Skip to main content

Full text of "Two discourses on the subject of the war between the U. States and Mexico : preached in the Second Presbyterian Church, in Springfield, on Sabbath, 11th July, 1847"

See other formats


i 


THE  WAR  BETWEEN  THE  U,  STATES  AND  MEXICO  ; 


"PREACHED  IN  THE  SECOND  PRESBYTERIAN  CHURCH,  IN  SPRINGFIELD, 


Sabbatli,  Utli  July,  184% 


B  1   j\  Ljbt.ii  L   HALE,  Pastor  of  the  Cnuuoxi. 


PUBLISHED  BY  REQUEST, 


SPRINGFIELD: 

PMNTED  AT  THE  OFFICE  OF  THE  SANGAMO  JOURNAL— AUGUST,  1847. 


Rev.  Mr.  Hale, 

Dear  Sir,— -The  sermons  delivered  by  you  on  the  11th  July,  in  pursuance  of  the  recommendation  of 
the  General  Assembly  of  the  Presbyterian  Church,  on  the  existing  war  between  this  country  and  Mexico, 
having  been  made  the  subject  of  extraordinary  debate  and  action  in  the  Constitutional  Convention,  now 
in  session  in  this  city,  we  request  of  you  a  copy  of  said  sermons  for  publicationj  that  all  who  feel  an 
interest  in  the  matter  may  be  able  to  form  a  correct  opinion. 

SILAS  W.  ROBBINS, 
JOSEPH  THAYER, 
BENJAMIN  S.  EDWARDS, 
E.  B.  PEASE, 
E.  R.  WILEY, 
J.  L.  LAMB, 
W.  DILLARD. 

Springfield,  August  10,  1847. 

We  deem  it  proper  to  append  the  following  statement  of  facts,  for  the  reasons  which  have  induced 
us  to  ask  for  the  publication  of  these  sermons : 

On  Monday,  the  12th  July,  Mr.  G.  W.  Akin,  delegate  from  Franklin  county,  introduced  the  following 
in  the  Convention : 

"Whereas,  Mr.  Hale,  in  a  sermon  on  the  11th  day  of  July,  in  the  2d  Presbyterian  Church,  denounced 
the  existing  war  with  Mexico,  as  being  unjustj  and  whereas,  such  declarations  ought  not  to  be  tolerated, 
more  especially  in  a  republican  government;  and  whereas,  it  is  unbecoming  a  minister  of  the  gospel  to 
use  such  language  in  a  gospel  sermon,  or  before  the  young  and  rising  generation  ;  therefore, 

"Resolved,  That  said  Mr.  Hale  be  excused  from  holding  prayers  in  this  Convention  for  the  future." 

Mr.  Thompson  Campbell,  of  Jo  Daviess,  moved  "that  the  Rev.  Mr.  Hale  be  excused  in  future  from  pray- 
ing in  this  Convention." 

After  considerable  debate,  these  resolutions  were  laid  ©n  the  table. 

On  Monday  morning,  July  19th,  Mr.  Hale  being  about  to  open  the  session  of  the  Convention  with 
prayer,  as  requested,  was,  during  the  ceremony,  interrupted  by  hissing  and  clapping  of  hands,  by  Mr. 
Akin,  the  member  from  Franklin,  who  then  left  the  hall. 

After  Mr.  Hale  had  concluded  his  prayer,  he  left  the  hall,  and  was  retiring  from  the  Capitol,  when 
Mr.  Akin  took  occasion  to  insult  him,  by  saying  to  him  that  "if  he  did  not  wish  to  be  hurt,  he  must  not 
come  there  again." 

The  next  day,  on  motion  of  Mr.  Knapp,  of  Jersey,  the  following  preamble  and  resolution  were 
adopted  by  the  Convention,  viz  : 

"  Whereas,  a  respectable  minister  of  the  gospel,  whilst  attending  the  Convention  to  open  the  session 
by  prayer,  under  the  resolution  of  the  Convention,  has  been  grossly  insulted  and  menaced  with  bodily 
injury,  by  a  member  of  the  Convention ;  and  whereas,  it  is  alike  due  to  the  Convention  and  the  ministers, 
that  we  should  not  invite  them  to  perform  that  duty  unless  we  could  secure  them  against  such  indigni> 
ties ;  therefore, 

"  Resolved,  That  the  resolution,  inviting  the  clergymen  of  Springfield  to  open  the  sessions  of  the  Con- 
vention with  prayer,  be  rescinded ;  and  that  the  secretary  inform  the  said  clergymen  of  the  same,  with 
the  assurance  of  the  Convention  tliat  this  step  is  not  adopted  from  any  dissatisfaction  of  the  manner  in 
which  they  have  discharged  their  sacred  duty,  but  solely  from  an  unwillingness  to  subject  them  to  the 
repetition  of  such  indignities." 

That  portion  of  the  above  preamble,  implying  that  the  Convention  could  not  protect  clergymen  from 
insult  while  attending  to  open  their  sessions  with  prayer,  having  been  rescinded,  the  preamble  and 
resolution  were  adopted.  ^ 

Believing  that  these  facts  form  an  instance  of  official  interference  with  the  freedom  of  speech,  and 
of  religious  discussion  and  belief,  which  is  totally  at  variance  with  our  free  institutions,  we  have 
deemed  it  proper  to  make  them  public,  in  connection  witli  the  sermons  which  gave  rise  to  them,  that 
the  community  may  be  able  to  form  a  correct  opinion  in  the  case. 


The  following  discourses  were  prepared;  and  preached,  agreeably  to  a  request  of  the  Gene- 
ral Assembly  of  the  Presbyterian  Church.  The  same  resolution,  substantially,  inviting  the 
ministers  and  churches  to  observe  the  2d  Sabbath  in  July  as  a  day  of  humiliation  and  prayer,  on 
account  of  the  existing  war  with  Mexico,  and  to  supplicate  the  speedy  return  of  peace,  was 
passed  by  the  General  Assembly  of  each  branch  of  the  Presbyterian  Church  in  the  United  States. 

For  the  sentiments  advanced  in  the  discourses,  no  General  Assembly  or  other  ecclesiastical 
bodyj  or  church,  is  responsible.  Whether  the  sentiments  are  true,  and  in  accordance  with  the 
teaching  and  spirit  of  the  gospel  and  its  glorious  Author  j  and  whether  the  preaching  of  them, 
at  the  time  and  under  the  circumstances,  was  wise  and  a  duty  ;  are  matters  for  which  the  writer 
expects  to  answer  at  the  tribunal  of  conscience  and  of  God. 

The  author  belongs  to  no  political  party  whatever.  No  political  party,  as  such,  now  in  ex- 
istence, maintains  such  sentiments.  They  were  preached  on  the  Sabbath  day,  as  gospel  truth. 
To  the  gospel — and  to  that  alone — is  the  reader  referred,  as  the  unerring  standard  by  which 
they  are  to  be  tried.    If,  by  that  standard,  they  are  approved,  the  author  will  be  satisfied. 

It  is  proper  to  state  that  the  second  discourse  was,  as  delivered,  to  a  great  extent,  extempore; 
and  has  been  written  out  since.  A  portion  of  it,  which  was  omitted  in  the  preaching  for  want 
of  time,  is  retained  in  print.  The  passage  which,  by  being  misunderstood,  gave  special  offense, 
is  given  almost  verbatim  as  delivered.  The  slight  verbal  changes  only  give  the  statements  more 
clearness  and  intensity. 


SERMONS. 


James  4:  1. — From  tvhence  come  wars  and  fightings  among  you  ?  Come  they  not 
hence,  even  of  your  lusts  which  war  in  your  members  ? 

It  is  not  purpose  to  inquire  whether  the  aposile,  in  this  text,  refers  to  wars  bc" 
tween  stales  and  nations,  or  to  the  contests  which  early  arose  between  different  portions 
of  the  church  of  God.  J\Iy  purpose  is  to  address  you,  on  this  occasion,  on  the  general 
subject  of  war,  its  causes,  and  its  essential  injustice  and  iniquity. 

I.  What  is  a  war?  War  is  an  armed  contest  to  settle  a  disputed  question  of  right. 
In  the  language  of  another* — incomparably  the  best  living  writer,  on  the  subject — 
*«  War  is  a  public,  armed  contest,  between  nations,  in  order  to  establish  justice  be- 
tween them." 

Lord  Bacon  calls  war  "one  of  the  highest  trials  of  right,  when  princes  and  states 
put  themselves  upon  the  justice  of  God  for  the  deciding  of  their  controversies,  by  such 
success  as  it  shall  please  him  to  give  on  either  side."  Which,  considering  the  nature 
of  the  means  employed  to  conduct  this  "  highest  trial  of  right"  to  issue,  is  about  the 
same  as  the  old  adage,  "  might  gives  right." 

