Skip to main content

Full text of "Two great Englishwomen, Mrs. Browning & Charlott Brontë; with an essay on poetry, illustrated from Wordsworth, Burns, and Byron"

See other formats


UC-NRLF 


QD 


*^.%, 


REESE'  LIBRARY 

• 

CALIFORNIA 


UN 


WERS 

Received 
A  cces$im.s 


:TY 


/ 


Shelf  No. 


'    C    •  ^> " 

'     L  *-'- 

+  %&&      "-      S 

n  ^  &-'-/'    r 


- 


TWO  GREAT  ENGLISHWOMEN 


MBS.  BROWNING  &  CHARLOTTE  BRONTE 


WITH   AN 


ESSAY    ON    POETEY, 


ILLUSTRATED    FROM 


WORDSWORTH,  BURNS,  AND  BYKON. 


BY 

PETEE  BAYNE,  M.A.,  LL.D., 

Author  of  "  Chief  Actors  in  the  Puritan  Revolution,"  "  Lessons  from 
My  Masters,"  8fc>,  $c. 


ILontion  : 
JAMES  CLARKE  &  CO.,  13  &  14,  FLEET  STREET. 

1881. 


NOTE. 

THE  Essay  on  Poetry  is  published  for  the  first  time.  Those 
on  Mrs.  Browning  and  the  Bronte  sisters  are  founded  on 
Studies  which  appeared  hi  \Tfie  Literary  World,  and  have 
now  been  carefully  revised,  greatly  modified,  and  considerably 
extended. 


6—2 


CONTENTS. 

ESSAY     ON     POETRY. 

PAGE 

Criticism  by  Sample — Mr.  Arnold's  Test  of  no  use  to  ordinary 
readers — Poetry  not  criticism,  but  creation — Observation 
and  Imagination — The  Poetic  Glow — Metrical  Form — The 
Song-element — Wordsworth — Burns — Byron— Mrs.  Brown- 
ing—The Bronte  Sisters  .  .  .  .  ix 


ELIZABETH  BARRETT  BROWNING. 

CHAPTEB 

I. — Her  Earliest  Verses  .  .  .  .  .3 

II. — The  Seraphim  and  Drama  of  Exile  .  .  .7 

III.— A  Vision  of  Poets,  and  The  Poet's  Vow  .  .  .27 

IV. — The  Romaunt  of  Margret,  and  other  Poems  .  .38 

V.— Her  Philanthropic  Poetry  .  .  .  .  .48 

VI. — Lyric  Pencillings    .  .  .  .  .  .55 

VII. — Lady  Geraldine's  Courtship  .  .  .  .60 

VIIL— The  Rhyme  of  the  Duchess  May  .  .  .  .72 

IX.— Poems  of  Affection.  .  .  .  .  .81 

X. — Her  Love  Sonnets    .  .  .  .  .  .87 

XI. — Poems  of  Patriotic  Sympathy        .  .  .  .97 

XII. — Aurora  Leigh. — Conclusion  .  .  .  .     107 


CHARLOTTE  BRONTE  AND  HER  SISTERS. 

I. — General  Impression  of  Charlotte  Bronte— Thackeray's 
opinion  of  her — Mrs.  Gaskell  and  Mr.  Wemyss 
Reid— The  Moors— The  Mother  of  the  Brontes— 
The  Father's  Poems  .  .  157 


viii  Contents. 


CHAPTEB  PAGE 

II. — Branwell    Bronte — Charlotte's     Correspondence    with 

Southey 168 

III.— The  Poems  of  the  Sisters— Emily  Bronte  .  .180 

IV.— Wuthering  Heights 196 

V. — Heathcliff  and  Cathy — Old    Joseph— Isabella— Linton 

Heathcliff 207 

VI.— Heathcliff  and  Cathy— Emily  Bronte  and  Mr.  G.    H. 

Lewes    .......    221 

VII. — Charlotte  and  Emily  in  Brussels — Belgian  Scenery — 
The    Professor— Villette— The    School    Scenes    in 
Jane  Eyre         .  .  .  .  .  .     23S 

VIII.— Jane  Eyre— Thornfield  Hall— Meeting  with  Eochester  .    247 
IX. — Jane  and  Eochester— Jane's  Pictures — The  Mermaid— 

Eochester's  Plea  .....    262 

X. — Charlotte  Bronte's  Defence  of   Jane  Eyre — Eochester 

an  egotist         ....  .  278 

XI.— Women's    Eights— The     Ethics    of    Abnegation— Mr. 

Meredith  on  Egotism — Thackeray's  moral  analysis    291 
'XII. — M.  Paul  Emanuel — The  Bronte  lovers      .  .  .    299 

XIII. — Mr.  Donne's  Exodus— Shirley  the  author's  most  charac- 
teristic book — Mercenary  Marriage — A  Day  with 
Shirley— The  Duty  of  Endurance  .  .  .311 

XIV.— The  Bronte  genius— The  Yorkshire  School  of  Litera- 
ture—The Deaths  of  the  Sisters  .  326 


ESSAY   ON    POETRY. 


POETRY 


WITH 


ILLUSTRATIONS    FROM    WORDSWORTH,    BURNS, 
AND    BYRON. 


I  DON'T  know  that  criticism  wants  any  other 
vindication  than  that  good  critical  writing  is 
very  pleasant  reading.  Mr.  Buskin  and  Mr.  Arnold 
have  of  late  used  words  so  dainty,  bright,  and  ex- 
pressive in  instructing  us  as  to  what  true  poetry 
is  that,  apart  from  the  value  of  the  lesson  (which  I 
estimate  highly),  we  like  the  receiving  of  it.  These 
eminent  critics  have  laid  stress  mainly  upon  the 
selection  of  examples,  not  indeed  excluding  system 
and  formula,  but,  on  the  whole,  choosing  rather  to 
show  what  poetry  is  than  to  say.  The  method  is  a 
delightful  one  for  the  pupil,  and  the  examples  quoted 
by  Mr.  Buskin  and  Mr.  Arnold  are,  with  hardly  an 
exception,  so  apt  and  beautiful,  that  I  wish  they  could 
be  indefinitely  extended.  But  it  is  a  method  that 
obviously  belongs  of  right  only  to  those  who  have  a 
great  and  just  confidence  in  themselves.  To  such  it 


xii  Poetry. 

is  given  by  the  acclamation  of  their  contemporaries, 
and  the  acquiescent  consciousness  of  genius,  to  wield 
the  sceptre  of  the  realms  of  admiration  ;  to  touch, 
with  golden  authority,  this,  that,  and  the  other  poetic 
gem,  and  to  say,  "  These  are  admirable  ;  admire  what 
are  like  these."  I  shrink  from  the  presumption  of 
adopting  this  imperial  method. 

Sooth  to  say,  however,  there  is  another  objection  to 
this  mode  of  teaching  the  art  of  poetical  criticism. 
The  samples,  though  chosen  with  infallible  tact,  can 
consist,  severally,  of  but  a  few  lines,  and  can  bear  no 
proportion  to  the  works  from  which  they  are  taken. 
If  these  are  by  great  poets,  the  probability  is  that,  for 
every  line  quoted,  its  author  has  written  at  least  a 
thousand.  A  poem  is  an  organised  thing.  That  is 
self-evident  and  indisputable.  From  the  lyric  of  three 
stanzas  to  the  epic  of  four-and-twenty  books,  every 
true  poem  is  a  unity  of  many  parts.  Its'  organisation 
is  fine  and  complex,  so  fine,  complex,  and  mysterious 
that  Mr.  Kuskin  does  not  scruple  to  pronounce  a  true 
poem  a  living  thing,  and  that  not  in  mere  meta- 
phorical illustration,  but  with  aim  at  clear  scientific 
precision.  Now,  a  handful  will  tell  you  the  quality  of 
a  quarter  of  wheat,  a  tumblerful  will  tell  you  the 
quality  of  a  cubic  league  of  sea- water,  a  chip  will  tell 
you  the  quality  of  a  block  of  granite  weighing  a 
thousand  tons ;  but  people  have  been  very  properly 
laughing  for  more  than  two  thousand  years  at  the 
man  who  carried  about  a  brick  as  sample  of  a  house, 
and  a  brick  may  give  you  much  more  information 


Criticism  by  Sample.  xiii 

about  a  house  than  a  line,  or  a  couple  of  lines,  or  even 
a  stray  stanza,  ahout  a  poem.  If  we  add,  what  is 
again  indisputable,  that  the  greatest  poets  have  weak, 
flat,  bombastic  passages,  and  that  very  little  poets 
occasionally  strike  a  lofty  note,  we  shall  have  the  more 
reason  to  distrust  the  critical  method  which  depends 
upon  selected  lines  or  stanzas.  Two  critics,  equally 
adroit  and  equally  well  read,  would  have  no  difficulty 
in  bombarding  each  other  with  separate  lines,  to 
prove,  in  the  one  case,  that  Shakespeare  was  a  great, 
in  the  other  that  he  was  not  a  great,  poet ;  and  the 
simple  hearer,  unacquainted  with  Shakespeare's  works, 
might  find  himself  utterly  unable,  at  the  end  of  an 
hour,  to  decide  as  to  the  place  he  deserves  to  occupy 
among  poets. 

But  it  is  the  simple  reader,  not  the  man  whose 
born  instinct  and  disciplined  and  cultured  skill  enable 
him  to  dispense  with  rules,  that  requires  to  be  assisted 
to  discriminate  between  excellent  poetry  and  such  as 
is  not  excellent ;  and,  in  his  interest,  we  may  ask 
whether  it  is  not  possible  to  define  the  characteristics 
of  true  poetry  generally,  in  such  a  way  that  he  may 
intelligently  assign  a  reason  for  considering  one  poet, 
on  the  whole,  greater  than  another.  In  endeavouring 
to  arrive  at  a  comprehensive  and  at  the  same  time 
practically  useful  criterion  of  excellence  in  poetry,  I 
shall  continue  to  avail  myself  of  the  pleasant  help  of 
Mr.  Matthew  Arnold,  though  not  in  a  spirit  of  too 
servile  pupilage. 

Poetry,  as  Mr.  Arnold  first  and  fundamentally  con- 


xiv  Poetry. 

ceives  it,  is  "  a  criticism  of  life."  More  particularly  it 
is  "  a  criticism  of  life  under  the  conditions  fixed  for 
such  a  criticism  by  the  laws  of  poetic  truth  and 
poetic  beauty."  This  addition,  however,  only  seems 
to  help  us ;  for  it  is  clearly  a  truism  to  say  that 
poetry  is  criticism  under  poetical  conditions.  We 
do  not  define  an  island  when  we  call  it  land  situated 
under  insular  conditions.  The  question  is,  What  are 
the  conditions  which  distinguish  that  criticism  of  life 
which  is  poetical  from  that  criticism  of  life  which  is 
not  poetical  ?  To  have  poetical  value,  he  explains 
from  Aristotle,  criticism  of  life  must  have  high  truth 
and  high  seriousness — it  must,  in  both  respects,  be 
higher  than  history  ;  and  excellent  poetry  is  such  as 
involves  "  the  noble  and  profound  application  of  ideas 
to  life." 

Let  us  apply  these  principles  to  a  passage  quoted 
by  Mr.  Arnold  from  Wordsworth. 

Oh,  for  the  coming  of  that  glorious  time 
When,  prizing  knowledge  as  her  noblest  wealth 
And  best  protection,  this  Imperial  Bealm, 
While  she  exacts  allegiance,  shall  admit 
.   An  obligation,  on  her  part,  to  teach 
Them  who  are  born  to  serve  her  and  obey  ; 
Binding  herself  by  statute  to  secure, 
For  all  the  children  whom  her  soil  maintains, 
The  rudiments  of  letters,  and  inform 
The  mind  with  moral  and  religious  truth ! 

These  lines  accord  well  with  Mr.  Arnold's  main 
conception  of  poetry.  They  are  manifestly  a  criticism 
of  life.  No  criticism  could  be  more  serious,  and  I  do 
not  see  that  any  criticism  could  be  more  true.  Does 


Mr.  Arnold's  Test.  xv 

the  passage  not  embrace,  also,  a  "  noble  and  profound 
application  of  ideas  to  life  "  ?  What  form  of  life  could 
be  presented  to  the  imagination  more  august  than  that 
of  a  mighty  nation?  And  what  idea  bearing  upon 
national  life  could  be  nobler  than  that  all  the  children 
belonging  to  a  nation  ought  to  be  instructed  ?  Apply- 
ing Mr.  Arnold's  test,  then,  to  these  lines — inquiring 
whether  they  exemplify  a  noble  and  profound  appli- 
cation of  ideas  to  life — we  are  shut  up  to  the  con- 
clusion that  they  are  excellent  poetry.  To  our  sur- 
prise, however,  on  turning  to  him  for  that  confirma- 
tion of  our  decision  which  we  have  a  right  to  expect, 
we  are  greeted  with  this  estimate  of  the  passage  : 
"  Wordsworth  calls  Voltaire  dull,  and  surely  the  pro- 
duction of  these  un-Voltairian  lines  must  have  been 
imposed  upon  him  as  a  judgment.  One  can  hear 
them  being  quoted  at  a  Social  Science  Congress  ;  one 
can  call  up  the  whole  scene.  A  great  room  in  one  of 
our  dismal  provincial  towns ;  dusty  air  and  jaded 
afternoon  daylight ;  benches  full  of  men  with  bald 
heads  and  women  in  spectacles ;  an  orator  lifting  up 
his  face  from  a  manuscript  written  within  and  without 
to  declaim  these  lines  of  Wordsworth ;  and,  in  the 
soul  of  any  poor  child  of  nature  who  may  have 
wandered  in  thither,  an  unutterable  sense  of  lamenta- 
tion, and  mourning,  and  woe !  " 

In  other  words,  Mr.  Arnold  thinks  Wordsworth's 
lines  exceedingly  bad  poetry,  so  bad  that  only  such 
persons  as  are  worthy  of  bitter  contempt  would 
listen  to  them.  Why  the  members  of  the  Social 


xvi  Poetry. 

Science  Congress  should  be  selected  for  anointing 
from  the  phials  of  Mr.  Arnold's  scorn,  it  is  not  easy 
to  see.  About  the  practical  operations  that  precede 
pleasant  results  there  is  apt  to  be  a  certain  dingi- 
ness,  dreariness.  Follow  a  gardener  as  he  digs 
about  and  dungs  young  apple-trees,  a  school  inspector 
as  he  examines  stupid  classes,  a  Florence  Nightingale 
as  she  looks  into  the  details  of  hospital  work,  and  you 
will  meet  with  matters  as  unromantic  as  the  "  dusty 
air  and  jaded  afternoon  daylight "  in  which  "  men 
with  bald  heads  and  women  in  spectacles  "  do  their 
best  to  broaden  the  thin  margin  of  white  on  the  page 
of  life,  and  find  some  anodyne  for  human  pain.  But  it 
is  not  our  present  business  to  inquire  into  Mr.  Mat- 
thew Arnold's  view  of  the  contemptibility  of  trying 
to  bring  scientific  precision  of  thought  and  know- 
ledge into  the  operations  of  benevolence.  What  we 
are  concerned  with  is  the  discovery  that  Mr.  Arnold's 
quotation,  himself  being  witness,  is  very  defective 
poetry,  although,  to  the  best  of  our  judgment,  it  is 
admirable  criticism  of  life.  It  happens  that  I  agree 
with  Mr.  Arnold  that  Wordsworth's  lines  are  not  of 
high  poetical  value ;  but  I  hope  to  be  able  to  assign  a 
better  reason  for  thinking  so  than  is  touched  upon  by 
Mr.  Arnold's  test. 

Let   us   take   another   example   from   Mr.   Arnold. 
The  poet  is  again  Wordsworth. 

One  adequate  support 
For  the  calamities  of  mortal  life 
Exists — one  only ; — an  assured  belief 


Mr.  Arnold's  Test.  xvii 

That  the  procession  of  our  fate,  howe'er 
Sad  or  disturbed,  is  ordered  by  a  Being 
Of  infinite  benevolence  and  power ; 
Whose  everlasting  purposes  embrace 
All  accidents,  converting  them  to  good. 

Could  any  criticism  of  life  be  higher  in  its  serious- 
ness, nobler  in  its  tone,  than  this  ?     Those  who  dis- 
believe in  the  existence  or  providence  of  God  will  say 
that,  for  them,  it  is  untrue  criticism  ;  but  it  is  difficult 
to  see  how  any  one  should  deny  that,  from  the  poet's 
standpoint,  it  is  profound  criticism.     Were  we  treat- 
ing of  the  poet  of  a  vanished  civilisation,  an  extinct 
religion,  we  should  be  constrained  to  admit  that  lines 
into  which  he  condensed  the  quintessence  of  that  con- 
solation which  all  races  and  tribes  of  men  accepting 
the  religion  in  question  had  derived  from  it  were,  as 
criticism  of  life,  both  noble  and  profound.     Here,  too, 
however,  Mr.  Arnold  holds  that  the  lines  are  not  good 
poetry.     They  fail,  he  says,  to  exhibit  "the  characters 
of  poetic  truth."     We  have  a  fair  smile  at  Mr.  Arnold 
for  his  italics,  and  remind  him  that  he  has  been  teach- 
ing us  that  criticism  of  life,  qualified  by  a  few  adjec- 
tives— true,  serious,  profound,  noble,  each  taken  in  a 
very  high  degree — is  excellent  poetry.     He  was  bound 
to  show  either  that  the  lines  are  shallow  and  ignoble 
as  criticism  of  life,  or  that  they  are  not  inferior  as 
poetry.     I  do  not  think  the  poetical  quality  of  Mr. 
Arnold's  second  quotation  so  poor  as  that  of  his  first ; 
but   I    do   not    think    it   is    poetically    worth   much. 
And  again   I   think   I   can   assign   a  reason  for  this 


xviii  Poetry. 

estimate    more   tenable    than    its    worth    or    worth- 
lessness  as  a  criticism  of  life. 

Once  more  I  take  a  sample  from  Mr.  Arnold.  It  is 
now  Shakespeare  that  is  the  poet,  the  lines  occurring 
in  Henry  the  Fourth's  expostulation  with  sleep. 

Wilt  thou  upon  the  high  and  giddy  mast 

Seal  up  the  ship-boy's  eyes,  and  rock  his  brains 

In  cradle  of  the  rude,  imperious  surge  ? 

Can  it  be  alleged  that,  in  any  practical,  tangible, 
not  fantastic  sense,  these  lines  contain  any  criticism 
of  life  whatever  ?  They  are  an  exceedingly  imagina- 
tive— a  most  picturesque  and  powerful — description 
of  the  influence  of  sleep  in  lulling  into  unconscious- 
ness all  sense  of  danger,  all  capacity  of  joy  or  pain  ; 
but  as  a  criticism  of  life  they  can  scarcely  be  weighed 
or  measured,  and  no  one  could  aver  that,  in  serious- 
ness or  profoundity  of  meaning,  they  excel  a  grave 
summing-up  of  the  consolation  mankind  has  derived 
from  the  consciousness  of  God.  Yet  Mr.  Arnold  tells 
us  that  these  lines  are  unsurpassably  fine  poetry.  I 
agree  with  him  for  reasons  that  will  presently  appear; 
but  in  the  meantime  I  reiterate  the  question,  "What 
profit  can  be  had  of  a  test  of  poetic  quality  that  fails 
so  egregiously?  Mr.  Arnold's  criterion  is  like  the 
Bank  Act — made  to  be  suspended  exactly  in  those 
emergencies  which  it  was  intended  to  provide  against. 
We  should  want  Mr.  Arnold  always  at  our  elbow  to 
apply,  or  rectify,  or  suspend  his  own  test.  His 
intuitive  perception  of  what  is  excellent  in  poetry, 
and  what  is  not  excellent,  may  be  so  trustworthy  that 


Definition  of  Poetry.  xix 

it  enables  him  to  dispense  with  his  own  formula;  but 
less  gifted  or  cultured  persons  are  driven  to  inquire 
whether  it  cannot  be  replaced  by  a  better. 

Mr.  Arnold  goes  astray  at  the  outset  in  seeking  a 
definition  of  poetry  by  reference  to  the  judging 
faculty.  Criticism  of  life  is  not  primarily  or  dis- 
tinctively the  function  of  the  poet.  If  it  were,  man- 
kind would  have  been  wrong  in  placing  Aristotle, 
Plato,  Epicurus  in  one  category,  and  Homer,  Sopho- 
cles, Pindar  in  another.  There  is  no  criticism  of  life 
better  than  that  of  Bacon's  Essays,  yet  these  are  not 
poetry  at  all.  Professor  Huxley  was  right,  on  the 
other  hand,  when,  one  day  lately  at  Birmingham,  he 
claimed  for  science  a  place  of  importance  in  the 
criticism  of  life.  Doubtless — and  the  remark  is  of 
moment — criticism  of  life  is  involved  in  poetry,  but 
it  is  not  distinctive  of  poetry,  it  belongs  to  prose  as 
well  as  to  poetry. 

The  fundamental  idea  on  which  a  sound  and  a  prac- 
tically useful  definition  of  poetry  may  be  based  will  be 
found  indicated  by  Wordsworth  himself.  In  the 
beginning  of  his  sonnet  to  the  painter,  Haydon,  are 
these  words  : 

High  is  our  calling,  Friend  ! — Creative  Art 
(Whether  the  instrument  of  words  she  use, 
Or  pencil  pregnant  with  ethereal  hues). 

Poetry  is  that  branch  of  creative  art  which  works 
in  and  with  harmonious  words.  The  essential  cha- 
racteristic of  all  art  is  that  it  makes  something  ; 
the  arts  distinctively  called  useful  serving  the  body, 

c 


xx  Poetry. 

the  arts  distinctively  called  fine  serving  the  soul. 
Science  looks  upon  the  universe  and  asks  what  is 
the  relation  between  its  parts,  what  are  its  pro- 
cesses of  change,  what  is  going  on  beneath  its  sur- 
face. Art  looks  out  upon  nature  and  upon  man, 
rejoicing  in  the  vision ;  essays  to  imitate,  to  re- 
present it ;  and,  from  its  materials,  visions  forth  a 
world  of-  man's  own,  the  world  of  music,  sculpture, 
painting,  poetry.  A  simple  and  adequate  principle 
of  classification  and  distinction  between  these  is 
obtained  by  reference  to  the  materials  with  which 
they  work.  Poetry  is  the  most  spiritual  and  the 
liighest  of  the  arts ;  by  the  more  than  magical  spell 
of  words,  she  makes  all  other  arts  her  vassals.  ~ 

Aristotle  traces  poetry  to  imitation ;  Bacon,  in 
dealing  with  the  same  subject,  lays  stress  upon  ima- 
gination. There  is  beyond  question,  as  Professor 
Masson  has  pointed  out,  a  certain  antithetic  opposi- 
tion in  their  ways  of  viewing  the  matter ;  but  there  is, 
I  submit,  a  still  deeper  agreement.  Aristotle  himself 
affords  the  hint  on  which  a  reconciliation  between 
their  views  can  be  effected.  The  poet,  he  says,  may 
imitate  in  one  of  three  ways — showing  men  better  than 
they  are,  worse  than  they  are,  or  as  they  are.  The 
first  of  these — Homer's  way — he  describes  as  pro- 
ducing the  noblest  poetry  ;  and  this  is  obviously  what 
Bacon  would  have  called  the  imaginative,  the  improv- 
ing, the  idealising  poetry. 

I  discussed  this  matter  very  carefully  a  good  many 
years  ago,  and  I  may  be  permitted  to  quote  from  my- 


Imitation.  xxi 


self  some  sentences  relating  to  the  importance  of  the 
instinct  of  imitation,  as  giving  the  initiative  in  art.  "  It 
was  characteristic  of  the  unimpassioned  and  comprehen- 
sive observation,  the  strong  sense,  and  the  masculine 
•simplicity  of  Aristotle,  to  make  this  instinct  his  start- 
ing-point in  his  theory  of  poetry.  In  so  doing,  he 
virtually  recorded  the  suffrages  of  the  great  mass  of 
mankind.  I  once  had  an  opportunity  of  observing 
the  play  of  the  great  human  instinct  of  imitation  in  a 
fresh  and  interesting  manner.  I  was  in  conversation 
with  a  mechanic,  on  board  a  steamer,  in  one  of  the 
most  magnificent  estuaries  of  our  island.  My  com- 
panion was  a  rough-hewn,  sturdy,  hard-working  man, 
thoroughly  read,  as  very  many  of  our  mechanics  are, 
in  the  political  history  of  the  day,  but  who  had  pro- 
bably reflected  little,  or  not  at  all,  on  theories  of  art. 
The  time  was  summer,  and  the  general  tone  of  the 
landscape  was  that  of  still  grandeur  and  majestic 
calm.  The  atmosphere,  though  cloudless,  was  suf- 
fused with  faint  vapour,  and  bathed  the  prospect  in  a 
pale  brilliancy  of  light.  From  right  and  left  the 
mountains  stooped  undulating  to  the  bay,  the  tint  of 
their  green,  softened  by  the  pearly  veil  of  air,  melting 
into  the  amethystine  floor  of  sea.  One  or  two  yachts, 
slim  and  graceful,  cleft  tenderly  the  glistening  ripples, 
amid  the  general  serenity  of  radiance,  like  maidens 
stepping  delicately  in  the  dance  to  the  mild  music '  of 
the  breeze.  The  combination  of  splendour  with  a 
certain  faintness  and  pallor  in  the  aspect  of  the  scene 
— as  if  nature,  oppressed  with  light,  had  grown 

c— 2 


xxii  Poetry. 

languid  in  this  hour  of  Pan — was  somewhat  remark- 
able. My  admiration  was  awakened,  and  I  called  the 
attention  of  my  fellow-passenger  to  the  beauty  of  the 
prospect.  He  expressed  sympathy  with  my  feelings, 
but  passed  instantly  to  another  emotion,  which  was 
called  forth  more  vividly  in  his  own  breast.  He  spoke 
of  the  keen  desire,  instantly  experienced  by  the  be- 
holder, to  copy  such  a  picture.  The  pleasure  he  had 
in  possession,  arising  from  his  sensibility  to  the  beauty 
of  the  scene  before  him,  was  evidently  slight  in  his 
estimation,  compared  with  that  pleasure  at  which  he 
conceptively  grasped  in  reproducing  it  for  himself." 

The  artist  is,  first  of  all,  the  man  who,  awakening 
to  the  world  of  nature  in  his  youth,  is  stirred  by 
irrepressible  longing  to  take  some  copy  of  it,  to  repro- 
duce its  sights  or  its  sounds,  to  express  the  feelings 
and  thoughts  it  calls  forth  within  him,  to  fashion f 
produce,  create  from  its  materials  a  something,  be  it  a, 
statue,  be  it  a  landscape,  be  it  an  epic  poem,  be  it  a. 
lyric  song,  which  he  can  call  his  own,  a  something  on 
which  his  spirit  shall  look  with  unique  and  ravishing- 
gladness,  as  a  man  looks  upon  his  first-born  son.  It 
is  this  impulse  that  makes  the  future  Mrs.  Browning" 
flood  her  father's  parsonage  with  her  singing  before 
she  is  eight  years  old.  It  is  this  impulse  that  sends 
the  idle  boy  from  the  noisy  crowd  of  his  playfellows 
up  into  the  still  pavilion  of  a  leafy  tree,  where, 
literally  like  a  bird  among  the  boughs,  he  may  pour 
forth  reams  of  puerile  verse.  It  is  this  impulse 
which  sets  the  keen-eyed,  nimble-fingered  child, 


The  Criterion.  xxiii 


William  Turner,  to  scratch  copies  of  everything  he 
sees,  if  only  with  a  pin  on  a  pewter  plate,  and  which, 
when  power  has  yielded  to  age,  and  the  eye  is  becom- 
ing filmed,  makes  him  still  insist  on  having,  by  the 
bed  on  which  he  lies  dying,  the  pigments  and  the 
pencils  that  remind  him  of  the  glorious  sovereignty 
of  his  art. 

In  seeking,  therefore,  a  practically  useful  criterion 
of  greatness,  of  excellence,  of  degree  of  merit  in 
poetry,  we  are  not  to  ask,  in  the  first  place,  how  the 
poet  in  question  criticises  life,  but  how  much  of  nature 
and  life  he  reproduces,  and  whether  he  reproduces 
greatly  or  not  greatly;  only  in  the  second  place,  as 
having  a  highly  important  bearing  on  the  general 
character  and  quality  of  his  poetry,  are  we  to  inquire 
into  his  criticism  of  life. 

This  criterion  has  the  advantage  of  exceeding  prac- 
ticality. It  is  derived  from  a  broad  view,  first  of  all 
art  and  then  of  poetry.  Any  one  can  apply  it. 
Glance,  for  example,  at  those  whom  the  world  has 
decided  to  enthrone  as  the  greatest  of  poets.  Homer 
embodies  in  the  Iliad  a  whole  form  of  civilisation, 
a  long  since  vanished  type  of  manners,  usages,  beliefs, 
feelings,  relations.  From  Olympus,  where  the  upper 
ten,  or  rather  the  upper  twelve,  of  heaven  sit  on 
their  golden  three-legged  stools,  and  Zeus  keeps  the 
universe  with  ease,  and  his  wife  with  difficulty,  at 
bay,  and  the  celestial  meal  is  enlivened  by  inex- 
tinguishable laughter  at  the  limping  Hephaistos,  to 
the  shore  where  the  black  ships  of  the  Achaians  are 


xxiv  Poetry. 

drawn  up,  and  dogs  and  vultures  are  feeding  on  the 
pestilential  corpses  that  taint  the  carnp,  and  the  king 
of  men  and  the  prince  of  heroes  are  engaging  in  a, 
fierce  brawl  about  a  stolen  girl,  and  Ther sites  is 
railing,  and  Nestor  is  praising  the  past,  and  Chryses- 
is  harping  on  his  daughter,  all  that  stirring  world 
is  vividly  present  to  us.  It  is  ideal,  visionary,  painted 
on  the  mind's  retina  by  the  miracle-working  power  of 
Homer's  imagination  ;  and  yet  the  personages  in  the 
scene  are  intensely  real,  the  human  character,  whether 
seen  under  Olympian  conditions  or  those  of  mortality, 
is  utterly  true  to  the  human  character  of  to-day. 

Dante  is  another  of  the  poets  whose  work  is  uni- 
versally acknowledged  to  be  of  sovereign  excellence. 
His  great  poem  represents  a  succession  of  regions 
peopled  with  human  creatures,  displaying  an  immense 
variety  of  character  and  passion.  The  mediaeval  age 
is  almost  as  comprehensively,  almost  as  graphically, 
portrayed  in  the  Divine  Comedy  as  the  heroic  age  of 
Greece  is  portrayed  in  the  Iliad.  Once  more,  Shake- 
speare brings  to  the  actual  world  of  his  time  a  more 
subtle  and  penetrating  observation,  a  more  compre- 
hensive sympathy,  a  mightier  imagination  than  either 
Homer  or  Dante,  and  the  world  of  his  art  embraces 
a  still  larger  number  of  typical  characters,  a  still 
wider  vision  of  human  affairs  and  human  life  than 
theirs. 

It  is  interesting,  and  can  hardly  be  uninstructive,  to 
observe  that  Keats,  himself  a  fine  poet  and  critic, 
instinctively  contemplates  the  work  of  poets  from  the 


How  to  Apply  the  Test.  xxv 

point  of  view  I  have  been  suggesting.  Excellent 
poems  are,  for  him,  "  goodly  states  and  kingdoms," 
"islands,"  "  which  bards  in  fealty  to  Apollo  hold." 
He  had  heard  of  the  spacious  realm  that  owned  the 
sway  of  Homer ;  but  he  had  not  really  known  it  till 
Chapman  revealed  it  to  him.  Was  it  then  a  new 
"  criticism  of  life,"  or  a  new  world  bodied  forth  to  the 
eye  of  imagination,  that  he  was  aware  of? 

