(logo)
(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Open Source Books | Project Gutenberg | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Children's Library | Additional Collections

Search: Advanced Search

Anonymous User (login or join us)Upload
See other formats

Full text of "The Inquisition in Spain, and other countries"

? 



f- 

1715 
15 



THE 



INQUISITION 



IN SPAIN, 



AND OTHER COUNTRIES. 



LONDON: 

THE RELmiOUS THACT SOCIETY 

Instituted 179!?. 



sx 

! 7/5 
15 




CONTENTS. 



CHAPTER I. 

Page 

OUICI.V AND FIRST LSTAELISHMENT OF THL INQUI 
SITION 5 

C!IA1 : !ER II. 

APPARATUS AND PROCESSES OF THE INQUISITION . 3-1 

CHAPTER Til. 

THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN 70 

CHAPTER IV. 

THE INQUISITION IN . PAIN (continued) . . , 313 

CHAPTER V. 

THE INQUISITION IN PORTUGAL AND GOA . . . 133 

CHAPTER VI. 

THE MODERN INQUISITION IN ITALY , . 1T7 



THE INQUISITION. 



CHAPTER I. 

ORIGIN AND FIRST ESTABLISHMENT OF THE INQUISITION. 

No argument against the apostolicity of the 
Romish church is presumptively more strong 
than that which arises from the sanguinary 
character of its whole history. Its repeated 
persecutions its bloody crusades its exter 
minating desolations have not only outraged 
the sympathies of human nature, but have 
stood in such violent contrast to the genius of 
the gospel as to engender the suspicion that a 
resort to such desperate arms for defence must 
have been prompted by some secret conscious 
ness that the system was weak in more essential 
elements. The following pages will illustrate a 
scheme of ecclesiastical action in which the 
light and love of Christianity are sought in 
vain ; whilst in substitution for them stands a 
despotism .fashioned after the world s worst 
rule ; which racks the body and rends the 
heart ; which combines the suspicious, the 
-jealous, the absolute, the severe ; and which 



6 THE INQUISITION. 

has more affinity with the worship of Moloch, 
or the ancient sacrifices of savage Druidism, 
than with the truth which proclaims mercy to 
all, and comes " not to destroy men s lives, 
but to save them." 

Towards the close of the eleventh century 
the Romish church had reached the culminating 
point of its greatness. Under Hildebrand 
(Gregory vn.) the bishopric of Home had 
claimed over the princes of Christendom a 
dominion in matters temporal as well as spi 
ritual. Such a power was not likely to be 
conceded Avithout a struggle , but the mere 
demand carried in its train a mass of evils. 
The pretensions of the clergy, and the vices for 
which they were notorious ; their continual 
interference in secular matters ; their enormous 
exactions ; their incredible superstitions ; their 
generally obvious ignorance, and their entire 
indifference to public opinion, contributed to 
form throughout the continent of Europe a 
mass of spiritual disaffection which only needed 
to be brought into contact with some exciting 
outward influence to explode destructively. In 
such a case, echo answers to echo through an 
almost interminable series. The popular im 
pressions produced against the church of Rome 
reacted upon that church itself, and created in 
its mind the desire to silence di>alli< ti-.n by 
persecution. That persecution again unit-d in 
mim-n sympathy the hearts of the real 
disciples of t: Lord, taught them how 

to take the first steps for delivering themselves 



ORIGIN AND FIRST ESTABLISHMENT. 7 

from their galling fetters, and prepared the 
way for that wide assertion of spiritual liberty 
which constitutes one of the greatest blessings 
of modern times. 

How early the Christian church had degene 
rated from its primitive simplicity, and had 
begun to adopt grievous and destructive errors, 
needs hardly to be told. The worship of the 
Virgin ; the superstitious regard shown for the 
consecrated wafer, which afterwards settled into 
the doctrine of transubstantiation ; the practice 
of private confession ; the antiphonal chanting 
of psalms by night as well as by day ; the 
legends of marvel and miracle ; the decorated 
robes ; the lighted tapers, the long proces 
sions, the smoking incense ; the self-inflicted 
macerations and vigils ; the holy water ; the 
infallibility of the pope ; the recluse habits of 
monasteries and nunneries ; the declared effi 
cacy of relics ; the service of the mass ; the 
celibacy of the clergy ; these, with many similar 
evils, had gradually increased and accumulated 
in the bosom of the nominal church, till religion 
became a mist only short of total darkness, 
extinguishing the lights of truth, obscuring the 
headlands which should have marked the path 
of progress, magnifying objects intrinsically small 
into gigantic proportions, and throwing all eccle 
siastical subjects into a state of chaos, in which 
disorder and confusion were alone triumphant. 

The first chapter of the history of truth 
always begins with the small voice in the 
desert ; and deeply as the so-called church of 



8 TIIE INQUISITION. 

Christ had fallen from its original piety and 
purity, and degraded as it had become by cor 
rupt and pernicious influences, there was not 
yet wanting a small minority who, "faithful 
among the faithless," and contending with every 
conceivable disadvantage and oppression, yet 
represented the simplicity and devotedness of 
the primitive disciples. Such were the Wnl- 
denses a people singularly interesting ; the 
pioneers of a later reformation ; the spiritual 
isthmus which binds Protestantism to primitive 
Christianity; nnd the first who in modern 
times ventured to cut the tangled unli rv. 
of a false Christianity. Peter Waldus, a native 
of Lyons, who lived towards the close of the 
twelfth century, tormented and roused by the 
corruptions he witnessed around him, caused 
portions of the Scriptures to be translated into 
the current language ; and though originally a 
layman, formed around him a church to which 
he preached and expounded. "\Val<n, 
band became afterwards associated with another 
body of humble disciples, the descendant 
the ancient Paulicians, who inhabited tin- val 
leys of Piedmont, and were <! lois, 
(in French, ) Waldenses, (in Latin,) and Val 
ley men, (in English,) names which aftenv. 
became affixed to the united community. 

These Christians cultivated the utmost sim 
plicity of dress and manners. Unambitious of 
li, they abjured all unfair and d 

/iiiinpr gain; they observe*] the 
Strictest t- ;m . r;,:iee and chastity, and den!- 1 



OHIGIN AND FIRST ESTABLISHMENT. 9 

themselves, with true moral sublimity, even 
those innocent enjoyments which might appear 
to identify them with their ungodly neighbours. 
As many of them followed the occupation of 
travelling merchants or pedlars, answering in 
many respects to the colporteurs of modern 
days, they availed themselves of all favourable 
opportunities to instruct their customers in the 
doctrines of vital religion, not failing to exhibit 
the truth in marked and effective contrast to 
the corrupt and venal religionism of their day. 
It is admitted that their interpretation of sacred 
truth was conjoined with much that was de 
fective and even puerile ; but the Waldenses 
were true spiritual reformers, exhibiting, though 
in a yet more gloomy age, the leading views 
which afterwards distinguished the transition 
period of Luther and his followers. A section 
of these primitive Christians was designated 
Albigenses, probably deriving their name from 
Albi, a city in Languedoc. As corruption and 
calumny are ever allies, they were branded by 
their enemies with every crime of which human 
nature is capable ; with atheism, blasphemy, 
the worship of two gods, (in other words, Mani- 
cheeism,) and with the most contemptuous 
ridicule of all sacred things. Their real crime 
in the eyes of their accusers, was the superior 
purity of their lives, and the steady opposition 
they offered to the contemptible or corrupt 
practices of the Romish church. So long as 
they freely disseminated their tenets, Popery 
felt itself no longer safe. Inclination therefore 

A2 



10 THE INQUISITION. 

united with interest in urging the ecclesiastical 
powers of that time to check the progress of 
doctrines so dangerous. Nor was such a course 
without precedent in church history. The 
persecution of the early Christians, though 
begun by the heathens, had been largely pro 
moted by the Hebrew portion of the com 
munity, though the Jews found, too late, that 
in denouncing Christians they had been forging 
implements of destruction for themselves. The 
edicts of Constant ine first authorized their 
punishment by fire. The subsequent consti 
tutions of Theodosius provided for the employ 
ment of inquisitors and informers. St. Angus- 
tine had himself avowed opinions favourable to 
persecution ;* and the power of the popes had 
manifested itself by its severe repression of 
doctrines deemed heretical. It was not, there 
fore, probable that in so dark an age the Albi- 
genses would be allowed to escape ecclesiastiral 
severities ; and when the preaching of tli" 
Crusades had been received throughout Europe 
with a shout of almost unanimous enthus; 
it naturally followed that the arms omp! 
against the Saracens would be found appli 
to the extermination of doctrines very dili . 
from those of the great Oriental impostor, but 
even more dangerous to papal pr- :n,Mons. 
Accordingly, in the year 1103, pope . 
under m., then an exile from Rome, con* 
a council at Tours, composed of ecclesiastics 
and laics from various parts of England and 

EIUS. cxiii. 



ORIGIN AND FIRST ESTABLISHMENT. 11 

France, to devise measures for the extermination 
of heresy. The decrees passed by this assembly 
were stringent and severe. Heretics were to 
be watched, denounced, and cut off from the 
solaces of life for the good of their souls ; 
commerce with them was rigidly prohibited ; 
and these penalties were enforced by the threat 
of excommunication a course then much in 
fashion, and possibly more dreaded for its 
temporal than its spiritual consequences. These 
measures were followed up by other general 
councils, one of which was held in the church 
of the Lateran in Rome, and constituted the 
third Lateran council ; and another at Verona. 
In these assemblies canons were issued against 
the new heresies, punishments provided for 
such as favoured them, and the ecclesiastical 
and civil powers leagued together for their 
extermination. The execution of these decrees 
was in the mean time entrusted to the ordinary 
bishops, who were required to hold regular 
courts for the detection and punishment of 
heretics, the church pronouncing upon the 
crime whilst the secular magistrates inflicted 
the penalty. Thus, in the course of about 
twenty years, the rough outlines of the future 
system had been drawn out and approved, 
whilst nothing remained but to add to them 
those details which future necessities might 
demand. 

The committal of such a charge as that of 
punishing heretics to the bishops of the respec 
tive dioceses, was subsequently ascertained to be 



12 TI1C INQUISITION, 

extremely unsatisfactory. Such prelates were 
often apt to be influenced by the public opinion 
which prevailed in their respective dioceses. 
Nor was their own allegiance to the pontiff of 
Home always unquestionable. The administra 
tion of these rigorous measures varied, therefore, 
according to the character and position of the 
individual prelate. Ik-sides, Koine would not 
be long in discovering that it. was sometimes 
important to watch over the keepers of the 
faith themselves. Accordingly, pope Innocent m. 
took measures to give greater efficiency to the 
decretals already existing. 

He, therefore, in the year 1198, authorized 
Peter of Castelnnu, Arnauld, abbot of Citeaux, 
and his brother Ralph, (all Cistercian monks,) to 
preach against the Albigenses, having resolved 
to try the effect of temperate measures before 
proceeding to those of a sterner character. 
The contradictory accounts of their movements 
furnished by Roman Catholic historians lead 
to the conclusion that these efforts were attended 
by extremely small success. Their first modera 
tion speedily yielded to cruelty, and Peter <>1 
Castelnau lost his life in an outbreak pi. .yoked 
by his persecuting spirit. The death of this 
man, afterwards canonized by the pope, insti 
gated that pontiff to adopt measures of 
severity. Whilst, therefore, Simon d 
was endeavouring by fire and IW< rd t t- niiy 
mm into disciples-hip to the religion oi 
Innocent c ,1. other council, the fourth 

council of Lateian. He was j<in.d at this 



ORIGIN AND FIRST ESTABLISHMENT. 1 3 

convention bj two individuals, the name of 
one of whom has since become famous in the 
annals of Roman monkery and inquisitorial 
intolerance. 

The former of these was Foulques, bishop of 
Toulouse, whose diocese was in the centre of 
these Albigensian doctrines, and who, therefore, 
was likely to prove no negligent seconder of 
his master s measures. The other, then a young 
man, was in attendance upon Foulques. His 
name, originally a noble one, has passed into a 
proverb. 

Dominic de Guzman was born in 1170, at 
Calaroga, in Old Castile, and was descended 
from a very ancient family. It is related that 
before his birth his mother dreamed that she 
had become the parent of a whelp with a 
burning torch, which set the world on fire a 
dream which certainly presented no unapt em 
blem of the character and actions of her future 
son. At the age of fourteen, Dominic, who 
had already distinguished himself by his ascetic 
habits, became a pupil in the university of 
Salamanca; and at the age of twenty-one had 
acquired considerable reputation as a devotee. 
In 1198 he was appointed canon of Osma, and 
soon after accompanied his bishop in a visit to 
the districts of Languedoc, where the Albigenses 
were preaching. Here, by leave of the pope, 
he and his diocesan united themselves with the 
Cistercians in putting down the heretics. Some 
absurd fables are related of this period in 
Dominic s history. Among others, we are told 



14 THE INQUISITION. 

that St. Dominic, having drawn up an exposi 
tion of the Roman Catholic doctrine, gave his 
papers to the heretics that they might refute 
his propositions if they could. The Albigenses, 
after examining them, threw them into the 
flames. But the papers miraculously refused 
to burn. The experiment was (we are more 
over told) repeated in a public assembly, where 
several abbots were collected at a great dispu 
tation. Thrice was the document committed 
to the fire; thrice it came out unhurt* Such 
are the inventions which the Romish church 
does not hesitate to palm upon its deluded 
votaries ! Luther found the flames more 
tractable. 

In this man, thus brought by the bishop of 
Toulouse to the fourth Latcran council, Inno 
cent in. found a welcome adjutant for his 
schemes of ecclesiastical oppression Dominic 
earnestly desired to be the founder of a new 
order of monks. But as the council had aln.-ady 
determined rather to reform the existing bodies 
than to add new ones to their number, the 
proposition was not without its difficulties. But 
by substituting the name of " canons K 
for the more formal appellation by which the 
other establishments had been distingi 
the difficulty was evaded; and as Innocent, 
soon after this council, died, his successor, 
Honorius nr, issued bulls, constituting the 
bodies of Dominican and Franciscan monks, 
the former according to the regulations of 
Butler s Lives of tbc Saints. Art. Don. 



ORIGIN AND FIRST ESTABLISHMENT. 1 5 

Dominic de Guzman, the latter under the 
authority of Francis de Assisa. The peculiar 
duty of both was to preach against heretics; 
the Dominicans being appointed to the districts 
at the base of the Pyrenees, the Franciscans to 
those of the valleys of Italy. The instructions 
under which these mendicant monks were sent 
out, commanded them to investigate the tenets 
and numbers of the heretics, and to keep 
watch on the measures adopted by the bishops 
for the preservation of the doctrines of Rome. 
They were hence called Inquisitors, that name 
having been first given to Dominic by the 
authority of the pope himself. 

It is notorious how the character of men has 
become perpetuated in the systems they have 
originated. Of this the Inquisition is a re 
markable specimen. Dominic was a stern and 
fierce zealot, distinguished, according to the 
testimony of Campegius, (inquisitor-general of 
Ferrara,) by " the severity he made use of to 
stop the progress of these crimes." His own 
letters, produced by Paramus, show that he 
undertook his office with stern and resolute 
determination, resolving, by the severity with 
which he punished offenders, to terrify others 
from heretical professions. When he had been 
appointed by the papal mandate, he appeared 
in the church of St. Prullian in the midst of a 
great crowd, and in the sermon he preached on 
that occasion, he declared that " he was re 
solved to defend with his utmost vigour the 
doctrines of the faith, and that if the spiritual 






16 THE INQUISITION. 

and ecclesiastical arms were not sufficient for 
this end, lie was determined to call in the secular 
arm, to excite and compel the Catholic princes 
to take arms against heretics, that the very 
mention of them might be utterly destroyed." 
Pitiful is the sight of a poor vain bigot thus 
clothing himself in armour against the authority 
of the Lord of hosts! Not satisfied with these 
monkish agents, the pope commissioned his 
instruments to engage Philippe H., king of 
France, (Philippe Auguste,) with his son and 
his nobles, to aid them in exterminating heresy 
by force of arms, promising abundant indul 
gences as the appropriate rewards. But as the 
movement was distasteful to the bishops, and 
as the king had no great love for papal man 
dates, Philippe took no part in the a Hair, and 
many of the nobles of France, who regarded 
the Albigenses as peaceful and harmless sub 
jects, refused to join in measures which would 
have the effect of banishing them from their 
domains. 

At first these proceedings were submitted to 
no distinct tribunal, the efforts to detect heresy 
being irregular and promiscuous. Dominic, 
however, that he might level all the artillery 
of terror against the hapless Albigenses, formed 
*n order of laymen, called the Militia of Christ; 
" who, being approved by the p"pe, Constituted 
or members of the family 

x. Dominic. These wen: t.ik- n under the 
protection of the emperor, Frederic ir. 

Persecution, like other virulent diseases, is 



ORIGIN AND FIRST ESTABLISHMENT. 17 

one of rapid progress. The succeeding pope 
(Gregory ix.) made further advances in the 
organization of the Inquisition. lie called a 
council at Toulouse, in the year 1229, which, 
among other enactments, ordained that appointed 
persons, lay and clerical, should search for here 
tics, and that no territorial lord should harbour 
any suspected person. At the same time it was 
required that all the inhabitants of each district 
should be registered, and that every person 
arriving at a certain age should take an oath 
of adhesion to the Catholic faith, and of renun 
ciation of heresy. Failure in these respects, 
and in regularly communicating three times a 
year, exposed the delinquent to suspicion of 
heresy. The same council signalized itself by 
prohibiting the laity to read the Bible ; thus 
first authorizing that fearful sin, which must 
ever weigh so heavily in the scale of the Romish 
church s condemnation the denial of the bread 
of life to the ignorant and perishing sinner. 

The Albigenses were now effectually plied 
with the arguments of fire and faggot, and 
when apprehended were immured in dungeons, 
sometimes called " perpetual prisons of the 
wall," implying incarceration for life. Even 
those who recanted their heresy and avowed 
the Romish faith were frequently imprisoned ; 
or, in cases supposed to deserve less infamy, 
publicly whipped. 

The following letter of" Saint" Dominic will 
adequately illustrate the spirit in which such 
sentences were pronounced : 



1 8 THE INQUISITION. 

" Brother Dominic, the least of preachers, to 
all Christ s faithful people, to whom these pre 
sents shall come, greeting in the Lord : 

" By the authority of the Cistercian abbot, 
who hath appointed us this office, we have 
reconciled the bearer of these presents, Pontius 
Rogerius, converted by God s blessing from his 
heretical sect, charging and requiring him by 
the oath which he hath taken, that three Sun 
days, or three festival days, he be led by a 
priest, naked on his shoulders, from the coming 
into the town unto the church door, being 
whipped all the way. We also enjoin him that 
he abstain at all times from meat, eggs, cheese, 
and all things that proceed from flesh, except on 
the days of Easter, Whitsuntide, and Christmas, 
on which days we command him to eat flesh 
for i\ denial of his former error. We will that 
he keep three Lents in one year, abstaining 
even from fish ; and that he fast three days 
every week, always refraining from fish, oil, 
and wine, except bodily infirmity or hard 
labour in harvest time require a dispensation. 
We will have him wear friar s coats, with two 
small crosses sewn on his two breasts. Let him 
every day hear mass if opportunity may serve, 
and on all holidays ; let him go to vespers to 
church. He shall observe all the other canon 
ical hours, by day and by night, whtjrever he 
be, and shall then fay his orisons, that is, seven 
ti mo a day he shall say ten j :>fernosters to- 
iT, and twenty at midnight. Every first 
day of the month let him show these our letters 



ORIGIN AND FIRST ESTABLISHMENT. 1 9 

to the curate of the town of Cervicum, whom 
we command diligently to observe what kind 
of life this bearer leads ; whom, if he should 
neglect to observe these our injunctions, we 
declare to be perjured and excommunicated, 
and will have him taken for such."* 

This gradual establishment of inquisitorial 
power was attended by scenes of outrage and 
enormity which, though not perhaps strictly 
forming part of the history of the Inquisition 
itself, strongly illustrate the spirit of the system 
from which it emanated, and leave a track of 
blood to witness from the ground against the 
church of Rome. The ravages of Simon de 
Montfort, the English earl of Leicester ; the 
barbarity of Arnault! , abbot of Citeaux, who, 
when told at the siege of Beziers that there 
were many Catholics in the town, commanded 
that all should be killed, declaring that " God 
would know his own ;" the concentration of 
leaders from all parts of Europe against the 
hapless Albigenses ; the infamy of Foulques, 
bishop of Toulouse, who jested with indescrib 
able barbarity on the sufferings of those he 
made his victims constitute in their combina 
tion a series of atrocities perhaps unequalled in 
the history of the world. When Beziers was 
taken, the massacre was universal there was 
nothing left living within it ; and pillage, deso 
lation, and death were triumphant in the dis 
tricts around. At Minerve a large fire was 
lighted before the citadel, and in the face of its 
* Limborch a Inquisition, chap. x. Ed. W6. 



20 THE INQUISITION. 

flames the Albigcnses were exhorted to be con 
verted or die. One hundred and eighty chose 
the latter alternative. These enormities con 
tinued during many years, the monks of St. 
Dominic being the executors of the decrees 
issuing from the council of the Lateran. It is 
related by Bzovius, that in the beginning of the 
thirteenth century multitudes of heretics were 
burned in Germany, France, and Italy, and 
that eighty persons were seized in Strasburg 
alone. " If any of these denied their heresy, 
friar Conrade, of Marpuy, an apostolical inqui 
sitor of the order of Predicants, put them to the 
trial of the fire-ordeal, and as many of them as 
were burned by the iron he delivered over to 
the secular power to be burned as heretics ; so 
that all who were accused and put to this trial, 
a few excepted, were condemned to the flames." 
The contentions which existed between the 
papal and imperial authorities prevented, how 
ever, the progress of the Inquisition in Germany. 

Traces of the existence of this sanguinary 
tribunal are found in connexion with the his 
tories of Sardinia, Servia, and Syria. 

The Inquisition was introduced by pope 
Innocent iv. into Italy under Vivianus Burgo- 
mensis and Peter of Verona. The latter was 
the proto-martyr of the inquisitors. Soon after 
his appointment, as he was jourm -yinj from 
Como to Milan, in prosecution of his ollico, he 
was attacked and murdered. Tin- church of 
Iiome canonized him, and the Iu<jui>ition - 
after regarded him as their sainted protector, 



ORIGIN AND FIRST ESTABLISHMENT. 21 

calling a class of their servants " Co-Brothers 
of Peter the Martyr," in honour of his death. 
So unpopular was the Inquisition in Italy, in 
consequence of the cruelty of its administra 
tion, (especially against those who were accused 
of magic,) that dangerous tumults arose in 
Brescia and Mantua ; whilst in Rome the popu 
lace broke open the prisons, and burned the 
building to the ground. 

It is needless to specify the details connected 
with the introduction of the inquisitorial appa 
ratus into Hungary and Poland. 

Though Venice could not avoid the intro 
duction of this system, the jealousy of the senate 
prevented its ever acquiring a permanent influ 
ence, in that state. 

Owing to the disputes between the pope and 
the king respecting the appointment of . inqui 
sitors, Naples wholly escaped the terrible inflic 
tion ; nor could it ever obtain a footing in the 
Low Countries. 

The introduction of the Inquisition into Spain 
will be related in a subsequent chapter. The 
remainder of this present one will be devoted 
mainly to France, the original scat of its power. 

About the middle of the thirteenth century, 
Raymond of Pegnaforte, a Dominican, drew 
np, by command of pope Gregory ix., a com 
pendium of the various laws enacted against 
heresy. Several additions were subsequently 
made to this digest, which constituted the basis 
of the inquisitorial code, and at a synod subse 
quently held at Tarracona many new edicts 



22 TITF. INQUISITION. 

were added to the former. The tribunal of the 
Inquisition was first erected at Toulouse in 
1233, and its administration was entrusted to 
the monks of St. Dominic. The establishment 
of the old Inquisition is due to the pope who 
first gave to the doctrine of transubstantiation 
its regular form. It appears that early in the 
fourteenth century an inquisitorial prison ex 
isted in Toulouse, and that periodical demon 
strations, not very dissimilar to those which 
in later times were called autos da fe, terrified 
and warned the hapless inhabitants. Every 
offence which might, by natural or forced con 
struction, bear the likeness of misprision of 
heresy, as well as of heresy itself, appears to 
have awakened the jealousy of the lynx-eyed 
familiars of those distant days. Union with the 
Waldenses in acts of prayer ; harbouring the 
heretical pastors in houses ; visiting them in 
prison ; employment of the same prayers as 
those used by the simple teachers ; hearing or 
reading the Scriptures in the common tongue ; 
even the act of accepting a needle from one of 
them, are cited in this document as crimes to be 
punished, often by burning alive. In one case 
we have the record of a priest of the Romish 
church, who had been received secretly into 
the society of these denounced heretics, though 
he had not ceased, however at variance with 
his true convictions, to minister at the altar of 
his mother church. He was denoun 
tried, but released upon his \ 
ance. Yet he united again with hi 



ORIGIN AND FIRST ESTABLISHMENT. 23 

friends, and was once more brought before the 
tribunal of the Inquisition. As his diocesan 
bishop was dead, there was no power by which 
he could be removed from his office except the 
pope s, who issued a special bull for the pur 
pose. The long and solemn process of degra 
dation was inflicted even the tonsure was 
erased by the shaving of his head, and he was 
then thrown into the fire and consumed. 

Even those who renounced their heresies 
appear to have been condemned to perpetual 
imprisonment by this Toulousian tribunal. Nor 
were even the dead free from the vengeance of 
their persecutors. The errors of the Waldenses 
caused their very bones to be ransacked in their 
graves. Then, as since, the vengeance of Rome 
pursued the body beyond the grave. 

The visitor to Toulouse is yet shown "Le 
Couvent de Tancienne Inquisition," on the right 
bank of the Garonne; and, till the end of the 
last century, the cell was exhibited which 
St. Dominic inhabited when on a visit to the 
city to plant there his upas tree, since so widely 
extended, full of dark foliage and prolific of de 
structive fruit. Some localities become morally 
pestilential : the miasma of evil, once caught, 
is long retained. It was so with Toulouse. 
The cruelties inflicted on French Protestants 
lasted till the year 1761, when persecution 
struck its last blow in the cruel and sanguinary 
death of Galas, and roused a public indignation 
under which Rome long trembled. Yet it was 
Toulouse which wrote en one of its churches 



24 THE INQUISITION. 

the church of St. James of Compostella " Non 
est in toto saitctior orbe /on/s;" "There is no 
holier spot in all this world." Self-delusion is 
often self-destruction. 

But it was not on heretics alone that this 
Toulonsian tribunal exercised the power which, 
unlike that of the first apostles, was given for 
" destruction," not for " edification." The ava 
lanche which fell on the heads of the Parisian 
Jews in the reign of St. Louis, in 1230, had its 
consequences in Toulouse ; for, in continuation 
of those outrages, the Inquisition of that city 
entered the houses of the descendants of Abra 
ham, seized their Hebrew books, especially the 
copies of the Talmud, and burned them in 
public. One might suppose the fables of that 
work to be too absurd to be regarded ns 
dangerous. But, when learning was small and 
superstition great, the Cabbala* of the Jews 
was dreaded as something most fearful; and if 
magic have any power, it must be confessed 
that the Mishna and Gemara contain enough 
stories of its power to alarm the least cre 
dulous. 

Nor were the Jews alone liable to this accu 
sation of sorcery. The authority which dealt 
with Pietro d Apono as a magician, (\ve decide 
not whether he were foolish enough to believe 
in its reality without adci-nate evidence, or 
juggler enough to practise what !: did not 

Wlifn Mirnrxlola wn ! .iti<i i nn.l 

. ho n-kii| in a jnil>lisl:i-(| \\ork, " What u 
( al)bala?" "S " Cabbala wa a wicked . 

who wrote gniiut Christ. Tbc Cabbaliati arc his follower*." 



ORIGIN AND FIRST ESTABLISHMENT. 25 

believe,) and which tortured him till life could 
bear no more, and till he died in prison, demon 
strated its zeal in many parts of France. _ 

Among the inquisitors of this new institution 
in the year 1250, Peter lleines obtained a 
disastrous celebrity. He was busily occupied 
in carrying into effect that decree of the council 
of Toulouse which forbade the laity to possess a 
copy of the Scriptures in the vulgar tongue. 
Under his administration the Waldenses appear 
to have suffered the most grievous barbarities. 
Such numbers were about this time apprehended, 
as to cause a complaint from the archbishops of 
Aix, Aries, and Narboune, that they found it 
difficult, not only to defray the charge of main 
taining so many prisoners, but even to furnish 
materials out of which a sufficient number of 
prisons might be built. In Italy, a branch of 
the Albigenses, at the close of the thirteenth 
century, assumed the title of Apostolics ; and in 
the commencement of the fourteenth, one of 
their number, Sngarelli, having been seized, 
was condemned and burned as an arch-heretic. 
As the sect to which he belonged was very 
numerous, Clement v., then pope, sent among 
the Apostolics preaching inquisitors, who (en- 
lumniously, no doubt) returned to him a most 
unfavourable report of the practices and num 
bers of these new dissentients. A crusade was 
accordingly proclaimed against them, and an 
army was sent for their extermination. It 
succeeded. If < the blood of the martyrs^is the 
seed of the church," it is not always in the 



26 



THE INQUISITION. 



literal moaning of that proverb. The extirpa 
tion of the true reformed faith from Spain, 
irance, and Belgium, stands as a manifest 
proof to the contrary. 

In the year 1307, a new body, which had 
been once regarded as the main support of 
the Christian religion against the heathen and 
infidel Saracens, and which had shed their best 
blood in its defence the Knights Templars- 
fell under the suspicion of heretical tendencies 
and by a coup d etat of Philip the Fair of 
France, (who had been offended by this order 
because they had furnished the preceding pope 
with money to carry on war against him,) were 
seized in great numbers and thrown into prison. 
In addition to the crime of heresy, the Templars 
were accused of licentious and abominable enor 
mities, of secret alliance with the Saracens, and 
of an intention to deliver Christendom into the 
hands of its enemies. The papal chair was at 
this time filled by Clement v., who, being a crea 
ture of Philip, and, moreover, a prisoner in the 
hands of the king, could not take the measures 
necessary for their defence, though extremely 
desirous of sparing a body which had proved 
itself so useful to his order. As the Templars 
were little guided by any true principle, and as 
many of them had been extremely licentious in 
their practice, the charges against them were 
not without a colour of probability, and some 
of their number, when imprisoned and tl 
with extreme tortuivs, j.urclia^-.l tlu-ir liberty 
at the price of stigmatizing their companions. 



