MSS. is
an autograph work of about 400 pages bearing the
following heading : —
" This booke of sovereigne medicines against the
most common and knowne diseases both of men and
women was by good proofe and long experiences
collected by Mr. Dr. Fecknam, late abbat of West-
minster, and that chiefly for the poor, which hath
not att all tymes the learned phisitions att hande." 3
Thus in the odour of sanctity lived and died John
Fecknam, the last abbat of the monastery of St.
Peter's at Westminster. A true monk and a staunch
witness for the faith of Christ.4
1 These accounts have been privately printed. Westminster, 1877.
See also Malcolm's Londinium Redivivum, vol. iv. pp. 139, 140.
2 May's History of Evesham, p. 398.
s Add. MSS., No. 3919.
4 Among bishop Kennet's collection in the Lansdowne MSS. (No.
982) are some notes in addition to Anthony a Wood's notice of
Fecknam. From them we gather that in 1556 Fecknam resigned the
deanery of St. Paul's in the January ; the living of Kentish Town was
voided November 22, and that of Greenford Magna December 7, "per
religionis ingressum magistri Johis Feckenham cleric, in mon. S. Petri
Westmon. noviter erecti " (from Bonner's Register). Among the pensions
recorded in the year 1555 Com. Wigorn. Evesham. Pensio Johs Fecken-
ham, Decani D. Pauli, x libr.
CHAPTER X
THE STATE OF ENGLISH CATHOLICS, 1559-1601
The immediate effect of tendering the oath of
supremacy was the deprivation of all the bishops,
15 in number, with the exception of Kitchin of
Llandaff. They were followed by 7 deans, 10 arch-
deacons, 7 chancellors, 25 heads of colleges, $j
fellows, 35 prebendaries, 44 doctors and professors,
17 heads of schools or religious houses, 197 digni-
taries and men of weight.1 This by no means com-
pletes the list of deprivations. The number of
parochial clergy that were either gradually deprived
or gave up of their own accord is numbered by
competent judges as something like 2000.2 It is
only by some great exodus like this that the great
dearth of clergy, of which the new Elizabethan
1 See a list (avowedly incomplete) printed in Tierney, vol. ii.,
Appendix.
2 "In the visitation of the province of York in August and
September 1559, out of 90 clergymen summoned, 21 came and took
the oath, 36 came and refused to swear, 17 were absent without
proctors, 16 were absent with proctors. ... In the province of Canter-
bury . . . out of the 891 1 parishes and 9400 beneficed clergymen, we
find only 806 subscribers, while all the bishops and 85 others expressly
refused to subscribe, and the rest were absentees.' See R. Simpson's
Campion, ed. 1896, p. 197.
224 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
bishops were constantly complaining, can be ac-
counted for. Of those who remained in outward
union with the Anglican Church there were great
numbers we know who kept to their livings in the
hopes of another change, looking forward "to a
time," as it was said. They had already seen so
many variations within the last twenty years, why
not keep quiet and wait for better days ? So many
argued, and would, at least in country parts, say
mass privately for those of their parishioners who
were of their mind, and then would perform the
new rite publicly in the parish church to fulfil the
law. Most of these, by thus tampering with their
consciences, at last fell away entirely. But of that
large body of clergy known as the "Old Priests," or
the " Marian Priests," some few retired for a while to
the universities and thence went abroad to Rome,
Louvain, Douai, Paris, &c. Others were received
into private families, where they acted as chaplains
and attended in secret the catholics who would not
admit the ministrations of the new clergy. They
were not molested as a rule, for many of those who
kept to their livings were friends and secretly
admired their constancy.
This, then, was the state of the Church in England
in a few years after Elizabeth's accession. The
bishops were in prison, and a large body of clergy
was scattered here and there and left without head
or organisation. The sacrament of confirmation
ceased ; and it became difficult even to get the
THE STATE OF ENGLISH CATHOLICS 225
holy oils for extreme unction. These had to be
smuggled over from Ireland or the continent. Some-
times, at rare intervals, an Irish bishop would come
over in secret and try to supply the more pressing
wants of the district he visited. But practically Eliza-
beth had achieved her end. She wanted to crush all
opposition and deprive of place, power, and influence
those who would not allow of her religious policy.
The desperate state of the church was brought
under the notice of the Roman authorities, and
steps were proposed (which, alas ! came to nought)
to apply a remedy. Among the letters of cardinal
Morone de rebus anglisB (written between July 1560
and September 1563) is a proposal for a new arrange-
ment of the English sees.1 Heath was to be trans-
lated from York to Canterbury, Watson from Lincoln
to York, and Scott from Chester to Durham. The
others were to retain their sees ; and names were
proposed for filling up the vacant ones. There was
no idea of submitting quietly to the intruders, and
thus tacitly admitting their claim. Had this policy
prevailed in England as it did in Ireland, we to-day
should have been in possession of our old historical
hierarchy.
What hindered the project has not yet fully ap-
peared. But it can be sufficiently accounted for.
Twice did the pope (Pius IV.) send ambassadors to
1 Episcopal Successions (M. Brady), vol. ii. p. 322. This must have
been written before it was known that Heath and the others were im-
prisoned.
VOL. I. P
226 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
the queen assuring her he would give every satisfac-
tion. But the envoys were refused admittance into
the kingdom.1 When this conciliatory pontiff died,
he was succeeded (1566) by a pope of very different
policy. Pius V., a dominican friar, of stern and in-
flexible ideas, was determined to crush the queen by
the censure of the church, and to impose by force of
arms the recognition of a temporal headship, which
an united Christendom had, of free will, given to his
predecessors. Had the Curia recognised that the
political world was indeed moving, the history of the
church in England would have been very different.
But easy enough as it is for us to see the errors of a
past time, it was not so easy for those then at the
helm to divine the trend of affairs. A pope is neces-
sarily influenced by his entourage ; and the temporal
policy of one pope will not necessarily be that of
his predecessors. The government of the church is
vested in human hands, which are moved by human
hearts swayed by every manner of human motives.2
1 May 5, 1560, the pope wrote to Elizabeth asking her to receive
Vincent Parpaglia, abbat of St. Saviour's, as 'persona grata to the queen.
But he was stopped at Calais. The pope renewed his attempt the next
year, and sent abbat Martinengo, who got as far as Brussels, and there
received notice that he too was refused admittance into the kingdom.
As neither was allowed to fulfil his embassy, it is not possible to say,
with the means at present at our disposal, what were the terms of the
papal message. Any reports as to the pope's willingness to accept the
changes introduced by the queen, are mere valueless conjectures.
2 In a letter of Bernardo Navagero, Venetian ambassador at Borne,
to the doge and senate (March 14, 1556), he says : "Yesterday I had
audience of the pope, who said to me ... * It is a miracle, lord ambas-
sador, how this holy see has maintained itself, preceding pontiffs having,
THE STATE OF ENGLISH CATHOLICS 227
But Providence, while leaving men to work out their
own measures and to take the consequences of their
own acts, overrules all for its own predestined end.
We shall be better able to understand the action
of Pius V. in regard to Elizabeth, if we remember
that he was brought up and was surrounded by men
imbued with a tradition of universal sovereignty
even in temporal matters. It was one of long stand-
ing. What was more natural, when Christendom
was united by the bonds of one faith, than to look
up to the pope as to the common father and head
of all kingdoms ; as the arbitrator in all disputes,
between king and king and also between king and
subjects? But that which was the free concession
of a loving flock, in course of time became to be
regarded by some as a divine right. It was held
and publicly taught by many that the pope had, by
a right inherent in his pastoral office, the power of
deposing monarchs and of releasing subjects from
their allegiance — even more, of transferring their
allegiance to whomsoever he pleased to give the
forfeited crown. The church of course was not com-
mitted to this doctrine ; but it formed in those days
a very important element in practical teaching and
in the run of men's thoughts ; just as in the
thoughts of other people who abhorred the pope it
was held that there was a divine or a natural right
one may say, done everything to destroy it ; but it is founded on such
stones that there is nothing to fear " {Calendar of State Papers (Venetian),
vol. vi. No. 425).
228 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
in temporal princes to dictate the religion of their
subjects according to the formula cujus regio ejus
religio. The Curia saw England slipping away ;
that England which, if of late the cause of much
trouble, was yet " a very garden of delights." Fears
were entertained that other nations, too, would
follow in her wake. So an example must be made
of the English queen. A judicial inquiry into
her case was begun in Eome and resulted in a
declaration that she had incurred all the canonical
penalties of heresy. A bull Regnans in Excelsis
was issued on February 25, 1570, which denounced
her as excommunicated. But when it goes on to
declare her deprived of her "pretended" right to
the crown, and to absolve all her subjects from their
allegiance, and moreover to proclaim excommuni-
cated all who henceforth presumed to obey her laws
or acknowledge her as queen, there was an assertion
here of a temporal right which could only result in
deadly resistance.
The effects were disastrous. The queen was
driven to desperation. Against the determination
of the man was pitted the obstinacy of an infuriated
and unscrupulous woman. Though she affected to
treat the sentence of deprivation with contempt, yet
she knew not what complications might ensue. The
excommunication, of which she knew the spiritual
force, wounded her also to the quick, and she
endeavoured to get the stigma removed. The pope
was inflexible. The bull was received with dismay
THE STATE OF ENGLISH CATHOLICS 229
by the English catholics, who could only fear from
it a fresh excuse for ill treatment. While they were
proving their loyalty as no other nation has ever
done to the pope's divine right, the verities of the
catholic religion, they felt it hard indeed to be
called upon to be implicated in temporal matters,
based as they were upon grounds which, even in
catholic kingdoms, were held at least to be ques-
tionable. The English catholics were thus ground
down between the upper and the nether millstones.
The queen's answer to the bull was an act of
Parliament cutting off all communication between
her subjects and Kome, and declaring traitors all who
denied her title. Another made it treason to use or
procure any bull from Kome, or to reconcile or be
reconciled, to have in possession any objects blessed
by the pope, or even to maintain or harbour any
offenders against the act. The pope, on his side,
was determined to enforce his bull, and called upon
Christian kings to invade England. To this period
belong the many plots, real or feigned, with which
the queen was threatened.1 In after years the
1 That there were real plots 011 the part of some catholics against the
queen cannot to-day be denied ; nor that churchmen were unfortu-
nately mixed up in them. On May 2, 1583, the papal nuncio writes
from Paris to the cardinal of Como : " The duke of Guise and duke
of Mayenne have told me that they have a plan for killing the queen
of England by the hand of a catholic, though not one outwardly, who
is near her person, and is ill affected towards her for having put to
death some of his catholic relations. This man, it seems, sent word to
the queen of Scotland, but she refused to attend to it. . . . The duke
asks for no assistance from our lord [the pope] in the affair. ... As
to putting to death that wicked woman, I said to him, that I will not
230 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
Armada appeared (doubtlessly rather than was) the
result of the pope's appeal. The immediate effect
of the bull was to widen the breach between
England and the holy see. It was the devoted
English catholics who felt all the weight of the
papal bull, and saw with dismay a still trembling
scale sent down with a violent impetus in a direc-
tion contrary to catholicity. During this time of
open rupture the one thought that was uppermost
at Rome seems to have been to crush the queen.
There was now no more talk of sending over
bishops, and the flock was left to itself. Meanwhile
" the old priests " were either leaving the country
or were dying out. It was an Englishman who
first came to the rescue of the unhappy catholics in
England by starting the seminary at Douai in Flan-
ders to provide priests for the English mission.
William Allen, an exile himself, in 1568 invited
some of the Oxford and Cambridge men scattered
over France and Flanders to unite with him in
forming a small establishment at Douai. Several
came at his call, and a house was bought. The
benedictine abbats of the neighbouring monasteries
of Arras (St. Vedast), Marchienne, and Anchin,
contributed generously to the undertaking, and
write about it to our lord pope (nor do I), nor tell your most illus-
trious lordship to inform him of it ; because, though I believe our lord
the pope would be glad that God should punish in any way whatsoever
that enemy of His, still it would be unfitting that His vicar should
procure it by these means " (Knox's Historical Introduction to Letters
and Memorials of William, Cardinal Allen, pp. 46, 47).
THE STATE OF ENGLISH CATHOLICS 231
helped to support the great number who flocked
in as soon as the doors were opened. Soon there
were 150 persons gathered at Douai under the
presidency of Allen. But he had no fixed means of
support for his new college. Pius V. had indeed
applauded his work and encouraged him to go on :
but it was not until 1575, in the third year of
Gregory XIII., that any substantial help came from
the holy see. In that year Allen determined to go
to Eome to beg for assistance ; and the good abbats
gave him strong letters of recommendation, in which
the university of Douai joined. His journey was
successful: and the pope, it is said at the special
entreaty of Mercurianus, the general of the Jesuits,
gave the college a moderate yearly allowance. The
king of Spain, to whose dominion Douai then be-
longed, also gave them an annual pension.
A few years after, at the instigation of Owen
Lewis, afterwards bishop of Cassano, the pope about
1578 opened, near St. Peter's, a similar college
in Eome, and placed it under the charge of Dr.
Maurice Clenock, then warden of the old English
hospital. In 1579 the two institutions were united.
Two Italian Jesuit fathers were employed; one as
procurator, the other as prefect, to help on the new
establishment. But after a year a rebellion broke
out among the students. A strong party began to
clamour for the expulsion of the president, and the
introduction of Jesuits as superiors. Without going
into the reasons which led up to this emeute, it will
232 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
be sufficient to state that Dr. Maurice Clenock was
removed ; and the direction of the college success-
fully passed into the hands of the society under the
headship of Fr. Alphonso Agazzari.
We now come to consider a painful page in our
history, a page which is however fraught with deep
lessons. It was a bitter experience. We should
have been tempted to pass it by ; but, as Fr. John
Morris, S.J., says —
"At this distance of time, and after this happy
lull in the controversy, we can afford to look at the
whole dispute with greater impartiality, and not feel
it necessary to say that all that was done on one
side was right, and all that was done on the other
was wrong." 1
Moreover, we think more harm than good is done
by catholic writers who entirely pass over the matter,
for the story is known outside the church. Surely
it is wisdom to see that mistakes, and grave mistakes,
too, have been made by good, zealous people. We
profit by their failings. We also get a wider and
truer view of life and history by looking these ques-
tions full in the. face ; and by ever remembering
that men are men, and that human nature has to
be taken into account in all things and at all times.
Moreover, unless the real case in point be stated,
history becomes unintelligible. And the lessons,
which Providence has allowed, must be for our
benefit, if we know how to use them : for Truth is
1 See Dublin Review, April 1890, p. 255.
THE STATE OF ENGLISH CATHOLICS 233
always edifying in the true sense of the word. It
is therefore necessary to sketch the events which
lead up to the troubles and their subsequent
history. We have no case to plead, but only a
plain story to tell. And in the telling we shall
follow the method Lingard professes in the preamble
to his history —
" To admit no statement on trust ; to weigh with
care the value of the authorities on which I rely ;
and to watch with jealousy the secret workings of
my own personal feelings and prepossessions." *
At the very time Henry VIII. was engaged in his
nefarious work of suppressing the monasteries, St.
Ignatius Loyola, a Spaniard, was engaged in laying
the foundation of his society. In 1537 he went,
with fi.ve companions, before Paul III. for his bless-
ing. The pope, three years after, gave his solemn
approval of the new institute. Its members were
at first restricted to sixty in number ; but such was
their startling success, that, by 1608 the new men
were already possessed of 293 colleges, 123 houses,
and formed an army of 10,581 devoted men.2 Started
at a desperate emergency, they flung themselves into
the breach, and changed a threatened disaster into
victory. They took possession, so to say, of the
catholic world. Universities, colleges, pulpits, and
confessionals were peopled with the new religious.
1 Preliminary notice to the History of England, ed. 1849, p. xxi.
2 See also Ribadeneira's The Life of B. Father Ignatius, ed. 16 16,
PP- 327, 328.
