mm
TRANSACTIONS
OF THE
15 r is 1 0 1 u ntr (£ ta ut c st tx $ Ij i re
^rcb ;ro ( 0 g i t a I Batxztri
FOR 1889-90..
Thb Council of the Bki.stol and Gloucestershire Archaeological
Society desires that it should be distinctly understood that the
Council is not responsible for any statements made, or opinions
expressed, in the Transactions of the .Society. The Authors alone
are responsible for their several Papers and Communications, and the
Editor for the Notices of Books.
Donations of Historical or Antiquarian Books, Tracts,
Maps, Engraving's, &c, are invited to the Society's Library
at the Museum, Gloucester. Librarian— The Rev. Wm.
Bazeley, M.A., Hon. Gen. Sec.
TRANSACTIONS
OF THE
Bristol & (ftlourrotrrolitrr
Hvtfyataloqital Society
FOR 1889-90.
Edited by SIE JOHN MACLEAN, F.S.A., &c.
VOL. XIV.
BRISTOL :
PRINTED FOR THE SOCIETY BY C. T. JEFFERIES AND SONS, Limited,
BACK HALL, BALDWIN STREET, & CANYNGE BUILDINGS, REDCL1FFE STREET.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Transactions at Berkeley - - - ■ 1-4
Transactions at Cheltenham .... 189-215
The Architectural History of Avening Church, Glouc. By R.
Herbert Carpenter, F.S.A., and B. Ingelow, Architects 5-13
Testa de Nevill. Returns for Gloucestershire. By Sir Henry
Barkly, K.C.B., G.C.M.G. - - - 14-47
The Ancient Apse of Deerhurst Church, By the Rev. George
BUTTERWORTH - - - - 48-49
History of the Manor and Advowson of Clifford Chambers, and
some account of its Possessors. By Sir John Maclean,
F.S.A., V.P. - - - 50-116
Abbot Newland's Roll of the Abbots of St. Augustine's Abbey,
Bristol. Communicated by J. H. Jeayes, Esq. ' - 117-130
Sanctuary Knockers. By Mary Ellen Bagnall-Oakley - 131-140
Pychenecumbe — Abstracts of Original Documents in the Regis-
ters of the Abbey of St. Peter's, Gloucester. By the Rev.
John Melland Hall, M.A. - - - 141-162
Leland in Gloucestershire. By John Latimer - - 221-224
Remarks on the Liber Niger, or Black Book of the Exchequer.
By Sir Henry Barkly, K.C.B., G.C.M.G. - - 285-320
On Old Tools and Implements. By Robert Taylor, M.A. - 321-327
Sevenhampton. By the Rev. John Melland Hall, M.A. - 328-355
A Perambulation of the Forest of Dean, co. Gloucester, 10th
Edward I. Contributed by Sir John Maclean, F.S.A.,
F.R.S.A. (Ireland) ----- 356-369
Accounts of Receipts and Payments for Exploration of the
Roman Villa at Tockington Park. By Sir John Maclean 216-219
Treasurer's Annual Account, 188S-9 - - - 220
In Memoriam—Rey, Harry Mengden Scarth, M.A. . - 164-165
„ „ William Henry Paine, F.R.C. P., F.G.S, - 370
NOTICES OF RECENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL
PUBLICATIONS.
Diocese of Salisbury — The Church Plate of the County of Dorset,
with Extracts from the Returns of Church Goods by the
Dorset Commissioners of Edward VI., 1552. By J. E.
Nightingale, F.S.A. .... 165-172
The Gentleman's Magazine Library — Bibliographical Notes.
Edited by Georce Lawrentce Gomme, F.S.A. - - 172-174
Barnstaple, and the Northern Part of Devonshire during the
Great Civil War, 1642-1646. by Richard W. Cotton - 174-179
Popular County History. — A History of Cumberland. By Rich.
H. Ferguson, M. A., LL.M., F.S A. - - - 179-182
The A. B.C. Book, both in Latin and English : being a, facsimile
of the earliest extant English Reading Book, with an Intro-
duction by E. S. Shuckburgh, M.A. - - - 182
Proceedings of the Clifton Antiquarian Club for 1884-6 (Vol. I.)
Edited by Alfred E. Hudd, F.S.A. - - - 183-184
A Dictionary of Heraldry, with upwards of 2500 Illustrations.
By Charles Norton Elvin, M.A. - - 184
The Antiquary.— A Magazine devoted to the Study of the Past.
Vols. XX. and XXI. - 185, 390
Yorkshire Chap Books. Edited by Charles A. Federer, L.C.P. 185-186
Yorkshire Legends and Traditions, &c. By the Rev. Thomas
Parkinson - 186-187
Calendar of State Papers (Domestic Series), 1644-16±6. Edited
by William Douglas Hamilton, Esq., F.S.A., of
H.M. Record Office - - - 371-373
Fort Ancient, the Great Pre-historic Earthwork of Warren
County, Ohio, U.S.A. By William K. Moorhead - 373-375
An Introduction to English Economic History and Theory. By
W. J. Ashley, M.A. - 375-376
Studies in Evolution and Biology. By Alice Bodington - 377-37S
Glimpses into Nature's Secrets. By Edward Martin - 378-379
Passing Thoughts of a Working Man By Herbert Cloudesdey 379
A Consideration of Gentle Ways. By Edward Butler - 379
Newspaper Reporting in olden time and to-day. By John Pen-
dleton ------ 379-380
Calendar of the State Papers relating to Ireland of the reign of
Elizabeth, 1692-1696. By Hans Claude Hamilton, Esq.,
F.S.A ------ 380-385
Ireland under the Tudors, with a succinct account of the Earlier
History, Vol. III. By Richard Bagwell, M.A. - 3S5-390
Hallcn's London City Registers— St. Botolph. Transcribed by
A. \V. Cornelius Hallen, M.A. . . . 300
Church Plate in Kent. By the Rev. W. A. Scott Robertson - 391-392
Gloucestershire Notes and Queries. Edited by the Rev. Beaver
H, Blacker, M.A. - - - - 392-393
The Scottish Antiquary, or Northern Notes and Queries. By the
Rev. A. W. Cornelius Hallen, M.A., F.S.A. (Scot.) - 393-394
Cyniru Fu— Notes and Queries relating to the past History of
Wales and the Border Counties, Vol. II. Edited by Geor<;e
H. Brierley ..... 394.
Western Antiquary — Note Book for Devon & Cornwall, Vol. II.
Edited by W. H. R. Wright, F.R. Hist. Soc. - 394-395
Notes and Gleanings. — A Monthly Magazine devoted chiefly to
subjects connected with the Counties of Devon & Cornwall,
Vol. II. Edited by W. Cotton, F.S.A. , and James Dallas,
F.L.S. ------ 395
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.
9
13
74
83
86
87
Plate I. Plans of Avcning Church - - to face p.
Plate II. „ „ -
Plate III View of Manor House, Clifford Chambers
Plate IV. Plans of Clifford Chambers Church -
Plate V. Chalice and Paten, Clifford Chambers, 1494-5 - „
Fig. 1. Knop or point of the feet of the Chalice - on page
Plate VI. Monumental Brass of Hercules Rainsford and
Elizabeth, his wife, at Clifford Chambers - to face p. 91
jPlate VII. Monumental Brass of Elizab. Marrowe, at Clif-
ford Chambers ....
>>
Fig. 2 Escutcheon of the Arms of the Rev. Francis
Hanbury Annesley - - - ou page
Sanctuary Knocker, St. Nicholas Church, Glouc.
*Fig. 3
*Fig. 4
*Fig. 5
Do. at Adel Church, Leeds
Do. at St. Gregory's, Church,
Norwich
Do. at All Saints' Church, York
Do. at Durham Cathedral
View of the Sanctuary, Holyrood -
Chalice at Combe Keynes, Somerset
Paten at Buckhorn, Weston, Somerset
Chalice at Sturminster Marshall, Somerset
Chalice at Wyley, Wilts -
Elizabethan Cup with Paten Cover, 1576
Chalice ami Paten from Cillingham
Cup at Wraxall, 1615-1620
Cup at Nosterton, 1714 -
View of Church of Ozleworth, Clouc.
N. Pier of Chancel Arch, Stoke Orchard, Glouc.
Base of North Pier of ,, ,,
Bell Turret of
Plate XVII. View of Stoke Orchard Church,
Plate XVIII View of Postlip Chapel
Chancel Arch do.
Base of Shaft of Arch, Postlip „
View of Sevenhampton Church
Interior of Sevenhampton Church Tower
Monumental Brass of John Camber -
92
100
131
131
*Fig. 6
*Fig. 7
"Plate VIII
t Plate IX.
fFig. 8
t Plate X.
fPlate XI.
fPlate XII.
fPlate XIII
fPlate XIV.
fPlate XV.
Plate XVI.
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fie. ii
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Plate XIX
132
132
132
to face p. 140
167
on page 167
to face p. 168
168
169
169
169
170
200
202
202
202
202
207
207
207
339
340
to face p. 343
on page
to face p.
on page
J A donation of £10 10s. was made to the Society by the Rev. F. H. Annesley in aid of
the printing and illustrating Sir John Maclean's " History of the Manor, &c, of Clifford
Chambers."
* The drawings for the illustrations thus marked were made by the Author.
t The engraved blocks for the illustrations thus marked were kindly lent by the Author
TRANSACTIONS OF THE
instol nub &lsmmhtB$xt %xcbmla§mxl Satittg
in 1889-90.
Proceedings at the Spring Meeting, held at Berkeley, on Wednesday.
29th May, 1889.
The Annual Spring Meeting of the Society was held this day at Berkeley,
where there was a very full attendance. Among those present were Mr. R.
V. Vassae- Smith, President of the Society, Gen. Hale, Dr. Beddoe, V.P., the
Revs. S. E. Baktleet and J. Mellaxd Hall ; Messrs. H. Adams, F. N.
Baynton, W. J. Brackenridge, B. Bonnor, H. W. Bruton, E. Bush, J.
B. C. Burroughs, C. H. Dansey, E. A. D'Argent, H. Derham, R. G.
Foster, H. Martin Gibbs, J. Hale, W. W. Hughes, H. Lloyd, P. D.
Prankerd, B. Matthews, C. Trusted, Rev. W. Bazeley, Hon. Secretary,
Mr. V. R. Perkins, Local Secretary for Dursley, and a large number of
ladies.
The various sections of the party met at Berkeley station, and at once
set out for
Berkeley Church,
where they were welcomed by the Revd. J. L. Stackhouse, the vicar,
who read a paper, in the course of which he said that one striking
peculiarity which immediately arrests the attention of the visitor is
that the tower is separated from the church itself. There are many
instances of separate towers, but few cases in which they are so far
apart from the church as at Berkeley. In this case the distance is
146 feet. The reason for this separation may be that a tower attached
to the church would have been full of peril to the Castle, as archers once
established on the top of such a tower would have commanded the Keep. In
fact the church itself proved to be a danger to the neighbouring fortress,
for it was through the church that the castle fell into the hands of the
Cromwellites. The contest was in the north porch ; the carnage was fright-
ful, the battle decisive for the beseigers, who immediately set to work to
put some small guns on the roof of the church, and the castle surrendered.
The present tower dates only from 1753, but it is a fair reproduction of
an older tower which stood on the same site. It contains six bells, of fine
tone and weight, which have just recently been re-hung and the tower itself
restored. The curfew still rings out its ponderous note of warning at the
hour of eight o'clock from Old Michaelmas day to the 25th of March. The
churchyard is blocked up by unsightly tombs, which are quaint in size
and shape, and still more quaint for the inscriptions upon them. He recom-
mended the members to look at an old altar-tomb near the north door,
Vol. XIV. b
•2 Berkeley Church.
to the memory of Thomas Pearce. On the west end of it, towards the path,
is the following inscription :
Here resteth the Body of
THOMAS PEARCE
who was five times
Mayor of this Town
who deceased the 25
of Feb 1665 statis 77.
And on the north side this :
Here lyeth Thomas peirce whom no man taught
Yet he in Iron. Brass, and Silver wrought,
He Jacks and clocks and watches (with Art) made
And mended too, when others' work did fade.
Of Berkeley five tymes Maior this Artist was
And yet this Maior, this artist, was but grasse,
When his owne watch was downe on the last day,
He that made watches, had not made a key
To wind it up ; but useless it must lie,
Until he rise againe no more to die.
And at another, whereon is an epitaph on Richard Pearce, the Earl of
Suffolk's jester, as under :
Here lies the Earl of Suffolk's Fool
Men call'd him Dicky Pearce ;
His folly served to make Folks laugh,
When wit and mirth were scarce.
Poor Dick alas ! is dead and gone
What signifies to cry
Dickys enough are still behind
To laugh at bye and bye.
Buried Juke 18th, 1728, aged 63.
The words, which are attributed to Dean Swift, are more witty than reverent.
The exterior of the church gives no idea of the beauty of the interior. The long
nave with its low roof, and the absence of a clerestory window on the north
side, give the visitor who approaches the church for the first time an im-
pression that the building is deficient in architectural beauty. Passing round
the exterior to the west end, he said, you will come suddenly on a grand
west front, with a doorway between two blank pointed arches ; the doorway
itself has an obtuse arch elaborately foliated, with a detached shaft of Pur-
beck marble on either side. The old oak door still bears the marks of the
battle which took place on 23rd Sept. 1645. There are perforations through
which the beseiged pointed their muskets at the attacking forces, and there
are also many marks of the hostile bullets of the besiegers. Above the
west door is a fine Early English window of five lights, which is one of
the principal features of the building. Passing into the interior it is im-
possible to enter this noble church without feeling that it is at once
beautiful in its structure, and reverent in its arrangements. The nave and
aisles belong to the 13th and 14th centuries, but the south doorway is a
very remarkable example of transition from Norman to Early English. The
font is a most interesting one of Norman workmanship ; three of the sides
Transactions for the Year 1889-9(1. X
bear marks of rough usage. At the screen there was an altar to St. Mary the
Virgin, to whom the church is dedicated, and the piscina of this altar
still remains, and j on the south side an altar to St. Andrew. These were
founded— the first by Thomas Lord Berkeley (the third of that name), and
the other by his widow. Their tomb is close by, with their effigies upon
it. It is well known that this Lord Berkeley was tried for the murder of his
Sovereign, and ultimately acquitted. Close to the screen, on the south side,
a Roman tile has been built into the wall, and bears the following letters,
< BCLVl7
which were scratched upon it whilst still soft, and, probably, indicate that
the situation had been occupied by the Tenth Cohort of the 6th Legion, but
this interpretation would seem to be very doubtful. The first letter is very
indistinct. On the south side of the chancel is the chapel used as the burial
place of the Berkeley family. The stone roof is of a most interesting charac-
ter, some of the carvings being very curious, especially one on a boss on the
south side, with the representation of a fox with his paws on the pulpit,
preaching to two geese, who are turning their heads away. The reredos
is a recent gift to the church by Lady Fitzhardinge, who has placed it
there as a memorial to her late father and mother. It represents the four
Evangelists and our Lord in the centre. The window above is in memory
of the great Dr. Jenner, who was buried in the chancel. The registers of
the church go back only to October, 1653, and the ancient ones have been
sadly torn and misused, so that they are scarcely legible.
The President conveyed the thanks of the members to Mr. Stack-
house for his paper, which, he said, had invested the subject matter with
a new interest. The company having inspected the various details of the
sacred edifice, a visit was paid to the vicarage, formerly the residence of
the famous Dr. Jenner, and one of the sights of which was a summer-house
where the doctor is said to have vaccinated his early patients. After lunch
at the Berkeley Arms Hotel, the party proceeded to
The Castle,
having got safely under shelter in the Great Hall just before one of many
heavy showers fell. They were received by the Hon. Elton Gifford, Lord
Fitzharddinge's nephew, Mr. J. Peter, his Lordship's agent, and the latter,
with the Revd. William Bazeley, acted as guides to the building. Many
documents of interest were exhibited by the former gentleman, and Mr.
Bazeley read notes on the History and Architecture of the Castle, collected
from the able and exhaustive article on the subject by Mr. G. T. Clark, of
Dowlais, F.S.A., on the occasion of the first visit of the Society to the
Castle in 1876, printed in the first volume of the Transactions.
On the conclusion of Mr. Bazeley's remarks, the party being \7ery
numerous, was divided into three sections, which were conducted by Mr.
Bazeley, and Mr. Vincent Perkins, Local Secretary to the Society at
Dursley, over the building, the chapel, King Edward II. 's reputed chamber,
and other objects of special interest in the building. Afterwards the mem-
bers were invited to ascend to the leads of the castie for the purpose of
B 2
4 The Castlk.
seeing from that elevation the view of the Vale of Gloucester and the sur-
rounding scenery. It was, however, somewhat disappointing, the rainy and
misty state of the atmosphere tended greatly to obscure the prospect, which,
from the inconsiderable height of the elevation, is not very extensive, and the
thick foliage of the neighbouring trees greatly intercepted the view. Even
the heights of the Cotswold hills, on the east, which bound the vale, could
only be imperfectly seen. Mr. Perkins pointed out the sites of the chief
places of interest, and read some interesting extracts from Leland, Camden,
and from Smith's Hundred of Berkeley, relative to the ancient privileges of
the Borough of Berkeley which was formerly a small port. These privileges
however, have long since ceased, and the borough has dissolved itself and
surrendered its municipal insignia to the Lord of the Castle.
The Meeting now terminated, aud the parties returned to the railway
station and proceeded to their respective homes, having, notwithstanding
the stormy weather, spent an enjoyable day.
A vexing Church, Glot-cesti:kphirf.
THE ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY OF AVENING
CHURCH, GLOUCESTERSHIRE.
An extract from the Report submitted to the Rector and Church-
wardens, September 1st, 1S88.
By R. HERBERT CARPENTER, F.S.A., & B. INGELOW, Architects.
There is not, so far as we know, any documentary evidence
connected with the history of the church in this place earlier
than the time of the Norman Conquest ; soon after which the
land called " Avening " was given by Queen Matilda who granted
this and other manors in Gloucester to the nuns of "La Trinite "
or the " Abbaye aux Dames," founded at Caen, in Normandy,
by her.
Previous to the Norman Conquest the Manor of Aveninge
formed parcel of the vast possessions of Brictric, the son of Alnod,
of the whole of which he was deprived by the Conqueror, who
conferred the greater portion upon his Queen.
The abbey had estates both in Gloucestershire and Dorset-
shire, and it is on record that the Abbess occasionally crossed
the sea to visit her English possessions.
There was in all probability a Saxon church' at Avening,
indeed the arches and lower windows of the tower are of such
an architectural character that they might well have formed
part of a building erected during the last period of the Saxon
rule. But after a careful consideration and comparison of the
various details, we are of opinion that the earliest portions of
the church were probably erected after the land came into
possession of the Nuns.
The Drawing (Plate I. fig. 1) shews the plan of the church as
it probably appeared until the end of the Norman period.
Whether the actual termination of the east end was circular
or square is uncertain, an apse, no doubt, was a very general
6 Transactions for the Year 1S89-90.
feature of this period, more particularly in Normandy, but in
this district of England the Normans frequently built square
east ends, as at Devizes, Elkstone, Iffley, and Oxford.
The chief entrance is on the north side of the nave ; it is
a very fine round-headed doorway, with twisted ornamental
shafts and carved capitals, of which latter, that on the left, has
the frequently found treatment of two horse-like animals, with a
human head common to both bodies : the other, or right-hand
capital, has very rich conventional foliage. The tympanum
enclosed by the moulded and chevron ornamented arch is, how-
ever, now quite plain, instead of being filled with sculptures or
figures from the " Bestiarium," as are so many of those described
by Mr. Romilly Allen in his "Christian Symbolism."
On the internal jamb is a curious sculptured stone, and it
has been suggested by Fosbroke that the subject represented
on it is Adam and Eve, symbolical of the Sacrament of Marriage,
but on careful examination it is evident the stone is not in its
original place, and that it has been cut at each end and used
as a jamb stone for the inside of a doorway inserted in the 15th
century. The portion of the stone which has been cut off from
the east end can be seen in the rough stone filling-in between
the outside jambs of the earlier and later doorways. The figures
are arranged in pairs, in three divisions, under rudely-cut arches
with pillars between each division, the figures are too mutilated
to be identified, but as two of them hold something like an apple,
they have been mistaken for Adam and Eve ; the figures are,
however, draped, so Fosbroke's suggestion falls to the ground.
This doorway should be compared with the south door at Wotton
Church, which much resembles it, and also with the very singular
south door at Beckford. The door in the south wall of the nave
was much more simply treated. It is now blocked up, but a part
of it is still visible externally ; its cill is about 28 inches above
the level of the floor inside, this was in order to suit the ground
outside, and is not uncommon in churches of this date.
The windows of this first church are very plain and round-
headed, with a wide internal splay ; three of them still remain,
Avkxixg Church, Gloucestershire 7
two above the north and south arches of the tower, and one
on the north side of the chancel. They are all very high up,
and are at about the same level, and probably traces of others
may yet exist on the south side beneath the wall plastering.
The fine eastern arch of the tower, the tower groining, and part
of that in the western bay of the chancel are of this date, and
of simple and massive character.
The eastern arch is not a tx'ue semi-circle, but depressed and
flattened at the crown, as in the case of the western arch of
Sherborne Abbey tower (this is a not uncommon treatment in
Norman times, the object aimed at was probably a better relative
proportion of the arch to its piers, when these latter were low
and the arch wide). It may be remarked that the inclination
southwards of the southern pier is too slight to account altogether
for the depression.
We may here observe that inside the chancel at the western
end of the south wall there is a square-headed doorway, now
blocked up, but formerly communicating with the circular stairs
leading to the upper stages of the tower ; from its position inside
the chancel it is not likely that this door was intended for bell
ringers only, and we suggest there was at Avening, as at Elkstone
and Leckhampton, and probably at S. Mary's, Wareham, a room
over the chancel used by the priest. At the east end of the
nave, on the south side, is a recessed segmental arch very richly
moulded, it has the characteristic chevron, and corresponds in
detail with the north doorway. The lower part of it is now
blocked up by pews, formerly, it is probable, there was an altar here.
It is worthy of note, that during the recent works at Minchin-
hampton, indications of a similar altar were discovered, with a
recess above it to receive a piece of sculpture, and Sir Henry
Dryden informs us that at the church of Langford, he found in a
corresponding position evidences both of an altar and of a
sculptured retable above it.
We have now to describe, and if possible account for, the
remains of a very curious ancient arrangement On the western
jamb of the north-west tower piers there can still be traced the
8 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
lines of an opening now filled up ; this, on the transept side, was
2ft. 6in., but on the tower side much narrower, its cill was about
3ft. 6in. above the floor, and close to it, on the angle of the great
tower buttress, and in the transept, is the chamfered jamb of a
doorway opening inwards to the west, the chamfer has a moulded
stop under the end of the former flat lintel head, and thus
resembles the blocked-up doorway in the west wall of the transept.
Now in point of date we consider this work is Norman, and thus
earlier than the north transept, and the position of the doorway
seems to preclude the idea of its having been the entrance to a
chapel. How, then, are these two openings to be accounted for 1
It is suggested that they may have belonged to a " recluse's cell "
attached to the church. We admit, of course, that these cells are
very uncommon, but we know at least of one such at Aldrington
in Sussex, where we restored and partially rebuilt the church.1
Here there was documentary evidence, not only of the existence
of the ceil (which was attached to the chancel), but also of the
" establishment " of the recluse by the Bishop of Chichester.
(There are also some remains of a cell at Walpole, St. Andrew's,
Norfclk, built against the western tower.) We may fairly believe,
therefore, that a somewhat similar arrangement existed at
Avening, and that the chamfered jamb was part of the outside
door of the cell of a recluse, and that the opening through the
pier was to enable him, or her, to join in the services of the
church. Subsequently when the cell was removed and the
transept built, the opening Avas blocked up for the sake of
security before the arch in the tower was constructed.
On the north side of the nave there is an arcade, much
mutilated, of two round arches opening into a short narrow aisle
or chapel. There is some evidence that this chapel was groined
probably with a plastered stone vault, without ribs, as over the
ambulatories of St. Bartholomew. Smithfield, but the alteration
of the chapel into an aisle in the 14th century necessitated the
removal of the vault. Possibly the blocked-up Norman doorway
now in the transept Avail formerly belonged to the chapel.
1 At Quinton, in this county, there is evidence of a similar cell (alluded
to by Sir John Maclean, F.S.A., Trans., Vol. XIII. p. 16S).
Plate 1
Fit> i
Avening Church.
t...r, ?.
J T_
f -.
DencUs Nc-rma*.:
Early EngUsii..
•' Ancient wails no*
iK*
Avenixcx Church, Gloucestershire. 9
There is one other feature which calls for remark ; it is high
up in the eastern wall of the porch, and is therefore only visible
in the parvise or room over. It is a low, square opening with
jambs, chamfered and stopped, and a flat lintel, resting on moulded
corbel stones. It is impossible to say positively either what it
was, or whether it is still in its original position, but as its cill
is nearly on the level, which would correspond with the top of
the groining (which there is reason to believe formerly existed
over the aisle), while its head is at about the same level as the
collars of the Norman rafters might have been, it may be in
its original position, and may have been used for access into the
space above the Norman vaulting. This opening may also have
been made use of when the parvise was erected, and possibly an
upper story in connection with it over the aisle.
The ancient Norman roofs of the nave and chancel were lower
in pitch than the present, so that their ridges would come below
the string-course under the still remaining belfry windows of that
period. These windows were doubtless repeated on the other faces
of the belfry stage, and the tower was probably surmounted by
a low lead-covered timber spire, such as still exists at Canterbury
Cathedral, and at the old parish church of Dover. We may here
note that through the timbers of the later roof the doorway (now
blocked up) can still be seen by which access was gained from the
tower to the space above the flat-boarded ceiling of the roof over
the nave.
The next stages in the history of the fabric are shewn on plan
[Plate I. fig. 2), which gives the church as it may have appeared
about the end of the 13th century. The first addition made was
a chapel on the north side of the chancel, opening into it by a
doorway, the jambs of which still remain. This building was
most likely a Lady Chapel ; it was probably destroyed by fire ;
its eastern foundations can still be traced, and its piscina (partly
formed out of a Norman window-head) still exists in the north
wall of the chancel, some ancient tiles, a piece of melted gold,
and other relics have been found within its area.
The porch, and the south and part of the north transept, also
belong to this period ; the latter were built as chapels, and to
]0 Transactions iok the Year 1SS9-9U.
connect them with the church arches were pierced in the tower
walls, that on the north being specially skilful in construction.
The porch of this period was doubtless only a one-storied
building, the roof being kept high enough to clear the beautiful
arch of the north doorway.
The plan (Plate I. fig. 3) shows the next important change in
the fabric.
This was the addition of the eastern bay of the chancel, a
work of much artistic merit; it is groined in stone, and the
vaulting ribs are so arranged as to harmonize with the lines and
proportions of the earlier vault, the piscina still remains, and
though mutilated, it is evident that originally it was a feature of
great beauty.
The object of this eastward extension is not absolutely certain,
but it seems probable that it was to provide a Lady Chapel in
place of that on the north side, which had been burnt down. The
east window is low and wide in its proportions ; it has now
completely lost its tracery, but we know that its centre light was
wider than the side lights, for the original cill remains with the
" stools " of the first mullions worked on it. These stools do not,
however, fit the mullions now standing on them, while the
insertion of a narrow piece of stone in the cill shows that the
window was widened soon after its erection, and it is possible
that some of the discarded ti-acery was put into the northern
window of the chancel, which last was itself an insertion after the
removal of the earlier Lady Chapel. The other side windows
differ in their details from either of these two, and they are
remarkably small and narrow in their lights. A similar one, now
blocked up by the vestry, existed in the western bay.
In the south wall of the Lady Chapel are some remains of the
jamb of the ancient doorway, used possibly by the owners of the
Lady Chapel and chancel as their private entrance. This door-
way existed as recently as 1829, and is shewn on a plan of that
date in possession of the Incorporated Church Building Society.
Two of the southern windows of the nave, and the west door-
way, were inserted in the 14th century, as well as the beautiful
Avexixi; Church, Gloucestershire. 11
northern and eastern windows of the north transept. [The ancient
tracery and mullions of the former window were removed and re-
placed with new in 1888, when the stained glass was put up.] No
doubt there was a west window of this period destroyed when the
wall was rebuilt in its present form. The fine roof of the nave is in
very good condition, and, excepting the loss of the carved bosses
at the intersection of the ribs, it has suffered but little change.
It is considerably higher in pitch than the roof which it replaced,
and consequently blocks the lower part of the Norman belfry
windows before referred to.
The transept roofs were altered in the 1 7th century, anciently
they were of what is termed the " trussed rafter type," but the
old cross ties or bi'aces have been taken away ; these, however,
could easily be replaced, as the mortices still remain to show
where they were framed in.
The roof over the chancel was also reconstructed in the 17th
century, and is lower in pitch than the ancient one of the 14th
century, as is shewn by the old stone water-table of that date,
on the then rebuilt eastern face of the tower.
The northern chapel of the nave was rebuilt, and an arch was
cut through into the transepts, and of this date a mutilated two-
light window still exists, there is also a richly-moulded wall plate
carried on corbels, which were let into the irregular face of the
nave wall after the removal of the groining. The construction
of this roof is now hidden under plaster, but it probably continued
down the slope of that of the nave.
In the 15th century the two buttresses on the southern side
of the nave were built to strengthen the inclining wall, and the
window between them was inserted ; this alteration involved the
block ing-up of the old south doorway.
At about the same time new stonework was inserted within
the Norman north doorway, and another story or " parvise " was
added to the porch ; this story was probably a priest's chamber ;
the floor was formed by beams and joists, now removed ; there is
nothing to show how the stairs to this room were arranged, but
certain peculiarities in the walls give reason to think that there
12 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
may have been at this time an upper story over the north aisle ;
and that from this story the parvise may have been entered by
means of the ancient opening described before, while the upper
story itself was reached by stairs or by a ladder, arranged per-
haps in connection with those to the rood-loft hereafter described.
It is also possible that steps were contrived inside the porch
on the west side (as at S. Martin's, Wareham), leading up into
the parvise. With regard to the suggested upper story to the
aisle, it is not a little remarkable that there is an example of one
at Bishop's Cleeve, near Cheltenham, and that here too it is
connected with the parvise of the porch.
It would be very interesting to find out whether there are
traces of a similar arrangement in any other of the Gloucester-
shire churches (at Laycock, Wilts, there is an annexe to the south
porch of two or three stories).
The belfry stage of the tower was considerably altered, and the
two upper battlemented stages were added, the general proportion
and effect of this work are good, but the detail is somewhat
inferior.
It may be noted that inside the belfry there are large holes,
apparently for beams, as if these stories had been originally
divided by a floor. The work of this period was probably executed
by the great Convent of Sion, to whom the property, forfeited to
the Crown as that of a foreign convent, had been granted by
Henry V.
With these last works the mediaeval history of the fabric may
be said to have closed, and we pass to the consideration of the
ancient ritual arrangements, so far as they can be discerned or
reasonably conjectured.
In the first place it is obvious that there must formerly have
been a rood-screen and loft across the east end of the nave, for
the door leading to the latter still exists in its north wall just
above the arcade of the side aisle. The cutting away and
mutilation of the pillars, capitals, and arch-mould of the western
tower arch were no doubt occasioned by its construction ; but
these defects would, of course, be hidden by the woodwork of the
Atoning Church, Gloucestershire. 13
screen and its projecting gallery. It is not possible at present
to determine how the stairs were contrived, although what may
have been a portion of them still exists, formed of solid oak, but
further investigation may throw light on this difficult and
interesting question.
With regard to the altars, there was one, as already observed,
at the east end of the nave on the south side, but we have as yet
found no traces of any ancient steps or levels to guide us as to
the position of the high altar. If, however, the eastern bay of
the present chancel was at one time a Lady Chapel, there would
be some form of screen separating it from the chancel of the
parish church, and against this screen or retable on its western
side the high altar would stand, while doors in the screen would
give access to the Lady Chapel, which could also be entered,
without first going through the church, by means of the ancient
door on the south side.
The level of the footpace of the Lady Chapel altar may be
inferred from the height of the ancient piscina.
The General Plan of the Chmxm as it now exists, and indi-
cations of the alterations made from time to time, are shewn in
in Plate II.
1 See Mr. R. Paul's paper "Notes in Gloucestershire."
14 Transactions for the Yeak 1889-90.
TESTA DE NEVILL
RETURNS FOR COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER.
No. 8.
By Sir HENRY BARKLY, K.C.B., G.C.M.G.
The Return at page 82 headed " De Testa de Nevill," as if copied
from the original Record thus designated, though printed last,
ranks next in order of time, if my surmise x be correct that the
payments from Religious Houses, credited at its close, were made
on account of the Aid of 1235.
It begins with a list of tenants by Serjeanty, liable, as is known,
to oontribute on such occasions. In the case of the first eleven, the
christian and surname alone are noted, without allusion to office,
or locality and extent of holding. As the families referred to,
however, are, as will be seen from the following enumeration, con-
nected with the Forest of Dean (a single exception perhaps
occurring), there can be little doubt that we have here the names
of the officials x employed in its custody and remunerated by the
occupation of a certain portion thereof by serjeanty, viz. —
1. " Robert Erchemband holds by serjeanty. "
The family of this name was chiefly connected with Cirences-
ter, where Richard Erkenband is given in a subsequent Return as
holding under a serjeanty in 1249, and where Geoffrey Erkenbald
had an estato in 38th Henry III.,3 three years later. Rudder
expresses an opinion that the latter was the descendant of the
"freeman" mentioned in Domesday as holding two hides in
that township " for which he did service to the sheriff throughout
1 Trans., Vol. XIII., p. 352.
2 Bigland gives a long list of the Wardens, Verderers, Woodmen, &c. ,
in the reign of Henry III.; whilst a document published by Rudder shows
that in the time of Edward I. the forest was divided into ten Bailiewicks,
each under an hereditary guardian.
3 Rudder's Gloucestershire, p. 355.
Testa de Nevill, 15
all England. I can trace no connection with Dean, but they
must have spread at an early date through the county, for in
1128 a " Robert son of Erkenbald " gave half a hide of land in
Condicote (near Stow) to St. Peter's Abbey.1
2. Thomas de Blacen by serjeanty.
Evidently "Blakeney,"' which was one of the Bailiwicks of
the Forest. Thomas de Blakeney was a juror for the Liberty of
Dean Forest in 1248,2 and in the reign of Edward I. he, or his
son of the same name, held of the King in capite.3
3, Ralph Avenel by serjeanty.
Though of good standing in Normandy at the date of the
Conquest, the Avenels do not appear as Crown tenants in Domes-
day. They however acquired lands in England during the reign
of Henry I. principally in the Isle of Wight, then an Earldom
of the De Redvers family. Probably through the same connection
they became prominent in Gloucestershire 4 not long afterwards,
for we find a Ralph Avenel holding from 1167 to 117-1 in Sand-
hurst, a manor in which the Earls of the Isle had an interest
subsequently.5 Another Ralph, presumably his son, obtained in
1200 continuation of a weekly market 6 in his vill of Bicknor, one of
the Bailliewicks of Dean Forest, which constituted the Serjeanty
above referred to. This Ralph died in 1223, and was succeeded by
his son William, who held Bicknor till his death in 1226, when it
passed to his daughter.7 Either, therefore, the name of Ralph is
inserted by mistake for his sons, or this List of Serjeanties is of
earlier date than I conjectured.
1 Cartulary, Vol. I., p. 124.
- Trans. Bristol and Glouc. Arch. Society. Vol. X., p. 301.
3 Rudder's Gloucestershire, p. 35.1.
4 In the Carucage of 1221, in Cirencester Hundred, a vill of Avenel held
by William de Marrys, appears to suggest the idea that the family in that
county was of local origin, but I believe it to be a mistranscription of
A vening.
5 Vide Retain 1, Xo. IS, Testa de Xevill.— Trans. Bristol and Glouc.
Arch. Society, Vol. XII., p. 264.
6 Close Roll, 2nd John.
7 Vide Pedigree of the Avenels of Gloucestershire, by Sir John Maclean,
Appendix to his Paper on the Manor of Bicknor. — Trans. Bristol and Glouc.
Arch. Society, Vol. IV., p. 318,
16 Transactions for the Year 1888-9.
4. William, son of Geoffrey de Dene, by the same.
No doubt the William de Dene, who was one of the jurors for
the Liberty of the Forest in 1248, and died seized of the manor
of Great Dean, within the Forest of Dean in 1259.1
5. Robert de Aubemarle, by serjeanty.
The Gloucestershire family of this name was apparently an
offshoot of that in Devonshire, which sprung from Robert de
Albamarla, who held a score of manors in the latter county at
Domesday. On the Pipe Roll of 17th Hen. III. (Glouc.) Willia?n
de Albamara rendered account of 10 marks for having sasine of
the land of Rowarton (i.e. Ruardean, one of the forest bailiewicks),
which his father Robert held from the King by serjeanty. This
again seems to shew that the list is of earlier date than the rest
of Return 8, but the explanation may be that the manor was not
transferred to the son's name till his relief was paid. William had a
younger brother of the name of Robert, whose daughters succeeded
to Ruardean on their father's death in 40th Henry III.,2 but it is
scarcely probable that this Robert, junior, should have inherited
within the space of two years.
6. Godfrey de Boxclive by serjeanty.
I have failed to trace the connection of this family with any
particular bailiewick, but it resided near the Forest, for the jurors
of Blideslaw Hundred in 1221 make a presentment as to William
de Boxclixe, who had been slain, and James and Martin de
Boxclive, are pledges for the prosecution.3
7. John de Lascy, by serjeanty.
Orde Lacu, as printed in Return No. 11, doubtless more cor-
rectly, as one of the Bailiewicks of the Forest was so called. In
1221 the jurors present the " Serjeanty of the Lake "as in the
King's hands, and in the custody of John de Monmouth,4 which
1 See Sir John Maclean's History of the Manors of Dene Magna and
Abenhall, and a pedigree of Dene and descendants. — Trans. Bristol & Glouc.
Arch. Society, Vol. VI., pp. 123-209. Inq. p.m, 43rd Hen.III. No. 18.
2 See Sir John Maclean's History of Ruardean. — Trans. Bristol & Glouc.
Arch. Society, Vol. VIII.
3 Pleas of the Crown for the County of Glouc. in 5th Henry III., edit.
F. W. Maitland.
4 Pleas of the Crown for the County of Gloucester, 5th Henry III. —
Edit. F. W. Maitland.
Testa de Nevill. 17
is continued by an entry in the carucage of that year under the
heading "Liberty of the Forest of Dean."1 William de Lacu
was a juror for that Liberty in 1248. Nicholas de Lacu held in
the time of Edw. I., when the manor was known as "the Lea."2
8. John Blund, by serjeanty.
I presume a scion of the Blunts of Aure, who were better
known by the latter surname. John Blund held in St. Briavels in
1248, and was among the jurors for the Liberty of the Forest of
Dean in the same year.
9. Elias Rudele, by serjeanty.
He no doubt took his name from Rodley, in Westbury
Hundred. Ralph de Rodley attended the assizes in 1221 as one
of the verderers (viridarii) to present complaints from the Forest,3
and there was one of the same name connected with it in the reign
of Edward I.4
10. Walter, son of Walter, by serjeanty.
Doubtless the then head of the Aure family, who having, ap-
parently, been a minor in 1221, had succeeded since, both to the
Ferm of Aure and to the twenty shillings' worth of land in that
manor which was held by the serjeanty of waiting in the King's
chamber.5
11. Richard de Blechesdon, by serjeanty.
This family derived its surname from a vill in Westbuiy
Hundred.6 Baderon de Blechesdon held it in 4th John,7 and
Richard, probably his son, was one of the verderers who repre-
sented the Forest in 1221.8 From this point, as will be seen,
information is added in each case in the Return as to the nature
of the service. In the three first, vizt. —
1 Testa de Nevill, p. 79b.
2 Rudder's History.
3 Pleas of the Crown for the County of Glouc, 5th Hen. III.
4 Rudder's History.
5 See Return 1 , where this Walter's grandfather is referred to as Walter
Blund of Aure. —Trans. Bristol & Glouc. Arch. Society, Vol. XII., p. 287.
6 Gloucestershire Carucage of 1221, Testa de Nevill, p. 79.
7 Pedes Finium in Anno.
8 Pleas of the Crown for the County of Gloucester, 5th Henry III.
Vol. XIV. c
18 TRANSACTION'S FOR THE Vk.AR 1889-90.
12. Peter de Kingeshome, by serjeanty of keeping the King's door.
13. Osbert de Grava, by archery — land in Upton.
14. Heirs of Isaac de Stradewy — by 100 arrows
It is worth noting that the entries repeat in an abbreviated
form those on Return No. I1 (marked likewise as from "Testa de
Nevill "), no allusion being made to the changes of name in the
later holders of the serjeanty as indicated by Return 3. These
have already been fully described.
15. Hugh de Kylpecke holds Little Tainton by serjeanty — of which
the Canons of Stodleye :? hold half a virgate from him in alms.
In Domesday, " Tatinton " (identified with the above manor)
was held by William, son of Norman, Hugh's progenitor. It was
" free land," and worth 20s., but a virgate lay on the Forest (of
Dene) and paid 12d. William's land in Dene was held free on con-
dition of keeping that forest, but Little Taynton was held by his
descendant by the serjeanty of keeping the Hay of Hereford, that
is the woodland around that city."4
16. Richard de la Mare — holds a certain portion of land by the
serjeanty of keeping the King's door.
" Many others are concerned in the same service through him."
The Gloucestershire portion of the lands, held in virtue of this
serjeanty was at Wenrich, in Slaughter Hundred. It appears to
have been already alienated and subdivided, but fuller particulars
on the subject will be given hereafter, Avhen 1 come to discuss
Return No. 11.
17. John Archer, two carucates in Stoke by the service of archery.
According to a Return of the time of King John, to be found
in the " Testa," at page 42, under Worcestershire, John the Archer
held five hides in Stoke of the King, and the King from the Bishop
(of Worcester) by the serjeanty of archery. Originally, no doubt,
1 Vide Trans. Bristol & Glouc. Arch. Soc, Vol. XII., p. 288-9.
2 Vide Ditto, Vol. XII., p. 299 and 302.
3 Hugh was in ward to William de Cantilupe, patron of Stodley Priory,
until his coming of age in 1216. He died in 1244, when his estates went to
his two daughters.
4 Plac. Coron, 32nd Hen. III., Rot. 10 in dorso.
Testa df. Nevill. 19
the service had to be performed in person, but it had resolved
itself into the obligation of finding a bowman for forty clays to
follow the King's army within the four seas of England : in time
of war.
18. John Blund, lands in Walcworth by the serjeanty of carrying
writs (Brevia).
Otherwise Walsworth, a hamlet in King's Barton, which seems
to have been farmed by the bearers of writs when Gloucester
was a Royal residence. Ralph de Walsworth held 2 virgates there
by this service in 53rd Hen. III., and Adam de Arderne 1 virgate
there, later.2 Probably John Blund was predecessor of one or other.
After this entry comes a note, apparently inserted by the
copyist, to the effect that " In other counties through the fore-
going Inquisitions nothing is found as to this Inquisition concern-
ing serjanties," 3 meaning, I take it, that he has not found by the
Returns of the Aid of 1235 for other counties any notice of
assessments on serjeanties ; — a statement which, so far as I have
searched, is accurate.
The copyist then proceeds without comment to make the
twelve entries as to amounts assessed upon the religious houses
in Gloucestershire for the same Aid, beginning with "The Prior
of Ashley," and ending with " The Abbot of St. Augustine's,
Bristol," as already cited in my former paper.4 As these do not
require to be repeated, I pass to
RETURN No. 9,
" Aid of the Prelates granted to the King against his crossing
into Gascony in the 26th year of his reign."
This is an extract of so much as relates to the County of
Gloucester, of a Roll bearing this title, but including the whole
of England, which is still preserved at the Record Office.5
1 Vide Inq. ad quod damnum, taken at Gloucester 25th Edw. III. (2nd
Nov. 1350), Calendar No. 47.
2 See Fosbroke, Vol. I., p. 23S.
3 " In aliis comitatibus per inquisitiones premissas, nicliil p inquisionem
istam invenitur de Serjanterijs."
4 Trans. Bristol & Glouc. Arch. Society, Vol. XIII., p. 354.
5 See a Paper by me in the Genealogist, Vol.V., No. 16, on the mode in
which the Testa de Nevill was compiled.
C 2
20 TRANSACTION'S FOR THE YEAR 1889-90.
Henry III. having, in February, 1242, been refused a subsidy
by his nobles, raised such funds as he could, and sailed for his
Continental dominions after Easter, with a view of supporting
his step-father, Hugh Count de Marche, in his revolt against the
French King.1
The Aid above referred to was in all probability not granted
until after his departure, for the Lords Spiritual had concurred
with the Lords Temporal in this refusal, though they gave way
subsequently, at the instance it may be inferred of the Archbishop
of York,- who was left Guardian of the Kingdom. It would seem,
however, as if in lieu of a regular assessment, each prelate had
agreed merely to give as much as his House could afford. Only
eight indeed contributed in Gloucestershire, vizt. —
1. Abbot of Winchcumbe
2. Abbot of Gloucester
3. Abbot of Cirencester
4. Prior of Lanthony ....
5. Abbot of Tewkesbury ....
6. Prior of Newent ....
7. Prior of Deerhurst -
8. Abbot of St. Augustine's, Bristol -
and it will be found by a comparison of these amounts with those
in Return No. 8, that no uniform ratio existed between the con-
tributions of the same religious houses at the two periods. Thus
in the first case, the amount payable in 1242 was half as much
more than in 1235. In the third, fifth, and eighth cases it was
precisely the same. In the second and the seventh it was half ;
whilst in the sixth it was three-fifths, and in the fourth, three-
eighths only. The Priories of Ashley, Horsley and Beckford,
which appear in the list of 1235, are omitted. The result is that
the total was but 166 marks = £110 8s. 8d. instead of as before
273£ marks = 189 2s. 3d.
1 Matthew Paris, Vol. IV.
2 Walter de Gray, who had held that dignity from the commencement of
the reign, and was a man of great influenee. The Archbishopric of Canter-
bury was in the King's hand.
15
marks
50
)>
30
«j
15
j>
20
)>
6
?>
10
>>
20
9>
Testa de Nevjll. 21
The inequalities, moreover, in the Gloucestershire payments
are trifling compared with those discoverable in a supplementary
Return printed among "Returns from Divers Counties " almost
at the end of the Testa (p. 412) under the heading : " In Account
of the Aid for the crossing of the King into Gascony," wherein, to
take Lincolnshire, the Prior of Bakemere is entered for one mark,
and the Prior of St. Swithin comes next for two hundred ; whilst
the Prior of Parva Lude (Louth) gives a single palfrey, against
three palfreys given by the Abbot of Fountains, Yorkshire.
Altogether the accounts are more like those of a " Benevolence "
than an Aid levied in the ordinary manner. Another sign too is
that payments in several instances were not made at the Ex-
chequer in the usual form, but are specially noted as having been
handed to Peter Chacepore (the King's clerk) in the wardrobe.
RETURN No. 10.
Although the Return which follows No. 9 has been headed (pro-
bably by the Exchequer copyist of the 14th century) as if it related
to serjeanties,1 its proper title is evidently that set out lower
down.
" Receipts of the Scutage of Gascony from the Bailiwick of
Cirencester," the latter phrase meaning the " Seven Hundreds 2"
farmed by the abbey of that place from the Crown.
After an inglorious campaign, ending in a truce for four years
with King Louis, Henry took up his winter quarters at Bordeaux,
where the expense of supporting his troops was so heavy, that he
had recourse to the usual expedient of taxing his tenants in
capite at home. Rapin, the only English historian who adverts
to the matter, states at the commencement of his narrative for
1243,3 that the archbishop, under orders from his Royal master,
obtained of the parliament a scutage of 20s. on every knight's fee.
Bishop Stubbs,4 in the absence of evidence as to parliamentary
1 The primary heading : " Serjantie mutate in Servicia Militaria." Hen.
de Monenue 1 am partem Wills Wyberd 1 am partem " must have been
copied by mistake from some Return not now extant.
s Vizt., Cirencester, Bradley, Britwoldsbury, Bisley, Rapsgate, Langtree
and Whitston.
3 Vol. III., p. 76. * " Select Charters."
22 Transactions for the Year 1SSJ-90.
sanction, suggests that the tax was exacted by an exercise of the
Royal prerogative alone.1 This accords with the charge of
"extortion" brought against the King by Matthew Paris, from
whose Chronicle it may be further gathered that the order was
issued at Michaelmas, 1242, and that not 20, but 40, shillings per
fee was the amount to be collected.- The latter assertion is
corroborated by this Return (No. 10), in which all payments
credited are at the higher rate, another instance being thus
afforded where the "Testa de Kevill " serves to clear up a doubt-
ful historical point.
Whether the circumstance of these payments being accounted
for through the Abbot of Cirencester, instead of by two lay
collectors as in 1235, indicates that the influence of the church
was as far as possible employed in collecting an obnoxious impost,
there is not evidence to decide, this being the sole Return in the
Testa for a particular county. This may perhaps be attributable
to the fact that such accounts must in the main have been but a
1 That Henry had resolved to adopt this course even before he left
England is clearly shown by his having on 1st May issued writs at West-
minster granting permission to the nobles who were to accompany him, to
levy a scutage on their own tenants. The Roll on which these writs were
engrossed is in the Record Office. It is entitled " Scutagium concessum ad
transfretandum domini Regis Henrici filii Johannis in Vasconiani — anno
regni ipsius Regis H. xxvi., militibus subscriptis qui cum rege venerunt. "
Read between the lines it throws light in many ways on the situation. He
styles his brother Richard for example not only Earl of Cornwall, but Earl of
Poictou, the cause of his quarrel with France, whilst the disinclination of
the Baronage to espouse that quarrel is shown by the small number who
went (77 in all), and by the length of time which elapsed before some of
them followed him, — Simon de Montfort not getting his writ until the 25th
June, and others as late as the 28th August at Bordeaux, when the campaign
was over ! It need only be added that the concessions are expressly stated
to be " de dono regis," without allusion to council or parliament. The last,
however, to Geoffrey le Despenser, for a fee which he held in ward, is said
to be granted " at the time when it was provided that a scutage should
be given in the Kingdom of England," which almost looks as if the Royal
edict had eventually received some sort of sanction.
- After a paragraph in which the above date is mentioned, the Cotton
MSS. has eodem tempore scutagium per totam Angliam (viginti) solidos de
(scuto) Rex Anglie sibi fecit extorqueri," — the words between brackets
being blank in the text, but added in the mai'gin ; whereas the MSS. in
the library of Corpus Christi College states the amount as " tres marcas,"
which is clearly correct.
Testa de Nevill. 23
repetition of the collection made at the same rate in 1235, not,
however, without appreciable differences, as shewn by a Return
for the County of Kent at page 416 in the Testa, which is headed :
" These are in the Aid for marrying the King's sister, but not in
the Scutage of Gascony."
It should perhaps be added that the Return for Divers Coun-
ties, at p. 412, already alluded to, might be taken to prove that
there ivere lay collectors, since it begins by naming Sir Robert
Passelew, and Nigel the Clerk, as rendering account for Hamp-
shire, to the extent of £14 Is.; but the former was the King's sub-
Treasurer, and the latter, no doubt, an Exchequer official, so that
they probably were acting ministerially ; whilst as regards the
other counties noted in the margin, no collectors are named. In
fact the lay contributors mentioned seem to have been for the
most part custodes of the lands of minors, subject, of course, to
pressure from the Crown.
Proceeding after this digression to an examination of the Return
it will be found, comformably with its second title, to contain a list
of the names of certain sub-feofees in the Hundreds around Ciren-
cester, with the sums l'eceived from each. The entries run as
follow : —
1. From Ralph de Leche for a whole fee in Eastlech of the fief1
of the Earl of Gloucester, 40s.
Ralph de Leche was in 1248 one of the jurors2 of Brit-
woldesbury, in which this fee was situated, and in 1285 a person
of the same name, perhaps his son, held it of Herbert de St.
Quinton, and Herbert of the Earl of Gloucester.3 In 1346, John
de Leeche is said to hold the lands and tenements in Eastleach
and Twining, which had been Ralph's, as the fourth part of a fee.4
2. From Richard de Baggindon for half a fee, and the twelfth
part of one fee in Baggindon, of the fief of Roger de Chandos,
23s. 4d.
1 I translate feodum " fief " when used in this wider sense, in order to
avoid confusion.
2 Trans. Bristol & Glouc. Arch. Society, Vol. X., p. 305. —A Gloucester-
shire Jury List of the 13th century.
3 Idem , Vol. XL, p. 143— Kiiby's Quest.
* Idem., Vol. X., p. 2S3.-A.id for Knighting the Black Prince.
24 Transactions fok the Year 1883-90.
The subinfeudation of the Baggindons in the manor from
which they derived their surname, has been already mentioned in
the notice of Roger de Chandos in a previous paper.1 It lasted
upwards of a century longer, for in the Return for Cirencester
Hundred in 1346, a Richard de Baggyndon held the half and
twelfth part of a fee there 2 which his predecessor of the same
name had done in the time of Edward I.
3. From Cecilia de Evereus and Galiena de Turvill for two fees
in Estlech of the rief of Walter de Lacy, £i.
It may be surmised that these ladies were sisters, and that as
the manor they held conjointly in Britwoldesbury Hundred was
known as Eastleach-'iWvi/e, — the former had changed her name
through marriage. The two fees thus held of Walter de Lacy
are apparently those for which Henry le Fleming answered in the
Aid of 1235,8 and it might have been assumed that they were at.
that date in ward to him together with the heiresses, were there
not circumstances tending to prove that the latter had long ere
that passed their minority. As regards the first, the fact of the
manor being styled " Lecche Cecilia" in the Carucage of 1221,
looks as if she were in possession even then, and this idea is
corroborated by finding that about the middle of the century she
had a grown up son, Nicholas,4 to share her inheritance, which ex-
tended into several counties. I imagine that she was the second
wife of Stephen d'Evei'eux,5 the name of whose son and heir,
William, often stands next to hers in these Returns.
Galiena de Turvile seems to have been of age still earlier, for
so far back as 1213 she transferred by fine 6 the manor of Norton
to her sister Dionisia, widow of William de Berkeley of Cobberly,
who is known to have been a daughter of Robert de Turvile."
1 Idem., Vol. XIII., p. 340.
- Mem., Vol. X., p. 281.
3 Idem., Vol. XIII., p. 327.
4 Vide Testa de Nevill, p. 414. I am not sure of the date of the Return
in which he is mentioned. Possibly it may not be earlier than 1260.
5 Trans. Bristol & Glouc. Arch. Society, Vol. XIII., 339.
6 Pedes Finium, Glouc, 15th John, No. 66.— Though bound up with the
Fines of that county, I believe it to relate to Chipping Norton, Oxfordshire.
7 Vide Cal. Inq. p.m., 27 th Henry III., No. 26.— On Giles de Berkeley.
Testa de Nevill. 25
Galiena was also a joint-tenant of two fees in Wilts, under John
fitz Geoffrey, and held in capite the vill of Hosington, in Hants,
as a tenth of a fee in which Jordan la Ware had been sub-enfeoffed.
4. From Gilbert de Schipton for one fee in Schipton of the fief of
William the Monk (Monachus), 40s.
This was not the knight's fee which William le Moine held by
serjeanty in the same vill, but another held by military service,
wherein the family whose surname was taken from it, as above
shewn, had long before been sub-enfeoffed. Probably indeed they
descended from Rumbald, the sub-tenant who held 10 hides plus
1 hide in Seipetune at the time of the Domesday Survey, for it
was a Gilbert, son of Rumbald, who in 1199 fined 100s. to be
recognised by Robert le Moyne as feoffee of the two knights' fees
held of him at Scipton.1
This arrangement was so far modified in 1210 that Gilbert
agreed to resign the advowson of the church of Scipton to Ralph
le Moyne, who thereupon diminished the service by half a knight's
fee, and also gave up a virgate of land and a messuage situated
between their respective manor houses.2
When and why the service was further reduced to that of a
single knight does not appear, but it was no mere temporary
concession, since in 1285 it was found that William le Moyne
held in Skipton by the serjeanty of being the King's larderer, and
that Gilbert de Skipton held one knight's fee in the same vill,
from the aforesaid William.3 The history of the serjeanty will be
traced when we come to Return No. 11.
5. From William de Mara for two and a half fees, and the third
part of a fee in Rindcoinbe, Cerney, Kalemundesdon, and
Truesbiri, of the fief of the Earl of Gloucester, 113s. 4d.
Rendcombe and North Cerney, of which latter Calmesden is
a hamlet, are in the Hundred of Rapsgate ; belonged to the
same owner at Domesday ; and descended together afterwards.
1 Pedes Finium, Glouc, 1st John, No. 22.
2 Idem., 12th John, No. 65.
3 Kirby's Quest— Hundred de Langtre. — Trans. Bristol & Glouc. Arch.
Society, Vol. XL, p. 152.
og Transactions for the Year 1SS9-90.
Trewesbury, in the parish of Cotes, Cirencester Hundred, may
have constituted the third of a fee spoken of ; but if so, the Earl's
small manor in Cotes must have been reckoned with it, for it was
only half a hide. Both had belonged to Gislebert fitz Turold at
Domesday, and usually passed as one holding.
With regard to William de Mara, the great fief of Mara in
the Commune of Antretot, in Normandy, had given a surname to
its lords before the Conquest, and the Sire de la Mare is included
by Wace among those who fought at Hastings, The name, how-
ever, does not appear among the tenants in capite at the time of
the Great Survey, although there is reason to infer that William
son of Norman, the ancestor of the lords of Kilpeck, was entitled
to bear it.1 What is certain is that before 1123 Walter of
Gloucester, father of Milo, afterwards Earl of Hereford, gave to
William de Mara, his nephew, two fees in Little Hereford ; 2 and
further that in 1165, Robert de Mara, who can be shown to have
been that William's successor, held ten fees of William Earl of
Gloucester.3 The latter must have included those here mentioned
in Rendcombe, for he gave lands in that vill to Bruern Abbey, co.
Oxon ; a donation which was confirmed, and probably enlarged,
by another William de Mara, presumably Robert's son, between
1171 and 1183.4
The William de Mara of this Return was, of course, of a still
later generation. His descendants continued to hold the same
manors under the Earls of Gloucester for upwaixls of a hundred
years after its date, for in 1285,5 a William de la Mare is found
holding Rendcombe of the Earl as three fees, as also Trewsbury
as the tenth part of a fee ; whilst in 1346 6 Thomas de la Mare
and his tenants paid the aid for two knights' fees in Rendcombe.
6. From William de Lesseberg for one knight's fee, in Lesseberge,
of the fief of William de Kaines, 40s.
1 Vide Roll of Battle Abbey, by the Duchess of Cleveland, Vol. II. , p. 192.
2 Vide Ancient Charters, edited by J. Horace Round, Esq., part 1, No. 11.
3 Liber Niger, Vol. I., p. 160.
4 Ancient Charters ut supra, No. 45.
6 Kirby's Quest. — Trans. Bristol & Gloucester Arch. Society, Vol. XI.
s Aid for Knighting the Black Prince, ditto, Vol. X.
Testa de Nevill. 27
The William de Kavnes mentioned in Return No. 1 l as hold-
ing two knights' fees of the king (John), died in 6th Henry III.,2
leaving his son and heir of the same name a child, in ward at
first to the Bishop of Salisbury, but later, apparently, to Simon de
Montfort, to whom an order regarding him was addressed in 19th
Henry III.3 His minority accounts for the absence of the second
William de Kaynes from the list of those who paid the aid of
that year, but he had clearly come of age before 1242. As the
Kaynes family resided in Somersetshire, their sub-feofees at Las-
borough seem to have become practically independent, An earlier
William de Lasborough had bestowed a hide out of it on St.
Augustine's, Bristol,4 and the one here mentioned, who was appoint-
ed Sheriff* of Gloucestershire in 1255, obtained in the following
year a grant of free warren 5 over his demesne lands in the manor,
the existence of his overlord not being even alluded to. In the
Inquisition on his death, however, in 1260, he is stated to have
held a fee in Lasseberge worth twenty marks per annum of Sir
William de Kaynes by the service of one knight.6 His only
daughter and sole heiress, Agatha, then twenty years of ago, was
married to Henry, son and heir of William cle Dene, which Henry
is recorded in Kirby's Quest as holding the fee of the heirs of
Robert de Kaynes." Another William de Dene succeeded, after
whose death in 1310 s a third had livery of his inheritance in
Dene on 14th October in the last named year. This William
died in 1319 9 leaving two daughters and coheirs, Isabel five years
old, and Joan aged only one month, whose wardship and marriage
fell to the King,10 as the lands in Great Dean were held of him in
capite. The Manor of Lasborough was found on the same occasion
to have been held by William of Hugh le Despencer, senior. By
what means its overlordship had been wrested from the De Kaynes
1 Testa de Nevill.- Trans. Bristol & Glouc. Arch. Society, Vol. XII. p. 267.
- Excerpta e Rot. Fin., Vol. I., p. 82.
3 Excerp' e Rot. Finium, Vol. I., p. 275.
* Fosbroke, Vol. I., p. 408.
5 See Charter of Inspeximus on Patent Roll, 4th Rich. II.
6 Inq. p. m. 45th Hen. III. No. 20.
7 See Trans. Bristol & Glouc. Arch. Soc, Vol. X.. p. 152.
8 Writ of " Diem Clausit Extremum " dated 7th Edw. II. Rot. Fin.
9 Inq. p. m. 12th Edw. II. No. 31.
10 Ibid.
2S Transactions tor the Year, 1889-90.
family, I have not discovered,1 but this had, apparently, been
done with the connivance of the sub-feoffee, since it is recorded 2
that Hawise, wife of Robert de Kaynes, had, " as Lad)' of the
Fee," 3 put one Henry de Lasborough into possession, whilst Hugh
le Despencer supported the claim of William de Dene, who is
styled " his steward." The result proved disastrous to the latter's
infant daughters, for shortly after his decease, Hugh demised the
manor by deed to Geoffrey de Westone (who had appeared at the
Inquest in the capacity of his attorney) to be held of him as
custos till the minors should attain the lawful age.4 This arrange-
ment lasted till 1326, when, after Hugh, who had been created
Earl of Winchester, was beheaded, the custoship was transferred
to Robert de Gold hull, by whom Lasborough was shortly after-
wards surrendered to the King's escheator, William Trussell, who
claimed it as part of the Earl's forfeited estates. Notwith-
standing the verdicts of jurors after the Inquisitions on oath in
1327 and 1328, whereby it was distinctly declared that the manor
was William de Dene's, and that Hugh le Despencer had entered
on it after William's death in no other capacity than that of
custos pending the minority of his daughters, the claim of the
Crown seems to have prevailed, and neither they, nor the husbands
to whom they were subsequently wedded, Ralph ap Eynon and
Ralph de Abenhall, ever obtained sasine. How long it was kept
by the escheator does not appear precisely, but we find that in
1346 the aid in respect to it was paid by Thomas de Astern,1 who
cannot, however, have continued in possession beyond 1354, in
which year a charter of free warren over the lands was granted to
1 Three years later Robert de Kaynes, junior, was in common with most
of the Gloucestershire Barons, attainted for " the Pursuit of the Despencers,"
After their downfall he was pardoned, but never recovered Lasborough nor
the more important Domain of Somerford-Keynes, in Wiltshire, of which it
had been made a dependency.
2 See documents quoted by Fosbroke, Vol. I., p. 408.
3 Dugdale (Baronage, Vol. I., page 427) says Hawise was the widow of
Robert de Kaynes, and the title here given to her looks as if she held
Lasborough in dower.
4 These particulars are derived from an Inquisition in 2 Edw. III. No. 80.
5 See Trans. Bristol & Glouc. Arch. Society, Vol. X., p. 284. It is not
clear who he was. There are manors so called both in Gloucestershire and
Somersetshire.
Testa IjE Nevill. 29
John Basset.1 The latter died in January, 1363, seized " in demesne
as of fee of the King of the Manor of Lasborough, by fealty as of
the demesne of Samford-Keynes in the hand of the King existing,"
leaving as his nearest heirs two daughters : Margaret two years
old, and Alice one.2 This John was the eldest son of Sir Simon
Basset 3 of Uley, who survived him by rather more than a year.
He had received from his father, on his marriage,4 Wynford,
Saltford, and other manors in Somersetshire, held of the Honour
of Gloucester, but these, on his premature decease, instead of being-
kept for his infant heirs, were resumed by Sir Simon, and retained
by the latter's second wife, Maude,5 daughter of Sir John de
Bitton, in spite of protracted litigation, till her death in 12th
Ric. II., when she made them over to her surviving son, Edmund
Basset of Uley. It is unnecessary to give details of the contro-
versy or its issue here,6 as it did not affect the Manor of
Lasborough, the custody of which, including that of the minor
heirs, passed in due course into the King's hand. Alice, the
younger of the two, dying at the age of five, her sister suc-
ceeded to all her rights.7 These passed afterwards to Walter
1 Both Atkyns and Rudder assert this fact, but, as usual, give no refer-
ences.
2 Inq. p. m. 36th Edw. III. No. 19.
s So described in Inquisition, p.m., 13 Ric. II., No. 4.
4 "In dote." See Inquisition.
5 Smyth (Hundred of Berkeley, p. 184) says Sir Simon had no children
by his first wife, Elizabeth, but Maude was clearly John Basset's step-
mother, for her former husband, Sir Wm, de la More, did not die till 1341.
(Herald and Genealogist, Vol. IV. p. 195,) so that no son of hers by Simon
Basset could have had a Charter of Free Warren in 1354, nor died a Knight
in 1363, with a daughter 2 years old. Moreover, the Chancery Decree in
7th Ric. II., declares that she had no grounds for occupying Wynford, &c,
either through "affinity or consanguinity," which could hardly have been
asserted if she were the mother of the last owner.
fi It seemed desirable to advert to it however, if only for the purpose of
pointing out the absurd errors into which Rudder fell, through finding in
the Calendar several Inquisitions, at distant dates, as to the lands held by
a John Basset, and not taking the trouble to ascertain that they all related
to the same person, who died on the Thursday after Epiphany in 36 Ed. III.;
instead of referring, as he does, that of 7th Rich. II. to a John, son of John
Basset, and that of 21st Ric. II. to a John, son of the second, who, according
to his idea, was the fatlier of Margaret —See Rudder's Gloucestershire Las-
borough, p. 5)6.
7 See Inq. p. m. 5th Ric. II. No. S. Alice had died in 41 Ed. III. (1367).
30 Transactions for the Year 1S89-90.
Broun, to whom the hand of Margaret was given soon after
the commencement of the reign of King Richard the Second. In
1381, on the plea of her being " Cousin and Heir " 1 to the William
de Lasborough who had, a hundred and twenty years previously,
obtained the grant of free warren (then exhibited), over his
demesne lands in Lasborough and Pagenhull,2 she and her
husband received letters patent 3 confirming similar privileges to
themselves. The former manor was in their possession till 1397,
but as no Inquisition on the death of either is extant, it is hard
to say how much longer they held it. Judging from the non-
existence of notice of any subsequent owner for considerably more
than a century, it seems probable that they left no issue, and that
it had reverted to the crown.
7. From William de Rodmerton for the third part of a fee in
Rodmerton of the fief of William de Kaines, 13s. 4d.
When remarking that the two fees held by William de Kaynes
were in Lasborough and Rodmerton,4 both in Langtree Hundred,
I overlooked the fact that his ancestor, Hugh Maminot, held
likewise at Domesday five hides in Sopeberi, which being in
Grumboldsash Hundred is not included here. The Revd. Mr.
Taylor identifies it with Little Sodbury,5 of which Fosbroke
1 Fosbroke, on the strength of this, represents John Basset as having
succeeded to Lasborough as a near relation of the Dene family, but we know
for certain that the last William de Dene left daughters whose issue was
still living. The fact is that as the original giant had been made to William
de Lasborough and his heirs, it became necessary— by a sort of legal fiction —
to describe the actual holders as being so ! It was doubtless no difficult
matter in those days to procure an " Inspeximus " upon pi*oducing the
original charter and paying the required fee (in this case half a mark was
paid into the Hanaper). There seems to have been no Inquisition by jurors,
although it was manifestly out of the question that the King in Council
could without one, judge of the truth of a complicated descent through two
or three families. It would be easy to cite other cases in which allegations to
the same effect were accepted unhesitatingly after the lapse of several
centuries.
2 Otherwise Pagan Hall, in the Parish of Stroud, held by him of the Earl
of Hereford. It went to the Denes, but was held subsequently by John of
Monmouth (Inq. ad quod damnum, 28th Edw. III. No. 37), and there is no
reason to think that it had passed to John Basset's daughter.
3 See Patent Roll of 4th Rich. II., second part, mem. 16.
4 Trans. Bristol & Glouc. Arch. Society, Vol. XII. , p. 267-
5 Analysis of Domesday, Vol. II., p. 188.
Testa i>k Nevill. 31
despairingly says "there is no mention in record."1 In 1346,
however, it is entered as being held as half a fee by Jordan
Bysshop,2 the overlord being, as usual in that Return, omitted.
This accounts for one fee and five-sixths of a fee out of the
original two fees of King John's time — the sixth still missing,
being presumably that which in Kirby's Quest William de Red-
merton is stated to hold in Roclmerton of the manor of Tetbury.3
How this portion of Rodmarton had became detached from the
rest, and included in the great Lordship of the De Braose family,
is a mystery, but the same thing had happened in the case of
other adjacent manors,4 notably that of Cherington, belonging to
the Honour of Wallingford, in which this same William de
Redmarton likewise held a fifth of a fee from William de Braose.
It looks certainly as if these acquisitions had been simultaneously
and amicably effected, at some period between the dates of Returns
Nos. 1 and 10, at which, in all probability, the Barony of St.
Valery, whereof Tetbury was a member, had been in the hand of
the King. Apparently William Redmerton was the last male of
his line, for in 9th Edward II. , the manor had passed into the
possession of no less than five lords.5
8. From Ralph de Cotes for one knight's fee in Cotes of the fief of
Walter de Lacy, 40s.
That the de Lacy fee in the parish of Cotes, Cirencester Hun-
dred, was held by the above-named Ralph in 1235, has been
already noted.6
9. From Fulk Cokerel for half a knight's fee in Cotes, of the fief
of Ralph Russell, 20s.
Reference was likewise made in my Paper on the Aid of
1235," to the tenure of the Cokerel family both then and in 1285,
1 Fosbroke, Vol. II., p. 29.
2 The Bisshop family had held for some time. In the Nomina Villarum
of 1316 John Bisshop and Robert Livett are given as the Lords of Sodbury
and Hildersley.
3 Trans. Bristol & Glouc. Arch. Society, Vol. XL, p. 152.
4 It will be seen that fractions of six manors, amounting in the whole to
one fee and eleven-thirtieths had been added, yet in 1346, Tetbury with its
members was assessed as only one knight's fee.
5 Vide Nomina Villarum in Pari. Writs.
8 Trans. Bristol & Glouc. Arch. Society, Vol. XIIL, No. 21, p. 326.
3 Idem., p. 320
32 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
of the half fee in the same parish which had come to the Russells
of Dyrham. The Fulk here mentioned was doubtless son of
Elias Cokerel, whose widow was their sub-tenant at the earlier
date.
No mention is made of the third and smaller sub-division of
Cotes, which, since its forfeiture by Gilbert fitz Turold, had formed
part of the Honour of Gloucester, but, as before suggested, it
may be included with Trewsbury. At the date of Kirby's Quest,
it was held separately of the then Earl by a Walter de Cotes as
one fifth of a fee.
10. From Geoffrey Martel for half a knight's fee in Stowell of
the fief of William de Hastings, 20s.
The same overlord and the same feoffee appear seven years
before.1 The descendants of the latter continued to hold in
Stowell, in Bradley Hundred, long after the Barony of Eaton
Hastings had passed into other hands, Adam Martel holding it in
1346 for a half fee, as an ancestor of the same name had done in
1285.
1 1 . From Richard de Hampton for a knight's fee in Stratton of
the fief of Walter de Lacy, 40s.
There is nothing to add to what is said in my previous Paper
as to this fee, excepting that in 1346 it had passed to a lady
known as Johanna de Cirencester, who was perhaps heiress of
the Hamptons.
12. From Adam Kaily and Thomas de Gardinis, for one knight's
fee in Side and Gardino, of the fief of John le Brun, 40s.
The Manor of Side, in Rapsgate Hundred, which had belonged
at Domesday to Ansfrid de Cormeilles, continued in the possession
of his descendant, Walter de Cormeilles, during the reign of
John.2 Upon the partition of the Barony among Walter's
three daughters in 1218, it must have gone to Richard le Brun.3
1 Trans. Bristol & Glouc. Arch. Society, Vol. XIII., No. 317.
2 Vide Trans. Bristol and Glouc. Arch. Society, Vol. XII., p. 253. This
effectually disposes of Sir Robert Atkyns' assertion that "Side came soon
after the Conquest " to the Giffards of Brimpsrield ; although it will be seen
from what follows that a scion of that House was sub-enfeoffed therein
before the close of the 12th century, presumably through marriage with a
daughter of the House of Cormeilles.
3 Not as Fosbroke suggests, to Hugh Giffard, the husband of the eldest,
neither of whose sons inherited an acre in Side.
Testa df. Nevill. 33
who had married the second, and from him descended to his son
the above-named John. The Kaily family — its sub-tenants — were
feoffees of the Giffards in Wiltshire,1 and had inter-married with
them on several occasions. Adam, though apparently only a
cadet, had obtained the hand of one of the daughters of Richard
Giffard, and succeeded in her right, on the death of Osbert her
brother, to this sub-en feoffment in Side, as well as to an interest
in lands in other counties."2
*
The association of his name with that of Thomas de Gardinis
in this Return, can mean no more than that the combined holdings
of the two made up the knight's service for which their overlord
was answerable. There was certainly no connection between the
manors named, as shown by their appearing in Kirby's Quest
under distinct headings, the half fee in Side being then held by
1 Elyas de Kailleway appears in the Wilts Returns (Testa de Nevill, pp.
142 and 157) as joint holder of four fees under Elyas Giffard (iv), whose
sister Berta lie had married : two of them are said to be in Kaillewent, which
looks as if the name were of territorial origin, though the "de" is often
omitted. Perhaps it was derived from " Caillou," a flint, as it is occasionally
spelt so. The spelling in fact was so various, — even sometimes in the same
document, that no conclusion can be come to.
2 This information is derived principally from Bracton's recently pub-
lished Note Book. In No. 1717, a.d. 1226, Oxon., Osbert Giffard calls
Elyas Giffard (iv) to warrant a fee which the latter's grandfather Elyas (in)
had given to his nephew Richard Giffard (presumably the Justice Itinerant
of the reign of Hen. II. ) which fee seems to have been made over by Richard's
son Osbert, to Adam de Kaylli and his wife Mabilia. In No. 671, a.d. 1231,
Kent, Warin de Montchesney claims and obtains the homage of Adam de
Kaylli and Mabilia, as well as that of Matilda Giffard, and of Isabella de
Fre\dlle, in respect to a fee in that county ; the two former ladies plead-
ing that it had been granted to their father Richard Giffard, and had come
to thorn on the decease of their brother Osbert. The third, Isabella de
Freville, is shown by a reference in Dugdale's Baronage (Vol. I., p. 501), to
have been the widow of this Osbert (and not consequently, I may add, of
the Osbert supposed by him, who did not die until 1247 (Cal. Geneal., p. 28).
We are thus enabled to comprehend the entry on the Close Roll of 15th
Hen. III., quoted by Fosbroke, as to a suit brought by Ralph de Wylington
and Olimpias his wife, against the same defendants, with the addition of
the Prior of Lanthony, with regard to their tenancy of three hides of land
in Side. This was the extent of the whole manor at Domesday, and it may
be inferred that Adam de Kaylii and his wife (called in the Close Roll
Matilda, probably in mistake for Mabilia) became seized of it after the
Vol. XIV. d
34 Transactions fur the Ykar 1889-90.
Simon de Caly,1 under Simon de Crome, and that in Duntisborne
and in "Gardino," by Thomas de Gardinis, jointly with Henry de
Lesa— in both cases of John le Brun, son of the preceding John.
It may be inferred from the second reference that " the Garden,"
from which Thomas derived his surname (often written de Gardino)
was situated in Duntisbourne Lire, the only one of the three
Duntisbournes in Rapsgate, unless indeed it were in Elkstone,
an adjacent parish in that Hundred, in which in 1346 a Thomas
de Gardinis paid for a quarter of a fee, John de Acton, the le
Brun representative, paying for another. Strange to say, no
death of her sister, and of her father's widow, since we find that in 1255
Matilda Kaylli passed a fine of half a knight's fee in Syde, and of the fourth
of a fee in Stoke Giffard and Brimpsfelde, in favour of one Adam de Crumbe,
on condition of his paying her 100s. and undertaking the services required
of her by John Giffard and John le Brun (Pedes Finiurn, Glouc, 39th
Henry III., No. 420.) There seems no means of deciding whether this
Matilda was the widow, or the daughter, of Adam de Kaylli. The tenancy
of Side by Simon de Caley in 1285, would be more easily accounted for on
the former supposition, but it seems odd if she had a son that she should
have sold the superiority of the lands,
1 The way in which Side shortly after this date became the property of
the Giffards of Brimpsfield is not altogether clear. In the General Inquisitions
as to their Heirs, taken in 1st Edw. III. (Cal. Inq. p.m., No. 84), it is stated
positively that the manor was purchased from Adam Caylcy by John
Giffard, senior, and settled on his third wife, Margaret Nevill. This mar-
riage cannot have taken place later than 1286, as her son, the second John
Giffard, was born on Midsummer day in that year (Calend. Geneal., p. 28)
but the settlement may have been post nuptial, and made at any time
before her husband's death in 1299. The difficulty is that, as has been
shown, Adam had then been dead between thirty and forty years, and it
can only, I think, be solved by assuming that the jurors of 1326, after the
lapse of nearly as long a period, had forgotten that the christian name of
the vendor was in reality Simon. That juries were by no means infallible is
evident, for in one of the two Inquistions as to Side, in this very escheat, it is
affirmed that the manor was held of John de Crome, whilst in the other John
Giffard is said to have held it "in demesne as of fee " on the clay he died. In
neither case is any allusion made to the overlordship of John le Brun, which
had evidently ceased to be more than nominal. Perhaps the motive of the
latter declaration was, that Side, having been made over by Margaret Nevill
(who still survived) to her unfortunate son, had been confiscated after his
execution in 1322, and granted by the crown successively to Hugh le Des-
penser, John Maltravers, and Thomas de Berkeley. The last named continued
in 1346 to hold it as half a fee, but, strange to say, his predecessor (c. 32nd
Edw. I.) is called Robert de Kailly, showing how loose and perfunctory was
the record of christian names in such documents.
Testa de Nf.vill. So
mention of a hamlet or subordinate manor called Gardinum is to
be found in any of the county histories, or original records.
13. From Lucia de Cormailles for a knight's fee in Winestun of
the fief of John le Brun 40s.
Winson, in Bradley Hundred, the fee here referred to, is
shown in my Paper1 on the Aid of 1235 to have then been held
by Walter de Baskerville of the Honour of Cormailles. How it
had passed in the interim to John le Brun, who is there recorded
as holding only two fees in Elkstone, of the same Honour, in
right of his father's marriage with one of the last Baron's co-
heiresses, does not appear ; nor is there any clue to the relation-
ship of the sub-feofee, which cannot have been close or her
position would have been different. There were at the time of
the partition several male collaterals, from one of whom she
probably sprung. Apparently she was the last of the name con-
nected with the manor, for in Kirby's Quest this Wynston is
said to be divided between John le Brun, Walter de Berton,
Absolom Clericus, and Simon de Solers. In 32 Edw. I. John le Brun
levied a tine,2 of his interest in favour of John de Acton, as he
had done with most of his lairls, so that in the Nomina Villarum
of 1316, Thomas de Berton, the Abbot of St. Peter's Gloucester,
(representing Absolom the clerk), Simon de Solers, and John de
Acton, are its lords. In 1346 John de Acton, John de Solers, and
Walter de Cirencester paid for half a fee in Wynston, which John
Broune? Walter de Berton, and William Absolom, formerly held
there.
4. From Robert de Meysi for half a knight's fee in Hampton of
the fief of the Earl of Gloucester, 20s.
1 A family bearing the same surname is said to have derived it from
Gordano, in Somersetshire (Collinson). There was a Thomas de Gardinis in
that county temp. Hen. III. A Thomas de Gardinis was Sheriff of Glouces-
tershire from 21st to 27th Edw. I. — Trans. Bristol & Glouc. Arch. Society,
Vol. XIII., p. 331.
2 Pedes Finium, Glouc, 32nd Edw. I., No. 240.
3 The way in which John " le Brun " is now Anglicised into plain John
Brown is worth noticing.
D 2
3(j Transactions for the Year 1883-9.
Hampton, in Gersdon (afterwards Cirencester) Hundred, had
belonged to the Honour of Gloucester ever since its forfeiture by
its Domesday lord, Earl Roger (Montgomeri), and had probably
been occupied during the entire period by the family from whom
it acquired its second appellation,1 for Godfrey de Maisey was a
tenant of Robert Earl of Gloucester in other manors so far back
as 31st Henry I.2 In 1165 a Robert de Meysi held nine fees of
Earl William, Robert's son, of which Hampton doubtless was one,
and about a hundred years later another Robert, probably the one
of this Return, appears as holding eight fees of the Honour. In
1285 Hampton Meysey was still held by a Robert de Meysi, but
before 131 63 it passed in marriage to the St. Maur's, who held in
1346.4
15. From Christiana de Mutton for half a knight's fee inTorinton
of the fief of William de Hastings, 20s.
About this lady no information seems procurable. In 1235
the wife of Osbert Giffard held one fee in Torinton (i.e. Farming-
ton, in Bradley Hundred) of William de Hastings, and it is not
improbable that she may have left it divisible between two
married daughters, of whom Christiana was the elder, since it
appears from Kirby's Quest that Peter de Staunton then held
half a fee in Thormanton of Nicholas de Multon,5 while William
de Ramsden held another half fee in the same, both of Benedict,
son of Benedict, who had succeeded to the Barony of Hastings of
Eaton.
16. From Richard Tirel for one knight's fee in Schipton of the
fief of Roger de Chandos, 40s.
Feoffee and overlord remain as in 1235. The fee came to be
distinguished by the addition of the name of the former, there
1 To distinguish it from Hampton, in Bernetre Hundred, now Shire-
hawpton.
2 Mag. Rot. Pipe, 3 1st Hen. I.
3 Nomina Villarum.
4 Aid for Knighting the Black Prince, ante Vol. X., p. 280.
6 As there was a great family in the north of this name, it struck me this
might be the true spelling, until I found that a Nicholas de Mutton at this
very time was entitled to the alternate presentation to the Church of Kyn-
merton. — Vide Calend. Geneal., p. 307, 9th Edw. I. (Mutton, I believe, is
a corruption of Mytton, a well known name.)
Testa de Xevill. 37
being no fewer than three " Sheep-towns " in Bradley Hundred
alone.
17. From Richard le Bret for one third of a knight's fee in
Weston of the fief of Hugh de Kylpec, 13s: 4d.
Hugh de Kilpeck did not die till 1244, two years after the
date of this Return. Weston Birt, as it came to be called from
a corruption of the tenant's name, in Langtree Hundred, belonged
at Domesday to Earl Hugh (of Chester), and how it had passed to
the descendant of William, son of Norman, 1 have failed to
discover. In 1285 it was held by the heir of John le Bret as half
a fee and one-tenth of a fee, of the Lord of Kilpeck ; but in 1346
the service again appears as one-third only.
18. From Geoffrey de Langele for half a knight's fee in Suthington
of the fief of Walter de Lacy, 20s.
Though a Domesday manor of the de Lacys, this Siddington,
a part of St. Peter's parish, in Cirencester Hundred, was omitted
in the list of Walter's fees in 1235. It must have been held of
him by the present feoffee for many years, since in the Carucage
.of 1221 it is distinguished as " Sodington-Geolfrey," and it con-
tinued in the latter's posterity in 1285, when John de Langley is
returned as holding it as an entire knight's fee of one of the de
Lacy heirs, Geoffrey de Geneville. It long continued to lie known
as Siddington-Langley.
Here Return No. 10 terminates abruptly with the notification,
" Sum total £33 3 8." This suffices to prove, at any rate, that
it is complete so far as it goes, and not a mere fragment, as might
have been supposed, seeing that it comprises scarcely one-fourth
of the number of fees lying within the Seven Hundreds, the whole
of those in Bisley and in Whitstan being left unnoticed. Pre-
sumably, as in the case of the Aid of 1235, the document preserved
at the Exchequer, and later on copied into the Testa de Nevill,
was the precursor only of the fuller account of his collections
subsequently rendered by the Abbot.
3S Tka.nsactio.ns for the Year 1SS9-90.
TESTA DE NEVILL
RETURNS FOR THE COUNTY OF GLOUCESTER.
No. 11.
De Serjanttis aientatis per Robertum Passeleive, temp. Henx Jil.
Regis Johannis.
As the Inquisition referred to in the above heading was made by
Judge Passelew in the year 1250,1 this Return appears to be
later than any other for Gloucestershire preserved in the "Testa."
Robert was brother to Simon Passelew, one of the Barons of the
Exchequer,2 and had himself tilled the office of Under Treasurer.
Since his mission had for its object to extract a rental from
persons who had alienated lands held by serjeanty, or neglected
to perform the services in consideration of which they were
granted, it was naturally unpopular, and Matthew Paris describes
him as "one of the King's ' Evil Counsellors.' "
The contents of the Return scarcely bear out its title, however,
for they evidently comprise memoranda as to Serjanties noted on
various occasions, instead of judicial decisions given during a
single Iter. The first fourteen entries are a repetition of those as to
Serjeants in the Forest of Dean, which occur at the beginning of
Return No. 8.3
Then follow notes as to four Serjeanties, each in turn declared
forfeit by reason of the alienation of the lands, but stated in
subsequent paragraphs to be confirmed under commuted annual
payments to the crown amounting to about one-third of the rent
obtained by the respective Serjeants, who likewise renew their
covenant for the due performance of the Customary Service. This
portion of the Eeturn contains in substance, no doubt, the record
of Robert Passelew's work, — but, strange to say, his judgments
are in every instance succeeded, not always immediately nor in
the same order, by other recitals to a similar effect, although
1 Vide Madox History of the Exchequer, Vol. I., p. 46.
2 Foss' Judges of England. 3 Ante pp. 14-19.
Testa de Nevill. 39
slightly varied in details, and in somewhat different phraseology,
presumably the work of another judge on some subsequent
occasion.
Return 11. in short was, notwithstanding its heading, evidently
not transcribed from a single Roll, but forms one of those com-
posite documents of which the Exchequer copyists of the 14th
century were so fond, and which, in the absence of dates, and of all
distinction between the several extracts embodied therein, prove
so puzzling. To obviate repetition, my comments on each of the
four Serjeanties in question, will be preceded by a summary of
the whole of the notices relating to it placed consecutively.
I begin with the entry which 1 have numbered
15. " The Manor of Sipton, in the County of Gloucester, which is
the head of the Serjeanty of William le Moyne, in Madinton, in
the County of Wilts, is in part alienated, whereby, indeed, the
Serjeanty by which he ought to be buyer for the Kitchen of
our Lord the King is aliened."
" From the same William for two virgates of land of the same
Serjeanty alienated which William and Richard, sons of
Richard de Wokinges hold from him, four shillings and six-
pence per annum : And he will do the aforesaid customary
services."
In addition to this, at page 78, column B, near the end of the
Return, we have :
" The Serjeanty of William le Moyne in Sciptun, by which he
ought to be Buyer for the King is alienated in part. William
and Richard, sons of Richard of Woking/ta?», hold of it two
virgates of land which are worth one mark per annum. And
the said William (le Moyne) made on this account an agree-
ment for the said tenants, with their consent, vizt., -Is. 6d. per
annum. So that each of these tenants may answer to the
same William for a third part of the value of his holding.
And the same William } may do the service of the aforesaid
Serjeanty."
1 As the William le Moine in question died in 1252, and the concluding
entry is in the present tense, it cannot be of later date. In the earlier entry
the word is in the future faciei, which is clearly more correct ; but in the
later faciat. The same observation applies to each of the foar (or five) cases.
40 Transactions for the Year 1S89-90.
Allusion has already been made in my remarks J on Return
No 10, to this Serjeanty of William Monachus, as he is there called,
in Shipton.
The manor belonged at Domesday to Maci de Mauretania, of
whom, although he held important fiefs in at least half a dozen
counties, nothing is known. This is of the less consequence, as
they all escheated to the crown by the end of the 11th century,
presumably in default of heirs, since his sub-feoffees seem gener-
ally to have been left in continuous occupation, which would
scarcely have happened had he been in rebellion. His estates in
Somersetshire were divided between the Honour of Gloucester and
the Barony of Castle Cary, but certain of his manors in Glouces-
tershire, Wiltshire, Dorset, Essex, and, possibly, Berks and Hants,
were granted by King Henry I.2 to Ralph " the Monk " to be
held by the serjeanty of keeping the King's larder. Who this
Ralph was, and whether the first of his line distinguished by an
appellation so unusual for a layman, has not been ascertained.3
i Ante p. 25, No. 4,
2 That he held by gift of that King rests on the testimony of a Return
of the reign of Edward I. in the "Testa de Nevill," which states that the
ancestor of this Ralph held the Manor of Oweres, in Dorsetshire, from the
time of Henry I. by Serjeanty of the Kitchen, p. 164
The date is so far confirmed by our finding on the Essex Pipe Roll, 31st
Hen. I., that William Monachus was excused payment of Danegeld, in Essex.
3 The name is to be found on the so-called Battle Abbey Roll, and the
William le Moine there mentioned has been claimed by the family of Monk,
of Potheridge, co. Devon (from whom the celebrated Duke of Albemarle
sprung), as their ancestor who, it is alleged, held that manor in 1066." We
learn, however, from Domesday that Mertone, of which it formed part, was
held in capite partly by the Bishop of Coutances and partly by Baldwin the
Sheriff, nothing whatever being said of sub-tenants. It must be admitted,
nevertheless, that a " Willelmus Monachus" does appear among the lay
witnesses to a charter of Robert Duke of Normandy's to the Church of
Bayeux in \0S9,h and it is not improbable that he was Ralph's father, but
this in no way proves his connection with Potheridge ; and the Duchess of
Cleveland prudently confines herself to stating that the le Moines were
seated at that place temp. Edward I. , and that not improbably the first of
them was a younger son of the family of Shipton Moyne, Gloucestershire.0
The county historians of Essex set up another claim in favour of a certain
Gilbert, an under-tenant of William de Warrenne'sat the time of the Survey,
whose descendants held a manor afterwards called Moyne, near Bumpstead
Steeple, but they give no authority for the assertion.
« Vide Pedigree in Playfair's British Family Antiquity, Vol. V., Appendix.
*> Yeatman's House of Arundel. c Battle Abbey Roll, Vol. II.
Testa de Xf.vill. 41
He can only be conjectured to have been some younger son of a
good House, who, after entering a monastery, upon unexpectedly
becoming the Head of his family procured a papal dispensation
from his vows.1
The descent from Ralph of William Monachus or le Moine, of
Returns Nos. 10 and 11, can be traced without much difficulty,
although it cannot always with certainty be determined who was
head of the house at any particular period. William appears to
have been succeeded by John le Moine before 40th Henry III.,
the threat of declaring his serjeanty forfeited by reason of the
alienation of two virgates of land, presumably in Shipton-Moine,
having been carried no further than the extraction of a payment
of 4s. 6d. per annum for the deficiency, in addition to a renewed
pledge for the performance of the customary service of the
serjeanty. The latter, which probably at first included attendance
on the King at the three great festivals at least, had, so early
as the accession of Richard I. been reduced to acting as " Lar-
derer "2 at the coronation of a new Sovereign, a privilege claimed
by the holders of the manors to the present day. Those manors
passed on the death of Sir John Moyne to Sir William Stourton,
who had married Elizabeth, his daughter and heiress, in 22nd
Richard II., and some of them are still in possession of their
posterity. Shipton Moyne, however, was alienated long ago to
the Estcourts,:j who, it may be inferred from the entry 4 in the
" Aid for Knighting the Black Prince " in 1346, had, before
the end of Edward I. reign become joint tenants of the fee
1 Such an occurrence was by no means unprecedented, as shown by Mr.
A. Lower, in his " Patronyinica Britannica," under the head of Ecclesiastical
Surnames. Among other examples he cites one of a married tenant of St.
Paul's, in the reign of John, who is described as William the Goldsmith,
surnamed " Monachus."
- " Achateur de Roy et Lardinier de Roy au temps de coronement de
Roy d' Engleterre," as denned tempore Henry V.
3 They are said to have derived their surname from living at the East
Court — no doubt the manor house or ' ' curia " of Gilbert de Shipton referred
to in a tine formerly quoted (p. 18).
" De Emma opie fuit uxor Johannis Beauboys, et Simone de Estcourt pro
une feodo militis in Shipton-Moigne quod Johannes Beauboys et Walterus
de Estcourt quondam tenuerunt ibidem."- — Vide Trans. Bristol and Glouc.
Arch. Society, Vol. X., p. 283.
42 Transactions ior the Year 1SS9-90.
formerly held by Gilbert de Shipton,1 and, after holding that
of the Stourtons for a time, eventually acquired from them the
entire manor, which has been transmitted, through female heirs,
to the present owner, the Rev. Edmund Hily Bucknall-Estcourt.
The history of the two virgates alienated to the sons of Richard
of Wokingham I am unable to trace, though Fosbroke considers
them to be the lands of which Mary Giffard, William de Sley,
and John de Dene were returned as lords in 9th Edw. II., when
John le Moine held the principal manor.
16. "Part of the Serjeanty of Gunnora de la Mare in Wenerich
pertaining to the Manor of Elsicot, in the County of Oxford,
for which she ought to be keeper of the door of the King's
Hall, is wholly alienated."
" From the same Gunnora for five virgates of land of the Serjeanty
alienated in the County of Gloucester, which Peter Prentuc
and Robert de la Mare 2 hold of her, fifteen shillings a year,
and she will do the service of half a fee for the said land, and
for the lands of the Serjeanty which she holds in the counties
of Oxford, Wilts, and Gloucester."
At page 78, column b, this is repeated with further particulars,
vizt., that Peter Prentuc holds half a virgate of the land worth
5s. per annum.
Robei't de la Mare three virgate and a half worth 30s. per ann.
John Lesquier one virgate worth 10s. per ann.
" Amount of the alienation, 45s. And the said Gunnora agreed
with her said tenants to pay 15s., the said tenants each answer-
ing to her for the other thirds, and the said Gunnora will do
the service as noted in the County of Wilts."
There is no reason to suppose that these De la Mares were
scions of the great Gloucestershire family referred to in Return
No. 10.3 We only know of them that they filled offices of menial
1 Ante Vol. X., p. 283.
2 Presumably son of Richard de la Mare mentioned in connection with
this Serjeanty in Return No. 8, ante p. 18.
3 There were at least twenty families of the name scattered all over
England in the 13th century, and it seems more reasonable to infer that in
many cases they had received it from their Norman compatriots on account
Testa de Nevill. 43
origin about the King's court, vizt., keeping the door of the King's
chamber, supplying brushwood and litter for the Royal household,
and preserving order among the laundresses 1 following the court,
in reward for which services they held by Serjeanty lands in
Winterburn la Mare, Wilts ; Windrush, in Gloucestershire ; and
Alvescot and Elton, Oxon. Though it is not easy in the two
former cases to be sure as to the Domesday owners of the lands, I
feel satisfied on close examination that they were held at the time
of the Survey, possibly on similar conditions, by Saxons, who, having
been themselves or their relations in the service of the Confessor
still continued in that of the Conqueror.2 At what period these
Saxon dependants were succeeded by Normans is not clear, but,
probably, during the reign of Henry I.3 These Serjeanties, how-
ever, cannot be traced to the De la Mare family until that of
Henry III., early in which, as we learn from " Testa de Nevill,"
Henry de la Mare " held a hundred solidates of land in Winter-
burn for being Marshal of Litter for the King " (p. 143) and
likewise 5s. in Laverstoke, (p. 148) in Wiltshire; and twelve
librates of land at Alvescot, in Oxfordshire, by the Serjeanty of
keeping the door of the King's Hall (p. 106). He died in 33rd
Henry III., just before the date of Robert Passelew's Inquisition,
of residence near English Meres, than that it was derived uniformly from a
single Mere in Normandy. The next Hundred in Wiltshire to that in which
Winterourn la Mare is situated, is called "Mere," and there are others so
named in Domesday.
1 Designated in those days of plain speaking by the uncomplimentary
epithet of " Meretrices Regis."
2 In Oxfordshire, under the heading, " Richard and other Servants of the
King," Elfeijescote (two hides) appears as held by Saric, in place of Ailwin.
In Wiltshire, under " Odo and other Thanes of the King," we learn again,
"Saric holds Winterburn, one hide and a half , which Ailwin held " — while
as proof of his nationality, it is stated with respect to another manor held by
him, and later on by the De la Mares (Laverstock), that it had been held by his
brother Gert. In Gloucestershire, two Wenrics appear among the lands of
the " King's Thanes," but as one was of considerable extent and its overlord-
ship was claimed by Winchcombe Abbey, whereas the other in Gersdone
Hundred, held of Chetel, was a hide and a virgate, or exactly the five virgates
alienated by Gunnora, there can be little doubt it was the latter.
3 In the earliest extant Pipe Roll a Henry de la Mare is credited with
payment in the Oxfordshire Return of no less than <£2S 6s. Sd. for having his
father's office of huntsman, but Dugdale claims him as ancestor of the de la
Mares, of Garsington, in that county, summoned as Barons, t. Edw. I. & II.
44 Transactions for the Year 1S89-90.
leaving Henry, his son and heir, a minor ;l the performance of the
services being undertaken by Gunnora, the widow, during the
nonage of the boy. The latter was entrusted to the custody of
John Mansel, by whom he was so badly brought up, that he
became on attaining manhood a " robber of churches," and was
slain in 51st Henry III. when flying from justice. His lands were
inconsequence forfeited. — Winterburn — " Gunnor," as it is still
sometimes called, being given by the King to his son Prince
Edward,'2 who bestowed it in alms on St. Mary's, Bristol ; while
Alvescote eventually fell to Robert Walraund, including, probably,
the overlordship of Windrush. The latter had indeed, according
to the Return, been "wholly alienated" or sublet, the chief
tenant, however, being a member of the De la Mare family.
17. "The Serjeanty of Henry de Monemewe, in Laghampton, by
which he ought to be the King's cook, is changed into another
service because the said Henry did not do that aforesaid."
" From the same Henry for the same Serjeanty, which contains
half a virgate of land, 12d. per annum. And he will do the
service of the first 3 part of one fee."
" Moreover William Wyberd holds in the same vill half a virgate
of land of the same Serjeanty, for which he ought to do the
aforesaid service. And because he has not done it, it is there-
fore changed into another."
" From the same William for the same land 12d. per annum.
And he will do the service of the fiftieth part of one fee."
At page 78, column b, these statements are repeated with
slight variations and additions —
Henry being said to hold an entire virgate worth 5s. a year,
William to hold of the same Serjeanty half a virgate worth 2s.,
whilst the latter's service is said, like Henry's, to be for the first
part of one knight.
1 Extent cited from the Hundred Rolls of 39th Henry III. (1255) by Sir
Richard Hoare, Hist, of Wiltshire.
2 Hoare's Wiltshire.
3 I do no understand what is meant by " prima pars feodi," nor how
that tallies with the fiftieth of one, which I take to be equal to the tenth of
a hide.
Testa de Nevill. 45
This Serjeanty in Leckhampton, with its holders, has twice
already been alluded to in these Gloucestershire Returns, and
there is little to add to what has been said on the subject.1 Henry
de Monmouth was presumably son to the Roger who in 1228 had
in some way acquired a share of Peter of the Hall's Serjeanty,
but William Wyberd did not hold at that date, and may possibly
have married another of the heiresses afterwards. A person of
the name is mentioned in the Fine Roll of 1253 as connected with
Kent, but as it is there spelt Wybe, t, a well known Teutonic per-
sonal appellation, this constitutes no sufficient proof of identity.
William's interest in the Serjeanty seems soon to have ceased, for
Walter Monmouth alone is mentioned in 29th Edward L, and
his son John in 9th Eclw. II.
18. " The Serjeanty of Richard de Pirie in Cirencester, by which
he ought to convey the King's treasure, at the expense of
the sheriff within the county of Gloucester, and at the cost
of the King outside the county, is alienated in particles."
" From the same Richard for seventy-two solidates of land alien-
ated from the said Serjeanty,2 which the undermentioned hold
of him, one mark per annum. And he will do the service of
the twentieth part of one fee."
Agnes daughter of Roger holds thereof a messuage worth 3s. per
year.
Gunnilda holds a messuage which is worth 2s. 4d. a year.
Maurice of Cirencester holds a messuage worth 3s. a year.
Richard the Tailor holds a messuage worth 2s. a year.
Richard the Merchant holds a messuage and 8 acres worth 5s. a
year.
Henry Avance holds a messuage worth 3s. 6d. a year.
Walter de Pirie holds a messuage worth 2s., with 3| acres of land.
Henry de Lattar holds 6^ acres of land and 1 acre of meadow
worth 6s.
Alice Dune] holds two half acres of land worth 6d. a year.
7 Trans. Bristol & Gloue. Arch. Society, J°{- $lh P" 2™.
•' V ol. XIII. , p. 296.
" I have here slightly varied the text so as to avoid having to repeat the
names as well as the preliminary recital.
46 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
Ralph Brid holds a messuage worth 2s. a year.
Humphrey de la Barre holds a messuage worth 3s. a year.
Richard Thorel holds a messuage worth 3s. year.
Jordan the Merchant holds a messuage worth 3s. a year.
Edwin the Merchant holds a messuage worth 3s. a year.
Geoffrey the Clerk holds a messuage worth 3s. a year.
Lyme Spiring holds a messuage worth eighteenpence a year.
Brian the Merchant holds a messuage worth eighteenpence a year.
Joseph holds a messuage with two acres in one field, and two in
another, worth 4s. a year.
Robert de Cotes holds a messuage worth 3s. a year.
Geoffrey le Berkier (the Shepherd) holds a booth dedicated to the
service of the Blessed Mary worth 2s. a year.
William de Duntesborn holds a booth dedicated to the same
service worth 2s. a year.
William de Ponto holds 6 acres of land worth 2s. a year.
Richard Herkebaud holds a croft worth 3s. a year.
The Almoners of Cirencester hold 6 acres worth 3s. a year.
As to Richard de Pirie, or the history of his Serjeanty, I
can discover very little.1 He was, presumably, the same Richard
who is given in the Testa as holding a quarter of a fee in Wilt-
shire of the Earl Marshal,2 but whether related to the William de
Pirie who held a fee in Pirie, in Staffordshire :? is uncertain. As
the word, however, means simply "a Pear Orchard," 4 it is perhaps
most likely that they were of distinct families.
Similar duties to those discharged by him are noted in the
Testa as performed by Serjeants in other counties, and as such
functions were of great antiquity, it is not improbable that the
twentieth part of a fee which he held represented one of the two
virgates mentioned in the Domesday account of Cirencester, as
appropriated to an officer who obeyed the behests of the shei'iff.
The land in question must have been close to the town, as it had
1 Fosbroke includes the name of " De Pirye " among the benefactors of
Cirencester Abbey, referring to Dugdale, who does not mention it.
2 Testa de Nevill, p. 137.
3 Testa de Nevill, p. 46.
4 The name is often written " Atte Purie."
Testa df. Nevill. 47
been divided into five-and-twenty allotments, which paid Richard
a rental of no less than 61s. a year, a good deal of it being let at
6d. an acre, then a high rate. The value indeed of the property
is shown by an entry on the Fine Roll of 1258, which shows that
the Abbot of Cirencester agreed to pay to the King thirty marks
for a charter authorising the receipt of one mark a year from the
Serjeanty which had been Richard de Pirye's. This looks as if
Richard was then dead, or had alienated the land. As there is
no allusion to this purchase in the text, we have another proof
that its compilation was anterior to the date above quoted. The
two other tenures by Serjeanty, in Little Tainton and Stoke
Archer, mentioned in No. 8,1 were, apparently, not dealt with by
Robert Passelew, as they are left unnoticed.
I have now completed my review of the Gloucestershire por-
tion of the so-called Testa de Nevill, and have shown that the
eleven fiscal Returns comprised in it date from the first half of
the 13th century. It is to be regretted that more were not pre-
served, and that some of those that have been relate to but a
portion of the county. Moreover, it is unfortunate that when they
were being transcribed into the Exchequer Register during the 14th
century a stricter supervision was not exercised over the copyists,
so as to have prevented their piecing together extracts from dif-
ferent original Rolls, under sometimes very misleading headings.
Still, despite deficiencies and drawbacks, these Returns furnish
much interesting information, and are well worth the attention of
the local historians of the future. I shall not, I trust, be sus-
pected of over-estimating the utility of what T have done to
identify and arrange them according to date, if I, in concluding,
express a hope that the example will be followed with regard to
other counties, so that materials may eventually be forthcoming
for the new edition of the " Testa," contemplated by my lamented
friend, the late Walford D. Selby, at whose suggestion my share
of the task was undertaken.
1 Ante p. IS.
48 Transactions fok thk Year 1889-90.
THE ANCIENT APSE OF DEERHURST CHURCH.
By the Rev. GEORGE BUTTERWORTH.
Ever since the publication of Mr. J. C. Buckler's interesting account
of the Priory Church of Deerhurst in the Society's Transactions,
Vol. XL (and, indeed, from a much earlier starting point), it has
been the wish of many to ascertain, if possible, what was the
actual form of the Apse of this well known Primitive Romanesque
building. Mr. Buckler having to frame his judgment upon very
slender evidence, viz., that afforded by 12 ins. of extremely rough
walling forming the commencement of the apse on the south side,
pronounced, positively, that it had been pentagonal. However, as
this shape is very unlikely to have been adopted in a building of
the Saxon period, he felt himself obliged to suppose that the
existing fragment of wall represented an apse of a later date than
that of the rest of the building, in spite of the herring-bone work
which charcterises the former, and that possibly it had taken the
place of an earlier semi-circular apse. But not a few persons,
among them the writer of the present lines, were unable to ac-
quiesce in the opinion that the shred of wall remaining above
ground was really a part of a straight-sided apse : to them it
seemed rather to suggest a curve. I am glad to be able to announce
that on the 24th September of the present year (1889), by means
of excavations made on the spot, I found myself in a position to
decide authoritatively the question. The shape was without
doubt semi-circular ; and there was never a polygonal apse. There
happened to be considerable difficulty in the way of effecting an
entirely satisfactory examination. The greater part of the site of
the ruined sanctuary of the church is occupied by a cider house.
However, the tenant of the Priory, Mr. Win. Phillips, obligingly
allowed me to make excavations both outside, and within, this
erection. Within the building, the outer face of the wall of the
apse was uncovered for the space of 7 feet, just at the crown of
Ancient Apse of Deerhurst Church, 49
the curve. Outside it, we struck upon the inner face of the north
wall, before the commencement of the spring of the curve, and
followed it for 7 feet beyond the spring. This section gave us
also, in its terminal portion, the outer face of the wall. The wall
is 3£ feet thick — the general thickness of the walls of the ancient
part of the church being about 2^ feet. We were able, in spite of
obstructions, to open a small third section, which presented to the
eye a portion of the outer face of the hidden wall. The examin-
ation was completely satisfactory, demonstrating the existence of
an apse of a curved form, as well as the non-existence of any
subsequent polygonal apse. There can be no reasonable doubt as
to the preservation, beneath the surface of the soil, of the entire,
unbroken span.
The dimensions of the ancient sanctuary are these : — space
between the crown of the curve and the chord, 9h feet ; from the
chord to the line of the arch separating the sanctuary and choir,
8£ ft. Thus 18 feet = extreme length of sanctuary.
Mr. Buckler observes, in his remarks on Deerhurst, that " a
Saxon apse remains to be discovered. It would be an interesting
revelation to make at Deerhurst." Thus the accomplished writer
almost anticipated the present " revelation " ; he erred only in
imagining that traces might also be found of the straight-sided
erection, of which, as it now appears, he himself was the sole
architect and builder.
Vol. XIV.
50 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
HISTORY OF THE MANOR AND ADVOWSON OF
CLIFFORD CHAMBERS, AND SOME ACCOUNT OF
ITS POSSESSORS.
By Sir JOHN MACLEAN, F.S.A., V.P.
Vice-President of the Royal Archaeological Institute of Great Britain and
Ireland, Hon. Member of the Royal Institution of Cornwall, <kc, <kc.
The Manor of Clifford before the Conquest was a member of the
great Manor of Tewkesbury, and was held by Algar, a great Saxon
Thane, who is supposed to have united all his lands and manors
in the north of Gloucestershire to that manor. From him it
descended to his son Brictric, known in history as Brictric, son of
Algar, who held that important manor with its appendages, and
various other manors in divers counties, at the time of the Con-
quest. His romantic history is too well known to be treated of
here, suffice it to say that Matilda, the wife of William Duke of
Normandy, treasuring up the mortification she had experienced
from him many years before in his rejection of her proffered love,
determined upon revenge, and maliciously contrived his destruc-
tion. The King's grant to her afterwards, of the greater portion
of Brictric's large possessions, including the great Lordship of
Tewkesbury, would seem to give some colour to the truth of this
legend. Before her death, in 1083, she conferred the Manor of
Clifford upon Roger de Busli, as appears from the following ex-
tract from the Domesday book : —
In Clifford are seven hides pertaining to the same manor
(Tewkesbury). There are there three carucates in demesne and
fourteen villans with five ploughs, and a mill worth 12s., and two
acres of meadow. There are between the male and female serfs
thirteen [ploughs 1] and a church and a priest with one carucate.
The value was £8, now £6. This land the Queen gave to Roger
de Busli, and it is geldable for four hides in Tewkesbury. To
this is added a recital of the other lands and manors under the
Maxor axd Advowson* of Clifford Chambers. 51
Manor of Tewkesbury, amounting in the whole to 85 hides, 50
hides being quit and free of all money tax and royal services.
This Manor of Tewkesbury, when it was whole, all under one in
the time of King Edward, was valued at £100, When Ralph re-
ceived it was only worth £12. because it was destroyed and dis-
ordered. Now it is appraised at £40, yet Ralph pays £50. This
manor, Brictric, the son of Algar, held in the time of King
Edward.1
Roger de Busli or Bushley, married a lady named Muriell,
but of what family she was we know not. Mr. A. S. Ellis is of
opinion that she was in some way connected with Queen Matilda,
because the Queen granted the Manor of San ford, in Devon,
jointly to the said Roger and Muriell his wife, and because
Muriell was a party with her husband in the grant of Clifford to
the Abbot and Convent of Gloucester, she must also have been a
party, directly in the Queen's bounty. This, however, though not
improbable, does not, necessarily, follow, for the manor having
been granted to her husband in fee, the wife would of course have
a claim upon it for her dower, for there were not at that time
settlements to bar dower.
Roger de Bushley, anterior to the date of Domesday, the
exact date we do not know, granted the Manor of Clifford to the
Abbot and Convent of St. Peter's, but among the donations of
land confirmed to the abbey by William the Conqueror at Christ-
mas in the very year of Domesday, is, in Gloucestershire Clifforde,
of the gift of Roger de Buseley. And in the abbey list of donations
to the house we find " Rogerus de Buseley et Muriel uxor ejus
dederunt Clyfford."
It must not be supposed that the whole of the revenues of the
Religious Houses were carried into a common fund for the use of
the community at large. Grants were frequently made by bene-
factors for specific purposes, but more frequently the abbot and
convent, in chapter, appropriated the issues of certain manors and
lands for the support of specific offices. Many instances might be
easily cited. In this case, at an early date, the Manor of Clifford
was appropriated to the Abbot's Chamber, and was administered
1 Domesday Survey, Facsimile III.
E 2
52 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
by the Camerarius, or Chamberlain, and hence it became known as
Clifford Chamberer or Chambers.
There is not much of interest to be written of the manor
during the five centuries, nearly, that it was in the possession of
the abbey, but we should not omit to notice a few incidents : —
Abbot Hameline, who ruled the convent from 5th December,
1148 to 1179, with the consent of his chapter upon the petition of
Reric, son of Illger, granted in fee and inheritance to Walter,
son of Hugh de Brithelmetona, a certain virgate of land belonging
to Clifford, in Warwickshire, which the said Illger and Reric held
in succession free and quit of all services, except aids, at the rent
of 5s. 6cl. annually to be held by the said Walter on the same
conditions.1
And the same abbot granted to the said Walter, upon the
petition of Geoffrey, Dean of Hereford, one hide of land in Clifford
which Semannus held, to be held of the convent in fee and inheri-
tance at the annual rent of 20s., to be paid to the Chamberlain, to
be free and quit of all exactions, except aids, and service at the
abbot's courts.2
Of greater interest is an extent of all the manors held by the
Chamberlain in the year 1266. These consisted of Clifford, Buck-
land, Guiting and Hinton. The following is the extent of the
Manor op Clifford.3
Robertus le Freman tenet quatuor virgatas terrse et duas
acras prati per cartam, qualibet virgata existente triginta sex
acris. Et tenet per cartam hsereditarie.
Et reddit inde per annum viginti quinque solidos sex denarios
ad duos anni terminos. Et si obierit, dominus habebit equum
suum cum hernesio et arma, si qua? habuerit. Et si han-es ejus
infra retatem sit, dominus habebit ipsius custodiam et terras
ejus maritagio. Et si legitime fuerit aatatis in obitu patris sui faciet
homagium, et dabit relevium domino suo pro terra sua, et faciet
forinseca servitia quae ad terrain suam pertinent.
1 Hist, et Cartularium Monasterii, St. Petri, Glouc, Vol. I., p. 256.
2 Ibid. Vol. II., p. 220. :t Ibid., III., p. 49.
Manor axd Advowsox of Cliffokij Chambers. 53
Radulphus de Eylestone tenet unam vigatam terra? continen-
tern quadraginta octo acras, et reddit hide per annum non redditum
aliquem, sed sequetur eomitatum Warwici et hundredum de King-
tone pro domino, et curiam de Cliflbrde pro omni servitio. Et si
obierit, fiet de herieto et de custodia terrse et ha?redis ipsius siout
superius in servitio Roberti le Freman.
Henricus filius Fabri tenet unam virgatam terra? continemtem
quadraginta octo acras [pro] eodem servitio in omnibus sicut
pra?dictus Randulphus. Et si pro defalta dictorum Randulphi et
Henrici dominus distringatur, ipsi in toto debent dominum in-
demnem conservare.
Willelmus filius Symonis tenet unam virgatam terra? continen-
tem quadraginta octo acras per cartam, et reddit hide per annum
septem solidos ad duos anni terminos. Et sequetur curiam de
Cliflbrde. Et si obierit, fiet in omnibus sicut de prsedicto Ran-
dulpho. Et faciet, forinseca servitia qua? ad terrain suam pertinent.
Willelmus filius Roberti tenet unam virgatam terre per cartam
continentem quadraginta octo acras, et reddit hide per annum
septem solidos ad duas anni terminos, et faciet in omnibus sicut
pra?dictus Randulphus. Duo molendina qua? solebant reddere
sexaginta solidos et sex denarios ad quatuor anni terminos erunt
ad Annunciationem Beata? Maria? proximo futuro in manibus
domini, quia tunc terminus praxlictorum molendinorum ad firmam
positorum pra?teriet.
Willelmus Molendinarius tenet duodecim acras terra? ad ter-
minum vita? sua? et uxoris sua? tantum, et reddit inde per annum
decern solidos ad quatuor anni terminus. Et facit minutas con-
suetudines non taxatas qua? ad terrain suam pertinent.
Tota villa de Clifforde dat in communi de annuo redditu pro
quadam parva pastura scilicit [in] quadam via sex denarios.
Nicholaus Hentelove tenet unam mesuagium cum curtillagio
et duas acras terre, et reddit inde per annum tres solidos ad duos
anni terminos. Et dabit auxilium secundum numerum animalium.
Et dabit pannagium, scilicet pro porco superannato unum denarium,
et pro juniori porco obolum, dummodo separatus sit vel liabilis ad
separandum. Et si braciaverit ad vendendum, dabit duodecim
54 Transactions eor the Year 18S9-90.
lagenas cervisire ad tonnutum, vel pretium earum. Et debet
redimere filium et filiam. Non potest vendere equum nee bovem
sine licentia. Et cum obierit dominus habebit melius averium
suam nomine haarieti.
Adam Textor tenet unum mesuagium cum curtillagio, et reddit
inde per annum duodecim denarios ad duos anni terminos. Et
levabit fcenum domini per quatuor dies, et valet duos denarios.
Et faciet tres bederipas, et valent quatuor denarios obolum. Et
alias consuetudines faciet sicut pmedictus Nicholaus.
Willelmus Marescallus tenet unum mesuagium cum curtil-
lagio et unam acram terrse, et reddit inde per annum duodecim
denarios ad duos anni terminos. Et faciet in omnibus sicut dictus
Nicholaus.
Alexander Sinne tenet unum mesuagium cum curtillagio et
unam acram terras, et reddit inde per annum duos solidos sex
denarios ad duos anni terminos. Et facit tres bederipas, et valent
quatuor denarios obolum. Et adunabit [adjuvabit] et levabit
fcenum domimi per quatuor dies, et valent duos denarios. Et
omnes alias consuetudines faciet sicut praadictus Nicholaus.
Hugo tilius Laurentii tenet unum mesuagium cum curtillagio
et unam acram terra?, et reddit inde per annum duos solidos sex
denarios ad duos anni terminos. Et facit tres bederipas, et valent
quatuor denarios et obolum. Et adunabit [adjuvabit] et levabit
fcenum domini per quatuor dies, et valent duos denarios. Et
omnes alias consuetudines non taxatas faciet dictus Nicholaus.
Thomas le Careter tenet unum mesuagium cum curtillagio et
unam acram terrse, et reddit inde per annum duos solidos sex
denarios ad duos anni terminos. Et adunabit [adjuvabit] et
levabit fcenum domini per quatuor dies, et valent duos denarios.
Et facit tres bederipas, et valent quatuor denarios obolum. Et
faciet in omnibus sicut praadictus Nicholaus.
Cristina Widye tenet simile tenementum, et facit adunationem
[adjuvationem] foeni per quatuor dies, et valent duos denarios.
Et facit tres bederipas, et valent quatuor denarios obolum. Et
reddit de annuo redditu ad duos anni terminos duos solidos sex
denarios. Et in omnibus aliis idem faciet sicut praadictus Nicholaus.
Manor and Advowson of Clifford Chambers. 55
Matilda relicta Galfricli tenet simile teneraentum, et reddit
indeper annum duos solidos sex denarios. Et adunabit [adjuvabit]
et levabit fcenum domini per quatuor dies, et valent duos denarios.
Et faciet tros bederipas, et valent quatuor denarios obolum. Et
omnes alias consuetudines non taxatas faciet sicut prfedictus
Nicholaus.
Johannes Lasteles tenet unum mesuasium cum curtillasio et
reddit hide per annum duos solidos sex denarios. Et adunabit
[adjuvabit] et levabit fcenum domini per quatuor dies, et valent
duos denarios. Et facit tres bederipas, et valent quatuor denai'ios
et obolum. Et omnes alias consuetudines non taxatas faciet sicut
dictus Nicholaus.
Adam Bruggemon tenet unum mesuagium cum curtillagio et
cum quadam pastura, et reddit inde per annum duos solidos ad
duos anni terminos. Et sustinebit pontem pro omni servitio. Et
est ibi qusedam collecta annua de tota villa cle Clifforde, scilicet
quindecim solidi, et inde liberantur annuatim hundredo de Theuk-
[esburia] decim solidi, et quinque remanebunt domino.
Willelmus de "Wmnecote tenet quinque cotagia de feodo domini,
et percipit inde novem solidos annuos, et nihil inde domino reddit
nisi sectam ad curiam de Clifforde. Et debit homagium domino
abbati Gloucestria\ Et cum obierit dominus abbas habebit cus-
todiam redditus pnedicti, et hreres infra setatem fuerit, usque ad
legitimam petatem ipsius.
Summa certi redditus per annum, prater hrman molendinorum,
septuaginta sex solidi sex denarii.
Consuetudinarius ; memorandum quod plus tenet.1
Ricardus de Porta tenet unam virgatam terra? et dimidiam
acram prati, virgata existente de triginta sex acris. Et debet arare
dimidiam acram ad yemale et dimidiam acram ad Quadragesimale,
et illam terrain herciare tempore seminis. Et valet in summa quatuor
denarios. Et a festo Sancti Michaelis usque ad festuin Sancti
Petri ad Vincula debet qualibet septimana operari opus manuale
per quatuor dies cum uno homine, et valet qiuelibet dicta obolum.
Et summagiabit apud Gloucestriam bis in anno, et valet octo
1 This sentence is writen in red ink.
56 TiiANSACTloxs fou the Year 1SS9-90.
denarios. Et etiam debet qualibet septiraana quinto die vel sexto,
pro voluntate domini, summagiare apud Hinetone vel Boclande et
valet quaelibet dieta unum denarium obolum. Et lavabet et tondet
bidentes domini per duos dies, et valet unum denarium, allocate ei
opere illius diei. Et debet falcare pratum domini per quatuor dies,
et valet quaelibet dieta ultra operationem debitam unum denarium.
Et adunabit [adjuvabit] et levabit fcenum domini per tres dies et
amplius si necesse fuerit et valet quaelibet dieta obolum, non
allocata operatione. Et debet cariare fcenum domini per unum
diem, et valet duos denarios ultra operationem illius diei manualem,
quae extenditur ad obolum. Et debet cariare buscam ubicumque
dominus voluerit, et allocabitur ei pro opere unius diei. Et debit
facere duas bederipas ante acl Vineula Sancti Petri cum duobus
hominibus, et valent tres denarios.
Summa valoris operationem ante autumnum quatuor decim
solidi sex denarii obolus.
Et a festo Beati Petri ad Vineula usque ad festum Beati
Michaelis, debet qualibet septimana operari in messe domini per
quinque dies cum uno homine, et valet quaelibet dicta unum
denarium obolum. Et faciet octo bederipas cum duobus hominibus,
et valent in summa duos soliclos. Et debit bis in hebdomada per
quatuor septimanas cariare bladuin domini, et valet quaelibet dicta
ultra operationem manualem unum denarium obolum. Et debet
portare tassa in grangia domini per unum diem, et valet obolum.
Et dabet auxilium secundum quantitatem terrae et numerum
animalium. Et si braciaverit ad vendendum, dabit duodecim
legenas cervisiae ad tonnutum vel pretium earum. Et debet
pannagiare porcos, scilicet pro porco superannato unum denarium,
et pro juniori porco obolum, dummodo fuerit separatus vel habilis
ad separandum. Et non potest vendere equum nee bovem sine
licentia. Et debet redimere filium et filiam. Et cum obierit,
dominus habebit melius averium suum nomine lierieti.
Summa valoris operationum in autumuo octo solidi et obolus.
Walterus tilius Yvonis tenet imam virgatam terrae continen-
tem triginta sex acras, et facit in omnibus sicut praedictus Ricardus.
Memorandum quod plus tenet.
Manor and Ahvowson of Clifford Chambers. 57
Henricus de Wilicote tenet unam virgatam terrre, et facit in
omnibus sicut prsedictus Ricardus.
Alicia Williames tenet unam virgatam terra?, et facit in
omnibus sicut dictus Ricardus.
Nicholaus de Middeltone tenet unam virgatam terra, et facit
in omnibus sicut Ricardus.
Matilda Adam tenet unam virgatam terra?, et facit in omnibus
sicut dictus Ricardus.
Relicta Johannis Rondulf tenet unam virgatam terra?, et facit
in omnibus sicut Ricardus. Memorandum quod plus tenet.
Willelmus le Orl tenet unam virgatam terra?, et facit in omni-
bus sicut pnedictus Ricardus.
Ricardus Palmerius tenet unam virgatam terra1, et facit in
omnibus sicut prsedictus Ricardus. Memorandum quod plus tenet.
Ricardus de Ovetone tenet unam virgatam terra?, et facit in
omnibus sicut dictus Ricardus.
Thomas Rawe tenet unam virgatam terra?, et facit in omnibus
sicut prsedictus Ricardus.
Nicholaus le Orl tenet unam virgatam terre, et facit in omni-
bus sicut prsedictus Ricardus.
Bertram Belami tenet unam virgatam terra?, et facit in omni-
bus sicut pra?dictus Ricardus.
Robertus filius Willelmi tenet unam virgatam terra?, et facit
in omnibus sicut dictus Ricardus.
Sampson Neweman tenet unam virgatam [terra?] et facit in
omnibus sicut prsedictus Ricardus.
Johannes filius Willelmi tenet unam virgatam terra?, et facit
in omnibus sicut praedictus Ricardus.