ORIGIN AND FIRST ESTABLISHMENT. 27 

To remove the scruples of the pope, Philip 
caused seventy-two of these confessing Tem 
plars to be brought before him. Bub the 
course of their examination showed with suffi 
cient distinctness the measures which had been 
adopted to secure their evidence. One of them 
asserted he had been tortured by intoxicated 
men. Another declared that he had undergone 
extreme severities at Carcassone, and when 
asked why he did not then tell the truth, 
replied, " Because I did not then recollect it, 
but I prayed the seneschal to confer with my 
companions, and when I had deliberated with 
them I recollected." In reply to the charges 
brought against them, the Templars asserted 
that such imputations were utterly false, and 
could only have been made by men who feared 
the. consequences of speaking the truth. Most 
authors, not French, have admitted the fallacy 
of the charges. 

By the joint authority of Clement and Philip 
a council was called at Vienne to determine 
respecting the continuance of the Order of the 
Temple, and the pope issued a bull, entitled, 
" Faciens Miscricordiam" by which princes 
and prelates were summoned to attend the 
council and to assist him in his inquiries. At 
this council several of the accusers of the 
Templars retracted, one of them declaring that 
he had been tortured before a burning fire till 
the bones came off" his feet, and another that he 
bad been three times subjected to the question, 
and had been kept on bread and water for 



28 THE INQUISITION. 

thirty-six weeks. Whilst this trial was pend 
ing, the archbishop of Seas, with disgraceful 
servility, performed an act of which Philip was 
the real instigator. This was the putting to 
death of fifty- four Templars who had declared 
the innocence of the Order. These wretched 
men were dragged from prison to find the piles 
already prepared for their execution, and the 
torches flaming. An offer was made of rescue 
to those who would confess the guilt of their 
body in vain, and equally vain was the remon 
strance of their friends, who entreated them to 
avoid the impending destruction. They died 
with heroic courage, asserting to the last 
moment their innocence. Jacob Mola, the 
grand-master and general of the Order, ad 
dressed the people at the place of his execution 
in these words : 

" As the end of life is not the time to utter 
falsehoods, even though advantage would follow, 
1 swear by everything sacred, that what has 
been alleged as a crime against the Templars, 
and is now referred in the sentence pronounced 
against me, is false and unfounded." 

These proceedings were confined to France, 
and no capital punishment was inflicted on the 
Templars in any other kingdom a strong 
presumptive proof of their innocence of these 
actual charges. The Order of the Templars 
was however suppressed, though, four days 
.-.fur its suppression, Clement v. issued a 1 nil 
in which he declared that the proof against the 
body was far from positive. 



OIUGIN AND FIRST ESTABLISHMENT. 29 

The Beguins next came under the notice of 
the Inquisition. These men were a sect of 
Franciscan monks, who, disgusted with their 
brethren because they did not observe their 
professed practice of poverty, and maintaining 
that not even the edicts of the pope himself 
could release them from their vow, were 
declared to be guilty of heresy, and were 
proceeded against with the utmost rigour under 
a decree of the pope. Home has ever looked 
upon all reformers as heretics of the Avorst 
cla-ss. In 1318, four of these Beguins were 
convicted and burned alive. Their death was 
followed by that of many others who partici 
pated in their opinions, and regarded them as 
martyrs for the truth. This persecution lasted 
during many years, and continued at intervals 
until even the time of Luther. Many serious 
errors appear to have intruded themselves 
among the disciples of this sect, for an account 
of which the reader is referred to the third 
volume of Mosheim s Ecclesiastical History. 

Though the Inquisition was thus first esta 
blished on the French soil, it was unable to 
secure a permanent footing in that country in 
consequence of the violent altercations which 
perpetually arose between the pope and the 
reigning monarchs of that powerful kingdom. 
The contentions, especially between Philip the 
Fair and pope Boniface, which ended in the 
excommunication of the monarch, were ill 
calculated to confirm the power of so tyrannous 
an ecclesiastical institution. 



30 TI1E INQUISITION. 

Yet when, in the next reign but one, certain 
nobles of Dauphiny protected the Waldenses, 
the reigning pope addressed himself to Charles 
IV., soliciting his support for the Inquisition. 
This was granted, till, in consequence of the 
zeal of the persecutors, the prisons were so 
glutted with victims, that it was found no 
easy matter to provide food for the miserable 
inmates. To meet this difficulty, the pope 
appropriated part of the funds of the church 
for the maintenance of these ecclesiastical 
prisoners, and offered large indulgences to 
those who should aid in the erection of new 
prisons. 

That the proto-reformation which began 
under Wyclifte and IIuss gave abundant em 
ployment to the cruel energies of the Inquisition 
scarcely admits of question, though history has 
not separated its special acts from those general 
enormities which distinguished the Romish 
church at that period. The Inquisition doubt 
less instigated those proceedings of the Council 
of Constance by which John Huss was commit 
ted to the flames in 1414, and by which Wycliffe s 
bones were exhumed and thrown into the Swill 
at Lutterworth. It is indeed impossible to think 
of this wide-spread engine of desolation and death, 
this ecclesiastical Thuggisin which thus dill 
its l.aiu ltil influence among so many of the 

s <>f Kurup" , without a shudder. Tl. 
to the provi<l :. t ( 

al\v ;v( they are sometimt -sabhonvnt. 

a those who might admire the bilky undulu- 



ORIGIN AND FIRST ESTABLISHMENT. 31 

tion and glistening colours of the serpent, fly 
with instinctive terror when they hear the 
rattle which proclaims his venomous character. 
The old Inquisition had not indeed all the fully 
developed powers of its successor, but it exer 
cised its influence in a darker age, and that fact 
could not fail to magnify its despotism. In our 
own days persecution is, we would fain be 
lieve, comparatively a harmless thing. Even 
when it exists, the facilities given for the trans 
mission of intelligence from point to point, the 
wide area through which public opinion be 
comes excited, the concentration of efforts and 
remonstrances on any single point,^ must of 
necessity curtail, if these cannot entirely pre 
vent, its free range of action. Of this the cruel 
punishment of the Madiai may afford an illus 
tration. The voice which all Protestant Europe 
has uttered regarding that transaction, though 
for the present it may seem powerless, will long 
resound in the ears of the Borne-ridden despots 
who would " weary out the saints of the Most 
High." But we cannot look back to the history 
of persecution in the dark ages without unmiti 
gated horror. When men stood comparatively 
alone when the feudal system bound the vassal 
in iron subjection to his lord when no press 
thundered forth the case of the sufferer when 
no post transmitted the tale of his woe when 
no lightning element was ready to convey the 
news of his injury with the rapidity of thought 
from north to south and from east to west 
what must have been the facilities which a 



32 THE IKQUISITIOH. 

persecuting religion then possessed for its dark 
and deadly work ! 

Yet dark as the scene is, all is not darkness. 
Many of these sufferers hated, denounced, 
tortured, destroyed had sources of consolation 
within them of which the world knows nothing. 
They knew the picture on one side to be dark, 
but they knew how to turn if. Whilst they 
bled or withered in p. death of anguish, they 
felt that they were the r-ul benefactors of their 
posterity. 

"They never fail who die 

In t great cnnsc; the blork may soak their gore, 
rncir heads may sodden in the smi, their limbs 
Be strung to city pates and castle walls 
IJut htill their spirit walks abroad." 

"We are not ungrateful when we think of the 
civil and social liberties which such suflerings 
procured for those who should follow. But we 
prize at an infinitely higher rate the lesson 
they have left us of the reality, the vitality, the 
energy, the fortifying influence, the indestruc 
tible power of the doctrines of salvation by 
faith in the merits of the Redeemer s sacrifice. 
Every cry which torture wrung from the suffer 
ers wakened sonic drowsy member of a false 
church from his dreamy slumbers. The flames 
by which they were consumed poured a blaze 
of detecting light upon the evil practices and 
anti-Christian observances which without them 
would have remained unknown. In tin.- provi 
dence of God, the Inquisition whi>-!i tdturert 
the Albigenses taught the Lollard 
which would have exterminated the i 



ORIGIN AND FIRST ESTABLISHMENT. 83 

roused the spirit of the Reformation. " I shall 
not all die " may be the motto, not only of a 
heathen moralist, but of the Christian martyr. 

All is not gloom. Not a sigh of God s true 
servants passed unheeded by their Master ! 
" Are they not in Thy book ? " Their passage 
from earth t heaven was terrible, but it was 
often brief. There is a recompense. Between 
the persecutor and the persecuted who could 
now hesitate which side to choose ? Let U3 
learn. It is well to live for ultimate issues, 
It is well to live, not for to-day or to-morrow, 
but for a whole hereafter. And to bear the 
cross as Christ himself did is the only road to 
being partakers with him of the crown for 
which he died. 

Romanism has thus served to develope true 
Christianity. The executioner who severs the 
head of his victim brings to light, the marvels 
of its physical construction. But shall we 
thank him for his lesson ? 



84 THE INQUISITION. 



CHAPTER II. 

APPARATUS AND PROCESSES OF THE INQUISITION. 

THE operations of the Inquisition have consider 
ably varied in the earlier, compared with the 
later periods of its history. Its general character 
has, indeed, been always one; but, on its first 
establishment, its vigour was chiefly dependent 
upon the energy and zeal of individual adminis- 
trants, rather than on the concentrated powers 
of a united and extensive organization. In the 
first instance, the tribunal did not trample down 
all considerations of ecclesiastical rank, nor 
did it then set at defiance, as it afterwaidi 
learned to do, the remonstrances of pontiffs 
themselves. Though the terrible engine of 
seci esy was not, in its earlier operations, entirely 
unknown, this had not yet become a distin 
guished element of its power. It is from the 
close of the fifteenth century that we must 
begin to recognise the completed form of this 
tribunal. 

It is not wonderful that the influence of 
public opinion should have chocked, in modern 
days, the practices and exhibitions of this 



APPARATUS AND PROCESSES. 35 

tremendous engine of iniquity. The position 
now occupied by the Inquisition is, therefore, 
most studiously enveloped in dark mystery, 
from the midst of which, however, there occa 
sionally emanate startling disclosures, oj, at 
least, expressive groans. This elaborate con 
cealment of its present character renders it de 
sirable for us to describe the Inquisition in the 
past, rather than in the present tense; though 
we caution the reader against drawing any 
inference from this circumstance. In the sequel 
\ve shall endeavour to place the question as to 
the modern existence of the "holy office" in 
its true light. Till then, we wish to be under 
stood as speaking, to employ a legal term, 
" without prejudice" as to the fact of its modern 
character. 

The essential intolerance of the church of 
Rome is equally manifest and enormous. Ac 
cording to its canon law, all variation from the 
prescribed tenets of that church is criminal, 
and deserving of punishment, both spiritual 
and temporal; and every pope and archbishop 
is understood to be invested with power and 
jurisdiction for the extirpation of heresies.* 
The fourth council of Toledo, which has been 
sometimes quoted as a specimen of Eoman 
Catholic liberality, declared that Jews baptized 
ly force should be compelled to hold to the 

* The reader is here reminded of a remarkable and instruc 
tive correspondence which took place not long since between 
i Presbyterian clergyman and a recently-appointed cardinal, 

U r W "V U V vhich the la"er was invested as 
the Romish church. 



30 THE INQUISITION. 

faitli, lest the name of God should be blas 
phemed.* The following was the decree of the 
fifth council : " We promulge this doctrine 
pleasing to God, that whosoever hereafter shall 
succeed to the kingdom, shall not ascend the 
throne till he has .sworn, among other oaths, to 
permit no man to live in his kingdom who is 
not a Catholic ; and if, after he has taken the 
reins of government, he shall violate this pro 
mise, let him be anathema marcmatka in the 
sight of the eternal God, and become fuel of 
the eternal fire."| The council of Lateran, 
under pope Innocent ur., decreed that "all 
heresy and heretics should be anathematized, 
and these being condemned, must be left to the 
secular power to be punished." J At the same 
time secular oflicers are required to swear that 
" they will endeavour, bond fide and with all 
their might, to exterminate from every part of 
their dominion all heretical subjects, univer 
sally, that are marked out by the church." 
The last council of Lateran decreed, " that all 
false Christians, and those iVho think ill con 
cerning faith, of whatever people or nation they 
may be, as well as heretics or persons polluted 
with any stain of heresy, or Judaizers, be 
entirely excluded from the company of believers 
in Christ. . . . We ordain that proceedings be 
taken against them. . . . And they who are 
guilty of this crime, and legitimately convicted, 

* Hlanro WliitrV 1 :.inst CatlioliciMn, p. 254. 

t ( Jirrnn. 
% Ibid, p. 602. 



APPARATUS AND PROCESSES. 37 

shall be punished with due penalties. But it 
is our pleasure that the relapsed be dealt with 
without any hope of pardon or of remission." 
And the following passage may be here intro 
duced from the annotations of the Douay Bible: 
" The good must tolerate the evil when it is 
so strong that it cannot be redressed without 
danger and disturbance of the whole church. 
. . . Otherwise, where il men (be they hereticks 
or other malefactours) may be punished and 
suppressed without disturbance and hazard of 
the good, they may and ought by publike 
authority, either spiritual or temporal, to be 
chastised or executed." * In coincidence with 
such sentiments, the creed of pope Pius iv. 
speaks of " this true Catholic faith, out of 
which none can be saved." And Aquinas, 
dignified by the Romanists with the honours of 
a saint, and regarded as a special authority 
among the learned of the Komish church, 
declares: " Sicut in voto aliqud necessitatis sen 
honestatis causa potest fieri dispensatio, ita et in 
juramento" " As" with regard to vows, a dis 
pensation may take place for the sake of neces 
sity or of honesty, so it may also with regard 
to oaths. I It cannot be, therefore, a matter 
of surprise, if a church claiming to possess 
powers of so extensive an order, has deemed 
itself qualified to regulate at its pleasure, and 

* Douay Bible, 16, 33, 1816. Capper s Acknowledged Doc- 
trines of the Church of Rome. 

t Secunda Secnndac, Quest. Ixxxix. Art. ix. See some 
striking and instructive observations on this subject in 
" Blanco White s Evidence against Catholicism," p. 58. 



38 THE INQUISITION. 

by whatever penalties it may have seen fit to 
impose, the religious opinions of all whom it has 
tyrannically regarded as subject to its sway. 

More effectually to accomplish such ends, the 
" apostolical inquisitors" were early appointed 
by the pope as "the supreme maintainers of 
the faith," and were invested with complete 
jurisdiction over cases of alleged departure from 
the truth. The appointment to this office might 
be made either by papal word or rescript. Of 
the latter mode, the following is one of the 
forms : " That the office of the Inquisition 
against heretics may bo more effectually dis 
charged, we command your discretion by our 
apostolic writings, enjoining you, by the remis 
sion of your sins, to execute the aforesaid office 
which we commit to you by our apostolic 
authority, in the love of God without any 
fears of men, putting on the spirit of strength 
from on high." 

The powers entrusted to the INQUISITOR- 
GENKUAL were enormously great. He was the 
head of the supreme council, which in its turn 
exercised a complete control over all inferior 
courts. He was irremovable except by the 
pope who appointed him. Occasionally the 
monarch nominated the inquisitor-general, and 
the supreme pontiff confirmed the appointment. 
It rested with this officer to choose the INTERIOR 
INQUISITORS, but subject to the papal auction. 
These functionaries v ,.j,t jy um a n 

ordinary ecclesiastical juriMdiction. They bore 
the title of " most reverend," and were 04110! in 



APPARATUS AND PROCESSES. 39 

rank to bishops. In matters of difficulty the 
whole council of inquisitors adjudged on the 
case. The unlawful use of their powers ren 
dered these officers liable to be removed by the 
prelates of heir order, though the pope might 
take the judgment into his own hands, and 
award punishment according to his pleasure. 
But such penalties were usually administered 
with caution and in secresy, on the pretext that, 
as the office was much hated by offenders, it 
was not wise to expose the institution to con 
tempt. This plea for the mitigation of penal 
ties on ecclesiastical offenders is familiar to all 
who have studied the genius and practices of 
the Roman Catholic religion. 

A large district might require the aid of 
VICARS or cosiMissiONERS, the final sentence being 
usually pronounced by the inquisitor-general. 

As the original inquisitors were friars, and 
therefore, however learned in divinity, might 
be often inexperienced in law, they were re 
quired to coujoin with them canonists and 
jurists, to whom was given the title of ASSESSORS 
or COUNCILLORS. Nor was such aid unneces 
sary, for it not unfrequently happened that the 
inquisitors betrayed the grossest ignorance on 
doctrinal points respecting which they were 
required to adjudicate. Dr. Geddes gives some 
almost incredible instances of their stupidity. 
He records that the origin of the word hcereticus, 
(derived, as every schoolboy knows, from the 
Greek word a /peo-ts, opinion, choice?) was inter 
preted by some of them as having its origin in 



40 THE INQUISITION. 

the two Latin words crro and reel us, because " a 
heretic errs from what is right ;" and by others 
as derived from adha reo, because heresy is 
" the obstinate adherence to an error."* The 
inquisitors were often ignorant of the plainest 
passages of the Scriptures, and even of the 
canons of their own church. To prevent such 
mistakes they were permitted to call to their 
councils those who were versed in divinity or in 
civil Jaws, as the case might be, and having 
heard their opinion they determined the case 
for themselves. Such advisers were sworn to 
secresy. 

The accuser in the office of the inquisition 
was called the PROMOTER FISCAL, who prepared 
the charge, swearing that in laying it he was 
not instigated by malice. He marshalled the 
witnesses, and produced all other proofs deemed 
requisite ; only he was forbidden to exercise 
his oflice in his native district. This officer 
was not, however, allowed to be present when 
the nature of the sentence was under deli 
beration. 

The NOTARIES were the secretaries of the tri 
bunal. It was their office, not merely to pre 
serve the minutes of the examinations, but to 
record every subordinate, circumstance which 
occurred during the interrogation, such as hesi 
tations, changes of countenance, faltering of 

Trnrt, vol i. p. 425. " It was n proverb in 

Portugal that children li> wriv rompi tent ID nutliing ele 
were fit for inquUitors. A SpunUh j< st run tl.us : - \Mi:it 
maw an inquisitor? A. One crucifix, two candle-: 

i.a ftne blockheads. " 



APPARATUS AND PROCESSES. 41 

the voice, etc. They were ordinarily lay men, 
and were also sworn to secresy. 

As the trials conducted by the Inquisition 
frequently involved property to a large amount, 
RECEIVERS or TREASURERS held the amounts con 
fiscated, subject to the pleasure of the tribunal. 

The APPARITORS or PURSUIVANTS were the 
executive servants of the " holy office," as the 
FAMILIARS were its detective police. 

With the exception of the officials of tho 
tribunal itself and bishops, (who might be de 
nounced, but could only be condemned by a 
superior power,) the extent of the authority of 
the Inquisition was almost unbounded. Heresy, 
Judaism, sorcery, necromancy, magic, Quietism, 
Lutheranism, freemasonry, or whatever might 
be suspected to come under any of these desig 
nations ; in short, every opinion differing or 
supposed to differ from the absolute standard of 
the Romish church, was subject to its inquiries, 
impeachment, and punishment. The armed 
baron, who, with twilight sagacity, began dimly 
to suspect the errors of his all-grasping church ; 
the wealthy proprietor, the amount of whose 
amassed riches might aid in some new scheme 
of ecclesiastical oppression ; the tonsured priest, 
whose awakening convictions had outrun the 
prudence of his spiritual position ; the father 
or mother of the family, who had been more 
concerned about the salvation of children s souls 
than the mere dogmas of creeds and confessions ; 
the hapless virgin , whose affections had been fixed 
on some heretical lover ; the destitute labourer, 
B 2 



42 



THE INQUISITION. 



who had sought in a reformed faith a consola 
tion denied him by the church of Home ; the 
careless talker, whose gibes or sarcasms had 
pierced too sharply some well-guarded error; 
the friend of liberty, who longed to break the 
manacles of a dreaded despotism, and to set 
himself and his country free ; these, and a 
thousand varieties besides, were the objects on 
which the lynx-eyed malignity of papal pene 
tration was not slow to rest, and whom it did its 
utmost to sweep out of existence. 

Perhaps no better notion of the proceedings 
of the Inquisition can be obtained than that 
derived from the " Directory " of Nicholas 
Eymeric, inquisitor-general of Aragon in 1536. 
which constitutes the basis of all the subse 
quent proceoilipTS of that tribunal. It was 
sanctioned by tux gory xm., and "has served 
as a model for all the regulations which have 
been in force in Spain, Italy, and Portugal, and 
as authority for all who have written on the 
subject."* To the information derived from 
this Directory may be added that of Llorente, 
who was, previously to the publication of his 
work, secretary to the Inquisition, and chan 
cellor of the university of Toledo. The latter 
has furnished a complete account of the mode 
of procedure adopted by the modern Inquisi 
tion. We shall have frequent occasion to avail 
ourselves of his information. 

The 1 ..rose, chlier out 

of an accusation directly i 

Puigblanch, cbap. iv. 



APPARATUS AND PROCESSES. 43 

individual person,* or from information ob 
tained more stealthily. The former course was 
decidedly discountenanced ; it was too open to 
suit the purposes of the treacherous tribunal 
In case of "information" furnished to the holy 

>ince the witness swore not to reveal the inter 
rogatories that had been put to him, nor the 
nature of his replies. Though, in the eyes of 
the inquisitor the matter might appear alto 
gether groundless, it was not therefore to be 
concluded that it was unworthy of credence 
since future occurrences might throw licrht 
upon what at present seemed to be entirely 
contradictory. It o f re n happened, however, 
that the matter of suspicion was derived from 
information which had transpired at some pre 
vious trial ; in which case it was competent to 
the inquisitor to question any persons whom he 
might cite, provided there were two of them to 
corroborate the point. It was not necessary 
these witnesses should state facts of which 
they were cognizant; even hearsay evidence 
was fully admissible. It was the object of the 
tribunal to keep these witnesses almost entirely 

L the dark, and this was done by asking 

hem m the most general terms possible, whe- 

her vhey had ever seen or heard anything which 

was, or appeared to be, contrary to the Catholic 

faith or the rights of the Inquisition. Llorente 






4-L THE INQUISITION. 

declares that when the notary had written down 
the allegations of these persons, though in the 
course of doing so he often heightened the 
colour of their depositions, they never failed, on 
his notes being read over to them, to approve 
all which he had recorded.* 

The testimony of witnesses was not damaged 
by the ill character they bore. Though they 
were heretics, or infamous in the eyes of the 
law, they could give testimony against a cul 
prit, but not in his favour. If the witness re 
tracted his first allegation, it was held, never 
theless, to be of force. In obtaining informa 
tion regarding suspected persons no tie of 
nature was respected. The servant might in 
form against the master, or the son against the 
father. But though such witnesses were suffi 
cient to accuse they were by no means allowed 
to exculpate. Every advantage was taken of 
the malicious motives which might prompt one 
person to become the accuser of another. The 
witness was wrought upon by fear, by interest, 
and by the sense of what was due to God, or 
(which was represented as being the same 
thing) to the holy tribunal. As he was sworn 
to secresy, a bad man would be encouraged in 
bearing false evidence ; and lie who had once 
been brought before the tribunal durst not 
communicate anything which had passed within 
its walls. Townsend, in his " Journey through 
Spain," relates that a Dutch consul, with whom 
be was acquainted in 1787, resolutely refused 
Llorente, chap. ix. 



APPARATUS AND PROCESSES. 45 

to make any statement regarding his imprison 
ment in the Inquisition at Barcelona, though 
his confinement had occurred thirty-five years 
before, and that he was agitated when any 
questions were asked of him on that subject ; 
while his fellow in prison, M. Falconet, though 
he had been seized when a boy, was turned 
grey by the fright of his capture, and never, to 
the day of his death, could be prevailed upon 
to communicate the details of his confinement. 
The charge against these parties really -was, 
that the latter had destroyed a picture of the 
Virgin, which the Dutch consul had witnessed 
without accusing his friend.* 

The information having been obtained, and 
having been laid before the supreme council, 
the arrest of the accused speedily followed. 
Ministers of the tribunal, among whom it was 
necessary that the treasurer should be one, (for 
the purpose of taking charge of the confis 
cation,) proceeded usually at dead of night to 
the house of the alleged culprit. " The thun 
derbolt launched from the black and angry 
cloud," says a writer, " strikes not with such 
alarm as the sound of * DELIVER YOURSELF UP A 
PRISONER TO THE INQUISITION I Astonished and 
trembling, the unwary citizen hears the dismal 
voice ; a thousand different affections at once 
seize upon his panic-struck frame, and he re 
mains perplexed and motionless. His life in 
danger his deserted wife and orphan children 
eternal infamy, the only patrimony that now 
* Tcwuscnd s Journey through Spain, vol. ii. p. 330. 



4G THE INQUISITION. 

awaits his bereft family are all ideas which 
rush upon his mind ; he is at once agitated by 
an agony of dilemma and despair. The burn 
ing tear scarcely glistens on his livid cheek, the 
accents of woe die on his lips ; and, amidst the 
alarm and desolation of his family, and the con 
fusion and pity of his neighbours, he is borne 
away to dungeons, whose damp and bare walls 
can alone witness the anguish of his mind."* 

The inquisitorial prisons, though in more 
modern times, as Llorente informs us, com 
paratively light and airy, were, in earlier 
periods, dark, gloomy, and most distressing. 
The reader of the life of Howard the philan 
thropist knows the descriptions there given of 
prison accommodation, and can easily suppose 
that the Inquisition furnished no exception to 
the general rule. There were public cells for 
light offenders, more secluded ones for erring 
servants of the holy office, and secret ones for 
heretics. In the last case the seclusion was 
generally absolute. Here the miserable cap 
tive was immured, without society, without 
compassion, without books, without a copy of 
his accusation, and was often forbidden even 
to hum a tune, lest it might prove a means of 
correspondence with his fellow prisoners. Thus 
jealously cut off from all communication with 
the external world ; ignorant in the first in 
stance of the crime of which he was accused ; 
aware of the anxit-ty his unaccountable 

absence would cause to his friends, and of the 
Puigbltnch, chap. iv. 



APPARATUS AND PROCESSES. 47 

irretrievable ruin into \vhich his affairs would 
be thrown ; in dread of the torture, and appre 
hensive of the fatal issue which might lie be 
yond it it is no wonder if the prisoner was 
prostrated, body and soul, by the prolongation 
of such anguish ; or if those who had no spi 
ritual sustenance in gospel hope should rashly 
dare the dreadful act of suicide. " O my 
God I" said Constantine Ponce de la Fuente, a 
Spaniard and a most learned man, who, during 
the reign of the emperor Charles v., was im 
prisoned under suspicion of Lutheranism, 
" O my God ! were there no Scythians, or 
cannibals, or pagans, still more savage, that 
thou hast permitted me to fall into the hands 
of these baptized fiends?" His loathsome 
dungeon, which was never permitted to be 
cleaned in the least degree, brought on dysen 
tery, of which he died. Olmedo, a man dis 
tinguished for erudition and devotion, when 
immured in the prison of Seville, was often 
heard to say that, his condition was more 
dreadful than any kind of torture he could be 
called to endure. Juana Sanchez, imprisoned 
at Valladolid for heresy, committed suicide by 
means of a pair of scissors. In the Inquisition 
of Madrid, also, a physician murdered himself 
with a pair of snuffers. Many other instances 
are on record. 

The culprit, when a sufficient period had 
elapsed, was brought before the tribunal for 
examination. The most minute inquiries were 
made ; all of them, however, so cunningly 



48 THE INQUISITION. 

generalized ns to keep him in darkness. He 
was not informed of his charge, but, under 
oath, was enticed to make confession, or at 
least urged to admit a crime for which lie 
illicit suffer the last penalty. In the presence 
of the judges, who were clothed in their robes 
of office, and seated face to face before them, he 
was asked his parentage and descent whether 
any of his ancestors had been heretofore brought 
before the holy tribunal what was the amount 
of his property what the names of his relatives 

was required to give a precise account of his 

former history to state the reasons for which 
lie imagines himself to have been arrested to 
run over every act and incident of his whole 
life. To aid him in performing this scrutiny, 
the most persuasive and dulcet words were 
c-mployed by the presiding inquisitors ; or, 
failing in the result, other processes, abhorrent 
from the truthfulness of Christianity, but not 
to be despised when the ecclesiastical despotism 
of the papal church is involved, were used. 
Witness the following passage from the Direc 
tory of Eymeric : 

" When the prisoner lias been impeached 
the crime of heresy, but not convicted, and he 
obstinately persists in his denial, let the in 
quisitor take the proceedings into his hands 
or any other file of papers, and 
over in nee, let him fritrn t-> 

..vcro l the offence fully etoblitd tli 
find thaf " ll!<1 - lt 

^sion. The inquisitor shall then say 



AITAHATUS AND PROCESSES. 40 

to the prisoner, as if in astonishment, And is 
it possible that you should still deny what I 
have here before my own eyes? He shall 
then seem as if he read, and to the end that 
the prisoner may know no better, he shall fold 
down the leaf, and, after reading some moments 
longer, he shall say to him, l It is just as I have 
said; why, therefore, do you deny it, when you 
see I know the whole matter? When the 
inquisitor has an opportunity, he shall manage 
so as to introduce to the conversation of the 
prisoner some one of his accomplices, or any 
other converted heretic, who shall feign that he 
still persists in his heresy, telling him that he 
had abjured for the sole purpose of escaping 
punishment by deceiving the inquisitors. Having 
thus gained his confidence, he shall go into his 
cell some day after dinner, and keeping up the 
conversation till night, shall remain with him, 
under pretext of its being too late for him to 
return home. He shall then urge the prisoner 
to tell him all the particulars of his life, having 
first told him the whole of his own; and, in the 
mean time, spies shall be kept tit the door, as 
well as a notary, in order to certify what may 
be said within."* 

Or this : 

" Let the inquisitor have one of his accom 
plices, or any person now converted to the true 
faith, and who he knows is not offensive to the 
prisoner, and let him permit this person to 
enter and speak to the captive. If need be, let 
* Eyincric, Director. Inquis. chap. iii. p. 102. 



50 T1IE INQUISITION. 

him pretend that he is still of his sect, but has 
abjured through fear, and has deceived the 
inquisitors. And when the heretical prisoner 
shall have confided in him, let him go into his 
cell some day in the evening, and then feign 
that it is now too late to go away, and let him 
remain all night, that they may talk together 
and express the sympathy they have for each 
other, he who has just entered leading on the 
prisoner; and let it be arranged that spies shall 
stand outside the prison in some convenient 
place, who shall hear all and take down tho 
words ; and, if necessary, let there be a notary 
among them." 

" Ange ou demon ?" as the poet asked respect 
ing lord Byron. Are these "airs from heaven, 
or blasts from hell?" 

Though, under certain conditions, the ar 
raigned man was not wholly denied the aid of 
a defender, it was amidst circumstances which 
rendered it of little avail. The counsel was not 
permitted to examine the documents, nor to hold 
intercourse with the prisoner, except when the 
inquisitor was present. The defender was com 
pelled to promise that his defence should be 
limited by the justice of the case, and that he 
would throw up his brief if he believed his 
client to be guilty. The advocate was made to 
understand, in short, that the condemnation of 
the prisoner would be most acceptable to the 
holy office. 