234 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
The fame of the great St. Francis Xavier, one of
Ignatius' first companions, cast a glory upon them as
missioners. In every department of learning, their
men were acknowledged masters ; and the number of
their admirers was enormous. They were, of set pur-
pose, the apostles of the rich and influential. And
this, besides giving them the disposal of boundless
wealth, also initiated them into the secrets of courts,
and made of them, whether they sought for it or not,
a power to be reckoned with in the state. Their
device, " All to the greater- glory of God," if it was
the secret of their brilliant success, was also un-
doubtedly the cause of many difficulties. Some, who
had not gained by their religious training that width
of mind which makes the perfect religious, came to
accept their own society as the one hope for the
regeneration of a fallen world ; and their sole and
solitary aim, the object of their lives, the end of
each day's occupation, being the promotion of what
they conceived to be the greater glory of God, this,
they concluded, could not but be promoted by the
advancement of their society. Taking a broad view
of their action, this really seems to have been with
them a practical, though perhaps not a reasoned con-
viction. Unfortunately it was so in some of the more
prominent of those who had secured the direction
of English affairs. This, it seems, is a position war-
ranted by facts, and is the only key to the situation.
But looking at the matter calmly, is it any wonder
if it were so ? Success so complete, so sudden, so
THE STATE OF ENGLISH CATHOLICS 235
well-deserved and so brilliant, as that which befell
the Jesuits, is rarely given to any body of men. Was
it, then, we say, any wonder that some might have
become intoxicated therewith, and carried away to
the point of making a means an end? They cer-
tainly had no warrant in their rule for their con-
duct ; and one cannot help feeling that their
superiors, in not checking the dabblers in politics,
secular and spiritual, brought on in later years a
heavy retribution.
It was at this time, when the fame of the society
was at its height, that, in reply to Allen's repeated
request, the general of the Jesuits promised, to send
some of his English subjects to help in the mission
field which had already become one of death.1 In
the spring of 1580 the first two Jesuit missioners
set out for England, and arrived in the June follow-
ing. The two were Robert Parsons 2 and Edmund
Campion. As these two were typical of the currents
1 When Pole was restoring the church in England, the Jesuits
suggested to him " that whereas the queen was restoring the goods of
the church that were in her hands, there was but little purpose to raise
up the old foundations ; for the benedictine order was become rather
a clog than a help to the church : they therefore desired that those
houses should be assigned to them for maintaining schools and semi-
naries which they should set on quickly," &c. (Burnett, History of the
Reformation, ed. Oxford, 1865, vol. ii. p. 526. Taken from a Venetian
manuscript.) St. Ignatius wrote a beautiful letter to Pole, January 24,
1555, speaking of the desire he had of saving souls in this realm. See
Epist. Card. Poli., vol. v. p. 117; and More's Historia Provincial Anglicaim
S.J., p. 11.
2 Kobert Persons or Parsons was born at Nether Stowey, near Bridge-
water, in Somerset, in the year 1 546. He received his education from
the vicar of the parish, who sent him to Oxford in 1564. Two years
236 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
which then began to flow from the society we must
sketch their characters, and do not believe we can
do better than by quoting the masterly analysis given
by the late Mr. K. Simpson in his Life of Campion.
He says the protestants describe Parsons as the
"lurking wolf," and Campion as "the wandering
vagrant." And goes on —
" There was more truth in this colouring than in
the subsequent notion which Camden promulgated,
that Parsons was a violent and fierce-natured man,
while Campion was of a sweet disposition and
good breeding ; the first seditious, turbulent, and
confident ; the other modest in all things except his
challenge.1
"Campion, it seems to me, was the quick-tem-
pered man, open, free, generous, hot, enthusiastic
yet withal modest, gentle, and fair. Parsons more
slow, subtle, cool, calculating, and capable of ex-
later he entered Balliol College. He took his degree of M.A. in 1572,
and became fellow of his college and then bursar and dean. He was
also a noted tutor. He went abroad intending to become a physician ;
but falling in with a Jesuit he became a catholic, and joined their order
July 4, 1575. He was made rector of the English college in Borne
1587, and again after his return from Spain. He died April 15, 1610.
He was of middle size, swarthy complexion, strong featured, and of
somewhat forbidding appearance. But he was agreeable in manners
and had powers of conversation. His friends claim that his mind was
penetrating, his judgment solid and well regulated, and that he was
calm in consultation and patient under disappointments. He was a
great reader, and a master of an emphatic style of controversy.
1 This refers to a challenge Campion wrote offering to dispute with
any one a certain number of priests. The paper was committed to the
care of a friend, to be produced only under certain circumstances.
But it was prematurely published.
THE STATE OF ENGLISH CATHOLICS 237
hibiting either violence or modesty as the occasion
seemed to demand. If Campion had the wisdom,
Parsons had the prudence. The first knew how to
move, the other to guide ; one, if I may use offen-
sive terms without offence, had the gifts which
make an agitator ; and the other those that make
a conspirator. The rules of the Jesuits, as I have
shown above, linked together characters thus dis-
similar in order that united they might act with
more force and more completeness. And this would
have been the case if their function had been all in
common ; but though the men were linked together
they had separate work to perform. As their in-
structions directed them to use the lay members of
the confraternity to prepare the preliminaries of
conversion and then themselves to finish the work,
so in this work of finishing there were different
grades ; for it is one thing to be a thorough catholic,
and it is something beyond to take part in the
pope's intentions and desires, and to devote oneself
to their furtherance and fulfilment.1 The instruc-
tions sufficient to make a man a catholic are not
sufficient to make him an ultramontane. Campion
thought that all was done when he had reconciled
his convert to the catholic church, and taught him
the faith and made him partaker of the sacraments.
Parsons looked further ; he desired and laboured for
the conversion of England, and he thought nothing
1 Mr. Simpson is to be understood, of course, as referring to the papal
secular policy.
238 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
could effect this but the overthrow of Elizabeth ;
therefore his aim was the organisation of a party on
which he could rely when the pope gave the signal
for the attack. But there was no reason for him to
blab of this design. The seed sown would, he
thought, grow all the stronger for not being pre-
maturely forced. It thus happened that there was
not always perfect community between the Jesuit
missionaries ; a polarity began to declare itself, as
it afterwards did in the society at large, sending off
those like Campion to fight under the banner of
St. Francis Xavier against heathenism, whilst it
retained those like Parsons in Europe to direct the
consciences of princes, and to influence the councils
of state." 1
When they arrived in England,2 there were already
here some four-score seminary priests who had been
trained either in Eome or Douai, besides a number
of the old Marian clergy. These latter knew but
too well the position of the country ; they had ac-
quired that knowledge in a bitter school. The
enthusiasm of youth was passed ; and they were
contented for the most part, perhaps, at this time
of day, too well contented, to regard things as they
were, not as they would have wished them to be.
Hence they looked rather askance at the new ways
1 K. Simpson, Edmund Campion (1896), pp. 275, 276.
2 Parsons landed at Dover on June 11, 1580, disguised "in a
captain's uniform of buff trimmed with gold lace, with hat and feathers
to match." Campion followed on the 25th, and passed himself off
as a merchant of jewels. The disguises were characteristic of the men.
THE STATE OF ENGLISH CATHOLICS 239
and new ideas of these men who were flocking into
England from the seminaries ; and above all upon
the Jesuits, who from their very founder were de-
voted to the Spanish policy. It was feared, more-
over, that these two men would introduce a politi-
cal influence under the guise of religion. How
well in this the "old priests" forecasted the event,
history tells.
When Parsons and Campion arrived in London,
July 1580, they were met by certain representatives
of the secular clergy who told them plainly their
fears. Parsons assured them they had no political
object in view; that they came only "to treat of
religion in truth and simplicity, and to attend to the
gaining of souls without any pretence or knowledge
of matters of state." * The general had given them
special instructions, and directly forbidden them
even to discuss such matters. Parsons told them
this, and said —
" Not that we would have meddled in these matters
if it had not been forbidden us ; but we wish that by
making public the general's charge we may prevent
all who are informed of it from starting such dis-
courses in future." 2
1 Edmund Campion, p. 183.
2 " Those instructions, says Fr. Morris, S. J., were intended to be
strictly secret, and they were not kept secret. They were meant to be
obeyed, and Father Parsons at first, and blessed Edmund Campion to
the end of his short career, obeyed them. It would have been good for
religion if Fr. Parsons had continued to obey them, and his superiors
to enforce them. But for a time he was busily engaged in Spain acting
in the very teeth of them" (Dublin Review, April 1890, p. 251).
240 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
The fears of the secular clergy were allayed and the
Jesuits made very welcome as helpers in the mission
field. But soon Parsons threw obedience to the
winds and began political intrigues. He could not
resist it. His mind was filled with the vision of the
regaining of England by force of arms, and he felt
he must prepare the way for that. The Armada was
talked about abroad as a certainty ; ' the ground
must be prepared here. With all the energy of his
impetuous nature he adopted, solely, we think, from
the conviction that he was thereby advancing God's
greater glory, the dangerous rdle of a conspirator in
the hope of helping on the restoration of England
to the holy see or of dying a martyr in the cause.
But he had misjudged his means. Within a year
Campion, the brave and chivalrous missioner, was
the martyr. And Parsons fled away, in prudence
1 It is instructive to find Parsons, while engaged in the tangles of
politics, being himself duped by those he served. Philip II. wrote thus
on February n, 1587, to Count Olivares : "You will maintain Allen
and Kobert (Parsons) in faith and hopefulness that the recovery of
their country will really be attempted in order that they may the more
zealously and earnestly employ the good offices which may be expedient
with the pope ; but let it be in such a way that they do not think the
affair is so near at hand as that it will make them expansive in com-
municating it to others of their nation for their comfort and consola-
tion, and so cause it to become public, for this is the way in which
during these past years many things which were well begun for the
benefit of that kingdom have come to nought. Go on, then, counter-
balancing and drawing profit from them ; and in everything do as you
are accustomed with just prudence and dexterity according to what
the affair requires ; and I confide it to you, and you will inform me of
what is done." See Knox's Introduction to Letters and Memorials of
William, Cardinal Allen, p. lxxxvi.
THE STATE OF ENGLISH CATHOLICS 241
it has been called, to the continent, never again to
put his neck in jeopardy on English soil.
Father Parsons could never more resist the attrac-
tion of politics. His life henceforth was devoted
to intrigue. Eestless and untiring, he wandered
up and down the continent exerting directly or
indirectly, for the one end in view, all his vast
powers of organisation and leadership. He obtained
the foundation of seminaries for secular priests,
which he placed under the direction of the fathers
of the society, at Valladolid (1589), Lisbon, and
Seville (1592); and also founded a college for lay
youths at St. Omers (1594). With his influence at
the Spanish court, whose interests he was always
labouring to advance, he got pensions for these
houses. He collected alms from the nobility for
the same purpose, and also for helping the English
exiles. This command over money gave him great
power and influence with his countrymen abroad ;
and his words came to be looked upon as so many
oracles. He wrote treatises, political and spiritual ;
he was the adviser upon English affairs at Kome,
especially after the death of cardinal Allen (1594);
and in fact his opinion seemed to be at one time all
powerful. Everything was done through him and
according to his views. It is extraordinary to think
of the wonderful influence one man could exert
over superiors, and that he, a religious, not a states-
man, should as irresponsible be allowed to hold
the threads of a hundred affairs in his own hands.
vol. I. Q
242 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
What were the results as we see them ? His in-
trigues were failures ; the monopoly he laboured at
such cost to create was destroyed ; and he did more
than any other man to create an ill feeling among
Englishmen towards his order. Blackwell, who
afterwards became the first arch-priest, lamented
his coming into England, saying : —
" The President of Rheims x played a very indis-
creet part to send him hither, as being an unfit man
to be employed in the cause of religions." 2 His
political ventures, and the way in which he proposed
first one and then another as successor to the Eng-
lish throne, could not but excite the amusement of
the Eomans. Pasquino tells Marforio, " If there will
be any man that will buy the kingdom of England
let him repair to a merchant in a black square cap
in the city, and he shall have a very good penny-
worth thereof." It was well enough for the Eomans
to laugh at Parsons' schemes and projections. But
in England our forefathers had to suffer for them.
His plan, which seems to have developed into
a fixed and orderly purpose, was that his society
should have the glory of regaining England to the
faith. He, without doubt, honestly believed that
1 Allen had been obliged to remove his college from Douai in 1578
to Bheims, on account of reports adverse to his loyalty to Spain, which
were found afterwards to have been spread by the emissaries of queen
Elizabeth. The college remained at Eheims till 1599, when it returned
to Douai.
2 A Sparing Discoverie, by W. W., 1601, p. 45. Dr. Ely, in his
Certaine Briefe Notes, mentions the same opinion of Blackwell.
THE STATE OF ENGLISH CATHOLICS 243
the Jesuits could do so, and also that they alone
could do so. For that end, accordingly, he was
convinced that they must have full control over all
ecclesiastical affairs in this country. He impressed
this upon his men, and there were some who openly
avowed it. More does not hesitate to write : —
" Perhaps even these missions might with greater
propriety and greater convenience (let not the ex-
pression offend) be entrusted to members of our
society than to other men." x
Parsons, in the plan he drew up for the reorgani-
sation of the English Church which was hoped for
upon the success of the Armada, takes measures to
exclude from England all who would interfere with
the monopoly he was so carefully planning for the
greater glory of God as he understood it. The
benedictines, it was true, were the old apostles of
England ; the Jesuits, under his guidance, should
now have the glory of recovering the land to the
Faith.2 When in 1596-7 the students of the Eng-
lish secular college at Rome were petitioning the
pope to remove the Jesuits from the control over
the house, he hurried to the Eternal City and
" undertook to oppose the prayer and to assign the
reasons for its rejection. The society, he assured
the pontiff, was essential to the existence of religion
1 Historia Provincial Anglicance Societatis Jesu collectore Henrico Moro
(1660), p. 152.
2 See Memorial for the Reformation of England, by K. P., 1596, Part I.
chaps, vi., viii.
244 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
in the country. To the laity its members were
necessary, to counsel, to strengthen, and to protect
them ; to the clergy to support, to correct, and to
restrain them. Already the latter, by their vices
and their apostacy, had become objects of aversion1
or of distrust to the catholics. Were the fathers
to be removed, the people would be left without
advisers, the clergy without guides ; the salt would
be taken from the earth, and the sun would be
blotted from the hearers of the English Church." 2
With such assumptions it was not likely that
peace could long be kept in England, where
we must now return to the coming of the Jesuit
missionaries in 1580. The great question which
was agitating the consciences of catholics, was
how far the excommunication of Pius V. bound
them. Left to themselves, a certain sense of most
told them not at all ; but some were scrupulous
about it. Parsons and Campion brought with them
some instructions from the pope (Gregory XIII.)
on the subject. Catholics were to be told "that
1 Father J. Morris, S.J., thus writes about Parsons' abusive language :
"It is to be profoundly regretted that Father Parsons should have
allowed himself to make such terrible accusations against the personal
character of his opponents. . . . Still, considering all that can be alleged
in excuse, the language used by him is, if I may be allowed to judge
so great a man, absolutely indefensible. It seems to have been im-
politic likewise. . . . But on this point of hard, uncharitable language
I for one cannot be the defender of Father Parsons, and indeed I look
upon it with the deepest regret and concern " (Dublin Review, April
1890, p. 253).
2 Tierney's edition of Dodds' History of the Church in England, vol. iii.
THE STATE OF ENGLISH CATHOLICS 245
the bull of Pius Quintus should always oblige the
queen and heretics, and should by no means bind
catholics as matters stood ; but thereafter bind
them when some public execution might be had
on the matter." In other words, according to this
theory, catholics were to be loyal as long as they
could not help it. The knowledge of this instruc-
tion goes far to discount the professions of loyalty
so many of them made then and afterwards.1
When Campion was taken and Parsons fled, there
were in England but two more Jesuits, Frs. Holt
and Haywood, who came over in the summer of
1 58 1. Fr. Haywood was taken prisoner, and Fr.
Holt went to Scotland on a political mission. Soon
two others came ; but a long time the Jesuits were
only a handful. Fr. Gerard says : —
" On my arrival in London (1588), by the help of
certain catholics I discovered Fr. Henry Garnet, who
was then superior. Besides him, the only ones of
our society then in England were Fr. Edmund
Weston, confined in Wisbeach, Fr. Robert South-
well, and we two new comers " 2 (Frs. Oldcorne and
1 Father Gerard in his autobiography speaks of his examination at
the Guildhall, and says : " They asked me then whether I acknow-
ledged the queen as the true governor and queen of England. I
answered : ' I do acknowledge her as such.' ' What,' said Topcliffe,
1 in spite of Pius V.'s excommunication ? ' I answered : ' I acknow-
ledge her as our queen notwithstanding I know there is such
excommunication.' The fact was, I knew that the operation of that
excommunication had been suspended for all England by a declara-
tion of the Pontiff till such time as its execution became possible "
(Quarterly Series, p. 118). 2 Ibid. p. 21.
