Skip to main content

Full text of "Theories of decision making : an annotated bibliography"

See other formats


LIBRARY 

OF  THE 

MASSACHUSETTS  INSTITUTE 

OF  TECHNOLOGY 


MASS.  INST.  TECH. 

.1111.     t)l977 
DEWEY  LIBRARY 


WORKING  PAPER 
ALFRED  P.  SLOAN  SCHOOL  OF  MANAGEMENT 


THEORIES  OF  DECISION  MAKING: 
AN  ANNOTATED  BIBLIOGRAPHY 

Deborah  Lines  Andersen 
David  F.  Andersen 


WP  943-77 


June  1977 


MASSACHUSETTS 

INSTITUTE  OF  TECHNOLOGY 

50  MEMORIAL  DRIVE 

CAMBRIDGE,  MASSACHUSETTS  02139 


THEORIES  OF  DECISION  MAKING: 
AN  ANNOTATED  BIBLIOGRAPHY 

Deborah  Lines  Andersen 
David  F.  Andersen 

WP  943-77  J""^  1^'^^ 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS 


INTRODUCTION  .  .  ... 

Background  1 

Structure  of  Literature  3 

Purpose  7 

Methodology  7 

Structure  of  the  Bibliography  10 


THE  BIBLIOGRAPHY 

I.  Rational  Decision  Making  (Economic  Man) 

I. A.  Normative  Rationality  11 

I.B.  Critiques  and  Extensions  of  Rationality  12 

I.e.  Mathematical  Models  of  the  Rational  Perspective 14 

I.C.I  The  "Systems"  Approach  14 

I.e. 2  Decision  Theory 14 

I.C.3  Simulation,  Mathematical  Programming,  and  M.I.S 15 

I.e. 4  Organizational  Process  and  Mathematical  Models  16 

II.  Organizational  Decision  Making 

II. A.  General  Works  on  the  Organizational  Perspective  17 

II. B.  Organizational  Critiques  of  and  Extensions  to  Rationality  18 

II. C.  Organizational  Aspects  of  Political  Decision  Making  20 

II. D.  Psychological-Organizational  Perspectives  21 

II. E.  Mathematical  Models  of  Organizational  Decision  Making  ...  22 

III.  Political  Decision  Making 

III. A.  General  Works  on  the  Political  Perspective  23 

III.B.  Organizational  Aspects  of  Political  Decision  Making  ....  25 

III.C.  Psychological  Aspects  of  Political  Decision  Making  25 

III.D,  Mathematical  Models  of  Political  Decision  Making  25 

IV.  Psychological  Decision  Making 

IV. A.  General  Works  on  the  Psychological  Perspective  26 

IV. B.  Psychological  Critiques  of  and  Extensions  to  Rationality.  27 

IV. C.  Psychological  Aspects  of  Political  Decision  Making  27 

IV. D.  Psychological-Organizational  Perspectives  29 

IV. E.  Mathematical  Models  of  Psychological  Decision  Making  ....  29 

V.  Cross  Perspective  Views 

V.A.  Readers  31 

V.B.  Overview  Articles,  Monographs  and  Texts  32 

V.C.  Analyses  Explicitly  Based  on  Multiple  Perspectives  34 


75'~705 


ow-wey 


INTRODUCTION 

BACKGROUND  AND  SCOPE 

Much  literature  has  been  written  on  the  subject  of  decision  making. 
At  various  times  bibliographers  have  sought  to  collect  this  information 
in  a  usable  form.  In  1958  Paul  Wasserman  and  Fred  S.  Silander  published 
an  annotated  bibliography  on  decision  making.  They  felt  that  "in  spite 
of  an  increasing  rate  of  publication  on  the  topic,  the  scientific  study 
of  decision-making  appears  to  be  at  an  early  stage  of  development.,,. 
The  literature's  sum  total  is  to  be  found  in  a  widely  scattered  group  of 
writings  which  cut  across  all  the  areas  of  social  and  scientific  inquiry," 

Their  bibliography  is  divided  into  eight  sections  which  deal  with  various 

2 
factors  in  decision  making  and  with  the  types  of  groups  who  make  decisions. 

In  1959  William  J,  Gore  and  Fred  S,  Silander  published  "A  Bibliographic 
Essay  on  Decision  Making,"   Gore  and  Silander  saw  decision  making  as  a 
fractured  and  conceptually  incomplete  body  of  literature,  "a  kind  of  con- 
ceptual wonderland  full  of  magnificently  intricate  and  promising  devices 
but  without  any  central  or  organizing  concept,"   They  set  about  to  apply 
an  organizing  principle  to  the  literature  of  decision  making,  dividing  it 
into  the  behavioristic  or  organismic  thread  and  the  rationalistic  thread. 
The  organismic  thread  was  subdivided  into  three  additional  areas.  Their 
self-appointed  task  was  to  give  structure  to  the  chaos,  since  "critical 

raul  Wasserman  and  Fred  S,  Silander.  Decision  Making;  An  Annotated 
Bibliography,  Cornell  University:  Graduate  School  of  Business  and  Public 
Administration,  1958,  p.  iv, 

2 
Note:  These  headings,  an  indication  of  the  structure  of  the  litera- 
ture at  the  time,  consist  of:  I,  The  decision-making  process--general  and 
theoretical  material,  II,  Values  and  ethical  considerations  in  decision- 
making, III,  Leadership  as  a  factor  in  decision -making,  IV.  Psychological 
factors  in  decision-making,  V.  Decision-making  in  small  groups,  VI.  Com- 
munity decision-making,  VII.  Communications  and  information  handling,  and 
VIII.  Mathematics  and  statistics  in  decision -making. 

nrfilliam  J.  Gore  and  Fred  S,  Silander,   "A  Bibliographic  Essay  on 
Decision  Making,"  Administrative  Science  Quarterly  h   (1959)ff97-121, 

^Ibid,,  p,  98, 


factors  such  as  topology  of  decisions,  models  of  various  decisional 
processes,  the  function  of  ideology,  and  the  basis  of  power  and  its  gen- 
eration receive  only  infrequent  and  inadequate  attention." 

In  1964  Paul  Wasserman  and  Fred  S.  Silander  updated  their  Decision 
Making:  An  Annotated  Bibliography,  producing  a  178  page  supplement  to 
the  original  work,  although  "since  many  more  citations  can  be  found  for 

the  period  1958  to  1963  than  for  the  earlier  period,  the  present  work 

2 
is  considerably  more  selective."    The  bibliography  uses  the  same  basic 

structure  as  the  original  volume,  although  "modifications  in  this 
topical  arrangement  from  the  earlier  work  reflect  the  differences  grow- 
ing out  of  the  more  recent  directions  of  research  and  subsequent  publi- 

3 
cation  in  the  field." 

Most  recently,  R.  Bandyopadhyay  has  published  an  article,  "information 

4 
for  Organizational  Decisionmaking--A  Literature  Review."    A  bibliographic 

essay,  the  article  divides  the  literature  of  organizational  decision  mak- 
ing into  three  areas:  the  classical  school,  the  management  science  school 
and  the  behavioral  science  school.   Underlining  what  those  before  him 


"'^Ibid.  ,  p.  121. 

2 
Paul  Wasserman  and  Fred  S.  Silander.   Decision-Making:  An  Annotated 

Bibliography,  Supplement,  1958-1963.   Cornell  University:  Graduate  School 

of  Business  and  Public  Administration,  1964,  p.  iii. 

3 

Ibid.   Note:  Comparison  with  the  earlier  headings  shows  that  there 

had  been  a  change  in  the  direction  of  the  literature  as  seen  by  Wasserman 
and  Silander.   Their  1964  headings  read  as  follows:  I.  Decision  making — 
general  and  theoretical  material,  II.  Leadership  as  a  factor  in  decision 
making.  III.  Behavioral  decision  theory,  IV.  Decision  making  in  small 
groups,  V.  Community  decision  making,  VI.  Communications  and  information 
handling,  VII.  Techniques  and  methods,  and  VIII.  Cases,  illustrations  and 
applications.   The  most  notable  changes  are  the  change  from  psychological 
factors  to  behavioral  theory  and  the  change  from  mathematics  and  statistics 
to  actual  cases  and  applications.   The  categories  appear  more  clear  cut 
and  reflect  the  increased  research  in  the  field. 

R.  Bandyopadhyay.  "Information  for  Organizational  Decisionmaking — 
A  Literature  Review."  IEEE  Transactions  on  Systems,  Man,  and  Cybernetics 
7  (January  1977)  pp.  1-15. 


*■*■ 


have  pointed  out,  the  author  states  in  his  first  paragraph  that  "litera- 
ture on  information  relevant  for  organizational  decision  making  is  scattered 
over  a  wide  variety  of  books  and  journals.  The  literature  is  not  only 
voluminous  but  is  also  extremely  varied,  making  comprehensive  review  a 
very  difficult  task."   Thus,  the  area  of  decision  making  still  seems 
wide  open  for  bibliographers  as  well  as  researchers  to  organize  and 
attempt  to  make  sense  of. 

STRUCTURE  OF  THE  LITERATURE 

Historically,  the  field  of  decision  making  has  gone  through  several 
stages.  These  stages  can  be  characterized  as  1)  preoccupation  with  the 
rational,  2)  critiques  and  extensions  of  the  rational  tradition,  3)  crea- 
tion of  fully  articulated  alternatives  to  the  rational  and,  finally,  4) 
a  multi -perspective  view  of  decision  making.  In  the  early  1950s  the 
decision  making  literature  was  preoccupied  with  rationality — either  in  the 
form  of  a  political  "single -actor"  rational  organization  or  as  a  rational 
economic  man.  This  view  saw  that  "decision  is  a  deliberate  act  of  selec- 
tion by  the  mind,  of  an  alternative  from  a  set  of  competing  alternatives 

in  the  hope,  expectation  or  belief  that  the  actions  envisioned  in  carrying 

2 
out  the  selected  alternative  will  accomplish  certain  goals,"   The  decision 

maker  was  seen  as  having  the  capability  of  looking  at  all  possible  choices 
and  outcomes,  weighing  each,  and  then  making  an  optimal  decision  based 
upon  these  deliberations. 

Critiques  and  extensions  of  the  rational  tradition  began  to  appear 
in  the  next  phase  of  decision  making  literature  as  scholars  realized  that 
neither  man  nor  his  organizations  were  capable  of  making  decisions  which 
took  into  account  all  possible  alternatives,  assessed  all  possible  out- 
comes, and  selected  the  optimal  among  such  alternatives.  Herbert  A.  Simon, 
for  example,  in  Models  of  Man:  Social  and  Rational,  collected  his  essays 
which  were  "concerned  with  laying  foundations  for  a  science  of  «an  that 

"^andyopadhyay,  og,  cit. ,  p.  1. 

2 
Peter  C.  Fishburn.  "Personalistic  Decision  Theory:  Exposition  and 

Critique"  in  Henry  S.  Brinkers,  ed.  Decision-Making :  Creativity,  Judge- 
ment and  Systems .  Columbus:  Ohio  State  University  Press,  1972,  p.  19. 


will  accommodate  comfortably  his  dual  nature  as  a  social  and  as  a 
rational  animal."   He  aimed  to  "set  forth  a  consistent  body  of  theory 


of  the  rational  and  nonrational  aspects  of  human  behavior  in  a  social 

2 
setting."   Although  not  totally  rejecting  the  rational  point  of  view, 

he  extended  his  ideas  to  include  man  as  a  social  as  well  as  a  rational 
being. 

In  the  next  stage  of  decision  making  literature,  there  was  the 
preliminary  articulation  of  full-fledged  alternative  views  to  the  classi- 
cal rational  tradition.  Some  of  the  extensions  of  rational  theory  had 
moved  so  far  away  from  the  original  concept  of  rationality  that  they 
could  no  longer  be  considered  modifications — they  were  entirely  new 
views.  Richard  Cyert  and  James  March,  for  example,  introduced  an 

organizational  theory  of  decision  making  in  A  Behavioral  Theory  of  the 

3 
Firm  that  was  to  replace  the  neo-classical  economic  theoiry  of  the  firm. 

Synder,  Bruck  and  Sapin  posited  an  alternative  political  science  theory 

of  international  decision  making  in  Foreign  Policy  Decision  Making ;  An 

Approach  to  the  Study  of  International  Politics.  The  rational  theory 

was  either  totally  put  aside  in  favor  of  these  other  views,  or  modified 

so  substantially  as  to  no  longer  be  a  purely  rational  view.  Several 

decidedly  non-rational  views  of  the  decision  making  process  grew  out  of 

the  literature  of  cognitive  and  perceptual  psychology. 