Then  felt  I  like  some  watcher  of  the  skies, 
When  a  new  planet  swims  into  his  ken. 

In  applying  our  test,  it  will  be  conducive  to  intelli- 
gence and  perspicuity  to  distinguish  the  two  elements- 
which  it  embraces,  to  wit,  what  the  poet  takes  from 
nature,  and  what  the  poet  gives  to  nature.  The  spirit 
of  man  creates  nothing  out  of  nothing,  and  it  will  be 
found  that  the  quality  and  value  of  what  a  poet  pro- 
duces depend  upon  the  power  with  which  he  can  ob- 
serve, and  upon  the  richness  of  the  materials  which  are 
used  by  his  imagination  in  its  constructions.  In  the 
actual  exercise  of  the  poetic  gift,  the  two  processes — 
observation,  imagination — may  go  together  in  the 
same  moment  of  time,  and  the  exact  relation  between 
the  two,  in  any  case  of  high  and  original  production, 
is  too  subtle  for  analysis;  but  both  are  necessarily 
present,  and  very  useful  suggestions  as  to  the  order  of 
greatness  in  which  poets  are  to  be  classified  may  be 
derived  from  simply  considering  what  they  chiefly 
observe,  what  supremely  interests  and  delights  them. 

Poets  of  one  class  observe  the  beauties  of  nature 
with  exquisite  accuracy,  but  have,  comparatively 


xx  vi  Poetry. 

speaking,  no  hold  upon  the  interests,  passions, 
thoughts,  activities  of  men.  These  poets  love  colour 
for  its  own  sake,  form  for  its  own  sake,  and  are 
consummate  in  execution.  With  the  warring,  the 
working,  the  passionate  loving,  of  the  dusty  throng 
around  them,  they  have  little  sympathy  ;  from  hu- 
manity they  ask  only  such  lovely  tints  and  hues  as 
may  afford  play  to  their  artistic  skill.  Their  highest 
name,  perhaps,  is  Keats.  In  delicate  felicity  of  execu- 
tion his  work  will  challenge  comparison  with  any  the 
world  ever  saw.  Shakespeare  himself  cannot  excel 
him  in  his  own  walk.  But  he  cares  little  for  common 
interests,  common  feelings,  common  life.  A  hundred 
generations  of  fighting  men  have  thrilled  to  the  harp, 
or  to  echoes  from  the  harp,  of  Homer.  The  grey- 
haired  farmer,  as  he  harnesses  his  old  mare,  thinks  of 
the  genial  notes  of  Burns.  The  furnaceman,  as  he 
groans  and  sweats,  is  happier  because  Schiller  sang 
the  song  of  the  bell.  But  what  ploughman  or  black- 
smith ever  heard  the  name  of  Keats  ?  what  carpenter, 
as  he  plied  adze  or  hammer,  what  fisherman,  as  he 
furled  his  sail,  ever  murmured  a  ditty  of  the  London 
School?  They  are  experts  writing  for  experts. 

But  the  power  of  fresh  and  vivid  delineation  of 
beautiful  objects  in  nature  is  a  true  mark  of  poetical 
genius.  If,  indeed,  we  might  venture  on  any  one 
assertion  respecting  the  poets  of  all  climes  and 
periods,  it  would  be  that  they  had  a  sense  of  keen 
enjoyment  in  the  beauties  of  nature.  Homer  did 
not  describe  particular  flowers,  or  dwell  upon  the 


Nature's  Beauty.  xxvii 

features  of  a  landscape  for  their  own  sake ;  but  there 
is  a  pervasive  feeling  of  the  open  air  in  his  poetry, 
and  he  is  constantly  referring  to  the  sea,  or  to 
starry  nights,  and  knows  better  than  any  London  or 
Lake  poet  the  proper  office  of  flowers  to  heighten,  by 
gush  of  sympathetic  radiance,  the  impassioned  joy  of 
lovers.  In  modern  poetry,  however,  this  gift  of 
graphic  presentation  of  the  beauty  of  nature  plays  a 
much  more  important  part  than  in  ancient  poetry ; 
and,  though  it  may  be  in  excess,  and  may  thus  offend 
a  masculine  taste,  its  presence  must  be  pronounced 
indispensable  to  all  poetry  that  will  satisfy  the  de- 
mands of  modern  readers.  The  more  artificial  society 
becomes,  the  more  we  are  pent  up  in  smoke-darkened 
cities,  the  more  enchanting,  probably,  will  be  those 
talismanic  touches  whereby  the  poet  suddenly  wafts 
us  into  far-away  woods,  or  places  us  again  on  the  hill- 
side or  the  river-brink  where  we  played  in  childhood. 
Nature  being,  to  all  practical  intents,  infinite,  the 
secret  of  freshness  in  describing  her  beauties  lies  in 
the  habit  of  first-hand  observation.  If  you  watch  the 
breakers  as  they  crash  on  the  shore  when  the  scour  of 
the  receding  wave  suddenly  takes  their  feet  from  under 
them,  if  you  try  to  count  and  name  the  colours  of  the 
stranded  foam  in  full  sunlight,  while  the  breeze  passes 
over  it,  fluttering  its  myriad  emeralds  and  rubies  and 
amethysts  and  topazes,  if  you  note  the  character- 
istic groupings  and  humours  of  the  clouds  in  any 
one  locality,  you  will  find  that  no  poet  or  painter 
can  exhaust  nature's  variety.  It  would  not  be  easy 


xxviii  Poetry. 


to  find  a  better  example  of  that  kind  of  description 
by  which  modern  poets  bring  nature's  facts  not  only 
to  the  eye,  but  to  the  ear,  than  we  have  in  Mr. 
Arnold's  admirable  poem  on  Dover  Beach. 

Come  to  the  window,  sweet  is  the  night  air  ! 

Only,  from  the  long  line  of  spray 

Where  the  ebb  meets  the  moon -blanch 'd  sand, 

Listen  !  you  hear  the  grating  roar 

Of  pebbles  which  the  waves  suck  back,  and  fling, 

At  their  return,  up  the  high  strand, 

Begin,  and  cease,  and  then  again  begin, 

With  tremulous  cadence  slow,  and  bring 

The  eternal  note  of  sadness  in. 

We  may  be  sure  that  no  man  who  has  not  this  eye 
for  nature  will  obtain  recognition  and  honour  among 
modern  poets ;  it  is  more,  perhaps,  from  the  deadness 
of  their  sense  on  this  side  than  from  any  other  charac- 
teristic that  Dry  den,  Pope,  Johnson  are  firmly  and 
unanimously  denied  the  distinctive  glory  of  poets  by 
the  present  generation.  The  lilies  of  the  field  are  in 
array  against  them.  They  have  said  no  tender,  heart- 
felt things,  instinct  with  music,  about  the  birds  and 
the  brooks.  Not  one  of  those  splendidly  clever,  keenly 
intellectual  men,  felt  about  a  daisy  like  Chaucer  or 
like  Burns.  I  do  not  believe  that  any  one  of  them 
had  such  delight  in  the  sea,  and  the  stars,  and  in  green 
meadows,  as  old  Homer.  It  has  become  second  nature 
with  us  to  exact  from  our  poets,  as  an  indispensable 
pledge  of  tenderness,  sweetness,  melodiousness,  that 
they  shall  take  us  with  them  to  the  country. 

Poetry,  viewed  in  relation  to  the  poet,  is  lan- 
guage uttered  under  the  influence  of  that  glow  of 


The  Poetic  Glow.  xxix 


the  spirit  which  renders  it  picture  to  the  eye  and 
music  to  the  ear.  The  poetic  product  may  be  a  little 
thing  or  a  great  thing,  a  lyric  or  an  epic,  a  single 
vase  or  a  town  with  all  its  towers ;  but  now,  as  in  the 
days  of  Orpheus  and  Amphion,  it  arises  before  the 
eye,  and  it  arises  to  strains  of  music.  The  poet  re- 
joices in  his  work.  No  word  is  truer  than  this : 

What  poets  feel  not,  when  they  make, 

A  pleasure  in  creating, 
The  world,  in  its  turn,  will  not  take 

Pleasure  in  contemplating. 

Mr.  Matthew  Arnold  gives  this  as  a  caution  to  poets; 
I  respectfully  suggest  that  it  may  be  useful  also  as  a. 
caution  to  critics  who  are  tempted  to  think  that  poetry 
can  be  denned  as  criticism  of  life. 

Music  is  the  mother-tongue  of  joy — nature's  mode 
of  expressing  rapture  in  sentient  beings.  Science  has- 
in  these  last  times  taught  us  to  compare  and  connect 
nature's  methods  with  each  other  throughout  all  the 
families  of  life ;  and  we  now  know  to  be  a  fact,  what 
might  formerly  have  passed  for  a  mere  flourish  of 
rhetoric,  that  the  nightingale  illuminating  the  night 
of  the  spring  woods  with  song  is  a  lyric  poet,  and 
that,  by  fundamentally  the  same  law  that  sets  the 
nightingale  singing,  the  fountains  of  exultant  power, 
of  joyful  sympathy,  of  delight  in  nature,  of  affection 
for  man,  overflow  in  the  poet  in  melodious  words. 

The  poetic  glow  is,  of  course,  like  all  the  most 
important  facts,  a  mystery.  To  analyse  it  into  its 
elements,  to  understand  and  classify  its  methods  of 


xxx  Poetry. 

operation,  may  well  be  beyond  us.  What  criticism, 
modestly  observant  of  the  workings  of  genius,  can 
do  is  to  distinguish  a  few  of  its  more  notable 
•characteristics. 

One  of  these,  first  perhaps  in  the  order  of  im- 
portance and  distinctiveness,  is  its  tendency  to  make 
the  poet  view  all  things  as  alive.  If  the  reader 
has  not  remarked  this  unique  quality  of  poetic 
genius,  he  will  be  surprised  to  observe  its  uni- 
versality, and  the  sharpness  with  which  it  divides  the 
most  accomplished  versifier  from  the  poet.  It  is 
more  or  less  an  accident  whether  the  poet  writes  in 
the  form  of  verse  or  the  form  of  prose,  but  be  sure,  if 
he  is  a  poefc,  that  he  scatters  largesse  of  life  abroad 
upon  creation.  If  he  is  not  a  poet,  he  cannot  do  this. 
He  may  array  his  figures  with  exquisite  taste,  adorn 
them  with  jewels,  crown  them  with  gold;  but  they  will 
be  wooden  figures  after  all.  He  may  apostrophise 
flowers  and  trees  :  he  may  speak  very  finely  about  the 
whisperings  of  Windsor  Forest  and  the  tuneful  gliding 
of  the  Thames  ;  but  he  does  not — Pope,  for  example, 
does  not — in  the  least  believe  in  his  own  illusion.  Mr. 
Buskin,  on  the  other  hand,  though  he  unfortunately 
abandoned  the  metrical  forms  which  he  used  in  boy- 
.hood  with  richly  promising  skill,  constantly  betrays 
the  essentially  poetical  character  of  his  mind  by  giving 
life  to  all  he  loves,  to  all  that  intensely  interests  him. 
The  crossing  ripples  of  the  tidal  wave  advancing  on  the 
shore  are  for  him  children  kissing  and  clapping  hands ; 
the  mountain  flowers  come  forth  to  his  eye,  "  crowded 


Poetic  Life.  xxxi 


for  very  love,"  crushing  their  leaves  into  strange  shapes 
"  only  to  be  nearer  each  other;  "  and  the  delicate  pines 
"follow  each  other  along  the  soft  hill-ridges  up  and 
down."  Homer  knew  perfectly  well  that  the  mortality 
in  the  Greek  camp  spoken  of  in  the  first  book  of  the 
Iliad  was  occasioned  by  disease  arising  from  the  heat 
of  the  sun,  and  that  dogs  and  men,  dying  of  plague, 
are  not  struck  with  arrows.  He  speaks  expressly  of 
disease.  And  yet,  with  the  glow  of  poetic  vision  and 
creative  imagination  in  heart  and  brain,  he  sees,  and 
cannot  help  seeing,  Apollo,  the  angry  sun-god,  striding 
along  the  mountains,  the  silver  arrows  in  his  quiver 
clanging  behind  him  as  he  moves,  and  taking  up  his 
position  opposite  the  Greek  camp,  and  bending  his 
bow.  Shelley  gives  life  to  winter,  making  it  a  colossal 
giant,  with  the  wind  for  a  whip. 

He  had  torn  the  cataracts  from  the  hills, 
And  they  clanked  at  his  girdle  like  manacles. 

Shelley's  sensitive  plant  is  as  alive  as  one  of  Kuskin's 
pines,  and  nature  becomes  beautifully  and  tenderly 
alive  around  her. 

A  sensitive  plant  in  a  garden  grew, 
The  young  winds  fed  her  with  silver  dew, 
And  she  opened  her  fan-like  leaves  to  the  light, 
And  closed  them  beneath  the  kisses  of  night. 

He  who  has  not  this  life-giving  power  is  no  poet ;  he 
who  possesses  it,  appearing  from  the  fact  of  his  pos- 
sessing it  to  be  either  inspired  or  a  maniac,  as  we  inter- 
pret his  symptoms,  is  a  poet.  If  he  is  a  great  poet,  he 
gives  life  to  men,  he  dowers  his  Achilles  or  his  Hector 


xxxii  Poetry. 

with  an  immortality  that  will  be  fresh  when  Cheops 
and  his  pyramid  are  "blown  about  the  desert  dust ;  " 
if  he  is  a  true  but  not  a  great-  poet,  he  cannot,  imagi- 
natively, give  life  to  men,  but  he  fancifully  gives  life  to 
a  thousand  inanimate  things :  in  all  cases,  where  there 
is  no  life  there  is  no  poetry,  where  there  is  the  life  of 
fancy  there  is  true  poetry,  where  there  is  the  life  of 
imagination  there  is  great  poetry. 

If  now  we  glance  back  at  those  lines  quoted  by  Mr. 
Arnold  from  Wordsworth,  and  pronounced  by  him  to 
be  inferior  poetry,  we  shall,  I  think,  find  grounds  for 
considering  them  such  without  reference  to  their 
quality  as  criticism  of  life.  What  they  want  is  not 
critical  depth  or  accuracy  in  dissertating  on  life,  but 
life  itself.  They  have  the  calculating  self-possession 
of  prose ;  the  eye  of  the  writer,  as  he  gravely  recites 
them,  is  not  dilated  and  inflamed  by  the  ecstasy  of 
poetic  vision.  England  is  an  "  Imperial  Eealm."  A 
geographical,  political,  thoroughly  prosaic  expression  ! 
Turn  to  Milton's  prose,  often  grander  in  its  rhythm 
than  his  verse,  and  note  how  he  gives  imaginative  life 
to  England,  whether,  as  an  eagle  mewing  her  mighty 
youth,  or  as  a  veiled  mother  weeping  for  her  banished 
children,  and  learn  the  difference  between  genuine 
poetic  work  and  those  lines  which  Mr.  Arnold  quotes 
from  Wordsworth.  Applying  our  principle  to  the 
three  lines  quoted  from  Shakespeare,  we  find  that  they 
are  a  vivid  picture,  the  mind's  eye  of  the  dullest  reader 
being  compelled  to  see  the  ship-boy  on  the  giddy  mast, 
rocked  in  the  cradle  of  the  surge,  while  sleep  draws 


Metrical  Form.  xxxiii 


near  to  him.  a  subtle,  mysterious,  living  thing,  to  lull 
him  into  fatal  slumber.  This  is  faultless  poetry, 
though  perhaps  it  shows  Shakespeare  in  his  highest 
fanciful  rather  than  in  his  strictly  imaginative  power ; 
but  I  do  not  see  how,  as  a  criticism  of  life,  any  high 
value  can  be  attached  to  the  lines. 

It  will  probably  be  felt,  and  justly  felt,  by  practical 
readers,  that  criticism  is  bound  to  give  a  more  precise 
account  than  I  have  yet  attempted  of  the  association 
between  poetry  and  metrical  form.  Though  poetry 
may  occur  in  the  form  of  prose,  it  never  occurs  with- 
out cadence,  without  rhythmic  swell  and  melody,  in 
one  word,  without  tune  ;  and  verse  is  its  legitimate,  its 
consummate  form.  The  poet  who  writes  in  prose  has 
never  succeeded  in  "  beating  his  music  out."  Perfect 
verse,  then,  is  the  most  precious  and  enchanting  illus- 
trative instance  that  exists,  of  that  law  of  modulated 
continuity,  of  measured  progression,  of  ordered  move- 
ment, of  living  balance  and  symmetry,  which  pervades 
nature.  The  expansion  and  contraction  of  the  lungs 
in  respiration,  the  beat  of  the  pulse,  the  rise  and  fall 
of  rippling  waves,  the  succession  of  leaves  on  the 
branch,  the  lull  and  swell  in  gales,  are  cases  in  which 
the  law  is  observed.  The  earliest  dawn  of  art,  in  the 
strict  sense,  as  distinguished  from  mere  compliance 
with  the  demands  of  animal  nature,  is  in  law  and 
order.  The  savage  who  covers  his  water-jug  with  con- 
fused scratches,  not  for  any  pleasure  they  give  him,  but 
in  sheer  vacancy  of  mind,  has  not  made  the  first  step 
in  fine  art ;  but  when  he  draws  a  steady  line  round  its 


xxxiv  Poetry. 

neck,  or  two  lines  parallel  to  each  other,  or  zigzag 
lines  in  a  definite  order,  he  is  on  the  threshold  of  art ; 
and  when  he  puts  one  broad  line  in  the  middle,  and 
two  thin  lines,  one  on  each  side,  or  remarks  that  a 
curved  line  becomes  more  interesting  from  being 
opposed  to  a  straight  line,  then  he  has  struck  upon 
that  leading  principle  of  all  composition,  contrast,  and 
is  prepared  to  grapple  with  the  problem  that  presents 
itself  to  artists  in  every  province,  the  combination  of 
breadth  with  variety.  The  earliest  efforts  in  poetry 
and  in  music — the  two  probably  went  together — were 
doubtless  of  a  kind  corresponding  to  those  rude  yet 
ordered  lines  and  zigzags  which  we  find  on  prehistoric 
pottery, — lilts  in  which  the  low,  sweet  monotone  was 
suddenly  interrupted  by  the  shrill  notes  of  surprise, 
delight,  or  apostrophe.  Speech  in  all  races,  though 
custom  may  have  dulled  our  ears  to  its  apprehension, 
proceeds  with  more  or  less  of  wave-motion,  associated 
with  respiration  and  the  correlated  physical  conditions ; 
and  when  there  is  strong  and  noble  emotion  the  wave- 
measure  becomes  more  marked,  the  tones  more  full, 
melodious,  and  thrilling.  Poetry  in  its  purest  form — 
which  I  agree  with  Mr.  Pater  in  holding  lyrical  poetry 
to  be — has  always  been  directly  associated  with  music, 
and  the  primeval  bard  was  doubtless  a  singer.  In  all 
impassioned  feeling  there  is  pitch,  modulation,  corre- 
spondence between  the  feeling  and  the  sound.  "  In 
the  spring  a  fuller  crimson  comes  upon  the  robin's 
breast."  That  is  one  of  nature's  arrangements.  In 
the  spring  a  deeper,  clearer,  more  melodious  rapture 


The  Song-element.  xxxv 

comes  into  the  nightingale's  voice.  That  again  is  one 
of  nature's  facts.  In  all  the  spring-tides  of  human 
emotion,  in  the  elevation  of  intense  and  noble 
sympathy  with  all  great  human  interests,  the  passion 
of  the  feeling  announces  itself  both  in  the  colour  and 
the  modulation  of  the  speech, — picture,  as  I  said 
before,  unfolding  itself  to  music. 

When,  therefore,  Mr.  Carlyle,  in  his  epoch-making 
essay  on  Burns,  laid  stress  upon  the  test  of  melody  as 
enabling  us  to  discriminate  between  prose  and  poetry, 
between  eloquence  and  song,  he  put  his  finger  on  one 
of  those  truths  which  ought  not  to  be  forgotten  or  dis- 
carded ;  and  Mr.  Matthew  Arnold,  in  referring  us  to 
true  and  serious,  noble  and  profound,  criticism  of  life 
as  a  criterion  of  poetical  excellence,  does  not  take  us 
beyond  the  point  to  which  Carlyle  conducted  us,  but 
back  from  it.  Edgar  Poe  was  very  right  when  he  said 
that  a  good  off-hand  way  of  gauging  the  poetical 
quality  of  verse  was  to  write  it  in  form  of  prose,  and 
try  whether  it  still  forced  us  to  feel  that  it  was  poetry. 
Of  lyrical  poetry  it  may,  I  think,  be  stated  universally 
that,  if  the  reader  does  not  feel  himself  under  some 
impulse  to  sing  or  chant  it — if  he  can  recite  it  with 
perfect  comfort  while  taking  no  account  of  the  division 
into  metrical  feet  or  into  lines — it  is  not  good  lyric 
poetry.  You  feel  the  song-element  in  this  of  Victor 

Hugo  : 

Je  suis  le  Cid  calme  et  sombre, 

Je  n'achete  ni  ne  vend, 
Et  je  n'ai  sur  moi  que  1'ombre 
De  la  main  de  Dieu  vivant. 


xxxvi  Poetry. 


The  attainment  of  perfect  modulation  will  imply  choice 
of  the  most  picturesque  and  expressive  words,  and  it  is- 
characteristic  of  a  young  poet  that  such  words  have  a 
charm  for  him  and  are  hoarded  in  his  memory.  Of 
such  precious  stones  his  poetical  architecture  will  be 
built.  The  melody  and  charm  of  the  verse  are 
heightened  also,  not  only  by  just  and  powerful 
thought  and  by  noble  feeling,  but  by  every  one  of  a 
thousand  nameless  touches  and  tones  of  association,  by 
which  the  poetical  fancy  and  the  poetical  imagination, 
working  with  all  the  spells  of  remembered  fact  and 
metaphorical  enhancement,  can  suggest  pleasant  places 
and  happy  hours.  All  nature  is  a  harp  for  the  poetical 
imagination,  and  by  an  apt  metaphor,  or  assemblage 
of  metaphors,  the  emotion  which  the  poet  expresses  is 
suddenly  and  transcendently  excited. 

The  pale  moon  is  setting  beyond  the  white  wave, 
And  time  is  setting  wi'  me. 

No  words  can  measure  the  heightening  of  the  impres- 
sion of  sadness  wrought  by  such  a  tone  of  nature's 
music  as  that. 

The  moonshine,  stealing  o'er  the  scene, 

Had  blended  with  the  lights  of  eve, 
And  she  was  there,  my  hope,  my  joy, 
My  own  dear  Genevieve. 

Here  it  is  the  serene  exaltation  of  intensest  joy  that 
is  expressed,  and  again  the  power  of  the  metaphoric 
spell  is  beyond  all  measuring.  A  single  line  will  show 
that  a  man  has  the  poet's  ear  for  melodious  words, — 

Sweet  closes  the  evening  on  Craigie-burn  wood. 
The  charm  of  true  poetry  is  a  subtle,  complex,  and 


Wordsivortli.  xxxvii 


unique  charm,  having  many  elements ;  but  it  depends 
mainly  on  this,  that  it  combines  the  intense  delight- 
fulness  of  law  with  the  intense  delightfulness  of  free- 
dom. Law  is  charming,  even  in  zigzag  lines ;  how 
much  more,  then,  in  the  wave-like,  star-like  movement 
of  perfect  verse  :  freedom  is  charming,  even  in  the  frolic 
wind  or  flying  cloud ;  how  much  more  in  the  bounding 
ecstasy  of  lyric  song. 

Mr.  Arnold,  illustrating  his  principles  of  poetical 
criticism  by  an  example  of  their  application,  under- 
takes to  prove  Wordsworth  superior  to  any  poet 
that  appeared  in  Europe  between  the  death  of 
Milton  and  the  rise  of  poets  still  living,  with  the 
single  exception  of  Goethe.  Victor  Hugo  he  specifi- 
cally includes  among  the  poets  to  whom  Wordsworth 
is  superior.  To  this  decision  I  by  no  means  assent ; 
and  we  cannot  have  better  practice  in  the  use  of 
those  tests  which  we  have  been  endeavouring  to  frame 
than  in  examining  this  claim  on  behalf  of  Words- 
worth put  forward  by  his  adroit  and  gifted  advocate. 

Mr.  Arnold  dwells  upon  "  the  extraordinary  power 
with  which  Wordsworth  feels  the  joy  offered  to  us  in 
nature,  the  joy  offered  to  us  in  the  simple  primary 
affections  and  duties,"  and  "  the  extraordinary  power 
with  which,  in  case  after  case,  he  shows  us  this  joy, 
and  renders  it  so  as  to  make  us  share  it."  This  is  "  the 
cause  "  of  the  "  greatness  "  of  Wordsworth's  poetry. 
"Here,"  says  Mr.  Arnold,  "  is  an  immense  advantage 
for  a  poet." 

Without  question  he  is  a  great  poet  who  shows 

d— 2 


xxxviii  Poetry. 

the  joy  of  simple  affections  and  duties  with  ex- 
traordinary power,  and  makes  his  readers  share  it ; 
"but  I  dispute  the  extraordinary  power  of  the  Words- 
ivorthian  display  of  simple  joy,  and  I  still  more 
-strongly  dispute  the  Wordsworthian  capacity  to 
make  us  share  that  joy.  Wordsworth  has  a  com- 
prehensive and  honest  sense  of  the  pleasantness  of 
nature,  and  can  reproduce  with  accuracy  many  of 
nature's  sights  and  sounds.  No  one  knows  or  shows 
the  pleasure  of  a  fine  day  better  than  Wordsworth. 
But  that  exultation  which  great  poets  have  in  human 
joy,  and  which  certainly  is  a  note  of  great  poetry,  is 
slightly  shared  by  Wordsworth.  I  do  not  deny  that 
there  are  traces  of  it  in  his  works',  but  they  are  few, 
and  there  is  little  depth  or  vehemence  in  their  joy. 
The  power  of  music  to  enrapture  a  street  crowd,  the 
power  of  reverie  to  make  a  country  girl  in  London 
see  a  river  flowing  down  the  vale  of  Cheapside,  the 
power  of  cocks  crowing,  streams  flowing,  small 
birds  twittering,  cattle  feeding,  to  make  a  poet, 
who  has  nothing  to  do  but  to  watch  them,  happy — 
these,  with  some  glad  stanzas  about  the  ethereal  min- 
strelsy of  the  lark,  almost  exhaust  the  joy-producing 
strains  which  Mr.  Arnold  puts  into  the  volume  in 
which  he  embodies  Wordsworth's  main  achievement 
in  poetry.  On  the  other  hand,  how  profoundly  de- 
pressing are  Wordsworth's  poems  generally  !  Mr.  Ar- 
nold speaks  of  simple  joys,  but  the  pieces  he  applauds 
have  no  gleam  of  joy  in  them.  Michael,  The  Brothers, 
Ruth,  Lucy,  Margaret,  and  I  know  not  how  many 


Wordsworth's  Sadness.  xxxix: 

others,  are  unutterably  mournful.  To  step  into  the 
poetic  realms  of  Goethe  or  Schiller  is  to  step  into  a. 
land  of  abounding  life  and  splendour  and,  joy ;  but  to 
walk  with  Wordsworth  is  to  be  sad.  What  poet  has 
said  such  mournful  things?  For  what  poet  are  "  all 
the  ways  of  men  so  vain  and  melancholy ' '  ?  Hera 
is  his  own  account : 

We  poets  in  our  youth  begin  in  gladness ; 

But  thereof  comes  in  the  end  despondency  and  madness. 

He  writes  with  pretty  fancying,  almost  mirthful,, 
about  the  small  celandine  ;  but  once  he  takes  another 
tone,  and  it  seems  to  come  from  a  far  deeper  region 
in  his  soul.  He  had  often  noticed  the  flower  muffling 
itself  up  when  hailstones  were  falling,  and  coming  out 
again  bright  as  the  sun  itself  when  the  storm  was- 
over.  Once,  however,  he  observed  a  change,  and  thus 
describes  what  he  saw  and  what  he  thought : 

But  lately,  one  rough  day,  this  flower  I  passed, 
And  recognised  it,  though  an  altered  form, 

Now  standing  forth  an  offering  to  the  blast, 
And  buffeted  at  will  by  rain  and  storm. 

I  stopped,  and  said,  with  inly-muttered  voice, 
"  It  doth  not  love  the  shower,  nor  seek  the  cold ; 

This  neither  is  its  courage  nor  its  choice, 
But  its  necessity  in  being  old." 

The  weariness  with  which  man  toils  along  in  his 
pilgrimage,  the  dumb  forces  of  nature  always  like 
invisible  enemies  bearing  him  back — the  hopelessness 
of  the  conflict  with  old  age — the  heart-heaviness  and 
desolation  that  overtake  the  honest  Michaels  and 
Margarets,  in  spite  of  their  industry  and  worth — 


xl  Poetry. 

these  are  the  impressions  that  remain  with  one  after 
reading  Wordsworth's  poems.  Of  the  sunlight  of 
exultation  with  which  poets  of  more  humour,  of  more 
jocund  and  mirthful  power,  disperse  or  illumine  the 
mists  that  shroud  the  world,  there  is  in  Wordsworth 
singularly  little.  He  does,  indeed,  rest  upon  the  con- 
solations of  religion.  With  placid  faith,  that  seems 
never  seriously  moved  by  the  sorrows  he  poetically 
describes,  he  trusts  that  the  impotence  of  human 
grieving  will  some  day  be  supplemented  by  Infinite 
Power,  and  that  God  will  mend  all.  This  is  a  very 
great  consolation,  and  in  placing  it,  as  he  does,  in 
many  impressive  lights,  Wordsworth  is,  perhaps,  at 
Ms  best ;  but  this  is  exactly  that  part  of  Words- 
worth's "criticism  of  life"  which  Mr.  Arnold  thinks 
commonplace  and  homiletical. 

Looking  more  particularly  into  Wordsworth's  poet- 
ical workmanship,  I  submit  that  he  adds  less  to 
nature,  exercises  less  of  imaginative  power,  than 
belongs  to  great  poetry.  Mr.  Arnold  takes  a  bold 
course  in  dealing  with  this  part  of  his  subject,  alleging 
that  what  I  must  regard  as  a  fatal  defect  is  a  tran- 
scendent merit.  "  Nature  herself  seems  " — these  are 
his  emphatic  and  eloquent  words — "I  say,  to  take  the 
pen  out  of  his  hand,  and  to  write  for  him  with  her 
own  bare,  sheer,  penetrating  power.  This  arises  from 
two  causes — from  the  profound  sincereness  with  which 
Wordsworth  feels  his  subject,  and  also  from  the  pro- 
foundly sincere  and  natural  character  of  his  subject 
itself.  He  can  and  will  treat  such  a  subject  with 


Wordsworth's  Poetic  Method.  xli 

nothing  but  the  most  plain,  first-hand,  almost  austere 
naturalness.  His  expression  may  often  be  called  bald 
— as,  for  instance,  in  the  poem  of  'Resolution  and  In- 
dependence— but  it  is  bald  as  the  bare  mountain  tops 
are  bald,  with  a  baldness  which  is  full  of  grandeur." 