246 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
Gerard). Three years after the Jesuits only numbered
nine or ten. But they were a united, determined
body with a superior of their own, and thus were
able to work in unison. The secular clergy, on the
other hand, were still left without bishops or superior.
Before the arrival of Fr. Gerard, however, the
troubles had begun. And they came about in this
way. At Wisbeach Castle in the year 1587 were
confined thirty-three prisoners for conscience' sake,
many of whom were old priests of tried virtue and
learning, and among whom was an old monk of
Westminster, D. Sigebert Buckley. The others were
seminarists either from Eome or Douai, many of
whom, be it remembered, were educated, directly or
indirectly, under the influence of the society.1 Fr.
Weston, the Jesuit, was one of the prisoners. He was
not content with letting things be as he found them.
It seemed to him that it would be highly advantageous
if the prisoners were reduced to the regularity of the
life to which he had been accustomed.
1 To understand the situation we will quote from Tierney's remarks :
" Originally introduced as the assistants, the Jesuits, with the advantage
of a resident superior, had gradually become the most influential
members of the English mission. They possessed more extensive
faculties than the clergy. They were attached to the principal families,
were consulted by the catholics in their principal difficulties, and were
the medium through which the funds for the maintenance of the clergy
and the poor were chiefly administered. The younger missioners,
educated in the colleges of the fathers, and still looking to them for
support, naturally placed themselves under their guidance. The elder
clergy, on the other hand, superseded in their authority and deprived
in great measure of their influence, regarded the members of the society
in the light of rivals. . . . Human nature on both sides yielded to
the impulse (vol. iii. p. 43, note).
THE STATE OF ENGLISH CATHOLICS 247
His first step was to get his confessor, a secular
priest, elected as superior of the prisoners. This
plan was negatived. Other proposals of a like
nature were made ; but were invariably rejected.
This went on for seven years ; until at last Weston,
having arranged the plan with his adherents,
suddenly withdrew from the common table. His
absence being remarked, he was questioned as to the
reason, and promptly declared that unless his com-
panions submitted to a regular mode of life, his
conscience would not allow him any more to join
their society. He had a following of nineteen, one
of whom was a Jesuit lay-brother. It is not necessary
here to follow the details of a story on which at
present we can only look back with shame and
humiliation. The scandal went on for months, and
its effects were felt far beyond the prison walls.
Kemote as was the stage on which this unhappy
drama was enacted, and petty as were the actors,
the stir such schisms created in fact, was natural.
For it was inevitably felt that here first came into
evidence the forces which had been long, though
secretly, in conflict ; and, nay, in this quarrel, obscure
and sordid in some aspects, principles were, in the
last resort, involved which were of the widest range
and of the deepest import to both church and state.
The suffering English catholics were now divided
into two factions : those who through thick and thin
favoured the Jesuits, or in other words Parsons'
schemes ; and those who opposed them just as vehe-
248 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
mently. Many attempts were made during nine
months by some of the most reverend of the " old
clergy " to heal the breach at Wisbeach. After many
efforts difficulties were overcome, a new code of rules
was drawn up, and on November 6, 1597, the two
parties met again at the common table.
It was a fallacious peace, however ; for already
steps were being taken by Fr. Parsons in Eome
to complete the subjugation of the secular clergy.
These latter, feeling the want of some head, were
beginning to take steps towards forming themselves
into an association for mutual help.1 This alarmed
the Jesuits. The necessity of some form of govern-
ment was apparent, but Parsons now knew that
the revival of government by bishops would be fatal
to his schemes in regard to the clergy, and would
interfere with his political views. And, upon Allen's
death (1594), Parsons, having got into his place,
was practically the sole director of English ecclesi-
astical affairs.
Attempts after the Armada had been made to
get the succession of bishops kept up ; but hitherto
without avail. Several petitions went up for at
least an episcopal superior to rule and confirm the
stricken flock. Parsons at one time (1580), when
1 See Colleton's Just Defence, pp. 123-5. In the preface to the rules,
they declared, " for our parts, we wish and intend no other thing hereby,
but God's honour, the furtherance of His church's cause, with perfect
unity and concord amongst ourselves by the mutual offices of love,
comfort, and succour, one towards another " (Quoted by Tierney, vol.
iii. p. 45, note).
THE STATE OF ENGLISH CATHOLICS 249
he first came to England, and before politics wholly
carried him away, was an advocate for sending over
a bishop. In 1591 he still held to the idea, and
had fashioned a kind of hierarchy of his own.1 He
had secured the promises of a competent support for
two or three bishops. But when the news of the
proposed association reached him, at once he saw
the danger, and determined on a bold stroke. To
give the clergy a superior, yes ; and one not merely
friendly to the society, but in dependence on it.
The scheme took some little time to mature, and
at last burst upon the astonished clergy, filling them
with dismay. Cardinal Cajetan, who only saw as
Parsons wished him to see, was then protector of
the English mission. After some kind of approval
(so it turned out afterwards) on the part of the pope,
Clement VIII. , who had been kept by Parsons in
ignorance of the real state of affairs, the cardinal,
in his own name and by his own authority, issued
letters appointing one George Blackwell to be arch-
priest, with full jurisdiction over all the secular
clergy. He assigns him six persons as assistants,
and tells him to select six more. This document,
constituting an office unheard of before in England,
ends by exhorting him to cherish a feeling of
brotherly love towards the Jesuits, " who neither
have nor pretend to have any portion of jurisdic-
1 His idea was an archbishop to live in the Spanish domains and
one bishop to live in England. The latter was to have certain assist-
ants, half of whom Parsons practically was to nominate.
250 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
tion or authority over the secular clergy." And
effectually to contradict this last official statement,
a secret instruction was sent with the letter ordering
the arch-priest in all matters of importance to follow
the advice of the superior of the Jesuits.1
To make a painful story short. The heads of the
secular clergy demurred to the legality of the docu-
ment ; and, while giving obedience to Blackwell,
appealed to the holy see. They had not been con-
sulted, although the cardinal hinted the appoint-
ment 2 had been made at the prayer of the secular
clergy. Two priests, Mr. Bishop (who afterwards
became a bishop) and Mr. Charnock, were deputed
to go to Eome, and set out. But care had been
taken to traduce their characters and to represent
them as turbulent and seditious men. Soon after
their arrival, at Parsons' advice, they were both seized
(December 28, 1598), by the cardinal's orders, and
put into prison apart at the English college. Their
gaoler was none other than Parsons himself.3 Here
1 The arch-priest and his assistants were bound to write to the
cardinal every six months, but every week to Parsons.
2 The persons consulted were Parsons and Baldwin, Jesuits, with
Haddock, Array, and Standish, who soon after joined the society, and
some other secular priests at Rome, avowed partisans of the society,
whose opinions were supported by letters from their friends not only
in England but also Spain and Flanders.
3 How this arbitrary act was viewed in England Dr. Ely, author of
the Certaine Briefe JVotes, shall tell us, and his words are of weight, for
he may justly lay claim to the title he gives himself, " an unpassionate
secular priest, friend to both parties but more friend to the truth" :
11 Cloak and disguise it so well as you can now, the posterity here-
after will wonder to hear or read that two catholic priests, coming
THE STATE OF ENGLISH CATHOLICS 251
they were kept in prison for four months, and then,
after a so-called trial, under Parsons' management,
they were expelled from Rome without having even
seen the pope, and were forbidden to return to
England.
" It is evident," says Tierney, " that these proceed-
ings were adopted principally, first entirely, as a
matter of precaution. A great political object was
in view. Had Bishop and his companion been
permitted to approach the pontiff or to converse
freely with his officers, a new impression might
have been created as to the wants and wishes of
the English catholics ; and, in that case, the in-
stitutions of the arch-priest, which in the minds of
its projectors was to determine the future destinies
of the throne, might have been overturned. By
first sequestering and afterwards dismissing the
deputes this danger was avoided. The pontiff
heard nothing but what might be prudent to lay
before him, his impressions were left undisturbed ;
and he willingly subscribed the breve by which
Blackwell's authority was confirmed." 1
as appellants to Eome out of an heretical country in which they main-
tained constantly with danger of their lives the honour and preserva-
tion of that see, and one of them had suffered some years' imprisonment
with banishment afterwards for the articles of St. Peter his successor's
supremacy over all other princes and prelates, that these priests (I say)
should before they were heard what they had to say be cast into prison,
yea, and imprisoned in the house and under the custody of their
adversaries, never was there heard of such injustice since good St. Peter
sat in the Chair" (p. 107).
1 Vol. iii. p. 53.
252 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
The arch-priest denounced all opposers to his
authority as rebels and abettors of schism, and
branded the supporters of the two priests with
opprobrious epithets. When two of the clergy,
Mush and Colleton, complained of his injurious
language, they were answered only by suspension.
His Jesuit friends were not behind-hand ; Fr. Lister
wrote a Treatise of Schism in which he declared
the appellants to be "fallen from the church and
spouse of Christ," &c. How bitter the feelings ex-
cited on both sides it would be hard to tell.
When the breve arrived, the appellants promptly
bowed to the decision. But this was not enough
for the arch-priest, who now made his great mistake.
He insisted upon a declaration that they had been
guilty of schism in disputing his right. The result
of this was another appeal to the holy see. But this
time the secular clergy were determined to bear the
winning side. The Government knew everything
about these dissensions. The face of affairs had
changed from that of twenty years before ; and at that
time of day nothing could better suit Elizabeth than
the ruinous tactics pursued by Parsons. Elizabeth
had watched the progress of the quarrel ; " she was
aware of its political origin, and while on one hand,
perhaps, she sought to weaken the body by division,
on the other, she not unnaturally inclined towards
that party whose loyalty was less open to suspicion." *
Some of the appellants were allowed to be prisoners
i ibid.
THE STATE OF ENGLISH CATHOLICS 253
at large, in order to correspond with one another.
Facilities were given them to print the numberless
tracts and pamphlets to which the controversy gave
rise. About the end of June 1601 Bluet, one of the
Wisbeach prisoners, had an interview with the queen
herself. She consented to allow four of them to be
released and go about the country getting money for
their journey to Rome. They were then pro forma
expelled the country, with passports however; and
went off to Rome with nearly ^1000 for their ex-
penses. Just as they were starting a breve came
from Rome, which Blackwell suppressed as unfavour-
able to himself.
The deputies reached Rome February 16, 1601,
and were kindly received by the pope. They were,
however, shy of Parsons' offer of hospitality at the
English college, and of his desire to be on friendly
terms. They wisely kept their distance. The
petition for bishops was indeed foiled by their ad-
versaries, but all the rest was granted. On the
5th of October another breve was issued, condemn-
ing the conduct of the arch-priest, and doing justice
to the appellants. Blackwell was declared to have
exceeded his powers, and the appellants not to have
lost their faculties. The arch-priest was to have
jurisdiction only over the seminarists, and in future
he was forbidden to communicate either with the
superior of the Jesuits or their general in Rome. He
was finally ordered to take three of the appellants to
fill the first vacancies in the number of his assistants.
254 THE ENGLISH BLACK MONKS
Tierney so well sums up the history that we
willingly make his words our own : —
" Thus terminated this unhappy contest, leaving
behind it, however, a rankling feeling of jealousy
and dislike which cannot be too deeply or too last-
ingly deplored. Yet in closing this imperfect sketch,
let me not forget to remind the reader of the real
nature of the dispute ; let me point once more to
its political origin ; and, above all, let me remark
that however reprehensible may have been the
conduct of any of the parties immediately engaged
in it, that conduct of itself will neither detract
from their real merit upon other occasions, nor
diminish our legitimate respect for the bodies to
which they belonged. To the services of Parsons,
to his comprehensive mind and indefatigable energy
in the foundation and management of many of
the foreign seminaries, the world will continue to
bear witness in spite of all his failings. Yet his
existence was not necessary to the greatness of
his order. Its glory needs him not, and without
detracting either from his merits or his powers,
the disciples of Ignatius may still assure them-
selves that their body 'hath many a worthier son
than he.' " *
We have in this chapter led our readers up to
the point when the benedictines come upon the
mission field. It was necessary to touch upon un-
pleasant details, otherwise much of what follows
1 Ibid. p. 55.
THE STATE OF ENGLISH CATHOLICS 255
would be unintelligible. The position in English
affairs at the moment we have now arrived at, the
beginning of the seventeenth century, was this. The
Jesuits had full control over the education of the
clergy in all the seminaries, even in Douai ; for the
new president of that college, Dr. Worthington, had
made a vow of obedience to Fr. Parsons and was
wholly devoted to him. No student from the semi-
naries could enter England without their leave ; for
he got his faculties for the mission from them or from
Dr. Worthington. And in England itself the arch-
priest, though checked, was still working in their
interest.1
In all this there was no other motive but the
honest and fixed conviction that they, and they alone,
were the best persons to undertake the conversion
of England, a work so much to the glory of God.
Granting this premise, the conclusion — therefore
no one else was to be permitted to interfere — was
legitimate.
So matters stood at the moment we once more
take up the thread of the history of English bene-
dictines.
1 Before the appointment of the arch-priest, Garnet, who had very-
extensive faculties, a source of considerable influence, had also the
power of subdelegating them to secular priests. But now all faculties
for secular priests were ordered to be given only by the arch-priest.
In a letter to Parsons Garnet laments this, for says he : " By this also
have I lost the chief est means I had to win the favour of good honest
priests."
APPENDIX
VOL. I.
APPENDIX
THE CONSUETUDINARY OF ST. AUGUSTINE'S,
CANTERBURY
[The following risumt, of the old consuetudinary of the
great exempt house of St. Augustine's, contained in the
Cotton MS. Faustina C. xii., is of peculiar interest as being
mutatis mutandis identical with that of Westminster, the
largest part of which was lost in the fire of 173 1. The
present manuscript is of the early part of the fourteenth
century, and now consists of 202 folios with 35 lines on each
page. Unfortunately both the beginning and the end are
wanting, and it now commences with folio 51. Several
leaves in the body of the volume are also missing. From
certain marginal memoranda it would seem that in its
original state the volume comprised about 300 leaves. The
consuetudinary proper extends only to folio 257 of the
original. The remainder of the MS. not being a part of the
Augustinian consuetudinary, is not treated of in this notice.
The contents of the book are not orderly in its arrangement,
as will be seen from the list of contents, which it must be
understood is that given on the basis of the original in the
volumes of manuscript collection used by me (see preface)
and which does not always render in full the headings of
the sections as given in the rubrics of the orginal manu-
script itself. Hence in the abstract 1 here given it has been
1 The primeur of the text of the manuscript is thus reserved to the
edition of abbat Ware's Westminster consuetudinary to be published by
the Henry Bradshmo Society.
259
260 APPENDIX
thought well to regroup them under certain distinctive
heads. The picture obtained of the life at Canterbury in
St. Augustine's is that of a fervent, well ordered, and ex-
emplary convent. E. L. T.]
CONTENTS
§ De hospite petente concessionem capituli ;
§ Petitio ;
§ Concessio capituli ;
§ De professione novitiorum ;
§ Forma professionis ;
§ Super Jube dompne benedicere et Tu autem Domine notitia ;
§ Informatio novitiorum secundum usum istius ecclesiee.
§ De vacatione abbatiae per mortem abbatis Thomas de Fyndon
et de electione fratris Radidphi de Bourne in abbatem ;
§ Litera obligatoria Guydonis Donati de prsestanda pecunia p?'o-
curatoribus monasterii in Curia Romana existentibus.
§ Mensura diversorum sedijiciorum monasterii.
§ De ponderibus notula.
§ Reformatiuncula abbatis Nicholai de Spina anno ejusdem
2° facta.
§ De electione abbatis.
§ De observantiis abbatis.
§ De capellanis abbatis.
§ De officio camerarii abbatis.