Item apud Aileston.
Galfridus de Forde tenet unam virgatam continentem viginti
octo acras, et debet a festo Sancti Michaelis usque ad festum
Sancti Petri ad Vincula qualibet septimana per quatuor dies
operari opus manuale cum uno honiine, et valet quselibet dieta
obolum. Et summagiabit bis in anno ad Gloucestriam, et valet
octo denarios. Et quinto die vel sexto qualibet septimana sum-
magiabit apud Hynetone aut Boclande, et valet quselibet dieta
58 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
unam denarium obolum. Et debet arare dimidiam acram et illaru
herciare tempore seminis, et erit quietus per totam illam hebdom-
adam qua araverit dimidiam acram. Et levabit et tondet oves
domini per duos dies, et valet unum denarium obolum. Et
falcabit pratum domini per quatuor dies, et valet quselibet dieta
ultra operationem debitam duos denarios. Et adunabit [adjuvabit]
et foenum levabet per quatuor dies, et valet quaelibet dieta ultra
operationem debitam obolum. Et cariabit foenum et valet duos
denarios ultra operationem manualem illius diei qua? extendit[ur]
ad obolum. Et debet cariare buscam ubicumque dominus voluerit,
et allocabitur ei pro opere diei. Et faciet duas bederipas ante
Gulaustum cum duobus hominibus, et valent tres denarios. Et
a festo Sancti Petri ad Vincula usque ad festum Sancti Michaelis
debet qualibet septimana operari in messe domini per quatuor
dies cum uno homine, et valet qurelibet dieta unum denarium.
Et debet quinto die summagiare, et valet dieta unum denarium
obolum. Et faciet octo bederipas cum duobus hominibus, et
valent in summa duos solidos. Et debet bis in hebdomada per
quatuor septimanas cariare bladum domini, et valet dieta ultra
operationem manualem unum denarium obolum. Et csetera cuoque
faciet sicut dictus Ricardus de Porta.
Willelmus de Rye tenet unam virgatam terras, et facit in
omnibus sicut praedictus Galfridus.
Thomas le Orl tenet unam virgatam terra, et facit in omnibus
sicut praedictus Galfridus.
Rogerus Silvestre tenet unam virgatam terra;, et facit in om-
nibus sicut dictus Galfridus.
Radulphus Frankeleyn tenet unam virgatam [terras], et facit
in omnibus sicut dictus Galfridus.
Alicia Mauger tenet unam virgatam terras, et facit in omnibus
sicut pra^dictus Galfridus.
Ricardus Newcomene tenet unam virgatam terras, et facit in
omnibus sicut dictus Galfridus.
Robertus de Forda tenet unam virgatam, et facit in omnibus
sicut dictus Galfridus.
Cristina relicta Carectarii tenet dimidiam virgatam terra? et
Manor and Asvowsox of Clifford Chambers. 59
facit naedietatam servitii in omnibus, sicut praedictus Galfridus de
Ford a.
Omnes prsedicti consuetudinarii dant annuatim de auxilio
viginti solidos, et omnes debent cariare molas, scilicet petras
molares ad molendinum domini, vel dabunt in communi tredecim
denarios quadrantem.
Item apud Clifforde sunt quatuor carucse arantes in dominico,
et sunt ibidem triginta sex boves, scilicet cullibet caruca? octo
boves et quatuor ultra.
From the above Extent it will be seen that in the ville of
Clifford there were five Free tenants. Of these, Robert le Freman
held of his inheritance 4 virgates of 36 acres of land, and paid an
annual rent of 25s. 6d. If he died the lord had his horse, harness
(armour) and arms, and should his heirs be within age he had the
custody of their lands and their marriage. If of full age on the
death of their father, on doing homage and paying their relief, the
lands were restored to them subject to such services as pertained
to the same.
The other four free tenants held each a virgate of land of 48
acres. One of these, Radulphus de Eyleston, paid no rent, but
was bound to do the abbot's service in following the Earl of
Warwick, and at the Hundred of Kington for the lord, and at
the Court of Clifford for all services; and his heirs on his death
were subject to the same conditions as those of Robert le
Freman. Henry, the son of the Smith (Fabri) held his virgate of
land also rent-free by the same services in all things as Randolph,
and if through default of the said Randolph and Henry, the lord
suffered loss the same should indemnify him.
The other two tenants, William son of Symon and William
the son of Robert, held their virgates by charter by the same
tenure as Randolph, and each paid rent at 7s. 6d. per annum.
There were two mills which produced a rent of 66s. 4d., and
William the miller held 12 acres of land for the term of his own
life and that of his wife at a rent of 10s. per annum.
So that the total issues of the free tenants and the mills
amounted to £5 0 10 per annum.
60 Transactions for the Year 1SS9-90.
There were also nine cottager tenants who held between them
12 acres of land, and paid in the whole 19s. 6d. rent, and one
other who held five cottages paid 9s. rent, but he owed no other
service to the court of Clifford. He owed homage, however, to
the lord abbot at Gloucester, and when he died the abbot had the
custody of his heirs and rent aforesaid until they attained full age.
The sum of the rents of this class was 76s. 6d., beside the farm
of the mills.
The customary tenants appear to have been of two classes.
Of the first class there were 17, each of whom held one virgate of
land, containing 36 acres ; and of the other class there were 8, of
whom each held a virgate of 28 acres, and the ninth, a woman,
held half a virgate, or 14 acres. These were held rent free, but
the tenants had to give labour in the cultivation of the demesne,
the saving of the crops, and other such services, the value of which
for each tenant was estimated at £1 2s. 7d. a year, the woman, in
respect to her half virgate, paying half that sum.
All the aforesaid customary tenants gave annually of aid 20s.,
and all owed mill carriage, viz., mill stones, &c, to the lord's mill
or gave in common 13Jd.
At Clifford there were four ploughs for the arable land in
demesne, and there were 36 oxen, viz., for each plough 8 oxen
and 4 besides.
At this date a very large portion of the manor consisted of
open fields, and so continued down to the middle of the last
century, when they were enclosed and apportioned.
We have no records relating to the Abbey of St. Peter's during
the 15th and 16th centuries, and must therefore pass over the
history of the Manor of Clifford during this long period. It is
not likely, however, that any stirring incidents occurred to disturb
its quiet course under the government of the abbots down to the
eventful reign of Henry VIII.
By an Indenture dated in the feast of St. Michael the Arch-
angel, 18th Hem-y VIII. (1526), between William, Abbot of
St. Peter's, and the convent there of the one part, and William
Raynesford, Johanna his wife, Charles their son, Joice their
Manor and Advowson of Clifford Chambers. 61
daughter, John Alderfull son of Walter Alderfull, of Knyghtwike,
in co. Worcester, and Elianora daughter of the said William
Raynesford of the other part, it is witnessed that the said abbot
and convent grant, and to farm demise, to the said parties of the
second part the reversion of the site of the Manor of Clifford
Chamberer with its appurtenances, including two water mills with
the mulcture of the tenants and the fishery of the waters of the
same, now being in the tenure of George Tumour, to have and to
hold and occupy the said manor to the said William and the
others of the second part for the term of 61 years, if either of
. them should so long live, rendering to the said abbot and convent
by the hands of the chamberlain £16 sterling per annum in two
equal portions, and pay for the said abbot and convent and their
successors 16s 10^d annually : viz., a free rent arising out of the
Manor of Hyneton to the heirs of the Lord le Despenser 10s., to
the bailiff of Tewkesbury 5s., and to the bailiff of the Hundred of
Kington 2'2%d.; and the said farmers (firmarii) were to provide
for the chamberlain and steward [senescallum] and their servants
and horses, twice annually when they came to hold the court, their
food and drink and fodder for their horses, &c, good and honest
for two days and two nights ; and further the said farmers were
to keep in repair the site of the manor and mills and all edifices
during the aforesaid term, for which they were to have timber, &c,
and they were also to have wood and underwood there growing,
heybote, firebote, ploughbote, and cartbote by their hands without
making waste, and the said farmers were to collect rents and other
profits of the manor and account for them to the said abbot at
Gloucester. And the said farmers were to receive on entering
upon the premises the store of implements of the aforesaid George
and his executors, &c., with covenants for the payment of the
rent, or in default to suffer distraint and removal.1
We give a tolerably full abstract of this lease as an example of
the usual form of abbey leases. It will be observed that no fine
was demanded, and it may be concluded that the rent agreed upon
was considered the full value of the manor at this date, but it is
1 Hist, et Cartularium Monasterii Sancti Petri, Gloucestria?, Vol. III.,
pp. 308-311.
62 Transactions foe the Year 1889-90.
well known that the abbey rents were, generally, very low.
On the dorse of the lease is the following Inventory of the
Implementum of the Demesne, with this title : —
Inventorium sive staurum deliberandum infranominato
Willielmo Raynesford et aliis in ingressu suo infra tirmam de
Clifford, quod percipiet de ultimo firmario ibidem existente, vel
ejus executoribus sive assignatis.
In prim is, octodecim quarteria whete.
Item, viginti quatuor quarteria barly.
Item, sexdecim quarteria pulsae.
Item, tria quarteria otes.
Item, duo oxe waynes.
Item, duo plowes.
Item, octo yron cheynes with yokes and other necessariis belonging
to two waynes.
Item, two harrowes for horses, whereof one is called a bastard
harrow with yron teeth.
Item, an horse saddle, three colers of lether, three payre of tracys.
Item, a wayne rope.
Item, two sackes, a busshell measure bounde with yron, one forke
for hay, two forkes for corne.
Item, a fate.
Item, forty-eight acres twys falowes and thries falowed and
douged.
Item, a trowe of stone for swyne.
Item, a great mortar of stone.
Item, a coffre.
Item, a tabulborde, a payre of trestelles.
Item, a ledon furneys.
Item, all the haye of the medowes of the demaynes growing. .
Item, all the strawe and chaffe remayning in the garners at that
tyme.
We are informed by the Rev. Win. Bazeley that, as might be
expected, there is a large number of leases copied into the Abbey
Registers in the Chapter Library at Gloucester, which the editor
of the Historia et Cartularium Monasterii GlcucestricB did not
Manor and Advowson or Clifford Chambers. 63
consider of sufficient public interest to notice in that work. Mr.
Bazeley says there are no fewer than eighty deeds copied into the
registers relating to the conveyance of land in the Manor of
Clifford Chambers alone, with the names of witnesses and dates
of the 14th and 15th centuries. We pass these by. They doubt-
less were chiefly leases to farm. There are one or two, however,
of later date it will be desirable to mention.
In the register of Abbot Parker, Vol. II., is recorded a release
granted by William, abbot, and the convent, dated 24th July,
1537 (29th Henry VIIL), of the site of the manor, &c, to the
above-mentioned William Rainsford and Johanna his wife, and
to Charles, Gaudiosa and Elianora their son and daughters, and to
John and Walter Aldersfull, of Knightwick, co. Wore, and to
William Rainsford their cousin, son of John Rainsford, of
Michel Teme, in co. Oxon, from the feast of St. Michael, 1534,
for the term of 80 years, if either of them should so long live, at
the rent of £17 per annum. The reversionary interest still rested
in the abbot and convent, and, on the 3rd Mar. 1537-8, in the same
regnal year, by Indenture under the Common Seal, they demised
to John A Combe.' of Stratford-upon-Avon, gent., the reversion of
the site of the same manor with appurtenances. All these leases
would seem to be entirely ignored, for what reason does not
appear, for on the 10th October following (30th Henry VIIL) the
abbot and convent granted a lease of the whole manor, with all
its appurtenances and franchises (the advowson of all churches,
chapels, and chantries excepted) for the term of ninety and nine
years to John Russell, of Strensham, co. Wore, Knt., and Jerome
Cooke, of Clifford Chambers, gent., their heirs and assigns, to
commence from the feast of St. Michael then last past,1 at the
annual rent of £35 ; and there is an extz'act from the Minister's
Account of the 3rd Edward VI. shewing that that sum was
received and accounted for by the minister of that year as the
farm of the manor, and it continued to be held by the said parties
down to the reign of Queen Elizabeth. In the 4th year of that
Sovereign, however, by letters patent dated 1st May, 1562, the
Queen, in consideration of the sum of £1,260 paid into the
1 Clifford's Muniments.
t}4 Transactions for thk Year 1889-90.
Court of Augmentation, granted to Charles Rainsford, Esq., all
the Manor and Lordship of Clifford, alias Clifford Chamberer, with
all its rights, liberties, franchises, ike. , and appurtenances, late in
the tenure of John Russell, Knt., and Jerome Cooke, gent., for a
certain term of years not as yet expired, and also all those lands,
tfec, called the hamlet of Ayleston, in the parishes of Ayleston
and Clifford, in the counties of Warwick and Gloucester, of the
annual value of £35, beyond reprises, reserving all lead and all
advowsons of churches, chapels, &c, to have and to hold to the
said Charles Rainsford, his heirs and assigns for ever by the
service of the 20th part of one knight's fee for all rents, services,
and demands whatsoever.1
Charles Rainsford was twice married. By his first wife Jane,
dau. of John Morgan, of Camberton, co. Worcester, by whom he
had issue nine children — -1. Thomas; 2. Hercules, who succeeded
him at Clifford, and was executor to his father's will ; 3. Morgan,
living in 1 -r)78 ; Jane, who married John Prouse, of Slaughter, co.
Glouc. ; Elizabeth, wife of Robert Wincott, of Kensham, co. Oxon,
both living in 1578 ; Eleanor, who on 20th February, 8th Eliz.,
being then 40 years of age, surrendered to her father what interest
she had, or was supposed to have, in the manor ; Margaret being-
unmarried 1578. His second wife was Frances, daughter of
Henry Wynrlsore, who survived him, but had no issue. On 31st
May, 10th Eliz., (1568) Charles Rainsford by his Indenture con-
veyed all his estates in Clifford to certain trustees to the use of
himself for life, remainder to Hercules Rainsford his son and the
heirs males of the said Hercules for ever. And, at Clifford, on the
26th April, 20th Elizabeth (1578), he made his last will, in which
he names his daughter Margaret, son Morgan, and a certain
Ambrose Rainsford, whom we have failed to identify, and appoints
his son Anthony Rainsford and his (testator's) wife Frances,
executors to his will, and died on the 30th of the same month.
On an Inquisition taken at Stratford-upon-Avon, 18th December,
following under a torit diem clausit extremum dated the 12th
September previously, the jurors found that the said Charles on
the clay on which he died did not hold any lands or tenements in
1 Rot. Pat., 4th Eliz., Part 2.
Maxor axd Advowsox of Clifford Chambers. 65
the County of Warwick of the Queen or of any other person.1
There is no Inquisition extant for Gloucestershire.
Thomas Rainsford, the eldest son of Charles, appears to have
married a certain Alice and to have resided at Clifford, and
had by her three children ; Alice, John and Frances. Frances
died in 1576 and Alice in 1578. John was not baptized until
1599, and we do not know anything further concerning him.
Hercules Rainsford, who succeeded his father at Clifford,
married Elizabeth, daughter of Robert Parry, of Denbigh, by
whom he had issue Henry and Elizabeth. The latter became the
wife of Edward Marrow, son and heir of Samuel Marrowe, of
Barkwell, co. Warr. She died 29th Oct., 1601, and was buried
at Clifford, where there is a Brass to her memory (see Plate )
Hercules Rainsford himself died 2nd Aug. 1583, intestate, aged 39,
and administration of his effects was granted the following day to
Elizabeth his relict. There is a Brass in Clifford Church commemo-
rating both (see Plate ). The Inquisition taken at Campeden, on
11th Dec. 1583, is a document of considerable interest. It begins
by reciting the convent leases of 16th July, 21th Henry VIII. ,
and 3rd March, 29th Henry VIII., as if they had been carried
into effect, but says nothing of that of the 30th Henry VIII.
to Sir John Russell and Jerome Cooke, who, we have seen from
record evidence, held the lease on to the reign of Queen Elizabeth,
and it had not expired when the manor was granted in fee to
Charles Rainsford. It recites also the settlement deed of the said
Charles, and his will which we have noticed above, and the jurors
say further that the aforesaid Hercules took to wife a certain
Elizabeth, who was still alive at Clifford, as was also Frances the
relict of his father ; and they say further that Henry Rainsford
is the son and nearest heir of the said Hercules, and on the 18th
instant will be 8 years of age. Lastly they say that the said
Manor of Clifford is held of the Queen in capite by the 20th part
of one knight's fee, and that its value per annum, beyond reprises,
is £18.2
1 Inq. p.m. 21st Elizabeth, No. 110.
2 Inq. p.m., 26th Eliz. No. 198.
Vol. XIV. y
66 Transactions for the Year 1SS9-90.
On the 2nd August, following the death of Hercules Rains-
ford, an extent was taken by Christopher George, Esq., the
Queen's Feodary, to ascertain the value of all the manors, messu-
ages, lands and tenements of the said Hercules which have
descended unto Henry Rainsford, his son and next heir, of the
age of 8 years the 18th of December next after the finding of the
office, taken at Campeden the 11th December, 26th of the Queen
(1583).
First it is found that the site of the Manor of Clifford Cham
berer, with the houses, edifices, buildings, stable, lands, two water-
mills, one orchard, two gardens, divers closes, meadows, leasowes
feedings, and pastures to the same belonging in the counties of
Gloucester and Warwick, are worth by the year c£16. And it is
stated that Frances, late the wife of Charles Rainsford, deceased,
is now living and doth hold part of the said lands for her life in
consideration of her jointure, and that the same Hercules died
seized of certain tenements, parcel of the said manor, of the value
of £6 a year, included in the said sum of £16. There were two
free tenants who paid rents of assize, amounting together to lOd.
per annum, two conventionary tenants, who, together, paid a rent of
£2 9s. Eleven copyhold tenants who, together, paid rents amount-
ing to £8 9s., and twelve tenants at will who paid annually
£2 15s. 10d., making the total value of the manor £29 13s. 8d.
(miscast as £29 13s. 10d.), out of which was payable an annuity
of £13 6s. 8d. to Thomas Rainsford for the term of 60 years if
the said Thomas, or any woman the said Thomas should marry, or
either of them should so long live ; and it is stated that the said
manor is held of the Queen in capite by the service of the 20th
part of a knight's fee, and that Elizabeth, late the wife of the
said Hercules, is still alive. Dated 15th June, 26th Elizabeth1
Six months after the death of Hercules Rainsford, his relict
Elizabeth, who, the day following his death, hastened to obtain
letters of administration to his effects, had already contracted a
second marriage with William Barnes,2 of Taulton, in the parish
1 Clifford Muniments.
2 William Barnes was the eldest son of William Barnes, of Bercheston
and Talton, co. Wore. , by Alice daughter of Middlemore, of Egebaston,
Manor and Advowson of Clifford Chambers. 67
of Tredington, co. Wore, who by an Indenture dated 10th June,
(1584) made a post nuptial settlement by which he conveyed to
Sir Henry Sidney and other trustees certain houses and closes of
land in Wincott, in the parishes of Clifford and Quinton, known
as a moiety of the Manor of Wincott, and also all the Manor of
Tadlington, alias Taulton, to the use of the said William Barnes
and Elizabeth his wife, and the survivor of them, remainder to
the heirs of the body of the said William in tail male, in default
remainder to the said William, his heirs and assigns for ever.
And so, for the Manor of Taulton under the same limitations :
and that the said William and his heirs will indemnify the said
Elizabeth against all charges on the moiety of the Manor of Win
cote and the Manor of Taulton, except the estate of Alice Barnes
mother of the said William, and the rents and charges created on
the latter by the will of William Barnes, deceased, and the rents
and services due to the Queen and their other chief lords ; and
further, if it shall happen that at any time during the life of the
said Elizabeth the residue of the estate for a term of years by the
lease of the Abbot and Convent of Gloucester to John Combes
gent., deceased, should fall into the hands of the said William he
will convey the same to the aforesaid trustees to the uses of the
said William and Elizabeth for life, remainder to Henry Rainsford,
son and heir of the aforesaid Hercules and the said Elizabeth, and
co. Warr. By his will dated 22nd August, 1621, for the special love and
affection for his well-beloved son-in-law (? stepson) Sir Henry Rainsford, Knt.
and Dame Anne his wife, and, for the consideration of Sir Henry, paying
all his (testator's) debts and legacies, &c. , as set forth in a schedule annexed
to his deed of gift granted to the said Sir Henry and Dame Anne all his
goods and chattels except as set out in the said schedule. In this schedule.
he gives to his cousin, Thomas Bartlett, £110 due on account. To Mrs.
Freeman, London, one half of 162 chilver lambs (ewe lambs) and one half of
170 theaves (ewe lambs one year old) depasturing in his ground at Taulton.
Mentions William Barnes, the elder, of Taulton, and gives to him the other
half of his chilver lambs and the theaves. To his cousin, Francis Rainsford,
second son of Sir Henry, a chain of gold, which was his grandmother's ; to
his cousin, Henry Rainsford, eldest son of the said Sir Henry, his white bason
and ewer of silver and two great pots belonging to the same ; to cousin,
Eilinor Rainsford, his wife, £10 to buy a Jewell ; to cousin, Ann Goodere ;
to cousin, William Barnes' wife ; to sister, Anne Woodward and Mrs. Alice
Alder, her daughter ; cousin, Thomas Hooper ; and many others (Probate,
6th Nov., 1621, P.C.C.)
F 2
68 Transactions for the Year 1S89-90.
the heirs of the body of the said Henry, in default to the heirs of
the body of Elizabeth, daughter of the said Hercules and Elizabeth,
in default remainder to the executors of the said William and
Elizabeth the mother. And the said William further covenants
that after the coming of age, or the marriage of the said Elizabeth
the daughter, he will bestow upon her the sum of £500, and that
he, the said William, after the said Henry Rainsford shall have
attained the age of 24 years will deliver to him all such buttons
of gold and silver, and the best salt of silver, with a cover, which
were parcel of the goods of the aforesaid Hercules Rainsford
deceased.1
We do not know the precise date of the grant of the wardship
and marriage of the youthful heir of Hercules Rainsford to
William Barnes, whether before or after the marriage of the said
William with the lad's mother, but it was within a year of the
death of his father, for William Barnes held, on behalf of his
ward, courts of the manor in the 26th year of Elizabeth. There
is every reason to believe that he treated his ward with great
kindness, and protected his interest as if he had been his own son.
Henry Rainsford did homage and had livery of seizen of his
estate and at the King's coronation, 23rd July, 1603, he received
the honour of knighthood. He married Anne, only daughter of Sir
Henry Goodier, of Polesworth, co. Warwick. We do not know
the exact date, but it was soon after 1595, when, as one of the
executors, she proved her father's will, dated 26th January, 1594-5,
and proved by her the 6th May following.2 Pier second son was
baptized in 1599. On the 5th December, 1616, he received letters
patent authorising him to impark and make a free warren of all or
any part of his lands in Clifford, alias Clifford Chambers, and in
Aleston, alias Alveston, in co. Warwick, and the sheriff was
directed to levy £10 upon any person who should hunt, &c,
within the said manor over and above the penalty of £10 reserved
by act of parliament for hunting in parks, &c, to be paid to the said
Sir Henry Rainsford, his heirs and assigns for ever.3 The site of
1 Clifford Muniments.
2 Probate with Clifford Muniments.
8 Rot. Pat. 14th James, Part 2.
Manor and Advowson of Clifford Chambers. 69
the park is well known and it called " The Park " to this day, but
it has been long disparked. He died 27 th Jan v., 1621-2, leaving
issue a son and heir named Henry, who succeeded him, born in
1599, as stated above ; his elder brother, named William, having
died v.p.; the third brother, called Francis, of whom presently.
By letters patent, dated 20th November, 1623, he received special
livery of seizin in the Manor of Clifford and in all the lands which
were heretofore enjoyed by Sir Henry Rainsford his father,
Hercules Rainsford his grandfather, or Charles Rainsford his
great-grandfather, or any other person in trust for them.1 He
married, cir. 1619, Elianora, one of the two daughters and coheirs
of Robert Boswell, of Eastwick, in the parish of Combe, co. South-
hants, by which marriage he acquired, Eastwick. She died and
was buried at Combe, 18th August, 1637. He was knighted at
Tutbury, 17th August, 1624, and was burgess in Parliament for
Andover. He died 10th April, 1641.
In the Inquisition taken at Cirencester on 3rd May, 1641,
before Thomas Harte, Esch., and a jury, the jurors found that long
before his death the said Sir Henry was seized in his demesne as
of fee tail to him and heirs male of his body of the Manor of
Clifford, &c, in default of such issue remainder to Francis Rains-
ford his brother, under like limitation, in default of such issue,
remainder to the right heirs of the said Sir Henry. The jurors
also found that he was seized of and in free warren in all his lan«ds
in the parish of Clifford, ats Clifford Chambers, and in the Manor
(sic) of Aleston, alias Alveston, in the county of Warwick, and
also in the advowson of the Church of Clifford. And they say the
said Henry Rainsford died 10th April last past, and that Henry
Rainsford, Esq., is son and heir of the said Henry in the writ
named and on the 11th May last past was aged 18 years.2
Sir Francis Rainsford, the youngest son of Sir Henry by Anne
Goodere, was of St. Martin's-in-the-Fields, Middlesex. He was
knighted at Theobald's, 22nd June, 1633. He married Mary,
daughter of Henry Ewer, of the Lea, co. Hertford.
1 Rot. Pat., 21st James.
- Inq. p.m., 17th Charles, Part 3, No. 8.
70 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
Henry Rainsford, the son and heir of the second Sir Henry,
though so young on his father's death, was quickly involved in the
political troubles of the age in which it was his misfortune to live.
The great rebellion broke out very soon after his father's death,
and Henry Rainsford, like his neighbours in this part of Glouces-
tershire, who, as pointed out by Mr. Tomes, ante Vol. XII., p. 292,
were eminently loyal, appears to have entered with ardour into
the King's cause, and, like a large number of the other gentry of
the country who staked their lives and lands thereon and lost the
stake to the ruin of themselves and their families, he brought ruin
upon himself. His first step seems to have been to compound
with the Court of Wards for his wardship for £600, for the
payment of which sum the whole of his estates was made over
by the said court to Mr. Job Dighton,1 to whom, on 15th
February, 1641-2, was granted his wardship and marriage to the
ward's use for the sum of .£300, of which £100 was paid and
£200 remained unpaid, and the lands were charged with it,
and a lease of the lands was granted by the court to the said
Job, at the low rent of £100 per annum. Being in arms for the
King at Oxford he was made prisoner, but effected his escape and
petitioned the committee to to be allowed to compound for his
delinquincy, for which purpose he was required to render the
particulars of his estate both real and personal. In this document
it is stated that, under a deed dated 1st February, 17th James
(1619-20), his father was seized to him and the heirs male of his
body of the Manors of Clifford and Ayleston in the counties
of Gloucester and Warwick, and of divers lands and tenaments
thereto belonging of the yearly value before the troubles of £300.
The manor and lands are chargeable under a deed dated 7th
November, 5th Charles (1629), with an annuity of £80 per annum
to the Lady Mary Rainsford, late wife of Sir Francis Rainsford,
deceased, for the term of her life. Besides which engagements
the said Henry Rainsford is indebted to several persons in the
sum of £1000.
He has also six brothers and sisters to be provided for out of
the estate. It is certified that he took the solemn league and
1 Rot. Pat., 17th Charles.
Manor and Advowson of Clifford Chambers. 71
covenant on the 30th October, 16-16, and on 1st October, 1619, he
paid <£900 for his composition.1
By Indenture dated 1st April, 21st Charles (1615), Henry
Rainsford had granted to Job Dighton, described as of the Middle
Temple, Esq., and Richard Quiney, citizen and druggester, of
London, the Manor and Lordship of Clifford, with appurtenances,
and the Hamlet of Ailston, with appurtenances, together with the
advowson of the Church of Clifford, to hold to the said Job
Dighton, his executors and assigns, for the term of 99 years, if the
said Job so long should live, at the yearly rent of one pepper-corn
if demanded, under certain provisoes of trust.2 By a further
Indenture dated 1st February, 22nd Charles (1616-7, Henry
Rainsford of the one part, and the aforesaid Job Dighton and
Richard Quiney of the other part, recites the above abstracted
Indenture of 1st April, 21st Charles, and witnesseth that the said
Henry Rainsford for the consideration mentioned in the before
recited Indenture, and the sum of £578 18s. 3d., all of which
upon account made between them amounts to the sum of £1371
3s. lOd, hath remised and released and for ever quit-claimed for
himself and his heirs unto the said Job Dighton and Richard
Quiney the said trust provisoe in the said Indenture mentioned,
with the intent to make the said Indenture absolute for the full
term of 99 years, and after the expiration of the said term to
revert to the use and benefit of the said Henry Rainsford and his
heirs, and to none other use and purpose whatsoever; and it is
further declared that a fine suffered by the said Henry Rainsford,
in Trinity term3 preceding to Francis Smith and John Beddowe,
of certain lands included in the aforesaid Indenture, was done for
the release and extinquishing of the aforesaid Indenture, and the
said Henry Rainsford for himself and his heirs covenants to and
with the said Job Dighton and Richard Quiney quiet possession
and free egress to and from the said premises during the remain-
der of the said term of 99 years.4
1 Royalists' Composition Papers, 2nd series, Vol. XXI., pp. 187-195.
2 Clifford Muniments.
3 Pedes Fin., 22nd Charles, Trinity.
4 Clifford Muniments.
72 Transaction's fok the Year 1889-90.
By Indenture dated 8th December, 1649, made between Henry
Rainsford, of Clifford Chambers, Esq., of the one part, and Job
Dighton, of the Middle Temple, Esq., and Henry Dighton of the
same place, gent., and Thomas Warren of the other part, the said
Henry Rainsford, in consideration of several sums of money
therein mentioned, amounting to £4,450, conveyed to the said
Job and Henry Dighton, their heirs and assigns, his reversionary
interest in all the Manor of Clifford, together with the advowson
of the church, the mills, free warren, &c, with all its appurtenances.
Thus the possession of the Manor of Clifford passed into another
name and other blood.
Henry Rainsford having sold his estates went beyond the
seas, as appears by certain proceedings in chancery dated 1 0th
July, 1649, and died in East Indies unmarried. Administration
of his effects was granted 5th December, 1659, to Francis Rains-
ford his brother. This Francis was of the Tower of London. He
married and had issue, but it is not our purpose to carry the
descent any further.3
Dightox, of Clifford Chambers.
The descent of Mr. Job Dighton is not certainly known, but
it is supposed by his descendants that he may be identical with
Joabe Dighton, eldest son of Thomas Dighton, of Ashby de la
Zouch, co. Leic, younger son of Christopher Dighton, of Norman-
by, co. Line, but no evidence of this has been obtained, further
than that Thomas Dighton had a son named Thomas, and that Job
Dighton, of Clifford, in his will, mentions a brother of that name,
whom he makes trustee for his two sons. Moreover, the arms
allowed in the Heralds' Visitation of Worcestershire in 1569, to
the Dightons of that county, were painted on two hatchments lately
remaining in Clifford Church, affixed to the wall of the chancel, but
the hatchments being rotten and otherwise decayed, were removed
on the recent restoration of that edifice. In one case they are
quartered with : az. 3 falcons ducally crowned o>; and bearing on an
1 Clifford Muniments " Rainsford v. Whistler.
3 Those who desire further information are referred to a very good
pedigree of the family printed in Vol. II., p. 105, of The Genealogist (first
series), to which we are indebted for some of the facts above stated.
Manor and Advowsox of Clifford Chambers. 73
escutcheon of pretence the arms of Keyt. These are clearly for
Richard Dighton who married Alice, dau. and coh. of Francis Keyt,
of Hidcote, which Richard died in 1738. On the second hatch-
ment is Dighton quartering Keyt and impaling Selman and Lister
quarterly. This is for Francis Keyt Dighton, the eldest son of
the above Richard (see ped. p. 108) There is no monument or
inscription now remaining in commemoration of this family.
Job Dighton married Anne, daughter of William Harswell, of
Coventry, and died in 1659. He left two sons, Job and Henry,
both named in his will dated 21st September in that year. He
bequeathed to the latter the arrears of rent due from certain
property which he possessed at Loughborough, co. Leic, which
had not been paid for above twenty years, and his furniture and
books in his chambers in the Temple. He gave to his son Job a
sum of £100 due from Henry Rainsford, secured by a judgment
bond of twice that amount. Job, the son, however, died in
1669 unmarried and intestate, and administration of his effects
was granted to his brother Henry, who succeeded his father at
Clifford, and by Sarah his wife, daughter of Dr. Richard Bayly,
Principal of St. John's College, Oxford, and Dean of Salisbury,
had issue Richard Dighton, son and heir, who succeeded to
the Manor of Clifford and presented to the church in 1729. He
married Alice, daughter and coheir of Francis Keyt, of Hidcote,
in the parish of Mickleton, through which marriage he acquired,
on the death of the said Francis, that estate and other lands. He
had issue Francis Keyt, son and heir, and three other sons, Richard,
Henry and John, and five daughters. Richard and Henry died
without issue. Of John we shall write presently. Richard
Dighton (the father) died in 1738, and was succeeded in his
estates by his eldest son Francis Keyt, who presented to the rec-
tory in 1732 and 1735, during his father's lifetime. He married
Sarah, only daughter of Daniel Selman, of Old Ford, in Bow, co.
Middlesex, a Turkey merchant, by Sarah his wife, daughter and
heir of Matthew Lister, of the same place. He left issue Lister
Dighton, his son and heir, and two daughters, Alice and Arabella.
He sold, in 1769, under the direction of his father's will, Hidcote
Bartham and the Mikleton lands, acquired by his grandfather's
1 Heralds Visit of Wore, 15G9, Hail. Soc. Pub., Vol. XXVII., p. 49.
74 Transactions foh the Year 1880-90.
marriage, to Morgan Graves, of the last named place, Esq, In
1776 he presented to the Rectory of Clifford as he did again in
1787. This benefice becoming void in 1793 by the resignation
of John Brewer, the then rector, he presented his nephew, Arthur
Annesley, clerk, thereto. Lister Dighton married Mary, daughter
of Foulds, of Bow, co. Middlesex, but died in 1807
without issue. By his will, dated 2nd December, 1805, he directs
that his body shall be buried in a plain and secret manner in the
family vault in Clifford church, as near to his late wife as may
be. Among other legacies he gives to Mrs. Mary, widow of Bertie
Egerton, late of Wednesbury, co. Oxon, clerk, deceased, an annuity
of £10 per annum for life. To Lister Mason, the godson of his
late wife, £50, and to Lucy Mason, his own god-daughter, £50.
To Elizabeth Dighton, widow of John Dighton, Esq., deceased,
£1000. To James Lucy Dighton, Esq., £200. To his (testator's)
niece, Arabella Annesley, £1000. To John Robert Mason, of
Alveston, £50, and to Mrs. Mason, his wife, a mourning ring. To
the Rector and Churchwardens of Clifford, £20, to be placed out
at interest, and the money arising therefrom to be laid out in
bread to be given to the poor on St Thomas's day.1 He gives and
devises to his nephew, the Rev. Arthur Annesley, all his capital
mansion house, (see PL III) manor, mills, messuages, ic, &c, with
all it rights, royalties, liberties, privileges, and appurtenances, and
all other his real estate, wheresoever, to hold all the said estate
to his said nephew, Arthur Annesley, his heirs and assigns for
ever, and appoints his said nephew residuary legatee. The pedigree
of Dighton, of Clifford, is in the Annesley pedigree jwst page.
The property, after remaining vested in the family of Dighton
for five descents, extending over a period of nearly of 160 years,
was carried by marriage into another name, but before following
it we desire to add a few words respecting the family of Dighton
which has now been settled in Gloucestershire about 250 years.
John Dighton, fourth son of Richard Dighton by Alice Keyt,
was of Staples' Inn, London. He married Elizabeth, daughter of
1 The Rev. Francis Annesley in 187*2 made a similar donation in aug-
mentation of this bequest.
PLATE I IT.
x
—
O
i— i
EQ
O
s
P3
O
<3
Manor and Advowsox of Clifford Chambers. 75
John Hunter, of Fort St. George, in the East Indies, and by her
became the founder of the existing families of Dighton, of Glouces-
tershire.
Annesley, of Clifford Chambers.
We have seen above that Lister Dighton, by his will, dated
2nd December, 1S05, bequeathed the reputed Manor of Clifford,
together with the mansion house and all other its rights, members
and appurtenances, and all other his real estates wheresoever in
England to his nephew, Arthur Annesley, clerk, who had been in
1793, upon the presentation of his said uncle, instituted to the rec-
tory of the church. This gentleman was the son of Arthur Henry
Annesley, clerk, D.D., of Trinity College, Oxford, and Vicar of
Chewton Mendip, in co. Somerset, by Alice, sister and coheir of
the aforesaid Lister Dighton. Dr. Annesley was the fourth in
descent from the Right Hon. Sir Francis Annesley, Knt., and
Bart., who held many high offices in Ireland, and on 8th February,
1628-9, was created Baron Mountnorris, in co. Armagh, having,
on 11th March, 1622-3, had secured to him and his heirs male the
reversion of the Viscounty of Valentia after the death of the then
Viscount, to which he eventually succeeded. Lord Valentia was
the twelfth in descent from Sir Reginald de Annesley, of county
Notts, son of Ralph, son of Reginald, son of Britto. By his
first marriage Lord Valentia became the ancestor of the present
Earl of Annesley (the Viscounty of Valentia and the Barony of
Mountnorris having been lost by his eldest son through attainder.
By his second marriage with Jane, fifth daughter of Sir John
Stanhope by his second wife Catherine, daughter of Thomas
Trentham, of Rowcester Priory, co. Stafford, and sister of Philip
Stanhope, first Earl of Chesterfield, he was the ancestor of the
Annesleys of whom we are writing. But this high descent is as
nothing compared with the collateral descents of this family,
which are traced from the Saxon Kings of England, Malcolm
Canmore, King of Scotland, Henry I., King of France, William
Duke of Normandy, the Conqueror, and from four of the six sons
of King Edward III., and many Baronial lines (see Tables post.).
The first of the family of Annesley who settled at Clifford was
the Rev. Arthur Annesley, who succeeded to the Clifford estates
76 Transactions for the Year 1888-9.
under the will of his uncle, Lister Dighton, who died in 1807 ; but
Mr. Annesley had been instituted to the rectory, upon the presen-
tation of that uncle, as stated above, in 1793. It would seem,
however, to be desirable in our brief notice of this family that we
should go back to a somewhat earlier date, on account of a re-
markable incident which still affects it, and will continue to affect
it, in perpetuity.
We all know the celebrated library (now, happily, deposited
in the British Museum) which was collected by Sir Robert Cotton,
Bart., the famous antiquary. In accordance with the will of Sir
John Cotton, the third Baronet, grandson of Sir Robert the foun-
der, this renowned library was purchased and dedicated to the
public use by an act of parliament for the sum of £'4500, which
was directed by the act to be laid out in the purchase of estates
in the counties of Bedford or Hants, in which counties the bulk
of the Cotton estates were situated, and settled on the right heirs
of Sir John Cotton for ever.
Sir John Cotton, the fourth Baronet, grandson of the former
Sir John, died in 1730-1, s.p., leaving his sister, Frances, his sole
heir. This lady married William Hanbury, of Little Marcle, co.
Hereford, Esq., and, by an act of parliament in 1752 was granted
to her and the male issue of her four daughters in succession-
according to seniority, the privilege of appointing successive Cot-
tonian Family Trustees to the British Museum.
The two elder of these daughters, Elizabeth and Frances, died
without issue. Mary, the third, and eldest surviving daughter,
in 1732, married the Rev. Martin Annesley, D.D., the grandfather
of the Rev. Arthur Annesley, the devisee of the Clifford estates.
After the death of Mrs. M. Hanbury in 1796, Francis Annesley,
LL.D., Master of Downing College, Cambridge, the eldest son of
Dr. Martin Annesley, became the first hereditary Cottonian family
trustee of the British Museum. On his death in 1812, the here-
ditaryship descended to his nephew, the Rev. Arthur Annesley,
Rector and Lord of the Manor of Clifford Chambers.
The Rev. Arthur Annesley, the first possessor of Clifford,
married Elizabeth Vere, his cousin german, daughter of George
Manor and Advowson of Clifford Chambers. 77
Booth Tyndale, of Bathford, and of the Inner Temple, heir-at-law
of his uncle, the Lord Delamere, by Elizabeth, daughter of the
Rev. Martin Annesley, D.D., Prebendary of Sarum, Vicar of
Bucklebury, and Rector of Frilsham, co. Berks. By this marriage
the family received a further influx of the best blood in England,
four descents from King Edward III. already mentioned. By his
will, dated 19th May, 1836, Arthur Annesley bequeathed the
whole of his estates in remainder, after the death of his wife, in
equal shares to all his children to sell or retain as the majority
might determine. Accordingly the whole property was sold, with
the exception of the Advowson of Clifford, which was reserved.
The Manor of Clifford was dismembered and sold in portions, the
greater part with the royalties, &c, having been purchased by Mr.
Roberts West, of Alscot Park, co. Warwick, but some portion,
including the manor house, have since been purchased. The right to
the next presentation to the benefice was conveyed by the members
of the family interested to the Rev. T. Gr. Tyndale, who presented the
Rev. Francis Annesley in 1845, and the advowson was purchased
of the other members of the family by the present rector, the Rev.
Francis Hanbury Annesley, as lately as 1872. He has married
his cousin, Marie Charlotte, only child and heir of his uncle,
Francis Annesley, clerk, eldest son and heir of Arthur Annesley,
formerly Rector of Clifford, as above mentioned, and has issue :
Edith Vere, born 25th September, 1863 ; Reginald Cecil, born
15th April, 1865, died December 15th, 1882 ; Arthur Dighton,
born 20th October, 1866 ; Isabel Charlotte, born 17tn December,
1868; Francis Cotton, born 12th April, 1871; Alice Tyndale,
born 25th April, 1873 (see pedigree post).
The Advowson of the Church.
During the whole period that the Manor of Clifford was vested
in the Abbey of St. Peter, the advowson of the church pertained
to it, but it will have been noticed that in the grant of the manor
in 1562 to Charles Rainsford the advowson was reserved.1 After
a diligent search we have been unable to discover the grant from
the crown. It so happens that the volume of the index in the
Record Office to such grants during the period in which this grant
1 Rot. Pat. , 4th Elizab. Part.
7S Transactions for the Year 18S9-90.
would probably have been made are imperfect, some pages being
missing.1 What seems to be still more remarkable, we cannot
find any institution to the benefice from 1494 to 1574, when
the Queen presented, though Ave have searched the Episcopal
Registers of Institutions both at Worcester and Gloucester. On
the 20th January, 20th Elizabeth (1577-8), Charles Rainsford
presented in his full right. How this right accrued we know
not, perhaps it was for that turn only, for by an Indenture
inrolled in chancery, dated 8th May, 23rd Elizabeth, 1581,
Henry Best, scrivener, and John Wells, citizens of London,
sold, inter alia, the advowson of the church of Clifford to Edward
Grevill, of Milcote, co. Warwick, and Johan his wife, and the
heirs and assigns of the same Edward for ever.
Nevertheless, we find that by an Indenture, dated 30th Dec,
1598 (40 Eliz.), also inrolled in chancery, that Sir Edward Greville
sold the said advowson to John Woodward, citizen and ironmon-
ger, his heirs and assigns, and by another Indenture dated 24th
February, 1609-10 (7th James), Sir John Woodward, Knt., son
and heir of the aforesaid John, deceased, sold the advowson, &c,
of the said Rectory of Clifford to John Wells and Marten Freeman
to the use of Sir Henry Rainsford, his heirs and assigns for ever.
It would appear that there must have been some dispute with
respect to the title. This is further indicated by the irregularity
of the presentations and institutions which occurred. It will be
observed that King James presented, by reason of lapse, a clerk,
who was instituted 1st February, 160S, In the meantime, viz.,
on 6th November, 1606 (4th James) an Indenture was made
between Sir Arthur Ingram, Knt. (who now first appears), John
Eldred and Marten ffreeman, before mentioned, of the one part,
and Sir Henry Rainsford of the other part, whereby the said Sir
Arthur Ingram, at the request of the said John Eldred and
Marten Freeman, and in consideration of a sum of money, sold
all that Rectory or Advowson of Clifford, with appurtenances,
1 It appears, however, from Abbot Braunche's Register (Gloucester
Cathedral Lib.) that the abbey presented one Dr. Frocester in 1501, who,
doubtless, was duly admitted, and we have inserted another name found in
the Parish Register.
Maxor and Advowson of Clifford Chambers. 70
which theretofore was held by the before mentioned Henry Best
and John Willes, to the said Sir Henry Rainsford and his heirs
and assigns for ever.
The advowson, after having for a considerable period, exactly
how many years we cannot say, been held in gross, now again
became attached to the manor, and so continued until the manor
itself became dismembered, but it so happened that no one of the
Rainsford lords ever again had an opportunity of presenting.
Institutions, kc, to the Church of Clifford.
1274. id. Dec. Robert le Wise,1 Rector of St. Mary's, by the
Friars Minors, was collated by the Bishop to
the Church of Clifford to hold in commendam.
1324. id. Nov. Thomas de Bradewalle 2 was admitted to the
Church of Clifford upon the presentation of the
Abbot and Convent of St. Peter's, Gloucester.
1344. John Kyngcot 3 is named as Rector.
1349. June 21. John de Wynchecombe4 was instituted to the
Church of Clifford upon the presentation of the
Abbot and Convent of St. Peter's.
1361. Sept. 11. Richard Bundy5 was instituted to the Church of
Clifford, void by the death of John the last
rector.
1391. Feb. 18. William Way te6 was instituted to the Church of
Clifford upon the presentation of the Abbott
and Convent of St. Peter's (Glouc.)
Nob known. John Bokeland.
1458. June 16. Thomas Jolyff7 was instituted to the parish
Church of Clifford Chamberer, void by the
resignation of John Bokeland, same patrons.
1 Bp. Giffard's Reg., fol. 47 (Wore.)
5 Bp. Cobham's Reg., fol. 36 (Wore.)
3 Stratford-upon-Avon Mun. Records.
4 Wolstan de Braunsford's Reg. II., fol. 13 (Wore.)
5 Bp. Bryan's Reg., I., fol. 36 (Wore.)
6 Bp. Wakefield's Reg., fol. 89. He is named as rector in Stratford-upon-
Avon Mun. Records in 1410 and 1413.
7 Bp. Carpenter's Reg., I , fol. 145.
&0 Transactions for the Year 1SS9-90.
1465. Mar. 21. Richard Skardeburgh,1 Bachelor in Theo. was
admitted to the Church of Clifford Chamberer,
void by the resignation of Thomas Jolyff, same
patrons.
1467. Jan. 29. Hugh Chesewell,'2 M.A., was admitted to the
Church of Clifford Chamberer, void by the
resignation of Rich. Scardeburgh, same patrons.
1494. Dec. 2. John Dorseley 3 was admitted to the Church of
Clifford, void by the death of Hugh Chesewell,
same patrons.
1501. Edward Frocester, S.T.P., was presented to the
Rectory of Clifford upon the death of John
Dursley by Abbot Braunch and the convent 4
1542. John Brown,5 Clarke, would appear from the
Parish Registers to have been rector or resident
curate in this year.6
1574. Nov. 4. Walter Roche,7 A.B., was admitted to the Rec-
tory of Clifford, void by the resignation of
(blank), upon the presentation of the Queen
pleno jure.
1 Bp. Carpeuter's Reg., 191.
2 Ibid., fol. 216. He is named as rector in the Stratford-upon-Avon Mun.
Records in 1469.
6 Bp. Morton's Reg., fol. 57.
1513. William Sklatter, chaplain of Clifford, was taxed at vjs viijd. Bp. de
Gigliis, fol. 99.
4 In 1533 Abbot Parker sold the next presentation to the benefice to Sir
William Kingston, Knt., and his son, Sir Anthony Kingston, Knt.
5 Glouc. Reg.
6 1542. Charles sonne vnto John brown clarke was bapt. 10 Oct.
1545. Richard sonne vnto John brown clarke was bap. 14 Aprill.
1550. Hellyn dawghter vnto John brown clarke was bapt. 6 June.
1551. Anne dawghter vnto John brown clarke was bapt. 2 October.
1 546. Thomas sonne vnto John brown clarke was buried 20 Dec1"
1551. Agnes dawghter vnto John brown clarke was buried 26 Decr r.R.
There were several other children of a John brown baptized between the
years above stated, but lie is not described as clerk.
7 1575. Mary, dau. of Walter Roche, minister, was baptized. A Walter
Roche was the Master of the Grammar School at Stratford in 1569, and was
succeeded by Thomas Hunt in 1571 (Stratford-upon-Avon Mun. Records).)
Manor and Advowson of Clifford Chambers. 81
1577-8. 20 Jan. Richard Faune,1 was admitted to the Rectory
of Clifford, void by the resignation of Walter
Roche, upon the presentation of Charles Rains-
ford, pleno jure.
1578. July 2. Edward Vernon2 was admitted to the Rectory
of Clifford, void (blank) upon the presentation
of the Queen.
1585. Dec. 3. Hugh Powell 3 was admitted to the Rectory of
Clifford, upon the presentation of Queen Elizab. ,
by lapse.
1585-6. Feb. 9. Edward Vernon4 re-instated by order of the
Court of Arches, and Hugh Powell removed.
1609-10. Feb. 1. John Salisbury,5 A.M., was admitted to the
Rectory of Clifford, void by the resignation of
Edward Vernon, on 3rd Nov. 1609, upon the
presentation of King James I., by lapse.
1616. John Albright6 is described as rector as early as
this year.
1661-2. Feb. 7. Jaspar Maris7 was admitted to the Rectory of
Clifford, void by the death of John Salisbury,
upon the presentation of Henry Dighton, Esq.,
pleno jure.
1 Glouc. Bps' Reg. - Ibid. 3 Ibid. 4 Ibid.
5 Ibid. John Salisbury's bond for institution dated 20 Dec., 7 Jas.(ltiU9).
1619. Alice dau. of John Salisburie bapt. 3 Aug.
1628. John son of John Salisbury bapt. 8 June. r.R.
6 1646. William son of John Albright, Rector, bap. 29 Sept.
1650. Mary dau. of John Albright, Rector, bap. 17 Sept.
He was, without doubt, one of the Puritan intruders.
7 Ibid. We do not know the date of the death of John Salisbury, but
Jaspar Maris signs the Register as " Minister" early in Dec. 1660. He,
doubtless, was also an intruder, but continued. In the Register of Burials
we find the following declaration : The booke of articles of ye Religion of ye
Church of England I Jaspar Maris Rector of the parish church of Clifford
Chambers in y° countie of Gloucester did read on the Sabaoth day, viz., ya
sixth day of April 1 1662 in the Parish Church of Clifford aforesaid in the
end of morning prayers and do approve allsoe & consent vnto those articles.
In witness whereof I havj subscribed my name. Attested by eight parish-
ioners.
Mr. Jaspar Maris Rector of the Parish Church of Clifford Chambers in
the County of Gloucester, Bach, of Arts in the University of Oxford, obiit
y« 10 day of Nov. and was buried ye 12th aged 71. i'.R.
Vol. XIV. G
S2 Transactions for the Year 1S69-90.
1667. Nov. 18. William Watts'1 was admitted to the Rectory of
Clifford, void by the death of Jaspar Maris,
upon the presentation of Henry Dighton, Esq.,
pleno jure.
1687. Nov. 4. Christopher Smith2 was admitted to the Rectory
of Clifford, void by the death of William Watts,
upon the presentation of William Smith, jun.,
pleno jure..
1729. Sep. 22. Richard Dighton, A.M., was admitted to the
Rectory of Clifford,3 void by the death of Chris-
topher Smith, upon the presentation of Richard
Dighton, Esq.
1732. Aug. 22. Robert Goodall was admitted to the Rectory of
Clifford, void by the death Richard Dighton,
upon the presentation of Francis Keyt Dighton,
•pleno jure.
1735. July 30. John Martin, Clerk,4 A.M., was admitted to the
Rectory of Clifford, void by the resignation of
Robert Goodall, Clerk, last incumbent, upon
the presentation of Francis Keyt Dighton, pleno
jure.
1776. July 19. Stephen Mason, Clerk, M.A., was admitted to
the Rectory of Clifford, void by the death of
John Martin, Clerk, upon the presentation of
Lister Dighton, of Clifford Chambers, Esq.,
pleno jure.
1787. Aug. 18. John Brewer was admitted to the Rectory of
Clifford, void by the death of the last incum-
bent, same patron.
i Glouc. Bps' Reg.
16S2. Mary the wife of William Watts, parson, was buried 28 Feb.
1687. Mr. William Wates buried 21 October, p.r.
2 Glouc. Bps' Reg.
1700. Susannah, wife of Christopher Smith, parson, was buried 27 July.
1729. Mr. Christopher Smith was buried 23 April.
3 He was the son of Richard Dighton, born 10th August, 1705, was of
St. John's College, Oxford, and buried at Clifford, 7th June, 1732.
4 He was rector also of Bucklaud.
Plate IV.
Clifford- Chambers ■*■ Church .
ttcfrrutu6
C'usn/t- HuaU
GROUND P LAN
( before JJtiratwri/.)
( after JSoct&nsii?fvy
12 6 0
I i i I i i I i i I i i i
cale of Feet
12
24
36
John Cotton,
ARCHITECT,
BIRMINGHAM.
ManoIv and Aj>vowson of Clifford Chambers. 83
1793. May 22. Arthur Annesley, Clerk, was admitted to the
Rectory of Clifford, void by the resignation of
John Brewer, Clerk, last incumbent, upon the
presentation of Lister Dighton, Esq.
1803. May 25. Arthur Annesley, Clerk, was admitted to the
Rectory of Clifford, void by the cession of the
said Arthur Annesley, upon the presentation of
the same patron.
1845. Mar. 13. Francis Annesley, Clerk, was admitted to the
Rectory of Clifford, void by the death of Arthur
Annesley, Clerk, last incumbent, upon the pre-
sentation of Thomas George Tyndall, of Holton,
true patron for that turn.
1879. July 31. Francis Hanbury Annesley, Clerk, M.A., was
admitted to the Rectory of Clifford, void by the
resignation, on 24th May last past, of Francis
Annesley, Clerk, the last incumbent, upon his
own petition.
The Church.
The ancient Church of Clifford Chambers is dedicated to St.
Helen. It was of Norman architecture, as shewn by various
remains, and originally consisted of nave and chancel only, with
N. and S. doors, and so has remained to our own time, though
there would seem to be some addition to it made in the 13th
century, external to the north-eastern end of the nave, probably
a chapel, but this has long been swept away, most likely in the
15th century (PL IV..fij. 1). Remains of a pointed arch, about
lift, in span exist in the north wall, the jambs of which were
simply chamfered, but close by, on the east side, is a small shaft
about 4 ins. in diameter, with base and capital, the latter being
enriched with the cable pattern in the hollow. It is difficult to see
the purpose of this shaft in its present position, and possibly it may
have been brought hither from some other part of the building.
The arch has been walled up and a Perpendicular window of four
lights opened through it. This may be an indication of the date of
G 2
S4 Tkan.sactiox.s for thk Veab 18S9-90.
the removal of the chapel. In the north wall, at the western end of
the chancel, was a rectangular low side window, formerly known
as a lichnoscope, but the precise use to which such windows were
applied is, we believe, still an open question among ecclesiologists.
Many symbolisms have been attributed to it. This window, it
may be remarked, commanded a view of the altar
The chancel arch in its original state was low and narrow, as
this feature in all Norman churches were, and the windows were
also narrow, but usually deeply splayed on the inside.
From the 13th to the 15th century no changes of any con-
sequence would seem to have been made in the structure, but
during the latter period considerable alterations would appear to
have been effected. The whole of the fenestration of the church
was changed. The narrow Norman windows were removed, and
were replaced with large windows of three or four lights, with
tracery in the head of Perpendicular character. A tower in the
same style was built at the west end of the nave and a timber
porch was erected at the south door. The font would appear to
be of about the same date. It is peculiar in form, being septan-
gular with a circular bowl 18 inches in diameter and 14 inches
deep. The north door has been walled up, but, probably, this
was not done until a later date {Plate IV., Jig. 2).
Again, about the end of the 16th or beginning of the 17th
century further alterations took place. The roof was removed
and re-erected at a flat pitch, and the walls were surmounted
with an open parapet of debased gothic architecture, which still
remains, and about the same time, or perhaps somewhat later,
other changes, chiefly of a ritual character, were made. The altar,
if it had been removed, as probably was the case, was restored to
its original position against the east wall of the chancel and railed
in, in accordance with Archbishop Laud's Injunctions, There
still remains in the chancel the ancient piscina, which is of a
rather unusual type. It has a semi-octagonal basin, supported on
a shaft attached to the wall. The chancel, previous to the recent
" restoration," was lighted by a large four-light Perpendicular east
Manor and Advowson of Clifford Chambers. 85
window, two single-light windows on the north side, probably
Early English, and two two-light windows of the same period on
the south.
The 17th and 18th centuries saw other changes introduced. A
new carved oak pulpit with sounding board, and reading desk,
were set up, as were high square pews, displacing the ancient
open benches, some few of which, at the extreme west end, re-
mained underneath the gallery in 1884, which gallery it was found
necessary to erect to provide accommodation which had been
absorbed by the great square pews.
Such was the state of the church in 1886, when, from its general
disrepair, Mr. J.Cotton, of Birmingham, architect, was called upon
to examine and report upon it. He found it, from a long period
of neglect and mismanagement, in a condition of great dilapidation
and weakness, and very damp and unwholesome, whilst the cut-
ting away of the north wall of the chancel for the erection of
the Rainsford monument had so weakened the wall that serious
bulging had ensued ; and the practice of burials in immediate
proximity to the walls, especially those of the chancel, had resulted
in serious settlements, endangering the stability of the structure.
The result was a determination to carry out a thorough restoration
of the sacred edifice, and we have all learnt by this time what
that means. Architects are not content with simple restoration,
they must make some improvements of their own, and generally
destroy some of the most interesting and characteristic features
of the ancient structure committed to their charge.
As to the necessary repairs and removal of modern excrescences
we shall make no remarks. The principal alterations that have
been made are the extension of the chancel several feet eastward,
making its length disproportionate to that of the nave ; building
a new organ-chamber and vestry room combined on the north side
of the chancel, with a passage leading to it from the exterior passing
the priest's door, and taking down a portion of the north wall of
the chancel, opening it to the vestry room ; removing the low side
window from its original position and making it to open into the
vestry ; taking down the western wall of the chancel and original
86 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
Norman chancel arch, and building a new arch nearly the full
width of the chancel, "to," in the words of the architect, " better
connect add open up the chancel to the nave, which," he hopes,
" will constitute a very great improvement in the interior." There
is no chancel screen.
The Bells.
There are five Bells in the tower which were all recast by
Matthew Bagley in 1771, except the fifth, which was recast in
1773, as shewn by the following epigraphs. The Bagleys were
bell founders at Chacombe, in Oxfordshire. An account of the
family is given by the same person in "Beesley's Banbury," p. 93. *
1 M. B. MADE • ME : THE ■ LEADER : OF : THIS : PEALE : TO : BE . 1771
2 M. BAGLEY : MADE : ME : 1771 : JOHN : SMITH : WILLIAM : COOKS
CHURCH ■ WARDENS.
3 M. B. MADE : MEE : 1771 : JOHN : SMITH : SMITH : WILLIAM : COOKS
C. \V.
4 JOHN : SMITH : WILLIAM : COOKS : CHURCH. WARDENS : WILLIAM
BAGLEY : MADE : MEE : 1771.
5 AND : NOW : I : HOP : TO : PLEASE : YOU : ALL : AND : SING : TO
THE : GREAT : CREATERS : PRAYS : MY : FATE : HATH : BEEN : UNFOR
TUNATE : BEE : FOAR : MY : SELF : COULD : RAIS : MATTHEW
BAGLEY : MADE : MEE : 1773.
Running borders, as figured 90 and 9-i in Ellacombe's Church
Bells of Gloucestershire, surround eaoh bell.
The Church Plate.
The most rare, curious, and beautiful ornaments belonging to
the Church of Clifford is the ancient Church Plate, which were
brought to licht on the occasion of the visit of the Bristol and
Gloucestershire Archaeological Society to the church on the 11th
August, 1887. With the obliging permission of the Rector and
Churchwardens it was exhibited at the Society of Antiquaries
soon afterwards by Sir John Maclean, with the following des-
cription, where it attracted much attention. And it is considered
that from the rarity of such objects, duly authenticated, it is
desirable to describe it with some detail in the Transactions of
the Society for the information of its members. {Plate V.)
These ornaments very much resemble the beautiful chalice and
paten at Nettlecombe, described in 18G7 by Mr. Octavius Morgan
1 Ellacombe's Gloucestershire Bells, p. 10.
PLATE V
Manor and Advowson of Clifford Chambers. 87
in the Archaeological Journal, Vol. XXIV. p. 73, and, two years
afterwards, beautifully illustrated in the Archceologia, Vol. XLIL,
Plates XXI. and XXII.
" The chalice is 6^ins. in height, and the bowl, which is 4^ins.
in diameter at the brim, and 2^ ins. in depth, is in form like
that of the Nettlecombe example, which Mr. Morgan describes as
" between a cone and a hemisphere, that is the bottom round,
"whilst the sides continue straight and conical," a form, he says,
" which is indicative of its date." The stem is hexagonal, divided
by a knot in the usual manner, the ornamen-
tation of which very much resembles that of
the Xettlecombe chalice, except that the six
facets are flat and lozenge-shaped. The first
of these bears a cross pattee, and the other
five the letters IffSVS in gothic capitals in
sunken panels, which appear to have been
. . ,i j-.,, , .,, i m, c • Fig. 1. Knop or point of the
originally failed with enamel. Ihe toot is foot of the Chalice.
hexagonal, and of the mullet shape, measuring 4f inches from
point to point, these points being guarded by crescents to pre-
vent them from catching in the altar-cloth {fig. 1), the extreme
breadth of the foot being 5£ inches. On the front panel of the
foot is a representation of the Crucifixion, the arms being bent
as on the Nettlecombe example, and there is a sprig of foliage
in each angle at the bottom, but not so full or ornate as in the
example referred to. The ground is roughly " hatched," and,
probably, was originally filled with enamel.
The stem of the chalice and the knot, together with the mould-
ings, which are plain, the Crucifixion, the mouldings of the foot
and the crescents, arc gilt, as is also the inside of the bowl, the
gilding extending over the brim ^ of an inch. This chalice falls
in Fb of the classification of Messrs. W. H. St. John Hope and,
T. M. Fallow. It weighs 11 ozs. and 16 dwts.
The paten is 5f- ins. in diameter, the margin being surrounded
by a plain line moulding with a brim f of an inch wide. Within
this is sunk a six-lobed concave depression about § of an inch
deep. The marks of the centres for striking the lobes still remain
88 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
as on the Nettlecombe paten, and the spandrils are filled with
radiating ornaments, similar to those on the example just cited,
except that there is no central boss. In the centre is the vernicle,
but this differs much from that at Nettlecombe in the form of the
nimbus and in other details. In this case %the nimbus would
appear to be of a lunar form, extending as far as the ears, and
below a circle surrounding the head, which is hatched, but seem-
ingly too shallow for enamel. Beyond this, rays on a hatched
ground extend to the margin of the centre circle. The paten would
also appear to have been parcel gilt, viz., the outer moulding, the
ornaments filling the spandrils of the lobes, and the vernicle. The
weight of the paten is 3 ozs. 16 dwts. 11 grs. There is a. fleur-
de-lis on the nimbus.
With respect to the Hall Marks, this plate would seem to
be unique. There are three stamps : 1. The leopard's head
crowned, the crown being of the earliest type, as pointed out
by Mr. Hope in the Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries,
Vol. XL, page 426. 2. The date letter is a gothic capital R in
Mr. Cripp's Table I., 3rd edition, the same cycle in which is
placed the Nettlecombe vessels under B, which marks the year
1479-80 as the R does 1494-5. 3. The maker's mark appears to
to be an eagle's or a vulture's head. All the marks are alike on
paten and chalice, shewing that they were made by the same
craftesman, and in the same year. The vessels are somewhat
larger than the Nettlecombe examples, both are perfect and in
excellent condition.
Very few articles of ancient altar plate now remain to us. I
believe that ten years ago there were scarcely half a dozen massing
chalices known to exist, but since that date several others have
been brought to light, and within the last three or four years
considerable additions have been made to them by antiquaries,
and especially are we indebted to the energy and perseverance of
Mr. W. H. St. John Hope in this branch of inquiry.
Patens are more plentiful than chalices. They were not in
the reign of Edward VI. and Elizabeth so ruthlessly destroyed as
the latter. The chalice and paten which are now submitted for
Manor and Advowson of Clifford Chambers. 89
inspection are among those of the earliest date. Setting aside the
few funeral chalices found in the coffins of bishops and priests, the
chalice and paten found in use at Berwick St. James, Wilts, in
1879, is supposed by Mr. Micklethwaite 1 to be of the 13th cen-
tury. It is, of course, not hall-marked, nor is there, I difidently
venture to think, anything else to indicate so great an antiquity.
There is a chalice at Hampton Ridware, co. Staff, to which circa
1350 is assigned. The next earliest is one at Gouthland, co. York,
to which the date 1150 is given. But the ealiest dated chalice
with its paten as yet found are those at Nettlecombe, to which
we have frequently alluded above, and these are — if the date
assigned to the Nettlecombe example be correct — just 15 years
older than those to which I invite your attention as, at least,
the second earliest dated altar vessels known to be in existence.
In two respects are these unique. There is no piece, that I
know of, of any other plate in existence made in the same year,
or by the same silversmith.
Besides the ancient plate described above, there are a flagon
and two cups. They bear the hall-marks used for standard silver
between 1697 and 1720, viz., the lion's head erased, and the
figure of Britannia. The year letter is a court-hand V, indica-
the year 1715-6. The maker's mark is Pa, surmounted by a
fleur-de-lis with dot in base, which is the mark of Humphrey
Payne. There is a large flagon at Winchcombe by the same
maker. The flagon at Clifford is of the well known tankard type,
8 ins. high- The cups are bell-shaped, with paten covers, 5| ins.
high. The arms of Dighton impaling Keyt are engraved on each
piece. This plate therefore was, doubtless, presented by Richard
Dighton, who died 1738 (see pedigree, page 108). There are also
two plates of pewter for collecting alms.
Monuments.
In the chancel are some interesting sepulchral memorials, the
most important of which is that to Hercules Rainsford, in armour,
and Elizabeth his wife, dau. of Robert Parry, Esq., with the figures
also of two sons and a daughter. It consists of engraved Brasses,
1 Proc. Soc. Ant., VIII., p. 155.
90 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
which, until the recent restoration of the church, were inlaid on a
slab 4 ft. 6ins. by 1 ft. 10 ins. on an altar tomb at the east end of
the nave, where the deceased probably was buried. His wife
survived him, and very soon afterwards remarried, as we have
seen above.1 The pulpit partially rested on this tomb, concealing
the figures of the children, except their heads. On the recent
restoration of the church the tomb was found to be much decayed
and inconveniently situated, consequently it was taken down and
the Brass was removed and set up against the chancel wall, the
entire figures of the children being exposed.
Hercules Eaynsford (as the name is here written) is repre-
sented bare-headed, his hair cut short and his head resting on his
helmet. His moustache and beard are of moderate length. Around
his neck and wi*ists are slight frills. A gorget of plate reaches to
the chin, the paldrons have their upright edges scroll-shaped,
brassarts of plates, with plain coudieres, protect the arms, and a
cuirass covers the body. At this period civilians wore trunk-hose,
and this was also adopted by men in armour, and the skirt of mail
disappeared. Trunk-hose were large breeches, well padded, puffed
and slashed. As this stuffing was not of sufficient firmness to
protect the thighs, to the projecting rim of the breast-plate or
cuirass, were hinged tassets, which somewhat fulfilled the functions
of the tailles so conspicuous in earlier armour. These tassets
consisted of a series of small plates ri vetted together, and may be
considered to be the last remnant of the skirt of taces. In this
example the plates of the tassets are of a rectangular form. Steel
armour encases the remainder of the legs, and his genouillieres
have elegant rosettes. Large rowelled spurs are screwed into the
heels, whilst the sollerets with very wide toes complete the suit of
armour. Around the waist is a narrow strap, from which hangs
obliquely, another to which is attached, a long sword on the left
side. On the right is affixed a short dagger, or misericorde.
Elizabeth Eaynsford is represented as wearing a close fitting
hood, cut square in front, her hair being brushed back under it,
with a lapet, or veil, falling down over her shoulders behind, and
i Ante p. 66.
PLATE VI.
Tmmi
MkS.lm
. jjjma w^m^wstes .parr? c R^Mww^tiw®
BRASS OF HERCULES RAFNSFORD AND ELIZABETH HIS WIFE,
AT CLIFFORD CHAMBERS, 1583.
Manor and Advowson of Clifford Chambers. 91
a small tight-fitting ruff about her neck, apparently tied with a
ribbon in front, the ends of which fall down. Her gown is some-
what close-fitting about the body and arms, and close at the
wrists, which are finished with small frills. The skirt appears to be
plaited, and is open in front, shewing a handsomely-embroidered
peticoat underneath. A girdle encircles the waist, tied in a bow
in front, and her shoes have broad toes.
The figures stand erect, the lady being on her husband's left
side, they are mutually turned a little towards each other. Their
hands are joined in the attitude of prayer. On the plate beneath
the feet is the following inscription :
Wtxt lies 3Suri?cB theBotHJ? of Hercules ftaintsforO C?squter
ILorB of tin's janitor toijo marrgeO ISltjtoctfje $arn?,
Daughter of Robert $arn?, ©squter, bi? toijome ijabmtg
issue too sonnes anK on daughter DteB tfje seeonB Baije
of August ano Ont 1583, anU in tije j>ear of Ins age 39.
The children are represented lower down on the slab, the two
boys underneath their father. Their hair is cut close. They have
little frills about their necks, and wear long gowns down to their
feet with sleeves hanging from their elbows. Their hands are
joined as those of their parents. Their shoes are square-toed,
Their faces are slightly turned to the left, towards their sister,
whose figure is shewn below her mother's. She 4is represented
three-quarter-faced turned towards her brothers, her dress being
very similar to that of her mother.
Above the head of Hercules is the full achievement of arms
of fifteen quarters, with helmet crest, and mantling. The arms
quartered are those of — 1. Rainsford ; 2. Wylcotes of Wylcott;
3. Wyllycotes of Tew Magna ; 4. Mollins ; 5. Hall ; 6. Glanville ;
7. Lions ; 8. Greene ; 9. Scocathe ; lO.Wakested ; 11. Arderberg ;
12. Purcell; 13. Berwicke; 14. Shershall ; 15. Pratell ; the blazon
of which we have given post p. 99, but the marshalling is some-
what different. Above the head of Elizabeth is a shield Raynsford,
differenced with a crescent, impaling three boars' he-ids, erect, couped
2 and 1. (sett Plate VI.)
92 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
Elizabeth Raynsford, the daughter of Hercules (the little girl
figured on her father's monument), married Edward Marrowe, as
described below, and was buried at Clifford, as was her little
babe a few weeks afterwards.1 She was commemorated by a
brass in the church, two pieces of which are mentioned by Haines
as " loose," and Mr. Cecil T. Davis, writing in Sept. 1885, says :
" the two pieces of brass plate, forming this memorial, are lying
loose in the church," sizes 2ft. Tins, x lOins., and 1ft. 9ins. x 6^ins.
The church has since been restored, and they have now been set
up against the north wall of the chancel. The lady is described
as having her hair brushed back from the temples, and wearing
a French hood of the shape popularly appropriated to Mary
Queen of Scots, but this is nearly hidden by a huge calash which
covers the head and shoulders and falls down behind the back
nearly to the ground. A stiff ruff encircles the neck, but no
frills are worn at the wrists, instead a neat cuff appears.
She wears a large loose gown, and an embroidered stomacher,
peaked in front, relieves the plainness of the rest of her costume.
A slight farthingale supports the weight of her skirts, which barely
reach her ankles. Low thick soled shoes, with a rosette in front,
complete her dress. She is represented standing slightly turned
to her right, and carrying on her right, arm a little babe wrapped
in swaddling clothes. Over its head is thrown a small hood, a
little ruff is round its neck, and on its breast is a plaited bib.
On the other piece is this inscription :
VNDER THIS STONE LYETH THE BODY OF ELIZABETH
DAVGHTER OF HERCULES RAINSFORD OF CLIFFORD IN Ys
COVNTY OF GLOC: ESQVIRE, MARIED TO EDWARD MAR-
ROWE SONNE AND HEIRE OF SAMVELL MAROWE
OF BARKSWELL IN THE COVNTIE OF WARWICK ESQ.
Wn. ELIZABETH DECEASED THE 29 OF OCTOB' 1601. (2)
In Rudder (page 375) mention is made of another piece of
brass, on which is a scutcheon : Baron and femme, argent, a fess
1 Elizabeth, wife of Edward Marrowe, Esq., was buried 29th October,
1601. Francis, daughter of Edward Marrowe, Esq., was buried 7th Jany.
1701. — Parish Register.
2 See Plate VII.
PLATE Vir.
.VNDER TH1&5T0NE LYETHTK BODYOF ELIZABETH
DAVGHTER OF HERCVLES RAftJSFORD 07 CLIFFORD INT "Y
COVNTY OF GLOCiESQVIRE MARIET) TO EdWAJRDMAR
ROWE SONNE AND HEIRE OF S/M^ELL MARROWE
or Barkswell in tfe covntie of Warwick Eso_
w"elizabeth deceased tk %y of OctofjJGoi •
BRASS OF ELIZABETH MARROWE, AT CLIFFORD CHAMBERS, 1601.
Manor and Advowson of Clifford Chambers. 93
engrailed sa. betw. three maids' heads couped proper, for MARROWE ;
and: arg., a cross sable for Rainsford.1 This has now been annexed
to the effigy, but a portion of the shield is still missing (PI. VII.)
SIR HENRY RAINSFORD
of Clifford in the County of Gloucester, Knight,
(son of Hercules Rainsford, Esq.)
Died '27th of January 1632
in the Year of his Age 46.
He married Anne, Daughter and Coheyre
of Sir Henry Gooder,
of Polsworth in the County of Warwick, Knight,
With whom he lived 27 Yeares,
And had Issu three sonnes.
William died.
Henry married Elenor,
Daughter and coheire of Robert Boswell,
of Combe in the County of Southampton, Esq.
and Frauncis
Heiwico (hen charum caput) Herculis
Fil. Rainsforde, Eq. Aur. hujnsque diem
Yixit villa? Domino, ingentis animi
Yiro, nee ideo prudentis aut mitis minus
Ad honesta qua?cumque nato, ad meliora
Regresso fratri Charissimo
(& quod pulchrius)
Amico cum lectissima & luctuosissima conjuge ejus,
Eoromque (Guliel. Fil.) Gooderus tanti vix
Damni & superstes, dum suis & suorum
Lachrymis indulget
Moerentissime,
Moerentissimus P.L.
Nee minus exultat Memoria exemplo
( Charitatis ^ puiHa f Uxor, familia amicorum consensus
Tantae -! Industrial !- rp. . • - Patriae patriseque Colonia Virginia.
( Pietatis ) \ Deus
Nee sibi exoptat allud monumentum. ad
Meliorum famam quam quod tantarum
virtutum, testis sit
HENRICUS GOODERUS.
1 We are indebted to Davis's "Gloucestershire Brasses," (Nos. LXX,
and LXXVI. ) for some of these particulars.
94 Transactions for the Year 1889 90.
Here lyeth the Body of WILLIAM BARNES, Esq.
Lord, whilst he lived, of Talkon, alias Gadlington,
in the County of Worcester,
which he gave to his Nephew
WILLIAM BARNES, Esq.
and of the Moiety of the Mannor of Wincot
in this County and Parish,
which he gave to his Son in Law
(Sir HENRY RAINSFORD,
Lord of the Mannor of Clifford)
He married, and having lived with her 36 years,
died Sep. 24, 1622, aged 76. '
There were formerly two hatchments against the wall of the
chancel bearing the following arms, but having become greatly
decayed they have been taken down. There is now no memorial
whatever in the church of the family of Dighton, except the arms
on the altar plate.
1. Quarterly : Ar. a lion pass, betio. 3 crosses pattie fitchy gu. for Dighton —
2 and 3, az. a chev. betio. 3 Kites' heads erased or. for Keyte. 4 as Mie
first : impaling, quarterly, lit and Ifbh. Erm. on a bend, sable 3 Eaglets
displayed or., Selman. 2nd and 3rd Erm. on afess sable 3 Mullets or.,
Lister. Crest — A lion's gamb or. holding a cross paUe fitchy gu.
2. Quarterly 1 & 4 Dighton, 2nd and 3rd three Falcons ar. ducally crowned
or. on an escutcheon of pretence for Keyte as before.
Upon a marble tablet, surmounted by an urn, draped, is the fol-
lowing inscription :
Samtt
TO THE MEMORY of the
Revd. ARTHUR ANNESLEY A.M.
SON OF THE
REV ARTHUR HENRY ANNESLEY D.D.
WHO DEPARTED THIS LIFE
ON THE 9th DAY OF FEBRUARY 1SU5
IN THE 77th YEAR OF HIS AGE
DESERVEDLY LAMENTED
BY HIS FAMILY AND FRIENDS
HE WAS 45 YEARS RECTOR OF THIS PARISH
AND HEREDITARY TRUSTEE OF THE
BRITISH MUSEUM
Him that cometh unto me 1 will in no ivise cast out. — John VIII., v. 6.
1 This Inscription, as printed by Rudder, must, we think, be inaccurate. The name O
the wife is altogether omitted, though she is referred to, and we conclude the omission must
have arisen from carelessness on the part of the transcriber for the press. The epitaph
cannot now be verified, for the gravestone, unfortunately, no longer exists. Wm. Barnes's
wife was Elizabeth, the daughter of Robert Parry, and relict of Hercules Kuiusford. {See
Rainxford, ante p. Ul)
Manor and AdvowsoK of Clifford Chambers. 95
Also of ELIZABETH VERE
widow of the above
who died 15 june 1s60
in the s7th year of her age and was
buried at torquay
Charities.
An answer to the Instructions sent to the Minister and Church-
wardens of Clifford Chambers in the County of Gloucester
For directions to make an accompt of all Charitable guifts
within the said Parish, to be Registered in the office of the
Lord Bishope of Gloucester, as folio weth :
Imp'8 Sr Hugh Chasnall, Clerke, heretofore did grant and enfeoffe
vnto several Inhabitants of Clifford aforesaid fovver Messu-
ages or Tenements Scittuate and beeing in Stratford vpon
Avon in the County of Warwicke, one whereof is in the High
Street there, now in the occupation of Thomas Nason, one
other of them in Bridge Street there, now in the occupation
of Christopher Wharinge, one other of them in a Street called
the Eeley Street in the occupation of Wield' Parr, and the
other of them in a certain place or Lane called the Chappel
Lane, now in the occupation of Richard Marshall. The
Rents and yssues thereof were and are to be Imployed : (viz*
for an Obit to bee kept in the Church of Clifford aforesaid
on Midlelent Sunday yearely, giveing to the Priest ffowre
pence and to the Clerke Two pence To pray for the Soule of
the said Sr Hugh and all Christian Soules, and towards the
refreshing of the said Inhabitants of Clifford at the said
obit, And in meate for them vpon the Monday and Tuseday
in the Whitson weeke yearely, to be bought after such sort
and as it hath beene heretofore laudibley vsed, six shillings
two pence over and besides Six pence before granted to the
Preist and Clerke there, making vp the sume Six shillings
Eight pence, And the residue of the yssues and Reveanues of
the fnnisses to the Inhabitant" of Clifford and their succes-
sors &, the same to be accompted for And thereupon to be
put into safe keeping And finally to be Imployed it bestowed
in payeinge of Tenths & fifteenths or Taskes hornishingc of
96 Transactions for the Year 1S89-90.
Soldiers towards the Kinges Warr, and such other charges
whereby the said Inhabitants may be exonerate of the same,
or be Imployd in such other meane or weale as by the said,
Inhabitants shall bee thought meete hereafter.
To ye 3 The yssues and profits thereof haue beene made vse of
accordinge to the intent of the doner (except sixteen pounds
fowre shillings & five pence thereof which, in the yeare of
Our Lord 1666, was delivered into the hands of Henry
Dighton of Clifford aforesaid Esq1' by William Case, one of
procto1-8 of the said Parish and resteth detained in the hands
of the said Henry Dighto
Item There is a House standing in the churchyard of Clifford
aforesd called the Church-house built by the Inhabitants of
the parish and anciently enjoyed by the Parishione™ who
in former time granted the same to tennants who paid Rent
to the Proctors of the Parish for the publique vse of the
Inhabitants vntill about nine years past the said Church-
house was seized by the said Henry Dighton, and by him is
still detained, And hath received Six pounds Rent for the
same which Rent now rests in his hands
Item Thomas Jackson of Clifford aforesaid decd gave by his last
Will &, Testament one hundred pounds for a free schoole for
the Children of the Parishioners to be taught by a Schoole-
master, moreover he gave fifty pounds that the vse &, benefitt
thereof should be to the vse of the Poore of the said pish,
and the Executors of the said Thomas Jackson gave other
fifty pounds more to the same vse making vp the sum of
Two hundred pounds with which said Two hundred Pounds
the said Executors purchased Lands to the value of Ten
pounds p Ann lyeinge and beinge in Tiddington in the
Parish of Alveston and County of Warwick, now in the
occupation of William Cod win
Item Henry Toms of Clifford aforesaid dec(1 gaue Ten dozen loafes
of Bread to the value of Ten shillings to be distributed to
the poore of this Parish vpon good Friday yearely for euer,
for pformance thereof hee charged or tied Three Tenements he
Manor and Advowson of Clifford Chambers
97
had within the Burrough of Straforcl upon Avon aforesaid,
now in the tenure of Mr Hunt, hauing the Tenement 0f -^r
Stephen Hunt on the north side, and the Tenernents of Henry
Cawthery in Old Stratford on the south side of them, And
is distributed accordingly
Lastly The Deeds and Evidences relating to the Bequests of the
said Sr Hugh Chesnall and of the said Thomas Jackson are
now secured in the Chest standing in the Chancel of the
Parish Church of Clifford Chambers aforesaid in the said
County of Gloucester. Written and made under the hand
and Seale of William Watts, Minister, of Clifford aforesaid
and vnder the hands of other the said Parishoners the nine
and twenttyth day of October, Anno Domi, 1683, Anoc^ Regni
Regis Caroli Seci in Angt &c. tricessimo quinto.
VChiu-chwardens
J
Bobt Loggan
William Carle
William Smart
George Morris
Exh'30 Oct 1G83
Mem'1"1 There is a Certificate dated
26 Decr 1704 shewing that there
is an exact Terrier of the Glebe
Lands in the Parish Chest.
Wm Watts V^i
The 16u 4s 5d above
mencioned was before
my time, but pceive
if it may be true by
an Inquisition thereof
shewed me and exe-
cuted at Stow before
the Comions for Chari-
table vses.
There is also in this Registry a Terrier of all Messuages <k
Tenements Glebe Lands & other appurtenances belonging to the
Church & Parsonage dated the 26 February 1677. 1
1 See Kelly's Directory of Gloucestershire.
Vol. XIV.
h
98
Transaction's pok the Year 1S89-90.
PEDIGREE OF RAINSFORD, OF CLIFFORD CHAMBERS.
William Rainsford=^Eleanor, da. and heir of Edward Brockysborne.
I
Laurence Rainsford=f=Elizabeth Fynes, da. of JamesLord Saye and Sele.
i
John Rainsford, of Rains-n=Anne, daur. of Sir Humphrey
ford Hall, co. Lancaster. | Stokey, Knt.
Henry Rainsford,of Tew=rElizabeth, dau. and heir
Magna, co. Oxon. Eldest I of John Wilcott, Esq.
Humphrey Rainsford.
son.
I
r
John Rainsford, of=pAlice, dau. of Sir
William Rainsford, of=i=Agnes, daur. of William
Tew Magna. | Anne, of Northaston, co.
1 Oxon.
Wm. Rainsford, =y=Johanna, da.
Tew Magna. Eldest
son.
r
Wm. Danvers, of
Cothorpe, co. Oxon.
2nd son.
of.
Broke.
r~
Wm. Rainsford, Francis, daur. of— Charles Rainsford, of^pJane, dau. of
living 29th Henry Henry Windsore, Clifford, co. Clou. Inq.
VIII. joint executrix to p.m. 21st Eliz.No. 40.
her husband's Will dated Apr, 1578
will, living 1582. died 30th samemonth
John Morgan,
of Camberton,
co. Worcester
1st wife.
1 Thomas Rains-
ford, bapt.* 20th
Aug. 1540, living
25th June, 1583.
=Alice. 2 Hercules Rains-
ford, bap. 3rd Dec.
1544, of Clifford,
died 2nd August,
je. 38, adm° of his
effects granted 3rd
August, 1583, to
Elizabeth, his relict.
Inq. p.m. 26th Eliz.
No. 198.
Elizabeth,
da. of Robt.
Parry, re-
marr. Wm.
Barnes, of
Clifford,
living 1582
i — i
3 Anthony,
bap* Sep.' 1748,
joint executor
to his father's
will. —
Morgan, bap.*
4th Nov. 1555.
r~i
Alice,
bur.* 20th
June, 1578.
John, bap.*
1599.
Frances, Sir Henry Rainsford, of Clif--
bap.*25th ford, ktd at the King's coron.
August ; 23 July, 1603, exr of the will
bur. * 3rd of Wm. Barnes, his stepfather,
October, 1001 ; died 27 Jan. 1631-2,
1576. Eet. 41, bur. at Clifford, m.i.
Anne, dau.& coheir of
Sir Henry (Joodere, of
Poleswortli, co. Wore. ,
living 1621.
r
\Y illiam
Rainsford,
ob. v.p.
Sir Henry Rainsford, of Clifford and of Combe, :
South Hants ; bap.* 24th Dec. 1599, M.P. for An-
dover ; kntd. atTutbury, 17th Aug. 1624 ; died 10th
Ap. 1641. Inq. p.m., 3 May, 17 Chas. No. 105 ; adm°
7 May, 1641, to Frances Boswell, the maternal
grandmother of his children. Adm° de bonis non,
&c, granted 8th Nov. 1647, to John Kingston, a
creditor.
Eleanor, da.
and coh. of
Rt. Boswell,
ofCombe,by
Frances, his
wife; bur. at
Combe, 18th
Aug. 1637.
Henry Rainsford, of Clifford ; bap.* 12 May, 1622, aged 18 yrs. 12th May, 1640;
was in arms for the King and taken prisoner at Oxford, and having escaped,
petitioned Parliament to compound for his estates. Sold the Manor of Clif-
ford to Mr. Job Dighton and went beyond seas, as appears by Chancery
Proceedings, 10th July, 1649 (Rainsford v. Whistler). Died a bachelor in
East Indies. Adm° of his effects granted 5th Dec. 1659, to Francis Rainsford,
his brother.
Manor and Advowson of Clifford Chambers.
99
Arms.
The following arms appear on the monument of Sir Henry Rainsford, in Clifford
Church, who died in 1621-2, but we do not know if they are of authority.
The blazon is printed in Bigland's History of Gloucestershire, Vol. I. p. 386,
and agrees with a tricking in Harl. MS., 1041, fol. 31b, and, generally, with the
Visitation of Oxfordshire in 1574, in Queen's College Library, Oxford, (See
Harl. Soc. Pub., Vol. V., page 165), though from the pedigree the arms would
seem to be incorrectly marshalled : —
1. Argent, cross sa. 2 Az., an eagle displayed ar. ducally gorged and beaked
membered or, for Wylcott. 3. Az. an eagle displayed or. for Wyllycotes, of
Great Tew, Oxon. 4. Sa. on a chief ar. three lozenges gu. for Mollins. 5. Ar.
an eagle displayed gu. for Hall. 6. Az. a chevron erm. betw. three bucks trippant
or, for Greene. 7. Ar., a chief indented az. for Glanville. 8. Per pale or
and az. a cheoron erm. for Lioms. 9. Gu. on a clievron ara. cinquefoil between
three garbs for Scocathe. 10. Ar. a chevron between three cinquefoils gu. for
Wakested. 11. Ar. a chevron Eng. betiueen three escallops sa. for Ardenburgh
or Arderboughe. 12. Vairie ar. and gu. on a bend sa. three boars' heads
couped close argent tusked or. for Purscell. 13. Or. three bears' heads erased
sa. muzzled of the first, for Berwicke. 14. Ar. three bendlets az., on a canton sa.
a lion passant or, for Shershall. 15. Or, three chevronels interlaced sa. on a
chief gu. three p>latesJor Prattell. To this may be added the arms of Goodere
of Polesworth,"(7«., a fess between two chevrons vaire ; vert, a chevron between
three bears' heads erased. Boswell of Combe : ar. a fess fusillee of five gu., in
chief three wolves or bears' heads erased sa. Boswell, three doves ar. Foote,
acquired since the settlement of the family in Gloucestershire.
Mary, bap.* 1556,
bur.* 19 Ap. 1557.
~i — r
Jane, wife of
John Prous, of
Slaughter, co.
Glouc.
Elizabeth, wife of
Robert Wincott, of
Kensham, co. Oxon,
bap.* Oct. 1542.
Eleanor, bap.
Mar. 1545.
14th
1 — i
Margaret, bap.*
19 Jane, 1547.
living unmarried
1578,
Henry, bap.* 10
Mar. 1580.
Edward, bap.* 26
May, 1553, bur.*
2nd Aug. follow -
Dorothea, bap. *
30th Oct. 1551.
1 1
Elizab. , wife of Edw.Marrowe, another son, name
son and heir of Saml. Marrowe, unknown. He probably died
of Barkewell, co. Warw. ; died young. He is figured on his
29 Oct., 1601, m.i. at Clifford. father's Brass. (PI. VI.)
Sir Francis Rainsford, bap.* 14th Sept.=^Mary, dau. of Sir Henry Ewer, of
1601, of St. Martin's-in-the-Fields, Mid-
dlesex, and of ClilFord, Knt., knighted
at Theobald's, 22nd June, 1632, des-
cribed as Captain, adm° of his effects
granted 11th June, 1635, to Dame Mary
Rainsford, his relict, in which she is
described of St. Andrew's, High Holborn.
the Lea, co. Herts. Will dated 28th
Aug. 1655 (in which she is described
as of High Holborn, Middlx.) Prob.
17 Sept. following. Marr. lie. dated
26th Aug. 1629, described as of St.
Dunstan's, West, aged 18, daur. of
Henry Ewer, Esq. , of the same place,
vj/to be married at Edgware.
~l i I — i — i
Many other
sons and
daughters
Francis Rainsford, 2nd son, Deputy Con-
stable of the Tower of London, 1676 ;
Adm" to his brother's effects, 1659 ; died
1 1th Oct., 1678, and bur. in the Church of
St. Peter ad Vincula in the Tower ; Will
dated 2nd Oct., 1678, and proved by his
relict, 27th Oct. following. \j/
* At Clifford.
h2
=Elizabeth, Executrix
to her husband's will,
which she proved 21st
Oct., 1678.
100
Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
ACHIEVEMENT OF THE
REV. FRANCIS
No.
1 Annesley See Blazon
2 Chandos, of Radbourne
3 Han bury, of Little Marcle
4 Cotton, of Ridware
5 Cotton, ancient
6 Ridware
7 folville
8 Wessenham
9 Bruce
IOEdmund, King of England
Fig. 2.
CHIEF QUARTERINGS OF THE
HANBURY ANNESLEY.
No.
1 11 Malcolm, King of Scotland 23
2 12 Edgar Athelin 24
3 13 David, Earl of Huntingdon 26
4 14 Hugh Cyveliok, E. of Chester 28
5 15 Ranclph, Earl of Chester 31
10 16 Brocas & Roches, quarterly 34&35
17 17 Dighton, of Clifford 46
19 18 Annesley 49
20 19 Booth, of Dunham Massey 51
21 20 Egerton 73
Royal Descents of Axnesley axd others.
101
ROYAL AND BARONIAL DESCENTS
OF THE FAMILIES OF
JMmcslcg, (llotton, $ooth, ^gnbale
AND OTHERS.
Waiter de Ridware, of Hamstall=|=Matilda, dau. & heir of Nicholas
Ridware. I Peche, of Draycot, co. Staff. 7
. I
r~
Roger de Ridware, co. Staff. 6=
William de-
Cotou. 5
H
Simon, son of;
Wm, Coton.
1
Walter de-
Ridware.
Joan, dau.
and heir of
John de
Basinge. 8
Walder de=pJohanna
Johanna :
Sir Reginald de^fdau. and heir of
, Huskarle
(a Huskarle
held Clopton of
Wm. Gozen-
boded, temp.
Domesday).
-Wm. =Isabe
Cotou.
la.
Annesley, of co. Notts,
son of Ralph, son of
Reginald, son of Britto
Waldes-
chief.
Sir Walt. =
de Rid-
ware, of
Hamstall
Ridware
co. Staff.
da. & heir
Joan,
dau. and
heir.
9
r™
Edmund1
Cotton,
16 Ed. III.
Sir John Annesley, =p Annora, dau. of
of Annesley, Knt., of
which he had free
warren 12S0. Sheriff
of Derby and Notts,
14-1S. Edward I. ob. 8
Sept., 9 Edw. II. (131 5)
Sir Robt. Pier-
point, ob. 10th
May, 10 Ed. III.
(1336).
i
=Cath- SirWalt.=
erine de Rid-
ware,
aged 32,
1359.
i ' caston. 10
Agnes, da. and heir
Walter Ridware.
11
Elizab.,
d. & heir
of John
Falconer
of Thur-
Sir John Annesley, =j= da. of.
Knt., ob. 23rd June,
31st Edw. III. (1357).
Gregor.
William Coton, of;
Ridware, jure
uxor is.
I
John Coton, of=i=Isabella, or Elizab.
Hempstall Rid- dau. and heir of Sir
ware, anno 12th Wm. Fawkenor, of
Hen. IV. Thurcaston, co.
-J-Linc. 12
(page 104) A
(pcvje 104) B
102
Transactions fok the Yeak 1SS9-90.
Richard de Abrincis,=j=Emma, sister of Williamthe Conqueror.
Hugh Lupus, =
Earl of Chester,
ob. 1101- 29
Ermentrude,
da. of Hugh de
Claremont,
Earl of Bevoys.
Ralph de Meschines,=fMaud, coheir of her
Lord of Cumberland.
31
Richard, E. of Chester, ob. s.p. 1119.
Edmund II., King of England, =
called Ironside, ob. 1016. 21
=Algitha, sister of Edric,
Earl of Mercia.
Edward, called the Outlaw, =f=Agatha, daur. of Henry II.,
ob. soon after 1057- I Emperor of Germany. 22
nephew, Richard
Earl of Chester.
i
Edgar
Athelin,
ob. s.p.
MalcolmIII.=
(Canmore)
King of
Scotland. 23
:Margt. sis. &
heir of Edgar
Athelin.
24-25
Ranulph Bricasard,:
Lord of Cumberland
and Earl of Chester
ob. 112S. 31
Lucia, d. of Algar
Earl of Mercia,
relict of Roger de
Roi nara, E. of Leic.
Alexander
K. of Scot.
ob. s.p.
1107.
David I.-
King of
Scotland
-Maud, da. & heir
of Waltheof, Earl
of Huntingdon,
by Judith, grand-
daughter of Wm,
the Conqueror.
Randolph, =
surnamed
Gernons,Earl
of Chester.
Maud, dau. of Robert
the Consul, Earl of
Glo'ster, illegitimate
son of King Henry I. ,
by Mabel, d. & coh. of
Robt. Fitz Hamon 32
r-
Henry, Prince of:
Scotland, Earl of
Huntingdon, ob.
1152, v. p.
r
Adama, dau. of Hugh
Magnus, E. of Warren
and Surrey, by Eliz.,
da. of Hugh Magnus,
2nd son of K. Hen. I.
of France, rel.of Robt.
de Beaumont, Count
of Meullent.
Hugh
liok, Earl
Palatine of
Chester,
ob. 1181.
Cyve-=pBertred, da. of Simon
Earl of Evereus,
Normandy.
in
l~
— 1
28
Isabella, dau. and coheir.
David, 3rd son, Earl of Huntingdon=T=Maud, dau. and coh._of Hugh Cyveliok.
and Garriock, '
Robert Brus, Lord of Annandale, in Scotland, =
nearest male heir in blood to the Crown of Scot-
land on the death of the Fair Maid of Norway.
Bernard Brus, 2nd son, Lord of Connington and:
Exton, ob. before Aug. 1266. Inq. p.m., 50th
Henry III. No. 51.
26
Constance,
Morteyn.
dau. of
r
Bernard Brus, Lord of Connington and Exton, =f= Agatha, da. of , claimed
ob. 23 Nov. 1300. Inq. p.m., 4 Ed. III. No. 38. | dower 30 Edw. I., Ex. 145.
I
Bernard Brus, Lord of Connington and Exton^Agnes, da. of , survived
aged 26 on his father's death. Died 3 Edw. III.
(1329). Inq. p.m., 4 Edw. III. No. 9.
her husband, ob. 10 Edw. III.
Bernard de Brus, son and heir,=
Lord of Connington & Exton,
born 24 July, 1311; dead 18
Deer., 10 Edw. III., ob. s.p.—
Inq. p.m. 24 Edw. III. No. 76.
^Matilda, da. of Sir
Ralph Crophill.
Inq. p.m., 24
Edw. III. No. 76,
ob. Deer. 1350.
Inq. p.m., 33 Ed.
III. No. 46.
John de Brus,:
heir to his bro. ,
Ld. of Conning-
ton and Exton,
ob. 18th or 19th
Edw. III.
Margaret
Hardres-
hall.
Bernard de Brus,
posthumous son,
b. 1345, ob. 1346.
Inq. p.m., 33 Ed.
ill., No. 46.
Robt. Lovetot,-=Agnes de Brus,:
2nd husb., ob. of Connington,
Sep. 1393. Inq.
p.m. 17 Ric, II.
JN'o. 37.
coheir, aged 19,
Feb. 1357-8.
Inq. p.m. 33
Ed. II. 20
!
Sir Hugh Wesen- Jane,
ham, ob. in Nov. coh.
1375. Plac. Cor.
Rege, 47 Ed. III.
C
pa ye 105
Royal Descents of Anxesley axd others.
103
Peter de Roches, Knt. , the Great
Bishop of Winchester and Jus-
ticiary of the Kingdom, ob. 1238.
. de Roches:
35
Geoffrey de Roches, ob. ante=f=Emma, dau. of William Fitz Roger, of North
1253, nephew of the Bishop of
Winchester.
Fareham and Bradley, co. Hants (1295), heir to
her brother, survived her husband. 36
i ; 1
Sir Hugh de Roches, heir of=p Martin Roche,=Lucy.
his brother Martin, who died
s.p. 1277, ob. ante 1300.
dau. & heir of Steventon,
of Roger ob. s.p., 1277.
de Hoo.
37
John de Roches (at the battle-pMargery, daughter and sole heir of Enfemia
of Falkirk, 1298), ob. 1312.
Caune.
, who was daughter of Sir Herbert de
Sir John de Roches, born circa=pJohanna
12S9, ob. ante 1349.
ob. Sep. 1361.
— 1
Ida de Roches, mar. Sir John
de Plecy (widow in 1354).
Sir Bernard Brocas, of Beaure-=p Mary de Roches, daughter and sole heir, relict
paire and Roche Court, Hered.
Master of the Buckhounds, ob.
1395.
of Sir John Borhunte (2nd husb.) 35 brought
in.
r~
Sir Barnard Brocas, Treasurer^=Johaima, daughter of ? Vernon, of Beligh,
to Anne Queen of Richard II.,
attainted and executed on
Tower Hill, Jan. 1399-1400.
ob. 1429.
Bernard Brocas, of Alton and=pSibilla Croke.
Bradley, ob. ante 1432.
Bernard Brocas, of Horton,=pEmmeline Erwyn, of Bedington, relict of Kin-
etc., Sheriff of Hants, 1457, sell.
ob. 1459.
Bernard Brocas, of Horton, 4th=j=Anne, daughter and heir of Sir John Morell, of
son, ob. 1502. Will dated 24th
July, 1502.
Uunstaple. Brought in 40 & 41
— ■ {paye 10S) L>
104
Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
A.
B
Sir John Annesley, of =f Isabella, dau. &
Annesley, Knt., M.P. heir of Margt.
for Nottingham, 30th 3rd sist. & coh.
Edward III. to 11th | of Sir John
Rich. II., living 1388. | Chandos, K.G.
-J2
=Agnes, dau. of
Robt. Clifton,
Rich. Cotton,
Hemstall, 6th
Hen. VI., of
Ridware.
of-
:Eliz., sister & coh.
Sir Hugh V enables
Knt. 15-16
Thomas Annesley, of-
Annesley, M.P. for
co. Notts., 7 Rich. II.
(1353) living 1413.
of co. Notts.
Sir Hugh Annesley,=j= dau. of Sir
of Annesley, son and
heir, ob. 13th Sept.
2 Hen. IV. (1401).
i
Hugh Annesley, of=
Annesley, aged 8 yrs.
on his father's death,
only son and heir.
JohnBabington
of Chilwell, co.
Derby, Knt.
= , dau. of
William Fitz
Williams.
Wm. Cotton, of:
Connington, 2nd
son, slain at the
battle of St.
Albans, 37 H.V1.
I '
Thomas Cotton, -
of Connington.
a
:Mary Folvylle,dau.
and coh. aged 54 on
her father's death.
Died 14 Mar., 1499.
17-18
i
Thomas
■Elizabeth, dau.
Knightley.
of
_L
of Connington, ob.
9th Henry VIII.
Will proved 1517.
Cotton,=j=Johanna, daur. of
John Annesley, of
Annesley, son & heir,
ancestor of Viscount
Chaworth.
-~ l
Thomas Annes-
ley, of Roding-
ton, co. Notts,
2nd son.
ThomasCotton,=
of Connington,
Sheriff of Hunts
and Cambridge,
1 Edw. VI.
William Annesley, of=T=Mabel
John Parys, of Lin-
ton, co. Camb.
Lucy, dau. and coh.
of Thomas Harvey,
of Helmstoke, co.
Line. 33
Roddington,
heir.
son and
English. Thos. Cotton, of Con -^Elizabeth, daur. of
nington, co. Hunts,
5 & 5 Philip & Mary,
1557. Sheriff of Cum b.
and Hunts, 26 Elizab.
1584, ob. 1592.
Francis Shirley, of
Stanton Harold, co.
Leic. , ancestor of
the Earls Ferrers.
Robert Annesley, of Newport Pagnel,=f Joan, daughter of William Cloville, of
co. Bucks, 4th son, buried there. Will Coldhall, co. Essex.
proved p.c.c, 29th July, 1553.
George Annesley, of Newport Pagnel.=
son and heir, bur. there 17th Jan. 1607.
-Elizabeth, daur. of Robert Dove, of
Moulshoe, co. Bucks.
Robert Annesley, of Newport Pagnel, son and heir, some-
time an officer in the navy and afterwards a captain in
the army in Ireland, and an undertaker in the plantation
of Minister.
^Beatrix, dau. of John
Cornewall, of Moor
Park, co. Herts.
Dorothy, eld. dau.:
of Sir John Pliilipps
of Picton Castle,
co. Pembroke, ob.
May, 1624, bur. in
St. John's Church,
Dublin. 1st wife.
E
The Rt. Hon. Sir Francis Annesley,1
Knt. and Bart, of Ireland. Prin.Sec.
of State, Vice Treas. , Rec. General of
Rents & Rev., and a P.C. of Ireland,
cr. Bar. Mountnorris, of Mountnorris,
co. Armagh, 8th Feb. 1628-9, and pre-
viously had the reversion 11th March,
1622-3, of the Viscounty of Valentia,
secured to him and his heirs male on
the death of Henry Power, the then
Viscount, to which title he eventually
succeded; bur. atMorgansy, co.York,
23rd Nov, 1660. Portrait,
{page 206').
:Jane, 5th da. of Sir
John Stanhope, Kt.,
by his second wife
Catherine, dau. of
Thos. Trentham, of
Rowcester Priory,
co. Staff., and relict
of Sir Peter Cour-
teen, of Aldington,
co. Wore. 2nd wife.
(page 106)
Royal Descents of Annesley and others.
105
C— j
Robert W essenham, of Connington, aged 30 and=j=
more, Nov. 1393. Inq. p.m. 17 Ric. II., No. 37,
ob. 9th Aug., 1st Henry IV., i400. Inq. p.m.
2nd Sep. 1400.
. i
Folvylle, 17 Edw. IV.=pJane Wessenham, coh. of her brothers, Thomas
a Ex. No. 71. and Robert. Died before Sep. 1477. Inq. p.m.
17 Edw. IV., No. 71. 19
~T
Thomas Lucy, 2nd husb. Inq.=Sir Thomas Billinge. 3rd husb., Chief Justice of
p.m., 17 Edw. IV., No. 71. the King's Bench. (Weaver, 268-9).
D-- ,
John Brocas, of Horton
=j=Elizabeth, daughter of Marshall,
j of Dunstaple.
Robert Brocas, of Horton and^Dorothy, daughter of Robert Ruthall, of
Buckingham, ob. 155S.
Wm, Brocas, of Thedingworth,
jureuxoris, 2nd son.
Moulshoe, co. Bucks.
=Elizabeth, daughter and heir of Dexter, of
Thedingworth, ob. 1621. 42
" I
Sir Robt. Cotton of Connington, Knt., cr. Bart., 29 June, 1611.=
(collector of the famous library, which, by his will, he settled
on his grandson) born 22nd Jan, 1570, M.P. for Hunts, temp.
James I., ob. 6th May, 1631, bur. at Connington. Portrait.
I
Sir Thomas Cotton, of Connington, 2nd Bart.,=fMargt. Howard, dau. of Lord
Elizabeth, dau.
and coheir.
34
only surviving son, M.P. for co. Hunts, 1639.
Sheriff of Camb. and Hants 1636, ob. 13th May,
1662, set. 68, bur. at Connington.
William Howard, of Naworth
Castle, co. Cumb., marr. 17th
June, 1617, ob. 5th Mar. 1621,
1st wife.
__i
Sir John Cotton, of Connington, 3rd Barnet, sold the=fDorothy, only child
celebrated Cottonian library under an Act of Parliament
for £4,500 to the Trustees of the British Museum, to be
invested in the purchase of lands in the counties of Bed-
ford or Huntingdon, ob. 12th Sep. 1702, in his 80th year,
bur. at Connington. Portrait.
I —
John Cotton, Esq., only son=pFrances, only daur. and
by 1st wife, ob. 24th March, eventually heir of Sir Geo.
1681, v.p., aged 31, bur. at Downing, Bart., of East
Connington. Hadley, co. Cumb. 45
G (page 107) Portrait.
and heir of Edmund
Anderson, of Stratton
Park ; by the 2nd wife
Alice, da. and heir of
John, Constable of
Dromonby, co. York,
aged 7i years on her
father's death in 1638.
43-44
106
Transactions for the Year 1SS0-9O.
E— ,
Arthur, 1st Lord Angle-
sey, ancestor of the
Earls of Annesley and
Mountnorris.
The Hon. Francis Annes-=pDeborah, dau. of Henry
ley, of Castle Wellan, co.
Down, born 23rd and bap.
31st Jany. 1628-9, at St.
George's-in-the-Field,
Middlesex.
Jones, D.D., Ld. Bishop
of Meath, relict of John
Bowdler, of Dublin, Dy.
And. Gen. of the Excheq.
in Ireland.
Francis Annesley, of Thurganby, co. York., & Bletchingdon, =f=Elizabeth, dau.
co. Oxon. , Barr-at-Law of the Inner Temple. Arthur Earl of
Annesley, his cousin, bequeathed to him all his unsettled
estates, and thus he acquired Thurganby and Bletchingdon ;
ob. 7, and bur. 16 April, 1750; bur. at Bletchingdon, ret. 80.
of Sir Joseph
Martin, of
London.
Francis Annesley, Clerk, LL.D.,
son and heir, Rector of Winwick.
William Annesley, 6th son, ancestor of
the Earls of Annesley.
i i
Francis Annesley, LL.D., Master of Downing College, Camb. , Eliz. Annesley,
M.P. for Reading, co. Berks. Hereditary Cottonian Trustee married George
of the Brit. Mus.
Portrait.
Died 17, and bur. 24 Apr. 1S12, s.p.
Booth Tyndale.
See post p. US,
James Tooker, of Norton Hall, Som. Sometime=
Major in Somersetshire Militia, bap. at Chil-
compton, 2nd Aug. 1752, ob. 8th March, 1S13.
=AliceLucy,born
26th Jan. 1766,
mar. 23rd Nov.
1791, ob. 5th
Dec. 1803.
Arabella,
born 19th
Aug. 1773,
ob. 21 June,
1815, unm.
Geo. Annesley, of=j=
Regent Sq. , co.
Middx., born 13
Sep. 1807, 4th son.
Hered. Trus.Brit.
Mus.
Emily, da. of Alb.
Forster, of Upper
Woburn Place,
Middx. , by his
wife Eliz. Dobree
Carey.
Francis Annesley, :
clerk, M.A., of St.
John's Coll , Oxf-,
son and heir, born
8 Dec. 1800, bur.*30
July, 1882. Will dat.
21 Dec. 1869. Prob.
19 May, 1S84.
^Charlotte, onlyda.
of Henry Hodges
Mogg, elk,, Vicar
of High Littleton,
Som,, marr. 3rd
May,lS36,died27
June, 1837, bur. at
Farrineton Gour-
Emily Vere Annes-
ley, born 21st Nov.
lS39,bap. 20th Feb.
1840, at St.Pancras,
Middlesex.
Francis Banbury Annesley, clerk, ;
born 19th Dec. 1837, bap. 20th Feb.
184 , at St. Pancras. Inst, to the
Rectory of Clifford, 31 July, 1ST!).
Cott. Trus. of the Brit. Museum.
ney, Som.
h
-Maria Charlotte
Annesley, only child
and heir, born 3rd
Apr. 1837, marr. 21
Aug. 1862. 49
EdithVere,
ban. at
Titsey,
Surrey, 15
Nov. 1S63.
Reginald
Cecil, bap. at
Horseheath,
co. Camb., 17
May, 1865,
died 10 Dec.
1882.
Arthur
Dighton,
bapt. at
Horse-
heath.co.
Camb. 16
Dec.1866
Isabell Char-
lotte, bap. at
Atherstoue-
on-Stour, co.
Warr. , 31st
Jan. 1869.
Francis
Cotton,
bap. at
Totsfield,
Surrey,
14 May,
1871
1
Alice
Tyndale, bap.
at Totsfield,
Surrey, 22nd
June, 1873.
Eoyal Descents of Annesley and others.
107
G
Wm. Hanbury,:
ofLittleMarcle,
co. Heref., son
of Thomas Han-
bury, of the
same place, ob.
19th Oct. 1737,
set. 70.
Portrait.
^Frances Cotton, only da. and
heir of her brother, Sir John
Cotton, 4th Bart. By Act of
Pari. 26 Geo. II. (1732), she
obtained the privilege of ap-
pointing successive Cotton-
ian-family Trustees to the
Brit. Mus., with remainder
to the male issue of her four
dans, in succession according
to seniority, ob. 21st Nov.
1756, »t. 80. 45
Sir John Cotton, =
4th Bart. , of Con-
nington &Stretton
Died 5th Feby.
1730-1, in the
52nd year of his
age, s.p.
=Elizab. , da.o,
Jas. Herbertf
of Kingsey,
co.Oxon. Da.
11th Feb.
1731 -2, bur. at
Connington,
aged 42, s.p.
Martin Annesley. 3rd son, Clerk, D.D., 8t.=
John's College, Camb., Preb. of Sarum Vicar of
Bucklebury & Rector of Frilsham, Berks ; born
5th and bap. 14th Oct. 1701, at St. Andrew's,
Dublin ; ob. 4th and bur. 10th June, 1749. Will
dated 17th 'April, 1737-t Cod., 5th Oct. 1742.
Prob. 17th Aug. 1749.
-Mary Hanbury,3rd surviving
daur. and coheir of William
Hanbury. Prov. her husb.'s
will ; born 170S, marr. 12
Dec. 1732, died 20 Dec. 1796,
bur.t 3
Arthur Hen. Annesley, clerk, d.d. ,of:
Trin. Coll., Oxon, Vicar of Chewton
Mendip, in co. Som., in 1764, born
8 & bap. 15 May, 1735, ob. 12 July,
1792,at Chewton. Will dat.23May,
1792. Prov. 27th Feb. 1793.
r~
-(page 10S)~K
=Alice, dau. of Francis Keyt Dighton, of
Clifford Chambers, and sister and heir of
Lister Dighton, of the same place, marr.
7 Nov., 1761, died 29 Nov. 1790, buried*
Arthur Annesley, clerk, M.A., born 10th:
Oct. 1768. Inst, to the Rectory of Clifford,
22 May, 1793, again 25 May, 1803, Heredit.
Cott. Trus. Brit. Mus. Will dated 19 May,
1836. Prob. 21st Feb. 1845. Died 9 Feb.,
Bur.* M.I.
d
Elizabeth Vere, only dau. of Geo.
Booth Tyndale,of Bathford,and heir
of her uncle Nathaniel, 4th Lord
Delemere, born 12 July, bap. there
10 August following, marr. 14 Jan.
1800, at Reading, Berks. Died 15th
J June, 1860. m.i. 48-50
t At Bucklebury.
Clifford Chambers.
10S
Transactions for the Year 1SS9-93.
Thomas Dighton,
named in brother
Job Dighton's
will.
Job Dighton, of the Middle Temple,:
London, purchased in 1649, of Henry
Rainsford, the Manor and Advowson
of Clifford, bur.*30th Oct. 1659. Will
dated 21st Sep. 1659.
-Anne, dau. of
Wm. Harewell,
of Coventry,
bur.* 20 May, 1655.
Henry Dighton, of the=
Middle Temple. Pres.
to Clifford 1661 and
1667. Bur.* 21st Feb.
1687, died intestate
adm° to his son and
heir Richard Dighton,
7th May following,
named in father's will.
Sarah, da. of Rich.
Bayly, clerk, n.i>.
Pres. of St. John's
Coll., Oxon., and
Dean ofSalisbury,
ob. 1667, post
nupt. setts 19th
Feb. 1663, bur.*
Mary, named in
father's will, mar.
John Frogmore.
Job Dighton,bap*
15th April 1639,
bur.* 11 Oct. 1669.
Adm° to his bro.
10 Nov. 1669.
Anne, married
Francis Watts, of
Eastcot, alias
Urcott. Married
settl,9Apr. 1651.
Eliz., marr
Chamberlayne
without her
father's consent —
these named in
their father's will.
Richard Dighton,=j=Alice, dau. and coh. of Francis Keyt, of Hidcote, co. Glouc,
«^« &■ 1-.™%. Ur.-^ * K-.r Kip iiri-Fc Ali/-»o A o n rAi f or nf Siiv YVillinm ftnpiir»pr nf "Yflrn-
son & heir, bap.
6th Mar. 1664-5.
Pres. to Clifford,
1729, bur.* 27th
August, 1738.
by his wife Alice, daughter of Sir William Spencer, of ;Yarn-
ston, Oxon., by his wife Constance, dau. of Sir Thomas Lucy,
of Charlecote, born 10 April, bap. 2 May, 1671, at Mickleton.
Marr. settl. 5 Jan. 1687. Died at Hidcote, and bur.* 3 Sep.
1743.
Francis Keyt :
Dighton, of Clif-
ford and Hidcote,
son and heir, born
26 April, bap.* 18
May, 1699. Pres.
to Clifford 1732,
1735. Bur.* 11
Feb. 1768.
Portrait.
=Sarah, only da. of Samuel
Selman, of Old Ford in
Bow, co. Middx., mercht.,
by Sarah his wife, da. and
coh. of Matthew Lister, of
the same place, born 9th
June, 1705, marr. settlemt.
2 July, and marr. 27 Aug.
1723, died 3rd and bur.*
6th May, 1737. Portrait.
1 — i
Ric. Dighton,
2nd son, bap*
10 Aug. 1705,
bur. 2 June,
1733, unmar.
Hen. Dighton
3rd son, bap.*
31 Jan. 1706-7
bur. 5th Feb.
1714-5.
JohnDigh-=Eliz.
ton, 4th son da. of
bapt. 22nd John
June, 1713. Hun-
ter, of
Fort
St. George,
E.I.
H(?>.107) r
Lister Dighton, of Clifford, son and heiiv
Pres. to the Rectory of Clfford 1776, 1787,
1793. Bur.*ll May, 1807. Will dated 2nd
Dec. 1805. Prob. 20th June, 1S07, s.p.
;Mary, dau. of Foulds, marriage
settl. 20th July, 1793, bur.* 30 June,
1798. Adm° 31st Oct. following to
husband, Lister Dighton.
* At Clifford Chambers.
H-
-H
Royal Descent of Annesley and others.
109
Humphrey de Bohun, kinsman of Wm.=
Duke of Normandy, with whom he came
to England.
Arms. — Az. a bendlet cotised betivecn and
lioncels ramp.
r~
Bernard de Newmarch, Lord:
of Brecknock.
Arms. — Gu. 5 lozenges conjoined
in /ess or.
Humphrey de Bohun-
the Great.
I~
:Maud, da. of Milo de Gloucester, Ear I=f=Sibyl, da. and
Edward de
Salisbury.
of Hereford, 28th July,
1140. High Constable.
Ob. 24th Dec. 1143.
heir.
Humphrey de Bohun, ob. 1187=f Margery, eldest of the coheirs of Milo de Glouc.
r~
Humphrey de Bohun,=pMargaret, dau. of Henry Earl of Huntingdon, sister of
Earl of Hereford.
William the Lion King of Scotland.
Henry de Bohun, 8th Earl=j=Maud, only dau. of Geoffry Fitz Piers, Earl of
of Hereford, ob. 1st June,
1220.
Essex, and heir to her brother William de Mande-
ville, last Earl of Essex, and heir of her great-
grandmother, Margaret, dau. and heir of Eudo
Dapifer. Arms. — Qrtly. or <£,• gu. a bordure wavy.
1
Maud, dau. of the Earl of=f=Humphrey de Bohun, cr. Earl of=j=Maud de Aventye
Ewe, 1st wife.
Essex (1st John) and of Hereford.
4-
Humphrey de Bohun, Earl of^Eleanor, dau. and coheir of William de Braose,
Hereford and Essex, Baron
of Brecknock jure uxoris.
Lord of Brecknock.
Arms. — Az. semee of cross-crosslets gu. a Uonramp.
or, armed flanged gu. (Banks).
Humphrey de Bohun, son & heir, Earl of Hereford=^=Maud, dau. of Wm. Fienles.
and Essex, Baron of Brecknock and Constable
of England, ob. 1298.
Humphrey de Bohun, Earl of Here-=fElizabeth, dau. of King Edw. I., relict of
ford and Essex, Lord of Brecknock, John Earl of Holland,
ob. 1321.
H-
-H
no
TRANSACTION'S FOR THE YEAR 1889-90.
John de Bohun,
Earl of Hereford
and Essex, Lord
of Brecknock, ob.
1336, s.p.
Humphrey de
Bohun, Earl of
Hereford and
Essex, ob. 1361
umnarr.
I
-H
Win. de Bohun. =
a Earl of North-
ampton, ob. 1360.
Humphrey de Bohun, heir of his=
uncle Humphrey, Earl of Hereford
and Eesex, and of Northampton,
Lord of Brecknock, ob. 1372, s.p.m.
rJoan, da. of Rich.
Earl of Arundel
Elizabeth, sister & coh.
of Giles Lord Badles-
mere, by Margaret, dau.
and coh. of Thomas 3rd
son of Richard de Clare,
J Earl of Glouc. , relict of
Edmund do Mortimer.
Arms. — Badlesmere, ar.
a fess betiveen two bars
gemelles gu. Clare or, 3
chevronels gu.
I
Eleanor,
da. & coh.
I
^Thomas Plantagenet,
(called of Woodstock)
Duke of Gloucester,
and E. of Buckingham,
K.G., 7th son, ob. 8th
Sep. 1397
a
John Plantagenet, :
K.G., Duke of Lan-
caster, born 1340,
ob. Feb. 1399, 4th
son.
Catherine, dau. of Sir
Payne Roet, 3rd wife,
relict of Sir Hugh
Swinford, ob. 1403.
r-
Humphrey Plantagenet, Duke
of Gloucester and Earl of Buc-
kingham, only son, K.G., died
of the plague at Chester on his
return from Ireland, 1 Hen. IV.
Ann Plantagenet, sister
and coheir remar. Win.
Bouchier, Earl of Eu,
bur. at Lanthony, Glouc.
=Edmund, 5th Earl
of Stafford, K.G.,
slain at N'hampton,
1403.
Humphrey Stafford, -
1st Duke of Bucking-
ham, slain at North-
ampton, 10 July, 1460
Humphrey Stafford, :
Earl of Stafford, slain
at St. Albans, 23rd
May, 1455.
Anne, dau. of
Ralph Nevill,
K.G., Earl of
Westmorland,
died 14S0.
i
John de Beau-:
fort. K.G., Earl
of Somerset, d.
16th Mar. 1410
r~
;Margaret, daur. of
Thomas de Holland,
Earl of Kent, died
1439.
^Margaret
Beaufort.
Edmund de Beaufort, =
K.G., Duke of Somer-
set, slain at St. Albans,
"23rd May, 1455.
=Eleanor, da. & coh.
of Richard de Beau-
champ, Earl of
Warwick, d. 1407.
Henry Stafford, 2nd D.=j=Catherine
of Buckingham, K.G.,
Lord High Constable
of England, born 4th
Sept. 1456, beheaded
2nd Nov 14S3.
Wydville,
6th dau. of
Rich. Earl
Rivers.
Sir Rich. Pole, K.G.
died Nov. 1504.
i
=f=Margaret,
Countess of
Salisbury, born
1473, beheaded
27th May, 1541.
Edward, 3rd Duke of:
Buckingham, K.G.,
H igh Constable of
England, beheaded 17
May, 1521.
Alianora Percy,
eld. da. of Henry
Percy, Earl of
Northumberland,
K.G., died 13th
Feb. 1531.
J page 112
Henry Stafford (2nd
son) created Earl of
Wilts, 3rd Feb.
1569-10, K.G., died
6th March, 1522-3.
s.p.
K page 11 \
H-
-H
Royal Descents of Annesley anu others.
Ill
Roger Mortimer, =j=Jeane de Genevil, dau. and
coheir of Peter de Genevil,
Lord of Trim, in Ireland,
remarried Wm. de Bohun,
Earl of Northampton.
1st Earl of March,
ob. 1287.
King Edw.III.
Philippa, dau. of
William, Count of
Hainault.
r
Edmund Mortimer,=r=Elizabeth, dau. and
2nd Earl of March,
ob. 1331.
r~"
Edmund =flsabel, da.
i -1 Plantagenet,
Duke'of York
born 1 341, ob.
Jan. 1402, 5th
son.
and coh. of
Pedro,
King of
Castile and
Leon, ob.
1394.
Lionel Plan-
tagenet.Duke
of Clarence
(3rd son), bn.
1338,ob.l3U8.
=Elizabeth,
da.and heir
of William
de Burgh,
Countess
of Ulster.
coh. of Bartholomew
Lord Badlesmere, of
Ledes Castle, Kent.
1
Roger=j=Philippa,
Mortimer,
3rd Earl
of March,
ob. 13(50.
Philippa Plantagenet,:
only child, ob. 1379.
=Edmund Mortimer, 4th
Earl of March, born 1352,
ob. 1381.
da. of Wm.
Montacute
1st Earl of
Salisbury,
by his wife
Catherine,
J da. of Wm.
and sister
and coh. of
Otto de
Grandison.
r-
_j
Roger Mortimer, 5th=j=Alianora, dau. of Thomas
Earl of March, ob. 139S | Holland, Earl of Kent, ob. 1405.
i ,
r-
Richard Plantagenet, =j= Anne Mortimer, sister
Earl of Cambridge, I and heir of her bro.
beheaded 1415. | Edmund.
I
John Massey, of
Dunham, co. Cestr.
Edmund Mortimer.Earl
of March. 6th Earl,
ob. 1425, s.p.
= da. and heir of
Venebles, of Bollin. 53-54
L 1
Tomalin =j=Ellen, dau. Wm.Massey,=f= Alice, da. & heir of
Booth. of Wrotley. of Dunham. Eustice Whitney 55
Sir Robt.
Booth,
(2nd son).
Dulcia, da.
and heir of
William
Massey, of
Dunham.
52
r~
Richard
Plantagenet,
K.G., Duke
of York (only
son), slain at
Wakefield,
1465, Const,
of England.
r~
Sir Wm. Booth, =j= d. & heir
of Dunham, died
17th Edw. IV.
1477.
of JohnFilton
of Bollin, co.
Cestr. 56, 57-66
Cecily, da. of
Ralph Nevill,
Earl ofWest-
m or land, died
1495.
