Skip to main content

Full text of "The titration of iron by potassium permanganate"

See other formats


Illinois  Institute 

of  Technology 

UNIVERSITY  LIBRARIES 


AT  332 

-Finkelstein,  L. 
The  titration  of  iron  by 
potassium  permanganate 


For  Use  fn  Librasy  Only 


> 


THE  TI-TRATION  OF  IRON  BY 
POTASSIUM  PERMANGANATE . 

A  THESIS 
Presented  by 

LEO  FIMELSTEIN .        ILLINOIS  INSTITUTE  OF  TECHNOLOGY 

PAUL  V.  GALVIN  LIBRARY 
35  WEST  33RO  STREET 
To  The  CHICAGO,  IL  60616 

President   and  Faculty 
■    of 
ARIVIOUR  INSTITUTE  OP   TECHNOLOGY 
FOR   THE   DEGREE  OP 
BACHELOR   OF   SCIENCE    IN    CHEMICAL   ENGINEERING 
HAVING    COMPLETED   THE   PRESCRIBED   COURSE  CP   STUDY   IN 
CHEMICAL  ENGII^EERING 
1914. 

APP  ROVED  :(2^^4y?^^!^t^W^?^^-v^^^>^ 

Ty  ^Professor  of   Chemical  Engineering. 

APPROVED :  ^^y'^^V^-^z^^^^^L-^-^.^^^^^^^ 

'Dean  of  the  Engineering  Studies. 


TABLE    OF   GOIffENTS. 


Introduction   ----------   Page  1 

Theoretical      ------------  3 

Experimental   ------------  4 

I.    Solubility   of  Ferrous 

Sulphate      ----------  6 

II.  Titration  with  Sulphuric 

Acid      ------------  6 

III.  Titration  with  Hydrochloric 

Acid      ------------  10 

Conclusion  -------------  11 


msm 


liffRODUCTIOH, 

It    is   v/ell  knovm  that    ferrous    salts    cannot 
be    oxidized   quantitatively  by  potassium  perman- 
ganate   in  the   presence    of  hydrochloric   acid 
without   using   one    of  the    several   "guard   solutions" 
recommended   for   that   purpose.      The   reaction  with 
hydrochloric   acid  and   the   mechanism  of  the   pro- 
tecting   influence    of  the    "guard   solution"   are 
in  general  not   understood.      Ostwald    (Foundations 
of  Analytical  Chemistry)    says:    "the    solution 
must   be   acid  with   sulphuric   acid   but   not   with 
hydrochloric   acid,    since    permanganate    oxidizes 
the    latter    in  the   presence    of   iron  salts.      It 
is   a   catalytic   reaction  7/hich  goes    on  here,    but 
very   little    is   known  yet    of  the    laws   which  reg- 
ulate   it".    On  account    of  the   desirability   of 
titrating  an   iron  solution   in  the   presence    of 
hydrochloric   acid   from  the   viewpoint    of   the 
technical  analyst,   Asso.    Professor  B.   B.    Freud 

is   engaged    in  studying   the   whole   problem.      As 
a   part    of  this    larger   problem,    I  have   titrated 


ferrous  salts  with  permanganate  in  the  presence 
of  sulphuric  acid  and  hydrochloric  acid,  with 
wide  variations  in  hydrogen  ion  and  chlorine  ion 
concentration.   This  v/ork  is  necessary  because 
of  serious  discrepancies  in  the  literature. 
(Qualitatively  the  disturbing  influence  of  chlor- 
ine ions  has  long   been  known,  but  its  exact 
quantitative  influence  has  not  been  determined. 

The  object  of  this  work  was  to  get  definite 
and  reliable  data,  and  the  plan  followed  was:- 

(1)  To  titrate  ferrous  ions  of  a  definite 
concentration  in  the  presence  of  hydrogen  and 
sulphate  ions  of  definite  but  varying  concen- 
trations.  The  maximum  concentration  of  sulphuric 
acid  used  was  determined  by  the  solubility  of 
ferrous  sulphate  in  aqueous  sulphuric  acid. 

(2)  To  titrate  the  same  ferrous  ion  con- 
centration in  the  presence  of  hj^drogen  and  chlor- 
ine ions  of  the  same  ion  concentrations  as  were 
employed  before.   The  maximum  hydrochloric  acid 
concentration  used  was  determined  by  the  ability 
to  get  a  definite  end  point. 


THE   TITRATION   OF    IRON  BY  POTASSIUId   PERivlANGANATE  . 

THEORETICAL. 