Nor could the accused challenge his witnesses. 
He might, indeed, give in a catalogue of those 



APPARATUS AND PROCESSES. 51 

whom lie suspected of ill feeling, as well as of 
those who would probably bear testimony in 
his favour. By this means the Inquisition 
often caught hold of a new clue, out of which 
further proceedings might arise, affecting the 
prisoner himself or others. 

The prisoner s accusation was never given to 
him in writing, lest the study of the brief in 
prison might be the means of suggesting to 
him an artificial defence ; but his charge was 
read to him in presence of the inquisitor, and 
an immediate reply as to its truth or falsehood 
was demanded of him. 

Should the alleged offence be of a grave 
character, and all other means failed in ex 
tracting a confession, the next process was the 
torture. In case, however, of contradiction or 
faltering in his replies, the accused was at any 
time liable to be submitted to this process. 

In the Spanish tribunal the place of torture 
was an underground room, receiving no light 
of day. It was occupied by a table, at which 
were seated the inquisitor, inspector, and secre 
tary. In attendance on these was the execu 
tioner, dressed in a manner somewhat resembling 
the penitents still to be seen at Rome, but 
altogether in black. He was shrouded from 
head to foot, having his face entirely hidden, 
whilst two holes in his cowl enabled him to see 
clearly. When brought within sight of this 
official, and whilst the apparatus of torture was 
being prepared, the prisoner, who was supposed 
to be already terrified by the objects around 



52 THE INQUISITION. 

him, was exhorted by the inquisitor to confess 
the truth without reserve. It this failed, he was 
stripped a process which was accomplished 
with the utmost rapidity. The warning was 
then repented for the last time, the prisoner 
being taken aside in order the better to persuade 
him. All these efforts fulling, the torture 
began ; commencing usually with the lighter 
torments, and gradually proceeding to those of 
excruciating severity. During this process, 
various interrogations were put to the prisoner, 
not only regarding himself, but involving all 
who were suspected of being in complicity with 
him. Should the inquisitors fail to subdue 
him, the accused was shown other instruments 
of torture, with the threat that should lie con 
tinue obstinate he must submit to their whole 
severity. The answers returned were strictly 
written down by the notaries. 

In certain districts the questioning by torture 
wns not allowed to be applied to nobles. 

Among the processes resorted to in putting 
the question, the following may be enumerated. 
The prisoner, however, we may previously 
observe, was stripped, without regard to decency 
or sex, and invested in narrow linen drawers 
which left the arms bare. 

The first process was that of the pulley. 

I v tlii> tlu- prisoner was hooted to the roof ot 

hall, liis hands bound behind him and 

ntt.-H li. (1 t. the ropi- which eK-vnkd him; whil.-f 

a 1. v, Y 

fastened to his feet. Thj simple elevation 



APPARATUS AND PROCESSES. 53 

of a human body, six or seven feet from the 
ground, was dislocating; hut this torture could 
be severely increased. Sometimes, whilst in 
this position, stripes were applied to his back, 
and sometimes the rope being suddenly relaxed, 
the weight descended in an instant towards the 
ground, which, however, the body was not 
allowed to touch, and by this violent jerk the 
limbs were disjointed with the most excruciating 
agony. In the mean time the secretary was 
precise in recording the whole process the 
weights which were attached to the bod} , as 
welf as how often, and during what length of 
time the culprit was suspended. 

The next principal torture was that of the 
rack. The victim was extended upon a wooden 
frame, having transverse portions like a ladder, 
or sometimes only one cross-piece^upon^vhich 
his back might uneasily rest, with his feet 
usually higher than his head. Small cords 
were then affixed to the fleshy parts of his body, 
namely, to the upper and lower arm, and to 
the thigh and calf of the leg, which being 
tightened by the application of a bar, used 
after the manner of a tourniquet, buried them 
selves in the soft and yielding integuments, 
cutting to the bone. A still more terrible 
torture belonged to this " wooden horse," as it 
was sometimes called. A thin wetted ^cloth 
was thrown over the mouth and nostrils of 
the sufferer, through which he could scarcely 
breathe ; then a stream of water, sometimes 
amounting to seven pints, was poured down his 



54 THE INQUISITION. 

throat, producing the sensation of drowning or 
suffocation. (During this time the notary kept 
a minute of the whole process, down even to the 
quantity of water which was administered.) 
When this cloth, which had during this time 
penetrated considerably into the victim s body, 
was removed, it was usually covered with 
blood, and its withdrawal was a renewal of the 
agony of the previous process.* 

The third principal torture was that of the 
fire. The feet of the prisoner, already saturated 
with tallow or oil, were placed in a kind of 
stocks, and exposed to the heat of lighted 
charcoal a process of roasting alive. This 
torture was, however, mainly confined to Italy, 
and was especially adapted to persons who were 
deformed, and to whom other modes of torture 
were not so easily applicable.! When his agony 
had reached its crisis, a moment s intermission 
was given by the interposition of a board ; the 
prisoner was then exhorted to confess, but if 
he would not, or could not, the roasting went 
on. Heathenism might have exulted in so 
barbarous a cruelty. 

But though these were the principal tortures, 
the Inquisition could boast of many others. 
Sometimes a considerable amount of water was 
allowed to trickle, drop by drop, upon the 
culprit. Sometimes the body was enveloped in 
a linen garment, which was drawn as tight as 
possible, so as almost to squeeze the sufferer to 

* Llomito, chap. xvi. page 119. 
t PuigblancL, chap. iv. 



APPARATUS AND PROCESSES. 55 

death ; then, being suddenly relaxed, it produced 
by the change the severest anguish. Sometimes 
small cords were bound around the thumbs so 
tightly that the blood poured out from beneath 
the nails. Sometimes the body, placed against 
the wall and adequately supported, was tightly 
compressed by small cords affixed to the wall ; 
then, the bench beneath the sufferer being 
removed, the body was left to hang by these 
cords alone. The reader can best conceive the 
suffering. Sometimes a small ladder, the trans 
verse parts of which were made of sharpened 
wood, was placed against the shins of the victim, 
arid was then violently struck with a hammer. 
The torture of this infliction was incredible. 
Sometimes ropes were placed about the wrists 
of the accused, and were then drawn tight by 
being passed over the back of the torturer, who 
leaned forward with all his might till the flesh 
was severed. The last tortures were inflicted 
on Orobio, a Spanish Jew, who related the facts 
to Limborch.* 

One of the Italian tortures consisted of two 
cubes of iron, concave on one side, which were 
bound forcibly on the heel, then screwed into 
the flesh. Another, called the canes, was com 
posed of a hard piece of wood, placed between 
each finger; the hand was then bound and the 
fingers forced together. Nor need we omit an 
agonizing torture the placing of a foot some 
times a woman s foot in a heated slipper. 
But Llorente relates a torment, observed in 
* See Limborch s Inquisition. 



56 THE INQUISITION. 

Madrid, in the year 1820, which perhaps feur- 
passcs all. We give it in his own words: 

" The condemned is fastened in a groove, 
upon a table, on his back ; suspended above 
him is a pendulum, the edge of which is sharp, 
and it is so const ructcd as to become longer 
with every movement. The wretch sees this 
implement of destruction swinging to and fro 
above him, and every moment the keen edge 
approaching nearer and nearer; at length it 
cuts the skin of his nose, and gradually acts 
on until life is extinct." 

Does any perceptible vestige of the iv 
of love linger in such observances ? 

On the subject of the torture Llorente says: 

" I shall not describe the different modes of 
torture employed by the Inquisition, as it has 
been already done by many historians. 1 shall 
only say that none of them can be accused of 
exaggeration. I have read many proo 
which have struck and pierced me with horn-r, 
and I could regard the inquisitors who h.". ; l 
recourse to these methods in no other li.-ht 
than that of cold-blooded barbarians. Suiliee 
it to add, that the council of the " supreme" has 
often been obliged to forbid the repetition of 
the torture in the same process ; but the in 
quisitors, by an abominable sophism, have found 
means to n-nd r this prhil>itin aim- 
by giving the nan. I to that < 
sation from torture which is inq . -ii. >u>lv 

..ltd by the imminent danger to which the 
victim is exposed of dying in their hands. 



APPARATUS AND PROCESSES. 57 

My pen refuses to trace the picture of tliesc 
horrors, for I know nothing more opposed to 
the spirit of charity and compassion which 
Jesus Christ inculcates in the gospel than this 
conduct of the inquisitors ; and yet, in spite of 
the scandal which it has given, there is not, 
after the eighteenth century has closed, any 
la\v or decree abolishing the torture." 

The last observation is especially worthy of 
the notice of the reader, because it strongly 
applies to the defence which has been set up in 
modern times for the Inquisition by Roman 
Catholic advocates. It has been the policy of 
Romanists usually to deny that the cruelties 
of the past times were justly chargeable upon 
present. Yet, with an inconsistency which 
often belongs to error, they have been not 
infrequently tempted to justify and to extenuate 
practices which it had been well if they could 
have truly condemned. A writer in the Dublin 
Review, of 1848, in defending the Inquisition, 
contends that the tortures inflicted by the holy 
office were not greater than the " peine forte ct 
dnrc" and other punishments of the dark ages. 
To this the reply is obvious. First, that any man 
who should now dare to palliate the barbarity 
of such a mode of torture as that of the peine 
forte et durc, would brand himself with infamy. 
Secondly, this punishment, and others of a 
similar class, terrible as they were, became 
obsolete as the light of intelligence grew brighter 
and clearer; whereas abundant evidence exists, 
in the other case, that during even the present 



58 THE INQUISITION. 

century, the cruel ami deadly Inquisition has still 
continued its tortures. But when this adherence 
to barbarous and atrocious customs is practised 
under the shadow of the cross, and in the name 
of the Saviour, who does not recoil with undis 
guised abhorrence from a system which renders 
the slightest attempt at its defence desirable, or 
even endurable ? 

It not unfrequently happened, that the mea 
sures of the Inquisition to secure the capture 
of a prisoner transpired to the ears of their 
intended victim. Li case of escape, the culprit 
was cited to appear within a given time ; failing 
in which, he was pronounced excommunicate 
and a rebel. But even then, the church, not 
willing to suffer disappointment, lay continually 
in ambush for its victim, and, failing to reach 
him, proceeded with an impotent but merciless 
barbarity to attaint his memory and reputation. 
The confiscation of his effects, however, was a 
certain punishment, and was sufficiently real. 

The charge against a prisoner might fail in 
proof, and in that case we might have expected 
that it would have appeared to be the glory of 
a system which called itself religious to proclaim 
the innocence of the accused in the loudest 
terms. But the Inquisition had not so learned 
its lesson. It might not be able to p>-;>i>t in 
accusing, but it never exculpated. In c 
such as those just referred to, it ( 
itself with stating that the prisoner was released 
IVom the present charge. 

All these proceedings were intentionally 



APPARATUS AND PllOCESSES. 59 

veiled iii the most profound secresy. " I fet-1 
the pain," said Fra Louis de Leon, imprisoned 
by the Inquisition, "but I cannot see the hand, 
nor is there a place for me to hide or shelter 
me." 

Such were the processes employed by the 
Inquisition to detect offences. If a prisoner 
were found presumptively guilty, his case 
might resolve itself into one of three classes, 
to which corresponding degrees of punishment 
were attached. A light offence would expose 
him to a public abjuration, followed by pre 
scribed penances. A heavier crime would be 
succeeded either by perpetual imprisonment, or 
by the severe sentences of the merciless tribunal 
before which he had been arraigned. The auto 
da fe was usually the occasion on which sen 
tences were pronounced. 

A heretic was declared incapable of holding 
any inheritance whatever. In certain cases the 
Inquisition doled out a miserable allowance to 
the children of those whose property it had 
confiscated, but the claims of wives or widows 
were little regarded. Nor was the man who 
abjured his heresy considered as entitled to 
have his property restored to him. The crime 
of the father, if a heavy one, involved the infamy 
of his family. 

Perpetual imprisonment was inflicted in 
dungeons of every variety of severity, according 
to the supposed nature of the offence. 

It will be proper in this place to describe 
that grand, but terrible occasion, which, in 



60 TIIK INQUISITION. 

horrible imitation of the last judgment, con 
ducted the wretched criminal to his execution, 
and was called an auto da fd, (act of faith.) 
IV ben only one criminal was sentenced, the 
ceremony received the name of an autillo, but 
when many victims were associated, the utmost 
pains were taken to give publicity to the 
coming event, and to array it with imposing 
magnificence. Some Sunday, usually a great 
festival, was chosen for the demonstration, and 
public notice was given that at a certain time 
and place there would be presented a living 
picture of the last judgment. The magistrates 
also received notice that on that day the 
religious authorities would transfer the Inquisi 
tion s prisoners to their Lands. An indulgence 
of forty days was usually accorded to those who 
should witness the proceedings. On the day 
^preceding the auto, a bush was carried in 
solemn procession to the place of execution, and 
the oflicials of the Inquisition made proclama 
tion that, till the ceremonial was ended, no 
person should carry arms or drive any vehicle 
in the public streets. In the evening of that 
day the various religious communities of the 
city assembled at the holy ofiice, whence they 
walked to the place of the auto, chanting and 
bearing a covered bier. When they n-ached 
the scaffold they took from the bier a green 
cross, which they erected on an altar already 
provided for the purpose, placing around it 
large white tapers. This altar was 
during the night by Dominicans and 



APPARATUS AND PROCESSES. Gl 

Early on the morning of the day of the 
auto, the prisoners, whose heads had been 
alix-ady shaven and who had received their 
prescribed dresses, were brought together. 
None of them had known until the previous 
evening the precise nature of the punishment 
to which they had been sentenced. If the 
crime was considered one of the lowest degree, 
they were clothed for the procession in a 
pimple black garment. In case the charge 
exhibited against them was a heavy one, they 
were attired in loose woollen yellow garments 
called sambenitos, or " blessed frocks." This at 
tire, however, varied in its appendages according 
to the distinction made between the culprits. 

Those who abjured their heresies wore a 
plain scapulary of yellow stuff. 

Those who were strongly suspected wore the 
same garment with a demi-cross. 
Formal heretics bore a whole cross. 
In case of repentance before the execution of 
tho sentence, the dress was a yellow scapulary 
with a red cross and a cap formed in the shape 
of a cone, called a coroza. 

Where repentance came after the sentence, 
the scapulary bore a number of reversed 
flames surmounting a bust. In this case 
strangling was to precede burning. 

But when the charge was that of unrepentant 
heresy, the flames were represented upright, 
whilst figures of demons \vere portrayed on 
the sambenito and the coroza. 

The prisoners had placed before them a 



62 THE INQUISITION. 

sumptuous breakfast, which, as they ordinarily 
refused it, fell to the share of the menial ser 
vants. Before the condemned left the inquisi 
torial edifice, they were taken to a separate 
apartment, where for the last time they were 
exhorted to repent of their sius and to make 
their peace with the church. 

The order and ceremonial of the auto da f 
varied at different periods. One description 
may serve as a general model of the rest. Tfcc 
occasion to which we shall refer was the auto 
which took place in Madrid in 1680, in the 
presence of Charles 11. and his queen. 

At seven o clock in the morning, the great 
bell of the cathedral began to toll, and the 
procession moved forward. The way was 
cleared by soldiers of the holy tribunal. 
Next came surpliced priests, among whom 
the Dominican monks were honoured with 
precedence, and bore the banner of the 
Inquisition, which in Spain is a green cross 
on a black ground. A hundred and twenty 
prisoners followed, some in person and others 
in effigy borne on tall poles, the least guilty 
having the honour of precedence. Of these 
victims, forty- eight were men, seventy-two were 
women an appalling but significant distri 
bution. The effigies were sometimes accom 
panied by boxes containing the bones 
deceased heretics. Last in the procession of 
prisoners came twenty-one condemn..! t., 
the greater part of whom were gagged lest they 
should utter words which might be dangerous 



APPARATUS AND PROCESSES. 63 

to the ears of spectators. These victims, wear 
ing the coroza and sambcnito, were eacli 
attended by two friars, torturing the miserable 
sufferer to the last by useless and rejected over 
tures. The procession was wound up by the 
local magistracy, the officers of state, the chief 
bailiffs of the Madrid Inquisition, the familiars 
of the holy office on horses superbly attired, 
the ecclesiastical ministers, the fiscal proctor of 
the tribunal of Toledo, bearing the standard of 
the faith, etc., etc., and last of all the inquisitor- 
general, " seated on a superb bay horse, with 
purple saddle and housings, ornamented with 
ribbons and fringe of the same colour, and 
attended by twelve servants in livery. He was 
accompanied by an escort of fifty halberdiers, 
dressed in black satin with silver galloons and 
lace, white and black feathers in their hats, 
and commanded by the marquis de Pobar as 
protector of the Inquisition of Toledo, who 
making up for that rich shoAv and parade 
which was unfit for the situation of the inquisi 
tor-general, was mounted on a grey horse, 
wearing a saddle of massive silver, with white 
and green furniture conformable to his livery. 
He was clothed in a suit of black silk, embroi 
dered in silver, with diamond buttons, cockade, 
and insignia, and attended by eighteen livery 
servants." Olmo tells us that " this procession 
was performed in perfect silence." 

A stage had been erected in the large square 
of temporary materials, and in the following 
manner : At the back of the stage were three 



64 THE INQUISITION. 

rows of galleries, rising one above another, and 
covered with drapery, to protect from the 
weather. Immediately in front of the lower 
gallery was placed a throne for his majesty 
and the queen, having a large area in its front, 
and terminated on each side (that is, on the. 
right and left of the king) by platforms, formed 
of successively rising steps. These elevations 
were occupied on one side by the constituted 
authorities, surmounted by the inquisitor- 
general upon a throne ; and on the other by 
the prisoners, whose altitude was in proportion 
to the enormity of their offences. On the right 
front of the throne, and immediately below the 
gallery of the inquisitor, stood the altar. W 
have already spoken of an area in front of 
throne. In this level two compartments ap 
peared, having an open space between them. 
One of these compartments was occupied by 
the royal guard, the outer one by the families 
of the inquisitors, and in the intervening space 
stood the pulpit, two desks for the recorders 
who read the sentences, and a stage on which 
the prisoners successively stood to receive their 
doom. This theatre was richly decorated with 
hangings of crimson. 

Olmo relates, that " God moved the hearts of 
the workmen" on this occasion, " so as to over 
come thi- -n at difficulties which occurred in its 
, ; a. circumstance stroncly indicated 
11 master builders, with tlu*ir w<>rk- 
. tools, and materials, coming in, unso 
licited, to offer their services to the over^ur of 



APPARATUS AND PROCESSES. 65 

the works ; and all persevered with such fer 
vent zeal and constancy, that, without reserving 
to themselves the customary hours for rest, and 
taking only the necessary time for food, they 
returned to their labour with such joy. and 
delight, that, explaining the cause of their 
ardour, they exclaimed in the following man 
ner : Long live the faith of Jesus Christ ; all 
shall be ready at the time prescribed ; and it 
timber shall be wanting, we would gladly take 
our houses to pieces for a purpose so holy as 
this. "* 

When the royal party had taken their seats, 
the prisoners were paraded before them. An. 
oath was then administered to the king that 
lie would defend the Catholic faith, " which 
our holy mother the apostolic church of Rome 
holds and believes ; and that he would per 
secute, and command to be persecuted, all here 
tics and apostates opposed to the same ; that he 
would give, and command to be given, to the 
holy office of the Inquisition, and also to the 
ministers thereof, all aid and protection, in 
order that heretics, disturbers of our Christian, 
religion, might be seized and punished con 
formably to the laws and holy canons, without 
any omission on the part of his majesty," 
etc.f 

Mass was then said, and the oath was ad 
ministered to the mayor of Madrid and to the 
people present ; after which a sermon was 
preached by a Dominican qualifier. 

* Olmo, pp. 33, 34. f Ibid, p, 169. 
C 



66 THE INQUISITION. 

The sermon on this occasion was founded on 
the motto of the Inquisition " Arise, O Lord, 
judge thine own cause." It contained the fol 
lowing passages : 

" And thou, O most holy tribunal of the 
faith, fbr boundless nges mayest thou be so 
preserved as to keep us firm and pure in the 
faith, and to promote the punishment of the 
enemies of God. Of thce can I say what the 
Holy Spirit said of the church, Thou art all 
fair, my love, as the tents of Kedar, " etc. We 
could fain spare the reader the recital of this 
outrageous blasphemy, but it is part of a system, 
and we ought not to spare its details. 

" But what parallels, similes, or comparisons 
are these ? What praise or what heightened 
contrast can that be which compares a delicate 
female, an unequalled beauty, to the tents of 
Kedar and the spotted skins of Solomon ? St. 
Jerome discovered the mystery, and says, that 
the people of Kedar being fond of the chase, 
therein took great delight ; and for this pur 
pose had always their tents pitched in the field ; 
on which, in order to prove the valour of their 
arms, they spread the skins of the animals 
killed in the chase, and hung up the heads of 
the wild beasts they had slain. And the said 
people of Kedar were so proud and boastful of 
these their trophies, that they prized them as 
th .-ir greatest ornaments : this was the greatest 
; y of tlifir t-.-nts ; to this the Holy Spirit 
compares the beauty of the church ; and this is 
also to-day the glory of the holy tribunal of 



APPARATUS AND PROCESSES. G7 

the faith of Toledo. To have killed these 
horrid wild beasts and enemies of God whom 
we now behold on this theatre, some by taking 
life from their errors, reconciling them to our 
holy faith, and inspiring them with contrition 
for their faults ; others by condemning them, 
through their obduracy, to the flames, [here 
the orator openly, and without any disguise, 
confesses that the Inquisition condemns to the 
i lames,] where, losing their corporeal lives, 
their obstinate souls will immediately go to 
burn in hell ; by this means God will be 
avenged of his greatest enemies ; dread will 
follow these examples ; the holy tribunal will 
remain triumphant, and we ourselves more 
strongly confirmed and rooted in the faith, 
which, accompanied by grace and good works, 
will be the surest pledge of glory."* 

The sermon being ended, the trials and sen 
tences were read, which occupied the multitude 
till four in the afternoon. Those who were 
condemned to die were, if ecclesiastics, stripped 
of their robes with great solemnity. The vic 
tims were then delivered over to the magis 
trates, with the hypocritical request as to each 
one, " that they would treat him with much 
commiseration, and not break a bone of his 
body, or shed his blood." f But as the judge 

* The above extracts from Olmo are taken from the au- 
tlventic work of don Antonio Puigblanch, who was himself 
a .Spaniard, thoroughly versed in the history of the Inqui 
sition, and possessing every qualification for unmasking that 
sanguinary tribunal. London, 1816. 

t Montanus, p. 148. 



68 THE INQUISITION. 

had been already made acquainted with the 
number of prisoners to be delivered over to 
hi ID, every preparation had been made for this 
consummation. The place of execution was an 
area suitably fitted up for the occasion, being 
a stone platform of sixty feet square, and seven 
feet in height. Some of those who were con 
demned to be burned, anticipating the orders 
of the executioners, cast themselves into the 
lire. The rest were soon made to follow. The 
bodies of those on whom the sentence of stran 
gulation before death had been carried out, 
were then thrown into the flames, together with 
the effigies or bones of such as had not fallen 
into the hands of their merciless tormentors. 

The slightest attention to the preceding forms 
of trial will convince the reader how contempti 
bly unjust and unblushingly mendacious was 
the whole procedure. To say nothing of the as 
sumed and anti-scriptural authority under which 
the church of Rome inflicted such mortal penal 
ties, and to suppress altogether our indignation 
that the cloak of religion should cover deeds so 
enormous, there was not a process of the trial 
and execution which did not exhibit the foulest 
partiality and injustice. The evident desire of 
the tribunal to accuse and to convict; the awful 
my&tery which continually shrouded the pri 
soner ; the advantage taken of those symptoms 
of hesitation or weakness which, amidst scenes 
of physical torture, will often beset the innocent ; 
the paralysing influence of long-continued men 
tal suffering upon the mind of the incarcerated 



APPARATUS AND PROCESSES. C9 

victim; and especially the hopelessness of 
any fair decision in cases where the sufferer, 
having learned nobler truths, had excited the 
anger or the fears of his judges formed alto 
gether a combination which demonstrates that 
the ecclesiastical tyranny of a false church 
is the most debasing, most despotic, and most 
tremendous engine which can try the faith and 
patience of God s true servants. The declara 
tion of the church of Rome that her hands are 
bloodless, is proved by every page of the annals 
of the Inquisition to be a lie. " Is there in all 
history," says Dr. Geddes, " an instance of so 
gross and confident a mockery of God and the 
world as this of the Inquisition ? beseeching the 
civil magistrates not to put to death the heretics 
they had condemned and delivered to them ! " 
" Can anything be more evident," says Dr. 
Chandler, u than that this is nothing more than 
acting a part and an affectation to be thought 
by the people to have no hand in the murder of 
which they are really the authors ?" We may 
remark, that the execution of the inquisitorial 
sentence by the magistrates was, to a consider 
able extent, compulsory ; as to have refused it 
would have been to incur the doom of excom 
munication no trivial penalty in the days of 
mediaeval ignorance and papal barbarity. 



70 THE INQUISITION. 



(CHAPTER III. 

THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 

A MEMORABLE feature in the history of the In 
quisition is its introduction into Spain in the 
year 1232. Up to this time, the edicts against 
heresy in that country had been remarkably 
lenient. The council of Elvira had denied the 
privilege of the communion to any Catholic 
who should become an informer. The severest 
law against heretical doctrine amounted to de 
privation and perpetual banishment. Even 
when Alphonso 11. banished the Vaudoia from 
his kingdom, those who remained were expressly 
exempted from death or mutilation. At the 
period above referred to, however, Peter Cade- 
rite, a predicant monk, was commissioned to 
set up the Inquisition at Aragon, and was placed 
under the special protection of the king, whi!-t 
the primate was ordered to constitute inquisitors 
in his district. Four years later, a papal bri.-f 
introduced this engine of intolerance into Castile, 
where it was eagerly welcomed by 1-Vr.linand, 
(miscalled the saint,) who, at an execution of 
heretics, himself carried the wood by which 



TIIE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 71 

they were to be destroyed. Such was the 
opposition, however, raised by the Castilians to 
the original institution, that during some period 
of time little progress was made in the estab 
lishment of a regular tribunal. 

The modern Spanish Inquisition dates its 
origin from the union of the mass of the Spanish 
kingdoms under Ferdinand and Isabella, whilst 
the subsequent conquest of Granada afforded a 
tempting opportunity for the exercise of the 
powers of the holy office. At that time Spain 
presented throughout all its borders an exten 
sive and formidable amount of rebellion against 
the doctrines and practices of the papal see. 
The conscience of Isabella was held in the most 
absolute bondage by Ximenes, an able politi 
cian, who, from the post of confessor, subse 
quently advanced to that of prime minister. 
Originally a mendicant monk of the Franciscan 
order, he practised a self-denying abstinence in 
singular contrast to the luxuries by which he 
was surrounded ; and though he had begun by 
attempting, contrary to the advice of Adrian vi., 
the reigning pope, to reform the church, he 
ended by vigorous efforts to extirpate heresy 
from its borders. He was seconded in his 
designs by the bigotry of Isabella and the 
covetousness of her husband ; and as many 
Jews abounded in Spain, and escaped the ter 
rors of death by a false profession of Chris 
tianity, the Dominican friars took advantage of 
the unpopularity which these merchants had 
acquired by their wealth and usury, to stir up 



72 THE INQUISITION. 

the reigning sovereigns to an entire remodelling 
of the ancient Inquisition. 

The leading agent of this newly constituted 
tribunal was lather Thomas Torqucmadn, who 
was constituted inquisitor-general. 

Under him inferior tribunals were appointed, 
the heads of which, with himself and some 
others, formed a junta, by whom instruct ions 
were drawn up for the regulation of the future 
proceedings of the holy office. Among tho 
articles which were then published, and which 
Llorente has recorded at length, some are worthy 
of special notice. 

The second i\nd third articles commanded 
censures to be pronounced against those who 
did not voluntarily accuse themselves during 
thirty days. 

The sixth That a reconciled heretic (one 
who had confessed his heresy, and }>een 
absolved) should perform penance by being 
deprived of all honourable employments, and 
of the use of gold, silver, pearls, silk, and fine 
wool. 

The eighth That one confessing after the 
term of grace should suffer confiscation. 

The eleventh and twelfth That if, during 
imprisonment, a prisoner appeared to show true 
repentance, he .should suffer perpetual impri 
sonment ; but that if the inqui-sitnrs thought 
his repentance simulated, they should condemn 
n im to be burned. 

1 he- fifteenth That torture might be inflict^! 
upon semi-proof of the crime ; if the 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 73 

confessed his crime during torture, and adhered 
to that acknowledgment^ he was punished as it 
convicted ; but if he retracted, he was tortured 
again, or sentenced to extraordinary punishment. 

The sixteenth That the accused should not 
be made acquainted with the whole deposition 
of the witnesses. 

The nineteenth That if an accused man did 
not appear when summoned, he was condemned 
as a heretic. 

The twentieth That if after deatli a man be 
proved to be a heretic, sentence should be 
passed on him, his body disinterred, and burned, 
and his property confiscated. 

The twenty-second That the children of a 
condemned heretic, if under age at their father s 
death, should receive a portion of their father s 
goods as alms, and that the inquisitors should 
provide for their education. 

The last That any point not comprehended 
in these articles should be left to the prudence 
of the inquisitors.* 

With this code in his hand, Torquemada 
introduced the inquisitorial system into the, 
kingdom of Aragon, appointing Gaspard Juglar, 
a Dominican, and Arbues, inquisitors. But 
there was another element of the question which 
had been altogether forgotten, or at best imper 
fectly considered we mean the popular feeling. 
The most violent opposition to the new tribunal 
was manifested by the Aragonese themselves. 
Many who held high offices about the court 

* Llorcnte, chap. vi. 



74 THE INQUISITION. 

were terrified and indignant at its tyrannical 
proceedings. They sent a deputation to the 
pope and to the king, pleading that the consti 
tution of the kingdom of Aragon forbade the 
new confiscations. But they pleaded in vain ; 
for whilst these commissioners were waiting iii 
the pope s and king s anti-chamber, several of 
the insurgents at home were seized and con 
demned. It was then determined by the Ara- 
gonese that the new inquisitors should be as 
sassinated, and they fixed upon Arbues as their 
victim. Though he wore constantly a secret 
coat of mail, and an iron covering for his head, 
which his cap concealed, he was wounded in the 
back of his neck whilst performing service in 
church, and died two days after from the 
injury. He was afterwards beatified by Alex 
ander vir., and Ferdinand and Isabella honoured 
him with a sumptuous mausoleum. 