Now,  whatever  may  be  said  of  a  portion  of  ancient  warS' — many  of  which  were 
little  better  than  open  piracies,  with  scarcely  the  poor  and  pitiful  pretence  that  accom- 
panies a  modern  war — all  modern  wars,  between  what  are  termed  christian  nations, 
are  included  in  the  definition  just  given.  Any  war  waged  between  civilized  nations, 
for  the  last  thousand  years,  will  perfectly  illustrate  it.  The  wars  of  Bonaparte,  which 
even  he  declares  were  wars  of  defense;  the  wars  of  England  with  China,  and  the  East 
generally,  were  wars  in  which  those  who  waged  them  claimed  something,  as  a  right, 
which  their  enemies  refused  to  yield.  The  war  declared  by  America  against  England, 
in  1812,  was  to  settle  the  disputed  right  of  the  British  to  search  our  vessels. 

The  war  threatened  between  this  country  and  England,  in  reference  to  the  boundariea 
of  Maine  and  Oregon,  had  we  gone  to  vvar,  would  have  been  to  settle,  by  an  armed  con- 
test between  the  two  nations,  this  disputed  question  of  right. 

.  It  is  called  an  appeal  to  arms  ;  an  appeal  to  the  sword  ;  an  appeal  to  the  God  of  bat- 
tles. The  language  is  of  common  U3e  in  courts;  implying  that  other  means  had  been 
resorted  to,  in  vain,  to  establish  justice  between  the  contending  parties. 

In  this  view  of  the  nature  of  war,  there  is  little  room  for  dispute  on  the  subject  of 
wars  usually  styled  'defensive  as  the  only  question  is,  with  what  kind  and  degree  of 
occasion,  and  excuse  for  it,  a  nation  may  make  this  appeal  to  "  the  last  reason  of  kings." 

Those  who  resort  to  war,  as  a  means  of  settling  disputed  questions  between  nations, 
commonly  endeavor  to  show  that  it  is  occasioned  by  the  injustice  and  violence  of  their 
enemies — that  it  is  a  war  of  defense.  In  every  such  instiument  as  a  declaration  of  war, 
you  will  find  set  forth  the  insults  received  ;  the  evils  threatened  ;  the  rights  invaded;  tho 
justice  demanded;  and,  perhaps,  the  war  actually  raging.  And  then,  with  these  things 
as  their  justification,  they  appeal  to  force — to  arms — to  violence — to  settle  the  question 
of  right,  and  establisli  justice  between  them  and  their  enemies. 


•  Sumnor. 


6 


Such  is  war — nil  war — waged  by  civilized  nations.  The  view  is  somewhat  abstract, 
but  true  to  ihe  nature  of  the  subject.  It  is  bringing  the  physical  power  of  two  or  more 
nations  into  fearful  collision  for  the  wasting  of  their  treasures,  their  resources,  their  vir- 
tue, their  happiness  and  their  life  blood;  till  by  the  awful  preponderance  of  power  on 
the  one  hand,  and  destruction  on  the  other,  the  mysterious  balance  rises,  and  the  ques- 
tion of  right  is  decided  ! 

It  is  the  same  in  its  nature  as  the  judicial  combats  which  originated  in  Germany,  in 
the  dark  ages,  where  one  of  the  parties  challenged  the  other;  and,  instead  of  a  judicial 
investigation,  the  parties  fought  in  the  presence  of  the  court,  and  by  "might,"  and  not 
by  reason  and  truth,  they  established  ^ws^/ce  between  the  litigants.  This  custom  pre'- 
vailed  long  and  extensively  in  France  and  England;  the  law  for  which,  in  the  latter 
country,  was  not  repealed  till  the  year  1817. 

It  is  the  same  sort  of  an  affray  between  nations  as  a  duel  between  individuals;  and  is 
so  much  the  greater  evil  and  crime  as  the  power  brought  into  action  is  greater,  the  in* 
terests  concerned  more  important  and  diversified,  the  dangers  more  appalling,  and  the 
evils,  in  all  respects,  more  overwhelming.  The  one  is  an  individual  evil,  danger,  crime, 
with  its  attendants  and  consequences;  the  other  is  national,  and,  in  all  its  relations  and 
consequences,  is  on  the  scale  of  nations. 

II.    Let  us  notice  the  causes  of  war  : 

1.  The  text  informs  us  that  the  origin,  the  causes  of  war,  are  to  be  found  in  the  cor- 
rupt passions  of  human  nature  :  Come  they  not  hence,  even  of  your  lusts  which  war 
in  your  members  ?" 

Our  regrets  at  the  sad  issues  of  events  are  often  alleviated  by  the  reflection  that  they 
were  the  product  of  important  aud  worthy  causes.  The  friend  of  man,  whose  premature 
death  we  mourn,  as  the  result  of  severe  toil  and  exposure,  to  relieve  his  suffering  fellow 
men,  furnishes  us  the  deppest  consolation  in  the  thought  that  he  wasted  the  energies  of 
life  in  deeds  of  humanity;  but  in  surveying  the  causes  of  war,  as  they  are  traced  by  the 
historian,  we  are  cheered  by  no  such  consolations.  The  most  trivial  and  insignificant 
as  well  as  the  most  unworthy  causes,  have  given  rise  to  the  wars  of  mankind. 

According  to  Prof.  Upham,  the  wars  of  civilized  nations  since  the  spread  of  ChriS" 
tianity,  or  since  the  time  of  Constantino,  amount  to  286  wars  ;  at  this  time,  to  more 
than  290.  In  this  statement,  a  vast  number  of  petty  wars  between  small  nations  of 
antiquity,  temporary  insurrections,  and  a  large  number  of  wars  between  christians  and 
savages,  are  omitted. 

Of  the  286  wars,  mentioned  above,  whose  causes  were  inquired  into  by  some  of  the 
most  competent  minds  in  the  land,  44  were  strictly  wars  of  ambition;  22  wars  of  plun- 
der ^  tribute,  &c.;  24  wars  of  retaliation  and  revenge;  8  wars  to  settle  some  question  of 
honor  or  prerogative;  6  wars  arising  from  disputed  claims  to  territory;  41  wars  arising 
fronf  disputed  titles  to  crowns ^  to  settle  the  mighty  question  which  of  two  despots  should 
crush  the  millions  of  their  abject  and  oppressed  subjects; — 30  wars  commenced  under 
pretence  of  aiding  an  ally;  23  wars  originating  in  jealousy  of  rival  greatness;  5  wars 
have  grown  out  of  commerce;  55  civil  wars;  28  wars  on  account  of  religion,  including 
the  crusades  against  the  Turks  and  heretics. 

A  very  large  portion  of  these  wars,  it  can  be  seen  at  a  glance,  are  the  product  of 
avarice;  others,  of  pride,  ambition  and  revenge.  There  is  not  a  war  among  them  all 
but  has  originated  in  passions,  the  indulgence  of  which  is  opposed  to  the  will  of  God, 
destructive  of  human  virtue,  and  plainly  prohibited  in  the  sacred  scriptures. 

Even  admitting  that  war  under  some  peculiar  circumstances  might  be  justified,  the 
causes  of  the  wars  which  have  been  waged  by  civilized  nations  are  such  as  condemn 
them;  not  merely  because  they  were  impolitic,  but  because  they  were  inhuman  and  im- 
mensely wicked.  Flow  trivial,  for  instance,  must  the  causes  of  ihoso  wars  appear,  in 
which  tens  of  thousands  of  human  beings  have  been  hurried  into  eternity,  amidst  all 
the  horrors  of  the  camp  and  the  battle-field,  merely  because  rival  princes  or  rival  gov- 
j    ernmonts  could  not,  or  rather  would  not,  ngree  as  to  the  division  of  their  power,  or  terri- 


7 


tory  ?  It  is  a  fact  of  accredited  history,  that  two  states  of  southern  Europe*  werc  em- 
broiled in  a  long  and  bloody  war,  in  consequence  of  some  soldiers  of  the  state  running 
away  with  a  bucket  belonging  to  a  public  well.  A  distinguished  foreign  writer  has 
given  an  account  of  a  dispute  about  the  making  of  a  pair  of  gloves,  in  which  a  royal 
•personage  was  engaged,  and  which  had  the  effect  to  change  the  aspect  of  affairs  in  all 
Europe. 