Sir 01iver=pMargaret,
St. John, of sis. & heir
Penmark,
co. Glam.
of John
Baron
BeauchamP
of Bletsoe.
i
Sir John St. John,
son and heir.
Alice, da. of
Bradshaigh, of
Haigh, co. Lane.
I ■ —
George =
Booth, of
Dunham
Katherine,
da. and heir
of
M ountford
67,68
i page 113
G eorge
Plantagenet,
Duke of
Clarence (6th
son).
H-
Isabel, eld. da.
and coheir of
Richard Nevill,
K.G., Earl of
Warwick and
Salisbury, born
1409, died 12th
Dec. 1476.
Sir JohnSt.:
John, of
Bletsoe,
K.B., 17th
Hen. VII.,
only sur-
viving son.
Sibill, dau.
of Morgan
ap Jenkin
ap Philip.
M page 113.
■ H
112
Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
Henry Stafford, Baron-
Stafford by restoration
of, 3rd Edw.IV., died
5th May, 1563.
K
Ursula Pole, only daughter. She had four brothers, the
three elder of whom were attainted, and the fourth,
Cardinal Pole, died 1558, s.p., when she became their
heir.
Sir William Stafford, of Chabsey, Kntd;
by the Earl of Hertford in Scotland, 23
Sep. 1545, 6th in descent from Margt. ,
dan. of Ralph, 1st Earl of Stafford, ob.
1372. She married Sir John Stafford, of
Ainelcote, co. Stafford, 2nd son of Sir
William, of Sandon, great-grandson of
Milicent, 1st Baroness Stafford.
.J
JJorothy Stafford, a Lady of the Bed-
chamber to Queen Elizabeth, had grant
from the Crown, 5th June, 1584, of
Marlwood Park, in Thornbury, co.
Glouc. , with rem. to her two sons, John
and William, in tail male. Marr. 1545,
died 22nd and buried 23rd Sep. at St.
Margaret's, Westmiuster.
Wm. Stafford of the Court
of Queen Elizabeth.
:Anne, dau. of Thos. Gryme, of Antingham, Norf.,
by his wife, Amphillis, dau. of Robt. Themilthorp,
of Foulsham, in same county.
~~ I
Thomas Tyndale, of Eastwood Park, Thornbury, =j=Dorothy Stafford, marr. cir.
co. Glouc, which he sold in 1619. Thomas, son
and heir, in 1619, unmarr. Died 13th Feb. 1671-2,
aged 84, buried at Kington St. Michael, 22nd
following. Will dated 7th May, 1671. Prob. 23rd
April, 1682, p.c.c.
1620, died 20th July, 1664,
a?t. near 72, bur. 22nd July
following at Kington St.
Michael.
Wm. Tyndale, of Milbourn, Malmesbury,=
Wilts, sometime of Stapleton, Glouc,
born at Iron Acton, and bap. at Thorn-
bury, 14th June, 1625, ob. 3rd Nov. 1675.
=Margaret, dau. of Anderson Acheley,
sister and coh. of Anderson Acheley,
of Bitterley, near Ludlow, born 1st
Feb. 1639-40, marr. at Ludlow, 23rd
June, 1665, ob. 17th Jan. 1715-6.
Thomas Tyndale, of Bathford, sometime=j=Elizab. , 2nd surviving dau., born 9th
Collector of Customs at the Beach, Ches-
ter, born 2nd and bap. 6 June, 1667, died
18 Oct. 1747, and bur. at Bathford. Will
dated 16th May, 1747. Prob. 14th Nov.
following.
r
_j
Feb., 1675-6, marr. settl. dated 30th
Dec. 1699, marr. 1 Jan. 1700, ob. 14th
Nov. 1768. Will dat. 26 June, 1763,
in which she desires her children to
quarter the arms of Booth with those
of Tyndale. Bur. at Bathford.
George Tyndale, of Bathford and Bristol, ^Vere Booth, 2nd surviving dau., and
only surviving son and heir, born 29 Jan.
1703-4, bap. at Trinity Church, Chester,
10th Feb. following. Died 12th Feb. 1771.
Will dat. 24th Jan. 1771. Prob. 15th April
following.
f~"
George Booth Tyndale, of Bathford, and;
of the Inner Temple, heir-at-law of his
uncle, Lord Delamere, born 8 Sep. 1737,
bap. at St. Augustine's, Bristol, died 28th
Dec. 1779, bur. at Bathford.
H-
eventually coheir of her brother the
last Lord Delamere, mar. at Kensing-
ton, Middlesex, 27 Nov. 1736, died 31
May, 1753, bur. at Bathford, 50
Elizabeth Annesley, dau. of Arthur
Annesley, Clerk, d.d. (See ante p. 106)
Royal Descents of Anxesley and others.
113
L
l_
Sir Win. Booth, of ^Margaret, dau. and coh. of
M
Dunham.
Sir William Ashton.
69, 70, 71, brought in.
George Booth,
Dunham.
of=pElizabeth, dau. of
Sir Thos. Butler,
of Beauley.
Sir John St. John:
of Bletsoe, son
and heir.
:Margai-et, da. of Sir
Win. Waldegrave, of
Smallbridge, Suff.
r
r
Sir George Booth, =j=Elizabeth, dau. of Oliver St. John,=j=Agnes, da. of John,
of Dunham.
Sir Wm-
Booth, of
Dunham,
died 1579.
Sir Edmund
Trafford.
1 Baron St. John,
of Bletsoe, 1559,
died 1582.
and grand-dau. and
heir of Sir Richard
Fisher, who died 18
June, 1648.
Elizab. ,
dau. of
Sir John
War-
button.
John, 2nd
Baron, ob.
s.p.
Oliver, 3rd Baron=f Dorothy, da. and heir of
St .John, of Blet-
soe, had livery of
of the Manor of
Boddington in
right of his wife.
Sir George Booth, of=
Dunham Massey, cr.
Bart. 1611. Died 24th
Oct. 1652. Bur. at
Bowdon, co. Cestr., in
his own vault, in his
own chapel there.
Catherine, dau. of Sir
Edmund Anderson,
Chief Justice of Com.
Pleas, of Eysworth,co.
Beds. Mar. 1592, d. 13
Feb. 1638-9, buried at
Bowdon.
r
Sir John Rede, Knt. , of
Boddington, co. Glouc,
grandson of Win. Rede
and Margaret, dau. and
coh. of Rich, last Baron
Beauchamp, of Powick,
by his w. Elizab., da. of
Sir Humphrey Stafford,
of Grafton, co. Wore.
Sir Anthony=pMary, da. of Wm.
St. John
(2nd son)
surviving.
Awbrey, D.C.L.,
and relict of Wm.
Herbert, of Crick -
hovvell.
I
William Booth, :
M. P. for Cheshire
ob. v.p., 26 Apr.
1636. Buried at
Bowdon. Funeral
a cert., 4 May, 1636
-Vere, dau. and coh. of
Sir Thos.Egerton, eld.
son of the 1st Earl of
Ellesmere, and Vis1
Breckley, marr. Sep.
1616, bur. 4 May, 1629.
at Bowdon. Fun. cert.
28th May, 1629. 72
Sir John Booth, of-
Woodford (2nd son)
Kntd. 1660, born
1610, died 9th May,
1678, buried at St.
Werburgh, Chester,
loth following, aged
67. Fun. cert.
r~
1
TJorothy, dau.
and heir, died
Jan. 1655.
George, 1st Lord =|=Elizab., eld. dau. George Booth, of=j=Martha, dau. of
Delamere, of Dun-
ham Massey, 2nd
Bart., born 18 Dec.
1622, ob. 8th Aug.
1684, buried at
Bowden.
of Henry Earl
Grey , of Stamford ,
ob. 14 Jan. 1690.
Woodford, bapt.
26 Nov. 1635, ob.
12th Nov. 1719.
Ralph Hawtrey,
of Parley, Surrey,
son of Ralph Haw-
trey, of Middlesex,
born May, 1645, ob.
6th May, 1718.
I
The Hon. Robert Booth, D.D. , Dean=|=Mary, dau. of Thomas Hales, of Howlett,
of Bristol born 1661. Died 8th and
bur. 11 Aug. 1730, in the Cathedral
Yard, Bristol.
Kent, eldest son of Sir Robert Hales, of
Beakesbourne, in the same county, Bart.,
died 4th June, 1732.
Nathaniel Booth, 4th Lord Delamere
and 5th Bart., born 1709, died 1770
s.p., when the Barony became extinct,
and the Baronetcy devolved upon his
second cousin.
Vol. XIV.
114
Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
TABLE OF QUARTERINGS
to which the Rev. Francis Hanbury Annesley is entitled, deduced
from the Heralds' Visitations, Ancient Monuments, and other
reliable authorities.
1 Annesley
2 Chandos of Radbourne
3 Hanbury, of Little Marcle
4 Cotton, of Rid ware
5 Cotton, ancient
6 RlDWARE
7 Peciie
9 Waldesheap, of Boylston
10 RlDWARE
Paly of 6, ar. and az.,a bend., gu.
Or, a pile, gules.
Or. a bend, engrailed, vert., with
plain cotises, sa.
Az., an eagle displayed, ar.
Ar.,abend. sa. betw. three pellets
Az., an eagle displayed ar., and a
chief, vair.
Gu., a fess between six crosses
crosslet, ar.
8 Basinge, of Boylston, Derby Or., six eaglets displ. 3, 2, and 1,
sa., a canton, erm.
Gu., a chev. ar. betw. 3 garbs, or.
A.Z., an eagle display ed, ar., and a
chief, vair.
11 Falconer, of Thurcaston Ar., three falcons, gu.
12 Thurcaston, of Thurcaston Sa., three owls 2 and 1. ar.
13 Ridware Az., an eagle display ed, ar., and a
chief vair.
Ar., three falcons, gu.
Az., two bars, ar., in chief two
mullets of the second.
Az., two bars, argent.
Barry nebule of six, a canton, gu.
And, gu. a chev. betw. three
eagles displ. ,double headed ar.
Sa., a fess dancette betw. three
mullets, ar.
Az., a saltier and a chief, or.
14 Falconer
15 Venables, of Bollin
16 Venables, of Kinderton
17-18 Folville
19 Wessenham
20 Bruce
21 Edmund (Ironside) King of Az., a cross patonce betw. four
crowns, or.
Az.,an eagle displayed with two
heads, sa.
England
22 Austria
Royal Descents of Annesley and others.
115
23 Malcolm (Canmore) King Or., a lion ramp., within a double
of Scotland tressure, gu.
24 Edgar Athelin Az., a cross patonce between four
crowns, or.
25 Edward (Confessor) King Az., a cross patonce between four
of England martlets, or.
26 David, Earl of Huntingdon Or, three piles, gules.
27 Gospatric, Earl of Nor- Gu., a saltier, argent.
thumberland
28 Hugh Cyveliok, Earl of Az., six garbs, or, 3, 2 and 1.
Chester
29 Hugh Lupus, Earl of Ches- Az., a wolf's head, erased, or.
ter
30 Richard, Earl of Chester Gu., crusilly, a wolf's head erased,
ar.
31 Ranulph de Meschines Or, a lion ramp., his tail erected.
32 Fitz Hamon, Earl of Glouc. Gu. three rests, or.
33 Harvey Or, a chev. betw. three leopards'
faces, gu.
34 BROCAS 1 These Coats were usually ga a ]ion ramp, guardant, Or.
o k t* r borne quarterly by ~ ' , , . , i , •
35 Roches J Brocas. Sa., two lions passant guardant m
pale, or, armed and langued,
gules.
Quarterly, or and gu., a bend sa.,
and a label of three points.
Quarterly, sa. and argent.
Az., a cross, engrailed, or.
Az.,on a f ess betw. two chevrons,
or,a stag's head, cabossed, gu.
Ar., a cross betw. four mullets of
six points, gu.
Az., a fess betw. 4 chevronels, or.
Or, a chevron betw. three eagles,
displ., sa.
Ar. a chev. betw. 3 crosses flory,
sa.
Quartei'ly. gu. and vaire, on a
bend or an annulet.
Barry of 8 ar. and vert, a griffin
segreant, or.
Ar., a lion passant betw. 3 crosses
pattee fitchee, gu.
Az., a chevron betw. kites' heads,
erased, or.
36 Fitz Roger
37 De Hoo
38 De Caune
39 Morrell
40 Banbury
41 Cosnard
42 Dexter
43 Anderson
44 Constable
45 Downing
46 Dighton
47 Keyt
i 2
no
Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
48 Tyndale
49 Annesley
50 Tyndale
51 Booth, of Dunham Massey
52 Barton?
53 Massey, of Dunham
54 Venables, of Bollin
55 Venables, of Kinderton
56 Whitney
57 Fitton
58 Moberley
59 Thornton
GO Kingsley
61 Kingsley's Forester's Coat
62 Starton, of Starton, Chesh.
63 Hellesby
64 1
65 Hatton
66 Crispin
67 normanville
68 Mountpord, of Ressote
69 Ashton, of Ashton-under-
Lyne.
70 Stayley
71 Boteler, of Beausy
72 Egerton
Ar., upon a fess gu. betw. three
garbs, sa., a martlet of the
first.
Faly of 6 ar. and az.,a bend.,gu.
Ar., upon a fess gu. betw. three
gai*bs, a martlet of the first.
Ar., three boars' heads erect and
erased, sa., languecl, gu., a
crescent for a difference.
Ar., a fess engrailed, gu.
Quarterly, gu. and or, in the first
quarter a lion passant, ar.
Az., 2 bars and in chief as many
mullets, ar.
Az., two bars, ar.
Paly of six or & gu. , a chief, vair
Ar.,on a bend, az., three garbs, or.
Ar., 2 chevronels & a canton, gu.
Ar., on a bend., gu., three escar-
buncles of eight rays, or.
Vert, a cross, engrailed, ermine.
Ar., a bugle-horn stringed, sa., in
dexter chief, a cinquefoil.
Ar., a holly tree eradicated and
erected in pale, ppr.
Or, a saltier, sa,
Sa., a cross raguly, gu.
Az. a chevron betw. 3 garbs., or.
Barry bendy sinister, ar. and gu.
Ar. on a fess,gu. cotised, sa., three
fleurs-de-lis, ar.
Bendy of ten, or and az. .
Ar., a mullet, sa.
Ar., a chevron, engrailed, az.
Gu.,a cross engrailed, erm., within
a bordure gobony, or and az.
Ar., a lion ramp., gu., betw. three
pheons' heads, sa.
N.B. — The Rev. F. H. Annesley is entitled to impale all these coats in
right of his wife and cousin, and their children to quarter them.
Abbot Newland's Roll. 117
ABBOT NEWLAND'S ROLL
OF THE
ABBOTS OF ST. AUGUSTINE'S ABBEY BY BRISTOL.
Communicated by I. H. JEAYES, Esq.,
Assistant in the Department of MSS. in the British Museum.
On the suggestion of Sir John Maclean and the Ven. Archdeacon
Norris I have availed myself of the kindness of Lord Fitzhardinge
to lay before the members of the Bristol & Gloucestershire Arch-
aeological Society the transcript of a portion of Abbot Newland's
Chronicle Roll of the Berkeleys. This particular portion includes
Newland's introduction, and his Chronicle of the Abbots of St.
Augustine's Abbey, Bristol, from Robert Fitzharding, the founder,
to Robert Elyot, the twenty-first Abbot, elected 28th August,
1515.
As regards the Roll itself, Smyth, in h'S Lives of the Berkeleys,
makes frequent mention of Newland's Chronicle, but, unfortu-
nately, in terms not sufficiently explicit to show whether it was
this identical document he had before him or the original roll in
the Abbot's own hand, of which this must be a copy. For that
this is not the original is plain from the fact that Newland's
death, burial and achievements are recorded in it, as well as the
election of his successor, in the same handwriting as the body of
the Roll.
If any further proof were necessary that this is but a copy
of an older Roll, it is easily found, for having suffered considerable
damage from damp, etc., at the edges, the missing words have in
many places, notably in the preamble, been supplied by an 18th
century hand, and evidently from a much older document, as the
spelling and quaint wording bear witness. This too seems to
prove that when these late additions were made the original
Chronicle was amongst the muniments in Berkeley Castle. It
cannot now be found, but it is possible that when I have completed
118 Transactions for the Year 1SS9-90.
the catalogue of the Castle Muniments, which I hope to do in
the coming autumn, it may be discovered.
A brief description of the Roll is necessary. Tt is written on
paper, and is in two pieces, the upper part measuring 23 ins. by
16 ins., being pasted on 17th century parchment, and the lower
part measuring 16 ft. 6 ins by 16 ins., being much torn at the top
and at the edges. The upper part contains the preamble, or the
Abbot's preface, the Chronicle commencing " Kyng Harri the
first," which illustrates the part taken by Robert son of Harding
in the civil wars of King Stephen, and the marriage covenant
uniting the families of Berkeley and Fitzharding. (The original
covenant is still in good condition at Berkeley Castle). The lower
part contains the descent of Robert Fitzharding and the account
of founding the Abbey, followed by the chronicle of the Abbots,
and, running parallel to it, the chronicle of the family. On the
other side of the Roll is a complete list of the Mayors, Sheriffs
and Bailiffs of Bristol from " William Cannyng, Maior, and Henry
Vyell," vicecomes et primus Bristollie, and "William Combe et
Thomas Knappe, Ballivi [1374, the year in which Edward III.
made Bristol a separate county], down to John Hutton, Maior,
Thomas Jeffereis and Johannes Spryng, vicecomites [1524]. Side
by side with the list is a meagre chronicle of the deaths and
accessions of the Kings of England; for example, "1272 [Anno]
56. Et obiit [Henricus III.] xvi Kal. Decembris sepultus apud
Westmonasterium cui successit Alius ejus Eclwardus primus."
Finally, there are in addition a few historical notes, of which the
following are specimens : —
1520. This yere whete barly and benes where for the more part of
the yere at xxijd the bz [bushel] and above and grete sca[r]sty
of corne was amonges the people. Also the same yere was
beheddid the noble lord Edward Due of Buckingham the
xviij day of May and berid at the Austen Freris in London,
and about Seint Jamis tide whete was at iijs iiijd the bz.
[bushel].
Anno 31. [i.e. Johannis Newland Abbatis]. Isto anno in festo
Sancti Laurencii combusta fuit navis vocata Regent cum
inagno Carricke de Brest supra mare.
Abbot New-land's Roll. llfl
Under the year 1327, where an interesting note might be
looked for, there is unfortunately nothing but the bare record of
the death, and burial at Gloucester of the ill-fated Edward II.,
whose memory will for ever be associated with the famous Castle
of Berkeley.
Hereafter folowith the trewe and noble Petegre of William |lord
Marquyes Berkeley EarleJ of Noty[ngham and grete Eric
Marchall of England] originalli and lineally descending from
the Kyng of Denemark1 [and in the tyme of William]
Conqueror [whos noble Ancestours lordis of Berkeley sithin]
diverse tymes have maryed w* the Royall blode of the Kynges
of Englande [with many other] lordes of this II [ancle of right
hygh estate as here after shall more] evidently appere. This
noble Petegre was compiled and translated out of latyn into
Englishe in the v [yere of the Regne of our soverayne lord
and Kynge] King Harry the vijth and bi John Newlande
Abbot of the Monastery of Senct Augustines bi Bristow [and
where hit is undirstandid of the said John Newland] Abbot
that the devote mynde and intent of the olde noble funda-
toures of monasteries some tyme was [to employe and con-
tinually to mayntene the] service of God bothe bi day and
nyght. And that also the especiall remembrance in prayers
of Religiouse [men shuld be don for ever for all there funda-
tours] and benefactoures. Therefore full moche convenient
hit thinketh me that all Religous men knowe bi [name their
fundatours and especial benefactours] for whom thei ought
most devoutely pray for, whiche for the love of God and in
perpetual almys have geven [and procurid to be geven unto
them grete possessiones and liberteis, And for this cause
movid y the foresaid John N[ewland] Abbot for my more
larger knowledge [and informacion of my brethren Chanons
present] And for evir after to be come have taken uppon
me to put into writing the lineal and trew descent of [Sir
1 See Lives of the Berkeleys (Maclean's Edition), Vol. I., p. 19, Note a.— Ed.
The words v\ ithin the square brackets have been supplied by an eighteenth
century hand,
120 Transactions *'ok the Year 1889-90.
Robert Fizherding the son and eyre of herding] whiche
herding Avas son of the King of Denemarke whiche Robert
foresaide was first created lord of Berkeley [and so lineally
from him I shall continew unto] William now lord marquyes
Berkley for whom And all othir of his noble auncestoures
we ben bounde [specially to pray and as that I shall begynne]
this said noble Petegre First y shall declare Iioav the said
Sir Robert fizherding was first made lorde of the [Barony of
Berkeley and shall expresse folowyngly] certeyue conven-
ciones made atwixe the saide Sir Robert fizherding and [Sir]
Roger of Berkeley [lord and Baron of Dursley],
Kyng Harry the first the iijde son of King William Conquerour had
issue remaynyng on doughter named Mawde whiche was first
maryed unto [the Emperour of] Alemayne whiche clecessid
w*out eny issue of here body begoten. And where all the
othir children of the said King Harry lawfully begoten were
drowned in [the see comyng] out of Normandie And had
none othir Eyre the saide King Harry send for his foresaide
doughter Mawde the Emparice into Englande And in opyn
parlia(ment declared) and ordeyned her to be his eyre. To
whom then and there were sworen all the lordes of Englande
And made unto her sewete admyttyng here for his (eyre,
Amongs) whom principally and first was sworen Stevyn Erie
of Boleyn Nevowe of the said King Harry the first. This so
done this saide Mawde the Emparice was (after mai'yed) un
to Galfride Plantagenett Erie of Angewe whiche begate of
here a son whiche was named Harry. Whiche after was
King Harry the secunde. But (sone after that) Kyng Harry
the first was decessid the foresaide Stevyn Erie of Boleyn
presumed and usurped the crowne And was made King
contrary to his othe And promisse (made unto) the said
Mawde the Emparice. But when then after Harry the Son
and Eyre of the said Mawde the Emparice And also of the
saide Galfride Erie of Angewe was (growen) unto man is
state he wfc his saide Moder Mawde w* a smalle power came
The words within the round brackets are supplied from Smyth's Lives of
the Berkeleys.
Abbot Newland's Roll. 121
ovir in to Englancle And claymecl their right and heneritance
in the vth yere of (the raigne of) the said Kyng Stevyn And
so continued grete discorde and Batelle atwixe them bi the
space of ij yeres And the vijth yere of the Regne of the saide
Kyng (Steven there) was a Batelle made at Lyncolne at
Candelmas where the saide Kyng Stevyn was taken bi the
Erie of Chester And from thens was brought to Bristowe
(to the sayd) Mawde Emparice And to her son and Eyre
Harry, wher then thei were in this wise agreid and finally
accordid that the saide (Steven should regne Kynge) duryng
his life And he that ovir lyved othir of the saide Stevyn or
Harry shuld henerite the Realine and Crowne And so the said
Harry (overlivid Kinge Steven) And then after was crowned
Kyng of Englande And namyd Kyng Harry the secunde
Unto whom in his first entre and werres the foresaide Sir
[Robert Fitzhardinge] gave and lende grete substance of goodes
to the supportacion And maynetenance of his werres, And
when this Harry had obteyned his right he rememb(ered the
great kyndnes and) benefites of the saide Sir Robert fiz-
herding And gave unto him And to his Eyrys for evir the
Barony of Berkley Whiche Barony Roger of (Berkeley,
Baron of) Durseley helde of the Kyng in fee ferme And
for so moche the saide Kyng Harry the secunde toke from
the saide Roger bothe the Barony of Durseley [and that] of
Berkley for as moche as he toke partye w* Kyng Stevyn
agenst Kyng Harry. And also for as moche as he refused
to pay the fee ferme of the Bai-ony of Berkley un to the said
Kyng Harry. But then after the saide Kynge Harry
entretid bi the noble lordes of his Royalme gave ageyne un
to the saide Roger the (Barony of) Durseley as his owne
heneritance. And the Barony of Berkley he gave And
confermyd un to the saide Sir Robert fizherding and his
Eyrys for evir (in recompence) of his grete costes and kynde-
nes. And when after Sir Robert fizherding was lord And
Baron of Berkeley the said Roger lord and Baron of Durseley
(vexed) And troubled with him so grevousely that he came
un to the said Kyng Harry And prayed him to resume his
122 Transactions foe the Year !So9-90.
yefte l ageyne. But then after the saide Kynge Harry
(made) a peace And a finalle concorde atwixe the saide
Roger and Robert so that the said Roger shuld geve his
doughter Alice to wife unto Morice the son and Eyre of
Sir Robert fizherding wfc the towne of Slymebrigge, Under
certeyne condicionys as followingly shalle appere.
This ben the covenantes that wer made atwixe Sir Robert fiz
herding lord and Baron of Berkley and Sir Roger of
Berkley [lord and Baron of Dursley in the] howse of Sir
Robert fizherding at Bristowe And in the presence of Kyng
Stevyn and of the Harry then Duke of Normandy (and
Earle of Angewe and by his assent) and in the presence of
moiiy othirs bothe clerkes and laymen.
Morice the son and Eyre of Sir Robert fiz herding sball2 take(n)
to his wife Alice the doughter of Roger of Berkley Baron
of Dursley And the saide [Roger shall give] to the saide Morice
in mariage w* his saide doughter Slymebrigge whiche is of his
heneritance that is to wete xh wurthe of lande And this
Morice [by consent] of Sir Robert his fader hath geven un
to the doughter of Roger that he shall take to wife for her
dower xxH of lande of the fee of Berkley bi the [agreement
of the] foresaide lord Duke Harry And under this condicions
and covenantes That if so Morice the son and eyre of Sir
Robert fizherding shall happe to dec(esse ere he shall wedde)
the doughter of the said Roger, that then his next brother
and Eyre shall take the saide Alice to his wife according to
all the foresaide convencions And (if soe the second) son of
the saide Sir Robert fizherding shall fortune to decesse before
■s
he shall wedde the doughter of the saide Sir Roger that then
who so evir of the sonncs of the sayd Sir Robert fizherding
shall remayne to be his Eyre shall take to wife the doughter
of the saide Roger. And of likewise if the elder doughter
of the (sayd S1' Roger shall) fortune to decesse afore that she
be weddid to Morice the Son and Eyre of Sir Robert fiz-
1 i.e. Gift.
B " Hath " written over " shall."
Abbot Newland's Roll. 123
herding or to eny othir of his brethren that shall remayne
Eyre (after him that) then the elder doughter levyng and
remaynyng of the saide Roger shalbe geve to wife un to the
son of Sir Robert fiz Herding which levith and (shall remayne
his eire) Furthermore the son and Eyre of Roger of Berkley
Baron of Durseley shalle take to wife in like forme on of the
doughters of Sir Robert fizherding (And the sayd) Roger
shall geve in mariage to the doughter of Sir Robert fizherding
for her dowery the maner of Siston of Bristow the whiche
maner is of (the heneritance of the) saide Roger, And Sir
Robert fizharding shall geve in mariage wfc his doughter to
the son of the saide Roger x11 and xs wurthe of lande at
(Dursley And with) this condicion, that if on of the doughters
of Robert fizherding decesse afore she be weddid to the son
and eyre of the saide (Roger, that then the othir doughter
of) the saide Sir Robert fiz Herding shalbe geven wife unto
him. And if hit so shall fortune that bothe the doughters of
Sir Robert fiz (Herding decesse afore eny of them bee) maried
un to the Son and Eyre of the saide Roger, that then his Eyre
shalle take to wife the doughter of Hew of Hasele Nece of
the saide (Sr Robert fiz Herding) Of like wise if the first goten
Son and Eyre of Roger of Berkley Baron of Dursele decesse
afore that he marye w* eny of the doughteres of (Sir Robert
fiz Herding) or of the saide Hew of Hasele then that brothir
that shall remayne to be Eyre of the said Roger shalle take to
wife on of the doughteres of the saide Sir (Robert fiz Herding)
And if thei decesse all or that eny of them shalbe maried,
that then the Eyre of the saide Roger shall take to his wife
the doughter of the said Hewe (of Hasele nece of the) saide
Sir Robert fiz Herding according unto all the foresaide coven-
antes And all thes foresaide covenantes have sworen feithfully
to holde, kepe (and performe without) eny fraude or deceyt the
foresaide Sir Robert fiz Herding And Roger of Berkley Baron
of Durseley, And thei have putte Harry Duke of Normandy
(aforesaid for plegge) and for juge atwixe them of all thes
foresaide Covenantes trewly to be performyd atwixe them.
To thes Covenantes wele and trewly to be observed (have
124 Transactions for the Year 1S89-90.
sworen also) viij noble men of the party of Sir Robert fiz
Herding. And also other viij noble men of the party of the
saide Roger, whos names ben thes of the party (of the sayd
Roger, William) the son of Duke Harry of Normandie afore-
saide, Roger of Shay, Rafe of Iweley, Walberyne, Eng(ewald)
of Gosynton, Guydo of Sto(ne, Gwafere of Planca) Hew of
Planca his brothir. And of the partye of Sir Robert fiz
Herding thes ben their names, Hew of Hasele, Nigelle fiz
Arthure (Robert of St. Maryes, Elias) the brother of Sir
Robert fiz Herding and Jordane his brothir, Jordane le
Fayre, Richard fiz Robert And David Duncepouche, And
(thes foresayd men with all their) strenght shall holde and
kepe the foresaide Sir Robert fiz Herding And Roger in all
thes foresaide covenantes trewly to be observyd (that if soe
the foresaid Robert) And Roger would go from the foresaide
covenantes thei shall constrayne them wfc all their power and
myght (to hold and kepe them, And if they) wulde at eny
tyme dissent, these foresaide [Noble men] of their service
and love shalle reduce them therunto And for thes (cove-
nantes aforesaid wreten, the foresayd) Roger of Berkley,
Baron of Durseley hathe relesid And quyete claymed al
maner of chalange and right that he had in the Fee (ferme
of the Barony of Berkeley).
Herding (son) of the Kyng of (Denmark) had issue bi his (wife)
Hvida iij [v] sdnnes (and iij) doughters as hit . . . folowingly
and (deceased at Bristoll the) vj day of Nov(ember) 1115.
Robert (fiz) Herding first (lord of) Berkeley (primer fundatour)
and chanon (of the Monastery) of Seint Aug(ustine's bi Bris-
towe) had issue as (apperes folow)yngly and (died the fifth
day of) February (in the) seventeenth yere of Henry II.),
yere of our lord (1170) and was beriecl atwixe (the Abbots
and) Priores stalles (and) nexte un to the Abbotes stalle in
the intreying into the qwere.
This goode lorde primers fundatour and Chanon of the Monastery
of Seint Augustines bi Bristowe began the fundacion of the
Abbot Newland's Roll. 125
same in the yere of our lord M.c xl. And bilded the churche
And all othir howses of offices according to the same bi the
space of vj yeres. And so after in the yere of our lord
M.c xlvi Robertus Bisshoppe of Worcetr Boniface Bisshoppe
of Excetr Nicholas Bisshoppe of Landaf And Gregorie
Bisshoppe of Seint Asse 1 dedicate the churche of the saide
Monastery. And then after Alured Bisshoppe of Worcetr
inducte vj chanons of the Monastery of Wigmore gederid
And chosen by Sir Robert fiz Herding our fundatour in to
our churche and Monastery aforesaide on the Ester day
whiche was that yere the xj day of Aprile And in the yere
of our lord M.c.xlviij.
[That this Sir Robert fiz Herding first lord of Berk[eley primer]
Fundatour of our monastery of Seint Augustines
chanon of the same hit so apperith bi his Obite (which) is
yerely in our chapiter house in this forme .... Robert fiz
Herding Chanon And our fundatour , his son and
Eyre Morice secunde lord of [Berkeley's] charter on this
wise writen. Be hit that y Morice the son and Eyre
of Sir [Robert fiz Herding have] grawnted And confermed
for my Sowle [and the sowles of my] Auncetry to the churche
of Seint Augustines bi Bristowe whiche my lorde
And fader hath funded all suche thinges whiche my saide
fader hath geven And graunted to the cha(nons) of the same
Churche of Seint Augustines that is to wete Berkley-hurnys,
Almondesbery, Horefeld, Asshelwurth and the whiche he
gave un to them when he became and w . . . a chanon, And
every of them w* all their appertinences.J
And for this good lorde Sir Robert fiz Herding oure primer
fundatour And the goode lady Dame Eve his wife this ben
the speciall thinges done for them besides the generall
prayers continually done in divine service bi day and nyght.
First thei bene prayed fore dayly bi name opynly in oure
Chapiter-howse. Also thei have their Placebo and Dirige
1 St. Asaph ?— Ed.
126 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
solennely songe with Ryngyng in the Eve of their Anni-
versary And on the morowe commendaciones And Masse.
The Abbot for the fundatour And the Prior for the fundresse
executing the service And on the day of our saide fundatour
is Anniversarye ther shalbe c. poore men refresshid in a doole
made un to them in this forme, Every man of them shall
have a Chanon is lofe of bred callid a Myche1 And iii
Herynges therwith. Ther shalbe delid amonges them also ij
busshellis of pesis. An other doole also that day shalbe made
in money, cakes and loves of iij to a peny under this forme.
The Abbot shalle have a Cake price of iiijd with ij castes of
bred and iiijd for wyne. Also the Priour, the Suppriour
And the Amener eviry of them shall have ij Cakes price for
every Cake ijd w* j caste of bred And ijd for wyne And every
Chanon after bothe of Prestes and also of Novices shall
have a Cake of ijd with a caste of bred And ijd for wyne.
More ovir eviry seculer servande of howsehold within the
monastery shall have a cake of jd And a caste of bred. Also
every Frere in every howse of the iiij orders of Bristowe
shalle have a lofe. And in like wise every Prisoner within the
Gaole of Newgate in Bristowe. And all the remanet of bred
not divided shalbe delyd at the yate of oure saide Monastery
un to pore people. And every man takyng parte of this doole
shalle have xl. dayes of Pardone. And in the day of the
Anniversary of Dame Eve oure funderesse a doole shalbe
■I
made under this forme. That day shalbe delyd un to 1. poore
men 1. lofes callid miches And un to every of them iij
herynges. And amonges them all shalbe delyd also j bushell
of Peses.
Hereafter folowyngly shalle appere the names of all the Abbotes
of our foresaide Monastery.
Richarde the first Abbot of oure Monastery was inducte on
Esterday and the xj day of Aprile in the yere of oure Lord
M.c.xlviij. And the xj yere of the Regne of King Stevyn.
And rewlyd xxxviij yeres And decessid the iiijth day of
XX
September And is beried the yer of our Lord m.c iiij vj.
1 Myehe=a loaf of bread.
Abbot Newland's Roll. 127
John the Secunde Abbot succedid And rewlid xxix yeris And
decessid the xij day of February the yere of our Lord M.cc.xvj
Joseph was electe Abbot and decessid the xvij day of September
And is beried under a marbill stone.
This Joseph livid after his Election xxxj wekes and so
decessid a fore he was installid, the yere of our Lord M.ccxvj.
David the iijde Abbot succedid And rewlid xix yeris And decessid
the iij day of Jule And is beried under a Marbull Stone
with a hedde And a Crosse made of the same in the elder
chapelle of oure Lady the yere of our Lord M ccl iij.
This Abbot David resigned And William of Bradstone suc-
cedid him and was electe the xxi clay of May the yere of our
Lord M.cc.xxxiiij.
William of Bradstone the iiijth Abbot succedid And rewlid viij
yeris And decessid the xx day of May the yere of our Lord
Mcc.lii.
This Abbot William of Bradstone resigned And William
Longe succedid him and was electe the x day of August the
yer of our Lord M.cc.xlii
William Longe the 6th Abbot succedid And rewlid xxij yeres
And decessid the xvii day of May the yere of our Lord
M.cc.lxiiij. And is beryed afore the Image of our Lady at
the North He of our Monastery of the lifte hand of Hew
Dadyngton the viijth Abbot.
Richard of Malmesbery the vj Abbot succedid And rewlid xij
yeris And decessid the xiij clay of September the yere of our
Lord M.cc.lxxvj.
John de Marina the vijth Abbot succedid And rewlid x yeris
And decessid the xxj day of February the yere of our Lord
XX *
Mcciiij vj. And lythe beried in oure Chapiter House.
Hew of Dadyngtone the viijtb Abhot succedid and rewlid viij
yeris And decessid the xxvj day of November and is beried
streight afore the Image of our Lady in the crosse North He
XX
atwixe othir ij Abbotes, The yere of our Lorde M. cc.iiij xiiij.
128 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
Jamys Barry the ixth Abbot succedid and rewlid xij yeris. And
decessid tlie xij day of November the yere of oure Lord
M.ccc.vj And lythe beried under a marbull stone on the
southe side of the Rode Auter under the Arche there.
Edmund of Knulle the xth Abbot succedid electe on Seint Thomas
day the Apostell And rewlid xxvj yeris And decessid the ix
day of June the yere of our Lord M.ccc xxxii And lythe
beried under a brode marbull stone streight afore the Rode
Auter.
This reverende fader Abbot Edmunde causid mony notable dedis
done in his tyme, First he bilded the churche of the new fro
the Fundamentes wfc the vestrary And began that grete
werke the 6th day after the Assumption of our lady at the
XX
oure of ix. The yere of our Lord M.cc.iiij xviij. E. then
dominica letter. The yere also of King Edwarde the first
xxv. He bilde also of the new from the Fundamentes the
Kynges Hall And also the Kynges Chamber. Also he reparid
And kevered the Freytoure w1 othir goode dedis.
John Snowe the xjth Abbot succedid and was electe the xvij day
of June And rewlid ix yeris and decessid the iij day of July
And lythe beried under a brode marbulle Stone in the intre
in to the Rode Auter.
Rafe of Asshe the xijtb Abbot succeedid And rewlid xij yeres
Electe the xviij day of July And decessid the first day of
M arche. The yere of oure Lorde M.ccc. liij. And lythe beried
in the myddis of the qwere within the Gryce afore the
yongest Novices Stalles.
William Coke the xiijth Abbot succedid and rewlid xiij yeres
And resigned the first day of October the yere of oure Lord
M.ccclxv And decessid the viij day of Aprile the yere of our
Lord M ccc.lxvj. And is beried in the space a fore the dore
intreyng in to oure Lady chapell above the high Awter.
Harry Shalyngforde othirwise namyd Blebury the xiiijth Abbot
succedid And rewlid xxiij yeres And decessid the ijde day of
XX
December the yere of our Lord M ccc iiij viij And lythe beried
Abbot Newland's Roll. 129
in the nethir Tumbe of the Presbitery whiche he caused to
be made besides the high Auter.
John Cernay the xvth Abbot succedid and Electe the xiiij day of
January. And rewlid v. yeris And decessid the v. day of
October And lythe beried in the ovir Tumbe of the foresaide
presbitery the yere of our lord m.ccc iiij xiij.
John Dawboney the xvjth Abbot succedid electe the xxv. day of
XX
October the yere of our lord M.ccc.iiij xiij. And rewlid xxxv.
yeres And decessid the xvj clay of January the yer of our
lord M ccc xxviij Aud lythe beried in the high tumbe of the
north side of the Rode Awter.
Walter Newbery the xvijth Abbot succedid electe the xxv day of
February And decessid the iij day of September the yere of
oure Lord M.cccc.lxiii And so rewlid xlvj yeris And is beried
in the ovir Arche of our Lady Chapelle on the northe side
of the Auter.
This wurshipfull fader Abbot Walter Newbery dyd mony grete
actes in his tyme in bilding of the maner of Fifhide in
Dorsetshire Also in diverse houses of office at the Maner of
Lygh in Somersetshire Also in diverse Howsynges at the
Maner of Almonclesbery And also new bilded the Maner of
Asshelworth in Glouceturshire with othir diverse Granges
and appruamentes of landes within the saide maneris and
also other maneres And was fraudelently deposid the xxiij
yere of his rewle bi the space of v. yeres And then after
restorid to his dignite And so decessid on whos sowle Jhesu
have mercy.
Thomas Sutton the xvijth (sic) Abbot with subtilite and meyn-
tenance usurped v. yeres and so after abiecte was made Prior
of Poughley in Barke Shire. Thes intrusor bykl no thing
but wastid and spended the goodes of the Monastery for his
defense And lette downe tenementes and othir howses throw
his cause also ben withdrawe mony quyte Rentes nevir of
like to be rekevirid without the helpe of a singuler benefac-
toure.
Vol. XIV k
130 Transactions for the Year 18S9-90.
William Hunt the xixth Abbot succedid electe the xxvij day of
September And rewled viiij yeres And decessid the xiiij day
XX
of Marche the yere of oure lord M.cccc.iiij j And is beried in
the Northe side of our ladi chapell in the nethir arche bi the
qwere there.
This wurshipfull fader Abbot William Hunt dyd mony benefites
for his time in bilding of diverse Granges And especially
that he of the new lette make the hoole Rofe of the churche
l)othe the bowke and the lies of the same And new lette cast
the ledde for the same from the Toure all estward with oure
lady chapelle, with othir howses of office and also benelites
for the whiche God rewarde him Amen.
John Newlande the xxli Abbot succedid electe the vj day of
XX
Aprile the yere of our lord M.cccc iiij.i. And ruled honorably
xxxiiij yeres And decessid the ij'1 clay of June the yere off our
lorde M.vcxv And is beried in the South Side off our Lady
chapell in the Arch there by the dore going in to the loft
going to the organs.
This Reverend Father Abbot John Xewland did many honorable
dedis in his tyme in bilding of v. new barnys in the parrish
of Berkeley ij grete barnys att Asshelworth And in repayr-
ing the manor of Almondesbury And in reedifiing the manor
of Ligh, the manor of Horefed, the manor of Codrington, the
manor of Powlet with many other grete Actis in bilding and
repairing of chaunselles othir Howses Also the said Reverend
father In his tyme bildid the dortor And fraytor, the Priores
logginge, the yatehouse, the Amery with the logginges next
adioynant, the hey barne, the Stabilles ioynyng to the malt
howse, with the fundacioun of the body of church to the
soilis of the aWyndos of the north side And the westend
with othir Houses of office And many othir grete benefytes
for the which God reward hym with eternal blisse Amen.
Robert Elyot the xxj Abbot succedid elect the xxviij day of
August the yere of our Lord Mvcxv. and Ruled right honor-
abely.
Sanctuary Knockers,
131
SANCTUARY KNOCKERS.
By MARY ELLEN BAGNALL-OAKELEY.
Upon the doors of a few old churches there still remain large
bronze escutcheons representing the head of a gruesome monster
with locks flowing and jaws extended, and in some cases the head
of a man within them. Through the monster's mouth hangs a
massive ring which in days gone by served as the Hagoday or
Sanctuary Knocker, at which when "offenders dyd come and
knocke, streightwaie they were letten in at any time of the nyght.1
On the south door of St. Nicholas Church, Gloucester, there is
an example of one of these knockers, and the head of the fugitive
is represented enveloped in his hood, with tongue protruding and
breathless with haste, escaping into the Church from between
behind the animal's head. It is a fine specimen of 14th century
bronze work and is in excellent preservation, though the iron
bronze ring is modern. (Fig. 3.)
At St. Nicholas Church, Gloucester. Elg. 3 At Adel Church. Fig. i
1 Rites of Durham, page 35.
Notk. — All mention of the cities of refuge, and of any other Sanctuary
which existed before Christian times, has been purposely omitted from
this Paper.
K 2
132
Transactions for the Year 1SS9-90.
The Knocker is still upon the door of Adel Church, near Leeds,
(fig. 4) and a very similar specimen exists at St. Gregory's,
Norwich, (Jig. 5) but this latter
has been removed from its
original position to a door in-
side the church. There is another
at All Saints', York (fig. 6).
At St. Gregory's Church Norwich. Fig. 5. At All Saints' Church, York. Fig. 6.
All of these have a similar ornamentation of foliage encircling
the escutcheon, and as in the
Adel Knocker the ring
is
original and similarly ornamen-
ted ; all these are 14th century
work.
The earliest example of
a hagoday is the magnificent
specimen on the south door of
Durham Cathedral, which is
said to have been placed there
in the time of Bishop Geoffrey
Ruful, a.d. 1140 (fig. 7), and
this Knocker has an additional
interest attaching to it, as its
At Durham Cathedral. Fig. 7. purpose and use are fully des-
cribed in the Sanctuariam Dunelmense, which will be quoted
later on.
Sanctuary Knockers. 133
The Sanctuaries or Asylums were places to which either the
Church or the Sovereign had given the right of sheltering those
who claimed protection, and from which no one could be forcibly
taken without sacrilege. At first this privilege was not intended
to shelter the wicked from justice, but as a refuge for the innocent
and oppressed, and to give a man an asylum till he could have a
fair hearing. The only people to whom this protection was denied
were apostates and heretics, for they had deserted the Faith which
made the Sanctuary sacred ; but as time went on, murderers and
traitors a sought and obtained shelter within the sacred spots, and
the Sanctuaries of Mediaeval Christendom, which, originally, were
necessary remedies for a barbarous state of society, became when
that state had passed away, almost unmixed evils.
The privilege of Sanctuary in Churches or other sacred places
was recognised from very early times, though there are no laws
relating to it older than those of Theodosius (a.d. 401 to a.d.
450.) It is plain, however, that these laws were not made to
establish any new right, but rather for the regulation of one
which was then in use, and in the life of St. Basil (a.d. 329) it is
recorded that he protected a widow who had taken refuge at the
altar against the Governor of Pontus.
In Roman times other places besides Churches were allowed
this privilege — the statue of the Emperor, his standard in the
camp, and the graves of the dead were all considered sacred, and in
later times the cross by the highway,1 hospitals, and even some
schools were added to the places to which a fugitive might fiy for
safety.
We are told by Geoffrey of Monmouth that in the time of the
Druids asylum was allowed in their sacred groves, and the
rather mythical King Lucius (a.d. 180) is said to have conferred
it upon the Church of Winchester, but it is not till a.d. 633 that
Pope Boniface V. confirmed and authorised Sanctuaries, and he
is generally considered as the founder of Sanctuary, as it after-
wards prevailed so extensively in the West. Soon after this we
1 Si qui ad aliquam crucem in via persequentibus inimicus, confugeret,
liber ac si in ipse ecclesia permaneat.
Concilium Claramont 1093,
Apud Du Fresne torn II, Col. 1184,
13-4 TRANSACTIONS *'OR THK YKAK 1880-90.
find laws were made in England with reference to this privilege,
and about a.d. 690, Ina King of Wessex enacted " that if a person
who had committed a capital offence shall fly to a Church, he
shall preserve his life, and make satisfaction according as right
requires. If any deserving of stripes shall fly to a Church the
punishment shall be forgiven him."
By a law of King Alfred, made a.d. 887, the privilege was for
three days, and it was enacted that " if anyone took a malefactor
from a church, it should be considered Sacrilege, and the offender
was to pay a fine of 120 shillings to the Church. William the
Conqueror altered this law, and made a difference between places
of greater or less sanctity — thus a man who took a person from
an Abbey (Ecclesia Religiones) was to forfeit 100 shillings and
restore the person, if from a parish Church 20 shillings, if from
a Chapel 10 shillings ; and this law states that Sanctuary men
may go 40 paces from the more sacred place, and 30 paces if it be
only parish Church.
In Edgar's Canons, a.d. 959, priests are admonished to suppress
"cultum voluntarium et necromantiam et auguria, et incantationes
et divinum hominis cultum, et plura qute exercentur in variis
prpestigiis, et in cathedra pacis, et in ulmis, et etiam in aliis variis
arboribus et in saxis et in multis aliis phantasmatibus quibus rnulti
eorum qui non deberent dicipiantur.1
The laws of Edward the Confessor made many references to
Sanctuary, and by the 5th Article it is enacted that a malefactor
repeating his injustice, and making a practice of getting into
Sanctuary, must not only make restitution, but must abjure the
country, and renounce the right of Sanctuary in those precincts.2
Quicunqui reus vel noxius et ecclesiam causa praesidii, confugerit
ex quo alrium tenuerit, a nemine insequente nullatenus apprehen-
datum nisi per Pontificem aut ministrum ejus."
William I., in his 4th year, made express laws respecting
Sanctuary. When he founded Battle Abbey, he made it a Sanctuary
even for murderers, and ordained that " if the Abbot came upon
anyone at their place of execution, he should have power to save
1 Edgar Canon, No. 16. - Collier, Vol. I., p. 537.
Sanctuary Knockers. 135
them." From this time the laws of Sanctuary remained in much
the same state till the reign of Henry VIII., when they were
materially altered, and restricted by various acts of parliament,
and ordered that it should not be allowed to those who had
escaped from the hands of the sheriff, and as religious houses had
been dissolved, asylum was now confined to Cathedrals and parish
Churches.
At first the altar and inner buildings of a Church were alone
considered as Sanctuary, but soon these limits were enlarged, and
all the space between the Church and the outer walls, that is
the houses and lodgings of the abbots and the monks, and the
cloisters, were allowed the privilege, and this extension no doubt
arose from the fact that a refugee had to eat and sleep in the
Church itself, which they were expressly forbidden to do.
The space which was considered sacred, varied in different
places, the more sacred the shrine or building, the greater was the
space allowed around it. At Beverley a mile around on every side
was safe; at St. Edmondsbury one mile in the direction of each
cardinal point, terminating with a cross, was the limit. At
Hexham there were four crosses, set up in four ways, leading
to the Church, and between these the malefactor was safe.
The Welsh appear to have had a very largely extended
Sanctuary, and, we are told, " that they allowed all criminals, even
murderers, this privilege, and that they were allowed to take their
servants and cattle with them, for which purpose large tracts of
pasture land were assigned, and were held sacred and inviolable."
Geraldus Cambrensis speaking of this subject in his own days,
A.D. 1146 to 1223, says: l "We observe that they show a greater
respect than other nations to Churches and ecclesiastical persons,
to the relicts of saints, bells, holy books and the cross which
they devoutly revere ; and hence their churches enjoy more than
ordinary tranquility. For peace is not only preserved towards
all animals feeding in churchyards, but at a great distance from
them, where certain boundaries and ditches have been appointed
by the bishops in order to maintain the security of Sanctuary.
1 Bonn's edition ; p. oU7a.
136 Transactions eor the Yeak 1889-90.
But the principal Churches to which antiquity has annexed the
greater reverence, extend their protection to the herds as far as
they can go to feed in the morning and return at night."
In the laws of Hoel Dha, a.d. 928, fighting is forbidden in
churchyards and sanctuaries under heavy fines. For fighting
within the churchyard £14 are to be paid, if out of the church-
yard and in the sanctuary £7 are to be paid. This seems to have
been the cause why fairs were often held in the churchyard or
sanctuary, as at such meetings fights were likely to take place,
and the sacredness of the situation was more likely to restrain the
passions or feelings of revenge.
The ceremonies connected with the taking of sanctuary are
recorded with great minuteness in the Sanctuariam Dunelmense,
where they are thus described — "A man from Wolsingham was
committed to prison for theft, and escaping, sought refuge at the
Cathedral of Durham, having sounded the Knocker on the great
door, he was admitted, and took his stand before St. Cuthbert's
shrine, the Galilee bell then sounded to inform the city that a
man had taken Sanctuary, and that a coroner was required to
hear a confession. John Racket, the Coroner of Chester Ward,
soon arrived to do this duty, and having heard all the culprit had
to say in self-defence, he sentenced him to abjure the realm. The
sacrist, sheriff, under sheriff, and other officers being present, the
man took a solemn oath that he would perform his sentence. He
then stripped himself of his clothing to his shirt, and gave it to
the sacrist as his fee, the clothing was at once restored to him,
and a white cross put into his hand, a black gown, with a yellow
cross (called St. Cuthbert's Cross) on the shoulder was put on him,
and he was handed over to the sheriff, who gave him in charge
of the nearest constable, whose duty it was to pass him on to the
next in the direction of the sea, and so on, till he reached the
shore, where he was put on board a ship, and for ever bade fare-
well to his country."
These ceremonies appear to have varied in different places,
for in some Sanctuaries a man could go alone to the sea if he carried
in his hand a crucifix, and took the most direct route. If he got
Sanctuary Knockers. 137
to the port and failed to find a ship, he had to go every day into
the water up to his knees (it does not say how long he was to stay
there) and this he had to do for 40 days, when no ship arriving,
he must return to his Sanctuary.
It appears that, occasionally, the refugee remained permanently
in his place of asylum, for in a charter of one of the Saxon Kings
to Crowland Abbey granting to it the privilege of Sanctuary, it
expressly declares that criminals who take refuge there shall
become the slaves of the abbot.1
It was ordered in most Sanctuaries that the fugitives should
be guarded by lay keepers, because the expense of feeding,
clothing, and watching them would have been too great a tax
upon the funds of the Church, and as the strictest watch and
ward had to be maintained by night and day, the city authorities
were held responsible for the personal care of the fugitives. There
must have been considerable danger to an unarmed community
when several of these criminals had to be admitted ogether, and
we find, as early as the Laws of Theodosius, before referred to,
a.d. 401 to 450, it is especially provided that all who claimed the
protection of Sanctuary should be unarmed, except with a blunt
knife for their food, and they enacted " that if any refused to
lay aside his arms on entering the Sanctuary, it should be lawful
to senl for a magistrate, and with the consent of the bishop, the
officers might come armed into the Church and take the refugee
by force, and if he chanced to be killed in so doing, it should be
reckoned his own fault."2 This seems to have been almost the
only cause for which an armed force might enter the Sanctuary.
But for these precautions, a number of armed ruffians might
have gained access to any Church or Religious house, and slain
and pillaged its inmates. (If during any man's residence in these
asylums he did damage, even of Id. value, he was according to the
Laws of Hoel Dhato leave at once, and seek another Sanctuary.)
It has been suggested that the rooms over the lofty porches in
some Churches, were used by the men whose duty it was to admit
the fugitive, and that a light was kept burning all night to guide
I Archaologia, Vol. II., p. 313. - Hoel Dha's Law, a.d. 907.
13S Transactions for the Year 1SS9-90.
them to the refuge. At Durham Cathedral two rooms similarly
situated were undoubtedly used for this purpose, and tradition
says that a light was placed behind the Great Knocker, and
shone through the monster's eyes. A very improbable story !
The violation of Sanctuary appears to have been very rare,
and when it did occur was looked upon as flagrant sin. The few
accounts which we have, show what a commotion it caused, and
what serious results arose in consequence. In early Irish History
it is related that a criminal had taken Sanctuary at the Abbey
of St. Ruan, or St. Ruadon, (now the Abbey of Lorha, near
Roscrea). From this place he was taken, and dragged to Tara,
the Abbot demanded his restitution, which King Diarmed
obstinately refused, and finally put the man to death. The enraged
abbot, and a bishop that was with him went in solemn procession
to Tara, and " they took the bells that they had, which they rang
hardly, and cursed the King, and the place, and prayed God that
no King or Queen ever after should or could dwell in Tara, but
that it should be waste for ever." This actually occurred, and the
last assembly of the tribes took place in Tara, about a.d. 562,1 since
which time the scene of festivity and song has been silent and
deserted, and those who have seen the bleak desolation of Tara's
halls, can fully realise the consequence of the Saints' curse. The
name of this monastry commemorated the malediction, as it was
afterwards known as the " Monastery of the Curses of Ireland."
The Sanctuaries of Ireland must have been very numerous, if
we care to judge by the following passage, from the ancient eccle-
siastical Law of Ireland.
Sinoclus dicit : Ubicunque inveneritis signum crucis Cliristi ne
Iceseritis.
Locus sanctus no excedet longitudinem et Jatitudinem atrii
exterioris laberuaidi et templi Salamonis, qua iwleber per c cubitos
manus virilis in loiujitudine quinquaginta cubitus.
Hibernensis Lib. xliv., cap. 31
Wasserachleben H. 2nd Edit. Leipzig, 1685.
1 Bingham, Vol. II., p. 580.
Ancient Laws of Ireland, Rolls Scries, Vol. II., p. 255.
Sanctuary Knockers. 139
The laws go on to state that the Church would be liable for
loss, if she protected fugitives, except under certain conditions as
to time and crime.
In 1378 two English knights named Shackle and Hawle took
Sanctuary at Westminster, and fled to the Choir just at the time
of the celebration of High Mass ; the Deacon was reading the
Gospel of the day, when suddenly the clash of arms was heard, and
the pursuers regarding neither time or place burst in upon the
Service. One of the knights escaped unhurt, but the other named
Hawle was pierced with twelve wounds, and sank dead in front of
the Prior's stall ; he was regarded as a martyr to the injured rights
of the abbey and obtained the unusual honour of being buried within
its walls. The abbey was shut up for four months, and parliament
was suspended lest its assembly should be polluted by sitting
within desecrated precincts, and the whole case was heard by the
King himself. The abbot William of Colchester pronounced the
the excommunication of the two chief assailants and the payment
by them of £200 by way of penance. This tremendous uproar
took place in the early days of Richard II.1
The Sanctuary of Westminster occupied a very prominent
situation, and though few of the actual buildings remain, a part
is still called " the Broad Sanctuary." There are few more ro-
mantic stories in English History than the one which relates how
Elizabeth Woodville Queen of Edward IV. with her three
daughters, her mother and Lady Scrope came and knocked at
the great door of the Sanctuary of Westminster, and having
registered themselves as Sanctuary women took up their abode
within its sacred walls. Soon afterwards the Queen gave birth
to a son, the future King of England ; there was no one to tend
the little Prince but a nurse who happened to be within the
walls, and he was baptised by the sub-prior, with the abbot
as his godfather, and the Duchess of Bedford and Lady Scrope as
his godmothers. A few years passed away and the Queen again
sought the shelter of the abbey ; the little King was not with her,
but hoping to keep her other son the Duke of York, she carried
1 Walsingham's Historia Anglicana, Vol. II. p, 375 et seq.
Master of the Rolls Series,
140 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
him into the Sanctuary. The Lord Protector however had deter-
mined to get possession of the boy, and not daring to violate the
Sanctuary, he held a Council at which it was decided that it might
be a protection for men and women, but could not be so for children,
as they could not commit a crime for which it was required, and
that he might take his nephew from thence if he pleased, this he
accordingly did, but with the Queen's consent.
Sanctuaries continued in full power till the Reformation, but
if we are to believe contemporary accounts they had become most
dangerous refuges for the lawless and disaffected in all classes of
society. Speaking of the terrible state to which the Sanctuary
of Westminster was reduced in the 16th century, the Duke of
Buckingham is said by Sir Thomas Moore to have thus described
it. " There they build, there they spend, and bid their creditors go
whistle for them. Men's wives run thither with their husband's
plate, thieves bring thither their stolen goods and live thereon.
Nightly they steal out, they rob, they reave, and kill, and then
come in again." The right of Sanctuary in fact rendered the
whole precinct a vast cave of Adullum for all the distressed and
discontented of the metropolis who desired, according to the
phrase of the time, to "take Westminster." i When things had
come to such a state as this, it was time for the law to interfere,
and various Acts of Parliament were passed by which the privileges
were lessened, and at last finally suppressed, 21st James I. A
few buildings and precincts in London still gave shelter to debtors,
but this also ceased in 1697 and the only Sanctuary which re-
mained in the Kingdom was the precincts of the Abbey and Palace
of Holyrood, Edinburgh (PI. VIII.) Here until a short time ago a
debtor could still knock at the door and register himself a Sanc-
tuary man, defying his creditors to arrest him. The limit of safety
was a large one and included the whole of the Queen's road round
Ai'thur's seat, and a considerable distance in the other direction.
When Sunday morning came these Sanctuary men could go where
they pleased, and when night came they returned to remain in
safety for another week. At last this became such a public scan-
dal that a law was passed in 1880 to do away with the Sanctuary
of Holyrood, and nothing now remains of the Right which in
mediaeval time exercised such a powerful influence in Christendom.
1 Stanley's Historical Memorials Westminster Abbey, p. 365.
PLATE VIII
THE SANCTUARY HOLYROOD.
"PYrilEXECUMBE." 141
" PYCHENECUMBE."
Abstracts of Original Documents in the Registers of the
Abbey of St. Peter, Gloucester.
Communicated by the Rev. JOHN MELLAND HALL, M.A.
The parish of Standish, in this county, contains two portions
which are completely detached and separated from its centre : these
are Colthrop, consisting of 699 acres, and Pitchcombe of 240 acres
or thereabouts. This latter portion is distant between three and
four miles in a direct line from the parish Church of Standish.
The mode of its annexation has never, so far as we are aware,
been satisfactorily explained.
These lands would appear to have been in the possession of
the Abbey of St. Peter, Gloucester, during the reign of Hen. III.,
if we may conclude that the following charter, which comes under
the head of "Pychenecumbe," has reference thereto : we think it
well to give a translation of this charter in full : —
" This is the agreement made between the lord John [de Felda]
Abbot and the Convent of St. Peter Gloucester and Richard
le Breth of Pichenecombe — viz — that the said Abbot and
Convent have granted and demised in the thirty seventh year
of the reign of King Henry, son of King John (1253) to
Richard of Pichenecumbe and his heirs or assigns, custody of
the land with appurtenances which Henry de Avenebury
formerly held in the Manor of Stanedys viz., in Hersecumbe
— with the marriage of the infant and heir of the said
Henry, without disparagement : to have and to hold the
custody of the said land as long as by the Custom of England,
he ought to be under guardianship : so that they cause no
waste, nor destruction, nor deterioration in the appurtenances
of the same, housebote and heybote excepted. But if anything
after the manner of men should happen to the said heir,
142 Transactions for the Year 1S89-90.
the Abbot and Convent have granted to the said Richard and
his heirs custody of the said lands and appurtenances, with the
marriage of another existing heir: Saving to the same the
service which pertains to the said land, viz. ' Esquieria,' and
suit of Court at Gloucester and at Stanedys, with their other
freemen. For this concession and surrender Richard has "iven
to the said Abbot and Convent Fifty marcs Silver and one
Tierce of Wine. And the said Richard and his heirs shall
observe all these things under a penalty of forfeiting One
hundred shillings. In testimony whereof we have affixed
our seals to this writing."
If we are correct in our conjecture that this grant really
applies to " Pichenecumbe " — although the reference to the " de
Avenbury " family and Harescombe, with which we know from
other sources they were connected, is somewhat perplexing — it
is suggested, however, that by the decease of the said heirs and a
subsequent grant, these lands came absolutely to Richard le Breth :
in which case the fifty-five charters or other writings so carefully
pi'eserved in the Register of Abbot Froucester in the Cathedral
Library (abstracts of which are given below), shew us the process
of their re-acquisition by the abbey, and their connection with
Standish as a portion of the manors appertaining to the Almonry
of that place.
We have here a series of transactions ranging from a.d. 1294,
in the reign of Edward I. to a.d. 1329 — the second year of his
grandson, Edward III. In the first place, Richard le Bret, of
Pychenecumbe, grants to Walter his son and Nicholla his wife
all his tenement there for the sum of sixty marcs, which he has
received of the Lord William Maunsel, father of Nicholla. With
the exception of a few, the other charters relate to the dealings
of Walter le Bret with this estate, and explain the mode of its
gradual absorption (creditable or discreditable) into the hands of
the Abbot and Convent of St. Peter's, Gloucester.
It is remarkable that very few of the names of fields or roads
here given remain to this clay — Piparesfiche, Eselde, Edytedich,
Bitesiche, Godeshallewelle, Blakewelle, Barlichforlong, Ballynes-
brink, Guelde ; among the roads — Portwey, Schiringesweye,
"PYCHENECUMBE." 143
Amphesweye, Micldehveye, are altogether unknown to the oldest
inhabitant ; a tradition of a maple-tree as a land-mark (see No.
345) however lingers.
Among the names of witnesses which occur in the series, we
have those of Sir Roger le Rous,1 Sir John le Rous,2 Thos. de
Gardinis, Sheriff,0 Roger de Tewesdebury, Wm de Abbehale,
Almoners of Standish ; John le Boteler, Hen. de Chevringworth,
Knt., Adam Mustel (or Martel), Knt.,4 Adam the Chaplain,
Wm. de Piddesmore, Rich, de Baloun, Roger de Ravenhulle,
Godfrey de Stonehouse, Wm. de Clifford, Ralph Baron, Roger
de Aldewyke, Robert de Sudley, Henry cle Basyng, John de
Caillewe, William de Broke worth, Henry de Brokeworth,5 Rich,
de Compton, Clerk,6 John de Staunton, &c.
It will be observed that the name of the family principally
concerned in these transactions occurs in various forms, some
doubtless errors on the part of the abbey scribes : thus we have
" Bres," "Breth," "Brut," "Bruht," used almost indiscriminately.
The origin of the name must be looked for in the domicile, for
they appear to have sprung from Brittany, hence known as
Bretons. In "Parliamentary Writs" we have Le Bret — Le
Brut — Le Breton, as surnames derived from the same root, and
often applied as equivalent to each other. The name is still
common, especially in Gloucestershire, though some transposition
of letters has taken place, but the various stages are plain, first —
Bret, then Bryt, lastly Birt. This is evident from the distin-
guishing name given to Weston,7 in the Hundred of Longtree,
1 Sheriff of Gloucester in 1278. Knight of the Shire, 1283. Died 1294.
2 Knight of the Shire- Glouc., 1314-5 ; Hereford, 1330-43.
3 Sheriff of Gloucester in 1298 and 1303
4 Adam Martel held lands at Stowell, 15th Edw. II.
5 Benefactor to Lanthony Priory. — Rife Rev. S. E. Bartleet's "Manor
and Advowson of Brockworth." — Trans., VII., 159.
6 Name occurs as witness to Brockworth Charters. — Trans., VII., 152.
7 See "Glouc. Aid for making Edward the Black Prince a Knight." —
Trans. Bristol & Glouc. Arch. Soc, X., 283.
" De heredilms Radulphi de Wylyngton et Thoma? de Bercle pro tercia
parte unius feodi Militis in Weston' quara heredes Johannis le Bret quon-
dam tenuerunt ibidem . . . marca."
144 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
viz., Weston fiirt, which was held by Richard le Bret before
1275.
Another Richard le Bret occurs as Knight of the Shire
(Hereford) in 1290 : in 1297 as holding lands in that county to
the amount of £20 yearly : and in 1301 summoned for military
service against the Scots.
TABLE OF DESCENT.
Richard le Bret,=j=Eva
" de Pychchecumbe."
"I
Walter le Bret=j=Nicholla, daur. of Sir William
Maunsel, of Lypiatt Manor. 1
John de Caillewe,
— I " nephew of Walter
Thomas " cle Holecombe "=Alice. Juliana, le Bret." living 1329.
or " le Bret "
(dead in 1311, v. No, 368)
These charters also furnish an interesting example of the
origin of the surname " Benet," namely from " Benedict," com-
pare No. 358-60 with No. 361.
"PYCHENECUMBE."
Carta Piici le Bres de Vijclienecumhe. 335, fol. 141.
Rich, le Bres (Bret), of Pychenecumbe, grants to Walter his son,
and Nicholla his wife, all the tenement which he has in
Pychenecumbe with its appurtenances, for 60 marcs, which he
has received of the lord William Maunsel, father of Nicholla,
as her marriage portion, for ever, rendering due service to
him and his heirs and one rose yearly at the Feast of the
Nativity of St. John the Baptist. Witnesses : Thomas de
Rodeberwe, John Achord and others.
1 Cf. Inq. p. m. 18th Edw. II. No. William Maunsell, Lupeyate
Maner' Extent' Byssleye un' Vivarium, 6 acr' terr' 3 acr' bosci'.
Rudge states (Vol. I., p. 327) that Upper Lypatt was held of the Honour
of Hereford, and anciently by the Maunsells until 19th Richard II., then for
several generations by the family of Wye, whom Leland mentions as residing
there : afterwards, James I., held by the Throgmortons.
"Pychenecombe." 145
Cheirograph'. Walt le Bret. 336, fol.
Walter le Bret, son of Rich, le Bret, of Pychenecumbe, with the
consent of Nicholla his wife, grants to Robt. le Knyte, Agnes
his wife, and John and Walter their sons, Two Messuages
and Two Curtilages, with one garden and its appurtenances
in Pychenecumbe, of which Eva le Bret held in dower One
Messuage and One Curtilage, which John Segrim1 had, and
Two acres of arable land in the same ville with appurten-
ances, of which one acre extends from the land of John Dru
as far as the said Garden, one Acre lies below Ballvynes-
brynk, and the other in Barlichforlange, adjoining the land
of Matilda Baunse. To be held at an annual rent of Six-
pence at the Feast of the Nativity of St. John the Baptist ;
for which Robert and Agnes have given him twenty-five
shillings.
In testimony of which to the present writing in two portions,
we have affixed our seals. Witnesses: Roger de Ai ,
W1U de Redin, John de Rodeberwe and others.
Carta Walt, de Bret ad Wm. Ythenard. 337, fol.
Walter le Bret, of Pychenecumbe, grants to William Ythenard
and Emma his wife, all his croft adjoining that of Matilda
ate Henefeld for half a mark of silver which they have paid
to him. This croft, with all appurtenances they may give,
devise, sell, or assign at their will, rendering to him and
his heirs Two shillings yearly ; and vjB iva at the Feast of
Saint Andrew ; vj8 ivd at the Feast of the Annunciation :
yjs ivd at the Feast of Saint John the Baptist, for all services.
The said William and Emma to have their plough cattle with
twenty sheep, in the common pasture.
Witnesses : Sir Roger le Rus, Knight,- Henry Ythenard,
and others.
1 " Segrim," an old Saxon name, still survives as a designation of houses
in the adjoining Parish of Painswick. John and Alice Segrym paid subsidy
there in 1327 (1st Edw. III.)
- The date of this cannot be later than 1294 (22nd Edward I.), in which
year Sir Roger le Rous, lord of Harescombe, died,
Vol. XIV. l
146 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
338.
Walter le Bret of Pychenecumbe grants to William de Baloun, for
twenty shillings silver, Two shillings of annual rent issuing
from a certain tenement which William Ythenard and Emma
his wife hold of him for the term of their life.
Witnesses : Adam Spylemon, Stephen Massyndon and others.
339.
Walter le Bret gives to John de Yaneworth for his services all
his wood which lies between the road which leads to Wayn-
swey on the north and Stoneywey on the south, and which
extends to Middlewey on the east, and the way which is
called Portwey on the west ; to hold to the said John during
life, to cut as he will, to sell or give, without waste, rendering
One Rose at the Feast of the Nativity of St. John the
Baptist, for all services and secular demands.
Witnesses : Simon de Fromylode, Roger de Ravenhulle, and
others. Given at Pychenecumbe on the Feast of St. Clement
the Martyr, in the 25th year of King Edward, son of Henry
King of England [1297].
340.
Walter le Bret grants to William de Balon (de Baloniis), for
twenty five marcs, all that his land lying between Culture-
hulle and Godschalneswelle in breadth, with the pasture, and
Edytedich, and the Pasture which is called Oxeleswe with
appurtenances ; and the whole land lying between Pypares-
croft and the said pasture in length, and Holdesichwere and
Maynardesendyng in breadth, and all that toft between
Catweye and Schynngeswey, and between Portwey, ....
and Four Groves, which are called Odgrove.
Witnesses : John de Gloucester, Adam Spylemon, and others.
Given at Pychenecumbe, on the morrow of Saint Laurence
the Martyr, in the 29th year of King Edward, son of King
Henry (1301).
1 ' Pychenecumbe. " 1 47
341.
Walter le Bret grants to William de Baloun, for one hundred
shillings, which he has received of him, One Messuage with
curtilage and appurtenances, and all the land which Thomas
de Holecumbe his son formerly held in Pychenecumbe, to
have and to hold of the chief lords of that fee by due service
and in manner accustomed (Sealed).
Witnesses : Adam the Chaplain, Stephen de Masynton de
Pychenecumbe, Tuesday next after the Feast of Easter, 20th
Edw. I. (1302).
342.
Walter le Bret grants to William de Baloun, his heirs and assigns
for ever, all that pasture called Combe lying between le
Wingforlong and Godeshallewelle with the pasture called
Oxeleswe, for which concession he has received One hundred
shillings.
Witnesses : Adam Spilemon, Thomas de Rodeberwe, &c,
Pychenecumbe, Thursday next before the Feast of St. John
the Baptist (1302).
343.
Walter le Bret de Pychenecumbe gives to William de Baloun,
for Twelve pounds sterling all his land lying in Piparescrofte,
and between his Garden and a certain place called Fiswere,
and all his land in the field called Combe between Colishulle
and Taylesoline in breadth and between and Bitesiche
in length, with hedges and appurtenances.
Witnesses : Will, de Piddesmore, Nich. de Seymour, <fcc ,
Pychenecumbe, Monday next before the Feast of the An-
nunciation of B.V.M., 30 Edw. I. (1302).
344.
William de Baloun " de Algriniton " l has remitted and quit-
claimed to Gilbert de Masynton, for one hundred shillings
Silver, all his right in his lands and tenements in Pychene-
cumbe with all appurtenances, and Two shillings of annual
rent issuing from the tenement which William Ythenard and
Emma his wife hold in Pychenecumbe for the term of their
lives, with the reversion of the same.
1 Algriniton, now Alkerton, in the parish of Eastington.
148 Transactions kor the Year 1S89-90.
Witnesses : Stephen de Masynton, Rich, de Baloun, &c.
Dated Gloucester, on Tuesday the morrow of the Feast of
St. John "ante Portam Latinam " in 31st year of King
Edward, son of King Henry (1303).
345.
Walter le Bret gives to John " dicto de Stanedis," for Twenty
marcs Silver, all his Toft lying between Stonewey and the
stream called Pychenescombesbroc, and between Middleweye
and the land of Hamon " atte Guelde," with all the pasture
adjacent, and appurtenances : also, the arable land stretching
from Pychenescombeshevede to Pychenescombesyate between
the said toft and the brook, with all that pasture called the
Moor, and all that land extending to the said stream and
lying between Longeleys, Nether End, and a certain tree
called " La Mapele,"1 in the field called Pichenecombesfeld
and "culturam meam," with all appurtenances in the field
called Brintesbarlichsforlong.
Witnesses : Roger de Ravenhulle, Steph de Masynton, God-
frey de Stonehouse, &c.
Given at Pychenecumbe in the Octave of St. Mathew the
Apostle, 25th year Edw. I. (1297).
34G.
Walter le Bret confirms to John de Stanedis, Clerk, for Twelve
pounds Silver all his land lying in the field called Geuelde
with a meadow adjacent, and a Grove called Medesweyne,
with all appurtenances.
Given at Pychenecumbe on the Morrow of the Beheading of
St. John Baptist in the 25th year of King Edward the son
of King Henry (1297).
347.
Walter de Bret gives to John called " de Stanedis " Clerk,
for Ten marcs Silver, all his land lying between Pychenes-
combeshevede and Pychenescombesyate in length, and the
1 Subsidy Roll, 1327, "John atte Mapele" vjd, Minchinhampton. Also
iu Hants, " Mapuldur-ham " = the ham at the Maple Tree. —Trans. Bristol
and Glouc. Arch. Soc, Vol. VIII., p. 50.
"pYCHEKEtJMBE." 149
stream called Pychenescombesbroc in breadth, -with portions
extending above the said stream and with the Moors, pasture,
itc., and all his Toft between Portwey, Middelweye in length,
and the way called Waynwey and the way leading to Pagen-
hulle in breadth for ever, rendering thence the capital rent
to the lords of fee with all services and secular demands.
Witnesses : Stephen de Masynton, Henr.Ydenard and others.
348
Walter le Bret grants to John de Stanedis, for £10 Silver paid to
him, all his land lying in the field of Pychenecombe between
the messuage of John atte Guelde and the place called
Stourokul.
Witnesses: Roger de Ravenhulle, Godfrey de Stonehouse, &c.
349.
The same gives to John called "de Stanedis" Cleric, for one
hundred shillings Silver, " cameram meam ultra portam
meam orientalem et stabulum meum juxta p'dictam portam,"
also two granges in the Court, all his pasture between
the gate aforesaid and Taylesthine in length and the said
Granges and the way called Ampheysweye in width with a
garden in the same pasture, also free pasture with all his
cattle in the field called Combe and in Oxeleswe, and in the
Toft wherever his plough cattle may happen to be, with free
ingress and egress as regards all pastures, stable, granges,
court, &c.
Witness : Adam Spylemon, Roger de Ravenhulle, Steph. de
Masynton and others. (No date.)
350.
The same quitclaims to. John de Stanedis all his right in land
lying near Pitchcoinbes' Head and Pitcheombes' Gate, and
between the Toft and Brook ; and the Toft between Portwey,
Middleweye, Waynweye, and the toft of Pagenhulle, with all
appurtenances.
Witnesses : Steph. de Masynton, Henry Ythcnarcl.
Given at Stanedis, Feast of St, Andrew, 30 Edw, 1. (1302),
150 Transactions for the Year 1SS9-90.
351.
The same grants to John cle Stanedis for One hundred shillings
silver all his wood between Schiringesweye and Maynardes
Grove in breadth and between La Romidegne and a certain
place called Leodo in length, and also all his wood between
Catweye and Tayleseline in breadth, and the Stonewey and
field called Combe.
Witnesses : Stephen de Masynton, Will de Pyddesmore, &c,
Pychenecumbe, Wednesday next before Feast of SS. Peter
and Paul, 30 Edw. I. (1302).
353.
Walter le Bret gives to John de Stanedis for one hundred shil-
lings silver all his wood between Massieshale and the Well
called Godeshalneswelle, and the way called Portwey, and a
certain place called Otegrove in breadth, extending in length
from the said Well as far as a certain way called Schirenges-
weye and the said Wood.
Witnesses : Roger de Ravenhulle, Godfrey de Stonehouse, &c.
354.
Walter le Bret de Pychenecumbe grants to John called 'de Stane-
dis,' clerk, for £10 Silver all his land lying between Godeshal-
neswelle and Blakewell in breadth, and between Editedich and
Oxeleswe in length with and all appurtenances : And
all his land lying between Piparescrofte and the aforesaid
pasture in length and Okie fischwere and Maynardestudyns in
breadth, and also all the wood between Catweye and Schiring-
esweye in length, and Portwey and the field called Combe in
breadth with all appurtenances, And Four Groves called Od-
groves.
Witnesses : Adam Spilemon, Roger de Ravenhulle and others.
355.
Walter le Bret gives to same for £10 Silver his land lying in the
field called Combe between and Blakewelle in
breadth, and Barlichforlong and Okie Fischeswere, in length,
with pasture and all appurtenances : And, all his Arable land
" Pychenecumbe." 151
lying between Oxeleswe pasture and Waynweye near Godes-
halneswelle, and all his wood between Catweye and Taylesoline.
Witnesses : Roger de Ravenhulle, Stephen de Masynton.
355 (ii.)
Walter le Bret de Pychenecombe remits and quitclaims for self
and heirs all right in lands and tenements with appurtenances
in Pychenecumbe in which John de Stanedis by divers char-
ters has been enfeoffed.
Witnesses : Will, de Clifford, Stephen de Masynton and others.
Pychenecumbe, Friday next before the Feast of Easter, 33
Edw. I. (1305.)
356.
John de Stanedis remits and quitclaims to Gilbert de Masynton
all the right which he had in all lands and tenements with
woods meadows pastures and appurtenances in Pychenecumbe
by the grant of Walter le Bret by means of various conditional
writings.
Witnesses : Adam Spilemon, Stephen de Masynton and others.
Dated on the Lord's Day in the Octave of the Holy Trinity,
31 Edw. son of King Henry (1303).
357.
John de Stanedis cleric remits and quitclaims to the lord John
Abbot and the Convent of St. Peter, Gloucester, and their
successors, all his right in lands tenements &c. in Pychene-
cumbe.
Witnesses : Adam Spilemon, Stephen de Masynton. Dated
on the Morrow of the Feast of the Apostles Peter and Paul,
31 Edw. 1. (1303.)
358.
Walter le Brut (sic) and Nicholla his wife grant to Benedict
de Holtleye and his heirs for £3 of lawful money Six acres of
land with appurtenances, viz. three acres lying " in the field
called Pychenecumbe " and three acres called Guelde. To hold
of the said Walter and his heirs, rendering to the said Walter
and Nicholla and their heirs, One Rose at the Feast of the
Nativity of St. John Baptist, and that rose at the house of the
said Benedict.
152 Transactions for thj; Year 1889-90.
Witnesses : Henry Ythenard, Will Will, de Pyddes-
more and others.
359.
Walter de Brut and Nicholla his wife grant to Benedict de Holt-
leye and his heirs, for Four Marcs of lawful money paid to
them, Four Acres in Pychenecumbe Field near Gueldesacre
extending to Pychenecumbe Broc, and Two Acres and a half
in the Field called Gueld with all appurtenances between the
Mill and Onesdescrofte, rendering One Rose (as above.)
Witnesses: Ythenard (sic) Will. Hind, Will, de 8a e,
and others.
360.
Agreement made between Walter le Bret and Nicholla his wife
of the first part, and Benedict de Holtleye of the second
part : Walter and Nicholla confirm to Benedict for Eight
mai*cs of lawful money Ten acres Arable mentioned in
Charter and Feoffment formerly given for Sixty shillings
[No. 358], and for Four Acres, four marcs, and Ten acres
Eight marcs and a half, tfcc. , &c.
Witnesses : Henry Ythenard, William Hind, and others.
361.
William Benet son and heir of Benedict de Holtleye remits and
quitclaims to Gilbert Masynton and his heirs all his right
in lands &c. in Pychenecumbe.
Witnesses : Adam Spileman, Steph. de Masynton, etc.
Dated Feast of St. Barnabas Apostle 31 Edw. 1. (1303).
362.
The same remits and quitclaims to the Abbot and Convent of
Gloucester and their successors, his right in lands and tene-
ments in Pychenecumbe.
Witnesses : Adam Spilemon, Steph. de Masynton and many
others. In Octave of St. Barnabas Ap. 31 Edw. I.
363.
Juliana, daughter of Walter le Bret, of Pychenecumbe, remits
and quitclaims to John [Carnage] Abbot of the Convent of
" PvCHENECOMBE." 153
St. Peter of Gloucester &c. for one hundred shillings silver
paid to her, all her right ifcc. in lands and tenements which
the said Walter her father had in villd de Ptjchenecumbe.
(Seals).
Witnesses : Adam Spilemon, Ralph Baron, Roger de Raven-
hulle and others.
364.
Juliana daughter of Walter " called le Bret de Pychenecumbc "
quitclaims to John the Abbot and the Convent &c. for one
hundred shillings Silver all her right in lands which her
father had in Pychenecunibe.
Witnesses : Thomas de Rodberwe, Roger de Aldewykc.
Standish, the Lord's Day in the Vigil of the Epiphany of Our
Lord, A0 Edw. 32 (1304).
365.
Walter le Bret gives to Thomas de Holcombe his son for his
service, and for Five marcs, a Messuage with Curtilage which
Robt Hynder formerly held of his ancestors in Pychenecumbc.
Has given to the said Thomas all his land in Bishopesendyng
extending from " la prestres acre " [Query, the Priest's acre] l
to the curtilage ; and Two acres Arable lying outside Pipares-
fiche, and Two acres and a half, one of which lies in Esclcle
under Balldynesbrynk, and the other at Pychenecumbc
under Braddegrove and is called Shiplondheved.
Witnesses : John le Rous, Adam Spilemon and others.
366.
Thomas le Bret quitclaims to John called " de Stanedis " cleric,
for Sixty shillings silver sterling, all the right that he has in
a messuage of the gift of his father, and in land " in the field
of Byshopesendyng," Pychenecumbe's felde and Efelde &c.
Witnesses : Steph. de Masynton, Wm. de Pyddesmore.
1 Probably a portion of the ancient Glebe belonging to the Church of
Pitchcombe, lying near the field called Lower Witcombe, behind the Great
House ; and lately exchanged for other land (1878).
154 Transactions for the Year 18S9-90.
367.
Thomas le Bret son of Walter le Bret grants to John de Stanedis,
for Sixty shillings sterling, one messuage &c. and lands as
above (" Gefelde " for " Efelde.")
Witnesses : Walter le Bret, Steph. de Masynton, Will, de
Pyddesmore and others.
368.
Alicia " who was the wife of Thos. le Bret " in pure and lawful
widowhood and power remits and quitclaims to John [Thoky]
by Divine Permission, Abbot of St. Peter's Gloucester and
the Convent of the same and their successors for Twenty
shillings Silver, all her right, by reason of dower, in lands in
Pychenecumbe formerly appertaining to Thomas le Bret her
husband.
Witnesses : Will, de Clifford, Steph. de Masynton and others.
Given at Standish on the Saturday next before the Feast of
the Conversion of St. Paul, in the fourth year of Edward, son
of King Edward [1311],
369.
John de Caillewe quitclaims to " the religious men " and the
Convent of St Peter Gloucester his right in all those lands
and tenements which Walter le Bret his uncle formerly held
in Pychenecumbe, — Messuages, Gardens, lands arable, pas-
tures, meadows, <kc.
Witnesses : Will, de Brokeworth, Henry de Brokeworth and
others.
Stanedis, Monday next after the Feast of St. Dionysius the
Martyr, 2 Edw. III. (1329).
370.
William le Brut (sic) acknowledges himself indebted to John of
Yaneworth, Cleric, by a letter of obligation given the 23rd
year of King Edward soil of King Henry, for Fifteen pounds
Silver to be paid at a certain term to the said John, as
Attorney for the Church of Stanedis : rendering at the Feast
of St. Martin, Two quarters Wheat, Four quarters Beans,
Four quarters Barley, Two quarters Oats ; and at the Feast
" PiCHENECOMBE." 155
of St. Michael, Six oxen of the value of 40s. or 40s. — and at
the Feast of the Annunciation B.M.V. Six oxen of the
value of 60s., or 60s., &c, &c.
371.
Walter le Bret is indebted to John Stanedis in the sum of £10
sterling, as appears by the acknowledgment of the said Walter
made at Bristol before the judges of the Lord the King in
24 Edward I. To be paid by instalments : viz., 40s. at the
Manor of Stanedis at the Feast of the Annunciation, 40s. at
Feast of the Nativity of St. John &c.
372.
Octave of St, Matthew the Apostle 25 Edw. I. Walter le Bret
acknowledges £20 received from John de Stanedis on security
of lands, woods, &c. £10 to be repaid on Feast of St. Michael,
and the balance within a fortnight after the said Feast.
Dated at Pychenecumbe, the eve of the Nativity of B.M.V.
373.
Walter le Brut has granted to John de Stanedis for £10 certain
lands in Colnurhulle and Godeshalneswelle (in margin,
Oxeleswe and Piparesfiche).
Pychenecumbe, Tuesday, Vigil of Purification, 27 Edw. I.
T1297].
374.
Walter le Brut having granted to John de Stanedis lands lying
between Colnurhulle and Blakewelle in Pychenecumbe Field
with pastures <kc. and Arable land between the pasture called
Oxeleswe and Waynway near Godeshalneswelle and also
woods between Catweye and Taylesclyve ; John de Stanedis
of his special grace concedes that if said Walter on the Day
of the Assumption of B.M.V. or next after completion
of these presents, pay to him or his heirs in the Cemetery of
St. Nicholas of Standish, Twelve marcs sterling, all the
said tenements shall remain to the use of the said Walter &c.
Pychenecumbe, Monday next before the Feast of St. George.
28 Edw. [1300].
156 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
375.
William de Baloun " de Algerinthon " quitclaims to the Abbot <kc.
all right in lands tenements &c. formerly held by him in the
said Ville.
Witnesses : Adam Spilemon, Steph. de Masynton. Octave
of SS. Peter and Paul Ap. 31 Edw. I. [1303].
376.
Walter le Bret appoints John called 'de Stanedis' his attorney to
give seisin of all lands ifcc. which he formerly held in Pychene-
cumbe to Gilbert de Masynton. Gloucester, Feast of St.
31 Edw.
377.
Same grants to Gilbert de Masynton for £50 silver all his land
lying in the Field called Combe and between Combesbrok and
Maynardesendyng and Byshopesrudyng, and Wood between
Schiringesweye and Catweye in length and Pomvey and
"Combe" in breadth; four groves called Odgroves, and
Oxeleswe pasture, with appurtenances ; Also a messuage
with curtilage, and all the land which Thomas his son
formerly held, and two shillings of rent issuing from the
tenement which Wm. Ythenard and Emma his wife held for
the term of their life, with reversion of same.
Witnesses : Adam Spilemon, Thomas de Rodeberwe and
others. Pychenecumbe, Friday, the morrow of the Feast of
St. Luke the Evangelist 30 Edw. I.
378.
Walter le Bret grants to Gilbert de Masynton for 100s. silver all
his lands and tenements in Pychenecumbe with all appur-
tances saving his Manse (Manor House) and his garden.
Witnesses : Wm. de Clifford, Steph. de Masynton. Pychene-
cumbe, Wednesday next befurc the Feast of St. George the
Martyr 31 Edw. 1.
379.
The same quitclaims to same all lands &c.
Witnesses : Wm. de Clifford, Steph. de Masynton. Pychene-
cumbe Friday next before the Feast of Easter 31 Edw. 1.
"Pychenecumbe." 157
380.
Walter le Bret grants to Gilbert cle Masynton his messuage and
garden in Pychenecumbe and all other tenements which
remained to him in the same ville at the completion of these
presents.
Witnesses : Adam Spilemon, Steph. de Masynton.
Dated Monday the morrow after the Feast of the Holy
Trinity.
381.
Agreement by John, Abbot of St. Peter's, Gloucester, for one
marc silvei', to be paid at Feasts of the Annunciation and
St. Michael, in commutation of services due in connexion
with Tenement at Pychenecumbe which Richard le Bret and
his ancestors held of the said Monastery : Esquieriam nomine
serjancii, viz., cum aliqids monachns cccVie n're j)ro negotiis...
cum uno runcino, &C."1
Witnesses : Sir Henry de Cheveringworth, Adam Mastel,
Knights, Rich, de Oompton, Clerk, and many others.
382.
John cle Elbeston, on the Feast of St. Luke Evang. 16 Edw. II.
in the presence of Abbot John, John de Staunton, John de
Boteler, Wm. de Brocworth. Hen. de Basyng, John de Stan-
dish and others, received from Sir William cle Abbehale,
Almoner of St. Peter's, Four Charters and two quitclaims of
the muniments of Pychenecumbe, with the Charter of the
lord the King concerning the said Tenements. Gloucester.
383.
King's Writ addressed to Sheriff of Gloucestershire to make
Inquisition if it would be to the injury of the King to grant
permission to Gilbert cle Masynton to assign a Messuage and
Carucate of land with appurtenances in Pychenecumbe to
the Abbot and Convent of St. Peter's, Gloucester. 31 Edw.
(1304].
1 When lands were held by this service, the tenant was required to find
a squire and horse to follow any monk dispatched on the business of the
monastery on his journey, to serve him and to carry upon his own horse the
furniture of the monk's bed, also a book, cresset, candles, two loaves, and
half a sextary of wine^or beer.— Hist, et Cart. Mon. St. Peter, Gloitc., Vol. III.
p. civ.
158 TRANSACTIONS FOR THE YEAR 1888-9.
384.
Inquisition taken at Gloucester on the Sunday next before the
Feast of St. Valentine 31 Edw., before Thomas de Gardinis,
Sheriff of Gloucester, Robert Mort de freyt, Robert de Suclley
and others, who say that it would not be to the King's
prejudice to permit Gilbert de Masynton to assign the said
Messuage and Carucate to the said Abbot and Convent : that
the messuage is held of the abbot by a rent of 17s. 4d.
and suit at the Court every three weeks : that there remain
to the said Gilbert (besides this assignment) lands and tene-
ments to do custom and service and to meet other charges,
as in suits, vigils, views, views of frankpledge, talliages, fines,
redemptions, amerciaments and whatsoever other charges had
to be sustained : and that the said Gilbert may be put on
assize and juries, as before he has been put and that the land
shall not be aggrieved more than has been usual.
Another inquisition taken at Gloucester on Sunday Nov 25,
Feast of St. Katharine, finds that Walter le Bret holds in
the ville of Pychenecumbe a Carucate of land of the Abbot —
a Messuage with garden, worth yearly xiid ; in demesne 80
acres arable, each acre worth four pence by the year, sum
26s 8d ; a certain pasture in severalty, xijd : eight acres
Wood, iijd, sum 2s : Total of Extent, xxxs viijd. For which
the said Walter renders xvijs iijd to the Abbot : and that it
will not be to the prejudice of the lord the King to permit
Walter le Bret to give and assign the said lands and tene-
ments to the Abbot and his successors.
385.
License of King Edward for Grant of Messuage and Carucate to
Abbot and Convent. Mch. 18 31 Edw. I.
In the same year " Originalia Roll" states that the Abbot
of St Peter's Gloucester made a fine with the King in a
hundred shillings for permission to enter on a lay tenement
in Pychenecumbe.
" Pychenecumbe." 159
386.
Gilbert de Masynton grants to the Church of St Peter Gloucester,
and to the monks there serving God, in pure and perpetual
Alms for the augmentation of the Almery of " Stanedis," One
Messuage and one Carucate of land, with meadows, woods,
grazings, pastures, ways, paths, fisheries, and all other appur-
tenances, which he has in Pychenecumbe, Also One Messuage
with Curtilage, and all land and appurtenances which Thomas
son of Walter le Bruht formerly held in Pychenecumbe and
Two shillings and sixpence, rent issuing out of the tenements
of Will. Ythenard and Robt le Knyght in the same ville,
with the reversion of the same.
Witnesses : Wm. de Clifford, Adam Spilmon, Steph. de
Masynton and others.
Given on the Day of the Nativity of St. John Baptist 31
Edward, son of King Henry [1303].
387.
The Same for self and heirs quitclaims to Abbot &c. all right
which he has in any way in lands etc. in Pychenecumbe.
Witnesses : Wm. de Clifford, Steph. de Masynton.
Octave of S. J. Baptist 31 Edw. I. [1301].
388.
Gilbert de Masynton has given to God and the Church of St.
Peter, Gloucester and the monks there serving God, for the
augmentation of the Almonry of Standish, a Messuage and
Carucate ; and a Messuage with Curtilage, late of Thomas le
Bret son of Walter — and 2s. 6d. rent &c. as before ; Also
Ten acres land which William Benet son of Benedict de
Holtleye formerley held in the said Ville.
Witnesses : Will, de Clifford, Adam Spilmon, Steph. de
Masynton.
389.
John [de Gamage] Abbot of St Peter's Gloucester appoints Philip
de Longford, Cleric, his Attorney, to receive seisin of land
160 Transactions for the Year 18S9-90.
and tenements which Gilbert de Masynton has given to the
Abbey in pure and perpetual Alms in Pychenecumbe.
Dated Gloucester, Thursday next before Feast of St. Bar-
nabas the Apostle A0 31 Edw.
390.
Walter le Bruht (sic) quitclaims to Abbot and Convent of Glou-
cester and successors, in Augmentation of the Almonry of
"Stanedis," all the right he had in the ville of Pychene-
cumbe in One Messuage, One Carucate of land, one hundred
acres Wood, with appurtenances ; for which quitclaim &c.
the Abbot and Convent have given him £40 silver.
Witnesses : Will, de Gardinis, Adam Spilmon, Ralph Baron.
Dated on the day of the Apostles Peter and Paul, 31 Edw.
[1303].
391.
" Scriptum Walteri le Brut ad Abbatem."
[translation in full.]
" I, Walter called le Bruht of Pychenecumbe have received of
John [de Gamage] Abbot of Saint Peter Gloucester and
the Convent of the same place, by the hands of brother Roger
de Tewesdebuiy, Almoner of Standish, Twenty seven marcs
Silver for all contracts remissions etc. made to the said Abbot
and to Gilbert de Masynton concerning lands and tenements
at Pychenecumbe : I have also received from the said Abbot,
through brother Roger, Fifty shillings Silver for wrought
stone sold to the said Abbot & Convent at Pychenecumbe,
and for all moveables found there on Saturday in the Vigil
of the Holy Trinity, Anno Edw. 31. [1303].
Witnesses, Roger de Aldewyke, Adam Spilmon, Win de
Clifford it others.
Dated at Payneswyk, on the Lord's Day next after the Feast
of St Valerian the Martyr.
" Finis Cartarum de Pychenecumbe."
(Registrum B.
Froucest' Abbti8)
"Pychbnecdmbe." 161
As to the subsequent history of these lands we have but little
information. However, in the Register of Abbot Braunch, 16th
Henry VII. (1501) 4th January,1 we find a lease of the Abbey's
Manor de la Pychenecumbe, " with all buildings, lands, meadows,
pastures, and part of the Demesne, together with Tythes and all
and singular the rights thereto appertaining, (lately -held by
Richard Gardyner) granted to William Gardiner senior, William
Gardiner his son, Agnes his Avife, and John Gardyner brother of
William Gardyner senior, for the term of Seventy years or so
long as all or any one of them shall live, — rendering thence to the
Abbot and Convent by the hands of the Almoner for the time
being, 64s. 4d. per annum, at the four feasts : of the Annunciation
of the B.V. M. ; Nativity of St. John Baptist ; St. Michael ; and
the Nativity of our Lord, in equal portions : with suit of Court at
Standyshe, and payment to the lord of Payneswik of all due and
accustomed rents : housebote and heybote at the discretion of the
woodward : Heriot, the best beast or one marc silver, at the option
of the Almoner."
In Abbot Parker's Register, Vol. II.,2 we also find grants of
the Reversion of the site of the Manor of Pychenecumbe, viz :
to Robert Wye, in 152f> and to Richard Gardiner, in 1531, the
manor at that date being in the tenure of William Gardiner father
of the said Richard.
Some of these lands, being parcel of the possessions of the late
Monastery of St. Peter, Gloucester, and lately in the tenure of
William Gardiner and others, were granted by Letters Patent,
dated 15th July, 35th Henry VIII. (1544) to Richard Andrews
and Nicholas Temple, their heirs and assigns, and the heirs of the
said Richard Andrews for ever, rendering at the Feast of St.
Michael the Archangel viijd. Also " the scite and Capital Mes-
suage of the Manor of Pichenecumbe, lately in the hands of the
Monastery of St. Peter, and in the tenure of William Gardiner
senior, Johanna his wife, and William and John Gardiner sons of
the said William," with Pychenecombe Wood, containing by
estimation 47 acres, and certain Tythes — to be held in capite by
the service of the 20th part of one knight's fee, rendering yearly
at the Feast of St. Michael, 6s. 5|d.
1 Keg. Braunch, fol. 5 - No. 86.
Vol. XIV. it
162 Transactions for the Year 1SS9-90.
By the Standish Tythe Apportionment dated Nov. 21st, 1839,
John Page, gent., is named as the Impi-opriator of the Tithes of
Corn, Grain and Hay, which are thereby commuted at £54 10s.;
but an amended award in 1844 declares that "it has been repre-
sented to the Tithe Commissioners that John Page is erroneously
stated in the Original Award to be Impropriator of Tithe of Corn,
Grain and Hay accruing upon all lands in the third Schedule
(Oxlinch Tything) whereas in fact, 69 acs. and 3 perches situate in
the Manor of Pitchcombe, and well known by metes and bounds,
are by prescription and other lawful means, exempt from the render
of all tythes; and, as to the remaining 157 acs. 3 r. 37 p. John
Page is Impropriator not only of tythe of corn, grain, and hay,
but of all tythes whatsoever. Of this, 88 acres or thereabouts,
consisted of woodland ; and the whole tythe was commuted at
:gl3 6s. 6d.
Skeletons were discovered a few years ago in the neighbour-
hood of " the Manor Farm House ; " and an old fishpond, paved
with stone, perhaps " Okie Fischwere," (see No. 354) was filled
up previously to 1874. The inhabitants of this portion of Standish
have for many centuries been dependent upon Pitchcombe for
their religious privileges, by reason of distance from their own
parish church.
Under the " Divided Parishes Act," these lands have become
part of the civil parish of Pitchcombe; though in an ecclesiastical
point of view, they nominally remain subject to the jurisdiction
of the vicar of Standish.
It is a remarkable fact, and one which, so far, we are not able
to explain — that whilst the Rectory of Standish, with the great
tythe, formed a portion of the endowment of the new Bishopric
of Gloucester, the tythes from certain lands situated at Pitch-
combe, and apparently as much in the possession of the Monastery
of St. Peter, did not pass with the grant of the rest, but became
an Impropriation, and thus lost of the church.
In concluding these notes, we tender our thanks to the Very
Rev. the Dean of Gloucester for the opportunity of making these
Extracts from the Abbey Registers preserved in the Library.
HARRY MENGDEN SCARTH.
The Science of Arclueology and also the Church of which he was a greatly
respected minister, have sustained a severe loss in the recent death of the
Rev. Harry Mf.xgden Scarth, M.A., Rector of Wrington, Prebendary of
Wells, and Rural Dean of Portishead, in the County of Somerset. Mr.
Scarth was the son of Mr. Thomas Ereshfield Scarth, of Staindrop, co.
Durham. He was born in 1814, and educated at the Edinburgh Academy,
whence he passed to Christ's College, Cambridge, and took his B. A. degree in
1837 and M.A. in 1840. In the same year he was ordained to the Curacy of
Eaton Constantine, Salop. Here, in the immediate neighbourhood of the
famous Roman Station of Uriconium, he acquired a taste for Roman Archae-
ology which never forsook him. He soon afterwards was appointed to the
Perpetual Curacy of Kenley in the same diocese, but in 1841 he was pre-
sented by the Duke of Cleveland to the Rectory of Bathwick cum Wooley,
co. Som. , which benefice he held for thirty years. Here he had an oppor-
tunity during his hours of recreation of pursuing his favourite study of
Roman Remains. In 1S71 he was presented by the son of his previous
patron to the more important benefice of Wrington in the same diocese.
In 1848 he was made a Prebendary of Wells, and became Rural Dean of
Portishead as stated above.
Mr. Scarth was, what is called, a High-Churchman, and worked heartily
with Archdeacon Denison in forming the Bristol Church Union, which was
eventually absorbed in the English Church Union. He did not, however,
we think, become a member of the latter body. Moreover, he was an active
and zealous Parish Priest. His worth was recognised in the diocese, as
shewn by his preferments, and his genial, quiet, modest, and unaffected
manners caused him to be beloved and esteemed by all who knew him.
Mr. Scarth was well known throughout Eng'and and on the Continent
as an accomplished expert in Roman and Romano-British Remains. On
this subject he was a frequent contributor to the Journal of the Royal
Archaeological Institute from 1852 to the last year of his life ; also to the
Somersetshire Archaeological and Natural History Society ; to the Wiltshire
Archaeological Society ; the Bath Field Club ; and our own Society, which
he assisted to inaugurate, and was a member of the Council, and took a
great interest in the progress and work of the Society from that time to the
day of his death, especially in the excavation by Sir John Maclean of the
Roman Villa at Tockington Park in 1S87 and 1888.
The principal work which he published was " Aquae Solis ; or Notices of
Roman Bath," which has been long out of print, and we are glad to hear
that hopes are entertained of a new edition, for which Mr. Scarth had
prepared notes, bringing the notices down to the date of the recent dis-
coveries.
At the request of the S.P.C.K. he wrote for their popular series a most
interesting little book entitled "Roman Britain," which has given great
satisfaction, and is often cited by eminent scholars. It has been stated that
so thorough was his special knowledge of the subject that he was able to
write this useful book off without being obliged to refer to authorities or
make any special preparation.
In 1842 Mi-. Scarth married Elizabeth S. Hamilton, daughter of the Rev.
J. Leveson Hamilton, Rector of Ellenborough, co. Bucks, by Susan his wife,
daughter of the Rev. Richard Woodward, Rector, of Glanworth, co. Cork,
Ireland. His wife and four of his children pre-deceased him, and he was left
a widower with three surviving daughters. His daughter Alice Centenari,
the anchor of the "History of the 'Old Catholic' Movement," died at
Wrington last year to his great grief.
Mr. Scarth had been failing in health for a year or two, and sought
rest and relaxation in the South of Europe. This last year, to escape an
English winter, he, with his two daughters, went by sea to Tangiers, hoping
the change might restore his health. He greatly enjoyed the sunshine and
bracing air of the climate, and was much interested in the vestages of Roman
occupation, as inscribed stones, coins, &c. , which he found there. In one
of his letters from Tangiers he remarks: "Things, apparently, continue
here much as they must have been left on the breaking up of the Roman
Empire. The manners and customs of the people, and their dress and mode
of conveyance remain the same." He took a chill, however, and suffered an
attack of intermittant fever with conjestion of his lungs, which was too
much for him in his feeble condition. He rallied a little, and no serious
apprehensions were felt by Ins daughters until Holy Thursday, when he
became worse, and quietly fell asleep on the morning of Easter Eve, 5th
April, 1890, aged 76. His body was brought home and interred in his own
churchyard at 'Wrington on the 21st of the same month. He will be greatly
missed.
Notices of Recent Archaeological PtfBLlcATtoN& 165
Notices of Recent JUchvcologiral ano |}istoviatl $ubliratiort0.
DIOCESE OF SALISBURY. The Church Plate of the County of Dorset,
with Extracts from the Returns of Church Goods by the Dorset Com-
missioners of Edward VI., 1332. By J. E. Nightingale, F.S.A., Salisbury.
Privately printed 1889.
After centuries of neglect of Church Plate, during which of late years
countless sets of Communion Vessels have been sold at the price of old silver,
or exchanged for modern articles at the same rate, because the old pieces
have been thought heavy and cumbrous, it is gratifying to find that Bishops
and Archdeacons have risen to a higher sense of their duty as guardians of
the goods of the church. In some dioceses and archdeaconries incumbents
of churches have been required to transmit to the Bishops' Registry com-
plete lists of all the Plate and other goods belonging to their respective
churches. This is very satisfactory, as far as it goes, but very few clergy-
men have given sufficient time and attention to the interesting study of
Church Plate to attain that knowledge which would enable them to give an
intelligible description of the Plate they possess.
A few years ago (1SS4) the Rev. W. Lea, Archdeacon of Worcester,
published a carefully made Inventory and Description of the Sacred Vessels
in use in different churches in his Archdeaconry, and made a rule that all
the plate belonging to the church should be produced before him on the
occasions of his Visitations, and, compared with such Inventories. Arch-
deacon Lea's work contains a detailed description of each piece, with
diagrams shewing the forms of the most characteristic. Two years later the
Rev. W. A. Scott Robertson, Hononary Canon of Canterbury, and Vicar of
Throwley, reprinted from the Arcfueologia Cantiana the Church Plate of
Kent (which, probably, he had himself contributed to that Periodical.)
Many pieces are very well engraved in his work, but it is very sad to know
that there is not now remaining a single Mediaeval Chalice in the whole
County of Kent. The little volume issued in 18S6 was the first Part only.
We do not know if a second Part has been issued. The description of the
Church Plate of several other districts has been printed, we may say buried,
in local Arclueological periodicals. It is to be regretted that these commu-
nications have not been reprinted as was done by Canon Scott Robertson.
It is very gratifying that the Bishop of Salisbury has taken the matter
up as regards his own diocese, though limited, at present, to the Arch-
deaconry of Dorset, which is conterminate with the County of Dorset, and
we must congratulate his lordship upon having, in carrying out this under-
taking, secured the invaluable assistance of so accomplished an expert as
Mr. Nightingale. The modus operandi adopted is very interesting, both as
a warning and an example, and may be stated in a few words. The first
step taken was to issue, through the Rural Deans, printed forms of Returns
to be filled up by the incumbent of each parish and transmitted to the
166 N0TICKS OF RECENT ArCH.EoLoGICAL PUBLICATIONS.
Bishops' Registry, giving the special information required of all the Church
Plate belonging to his parish. These Returns, Mr. Nightingale tells us,
form the basis of the handsome volume before us ; but it is evident, as
might be expected, that many of these Returns were of very little value, for
they had to be supplemented by other Returns more skilfully made. A more
or less competent gentleman was afterwards deputed to visit every church in
each deanery, who, on the spot, described each piece submitted to him, and
made such sketches, drawings and rubbings, &c, as seemed to be desirable,
and these Returns, when digested, appear to us to have really formed the
basis of the volume. Mr. Nightingale himself remarks that " when possible
the shortest and most satisfactory way is to visit each parish, Cripps in
hand, and note the details on the spot."
Turning to the result of these enquiries, for we need not follow Mr.
Nightingale through his valuable and interesting historical Introduction, it
is very sad to rind that out of about 300 parish churches in the Archdeaconry,
in each of which one Chalice, at least, was left for the use of the church in
1552, when the churches were despoiled by the Protestant Reformers, three
pieces only of pre-Reformation plate now remain. The question naturally
arises : What has become of the others? This is a question not very difficult
answer very briefly. During the reign of Edward VI. some of the ancient
Chalices were, under the King's injunctions, converted into Communion Cups
of a peculiar type, but on the accession of Queen Mary these cups were
discarded, not being considered suitable for Divine Service. Some of them
doubtless were again converted into Chalices. Edwardian Cups have become
even more rare than the ancient Chalices. Not a single one now exists in
Dorsetshire. On the accession of Quejn Elizabeth another raid was made on
the ancient Chalices by the Protestant zealots. More especially, we regret to
say, by the new Puritan Bishops, not by the Queen, and another style of
cup of a special character, which we shall describe presently, was slowly
introduced, chiefly between 1570 and 1580 instead of what were called
Massing Chalices, and these cups prevailed everywhere. Mr. Nightingale
says : " Speaking roughly, out of about 300 parishes, over 100 retain their
Elizabethan Chalices ; the number possessing Communion Plate of the 17th
century amounts to about seventy ; in the 18th century large additions of
single pieces, as well as sets, were made to many parish churches ; while, as
regards plate belonging to the current century, the greater part of which is
of the present reign, some fifty parishes are found to have exchanged their
old plate for new.
Mr. Nightingale has very properly arranged the Returns under the
respective Deaneries, but, in the remarks on the work which we are about
to make, we propose to notice the most interesting pieces in chronological
order, and in doing, this we shall follow, generally, Mr. Nightingale's des-
criptions.
Under this arrangement the first piece which claims our attention is
the beautiful Chalice of Combe Keynes. This fine piece was exhibited
by Mr. Nightingale at a Meeting of the Society of Antiquaries on the 16th
June, 1887, and is engraved in the Proceedings of that Society. It has been
well preserved and is in excellent condition. Its height is 6| ins.; diameter
of bowl 4 ins.; depth 2ins.; narrowest part of the mullet-shaped base 3^ins.;
widest part to the points of the knops 5| ins. The bowl is broad and conical ;
PLATE IX.
Notices of Decent Arch.eological Publications.
167
the somewhat slender stem is hexagonal and quite plain, with ogee moulded
bands at the junctions. The knob is full sized, having six lobes spirally
twisted with traceried openings, terminating in angels' heads, crowned. It
has a mullet-shaped foot with plain broad-spread and vertically-reeded
moulding. The points terminate with an elegant knop in the shape of a
floriated Lombardic M. In the first compaitment of the base is the usual
crucifix between flowering branches on a hatched ground. The parts gilt
are the interior and outer lip of the bowl, the knob, the crucifixion, also
the mouldings of the stem, the base and the knops. No hall marks are
found, but the date, compared with other examples, is about 1500, perhaps
earlier, certainly not much later. The weight is about 10 ozs. Mr. Night-
ingale says : " This is no doubt the same Chalice found by the Commissioners
of Edward VI. in 1552 and left for the future use of the parish. It falls
under Fb of Messrs. St. John Hope's and Fallow's classification [Plate IX).
This Chalice very much resembles in general character the Clifford example,
though 15 years later, and somewhat smaller, (see ante p. 86 and Plate V.)
The next earliest example of Mediaeval Plate in the County of Dorset is
a Paten at Buckhorn Weston. "It measures 5 ins. in diameter, and varies
from most others in having the second depression formed of hollow shell-like
sexfoils. The foliated spandrels are somewhat coarsely engraved, as is also
the sacred monogram in the centre, enclosed within a circle of spiral lines
or cable. Inside the two lines of the outer rim of the Paten is a very slightly
punched ornament. There are no hall marks, but the date aligned, to it i&
16S Notices of Recent Archaeological Publication?.
between 1510 and 1520. On the rim is either a maker's or a town mark. It
consists of a circle, in which is a cross with a pellet between either limb,
but without any shield or border. (Fig. S.J.
The only other piece of pre- Reformation Plate in Dorsetshire is a Chalice
at Sturminster Marshall. Unfortunately it is not now quite in its original
state. The bowl and base are intact, but, at some early period, the old stem
has been replaced by a plainer one. The present dimensions are, height
6Jins., diameter of bowl 4Jrins. , depth of bowl 24ins., diameter of base 4§ins.
and 4,1 ins. Both bowl and foot carry these hall-marks : viz., a Lombardic T
for 1536, the leopard's head crowned, and the maker's mark T. W. in a shield.
This maker's mark is also found on a Paten belonging to St. Edmund's
Church, Salisbury, of the date of 1533. Mr. Nightingale observes that
" these two pieces are remarkable in more ways than one ; they are the two
latest dated examples of Church Plate at present knowu in England made
just before the Eve of the Reformation. This maker's mark too is the
earliest example of any maker using two letters of the alphabet for his name,
instead of a symbol of some kind as his mark." The general form of the
Chalice is shown on Plate X. "There can be no doubt," Mr. Nightingale
says, " that the upper portion of the present stem, although old, does not
form any part of the original work. The old stem was hexagonal. This is still
indicated by the remains of some cresting with baluster-shaped buttresses
round the upper part of the foot. When the present circular part of the
stem was somewhat clumsily substituted for the older one, the details of the
old work at the junction were nearly obliterated, but enough remains to
shew that the pattern was pretty much the same as that found in a similar
position in the Chalice of Wyle, Wilts, and Trinity College, Oxford," as
shewn in Plate XI. These illustrations are drawn on different scales, both
the Chalices are of the same size. In both the Trinity and the Wylye
examples at each angle of the hexagon is a baluster-shaped ornament,
between which is open battlemented arcading, and in the Sturminster case
there are indications of the same, now destroyed. The new stem is ot the
Elizabethan period, and Mr. Nightingale is of opinion that it is of local
workmanship. On the front of the foot is engraved the crucifixion under
an ogee arch, INRI over the cross, attendant figures of the Blessed Virgin
and St. John, and a skull and bones. Mr. Nightingale says there are only
four examples at present known of this particular type of chalice, and they
vary very slightly.
We have entered more fully into the description of the ancient Altar Plate
than we should have done but for its extreme rarity and interest, and we
shall now proceed to the time of Queen Elizabeth, during whose reign greater
havoc was made (with the exception of the robberies of her father and brother)
with the Church Plate than in any period of English history. Not that the
Queen had any personal objection to chalices, but during the early part of
her reign her position was very critical, and she was pressed forward by the
extreme puritan Bishops and others. An Elizabethan cup is found at Buck-
horn Weston (at which place there is a Mediaeval Paten as noticed above,
Jitj. 8) as early as 1562, but this would seem to be an exceptional case. The
progress of conversion did not proceed very rapidly. In 1567 Parker and
Orindal issued injunctions requiring the disuse of Massing Chalices and the
substitution of decent Communion Cups, but it was not until 1573 and 1574 .
PLATE X
STURM [NSTER MARSHALL.
PLATE XL
trrrw9
WYLYE, WILTS, 1525.
PLATE XII.
ELIZABETHAN CUP WITH PATEN COVER, 1576.
PLATE XIII.
PLATE XIV.
Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications. 169
that any general conversion took place. We know not if any further orders
on the subject were issued, but about this time almost the whole of the
ancient chalices were destroyed. The Patens fared better.
It is very remarkable that all the cups now introduced were of the same
type and ornamented in the same manner, and they were not limited to any
particular diocese, or even province, but extended all over England. So
close is the resemblance that it would seem as if some general order, both as
regards shape and ornament, had been issued, but, notwithstanding the most
diligent search has been made, no such order has been discovered.
It seems to be scarcely necessary to describe these cups. Their character
and ornamentation, with few exceptions, is clearly shewn in PL XII. They
were all supplied with a cover which served as a Paten.
We are told by Mr. Nightingale that, roughly speaking, out of about
300 parishes in Dorsetshire over 100 retain their Elizabethan Chalices, and
most of them retain their Paten Covers. Of these 71 bear either hall-mark
date or have dates inscribed on them, which may be accepted as generally
correct. There is a single cup as early as 1562, to which we have alluded
above, in which year Archbishop Parker propounded various matters for the
better regulation of the Church, amongst others an order for Chalices to be
altered into Communion Cups, but these articles were not allowed. With one
exception, Mr. Nightingale says, no other dated example of a Dorset Com-
munion Cup is found until 1570. What other orders upon this subject were
given, if any, are not known, but they would seem to have been very stringent,
for, with two exceptions, all the hall-marked cups in Dorset fall between the
years 1570 and 1574. The two excepted were not stamped until 1591. There
is a speciality regarding the 32 other cups which are undated. These are all
supposed to have been made by two local craftesmen, who used what arc
called provincial or personal marks. The first of these is 40B&
This mark is found on plate in 30 parishes. On cups with "^. &§&& *
Paten Covers are 20 examples. On cups without covers xuiCr
eight, and on Paten Covers without cups two. The majority of these pieces
have an inscribed date, varying from 1573 to 157S, but about half of the
examples are of the year 1574. They are distributed all over the county,
but the greater number are in the southern part. They vary somewhat in
size and in decoration, but as a rule they are pretty much the same as those
bearing the London Assay mark.
The second of these marks, of which an illustration is here given, is
found on cups of a somewhat different type and style of ornamentation.
(See Chalice and Paten from Gillingham (PL XIII) dated 1574.) It will
be observed that instead of the usual knot on the stem, there is a rlan"e
with cable moulding, and a plain band of intersecting strap-work engraved
round the cup without foliation. In these respects they differ from the
Conventional Elizabethan Cups. They bear some resemblance to the rare
Edwardian Cups. These Elizabethan Cups are found in fourteen parishes,
and in four others without the stamp, but as all, save one, correspond so
exactly in details their number may be said to lie 18, With one exception
these all occur in the northern portion of the county, that on the left bank
of the river Stour.
170 Notices of Recent Arch.eological Publication's.
There is a remarkable 17th century cup at Wraxall. in the Deanery of
Bridport, unlike any other we have ever seen. Mr. Nightingale describes
it as if ins. in height, diameter of bowl 3| ins. diameter of base 3} ins. The
hall-marks consists of a maker's mark twice repeated, the letters H. S. with
a pellet above each letter and a mullet below, all are enclosed within a
heart-shaped shield ; there is also the lion passant, and some indication of
the leopard's head but no date letter. The shape of this cup differs from any
other in the county. The bowl is straight, slanting a little outwards, the
foot is circular, tapering upwards to the bowl almost to a point. The
decoration of both the bowl and base consists of overlapping vertical bands
alternating plain and granulated. Underneath the bowl is a ring of punched
circles like daisies. It is made throughout with somewhat thin plate silver,
all the ornamentation being worked on the surface, and without any mould-
ings. A maker's mark with the same initials H.S., but with different
details, is found in " Old English Plate" from 1615 to 1629. This may
probably indicate about the period of its manufacture. {Plate XIV.)
There is another remarkable cup with Paten Cover at Mosterton.
Height of the cup 5J ins., with cover 7i ins. ; diameter of bowl '&% ins.; of
base 31 ins. There are no marks of any kind, round the bowl is engraved
" Thomas Sandford of Mosterton, Church Worden Anno Domini 1714." The
ornamentation consists of a spiral fluting round the base of bowl, and
double circles of gadroon moulding round the foot and cover. Although
no hall-marks are found, there can be no doubt that the date of this interest-
ing cup is about the period of the inscription. (Plate XV).
From the end of the 16th century Church Plate became more debased
and unecclesiastieal until the recent revival. Nevertheless, heavy clumsy
and inartistic as it was during the last and early part of the present century,
it exhibits the taste and church feeling of the Georgian age, and we trust
it will be carefully preserved as shewing the growth of both during the
Victorian era.
GLEANINGS FROM OLD ST. PAUL'S. By W. Sparrow Simpson,
D.D., F.S.A., Sub-Dean of St, Paul's Cathedral; one of the Chaplains of
His G race the Archbishop of Canterbury, London: Elliott Stock, 1889,
Those who are acquainted with Dr. Simpson's charming little volume,
"Chapters in the History of old S, Paul's," will gladly welcome the gleanings
which come after, and who is there so well qualified to gather them up as
the learned Doctor, who for nearly the third of a century, has been a
member of the cathedral boily and the librarian, and also is Sub-Dean.
Notwithstanding the learned labours of Sir William Dugdale, Sir Henry
Ellis, Archdeacon Hale and Dr, Simpson himself, who all have written upon
the ancient edifice, there are doubtless many historical incidents, both inter-
esting and instructive, to be gleaned after the harvest, and we are gratified
that the present author can encourage us to hope that he will gather up for
us yet another sheaf of gleanings.
In his first chapter, Dr, Simpson treats of the College of Minor Canons
in a brief and popular manner. He wrote very fully on this subject in a
Paper printed in the " Archreologia " twenty years ago, The college consists
PLATE XV.
Notices of Recent Arch.eo logical Publications. 171
of twelve priests, of whom Dr. Simpson himself is one, It was founded in
the time of Richard II. and incorporated by Royal Charter, but the canons
claim that their College existed from a far more remote period, for it appears
from a document in the Harleian collection in the British Museum, (No. 9S0)
that St. Paul's had, before the Norman Conquest, two Cardinals, which
office still continues. They are chosen from the minor canons by the Dean
and Chapter, and in olden times were called Cardinales Chor't. Though the
charter and statutes have been repeatedly confirmed by Royal Letters
Patent, by an act of parliament in 1875 the college was completely changed.
The canons had their own independent endowment of ancient date, and their
own corporate seal, and had their own statutes, which are fully set out in Dr.
Simpson's Paper in the " Archseologia," to which we have referred above,
though they were also subject to the authority of the statutes of the
cathedral, all were annulled.
A very interesting account is given of the Cathedral Library, It has
been repeatedly consumed by fire, and has more than once been reduced
to a very low ebb, but it now contains upwards of '20,000 works, more than
half of which, however, are pamphlets, in which class of literature it is very
rich ; no fewer than 6,348 of them were presented to the library by the late
Dr, Sumner, Bishop of Winchester.
Among the curiosities noticed by Dr, Simpson is a Tonsure Plate, which
is preserved in the MSS, department in the British Museum, It is a circular
plate of copper, 3 ins. in diameter, slightly convex on the one side, and con-
cave on the other, the latter being ornamented with a lion rampant, double
queued, boldly engraved thereon. It is thought to be of the 13th century,
and was used tor determining the shape of the tonsures of the clergy. It
will be remembered that the form of the tonsure was one of the subjects of
contention between St. Augustine and the British bishops in the 7th century.
Dr, Simpson describes the difference in shape of the tonsures as worn by the
clergy of the Roman and of the Celtic churches, and gives much interesting
information upon the subject, and states that the statutes of St. Paul's
cathedral are very strict upon this matter, and contain many references
thereto.
Passing on, the author gives us an account of some ancient Glass of the
old Cathedral, and instances two pieces of armorial glass preserved by the
Society of Antiquaries, which he has figured, and the arms, generally, has
identified. He also notices some early drawings of theaucient church, many
of which are lightly etched.
It is not a pleasant recollection to think of the manner in which, in
modern times, the Church has been desecrated. Lotteries, Dr. Simpson
tells us, were drawn at the great west door, but more shocking abuses
followed, for the hallowed open space in front was used for the execution of
the participators in the Popish plot, and in 1600 Father Garnet suffered
martyrdom in the same place. Moreover, as late as ] 648, that year of horrors,
one of Cromwell's soldiers, said to be a brave young man, only '22 years of
age, who had refused to march with his comrades, was tried by court mar-
shall and shot here, to say nothing of the stabling of horses in the sacred
edifice during the interregnum and of the profanities of Paul's Walk, for all
which sec Dr. Simpson's introduction to documents illustrating the History
of St. Paul's Cathedral (Camden Society, 1880.)
172 Notices of Recent Akch.euumucal Publications.
We now come to the principal chapters in the volume : " Music in St.
Paul's Cathedral." Dr. Simpson's observations are not limited to old St.
Paul's, but are continued down to the present time. It is very interesting,
historically, but we are not competent to judge of it musically, and shall
only add that the interesting volume concludes with some curious miscellaneous
extracts and notes, and that we look forward to another "Sheaf of Gleanings "
when this impression is out of print, which, we think, will not be a long
time.
THE GENTLEMAN'S MAGAZINE LIBRARY; being a Classified Col-
lection of the Chief Contents of the Gentleman's Magazine from 1731 to
186S. Edited by George Lawrence Gomme, F.S.A. Bibliographical Notes,
edited by A. C. Bickley. Elliot Stock, 62, Paternoster Row, 18S9.
We consider this volume as the most interesting of the series yet published.
It is practically a continuation of its predecessor, but whilst that treated
chiefly of Book-making, Selling and Storing, in this it is endeavoured to
bring together particulars of the books themselves, and in addition to collect
information on a variety of subjects which hitherto has existed only in the
disconnected form unavoidable in periodical publications.
It is divided into two sections — Notes on Special Books and Notes on
Special Subjects, and under each of these heads we have numerous notices of
great and varied curiosity and value, and these are supplemented by a table
of some sixty notes of erudite Bibliographical Knowledge.