This murder was the commencement of a 
new proscription, directed against those sus 
pected of having a share in that crime. The 
conspiracy by which Arbues death had been 
projected was revealed by one of the assassins 
of the inquisitor. Llorente tells us that in con 
sequence " there was scarcely a single family 
in the three first orders of nobility which was 
not disgraced by having at least one of its mem 
bers in the auto da f<, wearing the habit of a 
talk" The murderers were seized, their 
bodies quark-ivd, while tin ir limbs decor 
the highways. Aragon, howcv.-r, had not alone 
resisted the newly modelled Inquisition. Great 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 75 

opposition was made to it in other quarters, 
especially in Majorca and Sardinia.* In fact, 
the infamy of the Inquisition in Spain, as else 
where, rests upon the exertions made by the 
Dominican monks for its establishment. 

Before the siege of Granada was yet finished, 
and at the time when the treaty with Columbus 
for the discovery of America was still recent, 
Ferdinand and Isabella published their cruel 
edict against the Jews, who had acquired in 
Spain a distinction denied to them by the other 
courts of Europe, and had obtained large pos 
sessions and considerable influence. These 
Jews were charged, through the instigation of 
the inquisitorial clergy, with promoting apostasy 
from the Christian faith, and with crucifying 
children on Good Friday ; whilst the death of 
many Christians, some of whom were nobles, 
and even kings, was attributed to the designing 
practices of Jewish physicians. The true cause 
of odium may perhaps be found in the fact of 
the superior riches possessed by the Jews ; f 
and the marriages which took place between 
them and the Christians, who thus obtained 
fortune in exchange for rank, prompted the 
envious or malicious to every calumny. These 
rumours were eagerly seized on and extended 
by the inquisitors, who declared that, till the 
unbaptized Jews were banished from Spain, the 

* Llorente, chap. vi. Aragon was not the only protesting 
kingdom. Valentia and Saragossa both resisted the establish 
ment of this tribunal. See Fuigblanch, chap. iii. 

Martyr; quoted in Prescott s " Ferdinand and Isabella, 



vol. ii. p. 221." 



76 THE INQUISITION. 

Christian religion was in danger. Terrified by 
the imminence of their peril, the Jews offered a 
large subsidy, (thirty thousand pieces of silver,)* 
ns if to cany on the war against the Moors ; 
they promised at the same time all obedience as 
citizens, declared their willingness to retire, as 
the regulations required, to their habitations 
before night-fall, and to avoid all iriterferencp 
with the Christians. These propositions were 
conveyed to Ferdinand and Isabella by Ahar- 
6anel, once a farmer of the royal revenue, who, 
having been allowed to reach the royal pre 
sence in the Alhambra, kneeling at the royal 
feet, besought the sovereigns to recal the sen 
tence which they had just pronounced, namely, 
that after the next 31st of July, every person 
harbouring a Je\v should incur the forfeiture of 
all his property, and be deprived of any office 
he might hold ; and that, during the interval, 
any Jew might sell his estates, subject to the 
condition that they were riot to remove gold, 
silver, money, or other prohibited articles. The 
rntreaty was abject, the temptation great, whm 
Torquemada burst into the apartment, and 
drawing forth a crucifix, held it up as h- cri.-.l 
out, " Judas sold his Master for thirty pieces of 
silver; your highnesses would sell him anew 
for thirty thousand: behold him! take him 
and sell him with all the haste you can ! II.- 
threw the crucifix on the table, and 1- ft il..< 
apartment. Abashed and confounded, tlu> 

tf. cl.ap. viii. The sum is variously ttte<! in iM 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 77 

royal couple retraced their steps. Torquemada 
Lad gained the victory, and the edict was signed 
March 20th, 1492. 

Nothing could exceed the consternation of 
the Jews on the issuing of this proclamation. 
The time was too short, the state of the market 
(now presenting advantageous offers on every 
hand) too unfavourable to allow of any fair 
measure of compensation for the property they 
were compelled to sacrifice. " A house was 
exchanged for an ass ; a vineyard for a small 
quantity of cloth or linen." But in vain did 
Torquemada urge them to receive baptism. A 
few only listened to his exhortations. The 
rest, to the number of eight hundred thousand, 
quitted Spain ; some of them, in evasion of the 
edict, carrying their money concealed in their 
saddles, or in their garments, whilst not a few 
of them swallowed their gold. 

AYhen the day named in the edict arrived, 
all the principal roads witnessed a melancholy 
spectacle in the crowds of sad and desolate 
exiles by which they were thronged. Men, 
women, children, on horses, or asses, or carts, 
thronged the highways, attended by a great 
multitude who performed the journey on foot. 
Few knew the direction which they ought to 
take. Their misery was aggravated, not re 
lieved, by the songs and music with which 
their rabbis exhorted them to triumph over 
the calamities of the occasion. Vessels had 
been partially provided at the principal ports ; 
but the insufficient means of transport mocked 



78 THE INQUISITION. 

their hopes. They were assailed on their road 
by multitudes of plunderers and debauchees, 
who, in some cases, even tore open their bodies 
in search of gold. Of those who reached their 
provided vessels many were sold into slavery 
and many thrown into the sea. Pestilence 
invaded some of the overcrowded vessels ; 
shipwreck and famine did their work on many 
more. Some, who managed to reach Ercilla, a 
Christian settlement in Africa, proceeded to 
Fez, to be plundered by robbers, and then re 
turned to Ercilla, where their calamities in 
duced them to accept an unwelcome baptism. 
Others, journeying towards Italy, took refuge 
m Naples, bringing with them a pestilential 
disorder, which spread among the inhabitants, 
and carried off twenty thousand in one year 
Others again, with better success, made their 
way into Portugal, through which they were 
allowed a passage at the rate of a cmzade a 
head ; while they were allowed, if they settled 
to ply their skill as artizans in that kingdom. 
JV> one," says Senarega, "could behold the 
ffenngs of the Jewish exiles unmoved. A 
great many perished of hunger, especially those 
tender years. Mothers, with scarcely strength 
to support themselves, carried their famished 
infants in their arms and died with thrm. 
-Many fell victims to the cold, others to inN 
thirst, while the unaccustomed distresses inci 
ted th.-ir maladirs. 

rwflj m-t enlarge on the cruelty and the ava 
rice which they frequently experienced from 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 79 

the masters of the ships which transported 
them from Spain. Some were murdered to 
gratify their cupidity ; others forced to sell 
their children for the expenses of the passage. 
They arrived at Genoa in crowds, but were not 
suffered to tarry there long, by reason of the 
ancient law, which interdicted the Jewish tra 
veller from a longer residence than three days. 
They were allowed, however, to refit their ves 
sels, and to recruit themselves for some days 
from the fatigues of; their voyage. One might 
have taken them for spectres, so emaciated 
were they, so cadaverous in their aspect, and 
with eyes so sunken ; they differed in nothing 
from the dead except in the power of motion, 
which indeed they scarcely retained. Many 
fainted and expired on the mole, which, being 
completely surrounded by the sea, was the only 
quarter vouchsafed to the wretched emigrants. 
The infection bred by such a swarm of dead 
and dying persons was not at once perceived, 
but when the winter broke up ulcers began to 
make their appearance, and the malady, which 
lurked for a long time in the city, broke out 
into the plague the following year."* 

One hundred and sixty thousand Jews, ac 
cording to the most moderate estimate, were 
expelled from Spain during the reigns of Ferdi 
nand and Isabella. Llorente and many others 
state the number as eight hundred thousand. 
The former estimate appears best to comport 
with the calculations of the Jewish rabbis 

* Prescott s Ferdinand and Isabella, vol. ii. pp. 251, 252. 



80 THE INQUISITION. 

themselves. In one year five thousand Jews 
suffered death ; and a million in the course of 
a few years submitted to the forms of Cluis- 
tianity.* 

Such "barbarity, which, with all our esti- 
Jiiate of the moral guilt of the Jews in obsti 
nately rejecting the true Messiah, fills the com 
passionate mind with horror, has been almost 
uniformly represented by Spanish writers as a 
sublime act of religious heroism. Mirandola, 
the Florentine, describes it as a scene in which, 
" while it fills Christians with consternation," 
"the glory of the Divine justice delighted." 
And Senarega sneaks of it as a transaction 
" which, though it might contain some small 
degree of cruelty, had respect to the honour of 
our religion." 

This was almost the last act of Torquemada, 
a man who, as the chief of the Inquisition, 
aimed at unbounded influence, and exercised 
his power with savage fanaticism. Whether 
from ambition or from fear, (but probably from 
both motives,) he affected a pomp almost regal. 
In his journeys he was attended by fifty mounted 
familiars, whilst two hundred more accompanied 
him on foot. Whatever his propositions in the 
inquisitorial council might be, they were always 
received by the phrase " We conform, though 
they might afterwards become the Mihj-ct of 
remonstrance. The grandees of the C 
alike bowed bi-f>n- him. Jt is a Mibji-ct of con 
cern to the historian that <|iu--n I>ali-lla, w] 
* McCrie s Reformation in Spain, rhsp. n. 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 81 

talents and virtues were in many respects so 
conspicuous, should have yielded herself to the 
influence of a bigoted asceticism, which made 
her the tool of so sanguinary a confessor. 

The conquest of Granada, in 1492, called 
the Inquisition into renewed activity. At the 
instigation of don Diego Dieza, successor of 
Torquemada, the inquisitors used their utmost 
influence with Ferdinand and Isabella to banish 
those Moors, or Moriscoes, as they were then 
called, who refused to undergo baptism as a 
sign of their conversion to the Christian faith. 
But these sovereigns, hoping that the Moors 
would eventually conform to the religion of 
Kome, gave orders that they should be treated 
with leniency, and at first forbade all perse 
cution. Accordingly, in 1499, Ximenes, in a 
conference with the Moorish literati, promised 
them that if they would embrace Christianity 
and instruct their people in its principles, they 
should receive honours and offices. The appeal 
proved irresistible, and three thousand of them 
received baptism, whilst one of their principal 
mosques became consecrated as a collegiate 
church. Though the number of converts was 
very numerous, the progress was not, however, so 
rapid as the proselyting zeal of Ximenes desired. 
Accordingly, terror was employed to add its 
impulse to the other motives which were swelling 
the amount of Moorish conversions. Ximenes 
not only burned in one great pile all the Arabic 
manuscripts he could collect together an im 
mense loss to literature but, by the severe 



THE INQUISITION. 

measures which he employed, drove the Moors 
into the madness of despair. A contention 
arising between the servants of the cardinal and 
these irritated orientals, led to an insurrection, 
in which the palace of Ximenes was besieged, 
whilst the prelate himself had nearly rec i 
the martyrdom to which he aspired. The 
interposition of the archbishop of Granada, 
whose meekness soothed the populace, saved 
Ximenes from destruction, and he hastened to 
court to instigate the mind of his sovereigns 
against the Moors. Ills task was somewhat 
difficult, but his influence was great. In such 
a court, and especially in the breast of Isabella, 
the efforts of such a man were well nigh om 
nipotent. The Moors were aliens, infidels, 
belonging to a nation long renowned for op 
posing the zeal of Rome. Multitudes of them 
were, accordingly, imprisoned ; some embraced 
Christianity, and some hastily sold their pro 
perty in the best market they could find, and 
departed for Barbary. A movement in i .i , 
of the Moors was made in the mountainous 
districts of Alpuxarra, but this insurrection 
was sternly subdued, together with others 
which arose at the same time from similar 
causes. The last spark of the sedition was 
ultimately trodden out. A decree, similar to 
that which had expelled the Jews, was issued 
Ml the iinK-ipti/cd Moors, and intnlrrance 
triumphed orer th> last vestiges of their liberty. 
I In- conditions of the conquest of Granada, 
which provided that no Moor should become a 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 83 

Christian against his will, (though it had been 
confirmed by the royal word,) were shamelessly 
violated ; and, pressed by the Inquisition, the 
king forbade the use of the Moorish tongue, 
commanded Moorish houses to remain open, 
forbade Moriscoes the use of baths, and denied 
them marriage according to their own customs. 
In the mean time the energies of the Inquisition 
were vigorously employed. A watch was kept 
over the slightest actions of the Moors, and their 
proceedings were duly reported to the holy 
office. The following circumstance is related 
by Llorente: On December the 8th, 1528, an 
infamous woman, named Catalina, forwarded 
an accusation to the court of Valladolid against 
Juan, a Monaco of the age of seventy-one. She 
related that she had lived with him eighteen 
years before, and she bore witness that, ac 
cording to the custom of the Moors, he and his 
family had neither eaten pork nor drunk wine, 
and that they washed their feet on Saturday 
nights and Sunday mornings. Juan was brought 
before the Inquisition and examined. His defence 
was, that at the age of forty-five he had received 
baptism; that his previous habits had rendered 
wine and pork distasteful ; and that he being a 
coppersmith by trade, he and his children had 
found the frequent use of water necessary to 
cleanliness. He was sent back to his own town, 
and was forbidden to travel more than three 
leagues beyond it. T\vo years after, in order to 
obtain from him information which might crimi 
nate others, the Inquisition again summoned him. 



84 THE INQUISITION. 

He was taken to the chamber of torture, was 
stripped, and bound to the ladder ; he then told 
die inquisitors, that though they might distract 
him by torture, his utterances would not be 
worthy of credit, and that he was determined 
not to make a false confession. As threats 
would not move him, he was released from the 
torture, but was kept strictly confined till the 
next auto da fo, at which time he was walked 
as a penitent, with a lighted candle in his hand, 
and saw several persons burned, but was himself 
ultimately released.* 

The existence and proceedings of the Inqui 
sition in Spain will ever brand indelibly the 
memory of cardinal Ximenes de Cisneros. 
Placed at the helm of power at a period when 
his strong natural sagacity could fully estimate 
the evils of intolerance, he maintained the 
system of the holy office amidst its worst abuses, 
extended it to Africa and America, defeated all 
attempts to reform the vices of the tribunal, 
(especially the system of secret depositions,) 
and exposed himself to the charge, that when 
he himself held the office of inquisitor-general, 
in a period of eleven years, fifty-two thousand 
eight hundred and fifty-five persons were con 
demned under his instigation and permission. 
Of this number, no fewer than three thousand 
five hundred and sixty-four were burned 
alive !f 

But if anything can demonstrate more forcibly 

* I.lorontc, clmp. \ii. 
t Ibid. clmp. .\. 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 85 

than another the degrading influence of so 
detestable a system, it is the fact that the 
Inquisition, strongly protested against on its 
first introduction by the Spanish people, as the 
source of interminable misery, and the horrible 
scourge of a heroic nation, should have become 
in the issue a subject of pride to the Spaniards 
themselves, whilst its name was regarded as 
conferring honour on the spot of its birth. " The 
claims of the inhabitants of Seville are engraven 
on a monument, erected in their city, to the 
memory of this event. Segovia .has contested 
this honour with Seville, and its historians are 
seriously divided on the question, whether the 
holy office held its first sitting in the house of 
the marquis de Moga, or in that of the major 
at Caceres."* 

The cruelty of the Inquisition could only be 
equalled by its credulity. A cunning woman 
of Pedraita, who professed to have received 
visions of Jesus,- (like the protegee of the late 
earl of Shrewsbury,) was, during the adminis 
tration of Ximenes, an object of especial favour. 
She was introduced at court, excited the atten 
tion of the population of Spain, and was petted 
and patronised by the Inquisition. Rome fa 
vours all absurdities provided they be its own. 

On his accession to the throne of Spain, 
Charles i., grandson of Ferdinand and Isabella, 
(better known to us by his German title of 

* McCrie s Reformation in Spain, p. 107. In the provinces of 
Andalusia, in about forty years, thirty thousand persons 
informed against themselves. Puigblanch, chap. iv. 



86 THE INQUISITION. 

Charles v.,) bad appeared inclined to oppose, 
or at least greatly to restrict inquisitorial opera 
tions in that kingdom. But the disposition, if it 
were ever sincere, lasted for a very brief space ; 
and Leo x., after negotiations in which his 
venality was strongly conspicuous, persuaded 
the sovereign to attempt no interference with 
the powers of the holy see. 

Yet, amidst all these debates, the activity of 
the holy office continued undiminished. Among 
the other victims of the Spanish tribunal at 
this time was Juan de Salas, a physician,* who 
was accused of having, in the vehemence of a 
dispute, uttered a profane expression. The 
charge would have been a serious one, if true ; 
though it was not by means like these that the 
guilty man could have been most effectively 
convinced of its enormity. But he strongly 
denied it. He was laid in the trough we i 
already described, bound tightly with cords, 
each of which surrounded his extremities eh \ . n 
times. In this position he was urged to con 
fess. But instead of confessing he denied th.- 
charge, uttering aloud such formula? as ini^hl 
have tended to convince his judges that hia 
adherence to Komanism was still un.^liuk. n. 
The torture of the cloth and th.- drij.piru- \\at.-r 
was then applied, but only with the &um .- ivMilt 
as before. The iin|iiUii..r.s nr.\t ti^htrn.d hi.s 
curds so as to cut the Iksh to the bone, and 

Tl.p l.-ariiin ? nn.l tnl.-i.t nf t..- Spamanls at fhr tun.- Wtn 
n.iv 



r un.- tn 
s.rn.^iv ,,a,,,M KO,,,H.,,M,,. The proverb remaini t-, thi* 

ran " " * ^"^ as tu be lu d8W of b t 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 87 

then renewed the application of the water. 
Still the prisoner denied. Baffled by his firm 
ness, which was doubtless the result of a con 
sciousness of truth, the inquisitor said that his 
tortures must be regarded as having only com 
menced. The accused was then set at liberty, 
to remain subject to the constant dread of the 
resumption of his torment. 

In the year 1535, after many tumults and 
disputes, Charles withdrew his protection during 
ten years from the tribunal. It was, however, 
a nominal, not a real, suspension of his favour. 

A danger of a more alarming character than 
either Jewish or Moorish heresy was now, how 
ever, about to summon into play the destructive 
energies of the Inquisition. The Information, 
which had extended the blessings of religious 
freedom to so many countries in Europe, had 
partially visited even Spain. The abuses of the 
church in that kingdom had attracted attention, 
and the word of God, together with some of the 
writings of the reformers, had begun to be cir 
culated. Gonzalo de Illescos, a Spanish writer 
quoted by De Castro, has even affirmed that to 
such an extent had, what he terms heresy, 
spread in Spain, that if two or three months had 
elapsed before a remedy had been applied, the 
conflagration would have spread itself all over 
the kingdom, and brought upon it the most dire 
calamities. But the Inquisition was true to her 
mission of evil. The word of God was almost 
entirely suppressed by it; many Lutherans 
were obliged to seek shelter on more tolerant 



THE INQUISITION. 

shores ; while on those who fell within its 
grasp, the holy office poured out all the vials of 
its wrath ; striving, and but too effectually, to 
extirpate, by the rack and the stake, the pro 
gress of Divine truth in the land. In this 
work the Inquisition was cordially aided by the 
reigning monarch, Philip 11. The emperor, 
Charles v., wearied with the cares of a king 
dom, had retired to his pleasant retreat at 
Yuste, but his bigoted spirit also was sorely 
disturbed by the intelligence of the danger 
which seemed to threaten the church. He 
wrote to Philip, then in Flanders, urging the 
most severe measures, and added to his secre 
tary s letter a postscript in his own hand 
writing, expressing how deeply he was shocked 
at the rise of heresy, and how needful it was to 
cut out the root of the evil by " rigour and rude 
handling." The inquisitor-general was promptly 
communicated with, and suggested, in reply, 
various new measures, adapted, as he considered, 
to arrest the growing evil. The province of " the 
Holy Office was extended, the press was rigo 
rously fettered, and all new works subjected to 
the Inquisition s censorship." As a proof of the 
strictness exercised, it may be mentioned, that 
even Dr. Matthioso, the confidential physician 
of the emperor Charles v., having in his pos 
session a small Bible in French, without notes, 
was obliged to ask the secretary of state to pro 
cure for him a license from the Inquisition, JMT- 
niitting him to retain it. As some demur, 
however, was made to granting this request, the 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 89 

doctor soon afterwards judged it prudent to 
burn the forbidden book in the presence of the 
emperor s confessor. Well does an eloquent 
writer,* when commenting upon these efforts of 
the Romish church to fetter the human mind, 
exclaim, " There were ages in which the church, 
as the sanctuary of art, and knowledge, and 
letters, deserved the gratitude of the world ; but 
for the last three centuries she has striven to 
cancel the debt in the noble offspring of genius 
which she has strangled in the birth, and in the 
vast fields of intellect which her dark shadow 
has blighted." 

The effects of the awakened energies of the 
Inquisition were soon visible. About the year 
1540. Rodrigo cle Valero began to preach Pro 
testantism in Seville. He had been a gay, as 
well as rich young man, but he had been taught 
(by God s Spirit, as we would fain trust, in 
spite of many defects in his character) the 
value of the Scriptures, and the importance of 
personal religion. His strong conviction of the 
errors of Romanism led him into constant dis 
putes with his ecclesiastical neighbours. Fear 
less of results, Rodrigo defended his positions 
on all occasions, and in the most public places 
of resort. lie was soon called before the in 
quisitors, lie here displayed the same courage 
as before, pointing out the marks of a true 
church, and upholding the doctrine of justifica 
tion by faith in Christ. The inquisitors seem 
to have regarded him as partially insane, and 
* Stirling s Cloister Life of Cnarles v. 



90 TIIE INQUISITION. 

set him at liberty, contenting themselves with 
confiscating his whole property. But as 
Rodrigo pursued the same course as before, he 
was brought, after a few years, once more to the 
same tribunal. Again the conviction of his 
madness saved him from the flames. The in 
quisitors compelled him to recant, standing up 
in a church in Seville. He was afterwards 
condemned to wear the sambenito, and to per 
petual imprisonment. Yet he not unfrequently 
interrupted the preacher at the church to which 
he was weekly carried, by contradicting the 
doctrines he preached. His reputed insanity 
saved him from more serious consequences, and 
he died in a monastery at San Lucar. His 
sambenito was long preserved in the cathedral 
church of Seville, accompanied by the inscrip 
tion which declared him a pseudo-apostle and 
Lutheran.* This incident stands at the com 
mencement of a long series of persecutions 
against the reformed faith, and in the course 
of this narrative we shall have to record many 
others of a like character. In the outset it may 
be well to observe, that we shall look in vain 
among the records of Spanish martyrolopy fur 
those distinct proofs of Christian triumph over 
pain and torment, which so often cheer the 
reader in perusing the narrative of sufferings 
endured by the victims of Komish j -i> euti< a 
in our own land. The last hours of the wit- 
for the truth in Spain were ;itten<K<l i,y 



* C>prian dc Valero r.pud Don A-.lolplio <lc Castro. London, 



TUB INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 01 

envenomed Roman Catholics ; in many cases, 
too, the sufferers walked gagged to the stake ; 
and there were no faithful friends present to 
record their final testimony. We are seldom 
cheered, then, we repeat, in the perusal of the 
roll of the Inquisition s victims by evidence 
that, in the midst of the fire, there walked 
with the sufferers one whose " form was like 
the Son of God." Still we have no reason to 
doubt that, among the victims of the Inquisi 
tion s rage, there were worthy members of the 
noble army of martyrs, cheered in their conflict 
by an invisible Support, and destined to wear 
hereafter a conqueror s crown. 

We have already alluded to the bigoted 
support which Charles v. gave the Inquisition 
when in his retirement at Yuste. lie was 
determined that after death his influence should 
be exerted in the same direction, for by his will 
he thus commended the office to the protection 
of his son, Philip ir. : 

" Out of regard to my duty to Almighty God, 
and from my great affection to the most serene 
prince, Philip n., my dearest son, and from the 
strong and earnest desire I have that he may be 
safe under the protection of virtue rather than 
the greatness of his riches, I charge him, with 
the greatest affection of soul, that he take espe 
cial care of all things relating to the honour and 
glory of God as becomes the most Catholic 
king, and a prince zealous for the Divine com 
mands ; and that he be always obedient to the 
commands of our holy mother the church. And 



92 THE INQUISITION. 

among other things, this I principally and most 
ardently recommend to him, highly to honour, 
and constantly to support the office of the holy 
Inquisition, as constituted by God against intel 
lectual pravity, with its ministers and officials ; 
because by this single remedy the most grievous 
offences against God can be remedied. Also I 
command him that he would be careful to pre 
serve to all churches and ecclesiastical persons 
their immunities." And in the codicil to his 
will he adds : " I ardently desire, and with the 
greatest possible earnestness beseech him, and 
command him by the regards of his most affec 
tionate father, that in this matter, in which the 
welfare of Spain is concerned, he be most zea 
lously careful to punish all infected with heresy 
with the severity due to their crimes ; and that 
to this intent he confer the greatest honours on 
the office of the holy Inquisition, by the care of 
which the Catholic faith will be increased in 
his kingdoms, and the Christian religion pre 
served." 

These dictates of anti-Christian bigotry and 
zeal were by no means lost upon the successor 
to whom they were addressed. The prisons of 
Spain were at this time gorged with Lutheran 
victims. On May 21, 1559, a royal auto da fe 
took place in the great square of Valladolid. 
There were present the prince don Carlos, tlu 
princess Jnana, and a great number of the 
grandees of Spain, together with a large multi 
tude of spectators. On this occasion fourteen 
persons were condemned to the stake, the sad 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 93 

remains of a woman with her effigy burned, 
and sixteen persons " reconciled," as it was 
termed, but in reality subjected to severe 
penances. Among these were the follow 
ing : 

Dona Eleonora de Vibero, the wife of 
Cazalla, an officer in the treasury, proprietress 
during her life of a chapel in the convent 
belonging to the Benedictines at Valladolid. 
After her death she was accused of Lutheran- 
ism, which opinions it was declared she had 
carefully concealed. Several witnesses had 
deposed, under torture, actually applied or 
threatened, that her house had been used by 
the Lutherans as a place of meeting. A sen 
tence of infamy was passed upon her name and 
that of her posterity, her property was declared 
forfeited, her body disinterred and committed to 
the flames, her house destroyed, and a monu 
ment, to which reference will be made hereafter, 
containing a record of her crime and punish 
ment, placed on the spot. 

One of the living victims was doctor Angus- 
tin Cazalla, a person of Jewish extraction, 
holding an office in the cathedral of Salamanca, 
a royal almoner and preacher. He, too, was 
accused of Lutheranism. Though he had at 
first denied the charge, he afterwards, under 
threat of torture, acknowledged its truth, but 
declared that he had never disseminated that 
doctrine, and pledged himself (so frail does 
human nature, when left to its own weakness, 
sometiaies prove under the effect of fear) to be 



94 THE INQUISITION. 

a good Catholic should his life be spared. The 
day before his death, a monk of St. Jerome had 
been sent to him to press upon him a further 
confession. lie declared that without falsehood 
he could confess no more, and he was exhorted 
to prepare for death, on the next day. The 
sentence was totally unexpected, and was 
received by Cazalla with no small agitation. 
The inquisitors remarked that if he desired his 
life to be spared, he must make a further con 
fession. " Then," said the wretched man, " I 
must prepare to die in the grace of God, for it 
is impossible to add anything to what I have 
already said, unless I lie." When lie arrived at 
the square, he asked that he might be allowed 
to speak to his fellow-sufferers, but this was 
denied him. Yet he found an opportunity to 
exhort his friends, with craven cowardice, to 
relinquish their doctrine, and die in the bosom 
of the Catholic faith. An eye-witness thus 
described his last moments : " After arriving at 
the scaffold, and seeing himself degraded with 
a cap on his head, and a rope round his neck, 
he was unable to refrain from tears ; and, 
among other expressions of penitence and con 
trition, lie publicly declared that ambition and 
malice had been the cause of his defection ; 
that it had been his intention to stir up the 
world, and disturb the quietude of these king 
doms by his novelties ; and for . 
than (bath* had b.-lii-v.-d he- would 1 

ted! l.y all Spain, as Lmhrr was in 
buxony, and that some of his disciples would 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 95 

take the name of Cazalla." * " We all know this 
hand." The sentiments here ascribed to Cazalla 
are not improbably foisted upon him by some 
Romish cross-examinator, whose only notion 
of Lutheranism was, that it was the way to dis 
tinction and celebrity. In consideration of his 
penitence, Cazalla (who had been the most elo 
quent of Spanish preachers) was strangled 
before burning. 

Another victim was Francisco de Vibero - 
Cazalla, brother of the former, accused, like him, 
of reformed doctrines. By some he is said to 
have at first declared his innocence of Lutheran- 
ism, but afterwards to have given way under 
torture, and professed penitence. By another 
writer, however, he is represented as having 
persevered in confessing Christ, and manifested 
grief and indignation when his brother urged 
him to recant. With his sister, Dona Beatrice 
de Cazalla, he was strangled, and their bodies 
burned. 

Alphonso Perez, master in theology, who 
had confessed under the torture, was also 
stripped of his ecclesiastical dignity, strangled, 
and committed to the flames. 

A lawyer of Toro, named Antonio Herrezuela, 
accused of Lutheranism, had manifested great 
indifference to the exhortations of doctor Cazalla. 
This so provoked one of the archers present, 
that he drove his lance into the body of the 
" heretic " whilst it was fastened to the stake. 
He is said to have sung psalms and hymns at 
* Gonzalo de Illescas. 



96 THE INQUISITION. 

the stake, and to have been much agitated when, 
under the influence of fear, his wife, who had 
also been apprehended, recanted. The closing 
address of her husband seems, however, to 
haue wrought upon the mind of the latter so 
much, that nine years afterwards she again 
professed herself a holder of Protestant doc 
trines, and suffered at the stake for them. 

Juan Garcia, a goldsmith, Perez de Ilerrera, 
a judge, Dona Catherine de Ortega, Catherine 
Roman de Pedrosa, Isabella d Estrada, Jane 
Blasquiez, were likewise accused of Lutheran- 
ism, though guiltless of any proclamation of the 
doctrines they believed. Torture extracted 
confessions from them, and they, with Gonzalex 
Baez, accused of being a Jewish heretic, all 
suffered. 

With these were many others who had 
abjured their heresies, and been "reconciled to 
the church." Don Pedro Sarmiento de Roxas, 
a knight of the order of St. Jago, with his 
nephew, Don Louis de Roxas, and his wife, 
Dona Mencia ; Dona Anna Ilenriquez de 
Roxas ; Dona Maria de Roxas, a nun ; Don 
Juan de Ulloa Pereira, a knight-commander of 
the ordiT of St. John ; Juan de Vibero Cazalla, 
with his wife, Dona Constance de Vibero 
< :.illa, (the latter being relatives of the 
> ilia of whom we have already spoken ;) 
Eleonora de Ciseneros, twenty- four years of 
age; Marina de Saavedra, a widow of rank; 
Antony \\ a^.r, an Englishman, and 1 
ha ; all appeared attired in the 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 97 

scapulary, and were then taken back to their 
prisons to await next morning the formal 
declaration of their sentence, which, though 
somewhat varying, usually consisted of infamy, 
confiscation, the wearing of the sambenito, arid 
confinement, sometimes for life. One of these 
poor victims was commended to the mercy of 
the princess-governess, as having thirteen 
children ; bnt it would appear without effect. 