The  sarcastic  language  of  Dean  Swift  is  none  too  strong,  v^rhen  he  remarks  that 
"  sometimes  a  war  between  two  princes  is  to  decide  which  of  them  shall  dispossess  a 
third  of  his  dominions,  whereto  neither  of  them  pretend  to  any  right;'*  (one  can  scarcely 
read  this  passage  without  thinking  of  unhappy,  injured  Poland,  whose  life  was  quenched 
in  blood — a  sacrifice  to  the  selfish  and  malignant  passions  of  surrounding  despots) — 
»'  sometimes  one  prince  quarreleth  with  another  for  fear  the  other  should  quarrel  with 
him.  Sometimes  a  war  is  entered  upon  because  an  enemy  is  too  strong — (in  the  plau- 
sible modern  language  of  ambition  and  lust  of  dominion^  *  to  preserve  the  balance  of 
power.')  Sometimes,  because  he  is  too  weak.  Sometimes  our  neighbors  want  the 
things  we  have,  or  have  the  things  we  want;  and  we  both  fight  till  they  take  ours  [or 
give  theirs." 

Nor  should  it  ever  be  forgotten  that  the  causes  of  war  lie  in  one,  or  at  most,  in  a  very 
few  minds.  The  nation  itself — the  great  mass  of  the  people — seldom  plunges  itself 
into  a  war  of  its  own  choice.  It  is  the  work  of  their  rulers,  and  the  demagogues,  and 
the  speculators,  who  expect  to  grow  rich  by  its  chances  and  its  spoils.  Nor  is  it  always 
the  easiest  part  of  the  work,  when  the  war  is  actually  begun,  to  stimulate  the  people  to 
the  deeds  of  cruelty  and  death  which  arc  the  inevitable  result,  and  the  common  work, 
of  war. 

t'*  We  are  shocked  to  read  that  Louis  XIV.  gave  orders  to  lay  waste  the  whole  Pala- 
tinate, a  beautiful  countrj^m  the  heart  of  Europe.  He  signed  the  order,  says  Vol- 
taire, at  his  palace  in  Versailles,  '  because  he  saw  nothing  in  such  a  command  but  his 
own  power  and  the  unhappy  right  of  war.  Thus  it  is,'  he  continues,  «  rulers,  in  the 
midst  of  abundance  drawn  from  the  toil  of  the  people,  and  surrounded  by  the  allure- 
ments of  festival  and  song,  by  a  mere  dash  of  the  pen,  have  crushed  innumerable 
hearts,  and  sent  the  deepest  sorrow  and  desolation  into  the  innumerable  dwellings  of 
their  people.' " 

III.    But  we  are  to  notice,  in  the  third  place,  the  essential  iniquity  of  war. 

Il  may  here  be  asked,  is  it  ever  right  for  nations  to  attempt  to  settle  their  disputes  by 
an  appeal  to  the  sword  1  Is  war  ever  to  be  justified  1  I  reply  that,  when  God  reveals 
his  will  to  any  people,  and  commands  them  to  go  to  war,  then  it  is  right,  as  in  all  other 
cases  of  unusual  and  specific  requirement,  to  go  to  war.  It  is  only  saying  that  men 
should  obey  the  will  of  God,  clearly  made  known  to  them.  It  is  on  this  ground  alone 
that  we  justify  the  wars  of  the  conquest  of  Canaan,  and  certain  other  wars  (not  all) 
named  in  the  Old  Testament.  He  who  knows  how  and  when  to  employ  storms,  earth- 
quakes and  volcanoes;  famine,  pestilence  and  death,  as  agents  to  execute  His  judgments 
on  mankind,  can  tell  when  it  is  riffht  for  Him  to  open  the  gates  of  war,  to  let  loose 
its  furies.  But  for  man,  weak,  and  short-sighted — with  his  reason  clouded  by  selfish- 
ness and  ambition — to  presume  to  do  it,  without  the  clear^  revelation  of  the  will  of 
heaven,  is  to  arrogate  to  himself  a  degree  of  knowledge,  of  wisdom,  and  impartial 
benevolence,  truly  prodigious ! 

In  reference  then  to  all  wars  which  God  has  not  authorized,  by  revealing  his  will 
distinctly  in  favor  of  waging  them,  I  answer,  they  are  crime  on  the  largest  scale;  and 
no  friend  of  God  and  man,  >viih  a  mind  and  conscience  properly  enlightened  by  the  gos- 
pel, can  fail  to  oppose  them  and  seek  their  removal. 

The  ground  taken  by  the  early  christians  generally  (not  universally),  is  the  only  true 
ground  on  which  christian  men  can  consistently  stand,  viz:  "Christianity  is  opposed 


*  Bologna  and  Modena. 


t  Upham. 


8 


to  war,  therefore  we  do  not  fight."  "  Christ  is  the  Prince  of  Peace,''  *'  His  kingdom 
is  not  of  the  world;  it  is  the  reign  of  love;  therefore  his  servants  do  not  fight."' 

If  it  be  said  that  the  Old  Testament  is  a  part  of  the  revealed  will  of  God,  and  that 
it  IS  pervaded  with  the  sentinments  and  the  spirit  of  the  war,  it  is  enough  to  reply, 

(1.)  This  may  all  be  accounted  for  on  the  ground  of  the  well-known  peculiarities  of 
that  age  and  that  dispensation,  while  the  moral  principles  of  the  Old  Testannent  are 
identical  with  those  of  the  New,  and  demand  universal  and  impartial  benevolence  be- 
tween nations  and  individuals,  and  thus  would  utterly  remove  all  wars  from  among 
men,  by  preventing  the  adoption  of  its  principles,  and  the  exercise  of  its  spirit ,  but, 

(2  )  It  is  from  the  Old  Testament  we  have  announced,  in  prophecy,  the  coming  of 
another  dispensaiion,  in  the  midst  of  which  we  are  living,  which  was  to  introduce  a 
universal  peace  among  the  nations;  when  men,  under  the  influence  of  the  gospel,  would 
lay  aside  the  arts  of  war — would  beat  their  swords  into  ploughshares  and  their  spears 
into  pruning-hooks,  and  learn  war  no  more. 

(3.)  The  teachings  of  Christ  and  his  apostles  are  diametrically  opposed  to  war;  and 
no  man  can  receive  them  to  his  heart,  with  a  mind  and  conscience  duly  enlightened, 
and  still  go  to  war  ;  for, 

1.  The  gospel  utterly  forbids  the  indulgence  of  those  passions  which  are  universally 
the  Cause  of  war;  such  as  pride,  envy,  vanity,  hatred,  avarice,  ambition,  partiality, 
prejudice,  suspicion,  and  every  other  passion  out  of  which  wars  always  arise.  If? 
therefore,  the  gospel  is  obeyed,  a  war  becomes  impossible.  Christianity  prevents  it,  by 
removing  the  causes  of  war ;  just  so  far  as  the  spirit  of  Christ  prevails,  (and  without  it 
we  are  none  of  his.)  wars  are  prevented  by  removing  all  the  causes  of  war. 

2.  The  law  of  Christianity — which  is  the  law  of  God,  and  binding  on  all  men — 
treats  men  as  belonging  to  one  family;  commands  all  men  to  love  each  other  as  they 
love  themselves.  That  law  allows  no  distinction  of  age,  nation,  language,  clime,  color, 
profession  or  pursuit,  to  repeal  or  modify  the  obligation  to  love,  and  only  lovo,  every  in« 
dividual  of  the  human  race,  with  the  sincerest  regard  to  all  their  real  interests  and 
rights,  personal,  domestic,  social,  public,  temporal  and  spiritual.  The  law  of  Christ 
allows  no  circumstance  of  insult,  irritation,  injustice,  provocation;  no  criminal  act  of 
any  kind,  on  the  part  ot  others,  to  set  us  free  from  its  obligation.  Its  design  is  to  pro* 
tect  the  rights,  the  virtue,  the  happiness  of  all  the  race;  by  forbidding  to  each  individ- 
ual whatsoever  would  sacrifice  either,  and  by  requiring  in  each  individual  all  those  prin- 
ciples, dispositions  and  acts,  which  will,  according  to  truth,  promote  every  real  interest 
of  every  fellow-being  in  the  universe;  so  that  the  rights,  privileges,  virtue,  and  interests 
of  every  kind,  can  never  be  invaded,  even  temporarily,  without  the  violation  of  this  law 
on  the  part  of  some  one,  never  utterly  sacrificed  without  his  own  violation  of  it. 

But  what  is  war,  in  its  relation  to  this  law  ]  I  reply,  it  is  not  merely  the  violation  of 
it;  it  is  virtually,  and  for  the  time,  its  repeal.  It  is  a  requisition,  on  the  part  of  a  hu- 
man government,  of  hatred  of  a  portion  of  the  human  family  whom  the  law  of  God  re- 
quires us  to  love.  It  is  a  requisition  to  destroy  that  life  which  the  law  of  God  requires 
us  to  save.  It  is  a  command  to  rob  the  aged  father  of  his  children — the  wife  of  her  hus- 
band— the  sister  of  her  brother — the  children  of  their  father; — and  to  do  this,  when  God 
never  required  it  in  the  execution  of  his  righteous  judgments;  but  forbade  it,  in  the  abun- 
dance of  his  mercy  and  hie  truth. 