Herbert  A.  Simon.  Models  of  Man;  Social  and  Rational,  Mathematical 
Essays  on  Rational  Human  Behavior  in  a  Social  Setting.  New  York:  John 
Wiley  and  Sons,  Inc.,  19$7,  p.  vii. 

^Ibid. 

3 
Richard  M.  Cyert  and  James  G,  March.  A  Behavioral  Theory  of  the 

Firm.  Englewood  Cliffs,  N.J.:  Prentice-Hall,  Inc.,  1955. 

Richard  C.  Snyder,  H.W.  Bruck  and  Burton  Sapin,  eds.  Foreign 
Policy  Decision -Making ;  An  Approach  to  the  Study  of  International  Politics. 
New  York:  Free  Press  of  Glencoe,  1962. 

See:  Robert  Jervis.  Perception  and  Misperception  in  International 
Politics.  Princeton,  N.J.:  Princeton  University  Press,  197S^ 


As  these  alternate  views  of  the  decision  making  process  began  to 
emerge  several  attempts  were  made  to  integrate  them.  Finding  a  sense 
of  fragmentation  in  multiple  theories  of  decision  making,  scholars 
wished  to  reunite  the  field.  One  method  of  doing  just  this  was  to 
produce  a  reader  which  brought  together  articles  of  various  schools  of 
theory.   Another  method  was  to  create  a  review  article  which  would 

survey  the  field,  showing  the  various  theories  which  were  in  the  liter- 

2 
ature.   Finally,  other  writers  produced  monographs  which  attempted  to 

produce  an  integrated  whole.  However,  these  works  appeared  to  promote 

integration  more  by  a  unified  writing  style  emphasizing  some  points  of 

tangency  rather  than  by  a  genuine  unification  of  the  multiple  perspec- 

3 
tives. 

Finally,  in  1969  Graham  T,  Allison  articulated  a  multiple  perspec- 
tive approach  to  the  study  of  decision  making.  It  seemed  too  premature 
to  bring  all  the  ideas  together;  instead  each  of  the  competing  schools 
of  thought  should  be  more  thoroughly  examined  in  its  own  right.  More 
time  had  to  be  spent  looking  at  each  of  the  theories  and  their  assumptions. 
The  various  theories  needed  to  be  empirically  tested  on  the  same  case  to 
see  exactly  what  differences  were  ijmplied  by  each  of  the  separate  perspec- 
tives. He  proffered  the  idea  that  "different  analysts,  relying  predomi- 
nantly on  different  models,  produce  quite  different  explanations  which 
should  encourage  the  analyst's  self -consciousness  about  the  nets  he 
employs,"   In  other  words,  there  is  not  one  theory,  the  theory,  but 
decision  making  is  multi-dimensional  and  the  analyst  needs  multiple 
lenses,  or  points  of  view,  in  order  to  better  understand  the  many  complexly 
intertwined  dimensions  of  the  decision  making  process. 

See:  Marcus  Alexis  and  Charles  Z,  Wilson,  eds.  Organizational 
Decision  Making,  Englewood  Cliffs,  N.J,:  Prentice-Hall,  Inc,  196?. 

2 
See:  Martin  Shubik,   "Approaches  to  the  Study  of  Decision  Making 

Relevant  to  the  Firm,"  Journal  of  Business  3k   (April  1961 )«a01 -118, 

3 
See:  Ronald  J,  Ebert  and  Terence  R,  Mitchell,  Organizational 

Decision  Processes:  Concepts  and  Analysis,  New  York:  Crane,  Russak,  1975, 

Graham  T,  Allison,  "Conceptual  Models  and  the  Cuban  Missile  Crisis," 
Political  Science  Review  63  (September  1969)p.71$, 


In  1971  Allison  made  an  explicit  elaboration  of  the  multiple  perspec- 
tives idea  in  The  Essence  of  Decision;  Explaining  the  Cuban  Missile  Crisis. 
The  notion  of  explicit  and  contrasting  theories  or  models  of  decision 
making  began  to  receive  attention  in  several  fields  of  inquiry.  John  D. 

Steinbruner  in  The  Cybernetic  Theonr  q£  Decision  also  employed  and 

2 
elaborated  upon  this  multiple  perspective  idea. 

A  final  dimension  of  complexity  cutting  across  all  of  the  four  stages 
outlined  above  was  the  appearance  of  a  mushrooming  collection  of  techni- 
cal works  in  the  form  of  mathematical  game  theory,  statistical  decision 
theory  and  computer  based  decision  aids,  such  as  management  information 
systems,  and  mathematical  programming  and  simulation.  The  use  of  the 
computer  and  other  mathematical  techniques  was  applied  to  decision 
analyses  of  many  theoretical  persuasions  in  order  to  allow  more  explicit 
formulations  of  decision  making  models.  All  modera  schools  of  thought 
concerning  decision  making  have  at  least  one  mathematical  component. 
However,  it  is  safe  to  say  that  mathematical  formulations  tend  to  lean 
toward  the  normative  and  the  rational. 

The  existing  bibliographies  and  bibliographic  essays  on  decision 
making,  as  noted  above,  approach  many  facets  of  the  subject  from  small 
group  to  community  decision  making,  to  decision  making  within  organiza- 
tions. None  specifically  concentrates  on  the  explicit  articulation  of 
multiple  theories  or  models  of  decision  making  that  may  be  more  or  less 
valid  simultaneously.  This  bibliography  attempts  to  bring  together 
some  of  the  major  divergent  views  to  foster  cross-disciplinary  multiple 
views  of  decision  making.  That  is,  the  view  fostered  by  this  new  line 
of  research  is  that  decision  making  is  intrinsically  characterized  by 
multiple  perspectives. 


Graham  T.  Allison.  The  Essence  of  Decision:  Explaining  the  Cuban 
Missile  Crisis.  Boston:  Little,  Brown^and  Company,  1971. 

2 

John  D,  Steinbmner.  The  Cybernetic  Theory  of  Decision:  New  Dimen- 
sions of  Political  Analysis.  Princeton,  N.J.:  Princeton  University  Press, 
197177 


PURPOSE 

There  is  an  apparent  need  for  a  paper  structuring  the  field  of 
decision  making.   The  authors  of  this  particular  paper  have  taken  a 
look  at  a  segment  of  the  material  available  on  decision  making.   The 
bibliography  is  both  selective  and  restricted  to  the  material  available 
at  the  Dewey  Library  of  the  Massachusetts  Institute  of  Technology. 
Since  the  materials  here  are  specifically  those  found  within  M.I.T.'s 
Dewey  Library,  the  greatest  use  will  be  to  those  students  who  work  within 
the  Sloan  School.   It  is  clear  to  the  authors  that  this  paper  is  an 
initial  attempt  at  structuring  the  field  along  the  lines  of  simultaneous 
multiple  theories  and  that  research  in  the  field  will  be  a  continuing 
effort. 


METHODOLOGY 

The  initial  research  for  this  work  started  with  a  primary  reference 
search.   It  was  felt  by  the  authors  that  five  books  presently  structured 
the  field.    Other  possible  sources  were  discussed  and  it  was  decided 
that  the  search  would  be  restricted  to  Dewey  Library,  to  literature 
published  between  1957  and  1976  (one  year  before  Wasserman's  Supplement 
to  the  present)  and  to  generally  published  pieces  of  writing.   (Thus, 
working  papers  and  dissertations  are  not  included  here.) 


Note:  these  five  works  were:  Cyert  and  March.   A  Behavioral  Theory  of 
the  Firm.  1963;  Allison.   The  Essence  of  Decision.  1971;  Steinbruner.   The 
Cybernetic  Theory  of  Decision.  1974;  Braybrooke  and  Lindblom.   A  Strategy 
of  Decision:  Policy  Evaluation  as  a_  Social  Process.  1970;  and  Axelrod. 
Structure  of  Decision:  The  Cognitive  Maps  of  Political  Elites.  1976. 


8 


These  initial  five  works  and  their  bibliographies,  in  particular^ 
produced  not  only  a  list  of  pertinent  journal  articles  and  monographs  but 
also  a  list  of  those  journals  and  authors  who  have  concentrated  on 
various  views  of  decision  making.   The  next  step  in  the  search  was  to 
search  the  Dewey  card  catalogue  for  materials  pertinent  to  decision 
making  (although  there  is  no  specific  heading  for  "theories  of")  and 
works  by  these  authors  who  appeared  to  be  at  the  center  of  the  field. 
In  each  case,  as  a  citation  was  taken  down  and  as  an  annotation  for  the 
particular  book  or  article  made,  the  bibliography  of  each  piece  of  liter- 
ature was  searched  for  new  material.  After  considerable  searching  the 
same  citations  began  to  reappear  in  bibliographies,  indicating  that  some 
amoxmt  of  closxire  was  being  obtained  within  the  topic.  It  became  apparent 
that  many  authors  were  relying  upon  a  core  of  literature,  and  indeed 
much  of  it  was  related  to  that  original  list  of  authors. 

Journals  were  searched  in  several  ways.  There  were  some  that 

apparently  had  much  infonmation  on  decision  making,  considering  the 

frequency  with  which  their  articles  were  cited  elsewhere.  These  journals' 

indexes  were  searched,  1957  to  present,  to  gather  more  information. 

The  following  indexing  and  abstracting  services  were  also  consulted  to 

allow  for  articles  that  had  not  been  cited  elsewhere: 

Business  Periodicals  Index 

Social  S'cience  Citation  Index 

Sociological  Abstracts 

Sociology  Readers  Index  (Abrarason  and  Sofios;  2  vol\imes) 

Again,  as  with  the  monographs,  each  article's  bibliography  was  consulted 

2 
to  gather  up  additional  information. 

Finally,  several  members  of  the  M.I.T.  community  were  consulted  who 
are  involved  in  similar  research  (decision  making,  theories  and  models). 
They  were  able  to  provide  bibliographies  from  unpublished  working  papers 
and  from  their  own  knowledge  of  the  structure  and  literature  of  the  field. 

The  result  of  this  research  is  a  selected,  annotated  bibliography 
which  stnictures  the  field  of  decision  making  along  the  lines  of  various 

"T^ote:  The  authors  are  those  listed  on  page  7      and  Herbert  A. 
Simon  who  was  cited  often  in  the  literature.  The  journals  consisted  of: 
Administrative  Science  Quarterly;  Interfaces;  Policy  Sciences  and  Theory 
and  Decision. 

2 
All  references  given  in  the  following  bibliography  have  been  examined 

by  this  author. 


theories  which  have  arisen  concerning  how  Individuals,  groups,  and 
organizations  make  decisions.   In  many  instances  it  was  difficult  to 
tell  specifically  into  which  category  a  particular  article  or  book 
fit--as  has  been  noted,  the  literature  is  not    segmented  into  neatly 
defined  categories.   Although  this  bibliography  does  not  claim  to  be 
comprehensive,  it  is  an  attempt  at  structuring  decision  making  literature 
along  lines  that  have  not  been  used  before  but  that  have  been  implied 
if  not  suggested  by  major  researchers  in  the  field. 


10 


STRUCTURE  OF  THE  BIBLIOGRAPHY 

As  a  final  note,  the  literature  in  this  bibliography  is  organized 
by  discipline.   After  that  it  is  organized  by  the  overlap  between  disci- 
plines.  And  finally  it  is  organized  by  the  mathematical  models  of 
decision  making  since  mathematics  appears  to  cut  across  all  disciplines. 

The  literature  is  nonetheless  indistinct  in  that  it  does  overlap 
so  much  between  disciplines.   Therefore,  the  bibliography  attempts  to 
reflect  this  indistinct  nature  of  the  literature  by  doing  much  cross 
referencing.   Each  reference  has  been  housed  in  one  category  and  then 
cited  again  in  others  where  it  also  seems  to  belong.   These  secondary 
citations  have  been  abbreviated  to  cut  down  on  the  bulk  of  the  work, 
using  only  author(s) ,  an  abbreviated  title,  date,  and  a  note  as  to  the 
section  where  the  full  citation  and  annotation  can  be  found.   This 
author  felt  that  abbreviated  secondary  citations  were  preferable  to  com- 
plete reiterations  of  the  reference  for  each  source.   The  bibliography 
is  more  honest  in  that  the  actual  number  of  distinct  references  is  more 
apparent  when  second  and  subsequent  citings  are  abbreviated. 


There  are  91  annotations  here  but  138  citations  total;  thus  an 
overlap  of  47  cross  references  reflecting  the  multi  disciplinary  nature 
of  the  literature. 


11 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 


I.  RATIONAL  DECISION  MAKING  (ECONOMIC  MAN) 

I. A.  NORMATIVE  RATIONALITY 

Allison,  Graham  T.   The  Essence  of  Decision.   1971.   (See  Section  V.C.) 