The first section contains observations on many very rare and valuable
volumes, some of them unique. The first work treated of is Buonaccorsu's
Controversia de Nobilitatr, which is carefully and critically examined, with
a view to the discovery of the author. After this, follows the examination
of several rare Caxtons, one of which, a unique copy of the Chronicles of
England, of the first edition, 1482, which was found by Mr. Richard Price in
1810, in the collection of Mr. Win. Barnes, of Redland House, near Bristol.
Of the books under this section, a very careful and particular description is
given of the Decameron, to admit of its identification with the copy, ' ' II
Decamerone de Boccaccio fol. M. G. Ediz. Prim. Venet Valdarfar, 1471.
The extreme scarcity of which edition needs no proof, beyond the acknow-
ledged and recorded fact that after all the fruitless researches of more than
three hundred years, not one other perfect copy is yet known to exist." It
is very curious also to note the prices at which this rare work has changed
hands in the early part of the present century. It was offered for sale at
the rooms of Mr. R. H. Evans, the famous book auctioneer, in 1819. It had
been bought by the Duke of Roxburgh for £100, and in 1812 was sold to the
Duke of Marlborough for £2,200. At Mr. Evans' sale it was sold, in the trade,
for 873 guineas [£915 15s.] (If brought into the market what would Mr.
Quaritch give for it now ?) Many other works of great interest are treated
of, but we must pass on.
In the section on Special Subjects, the class of books first treated of is
Almanacks. The subject is very curious, and amusing. The earliest alma-
nack in print is generally admitted to be that of John Muller, of Monte
Regio, which was printed in Nuremberg in 1472. He gave the characters of
each year and of the months, and shewed the places of the planets, and
Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications. 173
foretold the eclipses 30 years in advance. This almanack, it is said, sold for
ten crowns of gold. The author was better known as Regiomontanus. There
are, however, many early manuscript almanacks in the Libraries of the
British Museum aud Corpus Christi College, Cambridge, and there was a
very curious one in the possession of Mr, Jackson, of Exeter, made in the
reign of King Edward III. It consisted of slips of parchment folded in
the shape of a flat stick or lath in, it is said, the Saxon fashion. The
first account, however, which we have of almanacks in this country, appears
in the Year Book of King Henry VII., or about fifteen years later than
that of Muller. The first periodical of this description printed in England
was issued from the press of Wynkyn de Worde in 1508, which was
arranged for twelve years, since this time a continuous stream of such
productions, continually swelling in number, may be traced to our own days.
We can refer only very briefly to the contents of old almanacks, irrespec-
tive of the meteorological forecast of changes of weather, &c, day by day,
and predictions of eclipses, &c, the writers indulged in Astrological
prophecies of important political events, expressed in very equivocal language,
as sagaciously recommended by the almanack maker, Gardens, at the time
of William III., who observes that astrologers ought never to pronounce any-
thing absolutely or peremptorily concerning future contingencies, the reason
is lest he bring himself and his art under censure and condemnation if it
happen that he take not his measures truly, and the event answers not his
prediction. Poor Carden himself, it is said, having foretold his own death
starved himself to prove the truth of his own prediction.
The number of almanacks issued is amazing. In 1828 the stamp duty of
15d. per copy on English almanacks amounted to £30,136 3s. 9d., shewing
an issue of 451,593 copies. In 1834 the stamp duty was removed, from
which time the issues increased. In 1S39 they amounted to 521,000 copies.
It is said that of Murphy's famous almanack alone 75,000 copies were
printed and 70,000 sold. So far as we are aware there are no means of
knowing the number of almanacks now printed, but we know the number
has vastly increased.
The subject next treated of is that of Newspapers, the discussion upon
which is extremely curious and interesting. The origin of newspapers and
their early history are very obscure, as is also the definition of what really is
a newspaper, but, practically, we know pretty well of what a newspaper
consists.
It has been very difficult to determine in what country newspapers
were first published. In England they were first established during the
great rebellion of the 17th century, under the title of " Mercuries." One at
least, " Mercurius Aulicus "was carried on in behalf of the Royal cause. This
was first issued in 1642. The Parliament had several, as " Mercurius
Rusticus," &c., and, so far as we know, these were the first genuine news-
papers published in this country,
A remarkable incident in the History of Newspapers occurred at the end
of the last century. In 1798 was given to the public, what purported to be
a newspaper, entitled " the English Mercury " of 158S, giving an account of
the Spanish Armada. It was received as a genuine English Journal, and
was quoted by authors as an authority for many years. It was only in 1839
174 Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications.
that the fraud was discovered and traced to Philipe York the eldest son of
the first Earl of Hardwick, the great Chancellor. Philip succeeded his
father in the title in 1764, and died in 1790. What his motive could have been
for this act is a mystery, for he never published the document or made any
use of it, though in his library catalogue he treated it as genuine. News-
papers were printed in Germany a century before they appeared in England.
It appears from the Gentleman's Magazine for 1731, that the number of
newspapers then printed in England was forty ; in America, two. In England
in 1831, they had increased to 100. At page 160 of the volume before us, is
given a table of the circulation of London Journals in 1833 and 1835, which
then was enormous, and doubtless is now far greater.
The next subject treated of is the origin, antiquity, and use of Cards.
It has been generally thought that they are of great antiquity, but it is
stated in an account of Playing Cards, translated from the French, that
cards were invented about the year 1390, for the diversion of King Charles
IX. of France, who had fallen into state of melancholy, and this statement
is supported by the following argument : 1st — That no cards are to be seen
in any sculpture or other work of art of an earlier period, and are frequently
represented afterwards. 2nd — That no Royal Edict, on Ecclesiastical
canon exists forbidding the use of cards, but later they were strictly
interdicted to the clergy, and by Royal edict to the laity, as liable to
interfere with the manly exercise of the practise of arms, but they were
sanctioned as a pastime for ladies pro spinulis, for pins and needles. The
French consider their design as representing the four states oi classes of men
in the kingdom ; but for the particulars of this we must refer the reader to
the volume.
This is followed by observations on the works of many eminent men,
among whom, we may mention those of Thomas Lodge, Sir Philip Sidney,
Sir Kenelm Digby, and notes on various class subjects, all written in a
pleasant and scholarly manner, the last, by the late John Doran, entitled
"the Tailors measured by the Poets," is replete with learning, wit and
humour.
BARNSTAPLE and the Northern Part of Devonshire during the
Great Civil War, 1642-1646. By Richard W. Cotton. Privately printed,
1889.
This is the most interesting volume. In addition to a very lucid narrative
of the military transactions of the civil war in the south-western counties,
especially in Devon and Cornwall, it throws a flood of light on the social
condition and character of the inhabitants, and forms a worthy supplement
to the "Memorials of the Civil War in Herefordshire and the adjacent
Counties," by the late Rev. John Webb, F.S A. (noticed in Vol. IV. of the
Transactions of this Society).
The authors of these works, however, regard the subject matter upon
which they treat from different points of view. Mr. Webb was thoroughly
loyal to the cause of the King, whilst Mr. Cotton's sympathies evidently
lean strongly to that of the Parliament, but they severally seem to have
judged with equal impartiality both of men and things.
Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications. 175
The work before us primarily treats of the manner in which the war,
and the events arising out of it, affected the little Devonshire town of
Barnstaple. We were not prepared to rind the importance it assumed in
this terrible struggle, second to very few towns in the kingdom, and Mr.
Cotton does ample justice to the military skill, steady perseverance, and
heroic defence made by its inhabitants.
Mr. Cotton divides his work into four parts, not chronologically, but
marked out by certain distinct epochs in the history of Barnstaple during
the period from 16-42 to 1646, inclusive ; but first he gives a short introduc-
tory chapter detailing briefly the causes which led up to this sanguinary
struggle. He then takes up the history of Barnstaple from the commence-
ment of the war to the surrender of the town to Prince Maurice on 2nd Sep.
1643.
Barnstaple was intensely Puritan, and, of course, adopted the cause of
the Parliament against the King with all that rigid obstinacy which might
be expected from that party. Almost before any actual hostilities had
taken place, certainly before a single Royalist soldier had entered the
county, Mr. Cotton tells us, with a precipitancy which was noticed with
wonder at the time, the corporation of Barnstaple, in an evil hour, decided
upon fortifying their town.
Mr. Cotton informs us that of the municipal documents of Barnstaple a
mass is known to have actually perished, through almost inconceivable
neglect, within comparatively recent years. Those that survive, although
unusually rich and extending from the 14th century downwards, ai'e in a
fragmentary state, and the records of the period to which this relation has
reference are few and disconnected. There is, however, one book, called a
" Remembrance Book," of which Mr. Cotton has made considerable use, and
from this it appears that the first step actually taken towards the fortifi-
cation of the town was on the 8th of August, 1642. And Mr. Cotton
remarks that the limited ideas which this book betrays of the impending
demands upon the corporation consequent upon their adherance to the
Parliamentary cause are amusing. ' ' It was agreed that in this emergency
the mayor for the ensuing year shoidd allow the sum of -£10 out of his stipend
of £30, and spare so much cost at his feast when he is sworn ! ! " neverthe-
less from this date to the 27th August in the following year the inhabitants
raised and expended a sum of nearly £14,000 upon the fortifications and
other expenses connected with the war upon which they had so recklessly
embarked. It does not, however, appear that they ever faltered in the
resolution they had adopted.
It is curious to observe the growth of the proceedings for the defence of
the town. The clouds began to gather, and the next step was to strengthen
the old night-watch, and a score of the most substantial of the inhabitants
volunteered to serve on it in turn. Others undertook each to furnish a
musket, and besides this a dozen new muskets were ordered to be bought
" att the charge of the towne with snappanges," which, Mr. Cotton informs
us was a newly invented spring-fire-lock, which had been recently introduced
from Holland." James (Mil. Diet.) describes a Snaphange as " a gun which
tired without a match." A committee was also appointed "to pceed on to
finish and pfect the fortifications. Mr., otherwise Captain Penfound Curry,
a buccaneering captain who had carried letters of marque, was engaged at a
176 Notices of Recent Arch.kological Publications.
salary of £30 a year to drill a Train Band and the Volunteers, and to order
the watch.
The lower classes, and some few of the gentry in Devonshire, were in
feeling strongly Puritanical, and hence sympathisers with the Parliamentary
party. When the Earl of Bath, who had been appointed by the King
Commissioner of Array for Devon, proceeded to execute his commission at
South Molton, supported by the principal gentry of the county, he was
assailed by a disorderly mob of a 1000 men, women, and children, armed
with scythes, bill-hooks, pitch-forks and all kinds of rustic weapons, and
compelled, at the peril of his life, to desist. Lord Chandos, in similar
circumstances, had been treated in like manner at Cirencester three weeks
previously, and the Marquis of Hertford, who was sent with a similar com-
mission into Somersetshire, failed to execute it. He succeeded, however, in
raising a small body of troops, but rinding the general feeling of the district
too much opposed to him he embarked at Minehead for Wales, and his
troops proceeded into Cornwall under the command of Sir John Digby.
The quietude of Cornwall had been disturbed by the proceedings on her
borders. Sir Bevil Grenville had now (August) adopted the Royalist cause
and united with the loyal Cornish gentry in endeavouring to execute the
Commission of Array at Launceston, in which they were opposed by the
local Parliamentary committee, through whose influence Sir Ralph Hopton
and his troopers at the Michaelmas Quarter Sessions, held at Bodmin, was
presented in ordinary form of law by the Grand Jury as divers men,
unknown, who were lately come armed into that county contra pacem, &c.
The tables were turned, however, when Sir Ralph appeared to the present-
ment, and quietly produced his commission. The Cornish proclivities, not-
withstanding this show of opposition, were as overwhelmingly Royalist as
those of Devonshire were Parliamentarian. Through the action of the
Sheriff, Francis Basset, afterwards knighted, himself a Royalist, the posse
comitatis was raised, and by these means in a few days about 3000 foot of
trained militia were got together, and appeared before Launceston, then
occupied by the Parliamentarians, who immediately evacuated the place.
Sir Ralph intended to march eastward, but the Cornish men, being in fact
the Sheriff's men, lefused to go out of their own county, as they had a
perfect right to do, and the army quickly melted away, and the work had
to be begun afresh.
The general course of this unhappy internecine war is too well known to
need our following Mr. Cotton through his narrative, though there are some
details of great interest which he has brought more strongly into light : e.g.
the Battle of Modbury. Whilst the general struggle was being contested
elsewhere, and at a distance, the two sister counties of Devon and Cornwall,
for such in fact they may well be called, for through continual intermarriages
the ancient gentry were all more or less related, had a small but vigorous war
between themselves. Mr. Cotton, from his local knowledge, has described
the sites of the various battles and skirmishes in a very graphic manner, and
his relations of the incidents of the actions are given with greater spirit and
vigour than is usually found from a non -military pen. This is strongly
marked in his description of the famous Battle of Stratton, in which the
men of Devon and Cornwall were arrayed against each other, and the latter
Notices of .Recent Archaeological Publications. 177
obtained a complete victory, The discomfiture and annihilation of the
Parliamentary army produced the greatest alarm in Barnstaple. Money
was immediately raised to strengthen the defences, but the town very soon
afterwards surrendered to Prince Maurice, who granted the inhabitants very
favourable terms, which was acknowledged by the Mayor and Corporation
in a letter to the Prince, which Mr. Cotton says " can only be characterised
as abject and hypocritical." Mr. Cotton's remark upon this letter would,
at first sight, appear to be very harsh, but subsequent events proved him to
be justified, at least as far hypocrisy was concerned.
Part II. of the work embraces the period from the surrender of Barn-
staple to Prince Maurice to its revolt to the parliament, 2nd Sept. 1643, to
•26th June, 1644. In the last few days of June, 1644, during the absence of
the few Royalist horse which had been stationed at Barnstaple, and had
been withdrawn to act as an escort of the Queen in her flight from Exeter
in terror on the approach of Essex and his army, the opportunity was taken
by the townsmen to raise a revolt. It appears to be very evident, however,
that this was not a sudden ebulition. but had been secretly plotted for
some time previously, and that the conspirators only awaited a favourable
opportunity.
Intelligence of the petty rebellion very quickly reached Prince Maurice,
who was then at Exeter in attendance upon the Queen. Major Paget was
immediately sent with a party to prevent disturbances, but these disturbances
had already arisen. Major Paget attempted to enter the town, but finding the
townsmen up in arms he withdrew to await support. Sir John Digby
was sent to his assistance with a strong reinforcement, and the combined
troops, numbering some 500 or 600 strong, with great difficulty fought their
way into the town. The townsmen offered a gallant resistance. The struggle
in the streets was a very obstinate one, but resulted in the defeat and
repulse of the assailants with considerable loss. Mr. Cotton gives a very
vivid account of this fight, for which we must refer to his pages.
Mr. Cotton observes that during the few weeks in which Barnstaple was
held by the Parliamentary troops we are absolutely without any written
record of the state of affairs within it. Indeed, he says, " that of all the
incidents of the Civil War in Devonshire, those which have received the
least illustration from the local historian are the military operations which
affected the county in the latter part of the summer of 1644." We all know
that the army of Essex, which had followed the King into Cornwall, was in
a desperate condition, and that he was imploring the parliament for help
which it could not give him, and that he was shut tip as in a cul de titc at
Fowey. On the 31st August, however, through some negligence on the part
of the Royalist officers, a large portion of Essex's horse managed to escape
through the lines, led by Sir William Balfour, and the following day the
remainder of the force surrendered upon favourable conditions. Orders were
promptly given to the Royalist commanders in Devonshire to use every effort
to intercept Essex's fugitive cavalry, and North Devon became a scene of
the utmost turmoil. Middleton, the Parliamentary general in Devon, was
believed to be somewdiere in the county with a large force, and Goring was
cautioned not to follow the pursuit too near him. Middleton meanwhile had
marched across the county and threw himself into Barnstaple with 2000
Vol. XIV. >'
ITS Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications.
horse. Essex's horse, which had escaped from Cornwall, marched to Crediton,
where they divided into two parties, one making its escape toward Lyme,
and the other joined Middleton at Barnstaple. Interesting as these marches
and counter-marches are, as related by Mr. Cotton, we cannot follow them,
but must confine our view to Barnstaple. It is obvious that that little town,
with surrounding country scoured by the Royalist troops, could not support
a garrison of some 3000 horse besides foot soldiers, and Middleton and
Balfour had to make their escape, as they succeeded in doing across Exmoor
Forest to Taunton, leaving Barnstaple to its fate.
As to the miserable condition of Essex's discomfitted and demoralised
foot soldiers making their way through Devonshire, we must refer to Mr.
Cotton's work. Our task is with Barnstaple. After the departure of
Middleton's and Balfour's cavalry it was left with a garrison of about 600
foot soldiers. In consequence of the fortifications having been quite neglected
during the Parliamentarian occupation, and, moreover, being unprovided
with ammunition, it was naturally indefensible. In these circumstances
overtures were made to General Goring by the Mayor and Corporation for
the surrender of the town to the King, and on the 12th Sept. 1644, Goring
in form sent in a summons to the Mayor to surrender, and after some
negotiations, terms, very favourable to the town, were agreed upon on the
17th, and the place was evacuated by the Parliamentary garrison the same
day. This ends the third section of Mr. Cotton's work.
The fourth and last part, covering the period from Sept. 17th, 1644, to
14th April, 1646, though by no means the least interesting, we must, for the
want of space, pass over very lightly, having already exceeded our usual
limits. The war raged very hotly in Devon during the winter of 1645-6,
but the Royal army was grievously disorganised in consequence of the
jealously, quarrels, and insuboixlination of the principal officers. In the
hope of being able to heal these differences and create a better feeling the
King commissioned the young Prince of Wales, though only 15 years of age,
as Generalissimo of the whole of his army in Devon and Cornwall, to act
with a council of experienced officers, but it seems not to have attained the
object the King desired. It led, however, to one of the most striking
incidents relating to Barnstaple, as the Prince for a time made the town his
head-quarters and kept a sort of court there for about a month, until the
country became so much disturbed that Barnstaple was thought no longer
safe for him, and he retired to Tavistock.
We must, however, make a brief digression to the surrender of the town
to the King and the circumstances arising out of it. Although it was
provided by the Articles of Capitulation that the town "should be free
from plunder," and that no new garrison should be put into it," it was not
unlikely that when the Royal troops entered the place upon its evacuation
they could not be altogether restrained from the first offence. This, un-
doubtedly, was technically a breach of the Articles, and excited the rebellious
and rancorous feelings which still lurked in the breasts of some of the
inhabitants, and led to disorders and acts of violence. This caused Six-
John Berkeley, then Governor of Exeter and commander of the Royal forces
in the district, to send his lieutenant, Sir Allen Apsley, with a small body
of troops, as Governor of Barnstaple, to repress existing disorders and
Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications. 179
preserve peace in future. This was another grievance to the townspeople,
and tended to increase their dissatisfaction. Sir Allen is represented as
arrogant and imperious. He was young, and probably hot-headed and
indiscreet, but upon the whole he seems to have acted fairly well. He set
to work vigorously to restore the fortifications of the town ; the great fort
was converted into a sort of citadel to hold a body of troops, the castle
works were also strengthened, and both strongholds were provisioned,
equipped, and made capable of withstanding a siege, which it eventually did,
after an assault, for 49 days under the direction of the most renowned and
able of the Parliamentary generals, among whom were the renowned Admiral
Blake and the scarcely less famous Major-General and Admiral Richard
Deane.
The town surrendered to General Fairfax on the 14th April 1646, which,
coupled with the defeat of the army under Lord Hopton, virtually closed
the war in the west, and released the army of Sir Thomas Fairfax for final
operations, which brought this unnatural war to a close and led to more
tragical events.
POPULAR COUNTY HISTORY.— A History of Cumberland. By
Richard S. Ferguson, M.A., LL.M., F.S.A., Chancellor of Carlisle, &c, &c.
London : Elliot Stock, 62, Paternoster Row, 1890.
No gentleman could have been selected for the preparation of this volume so
well qualified as the learned Chancellor of Carlisle, and the result is what
might be expected from one so intimately acquainted with the county and
so able as he. The volume, therefore, is of more than usual interest, though
its author simply describes it as an attempt to discharge the function of a
General Introduction to an old-fashioned County History in two or three
quarto volumes.
After giving a description of the situation of the county and its boun-
daries the Chancellor offers some remarks upon the pre-historic inhabitants,
leading his readers on to the Celtic migration, of which, with Messrs.
Freeman & Sullivan, he considers there were two waves ; so that the Romans
on their arrival found the district of Cumberland occupied by three distinct
races of men, but the Celtic immigrants dispossessed the pre-historic men,
or absorbed them, and occupied the district under the name of the Brigantes.
These again were eventually conquered by the Romans. An interesting
account is given of the Roman occupation, tracing the various roads con-
structed by that people, and describing their forts and towers, but of this
class of antiquities the most interesting is the author's account of the great
Barrier of Hadrian, the trail of the Roman wall, which extended from
Bowness, on the Solway, to Wallsend, on the Tyne, a distance of 73| miles,
and having stations, castles, and watch towers at an average distance from
each other of about four miles along the whole distance. This wall, however,
was only a portion of a vast system of defence which embraced all Cum-
berland. For about four centuries the Romans ruled the country. About
the middle of the fourth century the northern part of Roman Britain was
greatly harrassed by inroads of the Picts and Scots, and towards the end of
that century these people formed a league with the Attacotti and the
Saxons on the south-eastern coast. The Roman Empire was tottering to
ISO Notices of Recent Akcii.eotxioic.w. Publications.
its fall. It was pressed on every side and divided in itself, the generals,
severally, contending for the Imperial power. Eventually, about the middle
of the fifth century, so great were the necessities of the empire nearer
home, that all the legions were withdrawn from Britain, and with them
all the flower of the British youth.
During the intricacies of the Saxon period and the introduction of
Christianity, Mr. Ferguson steers his way. His relation is very concise and
of great interest, but our own limited space forbids us from following him,
and we must pass on to the Danish invasion. BTalfdene was the Danish
leader, who ravaged Cumberland and destroyed Carlisle, burning the town,
throwing down the walls, and killing man, woman and child, the inhabitants
there then being numerous. And in this state it is said Carlisle remained 200
years without an inhabitant. The monks of the abbey were driven out, and
were accompanied by Eadred the Abbot, carrying with them the body
of St, Cuthbert, with which they traversed the six northern counties for
seven years, seeking a place of rest and finding none, until, at last, the
Saint's remains were deposited at Durham.
The anarchy which arose in Northumbria after the death of King
Eagfrith — the dismemberment of that powerful kingdom — the invasion of
the Danes and the settlement of a colony of that people — the Conquest of
the British Kingdom of Cumbria, which included Cumberland, by Edmund
King of the West Saxons, and his grant of the county to Malcolm I., King
of the Scots, on the condition that he should become the ally of England by
land and sea, especially against the Danes, we pass over, and refer the
reader to the interesting particulars in Chancellor Ferguson's work, and to
a valuable Paper on the Early History of Cumberland, by Mr. John Hodge-
son Hinde in the Archceoloyieal Journal, Vol. XVI. , page 217. Cumberland
thus became a fief of the English crown.
Malcolm II., however, appears to have allowed the Danes to establish a
colony within his dominions, and this, or some other offence, led Ethelred,
the over-lord of Cumbria, in a.d. 1000, to overrun and devastate the county
and seize it into his own hands. There is much difference of opinion
among authorities upon this question. Mr. E. A. Freeman, however, sug-
gests that "we have here lighted on the clue to the great puzzle of Cumbrian
ethnology." He says " that Cumberland and Westmoreland are to this
day largely Scandinavian needs no proof ; but we have no record of the
process by which they became so." He adds, "this is the only mention of
a Danish colonization by any historian, but this occupation has not passed
away without leaving traces behind, both in the language of the people and
in the nomenclature of the district," and this view is confirmed by the
author (pp. 153 and 159). In what manner the quarrel between the over-
lord and the vassal King was adjusted does not appear. But, as at an early
period, as stated by Mr. Hodgson-Hinde, all the Cumbrian territory south of
the Solway had been severed from the rest of Malcolm's possessions, it would,
we think, seem probable that it occurred at this time. The severed district,
the author tells us, was overrun in 1070 by Gospatric, Earl of Northumber-
land, in revenge for the devastation of Teesdale by the Scots. The Earl,
though shortly afterwards deprived of his Earldom and a fugitive at
Malcolm's court, seems to have been able to put his son Dolfin into possess-
ion of the district wrenched from Malcolm, but it is suggested that Malcolm
Notices of Recent Archaeological Pcblications. 181
might have so placed him for purposes of his own. In the year 1092 William
Rufus, without any known cause, sent an army into Cumbria, dispossessed
Dolfin, and annexed the territory to the English crown, and the Saxon
Chronicle, under this date, states that "William placed a garrison in Carlisle
and returned to the south, and sent thither a great number of churlish folk
with wives and cattle that they might settle there and till the ground."
It is found that in the reign of Henry I. the land of Carlisle was in the
possession of Ranulf de Meschines, but whether by the gift of the King or by
that of his brother Rufus is questionable. It is, however, clear that Ranulf
devoted a large portion of it to the foundation of the Priory of Witheral.
Mr. Ferguson considers that the grant conveyed Palatine jurisdiction, like
the Earldom of Chester and others, in which, according to Bishop Stubbs,
the Earls were endowed with the superiority of whole counties, so that all
the landowners held feudally of them, in which they received the whole
profits of the courts and exercised all the jure regalia or royal rights,
nomination of sheriffs, and held their own councils and acted as independent
princes, save the obligation of homage and fealty to the King.
Ranulf married Lucia, daughter of Ivo Talboise, Earl of Angiers, by
Lucia, daughter and heir of Thorold, Lord of Spalding, co. Lincoln, and
relict of Roger de Romara, by which he acquired vast possessions in addition
to those granted to him by the King. He parcelled out the most exposed
part of the land of Carlisle into three baronies : viz., Gilsland, Lyddale, and
Burgh by Sands, and when Hen. I. resumed possession of the land of Carlisle
and constituted Cumberland and Westmorland counties, he carved five ad-
ditional baronies out of Cumberland, an account of all which is given by the
author, together with the devolution of the baronies and a description of the
Forest of Inglewood and of the City of Carlisle.
The settlement of Cumberland was interrupted on the death of Henry I.
by the civil war between the Empress Maud, on behalf of her son, and
Stephen of Blois, who, notwithstanding his oath of allegiance to King
Henry's daughter, had usurped the throne. This usurpation was so sudden
and unexpected that for a time it was submitted to. The old King of Scots,
only, took up arms on behalf of his niece, but he was pacified by the surren-
der of Cumberland and Westmorland, to the possession of which he had,
personally, strong claims, though he refused to do homage to Stephen because
of his oath to Matilda. Henry his son did homage instead of his father, and
assumed the title of Prince of Cumberland. This arrangement did not last
long. In 3rd Henry II. Cumberland was recovered to the Crown of England,
though not without some compensation, for to the Scots were conceded all
the crown demesnes in Cumberland with the exception of the City of
Carlisle.
Of the municipal history of this city Chancellor Ferguson gives us a very
interesting account, referring to the ancient charters under which it enjoyed
divers privileges and franchises, and to the bye-laws for the governance of
the community, which give us a clear insight into the municipal life in
Carlisle in mediaeval times.
The remaining chapters of the work, though very interesting, are written
with great brevity, and afford us little information beyond what can be
gathered from general history. There is, however, one incident which may
have special interest to most of our readers, especially as it has not, as far
182 Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications.
as we know, been noticed by any of the Gloucestershire historians. We
allude to the case of Thomas Merks, Bishop of Carlisle. He was a monk at
Westminster, and was advanced to the Bishopric of Carlisle in 1397. If he
was not remarkable for anything else he was remarkable for his loyalty to
King Richard II. Bishop Merks was the only person in parliament to protest
against the deposition of that unfortunate sovereign. For this he was
deprived of his Bishopric in 1399. He was afterwards appointed Vicar of
Sturihinster Newton, in Dorsetshire, and on 13th August, 1404, upon the
presentation of the Abbot and Convent of Westminster, he was instituted to
the Rectory of Toddenham, in Gloucestershire. He died in 140S, for on
13th January, 140S-9, one Robert lily, alias Weston, was instituted to the
vacancy caused by his death.
Cljr
(3f Tf^ /if both in Latyn and Englyshe : being a facsimile reprint
of the earliest extant English Reading Book, with an
Introduction by E. S. Shuckburgh, M.A., Librarian of Emmanuel College.
London : Elliot Stock, 02, Paternoster Row, 1889.
This little book is a photographical facsimile of what is believed to be a
unique specimen of the ABC Primers published soon after the breach with
Rowe, in the reign of Henry VIII. The original is in the library of Em-
manuel College, Cambridge. It is not dated, but the colophon describes
it as " Imprynted at London in Paules Chyrch yard at the sygne of the
Mayden's head by Thomas Petyt." This Thomas Petyt is supposed to have
been a relative of a famous French printer, John Petyt, who worked in
London from 1536 to 1554. This A B C, it is supposed, may probably be
regarded as an Introduction to a larger Primer, and the late Mr. Henry
Bagshaw, in a Paper read before the Cambridge Antiquarian Society in 1875,
said he was satisfied it must have been printed about 1538. In this year
was printed by John Petyt, under the King's injunctions, the first English
Primer to which this A B C is supposed to have been intended as an Intro-
duction, but it was not so used. In the Introduction to ,the authorised
book, it is recited as being most essential that the multitude of Christians
should learn by heart the ten commandments, the cieeds and the Lord's
prayer, called the Pater Noster. It was intended as an elementary reading
book, a first book of religious instruction for children, as well as of ordinary
prayers for adults. Mr. Bradshaw called it " The Layman's Prayer Book,"
and Mr. Masked describes it as essentially " The Prayer Book of the Laity."
In this A B C, however, the Ave Maria appears, but the ten commandments
are omitted.
"This book, then, is the earliest known specimen of this class of un-
authorised primers containing the alphabet and the prayers and elementary
religious formularies used in the teaching of children and the daily life of
home." Godless Board Schools did not then exist!
Mr. Stock has had the little work tastefully printed on thick hand-made
paper, and it is a little gem of its kind.
Notices of Recent Arch.eological Publications. 183
PROCEEDINGS OF THE CLIFTON ANTIQUARIAN CLUB for 1884-88.
Vol. 1. Edited by Alfred E. Hudd, F.S.A., Hon. Secretary. Bristol :
Printed for the Club by J. Wright & Co., 188S.
This little Society, which is limited to fifty ordinary members, has recently
issued its first volume of Proceedings, which is exceedingly well got up, and
contains many very excellent Papers. Where all are so good it is difficult,
and may appear invidious, to select any for special notice. We cannot
refrain, however, from calling attention to some few : e.g., The first Paper
in the volume is a pleasing and fanciful one by Mr. John Taylor, the City
Librarian, " On Anglo-Norman Doorways." A more substantial Paper is
communicated by Lieut. -Colonel Bramble, "On Mediaeval Armour." The
different fashions of armour which prevailed at different periods in England
from the Norman Conquest until the time when defensive armour was
altogether abandoned, though distinct enough in their character, are little
understood, and the most ridiculous anachronisms have arisen, and Colonel
Bramble has very judiciously given a series of figures shewing at one glance
the succession of the several styles, and the period during which they were
respectively in vogue. The student therefore has an opportunity of com-
paring one style with another, a method of instruction more effective than
much writing. Mr. Francis Fox Tuckett, F.R.G.S., has contributed some
very interesting "Notes on Ancient Norwegian Wooden Churches, with
some notices of similar early structures in Great Britain and Ireland ;" and
by the same author there is a still more striking Paper of great interest
" On some Optical Peculiarities of Ancient Painted Glass." Poets have
written in glowing terms of the lustrous colours shed by the moon through
the storied windows of a church or hall, but Mr. Tuckett, from personal
observation, had arrived at the conclusion that, so far as ancient glass is
concerned, it is no more than a poet's dream ; for that ancient glass, however
rich and gorgeous its colours may still appear to the eye, no appreciable
trace of them can be detected on the walls, floors, or columns of a building,
even ^when its ancient painted windows are most illuminated by the sun
himself in his highest splendour, and he relates that being at a dinner party
during the Meeting of the British Association in Birmingham in lS8b", on
alluding to this fact he was laughed at and chaffed by some distinguished
lights in science, and that having but a small array of facts then at his
command he might have modestly collapsed had not his friend, Dr. Sebastian
Evans, who happened to be present, after allowing the sceptics to commit
themselves fully, come to the rescue in the most effectual manner, justifying
his own right to speak on such a subject with some authority, on the ground
of having been for seven years manager of Messrs. Chance's Glass Works.
He pronounced Mr. Tuckett's statement to be absolutely correct ; adding,
further, that he had, on behalf of that firm, devoted several months to
studying and drawing the famous windows (mostly 13th century) of Chartres
Cathedral, and that the one infallible method of distinguishing between the
ancient glass and the more modern insertions was to allow the sunlight to
stream through the windows upon a sheet of paper fastened on a board, when
any resultant spots of colour corresponded exclusively with the more recent
additions."
It is very singular that clergymen and others, who for years have been
constantly about churches having windows of ancient glass, should not
184 Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications.
have been familiar with this interesting fact now brought under notice. It
shews how very unobservant we most of us are of facts constantly before our
eyes.
Mr. Tuckett points out in great detail the causes of this remarkable
phenomenon. It arises, he says, from decay of the surface of the glass from
chemical and other causes, upon the details of which we have not space to
enter, but the effect upon ancient glass, even on a sunny day, is equivalent
to that caused on a gloomy day in the case of modern glass. The difference
is so distinct as to afford a valuable and easy test of the age of glass in
regard to the broad question of its being ancient or modern. There is an
unfortunate instance, Mr. Tuckett remarks, at Fairford, which affords a
specially good test. When the old glass of the great west window was sent
away for restoration it literally never was restored at all, but an entirely
new production took its place, whilst the ancient glass still remains in the
lower and larger division, and illustrates the correctness of Mr. Tuckett's
theory. Other examples may be seen in the Major's Chapel, Bristol, and
elsewhere.
At a meeting of the Club on the 20th Dec. 1887, the Rev. The Honorable
Walter J. Clifford, 8. J., exhibited a remarkable collection of coloured
drawings, photographs, engravings, and other illustrations of copes of the
Roman Catholic Church, a description of which is printed in the Proceedings,
to which is appended Notes on the stitches employed in the embroidery of
s.ueh copes, by Mrs. Bagnall-Oakeley.
The Hon. Secretary, Mr. A. E. Hudd, F.S.A., concludes the volume with
a very able and interesting "History of the Hospital of St.Katherine, Bright-
bow (Bedminster), near Bristol," in which he traces its devolution from its
foundation by Robert (in) Lord Berkeley, at the end of the 12th or beginning
of the 13th century, through 2(5 masters to its spoliation by Henry VIII. ,
and the final grant of its site in 1587. On this site now stands a huge tobacco
factory.
A DICTIONARY OF HERALDRY, with upwards of 2500 tine illustrations.
By Charles Norton Elvin, M.A., Author of Handbook of Mottoes, Anec-
dotes of Heraldry, (fee, <Lc, d-c. London : Kent & Co., 23, Paternoster Row.
A good Heraldic Dictionary has long been a desiratirn among heraldic and
genealogical students, and Mr. Elvin's handsome volume is intended to
supply the need. The work is evidently the result of extensive reading,
studious care, and ungrudging expense.
Mr. Elvin has divided his subject unto two sections. The first contains
forty-six plates of engravings, illustrating the numerous technical terms used
in the science of heraldry, given, concisely, on the pages opposite to the
several plates ; and the second is a very full alphabetical dictionary of
terms, referring again to the examples in the Plates above mentioned. This
dictionary contains special terms of ordinaries and charges not usually found
in practical heraldry. It also affords much useful information concerning the
insignia of several orders of knighthood, and other heraldic subjects. It
would appear to be in every respect complete and sufficient, and confers the
greatest credit on Mr. Elvin's industry and perseverance. The numerous
illustrations arc beautifully engraved.
Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications. 1S5
THE ANTIQUARY : A Magazine devoted to the Study of the Past,
Vol. XX., July to December, 18S9. London : Elliot Stock, 62, Paternoster
Row, 1889.
Mr. Elliot Stock has recently issued the twentieth volume of this valuable
periodical. It contains many Papers of much interest. Among them is a
series of articles by W. Rendle, F.R.C.S., on the " Records of St. Thomas's
Hospital." This Hospital was built in 1228, but having fallen into a state
of dilapidation it was rebuilt in the early part of the 16th century at a cost,
in our money, of about £3000, and it is curious to observe that the money
was raised, then as now, by subscription. The records give us many glimpses
of the social condition, and the manners and habits, of the people in the 16th
and 17th centuries ; and also of the state of medical and surgical skill at that
period. There is also an article on the Manor House of Asshton (co. Lane.)
the ancient seat of the Asshton family, and afterwards, by marriage, of the
Booths, of Dunham Massie, by E. W. Cox. We notice that Mr. Cox has
made ca slip in stating that Sir George Booth after the Restoration was
created Earl of Delamere. There never was an Earl of Delamere. His
dignity was only a Barony, but his son, the second Baron, was created Earl
of "Warrington in 1690. We are very sorry to learn that this ancient and
curious building, now one of the seats of the Earl of Stamford, is in danger
of destruction from the grasping covetousness and competition of rival rail-
way companies. Mr. Sparvel-Bayley, E.S.A., gives us some " Notes on a
historical MS. Metrical Poem of the loth century in the Rawlinson Collection
in the Bodleian Library, On Mutability of Fortune in the case of Eleanor
Cobham, Duchess of Gloucester, sometime wife of Humphrey, Duke of
Gloucester, grandson of King of Edward III., called "the good Duke
Humphrey. " Another instance is alluded to in the poem in the mysterious
sudden death of John Beaufort, Duke of Somerset, son of John Beaufort,
eldest son of John of Gaunt, and another grandson of King Edward III.
We should also mention a Paper of much interest entitled "A' Sek: an
Opening from the River Karun to Central Persia," by that veteran traveller
and archaeologist, W. F. Ainsworth, Ph. Dr., F.S.A., F.R.G.S., &c, and
many other communications well deserving of notice, whilst the monthly
publication of the " Antiquaries' Note Book and Antiquarian News " form
a collection of items of archaeological information not to be found elsewhere.
This volume closes the first series of the work, and a new series was
commenced on the 1st of January under a different Editor, the numbers of
which that have been issued shew no falling oft' in the literary character of
the Periodical.
YORKSHIRE CHAP-BOOKS, Edited by Charles A. Federer, L.C.P.
First Series, comprising Thomas Gent's Tracts on Legendary Subjects ; a
Memoir of the Author, and a select number of Facsimile Reproductions of
the Original Woodcuts. London : Elliot Stock, 1889.
YORKSHIRE LEGEMDS AND TRADITIONS, as told by her Ancient
Chroniclers, Her Poets, and Journalists. By the Rev. Thomas Parkinson,
F. R. Hist. S. Member of the Surtees' Society, The Yorkshire Archaological
and Topographical Association, Vicar of South Otterington. [Second Series. ]
London : Elliot Stock, 1889.
1S6 Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications.
The introduction to the first of these volumes forms a very brief but inter-
esting Essay on Chap-Book literature, which in days gone by formed an
important branch of literary business, and possessed great influence on the
lives and characters of the middle and lower classes of the population. Prior
to the present century books were not only still comparatively scarce and
costly but not easily obtained in remote rural districts. Moreover, readers
of works which required any sustained thought were still more rare. The
literature, therefore, which came into the hands and suited the mental
capacity of the simple folk we have mentioned were short tales of Adven-
ture ; The Lives of Bold Highwaymen ; Ballads, historical and amusing ;
Romantic Stories in ballad form ; Tales and Legends, moral and religious ;
Broadsides, &c, &c. , which were sold by Chap-men at markets and fairs
and were hawked about from house to house. These formed the current
literature of the people, and had a very large sale, and though some of them
in these days may be considered coarse, they were superior to the trashy
novels which now flood the press and pollute the minds of the young of all
classes.
Thomas Gent, the author and printer of all the pieces in this volume, was
pre-eminent among the purveyors of this kind of literature. A sketch of his
life is given, derived from his autobiography, shewing its vicissitudes, his poverty,
hardships, perseverance, toil, irrasibility, love, marriage, misfortunes and
death. The memoir possesses much interest, and exhibits the progress which
has been made in literature since the first quarter of the last century. We are
told incidentally that in 1715 there was but one printer in Liverpool, and that
in 17-2 Gent's printing business in York was practically a monopoly, for no
other printer could be found in the whole of Yorkshire and Durham.
Gent was evidently a self-educated man, but he was able and industrious.
His reading and researches were most extensive. The late Mr. Joseph
Hunter, F.S.A., the author of the History of Hallamshire and many other
works, says that " Gent's performances were not like too many modern books
of topography, mere bundles of pillage from the works of ingenious and pains-
taking authors, but contained matter honestly collected, and not before his
time made public by the press," and the Editor of the present volume says
he has "verified some hundreds of Gent's references to works of most varied
description and found every one of them strictly accurate." He was the
author of many works historical and other. Those printed in this volume,
especially his Legend of St. Winifred in simple verse, is very interesting and
well adapted to its purpose. The volume is printed upon rough hand-made
paper, with titles and the quaint illustrations in facsimile, and is got up,
generally, in Mr. Stock's tasteful style.
The second volume at the head of this notice seems to fall under the
designation of Folk-lore as it treats of the Legends and Traditions of York-
shire. This important subject has received great attention from antiquaries
during the last few years. It seems but a short time ago, though it extends
to fifteen years, that a suggestion appeared in that most useful publication
"Notes and Queries, that a Special Society should be formed to collect,
arrange, and print all scattered bits of legend, popular mythology, super-
stitions, local traditions, customs, rhymes and proverbs, not only in this
country but elsewhere, of which those in the volumes before us are types.
Ancient customs and superstitions, from various causes obvious to all, are
Notices of Recent Akch.eological Publications. 187
fast dying out, and this effort was commenced not a day too soon. We are
glad to add that the suggestion was very warmly received by many gentle-
men of great and varied learning, and led to the formation of what is now a
strong .Society ; and it is with much satisfaction we hail Mr. Parkin's
interesting volume as a contribution to the object in view.
Many of the legends and traditions are most interesting and others
amusing, and all are very pleasingly related, and though, at least in sub-
stance, some are told elsewhere in distant localities we do not complain, for
it tends to shew the cosmopolitan character of many traditions, customs and
superstitions ; and the system adopted of classification under different heads
renders easier the means of comparison and of shewing the area over which
the same customs and conditions extend.
TRANSACTIONS OF THE
Bristol <uto Gloucestershire <3lrclt<rologiatl §ocictg
IN 1889-90.
At the Sicmmer Meeting held at Cheltenham on the 16th, 17th,
and 18th July, 1889.
This Society held its 14th Annual Meeeting at Cheltenham, on Tuesday, the
16th July, and two following days. The Society was formally received by the
Mayor (Col. Thoyts) and the members of the Local Committee, by whom the
arrangements had been made, in the Council Chamber at 11 a.m., and the
opening Meeting was held immediately afterwards. There was a very large
attendance of members and associates. Among those present were Mr.
R.V.Vassar-S.mith (the President of the Society), Sir Brook Kay, Bart, (the
President of the Council), Mr. A T. Agg-Gardiner, M.P. (tie President, elect),
General Pearce, Major-General Babbage, Col. Forbes, Dr. Cook, Dr. W.
Davis ; the Revs. F. E. Warren, J. Lockhead, S. E. Bartleet, and the
Messrs. B. Bonnor, J. Crcdas, E. A. D'Argent, F. Dobell, A. E. Hudd,
A Le Blanc, W. George, Win. Leigh, V. P., J. Mills, H. P. Prankerd,
F. de Saumarez, S. H. Swayne, A. J. Skinner ; Rev. W. Bazeley (Hon.
Gen. Secretary) ; Mr. G. B.Witts (Hon. Local Secretary), Mr. E.Wethered
(Hon. Local Treasurer), and many ladies.
The Mayor heartily welcomed the Society to Cheltenham on this its
second visit, the former visit, he remarked, having taken place some ten
years ago. He was afraid there were not many objects of archaeological
interest in the town, but the neighbourhood teemed with antiquarian re-
mains and relics, in the inspection of which he hoped the members would
find much of interest. His Worship made a feeling allusion to the loss the
town had sustained in the death of Dr. Day, and also referred to Dr. Day's
high scientific attainments, especially in that branch of natural history which
was his favourite study, viz., pisiculture. Cheltenham had felt honoured in
having as a resident for the last few years of his life one who had so greatly
distinguished himself in the world of science.
The President thanked the Mayor for the kind manner in which the
the Society had been welcomed, and also for the feeling and sympathetic
way in which his Worship had alluded to the loss ot one of its most distin-
guished members.
The chair was then taken by Mr. Vassar-Smith, who called upon the
Hon. Secretary to read the
REPORT OF COUNCIL FOR 1SS8-9.
The Council submits to the members of the Bristol and Gloucestershire
Arclneological Society the Fourteenth Annual Report.
There are at present .396 annual members, 75 life members and 3 honor-
ary members on the Society's list, making a total of 474 members. The
total number last year was 466.
Vol. XIV. o
190 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
The income for the financial year 1888-9 was £294 8s. 5d. The expen-
diture amounted to £293 5s. 9d. The actual balance at the Society's bankers
on the 21st April, 18S9, was £264 13s. lOd ; besides this there was a sum of
£77 15s. lid. due from the Berkeley MS. fund ; and the Society has, more-
over, a funded capital of £432 3s. 8d. in the new 2| Consolidated Stock,
representing the composition fees of Life Members.
The Council has issued during the last year the second part of Vol. XII.
and the first part of Vol. XIII. of the Society's Transactions, and also the
second part of "An Analysis of the Domesday Survey of Gloucestershire,"
by the Rev. C. S. Taylor. The third and concluding part of this " Analysis "
will be issued shortly with the second part of Vol. XIII. The Council
desires to express its acknowledgement to those who have very kindly con-
tributed to the expense of illustrating the Transactions.
The Society has held two General Meetings during the last year — at
Gloucester on the 16th, 17th, 18th and 19th of July, 1888, and at Berkeley
on the 29th of May, 1889.
The Annual Summer Meeting at Gloucester, the second held in that
city, after an interval of twelve years, was most successfully arranged and
carried out by an influential local committee. The thanks of the Society
are due to that committee, and especially to Mr. G. S. Blakeway, who, at a
time of great domestic anxiety, spared neither time nor labour in fulfilling
his arduous duties as Local Secretary. They are also due to Mr. W. H.
Stevenson, of the Royal Commission upon Historical MSS., who, having
spent many weeks in arranging and calendaring the Gloucester City Char-
ters for the Corporation, attended the Gloucester Meeting, and gave much
valuable information to the members concerning the various deeds exhibited
at the Local Museum ; to Mr. John Bellows, for his interesting address on
Roman Gloucester ; and to Mr. St. John Hope, Assistant Secretary to the
Society of Antiquaries, who read a paper on The Seals of the City of Gloucester.
The Dean of Gloucester very courteously received the members at the
Cathedral, and, with the assistance of Mr. F. W. Waller and the Rev. W.
Bazeley, pointed out the more interesting features of that ancient structure.
After the conclusion of the meeting, visits were organized of the working
classes of Gloucester to the Cathedral, and a large public gathering at the
Shire Hall listened, apparently with much interest, to popular papers on
local history and antiquities read by Mrs. Baguall-Oakeley, the Dean of
Gloucester, Mr. J. Bellows, Mr. F. W. Waller, and the General Secretary
of this Society.
The Annual Spring Meeting was held at Berkeley on the 29th of May,
and more than a hundred members visited the Parish Church, under the
guidance of the vicar, the Rev. J. Lett Stackhouse, and Berkeley Castle,
under the guidance of the Rev. W. Bazeley.
It is unnecessary to give further details of these meetings in this Report
as a full account of the Gloucester Meeting appears in Part 1 of Vol. XIII.
of the Society's Transactions ; and the Berkeley Meeting will be described
in Vol. XIV., part 1.
Besides these General Meetings, a Local Meeting was held at Stroud, on
the 21st of February, 1889, to which all the members of the Society were
invited. The arrangements were admirably made by the Local Secretary,
Report of Council. 191
Mr. E. Witchell, and the rest of the Local Committee. A very interesting
address was given by the Dean of Gloucester, and papers were read by Mr.
Charles Wethered and Mr. Arthur Playne. Mr. Embrey, of the Gloucester
School of Science, very kindly attended the Meeting and illustrated the
lectures with photographs shewn by the magic lantern. There was a crowd-
ed audience, and much interest was created throughout the neighbourhood
of Stroud in the Society's work. The Council hopes that similar meetings
will be held elsewhere during the forthcoming winter.
The Council having learned from Col. Forbes, the Local Secretary for
Dursley, that the Uley Tumulus, better known as Hetty Pegler's Tump,
which has been placed under the charge of H.M.'s Commissioners of Works,
was being injured by careless or mischievous persons, appointed a committee
to enquire into and report upon the state of this ancient monument. The
report so made to the Council was forwarded to Lieut. -General Pitt-Rivers,
who thereupon paid a personal visit to Uley and examined the Barrow. The
Council has since been asked to submit to the Board of Works a plan and
estimate for its restoration.
Additions have been made to the Society's library during the last year
by donations from the Rev. B. H. Blacker, Mr. Drayton Wyatt and other
members ; and also by the purchase of books and tracts, relating for the
most part to Gloucestershire, at the sales of Mr. Wilton's and Mr. Jeffs
libraries.
The Council has arranged exchange of Transactions with the Cambrian
Archaeological Society, the Society of Antiquaries of Newcastle-upon-Tyne,
The Royal Historical and Archaeological Association of Ireland, and the
Suffolk Institute of Archaeology and Natural History.
Some difficulty has arisen with regard to the storage of the Society's
books and surplus copies of Transactions, &c, &c.,the space allotted for
book-cases in the Gloucester Museum being necessarily very small. The
Council learns with satisfaction that new buildings in connection with the
Museum, the School of Art and the School of Science, are likely to be
erected in the vacant site adjoining the present buildings, and hopes that a
more convenient room may thus be procured for the Society's library.
A list of the books and pamphlets belonging to the Society has been
prepared, and rules for their issue to members have been drawn up by a
committee, aud accepted by the Council. This list and these rules will be
printed and sent to the members.
The work of this Society, and of similar Societies in other counties, has
hitherto been carried on without reference to any central body. It has been
proposed during the last year that there shall be a union of Archaeological
Societies in England (with the Society of Antiquaries of London as a nucleus);
that delegates shall be appointed by each Society, who shall from time to
time confer together at the rooms of the Society of Antiquaries, Burlington
House, with a view to the better organization of antiquarian research and
the preservation of ancient monuments. The Council has had much pleasure
in complying with this proposal, and has appointed Sir Henry Barkly,
K.C.B., G.C.M.G., and Sir John Maclean, F.S.A, the delegates of this
Society. The first Congress will be held to-morrow (July 17th) at Burlington
House.
O 2
192 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
Reference was made in the last report to the exploration of a Roman
villa at Tockington Park. The interesting notices which have appeared in
the 12th and 13th volumes of the Transactions will have informed the mem-
bers of the discoveries which have been made. Sir John Maclean has
devoted much time and thought to directing and recording the excavations,
and the thanks of the Society are due to him, as also to Mr. F. Judge for
his excellent drawings of pavements and other objects of interest discovered,
and to Mr. Richard Smith, the occupant of the farm, for the facilities given
by him for research. The receipts for the Exploration Fund were : —sub-
scriptions, £53, profits of Tockington Park Special Meeting, £7 0s. 2d. —
Total, £60 0s. 2d. Of this sum, £46 15s. 4d. has been expended in opening
and preserving the villa, leaving a balance of £13 4s. lOd. , which will partly
defray the cost of illustrating Sir John Maclean's notices of the villa in the
Society's Transactions.
The Council has noticed with pleasure the announcement of two im-
portant publications in connection with the City of Gloucester : — " The
Calendar of the Records of the Corporation " and " The Rental of all the
Houses in Gloucester, A.o. 1455," edited by Mr. W. H. Stevenson and the
Secretary of this Society.
The Council has also been informed that two members of this Society,
the Rev. W. Bazeley and Mr. Hyett, have been for some time engaged in
the preparation of a manual of Gloucestershire Bibliography, in which they
have made considerable progress. It is to be desired that all who possess
rare books and tracts, relating to this subject, will assist in the work by
communicating with these gentlemen.
The Council has again to deplore the loss of several members by death : —
T. Gambler Parry, Esq., President of the Society in 1S79, when the annual
meeting was held, as this year, at Cheltenham, and a Vice-President from
the time of the formation of the Society until his death, was distinguished
for brilliant genius, profound knowledge of the History of Art, and uniform
courtesy. The frescoes which he executed at Ely, Gloucester and Highnam,
will be abiding memorials of his piety and skill. Mr. Wm. Brown Clegram,
of Saal Lodge ; the Rev. H. T. Price, Rector of Elkstone ; and Dr. Disney
Launder Thorp, of Lypiatt Lodge, Cheltenham, were donors to the Society's
library, and Mr. J. 0. Halliwell-Phillipps had a world-wide reputation as a
Shakesperian Antiquary. Dr. Day, who has just passed away, was distin-
guished rather as a Scientist than as an Archaeologist ; but this Society owes
him a debt of gratitude for the assistance he rendered to the Council as a
member of that body.
The Council now nominates for re-election the President of Council,
the Vice-Presidents of the Society, the General Secretary, the General
Treasurer, and the Secretaries Local and Sectional. The Council also
nominates Mr. Vassar-Smith, the President for 1888-9, Vice-President of
the Society in the room of the late Mr. Gambier Parry. Local Secretaries
are needed for Fairford, Cirencester, Newent, Winchcombe, Chipping Camp-
den and Thornbury.
The following members of Council retire by rotation, but are eligible
for re-election :— Major C. H. Fisher, and Messrs. A. E. Hudd, R. T. Martin,
S. H. Swayne, P. Prankerd, T. S. Pope, C. Bowley and H. W. Bruton.
Report of Council. 193
The Council has held five meetings during the last year -two at Bristol,
two at Gloucester, and one at Cheltenham, and desires to express its thanks
to the Mayor and Town Clerk of Gloucester, and to the Mayor and Town
Clerk of Cheltenham, for their courteous permission to meet in the Council
Chambers of Gloucester and Cheltenham respectively.
Dr. Cook proposed and Mr. Dobell seconded the adoption of the report,
which was at once agreed to.
Mr. B. Bonnor proposed the re-election of the following members of the
Council -.—Major Fisher, Messrs. E. A. Hudd, R. T. Martin, S. H. Swayne,
H. P. Prankerd, T. S. Pope, C. Bowley, and H. W. Bruton
This was seconded and carried.
Mr. Leigh proposed a vote of thanks to the retiring President for the
courteous manner in which he had fulfilled his office during the year, and
remarked that the success of the Gloucester and Berkeley Meetings was very
much due to Mr. Vassar-Smith's presence and help. He also referred to the
fact that at Gloucester last year, for the first time in the history of the
Society, a popular meeting was held in connection with the visit of the
Societ}', and urged that similar meetings should be arranged in future, in
order that the humbler classes might be excited to take an interest in the
history and antiquities of the country and in the preservation of works
of art and architecture.
Mr. Swayne seconded the motion, which was heartily adopted.
In acknowledgement, Mr. Vassar-Smith said he had carried out the
duties of his office to the best of his ability, and he trusted that the arrange-
ments from time to time made had worked smoothly and with advantage to
the Society. He had learnt something of archaeology during his term of
office, and trusted that he should go on acquiring knowledge, so that in the
future he might be of some assistance to the Society. He joined with Mr.
Leigh in urging that popular meetings should be held in connection with
the Society's annual meeting, and, concluding, bespoke for Mr. Agg-Gardner
a cordial welcome on his entering on the office of President for the ensuing
year.
Mr. Agg-Gardner then took the chair and delivered as follows his
INAUGURAL ADDRESS.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
When Sir Brook Kay, writing on behalf of your Society, honoured me with
an invitation to act as the President of this meeting, I was at first unwilling
to accept the proffered compliment. I observed, on referring to the records
of your proceedings, that this post had almost invariably been held by some
gentleman who was more or less identified with scientific research, and
I felt that my deficiency in this branch of learning would form a fatal bar to
the adequate discharge of those duties which you assign to your President.
But Sir Brook Kay and the members of his committee with whom I con-
ferred, impressed upon me that as established custom called for a Cheltenham
194 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
President, and the time wherein to discover one, if I failed them, was ex-
tremely limited, local considerations became more urgent than those of
learning ; and moreover that formidable as might appear to be the wisdom
of the Society, this wisdom was balanced and controlled by infinite gener-
osity. Penetrated by this reasoning, and relying on the benevolent assurances
I have mentioned, I consented to succeed Mr. Vassar-Smith. And I there-
fore now appear before you fully conscious alike of my inability to add
anything to the stock of your information, and of an absolute necessity for
making a serious inroad on the stores of your indulgence.
The first duty of the President is to deliver his address, and the first
difficulty that confronts him in the discharge of this duty is to decide on
which of the many channels of thought into which the study of Archaeology
leads us, is to be selected. A kind friend, anticipating my perplexity, sug-
gested to me that as I was identified with the Manor of Cheltenham, and
had access to the deeds, I might find among some of its recondite rolls
abundant material for an interesting if not an instructive essay. But I was
at once met with the diffiulty that the most ancient and presumably there-
fore the most interesting of the documents were written in Norman French.
This would entail the services of an interpreter to unravel, and unhappily
the desired interpreter is not to be found. Therefore I am afraid, so far as
I am concerned at least, whatever of interest is to found in these parch-
ments must remain in their present musty obscurity. To some it might
appear that the neighbourhood of Cheltenham, strewn as it is with so
much that is of antiquarian value, would supply on the present occasion the
proper text for an address. But here again a manifest objection presents
itself. Only a few years have elapsed since Cheltenham was last made the
site of the Society's meeting. At that meeting the archaeology of the district
was examined and explained, not only by several members of the Society,
but by the President of the day — the late Mr. Gambier Parry. Those who
knew that accomplished gentleman are well aware how thoroughly he com-
pleted whatever he undertook. His brilliant and exhaustive address is
conspicuous on the pages of your records, and the eloquent language in
which it was clothed lingers still, I doubt not, in the memories of many
whom I have the honour to address to-day. It would be obviously in the
nature of an anti-climax, if not of an impertinence, were I to attempt to
re-tell his well-told tale. It is, of course, possible that some crumbs of
information were left, or may have fallen since, that might be collected and
formed by a skillful brain into the materials for a useful if not an ambitious
address. But this is a task too high for me, and can well be left to those
students of antiquity of whom this Society happily can boast a strong con-
tingent, and to whom we shall look for valuable criticisms and interesting
papers in the course of our expeditions. For myself, as an amateur addressing
experts, it will be better if during the few minutes in which I am allowed
Inaugural Address. 195
to detain you I take a general rather than a particular view, and glance
briefly at the results of researches that have been recently accomplished,
rather than to speculate as to where fresh discoveries might be attempted,
or endeavour to unfold new theories or to combat accepted creeds.
I presume I am right in supposing that, amongst the numerous votaries
of antiquity, while some are animated by motives of cimosity, others by a
pedantic passion for what is old, they are inspired by the purest zeal who
seek by the aid of its science to perfect their knowledge of the lives, the
habits, and the history of mankind. Homo sum, humani nihil a me alienum
puto is the motto which the great — perhaps the greatest — living authority on
archaeology, Sir Charles Newton, has assigned to the archaeologist. To
collect, he says, the implements, weapons, pottery, costumes and furniture
of races is to contribute materials not only to the history of mining, metal-
ling, spinning, weaving, dying, carpentry, and the like arts, which minister
to civilization, but also to illustrate the physical history of the countries
where these arts are practised. And wherever man has left the stamp of
mind on brute matter, whether we designate his work as structure, texture,
or mixture, mechanical or chymical ; whether the result be a house, a ship,
a garment, a piece of glass, or a metallic implement, these memorials of
economy and invention will always be worthy the attention of the archae-
ologist. It may not, perhaps, be altogether alien to these sentiments if I
refer to some of the recent discoveries which have been made in the East,
and which add to, and, particularly where it is derived from sacred sources,
confirm our historical knowledge.
In Egypt, through the action of the Exploration Fund and the activity
of Mr.Naville, a flood of light has been thrown on the sojourn and the exodus
of the Israelites. The route of the exodus has been determined, and the
passage across the Red Sea all but marked out. It is now made certain that
Rameses II. was the Pharaoh of the oppression, and his son, Menepthah,
the Pharaoh of the exodus ; and that the period of their reigns covered 70
years, from the commencement of the great oppression to the exodus, as
stated in biblical history. At the beginning of this time, Rameses founded
the two store cities of Python and Rameses — one has been discovered with
its store chambers built of unbaked brick, and with monuments of the reign
of Rameses and other monarchs downwards from him.
It was during these excavations that the French Commission discovered
the Royal mummies at Thebes, collected for security about Solomon's time,
and which represented the principal sovereigns of the previous 7 centuries.
These have been unrolled, and we are now, therefore, made familiar with
the features of Rameses II. The mummies are in the Boulak Museum, but
a photograph is to be seen in the British Museum, which shows that
Rameses II. at the age of 90, still preserves, after 3000 years, the determined
190 Transactions for the Year 18S9-90.
expression which history leads us to imagine he must have worn in his life-
time, and which is emphasized, according to the dogma of physiognomists,
by that rare feature among Egyptians — a Wellingtonian nose. The Pharaoh
of the exodus has not yet been found, a fact which strengthens the belief of
those who assert that he was drowned in the Red Sea, though the Scriptural
expression " overthrown " may be taken to mean defeated as well as drowned.
There is therefore still a possibility of a fresh addition to the Boulak Museum.
Very great progress has been made with the interpretation of documents
historical, religious and legal, and now any trained student can construe
any Egyptian text on stone or papyrus, in whatever form of character it
may be inscribed.
There is one matter which may be of interest to those who desire to
extract the honey of political information from the dried relics of antiquity,
though it refers to a question of social rather than of party politics, now as
then — I mean the question of female rights. From the earliest period of
Egyptian history the wife was called the lady of the house, and was repre-
sented as the equal of her husband. Monogamy was, if not obligatory, all
but universal. There are very few tombs which mention more than one
wife. In the time to which legal documents belong, from B.C. 700 to the
Christian era, marriage settlements were carefully drawn. Those which are
extant are much more in favour of the wife than even those which the
champions of female rights have been able as yet to wring from the British
Legislature of to-day. Divorce was rendered difficult and distasteful to the
husband by the provision that in its event the husband paid the dowry with
interest from the date of marriage — sometimes at 33 per cent. He had to
resign all family rights to his eldest son, who became the head of the family ;
and the only condition that the unfortunate man could exact in his favour
was that he should be fed, and subsequently mummified. It is scarcely
surprising that bachelors in those days were, as I hope is the case in the
present, regarded as prudent, if not praiseworthy pillars of the State. I
should mention that the best early instance of a marriage settlement is a
draft of one inscribed on a dessert plate, and which is now in the Louvre.
The moral which may be drawn from the domestic incident which I have
related, if I may be forgiven for digressing into anything so dangerous, is
that if, notwithstanding these abnormal privileges which were granted to the
Egyptian ladies, the civilization of that country lasted from B.C. 3500 to 341
A.D., there is not much danger to be apprehended to our civilization from the
modified privileges which have been granted to the gentler sex of to-day.
Let me, however, pass on from Egypt to Chaldean and Assyrian researches.
These, since the discovery of Rawlinson, of the reading of the Assyrian
characters have moved on with the same rapidity as the Egyptian. Their
bearing on Biblical history have been even more direct than that of the
Egyptian. For we find authentic records of the relation between the
IXAFOTTRAL ADDRESS. 197
Hebrew kingdoms and the Assyrian from the time of Ahab to that of
Manasseh, the son of Hezekiah.
The British Museum contains the record of a great battle fought between
Ahab and the younger Ben Hadad of Syria on one side, and Shalmanezer II.
of Assyria on the other hand. We also have the capture of Lachish by
Sennacherib, and the annals of Sennacherib giving a glowing account of his
wars with Hezekiah, and omitting all notice of his disaster before Jerusalem.
This, however, may, as the newspapers describe it, be read " between the
lines." Besides the historical sculptures and manuscripts, the British Museum
contains enough of the library of Nineveh — which, by the way, was arranged
and administered very much like the British Museum of the present day —
to fill, if translated, some 300 octavo volumes. They are written on clay
tablets, like cakes of soap. Amongst them, the most curious, is the Deluge
tablet. This is the Babylonian tradition of the Deluge, similar to the
Hebrew record in its general outline, and curiously illustrating it, as in the
case of the raven, which did not return to the ark, because as he is described
in the Babylonian tradition as feeding on the bodies of the drowned.
In reference to the Jewish Antiquities, the most important discovery in
Palestine of late years has been that of the Moabite stone, which was made
twenty years ago. It is the tablet of Meslia, King of Moab, contemporary
with Omroy, Ahab, and his two sons. It is written in primitive Hebrew
characters in the dialect of Hebrew resembling that of the Book of Kings.
More recently an inscription was traced at the Pool of Siloam at Jerusalem,
which had been engraved under either Solomon or Hezekiah. The inscrip-
tion states that the engineers, who had dug a tunnel of about 2,000 feet in
length to enable the water to enter the pool, met, like those engaged in
piercing Mount Cenis in recent years, with absolute accuracy from either
side. Xo doubt these engineers were Phrenicians, who were the scientists
of those days. Numerous records and remains of course still remain to be
found, but the ground is jealously watched by the Turks, who have shown
themselves very jealous of late, but who made one important concession to
antiquarian science by establishing as curator of the Museum at Stamboul
a German gentleman of considerable energy and experience,
The subject of Classical Antiquities is too large for the limits of this
address. But I may draw passing attention to the recent important discoveries
of Dr.Schliemann. (1) Those of the early cities in the plains of Troy, existing
B.C. 120O. (2) The discovery of an entombment in Mycenae about 1200 B.r.
also where Agamemnon and his comrades were buried. These were the
remains of warriors in golden armour, whose faces were covered with golden
masks on which features are still traceable. And these, from the art of the
armour and of the objects entombed with the heroes, point unmistakeably to
the fact that they belong to the period of the Trojan war. (3) The dis-
198 Transactions for thk Year 1889-90.
co very at Tiryus of a primitive Greek palace, like the house of Ulysses in
the Odyssey, and of the site of the ancient temple of Aphrodite in Kythera
(Cerigo).
In addition to these, German explorations at Olympia have resulted in
the recovery of some of the finest works of sculpture, and of the most
interesting inscriptions that adorned the seat of the great Greek games,
while in the neighbourhood of Athens itself, amongst the principal of recent
topographical discoveries may be mentioned (1) the walls of the old house of
Erectheus, and (2) of the foundations of the temple of Roma and Augustus.
With regard to the latter, though the existence had long been known,
its exact position has only been definitely fixed by the light of recent dis-
coveries. It stood on a platform of Pireian stone, 400 feet east of the
Parthenon. It was a circular building, surrounded by a colonnade of nine
Ionic pillars. Some interesting excavations have also been made by the
British School of Archaeology in Athens. The school, which owes its creation
in no small degree to the energy of that eminent man of letters, Sir Charles
Newton, to whom I have already referred, but whose valuable services (to
mankind) can never be adequately acknowledged, was formally opened three
or four years ago. Its building is now installed in the slopes of Mount
Hymettus, from whence it commands a wide expanse of scenery, rich in
historic incident. The report of the last year's work, which has just been
issued, tells of the excavations in Cyprus, in connection with the Cyprus
Exploration Fund, and of the discovery of the supposed site of Arsinoe and
Limniti ; of the finding of Cypriote inscriptions and of artistic objects in
pottery and terra-cotta ; and also of a successful series of experiments at
the school itself. But unfortunately the managers of the school have found
that even in the violet-crowned city the question of the res augusta domi
will assert itself, a misfortune all the more mortifying to the Phil-Hellenic
Englishman, when he observes that it is one which the rival schools of
poorer nations have been able to defy.
There are other branches of Greek archaeology that call for, and I make
no doubt have received, your notice, such as sculpture, inscriptions, numis-
matics. On the latter interesting study Sir Charles Newton mentions a
valuable addition contributed by Mr. R. Stuart Poole, of the British Museum,
a gentlemen, the extent of whose learning is rivalled by that of his kindly
courtesy. But neither your time nor your patience would, I fear, allow me to
attempt to develope any fresh matter. I leave this duty to those experienced
savants who are to follow me. I have already run rapidly over a sufficient num-
ber of instances that serve to show how directly the study of archaeology bears
upon those matters of history with which even the unlearned are acquainted
and concerned. Of course, these instances could be multiplied indefinitely,
and by a suitable authority no doubt a serious moral might be drawn and
seriously applied. Happily, however, it is no part of my duty to-day to
Inaugural Address. 199
point a moral or even to adorn a tale. My function is, if I may be pardoned a
simile that sounds somewhat of the kitchen, to provide the hors d'osuvres for
the banquet that is to follow. I own I look forward with pleasure to the visits
we are to pay to the many places of interest to which we have been kindly
invited, to the papers that will be read, and to the criticisms that will follow.
I have no doubt that with our skilled and sagacious secretaries, Mr. Bazeley
and Mr. AYitts, to guide us, we shall accomplish an agreeable and successful
meeting. And I trust that as a reward for their labours these gentlemen
may find that they have kindled a fire of archseologic enthusiasm in Glouces-
tershire that will never be allowed to slumber or to sleep. Throughout the
country generally, I am told, the evidence of numbers declares that the
interest which is being taken in the puruit of archaeology is an ever widening
circle. That this should be so is scarcely a matter for surprise, as a study
which brings before the student all the important links and lights of history
from " the wide grey lampless depths "' of time to the present hour is well
attuned to the spirit of the age in which we live.
A philosopher, well known now also as a politician, has told us that
since the beginning of the present century the critics of life are apt to pitch
their criticisms in a high poetic key, and to say with Woodworth :
The human nature with which I felt
That I belonged and reverenced with love.
Was not a persistent presence, but a spirit
Diffused through time and space, with aid derived
Of evidence from monuments, erect,
Prostrate, or leaning towards the common rest
On earth, the widely-scattered wreck sublime
Of vanished nations.
For those who share the poet's sentiment, what science can be more sym-
pathetic than that which finds the text of its teaching alike in the song of
the peasant, in the myths and legends of faded superstitions, in the cere-
monies and customs of varied races, in the Pyramids, in the Parthenon, and
in the " piled up arches of the Coliseum ?"
And such is the wide field that is offered to the student of archteology,
in which he is free to find the germ of his reflections and the food of his
philosophy. Amongst those who are here to-day there are, I daresay, others
besides myself who can scarcely claim the title of the archaeologist. But by
our presence, and by our membership, we wish to express our loyalty to the
cause which the Society exists to further and to advance ; remembering, if
I may be allowed in my last words to quote again from Sir Charles Newton,
that archreology is "a chain of continuous tradition which connects the
civilised nineteenth century with the races of the primeval world — which
holds together this great brotherhood in bonds of attachment more enduring
than the ties of national consanguinity, moi'e enobling even than the recol-
lections of ancestral glory — which, traversing the ruins of empires, unmoved
by the shock of revolutions, spans the abyss of time, and transmits onward
the message of the Past."
200 Transactions for the Year 1S89-90.
Sir Brook Kay proposed a hearty vote of thanks to Mr. Agg-Gardner
for undertaking the office of President for the coming year. He said it was
extremely kind and generous of him to accede to the wishes of the Society
in this respect, notwithstanding the many calls on his time.
Mr. Le Blanc seconded the motion, which was carried by acclamation.
Mr. Agg-Gardner, in responding, joined in the expressions of regret
which had already been made at the loss the town had sustained in the death
of so cultured a citizen as Dr. Day, and also expressed his personal regret
that owing to illness Sir John Maclean was unable to be with them, or to
stay at his (Mr. Agg-Gardner's) house during the Meeting of the Society in
Cheltenham.
This ended the proceedings at the Council Chamber.
Excursion to Swindon, Stoke Orchard, Tredington and Boddington.
After lunch at the Plough Hotel, a large party, numbering about ninety,
took their places in the waggonettes provided for them, and, precisely at two
o'clock, the time appointed, started for the purpose of inspecting the archaeo-
logical features of Swindon, Stoke Orchard, Tredington and Boddington.
The first place visited was the
Church of Swindon.
The Members were met at the porch by the Rector, the Rev. Gilbert Day,
and, all being assembled within the walls of the church, Mr. Bazeley sug-
gested that Mr. Day would be good enough to describe the edifice, but he
had nothing further to communicate than that it had been either all or in
part rebuilt. Mr. Bazeley thereupon, in the unavoidable absence of Prof.
Middleton, who was expected to describe the group of churches in this day's
programme, was good enough to read some notes on these churches written
by the late Rev. J. L. Petit, a very high authority on Architecture and
Ecclesiology, and not of less interest in that they were written nearly
forty -live years ago.1 Mr. Petit describes the Church of Swindon as having
been then "partly rebuilt," "but," he adds, "it still retains its curious
Norman western tower, of an hexagonal form. The only other instance
of this kind with which I am acquainted is at Ozleworth, also in this
county ; of which I therefore send a sketch {Plate XVI.), though it is not
strictly within the limits of which I proposed to keep in my excursions.
Ozleworth Church has an hexagonal tower between the nave and chancel.
It must be of late Norman, as the western arch supporting it is pointed
and of a decidedly Early English character. This is much enriched by a
kind of ornament which might have been suggested by the variety of ways
in which the chevron is laid upon the architrave in late Norman, and of
which we have noticed examples. It consists of a bold open work of cylin-
ders forming angles with each other, as in the Norman chevron, but of
different inclinations, and in different planes ; several examples are to be
found in transitional building."
1 His Notes are printed in the Archaeological Journal for 1847, p. 97 et seq.
>
H
Stoke Orchard Church. 201
Mr. BAZELEY.from Fosbrook (Vol.11., p. 372), read the following particulars
of the later devolution of the Manor of Swindon. He said it long continued
in the Priory of St. Oswald until the dissolution of the monasteries, when it
passed into lay hands. The Cliffords of Frampton, the Trotmans, and the
Ashmeads, were successive owners, and it then passed to the Sturmys. Mr.
John Sturmy was Lord of the Manor in 1700. John Stratford succeeded,
and left it to the Beales, who held it until recent times.
The President having thanked the Rector for his courtesy to the Society,
the company rejoined the vehicles. A delightful drive brought the party to
Stoke Orchard Church.
Stoke Orchard is a chapelry of Bishop's Cleeve, and contained formerly two
manors, one here and the other in the Hundred of Tewkesbury. It was an-
ciently known as Stoke Archer, derived from a family of the name of Archer,
by whom it was held as early as the time of Rich. I., when Lettice, relict of
Robert Archer, gave the King four marks for having her Dowry near Cleeve
(1196), and in 7th Edward II. (1313-4) Richard, son and heir of Richard,
gave 40s. relief for lands held at Stokes in capite by petty serjeanty, viz.,
by the service of finding a man in time of war with bow and arrows for forty
days at his own expense. This we cite from Fosbroke, Vol. II., p. 356, who
gives further information respecting the devolution of the manor. It appears
from Kirbifs Quest that at that time (1284-1289) Nicholas le Archer held
part of Stoke by the service above described (vide Trans. Vol. XL, p. 142),
and it appears from the Return of Lay Subsidies, 3rd Henry IV. V/ tnat
Thomas Berkeley, of Coberlye, held lands and tenements at Stoke (Stoke
Archer), in the Hundred of Tewkesbury, by the same service (Ibid, p. 330).
On their arrival at the church the members were met by the Rev. B. F.
Hemming, the Rector of the parish, who gave them a cordial welcome. Mr.
Bazeley again had recourse to the valuable Notes of the late Rev. J. L. Petit
on this interesting church. Mr. Petit described the church as being in many
respects similar to the Chapel of Postlip, " though evidently of later date as
regards its Norman portions, whilst the parts which are added, or which had
been rebuilt, are of Early Perpendicular." We make no apology for giving
Mr, Petit's description verbatim, especially as we are able to give with it that
gentleman's admirable illustrations.
Mr. Petit writes : " The edifice consists of a nave and chancel, with a
belft-y over the chancel arch. The nave has a small round-headed window,
with a very deep splay ; the width of the window being only eight inches,
while that of the aperture on the internal face of the wall is 5ft. 7ins. It has
no west door, but a south one, very plain, at present square-headed, with a
semi-circular label. A north doorway is a little richer, having a round torus
in the jamb, but without any capital ; it has a label with a very concave
inner surface. The door has some good iron work. The other windows of
the nave, with the exception of the one inserted, are of the same description
with that at the west end, though somewhat smaller. The impost of the
chancel arch is that of a Norman arch of two orders, the lower one resting
on an engaged shaft, the section of whose base approaches to Early English,
as will be seen by comparing it with that of Postlip. The arch itself is
202
Transactions for the Year 18S9-90.
pointed, and of two chamfered orders, and I take it to belong to the same
period as the central belfry and chancel— early Perpendicular (fi<js. 9 cfc 10)
Fig. 9.
North Pier of Chancel Arch, Stoke
Orchard Church.
Fig. 10.
Base of North Pier of Stoke
Orchard Church.
To this date probably belongs also a buttress on the north side of the nave
and those supporting the chancel arch. The windows on the side of the
chancel are squaredieaded, though with arches and foliations to the lights ;
and the eastern window is a pointed one of two lights. The piscina occu-
pies the usual place in the south wall. The font is a fine cylindrical one
of Norman character, with an arcade of intersecting arches. The dimensions
of the building are as follow :— Breadth of nave internally 19 ft. 10 ins.,
length to western face of chancel arch 44 ft.
5 ins., depth of chancel arch 3 ft., span of
chancel arch 7 ft. 4 ins., breadth of chancel
12 ft. 9 ins., length of ditto to eastern face of
chancel arch 18 ft. 5 ins., thickness of side
walls of nave 2 ft. 7 ins, height of wall of
nave 12 ft. 8 ins., height of wall of chancel
to spring of gable 12ft. 3ins." Mr. Petit adds in
continuation : " We do not here observe the
proportion that appears in the last example
(Postlip). The building is altogether longer in
proportion to its breadth. But we must not
omit to notice the elegant, though simple, bell
turret over the chancel arch. The pyramidical
form given to its eastern elevation, as seen
from the north and south by similar slopes,
by which its thickness from east to west is
made to taper upwards. The arch is a round
one, somewhat depressed or segmental " (see
Jig. 11 and Plate X VII. )
These particulars having been given by the General Secretary, the Rev.
B. F. Heming addressed a few words to those present, drawing attention to
the pieces of mural decorations on the west wall which had recently been
discovered. They were inspected with much curiosity, and the suggestion
was thrown out that it might be well to take tracings of them. One of the
three figures brought to light is evidently that of Our Lord, but as to who
the others are intended to represent there is nothing to aid conjecture.
Fig. 11.
Bell Turret, Stoke Orchard Church.
X
|IV\\
■Ate ,18 ill!
Ji
11,1 "II
S'l.
1 .' TO
Mm
■'••'Mi
I !/'■///■' '.I ;J:|
Boddixgtox Maxor. 203
From the church the party proceeded to the manor-house, in the grounds
behind which the line of the old moat was clearly defined. From Stoke
Orchard the excursionists proceeded to the quaint old
Norman Church of Tredington.
Through some accident the Rev. G. E. Webster was not present to receive
them on their arrival, but came in soon afterwards. In the meantime the
Rev. W. Bazeley acted as guide and made some remarks on the building.
He was followed by the Rev. John Green, Mr. Webster's predecessor, who
had been for many years rector of the parish.
Mr. Grekn mentioned that the church was dedicated to St. John the
Baptist, and was one of the most interesting in the county of Gloucester. In
his subsequent remarks he said that : "The first object which attracts the
attention of visitors is the shaft of a lofty cross of the 14th century, standing
on the south side of the church. It is mounted on four steps, measuring,
respectively, 10ft., 8ft. 4ins., 6ft. 4ins., and 4ft. 9ins square. The shaft itself
is a slender tapering octagonal monolith, 12ft. 8 ins. in height. Three or four
drill-holes and a rough surface on the east face indicate the place where
either an escutcheon or small crucifix was attached.1
Upon a tomb facing the south porch, to the memory of one of the family
of Surman, 1687, is placed a slab, elaborately carved, and of a much earlier
date than the other portions, and which appears to have been the ancient
altar, as traces of the four crosses at the corners, and the small receptacle for
relics in the centre, are still traceable. The position of the ancient chapel
may be traced on the exterior of the north wall of the nave and adjoining
the ancient north doorway, and in the interior of the church by a window
of the sixteenth century.
There is a Sacrarmm, or niche, on the north side of the altar — "locus quo
res sacra reponunter." A direction for making such niche occurs in the 7th
of Archbishop Peckham's Constitutions at Reading, 1279.
There still remains on the north side of the chancel, but considerably
below the level of the present seat, a stone bench or long stone seat, sugges-
tive of the chancel having been built and used for a choir, a grange having
once existed in the parish in connection with the Monastery of Lanthony.
It has been thought by some, however, that the present chancel was the
original church.
The decayed transverse beam above the chancel arch, and in the nave,
indicates the position of the ancient rood. A portion of the cross is to be seen
at Tredington Court.
It remains only to notice the tympanum above the north doorway— this
north entrance is blocked up. Bloxam, in the first volume of his Gothic
Ecdcsiological Architecture, p. 130, describes one of similar construction at
Pedmore Church, Worcestershire, which has a rudely-sculptured figure of
our Saviour in the centre with his right arm upheld, while on either side are
two of the Evangelistic Symbols.
1 See Pooley's Crosses, p. 30.
204 Transactions for the Year 1SS9-90.
The ancient bell-cote at the west end of the church was superseded in
the beginning of last century by a wooden tower containing five bells pre-
sented by members of the Surman and Cartwright families, and cast by the
great bell-founders of that period, the Rudhalls, of Gloucester. The present
tower is the gift of the late John Surman, Esq. , who had a great affection
for the church and parish, and who laid out the churchyard and recast the
tenor bell during his lifetime.
The registers which contain several interesting entries are torn and
imperfect ; they are, no doubt, of the date 1538, when a Register of Bap-
tisms, Weddings and Burials was enjoined to be kept in every church.
The Register of Burials shews that the ravages of the Plague iu this
parish in the autumn of 1610 and spring of 1611 were very great.1
The chalice and paten are of the time of Elizabeth.
The company next proceeded to
BODDINGTON MANOR,
where they were very cordially received and hospitally entertained at after-
noon tea by Mr. and Mrs. Gibbons. Having partaken of tea, coffee, and
fruit and other refreshments, abundantly provided, they had the privilege of
inspecting Mr. Gibbons' valuable collection of Pictures, in which there are
some fine examples of the works of the best English and other masters.
Mr. Gibbons then read a Paper on Boddington Manor, in which he related
some traditions and incidents connected with the manor and house from the
time of King Alfred down to the great rebellion of the 17th century, and
mentioned some relics of the last mentioned period, which had been found
in the moat, and quoted some entries in the churchwardens' accounts.
The warm thanks of the Society having been given to Mr.and Mrs. Gibbons,
and an inspection made of the moat, the exterior of the old mansion and
other objects of interest, the party left Boddington for Cheltenham, well
satisfied with the day's excursion.
THE ANNUAL DINNER.
The Annual Dinner of the Society was held in the evening at the Plough
Hotel. The President in the chair. The only toast given was that of " The
Queen," and the company then adjourned for the
EVENING MEETING,
which was held at the Municipal Offices, Mr. Agg-Gardner again presiding.
The first Paper read was by Mrs. Bagnall-Oakeley, entitled Sanctuary
Knockers. The paper traced the origin and history of Sanctuaries — places
privileged by the Church or Sovereign wherein offenders could not be
arrested without sacrilege — and Mrs. Oakeley quoted from ancient docu-
ments a description of the process by which fugitives obtained the security
of the Sanctuary at various times and in various places. Two drawings were
exhibited of Sanctuary Knockers — one of a knocker at Durham Cathedral,
and the other of a knocker at the Church of St. Nicholas, Gloucester. This
Paper is printed in extenso ante page 131.
1 See "Gloucestershire Notes and Queries," Vol. II., p. 71-88.
Postlip Hall and Chapel. 205
Prof. Middletost next read a portion of a Paper he had written, com-
paring Roman domestic architecture in Rome with similar architecture in
this country, showing how the Romans, as a practical people, adapted
themselves to the climate in which they lived, and used the materials at
hand for building. At the suggestion of the General Secretary, Professor
Middleton agreed to read the remainder of his paper at the inspection of
Spoonley Villa on Wednesday. See his remarks post.
The last Paper was read by Mr. R. Taylor, of Edge House, near Stroud,
and was entitled A Plea for Old Tools. In it the writer described some of
the tools, articles of domestic use, and various implements which were in
use 50 years or a century ago, which are now obsolete and almost entirely
lost.
WEDNESDAY, 17th July, 1889.
A large party, consisting of about 100 members and their friends, started
this morning at 9.30 to make a long excursion to visit Southam House,
Cleeve Hill Camp, Postlip Hall and Chapel, Winchcombe, Spoonley Roman
Villa, Sevenhampton Church, and Whittington Court and Church. The first
halting place was
Southam House,
a mediaeval mansion built by Sir John Huddleston in the latter part of the
loth century. It is now occupied by the Rev. J. T. C. Stacey, through
whose courtesy the Society was permitted to visit it. It is not the Manor
House. That is situated near the chapel, a few hundred yards distant.
The house was visited by the Society on the occasion of its meeting at
Cheltenham in 1879, but, of course, many of the members then present are
no longer with us. At the time referred to the late Mr. S. H. Gael acted as
guide, and gave a historical account of the building and a description of the
portraits and of the heraldry in the house. Mr. Le Blanc was good enough
to read Mr. Gael's paper for the edification of those present. It is printed
in the Transactions of the Society, Vol. IV., pp. 21-23.
On the conclusion of these remarks the party made a hurried inspection
of the suites of rooms, and the President expressed to Mr. Stacey the thanks
of the Society for his obliging kindness, and to Mr. Le Blanc for reading the
paper. The journey was them resumed to
Cleeve Hill Camp,
which was described by Mr. G. B. Witts, and a Paper by him on the
subject will be printed in extenso post.
Postlip Hall and Chapel,
nestling in its Cotswold Vale, was one of the most picturesque of Gloucester-
shire homes. With its many gables, its giey, antiquated walls, its array of
dormer windows, and its quaintly-carved sheep on the chimney-stack it would
have sent Washington Irving into an ecstacy of delight, which would have
been increased on his entering the house and seeing the rich old oak carving
and wainscoting in rooms pervaded by the air of substantial old-fashioned
English comfort. The house was much admired, and the visitors would
have been glad to learn something of its history, but information on that
point was not forthcoming. The chief interest, from an archaeological point
Vol. XIV. p
20fi Transactions for the Year 18S9-90.
of view, centres in the chapel, which stands on rising ground at the back of
the Hall, and has long been desecrated. It was dismantled at the time of
the Revolution, and is now nothing more than a barn. Invited to describe its
architectural features, Mr. J. H. Middleton, F.S.A. , the Slade Professor of
Fine Art in the University of Cambridge, said it was an interesting and very
characteristic specimen of Norman work of about the year 1150. Not much
was known of its history, except that it seemed to have been served by the
Benedictine monks from the neighbouring Abbey of Winchcombe. The most
remarkable thing about it was the small opening and external corbel in the
south wall of the nave, at a considerable height above the floor : this sort of
"high side window " was not uncommon in English churches at one time,
but the use of it died out rather early ; it was intended to hold what was
called the Poor .Soul Light — a lamp lighted every night to invite passers-by,
or those who saw it at a distance, to pray for the souls of the dead. In
France it was sometimes placed in a round tower, like a miniature light-
house ; in England it was usually in the form of a high side window, and
was found in examples mostly in the 12th and 13th centuries. Attention
was also directed to the Norman doorway and the low chancel arch (Norman)
which suggested comparison with that seen at Tredington on the previous
day. Some remarks on the chapel from Mr. Petit's notes on the Archaeology
of the neighbourhood of Cheltenham, were read by the General Secretary (the
Rev. Wm. Bazeley), and then, in welcome sunshine, the party rejoined the
brakes, with appetites sharpened by the Cotswold breezes, for the refresh-
ment awaiting them at Winchcombe. On arrival there,
The Rev. W. Bazeley, as at Stoke Orchard, read some remarks on Post-
lip Hall and Chapel from the late Rev. J. L. Petit's Architectural Notes in
the neighbourhood forty-five years ago, to which we have before alluded.
Mr. Petit writes of the Manor House, that it is practically Elizabethan,
exhibits Perpendicular features, and, he adds, that the chapel seems to have
been touched by the same architect who designed or added to the hall, for
its east and west windows are late Perpendicular, and its belfry evidently
belongs to a later period, probably that in which the Elizabethan part of
the hall was built. He writes further : " There are some chimney-pieces of
the last named period remaining in the house (which is now only tenanted
by labourers)." He mentions a fine old barn among the farm buildings,
apparently of the Tudor period, the coping of one of the gables has the figure
of a man standing upright.
Of the chapel he says : " It consists of a nave and chancel, the belfry,
which is comparatively modern, stands over the chancel-arch. On the south
side is a fine doorway with a semi-circular arch of one order, supported by
a shaft, and enriched with chevrons on the surface of the archivolt. The
label is ornamented with balls on its inner surface, and the arch is filled up
with a transom covered with scale-work, above a band of work not uncom-
mon in advanced Norman, which may be described as a series of St. Andrew's
crosses. The same appears on the capitals of the shafts. The nave has one
narrow Norman window on the south side, and a corresponding one on the
north side. It has also the remains of a north door. The chancel has one
window similar to those of the nave on each side, the internal splays being
very deep."
X
h4
•Oz
Postlip Hall and Chapf.l.
207
The later features are, in the nave, a pointed plain niche on the north
side, near the chancel arch, and a trefoiled piscina on the south side. The
roof is a timber one, which seems as late as the 16th century. In the chancel
is a plain pointed niche on the north side, which has no appearance of having
been used as a piscina. There are
neither sedilia, piscina, nor door,
on the south side of the chancel.
But the principal feature is the
chancel arch, a round one, of two
orders, enriched, to the west-
ward with the chevron (on the
surface of the outer order of the
archivolt),the billet (on the label)
and the ornament I have already
mentioned, in a band round the
inner order of the arch, and the
abacus of the capitals (fig. 12).
The eastern face of the arch is
comparatively plain. The outer
order of the arch (to the west-
ward) is supported by a shaft
occupying the usual position be-
tween two salient angles. The
Fig. 12, Chancel Arch, Postlip. inner order on a larger engaged
shaft. The base has the claw that appears at Romsey and in other examples ;
and its mouldings shew it
to be very pure (though
not the earliest) Norman
(fid. 13). The chapel is now
only used as a barn, and
the chancel is altogether
unroofed (Plate X VIII. )
Considering Mr. Petit's
detailed description of this
little sacred building at
the time he wrote of un-
usual interest, we have
given it very fully, for
though it had been dese- Fig. 13, Base of Shaft of Arch, Postlip.
crated and converted to common uses before he wrote, doubtless it has
undergone greater changes since.
The devolution of the Manor and Chapel of Postlip is not so obscure
as has been supposed. It was one of the sixteen manors in the county held
by Ansfrid de Cormeilles at the time of the Domesday Survey. Ansfrid's
son or grandson, Richard, had a son and heir, Walter, whose daughter and
heir, Margaret, married Hugh de Poer, by whom she had a daughter and
coheir, who became the wife of Simon Solers. William de Solers, at the
request of his tenants, built a chapel in the time of Stephen, and dedicated
it to St. James, and endowed the Abbey of Tewkesbury with lands and
p2
208 Transactions for the Year 18S9-90.
tithes on condition that the monks should find a chaplain to perform Divine
service in the chapel on Sundays, Holydays, Wednesdays, and Fridays,
Fosbrooke, from whom these particulars are derived, shews the devolution
of the manor down to the present time (see Vol. II. , p. 347.)
The party then proceeded to
WlNCHCOMBE,
where luncheon had been provided in the schoolroom. The President
occupied the chair. After the luncheon, a very interesting announcement
was made by the Rev. F. E. Warren, Vicar of Frenchay, who stated on the
authority of M. Delisle that a 10th century Winchcombe missal had been
discovered in the town library at Orleans. The explanation of the matter,
he said, seems to be this. In the 10th century a monk from the monastery
of Fleury sur Loire was sent over by Oswald, Bishop of Worcester, to intro-
duce the Benedictine rule at Winchcombe. He, on his return to France,
carried the service book with him, and it remained at Fleury until the
French Revolution, when a great part of the library of the monastery was
destroyed, but this particular volume came into the hands of the Town
Council at Orleans, and can now be seen in the library of that city. It is to
be hoped, said Mr. Warren, that the future local historian would make an
effort to inspect it. These old missals are not only interesting from a litur-
gical point of view, but often contained entries respecting the manumission
of serfs and other matters of ai'chreological value. The Rev. W. Bazeley in
thanking Mr. Warren for the information, promised that he would call the
attention of Mr. Royce, who was engaged in . editing the cartularies of
Winchcombe Abbey, to the subject.
After an interval of about half-an-hour, during which the excursionists
strolled through the town, the ancient capital of Mercia, of which an
admirable history has been published by Mrs. Dent, and inspected the church
and other objects of interest, among which was a Fire Engine just a century
old, and the Public Stocks, preserved under the Town Hall, the journey was
resumed to visit the
Roman Villa at Spoon lev.
A drive over a difficult road, passing Sudeley on the left, brought them
to Spoonley Wood. The villa reached at last, Mrs. Dent, of Sudeley Castle,
whose interest in archaeology is well known, and to whose permission the
Society was indebted for the present variation of the day's proceedings,
was introduced by the Rev. W . Bazeley. Mr. Bazeley then explained that
the villa was discovered some six or seven years ago, and created a great
deal of interest at that time. For two years it lay open, and was so injured
by frost, rabbits, and also, he was afraid, by visitors, that Mrs. Dent thought
fit to restore the stones to the position in which they were first found, and
to cover over the best of the pavements, one of which, however, she had had
removed, rather earlier, to Sudeley Castle. The ground plan was as perfect
as that of any Roman villa he had seen, and in the restoration it had been
faithfully preserved. These remains, Mr. Bazeley added, were those of the
villa urbana, or the residence of the proprietor of the estate ; the villa
ruatica, or farm, was still unexcavated, and he hoped that at some future
time Mrs. Dent would allow them to open it.
Roman Villa at Spoonley. 209
Professor MlDDLETON then gave a lucid address on Roman Domestic
Architecture, with especial reference to the points of difference between that
in England and that in Italy. He said much had been written about the
Roman house as if there were one tixed type of plan ; but this was a mistake.
There was really an endless variety, determined by considerations of site,
surroundings, cost of ground, and whether the house was situated in town
or country. The Romans adapted their buildings with great practical skill to
different requirements, and thus a different house was needed in a very rainy
country where cold lasts longer than in Italy. In Britain the climate affected
the plan of the house, as seen in the absence of the Atrium or open Peristyle.
The windows were universally glazed (in Italy not always), and a more
extensive use of hypocausts and flue-tiles was needed to warm the rooms.
For fuel, coal was, in some cases, though rarely, used as well as wood,
especially near the Forest of Dean. Another important point of difference
was that of materials In Italy the Romans used pozzolaua, which made a
cement concrete like solid stone ; in this country, that material not being
available, the walls were not made of concrete, but of rubble frequently,
with lacing courses of brick. Vaults were rarer, and there were more wood
floors. Upper storeys seem always to have been built, often of wood, which
was plentiful in Britain, and half-timbered work was used much like that of
medieval houses. The roofs in Italy were usually tiled, or, in costly build-
ings covered with marble or bronze ; here they were more commonly covered
with the so-called Stonefield slate, fastened with large iron nails. The
hypocausts, owing to the lack of pozzolaua, were made either with pike very
closely set, or simply a series of flues ran horizontally through the concrete
mass of the floor. Marble was very little employed, though in temples in
the south of Britain blocks of white Luna marble did occur, and at Silchester
the Basilica had crustoz of white marble. As a rule, however, there was no
marble, and so mosaics of similar design to those in Italy were made with
tessera; of red clay, blue lias, and brown and white limestone. Glass tessene
did not occur in Britain as a rule. The water supply and baths of the
Roman-British houses were influenced by the fact of lead being much more
plentiful in Britain than in Italy, as well as water. The pipes were not
made of clay or stone, but of very thick lead. Water was laid on to upper
floors, and in streets a central main was laid down, with rising mains
branching right and left. The hot baths were sometimes lined with lead of
great thickness as illustrated by the plates found in the great bath at
Bath, which the Corporation of that place were barbarous enough to sell
as old metal. The lead was obtained from mines in the Mendip hills,
in Shropshire, and Cornwall. As in Italy, the cold baths were lined with
opus signinum, made of lime and pounded pottery. Amid the differences
thus described, the methods of decoration in Roman houses generally were
the same. Mosaics with exactly similar patterns were found in examples
in Italy, Greece, Africa, Gaul, and Britain. The painting and stucco
reliefs were also of the same character, only perhaps in mouldings of stone
and in sculpture a local rudeness was sometimes observable. The general
plan of Roman towns in Britain was often modelled on a military castrum
Gloucester and Chichester are examples of this, in which wc still sec the four
main streets in the centre, where in mediaeval times the cross was erected.
Turning from the general subject of his notes to that of the villa at Spoonley,
210 Transactions fok the Year 1SS9-90.
the Professor said it was quite impossible to mark out the special purpose to
which each room was applied, but doubtless the sleeping apartments were
upstairs. In the middle of the central block was the Tablinum and the winter
triclinium : near it was the kitchen, and a great part of one of the wings was
taken up by hot and cold baths. From the mouldings on the capitals he
should be inclined to believe that the date of the villa was not before 200 ;
it might have been earlier than that, but probably it was not older than
the time of Severus. The sincere thanks of all antiquaries are due both to
Mrs. Dent and Mr. Bazeley for the money and care that have been expended
on the excavation of this most interesting Roman house, and the very suc-
cessful measures which they have taken for its future preservation.
At the conclusion of this address, the visitors inspected the carefully-
preserved pavement, and the collection of Roman pottery, coins, and other
relics, which had been found in the excavation, and which Mrs. Dent had
caused to be brought from Sudeley Castle expressly for the occasion. Before
leaving, the President, in the name of the Society, thanked the Lady of
Sudeley for her kind and courteous reception, and added, that possibly on
some future occasion they might revisit Spoonley, to inspect the villa rustica,
which had yet to be opened. Mrs. Dent replied that she had been most
pleased to welcome the Society, and she should be delighted if the members
came, each with a spade, to continue the excavations : if they did so she
would provide the bread and cheese, and they might be rewarded for their
pains by some discovery of importance.
In great good humour the antiquaries retraced their steps through the
tangled albeit particularly sloppy wood, to Waterhatch farm, where the
brakes were in waiting for them. Owing, however, to the hilly nature of
the road for a couple of miles or so, a considerable amount of pedestrian
exercise had to be taken before the drive could be fairly resumed. A great
deal of time was thus lost, and as the party, by the kind invitation of Mrs.
Dobell, were to have afternoon tea at
Whittington Court
at five o'clock, one feature of the programme was of necessity omitted. This
was regretted, as the members were unavoidably deprived of the pleasure of
a visit to Sevenhampton Church, upon which the Rev. J. Melland Hall, for-
merly vicar of the parish, was to have read a paper. The paper will, however,
appear in due course in the printed Transactions, so that it will not be lost
to the Society. At Whittington Court a cordial and hospitable welcome was
extended by Mr. and Mrs. Dobell, and, after tea, the visitors inspected the
adjacent church, where they were received by the rector, the Rev. A. C.
Lawrence. The church, though small, and by so called restoration consider-
ably modernised in general appearance, contains elements of antiquity and
interest. The objects which principally attracted the notice of the archae-
ologists were the two recumbent effigies now at the west end, concerning
which Mr. Albert Hartshorne has some notes in his Paper on Monumental
Effigies in the neighbourhood of Cheltenham, printed in the fourth volume
of the Transactions of the Society. The effigies are of stone, and of the early
part of the 14th century ; the armorial bearings on their shields showing
them to represent members of the ancient family of Crupes. The Roll of
Arms of Peers and Knights in the reign of Edw. II. gives the arms of this
Whittington Coukt. 211
family thus : — " Sir Richard de Crupes, de argent a vi muscles de youles e un
label de azure.'" Fusils, however, and not mascles, are shown on the shield,
which was doubtless a blunder on the part of the local sculptor. The effigies
represent Richard de Crupes, who died in 1278, and his son of the same
name who was living in 1316. Richard de Crupes possessed the manor of
Whittington in the time of Henry III., and had a grant of markets, fairs,
and free warren here in 1256. The grant was allowed in the proceedings on
a writ of quo warranto in 15th Edward I., and the family appear to have
flourished at Whittington until the middle of the 14th century. A peculiarity
about these effigies, remarks Mr. Hartshorne, is an extra protection or facing
over the brow and temples. They both exhibit surcotes of great length,
hauberks and quilted gambesons, and are carved with much freedom and
simplicity. In Whittington church also there is a stone effigy of no great
merit, of a lady wearing a gown and wimple, probably the wife of one of the
men. The visitors having examined with much interest the church and
effigies again took their places in the vehicles and returned to Cheltenham
with the consciousness that they had had an enjoyable though long and
fatiguing day.
THURSDAY, ISth July, 1S89.
The concluding meeting of the Society was held at the Municipal Offices on
Thursday morning, the President in the chair. Votes of thanks were given
to the Mayor and Corporation for the use of the Council Chamber, and to
the Local Committee, and especially to Mr. G. B. Witts, the Local Hon.
Secretary, for the excellent arrangements made for the meeting. Mr. Witts,
in responding, said he must share the honours with Mr. E. Wethered, and
further said they had by no means exhausted the examination of the anti-
quities of Cheltenham and the district. If the Society paid another visit to
the town he should be pleased to arrange for another three days' meeting of
a totally different district from the places now visited. Thanks were also
accorded to the Rev. J. G. Day, Rev. B. P. Hemming, Rev. G. E. Webster,
Rev. A. C. Lawrence, Rev. W. R. Coxwell-Rogers, and the Rev. the Hon.
G. G. C. Talbot, Rector of Withington, for the facilities afforded by them in
allowing the membei s to visit their respective churches, and for the infor-
mation imparted on those occasions ; also to Mr. and Mrs. Gibbons and Mr.
and Mrs. Dobell for their hospitable receptions at Boddington Manor and
Whittington Court ; to the tenant of Stoke Orchard Manor House, to Rev.
J. T. C, Stacey, Mrs. Evans, Mrs. Dent, and Lord Eldon for the privilege of
visiting Southam House, Postlip Hall, and the Roman Villas in Spoonley
Wood and Chedworth ; to Professor Middleton, Mr. G. B. Witts, and the
Rev. William Bazeley, for their assistance as guides ; and to Mr. Gibbons,
Mrs. Bagnall-Oakeley, Professor Middleton, Mr. R. Taylor, and the Rev. J.
Melland Hall, for having prepared Papers.
It was agreed that next annual Summer Meeting of the Society shall be
held at Bristol, under the Presidency of Dr. Beddoe, F.R.S., and it Mas
announced that arrangements were being made for a Meeting in September
next at Chepstow, to include a visit to the old Bishop's Palace at Matherne
and the Roman City of Caerwent, the latter one of the two advanced posts
in the country of the bihues.
212 Transactions for the Year 1S89-90.
On the motion of Sir Brook Kay, Bart., seconded by Mr. R. V. Vassar-
Smith, a further vote of thanks was accorded to Mr. Agg-Gardner for the
courteous and able manner in which he had presided at the meetings.
Mr. Agc-Gardner, in acknowledging it, said that it was much more
healthy and instructive amusement to visit the breezy Cotswolds in company
with intellectual Mends than to be in "another place" where he would
otherwise have found himself listening to the somewhat dry and uninterest-
ing discusions which there took place.
Punctually at 10.15 a party numbering about 140 left the Plough Hotel
yard in brakes, en rout" for Dowdeswell and Withington, and the Roman
Villa at Chedworth. The first halt was made at
Dowdeswell Church.
where the party was met by the Rector, the Rev. W. Coxwell-Rogers, who
read a brief account of the parish church, written several years ago by the
late Mr. S. H. Gael. Of the parish Mr. Gael says : " In a country of Wells —
Owdswell, Sandiwell, Colwell (Colnwell), Whitewell, Isinwell, Elwell— is
situate the village of Dowdeswell, Fons Dodonis of the ancient charters.
Owdswell was the Fons Odonis ; and these names call back Odo and Dodo,
Mercian chieftains of note, and founders of the Abbey of Tewkesbury, some
years before the Norman Conquest, with whom these two places are said
to have been in some way connected, though the connection may be fanciful
from mere resembance of sound. However that may be, if in those early
days there gathered near Dodo's well a tribe of herdsman, to tend their sheep
and swine on the adjacent forests and widespread uplands, it is more likely
that the Tabernacle for their Worship would be wooden, a material corres-
ponding to the scene of their occupation, than the substantial stone edifice
now existing. And it is noteworthy that the name, ' Oaken Church Hay,'
is still attached to a spot at the western edge of Dowdeswell Wood, close
to one of those primitive tracks — the packway."
"Dowdeswell Church," Mr. Gael says, "is indeed in its main features
a post-Reformation structure. An earlier Chapel there doubless was, for
the living, though a Rectory, was a Chapel to the great Church of Withing-
ton, a peculiar jurisdiction of the See of Worcester. Remains within the
Church (Brasses, &c), and without, the Sculptured Stones representing
Zechariah's Golden Seven-branch Candlestick ; the Lamb bound for the
slaughter ; &c. , lately dug up on the site, and now re-set, medallion-wise,
in the new-built walls, testify to an earlier building. Moreover, the South
Porch, though its handsome Tudor Arch is of a late style, has traces of a
piscina, and the South Window of the Nave is lancet-headed and earlier.
But the Chancel, Nave, and Transepts (the Church being cruciform) are of
similar height and character ; the Parochial Records preserve the date when
the Tower and its Spire (1575), and when the South Transept (1630), were
built by, and at the charges of, the Possessors of the Estates of Upper
Dowdeswell (Abyngton), and the Lower Dowdeswell (Rogers).
The chancel has a Perpendicular window, almost round-headed, now
removed to the North transept gable, in displacement of a square-headed
Tudor Window, like those still in the East and West walls of that transept.
These and the design of the internal arches of the tower, show a general
conformity of construction in re-construction in style, and not far apart, and
all late.
DoWDESWELL COURT. 213
The West window of the South transept is of a form which occurs in the
North and South sides of Whitftngton Church (the next parish). These
latter, it may be inferred from a monumental inscription to a rector there —
Dr. Ingram, who died in 1756 — were inserted by him. The gable window of
the South transept is also of this style. Instead of tracery, its head,
externally, has arcaded mouldings in relief, and it is square within. A
conjecture may be hazarded that these details are due, in design and perhaps
in execution, to the masons of the noble, classic Tudor edifice of the neigh-
bourhood— Whittington Court. The West window is of debased style, and
good, though recent, workmanship.
The tower contains three bells. It has plain, round-headed, louvre
openings on its sides ; from a cant on it, rises the octagonal spire, which is
brought to the square by bold broaches. It has four sharp-pitched dormers
midway up, and a rose finial, surmouuted with a cross and vane. The
whole interior is effectively thrown together by the four arches of the tower,
which are comparatively lofty. The belfry floor is supported by a ribbed-
fan vaulting. The font is of stone, octagonal in shape, with quartre-foil
panels. There is an organ — a modern instrument of great power and com-
pass.1 As to the monuments, &c. ; on a flat stone in the floor is a brass effigy
of an ecclesiastic, without any scroll to denote name or date, but in two of
corners are brass plates, representing two of the evangelistic symbols. There
is another such plate detached, and probably there was a fourth, now miss-
ing.- This, and two adjacent flat stones are of the sandstone formation,
and consequently were brought from a distance.
There is also a flat stone in the South transept, with an incised cross, on
a pedestal of early date, but withont inscription. These are relics of the old
chapel. The monuments of later dates exhibit, perhaps, more than usual
varieties of taste and style of form and epitaph. A yew tree in the church-
yard, described by Bigland as " of primeval date, and in a state of very
flourishing vegetation," flourishes still, and as Mr. Gael says " may see. the
decay of some generations yet to come."
Dowdeswell Camp was the next place to have been visited, but want of
time prevented it, and a pleasant drive brought the party to
Withixgtox Church,
from the bells of which the ringers sent out a hearty peal. The Vicar, the
Rev. the Hon. G. <J. C. Talbot, met the party, and pointed to two or three
interesting features of the church, and then Prof. Middleton kindly acceded
to a request made him, and made some remarks thereon. The structure was
restored some sixteen or seventeen years ago. The church, Prof. Middleton
said, is an exceptionally interesting one, and has in many respects followed
the rule of development commonly seen in English parish churches. It was
originally a small Norman church consisting simply of a nave and chancel,
and was built about 1160, as evidenced by the extreme richness of the
1 This has now been removed and replaced by a harmonium.
2 The loose one is now lost, as is also the inscription. The Brass is mentioned bj
Haines, who assigns to it the date cir. 1520, and is more fully described in Mr. Cecil l)a\ is's
"Gloucestershire Brasses," No. liv. The figure is said to be habited in processional vest-
ments : viz., a long flowing; cassock reaching to the ground, entirely concealing the feet, a
full plaited surplice rather shorter, with immense sleeves, around the neck the almucc, and
over all a cope fastened across the breast by a square morse.— En.
214 Transactions for the Year 1S89-90.
mouldings of the south door. Early in the 13th century the chancel seems
to have been extended and the central tower partly rebuilt. In the 14th
century the upper part of the beautiful central tower was built and the
south transept, which contains a beautiful decorated window, added. An
unusual feature is that early in 13th century the chevron moulding of a
round arch was re-used in the construction of a pointed arch in the north
wall of the chancel. A clerestory and large west window date from the 15th
century ; a rare feature is to be seen on the north side of the chancel, where
there is a recess made to hold a small lead cistern, which unfortunately is
not in its original position and was probably altered when moved. The
water was drawn off from the little cistern in the recess by a pipe and tap.
The carved stone boss, witli a central hole through which the pipe passed,
still exists. In monastic churches these little cistern-recesses are not un-
common, but in parish churches they are very rare. A very similar example
is to be seen in the north wall of the sanctuary of Highworth church in
Wiltshire. The use of this supply of water was probably for the washing
of the chalice, paten and other sacred vessels. In the churchyard is a grave-
stone to the memory of Mrs. Horlick, who died about a century ago, and
upon which is the following quaint inscription : —
In January ninety-one
She was delivered of a son,
And after that her time was short,
Before this world she did depart,
A husband young- she left behind
For another wife to find
As good as she — he wished no more
Until his fleeting life was o'er ;
And then in hope to meet again
In Heaven, in the happy train,
Chedworth Roman Villa
was reached about one o'clock, and the party at once made their way to a
marquee wherein a substantial luncheon, liberally provided by the President,
awaited them. After the repast, the company drank to the health of
the Queen, and then Sir Brook Kay gave the toast of "Our President,"
enumerating the services Mr. Agg-Gardner had rendered to the Society, and
thanking him for the elegant feast, a feast, he said, which the Roman resi-
dents might have envied. " The Secretaries— general and local," was given
by the chairman. A vote of thanks having been passed to Lord Eldon for
allowing the Society to visit the villa, the compauy adjourned to the open
air to listen to a general description of it by Prof. Middleton.
Standing on the doorstep of the Roman bath, and addressing the company
standing or reclining on the greensward before him, Prof. Middleton first
made some general observations on the villa, which he said is one of the
most characteristic examples of the difference between the construction of
Roman buildings in Italy and in Britain. It consisted of a large quadrangle
surrounded by what resembled very much the mediaeval cloister. Unfor-
tunately, in England the Romans were unable to rind that very fine cement
they had in Italy, and they had here to use wood instead of concrete in the
construction of the upper stories, and hence only the portions being preserved.
In Rome there are still three or four of these houses left, one, the house of
the Vestals, being in most respects far more like a villa of British con-
struction than those usually built in Italy, the reason being that it was
Chedworth Roman Villa. 215
erected for six ladies who, presumably from their chilly disposition, had to
be housed in a building constructed on the plan followed in the colder
atmosphere of Britain. The house of the Vestals, which adjoins the Forum,
is one of the most perfect Roman houses that has been discovered, and is
strikingly like the Chedworth villa, though about double the size, while the
quadrangle is made of two squares instead of one, and running round the
building are columns of marble instead of the stone which, by force of
circumstances, was used in Britain. On the ground floor were the ordinary
sitting-rooms, kitchens, and bath-rooms, the bed-rooms (as in all Roman
buildings) being upstairs. The handsome staircases are all lined with
marble, and each of the Vestals appears to have had a separate suite of
rooms. The Vestals were not allowed to have the usual water supply laid
on, for religious reasons, these sacred priestesses not being allowed to use
such comparatively modern inovations as leaden pipes. Passing on to details
of the villa at Chedworth, the Professor said the first special point of con-
struction worthy of notice is the characteristic mosaic, red clay having to
be used for red marble, and various coloured limestones for the other
colours, all being laid carefully on three distinct layers of concrete. Another
skilful piece of construction, of which there is an example here, is the man-
ner in which the Romans lined their baths, in cases where they did not use
lead, with a composition made up of broken pottery, lime, and sand, which
resisted well the action of water. A third point to note is that the walls
here were built in the characteristic British way and quite unlike the houses
in Italy ; the fine natural cement before alluded to not being available, they
were composed of a sort of rubble made of soft oolite which had not withstood
the ravages of time very well. The fourth point of note is the very inter-
esting roof tiles, which are characteristic of England and unlike those in
Italy — stones made of Stonesfield slate. The next feature of interest is the
very well-preserved hypocausts or hollow floors under •which the hot air
from the furnaces spread to heat the rooms above. There is a great differ-
ence between the Italian and British construction of these, which depends
again on the absence of the fine cement. In Britain a number of small
supporting pillars had to be used, whereas in Italy these were often dis-
pensed with altogether, the builders relying entirely on the strength of the
cement for the support of the floor. In many cases even large upper
rooms had a flat concrete floor, which was practically like one immense
slab of stone, needing no support except at its edges, and thus exerting
no side thrust on the walls as an arched vault would have done. In
Britain " contignationes " or wooden floors were mainly used for the upper
rooms.
Breaking up into four sections, under the guidance of Prof. Middleton,
Rev. W. Bazeley, Mr. Witts, and Mr. Wethered, the party went on a round
of inspection. Particular attention was directed to the building in the
corner in which is a small pond. The late Canon Lysons contended that
this was a baptistery, while others ridicule the idea of religious associations,
and aver that it was simply a fish-pond. Mr. Bazeley, however, expressed
his opinion that the building was originally a heathen temple, and that a
subsequent resident of the villa was a Christian, and used the building as a
baptistery.
At 4.30 the brakes were re-entered, and Cheltenham was reached about
6 o'clock, thus closing what was unanimously voted a day of unalloyed
enjoyment.
216
Transactions for the Year 1SS9-90.
©r.
(Jfyra&attDns of tije Human
Sir JOHN MACLEAN.
1887
FIRST LIST OF DONATIONS
Aug.
11
To Sir Henry Barkly, K.C.B., K.C.M.G., &c.
25
Sir William V. Guise, Bart.
-
27
G. E. Lloyd Baker, Esq.
-
Rev. C. S. Taylor
-
Francis James, Esq.
-
John Walker, Esq.
-
Rev. Prebendary Scarth -
-
28
A. H. Paul, Esq.
-
C. Bowley, Esq.
-
30
Rev. David Royce
-
Robert Taylor, Esq.
-
Sir John Maclean, F.S.A., &c.
-
Sep.
1
Sir Brook Kay, Bart.
-
2
W. P. Price, Esq.
-
5
Sir John Dorington, Bart., M.P.
-
9
Thomas Rome, Esq.
-
W. C. Heane, Esq.
-
10
A. T. Martin, Esq.
-
15
Rev. J. M. Lamb
-
23
S. H. Swayne, Esq.
-
24
John Bush, Esq.
-
Oct.
1
E. A. Hudd, Esq.
-
F. F. Tuckett, Esq.
-
W. E. George, Esq.
■
3
G. W. Keeling,
-
4
C. P. Stewart, Esq.
-
W. H. Harford, Esq.
-
Oct.
18
R. Randall, Esq.
-
Rev. H. L. Thompson
-
R. A. Charleton, Esq.
-
Rev. James L. Peach
-
E. Hartland, Esq.
-
W. C. Lucy, Esq.
-
Rev. G. D. Bourne
-
T. S. Bush, Esq.
-
24
Edward Bush, Esq.
-
26
Lord Sherborne
-
Nov
. 4
P. i). Prankerd, Esq.
-
£ s.
d.
1 0
O
1 1
0
0 10
0
0 10
0
1 0
0
1 0
0
1 1
0
1 0
0
1 0
0
1 1
0
1 0
0
1 1
0
1 0
0
1 0
0
1 0
0
1 0
0
1 0
0
] 1
(1
0 10
0
1 0
0
1 1
0
1 0
0
1 0
0
1 0
0
1 0
(1
1 0
l>
1 0
(1
2 2
0
0 10
6
0 10
0
1 0
0
1 0
0
0 10
0
0 10
6
0 5
0
I 1
0
1 0
0
1 0
II
£35 5
0
Excavations of the Roman Villa, Tockington Park.
21'
1887
©ilia, Cockington Park.
Per Contra.
By Travelling Expenses to and from Tockington Park
Petty Expenses, Postage, &c.
Wages of Excavators
Mr. Smith for rilling up the Excavation by agree-
ment -
Donation to Mr. Smith by the Council -
£r.
2
4
1
0
5
8
12
19
6
5
0
0
o
2
0
22
11
3
By Balance carried forward
12 13 9
£35 5 0
218 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
<B?):ca&att0tt8 of tljt lomau
Ev. Sir JOHN MACLEAN.
1888 Balance brought forward from last year - £12 13 9
SECOND LIST OF DONATIONS.
£ s.
d.
May 8
To Sir W. F. G. Guise, Bart.
-
1 1
0
12
Collected by Mr. A. T. Martin
-
1 0
(I
16
R. A. Charleton, Esq.
-
0 10
0
May 24
Rev. F. J. Poynton
-
0 10
0
June 22
P. D. Prankerd, Esq.
-
1 1
0
27
Sir Brook Kay, Bart.
-
1 10
0
29
Sir Henry Barkly, K.C.B., &c.
-
1 1
0
July 4
Robert Taylor, Esq.
-
2 2
0
5
W. H. Harford, Esq.
-
1 0
0
19
Rev. S. E. Bartleet
-
0 10
0
25
F. F. Tuckett, Esq.
-
1 0
0
Society of Antiquaries
-
5 5
0
31
Anonymous
-
0 5
0
Right Rev. Bishop Twells
-
1 0
0
Profits of Meeting at Tockington,
on Oct. 18th,
1887
-
7 0
•2
£37 8 11
Excavations of the Roman- Villa, Tockington Park. 219
mm, oujcKtnpm
pmu
Per Contra.
188S
By Travelling Expenses
err.
£ s. d.
0 17 6
Wages of Excavators
•
17 10 4
1889 Ditto -
-
4 16 3
Travelling Expenses-
■
I 0 0
By Balance paid the Treasurer in aid of Hi titrations
Certified, JOHN MACLEAN.
13 4 10
£37 8 11
o
00
GO
CO
«
H
S
W
Cm
M
ft
CO
Ch
W
O
W
8
JH © © © O CO O O © © © "M O 5N © -J ©
. ^h ©Oi-iecei5I>"-<©^tiMSt~>CN«OcNcNOO
«rt!
o
o
PP
cq
aJ
o
45
"3
PP
>->
M
I
</><*
CO — <
oo •£
""* &
© © — i to -* tjh rt © ic © © cn © oo r- "*
C4 o ^ i— i -h re
60
• l-l
•w
CD
cd
>..s
S CD &J0
pi-j teH .5
o ^ IS
x s- <»
: SPx^
i .9 o3 1— •
' &S 5
g<o 2
-*lQCOt-~O0O5© —
cooooococoopo-. c:
ec^t<io©r— ceo©
ooooooooooooooai
OOOOCOCOCOOOOOCO
PP -
fci "-
J> "£,000000
P-i .|—J' — I ' — ■ ^ r^ ^ tJ ■
o
10
©
X
S o o o o o o
sQpoapa
I
©•*>
oo "S
J p-
CD
a>
&H
CD
O •
£ °
o 2
— —
.BO
0)
"T
4-
o
CO
3
I*
so- a?
Q-S.
■Jfl
a cd
P x
PP
w f- CO © o
<" - © © t-
-# -.o t— iq
-- -h « oi
*>,
sh
' ©
o
=4-1
• • S •
.s
&0 P5 •
a m . ,
It OS
Si -*
CI cc
CD
O
c
&
1$
PP
it.
1C
! n
CO
Qh
cs o
CO O
3^
o^
£ H
3 ~o
o©
GO
cd .a
CO Q
CD +3 © >>
CO © in +3
B b S 0)
SPhPhP
o - „ -
E-i - - -
00^'
OO — <
05
r-* -1 O
i-H
© -H
©
'S ^|
^■1
1— 1
«
. K5 -*
JO 1—1
©
l-H
©lO
»— 1
CO
^t^^
CO
--rt
CM t^
CO
CO
cX
H
Pm
i— 1
P^
O
x
D
P^
PP
O-i
o In
PQX
>.
PP
•-rtoS
c3
©
Si)
s
o
©
o
<3
PP
o
o
t>0
s
2x
© X
©■2
ctf CO
i-H CO
PP yA
05
1^
CO
3 >>
O
O 0)
O
cSPP
H
PP
%
PP
CP M_i
fl O
CD
0 g
«4H 0
Si
CD
Ph
CO
O c3
CD eS
CD
gPP
c3
PP
O
H
s
<
^^
Pa
PPUl
3
Lelakd ik Gloucestershire.
LELAND IN GLOUCESTERSHIRE.
By JOHN LATIMER.
John Leland, the Father of English Antiquaries, from whose
celebrated Itinerary the following compilation has been made, was
born in London about the beginning of the 16th century, and was
educated at St. Paul's School, Christ Church College, Cambridge,
and All Souls' College, Oxford. Subsequently he resided for some
time in France, where he is said to have become an accomplished
linguist. How he was introduced to the notice of Henry VIII.
is unknown, but in the accounts of the Treasurer of the Chamber
for 1528, amongst the items under "Quarters wages due at
Christmas," is the following: — "For Sir John Leylonde's Exhib-
ition, 25s.," and the same item occurs in March, 1529. * The
pension then disappears, but on the 17th June, 1530, Leland, who
had probably returned from France, was presented by the King
to the rectory of Peppeling in the Marches of Calais,2 although,
as will presently be seen, he had not then received ordination as
a deacon. As his name appears in a lengthy list of courtiers who
received New Year's gifts of plate from the King in January,
1533,3 he was doubtless in the royal service, and may already
have been, as he soon afterwards certainly was, the palace libra-
rian. In the following May he co-operated with Nicholas Udal
in composing " divers verses," Latin and English, which were
recited before Anne Boleyn, in the London pageant in honour
of her coronation. Yet in the Vatican Registers, dated three
months later, is a record of a dispensation of Pope Clement VII.
for John Leyland, B.A., rector of Pippeling, to hold as many as
four benefices, not exceeding a total value of 1000 ducats,
" leaving him within the next seven years to take priest's orders,
provided he takes sub-deacon's orders within the first two."4
Tins remarkable dispensation must have been applied for in view
1 Calendar, Vol. V., 305, 31S. - Ibid., Vol. IV., 2919.
* Ibid., Vol. VI., 14. 4 Ibid., Vol. VI., 682.
Vol. XIV. y
222 Transactions for the Ykar 1889-90.
of the prolonged inquiry which Leland was authorised to make
about the same date, by a Commission under the Great Seal,
appointing him the King's Antiquary, and empowering him,
according to his own expression, to investigate " England's Anti-
quities, and to diligently search all the libraries of monasteries
and colleges of this realm, to the intent that the monuments
of ancient writers might be brought out of deadly darkness to
lively light."1 That little time was lost in commencing this task
is proved by a letter from Sir George Lawson, Treasurer of Ber-
wick, to Cromwell, dated June, 1534, in which the writer
mentions an incident that had just occurred whilst he was " walk-
iug with Master Leylond in the Cathedral Church of York." 2
Some difficulty may afterwards have arisen respecting Leland's
non-residence in France, for in July, 1536, Henry VIII. granted
him a dispensation to absent himself from Peppeling "at his
pleasure.3 Nevertheless, from some cause unexplained, the anti-
quary was prevented from prosecuting his travels during the next
two or three years, since it is clear that nearly all his obser-
vations were noted down after the suppression of the greater
monasteries. And in his " JSTewe Yeares Gyfte" to his royal
master, presented in 1546, Leland states that his itinerary had
been made "by the space of these vi. yeres past," fixing its
commencement in 1540. How thoroughly he had executed his
commission is best shown by his own statement. " Al my other
Occupations intermitted, I have so travelid yn yowr Dominions
boothe by the Se Costes and the midle Partes, sparing nother Labor
nor Costes, that there is almoste nother Cape, nor Bay, Haven,
Creke or Peere, River or Confluence of Rivers, Brechis, Waschis,
Lakes, Meres, Fenny Waters, Montaynes, Valleis, Mores, Hethes,
Forestes, Chases, Woodes, Cities, Burges, Castelles, principale
Manor Placis, Monasteries, and Colleges, but I have seene them ;
and notyd yn so doing a hole Worlde of thinges very memorable."