It  is  a  command  to  sack — to  rob  and  burn — towns,  villages,  cities;  to  ravage  empires 
and  kingdoms;  and  to  murder,  send  into  captivity,  to  prison  and  to  bondage,  their  popu- 
lation indisciiminately. 

It  is  a  requirement,  by  state  authority,  to  storm  castles,  sink  ships,  destroy  commerce, 
and  put  an  end  to  all  peaceful  and  fraternal  intercourse  between  man  and  his  fellow- 
man  ! 

It  is  a  command  to  reduce  whole  communities  to  starvation  and  despair;  to  seize  upon 
their  property,  their  conveniences  and  privileges  of  every  description;  and,  if  they  cannot 
be  appropriated  to  ourselves,  to  suspend  their  use,  or  devote  them  wantonly  to  ruin.  In 


9 


a  word,  it  is  a  command  to  produce,  on  the  largest  possible  scale,  sorrow,  mourning,  pov- 
erty, vice,  wretchedness  and  deatii. 

If  it  is  said  these  things  are  done  on  account  of  crimes  committed,  and  to  establish 
justice,  then  let  the  man,  or  the  men,  who  caused  the  war,  be  sought  out,  their  guilt 
established,  and  due  punishment  inflicted;  and  no  christian  will  complain.  But  let  not 
the  ruthless  hand  of  indiscriminate  destruction  be  raised  over  whole  communities  of  men, 
convicted  of  no  fault,  merely  because  the  state  allows  it^ 

It  is  in  vaiu  to  say  these  things  are  done  by  public  authority,  and  individuals  are  not 
accountable.  Unless  the  passage  in  the  gospel  can  be  shown,  where  God  has  authorized 
man  to  hate  his  neighbor  on  account  of  the  state;  to  kill  his  fellow-men  when  his  country 
is  at  war;  to  burn,  destroy;  to  produce  misery,  sorrow,  and  death;  whenever  a  civil  ruler 
is  pleased  to  get  angry  enough,  or  be  insulted;  ambitious,  covetous,  proud,  or  revengeful 
enough,  to  issue  a  declaration  of  war, — we  must  still  be  allowed  to  think,  and  to  say, 
that  war  is  not  only  a  crime  against  God  and  man,  but  that  the  individual  acts  of  war- 
ring men  are  so  much  the  more  criminal  as  they  are,  by  public  authority  and  the  cif^ 
cumstances  of  the  case,  and  the  means  and  instruments  they  employ,  enabled  to  accom- 
plish a  much  larger  amount  of  evil  than  would  be  possible  to  them  without  these  helpa. 

Viewed,  then,  as  a  sort  of  repeal — a  universal  license  to  violate  the  law  of  God's 
kingdom — war  is  universally  wrong  and  wicked.  The  only  way  to  evade  this  conclusion 
is  to  assert,  that  what  is  crime  in  the  individual,  is  righteousness  in  the  nation.  Who- 
ever wishes  to  maintain  this  proposition,  let  him  do  it. 

3.  The  law  of  war  is  the  law  of  honor.  War  is  conceived  in  the  spirit  of  this  law; 
and  all  its  horrid  crimes  are  only  acts  of  obedience  to  its  precepts,  and  the  exhibitions 
of  its  spirit. 

By  this  code,  pride,  ambition  and  revenge,  are  virtues! — while  to  be  humble,  meek, 
and  self-denying,  is  to  be  mean  and  despicable. 

The  code  of  honor — of  war — requires  revenge  for  injuries  and  insults.  The  gospel 
requires  us  not  to  "avenge  ourselves;"  but  to  be  followers  of  Him  "  who  made  himself 
of  no  reputation,"  and  who  never  employed  violence  to  redress  his  wrongs. 

The  code  of  honor — of  war. — is  blow  for  blow;  insult  for  insult;  injury  for  injury. 
The  gospel  says  "  resist  not  evil;"  if  a  man  smile  thee  on  the  one  cheek,  turn  to  him 
the  other  also; — render  to  no  man  evil  for  evil,  or  railing  for  railing.  Being  reviled, 
revile  not  again;  but  commit  yourself  to  Him  who  judgeth  righteously.  "  Love  your 
enemies;  bless  them  that  curse  you;  bless,  and  curse  not."  But  1  need  not  pursue  this 
comparison.  The  fact  that  war  in  its  origin,  and  iis  acts,  is  only  so  much  obedience  to 
the  law  of  honor — is  the  most  perfect  proof  that  it  is  essential  crime  and  iniquity  in  the 
view  of  God.  If  among  devils  and  damned  spirits  there  are  moral  regulations,  they 
doubtless  are  "summarily  comprehended  "  in  the  code  of  honor. 

4.  The  precious  interests  war  inevitably  sacrifices,  indicate  its  deeply  criminal  na-. 
ture  and  tendencies.  These  will  be  more  fully  noticed  in  the  following  discourse,  on 
the  particular  war  in  which  this  nation  is  involved. 

I  close  this  discourse,  with  a  smgle  reflection: — the  existence  of  war  is  reason  for 
deep  humiliation  before  God. 


Mat.  26:  8. — To  what  purpose  is  this  loaste  1 

I  HAVE  no  pleasure  in  speaking  of  the  war  between  the  United  States  and  Mexico. 
I  have  ever  avoided  all  public  mention  of  it,  only  as  duty  has  seemed  to  demand  it. 
The  whole  subject,  in  all  its  bearings  and  relations,  is  fraught  with  the  deepest  sorrow 
and  woe. 

I  am  quite  aware,  too,  of  the  prejudice  against  a  minister  of  Christ,  who,  fearlessly 
and  honestly,  speaks  the  truth  against  tho  acta  of  the  govornmcnt,  and  the  policy  of  our 
2 


10 


public  men.  The  power  of  party  pride  and  intolerance  is  very  great,  and  a  lover  of 
peace  might  well  desire  to  avoid  all  collision  with  it.  A  political  friend  of  the  present 
administration  recently  complained,  on  the  floor  of  Congress,  that  "  the  religious  senti- 
ment of  the  nation  had  been  invoked  against  the  war."  It  may  be  asked,  in  astonish- 
ment, what  that  religion  is,  that  needs  to  be  '« invoked,"  or  evoked  against  such  a  war  ? 

The  tone  of  the  political  press,  too,  on  this  subject,  is  sufficiently  threatening  ;  not  a 
few,  through  this  channel,  taking  the  ground  that  it  is  equivalent  to  treason  to  denounce 
the  war  with  Mexico — together  with  the  measures  which  originated  it,  and  the  men  who 
brought  it  about  and  carry  it  on.  But  the  feelings  of  men,  and  the  tone  and  spirit  of 
the  press,  can  be  no  rule  of  speech  or  action  for  the  servant  of  Christ.  I  am  not  here 
as  a  politician,  and  if  I  were,  it  would  not  change  my  views  of  the  impolicy  and  injus- 
tice of  this  war ;  but  as  the  humble  servant  of  Him  who  was  hated  of  the  world,  be- 
cause  He  testified  that  its  works  were  evil. 

In  seeking  the  occasions  of  humiliation  before  God,  on  account  of  the  war  between 
this  Republic  and  Mexico,  let  us,  as  suggested  in  the  text,  notice, 

f.     The  waste.    The  cost  of  the  war  with  Mexico,  and 

II.  The  reasons  why  it  is  waged.    The  causes  of  the  war,  and  the  reasons  of  its 

prosecution  ;  and, 

III.  The  occasion  for  humiliation  and  prayer  to  the  God  of  peace,  that  He  would 

stay  the  further  effusion  of  blood,  and  restore  peace  and  tranquillity  between 
the  two  nations. 
1.  The  waste.    The  cost  of  the  war  with  Mexico : 

1.  Its  cost  in  money.  As  this  is  the  least  valuable  of  all  the  items  of  cost,  it  shall 
first  demand  our  attention. 

The  amount  of  treasure  consumed  in  this  war  is  variously  estimated.  One,  on  whose 
intelligence  and  accurate  judgment  great  reliance  may  be  placed,  early  announced  that 
it  would  cost,  to  carry  on  the  war  with  Mexico,  a  half  million  of  dollars  per  day  ;  or 
more  than  180  millions  of  dollars  yer  year.  At  this  rate,  the  cost  is  now  to  our  nation 
more  than  200  millions  of  dollars. 