Fishburn,  Peter  C.   "Personalistic  Decision  Theory:   Exposition  and  Critique" 
in  Brinkers,  Henry  S.,  ed.   Decision  Making:  Creativity  Judgement  and 
Systems.   Columbus:  Ohio  State  University  Press,  1972,  pp.  19-41. 
A  personalistic  decision  theory  is  defined  wherein  an  individual 
searches  out  all  available  alternatives,  assesses  individual  preferences 
and  expected  utilities,  and  only  then  arrives  at  a  decision. 

Friedrich,  Carl  J.,  ed.   Rational  Decision.   New  York:  Atherton  Press,  1964, 
228  pp. 

A  collection  of  articles  from  the  annual  meeting  (1962)  of  the  American 
Society  for  Political  and  Legal  Philosophy  is  presented.   The  volume 
"presents  the  student  of  philosophical  politics  with  the  vast  and 
inexhaustable  problem  of  rationality  in  its  relation  to  decision-making." 

Kassouf,  Sheen  T.   Normative  Decision  Making.   Englewood  Cliffs,  N.J.  : 
Prentice-Hall  Inc.,  1970,  88pp. 

"This  volume  is  aimed  at  providing  a  clear  and  concise  introduction 
to  modern  ways  of  conceptualizing  the  decision-making  process."  The 
work  is  not  intended  to  produce  specialists,  but  rather  to  acquaint 
the  reader  with  the  fundamental  principles  of  decision  making  under 
uncertainty. 

Kaufmann,  Arnold.   The  Science  of  Decision  Making :   An  Introduction  to 
Praxeology.   New  York:  McGraw-Hill  Book  Company,  1968,  256  pp. 
This  work  is  a  polemic  promoting  "praxeology"  or  the  science  of 
decisions  for  dealing  with  the  complexities  of  the  modern  age.   It 
forms  a  broad  and  popular  introduction  to  probability,  uncertain  games, 
sequential  decision  processes,  and  simulation — not  much  depth  is 
apparent  anywhere. 

Weber,  Max.   The  Theory  of  Social  and  Economic  Organizations .   New  York: 
The  Free  Press,  1964,  436  pp. 

In  a  penetrating  cross-cultural  analysis  of  forms  of  social  and 
economic  organization,  Weber  posits  rationality  as  a  normative 
keystone  to  modern  western  culture.   This  early  work  (the  cited 
work  is  a  translation  and  republication)  set  the  frame  for  much  of  the 
preoccupation  with  a  rational  and  normative  view  of  decision  making 


12 


that  was  to  occupy  students  of  both  economics  and  public  administration 
until  after  the  second  world  war.   Alternative  models  of  decision 
making  initially  emerged  as  critiques  of  normative  Weberian  rationality. 


I.B.  CRITIQUES  AND  EXTENSIONS  OF  RATIONALITY  (See  also  II. B.  Organizational 

Critiques  and  Extensions  of  Rationality  and  IV. B.  Psychological  Critiques 
of  and  Extensions  to  Rationality) 

Baumol,  William  J.  and  Quandt,  Richard  E.   "Rules  of  Thumb  and  Optimally 
Imperfect  Decisions."  American  Economic  Review  54  (March  1964)  pp. 
23-46. 

Baumol  and  Quandt  attempt  to  modify  the  normative  optimizing  model  of 
pure  rationality.   Borrowing  on  Simon's  notion  of  "satisficing"  rather 
than  optimizing,  they  argue  that  it  is  possible  to  evaluate  rules  of 
thumb  to  see  which  ones  produce  "optimally  imperfect  decisions."   This 
measure  of  optimal  imperfection  takes  into  account  the  "cost"  of 
gathering  more  information  to  make  a  more  globally  rational  choice. 
The  study  is  an  exercise  in  extending  a  rational  theory  of  decision  to 
include  cost  of  information  and  less-than-perf ect  rule  of  thumb  decision 
algorithms.   The  authors  conclude  that  "no  serious  recommendations  can 
be  offered  to  anyone  who  is  responsible  for  pricing  decisions  in 
practice. " 

Frledrich,  Carl  J.   Rational  Decision.   1964.   (See  Section  I. A.) 

Lindblom,  Charles  E.   "The  Handling  of  Norms  in  Policy  Analysis  "  in  Abramovitz, 
Moses  and  others.   The  Allocation  of  Economic  Resources.   Stanford: 
Stanford  University  Press,  1959,  244  pp. 

This  essay  is  addressed  to  the  question  of  how  do  economists  handle 
norms  or  the  evaluation  of  alternatives  in  their  policy  analyses.   Three 
more  specific  sub-questions  are  asked:   1)  How  can  non-commeasurable 
outcomes  be  weighed  in  some  fashion?   2)  How  can  values  be  made  operation- 
al enough  so  that  an  analyst  may  rank-order  policy  alternatives?  and 
3)  How  can  economists  arrive  at  agreement  on  value  weighting  and 
policy  ranking  schemes?   Utility  theory  is  examined  and  found  wanting. 
Behaviorally ,  Lindblom  argues  that   the  total  value  problem  is  consider- 
ably simplified  by  many  methods  such  as  eliminating  some  values  from 
consideration  or  only  attempting  to  order  a  small  set  of  incrementally 
different  alternatives.   The  process  of  breaking  apart  the  valuation 
process  or  "fragmentation"  is  suggested  to  be  the  mechanism  that 
economists  and  analysts  use  to  avoid  the  global  valuation  problem, 

Shubik,  Martin.   "Approaches  to  the  Study  of  Decision  Making  Relevant  to 
the  Firm."   1961.   (See  Section  V.B.) 

Simon,  Herbert  A.   "A  Behavioral  Model  of  Rational  Choice  "  in  Models  of  Man". 
Social  and  Rational:   Mathematical  Essays  on  Rational  Human  Behavior 


13 


in  a  Social  Setting.  New  York:  John  Wiley  and  Sons  Inc.,  1957. 
A  classic  article.   Simon  begins  with  an  elegant  mathematical  formulation 
of  the  globally  rational  decision  process.   This  global  process  is 
simplified  in  three  ways:   1)  Simplified  pay-off  functions.   2)  Partial 
ordering  of  pay-offs.   3)  Inclusion  of  "cost"  of  information  gathering. 
This  rigorous  modification  of  a  globally  rational  model  to  make  it  more 
in  line  with  human  behavior  is  a  precursor  to  Simon's  notion  of 
"satisf icing"  and  Cyert  and  March's  Behavioral  Theory  of  the  Firm. 
Simon's  penetrating  and  mathematical  probe  into  the  bases  of  the 
rational  theory  lays  the  foundation  for  much  of  the  behavioral  theories 
that  were  to  follow. 

Simon,  Herbert  A.   Models  of  Man.  1957.   (See  Section  V.A.) 

Simon,  Herbert  A.   "Theories  of  Decision  Making  in  Economics."  American 
Economic  Review  49  (June  1959)  pp.  253-283. 

Simon  presents  a  critique  of  the  classical  "economic  man."   In  slow 
moving  markets  characterized  by  low  complexity,  near-perfect  competition, 
and  information,  the  assumptions  implicit  in  the  value  maximizing 
static  economic  model  may  make  sense.   However,  in  fast-moving  complex 
markets,  a  more  detailed  elaboration  of  the  behavior  of  rational  man 
becomes  necessary.   Specifically,  Simon  examines  1)  The  applicability 
of  utility  functions.   2)  Whether  or  not  profit  maximization  is  an 
adequate  description  of  the  goals  of  a  firm.   3)  Does  "economic  man" 
account  fully  for  conflicts  of  interest,  and  4)  Has  the  value  maximizing 
theory  fully  explained  the  process  of  expectation  formation.   Simon 
concludes  that  theories  of  rational  man  must  become  more  behaviorally 
elaborated. 

Tannenbaum,  Robert.   "Managerial  Decision  Making  "  in  Porter,  Donald  E.  and 
Applewhite,  Phillip  B. ,  eds.   Studies  in  Organizational  Behavior 
and  Management .   Scranton,  Pa.:  International  Textbooks,  1964,  741pp. 
Tannenbaum  notes  that  analysts  can  not  afford  to  stop  at  the  rational 
theory  since  it  is  next  to  impossible  to  describe  the  mental  processes 
which  culminate  in  decisions.   The  necessity  for  making  decisions  arises 
out  of  the  fact  that  knowledge  of  relevant  existing  facts  is  inadequate 
and  that  the  future  is  uncertain — individuals  can  never  have  complete 
knowledge  of  all  factors  underlying  their  choices."   Individual 
behavior  is  intrinsically  non-rational. 

Wendt,  Dirk.   "Some  Criticism  of  Stochastic  Models  Generally  Used  in  Decision 
Making  Experiments."  Theory  and  Decision  6  (May  1975)  pp.  197-212. 
Wendt 's  criticism  of  such  models  is  based  upon  the  facts  that  they 
are:  1)  Not  appropriate  in  a  variety  of  situations.   2)  In  all  their 
consequences  too  complicated  to  be  used  by  human  subjects.   3)  Composed 
of  conditions  that  are  hard  to  test  and  it  is  doubtful  if  they  are  ever 
met  at  all,  and  4)  Too  strict  for  the   prediction  of  human  behavior.   He 
points  out  areas  where  more  research  is  needed. 


14 


I.e.  MATHEMATICAL  MODELS  OF  THE  RATIONAL  PERSPECTIVE 


I.C.I  The  "Systems"  Approach 

Benton,  John  B.   Managing  the  Organizational  Decision  Process.   Lexington,  Mass.: 
Lexington  Books,  1973,  271  pp. 

This  work  examines  "in  theory  and  practice  the  keys  to  a  successful  organ- 
izational experience  with  the  newer  techniques  of  planning,  analysis, 
and  decision  making."   Chapter  headings  include:  alternative  program  sets, 
program  planning,  preferred  courses  of  action,  and  systems  analysis. 

Brauers,  Wim  K.  Systems  Analysis,  Planning  and  Decision  Models :  With  Special 
Reference  to  National  Defense.  Amsterdam:  Elsevier  Scientific  Publishing 
Co. ,  1976,  167  pp. 

The  "cost-effectiveness  paradigm  for  decision-making  is  presented.   "The 
defense  problem  is  approached  as  a  system  to  which  systems  analysis  is 
applicable  and  systems  analysis  is  then  defined  as  a  tool  to  assist 
decision  makers  in  making  a  choice  by  systematically  examining  and  reexamining 
the  relevant  objectives  of  the  system  and  of  the  alternative  policies  or 
strategies  for  attaining  them." 

Hitch,  Charles  J.   Decision  Making  for  Defense.   Berkeley,  California:  University 
of  California  Press,  1965,  83  pp. 

A  series  of  four  lectures  on  a  systems  approach  to  decision  making  in  the  defense 
environment  is  presented.   The  work  provides  an  interesting  introduction 
to  the  field,  but  little  technical  detail  is  provided.   Topics  include: 
1)  Defense  posture  1789-1960.  2)  Planning-programming-budgeting.  3)  Cost 
effectiveness.   4)  Retrospect  and  prospect. 

Quade,  E.S.   Analysis  for  Military  Decision.   Chicago:  Rand  McNally  and  Company, 
1964,  382  pp. 

These  seventeen  essays  are  rewrites  of  lectures  given  at  RAND  in  1955  and 
1959  summarizing  the  state  of  the  art  of  "systems  analysis"  for  military 
planning.   The  volume  is  not  intended  to  teach  operations  research  material, 
but  rather  give  an  appreciation  for  the  technique's   strengths  and  limitations. 
The  collection  contains  case  studies  as  well  as  overviews  of  theory.   The 
technical  aspects  of  the  material  is  somewhat  dated. 


I.e. 2  Decision  Theory 

Archer,  Stephen  H.   "The  Structure  of  Management  Decision  Theory"  in  Rappaport , 
Alfred.   Information  for  Decision  Making:   Quantitative  and  Behavioral 
Dimensions.   Englewood-Clif f s  N.J. :  Prentice-Hall,  Inc.,  1970,  pp.  3-19. 
The  work  discusses  varying  degrees  of  information  and  how  managers  must 
deal  with  them.   Emphasis  is  laid  upon  the  notions  of  certainty,  risk, 
and  uncertainty.   Problem  areas  for  future  study  in  decision  theory  are  outlined, 


15 


Chernoff,  H.   "Rational  Selection  of  Decision  Function."  Econometrika  22 
(October  1964)  pp.  422-4A3. 

A  highly  normative  procedure  is  derived  for  deducing  how  a  rational 
analyst  would  properly  choose  a  decision  function.   Rationality  is 
defined  in  terms  of  nine  postulates. 