On this occasion the princess Juanna, and 
Carlos the young prince of Asturias, took the 
usual oath that they would defend the holy 
tribunal and denounce before it cases of 
heresy. But the royal boy, then aged fourteen, 
derived an impression from the terrible scene 
he had just witnessed which sank deeply into 
his heart. 

On the 24th of September in the same year, 
another auto took place in the square of St. 
Francis in Seville. It was celebrated before 
the royal court of justice, the cathedral chapter, 
several grandees and noblemen, together with 
the duchess of Bejar, the inquisitors of the 
district, and a large assembly of spectators. 
On this occasion one appeared in effigy, 
twenty-one were burned,* and eighty were con 
demned to various penances. 

Among this multitude a few cases call for 
special notice : 

Francis Zafra was a priest at a church in 

Seville, holding a benefice of some consideration, 

and was accused of being a Lutheran. Before 

* Llorente, chap. xxi. 

P 



08 THE INQUISITION. 

this accusation had been made he had been 
employed in the service of the Inquisition, and 
had succeeded in promoting the escape of many 
who were denounced to that tribunal. This 
accusation had been made by a leata* whom 
he had admitted into his house, and to whom 
he had taught the doctrines of the Keformation, 
but as this woman had become deranged, she 
had been subjected to personal restraint. This 
treatment roused her to escape, and to lay a 
charge against the priest before the holy office, 
declaring that besides himself there were three 
hundred others tainted with the same heresy. 
In consequence of this information more than 
eight hundred persons were apprehended, and 
among the rest, Zufra himself. But as the 
priest maintained that the depositions of an 
insane person were not legitimate evidence, the 
proceedings became interrupted, and Zafra 
contrived to disappear. He was therefore only 
burned in effigy. 

Another victim of the Inquisition was brother 
Garcia de Arias, (called from his snowy hair the 
white doctor.) Though he had been often 
accused of Lutheranism, he was never suspected 
by the Inquisition, so zealous did he appear to 
be in maintaining the system of the holy office. 
He had l>een only recommended to be more 
prudent, and was trusted as before. The 
following fact in his career illustrates the -a 1 
lapses to which those who believe in the best 
*} btenis are liable, but it demonstrates also how 
A devotee. 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 99 

fatally calculated is the influence of such a fear 
as that which the Inquisition inspires, unless 
when counteracted by Divine grace, to repress 
the action of an awakened mind. At this time, 
hoAvever, when the incident referred to occurred, 
it is to be feared that the main actor had not 
spiritually received the truths which his judg 
ment embraced. 

A man named lliuz was accused of having 
preached unsound doctrine, and being sum 
moned before an inquisitorial body, went 
immediately to Arias, who was his friend, to 
state to him his embarrassment, and to ask 
advice from him how he might best defend 
himself. When he appeared at the tribunal, 
Arias, to his astonishment, confronted him as 
the chosen advocate of the papal side, and what 
was more confounding, he argued against his 
friend in such a manner as utterly to disconcert 
his previous preparation. Riuz " sank under 
this attack," Llorente tells us, and Arias was 
justly reprobated for his treachery by all his 
Lutheran acquaintances. Yet still he continued 
a secret Lutheran, communicating his opinions 
freely within the Avails of his convent, and with 
so much effect that the monastic observances 
became disregarded. When the alarm of 
danger was given, some of the brethren 
escaped, but Arias and many of his folloAvers 
were apprehended. The secret and hitherto 
most inconsistent disciple then appeared in 
more heroic colours ; he not only asserted his 
opinions without hesitation, but undertook to 



THE INQUISITION. 

defend in any manner selected for him the 
tenets he bad learned from the Bible ; and such 
ivas his reputation as a theologian that none 
dared to argue with him. His cowardice was 
disgraceful ; but his death in the flames was 
sustained with firmness. 

With him was another priest of Seville, who 
with h,s two sisters also had espoused the side 
the Reformation. This priest, Don Juan 
ronzafez, had been born a Moor, bur hud been 
previously brought before the Inquisition and 
compelled to renounce his heathenism. The 
three victims were consigned to death together 
wnpmg m the midst of the flames the 106th 
sjilm, and renouncing the errors of Komanism 
Among the victims one was conspicuous the 
Ie maintenance of whose principles stands in 
strong contrast with the case of Arias. This 
was Dona Maria de Bohorquez, in whose veins 
ran some of the best blood of Seville The 
charge of Lutheranism was brought agaiim 
her when she was not yet twenty-one years of 
ge. ttut she was a young woman of extra 
ordinary acquirements, and was extremely well 
versed in Protestant truths, as became a disciple 
Egidius. The terrors of the Inquisition 
could not bend her resolution. She avowed 
her belief, and maintained it to be the truth of 
rhis poor creature was submitted to th, 
J .ture, "Inch she bore with great I*** 

whV U T tl0 V v; s F Ut t0 htr in thi * state, 
vvhether her sister disapproved of her opinion^ 
She replied that .he did not; and became thus, 



THE INQUISITION IN SlAIN. 101 

probably without intending it, the means of 
compromising one of her nearest relatives. 
Maria de Bohorquez received sentence of death 
by burning. Before this news was conveyed 
to her, a deputation from the Inquisition 
visited her in prison. But the young heroine 
proved herself a match even for the doctors of 
the holy office, and they returned complaining, 
as the discomfited are apt to do, of the irre 
claimable obstinacy of their prisoner. A second 
deputation was appointed to visit her. Maria 
received them with the utmost courtesy, but 
told them that whatever their solicitude might 
be regarding her conversion, it could not sur 
pass her own, and that she had arrived at her 
conclusions after much care and examination, 
whilst she had derived confirmation in them 
from the difficulties experienced by her visitors 
in furnishing replies to her arguments. These 
were not statements likely to release this young 
confessor from the grasp of the Inquisition. 
She was therefore brought forth to die. At 
the place of execution, a Lutheran, who had 
abjured his opinions, endeavoured to persuade 
her to adopt the same course. But she resisted 
the attempt, declaring that she had no longer 
time to dispute, and that the hour was now 
come to think of the work of Christ. Desirous 
of saving one so young, a strong intercession 
was made by some spectators that her life 
might be spared provided she would recite the 
Creed. When this favour was granted, she 
immediately complied with the condition ; but 



102 THE INQUISITION. 

when the recital was finished, she began an 
exposition of it to the multitude in accordance 
with the principles of the reformed faith. This 
the inquisitors would by no means allow ; they 
silenced her testimony by strangling her at the 
stake, and afterwards burning her body. 
Other female scions of nobility perished with 
her. 

These two autos da fe were followed by a 
third, held on Sunday, October the 8th, 1559, 
in the grand square at Valladolid. This 
ceremonial was graced by the presence of 
Philip ii., who had now returned to Spain, his 
wife, Mary queen of England, having died in 
the November of the preceding year. Philip, 
who had narrowly escaped shipwreck in 
returning by sea to his native land, had made 
a vow, that if he touched terra finna again he 
would offer to God a solemn sacrifice of 
heretics. It was in fulfilment of this covenant 
that the present demonstration was about to 
take place. 

On this occasion a magnificent array of 
magnates and nobles attended on the king. 
Princes of the blood-royal, dignitaries of the 
church, ambassadors of France and Koine, 
dukes, marquesses, counts, grand-priors, 
knights, and ladies of the highest distinction, 
swelled his train. Before the commencement 
of the ceremonial, the inquisitor-general, pre 
senting himself before the king, demanded the 
usual oath, which the monarch with his sword 
drawn recited after him, 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 103 

At this time thirteen persons were burned 
alive ; the corpse of a dead man with his effigy 
was brought out, and sixteen -were present as 
penitents. Some of the victims deserve more 
particular notice. 

Among them was Don Carlos de Sesso, son 
of the bishop of Kacenza, distinguished for his 
learning and high office. He had been one of the 
great promoters of Lutheranism in Valladolid 
and its vicinity, and had, when exhorted to 
confess, requested to deliver his testimony in 
writing. This granted, he brought forth a 
remarkable paper, in which he maintained that 
the doctrines of the Reformation were those of 
the true church of Christ. He was led to the 
auto, and gagged in order to silence any attempt 
to proclaim his doctrine. As he moved to the 
place where Philip sat, he asked the king how 
he could permit a gentleman of his rank to be 
burned ? The reply was, " If my son were as 
bad as you, I myself would bring the wood to 
burn him ! " When the gag was removed at 
th e stake, and De Sesso was admonished to 
make confession, he cried out, "If I had 
sufficient time I would convince you that you 
are lost by not following my example. Hasten 
to light the wood which is to consume me." 

Pedro de Cazalla, a curate, and Dominic 
Sanchez, a priest, confessed to Lutheranism, 
and were strangled before burning. Doininio 
de Rojas, another priest, himself of the Domini 
can order, whose two brothers had already 
died by sentence of the tribunal, accompanied 



104 THE INQUISITION. 

him. When brought before the Inquisition, 
the Dominican had wavered in his testimony, 
and was ordered to be submitted to the torture. 
But he had been spared the question at his 
earnest request, and upon his promise to make 
further revelations. Though he had demanded 
to be reconciled to the church, he was consigned 
to death, a sentence the more rigorously executed 
from his having attempted to screen others whom 
he had previously denounced. When before the 
king, he exclaimed in his presence that he was 
about to die for the true faith, which was the 
Lutheran, adding, " I believe in the passion of 
Christ, which alone is sufficient to save all the 
world without any other work, more than the 
justification of the soul with (4od, and in this I 
believe for salvation." " Before he had ended 
these last words, the king," says DC Castro, 
who records the above facts, " ordered him to 
retire thence, but he threw his arms round a 
large post, and continued to insist on his 
opinions in such a manner that two friars were 
unable to disengnge him, until an officer fell 
upon him, putting u gag in his mouth, which 
was never removed till he died. There were 
accompanying him more than a hundred of his 
own order, admonishing and preaching to him. 
To all they said he replied, No, no, for not 
withstanding the gag, these words were under 
stood. Nevertheless, they pretended to have 
heard him say that he believed in the church 
of Home, and therefore they did not burn him 
He was strangled. 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 105 

Another Lutheran, i servant of Pedro do 
Cazalhi, Avas placed at the pile for execution, 
but as his cords snapped asunder in the flames, 
he leaped out in excruciating agony. This 
enabled him to catch sight of De Sesso, of whom 
we have already spoken, and the sight of his 
fortitude made the domestic so ashamed of his 
own pusillanimity, that from that moment he 
quietly submitted to his fate, asking only for 
more wood that he might burn like his com 
panion. 

Among the other victims was a nun, Doiui 
Marina de Guevarra, of the order of Cistercians, 
whose life the inquisitor-general greatly desired 
to save. She had been her own accuser. No 
thing, however, would avail for her release but 
a false confession. This she resolutely refused 
to make. She was sentenced because having 
heard some one repeat, with great frequency, the 
sentence " Being justified by faith, we have 
peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ," 
she believed the doctrine. She was strangled 
and burned. Some obscurity attaches to her 
dying declaration with respect to her belief in 
the great doctrine of justification by faith, for it 
was added that she could not explain in what 
sense she held it. 

On the place where the house of Dona 
Leonora de Yiterbo had stood, the Inquisition 
erected about this time a pillar of white stone, 
the inscription of which records the Luther- 
anism of the Cazallas, and the names of the 
king and the pope under whose administration 



106 THE INQU1SITIOK. 

the sentences of the Inquisition bad been exe 
cuted upon this family of heretics, i 
until the time of the French invasion, wL 
was levelled to the ground. " It is, however, 
says De Castro, "to our national sham<>, still 
preserved in the same locality where it was first 
erected. On the remainder of the site of that 
house the Jesuits founded a part of their col- 
! je." 

Philip ii. was not only present at the auto 
mentioned above, but went himself to the place 
of execution. On this occasion it appeared 
that all that gloomy bigotry which had here 
tofore formed so remarkable a feature in his 
character had now become congested upon his 
inmost soul. The full symptoms of this re- 
Jigious disorder soon broke out in the scheme 
the Spanish Armada. At present his per 
sonal attendants were ordered to assist in the 
execution of the victims of the holy oflice. 
Like the Inquisitors themselves, Philip had 
learned to think the terrors of the church its 
most acceptable offering to God. Woe unto 
them who call evil good, and good evil." 

It is, indeed, a melancholy spectacle to see, 
as in 1 hilip, the conscience darkened 
judgment enslaved and misdirected by a blind 
superstition. In his reign the time had come 
!..iyt.,ld by our Saviour when lie that kil 

is di>ciples should think that li 
vice. A mind so narrow and so cloc 

ns resembling tli 
* DC Cwtro i Spanish Protestants, j . 



Till-: INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 107 

different individual, one of the worst of the 
heathen persecutors of antiquity ; and so strik 
ing, indeed, does De Castro consider the points 
of contrast between the Spanish monarch and 
the .Roman Nero, that he has thus drawn the 
parallel : 

" Nero, during the frightful incendiary fire of 
proud Eome, ordered some Christians to be 
taken as criminals suspected of being concerned 
in that execrable crime. He punished as many 
as confessed being guilty of it, and reduced to 
close confinement all who were denounced as 
being culpable. 

" Philip ii., when the fire of heresy began to 
spread itself in Spain, filled the prisons with 
Protestants. 

" Nero added to the torment of those whom 
he held guilty, the disgrace of being dressed 
with the bloody skins of horrid and still palpi 
tating beasts. 

" Philip ii., after the pains and torments in 
flicted upon the clergy and gentry, despoiled 
of their rank and dignities, and stripped of 
their vestments, could feel complacency in 
seeing them covered with ridiculous sacks, 
on which the figures of toads and lizards 
were painted, to represent heresy, to gratify 
the pride of inquisitorial judges, and fill with 
terror and dismay an ignorant and fanatical 
populace. 

"Nero caused Christians to be torn in pieces 
by hungry dogs, or put them on crosses, and 
set fire to them by nightfall. 



108 THE INQUISITION. 

" Philip ii. ordered Protestants tube stran 
gled in the garotte, or to be gibbeted on the 
posts within which the fuel was kindled, to 
that those might burn the more conspicuously 
towards night, after the reading of the formal 
processes in the public square. 

" Nero readily offered his gardens for the 
inhuman spectacle of torturing delinquents. 

" Philip as readily lent the guards of his 
royal person to the executioners, in order that 
they might contribute their services in lighting 
the wood, the flames from which were to devour 
the bodies of the Protestants. 

"In the reign of this monarch," continues 
1 >e Castro, " there was no security for the lives 
of (he virtuous and innocent. Iniquity and 
hypocrisy, supported by a popular fanaticism, 
busied themselves with inquiries into the most 
minute circumstances of human actions. The 
domestic hearth, where love and virtue dwelt 
in peace, was cruelly invaded, false denounce 
ments were received as true, the cells of the 
holy office were crowded with victims, ami an 
inquisitorial jury delivered to the /lames, indis 
criminately, the bodies of ecclesiastics, of the 
nobility, the gentry, and principal peopl< 
Spain, whose ashes were ruthlessly 
to the winds, though worthy of being preserved 
in urns of marble." 

Notwithstanding, however, the rigour of the 
Inquisition, it is questioned by some how far its 
severities would have prevented the Reforma 
tion spreading, had not s.-me i-th- T antagonistic 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 109 

causes existed. These causes are by one writer 
represented as having been first, the interest 
felt by a large portion of the community in the 
newly discovered colonies of Spain, where the 
prospect of amassing gold deadened the mind 
to the pursuit of spiritual riches ; and se 
condly, to the fact that the lower orders of 
Spain had never readily lent their ears to new 
doctrines, and had never been friendly to in 
quiry in matters of religion. The ingenious 
author of " The Cloister Life of Charles v." thus 
ably delivers his opinion on this interesting 
question : 

" It would be curious to investigate the 
causes to which the repressive policy employed 
owed its success, and to discover the reasons 
why the Spaniard thus clung to a, superstition 
which the Hollander cast away ; why the 
strong giant, whose ilag was on every sea, and 
whose foot was on every shore, shrank to a 
pigmy on the field of theological speculation. 
Let it suffice to notice two points in which the 
victorious church possessed advantages in Spain 
which were wanting in countries where she was 
vanquished. The first of these was, the Inqui 
sition a police claiming unlimited jurisdiction 
over thought, long established, well organized, 
well trained, untrammelled by the forms of 
ordinary justice, and so habitually merciless 
as to have accustomed the nation to see blood 
shed like water on account of religious error. 
Before this terrible machinery the recruits of 
reform, raw, wavering, doubting, without any 



TIIE INQUISITION. 



clear common principle or habits of combina 
tion, were swept away like the Indi.u. 
Mexico before the cavalry and culverins of 
Cortes. 

11 The second advantage of the Spanish church 
was her intimate connexion with the national 
glory, and her strong hold, if not on the affec 
tions, at least on the antipathies, of the people. 
The Moorish wars, which had been brought to 
a close within the memories of men still alive, 
had been eminently wars of religion and of grace. 
They were domestic crusades, which had en 
dured for eight centuries, and in which the 
church had led the van ; and it was rather 
the cross than the castles and lions of Isabella, 
that supplanted the crescent on the red towers 
of the Alhambra. Since that day the church, 
once more militant under cardinal Ximcnes, had 
carried the holy war into Africa, and gained a 
footing in the lands of Turk and Saracen. 
All good Christians devoutly believed, with the 
chroniclers, that * powder turned against the 
infidel was sweet incense to the Lord. In 
in itself there were still a large population 
of Moorish blood, which made a garden of 
many a pleasant valley, and a fortress of many 
a mountain range ; and which, although Chris 
tian in name, was well known to be Moslem in 

Pj and secret practice, and to l.e anxiously 
look ,. great Turk for deliverance fr.. m 

tlir;i ry city, too, had its < 

P6W wretches who accumulat.-d untold 
wealth, eschewed pork, and continued tu 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. Ill 

the paschal lamb. Against these domestic dan 
gers the church kept watch and ward, doing, 
with the full approval of the Christian people, 
all that cruelty and bad faith could do to make 
Judaism and Islamism perpetual and impla 
cable. When the Barbary pirates sacked a 
village on the shores of Spain, or made prizes 
of a Spanish galley at sea, it was the church 
who sent forth the fathers of the order of Mercy 
to redeem the captives from African bondage. 
In Spain, therefore, heresy, or opposition to the 
authority of the church, was connected in the 
popular mind with all that was most shameful 
in their annals of the past, and all that was 
most hated and feared in the present time. In 
northern Europe, the church had no martial 
achievements to boast of, and few opportunities 
of appearing in the beneficent character of a 
protector or a redeemer. She was known 
merely in her spiritual capacity, or as a power 
in the state no less proud and oppressive than 
king or count ; or as the channel through 
which the national riches were drained off into 
the papal treasury at Rome. In the north, the 
reformer was not merely the denouncer of 
ecclesiastical abuses, but the champion of the 
people s rights and the redresser of their wrongs. 
But in Spain, the poor reformer, to his horror, 
found himself associated, in popular esteem, as 
well as in the Inquisition dungeons, with the 
Jew, the crucifier of babies, and the Morisco, 
who plotted to restore the caliphate qf the west, 



112 THE INQUISITION. 

Long after the excitement had passed away, a 
mark of the torrent remained in the proverbial 
phrase, in which the aspect of poverty was 
described as being ugly as the face of the 
heretic. " 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 113 



CHAPTER IV. 

THB INQUISITION IN SPAIN (continued.) 

IN the year 1560, another auto took place at 
Seville. This ceremonial was remarkable for the 
burning in effigy of Dr. Gil, (Egidius.) This 
celebrated man was nominated by Charles v. to 
the see of Tortosa, but had been denounced after 
death to the Inquisition as a suspected Lutheran. 
A characteristic occurrence marked the process 
adopted by the Inquisition. Oil this occasion a 
Dominican friar, named Domingo de Soto, was 
sent to Gil ; but being a traitor, he suggested 
that, in order to remove any occasion for dis 
pute, both he and Gil should agree upon a 
paper, which was to be a kind of summary of 
Christian doctrine. The Inquisition ordered 
this paper to be read by each of them in the 
cathedral of Seville. On that occasion De Soto 
preached, and when his sermon was concluded, 
he read, not the paper agreed upon with Gil, 
but another, totally different. As the cathedral 
was large, and Gil was at a distance from the 
pulpit, he did not hear what his pretended 
friend was reading ; but, suspecting no trea- 



- THE INQUISITION. 

chery, by signs lie testified his assent to the 
propositions which he supposed to be declared. 
After him Gil read his paper ; and the Inqui 
sition, taking advantage of the remarkable 
difference, imprisoned Gil as a heretic. He 
remained some time in prison, but retracted his 
errors in the cathedral of Seville, August 21st, 
1552,* and was condemned to one year s im 
prisonment and ten years deprivation. By 
some unknown means his imprisonment became 
much prolonged. On his release he went to 
Valladolid, where he associated much with Pro 
testants in private, and where he died. Four years 
after his death, the Inquisition, having learned 
the secret conferences which had occupied his 
latter days, ordered the exhumation of his 
body, which was burned in effigy. 

At this time, also, Constantino Ponce do 
Fuente was burned in effigy, having escaped 
by an ordinary death the vengeance of 
the Inquisition. lie was represented at this 
auto da fe by a figure clot lied in his garments, 
and stretching out its arms as if preaching. 
His property was confiscated and his bones 
were burned a miserable resource of impo 
tent bigotry. Constantino had been long c 
brated as a preacher, and when his arrest as a 
heretic had been mentioned to Charles v., 
exclaimed, " If Constantine be a heretic, he will 
prove a great one." Occupying a commanding 

* Hun ntntrmcnt dift ! t appears to real 

iiority. DC Castro * Spanish l roU-taut ; Lon- 
l"u: pp. 31, 35. 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 115 

position in Seville, lie had exercised much cau 
tion in disseminating his doctrines. The In 
quisition, however, suspected him, and had 
many conversations with him, being reluctant, 
on account of the eminence of his position, 
to come to extremities. Constantine well 
knew his danger. " They wish to burn me," 
he said, " but they find me yet too green." 
All his precautions, however, were rendered 
unavailing by an event which is thus related 
by De Castro : " A widow, whose name was 
Isabel Martinez, was taken prisoner for heresy. 
The Inquisition, according to its custom with 
every culprit, ordered the confiscation of her 
property. It appeared when seized to be of 
small value, for her son, anticipating her se 
questration, had concealed several coffers, con 
taining jewels of great value. But this pre 
caution was vain, because an infamous servant 
betrayed the secret, and gave information that 
the greatest and most valuable part of that 
lady s property was hidden in the house of her 
son. Upon this the inquisitors commissioned 
LeAvis Sotelo, an alguazil of the holy office, to 
communicate with the son, Francesco Beltran, 
respecting the stolen property. No sooner had 
the alguazil arrived than Beltran, without 
waiting to be asked any question, said, " I fancy 
I can guess that you are come about the things 
hidden in my mother s house ; if you will pro 
mise that I shall come to no damage by it I 
will show you what is there hidden. Without 
delay Beltran took Sotelo to the house of his 



11G THE INQUISITION. 

mother, and, taking n hammer, demolished a 
part of n lintel which was over a cellar con 
taining a number of books and manuscripts, 
the works of Luther, Calvin, and other re 
formers in the handwriting of Constantine 
Ponce de la Fuente." The discovery was fatal 
to Constantine. He was immediately arrested, 
and refusing to name his disciples and accom 
plices in the work of reformation, was com 
mitted to a damp cell, where he died of 
dysentery. On his memory, as we have already 
seen, the Inquisition endeavoured to heap in 
famy by burning him in effigy, and consuming 
his bones in the lire which, had he lived, would 
doubtless have destroyed his person. 

The case of an Englishman who perished in 
this auto deserves a little notice. Kiel- 
Burton, as he followed his trade at Cadiz, was 
visited by a familiar of the Inquisition under 
pretence of transacting business with him. A 
prolonged conversation took place, and the 
next day Burton was apprehended by the holy 
office. lie was there asked if he had spoken 
disparagingly of the lioinan Catholic religion. 
This he denied, but he was submitted to the 
torture, though the cruel process failed to ex 
tract any information from him. The Inqui 
sition condemned him to die by fire. lie met 
the flames with a heroic courage and a smiling 
countenance. One of the priests, struck by his 
. laimed, "The reason \\liv In- 
not seem to feel is to me vrry -vil -lit ; 
vvil has already got his soul, and the body 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 117 

is of course deprived of the usual sensations." 
Burton s property was confiscated. 

Similar treatment befel at the same time 
other foreigners, two of whom were English 
men, named Brook and Frampton ; and a 
Frenchman, of Bayonne, named Tabienne. 
The consequences of these measures had almost 
proved fatal to the commerce of Spain. It was 
at this auto that the prisoner of whom we have 
already spoken destroyed herself with a pair of 
scissors. Her body and effigy were burned. 

Though it is impossible for us to particu 
larize all the sufferers at successive autos, Ave 
must distinguish one case which demands 
especial notice. It is that of Dona Jane 
Boharquez, who was by marriage now Dona de 
Vargas. It will be remembered that her sister, 
previously to the auto mentioned in the last 
chapter, had, when under the influence of tor 
ture, inculpated her as having failed to reprove, 
though an elder sister, Maria s Lutheran opi 
nions. When she was committed to prison she 
was about to become a mother. Almost as 
soon as her infant was born it was taken from 
IHT, and she was removed to a common dun 
geon. Here she formed acquaintance with a 
poor young woman, (afterwards a martyr for 
the reformed doctrines,) who, commiserating 
her case, treated her with the utmost tender 
ness. This young girl was soon herself sub 
jected to the torture ; and when she returned 
to the prison covered with wounds, and with 
limbs dislocated at every joint, Jane Boharques 



118 THE INQUISITION. 

was in her turn called to perform the work of a 
comforter. It was not, however, long before 
the tribunal summoned her also. Instead of 
the iibual methods of torture, a cord was applied 
to the softer parts of her body, which being 
strained tight by n lever, not only cut through 
the integuments, inflicting thus the most ex 
cruciating torments, but by its pressure burst 
several internal vessels, so that torrents of blood 
streamed from her nose and mouth. She was 
carried back to the prison almost inanimate, 
and only survived eight days. In the auto da 
le* which next succeeded, this young mother, 
on whom such an extremity of suffering had 
been inflicted, was pronounced not to have been 
proved guilty. 

Such were some of the earlier autos of the 
modern Inquisition. They were followed by 
numerous others in all parts of Spain, and 
constituted in some districts an annual festival, 
the more frequent because of the rapid spread 
of Lutheraaism in that unhappy country. 

Gonsalvius Montdanus relates the following 
circumstance bearing reference to this period. 
It is one of many instances which illustrate 
the treachery and falsehood characterizing the 
proceedings of the holy office: 

Among those who suffered as the victims of 
til-- auto at Seville, were a pious motlu-r, h-r 
, and a niece. One of t 

brought beforo th<- inquisitor, 
wn " ; ; >g her simplicity, into 

conversation with her, professing sympathy 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 119 

with her sorrows, but endeavouring to extract 
information from her which might tend to the 
inculpation of others. After several days spent 
in familiar discourse, the poor girl, convinced 
of the fatherly affection which the inquisitor 
pretended to feel, and excited by the hope of 
release which he held out to her, made a full 
declaration of the doctrines she had been taught, 
and of the conversations which had passed 
between herself and her relatives. When he 
had gained this point, the crafty official caused 
her to repeat her statement in the presence of 
a notary, who recorded her confession. But 
when the moment of relief seemed to be near, 
this deluded victim found that, instead of the 
liberty which had been promised her, she was 
delivered to the torture in order thus to force 
from her what it was alleged she still concealed. 
She was submitted both to the rack and the 
trial by water, till the object of the inquisitorial 
tribunal had been fully gained. In her anguish 
she accused her mother, sister, and several 
others. They were apprehended, were sub 
mitted to the question, and were burned alive 
in the sumo fire as that by which, she herself 
was consumed. 

Great consternation was created throughout 
Spain, as well as other countries, by an event 
which at this time took place, namely, the arrest, 
at the instance of the Inquisition, of Bartolome 
de Carranza y Miranda, archbishop of Toledo, 
one of the highest dignitaries of the Spanish 
church. This ecclesiastic waf :\ Dominican 



1 20 tin: INQUISITION. 

friar, who in tlie early part of his history had 
been accused of Lutheran opinions, but who 
had succeeded in defending himself against the 
charge, lie rose to high honours in the church 
of Koine ; became professor of philosophy, 
qualifier of the Inquisition of Yalladulid, a 
member of the general chapter of the church 
of Konio, doctor of theology, and a censurer of 
prohibited books. As theologian of the em 
peror, and a celebrated defender of the ecclesi 
astical orders of his church, he was present at 
the council of Trent, and had accompanied 
Philip ii. to England, where he had been 
signally active in the proceedings taken against 
the Protestants. In 1588 he obtained, as a 
consequence of this activity, the post of primate 
of Spain; yet, before many months had passed, 
lie was accused of Lutheranism. Several causes 
co-operated to lead to so unexpected a charge. 
In the council of Trent he had pleaded against 
non-residence, and had afterwards written in 
support of his views. He had, moreover, in 
curred the dislike of many of his companions, 
and especially that of Melchior Caiio, bishop of 
the Canaries, and of Valdes, the inquisitor- 
ml. His " Commentaries on the ( ini-tian 
hi,m" had spoken with greater reverence 
ol thf 1 jible than of tradition, and had, besides, 

; published in the vulgar tongue. Many 
of his former pupils, who had become Luther 
ans, had, indeed, undergone his remonstrances 

their MIJ>J>"-- <i u) >rs but had not 1 

1 by him t the tiibunals. On several 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 121 

doctrines, as, for instance, that of justifica 
tion, he had shown himself more inclined to tho 
tenets of Luther than the Romish faith permitted. 
It was said that he had avowed such views in 
a sermon preached in London in the king s 
presence, and had on other occasions declared 
that indulgences were on sale in Spain, and 
had used language which led one of his hearers 
to remark : " Carranza has preached just as 
Philip Melancthon might be expected to have 
done!" He had, moreover, been falsely 
accused of speaking doubtfully respecting pur 
gatory, and he had pleaded for greater indul 
gence to convicted heretics. For these crimes 
he was brought under the notice of the holy 
tribunal. 

When his books were seized in the house of 
the marchioness d Alcanices, that lady declared 
that she once asked brother Juan cle Villagareiu, 
to what book the author had been indebted for 
his learning ; the reply was, " To a work of 
Luther." When examined by the Inquisition 
he said that his reference had been not to a 
work of Luther s, but of (Ecolampadius ; and 
that the archbishop, though he had derived 
some aid from Lutheran writings, had always 
been true to the Catholic doctrine. It appears, 
from a brief found among his papers, that the 
pope had given him leave to read heretical 
works.* Other depositions declared that Car- 

* In the year 1558, Philip n. passed a lav/ denouncing the 
punishment of death and confiscation against the sellers and 
readers of prohibited books. 