Is  it  imagination  too  mighty  to  endure  any  but  the 
naked  majesty  of  nature,  or  is  it  sheer  lack  of 
imaginative  power,  that  characterises  Wordsworth's 
poetic  method?  That  is  the  question.  Mr.  Arnold 
tells  us  that  even  he  cannot  read  Vaudracour  and 
Julia.  I  beg  to  ask  why.  The  language  of  the  piece 
is  quite  on  a  level  with  Wordsworth's  usual  writing 

— nay,  unusually  felicitous. 

Oh,  balmy  time, 

In  which  a  love -knot  on  a  lady's  brow 
Is  fairer  than  the  fairest  star  in  heaven  1 

The  following  lines,  on  Vaudracour's  love  for  Julia, 
are  about  as  good  as  you  will  find  anywhere  in  Words- 
worth. 

Earth  breathed  in  one  great  presence  of  the  spring, 

Life  turned  the  meanest  of  her  implements, 

Before  his  eyes,  to  price  above  all  gold ; 

The  house  she  dwelt  in  was  a  sainted  shrine  : 

Her  chamber  window  did  surpass  in  glory 

The  portals  of  the  dawn  ;  all  paradise 

Could,  by  the  simple  opening  of  a  door, 

Let  itself  in  upon  him. 

If  Wordsworth  had  often  expressed  the  joy  of 
noble  passion  with  such  power,  I  should  not  have 
denied  him  a  place  among  those  poets  whose  music 
gladdens  the  world  for  us.  Nevertheless,  Vaudracour 
and  Julia  is,  as  a  whole,  unreadable  even  by  so 


xlii  Poetry. 

fervent  a  Wordsworthian  as  Mr.  Arnold,  and  I  ask 
the  reason  why.  The  secret,  I  am  convinced,  lies- 
in  this — that  it  is  literal  fact — no  more.  The  passion 
of  Vaudracour  for  Julia,  simple,  intense,  generous  „ 
self-forgetting;  the  locust  pride  of  his  family,  eating 
off  every  green  leaf  of  hope,  every  opening  bud  of 
joy,  in  his  bosom  and  hers  ;  the  dismal  end  in  Julia's 
being  immured  in  a  convent,  and  Vaudracour's  be- 
coming a  drivelling  idiot — all  this  is  detailed  with  the 
literal  precision  of  a  transcript  from  nature.  There- 
fore it  is  oppressive  in  the  sense  in  which  a  descrip- 
tion of  any  hideous  calamity,  any  social  horror,  drawn 
out  in  mere  statistical  prose,  is  oppressive — a  news- 
paper account,  for  example,  of  a  woman  found  by  the 
police  sitting,  starved  to  death,  by  a  fireless  grate  in 
winter ;  a  father  taking  his  boy  from  the  house  in 
which  he  is  being  cared  for,  and  hanging  him  up  like 
a  dog ;  a  steamer  run  into  on  the  river,  and  six  hun- 
dred persons  screeching  and  drowning  in  the  water. 
Told  in  the  dreariest  prose,  these  things  affect  us,  but 
not  as  art  affects  us.  There  is  nothing  in  the  bare 

'narrative  of  them  to  impart  that  redeeming  spell 
whereby  imaginative  handling  lends  fascination  to 
i  sorrow,  and  attracts  us  again,  again,  and  yet  again,  to 
contemplate  the  woes  of  Juliet  and  Romeo,  of  Othello 
and  Desdemona,  of  Lear  and  Cordelia,  of  the  chained 
and  vulture-torn  Prometheus. 

Now  you  will  find,  if  you  look,  that  Wordsworth's 
method  in  Vaudracour  and  Julia  is  his  habitual 
method — an  unimaginative  method.  Mr.  Arnold 


Wordsworth's  Imagination.  xliii 

admits  that  a  very  large  proportion  of  Wordsworth's 
work  is  unimaginative.  He  throws  overboard  even  so 
Wordsworthian  and  so  extensive  a  performance  as 
The  Excursion,  But  he  avers  that  Wordsworth's- 
imagination,  when  it  does  awake,  is  extremely  power- 
ful. "No  poet,  perhaps,"  he  says,  "is  so  evidently 
filled  with  a  new  and  sacred  energy  when  the  inspira- 
tion is  upon  him."  I  am  not  prepared  to  deny  that 
the  author  of  The  Affliction  of  Margaret,  Laodamia,  . 
several  of  the  odes,  a  good  many  of  the  sonnets,  and 
some  other  pieces,  was  possessed  of  imagination ;  but 
what  has  most  deeply  impressed  me  in  connection 
with  Wordsworth's  imagination  is  the  rarity  of  its  •' 
awakenings,  and  the  slow  and  grave  character  of  its.  \ 
action  even  when  awake.  No  piece  of  writing  i 
could  be  more  intensely  true  than  The  Affliction 
of  Margaret ;  Wordsworth,  in  that  poem,  gets  into 
the  inmost  recesses  of  a  bereaved  mother's  heart,  and 
only  imagination  could  have  brought  him  there.  The 
fire  of  imagination  burns  his  own  theory  of  imaginative 
expression  to  ashes ;  and  he  makes  the  woman  speak 
to  her  son  in  language  elevated  by  passion  until  it  has- 
more  of  Shakespearean  exaltation  than  of  Words- 
worthian simplicity. 

Perhaps  some  dungeon  hears  thee  groan, 
Maimed,  mangled  by  inhuman  men ; 

Or  thou  upon  a  desert  thrown 
Inheritest  the  lion's  den ; 

Or  hast  been  summoned  to  the  deep, 

Thou,  thou  and  all  thy  mates,  to  keep 

An  incommunicable  sleep. 


xliv  Poetry. 

Deeply  characteristic  of  Wordsworth  is  the  utter 
sadness  of  the  poem — as  if  his  main  conception  of 
man's  lot  were  that  of  painful,  hopeless,  life-long 
breathing  with  a  gravestone  on  the  breast.  Here,  as 
so  often  with  Wordsworth,  there  is  no  help ;  strange 
to  say,  in  this  his  mood  of  deadly  earnestness,  he  per- 
mits to  his  sufferer  no  glimpse  of  light  from  those 
celestial  countries,  from  that  Father's  home,  to  which 
lie  so  often,  and  with  faith  so  placid,  refers. 

I  look  for  ghosts  ;  but  none  will  force 
Their  way  to  me  : — 'tis  falsely  said 

That  there  was  ever  intercourse 
Between  the  living  and  the  dead  ; 

For,  surely,  then  I  should  have  sight 

Of  him  I  wait  for  day  and  night, 

With  love  and  longings  infinite. 

But  to  give  intensely  imaginative  expression  to  a 
single  emotion  cannot  be  pronounced  one  of  the  higher 
efforts  of  poetical  genius ;  and  though  we  admit  that 
Wordsworth  has  given  unsurpassed  expression  to  the 
sorrow  arising  in  connection  with  the  simple  primary 
affections,  we  have  still  to  ask  for  proof  that  he 
deserves  a  lofty  seat  among  those  poetic  sons  of  the 
morning  who  excel  in  the  far  higher  office  of  quicken- 
ing life  and  increasing  joy. 

Estimate  as  you  please,  however,  the  occasional 
imaginative  success  of  Wordsworth,  I  contend  that, 
as  a  general  rule,  his  imagination  fails  expressly  at 
those  points  where  its  interposition  is  required,  and 
that  the  failure  in  Vaudracour  and  Julia,  on  which 
Mr.  Arnold  himself  lays  emphasis,  is  but  a  striking 


Wordsworth's  Literalism.  xlv 

instance  of  what  occurs  in  a  great  variety  of  cases. 
Take  Peter  Bell,  take  The  Waggoner,  nay,  take  Michael 
and  Resolution  and  Independence,  not  to  mention  scores 
of  minor  poems, — I  maintain  that,  in  each  and  all  of 
these,  imagination  fails  to  give  the  right,  vital  unity  of 
art.  An  artist  does  not  produce  a  picture  by  merely 
beginning  at  one  line  on  his  right  and  working  round 
to  another  line  on  his  left.  That  is  a  mere  strip  of 
country  transferred  to  canvas.  The  true  artist  puts 
an  eye,  a  soul,  into  his  landscape,  whether  castellated 
crag,  or  towered  city,  or  sail  on  the  far  horizon  ;  and 
all  his  picture  centres  in  that.  Wordsworth  treats  his 
subject  topographically.  Some  incident  or  series  of 
incidents  has  come  within  the  field  of  his  experience, 
and  he  chronicles  the  details,  beginning  -at  the  begin- 
ning and  going  on  to  the  end.  Peter  Bell  comes  to  the 
river-brink,  observes  the  donkey,  notes  how  its  long 
ear  rolls  round  on  the  pivot  of  its  skull,  discovers  the 
corpse  in  the  water,  mounts  the  ass,  rides  to  the  hut  of 
the  drowned  man,  and  so  forth ;  the  waggoner  drives 
his  team  in  the  stormy  night,  has  one  or  two  mildly 
interesting  adventures,  takes  a  little  too  much  at  the 
public-house,  is  dismissed  by  his  master,  &c.,  &c. 
Michael  is  an  industrious,  upright  peasant ;  his  only 
son,  who  has  always  been  dutiful,  goes  to  the  great 
town  and  becomes  bad;  and  his  father  thinks  of  him 
with  inexpressible  sadness  as  he  tries  in  vain  to  take 
interest  in  the  simple  industries  they  used  to  transact 
together.  The  poet  sees  the  leech-gatherer  at  his  work 
and  asks  him  to  tell  his  story ;  the  leech-gatherer 


xlvi  Poetry. 

complies,  but  the  poet  has  gone  off  in  melancholy 
musings  about  "mighty  poets  in  their  misery  dead," 
and  asks  the  leech-gatherer  to  go  over  it  all  again, 
which  the  good  soul  does ;  and  the  poet  then  tells  it 
to  the  reader ;  and  it  turns  out  to  be  no  great  story 
after  all,  though  illustrating  the  resolution  and  inde- 
pendence of  leech-gathering  peasants.  This,  I  say,  is 
Wordsworth's  manner,  and  it  is  not  the  manner  of 
great  imaginative  poets. 

These  poems,  however,  show  Wordsworth  at  his 
best,  or  nearly  at  his  best;  but  it  is  fair  that  we 
should  take  him  also,  if  in  one  sample  only,  at  his 
worst.  In  Ellen  Irwin,  or  the  Braes  of  Kirtle,  he  dis- 
plays a  degree  of  imaginative  torpor  distinctly  beyond 
that  which  appals  Mr.  Arnold  in  Vaudracour  and 
Julia.  He  had  a  fine  subject  to  deal  with,  and  the 
old  minstrel  who  treated  it  before  him  had  shown  him 
how  it  could  be  imaginatively  treated.  Love,  death, 
woman  sacrificing  herself  to  save  her  lover,  and  the 
fiery  vengeance  of  the  lover  overtaking  the  man  to 
whom  her  death  was  due — such  was  the  subject.  If 
that  does  not  awaken  imagination,  what  will?  It 
awakened  the  imagination  of  the  old  minstrel  so  effec- 
tually that  it  is  almost  impossible  not  to  feel  that 
he  must  himself  have  been  a  chief  actor  in  this  truly 
dramatic  lyric. 

O  that  I  were  where  Helen  lies, 

Night  and  day  on  me  she  cries, 

0  that  I  were  where  Helen  lies, 

On  fair  Kirkconnell  Lee  ! 


Ellen  Irwin.  xlvii 


Is  that  not  the  very  wail  of  love  in  agony  ?  And  then 
the  vengeance — 

I  hacked  him  in  pieces  sma'. 

You  see  that  he  could  have  torn  the  slayer  of  his 
love  with  his  teeth  like  a  tiger.  That  is  imaginative 
work. 

Read  now  the'  unparalleled  production  in  which 
Wordsworth,  as  I  have  no  doubt,  believed  himself  to 
have  improved  upon  the  rugged  work  of  the  old 
"  maker,"  and  shown  him  how  it  ought  to  have  been 
done.  With  exemplary,  gin-horse  industry,  he  begins, 
more  suo,  at  the  beginning,  and  plods  on  to  the  end, 
in  tiresome,  soporific  detail.  The  name  of  the  one 
lover  was  Bruce,  the  name  of  the  other  was  Gordon  ; 
the  one  did  this,  the  other  did  that,  &c.,  &c.  So  mor- 
tally unimaginative  is  the  work,  that  it  becomes  untrue 
even  as  a  transcript  of  possible  fact.  One  of  the 
lovers — I  forget  whether  it  was  Bruce  or  Gordon,  and 
don't  care — "  launched  a  deadly  javelin  "  at  the  breast 
of  the  other ;  whereupon 

Fair  Ellen  saw  it  when  it  oame, 
And  stepping  forth  to  meet  the  same, 
Did  with  her  body  cover 
The  youth,  her  chosen  lover. 

Consider  that.  The  writer  has  evidently  no  vision 
of  what  occurred,  and  writes  what,  even  in  prose, 
would  be  untrue.  Had  Ellen  "  stepped  forth  to  meet 
the  same,"  the  javelin  must  have  reached  its  goal  in 
her  lover's  heart  before  she  had  completed  her  arrange- 
ments. Even  a  schoolboy,  or  the  bellman,  would  have 


xlviii  Poetry, 

said  "  springing  upward  like  a  flame,"  or  something 
like  that.  Hear  Wordsworth  on  the  passion  of 
the  lovers. 

For  it  may  be  proclaimed  with  truth, 

If  Brace  hath  loved  sincerely, 

That  Gordon  loves  as  dearly." 

"  It  may  be  proclaimed  with  truth," — Wordsworth, 
his  mark  !  Such  phrases,  even  in  prose,  denote  spraw- 
ling, nerveless,  unimaginative  composition.  They  in- 
dicate in  Wordsworth  an  occasional  union  of  lethargic 
cerebration  with  perpetual  self-consciousness  not  ex- 
hibited, I  think,  by  any  other  poet  who  has  got  a 
place,  as  Wordsworth  has  after  all  rightfully  done, 
among  the  true  poets  of  the  world.  Mr.  Arnold 
speaks  of  the  "new  and  sacred  energy"  of  Words- 
worth's inspired  moments.  But  how  frequently  is 
this  sacred  energy  absent  exactly  at  the  moment  when 
it  is  wanted  !  That  single  word  "  machine,"  applied, 
in  the  very  climax  of  the  poem,  to  his  "perfect  woman 
nobly  planned,"  is  a  touch  of  the  dead  hand  that 
almost  makes  us  think  of  a  woman  at  Madame 
Tussaud's. 

So  much  for  Wordsworth's  habitual  method  of 
treating  his  subjects.  A  few  words  must  be  said  on 
the  nature  of  those  subjects.  His  practice  is  to  write 
poems  on  the  simplest  incidents  of  everyday  expe- 
rience. He  teases  his  little  boy  of  five  years  to  tell 
him  whether  he  likes  best  to  be  "  on  Kilve's  smooth 
shore  by  the  green  sea,  or  here  at  Liswyn  farm." 
The  child  says  carelessly  that  he  would  rather  be  at 


Wordsworth's  Commonplace.  xlix 

Kilve  than  where  he  is,  but  does  not  know  why. 
Five  times  does  the  father  press  the  boy  to  "  tell  him 
why."  At  last  the  little  fellow,  happening  to  glance 
up  at  the  vane  on  the  house-top,  and  hoping  to  silence 
the  old  fidget,  says  that  there  was  no  weathercock  at 
Kilve  and  that  was  "  the  reason  why."  On  this 
incident  we  have  fifteen  stanzas,  the  fifteenth  being  as 
follows : 

0  dearest,  dearest  Boy  !  my  heart 
For  better  lore  would  seldom  yearn, 

Could  I  but  teach  the  hundredth  part 
Of  what  from  thee  I  learn. 

I  suppose  a  true  Wordsworthian  would  find  no  end 
of  lessons  in  all  this ;  to  the  practical  mind  it  seems 
to  illustrate  no  truth  more  profound  than  that,  if  you 
tease  a  child  with  twaddle,  he  will  say  anything  that 
comes  uppermost  to  stay  the  infliction.  The  poet  sees 
old  Simon  Lee  at  work  on  the  root  of  an  old  tree,  and 
helps  him  to  get  over  a  difficulty.  The  man  thanks 
him.  The  incident  suggests  nearly  a  hundred  lines, 
the  whole  history  of  Simon  being  sketched,  and  the 
sorrow  of  bleak  age  shown  stealing,  as  is  usual  with 
melancholy  Wordsworth,  over  the  brightness  of  youth 
and  the  power  of  manhood.  It  is  an  eminently 
characteristic  and  quietly  beautiful  piece,  the  last  two 
of  its  double  stanzas  being  these  : 

"  You're  overtasked,  good  Simon  Lee, 

Give  me  your  tool,"  to  him  I  said  ; 
And  at  the  word  right  gladly  he 
Eeceived  my  proffered  aid. 


Poetry. 


I  struck,  and  with  a  single  blow 

The  tangled  root  I  severed, 
At  which  the  poor  old  man  so  long 

And  vainly  had  endeavoured. 

The  tears  into  his  eyes  were  brought, 

And  thanks  and  praises  seemed  to  run 
So  fast  out  of  his  heart,  I  thought 

They  never  would  have  done. 
— I've  heard  of  hearts  unkind,  kind  deeds 

With  coldness  still  returning  ; 
Alas  !  the  gratitude  of  men 

Hath  oftener  left  me  mourning. 

Such,  incidents  occur  to  every  one.  The  village 
pastor  could  fill  volumes  with  them.  Wordsworth 
dwells  longer  upon  them  than  other  people,  and  his 
persistent  practice  of  poetical  composition  and  undis- 
puted genius  enabled  him  to  detail  them  with  a  more 
felicitous  simplicity  than  commonplace  people  could 
attain ;  but  he  rarely  gives  them  a  diamond  point  of 
thought,  or  fuses  them  in  the  fire  of  his  imaginative 
glance.  His  reflections  are  those  which  occur  natur- 
ally to  every  humane  man.  It  can  hardly  be  doubted 
that  he  carried  too  far  the  principle  of  trusting  for  his 
subjects  to  the  trivialities  of  everyday  experience. 
The  routine  pacing  of  the  sunbeam  in  serene  weather 
along  the  dial-plate  will  not  ordinarily  yield  signs  and 
wonders,  either  of  religion  or  of  poetry. 

A  large  proportion  of  Wordsworth's  existence  was 
passed  in  what  may  be  described  as  a  state  of  refined 
spiritual  dreaminess,  bordering  on  lethargy.  A  friend 
rebukes  him  for  sitting  on  a  grey  stone  and  musing 
half  a  day.  He  writes  a  poem  by  way  of  answer,  and 


Wordsworth's  Half-truths.  li 

urges  that  "  we  can  feed  this  mind  of  ours  in  a  wise 
passiveness."  But  the  passive  mood  was  with  him 
too  frequent,  and  the  thoughts  that  loomed  on  him 
through  the  haze,  as  he  "  dreamed  his  time  away,"1 
were  apt  to  he  only  half  true. 

One  impulse  from  a  vernal  wood 

May  teach  you  more  of  man, 
Of  moral  evil  and  of  good, 

Than  all  the  sages  can. 

If  so,  the  sages  teach  precious  little.  He  made 
more  of  the  teaching  of  nature  than  was  fit ;  man 
learns  from  man. 

Books !  'tis  a  dull  and  endless  strife  ; 

Come,  hear  the  woodland  linnet, 
How  sweet  his  music  !  on  my  life 

There's  more  of  wisdom  in  it. 

No,  there  is  not.  Milton  had  a  very  different  notion 
of  books.  Wordsworth's  highest  excellence,  as  well 
as  his  deepest  defects,  have  connection  with  this 
passive  habit  of  mind.  In  his  musing  moods  he  occa- 
sionally strikes  chords  that  vibrate  to  no  hand  so  finely 
as  to  his. 

If  thou  be  one  whose  heart  the  holy  forms 

Of  young  imagination  have  kept  pure, 

Stranger  !  henceforth  be  warned  ;  and  know  that  pride, 

Howe'er  disguised  in  its  own  majesty, 

Is  littleness  ;  that  he  who  feels  contempt 

For  any  living  thing,  hath  faculties 

Which  he  has  never  used  ;  that  thought  with  him 

Is  in  its  infancy.     The  man  whose  eye 

Is  ever  on  himself  doth  look  on  one, 

The  least  of  Nature's  works,  one  who  might  move 

The  wise  man  to  that  scorn  which  Wisdom  holds 

Unlawful,  ever.     O  be  wiser,  thou  ! 

e 


Hi  Poetry. 

Instructed  that  true  knowledge  leads  to  love, 
True  dignity  abides  with  him  alone 
Who,  in  the  silent  hour  of  inward  thought, 
Can  still  suspect,  and  still  revere  himself, 
In  lowliness  of  heart. 

Even  in  these  noble  lines  there  is  a  trace  of  un- 
Teality.  It  is  not  true  that  we  ought  to  feel  con- 
tempt for  no  living  thing.  Wordsworth  himself  else- 
where expresses  a  just  and  manly  contempt  for  the 
sordid  worldling  who  had  given  away  his  heart.  The 
following  is  better, — shows  Wordsworth,  in  fact,  to 

my  thinking,  at  his  best : 

There  lives 
A  Judge        


In  whose  all-seeing  eye  a  noble  aim 

Faithfully  kept  is  as  a  noble  deed 

In  whose  pure  sight  all  virtue  doth  succeed. 

Nothing  in  religious  poetry  could  be  more  majestically 
noble  than  that.  I  do  not  remember  meeting  the 
same  thought  in  any  other  author.  It  is  one  of  those 
thoughts  which,  when  memorably  expressed,  form  the 
best  boon  a  poet  bestows  upon  his  race,  and  are  in 
very  truth  words  of  God  to  stay  the  soul  in  trouble. 
But  this,  as  I  said  before,  is  what  Mr.  Arnold  thinks 
the  weak  vein  in  the  poet ;  and  he  does  not  include 
the  sonnet  in  which  these  lines  occur  amongst  his 
selections.  I  entirely  agree  with  Mr.  Arnold  that 
Wordsworth  was  a  true  and  even  a  great  poet ;  funda- 
mentally healthy  and  wise ;  with  a  passion  for  nature 
that  made  him  a  force  among  his  countr}7men  :  but 
I  differ  with  him  sharply  when  he  lifts  Wordsworth 


Burns.  liii 


above  the  head  of  Hugo  and  of  Schiller,  and  of  all 
those  poets  that  appeared  in  Britain  between  the 
death  of  Milton  and  the  birth  of  Queen  Victoria. 
Of  two  of  these  last  I  shall  more  particularly,  though 
briefly,  speak  ;  and  first  of  Robert  Burns. 

No  man  presents  poetical  genius  or  inspiration  as  a 
glow  more  peremptorily  than  Burns.  Imagination  is 
his  natural  mood, — his  intellect  works  by  vision, — his 
soul  is  an  eye.  And  the  peculiar  poetic  mania  of 
seeing  all  things  alive  was  eminently  his.  This  is  the 
greatest  imaginative  gift,  and  distinguishes  the  maker ; 
but  the  gift  of  penetrating  sympathy,  whereby  the  poet 
gets  into  the  heart  of  everything  that  lives,  or  that  he 
dowers  with  life,  belonged  also  in  the  rarest  perfection 
to  Burns.  Compared  with  his,  the  poetical  genius  of 
Wordsworth  is  lax,  is  slow. 

Take  a  piece  which,  though  characteristic  of  Burns, 
is  unmistakably  one  of  his  minor  efforts, — The  Two, 
Dogs.  He  had  noticed  his  own  sheep-dog,  or  "  collie," 
gambolling  with  a  gentleman's  Newfoundland,  and  it 
occurred  to  him  that  a  conversation  between  the  two 
might  furnish  the  "  something  serious  "  which,  his  pub- 
lisher told  him,  would  be  a  desirable  feature  in  his  first 
volume.  He  sees  the  dogs  in  manner  as  they  lived, 
and  he  makes  us  see  them.  The  "locked,  letter'd 
braw  brass  collar  "  of  the  one,  the  glossy  black  coat, 
white  breast,  curling  tail,  and  honest  face  of  the  other, 
mark  them  out  in  all  the  distinctness  of  canine  rank 
and  canine  individuality.  Burns  gets  at  once  into 
their  hearts  and  enjoys  their  sport. 

e~  2 


liv  Poetry. 

Nae  doubt  but  they  were  fain  o'  ither, 
An'  unco  pack  an  thick  thegither  ; 
Wi'  social  nose  whyles  snuff'd  an'  snowkifc 
Whyles  mice  an'  moudieworts  *  they  howkit ; 
Whyles  scour'd  awa'  in  lang  excursion, 
And  worry'd  ither  in  diversion. 

That  is  as  vivid  as  painting,  and  painting  could  not 
give  the  movement  of  the  dogs.  Tired  at  length  of 
play,  they  sit  down  and  talk  of  mankind.  Their 
remarks  are  redolent  of  satire,  and  the  raciest  pith 
and  sense,  lit  up  here  and  there  by  vignette  pictures 
of  peasant  life,  not  to  be  surpassed  in  graphic  felicity 
and  genial  warmth.  But  observe  how  thoroughly 
he  enters  into  the  hearts  of  the  dogs ! — how  he  un- 
derstands the  sentiments  of  dog-land,  and  writes  like 
a  very  dog !  Consider  this,  on  a  functionary  whose 
character  must  be  a  subject  of  interest  in  every  kennel. 

Our  whipper-in,  wee,  blastit  wonner, 
Poor  worthless  elf,  it  eats  a  dinner, 
Better  than  ony  tenant  man. 

If  a  dog  could  speak,  would  he  not  say  just  that 
about  the  whipper-in?  The  collie,  for  his  part, 
describes  the  life  of  the  poor,  assuring  his  friend 
that,  though  hard,  it  has  its  alleviations.  There  are 
the  high-tides  of  Hallow-mass  and  New  Year's  Day, 
when  the  frost-winds  are  barred  out,  and  the  "  ingle  " 
burns  bright. 

The  cantie  auld  folks  crackin'  crouse, 
The  young  anes  rantin'  through  the  house, — 
My  heart  has  been  sae  fain  to  see  them, 
That  I  for  joy  hae  barkit  wi'  them. 

*  Moles. 


Burns' 's  Sympathy.  Iv 

The  Ettrick  Shepherd  said  that  he  had  seen  this 
description  verified  a  hundred  times  to  the  letter.  It 
is  true  to  the  kind  heart  of  Burns  that  he  should  have 
embraced  the  old  within  the  circle  of  household  joyful- 
ness.  Age  in  Wordsworth  is  despondent,  heavy-laden, 
apathetic ;  not  in  Burns.  And  the  loyal  dependent 
of  man  is  accepted  into  the  human  circle,  and 
heightens  the  merriment  by  his  genial  bark.  Very 
precious  in  its  moral  quality  is  the  regard  that  Burns 
has  for  the  lower  creatures.  Often  it  is  simply  the 
tenderness  that  shrinks  from  the  idea  of  their  pain, 
his  unaffected  dislike  of  the  huntsman's  art  evinc- 
ing extraordinary  fineness  and  gentleness  of  nature  in 
a  peasant.  But  often,  also,  it  is  a  feeling  of  mingled 
justice  and  mercy  with  reference  to  the  services  they 
render  man,  and  of  sympathetic  appreciation  of  their 
companionship.  His  New  Year  Morning  Salutation 
of  the  old  farmer  to  his  old  mare  has  a  poetry 
in  it  as  much  deeper  than  the  poetry  of  feudal  knight- 
hood, as  the  poetry  of  industry  and  home  is  deeper 
than  the  poetry  of  strife. 

Though  now  thou's  dowie,  stiff,  an'  crazy, , 
An'  thy  auld  hide's  as  white's  a  daisy, 
I've  seen  thee  dappl't,'  sleek,  and  glaizie, 
A  bonnie  grey. 

With  manly  pride  and  beautiful  tenderness,  he 
recalls  the  day  when  the  dappled  mare  bore  home  his 
bride,  and  recounts  her  triumphs  on  the  road  and  in  the 
furrow.  And  now,  when  they  both  are  old,  his  trusty 
servant  will  find  that  she  has  a  friend. 


Ivi  Poetry. 

We've  worn  to  crazy  years  thegither ; 
We'll  toyte  about  wi'  ane  anither ; 
Wi'  tentie  care  I'll  flit  thy  tether, 
To  some  hain'd  *  rig. 

Mr.  Arnold  fully  acknowledges  the  necessity,  to  the 
appreciation  of  Burns,  of  having  some  acquaintance 
with  Scotch ;  and  it  is  thoroughly  genial  in  him  to  say 
that  the  language  of  Burns  deserves  study  from  culti- 
vated Englishmen  as  the  language  of  Chaucer  deserves 
it :  such  a  phrase  as  "  we'll  toyte  about  wi'  ane 
anither  "  is  untranslatable — the  marvellous  onomato- 
poetic  accuracy  of  the  word  which  describes  the 
tottering  motion  of  an  old  man  and  an  old  horse 
belongs  to  the  original  inseparably.  "Tottering"  is 
too  hard — expresses  too  much  of  creaky  brokenness — 
the  "  toy  ting  "  has  something  in  it  of  the  pleasant 
feebleness  of  second  childhood  in  a  sunny  field.  And 
how  delicate  is  the  "  tentie  care  !  *" 

Of  The  Jolly  Beggars  Mr.  Arnold  speaks  in  terms  of 
admiration  that  may  well  satisfy  the  most  enthusiastic 
reader  of  Burns.  It  is  in  his  eyes  a  "puissant  and 
splendid  production,"  "  a  superb  poetic  success," 
displaying  "  a  breadth,  truth,  and  power  which  make 
the  famous  scene  in  Auerbach's  Cellar,  of  Goethe's 
Faust,  seem  artificial  and  tame  beside  it,  and  which 
are  only  matched  by  Shakespeare  and  Aristophanes." 
For  badness  and  for  goodness  the  piece  is  entirely  true 
to  Burns — here  he  stands,  the  whole  man,  as  we  have 
Wordsworth  in  Peter  Bell  and  Michael.  The  coarse- 

*  Saved ;  kept  in  reserve. 


The  Jolly  Beggars.  Ivii 


ness  which  mars  Burns,  the  coarseness  which  was  a. 
broadly-marked,  undeniable  characteristic  of  the 
Scotland  mirrored  in  his  poetry,  is  here  at  its  worst. 
It  is  not  so  bad  as  the  coarseness  of  Chaucer ;  it  is 
never  dwelt  on,  as  the  subject  and  interest  of  the 
description,  as  in  tales  which  could  be  mentioned  of 
Chaucer's;  it  is  put  in,  with  flying,  forceful  touch, 
because  it  is  there,  a  part  of  the  visioned  fact  into 
which  the  eye  of  the  poet  is  glaring,  necessary  if  we 
must  have  utter  veracity,  however  alien  to  ideal 
beauty :  but  it  is  lamentable,  nevertheless. 