Fishburn,  Peter  C.   "Even  Chance  Lotteries  in  Social  Choice  Theory."  Theory 
and  Decision  3  (October  1972)  pp.  18-40. 
A lechnically  complex  discussion  of  alternatives  and  preference  in  theory 
of  social  choice  i«  p*«3<rvW. 

Kassouf,  Sheen  T.   Normative  Decision  Making.   1970.   (See  Section  I. A.) 

Pratt,  John  W.  ,  Raiffa,  Howard  and  Schlaifer,  Robert.   Introduction  to  Statistical 
Decision  Theory.   New  York:  McGraw-Hill  Book  Company,  1965. 
"This  book  is  a  Bayesian  introduction  to  mathematical  statistics,  i.e., 
an  introduction  to  the  mathematical  analysis  of  the  problems  which  arise 
when  the  consequence  of  action  depends  on  the  uncertain  'state  of  the  world' 
and  the  decision  maker  has  obtained  or  can  obtain  additional  information 
about  the  state  of  the  world  by  sampling  or  experimentation."  Calculus  is 
required  for  this  text. 

Raiffa,  Howard.   Decision  Analysis :   Introductory  Lectures  on  Choices  Under 

Uncertainty.   Reading,  Mass^  Addison-Wesley  Publishing  Co.,  1970,  309  pp. 
A  classic  textbook  on  mathematical  decision  making  under  uncertainty. 
Topics  include  utility  theory,  decision  trees,  judgemental  probabilities, 
risk  sharing,  and  group  decisions. 

Taylor,  Michael.   "The  Problem  of  Salience  in  the  Theory  of  Collective  Decision- 
Making."  Behavioral  Science  15  (September  1970)  pp.  415-430. 

A  model  is  developed  of  collective  decision  making  by  any  voting  body  choosing 
among  multi-attribute  or  multi-dimensional  alternatives.   Emphasis  is  upon 
the  problem  of  salience — preference  ordering  of  alternatives. 

White,  D.  J.  Fundamentals  of  Decision  Theory.   New  York:  North-Holland,  1976, 
387  pp. 

This  is  a  text  treating  the  logical-mathematical  aspects  of  decision 
for  second  and  third  year  mathematically  inclined  economics  students.   Included 
are  solutions  to  problems  and  references.   Topics  treated  include:  decision 
theory,  probabilities,  efficient  solutions,  game  theory,  group  decision 
making,  and  value  of  information. 


I.e. 3  Simulation,  Mathematical  Programming,  and  M.I.S. 

Berners-Lee,  CM.,  ed.   Models  for  Decision.   London:  The  English  Universities 
Press  Ltd.,  1965,  149  pp. 
This  reader  presents  a  range  of  mathematical  models  developed  to  support  decision 


16 


making  processes.   The  reader  consists  of  a  series  of  papers  presented 
at  a  conference  sponsored  by  the  U.K.  Automation  Council.   Four  classes 
of  models  are  presented — forecasting  of  demand,  planning  and  production, 
manpower  and  organizational  planning,  and  economic  planning.   This  volume 
is  more  concerned  with  mathematics  and  less  concerned  with  describing  real 
decision-making  processes  in  detail. 

Feigenbaum,  Edward  A.  and  Feldman,  Julian.     Computers  and  Thought.  1963. 
(See  Section  IV.  E.) 

Forrester,  Jay  W.  "Industrial  Dynamics — A  Major  Breakthrough  for  Decision  Makers, 
Harvard  Business  Review  36  (July-August  1958)  pp.  37-66. 
An  early  description  by  one  of  the  founders  of  the  field  of  how  computer 
modeling  could  revolutionize  managerial  decision-making.   Managers  will 
have  a  "better  ability  to  see  where  present  company  practices  will  lead" 
and  will  be  able  to  "redesign  [policy]    so  it  stands  a  better  chance  of 
success." 

Kaufmann,  Arnold.   The  Science  of  Decision  Making.   1968.   (See  Section  I. A.) 

Simon,  Herbert  A.   Models  of  Man.   1957.   (See  Section  V.A.) 

Sprague,  R.H.  and  Watson,  H.J.   "MIS  Concepts  (Decision  Models)."   Journal 
of  System  Management  26  (January  1975)  pp.  34-37. 

Here  is  an  article  on  management  information  systems  to  facilitate  decision 
making  within  an  organization.   It  discusses  problems  which  must  be 
overcome  before  models  can  be  used  within  an  organization — decision 
support  systems  and  the  like. 


I.e. 4  Organizational  Process  and  Mathematical  Models. 

Little,  John.   "Models  and  Managers:   The  Concept  of  a  Decision  Calculus." 
Management  Science  (April  1970)  pp.  B466-B485. 

Little  examines  the  relatively  poor  track  record  of  managment  science 
applications  to  date.   He  asserts  that  the  interface  between  modeler  and 
manager  is  being  neglected.   Useful  models  that  can  bridge  this  gap  must 
be  simple,  easy  to  control,  adaptive,  as  complete  as  possible,  and 
easy  to  communicate  with.   An  example  of  such  a  model,  drawn  from  marketing 
is  presented. 

Urban,  Glenn  L.   "Building  Models  for  Decision  Makers."   Interfaces  4  (May  1974) 
pp.  1-11. 

A  seven  stage  process  for  building  formal  models  to  support  decision  making 
is  presented:  1)  Formulation  of  priors.   2)  Entry.   3)  Problem  finding.   4)  Spec- 
ification of  model  development  criteria.   5)  Model  building.   6)  Estimation 
and  fitting.  7)  Tracking.   After  all  this  follows  continued  use.   The  formal 
modeler  must  remain  aware  of  these  various  processes  which  for  the  most 
part  are  grounded  in  principles  of  organizational  decision  making. 


17 


II.  ORGANIZATIONAL  DECISION  MAKING 


II. A.  GENERAL  WORKS  ON  THE  ORGANIZATIONAL  PERSPECTIVE 


Allan,  Harry  T.  "An  Empirical  Test  of  Choice  and  Decision  Postulates  in  the 
Cyert  and  March  Behavioral  Theory  of  the  Firm."  Administrative  Science 
Quarterly  11  (1966)  pp.  405-413. 

Allan  presents  an  empirical  corroboration  of  Cyert  and  March's  Behavioral 
Theory  of  the  Firm.   This  study,  based  upon  the  standard  operating 
procedures  surrounding  the  appeals  process  in  the  American  legal  system, 
suggests  that  the  theory  of  Cyert  and  March  may  be  more  broadly  applicable 
to  organizations  than  to  just  firms. 

Allison,  Graham  T.   The  Essence  of  Decision.   (See  Section  V.C.;  especially 
pay  attention  to  his  "Model  II") 

Carter, E.Eugene.   "The  Behavioral  Theory  of  the  Firm  and  Top  Level  Corporate 
Decisions."  Administrative  Science  Quarterly  16  (1971)  pp.  413-428. 
Top  level  corporate  planning  decisions  are  examined  in  the  framework 
of  Cyert  and  March's  Behavioral  Theory  of  the  Firm.   Based  upon  the 
study,  extensions  are  suggested  to  the  basic  organizational  theory  of 
Cyert  and  March. 

Cyert,  Richard  M.  and  March,  James  G.   A  Behavioral  Theory  of  the  Firm. 
1963.   (See  Section  II. E.) 

March, James  G.  and  Simon, Herbert  A.   Organizations .   New  York:  Wiley  and 
Sons,  Inc.,  1958,  262  pp. 

In  1958,  there  was  very  literature  put  together  in  a  formal  way  that 
might  be  called  a  theory  of  formal  organizations.  March  and  Simon 
set  out  to  fill  that  gap  by  creating  this  work — a  theoretical  treatise 
in  the  form  of  a  set  of  interlinked  propositions  on  organizations.   Topics 
treated  include  motivation,  conflict,  cognitive  limits  to  rationality,  and 
planning  and  innovation.   This  work  brought  together  much  of  the  scattered 
work  on  formal  organizations  and  opened  the  door  for  the  establishment 
of  a  separate  and  distinct  field  for  the  study  of  organizations. 

Meyer,  Marshall  W.   "The  Two  Authority  Structures  of  Bureaucratic  Organization, 
Administrative  Science  Quarterly, 13  (September  1968)  pp.  211-228. 
"Decision  making  authority  is  more  highly  centralized  as  the  number  of 
subunits  in  an  organization  increases;  but  as  the  number  of  levels  of 
supervision  grows,  there  is  greater  decentralization  and  at  the  same  time 
proliferation  of  rules  that  specify  criteria  to  guide  decisions." 

Mintzberg,  Henry,  Raisinghani,  Duru  and  Theoret,  Andre.  "The  Structure  of 
'Unstructured'  Decision  Processes."  Administrative  Science  Quarterly 
21  (June  1976)  pp.  246-275. 
Twenty-five  decisions  observed  by  graduate  students  are  placed  into  a 


18 


coherent  framework  in  an  attempt  to  articulate  a  structure  that  appears 
to  underlie  this  diverse  set  of  seemingly  unstructured  decisions.    Three 
principle-  phases  are  seen  as  composing  the  overall  process — the  identification, 
development,  and  selection  phases.   The  identification  phase  contains  the 
decision  recognition  and  diagnosis  stages.   Development  consists  of 
search  routines  and  design  routines.   Finally,  the  selection  phase  is 
composed  of  screening,  evaluation,  and  authorization  routines.   The  framework 
is  a  handy  conceptual  device  for  thinking  about  the  organizational 
processes  underlying  decision  making. 

Rubenstein,  Albert  H.  and  Haberstroh,  Chadwick  J.   Some  Theories  of  Organization. 
1966.   (See  Section  V.A.) 

Simon,  Herbert  A.   Administrative  Behavior;   A  Study  of  Decision  Making  Processes 
in  Administrative  Organizations,   New  York:  Macmillan,  1965  (2d  ed.),  259  pp. 
In  this  early  work,  Simon  lays  out,  albeit  in  a  broad  brush  and  less  precise 
fashion,  the  major  foundations  of  the  organizational  model  of  decision 
making  as  it  emerged  at  the  Carnegie  school  in  the  1950s  and  1960s.   This 
by  now  classic  approach  begins  with  an  examination  of  a  normatively  rational 
model  of  choice  (chapter  IV),  procedes  to  show  why  individual  human  choice 
can  not  be  objectively  rational  and  demonstrates  how  organizational  factors 
structure  the  decision-making  situation  for  individuals  and  hence  to  a 
large  degree  pre-determine  decision  outcomes. 

Simon,  Herbert  A.   "On  the  Concept  of  Organizational  Goal."  Admini s t r a t i ve 
Science  Quarterly  9  (June  1964)  pp.  1-22. 

Simon  grapples  with  the  elusive  concept  of  an  organizational  goal.   The 
following  definition  is  proposed;  a  goal  is  composed  of  constraints  or 
sets  of  constraints,  imposed  by  the  organizational  role,  that  have  only 
an  indirect  relation  with  the  personal  motives  of  the  individual  who 
fills  the  role  necessary  to  act  upon  such  goals.   Furthermore,  the 
organizational  decision  making  mechanism  is  a  loosely  coupled,  partially 
centralized  structure  in  which  different  sets  of  constraints  may  impinge 
on  decisions  at  different  organizational  locations. 

Simon,  Herbert  A.   The  Science  of  the  Artificial.   1969.   (See  Section  I.B.) 


II. B.  ORGANIZATIONAL  CRITIQUES  OF  AND  EXTENSIONS  TO  RATIONALITY 


Braybrooke,  David  and  Lindblom,  Charles  E.   A  Strategy  of  Decision.   1970. 
(See  Section  V.B.) 

Cyert,  Richard  M. ,  Dill,W.R.  and  March,  James  G.   "The  Role  of  Expectations 

in  Business  Decision  Making."  Administrative  Science  Quarterly  3  (1958) 
pp.  307-340. 

A  critique  is  presented  of  the  neo-classical  economic  theory  of  the  firm 
approach  to  decision  making.   The  neo-classical  view  posits  that  the 


19 


firm  is  a  profit  maximizer  such  that  resources  are  allocated  to  a  given 
purpose  until  expected  marginal  return  equals  expected  marginal  cost. 
The  theory  is  critiqued  for  four  reasons:   1)  The  classical  theory 
assumes  continuous  competition  among  alternatives.   2)  Search  activity 
is  viewed  as  simply  another  element  competing  for  resources.   3)  The 
neo-classical  theories  require  excessive  computational  abilities  on  the 
part  of  decision  makers.   4)  Expectations  are  exogenously  given.   Four 
case  studies,  forming  the  bulk  of  the  analysis,  corroborate   these 
criticisms. 

Cyert,  Richard  M. ,  Simon,  Herbert  A.  and  Trow,  Donald  B.   "Observation  of  a 

Business  Decision"  in  Rubenstein,  Albert  H.  and  Haberstroh,  Chadwick  J., 
eds.   Some  Theories  of  Organization.   Homewood,  111.:  Dorsey,  1960, 
492  pp. 