If  hydrochloric   acid    is   present    in  the    sol- 
ution when   ferrous    iron   is   titrated   v/ith  potass- 
ium permanganate    it    is   knovm  that   the    results 
obtained  are    inaccurate.      The   reason   for  this 
discrepancy    is   usually  attributed   to  the    reaction 
betv/een  hydrochloric   acid  and  potassium  perman- 
ganate  according   to  the    follov/ing  equation: 

10  HGltMngOy  ->  2MnO  -J-SHgO  tSGlg 
If   this   reaction   is   regular  and    if  discrepancies 
are    due   merely   to   liberation   of   chlorine,    then 
the    araount    of   chlorine    evolved    should   be    equi- 
valent   in   oxidizing  power   to  the   excess    of  per- 
manganate.     ',7.    G.   Birch    (Ghemical  'Tews,    '''01.99) 
measured   this   excess   and    found    that   the   amount 
of  permanganate   was    less   than  that   calculated 
from  the    above    equation.      This    points    to  another 
relation  beside   that   which   liberates    chlorine. 

Eirch  advances   the   theory  that   the    reaction 
betvireen  hydrochloric   acid   and  potassium  perman- 
ganate   is  as    follows: 

MngOY^-U   HGl-»2   Mn  Gl^**- 7H2O4.4GI2 


This   would   explain  the    supp-ression   of  chlorine 
v/hen  raanganous    salts   are   added,    as  Rice    (Journal 
Chemical  Socfety   1899)    has    shown  that  MnCl^  and 
free    chlorine   when  sealed   up    in  a   tube,    react 
slowly  to   c^ive   MnCl^  .    Pickering    (Journal  Chem- 
ical  Society   1879)    also  has    shown  that    the   amount 
of  manganic    salt   produced  v;hen  MnOp   dissolves 
in  hydrochloric   acid  was    increased  by  the   pres- 
ence   of  MnClo  • 

The   use    of  manganous    salts    for   this   purpose 
was    first   proposed   by  G.   Zimmerman   (Ber.   d.    Ghem. 
Ges.    1884,    15) . 

EXPERIiBNTAL. 


The    ferrous    salt   used   v/as    ferrous    sulphate 
(FeSO. 'THgO) ,    Baker's  Analyzed   Chemicals.      Its 
analysis   by  the   manufacturer   showed  a   trace    of 
ferric    sulphate .     Although   ferrous   ammonium  sul- 
phate   is   much  more    stable   than   ferrous    sulphate, 
it   was   thought   desirable   to  use    ferrous    sulphate, 
as   the    solution   of  amraonium  sulphate   v/ould    intro- 
duce   NH^    ions   and    complicate   the   work. 


The  potassium  permanganate  solution  used 
v;as  approximately  tenth  normal.   It  was  standard- 
ized against  sodium  oxalate  obtained  from  the 
Bureau  of  Standards.   The  method  was  as  follows; 
(lI.S.McEride,  Journal  American  Society  Vol. 34.) 

In  a  400cc,  beaker,  0.25  gram  of  sodium 
oxalate  was  dissolved  in  200cc .  hot  water  (80- 
90°G.)  and  lOcc .  (1:1)  sulphuric  acid  added.   The 
solution  was  titrated  at  once.   The  permanganate 
was  added  slowly,  not  mor~-  rapidly  than  10  to  15 
cc.  per  minutG,  and  the  last  0.5  to  l.Occ.  were 
added  dropwise,  allowing  each  drop  to  he  discolor- 
ized  before  the  next  was  introduced.   The  excess 
of  permanganate  used  to  cause  an  end  point  color 
was  estimated  by  matching  the  color  in  another 
beaker  containing  the  same  amount  of  acid  and  hot 

water . 

The    sulphuric   acid   used   was    chemically  pure 
sulphuric   acid,    sp.gr.    1.83,    manufactured  by  the 
Grasselli  Chemical  Go.      The   hydrochloric   acid  was 
chemically  pure    hjrdrochloric   acid,    sp.gr.    1.20 
manufactured  by  the    same    firm. 


I.   Solubility   of  Ferrous   Sulphate 
in  Sulphiiric  Acid  .  

It  was   necessary  to  determine    the    solubility 
of   ferrous   sulphate    in  aqueous    sulphuric   acid 
solution   in   order  to  titrate   as    concentrated   sul- 
phuric  acid   solution  as    possible.      One   gram   of 
ferrous    sulphate   ivas   dissolved    in   increasing 
amounts    of  v/ater   and  concentrated   sulphuric   acid 
run   in   from  a   burette   until  precipitation   of 
anliydrous    ferrous   sulphate    occured. 

TABLa    I. 

Water .  Sulphuric   acid   to  precipitate. 

5.0----------3.50 

10.0   ----------    9.15 

15.0    ---------      15.05 

20.0    ---------      24.15 

25.0    ---------      50.00 

30.0    ---------      63.50 

40.0---------   200.      (no  precipitation) 

These   values   were   plotted   and   from  the    curve 
it   was   decided  to  start   titrating  v/lth  a   maximum 
concentration   of   160cc.    sulphuric   acid  and  40cc . 
water . 