Leland went on to promise the King, " if God sende me Life
to accomplische my Beginninges," a map of England engraved on
a table of silver, and a civil history and topographical description
1 Newe Yeares Gyfte, Hearne's Edition, Vol. I., xviii.
a Cal., Vol. VII., (J37. a Life, 10.
Lelaxd in Gloucestershire. 223
of the kingdom, to which were to be added six books on the
adjacent islands, and three books more containing royal and noble
genealogies from the Saxon times downwards. To carry out this
purpose he retired to his private house in London, intending to
digest the mass of materials he had collected. But the death of
Henry VIII., a few months later, was a heavy blow to the zealous
antiquary, for the rapacious men who assumed power had no
sympathy with his labours, deprived him, it is said, of the stipend
he had hitherto received, and inspired him with anxiety respect-
ing the security of his manuscripts. He fell, in consequence, into
a depressed state of mind, which i*esulted soon afterwards in a
mental alienation from which he never recovered. He died on
the 18th April, 1552. He held at his death his first preferment
near Calais, the rectory of Haseley, Oxfordshire, and the prebend
of East and West Knowle in Salisbury Cathedral.
Much interest was immediately felt in the antiquary's manu-
scripts, and offers to purchase them were made to his brother and
heir. But Edward VI. gave instructions that they should be
taken into the custody of his able tutor, Sir John Cheek, who
intended to digest and publish them, but was prevented by the
troubled state of the country. Sir John afterwards gave four
folio volumes of the papers (the Collectanea) to a Mr. Purefoy,
one of Queen Elizabeth's councillors. The rest were dispersed
into many hands, but a portion was re gathered by Sir Robert
Cotton, and forms part of the varied treasures of the British
Museum. Another portion, including eight volumes of the
Itinerary, was recovered by William Burton, the eminent Leices-
tershire antiquary, who, after obtaining the four volumes already
mentioned from Mr. Purefoy's son, eventually presented nearly
the whole to the Bodleian Library. The eighth volume of the
Itinerary, which had been lent by Burton to a friend, was pre-
sented to that library long after his death. Unfortunately, in the
course of their wanderings, the papers, and especially the Itin-
erary, had suffered so greatly from damp and neglect that they
threatened to perish altogether. Burton had taken the precau-
tion to get a copy taken of the damaged parts, including many
pages which have since been lost, and luckilv a still earlier
Q 2
224 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
transcript of five volumes of the Itinerary, made by John Stowe,
the historian of London, within about 24 years of Leland's death,
was also brought to light. Aided by these and other documents,
the laborious Thomas Hearne edited the first printed edition of
the Itinerary, which appeared in 1710-12, in nine small volumes.
A second edition, carefully revised, was published in 1745, and a
third in 1768-70. Copies of all these issues are now very rare,
and are beyond the reach of all but wealthy collectors.
In the following extracts relating to Gloucestershire the
original text has been faithfully followed. An attempt has been
made to collect the scattered fragments, which are very numerous,
so as to bring together all that relates to each locality ; but the
notes respecting Sodbury have defied this arrangement. Nothing
has been added save the headings in capitals, denoting the cities,
market towns, &c, and a few observations placed within brackets.
The date of Leland's visit, or visits, for he seems to have been
twice in Gloucestershire, cannot be accurately fixed. As he
speaks of the "cathedrals" of Gloucester and Bristol, the earliest
journey must have been subsequent to 1541. There are, it will
be observed, several repetitions and some contradictory passages
in the rough notes of the traveller, which would doubtless have
been removed if he had lived to accomplish his great undertaking.
The object of this paper being to place before the reader a literal
transcript of the manuscript, it has been deemed undesirable to
make any alteration in the text.
NORTHLEACH, LECHLADE AND FAIRFORD.
Vol. ii., p. 47, et seq.
From Faring ton onto S. John's- Bridge of 3. Arches of Stone
and a Causey a 3. Miles dim. al by low grownd, and subject to
the overfiowinges of lsis.
I lerned that Northlech-hroke, that cummith after to Estleche,
enterith into lsis a litle byneth S. John's- Jiridg.
This Northlech Water cummith from North to South.
Northlech is a praty uplandisch Toune viij. Miles from S. John's-
Bridg by North. Estleche is a 5. Miles lower, both set ripa citer.
as I cam.
Leland in Gloucestershire. 225
As I rode over Isis I lernid that ulta. lipa was in Glocestre-
shir, and citerior and [in] Barkshir, and Oxfordshir not far of.
At the very ende of S. John's- Bridge in ripa idteriori on the
right Hond I saw a Chapelle in a Medow, and greate Enclosures
of stone Waulles.
Heere was in hominum memoria a Priory of Blake Chanons of
the Patronage of the Duke of Clarance or York. When this
Priory was suppressid there were 3. Cantuaries erectid in the
Chirch of Lechelade ; and ther remaynid ontylle of late dayes one
Undrewoode, Decane of Wallinyforde founde Meanes that 2. of
these Cantuaries should be at Wallingford-College, and the third
to remaine at Lechelade.
From 6'. John's-Bridge to Lechelade about half a Mile, it is a
praty olde Village, and hath a pratie pyramid of Stone, at the
West Ende of the Chirch.
From Lechelade to Fairford about a 4. Miles al by low ground,
in a maner in a levelle, most apt for grasse, but very barein of
Woodde.
Fairford is a praty uplandisch Toune, and much of it longith
with the Personage to Teivhesbyri-Ahhay.
There is a fair Mansion Place of the Tames hard by the Chirch
Yarde, buildid thoroughly by John Tame and Edmunde Tame.
The bakside whereof goith to the very Bridg of Fairford.
Fairford never florishid afore the Cumming of the Tames onto it.
John Tame began the fair new Chirch of Fairforde, and
Edmunde Tame finishid it.
[In Vol. iv., p. 30, amongst a quantity of miscellaneous notes
referring to all parts of England, is the following: — " Mr. Ferrars
told me that one of the Tames did make the fair Chirch of Fair-
ford a litle above S. Johns Bridge on Ise." In another set of
disjointed jottings, Vol. vi., p. 17, we find : — " The Elder House
of the Tames is at Stowel by Northleche in Glouc. shire. Mr.
Home of Oxfordshire dwelling by Langeley hath married this Tame
Doughter and Heir, and shaul have by her a 80. li. Lande by the
Yere. Syr Edmunde Tame of Fairford up by Crelcelade cam oute of
the House of Tame of Stowel, Tame that is now at Fairford hath
226 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
be maried a xii. Yere and hath no Childe. Wherefore be likeli-
hod Syr Humfre Stafford, Sun to old Staford of Northamptonshire
is likely to have the Landes of Tame of Fairforde. For he maried
his Sister. And so the name of the Tames is like sore to decay."]
Both John and Edmund ly buried in a Chappelle of the Noi'th-
side of Fairford Quier.
Epitaph : Joannis Tame.
Orate pro animabus Joannis Tame armigeri <fc Alicife uxoris
ejus, qui quidem Joannes obiit 8. die Mensis Maij, a0 D. 1500, d an0
regni Regis Henrici 7. 16° Et prcedicta Alicia obiit 20. die Mensis
Decembris, An° D. 1471.
Epitaph : Edmundi Tame.
Hie jaeet Edmundus Tame miles, Sf Agnes & Elizabeth uxores
ejus, qui quidem Edmundus obiit primo die Octobr. a° D. 1534. <&
a° regis Henr. 8. 26.
Fairford Water risith a 5. Miles North North West from Fair-
ford, and after rennith about a Mile lower thorough Welleford
Village, and about a Mile lower as it were betwixt Welleford and
S. John's Bridge goith into Isis.
The streame oilsis lyith from S. John's Bridge thus upward :
From S. John-Bridge to Lechlad more than half a Mile.
[Cricklade and other parts of Wilts follow.]
From Fairford to Pulton about a 2. Miles dim. Going out of
Fairford I passid over the Water, wher is a Bridg of 4. Stone
Arches.
[Account of Pulton Priory, Wilts, follows.]
Pulton-Hek about a Mile beneth Pulton goith at a Mille a litle
above Doimamney into Amney Streame.
From Pulton toward Amney Villag I passid over Amney Water,
and so to Amney Village, leving it on the right hand.
Amney Brook risith a litle above Amney Toune by North out
of a Rok: and goith a 3. Miles of or more to Douneamney, wher Syr
Antony Hungreford hath a fair House of Stone ripa ulter.
Amney goith into Isis a Mile beneth Dounamney again Xunne
Eiton in Wilshir.
From Pulton to Cireneestre a 4 Miles.
Lelaxd in Gloucestershire 227
CIRENCESTER.
Cirencestre stondith on Churne Ryver.
Churncestre caullid in Latine Coriminum.
Ther was afore the Conquest a fair and riche College of
Prebendaries in this Toune ; but of what Saxon's Foundation no
man can telle.
Henry the first made this College an Abbay of Chanons
Regulares, giving them the Landes of the Prebendaries totally,
and sum other Thinges. Rumbaldus, Chauncelar to King Edward
the Confessor, was Dene of this House, and buried in the Body of
the Chirch, as it apperith by the Epitaphy on his Tumbe.
The Est Parte of the Chirch of Cirencestre- Abbay shewith to
be of a very old Building. The West Part from the Transeptum
is but new Work to speke of. King Richard the first gave to
Cirencestre the Cortes and Perquisites of 7. Hundredes therabout
yn Glocestreshir.
The Landes of Cimicest re- Abbay litle augmentid sins the
Tyme of the Fundation by Henry the first.
There ly 2. Noble Men of S. Awandes buried withyn the
Presbyterie of Cirencestre- Abbay Chirch.
And there is buried the Hart of Sentia, wife to Eichard King
of Romains, and Erie of Comwalle.
Serlo first Abbate of Cirencestre.1
This Serlo made his Brother Prior of Bradene-stoke.
Ther were xxviij or xxix Abbates of Cirencestre after Serlo.
Mr Blake the last Abbate buildid 2. Fulling Milles at Ciren-
cestre that cost a 700. Markes of Mony. They be wonderfully
necessary, by cause the Toun standith alle by Clothing.
There hath bene 3. Paroche Chirchis in Cirencestre, whereof
S. Cecilia Chirch is clene down, it was of late but a Chapelle.
S. Laurence yet stondith, but as no Paroch Chirch. Ther be 2.
poor Almose Women endowid with Landes.
Ther is now but one Paroch Chirch in al Cirencestre : but that
is very fair.
The body of the Chirch is al new Work, to the which Ruthal,
Bishop of Duresme, borne and brought up in Cirencestre, promisid
much, but preventid with Deth gave nothing.
1 Marginal Note :— " Serlo Decanus Seve/iana1 Eccl. fit abbas Coriuitnsi*.
228 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
One Alice Aveling, Aunt to Bishop Ruihal by the Mother side,
gave an Hundreth Markes to the Building of the right goodly
Povche of the Paroch Chirch.
And UxithaU.es Mother contributid and other to the Perfor-
ment of it.
Alexander Necham, a great Clerk and Abbate of Cirencestre,
buried in the Entring of the Cloister of Wiccestre, entering out of
the Chirch into the Cloyster. King Henry the first made the
Hospital of S. John at Cirencestre. Cirencestre Toun hath but a
Bailife to govern there.
Cirencestre is yn Cotesicolde.
Cirencestre hath the most celebrate Market in al that Quarters
on Monday.
The way lyith this from Cirencestre to London:
To Fairford vj. Miles.
To Faringdon viij.
To Dorchestre v. Miles.
To London
[In Vol. v. pp. 64-5 are the following additional notes relating to Ciren-
cester.]
Cirecester, corruptely for Churnecestre, peraventure of Ptoleme
cawlled Coriminum, stondeth in a
Botom apon the Ryver of Churne. Be lyklehod yn times past
The Cumpace of the old Waul, cujits Guttes were made that Partes
pauca adhuc extant vestigia was nere of Churne Streame might come
hand ii Myles. A Man may yet walk- thorough the Cyte, and so to
ing on the Bank of Churne evidently returne to theyr great Botom.
percey ve the Cumpace of Fundation of
Towers sumtvme standing in the Waul, and nere to the Place
wher the right goodly Clothing Mylle was set up a late by the
Abbate was broken down the Ruine
of an old Tower toward making of The Soyle in the Stony
the Mylle Waulles, in the which Feeldes abowt Cirecestre is more
Place was fownd a quadrate Stone apt for Barle then Whete.
fawllen down afore, but broken in Therabowt as in Cotesxvold
aliquot frusta, wherin was a Romaine is smawl Plenty of Wood ex-
Inscription, of the which one scantly cept in few Places, kept of
letterd that saw yt told me that he necessite.
might perceyve Pont. Max. Among
Lelaxd in" Gloucestershire. 229
divers numismata fownd frequently there Dioclesian's be most
fairest. But I cannot adfirme the Inscription to have been dedi-
cate onto hym. In the Middes of the old Town in a Medow was
found a Flore de testellis versicoloribus, and by the Town nostris
lemporibus was fownd a broken Shank Bone of a Horse, the
Mouth closed with a Pegge, the which taken owt a Shepard
founde yt fillid minimis aryenteis. In the South Sowth West side
of the Waul be likelyhod hath bene a
Castel, or sum other great Building. .
Sum say that it was the
the Hilles and Diches yet remayne.
_. _ Place wher Sege was laide to
The Place is now a vv aren tor Conys, .
, , . , . , . . ,_ the Town, and not far thens is
and therm hath be townd Mennes
. a steepe rownd Biry like a
Bones, msolitce magmtudims, also to
Wind Myl Hill ext. mums caw-
sepulchres ex secto lapide. In one .
lied Grismundes Tower, tor
was a round Vessel of Leade covered.
Gusmundes Tower, as theie say.
and in it Ashes and Peaces of Bones.
More than iii. Parts of the old Town
is now goodly Medow Ground. The iiii. Part ys yet wel inhabi-
ted, having one Paroche Chirche very richely wrought, and an
Abbay of Blak Chanons fundatore Henrico primo. But there
afore was a great Chirch of
Prebendaries. In the Body of the
Chirch in a sepulchre Crosse of White Ther is also a litle Chapel
Marble is this [Inscription,] Hie as an Alrnose House.
jacet Rembaldus presbyter, quondam
hujus ecclesice decanus, [et tempore Edwardi regis Anglice cancel-
larius.~\
[The itinerary, which was interrupted to interpolate these notes,
is now resumed.]
TETBURY AND BEYERSTONE.
Tetbyri is vij Miles from Malmesbyri, and is a praty Market
Toun.
Tetbyri liyth a 2. Miles on the lift Hand of from Fosse as Men
ride to Sodbyri.
Tebbyri was of later tymes the Moulbrays Lande.
A Castellet buildid by one of the Barkeleys of Spoyle that he
wan yn France. It standith aboute a Myle from Tettebyri.
(Note in the margin, " Beverstone Castelle).
230 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
Syr Wylliam Berkeley a very olde Knighte and Lorde of
Beverstane Castelle welle motid hath also a nother Maner Place
caullid Over a 4. Miles from Bright stow sumwhat on the right
Hond by the way from Brightstow to
Thomas Lorde Barkeley, as old Syr William Barkeley of Over
and Beverstane told me, was taken Prisoner in Fraunce, and after
recovering his Losses with Frenche Prisoners and at the Batail of
Poyters buildid after the Castell of Beverstane thoroughly, a Pile
at that tyme very preaty.
Mr. Wikes of Dodington contendith by sum reasons that the
Berkeley s of Dureslege wher of as olde an House or older then the
Barkeleys of Berkeley. But the Name of Berkeley Town and
Lordship of whom the Berkeleys wher caullid soundith to the
contrary.
There were Nunnes at Minchin Hampton in Glocestershir to-
warde Tettebyri.
Bremisfeld stondith in the Paroche of Estenhaul aboute a 2.
Miles from Ledebyri. Here is in the Clyving of an Hille a Cas-
telle having fair Towres It was the Beauchaumpes Lordes of
Bodington 4. Miles from Glocester. Tt was buildid by the Beau-
champs. Syr John Talbot of Grafton by Bromesgreve bowte it.
Ther is at Bodington 4. Miles North from Glocester a fair
Maner Place and a Parke. It cam to one Rede, Servante to the
Lorde Beauchamp, that mai'ied his Lordes Doughter the eldest of
3. and the Redes have it stille. [Vol. vi. pp. 72 & seq.]
The Hed of Isis in Coteswalde risith about a Mile a this side
Tetbyri.
The Fosse way goith oute at Cirencestre, and so streachith by
a manifeste greate Creste to Soclbyri Market . . . Miles of, and so
to Bristoiv.
Coivberkele lyith by North West a vj. Miles from Cirencestre,
and there ys the Heckle of Coivberkeley-Stre&me.
Master Bridges hath a fair House at Coivberkele.
[His House caullid longid onto one Ferrares attainctid
for cummin" with King Richard the 3. onto the Felde of Bos-
worth, and so it was gyven to Bridges. Vol. vi. p. 72.]
Leland in Gloucestershire. 231
This Streame cummith a 3. Miles lower thorough Rencumbe
Park, and ther hath Sir Edmunde Tame a very fair House.
From Cirencestre to Malmesbyri viij. Miles.
First I roode about a Mile on Fosse, then I turnid on the lifte
Hand, and cam al by Champagne Grounde, fruteful of Corne and
Grasse, but very litle Wood.
[Leland then pursued his way to Malmesbury, Bath, Wells, &c. Whilst
at Bradford, he made a note of " the notable Stone Bridges apon Avon," of
which only the following concern this county.]
Bristow Bridge a 10. Miles lower (from Bath).
A 2. Miles above Bristoiv was a commune Trajectus by Bote,
wher was a Chapelle of S. Anne on the same side of Avon that
Bath stondith on, and heere was great Pilgrimage to S. Anne.
Vol. iv. ]). 73.
From Eovesham I passed a 6. or 7. Miles all by Champion
Ground in the Vale of Eovesham, being all or most part in Wor-
cestershire to Stanwey Village, standinge in the Bootes of the
Hills of Cotsivould.
The Vale of Eovesham is as it were for such an Angle the
Horreum of Worcester-shire, it is soe plentifull of Corne. It lyeth
from the Bipe of Avon to the Bootes of Cotstcould-HiUes.
There is in Stanwey {Com. Clone.) a fayre Mannour Place and
Lordship, at the East Ende of the Churche, of late belonging to
the Abbots of Teivkesbury, where he sometimes laye. Mr. Tracy
hath it now in Farme.
There cometh downe from East-South-East a Broket, that after
goeth to Todington streame.
From Stanwey a Mile to Didbroke, and a Mile beyond is
Hilly [Hayles]1 There cometh clown a Purle of Water from the
South syd of Hales Abbey,2 and goeth toward Todington Water
1 Leland's MS. of this tour is lost. There are two early transcripts, and
the important variations are given within brackets.
'-In Vol. v. p. 1. is found the following isolated entry, with the words
" Hayles Abbaye " in the margin : — An° D. 1251°. comummata eat ecclesia
cum dormitorio, claustro d; refectorio : expensis in operatio?iibux octo marcarum
millibus.
232 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
WINCHCOMB.
From Hales to Winchelscombe a Mile and an halfe by fayr plen-
tifull Hilles. The Towne of Winchelescombe {Com. Glouc.) standeth
from a litle Valley by East, and soe softly risith in length of one
principall Street into the West. The Towne of certaine, as it
appeareth in divers Places, and especially by South towardes
Sudeley-C&st\e, was walled ; and the Legend, or Life, of Kenelme
doth testifie the same.
There was a Fortresse or Castle right against the South syde
of St. Peter s, The Parish Church of Winchecombe, called of latter
dayes (as appeareth by Writinges in Winchecombe Abbey) Ivy-
Castle, now a place where a few poore Houses bee and Gardeins.
I thinke that the ould Buildinges of it fallinge into ruine, and
Ivy growinge in the Walles of it, caused it to be called by the
Name of Ivy-Castle.
The last Prior of Winchelescombe tould mee that he hath heard
that there was a Fort or Castle about the East-North-East Part
of the Towne of Winchelscombe.
Kenelphus, Kinge of the Merches, had a Pallace in this Towne,
and first builded a famous Abbey in it, and dedicated it with a
glorious Solemnity. This Abbey was a 2. sundry tymes defaced
with Fyer and reedifyed.
Rich, de Kiddermister, the last Abbot savinge one, did great
Cost of the Church, and enclosed the Abbey towardes the Towne
with a rnaine Stone-Wall ex quadrato Saxo.
There laye buried in the East part of the Church of the Mon-
astery of Winchecombe, Kenelphus and Kenelmus, the Father and
Sonne, both Kinges of Merches. There laye in St. Nicholas Chap-
pell at the East Ende of the High Aulter on Hen. Boteler, that
covered the Body of the Church of the Monastery with Lead.
This Boteler was of the House of the Botelers of Sudeley. There
laye other of the Botelers of Sudeley in the Church of the Monas-
tery. There was of ancient tyme a Church of St. Nicholas in the
East part of the Towne, decayed many Yeares since.
In K. Hen. 5. tyme, the Paroch Chyrch of the Towne was
kept in the Body of the Church of the Monastery. But in K.
H. 6. tyme one William Winchecombe, Abbot of Winchelescombe
Lelaxd ix Glottcestershire. 233
beganne with the Consent of the Towne a Paroch Church at the
West Encle of the Abbey, where of ould tyme had beene and then
was a litle Chappell of St. Pancrace.
Abbot William made the East Ende of the Church. The
Parishoners had gathered a 200Z. and began the Body of the
Church ; but that Summe being not able to performe soe costly a
Worke Rafe Boteler Lord Sudeley helped them and finished the
Worke.
I marked in the South Isle of the Quire, first the Image of
Tho. Boteler Lord Sudeley. Then were there Images of these his
Sonnes followinge, John, William, Thomas and Rafe, and an Image
(as I take it) of Elizabeth Wife to Rafe L, Sudeley. There was
alsoe, in the Glasse Windowes in the North Isle of the Quire
Images of 4. Gentlewomen, whereof one was name Alicia, Da. to
Tho. Boteler L. Sudeley.
The Parish Church is dedicated to St. Peter.
There was once an Hospitall in the Towne, but now the Name
onely of Spittle remaineth.
The Brooke that cometh downe by the South Part of the
Towne is commonly called Esteburne. It risith about 3. Miles
above the Towne by West, and soe runneth by East to the very
Bottome of the Towne of Winchecombe. Then it turneth somewhat
North to Todington, not 2. Miles of, and it goeth to the River of
Avon.
[In Vol. viii., pp. 98-9, are the following additional Winchcombe
Notes :
Averey Parson of Dene tolde me . . . that it aperithe by Seint
Kenelme's Legend that Winchelcombe was oppidum mnro cinctum.
And he saythe that the Towne Buyldinge was muche toward
Sudeley Castell, and that ther yet remayne sum Tokens of a Diche
and the Foundation of a Wall, and that ther be Tokens of an othar
Way up a praty way beyonde the highe Strete above the Churche
where the Farme of Corwedene is : so that of old tyme it was a
mighty large Towne.
The Monastery was set in the best Parte of all the Towne, and
hard by it where the Parioche Churche is was Kynge Kenulphe
Palace. Winchelcombe is set in the Rottes of Cotisivolde.
234 Transactions for the Ykar 1889-90.
The Ryver that cummythe as the old Towne stoode thorough
the Mydle of V/inchelcombe is comonly caulyd ther Grope cunte,
but aftar a litle benethe Todington , by the which it rennithe, it
changythe the Name, and aftar a this syde Eovesham at a litle
Village caullyd Ampton it rennythe into Avon. The Head of this
Rivar is a 2. Myles above Wynchelescombe in the Hill.
This Riveret cummythe within a Qwarter of a Myle of Hayles
Monasterie in the Valley under it.]
SUDELEY.
The Castle of Sudeley is about halfe a Mile from Winchecombe.
.... Boteler L. Sudeley made this Castle a fundamentis, and
when it was made it had the Price of all the Buildinges in those
Dayes. I read but of one L. Sudeley of the Botelers, and is Name
was Thomas, as it appeareth in the Glasse Windowes at Winche-
combe in St. Peter's Church. Therefore I take it that it was this
Ihomas that made the Castle. Yet did Mr. Tracy tell mee, that
Rafe Boteler builded the Castle ; but he shewed noe Authoribye,
why. Indeed Thomas had a Sonne called Uafe, sett as yongest in
order in the Glasse Windowes in St. Peter's Church.
The L. Sudeley that builded the Castle was a famous Man of
Warre in K. H. 5. and K. H. 6. Dayes, and was an Admirall (as
I have heard) on Sea ; whereupon it was supposed, and spoken,
that it was partly builded ex spoliis Gallorum ;l and some speake
of a Towre in it called Palmare's Toivre, that it should be made
of a Ransome of his.
One thinge was to be noted in this Castle, that part of the
Windowes of it were glased with Berall. There had beene a
Manour Place at Sudeley before the Building of the Castle, and
the plott is yet seene in Sudeley Parke where it stoode.
K. E. 4. bore noe good Will to the L. Sudeley, as a Man sus-
pected to be in heart K. H. 6. his Man ; whereupon by Complaints
he was attached, and going up to London he looked from the Hill
to Sudeley, and sayd, Sudeley Castle, thou crt a Traytor, not I.
After he made an honest Declaration, and sould his Castle of
Sudeley to K. E. 4.
1 This statement is repeated in nearly the same words in a stray note,
Vol. viii., p. 99.
From Winchelescombe to
Miles.
Leland in Gloucestershire. 235
Afterward K. H. 7. gave this Castle to his Uncle Jasper D. of
Bedford, or permitted him to have the use of it. Now it goeth to
mine, more pittye. The Trades of Todington were sett up by
Landes given them by the Botelers.
There runneth a praty Lake out of Sudeley Parke downe by
the Castle, and runneth into Esseburne Brooke, at the South syde
of Winchcombe.
Tewkesbury 7.
Cirencester 15.
Gloucester 12.
Southam 3.
by good Corne, Pasture, and Wood but somewhat Hilly. Southam
there dwell Sr. John Hodlestan, and hath builded a pretty Mannour
Place. He bought the Land of one Goodman.
[The following notes on Sudeley occur in Vol. viii.,pp. 31-2 :
The Lordeshipe of Sudeley in Glocestershire longed to the
Botelars that were Western Men.
One Rafe Boteler of Sudeley buylded the Castle of Sudeley
aboute the tyme of Henry the 6. and Edward the 4.
Butlar Lorde Sudley was emprisoned in Edwarde the 4. Dayes,
whereupon he resigned his Castle into the Hands of Kynge
Edward. This Castle cam after to Gaspar Duke of Bedforde that
kept Howshold in it.
The Hawle of Sudley Castle glased with rownd Beralls.
The Tracyes hold Todington Lordeshipe and othar Lands by the
Gyfte of the Botelers.]
CHELTENHAM.
To Chiltenham, a longe Towne havinge a Market. It belonged
to the Abbey of TewJeesburie, now to the Kinge. There is a Brooke
on the South syde of the Towne.
From Chiltenham to Gloucester 6. Miles all by lowe Groundes,
Corne, Pasture and Meadowe. All the Quarter is thereabout from
Winchcombe to Eovesham and to Tewkesburie, and all the Waye from
Chiltenham to Gloucester, and thence to Tewkesbury, and partly
from Gloucester on Severne Ripes to Newenham much lowe
Groundes, subject to all suddaine Risinge of Severne. Soe that
after Raine it is very foule to travaile in. I passed over 2. or 3.
small Lakes betwixt Chiltenham and Gloucester, and they resort to
Severne.
236 Transactions for thk Year 1S89-90.
GLOUCESTER.
The Towne of Gloucester is antient, well builded of Tymbre, and
large, and strongly defended with Walles, where it is not well
fortified with the deepe Streame of Severne Water. In the Wall
be 4. Gates by East, West, North and South, and soe beare the
Names ; but that the East-Gate is called Aillisgate,
The antient Castle standeth South on the Towne by Severne
left Ripe, whither Picardes and small Shippes come in almost by
the Castle. I lerned that the ould Key on Severne stood hard by
St. Osvmldes, and for strife betwixt the Towne and St. Osivaldes
House it was thence remooved. When the Key was by St. Osioaldes,
there was divers pretty Streetes that now be cleane decayed, as St.
Bride's Street, and Sylver Girdle Street. The truth is that those
Streets stood not most holesomely, and were subject to the raginge
Floodes of Severne, therefore Men desired more to inhabit in the
higher Places of the Towne. The Beauty of the Towne lyeth in
2. Crossing Streets, as the Gates of the Towne lye ; and at the
place of the Midle meetinge, or Quarters of these Streets is an
Aquseduct incallated [incastellid].
There be Suburbes without the East, North, and South
Gates. The Bridge onely with the Causey lyeth at the West
Gate. The Bridge that is on the cheife Arme of Severne, that
runneth hard by the Towne, is of 7. great Arches of Stone. There
is another a litle more West of it, that hath an Arch or 2, and
serveth at a time for a Ditch or Dreane of the Meades. A litle
way farther there is another Bridge, hard without the West Gate,
and this Bridge hath 5. great Arches. From this Bridge there
goeth a great Causey of Stone, forced up through the lowe Mea-
dowes of Severne by the length of a Quarter of a Myle. In this
Causey be divers double arched Bridges, to dreane the Meadowes
at Floodes. At the Encle of this Causey is a Bridge of 8. Arches
not yet finished.
Bell a Merchant of Gloucester now livinge [defunt] consider-
inge (sic) to a Common- Wealth Bridges and Causeys be, and to
the Towne of Gloucester hath geven x.li. Land by the Yeare to
the Maintenance of them.
Leland in Gloucestershire. 237
There are 11. Parish Churches in Gloucester Towne. In the
Suburbes is Eivines. I cannot surely tell whether this be one of
the eleven.
The Grey Fryers Colledge stood within the Towne not farre
from the South Gate. This place is now turned to a Brew-House.
One of the L. Berkeley s was Founder of it.
The Black Fryers Colledge stoocle within the Towne not farre
from the Castle Garth. K. Hen. 3. and Stephen Diiis de Harnes-
hull Miles were Founders thereof about 1239. This House is
made by one Bell a Drapering House.
The White Fryers Colledge stoode in the Suburbe without the
North-Gate. There is in the same North Suburbe somewhat
more by North an Hospitall for poor Folkes endowed with Landes
dedicate to St. Margaret. The Towneship hath the order of this.
There is another poore Hospitall of St. Mary Mag del en some-
what more by North than St. Margarettes. The Priory of
Lanthony was taken as a Founder there, and was wont to main-
taine it with a certaine Charity of Bread.
There is an Hospitall of St. Bartholomew a litle within the
West Gate. This Hospitall had once a Maister and 52. poore
Men, and now it hath a Maister and 32. poore Men and Women.
The B. of Worcester doth give this Hospitall. Some saye it was of
the Kinges Foundation. One Pancefoot, that was livinge in the
Mind of ould Men, is buried in the Chappell of this Hospitall.
Whitmaster a Suffragave now Ruler of this House raised this
Hospitall, that afore was very subject to the rising of Severne,
and builded a fayre Lodging for himselfe in the Hospitall.
Thinges excerpted out of certaine Writinges in the Wall of the
North Isle of the Body of the Cathedrall Church of Gloucester.
Osric, first under King and Lord of this Countyre, and the
Kinge of Northumberland, with the Licence of Ethelred K. of
March, first founded this Monastery an. drii. 681. Osric by the
Councell of Bosell, first Bishop of Worcester, put in Nunnes, and
maketh his Sister Kineburge Abbesse there.
The [Thre] Noble Women Kineburge, Eilburge, and Eva
Queenes of March onely Abbasses for the tyme of the Nunnes,
the which was 84. and 4. (sic) Yeares. The Nunnes were ban-
Vol. XIV. r
238 TRANSACTION'S FOR the Year 1889-90.
ished [ravyshedj and driven awaye by Warres betwixt K. Egbart
and the K. of Marches.
Barnidph K. of Marches bringeth in Seculer Canons and
Clerkes givinge Possessions and Liberties to them.
King Canute for ill livinge expelleth the Seculer Clerkes, and
by the Councell of Wolfstan B. of Worcester bringeth in Monkes.
Eldred B. of Worcester translated to Yorke taketh a great part
of the Landes of Gloucester Abbey to resedifie the Minster of
Yorke.
A Nobleman called Wolphine [Wolphire Lehie] for 7. Preists
killed had Penance to find perpetually 7. Monkes i\\Gloucester.
Thomas Archb. of Yorke restored the Landes to Gloucester the
which Mlredus Archb. of Yorke wrongfully did withhould.
William the Conquerour gave the Abbey of Gloucester decayed
to Serlo his Chaplaine. Serlo Monachus Scti. Michaelis in Nor-
mannia.
K. William the Conquerour an his Sonnes gave Possessions and
Liberties to the Abbey of Gloucester.
Sancta Arihla Virgin, martyred at Kington by Thornebury,
translated to this Monastary had done many Miracles.
Soger Lacy E. of Hereford, Roger L. Berkeley, Hugh de Portu,
Helias Giffard, Jo. Maungeant Canon of Hereford, were Monkes
in Gloucester.
The Quire and South-Isle of Gloucester-Church were made by
Oblations done at the Tombe by K. E. 2.
The Names of Noblemen buried in the Monas'ery of Gloucester.
Osfric, Founder of Gloucester- Ahhey , first laye in St. PetronelVs
Chappell, thence remoovecl into our Lady Chappell, and thence
remooved of late dayes, and layd under a fayre tombe of Stone
on the North syde of the High aulter. at the Foote of the Tombe
is this written in a Wall :
Osirus Rex jjrimus fundator hujus Monasterii. 681.
Robtus. Curthoise, sonne to K. William the Conquerour, lyeth in
the midle of the Presbitery. There is on his Tombe an Image of
Wood paynted, made longe since his Death.
K. 25. of Camarvan (or K. E. 2.) lyeth under a fayre Tombe
in an Arch at the Head of K. Osric Tombe.
Leland in Gloucestershire. 239
Serlo, Abbot of GLzicester, lyeth under a fayre Marble Tombe,
on the South syde of the Presbitery. There was of late taken
up a Crosse wrapped in a Bulles Hide under an Arch at the
Head of the Tombe of Edw. of Carnarvan, where Maherne, alias
Parke-, late Abbot of Gloucester made a Chappell to be buried in.
A Monke tould mee that it was the Corps of a Lady Countesse
of Pembroke.
Abbot Horton lyeth under a flatt Stone in the North Part of
the Transept of the Church.
Abbot Froucester lyeth in a Chappell at the South West Part
of the Quire.
Gamage a Kt. of Wales, and his Wife, lye in a Chappell in the
North East part of the Body of the Church.
These Inscriptions be written on the Walles of the Chapter-
House in the Cloyster of Gloucester.
Hie jacet Rogerus [Roger Lacy] Comes de Hereford.
Hicjacet Ricus Strongbowe films Gilberti Comitis de Pembroke.
Hie jacet Gualterus de Lacy.
Hie jacet Philippus de Foye miles.
Hicjacet Bernardus de Novo Mercatu.
Hicjacet Paganus de Cadurcis.
Hie jacet Adam de Cadurcis.
Hicjacet Robertus Curtois.
These notable thinges following I
Hanley \ learned of an ould Man, made lately
Farley 1 a Monke of Gloucester,
Horton ! Abbotts of Serlo reseddified Gloucester Abbey.
Sebroke I Glouc. Abbot Hanley and Farley made our
Froiicester(sic) 1 Lady Chappell, at the East End of
Morwent / the Church. Abbot Horton made the
North Part of the Crosse Isle. The
South Part of the Crosse Isle and much of the Presbitery Vault
was made by Oblations at the Tombe of K. E. 2.
Abbot Sebroke made a great Part of the exceedinge fayre and
square Towre in the Middest of the Church. This Towre is a
Pharos to all Partes about from the Hilles.
R 2
240 Transactions for the Year 1839-90.
Abbot Froncester (sic) made the Cloyster a right goodly and
sumptuous Peice of Worke.
Abbot Morwent newly erected the very West Ende of the
Church, and 2. Arches of the Body of the Church, one on each
syde, mindinge if he had lived to have made the whole Body of
the Church of like "Worke. He also made the stately and costly
Porch on the South syd of the Body of the Church.
One Osberne Celerer of Gloucester made of late a fayre new
Tower or Gate-House at the South West Part of the Abbey
Cemiterye.
These fayre Villes or Mannour Places belonge to the Abbot
of Gloucester.
Prinknesse on an Hill, where is a fayre Parke 3. Miles from
Gloucester by East.
Dineyard [Vineyard] a goodly House on an Hillet at the
Cawsey End at Gloucester by West.
Hartlebury 4. Miles by North- West from Gloucester.
Froncester, where sometimes was a Colledge of Prebendaries,
suppressed and given to Gloucester Abbey distant from Gloucester
8 Miles, and standeth a Mile beyond Standley Priory. The Kinge
hath it now. It is an 100. m. by the Yeare.
Bromefeild, where sometimes was a litle Colledge, since impro-
priate to the Abbey of Gloucester, a 2. Miles from Ludlowe.
The following additional Notes on Gloucester Cathedral are from
Vol. viii., p. 32 et sea.
Ex inscriptionibus in occidental! parte Glocester Churche.
Osricus rex primus fundator of that Monastary in Anno Domini
dclxxxi. for Nuns.
Saynt Arild Virgin, martired at Kinton ny to Thorriberye by
one Muncius a Tiraunt, who cut of hir Hcade becawse she would
not consent to lye withe hym. She was translatyd to this Monas-
terye, and hathe done great Miracles.
The great Southe Ysle of Gloucestar Churche was made by
Oblations done at the Tombe of Kynge Edward the Second.
Pvoger Lacye Erie of Hereford.
Roger Lord Berkley.
Leland in Gloucestershire. 241
Hugo de Porta. Uelias Giffard.
Master John Mangeant, Chanon of Herford wer Monks of Glou-
cestar.
Bernidf, Kynge of Merche, bringethe in Seculer Chanons and
Clerks, gyvynge Pocessions and Lyberties to them.
Kynge Canute for ill lyvynge expellyd Seculer Clerks, and by
the Counsell of Wolstane Byshope of Wurcestar bringethe in
Monkes.
Aldred Byshope of Worcester-, transladyd to Yorke, takynge a
great Parte of the Lands of Glocestar to reedyfie the same.
A noble Lord, callyd Wolphin Lehie, for 7. Pristes kylled, had
Penaunce to find 7. Monks at Glocestar.
William Conquerar gave Glocestar Abbay decayed to his Chap-
len Serlo.
Osrik first under Kynge and Lorde of this Contrie, and the
Kynge of Nor thumb erland, with the Licens of Ethelrede, Kynge
of Mercia, first foundyd this Monasterye.
Osrike by the Counsell of Bosel firste Byshope of Worcester,
putteth in Nunes, and makethe Kineburge his Sister Abbes.
3. Noble Women, Kineburge, Edburge, and Eva Queues of
Merchie, and only Abbesses for the tymes of Nunes, the which
was 84. Yeres. The Nunes wer ravyshed and dryven away by
Warres betwixt Egbert and Kynge of the Marche.
Albredus, B. of Wircestar, dedicated the Church of Glocestar,
whiche he had builded from the Foundation to S. Petar, and by
the Kyng's Licens obteyned, constituted Wulstan Abbot there.
Kynge William Conquerar gave, and his Sonns also, Liberties
and Pocessions to the Monastarie of Glocestar.
Thomas Archebyshope of Yorke restoryd the Land, the whiche
Aldrede wrongfully dyd withhold.
Mauley and Farley Abbats made owr Lady Chapell.
Hirton Abbas made the Northe Syde of the Crosse Isle.
The Sowthe Syde of the Crosse Isle made by Offeryngs at the
Tombe of Kynge Edward the 2.
Abbote Sebroke made a great Peace of the Belle Towre in the
midle of the Quiere.
242 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
Abbate Troncester (sic) buryed at the West Encle of the Quiere
made the Cloistar.
Abbate Morwent made the new West Ende of the Churche,
and the goodly Porche by North.
Gamage a Knight of Wales and his Wife wer buried at the
Southe West Side witheout the Qwere.
Osburne Celerer made a late a sqware Towre by Northe W'est
the Churche Yarde in Abbate Malveme, alias Parker's tyine.
Robert Curthose is buried in the Presbitere.
Some thinke that Stranbowe's Wif Countis of Pembroke lay
where Abbot Malvern had his Tombe.
Sudeley Castell sold to Kynge Edwarde the 4.1
From Winchelescombe to Twekesbyrie 7.Myles.
To Worcester 14 Mils.
To Cirencester 15 Miles.
To Glocester xii. Myles.
To Southam 3. Mils.
Sowtliam longed to one Goodman, nowe to Hudelstan.
From Southam to Chilteham Market 5. Miles. It longed to
Tcwhesberye. a Broke. 2. Brokes more.
To Glocestar vi. Miles.
In Gloucester ar 11. Pariche Churches. Seint Ewines without
the Suburbe. The Abbey Churche. Seint Oswalde. The Graye
K. Henry the 3. and and Blake Friers within the Towne. The White
Stephen de H hhus Frers. Seint Margaret, and Seint Magdalen's
Knight foundyd the Hospitales without the Towne. Seint Margaret's
Blake Frers anno Dom. bettar endewed. liartolome's Hospital beyond
1239. one of the Bridgs. 30. poore Folke. One Pounce-
Lorde Barkley foundyd volt lyethe in the Bodye of the Churche there,
the Whit Friers. a greate Benefactor to it.
vii. Arches in the first Bridge, one in a Gut Bridge beyond,
v. Arches in a Bridge upon a Pece of Severne. 4. in the Cawse. 3.
in a nother Place, beside othar viii. at the Ende.
1 Although this and the subsequent nine lines are interpolated in Leland's
notes on Gloucester, they are evidently memoranda made whilst at Winch-
comb,
Leland ix Gloucestershire. 243
Northe Gate. Ailes Gate by Est. South Gate. West Gate
beyonde the 2. first Bridges new builded. Lands given by Henry
the 8. Belle and othar Men to mayntayne the Cawsies and
Bridges and [at] Qlocester.
Howsys longginge to the Abbat of Glocestar.
Piulcenes 3. Miles of by Est with a goodly Parke.
The Vinyarde by West at the Cawsey's End.
Hartebyriby Northe West [4.] Miles of.
No Bridge on Sever ne byneth Glocestar.
Newenham Village 8. Miles bynethe Glocestar rijpa dextra in
the Forest of Dene. There the Watar at full Se is halfe a Myle
over. A 2. Myls lower the Water at full Se is a Myle more ovar.
BarJceley an 18. Miles from Glocestar, somewhat distaunt from
Severne.
Thomeberye a 22. Myles, not very farre from Severne on a Creke
goynge up to it.
From Glocestar to Bright stow 30. Myles by Land, 40. by Water
and more.
No Bridge from Gloucestar to Twexberye. Ther a Bridge.
To Avon a litle above the Towne.
Fowre Myles above Twclcexberye a Stone Bridge, but none on
Avon.
Inscriptiones in capitulo [Capta] Glocester eccle.
Hicjacet Richard Strongbowe films Gilberti Earle of Peubroke.
Hicjacet Philipus de Fox [Foye] miles.
Hie jacet Bernardus de Novo Mercato.
Hicjacet Paganus de Cadurcis.
Hicjacet Adam de Cadurcis.
Hicjacet Robertus Curtus.
Froncester a Lordshipe of a c. Marke a Yere 8. Miles from
Glocester, a Myle beyond Standeley Priory.
These Hoivses of Whit Monks were made and erectid of Houses of
a Beligion cawllid Fratres Grisei, an Order that was afore the
Conquest.
[after mentioning Build was and others].
Rogerus, Erie of Hereforde Founder of Flaxley in the Forest of
Deene. There was a Brother of Rogers Erie of Hereford that was
•244 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
kyllycl withe an Arow in Huntynge in the very Place where the
Abbay syns was made. There was a Table of this niatier hanggicl
up in the Abbay Churche of Flexeley. There was a Byshope of
Hereford that holp muche to the building of Flexley.
Vol. iv. p. 81 et sea:.
The Priory of St. Oswald stood North North West from Glou-
cestei Abbey upon Severne Ripe. Ethelredus E. of Marches and
Ethelfleda his Noble Wife, daughter to Fdiv. the first, afore the
Conquest, founded originally this House, instituting Prebendaries
in it, and thither translated from Bardney the Body of St. Oswald
K. of Northumberland, and there richly entombed it.
It chanced that soone after the Conquest a Blsh. of Lincolne,
great with the King, required other Jurisdiction or Landes in
Lindesey belonging to the Seate of York. For the King entreated
the Archbishop, being at that time also B. of Worcester. Where-
upon the B. of Yorhe desiringe the Kinge to have the Colledge of
St. Oswald impropriate to the Seate of Yorke, and soe he had.
Whereupon he practized with the Prebendaries of a new Founda-
tion, and that they should be Chanons Regular. Some were
content, some would not : but the B. brought his purpose to passe
by Power, and there instituted a House of Chanons Regular,
impropriatinge Benefices unto them and giving them Coyletts of
Land, reserving the goodly Landes to the Church of Yorke, that
at this tyme be yet possessed of it.
The House of Lantony, a famous Priory of late of Canons
Regular, stoode on the left Ripe of Severne, a litle beneath Glou-
cester. One Milo, E. of Hereford was Founder of this House, and
it first was but a Cell to Llanhancleney in Brecknockshire. This
Priory had goodly Landes, whereof a notable part was in Ireland.
There longid to this Priory many fayre Mannour Places.
Neicarke a pretty House of Stone hard by Lanthony ; Quadesley
a 3. Miles of ; Bokworth [Brochvorth] ; Barew.Ien in Cottesivould ;
Alverton by Severne a 3. Miles from Chepstowe [all thes belongyd
to Lantoney].
The River of Severne breaketh into 2. Amies in the Meadowes
a litle above Gloucester, whereoff the principall Arme striketh
Leland ix Gloucestershire. 245
hard by Gloucester Towne Syde, tlie other goeth through a great
Bridge at the West Encta of the Causey at Glouc. and a litle
beneath Lanthony Priory they meet together. This Isle or MeJi-
amnis betwixt these 2 Armes is all very goodly Meadowe Ground,
and that about Lantony, for Cheese there made is in great Price.
[In Vol. v., p. 64, are the following additional notes respecting
Gloucester : —
Glocestre where yt is not sufficiently defended by Severn ys
waulled. The Castel is of an wonderful old Building, but no Britons
Brykes yn yt, seel lapides plerunupue quadrati. Of al Partes of yt
the hy Tower in media area ys most strongest and auncient-
Withowt duplici fossa munitur. In the Towne be [xi] Paroche
Chirches. withowt Blak Monkes yn the Town. Blak Chanons
lately withowt.
An Arow shot withowt the Town toward Her ford ys a long
Bridge of Stone, under the which goeth a great Arme of Severne,
as I remembre, cawlled Oivseburne. Yt breketh owt of the great
Streame above the Town, and beneth yt goith againe into the
mayne Streame. The Curse of yt is abowt a Myle. So that it
insulateth a goodly Medow.]
There is noe Bridge on Severne beneath Gloucester. Neither
is there any Bridge on Severne above Gloucester, 'till the Towne-
lett of Upton a 11. or 12. Miles from Gloucester, whither at high
Tydes Severne Sea doth flowe.
There be fewe notable Buildinges on Severne betwixt Glou-
cester and A ust Cliff e where the Ferry is over Severne into the
Forrest of Dene.
Newhham, an uplandish Townelett in the Forrest of Dene on
the right Ripe of Severne, is an 8. Miles beneath Gloucester.
There at a full Sea Severne is halfe a Mile of Breadth.
A 2. Miles lower Severne is at a full Sea a 2 Miles and an
half over, and at Aust Cliffe 2. good Miles over.
Berkeley an 18. Miles from Gloucester somewhat distant from
the Severne Shore.
Thornbury a 22 Miles from Gloucester, and a 4. Miles above
Aust not very farre from Severne Shore. There cometh a Creeke
up by the Marishes from Severne to Thornebury.
246 Transactions for the Year 18S9-90.
From Gloucester to
Tewkesbury 7.
Cirencester 18
Monmouth 20 [26] Miles.
Neivent 6
Bristowe 30
FOREST OF DENE.
As soon as I passed over the Arme of Severne at the West
End of Gloucester I entred into the Forrest of Bene, the which
thence downeward alonge Severne unto the Mouth of Wye River,
(where it goeth into Severne) and on the other parte again from
Monmouth to the Poynt of Wye is devided from Wales by the
left Ripe of Wye River.
The Soyle of the Forrest of Bene for the most part is more
fruitfull of Woode and Grasse then of Corne, and yet there is
good Corne sufficient for the Inhabitants of it. The Ground is
fruitfull of Iron Mines, and divers Forges be there to make Iron.
Flaxley Abbey of White Mov.Jces stood in Dene Forrest a 5. or
6. Miles from Gloucester.
Mr. Bainham dwelleth at Westbury in the Forrest of Dene 6.
Miles from Gloucester.
(Leland then proceeds to describe Hereford).
There is noe Bridge beneath Hereford on Wye, untill a litle
above the Confluence of Wye and Mone River .... There is noe
Bridge on Wiye beneath Monmouth to the very Mouth of Wye.
There was one of Tymbre at Chepstowe.
Vol. v., pp. 1, 2, 5.
Pinolce Welle a Mile from Hayles
7. ... 7 „ 77 __ Pinoke Wei is counted ot
m radicwus de Loteswoule to N anion
_... ii.i sum for one of the farthest of
Village, to Burton, and sumwhat be-
Tcimisc Heddes.
neth Burton cummith into hit a Water
rising at Kensdale in Coteswahl, and thens to Hinchwike, wher-
abowt yt rennith undre the Grounde ; thens to Swelle Village by
Stoiv ; from £ tuelle to Slawyhter, and so into Burton Water.
Cumming from Chiping Norton to Stow in the Wold abowt the
middle way is Adelsthorp and Horse Bridge by wher is a limes
betwixt
Leland in Gloucestershire. 247
Market Toivnes in the Wolde of Glocestreshire.
Stoic in the Wolde v. Miles from Chipping Northton and vii. or
viii. from Heyles.
Camden a vii. Northwest from Stow.
Northlache a vii Miles from Stoio [Towne]1 Southwest from
Stow almost in the Way from Stow to Cicestre.
Cicestre.
Tetbirl
Cheltnam a Mai'ket Toun in the Vale [v.] Miles from Hayles
Abbaye.
Glocestre standith on a Brooke that goith into Severne.
Fairford, wher Mr. Tame dwellith, a vii. Miles from Korth-
lage.
Olney, alias Ainey, about Deorhirst in Glocester-shire. Dcor-
hurst yet remainith in Glocestreshire as a Celle to Tweksbiri. [see
post.]
Al the way that I rode betwixt Heyles and Pershore was meatly
here and ther woodid.
The Fery from Auste in Glocestreshire to a Village on the far-
ther Ripe of Severn, not far from S. Tereudacus 2 Chapel yn the
mouth of Wy Kyver, is a iii. Myles over.
p. 63, et sea.
Mar.cet Toivnes in Glocestreshire.
Glocestre.
Bristoxv.
Cirecestre.
Twehsbyri.
Castelles in Glocestreshire.
Glocestre.
Sadely by Winchelcumbe.
Cirecestre had a Casfcel by likelyhod.
Bristoiv Castel.
Byvers in Glocestreshire.
Severn.
Avon touchith at Twehsuiri.
Another Avon at Bristoiv.
>This portion of Leland's MSS. is much damaged by damp. The words
within brackets were supplied by Hearne from the transcript made by Stowe,
about 24 years after the author's death.
8 At p. 7 the chapel is called " S. Terendalces."
248 Transactions for the Year 18S9-90.
Isis risith a iii. Myles from Cireucestre not far from a Village
cawlled Eemble within half a Myle of the Fosse Way, betwixt
Circecestre and Bath. Thens it runneth to Latinelad a 4. [6.]
Myles of, and so to Grelcelad abowt a Myle lower, sone after
receyving Chum.
Chume at Cicester, proprie Chumcestre, a hard by Chestreton,
improprie pro Chimetown [Chilnertown]. The principal Hedde of
Churn risith at Coberle, where is the Hed Howse of Sir John
Bridges. It is a vii. Myles from Glocestre, and a five Myles or
more from Cirecestre by the which yt renneth, and thens a vi.
Myles [uno] infra Greklad milliari yt goith into Isis.
Wher as the very Heel of Isis ys in a great Somer Drought
apperith very litle or no Water, yet is the Stream servid with
many Ofspringes resorting to one Botom.
Communely thorough al Glocester shire there is good Plenty of
Corn, Pasture and Wood, saving at Coteswold wher the great
Flokkes of Sheepe be, and yet in sum places ther groweth fair
Corn.
[After some notes on Gloucester, Bristol and Cirencester, which will be
found under those heads, Leland proceeds : — ]
Cummyng from Glocester to Cirecestre almost yn the Myddle
Way betwyxt wher the Wood fayleth and Champayne Countery
toward Coteswold appereth, the faire old Way made by the Britons
ys very evidently seen, and so goeth as stray t as a Line to Cireces-
ter and fro thens to Bathe. But sum wold that the Way from
Cirecester to Bath should be the very Fosse, and the way betwyxt
Cirecestre toward Glocester to be an other of the iiii. Wayes made
by the Britons. The Abbat of Gircestre told me that abowt
Cirecestre should be crosse meating of al the iiii. Wayes.
At Litle Subbiri, alias Sodbiri, in Glocestreshire a xii. Miles
from Bristoio as yt were by North Est appereth on a Hille a
strong Camp of Menne of Warre cloble dichid. It is usid now to
be sowen by Mr Walche.
BRISTOL.
Bristow apon Avon a greate Cite, well waulled, having a fair
Castel. In yt is now, as I remembre, xviii. Paroche Chirches.
S. Augustines, Blak Chanons extra mcenia; ibique in magna area
Leland ix Gloucestershire. 249
sacellivm, in quo sepultus est S. Jordanus, unus ex discipulis Augus-
tini Angloruni apostoli. A Howse withowt the Waulles, as I
remembre, cawlled the Gauntes otherwise Bonhommes. [iiii] Howses
of Freres, of the wiche the White Freres Places ys very fair.
Avon Ryver abowt a Quarter of a Myle beneth the Towne in a
Medow casteth up a great Arme or Gut by the which the greater
Vessels as raiayne toppe Shippes cum up to the Towne. So that
Avon do Ih peninsulate the Towne, and Vessels may cum of [bothe]
Sides of yt. I marked not wel whither ther cam any fresch Water
from the Land to bete that Arme.
Avon goith into Severn at Kynges Rode iii. [Myles] beneth
[Bristoui] by Land, and [vi.] by Water.
In the Hilles about Bristow [Towne be] found litle Stones [of
divers Colours counterfetynge precious] Stones.
[In what appears to have been another journey from Bath to Bristol, Vol.
vii., p. 88, Leland writes : — ]
A litle above Bitton I passyd over a Brooke that at hand semid
to come from the Northe and to go into Avon by Southe.
Ther was a Bridge of 3. Arches of Stone ovar this litle Broke.
Thens to Hanham a bout 2. Miles.
There be dy vers Villages togethar caullyd Hanhams, but withe
a Difference. At this Hanham dwellythe one Ser John Newton in
a fayre olde Mannar Place of Stone caullyd Barrescourte.
[Leland records various " thyngs lernyd of Ser John Newton," but they
relate wholly to Somerset,]
The Forest of Kyngs Wodd cummythe just onto Barres-courte,
Mastar Newton's Howse.
[Antiqui limites Forests de Kinggeswod.
Furcce de Bristolle. Hunteforde prope Kinggeswood monaster.
Aqua de Severna. Le Rugwey super cilium montis de Sobbery
a
sicut se extend/it de Lontedone usque ad aquam de Alreleg.
Al the Wodde in the great Valley bytwene Sobbyri and
Kingeswood was caullid Honvoode. Vol. vi., p. 72.]
From Barrescourte onto Bristoiv a 3. Myles by Hilly and Stony
Ground withe Feren ovar growne in dyvers Placis.
250 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
1 he Site of Brightestow.
The Castle and moste parte of the Towne by North e stondithe
apon a Grownd metely eminent betwyxt the By vers of Avon and
Fraw, alias Frame.
There rysethe an Hill of an notable Highte in respecte of the
Plote of the Towne selfe from Fromebridge on so goythe up alonge
onto Seint Austins, alias the Trinitie, the Cathedrall Churche, and
there endithe.
Gates in the Waulls q/"Brightstow.
There be in sum Partes of the Towne doble Waulls, a Token
that the Towne hathe been augmentyd.
Newgate (as me thinkythe) is in the utar Waull by the Castle,
and a Chapelle over it. It is the Prison of the Citie.
S. John Gate. A Churche of eche syde of it. S. John Churche.
It is hard on the Northe Syd of it, and there be Cryptce.
S. Gils Gate be Southe West of the Key where Frome renithe.
S. Leonard's Gate and a Paroche Churche ovar it.
S. Nicholas Gate where is a Churchemm cryptis.
There [These 1] be the inner Gates of the old Towne cis Sabri-
nam as the Towne standithe in dextra ripa defluentis Avonse.
In the utter Waulls. Pety Gate. From Gate in the uttar
Waulls. Marsche Gate a reqione Avonce. The third is callyd
In the Waulle ultra pontem fy Avonam be 2. Gates. Radde-
clif Gate and Temple Gate ; and a greate Towre caullyd Toiver
harry s, at the very Ende of the Waulle in ipsa ripa Avonam e
regione pontis ad arcem supra Frai brachiolum.
The Castle of Brightestow.
The Ryver of Frome ran sumtyme from the Were by the
Castle, where now is a Stone Bridge doune by the Este Syde of
it ; and so doithe yet a litle Armelet of it brekynge out, and
almoste the hole Streme goithe by the Northe Syde of the Castle,
and there goithe by New Gate under an Arche.
In the Castle be 2. Cowrtes. In the utter Courte, as in the
Northe West Parte of it, is a great Dungeon Tower, made, as is
sayde, of Stone browght out of Cane in Normandye by the redde
Erie of Glocestar.
Lelaxd ix Gloucestershire. 251
A praty Churche and muche Logging in 2. area. On the
Sou the Syde of it a great Gate, a Stone Bridge, and 3. Bullewarks
in lava ripa ad ostium Frai.
There be many Towres yet standynge in bothe the Cowrtes ;
but all tendithe to ruine.
Paroche Church's within the Waulls of Brightstowe
cis Avonam.
S. Nicholas ; S. Leonard ; S. Lavrence ; S. John Papt. (sic)
Christe Churche, alias Trinitie ; S. Audoene ; S. Werborow ; Al
Haloices ; S. Marie Porte; S. Peter's; S. Stephane intra secunda
mamia.
Ultra Avonam.
S. Thomas apostolus.
Templum. Wher as now S. Lawrence Churche it was sume-
tyme a Churche, as it is sayde, S. Sep>ulchri, where was a Kunry.
And thereby in the same Lane dwellyd the Jewes, and theyr
Temple, or Sinagoge, is yet sene there, and now is a Ware Howse.
Paroche Churches in the Suburbs.
S. Philippics within cis Avonam Ford's Gate (sic) now procul ab
Avona.
S. Jacobiis by Brodemede Strete.
S. Nicholas (sic) Northe from Frome Gate in supercilio montis.
S. Angtistines a Paroche Churche on the Grene by the Cathe-
drale Churche.
The Paroche Churche of Seint Marks in the Gaunts.
Ultra Avonam.
Peddiffe longe pulcherr. omnium ecclesia.
Howses sumtyme of Eeligion in Bristow.
Fanum Augustini, nunc S. Trinitatis. luscriptio in porta-. Pex
Henricus 2. ^ dominus Robertus ^j/ms Hardingi, filii regis Dacise,
hujus Monaster!)' primi fundatores.
Ther be 3. Tombes of the Barhleyes in the Southe Isle agayne
the Quiere.
Fanum S. Jacobi.
It standithe by Brode Meade by Northe from the Castle on an
Hilly Grownd, and the Ruines of it standithe hard buttynge to
the Este Ende of the Paroche Churche.
252 Transactions foe the Year 1889-90.
Robertus consul Cownte of Glocestarshire buryed in the Quiere
in the Mycldle of it in a Sepulchre of Gray Marble set up apon 6.
Pillers of a smaull Hethe. In his Tuinbe was found a Writynge in
Parchement concernynge the tyme of his Deathe, and what he
was. A Brewer in Bristow hathe this Writynge.
This S. James was a Celle to Twekesberye.
Non longe a dextra ripa Frai.
S Magdalene's a Howse of Nunes, suppressyd. on the Northe
Syde of the Towne. This Howse was suppressyd of late tymes,
when suche as were under 300. Marks of Rent by the Yere were
putte downe. Master Wiks dwellythe in this Howse.
The Gaunts.
One Henry Gawnt a Knight sometyme dwellynge not far from
Brandon Hill by Brightstow erectyd a College of Pristes withe a
Mastar on the Grene by Seint Augustines. And sone aftar he
chaungyd the first Foundation into a certeyne kynde of Religion,
and was Governowr of the Howse hymselfe, and lyethe buried in
the Vesturye undar a flate Stone. This had at the Desolucion
of the Howse 300. Marks of Land by the Yere. This Henry had
a Brothar cawlyd Ser Mawryce Gaivnte. He was Foundar of the
Blake Friers in Brightstow.
Hospitales in ru (ruin ?)
Fanum Barptholomaei.
Fanum 3m regum juxta Barptolomeanes extra Fromegate.
Aliud non procul in dextra ripa Frai qua iiur ad fanum
Jacobi in Lionsmede Strete.
One in Temple Strete.
An othar withe out Temple Gate.
An othar by Seint Thomas Strete.
S. John's by Radeclife.
An Hospitall S. Trinitatis hard within Lasford's Gate.
The Tukkers Hospitall in Temple.
The We vers Hospitall in Temple Strete.
Ther was an Hospitall of old tyme whereof late a Nunrye was
caullyd S. Margaret's.
The Grey Friers Howse was on the right Ripe of From Watar
not far from Seint Barptolomes Hospitall.
Leland in Gloucestershire. 253
The Black Friers stode a litle highar then the Grey on From
in the right Ripe of it. Ser Maurice Gaunt, elder Brothar to Ser
Henry Gaunt, Foundar of the Gauuts, was Foundar of this.
The White Friers stode on the right Pype of Frome agayn the
Key.
The Augustine Friers Howse was harde by the Temple Gate
withein it Northe Weste.
Chapels in and aboute Brightstow cis Avon.
The Bake Chapell by cawse it stoode by the Bake by Avon. It
longethe onto Seint Nicholas.
S. Georgis Chapell joyning to the Towne Howse.
A Chapell ovar the New Gate.
Owr Lady Chapell on Avon Bridge.
S. Sprites Chapell in Radclef Churche Yard. This ons a
Paroche afore the Buyldinge of Radclyfe grete new Churche.
S. Brandon 's Chapell, now defacyd, on Brandon Hill a Qwartar
of a Myle by West the Gaunts.
Bedemister a Mile out of the Towne by Est South Este is
now Mother Churche to Radeclife, to 8. Thomas within the Towne,
and Leighe without the Towne.
Bridges in Bristow.
The Create Bridge of i. Stone Arches ovar Avon.
Were Bridge on From hard by the Northe Est Parte of the
Castle of Bristowe.
There brekythe an Anne out of Frome a But Shot above Were
Bridge, and renithe thrwghe a Stone Bridge of one Great Arche,
and there by at New Gate the othar Parte of From reninge from
Were Bridge cummithe undar a nothar Stone, and serving the
Mille hard without New Gate metithe with the othar Arnie.
The Haven of Brightstow.
The Haven by Avon flowithe about a 2. Miles above Bright-
stoive Bridge.
Seint Anns Ferye is a bout Myle and halfe above the Towne of
Brightstowe.
The Shipps of olde tyine cam only by Avon to a Place caullyd
tlie Bek, where was and is Depthe enowghe of Watar ; but the
Vol. XIV s
254 Transactions for the Year 1SS9-90.
Botom is very stony and rughe sens by Polecye they trenchid
soniwhat a lofe by Northe West of the old Key on Avon anno
1247. and in continuance brynginge the Cowrse of From Byver
that way hathe made softe and whosy Harborow for grete Shipps.
Hunge Rode aboute a 3. Miles lower in the Haven then
Brightstow. At this Rode be some Howsys in dextra Avon ripa.
About a Myle lowere is Kyng's Mode, and there be also some
Howses in dextra ripa Avonre
Ther is a Place almoste agayne Hung Rode caulyd Portchestar,
where Hardynge and Robert his Sunne had a fayre Howse, and a
nothar in Brightstow Towne.
Sum thinke that a great Pece of the Depenes of the Haven
from S. Vincents to Hung Rode hathe be made by Hand. Sum
say that Shipps of very auncient tyme cam up to S. Stepkanes
Churche in Brightstow.
A Remembraunce of memorable Acts done in Brightstow, out
of a litle Boke of the Antiquities of the Howse of Calendaries in
Brightstow.
The Antiquities of the Calendaries were for the moste parte
brent by chaunce.
The Calendaries, otharwyse cawlyd the Gilde, or Fraternite of
the Clergie and Comonaltye of Brightstow, and it was firste kepte
in the Churche of the Trinitie, sens at Al Halows.
The Originall of this Fratemitie is out of mynd.
Ailarde Mean and Bitrick his Sunne Lords of Brightestow afore
the Conqueste.
Haymon Erie of Glocestar aftar the Conquest and Lorde of
Brightstow.
Robertus consul, Sunne to Hamon, was' Erie of Glocestar, and
Lorde of Brightstow, and Foundar of the Monasterye of Tewkes-
byry.
Robertus consul Lorde of Brightstow Castle, and Foundar of
S. James Priorie in the Northe Suburbe of Brightstow,.
Kynge Stephan toke the Towne of Brightstow by force from
Robertus consul.
In the tyme of Kynge Henry the 2. Robert Erie of Glocestar
(Bastard Sunn to Henry the First) and Robert Hardiuge translated
Leland in Gloucestershire. 255
the Fraternitie of_ the Calendaries from the Trinitie onto the
Churche of Al-Eallows. At this tyme were Scholes ordeyned in
Brightstow by them for the Conversion of the Jewes, and put in
the Ordre of the Calenderis and the Maior.
Hardinge foundyd the Monastery e of S. Augustine at Bright-
stow, and to it was appropriate the Churche of Al-Hallows.
Swalo Cardinale a Romaine Legate after the Coranation of
Henry the third at Glocester cam to Brightstow, and kept a Synode
there tempore Henrici Blesensis episcopi Wigorn.
William Erie of Glocestar, Founder of the Monasterye of
Cainesham, gave the Praefecture and Mastarshipe of the Schole
in Brightstow to Cainesham, and tooke it from the Calendaries.
Conducts in Bristow cis ptontem.
S. Johrfs hard by S. John's Gate.
The Key Pipe, with a very fair Castellet.
Al-Haloio Pipe hard by the Calendaries without a Castelle.
S. Nicholas Pipe withe a Castellet.
Ultra pontem.
Redclif Pipe with a Castlet hard by Redclife Churche withe
out the Gate.
An othar Pipe withe owte Radclif Gate havinge no Castelle.
Another by Porte Waulle withoute the Waulle.
Porte Waulle is the fairest Parte of the Towne Waulle.
The sayinge is that certein Bochers made a fair Peace of this
Waull ; and it is the highest and strongest Peace of all the Towne
Waulls.
The Yere of owr Lorde 1247. was the Trenche made and cast
of the Ryver from the Gybbe Taylor to the Key by the Comonlty
as well of Redclife Syde, as of the Towne of Bristoll ; and the
same tyme thinhabitants of Redclife were combined and incoi'-
peratyd to the forsayde Towne. And as for the Grouncle of Saynt
Augustins Syde of the Rivar it was geven and graunted to the
Comonalty of the sayde Towne by Ser William Bradstone then
beinge Abbot of the same Monastiry for certeyne Money therfore
payed to hym by the Comonaltye, as it apperithe by Writynge
s 2
256 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
therof made betwinge the Mayor and Comonalty, and the Abbot
and his Bretherne.1
1221. This Yere came the Frere Prechers first into England.
1225. This Yere on Saynt Boreheus [Bartholomew's] Day the
Frere Mynors came first into the Realme. Also a Man of Adder-
lay fayned hymselfe Christ, whiche was brought to Oxford, and
ther crucified.
This Yere beganne first the Order of the Augustine Friers in
England.
The Jew at Tewxbery. (sic)
1309. This Yere they made new Statuts in this Towne, and
they called the Senesters Baylifies of the Kings, and they pur-
chased new Ground to the Towne, and had new Prevylegis gyven
them of Kynge Edwarde.
The Almese Howse without Temple Yate is called Rogers
Magdalens of Nonuey whiche was Founder of it. And the Almese
Howse by Seynt Thomas Churche is called Burton's Alines Howse.
Burton Maior of the Towne and Founder is buried in it.
A nother Hospitall hard by the Greye Fryers:
And in Temple Streate.
One Shepward a Marchaunt of Bristow made the right highe
and costly Towre of S. Stephenes in Brightstow.
From Brightstow to Stoke levinge it on the lifte Hand a 3.
Mils or more by Grownd Wooddy and Forest, as of Kingeswod.
There is a Manor Place of the Barkeleys in Ruine, and a Parke
Waulle. Barkeley of the Courte is now Owner of it.
From thens by muche Forest and parteley bareinge Grownd a
2. Mils to Magngots Filde Village be lyke Ground. Here I saw
an olde Maner Place sumtyme longginge to the Blunts. Syns
Ilusey had it be bying for his Sune the Heire Generale. Then it
came to the Barkeleys by Purchace or Exchaunge.
\_Mogatesfelde, alias Magnusfelde, a smaul Lordeship. It was
ons withowte fayle a Nunnery. Parte of the Oloyster standithe
yet. It is now the Lord Barkeleys. vol. vi. p. 72]
1 This paragraph was copied by Leland from the Mayor's Kalendar, but
he has mistaken the date. " H. tercio xxiiij " of the original was, accord-
ing to civic reckoning, 1240-1. All the dates which follow are more or less
incorrect. Where the author obtained them docs not appear.
Lelaxd ix Gloucestershire. 257
A Mile farther by very Champaine, fruteful of Come and
Grasse, but somewhat scarce of Woode, to Coderinyton levinge it
by halfe a Mile on the lyfte Hand. There dwellyd a late at
Coderinyton a Gentleman of that Name.
From Coderinyton to Derham a Mile and halfe of, where
Mastar Dionise dwellithe havinge a fair Howse of Achelei Stones
and a Parke.
Thens a 2. Mils and halfe to Dodinyton, where Mastar Wykes
dwellythe and hathe welle restorid his Howse with fayre Buildings.
This Maner Place and Land longyd onto Barkels. It was pur-
chasyd, and now remaynithe to Wiks.
Vol. vi. p. 72.
[After stating {v. sup.) that part of Dursley castle was brought to make the
new house at Doddington, Leland adds : — ]
The olde Place of Dodinyton withyn the Mote by the new.
A Glasse with Bones yn a Sepulchre found by Dodinyton
Chirch yn the High Way. Pottes exceding finely nelyd and
florishid in the Romanes tymes diggid out of the Groundes in the
Feldes of Dodinyton.
A Yerthen Pott with Romayne Coynes found in Dodinyton
Felde.
Dodinyton longgid to the BarkeJeys.
Vol. vii. p. 96.
SODBURY.
Master WaJche dwellithe at Litle Sobbyrye a Mils from
Dodinyton. Thereby is a faire and large Campe with a doble
Dyke.
[Gilberte by Camallat maried one of Mr. Wcdsches Doughters.
Caines Heire of Devonshire a Man of aboute 300. Markes of
Lande maried a nother.
Clifordes Sun and Heire maried a nother. Vol. vi. p. 73.]
It apperithe by Record in Malmesbyri that Malmesbyry was
rewardyd for Service done in Battayle afore the Conquest at
Sodbyry Hill.
An othar Campe at orton but lesse.
The third by Derham Mastar Dionise Howse, and all towchinge
on one Hilly Creaste.
258 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
The 4. at Beketbyri a Mile and halfe frorne Alchrley.
Walche is Lord of Litle Sodbyri, and hath a fayr Place there
in the Syde of Sodbyry high Hill and a Parke.
Okie Sodbyri is a Mile from it, and there appere Ruines of an
olde Maner Place longynge as the Towne dyd to the Erie of War-
wike, now to the Kynge. To the Erles of Warwike logged (sic)
alias Chej.inge Sodbyry, a praty litle Market Towne and Thrwghe
Fayre to Brightstoiv. There is a Parke of the Kyngs by this
Towne, sumtyme the Wanciks. Litle Wood in full Light nigh
the Sowthe Partes of the Campaine Soile aboute Sodbyry. Ther
is a great Plentye by Southe Sodbyri of Wood in a large Valey
sumtyme thens clerely to Severn, lyinge in the Forest of Kyngs-
Wood. The crests of the Hilles that ly by Subbyri croketh one
way to Glocester.
From Chepinge Sobbyry onto Alder shy a clothinge Village,
where Mastar John Poynts dwellith beyng Lord of it. The
Chanseys were sumtyme Lords of it, as in Edward the third Dayes.
Kingeswodd stondithe low a good Mile from Alder sley.
The Ground betwixt enclosyd and metely welle woddyd. Some
Clothyars in it. els a litle and a bare Village.
Stones clerly fascioned lyke Cokills, and myghty Shells of
great Oysters, turned in to Stones founde in parte of the Hills
Este South Este off to Alderley.
The Course of Acton River.
This Brooke of sum is caullid Loden, but communely Laden,
and risith above Dodivgton, where Mastar Wiks Howse is, and so
to Acton, Mastar Voyntez House a 4. Myles of, and then toward
Brightstoiv takynge the Name of Frome.
There meate 2. Waters halfe a Myle by nethe Acton at a
Mylle.
Sobbyri Water cummithe from the Hills therby & re (sic.)
The Water by Alderley is in Evidence caullyd Avon, and goithe
to Barkeley.
WOTTON-UNDER-EDGE.
From Kyngs Woode to Wotton a praty Market Towne, welle
occupyed withe Clothiars havynge one faire longe Strete and welle
buyldyd in it ; and it stondithe cly vinge toward the Rotes of an
Hill.
LELAXlJ IX GLOUCESTERSHIRE. 259
There be Ruines of an olde Maner Place at Wottcm by the
Paroche Churche. It longgyd cms to the Berkeley s, and aftar onto
the Lords Lisles. Syns forceable recovery d of the Lord Berkeley
ther by sleinge the Lorde Lisle.
[There hath been a very great Campe of Menne of Warre on
an Hille now caullyd NeUey over growen with Wodde aboute the
my die Way betwixt Wotton Underege and Dersley but nerer to
Wotton. The Lord Lisle was slayn with an Arow by one James
Hiatte of the Forest of Beene yn Nebley Paroch.
Ther were Nunnes at Boxivel 2. Miles by Est from Wotton
Underedge, destroied, as sum say, by the Danes. It longid now to
the Abbay of Glocester. Vol. vi. pp. 73-4.]
DURSLEY.
Thens a 2. Myles and more by very hilly and woddy Ground
to Doursley, where is a praty Clothinge Towne stondinge on a
Pece of the Clyvinge of a Hill, privilegid a 9. Yers sens with a
Market. There is in the Towne selfe a goodly Springe, and is as
the principall Hedd of the Broke servynge the Tukkyng Miles
about the Towne. This Watar resortythe into Severne that is a
bout a 4. Myles of towchinge by the Way sume other Vilagis.
This Towne had a Castle in it sumtyme longinge to the Berkeley s,
syns to the Wiks, sens fell to Decay, and is cleane taken downe.
It had a metly good Dyche about it, and was for the moste parte
made of towfe Stone full of Pores and Holes lyke a Pumice.
There is a Quary of this Stone about Dursley. Yt will last very
longe.
[In some desultory notes, vol. vi. p. 12, are the following : —
Rogerus Berkeley de Drisilega Sunne maried with the Doughter
of Maurice [son of Robert Fitzhardinge ]
Drisilega, alias Dereslega, It was ons in the Foreste.
Part of Driselege Castel brought to make the newr House of
Dodington. A Quarre of Tophe Stone by Driselege, whereof much
of the Castelle was buildidj.
From Doursley to Torteworthe Vyllage, wher be some good
Clothiars. There rennithe a Broke. 1 take it to be the Brooke
that cummythe from Dursley, and that thens it goithe to Berkley
a 3. Miles lower. There is by the Paroche Churche of Tortivorth
a Maner Place, where Mastar Throgmerton dwellythe.
260 TRANSACTION'S FOR THF. YEAR 1889-90.
From Torteworthe to Wilts Watar a pratye clothinge Tounlet
2. Myles. The Lorcle Delaware is chefe Lorde of it.
Thens moste by Champaine Ground a 4. Myles on to Sodbery
Market that longyd withe the Village and the Maner Place of
Olde Sodbyrye onto the Erles of Warwike.
From Sodbery to Tormerton Village where Ser Edward Wade-
ham dwellythe.
Thens about a 4. Myles by playne Grownde onto Maschefeld.
This Lordshipe longyd to the Canons of Cainesham.
Thens a 4. Myles farthar I passyd by Hilly Grownde, and went
ovar a Stone Bridge, under the whiche ran a Broke that a litle
lower went in sight into Avon Byver by the right Ripe of it.
Thens by Hilly, Stony and Wooddy Ground a 3. Miles onto
Bradeford on the right Ripe of Avon.
[Some Wilts and Somerset notes follow.]
From Bathe to Tormerton 8 Mils all moste all by Champain
Ground.
Tormerton was the l)e la Rivers Lands, sins it descendid to
S. Loes. Olde Wadeham hath it by Mariage of one of the Ladyes
S. Clo (sic) for his lyfe tyme, the whiche was the last De la
Rivers Doughtar.
There lyeth buryed in the Body of the Paroche Churche of
Ihormerton one t'etrine De la Ryvers with a French e Epitaphie.
He was owner of the Lordshype of Tormerton.
From Thormerton to Sudbyry 2. Myles.
From thens to Acton 3. Myles by Woddy Grounde.
Dereham Village is a 2. Mils from Tormerton. There is a fayre
Maner Place longginge to Mastar Dionyse. The Lordeshipe of
auncient tyme longyd to the Russels. One John Russell and Eliza-
bcthe his Wyfe lyethe there buryed in the Paroche Churche ; but
they had but a meane Howse there. From them it cam by
Heyre Generall onto the Dionisies, of whom one Gilbert Dionise
was countyd as one of one (sic) of first that there possessyd. Then
cam Maurice, and he there buildyd a new Courte. And Ser Guliam
Dionise buildyd a nother Courte of late yeres.
The Dionysies hathe here a fayre Parke, and also a fayre
Lordshipe and a praty Howse a 2. Myles from Dereham at Siseton,
Lelanp in CtLottof.stf.rshtre. 261
and a nothar Manor and Place cawlyd Alnestone a 2. Myles from
Thornebyry.
Alverstone at the Deforestinge of the old Foreste of Ky>iges-
ivood was the Kyngs.
From Tormerton onto Acton 5. Myles, 2 Myles by Champaine,
and 3. by enclosyd Ground.
Acton Mannor Place standithe about a Quarter of a Myle from
the Village and Paroche Churche in a playne Grounde on a redde
Sandy Soyle. There is a goodly Howse and 2. Parks by the
Howse, one of Redd Dere, an othar of Fallow.
The Erles of Heriford were once Lords of Acton Lordshipe.
From Acton to Thome (sic) a 3. Myles or more by enclosyd
Ground and well wooddyd.
THORNBURY.
The Towne selfe of Thornebyry is set almoste apon an eqwalle
Grounde, beinge large to the Proporcion of the Letter Y, havinge
first one longe Strete and two Hornnes goynge owt of it. The
Lengthe of the Strete lyethe almoste from Northe to Sowthe. The
right Home of it lyethe towards the Weste, the othar towarde
the Sowthe. There is a Market kepte Wekely in the Towne. And
there is a Mayre and Privileges.
The Paroche Churche is in the Northe End of the Towne, a
fayre Pece of Worke. Whereof the hole savinge the Chaunsell
hathe be buildyd in hominum memoria.
There hathe bene good Clothing in Thornebyry, but now
Idelnes muche reynithe there.
There was of aunciente tyme a Maner Place, but of no great
Estimacion, hard by the Northe syde of the Paroche Churche.
Edward late Duke of Bukkyngeham likynge the Soyle aboute,
and the Site of the Howse, pullyd downe a greate Parte of the
olde Howse, and sette up magnificently in good squared Stone the
Southe Syde of it, and aecomplishyd the West Parte also withe a
right comely Gate-Howse to the first Soyle ; and so it stondithe
yet withe a Rofe forced for a tyme.
This Inscription on the Fronte of the Gate Howse : This Gate
ioos beyon in the Yere of owr horde God 1511. the 2. Yere of the
Reigne of Kynye Henry the viii. by me Edward Duke of Bukkyng-
ham, Erie of Hereford, Staforde and Northampton.
26-2 Transactions foe the Year 1S89-90.
The Dukes Worde :
Dorene savant.
The Foundation of a very spacious Base Courte was there
begon, and certeyne Gates, and Towres in it Castelle lyke. It is
of a iiii. or v. Yardes highe, and so remaynithe a Token of a noble
Peace of Worke purposid.
There was a Galery of Tymbre in the Bake Syde of the House
joyning to the Northe Syde of the Paroche Churche.
Edward Duke of Bukkyngham made a fayre Parke hard by the
Castle, and tooke muche faire Grownd in it very frutefull of Corne,
now fayr Launds for Coursynge. The Inhabytaunts cursyd the
Duke for thes Lands so inclosyd.
There cummith an Armelet of Severne ebbynge and flowyng
into this Parke. Duke Edward had thowght to have trenchyd
there, and to have browght it up to the Castle.
There was a Parke by the Maner of Thornebyry afore, and yet
is caullyd Morlewodde.
There was also afore Duke Edivzrd's tyme a Parke at Estewood
a Myle or more of : but Duke Edward at 2. tymes enlargyd it
to the Compace of 6. Myles not without many Curses of the poore
Tenaunts.
The Severne Se lyethe a Myle and more from Thornebyrie, the
Marches lyenge betwene.
From Thornebyry to Briyhtstow a 10. Myles.
From Thornebyry to Glocester 18. Myles, Sume caull it 20.
BERKELEY.
From Thornebyry to Berkeley a Market Towne, havynge a
Maior and Privelegis, a 4. Myles. A Myle or more or I came by
the Towne I lefte the New Parke withe a fayre Loge on the Hill
in it longinge on to Berkeley on the lifte Hand. And by a flyte
Shote or ever I cam on to the very Towne, standynge on a Clive,
I passyd over a Bridge, and there ran Forteworthe Ryver downe
on the lifte Hond to Severne Marches. And at the very enteringe
of the Towne I passyd over a nothar Bridge where ran a Broke
commynge from the Springs of clyvers Hills not far of ; and this
Broke in the Salte Meades a litle benethe the ToAvne meatithe the
othar Broke of Torteworthe Watar, and goo bothe withe in a Myle,
Leland ix Gloucestershire. 263
or there aboute, by the Salte Marsche and New Porte Havenet in
to Seveme.
The Towne of Berkeley is no great thynge, but it stanclyth
well, and in a very good Soyle. It hathe very muche occupied,
and yet some what dothe Clothinge.
[Sum say that there was a Nunnery at Berkeley. Vol. vi. p.
72.]
The Churche stondithe as on an Hille at the Southe Ende of
the Towne.
And the Castle stondithe at the Southe West End of the
Church. It is no great thinge. Dyvers Towres be in the
Compase of it. The Warde of the first Gate is metely stronge,
and a Bridge ovar a Dyche to it. There is a sqware Dongeon
Towre in the Castle, sed non stat in mole ejestce terrce.
Ther be dyvers Lordships there about longynge to Berkley to
the Some of 1000. Marks by the Yere, whereof Swynbome is one
of the best. There longe to Berkeley 4. Parks and 2. Chaces.
Okeley Parke hard by.
Whitwike.
New Parke.
Handle Parke.
Miche Wood Chace.
Vol. vi. p. 46.
Genealogia Berchelogorum.
Hardingus ex reyia, prosapia regni Dacise oriundus fuit in tem-
pore Gul. Conquestoris § Bristolliam inhabitavit a0 Dni 1069. postea
Dns de Berkeley.
An0 D. 1135. tempore Stephani regis Robertus filius Hardingi
genuit ex Eva sponsa sua quatour filios, videlicet Mauritium de
Barkeley, Robertum de Wer, Nicolaum de Tikenham, & Thomam
archidiaconum Wigorniensem Arc D. 1135.
An0 D. 1148. 3 Idus Apr. die videlicit Tsmchsej/undatio monas-
ter. S. Augustini Bristoll, & congregatio fratrum ejusdem per Dnm
Robertum /ilium Hardingi prcedicti.
An" D. 1170. die S. Agatha? Virginia obiit Ds. Robertus filius
Hardingi, miles, <k canonicus, ac fundator monaster. S. Augustini
Bristollire.
264 Tramsaotions for the Year 1889-90.
Mauritius primogenitus Roberti filii Hardingi ex Alicia sp>onsa,
filia Rogeri de Durslegh, genuit Robertum, Thomam, &, Mauritium.
Robertus primog. Mauritii habuit duas uxores, videlicit Luciam
& Lucianam, [Julianam 1] <k obiit sine herede de se exeunte, & sic
descendit hereditas Thomse fratri suo.
Thomas accepit in ux. Isabellam consanguineam regis Joannis,
& ex ea genuit Mauritium, Thomam & Robertum.
Iste rex Joannes habuit fratrem juniorem, scilicet Richardum
comitem Cornubise, regem Hierusalem ac regem Alemannise, qui
fuit pater Isabella? predictce, qui fundavit 4. Abbatias, scilicet
Ascheruge, Hailes & 2. alias.
Mauritiis primogenitus occisus erat apud Killingeworth.
Thomas f rater ejics successit ei, & accepit in ux. Joannara filiam
comitis de Ferreres, & genuit ex ea Mauritium, Thomam, Joannem,
& Jacobum.
Mauritius primogenitus Thomas accepit in ux. filiam Ivonis
Dni de la Zouche, & genuit ex ea Thomam, Mauritiam, Joannem
Yvonem & Petrurn.
Thomas primogenitus Mauritii accepit in ux. Margaretam, filiam
Rogeri de Mortimer, comitis de la Marche, & genuit ex ea Mauritium,
Thomam & Robertum. Morlua vero Margareta Thomas prcedictus
accepit in ux. Dominam qiue quondam uxor Petri le Veel.
Mauritius de Berkeley primogenitus Thomse accepit in tcx.
Elisabeth, filiam Hugonis de Spenser, & genuit ex ea Thomam,
Jacobum & Joannem. Obiit 6. Idus Jun. a0 D. 1359.
Thomas primogenitus Mauritii accepit in ux. Margaretam filiam
Wareni le Lisle, & genuit ex ea filiam unam nomine Elisabeth,
quam Richardus films comitis de Warwick accepit in uxorem.
Jacobus films Jacobi, filii Mauritii, successit Thomse, & accepit
in uxorem Isabellam, filiam ducis Northfolcise,t& habuit exea quatuor
ftlios, Gulielmum, Jacobum, Mauritium fy Thomam.
An0 D. 1347, die Martis 3. Cal. Jun. D. Thomas de Berkeley
desponsavit Dnd. Catarinam, nuper consortem Dl Petri le Veele,
filiam D' Joannis de Glifden [Clifdon] apud Charfeld.
An" Dnl 1348. 7. die Jun. in Festo Tran. S. Wolstani episcopi
natus est Thomas filius prcedicti I)1 Thomse ac Catarinse rt/wc/ Berkeley,
quern Wolstanus episcopus Wigorn. 4. a Nativitate die baptizavit.
Leland in Gloucestershire. 265
An" D. 1349. 27. die Maii natus est Mauritiis predicti Thomse
& Catarinpe filius apad Berkeley.
An0 D. 1350. 10. die mensis Julii natus est Edmundus ejusdem
Thompe & Catering filius.
An" D. 1351. 21° Jamjar.1 natus est Joannes prcedicti Thomae
d- Catarime filius apud Wotton Under Egge.
Ther was great Harte Burning betwixt the Lorde Berkeley and
the Lorde Lisle for the Maner of Wotton Under Egge, in so much
that they pointid to fight, and meting yn a Meclow at a Place
caullid Nebley, Berkeley's Archers sodainely shotte sore, and the
Lord Lisle lifteing up the Visar of his Helme was by an Archer
of the Forest of Dene shotte in at the Mouth and oute of the
Nek : and a few beside beyng slayn Lisle Menne fled : and Berkeley
with his Menne straite spoilid the Maner Place of Wotton, and
kepte the House. Berkeley favorid Henry the 6. Parte. Lisle
favorid Edwarde the 4.
Berkeley to wyn after Kinge Eduarde's good Wylle promisid
to make the Marquise of Dorset his Heire : but that succedid not.
Berkeley was ons a sure Frende to King Richard the 3.
Thus partid Berkeley from his Landes. First he was rather
winkid at then forgyven of the Death of the Lord Lisle. And he
beyng withoute Heires his Brother solde and dyd bargen for his
owne Sunne, Heire apparent to the Lands. Wherapon Lord
Berkeley in a Rage made King Henry the 7. his Heire for [moste
of his Lands,] and after was made a Marquise, and lyeth buried
in the Augustine Freres in London.
Vol. vii. p. 103.
From Berkley to Acton muche by Woody Ground a 7. Miles.
Thens to Cheping Sodbyri, and a Myle from thens to Lytic
Sodbyri.
The doble dichyd Campe there by on the Hill conteynithe a 2.
Acres. Kynge Edward the Fowrthe's Men kepte this Campe here
goinge to Twekesbyry Elide. Old Sodbyri and Chepinge Sodbyry
were the Erles of G'locester's Lands, and syns Bewchamp's Erles of
Warwyke. Gilbert de Clare pocessyd them.
1 Hearne adds "sic." But if the chronicler's year began on the 23th
March the difficulty is explained.
266 Transactions for the Year 1SS9-90.
The Maner Place stode harde by the West End of the Churche.
now clene downe.
[Badmanton Village a good Mile from Litle Sodbyri, wher in
remembraunce 3. of the Botelars of the House of Boteler Lord
Sudeley. Ther is meane Maner Place and a Parke. (In the
margin : — " Boteler a Man of a 180. li. Landes." Vol. vi. p. 73.]
From Litle Sodbyri onto Pulklechvrche in Glosestarshire a 4.
Myles ; one and a halfe by enclosyd Ground, the Resydwe by
Champaine, but frutefull. Here is a Parke and a goodly Lord-
shipe longynge unto the Bysshope of Bathe.
N.B.
EDMONDE the Elder King of England was slayn at Pulcle-
chirch, and byried at Glasteinbyri.
This is written with John Savaricus Bishop of Bathe, and
Leyland the Antiquary his owne Abbate of Glasteinbyri alienated
hand, who dyd 18. Apr. 1552. Pucklechirche from Glesteinbyri to
6. E. 6.2 Bathe.
The Personage of Pucklechirch impropriate to the 'Cathedrale
Chirche of Welles.
From Pucklechirch to Cainesham
There be 2. Bridges of Stone at Kainesham, wherof "one of 6.
greate Arches, now al yn ruine, standith holely in Glocestreslu'r.
The other hard therby stondith with 3. great Arches of Stone
over Avon Eyver that there partith Glocestershire and Somersetshir.
Vol. vi. p. 74.
Deirhurst in Glocestershir.
It standith as Severne Ryver cummith doune in Iceva ripa a
Mile beneth Theokcsbyri,
The site of the Towne, as it is now, is in a maner of a Medow.
So that when Severne much risith the Water cummith almoste
aboute the Towne.
Tt is to be supposid that it was of olde tyme lesse subjecte
to Waters, and that the Botom of Severne then deper withoute
Choking of Sandes dyd at Flouddes leste hurte.
'-' This nutc was written in the margin of the MS. by Mr. Burton.
Leland in Gloucestershire. 267
It is now but a poore Village, and the Lordship longgid of late
partely to the Abbate of Theokesbyri. Suche Parte as Westminstre
had was longging to Persore Abbay tyl William Conqueror gave it
away. Derehurst Abbay had the Residew afore that the House
of Derehurste was alienatid from the Monasterie of S. Dionise
by Parise, to the which it was a Celle, and one Hugo Magason a
Monke of S. Dionise was the laste Prior aliene there yn King
Edwanle the 4. Dayes, and aboute that tyme it was dissolvid, and
moste of the Landes of it given to Focleringey, and Eton College,
as it is said, had sum Title. After Sute betwixte the Colleges
and the Abbay of Theokesbyri Debatinges was, and after long
Tracte a final Ende made in Henry the 7. days that the Priory of
Goldeclife, longging then newly to Tcokesbyri, should go with the
Landes to Foderingey College, and Dehorhurst onto 7 heokesbyri.
Bede makith mention that yn his tyme there was a notable
Abbay at Derehurste. It was destroyed by the Danes. Werstanus
fledde thens, as it is sayde, to Maherne. The Frenclie Order was
an Erection syns the Conquest. The olde Priory stode Est from
Severn a Bow shotte, and North of the Town. There remayne yet
dyverse Names of Streates, as Fischar Streate, and other. But
the Buildinges of them be gone. Ther be yet 2. Fayres kept one
at eche day in iuventione Sf in exaltatione Crucis. There is a Parke
bytwixt the old Plotte of Holme Castelle and it, but it longgid to
Holme the Erles of Glocesters House, and not to it. There is a
fair Maner Place of Tymbre and Stone yn this Theokesbyri Parke
wher the Lord Edward Spensar lay, and late my Lady Mary.
Prestebyri.
Trestebyri is a praty Townelet standing There is a Quarre of
a Mile Este South Este from Cluiltenham yn fine stone aboute Preste-
Glocestershire. Sum say that it was of old byri, of the whiche Parte
tyme a Market Towne, and had Fraunchesis. of the fine Stone workes
It is now made a Market Toune agayne a 20. of Theokesbyri were build
yd.
Yeres syns. The Town hath been larger than it is now, and hath
be sumwhat defacid with Chaunce of Fier. The Erles of Glocester
were Lordcs of it. And Gilberte de Clare the sccunde Erie of
2(i8 Transactions for the Year 1SS9-90.
Glocester gave it to the Bisslioprike of Ilerforde for emendes of
Wronges to Cantulupe Bisshop of Hereforde and to his Chirche.
One Simon a Freholder, Servante to the redde Erie, having a
10. li. by Yere in the Lordship was bounde to wayte on the Bisshop
of Hereforde if he wente ynto Scoltelande. There is now a fair
House on that Grounde caullid Overton. It is now one Wylliam
Bagers, and is a Mile dim. oute of Prestbijri, but in the Paroche
of it. The Bisshope of Ilerforde is Lorde of the Towne, and hath
a.faire Place there at the Northe West Parte of the Town toward
Theokesbyri. The Place is well inotid, and standith withyn a
Quarter of a Mile of Southam. Master
Tetbyri (?) Castelle
Is a 2. Miles from Theokesbyri above it in ripa Icsva Salrinoz
apon a Cliv with doble Diches in the Paroche of Tioyniug. It is
now overgrowne with Trees and Busshes of Juniper. It longgid to
Winchelcumbe Abbay. Peradventure it was King Offa, or King
Kenulphus, House.
[Some Worcestershire notes follow.]
TEWKESBURY.
Ex libello de Antiquitate Theokebiriensis Monasterii.
Fundatio Monaster, de Theokesbyri a0 Di. 715. per duces Mer-
ciorum.
Temporibus Ethelredi, Kenredi, & Ethelbaldi regum Merciorum
faerunt Oddo & Doddo duces in Mercia.
Theocus Heremita mansiuncidam liabuit Sum say that Tlteocus
prope Sabrinam unde & Theokesbyria. Chapelle was aboute the
Oddo & Doddo hie construxere monaster- Place wher syns the
iolum in /undo suo prope Sabrinam in hono- Jues Synagoge was.
rem Dei & S. Maria? Assumpt* ubi 4. aut 5.
Monachos cam Priore posuerunt.
Dederunt Monasterio Stanewey cum membris.
Oddo & Doddo obierunt a0 D. 725.
Sepulti sunt Persorre in Monaster, suo.
Oddo ante obitum 7nonachus Persorensis.
Almaricus, /rater Oddonis & Doddonis, sepultus a/pud Deor-
hurste in parva capella contra portam Prioratus ejusdem. Ilaic
Leland in Gloucestershire. 2G9
capella aliqaando fait aida rejia. Ibi monstratur in diem hodier-
num ejus sepulchr/nn, ubi inpariete scribilur supra ostium: Hanc
aulam Dodo dux consecrari fecit in ecclesiam ad honorem, Beatae
Marise Virginia ob amorem fratris sui Almarici.
Strages,bella, & incerta imperiapene a morte Oddonis & Ddddonis
usque ad Athelstani monarchiam.
Incertum igitur quis Mis temporibus patroni fuerit Theokes-
byriensia Monasterii.
Theokesbiriense Monasterium bis Mis temporibus spoliatum
incensumque,
Ueddito sereniori tempore Hugo magmas dux floruit in Mercia,
patronus Frioratus de Theokesbyri a0. D.800. Quo a°.prcedicto sepe-
livit Brightricum regem Weat-Saxonum in prioratu suo de Theokea-
byri in Facello S. Ficlei.
Ob iit dux Hugo a0 D. 812. $f sepidtus est in eodem Prioratu.
AdJiuc apparel tumulus ad boream in navi ecclesioi.
An0. Di. 930. sub Eltheatano rege Ailwardus Meaw, sic dictus
ab albedine, ex prosapia regis Edwardi Seui ris, regis West Saxon-
uni, erat vir arm/is s'renuus.
Hie Ailwardus pro se §■ Algiva conjuge sua tempore Ethelredi
Sf Dunatani episcopi erexit parvum Monaster ium in honorem Dei, tf.
Maria?, 8f Barptolomasi in fundo suo apud Croneburne circa An.
Di. 980.
Alwardus obiit a°. Di 17. Calend. Januarii.
Ejus filius Algarus cum sua uxore Algiva jure hereditaria suc-
ccsserunt.
Algaro successit Brictricua : $r Mi ampliaverunt Monaster, de
Croneburne.
An0 D. 1066. Gulielmua dux Normann. acquisivit Angliam.
Robertus, juvenis, films Haymonis domini de Ascrevilla in
Normannia, venit in Angliam cum Gul. Conquestore.
Brictricua Imbassiator in Normannia refutavit vuptias Matildis,
postea uxoris Gul. Conquestoris.
Brictricus Dvs. Gloceatriaj captus in manerio suo de Hanleia, 8f
Wintoniam ductus : ubi sine liberis obiit.
Matildis regin% honorem Gloucestria; mortuo Brictrico accepit.
Obiit Matildia a°. D. 1083. mense Apr. Deinda, rex sibi servavit
honorem de Glocester.
Vol. XIV. t
270 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
Gulielmus Conquestor obiit a0. D. 1087.
Gul. Ruf us processu temporis declit honorem Gloucestrise Roberto
filio Haymonis cum omni libertate qua eum tenuit Brictricus.
Robert filius Haymonis ducit in uxorem Sibillam sororem
Roberti Belesrai comitis Salapise.
Genuit ex eafilias Mabiliam, Hawisiam, Ceciliam, Amiciam.
An0. D. 1102. Robertus filius Haymonis, exhortatione Sibillse
uxoris sues 8f Giraldi Abbatis de Corneburne, ecclesiam de Theokes-
byri ex novo fecit, $f novis possessionibus ditavit.
Robertus filius Haymonis, relictis tantum Priore 8f 2.fiatribus
in Corneburne, ceteros cum Giralclo Abbate transtulit una cum
prcediis Theokesbiriam, quam ex Prioralu in Abbatiam magnifice
extulit.
Robertus filius Haymonis obiit Id. Mart, a0 Di. 1107. Sf a0. 7.
Henrici primi, Sepidtus fait Theokesbirise in domo capitulari.
Postea per Robertum 3. Abbatem in ecclesiam translates est, 8f in
dextera parte coemiterii inter 2. columnas honorifice collocatus a0. D.
1-241.
Isabella uxor Roberti obiit 17. Gal. Januar. a0. D
An0 D. 1397. Thomas Pakare [Parkere]1 abbas 18. capellam
mirifici operis erigi fecit circa novum Roberti filii Haymonis
tumulum.
Henricus primus rex noluit honorem de Glocestre dividi inter
filias Roberti Haymonis.
Cecilia filia Roberti facta est Abbatissa de Shaftesbyri.
Hawisia Abbatissa de Wilton.
Amicia nupsit comiti Britannise.
Mabilia primogenita nupsit Roberto filio notho Henrici primi,
quern pater rex Henricus integro Jwnore de Glocestre insignivit.
Hie Robertus nothus wdificavit Prioratum S. Jacobi Bristollise,
Sr membrum fecit Monasterio de Theokesbyri.
Robertus nothus solebat singulis solennibus diebus habere secum
Abbatem de Theokesbyri cum 12. monachis Bristollia?.
Hie Robertus construxit castrum de Bristolle, fy dedit decimum
quemque lapidem castri ad fabricam capellce S. Maria? juxta monaster.
IS. Jacobi Bristollia?.
1 This and two or three other readings within brackets were obtained by
Hearne from the original MS. transcribed by Leland.
Leland in Gloucestershire. 271
Robertus obiit prid. Cal. Novembr. sub a°.D. 1140 [1147.] a°.
Stephani 12. Sepultus in clwro Monasterii S. Jacobi Bristollise.
Gulielmus ejus films successit. Buxit in uxorem Hawisiam^/iZ iam
comitis Leircestriae, genuitque ex ea Robertum qui ante patrem obiit.
Sepultus fuit Robertus in Abbatia de Cainesham, qioam Guliel-
mus ejus pater infilii sui Roberti memoriam erexerat.
Gulielmus etiam fdias genuit, videlicet Mabiliam, quai nupsit
comiti de Evereux in Normannia.
Almaricus filius Mabilia?, qui comitatum Glocestrise post mortem
Isabella? tempore regis Joannis paululum p>ossidens sine liberis cito
decessit. Alteram genuit filiam Gulielmus Amiciam nomine, quce
nupsit domino Richardo Clare comiti de Hertforde.
Tertiam quoque filiam nomine Isabellam genuit.
Henricus 2. detinuit in manu sua honorem de Glocestre 8. annis,
& anno ultimo regni sui dedit Isabellam in uxorem Joanni filio suo
cum int gro honore de Glocester, quern tenuit reqnante Richardo I.
ej us J'ratre.
Hie Joannes postea rex fecit pontem de Theokesbyri, qui vocatur
pons longus, tempore comitatus sui, Sf dedit ad sustentationem dicti
pentis to turn teloneum mercati de Twekesbyri quod usque hodie
servatur.
Joannes cum it no regnassit anno Isabellam, quia liberos non
habuit,repudiavit, retinens in manu sua honorem de Glocester, castrum
Bristollise cum Burgo, <& totam Ilundredam de Bertona cum per-
tinentiis quat non devenerunt ad heredes usque in prcesentem diem.
Joannes rex maritamt Isabellam Galfrido de Mandeville comiti
Essexise cum comiiatu Glocestrire. Galfredo Mandeville mortuo
Isabella tempore Joannis cum Ludovicus Gallus Angliam occuparet
nupsit Huberto de Burgo summo Angl. Justic'ario permissu regis
8f paulo post obiit.
Gulielmus comes Glocestr. obiit a° D. 1173. Sepultus fuit in
monaster io de Cainesham quam in Roberti filii sui memoriam
fundavit.
Hie Robertus (lulielmi filius natus fuit apud Cairdif, Sf ibidem
obiit a0. D. 1166.
Duab. filiabus Gulielmi comitis sine liberis morientibus devoluta
est hereditas ad Amiciam uxorem Richardi de Clare.
T 2
27'2 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
Richard us de Clare dbiit a0 U. 1211. 8f sepultus est apud Clare.
Successit Richardo Gilbei'tus ejus ex Amicia filius.
Hie Gilbertus primus Glocestrise fy Hertforclise comes conjunctiva
<£• divisim, qui accept a covjuge Isabella, filia Gulielmi Marescalli
senioris, comitis de Penbroke, genuit ex ea filiam nomine matris
Amiciara a°.B. 1220.
Gilbertus genuit ex Amicia uxore Richardum secundum heredem
suum a0 D. 1221. [mccxxii.]
Gilbertus postea genuit alios filios, Gulielmum & Gilbertum.
Gilbei'tus postremo genuit 2. filias, Agnetem & Isabellam.
Gilbertus primus legavit monaster, boscum Mutha dicitur in
de Mitha cum corpore suo ad sepeliendum in Bonationibus. Distat d,
medio presbyterii. Theoci cziria idtrapon-
An°. D. 1230. Gilbertus primus dbiit in tern 1000. passibus in
Britannia Minori. montis ad Sabrinae
Successit ei 2. Richardus ejus filius & lieres ripam.
comes de Glocester <& Herteforde. Comes Hertford.
Richardus 2. duxit in uxorem Matildem filiim comitis Lincoln-
iensis & genuit ex eafilium dictum Gilbertum secundum a0. D. 1243.
apud eccl. Cliristi in Hamptonshire.
Hie Gilbertus 2. dictus est Comes Rubeus, quia rufos erat <&
pulcher aspectu.
Cenuit etiam Gilbertus 2US. dtoos alios filios, Thomam 8f Bene-
dictum, & 3. filia*, Isabellam, Margaretam d- Roys.
Richardus de Clare secundus comes Glocestria; & Hertfordice
tenuit natalem Dni. a± ud Theokesbyri, & habuit secum 60. milites
servientes sibi.
Richardus 2. obiit 14. die Jul. anno Di. 1262. tempore Henrici
3. regis ante Statutem apud Esmerfeld : & sepultus est in presbyterio
Theokesbyrire ad dexteram patris sui.
Uxor ejus ornavt tumulum auro, anjento, & gemmis.
Gilbertus 2. successit patri Richardo in honorem comit. Glocestr.
& Hertfordire, & ex sua conjuge Joanna de Acris regis Edwardi I.
filia habuit /ilium unicum Gilbertum 3. & trcs filius, Elenoram,
Elizabeth & Isabellam.
Gilbertus 2. obiit in castcllo de Moncmuthe 7. [vi.] Id. Decembr.
an0 P. 1295. Sepultus est Theokesbyrite in sinistra Gilberti priini.
LELAND IN GLOUCESTERSHIRE. 273
Successit Gilbertus 3. qui de uxore sua Matilde, filia Joannis de
Brough comitis Ultonice, genuit Joannem raatura ante patrem morte.
prceventum.
Joannes sejmltus est Theokesbirise in capella S. Maria?.
Gilbertus 3. a Scottis apud Strivelyn ociisus est die S. Joannis
Baptist* an0. Edwardi 2. regis ... [vm.] a°. cetads 23. 8° Cat. Jul.
a0. D. 1314. Sepidtus est in Tewkesbyri ad hevarn patris sui.
Matildis uxor Gilberti 3. obiit a0. D. 1315°.
M01 tuo Gilberto comitatus Glocestrise & Herefordise dispersi sunt,
videlicet in 3. filias Gilberti secundi, sorores videlicet Gilberti 3.
Post mortem Gilberti 3. successit in 3 parte, & prima comit.
Glocestr. Elenora prima soror Gilberti 3.
Patronatus monaster, de Twekesbyri pervenit adhanc Elenorarn.
Hrec Elenora vmpta fait Hugoni le Dispenser, filio Hugonis
Spenser comitis Wintonise, <& genuit ex ea Hugonem 3. d Eduardum.
Hugo primus punitis in castello de Bristolle 6. Cal. Novembr.a?t°.
1326. Eodem anno in vigil lia S. Aulrefe apostoli Hugo 2. cumerarius
Eduardi 2. regis sine judicio & responsione suspensus est <b in
partes divisus, & in ecclesia de Theokesbyri diu posfea sepultus.
Obiit Elenora uxor Hugonis 2\ 2". Cal. Jul. An". D. 1337. Erat
mater Hugonis 3. Edwardi l1. & Gilberti ex Hugone 2°. Et post
obitum Hugonis 21. nupsit Dno. Gulielmo de la Zouchea0. D. 1335.
la Martii. [... Zouch: qui ex ilia genuit Hugonem Souche. Anno
diii mcccxxxv. primo Die Martii obiit Dominus Willmus le louche,
& sepultus est in capella beatre Maria Theokusburice in medio.']
Gul. de la Zouche maritus Elenorse sepultus apud Theokesbyri
in capella S. Marise.
Elisabeth cle Clare 2. filia Gilberti 2. & soror Alenorse habuit
3. viros, Joannem (sic) de Burgo corn-item de Holmestre, de rjuibus
Gulielnius genitus comes de Holuester. A quo Gulielmo Elizabeth
de Burgo hercs ejus, quavi Leonellus^ms 2. Edwardi 3. regis duxit
in uxorem. A quibus Leonello & Elisabeth filia processit nomine
Philippa heres unica.
[Pedigree of the Earls of March follows.]
Dna Isabella filia Gilberti 2. copxdata fuit Dno Hugoni de
Au dele.
Hugo Le Denspenser 3s. & 2'. films obiit sine herede ex uxore
Elisabeth, filia comitis Sarum, sexto Id. Febr. a0. D. 1348. Sepultus
est apud Theokesbyry juxta summum altare in dextera parte. Hie
appropriavit ecclesiam Latrissancte [Lantessan] monaster. Theokes-
byryensi. Iste /regit Scheltram in mare in. hello de Scluse a0. D.
1359.
274 Trans actions for the Year 1SS9-90.
Elisabeth le Despenser uxor Hugonis 3. obiit apud Asscheley
in comitatu Hamptonise. Sepulta est juxta Hugonem maritum apud
Theokesbyry. Edwardus le Dispenser frater Hugonis 3, genuit ex
Anna filia D[. de Ferrares Edwardum 2ni. Thomam, Henricum, &
Gilbertum secundum, &foriuna belli ante fratrem decessit. Edwardus
vero 2. filius istius Edwardi s^lccessit Hugoni 3°. Duxit in uxorem
Elisabetham filiam Dm. Bartolemei de Burwasclie, Sf genuit ex
ea Eduardum 3. qui obiit duodennis apud Cairdif, sed Tlieoksbirise
sepelitur in capella S. Maria3 : & Hugonem 4. qui post natalem diem
cito obiit, & cum Edwaixlo 3. sepultus est. Veinde genuit 4. filias,
Ceciliam, quce juvencula admodem obiit, & sepidta est cum fratribus
suis. Deinde Elisabeth, quce postea Dnd de la Zouche, & relicta
Joannis Arundelle : & Annam, quce fuit desponsata Hugoni Hast-
inges,&postea Thomse Moreley: & Margaretam quce habuit Robertum
Ferreres.
Prcedictus Edwardus in ultima cetate sua genuit Thomam Dis-
pensar, postea comitem Glocestrise.
Hie Thomas successit patri in hereditate, & Constantiam, filiam
Edmundi de Langeley filii Eduardi 3. in uxorem accepit, ex qua
genuit Richardum, Elisabeth, & Isabellam.
Prcedictus Edwardus 2s. obiit in Cambria apud castrum de
Lanblethiam die S. Martini episcopi a°. D. 1375.
Sepultus est Edwardus 2s. apud Theokesbyry ante ostium vestiarii
jux'ta presbyterium.
Uxor Edwardi 2. cedificavit pro tumulo viri sui capellam S. Trini-
tatis apud Theokesbyry. Dedit hie calicem aureum monaster, de
Theokesbyri. Permansit viduitate Elisabeth filia Dm Burwasche
33. annis. Obiit a0. D. 1409. Sepulta est infra chorum de Theokes-
byri.
capite punitus
Thomas filius Eduardi Le Dispensar secundi & heres interfectus
Bristollia? a popxdari vulgo feria 3. ])ost festum S. Hilarii a0. D.
1369 [mcccxcix], Sepidtusest Theokesbyri. Obiit decern annis ante
onatrem suam a°. D. 1414.
Obiit Ds Richardus Le Dispensar 3. filius & heres ejus anno
cvtatis 18. apud Merton cum adhuc esset in cuslodia regia. Sepultus
est apud Theokesbyri in sinistra patris sui.
Post obitum Din Richardi Le Dispensar Isabella soror ejus sus-
cepit dominium de Dispenseris. Quam desponsavit Dns Richardus
de Bello Campo, filius & heres Dm. Guliehni Beauchamp Sf dns de
Abergeveney die 7. Dormientium An°. D. 1411°.
LELAND IX GLOrCESTRHSHITiK. 27")
[Pedigree of the Beauchamps follows. The following are the only passages
of local interest : — ]
Henricus comes de Warwike ab Henrico 6. cui charissimus erat,
coronatus in regem de Wighte, & postea nom hiatus primus comes
totius Anglise.
Dedit etiam ei castrum Bristollia} cum omnibus annexis, quod
olim. rex Joannes detinuit sibi.
Obiit Dns Henricus Warwik primus comes Anglian, Dns Le
Despenser, & de Abergevenny, rex de insvlis Wiethe, Gardesey 8f
Jardesey, Dns quoque castri Bristollise cum suis annexis iii. Id. Jun.
a0. D. 1446. cetatis sum 22°. apud castrum de Hanleia. Sepultus est
Theokesbyrire in choro.
Anna unica filia Henrici ... obiit a°. D. 1449. an0 cetatis sua> 6.
Mortua Anna filia Henrici Patronatus rnonasterii de Theokes-
biry devenit ad Richardum Neville 6. filium Richardi Neville
comitis Sarum, qui duxit Annara filiam Richardi Beauchamp 51.
comMs Warwike & Isabellas uxoris siue & comitissce & soror Henrici.
Henricus sextus rex dedit Richardo Neville comitatum War-
wik & dominium de Le Dispenser atque de Abergevenny sub
sigillo mag. chartoz suce.
[An account of the King Maker's descendants follows.]
An0. D. 1476. obiit Isabella ducissa Clarentia? patrona de
Tewkesbyri. Septdta est apud Theokesbyri.
An0. D\ 1470 belhcm fuit apud Barnet in die Pasche mane, tibi
Dns de Boucher occisus ex parte Edwardi.
Ex altera parte Richard Neville comes Warwik & frater ejus
Joannes Neville inter fecti sunt.
Eodem anno 3. No. Maii Edwardus Princeps Henrici 6. filius
venit cum exercitu ad Theokesbyri, & intravit campum nomine
Gastum.
Princeps Edwardus ibi occisus.
Fugientes occisi in ecclesia de Theokesbyri.
Nomina occisorum in bello Gastiensi prope Theokesbyri.
Edwardus jyrinceps sepultus est in monasterio de Theokesbiri.
Dns Eclmundus dux Somerset captus 8f decollatus ac ibidem
sepultus.
Dns Joannes de Somerset, frater Edmundi ditcis, ibid, sepult.
Thomas Courteney comes Devonise ibidem sejndtus.
Dns de Wenlok cujus corpus alio ad sepidturam travslatum est.
276 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
Humfredus Handeley decapitatus cum Thoma Courteney, Sf
una cum eo sepultus.
Edmundus Hauarde miles.
Gulielmus Wichingham miles.
Joannes Delves senior occisus campo & Joannes Delves ejus
fi'ius decapitatus ibidem, una sepulti, alio postea translati.
Joannes Leukenor miles occisus campo & pi-ope Delvios sepultus.
Gul. Yaulz miles campo occisus Sf ibidem sepultus.
Gervasius Clifton captus & decollatus ac ibid, sepidtus.
Gul. Car Sf Henricus Ros milites capti Sf decapitati. Sepulti
in coemiterio de Theokesbyri.
Thomas Tressam miles captus Sf decapitatus ac ibidem sepultus.
Gul. Lirmouthe, Joannes Urinan, Thomas Semar, Gul. Rowys
milites campo occisi Sf ibidem sepulti in coemiterio.
Gul. Newborow miles captus Sf decollatus, ac ibidem sepultus.
Henricus Wateley armiger occisus Sf ibidem sepidtus.
Henricus Barow armiger occisus & ibidem sepultus.
Felding armiger occisus & ibidem sepultus.
Joannes Gower ensiger principis Eduardi, Joannes Flore sig-
nifer ducis Somerset, Henricus Tresham, Gualterus Courteney,
Robertus Acton capti Sf decollati.
Prior S. Joannis Londini captus Sf decollatus, cujus corpus Lon-
dinum ad suos delatum est.
Donati vita ab Eduardo rege.
Margareta regina.
Anna uxor Eduardi principis occisi.
Fosterus [Fortescue] ])'>'inius Justitiarius Anglian.
Doctor Makerel, Joannes Throghmerton, Baynton, Wrougton.
Hugo Courteney captus & postea decollatus.
*
Maner Places longging to the Abbate of Theokesbyri.
Stanwey was almost reedified and augmentid by Abbate Chel-
tenliam tempore Henrici 7.
Fordehampto7i a faire Place apon Severne in dextra ripa a Mile
beneth Theokesbyri and agayn the Parke of Theokesbyri standing
in laiva ripa.
The Maner Place in Theokesbyn Park with the Parke was lette
Leland ix Gloucestershire. i277
by Henry the 7. to thabbot of Theo&eabyri yn Fee Ferme with the
Holme wher the Castel was.
Tlieokesbyri.
It standith in Iceva ripa Avonce a good flite Shot above the
Confluence of Avon and Severne.
Ther is a greate Bridge of Stone at the Northe Ende of the
Towne, and ther a litle above the Bridge Avon brekith into 2.
Amies. Yet the Bridge is so larc;e that both cum under it. The
right Arme cummith into Severne with yn a flite Shot of the
Bridge, and at the Pointe of this Arme is the Towne Key for
Shippes caullid Picardes.
The other Arme cummith downe by the Side of the Towne
and the Abbay, leving it on the Este, and so passing harde ther
by Holme Castelle goith into Severne.
Ther is a litle Broke caullid Suliet dimming downe from
Clive, and enterith into Avon at Holme Castelle by the lifte Ripe
of it. This at sodayn Raynes is a very wyldc Brooke, and is fedde
with Water faulling from the Hilles therby.
Ther be 3. Streates yn the Towne meating at the Market
Crosse, wherof the chifiest is caullid the High Strete. Ther was
no other Paroche Chirch yn the Town but the Weste Ende of the
Abbay Chirche.
King John beyng Erie of Glocester by his Wife caussid the
Bridge of Twekesbyri to be made of Stone. He that was put in
truste to do it first made a Stone Bridge over the grete Poure of
booth the Amies by North and Weste : and after to spcde and
spare mony he made at the Northe Ende a Wodde Bridge of a
greate Lenght for sodeyne Lande Waters, putting the Residew of
the Mony to making of the Castel of Hanley on the Inheritaunce
of the Erledom of Glocester.
King John gave to the Mayntenaunce of this Bridge the hole
Tolle of the Wensday and Saturday Marketes in the Towne, the
which they yet possesse, turnyng it rather holely to their owne
Profite then Reparation of the Bridge.
Ther was at the South West Ende of the Abbay a Castel
caullid Holme. The tyme of the Building of it is oncerteyne. It
is certeyne that the Clares Erles of Glocester, and especially the
redde Erie, lay much at Holme.
The redde Erie much trobelid S. Thomas of Hereforde.
There hath beene yn tyme of mynd sum Partes of the Castel
278 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
standing. Now sum Ruines of the Botoms of "Waulles appere.
Now it is caullid Holme Hylle.
George Duke of Clarence Brother to King Edward had thought
to have brought Avon aboute the Toune and to have enlarged the
Town.
There was litle or no Habitation at Odo and Dodo gave to
Twekesbyri at such tyme as Odo and Theohesbyri Staneway cum
Docfo Dukes of M< erches and Brothers dyd membris, videlicet Tading-
erecte there a Priory of Blak Monkes ton, Prestecote et DidcoU.
Benedictines, a Celle or Filial to Crane- Thracy now dwellith at
burne in Dorsetshir. After in the later Staneway.
Reyne of the Danes and Edivarde the Confessor was jEilwerdus
Meaw Erie of Glocester, and he was countid as Founder of Crane-
burne.
Ailwerdus had a Sunne caullid Brictrice Erie of Gloceter
aboute the tyme of the Camming of Duke Wylliam of Normandie
ynto England. Matildis Wife to Wylliam Conqueror askid Bic-
trice yn Gifte of her Husband, and having hym put hym yn the
Castelle of Ilanley beside Saresbyri, and there he dyed. Sum say
that Matildis wold have had hym afore Duke William to her
Husband, but [he] refusing it had after hard Favor at her Handes.
Kins: William crave the Prseferrement of the Counte of Glocester
onto his Wif Matilde. After it cam to Robert Fitz Haymo of the
Blode of Duke Bollo Nephew onto King William Conqueror.
This Robert Fitz Haymo made the Priorie of Theohesbyri and
Abbay, making Cranburne but a Celle onto it, and translating the
chief Landes of Cranburne to his Monasterie.
Robert Fitz Haymo was buried at Tivekesbyri, firste in the
Chapitre House, after translatid into the North Syde of the Quier
yn a Chapelle.
Epit. in camera Sacelli.
Sybillay?7m comitis Arimtinse Hie jacet 'RohevtusJMns Haymonis
vallis, d- soror comitis Salapire hujus loci fundator.
uxor fuit Roberti filii Haimonis. This Robert newly made the
Hawisia uxor Roberti Cons. Buildinges in the Monasterie and
Chirch with the Towre.
Robertus Consul ejus gener asdijicavit pyramidem super turrim.
Eobertus Fitz Haymo left 3. Doughters, wherof the 2. elder
wher Nunnes, one at Sheaf tesbyri, the other at Wileton. King
Henry the firste kepte the 3. and she was after maried to Robertus
Consul, Bastarde onto Henry the firste, and was Erie Glocester.
Lelaxd in Gloucestershire. 279
He buildid the Castelle of Bristow or the most "parte of it. Every
Man sayith that he buildid the great square Stone Dungeon, and
that the Stones therof cam oute of Cane in JYormandie, and like
wise the Stones of the Toure of Theukesbyri Chirche.
Bobertus consul was buried at 8. James Priory in Brightstow,
Bobertus consul had a Sunne caullid Wylliam that was Erie
after hym.
Wylliam had 2. Snnnes, Roberte and Roger. Roberte dyed
young. Roger was a Preste and Bishop. Wylliam. caussid his
Sunne Roberte to be buried at Cainsham then a smaule Priory,
and after he newly repayred and endowed it, making it an Abbay
of Canons Regular.
Wylliam dyed yn Brightestow Castel, and wylled to be buried
by his Father at S. James : but he was prively conveyid by night
onto Cainsham, and had gyven the hole Lordeship of Marschefel
onto Cainsham,1 and impropriate the Benefice therof onto S. James
Priory, and the Benefice consequently cam to Theokesbyri.
Wylliam. had 3. Doughters, wherof one was made [maried] to
Almarike a Britaine, and he was the Erie of Glocester for a 6.
Yeres.
John Brother to Richard the fyrst maried a nother, and by her
he was Erie of Glocestre. King John had no Issue by her, and
kept her but a yere, and so repudiating her toke to Wife the Erie
of Herefordes Doughter, and reteynid yn his Handes the Toun
and the Castelle of Brightestow within the Hundrede of Berton
lying in Glocestershir hard by Brightstow as byttwixt the Forest
of Kingeswod and it : and so it hath syns stil remaynid yn the
Kinoes Handes.
King Johns Wife repudiated was after maried to the Erie of...
[to Geffry de Magnavilla Erie of Essex.]
Clare [Richard Clare] mailed a nother of the Doughters of
Wylliam. Erie of Glocester and was Erie of Glocestre.
Gilbertus I8. Sun to Richarde the first was Erie of Glocestre.
This Gdberte was buried in the Quier at Theokesbyri.
Gilbertus the firste had Richard the 2. Erie of Glocester, and
was buried in the Quier of Tewkesbyri, on the right Hond of his
Father, and there lay his Image yn Sylver.
Richard the 2. had Gilberte the secunde, communely caullyd
the redde Yerle by cause his Body was of a very ruddy and blody
Color. He delte hardely with the Monkes of Twekesbyri, and
1 There was, as it is sayde, a Nunnery at Marschefdde. Note by Leland.
280
Transactions foe the Year 1S89-90.
tooke away the giftes of Gilberte the firste his Grand-father. He
was buried on the lifte Hand of Gilbert the first his Grand-father.