Another,  whose  accuracy  is  generally  to  be  relied  on,  estimates  the  cost,  up  to  this 
time,  at  100  to  200  millions — say  150  millions  of  dollars. 

Other  estimates  vary  from  50  millions  to  15(?  millions  of  dollars.  The  actual  cost  it 
is  at  this  time  impossible  to  ascertain;  nor  is  it  to  be  expected  that  the  whole  truth  will 
ever  be  fairly  laid  before  the  American  people.  I  doubt  whether  there  is  a  politician 
in  the  land,  who  is  a  friend  of  the  war,  who  would  risk  his  reputation  to  tell  the  whole 
truth  on  this  subject,  if  he  knew  it. 

In  any  view  of  it,  the  sum  wasted  is  immense;  amounting  to  from  five  to  ten  dollars, 
each,  for  every  man,  woman  and  child  in  this  nation. 

But  this  is  only  the  cost  to  our  own  government  and  people.  The  cost  and  losses 
occasioned  by  the  destruction  of  their  property,  to  the  MexicQ.ns,  is  not  likely  to  be  less 
than  our  own.  If  we  estimate  the  whole  sacrifice  of  money  and  property,  to  both  the 
United  States  and  Mexico,  to  the  present  time,  it  will  not  be  likely  to  fall  short  of 
400,000,000  dollars! 

But  this  is  not  all.  The  withdrawing  of  20,000  to  50,000  men,  all  able-bodied  and 
in  the  prime  of  life,  from  the  ranks  of  productive  industry,  and  causing  them  to  be- 
come  the  most  destructive  and  voracious  consumers,  adds  an  item  of  incalculable 
value  to  the  pecuniary  cost  of  the  war. 

Besides  this,  the  injury  done  to  commerce  and  the  business  of  the  country,  by  di- 
verting the  circulating  medium  from  its  accustomed  channels,  is  immense. 

Whether  these  estimates  are  correct  or  incorrect,  is  nothing  to  my  purpos%,  The 
whole  object  is  to  show,  by  referring  to  various  items  of  cost,  and  to  the  estimates 
made  of  them  by  others,  that  the  pecuniary  cost  of  the  war  is  immensely  great. 

2.  But  the  waste  of  treasure,  though  immense,  is  small,  when  compared  with  the 
sacrifice  of  human  life.    At  the  lowest  estimate,  10,000  Mexicans  and  5,000  Ameri- 


11 


cans  have  already  fallen,  and  are  numbered  with  the  dead.  Each  of  these  soldiers- 
was  connected,  as  we  all  are,  by  the  tender  ties  of  kindred,  love  and  friendship.  Each 
of  them  was  formed  by  his  Maker  for  all  the  high  ends  of  the  present  life,  and  of  a  fu- 
ture endless  existence.  Each  of  them  was  summoned  from  the  warm  embrace  of  fami- 
ly, and  the  claims  of  duty  in  peaceful  life.  Go,  survey  the  camp,  and  the  hospital, 
where  they  sickened,  suffered  and  died.  Gaze  on  their  torn,  shattered  carcasses,  and 
their  bones  bleacliing  in  the  sun.  Count  their  graves;  and  as  you  muse  silently  in  these 
scenes,  reflect — "  These  are  the  human  sacrifices  of  the  war,  thus  far,  between  this 
Republic  and  Mexico  !" 

3.  This  war,  like  all  other  wars,  has  occasioned  the  most  barbarous  and  inhuman 
cruelties.  Think  of  the  sufferings  from  inadequate  and  bad  provisions  and  bad  water; 
to  say  nothing  of  the  suffering  from  these  when  no  water  could  be  obtained.  Think  of 
the  suffering  occasioned  by  long  and  tedious  marches  over  bad  roads,  in  a  sultry  clime, 
and,  in  many  instances,  with  feeble  health,  or  even  with  acute  disease.  One  of  the 
generals  of  the  American  army  is.  just  at  this  lime,  accused  by  the  public  press  of 
marching  his  men  over  the  burning  sand,  and  under  the  scorching  sun,  at  mid-day;  as 
a  natural  consequence,  numbers  were  overcome  by  heat  and  fatigue,  and  several  of 
them  fell  down  and  died  by  the  way  ! 

The  sufferings,  too,  from  inadequate  clothing.  Large  numbers — if  I  mistake  not — 
whole  regiments  were,  at  times,  so  utterly  unprovided  for  in  this  respect,  as  to  be  ex- 
posed to  severe  sufferings.  Young  men  of  intelligence  and  education,  accustomed  to 
the  luxuries  of  life,  are,  by  the  neglect  of  government,  absolutely  turned  naked  in  a 
wild  country,  and  exposed  to  the  rigors  of  the  climate,  and  suffering  from  the  weather, 
without  care  on  the  part  of  the  government  they  serve.'' 

1  might  proceed  with  similar  details  to  any  extent.  The  ordinary  history  of  the 
war,  as  of  all  wars,  is  filled  with  the  accounts  of  these  sufferings.  But  these  are  small 
when  compared  to  the  sacrifice  of  happiness,  the  severe  sufferings  of  the  sick,  the 
wounded  and  the  dying.  Unless  the  sick  soldier  has  the  singular  good  fortune  to  get 
admission  to  a  hospital,  his  blanket  and  the  ground  are  his  only  couch.  Kind  feeling 
there  doubtless  will  be  in  the  warm  breast  of  his  comrades;  but  their  power  to  aid  him, 
or  even  to  soothe  his  sorrows,  is  extremely  limited.  For  the  most  part,  he  must  suffer 
alone,  and  die  alone. 

But  what  tongue  or  pen  can  describe  the  pains  and  sufferings  of  the  wounded  and 
the  dying?  The  stoutest  hearts,  the  most  hardened  men,  have  relented  at  the  sight  of 
the  mangled  bodies  on  the  battle-field.  The  pains,  the  groans  and  the  agonies,  of 
wounded  and  dying  men,  scattered  over  the  plain,  or  crowded  into  the  hospital,  may  be 
"imagined,  but  can  never  be  adequately  described ! 

And  the  soldier  does  not  suffer  alone.  He  is  bound  to  kindred  and  sympathizing 
hearts  all  over  the  land,  who  are  the  partners  of  his  anguish.  What  scores  and  thous- 
ands await  the  coming  and  the  opening  of  the  mails,  with  silent  but  dreadful  agony  ! 
The  father,  the  mother,  the  wife,  the  children  and  friends,  have  trembled  as  they  lis- 
tened to  the  rattling  of  the  wheels  of  the  mail  coach;  and  trembled  again,  as  they  open- 
ed the  letters  from  the  scene  of  strife  and  war.  Thousands  of  innocent  and  peaceful 
citizens,  who  never  drew  a  breath  in  favor  of  the  war,  have  mourned  the  death  of  those 
cut  off  in  battle  or  who  perished  by  disease;  and  hundreds  of  thousands  more  have  suf- 
fered an  untold  amount  of  anguish,  in  the  apprehension  of  tho  sufferings  of  friends 
exposed  to  the  horrors  of  war.  • 

4.  But  there  are  individual  acts  of  cruelty  and  barbarity,  occasioned  by  the  war  with 
Mexico,  which  must  have  a  place  among  the  items  of  waste — the  cost  of  the  war. 

In  how  many  instances  have  small  parlies-'-sometimes,  soldiers — somelimes,  team- 
sters, or  travellers  and  traders — quietly  pursuing  their  way,  as  quietly  as  is  possible  in 
a  country  infested  with  war,  been  overtaken  and  cut  to  pieces'!  Go  to  the  place 
where  such  a  company  is  on  its  way;  on  a  sudden  they  are  surprised  by  a  company  of 
fierce-looking  armed  men; — then  follows  the  begging  for  life  on  the  part  of  defonseleas 


12 


men,  women  and  children; — see  their  butchery,  their  blood  flowin^;^-.hear  the  faint, 
faltering  accents  of  the  dying; — witness  the  last  struggle; — listen  to  the  last  groan,  and 
gaze  on  their  lifeless,  mangled  corpses,  when  their  spirits  are  fled.  Mark  the  men  who 
have  perpetrated  this  deed  of  savage  cruelty,  as  they  move  off  in  triumph,  bearing  in 
their  hands  the  spoils  of  war — the  price  of  blood  !  As  you  pause  and  reflect  on  this 
scene,  take  the  guage  and  dimensions  of  the  frightful  miseries  inflicted;  of  the  happiness 
sacrificed;  and  coolly  calculate  the  cost — the  waste — of  the  Mexican  war  I 

Go  to  the  town,  where  a  man  is  walking  with  others  on  the  open  plaza.  In  a  mo- 
ment, the  lasso  is  thrown  around  his  neck,  by  a  horseman,  and  he  is  dragged  at  full 
speed  to  a  retired  place,  where  he  is  robbed  of  his  papers  and  left  a  mangled  corpse  ! 