122 THE INQUISITION. 

ruiiza had said that if he were at the point of 
death he should wish to have a notary, in order 
to receive his renunciation of good works, be 
cause his reliance was only upon the merits of 
Jesus Christ for salvation ; but one of the 
witnesses explained that he understood this 
statement to be perfectly compatible with the 
maintenance of the doctrines of the Catholic 
church. Dr. Cazallu deposed that lie had heard 
Dominis de Roxas impute to Carrauza the doc 
trines of the Reformation. This Dominis do 
Roxas denied ; but when submitted to the 
torture, confessed that he had made such a 
statement, declaring, however, on further inter 
rogation, that it was not true. Juan de Regla 
voluntarily presented himself to the tribunal, 
declaring that when he was present at the 
death-bed of Charles v., Carranza had exhorted 
that monarch not to trust in any merits of his 
own, but to rely on the merit of Christ for the 
pardon of his sins. 

A number of charges of a similar kind were 
collected against Carranza, and Philip II. was 
unable to protect him. Indeed, he suffered 
himself to be persuaded that the archbishop 
was guilty of odious heresy. In answer to the 
applications of the inquisitors, the pope, Paul iv., 
at a meeting of the consistory, declared, " that 
being informed that the heresies of Luther and 
some others had been propagated in Spain, he 
had reason to suspect that several prelates ha-1 
adopted them, and in consequence he authorized 
the grand inquisitor, for two years from that 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 123 

day, to make inquest concerning all the bishops, 
archbishops, patriarchs, and primates of that 
kingdom ; to commence their trials ; and in 
case that an attempt to escape was suspected, 
to arrest and lodge them in a place of security ;" 
authorizing the inquisitor at the same time to 
report them to the sovereign pontiff, and to 
send the criminals, with their processes, to 
Rome, at the earliest possible period. The 
same decree authorized the Inquisition to im 
prison Carranza. 

All things being thus prepared, it was re 
solved to proceed against the archbishop ; and 
as Philip ii. was at this time absent from his 
kingdom, and as he dreaded the result of public 
processes, he wrote to his sister Juanna, who 
was the temporary regent, to instruct her in 
the measures which she should pursue. The 
princess accordingly wrote to Carranza, that 
as the king would speedily arrive in his own 
dominions, it was necessary that he should 
instantly repair to Valladolid to receive him, 
dispensing with all state, in order to secure his 
earlier arrival. The archbishop immediately 
prepared to obey the summons ; but as the 
messenger who brought the order had fallen ill, 
lie thought it better to await his restoration 
before leaving his home. On his way to court, 
the messenger having recovered, he held con 
firmations as usual. But these delays indi 
cated to the eyes of the inquisitors a secret 
intention of escaping, and they were resolved 
not to lose their prey. They proceeded, there- 



124 THE INQUISITION. 

fore, to the lodgings of the archbishop, who 
was then at Tordelogima, with :i strong party, 
conducted by Rodrigo de Castro, the beaver of 
the princess s letter. De Castro had com 
manded the host of the primate to leave the 
doors of his house open. As soon as they 
entered, guards were placed at the gates, and 
the inquisitors began to ascend the stairs, 
crying out, Open to the holy office." They 
proceeded to the archbishop s chamber. C ar- 
runza himself cried out "Who is it?" The 
reply was, The holy office ;" and the door 
was opened. The archbishop threw back the 
curtains of his bed, and Rodrigo, kneeling on 
one knee, and in tears, said, " Most illustrious 
seiior, your reverence will give me your hand 
and pardon me?" Carranza replied, "Why 
so, Dun Rodrigo? Pray rise." "Because," 
said Don Rudrigo, " I come to do a thing 
respecting which your reverence may sec in my 
face how contrary it is to my inclinations." 
Then, stepping back, he beckoned to the officers 
of the holy tribunal to advance. The order of 
the council of the Inquisition, signed by its 
general, Fernando de Valdes, Carranza s enemy, 
was then read to the archbishop. When ( ;u - 
ranza objected that he was subject to the pope 
alone, the inquisitor, Don Diego, exhibited the 
papal brief authorizing his arrest. 

Carranza was secretly conveyed to the prison 
of the holy office in Valladolid without being 
aware that he was in the Inquit-ition. Such 
pains were taken to conceal an event which, 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 125 

when known, filled the courts of Europe with 
consternation. 

The primate appealed to the pope, declaring 
that the inquisitor -general was prejudiced 
against him, and was, therefore, not an im 
partial judge. The appeal was obstructed by 
all the impediments which the holy tribunal 
could throw in its way. The pope, however, 
commissioned Philip n. to name another judge. 
He intrusted the trial to the archbishop of 
Santiago, who, shrinking from the responsi 
bility of presiding on such an occasion, dele- 
gated two councillors of the Inquisition, already 
in the interest of the inquisitor-general, to 
undertake it. 

Great difficulties occurred in bringing the 
trial of the archbishop to an issue. Some of 
these arose from the prelate himself, and some 
from the Inquisition. Two years elapsed in 
Challenging the judges ; then various adjourn 
ments suspended the cause still more ; and 
debates as to the place and mode of the trial 
caused a further delay of another two years. 
At last Carranza renewed his appeal to the 
pope to tnke him out of the hands of the Inqui 
sition. In the mean time the public mind 
became much excited on the subject of his 
trial ; and as a division of opinion existed in 
the council with regard to the proceedings 
against him, and as, moreover, during this 
delay a change had taken place in the papacy 
itself, the whole question became extremely 
embarrassed, and at length resolved itself into a 



] 26 THE INQUISITION. 

quarrel between the court of Rome on the one 
hand, and the holy office on the other. 

In the issue Carranza was removed to the 
Castle of St. Angelo at Rome, and succeeded, 
after an imprisonment of sixteen years, (in Spain 
and Italy,) in proving that the charge against 
him was without solid foundation. He pub 
licly said mass, to indicate his reconciliation 
with the Roman church, relinquished his office 
of archbishop, and was assigned a further im 
prisonment of five years, which was the next 
day, however, remitted by a special dispensa 
tion. The aged man was exhausted by these 
protracted processes, and died immediately after 
the termination of his trial, declaring his inno 
cence of the charges which had been exhibited 
against him. His death terminated a series of 
intrigues, perplexing and even dangerous to the 
high ecclesiastical powers, but strongly illus 
trative of the spirit by which the Inquisition 
was actuated ; of the suspicions indulged to 
wards the highest dignitaries not themselves 
members of its tribunal ; and of the inveterate 
hatred borne by the holy office towards every 
semblance of Lutheranism, that is, of gospel 
truth. 

Remarking upon the case of Carranza, the 
author of " The Cloister Life of Charles v." 
judiciously observes: "It seems but reason- 
to believe that he spoke the plain truth 
when he made the dying declaration that he 
had never held any of the hei. :i,.,l (.pinions of 
which hj had been accused. To i -ant 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 127 

who in these days looks into his very rare and 
still more tedious volume [his folio " Catechism 
of Christianity," which formed the main ground 
of the charges against him,] the Avork appears 
to breathe the fiercest spirit of intolerant 
Romanism. Heresy is reprobated ; Bibles in 
the vulgar tongue are condemned ; Spain is 
praised as the one land where the fountain of 
truth is still unpolluted ; Philip n. is exhorted 
to further persecutions ; Mary Tudor is ex 
tolled as the saviour of the soul of England." 
Carranza himself boasted that he had converted 
two millions of heretics. It would be absurd, 
therefore, to view him as a Protestant divine ; 
and perhaps we may, without any violation of 
Christian charity, regard his entanglement in 
the nets of the Inquisition as a merited retri 
bution for his own active services in hindering 
the work of the Spanish Reformation. 

Another interesting episode in the history of 
the Inquisition in Spain refers to the fate of Don 
Carlos, the son and heir of Philip n., who was 
condemned by a junta, of which the inquisitor- 
general was president, and was strongly be 
lieved to have been poisoned by his father on 
account of his attachment to the Lutheran doc 
trines. But our limits preclude us from de 
tailing the incidents of his singular and tragical 
history. It is enough to say, whether the 
charge of poisoning be established or not, that 
the transaction is a melancholy proof of bigotry 
and intolerance overcoming natural affection. 
Yet Philip s conduct in surrendering his sou to 



3 28 THE INQUISITION. 

the jurisdiction of the Inquisition has been 
lauded by a Roman Catholic divine as a sacri 
fice resembling that of the Almighty in giving 
up his own Son, and that of Abraham in 
yielding Isaac a.s a sacrifice. " There is no 
action," says the panegyrist, " to compare with 
this. The event leaves far behind it all those 
of which we read in profane history."* 

The trial of the archbishop of Toledo, to 
which reference has just been made, was by no 
means the only one of its kind. It was suc 
ceeded by the prosecution of several of the 
bishops who had taken part in the council of 
Trent men usually of the greatest learning and 
highest dignity, but who were compelled to 
humble themselves before the holy office. The 
professor of theology at Alcala Manciode 
Corpus Christi had approved of the propositions 
of Carranza, and had pronounced his opinions 
orthodox ; but, terrified by proceedings com 
menced against him, he saved himself from the 
fangs of the Inquisition by retracting, and pub 
lishing an almost universal condemnation of the 
archbishop. One of Carranza s disciples, Luis 
de la Cruz, was thrown into prison, when it was 
discovered that he was possessed of his master s 
papers, and was kept there, though without 
proof against him, during five years, nearly 
losing his life from illness. A singular incident 
illustrates the nature of some of tin-?.- proceed 
ings. Curtain propositions of Can -anxa s were 
placed before Juan de Pegna, professor of S 
* See De C*tro SpanUh Protettanti. 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 129 

manca, for his opinion concerning them. He 
returned a, favourable judgment, but as soon as 
lie heard of the arrest of the archbishop, he 
sent to the Inquisition, attempting to modify 
the opinion he had expressed, and was com 
pelled in the issue to retract and abjure it. 

The persecution of the Lutherans still went 
on. Atrocious calumnies, similar to those 
by which, in the early ages of Christianity, the 
primitive believers were assailed, were circulated 
respecting them, and, as if to render more 
striking the parallel between the year 15G1 and 
the period of infant Christianity, the occurrence 
of a destructive fire at Valladolid, by which a 
large number of its houses and much of its 
weal tli were destroyed, was attributed to the 
holders of the new opinions. So inveterate was 
the hatred borne to the reformed doctrines of 
Spain, that when a bull of the pope authorized 
confessors to absolve repenting Lutherans, the 
Inquisition refused to publish it. 

It is impossible to record at full length all 
the instances of injustice and suffering which 
blacken this period of the Spanish annals. Dr. 
Juan Perez, afflicted at the trials of the fol 
lowers of the reformed faith, wrote, about the 
year 1560, a letter from Geneva, " to console 
the faithful in Christ Jesus who suffer persecu 
tion for the confession of his name." 

In the same year, Julianillo Hernandez, or 

Julian the little, who, pretending to be a rustic 

travelling with bales of merchandise, contrived 

to circulate a very large number of Protestant 

E 



180 THE INQUISITION. 

works in Spain, was denounced to the holy 
ofhce, and was imprisoned in the dungeons 
of the Inquisition. In this confinement he 
remained for three years, oOen subjected to 
torture for the purpose of compelling him to 
confess any accomplices with whom he might 
have been associated, during which time many 
conferences took place between him and the 
inquisitorial officials, which he conducted with 
considerable success. He was at length 
brought forth to die at an auto da # on the 
22nd December, 15GO. He was carried out 
gagged, and hlo hands and feet were tied to the 
stake, about rhich he had contrived to gather 
an unusual qr entity of wood, that the severity 
t his torment* night be shortened. When his 
tongue was related, he was exhorted by the 
confessors to renounce his heresy. But Julian 
boldly rebuked them as hypocrites, and told 
em that nothing but the fear of a fiery death 
estrained them from avowing similar doct 
to those held by himself. He died with a OOO- 
rage and constancy which were extremely mor- 
Wying to his persecutors, and which k-fl a 
Btri 115 and favourable impression on the minds 
of all who witnessed his death, even on those of 
the executioners themselves. 

The most degrading scenes of tyranny and 

licentiousness were at this time practised by the 

imjuMtors. Multitudes of - fogfeyes 

their native country my, Holland, 

"I England. In .1, , h< | 

rt-namecl country a large house was fitted up 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 131 

by the bishop of London for Spanish worship, 
and sums of money were granted by Elizabeth 
to the Protestant refugees. These benevolences 
formed the ground of a special complaint made 
by Alvaro de la Cuadra, the ambassador of 
Philip n. ; and in the year 1508, John Man, 
dean of Gloucester, and ambassador of England 
to the court of Philip n., was expelled from 
Madrid, not for any violation of his diplomatic 
position, nor even for lending any aid to the 
victims of the Inquisition, but because he had 
spoken too freely of religious matters in ordi 
nary conversation. This offence was, that at a 
public banquet he had declared Philip n. to be 
the only one among the sovereigns of Europe 
who had the privilege of defending the pope. 

Under the auspices of Philip n., the papal 
power, in virtue of its assumed right to divide 
empires according to degrees of longitude, 
granted a bull to the inquisitor-general of Spain, 
instituting " the Inquisition of the Galleys." 
Cadiz was principally noted for the exercise of 
this authority. By this bull, the officers of the 
Inquisition were empowered to enter all vessels, 
in order to seize prohibited books. But this 
interference with commerce was too outrageous 
to be long tolerated, and the new institution 
speedily became obsolete. This bull was issued 
in the year 1571. 

Ten years after this period we find recorded 
another awful instance of the power of 
bigotry to dry up the sources of natural 
affection. A gentleman of Valladolid de^ 



1 32 THE THQUISITION. 

nounced two of his own daughters to the 
Inquisition as Lutherans. Instead of being im 
prisoned, however, according to the usual mode, 
these young persons were permitted to remain 
under the parental control, that the father (who 
was much in the confidence of the officials) 
might endeavour, by the assistance of church 
men and monks, to disabuse them of their che 
rished opinions. This scheme, however, failed ; 
and the rage of the father was excessive. He 
carried them, therefore, to the Inquisition, and 
complained of their wicked obstinacy. Both 
were condemned to die. The wretched father, 
with brutal bigotry, went himself into the woods 
to cut down materials for the fire which was to 
burn them. The inquisitors, with no less bar 
barity, praised his conduct, and held him up as 
an example to the sons of the church. Stimu 
lated by these praises, the miserable slave of 
ecclesiastical bondage went even yet further. 
He asked leave of the inquisitors to set fire to 
the pile with his own hand. His request was 
granted, and the inquisitors, " in order to the 
exaltation of the Catholic faith, proclaimed, with 
cymbals and trumpets, not only the inhuman de 
mand, but their permission to comply with it." * 
In mercy to the human race, however, this 
baneful tribunal, which originated so mucli >uf- 
fering, was to experience a decline of inflm net; 
and power. This was noticeable in the ivitrn 
of Philip in., who ascended the throne in 

- 1). Cbtro> Spanish Protestant*, chap. xvii. The autho 
rity h in Valera TreUdo de Lo Papas. 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 183 

Yet, in spite of the decay of its power, it pro 
bably indirectly suggested the final expulsion of 
the Moors from Spain. This remarkable trans 
action, however, does not necessarily come 
within the scope of our volume. 

The accession of Philip iv., in 1621, was 
commemorated by an auto da fe at Madrid. 
On this occasion no heretic was burned. This 
monarch gave the Inquisition power to deal 
with smugglers, and permission to retain a 
fourth part of the money they might find on 
Spaniards quitting their own country. 

The year 1620 is noticeable in the annals of 
the Inquisition for the imprisonment of William 
Lithgow, a Scotchman, who was incarcerated 
on the pretext that he was a spy in the pay of 
the English navy. From this circumstance it 
is obvious that the Inquisition had gradually 
passed from a spiritual court to a tribunal 
taking cognizance of secular matters. The 
extraordinary sufferings which Lithgow en 
dured are well worthy of being recorded, and 
as his narrative is a long one, and written in 
obsolete language, we shall present it to the 
reader in an abridged form. 

Immediately after Lithgow s imprisonment 
he was searched and deprived of a considerable 
sum of money, which he had provided for 
his extensive journeys. He was then put 
in irons, having a bar of some length so 
fastened between his ankles that it was totally 
impossible for him to stand. " The irons," he 
says, " were thrice heavier than my body." 



13 1 THE INQUISITION. 

The governor visited him in his cell, and 
exhorted him to confess himself a spy : and on 
the prisoner declaring his innocence, he threat 
ened with great anger that torture should rnako 
him acknowledge it. Lithgow was allowed 
neither any bed, pillow, nor coverlet." Close 
up," said the governor, this window in his 
room with lime and stone. Stop the holes in 
the door with double mats, hanging another 
lock to it, and so withdraw visible and sensible 
comfort irom him. Let no tongue nor feet be 
heard near him." During many days Lithgow 
was thus imprisoned. He was then takm 
away in a coach to a wine-press house 
standing alone among vineyards." To this 
pace the instruments of torture had },, ( n 
already brought. Finding he would make DO 
xmfession, the executioner was ordered to take 
>ft his irons. In accomplishing this difficult 
task, he struck off," Lithgow tells us, above 
an inch of my left heel with the bolt, where 
upon I grievously groaning, being exceeding 
faint, and without my three ounces of bread 
and a little water for three days together, the 
alcalde said, Oh ! traitor, all this is nothing 
bu the earnest of a greater bargain you have 
m hand. Lithgow was then submitted to the 
torture of the pulley, the rack, and the water. 
In the course of the last infliction, as the sufferer 
closed his lips to prevent the passage of tl,,. 
r through them, the ex. , lsw i an 

ron weapon to force them op.-n. 1 Miring these 
processes, his examination continued without 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 135 

interruption. He proceeds : " Thus lay I six 
hours upon the rack, between four o clock in the 
afternoon and ten o clock at night, having had 
inflicted upon me threescore and seven torments. 
Nevertheless they continued me a large half hour, 
after all my tortures at the full bending, where, 
my body being all begored with blood, and cut 
through in every part to the crushed and 
bruised bones, I pitifully remained, still roar 
ing, howling, foaming, bellowing, and gnashing 
my teeth, with insupportable cries, before the 
pains were undone, and my body loosed. True 
it is, it passeth the capacity of man either 
sensibly to conceive, or I patiently to express, 
the intolerable anxiety of mind and affliction of 
body in that dreadful time I sustained. 

11 At last my head being by their arms 
advanced, and my body taken from the rack, 
the water re-gushed abundantly from my 
mouth ; then they, reclothing my broken, 
bloody, cold, and trembling body, being all this 
time stark naked, I fell twice into a trance, when 
they again refreshed me with a little wine and 
two warm ggs ; not done out of charity, but 
that I should be reserved for further punish 
ments ; and if it were not well known that these 
sufferings are true, it would almost seem incre 
dible to many that a man being brought so low 
with starving hunger and extreme cruelties, 
could have subsisted any longer reserving life. 

" And now, at last, they charged my broken 
legs with my former eye-frighting irons ; and 
this done, I was lamentably carried on their 



136 TIII: INQUISITION. 

arms to the coach, being afterwords brought 
and secretly transported to my former dungoon, 
Avithout any knowledge of the town save only 
these my lawless and merciless tormentors. 
Where, when come, I was laid with my head 
and my heels alike high on my former stones. 
The latter end of this wofnl night poor mourn 
ing Hazier the Turk was sent to keep me, and 
on the morrow the governor entered my room, 
threatening me still with more tortures to con 
fess ; and so caused he every morning, long 
before day, his coach to be rumbled at his gate, 
and about me where I lay, a great noise of 
tongues and opening of doors, and all this they 
did on purpose to affright and distract me, and 
to make me believe I was going to be racked 
again to make me confess an untruth ; and still 
thus they continued every day for five days till 
Christmas."* 

After a variety of protracted tortures, some 
English merchants of Malaga accidentally dis 
covered the place of Lithgow s imprisonment, 
and by the intervention of the English consul, 
obtained his release. Soon after his arrival in 
England, in 1021, James I. visited him, and 
promised to obtain compensation for his in 
juries. This promise, however, appears npver 
to have been fulfilled, and Lithgow died a 
prisoner in the Marshalsea. 

A fi.>w years later, George Penn, an English 
iii Tchai.t ivsiding in the south of Spain, and an 
uncle of iho well-known William IVnn, sutured 
Narrative of William Litligow. 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 137 

&t the hands of the Inquisition treatment even 
more severe than that endured by Lithgow. 
Although a Protestant, he had committed the 
great error of forming an alliance with a Roman 
Catholic lady, and being suspected of having 
endeavoured to seduce her from her faith, he 
was suddenly arrested, and committed to a 
loathsome dungeon, \vhile his property, down 
to the very nail in the wall of his house, was 
seized and confiscated. At successive intervals 
he was scourged, till his body was one mass of 
festering sores. Three years having elapsed, 
he was brought into the torture chamber, and 
racked in so excruciating a manner, that his 
constancy failed, and in a moment of weakness 
lie admitted all the charges brought against 
him, and promised to live and die in tht 
Romish faith. " As soon," says the narrator of 
the facts, " as he was sufficiently recovered from 
his wounds to walk, he was taken to the greal 
cathedral of Seville in solemn procession, accom 
panied by the seven judges, their households 
by several hundred priests and friars, and by a 
vast multitude of people, and in the presence ot 
the whole congregation was exposed as a signal 
instance of the great mercy of the holy Inquisi 
tion. His wife was taken from him, and for 
cibly married to a good Catholic ; the whole ol 
his estate, amounting in plate, furniture, jewels, 
goods, and merchandise, to twelve thousand 
pounds, was confiscated ; the money found in 
his hands, belonging to other persons, was 
seized ; and he was finally commanded to quit 
2 



138 THE INQUISITION. 

the country in three months, on pain of death. 
This last injunction only added insult to injury, 
for the judges well knew that, having seized his 
estates, the moment he left the cathedral he 
would be arrested for debts which lie had no 
means of discharging. The very same day he 
was thrust into a common jail, with little or no 
hope of ever obtaining a second release. 

The exhibition in the cathedral being public, 
several English residents in Seville were present, 
and the intelligence of his brother s position 
soon reached the young admiral Penn at his 
station in the channel. His measures were 
prompt and characteristic. Instead of appealing 
to Cromwell, in whose day the event occurred, 
and setting the dilatory diplomacy of London 
and Madrid at work to procure his release, lie 
seized in one of his prizes a Spanish nobleman, 
Juan de Urbino, then on his way to Flanders, 
where he held the post of secretary to the 
government, stripped him naked like a common 
prisoner, and treated him with many indig*. 
nities. 

This act, indefensible in itself, spoke home to 
the Spanish sovereign ; and George Perm was 
soon released, and sent back to England. 

The death of Cromwell prevented any repa 
ration being made for his losses and sufferings ; 
but when the restoration was fflvctfd, ! 
Charles appointed him his envoy at the con: 
Spain, to ;i i 1 weight to his claim for dan:., 
in body and estate. This act of substantial 
justice, however, came too Jat-.-. lIis aged flesh 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 139 

had been torn, his limbs dislocated and ill set, 
his body starved for more than three years on 
bread and water ; and he died in London only 
a few weeks after receiving the royal appoint 
ment, leaving his claims as a legacy to the 
admiral and his family."* 

This restitution, however, was never made. 
The Inquisition has never been remarkable for 
disgorging its prey. 

Philip iv. died in 1G65, and was succeeded 
by Charles n. The inquisitorial tribunals were 
occupied during his reign mainly in prosecu 
tions of witchcraft. On his marriage, however, 
an auto da fe took place, in which a hundred 
and eighteen victims appeared, nineteen of 
whom were burned. The circumstances of this 
auto have been already related in chapter n. 
Charles H. was succeeded by Philip v. (the 
grandson of Louis xiv. of France.) The Inqui 
sition, from being a religious, now became 
mainly a political instrument, and was main 
tained by Philip in accordance with the advice 
of the grandfather who had placed him on the 
throne. Freemasonry was at this time the 
principal subject of inquisitorial search. Indeed, 
the doctrines of the reformed religion were 
extinct an awful instance of man s power 
seeming to prevail over the truth of God. 

It was during this reign that Isaac Martin, an 
Englishman, being found at Malaga with u 
Bible and other books of devotion in his pos 
session, was accused of being a Jew, and finding 
* Hepworth Dixon s Life of Penn. 



140 THE IXQUISITION. 

himself exposed to considerable nnnoynnco irt 
consequence, came to a resolution to quit the 
country. This intention having transpired, he 
was seized, and carried to the Inquisition at 
(Jranada. lie was charged with having spoken 
disrespectfully of the Koman Catholic religion. 
After a long imprisonment, and many cross- 
examinations, he was ordered to be banished 
from the Spanish dominions ; was seated on an 
nss, and whipped with two hundred lashes as 
he went along. lie was then sent to Malaga, 
where, after some adventures, he contrived to 
get on board an English ship, and effected his 
escape. A small portion only of the effects 
which had been taken from him was ever 
recovered. 

Dining the reign of Ferdinand vi. (com 
mencing in 174C) only ten persons were burned 
alive. This number, half of which would be 
enough to excite, in the present day, a convul 
sion in the darkest state of Europe, was really, 
in comparison with the past, an indication of 
rapidly advancing progress. The victims wer 
Jews who had renounced, if they had ever held 
the Christian faith. The revival of learning 
lent its aid at this period to the depression of 
persecution. Its influence continued through 
the succeeding reigns of Charles HI. and Charles 
IV. Jn th.- former reign, the inquisitor-general 
even toed t > propose the purification of the 
Voly office. In the latter, Don Miguel Solano, 
*ho in earlier times would have been bui n,>d as 
a heretic, was only pitied as a maniac. 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 141 

It is not our purpose to relate the series of 
intrigues by which Napoleon Bonaparte invaded 
Spain in the year 1806, though he was unable, 
even by the aid of the strong military force 
which he sent to occupy that kingdom, to 
retain its possession. Suffice it to state, that 
when he set up his staff near Madrid, he 
wrote an order to abolish the Inquisition, which 
was carried into effect. It had been well if 
all the other actions of Napoleon had been of 
so beneficial a character.* 

On the recal of Ferdinand vii. in 1814, one 
of his earliest measures was the re-establish- 
nient of the holy office. Though, whilst restor 
ing, he professed to reform it, suspicions and 
delations resumed their empire. In 1816, it 
letter from Rome announced that the pope (Pius 
vn.) had forbidden the use of torture, and assi 
milated the proceedings of the holy office to 
those of other tribunals ; with what effect, how 
ever, the succeeding narrative will demonstrate. 
It is extracted from a work published by Don 
Juan Van Ilalen, a military officer of some dis 
tinction in the Spanish service, who, after his 
escape from the fangs of the holy office, asso 
ciated himself with the army of Russia, and 

* An interesting narrative of some of the events connected 
with the destruction of the building of the Inquisition in 
Madrid, purporting to be based upon authentic information, 
was a few years at;o published in the American journals. Not 
having been able, however, to satisfy ourselves as to the cor 
rectness of its facts, we prefer omitting it, being unwilling to 
swell, by the addition of doubtful testimony, the heavy roll of 
well-authenticated charges which can at present be adduced 
against this tribunal. 



142 THE INQUISITION. 

was subsequently appointed commander-in-chicf 
of the Belgian provisional government. 

In consequence of having taken office under 
Joseph Bonaparte, Van llalen, we may \ 
misc, had become an object of suspicion to 
Ferdinand and his government. One night he 
had occasion to leave home very late. "An 
hour alter, the house was surrounded by sol 
diers, and two men enveloped in their cloaks 
advanced towards the door. My servant, who 
heard the loud and repeated knocks, appeared 
at the window, and was ordered by them to 
open the door. On his refusing to do so, they 
gave their names, one being the governor Irri- 
berry, and the other the senior inquisitor. 
(The scene is Murcia, where the building for 
merly appropriated to the Inquisition was now 
standing in ruin.) The servant represented 
to them that, whatever might be their ofhce or 
their authority, they raised unfavourable sus 
picions by coming at that hour, and that if they 
did not withdraw he would compel them, at the 
same time showing his carbine at the window. 
At this sight the senior inquisitor, fearing the 
consequences, abandoned the field to Irriberrv, 
who, more bold, caused some soldiers to advance 
and force the door open ; he then entered with 
his soldiers, to whom lie gav> to secure 

tin- servant, and search the IIMM-. Whilst tin y 

iting these commands, they discov i 
the cook in the act of leaping from a window, 
and endeayotiring to make her escape, with the 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 143 

intention of seeking me and warning me of the 
danger." 

Van Ilalen having, without any suspicion of 
his own danger, returned in the morning to 
his residence, was immediately arrested. 

" It was now," he continues, " that I learned 
for the first time the fatal destiny which awaited 
me. The day was dawning, and Irriberry 
ordered, in my presence, the bishop s carriage to 
be fetched, that I might be conveyed to the 
Inquisition. I requested to be allowed to go on 
foot, to which he replied that the prisoners of 
the Inquisition were never accompanied there 
by an armed force ; adding, ironically, * they 
have always the honour to be taken there in a 
convenient carriage. This being now ready, 
I ente.red it, accompanied by Irriberry, his 
assessor, and his aide-de-camp, who gave orders 
to some soldiers to follow the carriage on foot, 
at a distance. Thus I lost sight of my home, 
my servants, my young comrades, and even of 
the hope of seeing again the light of day." 

lie was for some time confined, meeting at 
first with fair words from his keepers, but the 
scene speedily changed. His narrative, how 
ever, must again speak for itself. 

" About eight o clock one night, Don Juanito 
entered my dungeon with a lantern in his hand, 
followed by four other men, whose faces were 
concealed by a piece of black cloth, shaped 
above the head like a cone, and falling over the 
shoulders and chest, in the middle of which 
were two holes for the eyes. I was half asleep 



144 THE INQUISITION. 

when the noise of the doors opening awoke mo, 
and by the dim light of the lantern I perceived 
these frightful apparitions. Imagining I was 
labouring under the effects of a dream, I 
earnestly gazed awhile on the group, till one of 
them approached, and pulling me by the 
leather strap with which my arms were bound, 
gave me to understand by signs that I was to 
rise. Having obeyed the summons, my face 
was covered with a leather mask, and in this 
manner I was led out of the prison." 

Having been solemnly and earnestly warned 
by the inquisitor to make a confession of hid 
guilt, he was now subjected to a treatment which 
must fix upon the modern Inquisition, if Van 
Halen is to be received as a credible witness, 
the stigma of having adopted a procedure 
worthy rather of the dark ages than of the 
nineteenth century. 

" The agitation of the moment," he confesses, 
" permitted me to utter only a few words, which, 
however, were not listened to, and I was hurried 
away to the further end of the room, the jailor 
and his assistants exerting all their strength to 
secure me. Having succeeded in raising me 
from the ground, they placed under my armpits 
two high crutches, from which I remained sus 
pended, after which my right arm was tied to 
the corresponding crutch, whilst the left briuir 
kept in a horizontal position, they encased my 
hand opm in a wooden glove extending to the 
wii>r, which shut very tightly, and from which 
two large iron bars ran ai iJi as th- 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 145 

keeping the whole in the same position in 
which it was placed. My waist and legs were 
similarly bound to the crutches by which I was 
supported, so that I shortly remained without 
any other action than that of breathing, though 
with difficulty." 