Gilbert the 2. had Gilbert the 3. and he was Erie of Glocester,
and restorid to the Monasterie of Tioeukesbyri such Things as his
Father had taken away. He was slayne at the Batail of Strive-
line yn Scottelande, and was buried on the lifte Hand of his
Father.
Gilberte the 3. had John that died yn his Infancie, and was
buried in a Chapel of our Lady at Tewkesbyry.
This Gilberte the 3. dyed in the 23. Yeres of his Age muche
lamentid, by cause he was a good Man. He had 3. Sisters
Doughtters onto the Redde Erie.
Wherof Eleanore the eldeste was maried
onto Hugh Spencer the 2. Sun to Hugh
Spencer Erie of Winchester, and by her was
Erie of Glocester, and was beheddid and
quarterid at Hereford est and one of
the Quarters of hym was buried by the
lavatory of the High Altare in Twekes-
byry. A nother was maried to Da ley,
and by that Line in Processe one of the
Audeleys was Erie of Glocester.
After this the Landes beyng disperkelid Thomas of Wodestoke
the v. Sunne of Edwarde the 3. was made Duke of Glocester.
Then was after Humfrey Sunne to Henry the 4. Duke of
Glocester.
After this was Richard Brother to Edwarde the 4. Duke of
Glocester.
Edwarde Sun to Hugh
Spensar the 3. had Thomas,
and he was made Erie of
Glocester by Richarde the
2. wich Thorn is had to
WiieConstancetho Douirh-
ter of Edmunde Lavyeley
Duke of Yorke.
Okington Park longing onto Sr.
William Berkeley not far from
Over.
Loke wither Maurice wher not
first caullyd Barkeley and thenne
Graunte1 a loco tantum natalinm.
There is a Quarre of good Stone
at Beverstane, unde nomen ex con-
jectura.
John Lorcle Barkeley was
Batelle of Potters. After he
Losses of the French Men.
1 Leg. Qaunte. Hearn's note.
Over now longging to old Sr.
William Barke'ey was of the
oldeLandes of the Lorde Barkeley.
The Lordeship of Beverstane
was firste the Barkeleys.
Maurice de Gaunte was Lorde
of Beverstane Castelle by Tette-
byry. One of the Barke'cys
bought it.
wondid and taken, as sum say, at the
was redemed and wel recoverid his
LELAND IN GLonCESTKHSlIIRE. 281
One of the Barkeleys, that is to say the greate Graund-facler of
Syr William Berkeley, had yn Mariage the hole Lordship of Betis-
tre in Hampshir, mariyng the Doughter and Heir of Betistre.
MISCELLANEOUS NOTES.
Vol. iii. p. 116.
Thingges notid apon the Book of Bath.
JEhestun, alias Olvestoun, in Glocestreshire 16. Miles out of Bath
almost on Severn.
Cold jEschetnn 4. Miles out of Bath playne North.
(The rest of the extracts relate to Somerset).
Vol. vi. pp. 18. 20.
Palmer of Lemington in the very Egge of Glocetre a 3. Miles
from Rolleriche Stones cummith oute of the aforesaid House of
the Palmers of Warioikshire.
He began first with a very smaul Portion of Lande : and being
a Galant Felow, and elothid in migtie Colowrs, got a riche Widow
in Lemington Ton to Wife, a 80. yeres or more hens : and sins
there hath plantid themselves, and buildid a faire House, and
bought faire Landes to it. He that now hath it maried one of the
Gravilles Dowghters of Milcot.
There is a bigge Stone a 3. Miles West from Rolleriche Stones ;
and standith yn a Hethe, bering the Name of Barton, a Village
+1ierby longging to Mr. Palmer. This Stone is a very Marke or
Limes of Glocestre, Wicestre, Warwike and Ox/ordeshires.
And Palmer's Sun told me, that this Stone of certente is the
Marke, and not Rolleriche Stones.
->
Godrike of Pyrtoun in Glocestreshire within a Mile and a di. of
Gloces're Toune is of an auncient House, and hath at this tyme
a 100. Marke of Land by yere.
Wyse.
Wy dwellith at Lipiate beyond Cirercestre towarde Tetbyri.
Whiteney a Gentilman of a 300. Markes Landes by the yere
dwellith at Lecumbe in G locestreshir a litle from Stow yn the Wold.
There is in those Quarters a Village caullid Wynderusch : and
so is the Ryver of Whiteney cuminunely caullid.
Vol. vi. p. 35.
Sum say that there is a Manor Place in Glocestrcthire lately
282 Transactions for the Year ISS9-90.
caullid Tresham Haule, or a like Name, and that by likelyhod
that should be the auncientest House of the Treshams.
Vol. vi. pp. 53. 54. »
There remainith yet the Name of a Manor Place in Glocestershir
caullid Felton, and the Owner of it bare the same Name and was a
Noble Man of Warre, and one of the Band of Chaundoys. I
think that this is the Felton that the French Booke caullid Seal a
Chronicha spekith of whom a Lady Heyre to the Clares Erles of
Glocestre toke to her secunde Husband per amours.
The first Nobilitating of the Barkleis of Heron was about the
tyme of Henry the first or secunde. And then bare they not the
name of Barkeley, but Fitz Harding, wherof one namid Robert was
a Noble man. And in Processe the Fitzltardinyes maried_with the
Heyres Generales of Barkeley of Dourseley : and so the Name of
Barkeleys was taken of them and continuid.
The Name of Points, otherwise of sum written Pontz, is very
auncient, and supposid to be one of them that cam yn with
William Conqueror, or straite apon the Conqueste.
Pontz of Glocestre cam owte of a House of a Youngger Brother
of Sutton Pontz, and they had by Heire General of one Fitz Nicol
or Nicholas a yongger Sunne of one of the Barkeleys a goodly
Lordship caullid Hidle, and communely Hille, standing on the
hither Ripe of Sever ne. This Lordeship was gyven owte of the
Berkeleys Landes.
And they had after by Heyres Generales of Acton the Lorde-
ship of Acton.
Vol. viii. p. 49.
Ex annalibus, autore incerto.
Anno Dom. 1101. Wintonia conflagravit 16. Call. Jun.
Eodem anno 13. Call. Jun. Glocestria cum monasterio arsit.
Anno Dom. 1121. Glocestria? pars magna iterum cum monas-
terio arsit.
Anno Dom. 1151. fundata est abbat : de Morgan a Roberto
comite Glocestrise.
Anno Dom. 1158. Gul. comes Glocestria? captus est in castello
de Cairdif ab Wallis.
Anno Domini 1166. obiit J&obertus jilius Gul. comitis Glocestria?.
Anno Dom. 1216. Gilbertus de Clare suscepit 2s. comit: Glocester
<£• Herford: quorum heres fiiit.
Leland in Gloucestershire. 283
p. 57.
Palatia episcopi Herfonden.
Prestebijri 5. Miles from Glocester hard by CUfe. Ther is a Parke
hard by Prestebijri.
p. 60.
Ex vita Robertl de Betune episcopi Herefunden : auctore Gul.
Priore Lantonensi ad Reginaldum Weneloke.
Robertus ad se accersivit convention Canon: Lanhondensiura &
aliquanto tempore in suis cedibus aluit. Interim qucesivit [Inter
inquestivit] $ invenit eis locum habitationis apud Glocestriam sub
Milone Constabulario.
Expensas dedit ad cedificandum. Secundo anno transtulit illuc
conventum. Ad supplementum quoque subsidii dedit eis eccl. duas
Frome <& Brestebyri.
Vol. vi. p. 44 & seq.
Ex libro Donationeni Monaster, de Kingeswod.
Gul. de Barkeley dedit Abbatice de Tinterne Kinggeswood ad
fundandem ibi Abbatiam.
Illi de Kingeswood emerunt Haseldene a Dno de S. Joanne, cui
rex hanc terrain tempore [dederat] hustilitatis. nam erat Peginaldi
de S.Walerico.
Reginaldus de S. Walerico suis restitutio terris abegit monachos
de Haseldene. Postea autem recipit eos, & pars major conventus de
Kinffseswood translata est ad Haselden.
Postea propter aquce penuriam Reg. de S.Walerico transtulit eos
ah Haselden ad Tettebyri.
Rogerua Bai-keley filius Gul. Berkeley conabatur aut reducere
monachos de Tettebyri ad Kingeswood, aut Kingeswood eis auferre
tanquam suum fundum.
Bernardus de S. Walerico fuudator ecclesia de Tettebyri emit
Mireford prope Kingeswod a Rogcro Barkeley, Sf eo, quia Tettebyri
ligni copia carebat, monachos transtulit.
Reg. Barkeley dedit manerium suum de Acholte monaster. S.
Maria3 de Kingeswod.
Henricus Lovel testis.
Robertus de Berkeley Jilius Roberti cle Berkeley.
Philippus & Olivarius fratres Roberti junioris.
Testis Rogerus Comes Herford.
Hawisia uxor Dni de Veel.
Nicolaus Kingeston miles.
Charta Matildis de Veel uxoris Gaufridi de Veel.
284 Transactions for the Year 1SS9-90.
Robertus cle Veeljilius Gaufridi.
Gaufride de Wrokeshal miles.
Joannes Chansy miles.
Petrus de Veel miles.
•Joannes de Welington miles.
Thomas de Veel miles films Petri.
Gul. de Bradelega. [Hugo de Bradelega.]
Duddelegh pratum.
Manerium de Hakesbyri.
Manerium de Acholt, alios tvingeswood.
Thomas de S. Walerico Bernardi filins.
Robertus de la Mare.
Bitnes
Charta abbatis de Bethlesden de terra in villa Chirington.
Joannes de Warimunde.
Isabella de Longo-campo uxor Gaufredi de Longo-campo filia
Henrici de Mineriis.
Reginaldus de Breuse.
Gul. Butevilayne.
Humfredus de Bohun comes Herford ^ constabularius Angl.
Elizabeth de Gamages.
Walterus de Esselega.
Humfridus de Barre [le Barre.]
Humfredus Bohun comes Herford £ Essex.
Gul. de Breuse.
Gul. de Breuse junior.
Richardus de Br-euse^/iZms Gul.
Petrus de Bruse filius Gul.
Alduphus de Tettebyri
Rogerus Hereuard.
Henricus le Moyne.
Richai'dus Passelew.
Joannes de Breuse.
Thomas de Planca.
Petrus de Iwelege.
Rogerus filivs Philippi de Berkeley.
Robertus Jilius Nigelli.
Calicote villa.
Simon de Olpenne.
Henricus Berkeley Diis de Dursley.
Manasserus de Hastinges.
Delabere.
Robertus de Rochefrt.
The Liber Niger. 2S5
REMARKS ON THE LIBER NIGER, OR BLACK BOOK,
OF THE EXCHEQUER.
By SIR HENRY BARKLY, K.C.B., G.C.M.G.,
Certificates from the King's Gloucestershire Tenants in
capite, in 12th Henry II., as to the number of Knights' fees
holden of them, or held by them, in that county.
The Prelates, Earls, and Barons, throughout England, had
been enjoined by Royal Letters Patent to send in, on or before
the first Friday in Lent1 (17th March), 1166, Returns shewing
how many Knights they had of the old feoffment (i.e. of the time
of Hen. I.) ; how many of the new (i.e. made since that monarch's
death) ; and how many upon their Demesne.2
It has usually been taken for granted that this was done in
view of the levy of the Aid to which King Henry II. would
become entitled on the marriage of his eldest daughter. That
event, however, did not take place till nearly three years later • 3
and as the Aid then was not collected on the lines laid down in
the Proclamation above cited,4 it is fair to suppose there were
other reasons for the step, and that it was in fact the natural
sequel of fiscal changes which had been for some time in progress.
When it is considered indeed that well nigh a century had
elapsed since the lands of the kingdom had been redistributed
after the Conquest : that sweeping forfeitures among the Norman
grantees had followed the accessions both of Rufus and of his
1 We are indebted to the late Mr. Eyton for discovering this date.
2 No copy of the Writ is extant, but its language may be inferred from
that of some of the replies. (See Certificates of Robert de Brinton, referred
to by Dr. Stubbs.— Select Charters, p. 264.
3 Princess Maud was married on 13th October, 116S, being even then
only eleven years of age, while her bridegroom, Henry the Lion, Duke of
Saxony, was nearly fifty. (See Anderson's Genealogies).
4 It will be shown hereafter that in Gloucestershire the payments only
accorded precisely in three cases out of ten.
Vol/XlV. u
286 Transactions for the Year 1SS9-90.
brother : and that during the protracted civil war between Stephen
and the Empress further transfers and partitions of fiefs had
occurred ; it may readily be conceived that the old hidage valuations
recorded in Domesday had in many cases become inapplicable,
and that a fresh Register of Holdings was much needed, especially
when the levy of Danegheld was about to be discontinued,1 and a
new mode of assessment adopted. Without entering into the
vexed question of the exact date at which the Feudal System, in
its entirety, was introduced into England,2 it cannot be doubted
that the feoffments made on so large a scale under Henry I.
through which a great proportion of the Domesday sub-Tenants,
or their successors, had been confirmed in their holdings on
undertaking to perform definite amounts of military service;
coupled with the still more recent commutation of such service
into money payments, under the name of Scutage ; marked epochs
of considerable importance in the establishment of that system in
this country.
A great increase, moreover, in the number of such feoffments
had taken place during Stephen's reign, with the object mainly
of enhancing the fighting strength of rival Barons, and it must
have become all the more desirable for the Exchequer to acquire
reliable information on the present disposition of lands held of the
King, so that none might escape their share of feudal burdens.
This Avas all the more necessary because the first attempt at rating
Tenants in capite for Scutage on such portion of their fiefs as they
retained in hand, seems to have been opposed as an innovation,3
1 According to Dr. Stubbs, Danegheld was imposed for the last time in
1168. It is a curious fact that the tax is only twice alluded to in these
Returns of two years prior date.
2 It is impossible to draw a hard and fast line on the subject. In one of
these Returns (Liber Niger, Vol. I., p. 96) lands are said to have been given
in King William's time to a brother " that he might, if necessary, do the
service of one knight." Whilst as regards Scutayes, Madox, when quoting
Alexander de Swereford's assertion "that he had never heard nor seen an
account of anymore ancient than the reign of Henry II.," expresses his own
belief nevertheless that they were leviedj since remission therefrom is
granted in Deeds of the time of Henry I.
3 For example, Humphrey de Bohun ends his certificate by declaring
" for all his Demesne, and for these 9£ Knights because they are enfeoffed in
his Demesne, he owes the King no service except that of his body (nisi de
corpore suo). — Liber Niger, Vol. I., p. 3.
The Liber Nigek. 287
though they could not of course deny their liability to personal
service in respect thereof. I think that this is the only inference
that can be drawn from several of the certificates, as well as from
the accounts of the earlier scutage which have come down to us.
In the first of these on record (2nd Henry II.) tbe prelates alone
appear as contributing 20s. per fee, for the army of Wales : in the
second (5th Henry II.) for the same object at the rate of 2 marks
per fee, the sheriff renders account — not for the prelates only —
but for the knights of their counties : in the third, (7th Hen. II.)
levied at the same rate for the army of Toulouse, the Barons as
well as the prelates are entered as contributing, — but in respect
only of their knights, (I speak especially of Gloucestershire l) and
the same thing is seen in the fourth (8th Henry II.),- — it not
being until the next scutage, of 14th Hen. II. (levied on the basis
of these very Returns of the 12th) that the barons paid for all
fees whether in their own occupation or not.
The original Certificates of 1166 have (with two exceptions)2
long since disappeared, tTut transcripts made early in the 13th
century, were fortunately entered, along with copies of other
important documents, in registers known from the colour of their
respective bindings, as the Liber Rubeus and Liber Niger, or Red,
and Black, Books of the Exchequer, both of which still exist at
the Public Record Office. The transcript in the former, as we
learn from a memorandum therein, dated in 1230, owed its origin
to Alexander de Swereford, then a clerk in the department,3 who
having found, as he tells us, during his early period of service in
King John's reign, these important public instruments in disorder,
had arranged them according to counties, and " gathered them
together in one volume."4 This he subsequently had copied into
the Red Book, no doubt for facility of reference, since 250 parch-
1 Proofs will be adduced when I come to deal with the Certificates.
2 Consult " Notes on the MSS. exhibited at H.M. Public Record Office
at the Domesday Commemoration." I presume the Certificate of Hilary,
Bp. of Chicester, known to Dugdale, Madox and others, is one.
3 He became one of the Barons of the Exchequer in 1234, and so continued
till his death in 1245 (See Madox History of the Exchequer).
4 "in unum recollegi volumen."
U 2
•288 Transactions fok the Yeak 1889-90.
tnent certificates, with seals appendant, must have been bulky and
inconvenient for searchers.
The early history of the Black Book is not recorded, but I can
come to no other conclusion, after a careful comparison of the
Transcript of the Certificates of 1166 which it contains, than that
this was not copied from that in the Red Book, but in all pro-
bability from a common original, perhaps twenty or thirty years
previously, for the use of the King's Remembrancer, to whose'office
the Black Book always belonged. The counties follow in both in
the same order, and the arrangement of the Barons' " Cartse," from
first to last, is the same, whilst similar additions and interpolations
occur in each.1 In the Black Book, however, the latter are more
undisguised, and are not introduced under explanatory headings
as is usually the case with the Red.
Hearne, who early in the last century, published two editions
of the " Liber Niger2 — not from the original but from incorrect
MSS., declared it to be " worth its weight in gold," and to contain,
"with the exception of Domesday, the most ancient List of the
Noblemen and Gentlemen of England." This, so far, is undeniable,
but nevertheless that list is extremely imperfect, owing not merely
to the absence in many cases of Returns, and to the omission in some
of those sent in of the names of the sub-tenants, but still more to
the want of that systematic arrangement which distinguishes the
record of the Great Survey. Instead of the manors held by every
tenant in capite in each county being, as in that, grouped together
under one heading, his certificate embraces his entire holding
wherever situated, often with no indication as to counties, and
without the least information as to the manors comprised therein.
True these Certificates were afterwards roughly classified at the
Exchequer, according to the particular county in which the head
1 Not to multiply examples, Fiefs, are in three passages at least, expressly
stated to have been " of the gift of King Richard." Hearne was, of course,
aware of this, for he remarks in his Preface "Nee tanem asseveraverim
Librum integrum Mvi esse Henrici II. Paucula enim Bacardi I., Joannis
imo, et Henrici III. awum olent," but he did not take the trouble, in cases
where the anachronisms do not plainly show themselves in the text, to direct
attention to them by footnotes.
2 " Liber Niger Scaccarii parvus," to give its full title, as there were
others so called in the Exchequer Library.
The Liber Niger. 289
of the Barony was supposed to be, but sub-feoffees in Gloucester-
shire, for example, have to be sought under Middlesex or under
Derbyshire, as the case may be, and the result is a very consider-
able amount of doubt and confusion. The inconvenience with
respect to Gloucestershire may be judged by the fact, that whereas
Domesday specifies the holding of no less than 25 ecclesiastical
and 52 lay tenants in capite (excluding the King's thanes from
the latter) certificates from only 1 prelate, 1 earl, and 8 barons,
are given under the county in the Liber Niger, the others, if
they exist, being scattered about elsewhere.
My translation of these Certificates has been made from an
edition of Hearne's work printed in London in 1774, doubtful
readings having been collated with the original transcripts at the
Public Record Office.
The single Ecclesiastical Returns runs as follows :
(1) Certificate l of the Abbey of Winchcombf.
The church of Winchcombe has one fee of the old feoffment,
and all these hold that feoffment.'2
1 Roger de Dichesdon.3 7 Roger de Hela.
2 William de Beauchamp.4 8 William de Morin.
3 William de Scireburne. 9 Simon de Chulunces.
4 Jordan de Brochampton. 10 William de Dunetrope.5
5 Azo de Wenrich. 1 1 Gilbert de Froulinton.
6 Nicholas de Toning'. 12 Hugh de Redeford.
13 William de Chiveleia.
1 Carta, the word used throughout in the Latin, is rendered ' Cartel ' by
Dr, Stubbs ; and ' Charter ' in the Record Office Pamphlet, but in modern
acceptation neither seems applicable. I prefer ' Certificate ' as denoting
the real nature of the Returns, which are referred to in both the Red and
Black Books as " Certificationes factte per Prelatos et Barones."
2 This does not, I fancy, mean that they held in community, but merely
that they had to furnish the service of one knight between them or pay in
proportion to the extent of their holdings in the fee : a not uncommon
arrangement with ecclesiastical fiefs.
3 Probably Dixton, a parish in Monmouthshire.
4 Presumably the great Worcestershire Baron, who seems to have been
a sort of champion general of church lands, holding 1 fee of the Abbot of
Pershore of the church ; and half a fee at Evesham " at the cost of the
Abbot," besides 7 fees of the Abbot of Westminster in Worcestershire ;
and 15 fees of the Bishopric of Worcester.
5 A William Dunetrope appears as holding a knight's fee in Kent of
Walter Maminot (Vol. I., p. 58).
290 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
Of the new feoffment —
14 Humphrey de Scireburn holds one hide. And upon the
demesnes x 1 knight's fee.
Several of these sub-tenants took their names from manors
held by the abbey at Domesday, e.g. Sherborne, Windrush, and
Froulinton. The lands it then possessed extended in the aggregate
to 73 hides, but it is added that " in the time of Edward the Con-
fessor " the Church defended itself for 60 hides in the county."
It would appear to have still made good its claim to such exemp-
tion, for the two manors for which it paid scutage in after years
were, as we know,2 Cow Honiburn and Adelminton, set down in
the Survey as containing 13 hides. In all probability these con-
stituted the 2 fees plus 1 hide included in their Return.
It only remains to add that they paid 2 marks towards the
aid of 1168, or for precisely two hides, nothing being charged
for the fraction.
It is strange that there is no certificate for the Abbey of
Gloucester, but it was excused in 1168 for paying for 56 fees of
the old feoffment. Tewkesbury Abbey was no doubt answered
for by its patron, the Earl of Gloucester, whilst Cirencester held
by a fee-farm rent.
Immediately following the certificate of the Abbey of Winch-
combe, — without even a dividing line, or heading of any sort 3 —
comes, in Hearne's edition of the Liber Niger,
" William Marshal, Earl of Pembroke, owes 65£ knights of
the Honour of Striguil."
" The same owes 2 knights for Castle Goderich."
"The same owes for Pembroke."
As the first William Marshall was not created Earl of Pem-
broke until June, 1199, this notice must have been added after
that date in the Exchequer Registers as a memorandum that the
1 "Super dominia "— as enquired by the King's writ. I am not, how-
ever, quite sure of the force of "Super" in this connection. May it not
have meant " over and above " their demesne lands, which they held to be
exempt ?
2 See Trans. B. and G. Arch. Soc, Vol. XII., p 41 -Paper on Testa de
Nevill.
3 In the original Black Book, however, two lines on the ruled parchment
are left blank above this entry. In the Red Book it is introduced under the
descriptive title — " Novum appositum de honore de Striguil."
The Lieek Niger. 291
honours in question ought to be accounted for in Gloucestershire,1
although only three manors pertaining to them : Badgworth,
Stonehouse, and Daglingworth, were situated in that county.
The verbs being in the present tense, these interpolations cannot,
however, have been made later than 1231, when the second and
last William Marshal, Earl of Pembroke, died, consequently
within a very few years of the time when the certificates of 1166
were entered. 2
(2) The second Certificate is therefore properly that of William,
Earl of Gloucester, which begins —
" This is the Roll of the Knights of William Earl of Glou-
cester, without his knights of Kent : " 3
1. Jordanus Sorus owes for - - - 15 knights.
2. Robert de Mara - - - 10 knights.
3 Walter de Clavill - - - - 10 knights.
4 William, son of Robert, son of Roger - 10 knights.
1 In the returns for the Aid of 1233, the then Earl Marshal is rated at
65A fees of the Honours of Striguil and Castle Goderich.- Trans. B. and G.
Arch. Soc., Vol. XIII, p. 350, Testa de Nevill.
2 In the Red Book the handwriting of the entry seems identical with
that of the rest of the original Codex of 1230, and in the Black Book I can
detect little difference either in the handwriting or the ink, in this particular
case, although in most of the other interpolations there is evident dis-
crepancy.
3 It is not apparent why a separate return was made for Kent, where
the Earl (as shown at page 53 of this volume) had only 15 knights, holding
22f fees. In the West he held not alone in the county from which he took
his title, but in Herefordshire, Worcestershire, Somersetshire, Devonshire,
Dorsetshire, Wiltshire, Berkshire, and Oxfordshire, and probably in other
counties, his fees in all of which must be included under the heading of
"Gloucestershire," in this Roll. As regards those in Wales, two of his
knights (Nos. 39 and 40) are expressly stated to hold there, and I am not
sure that those said to hold a " Ounlion," 65, 66, 67, should not be in Caerleon,
but as pointed out by Air. G. T. Clarke (Arch. Journal, Vol. 34, p. 1), the
Honour of Glamorgan, inherited from Robert Fitz Hamon, his maternal
grandfather, and comprising about 40 fees is not included. The sum of
those under the old feoffment, which is left blank in the Roll, amounts to
256^, which with 13^ under the new, makes a total of 270. Of these I
doubt whether as many as a fourth were in the County of Gloucester, but
no sufficient data exist for arriving at a decision, the indications as to
localities, or names of the manors held, being few and far between.
In 1221 the then Earl of Gloucester, Gilbert de Clare, was assessed upon
332 carcuages in that county, which allowing 5 carcucates for a fee, would
represent 66 fees.
292
Transactions for the Year 1SS9-90.
5 Elias aureis testiculis - - - - 10 knights.
6 William, son of John - - - - 10 knights.
7 Richard de St. Quentin - - - 10 knights.
8 Gilbert de Umfraville ... 9 knights.
9 The fief which was Robert de Gornays -
10 The son of William, son of Baldwin -
1 1 Robert de Maisy ....
12 The fisf which was Richard de Grenvilles
13 Adam de Sumeri ....
14 The fee which was Helias de Dicton's
15 and Gregory has the 7th, as was adjudged before
Robert Earl of Gloucester.
16 Roger Witeng(ham 1) ...
17 Ponce, son of Simon
18 Robert de Reini ....
19 John Eskelin -
20 Roger Waspail -
21 The fief which was Geoffrey de Clinton's
22 Walter de Caisneio ....
23 Geoffrey de Traili ....
24 The son of Henry de Pomeroy
25 Richard de Guiz -----
26 William de London ....
27 William de Nerbert ....
28 Elias de Clifton ....
29 Roger de Jelesdona ....
30 Roger de Berkeley ....
31 Alexander de Montfort
32 The fief of Walter, son of Raamer
33 Robert Lagahit -----
34 The fief which was Geoffrey de Ragensfords ! 1 knight
35 The fief which was Walter de Fered2 -
36 William de Einsford - - - -
37 Roger de Winton ....
38 The son of Richard Walensis3
1 Stanawsford in Red Book. - Faringdon ?
8 WaloTi in Red Book. Valoniis?
9 knights.
9 knights.
9 knights.
9 knights.
7 knights.
6 knights.
7 knights.
8 knights.
5 knights.
4 knights.
5 knights.
5 knights.
5 knights.
4 knights.
1 knight.
5 knights.
4 knights.
4 knights.
3 knights.
3 knights.
2 knights.
2 knights.
2 knights,
-g knight.
1 knight.
1 knight.
1 knight.
1 knight.
The Liber Niger.
293
39 Roger, son of Herlowin
40 William de Cardiff
in Wales - l£ knights.
1 knight, and in Wales £ =
1J knights.
41 Roger de Rodolic ....
42 William, son of Odo the Goldsmith
43 Roger de Kimbis ....
44 Gilbert de Walberg ....
45 The fief of William de Hocton
46 Hugh Wake, of the land which Baldwin fitz Gilbert
1£ knights.
1 knight.
1 knight,
■g- knight.
1 knight.
held
47 William, son of Hervey
48 Elias de Torneberia 1 -
49 William Chamberlain of London -
50 Nicholas fitz Harding
51 William de Clivedon
52 Simon de Nuveton 2 ... -
53 The fief which was Ruald Croc's
54 Roger de Villiers ....
55 Robert de Bolevill ....
56 Gilbert de Grenemare -
57 Hugh de Hamtonford - - - -
58 Laudomar ------
59 Gilbert de Furnesham -
60 Roger de Berkerol
61 Wermond de Pormont -
62 Richard de Marci -
63 Ralph de Marci -
64 Maurice de Totenham -
65 William, son of Robert in Gunlion
66 Azo, brother of Leomer in the same
67 Roger, son of Malger in Gunlion
68 Herbert fitz Herbert, the Chamberlain
69 Roger de Bereguall -
70 Robert for the land which was William Torneants
1 knight
71 Luke, the King's butler
1 Thornbury ! - Newington.
1 knight.
1 knight.
1 knight.
1 knight.
1 knight.
1 knight,
li knight.
1 knight.
1 knight.
2 knights.
2 knights.
1 knight.
1 knight.
1 knight.
1 knight.
\ knight.
4 knights.
3 knights.
3 knights.
£ knight.
\ knight.
\ knight.
\ knight.
\ knight.
1 knight.
294 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
72 Milo de Cogan 2 knights.
73 Of the fief which was Robert Norensis 2 knights.
74 Osbert tie Pennard - ... 1 knight.
75 Robert de Constantini - - - 1 knight.
76 Of the fief which was Richard Foliots, which Robert,
son of Richard, holds 4 knights.
77 Osbert de Winchelsea - - - 1 knight.
78 Jordan de Capnun, of Umberley and Betinton 2 knights.
And his other knights are already written in this Roll.
The sum total of these knights - - - (blank).
These written below are of the New Feoffment of Demesne —
79 Hamo, son of Geoffrey, attorns himself for the Demesne.
80 Hugo de Gunnovill do. do.
81 William de Hastings do. do.
82 Robert de Grainvill of the Demesne
83 William de Bosco do.
84 Gregory de Turri do.
85 Roger de Mannavill do.
86 Fulk fitz Warine do.
87 Philip de Chahaines1 ....
88 Gerbodus2
89 Peter de Salso Marisco 3 - £ knight.
90 Richard de Chardi 4 .... a. knight.
91 Hamelin de Gunnoville 5 - 1 knight.
The sum total of those newly enfeoffed is 13^ knight.
As the only Feodary extant of the original Honour of Glou-
cester, prior to the incorporation therewith of the great heritage
of the de Clares, the foregoing List is of much interest, and I have
felt bound to insert it at full length. It throws less light than
could be desired on the early history of the county, the names of
the feoffees being arranged, without reference to locality, according
to the number of fees held. Representatives, however, of families
which long continued to be of distinction in Gloucestershire may
here and there be noted, as I proceed to point out.
1 Cahaignes ? 2 Gerboldus in Red Book. 3 Saltmarsh,
4 Chairdyl in Red Book. 5 Gundcville in Red Book.
for 3 knights.
1 knight.
^ knight.
£ knight.
| knight.
1 knight.
| knight.
^ knight.
Thk Liber Niger. 295
1 . Jordan Sorus, who heads the list with 1 5 fees, enough to
have constituted a fair sized barony, was presumably son of Odo
Soi*, who is mentioned as one of Fitz Ramon's companions in his
Welsh expedition. He, no doubt, derived his second appellation
from his complexion, since the word "sorus" meant " reddish."
It affords no clue to his ancestry, but his descendants, under the
surname of " Le Sor," long continued to reside in Gloucestershire.
In 3rd John (1201) John le Sor paid 36s. in that county in con-
nection with 14 fees which he held of the Honour of Gloucester,
then in possession of that King.2 At the time of Kirby's Quest
(1287) another John le Soer is recorded as holding a knight's fee
at Auricone 3 (Alvington 1) in the Manor of Fairford, from the
then Earl of Gloucester • whilst in 20th Edward III. (1356) the
heirs of a John le Ser are given as having a right to the same
manor ; another bearer of the name appearing as paying aid for
the fifth of a fee in Shenindon, Tewkesbury Hundred, " which
Symunda, daughter of John le Ser, had formerly held." 4
2 Robert de Mara, who is second on the list, with 10 knights'
fees, represented a yet more distinguished Gloucestershire House,
for he was grandson of William de Mara, whom Walter of
Gloucester, the Constable, styles "Nephew,"5 and to whom
large grants were made, both by him and by Robert, Earl of
Gloucester, the latter including 2\ fees in Rendcombe,6 where
the De la Mares, his posterity, long flourished.
7 Richard de St. Quentin, who also had 10 knights, held
chiefly in Wiltshire, but in all probability one of his fees was in
Gloucestershire, since his descendant, Herbert de St. Quentin, is
found at the date of Kirby's Quest holding one in East Leach of
the Honour of Gloucester.
1 From Italian "Sauro"; French "Satire," e.g. " Harengs Satires"—
"Red Herrings." In English commonly applied to a hawk with its first
year's plumage, i.e. a sore-falcon.
2 Rot. de oblatis et finibns in anno.
3 Trans. B & G. Arch. Soc, Vol. XI., pp. 2S4 and 201.
4 Trans. B. & G. Arch. Soc, Vol. X., p. 291
5 See Vol. X. of Pipe Roll Society, edited by Horace Round, Esq., No.
11, circa 1123.
6 See ditto, No. 43.
296 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
11 One at least of the 9 fees of Robert de Maisi, was like-
wise there, the Hampton-Meysey to which he gave his name.1
I doubt, however, whether the Robert de Gourney who precedes
him, and who is unnoticed in Dudgdale's Pedigree, had acquired
a footing in the county at so early a date.
17 Ponce, son of Simon, rests on sure ground as ancestor of
the Poyntz family, and we know that his 8 fees were in the
county of Gloucester, 1 at Tockington, and 7 at Hailes.2
Other equally well-known surnames may be cited, as
28 Elias de Clifton, one of whose three fees was the Glou-
cestershire manor from which he got his name, Roger de
Berkeley, whose two fees consisted of that portion of Dodington,
and other lands, which his grandfather held at Domesday of Bishop
Geoffrey of Coutances, whose possessions merged in the Honour
of Gloucester : (38) the son of Richard Walensis (Walsh) whose
fee was in Winterbourne : 3 (40) Walter of Cardiff, who held
the manor of Walton Cardiff, Gloucestershire, besides the half
fee in Wales whence his name was derived ; and (48) Elias of
Thornbury, whose surname indicates whereabouts he held — while
not to dwell on (50) Simon de Newington ; (54) Roger de Villiers ;
and others as to the situation of whose fees there is no certainty,
the list of knights of the old feoffment winds up with (78)
Jordan de Caprun (written Cap?^^t?^, I think by mistake), of whom
it is stated expressly that he held in Amberley 4 and in Botin-
tune, 5 where his posterity cannot long have remained, as both
were in other hands in the early part of Henry III.'s reign.
The knights of the new feoffment all held of the Demesne,
but whether Earl William or his father had enfeoffed them is not
stated. After the names of the first, and the second, in Hearne's
1 See Trans. B. and G. Arch. Society, Vol. XIV., p. 35.
2 See Sir John Maclean's " Memoir of the Family of Poyntz," pp. 6 and
28, and his account of Tockington. — Trans. B. and G. Arch. Soc, Vol. XL,
p. 24.
3 Testa de Nevill.— See Trans. B. and G. Arch. Soc, Vol. XII., p. 28.
4 A dependency of Minchinhampton, held by the Earl of Gloucester. —
Vide Atkyns.
5 Belonged to Te kesbury, but held of the Honour of Gloucester. —
Atkyns.
The Liber Niger. 297
work, se alto de dominio, is printed, which he, distrusting the
MSS. he had to use, suggested in foot notes should be taken to
mean "tenet iii m de Dominio," but I was very much surprised
to discover on reference to the original " Liber Niger," that the
version he followed was correct, and that it is confirmed too by
the text of the original Liber Rubeus. There can be no doubt
that the contraction " alto " in both should be, atto, i.e.
" a^ornavit," a common enough feudal term for "undertaking
to perform military service," but the strange thing is that the
scribes of the 13th century should have made such a slip of the
pen, especially as they had in a previous passage, in the certifi-
cate of the Earl of Arundel (p. 65), written the word at full
length.1 I can only suppose that this part of the roll of knights
of the Honour of Gloucester had become somewhat undecipher-
able, and I am confirmed in this idea by a further error which
occurs in the Red Book (though not in the Black), after the
name of the third knight, William de Hastings, where "se tercio
mil" follows, — " attornavit " being omitted, and the third part
of a fee assigned, instead of the three fees — as in the Black
Book— which he is known to have held. These fees were in
Southrop and Farmington, and not long afterwards were, with
two other fees, in Eaton, Berks, and Westwell, Oxon, formed into
the barony of Eaton Hastings, held direct from the Crown.2
79 Hamo, son of Geoffrey, and 80 — Hugh de Gundeville,
whose holdings are not stated in the Certificate, must, to make
up the 13| fees given as a total at the end, have had between them
4| fees. I know nothing of the former : but there was in the
service of the Bishop of Winchester about this time, a Hugh de
Gundeville, who became afterwards a man of some consequence,
being Sheriff of Hants in 22nd, and of Devon in 23rd, Henry II.
Others of the family 3 will be found holding lands of Gloucester-
shire lords in 1166, and it seems probable that both Hugh and
1 Et Rex Hemicus dedit de sue- dominio, quod Comes attornavit ad
servicium militarc, silicet, &c., &c. , &c.
- See Testa de Nevill.— Trans. B. & G. Arch. Soc, Vol. XII., p. 22.
3 A sister of Hugh de Gundeville's appears on the Gloucestershire Pipe
Roll at this date, as having an annual allowance of 15 shillings from Winter-
burn by the King's gift.
298 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
Hamelin de Gundeville (91), whose name closes the Roll, belonged
to the county.
In the reign of Henry III. another Hugh de Gundeville ap-
pears as a burgess of Campden, which is confirmatory. (William
de Bosco (83), Philip de Cahaignes (87), and Peter de Salt-
marsh (89), bear Gloucestershire names), though I cannot identify
them, but Fulk Fitz Warine (86) is a well-known personage,
though I am not sure what he held of the Honour of Gloucester.
His knights' fee in Alveston was always included on the Pipe
Roll of the county among " lands given," £10, at which it was
valued, being deducted from the ferm of the sheriff on that
account ; l but it is possible that at this period it may have been
reckoned on the Roll of the Earl, as Fulk made no return
of his own.
The sum of fees under the old feoffment is left blank, but it
will be found on adding up the holdings of the 78 knights, that
they amounted to 256 £, which, with the 13| held under the
new, by the 13 knights named, makes a total of 270. In the
account of the receipts for the aid of 14th Henry II., however,
the Earl of Gloucester is set down as paying for 26H only, no
reason being given for his being thus excused payment for 8| fees.
The Certificates of the Barons follow next, for though at
Domesday there were three Earls connected with the county,
their small holdings are not noticed. The Manor of Hampton
(Maisi), then held by Earl Roger (of Shrewsbury), had, in fact,
after the forfeiture of his son, Hugh de Montgomeri, under
Rufus, been included in the Honour of Gloucester : the two hides
in Longborough, then held by the Earl of Moretain, had in like
manner been confiscated on his son's rebellion by Henry I.,
whilst, although the Manors of Campden and of Bisley were still
in possession of another Earl Hugh (of Chester), (not, however,
through descent), no return was sent in for any of the fees of
his earldom in 1166.
Presumably the Baronial Returns stand in the order in which
the originals were arranged by Alexander de Swereford at the
commencement of the thirteenth century.
i The entry appears on the Pipe Roll for Gloucestershiie, however, in
this very year, but so likewise does the £14 to Walter de Ashley, whose fee,
nevertheless, is returned among Margaret de Bohun's knights.
The Liber Niger.
299
1
2
H
i
(3) Certificate op Roger de Berchley.
Let my Lord the King know, that I, Roger de Berchley,
have two knights and a half enfeoffed of the old feoffment,
whereof,
1 Michael holds
2 William, son of Baldwin
3 Helyas de Boivill - - - -
4 Hugh de Planta
and from these you have an entire knight.
For making up the half —
5 Ralph de Yweley
6 The wife of Ralph Cantilene
7 Roger de Albamara
8 Simon de Coveley
9 The Prior of Stanley
and here you have half a knight.
For making up another knight —
10 Walter de Holecumbe holds
11 Gerard -
12 Reginald de Albamara -
And so these three hold 10 hides, whereof they are unwilling to
do service to me except for 3 virgates, viz., each for 1 virgate,
and so1 you have two knights and a half enfeoffed.
No new one have I enfeoffed in my time.
If it be pleasing to your mind to hear about my demesne,2
In my Manor of Cobbei-ley I have two knights' fees.
At Stanley ? one knight's fee, with one hide at Codrington.4
In Niveton 5 I have one knight's fee.
1 The reasoning is unintelligible, 10 hides would have equalled 2 fees,
but 3 virgates were less than the sixth of 1 fee. I suppose some compromise
had been previously arranged, for Roger had paid for 2h fees in 7th Hen. II.
2 Roger de Berkeley apparently enters a sort of mild protest against the
enquiry as to his demesne lands.
3 Stanley St. Leonard's, where the second Roger had founded a priory.
4 Codrington, in the Manor of Wapley, which had been given to Malmes-
bury Abbey by the de Berkeleys, excepting this single hide.
5 Newington-Bagpath.
hide
hides
hides
hide
^ hide.
I hide.
1 virgate.
1 virgate.
1 virgate.
3^ hides.
3-J hides.
3 hides.
300 Transactions for the Year 1SS9-90.
In Dursele one hide.
In Osleworda 1 half a hide.
In Duddinton 2 three hides and a half.
In Slimbrigge 3 three hides, which I, with your assent, gave to
Maurice, son of Robert, whence I have no service.
Kingswood, the white monks,4 hold of the gift of William de
Berckley, for which I do you an entire knight's service, al-
though they wish to do none. Farewell. 5
Not a few of the barons address the King as their " dearest
Lord" or "most beloved Lord," but the foregoing somewhat
brusque epistle recalls, and confirms incidentally in several re-
spects, what is known from other sources of the history of the
writer, the third Roger de Berkeley, who, for alleged luke-
warmness on behalf of Henry when struggling for the throne, had
been deprived of the ferm of the Royal Manor of Berkeley, as
held by his father and grandfather, although allowed to retain
lands pertaining to it in demesne equivalent to about 3 knights'
fees, in addition to the 2^ wherein the second Roger had granted
the aforementioned feoffments; which 5 J fees, together with the
Manors of Coberley, Codrington, and Dodington, held in capite by
his Domesday predecessors, constituted the Barony of Dursley.1
His first complaint is, naturally enough, as to the refusal of
three of his old tenants— no doubt in consequence of the for-
feitures he had incurred — to do the full service they owed for
their lands. Such renunciations were common after the war, and
he seems to refer to a sort of compromise on his own part with
the Crown, as he only debits himself with 1 knight in respect of
the 10 hides in dispute, which ordinarily would represent 2 fees.
1 Oselworth.
2 Dodington, one of the Domesday manors of the first Roger.
3 Slimbridge, the marriage portion brought by Alice, Roger's daughter,
to her husband Maurice, Robert fitz Harding's eldest son.
4 Cistercians.
5 Hearne's MSS. is at fault here. There is no " Valete" either in the
Black or Red Book, the words being " nullum servitium facere volvnt."
6 See Smyth's "Lives of the Berkeleys," edited by Sir John Maclean;
also "The Earlier House of Berkeley. "—Trans. B. & G. Arch. Soc, Vol.
VIII., p. 193.
The Liber Niger. 301
His second allusion is to the 3 hides in Slimbridge given with the
King's assent (he might have written at his suggestion) to Maurice
son of Robert (Fitz Harding) who had married his daughter, from
which he had no service ; whilst his last grievance was the old
' story of the knight's fee in Kingswood given for the endowment
of the Cistercian Abbey thereon by his cousin William de Berkeley
without his concurrence, a gift which formed the subject of a long
controversy described in the Kingswood Register.1
Little need be said of Roger's feofees, whose holdings were
small, and none of whom belonged to families of consequence, save
perhaps (7 and 12) the Albemarles. (4) Hugh de Planca, and (5)
Ralph de Uley, had been among his sureties in the covenant with
Robert Fitz Harding in 1154, whilst (8) Simon de Cowley is said
to have been a relative of the latter. The fact of the Prior of
Stanley (9) holding under the old feoffment, proves the foundation
of that House during the reign of Henry I., whereas the gift to
Kingswood Abbey (which is known to have been founded in 1139)
is included at the end, among the new.
Besides the 1\ fees of the old feoffment, for which the assess-
ment of scutage seems, as I have remarked, to have been previously
adjusted, Roger de Berkeley admits in this Certificate holding 5
fees, plus 9 hides, or close on 2 fees more, in demesne, making a
total of 9^- fees. He appears to have been dealt with leniently
regarding the latter, as he had on the whole been in respect to the
former in 1161, for we find that he only had in 1168 to pay 100s.,
or 7 -J- marks, for the aid then levied at the rate of a mark per fee.
If we suppose that he was relieved of liability for the 3 hides in
Slimbridge, and for the knight's fee in Kingswood, which had
passed out of his hands, it would go far to account for the
reduction made. The Barony of Dursley continued to be rated at
7^ fees till the close of the century.
(4) Certificate of Margaret de Bohun.
These knights has Margaret de Bohun, who were enfeoffed in
the time of King Henry in the fief of Milo of Gloucester, her
father, which she holds in capite of the King.
1 Hugh parvus, owes . . 4 knights
2 Philip, son of Ernulf ... 2 knights
3 Otoer de Sunneworthe . . 2 knights
4 Almaric de Lokinton . . 1 knight
1 Monasticon, Vol. V., p. 424,
Vol. XIV. w
302 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
5 and 6 Ralph Chokerel and Elyas his brother 1 knight
7 William de Pinkeni ... 1 knight
8 and 9 Richard and Walter son of Robert 1 knight
10 Richard St. Quentin . . i knight
11 and 12 Richard Canute and Walter Moderli 1 knight
13 Walter de Esseleia ... 1 knight
14 William Picard ... 2 knights
15 & 16 Gilbert de Mineriis and Hugh de Cumdicot
§ knight
Of these, Isabel, wife of Henry of Hereford has 5 knights in
dower. These has she (Margaret) also infeft 1 in her demesnes,
whom her father and her brothers enfeoffed after the death of
King Henry.
17 William de Cernai . ^ knight
18 William Torel in Cernai
19 Helyas de Kokerel
20 Roger, son of Alan .
21 Richard Murdac
On the decease of Earl Milo's five sons without issue, Margaret,
as his eldest daughter, became heir to the family honours. She
had for many years been wife of the third Humphrey de Bohun,
whose own certificate for 40 knights' fees will be found under
Wiltshire (Vol. I., page 109). Berta, the second daughter, had
married Philip de Braose, but both she and her husband had long
been dead, leaving William their son and heir, who eventually
succeeded to the Honour of Brecknock, which Milo had got from
his father-in-law, Bernard de Newmarch. As yet, however,William
had to content himself with the Honour of Barnstaple, co. Devon
('Vol. I., p. 127), to which his paternal grandfather had acquired
a claim, and the only portion of Milo's inheritance which had come
to him through his father was 2 knights' fees which the earl had
held of the Bishop of Winchester ;— Humphrey de Bohun inherit-
ing another; (Vol. I., p. 69). Milo's third daughter, Lucy, was
wife to Herbert fitz Herbert, Chamberlain of Henry I., and there
is a tradition 1 that she brought him the Forest of Dean, which
1 i.e. " These are also enfeoffed in Margaret's demesnes," &c, &e.
i knight
1 knight
1* knights
1 knight
The Liber Nioer. 303
he forfeited later on, but there is no record in the Liber Niger of
his holding anything that had been his father-in-law's, except,
perhaps, two fees in Hants of the Bishop of Winchester (67.)
The Earldom of Hereford had been sequestrated by Henry II.
upon the death of Milo's eldest son, Earl Roger, in 1155, and as
neither Walter nor Henry, the brothers who succeeded, had held
it, Margaret de Bohun's claim was not of course admitted, but
her husband, and her son after him, both of whom she outlived,
were allowed to exercise the office of Constable of England, in
virtue of her tenure of the Manors of Haresfield and Newnham,
and her grandson, Henry de Bohun, was eventually recognised
as earl by King John, after he had executed a renunciation of
his own rights over certain ancient demesnes of the Crown,
which the Empress Maude, during her struggle for it, had im-
providently granted to his great grandfather.
Margeret de Bohun's share of her father's lands was, as set
forth in her Certificate, 17 fees of the old, and 3 J fees of the new
feoffment.
The Domesday possessions of Walter Fitz Roger, Milo's
father, in Gloucestershire, had only consisted of 22j hides, and
even with the 32 hides in the county held by his granduncle,
Durand the Sheriff, and a small subsequent concession of the
lands of Chetel, can hardly have equalled 10 fees.
It seems to follow, therefore, that at least half Margaret's
fees were outside the county, probably in Herefordshire, or in
Wales. In the latter, Milo's possessions had been much aug-
mented by the Honour of Abergavenny, which his father, Walter
the Constable, had acquired through marrying the daughter of
Hamelin de Baalun, and there can be little doubt that the 5 fees
stated to be held by Isabel, widow of Henry de Hereford, of her
sister-inJaw, formed part of that Honour, seeing that in the
Cartulary of Abergavenny Priory 2 the Castle of that place
1 See Paper by Mr. Crawley-Boevey, in the Trans. B. & G. Arch. Society,
Vol. XL, p. 206. This tradition is discredited by the fact that when King
John, not contented with his father's revocation of the gift of the Forest,
made by the Empress Maud to Earl Milo, obtained a renunciation from the
heir of the latter, it was from Henry de Bohun and not from Fitz Herbert
that he exacted it.
- Monasticon, Vol. IV., p. 613.
W 2
304 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
is said to have been settled on this Henry by his grand-
father nearly forty years before : a story, however, which we
are not bound to believe. That the whole Honour had not
passed on Henry's death, two or three years previously,1 to
his sisters, is clear, for it appears from the Certificate under
Herefordshire (Vol. I. p. 153), of " William, son of Reginald " (who
in the Red Book is styled " de Baalun "), that it was in the
King's hand, and was claimed by this William as heir to his
grandfather, Hamelin de Baalun, or, as he diplomatically puts it,
" he would owe the Service for it, if it should be his Lord the King's
pleasure."
Of Margaret de Bohun's knights of the old feoffment, but few
are recognisable as connected with Gloucestershire.
No. 1. Hugh parvus may be supposed to have been a son of that
Roger parvus who stands as third witness to Milo's second grant
to Lanthony Abbey in 1139, and who was, presumably, the
" Roger, son of Richard," who occupies the same position among
the witnesses to his first grant. This does not help us in deter-
mining who he was, or where the 4 fees he held were situated.
No family bearing the name of Le Petit, Little, or Small, was, so
far as I am aware, domiciled in the 12th century in Gloucester-
shire.
5 and 6 should probably be Cockerel, as Helyas Kokerel is
found holding ^ a fee under the new feoffment, and that family
was, ere this, established in the county.
8. Richard de Blechesdon bore likewise a well-known Glou-
cestershire name, and as the vill from which he derived it was
in Westbury Hundred, he most likely occupied the half hide which
Durand at Domesday held there.
10. The St. Quintins, as we have seen, held of the Honour
of Gloucester, and probably Richard's half fee adjoined his East-
leach Manor.
1 The name of Henry de Hereford occurs on the Gloucestershire Pipe
Rolls of 1162-3, but not later. Maihel de Hereford succeeded him, for he
confirmed Henry's donation to Brecknock Abbey, but he must have died
after very brief occupation. I find no evidence that William de Hereford,
the youngest and wickedest of the five brothers, lived to inherit.
The Liber Niger. 305
13. Walter de Ashley held the manor of that name in the
parish of Charlton Kings, Cheltenham, of the gift of Earl Milo.1
15. Gilbert de Miners appears on the Pipe Roll of 31st Henry I.
as accounting for the Pleas of Milo of Gloucester, in whose
service he must have been, and his name is found in 1166 not
only here, as holding under his daughter, but under the Bishop
of Worcester, and the Archbishop of York, both of whom, it
must be borne in mind, were large landowners in Gloucester-
shire. Hearne has a note suggesting that the name should be
written " Mineries " or " Mineris," but surely the spelling in
the text is sufficient to show that the family of Mynors, which
is only just extinct in the West of England, is meant. Gilbert's
partner in the half fee, (16) Hugh de Condicote, no doubt held
the hide in the vill thus designated, which belonged at Domesday
to Durand of Gloucester.
With regard to the tenants under the new feoffment, (17)
William de Cerney, and (18) William Torel2 in Cerney, must have
been recently enfeoffed in that portion of the Domesday estate of
Walter Fitz Roger in that manor, which had not been included
in the grant by Walter de Hereford to St. Peter's, Gloucester,
a grant confirmed by his brother Henry de Hereford. (19) Of
Elias Cokerel I have already spoken. 20. Roger, son of
Alan, has been identified as the ancestor of the family of le
Rus, or Pvous, who long held Harescombe of the Earls of
Hereford.3 It looks indeed, from his being rated at 1^ fees, as
if he held the entire 7 hides, of which Durand's principal Domes-
day Manor of Haresfield consisted, and so virtually performed
the subordinate duties of the High Constableship.
(21) As to Richard Murdac, who had likewise lately re-
ceived 1 knight's fee in the late Earl's demesne, I know not
where it was situated, or who he was. The name has a Celtic
sound, and was borne by sub-tenants in the north of England
1 See Testa de Xevill. — Notes in Trans, B. and G. Arch Society, Vol.
XII., p. 45.
2 See Willimus Torellus de Pencumbria, holding 2 fees of Robert
D'Ewias (Hereford, p. 159).
3 See Paper by the Rev. J. Melland Hall.— Trans. B. and G. Arch.
Society, Vol. X., p. 109,
306 Transactions foe the Year 1SS9-90.
before the Conquest, and in 1166,1 a century after it, a Robert
Murdac still held a similar position in Northumberland (p. 333).
There was, however, likewise a Murdac among the knights of the
Bishop of Chichester at Domesday, holding 3 hides, worth 30s.
per annum in Sussex, and as a Richard Murdac, probably his
descendant, appears in the Liber Niger (p. 63) as holding part
of a fee in the same bishopric, the chances are that this was
the man.2
It remains only to remark, that Margaret de Bohun is credited
on the Pipe Roll of 14th Henry II. (1168), with payment of 17
marks for the aid, whence it would seem that she paid for her
fees of the old feoffment alone, and was excused in respect to the
3| held under the new.
(5) Certificate of Ralph de Sudley.
It is to be known that Ralph de Sudley has enfeoffed in his
holding, which he holds in capite of the King, so many knights
of the old feoffment and of the new.
1 Richard de Cnictecote of the old feoffment 3 parts of 1 knight
2 Robert Russell a fifth of 1 knight
3 Agatha a fifth of 1 knight
"■a
This is the sum total of the old feoffment, the fee of 1 knight.
4 Also William de Tracy of the new feoffment of his demesne
the fee of 1 knight
5 Humphrey, son of William, of the new feoffment of his
demesne, and of the gift of Roger Parvus, the fee of
1 knight
In Domesday, Harold, son of Earl Ralph, held 10 hides in
Sudley, equivalent, according to the usual rating, to 2 knights'
fees, and 10 hides in Todington, equal to 2 knights more, but his
descendant here makes a return of 3 fees only. I do not know
whether (2) — who held a hide granted in the reign of Henry I.,
— was the Lord of Kingston-Russell, Dorsetshire, who, besides
holding a fee in that county of Alured de Lincoln, is accused of
unjustly detaining another from the Abbot of Cerne,3 (No. 4)
1 Vide List in Ellis's Introduction to Domesday.
'- On the Gloucestershire Pipe Roll of 13th Henry II., " Ric. Murdac owes
5 marks for the right of the land which he has not yet had."
s Lib. ISig. p. 77.
The Liber Niger. 307
was Ralph de Sudley's brother, who had assumed the name of
Tracy on marrying the heiress of William de Tracy, of Barn-
staple, co. Devon, and had probably been enfeoffed by his father in
Todington. He is generally believed to be identical with the
"William de Tracy, who, a few years later than the date of this
Return, was foremost in the murder of Thomas a Becket.
(No. 5) Humphrey is not, I take it, meant for a son of
William de Tracy but of some other William.
The donor of the fee may have been the Roger parvus alluded
to under the previous Return.
It is strange, in the face of this certificate, to find Ralph de
Sudley credited with payment of 15s. 4d. only towards the aid of
1168, or little over the scutage of 1 knight's fee. In 18th Hen. II.,
on the other hand, he paid 63s. that is to say, 3s. more than the
rate for 3 fees.
(6) Certificate op Robert de Scrupa.
It is to be known that I, Robert de Crupa, (sic) hold three
knights' fees from our Lord the King, and after the death of King
Henry I have enfeoffed no one.
The names of those knights are these —
1 Turstan le Despenser.
2 Geoffrey the Chamberlain of Glinton.
3 Simon de Ordingeton.
Farewell.
The discrepancy between the spelling of the name in the
certificate, and in the heading, is not due to any flaw in Hearne's
MSS., for it exists in the original Black Book, although not in the
Red, where de Scrupa is found in both cases.
The question of orthography is of some interest, as bearing on
the alleged descent of this Robert from " Scrob," a Norman
favorite of Edward the Confessor, as well as on the attempt made
in after times to identify the Gloucestershire House with the
Scropes of Bolton, which Hearne, in a footnote, assumes to be
incontrovertible. In a Paper, however, in Vol. XIIL, p. 351. of the
Transactions of this Society, I have shown that the pedigree put
forward by Sir Harris Nicholas with this view, is confuted by
308 Transactions TOR the Year 1S89-90.
the irrefragable evidence of " Inquisitiones post mortem," so far as
his last three or four generations are concerned. I was not aware
when I wrote, that a Robert Scrop occurs in the Black Book (p. 272)
as holding a knight's fee in Lincolnshire of Earl Simon (of North-
ampton), who, there can be no doubt, from Mr. Poulett Scrope's
researches, was the ancestor of the family of le Scrope of the north,
and a totally different person from Robert de Scrupa of the south,
whose name, notwithstanding this casual resemblance, is spelt
" de Escropes," on the Scutage Roll of 7 Hen. II., and d'Escrupes
in that of 14th, whilst in the 13th century the preliminary s is
always dropped, and it become " de Crupes " or Croupes.
It seems clear from the wording of the certificate that Robert
de Crupe had been in possession of these three fees pi-ior to the
death of Henry I., and was in all probability the individual to
whom that King had, on sub-dividing the escheated lands held by
William Leuric in Gloucestershire at the time of the Domesday
Survey, granted the Manor of Whittington in Bradley Hundred ;
Leckhampton being at the same time given to Thurstan the Dis-
penser, Hayles to Tancarville the Chamberlain, while other manors
of less importance fell to the Bassets.
The fact of Robert de Crupes thus appearing in company with
such great officers of state, certainly suggests the idea that he was
connected with the Royal Household, and this is strengthened by
the circumstance of Thurstan, and Geoffrey de Clinton the Cham-
berlain, being found here as his feoffees. The latter is now known
to have been son of another Geoffrey, who held the Manor of
Glinton or Clinton, in Northamptonshire, at Doniesday, of Geoffrey
Bishop of Coutances, and whose descendants in after days claimed
that he was a scion of the great House of Tancarville— hereditary
chamberlains of the Dukes of Normandy. This claim has gener-
ally been ignored by genealogists on the strength of an assertion
by Ordericus Vitalis, that the second Geoffrey de Clinton, though
made chamberlain by Henry I. , was a man of low birth ; but the
writer was liberal in such imputations on that King's favourites,
and it strikes me that Geoffrey's association here in the same
holding with the head of the Despensers, who unquestionably
were of Tancarville blood, tends to refute it in his case.
The Liber Niger. 309
Robert de Crupes says not a word in his certificate as to his
holding Whittington in demesne, which he and his posterity
certainly did. Perhaps he included it with the 3 fees he returned,
though his language scarcely warrants that supposition. As, how-
ever, we know for certain from Testa de Nevill that one of them,
Ordestan, in Berks, was held by a Simon, son of Hugh, presumably
the Simon de Ordingeton of the text, it would follow in this case
that his third fee, Baldington, Oxon, was divided between his two
other knights, Thurstan le Despenser and Geoffrey Clinton. Robert
de Crupes paid 3 marks in 1168 towards the aid, but in 18th
Henry II. he paid only for 2 fees, and his son in 6th Richard I.
for 2|. Subsequently 3 fees was the ordinary rating.
(7) Certificate of Henry de Newmarch.
These are the knights of Henry de Newmarch of the old
feoffment.
I Ernald de Baillioll, and 2 Humphrey de Pancevote hold 5
knights' fees.
3 Richard de Malemvilier
4 Geoffrey, son of Roger - - - - 1 knight
5 Henry Luvel holds 1 knight's fee, which he does not acknow-
ledge to hold of me, and I do the service.
6 Richard, son of Humphrey, -| a knight('s fee) which Jocelin de
Bailiol holds by the King's precept, nor have I any service
thence.
7 Geoffrey de Galehampton . the i part of a knight.
8 Geoffrey de Marisco . . the ^ part of a knight.
2 Walter del Cheisne, four parts of a knight, which Jocelin de
Bailiol holds by the King's precept, nor have I service thence.
10 William, son of Alured . . the ^ part of a knight
II Eustace Pancevot . . four parts of a knisdit
12 Hamelin de Baalun . . . .la, knight
13 William de Frohorne
14 William Mansel
15 Helyas Cokerel
16 Robert de Gundevill . . . four parts of a hide
1 It is clear, from the result of the calculation set out in the certificate of
Ralph de Suclley, that " four parts of a knight " stands for 4 hides, or f of
a fee.
'.-v
2 knights
2 parts1 of a knight
i a knight
310 Transactions for the Year 1889 -90.
17 Humphrey de Kenebelle ... 1 knight
18 Philip de Gundeville . the tenth part of a knight
19 William de Cadeberi . the tenth part of a knight
20 William de Derham . the fifth part of a knight
2 1 William, son of Reginald . . the fee of 1 knight
but I do not acknowledge that he ought to hold of me for what I
do Royal service.
Of the new feoffment —
22 Matthew de Baalim (holds) 1 knight of my demesne.
23 Humphrey Blund. the fifth part of a knight of my demesne.
Upon the demesne nothing.
Although his certificate is classed under Gloucestershire, the
chief seat of Henry de Newmarch's barony was at Cadbury, in
Somersetshire, in which county the great majority of the fees
therein referred to were situated.
The whole at Domesday belonged either to Turstin, son of
Rolf, or to Wido, son of William, but in what way they had
descended to Henry de Newmarch, has not been ascertained.
Neither is the christian name of his father known, nor the relation
in which he stood to Bernard de Newmarch the Conqueror of
Brecon. All that is clear is that Turstin's manors came to Henry
through his mother, daughter and heiress of Winebald de Baladon
or Baalim ; whether they had been acquired by the latter in
marriage, or, as seems more probable, after forfeiture,1 being
uncertain. Furthermore there is no evidence to show that Wido's
manors had descended in a similar mode, the donations made to
the Priory of Bermondsey and to the Abbey of St. Peter's, Glou-
cester, by Winebald, which Henry de Newmarch confirmed, not
having included any lands of Wido's. -
Henry's close connection with the de Baalun family is trace-
able in his certificate. The Hamelin de Baalun (14) returned as
holding half a knight's fee, cannot have been a descendant of
Hamelin, Lord of Abergavenny, Winebald's eldest brother, if
Dugdale be right in asserting that the former died childless.
1 Turstin's Domesday Manor of Stanton certainly fell to the Crown, and
became known as Stanley Regis.
2 See Dugdale's Monasticon.
The Libek Niger. 311
Doubt, however, is thrown on that assertion by another certificate
under Herefordshire (p. 153), in which William, son of Reginald,
styled in the Red Book (though not in the Black) "de Baalun,"
describes himself as holding a fee in which his grandfather,
Hamelin de Baalun, had been enfeoffed in the reign of Henry I.
and even prefers a claim to the Honour of Abergavenny, which
that Hamelin is stated to have bequeathed to Brian fitz Count,
his nephew, from whom it passed to Milo, afterwards Earl of Here-
ford. There can be little doubt that this "William, son of Reginald,
is identical with (21) the one whom Henry de Newmarch returns
as holding a knight's fee of him, but declines to acknowledge that
he is responsible for the service to the King.
We likewise find a Matthew de Baalun among the Newmarch
tenants. It would seem from the passage as to William, son of
Reginald, as well as from earlier ones in which Jocelin cle Bailiol
is said to hold parts of Newmarch fees, in two cases by the King's
precept, that there had been some dispute as to Henry's rights,
and this, perhaps, is corroborated by his declaration that Henry
Lovel refuses to recognise him as overlord in another fee, for
which he has to do the Royal service. As the latter's barony of
Castle Carey marched with Cadbury, this was probably an en-
croachment of Lovel's during the civil war, in which he had been
a very active partisan of King Stephen, but if so, it is strange that
he should have been allowed to retain it after the accession of
Henry II. (19) William of Cadbury had the tenth part of a fee
there, while (7) Galehampton, held by one Geoffrey, is in the same
locality.
Henry de Newmarch's fees in Gloucestershire are not dis-
tinguished from the rest, but they consisted, as we know, from
other sources * of Dyrham, the only manor in that county which
had been held by Wido, son of William ; and of Amney-Crucis,
Cotes (Cokerel), Hildesley, Tortworth, Frehorne, and Eastington,
all derived from Turstin fitz Rolf. In the first, a small feoffment
of one-fifth of a fee, seems to have been created in favour of a
William de Derham (-0), and it is not improbable that (21)
1 Testa de Nevill.— See Trans. B. & G. Arch. Soc., Vol. XIII. for fuller
details.
312 Transactions For the Year 18S9-90.
William fitz Reginald's fee was also there. Cotes (part of Achelai,
[or Oakley] in the Survey) was the holding of (15) Elias Cokerel as
half a fee ; (13) William de Frehorne held in the vill from which
he took his name ; (12) Hamelin de Baalun probably holding in
Eastington, while (14) William Mansel held in Tortworth.
(11) Eustace Pauncefote's fee was also most likely in Glouces-
tershire, though I am not quite sure where these 4 hides were.
(16) Eobert and (18) Philip de Gundeville did not, I think,
hold in that county, and (17) Humphrey de Kemble no doubt
held in the vill of that name in Wiltshire.
Of the two knights whom Henry de Newmarch had recently
enfeoffed in his demesne, Matthew de Baalun, already referred to,
was presumably his cousin, and a person of some consequence, if
he was the one of the name who held 10 fees in Sussex of the Earl
of Eu.1 Humphrey Blund, on the other hand, had only the fifth
part of a fee, or one hide.
I am by no means sure that I have correctly interpreted the
concluding sentence of the certificate, for the word "Super" has
many meanings ! I take it here to signify that Henry de Newmarch
did not consider himself liable to pay for his demesne except in so
far as he had made feoffments in it. It seems to me out of the
question to suppose that the 6 hides he had thus appropriated,
constituted the entire demesne of the barony. It is impossible,
however, to check this view by the amount of his contribution to
the aid in 1168, since in the first place there is a blank as to the
number of fees held by (3) Richard de Malemvilier, which prevents
our judging how many he ought to have paid for. Even setting
this aside, the calculation is complicated by the minute sub-
division in many cases of the fees, but 1 think it will be found
that he held 16 fees plus \\ hides of the old feoffment, and of the
new 1 fee plus 1 hide, altogether 17£ fees. For these we find him
credited on the Scutage Roll of 14th Henry II. with the payment
of £11 14s. 2d., equal to 17 marks and a sixth, or very nearly the
correct amount. For the scutage, however, of 18th Henry II., the
next levied, which was at the rate of £1 per fee, he paid £18
lis. 4d., that is to say for over 18* fees.
2 Hearne, Vol. I., p. 66.
The Liber NictEr. 313
Henry de Newmarch is returned by the Abbot of Westminster
(p. 51) as holding 2 fees of that church in Worcestershire and
Gloucestershire, 1 of these was no doubt Hasfield in the latter
county, a Domesday fee of Turstin fitz Rolf's, held for many years
by the Pauncefotes.1 He likewise appears as " Henry de (Novo)
Foro," in the Bishop of Worcester's certificate, as holding one fee
and denying another. These, no doubt, were Turstin's Manors of
Aust and Gotherington. in Gloucestershire, held at Domesday of
that See, and subsequently rated at half a fee each.2
(8) Certificate op Pagan de Mundublel.
These are Pagan de Mundublel 's knights of the old feoffment —
1 Humphrey de Bohun holds the fees of 2 knights
2 Simon de Chelefield ... 5 knights
3 Adam, son of Simon
1 knight
1 knight
1 knight
1 knight
1 knight
4 Hugh de Radeii 3
5 John de Baha
6 Simon de Hara
7 Ralph Murdac
but he does not recognise more than | a fee.
8 Geoffrey de Coldrinton . . ^ knight
The sum of these is 12| knights
Of the new feoffment, Pagan de Mundublel gave to Hugh de
Chaurcis, his brother, one manor for which he does no service.
And to Nicholas, son of Simon, his steward, a waste land near
Newbury for his services, by the service of the third part of 1
knight.
A division of the same holding.4
It is to be known that of the aforesaid holding Geoffrey de Vere
holds 7 knights' fees, which 5 Patrick de Chaurcis, grandfather of
Pagan de Mundublel, held on the clay on which King Henry was
alive and dead, to wit —
' See Testa de Nevill.— Trans. B. & G. Arch. Soc, Vol. XIII., p. 321.
2 Ibid. 3 Reading ?
4 In the Red Book there is neither separating line nor fresh heading, the
words running on — " Sciendum est," &c. , without interruption.
5 " de quorum," in Latin, which is nonsense — it should be " quce."
314 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
9 Matthew de Torminton x the fees of 5 knights
10 Humphrey Francbevalier the fee of . 1 knight
11 Henry Chevel2 . . . 1 knight
And beyond this, Alured de Lincoln holds 1 knight's fee which
Earl Patrick took during the war, and Earl Patrick holds besides,
of the aforesaid holding, 20 knights' fees through the marriage 3
(settlement) of his mother, and three manors of <£60.4
And Nigel de Albini one manor of £20, 4 similarly through the
marriage of his mother, — for which they have done no service.
Pagan of Montdoubleau, so styled from a castle in France,
was head of the family of Cadurcis, or Chaworth, which had
acquired a footing in England towards the close of the 11th
century through the marriage of Patrick de Cadurcis with one of
the daughters of Ernulph de Hesding, a great Domesday baron.
Another daughter was wife to Alan, son of Flaald, ancestor of the
Fitz Alans of Clune. After the decease of a second Patrick de
Cadurcis, late in the reign of Henry I., the bulk of Ernulph's
property passed to Earl Patrick, whose father, Walter of Salis-
bury, had married Sibilla, daur. of the first Patrick de Cadurcis,5
but upon the accession of Henry II. this Pagan de Montdoubleau
had obtained a charter granting to him all the lands in England
which his grandfather, Patrick de Cadurcis, had held.
In 1166, however, after a struggle of 12 years, he had only
succeeded in recovering the comparatively small number of fees
here returned in his name.
Of these, few could have been in Gloucestershire, although
from the Manor of Kempsford forming the head of his Barony, his
certificate was classed under that county. Ernulph de Hesding's
possessions there had, it is true, included besides, the Manors of
Hatherop, Amney, and Oldbury ; but these were retained, as we
know, by Earl Patrick ; whilst the Manors of Badminton and
2 Tormarton, Gloucestershire.
1 Cheverel ? Among the tenants of Earl Patrick.
3 " tie Matrimonio Matris suse."
4 In the Black Book the abbreviation " Libr " follows the Roman numer-
als lx and xx, but is omitted in Hearne.
5 See Trans. B. & G. Arch. Society, Vol. XII., p. 14.— Paper on Testa de
Nevill.
The Libek Nigek. 315
Acton, likewise part of Ernulph's Domesday holding, as well as the
Manor of Torinarton, which he had subsequently acquired from
Richard the legate, were now in the hands of William fitz Alan's
heirs.
The 20 hides at which Kempsford was rated in the Great
Survey, would not have been more than equivalent to 4 knights'
fees, but possibly some subsequent increment may have brought it
up to 5, which, presumably, were those held of Pagan by Simon
de Chelefield, his only large tenant. If this were not the case, one
would almost be driven to suppose that Kempsford was purposely
left out as being held in demesne, a view which is so far supported
by the fact that at the time of Kirby's Quest (1287) the then
Patrick de Gadurcis held it by barony, no sub-feoffee being
mentioned, while in 1346 Henry of Lancaster, who had married
the Chaworth heiress, likewise retained the manor in his own
hands.
Of Pagan's other knights little need be said.
Humphrey de Bohun's fees were doubtless part of the marriage
portion his father had received in Wiltshire with the daughter of
Walter de Salisbury, but how these two had been separated from
the rest, to be held of Pagan de Montdoubleau instead of Earl
Patrick, is nowhere explained. Perhaps as Humphrey was Pagan's
cousin he may have concurred in the arrangement.
There are indications in respect to Pagan's other fees, that
they were in Berkshire, where he had got back some of his grand-
father's manors, as shown by the new feoffment he had created
near Newbury in favour of his steward, Nicolas fitz Simon.
With regard to the other division of the holding of the first
Patrick de Cadurcis, Geoffrey de Vere therein spoken of, had
married the widow of William fitz Alan, who had the 7 fees in
question in dower. He was a younger brother of the first Earl
of Oxford, and a man of considerable influence. It is clear,
from the name of his principal sub-tenant, Matthew de Tor-
marton who held 5 out of the 7, that he was a Gloucestershire
man, but I am not so sure as to Humphrey Franchevalier, or
Henry Cheverel, who each held one of the other fees. Alured of
Lincoln's, Earl Patrick's, and Nigel de Albini's, shares of the same
316 Transactions for the Year 1SS9-90.
holding were in Wiltshire. Who the last named was has not been
ascertained.1
It is not very easy to understand from whom this second
certificate emanated, but it served as a sort of protest on behalf
of Pagan de Montdoubleau against the forcible detention of his
grandfather's lands, and it may have been designed by him also as
a reason why he should not be rated for the whole fief. That this
was in contemplation is clear from an entry which appears on the
Berkshire Pipe Roll of the succeeding year,2 which runs : " Pagan
de Mundublel renders account of £18 13s. 4d. for knights, but it
ought to be required from Earl Patrick and Geoffrey de Vere, who
have these knights " — "by writ of the Earl of Leicester, by writ
of the King beyond the sea."
There is not sufficient evidence 3 to shew whether this order
was complied with by the powerful nobles 4 to whom it was
addressed, but it sufficed at any rate to exonerate Pagan from the
attempted surcharge, since, to the aid for marrying the King's
daughter, he contributed but 12| marks for as many fees. Those
of the new feoffment were apparently exempted, as in the case of
Margaret de Bohun and others.
It is noticeable, however, that four years later (18th Hen. II.),
Patrick de Cadurcis, presumably Pagan's son, paid £19 scutage
for as many fees, that is to say for 6| more than his father had
done. Possibly he had recovered that number in the interim,
especially as Earl Patrick had been assassinated in France in
1168. On the other hand in the collection of the aid of 1235,
Paean de Cadurcis figures for " 12| fees of Pagan de Mundubbel's.5
1 Probably of Cainho, Bedfordshire. A charter of Robert de Albini to
the Abbey of Beaulieu, in that county, is witnessed by Nigel de Albini, his
brother, and Patrick de Cadurcis. — Yeatman's House of Arundel, p. 151.
2 Publications of the Pipe Roll Society, Vol. XI., p. 6.— Great Boll of the
Pipe for 13th Henry II., 1166-1167.
3 There is no Returns of the Collection for the Aid in the Shropshire
Pipe Roll of 14th Henry II.
* Geoffrey de Vere accounts on this very Pipe Roll as Sheriff of Shrop-
shire, Holder of the Honour of the Constable, and Receiver of the Bishopric
of Hereford.
5 Trans. B. & G. Arch. Soc.Vol. XIII., p. 351— Paper on Testa de Nevill.
The Liber Niger. 317
(9) Certificate of Robert Son of Harding.
To Henry, by the Grace of God, King of England, Duke of
Normandy, and of Acquitaine, Earl of Anjou, Robert son of
Harding, greeting. Know ye, that I owe you the service of 5
knights from Berkelai, but Roger de Berkeley holds land of the
Honour of Berkelai, for which he does me ] no service, to wit,
Osemorde,2 and half Neweton,3 and all the fee of Bernard the
Chaplain.
As the confirmation by Henry II., shortly after his accession,
of the Honour of Berkeley to Robert fitz Harding, to be held
by the service of 5 knights, could in no way have invalidated
the compromise previously effected, by virtue of which Roger de
Berkeley (m) was to retain all lands held by military service,
outside the former fee farm manor, — the allegation that the latter
did no service for these to his successor, can only be attributed
to pique. As regards the whole of Newington, as well as the land
of Bernard the Priest, it is clear from Domesday {hat they were
granted by William the Conqueror to the first Roger de Berkeley,
though the half hide in Oselworth was, it must be admitted, then
included in the fee farm manor. Bernard's lands had been given
by the second Roger to the Priory of Stanley St. Leonard's, which
he bad founded, but his son apparently continued to perform the
Royal service.
Robert fitz Harding appears on the Roll of 14th Henry II. as
paying 5 marks towards the aid, for his 5 fees. On the Great Roll
of the Pipe for the previous year he had been excused a far larger
sum in respect to his lands in Gloucestershire, but, probably, this
was rather a credit on account than a gift, for he seems still to
have continued to act as the Royal banker, the cost of conveying
from Cricklade to London the money which he lent to the King
being charged by the Sheriff of Berks.
This concludes the Certificates under Gloucestershire, but
there are, as previously remarked, many Gloucestershire fees in
those classed under other counties. Generally there is no allusion
1 Contracted in the text to m, which Hearne in a note reads modo, but
this is opposed to the sense.
2 Oselworth. 3 Newington-(Bagpath).
Vol. XIV. x
318 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
to the fact, though, in some cases, the names of persons or of
places introduced leave little room for doubt. Thus, in the county
of Salop (p. 145) the guardians of William fitz Alan (n) append a
list of knights holding 8^ fees of the Wiltshire fief, which the
minors had inherited from Ernulph de Hesdings, the first name
being that of Robert de Turvill, who is known from other sources to
have held the M anor of Acton-Turvill, in Gloucestershire, of him as
1 fee ; the third, being Robert's near neighbour, Matthew de Tor-
marton, holding 2 fees ; and the fifth, Humphrey Franchevalier
with 1 fee ; both of the latter having, as we have seen, been
returned among the feoffees of fitz Alan's stepfather, Geoffrey de
Vere, in that county. William fitz Alan's remaining 4£ fees were
most likely in Wilts, Peter de Lavington, who held 1 of them, no
doubt taking his name from the vill so called.
In other Certificates there are no such indications, though it
may be placed beyond doubt by later Returns that the descen-
dants of Gloucestershire Domesday Tenants-in-Capite continued
to possess the manors derived from them, notwithstanding their
Returns were made elsewhere. Thus Elias Giffard must have
included among the 9 fees he certified for in Wiltshire, Rock-
hampton, Stoke (Giffard) and Brimpsfield, in Gloucestershire,
which his ancestor, Osbern, had held at the time of the Survey.
Hascoit Musard must no doubt have returned, under Notting-
ham, the four manors which his ancestor of the same name had
in Gloucestershire at Domesday, although in the case of one only,
"Eston," held by a Walter de Eston in 1166, is this discoverable;
whilst under Herefordshire, though we know that Baderon de
Monmouth, Hugh de Lacy, Richard de Cormeilles, and Richard
de Chandos — the last, successor to Hugh 1'Asne's barony, — all still
held the manors which their ancestors had held in the adjacent
county at Domesday, there is little to guide one as to the fees in
which they were comprised a century later.
The Certificates of the Prelates connected with Gloucestershire,
scarcely supply more definite information as to the holdings of
their tenants in that county. That of the Bishop of Hereford
alludes to two fees held by Hugh de Lacy "of his demesne,"
The Lir.ER Niger. 319
(though he now denies the service of one) ; and two and a half,
which Margaret de Bohun holds (but denies the service of the
half), the whole four and a half being referred to as if there had
been some connection between them. Margaret's, there can be
little doubt, was in Sevenhampton, Gloucestershire, a part of which
Durand the Sheriff had held of the Church of Hereford at the
time of the Survey.1
The See of Worcester had held since before the Conquest the
Hundreds of Henbury and Cleeve, besides manors in other Glou-
cestershire Hundreds, and so late as the 13th century paid scutage
to the King for nearly 14 fees, so that it is not surprising to find
many knights of that county in the Certificate sent in by the
Bishop in 1166. Both the Earl of Gloucester and Humphrey de
Bohun are set clown for 7| fees, but the former only recognised
the service of 1 ; the latter of 4. Besides these, Elias Giffard
holds 1 ; Henry de Foro (i.e. Novo Foro, a synonym for New-
march) 1, and denies another; Gilbert de Mineriis 1- Walter
de Clifford 1 ; Hugh Puber 2^ ; with several others who were
presumptively enfeoffed in Gloucestershire.
Lastly, the Abbot of Westminster, who held the Hundred of
Deerhurst of the gift of Edward the Confessor, sends in a Certifi-
cate, under Middlesex (p. 51) in which, unfortunately, his fees in
Gloucestershire, except in the single case of two held by the Earl
of Gloucester, are bracketed with those held of the abbot by the
same feoffees in the adjoining county of Worcester. Thus Hugh
Puber is returned as holding 3 knights in the two counties ;
Reginald de Stainlinge 2 ; Henry de Xewmarch 2 ; William
Folet 1 ; and Ralph de Monmouth 1, though he refused to do the
service, — following in this the example of the Earl of Gloucester,
— who since the second scutage for Wales in 5th Hen. II., had,
it is mentioned, repudiated the obligation.
It is impossible in most cases to identify the manors held, but
de Newmarch no doubt possessed Hasfiekl which Turstin fitz Rolf
had held of the Abbey at Domesday ; and Ralph de Monmouth,
Trinlie or Tirley, which William fitz Baderon had similarly held.
What relation the latter was to Baderon de Monmouth, the head
' See post p. 329.
x 2
320 Transactions for the Year 1SS9-90.
of the family, does not appear, but he may have been the ancestor
of the Roger de Monmouth who held by serjeanty in King's
Weston and in Leckhampton early in the next century.
Doubtless other Certificates may include Gloucestershire fees,
but I have not been able to trace them.
I will only, in conclusion, add, that I was surprised on looking
at the original Black and Red Books of the Exchequer to find
that the name of Robert de Amenevill, which appears at the end
of Herefordshire in both, is an obvious interpolation, made at a
period subsequent to 1166.
On Old Tools and Implements 321
ON OLD TOOLS AND IMPLEMENTS.
By ROBERT TAYLOR, M.A.
Read at Cheltenham, 16th July, 1S89.
[This Paper was intended to fill an interval which I expected to
occur between two papers at a Spring Meeting at Stroud, an
informal gathering of which the papers were not for publication.
It was not wanted at Stroud, and with reluctance I read it at the
Summer Meeting at Cheltenham ; with more reluctance I consent
to its publication now, not because I consider the subject unsuited
to our discussion and our Proceedings, but because it is dealt with
so lightly, and so imperfectly.]
I want to claim your attention for a few minutes to what I call
my Plea for Old Tools ; and I have been the more anxious for
this opportunity because the appeal can properly be addresed only
to such an audience as this. In the great workshops of Birming-
ham tools must disappear as soon as they are superseded ; there
is no time to waste over, or space to store, any on which an
improvement has been effected ; in like manner the trim-pared
villas of Bournemouth have no lumber-room in which old-fashioned
things may linger. So it is in a country town, in a manufacturing
district like this, that I should most hopefully begin a search for
survivals.
How many relics can we find, I don't say centuries old like
Mr. Hyett's astrolabe, but of our own or our fathers' time 1 Nay,
how many can I recall which were familiar enough on the edge of
my memory, not yet of 50 years' reach, yet are now treasures for
a museum 1 I can remember the cook's tinder box, with its flint
and steel, and store of tinder and long matches tipped with yellow
brimstone, though I never saw her use it : then there was another
implement meant to do the work better, like a big tin pistol, in
the butt of which you turned a wheel hoping to let successful
322 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
sparks fly. Where are these tinder boxes now 1 I am told that
a neighbour treasures a part of his old box, and have a friend, a
grave Professor at Cambridge, who proudly shows one he picked up
in Leicestershire, and boasts very much that he has brought fire
out of it ! The operation would surprise us as much as it would the
Andaman Islanders, who have never learnt to make fire, though
it is no wonder in the Roman Church, for that the Paschal taper
requires to be lighted from fresh fire year by year; two years ago,
during the Easter Eve ceremonies in the chief church in Havre,
I saw the beadle hard at work with his flint and steel, and his
unsuccessful clicking made me think tenderly of poor women busy
over damp tinder in the past. And when she had her light —
think of the candle she had to use ! Is there any place in Stroud
which could supply a real rushlight 1 or a rushlight stand 1 that
big cylinder full of holes to frighten timid children 1 And how
many pairs of snuffers can we raise 1 These implements, I fancy,
had but a short reign, and just as they had received their last
improvements, the unlucky discovery of the virtues of bismuth
wire and plaited wicks uperseded their pride. I remember my
mother's last pair, the creaking and screaming as it opened its
fateful jaws, and the crack and snap as the inner door shut down,
too often with the light inside as well as the soot. Those candles
which required snuffing are lost, and all others seem inclined to
follow, under pressure of competition from oil lamps of all shapes
and sizes. Perhaps systems of lighting have changed more than
aught else within memory ; we are becoming impatient even of
gas, clamouring for the dainty electric light even in our bedrooms;
yet look at this ! thirty years ago not a cottage in North Scotland
had more light in evening than was given by a rush wick floating
in coarse fish oil, giving a lurid flame and an excessive abundance
of greasy fetid smoke ; thirty years ago and you might have
bought them by the dozen in any village there ; now the com-
petition of cheap mineral oil has almost destroyed the memory of
them ! Six years back, my attention was drawn to some in the
Antiquarian Museum in Edinburgh, and the one I have shewn
you was obtained by a friend from a crofter in Caithness, and is
On Old Tools and Implements. 323
worth half-a-guinea in any curio shop in Edinburgh.1 This is an
older relic which was treasured by my grandmother, though I
believe she did not know its use; as you see it is a holder for a
coil of wax taper ; when I was a boy an old clergyman, of whom
I was very fond, used one habitually.
Again, where the milder manners of the present time threaten
only " the utmost rigour of the law," which Mr. Justice Mathew
considers a fair invitation to trespass, in my time all the notice
boards warned of " mantraps and spring-guns ;" how many of
either have you seen 1 Jeffreys, in his Gamekeeper in a Southern
County, gives an elaborate description of a man-trap ; in our last
spring excursion someone saw a broken one at Old Sodbury
Manor House,2 and I am indebted to the kindness of Mr. Wathen
1 The lamp is called a goose-nib, and evidently derives its name from its
shape, being like the skull and upper bill of a goose, wrought in iron ; each
lamp has two of these, the lower one rivetted to the bar by which the lamp
is hung up, the other to a rod which hangs on a tooth projecting from this
bar ; the oil and wick are put in the upper one, the lower seems intended to
catch the overflow : besides these, a hook and spike are provided for trim-
ming. The wicks are called naib, or rushes; in fact they are rushes, and
authorities are careful to warn you that they must be pulled at full moon. The
oil was made from the dog-fish, and the day when the fish were boiled down
was anything but a gaudy-day. The friend to whom I am indebted for my
goose-nib shewed me a yet more curious, and much rarer, tool, a sort of
rough spring pincers fastened to an upright to hold the splinter of bogwood
which serves as candle in inland places ; it was called puir-man, because it
took the place of the poor wayfarer who might earn his night's shelter by
holding the light.
2 Mr. Wathen's Mantrap was a more frightful object than I had expected,
and I begged permission to keep it for some weeks for the edification of
holiday visitors. The trap proper consisted of two square-cornered jaws,
not only serrated but armed with sharp spikes some two inches long ; they
were kept open by a pin from one side which caught under a projection from
a plate in the middle, which plate would turn aside, and free the pin, under
the pressure of any stray foot ; this, of course, answered to the plate on
which in a rat-trap the bait would be fixed ; the jaws being thus freed,
two strong springs came into play, which were rivetted to the two ends
of the flat liar, which made the base of the whole. The whole weighed 54
pounds ; the bar was 6 feet long, and had a hole at each end for a pin to
fasten it down ; a victim would be held by the jaws, and their spikes, just
below the knee, and could certainly not reach both springs at once, so that
he must wait for help to get free ; Jeffries says that he knew a man who had
managed to get home with one at his heels, but I am sure Goliath of f4ath
could not so have dragged this one. I have curious evidence of the length of
time such things must have been out of use, in that two of my neighbours,
324 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
for permission to show this magnificent specimen. Spring guns
I have only seen in the Museum at Reading, and cannot make
out what harm they could do beyond giving an alarm ; yet I
remember to have heard that the use of them was given up in
consequence of an obiter dictum of a judge at Norwich assizes
about 1847; he spoke somewhat as follows: "Your private
legislation would make trespass, which at worst is only a misde-
meanour, a capital crime ; if a case comes before me, I shall know
what to call it."
From tortures pass to punishments : how many stocks can you
find in the county 1 When I was a boy every village had its pair,
fixed generally between a duck-pond and a nettle-bed, and I
believe I remember seeing a pair occupied in the market place at
Shrewsbury. Now the only one I know is that handsome wrought-
iron one at Painswick, with a rail and the churchyard wall to rest
against, and a gas-lamp instead of a whipping-post, any man might
be proud to be enthroned there, yet I have been told that the
police officer at Painswick held for a long time a warrant of about
1860 directing him to seat there for two hours a man who had the
bad taste to run away ! At Huntley there is a wooden pair ; it was
described to me as complete, but on cross-examination I could
not be sure that it had a whipping-post ; that fell out of use
sooner, and though we might manage to put a patient safely away
away in the stocks, I fear a sturdy rogue might hunt the county
over without finding a constable capable of tying him up in
proper form, and beating him " till his back was bloody." The
form of the companion pillory is known to us all from pictures,
but a London acquaintance, who had been out with the Archaeo-
logical Association every year of its existence, and with the
parent society several years before,1 had never seen an original
pillory till we visited Marlborough from Devizes in 1880. Of the
gallows I don't suppose we have any local relics, even though Sir
now about 65, natives of different parts of the country, remember to have
seen such traps hung up in apple trees in their youth, but had never
actually beheld one set.
1 I think I have seen lately, in the Illustrated London News, some
sketches from Waltham Holy Cross, in which the pillory figures as still
existing.
On Oli> Tools and Implements. 325
Anthony Kingston, who no doubt had been put to inconvenience
by hurried makeshifts in the course of his campaign in the west,
left lands to endow one in Sheepscombe, and another in Pains-
wick.
From outdoors let us go back again home. I knew smoke-
jacks, but never saw a turnspit at work ; what is left of the old
kitchen fittings, and what of the laundry implements of my
youth 1 Does anyone dolly clothes ? or do we find we can wear
them out fast enough by boiling them with strong chemicals 1 Do
laundresses now amuse themselves with gofering machines 1 or
crimping machines 1 and what has become of the old array 1 The
modern mangle is a poor toy in comparison with the old box
filled with river pebbles, which was forced backwards and for-
wards by a strap passing over a wheel : even in my time that was
giving place to the first patent, in which a chain replaced the
ricketty strap, and the reversing action was automatic, with a
noise which rivalled a steam roller !
I don't like to talk about tools lest I should display my ignor-
ance ; for instance, I have not seen a flail for thirty years, but
am not sure that it is not used still for some kinds of seeds,
though not for corn. About spinning and weaving I am on some-
what surer ground. Perhaps the earliest of all human inventions
was that of a spindle and whorl to help twist thread, but, though
it is still used by wayfarers in India, and no doubt by savage
tribes all the world over, it has been forgotten in this country for
many generations ; yet of its remote descendant, the spinning
wheel, how many genuine specimens, wheels not made to meet a
fad of the last three years, can be found round the country 1 and
how many specimens of the old hand-loom, working, I believe, in
every house in this neighbourhood in the youth of men still living,
so that, I am told, its rattJe gave a nickname to the villages about
White's Hill and Randwick 1 Three years ago the Vicar of Uley
told us at Dursley that one was still to be found at work in his
parish ; as a loom implies yarn, I wish I had asked how the old
weaver furnished himself with that. In the Manchester Ex-
hibition of 1887, I wanted to explain the working of a loom to
my boy, but there were only two handlooms, both for silk, both
326 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
hampered with such a multitude of healds that I could make no
headway.
About means of locomotion I had better say nothing ; a stage-
coach is too big for any museum, and I don't know that any
detached bit could be worth keeping. A sedan chair I have once
seen put to good account by being fitted up as a china cupboard ;
two or three were to be hired in Shrewsbury when I was a boy,
and a very smart one is still in use at the Pumproom Hotel in Bath.
But how about packsaddles ? Once, when I was walking up the
hill towards Rodborough, an old man pointed out the line of the
old road up which packhorses scrambled in his boyhood ; I could
not believe his point of time, but a century back I fancy most of
the Stroud valley cloth made its way to market by such means ;
are any packsaddles left 1 and could any one properly charge
them ? A packsaddle is a more ticklish thing to load than a
railway van.
If I had been writing this paper for any other town I might
have been tempted to ask if there are any relics of the trappings
used in falconry ; but in Stroud I should be sharply pulled up by
Major Fisher's assurance that falconry is neither a dead nor a
decaying sport. But, as cock-fighting has now been illegal for
some 40 years I trust we may speak of its ancient popularity and
wide prevalence as extinct ; 1 if we cannot find any of the " fair
silver spurs " of the past, have any of the fair steel ones escaped 1
Now I have a practical end in view in this short paper ; our
Society is concerned, not only with antiquities of pre-historic
and mediaeval times, but also with those of our own ; and I want
to instigate people to treasure up the relics of old fittings with
the object of keeping a plain memory of their uses. I think people
would be surprised if they could realise with how frail a tenure
we hold most of our handicrafts ; in spite of the vast mass of
printed books which load our shelves, I am convinced that print-
ing would be lost, and would need slow re-discovery, if all towns
1 After I had written this pious hope, my friend, Chancellor Ferguson,
sent me his paper on Cock-fighting, wherefrom I learn that a late dignitary
at Carlisle kept his cocks and cockpit up to his death, some 10 years back ;
and that the sport still lingers in the county ; mains are still fought for
£100 a side !
On Old Tools and Implements. 327
could perish at once. I may conclude with a story which will show
how a useful art may be lost ; fifty years ago, the iron of the
Sone valley was smelted by aid of bellows built up of big leaves
pinned together with thorns ; great search was made for a speci-
men to be sent home for the Exhibition of 1851, only one
imperfect specimen could be found, and either funds or skill were
wanting to repair it, or make a new one. Now the art is lost
beyond recall.
328 Transactions fok thf. Year 1889-90,
SEVENHAMPTON.1
By the Rev. JOHN MELLAND HALL, M.A.
Rector of Harescombe with Pitchcombe.
Although the name suggests a Saxon settlement there is no
record, so far as I am aware, of Sevenhampton, previous to that
contained in the Domesday Survey of 1086. It is there mentioned
as a portion of the lands appertaining to the Church of Hereford
(' Terra Eccl'e cle Hereford '), and in connection with Prestbury,
with which, as it was in a different Hundred, it would appear to
have become in some unknown manner incorporated.
It is recorded —
" In Cheltenham Hundred, the bishop of Hereford holds
Presteberie. There are 30 hides. In Demesne 3 plough tillages,
18 villeins, and 5 bordarii with 8 plough teams. There is a priest
and a Radchenist with 2 plough teams, and in Winchcombe a
burgess rendering 18d , and of serfs, male and female, eleven.
There are 20 acres of meadow, and a wood a league in length and
half a league in breadth."
" To this manor is adjoined a Ville Sevenhamtone outside this
hundred [of Cheltenham]. Here are 20 hides of the aforesaid 30
hides, and there are 2 plough teams, and 21 villeins with 11
plough teams. There are also 3 free men having 7 plough teams
together with their own men. Durand [the Sheriff of Gloucester]
holds three of these 20 hides of the bishop. The whole manor was
worth twelve pounds in the time of King Edward ; now sixteen
pounds. This manor Robert bishop of the same city holds."
The bishop referred to, was, I suppose, Robert of Lorraine,'2
who died in 1095, and whose tomb is to be seen in the Cathedral
1 This Paper was prepared for the Cheltenham Meeting, 1S89, but the
Society could not visit the Church through want of time on the day arranged.
2 He was the 28th Bishop of Hereford, and died June, 1095, and lieth
buried in the south side of the High Altar under an arch of freestone in the
north wall of that aisle bearing the following inscription " Dominus
Robertus Lozing Ejhis." Herefordensis obiit, a.p. 1095. — Havergal's Cath.
Church of Hereford, p. 2.
Sevenhampton. 329
of Hereford. This appears to have been all the land held in this
county of Gloucester by the bishops of Hereford. It will be
noticed that the value of the manor is said to have been £16,
instead of £12 as in the reign of the Confessor — an improvement
in value, which is quite exceptional, as a depreciation was the
rule almost everywhere else.
The present area of Prestbury is 3022 acres, and of Seven-
hampton 3325 acres, so that it would appear that the latter was
in much better cultivation than the former, unless the extent of
wood-land made the difference — for reckoning the hide as 120
acres, only 1200 acres were in cultivation at Prestbury out of the
3022, as against 2400 out of the 3325 acres at Sevenhampton.
"The rating of the ten hides," says Mr. Taylor, " is a low one,
having regard to the area of the manor and the number of tenants :'
but at Sevenhampton the area of the hide was small and the
district possessed an average population."
Possibly the three hides held by Durand may represent the lands
possessed by Lanthony Priory here : as Mr. Taylor says in his
Analysis — " Durandus seems generally to have kept what he had,"1
and as Milo of Gloucester, one of his successors, was the founder
of the new Lanthony, near that city, it^s likely enough that these
three hides formed a portion of the endowment :2 or it may even
have been the succeeding bishop, Robert de Betun, who having
been formerly their prior, bestowed many benefits upon the new
house. Doubtless they had other benefactors here, for we learn
that Lanthony (by the gift of one Ernalcl of Bannebury, confirmed
by his son Ralph) had 2 virgates of land in Prestbury and half a
hide in Callecombe in Sevenhampton, and that the said Ernald
had these by the gift of Walter de Forthington at a certain rent,
but the services to the bishop, on Ernald's land thus granted to
the priory, were carefully preserved. I am afraid the priory was
sometimes ungrateful to the bishops of Hereford for the benefits
bestowed upon them, for in 1289 we meet with a record of the
settlement of a dispute concerning 5 acres of ' Fforloteland ' near
Prestbury claimed by the bishop ; the prior, on his side, claiming
1 Analysis of the Domesday Survey of Gloucestershire, p. 156.
2 See ante p. 319.
330 Transactions for the Year 18S9-90.
a croft of pasture at Sevenhampton, lying between the land of the
bishop and that of his bailiff Gyrard — also a right of depasturing
their 8 oxen, with the bishop's oxen, in the park of Prestbury and
elsewhere, granted by his predecessors, Hugh Foliot and Ralph de
Maydenstone.
The Household Roll of the same prelate (Richard Swinfield),
published by the Camden Society, contains many interesting par-
ticulars. We have a picture of 13th century life presented to
us — Christmas was to be kept at Prestbury. Robert Calewe, a
servant, had been sent from Bosbury, another of the bishop's
manors, to superintend the burning of charcoal, and a great
brewing of ale. Calewe was assisted by hired female brewers,
and the malt, we learn, was a mixture of wheat barley and oats.
In due season the bishop's hounds were taken on to Prestbury
to be ready for his use on his arrival. The park was well stocked
with deer, and there was much game in the extensive woods
of his manor. Then we have an account of other preparations —
the repairs of the kitchen and oven — the baker and his assistants
ready beforehand — the bishop's arrival — the number of horses,
forty-one to fifty-five — the Christmas feast and the provision
required. On his return from London the bishop remained
at this manor for nearly a month : intercourse with Gloucester
seems to have been frequent : it was their principal market :
the cook and butler went thither as purveyors, and thence
they drew their supplies of fish. The number of horses, varying
on different nights, implies a resort of visitors to the manor
house. During this visit a warren in the park was made, also
a sort of drawbridge over a moat or trench.1 The same roll
and appendix give us some account of the bishop's bailiff, Gyrard
de Ugina, for whom he seems to have had considerable regard.
When Gyrard was about to visit France, he made over to the
bishop, in the event of his death, all his lands in Prestbury and
Sevenhampton, which it is expressly said he had justly acquired
for himself and then possessed in fee in " our Manor of Prestbury
and Sevenhampton." 2
1 Cf. " Gloucestershire Notes and Queries," Vol. I., p. 336.
2 " Sevenampton.
Item Episcopus Hereford' tenet Sevenampton que pertinet ad Baroniam
suam."— Kirby's Quest, 1283-6. (See Trans., Vol. XI., p. 144.)
Sevenhamptox. 331
There is an entry on the Charter Rolls, 5th John (1204), shew-
ing that half a hide here belonged to one Ralph, then to Philip,
and John the Clerk and his sons, afterwards to Philip Sintelf by
their grant, and twelve or thirteen years later (18th John, 1217)
Ralph Musard, then Sheriff, was commanded to give seizin of the
Manors of Prestbury and Sevenhampton belonging to the Bishop
of Hereford, to Walter de Lacy, for the rebuilding of the castle
at Hereford.1
Brockhampton, which forms a considerable portion of this
parish, is not mentioned in Domesday : it was most probably
included in Sevenhampton, and not in Prestbury. It occurs in
an early record, as " Brockhampton in the Wold," whilst in the
Subsidy Roll of 1st Edw. III. (1327) it takes precedence of Seven-
hampton, and the entry is for ' Brohampton cum Sevenhampton ' :
21 names occur, and the amount of subsidy paid is 40s. 2^d.
Prestbury does not appear to have paid anything on this occasion.
From the None Rolls Ed. 111.(1340), we learn that Sevenhampton
was assessed at 161 marcs for the ninth sheaf, fleece and lamb, i.e.
£11 6s. 8d., but from this was to be deducted £6 7s. 4d., being
£3 10s. for hay and other tythes of the Rector, and two marcs
(£1 6s. 8d.) for two years, £2 13s. 4d., " because that the greater
portion of the arable land lay uncultivated on account of the
inability of the inhabitants to cultivate it."2
This seems (but the Nones appear earlier) to refer to the
Great Pestilence which desolated the country, and caused a scarcity
of labour for the cultivation of land, and of artisans to construct
or repair the implements of husbandry. In one year there was
a great reduction in prices, which in the next were increased
four-fold. Knyghton mentions the following as exorbitant wages
— a mower, a shilling a day with his victuals ; a reaper, eighteen-
pence with the same.3 In consequence an Act of Parliament was
passed to regulate wages.4
Among the parcels granted off by the Bishop (Costello) is a
site for a Church House in Sevenhampton, in 19th Henry VII.
1 Close Rolls. - Nonarum Inquisitiones, p. 414.
3 We must bear in mind that money was of ten times the value it is now.
4 Act 25 Edw. Ill, Cap. 1 and 2.- Lingard, Vol. III., p. 79.
332 Transactions for the Year 1S89-90.
(1504) — the deed (now in the possession of the owner of the pro-
perty) is interesting, as it gives the names of the principal
inhabitants at that period : viz. , Thos. Morton, Clerk, Rich.
Wenman, John Hawkins, John Watts, Rich. Mason, Will. Yonge,
Will. Townsend, Will. Rymall, John Mason, and Thos. Grove.
An account rendered by the steward of the bishop (temp.
Henry VII. -VIII.) gives many particulars as to rents, etc. The
quarries were used by the Abbot of Winchcombe, the Prior of
Lanthony and others. Rents of Assize, i.e. of free and customary
tenants, £18 6s. 10|d ; " Sennyngton Meadow," said to be kept in
hand for sheep ; gradual inclosures are traceable.
In 1549 we find a lease of the manor granted by the bishop to
Richard Willyson for ninety years : he assigned it in 1553 to
Willliam Wenman, of Fringford, co. Oxon ; and in 1568 it passed
to Stephen Hales, who in the following year transferred his
interest to Robert Lawrence, of Shipton.
In 1562, Scory, then Bishop of Hereford, granted the Manors
of Sevenhampton and Brockhampton to Queen Elizabeth in ex-
change for other estates. During the time that Queen Elizabeth
was Lady of the Manor, certain tenants for a fine of £5 were
permitted to enclose lands, the schedule of which is signed by
Richard Pate, steward of the manor. He was the founder of the
Grammar School, at Cheltenham. In the same reign (18th Eliz.)
lands in Sevenhampton, Brockhampton, and Clopley, viz., Hattars,
Colynes, Reeves, &c, lately belonging to the Bishop of Hereford,
were granted to Sir Christopher Hatton.1 In 1590 the same Queen,
by Letters Patent, granted to Thomas Crompton, Robert Wright,
and Giles Meyrick (trustees for Robert Devereux, Earl of Essex—
Meyrick was his steward, and was afterwards executed, together
with him, for complicity in his treason) all her manors of Seven-
hampton and Brockhampton, late the property of the Bishop of
Hereford, with rents of assize, customary rents, scite of manor
house, and demesne, court baron, view of frank pledge, free warren,
fairs, markets, tolls, customs, and all appurtenances.
In 1591 Crompton and others assigned their interest to Sir
Thomas Throckmorton, of Corse, Knight, and Reginald Nicholas,
Pat. Rolls.
Sevenhamptox. 333
of Prestbury. The former moiety passed to William Throckmor-
ton, of Tortworth, Esq., son of Sir Thomas, by gift, who in 1608
purchased the Nicholas moiety from Reginald Nicholas and Thos.
Nicholas, Esq., of Stratton, his son, and conveyed the manors and
their appurtenances to Anthony Lawrence, son of Robt. Lawrence,
of Shipton, from which time it is said the manors of Sevenhampton
and Brockhampton have remained in the blood of the Lawrence
family.
In 34 Edward III., Walter Frenche, of Brockhampton in the
Wold, granted all his lands in Brockhampton, Whitehall and
Clopley to William House and John le Eyr in fee. Two of
the witnesses being John Solers, of Shipton Solers, and John
de Upcote (Withington).
In 35 Edward III. Edinunde de Crupes, of Whittington, held
lands in Brockhampton in capite.
In 11 Richard II., Robert Coles, of Northleach, grants to Thomas
le Frenche of Brockhampton in the Wold} a parcel of wood
called Anneys Wood, lying between Puckcombe and Nash
Quarry, abutting on the Bishop of Hereford's land and
extending to the King's highway leading to Stowe, and in
8 Henry VI., the same Thomas le Frenche, Clerk, grants all his
lands in Brockhampton, Clopley, Whitewell and the Grove,
called Agney's Wood to Walter Baker, of Winchcombe.
There is a crown grant of a messuage and 200 acres in Brock-
ington to Thomas Dutton, surveyor of crown lands in Gloucester-
shire, to be held of the manor of Prestbury.
In 14th Car. I. (1639,) Paul Pert, Esq., Comptroller of the
King's Counting House, bought lands here of Anthony Lawrence,
and built Brockhampton House on Ford Hey, purchased from
Thomas Chandler, in the 15th year of that King. This estate
he demised by will to Ann Skipwith, his niece ; she married
Ralph Dodwell, Paul, son and heir, who married Dame Elizabeth,
only daughter of William Rogers, Esquire, and relict of Sir
Walter Raleigh, Knight., both of Sandiwell ; their eldest son
William Dodwell, afterwards Sir William Dodwell, Knight.,
1 Vide Bigland's Continuation by Sir Thos. Phillipps, Bart., in loco.
Vol. XIV. y
334 Transactions foe, the Year 1SS9 90.
married twice, viz. — 1st. Anne, eldest daughter of Sir John
Lethieullier, of Lewisham, in the County of Kent, Knight, relict
of John Deleau, of Whaddon, co. Surrey, Esq., no issue ; 2nd.
Mary, daughter of Francis Fuller, Esq., and relict of Thomas
Miller, Esq., by whom there was a daughter Mary ; in 1746
she married Thomas Tracy, whom she long survived ; their only
child, Dodwell Tracy, died unmarried. Mrs. Tracy died leaving
no issue, and intestate. Judith and Patience Timbrell and
Rebecca Lightbourne were found, by verdict of Jury in the Court
of Common Pleas in 1806, to be three of her coheirs. Rebecca
Lightbourne survived her sisters, and from her the estates passed
to William Morris, Esq., and his son, who had assumed the name
of his mother's family, the late Walter Lawrence Lawrence, Esq.,
of Sevenhampton Manor. Brockhampton Park and the adjoining
estate became the property of the Craven family at the end of the
last century or the beginning of the present ; now held by Fulwar
Craven, Esq. l The house was greatly enlarged and beautified
about 25 years ago.
THE BENEFICE.
William de Wycombe, fourth prior, and also the Historian of
Lanthony, tells us that in the second year from the time of their
departure from Wales, the bishop transferred the brethren to
Gloucester. He helped them much with his influence and money,
and by reason of his importunity Milo of Gloucester gave them a
piece of land, called the Hyde and in the Charter " the Castelle
Mead," as a site for their new Priory of Lanthony : " as an
additional subsidy (says the same writer) the bishop gave them
the two churches of Frome and Presteberie. Moreover, to the
very end of his life, he made over to them the town of Presteberie,
with all its income." This was Robert de Betun (formerly their
Prior), who became Bishop of Hereford in 1131.
' Presteberie,' at this period, appears to have had two churches
[" unam sub montibus, alteram super montibus "] the one ' super
montibus ' (on the hills) being the church or chapel of this ville of
Sevenhampton, and the tithes of this ville (with the exception of
2 Died since this paper was written viz. Jan. 19th, 1890.
£9
6
8
1
15
4
1
13
4
Seven ha mptox. 333
two portions of the tythe of the demesne, given to the Dean and
Precentor of Hereford) were allotted by him to the new Lanthony.
The office of Precentor in the Cathedral of Hereford is said to
have been created cir. 1199, but the Register of Lanthony Priory
contains a charter of Robert Bishop of Hereford addressed to
Symon Bishop of Worcester — in which mention is made of the
Precentor — the date of which must not be later than 1148, in
which year the former died, the latter in 1149.
In 1291 (Pope Nicholas' Taxation) we have the following
values :
Ecclesia de Sevenhampton
Item, porcio Decani de Hereford
Item, porcio Precentoris de Hereford
It is this, I imagine, which guides Fosbrooke, Avho writes
"This parish was parcel of Prestbury, but was created separate,
before 1291."
Lanthony Prioi-y had license, 21st Ric. II. (1398), to appro-
priate Prestbury, but " the portion " of a vicar is mentioned in
1291. The Priory of Lanthony was surrendered to the Crown,
29th Henry VIII. (1538), when its value was returned as
£748 Os. Hid.
In 36th Hen. VIII. (1545), we find a grant on the Patent Roll 3
to William Berners, Esq., one of the King's auditors, and his
heirs, of all the manor and messuage and farm of Sevehampton
alias Sevenhampton ; all our rectory and church, with all its rights
and members now in the tenure or occupation of Roger Fowler,
yeoman, and lately belonging to the Monastery or Priory of
Lanthony, near our city of Gloucester. The Advowson, of the
Vicarage of the Parochial Church of Sevehampton,4 otherwise
Sevenhampton ; also all houses, buildings, lands, tenements,
pastures, grazings, tithes, oblations, obventions, and all other
profits and emoluments whatsoever ; and the wood, called Prior s
1 Taxatio Ecclesiastica, p. 223. - Fosbrooke, Vol. II , p. 444.
3 Patent Roll, 31 Hen. VIII., pt. 13, m. so.
4 It will be noticed that a Vicarage is here mentioned, although no
assignment of a vicarage has, so far, been found in the Bishop's Registers at
Worcester.
Y 2
336 Transactions for the Year 1SS9-90.
Grove, containing 1\ acres — all to be held in free socage as of our
Manor of Standysshe in the said co. of Gloucester.
This grantee sold the Rectory and Advowson in the following
year to Joanna Davys, widow, from whom, in 1563, it passed by
1 It appears from the documents in the Appendix {post) that the Bishop
of Hereford in 1135 granted, inter alia, the Church of Sevenhampton with
all the tithes, except as excepted, to the Prior and Canons of Lanthony
(No. 303) which gi-ant was confirmed by the Consistorial Court of Worcester
in 1275 (No. 71), and the Dean Rural of Winchcombe was commanded to
induct the said Prior and Canons into the said church and to defend their
right therein.
The Prior and Canons of an Augustinian Priory had authority to act as
Ordinary by delegation, and being in absolute possession it was optional
with them whether they would personally perform the ministerial duties, or
assign a vicarage, or appoint a chaplain. They evidently elected the former
course, for there is no institution to a vicarage, or license to a chaplain, to
be found in the Episcopal Registers at Worcester down to the dissolution of
the priory.
The Augustinian Priory of Lanthony was surrendered by Prior Richard
Hempsted, alias Hart, with 21 canons, on 10th May, 1539, and by Letters
Patent, dated 25th March, 1545, the King granted, inter alia, to William
Berners, Esq., one of the auditors of the Court of Augmentation, the manor,
messuage and farm of Sevenhampton, together with the rectory and church
with all their rights, members and appurtenances heretofore belonging to
the Priory of Lanthony lately dissolved, and the advowson, donation and
free disposal and right of presentation to the vicarage of the parish church.
To have, hold, and enjoy the said manorial rights, rectory, advowsons, &c,
tithes, oblations, obventions, &c. , with their appurtenances to the said
William Berners, his heirs and assigns for ever to the private use of the said
William Berners for ever, liable to all rents, services, &c, to be held as
fully and entirely as the last Prior of Lanthony enjoyed the same.
After the grant by the King to William Berners, he and his successors
would seem to have concluded from the fulness of the grant that they stood
in the same relation to the church as did the prior and canons, and from
that time the church would appear to have been treated as a donative ; the
stipend of the minister, viz., ten pounds, being paid by the owners of the
Impropriate Rectory, as a charge on the same.
Joshua Aylworth, Esq., b}r deed dated 1st April, 1715, demised his
manor of Aylworth, &c, to trustees to pay £800 in equal proportions to
four parishes of which Sevenhampton was one, for the augmentation of the
income of the respective incumbents. This would seem to have produced a
revenue of £10 per annum.
Upon an application being made to the Governors of Queen Anne's
Bounty in 1733 for an augmentation to the stipend of the clergyman, the
bishop certified it to be a curacy with a stipend of £10 a year, and accord-
ingly a further sum of £200 was granted by the Governors. And whether a
donative or chapelry this grant of the Governors would at once convert it
into a perpetual cure under the Act of 1st George I., cap. 10, sec. 4. — Ed.
Sevexhamptox. 337
purchase to William Wenman and Thomas Chandler, after which
came a partition into severalty. Wenman's moiety, passing in
1569 to Stephen Hales by purchase, and afterwards in the same
manner to Robert Lawrence, in whose descendants it remained.
As for Chandler's moiety, it continued in that family for awhile,
viz., until circa 1625, when it passed to Joseph Hinckesman.
THE PARSONAGE HOUSE.
The present Parsonage House was built in 1850, or there-
abouts : at the sole cost, as it is said, (with the exception of a
grant of <£200 by Queen Anne's Bounty Board) of the Rev.
Edward Ellerton, D.D., Fellow of Magdalen College, Oxford ;
joint founder of the Pusey and Ellerton Hebrew Scholarships in
that University ; and for the space of twenty- six years Perpetual
Curate of Sevenhampton.
A Terrier of Lands in the Bishop's Registry at
Gloucester.
Anno Dofn. 1683.
The Account of Lands given to the use of the church of Saint
Andrew in the Parish of Sevenhampton in the County of Glou-
cester.
On the 20th of September in the nineteenth yeare of the
Raigne of King Henry the Seventh, [1504], was given on*", parcell
of wast ground lying between the High way and the Church yard,
36 foot in length, and 21 foot in breadth, to build a House
called a Church House there, for the use of the Church of St.
Andrew in the foresaid p'sh of Sevenhampton by Hadrian Castell
then lord Bishop of Hereford as appeareth by an Indenture in
our possession — Paying to the lord of the Mannor one halfpenny
at the Feast of St. Michael yearly.
There is no other Lands or anything else as we know of given
to Pious or Charitable use in. our P'ish.
WILLIAM LONGFORD, *
tTTTT.TTA,r ,-r-r^^ vChnrclwmrdens.
WILLIAM NIND, J
Approved by me,
CHARLTON BARK SD ALE,
Curate
Examined
29 Oct., 1683.
338 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
Joshua Aylworth, Esq., of Aylworth, in this County, by deed
bearing date April 1, 1715, demised his manor and estate of
Aylworth, to Aylworth Freeman and Thomas Aylworth, Gent.,
in trust ; amongst other legacies, he bequeathed towards the
augmentation of the spiritual income of ye several poor benefices
of ye several towns or Hamlets of Charlton Abbots, Cold Salper-
ton, Sevenhampton and Compton Abdale, all lying in the County
of Gloucester, ye sum of Two Hundred Pounds to each said
town or hamlet, to be laid out by the said Trustees, or the Sur-
vivor of them in ye most prudent manner, as a Perpetual
additional maintenance for ye respective Incumbents for ye time
being ... in a purchase to be made of Lands in Fee Simple."
This sum of £800 was accordingly laid out by the said
Trustees in the purchase of lands lying within the manor of
Cheltenham. — Lansdown MSS. — No. OSS. British Museum.
In 1733, the benefice was further augmented by the bequest
of £200 by Sir William Dodwell, of Brockhampton, Knight, met
by a corresponding grant of £200 from Queen Anne's Bounty.
By the " Sevenhampton Enclosure Act.," the tythes were
commuted for land in 1818, when 217a. 3r. 13p. were allotted to
the Lawrence family, then represented by William Morris (in right
of his wife), and 221a. Or. 39p. to the Hinckesmans. At the
same time, the portions of tythe belonging to the Dean and
Precentor of Hereford were commuted for 77a. 3r. 28p. Thus
making a total of 517 acres, which represented the ancient pro-
vision made for the service of God within this parish.
The seventy-seven acres then allotted to the Dean and Pre-
centor of Hereford having been acquired by the Ecclesiastical
Commissioners, and sold by them, they have been enabled to re-
store to the benefice, the produce of this portion of its long
alienated possessions — alienated for at least seven hundred years !
POPULATION.
The following Table shews the population of the parish at two
dates in the 18th century, and at each decennial period when the
census has been taken in the 19th century : —
Sev
EXHAMPTOX.
Population.
1700
(Atkyns)
-
180
1770
(Rudder)
-
288
1801
-
-
349
1802
-
-
354
1811
-
-
334
1821
-
-
386
1831
-
-
465
1811
-
-
471
1851
-
-
553
1861
-
-
543
1871
-
-
526
1881
.
-
512
339
THE CHURCH.
The Church is dedicated to St. Andrew. Sir Robert Atkyns,
in his History of Gloucestershire, states that Sevenhampton
Church was built by John Camber, who died in 1447, and lies
buried in the chancel. This has been repeated by other writers.
The late Rev. J. L. Petit says that from this statement he
expected to find that most valuable thing — a church of one
style, and of a certain date. He was consequently much disap-
pointed when having made a pilgrimage to it, a glance shewed
him that Atkyns had made a mistake, and that the architecture
of the church ranged from Early English, of a very rude character,
to a debased Perpendicular.
Nevertheless (he remarks) it
is a building of great interest,
and no doubt a considerable
part of it, especially the cen-
tral tower and south porch,
the outer door of which has
the tracery of the spandrels
pierced, belongs to the date
assigned. The front of the
south transept has a triplet
of lancets, and the chancel
Fig. 14. Sevenhampton Church. has likewise indications of
Early English. The north transept has a late Decorated window,
and the chancel some early Perpendicular work introduced. But
340
Transactions foe the Year 1SS9-90.
the principal feature is the curious insertion of the central tower.
On approaching the church
it seems of very good dimen-
sions, yet it is considerably ,
narrower than the nave. Its
western piers consequently ;
are detached (though there $
are no aisles to the church) 4&
and as they are not very mas-
sive, they are strengthened
by flying buttresses in the ||
interior from the piers to the
corresponding angles between
the nave and transepts. Fig. 15 Interior of Sevenhampton Church Tower.
The tower is open to the interior considerably above the roof of
the transepts, and has a north and south window ; above, there is
a vaulted roof, with angel corbels with shields. Neither these
windows nor the belfry windows have their lights foliated, though
the latter are of very good composition. The tower presents a
fine bold outline, from the stair-turret at the south-east angle. The
south porch is close to the transept, which has a string-course rest-
ing on brackets on its west side, stopped by the face of the porch.
Sir Stephen Glynne writes : " This is a small cruciform church
having a central tower and no aisles. The greater part is Perpen-
dicular, but there is earlier work in the chancel which has single
lancets on the north and south — the latter of a lychnoscopic
character, and with rebate for a shutter. The eastern window is
Perpendicular of three lights, and there is one Perpendicular
window on the north and south next the eastern end, with some
fair old stained glass. The external wall at the eastern end shews
that the original east window was an Early English triplet — (this,
I think, is now to be found in the south transept ; it has shafts
internally ; and the contrast is great between the plainness of the
exterior and the gracefulness of the interior ;) on the east of this
transept is a late square-headed window of two lights ; there is a
similar window in the north transept, which also has a good
Sevenhampton, 341
Decorated two-light window on its north. The transepts have
moulded parapets. The windows of the nave are Perpendicular of
two lights, some square headed. The arrangement of the tower
is very singular, as it does not fill up the width of the transepts ;
the north and south arches are very small and narrow, and con-
nected with the western tower piers by flying buttresses ; they
leave a wall space next the chancel. The tower, above the arches,
is open as a lanthorn, having Perpendicular windows of two lights.
The arches are all continuous without capitals, and of plain Per-
pendicular character, though not corresponding in size. The
tower, externally, has a battlement and octagonal stair turret at
the south- east. There is a pointed arched door to the tower stairs
opening from the south transept : " these stairs formerly communi-
cated with the rood loft, as a now blocked up doorway shows.
There is no piscina now visible in the church, — though doubt-
less originally possessing at least its three altars, viz., at the east
end, and in the two transepts. There is a passage — ambulatory —
between the north transept and the chancel — it is too large, I
suppose, for a Hagioscope, though probably it also served as such ;
the stone slab forming the roof is, 1 believe, the ancient altar stone,
some of the original five crosses are still tangible, though by
reason of the pews not easily seen. There is a round-headed
priest's door on the south. There is an ancient stone shelf which
is interesting, as it shews the height of the original altar, and the
floor level. The elevation of the altar, by a succession of steps,
was not common in the early days of the church of our fathers,
but the change in this respect was gradually made. The church
of Dowdeswell, which is of late date, is an example of the new
mode of giving dignity to the altar by raising it much above the
level of the nave. "A frontell for the schelfe standyng on the
Altar, of blue sarsenet, with brydds of golde, &c." is mentioned
in the Churchwardens' Accounts, St. Mary at Hill, in 1486. There
is an early buttress at the west end.
The county histories gave no account of the John Camber
mentioned in connection with this church, so that there was much
conjecture concerning him. However I was fortunate enough to
342 Transactions for the Year 1839-90.
discover his will, dated Sept. 15th, 1496, in the Probate Court
Registry at Somerset House, a few years ago. It is written in
the English of the period : " I bequeathe my soule to Almyghte
God, oure lady Saint Mary and to all the Hallowes of heven, and
my body to be buried within that Holy Churche in whatsoever
Parishe it shall so tyme me to decease : And I bequeathe to
the same churche werke that my bodye shalbe buried in, Cs."
To the curate of the same to pray for his soule, 6s 8d. To
every priest that shall be at the Dirige and Mass at his burying, 8d.
There is no description of his occupation or place of abode,
but the next clause of the will suggests that his domicile was in
the City of Worcester, and I think we shall not be very far
wrong if we take him to have been a wealthy wool merchant who
periodically visited the Cotteswolds for the purposes of his business.
" Two honeste prestes that be quere (choir) men to help the
quere," were to be appointed by his executors, to sing and pray
for his soul " within the parish churche of Saint Andrew in
Worcester, by the space of two yeres, to either of them £6 by the
yere.'
To the Friars Preachers at Worcester to pray for his soul 20s,
and a like sum to the Convent of Grey Friars in that city.
His "Month's mind" was to be kept within St. Andrew's
church — every priest present at Dirige and Mass to have 6d.,
every parish clerk 2d, and " every other childe that may be at
Dirige and Mass, ld." The same clay no less than 100s was to be
distributed amongst " poore people .... to every pore woman
and childe, one penny." For the marriage portion of maidens in
the same city within a year of his decease, 68 8d each. Various
bequests to cousins and others ; 40s to his servant who had ap-
parently assumed his name -,1 to his executors, Master Thomas
Morton, Sir Richard Gardiner, and Sir John Sindithurst : the
whole residue of his goods to be disposed of " after their discretion
and minds for the welthe " of his soul.
This will was proved in the Court of the Archbishop at Lam-
beth within two yeais of its date, viz., May 5th, 1498: so that
any new work in this church must have been subsequent to that
year.