Mark  that  angel  of  mercy,  in  the  evening  after  the  battle  of  Monterey; — a  Mexican 
woman,  busily  engaged  in  carrying  bread  and  water  to  the  wounded  and  dying  of  both 
armies.  Says  an  eye  witness  :  "  i  saw  her  raise  the  head  of  a  wounded  man,  give  him 
water  and  food;  and  ihen  carefully  bind  up  his  ghastly  wound  with  a  handkerchief  from 
her  own  head.  After  she  had  exhausted  her  supplies,  she  returned  to  her  house  to  get 
bread  and  water  for  others.  As  she  was  returning  on  her  mission  of  mercy,  I  heard  the 
report  of  a  gun,  and  saw  the  poor,  innocent  creature  fall  dead.  It  m.ade  me  sick  at  heart, 
and,  turning  from  the  scene,  I  involuntarily  raised  my  eyes  to  heaven,  and  thought,  O, 
God  !  this  is  war.  Passing  the  spot  the  next  day,  1  saw  her  body  still  lying  there,  and 
the  bread  by  her  side,  and  the  broken  gourd,  with  a  few  drops  of  water  still  in  it — em- 
blems of  her  merciful  errand  !" 

In  the  accounts  of  one  of  the  battles  fought  since  this  war  begun,  it  is  stated  by  one 
who  professed  to  know,  that  among  the  dead  was  found  a  woman,  staked  through  the 
breast  to  the  earth  J!'''^ 

To  these,  and  many  other  similar  acts  of  cruelty  at  the  bare  recital  of  which  humanity 
shudders,  might  be  added  the  needless,  wanton,  and  brutal  acts,  by  which,  in  the  storm- 
ing of  towns,  the  conducting  of  sieges,  and  other  warlike  movements,  human  life  and 
happiness  have  been  trifled  with,  and  profusely  sacrificed.    But  such  is  war  1 

5.  There  is  another  waste — a  Joss,  of  a  far  more  important  kind,  to  be  enumerated. 
It  is  a  loss,  too,  on  the  largest  scale.  I  mean — the  sacrifice  of  a  good  conscience,  and 
of  religious  principle. 

Many,  it  is  believed,  by  enlistment—or  becoming  responsibly  connected  with  the  war 
at  all — violated  the  plainest  dictates  of  conscience. 

How  many,  who  went  to  fight  the  Mexicans— are  now  there,  or  on  their  way — retain 
the  principles  and  practice  of  temperance,  which  they  had  previously  adopted  ? 

How  many,  who  were  not  habituated  to  the  use  of  profane  and  impure  language,  soon 
learned  to  give  greater  license  to  the  tongue,  and  profane  the  name  of  God  1 

How  many,  who  were  trained  in  the  lap  of  piety  at  home;  were  conscientious  and 
pure  minded  youth  and  men — became  abandoned  to  gaming,  profanity,  and  more  de- 
grading vices  ? 

How  many,  who  regarded  the  book  and  the  day  of  God,  forgot  both  ? 

How  many,  who  were  once  nsembers  of  the  church  of  Christ,  have  not  only  fallen 
away,  but  becam.e  the  most  abandoned  and  wicked  of  their  company  ? 

What  numbers  of  them  have  been  enticed  from  the  paths  of  virtue,  and  encouraged 
in  wickedness,  by  the  example  of  their  officer^,  by  whose  influence  they  were  induced 
to  forsake  the  peaceful  employments  of  private  life,  for  the  trials,  exposures  and 
temptations,  of  the  camp  and  the* field? 

Who,  that  fairly  estimates  the  worth  of  virtue,  of  a  good  conscience,  and  of  the 
hopes  and  consolations  of  religion,  can  calculate  the  waste — the  loss — where  thousands 
sacrifice  them  all  ?  VVho,  that  understands  the  value  of  strict  temperance — the  value 
of  any  single  virlue,  and  how  indispensable  it  is  to  human  happiness — can  calculate 
the  loss  sustained  in  these  respects,  by  meanss  of  the  Mexican  war  ?  Habits  of  indus^ 
try  and  economy,  lost;  habits  of  temperance  and  sobriety,  abandoned;  habits  of  truth 
.and  conscientiousness,  given  up.    The  habit  of  thought  and  care  for  the  honor  of 


13 


God,  and  the  eternal  vv^jll-bQing  of  the  soul;  the  dearest  habits  of  mind,  and  qualitica 
of  the  heart,  perished;  the  soul  and  its  happiness  for  ever  lost ! — who  can  estimate  the 
waste  ?  Noble  exceptions,  doubtless,  there  are  to  all  this;  but  either  the  war  with  Mex- 
ico is  an  exception  to  ail  the  wars  ever  waged  by  civilized  nations,  or  these  things  are 
anriong  the  itenns  of  its  enormous  and  useless  waste. 

And,  when  *.he  war  is  over,  the  multitudes  that  remain — that  have  been  schooled 
amidst  its  immoralities, its  cruelties  and  its  crimes — will  operate,  like  a  moral  pestilence, 
over  the  length  and  breadth  of  the  lafid.  It  is  perfectly  natural  it  should  be  so.  It  is 
of  the  very  nature  of  their  employment,  to  make  them  feel  that  the  claims  of  humani- 
ty, of  virtue,  and  of  God,  are  a  mere  name.* 

6.  Again:  there  is  the  robbery  of  many  families  of  their  most  valuable  members, 
and  the  land,  of  those  who  had  it  in  their  power  to  do  much  for  the  general  good.  Ma- 
ny, who  might  have  done  essential  service  to  their  country  ,  and  to  their  species,  have 
been  sent  to  an  untimely  grave.  The  whole  land  feels  the  loss  of  some  of  her  ablest 
sons.  Our  own  state,  at  this  very  hour,  mourns  the  death  of  one,  just  rising  to  the 
strength  and  maturity  of  his  power  to  do  good.  The  country,  and  the  human  family, 
is  robbed  of  whatever  good  they  might  have  done. 

A  large  number  of  modest,  obscure  and  virtuous  families  have  been  robbed  of  their 
chief  solace  and  support.  The  aged  mother  is  robbed  of  the  son,  on  whose  more  youth- 
ful form  she  leaned  for  support.  The  young  wife,  whose  life  had  just  entwined  insepa- 
rably with  that  of  her  husband,  weeps  in  solitary  widowhood.  Brothers,  sisters,  chil- 
dren, are  robbed  of  their  best  friends,  and  the  dearest  solace  of  social  life.  But  they 
are  retiring,  and  modest.  Their  sorrows  will  remain  unknown,  and  unnoticed  on  earth, 
though  recorded  on  the  book  of  God's  remembrance,  among  the  cost  of  the  Mexican 
war. 

II.  Let  us,  in  the  second  place,  notice  the  reason  for  this  waste.  "To  what  pur- 
pose is  this  waste 

In  stating  the  reasons  why  we  are  at  war  with  Mexico — the  causes  of  the  war — I 
am  under  no  necessity,  nor  am  I  inclined  at  all,  to  submit  any  opinions  of  my  own. — 
The  causes  of  the  war  are  variously  stated,  some  of  vvhich  are  as  follows  : 

1.  It  is  said  that  Mexico  was  indebted  to  the  U.  States  in  about  the  sum  of  $3,000,000. 
That  she  had  promised  to  pay  it;  and,  either  she  would  not  or  could  not — at  all  events, 
she  did  not — pay  it.  And,  moreover,  she  had  not  always  acted  very  courteously  to- 
ward our  government.  In  plain  language — she  had  insulted  us;  and,  for  these  causes, 
we  are  at  war  with  her. 

2.  It  is  said  that  the  annexation  of  Texas,  in  contravention  of  the  expressed  will 
of  Mexico,  and  other  acts  connected  with  it,  were  the  germ  or  the  cause  of  the  war. 

3.  It  is  slated  that  a  disputed  claim  to  the  territory  lying  between  two  rivers — the 
Nueces  and  the  Rio  Grande — was  the  occasion  of  the  war. 