A  case  study  is  presented  wherein  a  medium  sized  manufacturing  firm  decides 
whether  or  not  to  acquire  electronic  data  processing  capabilities.   The 
authors  argue  that  the  open-ended  or  unprogrammed  decisions  differ 
substantially  from  more  well-defined  programmed  decisions.   The  classical 
theory  of  economic  decision-making  does  not  seem  particularly  valid  for 
unprogrammed  decisions.   Specifically,  rational  economic  theories  of 
choice  fail  to  account  for  1)  Search  for  alternative  and  information 
gathering  processes  that  to  a  large  degree  determintwhich  options  are 
considered,  or  2)  Communication  and  information  sharing  processes 
within  the  organization.   Preliminary  definition  of  an  alternative 
theory  of  decision  making  (to  be  elaborated  in  Behavioral  Theory  of  the 
Firm)  is  outlined. 

Lindblom,  Charles  E.   "The  Science  of 'Muddling  Through'."  Public  Administration 
Review  19  C  pring  1959)  pp.  79-88. 

This  essay  begins  with  a  critique  of  the  rational-comprehensive  (root)  view 
of  decision  making.   Instead  of  such  a  rational  view,  the  essay  argues 
that  in  an  empirical  sense  decisions  probably  consist  of  successive 
limited  comparisons  between  only  a  few  options  (branch  view) .   An 
argument  is  made  that  the  non-synoptic  decision  processes  may  do  quite 
well  toward  (better  than  anyone  might  think)  toward  arriving  at  "best" 
decisions  because  limited  comparisons  can  best  deal  with  complex  value 
and  interest  questions  that  seem  to  permeate  public  policy  design. 

March,  James  G.  and  Simon,  Herbert  A.   "The  Concept  of  Rationality"  in  Singer, 
Joel  D.,  ed.   Human  Behavior  and  International  Politics;  Contributions 
from  the  Social-Psychological  Sciences.   Chicago:  Rand  McNally,  1965,  466  pp. 
First  a  brief  sketch  of  the  classical  theory  of  rationality  is  laid  out. 
Then  some  difficulties  with  that  theory  are  presented — most  notably  that 
the  alternatives  and  consequences  considered  are  often  conditioned  by  social 
and  organizational  factors.   Finally  the  notions  of  routinized  problem  solving, 
problem-directed  search,  and  satisf icing  vs.  optimal  decisions  are  introduced. 

Simon,  Herbert  A.   Administrative  Behavior.  1965  (especially  chapter  4) .   (See 
Section  II. A.) 


20 


Simon,  Herbert  A.   "A  Behavioral  Model  of  Rational  Choice."   1957.   (See 
Section  I.B.) 

Wildavsky,  Aaron  and  Hammond,  Arthur.   "Comprehensive  Versus  Incremental 
Budgeting  in  the  Department  of  Agriculture."  Administrative  Science 
Quarterly  10  (December  1965)  pp.  321-346. 

This  is  a  thorough  and  interesting  case  study  of  the  first  application 
of  "zero  based"  budgeting  within  the  Department  of  Agriculture  in 
1962.   Ultimately,  most  personnel  resorted  to  incremental  evaluation 
of  alternatives  finding  global  comparisons  of  all  projects  impossible. 
However,  the  whole  exercise  seemed  useful  because  of  many  "unintended 
side-effects"  on  organizational  behavior.   Zero  based  budgeting  did 
not  work  as  intended  because  "comprehensive  budgeting  vastly  overrates 
man's  limited  ability  to  calculate  and  grossly  underestimates  the 
importance  of  political  and  technological  constraints."  Summary 
conclusions  concerning  how  to  best  manage  innovations  such  as  zero 
based  budgeting  are  presented. 


II, C.  ORGANIZATIONAL  ASPECTS  OF  POLITICAL  DECISION  MAKING 


Allison,  Graham  T.  and  Halperin,  Morton  H.   "Bureaucratic  Politics:   A 

Paradigm  and  Some  Policy  Implications."  1972.   (See  Section  III. A.) 

Braybrooke,  David  and  Lindblom,  Charles  E.   A  Strategy  of  Decision.   1970. 
(See  Section  V.B.) 

Crecine,  John  P.   "A  Computer  Simulation  for  Municipal  Budgeting."   1967. 
(See  Section  III.D.) 

Crecine,  John  P.   Governmental  Problem  Solving,   1969.   (See  Section  III.D.) 

Gerwin,  D.   "Towards  a  Theory  of  Public  Decision  Making."  Administrative 
Science  Quarterly  14  (March  1969)  pp.  33-46. 

This  study  is  an  empirical  examination  of  the  school  budget-setting 
process.   It  relies  heavily  on  the  budget-simulation  of  Crecine — in 
turn  derivative  from  Cyert  and  March's  Behavioral  Theory  of  the  Firm — 
for  much  of  its  theoretical  under  pinnlngs.   A  key  goal  of  the  budget- 
setting  organization  is  the  reduction  of  conflict.   Based  upon  the  case 
study,  a  list  of  seven  interesting  generalities  concerning  the  budget 
setting  process  is  derived, 

Lindblom,  Charles  E,   The  Intelligence  of  Democracy:   Decision  Making 

Through  Mutual  Adjustment.   New  York:  The  Free  Press,  1965,  352  pp. 
The  central  theme  within  this  work  that  caps  much  of  Lindblom' s  earlier 
writing  is  the  notion  of  mutual  adjustment.   Simply  put,  mutual  adjustment 
means  that  "people  can  coordinate  with  each  other  without  anyone's 
coordinating  them,  without  a  dominant  central  purpose."  The  notion  of 
mutual  adjustment  is  the  backbone  of  an  economy  of  markets  and  also  forms 
the  basis  for  the  evolution  of  common  case  law.   Lindblom  argues  that 
public  policy  also  results  from  mutual  accommodation  between  partisan 


21 


actors.   The  argument  is  made  that  mutual  accommodation,  rather  than 
"clogging  up"  the  works  of  a  centralized  policy  process,  is  perhaps 
one  of  the  dominant  forces  leading  to  workable  policy  formation.   Con- 
siderable attention  is  given  to  a  comparison  of  central  coordination 
and  mutual  accomiwodation  as  policy  processes. 

Lindblom,  Charles  E.   "The  Science  of  Muddling  Through."   1959.   (See  Section  II. B.) 

Pettigrew,  Andrew  M.   The  Politics  of  Organizational  Decision  Theory. 
London:  Tavistock,  1973,  302  pp. 

The  second  chapter  of  this  volume  focuses  on  "Decision  Making  as  a 
Political  Process".   Subheadings  under  this  discussion  include, 
the  organization  as  a  political  system,  power  and  organizational  decision 
making,  and  theoretical  bearings.  The  overall  thrust  of  the  essay  argues 
that  "within  decision  making  processes,  power  strategies  are  employed 
by  the  various  interested  parties  through  their  demands...  The  final 
decision  outcome  will  evolve  out  of  the  processes  of  power  mobilization 
attempted  by  each  party  in  support  of  its  demands." 

Schick,  A.   "A  Death  in  the  Bureaucracy:   The  Demise  of  Federal  PPB."  Public 
Axlministration  Review  33  (March-April  1973)  pp.  146-156. 

This  is  a  recount  of  the  political  story  surrounding  the  death  of  program 
planning  and  budgeting  in  the  federal  government  in  1971.   The  PPB 
advocates  failed  to  win  a  way  into  the  routine  budgeting  procedures  of  the 
federal  government  because  its  advocates  were  not  sensitive  to  the  established 
political  and  organizational  routines--another  blow  is  struck  against 
rationality  in  favor  of  incrementalism.   Political  and  organizational 
factors  are  cited  as  the  cause  of  the  death  of  PPB. 

Steinbruner,  John  D.   The  Cybernetic  Theory  of  the  Firm.   1974.   (See  Section  V.C.) 

Ugalde,  Antonio.   "A  Decision  Model  for  Study  of  Public  Bureaucracies."  Policy 
Sciences  4  (  ^73  )  pp.  75-84. 

The  "series  of  decision"  concept  is  defined.   Thatris,  a  decision  is 
really  a  string  of  decisions — usually  of  two  types — programming  and 
implementation  decisions.   A  case  study  from  the  health  ministry  of  Colombia 
Is  presented. 

Wildavsky,  Aaron  and  Hammond  Arthur.   "Comprehensive  Versus  Incremental 

Budgeting  in  the  Department  of  Agriculture."   1965.   (See  Section  II. B.) 

Wohlstetter,  Roberta,   Pearl  Harbor:   Warning  and  Decision.   Stanford,  Calif.: 
Stanford  University  Press,  1962,  426  pp. 

This  is  a  detailed  empirical  analysis  of  the  communication,  warning,  and 
other  organizational  policy  systems  that  left  the  United  States  totally 
surprised  after  the  Pearl  Harbor  attack. 


II. D.  PSYCHOLOGICAL-ORGANIZATIONAL  PERSPECTIVE   (See  Section  IV. D.  Psychological- 
Organizational  Perspective) 


22 


II. E.  MATHEMATICAL  MODELS  OF  ORGANIZATIONAL  DECISION  MAKING 

Allan,  Harry  T.   "An  Empirical  Test  of  Choice  and  Decision  Postulates  in 

the  Cyert  and  March  Behavioral  Theory  of  the  Firm."  1966.   (See  Section  II. A.) 

Benton,  John.   Managing  the  Organizational  Decision  Process.   1973.   (See 
Section  I.C,  portion  on  "the  systems  approach".) 

Cyert,  Richard  M.  and  March,  James  G.   A  Behavioral  Theory  of  the  Firm. 
Englewood  Cliffs,  N.J.:  Printice-Hall,  Inc.,  1963,  332  pp. 
This  seminal  work  presents  an  alternative  to  the  neo-classical  economic 
theory  of  the  firm.   It  pulls  together  many  of  the  critiques  of  rational 
decision  making  and  insights  into  organizational  processes  that  had  been 
generated  in  the  late  1950s  and  early  1960s  at  the  Carnegie  School  of 
Industrial  Administration.   In  this  work,  a  computer  simulation  model  of 
the  processes  underlying  organizational  choice  is  constructed.   Organizations 
are  seen  as  consisting  of  multiple  subunits  each  of  which  pursues  a 
parochial  set  of  goals  and  interests.   Each  subunit  does  not  strive  for 
optimal  strategies.  Instead  it  seeks  to  attain  satisfactory  strategies 
that  meet  the  constraints  imposed  by  the  environment.   The  theory  is 
empirically  verified  by  a  computer  simulation  of  retailing  in  a  large 
chain  store. 

Cyert,  Richard  M.,  March,  James  G.  and  Feigenbaum,  Edward  A.   "Models  in  a 

Behavioral  Theory  of  the  Firm."  Behavioral  Science.  4  (1959)  pp.  81-95. 
This  article  is  a  precursor  to  the  more  general  Behavioral  Theory  of  the 
Firm.   It  lays  out  a  computer  simulation  of  a  duopoly  market  based  upon 
a  behavioral  theory  of  decision  making.   Model  output  is  validated  against 
actual  industry  data.   This  is  an  early  landmark  in  the  organizational 
school  of  decision  making.   It  plugs  a  hole  (that  is  duopoly  theory) 
that  had  existed  in  the  more  rational  economic  theory  of  the  firm. 

Forrester,  Jay  W.   "Industrial  Dynamics — A  Major  Breakthrough  for  Decision 
Makers."   1958.   (See  Section  I.C.) 

Little,  John.   "Models  and  Managers:   The  Concept  of  a  Decision  Calculus." 

(See  Section  I.C,  portion  on  organizational  processes  and  mathematical 
models) . 

Simon,  Herbert  A.  Models  of  Man.   1957.   (See  Section  V.A.) 

Urban,  Glenn L,   "Building  Models  for  Decision  Makers."   1974.  (See  Section 
I.e.,  portion  on  organizational  processes  and  mathematical  models.) 


23 


III.  POLITICAL  DECISION  MAKING 

III. A.  GENERAL  WORKS  ON  THE  POLITICAL  PERSPECTIVE 

Allison,  Graham  T.   The  Essence  of  Decision.   1971.   (See  Section  V.C.) 

Allison,  Graham  T.  and  Halperin,  Morton  H.   "Bureaucratic  Politics: 
A  Paradigm  and  Some  Policy  Implications."  World  Politics  24 
(Supplement  1972)  pp.  40-79. 