1 It is more probable that the servant was a relation. A practice very
common at the date of the will. — Ed.
PLATE XIX.
Seven HAMPToy. 343
The window on the north side of the chancel contains some
fragments of stained glass, in which the initials J.C. or T.C. can
be traced ; in the quatrefoil there is a device of a ram.
MONUMENTS.
On the chancel floor in front of the altar is a small brass 30ins.
by 13ins. The feet and inscription were, for many years, concealed
by a step. The step has recently been removed and the inscription
disclosed. It is as follows, the words being here extended : " Hie
jacet Johannes Camber qui obiit vicesimo sexto die mensis ffebruarii
Anno Domini m°ccccxcvii°. cujus anime propicietur Deus. Amen."
{Plate XIX.) This inscription affords an early example of the
modern method of writing the number ninety ; viz., 100 minus
10, it having been more usual at that date to write it lxxxx.
The costume of the figure would indicate that the deceased
belonged to the grade of a well-to-do yeoman or merchant. His
hair is full and long, covering the ears, and is cut so as to form a
fringe extending almost to the eye-brows, with no appearance of
beard, whisker, or moustache. He wears a tunic which reaches
below the ankles. It opens down the front, but in this case it is
closed, though the mode of fastening is not shewn. At the waist
it is confined by a wide girdle from which depends, on the left
side a gypciere, and on the right a tasselled rosary. The sleeves
are long and loose, wider at the wrists than at the elbows, the
collar is a narrow band. The tunic covers the fastening, if any,
of the shoes, which are pointed, a fashion which was soon super-
seded by broad round toes. Over the right shoulder is thrown a
hood, which consists of a cap resembling a Scotch bonnet, and to
it is attached a long streamer, or scarf, which reaches below the
knees, and is sometimes called a liripipe, which was used for
wrapping round the head when required. The figure is repre-
sented full faced, with the hands joined in the attitude of prayer.
The brass is in excellent preservation.1
The chancel contains some quaint epitaphs of the 17th century.
That to the memory of William Chandler, who held a moiety of
the impropriation, is as follows :
1 For further information see Haines's Manual, Vol. II., page 69, and
Davis's Brasses of Gloucestersliire, No. xxxix.
344 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
" Subtus dormit qd extingui potuit Gvlielmi Candelarii de
Senhampton, pie demortui xxvi. Jan. Anno. MDCLI. JEtat LVII."
MS.
" Lumine Mors corpus spoliavit terra recondit,
Splendet adhuc nomen, mens pia splendet idem
Lucerit hoc olim Corpus Lumenque videbit
Non obcfecandum Lumine (Christe) tuo."
English Poetical Version ( W.H.S.)
" His light is quench'd, his earth to earth consign'd —
Yet shines his name, yet shines his godly mind :
And e'en his body shall one day be bright,
And in Christ's Light, for ever shall see light."
The play upon the name Chandler running throughout will be
remarked.
On a wooden tablet, on the north wall of the chancel is a
memorial of the Carter Family, of Charlton Abbots.
Arms — Checquy arg. and sable, on a bend gules three escallofys or.
(Partridge).
Crest— Out of a ducal coronet a horse's head arg., ducally gorged
or.
Heic altum dormit inter agnatos
Cineres, Anna Perdkia Stirpe Antiqua,
et memoranda, uxor Joh. Aurigarii
de Charltonia ex Abbate. Gen.
Supra morem Fida, Prudens, Pia.
Demortua Feb. xxi ( Sal. mdclii
Anno \ /Etat. lvi.
MS.
Qua? fuit feterna in terris dignissima fama
Terra (qua potuit parte jacere) jacet,
Mens ccelo demissa solo de terra cuducas
Ruperat exuvias la?ta reditque domum.
Abijt, non Obijt.
In the churchyard, near the chancel door, may be seen an
ancient coffin-lid, and the fragment of an effigy, probably a lady.
The former measures 6ft. Gins, in length, 30ins. at the head, and
20ins. at the foot. It is slightly coped, and shews traces of a
raised Calvary Cross. The head of the effigy is represented rest-
ing on a cushion Both supposed to be of 13th century date.
Sevenhamptox. 345
THE CHURCH BELLS.
There are three bells in the Tower with the following in-
scriptions : —
1 BE -YEE-FOLLOWARES- OF -GOD- AS • DE ARE -CHILDREN. \qqi :„
W. • CHANDLER ■ 1650. J 2
2 ►£■ SANCTE § GABRIEL § ORA § PRO § NOBIS. 32 ill.
3 IOHN TIMBRELL, CHURCHWARDEN, A. R. 1718. 341 in.
These Bells are of more than usual interest. To the epigraph on the first
bell, Mr. Ellacombe has appended the following note/ —
Before and after the date are impressions of a spurious Jewish Shekel,
such as are still made for sale. The devices are corrupt followings of those
on the true shekel, and the inscriptions the same, but in the square charac-
ter instead of the original " Old Hebrew " or Samaritan.
Obv. — A cup (cup of manna or wine cup) and the words 7J$4W 7pt£7
(shekel of Israel).
Rev. — A branch with leaves and fruit (olive ? Aaron's rod ? ) and the words
rittHpii D^l^^V (Jerusalem the Holy).
These sham shekels were figured and described as real by the numis-
matics of the 17th century, and are still to be bought in London, fresh from
the mint. They have become more and more debased in character, but in the
earliest and best of them the imposture is as evident as it would be in an
imitation of a coin of Edward I., made about twice the size, and with the
inscription in modern Roman letters.
I am indebted to the kind courtesy of the Rev. J. T. Fowler, of Durham,
for this explanation. (See Notes and Queries, 5th Ser., Vol. IV.)
The second bell is medireval, with the legend in Early Gothic characters.
— Ed.
This is the Gabriel bell which was rung every morning and
evening, and thence called the " day belle" and "Kerfow belle."
The mid-day bell was never rung in England, and the Angelus,
as used abroad, only began in France early in the 16th century.
MURAL PAINTINGS.
There are but few remains, yet I think the whole church was
formerly richly adorned. At the restoration of the south window
in the south transept, preparatory to the insertion of a memorial
by the Walker family (the subject, St. John the Baptist pointing
his disciples to Jesus as the Lamb of God), some mural paintings
were discovered, together with fragments shewing the general
mode of wall treatment — these have been variously described, and
may even now test the ingenuity of some of our members : the
first, on the left, represents a dog and pomegranate ; the second,
346 Transactions for the Year 1SS9-90.
on the same side, probably the Annunciation, and the lily stem
bearing its three white flowers, open and in full bloom ; the third,
on the right, the head of an angel. It has been suggested, how-
ever, that " the dog, arrow and tree seem to be a portion of a
hunting scene, whilst beneath it, is a portion of an angelic figure
with a scroll, or perhaps it may be a part of the Agony in the
Garden ; the lower subject on the right is said to be a part of the
Descent into Hell."1
During the reign of Edw.VI. Texts of Scripture with borders,
and in black letter, took the place of these frescoes ; the texts, &c,
were defaced in the succeeding reign, that of Mary: Bishop
Bonner's injunctions expressly mentioning this. In the parish
accounts of St. Mary, Devizes, under date 3rd Mary (1555), we
find, " Item, paid for defacing the Scriptures on the walls ij8 iiijd."
INCUMBENTS OR CURATES.
No institutions to this Benefice have hitherto been found in
the Episcopal Registers of Worcester, which date from 1268, but
the Transcripts of the Lanthony Priory Registers, extracts from
which are given in the Appendix, furnish us with the names of
two Rectors : —
Ante 1264, Sir John de Soincot (Sesincot).
Ante 1275, Master Ralph de Pirie.
If reference be made to No. 71 (post p.351) it will be seen that
the Prior and Convent in that year, 1275, succeeded in ousting
the Rector, and altogether appropriating the benefice to them-
selves, no longer content with the portion of forty shillings which
had previously been paid to them by the Rectors, year by year.
Probably the cure of souls was henceforth held by the Canons
themselves : or, the Lessee of their manor might be bound to
provide a Chaplain for the due performance of the divine offices.
In " An Account of the Diocese of Gloucester sent to her
Majestie by Richard, bishop of Gloucester" in 1562, we read : —
Senhampton ^ The parsonage is impropriated, William
ancj I Waineman and William Chandler, pro-
Brokenton. prietaries. No Curate. The number of
Howseholds there are 20.
1 Science and Art Dept., 1885.
Sevenhampton. 347
Subsequently to the Reformation we meet with the following
Curates or Ministers, hut the list is imperfect — no institutions
being requisite.
1551. John Hanley.
1565. Miles Busted.
1584. William Busted.
1594. John White.
1597. Elias Woodroffe.
1599. Nicholas Parry e.
1607. Miles Nicholson.
1619. Robert Williams.
. Foxe.
1634 John Williams.
1662. Thomas Hook.
1673. Dobson.
1676. John Burbyn.
1678. John Farmer.
1681. Charlton Barksdale.
1713. Gerard Clements, B.A.
1723. John Hughes, M.A.
. Petty.
1758. John Lawrence, LL.B.
1S08. William Pearce, M.A.
1825. Edward Ellerton, D.D.
1851. Charles Chambers, M.A.
1862. George A. Holdsworth, M.A.
1868. George E. F. Masters, M.A.
1872. John Melland Hall, M.A.
1879. Henry Venn Hebert, M.A.
A coin of Ceolnoth, Archbishop of Canterbury, A.D. 834, was
discovered either in the churchyard or the vicinity, and is now in
the possession of Mr. C. W. Lawrence. Remains, probably of the
period of the Civil Wars were discovered near the south door of
the nave in the present footpath, about thirty years ago — four
skulls placed closely together, with a portion of a spear or javelin-
head and a stirrup, as if of silver, and quite bright even then — ■
no bones discovered there. A body was found in a stone coffin on
348 Transactions for the Year 1SS9-90.
Oat Hill at the time of the enclosure, a battle axe also near the same
place. Burials on the north side were anciently made without
coffins, sloping stones protecting the head. John Davis, a former
sexton and parish clerk, found in a grave about three feet deep,
three skeletons " all of a heap " (as he put it), which he thought
were in their original position.
There is a tradition of a former village, at a spot known as
" Old Sennington," about half-a-mile to the north-west of the
present church, and as there is a path known as " Church "Walk "
between two rows of hazel trees — the original chapel of Seven-
hampton may have been built there— (destroyed later on, per-
haps in the stormy clays of Stephen), when Milo quarrelled with
the Bishop of Hereford. Remains of foundations may still be
traced all over the ground. A circular spot, known as the
Pigeon House, is close to an old maple tree, which (or its prede-
cessor) may have been a boundary. In making a drain (rather
lower down) ashes were found, and some coins, of which no
account now remains.
The Rev.W. S. Symonds, in "Hanley Castle," gives an extract
from the "Tewkesbury Feoffees Book," which records a singular
fact in connection with the climate of the Cotteswolds :
"Mem. this winter (1634) in the end of January did fall the
greatest snowe that was ever seen in the memory of man, and it
was soe extreme colde and violent and tempestuous, that divers
going home from market and elsewhere, were smothered and
starved to death. And in the August following a greate quan-
titie of the same snowe and ice did remayne at Brock ington
quarre, and divers went purposely to see it, and yett it was a
most extreme hott summer."
A few traditions connected with the Civil Wars still linger
here. A pestilence is said to have broken out among the soldiers,
and the sick were sheltered in an old tithe barn situated a little
to the eastward of the church, and adjoining the present
vicarage ; some skeletons were also discovered on the site of the
Vicarage — numerous burials took place on the north side of the
churchyard, which appears to have been very generally used and
Sevexhampton*. 349
more spacious than that on the south, which has been consider-
ably enlarged of late — in consequence, however, of this pestilence
burials on the north side were long discontinued, except in family
vaults.
APPENDIX.
From Transcripts of the Registers of Lanthony Priory in the
Tluirlestaine Bouse Library.
R[obert], Bishop of Hereford,1 knowing the poverty of the
church of Lanthony, gives to them the church of Prestbury with
its chapels : the church of Frome, land which is called the
' Mora,' the ' Mansio,' which Ernald the presbyter held, with eleven
acres of land.
No. 303.
Robert, Bishop of Hereford, to Symon, Bishop of Worcester :
Because he has known that the possessions of the church of
Lanthony have been greatly diminished by reason of the ravages
of war, he has granted to the Prior thereof two churches in ' Pres-
teburie ', — the one under the hills — the other upon the hills (super
montes) with the tythe thereto appertaining, except two portions
of tythe of his demesne which the Dean and the Precentor of
Hereford have of grain only, and all the herbage of the park, and
of crops which are sown or collected within the circuit of the
park ; the tythe of the rest remains to the said church, because
it is the land of his villeins.
We have decreed this gift in the first year of Stephen, King of
the English [1135].
No. 304.
Robert, Bishop of Hereford, to Symon, Bishop of Worcester.
Almost repeats No. 303.
No. 305.
The Convent of the Chapter of Hereford testify their assent
to the grant made by the bishop to the Prior and Canons of
Lanthony, of the two churches in Prestbury, saving the portions
of the tythe of the demesne.
1 This Bishop was Robert de Betun, (Bethune) consecrated in 1131. He
had previously been Prior of Lanthony. Died 1148. and was buried under an
arch and effigy in the south aisle of the choir. — En.
Vol. XIV. z.
350 Transactions for the Year 1889-90.
No. 306.
Charter of Robert, Bishop of Hereford,1 states that the said
Bishop has given to Lanthony Priory all the small tythes of his
demesne, in lambs, swine, wool and cheese, both in the vale and
on the hills, in his manor of Prestbury : —
Witnessed by Roger, Bishop of Worcester,2 Henry, Arch-
deacon of Exeter,3 and Alured, the Steward. Confirmed by the
Bishop's seal. [1164-79J.
No. 307.
Confirmation by Robert Melun, Bishop of Hereford, of all
possessions which the Priory of Lanthony had of the church of
Hereford : the two churches in Prestebury in the vale, and on
the hills, viz., the church of Sevenhampton with the lands and
tythes, excepting the portions of tythe of the Demesne.
No. 42.
W[alter de Cantilupe], Bishop of Worcester.
Has inspected an agreement made in connexion with a suit at
Gloucester, Michaelmas, a.d. 1263, between the Prior of Lan-
thony, and Sir John de Soincot (Sesincot) before Master W.
de Wien, his official at Worcester, concerning a certain pension
of forty shillings to be received from the church of " Sevenhamp-
tone " : the Prior and Convent appeared by their Proctor, the
brother William de St. German, and Sir John cle Soincot,
Rector of the church of Sevenhamtone, by his Proctor, Symon de
Schirburn, who confessed the liability of the Rector, and offered
to pay the arrears of the pension together with eight marcs.
" Given at Kemeseye in the year of Grace 1264."
1 This prelate was Robert de Muledon [Melun]. He succeeded Bishop
Bethune, and had also been Prior of Lanthony. Died 1167, and like his
predecessor was buried under an arch and effigy in the south aisle of the
choir. — Ed. (See Havergal's Hereford.)
2 Son of Robert the Consul, Earl of Gloucester. Elected 1163, cons. 13th
Aug., 1164, died 1179. (See Ante Vol. III., p. 38S.)
2 Son of Robert Fitz Harding, so named after Henry Fitz Empress
appd cir. 1148. He held also many other preferments in England. He was
also Dean of Moretain, and was elected Archb. of Dol, and died at Rome,
whither he had gone for consecration, in August, 1188. (See Lives of the
Berkeleys, Vol. I., pp. 54, 55. Maclean's Edition )— Ed.
Sevenhamptoit. 350
71.
The Official of the Diocese of Worcester to the [Rural] Dean
of Wynchcombe :
With reference to a suit concerning the chapel, &c, of Seven-
hampton, between the Prior and Convent of Lanthony, with the
Prior of Strigoil and others, Proctors ; and Master Ralph cle Pirie
who claimed to be the Rector of the said chapel ;
Declares that the said chapel has been, and is annexed to the
church of Prestbury, and ought to be dependent thereon, and in
full right thereto belonging : and that the said Religious Men
(the Prior and Canons) are to be put in corporeal possession of
the said Chapel as if annexed to, and dependent, on the church of
Prestbury. The Dean is accordingly required, without delay, to
induct, or cause to be inducted, the said Religious Men, or their
Proctor, into the corporeal possession of the said chapel accord-
ing to the Canon, and to defend their rights therein : ' Contradic-
tors et rebelles ' are to be restrained by the censure of the
church, i.e. by excommunication.
Given at Worcester on the Vigil of St. James, in the year of
Grace, 1275.
No. 69.
Richard,1 Bishop of Hereford, confirms to Lanthony Priory
the grant of the tythes in his demesne, in the parishes of Prest-
bury and Sevenhampton, cultivated by themselves, and of the
food of the animals there, as in the times of his predecessors.
Dated at Bosbury, 17 Kal. Nov. a.d. 1284.
Taxation op Pope Nicholas, a.d. 1291.
Archdeaconry/ of Gloucester.
The Bishop of Hereford has from Rents of Assize at Prest-
bury, £20 4 1 ; And Four carucates of land, each being worth
1 This prelate was Richard de Swinfield. He was consecrated at Glou-
cester, 12th March, 12S2-3, and died 15th March, 1316-17, and was buried in
the north transept of his cathedral, in a stone coffin, beneath a richly
moulded canopy, still bearing this inscription : "Hie: requiescit: Ricardus :
dictus : de : Swinefield Cantuariensis : diocesis : quondam : Episcopus :
Herefordensis.'' It is figured by Havergal, Plate II.— Eu.
z 2
352 Transactions for the Year 18S9-90.
40s., and one Watermill which is worth 20s ; from Pleas and
perquisites, 40s. ; from profits of Stock, 20s. Also at Pulgoumbe
Sevenhampton, £7 5 1^ of Rents, with three Carucates of
land, each worth 20s. : and one Water Mill which is worth 13s 4d:
and from Pleas and Perquisites of Court, 20s.
Sum £44 2 6£
Tenth £4 8 3
The Prior and Convent of Lanthony have at Prestbury and
Colecombe [in Sevenhampton] one carucate of land, and it is
worth 25s per annum : of Rents of Assize, 10s. Also from Stock,
10s. Sum £2 5 0
a.d. 1297. Protest of John, Dean of Hereford, against the
double taxation of his Tythes here :
" In the Name of the Lord. Amen. In the year of the same
1297, Indiction x. 4 Ka. April, in the presence of me the
appointed Notary Public and of the underwritten witnesses,
at the Old Temple in London, before Master Walter cle Win-
ton, Archdeacon of Huntingdon, Sir William de Stoketon and
John Maunsell, Clerks, of the venerable father the lord Oliver,
by the grace of God, Bishop of Lincoln, the lord John, Dean
of the church of Hereford sought remedy from the said father
and his Commissaries of certain errors concerning his possessions,
and those of the Chapter of the Church of Hereford — his petition
being in this form :
Before you, the reverend father, the lord Oliver, by the grace
of God, bishop of Lincoln, deputed by the Apostolic See to collect
the Tenth in England in aid of the Holy Land, Master Walter de
Winton, &c, John, dean of Hereford, seeks remedy, &c.
In primis, he says that the deanery is taxed in spiritualities
generally at £13 6 4 as is contained in the original Roll, and
that his portion of Tythes in the Manors of the Bishop of Hereford
in Prestbury and Sevenhampton, is a part of the spiritualities of
his deanery, which is taxed as a whole, as above. Concerning which,
an Inquisition was taken by order of the lord, the bishop of Lin-
coln, when it was found that this was twice taxed, and ought
not to be taxed in the separate particulars or portions. ******
Sevbnhamptox. 353
These things were done in the year, indiction, day, and place
noted above— in the presence of Master William de Loddelowe,
Robert de Mai ton, and Elyas de Croyndon, Clerks ; and Thomas
de Geyton, John de Dun, laics ; witnesses to the above premises.
And I, John, [son] of Robert of Clipston, Lincoln Diocese, by
the authority of the Holy Roman Church, Notary, was present,
and saw and heard these things, and by request have affixed my
mark, and my accustomed seal in testimony of these premises.
By means of the " Valor Ecclesiasticus " ' we arrive at the
increased values of these manors in 27th Hen. VIII. , i.e. after the
lapse of 250 years : —
In Prestbury.
Rent of Assize per aim. ...
Issues of the Manor with the Park
Farm of Demesne Lands ...
Farm of the Mill ....
Work of new rental there per annum
Rent discovered -----
Increased rent -
Perquisites of the Court (average)
Senh"mpt<m.
Rents of Assize per annum ...
Farm of the Demesne Lands
Issues of the Manor ....
Farm of the Demesne Lands in Puckcumbe
Farm of the Quarry ....
Farm of the Mill ....
Rents discovered ....
Perquisites of the Court there
Among Payments : —
Pension paid to the Rectors of the Church of Prestbury
(Lanthony Priory) for Tythes of Agistments and Pannage of the
Park, 4B.
* Vol. III., 3.
£39
17
10*
20
11
4
0
0
1
6
8
0
2
6
1
18
H
1
5
4
5
5
£74
6
5
£12
6
9
3
6
8
1
6
8
5
0
0
1
0
8
0
3
4
0
o
nil.
10
£23
6
11
354 Transactions for the Year 18S9-90.
Salary of Humfrey Elton, bailiff of Prestbury, 46s 8d.
,, the same, bailiff of Sefihampton, 1 3s 4d.
The Rectory of Prestbury with Glebe, tythes of wheat and hay
and other profits, was then let to farm to Robert Atwell,1 for £12
per annum.
William Elkyns, perpetual Vicar there, received from a parcel
of Glebe, Altarage, Oblations, and other issues, £9 13 4 per
annum.
The Proctors (Churchwardens) were possessed of three burgage
Tenements in Prestbury for the use of the Church, value 18s 3|d
per annum.
The value of the Rectory of Sevenhampton is not given in
this return, as it was then in the hands of the King, by reason of
the dissolution of the Priory of Lanthony, and as it would appear
that no Vicarage had been assigned, the whole revenues (except
the portions of the Dean and Precentor of Hereford) belonged to
the Priory.
The Parishioners were enfeoffed in one burgage tenement with
an adjoining close, and dovehouse, situate in Prestbury, in order
to keep the anniversary of John Combes (Camber) yearly, value
per annum, 6s 8d.
We have also 61s 8d per annum paid to Doctor Clifton, Dean
of Hereford, for certain portions of Tythes in Seueh'mpton and
Prestbury : a like sum was also received by the Precentor of
Hereford.
Subsidy Roll, 1 Edw. III. (1327).
s. d.
De Roberto de Solers - - - iij vi
,, Johne le Eyr - - - - — ix
,, Johne atte Welle ... iiij j
„ Henr. le Palmere - - - — xiiij ob.
,, Robto Copland - - ij vij
„ Galfrido Colynes - - - — xiij ob.
,, Thoma Bird - - - ij iiij
„ Rico Lyplofe - - - - — xviij ob.
Robto de Hales
X1J
1 Apparently Bailiff at Prestbury and Collector of Rents for the Priory.
Seven hamptox. 355
De Galfrido de Wytwelle -
Johfie Henryes
Nicho Fraunceys
Agnete atte Welle
Alice atte Shawe
Robto le Hattare
Rico Davy
Robto Bird
Willmo de Sevenbarupton
Joline Justice -
Henr. Reyner -
Johfie Reed
Sum
—
XX
—
xx ij
—
xxj ob.
—
XX
—
xj
—
viij ob.
—
vj ob.
—
vj ob.
—
xj ob.
—
vij ob.
—
vij ob.
ix
iiij
xl8
ijd
356 Transactions for the Ykar 18S9-90.
A PERAMBULATION OF THE FOREST OF DENE,
in the County of Gloucester, 10th Edw. I. (1281-2)
Contributed by SIR JOHN MACLEAN, F.S.A., F.R.S.A. (Ireland),
Vice-President of the Royal Archceological Institute of Great Britain <& Ireland,
and of this Society, Hon. Member of the Royal Institution of Cornwall, <Lx.
As long ago as 1878 the contributor of the following record
pointed out that "the early History of the Forest of Dene is an
obscure page of Gloucestershire history which deserves to be
cleared up,"1 and he forthwith commenced to collect materials, as
opportunities offered, with the intention of making an effort to
write a history of this ancient and interesting Royal Forest, which,
even then, though shorn of its glories in vert and venison, still
remained a Royal Forest. In making researches for this work he
found and transcribed the record referred to, as well as others,
but other labours in the elucidation of the local history and
genealogy of Gloucestershire have intervened and prevented him
from carrying out his contemplated work, until, alas ! it is too late
for him to attempt it ; and he is anxious to place this document
upon record in the Transactions of the Bristol & Gloucestershire
Archreological Society for the use of some younger man who may
be moved to take up and carry out a work which would be as
interesting in the preparation as valuable in the result. The
original of this document may be found inrolled on the Rolls of
the Forest of Dene preserved in the department of the Treasurer
of the Receipt of the Exchequer in the Public Record Office.
The present reference to the manuscript is " Chapter House
Records, Forest Rolls, Box 1, No. 7, Gloucester, 10th Edward I.
The area of the Forest in very early times was undoubtedly
much greater than it is at present, or even than that circumscribed
by this perambulation. As a Royal Forest, and yielding no profit,
1 Trans, of the Bristol & Glouc. Arch. Society, Vol. III., p. 367.
A Perambulation of the Forest of Dene. 357
it does not, of course, appear in the Domesday Survey, but accord-
ing to tradition, and as shewn by the map published by the late
Rev. H. G. Nicholls in his Forest of Dene, it extended from
Newent and Gloucester to Chepstow, embracing the whole of the
area between the Severn and the Wye below Gloucester. Many
portions of this district, however, long prior to the Conquest, had
been assarted, and appear in the Domesday Survey as manors,
but the Norman and Angevin Kings, who were passionately fond
of the chace, arbitrarily cast them back again into the forest.1 The
Manors of Hewelsfield and Wigheiete in this district were two
which William the Conqueror commanded should be included in
the Forest of Dene. But subsequently by various perambulations,
of which that under notice would appear to be the first for this
forest, the boundaries were again adjusted.
The forest as now denned consisted of ten bailiwicks, each
under its special bailiff who executed under the King direct such
powers as might be customary under the forest law, or specially
granted for this forest by the King. The bailiwicks were Abben-
hale, Blakeney, Bleyth (now called Bley), Bers (now Berse),
Staunton, Bikenoure (now Bicknor Anglicana), Rywardin (Ruar-
dean), Laca (now Lea Bailley), Dean Magna, and Dean Parva.
Before proceeding to the Bailiwicks it is shewn what lands, &c,
in each bailiwick were held, personally, by the King, and it is
stated that the Vill of Hunsam (Huntsham), which is situated on
the left bank of the river Wye, north of Symond's Yat, forming
a peninsula almost surrounded by the river, and in the county of
Hereford, is within the bounds of the forest, nevertheless, it is
added, the men of the said vill do not appear before the steward
nor verderei's at the Inquisitions, nor, moreover, before the Justice,
in Eyre.
The boundaries of the bailiwicks are severally defined, and
the document then goes on to give an account of the several mines
within the forest and by whom held.
The document is printed verbatim, though, for convenience
the Latin words have been extended.
1 Trans., Vol. IV., p. 126.
358 Transactions for the Year 1880-90.
REGARDUM FOREST.E DE DENE. 10th Euw. I. No. 7.
0 Domine libera aniniam meam a labljs iniquis et a lingua dolosa.
Regardum factum in foresta de Dene, die Mercurij in die Cinerum
(Ash Wednesday), anno Regni Regis Edwardi Decimo, per
Dominum Willelmum de Derneford, Willelmum Mauncel, Nichol-
auni de Gam ages, Johannem de la Mare, Mauricium de Salsa-
marisca, Milites, Milonum de Longetot, Willelmum de Burk,
Petrum de Tinthescumbe, Robertum de Draycote, Walterum
Hackett, Robertum de Piritune et Robertum de Coveleye,
Regardatores Jurati. Qui dicunt per sacramentum quod Willelmus
de Stuttebrugge tenet in Chirchome unam acram &c.
LANDE.
Dominus Rex habet Landeas1 subscriptas in foresta de Dene
videlicet inter balliuam de Blakeney et Balliuam de Stauntene
Landeam de Moseleye. Item inter easdem balliuas landeam de
Seinteleye. Item in balliua de Magna Dene landeam de Konhop.
Item in balliua de Stanten, landeas de Wychtmed et de Wyteleye.
Item inter balliuas de Magna Dene et Habehale, landeam de Okie-
fold. Item in balliua de Abehale landeam de Kenesleye. Item
landeam de Crumpemede in eadem balliua. Item in eadem balliua
landeam de Walemore. Walterus de Snappe includit hayam sup-
radictam landeam de Wychtmed, nescitur quo warranto. In sup-
radicta landea de Walemor in balliua de Abenhale Radulphus de
Abenhalle habet ibi vnum pratum infra landeam, nescitur quo
warranto, et continet 6 acras. Walterus de Helme habet ibi vnum
pratum, nescitur quo warranto. Abbas de Flexleye habet quoddam
pratum vocatum New more et continet 6 acras. Idem Abbas
elargiuit fossatum suum ad quantitatem dimidise acra? terras infra
predictam landeam. Item omnes terra? et omnia prata qua? pre-
dictus abbas habet in predicta landea sunt purprisa? In eadem
landea sunt plures purprestura? qua? non possunt inquiri nee
videri propter cretinam aqua?.
Dicunt Jurati quod Radulphus de Abenhale impercauit in ipsa
landea bestias hominum patria? et sumpsit ab eis 55 ancas2 et eas
retinuit ad opus suum proprium et attachiamenta debent esse
domino Regi.
1 Landea, or Landia, marshy or sedgy lands surrounded by a ditch or .
foss to carry off the water. From (erre = land and eie = water. — See Ducange,
also Jacobs' ', Law Dictionary. 2 ? From Ancercs = geese.
A Perambulation of the Forest of Dene. 359
Mete eiusdem pasture incipiunt apucl le Hulke subter Chaxhull et
durat per fossatum vsque le huntemede et sic per Clarkefeld vsque
ad viam quse ducit apud addecete et sic de ilia via per fossatum
vsque ad pratum monachorum quod vocatur Brodemede, et sic
per fossatum et per la Longmede in la Westmede et sic de la West-
mede per fossatum usque Suymede et sic per fossatum subter
pyehurste vsque ad pratum domini Regis quod vocatur la Hay et
sic per fossatum vsque ad parcum qui vocatur Yisses Croft et sic
subter Montem de Walemore vsque Ruggeleys Walle et sic per
fossatum vsque la holke.
Villata de honsum (Huntsham) est infra metas forestae subtracta
est de foresta, et homines eiusdem villatse non comparent coram
Senescallo nee viredariis ad Inquisitiones faciendas nee etiam
comparuerunt coram Justiciariis in suo Itinere.
BALLIUA DE ABBENHALE.
Balliua de Abbenhalle custodita est per Radulphuni cle Abbenhale
et incipit apud Dychesende supra hopesherde in longitudine inter
Sheperugge et Abbenhale hulle vsque Vuerhunteneforde et sic vsque
Vastbaches unde semper per rivulum aquaB et sic vsque Atteleye-
grene inter ballivam cle parva Dene et la munede1 de atteleyegrenp
summum iter usque Sinclerford et sic juxta aquam vsque le Mer-
broc inter balliuam de Blaken et dictam balliuam de Abbenhale
et sic de Merbroke vsque caput de Visokenemers prout stren-
chatur quse vocatur Pyrhales et sic vsque viseches prout summum
iter ducit et sic summum iter per mediam spinatam de Seyntleye
vsque meroke extransverso le Blaksennie weye vsque ad caput del
Mersiche et sic in longitudine vsque Nevverne et sic dividit
rivulus de Newerne dictam balliuam et balliuam de Dene vsque
Mulebache et sic de Mulebache prout dividitur per aquam vsque
Mareforde et sic per altam viam quse ducit uersus Ruwardyne de
Aletangge et sic in longitudine vsque Briddessete et mariscum
vsque ad iter quod jacet juxta leymores welle et vocatur Bikenores-
wey et sic vsque la pulle et iuxta aquam usque Shetersforde et
1 Fence or hedge. Given in Bailey's Eng. Dictionary, and in Halliwell,
as " munite" rendered fenced or fortified, from the Latin " munitus," • t'
and ' d ' being convertible in all languages.
360 Transactions for the Year 18S9-90.
sic Spannewey usque la munede, de illo loco usque Hobasrudingge
et sic sicut fossa ducit usque blakewell broke et sic iuxta aquam
usque veteretn crucem et per cursum aqua? vsque Sheperugges
rode et sic per fossani vsque Wylecockes Rudingge et sic iuxta
cuedenesmore iuxta campum vsque pleystede et sic per fossam
in longitudine vsque la Rudingge Ade le Palmere et sic per fossam
vsque terrain Ade Sireman de Hope et iuxta boscum de hope
vsque dichesende supra hopesherde.
Balliua de Abbenhale in Chastenarijs incipit apud Merstowe
et sic suramum iter usque veterem raolendinum et iter vsque
blakemores halle et sic iter vsque monekene ruddingge et sic per
fossatum vsque boscum monachorum et sic per la bache vsque
folegate et sic iter vsque la morstowe et omnes bosci ipsius
balliuje sunt de dominico Regis.
Et facta est quaedam trenchea1 de Spannewey extendens in
longitudine de Scetaresforde vsque la munede et continet quinque
acras inter Eywode et Harewode.
Item vna trenchea vocata Olderende extendens se in longi-
tudine de la Oldtune vsque la munede et continet vj acras in
bosco de Eywod.
Item vna trenchea vocata Newerende extendens se in longi-
tudine de Oldefolde vsque la munede et continet iiij acras in
bosco de Eywod.
Item vna trenchea incipiens apud Prestes rudinge extendens se
in longitudine vsque bronstonesbroke et continet ix acras in bosco
de Oures.
Item vna trenchea vocata Vastlachesreude extendens se in
longitudine de novo molendino vsque la munede et continet xij
acras et dimidiam in bosco Oures.
Item vna trenchea incipiens apud Sinderford extendens se in
longitudine vsque Piriheye et continet x acras in bosco de Barn-
demore.
Item vna trenchea vocata Newarnereude extendens in longi-
tudine de Wyteleye vsque Mulebeche continet xj acras et dimi-
diam in Costera boscorum de Gardino et Wydenheye.
Item vna trenchea iuxta la pulle et continet x acras iuxta
landeam de Oldfolde.
1 Trenchea or Trancheia, would seem to have much the same signification
as Landea. — See note 1 , p. 35S,
A Perambulation of the Forest of De.ve. 361
Item duoe ti'enchea? in chastaniis, vna extendens se in longi-
tudine castrum et alia in latitucline de quibus longior continet vj
acras et alia vj acras.
BALIUA DE BLAKENEY.
Balliua de Blakeney est dominicus boscus domini Regis et
Walterus de Astune custodit earn. Et incipiunt metse eiusdem
balliuse a ia blakepulleforde per vicum vocatum Fineethway vsque
Fineeth et sic per altum vicum vsque semitam vocatam Mersty et
sic per semitam illam vsque Merbrok et sic per Merbrok vsque
la pulle inter paruam Stapuleg et magnam Stapuleg, et sic per la
pulle quae diuidit balliuam de blakeneje et boscum monachorum
de fflexleye et boscum de Rudele vsque la depeforde, et sic apud
Erleyeforde et sic per hayam bosci vsque molendinum de Blake-
neye et sic per costeram bosci vsque la Ritthwaye et sic per
costeram bosci vsque lonnesbrok et sic per quendam vallem vsque
ad vicum vocatum Parseteway et per vicum ilium vsque blake-
mere et sic per Russell um vsque Achebrok et sic per Achebrok
vsque Smalebrok et per Smalebrok vsque Solewalle et sic per
medium prati de Akely vsque vicum vocatum brodokewey et sic
per vicum ilium vsque ad caput de Moseleye et sic per Russell
descenduntur per medium Moseleye in la blakepulle et sic as-
sendendo la pulle vsque vadum de Seynteleye et sic vsque
blakepulleforde.
Et facta est vna trenchea vocata la Colstyerende incipiens apud
Merbroke et durans ad Castrum de Moseleye et continet lx acras
et fuit boscus spissus de minutis corulis.
Item vna trenchea vocata de holebache incipiens apud Seytte-
XX
ehreneforde et durans vsque Waldinges worpin et continet viij
acras.
Item vna trenchea vocata de la Bromespulle incipiens apud
XX
Merebrok et durans a la Depeforde et continet vj acras.
Item vna trenchea vocata de la hayermede incipiens a la hole-
waye et durans vsque Ankeleyeford et continet c acras.
Item vna trenchea vocata blakepullerende incipiens apud a la
XX
petiteforde et durans vsque la Seyrrugeforde et continet vj acras.
362 Transactions foe the Year 1S89-90.
Item viia trenchea vocata Austyerende incipiens apud Roynus-
XX
cheyne et durans vsque Holeweysende et continet ix acras.
Item vna trenchea de Sondbedderende incipiens apud Richt-
waye et durans ad caput de Moseleye et continet cc et xl acras.
Item vna trenchea vocata Crofterende incipiens apud le
Blakepulle supra Moseleye et durat vsque Westbrok, et continet
C acras.
Item vna trenchea vocata de Stapelegge incipiens ad fontem
de Merebrok et durans vsque caput de Holebache et continet L
acras.
BALLIUA DE BLEYTH.
Est dominicus boscus domini Regis et Radulphus Hopewy
custodit earn. Et incipit apud la Cocksutgrene et inde per viam
Regiam vsque ad crucem ante portam curiae Willelmi Bleyth et
inde per quandam sernitam ducentem iuxta dictam portam et
curiam quae ducit iuxta terram quce vocatur le Morfurlonge, quam
terram dictus Willelmus tenet de domino Rege, vsque ad terram
Johannis de la Boxe, et inde per terram illam vsque ad torrentem
quae vocatur Merinerudinge broke, et inde per illam torrentem
vsque ad Ynichebeche et inde per fossatum iuxta terram Abbatis
Sancti Petri Gloucestri?e vsque ad viam qua? vocatur Tabbinge-
weye et inde per fossatum dicti Abbatis vsque ad Depemore et
inde per fossatum eiusdem vsque ad le Heyewaye et inde per
illam viam vsque Rugwaye et inde per viam illam vsque Scipweye
et inde per viam illam ducentem vsque Swefforde in la pulle et
inde per pullam illam vsque ad trencheram illam quaa est inter
bleytheswyke et boscum de fflexleye, qui quondam fuit de pre-
dicta balliua, et inde per trencheram illam ascendendo vsque ad
Rugweye et inde per viam de Rugwaye vsque ad assartum
Radulphi de Rodleye et inde descendendo per fossatum iuxta
assarta vsque ad prrenorninatum locum qui vocatur la Cocksute-
grene.
BALLIUA DE BERS.
Est dominicus boscus domini Regis et Willelmus Wodewardus
custodit earn. Et incipit apud Kunesbrok et extendit ex ilia parte
ad boscum de Alwintune et Aylbertune vsque Payebwallebroke et
de ilia broka vsque la horewall et de la harewulle vsque Cokwodes-
broke et de ilia broke vsque Sponnegrene et de Sponnegrene
A Perambulation of the Forest of Dexe. 363
vsque Pustanesbroke ad Crucem et de illo loco vsque ad campum
de Nova terra vsque la Stowe et de la Stowe per campum Sancti
Breuelli vsque redinor et per Redmor vsque cunnesbroke et in
eadem balliua est le defens.
Et facta est ibi vna trenchea vocata bremerende incipiens
apud la holyene munede et durat apud brodokethurne et continet
vnam acram et dimidiam.
Item vna trenchea vocata Aspenemerruede incipiens apud
Aspennemere et durat vsque la holiene munede et continet iiij
acras et dimidiam.
Item vna trenchea vocata Aspunerede incipiens apud la
Horewalle et durat vsque ad finem et herede et continet x acras.
Item vna trenchea vocata fineecherede incipiens apud Longer-
rende et durat vsque ad Okwodebrok et continet ij acras.
Item vna trenchea vocata longereode incipiens apud Wynetes-
buri et durat vsque trellemede et continet ij acras.
Item vna trenchea vocata Cleyesladesreode incipiens apud la
Wytereode et durat vsque la horewalles siche et continet iiij
acras.
Item vna trenchea vocata Sponnerede incipiens apud Sponne-
grene et durat vsque la bersesenese.
Item vna trenchea vocata la Wyterende incipiens apud Cley-
weysencle et durat vsque trellemedesenese et continet x acras.
Boscus cle Hodenhales est dominicus boscus domini Regis et
distructus est per homines de Sancto Breuello et ipsi homines
clamant libertatem capiendi inde pro voluntate et semper inde ita
ceperunt.
BALLIUA DE STAUNTEN.
Est dominicus boscus domini Regis et Richardus de la More
custodiuit earn, et nunc est in manu Regis. Et incipit apud la
Wlfinyenok et extendit vsque Wyteleye per le Mersty et de la
Wyteleye vsque la Meroky et de la Meroky per le Machuneswalle
et per la Blakepulle vsque castrum de Moseley et de castro de
Moseley vsque ad Waldingesworthine per illani viam et de
Waldingesworthin vsque Crumpemedewe et de Crumpemedwe
vsque ad le Sned. Et de le Sned vsque ad Rivulum de JSTewerne et
sic per Newerne usque ad rivulum qui vocatur Druybrok et per
364 Transactions for the Year 18S9-90.
Druybroke vsque le bechenehulle et de le bechenehulle per
Marlewaye weye vsque Payhvallebrok et de Paylwallebroke vsque
ad le Breme et de le Brerae vsque horewalle et de horawalle
vsque Okwoclebroke vsque la Sponnegrene et de la Sponnegrene
vsque Cradokestone et de Cradokestone per Bikenoresti vsque
ad Wolfinyenok.
Et facta est ibi vna trenchea vocata la Bechenehulle incipiens
ad caput de holines et durat ad viam qua? tendit ad Chalfring et
continet xij acras et dimidiarn.
Item vna trenchea iuxta Newarne ex vtraque parte incipiens
apud Ohapmone brugge et durat vsque Wyteleye et continet
XX
viij acras.
Item vna trenchea vocata Newarnerede incipens apud Chap-
mone brugge et durat vsque Coleforde et continet lx acras.
Item vna trenchea incipiens apud Merebrok iuxta Newarne
et durat vsque Coleford et continet xx acras.
Item vna trenchea incipiens apud pileswalle et durat vsque ad
viam que tendit ad Waldingesworthine et continet xxx acras.
Item vna trenchea incipiens apud Crokedeford et durat vsque
holiene munede et continet x acras.
Item vna trenchea incipiens apud Secoleputtes et durat vsque
Wartokesey iuxta Newernehey et continet xxx acras.
Item vua trenchea incipiens apud Pileswalle et durat vsque
frogcrewall et continet xxx acras.
BALLIUA DE BIKENOURE.
Est dominicus boscus domini Begis et Cecilia de Michegros
custodit earn Et predicta balliua incipit apud Bissopeswere in
Riparia de Waye et sic per quendam vicum vsque ad altum
vicum qui ducit de Bikenore vsque Stantune et sic per quamdam
semitam vsque Wybaltunesbroke et sic per campos de Stauntune
vsque ad Greneweye et sic per campos de la Newelonde vsque
Thustanes broke et ascendendo per Thustanes brok vsque ad
vivarium domini Regis et de viuario domini Regis per altum vicum
vsque Wlfinyenok et sic per quamdam semitam vsque Kinges-
perche et sic per semitam quae tendit per medium de Wimberleye
vsque Kingesok et sic per quamdam semitam vsque Kaderichesok
Ox the Perambulation of the Forest of Dexe. 365
et sic per quamdam semitam ducentem ultra montem de fflite-
newyke ad Lodebrok et sic per campos de Bikenore iuxta
Hangerby vsque ad vicum vocatum hestbacheswey et sic per
eosdem campos vsque ad alterum vicum qui tendit versus Mone-
mouth et sic per quamdam semitam vsque Martines Coksute et
sic iuxta eosdem campos per Symundeszate vsque Way am ad
locum vocatum Seotelinde et sic ex transverso montis vsque ad
longam petram et sic per ripam de Waye vsque bissopeswere.
Facta est vna trenchea vocata bissopesslade incipiens ab alto
vico de Bikenouere ad Stantune et durat ad Wayam et continet
XX
iiij x acras.
Item vna trenchea vocata de Maylescoyt incipiens apud Hoden
akesputte et durat per wayam vsque Symondesgate et continet ij
acras et dimidium.
Item vua trenchea vocata Aluinebache incipiens ab alto vico
qui ducit versus Staunten durans vsque wayam ct continet vij
aci-as et dimidium.
Item vna trenchea vocata Croysedereode incipiens ab alunde-
bache durans vsque bissopeslade et continet ij acras.
Item vna trenchea vocata Lodebrokesreode incipiens apud
holebrok et durans vsque campos iuxta hangerbi et continet iiij
acras.
BALLIUA DE RYWARDIN.
Est dominicus boscus domini Eegis et est in manu domini Regis
et constabularies Sancti Breuelli custodit earn ; et incipiunt mete
eiusdem balliue apud Wlfmyenok et sic per le Mersty dividens
balliuas de Bikenoure et Rywardin vsque ad perticham domini
Regis et sic per idem Mersty vsque Chasegreysok et sic idem
Mersty vsque Ludebrok et sic per Ludebrok, vsque wayam, et sic
assendendo per wayam vsque Smalbroke et sic per Morwode-enese
vsque Cnappestysenese et sic inter boscum et campos vsque le
Smitheswey et adhuc inter boscum et campos vsque hanewaye et
adhuc inter boscum et campos vsque Vokshalegrene et adhuc inter
boscum et campos usque Barndleysende, et adhuc inter boscum
et campos vsque Berleysgrene et sic per le Mersty inter balliuam
de Rywardin et boscum Abbatis Gloucestrire vsque Druybrokes-
walle et sic per Druyebrok vsque Schuetereforde et sic per altum
Vol. XIV. 2 a
366 Transactions for the Year 18S9-90.
vicum tendens apud Bikenoure vsque Keyerikesok et sic per 1©
Mersty diuidens balliuam de Rywardin eb balliuam de Dene
vsque duas pulcras quercus et sic per altam viam tendens apud
Monmouth vsque la Wlfmyenok.
Una trenchea incipiens ad crucem avenelli et durans vsque
XX
Scuteresforde et continet iiij acras.
Item vna trenchea incipens apud Kederekesok durans vsque
Knappestyesenese et continet xx acras.
Item vna trenchea incipiens apud brodok extendens vsque
brodweyesenese et continet xij acras.
Item vna trenchea incipiens apud Knappestyesforde durans
vsque Warmwalle et continet xij acras.
BALLIUA DE LACU.
Est dominicus boscus domini Regis et Nicholaus de Lacu custodit
earn. Metse eiusdem balliuse incipiunt apud Aletune et sic per
Aletunes brok usque ad crucem de Netherewestune et sic per
altuni vicum vsque ad arborem vocatam bolletre et sic per altum
vicum vsque fraxinum vocatam bromesasse et sic per altum vicum
vsque ad crucem vocatam Luce crosse et sic per quamdam semitam
vsque ad crucem vocatam Holwardines Croyce et sic per altum
vicum vsque birchoure et sic per altum vicum vsque Marlwalle
et sic per quamdam trencheam que diuidit balliuam de Dene et
balliuam de Lacu vsque Wynterwallethornes et sic ultra le
muneden vsque ad album lapidem et sic per quamdam semitam
vocatam Mersty qute diuidit boscum Abbatis Gloucestrise et balliuam
de Lacu vsque ad Pirihale et sic pir altum vicum vsque Pirihale-
thorne et sic per quamdam sycheter vocatam Derkesforde vsque
halewalle et sic per altum vicum vsque crucem de Koctere et sic
per altum vicum vsque aletune.
Facta est vna trenchea vocata de Sleperesthorne incipiens ad
boscum Abbatis Gloucestrise et durans vsque Wyggepol et con-
tinet vj acras.
Item vna trenchea vocata de Pirihale incipiens apud le Mersty
inter balliuam de Lacu et boscum abbatis Glouc. et durat usque
la munedwey et continet vj acras vnam rodam et dimidium.
Rogerus Spure de Sancto Breuello Walterus Pagum de Bikenore
Stephanus Edy de Lideneye sunt malefactores de viridi.
Ox the Perambulation of the Fokest of Dene. 367
BALLIUA DE MAGNA DENE.
Est dominicus boscus domini Regis et est in manu domini Regis
et constabularius Sancti Breuelli custodit earn. Et incipiunt
metse eiusdem balliuae apud le Mersty super Nfewarne et extendit
se per ilium, Mersty diuidendo ipsam balliuam et balliuam de Staun-
tune vsque Wlfmyenok et sic vsque duas pulcras quercus per
publicum vicum et sic per le Mersty qui diuidit ipsam balliuam et
balliuam de Rywardin per medium de la longereode iuxta crucem
Awnelli et sic per altum vicum vsque Schutaresford et sic per
druybrok vsque paruam haseleye et sic per le Mersty qui diuidit
ipsam balliuam et balliuam de Lacu vsque Wiggepol et sic per
trencheaui vocatam Newereode vsque Marlewalle et sic per
costeram bosci vsque Coksuteweye et sic per costeram bosci ad
locum vocatum Randy et ad hue per costeram bosci vsque Calde-
walle et sic vltra la munede usque ad caput de Sp^nneway et sic
per altam viam vsque Scataresforde et sic per la pulle vsque Bike-
nouresforde et sic per le Mersty qui diuidit ipsam balliuam et
balliuam de Abenhale vsque ad altum vicum iuxta Leyemoreswalle
et sic per mariscum inter Wydenheye et Seyrrugge vsque Mare-
forde et sic per quemdam Sychetter vsque ad Mulebeche et sic per
Newerne vsque le Mersty super Newerne.
Facta est ibi vna trenchea incipiens de hopestiesford usque
Stauntunesforde et continet L acras.
Item vna trenchea vocata la Merruede incipiens apud la
munede et durat vsque Marlebrugge et continet dimidiam acram.
Item vna trenchea incipiens de Druybrokesforde et durans
vsque Schepesty et continet unam acram et dimidium.
Item vna trenchea incipiens apud Kockschutesfelde durans
vsque la munede et continet ij acras.
BALLIUA DE PARUA DENE.
Est dominicus boscus domini Regis et Radulphus de Abenhale
custodit earn, et est in manu domini Regis, et incipit apud
la Monekenedich et sic per quemdam Sichetum de Bronstonesbrok
vsque vastbeche et sic per la munede vsque pukeputteswey et
sic per fossatum iuxta la Ridinge vsque coryeldestone et sic per
idem fossatum usque Northlepegate et sic per idem fossatum
vsque la Merstowe et sic usque la Monekenediche.
2a 2
36S Transactions fur the Year 1SS9-90.
In eadetn balliua inveniuntur cippi iiii querciuum succisarurn
et asportarum propter electionem justitiaria^um apud Glocestriam ;
et sub-boscus est bene custoclitus. Summa quercuum iiii.
Facta est ibi vna trenchea incipiens apud Bronstonesbroke et
durans vsque holemerstowe et continet vnam acrara et xxv fossata
carboiiis. Summa fossata? carbonis xxv. Jurati dicunt quod in
omnibus balliuis predictis fuerunt plures cippi quam sint com-
putati et nullo modo computari potuerunt quia aboliti sunt per
Vetera fossata carbonariorum que Constabularius de Sancto
Breuello tenuit super cippis predictis et etiam fforestarij de feodo
quilibet in balliua sua tenuit similiter Vetera fossata videlicet
quoniam rex habet vetus fossatum quilibet flbrestarius habet
unuin ffossatum in balliua sua preter in balliua Radulphi Hathewy
scilicet balliua de Bleyth.
DE MINERIIS.
Dicunt quod Radulphus de Abenhale1 habet mineriam in balliua
de Abbenhale, et Dominus Rex nichil inde habet nisi sex
summas minerie per septimanam et clat propter hoc operatoribus
vj clenarios.
Cecilia de Michegros2 habet mineriam in balliva de Bikenore
si inventa fuerit.
Walterus de Astune clamat mineriam in balliva de Blakeneye
si inventa fuerit.
Dominus Rex habet Mineriam in balliva de Ma^na Dene et
capit de quolibet operatori qui peterit lucrari per septimanam
tres summas minerie j denarium per septimanam, et quando
mineria primo invenietur, dominus rex habebit unum hominem
operantem cum aliis operantibus in mineria et conducet ilium pro
duobus denariis per diem et habebit partem lucri quantum eveniat
uni operatori.
Item Dominus Rex habebit mineriam per septimanam sex
summas minerie que vocantur lawore et dabit propter hoc
operanti vj clenarios per septimanam.
1 See Pedigree, ante Vol. VI., p. 1S3.
2 Cecilia de Michegros was the daughter and heir of John Avenel, of
Bicknor, ob. ) 286, and wife of John de Muchegros, ob. 1276. Her husband had
been dead about six years at the date of this Perambulation. She survived
to 1301. — (See Pedigree, ante Vol. IV, p. 31S.)
On the Perambulation of the Forest of Dene. 309
Dorninus Rex habet in balliva cle Bers quia plures sunt
ibidem minerie quam in balliva de dene omnia sicuti in balliva
de dene hoc excepto, quod habet hide per septimanam xxiiij
summas minerie quae vocantur Laweore et dat propter hoc
operatoribus per septimanam ij solidos. Dominus Rex habet in
balliva de Stauntune mineriam et capit incle omnia sicuti in
balliva de Magna Dene hoc excepto, quod dominus rex habebit
de quolibet operatori qui poterit lucrari per septimanam tres
summas minerie unum obolum per septimanam et non amplius.
Item si dominus Rex habeat vnam forgeam errantem predicti
operarii invenient ei mineam ad sustentacionem predicts forgese
et dominus rex dabit eis pro qualibet summa j denarium.
Item Dominus rex habebit de qualibet summa minerie quae
ducetur extra forestam vnum obolum et Omnia quae dominus rex
capit de mineria ponitur ad firmam per xlvj li.
Item in balliva de Lacu est minea et Dominus Ricardus
Talebatt1 habet earn et nescitur quo warranto, et dominus rex
nihil inde capit.
Item Comes Warwychye habet mineriam in bosco suo de
Lideneye et dominus rex nichil inde capit, nisi de mineria quae
cariatur extra forestam obolum.
Jurati dicunt quod fforestarii capiunt coperones lignorum
liberatorum mineariis ad bonduram minearum et faciunt inde
comodum suum.
' Sir Richard Talbot, of Goodrich Castle ?
3n (nUntoriam*
WILLIAM HENRY PAINE, F.R.C.R, F.G.S.
Since the issue of the last Part of our Transactions the Society has lost
another of its Original Members in the decease of Dr. Paine, of Stroud,
after an illness of considerable duration. He was a native of Stroud, and
was born on the 28th April, 1824, and died the 15th June, 1890, aged 66
years.
Dr. Paine was much respected in the town for his great professional
skill, his liberality, his unobtrusive and always courteous demeanour, and
his devotion to all good works. He was greatly instrumental in the erection
of the Hospital in the town, and took the greatest interest in its
management afterwards, visiting it daily. He was very active in the
establishment of the Cemetery, was the first Chairman of the Board of
Health, was strenuous in the effort to form a Mechanics' Institute, and sub-
sequently of the Stroud Institute ; he encouraged young men in the study of
Art and Science, and himself formed and conducted a class in Physiology.
He was a great promoter of the foundation of the School of Art and of
the Stroud Natural History and Philosophical Society, and in advancing
other philanthrophical objects. He was in the Commission of the Peace
for the County of Gloucester, and was a member of the Royal Geological
Society, the Cotteswold Naturalists' Field Club from its foundation, and of
the Bristol and Gloucester Archaeological Society, on the Council of which
he served for some years. He frequently attended the meetings of the
Society, but he has not enriched the Transactions with any communication.
Notices of Recent Arch.eological Publications, 371
£Lotms of ilemtt JUchftotogical & historical publications.
CALENDAR OF STATE PAPERS (Domestic Sekies) of the Reign of
Charles I., 1644-1645, preserved in Her Majesty's Public Record Office.
Edited by William Douglas Hamilton, F.S.A., of Her Majesty's Public
Record Office and the University of London. London : Printed for the
Public Record Office, 1890.
This is one of the most interesting of the volumes of the Domestic Series
of the State Papers which have been issued, for it embraces the most critical
period of the great Civil War, when the fate of the country was, as it were,
hanging in the balance. The last of Mr. Hamilton's volumes brought down
the history of thi3 important period to the end of Sept. 1644, covering the
three campaigns of that eventful year. That volume was noticed in Vol. XIII.
of our Transactions. The volume now before us includes a further period of
9 months, extending from 1st October, 1644, to 30th June, 1645.
The greater number of the Papers calendared in this volume relate to the
military affairs of the Parliamentary party, as we should expect to find from
the fact that they were derived almost entirely from Derby House. The
earlier documents exhibit the miserable condition of the Parliamentary army,
and the privations the soldiers endured led to desertions and insubordination,
in some cases amounting almost to open revolt ; nevertheless the men fought
well when brought into the field. Very great evils, however, arose from the
jealousies and ill-feeling which existed between the less important officers,
but these were mere trifles as compared witli the great quarrel that took
place between the Earl of Manchester and Cromwell, which, in effect, led to
changes in the personel of the army, the total overthrow of the Constitution,
and the death of the King. Before, however, we notice this part of the
subject we must not fail to advert to the fact that the first measure taken on
the opening of the new year was the attainder and subsequent execution of
the venerable Archbishop of Canterbury. The two Hothams, and Sir Alex-
ander Carew, had already been brought to the block.
On the 4th January, 1644-5, the Ordinance of Attainder of the Archbishop
was brought into the Commons and hurried through both houses on the same
day. He was charged with various offences, which were enumerated in the
Ordinance, and it was declared that "the said Archbishop shall stand and
be adjudged attainted of high treason, and shall suffer the pains of death and
incur all forfeitures," &c. , though there was not one of the allegations which
would legally fall under the law of treason, and so conscious were his per-
secutors of this that provision was made in the Ordinance that no judge or
judges, whatsoever, should interpret any act to be treason in any other
manner than they would have done before this Ordinance was made.
Nevertheless, under this arbitrary and illegal proceeding, the aged Arch-
bishop, without regard to his sacred office, was put to death on Tower Hill
six days afterwards.
372 Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications.
We now turn to the great quarrel between the Earl of Manchester and
Oliver Cromwell. We all know that after the overthrow of the Church the
Parliamentary party became divided into two sections, each bitterly hostile
to the other. The object of the Presbyterians, to which section the Earl
of Manchester belonged, was to conquer the King so far only as to constrain
him to accept the Presbyterian regime and other changes in religion arising
therefrom. The Independents, on the other hand, including all the numer-
ous and violent sectaries — Broumists, Anabaptists, Antinonimns, Seekers,
Socinians, &c, &c. , which naturally arose when all religious restraint was
removed, went much further than pure democracy. They felt that even if
the King could be forced to yield to all their demands, he would still be
King, and they feared to face all the pains and penalties to which their
consciences told them their conduct had rendered them liable, and they there-
fore determined upon his destruction. Of this party Cromwell was the leader.
Moreover, another important matter was at stake. For many centuries
the nobles and great landed gentry of the kingdom, who were the natural
leaders of the people, had been the chief officers of the army, and had led
the army to victory on many a gallant field.
This system, however, neither in principle nor practice, suited Cromwell's
designs. It was an obstacle in his way which he determined to remove, and
what he determined upon his strong, imperious, and unscrupulous will gener-
ally enabled him to accomplish. To attain his object he thwarted, as far
as he could, the tactics of the Earl of Manchester, under whom he served as
second in command, and represented the failure of every enterprise as the
fault of his general, whose object, he said, was not to crush the King too
completely in the field but to constrain him to make some compromise.
Cromwell's charges against the Earl may be resolved into :
1st. His backwardness to all action, his neglecting opportunities, and
declining to take or pursue advantages against the enemy.
2nd. Which was still more galling : that he had expressed much con-
tempt and scorn of commands from the parliament, or the committee of both
kingdoms (Cal., p. 143).
There may be some truth in these averments. Manchester may have had
these patriotic feelings, but it is manifest from the documents collected by
the late Mr. John Bruce, and printed by the Camden Society (Misc. Vol. XII.
N.S.), that on many occasions Cromwell intentionally had witheld that sup-
port in action required from the cavalry under his command. Moreover, it is
alleged that he conspired to get rid of all the high mini led officers under his
command whom he could not bend to his will, and to fill the vacancies by
men of low birth and of his own sect, of whose subserviency to himself he
felt assured. One of the witnesses declares that Colonel Cromwell in raising
the regiment "makes choyce of his officers, not [from] such as were soldiers or
men of estate but such as were common men, pore and of mean parentage, only
he would give them the title of godly pretious men ; yet his common practise
was to casheire honest gentlemen and souldiers that were stout in the cause,
as I conceive, witnes those that did suffer in that case." (Camden Pub., p. 72)
The charges brought by Cromwell against the Earl of Manchester,
the nature of which we have briefly stated above, are somewhat lengthy,
but they have been very carefully calendared by Mr. Hamilton, as well
Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications. 373
as the evidence in support thereof, which has not hitherto been printed.
There are, however, no documents in the Derby House collection to shew
Manchester's defence, and it was thought that no such evidence existed.
Fortunately this is a mistake. Some documents are printed in Rushworth's
collection (Vol. V., pp. 734-736), and a further portion in the collection
made by the late Mr. John Bruce, before referred to, in the Camden Mis-
cellany, Vol. VIII., N.S., by Mr. S. R. Gardiner, LL.D.
These proceedings caused very strong contentions between the friends of
the respective parties. Mr. Hamilton, in the Preface to this volume, has
entered very fully into the controversy, but we have neither space nor
inclination to join in it, and do not share in all Mr. Hamilton's views upon
the question, which was never cleared up, but was dropped on the passing of
the Self Denying Ordinance, under which all members of either house of
parliament were required to resign their commissions in the army. Under
this Ordinance the Earls of Essex, Manchester, Stamford, and other lords
and many gentlemen became disqualified and retired. Sir Thomas Fairfax
became commander in chief, and Cromwell, as Lieut. -General commanding
the Horse, the second in command. Thus the first step of the Republican
programme was gained. Cromwell, as a member of parliament, should have
been included in the Ordinance, and so he was, but he knew how to play
his cards so as to escape it. Fairfax and Cromwell now had a free hand.
Not only were the " aristocrat*" excluded from the " New Model," but all
their friends, and all who had rendered themselves in any way inimical
to the Independent faction.
The process of " New Modelling " was professedly carried out by Sir
Thomas Fairfax under the direction of the Committee for the two kingdoms,
but the moving spirit was Cromwell. When the "New Modelling" was
completed neither the commander in chief, nor Cromwell, nor the Committee
would seem to have had much confidence in the New Army. Orders were
given that the forces under Fairfax and Cromwell should unite with those
under Major-General Richard Browne and prepare to besiege Oxford, and
that the more hazardous task of resisting the King's army, which, under
Prince Rupert, was marching northwards, should be entrusted to the Scots
under the Earl of Leven, but the successes of the Royalists under Montrose
frustrated these plans.
We cannot follow the movements of the opposing forces during'the
spring, but on the 14th June was fought the fatal battle of Naseby — fatal to
the Royal cause. The King's army was greatly out-numbered, and suffered
a signal defeat, from which his cause never recovered.
FORT ANCIENT, the Great Pre-historic Earthwork of Warren County,
Ohio, compiled from a careful Survey, with an account of its Mounds and
Graves, a Topographical Map, 35 full-page Prototypes, and Surveying
Notes in full. By Warren K. Moorhead, of the Smithsonian Institution,
Washington. Miss Millard, Teddington, Middlesex, 1890.
This great earthwork is described as "situated on a slightly rollino-
plateau " on the left bank of the Little Miami River, and as " the greatest
of all the Pre-historic Earthworks in the Mississippi basin." It has been
very carefully surveyed, mapped, and illustrated by the author and his
374 Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications.
assistants. It consists of two forts, called the New Fort and the Old Fort,
which are connected by a narrow neck or isthmus about a fifth of a mile in
length and strongly fortified at each end. The fortress lies about north-east
and south-west, and from point to point in a straight line measures about
5000 feet. The walls, which are composed of tough alluvial clay, and
average 9 or 10 feet in height, extend in circuit upwards of 10 miles. It
is remarkable that in some parts the ditch is within the walls, which are
very carefully and particularly described.
There are five " small mounds," or barrows, within the area of the New
Fort, and on the isthmus and Fort Ancient are numerous stone graves.
They were very carefully opened and drawings made and photographs taken
of their contents. It is stated that in the centre of the Old Fort is a large wal-
nut stump, around which are many graves, which are about 2^ft. in depth.
These graves are formed of limestones brought from the ravines adjacent or
the river valley below, and are placed on each side of the skeletons at the
head and at the feet and over them. The skeletons found in the cemetery
are said to be of an average size, being about 5 feet 6 ins. in height. In one
interment the skeleton was found quite complete and well preserved. It
had a large circle of stones placed around it. This is figured on PI. XXVI.
Together with it were found various relics : e.g., near the left shoulder were
remains of pottery broken into small fragments. Near the left femur was a
large spear-head of yellow flint, and near the right femur was a large stone
celt. About twenty skeletons were taken out of this graveyard in various
stages of decomposition. They were mostly much decayed. Some of them, the
author says, " were as deep below the surface as 3^ feet." But we must not
delay by giving a description of relics found in these interesting excavations,
but refer the reader to Mr. Moorhead's valuable volume. They consisted of
stone implements, axes, hammers, celts, &c, much resembling those found
in Europe.
In the river valley below Fort Ancient is the site of a large village. It
extended over a space about half a mile long and a quarter of a mile wide.
At the depth of 2 feet were found numerous bones of animals, ashes, and
fragments of pottery. The bones were mostly in small pieces, and not nearly
so numerous as those found at a depth of 4 feet ; shewing that 4 feet of soil
had accumulated since the former, or great village, had been abandoned, and
indicating that a long period of time had elapsed. At the lower level,
pottery of a beautiful texture and finish, and implements of a better character
were found than those discovered at the higher level.
The following description is given of the section of the excavations on the
site of the village: — First, there is a layer of loam about 2ft. thick, then there
is a thin deposit of ashes, charcoal, &c. Then there are from 2ft. to 30ins. of
sand and loam, and a heavy deposit of refuse. At 5ft. we find, in places, a
thick layer of bones, pottery, &c. ; it is not, however, continuous like the 4ft.
layer (before mentioned), and the village that left it was not so large as the
two later ones. In some excavations the bones are few, and the mussel
shells scarce. In others we seem to strike the site of a lodge and find many
remains of occupation.
A few pieces of pottery of a dark red colour, which were thick and
clumsy, and a few bird bones were all that were found at 2 ft. from the
Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications. 375
surface. From a depth of 2 ft. , until we reached a depth of 4 ft. , we found
nothing. At 4ft. we found the greatest deposit of objects described. At this
level we found a large black mass of ashes and soft earth, and burnt stone,
such as would result from long continued cooking on one spot of ground. In
this mass of ashes were the bones of 17 animals and birds and many fish scales.
We also took out 8 bone needles and awls, such as the women of the tribe
would use for the manufacture of garments of deer-skin. Some of the
pottery fragments found at this level were quite large and nicely decorated.
The bones represent the following animals and birds : — bear, deer, elk,
musk-rat, ground-hog, raccoon, squirrel, rabbit and wolf, wild turkey, wild
duck, hawk, owl, quail, cat-fish, turtle and gar. Deer antlers also were
taken out, some of which had been artificially sharpened to be used as needles
or perforators. The large bones of the deer and bear had been split to extract
the marrow.
One of the most interesting discoveries was the skeleton of a child 3 ft.
deep in the ground. It was 18 ins. in length, and was covered with large
stones. " It was nearly doubled up, as if it had been placed in a sitting
posture and allowed to fall over." In the grave, together with other relics,
was found a fine arrow-head of clear chalcedony. The skeleton of another
infant less than a foot in length was found in the same village site, as was
also that of a young woman about 20 years of age, whose skull is well
formed and the facial angle good ; and, it is remarked, that the skulls found on
Fort Ancient are a fine type with large brain cavity, indicating a superior
race of people, while some few skulls were found on the village site which
were very thick, low, and ill-shaped, the facial angle very acute, the fore-
head running immediately back, like that of an African, shewing that two
races of people had inhabited the village.
The book is stated to have been written in the field, which adds to its
interest, and may account for some defects in the arrangement, nevertheless
it is most interesting and valuable, though it sadly wants an index.
AN INTRODUCTION TO ENGLISH ECONOMIC HISTORY & THEORY.
By W. J. Ashley, M.A., Fellow of Lincoln College, Oxford. The Middle
Ages. London : Rivingtons, Waterloo Place, 1888.
Mr. Ashley introduces his subject with a description of the Agricultural
Condition of England in Mediaeval Times, explaining the working of the
Open Field System. He takes a very wide view of the subject, describing
the various theories which have been formed of the origin of manors from
that held by the late Mr. J. M. Kemble, now, we believe, generally exploded
as regards this country, down to that of Mr. Seebohm, whose system the
author very succinctly, lucidly, and favourably describes.
Our author draws attention to the great changes which had taken place
in the relative number of classes forming the population, and of the number
of individuals belonging to each class of the rural population as described in
Domesday, as well as in the customals of the end of the 13th century which
still exist. Whereas in the former record, generally, the population of a manor
was grouped chiefly under 3 grades : — villans, cottars or bordars, and serfs, or
slaves as he denominates them, in the latter appear 6 or 8 or even 10 classes.
376 Notices of Recent Arch-cological Publications.
He says " the changes appear bewildering in their complexity and variety,"
Such changes, however, appear natural in a period of two centuries. Besides
it may be observed that he has omitted to mention among the Domesday
grades those of freemen, radchenistre, &c. It must be admitted that, com-
paratively, these were few in number, nevertheless freemen are included in
the great Intpuest, and it is this class in which the greatest increase in
number, noticed by Mr. Ashley, is found. Other denominations also exist in
the record to which Mr. Ashley does not allude.
The great disparity in this proportionate number, especially in the class
of freeman, is very marked and the causes which led to it, as pointed out by
the author, are of much interest, and form not the least valuable portion of
the work.
Having disposed of the Manor and Village Community the author pro-
ceeds to shew what was the condition of the urban population in mediaeval
times. The great and beneficial influence exercised by the gilds during this
period is even yet scarcely recognised. They pervaded the whole of the dwellers
in large towns, extending into the smaller country towns, and even into coun-
try parishes. Mr. Ashley treats of the subject very comprehensively and clearly
under the several heads of The Merchant Gilds, the origin of the Craft Gilds,
and the relations between these two classes, which were not always amicable.
And an account is given of the Internal Organization of the latter. Of the
Social and Religious Gilds he does not write. Our space will not permit us to
treat so fully as we could wish of this valuable little work. We cannot, how-
ever, refrain from saying a few words on the subject of Craft Gilds, and, except
with reference to the crafts themselves, our remarks will also apply to the
Social Gilds. The objects of the ancient Gilds were very unlike those of the
modern Trades Union, which are based upon greed and fraudulent dealing. The
object of ancient Gilds was the general welfare of the Craft, Masters as well
as men. And this was sought to be attained by the use of the best materials
and the best workmanship, which were strictly supervised by the masters,
wardens, overseers, &c. , of the Gild who were elected annually in a full assem-
bly of the brethren. And an offending member was expelled by a similar full
meeting. The credit of the craft was at stake. And this sense of brotherhood
extended to every relation in life. If a member was sick he was visited by his
brethren, and every necessary, medically or otherwise, was provided for him
from the general stock. If he fell into poverty without any fault of his own,
he was assisted. If he died, the necessaries for his funeral were provided,
as were the religious rites and ceremonies, and the brethren of the Gild
attended his funeral, and, moreover, the interests of his children, if they
needed it, were carefully attended to.
The last chapter treats of "Economic Theories and Legislation. " Into
this we must not enter. It may suffice to say that it inculcates in all tran-
sactions the principle of just dealing between man and man. We have
seldom read a work with greater pleasure. It is brimful of information
throughout, and marks very exensive reading, and careful and close study.
Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications. 377
STUDIES IN EVOLUTION & BIOLOGY. By Alice Bodington. London :
Elliot Stock, 1890.
GLIMPSES INTO NATURE'S SECRETS, or Strolls on Beach and Down.
By Edward Martin. London : Elliot Stock, 1890.
PASSING THOUGHTS OF A WORKING-MAN. By Herbert Cloudesley
author of Sketches from Real Life. London : Elliot Stock, 1890
A CONSIDERATION OF GENTLE WAYS, and other Essays. By Edw.
Butler, author of Good Consideration. London : Elliot Stock, 1890.
NEWSPAPER REPORTING in olden time and to-day. By John Pendle-
ton, author of History of Derbyshire Ac. London : Elliot Stock, 1890.
We are much indebted to Mr. Stock for the above batch of little books, all
of which are of considerable interest, and we proceed to give short notices of
them seriatim.
Studies in Evolution and Biology. — This little volume forms a small
Manual on a very large and important subject, only recently introduced as a
science by the late Mr. Darwin, whose theory has been very hesitatingly
and cautiously received ; nevertheless the discoveries which have been since
made are certainly very startling. They cannot, however, we conceive, be
fully accepted at present. They require further careful investigation and
consideration.
The author says she is old enough to remember that most of the facts of
Zoology which were considered special stumbling blocks in accepting Dar-
win's theory of Evolution, proved special triumphs from the attention which
they drew ; amongst other objections it was said, if horses had been evolved
(from Eohippus, an animal about the size of a cat, the remains of which are
found in New Mexico, which is supposed to be the progenitor of the horse),
a five-toed form would have existed, and the five-toed form has been found.
And it is said that " The pedigree of the horse is one of peculiar interest
owing to the high state of specialization reached by this animal, and the
completeness with which every step in its progress has been followed. "
No scientist, we believe, denies that evolution to some extent may exist,
and we are willing to admit that disused members may, in the lapse of ages,
disappear or become modified and adapted to other purposes more suitable
to the environment of the animal, but we hesitate to accept all the theories
laid down.
The author gives a very interesting account of the evolution of the eye,
leading up to the most amazing description of the processes of evolution in
all classes of animals arising from their environment as regards climate,
food, natural selection, and other circumstances. All this is of great interest,
but it is impossible here to follow her through it, especially as Darwin and
his disciples differ in opinion upon the subject.
The most absorbing interest, however, is centred in the antiquity, greater
or less, of Man, and the work of the hands of Man, whch are more enduring
than Man himself. These have been found in the drift gravels of the tertiary
age, accompanied with the remains of the mammoth, the woolly rhinocerns,
the cave lion, the cave bear and other of the large mammalia, man's contem-
poraries
" We have no means," Sir John Lubbock says, " of measuring the antiquity
of Man, and it may be doubted whether even geologists realize the great
37S Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications.
antiquity of our race." Some have attributed to it millions of years, but these
estimates are avowedly conjectural and at best approximate. The changes
which have taken place since his appearance is evidence of a vast, we may
almost say an inconceivable period of time. .Sir John Lubbock writes: " The
climate of Europe has changed, valleys have been deepened, widened and
partially filled up again, caves through which subterranean rivers once
ran are now left dry, even the configuration of the land has been materially
altered, Africa finally separated from Europe," and, we may add, England
from France.
In California among the rude implements found with the remains of
Man, Mr. Wallace tells us (Nineteenth century, Vol. XXII , p. 676) that "in
1860-1869 many mortars, pestles, and other stone implements were found in
the lower gravels beneath lava beds, and in other auriferous gravels and clays
at a depth of 150 feet." This would certainly indicate that the fabricators
of these vessels could be none other than truly Man, and man possessed of
some amount of civilization. Can it be supposed, in the face of this fact,
that the theory of the author of the little book before us, that Man was
evolved from the Lemur, a monkey, of which living specimens are common
in the Island of Madagascar.
That man existed upon the earth before the Glacial period must be
admitted by every one who has at all considered the subject with a candid
mind. How much earlier there is, as yet, but doubtful evidence. Some
geologists believe that traces of Man have been found as early as the
Pliocene or even the Miocene epochs. The above admission, of course, in-
volves the existence of Man, perhaps various races of Man, before and at the
creation of Adam, though inferior to him who was created in the image of
Cod. There is not anything in this theoiy to question the authority of the
Book of Genesis — God forbid ! On the contrary it is, in our opinion, strictly
in accordance with, and confirms and supports, the text of Holy Scripture ;
but we cannot enter upon this subject here.
Glimpses into Nature's Secrets. — To all who take an interest in the
various living creatures they may see in their walks, and desire to become
acquainted with their habits and characteristics, this little volume will be
an acceptable acquisition, aud especially will it be so to young people and
intelligent children.
Mr. Martin divides his work into two sections. In the first he treats of
the more familiar of the creatures found on the sea beach. He directs
attention to the escallop, and points out the minute organisms which form
the thriving colonies on the back of his shell. Oysters, mussels, the sea
urchin and star-fish, together with numerous other waifs from the sea, which
thousands daily pass by unobserved, receive his attention and form subjects
for his interesting remarks or their habits and instincts.
The second section commences with the description of a "Ramble over
the Downs." which encircle on three sides the town of Brighton. In this
the author treats of a subject of a different class from that beforementioned,
though not of less interest. After describing, generally, the beautiful and
diversified scenery which this ramble affords — deversified by reason of the
geological formation of the district, shewing the changes which, during the
Notice* ok Recent Archaeological Pcblications. 379
lapse of untold ages, it has undergone, all of which he has explained, the
author proceeds to describe a geological journey across the country from
London to Brighton. This journey perhaps affords an opportunity of view-
ing as interesting and instructive a section of country as could readily be
found. To say nothing of the London basin, Mr. Martin conducts his readers
to some of the most illustrative sections shewn in precipices, railway cut-
tings, &c, which exhibit very fully the stratification of the counties of
Kent, Surrey, and Sussex. These chapters are pregnant with information
concerning the science of which they treat, delivered in a very pleasing
manner, and cannot fail to be interesting and instructive to all who have a
taste for the study of geology.
Passing Thoughts of a Working Man. — Whether or no the author of
these Essays be as he describes himself we cannot say. The first three "On
Woman" are crude and impracticable enough, but the remainder, especially
those on " Poetry," shew a degree of scholarship, culture and apt illustration
which we should not expect from a Working Man.
The writer is an ardent lover of Nature, and his descriptions shew a
remarkable faculty of observation and poetic description rarely met with
except in some of the best writers. Some portions are very amusing. We
can cordially commend the litle work to the perusal of all classes.
A Consideration of Gentle Ways. — The moral teaching of this little work
is excellent, except the chapter on " Parables and Apologues," the state-
ments in which are incorrect and offensive ; and the work, we think, is not a
safe one to put into the hands of children, or young persons, in consequence
of the indefinite religious opinions of the writer.
Newspaper Reporting. — Mr. Pendleton affords much curious information
upon a subject of the details of which the public have but little acquain-
tance, though the reporters are continually before us ministering to our curi-
osity or our knowledge. Though newspapers had their advent in England
no longer ago than the middle of the seventeenth century, by the ability and
dogged perseverance of the leaders of the press, undeterred by any false
sense of modesty, the Press has now become an important factor in State
affairs and in all commercial pursuits. The Newspaper Reporter is ubiqui-
tous. There is no public affair of interest, or event of importance, at which
he is not present to chronicle its history. Through his means, reports of the
debates in parliament at night are laid on our breakfast tables the follow-
ing morning, with the long speeches of our leading statesmen often printed
in extenso. The marvel is by what means is this great task effected ! Mr.
Pendleton takes us behind the scenes and shews us the machinery through
which it is accomplished. The recent practice of what is called "Interview-
ing " is, we consider, most objectionable.
But this is not all. The reporters even follow our armies into the field
of battle, and their reports have not unfrequently done much mischief in
consequence of their having wormed out secrets from the more inexperienced
officers, and published them in the newspapers, insomuch that some of the
more cautious of our Generals have forbidden the presence of reporters with
an army in the field.
380 Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications.
Mr. Pendleton traces the history of reporting from the old news-letters of
the 16th and 17th centuries down to the present time, and relates many
incidents and traditions of the " Galleries " of the Houses of Parliament, and
amusing anecdotes of the hattles between the reporters and the House of
Commons, in which the former were, eventually, the victors, and also some
remarkable experiences and adventures in carrying out their arduous duties.
The little book is very readable and in many parts amusing.
CALENDAR OF THE STATE PAPERS relating to Ireland, of the Reign
of Elizabeth, 1592, October— 1596, June, preserved in the Public Record
Office. Edited by Hans Claude Hamilton, Esq., F.S.A., late an Assistant
Record Keeper, under the direction of the Master of the Rolls and with
the sanction of Her Majesty's Secretary of State for the Home Department.
London : Printed for Her Majesty's Stationery Office by Eyre and Spottis-
woode, 1890.
We gladly welcome Mr. Hamilton's new volume of the Calendar of State
Papers for Ireland. The last volume was issued as long ago as 1886, but we
know that Mr. Hamilton has, from time to time, been taken off this work to
undertake duties considered to be of greater importance, or more pressing.
The last volume brought down the Irish Records to the end of September,
1592, and this commences on the 16th of the following month and extends
to the end of June, 1596, a period of three years and nine months.
In noticing the last volume (ante Vol. X., 346) we mentioned the defeat
and destruction of the great Spanish Armada, and commented on the bar-
barous cruelties perpetrated in cold blood by the Irish on the shipwrecked,
castaway, and defenceless Spanish seamen. The destruction of the great
fleet which had been prepared at an incalculable cost in confident expect-
ation of conquest, greatly mortified the pride of the Spanish monarch, whilst
the inhuman cruelties practised on his defenceless subjects naturally aroused
his wrath and indignation, and determined him to pursue the war by every
means in his power, and avenge the great indignity he had sustained and
the intolerable sufferings of his people.
The administration of the government of Ireland was at this time vested
in Sir William Fitzwilliams as Lord Deputy. Mr. Hamilton observes that
"he managed the Earl of Tyrone much better than did his successor, Sir
William Russell, for he knew not only the Earl, but also the valour and
disposition of his own English colleagues, and the best way to treat them.
As for Sir William Russell, his overbearing carriage towards Sir John
Norris and other eminent soldiers gave Tyrone ample opportunities to
secure a much firmer hold of confederates than could have been possible for
him under better and more united rule."
The Irish malcontent chieftains were only too ready to second the King
of Spain in his designs, and the arrival of Edmund M'Gauran, whom the
Pope, upon Philip's recommendation, had appointed Archbishop of Armagh
and Primate of Ireland, direct from the Spanish court with liberal promises
of support from the King, encouraged the northern chiefs in their rebellious
attitude, and the archbishop, who would seem to have been a man of cour-
age, tact, and ability, was very successful in reconciling any jealousies or
Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications. 381
differences which existed among them. Sir Richard Bingham, on the 6th of
June, reports to Burghley that " one M'Gauran, who terms himself Primate,
doth much mischief, riding on his chief horse with his staff and a shirt of
mail," but in the same month he was slain at Maghary with seven or eight of
the Maguires.
The death of M'Gauran brought the Earl of Tyrone to the front of the
rebels, though he did not appear publicly, but dissembled, protesting his
loyalty. He even went so far as to join Sir Henry Bagenall, the Marshal, in an
expedition against the Maguires, and crossing a ford called Cooloyne, near
Beleek, defeated them witli loss of more than one-third of their number. In
the pursuit he got shot through the leg with a dart, and would have been slain
had he not been rescued. He made a great parade of this wound as evidence
of his loyalty. Writing to the council on the 5th of November, he says, " If
I had been in good state of health, able to have written to you of the good
success which we have had against Maguire I would before this time
have informed you of the manner of this service, as how every man played
his part in the same to the honour of her Majesty, and to the confusion of
the rebel's force, but by reason it was my hap in that day's service to receive
a dangerous wound in my right leg, which [was] quite run through with a
spear, on account of which wound I am not yet able to stand but upon a
crutch, I could not as I fain would inform your Lordship of that matter.
Now that I feel in myself a little recovery and amendment of my hurt, I
thought good to signify unto you how that service was taken in hand and
performed ; being glad, though my hurt was sore, that for a testimony of
my loyalty and faithfulness to serve Her Majesty it was my chance to have
a print in my body of this day's service, as I have had many other before
this time ; not doubting that my blood now lost in this and other services
heretofore will satisfy the Queen's Majesty, and confirm her good opinion of
me and also your Lordships'." (170) A letter of commendation was written
to him by the council.
This skirmish was of considerable importance, as it was the cause of great
estrangement between the Earl and Bagenall, brothers-in-law though they
were, for the Earl had married a sister of the latter, and he considered that
the Marshal in his official report had not mentioned the Earl's services on
the occasion as being so important as the Earl himself considered them.
In 1594 a question of some moment arose as to the liberation of Florence
McCarthy Reagh, who had been kept a prisoner for many years under very
romantic circumstances. During the time of the Desmond troubles Queen
Elizabeth, in order, in some measure, to lessen the influence of that great
house in Munster, conferred an Earldom on Donnell McCarthy Mor. He
married a sister of the 15th Earl of Desmond, by whom he had issue a son
named Tadge, Lord Valentia, who died young s.p., and a daughter, Ellen,
who became the wife of Florence McCarthy, the supplicant for liberty above-
mentioned. After the death of his son, the Earl, who had always been ex-
travagant in his expenditure, became still more reckless. He obtained
money of a Mr. Nicholas Browne, an undertaker on the Geraldine estate in
Munster, and contemplated the settlement of this loan by giving his daugh-
ter, the Lady Ellen, who had become a great heiress, to Mr. Nicholas
Browne's son in marriage. To this proposal the young lady's mother would
not for a moment listen, deeming it a great disparagement to the blood of
Vol. XIV. 2b
382 Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications.
a McCarthy and a Desmond ; and early in 1589 a private marriage was
arranged between the Lady Ellen and Florence McCarthy. The result of
this runaway match would on the death of the Earl be the uniting of the
territories of McCarthy Reagh and McCarthy Mor in one person, and
the Desmonds having been destroyed, a McCarthy on such a scale, with
the influence arising from the alliances of the two united houses, would
become the strongest man in Munster ; and it was a settled policy of the
English government to break up the large and powerful estates. The Queen
was exceedingly wroth, and commanded that Florence should be sent a
prisoner to London, and he was committed to the Tower, where he remained
a close prisoner for two years. His wife meanwhile took refuge among her
own people. After the expiration of two years the Queen was pleased to
grant considerable amelioration of Florence's imprisonment. He was allowed
out of the Tower on parole, but he was to remain in London, or within three
miles of it, and not to approach the Court. His wife was permitted to be
with him, and this continued for another two years. His lands, however,
had been extented, so that he could not obtain any revenue from them. He
was consequently greatly in debt. His condition is shewn by the following
pathetic letter addressed to Lord Burghley. He is described as a scholar
and man of gigantic stature, notwithstanding which, he is said to have
"used his pen more readily than his sword." He was certainly an accom-
plished letter-writer.
1592. June 17.
" Right Hon. my most humble dutie remembered. Having heeretofore
divers times entreated your Hon. LoP to be a meane unto Her Ma1 that I
might have leve to go into my countrey, seeing that I have no means to
maintain myself here, and perceevinge by Your LoP at my being with your
Honor, that you moved Her Ma'tie therein, whom your Lor found unwilling
to grant it, I have thereupon caused my wife not to trouble Her Ma'tie any
further for the same, and willed her to sue for some maintenance whereby
myself and Shee might, until Her Ma'tie granted my liberty which she hath
don, still since my being with your LoP, all which time I could never acquaint
your LoP vv ithal, because I dare not go before your LoP or anywhere else abroad
for fear of being arested for myne owne and my wyfes diet ; and for as much
as she do fynd Her Ma'tie well inclined therunto, and that Her Highness
doth daily promise to give order to your LoP for her, I am therefore most
humblie to beseech your Hon. LoP to move Her Ma'tie now for me, and to be
a mean that I may be partly releived with some maintenance whereby myself
and my wife and folkes may live whyle Her Ma'tie shall think good to kepe me
here, beseeching Your LoP not to move Her Ma'tie for my liberty to go into
Ireland, because I am not desirous to go thither, knowing her Ma'tie to be
unwilling, as also that I have no meanes to leave my wife any maintenance,
who is great with child, and not able to go any where, thus beseeching your
LoP to be myndful of me herein, I humbly take leave this 16th of June 1592.
Yr LoPs most humble to command
fflor McCarthy."
This petition, seconded by the influence of Lord Burghley, was graciously
accepted by the Queen, and both suits were granted, the one immediately and
the other without any unnecessary delay. Florence did not receive a sum of
Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications. 383
money to meet his pressing needs, but what was for the time of equal value,
a protection against arrest for debt.
Florence had been married nearly four years and was still without issue,
and an announcement to Burghley that his wife was pregnant immediately
reached Ireland. The intelligence of his early return with the Queen's favour
caused the greatest consternation among those who were anxiously looking
for his ruin, and the expectation and hope of the birth of a son to inherit
Carbery from his father and Desmond from his mother, and save from ex-
tinction the historic designation of MacCarthy Mor stirred the hearts of the
men of Munster more than the birth of a royal child would have stirred the
feelings of Englishmen. A male child was born, and as soon as Lady Ellen
was sufficiently recovered she passed into Munster with the young heir. The
Bishop of Cork and Cloyne, one of Florence's adversaries, immediately wrote
to Sir Geoffry Fenton, which shews the manner in which the child was received
by his father's people : " Heare is a yonge childe of Fynnynge McChartyes,
who after this countrey manner is used amonge the people as a yonge Prince,
caryed abowt the contrey with three nurses and six horsemen, when he
removeth to anie place, and happie is he who can have him to foster for a
month, and so from moneth to moneth to the best of the contrey to be
fostred, with such songes of rejoycinge in the praise of his father Fynnynge
and the yonge Impe, that yt weare good that his father at his Comynge over
shold be looked unto, wch wilbe shortlie."
This, however, is a long story, and may be considered a digression, though
in the case of Florence it was a very important incident in Irish history. Mr.
Hamilton cites various documents connected with it, but full particulars of
great interest and historic value are given in "The Life and Letters of
Florence MacCarthy Reagh. Tanist of Carbery, MacCarthy Mor." By Daniel
MacCarthy Glas. Published 1867.
We must now return to the defeat of Maguire, the archtraitor, as he
is called, at the ford of Cooloyne, on the 10th of October, 1593. It appears
from a letter of the Lord Deputy to Burghley, on the 16th of the following
month, that Tyrone had entered very unwillingly into the conflict with
Maguire on that occasion, and had made an urgent effort to escape from it
on the previous day, and moreover kept his men sitting on their horses all
night close to Marshal Bagenal's camp, which the Lord Deputy considered a
very supicious circumstance. In his letter he encloses (with many other
documents) a Journal he had received of Bagenal's march through Fermanagh
(Maguire's country) between 16th Sept. and 24th Nov., which contains a
daily record of burning and destroying, seizing of cows, and hanging of men ;
and ten days later we read (p. 192) that Sir George Bingham had sent to his
brother, Sir Richard Bingham, Governor of Connaught, from The Boyle a
horse load of heads of Tumultagh Bane, Edmund Duff, and thirty knaves
more. It goes on to say " the draught was by a man from whom they had
taken ten cows when they spoiled William M'Costello, and following the
villains for his cows could get none, yet they going to the north to Maguire
and 0 Donnell, he staid in Terehale till they returned, and now Tumultagh
Bane having his friends about him at this Christmas, lacked butter ; to
supply which want this poor man promised his help and came in all haste
unto me. He handled the matter wonderfully well, for the place is 12 miles
from the Boyle, and my cousin Martenie and the soldiers behaved themselves
2 b2
384 Notices of Recent Archaeological Phblications.
very gallantly and painfully, who departed about 3 o'clock in the afternoon,
and by 8 o'clock had dispatched their business."
The Boyle, 1593, Dec. 17th.
We are not surprised to read a little further on (p. 252) that " the whole
of Fermanagh was left desolate, and the people fled. The richest and best
of the county are fled to the traitor, who is very strong."
Whether or no after his defeat at the ford of Cooloyne Maguire took
temporary refuge in his stronghold of Enniskillen Castle is not stated. Capt.
Dowdall, who had distinguished himself in the fight at the ford, was after-
wards placed in charge of the garrison left there, and of the whole of the
force against Maguire. He laid siege to the Castle of Enniskillen, and after
nine days' investment took it by assault on 2nd February, 1593-4, and was
afterwards knighted. A Mr. James Eccersall was appointed constable, and
on the 22nd May following it is stated that on the 17th of that month
Maguire, the Earl of Tyrone's brother, and the chief est men of Tyrone, had
had come with a large force and had closely invested the castle. A sharp
engagement ensued on the same day (250), and on the 8th June he prays
he may be relieved in good time, and on the 11th he complains of the
wicked practices of Maguire against the castle by drafts, ambushes, and
treacheries (255). Sir William Russell, who was appointed to succeed Sir
William Fitz Williams, who had resigned on account of ill-health, arrived
on the 3rd August, and at once complained of want of money, and delayed
to receive the sword until he may have more money and men, as the
present rebellion requires, saying the enemy groweth very strong. It is
thought that 700 men will not be able to relieve the castle of Enniskillen.
On the 11th he received the sword, and on the 19th he marched to the
relief of Enniskillen at the head of 1000 foot and 200 horse, and effected
temporary relief. In the meanwhile the Earl of Tyrone had come in volun-
tarily, making all kinds of professions of loyalty and promises, to cajole the
new Deputy, not one of which he kept Russell, after a forced and difficult
inarch over mountains and through bogs, arrived at Enniskillen on the 30th
August. On the 15th Jan. 1594-5, the Lord Deputy urges upon Burghley
that if forces be not sent both Enniskillen and the north will be lost. Such
is the strong combination of the Earl of Tyrone that there is not any dare
shew himself a dutiful subject. On the 18th May, 1595, the Lord Deputy
and Council report that Enniskillen had fallen, but not without suspicion of
treason ; that the constable and warders had come out with bag and baggage,
and promise of life, but were immediately put to the sword by the traitors
(317).
On the 23rd June, 1595, Tyrone, O'Donnel, O'Rourke, Maguire and Mac-
Maho'n were proclaimed traitors, and from this date the northern rebellion
may be said to have commenced. On 9th Sept. of the same year, is announced
the death of old Sir Turlough Lynagh O'Neill (The O Neill), father of the
Earl, and that the Earl had become The O'Neill.
Sir William Russell had asked for a good officer to help him, but to his
great disgust the Queen sent him Sir John Norris, as General of Her
Majesty's Army, with almost unlimited authority. This naturally produced
an ill-feeling between the Lord Deputy and himself, and increased the
jealousies which had continuously prevailed among the chief of the English
Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications. 385
officers in Ireland, and, coupled with the extreme parsimony of the Queen,
formed the bane of every administration in Ireland during her reign.
The disordered condition of this unhappy country continued, and, indeed,
rather increased, a series of skirmishes, truces broken as soon as made
would seem to have continued during the whole period covered by this
volume, but we mast conclude our notice of this, unhappily the last of Mr.
Hamilton's volumes, with the hope that his successor may possess as great a
knowledge of Irish affairs as himself.
IRELAND UNDER THE TUDORS, with a succinct account of the earlier
History. By Richard Bagwell, M.A., in 3 volumes, Vol. III. London :
Longmans, Green & Co., 1890.
{Second Notice.)
Ix writing our notice of the first two volumes of this valuable work (ante
Vol. X. , p. 320 ) we were misled by the title pages in concluding that those
volumes concluded Mr. Bagwell's work, and expressed our regret that he
should not have carried his history down to the end of the Tudor dynasty.
We were glad, therefore, to receive this third bulky volume, of still greater
interest, in continuation of the two former.
Mr. Bagwell resumes his narrative from the year 1579, during the
interval between the departure of Sir Henry Sidney, Lord Deputy, and the
transfer of the sword to Henry Lord Grey of Wilton.
The administration was first temporarily entrusted to Sir William Drury,
in whose period of government the rebellion of James Fitzmaurice of Des-
mond broke out.
This James was the nephew of Gerald, the 15th Earl of Desmond, being
the son of Maurice Fitz John, a younger son of James Fitz John, the 14th
Earl. He was a man of very high character, as described by Mr. Thomas
Russell in his "Relation of the Fitzgeralds of Ireland, written in 1638,"
and printed in the Journal of the Royal Historical and Archaeological
Association of Ireland.
Fitzmaurice landed at the Dingle, in Kerry, on the 17th July, 1579, as
reported by the Portreeve, and issued two proclamations stating very
plausibly what were his objects. The Irish government hearing of his dis-
embarkation sent one Henry Davels, a Devonshire gentleman, well known
and highly respected in Ireland, and then Sheriff of Cork, godfather to Sir
John of Desmond, to warn the Earl and his brothers, and endeavour to encour-
age them in their allegiance. Their mission was not a successful one, and
the messengers on their return towards home were followed by the Earl's
two brothers, who overtook them at Tralee, and both were basely and
brutally murdered in their bed. The circumstances are too well known to
need repetition here. Before he had been in Ireland quite a month James
Fitzmaurice himself %vas slain under very tragic circumstances, the details of
which, as stated by Mr. Bagwell, differ considerably from those related in 1638
by Mr. Russell, but agreeing in this that Fitzmaurice in a brawl with Theobald
Burke and his brothers, his near relations (according to Mr.Bedwell) the sous
of Sir William Burke, when one of the retainers of the Burkes shot Fitz-
maurice in the breast, who feeling that he was mortally wounded mu.de a
desperate dash forward, killed Theobald Burke and one of his bru.hars, a id
386 Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications.
then fell and breathed his last. This was the beginning of the decay of the
great house of Desmond. The Queen so sympathized with the deed that
she created Sir William Baron of Castle Connell immediately afterwards.
Sir John and James of Desmond received Fitzmaurice with open arms, whilst
the Earl, their brother, though equally well disposed, prudently dissembled.
Sir John, immediately on the death of Fitzmaurice, stepped into his place as
leader of the rebellion. The Earl still held aloof, and even went so far as to
take part in an expedition against the rebels. But the time soon came when
he could dally no longer. He was summoned to appear before the Lord Jus-
tice to answer to certain charges alleged against him, and was told to lose no
time, for the Lord Justice was determined not to be idle. A certain day
was given to him, and he was warned that his proclamation as traitor was
ready, and in case of his default would be published ; but he came not. A
last chance was given him, still he came not ; and the die was cast. The
fate of the ancient and historic house of Desmond was sealed.
The rigours of the war which now ensued were very severe. The whole
country was burned and wasted. The cows, whose milk formed the chief
support of the natives, were stolen and slaughtered, and the population,
men, women and children, left to absolute starvation, or put to the sword, a
cruelty perhaps more revolting, but not more cruel than starvation, and that
these acts should be perpetrated under the direction of cultured English
gentlemen makes one blush for shame.
Sir William Drury, already in feeble health, was quite worn out by the
strain upon him, and was obliged to resign his office, and died at Waterford
on 30th Sept. 1579. He was succeeded by Sir William Pelham as Lord
Justice, with the Earl of Ormonde as Lord General. These two met at
Rathkeale and commenced a work of destruction. " The Earl " Mr. Bagwell
says, " took the Shannon side and the Lord Justice kept inland, spoiling the
country far and wide, and meeting no enemy. According to the Four Masters,
they killed blind and feeble men, women, boys and girls, sick people, idiots
and old people. Four hundred were killed in the woods on the first day,
and everything that would burn was burned," The fate of a castle belonging
to Ulick Burke is thus concisely described : "I put the band, both men,
women and children to the sword." Maltby was playing the same game in
in Connaught. It is said that Richard Burke, called Richard in Iron, finding
that Maltby was too strong for him said he was ready to submit. His castle
was on one of the islands in Clew Bay. Maltby sent to Achill for boats, but
the weather was so bad that he could not reach the island for a week. In
the meantime more than 100 of Richard's followers had died of starvation.
It is only just to the Queen to say she was greatly displeased at these
atrocities. Pelham's commission was revoked on the loth July, 1. 580, and
Arthur Lord Grey, of Wilton, K.G., was appointed to succeed him as Lord
Deputy ; but in the interval between the sealing of the Patent and his
arrival in Ireland, Pelham determined to make the best of his time in carry-
ing out his policy. There seemed about this time a disposition among some
of the leaders of the rebellion to make their submission, but it was required
of all important persons sueing for mercy that they must first imbrue their
hands in some better blood than their own. Among others, Sir John of
Desmond sought to confer with Sir Warham St. Leger, and was told he could
Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications. 3S7
have his own life by giving up his eldest brother, the Earl, Dr. Sanders,
and the Seneschal of Immokilly. The most important event, however, which
marked the remainder of Pelham's administration was the capture and
execution of Sir James of Desmond. He was wounded in a skirmish and
taken, and carried to Cork, where he was tried and condemned, and hanged
drawn and quartered, having in vain begged for summary decapitation to
avoid a public trial.
Lord Grey arrived on the 12th August, 1580, and was sworn on the 7th
September following. He was instructed by the Queen to deal severely with
" notorious transgressors of the law." On the other hand the Queen said,
" she was anxious to have it known that she did not wish to extirpate the
inhabitants of Ireland, as it had been falsely maliciously reported. Outrages
committed by soldiers were to be severely punished, and officers of high rank
were not to be exempt."
Grey, on his arrival, found the country in frightful disorder. Pelham,
before leaving Minister for Dublin, had placed the army under the command
of Sir George Bouchier,who immediately entered Kerry with 600 or 700 men,
and with the help of Lord Fitzmaurine began to devastate the country still
further. He said his commission was to burn their corn, spoil their harvest,
and kill and drive their cattle ; but Winter prevailed upon him to spare
them on the condition of their maintaining a garrison of 200 foot and 30
horse at Tralee, and give hostages for their good behaviour, otherwise Sir
George would execute his commission strictly. (68)
Winter now left, and within a few days a body of Spaniards landed at
Smerwick. We cannot enter into details which are pretty well known.
Eventually the Spaniards surrendered, unconditionally, and 600 men were
slain in cold blood, Walter Raleigh being one of the Captains on duty that
superintended the butchery.
The administration of Lord Grey was very unsatisfactory to the Queen,
and she summoned him to London on the 14th July, 15S2, to confer with
her on the affairs of Ireland, at the same time expressing an intention of
sending him back again, which she never did, and Archbishop Loftus and
Sir Henry Wallop, Lords Justices, were appointed to act in his absence.
Grey was called the friend and hero of Spenser, nevertheless, Spenser des-
cribes him as a "bloody man who regarded not the life of Her Majesty's
subjects no more than dogs, but had wasted and consumed all, so as now she
hath nothing almost left but to reign in their ashes," and still more harrow-
ing details. St. Leger states that "nine-tenths of the men had succumbed
to the sword, the halter, or the pestilence." One circumstance of note, which,
if proper advantage of it had been taken, might have been of great benefit
to the country — the death of Sir John of Desmond, who was accidentally
found almost alone and without defensive armour, and slain on the spot.
He was the life and soul of the rebellion, and if this blow, Mr. Bagwell
thinks, had been promptly followed up, all would soon have been over. But
the Queen " thereupon " ordered the discharge of 700 men.
Loftus and Wallop were more successful in their administration than
Grey had been. They were fortunate, in being able to quell the Minister
rebellion. Most of the principal Irish chieftains came in to Ormonde at
Cork and made their submission on 10th July, 1.380, giving pledges for their
future loyalty, and in the mouth of November following the Earl of Desmond
3S8 Notices of Recent Akch.eological Publications.
fell into the hands of the O'Moriarties by a surprise at night. He was taken
from his bed, half asleep, and fearing a rescue they cut off his head on the
spot. Thus fell the last of the great and powerful Earls of Desmond. He
was afterwards attainted and 000,000 acres of land were forfeited to the
crown. The death of the Earl, the particulars of which are fully given by
Mr. Bagwell, was the last event of importance during the administration of
the Lords Justices.
Sir John Perrott was appointed to succeed Lord Grey, by Patent dated
7th January, 15S3-4. He arrived in Dublin, 9th June, and was sworn on the
21st of the same month. He was a man of an irascible temperament, but in
his speech on his installation he gave great satisfaction to the Irish. He said
that the Queen held her subjects of Ireland equal to those of England, and
that her care, as well as his own, was to make them equally happy by means
of good government. He also remarked that he wished to suppress " the
name of a churl and crushing of churl," and to substitute such terms, as
husbandman, franklin, and yeoman. But he gave great offence next day by
not treating the English officers and members of the council with, as they
thought, proper respect. This was especially felt by Archbishop Loftus and
Vice Treasurer Wallop, who in place stood next to the Deputy, and who had
virtually exercised the government for the last two years.
Although it was said that Minister was completely cowed, Sir William
Stanley, who governed the province during Sir John Norris's absence in the
north, found pretences for 300 executions. This he alleged " terrified them
so that a man now may travel the whole country and none to molest him."
The President, on his return, declared the country was a waste and depopu-
late. Even malefactors were scarce, and there was no chance of re-settling
the province but by importing people."
We have alluded above to Sir John Perrott's inaugural address as Lord
Deputy, and, we believe, he honestly endeavoured to carry out his promises.
This was recognised by the Irish, and he became popular with all classes of
that people, and they placed confidence in him, to which, probably his fine
presence, dignified manner, open bearing and, substantially, fair-dealing,
doutblessly contributed. He succeeded in achieving a task which Sidney
attempted without success. He induced one-third of the chieftains and
others of Connaught to be willing to surrender their lands to the Queen, to
receive them back again by Letters Patent at fixed rents. The plan of the
composition was a good one, but it was not generally accepted, and even-
tually it fell through. With his council and his English officials he could
not succeed. He suffered much in health, and the climate did not suit him,
and, doubtless, he was oftentimes rude and overbearing, but he was honest
in all his intentions. It was manifest, however, that good government
under these conditions was impossible.
Soon after Perrott's arrival he heard of an irruption of Scots into Ulster,
and he hastened to meet them, but, to his great disappointment, on his
arrival there, he found they were all gone, Elizabeth was much displeased,
and wrote to him a severe letter on the subject. The Scots next invaded
Connaught, but Bingham made a gallant forced march at night, surprised
and charged them before they were aware of his presence. The enemy fled
at once, and the slaughter was terrible. " I was never," Capt. Woodhouse
Notices of Recent Akch.eological Publications. 389
said, " so weary with killing of men, for I protest to God, for as fast as I
could I did but hough and paunch them. In an hour it was all over."
Perrott had been long desirous to be relieved of his charge. His recall,
however, it is apprehended, was due rather to the acts of his enemies than in
deference to his wishes. All he requested, however, was that Sir William
Fitz Williams, who was appointed to succeed him, might come at once, but
he came not for six months. Mr. Bagwell writes : " when at last the time
arrived for delivering the sword to his successor, he presented to the Cor-
poration of Dublin a silver gilt bowl with his arms and crest and the words
relinquo in pace " thereon, and he left the country in perfect peace. He said
to the new Deputy : " There is no ill-minded or suspected person in this
kingdom, which can carry but six swords after him into the field, but if you
will name him and shall desire to have him, notwithstanding that I have
resigned the sword, yet .... if they come not on my word, I will lose the
merit and reputation of all my service," Fitzwilliams replied that it needed
it not, for all was well.
Three days later Perrott left Ireland for ever. "A great number of noble-
men and gentlemen came to see him off, among whom old Tirlogh Luinleach
was conspicuous. That representative of an order that had almost passed
away accompanied him to the ship, and would not put off until the last
moment. He watched the retreating sail until it was below the horizon, and
then shed tears ' as if he had been beaten.' Nor was it only lords and chiefs
who mourned for Perrott. The poor came forty miles to see him pass, pray-
ing for his long life and striving to take his hand if possible, or to touch the
hem of his garment. When he asked them why they did so, they answered,
' That they had never enjoyed their own with peace before his time and did
doubt that they never should do so again when he was gone.' " Perrott pro-
ceeded direct to his home at Carew Castle, Pembrokeshire.
We must add a few lines as to the fate of Perrott, whose enemies followed
him to England with false accusations of treason, producing a letter, alleged
to have been written by him offering the Crown of England to Philip of
Spain on condition of being made hereditary Prince of Wales. The letter
was shewn to have been forged by one Charles Trevor and one Dennis
Roughan, both of bad character, the former a convicted perjurer and the lat-
ter a renegade priest, whom Perrott had imprisoned. Perrott was brought
to trial for high treason upon this evidence. He would not condescend to
employ lawyers to defend him. " On one side," writes Mr. Bagwell, "were
Popham, Egerton and Puckering, (eminent lawyers), and on the other a rough
old Knight, conscious of many rash speeches but strong in the confidence
which innocence gives, and renouncing the merits and mercy of his Saviour
Jesus Christ if he was really guilty. He was supposed to be the illegitimate
son of King Hen. VIII. , whom he much resembled in person, voice and man-
ners. He could do little but protest that he was innocent and that Roughan
and Williams (witnesses against him) were perjured scoundrels. He was
declared guilty, and Naunton says that on his return to the Tower after his
trial, he said, in oaths and fury, to the Lieutenant, Sir Owen Hopton —
"What, will the Queen suffer her brother to be offered up as a sacrifice to
my frisking adversaries," The Queen, when told of his speech to Hopton
and the warrant for his execution was presented to her for signature, refused
390 Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications.
to sign it, and swore by Goi>\s death he should not die, that they were all
knaves, and that he was a honest and faithful man.
This brings down the history of Ireland to the end of the first great
rebellion of Queen Elizabeth's reign, and we must here stay our hand, for we
have greatly over-run our space, but we hope to return to this interesting
volume later on.
HALLEN'S LONDON CITY CHURCH REGISTERS— St. Botolph,
Bishopsgate, 1558-1753. Transcribed by A.W. Cornelius Hallem, M.A.,
Aloa, N.B., 1890.
Since our last notice of these valuable Registers (Vol. XIII. p. 409) Mr. Hallen
continues to make steady progress. Vol. I. with Title-page and Index, has
now been completed and issued to the subscribers, and to the Index has been
added a short Appendix containing certain names which, by some accident,
were overlooked in arranging the slips. For this Mr. Hallen apologises,
saying the labour in issuing this series single handed is very severe, and
expresses a hope that as the value of the transcripts become better known,
and subscribers increase, he may be able to put the Index into professional
hands, and thus avoid the blemishes to be found in this volume, some of
which he has corrected, and further additions and corrections will be found
in Vol. II.
In our last notice we stated that of Vol. II. 440 pages had then been
printed, and at the present time the printing of the text has been extended
to 632 pages, and the Index to that volume has been worked oft' as far as
GRA of the alphabet ; and the printing of Vol. III. has been commenced,
and 208 pages worked off, bringing down the Baptisms to 1667.
We have only to add that the Editorial care and the beauty of the letter-
press continues as perfect as at first.
THE ANTIQUARY.— A Magazine devoted to the Study of the Past.
Vol. XXL, January to June, 1890. London : Elliot Stock, 1890.
The "Antiquary" has always been remarkably well conducted, but we
must confess that under the care of the new Editor it has improved, at least
we consider the volume before us exceptionally good. The Papers, generally,
are so interesting it is difficult, and may perhaps be thought invidious, to
select any for special remark ; nevertheless, there are a few to which we
should like to invite attention. Among these we would mention the late Mr.
H. H. Lines's treatise "On Roman Castrametation," who gave twenty years
study to the subject on which he wrote. It has not been before published,
and has been obtained for the " Antiquary " through the kindness of Mr.
Morris C. Jones, F.S.A., the well-known Hon. Secretary of the Powis-land
Club. The Paper will repay careful and studious reading.
The " Notes on the late Tudor Exhibition," by the Hon. Harold Dillon,
F.S.A., and Secretary to the Society, are well deserving special attention.
Mr. Dillon's remarks on " The Armoury of Henry VIII. and on the Portraits
in the Exhibition " are of much interest, and his pertinent enquiry as to
what has become cf all the splendid jewelry which bedeck the Royal and
Noble portraits is not easily answered. A treatise on the ' ' Armour and
Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications. 391
Arms at the Tudor Exhibition," by the Baron de Cosson, F.S.A., F.R.G.S.,
should not be passed by, as the Baron is the highest authority we have, or
perhaps in Europe, on the subject. Whilst praising the magnificence of the
collection, as far as it goes, he laments the loss of much which must have
existed during the Tudor period. He says that " a glance around the room
will shew that English gentlemen of that time were not behind their foreign
brethren in their appreciation of richly-wrought helmet, breast-plate, sword
or dagger," and he continues : " Fine as the assemblage of the arms and
armour at the New Gallery is, it cannot represent a tithe of all the varied
forms of arms of offence and defence devised by the active ingenuity of the
craftsmen of those times, nor of the wealth of artistic invention lavished on
them by men who were in every sense of the term artists." He then proceeds
to comment on the historical pieces hi chronological order.
The Baron supplies another Paper which merits notice " On a Collection
of Sporting Weapons at the Grosvenor Gallery," brought together mainly
through the energy of Mr. W. H. Spiller, the Hon. Secretary of "that
armour-loving fraternity known as the Kernoozers Club." This is very
curious as shewing the origin and growth of sporting weapons as compared
with their present perfection.
A series of Papers entitled "The Conference" is commenced in this
volume, and is of great interest. The first treats of "Marking of Ecclesi-
astical Altar Stones," in which various writers take part. In the next
Conference the vexed question of the " Low Side Windows " is discussed,
and also illustrated ; the writers describe many examples found in various
places, but any decision on the purpose of the construction and use of these
remarkable windows would seem to be as distant as ever. There is another
discussion on the "Preservation of Local Records." We think there are
many strong objections to the removal of Local Records from the locality to
which they specially relate. It would, we think, be better to appoint
some properly qualified gentleman in each county as conservator of the
records of the county, who should be held responsible for their safe keeping,
and be authorised to make annual circuits of inspection at the charge of the
county. There are various other Papers which merit special attention, e.y. a
series of articles "On Holy Wells, their Legends and Superstitions," arranged
alphabetically under counties, by Mr. R. C. Hope, F.S.A. ; "On Mediaeval
Tiles in the Priory Church of Great Malvern, and on the Chase and Manor,"
by the Rev. Alfred S. Porter, M. A., F.S.A. ; " On the Manor House of South
Wraxall," and there are others we would fain mention did space permit.
CHURCH PLATE IN KENT. By the Rev. W. A. Scott Robertson, M.A.,
Honorary Canon of Canterbury, and Vicar of Throwley. Part II. Parochial
Inventories. London : Mitchell & Hughes, Wardour Street, W.
We gladly welcome another fasciculus of Canon Scott Robertson's "Church
Plate of Kent." This Part contains the " Parochial Inventories," the
parishes being alphabetically arranged, and extending from Acrise to Can-
terbury Cathedral. The description of the Plate is given in great detail,
and in the case of Donors the Author has given some biographical and
genealogical account of them, together with the blazon of any Arms which
may be engraven on the pieces. He seems to have obtained the co-operation
392 Notices of Recest Archaeological Publications.
of the parochial clergy and churchwardens, whose valuable assistance he
cordially acknowledges. The Kentish clergy seem to possess an unusual
knowledge of the specialities of Old Plate.
No piece of mediaeval date is noticed. There are several unusually
Early Elizabethan Cups, ranging from 1562 to 1564, mentioned. They seem
to possess some of the characteristics of the well-known types so widely
brought into use some eight or ten years later, but differ in details.
Two or three remarkable pieces are brought under notice and illustrated :
e.g. at Bonnington is a porringer, which is used as a Chalice. No date
letter can be traced, but it bears the trade mark of Thomas Whipham and
Charles Wright, well-known silversmiths, which fixes the date from 1757 to
1759. At Bredgar is a handsome repousse" dish, used as a Paten, for which
use it is wholly unsuitable, or indeed for any other ecclesiastical purpose.
It is 8^ inches in diameter, and was made in 1631-2. It was presented to
the Church by Mrs. Margaret Aldersey, of Swanton Court, who gave a
similar, though smaller, dish to the Church of Bicknor, and it is said there
are two or three belonging to other Kentish Churches. The dish is suitable
for sweetmeats or other dessert condiments, and were it not that the pieces
vary in date a few years, we should be disposed to suggest that Mrs.
Aldersey had divided her dessert service between some of the Churches in
which she was interested.
NOTES AND QUERIES.
Gloucestershire Notes and Queries. Edited by the Rev. Beaver H.
Blacker, M.A. London : Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent & Co., 1890.
Part XLVIII, just issued, completes the 5th volume of the Gloucestershire
Notes and Queries, save the Index, which, we presume, will follow. The
work still maintains its position as among the best of this class of publi-
cations, now, we are glad to say, so growing in popularity that there are
few counties without its representative. The bulky volume now before us
extends to nearly 700 pages, exclusive of Notices of Books and the Index.
We are sorry, however, to notice that the Editor has cause to complain that
he does not receive that support, either by literary contributions or sub-
scriptions, which is necessary for the satisfactory conduct of the work. He
announces that in the future volumes some slight changes will be made
which will tend to the increased value, and will improve the appearance, of
the work. We think, however, that, in appearance, it is already all that
can be desired in a work of the kind.
There are many notes in the present volume of considerable interest and
value. First among them we will mention a series of Extracts from the
Close Rolls of the time of Henry III. relating to Gloucestershire, which
contain many entries of interest. A list of fifty-six of the Largest Churches
in England, among which are four in this county : viz., Gloucester Cathedral,
Tewkesbury Abbey, Bristol Cathedral, and St. Mary Redcliffe Church,
Bristol, which, in regard to proportions, stand in the list as the 16th, 22nd,
26th and 40th. The part is rich in monumental inscriptions. They are given
from the churches of Stonehouse, Brimscombe, Filton, King's Stanley, Rod-
borough, Randwick, St. Werburgh (Bristol), Brockworth, St. George's
(Brandon Hill, Bristol), Cheltenham, Cromhall, and Christ Church (Bristol) ;
and Extracts from the Parish Registers of Maismore, and Rockhampton Par-
ish Accounts all of which are valuable for Genealogical purposes. We should
Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications. 393
also mention some very interesting Letters of Alexander Pope, giving a par-
ticular description of Bristol in 1739. It would be easy to cite many others.
Notes and Queries for Somerset and Dorset, Parts VII. to XI. Edited
by Hugh Morris, South Petherton (Local Secretary for Somerset to the
Society of Antiquaries of London), and Charles Herbert Mayo, M.A.
(Vicar of Long Burton with Holnest, and Rural Dean, author of Bibliotheca
Dorsetiensis). Sherborne : Printed by J. C. Sawtell.
The first volume of this serial, the first six Parts of which we noticed in our
last volume, was completed with the eighth Part at the close of 1889 ; and
the portion we now notice includes two Parts, containing 120 pages of
Volume II. The Papers now given are equal in interest to those we have
already noticed. Part VII. opens with a Court Roll of the Abbey of
Shaftesbury, dated in the 32nd Henry VI. (1453). We find also a series
of Papers on the Genealogy of Strode, of Shepton Mallet, accompanied
by a pedigree contributed by Mr. G. Milner-Gibson-Cullam, F.S.A., of
Hardwick House, Suffolk, shewing its connection with the Cullums, of Ealing,
and in connection with this is a note on John Strode, of Knighton
or Ryme. There is also a memoir of Hugh Speke, son of George Speke, of
White Lackington, Som. , shewing the secret history of the Revolution of
1688, continued from Volume I. and concluded. Mr. J. E. Nightingale,
of Wilton, contributes a Grant of Arms made in 1546, by Christopher
Barker, Garter, to John Skutt, of Strawton, Somerset, an ancestor of the
Earls of Shaftesbury, by whom the arms thus granted are quartered.
Mr. Nightingale remarks from Anstis's Coll. of Heraldry, that Grants of
Arms were made at this time for a consideration, by order of Charles
Brandon, Duke of Suffolk, Earl Marshal, the rates varying from £6 13s. 4d.
to £5, but the difference in the value of money must be remembered. We
observe also an interesting memoir of the Family of Daubeney in connection
with the Memorial Brass of Sir Giles Daubeney and Joan Darcy, his second
wife, in South Petherton Church. In the Parts before us a discussion is
raised on the subject of ancient Terrace Cultivation, which is considered by
Mr. Lawrence Gomme to be, probably, remains of Iberic or non-Aryan
races of Britain. Mr. G. S. Fry contributes a series of Papers on Dorset
Administrations of Estates of Intestates, extracted from the records of the
Prerogative Court of Canterbury, now at Somerset House — a most useful
list. Mr. H. A. Helyar, of Coker Court, and of Her Majesty's Diplomatic
Service, contributes two valuable historical letters of Mr. Edward Phelips,
of Pylle, Somerset, addressed to Mr. H. A. Helyar's ancestor, Col. Helyar,
of East Coker, illustrating the Sedgmoor campaign against the Duke of
Monmouth. Mr. Arthur A. Jewers furnishes two lists of Commonwealth
Marriages in Somerset, a large number of which are not recorded in the
Parish Registers. Many of the Papers, in addition to those we have cited,
are well worthy of notice.
The Scottish Antiquary, or Northern Notes and Queries, Vol. V. Edited
by the Rev. A. W. Cornelius Hallen, M.A., F.S.A. {Scot.)
Since our last notice of " Northern Notes and Queries " (Vol. XIII., p. 413)
the title of this periodical has been changed from ' ' The Northern Notes and
Queries & Scottish Antiquary " to " The Scottish Antiquary and Northern
394 Notices of Recent Archaeological Publications.
Notes and Queries," and Mr. David Douglas is no longer the publisher. It
is still under the skilful Editorship of Mr. Hallen, so we apprehend no
change will arise in the conduct of the work. The articles commenced under
the former title are continued.
The new volume commences with the genealogy of the Stewarts of
Rosyth and Craigyhall, in the counties of Fife and Linlithgow, respectively,
descended from Sir John Stewart, of Bonkye, a younger son of Alexander,
the fourth High Steward of Scotland. This is almost immediately followed
by a most interesting letter from the Prince, commonly known in England
as the " Old Pretender," the son and heir of James II. of England and VI.
of Scotland. The history of the Ross Family is continued from the last
volume. An interesting document is given, being a list of the noblemen,
gentlemen and others who were attainted of High Treason after the '45.
There is also an article on Orkney Folk lore, and there are interesting Notes
and Replies to Queries.
Cymru Fu. — Notes and Queries relating to the past history of Wales and the
Border Counties, Vol. II., Parts 5 and 6. Edited by George H. Brierley.
These two Half-yearly Parts of " Cymru Fu " have been issued since our
last notice, and they sustain the favourable opinion of the periodical ex-
pressed in the notice alluded to. Among the valuable contributions now
printed we may mention : " An attempt by Mr. W. H. Green to define the
boundaries of what is called the Ancient Kingdom of Ergynfield, on the
Wye (the Archenfield district), from a List of the Churches given in the
Liber Landavensis, but the locality of many of them Mr. Green has, un-
fortunately, not been able to identify, though he considers it included
Monmouth and extended close to Hereford, but excluded Ross, at which he
is surprised, for, according to tradition, Ross was one of the most important
places in the Kingdom of Ergyng. He says we read " that shortly before
the reign of King Arthur, who was crowned at Caerleon 517, and the close of
the 5th century (? 6th) the celebrated Dubritius, illegitimate son of Pepiau,
King of Ergyng, was born at Madeley, (but he omits to cite the work in
which this statement appears.) From this he infers that the limits given
in the Liber Landavensis were considerably exceeded in prior times. Com-
ing down to a recent date, Mr. J. E. Samuel gives a very interesting account
of the Chartist Riots in Montgomeryshire in 1889. Though this incident
can scarcely be said to belong to " Wales of the Past," the Editor, we
think, has acted judiciously in preserving this almost contemporary account
whilst it may be had. Mr. W. H. Green also supplies an article to shew
the identity of the :'John de Monmouth" who was hanged in 12S0. Mr.
J. Wilson Evans gives the boundary of the ancient Principalities of Wales,
and there are several other valuable Papers and Folk lore Notes and Super-
stitions which, for want of space, we are unable to refer to more particularly.
Western Antiquary. Note Book for Devon and Cornwall. Edited by
W. H. K. Wright, F.R. Hist. Soc, Borough Librarian, Plymouth, &c, &c.
Plymouth : W. H. Luke. London : George Redway. Exeter : James C.
Commin, 1889-90.
The Western Antiquary under the skilful management of Mr. Wright, with
the assistance of his numerous able contributors, pursues its useful course.
Notices of Recent ARrn.EOLO&icAL Publications. 395
Mr. W. Crossing's interesting Monograph on " Croken Tor and the
Stannary Parliament," commenced in Volume VIII. , is not yet completed,
and several other Papers, commenced in the last Volume, are continued and
completed in this, and several important new Papers have been begun. Mr.
Edward Windeatt introduces an interesting historical article on " Totnes
— its Mayors and Mayoralties," which is not yet completed. The Rev.
Sabine Baring-Gould and Mr. R. Twigg, F.S.A., contribute an " Armory of
the Western Counties," from an old manuscript in the libiary of the late Mr.