4.  It  has  been  asserted,  often,  that  the  war  was  caused  by  the  order  of  the  president 

*  This  is  the  passage  which  has  caused  such  serious  offense.  It  has  been  objected  to,  chiefly,  as  an  attack 
on  "  the  character  of  the  returned  volunteers."  Any  person  can  sec  at  a  glance,  that,  to  construe  the  lan- 
guage in  that  way,  is  to  wrest  it  from  its  obvious  import.  The  men,  generally,  of  all  sorts  and  grades,  who 
are  engaged  in  the  war,  and  who  suffer  its  trials  amd  temptations,  are  the  objects  of  the  remarks.  For 
aught  that  the  passage  declares  to  the  contrary,  every  "returned  volunteer"  may  be  even  purer  in  virtue 
than  before  he  went.  Besides,  there  are  not  above  a  half  dozen  persons,  who  went  to  Mexico  and  have 
returned,  with  whose  morals  and  habits  I  am,  or  ever  was,  acquainted  ;  and  therefore  could  not,  had  1  been 
disposed,  have  given  a  particle  of  testimony  on  the  subject.  The  fact  that  thei/  are  returned,  and  refused  a 
second  enlistment,  is,  in  my  view,  greatly  in  favor  of  their  morals.  But  the  reported  results  of  the  war,  on 
the  morals  and  habits  of  those  who  engage  in  it,  it  is  not  very  ditlicult  to  obtain.  There  is  one  way,  and 
one  only,  in  which  any  ''returned  volunteer"  can,  with  fairness,  apply  the  statements  to  himself.  It  is  by 
acknowledging  himself  a  sufferer  in  his  morals,  by  his  connection  with  the  war.  In  this  case,  though  not 
thought  of  by  me  when  the  discourse  was  preached,  I  acknovcledge,  the  statements  fairly  apply. 

But  it  seems  quite  probable  that  my  faults  are  greater,  and  less  likely  to  be  forgiven,  because  I  did  not  ren- 
der suitable  praise  for  their  deeds  of  valor  and  courage.  I  have  not  a  particle  of  doubt  that  they  fought  as 
bravely,  and  as  destructively,  as  any  fighting  men  ever  did;  and  that  they  deserve  all  the  praise,  and  glory, 
that  belongs  to  men  who  engage  in  the  deadly  strife  of  the  battle-field.  But,  for  a  minister  of  Christ  to  unite 
in  praising  the  military  hero,  it  seems  proper  to  ascertain  where — in  the  gospel,  martial  courage — valor  dis- 
played in  fighting  the  enemies  of  one's  country  in  war  is  counted  a  christian  virtue.  The  Illinois  volunteers 
were  doubtless  as  brave— and  fought  as  well— as  any  fighters  in  any  age  of  the  world  ;  but  it  surely  is  not 
needful,  in  order  to  fight  well,  to  have  a  good  moral  character — or  to  preserve  it. 


14 


to  ihe  army,  to  occupy  the  disputed  territory;  and  therefore  it  is  the  pi-esident's  war, 
and  he  alone  is  responsible  for  it.  If  this  be  true,  the  president  may  well  tremble  at 
the  fearful  responsibility  assumed,  and  the  dread  account  he  must  render  to  God  ! 

5.  It  is  claimed  in  a  famous  executive  docun?ent,  that  Mexico  actually  commenced 
hostilities;  while  in  other  portions  of  the  same  document  is  a  long  argument,  to  show 
that,  according  to  the  usages  of  na'ions,  the  United  States  had  good  reasons  for  com- 
mencing them,  and  tacitly  admits  that  such  was  actually  ihe  case;  or,  that  we  were  the 
aggressors.  For  the  truih  of  such  statements  and  reasonings,  it  is  not  for  me  to  be 
responsible. 

6.  It  is  asserted  that  the  -.var  was  brought  on,  as  the  result  of  executive  policy,  to  favor 
a  section  nf  the  Union,  with  no  impartial  regard  to  the  true  interests  of  the  whole. 

7.  It  is  regarded  by  many  as  a  master  stroke  of  policy,  on  the  part  of  our  govern- 
ment, to  protect,  perpeluate  and  extend  slavery,  by  the  acquisition  of  new  territory  to 
be  formed  into  new  slave  states. 

8.  It  is  quite  likely  that  intimations,  often  thrown  before  the  public  mind — sometimes 
by  speeches  in  Congress;  sometimes  through  the  columns  of  a  newspaper,  in  the  re- 
ports of  the  agents  of  the  government,  by  travellers  and  speculators — that  imrwense 
wealth  was  treasured  up  in  the  churches  of  Mexico,  and  in  the  hands  of  the  priests  and 
prominent  wealthy  men;  and  that  vast  resources  would  be  derived  from  the  mines,  pro- 
vided they  were  subjected  to  Anglo-Saxon  skill  and  enterprize;  have  had  theiv  full 
share  of  influence  to  produce  the  war,  by  preparing  all  the  covetous,  and  through  them 
thousands  of  others,  in  all  parts  of  the  land,  to  welcome  the  war,  who  would  otherwise 
have  utterly  opposed  it. 

9.  It  is  said  to  be  prosecuted  with  vigor,  to  obtain  the  boon  of  peace.  Because  we 
so  greatly  desire  a  peace^  therefore  we  prosecute  the  war  with  murderous  ferocity. 

Whether  any  or  all  or  none,  of  these  are  the  true  causes  of  the  war,  it  is  not  in  my 
power  to  say.  They  are  the  reasons,  alleged  by  men  of  various  sentiments,  and  par- 
ties, in  the  country.  And  this,  it  is  presumed,  is  about  all  that  can  be  said  in  favor  of 
the  war.  .Let  us  then, 

III.  As  christians,  bring  these  causes  of  the  war  into  comparison  with  its  waste; 
and  thus  see  the  occasion  for  unfeigned  humiliation  before  God,  and  earnest  prayer  to 
Him,  to  stop  the  effusion  of  blood  and  bestow,  speedily,  the  blessings  of  peace. 

1.  This  war,  like  all  other  wars,  is  a  crime  against  God  and  man.  V^iewed  in  the 
light  of  christian  truth,  it  is  of  the  same  nature,  originated  in  the  same  law,  and  is  waged 
under  Ihe  influence  of  the  same  criminal  passions,  and  has  the  same  malignant  relations 
to  humanity,  and  to  the  government  of  God,  as  other  wars.  It  enjoys  but  a  single  sad 
pre-eminence,  the  utter  want  of  any  plausible  excuse  for  it.  Even  allowing  that  war 
Uiight  ever  be  justified  or  excused,  the  reasons  given  for  this  are  its  condemnation  ;  out 
of  its  own  mouth  is  v.  judged*    1  ask,  then, 

2.  Is  it  right — can  this  waste  be  justified,  by  an  enlightened  public  conscience,  and 
by  the  principles  of  the  gospel  of  God,  our  Savior]  If  not,  then  have  we  sinned  in 
entering  upon  the  war;  sinned  in  prosecuting  it,  and  and  are  sinning  still;  sinning  na- 
tionally, and  grievously,  by  not  withdrawing  at  once,  from  all  belligerent  action,  and 
trusting  to  other  and  peaceful  means  to  settle  our  controversy,  and  establish  justice  be- 
tween us  and  Mexico. 

We  have  sunk  fifty — one  hundred — perhaps,  two  hundred  millions  of  dollars;  the  gift 
of  God,  through  the  productive  industry  of  the  nation.  We  have,  by  this  war,  occa- 
sioned enormous  sufierings,  and  inhuman  cruelties.  The  virtue  of  multitudes,  the 
most  precious  of  human  possessions,  we  have  freely  sacrificed.  Thousands  of  families 
we  have  robbed  of  their  chief  solace  and  support;  we  have  tilled  thousands  of  dwellings 
with  mourning,  and  tens  of  thousands  of  hearts  with  unutterable  anguish  and  woe! 
We  have  caused  the  cry  of  the  poor,  the  widow  and  the  orphan,  to  go  up  to  avenging 
heaven.  We  have  robbed  the  land  of  some  of  her  choicest  sons,  her  brightest  orna-- 
ments;  and  humanity  of  those  who  had  it  in  their  power  to  do  much  for  the  well-being 


15 


of  the  human  race.  We  have  already  sent  to  the  g^rave  lifteen  thousand  human  beings! 
By  the  ruthless  hand  of  war,  they  have  been  torn  from  the  tender  ties  of  domesiic  and 
social  affinity  and  love;  and  led  up,  in  solemn  procession,  to  the  great  bloody  altar;  the 
human  sacrifices  to  the  relentless  and  insatiable  god  of  war ! 