§ De officio senescalli aula.
§ De officiis marscalli aula.
§ De officio servitor is cultelli abbatis.
§ De officio servitoris manutergii abbatis.
§ De officio panetarii abbatis.
§ De officio marscalli equorum.
§ De officio coci abbatis.
§ De officio valecti cameras abbatis.
§ De officio subpincernae. abbatis.
§ De officio subhostiarii aulse. abbatis.
§ De officio coci aulas et valecti ejus.
APPENDIX 261
§ De nuntio abbatis.
§ De palefridario abbatis.
§ De officio servientis elemosinarix mensx abbatis deputati.
§ De honestate aulas.
§ Oblationes per obedientiarios familix abbatis tribuendx.
§ Modus dandi muner a familix abbatis quando vadit per maneria.
§ Ordinatio familix abbatis anno 2 abbatis Nicholai de Spina.
§ De Us qux ad abbatis prxsentiam et officium spectant ; atque
defratre in abbatem electo qualiter se geret electionis tempore.
§ Qualiter se geret usque dum confirmetur.
§ De confirmation electi alibi quam in monasterio proprio.
§ Ad installationem abbatis processus.
§ De benedictione abbatis non admittenda in conventu eo die quo
confirmatur.
§ De priore.
§ Item de abbate.
§ De officio prioris seu prxpositi.
§ De subpriore sine de priore claustri.
§ Quas licentias subprior dare poterit priore domi existente.
§ A quo petenda est licentia si custos ordinis in claustro non
fuerit.
§ Explicatio brevis de fratribus xgritudinis causa extra chorum
existentibus atque de minutis.
§ De tertio et quarto priore sive de exploratoribus claustri.
§ De officio cantoris et succentoris.
§ Quodjuvenes qui noviter servitium reddiderunt nullum defectum
in choro patiantur.
§ De officio precentoris in capitulo.
§ De cappis in choro portandis.
§ Quod nullus in cappa a choro recedat sine licentia precentoris.
§ Tria de quibus omnibus professis licitum est loqui in capitulo.
§ Prxcentori in multis parcendum est.
§ De gestu prxcentoris in festis solemnibus.
§ De succentoris officio.
§ De officiis sacristx sociorumque ejus.
§ De candelis hospitibus liberandis.
§ Distributio cerx per sacristam facta contra purificationem.
262 APPENDIX
§ De luminaribus, claustro, capitulo, dormitorio, et locutorio
accendendis.
§ De officio celerarii et subcelerario et granatoris.
§ Qualis debet esse celerarius.
§ De iis quse, ad hostiliarii spectant officium.
§ De magistro cryptarum.
§ Recapitulatio de officiants.
§ Casus tangentes excommunicationem.
§ Dejinitio proprietarii.
§ Prxcepta capituli et constitutionum.
§ De Refectorario socioque ejus et de observantiis refectorii.
§ De gesta fratrum in dormitorio atque in camera ; de earner ario
et socio ejus ; de more fratrum antiquo balneandi et sangui-
nem sibi minuendi.
§ De gestu fratrum in claustro ; de mandato ; de elemosinario et
subelemosinario.
§ De capitulo fratrum quotidiano.
§ De excommunicatione et satisfactione culpse, levis.
§ Modus acrior aliquantulum de excommunicatione et satisfac-
tione culparum.
§ De generali confessione a fratre qui ad laternam ponitur
agenda.
§ Alius modus excommunicationis pro rebellione.
§ De sententia gravis culpx.
§ De sententia et satisfactione fugitivorum.
§ Qux sunt culpx graviores.
§ Quae, leviores.
§ De sacerdote sive clerico sxculari postulante ut in hoc monasterio
recipiatur.
§ Quod novitius nonprofessus de infirmaria etc nihil est habiturus.
§ Quo or dine est agenda professio monachorum.
§ Quo or dine suscipiuntur laid conversi juxta consuetudinem
istius monasterii.
§ De disciplina fratrum laicorum.
§ De negligentiis fortuitu ad missse consecrationem contingentibus.
§ De concessione beneficii hujus monasterii alterius congregationis
monacho.
APPENDIX 263
§ De concessione fraternitatis personis ssecularibus et quid speci-
aliter fiat audito obitu eorum vel obitu parentum eorum.
§ De fratribus wgritudinis causa extra chorum ; et de minutione.
§ Quod die tertia redire debent minuti vel ulterius morari licen-
tiam postulare.
§ Nulli raucedinis causa extra chorum morandi licentiam con-
cedatur.
§ De fratre qui medicinatur.
§ De fratre qui inungitur.
§ Regula de claustralibus infirmis.
§ De ordinato fratrum ingressu in chorum.
§ De gestu fratrum qui extra chorum fuerint in vigiliis festi
principalis.
§ Quod fratres ad chorum reversi ad omnes horas eo die esse
tenentur.
§ De gestu fratrum eodem die.
§ De minutione fratrum claustralium.
§ Tempora quibus fratres minui non debent.
§ De petenda licentia minuendi.
§ Quod tres collaterales simul minuere non debent.
§ De minutione fratrum in infirmario jacentium.
§ De minutione fratrum in quadragesima.
§ De minutione laicorum conversorum.
§ De minutione novitiorum minime professorum.
§ De gestu fratrum prima die minutionis.
§ De minutione unius fratris necessitate cogente.
§ Quod minuti et qui ssgritudinis causa extra chorum existunt
processionibus solemnibus interesse debent.
§ De gestu fratrum ad mandatum in capitulo si fiat prima die
minutionis.
§ Quod stando dicetur completorium de Dei Genitrice.
§ Quod unusquisque fratrum quotidie primam et completorium de
B. V. dicere debet.
§ De crasseto quod in locutorio intrinseco ardere debet.
§ A quibus dicendx privatee matutinse.
§ De minutione domni abbatis.
§ De minutione juvenum sive novitiorum.
264 APPENDIX
§ Quodfratres minuti chorum intrare debent ad exorcismum salts et
aquae, si secunda dies sum minutionis dies dominica fuerit,
§ Quod fratres minuti extra chorum existentes ad missam matu-
tinalem seu ad magnam missam indui non debent nisi ante
missam agatur processio.
§ Quod fratres minuti aut qui aegritudinis causa extra chorum
existunt missam cantare non debeant.
§ Quod nullus minuetur die quo alicujus fratris defuncti corpus
in ecclesia jacet.
§ Quod nullus locutorium causa loquendi, ingredi debet die quo
alicujus fratris defuncti corpus in ecclesia jacet.
§ Quod fratres minuti et de itinere reversi ad vigiliam et ad
missam de pyrincipali anniversario esse teneantur.
§ Quod cantor aut alii fratres, cum sanguinati fuerint, nidlum
ofjicium in conventu facient.
§ De refectorario et subrefectorario sive aliis duobus qui in
una administratione conjunguntur, quod simul minuere non
debeant.
§ Quod nullus causa raucedinis extra chorum permittatur.
§ De priore.
§ De cantore.
§ De gestu minutorum tertia die sux minutionis.
§ De fratre cui domus infirmorum cura committitur et de Us
quae, illius incumbunt officio.
§ Quod infirmarius quotidie dicet completorium infirmorum.
§ Quod saeculares persons inter infirmos prandere nee bibere
debent.
§ Quod praedicti famuli (sc. infirmariae) aut unus eorum apud Can-
tuariampro apotecharia quotiens opus fuerit incedere debent.
§ Quod omnes infirmi si fieri potest ad unam mensam prandere
debeant.
§ Quod magnum altare infirmaries nullo die per annum sine
missa et matutinis esse debet.
§ De modo et ordine visitandi fratrem infirmum quando debet
inungi.
§ Quod si infirmus loqui non valet ille qui ofjicium facit in
persona illius dicet confessionem.
APPENDIX 265
§ Quo or dine sacerdos quseret Eukaristiam post fratris inunc-
tionem.
§ Quo ordine Jiet obsequium pro fratre inundo in conventu usque
in octavum diem.
§ Quod aliquis sacerdos dejuvenibus vel ad minus diaconus, custo-
dix fratris inuncti -per priorem assignabitur quemcunque
infirmus rogaverit.
% De commendatione animx exeuntis de corpore atque de csderis
omnibus seriatim quae ad decedentium fratrum spectant
officium.
§ Quod corpus defuncti nulla hora sine fratribus psallentibus
remanebit.
§ De honestate et cura quas camerarius et subcamerarius circa
corpus defuncti habebunt.
§ Quid sit faciendum si aliquis de fratribus obierit dum modo
conventus fuerit ad missas vel ad horas vel in prandio vel in
cena vel in completorio vel ad matutinas vel ad mandatum
in sabbato vel alioquovis modo impeditus.
§ Qualiter Jiet si aliquis obierit dum fratres ad missam vel ad
horam fuerint regularem.
§ Quod si obierit dum fratres fuerint ad matutinas.
§ Quod si hora prandii aliquis moriatur.
§ Quod si obierit post quam sonatur cymbalum ad prandium
aut ad csenam conventus vel dum fit mandatum in sabbato
out in V. feria.
§ Quod si obierit dum conventus sit in dormitorio in meridiana.
§ Quod si accederit incxpto completorio.
§ Qualiter Jiet si in principali festo decesserit.
§ De vigiliis faciendis in decessu fratrum.
§ De vigiliis in obitu fratrum secundum diversa anni tempora
rite distinguendis.
§ Si aliquis f rater obierit post sonitum mane factum quod missam
habebit matutinalem.
§ Consuetudo antiquitus de fratrum sepultura.
§ Quo ordine portabitur corpus in ecclesiam et ad sepulturam.
§ Qualiter fiet si aliquis obierit in node Paschx vel Pentecostes.
§ De beneficiis fratrum quse Jiunt post obitum alicujus Jratris.
266 APPENDIX
§ Quod sit faciendum postquam corpus fuerit in ecclesiam de-
latum post commendationem.
§ Quod corpus defuncti nullo tempore sine psalmodia erit.
§ Quod nullus a monasterio egredietur donee fratris defuncti
corpus sepeliatur.
§ Breviculum fratris qualiter scribi debeat.
§ Quod pro novitio non professo ad missam non fiet panis et vini
oblatio.
§ De officio sacerdotis circa corpus post missam.
% Qualiter revertetur processio in chorum post fratris sepulturam.
§ De balneo fratrum qui corpus defuncti tetigerunt.
§ De distribuendis fratris defuncti indumentis, aliisque rebus si
quas habuerit.
§ Qualiter fiet obsequium pro eo cui conceditur habitus monachalis
si ante professionem obierit.
§ De modo agendi obsequium in decessu fratris laid conversi.
§ Quo ordini fient exsequise fratris defuncti si feria quinta in
Csena Domini aut in die Parasceves vel in Sabbato Sancto
aut in node vel in die Paschse obierit.
§ Qualiter est agendum pro fratre de ecclesise gremio si extra
monasterium qualicumque modo diem clauserit extremam.
§ Quo ordine fient tricennalia et csetera quae agenda sunt pro
fratribus istius monasterii professis de medio sublatis.
§ Quod nullus infra triginta dies post obitum fratris aliunde
quam pro defundis cantabit nisi fuerit in tabida de aliqua
missa consueta.
§ De absolutione fratris defuncti trigesimo die post ejus obitum.
§ Quid fiet pro fratre defundo in die anniversario obitus ipsius.
§ De consuetudine ecclesix qux ad sacristam pertinet et de
expensis cerx per annum.
§ Quando servientes ecclesise habebunt cerevisiam in refectorio.
§ De stipendiis servientium ecclesise.
§ De diver sitate sonitus in diver sis festivitatibus.
§ De lucerna infestis Sancti Augustini, S. Adriani et S. Mildrethse.
§ De lucerna in generali et in speciali.
§ De lucerna feria quarta ante Csenam Domini.
§ De lucerna in Csena Domini.
APPENDIX 267
§ De lucerna in Parasceve Domini.
§ De lucerna in Sabbato Sancto.
§ De lucerna in die Paschse.
§ De processionibus.
§ De tabula argentea ante magnum altare.
§ De festis quse, habent matutinas de die.
§ De vigiliis principalium festorum.
§ De Dirige et Placebo per totum annum.
§ De C&na.
§ De observantiis novitiorum in tempore professionis.
§ De festis habentibus octavas cum regimine chori.
§ De distributione bonorum fratris defuncti.
§ De modo minuendi et ejus observatione.
§ De infortunio ignis.
I. ON THE ABBAT
The election of so important a prelate as that of the lord
abbat of the exempt abbey of St. Augustine's and, as all
documents have it, " belonging immediately to the Roman
church," was a matter of great weight. The archbishop had
nothing to do with it. But as the abbat was one of the
great barons spiritual, the Crown had a great interest and
made its power felt. In the case mentioned in the con-
suetudinary, that of Ralph Bourne in 1 309 may be taken as
a fairly typical example.
Even before abbat Thomas Fyndon 1 expired, the prior
1 Abbat Thomas Fyndon (1283-1309) had been prior and succeeded upon
the resignation of abbat Nicholas de Spina or Thome, who became a
carthusian near Paris. Fyndon was the great builder of the abbey, and his
vast expenditure for a time impoverished the house. He was appointed
by the pope without the royal licence. The king therefore seized the
abbey, and only granted his favour after a fine of 400 marks had been
paid. "In consequence of archbishop Winchesley's continual encroach-
ments upon the privileges of this monastery, and the monks appealing to
the see of Home, pope Boniface VIII. granted a bull confirming all their
privileges" {Monasticon, vol. i. p. 122). Among other things this abbat in
1293 gave a great banquet on the feast of St. Augustine to 4500 persons
( Chronologia A ugustiniensis ) .
268 APPENDIX
and monks sent messengers with letters to influential men
at court, such as the chancellor, the bishop of Chichester,
and the treasurer ; to ask them, in view of the injury done
by a long vacancy, to obtain the royal licence for an imme-
diate election on the demise of the abbat. As soon as
Thomas Fyndon died, the royal subescheator took possession
of the abbey and its revenues, according to the custom, in
the king's name. The licence to elect was duly and speedily
granted. The day appointed, the community assembled in
the chapter-house, after the mass of the Holy Ghost had
been sung ; and their first business was to read the decrees of
the general council concerning election. Then to safeguard
the proceedings against irregularity, as some of the elec-
tors might be labouring under a hidden defect which would
vitiate their right to an active voice, a public protest was
made that any such illegitimate voting was wholly against
the will and knowledge of the chapter. The manner of
election had then to be discussed ; and all agreed to proceed
by way of compromise. Seven monks as electors were
nominated out of the whole body ; and were solemnly
charged to choose one, either of the convent or from another
house of the congregation, whom they should judge to be
"good and benevolent, and useful to the welfare of this
church and necessary for the observance of religion." They
were warned not to choose any one or to pass over any one
for human and personal motives; but to elect "him who
knows how, who is able and desires to love his brethren in
the fear of God and to observe to the utmost the estate and
godly customs of this church." The commission to elect
was signed by the common seal of the monastery, and the
convent bound themselves to abide by the decision of the
seven electors. The result was soon made known. Kalph
de Bourne, one of the seven, was declared to be duly elected ;
and upon his assenting, he was led by the monks into the
church with the singing of the Te Deum. There, prostrated
APPENDIX 269
before high altar, prayers appropriate to the occasion were
chanted over him by the prior, and he was then led to pay
his homage of devotion before the shrines of the saints which
encircled the apse of the church. Meanwhile, the bells of
the abbey in their joyous peals proclaimed the election to the
town, and some " discrete person " from the pulpit made an-
nouncement to the people of the name of the newly elected
abbat. A careful account of the whole day's proceeding was
then drawn up by a public notary and duly witnessed.
The elect, after dinner, took up his abode in the buildings
set aside for the use of the prior. There he was to remain
humbly and not interfere more than any other of the convent
in the affairs of the monastery. He was to be content with
the attentions the monks paid him of their own free will,
and was not to exact more. In the church chapter and
refectory he took the first place on the right-hand choir;
and had certain monks appointed to him as attendants and
companions. But until the election was confirmed he could
not enter upon his rights and dignities. After two days the
elect with some of his monks began their journey to London
to obtain the royal assent. They took with them all docu-
ments necessary to prove the validity of the election, together
with the following letter from the prior and convent : —
" To the most excellent prince and revered lord, Edward,
by the grace of God, the illustrious king of England
lord of Ireland and duke of Aquitaine, his humble
and devoted prior and convent of the monastery of
St. Augustine's at Canterbury, which belongs im-
mediately to the Eoman church, [give] all possible
homage and honour in Him by whom kings reign
and princes have their rule.