This  article  elaborates  Allison's  Bureaucratic  Politics  model  to 
include  bureaucracies  as  actors  in  the  political  "game."  This  model 
represents  a  blending  and  enrichment  of  Allison's  MODEL  II  (organi- 
zational) and  MODEL  III  (bureaucratic  politics).   The  result  is  a 
rich  theory  of  international  relations.   Numerous  examples  are  drawn 
from  recent  U.S.  defense  cases.   Specific  prescription  in  the  form 
of  precepts  is  given  for  U.S.  policy  planners. 

Frankel,  Joseph.   The  Making  of  Foreign  Policy;  An  Analysis  of  Decision 
Making .   London:  Oxford  University  Press,  1963,  231  pp. 
This  is  a  theoretical  treatise  outlining  foreign  policy  making  as  a 
process  of  decision  makings   The  author  contrasts  this  "theoretical" 
approach  to  a  more  historical  or  descriptive  approach.   Separate 
topics  impacting  upon  the  decision  making  process  such  as  international 
environment,  domestic  environment,  information,  values,  the  organi- 
zation of  values,  and  choice  are  treated  in  more  detail. 

Gore,  William  J.   Administrative  Decision  Making;  A  Heuristic  Model. 
New  York;  John  Wiley  and  Sons,  Inc.,  1964,  191  pp. 
Gore  begins  by  noting  the  importance  of  decision  making  for  under- 
standing organizational  output.   He  argues  that  the  available  images 
of  "rational  systems"  are  inadequate  explanations  of  real  decision 
processes.   He  procee4s  to  erect  an  alternative  model  of  decision 
making  that  evokes  an  organismic  image  of  an  organization  caught  in 
a  never  ending  attempt  to  reach  equillibrium  with  its  operating 
environment.   The  metaphor  of  "tension  web"  is  used  to  describe 
a  prime  motivator  of  organizational  actions. 

Lindblom,  Charles  E.   The  Policy-Making  Process.   Englewood  Cliffs,  N.J.: 
Prentice-Hall,  Inc.,  1968,  122  pp. 

Here  Lindblom  explores  the  fundamental  question  of  what  is  the 
"underlying  process  by  which  policy  is  made?"  He  views  policy  making 
as  an  extremely  complex  and  messy  political  bartering  process.   The 
role  of  analysis  in  the  policy  process  is  brought  into  a  severe 
questioning  light.   This  is  an  interesting  exploratory  essay  that 
appears  to  open  up  many  more  questions  than  it  answers. 

Rosenau,  James  N.   "The  Premises  and  Promises  of  Decision-Making  Analysis" 
in  Charlesworth,  James  C,  ed.   Contemporary  Political  Analysis. 
New  York:  The  Free  Press,  1967,  pp.  189-211. 


24 

Rosenau  traces  the  history  of  the  introduction  of  "decision  making" 
as  a  primary  organizing  concept  in  the  political  science  literature. 
Beginning  with  Snyder's  work  in  1954,  he  traces  a  host  of  empirical 
studies  that  borrow  from  the  decision  making  concepts  but  do  not 
explicitly  use  specific  properties  of  Snyder.   He  concludes  that 
the  decision  making  approach  as  originally  formulated  is  conceptually 
rich  but  lacking  in  a  detailed  field  of  empirically  testable  hypo- 
theses. 

Snyder,  Richard  C,  Bruck,  H.W.  and  Sapin,  Burton,  eds.   Foreign  Policy 

Decision-Making:  An  Approach  to  the  Study  of  International  Politics. 
New  York:  The  Free  Press  at  Glencoe,  1962,  274  pp. 
This  volume  is  a  reprint  and  expansion  of  the  author's  earlier 
monograph,  Decision->faking  as  an  Approach  to  the  Study  of  International 
Politics.   The  original  work  proposes  that  the  fields  of  psychology 
(individual  cognitive  and  personality  factors)  and  sociology  (organi- 
zational factors)  be  applied  to  the  study  of  international  politics. 
The  approach  was  novel  and  seminal  in  its  generation  of  insight. 
However^  the  work  suffers  because  many  of  the  frames  and  categories 
presented  have  not  been  fully  integrated »   This  volume  also  presents 
criticisms  of  and  further  empirical  work  based  upon  the  earlier 
monograph. 

Snyder,  Richard  C.  and  Paige,  Glenn  D.   "The  United  States  Decision  to 

Resist  Aggression  in  Korea:  The  Application  of  an  Analytical  Scheme," 
Administrative  Science  Quarterly  3  (December  1968)  pp.  341-378. 
A  case  study  of  the  U.S„  decision  to  resist  aggression  in  Korea  is 
presented.   This  empirical  study  is  based  upon  an  amalgamated  theory 
of  decision  making.   The  essential  theme  emphasizes  the  interplay 
between  organizational  and  individual  "intellectual"  factors.   The 
behavior  of  foreign  policy  makers  is  controlled  by  four  sets  of 
factors:  1)  organizational-individual  factors,  2)  internal  (domestic) 
settings,  3)  external  setting  and  4)  properties  of  the  individual 
situation  under  question.   The  study  concludes  that  the  U.S.  did 
decide  to  resist  Korean  aggression  with  military  force. 

Sorensen,  Theodore  C.   Decision-Making  in  the  White  House:  The  Olive 

Branch  or  the  Arrows.   New  York:  Columbia  University  Press,  1963, 
94  pp. 

This  work  presents  the  thesis  that  the  president's  decisions  are 
shaped  by  the  nature  of  his  office.   There  is  a  discussion  of  various 
factors,  political,  economic,  etc.  which  influence  presidential 
decision  making.  Stress  is  placed  upon  the  concept  that  the  decisions 
of  the  president  affect  an  enormous  number  of  people — a  factor  which 
necessarily  colors  the  decision  making  process  in  the  White  House. 

Steinbruner,  John  D.   The  Essence  of  Decision.   1971.   (See  Section  V.C.) 


25 


III.B.  ORGANIZATIONAL  ASPECTS  OF  POLITICAL  DECISION  MAKING  (See  Section 
II. C.  Organizational  Aspects  of  Political  Decision  Making) 


III.C.  PSYCHOLOGICAL  ASPECTS  OF  POLITICAL  DECISION  MAKING  (See  Section 
IV. C.  Psychological  Aspects  of  Political  Decision  Making) 


III.D.  MATHEMATICAL  MODELS  OF  POLITICAL  DECISION  MAKING 

Axelrod,  Robert  M.   A  Framework  for  a^  General  Theory  of  Cognition  and 
Choice.   1972.   (See  Section  IV. E.) 

Axelrod,  Robert  M.   The  Structure  of  Decision.   1976.   (See  Section  IV. C.) 

Crecine,  John  P.   "A  Computer  Simulation  Model  for  Municipal  Budgeting." 
Management  Science  13  (July  1967)  pp.  786-815. 

The  article  presents  a  "positive"  empirical  theoi^  of  municipal 
budgeting.   Based  upon  the  Carnegie  school's  developing  theory 
of  decision  making  as  organizational  process,  a  computer  simula- 
tion of  the  municipal  budgeting  process  is  developed.   This 
article  is  a  condensation  of  Crecine's  longer  work,  A  Computer 
Simulation  of  Municipal  Budgeting. 

Crecine,  John  P.   Governmental  Problem  Solving;  A  Computer  Simulation 
of  Mtmicipal  Budgeting.   Chicago:  Rand  McNally  and  Co.,  1969, 
338  pp. 

After  extensive  interviewing  in  Cleveland,  Pittsburgh,  and  Detroit, 
an  explicit  theory  of  how  the  municipal  budget  setting  process 
occurs  is  posited.   The  theory  focuses  on  the  internal  organiza- 
tional behavior  of  the  various  sub-units  involved  in  the  decision 
making  process.   The  formal  theory  is  codified  into  a  formal 
computer  simulation.   Model  output  is  compared  to  actual  decisions 
as  a  test  of  model  validity.   This  study  is  a  classic  in  the  theory 
of  municipal  budgeting. 


26 


IV.  PSYCHOLOGICAL  DECISION  MAKING 


IV. A.  GENERAL  WORKS  ON  THE  PSYCHOLOGICAL  PERSPECTIVE 

Alutto,  Joseph  A.  and  Belasco,  James  A.   "A  Typology  for  Partici- 
pation in  Organized  Decision  Making."  Administrative  Science 
Quarterly  17  (March  1972)  pp.  117-125. 

In  a  study  conducted  in  two  separate  school  districts  among  454 
faculty  members  there  was  found  the  "universal  desirability  of 
increased  participation  in  decision  making."  The  study  concludes 
that  there  is  a  relationship  between  the  number  of  decisions 
an  individual  wishes  to  participate  in  and  the  number  that  he 
actually  does  participate  in. 

Axelrod,  Robert  M.   "Schemata  Theory:  An  Information  Processing  Model 
of  Perception  and  Cognition."  The  American  Political  Science 
Review  67  (December  1973) 

The  article  states  that  the  source  of  a  message  is  important  for 
its  credence.  It  shows  a  flowchart  by  which  a  message  gets 
sifted  from  one  areas  to  another,  i.e.  into  a  schema.   If  the 
interpretation  of  where  the  evidence,  the  information,  belongs 
is  wrong,  then,  through  satisficing,  a  new  schema  is  found.   If 
the  original  schema  was  successful,  the  information  becomes  more 
"grooved"  into  it. 

Brim,  Orville,  Glass,  David  C. ,  Lavin,  David  E.  and  Goodman,  Norman. 

Personality  and  Decision  Processes.   Stanford:  Stanford  University 
Press,  1962,  336  pp. 

Data  is  collected  in  the  form  of  a  questionnaire  from  200 
parents  in  a  decision  making  simulation  concerning  decisions 
around  child  rearing.   The  data  is  coded  to  demonstrate  how  parents 
performed  on  each  of  ten  dimensions  that  characterized  "rational" 
decision  making.   This  data  is  correlated  with  multiple  measures 
of  parents'  personalities  and  background  in  an  attempt  to  determine 
how  personality  variables  contribute  to  the  decision  making  process. 

Miller,  G.   "The  Magic  Number  7+2:  Some  Limits  on  Our  Capacity  for 
Processing  Information."  The  Psychology  of  Communication  (1967) 
pp.  14-44. 

Miller  whimsically  considers  many  of  the  fundamental  limitations  of 
the  human  mind  in  terms  of  our  ability  to  process  information. 
Based  upon  a  multitude  of  empirical  studies  he  observes  that 
short  term  memory  and  other  information  processing  functions 
of  the  mind  seem  to  be  limited  to  seven  (plus  or  minus  two)  separate 
"chunks."  The  notion  of  limits  to  human  cognitive  ability  is  a 
central  theme  in  cognitively  based  models  of  human  decision  processes. 
He  presents  a  fine  review  of  Tiuch  of  the  literature  as  applied 
to  cognitive  decision  making. 

Thordarson,  Bruce.   Trudeau  and  Foreign  Policy.   1972.   (See  Section  IV. C) 


27 


IV. B.  PSYCHOLOGICAL  CRITIQUES  OF  AND  EXTENSIONS  TO  RATIONALITY 

Miller,  G.   "The  Magic  Number  7+2:  Some  Limits  on  Our  Capacity  for 
Processing  Information."   1976.   (See  Section  IV. A.) 

Siegel,  Sidney.   "Level  of  Aspiration  and  Decision  Making."  Psychological 
Review  64  (July  1957)  pp.  253-262. 

Siegel  argues  that  the  results  of  behavioral  psychology  should  be 
integrated  into  formal  mathematical  descriptions  of  decision  making. 
Specifically  the  notion  of  level  of  aspiration  of  the  subject  and 
reinforcement  attained  from  reaching  a  level  higher  or  lower  than 
the  level  of  aspiration  should  be  incorporated  into  the  utility 
functions  of  individual  decision  makers. 

Slovic,  Paul.   "Limitations  of  the  Mind  of  Man:  Implications  for  Decision 
Making  in  the  Nuclear  Age."  Oregon  Research  Institute  Research 
Bulletin  2  (1971) 

Slovic  discusses  decision  making  as  it  pertains  to  nuclear  events, 
mentioning  such  items  as  biased  judgements  of  probal^_J.istic  events, 
correlation  and  cause,  probablistic  judgements  and  quantifying 
uncertainty.   A  final  point:  with  nuclear  energy  perhaps  we  can 
not  rely  on  a  trial  and  error  approach  to  decision  making. 

Wendt,  Dirk.   "Some  Criticism  of  Stochastic  Models  Generally  Used  in 
Decision  Making  Experiments."   1975.   (See  Section  I.B.) 


IV. C.  PSCHOLOGICAL  ASPECTS  OF  POLITICAL  DECISION  MAKING 

Axelrod,  Robert  M.   "Argumentation  in  Foreign  Policy  Decision-Making: 
Britain  in  1918,  Munich  in  1938  and  Japan  in  1970."   Institute  of 
Public  Policy  Studies  Discussion  Paper,  #  90,  the  University  of 
Michigan,  1976. 