II.  Titration  with  Sulphuric  Acid ._ 

One   gram   of    ferrous   sulphate   vv-as   used   for 


each  titration.   The  procedure  was  as  follows: 
The  ferrous  sulphate  was  weighed  into  a  400cc. 
beaker  and  the  water  added  from,  pipettes.   When 
the  salt  was  dissolved,  sulphuric  acid,  sp.gr. 
1,83,  was  added  from  pipettes.   In  every  case 
the  total  bulk  of  solution  was  200cc .   The  sol-  ' 
ution  was  cooled  in  a  bath  of  running  water  to 
20"g.   It  was  then  titrated  with  Xtenth  noraal 
permanganate . 

TABLS  II. 

No.   cc  HgO   cc  HgSO^    NorKality.  cc  XN  KMnO^ 


1 

40 

160 

27.0 

37.50 

2 

40 

160 

27.0 

37.80 

3 

40 

160 

27,0 

37.55 

4 

40 

160 

27.0 

37.50 

5 

45 

155 

26.2 

37.65 

6 

45 

155 

26.2 

37.30 

7 

45 

155 

26.2 

37.27 

8 

45 

155 

26.2 

37.30 

9 

50 

150 

25.3 

37.32 

10 

50 

150 

25.3 

37.46 

11 

50 

150 

25.3 

37.45 

12 

50 

150 

25.3 

37.43 

13 

55 

14  5 

24.5 

37.05 

14 

55 

145 

24.5 

37.08 

15 

55 

145 

24.5 

37.05 

16 

60 

140 

23.6 

37.35 

17 

60 

140 

23.6 

37.30 

18 

60 

140 

23.6 

37.30 

19 

65 

135 

22.8 

37.30 

20 

65 

135 

22.8 

37.30 

21 

65 

135 

22.8 

37.30 

22 

70 

130 

21.9 

37.18 

8 


TABLE    II   GOIfT'D 


No. 

ccHpO 

cc    H2SO4 

Normality 

cc   XN  KMnO^ 

23 

70 

130 

21.9 

37.35 

24 

70 

130 

21.9 

37.36 

25 

70 

130 

21.9 

37.38 

26 

75 

125 

21.1 

37.30(:?.) 

27 

75 

125 

21.1 

36.80 

28 

75 

125 

21. L 

36.75 

29 

75 

125 

21.1 

36.73 

30 

75 

125 

21.1 

36.72 

31 

80 

120 

20.3 

36.80 

32 

80 

120 

20.3 

36.65 

33 

80 

120 

20.3 

36.80 

34 

80 

120 

20.3 

36.81 

35 

85 

115 

19.4 

36.40 

36 

85 

115 

19.4 

36.43 

37 

85 

115 

19.4 

36.42 

38 

90 

110 

18.6 

36.50 

39 

90 

110 

18.6 

36.50 

40 

90 

110 

18.6 

36.50 

41 

95 

105 

17.75 

36.64 

42 

95 

105 

17.75 

36.70 

43 

95 

105 

17.75 

36.70 

44 

100 

100 

16.9 

36.82 

45 

100 

100 

16.9 

36.85 

46 

100 

100 

16.9 

36.85 

47 

100 

100 

16.9 

36.88 

48 

105 

95 

16.5 

37.10 

49 

105 

95 

16.5 

36.93 

50 

105 

95 

16.5 

36.94 

51 

105 

95 

16.5 

36.92 

52 

110 

90 

15.2 

37.00 

53 

110 

90 

15.2 

36.98 

54 

110 

90 

15.2 

36.97 

55 

115 

85 

14.36 

37.00 

56 

115 

85 

14.36 

36.95 

57 

115 

85 

14.36 

36.95 

58 

120 

80 

13.5 

36.96 

59 

120 

80 

13.5 

36.94 

60 

120 

80 

13.5 

36.98 

61 

125 

75 

13.7 

36.95 

9 


TABLS    11   CONT'D. 


-^ 

No. 