And  will  it  justify  us;  will  conscience— will  heaven—justify  us,  in  doing  these 
deeds,  directly  or  indirectly,  because  Mexico  owed  us  ^3,000,000,  and  would  not  pay 
it! — or,  that  she  insulted  us,  and  we  had  not  grace  to  bear  it!  Will  it  justify  us  in 
such  deeds,  to  say  we  wanted  Texas,  and  endeavored  to  think  we  had  a  claim  to  it, 
and  were  determined  to  have  it!  Or,  will  it  answer  to  say  that  the  war  was  the  fruit 
of  a  rash  act  of  the  president,  in  ordering  the  armed  occupation  of  the  disputed  ter- 
ritory, and  the  country  thus  involved  in  war  without  our  fault,  we  go  for  the  country, 
right  or  wrong  ?  Will  conscience,  will  God  justify  us,  in  these  deeds  of  darkness,  for 
such  a  reason  ?  Or  will  it  do,  in  view  of  the  well-known  facts  of  the  case,  to  protend 
that  iMexico  provoked  the  war,  by  acts  of  aggression  and  hostility !  Who  will  be- 
lieve it  ? 

And  when  these  wrongs  to  humanity  are  to  be  accounted  for;  when  the  voice  of 
bereaved  homes,  and  bereaved  hearts,  and  the  voice  of  blood,  cries  from  15,000  graves, 
to  heaven,  against  us;  will  it  do  to  reply  that  we  needed  more  territory  to  make  new 
slave  states,  to  preserve  the  balance  of  power  between  the  north  and  the  south;  or  to 
perpetuate  and  extend  slavery!  Is  that  institution  so  fraught  with  blessings  to  the 
country,  and  the  race,  so  beneficial  to  either  master  or  slave,  to  the  oppressor  or  the 
oppressed;  is  it  in  such  excellent  odor  among  civilized  nations,  and  so  approved  by  a 
just  and  benevolent  God,  that  to  foster  and  protect  it,  we  may  be  justified  in  squander- 
ing hundreds  of  millions  of  dollars,  in  producing  the  most  enormous  and  wide-spread 
miseries,  and  in  the  offering  of  15,000  human  sacrifices!  If  this  language  seem  se- 
vere,  it  is  because  the  facts  themselves  are  severe. 

But  the  question  returns  :  are  we  justified — or,  are  we,  as  a  nation,  guilty,  and 
bound  by  every  consideration  of  truth  and  right,  to  humble  ourselves  before  God,  and 
seek  his  forgiveness,  and  ask  his  interposition,  to  enable  us  to  retrace  our  steps,  and 
thus  "  bring  forth  fruits  meet  for  repentance!" 

3.  Reflect,  too,  what  ends — worthy  of  humanity,  and  approved  of  heaven — -might 
have  been  attained,  by  the  proper  use  of  the  treasure  we  have  ingloriously  wasted. 

Our  gifts  to  the  starving  population  of  Ireland,  have  astonished  the  civilized  world. 
But  the  whole  amount  of  our  charities,  to  the  famishing  millions  of  other  lands,  would 
scarcely  equal  the  expenditure  for  the  Mexican  war  a  sirigle  week.  It  was  a  humane 
and  noble  deed,  done  by  our  own  state  legislature,  at  its  last  session- — the  granting  of 
$60,000  to  found  a  hospital  for  the  insane;  to  restore  to  home  and  friends,  and  kin" 
dred,  and  society;  to  themselves,  to  virtue,  and  to  God,  the  unfortunate,  whose  lamp 
of  reason  had  gone  out.  But  this  sum  would  pay  the  expenses  of  the  Mexican  war — 
three  hours!  And  the  cost  of  all  similar  insiitutions,  in  the  whole  land;  the  institu- 
tions for  the  relief  of  the  poor  and  the  suffering,  of  every  name;  the  Hospitals,  the 
Asylums,  the  Retreats,  the  Homes;  by  means  of  which,  comfort  and  happiness  are 
freely  provided  for  thousands,  would  be  consumed  by  this  war  in  a  very  few  days! 

The  combined  expense  of  the  hundreds  of  colleges  and  seminaries;  of  the  thousands 
of  acadenr.ies,  and  tens  of  thousands  of  common  schools,  which  are  justly  accounted 
the  glory  of  the  land;— the  entire  cost  of  all  the  means  of  education,  enjoyed  by  the 
American  people,  is  but  a  mere  pittance  compared  to  the  amount  squandered  annually 
in  the  war  with  Mexico. 

The  cost  of  the  administration  of  justice,  in  the  courts  of  the  general  government, 
by  which  justice  is  carried  to  the  door  of  twenty  millions  of  people,  for  a  whole  year, 
would  scarce  sustain  the  expense  of  this  war  a  single  day  ! 

The  entire  cost  of  all  the  benevolent  and  philanthropic  institutions,  and  societies,  in 
the  land;  the  cost  of  all  the  means  of  education  of  every  description;  the  cost  of  sus- 
taining all  the  churches,  and  all  the  means  of  moral  and  religious  improvement  put  to- 


16 


^lelher,  would  equal  the  expense  of  tlie  war  but  for  a  few  short  weeks !!  So  wide  is  the 
difference  between  the  cost  of  virtue  and  vice; — between  ihe  nneans  to  destroy  life, 
and  the  means  of  its  preservation.  And  is  it  right,  to  waste  the  treasures  which  a 
beneficent  God  has  provided  and  entrusted  to  us,  as  his  stewards,  to  swell  the  tide  Of 
human  happiness,  in  such  an  unhallowed  enterprize  as  the  Mexican  war  ? 

*^  Were  half  the  power  that  keeps  the  world  in  terror — 

Were  half  the  wealth,  bestowed  on  camps  and  courts — 

Given  to  redeem  the  human  mind  from  error, 

There  were  no  need  of  arsenals  and  forts. 

The  warrior's  name  would  be  a  name  abhorr'd, 

And  every  nation,  that  should  lift  aj^ain 

Its  hand  against  its  brother — on  its  forehead 

Would  wear,  for  evermore,  the  curse  of  Cain.-' — Longfellow. 

4.  Look  at  the  law  of  God;  seeking,  by  the  use  of  his  authority,  to  bind  all  his  in- 
telligent creatures,  made  of  one  blood,  in  one  harmonious  and  blissful  brotherhood — 
seeking  to  make  every  heart  beat  in  unison  with  his  own,  and  to  make  every  hand 
*'  a  consecrated  channel  for  his  love  to  flow  in;" — look  seriously,  at  that  law,  and  ask, 
is  it  right  tor  the  American  nation — a  nation  exalted  to  heaven  in  intellectual  and 
moral  advantages — to  employ  her  mighty  energies  in  such  an  enterprise  of  blood,  of 
woe  and  death,  as  the  Mexican  war  f 

5.  Look  to  Calvary — where  the  Son  of  God  is  dying,  amid  the  agonies  of  the  Cross, 
for  the  redemption  of  men"-and  as  you  gaze  on  that  scene,  read,  from  the  word  of 
Him  who  cannot  lie,  «*  Ye  are  bought  with  a  price."  Remember  that  ihe  ransom  price 
is  there  freely  paid,  and  the  door  of  hope  freely  opened  to  all.  And  can  we,  a  chris- 
tian nation,  be  guiltless,  when  we  send  to  the  battle-field,  and  to  premature  death, 
thousands  for  whom  the  Savior  died,  and  to  whom  we  are  commanded  to  bear  the  mes- 
sage of  his  mercy,  that  they  may  live? 

6.  Nor  let  it  be  forgotten  that  there  is  a  reckoning  day.  As  a  nation,  God  will 
deal  with  us  in  due  time.  He  requires  of  us  justice,  mercy,  and  good  will,  to  the  vast 
brotherhood  of  nations.  No  nation  on  earth  ever  was  placed  in  circumstances  better 
to  understand  and  appreciate  her  duty,  and  her  true  glory,  in  these  respects,  than  our 
own.  We  owe  it  to  ourselves — we  owe  it  to  the  human  family,  so  long  torn  and  dis- 
tracted,^ and  enfeebled,  by  wars; — we  owe  it  to  God,  the  author  of  all  our  privileges, 
to  set  before  all  nations  an  example  of  forbearance,  of  peace,  of  love,  in  aU  our  national 
intercourse  and  relations.  He  that  created  us — He  that  sustains  us — against  whom 
we  have  sinned,  and  who  is  "giving  us  blood  to  drink  because  we  are  worthy;'*  re- 
quires us  to  humble  ourselves  before  Him  for  our  sins,  in  warring  against  our  feeble 
sister  Republic;  and  to  retrace  our  steps,  and  thus  avert  His  righteous  judgments. 

Let  the  Church  of  God — His  acknowledcjed  servants  and  children — cease  not  to 
confess  their -sins,  and  the  sins  of  the  people,  and  seek  the  return  of  peace;  that  His 
name  may  be  glorified,  and  the  true  interests  of  these  warring  nations  be  promoted, 
on  the  largest  scale,  and  on  the  permanent  foundation  of  truth  and  right. 


c