If  the  stains  on  Burns's  genius,  however,  are  con- 
spicuous in  this  poem,  they  do  not  quench  its  general 
blaze  of  power  and  brilliance.  It  displays  in  its  ut- 
most intensity  and  comprehensiveness  that  sympathy 
with  mankind,  which  was  his  master-passion,  and 
that  creative  gift  of  imagination  by  which  he  gave 
form  and  life.  The  gambolling  of  dogs  and  the 
fortunes  of  old  mares  interested  him,  but  the  merry- 
makings of  his  fellow-men  had  for  him  an  irresistible 
and  supreme  fascination.  Accordingly  he  dived,  one 
night,  with  a  brace  of  trusty  companions,  into  a 
public-house  in  Mauchline  of  the  lowest  description, 
the  resort  of  strolling  tinkers,  fiddlers,  and  other  vag- 
rants. What  he  witnessed  forms  the  subject-matter 
of  this  poem ;  and  he  has  made  out  of  it  perhaps 
the  most  exultant  demonstration  of  the  strength  of 
life,  and  of  the  power  of  laughter  to  rise  victorious 
over  hardship  and  penury,  to  be  found  in  any  litera- 
ture. Not  one  circumstance  of  the  squalor  and 


Iviii  Poetry. 

looped  and  windowed  raggedness  of  these  waifs  and 
•strays  of  human  kind  is  disguised,  and  yet  they  are 
uproariously  happy.  There  is  no  didacticism  in  the 
poem,  yet  it  is  a  deep  chapter  in  the  philosophy  of  life. 
It  shows  nature's  reserve  power — her  capacity,  when 
•she  seems  driven  to  extremity,  to  make  life  still 
tolerable. 

We  should  note,  as  significant  in  many  ways,  that 
the  poor  vagrants  have  not  a  word  to  say  against  their 
social  superiors.  Of  the  democratic  exasperation  and 
teeth-gnashing,  of  which  we  have  had  so  much  since 
the  French  Kevolution,  there  is  not  a  forecast.  Nor, 
though  we  have  throughout  a  humourous  contempt  for 
the  respectabilities,  is  there  any  suggestion  of  sym- 
pathy with  mean  thieving  or  swindling.  "  Braw  John 
Highlandman,"  though  he  holds  the  Lowland  laws  in 
scorn,  "  is  faithful  to  his  clan."  The  tinker  is  proud 
of  his  trade,  the  fiddler  pays  for  his  cheer  "  at  kirns 
and  weddings  "  with  music.  The  battered  old  soldier, 
minus  an  arm  and  a  leg,  is  a  hero  every  inch,  one  with 
whom  Homer  would  have  hobnobbed.  He  tells  you 
where  he  got  his  wounds, — one,  for  example,  "in  a 
trench,  when  welcoming  the  French."  That  epithet 
"  welcoming "  is  perfection.  All  the  nobleness  of 
chivalry  is  in  it, — the  frank  valour  of  the  soldier  who 
bears  no  grudge  against  a  noble  foe, — and  the  reckless 
joy  of  battle.  Then,  with  what  brilliant  lyrical 
touches — lyrical  in  their  brevity  and  brightness,  epic 
in  their  decisive  selection  of  the  right  points — does  old 
Wooden-leg  glance  along  the  wars  of  Great  Britain  in 


Old   Wooden-leg.  lix 


liis  time  !  The  song  is  worthy  of  any  war-poet  from 
Tyrtasus  to  Beranger,  and  yet  it  is  not  in  the  least  out 
of  keeping  with  the  character  of  the  begging  soldier. 

My  'prenticeship  I  past  where  my  leader  breath'd  his  last, 
When  the  bloody  die  was  cast  on  the  heights  of  Abram  ; 

I  serv'd  out  my  trade  when  the  gallant  game  was  play'd 
And  the  Moro  low  was  laid  at  the  sound  of  the  drum. 

I  lastly  was  with  Curtis,  among  the  floating  batteries, 
And  there  I  left  for  witness  an  arm  and  a  limb ; 

Yet  let  my  country  need  me,  with  Elliot  to  head  me, 
I'd  clatter  on  my  stumps  at  the  sound  of  a  drum. 

That  belongs  to  the  perennial  in  poetry.  Out  of 
the  dingy  atmosphere  of  a  tavern  revel  the  old  soldier 
rises  into  the  changeless  blue  of  universal  human 
sympathy. 

Mr.  Arnold  is  severe  upon  Scottish  life.  "  Burns's 
world  of  Scotch  drink,  Scotch  religion,  and  Scotch 
manners,  is  often  a  harsh,  a  sordid,  a  repulsive  world." 
Not  "  sordid,"  Mr.  Arnold — peremptorily  not  sordid. 
A  world  of  hard  labour,  of  stern  thrift,  not  of  sordid- 
ness  ;  the  old  farmer  has  had  a  hard  life  of  it,  but  he 
can  spare  a  "  hain'd  rig  "  for  his  old  mare  yet,  though 
she  will  never  do  him  another  stroke  of  work.  A  rude 
coarse  world  in  many  of  its  aspects,  but  without  any 
of  those  pestilential  taints  that  kill  or  paralyse  the 
soul ;  a  world  in  which  the  peasant  can  respect  his 
pastor,  though  he  never  fancies  him  a  priest  or  hesi- 
tates to  hold  his  own  against  him  in  argument ;  in 
which  the  farmer's  cottage  is  his  castle ;  in  which  there 
is  severe,  but  not  stunting  or  depressing  labour,  hard 


lx  Poetry. 

fare,  but  not  the  pinch  of  hunger;  and  the  heath-clad 
or  grass-clad  breast  of  mother  earth  to  rest  on,  the 
flashing  sea  to  look  at,  the  unpolluted  air  to  breathe, 
the  wheeling  plover-flight  to  watch  in  the  sky  and  the 
birch  and  hawthorn,  to  make  love  under,  by  the  river 
side.  Certain  it  is  that  Scottish  national  feeling  did 
not  bar  the  old  soldier  of  Burns  from  taking  the  world- 
historical  and  British  view  of  events.  Every  conflict 
he  celebrates  is  English.  I  take  leave  to  add  that  the 
imperial  patriotism  of  Burns,  Campbell,  Scott,  might 
rebuke  that  provincial  patriotism  which  makes  it  so 
difficult  to  find  in  a  poem  by  an  English  writer  one 
word  of  cordial  reference  either  to  Ireland  or  to  Scot- 
land. Tennyson  has  an  open  heart  for  all  English 
interests  and  parties,  but  at  these,  with  freezing  pre- 
cision, he  draws  the  line.  In  celebrating  the  deliver- 
ance by  the  Highlanders  of  the  besieged  remnant  in 
Lucknow  Eesidency,  he  makes  his  verse  meaningless 
by  speaking  of  the  "pibroch  of  Europe,"  rather  than 
name  the  land  of  Carlyle,  Scott,  and  Burns. 

Nor  is  it  too  daring  to  hold  that  Burns's  love  for 
Scotland  did  not  pervert  but  ennoble  his  patriotism  in 
general.  It  is  because  he  wrote  Bruce' s  Address  to  his 
Soldiers  before  the  Battle  of  Bannockbwrn  that  he 
could  sing  with  right  enthusiasm  of  the  Heights  of 
Abram  and  the  Storm  of  the  Moro,  of  Wolfe  at 
Quebec  and  Elliot  at  Gibraltar.  Mr.  Arnold  would 
have  had  a  still  deeper  and  truer  appreciation  of  Burns, 
if  he  had  been  as  able  as  Carlyle  to  understand  and 
sympathise  with  his  Scottish  feeling.  No  one  under- 


Burns 's  Pride.  Ixi 


standing  the  part  played  by  religion  in  the  history  of 
Scotland  could  think  that  Burns,  for  all  his  wild  words 
of  satire  and  his  fiery  scorn  for  hypocrisy,  was  an  ironical 
free-thinker  of  the  knowing  modern  type — "  whistle 
o'er  the  lave  o't " — as  Mr.  Arnold  suggests  :  nor,  if  he 
had  known  what  a  thing  is  Scotch  pride,  in  struggle 
with  the  res  angusta  domi,  could  he  have  imagined 
that  it  was  from  the  outworks,  and  not  from  the 
central  fastness  and  heart's  heart  of  Burns,  that  A 
man's  a  man  for  a1  that  proceeded.  In  his  boyhood, 
under  his  father's  roof,  Burns  had  known  the  struggle 
with  straitened  circumstances,  and  with  all  the  strength 
of  his  soul  had  longed  for  the  freedom  and  enlarge- 
ment of  an  "  honest  independence."  Throughout  his  life 
he  had  yearned  for  this,  striven  for  it,  keeping  only  apart 
from  it,  as  holier  than  it,  the  sacred  and  thrilling  joy 
of  his  poetry.  And  now,  at  thirty-six,  when  he  knows 
that  in  the  battle  of  life  he  has  been  what  the  world 
calls  beaten — that  he  has  lived  and  will  die  a  poor 
man — he  stands  forth  and  sings  this  solemn  psalm,  in- 
stinct with  the  imperishable  life  of  universal  truth. 

Is  there,  for  honest  poverty, 

That  hangs  his  head  and  a'  that, 
The  coward  slave  we  pass  him  by, 

We  dare  be  poor  for  a'  that. 
For  a'  that,  and  a'  that, 

Our  toils  obscure  and  a'  that ; 
The  rank  is  but  the  guinea's  stamp, 

The  man's  the  gowd  for  a'  that. 

But  in  Burns,  no  more  than  in  his  old  soldier,  is 
there  any  of  the  sava  indignatio  that  tore  the  heart 
of  Swift — any  furious  grudge  against  society — any  pes~ 
simistic  bitterness  or  despair  of  mankind. 


Ixii  Poetry. 

Then  let  us  pray  that  come  it  may — 

As  come  it  will  for  a'  that — 
That  sense  and  worth,  o'er  a'  the  earth, 

May  bear  the  gree  and  a'  that ; 
For  a'  that,  and  a'  that, 

It's  comin'  yet  for  a'  that, 
That  man  to  man,  the  warld  o'er, 

Shall  brithers  be  for  a'  that. 

It  was  like  Burns  to  speak  slightingly  of  this  mighty 
lyric  when  sending  it  to  the  unsouled  clay  of  George 
Thomson.  "  It  was  little,"  says  Lockbart,  "  in 
Burns's  character  to  let  his  feelings  on  certain  subjects 
escape." 

In  no  respect  do  the  poems  of  Wordsworth  more 
strongly  contrast  with  those  of  Burns  than  in  what  I 
would  call,  with  strict  meaning,  historical  value.  The 
first  book  of  Homer's  Iliad  makes  the  life  of  old  heroic 
Greece  visible  to  us.  We  see  it  and  know  it  in  a  sense 
in  which  no  mere  statistical  information  could  place  it 
before  us.  In  this  sense  Burns  is  the  Scottish  historian 
of  his  day  and  generation.  His  Tarn  o'Shanter,  his 
Duncan  Gray,  his  Doctor  Hornbook,  his  lads  and 
lasses  frolicking  at  Halloween,  his  peasant  opening  the 
Bible  and  reverently  reading  it  to  his  household  in  the 
evening,  are  as  true  to  the  Ayrshire  of  his  time  as  the 
weeping  Achilles  and  his  divine  mother,  the  mourning 
Priam  and  his  dead  Hector,  are  to  that  old  Homeric 
world ;  and  the  same  ring  and  shout  of  human  laughter 
makes  ancient  and  modern  kin,  when  the  preternatural 
portent  of  Halloween  turns  out  to  be  "  grumphy,  asteer 
that  night,"  and  when  Ajax,  clearing  from  mouth  and 
nostril  the  mud  into  which  he  had  flopped,  complains 
that  he  had  been  tripped  up  in  the  race  by  Pallas,  and 


The  Daisy.  Ixiil 


the  surrounding  Achaians  "  laugh  sweetly "  at  the 
notion.  Now  Wordsworth's  poems,  as  compared  with 
those  of  Keats  and  Shelley,  are  racy  of  the  soil.  There 
is  a  good  deal  of  Cumberland  in  them.  But,  compared 
with  those  of  Burns,  they  are  outside  Cumberland  life. 
They  render  its  misty  melancholy,  but  of  its  mirth 
they  give  hardly  the  faintest  echo.  Only  once — in  The 
Waggoner — do  we  hear  much  of  dancing.  The  humour 
of  the  people,  the  movement  of  their  life,  their  sports, 
their  passionate  loving,  all  which  we  must  suppose 
them  to  have  had,  are  absent.  There  is  in  fact  nothing 
in  English  poetry  that  will  take  rank  with  the  vital 
and  vivid  presentation  of  Scottish  life  and  manners  in 
the  poems  of  Burns.  The  world  has  enjoyed  it,  not 
because  it  is  Scotch,  but  because  it  is  human. 

Such  pieces  as  the  address  to  the  Daisy  and  the 
address  to  the  Mouse  are  too  familiar  to  require  more 
than  mention.  Their  tenderness,  their  pathos,  their 
aptness  of  allusion  to  human  destinies,  are  universally 
felt.  In  the  Daisy  there  are  some  lines  so  delicately 
fanciful  that  they  form  an  enchanting  variation  on  the 
strong  vehemence  of  the  poet's  general  mood.  His 
plough  had  gone  harshly  over  the  "  crimson- tipped 
flower."  Burns  touches  on  the  circumstance. 

Alas  !  it's  no  thy  neebor  sweet, 
The  bonnie  lark,  companion  meet, 
Bending  thee  'mang  the  dewy  weet, 

Wi'  speckled  breast, 
When  upward-springing,  blithe,  to  greet 

The  purpling  East. 

If  Burns  had  never  written  another  verse  but  that, 


Ixiv  Poetry. 

we  should  have  known  that  he  had  a  poetic  nature. 
There  is  something  feminine  in  it, — so  there  is  in  all 
gently  fanciful  poetry  :  doubtless  the  melody  and  magic 
of  poetry  have  something  to  do  with  the  blending 
together  of  the  finest  elements  distinctive  of  man  and 
the  finest  elements  distinctive  of  woman, — breeze  and 
stream  co-operating  in  the  modulated  ripple.  Between 
Milton  and  Burns  you  will  not  meet  with  a  stanza  like 
this.  To  Dryden,  to  Pope,  to  Cowper  even,  it  would 
have  seemed  silly.  It  is  hardly  imaginative,  but  it  is 
fancy's  finest  gold. 

More  imaginative,  more  earnest,  is  the  address  to 
the  Mouse.  The  daisy's  fate  does  not  really  stir  the 
depths  of  any  man's  heart.  Its  woes  are  of  the  fancy. 
But  a  mouse  feels  as  well  as  a  man,  and  no  one  knew 
that  better  than  Burns.  He  looks  down  with  intensest 
sympathy  on  the  sleek,  soft,  glittering-eyed  little 
wonder,  whose  "  wee  bit  housie  "  he  has  laid  in  ruins. 
"Oh,  what  a  panic's  in  thy  breastie !  "  The  strong 
man's  heart  beats  in  the  tiny,  panting  breast. 

I  can  conceive  nothing  more  finely  perfect  than  the 
lines  to  the  mouse ;  but  if  I  were  asked  which  of  his 
poems  conveys  to  me  the  most  forcible  impression  of 
his  power,  not  in  its  tenderness,  but  in  its  strength,  I 
should  name  the  lines  to  an  unmentionable  phenomenon 
— a  creeping  thing  detested  by  saint  and  sinner — seen 
on  a  lady's  bonnet  in  church.  If  you  want  to  have 
Burns  in  the  very  tempest  of  his  strength — in  his  ve- 
hemence, his  fervent  heat — the  Thor  knuckles  white  as 
his  hammer  smites  the  rock — read  this  unique  and  tre- 


Burns  at  His  Strongest.  Ixv 

mendous  poem.     We  have  seen  that  he  could  get  into 
the  hearts  of  dogs  and  mice  ;  but  now  he  goes  lower  in 
creation,  and,  in  all  the  rapture  of  poetic  vision,  enters 
the   soul   of  this  crawling   beast.     As    a  moralist,  as 
a   satirist,   as   a  humourist,   Burns   here   culminates. 
There   is   the   grandest   world-irony   in   the  lines, — a 
laugh  deep,  sardonic,  shaking  the  man's  whole  frame. 
If  Bottom  and  Dogberry  and  Malvolio  had  presented 
themselves  in  one  incomparable  moment  to  the  mind 
of  Shakespeare,  he  would  have  felt  as  Burns  felt  while 
watching    the  entomological  specimen  on   the  ladvr's 
bonnet.     The  impudence  that  protects  the  complacent 
creature,  as  it  "  strunts  rarely  o'er  gauze  and  lace  " — 
the  semi-starvation  that  is  the  lightly  borne  penalty 
of  beggarly  pride,  "  dining  sparely  "  in  its  exalted  sta- 
tion— these  come  out  in  the  first  stanza.     Then,  with 
that  inquisitiveness  of  prying  imagination  which  led 
him  into  Poosy  Nancy's  tavern  when  the  revel  was  in 
full  scream,  the  poet  dives  into  the  Tartarean  deeps 
of  entomological  existence.      Returning  to  the  upper 
air,   he  once  more  concentrates  his  attention  on  the 
devious,  yet  mounting,  course  of  the  specimen  in  view. 
For  a  moment  it  disappears  under  the  ribbons. 

Now  haud  you  there,  ye're  out  o'  sight, 
Below  the  fatt'rils  snug  and  tight ! 

Not  likely !     The  aspiring  creature,  proudly  re-emer- 
gent, mounts  and  mounts,  until  it  beams  forth  on 

The  very  tapmost,  tow'ring  height 

O'  Miss's  bonnet. 

Two  verses  of  admirably  arch  and  pungent  humour 


Ixvi  Poetry. 

follow,  and  then,  in  two  more,  about  "  winks  and 
finger-ends"  that  are  taking  notice,  and  the  beneficent 
gift  of  seeing  ourselves  as  others  see  us,  this  master- 
piece ends. 

O  Jenny,  dinna  toss  your  head, 

Or  set  your  beauties  all  abread ; 

Ye  little  ken  what  cursed  speed 
The  blastie's  makin*. 

Thae  winks  and  finger-ends,  I  dread, 
Are  notice  takin'. 

0  wad  some  Power  the  giftie  gie  us 

To  see  oursels  as  ithers  see  us  ! 

It  wad  frae  mony  a  blunder  free  us, 

An'  foolish  notion  ; 
What  airs  in  dress  and  gait  wad  lae'  us, 

And  e'en  devotion ! 

Consider  the  range  of  poetic  faculty  between  the 
rugged  strength  of  these  verses  and  the  delicate  beauty 
and  tenderness  of  the  following  : 

The  hoary  cliffs  are  crown'd  wi'  flowers, 
White  o'er  the  linns  the  burnie  pours, 
And  rising  weets  wi'  misty  showers 
The  birks  of  Aberfeldy ; 

Let  fortune's  gifts  at  random  flee, 
They  ne'er  shall  draw  a  wish  frae  me, 
Supremely  blest  wi'  love  an'  thee, 
In  the  birks  of  Aberfeldy. 

Lyrical  poetry  is  the  essential  poetry,  the  poetry  of 
life  in  its  highest  moments,  the  poetry  of  spring  and  of 
passion.  Its  distinctive  note  is  love ;  and  it  will  not 
be  disputed  that  in  the  songs  and  lyrical  ballads  of 
Burns  is  to  be  found  as  noble  an  expression  of  love 
as  exists  in  language.  His  love-lyrics  have  the 


Burns's  Love-songs.  Ixvii 

play  and  colour  of  the  fountain  and  the  heat  of  the 
furnace.  Mr.  Arnold  signalises  the  nice  perfection  of 
Tarn  Glen;  but  surely  it  is  only  the  light  touch  and 
sportive  mood  of  Burns  that  we  have  in  Tarn  Glen. 
For  anything  to  equal  the  best  love-songs  of  Burns,  we 
must  step  beyond  the  English  language,  and  listen  to 
Clarchen's  song  in  Egmont,  or  Amalia's  in  The  Robbers. 
The  genius  of  English,  stately,  proud,  and  cold,  is  not 
so  favourable  to  lyric  poetry  as  the  German  of  Goethe 
and  Schiller,  or  the  Scotch  of  Burns.  If  Burns  is 
one  of  the  greatest  love-poets  of  the  world,  Words- 
worth can  hardly  be  called  a  love-poet  at  all.  Of 
youth-and-maiden  rapture  there  is,  in  his  poems, 
almost  no  sympathetic  expression. 

We  have,  indeed,  the  stateliness  of  his  verse  to  make 
some  amends.  I  would  grant  that,  in  style,  he  has  the 
advantage  of  Burns.  Style  is  a  high  quality,  and,  if 
other  things  are  equal,  the  poet  whose  work  has  most 
style  is  the  better  poet.  But  style  is,  perhaps,  irrecon- 
cilable with  the  wild  and  witching  sweetness  of  the 
Doric  lyre.  Style  seems  also  to  involve  some  element 
which,  if  not  irreconcilable  with  superlative  genius,  is 
yet  not  quite  congenial  to  it.  The  greatest  poets  of  all, 
though  they  can  occasionally  be  stylists,  are  by  pre- 
ference and  on  the  whole  humourists.  Dante,  Milton, 
Schiller,  are  stylists,  not  humourists ;  Homer,  Shake- 
speare, Goethe,  are  humourists  rather  than  stylists. 
We  praise  the  stylists,  and  ought  to  read  them.  We 
cannot  help  reading  the  humourists. 

It  seems  almost  a  shame,  however,  to  pit  Words- 


Ixviii  Poetry. 

worth  against  a  poet  whom  he  so  deeply  valued,  so 
generously  recognised.  He  is  always  at  his  best  in 
writing  about  Burns,  and  never  has  the  greatness  of 
Burns  been  more  correctly  defined  than  in  the  follow- 
ing monumental  stanza  : 

Through  busiest  street  and  loneliest  glen 

Are  felt  the  flashes  of  his  pen ; 

He  rules  'mid  winter's  snows,  and  when 

Bees  fill  their  hives ; 
Deep  in  the  general  heart  of  men 

His  power  survives. 

No  poet  is  more  expressly  the  poet  of  a  class — a 
refined,  a  superior  class,  if  you  will,  but  a  strictly 
limited  one — a  class  confined  hitherto,  Mr.  Arnold 
tells  us,  to  England — than  Wordsworth.  No  poet  in 
all  the  starry  throng  has  struck  more  decisively  those 
perennial  chords  in  the  human  heart  to  which  all 
hearts  vibrate  than  Burns. 

And  Byron  ? — Can  we,  unless  blinded  by  early 
associations  or  by  that  insular  prejudice  which  was 
personified  and  has  been  canonised  in  Dr.  Johnson, 
maintain  against  Europe  that  the  author  of  Childe 
Harold  and  Don  Juan  was  an  inferior  poet  to  the 
author  of  The  Excursion  ?  I  am  prepared  to  en- 
dorse a  very  dark  indictment  against  Byron,  both 
as  a  man  and  as  a  poet.  If  we  exempt  the  vices 
of  cruelty  and  dishonesty,  I  see  not  what  could 
have  been  more  immoral  than  his  life ;  and  I  cannot, 
after  most  carefully  considering  the  point,  doubt  that, 
as  an  artist,  he,  who  had  been  gifted  by  nature  so 
bounteously,  who  was  in  possession  of  so  many  of 


Byron.  Ixix 

the  true  spells  of  poetic  art,  deliberately  stained  and 
defiled  his  work  in  order  that  it  might  be  bought, 
anointing  it  with  honey  of  hell  in  order  that  the  base 
sweetness  might  attract  the  flies  of  Beelzebub.  I 
admit  also  that,  apart  from  the  artistically  illegitimate 
attractions  of  licentiousness  in  his  poems,  we  find  in 
them  occasionally  an  utter  prosiness  which  it  is  hard 
to  explain.  Byron's  dead  bits  are  palpably,  offensively 
dead,  and  they  are  apt  to  occur  in  his  fine  work.  The 
"  there  let  him  lay,"  at  the  end  of  one  of  the  stanzas 
of  the  address  to  the  ocean  at  the  end  of  Childe 
Harold,  is  unsurpassable  both  in  vulgarity  and  in 

feebleness. 

A  king  sat  on  the  rocky  brow 

That  looks  o'er  sea-born  Salamis  ; 
And  ships,  by  thousands,  lay  below, 

And  men  in  nations  ; — all  were  his ! 
He  counted  them  at  break  of  day — 
And  when  the  sun  set  where  were  they  ? 

That  is,  to  my  thinking,  as  noble  poetry,  of  the 
lyrical-descriptive  kind,  as  can  be  conceived.  The 
words  that  succeed — 

And  where  are  they  ? 

are  sheer  fatuity.  The  first  question  calls  up  a  crowd 
of  ideas,  all  sublime ;  the  second  clashes  with  the  first, 
or  blends  with  it,  and  both  become  nonsense.  Once 
more,  I  do  not  make  much  of  the  philosophy  or  the 
politics  of  Byron.  The  profundities  and  audacities  of 
speculation  in  Cam  are  in  fact  the  commonplaces,  the 
mere  chips  and  sweepings,  of  the  schools  of  theological 
and  philosophical  controversy.  All  that  vapouring 

/-a 


Ixx  Poetry. 

against  kings  and  priests — that  swaggering  defiance 
of  the  conventional  ordinances  of  society — depended 
on  mere  ignorance  as  to  the  part  really  played  by 
Idngs  and  priests  in  human  history,  and  was  put  to 
flight  by  the  first  dawning  rays  of  Carlyle's  genial 
sagacity  and  historical  instinct. 

Enough ;  I  am  tempted  by  no  enthusiasm  to  over- 
rate the  power  of  Byron ;  but  it  seems  to  me  almost 
incredible  that   Mr.   Arnold   should   set   Wordsworth 
above  him.    Goethe,  at  the  time  when  Byron  attained 
his  reputation,  was  greater  as  a  critic  than  as  a  poet, 
and  he  deliberately  pronounced  Byron's  genius  incom- 
mensurable.    Scott  accounted  for  his   own  abandon- 
ment of  poetry  in  three  words,   "Byron  beat  me." 
Por   Shelley  Byron  was   "the  Pythian  of  his  age," 
and  Wilson,  who  himself  had  seemed  at  one  moment 
to  be  no  unlikely  candidate  for  the  poetical  crown,  was 
satisfied  with  the  honour  of  strewing  flowers  in  Byron's 
path.  We  mark  the  noble  poet,  expelled  from  England , 
lighting  up  Europe  with  the  splendour  of  his  genius, 
which  runs  like  liquid  fire  along  the  course  of  the  Rhine, 
and  glitters  among  the  Alpine  summits.  He  had  an  eye 
that  could  pierce  to  nature's  most  exquisite  loveliness, 
hut  it  was  seldom  his  mood  to  watch  the  glancing  of 
the  silver  streamlet,  like  "  the  shy  chamois'  eye,"  or  to 
mark  the  delicate  fluttering  of  daffodils.     He  loved  to 
look  on  nature  in  her  moments  of  sublimity  and  of 
terror,  and  at  such  moments  he  flung  the  life  of  his 
creative  imagination  into   the   glory  and  the   gloom. 
He  is  the  fellow   of    the  mountains   in  their  Titan 


Byron's  Imagination.  Ixxi 

mirth,    and    laughs    with    them    amid    the     rattling 
thunderbolts  and  the  hissing  rain. 

The  sky  is  changed  ! — and  such  a  change  1  Oh  night, 
And  storm,  and  darkness,  ye  are  wondrous  strong, 

Yet  lovely  in  your  strength,  as  is  the  light 
Of  a  dark  eye  in  woman !     Far  along, 

From  peak  to  peak,  the  rattling  crags  among, 

Leaps  the  live  thunder !     Not  from  one  lone  cloud, 

But  every  mountain  now  hath  found  a  tongue, 
And  Jura  answers,  through  her  misty  shroud, 
Back  to  the  joyous  Alps,  who  call  to  her  aloud. 

*  *  *  *  * 

And  this  is  in  the  night : — most  glorious  night ! 

Thou  wert  not  made  for  slumber !  let  me  be 
A  sharer  in  thy  fierce  and  far  delight, — 

A  portion  of  the  tempest  and  of  thee  ! 
How  the  lit  lake  shines,  a  phosphoric  sea, 

And  the  big  rain  comes  dancing  to  the  earth  I 
And  now  again  'tis  black, — and  now,  the  glee 

Of  the  loud  hills  shakes  with  its  mountain -mirth, 

As  if  they  did  rejoice  o'er  a  young  earthquake's  birth. 

Has  Wordsworth  written  anything  like  that  ?  Can 
we  wonder  that  Europe  thrilled  to  touches  like  these, 
while  it  remained  indifferent  to  poetical  admonitions 
addressed  to  robins  for  killing  butterflies  ?  Here  is  a 
personification  of  battle — a  vision  of  the  thing  alive — 
executed  while  we  can  still  trace  the  'prentice  hand  in 
Byron's  manner. 

Death  rides  upon  the  sulphury  Siroc, 

Bed  Battle  stamps  his  foot,  and  nations  feel  the  shock. 

*  *  *  *  * 

Lo  1  where  the  Giant  on  the  mountain  stands, 
His  blood-red  tresses  deep'ning  in  the  sun, 

With  death-shot  glowing  in  his  fiery  hands, 
And  eye  that  scorcheth  all  it  glares  upon ; 


Ixxii  Poetry. 

Restless  it  rolls,  now  fixed,  and  now  anon 

Flashing  afar, — and  at  his  iron  feet 
Destruction  cowers,  to  mark  what  deeds  are  done. 

Why  should  I  refer  to  a  host  of  such  passages  as 
that  on  the  eve  of  Waterloo,  that  on  the  dying 
gladiator,  or  to  what,  though  faulty  here  and  there, 
is  a  magnificent  poem,  The  Isles  of  Greece  ?  A  genera- 
tion or  two  ago,  these  were  recognised,  and  when  the 
present  reaction  from  the  past  over-praise  of  Byron 
shall  have  spent  its  force,  they  will  again  be  recog- 
nised as  supreme  as  magnificent. 

But  critics  have  not  given  due  consideration  to  that 
part  of  Byron's  performance  in  which  he  had  begun  to 
divest  himself  of  his  affectations,  to  fling  aside  the  stage 
dress  of  misanthropy  and  self-condolence  which  had 
so  impressed  the  shilling  gallery,  and  to  let  his  native 
shrewdness  and  genuine  sympathy  have  full  play. 
Those  cantos  of  Don  Juan  which  lead  up  to  and  de- 
scribe the  siege  of  Ismail  show  Byron  at  his  best ;  and 
their  quality  is  high  indeed.  In  no  poetry  in  the 
world — not  in  Shakespeare's  or  Homer's — do  we  feel 
ourselves  more  decisively  to  be  among  living  men, 
among  great  human  interests,  and  in  the  hand  of  a 
poet  who  understands  both  the  one  and  the  other. 
The  portrait  of  Suwarrow  is  unrivalled  in  recent 
English  verse.  In  the  best  characters  in  his  novels, 
Scott  is  as  graphic  and  as  true ;  but  Scott  never  suffi- 
ciently emancipated  himself  from  the  sense  of  what  was 
due  to  style  and  stateliness  in  poetry  to  dare  to  put  such 
work  into  his  Marmion,  his  Fitzjames,  his  Bruce,  as 


Byron's  Suwarrow.  Ixxiii 

Byron  puts  into  his  Suwarrow.  Byron's  humour  here 
stands  him  in  good  stead, — no  touch  indeed  save  that 
of  a  humourist  could  have  realised  such  a  personality  as 
Suwarrow's ;  and  yet  the  grotesque  does  not  in  the 
least — when  the  delineation  of  the  leader  is  viewed  in 
connection  with  the  description  of  the  siege  as  a  whole — 
compromise  the  sublime.  But  Byron  apprehends  more 
than  the  personality  of  Suwarrow.  He  apprehends, 
with  a  practical  discernment  as  shrewd  as  that  of 
Frederick  of  Prussia,  the  principles  on  which  Suwarrow 
conducts  the  whole  business,  the  inexorable  necessity 
of  putting  the  first  before  the  second — the  dreary  de- 
tails of  drill  before  the  pomp  and  circumstance  of 
battle — and  the  electrical  effect  of  an  original  mind  in 
breathing  new  energy  into  masses  of  men.  It  is  not 
too  much  to  say  that,  in  the  cantos  to  which  I  now 
refer,  the  principle  may  be  found  of  all  those  books  in 
which  Mr.  Carlyle,  with  so  vast  an  influence  upon 
historical  literature,  has  illustrated  "the  sway  of  your 
great  men  o'er  little." 