In this position a leading question was put to 
him, shaping itself towards an affirmative admis 
sion. But the prisoner denied the charge. 

" The glove which guided my arm, and 
which seemed to be resting on the edge of a 
wheel, began now to turn, and with its move 
ments I felt by degrees an acute pain, espe 
cially from the elbow to the shoulder, a general 
convulsion throughout my frame, and a cold 
sweat overspreading rny face. The interroga 
tory continued, but Zorilla s question of * Is it 
so? Is it so? were the only words that 
struck my ear during the excruciating pain I 
endured, which became so intense that I 
fainted away and heard no more the voice 
of these cannibals. When I recovered my 
senses, I found myself stretched on the floor of 
my dungeon, my hands and feet secured with 
heavy letters and manacles, fastened by a thick 
chain, the nails of which my tormentors were 
still riveting. On this being concluded, the 
unpleasant mask which obstructed my sight 
was removed. ... It was after much diffi 
culty that I dragged myself to bed. I spent 
the whole of the night struggling with the 
intense pains, which were the effect of the 
torture, and with the workings of my excited 



14 G THE INQUISITION. 

mind, which offered but a horrible perspective 
to my complicated misfortunes. This state of 
mental agitation, and the burning fever which 
was every moment increasing, soon threw me 
into u delirium, during which I scarcely 
noticed the operation performed by my jailors 
of opening the seams of my coat to examine the 
state of my arm." 

After many attempts, Van Halen contrived 
to escape from his tormentors.* 

To statements of sufferings like those just 
narrated, resting, as they necessarily must, 
upon the testimony of one individual, it is easy 
for Koman Catholic writers to give u denial, 
and to maintain that they are either exaggera 
tions or misrepresentations. But even the 
most candid reader must admit, after the peru 
sal of the following case of Spanish intolerance, 
that there is only too much reason to believe 
the darkest accusations brought against tho 
tribunal. 

" A schoolmaster of Busafa,f a village in the 
neighbourhood of Valencia, was reputed to 
be a quaker. He was accused before the 
tribunal of the faith, condemned, and thrown 
into the prisons of St. Narcissus, with the vilest 
felons. The lord of the tribunal of the faith," 
says my informant, a priest of Valencia, " en- 

Narrative of Escape of Don Juan Van Halen. 

t This incident is e\ true ted from tin- Kev. Mr. Kule s" Brand 

mir," n vnhuil.lr work upon the InquiMtion. t<> whu-li 
we acknowledge obligation. lie lived for sonic time in :*, 

M himself satisfied with the evidence on which 
the statement rciU. 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 147 

deavoured to induce him to make a solemn 
recantation of hig belief as a quaker, but lie 
said that he could not do anything against his 
conscience, nor could he lie to God. They 
condemned him to be hanged, and he was 
transferred to the condemned cell, and resigned 
himself fully to the will of God. On July 31, 
1826, he was taken from the prison to the 
scaffold, displaying the most perfect serenity. 
The crosses were removed from the scaffold. 
He was not clothed in the black dress usually 
put on culprits when brought out to execution, 
but appeared in a brown jacket and pantaloons. 
With a serious countenance and unfaltering 
mien he ascended the scaffold, conducted by 
father Felix, a barefooted Carmelite friar, who 
exhorted him to change his views. But he 
only replied, Shall he who has endeavoured 
to keep God s commandments be condemned ? 
When the rope was put around his neck, he 
asked the hangman to wait a moment, and 
raising his eyes towards heaven, prayed. In 
three minutes he ceased to live. I have been 
shown the spot, and have conversed with some 
who saw * the quaker schoolmaster die." 

After the death of Ferdinand, various 
political changes occurred in Spain, and in 
1834 the Inquisition was again abolished. 
Whether, however, this is a temporary or a 
permanent abolition remains to be proved. 
That its extinction did not take place too soon 
will be evident from the following summary of 
the number of victims who suffered under its 



MS THE INQUISITION. 

rule. Llorente is the authority upoii which it 
is given, and us the investigation of the annals 
of the holy office was intrusted to him by the 
French, he had every opportunity of procuring 
accurate details. The list extends from Mttl 
to 1809. 

Condemned and burned . 31,912 
Burned in efligy . . . 17,G59 
"Penitents" .".... 291,450 

341,021 

Those who would read the history of the 
peninsula, especially that of Spain, aright, 
must peruse it by the ilames of the Inquisition. 
That light will show how a nation heretofore 
distinguished by noble bearing and manly 
independence, became under its influence 
morose, narrow, gloomy, and craven-hearted. 
Beneath that power, its literature declined, its 
liberty departed. The blast from the desert is 
not so destructive as is the withering efl ect of 
continued religious intolerance. If Spain has 
btood in modern history among the lowest of 
kingdoms, unequal to every crisis, barren, 
though not without noble exceptions of great 
ness and moral power ; if freedom has no truo 
asylum within her shores ; above all, if it have 
little which represents the lofty Christianiiv < I 
Jesus and his apostles, but is overrun by 
monks, blinded by superstition, and prolific in 
a costly glare of external show, which has no 
corresponding spiritual reality she owes the 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 149 



desolating change- to the system from 

she at first recoiled, but which she afterwards 

blindly regarded as her boast and honour the 

Inquisition. 

The machinery of the holy office was intro 
duced by Spain into her South American 
colonies. The institution had its seat at Lima, 
and fairly rivalled the barbarities of the tri 
bunal in the mother country. Till lately the 
traces of its operation might not unfrequently 
be seen in the mangled and dislocated limbs of 
some of the Lirnanese. " A Spaniard," says 
Tchsude, " whose limbs were frightfully dis 
torted, told me, in reply to my inquiries, that 
he had fallen into a machine which had thus 
mangled him. A few days before his death, 
however, he confided to me that in his twenty- 
fourth year he had been brought before the 
tribunal of the holy Inquisition, and that by the 
most horrible tortures he had been compelled 
to confess a crime of which he was not guilty. 
I still shudder, when I remember his crushed 
and twisted limbs, at the thought of the ago 
nies which the unhappy wretch must have 
endured." 

On one occasion its power met with an unex 
pected check. The viceroy, Casttl Fuerte, was 
denounced to it by his confessor as a heretic. 
He was summoned accordingly before the holy 
office, always eager to show its authority, even 
over the highest. He went, entered the hall 
of judgment, took out his watch, and said, 



150 TUB INQUISITION. 

" Senores, I am ready to discuss this affair, but 
for one hour only ; if I am not back by that 
time my officers have orders to level this 
building with the ground." And, indeed, at 
that very time his body-guard, a company of 
infantry, with two pieces of artillery, had taken 
their station before the building. The inqui 
sitors, aghast at this information, consulted 
together during a brief colloquy, then, with 
officious eagerness, complimented Casttl Fuerte 
out of their establishment. 

The same fettering influence upon the human 
mind, exerted by the Inquisition in the parent 
country, seems to have been produced by its 
operation in Spanish South America. "Na 
ture," says a French writer, " has here invited 
man by her solitudes to vast thoughts, and to 
kingdoms gigantic as her own. But man re 
mains motionless ; an invisible power binds his 
arms. Three centuries pass, and everything 
withers around him. In the midst of virgin 
forests not one new thought starts to life. The 
morning breath of the universe passes over the 
forehead of this old man, and cannot revive 
him. What mean these cradles of empires, 
Mexico, Kio Janeiro, Buenos Ayres, Lima, 
which from the first day wear the wrinkles of 
Byiantium? . . . lie sees this unspotted world, 
and comprehends it not. Sad and motion! 
he seats himself by the banks of the great 
rivers, having only recollections in n world 
which has no past ; and the choir of worship 
from so many new creatures adds not a single 



THE INQUISITION IN SPAIN. 151 

accent, form, or note to his liturgy. The 
Catholicism of the Council of Trent throws 
over these nations the dark shadow of Philip n. 
On the other hand, a breath reaches them from 
France and North America, and torments them 
with an inextinguishable desire for liberty. 
Between these two opposite forces what is the 
result ? These nations are agitated with a 
hopeless movement. Whatever they do they 
end by realizing in politics the ideal of their 
religion, that is to say, absolute power. All 
that they can accomplish is to change their 
dictators. We see republics, (and since then 
the truth extends to the writer s own country,) 
which issue only in a tightening of their bonds. 
A new and strange punishment 1 South Ame 
rica lies under the shadow of a vast manchineel, 
which distils death upon it ; the roots are in 
another continent, and remain invisible." 



1 52 THE INQUISITION. 



CHAPTER V. 

THE INQUISITION IN PORTUGAL AND OOA. 

PORTUGAL would have afforded a noble exception 
to the mass of the more " Catholic states," if, 
whilst able during the reigns of Ferdinand and 
Isabella to offer an asylum to the persecuted 
Jews, she had always continued to maintain 
that tolerance. But it was not so. John nr., 
alarmed at the growing liberty of opinion which 
was at that time beginning to take the form of 
the Reformation, and resolving to restrict its 
exercise in his own dominions, invited pope 
Clement vn. to send an inquisitor-general, who 
should establish the holy office among his 
subjects. We cannot suppose that these w<-n> 
the first rigorous measures adopted in Portugal 
to prevent the spread of gospel truth, though 
the form in which persecution had previously 
exhibited itself is unknown. In 1589, however, 
the Inquisition was set up in Evora and Li>l,,n, 
and not long after in Coimbra ; and XaviYr, 
a man full of zeal, though much of it was of ;l 
false kind, wrote to the king from India, staling, 
that " the Jewish wickedness spread every day 



THE INQUISITION IN PORTUGAL AND GOA. 153 

more and more in the parts of the East Indies 
subject to Portugal, and therefore earnestly 
besought the said king, that to cure so great an 
evil he would take care to send the office of the 
Inquisition into those countries." Accordingly 
cardinal Henry, who was at that time inquisitor- 
general in Portugal, erected at the royal com 
mand the tribunal in Goa, the metropolitan 
city of the Indo-Portuguese dominions.* 

A despicable breach of promise on the part 
of the king was involved in some of these 
proceedings. In the year 1521, John had 
pledged his word to the new Christians of 
Portugal, (as the baptized Jews^were called,) 
that the Inquisition should not be established 
for twenty years, (repeating thus a covenant 
previously made with them by king Manuel to 
a similar effect;) and also that they should not 
be liable to be accused of heresy by the deposi 
tions of secret witnesses. Great opposition was 
therefore made by them to the establishment 
of the holy office, and with such effect that 
Paul HI., successor of Clement, not only granted 
them a pardon for the past, but exempted them 
from the most galling of the new instructions. 
In 1536, however, on the representation of the 
king that some new Christians had relapsed 
into Judaism, whilst others adopted the Lutheran 
heresies, the Inquisition, in a modified form, 
was again established, and Diego da Silva, 
bishop of Ceuta, was the first inquisitor- 
general. 

* Liiuborch, chap. xxv. 



154: THE INQUISITION. 

Cardinal Tabera, who was the sixth inquisitor- 
general of the Portuguese tribunals, exercised 
his office with great severity; and Llorente says 
respecting him, " The number of victims, calcu 
lated as it was for the time of Maurique, affords, 
for the seven years of cardinal Tabera s ministry, 
seven thousand seven hundred and twenty 
individuals condemned and punished : eight 
hundred and forty were burned in prison, four 
hundred and twenty in effigy ; the rest, in 
number five thousand four hundred and sixty, 
were subjected to different penances. I firmly 
believe that the number was much more 
considerable, but, faithful to my system of 
impartiality, 1 have stated the most moderate 
calculation." 1 Even if the reader should be 
of opinion that indulgence to an opponent may 
require some abatement of this calculation, the 
result will be fearful indeed. It is evident 
that the unjust severities practised by this 
tribunal were such as to excite the reclamations 
of pope Paul HI. himself, who, with only partial 
success, urged upon the inquisitors giv 
forbearance. 

With the early history of the InquUiti.-n in 
Portugal, the name of an Englishman is ., 
ciated, as having, under circumstances of a vrry 
peculiar character, fallen under its ban. 
John Gardiner, an Englishman, rand 

>n as a British merchant, but as a IV- 
tant righteously abstained from frequenting the 
lloman Catholic worship. However, on the 
* -Uorente s History of the Inquisition, din; 



THE INQUISITION IN PORTUGAL AND GOA. 155 

occasion of a marriage between the prince of 
Portugal and the infanta of Spain, he departed 
from this wise custom and went to church, 
where the superstitious observances which met 
his eye excited within him the greatest horror. 
He rashly resolved to obtain reformation or to 
sacrifice his own life. AVith this view he wound 
up and closed his business, and prepared to 
take the attitude of a witness for the truth. 
Accordingly, going to the cathedral, he snatched 
the host which the people were adoring, and 
trampled it in the dust. The consternation 
was excessive, and Gardiner s life was in immi 
nent peril. The king being present, inquired 
who had instigated him to such a proceeding. 
Gardiner declared that he had no accomplices, 
but acted according to his conscience alone. 
He was imprisoned, and an order was at the 
same time issued that all his countrymen then 
in Lisbon should undergo the same fate. The 
tortures of the Inquisition were applied to 
Gardiner a ball was alternately forced down 
and drawn up his throat, and one of his hands 
was amputated ; but nothing could cause him 
to denounce a deed in which he gloried, and he 
was condemned to die. A gibbet was accord 
ingly erected, and a fire placed beneath it. 
Gardiner was then hung from it over the 
flames, so as to be roasted in the most lingering 
manner, being sometimes lowered into the fire, 
and then raised up, so as to be fully seen by 
the people as he perished in his agony. But 
his courage was undaunted. In reply to the 



15C THE INQUISITION. 

exhortations of the priests who stood around 
him, that ho would renounce his heresies and 
pray to the Virgin, he replied with his dying 
breath, " When Christ ceases to be our Advocate 
then I will pray to the virgin Mary to become 
one." He began the Psalm in the Vulgate, 
" Judge me, 6 God ! and defend my cause 
against an ungodly nation." This was the 
motto of the Inquisition. His tormentors, in 
order to put a stop to his recitation, drew his 
roasted body up and down more quickly, till 
the rope suddenly breaking, he met his death 
in the flames. As our first really Protestant 
king, Edward vi., then sat upon the throne of 
Kngland, all his subjects in Lisbon were, in 
consequence of this event, regarded for some 
time with peculiar disfavour. 

If Rome has ever been celebrated for a 
faithful remembrance of its promises, it has not 
been where heretics have been concerned. The 
Portuguese history of the holy tribunal furnishes 
one among many illustrations of this significant 
fact. As the Jews of that country had con 
tributed a sum of no less than 250,000 to aid 
Sebastian in an assault on the Moors in Africa, 
pope Gregory in. promised (contrary to the 
advice of Philip 11. of Spain) that during ten 
years the Jews should be free from the fines 
of the Inquisition. Not more than three months 
had elapsed from the issuing of this edict, when 
the African expedition having disastrously 
fail. d, the same pope ascertained from the b.-t 
legal opinions that such a promise was a 



THE INQUISITION IN PORTUGAL AND GOA. 157 

one to have been made, and a dangerous one 
for the safety of the church to be observed. 

In 1G04, a bull, issued by pope Clement vur., 
promised to relieve the condition of those who 
were the victims of inquisitorial severity. But 
the hope it held out was probably a mockery 
and a cruelty, for the bull was apparently 
succeeded by a more stringent system than 
before. 

In the year 1082, we read of an auto at 
which eighty-two persons were sentenced to 
severe punishments; three were burned alive, 
and one was strangled before being burned. 
The offences were mainly Judaism and witch 
craft. Not long afterwards, the throne of pope 
Alexander vur. at Home was besieged by a 
deputation, entreating that he would show pity 
on the new Christians of Portugal, who were 
immured in the dungeons of the Inquisition, 
where some of them had lain for fourteen years, 
and none for less than seven. 

When, in the year 1672, some^ wafers were 
missing from the churches, suspicion was directed 
towards the Moors and Jews of Lisbon, and the 
torture was put into the most industrious action. 
Pitying their case, some noblemen of influence 
asked the king to end these barbarities, lie 
referred them to the court of Home. It might 
have been expected that a discovery soon 
afterwards made that the offender was a 
Roman Catholic, would have settled the whole 
affair by opening the prison doors, But the 
accused were still held in confinement because 



158 THE INQUISITION 1 . 

a quarrel had arisen between the court of Rome 
and the Inquisition, respecting a reform in the 
holy office, the king siding with the former. 
Dominican justice, when animated by revenge, 
does not disdain to war with the dead; for 
when the monarch soon after this breathed his 
last, the inquisitors led his widow and regent, 
Dona Luisa, to his grave, that she might 
witness the manner in which the church could 
insult the remains of her departed husband. 
Some peculiar barbarities appear to have at 
tended the mode in which the martyrs of the 
Inquisition suffered death at Lisbon. The 

following is the relation of Dr. Geddes: 

" The prisoners are no sooner in the hands 
of the civil magistrate than they are loaded 
with chains before the eyes of the Inquisition, 
and being carried first to the secular jail, are, 
within an hour or two, brought from thence 
before the lord chief justice, who, without 
knowing anything of their particular crimes, or 
of the evidence that was against them, asks 
them one by one in what religion they intend 
to die ? If they answer that they will die in 
the communion of the church of Rome, they 
are condemned by him to be carried forthwith 
to the place of execution, and there to be first, 
iglcd, and afterwards burned to ashes. I Jut 
if th -y say they will die in the Protestant, or 
in any faith that is contrary to the Roman, 

then sentenced by him to 1.. 
forthwith to the place of execution, and there 
burned alive. 



THE INQUISITION IN PORTUGAL AND GO A. 159 

" At the place of execution, which at Lisbon 
13 the Ribera, there are as many stakes set up 
as there are prisoners to be burned, with a good 
quantity of dry furze about them. The stakes 
of the professed, as the Inquisition call them, 
may be about four yards high, and have a 
small board, "whereon the prisoner is to be 
seated, within half a yard of the top. The 
negative and relapsed being first strangled and 
then burned, the professed go up a ladder 
betwixt the two Jesuits who have attended 
them all day, and when they are come even 
with the forementioned board, they turn about 
to the people, and the Jesuits spend a quarter 
of an hour in exhorting the professed to be 
reconciled to the church of Rome, which, if 
they refuse to be, the Jesuits come down, and 
the executioner ascends, and having turned the 
professed off the ladder upon the seat, and 
chained their bodies close to the stake, he leaves 
them, and the Jesuits go up to them a second 
time to renew their exhortation to them, and at 
parting tell them, that they leave them to the 
devil, who is standing at their elbow to receive 
their souls and carry them with him into the 
flames of hell-fire so soon as they are out of 
their bodies. Upon this a great shout is raised, 
and as soon as the Jesuits are off the ladder, 
the cry is, Let the dogs beards be made! 
which is done by thrusting flaming furzes, 
fastened to a long pole, against their faces. 

" And this inhumanity is commonly continued 
until their faces arc burned to a coal, and is 



ICO THE INQUISITION. 

always accompanied with such loud acclama 
tions of joy as are not to bo heard upon any 
other occasion ; a bull feast or a farce being 
dull entertainments to the using a profeasi-d 
heretic thus inhumanly. The profess* d .s 
beards having been thus made, or burned, as 
they call it in jollity, fire is set to the furze 
which are at the bottom of the stake, and abo\e 
which the professed are chained so high that 
the top of the flame seldom reaches them ; and 
if there happens to be a wind to which that 
place is much exposed, it seldom reaches 
higher than their knees ; so that though, if 
there be a calm, the professed are generally 
dead before half an hour has elapsed since tin- 
lighting of the furze, yet if the weather prove 
windy, they are not after that dead in an hour 
and a half or two hours, and so are really 
roasted and not burned to death. But though 
out of hell, there cannot possibly be a more 
lamentable spectacle than this, hearing the 
sufferers (so long as they were able to speak) 
crying out, Misericordia par amor Je DiotJ 
1 Mercy for the love of God ! yet it is beheld 
by people of both sexes and all ages with such 
transports of joy and satisfaction as are not on 
any other occasion to be met with." 

A letter, written to Dr. Gilbert liurm-t, 
bishop of Salisbury, by Mr. Wilcox, afterwanU 
bishop of Rochester, in 1706, corrobor;it< ^ 
the above account. The writer speaks of an 
auto da fe which he had just witnessed at Lisbon, 
where he was at that time an English chaplain, 



THE INQUISITION IN PORTUGAL AND GOA. 161 

at which five persons were condemned and two 
burned alive. " The woman was alive in the 
flames half an hour, and the man above an 
hour. The king and his brothers were seated 
at a window so near as to be addressed for a 
considerable time, in very moving terms, by 
the man as he was burning. But though the 
favour he begged was only a few more faggots, 
yet he was not able to obtain it."* 

The case of Elizabeth Vasconelles, which was 
attested before the same clergyman and the consul 
of Portugal, possesses considerable interest. She 
had gone to Madeira, and had been married to 
a physician of that island, never conforming, 
however, to the rites of the Romish church. 
Her husband had gone on a voyage to Brazil, 
and she, being taken ill, was visited by priests, 
who administered to her the sacrament, though 
without her knowledge, she being in a state of 
delirium. In consequence of her afterwards 
refusing to conform to the established ritual, 
she was sent a prisoner to the Lisbon Inqui 
sition. There she was kept in a narrow cell 
during nine months, and was told, that as she 
had conformed to the Romish church she must 
persist in it or burn. As she refused obedi 
ence, she was severely whipped with knotted 
cords, and some time after was cruelly cauter 
ized with red hot irons, and then sent back to 
her prison without any application for her 
wounds. A month after she was again severely 
whipped. As they found her fortitude un- 
Chandler s History of Persecution, p. 247. Note. 
F 



1G2 THE INQUISITION. 

shaken, the inquisitors told her " that it was 
the mercy of that tribunal which led them to 
endeavour to rescue her from the flames of 
hell; but if her resolution were to burn rather 
than to profess the Romish religion, they would 
give her a trial of it beforehand." Accord 
ingly, " her left foot was made bare, and an 
iron slipper, red hot, being immediately brought 
in, her foot was fastened into it, which con 
tinued on, burning her to the bone, till such 
time as by extremity of pain she fainted away, 
and the physician declaring her life in danger, 
they took it off, and ordered her again to her 
prison." 

She was subsequently again whipped, and was 
threatened with fresh tortures. Worn out by 
suffering, she at length consented to subscribe 
her name to a paper which was set before her. 
She accordingly signed she knew not what ; 
and after having been pillagedof all her pro 
perty, amounting to about 500, and obliged 
to take an oath of solemn secresy, she was 
turned into the streets to beg or starve. Such 
was the substance of the deposition made by 
this poor woman. Her further history does not 
appear to have been related. 

After ono of those revolutions by which 
the framework of society in Portugal has been 
frequently disturbed, the oflice of the InquiM- 
tion in Lisbon was destroyed. The following 
: iption of the appearance which the interior 
of the building presented, will be read with 
interest : 



THE INQUISITION IN PORTUGAL AND GOA. 163 

"On the 8th of October, 1821, the palace 
of the holy office was opened to the people. 
The number which crowded to see it for the 
first four days, rendered it extremely difficult, 
and even dangerous, to attempt an entrance. 
The edifice is extensive, and has the form of an 
oblong square, with a garden in the centre. It is 
three stories high, and has several vaulted gal 
leries, along which are situated a number of 
dungeons of six, seven, eight, and nine feet 
square. Those on the ground floor, and on the 
first story, having no windows, are deprived of 
both air and light when the door is shut. The 
dungeons of the next story have a kind of 
breathing hole, in the form of a chimney, 
through which the sky may be seen. Those 
apartments were allotted to prisoners who it 
was supposed might be set at liberty. In the 
vaulted wall of each dungeon there is a hole of 
about an inch in diameter, which communicates 
with a secret corridor, running along by each 
tier of dungeons. By this means the agents of 
the Inquisition could at any moment observe 
the conduct of the prisoners without being seen 
by them ; and when two persons were confined 
in the same dungeon, could hear their conversa 
tion. In these corridors were seats, so placed 
that a spy could observe what was passing in 
two dungeons by merely turning his eyes from 
right to left, in order to look into either of the 
holes between which he might be stationed. 
Human skulls, and other bones, have been 
found in several of the dungeons. On the walls 



164 THE INQUISITION. 

of these frightful holes are carved the names of 
some, of the unfortunate victims buried in them, 
accompanied with lines, or notches, indicating 
the number of days of their captivity. One 
name had beside it the date * 1809. The doors 
of certain dungeons, which had not been used 
for some years, still remained shut, but the 
people forced them open. In nearly all of them 
human bones were found ; and among these 
melancholy remains, in a dungeon, were frag 
ments of the garments, and the girdle of a 
monk. In some of these dungeons the chimney- 
shaped air-hole was walled up, which is a 
certain sign of the murder of the prisoner. In 
such cases the unfortunate victim was com 
pelled to go into the air-hole, the lower extre 
mity of which was immediately closed by 
masonry. Quicklime was afterwards thrown 
on him, which extinguished life and destroyed 
the body. In several of these dens of misery 
mattresses were found, some old, others almost 
new a circumstance which proves, whatever 
may be said to the contrary, that the Inquisi 
tion in these latter times was something more 
than a scarecrow. The ground on which the 
palace of the Inquisition stands was covered 
with private houses before 1775, whence it is 
plain that the victims who have suffered here 
must all have been sacrificed within less than 
sixty years. Besides the dungeons which the 
people already visited, there are subterraneous 
vaults which have not yet been opened. 1 
Keference has been already made to th 



THE INQUISITION IN PORTUGAL AND GOA. 165 

establishment of an inquisitorial office at Goa, 
in the East Indies. In the prosecution of their 
missions on the Malabar coast, the Romish 
priests, according to their custom with heathens, 
had frequent recourse to compulsory baptism. 
By such means, together with lavish favours 
conferred on those who became converts to 
papal Christianity, they speedily gathered 
around them a considerable body ; and as a 
protection against the heresies of the Nestorians, 
as well as against the secret Jews in their 
vicinity, the tribunal of the Inquisition was 
established at Goa. It followed the general rule 
of the holy office in other countries, dealing 
sometimes with Nestorians and heretics without, 
and sometimes with contumacious priests within. 
Much of our information relative to the tribunal 
at Goa is derived from a French physician, 
named Dellon, who Avas made painfully ac 
quainted with it in 1763. Residing at Damaun, 
a Portuguese town in the East Indies, he had 
spoken with considerable freedom respecting 
religious subjects in general, and the Inquisition 
in particular. lie was accordingly brought 
under suspicion and imprisoned, but when in 
troduced into the presence of the inquisitor, 
terrified at the probable consequence of his im 
prudence, he fell at his feet, offering to accuse 
himself and amend his fault. lie was told, 
however, that there was no haste, and that 
when the inquisitor was at leisure he would 
send for him. lie remained in prison from 
August, 1673, to January in the next year. 



ICG THE INQUISITION. 

lie was confined in a cell ten feet square en 
tirely alone, and denied the use of books or any 
amusement. After a considerable time a second 
audience was granted, when Dellon, with head, 
legs, and feet naked, was conducted ngain to 
the presence of the inquisitor. He detailed 
many conversations which he had held, but as 
he did not at the time remember that he had said 
anything about the Inquisition, he confessed 
nothing on that subject. He was asked in the 
usual manner, whether he had anything further 
to confess, and on being told " no," was solemnly 
adjured not to make concealments. 

On the 15th of February, his interview was 
begun by a similar adjuration. A multitude 
of questions were proposed to him relative to his 
baptism, his friends, etc. He was then ordered 
to repeat the Creed, Ave Maria, Command 
ments, etc.; and again conjured, "by the 
bowels of the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ," 
to make instant confession. As soon as the 
prisoner retired, some words he had spoken at 
Damaun relative to the holy office flashed on his 
mind. He demanded an audience, but it was 
a month before he obtained it. 

When brought once more before the inqui 
sitor, he detailed the conversation lie had 
remembered, and imagined that now his trials 
would be ended. He was frigidly told, liow- 
, that this was not what had 1 <<!. 

confession was not even taken down in 
wri ing. 

So great was Ddlon s despair at this juncture 



THE INQUISITION IN PORTUGAL AND GOA, 167 

that he endeavoured to commit suicide. He 
was therefore kept in tight manacles, which so 
aggravated his sufferings, that only the watch 
ful caution of his keepers preserved him from 
dashing out his brains on the stone floor. 

Eighteen months thus passed, and Dellon 
was once more brought before the inquisitorial 
tribunal. He was now formally accused, partly 
on his own confession, of having spoken dis 
respectfully of the holy office and of the sove 
reign pontiff, and was told that his property 
was confiscated to the crown, and that he was 
sentenced to be burned. The former charge 
Dellon admitted ; the latter he utterly denied. 
Three or four audiences followed, with the same 
result. At this time he heard every morning 
the cries of victims enduring the torture, which 
caused him to fear that he should undergo a 
similar process. In conclusion, Dellon was 
brought out at the auto da f<6, whence he was 
taken to Lisbon, where, after labouring for 
some time among convicts, he was released. 
At this auto, however, two persons were 
destroyed by fire. 

The narrative of Dr. Claudius Buchanan, 
though nearly thirty years later than that of 
Dellon, forms an appropriate sequel to it. As 
vice-provost of the College of Fort William, 
he possessed an opportunity of observing the 
state of the Inquisition at Goa. Referring 
to the year 1808, lie expresses his surprise 
that at that period the inquisitorial tribu 
nal at Goa should still exist : " That in the 



1C8 THE INQUISITION. 

present civilized state of Christian nations in 
Europe, an Inquisition should exist at all usuli-r 
their authority appeared strange; but that a 
papal tribunal of this character should exi>t 
under the implied toleration and countenance of 
the British government ; that Christians, being 
subjects of the British empire, and inhabiting 
the British territories, should be amenable to 
its power and jurisdiction, was a statement 
which seemed to be scarcely credible, but, if 
true, a fact which demanded the most public 
and solemn representation. ... I had commu 
nicated to colonel Adams and to the British 
resident my purpose of inquiring into the state 
of the Inquisition. These gentlemen informed 
me that I should not be able to accomplish my 
design without difficulty, since everything 
relating to the Inquisition was conducted in a 
very secret manner, the most respectable of the 
lay Portuguese themselves being ignorant of its 
proceedings; and that if the priests were to 
discover my object, their excessive jealousy and 
alarm would prevent their communicating with 
me, or satisfying my inquiries on any subjc -t. 
... He resolved, therefore, to visit Goa for 
himself, where a friend of his introduced him 
to Joseph a Dolorihus, the second inquisitor of 
the holy office, who invited Dr. Buchanan to 
take up his residence with him. . . . " ( >n thu 
second morning after my arrival, I was ^ 
prised by my host, the inquisitor, coming into 
my room, clothed in black roles from head to 
foot, instead of the usual dress of his order 



THE INQUISITION IN PORTUGAL AND GOA. 169 

\vhitc. He said he was going to sit on the tri 
bunal of the holy office. I presume, father, 
your august office does not occupy much of 
your time ? Yes, answered he, much. I sit 
on the tribunal three or four days every 
week. 1 

" I had thought for some days of putting 
Dellon s book into the inquisitor s hands ; for 
if I could get him to assent to the facts stated 
in that book I should be able to learn, by com 
parison, the exact state of the Inquisition at the 
present time. In the evening he came in, as 
usual, to pass an hour in my apartment. After 
some conversation I took the pen in my hand 
to write a few notes in my journal ; and, as if 
to amuse him while I was writing, I took up 
Dellon s book, which was lying with some 
others on the table, and handing it across to 
him, asked him whether he had ever seen it. 
It was in the French language, which he under 
stood well. Relation de 1 Inquisition de Goa, 
pronounced he, with a slow articulate voice. 
He had never seen it before, and began to rend 
with eagerness. He had not proceeded far 
before he betrayed evident symptoms of uneasi 
ness. He turned hastily to the middle of the 
book, and then to the end, and then ran over 
the table of contents at the beginning, as if to 
ascertain the full extent of the evil. He then 
composed himself to read, while I continued 
to write. He turned over the pages with 
rapidity, and when he came to a certain place 
he exclaimed, in the broad Italian accent, 
F 2 



170 THE INQUISITION. 

Mendachmi ! mendacium! I requested he would 
mark those passages which were untrue, and 
we should discuss them afterwards, for that I 
had other books on the subject. Other books ? 
said he ; and he looked with an inquiring eye 
on those on the table. He continued reading 
till it was time to retire to rest, and then 
begged to take the book with him. 