" The aforesaid our monastery being vacant by the death of
Thomas of good memory, late our abbat, and licence having
been called and obtained for us to elect another as abbat
270 APPENDIX
and pastor, we have observed the day of election and, after
invoking the aid of the Holy Ghost, have elected unani-
mously our beloved fellow-monk, Ralph de Bourne, as our
abbat and pastor. Him therefore, the brother Ralph our
elect, we present to your royal majesty by our beloved
fellow-monks William of Byhalt, Richard of Canterbury,
and Solomon of Ripple, humbly and devoutly beseeching
that you would deign to admit him, our aforesaid, as elect,
and for ourselves to give your royal assent and favour to
the election made by us. And further, asking, for the elect,
whatever may be pleasing your royal will. In testimony
whereof our common seal is appended to these presents.
May the Most High keep you all.
"Given in our chapter at Canterbury, the viii of the ides
of March in the year of the Lord 1 309."
The affair at court was speedily settled; and by the
seventeenth of the month the monks had returned to Canter-
bury with letters from the king and queen to the pope, to
whom the elect had now to go in person for confirmation.
They also had letters to recommend them to the king of
France, through whose dominions they had to pass on their
road to Avignon, where the pope (Clement V.) then was.
The king's letter to the pope is as follows : —
" To the most holy father in Christ, the lord CI., by divine
Providence, the high priest of the most holy Roman
and Universal Church, Edward, by the same grace,
king of England, &c, devoutly kissing the sacred
feet.
" It becometh us, amidst the other cares which press upon
us, with watchful care to take heed of the welfare of those
monasteries of our kingdom which are in our patronage ;
that when widowed, they may be comforted by the solace of
a pastor, and to frequently stir up your clemency for the
APPENDIX 271
relief of burthens. Since therefore the religious man, our
right-well beloved in Christ, brother Ealph de Bourne, elect
of the monastery of St. Augustine's at Canterbury in our
patronage (to whose election we have given our royal assent
and favour with the hope of obtaining confirmation of the
same from your holiness), now approaches your presence :
bearing in mind that the aforesaid monastery is greatly in
debt,1 and that the state of the house may, by the industry
and circumspection of the elect, be in the future retained,
we do specially commend to your holiness the elect as one
who is provident, and circumspect in spiritual as well as in
temporal affairs, and endowed with other kinds of virtue,
asking with affectionate prayer that you would deign to
admit the aforesaid elect, in those matters which he has
to do with your holiness, to the favour of a hearing and to
send him back to the aforesaid monastery with his business
happily finished.
" Given at Westminster the xiii day of March in the third
year of our reign/'
The queen wrote in similar style commending the elect
to the pope's favour. Together with their letters was a
licence to Eobert of Kendal, the constable of Dover Castle
and warden of the Cinque Ports, to allow the elect to pass
over to France.
At the kalends of April the elect set out for Avignon ;
but, before he started, money for the journey had to be
obtained. The monastery paid over to one Guy Donatus, a
Florentine merchant and member of the society of " Bards "
of Florence, a sum of fifty pounds sterling and received back
from him bills of exchange. Letters of procuration at the
papal court were then made out, and a document from the
monastery to the pope begging for his confirmation of their
election was drawn up. In this latter, after recounting
1 On account of Fyndon's building.
272 APPENDIX
the royal licence and the result of the election, the prior and
convent say : " We must humbly entreat your holiness to
deign to confirm the above-mentioned election and to bestow
on our elect the gift of the Blessing that having God as his
authority he may rightly and profitably rule both us and
others in those things which pertain to his abbacy/5
The papers which had to be taken to Eome consisted of :
(i) the royal licence to elect; (2) the formal appointment
of the day of election ; (3) all documents concerned with the
preliminaries; (4) the letter to the pope asking for confir-
mation, signed by all the community and sealed with the
common seal ; (5) the decree of election signed and sealed
in a similar way ; (6) the royal letters of assent ; (7) the
notarial accounts of the election ; (8) the protest against
unlawful voting (this was only to be produced if any ob-
jection was made that some of the electors were suspended
or excommunicated); (9) and finally a public testifica-
tion of the date of the setting out from Canterbury to
Avignon.
We learn nothing more from the consuetudinary about
this election. But this formidable array of documents
secured the confirmation after the dues had been paid. The
abbat was blessed by the pope ; and on his return to St.
Augustine's, which he approached barefooted in all humility,
he was received with great solemnity by the community and
with chant and prayer, was duly installed. And while the
Te Deum was being sung the monks, one by one, went up
to pay their homage to their new pastor by kissing his
hand, and then as to their father by kissing him on the
mouth. The ceremony concluded by the solemn abbatical
blessing.1
1 Nor was a great feast forgotten on that festive occasion. The new
abbat showed his hospitality by an enormous banquet which Thorne in
his chronicle {Decern Scriptores, p. 2010) mentions M not that we may follow
his example, but admire it." Among the articles consumed were 1 1 tons
APPENDIX 273
Once installed, on high church festivals the abbat had to
assist at matins * and lauds and terce, in alb and cope and
mitre, gloves and ring ; and with pastoral staff in hand
stand at his seat amid his assistants, who were also clad in
copes. After terce a solemn procession round the church
took place. The community, vested in albs and copes,
with the abbat would tarry before some statue or shrine,
and make what is called a station; and there sing some
special anthem with its proper versicles and prayers before
continuing the procession. Afterwards, the abbat would pre-
pare himself for pontifical mass, and would put on the tunic,
the dalmatic, and sandals and buskins, besides the chasuble ;
and he would take his seat in a special cathedra which was
placed near to the altar. Then he would sing mass according
to the " use " of his own church, and employ a missal claim-
ing to be identical with that brought by St. Augustine from
Konie itself.2 One striking feature was the solemn benedic-
tion given immediately after the Pax Domini, when turning
to the people and using both mitre and staff, he chanted
the formula of blessing contained in the Benedictionale,
and which varied with the feast. At vespers, two of his
assistant priests came in at the Magnificat with the thurifers,
and when the abbat had put in the incense, they accom-
panied him for the thurification of the high altar, and' the
altar behind, and the shrine and altar of St. Augustine.
One gave his thurible to the abbat, and held back the cope
of wine (at a value of £24) ; 30 oxen {£27) ; 34 swans {£7) ; 503 capons
(£6) ; 1000 geese (^16) ; 200 sucking pigs (100 shillings) ; 9600 eggs (£4
10s.) ; 17 rolls of brawn (65 shillings) ; coals (48 shillings) ; wages of cooks
and servants (£6) — total £287, 5s. Six thousand guests sat down to a
banquet of three thousand dishes.
1 At the great feasts the abbat, while the Te Deum was being sung,
came in vested as for mass, and, having incensed the high altar, sang the
gospel of the day.
2 See Eule's most valuable and learned Introduction to the Missal of St.
Augustine's, Canterbury.
VOL. I. S
274 APPENDIX
while the prelate incensed the altars, the second assistant
meanwhile incensing the altars together with the abbat. After
the altar and shrine of St. Augustine had been honoured, the
abbat and his chaplain remained before the shrine, while the
two priests went with their smoking thuribles to incense all
the other altars and shrines. They then all returned in pro-
cession to the choir, when the usual incensing took place,
and the stately function ended with the abbatial blessing.
On feast days, when he himself did not celebrate, he assisted
at the function in cope, mitre, and gloves, with the staff, and
took his place between the cantors ; and at the end of the
service proceeded to his throne, whence he gave the final
benediction. Whenever he was present, even if only in his
ordinary choral dress, the deacon always came to him for the
blessing before the Gospel, and the holy text was carried to
him to be kissed, and the incense to be blessed, and the pax
brought from the altar. To him also fell the duty of blessing
and distributing the ashes at the beginning of Lent, the
candles on the feast of the Purification, and the palms on
Palm-sunday.
If at home, he was bound to be present at all vespers of
twelve-lesson feasts, and on all vigils; but he was not re-
quired to be at lauds, unless he officiated solemnly, save on
the Wednesday before Christmas and on the eve of that
feast. The other days in the year he was not bound to be
at either vespers or lauds except the three days before Easter
and the whole of the following week, and also Whitsuntide.
At the office for the dead he was only present on [special
anniversaries ?] or for the funeral of a monk ; and then only
for matins.
The Household. — As befitted so high a prelate and so im-
portant a spiritual baron, in accordance with the requirements
of the times, he was obliged to keep up a large household
in the building set apart for his use, known as the abbat's
lodging. He had to receive many visitors and keep up a
APPENDIX 275
state which would only bring disorder and discomfort into
the monastery if the monks had to be subjected to these
annoyances. But his intercourse with his monks was close
and intimate, as his duty as pastor and father required.
The Chaplains. — Foremost in his household were the
chaplains, two in number. The consuetudinary says : " The
chaplains of the abbat ought to be courteous and discreet,
and affable to all, and especially to strangers." They are
bound to foster, as far as they can, the mutual love of abbat
and convent. Both should say mass every day, and in
turns take the office of assisting the abbat at his mass and
attending upon him in the church and elsewhere. When-
ever he went abroad they bore him company, and one of
them carried a diurnale, in case the abbat wished to say
office. They were in charge of his household, and ordered
everything and corrected what was amiss. The elder had
the charge of the abbatial cellars, the keys of which were
taken to him every night. The prelatial jewels and money
were in their care, and they had to have ten pounds in ready
cash always in the house. To them belonged the duty of
giving out the alms the abbat dispensed when he went abroad
from the monastery. An account every year of all expendi-
ture had to be given. They were also charged with the
special care of the abbat's guests ; and when he was at home,
had to invite certain of the monks to eat at the abbatial
board. The younger had also the duty of reading at the
abbat's meal, unless for some reasonable cause another had
the office.
The Chamberlain. — The chamberlain acted as a kind of
secretary for documents which came under the seal. He
took charge of the abbat's cup and napkin at meal times
and saw that the guests were likewise provided, and that
the wine was served in due course. " And it is to be borne
in mind that from all who come to do homage to the abbat
he has either half a mark or an outer garment, the which he
276 APPENDIX
should civilly and meekly ask for before they take their
departure."
The Seneschal. — The seneschal, when the abbat was going
to dine in the hall, had overnight (between vespers and
compline), together with the cellarer and cook, to wait on
the abbat and receive his orders for the morrow, and to
inquire of the number of guests to be provided for. He had
to see that the " commons " (liberatio) of the hall were duly
provided. After grace, he set before the abbat the dishes
which the servant brought up.
The Marshal of the Hall. — The marshal of the hall minis-
tered the water for washing the abbat's hands before and
after meals, and performed the same office for the chief
guests. He arranged these latter in their proper places.
" He is not to allow the servants to approach the tables too
hastily. . . he is also not to allow a tumult of loose behaviour
in the hall, especially among the waiters (garciones), and if
he finds any one obstinate or rebellious, he shall presently
cause him to be put without the hall, until humble satisfac-
tion is made. If any one comes in after the first course, he-
is to take care that that course is served to the late comer.
He shall punish those who throw their bones or beer-mugs
on the ground."
The Carver. — The carver, who has always to have a clean
napkin over his shoulder and at least two shining knives, is-
not to begin carving before the reading has begun.
The Waiter. — There was also a waiter who carried a
napkin and handed the dishes to the seneschal. Everything
he carried had to be covered with this napkin.
The Pantler. — The pantler had charge of the bread and
the napery, and all other necessaries for the abbat's table.
The Master of the Horse. — The master of the horse had to-<
see to the feeding of the horses, and have a special care of
my lord abbat's palfrey. He had to buy the oats and com
and to see to the shoeing.
APPENDIX 277
The Cook. — The cook had no small office. After he had re-
ceived his instructions he had to provide all that was neces-
sary ; " and when the abbat was at home ought to go with
the cellarer's buyers into the town to purchase better articles
for the abbat and his guests." He had to prepare with his
own hands whatever was for the abbat's own consumption,
and was not to allow any one to help him. Every day
he had to see that the kitchen utensils were scrupulously
cleaned. He is never to be without some good seasonings
(salsamentis), which he is himself to prepare, and is to take
care that in the seasoning for the abbat he is not to use too
much ginger. Immediately after every meal the cook has to
collect the silver cooking utensils and return them to the
chamberlain. He is always to keep the door of the kitchen
shut.
The Valet. — The valet gave out the linen and plate neces-
sary for the abbat's table to the pantler, and the wine and
silver goblets when the chamberlain gave the order. He was
the personal attendant of the abbat, and waited upon him in
his private rooms.
The Cupboard-man. — The cupboard-man had to keep the
cups dry and replace them after each meal.
The Porter. — The porter kept the door, and only allowed
those to enter the hall who had a right. " He is not to
allow ribald fellows to stand about the door of the house,
nor upon the steps ; he is to answer every one civilly and
kindly, and is to take care that dogs do not remain in
the hall."
The Hall Cook and Servant. — The hall had its own cook
and servant. They should " so well and honestly prepare
and see to the good of those who eat in the hall, that no
complaint about them should reach the abbat's ear, if they
desire to keep their position."
The Abbat's Messenger. — The abbat's messenger should be
a prudent man, smooth-spoken, bold, and ever diligent
278 APPENDIX
(impiger) and trusty ; always prompt and ready. He was not
allowed to receive anything from outside without the abbat's
leave. He had to know the gossip of the place about such
travellers as were passing by or tarrying in the neighbour-
hood, so as to let the abbat or his chaplains know who to
invite. He helped in the kitchen.
The Palfrey-man. — The attendant on the palfrey held the
bridle when the abbat was mounted. He distributed also
the alms given on a journey. He also helped the valet in
the personal service.
The Almoner. — The almoner saw to the distribution among
the poor of the daily leavings of the abbat's table. He too
helped in the personal service, and in his instructions he
is particularly warned to take heed, " under pain of dis-
missal, that he does not in any way reveal the secrets of
the closet."
The Hall. — The cellarer was charged with the cleanliness
of the hall and the respect due to the guests. A fire was
provided during the meals from All Saints till the Purifica-
tion ; and during supper eleven candles were provided ; but
on fasting days only three, unless strangers were present.
In this common hall all guests, monks or others, dined and
supped unless they were specially bidden to the abbat's
private apartments or arrived at hours too late for the
common meal.
The Servants of the Household. — Such were the officers of
the abbat's household. Each of them had, besides their
duties, their own perquisites and salaries, and servants to
attend upon them. In a list of the household of abbat
Nicholas de Spina we read that the chamberlain had a com-
panion, a squire, together with boys and horses at his dis-
posal ; the physician 1 was allowed a squire, two boys, and two
horses ; the seneschal had his squire and three boys, and as
1 It is interesting to note that the physician was not one of the monks,
but evidently a layman cunning in leechery.
APPENDIX 279
many horses. And so with the others in less degree. The
marshal of the hall had " one honest boy " and one horse,
likewise the pantler ; but his boy is described as not only
" honest " but " trusty and discreet." The master of the horse
had his boy, too, " one who knows how to shoe " ; and the
abbat's cook was only allowed "an honest and knowing
boy," but no horse.
From the same list we learn that my lord abbat was
served always with four courses, the household with three,
and the servants with two.
The abbat's intercourse to his community was marked
with the greatest deference on their part. Whenever he
passed through the cloister or by any other place where the
brethren were sitting, they rose and bowed whilst he passed.
If they were standing they uncovered their heads and bowed.
Should he in any place have occasion to rebuke a brother,
at once the monk knelt before him and remained in that
humble posture until bidden to rise. " But the abbat should
wisely take care that he should not do this before seculars ;
neither should he allow this to be done for anything ; for it
is not becoming that he should by word of mouth sharply
chide any brother before seculars."
Whenever he sat no one presumed, uninvited, to sit
besides him ; but according to the old custom, if so bidden,
the brother should kneel and kiss the abbat's knees, if he
allows, and then humbly take his seat. Whenever any-
thing was handed to the abbat, or received from him, the
prelate's hand was kissed, and if he were sitting the monk
knelt before him. On the occasions that he dined in the
refectory with the monks, the prior and two of the brethren
served at the washing of his hands.