There  was  not  now  a  luggage-boy  but  sought 
Danger  and  spoil  with  ardour  much  increased, 
And  why  ?  because  a  little,  odd,  old  man, 
Stript  to  his  shirt,  was  come  to  lead  the  van. 

Suwarrow  did  not  call  upon  the  army  to  rush  at  once 
to  the  charge;  he  bethought  him  of  something  else 

first. 

It  is  an  actual  fact,  that  he,  Commander- 
in-chief,  in  proper  person  deign'd  to  drill 
The  awkward  squad,  and  could  afford  to  squander 
His  time,  a  corporal's  duty  to  fulfil. 


Ixxiv  Poetry. 

He  could  invent,  however,  as  well  as  drill,  and  abandon 
routine  at  the  proper  time. 

Also  he  dress'd  up,  for  the  nonce,  fascines 
Like  men  with  turbans,  scimitars,  and  dirks, 

And  made  them  charge  with  bayonets  these  machines, 
By  way  of  lesson  against  actual  Turks ; 

And  when  well  practised  in  these  mimic  scenes, 
He  judged  them  proper  to  assail  the  works  ; 

At  which  your  wise  men  sneered  in  phrases  witty : 

He  made  no  answer ;  but  he  took  the  city. 

Lord  Macaulay  is  much  too  sweeping  in  his  conclu- 
sion that  Byron  had  no  dramatic  power.  The  Corsair, 
Lara,  Manfred  character,  is  artificial  and  shallow,  and 
without  question  reflects  the  superficial  affectations. 
which  Byron  found  so  telling  upon  "  folly  and  green 
minds."  But  Don  Juan  has  not  the  smallest  resem- 
blance to  the  stalking,  moon-apostrophising  Manfred  ; 
Lambro  is  not  in  the  least  like  Cain ;  and  if  Suwarrow 
shows  us  anything  of  Byron,  it  is  his  sterling  sense  and 
command  of  the  science  of  ruling  men.  "  John  John- 
son," who  accompanied  Juan  to  the  Russian  camp,  is 
dismissed  by  Macaulay  as  "a  most  signal  failure." 
The  portrait  is  sketchy  and  slight,  but  this  expression 
is  extravagantly  over-charged.  Few  as  are  the  touches 
by  which  Johnson  is  realised  for  us,  he  is  a  living  man, 
with  a  marked  and  thoroughly  English  character. 

Seldom  he  altered  feature,  hue  or  muscle, 
And  could  be  very  busy  without  bustle. 

His  meeting  with  Suwarrow — the  brief,  terse,  soldierly 
dialogue  that  passes  between  them — the  frank  yet  quite 
unsentimental  pleading  of  the  rough  but  kind  fellow 


The  Siege  of  Ismail.  Ixxv 

for  the  women — are  managed  with  dramatic  propriety. 
Suwarrow  himself  is  as  dramatically  conceived  and 
executed  as  Dalgetty. 

And  then  the  breadth,  the  occasional  sublimity,  of 
the  purely  descriptive  passages  ! — 

Hark !  through  the  silence  of  the  cold,  dull  night, 
The  hum  of  armies  gathering  rank  on  rank  ! 

Lo  !  dusky  masses  steal  in  dubious  sight 
Along  the  leaguer'd  wall  and  bristling  bank 

Of  the  armed  river,  while  with  straggling  light 

The  stars  peep  through  the  vapours  dim  and  dank, 

Which  curl  in  curious  wreaths  : — how  soon  the  smoke 

Of  hell  shall  pall  them  in  a  deeper  cloak  ! 


The  night  was  dark,  and  the  thick  mist  allowed 
Naught  to  be  seen  save  the  artillery's  flame, 

Which  arched  the  horizon  like  a  fiery  cloud, 
And  in  the  Danube's  waters  shone  the  same — 

A  mirror'd  hell !  the  volleying  roar  and  loud 
Long  booming  of  each  peal  on  peal,  o'ercame 

The  ear  far  more  than  thunder;  for  heaven's  flashes 

Spare,  or  smite  rarely — man's  make  millions  ashes. 

It  is  infinitely  to  be  regretted  that  Don  Juan,  besides 
being  unequal,  besides  having  a  great  deal  in  it  which, 
whether  as  wit,  as  wisdom,  or  as  humour,  is  wretchedly 
poor  stuff,  should  be  brought  down  to  the  level  of  Tom 
Jones ,  or  lower,  by  its  moral  taint ;  but  when  we  con- 
sider its  vast  range,  its  world-like  variety,  its  diction 
and  imagery,  strong  as  iron,  yet  fantastically  free  as 
the  tendrils,  the  wreaths,  the  festooned  briers  and 
roses  of  a  forest  lane  in  June,  can  we  think  otherwise 
than  with  surprise  that  Mr.  Arnold  should  claim  for 


Ixxvi  Poetry. 

the  poetry  of  Wordsworth  a  higher  place  than  for  the 
poetry  of  Byron  ? 

In  the  present  volume  I  try  to  give  some  account 
of  the  genius  and  productions  of  Mrs.  Browning  and 
the   Bronte  sisters.      Mrs.  Browning  was   a  poet  in 
the  simple,  yet  intense,  meaning  of  the  ancient  word 
— a  maker,  an  imaginative  life-giver  and  artist.     Cast- 
ing   the  mind's    eye   over   what   she    did   and  what 
she  was,  I  am  strongly  moved  to  claim  for  her  pre- 
cedence of  Wordsworth  in  the  procession  of  English 
poets.     In  no  poet  whatever  was  the  lyrical  glow  more 
authentically  fervid  and  genuine.     In  another  respect 
she  is  exemplary  and  classic.     The  motivation  of  her 
work  is  perfect.     To  the  great  movements,  of  thought 
and  feeling,  as  they  work  themselves  into  action  in  the 
world  of  her  time,  she   gives  intense  and  melodious 
expression.     We  may  figure   her  as  hovering  in  her 
singing  robes,  a  herald  of  victory,  over  the  van  of  the 
spiritual   armies  that  fought  the   good  fight   of  ad- 
vancing   civilisation  in  two   hemispheres,    to    strike 
down  rebellion  and  slavery  in  the  West,  and  despotism 
in  Italy.     Had  she  done  as  much  for  men  as  she  did 
for  women — had  man's  work,  passion,  character  been 
delineated  on  a  scale,  and  with  a  truth  and  power, 
correspondent  to  those  with  which,  in  the  world  of  her 
art,  she  embodied  woman's — I  scarce  know  what  place 
among  the  throned  ones  would  have  been  too  high  for 
her.     Woman,  as  Mrs.  Browning  shows  her,  is  once 
more  the  entrancing  object  that  men  have  loved  with- 
out  measure  and  without   end, — loved  as  they  have 


The  Bronte  Sisters.  Ixxvii 

been  loved  in  return,  totally,  passionately,  with  self- 
oblivious  pride, — 

Such  pride  as  from  impetuous  love  may  spring, 
That  will  not  be  refused  its  offering, — 

as  Shelley  worthily  sings.  But  Mrs.  Browning  is  not 
so  great  in  the  delineation  of  men  as  in  that  of  women. 
With  all  deductions,  I  reckon  her  one  of  the  greatest 
poets  of  her  time.  I  have,  I  think,  been  able  to  prove 
in  the  following  pages  that,  in  her  treatment  of  the 
theme  handled  by  Milton  in  Paradise  Lost,  she  has 
succeeded  in  bringing  out  the  human  tenderness  of  the 
subject,  and  imparting  a  realisable  personality  to 
Adam  and  Eve,  better  than  the  Puritan  poet. 

Of  Charlotte  Bronte  and  her  sisters  I  have  written, 
if  with  erring  appreciation,  at  least  with  honest  affec- 
tion. One's  heart  is  drawn  towards  the  three  un- 
mothered  girls  who  attracted  the  eyes  of  all  Europe  to 
the  sequestered  parsonage  among  the  Yorkshire  moors. 
What,  after  all,  can  we  say  of  genius,  but  that  it  is  in- 
scrutable, heaven-descended,  wonder-working  ?  From 
a  headland  you  look  over  a  wide  district,  all  wrapped 
in  somnolent  haze,  beneath  which  nothing  is  distinctly 
visible.  Suddenly,  through  a  rift  in  a  cloud,  a  sun- 
beam glances  from  the  blue  and  touches  one  spot. 
There,  in  piercing  brilliance,  shine  out  tower  and  tree 
and  meadow.  Then  the  cloud  closes,  the  ray  is  with- 
drawn, and  once  more  the  impartial  haze  drops  its 
shroud  upon  the  landscape.  The  genius  of  the  Bronte 
sisters  was  that  single  ray,  descending  upon  Yorkshire. 


Ixxviii  Poetry. 

So  intense  was  the  clearness  of  it,  so  fine  and  sweet 
its  beauty,  that  all  England — all  Europe— looked  to- 
wards the  remote  moorland  hill  in  the  West  Biding, 
with  its  parsonage  and  its  graves.  To  that  illuminated 
spot,  while  the  ray  still  falls  on  it,  I  invite  my  readers 
to  turn  for  a  little  time. 


ELIZABETH  BAKKETT   BROWNING. 


// 


UNIVERSITY 


CHAPTEE  I. 
HER  EARLIEST  VERSES. 

T7ILIZABETH  BAEEETT  BAEEETT,  now  better 
Pj  known  as  Mrs.  Browning,  seems  almost  lite- 
rally to  have  lisped  in  numbers.  Those  for  whom  it 
was  a  sacred  obligation  to  guard  her  fame  and  enforce 
her  wishes  manifested  the  utmost  displeasure  when 
Mr.  Herne  Shepherd,  that  inevitable  literary  treasure- 
digger,  reissued  the  verses  published  by  her  in  her 
seventeenth  year.  It  is  perhaps  not  surprising  that, 
from  the  vantage-ground  of  "  higher  things  "  to  which 
they  have  risen,  poets  should  look  with  disdainful 
irritation  on  their  "  dead  selves,"  and  ask  for  them  the 
boon  of  oblivion.  But  this  is  a  weakness. 

How  proud  we  are 
In  daring  to  look  down  upon  ourselves  ! 

says  Mrs.  Browning  in  her  mature  time,  intending  to 
signify  that  such  pride  is  not  strong,  but  weak;  not 
great,  but  mean.  No  fact  in  a  man's  history  can  do 
him  injustice,  and  the  nobly  proud  man  wants  only 
justice.  Nor  is  the  labour  of  friends,  in  guarding 
one's  reputation  from  one's  dead  self,  other  than. 

1—2 


Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 


labour  thrown  away.  The  world  inexorably  forgets 
everything  that  is  not  preserved  by  its  intrinsic  merit, 
and  inexorably  refuses  to  forget  all  that  really  takes  its 
ear.  The  few  lines  in  which,  through  some  felicity  of 
inspiration,  or  some  happy  chance  of  association  or 
local  colour,  a  boy  Cowley,  Pope,  or  Byron,  has  struck 
a  deathless  note,  are  as  safe  as  the  strains  of  their 
ripest  genius ;  but  all  the  publishers  in  England 
could  not  perpetuate  a  tenth  of  what  they  wrote  in 
boyhood. 

None  of  Mrs.  Browning's  earliest  verses  will,  I 
think,  form  part  of  the  world's  current  coin  of  poetry, 
but  they  are  pleasant  and  instructive  as  biographical 
records  of  a  poet's  youth.  They  set  before  us  her. 
bright  presence  as  she  moved  about  her  father's  par- 
sonage, an  ardent,  affectionate  girl,  not  without  her 
meditative  hours,  her  melancholy  moment  s,  but  happy 
because  full  of  love  and  truth  and  admiration.  A  long 
poem  on  Mind,  not  much  superior  on  the  whole  to 
College  prize-poetry,  is  interesting  as  a  stammering 
prophecy  of  that  intensely  spiritual  enthusiasm  which 
was  to  glow  like  purifying  fire  in  all  her  works.  The 
spirituality  of  her  poems  attests  their  high  quality ;  for 
spirituality  is  the  characteristic  of  all  supreme  art. 
It  is  because  of  its  spirituality  that  the  sculpture  of 
Greece  is  radiantly  pure.  It  treats  the  body  with  a 
sense  of  beauty  so  elevating  that,  as  we  look,  we  think 
not  of  bodily  things.  The  "  marble  burns,  and  be- 
comes transparent  with  very  spirit."  A  thoroughly 
base  painter,  on  the  other  hand,  as  Mr.  Buskin,  from 


Her  Affectionate  Nature. 


whom  these  words  are  quoted,  again  observes,  "  puts  a 
scent  of  common  flesh  about  his  marble  Christ."  To 
say  that  poetry  is  sensuous — that  it  suggests  the  body 
rather  than  the  soul,  matter  rather  than  spirit,  flesh 
rather  than  immortality — is  to  say  that  it  is  bad 
poetry.  In  Mrs.  Browning's,  from  first  to  last,  the 
spirituality  burns  with  the  intensity  of  flame. 

Another  lovely  characteristic  of  Mrs.  Browning  that 
conies  out  in  these  early  poems  is  the  strength  of  her 
domestic  affections.  She  finds  in  her  father  her  "  best 
Maecenas."  She  writes  with  tender  joy  of  her  studies 
and  readings  with  her  brother.  She  is  already  on  the 
side  of  progress  and  freedom,  and  is  the  gentlest  com- 
forter of  the  exiled  widow,  who  dies  heart-broken 
when  her  patriot  husband  is  executed.  I  quote  a 
passage  from  Mind.  We  may  note  with  interest  that 
the  poetry  freshens  and  brightens  from  commonplace 
•exactly  when  the  girl-poet  turns  from  her  books  to  her 
personal  experiences. 

If  human  faults  to  Plato's  page  belong, 

Not  even  with  Plato  willingly  go  wrong. 

But  though  the  judging  page  declare  it  well 

To  love  Truth  better  than  the  lips  which  tell; 

Yet  'twere  an  error,  with  injustice  class'd, 

T'adore  the  former,  and  neglect  the  last. 

Oh !  beats  there,  Heaven !  a  heart  of  human  frame, 

Whose  pulses  throb  not  at  some  kindling  name  ? 

Some  sound  which  brings  high  musings  in  its  track, 

Or  calls  perchance  the  days  of  childhood  back, 

In  its  dear  echo,— when,  without  a  sigh, 

Swift  hoop,  and  bounding  ball,  were  first  laid  by, 

To  clasp  in  joy,  from  schoolroom  tyrant  free 

The  classic  volume  on  the  little  knee, 

And  con  sweet  sounds  of  dearest  minstrelsy, 


Elizabeth  Barrett  Et -owning. 


Or  words  of  sterner  lore ;  the  young  brow  fraught 
With  a  calm  brightness  which  might  mimic  thought, 
Leani  on  the  boyish  hand — as,  all  the  while, 
A  half-heaved  sigh,  or  aye  th'  unconscious  smile 
Would  tell  how,  o'er  that  page,  the  soul  was  glowing, 
In  an  internal  transport,  past  the  knowing  ! 
How  feelings,  erst  unfelt,  did  then  appear, 
Give  forth  a  voice,  and  murmur,  "  We  are  here  !  " 
As  lute-strings,  which  a  strong  hand  plays  upon ; 
Or  Memnon's  statue  singing  'neath  the  sun. 

The  negative  qualities  of  these  earliest  pieces  are  a& 
good  as  their  positive.  They  are  an  effluence,  not 
strong,  but  sweet,  of  tenderness  and  of  beautiful 
enthusiasm,  and  they  are  illustriously  void  of  asperity, 
of  conventional  satire,  of  conceit,  of  any  kind  of 
flippancy.  They  show  that,  if  Mrs.  Browning  did  not 
in  her  girlish  years  write  poetry,  she  looked  poetry,, 
felt  poetry,  lived  poetry,  was  a  radiant  incarnation  of 
music  and  beauty  moving  about  the  Hereford  par- 
sonage within  sight  of  the  Malvern  Hills. 


CHAPTEK  II. 
THE  SERAPHIM,  AND  DRAMA  OF  EXILE. 

THE  first  poems  by  which  Mrs.  Browning  chose  to- 
be  permanently  represented  have  as  their  sub- 
ject that  tale  of  sin  and  redemption  which  occupied 
the. mature  genius  and  veteran  skill  of  Milton.  Speak- 
ing somewhat  largely,  we  may  say  that  the  Drama  of 
Exile  corresponds,  in  subject,  to  Milton's  Paradise 
Lost,  and  The  Seraphim  to  his  Paradise  Regained. 
In  the  Drama  of  Exile,  indeed,  the  victory  of  Christ 
is  touched  upon,  just  as  Satan's  defeat  is  referred  to  in 
Paradise  Lost,  but  it  is  in  the  second  of  Mrs. 
Browning's  poems  that  the  triumph  of  the  Saviour 
is  expressly  delineated,  as  Milton  reserved  for  Paradise 
Regained  the  specific  conflict  between  Christ  and 
Satan.  We  may,  therefore,  compare  broadly  the 
treatment  of  the  entire  theme  by  two  great  poets,  the 
one  a  man,  the  other  a  woman ;  the  one  a  Puritan, 
the  other  the  daughter  of  a  clergyman  of  the  Church 
of  England. 

As  works  of  literary  art,  the  performances  of  Mrs. 
Browning  cannot   enter   into    rivalry  with  those   of 


8  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

Milton.  In  constructive  power,  in  sustained  strength 
and  severe  beauty  of  language,  in  majestic  harmony 
and  subtle  modulation  of  music,  organ,  harp,  and 
flute,  Paradise  Lost  and  Paradise  Regained  surpass 
A  Drama  of  Exile  and  The  Seraphim.  The  language  is 
the  weakest  part  of  these  poems.  It  exhibits  Mrs. 
Browning's  mannerism  without  those  qualities  by 
which  her  mannerism  was  subsequently  softened  and 
chastened  into  a  deeper  melodiousness.  The  diction  is 
rugged ;  the  imagery  often  borders  on  the  grotesque  ; 
we  are  always  conscious  of  more  or  less  extravagance, 
always  of  more  or  less  obscurity.  The  very  first  verse 
in  the  Drama  of  Exile  has  an  oddity  of  rhyme  which 
Milton  would  never  have  let  pass.  Lucifer,  address- 
ing his  hosts,  whom  he  calls  up  to  deform  and  destroy 
the  world  which  he  has  conquered  for  them,  speaks 

thus  : 

Bejoice'in  the  clefts  of  Gehenna, 

My  exiled,  my  host ! 
Earth  has  exiles  as  hopeless  as  when  a 

Heaven's  empire  was  lost. 

On  the  other  hand,  Mrs.  Browning  is  in  some 
respects — and  these  important — more  successful  in 
the  treatment  of  the  subject  than  Milton.  She  throws 
a  finer  tenderness  into  her  portraiture  of  Adam  and 
Eve,  especially  of  the  latter.  Charlotte  Bronte  ex- 
pressed in  terms  of  scornful  brilliancy  the  dissatisfac- 
tion with  which  women  generally  look  upon  Milton's 
account  of  Eve.  It  is  a  picture  of  the  first  woman  by 
a  man  who  holds  uncompromisingly  that  woman's 
supreme  happiness  is  to  contribute  to  and  sympathise 


Milton  and  Mrs.  Browning.  9 

with  the  happiness  of  her  lord  and  master.  In  doing 
justice  to  Eve,  Mrs.  Browning  does  justice  also  to 
Adam,  breathing  passionate  life  into  the  statuesque 
propriety  of  Milton's  first  man. 

Mrs.  Browning  has  the  superiority  also  in  the  con- 
ception formed  and  the  view  presented  of  redemption. 
All  who  have  carefully  considered  Paradise  Lost  and 
Paradise  Regained  as   the  parts   of  one  great   poem 
on  sin  and  salvation,  must  have  been  struck  by  the 
fact   that   Milton  has   almost   ignored   the   death   of 
Christ.     In  Paradise  Lost  he  was  not  required  to  say 
much  of  it,  but  he  almost  wholly  omits  it  also  from 
Paradise  Regained.     The  four  books  of  that  marvel- 
lously learned  and  very  beautiful  poem  are  taken  up 
with  an  account  of  Christ's  temptation  in  the  wilder- 
ness.    The  triumph  of  Christ  over  Satan  is  viewed  by 
Milton  as  essentially  a  triumph  in  argument.     At  the 
end  of  the  argument  and  of  the  fotir  books  contain- 
ing it,  do  we  not  experience,  when  we  first  read  the 
poem,  a   sense  of  utter  incompleteness?    Additional 
books  seem   to   be   wanted  for  the  treatment  of  the 
rest  of  Christ's  life  and  of  His  death.     The  universal 
judgment  of  Christendom  has  attached  more  conse- 
quence, in  the  general  scheme  of  redemption,  to  the 
death    on   Calvary,   than  to  the    temptation    in   the 
wilderness,  and  the  body  of   Catholic  theology  cor- 
responds  to    this    Christian    sentiment.     It    is    well 
known  that  Milton  in  the  latter  portion  of  his  life 
held  Arian  opinions ;  and  the  only  way  in  which  I  can 
account  for  the    virtual    omission   of   the  crucifixion 


10  Elizabeth  Barrett  Broivning. 

from  Paradise  Eegained  is  by  supposing  that,  when  he 
wrote  the  poem,  he  had  ceased  to  accept  the  Catholic 
view  of  Christ's  death  as  a  propitiatory  sacrifice.  Be 
this,  however,  as  it  may,  Mrs.  Browning,  in  The 
Seraphim,  presents  to  us  the  victory  of  Christ  over 
evil  as  consummated  on  the  cross.  Both  in  that  poem 
and  in  the  Drama  of  Exile,  she  seeks  to  penetrate  into 
the  spiritual  meanings  of  the  death  of  Christ,  into  the 
mystery  of  sorrow  shared  by  Divinity,  into  love  that, 
through  death,  conquers  death  and  hell.  If  the  feel- 
ing of  Christendom,  sanctioned  by  the  opinion  of  such 
men  as  Lessing,  Goethe,  and  Hegel,  is  right  in  appre- 
hending atonement  as  distinctive  of  Christianity,  then 
Mrs.  Browning  must  be  allowed  to  be  more  compre- 
hensive than  Milton  in  her  treatment  of  their  common 
theme. 

The  Drama  of  Exile  opens  with  a  fiercely  exultant 
chant  poured  forth  by  Lucifer,  who  has  completed  the 
ruin  of  the  human  pair,  and  stands  on  the  outer  side 
of  the  gate  of  Eden,  near  the  flaming  sword.  He  and 
his  angels  have  fallen  from  heaven  on  account  of  their 
sin,  and  his  belief  is  that  the  Almighty  Himself  cannot 
save  any  created  being  that  once  has  sinned.  He  has 
defaced  God's  image  in  the  person  of  Adam;  "un- 
kinged is  the  king  of  the  garden  : ' '  and  he  now  calls 
upon  his  "  locusts  "  to  come  up  and  feed  in  "  the  green 
of  the  world." 

Come  up  !  we  have  conquered  by  evil. 

Good  reigns  not  alone, 
/prevail  now  !  and,  angel  or  devil. 

Inherit  a  throne  ! 


Lucifer  and  Gabriel.  11 

Suddenly  Gabriel  appears,  and  a  conversation  be- 
tween him  and  Lucifer  ensues.  It  is  but  partially 
successful.  The  words  used  by  Lucifer,  in  defiance  of 
God  and  expression  of  trust  in  his  own  resolution, 
sound  feebly  after  those  of  Milton's  Satan.  Lucifer 
affects  an  air  of  jaunty  scornfulness  and  irony  which 
recalls  the  mockery,  though  not  the  envenomed  malig- 
nity, of  Goethe's  Mephistopheles.  Gabriel  is  cour- 
teous even  to  Lucifer,  and  noble  in  all  tones  of  thought. 
The  fiend,  believing  sin  to  be,  in  the  nature  of  things, 
unpardonable,  suggests  that  he  and  his  demons  could 
stand  with  a  sword  between  man  and  Eden  as  well  as. 
Gabriel  and  his  angels.  Gabriel  replies  : 

Thou  speakest  in  the  shadow  of  thy  change. 
If  thou  hadst  gazed  upon  the  face  of  God 
This  morning  for  a  moment,  thou  hadst  known 
That  only  pity  fitly  can  chastise, 
While  hate  avenges. 

Lucifer  rejoins  that  no  pity  has  been  shown  to  him. 

When  I  fell  back,  down, — staring  up  as  I  fell, — 
The  lightnings  holding  open  my  scathed  lids, 
And  that  thought  of  the  infinite  of  God, 
Hurled  after  to  precipitate  descent ; 
When  countless  angel  faces  still  and  stern 
Pressed  out  upon  me  from  the  level  heavens 
Adown  the  abysmal  spaces,  and  I  feh1 
Trampled  down  by  your  stillness,  and  struck  blind, 
By  the  sight  within  your  eyes, — 'twas  then  I  knew 
How  ye  could  pity,  my  kind  angel-hood  ! 

Gabriel  does  not  deem  it  inconsistent  with  loyalty  to 
Heaven  to  express  sympathy  with  the  fallen  spirit. 

Yet,  thou  discrowned  one,  by  the  truth  in  me 
Which  God  keeps  in  me,  I  would  give  away 


12  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

All — save  that  truth  and  His  love  keeping  it, — 
To  lead  thee  home  again  into  the  light, 
And  hear  thy  voice  chant  with  the  morning  stars, 
When  their  rays  tremble  round  them  with  much  song 
Sung  in  more  gladness  ! 

To  the  dialogue  between  Lucifer  and  Gabriel  suc- 
ceeds a  chorus  of  Eden  spirits,  bewailing  the  expulsion 
of  the  human  pair.  Some  of  the  verses  have  a 
pathetic  beauty. 

Hearken,  oh  hearken,  ye  shall  hearken  surely, 

For  years  and  years, 
The  noise  beside  you,  dripping  coldly,  purely, 

Of  spirits'  tears ! 
The  yearning  to  a  beautiful  denied  you, 

Shall  strain  your  powers ; 
Ideal  sweetnesses  shall  overglide  you, 

Eesumed  from  ours ! 
In  all  your  music,  our  pathetic  minor 

Your  ears  shall  cross ; 
And  all  good  gifts  shall  mind  you  of  diviner, 

With  sense  of  loss ! 

On  the  whole,  however,  there  is  more  of  fancy  than 
of  true  imagination  in  this  song  of  the  river-spirits, 
bird-spirits,  and  flower-spirits  of  Eden,  and  it  is  with 
a  sense  of  relief  that,  at  its  close,  we  find  ourselves 
listening  neither  to  angels  nor  to  nightingales,  but  to 
Adam  and  Eve.  They  have  been  fleeing  before  the 
glare  of  the  flaming  sword,  and  Eve  now  sinks  down 
weary,  able  only  to  look  into  Adam's  face.  She  calls 
upon  him  to  strike  her  dead,  in  order  that,  the  curse 
having  spent  itself  on  her,  he  may  be  restored  to 
happiness. 

O  Adam,  Adam  !  by  that  name  of  Eve— 
Thine  Eve,  thy  life — which  suits  me  little  now, 


Adam  and  Eve. 


Seeing  that  I  confess  myself  thy  death 
And  thine  undoer,  as  the  snake  was  mine, — 
I  do  adjure  thee,  put  me  straight  away, 
Together  with  my  name. 

Adam  answers : 

My  beloved, 

Mine  Eve  and  life — I  have  no  other  name 
For  thee  or  for  the  sun  than  what  ye  are, 
My  utter  life  and  light !     If  we  have  fallen, 
It  is  that  we  have  sinned, — we :  God  is  just : 
And,  since  His  curse  doth  comprehend  us  both 
It  must  be  that  His  balance  holds  the  weights 
Of  first  and  last  sin  on  a  level.     What ! 
Shall  I  who  had  not  virtue  to  stand  straight 
Among  the  hills  of  Eden,  here  assume 
To  mend  the  justice  of  the  perfect  God, 
By  piling  up  a  curse  upon  His  curse, 
Against  thee — thee — 

Eve.  For  so,  perchance,  thy  God 

Might  take  thee  into  grace  for  scorning  me ; 
Thy  wrath  against  the  sinner  giving  proof 
Of  inward  abrogation  of  the  sin ! 
And  so  the  blessed  angels  might  come  down 
And  walk  with  thee  as  erst. 

The  self-sacrificing  nobleness  of  Eve  calls  forth  all  the 
chivalry  of  Adam's  nature,  and  he  tells  her  that  he  is 
the  greater  transgressor  of  the  two. 

If  God,— 

Who  gave  the  right  and  joyaunce  of  the  world 
Both  unto  thee  and  me, — gave  thee  to  me, 
The  best  gift  last,  the  last  sin  was  the  worst, 
Which  sinned  against  more  complement  of  gifts 
And  grace  of  giving.     God  !  I  render  back 
Strong  benediction  and  perpetual  praise 
From  mortal  feeble  lips  (as  incense -snioke, 
Out  of  a  little  censer,  may  fill  heaven), 
That  Thou,  in  striking  my  benumbed  hands 
And  forcing  them  to  drop  all  other  boons 


14  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

Of  beauty,  and  dominion,  and  delight, — 
Hast  left  this  well-beloved  Eve — this  life 
Within  life — this  best  gift  between  their  palms, 
In  gracious  compensation  ! 

Milton  does  not  make  Adam  say  anything  so  nobly 
beautiful  as  that.  Eve  replies. 

Eve.  Is  it  thy  voice  ? 

Or  some  saluting  angel's— calling  home 
My  feet  into  the  garden  ? 

Adam.  O  my  God  ! 

I,  standing  here  between  the  glory  and  dark — 
The  glory  of  Thy  wrath  projected  forth 
From  Eden's  wall,  the  dark  of  our  distress 
Which  settles  a  step  off  in  that  drear  world — 
Lift  up  to  Thee  the  hands  from  whence  hath  faUen 
Only  creation's  sceptre — thanking  Thee 
That  rather  Thou  hast  cast  me  out  with  her, 
Than  left  me  lorn  of  her  in  Paradise, 
With  angel  looks  and  angel  songs  around 
To  show  the  absence  of  her  eyes  and  voice. 

The  sense  of  this  is  as  deep  and  true  as  the  poetry 
is  beautiful.  It  is  not  possible  for  us  to  conceive  how, 
in  this  world  at  least,  human  beings  could  be  much  to 
each  other,  and  human  affection  have  exercise  and 
expansion,  if  there  were  no  want,  no  sorrow,  no  toil, 
no  necessity  of  mutual  ministering.  Physical  evil  is 
in  our  planet  a  condition  of  moral  progress,  and  it  was 
in  the  first  pangs  of  sorrow  and  suffering  that  the 
exiles  from  Eden  would  know  how  dear  they  were 
to  each  other. 

Hitherto  the  poet  has  shown  us  chiefly  the  com- 
pensations and  redeeming  features  of  the  state  into 
which  Adam  and  Eve  have  fallen ;  but  the  tragedy 


Sin  and  Sorrow.  15 


now  begins  to  deepen.  By  imagery  too  gigantesque 
and  vague — the  signs  of  the  zodiac  being  introduced 
into  the  machinery  of  the  poem — the  anguish  of  the 
creatures  of  the  earth,  on  account  of  the  sin  that  has 
been  brought  into  it,  is  shadowed  forth. 