Axelrod  completes  a  causal  analysis  of  the  transcripts  for  all 
three  cases,  looking  at  the  role  of  argumentation  in  each  case, 
as  it  pertained  to  the  decision  making  at  the  time. 

Axelrod,  Robert  M. ,  ed.   The  Structure  of  Decision:  The  Cognitive  Maps 
of  Political  Elites.   Princeton,  N.J.:  Princeton  University  Press, 
1976,  404  pp. 

In  this  collection  of  essays  a  set  of  empirical  techniques  for 
determining  the  cognitive  maps  of  political  elites,  that  is,  how 
political  leaders  tend  to  causally  think  about  the  world,  are 
presented.   Several  empirical  studies  are  also  presented  wherein 
the  cognitive  maps  of  key  decision  makers  or  groups  of  decision 
makers  have  been  assessed  and  analyzed.   The  theory  underlying 
this  approach  is  that  by  better  understanding  the  causal  maps 
actually  employed  by  decision  elites  and  by  promoting  their 
explicit  articulation,  better  decisions  can  result.   Several  essays 
present  mathematical  techniques  for  analyzing  the  strategic  conse- 
quences of  the  empirically  derived  cognitive,  causal  maps. 


28 


Bonham,  G.M. ,  Shapiro,  M.J.  and  Nozicka,  G.J.   "Cognitive  Process 

Model  of  Foreign  Policy  Decision  Making."   Simulation  and  Games  7 
{W<c)    pp.  123-152. 

The  authors  set  about  to  show  that  rational  decision  making  can 
not  possibly  take  into  account  the  fallible  nature  of  man  in 
making  decisions.   Over  five  years  they  worked  to  develop  a 
"cognitive  process"  model  of  policy  decision  making  which  would 
reflect  man's  ability  to  make  irrational  choices. 

Holsti,  Ole  R.   "Crisis,  Stress  and  Decision  Making."   International 
Social  Science  Journal  23  (1971)  pp.  53-67. 
Holsti  completes  a  review  of  the  experimental  psychological 
literature  on  human  reactions  to  crisis  situations.   From  these 
research  findings  he  attempts  to  extrapolate  what  effects  crises 
situations  will  have  on  political  decision  makers.   He  concludes 
that  crisis  induced  differences  in  decision  making  abilities  "are 
likely  to  inhibit  rather  than  facilitate  the  performance  of  those 
engaged  in  the  complex  tasks  of  making  foreign-policy  decisions." 

Holsti,  Ole  R.   "The  'Operational  Code'  Approach  to  the  Study  of  Political 
Leaders:  John  Foster  Dulles'  Philosophical  and  Instrumental  Beliefs." 
Canadian  Journal  of  Political  Science  3  (March  1970) pp.  123-157 
Holsti  studied  Dulles'  writings  to  assess  his  operational  code. 
He  establishes  five  philosophical  and  five  "instrumental"  questions 
or  beliefs  that  Dulles  considered  when  in  a  decision  making 
situation. 

Jervis,  Robert.   Perception  and  Misperception  in  International  Politics. 
Princeton,  N.J.:  Princeton  University  Press,  1976. 

Jervis  reviews  the  bodies  of  psychological  literature  on  perception 
that  appear  to  be  relevant  to  understanding  decision  making 
processes  in  international  politics.   The  emphasis  is  upon  a 
detailed  psychological  description  of  the  perceptual  biases  that 
intelligent  concerned  statesmen  may  tend  to  make  in  the  face  of 
highly  uncertain  and  ambiguous  decision  making  environments.   The 
conclusions  argue  that  to  as  large  a  degree  as  possible,  decisions 
due  to  implicit  perceptual  biases  should  be  replaced  by  explicit 
and  more  reasoned  judgements.   Several  techniques  for  attaining 
this  end  are  presented.   The  volume  presents  a  good  review  of 
the  psychological  literature  of  decision  making. 

Steinbruner,  John  D.   The  Cybernetic  Theory  of  the  Firm.   1974.   (See 
Section  V.C.) 

Thordarson,  Bruce.   Trudeau  and  Foreign  Policy:  A  Study  of  Decision 
Making.   Toronto:  Oxford  University  Press,  1972,  231  pp. 
This  work  completes  an  exhaustive  analysis  of  the  political  philo- 
sophy of  Pierre  Trudeau  as  one  of  the  major  elements  contributing 
to  Canada's  reexamination  of  its  foreign  policy  (resulting  in  a 
shift  toward  "isolationism")  between  1968  and  1970.   The  psycho- 
logical factors  specific  to  Trudeau  are  weighted  against  a  series 
of  environmental  factors  associated  with  1)  Canada's  decision  to 
review  foreign  policy  in  1968  and  2)  Canada's  reduction  in  its 
commitment  to  NATO  in  1969. 


29 


IV. D.  PSYCHOLOGICAL-ORGANIZATIONAL  PERSPECTIVES 

Axelrod,  Robert  M.   "Schemata  Theory:  An  Information  Processing  Model 
of  Perception  and  Cognition."   1973.   (See  Section  IV. A.) 

Cyert,  Richard  M.j  Dill,  W.R.  and  March,  James  G.   "The  Role  of  Expec- 
tations in  Business  Decision  Making."   1958.   (See  Section  II. B.) 

Cyert,  Richard  M. ,  Simon,  Herbert  A.,  and  Trow,  Donald  B.  "Observa- 
tions of  a  Business  Decision."   1960.   (See  Section  II. B.) 

Simon,  Herbert  A.   "A  Behavioral  Model  of  Rational  Choice."   1957. 
(See  Section  I.B.) 

Simon,  Herbert  A.   The  New  Science  of  Management  Decision.   1960. 
(See  Section  V.B.) 


IV. E.  MATHEMATICAL  MODELS  OF  PSYCHOLOGICAL  DECISION  MAKING 

Axelrod,  Robert  M.   A  Framework  for  a.  General  Theory  of  Cognition  and 
Choice.   Berkeley:  Institute  of  International  Studies.  1972, 
35  pp. 

From  the  introduction:  "This  paper  presents  an  outline  of  a 
general  theory  of  cognition  and  choice.   The  purpose  of  the 
general  theory  is  to  encompass  as  many  different  social  sciences 
literatures  as  possible  in  a  single  mathematical  model. 
The  theme  of  the  paper  is  that  many  of  the  same  aspects  of  cogni- 
tion and  choice  problems  have  been  studied  under  different  labels 
in  different  literatures  and  these  various  studies  can  be  related 
to  each  other  in  the  context  of  a  mathematical  model." 

Axelrod,  Robert  M.   The  Structure  of  Decision.   1976.   (See  Section  IV. C.) 

Feigenbaum,  Edward  A.  and  Feldman,  Julian,  eds.   Computers  and  Thought, 
A  Collection  of  Articles  by  Armer  [and  others]   New  York:  McGraw- 
Hill  Book  Company,  Inc.,  1963,  535  pp. 

This  collection  of  eighteen  articles  aptly  summarizes  the  field  of 
artificial  intelligence — a  field  dedicated  to  the  premise  that 
significant  aspects  of  human  cognitive  processes  can  be  reduced 
to  well-ordered  computer  programs  and  studied  via  simulation. 
Although  computers  have  makde  remarkable  progress  in  such  tasks  as 
completing  algebraic  proofs  and  playing  chess,  there  is  little 
empirical  evidence  that  clearly  demonstrates  the  applicability  of 
artificial  intelligence  to  organizational  decision  making  processes. 
The  collection  is  included  for  its  theoretical  richness  and  promise 
rather  than  for  actual  empirical  results  in  the  field  of  organi- 
zational decision  making. 

Simon,  Herbert  A.   Models  of  Man.   1957.   (See  Section  V.A.) 


30 


Simon,  Herbert  A.   The  New  Science  of  Management  Decision.   1960. 
(See  Section  V.B.) 


Taylor,  Michael.   "The  Problem  of  Salience  in  the  Theory  of  Collective 
Decision  Making."   1970.   (See  Section  I.C.2  ) 


31  • 


V.  CROSS  PERSPECTIVE  VIEWS 


V.A.  READERS 


Alexis,  Marcus  and  Wilson,  Charles  Z.,  eds.   Organizational  Decision 

Making.   Englewood  Cliffs,  NoJ.:  Prentice-Hall,  Inc.,  1967,  447  pp. 
Very  broad  in  scope,  this  reader  talks  about  behavioral,  rational, 
and  organizational  views  in  its  various  sections.   Articles  by 
Cyert  and  Simon  should  be  noted.   There  is  also  a  section  on 
quantitative  models  and  the  theory  of  games. 

Feigenbaum,  Edward  A.  and  Feldman,  Julian,  eds.   Computers  and  Thought. 

1963.  (See  Section  IV. E.) 

Gore,  William  J.  and  Dyson  J.W,  eds.   The  Making  of  Decisions;  A  Reader 
in  Administrative  Behavior.   New  York:  The  Free  Press  at  Glencoe, 

1964,  440  pp. 

An  introduction  to  decision  making  strategies,  the  twenty  four 
articles  by  major  thinkers  in  the  field  of  decision  making  (March, 
Cyert,  Simon,  Lindblom,  etc.)  survey  various  perspectives  of  the 
field. 

Rappaport,  Alfred.   Information  for  Decision  Making:  Quantitative  and 
Behavioral  Dimensions.   Englewood  Cliffs,  N.J.:  Prentice-Hall, 
Inc.,  1970,  447  pp. 

A  general  reader,  the  text  starts  with  an  article  on  rational  theory 
and  moves  to  models,  both  computer  and  heuristic,  the  structure  of 
managerial  decision  theory  and  the  use  of  information  systems. 

Rubenstein,  Albert  H.  and  Haberstroh,  Chadwick  J.   Some  Theories  of 
Organization.   Homewood,  111.:  The  Dorsey  Press,  1966,  722  pp. 
The  seventh  section  of  this  reader  on  organizational  theory  is 
devoted  to  decision  making.   The  editors  of  the  work  envision  the 
field  to  be  divided  in  two  camps.   First  there  are  descriptions  of 
behavior  versus  normative  behavioral  perceptions.   Secondly,  the 
field  may  be  divided  into  analysis  of  1)  the  decision,  2)  the 
decision  maker,  and  3)  the  decision  process.   Seven  individual 
essays  are  presented  ranging  from  role  theory  and  small  group 
behavior  to  an  analysis  of  decision  in  large  bureaucratic  organi- 
zations. 

Simon,  Herbert  A.  Models  of  Man:  Social  and  Rational,  Mathematical 

Essays  on  Rational  Human  Behavior  in  a_  Social  Setting.   New  York: 
John  Wiley  and  Sons,  Inc.,  1957,  287  pp. 

Simon  collects  sixteen  previously  published  essays  in  an  attempt  to 
"lay  foundation  for  a  science  of  man  that  will  accommodate  comfort- 
ably his  dual  nature  as  a  social  and  as  a  rational  man."  These 
mathematical  essays  portray  both  a  critique  and  an  extension  of  a 
classical  image  of  man  as  a  decision  maker.   Topics  include  1) 


32 


causation  and  influence  relations,  2)  social  processes,  3)  motiva- 
tion Inducements  and  contributions  and  4)  rationality  and  adminis- 
trative decision  making. 

Weber,  Charles  E.  and  Peters,  Gerald.   Management  Action;  Models  of 

Administrative  Decisions.   Scranton,  Pa. :  International  Textbook 

Company,  1969,  324  pp. 

This  reader  basically  sets  up  alternatives  in  a  modeling  situation 

for  a  variety  of  areas,  sales,  public  health  and  libraries  among 

them.   It  includes  a  chapter  on  models  of  decision  behavior  for 

librarians. 


V.B.  OVERVIEW  ARTICLES,  MONOGRAPHS,  AND  TEXTS 

Braybrooke,  David  and  Lindblom,  Charles  E.   A  Strategy  of  Decision; 

Policy  Evaluation  as  a^  Social  Process.   New  York;  The  Free  Press, 
1970,  268  pp. 

Braybrooke  and  Lindblom  present  an  alternative  to  synoptic  rationalism. 
Decisions  are  not  made  by  a  single  actor  who  finds  all  the  alternatives 
and  selects  the  best  from  among  them.   Instead  individual  decision 
makers  complete  limited  comparisons  between  given  alternatives,   the 
given  alternatives  often  being  quite  close  to  the  current  set  of 
affairs.   The  argument  is  made  that  this  disjoint  and  Incremental 
approach  to  decision  making  (as  opposed  to  synoptlcally  rational) 
is  1)  the  method  currently  practiced  in  most  public  bureaucracies, 
and  2)  tends  to  blend  the  complexly  intertwined  values  and  interests 
of  multiple  Interest  groups  much  better  than  a  rational  process 
ever  could.   An  excellent  monograph. 