The ordering of the whole monastery depends upon his
will ; but nevertheless nothing is, as the Eule says, to be
taught, commanded, or ordered (quod absit) beyond the
precepts of the Lord. But also neither should anything be
28o APPENDIX
attempted against the approved customs of the monastery
without consulting the seniors. If while he is absent some-
thing new has, by necessity or reason, to be arranged, on
his return it is for him to decide, with the advice of the
seniors, what has to be done. If he has been absent for
some time (fifteen days), on his return he has to visit the
sick, and with pity and paternal affection console them.
If according to the old custom he sleeps in the dormitory,
and remains in bed in the morning, no sound is to be
made ; but the master of novices, if he sees the hour is
passed at which the prior is used to call them, is to rise
as quickly as he can and call up the novices by touching
them gently with a rod. When they are awakened, they
go out of the dormitory, wash and comb their hair, and
having said the usual prayer, go to their school, where in
silence they wait until the abbat gets up, and then they go
to prime.
When the abbat dies, all he has goes back to the monas-
tery and he is buried like one of the other monks ; except
that, vested as a priest and clad in pontificals, with his
staff on the right arm, he is laid out for the tomb. The
schedule of absolution, a plate of lead bearing his inscrip-
tion and date, a chalice and a paten, together with bread
and wine, are buried with him, and the nearest abbat or
bishop is invited to celebrate the funeral offices.
II. THE OFFICERS OF THE CONVENT
The Prior. — The prior was the chief of all the officers in
the monastery, and was treated with a deference only less
than that shown to the abbat himself. Like him he had a
lodging apart, although he slept in the common dormitory.
He was selected by the abbat out of three names elected by
the convent. The precentor had the right of nominating
APPENDIX 281
one, the right side of the choir another, and the third by
the left side. He is to be obeyed by all, and has to set
an example of exactness in observing all rules. He is
bidden to make himself be more loved than feared. When-
ever he enters the chapter-house or the choir, all rise to
salute him ; but the monks don't rise when he passes by,
only if he goes to sit in the cloister, those near his seat
rise. It is his office, when the Eule is read in chapter, to
comment on it in French for the sake of the more simple
brethren ; or to assign the duty to some one else. In the
absence of the abbat he rules the monastery, and with
the advice of the seniors can make what regulations are
necessary. He holds chapter, and can inflict penances for
breaches of the rule. "But according to modern usage,
each obedientiary punishes his own servants, and removes
those he considers ought to be removed and appoints others
in their place, those only excepted who have received their
appointments directly from the abbat and convent. The
obedientiaries, if there chance to be anything negligent or
slothful in their servants, shall sharply chide them if the
prior so determines." The prior can withdraw from such
of the household who are rebellious and incorrigible, their
allowances until they make satisfaction, saving always the
abbat's rights when he is at home. It pertains to the prior
to give leave to the monks to be bled ; and he also appoints
the hours and days for baths. He can give dispensations
from choir, even in the abbat's presence ; and can also
give leave to the weak, and those requiring it, to eat meat
out of the refectory. He is always on duty; but when he
is obliged to be absent, the sub-prior is appointed to take
his place. In olden days, after the first prayer before
matins, he used to take a lantern and go through the
dormitory and other places to see lest any one, overcome
by sloth, had remained behind. But in modern time this
duty has been assigned to the scrutatores ordinis. At
282 APPENDIX
compline, having taken holy water from the hebdomadary,
he used to remain until the monks had passed by, to see
whether all had been present and whether they had observed
due reverence and order, and whether, according to the
custom, they had put up their hood on leaving the choir.
But this office also is now done by the scrutatores. The
prior sees that all go to the dormitory. Before the daily
chapter he takes counsel with the other priors about the
defects which call for correction ; and the priors have to be
unanimous in all things concerning reformation.
The Sub-prior or Claustral Prior. — The sub-prior or claus-
tral prior was the officer who had the most direct relation
with the monks. He was always with them and was re-
sponsible for the order and discipline of the house. In the
absence of the prior he took his place, and had the same
powers of dispensation. From time to time he had to go the
rounds of the house, and had to know what every one was
doing. It was an important part of his duty to visit the sick
every day. Among his general powers of dispensation was
that of leaving the cloister, but not of going into the town.
He is not to give any one leave to stay outside the monastery
for two days, unless the prior from ill health is away from
the dormitory. All who with leave are going outside the
monastery, and will not be back for the next meal, have
to tell him. The claustral prior on certain days presided
at the chapter, and on these days he could grant many
other dispensations. When the prior was away or could
not be found, the claustral prior could then give leave for
the monks to go into the town or elsewhere, but not to take
refreshments unless it was his day for holding chapter, or
there was any reasonable cause. He also had to see that all
were present at the office.
The third and fourth Priors. — The prior and the sub-prior
appointed two guardians or Exjploratores ordinis, who were
a kind of domestic police. " As the choir, or the cloister, or
APPENDIX 283
the refectory, according to the right and ancient custom,
should never be without two watchers of the order if it can
be done ; if one has to go out, the other remains." They
are warned not to indulge in private malice in reporting a
monk, nor from private friendship shut their eyes to any
negligences. They cannot rebuke, but can only publicly "pro-
claim " or report the negligence at the next day's chapter.
" If they find any one outside the cloister talking, the speaker
has to rise and tell them that he is speaking with the
leave of the prior or sub-prior. The guardians neither by
sign nor word answer them, but modestly pass on, listening,
however, with intent ears whether the conversation be useful.
They go their rounds, one by one, not together. They are
not allowed to go into the offices of the house, but can open the
doors and look whether the brethren are properly engaged.
They had certain fixed times for going round, but were free
to do so whenever they thought fit. If a monk met them on
their rounds, he had to stand still and uncover his head and
wait till the guardian had seen him and passed by. But they
are never allowed to go where the prior and sub-prior are,
nor ever into the abbat's or prior's lodgings ; nor into the
infirmary nor the guest-house, unless there be some grave
reason. " The guardians should be unanimous in all things
and agree together, presuming upon nothing out of the spirit
of contention, or a vain glory in their position." If the
priors were all absent from the cloister, the monks had to
get permission from the senior priest, but he could, as a
rule, only give leave to go into the gardens; but even
he, if there was any necessity, could give leave to go into
the town, so wide and sensible was the rule in practice.
The Cantor. — The cantor or precentor not only had to
take care that the offices in choir went smoothly and had
to arrange for the distribution of the various parts, to set
the pitch and correct mistakes, but he was also the librarian
(Armarius) and had charge of the books, and had to keep
284 APPENDIX
a stock of parchment and other requisites for the use of the
monks. In chapter he had publicly to accuse such as had
been guilty of faults in psalmody. In his charge was one
of the three keys of the chest which contained the common
seal of the house. He was not to be treated too strictly in
respect to absences from choir on account of his various
duties, but he must not without manifest reason omit two
successive hours, nor on the same day be absent from matins
or vespers or compline. He has to arrange the tabula or
list of masses and choral duties. During the Benedictus and
Magnificat he goes from side to side of the choir, to en-
courage and give an example to the brethren of devout
singing ; but he has to be back in his place for the Gloria
Patri. At processions he walks between the two choirs to
keep them united in the chant. On great feasts he rules
the choir with six companions in copes, and preintones the
Gloria to the celebrant ; and his is the duty of singing the
choice portions of the Gradual and of the Tract. If necessary,
during the singing he makes signs with his hands to modu-
late the chant according to his judgment. The importance
of the precentor's office may be judged from the fact that
he had the power to nominate one out of three for the post
of prior, and had the same privilege in the appointments of
sacrist and almoner.
The Succentor. — The succentor was in all things the aid
of the precentor. But to him especially fell the duty of
preparing the juniors for the parts they had to take in the
office. He also had to arrange the collects and their order
for the officiant. On him also was the duty of drawing up
the mortuary notices (Brevicida) and despatching them to the
various houses.
The Sacrist and his companions. — The sacrist was one of
the obedientiaries that represented the choice of the convent.
He had the care of the church, the plate, the vestments, and
was responsible for the candles and the lighting not only of
APPENDIX 285
the church 1 but of the whole establishment. He also had to
provide mats for the choir and those on the north side of
the cloister " from the abbat's parlour as far as the dormitory
door ; " smaller ones for the novices, those for the chapter-
house, and those before every altar. All these had to be re-
newed every year. On him depended the arrangements to be
made for the burial of the confratres. Out of the funds set
apart for his office, he had to keep the roofs of the church
in order, besides those of the chapter-house and of that part
of the cloister jutting on to the church. He was not to talk
in the church " save for explaining some miracle or the
power of some relic or some notice ; and this, if necessary,
not openly but briefly, that it may seem as though done in
silence." The work of the sacrist was shared in by four
other monks, viz. two sub-sacrists (they could not enter the
sacristy without leave), a treasurer or Revestiarius, whose
special care was the relics, and a companion. These and
the sacrist himself slept in the precincts of the church itself,
so as to be always on guard and ready for opening and
closing the church. At the first sound of the bell the five
get up and call the servants of the church ; and it is laid
down that if they are not at office or mass they are to be
more sharply rebuked than those who sleep in the dormi-
tory. After compline they have to prepare the candles for
matins. Each novice and any one else who wished had one,
and there was one for the readers of the lesson and one for
the officiant. This last the sub-sacrist was to light, and to
see that it was a taper so well made as to give plenty of
light for the old monks and for those with weak sight.
During the Te Deum the sacrist had to see that the bell-
ringers did their duty and rang for lauds.2 On Sundays the
1 A note is made that the paschal candle is not removed until the day
after Trinity Sunday.
2 Et tuncpulsandum est ad laudes. The custom of ringing the bells during
the Te Deum is not as a sign of joy during that hymn, but is solely with the
view of giving notice that lauds, the original night office, is about to begin.
286 APPENDIX
sub-sacrist has to get salt from the refectory-master for the
blessing of the holy water, and what is over he returns to be
distributed among all the salt-cellars in the refectory.
For the care of the altars special rules were laid down.
After a feast day all the special ornaments had to be re-
moved before prime of the next day. The high altar was
always vested in a frontal (on great feasts there was a
splendid silver frontal). The high altar should never be,
quod absit, without the pyx, with the Eucharist and the
book containing the four gospels and the name of our
deceased brethren and benefactors written therein; so that
the priest who celebrates there may have a special remem-
brance of them, for instance :• " And of all our brethren and
benefactors whose names are written in this book." In this
spirit of reverence for the holy altar servants were never
allowed to approach it or even to enter the sanctuary except
to do some work the monks could not do themselves. When
the treasurer put out the relics, he had to wear an alb and
to say with his assistant the seven penitential psalms and
the Litany of the saints ; it was his duty, too, to assist the
abbat in the sacristy when he washed his hands and combed
his hair before pontificating. Before every Easter, and as
often as necessary, the corporals were washed. They were
not dried at a fire, nor in the sun, nor in the wind, for fear
of smuts, but inside the house. After washing, the linen
(albs included) had to be " reconciled " by the abbat or
sacrist before use. The same ceremony had to be gone
through if any of the sacred vestments fell on the ground.
To the sacrist and his companions belonged the bells, and
they had to instruct the servants when and how to ring
them. The big bell was rung on the feasts of Christmas,
Easter, Whitsuntide, St. Augustine, SS. Peter and Paul, and
the Assumption. The clocks of the establishment were also
under their care. When the abbat was present at a mass,
the sub-sacrist had to prepare an offering of bread and wine
APPENDIX 287
which the abbat made, and assist him when he washed the
priest's hands at the offertory and after the Communion.
Once a year at least the sub-sacrist made the altar breads.
Grain by grain the corn was chosen and placed in a clean
bag, and then it was sent by a trusty servant to the abbey
mill, which had to be specially cleaned for the occasion.
When the breads themselves were to be made, the sub-
sacrists, after washing their hands and faces, put on albs and
covered their heads with amices and then made the paste.
The servant who held the irons is ordered to wear gloves.
While the work is going on (and the making of a large
supply of altar breads to last perhaps for a year was
necessarily a long business), the monks employed said the
regular hours as well as those of our Lady and also the seven
penitential psalms, together with the Litany. Otherwise it
was all done in silence. A special note is made that the
wood for the fire ought to be very dry and prepared many
days previously.
The Cellarer, Sub-cellarer, and the Corn-master. — To the
cellarer belongs all that concerns food, meat, fish, &c, "and
ought to be, according to the Kule, the father of the whole
congregation," and to have a special care to provide for the
wants of the sick. On the day when the chapter in the Rule
about his office (cap. xxxi.) is read, he had to give "an
honest and festive service " to the monks in the refectory.
He has to attend the daily chapter, high mass, and the
collation, and at the offices for the dead and vespers and
matins of twelve-lesson feasts, and at all processions; for
the rest he was dispensed. He could not go out of the
monastery without permission, and always had to leave word
where he had gone to, in case he was wanted. When he did
not attend choir, he said his matins in the chapel of St.
Gregory, along with those who had been bled or were other-
wise excused. He eat in the common refectory or at the
abbat's lodging. Guests were to be received by him in a
288 APPENDIX
courteous (curialiter) manner, "and in all things he is to
honourably minister to them." The servants of the house-
hold are under his care, and it is to him they take their oath
of fidelity. Every day while the convent is at dinner he
stands by the kitchen window to see that there is no defect
in the service. It is part of his duty to dispense the
extra dishes by way of pitance. For instance, the monk
who sang the high mass always received on that day an
extra pitance. The mill, the gardens and orchards were
under his charge, and the general care of the buildings was
part of his duty. He is told to be affable and pleasant
in his dealings with the monks, and is never to send any
one away annoyed by word of his. He has the power of
punishing the servants, by rebukes, by ordering them to
be flogged with a thin rod, or by fining them ; which fines
went to the poor, or for candles to be burnt before some
shrine. Then, " all and each of the brethren, four times in
the year, can receive from the sub-cellarer, without any con-
dition, an Exennium 1 in honour of their friends who come
to visit them, or can send it to them." The sub-cellarer
had to see that "the convent bread is sufficiently white, and
reasonably fermented and of good taste ; " and also of the
beer; that it is well purified (defecata), of good colour,
bright, and well malted (granata) and of good flavour. The
fish was to be in season and fresh, not kept for two or three
days and stinking, for "that it should not be from the
refuse of the people that the holy congregation be fed."
The bill of fare had to be sometimes changed, lest disgust
be generated, according to the saying, Idemptitas parit fasti-
dium.2 Concerning the pitance, the cellarer shall see that
it is good, delicate, and well and decently (curialiter, a
favourite term) prepared," with everything necessary. The
food has to be ready and well cooked before the monks
i An Exennium was some little gift in the way of eatables or drinkables.
2 Toujour perdrix !
APPENDIX 289
enter the refectory, "for it is better that the cooks should
wait to dish up than that the servants of God should be kept
sitting and waiting without their food."
The Guest -master. — The guest- master represented the
hospitality of the monastery. He is always to keep the
guest-house supplied with beds, chairs, tables, towels, aud
everything else needed for the comfort of the guests.1 When
he hears of an arrival he goes to meet them, and, benignly
receiving them, tells the guests whether it is a fast or feast
day in the monastery. According to the Rule, they are taken
to the church, and thence, after prayers, to the parlour, and
saying Benedicite, he salutes them with a holy kiss. He then
asks their names, residence, and country ; and having ascer-
tained these, leads them to the hospice, where, sitting down
with them, he reads to them, as the Rule says, something from
the divine page, and then speaks a few words salutary to
their souls. If the guests are monks and strangers to this
place, he then shows them the cloister and the dormitory,
and, if time allows, the offices ; and, for the sake of consoling
them (consolandi gratia, another favourite phrase), he can
take them over the whole monastery. The guests have to
be treated especially well, and " all humanity and honour
and welcome " shown to them by all. If the guest chances
to be a conventual prior of some house, he is always to have
the same allowances, both at dinner and supper, as the prior
of St. Augustine's; and a stranger abbat is served in the
refectory as the abbat of the monastery himself. A liberal
allowance of four candles, according to the right and ancient
custom (ex recta et antiqua consuetudine, another phrase of
frequent occurrence) is made for each monk guest, and eight
for a conventual prior. Should any guest wish to speak to
the abbat or prior, or to one of the claustral brethren, he
has to apply to the guest-master, who procures leave. If a.