That  phantasm,  there, 
Presents  a  lion — albeit  twenty  times 
As  large  as  any  lion — with  a  roar 
Set  soundless  in  his  vibratoiy  jaws, 
And  a  strange  horror  stirring  in  his  mane  ! 
And,  there,  a  pendulous  shadow  seems  to  weigh — 
Good  against  ill,  perchance ;  and,  there,  a  crab 
Puts  coldly  out  its  gradual  shadow-claws, 
Like  a  slow  blot  that  spreads — till  all  the  ground, 
Crawled  over  by  it,  seems  to  crawl  itself. 

The  Spirit  of  the  Earth,  that  once  sang  only  of  joy 
and  peace,  now  mourns  perpetually. 

I  feel  your  steps,  O  wandering  sinners,  strike 
A  sense  of  death  to  me,  and  undug  graves ! 

The  heart  of  earth,  once  calm,  is  trembling  like 
The  ragged  foam  along  the  ocean  waves  : 

The  restless  earthquakes  rock  against  each  other  ; 

The  elements  moan  round  me — "  Mother,  mother," 
And  I  wail ! 

The  feeling  with  which  Lucifer  regards  the  exiles 
from  Eden  is  that  of  scorn,  modified  by  a  sense  of  their 
advantage  over  him  in  being  able  to  pray  to  God 
and  to  hope  for  pardon.  This  is  the  peculiarity  of 
Mrs.  Browning's  Lucifer  as  distinguished  from 
Milton's  devil,  and  from  Goethe's.  I  am  not  sure 
that  Mrs.  Browning  has  kept  the  character  in  perfect 
consistency  with  itself.  Lucifer  at  first  appears  to  be 
exultant,  confident,  resolute  in  his  sin,  and  proud  of  it. 


16  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

The  red  sign 

Burnt  on  my  forehead,  which  you  taunt  me  with, 
Is  God's  sign  that  it  bows  not  unto  God, 
The  potter's  mark  upoh  his  work,  to  show 
It  rings  well  to  the  striker. 

This  is  not  the  speech  we  should  expect  from  one 
who  appreciates  the  infinite  advantage  over  him 
possessed  by  the  human  pair  in  that  they  are  admitted 
to  converse  with  God.  "  Your  prayers,"  says  Lucifer, 
"  tread  high  as  angels."  They  are  not  doomed,  as  he 
says  that  he  is,  to  hate,  and  tempt,  and  destroy.  His 
hatred  of  them  "  glares  without,  because  it  burns 
within,"  with  the  searching  fires  of  remorse. 

I,  angel,  in  antagonism 
To  God  and  His  reflex  beatitudes, 
Moan  ever  in  the  central  universe 
With  the  great  woe  of  striving  against  Love — 
And  gasp  for  space  amid  the  Infinite. 

The  Satan  of  Paradise  Lost  would  never  have  said 
that  ;  but  I  shall  not  assert  the  same .  so  decisively  of 
the  Satan  of  Paradise  Regained,  for  the  fiend  of 
Milton's  second  poem  is  much  softened  down.  Mrs. 
Browning  is  careful  to  make  it  appear  that  Lucifer 
does  not  repent.  He  is  "  self-elect  to  Kingship  of 
resistant  agony  toward  the  good;  "  and,  therefore,  her 
delineation  may  be  formally  consistent  with  itself. 
But  such  a  conception  of  the  character  embraces 
elements  of  essential  impossibility  and  contradictori- 
ness.  A  spirit  that  felt  it  to  be  anguish  to  contend 
against  love  would  be  at  heart  a  good  spirit. 

Bowed  and  bent  almost  to  despair  by  the  cruelty  of 
the  creatures  that  in  Eden  had  been  their  obedient 


Christ  Appears.  17 


servants,  Adam  and  Eve  now  cry  to  God,  the- latter 
placing  her  hope  in  the  promise. 

0  my  Seed, 

Through  the  tempestuous  years  that  rain  so  thick 
Betwixt  my  ghostly  vision  and  thy  face, 
Let  me  have  token  ;  for  my  soul  is  bruised 
Before  the  serpent's  head  is. 

In  answer  to  this  appeal,  "  a  vision  of  Christ 
appears  in  the  midst  of  the  zodiac,  which  pales  before 
the  heavenly  light."  The  vision  rebukes  the  spirits  of 
the  earth  for  the  "  cruel  and  unmitigated  blame  "  they 
have  cast  upon  their  masters. 

This  regent  and  sublime  Humanity, 

Though  fallen,  exceeds  you  !     This  shall  film  your  sun, 

Shall  hunt  your  lightning  to  its  lair  of  cloud, 

Turn  back  your  rivers,  footpath  all  your  seas, 

Lay  flat  your  forests,  master  with  a  look 

Your  lion  at  his  fasting.     .     .     . 

Over  you 

Eeceive  man's  sceptre, — therefore  be  content 
To  minister  with  voluntary  grace 
And  melancholy  pardon  every  rite 
And  function  in  you,  to  the  human  hand. 

He  bids  Adam  be  the  spokesman  of  blessing  to  Eve. 

Speak,  Adam.     Bless  the  woman,  man ; 
It  is  thine  office. 

Adam's  blessing  is  in  itself  a  beautiful  and  touching 
poem,  full  of  wise  meaning.  I  abridge  it  very  con- 
siderably. 

Eaise  the  majesties 

Of  thy  disconsolate  brows,  O  well-beloved, 
And  front  with  level  eyelids  the  To  come, 
And  all  the  dark  o'  the  world.     Eise,  woman,  rise 

2 


18  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

To  thy  peculiar  and  best  altitudes 

Of  doing  good  and  of  enduring  ill, — 

Of  comforting  for  ill,  and  teaching  good, 

And  reconciling  all  that  ill  and  good 

Unto  the  patience  of  a  constant  hope, — 

Eise  with  thy  daughters !     If  sin  came  by  thee, 

And  by  sin  death,  the  ransom-righteousness, 

The  heavenly  life,  and  compensative  rest 

Shall  come  by  means  of  thee.     Be  satisfied  ; 

Something  thou  hast  to  bear  through  womanhood, 

Peculiar  suffering  answering  to  the  sin, — 

Some  pang  paid  down  for  each  new  human  life, 

Some  weariness  in  guarding  such  a  life, 

Some  coldness  from  the  guarded,  some  mistrust, 

And  pressures  of  an  alien  tyranny 

With  its  dynastic  reasons  of  larger  bones 

And  stronger  sinews.     But,  go  to  !  thy  love 

Shall  chant  itself  its  own  beatitudes, 

After  its  own  life-working.     A  child's  kiss, 

Set  on  thy  sighing  lips,  shall  make  thee  glad  ; 

A  poor  man,  served  by  thee,  shall  make  thee  rich ; 

A  sick  man,  helped  by  thee,  shall  make  thee  strong ; 

Thou  shalt  be  served  thyself  by  every  sense 

Of  service  which  thou  renderest.     .     .     . 

Thy  hand  which  plucked  the  apple,  I  clasp  close, — 

I  bless  thee  in  the  name  of  Paradise, 

And  by  the  memory  of  Edenic  joys 

Forfeit  and  lost 

I  bless  thee  to  the  desert  and  the  thorns, 
To  the  elemental  change  and  turbulence, 
And  to  the  roar  of  the  estranged  beasts, 
And  to  the  solemn  dignities  of  grief, — 
To  each  one  of  these  ends — and  to  their  END 
Of  death  and  the  hereafter. 

The  rest  of  the  poem  is  taken  up  with  prophetic 
adumbration  of  the  victory  of  Christ.  Lucifer  learns 
that  he  shall  be  finally  baffled,  because  the  sorrow  in 
which  he  thought  it  impossible  that  God  could  share 


The  Divine  Man.  19 


has  been  partaken  of  by  the  Divine  Man,  and  Christ 
has  become  "  an  exile  from  His  heaven,  to  lead  these 
exiles  homeward." 

I  cannot  do  justice  to  these  poems  without  quoting 
one  or  two  additional  passages  illustrative  of  their 
imaginative  and  intellectual  power,  and  the  strength, 
blended  with  splendour,  of  their  language.  In  a 
passage  as  thoughtful  as  it  is  beautiful,  words  are  put 
into  the  mouth  of  Christ,  describing  the  influence  of 
His  life  and  death  upon  the  human  family.  The  poet 
writes  as  one  who  believes  the  prophecy  she  records. 
At  this  time  Mrs.  Browning's  mind  was  thoroughly 
imbued  with  what  would  be  called  evangelical  the- 
ology. The  prophecy  has,  in  great  part,  still  to  be 
fulfilled,  but  in  its  fulfilment  is  the  best  hope  of  the 
world.  Christ  speaks : 

At  last, 

I,  wrapping  round  Me  your  humanity, 
"Which,  being  sustained,  shall  never  break  nor  burn 
Beneath  the  fire  of  Godhead,  will  tread  earth, 
And  ransom  you  and  it,  and  set  strong  peace 
Betwixt  you  and  its  creatures.     With  My  pangs 
I  will  confront  your  sins ;  and  since  those  sins 
Have  sunken  to  all  Nature's  heart  from  yours, 
The  tears  of  My  clean  soul  shall  follow  them, 
And  set  a  holy  passion  to  work  clear 
Absolute  consecration.     In  My  brow 
Of  kingly  whiteness  shall  be  crowned  anew 
Your  discrowned  human  nature.     Look  on  Me ! 
As  I  shall  be  uplifted  on  a  cross 
In  darkness  of  eclipse  and  anguish  dread, 
So  shall  I  lift  up  in  My  pierced  hands, 
Not  into  dark,  but  light — not  unto  death, 
But  life, — beyond  the  reach  of  guilt  and  grief, 
The  whole  creation.     Henceforth  in  My  name 

2—2 


20  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

Take  courage,  O  thou  woman — man,  take  hope ! 

Your  grave  shall  be  as  smooth  as  Eden's  sward, 

Beneath  the  steps  of  your  prospective  thoughts, 

And,  one  step  past  it,  a  new  Eden-gate 

Shall  open  on  a  hinge  of  harmony, 

And  let  you  through  to  mercy.     Ye  shall  fall 

No  more,  within  that  Eden,  nor  pass  out 

Any  more  from  it.     In  which  hope,  move  on, 

First  sinners  and  first  mourners.     Live  and  love, — 

Doing  both  nobly,  because  lowlily  ! 

Live  and  work,  strongly, — because  patiently ! 

And,  for  the  deed  of  death,  trust  it  to  God 

That  it  be  well  done,  unrepented  of, 

And  not  to  loss.     And  thence,  with  constant  prayers 

Fasten  your  souls  so  high,  that  constantly 

The  smile  of  your  heroic  cheer  may  float 

Above  all  floods  of  earthly  agonies, 

Purification  being  the  joy  of  pain  ! 

It  is  written  that  the  last  enemy  that  shall  be  over- 
come is  Death.  With  sublime  audacity  the  young 
poet-woman  imaginatively  realises  the  taming  and 
slaying  of  the  pale  horse  on  which  rides  Death. 
Christ  "  shall  quell  him  with  a  breath,  and  shall  lead 
him  where  He  will,  with  a  whisper  in  the  ear,  full  of 
fear,  and  a  hand  upon  the  mane,  grand  and  still." 
What  woman  has  ever  lived  except  Mrs.  Browning 
that  could  have  imagined  and  achieved  the  following 
passage  ?  It  contains  some  fantastic  lines,  but  the 
imagination  of  a  great  poet  throbs  audibly  in  it  as  a 
whole. 

Through  the  flats  of  Hades,  where  the  souls  assemble, 
He  will  guide  the  Death-steed  calm  between  their  ranks, 
While,  like  beaten  dogs,  they  a  little  moan  and  tremble 
To  see  the  darkness  curdle  from  the  horse's  glittering  flanks. 
Through  the  flats  of  Hades,  where  the  dreary  shade  is, — 


Death-steed.  21 


Up  the  steep  of  heaven,  will  the  Tamer  guide  the  steed, — 

Up  the  spheric  circles — circle  above  circle, 

We  who  count  the  ages  shall  count  the  tolling  tread — 

Every  hoof-fall  striking  a  blinder,  blanker  sparkle 

From  the  stony  orbs,  which  shall  show  as  they  were  dead, 

All  the  way  the  Death-steed  with  tolling  hoofs  shall  travel, 

Ashen  grey  the  planets  shall  be  motionless  as  stones, 

Loosely  shall  the  systems  eject  their  parts  coeval, — 

Stagnant  in  the  spaces,  shall  float  the  pallid  moons ; 

Suns  that  touch  their  apogees,  reeling  from  their  level, 

Shall  run  back  on  their  axles^in  wild,  low,  broken  tunes  ; 

Up  against  the  arches  of  the  crystal  ceiling 

From  the  horse's  nostrils  shall  steam  the  blurting  breath  ; 

Up  between  the  angels  pale  with  silent  feeling, 

Will  the  Tamer  calmly  lead  the  horse  of  Death  ; 

Cleaving  all  that  silence,  cleaving  all  that  glory, 

Will  the  Tamer  lead  him  straightway  to  the  Throne  : 

"  Look  out,  O  Jehovah,  to  this  I  bring  before  Thee 

With  a  hand  nail-pierced, — I,  who  am  Thy  Son." 

Then  the  Eye  Divinest,  from  the  Deepest,  flaming 

On  the  mystic  courser,  shall  look  out  in  fire ! 

Blind  the  beast  shall  stagger  where  It  overcame  him, — 

Meek  as  lamb  at  pasture — bloodless  in  desire — 

Down  the  beast  shall  shiver, — slain  amid  the  taming, — 

And,  by  Life  essential,  the  phantasm  Death  expire. 

Hitherto  our  quotations  have  been  from  the  Drama 
of  Exile.  The  next  is  from  The  Seraphim.  That 
poem  describes  the  emotions  with  which  Zerah  and 
Ador,  two  of  the  heavenly  host,  contemplate  the  work 
of  Christ  upon  earth,  and  in  particular  the  death  upon 
Calvary.  One  or  two  descriptive  touches,  rendering 
the  appearance  of  the  crowd,  are  terrible  in  their 
graphic  vividness. 

With  the  living's  pride 
They  stare  at  those  who  die, — who  hang 
In  their  sight  and  die.     They  bear  the  streak 


22  Elizabeth  Barrett  Broivning. 

Of  the  crosses'  shadow,  black  not  wide, 
To  fall  on  their  heads,  as  it  swerves  aside 

When  the  victims'  pang 

Makes  the  crosses  creak. 

The  thieves,  penitent  and  impenitent,  who  were 
crucified  with  Christ,  are  depicted. 

Zerah.  One 

Is  as  a  man  who  has  sinned,  and  still 
Doth  wear  the  wicked  will, 
The  hard  malign  life-energy, 
Tossed  outward,  in  the  parting  soul's  disdain, 
On  brow  and  lip  that  cannot  change  again. 

Ador.  And  one — 

Zerah.  Has  also  sinned. 

And  yet  (0  marvel !)  doth  the  Spirit-wind 
Blow  white  those  waters  ?— Death  upon  his  face 
Is  rather  shine  than  shade, 
A  tender  shine  by  looks  beloved  made. 
He  seemeth  dying  in  a  quiet  place, 
And  less  by  iron  wounds  in  hands  and  feet, 
Than  heart-broke  by  new  joy  too  sudden  and  sweet. 

Could  anything  be  more  tender  in  its  loveliness  than 
the  line,  "  He  seemeth  dying  in  a  quiet  place  "  ? 

While  the  seraphs  look  upon  the  crucifixion,  they 
muse  on  the  fact  that,  much  as  they  and  their  angel 
kindred  may  love  God,  they  cannot  love  Him  so  well 
as  redeemed  mankind. 

Ador.  Do  we  love  not  ? 

Zerah.  Yea, 

But  not  as  man  shall !  Not  with  life  for  death, 
New-throbbing  through  the  startled  being !     Not 
"With  strange  astonished  smiles,  that  ever  may 
Gush  passionate  like  tears  and  fill  their  place ! 
Nor  yet  with  speechless  memories  of  what 


Christ  on  the  Cross.  23 


Earth's  winters  were,  enverduring  the  green 

Of  every  heavenly  palm, 

Whose  windless,  shadeless  calm 
Moves  only  at  the  breath  of  the  Unseen. 
Oh,  not  with  this  blood  on  us — and  this  face, — 
Still,  haply,  pale  with  sorrow  that  it  bore 
In  our  behalf,  and  tender  evermore 
With  nature  all  our  own,  upon  us  gazing  ! — 
Nor  yet  with  these  forgiving  hands  upraising 
Their  unreproachful  wounds,  alone  to  bless. 

Love  Hun  more,  O  man  ! 

Than  sinless  seraphs  can. 

The  description  of  the  moment  when  Christ  dies, 
and  the  earth  is  shrouded  in  darkness,  is  one  of  the 
most  sublime  passages  that  has  been  written  since  the 
death  of  Milton. 

Zerah.  The  pathos  hath  the  day  undone : 
The  death-look  of  His  eyes 
Hath  overcome  the  sun, 
And  made  it  sicken  in  its  narrow  skies. 
Ador.  Is  it  to  death  ?     He  dieth. 

Zerah.  Through  the  dark 

He  still,  He  only,  is  discernible — 
The  naked  hands  and  feet,  transfixed  stark, 
The  countenance  of  patient  anguish  white, 
Do  make  themselves  a  light 

More  dreadful  than  the  glooms  which  round  them  dwell, 
And  therein  do  they  shine. 

The  epilogue,  in  which  the  poet  gently  comments  on 
her  own  daring  song,  is  full  of  grace  and  pathos. 

Ah !  what  am  I 
To  counterfeit,  with  faculty  earth-darkened, 

Seraphic  brows  of  light 
And  seraph  language  never  used  nor  hearkened  ? 


24  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

Ah  me !  What  word  that  seraphs  say  could  come 
From  mouth  so  used  to  sighs — so  soon  to  lie 
Signless,  because  then  breathless  in  the  tomb  ? 

****** 
Forgive  me,  that  mine  earthly  heart  should  dare 
Shape  images  of  unincarnate  spirits, 
And  lay  upon  their  burning  lips  a  thought 
Cold  with  the  weeping  which  mine  earth  inherits ! 
And  though  ye  find  in  such  hoarse  music,  wrought 
To  copy  yours,  a  cadence  all  the  while 
Of  sin  and  sorrow — only  pitying  smile ! — 

Ye  know  to  pity,  well. 
I,  too,  may  haply  smile  another  day 
At  the  far  recollection  of  this  lay, 
When  God  may  call  me  in  your  midst  to  dwell, 
To  hear  your  most  sweet  music's  miracle 
And  see  your  wondrous  faces.     May  it  be  ! 
For  His  remembered  sake,^he  Slain  on  rood, 
Who  rolled  His  earthly,  garment  red  in  blood 
(Treading  the  wine-press)  that  the  weajk,  like  me, 
Before  His  heavenly  throne  should  walk  in  white. 

Such  are  the  astonishing  poems  in  which  Elizabeth 
Barrett  Barrett,  now  above  thirty,  announced  that 
another  great  poet  had  arisen  in  England,  a  poet 
of  almost  excessive  fervour  and  intensity,  whose 
imagination  would  quail  before  nothing  in  heaven, 
earth,  or  hell,  and  who  possessed,  at  the  same  time, 
the  deepest  tenderness  that  could  dwell  in  a  woman's 
heart.  Putting  aside  Dante  and  Milton,  T  know 
nothing  in  religious  poetry  at  all  comparable,  for 
imaginative  power,  with  the  Drama  of  Exile  and  The 
Seraphim.  That  they  are  imperishable  is,  I  should 
say,  probable ;  but  the  probability  is  clouded  with  a 
doubt  from  the  fact  that  they  are  conspicuously  defec- 
tive in  one  quality  of  great  and  deathless  poetry,  to 


The  Defect  of  these  Poems.  25 

wit,  simplicity.  Able  as  she  was  to  use  "  the  mother 
tongue  of  noble  passion,"  the  woman  singer  could  not 
perfectly  trust  to  simple  language.  It  would,  perhaps, 
be  more  correct  to  say  that  her  imagination  was  too 
vehement,  too  impetuous,  to  be  restrained  by  judgment, 
and  that,  like  a  strong,  wild  horse  of  the  desert,  when 
first  mounted,  it  took  the  bit  in  its  teeth  and  ran  away 
with  the  rider.  At  all  events,  the  imagery  of  these 
poems,  especially  of  the  first,  is  so  vaguely  gorgeous 
and  erudite, — the  invention  so  elaborate  and  complex, 
— that  many  readers  will  be  -permanently  repelled 
by  them.  "The  sense  reels,"  I  wrote  formerly,  and 
a  new  reading  has  not  altered  my  opinion,  "  under  the 
bewildering  pageantry  of  earth  spirits,  and  bird  spirits, 
and  river  spirits,  of  zodiacs,  and  stars,  and  chorussing 
angels;  the  mind  is  perplexed  with  gnomons,  and 
apogees,  and  vibrations,  and  infinites.  One  stares  on 
all  this  as  one  might  on  the  foam,  glorious  in  its 
shivered  snow  and  wavering  irises,  which  roars  and 
raves  round  a  coral  reef.  The  vessel  draws  near  the 
reef,  and  many  an  eye  looks  into  the  foam ;  but  its 
beauty  fascinates  only  for  a  moment,  and  the  sail  fills, 
and  the  island  is  left  for  ever.  Never,  perhaps,  is  it 
known  that  in  the  heart  of  that  island,  hidden  by  the 
torn  fringes  of  tinted  foam,  there  was  soft  green  grass, 
and  a  quiet,  crystal  fountain,  and  cottages  smiling  in 
the  light  of  flowers,  and  all  the  home  affections." 

I  beg  to  express  the  earnest  hope  that  my  readers, 
if  they  have  not  yet  studied  these  memorable  poems, 
will  not  permit  themselves-  to  be  repelled  by  the 


26  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

demands  they  make  upon  the  attention  and  the 
thinking  faculty.  They  bear  throughout  the  impress 
of  an  original  mind  and  a  sovereign  imagination,  and 
the  deep  beating  of  a  woman's  heart  makes  rare,  sweet 
melody  in  them  from  first  to  last.  Amid  the  stormy 
grandeurs  of  their  imagery,  this  deep  music  comes  in 
with  enhanced  effect,  as  the  penetrating  tenderness  of 
"  Home,  Sweet  Home  "  might  come  in  amid  the  melo- 
dious crash  and  clamour  of  orchestral  thunderings. 


CHAPTEK  III. 
A    VISION    OF  POETS,   AND    THE    POET'S    VOW. 

IN  A  Vision  of  Poets  and  The  Poet's  Vow,  the  in- 
fluence of  Tennyson  is  traceable.  If  A  Dream  of 
Fair  Women  and  The  Palace  of  A  rt  had  never  been 
written,  the  likelihood  is  that  neither  would  have  seen 
the  light.  And  yet  it  is  not  easy  to  point  out  the 
effect  produced  by  Tennyson,  for  the  poems  are  in 
different  measures  from  his,  and  the  mode  of  treat- 
ment in  the  respective  works  is  diverse.  The  influence 
is  felt — first,  in  cadences  that  recall  Tennysonian 
tones  ;  secondly,  in  the  construction  of  one,  at  least,  of 
the  poems ;  and,  thirdly,  in  their  reasonings  and  con- 
clusions. A  Vision  of  Poets  opens  thus  : 

A  poet  could  not  sleep  aright, 

For  his  soul  kept  up  too  much  light 

Under  his  eyelids  for  the  night. 

And  thus  he  rose  disquieted 

With  sweet  rhymes  ringing  through  his  head, 

And  in  the  forest  wandered. 

In  Tennyson's  Dream  of  Fair  Women,  the  poet  falls 
asleep  and  straightway  wanders  in  "an  old  wood." 
The  resemblance  here  is  so  close  that,  although  Mrs. 


28  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

Browning,  in  the  subsequent  arrangement  of  her 
machinery,  does  not  follow  Tennyson,  the  recollec- 
tion of  it  clings  to  the  reader.  I  cannot  say  that,  in 
the  invention  and  delineation  of  the  visions  which  the 
hero  of  Mrs.  Browning's  poems  sees  in  the  forest,  she 
is  so  felicitous  as  Tennyson.  Again  she  lacks  sim- 
plicity. Her  poem  is  too  long,  also,  and  she  detracts 
from  the  effect  of  stanzas  of  great  power  and  splen- 
dour by  addition  of  others  that  are  of  far  inferior 
excellence.  Nevertheless,  there  is  in  the  piece  the 
vitality  of  genius.  Several  of  the  word-portraits  of 
"  God's  prophets  of  the  Beautiful  "  are  true  to  the  life 
and  rich  in  suggestive  meaning. 

Here,  Homer,  with  the  broad  suspense 
Of  thunderous  brows,  and  lips  intense 
Of  garrulous  god-innocence. 

The  "broad  suspense  of  thunderous  brows  "  has,  to 
my  thinking,  more  sound  than  sense  ;  but  the  "  garru- 
lous god-innocence  " — the  child-like,  joyous  conscious- 
ness that  gods  and  heroes  are  inexpressibly  interesting, 
and  worthy  of  being  talked  about  and  sung  about 
without  end — must  strike  every  one  who  at  all  knows 
the  Homeric  poems  as  singularly  happy  and  accurate. 

There  Shakespeare  !  on  whose  forehead  climb 
The  crowns  of  the  world.     Oh,  eyes  sublime 
With  tears  and  laughter  for  all  time ! 

Turning  again  to  the  ancients,  she  throws  a  few 
words  on  the  page,  and  likeness  after  likeness  starts  up. 

Hesiod  old, 

Who,  somewhat  blind  and  deaf  and  cold, 
Cared  most  for  gods  and  bulls.     And  bold, 


Prophets  of  the  Beautiful.  29 

Electric  Pindar,  quick  as  fear, 

With  race -dust  on  his  cheeks,  and  clear 

Slant  startled  eyes  that  seem  to  hear 

The  chariot  rounding  the  last  goal, 
To  hurtle  past  it  in  its  soul. 
And  Sappho,  with  that  gloriole 

Of  ebon  hair  on  calmed  brows — 
0,  poet- woman  !  none  foregoes 
The  leap,  attaining  the  repose ! 

She  throws  Spenser  into  a  group  with  Ariosto,  and 
adds  a  stanza  which  hardly  does  justice  to  Dante. 

And  Spenser  drooped  his  dreaming  head 
(With  languid  sleep -smile  you  had  said 
From  his  own  verse  engendered) 

On  Ariosto's,  till  they  ran 
Their  curls  in  one. — The  Italian 
Shot  nimbler  heat  of  bolder  man 

From  his  fine  lids.     And  Dante  stern 
And  sweet,  whose  spirit  was  an  urn 
For  wine  and  milk,  poured  out  in  turn. 

We  have  sketches  of  Alfieri,  Berni,  Tasso,  Kacine, 
Corneille,  Petrarch,  Camoens,  Calderon,  De  Vega, 
Goethe,  Schiller,  Chaucer,  and  many  more.  I  can 
make  room  only  for  Milton,  Burns,  and  Shelley. 

Here  Milton's  eyes  strike  piercing-dim : 
The  shapes  of  suns  and  stars  did  swim 
Like  clouds  from  them,  and  granted  him 

God  for  sole  vision.     .     .     , 

And  Burns,  with  pungent  passionings 
Set  in  his  eyes.    Deep  lyric  springs 
Are  of  the  fire-mount's  issuings. 

And  Shelley,  in  his  white  ideal, 
All  statue  blind. 


30  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

There  is  immense  ability  crowded  into  these  brief 
limnings.  The  pungent  passionings  of  Burns's  eyes — 
the  volcanic  fire  of  soul  from  which  gushed  forth  his 
songs — these  are  the  descriptive  strokes  of  one  who 
had  looked  into  the  very  heart  of  the  man.  Scott  saw 
Burns  once,  but  he  never  forgot  his  eyes,  which 
burned,  says  Sir  Walter,  like  gig-lamps.  The  lines  on 
Shelley  are  as  wonderful  as  any  in  the  poem.  "  The 
words  contain,"  I  said  once,  "  the  key  to  Shelley's 
biography.  It  was  precisely  the  dazzling  radiance  of 
Shelley's  ideal  which  struck  him  stone-blind  to  the 
actual  world." 

As  we  proceed  in  our  examination  of  Mrs.  Brown- 
ing's poems,  we  find  them  becoming  more  human  in 
subject  and  more  simple  in  treatment.  Lucifer  and 
Gabriel  and  the  Seraphim  give  place  to  earth-born 
poets ;  but  even  the  poets  form  part  of  the  pageantry 
of  a  vision.  In  The  Poet's  Vow,  however,  we  have 
human  personages,  without  any  visionary  or  phantas- 
magoric aids  or  hindrances  to  the  imagination.  At 
the  outset — in  the  second  and  third  stanzas  of  the 
poem — there  occurs  a  brief  but  beautiful  description  of 
evening. 

The  rowers  lift  their  oars  to  view 

Each  other  in  the  sea, 
The  landsmen  watch  the  rocking  boats 

In  a  pleasant  company, 
While  up  the  hill  go  gladlier  still 

Dear  friends  by  two  and  three. 

The  peasant's  wife  hath  looked  without 
Her  cottage  door  and  smiled, 


The  Poet's  Vow.  31 


For  there  the  peasant  drops  his  spade 

To  clasp  his  youngest  child 
Which  hath  no  speech,  but  his  hands  can  reach 

And  stroke  his  forehead  mild. 

This  picture  of  Nature's  hushed  landscape  at  the  fall 
of  evening  prepares  us  for  the  strikingly  original  con- 
ception of  a  man — a  poet — whose  very  serenity  attests 
the  coldness  of  his  heart. 

You  would  not  think  that  brow  coiild  e'er 

Ungentle  moods  express  : 
Yet  seemed  it,  in  this  troubled  world, 

Too  calm  for  gentleness  ; 
When  the  very  star,  that  shines  from  afar, 

Shines  trembling,  ne'ertheless. 

There  was  in  his  face  none  of  that  "softening  light" 
which  the  presence  of  others,  awakening  sympathy  in 
us,  supplies.  "  None  gazed  within  the  poet's  face;  the 
poet  gazed  in  none  ;  "  he  had  resolved  to  wean  himself 
from  all  association  with  the  base  brotherhood  of  man- 
kind, to  be  rid  of  the  "  weights  and  shows  of  sensual 
things,'*  to  hear  no  cry  haunting  the  earth  as  with  the 
appeal  of  Abel's  blood.  Earth,  he  says,  with  all  her 
creatures,  has  been  cursed  in  the  curse  of  man ;  but  he 
does  not  partake  in  the  sin ;  and,  in  sympathy  with 
Nature,  he  is  sensible  of  "an  holy  wrath  "  that  impels 
him  to  break  the  bondage  knitting  him  to  his  kind. 
Accordingly  he  makes  a  vow,  to  this  effect : — 

Hear  me  forswear  man's  sympathies, 

His  pleasant  yea  and  no — 
His  riot  on  the  piteous  earth 

Whereon  his  thistles  grow ! 
His  changing  love — with  stars  above  ! 

His  pride — with  graves  below ! 


32  Elizabeth  Barrett  Broioning. 

Hear  me  forswear  his  roof  by  night, 

His  bread  and  salt  by  day, 
His  talkings  at  the  wood-fire  hearth, 

His  greetings  by  the  way, 
His  answering  looks,  his  systemed  books, 

All  man,  for  aye  and  aye. 

Alone  with  Nature,  he  expects  that  his  purged  heart, 
"  rent  "  from  its  human  debasements,  will  drink  of 
Nature's  wine  of  wonder  and  beauty,  and  that  he  will 
share  with  clouds  and  trees  and  waters  the  blessing  of 
serenity  which  they  had  before  earth  was  blasted  by 
Adam's  sin.  The  mystic  affection  of  Nature  encircling 
him  will  be  better  than  that  of  child,  friend,  wife,  or 
countryman. 