Northmore Lawrence, of Launceston, a gentleman who was well-known as
an able genealogist. This Manuscript, the contributors shew from internal
evidence, was written about 154S. The article will worthily occupy con-
siderable space in the periodical for some little time. A Paper entitled
" The Easton Family, and the Arms of the County of Devon," by " Gene-
alogist," is replied to by Mr. Charles Worthy, in which he takes exception
in a crushing reply to the genealogy set forth in the Paper, and gives a
counter descent, and " Genealogist " has, for the present, disappeared. The
Rev. Prebendary Hingeston- Randolph continues his " Kingsbridge Manu-
scripts," and there are many minor notes of much interest by the Rev.
Samuel Barber, the Rev. W. S. Lach-Szyrma, Dr. Brushfield, Dr. Drake,
and other well-known writers.
We have only to add that the illustrations, generally, have been greatly
improved.
NOTES AND GLEANINGS. A Monthly Magazine devoted chiefly to
subjects connected with the Counties of Devon and Cornwall. Edited by
W. Cotton, F.S.A. and James Dallas, F.L.S. Vol. II. Numbers 19-25.
Exeter : Printed by W. Pollard & Co., 1889.
In our last volume we noticed this serial as far as number 18 of Vol. II., and
we now take it up from number 19 to the end of that volume.
In the first of the numbers now before us, a very interesting descriptive
and illustrated notice is given of the " Early Greek Pottery " in the Albert
Memorial Museum at Exeter. Mr. Edward Ashworth gives a brief sketch
of an ancient House, which was situated just beyond the South Gate of the
City, known as " Larkbear House " from a family of that name, to whom it
belonged as early as the 14th century. The Larkbears appear to have be-
come extinct before the 15th century, and the house afterwards passed into
the possession of divers families in succession, and was altered, from time to
time, for the convenience of the occupants, but now it has been demolished
for building purposes. Externally, the house shewed some 18th century
work of good character, but on removing this, it was found that it incased
some fine old work of the lGth century, illustrations of which are furnished.
A very good account is contributed of the ancient Church of St. Pancras,
Rousdon, with a list of the institutions of the Rectors — 40 of them — includ-
ing an intruder during the interregnum of the 17th century. These institu-
tions commence in 1282 and continue to 1881, a period of 600 years. Mr.
C. J. Tait contributes a feeling artistic treatise on the painted Glass in the
Church of Doddiscomeleigh. The Abstracts of the Municipal Records
are continued, and biographical sketches are given of Exeter and Devon
Worthies.
I IN" ID IE zx:
Abbehale, de, 143, 358, 359, 360, 367, 368
Abbenhale, Bailiwick, 357,358, 359, 367
A.B.C. Book, The, noticed, 182
Abenhall, M., 16n
Abergavenny, Hon. of, 303, 310, 311
Abergavenny, Priory
^Ebred, Archb. of York, 238
Abrincis, de, 102
Absalom, 32, 35
Account (Sir J. Maclean) for Excavations
at Tockington Park, 216-219
Account, Treasurer's Annual, 220
Achebrok, 361
Acheley, 112
Acholt, M., 284
Achord, 144
Acombe, 63
Acton, 315, 318
Acton, de, 32, 34, 35, 276
Acton (Iron), 258, 260, 261, 265
Acton, river, 258
Adam, 57
Adam, son of Simon, 313
Adams, 1
Adel Ch., Leeds, Hagoday at, 132
Adelminton, 290
Adelsthorp, 246
Agatha, 306
Agg-Gardiner, at Cheltenham, 189 ; elec-
ted President, 193 ; his Inaugural
Address, 193-199 ; is thanked for ac-
cepting the office and for his Address,
200, acknowledges the same, 200 ;
presides at Evening Meeting, 204,
is thanked for his courtesy as Presi-
dent, 212 ; acknowledges the Vote,
ib., 214
Agnes, dau. of Roger, 45
Aids, 14
Ailward, 269
Ailward, Meaw, 269
Ailwin, 43n
Akeley, 364
Alan, Roger, son of, 302
Albamara, de, 299
Albemarle, 301
Albemarle, Duke of, 40n
Albini, de, 314, 315
Albright, 81, 81n
Albredus, Bp., 241
Alder, 67n
Alderfull, 61, 63
Alderley, 258
Aldred, Bp., 241
Aldewyke, 143, 153, 160
Aletangge, 359
Aletunes brok, 366
Aletune, 366
Alexander, King of Scots, 102
Alfred, K., 134
Algar, 50, 269
Algar, E. of Mercia, 102
Algaro, 269
Algiva, 269
Algrinton, see Allccrton
Alkerton, 147, 156
Aleston, 57, 68, 74, 96
Allen, 6
All Saints' Church, York, Hagoday at, 132
Almaricus, 268, 279
Vol. XIV. 2c
Almondesbury Ch., 125
Almondesbury, M., 129
Aluinebache, 365
Alured, 350
Alvescot, 43, 44
Alveston, 244, 261, 281, 298
Alveston, Warr., see Aleston
Alvington, M., 295
Alwinton, 262
Amandes, 227
Amberley, 296
Amenvill, de, 320
Amney, 226, 314
Amney Crucis, 311
Ampton, 234
Anderson, 105, 113
Andover, 69
Andrews, 161
Ankeleyeford, 361
Anna, w. of Prince Edw., 276
Anne, 98
Anne, St., 231
Annesley, 74, 74n ; fam. 75, 76, 77, SO, 94,
101, 104, 106, 112, 114, 116n
Anneys Wood, 333,
"Antiquary," The, noticed, 185
"Antiquary," The, Vol. XXL, noticed, 300
Antrelot, in Normandy, 26
Archer, 18, 201
Arilda, V. and M., 238, 240
Arms—
Anderson, 115
Annesley, 100, 114, 116
Arderberg, 91, 99
Arundel, 110, 297
Ashmead, 201
Atwell, 354
Badlesmere, 110
Banbury, 115
Barton, 116
Basinge, 114
Berwick, 91, 99
Bohun, 109
Booth, 100, 116
Boswell, 99
Boteler, 116
Braose, de, 109
Brocas, 100, 115
Bruce, 100, 114
Carter, 344
Caune, de, 115
Chandos, 100, 114
Chester, E. of, 116
Constable, 115
Cosnard, 115
Cotton, 100, 114
Crispin, 115
Crupes, 211
Cyveliok, Hugh, 115
David, E. of Huntingdon, 100, 115
Dexter, 115
Dighton, 72, 89, 94, 100, 115
Downing, 115
Edgar Athelin, 100, 115
Edmund, K., 100, 114
Edward Conf., 115
Egerton, 100, 116
Falconer, 114
Fitton, 116
Fitz Hamon, 115
398
INDEX.
Arms — Continued
Fitz Roger, 115
Folville, 100, 114
Footc, 99
Glanville, 91, 99
Greene, 91, 99
Hall, 91, 99
Hanbury, 100, 114
Hatton, 116
Harvey, 115
Hellesbv, 116
Hco, de, 115
Hugh Cweliok, 100
Keyte, 94, 115
Kingsley, 116
Kington, 238
Lions, 91
Lister, 94
Lupus, Hush, 115
Malcolm III., 100, 115
Marrowe, 93
Massey, 116
Meschines, de, 115
Mobcrley, 116
Mollins, 91, 99
Mountford, 110
Newmarch, de, 109
Normanville, 116
Morrell, 115
Partridge, 344
Peche, 114
Pratell, 91, 99
Puroell, 91, 99
Roche, 100, 115
Scocathe, 91,99
Sehnan, 94
Shershall, 91
Starton, 116
Stayley, 116
Thornton, 116
Thurcaston, 114
Tyndale, 116
Venables, 114, 116
Wakested, 91, 99
Waldesheaf, 114
Wessenham, 100, 114
Whitney, 116
Wylcotes, 91, 99
Wylcott, 99
Asaph, Bp. of, 125
Ashby-de-la-Zouch, 72
Ashe'hvorth, M., 129
Ashelworth, Ch., 125
Ashley, 19, 29Sn, 305
Ashley, Priors of, 20
Ashley, W. J., M.A., his " Introduction
to English Economic History and
Theory," noticed, 375
Ashton, Sir William, 113
Ashton, Cold, 281
Asne 1', 318
Aspennemere, 363
Aspenemerruede, 363
Aspunerede, 363
Asshe, Kafe de, Abbot, 128
Aston, de, 28
Astune, 361, 368
Athelstan, K., 269
Atkyns, 30, 339
Atteleyegrene, 359
Aubemarle, de, 16
Aure, de, 17
Aure, M., 17
Aust Cliff, 245
Auste, 247, 313
Austyerende, 262
Avance, 45
Aveling, 228
Avenel, de, 15, lBn
Avening, M., 5, 15n
AveningCh., report on, by Messrs. Car-
penter and Ingelow, 5-13
Aventye, 109
Averey, 233
Avon, riv., 231, 243, 247,249, 250, 260, 266,
277
Awnellis Cross, 367
Aubrey, 113
Aylberton, 263
Aylston, Co. Warr., 64, 70, 71
Aylworth, 336, 337, 338
Baalun, de, 303, 304, 309, 310, 311, 312
Babbage, Gen., 189
Babington, 104
Baderon, 17, 31S
Badger, 268
Badlesmere, 110, 111
Badminton, 266, 314
Baggindon, 23, 25
Baggindon, de, 23, 25
Bagley, 80
Bagnall-Oakeley, Mrs., her Paper on
"Sanctuary Knockers," 131-140, 211
Bagwell, Richard, M.A., his " Ireland un-
der the Tudors," noticed, 385
Baha, de, 313
Bailiwicks, in Forest of Dene, 15, 16, 356,
369
Bailliol, de, 309, 311
Bainham, 246
Bakemere Priory, 21
Baker, 333
Baladon, de, 310
Baloun, de, 143, 146, 147, 148
Bannebury, de
Barenden, 244
Barkier, le, 46
Barkly, Sir Henry, K. C. B., &c., his
" Testa de Nevill," Returns for Glouc. ,
14-47 ; app. Delegate to Archaeological
Congress, 191; his Remarks on "Liber
Niger," 285-320
Barksdale, 347
Barkswell, 92
Barndleysende, 365
Barnes, 66, 66n, 07, 67n, 68, 93, 94
" Barnstaple, and the Northern Part of
Devonshire during the Civil War," b3'
R. W. Cotton, noticed, 174-179
Barnstaple, Hon. of, 302, 307
Barnulph, K., 238
Baron, 143, 153, 160
Barow, 276
Barre, de la, 46
Barre, le, 284
Barres Court, 248
Barry, James, Abbot, 128
Bartieet, Rev. S. E., at Berkeley, 1, 189
Bartlett, 67n
Barton, de, 32, 35
Basinge, 101, 143, 157
Basset, 308
Bath. 231, 248, 260, 206, 281, 326
Bathford, 77, 107, 118
Baunse, 145
Bayeux, Ch. of, 40n
Bayly, 73, 108
Baynton, 1, 276
Bazeley, Rev. W., Hon. Sec. at Berkeley,
1 ; acts as Guide at Berkeley Castle-
3 ; 62, 63 ; at Cheltenham, 189 ; reads
Report of Council, 189-193 ; 190 ; pro-
INDEX.
399
jects publication Glouc. Bibliography,
192 ; 200 ; his remarks on the Manor
of Swindon, 201 ; 20(5, 20S ; on the
Roman Villa in Spoonley Wood, 208,
210 ; Guide at Chedworth, 215
Beauboys, 41
Beauchamp, 110, 111, 113, 23C, 265 ; ped.
of, 275, 2S9, 289n
Beaufort, 110
Beau lieu, Abbey, 31Cn
Beaumont, de, 102
Beaurepaire, 103
Bechenehull, 364
Becket, 307
Beckford, 6
Beckford, Priors of, 20
Bede, 267
Beddowe, 71
Beddoe, Dr., 1 ; elected President for
1890-1, 211
Bedford, Duchess of, 139
Bedfordshire, 76
Bedminstcr, 253
Belami, 57
Beligh, 103
Bell, 236, 243
Bells, Inscriptions on, 86
Bellows, .1., 190
Bereguall, de, 293
Berkeley, 3, 25, 31n, 34n, 19, 143n, 201,
229, 230, 217, 238, 240, 242, 243, 245,
256, 257, 259, 262, 263, 280, 2il,300, 301
Berkeley Castle, 117, 118, 119, 190, 230
Berkeley Church visited by Society, 1
Berkeley, of Dursley, 120, 121, 122, 123,
124, 230, 282, 283, 284, 291n, 292, 294,
29i\ 299n, 300, 301, 317
Berkelej*, Genealogy of, 263, 255
Berkeley harness, 125, 300
Berkeley, of Heron, 282
Berkeley, Hon. of, 317
Berkeley, Royer, of Durslev, his Knights,
299
Berkeley, Spring Meeting there, 1
Berkeley, Tombs in the Cathedral, 251
Berkshire, 40, 77, 225, 315, 316, 317
Berleysgrene, 365
Bermondsey, Priory of. 310
Bernard, the Priest, ."17
Berners, 335, 336
Bernulph, K., 241
Bers, (Berse) Bailiwick, 357, 362, 363, 36S
Berwick, St. James, Wilts, 89
Berwick-upon-Tweed, 222
Best, 78, 79
Bethlesden, Abb. of, 2S4
Betistre, Co. Hants., 281
Betun de, Bp., 283, 329, 334, 349n
Beverlev, 135
Beverstone Castle, 229, 230, 280
Benet, 159
Bikenor fields. 364
Bikenour Bailiwick, 357, 364, 368
Bikenoresti, 364
Bikenoure, 365, 366
Bikenoursford, 367
Bicknor, M., 15, 15n
Bicknorswey, 359
Billinge, 105
Bird, 354, 355
Bishop, 28, 28n
Bisley Hund., 21n, 37
Bisley, M., 298
Bissopeslade, 365
Bissopesweie, 361, 365
Bitton, 249
Blake, 227
•2c2
Blakemore, 361
Blakeney Bailiwick, For. of Dene, 15, 351,
358, 361, 368
Blakeney, de, 15
Blakenevc, 361
Blakeneye Mill, 361
Blakepulle, 361, 363
Blakepultorde, 361
Blacker, Rev. Beaver H., his " Glouces-
tershire Notes and Queries," noticed,
392
Blacker, Rev. B. II., 191
Blakeway, 190
Blaksennie, 3f9
Blanc, Le, 189 ; seconds vote of thanks,
200
Blechesden, 304
Blechesden, de, 17
Bletchingdon, 106
Blevth, 362
Bleyth, (Bley), Bailiwick, 357, S62, 36S
Blideslawe, Hund., 16
Blund, 17, 17n, 19, 256, 330, 312
Blunt, see Blund
Bodington, Alice, her " Studies on Evolu-
tion and Biology," noticed, 377
Bodinffion, M. visited, 204; 214 ; 230
Bodvill, de, 299
Bohun, de, 109, 110, 111, 2S4, 2S6n, 29S,
302
Bohun, Margaret, de, her Knights, 301,
303, 303n, 304, 306, 313, 315, 316, 319
Bokeland, 79
Boleville, de, 293
Boleyn, Anne, Q., 221
Bolletre, 366
Boniface, V., Pope, 133
Bonnor, lip., 346
Bonuor, B., 1, 1S9 ; proposes resolution,
193
Booth, 111, 112, 113
Bordeaux, 21, 22n
Borhunte, 10
Bosco, de, 294, 298
Bosell, Bp., 237, 241
Boswell, 69, 93, 98, 93
Bosworth Field, 230
hoteler, le, 143, 232, 233, 234, 235, 266
Botinton, 291, 296
Bouchier, 110
Bowdler, 106
Bowley, C, re-elected on Council, 192
Bow, Middlesex, 73, 74
Boxclive, de, 16
Box, de la, 362
Boxwell, 259
Bratenstoke Priory, 227
Bradewall, 97
Bradford, 260
Bradley, de 2S4
Bradley, Hants, 1C3
Bradley, Hund., 29, 35, 36, 37, SOS
Bradshaigh, 111
Bradstone, W., Abbot, 127, 255
Brackenridge, W. J., 1
Brandon Hill, 2)2
Braose, de, 28, 109, 284, 302
Brasses, Monumental, 89-95, 213, 213n,
343
Braunch, Abbot, 161
Brecon, 3ln
Brecknock, 109, 302
Brecknock Abbey, 304n
Brecknockshire, 244
Breme, le, 364
Bremerende, 363
400
INDEX.
Breth, Bret, &c, le, 37, 141, 142, 143 ; ped.
144 ; 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152,
153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160
Brewer, 74, 82, 83
Bricssard, Ranulph, 102
Brictric, son of Alnod, 5, 50, 51. 269, 278
Brid, 46
Briddessete, 359
Brierley, G. H , his " Cymru Fu," no-
ticed, 394
Brimpsfield, 30, 34n, 318
Brinton, de, 285n
Bristol, 155, 192 ; selected as place of
meeting next year, 211 ; 231, 243, 246,
247, 254, 258, 262, 279
Bristol, St. Augustine's Abbey, 19 ; Roll
of Abbots, 117n ; 119, 124 ; founda-
tion of, 125, 126, 250
Bristol, St. Augustine's Abbey, Abbot of,
20, 117
Bristol-upon-Avon, 18 ; Parish Churches —
St. Augustine's, 248, 252
The Gauntes, 249, 251, 252
Four Houses of Friars, 249, 252
The City Gates, 250, 252, 253, 255
St. John's Church, 250
The Castle, 250
The Bridge, 250, 251
St. Nicholas Church, 261
St. Leonard, 251
St. Lawrence, 251
St. John Baptist, 251
Christ's Church, alias Trinity, 251
St. Ewen, 251
St. Werburgh, 251
All Hallowes', 251, 254, 255
St. Mary Port, 251
St. Peter's, 251
St. Stephen's, 251, 254
St. Thomas, Apostle, 251
St. Sepulchre, 251
l^t. James Priory, 252, 279
Hospitals, 252
Chapels, 253
Bridges, 230, 253
Ferries, 253
The Harbour, 11
The Calendaries, 2
Beyond Avon.
Redcliff, 251, 252, 253
St. Mary Magd., 252
Bristol, Deans of, 113
Brithelmetona, de, 52
Britto, 75
Britwoldesbury, Hund., 23
Brocas, 103, 105
Brookampton, 331, 332, 333, 334, 338
Brockhampton, de, 289
Brockworth, 244
Brockyeborne, 98
Brodemede, 359
Brodokethume, 363
Brodokwey, 361
Brod\veve:-enese, 366
Broke, 98
Brokeworth, de, 143, 143n, 154, 157
Bromefield, 240
Bromeasse, 366
Bromespulle, 361
Bronstonesbrok, 367, 368
Brown, 32, 32n, 35n, 80, SOn
Bruce, 102
Bruern Abbey, 26
Bruggeman, 55
Brun, le, 29, 30, 31n, 34, 34n, 35, 35n
Bruton, H. W., 1 ; re-elected on Council,
192 ; Auditor, 220
Buckthorn Weston, Church Plate, 267
Buckingham, Duke of, 140, 261,*262
Buckland, M. , 56, 57 ; Church, 82n
Bucklebury, 77, 107
Buckler, J. C, 48, 49
Bucknall-Estcourt, 42
Bundy, 79
Burbyn, 347
Burk, de, 358
Burgh, de, 111
Burton, 223, 246
Burroughs, 1
Bush, 1
Busli, de, 50, 51
Busted, 347
Butevilayne, 284
Butler, Edward, his " Consideration of
Gentle Ways," noticed, 379
Butterworth, Rev. G., his " Notes on the
Apse of the Ancient Church of Deer-
hurst," 48-49
Cable, 97
Cadbury, de, 311
Cadbury, Som., 310, 311
Cadurcis, see Chaworth.
Caen, 279
Caerleon, 291 n
Caerwent, visit to, 211
Cahaignes, de, 294, 298
Cailey, see Kailey.
Cainsham Abbey j 255, 260, 266
Caines, 257
Cainho, 316n
Caisneio, de, 292
Calais, 221, 223
Caldewall, 367
Calewe, de, 330
Calicote, 284
Calewe, de, 143, 144, 154
Calmesden, 24
Camber, John, 341 ; his will, 342 ; his
Monumental Brass, 343, 354
Camberton, 64
Cambridge, Christ Church College, 221
Cambrensis, Gerald, 135
Campden,
Cannynge, 118
Cantelene, 299
Canterbury, Cathedral, 9
Canterbury, Archb. of, 347
Cantilupe, de, 18, 268, 350
Canute, 302
Canute, K., 23S, 241
Caprun, de, 294, 296
Car, 276
Cardiff, de, 293
Carectar, 58
Careter, le, 54
Carle, 97
Carlisle, 326n
Carpenter, Ingelow, Report on Avening
Church, 5, 13
Carter, 344
Cartwrig
Case, 96
Castell, 337
Castile and Leon, Pedro, K. of, 111
Castle Cary, 40, 311
Caune, de, 103
Castles in Gloucestershire, 247
Cawthery, 97
Ceolnoth, Archb., 347
Cernay, de, 302
Cerne, Abbot of, 306
Cerney, 24, 305
INDEX.
401
Cerney, John, Abbot, 129
Chacepore, 21
Chacombe, Oxon, 86
Chalfring, 364
Chamberlayne, 108
Chambers, 337, 347
Chandler, 333, 33", 343, 344, 346
Chandos, de, 23, 25, 36, 104, 282, 31S
Chanteries, 225
Chapmone brugge, 364
Chardi, de, 294
Charlecote, 108
Charles I., K., 70
Charlton Abbots, 338
Charlton Kings, 305
Chasegresok, 365
Chasnall, 95, 97
Chaunsey, 258, 2P4
Chaworth, 239, 243, 313, 314,315, 316, 316n
Chaxhale, 359
Chedworth, Koman Villa visited, 211, 214
Cheek, Sir John, 223
Cheisne, del, 309
Chelefield, de, 313, 315
Cheltenham, Abb., 276n
Cheltenham, Annual Meeting at, 189, 192,
193, 235, 242, 247, 267, 305, 320, 332,
338 ; Grammar School, 332
Cheltenham, Hund., 328
Cheltenham, Mayor of, 189
Chepstow, 357
Chepstow, Excursion to, 211 ; 244, 246
Cherington, M., 28
Cheswell, 80
Chester, Earls of, 37, 102
Chester, Hugh, E. of, 298
Chetel, 303
Cheverel, 314, 314n, 315
Chevringworth, de, 143, 151
Chewton Mendip, 75, 107
Chichester, 209
Chichester. Bp. of, 8, 287n, 306
Chipping, 192, 247, 298
Chipping .Norton, 25n, 246, 247
Chirchome, 358
Chirington, 284
Chiveleia, de, 289
Chulunces, de, 289
Church Plate, 86-89, 165-170
Churne, riv., 227, 248
Cirencester, 46, 192, 226, 227, 228, 230, ':31
235, 242, 247, 248
Cirencester Abbey, 227, 290
Cirencester, Abbey, Almoner of, 46
Cirencester, Abbots of, 20, 22, 47
Cirencester, Bailiwick of, 21
Cirencester, de, 29, 35, 45
Cirencester Hund., 15n, 23, 25, 26, 36, 37,
43n.
Cirencester, Hosp. of St. John, 228
Cirencester, St. Peter's par., 37
Clarence, D. of, 225
Clare, de, 110, 239, 242, 243, 265, 267, 270,
277, 279, 280, 282, 291n.
Claremont, de, 102
Clark, G. T., 3, 291n.
Clarkfield, 359
Clavil, de, 291
Cleeve, Bishops, 12
Cleeve Hdl Camp, visited by the Society,
205 ; described by Mr.G. B.Witts,, ib.
Cleeve, M., 319
Clegram, W. B., his death, 192
Clement, VII., Pope, 221
Clements, 347
Clericus, 32, 35
Clerk, le, 46, 331
Cleyesladesreode. 363
Cleyewavsendc, 363
Cliffe, 283
Clifford, Advow., 74-79 ; Institutions, 79-
83, 106, 108
Clifford, de, 143, 151, 154, 156, 159, 160,
201, 257, 319
Clifford, Hist, of Manor and Advow. of,
by Sir John Maclean, F.S.A., 50-116 ;
granted to the Abbey of St. Peter, 51,
extent of, 51-59, advowson of, 77,
the church, 83-95, bells, 86, monu-
ments, 89 ; church plate at, 88-89, 167
Clifton, 104, 276, 292, 296, 354
Clifton, Antiquarian Club.Proceedings of,
edited by Alfred E. Hudd, F.S.A.,
noticed, 183-184
Clinton, 292, 307, 308
Clipston, de, 353
Clive, 277
Cliveden, de, 293
Clopley, 332, 333
Clopton, 101
Cloudesley, Herbert, his " Passing
Thoughts of a Working Man," noticed,
379
Cloville, 104
Cnappestysenese, 365
Cnictecote, de, 306
Cobberley, 25, 201, 230, 299, 300
Cockerel, 29, 302. 304, 305, 309, 311, 312
Cocksutgrene, 362
Coderington, 257, 300
Codrington, M., 13u, 299, 313
Coelnoth, Archb., 337
Cogan, de, 294
Coke, William, Abbot, 128
Coksutewcye, 367
Cokwodesbroke, 362
Coldhall, 104
Cold Salperton, 358
Colecombe, 352
Coleforde, 364
Coles, 333
Colthrop, 141
Colstyerende, 361
Colvnes, 332, 254
Combe, 118, 147
Combe Keynes, chalice at, Must., 266
Combe, par., 69, 98
Combes, 67, 354
Compton, de, 143, 157
Compton, Abdale, 33S
Condicote, 15, 305
Connington, 102, 104, 105, 107
Constable, 105
Constantini, de, 294
Cook, Dr., proposes resolution, 193
Cooke, 63, 64, 65, 86, 189
Copland, 354
Cormailles, de, 30, 32, 35, 207, 318
Connailles, Hon., 35
Cornewall, 104
Cornwall, 209
Corwedene, 233
Coryeldestone. 367
Cotes, de, 29, 46
Cotes Manor, 26, 29, 311
Cotes, par., 26, 29
Cotteswold Hills, 228, 230, 233, 233, 244
246, 24S, 342
Cotton, 76, 8o, 101, 104, 107, 114, 223
Cotton, R.W., his "Barnstaple and the
Northern Part of Devonshire during
the Civil War," noticed, 174-179
Cotton, William, F.S.A., his " Notes and
Gleanings," noticed, 395
402
INDEX.
Cottonian Library, Hed. Trustees of, 106,
107
Coutances, Bp. of, 40n, 308
Coutances, de, 296
Courteen, 104
Courtenay, 275, 276
Coveleve, de, 299, 358
Coventry, 73, 108
Cowley, de, 301
Cox well-Rogers, Rev. W. It., 211-212
Cradockstone, 361
Cranburne, 269, 278
Craven, 334
Crawley-Boevey, 303n
Crekelade, 225, 317
Cripps, 88
Croc, 293
Crofterend, 262
Croke, 103
Crokedeford, 364
Crome, 31, 31n, 34n.
Crompton, 332
Cromwell Thomas, 222
Crophill, 102
Crowland Abbey, 137
Croyndon, de, 353
Croysedereode, 365
Crudas, 189
Crumpemede, 258, 363
Crupes, 210, 211, 333
Cumberland, Popular County History of,
by Chancellor H. S. Ferguson, M.A.,
LL.M. F.S.A., noticed, 179,182
Cumdicot, 302
Cunnesbroke, 363
" Cymru Fu," edited by Geo. H. Brierley,
noticed, 394
Cyveliok, Hugh, 102
Dadyngton, Hew de, Abb., 127
Dagiingworth, 291
Dallas, James, F.L.S., his "Notes and
Gleanings," noticed, 395
Dansey, 1
Danvers, 98
Dapifer, 109
D' Argent, E. A., 1,189
David, Abbot, 127
David I., King of Scots, 102
Davis, 92, 93n, 186, 189, 213n.
Davy, 355
Davys, 336, 348
Dawboney, John, Abbot, 129
Day, Dr., 189 ; his death, 192
Day, Rev. J. G., 211
Deerhurst, Notes on the Apse of the
Ancient Church, by the Rev. G. But-
terworth, 48-49 ; 266, 267, 268
Deerhurst, Prior of, 20
De la Bere, 284
Delamere, Lord, 107, 112, 113, 260
Delean, 234
Delisle, 208, 217
Delves, 276
Denbigh, 65
Dene, de, 16, 27, 42
Dene, Forest of, 14 ; officers of, 14n, 15,
16 ; 17, 38, 209, 243, 245, 246, 259, 302,
303n ; Perambulation of 10th Edw.I.,
by Sir John Maclean, 356-309 ; Baili-
wicks of, 357, 359, 366, 369 ; Mines of,
368, 369
Dene Magna, 16, IGn ; Bailiwick, 357, 358,
366, 367
Dene Parva, Bailiwick, 357, 359, S67
Denmark, K. of, 119, 120, 124
Dent, Mrs., 208 ; is thanked, 210, 211
Denys, 257, 200
Denys, St., Mon., 267
Depeforde, 361
Depemore, 362
Derbyshire, 289
Derham, 1
Derham, de, 310, 311
Derkesforde, 366
Derneford, de, 358
Despenser, 22n 27, 31n, 61, 273, 274, 307,
308, 309
Devereux, 332
Devises, 6,324
Devonshire, 16, 291n ; sheriff of, 297
Dexter, 105
Diarmed, K., 138
Dichesdon, (Sec Dixton, Mon., 2S9)
Dicton, de, 292
Did brook, 231
Didcote, 278
Dighton, 70,71 ; family, 72-73 ; 75, 70, 81,
82, 82n, 94, 96, 98, 107, 108
Dixton, Mon., 289
Dobell, Mr. and Mrs., receive the Society
at Whittington Court, 210
Dobell, Mr., 189; seconds resol., 193
Dobson, 347
Documents, Original, 95-97
DodiiiL'ton, 230,' 258, 259, 296, 300
Dodwell, 333, 333
Dol, Archb. of, 350n.
Domesday Book, extracts from, 50, 51, 328
Domesday Survey, 357
Dorchester, Oxon, 228
Dorset, Church Plate in, 265 ; local
stamps, 168
Dorset, Co. of, 5, 40, 291n, 306
Dove, 104
Dover, Ch., 9
Dowdeswell, Ch. visited, 212 ; Paper by
Mr. S. H. Gael, thereon read, iu.; the
camp visited, 213
Downampney, 220
Downing, 105
Draycot, 101
Draycott, de, 358
Dru, 145
Druybrok, 363, 304, 365, 367
Druybrokesforde, 367
Druybrokeswall, 365
Dryden, Sir Henry, Bart., 7
Duddelegh, mead., 284
Dun, de, 353
Duncepouche, 124
Dunel, 45
Dunethrope, de, 2S9, 2S9n.
Dunham Massev, 111, 113
Dunstaple, 103, 105
Duutesborne, 31, 32, 34
Duntisbourne, Lire, 32, 34
Duntsborn, 46
Durand, the Sheriff, 303, 305, 319, S28
Durham, Bps. of, 227
Durham Cathedral, Hagodav at, 132, 13
204
Dursley, 80, 120, 191, 230, 259, 300, 325
Durslev, Barony, 300, 301
Dutton,333
Dychesende, 359
Dyrham, 29, 257, 260, 311
Kastleche, 23, 25, 224, 295, 304
Eastington, par., 147n, 311, 312
Eastwick, Hants, 69
Eastwood Park, 112
INDEX.
403
Eaton, Hastings, Barony, 29, 36, 297
Eaton, Berks, 297
Edburge, 241
Edgar Athelin, 102
Edgar, K., 134
Edric, E. of Mercia, 102
Edmond (the Elder), K. , 266
Edmondesburv, St., 135
Edward, the Outlaw, 102
Edward (the Elder), 269
Edward Confessor, K., 51, 134, 227, 278,
290, 307, 319, 328
Edward I., K.,118, 142, 146, 154, 158
Edward II. K., 119, 238, 239, 240, 241
Edward II. (Ironside), 102, 244
Edward III. K., Ill, 118, 142, 258, 280
Edward IV. K., 139, 234, 235, 242 205, 267,
280
Edward VI. King-, 88
Edward of Lancaster, 275
Edward, Prince, 44
Egbert, K., 238, 241
Egerton, 74, 113
Edy, 366
Eilburge, Q., Abbess, 237
Eiusford, de, 292
Eldon, Lord, is thanked, 211, 214
Eldred, 238
Elizabeth, Q., SI, 88, 223
Elkstone, 6, 7, 32, 34, 35, 192
Elkyns, 354
Ellacombe, 86, 345n.
Ellerton, 347
Ellis, A. S., 51
Elsicot, M., Oxon,
Elthestan, 269
Elton, 43, 354
Ehin, C. N..his "Dictionary of Herald-
ry," noticed, 184
Elvot, 117
Engewald, 124
Erkenband, 14, 15
Erleyeford, 361
Ernald, the Priest, 440
Erwyn, 103
Eskelin, 292
Esselegh, 284, 302
Essex, Co., 40
Estcourt, 41, 41n, 42 (See also Bucknall-
Extcourt)
Estenhall, 230
Eston, 318
Eston, de, 318
Estwood, 262
Ethelbald, K., 268
Ethelfleda, 244
Ethelred, K., 237, 241, 244, 268, 269
Eu, Earl of, 312
Eva, Q , Abbess, 237, 241
Evans, Mrs., 211
Evereux. de, 25, 102, 270
Evesham, 231, 234, 235, 289n.
Eveley, de. 124
Ewer, 69, 99
Exeter, Archd. of, 350
Exeter, Bps. of, 125
Exton, 102
Eylestone, de, 53, 59
Eyr, le, 333, 354
Eyton, Rev., R.W., 285n.
Eywode, 360
Fairford, 192, 225, 236, 22S, 247, 295
Fairford Water, 226
Falconer, 101
Falkirk, battle of, 103
Fallow, 87, 267
Fareham, 103
Faringdon, de, 292
Farington, 224, 22S
Farley, Abb., 239, 241
Farmer, 347
Farmiugton, 36, 297
Faune, 81
Fayre, lo, 124
Federer, Charles, A.L.C.P., his Yorkshire
Chap Cooks, noticeil, 185-188
Felda, de, 141
Felding, 276
Felton, 282
Ferguson, Chancellor R.S., his "Popular
History of Cumberland," noticed, 179-
182
Ferrars, 230
Fienles, 109
Fifhide, M., Dors., 129
Fineecherede, 363
Fineeth, 361
Fineethway, 361
Fisher, 113, 192, 326
Fitz Alan, 314, 315, 318
Fitz Baderon, 319
Fitz Count, 311
Fitz Gilbert, de, 293
Fitz Hamon, Robt., 102, 254, 269, 270,
278, 291n, 292, 295, 317, 350n
Fitzharding, 117, 118, 120, 121, 122, 123,
124, 125, 251, 254, 255, 282, 293, 300, 301
317, 350n
Fitzharding, Lord, 317
Fitz Harding', Robert, his Knights, 317
Fitz Herbert, 293, 302, 303n.
Fitz Milo, Roger, 243
Fitz Nichol, 282
Fitz Piers, 109
Fitz Roger, 103, 303, 305
Fitz Rolf, 311, 313, 319
Fitz Simon, 313, 315
Fitz Turold, 26, 29
Fitz Warine, 204, 298
Fitz Williams, 104
Flaald, 314
Flaxley Abbey, 243, 244, 246, 362
Flaxley, Abbot of, 258, 261
Fleming, le, 25
Fleury, 208
Flitenewyke, 365
Flore, 276
Foliot, 294, 319, 330
Folvylle, 104, 105, 116
Foote, 99
Forbes, Col., 189, 191
Forde, de, 57, 58, 59
Fordhampton, 276n.
Forster, 106
Fort Ancient, The Great pre-historic
Earthwork of Warren County, Ohio, by
Warren, K. Moorhead, noticed, 373
Fort St. George, E. I., 75
Fortescue, 276
Forthington, de, 329
Fosbrook, 201
Fossway, 230, 231, 248
Foster, 1
Fotheringay, 267
Foulds, 108
Fountains, Abbot of, 21
Fowler, 335
Foxe, 347
Foye, 239, 243
France, 221, 330
Franchevalier, 314, 315, 318
Frankeleyn, 58
404
INDEX.
Fraunceys, 355
Freeman, 52, 59, 67n, 78, 338
Frenche, le, 333
Frethorne, 311, 312
Frethorne, de, 312
Freville, de, 30n, 33n.
Frilsham, 77
Fringford, 332
Frocester, 7Sn., 80, 243
Frocester, Abb., 142, 239, 240
Froggewall, 364
Frogmore, 108
Frome Church, 334, 449
Frome, riv., 250, 258
Fromylode, de, 146
Frothorne, 309
Froulinton, 289, 290
Fuller, 334
Furnsham, de, 293
Fynes, 98
Gael, S.H., (the late) his Paper on Southam
House, read by Mr. le Blanc, 205 ; is
thanked, ib.
Galehampton, 309, 311
Galiena, 24
Gamage, 152, 239, 242, 284, 358
Garden, the, 32
Gardiner, W., 161, 342
Gardiner, R., 242
Gardinis, de, 29, 31, 32, 33, 33n, 34, 143,
158, 160
Gardinuni, 29, 31, 32, 34, 35n.
Gascony, 19, 21, 22n.
Gascony, Scutage of, 21, 23
Garsington, 43
Gaunt, 252, 253, 280
Gaunt's Hosp., 249, 252
Geneville, de, 37,111
"Gentleman's Mag. Library, Biographical
Notes," by A. C. Buckley, noticed, 172-174
"Gentle Ways," a consideration of, by
Edward Butler, noticed, 379
Geoffrey the Chamberlain, 307 (See
Clinton)
Geoffrey, Dean of Hereford, 52
Geoffrey, son of Roger, 309
George, 66, 189
Gerard, 299
Gerbodus, 294
Gernons, Randulf, 102
Gersdon Hund. (See Cirencester Ilund.)
Gert, 43n.
Geyton, de, 353
Gibbons, Mr. and Mrs., receive the Society
at Boddington Manor, 204, 211
Gibbs. 1
Gifford, 3, 30, 30n, 31n, 33, 34n, 36, 42, 23S,
241, 318
Gilbert, 257
"Glimpses into Nature's Secrets," by E.
Martin, noticed, 378
Glamorgan, Hon. of, 291n.
Glastonbury, 266
Glastonbury, Abb., 266
" Gloucestershire Notes and Queries,"
edited by the Rev. Beaver H. Blacker,
noticed, 392
Gloucestershire, 5, 16, 18, 19, 19n, 21, 39,
40, 40n,42, 45, 50, 65, 66, 70, 74, 75, 143,
192; projected publication of Biblio-
graphy of, 192; 224, 225, 230, 235, 236,
242, 243, 245, 246, 247, 262, 284n, 289,
291, 291n, 294, 304, 308, 810, 311, 312,
313, 314, 318, 319, 329, 338, 351n, 357
Gloucestershire, Sheriffs of, 35n, 158
Gloucester, Honour of, 29, 36, 40, 269 ;
devolution of, 270, 294, 295, 296n, 297,
298, 304
Gloucester, City, 78, 193, 209, 230, 283,
330, 334, 368
Gloucester, Mayor and Corp. of, 211
Gloucester, projected publication of
Records, 192
Gloucester and Religious Houses of
St. Peter's Abbey, 15, 62, 77, 141, 142,
23S, 259, 290, 305, 310, 362, 365
Gloucester, St. Peter's, Abbots of, 30, 32,
35, 60, 63, 142, 239, 365, 366
Gloucester, St. Peter's, Abbot and Con-
vent of, 51, 67, 142, 151, 152, 153, 154,
156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 238
Gloucester, Cathedral, 224, 237, 238 239
240, 242
Gloucester, Bishops, of, 162
Gloucester, Deans of, 162, 190
Gloucester, St. Oswald's Priory, 236,242
Gloucester, St. Nicholas, Hagoday at 131
204
Gloucester, St. Bartholomew, Hosp 237
242 '
Gloucester, Black Friars, Coll., 237, 242
Gloucester, St. Ewen's Church, 237, 242
Gloucester, Grey Friars, College, 237 ''42
243
Gloucester, St. Margaret's Coll., 237, 242
Gloucester, St. Mary Magd. Hospital, 237
242
Gloucester, Duke of (Rich. III.), 139
Gloucester, White Friars, Coll , 237, 242
Gloucester, Earls of, 23, 26, 2.50, 267 '?68
277, 278, 279, 290, 291, 291n, 292, 296!
298, 319
Gloucester, William Earl of, his Knisrhts
291, 294
Gloucester, de, 26, 109, 146, 295, 334
Goderich Castle, Honour of 290, 291n.
Godrike, 281
Godwin, 96
Goldcliffe, Priory, 267
Gomme, G. Lawrence, his " Gentlemen's
Magazine Library, — Bibliographical
Notes," noticed, 172-174
Gonovill, 294
Goodall, 82
Goodier, 68, 69, 93, 98
Goodman, 235, 242
Gornay, de, 292, 296
Gosynton, de, 124
Gotherington, 313
Gouthland, co. York, 89
Gower, 276
Gozenboded, 101
Grainvill, de, 294
Grandison, 111
Grava, de, 18
Graves, 74
Graville, 281
Gray, de, Archbp. 20, 20n.
Greklad, 248
Grenemare, de, 293
Grenewaye, 364
Grevil, 78
Grey, 113
Gryme, 112
Grove, 332
Grumboldsash Hund., 28
Guelde, atte, 149, 151
Guiz, de, 292
Gunlion, 293
Gunnilda, 45
Gunnoville, de, 294, 297,297n,298, 298, 309,
310, 312
INDEX.
405
Hackett, de, 358
Hailes, 296, 308
Hainault, 111
Hakesbury, M., 284
Hale, Genl., 1
Hales, 113,332,337
Hales, de, 354
Hall, Rev. J. M., at Berkeley, 1 ; his
Notes on Pynchenecumbe, 141-162 ;
210, 211, 305n ; his Memoir on Seven-
hampton, 328-355 ; the Benefice, 334 ;
Parsonage House, 337 ; Population,
338-339 ; Church, 339 ; Monuments,
343 ; Ch. Bells, 345 ; Mural Paintings,
345 ; Incumbents, 346-347
Hallen, Rev.A. W.Cornelius, his " London
City Church Registers, St. Botolph,"
noticed, 300 ; his " Scottish Anti-
quary," noticed, 394
Halliwell-Phillipps, J. O., his death, 192
Hameline, Abb., 52
Hamilton, Hans Claude, his " Calendar of
State Papers, Ireland," noticed, 380
Hamilton, W. D., his " Calendar of State
Papers (Domestic series)," noticed,
371
Hamo, son of Geoffrey, 297
Hampshire, 23, 24, 40, 76 ; Sheriff of, 297 ;
303
Hampton, de, 29
Hampton, in Gersdon, 36
Hampton Maisey, 36n, 299, 298
Hampton Ridware, 89
Hamtonford, de, 293
Hanbury, 76, 107
Handeley, 276
Hanewere, 365
Hangerby, 365
Hanbam, 248
Hanley, 347
Hanley, Abbot, 239, 241
Hanley Castle, 277, 278
Hara de, 318
Hardinge, 124, 254, 255
Hardreshall, 102
Harescombe, 141, 145, 303, 305, 328
Harewell, 108, 362, 366
Harevvood, 360
Harswell, 73
Harte, 69
Hartlebury, 240, 243
Hartshorne, A., 210, 211
Harvey, 104
Haseldene, 283
Hasele, de, 123, 124
Haseleye, Little, 367
Haseley, Rectory, Oxon, 223
Hasfield, 313, 319
Hastings, 26, 294, 297
Hastings, de, 29, 36, 284
Hastings, Eaton.— See Baton Hastings
Hatherop, M., 314
Hathewy, 368
Hattare, le, 355
Hatton, 332
Havarde, 276
Hawkins, 332
Hawle, 139
Hawtrey, 113
Hay, 359
Hay, of Hereford, The, 18
Hayles, Abbey, 231, 234, 240, 247
Hayermede, 361
Hearne, Tho., 224
Herbert, 347
Hela, de. 289
Helme, de, 358
Hemming, Rev. B. P., receives the Society
at Postlip Chapel, 201, 202, 214
Hempsted 338
Henbury, M., 319
Henefield, atte, 145
Henry I., K., 228, 278, 29S, 302
Henry II., Emp., 102, 251, 254, 285, 2S8n.
Henry II., K., 350n.
Henry III., K., 20, 21, 22, 22n, 23, 118, 141,
237, 242, 255, 288n.
Henry V., K., 232, 234
Henry VI , K., 232, 234
Henry VII., K ,235
Henry VIII., K., 221, 222, 243
Henry, son of Fabri, 53, 59
Henryes, 355
Hemstall, Ridware, 101, 104
Hentelove, 53
Heraldry, Dictionary of, by C. L. Elvin,
M.A., noticed, 184
Herbert, 107, 113
Hereford, Bps. of, 268, 277, 283, 284, 318,
319, 328, 328n, 329, 331, 332, 334, 335.
337, 348, 349, 350, 351, 351n.
Hereford, Castle, 331
Hereford, City, 245, 246
Hereford, Convent, 349
Hereford, Co., 76, 291n, 304, 311, 320, 357
Hereford, Ch. of, 328, 335
Hereford, de, 302, 303, 304, 304n, 305
Hereford, Dean and Precentor of, 3J5.338,
349, 354
Hereford, Deans of, 52, 352
Hereford, Earls of, 26, 27, 243, 244, 283,
303, 305, 311
Hereford, Hon. of, 144n.
Hereford, Little, 26
Herevard, 284
Herkebaud, 46
Herlowin, 293
Hertford, 261
Hesding, de, 314
Hestbacheswey, 365
Hewelsfield, 357
Hexham, 135
Heyeweye, 362
Hiatt, 259
Hidcote, Bartham, 73, 108
Highworth Church, Wilts, 214
Hildesley, 311
Hill, or Hulle, 282
Hinchwike, 246
Hinckesman, 337, 338
Hind, 152
Hintone, M., 56, 57, 61
Hocton, de, 293
Hodenakesputte, 365
Hodenales wood, 363
Hoel Dha, 136, 137
Holdsworth, 347
Holebrok, 36 a
Holecumbe, 147, 153, 299
Holeway, 361
Holewaysude, 362
Holines, 364
Holland, 109, 110, 111
Holme, 267, 277, 278
Holme Castle, 267, 277
Holmerstowe, 368
Holtleye, 151, 152, 159
Holton, 83
Holwardines Cross, 366
Holyene, 363
Holyrood, Edinburgh, Hagoday at, 140
Honyburn, Cow, 290
Hook, 347
Hooper, 67n.
406
INDEX.
Hope, 87, 88, 267, 190, 360
Hopestiesford, 367
Hopewy, 362
Horewalle, 363, 364
Horfield, Ch., 125, 130
Home, 225
Horse Bridge, 246
Horsley, Priors of, 20
Horton, Abbot, 239, 241
Horwood, 249
Hosington, 24
House, 333
Hudd, A. E., F. S. A., the Proceedings of
the Clifton Antiquarian Club, edited
by him, noticed, 183, 184 ; at Chelten-
ham, 189 ; re-elected on Council, 192-3
Hudleston, 235, 242
Hugh Magnus, 102, 269
Hugh, parvus, 301, 304, 306
Hugh, son of Lawrence, 54
Hughes, 1, 347
Hulke, 359
Humphrey, son of William, 306
Hungerford, 226
Hunt, 80n, 97
Hunt, William, Abbot, 130
Hunteforde, 249
Huntley, 324
Hunter, 75, 10S
Huntingdon, Archd. of, 352
Huntingdon, Henry E. of, 109
Huntsham, 357, 359
Huskarle, 101
Hussey, 256
Hyde, 334
Hyett, F. A., Projects Publication of a
Bibliographical, Gloucestershire, 192 ;
Auditor, 220 ; his Astrolabe, 321
Iffley, 6
Illger, 52
Ina, K. of Wessex, 134
Ingram, Dr., 78, 213
In Memoriam, Harry Mengden Scarth,163 ;
William Henry Paine, M. D., 370
Inscriptions, Monumental, 89-95 214, 226,
232, 243, 244, 291
Inscriptions, Roman, 3
" Introduction to English Economic Hist.
and Theory," by W. J. Ashley, noticed
375
Inventory of Farm Implements, 02
Ireland, 244
" Ireland under the Tudors," by Richard
Bagwell, M.A., 3 volumes ; Vol. III.
385
Isabella, sister of K. Henry III., 23
Isis, riv., 224, 225, 226, 23U, 248
Ivy Castle, 232
Iwelege, see Uley
Jackson, 96
James, I., K., 81
Jeayes, J. H., communicates "Roll of the
Abbots of S. Augustines, Bristol," 117-
130
Jeff, 191
Jeffereis, 118
Jelesdona, de, 292
Jenner, Dr., 3
Joanne, St., 283
John, Abbot, 127
John, K , 18, 22n, 28, 30, 141, 142, 277, 303,
303n
John, son 'of William, 57
John's, St., Bridge, 224, 225, 226
Jolyff, 79, 80
Jones, 106
Joseph, 46
Joseph, Abbot, 127
Judge, F., 1S2
Justice, 355
Kaderichesok, 364
Kalmundesdon, see Calmesden
Kainsham. see Cainsham
Kaily, 29, 30, 30n, 31, 33, 34n
Kay, Sir Brook, at Cheltenham, 189; pro-
poses a vote of thanks to the President,
200; thanks Mr. Vassar-Smith, and Mr.
Agg-Gardiner, 212 ; gives toasts, 214
Kaynes, de. 25. 26, 27, 28
Kederekesoc, 366
Kemble, 248, 312
Kempsford, M., 314, 315
Kenebelle, de, 310
Kenelin, St., K., 232, 233
Kenesleye, 358
Keneseye, 350
Kenred, 268
Kensdale, 246
Kensham, 64, 99
Kent, Church Plate of, Part II., by Rev.
W.A.Scott Robertson, «o(tc<;d,391-392
Kent, co., 290, 291n
Kenulph, K., 232, 233, 268
Keyerikesok, 366
Keyt, 73, 94, 108
Kidderminster, Abbot, 232
Kilpeck, 26
Kimbis, de, 293
Kineburge, Abbess, 237, 241
Kingesok, 364
Kingesperche, 364
Kingsholme, de, 18
Kingston, 80n, 98, 283, 325'
King's rode, 248
Kingston Russell, Dorset, 306
Kingswood, 249
Kingswood Abbey, 249, 256, 258, 261, 279,
283, 300, 301
King-ton, 53, 59, 61
Kinsell, 103
Knappe, 118
Knappestyesforde, 3f6
Knappestyesenese, 366
Knightlev, 104
Knightwike, Wore, 61, 63
Knowle, 223
Knull, Edm. de, Abbot, 128
Knyghton, 331
Knyte, le, 145, 159
Koctere Cross, 366
Kokschtesfelde, 367
Konhop, 358
Kylpeck, de 18, 37
Kyngcot, 79
Kynmerton, Ch., 36
Lacu, de, 366
Lacu, see Lea Ba'dley.
Lacy, de, 16, 25, 37, 238, 239, 240, 318, 331
Lagabit, 292
Lake, Serjeanty of, 16— See also Lea
Bailley.
Landea, meaning of, 358n
Landomar, 293
Langley, 37, 225
Langtree, Hund., 24n, 28, 37, 143
Lankford, Ch., 7
Lanthony, Prior of, 20, 31, 33n, 332, 231,
335, 349, 349n
IXDEX.
407
Lanthony Priorv, 143n, 203, 237, 244, 245,
304, 329, 334, 335, 346, 349, 360, 351,
352, 353, 354
Lasey, 16, 17
Lasseborough, 36, 27
Lasseborough, de, 26, 27
Lasteles, 55
Latimer, John, his " Leland's Itinerary
in Gloucestershire," 221-284
Latinelad, 248
Lattar, de, 45
Laud, Archb., 84
Laverstock, 43n
Lavington, de, 318
Laweore, 369
Lawrence, 210, 211, 332, 333, 334, 347
Lawson, 222
Laycock, Wilts, 12
Lea Bailley, (Lacu), Bailiwick, 16, 357, 366,
367, 369
Lea, The, Herts., 69, 99
Leckhampton, 44, 45, 308, 320
Leche, de, 23
Lechlade, 225, 226
Leckhampton, 7
Lecumbe, 281
Ledbury, 230
Leche Cecilia, see Eastleche.
Lega, de, 32, 34
Leicester, Earls of, 316
Leigh, VV., 189; proposes resolution, 193
Leigh, Som., M., 129, 130
"Leland's Itinerary of Gloucestershiie,"
by John Latimer, 221-284
Lemington, 281
Le'Petit, 304
Lesquier, 42
Lethieullier, 334
Leukenor, 276
Lewisham, 334
Leuric, 308
Leyland, 266
"Liber Niger," Remarks on by Sir Henry
Barkly, K.C.B., K.U.M.G.,&c.,2t:5-320
Lidne.\e, 366, 369
Lightbourne, 334
Lincoln, 121
Lincoln, Bishops of, 244
Lincoln, de, 3u6, 314, 315
Lincolnshire, 21, 208
Lindesey, 244
Lipiate, 281
Lirmonth, 276
Lisle. 359
Little Marcle, 76, 107
Livett, 28n
Llandaff, 125
Llanhandeney, 244
Lloyd, 1
Lockhead, 189
Loddelowe, de, 353
Lodebrok, 365
Lodebrokesreode, 365
Loes, St., 260
Loggan, 97
Lokington, de, 301
London, 222, 228, 234, 317, 339
" London City Churches, St. Botoloph,"
by A. W. Cornelius Hallen, M.A„
noticed, 390
London, de, 292
London, Tower of. 72, 99
London, Old, St. Paul's, Gleanings from,
by Dr. W. Sparrow Simpson, noticed,
170-172
Long, Win., Abbot, 127
Longford, de, 159, 337
Longchamp, 284
Longerende, 363, 367
Longetot, de, 358
Longmede, 3S9
Long stone, 365
Longtree, Hund.,see Langtree
Lontedone, 249
Lorha Abbey, 138
Lorraine, lip. of, 328 32Sn
Louis, King of Prance, 21
Loughborough, 73, 298
Louth, Prior of, 21
Lovel, 283, 309, 311
Lovetot, 102
Luce Cross, 36S
Lucius, K., 133
Lucy, 105, 108
Ludlow, 240
Luke, 293
Lupus, E. of Chester, 102
Lypiatt, M., 144, 144n
Lyplofe, 354
Machunswall, 363
Maclean, Sir John, 8n, 15n, 16n ; his
" History of the Manor and Advow-
son of Clifford, 60 ; b6 ; his Remarks
on Ancient Church Plate at Clifford,
87-^9 ; 117 ; appointed Delegate to the
Archaeological Congress, 191 ; Excava-
tion of Roman Villa at Tockington
Park, 192 ; his Account for Excava-
tions of Roman Villa at Tockington
Park, 216-219 ; 296n, 30Un ; his " Per-
ambulation of the Forest of Dene, 10
Ed. I.," 356-369
Madington, Wilts., 39
Maisey, de, 36, 292, 296
Maitland, 16n
Jlakerel, 276
Magason, 267
Malcolm Canmore, K., 75, 102
Malemvilier, de, 3t9, 312
Malmesbury, Richard, de, 127
Malmsbury, 229, 231
Malton, de, 353
Maltravers, 31 n, 34n
Malverne, 267
Maminot, 28, 2S9n
Mandeville, de, 109, 270, 279, 2C4
Mangotsrield, 256
Mansel, 44, 309, 312
Mapele, la, 148, 148n
Mara, de, 24, 26, 284, 291, 295, 358
Marche, de la, -/0
Marche, see Mercia,.
Marci, de, 293
Mare, de la, 18, 42, 42n, 44
iVlareford, 329, 367
Marescallus, 54
Margaret, y., 276
Marina, John, de, 127
Marisco, de, 309
Mariscoe, Salso, de, 294, see Saltmavsh
Market Towns in Gloucestershire, 247
Marlborough, 224
Marlebrugge, 367
Marlewall, 367
Marleway, 364
Marlwood Park, 112, 262
Marrowe, 63, 92, 92n, 93, 99
Marry s, de, 16n, el. Sin, 82
Marsliall, 95, i70, 290, 291, 2'Jln
Marshtield, 260, 279
40S
INDEX.
Martel, 29, 143
Martin, 82, 106
Martin, Edward, his " Glimpses into Na-
ture's Secrets," noticed, 378
Martin, R. T., re-elected on Council, 192
Martines Coksute, 365
Mason, 74, 82, 332
Massey, 111
Ma-svndon, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151,
152, 153, 154, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160
Mastcl, 157
Masters, 347
Matherne, visit to, 211
Mathew, 323
Matilda, Q., 50, 51, 269, 278
Matilda, the Empress, 65, 120, 121, 286,
303, 3(i3n
Matthews, 1
Maude, d. of Henry II., 285, 285n
Mauger, 58
Maungeant. 238, 241
Maunsel, 142, 144, 144n, 352, 358
Mauretania, de, 40
Maydcnstone, de, 330
Maylesoot, 365
Mayo, Rev. Charles Herbert, his " Somer-
set and Dorset Notes and Queries,"
noticed, 393
Mediamnis, Isle of, 245
Melun, Bp., 350, 350n
Merbroc, 359, 361, 362
Merchant, the 46, 46
Mercia, Kings of, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241,
268
Merinerudinge broke 362
Meroky, 363
Merruede, 367
Mersiche, 359
Merstowe, 360, 367
Mersty, 361, 363, 365, 366, 367
Meschines, de, 102
Meyrick, 332
Michael, 299
Michel Tewe, Wore, 63
Mickleton, 73
Micklethwaite, 89
Middlesex, Co., 73, 74, 319
Middleton, 57
Middleton, Prof. J. H., 200 ; read a Paper
comparing Roman Domestic Archi-
tecture in Rome, with similar Archi-
tecture in this country, 205 ; 206 ; his
Address on the Roman Villa, Spoonley
wood. 209, 210, 211 ; his remarks on
Withington Church, 213-214 ; on
Chedworth Roman Villa, ib.; 215
Milcote, 78, 281
Miller, 334
Mills, 189
Milo Fitz Walter, Earl of Hereford, 244
283, 302, 305, 311, 329, 334, 348
Minchinhampton, 230, 296n
Mineriis, de, 302, 306, 319
Mireford, 283
Moderii, 302
Mogg, 106
Molindinarius, 53
Monachus, 24, 40, 40n, 41
Mone (Monnow), riv., 246
Monk, The, 24, 4(1, 40n
Monkenedich, 367
Monmouth, 246, 318, 366
Monmouth, de, 16, 2 In, 44, 45, 318, 319,
320
Monmouth, Geoffiy, 133
Monmouthshire, 2b9n
Montacute, 111
Montchesney, 30, 33n
Montgomery, 36, 298
Montford, 22, 27, 292
Monuments, Sepulchral, 2, 89-95, 226, 232,
343, 344
Moorhead, Warren K., his " Fort Ancient "
noticed, 373
More, de la, 363
Morell, 103
Mortaine, Dean of, 340
Morfurlong, 362
Morgan, 64, S6, 87, 98
Morin, de, 289
Morris, 97, 334, 338
Mort de Freyt, de, 158
Morteyn, 102, 298
Mortimer, 110, 111
Morton, 332, 342
Moseleye, 358, 361, 362, 363
Moster'ton, Ch. Plate at, 470
Morwent, Abb,, 239, 240, 242
Moulshoe, 104, 105
Mountfoid, 111
Mountnorris, 75
Mountnorris, E. of, 106
Morwode-enese, 365
Moyne, le, 24, 39, 39n, 40, 41, 284
Muchegros, de, 364, 368
Mulebache, 359, 367
Muncius, 240
Mundublel, de, 313, 314, 315, 316
Mundublel, Pagan, de, his Knights, 313-
315
Munedcde, meaning of, 359n
Murdac, 302, 305, 306, 306n, 313n
Mu sard, 318, 331
Mustel, 143
Mutton, de, 36, 36n
Nan ton, 246
Nason, 95
Necham, 228
Nerbert, de, 292
Netherweston, 366
Nettlecombe, 86, 87, 88, 89
Nevill, 31n., 110, 111
Newark, 244
Newbury, 313, 315
Newbery, Walter, Abbot, 129
Newborough, 276
Newcomene, 58
Neweman, 57
Newent, 192, 246, 357
Newent, Prior of, 20
Newerende, 360
Newerne, 359, 363, 364, 367
Newernehey, 364
Newernrede, 364, 367
Newington Bagpath, 299, 317
Newinn'ton, de, 296
Newland, 363, 364
Newland, Abbot, his Roll, 117, US, 119,
130
Newmarch, de, 109, 239, 243, 302. 309, 310,
311, 312, 313, 319
Newmarch, Henry, de, his Knights, 309-
310
Newmore, 358
Newnham, 235, 243, 245, 303
Newport Pagnel, 104
Naworth Castle, 105
" Newspaper Reporting,'' by John Pendle-
ton, noticed, 379
Newveton (? Newington), 293
Newton, 249
Nibley, 259
Nicholas, 332, 333
IXDEX.
409
Nicolas, Sir Harris, 307
Nicholls, Rev. H. G., 357
Nicholson, 347
Nightingale, J. E., his " Treatise on the
Ch. Plate of the Diocese of Sarum,
Archdeaconry of Dorset," noticed,U5
Nind, 337
Norensis, de, 294
Norfolk, co., 8
Normandy, Dukes of, 8, 30S
Morris, Archdeacon, 117
Norris, Hugh, his " Somerset. & Dorset
Notes and Queries," noticed, 393
Northamptonshire, 226
Northaston, 98
Northleach, 224, 225, 247, 333
Northleach Brook, 224
Northlepegate, 367
Northumberland, co., 306
Northumberland, K. of, 244
Norwich, St. Gregory's Oh. , Hagoday at,
132
"Notes and Gleanings,'' Edited by W.
Cotton, F.S.A., and James Dallas,
F.L.S., noticed, 395
Nottingham, 318
Nunne, Eiton, Wilts, 226
Oakley, 312
Oddo & Doddo, 263, 269, 278
Odo, the Goldsmith, 293
Okington Park, 280
Okwodebroke, 363, 364
Oldbury, M., 314
Oldefold, 358, 360
Olderende, 360
Old Ford, Bow, 73
" Old Tools," Paper on, by |Mr. R. Taylor,
205
Oldtune, 360
Olney, or Alney, 247
Ordingeton, de, 307, 309
Ori, le, 57, 58
Osberne, 240, 242, 318
Osirus, K., 238
Osleworth, 3U0, 317
Osric, K., 237, 238, 240, 241
Oswald, 243, 244
Oures, 360
Overton, 268
Overtone, 57
Oweres, M., Dorset, 40n
Owseburne, 245
Oxford, All Souls' College, 221
Oxford, co., 6, 25n, 26, 42, 63, 64, 75, 81n,
225, 281, 291n, 332
Oxford, Earl of, 315
Oxford, Trinity Coll., Ch. Plate at, 168
Pagum, 366
Paine, W. H., M.D., In Memoriam, 370
Painswick, 160, 161, 324, 325
Palmer, 2S1
Palmere, le, 354, 360
Palmerius, 57
Parker, Abb., 80, 239, 242
Parkinson, Rev. Thomas, his"Yorkshi
Legends and Traditions " noticed, 185,
186
Parry, 65, 89, 91, 98, 192
Parrye, 347
Parseteway, 361
Parys. 104
Passelew, 23, 38-47, 284
" Passing Thoughtsof a Working Man,"
by Herbert Cloudesley,'no£tced, 379
Pate 332
Patr]ck,*Earl, 314, 315, 316
Paul, 13n
Pauncefot, 237, 309, 312, 313
Payebwallebroke, 362
Payne, 89
Pearce, 2, 189, 347
Peche, 101
Peckham, Archb., 203
Pedigrees —
Annesley, 101, 104, 105, 106, 107
Beauchamp, 275
Bohun, 109, 110
Booth, 111, 112, 113
Brocas, 103, 105
Bret, le, 144
Bruce, 102
Chester, Earls of, 102
Cotton, 101, 104, 105
Dighton, 107, 108
Mortimer, 111
Nevill Richard, Earl of Warwick.de
scendents of, 275
Plantagenet, 110, 111
Rainsford, 9S, 99
Ridware, 101
Roches, 103
St. John, 111, 112
Saxon, Princes, 102
Scotland, Kings of, 102
Stafford, 110, 112
Tyndale, 112
Wessenham, 102, 105
Pedmore Ch., co. Wore, 203
Pembroke, Earls of, 242, 290, 291
Pendleton, John, his "Newspaper Report-
ing," noticed, 279
Pennard, de, 294
Percy, 110
Peritune, de, 358
Perkins, V. R., at Berkeley, 1 ; acts as
Guide at the Castle, 3 ; his remarks
thereon, 3-4
Pershore, 247
Pershore Abbey, 267, 268, 289n.
Pert, 333
Petit, Rev. J. L., his notes on Swindon
Church, 200 ; on Stoke Orchard Ch.,
201 ; on Postlip Chapel, ib., 202 ; his
notes on Postlip Hall and Chapel, 206,
207 ; Sevenhampton, 339, 340
Petiteford, 361
Petty, 347
Philip, ap, 111
Philip, son of Ernulf, 301
Philipps, 104
Phillipps, 333n.
Picard, 302
Picton Castle, 104
Piddesmore, de, 143, 147, 150, 152, 153, 154
Pierpoint, 101
Pileswalle, 364
Pinkeni, de, 302
Pinoke Well, 246
Pirie, de,45, 47, 346
Pirihale, 366
Pirihalethorne, 366
Piriheye, 360
Pitchcombe.— See Pychenecumbe
Planca, de, 124, 284, 299, 301
Plantagenet, 109, 110, 120, 278, 280, 315
Playne, 191
Plecy.de, 103
Poer, de, 207
410
INPEX.
Poictou, 22n, 280
Pole, 110, 112
Polesworth, 98
Pomeroy, de, 292
Ponto, de, 46
Pope, T. S., re-elected on Council, 192
Pormont, de, 293
Poita, de, 55, 58, 238, 241
Portman's Tower, 23*
Postlip Hall and Chapel visited by the
Society, 305, 306 ; Mr. Petit's Notes
on, ib., 207, 211
Potheridge, Devon, 40n.
Poughley, Prior, 129
Pouncefoot, 242
Powell, 81
Power, 104
Powlet, M. . 130
Poyntz, 25S, 282, 292, 296, 226n.
Prentue, 42
Prestbury, 267, 268, 283, 328, 329, 330, 331,
333, 334, 335, 349, 350, 351, 352, 353,
354, 354n.
Prestcote, 278
Priest's acre, 153n.
Price, Rev. H. T., his death, 192
Prinkard, 1, 189 ; re-elected on Council,
194
Prinknash, 240, 243
Prouse, 64, 99
Puber, 319
Puckcombe, 333, 353
Pucklechurch, 266
Pukeputteswey, 367
Pulgcombe, 352
Pulle, la 361, 362
I'ulton, Priory, Wilts, 226
Purefoy, 223
Pustanesbroke, 363
Pychenecumbe (Pitchcombe) Documents
relating- to, by the Kev. J. M. Hall,
141 ; divers field names in, 142, 143 ;
328
Pyrhales, 359
Pyrton, 281
Quedgley, 244
Quiney, 71
Quinton, de, 292, 295
(^uinton, recluse at, 8n.
Quinton, St. de, 23, 303, 304
Racket, 136
Raden, de, 313
Rainsden, de, 36
Rainsford family, 60. 61, 62, 64, 65, 66, 67,
68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 77, 78, 79, 81, S5,
89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 99
Raleigh, 333
Randy, 367
Randwick, 325
Ranulph, Earl of Chester, 100
Rapsgate, Hund., 24, 30, 32, 34
Ravenhulle, de, 143, 146, 14$, 149, 150, 151,
152, 153
Rawe, 57
Reading, 107, 324
Rede, 113 230
Redeford, de, 289
Redin, de, 145
Redmor, 363
Redvers, de, 15
Reed, 355
Reeves, 332
Reinbald, 229
Reini, de, 292
Kendcombe, 24, 26, 231, 295
Report of Council, 189 193
Reric, 52
Reyner, 355
Richard, Abbot, 126
Richard I., K., 227, 2S8
Richard III. K., 230n.
Richard, Earl of Chester, 102
Richard, son of Humphrey, 3U9
Richard, the legate, 315
Ridinge, 367
Ridvvare, 100, 101, 114
Ritthwaye, 361
Rivers, de la, 260
Rivers in Gloucestershire, 247
Robert Curthose, 238, 239, 242, 243
Robert, the Consul, 102, 252, 254, 278
Robert, son of William, 57
Robertson, Rev.W. A. Scott, his " Church
Plate in Kent," Part I., noticed, 387
Roche, 80, 80n, 103
Roche Court, 103
Rochefort, 2S4
Rockhampton, 31S
Rodeberwe, de, 144n, 145, 147, 153 156
Rodborough, 326
Rodington, 104
Rodley, in Westbury Hund., 17
Rodleye, de, 362
Kodmerton, de, 28
Rodmerton, M., 28
Rodolie, de, 293
Roet, 110
Roger Parvus, 306, 307
Rogers, 333
Rollo, D. of Normandy, 273
Rolright Stones, War'r., 281
Rome, 350n.
"Roman Architecture," Paper on, by
Prof. Middleton, 205
Roman Remains, Spoonlev Villa, 208-210 ;
„ „ Chedworth, 214-215
,, ,, Tockington Park, pri-
vate contributions for excavations and
accounts, 216-219 ; 257
Roniulf, 57
Rous, le, 143, 145n, 153, 276, 305
Rowys, 276
Royce, Rey. D.,20S
Ruan, St., Abbey, 138
Ruardene, 365
Ruardene, Bail., 16, 357, 359, 365, 366, 376
Rudele, 361
Kuful, Bishop, 132
Ruggeley:s Walle, 359
Rugvvey, le, 249, 362
Rumbald, 24, 227
Russell, 29, 63, 64, 260, 306, 361
Russellum, 391
Ruthall, 105, 227, 228
Rye, de, 58
Ryniall, 332
St. Brevells, 263, 365, 366, 367, 368
St. German, de, 350
St. John, 111, 113
St. Maryes, de, 124
St. Maur, 36
St. Swithin, Priory, 21
Salisbury, 81, 81n, 278
Salisbury, Bp. of, 27
Salisbury, Cathedral, 223
Salisbury, de, 109, 314
Salisbury, Dean of, 73
"Salisbury Diocese, Church Plate of co.
Dorset," byj. E.Nightingale,)io«tcerf,16o
INDEX.
411
Salop, 209
Saltmarsh, 294, 298, 309, 358
"Sanctuary Knockers," Paper on, by Mrs.
Bagnall-Oakeley, 131-140, 204
Sandiwell, 333
Saric, 43n.
Saumarez, 1S9
Savaricus, Bp., 267
Saxony, Duke of, 285
Scardeburgh, 80
Scarth, Rev. Harry Mengden, Prebend, of
Wells— In Memoriam, 163-164
Scetaresforde, 360, 365, 366, 367
Schepesty, 367
Schipton, see Shipton.
Schipton, de, 24
Schutaresford, 367
Scipweye, 382
Scireburne, 289, 290, 350
Scotland, 267
Scots, Mary, Q., 92
" Scottish Antiquary," The, edited by Rev.
A. W. Cornelius Hallen, noticed, 304
Scrope, Lady, 139
Scrupa, 307, 308, 309
Scrupa, de, Robert, his Knights, 307
Seyttechroneforde, 361, 366
Secrim, 145, 145n.
Sebroke, Abb., 239, 241
Selby, W. D., 47
Selman, 73, 108
Seniannus, 52
Seotelinda, 365
Serjeanties in Forest of Dene, 16, 17, 18,
19
Serlo, 227, 238, 239, 241
Sesincot, de, 346, 350
Sevenhampton, de, 355
Sevenhampton, Church, 210 ; 350, 351,352,
353, 354
Sevenhampton, M., 319, 352
Seven Hundreds : viz., Cirencester, Brad-
ley, Britwoldsbury, Bisley, Kapsgate,
Langtree and Whitson, 21n, 23, 37 ;
227
Severn, Riv., 235, 236, 243, 244, 245-247,
258, 262, 263, 266, 268, 277, 357
Seymore, 147
Seymour, 276
Seyntleye, 359
Seyrrugeforde, 361
Seyrrugge, 367
Shackle, 139
Shaftesbury, 273
Shalyngeford, Harry, Abbot, 128
Shawe, atte, 355
Shay, de, 124
Sheepscombe, 325
Sheperugge, 359, 360
Sherborne, Abbev, 7
Sherborne, M., 290
Shenindon, 295
Shetersforde, 359
Shrewsbury, Roger, E. of, 298, see Mont-
gomery
Shirlev, 104
Shipton, 24, 36, 39, 40, 40n, 332, 333
Shipton, de, 41n.,42
Side, M., 29, 30, 30n, 31n, 33n, 34n.
Sidney, 67
Silvestre, 58
Simon, 268
Simpson, Dr. W. Sparrow, his "Gleanings
from Old St. Paul's" noticed, 170-172
Sindithurst, 342
Sinne, 54
Sintelt, de, 331
Sion, Convent 12
Sireman, 360
Siston, 123. 260
Skinner, 189
Skipton, 24, 41
Skipwith, 333
Sklatter, 80n.
Slaughter, Hund., 18
Slaughter, par., 64, 99, 246
Slepersthorne, 366
Sley, de, 42
Slimbridge, 300, 304
Smalebrok, 361, 365
Smart, 97
Smith, 82, 82n, 86, 192
Smitheswey, 365
Smithfield'st. Barth., 8
Snappe, de, 358
Sned, le, 363
Snowe, Edm. de, Abbot, 128
Sodbury, 224, 229, 230, 248, 249, 257, 258
Sodbury, Camp, 257
Sodbury, Chipping, 258, 260, 265
Sodbury, Little, 28, 2Sn, 248, 258, 265, 266,
323
Sodington, Geoffrey, Cirencester, 37
Solers, de, 32, 35, 207, 333, 354
Solewall, 361
Somerset, 75 266, 291n
"Somerset and Dorset Notes & Queries,"
edited by Hugh Norris and Charles
Herbert Mayo, noticed, 303
Somerset, Duke of, 275
Somery, de, 292
Sondbedderende, 363
Sorus, 291, 295
Southam House, visited by the Society,
205 ; 211, 235, 242, 268
Southants, co., 93
South rop, 297
Spannewey, 360, 367
Spence, Dean. 190, 191
Spencer, 108, 267, 280
Spiring, 46
Sponnegrene, 362, 363, 364
Sponnerede, 363
Spoonley Wood, Roman Villa in, visited,
208, 211
Spure, 366
Sprynge, 118
Spylemcn, 146,147, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153,
156, 159, 160
Stackhouse, Rev. J. L., receives Society at
Berkeley Ch., 1 ; his remarks thereon,
1-3, 190
Stacey, Rev. J. T. C, 211
Stafford, 110, 112, 118, 226
Staffordshire, 46 75, 89
Stainling, de, 319
Standish Church, 141 ; almonry, 159, 160 ;
Tithe apportionment, 162 ; 336
Standish, M., 141, 336
Standish par., 141
Standish, de, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153, 154,
155
Stanesford ?, de, 292
Stanhope, 75, 104
Stanley, Regis, 310n.
Stanley, St. Leonards, 240, 243, 298, 299n,
317
Stanton, 364,365, 367
Stanton, Harold, 104
Stanway, 231, 268, 276n, 278
Stapelegge, 302
Staples' Inn, 74
Stapuleg, 361
412
INDEX.
"State Papers," Domestic, Calendar of,
byW. D. Hamilton, Esq., F.S.A., 1644-
1645, noticed, 371
,, Ireland, Calendar of. by Hans
Claude Hamilton, Esq., F.S.A., 1590-
1596, noticed, 380
Staunton, Bailiwick, 357, 358, 363, 369
Staunton, de, 36, 143, 157
Stauntunesforde, 367
Staventon, 103
Stephen, K., 117, 121, 254, 286, 349
Stevenson, 190, 192
Stodley Priory, 18, 18n
Stoke, 18, 256
Stoke Archer, 47, 201, see also Stoke Or-
chard.
Stoke Giffard, 318
Stoke Orchard Church visited, 201, 202,
203
Stoketon, de, 352
Stokey, 98
Stone, de, 124
Stonehouse, de, 143, 148, 150, 291
Stourton, de, 41
Stow, 15, 363
Stow, John, 224
Stowcll, 29, 225
Stow-on-the-VVold, 97, 246, 247, 281, 333
Stradewy, 18
Stratford, fam., 201
Stratford-upon-Avon, 63, 64, 79n, 80, 80n,
95 97
Stratton, 29, 105, 333
Strensham, 63
Striguil, Hon. of, 290, 290n, 291n
Striguil, Prior of, 351
Strongbow, 239, 242, 243
Stroud, 321, 370
Stubbs. Dr., 2S5n, 286n
" Studies in Evolution and Biology," by-
Alice Bodington, noticed, 377
Sturminster Newton, Church Plate, 168
Sturmy, 201
Stuttebrugge, 358
Sudeley Castle, 208, 232, 233, 242, 247
Sudeley, de, 143, 158, 266, 306, 307, 309
Sudeley, de, Ralph, his Knights, 306
Sunneworth, de, 301
Surman, 203, 204
Sutton Poyntz, 282
Sutton, Thomas, Abbot, 129
Swell, 246
Suymede, 359
Swalo, Cardinal, 255
Swavne, S. H., 189; re-elected on Coun-
cil, 192
Swefforde, 362
Swindon Church visited by the Society,
200 ; remarks on, by the late Rev. J.L.
Petit, 200 ; compared with Ozleworth,
ib.
Swereford, de, 287, 298
Swinfield, Bp., 351n
Sychetter, 367
Symonds, the late, Rev. W. S., 348
Symond's Yat, 357, 365
Tabbingeweye, 362
Tadington, 278
Tailor, the 45
Tainton, Little, 18, 47
Talbot, of Goodrich, 369
Talbot, of Grafton, 230
Talbot, Rev. the Hon., 211 ; receives the
Society at Withington Church, 213
Tame, 225, 226, 231
Tancarville, 308
Tara, 138
Taulton, 66, 66n
Taylor, Rev. C. S., 28, 329
Taylor, R., M.A., reads a Paper on " Old
Tools," 205 ; is thanked, 211 ; the
same printed, 321
Temple, 161
Temple, London, 73
Terendakes, St., 247, 247n
' ' Testa de Nevill Returns for Gloucester,"
by Sir HenryBarkley, K.C.B., &c,
14-47
Tetbury, 229, 230, 247, 280, 281, 283
Tetbury, de, 284
Tetbury, M., 28, 28n
Tewdesdeburv, 143, 160
Tewkesbury, 231, 235, 242, 243, 246, 247,
256, 265, 266, 267, 268, 269, 276n, 277,
278, 279
Tewkesbury, Abbey, 207, 212, 225, 290, 296
Tewkesbury, Hon., 295
Tewkesbury, Lordship of, 50, 51, 201
Tewkesbury, M., 50, 276
Tewkesbury Park, 276n
Tew Magna, 91, 98
Texter, 54
Thames, riv., 246
Thedingworth, 105
Themifthorp, 112
Theobalds, 69, 99
Theocus, 268
Theodosius, 133, 137
Thoky, 254
Thomas, Archb. of York, 238, 241
Thorel, 46
Thorp, Dr. D. L., his death, 192
Thornbury, 112, 192, 238 239, 240, 243,
245, 261, 298
Thornbury, de, 293
Thormington, see Farminnton.
Throgmorton, 144n, 259, 276, 332, 333
Thurcaston, 101
Thurganby, 106
Thurstanesbrok, 264
Tickenham, 263
Tiddington, 96
Timbrell, 334, 345
Tintern, Abb. of, 283
Tinthescombe, de, 358
Tirel, 36
Tirley, 319
Tockington, M., 296, 296n
Tockington Park, Roman Villa at, 192
Todington, 231, 233, 234, 235, 306, 307
Todington stream, 231
Tomes, 70, 96
Toning, de, 289
Tooker, 106
"Tools and Implements, Old," remarks
on, by Robert Taylor, M.A., 321-327
Toulouse, 287
Torel, 302, 305, 305n
Torinton, see Farmington.
Tormarton, 260, 261, 314, 314n, 315
Tormarton, de, 315
Torneant, 293
Torquay, 95
Tortworth, 259, 260, 311, 312, 333
Tortworth, riv., 262
Townsend, 332
Tracev, 231, 234, 237, 278, 306, 307, 334
Traili, de, 292
Trajectus, 231
Tredington Church, Glouc. visited, 203 ;
remarks on, by Rev. John Green, ib. ;
Plague at, 204
INDEX.
413
Trcdington, Glouc. 200
Tredingdon, Wore, 67
Trellemede, 363
Trellemedesese, 363
Trenched, meaning of, 360n
Trentham, 75, 104
Tresham, 276, 2rf
Tresham Hall, 2^2
Trewsbury, 25, 26, 29
Trinley, 319
Troncester, (sic), Abb., 242
1 rotman, 201
Trovts, Col., 189
Trusted, 1
Tudor, 235. 267
Tumour, 61
Turri, de, 294
Turstin, 310
Turville, de, 24, 25, 318
Tutbury, 69
Twining, 23, 268
Tvndale, 77, S3, 106, 107, 112
Ugina, de, 330
Uley, de, 2S4, 299, 301
Uley Tumulus, 191
Ulfinyenok, 363
Umberley, 293
Umfraville, 292
Underwood, 225
Upcote, 333
Upton, IS, 245
Urman, 270
Valentia, Viscount, 75
Valery, St., 283, 284
Valery, St., Barony, 28
Valoniis, 292
Vassar-Smith, (President), at Berkeley,
1 ; at Cheltenham, 189 ; elected Vice-
President, 192 ; is thanked as Presi-
dent, 212
Vasbaches, 359
Vastlachesrende, 360
Vaux, 276
Veel, 283, 284
Venables, 104, 111
Vere, 313, 315, 316, 318
Vernon, 81, 103
Villiers, de, 293
Vineyard, 240, 243
Visses Croft. 359
Vokshalegrene, 365
Vuerhunteneforde, 359
Wadeham, 260
Wake, 293
Wainman, 346
Waloerg, de, 293
Walbervne, 124
Walch,*248, 257, 292, 296
Waldegrave, 113
Waldeschief, 101
Waldinges, 361
Waldingesworthine, 363, 364
Walemore, 358, 359
Walery, St , see Valery.
Wales, 246, 291n, 334
Waleworth, 19
Waller, F. W., 190
Wallingford College, 225
Wallingford, Hon., 28
Walpole, St. Andrew's, Norfolk., recluse's
cell at, 8
Walraund, 44
Waltheof, barl, 102
Walter, the Constable, 295, 303, 304
Walter, son of Yvonis, 56
Walton, Cardiff, 290
Warburton, 113
Wareham, 7, 12
Warimund, de, 284
Warniwalle, 366
Warren, 72, 1S9, 207
Warrenne, de, 40n
Wartokesey, 364
V\ arwick, Co., 53, 59, 64, 65, 66, 68, 70, 78,
92, 96, 281
Warwick, Earl of, 59, 258, 260, 363
Waspail, 292
Waterbach Farm, 210
Wathen, 323
Watts, 82, S2n, 97, 108, 332
Wayte, 79, 7Kn
Webster, Rev. G. E., 203, 211
Welle, atte, 354, 355
Wellington, 2»4
Wells, 78, 231, 266
Wenlok, 275
Wenman, 332, 337
Wenrich,de, 289
Wenrich, IS
Wapley, M., 299
Werstanus, 267
Wessenham, 102, 105
West, 77
Westbrok, 267
Westbury, Hund., 17
Westbury-on-Severn, 246. 304
" Western Antiquary " The, edited by W.
H. K. Wright, noticed, 394
Wethered, E., Hon. Treas., Cheltenham,
189, 211 ; Guide at Chedworth, 215
Westmede, 358
Westminster, Abb. of, 289n, 313, 319
Westminster, Sanctuary at, 134, 140
Weston, 320
Weston Birt, 37, 143, 144
Westwell, Oxon, 297
Whaddon, 334
Whateley, 276
Whistler, 98
White, 347
White's Hill, 325
Whiteney, 281
Whitewell, 333
Whitney, 111
Whitmaster, 237
Whitstan Hund., 23n, 37
Whittington, Church visited, 213 ; por-
tion of Brass recently lost, 213
Whittington Court visited, 210, 211, 213,
333
Whittington, II., 308, 309, 333
W'ichingham, 276
Widye, 54
Wien, de, 350
Wigheiete, 3f 7
Wight, Isle of, 15
Wigmore, Mon., 125
Wikes, 230, 252, 257
Wilicote, de, 57
William, Abb., 60, 63, 139, 233
William Conq., 50, 51, 102, 109, 134, 238,
241, 267, 269, 278, 282, 286, 357
William, son of Alured, 309
William, son of Baldwin, 299
William, son of Norman, 18, 26, 37
William, son of Robert, 53, 59
William, son of Simonds, 53, 59
William (Rufus), K., 285, 298
414
INDEX.
William (the Lion) K. of Scots, 100
Williams, 57, 347
Wills, 78, 79
Willvson, 332
Wilton, 191, 27S
Wiltshire, 24, 30, 33, 39, 40, 42, 43n, 44,
46, 89, 291n, 295, 312, 315, 316, 318
Wimberleye, 364
Winchelsea, de, 294
Winchester, 133
Winchester, Bp. of. 103, 297, 302, 30
Winchcombe. 192; visited, 203; 232, 233,
235, 242, 247, 333
Winchcombe Abbey, 306 ; Missal, 20S; 232,
233, 268, 289
Winchcombe, Abbot, 232, 332
Winchcombe, Abbot of, 20
Winchcombe, Abb, Knights of, 289
Winchcombe Ch., 232, 351
Winchcombe, Priors of, 232. 233
Winchcombe, St. Peter's Ch., 232, 233,
231
Winchcombe, Spittle Hosp., 233
Wincott, M. , 64, 67, 99
Wineston, 32
Winnecote, de, 55
Winrush, 43, 44, 290
Winterbourne, M , 296, 297n
Winterboum Hun., Som., 43, 43n, 44
Winterwall thornes, 366
Winton, de, 292, 352
■wise, 79
Witeng(ham)? 292
Witts, G. B. , Local Sec. , Cheltenham, 189 ;
Guide to Cleeve Hill Camp, 205 ;
211 ; Guide at Chedworth, 215
Witchell, E., Local Sec. Stroud Meeting,
191
Wokingham, 39, 42
Wokings, 39
Wolfinyenot, 333, 364, 365, 366, 367
Wolfstan, Bp„ 238, 241
Wolphine, 238, 241
Worcester, 78, 242, 342, 346
"Worcester Archdeaconry," by Rev. W.
Lea, 265
Worcester, Bps. of, 18, 125, 208, 237, 238,
241, 244, 289n, 305, 313, 335, 349, 350,
350n
Worcester, Co., 18, 63, 64, 72, 98, 231, 2S1,
2S9, 291 n, 313, 319
Woodvyle, Q. Elizabeth, 139
Woodroffe, 317
Woodward, 78, 362
Wotton Ch.,6
Wotton, 258
Wright, 332
Wright, W. H. K., his " Western Anti-
quary," noticed, 394
Wrokeshal, de 284
W rough ton, 276
Wrotley, 111
Wy, 281
Wyatt, 191
Wybaltunesbroke, 364
Wybert. 21n, 44
Wycombe, 334
Wydenheye, 360, 367
Wydville, 110
Wye, 161
Wye, fam., 144n
Wye, riv., 246, 247, 357, 364, 365
Wyggepol, 366, 367
Wylcott, 91
W'yle, Church Plate at, 168
Wylcockes ruddingge, 360
Wylington, de, 30, 33n, 143n
Wynchcombe, de, 79
Wychtmed, 358
Wynderusch, 281
Wyndsore, 64
Wvnston, 35
Wyteleye, 358, 363, 364
Wyntereode, 363
Wvnetesburi, 363
Wyse, 281
Wyteleve, 360
Wtvweile, de, 335
Yaneworth, 146, 154, 156, 159
Yuichebeche, 362
Yon»'e 332
York, Archbs. of, 20, 238, 244, 305
York, Duke of, 139, 225
York, See of, 244
Yorkshire, 21, 89
" Yorkshire Chap Books," by C. A. Fed-
erer, L.C.P., 185
" Yorkshire Legends and Traditions," by
Rev. Thomas Parkinson, noticed, 86
Ythenard, 145, 146, 149, 152
Yweley, see Uley.
BRISTOL <fc GLOUCESTERSHIRE ARCHAEOLOGICAL
SOCIETY
|Cist oi ffizmbtXB for 1890-1
SEPTEMBER 21st, 1890
Names op Life Members are given in heavier type
An asterisk is affixed to the names of Members of Council, 1890-1
Tlw Secretary mill feel obliged by any correction of error in List
Ackers, B. St. John, Huntley Manor, Gloucester
Adams, J. W., 4, Denmark Road. Gloucester
Adlam, William, F.S.A.. D.L., Manor House, Chew Magna, Bristol
*Agg-Gardner. James Tynte, M.P., Evesham House, Cheltenham
*Allard, W., Tewkesbury
Allen, Rev. William Taprell. MA., St. Briavel's Vicarage, Coleford
Ames, Reginald, 13 Hyde Park Mansions. London, W.
Annesley. Rev. F. H., M.A., Clifford Chambers Manor House, Stratford-on-
Avon
Ansloe, Robert. 7 Clarence Square, Cheltenham
Archer, Lieut.-Col., Cleeve House. 11, All Saints Road. Clifton
Armitage, W. H., Wotton-under-Edge
Arrowsmith, J. W., 24, Westfield Park, Redland, Bristol
Asher & Co., 13 Bedford Street, Covent Garden, London, W.C.
Baker, Arthur, Henbury Hill House, Bristol
Baker, Granville E. Lloyd, Hardwicke Court, Gloucester
Baker, James, F.G.S., Sewelle Villa, Goldney Road, Clifton
Baker, W. Proctor, Broomwell House, Brislington, Bristol
Ball, A. J. Morton. The Green, Stroud
Banks, G, Longford, Gloucester
Barclay, Rev. Chas. W..M.A, Little Amwell Vicarage, Hertford Heath, Herts
* Barkly. Sir Henry, K.C.B.. G.C.M.G., 1, Bina Gardens, South Kensington.
London, S.W.
* Bartleet, Rev. S. E., M.A., St. Mark's Vicarage, Gloucester
Bartholomew F.M., B.A., 28, College Road. Clifton, Bristol
Bathurst, The Right Hon. the Earl, Cirencester
Baylis, E. L., Essex Place, Cheltenham
Baynes, C. R., The Lammas, Minchinhanipton
Bayton, Francis Nathaniel. Clarence Street. Gloucester
Bazley, Sir Thomas S., Bart., Hatherop Castle, Fairford
n.
* Bazeley, B/'v. William. M.A., Matson Rectory, Gloucester (Hon. Member,)
(Hon. Secretary and Librarian)
Beach, The Rt. Hon. Sir Michael E. Hicks, Bart., D.L., M.P.,
WiUiamstrip Park, Fairford
* Beddoe, John, M.D., F.R.S., Manor House, York Place, Clifton. Bristol
Bell, Rev. Canon Charles Dent, D.D., The Rectory, Cheltenham
Berkeley, Francis L.. Riverside, San Barnardino, California, U.S.A.
Bethel. W. Wood, 7. Queen Anne's Gate, Westminster. London
Bevir, E. J., Q.C., 110, Harley Street. London. W.
Bibliotheque Nationale, Paris, c/o Longman & Co., 39 Paternoster Row.
London
Biddell, Sidney, New University Club, St. James' Street. London. S.W.
Birchall, J. Dearman, Bowden Hall. Gloucester
Birchall. Miss. Lanesfield. Lansdown Road, Cheltenham
Birtill, G. S., Gort Lodge, The Avenue. Clifton
Blacker. Rev. B. H., M.A., 26, Meridian Place, Clifton, Bristol
* Blakeway, G. S.. Myton House, Gloucester
Blandy, F., Birchamp House, Newland, Coleford
* Blathwayt, Rev. Wynter T.. M.A., Dyrham Rectory, Chippenham
Blathwayt, Rev. Wynter Edward M.A. Dyrham. Chippenham
Blathwayt, Geo- W. Wynter, 35 Church Street, Manchester
Blathwayt, Lieut. Colonel, Batheaston, Bath
Bodleian Library, Oxford
Bonnor, Benjamin. Barnwood, Gloucester
Boughton, J. H., Tewkes*bury
* Bourne, Rev. Gr. D., M.A., D.L., F.S.A., Weston-sub-Edge, Broadway
Bower, Rev. E. J., M.A.
* Bowly. Christopher, Siddington House, Cirencester
Braikenridge, W. Jerdone. 1(1 Royal Crescent, Bath
Bramble, Lieut-Col. James Roger, F.S.A., Cleeve House, near Yatton,
Somerset
Bravender. T. B., c/o Mrs. Baden, 14, Highbury Grove, London, N.
BriggS, William, Exchange. Bristol
* Bruton. H. W.. Bewick House, Wotton, Gloucester
Bruton, James, Wotton Hill Cottage, Gloucester
Buchanan, James. " Standard" Office. Gloucester
Burder, G. F.. M.D., F. Met. Society, 7, South Parade. Clifton. Bristol
Burroughs, Jno. Beamies Cooper. 24, Bridge Street, Bristol
Bush, Edward, Alveston, R.S.O. Gloucestershire
Bush, James Day, 3, Miles' Buildings. Bath
Bush, John, 9, Pembroke Road, Clifton, Bristol
Bush, T. S., c/o Rev. C. Bush, 1, Winifred's Dale, Bath
Bute, The Most Honorable the Marquis of. Cardiff Castle. Glamorganshire
Butterworth. Rev. George, M.A. , Deerhurst Vicarage, Tewkesbury
Caldicott, Rev. J. W., D.D., Shipston-on-Stour Rectory, Worcestershire
Campbell, Sir James, Bart.,Whitemead Park. Coleford
Cardew, C. E., A.M.I.C.E..c/o. King, King & Co., Bombay
Cardew, G. A., Bayshill Villas, Cheltenham
Cardew, Rev. John Haydon, M.A., Wingfield Rectory, Trowbridge, Wilts
Carleton, John Shaw. Newnham
Cartwright, F. F.. 1, St. Stephen Street, Bristol
Cave, Charles, D-, M.A., D.L., Stoneleigh House, Clifton Park. Bristol
Chance, T. H., " Journal" Office, Gloucester
Cheeseman, Rev. A. H., Hopewell House, Gloucester
Cheetham, Joshua Milne. Eyford Park, Bourton-on-the-Water. R.S.O.
Cheltenham Free Public Library, Librarian Mr. W. Jones
Cheltenham Permanent Library. 5, Royal Crescent, Cheltenham
Chilton, George Horace David. The Hermitage, Westbury-on-Trym, Bristol
111.
Christian, Admiral, Heigthorne, The Park, Cheltenham
Church A. H., M.A., F.R.S., Shelsley, Kew, Surrey
Clarke, Alfred Ales., Wells, Somerset
* Clark, George T., F.S.A., Talygarn, Llantrissant
Clark, Rev. Thomas E., M. D., Ballargue. Peel, Isle of Man
Clarke, Rev. Canon, D.D., Bishop's House, Clifton, Bristol
Clarke. Miss, 86, Pembroke Road, Clifton, Bristol
Clarke, John A. Graham, Frocester, Stonehouse
Clifton College Library
* Clifford, The Hon. and Rt. Rev. Bishop, Bishop's House, Clifton, Bristol
Cockshott, Miss, Hazlehurst, Ross
Collier, Col. James A., Stanley Hall, Stonehouse
Collins, J. C, M.D., Steanbridge House, Slad, Stroud
Collins, Thomas, The Cross, Tewkesbury
Cook, Francis, M.D., 1, Suffolk Lawn, Cheltenham
Cook, Surgeon General, H.N.D., Prior's Mesne, Lydney
Cooke, W. H., Q.C., F.S.A., 42, Wimpole Street, London
Coren, Edward Walker, Gloucester
Cornock, Nicholas, Camberwell, London, S.E.
Cornford, Rev. Edward, M.A.. Etchowe, Lansdown Road, Cheltenham
Cornwall, Rev. Alan Kingscote, M.A. Ashcroft, Wotton-under-Edge
Cotteswold Naturalists Field Chih. Hon. Sec, E. Wethercd, Esq. 5, Berkeley
Place, Cheltenham, Hon. Member
Cowburn, Major J. Brett, Dennil Hill, near Chepstow
Cowley, Charles, L.L.D., 12 Middle Street, Lowell, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Crawley-Boevey, A., East India United Service Club, 14, St. James'
Square, London, S.W.
Crawley-Boevey, Sir T. H., Bart-, Flaxley Abbey. Newnham
Crawley-Boevey, Rev. R., M.A., Flaxley Vicarage, Newnham
Cripps, Wilfred, C.B., F.S.A., Barrister-at-Law, Cirencester
Croggan. Edmund, 4, Beaufort Road, Clifton, Bristol
Croome, T. L., 50 Pall Mall, London, S.W.
Crossman, George D., Rudgeway, Gloucestershire
Crothers, Capt. Wallace G., Highfields, Chew Magna
Cruddas, C. J., Oakfield, Stoke Bishop, Bristol
Cullimore, J.. Friars, Chester
Cullis, F. J., F.G.S., Claremont Road, Handsworth, Birmingham
Dale, Henry F.
Dancey, Charles Henry, 6, Midland Road, Gloucester
Davenport-Hill, Miss Florence, 25, Belsize Avenue. London, N.W.
*Davies, Rev. John Silvester, M.A., F.S.A., Vicarage, Enfield Highway,
London
Davies, Rev. W. H. Silvester, M.A., 2, Montpellier Road, Gloucester
Davis, Major Charles E., F.S.A., 55, Gt. Pulteney Street, Bath
Davis, William B.A.. L.L.D., St. Germains, Cheltenham
Davis, Cecil Tudor, The Court House, Painswick
D Argent, Edward Augustus, Charlton Kings, Cheltenham
De Paravicini, Rev. F., Avening Rectory, Stroud
De Saumarez, F. B., 5, Queen's Parade, Cheltenham
De Ferrieres, Baron, Bayshill House, Cheltenham
Denton, C. Lord. Orielton, St. Briavels. Coleford
Derham, Henry, Sneyd Park, Bristol
Derham, Walter, MA., F.G.S., 119 Lansdowne Rd. , Kensington Park,W.
Dighton, Conway, St. Julian's, Cheltenham
Dobell, C. Faulkner. Whittington Court, Andoversford, Cheltenham
Dobell, Clarence Mason, The Grove, Charlton Kings, Cheltenham
Doggett, Hugh Greenfield, 30, Richmond Terrace, Clifton
Dolman, G. T. C, St. Mary's Hill, Inchbrook, Stroud
IV.
* D'Ombrain, Rev. H., M.A., The Vicarage, Stroud
Dominican Priory, Rev. Prior of. Woodchester, Stonehouse
* Dorington, Sir J. E., Bart., M.A., M.P., Lypiatt Park. Stroud
Downing, William. Sisringfield House, Olton. near Birmingham
Drew, Joseph, M.D.. Pembroke Lodge, Charlton Kings, Cheltenham
Ducie, The Right Hon. the Earl of, P.O., F.R.S.,Tortworth, Wotton-
under-Edge
Dyer-Edwardes, Thomas, Prinknash Park. Painswick, Stroud
Dynevor, The Right Hon. Lord, Dynevor Castle, Llandilo, S. Wales
Eager, Reginald, M.D., Northwoods, Winterbourne, Bristol
Eberle, J. F.. 96, Pembroke Road, Clifton
Edkins, William, 12, Charlotte Street, Park Street. Bristol
Edwards, Sir George W., Sea-wall Villas, Sneyd Park, Bristol
* Ellacombe, Rev. Canon H. N., M.A. , Vicarage, Bitton, Bristol
Ellett, Robert, Oakley Cottage. Cirencester
Ellis, T. S., 6, Clarence Street, Gloucester
Emeris, Rev. John, M.A., The Rectory, Upton St. Leonard's, Gloucester
Emeris, Rev. William, Upton St. Leonard's Rectory, Gloucester
Evans, J. B., 20. Lansdown Crescent, Cheltenham
Farquhar. Rev. E. M.. M.A., Bradley Court, Wotton-under-Edge
Fawcett, Miss E. G., Painswick, Stroud
Fawn, James, 18, Royal Promenade. Queen's Road, Bristol
Fear. W. Lyne, 9, South Parade, Clifton
Fendick, R. G., 3 Claremont Place, St. Paul's Road, Clifton
Fenwick, Rev. J. E. A., M.A., Thirlestaine House, Cheltenham
* Fisher. Major C. Hawkins. The Castle, Stroud
*Flower, Edgar, The Hill, Stratford-on-Avon
Foljambe, Cecil G. S., M.P., Cockglode, Ollerton, Newark
Flecker, The Rev. W. H. D.C.L., Dean Close's School, Cheltenham
Flux, Edward HitchingS, 144, Leadenhall Street, London, E.C.
* Forbes, Col. G. H. A., R.A., Rockstowes, Dursley
Foster, R. G., 2, Spa Villas, Gloucester
* Fox, Alderman Francis Frederick, Yate House, Chipping Sodbury
Fox, Charles Henry, M.D., The Beeches, Brislington, Bristol
Foxcroft, E. T. D., D.L., Hinton Charterhouse, Bath
Francis, G. Carwardine, St. Tewdric, Chepstow
Fry, Francis J., Eversley, Leigh Woods. Bristol
Fry, Lewis, M.P., Goldney House, Clifton. Bristol
Fuller, Rev. E. A., M.A., c/o Rev. T. W. Harvey, 71 Ashley Road, Bristol
Gael, E. C, Charlton Kings, Cheltenham
Gaisford, Rev. Thomas Amyas, M.A., 2, Devonshire Place, Wells Road, Bath
Gallenga, Antonio, The Fall. Llandogo. Coleford
Gloucester, The Very Rev. The Dean of, The Deanery. Gloucester
George, C. E. A.. Henbury Hill, Westbury-on-Trvm. Bristol
George, Rev. P. E., M.A., St. Winifred's, Bath
George, W. E., Downside, Stoke Bishop. Bristol
George, William, St. Wulfsten's, Durclham Down, Bristol
Gibbs, H- Martin, Barrow Court. Flax-Boivrton. Somerset
Giller, William Thomas, County of Gloucester Bank, Gloucester
Godman, E. T., Banksfee, Moreton-in-Marsh
Godwin, J. G., 15, St. George's Row. Pimlico, London, S.W.
Golightly, Rev. Canon T. G., M.A., Shipton Moyne Rectory. Tetbury
Green -Armytage, A., 16, Apsley Road. Clifton
Green, Rev. J. F.. M.A., Whiteshill, Stroud
Greenfield. Benjamin Wyatt. 4. Cranbury Terrace, Southampton
Gresley, The Rev. Nigel W., M.A., The Rectory, Dursley
Griffith, Robert W., Ty Dyfrig. Llandaff
Grist, William Charles, Brookside, Chalford, Stroud
Gwinnett, Wm. Henry, Gordon Cottage, Cheltenham
Haddon John, Clarefield, Cheltenham
Hallett, W. E. S., Kenwick House, Selsley, Stroud
Hale, C. B., Claremont House. London Road, Gloucester
Hale, Major Gen. Robert, Alderley, Wotton-under-Edge
* Hall, Rev. J. M., M.A., The Rectory, Harescoinbe, Stroud
Hall. Rev. R., M.A., Saul Vicarage, Stonehouse
Hallen. Rev. A. W. Cornelius, M.A., The Parsonage, Alloa N.B.
* Hallett, Palmer, M.A., Claverton Lodge. Bath
Hallett, Mrs., Claverton Lodge, Bath
Hallewell. Joseph Watts, D.L.. Stratford House. Stroud
Harding, E. B., 2 1 , Great George Street, Bristol
Harding, Rev. John Taylor, M.A., Pentwyu, Monmouth
Harding, Thomas, Wick House, Brislington, Bristol
Hardy, Rev. H. H., M.A., The Rectory, Mitcheldean
Harford, William Henry, Old Bank, Bristol
Harford, Edmund, 14, Priory Street, Cheltenham
* Hartland. Ernest, M.A., Hardwicke Court, Chepstow, (Hon. Treasurer.)
Hartland, E. Sidney, Barnwood Court, Gloucester
Harvard College, U.S.A., c/o Trubner & Co., Ludgate Hill, London
Harvey, Rev. W. H. Peyton, M.A., The Vicarage, Chipping Sodbury
Harvey, Charles Octavius, Bedford Villa, Richmond Hill, Clifton, Bristol
Harvey, Edward, 3, Clifton Park, Clifton, Bristol
Harvey, John, Glenside, Leigh Woods, Clifton, Bristol
Hasluck, Rev. E., M.A., Little Sodbury, Chipping Sodbury
Hayward, Venerable Archdeacon, The Vicarage, Cirencester
* Heane, William C, The Lawn, Cinderford
Heffernan, Surgeon-General, Eton Villa, The Park, Cheltenham
Helps, Arthur S.. Gloucester
Hemming, Rev. B. F., M.A., Bishop's Cleeve Rectory, Cheltenham
Henly, E. H., Wotton-under-Edge.
Herapath, Howard M., 40 Royal Park, Clifton
Hill, Charles, Clevedon Hall, Somerset
Hilliard, Rev. J. A. S., Tidenham Vicarage, Chepstow
Holbrow, Rev. Thomas, B.A., Sandhurst Rectory, Gloucester
* Holford, Robert S., D.L., Weston Birt House. Tetbury
Howard, Edward Stafford, The Castle, Thornbury
Howell, Rev. W. C, M.A., Holy Trinity Vicarage. Tottenham, London, N.
* Hudd, Alfred E., F.S.A., 94, Pembroke Road, Clifton, Bristol
Hudden, William Paul, Brockley Hall, near Bristol
Hughes, W. W., Downfield Lodge, Clifton, Bristol
* Hyett, F. A., Painswick House, Painswick
Isaac, Miss, Stratford Abbey College, near Stroud
* Jacques. Thomas W., The Firs, Downend, near Bristol
* James, Francis, Edgeworth Manor, Cirencester
James, Rev. H. A., B.D., Cheltenham College, Cheltenham
Jefferies, A. G. W., Ash Lodge, Pucklechurch. near Bristol
Jefferies, James E. , Yeo Bank, Congresbury, Bristol
Jefferson, David, Boston, U.S.A., c/o. Messrs. Sampson & Lowe, 188 Fleet-
street, E.C.
VI.
Jenkins, R. Palmer, Sedbury Park, Chepstow
Jenkinson, Sir George S., Bart., D.L., Eastwood Park, Falfield
Jennings, Rev. A. C., M.A., King's Stanley Rectory, Stonehouse
Jones, His Honour Judge Brynmor, L.L.B., College Green, Gloucester
Jones, Rev. Thos. D., Caerwent, Chepstow
Judge, Frederick, 90, Richmond Park Road, Montpellier, Bristol
* Kay, Sir Brook, Bart., Stanley Lodge, Battledown, Cheltenham,
(President of Council)
Keble, Rev. Thomas, M.A., Bisley Vicarage, Stroud
Keeling, George Baker. Severn House, Lydney
* Keeling, George William, 10 Lansdown Terrace, Cheltenham
Kempson, P. R., Birchyfield, Bromyard, Worcestershire
Kempson, Matthew, Stouts Hill, Uley, Dursley
Kerr, Russell J., The Haie, Newnham
King, Miss, Avonside, Clifton Down, Bristol
Kitcat, Rev. D., M.A., Weston Birt Rectory, Tetbury
Knowles, W., Albion Chambers, King Street, Gloucester
Kynnersley, T. S., Leighton Hall, Ironbridge, Salop
Lancaster, Thomas, Bownham House, Stroud
Lang, Robert, 5, Melbury Terrace, Blanford Square, London, N.W.
Langley, A. F., Golding, Peterstow-super-Ely, Cardiff
Latimer, John, 3, Trelawney Road, Bristol
Law, William, Littleborough, near Manchester
Lavars, John, 3, Fosseway, Clifton
Lavicount, S. W., Elm Villa, Cheltenham
* Le Blanc, Arthur, Prestbury House, near Cheltenham
* Leigh, William, Woodchester Park, Stonehouse
Leigh, E. Egerton, Broadwell Manor House, Stow-on-the-Wold
Lewis, Archibald M., Upper Byron Place, Clifton, Bristol
Lewis, Harold, B.A., "Mercury " Office, Bristol
Lindsay, W. A., M.A., Portcullis Pursuivant of Arms, 17, Cromwell Road,
South Kensington, London, S.W.
Little, E. Caruthers. Field Place, Pakenhill. Stroud
Little, E. P., Lansdown, Stroud
Liverpool Free Library
Llewellin, John, Elgin Park, Redland, Bristol
London Library, 12, St. James' Square, London
Long, Lieut. Col., William, Woodlands, Congresbury, R.S.O., East Somerset
Low, Charles Hoskins, Leigh Woods, Clifton. Bristol
Lowe, C. J., 8 St. Stephen's Street, Bristol
Lower, Nynian H., Olveston, Almondsbury
Loveridge. P. B., 11 Victoria Terrace, Cheltenham
* Lucy, "William C, F-G-.S., Brookthorpe, Gloucester
Lynes, Rev. W., M.D., Cinderford Vicarage, Newnham
Lysaght, John, Springfort, Stoke Bishop, Bristol
Maclaine, Win. Osborne, D.L., Kington. Thornbury
* Maclean, Sir John, F.S.A., F.R.S.A., Glasbury House, Richmond Hill,
Clifton, Bristol, (Hon. Editor)
Macpherson, J., Invercargill, New Zealand
Madan, Rev. Canon, M.A., Bearland House, Gloucester
Manchester Library, Manchester
Margetson, William, Brightside, Stroud
Marling, Capt. Walter B., Clanna, Lydney
Marling, Stanley, Stanley Park, Stroud
Marrs, Kingsmill, c/o Baring Bros., Bankers, London
Vll.
* Martin A. T., M.A., 10 Upper Belgrave Road, Clifton, Bristol
Master, Rev. G. S., M.A., Bourton Grange. Flax Bourton. R.S.O., Somerset
Master, Mrs. Chester, The Abbey, Cirencester
Matthews, Bernard, Lloyd's Bank, Gloucester
Meadway, G., South Lawn, The Park, Cheltenham
* Medland, Henry, Kingsholm. Gloucester
Merrick, Frank, 7, Hughenden Road, Clifton, Bristol
* Middleton, J. H., M.A., F.S.A., King's College, Cambridge
Middlemore-Whithard, Rev. T. M., M.A., Upton Helion Rectory, Credi ton,
Devon
Mills. H. Hamilton, The Field, Stroud
Mills, John, 27, Archibald Street, Gloucester
Millard, C. Stuart, 2, York Villas, Cheltenham
Mitf ord, A. B. , Freeman, Moreton-in-Marsh
Monk, C. J., 5, Buckingham Gate, London, S.W.
Morris, R. Groves, 5 Beaufort Buildings, Spa, Gloucester
Mott, Albert J., F.G.S., Detmore, Charlton Kings, Cheltenham
Mugliston, Rev. J., M.A., Newick House, Cheltenham
MullingS, John, Cirencester
Murrell, J., Gloucester
Nash. Rev. Canon R. S., M.A., Old Sodbury, Chipping Sodbury
Needham, Frederick, M.D.. Barnwood House. Gloucester
* New, Herbert. Green Hill. Evesham
Norman, George, il Clarence Street, Cheltenham
Norris, Venerable Archdeacon, D.D., 3, Great George Street, Bristol
* Oakeley. Rev. W. Bagnall, M. A.. Newland, Coleford
Oakeley, Mrs. W. Bagnall, Newland. Coleford
O'Fflahertie, Rev. T. R., M.A.. Capel Vicarage, Dorking, Surrey
Oman, C. W. C, All Soul's College, Oxford
Owen, Rev. J. A., M.A., The Beeches, Cheltenham
Owen, Rev. Richard Trevor, M.A.. F.S.A., Llangedwyn, Oswestry, Salop
Palmer, Rev. Feilding, M. A., Eastcliffe, Chepstow
Parker, Rev. Canon Charles J., M. A., Cathedral House, Gloucester
Pass, Alfred. 15, Upper Belgrave Road, Durdharn Down, Bristol
* Paul, Alfred H., The Close. Tetbury
Pearse, General G., C.B., Godfrey House, Cheltenham, c/o Messrs Grindlay
& Co., 55 Parliament Street, London
Pellew, F. L., Rodney House, Clifton
Perceval, Cecil H. Spencer. Henbury, Bristol
Percival. E. H.. Kimsbury House, Gloucester
* Perkins, Vincent R., Wotton-under-Edge
Peters, Rev. Thomas, 5, The Circus, Bath
Phillimore, W. P.W., M. A., B.C.L., IS Priory Road, Bedford Park
Chiswick, London
Philips, Miss, Hazelhurst, Ross
Philp, Gapt. J. Lamb, Pendoggett, Timsbury, Bath
Phillpotts, G. H. H. c/o Messrs Phillpott's & Co., Gloucester
Pitcairn, Rev. D. Lee, MA-, Monkton Combe Vicarage, Bath
Pitt, Theophilus, 143, Minories, London, E.C.
Playne, Arthur T., Longfords, Minchinhampton
Piatt, James, Somerset Villa, Gloucester
Ponting Albert, Sneedham Green, Upton St. Leonards, Gloucester
Vlll.
Ponting, C. E., F.S.A., Lockeridge, Marlborough, Wilts
* Pope, T. S., 3 Unity Street. College Green, Bristol
Powell, His Honour Judge John Joseph, Q.C., The Lawn. Denmark Hill,
London. S.E.
Power, Edward, F.S.A., 16, Southwell Gardens. London, S.W.
Poynton, Rev. Francis John, M.A. , Kelston Rectory, Bath
* Prankerd, P. D., The Knoll, Sneyd Park, Bristol
Price, William P., D.L. Tibberton Court, Gloucester
Pritchard, J. E., Guy's Cliff. Sydenham Road, Bristol
Pritchard, Augustin, F.R.C.S., 4, Chesterfield Place. Clifton, Bristol
Pritchett, Charles Pigott, 5, Hillside, Cotham. Bristol
Protheroe, Frank, 11, Alfred Place West, Thurloe Square, London. S.W.
Pryce, Bruce, A. C, Abbeyholme, Overton Road, Cheltenham
Reed, J. H., 4 Swanbourne Villas, Cotham, Bristol
* Reynolds. John, Manor House, Redland, Bristol
Rice, The Honourable Maria Elizabeth Rice, Matson House, Gloucester
Robinson, Wm. Le Fleming, Hillesley House, Wotton-under-Edge
Rogers, William Frederick, Tetbury
Rogers, Lieut.-Col. R., Fern Clyffe, Battledown, Cheltenham
Rome, T., Charlton House, Charlton Kings, Cheltenham
* Royce, Rev. David, M.A., Nether Swell Vicarage, Stow-on-the-Wold
Sadler, G. W., Keynsham Villa, Cheltenham
Salmon, Lieut. Col. H. W., Tockington Manor, Almsbury, Gloucestershire
Saunders, Joshua, Sutton House, Clifton Down, Bristol
Science and Art Department, South Kensington Museum, London, S.W.
Scott, Charles, Lennox House, Spa, Gloucester
Selwyn, Rev. E. J., M.A., Pluckley Rectory, Ashford, Kent
Sessions, Frederick, Russell House, Gloucester
Sewell, Edward C, Elmlea, Stratton, Cirencester
Seys, Godfrey, Wirewood Green, Chepstow
Sibbald, J. G. E.. Accountant General's Office, Admiralty, London
Shaw, J. E., M.B., 11, Lansdown Place, Victoria Square, Clifton, Bristol
Shaw, Rev. George F. E., M.A., Edgeworth Rectory, Cirencester
Sherborne, Rt. Hon. Lord, 2, St. James' Place, London, S.W.
Shum, Frederick, F.S.A., 17 Norfolk Crescent, Bath
Simpson, J. J. , Lynwood, Cotham Gardens, Bristol
Skillicorne, W. Nash. 9, Queen's Parade, Cheltenham
Skrine, Henry Duncan, ciaverton Manor, Bath
Smith, T. Sherwood. F.S.S., The Pynes, Keynsham, Bristol
Smith, Thomas Somerville, M.D., Sittingbourne, Kent
Smith, Alfred Edward, The Hollies. Nailsworth
Smith, Richard Henry, Grigshot, near Stroud
Smithe, Rev. F., L.L.D., Churchdown Vicarage, Gloucester
Smyth, Rev. Christopher, Bussage Vicarage, Stroud
Smyth, Col., Theescombe House, Stroud
Society of Merchant Venturers, Bristol
Sommerville, William, Bitton Hill, near Bristol
Stackhouse, Rev. J. Lett, The Chantry, Berkeley
Stanton, Charles Holbrow, M.A., 65, Redcliffe Gardens, London, S. W.
Stanton, Walter John, Cooper's Hill, Stroud
Stanton, J. Y., The Leaze, Stonehouse
Stanton, Rev. W. EL, M.A., Haselton Rectory, Cheltenham
Steevens, Lieut. Col., 1 Wolsley Terrace, Cheltenham
Stephens, Albert J., Clovelly, Wotton Hill, Gloucester
Stone, John, 12, Royal Crescent, Bath
Strickland, Edward, c/o 13 Victoria Square. Clifton
Strickland, Algernon, Apperley Court, Tewkesbury
IX.
Swayne, Joseph Griffiths. M.D.. 74. Pembroke Road, Clifton. Bristol
Swayne, Miss, 129, Pembroke Road, Clifton. Bristol
* Swayne, S. H.. 129, Pembroke Road. Clifton. Bristol
Symonds, Rev. W., M.A., Frocester Vicarage, Stonehouse, Glos.
Tait, C. W. A.. M.A., College Gate. Clifton College. Clifton. Bristol
Tagart, Francis, F.L.S., F.R.G.S., old Sneyd Park. Bristol
* Taylor, John. Bristol City Librarian, 37, Clyde Road, Bristol
Taylor, Rev- C S., M-A , 1, Guinea Street. Redcliffe, Bristol
* Taylor, Robert, Edge House. Stroud
Thomas, Arnold. Severn Bank, Xewnham
* Thomas, Christopher James, Drayton Lodge. Durdham Park, Bristol
Thompson. Rev. H. L., M.A.. Radley College, Abingdon, Berks.
Thursby, Piers, Broadwell Hill, Stow-on-the-Wold
Tomes. R. F.. South House, Littleton, Evesham
Townsend. Charles, Avenue House. Gotham Park. Bristol
Trenfleld. J. D. B., Hill House. Chipping Sodbary
Trinder, Edward. Perrots' Brook, Cirencester
Trusted, Charles J., Sussex House. Pembroke Road, Clifton
Tuckett, Francis Fox, F.R.G.S., Frenchay, Bristol
Tuckett, Frank C, 2 Osborne Road, Clifton
Tuckett, Richard G. 4 Exchange Buildings, East, Bristol
Tudway, Clement, Cecily Hill, Cirencester
Turner, A. M. Sydney, Barton Street, Gloucester
Turner. T.
Twells, The Right Rev. Bishop, D.D., Pembroke Gate, Clifton, Bristol
Vansittart, Hon. Mrs. 11, Lypiatt Terrace, Cheltenham
* Vassar-Smith, R. Vassar, Charlton Park, Cheltenham
Viner, Rev. A. W. Ellis. B.A., Badgeworth Vicarage, Cheltenham
Vizard, Major Gen., Enderby House, Dursley
Waddingham, John, Guiting Grange, Winchcombe
Wadlry, Rev. T. P., M.A., Naunton Beauchamp Rectory, Pershore, Hon.
Member
Waldy, Rev. J. E., B.A., Claverton Rectory, Bath
Walker, General Sir C. P. Beauchamp, K.C.B., 97, Onslow Square,
London. S.W.
Walker, C. B., Wotton. Gloucester
* Waller. Frederick S., F.R.I.B.A., 18, College Green, Gloucester
Walsh, Mrs, Sudgrove House, near Cirencester
Warren, Robert Hall. Sunnyside. Apsley Road. Clifton. Bristol
Wasbrough. H. S., 7, Gloucester Row. Clifton. Bristol
Webb, R. B. , Down House. Ashley Down, Bristol
Wenden, James Gordon, Dursley
Weston, Sir J. D., Dorset House, Clifton. Bristol
Weston, John, 5, All Saints Road, Clifton
Wethered, Charles, West Grange. Stroud
Wethered, Joseph. Heatherfield, The Avenue, Clifton, Bristol
Wheeler, A. C. Upton Hill. Gloucester
Whitwill. Mark. The Shrubbery. Weston-Super-Mare
* Wiggin, Rev. William. M.A.. Hampnett Rectory, Northleach
Williams, Rev. Augustin. Todenham Rectory, Moreton-in-Marsh
* Williams, John, 16. Alma Road. Clifton. Bristol
Willis, Capt. H., Glenfall, Charlton Kings. Cheltenham
Wills, Frederick. Heath Lodge. Hampstead Heath. London, N.W.
Wingfield, E. Rhys, Barrington Park. Burford
Wintle, Charles, Queen Square. Bristol
Winwood, Rev. H. H., M.A., FGS , 11, Cavendish Crescent, Bath
Wiseman, Eev. H. J., M.A., Clifton College, Clifton. Bristol
* Witchell, Charles A., The Acre, Stroud
Witchell, E. Northam, The Acre, Stroud
* Witts, G-. B., C.E., Hill House. Leckhampton. Cheltenham
* Witts, Rev. F. E. Broome, M.A., Upper Slaughter, Bourton-on-the- Water
R.S.O.
Wood, Walter B., Denmark Road, Gloucester
Woodward. J. H., 2, Windsor Terrace, Clifton, Bristol
Wright, J., Stonebridge, Bristol
Yabbicom. Thomas Henry, C.E., 23, Oakfield Road, Clifton, Bristol
Yatman, William Hamilton Highgrove, Tetbury
Zachary, Henry, Cirencester
Literary Societies, exchanging Transactions with this Society—
The Society of Antiquaries of Newcastle, The Castle, Newcastle-on-Tyne
The Society of Antiquaries of London, Burlington House, Piccadilly,
London, W.
The Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, Royal Institution, Edinburgh
The Royal Archaeological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, Oxford
Mansions, Oxford Street, London, W.
The British Archaeological Association, 32, Sackville Street, London
The Birmingham & Midland Institute, Archaeological Section
The Clifton Antiquarian Club, Hon. Sec. A. E. Hudd, Esq., 94, Pembroke
Road, Clifton, Bristol.
The Cambrian Archaeological Society, Hon. Sec, Rev. R. Trevor Owen,
M.A. . F.S.A., Llangedwyn, Oswestry. Salop
The Cotteswold Field Club, Hon. Sec, Edward Wethered. Esq., 5, Berkeley
Place, Cheltenham
The Royal Institution of Cornwall, Museum, Truro, Cornwall
The Royal Society of Antiquaries, (Ireland) Dublin
The Derbyshire Archaeological and Natural History Society, Derby
The Essex Archaeological Society, Colchester, Essex
The Kent Archaeological Society, Museum, Maidstone, Kent
The Powys Land Club, Museum and Library. Welshpool
The Somerset Archaeological and Natural History Society, The Castle,
Taunton
The Suffolk Institute of Archaeology and Natural History, Hon. Sec. The
Rev. F. Haslewood, F.S.A., S. Matthew's Rectory, Ipswich, Suffolk
The Sussex Archaeological Society, Lewes, Sussex
The William Salt Archaeological Society, Stafford. Hon. Sec Major Gen.
The Hon. G. Wrottesley
The Wiltshire Archaeological and Natural History Society. Devizes, Wilts
The Yorkshire Archaeological and Topographical Association, Hon. Sec.
G. W. Tomlinson, Esq., F.S.A., The Elms, Huddersfield
XI.
TEEMS OF ADMISSION TO THE SOCIETY.
Those who are desirous of joining the Society, can be admitted, after
election by the Council, on the following conditions :
I. As Life Members, for a Composition of £5 5s., and an Admission
Fee of 10s. 6d. which will entitle them to receive gratuitously
for life, the annual volumes of Transactions of the Society that
may be issued after the date of payment.
II. As Annual Members, upon payment of 10s. fid. Entrance Fee, and
an annual subscription of 10s. 6d., which will entitle them to
receive gratuitously, the annual volumes of Transactions for
every year for which their subscriptions are paid.
The annual subscription becomes due on the 22nd of April, and the
Treasurer. Mr. Eknest Hartland, will be obliged if mem-
bers will send their subscriptions to him at Hardwicke Court,
Chepstow. Subscriptions may also be made payable on the
22nd of April in each year, through Members' Bankers to the
Treasurer at the County of Gloucester Bank, Gloucester.
By order of Council, the Transactions of the Society are only issued
to those Members who have paid their subscriptions for the
corresponding year.
Application for admission as Members to be made to the Rev. W.
Bazeley, M.A., Matson Rectory. Gloucester. Honorary Secretary.
GETTY CENTER L
BRARY
Wsm
$m
w&
60?
m
wm
mm
Basil?
EB&8^&
mk
m
W&
mm
T&r&pi.
'•'
mm
w&
m
m
1
V*U
VM