44 It was on this night that a circumstance 
happened which caused my first alarm at Goa. 
My servants slept every night at my chamber 
door, in the long gallery which is common to 
all the apartments, and not far distant from the 
servants of the convent. About midnight I was 
waked by loud shrieks and expressions of terror 
from some person in the gallery. In the first 
moment of surprise I concluded it must be the 
alguazils of the holy office seizing my servants 
to carry them to the Inquisition ; but on going 
out I saw my own servants standing at the 
door, and the person who had caused the alarm 
(a boy of about fourteen) at a little distance, 
surrounded by some of the priests, who had 
come out of their cells on hearing the noise. 
The boy said he had seen a spectre, and it was 
a considerable time before the agitations of his 
body and voice subsided. Next morning, at 
breakfast, the inquisitor apologized for the dis 
turbance, and said the boy s alarm proceeded 
from a * animi phantasmaj a phantom of the 
im, -filiation. 

44 After breakfast we resumed the subject ot 
the Inquisition. The inquisitor admitted that 



THE INQUISITION IN PORTUGAL AND GOA. 171 

Dellon s descriptions of the dungeons, of the 
torture, of the mode of trial, and of the autos 
da fa", were in general just ; but he sa.id the 
writer judged untruly of the motives of the 
inquisitors, and very uncharitably of the cha 
racter of the holy church ; and 1 admitted that, 
under the pressure of his peculiar suffering, 
this might possibly be the case. The inquisitor 
was now anxious to know to what extent 
Dellon s book had been circulated in Europe. 
I told him that Picart had published to the 
world extracts from it in his celebrated work 
called ^Religious Ceremonies, together with 
plates of the system of torture and burnings at 
the autos da fe. I added, that it was now 
generally believed in Europe that these enormi 
ties no longer existed, and that the Inquisition 
itself had been totally suppressed, but that I 
was concerned to find that this was not the 
case. He now began a grave narration, to 
show that the Inquisition had undergone a 
change in some respects, and that its terrors 
were mitigated. 

" The chief argument of the inquisitor to 
prove the melioration of the Inquisition was the 
superior humanity of the inquisitors. I re 
marked that I did not doubt the humanity of 
the existing officers, but what availed humanity 
in an inquisitor ? He must pronounce sentence 
according to the laws of the tribunal, which are 
notorious enough ; and a relapsed heretic must 
be burned in the flames, or confined for life in 
a dungeon, whether the inquisitor be humane 



172 THE INQUISITION. 

or not. ( But if, 1 said I, you would satisfy 
my mind completely on this subject, show me 
the Inquisition. Ho said it was not permitted 
to any person to see the Inquisition. I ob 
served that mine might be considered as a 
peculiar case ; that the character of the Inqui 
sition, and the expediency of its longer con 
tinuance, had been called in question ; that I 
had myself written on the civilization of India, 
and might possibly publish something more 
upon that subject ; and that it could not be 
expected that I should pass over the Inquisi 
tion without notice, knowing what I did of its 
proceedings ; at the same time I should not 
wish to state a single fact without his authority, 
or at least his admission of its truth. I added, 
that he himself had been pleased to communi 
cate very fully with me on the subject, and 
that in all our discussions we had both been 
actuated, I hoped, by a good purpose. The 
countenance of the inquisitor evidently altered 
on receiving this intimation, nor did it ever 
after wholly regain its wonted frankness and 
placidity. After some hesitation, however, ho 
said he would take me with him to the Inqui 
sition the next day. I was a good deal sur 
prised at this acquiescence of the inquisitor, 
but I did not know what was in his mind. 

" One morning after breakfast my host went 

to dress for the holy office, and soon returned 

in his inquisitorial robes. lie said he would 

..ilf an hour before the usual time f>r tin- 

impose of showing me the Inquisition. I 



THE INQUISITION IN PORTUGAL AND GOA. 173 

thought that his countenance was more severe 
than usual, and that his attendants were not so 
civil as before. The truth was, the midnight 
scene was still on my mind. The Inquisition 
i s about a quarter of a mile distant from 
the convent, and we proceeded thither in our 
manjeels. On our arrival at the place, the 
inquisitor said to me, as we were ascending the 
steps of the outer stair, that he hoped I should 
be satisfied with a transient view of the Inqui 
sition, and that I would retire whenever he 
should desire it. I took this as a good omen, 
and followed my conductor with tolerable 
confidence. 

" lie led me first to the great hall of the 
Inquisition. We were met at the door by a 
number of well-dressed persons, who I after 
wards understood were the familiars and atten 
dants of the holy office. They bowed very 
low to the inquisitor, and looked with surprise 
at me. The great hall is the place in which 
the prisoners are marshalled for the procession 
of the autos da fe. At the procession described 
by Dellon, in which he himself walked barefoot 
clothed with the painted garment, there were 
upwards of one hundred and fifty prisoners. 
I traversed this hall for some time with a slow 
step, reflecting on its former scenes, the inqui 
sitor walking by my side in silence. I thought 
of the fate of the multitude of my fellow crea 
tures who had passed through this place, con 
demned by a tribunal of their fellow sinners, 
their bodies devoted to the flames, and their 



174 THE INQUISITION. 

souls to perdition. And I could not help saying 
to him, Would not the holy church wish in her 
mercy to have those souls back again, that she 
might allow them a little further probation? 
The inquisitor answered nothing, but beckoned 
me to go with him to a door at one end of the 
hall. By this door he conducted me to some 
small rooms, and thence to the spacious apart 
ments of the chief inquisitor. Having surveyed 
these, he brought me back again to the great 
hall, and I thought he seemed now desirous 
that I should depart. Now, father, said I, 
4 lead me to the dungeons below ; I want to see 
the captives. No, said he, that cannot be. 
I now began to suspect that it had been in the 
mind of the inquisitor from the beginning to 
show me only a certain part of the Inquisition, 
in the hope of satisfying my inquiries in a 
general way. I urged him with earnestness, 
but he steadily resisted, and seemed to be 
offended or rather agitated by my importunity. 
I intimated to him plainly that the only way to 
do justice to his own assertions and arguments 
regarding the present state of the Inquisition 
was to show me the prisons and the captives. 
I should then describe only what I saw, but 
now the sulject was left in awful obscurity. 
Lead me down,* said I, to the inner building, 
and let mo pass through the two hundred 
dungeons, ten feet square, described by your 
former captives. Let me count the number of 
your present captives, and converge with tin in. 
I wan b to see if there be any bubjects of the 



THE INQUISITION IN PORTUGAL AND GOA. 175 

British government to whom we owe protection. 
I want to ask how long they have been here, 
how long it is since they beheld the light of the 
sun, and whether they ever expect to see it 
again. Show me the chamber of torture, and 
declare what modes of execution or of punish 
ment are now practised within the walls of the . 
Inquisition, in lieu of the public autos da fe. If, 
after all that has passed, father, you resist this 
reasonable request, I shall be justified in be 
lieving that you are afraid of exposing the real 
state of the Inquisition in India. To these 
observations the inquisitor made no reply, but 
seemed impatient that I should withdraw. 
My good father, said I, I am about to take 
my leave of you, and to thank you for your 
hospitable attentions, (it had been before under 
stood that I should take my final leave at the 
door of the Inquisition, after having seen the 
interior,) and I wish always to preserve on my 
mind a favourable sentiment of your kindness 
and candour. You cannot, you say, show me 
the captives and the dungeons, be pleased then 
merely to answer this question, for I shall 
believe your word. How many prisoners are 
there now below in the cells of the Inquisition? 
The inquisitor replied, That is a question 
which I cannot answer. On his pronouncing 
these words, he retired hastily towards the door, 
and wished me farewell. We shook hands with 
as much cordiality as we could at the moment 
assume, and both of us, I believe, were sorry 



1"6 THE INQUISITION. 

that our parting took place with a clouded 
countenance." 

The Inquisition at Goa perished, wiih the 
obsolete government of which it was an appen 
dage, in the year 1821. 



THE MODERN INQUISITION IN ITALY. 177 



CHAPTER VI. 

THE MODERN INQUISITION IN ITALY. 

IT remains for us now briefly to notice the 
progress of the modern tribunal in ITALY. 

After the persecutions of the Hussites, to 
which we have already made reference, the 
Italian Inquisition declined. Many efforts were 
made to revive its action, but without adequate 
success. When, in I486, the inquisitor-general 
condemned certain persons to be burned, the 
secular officers refused to fulfil the summons 
without first examining the process by which 
they had been sentenced. Though a show of 
generosity was made by the pope, Alexander vr., 
on the first expulsion of the Moors from Spain, 
many of them were incarcerated till they had 
qualified themselves, by confessing their heresies, 
to receive admission into the church. They 
then walked to St. Peter s in sambenitos, after 
which they received the papal benediction. 

Leo x. ordained that the publication of all 
books should be prohibited till their contents 
had received the approbation of the inquisitor 
of heretical pravity ; and the council of Trent 
subjected all works to the approbation of the 
holy office. When Luther had burned the bull 



178 THE INQUISITION. 

of Leo x., that pope ordered tho Inquisition 
to adopt the most vigorous measures against 
heretics, and enjoined the magistrates, without 
seeing the processes, to execute implicitly the 
behests of the church. Paul m., the same pope 
who summoned the council of Trent, passed a 
decree, reviving the holy office in a new form, 
to which he gave the name of the Congregation 
of the Holy Inquisition, and from which Spain 
was specifically excepted. This institution 
exercised a special control over all books, 
(what does Romanism fear so much as free 
literature ?) and inflicted penalties of various 
kinds, pecuniary and personal, for the breach 
of its regulations. Many eminent Christians, 
also, who had imbibed the doctrinc-s of the 
Reformation, suffered for their attachment to 
gospel truth. Among the rest was Aonio 
Paleario, who, on the accession of Pius v. to 
the pontificate, was accused, in consequence of 
his tract on " The Benefit of Christ s Death,"* 
of denying the doctrines of the church, and was 
condemned to be hung and his body burned, 
(A.D. 1570.) Another sufferer was Thomas 
Reynolds, an Englishman, who, after being 
racked, died in prison. 

Gregory XIH. gave permission to Jews to 
reside in his pontifical city, but compelled them 
to hear sermons directed against their peculiar 
tenets. Sixtus v. encouraged the proceedings 
of the Inquisition against those who professed 
magical arts ; and under his pontificate the 
Published by the Religious Tract S 



THE MODERN INQUISITION IN ITALY. 179 

vicars were required to publish the general 
edict of the Inquisition, to send monthly reports 
to the inquisitor-general, to observe the most 
profound secresy, answering no questions on 
the affairs of the holy office, and divulging no 
information, as well as refusing to answer all 
letters on behalf of prisoners of the Inquisition, 
without special permission from the pope. 

The influence of the holy office was not more 
fatal to the progress of religion in Italy than it 
was to that of science. Of this the well-known 
case of Galileo may be taken as a specimen. 
This celebrated man was teacher of mathematics 
at Florence, and had given a great impulse to 
the studies of natural philosophy and geography, 
but especially to that of astronomy. After his 
discovery of the telescope, by means of which 
he demonstrated the phases of the planet Venus, 
and made known the satellites of Jupiter and 
the spots on the sun, he adopted the system of 
Aristarchus, afterwards repeated by Copernicus, 
which taught, according to the now established 
Newtonian doctrine, that the earth revolves 
round the sun. This doctrine, as Galileo an 
nounced it, was regarded by the Jesuits and 
Dominicans as an insolent attempt to dispute 
the authority of the Scriptures.* They did 

* I)r Wiseman, in a recent lecture at Leeds, contends, with 
others, that the offence for which Galileo was prosecuted was 
not his scientific views, but his teaching them theologica ly. 
The distinction is neither very clear nor important. In either 
case the Romish church has opposed freedom of inquiry. 
But what literature has not the Inquisition proscribed ! 
Locke, Flcury, Racine, are but specimens of its prouiuil 
books. 



180 THE INQUISITION. 

not sec, or they would not, that the Bible has 
been mercifully adapted to man s views und 
language, and that the Divine Being, seeing he 
could not have been understood at all except 
by accommodating himself to man s weakness, 
had graciously employed the imperfect vehicle 
to which his creatures are most accustomed ; 
and, therefore, that no inference to the preju 
dice of revelation can be drawn from the iact 
that, " speaking after the manner of men," the 
Deity has employed current, rather than scien 
tific modes of expression. Galileo was accused 
before the Inquisition in the year 1G15, and was 
brought to iJome. Cardinal Bellarmine com 
manded him, on pain of imprisonment, to re 
nounce the dogma he had taught, and never to 
repeat it more. Galileo promised obedience, but 
the promise was rashly made, and this lover of 
science, impressed with the truth of his theory, 
could not remain silent. Yet he thought that, by 
employing caution in the promulgation of his 
doctrine, he might possibly escape censure. 
He therefore published a dialogue, as between 
a believer in the Ptolemaic system, an adherent 
of theCopernican doctrine, and a third individual 
in doubt, and obtained leave of the master of 
the sacred palace at Home to publish his tract. 
But when this treatise was issued, the con 
sternation was dreadful. Urban Mil. 
made to believe that the work contained n 
caricature of himself. Galileo was in terror 
and fell sick, but was compelled to appear at 
liome, where the holy oflice declared his books 



THE MODERN INQUISITION IN ITALY. 181 

heretical, and condemned him to penance. 
Under the influence of this compulsion, which 
proved too strong for his moral principle, 
Galileo, kneeling down on the pavement of the 
pope s palace, swore by the holy Gospels a 
renunciation of his errors. It is said, however, 
that on rising from his prostrate position he 
stamped with his foot, and muttered in an 
under tone, " Eppitr si muov<?(" But ^it does 
move though.") His punishment was in con 
sequence mitigated, and he was sent to a monas 
tery instead of a dungeon during the rest of his 
days. 

Among the modern instances of imprison 
ment by the Italian inquisition, the case of 
Catherine Evans and Sarah Cheevers, two 
Quakeresses, who were incarcerated in Malta 
till their skin was dried up like parchment and 
the hair fell from their heads in consequence of 
their close and loathsome confinement ; and that 
of Archibald Bower, a Scotchman, who repre 
sented himself as having suffered extreme 
torture, (though some details of his case were 
contradicted after his arrival in England,) 
deserve a passing reference. The Inquisition 
was very active in dispersing the lodges of 
freemasons or politicians which abounded 
towards the middle of the eighteenth century. 

In 1782, Ferdinand vi., king of the Two 
Sicilies, finally abolished the Inquisition in his 
dominions. 

Our next reference must be to thn occupation 
of Rome by the French in 1809. From the 



382 . 



THE INQUISITION. 



state of the prisons at this time the disuse of 
this branch of inquisitorial power was inferred, 
and it was concluded that the Inquisition had 
ceased to be a tribunal for the punishment of 
heresy and other oflVnces in general, and was 
confined simply to taking cocnizance of crimes 
against ecclesiastical law. But in 1825, under 
the pontificate of Leo xn., (Napoleon being 
quietly inte rred at St. Helena,) the inqui 
sitorial prisons rose once more, with the 
significant amendment of " being now well sup 
plied with light and air." The public attention 
was, however, little drawn to the Koman Inqui 
sition till the recent revolution in Italy re 
minded the world forcibly of its existence, 
though any prying eye might have seen ita 
modest building quietly crouching down at the 
foot of the Vatican and of St. Peter s at Kome. 
When the Constituent Assembly, in 1849 
determined that the holy office should be no 
more, it was resolved to appropriate the erec 
tion to the reception of a train of civic artillery, 
in consequence of which extensive alterations 
were made in the building, and some signifi 
cant discoveries were made. The prisons then 
contained only two occupants, a bishop and a 
nun the former had been imprisoned for twenty 
years in consequence of his having been or 
dained bishop by falsely personating another 
man. Of the offence which the nun had com 
mitted nothing was known. 

At the bottom of one of the vaults a discovery 
was made of a great number of human bones 



THE MODERN INQUISITION IN ITALY. 183 

without skulls, so mingled \vith lime and cor 
roded by its influence, that none of them could 
be moved without crumbling into dust. In the 
same cell several skulls were found not cor 
roded. The two classes of bones evidently bore 
relation to each other. An Italian refugee has 
given this explanation. The bodies were im 
mersed in lime which was slaked and reached 
up to their necks. They died of suffocation and 
in torment. After a time the head detached 
itself from the body and rolled away. "We 
must not, perhaps, assume this interpretation 
as certain, but the practice is in accordance 
with other ascertained practices. In another 
vault was found a quantity of earth of a 
peculiar character. It was analogous to that 
which exists in crowded churchyards, being 
composed of decayed tissue, with human 
hair of considerable length, more like that of 
women than of men. This disgusting mass 
was found at the bottom of a deep opening 
which intervened between the hall of trial 
and the well-furnished apartment of the chief 
inquisitor. A trap had once closed up this 
orifice, and the conclusion was, that numerous 
victims must have set their feet upon its 
treacherous surface possibly whilst listening 
to words of kind farewell from the inquisitor 
then sank to be seen no more. Besides this, 
there was discovered in one of the prisons a 
furnace, with the remains of a woman s dress. 
The very apprehension of its possible purpose 
convulses one with a shudder. On some 



194 TIIC INQUISITION. 

remnants of the ancient cells sentences were 
found written: " Too long have I been confined 
here at the caprice of calumniators without ad 
mission to the sacraments." Again, " Takij 
away oppression, O God." Again, " inori" 
surmounted by a death s head and cross 1> 
In one cell was found written in English, li J.s 
this the Christian faith ?" The examination 
of the papers which were discovered afforded 
proofs of an atrocious mass of degradation and 
licentiousness, though it is believed that some 
of the principal documents were burned imme 
diately after the pope s flight. 

An interesting question to the reader of these 
pages, as lie approaches the conclusion of this 
volume is 

Does the office of the so-called holy Inqui 
sition still exist ? 

We have already glanced at the arguments 
by which the continuance of such a tribunal as 
that of the Inquisition is defended and just ill- -d. 
The nature of this work demands that these 
shall be more explicitly examined, especially as, 
in some publications of recent times, they have 
been put forth broadly and unblushingly. 

It may be contended that heresy is a great 
crime, the prolific parent of perhaps all other 
crimes ; that inasmuch as faith is the spring of 
all action, a perverted faith is most dangerous, 
and that the interests, therefore, not of indi 
viduals alone, but of the whole community, re 
quire the suppression of unscriptural doctrines. 

No rightly judging Protestant denies the 



THE MODERN INQUISITION IN ITALV. 185 

criminality of error, especially the high crimi 
nality of religious error, nor that the conse 
quences of such errors to the community are 
in the highest degree disastrous. But as God 
himself has forborne to extirpate evil from the 
world by external and physical influences, and 
has rather commanded his people to do so 
by the influence of persuasion, of virtue, and 
of goodness, it is the height of arrogance to 
claim for the church of Home, or for the 
Inquisition which represents it, a power which 
in this probationary world the Almighty Being 
does not himself ext-rcise. It is evidently the 
intention of God that the tribunal to reward 
or punish men s actions shall not be set up 
in this state, but in another. Man has no 
scalpel fine enough for spiritual dissection, no 
wisdom adequate to the accuracy of the separa 
tion which the severance of truth from error 
demands. In rooting up the tares, he will " pull 
up the wheat also." In this case the practice 
of the Romish church exemplifies its own 
theory and condemns it. It has eradicated 
more good than evil. The testimonies given 
from many quarters to the morality of the 
judges themselves is most damaging. History, 
science, literature, religion, furnish superabun 
dant evidence of the intolerable mischief 
Ilomanism has done, and of the still greater 
mischief it would have done had a higher 
power permitted it to carry its OV.TI doctrines 
into full operation. 

It is contended, again, that the Inquisition 



186 THE INQUISITION. 

was the great parent of peace and order ; that 
"during the last three centuries there have 
been through the agency of the Inquisition 
more peace and more happiness in Spain than 
in the other countries of Europe." If quietness 
and order be the only test of moral excellence, 
then absolute slavery or actual death will best 
realize these conditions, and the argument 
should be pushed to the adoption of one or 
both. The Inquisition did give peace to Spain, 
but it was by crushing its energies, enerv.v 
its art, repressing its literature, annihilating its 
liberty. " You make a desert," said a heathen 
writer, " and call it peace." 

It may be contended, again, that the punish 
ments of the Inquisition, terrible as they were, 
were not worse than those of other tribunals 
that a woman was strangled and then burned 
before the debtor s door in Newgate for coining 
in 1789, and that torture was used in Scotland 
to extract evidence so late as 1C80. The ab 
surdity and enormity of this argument may be 
perceived by the reader in an instant. What ! 
has a religion which borrows the name of J< 
Christ, himself the pattern of mercy and lov 
a religion which is to teach and instruct th-- 
world no better prototype than the punMiin 
invented in the darkest ages, though in some 
cases lingering on beyond their day ? One 
might surely have expected it to protest in tin- 
name of Christ against such practices, rather 
than by its own authority to promote an-l 
instigate such barbarities. "\Vcll did our Lord 



THE MODERN INQUISITION IN ITALY. 187 

say to some of his disciples, whose momentary 
zeal might have prompted them to similar con 
clusions" Ye know not what manner of spirit 
ye are of: for the Son of man is not ^ come to 
destroy men s lives, but to save them." ^ 

That the Inquisition is still in action has 
been boldly denied, nor is it difficult for us 
to imagine that it has often been denied with 
perfect sincerity ; for so revolting is the recital 
of the atrocities of the holy office to every 
humane and reflecting mind, that we cannot 
conceive of a devout Koman Catholic who does 
not lean to the belief that such enormities must 
have passed away from his beloved church for 
ever. It may well be believed that scarcely 
any Roman Catholic layman, and very few 
even of the clergy themselves, are thoroughly 
versed in the history and numerous enact 
ments of their own church. Could we judge 
of them by the standard of their present 
knowledge, without raising the previous ques 
tion, how it happens that that knowledge is so 
inadequately small, we should be called to pity 
rather than to blame. But the important 
question returns upon us, If the Inquisition be 
a notion, now absolutely faded and obsolete- 
thrown aside amidst the black rubbish of the 
dark ages a system alien to the genius of 
Romanism as it is abhorrent from the sym 
pathies of Protestantism, how happens it that 
the edicts of later popes and councils have 
not as eagerly denounced its existence as in 
former days they unblushingly proclaimed it ? 



188 THE INQUISITION. 

How is it that the fostering wing, beneath 
which this cockatrice egg has been hatched, is 
boasted to be immutable and infallible ? Why, 
when the thing itself is gone, shivered into 
atoms, as it is said to be, by the universal 
feeling of an enlightened age, do its forms and 
its apparatus yet survive ? Why are Dominican 
friars still the keepers of the Inquisition, and 
the supreme pontiff yet its prefect ? And why 
do the kindling embers of ancient persecution 
still appear whenever there is a breath of 
despotism to fan them into a flame, to the 
consternation and grief of all lovers of an open 
Bible and a free religion ? 

But this is not all. Let those who contend 
for the obsoleteness of the holy office, mark 
only the declarations and avowals of Roman 
Catholics themselves. Of these the following 
may be taken as a specimen : 

" / have not the least doubt that a tribunal of 
this kind, modified according to time, place, and 
the characters of nations, would be most useful in 
every country. 1 * This is from a Roman Catholic 
publication, apparently of high authority. The 
sentiment might be confirmed by others of a 
similar character. There is some ground, in 
deed, for believing that the elements of nn 
inquisitorial tribunal already exist within tin- 
ish shores, lint to any careful observi r 
of the signs of the times, it will appear not an 

letters from a Russian Kcntleman nn tlio nanish Ii. P,I- 
Bition, 1>\ count Joso^li dr Mm-tre. i tl.. Rev. 

K. M. I). Uawson. Dolman, London, l 



THE MODERN INQUISITION IN ITALY. 189 

unwarrantable nor an ungrounded belief that 
papal ascendancy would immediately bring 
back, even upon this favoured land, all the 
tyranny, all the secret proceedings, perhaps 
all the horrors, of the terrible and accursed 
Inquisition ! Our conclusion is 

THAT THE INQUISITION IS IN ABEY 
ANCE, BUT NOT ANNIHILATED; THAT 
THE TRAIN IS LAID, BUT WAITS FOR 
THE HAND BOLD ENOUGH TO APPLY 
THE SPARK WHICH IS TO FIRE IT 1 

And the crisis for which it pauses, may God 
in his mercy grant that Protestant Christendom, 
may never see 1 

It remains for us in few words to conclude 
this volume, by some observations on the whole 
system we have attempted to describe. 

We cannot detach our recollections of the 
inquisitorial system from its association with 
the doctrines, discipline, and temper of Popery 
itself. Such an apparatus could only have 
existed in connexion with elements of grievous 
and even appalling error. The holy office is 
necessarily identified with a religion which 
keeps the mind in paralyzed subjection to 
priestly domination. Its power presupposes 
the interdiction of free inquiry respecting Scrip 
tural truth. It proceeds throughout upon the 
supposition that forms, ceremonial, and external 
profession, are the all in all of Christianity, 
instead of the enlightened convictions of the 
inmost heart. The Inquisition can only co 
exist, in energy, with absolute allegiance to one 



190 THE INQUISITION. 

temporal head, and with a subordination of all 
authority, temporal and spiritual, to himself as 
supreme. It undertakes a spiritual responsi 
bility from which any other system than Ro 
manism would shrink aghast, and presup; 
an infallibility which that church alone has 
been found to claim, and it realizes in the most 
striking manner the application to Romanism 
that passage of Scriptural truth : Which 
opposeth and exalteth itself above all that 
i, caned God or that is worshipped ; so that it 

?fl 8 ; r l /M G tem P Ie of God > ^wing 

itself that , it ; is God."* Can any religion which 

calls itself Protestant, whatever its errors, (and 

no variety is free,) be conceived of as syste 

matically associated with the series of evils of 

ucn the Inquisition is the type, and no 

accidental one :--Insolence ; Fraud ; Rapacity ; 

80 58 5 Indi S nit > ; Terror; Torture; 



How fearful is it to think of the Inqui 
having been to many minds the strongest 
exponent of religion they have ever known ! 
low many have lived and died, whose hi 
views of holiness goodness, power, an-! 
have been derived from this dangerous , 
blood-stained source? Llorento says that 
lorquemada was born to render religion 
eWOJ Sad truth! that to many the only 

ramification of Christianity they hare 
ever known was that from which their inmost 
hearts revolted ! 



* 2 ThcM. ii. 4. 



THE MODERN INQUISITION IN ITALY. 101 

And what must have been the domestic and 
social system which such an organization incul 
cated and encouraged ? Deriving their notions 
from the partiality, rigidity, and gloomy severity 
of such a demonstration, what must have been 
the husbands, parents, masters, rulers, sove 
reigns, who grew up beneath its influence? 
The case would be fearful if the Inquisition 
merely represented the state of society in its 
day. It is doubly fearful when it was the 
means of informing and creating it. 

Shall we regard the inquisitorial tribunal as 
a means of conversion to God ? The word con 
version is familiar even in such a connexion. 
But it means another thing from the melting 
and winning of the soul by the agencies of 
God s Spirit. Taking the word conversion in 
that sense, we cannot, without horror, entertain 
the thought of such a mockery as the con 
nexion involves ! 

But let us not bo unthankful. The value of 
the metal is seen by exposing it to the fire. 
God has, for wise reasons, determined that 
religion shall not be too easy. We shrink 
from the crucible, but we admire the gold. 
Rome and its Inquisition have been always 
engaged on bringing out the true church, by 
contraries ! In the Divine hand the spiritual 
enemy has been the real friend. The imple 
ment which has disfigured the foliage has 
increased the fruit. The strongest arguments 
against papal superstition are those of its own 
successes. Error dies in living ; truth lives in 
dying ! The mistakes of Romanism if they 



192 THE INQUISITION. 

be mistakes might cause its most bigoted fol 
lower to suspect his creed ; its deliberate inten 
tions if they be deliberate might cause the 
most resolute to deny it. 

Above all, let us not, as Protestants, over 
estimate our real strength. Ancestry, num 
bers, position, "worldly influence, "will not save 
us. We are more in danger from insidious 
than from persecuting Popery. The quiet tide 
which snps the shore gains more than the 
thundering waves which threaten to engulf it. 
Protestant security is in the prevalence of gospel 
truth. A crucified Saviour apprehended by 
faith ; a sanctifying Spirit sought by prayer ; 
a naturally corrupt heart brought into contact 
with the eternal and invisible ; the amend 
ment of the moral and not the merely senti 
mental nature ; the transfusion, through our 
whole life, of God s sacred and written word 
these are our bulwarks, and, like many of the 
strongest fortresses, are invincible, though un 
obtrusive. Let us beware of the religion which 
is mere external homage. And if we would be 
true to ourselves and our creed, let us set up 
a holy Inquisition within with Christ as our 
Head with his word as our law with con 
science for our great investigator with reso 
lute mortification of sin as our appropriate dis 
cipline ; but having all this system pervaded 
by a love for God, not by a mere terror of his 
frown. 



LOVDOjr : BiacxBUKK A*D BVBT, I-UIXTIRS, ROLBOBX BIIL. 



PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE 
CARDS OR SLIPS FROM THIS POCKET 

UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LIBRARY 



EX The inquisition in Spain, ar 

1715 other countries 

15 



; : 

llUl i? 



-~ il 



Ump