And  ever,  when  I  lift  my  brow 

At  evening  to  the  sun, 
No  voice  of  woman  or  of  child 

Recording  "Day  is  done," 
Your  silence  shall  a  love  express 

More  deep  than  such  an  one ! 

Having  determined  irrevocably,  he  takes  measures 
to  give  effect  to  his  resolution.  Sharing  his  silver  and 
gold  among  his  crowding  friends,  he  finds  his  gifts 
accepted  with  bland  complacency,  and  his  hand  taken, 
for  the  last  time,  "  in  a  somewhat  slacker  hold."  The 
crowd  having  passed  away,  he  has  to  deal  with  two 
who  remain,  one  of  them  his  friend  of  friends  among 
men,  the  other  his  more  than  friend  among  women. 
He  proposes  that  his  best  friend  shall  wed  Rosalind, 
his  "plighted  bride,"  that  his  ancestral  lands  shall 
serve  her  for  dower,  and  that  the  pair  shall  neither 


Rosalind  and  Sir  Roland.  33 

remember  nor  lament  him.     Kosalind  looks  upon  him 
silently,  with  unspeakable  meaning  in  her  face, 

Like  a  child  that  never  knew  but  love, 
Whom  words  of  wrath  surprise. 

The  tears  come  when  she  attempts  to  speak,  but  at 
last  her  words  make  way,  and  she  gently  remonstrates 
against  his  gospel  of  heartless  pride. 

I  thought — but  I  am  half  a  child, 

And  very  sage  art  thou — 
The  teachings  of  the  heaven  and  earth 

Should  keep  us  soft  and  low. 

She  spurns,  as  every  true  woman  would,  his  con- 
siderate offer  of  a  livelihood.  If  Elaine  cannot  have 
Lancelot,  the  knight  may  keep  his  proffered  money. 
Nor  will  Rosalind  marry  the  respected  friend  to  whom 
her  lover  graciously  hands  her  over. 

I  will  not  live  Sir  Eoland's  bride— 

That  dower  I  will  not  hold ! 
I  tread  below  my  feet  that  go, 

These  parchments  bought  and  sold. 
The  tears  I  weep  are  mine  to  keep, 

And  worthier  than  thy  gold. 

Sir  Roland  rebukes  him  in  terms  less  touching,  but 
more  sublime. 

And  thou,  0  distant,  sinful  heart, 

That  climbest  up  so  high, 
To  wrap  and  blind  thee  with  the  snows 

That  cause  to  dream  and  die — 
What  blessing  can  from  lips  of  man 

Approach  thee  with  his  sigh  ? 

Ay !  what,  from  earth — create  for  man, 
And  moaning  in  his  moan  ? 


34  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

Ay !  what  from  stars — revealed  to  man, 

And  man-named,  one  by  one  ? 
Ay,  more  !  what  blessing  can  be  given, 
Where  the  spirits  seven  do  show  in  heaven 

A  MAN  upon  the  throne  ? — 

A  man  on  earth  He  wandered  once, 

All  meek  and  undefiled  : 
And  those  who  loved  Him,  said  "  He  wept  " — 

None  ever  said  He  smiled, 
Yet  there  might  have  been  a  smile  unseen, 
When  He  bowed  His  holy  face,  I  ween, 

To  bless  that  happy  child. 

The  poet  persists  in  his  purpose.  If  Rosalind  and 
Sir  Eoland  will  not  have  his  lands,  the  poor  shall  be 
endowed  with  them.  For  his  part,  he  betakes  him 
to  the  ruined  hall  of  Courland,  where  bats  cling  to 
the  ceilings  and  lizards  run  on  the  floors,  to  live  in 
isolation  from  mankind. 

Year  after  year  passes  on ;  but  whether  it  is  that 
Christians  wend  by  to  their  prayers,  or  that  bridal 
parties  trip  along  in  festive  array,  or  that  little 
children  stand  near  the  wall  to  see  the  green  lizards, 
he  has  no  word,  no  blessing,  no  sympathy  for  any- 
thing in  human  shape. 

Rosalind,  pining  heart-broken,  lies  at  last  on  her 
death-bed.  She  then  tells  the  "  loving  nurse "  to 
smooth  her  tresses  when  she  is  dead,  to  uplift  her 
hands,  laying  them,  palm  to  palm,  to  place  her  on  a 
bier,  and  to  put  beneath  her  head  a  pillow  formed  of 
flowers  like  those  which  she  used  to  gather  when  she 
and  her  poet-lover  played  as  children  in  the  woods. 
When  "  the  corpse 's  smile  "  appeared  on  the  face,  the 


The  Procession  of  the  Corpse.  35 

nurse  was  to  place  upon  the  breast  a  scroll,  and  "  the 
youngest  children  dear  "  were  to  carry  the  dead 
Kosalind,  not  to  the  churchyard,  but  to  the  old  hall 
of  Courland. 

And  up  the  bank  where  I  used  to  sit 

And  dream  what  life  would  be, 
Along  the  brook,  with  its  sunny  look 

Akin  to  living  glee, 
O'er  the  windy  hill,  through  the  forest  still, 

Let  them  gently  carry  me. 

***** 

And  when  withal  they  near  the  hall, 

In  silence  let  them  lay 
My  bier  before  the  bolted  door, 

And  leave  it  for  a  day  : 
For  I  have  vowed,  though  I  am  proud, 
To  go  there  as  a  guest  in  shroud, 

And  not  be  turned  away. 

These  instructions  are  obeyed.  The  poet,  secure  at 
midnight  from  human  intrusion,  unbolts  his  door, 
looks  out  beneath  the  stars,  and  sees  their  cold  light 
on  the  face  of  the  dead. 

It  lay  before  him,  human-like, 

Yet  so  unlike  a  thing ! 
More  awful  in  its  shrouded  pomp 

Than  any  crowned  king, 
All  calm  and  cold,  as  it  did  hold 

Some  secret,  glorying. 

A  heavier  weight  than  of  its  clay 

Clung  to  his  heart  and  knee, 
As  if  those  folded  palms  could  strike, 

He  staggered  groaningly, 
And  then  o'erhung,  without  a  groan, 
The  meek  close  mouth  that  smiled  alone, 

Whose  speech  the  scroll  must  be. 

3—2 


36  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

The  words  of  the  scroll  are  too  many  for  quotation, 
except  in  part. 

I  have  prayed  for  thee  with  silent  lips 

In  the  anguish  none  could  see ; 
They  whispered  oft,  "  She  sleepeth  soft  "— 

But  I  only  prayed  for  thee. 

Go  to !  I  pray  for  thee  no  more — 

The  corpse's  tongue  is  still. 
Its  folded  fingers  point  to  heaven, 

But  point  there  stiff  and  chill. 
No  farther  wrong,  no  farther  woe, 
Hath  license  from  the  sin  below 

Its  tranquil  heart  to  thrill. 

I  charge  thee,  by  the  living's  prayer, 

And  the  dead's  silentness, 
To  wring  from  out  thy  soul  a  cry 

Which  God  shall  hear  and  bless ! 
Lest  heaven's  own  palm  droop  in  my  hand, 
And  pale  among  the  saints  I  stand, 

A  saint  companionless. 

The  parallelism  between  the  death  of  Rosalind  and 
the  journey  of  her  corpse  to  the  hall  of  Courland  and 
the  death  of  Elaine  and  the  journey  of  her  corpse  to 
Camelot,  as  detailed  in  one  of  Tennyson's  Idylls,  can 
hardly  escape  notice.  Mrs.  Browning,  however,  was 
first  in  the  field,  unless,  indeed,  the  journey  of  the 
dead  Kosalind  was  suggested  by  the  voyage  of 
the  Lady  of  Shalott,  which  may,  I  think,  be  fairly 
excluded  from  the  list  of  probabilities.  There  can,  at 
all  events,  be  no  dispute  as  to  the  originality  of  Mrs. 
Browning  in  relation  to  the  part  played  by  the  corpse. 
The  dead  Lady  of  Shalott  has  no  scroll  on  breast  or  in 
hand,  and  the  scroll  was  laid  by  Mrs.  Browning  on  the 
breast  of  her  Kosalind  before  the  letter  was  put  into 


The  Poet  Vanquished.  37 

the  dead  hand  of  Elaine  by  Tennyson.  Rosalind's 
scroll,  moreover,  serves  a  more  important  purpose 
than  Elaine's  letter.  Elaine  comes  to  take  farewell  of 
Lancelot.  She  makes  no  complaint,  utters  no  re- 
proach, asks  Lancelot  to  join  others  in  praying  for  her 
soul  as  "a  knight  peerless."  The  conception  of  an 
appeal  made  by  the  dead  to  the  living,  as  a  means  of 
producing  a  complete  change  and  transformation  in 
the  latter,  belongs  exclusively  to  Mrs.  Browning.  The 
appeal  of  the  dead  Rosalind  proves  irresistible.  The 
poet  bows  his  face  on  the  corpse  in  a  paroxysm  of 
anguish  and  remorse. 

'Twas  a  dread  sight  to  see  them  so — 
For  the  senseless  corpse  rocked  to  and  fro 
With  the  wail  of  his  living  mind. 

His  "  long-subjected  humanness "  asserted  itself 
with  lion-like  strength,  "and  fiercely  rent  its  tenement 
in  a  mortal  agony." 

I  tell  you,  friends,  had  you  heard  his  wail, 
'Twould  haunt  you  in  court  and  mart, 

And  in  merry  feast  until  you  set 
Your  cup  down  to  depart — 

That  weeping  wild  of  a  reckless  child 
From  a  proud  man's  broken  heart. 

Meanwhile  the  "  worshipped  earth  and  sky,"  the 
stars  and  hills  for  which  he  had  renounced  human 
fellowship,  "  looked  on  all  indifferently."  Finding  no 
solace"  in  these,  he  turned  to  his  dead  Rosalind  and 
died  upon  her  breast : 

For  when  they  came  at  dawn  of  day 
To  lift  the  lady's  corpse  away, 
Her  bier  was  holding  twain. 


38  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

Tennyson,  describing  the  temptation  treated  of  in 
The  Palace  of  Art,  says  that  •"  he  that  shuts  love  out, 
in  turn  shall  be  shut  out  from  love,  and  on  her 
threshold  lie  howling  in  outer  darkness."  The  words 
are  an  expressive  statement  of  Mrs.  Browning's  thesis 
in  A  Poet's  Vow.  But  there  is  a  difference  in  the  way 
in  which,  in  the  respective  poems,  the  temptation  is 
yielded  to.  The  "  sinful  soul "  of  Tennyson's  allegory 
turns  from  the  crowd — from  the  nation — from  the 
general  mass  of  mankind,  but  by  no  means  relinquishes 
humanity.  She  takes  refuge  in  art,  in  literature,  in 
philosophy.  She  dwells  with  the  great  poetic  makers 
of  all  time.  Sculpture  and  painting  fill  the  corridors 
of  her  palace  with  images,  and  light  up  its  walls  with 
pictures.  She  hates  mankind,  but  adores  the  select 
few  who  have  risen  above  the  multitude,  and  the  very 
essence  of  her  sin  is  the  pride  on  which  she  values 
herself  as  a  sister  of  these.  Mrs.  Browning's  poet 
forsakes  man  altogether,  his  "  systemed  books "  as 
well  as  his  popular  follies,  his  poems  and  pictures  as 
well  as  his  senates  and  market-places,  and  seeks,  in 
the  companionship  of  Nature,  a  sympathy  more  pure* 
lofty,  and  serene  than  humanity,  high  or  low,  can 
yield.  Her  poem,  therefore,  is  the  ethical  complement 
of  Tennyson's,  and  The  Palace  of  Art  and  A  Poet's 
Vow  form  between  them  an  exhaustive  treatment, 
under  poetic  symbols,  of  the  cardinal  sin  of  isolation 
from  human  interests,  duties,  affections,  joys,  and 
griefs. 


CHAPTEE  IV. 

THE  ROMAUNT  OF  'MARGRET— ISOBEL'S  CHILD 
—THE  ROMANCE  OF  THE  SWAN'S  NEST- 
BERTHA  IN  THE  LANE. 

THE  Romaunt  of  Margret  is  cast,  to  some  extent, 
in  the  mould  of  the  old  ballads, — to  about  the 
same  extent  as  Eossetti's  Sister  Helen, — but  it  lacks 
the  simplicity  of  the  deep-thoughted  harpers  and 
minstrels  whose  reliques  were  collected  by  Bishop 
Percy  and  Walter  Scott.  It  is  a  mysterious,  painful, 
uncanny  poem,  suggestive  of  ghosts  and  haunted 
river-sides,  and  telling,  dimly  and  eerily,  a  tale  of 
love  and  suicide.  A  "  fair  ladye  "  sits  by  a  river  that 
runs  by  a  hill  and  through  forest  trees,  dreaming 
pleasantly  of  her  lover.  The  darkness  of  night  deepens 
the  black  of  her  hair,  "  and  the  pale  moonlight  on  her 
forehead  white  like  a  spirit's  hand  is  laid."  Her  shadow 
lies  on  the  river,  steady  and  changeless  while  the  river 
never  rests : 

Most  like  a  trusting  heart 

Upon  a  passing  faith, — 
Or  as,  upon  the  course  of  life, 

The  steadfast  doom  of  death. 


40  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

We  now  begin  to  feel  that  the  forest  is  the  scene 
of  some  "enchantment  drear."  The  lady's  shadow 
collects  itself  into  a  wraith  or  double. 

It  shaketh  without  wind, 

It  parteth  from  the  tide, 
It  standeth  upright  in  the  cleft  moonlight — 

It  sitteth  at  her  side. 

Look  in  its  face,  ladye,  • 

And  keep  thee  from  thy  swound ! 
With  a  spirit  bold  thy  pulses  hold, 

And  hear  its  voice's  sound ! 

For  so  will  sound  thy  voice, 

When  thy  face  is  to  the  wall ! 
And  such  wiU  be  thy  face,  ladye, 

When  the  maidens  work  thy  pall ! 

The  lady  and  her  ghostly  double  engage  in  talk,  and 
though  it  is  difficult  to  assign  a  precise  meaning  to 
the  utterances  of  the  wraith,  they  imply  that,  for  some 
too  darkly-hinted  reason,  the  lady  has  lost  the  supreme 
and  trustful  love  of  her  brother,  her  sister,  and  her 
father,  and  that  her  chosen  knight  is  dead.  The 
wraith,  after  telling  her  that  those  of  her  own  blood 
have  ceased  to  love  her,  speaks  of  the  absent 
knight : — 

He  loved  but  only  thee  ! 

That  love  is  transient,  too, 
The  wild  hawk's  bill  doth  dabble  still 

I'  the  mouth  that  vowed  thee  true. 
Will  he  open  his  dull  eyes, 

When  tears  fall  on  his  brow  ? 
Behold,  the  death-worm  to  his  heart 

Is  a  nearer  thing  than  thou. 


The  Romaunt  of  Margret.  41 

Accepting  these  intimations  of  her  other  self,  the 
lady  decides  that  life  is  intolerable. 

Her  face  was  on  the  ground — 

None  saw  the  agony  ! 
But  the  men  at  sea  did  that  night  agree 

They  heard  a  drowning  cry. 
And  when  the  morning  brake, 

Fast  rolled  the  river's  tide, 
With  the  green  trees  waving  overhead, 

And  a  white  corse  laid  beside. 

The  gloomy  intent  of  the  whole  poem  seems  to  be 
suggested  in  the  last  four  lines. 

O  failing  human  love ! 

O  light  by  darkness  known ! 
0  false,  the  while  thou  treadest  earth, 

O  deaf,  beneath  the  stone ! 

Whether  the  pride  of  the  baron,  her  father,  in  whose 
court  are  a  hundred  knights,  had  parted  the  lovers,  we 
are  not  distinctly  told.  As  much  may,  however,  be 
inferred  ;  for  while  the  brother  and  sister  weep  for  the 
lady  and  kiss  her  corpse,  the  baron  stands  "alone  yet 
proudly  "  in  his  hall.  Pride  and  death  have  triumphed 
over  love.  The  poem  displays  imaginative  power,  but 
the  machinery,  though  perhaps  in  keeping  with  that 
of  the  old  folk-lore  ballads,  is  grotesque.  It  is  an 
attempt  to  realise  in  poetic  form  the  semi-delirious 
dreamings  of  an  unhappy  lady  before  committing 
suicide ;  and  it  may  be  doubted  whether  such  a  subject 
was  worthy  of  Mrs.  Browning. 

In  Isabel's  Child  our  woman-poet  is  again  at  her 
strongest.  For  torrent-like  fulness  of  meaning,  for 


42  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

rich  and  solemn  swell  of  musical  harmony,  for  the 
compression  that  betokens  maturity  of  power,  for 
truth  of  imaginative  colouring,  this  poem  is  perhaps 
superior  to  anything  we  have  yet  examined  of  her 
work.  She  wrote  it  before  her  marriage,  yet  it  seems 
safe  to  say  that  the  emotions  of  maternity  were  never 
expressed  with  such  impassioned  tenderness. 

The  weary  nurse  has  gone  to  rest,  tired  by  an  eight- 
day  watch,  and  now  Isobel  takes  her  babe  on  her  own 
knee,  rejoicing  inexpressibly  in  the  thought  that  the 
fever  is  waning,  that  the  child  is  sleeping  well  in  the 
shadow  of  her  smile.  Outside,  the  sun  is  darkened  as 
if  in  strange  eclipse,  the  forest  and  the  clouds  are  rent 
or  tossed  with  storm,  but  the  external  noises  only 
deepen  the  silent  joy  of  the  mother's  soul. 

So  motionless  she  sate, 
The  babe  asleep  upon  her  knees, 
You  might  have  dreamed  their  souls  had  gone 
Away  to  things  inanimate, 
In  such  to  live,  in  such  to  moan  ; 
And  that  their  bodies  had  ta'en  back, 
In  mystic  change,  all  silences 
That  cross  the  sky  in  cloudy  rack, 
Or  dwell  beneath  the  reedy  ground 
In  waters  safe  from  their  own  sound. 

Only  she  wore 

The  deepening  smile  I  named  before, 
And  that  a  deepening  love  expressed— 
And  who  at  once  can  love  and  rest  ? 

Her  smile  was  joyful  in  proportion  to  the  anxiety 
she  had  suffered  in  the  eight-day  watch,  which,  indeed, 
had  been  "  an  eight-day  weeping."  The  picture  of  the 
mother  and  the  child — say,  rather  the  group  chiselled 


Isobel's  Child.  43 


by  fine  words  as  if  in  vivid  marble — is  a  thing  to  be 
remembered. 

Motionless  she  sate, 

Her  hair  had  fallen  by  its  weight 

On  each  side  of  her  smile,  and  lay 

Very  blackly  on  the  arm 

Where  the  baby  nestled  warm, — 

Pale  as  baby  carved  in  stone 

Seen  by  glimpses  of  the  moon 

Up  a  dark  cathedral  aisle  ! 

But,  through  the  storm,  no  moonbeam  fell 

Upon  the  child  of  Isobel — 

Perhaps  you  saw  it  by  the  ray 

Alone  of  her  still  smile. 

We  now  learn  that,  during  the  eight  days  of 
watching,  Isobel  had  prayed  importunately  that  her 
child  might  live.  She  had  been  bold  in  her  prayer. 

Oh,  take  not,  Lord,  my  babe  away — 
Oh,  take  not  to  Thy  songful  heaven, 
The  pretty  baby  Thou  hast  given. 

*  *  *  *  * 

Think,  God  among  the  cherubim, 

How  I  shall  shiver  every  day 

In  Thy  June  sunshine,  knowing  where 

The  grave-grass  keeps  it  from  his  fair 

Still  cheeks !  and  feel  at  every  tread 

His  little  body  which  is  dead 

And  hidden  in  the  turfy  fold, 

Doth  make  the  whole  warm  earth  a- cold ! 

0  God,  I  am  so  young,  so  young — 

1  am  not  used  to  tears  at  nights 
Instead  of  slumber — nor  to  prayer 
With  sobbing  lips  and  hands  outwrung  ! 

*  *  *  *  * 
Dear  Lord,  who  spreadest  out  above 
Thy  loving,  transpierced  hands  to  meet 
All  lifted  hearts  with  blessing  sweet, — 


44  Elizabeth  Barrett  Broivning. 

Pierce  not  my  heart,  my  tender  heart, 
Thou  madest  tender  !     Thou  who  art 
So  happy  in  Thy  heaven  alway, 
Take  not  mine  only  bliss  away  ! 

Her  petition  is  granted.  The  child  is  manifestly 
recovering.  But,  with  a  touch  of  the  supernatural, 
which  is  well  managed  in  the  poem,  the  baby  begins 
to  speak  to  Isobel  and  she  listens. 

0  mother,  mother,  loose  thy  prayer  ! 
Christ's  name  hath  made  it  strong  ! 

It  bindeth  me,  it  holdeth  me 
With  its  most  loving  cruelty 
From  floating  my  new  soul  along 

The  happy,  heavenly  air  ! 
It  bindeth  me,  it  holdeth  me 
In  all  this  dark,  upon  this  dull 

Low  earth,  by  only  weepers  trod ! — 
It  bindeth  me,  it  holdeth  me  ! 
Mine  angel  looketh  sorrowful 

Upon  the  face  of  God. 

The  child  prevails.  The  prayer  is  recalled.  When 
the  nurse,  awakening  in  the  morning  sun,  looks  to  the 
mother,  she  sees  the  babe  dead  on  Isobel' s  arm.  She 
could  utter  no  cry,  so  calm  was  the  mother's  face. 

"  Wake,  nurse  !  "  the  lady  said  : 
"  We  are  waking — he  and  I — 

1  on  earth,  and  he  in  sky  ! 

And  thou  must  help  me  to  o'erlay 
With  garment  white  this  little  clay, 
Which  needs  no  more  our  lullaby. 

I  changed  the  cruel  prayer  I  made, 
And  bowed  my  meekened  face,  and  prayed 
That  God  would  do  His  will !  and  thus 
He  did  it,  nurse  !     He  parted  us. 
And  His  sun  shows  victorious 


Little  Ellie.  45 


The  dead  calm  face,  and  I  am  calm; 
And  Heaven  is  hearkening  a  new  psalm." 

Resigned  to  wait  until  she  shall  meet  her  child  in 
heaven,  she  addresses  herself  to  her  earthly  duties, 
satisfied  that  God's  will  is  more  loving  than  hers. 

The  Eomance  of  the  Swan's  Nest  is  a  brilliant  little 
poem,  delicately  light  in  its  pictorial  touch,  pensively 
gay  in  its  musical  cadence.  It  opens  with  a  vignette 
portrait  of  the  heroine. 

Little  Ellie  sits  alone 
'Mid  the  beeches  of  a  meadow, 

By  a  stream-side,  on  the  grass, 

And  the  trees  are  showering  down 
Doubles  of  their  leaves  in  shadow, 

On  her  shining  face  and  hair. 

She  has  thrown  her  bonnet  by  ; 
And  her  feet  she  has  been  dipping 

In  the  shallow  water's  flow— 

Now  she  holds  them  nakedly 
In  her  hands,  all  sleek  and  dripping, 

While  she  rocketh  to  and  fro. 

As  she  rocks,  she  thinks  of  a  swan's  nest,  with  two 
precious  eggs,  which  she  has  found  among  the  reeds. 
A  vision  of  the  knight  who  is  to  he  her  lover  rises 
before  her.  He  will  be  a  noble  fellow,  playing  on 
the  lute  to  the  enchantment  of  ladies,  smiting  with 
the  sword  to  the  astonishment  of  men ;  and  his  steed 
is  to  be  a  red-roan  steed  of  steeds,  shod  in  silvei 
and  housed  in  blue.  This  paragon  is  to  be  sent  by 
little  Ellie  "to  put  away  all  wrong,"  and  to  empty  the 
quiver  of  the  wicked.  Three  times  he  is  to  send  his 


46  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

foot-page  to  Ellie  for  a  word  of  comfort.  She  is  to  be 
coy  and  proud.  The  first  time  she  will  send  him  a 
white  rose-bud ;  the  second  a  glove  ;  at  the  third  time 
of  asking,  she  will  permit  him  to  return  and  claim  her 
hand.  When  he  has  come,  and  they  are  man  and 
wife,  she  will  show  him  the  swan's  nest  among  the 
reeds.  Mrs.  Browning  shall  tell  the  rest. 

Little  Ellie,  with  her  smile 
Not  yet  ended,  rose  up  gaily ,— 

Tied  the  bonnet,  donned  the  shoe— 

And  went  homeward,  round  a  mile, 
Just  to  see,  as  she  did  daily, 

What  more  eggs  were  with  the  two. 

Pushing  through  the  elm-tree  copse, 
Winding  by  the  stream,  light-hearted, 

Where  the  osier  pathway  leads — 

Past  the  boughs  she  stoops — and  stops  : 
Lo  !  the  wild  swan  had  deserted — 

And  a  rat  had  gnawed  the  reeds. 

Ellie  went  home  sad  and  slow. 
If  she  found  the  lover  ever, 

With  his  red-roan  steed  of  steeds, 

Sooth  I  know  not !  but  I  know 
She  could  never  show  him — never, 

That  swan's  nest  among  the  reeds  ! 

Bertha  in  the  Lane  calls  for  no  special  remark. 
The  heroine  dies  of  a  broken  heart,  because  her 
lover  forsakes  her  for  her  younger  sister.  The  tone  of 
the  poem  is  oppressively  sad.  In  Bertha  the  poet 
depicts  one  of  those  weak,  gentle,  beautiful,  ill-starred 
persons,  who  seem  born  to  make  way  for  happier  and 
more  potent  natures.  The  following  lines  describe  the 


Bertha  in  the  Lane.  47 

character  with  psychological  exactness  and  fine  poetic 
imagery.  It  is  Bertha  who  speaks,  addressing  the 
sister  who  has  been  preferred  by  the  lover. 

I  had  died,  dear,  all  the  same- 
Life's  long,  joyous,  jostling  game 
Is  too  loud  for  my  meek  shame. 

We  are  so  unlike  each  other, 

Thou  and  I,  that  none  could  guess 

We  were  children  of  one  mother, 
But  for  mutual  tenderness. 

Thou  art  rose -lined  from  the  cold, 

And  meant,  verily,  to  hold 

Life's  pure  pleasures  manifold. 

I  am  pale  as  crocus  grows 

Close  beside  a  rose-tree's  root ! 
Whosoe'er  would  reach  the  rose, 

Treads  the  crocus  underfoot — 
JT,  like  May-bloom  on  thorn-tree— 
Thou,  like  merry  summer  bee  ! 
Fit,  that  I  be  plucked  for  thee. 


CHAPTEK  V. 


1  HER  PHILANTHROPIC  POETRY.     THE  RUNAWAY 
SLAVE;  THE  CRY  OF  THE  CHILDREN. 

MKS.  BKOWNING,  as  is  attested  by  every  one  of 
her  works  from  which  I  have  quoted,  wrote 
not  under  the  impulse  of  mere  art-enthusiasm,  but  in 
the  expression  of  emotions  and  convictions  intensely 
her  own.  It  was  natural  for  such  a  poet  that  the 
great  agitations  of  her  time  should  draw  responses 
from  her  heart,  and  that,  when  she  sympathised  with 
any  movement  for  the  bettering  of  mankind,  and  the 
vanquishing  of  wrong,  she  should  make  her  voice 
heard  in  tones  of  thrilling  melody  above  the  clamours 
of  the  conflict. 

In  the  poem  entitled  The  Runaway  Slave  at 
Pilgrim's  Point,  she  tells,  in  her  own  rapid,  ve- 
hement, suggestive  manner,  a  tale  of  infinite  cruelty 
and  wrong  inflicted  upon  a  woman  slave.  The  piece 
is  thrown  into  the  form  of  a  monologue,  the  injured 
slave  being  the  narrator  of  her  own  sorrows.  She 
finds  in  her  black  colour  an  inevitable  and  terrible 
curse,  and  wonders  why,  since  the  dark  bird  sings 
merrily  in  the  wood,  and  the  darkest  night  is  passed 


The  Runaway  Slave.  49 

over  by  the   sweetest   stars,  black  human  creatures 
should  seem  so  God-forsaken. 

Indeed  we  live  beneath  the  sky, 

That  great  smooth  Hand  of  God  stretched  out 
On  all  His  children  fatherly 

To  save  them  from  the  dread  and  doubt 
Which  would  be,  if,  from  this  low  place, 
All  opened  straight  up  to  His  face 

Into  the  grand  eternity. 

And  still  God's  sunshine  and  His  frost, 
They  make  us  hot,  they  make  us  cold, 

As  if  we  were  not  black  and  lost : 

And  the  beasts  and  birds,  in  wood  and  fold 

Do  fear  and  take  us  for  very  men  ! 

Could  the  weep -poor- will  or  the  cat  of  the  glen 
Look  into  my  eyes  and  be  bold  ? 

But  though  the  blue  sky  was  above  her  head,  "like 
God's  great  pity,"  yet,  when  she  and  the  slave  youth 
whom  she  loved  prayed  to  God,  no  dew  of  blessing 
had  descended  on  them. 

I  look  on  the  sky  and  the  sea, 

We  were  two  to  love,  and  two  to  pray, — 

Yes,  two,  O  God,  who  cried  to  Thee, 
Though  nothing  didst  Thou  say. 

Coldly  Thou  sat'st  behind  the  sun ! 

And  now  I  cry  who  am  but  one, 
How  wilt  Thou  speak  to-day  ? 

They  two  were  black.  They  "  had  no  claim  to  love 
and  bliss."  The  oppressors  "wrung"  her  cold  hand 
out  of  his. 

They  dragged  him — where  ?    I  crawled  to  touch 
His  blood's  mark  in  the  dust ! 

4 


50  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

To  the  murder  of  her  lover  "  a  deeper  wrong  "  was 
added. 

Mere  grief's  too  good  for  such  as  I, 

So  the  white  men  brought  the  shame,  ere  long 
To  strangle  the  sob  of  my  agony. 

She  had  a  child.  Its  whiteness  pained  her.  When 
she  glanced  on  its  face  she  saw  a  look  that  made  her 
mad, — 

The  master's  look,  that  used  to  fall 
On  my  soul  like  his  lash,  or  worse. 

In  her  madness  she  was  prompted  to  curse  it ;  4o 
save  it  from  her  curse,  she  strangled  it.  She  wandered 
in  the  forest  till  her  madness  passed  away,  and  then 
the  pursuers  came  upon  her. 

I  am  not  mad :  I  am  black. 

I  see  you  staring  in  my  face — 
I  know  you  staring,  shrinking  back — 

Ye  are  born  of  the  Washington-race  : 
And  this  land  is  the  free  America  : 
And  this  mark  on  my  wrist  (I  prove  what  I  say) 

Ropes  tied  me  up  here  to  the  flogging-place. 

She  dies  cursing  the  white  men  in  her  "  broken 
heart's  disdain,"  after  calling  the  slaves  to  rise  and  end 
what  she  has  begun.  This  is  an  appalling  story, 
almost  too  haggard  and  hideous  in  its  details  for  art, 
but  not  too  strongly  coloured  for  reality,  and  not,  I 
think,  open  to  legitimate  objection  as  a  contribution  to 
the  literature  of  slave  emancipation.  If  the  anger 
of  the  world  is  to  be  invoked  against  a  wrong, 
especially  when  that  wrong  is  so  ancient  and  so 
firmly  buttressed  about  by  interests  as  was  American 


The  Cry  of  the  Children.  51 

slavery,  its  features  must  be  portrayed  in  all  their 
blackness. 