1 For monk-guests froccos eisdem per famulum suum continuo destinabit.
VOL. I. T
29o APPENDIX
stranger (a monk) behaves in an unseemly manner, so that
his offence is great and known to all, the guest-master has to
proclaim him at chapter, and there publicly he makes satis-
faction. But if the fault is light he is not to be cited, but
secretly rebuked and warned to behave himself better, " so
that he may understand that in this house monastic observ-
ance flourishes." No monk-guest can go out of the enclosure
without the guest-master's knowledge : neither ought he to
leave when a brother is lying dead, until the funeral is over.
If, quod absit, he should have any complaint about the food
or drink supplied to himself or to his servants or horses, or
any want of the usual necessaries, the guest-master has to
mention it at the next chapter, and the president thereof
proclaims "the brother who has thus brought discredit upon
God and the Church." If any strangers (monks) come after
the grace has been said, they are to take their meals in
the refectory, and with the guest-master do penance for
coming in late ; and are then to be seated here and there
among the seniors. If there are guests at the high table
{ad shillam) they stay behind after dinner, and the guest-
master remains also. But if they are invited to dine with
the abbat or prior, the guest-master takes them there, and
returns after the meal to conduct them back again. If they
are not kept behind by the president, the guests have to go
out with the rest of the monks to the church, but remain
outside the choir, where with the guest-master they finish the
grace. " But if they be monks of St. Edmund's, or from a
monastery especially connected with ours," they enter the
choir with the rest of the convent. If they remain behind
with the president and guest-master, and such other monks
as the superior chooses, behind the door of the refectory they
are, as far as can be in silence, "exhilarated and consoled"
by drinking; they are then, "according to the right and
antient custom," taken to the guest-quarters, where doubt-
lessly they were duly " consoled." The guest-master has to
APPENDIX 291
warn his guests of the hours and places. He supplies all
their wants, even to clothing if need be, and distributes to
them what is wanted from the store of clothes belonging to
the deceased monks of the house. Only a monk of the order
is thus to be made as one of the family; all other guests,
religious and secular, are entertained in the outer guest-
house. According to the old custom, as long as a benedic-
tine guest behaves " with probity and honesty," he can stay
as long as he likes ; but if he be found to be a wanderer
(gyrovagus) and acting in an unseemly manner, he is to be
corrected in chapter with both words and stripes, according
to his fault, and then allowed to depart. A monk who comes
on foot is only to be received in the outer guest-house, for he
may be a truant (trutannus). He (and also poor chaplains
and clerics) is to receive from the almoner only entertainment
for the day, and is sent to sleep somewhere in the town.
But any monk who comes as a guest of one of the convent
is to be treated as one of the community. The parents
and relatives of the monks are received in the outer guest-
house, and are there to be most honourably and abundantly
entertained.
The Master of the Crypts. — The master of the crypts had
to provide there for the daily mass after prime, at which all
the juniors assisted. It was a mass of our Lady, and used to
oe sung.
The Almoner. — The almoner had to visit the almonry two
or three times a day, and see to the distribution of food to
the poor which was made daily on behalf of the monastery.
He also visited the sick poor of the neighbourhood and took
them certain " consolations," and saw that they were properly
provided with what was necessary. Anything they asked for
was to be got if possible. The almoner did not personally
visit sick women, but sent his servants in his place.
The Refectory-master. — The refectory-master has to see
that the tables are properly prepared. On days when the
292 APPENDIX
convent take supper he has to lay five loaves before the
president, viz. three " choyns " and two loaves of ordinary
bread, one for dinner and one to be kept for supper. He
has also to provide a loaf for the mixtum. On certain days
the convent had a better bread; simnel bread (siminella),
on some, and a species of gateau (gastellum) on others. He
has to taste the drink provided for the refectory. He has
to see to the lavatory outside the refectory being kept in a
proper state. He provides mats for the benches and straw
for the floor. At the beginning of each meal he "rever-
ently " places a spoon before each monk, but five or six before
the president on account of guests ; and towards the end of
the meal gathers them up again. Also when they have
wine he himself lays out the silver wine-cups ; and after the
pitance, he carries honourably up through the refectory the
cheese, and places it before the president and breaks it
curialiter, and then passes it to the guests and to the monks.
He must not speak " except for the sake of consoling, and
then not openly but briefly." He has to see that the table-
linen is changed whenever there is a general shaving of
the convent, or of tener if necessary ; also that six towels are
placed in the cloister every Sunday morning before the pro-
cession. Of the five at the lavatory near the refectory one is
kept for the sole use of the claustral prior, the other four being
for general use. The sixth hangs at the smaller lavatory near
the church door. At the high mass each day, as soon as the
first Agnus Dei was sung, the three servers for the week,
together with the reader, left the choir to take in the refec-
tory the mixtum allowed by the Rule (cap. xxxviii.). It was,
according to the day, bread and beer ; or vegetables, or eggs,
or fish, or cheese. The refectory-master had to serve them
without delay, and with all care and honour. They ate
sparsely, for they had to return to the choir for the next
hour of the office.
APPENDIX 293
III. THE CONVENTUS
i. The Eules of the Novitiate
When a young man desired to enter the monastery of
St. Augustine's, he had to remain for some time in the
guest-house as a postulant. When the day was fixed for
his admission, or as it was called " the shaving " of his head
{rastura), the prior gave him notice that three days before
he was to dine with the abbat. The abbat would then call
the prior and two or three of the seniors, and they appointed
the novice-master who was charged to instruct him in all
necessary for his state, and to supply all his wants. The
abbat then, after some kind words, left the youth in the
hands of the master, who examined him and found out if
he had everything he wanted for the time of his probation.
The postulant was then warned to cleanse his soul by con-
fession if necessary, and was instructed in the rudiments
of monastic ceremonial. These instructions were spread
over the intervening days, on one of which the postulant
dined with the prior. On the day of the rastura, after
prime, he attended the mass of our Lady and made an
offering after the Gospel. His master then took him to
the chapel of St. Bridget and there prepared him diligently
for the ceremony. When the hour arrived he went with his
master into the chapter-house where the convent was assem-
bled, and having profoundly prostrated himself before the
abbat, was asked by him what he desired, and replied in the
customary form. He was then bidden to rise, and was told by
the abbat how hard and trying was the life he desired. He
was asked if he was free-born, in good health, and free from
any incurable disease ; if he was ready to accept hardships
as well as pleasant things, to obey and bear ignominy for
294 APPENDIX
the love of Christ. To these he answered, " Yes, by the grace
of God." Then pursuing the examination, the abbat asked
if the postulant had ever been professed in any other stricter
order ; whether he was bound by any promise of marriage,
free from debt and irregularity. On receiving an answer in
the negative, the abbat granted his prayer ; and he was forth-
with taken by the novice-master to have his head shaved and
be invested with the monastic habit. Now he was under
tutelage, and remained a " novice " until he was ordained
priest, although only for one year was he technically such.1
The life for novices was regulated in the greatest detail.
For instance the ceremonial used in the refectory was minute
and tended to secure regularity and recollection, together
with courtesy one to another. They had to enter in due
order, bow to each other, and while the others were coming
in had to say silently a De profundis as a solace for the holy
souls. After grace had been said they were to take their
places at the table, but not to stir till the reading had
begun ; then they should uncover their loaves, put their cup
in its place, and get their knives and spoon ready. They
were taught not to drink until the signal was given. From
the consuetudinary we learn that the novices communicated
every Sunday and on the feasts of Christmas, Ascension
day, the three last days of holy week, the three days of
their profession, and the ember-days. They were taught to
have great reverence for the abbat and for all bishops and
prelates. If by chance the abbat came to give them a
conference, they all humbly sat on the ground at his feet.
During their year's probation the novices never eat meat
except under most extraordinary circumstances. There are
minute directions about changing their clothes and the
times, places, and manner thereof ; about the care of the
1 The novice-master had an assistant "in that the most laborious and
tiresome of all ministries."
APPENDIX 295
lavatory and personal cleanliness; about blood-letting and
the bath, &C.1
As the time for profession approached, the novices were
instructed how to read and how to chant, how to serve in
the church, and how to bear the thurible. Offices were dis-
tributed week by week, first to one side of the choir then
to the other;, so all had an opportunity of learning. Before
the day came they had to write out the formula and then
petition in chapter for the grace of profession, and pass
through a public examination as upon entry. The cere-
mony was performed by the abbat during the mass, after
the Gospel had been sung. For three days after their
profession the hood was worn over the face (usque ad
medium nasi), and they kept rigorous silence. At the fol-
lowing chapter, the newly professed took oath to preserve
the secrets of the chapter ; not to complain out of spite or
wicked zeal against the priors and officers of the order ; and,
as far as in them lay, not to allow the monastery to be
burthened with debt.
2. The Eules of the Cloister
The monk's life was largely spent in the cloister. There
all sat in order and in fixed places. No one was allowed
to go outside the cloister without leave. Silence was always
1 It must be remembered that novices were, as a rule, but young men
and had to be trained into habits of regularity and politeness, without
which community life would be unbearable. And such rules as are laid
down in the consuetudinary are, after all, only the expression of regulations
which tacitly exist in every well-ordered family. They were inspired by
the same thoughtfulness for the feelings of others which is the mark of
a true gentleman wherever he is to be found. The rules were not left to
the individual ideas of any one novice-master, but were the established
and written rules of a house that had traditions of seven hundred years
at its back when this consuetudinary was written, and was therefore
able to stamp with an unmistakable character all who were educated
within its walls.
296 APPENDIX
observed save on certain days and times when conversation
was allowed. At other times, they had to obtain leave to
go into the parlour (locutorium) in order to speak. The
abbat, according to his preference, sat at the top of the east
cloister near the chapter-house door ; the prior in the north
cloister near the parlour door, the sub-prior in the eastern
cloister near the smaller lavatory; the third prior on the
western side. The novices and scholars used the southern
cloister as their school. No one sat in the eastern cloister
except the abbat and sub-prior and those appointed to hear
confessions. Those brothers who were in penance also sat on
this side. In the cloister they all sat one behind the other :
but sideways when talking was allowed. On these occasions
"Let no one dare to ask about the gossip of the world nor
tell it, nor speak of trifles or frivolous subjects apt to cause
laughter. No contentions are to be allowed. While talking
is allowed, no brother should read a book or write anything
unless he sits altogether apart." The monks were not
allowed to go to the novices. These were not allowed to
speak or to sit close to one another. They were always
under the eye of a guardian, who while he was on duty was
not allowed to read or write or do anything which would take
his eyes away from watching. The monks seem to have
always worn their hoods during the daytime. French was
the general language of the monastery — Latin only occasion-
ally. In the cloister took place the weekly washing of the
feet, and while the monks were engaged in the process they
wore their hoods drawn over their faces. Shaving took place
here. The prior fixed the day (in the winter once in two
weeks, in the summer twice in three weeks) and four barbers
attended. The seniors were shaved first, "because in the
beginning the razors are sharp and the towels dry," says the
consuetudinary. The cloister was spread with straw in the
winter and with green rushes in the summer.
APPENDIX 297
3. The Kules of the Refectory
In the refectory the monks preserved their respective
places. They had to wash their hands before entry, and
each say the De profundis while taking his place. At the
sound of the skilla, which the president strikes, grace is
begun, always by the precentor or succentor. The monks
stand facing the east. At the end of the grace the reader
approaches the step before the high table and asks the
blessing. Until he has read the first sentence the monks
sit quietly at the table. Should the reader, however, not be
able to find the book at once he recites a short sentence from
Scripture (Deus caritas est), so as not to keep them waiting
unduly. The one who presides sits in the middle of the
high table and has the little bell to give signals. The guests
are placed on either of his sides. Should a bishop or abbat of
some other order be present, out of respect he takes the chief
place, but does not preside at the skilla ; a benedictine abbat,
however, presides as if at home. The various dishes are taken
first to the superior and then in order round the community.
The monk who sang the high mass that day is always served
after the guests, and then the non-professed novices. No
waiter (the monks, all but the novices, served week by week)
is allowed to carry three dishes at once. The refectory being
the common dining-hall, no singularity in eating or drink-
ing is allowed. No noise to be made ; for instance, if there
are nuts, they are not to be cracked with the teeth, but a
monk is privately to open them with his knife, so as not
to disturb the reader. Should he spill anything, he has to
go and do penance in the middle of the refectory if strangers
are not present. He is not to make signs across the
refectory, not to look about or watch what the others are
doing ; he is not to lean on the table ; his tongue and eyes
are to be kept in check, and the greatest modesty observed.
298 APPENDIX
His ears, however, are always to be attentive to the reading
and his heart fixed on his heavenly home. He eats with
his head covered with the hood. " No one, whether in the
refectory or outside, should drink without using both hands
to the cup, unless weakness in one hand prevents him. . . .
And this manner of drinking was common in England
before the coming of the Normans." If the president sends
any special dish to some one brother, the receiver rises
in his place and bows his thanks. When the meal is
finished each monk covers up the bread that has to serve
for supper, and sets his knife and spoon and salt vessel in
order. They then begin grace, and go out in procession to
the church where it was finished. The reader and the servers
have to go out also, but do not go into the choir ; and as
soon as they have privately finished their grace they return
to the refectory for their meal, which is served precisely as
the others. But they " as a reward of their labour ought to
be served in the most honourable and best manner possible,
both of the vegetables and pitance, and of the extra dish."
4. The Eules of the Chapter
One of the most important features in the government of
the abbey was the daily chapter ; it was the mainspring of
discipline and the upholder of fraternal charity. Without
such an institution it would have been impossible to govern
the house. According to the old custom, every day before
the chapter, the prior summoned the guardians of the order,
some of the seniors and other discreet monks, if necessary,
to consult with them about what should be treated of in the
chapter or corrected ; so that nothing should ever be done
there on the spur of the moment or without advice. In
chapter only those things which pertained to salvation were
to be treated of, business matters being spoken about else-
where ; but any pressing business which required the know-
APPENDIX 299
ledge and assent of the whole convent could be briefly gone
into after the main business was completed. All in the house
were bound to attend. The superior entered first and was
followed in due order by the seniors ; and when all had
taken their places a junior read the martyrology for the day.
The tabula or list of duties and notices was then read, and
each monk on hearing his name bowed. Then followed a
discourse if the superior thought fit, and at the end he said
Loquamur de or dine nostro. At this point the non-pro-
fessed novices rose and went out.1
There were "three voices" recognised in the chapter:
the accuser, the answerer, and the judge ; and another
"five voices," to wit: he who presided; the guardians of
the order ; the precentor and succentor ; the brothers charged
with keeping the silence, " because silence is called the key
of the whole order " ; and then the almoner and sub-almoner.
These five in their order were the first to "proclaim" any
one whom through their respective offices they knew had
infringed the rule. The monk so proclaimed had to go out
into the centre of the chapter and, prostrating, made con-
fession of his fault, and, saying mea culpa and promising
amendment, then received penance and rebuke. Should he
be accused falsely he could " sweetly " say that he has no
recollection of the fault. Special severity was to be shown to
the juniors, for then " order will much better flourish in the
congregation." Every one who had ceased to be under ward
had a right to speak in the chapter on three points ; defects
1 " The word capitulum can conveniently be said to mean caput litium,
for in chapter all strife is put an end to and any discord or dissension
there may have been among the brethren. The chapter-house is the
workshop of the Holy Ghost, in which the sons of God are gathered to-
gether and reconciled to Him. And it is especially the house of confes-
sion, the house of obedience, mercy, and forgiveness ; and the house of
unity, peace, and tranquillity, in which whatever exterior offence com-
mitted to the knowledge of the brethren is confessed, and by satis-
faction is mercifully forgiven."