Ebert,  Ronald  J.  and  Mitchell,  Terence  R.   Organizational  Decision 

Processes;  Concepts  and  Analysis.   New  York:  Crane,  Russak,  1975, 
331  pp. 

A  readable  Introduction  to  the  field  of  decision  making  displaying 
much  of  the  diversity  of  the  field  (perhaps  as  a  text  for  a  course) . 
However,  the  stated  aim  of  presenting  an  "integrated  whole"  Is  met 
more  by  a  unified  writing  style  emphasizing  some  points  of  tangency 
rather  than  by  a  genuine  unification  of  the  multiple  perspectives. 
A  view  that  starts  with  the  individual's  cognitive  processes  and 
works  out  to  Include  organizational  and  environmental  variables  is 
presented.   Special  topics  such  as  information  processes,  beliefs 
and  values,  formal  models,  group  processes,  and  organizational  power 
are  presented  in  separate  chapters. 

Gore,  William  J.  and  Sllander,  Fred  S.   "A  Bibliographic  Essay  on  Decision- 
Making."  Administrative  Science  Quarterly  4  (1959)  pp.  97-121. 
Gore  sees  decision  making  as  a  fractured  and  conceptually  incomplete 
body  of  literature.   However,  he  pursues  two  central  threads  in  his 
analysis,  the  behavloristlc  or  organismic  and  the  rationalistic. 


33 


The  (at  the  time)  emerging  work  at  Carnegie  Mellon  under  Simon 
is  viewed  as  half  way  between  these  two  threads  verging  more  toward 
rationalistic „  Within  the  organismic  approach  Gore  traces  three 
threads,  the  web  of  organizational  relations  connecting  the 
deciding  group  to  its  environment,  the  organizational  context  and 
structure  of  the  decision  making  process,  and  finally,  behavioral 
descriptions  of  the  decision  making  process  itself.   The  rational 
approach  is  a  normative  attempt  to  reduce  non-rationality  and 
irrationality  through  management  science  techniques  such  as  game 
theory,  statistical  decision  theory,  and  linear  programming.   This 
final  section  is  quite  dated » 

Radford,  K.J.   Managerial  Decision  Making.   Reston,  Va.,:  Reston  Publish- 
ing Company,  Inc.,  1975,  240  pp. 

Written  as  a  possible  text  for  senior  undergraduates  or  graduate 
business,  commerce  or  management  science  students,  this  work  uses 
a  combination  of  approaches  to  decision  making,  namely  quantitative 
plus  humanistic  and  organizational  behavior.   In  its  combined 
approach  it  also  discusses  game  theory  and  group  behavior. 

Shubik,  Martin.   "Approaches  to  the  Study  of  Decision  Making  Relevant  to 
the  Firm."  Journal  of  Business  34  (April  1961)  pp.  101-118. 
This  essay  begins  with  a  critique  of  the  classical  "economic  man"  as 
the  core  of  the  theory  of  the  firm.   A  taxonomy  of  emerging  alternative 
approaches  to  the  theory  of  the  firm  is  presented o   No  attempt  is 
made  to  give  an  exhaustive  treatment  of  each  of  the  alternatives 
sketched.  "The  traditional  areas  of  economics,  psychology,  mathematics, 
and  statistics,  to  name  a  few,  have  not  provided  adequate  theories 
to  explain  many  problems  of  decision  making  in  a  complex  and  uncertain 
environment..^.   The  work  discussed  here  is  beginning  to  replace 
l^economic  man}  with  a  less  pure,  more  complex  and  flexible  individual 
whose  problems  and  behavior  are  closer  to  those  we  find  in  the  world 
arusund  us." 

Shubik,  Martin.   "Studies  and  Theories  of  Decision  Making."  Administrative 
Science  Quarterly  3  (December  1958)  pp.  289-306. 

An  overview  to  various  theories  of  decision  making  is  presented.   The 
bulk  of  the  work  concentrates  on  1)  economic  man,  2)  a  theory  of  the 
firm,  3)  a  discussion  of  simulation  approaches  to  economic  man  and 
4)  the  building  of  an  economic  model.   This  emphasis  reflects  the 
author's  training  in  economics.   Other  sections  allude  to  the  fact 
that  processes  (such  as  psychological  and  small  group  ones)  also 
contribute  to  the  decision  making  process. 

Simon,  Herbert  A.   The  New  Science  of  Management  Decision.   New  York: 
Harper  and  Row,  Publishers,  1960,  50  pp. 

These  five  essays  are  adapted  from  a  series  of  three  lectures 
given  at  NYU  in  1960.   In  these  essays  Simon  points  to  a  picture 
concerning  the  future  of  the  "new  science"  of  management.   Routine 
or  programmed  decision  making  will  be  replaced  by  operations  research 
type  methods  and  unprogrammed  decisions  will  be  significantly  aided 
by  heuristic  problem  solving  techniques.   An  intuitive  introduction 
to  heuristic  problem  solving  is  given.   Finally,  a  sketch  of  a  new 


34 


focus  of  "man-machine  systems  for  decision  making"  is  presented. 
Although  these  projections  now  seem  overly  optimistic,  they  do 
provide  an  interesting  perspective  on  where  leaders  of  the  manage- 
ment science  field  saw  themselves  going  in  the  early  1960s. 

Simon,  Herbert  A.   The  Sciences  of  the  Artificial,   Cambridge,  Mass.: 
M.I.T.  Press,  1969,  123  pp„ 

This  volume  presents  four  linked  essays,  originally  presented  in 
1968  as  part  of  the  Karl  Taylor  Compton  lecture  series  at  M.I.T. 
In  a  reflection  over  nearly  thirty  years  of  seminal  work,  Simon  makes 
a  rather  obvious  distinction  between  "natural"  and  "artificial" 
systems — an  artificial  "system  being  modeled,  by  goals  or  purposes, 
to  the  environment  in  which  it  lies."  Artificial  systems  comprise 
the  man-made  world — they  have  been  designed  and  are  maintained  by 
human  ingenuity.   The  science  of  design — the  science  of  the  artificial- 
is  common  to  engineering,  law,  medicine,  business;  in  a  word  all 
practioners  who  design  the  artifacts  of  our  culture.   In  these 
stimulating  essays  Simon  asks  whether  or  not  there  are  general 
principles  of  design  for  artificial  systems  that  can  serve  as  the 
basis  for  a  new  science  of  the  artificial. 

Snyder,  Richard  C,  Bruck,  H.W.  and  Sapin,  Burton.   Foreign  Policy  Decision 
Making.   1962.   (See  Section  III..A.) 


V.C.  ANALYSES  EXPLICITLY  BASED  ON  MULTIPLE  PERSPECTIVES 

Allison,  Graham  T,   "Conceptual  Models  and  the  Cuban  Missile  Crisis." 

American  Political  Science  Review  63  (September  1969)  pp.  689-718. 
This  is  the  early  work  leading  to  Allison's  Essence  of  Decision, 

Allison,  Graham  T.   The  Essence  of  Decision;  Explaining  the  Cuban  Missile 
Crisis.   Boston:  Little,  Brown  and  Company,  1971,  338  pp. 
Three  distinct  models:  the  rational,  organizational  and  bureaucratic 
political  are  derived  and  their  fundamental  assumptions  exposed. 
Then  each  of  the  three  views  of  decision  making  is  used  to  explain  the 
decision  making  processes,  both  Russian  and  American,  surrounding  the 
Cuban  missile  crisis.   Close  attention  is  paid  to  how  the  analyst  by 
switching  his  analytic  frame  of  reference  can  arrive  at  quantitatively 
different  interpretations  of  the  decision  making  process.   This  was  a 
pioneering  piece  of  work,  advocating  that  analysts  would  do  well  to 
view  decision  making  process  as  a  multiple  perspective  affair. 

Hesse,  Rick  and  Altman,  Steve.   "Star  Trek:  Optimum  Decision  Making  Model." 
Interfaces  6  (May  1976)  pp.  60-62. 

Speck's  cool  and  unemotional  assessments  of  even  the  most  tense  moments 
are  exactly  what  rational,  "operation  research"  analysts  aspire  to. 
But  often  Captain  Kirk  ignores  Spock's  analytic  view  of  the  situation 
in  favor  of  Doctor  McCoy's  more  human  and  intuitive  assessment  of  the 
situation.   Of  course.  Captain  Kirk  always  makes  the  best — the  "optimum" — 


35 


decision.   The  magic  of  the  Star  Trek  model  lies  in  its  uncanny 
ability  to  blend  the  cool  and  analytic  with  the  warm  and  affective 
side  of  decision  making.   How  do  they  do  it?  How  could  we  do  it? 

Steinbruner,  John  D.   The  Cybernetic  Theory  of  Decision:  New  Dimensions 

of  Political  Analysis.   Princeton,  N.J.:  Princeton  University  Press, 
1974,  366  pp. 

Three  perspectives  on  the  decision  making  process  are  presented  in  the 
first  half  of  the  book — a  form  of  rational,  organizational,  and 
psychological.   The  organizational  perspective  draws  heavily  on  the 
work  of  Cyert  and  March  and  views  political  organizations  as  cybernetic 
mechanisms  that  use  a  small  number  of  standardized  routines  and 
operating  procedures  to  match  organizational  goals  with  the  constraints 
put  upon  the  organization  by  its  environment »   The  psychological 
portions  of  the  model  draw  heavily  upon  cognitive  psychology,  picturing 
human  decision  makers  as  information  processors  with  only  limited 
abilities  to  delineate  all  alternatives  and  to  integrate  complex  and 
sometimes  contradictory  values  and  goals.   In  the  second  half  of  the 
book  the  perspectives  delineated  in  the  first  half  are  applied  to  the 
case  of  strategic  arms  negotiations  in  Europe. 

Steinbruner,  John  D.   "Some  Effects  of  Decision  Procedures  on  Policy 

Outcomes:  A  Series  of  Experiments  Using  Policy  Games."  Cambridge, 
Mass.:  M.I.T.  Center  for  International  Studies,  1970,  151  pp. 
In  his  earlier  work  Steinbruner  has  articulated  a  "cybernetic  theory 
of  decision."   In  this  work  he  sets  out  to  test  the  hypothesis  that 
"individuals  who  utilize  a  process  fitting  the  rational  paradigm 
j^willj  make  different  decisions  than  individuals  utilizing  a  process 
fitting  the  cybernetic  paradigm."  A  gaming  situation  is  devised  for 
testing  this  central  hypothesis.   The  findings  of  the  game  were 
subject  to  rather  severe  validity  constraints  but  could  still  be 
seen  as  useful.   "Any  serious  research  program  using  PME  (games) 
as  a  research  device  should  integrate  it  with  the  other  levels  of 
analysis  and  the  other  methods  and  data  bases  which  they  imply." 


Lo  I 


W    O    'T 


BASEMENT 

Date  Due 


MAR  2  0  138) 


Lib-26-67 


.'.4v 


'7* 


MAR'        4    198?" 


HD28M414   no.943-    77 

Andersen,   Oebo/Theones   of   decision   ma 

731705 D»BKS.        00037732 


I 


3  TDflQ  000  flb?  D7M 


HD28.IVI4)4   no.    944-    77 

Choffray,   Jean/An   operational   struclur 

732564 D?B.KS  00044'^ 


3  TOflO  000  TSO  Tfl7 


HD28.IV1414   no.945-    77 

Zannetos,   Zeno/Feasible   alternatives   f 

^■^^^^^lll  IlllllllPtfll'^l        °'?P?^''?' 

3  TOfiO  000  flfiT  b31 

HD28.M414   no.    948-    77 

Harris.   Reuben/The   concept   of   client   0 

73256g  D*BKS  00044580 

iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiililiiiiliiii 

3  lOfiO  000  TSO  370 


HD28.IVI414   no.949-    77 

Welsch,   Roy   El/Tables    for   stepwise   mul 

73322.1..  D*BKS  0Qi)''6645 

3    TOflO    000    T7M    m7 


HD28.M414   no.950-    77 

Kuh.    Edwin.         /A   Monte   Carlo   study   of 

7  3  3  2 1.3 ^  0  *  BK  ^^^       ^ ,  Op.Pl?  1) "  ■ 


3    TOflO    00 


0    T7T    07? 


HD28.IVI414   no.    951-    77 

Lorange,   Peter/Implementation   of    strat 

732558  D*BkS  00044581. 


3  TOSO  ODD  TSO  STb 


HD28M414   no.   952-    77 

Van   Breda.  M.   /Capital   budoeting   using 

732570 p*m  00044582 


3  TOflO  000 


T50  T12