CC    HgO 

CC   HgSO^ 

Normality 

CC  XN  KMn04 

62 

125 

75 

12.7 

36.95 

63 

125 

75 

12.7 

36.80 

64 

130 

70 

11.8 

37.00 

65 

130 

70 

11.8 

37.00 

66 

130 

70 

11.8 

37.00 

67 

13  5 

65 

11.0 

36.98 

68 

135 

65 

11.0 

36.97 

69 

135 

65 

11.0 

36.98 

70 

140 

60 

10.13 

36.95 

71 

140 

60 

10.13 

36.95 

72 

140 

60 

10.13 

36.95 

73 

145 

55 

9.2 

36.90 

74 

14  5 

55 

9.2 

36.92 

75 

145 

55 

9.2 

36.93 

76 

150 

50 

8.45 

3  6.90 

77 

150 

50 

8.45 

36.90 

78 

150 

50 

8.45 

36.90 

79 

160 

40 

6.75 

36.95 

80 

160 

40 

6.75 

36.95 

81 

160 

40 

6.75 

36.95 

82 

170 

30 

5.07 

36,92 

83 

170 

30 

5.07 

36.94 

84 

170 

30 

5.07 

36.92 

85 

180 

20 

3.38 

36.83 

86 

180 

20 

3.38 

36.80 

87 

180 

20 

3.38 

36.85 

88 

185 

15 

2.53 

37.05 

89 

185 

15 

2.53 

36.95 

90 

185 

15 

2.53 

36.95 

91 

185 

15 

2.53 

36.90 

92 

190 

10 

1.69 

36.80 

93 

190 

10 

1.69 

36.82 

94 

190 

10 

1.69 

36.70 

95 

190 

10 

1.69 

36.80 

96 

195 

5 

0.845 

36.80 

97 

195 

5 

0.845 

36.80 

98 

195 

5 

0.845 

36.80 

10 


The    strength   of  permanganate   used  was   as    follows ; - 

Titration  !Io.    1  to   5    incl.    .0981   normal. 
"  "      6    "    30         "         .0979         " 

"  "    31    "    98         "         .0980         " 

In  titrating  the   higher  acid   concentrations 

it   was    found   that    if  the   titration  v/as   carried    on 

slowly   the    solutions    turned   brown  thus    obscuring 

the    end   points.      If  titrated   rapidly  the   end 

point    is    fairly   sharp. 

Ill ._  Titration  with  Hydrochloric  Acid. 
One   gram  of   ferrous   sulphate   was   used   for 
each  titration.      The   water  and  acid  were   added    in 
the    same   manner  as    in  the    titration  v\?ith   sul- 
phuric  acid.      The    solutions   were    cooled   to  20°C. 


bef. 

ore   titra 

ting. 

TABLS 

III. 

ITo. 

cc   HpO 

cc   HGl 

Normality 

99 

199 

1 

0.164 

100 

199 

1 

0.164 

101 

198 

2 

0.328 

lOii 

198 

2 

0.328 

103 

197 

3 

0.492 

104 

197 

3 

0.492 

105 

197 

3 

0.492 

106 

195 

5 

0.820 

107 

195 

5 

0.820 

cc   XN  KMnO^ 


37 

.50 

37 

.53 

37 

.60 

37, 

.63 

37, 

.69 

37, 

.60 

37. 

,67 

37. 

,65 

37. 

,63 

11 


TAELS  III  CONT'D. 


No. 

cc  HgO 

cc  HGl 

Normality 

cc  XN  KMn04 

108 

190 

10 

1.64 

37.58 

109 

190 

10 

1.64 

37.56 

110 

180 

20 

3.28 

37.60 

111 

180 

20 

3.28 

37.40 

112 

175 

25 

4.10 

37.60 

113 

175 

25 

4.10 

37.55 

114 

170 

30 

4.92 

37.40 

115 

170 

30 

4.92 

37.50 

116 

160 

40 

6.56 

no  definite 
end  point. 

When  the  concentration  of  the  acid  increased 
beyond  half  normal  the  yellow  color  of  the  sol- 
ution obscured  the  end  point  to  such  an  extent 
that  the  results  could  not  be  taken  very  accur- 
ately.  No  odor  of  chlorine  was  given  off  during 
the  titrations . 

CONCLUSION. 

1.  It  is  definitely  determined  that  var- 
iations in  the  concentrations  of  hydrogen  ions 
from  O.ON  to  15. N  in  the  presence  of  30/,  ions 
of  the  same  concentration  does  not  influence 
the  amount  of  permanganate  required. 

2.  A  concentration  of  hydrogen  ions  great- 


12 


er   than  15. N  in  the  presence  of  SO^  ions  of  the 
same  concentration  influences  the  amount  of 
permanganate  required  by  as  much  as  3fo. 

3.  In  case  of  a  concentration  of  hydro- 
gen and  chlorine  ions  greater  than  0.5N  the 
end  point  cann  ;t  be  accurately  determined. 

4.  For  hydrogen  ion  concentrations  below 
0.5N  in  the  presence  of  chlorine  ions  of  the 
same  concentration,  ferrous  salts  can  be  titrated 
with  an  error  of  not  more  than  one  half  of  one 
percent . 


to        xo  30       ^o         so        Lo       -?o        S»         "to        fOO 


mi 


"SnB^UjHHBIiBHHnj 

isiBBHHlBHK^i 

ffiHBiiHiMBMHHBi