3oo APPENDIX
in the public worship, the breaking of silence, and the
distribution of the alms. On other subjects he must
ask leave to speak. But the abbat's councillors, four-
teen or sixteen seniors (senpectes vel senes), chosen from
both choirs, have freedom of speech when any matters
which concern observance and the increase of religion
are discussed. Any one who speaks is to be heard by
all, and is not to be rebuked for what he says unless he
speaks disrespectfully. Any one disagreeing with what
has been said, can with all modesty and reverence dis-
pute the matter, "lest discordant contention finds place
for overthrowing of the order." But disturbers of the
chapter, the disobedient and those disrepectfully contend-
ing with their superiors, are to be sharply corrected by
words, stripes, and fasts, that their bad example may not
corrupt others. Provision is made against any insulting
language to the president of chapter, and should such occur
the guardians and all seniors are at once to proclaim him.
Every fault confessed has to be punished. If in penance a
monk is ordered to receive stripes, the president appoints one,
never the proclaimer nor a junior, to execute the sentence ;
and the culprit, according to the old usage, prostrated and
received on his bare shoulders the number of stripes or-
dained.1 But according to the later custom he sits with his
face and head enveloped in the hood. "While corporal
discipline of this kind is being inflicted upon a brother all
the rest sit with bowed and covered head, and with kind and
brotherly affection should have compassion on him." In the
meanwhile no one speaks, or even looks at him, except the
president and the inflictor and some of the elders, especi-
ally the confessors of the house, who can intercede for him.
The list of punishments is given, and is divided into those
for light faults, such as : separation from the common table ;
1 According to the old custom a thick rod was used ; but in later days
a birch of " several lither twigs."
APPENDIX 301
to take the meal three hours later than the community ; x
to take a lower place in choir and chapter ; not to celebrate
mass nor to assist ministerially ; not to read in public, nor
sing nor act as thurifer or acolyth ; not to make the offer-
tory, nor receive the pax or the holy communion ; to pros-
trate during part of every office. For grave faults perpetual
silence (in choir as well as elsewhere) ; bread and water every
Wednesday and Thursday ; the last place in the community.
For the very grave crimes imprisonment according to the
Rule. Such an one had also to lie prostrate in the doorway of
the church at each hour, so that the monks passed over his
body on entering or going out, and he had to sit outside
the choir as one excommunicated.
If any one in chapter became altogether rebellious and
would not be otherwise controlled, he was seized by the
brethren, who took away his knife and girdle, lest he should
in his madness do harm, and was then put into the prison.
Every one was liable to be proclaimed, even the abbat ;
but he, as a rule, had to be reverently spoken to by some of
the seniors outside the chapter, should he have been guilty
of any serious fault. But if his fault was notorious and it
was judged useful, he could in a few words be proclaimed in
the chapter. The prior, when proclaimed, stood in his place
and bowed. If it was a serious offence, two of the seniors
at his request go into the middle and do penance in his
stead. The abbat is warned by the consuetudinary to have
a great respect for his prior, and not to rebuke him publicly
for an indiscreet word or so. The obedientiaries are not
to be proclaimed by the names of their offices, but by their
simple name and number — e.g. Nonnus A quintus vet nonnus
A decimus. If by chance there are several of the same name,
all of them have to rise until the proclaimer indicates which
one he refers to. There are to be no mutual proclamations
1 The time, while the others were eating, had to be spent in prayer in
the church.
302
APPENDIX
in the same chapter, nor is any one to proclaim after he has
once sat down. The proclamations over, any monk who had
a petition to make then went into the middle, and prostrat-
ing, in answer to the abbat's demand what he asked, replied,
" I ask and beseech God's mercy and yours for — " according
to his need. This was the occasion when a monk asked for
prayers for his deceased parents and relations, for himself
before ordination, for leave to give up some work imposed
upon him, for mercy for others, for leave to go to the
infirmary, or for the blessing before profession, &c. These
petitions being heard and granted, if judged well, any lay-
men or others who desired confraternity were admitted by
the chapter, and their petition was granted. The business
being completed, prayers for the dead were said by the
president, and upon the signal the blessing was given and all
retired.
5. The Rules of the Dormitory
The dormitory was a place of perpetual silence. The
monks wore their hoods drawn over the face, and walked
with slow and grave footsteps and eyes cast down. After
compline the convent go processionally to the dormitory,
and according to ancient usage paused at the latrine for
the common need. On entering the dormitory, each stood
before his bed and said privately the compline of our Lady.
They then prepared their beds for the night, and took off
their upper garments according to a fixed rule 1 and got into
bed. If any one was in the habit of calling out in his sleep,
he slept elsewhere than in the common dormitory.
The monk rose at midnight for matins. Some, to stir up
their fervour, used the words, Ucce sponsus venit, exite obviam
ei ; others, the words Surgite mortui qui jacetis in sepulchris
vestris et occurrite ad judicium. The prayers used while
1 " Vestiti staminis, femoralibus et caligis atque cincti cingulis aut vestibus vel
carrigiis dormire debent."
APPENDIX 3o3
getting up were the Ave Maria, with special reference to
the midnight hour at which Christ was born. After the
office they went back to the dormitory. When they rose
again before prime, they signed their foreheads with the
cross and said, each one, the Credo and the prime of the
little office of our Lady. According to the regulation, all
had to have their feet out of bed before the sound of the
caller has ceased ; and he is instructed to sound slowly, as
it were for the space of a Miserere. On rising they turn
back their beds and go to the lavatory to wash and comb
their hair ; then to the church for prime ; after which came
the private masses.
In the olden days the monks changed their clothes on the
occasion of the bath, which used to be taken four times
a year. But since a stricter interpretation of the Eule
was introduced, and the general bathing allowed only twice
a year, the monks were allowed to change their clothes
when they wished. They had a specified mode of making
the change, which was always done after prime ; and after
putting on their clean clothes they were ordered to wash their
hands before returning to the cloister.
There was a siesta in the middle of the day, for which
they had to undress as for the night. Each bed-place had
a shelf and a hook provided, but no other convenience
except for the old and infirm. The bed-clothes were not
to be of scarlet or any vivid colours. Great cleanliness
was ordered in the dormitory, and no dirty or old boots
were allowed to be kept in it. The chamberlain was re-
sponsible for the well-keeping of the dormitory, and had
to have it thoroughly cleaned out, at least once a year. Hay,
changed often, was strewn on the floor, and a large mat two
and a half feet wide (which the guardian of the manor of
Northburne had to provide) stretched the whole length of
the dormitory. The beds were of straw, and had to be re-
newed every year. The chamberlain, besides the care of the
3o4 APPENDIX
dormitory, had to see to the monks' clothing, and had to
make on stated days a distribution of various articles of
clothing. Each monk had a new habit at least once a year,
also one pilche,1 one set of night wear, and one pair of
slippers, &c. Boots were to be renewed once a year, and
" no one could refuse to accept a pair of boots, if too large ;
but the chamberlain should do his best to get each one
fitted." The old clothes were given to the poor, and there-
fore it is laid down that the monks' clothing is not to be
mended too much.
6. The Kules of the Infirmary
The prior or guardians have to visit the infirmary every
day after the private masses, after each meal, and after
compline, to see the sick and make inquiries and receive
complaints. If a brother is unwell, he has to get leave to
go to the infirmary, and goes to the cellarer and gets for his
consolation, doubtlessly, from him a good fat capon and some
wine, from the sacrist a supply of candles, &c. ; and thus
supplied, is prepared for any contingency. He has to go
to the infirmary for at least eight days, and during that time
is not allowed, without special leave, to celebrate mass, but
has to assist at the daily mass said in the infirmary. " In
the infirmary no unseemly noise should at any time be made,
nor should any sound of musical instruments be ever openly
heard there. But if it is considered necessary for any one
who is weak and ill, to have his spirit cheered up by the
sound of music and harmony, the infirmarian can provide
such relaxation. The sick brother is taken into the chapel
and the door shut ; then some brother or some honest and
private servant can, without offence, play sweetly the music
of the harp for his delectation. But great care must be
taken lest any sound or melody of this kind should be
1 These were of lamb's wool, cat or wolf's skin.
APPENDIX 305
heard {quod ahsit) in the infirmary hall, or in the cells of the
brethren." The sick are to have every attention and all that
they want ; and it is ordered that one of the servants of the
infirmary has to go into the town to the apothecary when
required to get the medicines, to collect herbs for decoctions,
and, under the doctor's orders, to make the tisanes, &c.
Should these, together with the fat capon and other con-
solations, prove efficacious, the brother, when restored to
health, had to present himself before chapter and ask ab-
solution and penance for all the faults and infringements
of the Eule he had been guilty of while ill. But if the
sickness was unto death, the end was met and prepared for
as became monks.
When it was announced that a brother was dying, the
whole convent gathered together in the church, together with
the abbat, and then went in procession to visit the sick, and
to anoint him. The monks, headed by juniors bearing the
holy water, cross, candles, and thurible, chanting the seven
penitential psalms, set forth towards the infirmary. The
sacrist followed bearing reverently the holy oil, and the
abbat in alb, stole, and maniple humbly followed, accompanied
by his chaplain bearing the ritual. Arrived at the place,
the monks stand choirwise and continue their chanting while
the sick man is aspersed and incensed. The public con-
fession is made by the sick man himself if possible, and he
is absolved by all his brethren, and absolves them in turn.
Then, according to the old usage, after having kissed the
cross he is anointed by the abbat. Meanwhile a priest goes
with acolythes and candles to the church and brings the
Sacrament of Christ's Body, borne on a paten, to the sick
chamber, and on entering all kneel and adore. The mouth of
the sick monk is rinsed out before he receives the sacred host,
and immediately before communion he makes his profession
of faith and receives the ablutions of the priest's fingers after-
wards. For eight days after the anointing, special prayers
VOL. I, V
306 APPENDIX
are said for the sick man by the convent, at the end of each
office and also at the morrow-mass. And now the sick man
prepares himself for death by resuming the old ascetic
practices. No longer does he take meat (unless he recovers),
nor does he use a softer bed than usual. One of the monks,
priest or deacon, whomsoever the sick man names, is assigned
to him as tutor and friend, and special servants, who have
special privileges, are appointed to wait on him. He is never
left until death supervenes or he recovers. The brother is
constantly to read the passion of our Lord to him as long as
he can hear ; and when unable to do so, the psalter is said
to assist him in his agony. When death is at hand, accord-
ing to the old custom, ashes were strewn on the floor in the
shape of a cloth, and haircloth laid thereon ; and on to this
penitential bed the dying man was gently lifted, according
to the example of St. Martin, who told his disciples that
Christians ought only to die on ashes and sackcloth. But
the more humane usage of later times modified this custom,
and the ashes and haircloth were put upon the bed itself.
As soon as the agony began the convent were summoned,
and with thurible and cross, and singing Credo and peni-
tential psalms, they assisted at the departure of their brother.
The deceased, clad in his night garments (it was specified
that the clothes had to be good, even new), with his face
covered with a sudarium, was borne into the church, and
there the office of the dead was sung, and vigil kept around
the body, which was never left until the funeral. He was
borne to the grave by his brethren, and laid therein by two
monks vested in albs. In the chapter immediately after
his death, the convent took the discipline conventualiter for
the relief of his soul. For thirty days office was said for
him, and the month's mind duly kept. Doles were made
to the poor on his behalf ; and each priest in the house said
ten masses, and those not priests ten psalters. Notice of
the death was sent to all religious houses in Great Britain,
APPENDIX 307
except to the mendicants, and a dirge and mass celebrated
in each. In the houses specially connected with St. Augus-
tine's, the name of the dead was inserted by the precentor
in the Martyrology, and besides the public mass each priest
said one, and the others read fifty psalms.
When news came of the death of a con/rater, a dirge and
solemn mass was sung as the official act of the convent, and
each priest said a mass, and the other monks fifty psalms.
The name of the con/rater was entered in the Martyrology,
and his anniversary kept as that of one of the monks. It was
also inserted in the next breviculum which was sent out,
and thus he shared in the prayers of every house.
7. Some General Rules
Among the regulations scattered throughout the consue-
tudinary are some of special interest. In the Reformation-
cula of abbat Nicholas Thorne it is laid down that on days
when the convent assisted at a sermon they could say the
usual penitential psalms privately ; and this and the like
dispensations were given, so that the office itself might be
said more slowly and more devoutly. The eating of meat
was allowed to the brethren who bore the weight of the
office ; but never in the refectory but in the domus miseri-
cordiarum, and always with the provision that never less than
thirty monks were to be present at the ordinary meal in the
refectory. No seculars were to be allowed in the domus
misericordiarum, and the monks had to serve themselves.
Obedientiaries and others whom business took abroad were
not allowed to eat meat, especially in public; for, it is
recognised " this is against the Rule, and altogether against
canonical institution."
" Let the confessors discreetly do all that belongs to their
office, viz. to know how to weigh and discern between sin
3o8 APPENDIX
and sin ; between person and person ; between manner and
manner; and what circumstances aggravate a sin."
"Also let the brethren frequently confess, at least once
a week ; and not only once but twice or thrice, or daily if
their conscience demands it, for it is said the just man falls
seven times a day. And those who confess, let them be ready
to receive and duly perform penance." The confessors have
every month to give in, to the abbat or other superior, the
names of those who confess to them, and whether they
confess according to the above manner. Those who do not
confess within the ordinary times are to be rebuked and
publicly punished in the chapter.
No priest is to refrain from celebrating more than four
days without the superior's consent ; nor the others from
weekly communion. Transgressors were to be put on lenten
fare till they repented.
The monks were not allowed to write or receive letters
without permission.
" That our Rule of our holy father Benet be held by all in
great reverence. That the statutes of the popes, of the legates,
and of the general chapter of our order are to be read in the
chapter-house at fixed times, and are to be observed as
far as they do not go against our privileges or reasonable
customs."
That the monks all dress alike, the same cut, the same
colour and material.
That in processions the monks should go orderly and
gravely, and that there should be a distance of seven feet
between each monk.
That no brother should become a guardian or have ward
of seculars without special leave. No one is to take part in
secular disputes unless for the convent or church.
The brethren were for the future forbidden, under pains
provided for in the canons, to play at chess, dice, &c, or
to use bows or slings, or run with poles, or throw stones,
APPENDIX 309
big or little, or to be present at fights or duels, or baiting,
or cock-fighting, or to run in the woods, with shout and
hounds, in the profane sport of the chase.
That behaviour is to be guarded between the monks and
seculars as well as among themselves : and that no one gives
ear to rumours or such like fatuities which profit not the soul.
That all wicked carnal affections and foolish consortings
be repressed ; and all giving of blows is forbidden.
That the younger monks, after they have finished their
tutelage, should study Holy Scripture, for nothing is more
hateful than not to know how to occupy oneself. Let them
learn off by heart the epistles and gospels for the whole
year. Before they venture to read them publicly, they must
be diligently practised.
There are some who practise private acts of mortification
and leave unobserved those prescribed by the Rule. Such as
these are to be rebuked.
Since some of the monks get bled too often and without
necessity, in order to get the solatium allowed at those times,
it is ordered that bleeding is only allowed once in seven
weeks.
Those who have leave to go outside the enclosure do not
therefore get leave to eat and drink outside, or to go to the
houses of seculars. On journeys, monks are to go to houses
of our own order in preference to any other.
No one is to be promoted to the priesthood save by a
special favour and by the advice of the seniors. If any
youth of ability is sent to the university, he has to know
by heart, before he is allowed to go, the psalter, the
hymns, canticles, communion of saints, the ferial antiphons,
and short responsories, and all the versicles of the whole
antiphonary.
There are some who claim a general dispensation from
compline. No such licence is ever to be given. Permission
is only granted in individual cases from certain and reasonable
3io APPENDIX
causes. Those who are dispensed are to say their compline
sitting near the chapter-house door, and not walking about
the cloister. They, also, are to be in the dormitory before the
curfew sounds.
"And let the brethren take heed that they fail not in
these, for very perilous it is to fail in such laws until
they have been revoked by the abbat, or with his permission
by the prior or sub-prior in full chapter. There are some
who attach little weight to the precepts of chapter, and say :
' We will do what is ordered for two or three days, so that
we may seem to accept and obey them ; but beyond this we
don't care.' Such as these wickedly sin."
END OF VOL. I.
Printed by Ballantyne, Hanson & Co.
Edinburgh 6* London
*X SG16 ~.T38 1897
v.l SMC
Taunton, Ethel red
(Ethelred Luke),
. The English black
of St. Bendict :
t AKH-4077 (awab)
monks
a
4