I  am  not  prepared  to  say  that  there  is  enough  of 
intrinsic  beauty,    music,   and  power  in  this  terrible 
poem  to  ensure  its  long  outliving  the  baneful  system 
which  it  did  its  part  to   overthrow  /  but  there    is 
j  nothing  from  Mrs.  Browning's  pen  more  inspired  in  its 
*  melody,  or  more   glorious  in  its  tragic  beauty  and 
pathos, — more  instinct  with  what  Mr.  Buskin  calls 
the  stuff  of  immortality, — than  that  to  which  I  next 
call  the  reader's  attention.      I  refer  to  the  celebrated 
piece  in  which  she  lent  her  advocacy  to  the  cause  of 
the  young  creatures  worn  to  an  untimely  death  in 
,    English  factories.      The  Cry  of  the  Children  is  as  sure 
i    to  live  as  Hood's  Song  of  the  Shirt  or  Bridge  of  Sighs. 
J     It  is  composed  in  stanzas  twelve  lines  long,  each  of 
them  coming  like  a  great  wave  of  rhythmic  sound, 

burdened  with  meaning  and  appeal,  and  breaking  with 

)  a  power  that  must  shake  the  flintiest  heart.  In  the 
)  first  of  them  we  feel  that  Mrs.  Browning  is  in  her 
highest  mood,  like  that  of  Deborah  when  she  called 
upon  Israel,  or  that  of  the  Delphic  priestess  when  the 
temple  rang  with  the  clamorous  earnestness  of  her 
message.  \ 

Do  ye  heaj»4he  children  weeping,  O  my  brothers, 

Ere  the  sorrow  conies  with  years  ? 
They  are  leaning  their  young  heads  against  their  mothers, — 

And  that  cannot  stop  their  tears. 
The  young  lambs  are  bleating  in  the  meadows, 

The  young  birds  are  chirping  in  the  nest, 
The  young  fawns  are  playing  with  the  shadows, 

The  young  flowers  are  blowing  towards  the  west — 

4—2 


52  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

But  the  young,  young  children,  O  my  brothers, 

They  are  weeping  bitterly ! — 
They  are  weeping  in  the  playtime  of  the  others, 

In  the  country  of  the  free. 

They  look  up  "  with  their  pale  and  sunken  faces," 
and  the  anguish  of  hoary  age  "  draws  and  presses 
down  the  cheeks  of  infancy."  They  have  taken  but 
few  steps  on  the  earth,  yet  they  are  already  weary, 
and  their  "grave-rest"  is  far  to  seek.  They  some- 
times, indeed,  die  when  still  children ;  hut  why,  they 
ask,  should  they  wish  to  live  ?  When  "  little  Alice '' 
died,  they  looked  into  the  pit  in  which  she  was  laid, 
and  saw  no  room  in  it  for  work.  None  would  cry  to 
her,  as  she  slept  in  that  bed,  "  Get  up,  little  Alice  !  it 
is  day."  If  they  saw  her,  they  would  not  know  her, 
for  she  has  been  long  enough  away  from  work  to 
let  a  smile  grow  upon  her  face.  "  It  is  good  when  it 
happens,"  say  the  children,  "that  we  die  before 
our  time."  In  vain  you  call  them  into  the  fields  to 
play. 

"  For  oh,"  say  the  children,  "  we  are  weary, 

And  we  cannot  run  or  leap — 
If  we  cared  for  any  meadows,  it  were  merely 

To  drop  down  in  them  and  sleep. 
Our  knees  tremble  sorely  in  the  stooping — 

We  fall  upon  our  faces  trying  to  go  ; 
And,  underneath  our  heavy  eyelids  drooping, 

The  reddest  flower  would  look  as  pale  as  snow. 
For  all  day  we  drag  our  burden  tiring 

Through  the  coal-dark  underground — 
Or,  all  day,  we  drive  the  wheels  of  iron 

In  the  factories  round  and  round. 


The  Cry  of  the  Children.  53 

"  For,  all  day  the  wheels  are  droning,  turning — 

Their  wind  comes  in  our  faces — 
Till  our  hearts  turn — our  heads,  with  pulses  burning, 

And  the  walls  turn  in  their  places — 
Turns  the  sky  in  the  high  window  blank  and  reeling — 

Turns  the  long  light  that  drops  adown  the  wall — 
Turn  the  black  flies  that  crawl  along  the  ceiling — 

All  are  turning,  all  the  day,  and  we  with  all — 
And  all  day  the  iron  wheels  are  droning ; 

And  sometimes  we  could  pray, 
'  O  ye  wheels  '  (breaking  out  in  a  mad  moaning) 

«  Stop  !  be  silent  for  to-day  ! '  " 

Vain,  also,  is  it  to  tell  the  children  to  pray.  The 
metallic  motion  and  clang  around  them  make  their 
voices  inaudible  to  the  men  who  are  near  them,  and 
how  could  God  hear?  Two  words  only  they  re- 
member in  the  nature  of  prayer,  and  these — "  Our 
Father " — they  utter  at  midnight  as  a  charm.  Mrs. 
Browning  informs  us  in  a  footnote  that  this  was  an 
historical  fact.  If  God  heard  the  words,  He  would 
surely,  think  the  little  ones,  send  them  some  assuage* 
ment  of  their  anguish. 

"  But  no  !  "  say  the  children,  weeping  faster, 

"  He  is  speechless  as  a  stone ; 
And  they  tell  us  of  His  image  is  the  master 

Who  commands  us  to  work  on." 
"  Go  to !  "  say  the  children, — "up  in  heaven, 

Dark,  wheel-like,  turning  clouds  are  all  we  find. 
Do  not  mock  us ;  grief  has  made  us  unbelieving — 

We  look  up  for  God,  but  tears  have  made  us  blind." 
Do  you  hear  the  children  weeping  and  disproving, 

O  my  brothers,  what  ye  preach  ? 
For  God's  possible  is  taught  by  His  world's  loving — 

And  the  children  doubt  of  each. 

It  is  some  consolation,  after  reading  these  terrible 


54  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

lines,  to  know  that,  in  this  case  also,  Mrs.  Browning's 
words  were  not  thrown  away,  and  that  the  imperious 
cry  of  England's  relenting  heart  quelled  and  over- 
came that  false  and  remorseless  logic — false  because 
inhuman  —  which  would  deliver  over  children  to 
the  taskmaster,  secure  that  mere  considerations  of 
the  taskmaster's  interest  would  sufficiently  protect 
them. 


CHAPTEE  VI. 
LYBIC    PENGILLINGS. 

WITH  a  sense  of  relief,  however,  we  turn  from 
these  melancholy  strains  to  such  bright  poetic 
pencillings  as  A  Child  Asleep,  The  Sea-Mew,  and  To 
Flush,  My  Dog.  In  all  of  these  there  is  an  undertone 
of  pathos,  but  no  more  than  suffices  to  give  tone  and 
modulation  to  their  delicate  mirthfulness.  The 
sleeping  child  is  a  subject  that  has  often  been 
attempted  both  in  sculpture  and  in  painting.  No 
hand  has  touched  it  with  more  tender  felicity  than 
Mrs.  Browning's. 

How  he  sleepeth  ;  having  drunken 

Weary  childhood's  mandragore ! 

From  his  pretty  eyes  have  sunken 

Pleasures  to  make  room  for  more — 
Sleeping  near  the  wither'd  nosegay  which  he  pulled  the  day  before. 

Nosegays !  leave  them  for  the  waking  : 
Throw  them  earthward  where  they  grew. 

Dim  are  such  beside  the  breaking 

Amaranths  he  looks  unto — 
Folded  eyes  see  brighter  colours  than  the  open  ever  do. 

Heaven-flowers,  rayed  by  shadows  golden 

From  the  palms  they  sprang  beneath, 
Now  perhaps  divinely  holden, 

Swing  against  him  in  a  wreath — 

We  may  think  so  from  the  quickening  of  his  bloom  and  of  his 
breath. 


56  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

The  light  and  joyful  spirit  of  the  verses  seems  to 
be  associated  rather  with  fancy  than  with  earnest 
imagination,  but  fancy  attains  to  something  of 
solemnity  and  sacredness  when  it  takes  such  flights  as 
we  have  in  the  two  verses  that  follow. 

Softly,  softly !  make  no  noises ! 

Now  he  lieth  dead  and  dumb — 
Now  he  hears  the  angels'  voices 
Folding  silence  in  the  room — 

Now  he  muses  deep  the  meaning  of  the  Heaven-words  as  they 
come. 

Speak  not !     He  is  consecrated — 

Breathe  no  breath  across  his  eyes. 
Lifted  up  and  separated 

On  the  hand  of  God  he  lies, 
In  a  sweetness  beyond  touching, — held  in  cloistral  sanctities. 

The  Sea-Mew  is  one  of  the  most  perfect  in  form  of 
Mrs.  Browning's  productions.  It  is  a  brief  ballad- 
lyric  narrating  how  the  young  sea-mew  lay  dreaming 
on  the  waves,  "  and  throbbing  to  the  throbbing  sea," 
how  he  was  carried  to  a  garden,  and  how  he  died 
there.  I  quote  three  of  the  verses. 

We  were  not  cruel,  yet  did  sunder 

His  white  wing  from  the  blue  waves  under, 

And  bound  it,  while  his  fearless  eyes 

Shone  up  to  ours  in  calm  surprise, 
As  deeming  us  some  ocean  wonder  ! 

We  bore  our  ocean  bird  unto 

A  grassy  place,  where  he  might  view 

The  flowers  that  curtsey  to  the  bees, 

The  waving  of  the  tall  green  trees, 
The  falling  of  the  silver  dew. 


Flush.  57 


But  flowers  of  earth  were  pale  to  him 
Who  had  seen  the  rainbow  fishes  swim  ; 
And  when  earth's  dew  around  him  lay, 
He  thought  of  ocean's  winged  spray, 
And  his  eye  waxed  sad  and  dim. 


With  the  human  touch  the  human  agony  passed 
upon  him,  and  looking  up  to  the  waveless  sky  of  blue 
he  died. 

Flush,  a  dog  presented  to  Mrs.  Browning  by  her 
friend,  Miss  Mitford,  was  her  faithful  attendant  in  the 
sick-room  during  a  long  illness.  It  belonged,  Mrs. 
Browning  tells  us  in  a  footnote,  to  a  beautiful  race  of 
dogs,  rendered  famous  by  Miss  Mitford  in  England 
and  America.  "  The  Flushes,"  she  adds,  "  have  their 
laurels  as  well  as  the  Caesars, — the  chief  difference  (at 
least  the  very  head  and  front  of  it)  consisting,  perhaps, 
in  the  bald  head  of  the  latter  under  the  crown."  The 
picture  of  her  own  Flush  places  the  dog  visibly 
before  us. 


Like  a  lady's  ringlets  brown, 
Flow  thy  silken  ears  adown 

Either  side  demurely 
Of  thy  silver-suited  breast, 
Shining  out  from  all  the  rest 

Of  thy  body  purely. 

Darkly  brown  thy  body  is, 
Till  the  sunshine  striking  this 

Alchemise  its  dulness, 
When  the  sleek  curls  manifold 
Flash  all  over  into  gold 

With  a  burnished  fulness. 


58  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

Underneath  my  stroking  hand, 
Startled  eyes  of  hazel  bland 

Kindling,  growing  larger, 
Up  thou  leapest  with  a  spring, 
Full  of  prank  and  curveting, 

Leaping  like  a  charger. 

Leap  !  thy  broad  tail  waves  a  light ; 
Leap !  thy  slender  feet  are  bright, 

Canopied  in  fringes. 
Leap — those  tasselled  ears  of  thine 
Flicker  strangely,  fair  and  fine, 

Down  their  golden  inches. 

These  are  admirably  graphic  lines, — worthy  of  being 
set  beside  those  in  which  Burns  commemorates  his 
"friend  and  comrade"  Luath.  But  the  climax  of 
interest,  beauty,  and  pathos  is  not  reached  until  the 
poet  describes  the  service  rendered  by  Flush  in  her 
sick-room. 

Other  dogs  may  be  thy  peers 

Haply  in  these  drooping  ears, 

And  this  glossy  fairness. 

But  of  thee  it  shall  be  said, 
This  dog  watched  beside  a  bed 

Day  and  night  unweary, — 
Watched  within  a  curtained  room, 
Where  no  sunbeam  brake  the  gloom 

Bound  the  sick  and  dreary. 

Other  dogs  in  thymy  dew 

Tracked  the  hares  and  followed  through 

Sunny  moor  or  meadow — 
This  dog  only  crept  and  crept 
Next  a  languid  cheek  that  slept, 

Sharing  in  the  shadow. 


Flush.  59 


And  this  dog  was  satisfied 

If  a  pale  thin  hand  would  glide 

Down  his  dew-laps  sloping, — 
Which  he  pushed  his  nose  within, 
After, — platforming  his  chin 

On  the  palm  left  open. 

Among  the  dogs  of  literature,  Flush  will  have  a 
place  of  honour  till  the  English  language  is  forgotten. 
In  the  long  illness  of  the  poet,  which  originated  in 
the  rupture  of  a  blood-vessel  in  her  lungs,  and  was 
brought  to  a  dangerous  crisis  at  Torquay  by  the 
drowning  of  her  favourite  brother,  whose  boat  was 
upset  before  her  eyes,  Flush  contributed  more  perhaps 
than  Plato  and  ^Eschylus,  whose  works  would  be  thrust 
beneath  the  pillow  to  escape  the  prying  glance  of  her 
physician,  to  cheer  her  spirits  and  restore  her  health. 


CHAPTEE  VII. 
LADY  GERALDINE'S  COURTSHIP. 

IF  Mrs.  Browning's  intelligent  readers  were  asked 
to  name  her  most  characteristic  poem,  they  would 
probably  fix  upon  Lady  Geraldine's  Courtship.  The 
choice  would  lie  between  that  and  The  Duchess  May. 
The  finest  wine  of  her  genius,  the  intensest  elixir  of 
her  poetic  sympathy,  the  very  essence  of  her  womanly 
pride,  and  not  less  of  her  womanly  ecstasy  of  self- 
surrendering  humility,  as  well  as  her  most  original 
imagery,  puissant  thought,  and  splendid  language,  are 
present  in  both  poems.  I  should  not,  for  my  own 
part,  undertake  to  say  which  of  the  two  is  the  more 
characteristic;  but  I  should  pronounce  it  impossible 
for  any  one  to  have  a  right  insight  into  these  two 
without  possessing  a  fairly  accurate  idea  of  the  dis- 
tinctive character  of  her  genius. 

Lady  Geraldine's  Courtship  belongs  to  the  same  class 
of  poems  as  Locksley  Hall.  It  is  a  story  of  love,  and 
its  love-story  is  delineated  in  connection  with  certain 

1  social  truths  or  doctrines  which  the  poet  intends  to 
teach.      Of  these   doctrines  little   is   expressly  said, 


Lady  Geraldine's  Courtship.  61 

but  it  is  nevertheless  from  the  bearing  of  the  poems 
upon  them  that  their  chief  significance  is  derived. 
Lady  Geraldine's  Courtship  and  Locksley  Hall  are 
profoundly  democratic  in  spirit.  They  belong  to  the 
period  when  the  atmosphere  of  our  island  was  still 
tingling  with  the  Eeform  Bill  agitation ;  when  the 
hope  and  aspiration  of  ardent  spirits  were  stirred  with 
visions  of  class  reconciled  to  class ;  of  high  and  low, 
rich  and  poor,  warming  towards  each  other  in  the 
glow  of  a  common  brotherhood;  of  all  distinctions 
being  effaced  except  those  between  honest  men  and 
knaves,  between  base  men  and  honourable.  "  Cursed," 
says  Tennyson  in  Locksley  Hall,  "  be  the  social  lies 
that  warp  us  from  the  living  truth ;  "  "  cursed  be  the 
gold  that  gilds  the  straitened  forehead  of  the  fool." 
Love,  asserting  its  God-given  power  and  right  to  make 
two  hearts  happy,  and  to  make  their  love,  united  in 
marriage,  a  fountain  of  home-happiness  for  many,  is 
in  that  poem  baffled  by  worldly  pride.  In  Lady 
Geraldine's  Courtship  the  same  doctrine  of  the  right 
divine  of  love  to  set  its  foot  on  the  neck  of  pride  is 
poetically  preached  in  Mrs.  Browning's  manner.  Let 
us  read,  to  begin  with,  her  sketch  of  the  personages 
who  are  the  sole  actors  in  the  tale,  no  other  persons 
being  so  much  as  named,  although  the  shadowy 
presence  of  some  others  is  indicated. 

There's  a  lady — an  Earl's  daughter, — she  is  proud  and  she  is  noble, 
And  she  treads  the  crimson  carpet,  and  she  breathes  the  per- 
fumed air, 

And  a  kingly  blood  sends  glances  up  her  princely  eye  to  trouble, 
And  the  shadow  of  a  monarch's  crown  is  softened  in  her  hair. 


62  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

She  has  halls  among  the  woodlands,  she  has  castles  by  the  breakers, 
She  has  farms  and  she  has  manors,  she  can  threaten  and  com- 
mand, 

And  the  palpitating  engines  snort  in  steam  across  her  acres, 
As  they  mark  upon  the  blasted  heaven  the  measure  of  the  land. 

There  are  none  of  England's  daughters  who  can  show  a  prouder 

presence  ; 

Upon  princely  suitors  praying  she  has  looked  in  her  disdain  : 
She  was  sprung  of  English  nobles,  I  was  born  of  English  peasants  ; 
What  was  I  that  I  should  love  her — save  for  competence  to 
pain? 

I  was  only  a  poor  poet,  made  for  singing  at  her  casement, 

As  the  finches  or  the  thrushes,  while  she  thought  of  other  things. 

Oh,  she  walked  so  high  above  me,  she  appeared  to  my  abasement, 
In  her  lovely  silken  murmur,  like  an  angel  clad  in  wings  ! 

These  words  purport  to  be  part  of  a  letter  addressed 
by  the  poet,  Bertram,  to  his  "friend  and  fellow- 
student."  He  proceeds  with  his  description  of  the 
lady,  and  at  last  names  her. 

Many  vassals  bow  before  her  as  her  carriage  sweeps  their  doorways ; 

She  has  blest  their  little  children, — as  a  priest  or  queen  were  she ! 
Far  too  tender,  or  too  cruel  far,  her  smile  upon  the  poor  was, 

For  I  thought  it  was  the  same  smile  which  she  used  to  smile 
on  me. 

She  has  voters  in  the  Commons,  she  has  lovers  in' the  palace — 
And  of  all  the  fair  Court-ladies,  few  hath  jewels  half  as  fine  : 

Oft  the  prince  has  named  her  beauty  'twixt  the  red  wine  and  the 

chalice : 
Oh,  and  what  was  Jto  love  her  ?  my  beloved,  my  Geraldine  ! 

Being  a  poet,  however,  he  "  could  not  choose  but 
love  her,"  since  poets  are  born  to  love  all  things  set 
above  them,  all  things  good  and  fair,  and  the  Muses 
are  nymphs  of  the  mountain,  not  of  the  valley.  As  a 
well-reputed  poet,  he  was  admitted  to  rich  men's 


Lady  Geraldine's  Courtship.  63 

tables,  but  even  the  courtesies  he  experienced  made 
him  feel  the  distance  that  separated  him  from  his 
patrons.  They  talked  of  their  moors,  whispering  now 
and  then  in  insolently  condescending  terms  of  their 
plebeian  guest. 

Quite  low-born !  self-educated!  somewhat  gifted  though  by  Nature, — 

And  we  make  a  point  of  asking  him, — of  being  very  kind  : 
You  may  speak,  he  does  not  hear  you ;  and,  besides,  he  writes  no 

satire, — 

All  these  serpents  kept  by  charmers  leave  their  natural  sting 
behind. 

The  scorn  of  these  worldlings  he  encountered  with 
equal  scorn,  and  might  have  repaid  it  in  glance  or 
word,  if  Lady  Geraldine  had  not  suddenly  stepped  into 
the  circle  and  invited  him  to  Wycombe  Hall,  her 
mansion  in  Sussex.  This  invitation  he  accepted. 
Results  followed. 

Oh,  the  blessed  woods  of  Sussex,  I  can  hear  them  still  around  me, 
With  their  leafy  tide  of  greenery  still  rippling  up  the  wind ! 

Oh,  the  cursed  woods  of  Sussex !  where  the  hunter's  arrow  found 

me, 
When  a  fair  face  and  a  tender  voice  had  made  me  mad  and  blind ! 

The  second  of  these  lines  is  exceedingly  fine; 
but,  on  the  whole,  they  recall  too  vividly  the 
change  that  passed  on  the  moorland  and  the 
shore — "  Oh,  the  dreary,  dreary  moorland !  Oh,  the 
barren,  barren  shore  !  " — when  Amy,  in  Locksley 
Hall,  became  unkind.  The  parallel  is  by  no  means 
exact,  yet  the  suggestion  of  Tennyson's  passage  is 
inevitable. 


64  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

A  few  stanzas  further  on,  we  meet  with  another 
Tennysonian  parallel.  Bertram  describes  Geraldine 
as  he  saw  her  when  first  her  beauty  compelled  him  to 
love. 

Thus,  her  foot  upon  the  new-mown  grass — bareheaded — with  the 
flowing 

Of  the  virginal  white  vesture  gathered  closely  to  her  throat, 
With  the  golden  ringlets  in  her  neck  just  quickened  by  her  going, 

And  appearing  to  breathe  sun  for  air  and  doubting  if  to  float, — 
With  a  branch  of  dewy  maple,  which  her  Tight  hand  held  above  her, 

And  which  trembled  a  green   shadow  in  betwixt  her  and  the 

skies, — 
As  she  turned  her  face  in  going,  thus,  she  drew  me  on  to  love  her, 

And  to  worship  the  divineness  of  the  smile  hid  in  her  eyes. 

The  lines  in  Tennyson,  of  which  these  remind  me, 
occur  in  The  Gardener's  Daughter. 

He  cried,  "  Look !  look  ! "     Before  he  ceased  I  turned, 
And,  ere  a  star  can  wink,  beheld  her  there. 
For  up  the  porch  there  grew  an  Eastern  rose, 
That,  flowering  high,  the  last  night's  gale  had  caught, 
And  blown  across  the  walk.     One  arm  aloft- 
Gowned  in  pure  white,  that  fitted  to  the  shape — 
Holding  the  bush,  to  fix  it  back,  she  stood. 
A  single  stream  of  all  her  soft  brown  hair 
Pour'd  on  one  side  :  the  shadow  of  the  flowers 
Stole  all  the  golden  gloss,  and,  wavering 
Lovingly  lower,  trembled  on  her  waist — 
Ah,  happy  shade — and  still  went  wavering  down, 
But,  ere  it  touched  a  foot  that  might  have  danced 
The  green  sward  into  greener  circles,  dipt, 
And  mixed  with  shadows  of  the  common  ground  ! 
But  the  full  day  dwelt  on  her  brows,  and  sunn'd 
Her  violet  eyes,  and  all  her  Hebe  bloom,   ' 
And  doubled  his  own  warmth  against  her  lips, 
And  on  the  bounteous  wave  of  such  a  breast 
As  never  pencil  drew.     Half  light,  half  shade, 
She  stood,  a  sight  to  make  an  old  man  young. 


Symbol  and  Substance.  65 

Is  it  a  mere  trick  of  the  associative  faculty  which 
connects  these  two  passages — Mrs.  Browning's  and 
Tennyson's?  I  should  not  allege  that  Mrs.  Browning 
was  conscious  of  imitating;  and  the  passages  might 
be  cited  to  illustrate  the  difference  in  the  literary 
execution  of  the  two  poets  :  Tennyson  minute,  patient, 
copious  in  detail,  laying  on  touch  after  touch  with 
the  calmness  of  a  painter  in  his  studio,  Mrs.  Brown- 
ing giving  comparatively  few  touches,  and  throwing 
these  upon  the  canvas  with  impetuous,  hurrying 
speed.  Nevertheless,  the  decisive  feature  in  both 
descriptions  is  the  branch  held  in  the  hand  of  the 
lady ;  and  I  cannot  help  thinking  that,  whether  Mrs. 
Browning  knew  it  or  not,  the  maple  branch  was  held 
aloft  by  Geraldine,  because  the  rose  branch  had  been 
held  aloft  by  Alice. 

Lady  Geraldine  frequently  favoured  Bertram  with 
her  conversation,  and  their  talk  was  apt  to  turn  on 
high  themes,  such  as  the  relation  of  "symbols"  to  their 
"essential  meaning."  They  were  evidently  disposed 
to  agree  with  the  author  of  Sartor  Eesartus,  that  the 
truth  embodied  in  symbols  by  the  men  of  old  has  in 
our  time  outgrown,  in  various  instances,  the  embody- 
ing sign.  Bertram,  a  poet  of  Eadical  tendencies, 
thinks  that  we  have  too  much  symbol, — more  of 
symbol  than  of  substance.  Geraldine  admits  that, 
wherever  you  go  in  these  British  Islands,  you  find 
names  for  things,  shows  for  actions,  money  pass- 
ing itself  off  for  human  worth  ;  but  she  will  not  grant  , 
that  all  has,  as  yet,  "  run  to  symbol."  Were  that  the 

5 


66  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

case,  the  world  would  be  a  book  not  worth  reading, 
which  she  would  toss  aside.  Talk  like  this,  more  in- 
structive than  exhilarating,  was  diversified  by  lighter 
entertainment. 

Sometimes  on  the  hillside,  while  we  sate  down  in  the  gowans, 
With  the  forest  green  behind  us,  and  its  shadow  cast  before, 

And  the  river  running  under,  and  across  it  from  the  rowans 

A  brown  partridge  whirring  near  us  till  we  felt  the  air  it  bore, — 

There,  obedient  to  her  praying,  did  I  read  aloud  the  poems 

Made  to  Tuscan  flutes,  or  instruments  more  various  of  our  own ; 

Bead  the  pastoral  parts  of  Spenser — or  the  subtle  interflowings 
Found  in  Petrarch's  sonnets — here's  the  book — the  leaf  is  folded 
down ! 

Or  at  times  a  modern  volume, — Wordsworth's  solemn-thoughted 

idyl, 

Hewitt's  ballad-verse,  or  Tennyson's  enchanted  reverie, — 
Or  from  Browning  some  "  Pomegranate,"  which,  if  cut  deep  down 

the  middle, 
Shows  a  heart  within  blood-tinctured,  of  a  veined  humanity  ! 

He  describes  her  talk,  which  was  gravely  gay  and 
sportively  earnest,  the  root  striking  deep  into  sense 
and  meaning,  as  if  "to  justify  the  foliage  and  the 
waving  flowers  above."  She  was  inclined  to  agree 
with  Bertram  that  we  people  of  the  nineteenth 
century,  with  our  science  and  our  engines,  think 
too  much  of  ourselves,  and  fancy  that  we  are  more 
in  advance  of  our  fathers  than  may  really  be  the  case. 
Four  noble  stanzas  occur  here,  noble  at  once  in 
thought  and  imagination,  on  which  a  long  essay 
might  be  written  without  exhausting  their  wealth  of 
suggestion. 


The  Age.  67 


And  her  custom  was  to  praise  me  when  I  said, — The  age  culls 

simples, 
With  a  broad  clown's  back  turned  broadly  to  the  glory  of  the 

stars. 
We  are  gods  by  our  own  reck'ning,  and  may  well  shut  up   the 

temples, 
And  wield  on,  amid  the  incense-steam,  the  thunder  of  our  cars. 

For  we  throw  out  acclamations  of  self-thanking,  self-admiring, 
With,  at  every  mile  run  faster,  "  O  the  wondrous,  wondrous  age  !  " 

Little  thinking  if  we  work  our  SOULS  as  nobly  as  our  iron, 
Or  if  angels  will  commend  us  at  the  goal  of  pilgrimage. 

Why,  what  is  this  patient  entrance  into  Nature's  deep  resources, 
But  the  child's  most  gradual  learning  to  walk  upright  without 

bane  ? 
When  we  drive  out,  from  the  cloud  of  steam,   majestical  white 

horses, 

Are  we  greater  than  the  first  men  who  led  black  ones  by  the 
mane  ? 

If  we  trod  the  deeps  of  ocean,  if  we  struck  the  stars  in  rising, 
If  we  wrapped  the  globe  intensely  with  one  hot  electric  breath, 

'Twere  but  power  within  our   tether — no  new  spirit-power  com- 
prising— 
And  in  life  we  were  not  greater  men,  nor  bolder  men  in  death. 

A  grand  thought,  and  as  true  as  it  is  grand !  The 
scientific  achievement  of  our  time,  magnificent  as  it 
has  been  in  its  own  field,  must,  if  it  is  to  be  of  the 
highest  value,  be  but  a  prelude  to  those  spiritual 
searchings  which  alone  are  distinctive  of  mankind. 
In  the  cultivation  of  those  physical  sciences  whose 
aim  and  end  is  to  increase  the  convenience  of  life, — to 
supply  the  wants  of  the  body  and  exercise  the  faculties 
of  the  brain, — we  do  nothing  different  in  kind,  though 
of  course  immensely  different  in  degree,  from  what  the 
chaffinch  does  in  building  its  nest.  Our  "tether  "  is 

5—2 


68  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

longer  than  the  chaffinch's,  but  if  we  know  nothing 
except  what  physical  science  reveals  to  us,  we  have  no 
"  spirit-power,"  and  are  no  nearer  the  Eternal  and  the 
Divine.     Mrs.  Browning  clearly  agrees  with  Tenny- 
son that  physical   science,  be  its  contributions  to  our 
bodily  service  what  they  may,  cannot  satisfy  the  spirit 
of  man ;  and  the  experience  of  our  age,  which,  with 
all  its  engines  and  all  its  luxuries,  speaking  across 
oceans    and    piercing    mountains,    is    infinitely  sad, 
appears  to  confirm  this  view  of  the  case.     Atheism 
now   loudly  proclaims  itself  a   doctrine   of   despair. 
Shelley's  dawn-dream  of  a  happy  earth,  the  "reality 
of  heaven,"  has  been   succeeded  by  the   clamorous 
anguish  that  announces  our  world  as  the  reality  of  hell. 
Bertram  loved  Geraldine,  but  did  not  permit  himself 
to  believe  that  he  did  so  with  any  "  idiot  hope  "  of  ever 
possessing  her.     The  stag,  however,  vainly  tries  to  go 
on  grazing  with  a  great  gun- wound  in  his  throat.     It 
"reels  with  sudden  moan."     So  did  Bertram.     What 
brought  matters  to  a  crisis  was  that   he   happened, 
being  forced  to  it   by   circumstances,  to   overhear   a 
haughty  nobleman  make  a  proposal  of  marriage  to  the 
lady.     She  receives  the  suitor  with  coldness,  but,  in 
repelling  him,  says  something  which  stings   Bertram 
to  madness.  He  whom  she  marries  shall,  she  declares, 
be  noble  and  rich,  and  she  will  "  never  blush  to  think 
how  he  was  born."     In  other  words,  interprets  the 
agitated  Bertram,  she  will  marry  no  plebeian,  she  can 
respect  only  rank  and  wealth,  and  as  I  have  neither 
purse  nor  pedigree,  she  scorns  to  look  at  me.    "  Mad  " 


Bertram  and  Geraldine.  69 

or  "inspired"  by  this  persuasion  —  he  gives  us  leave 
to  choose  which  of  these  epithets  we  think  most 
appropriate  to  his  state  of  mind,  and  I  unhesitatingly 
choose  the  former  —  he  dashed  into  the  lady's  pre- 
sence and  made  a  few  observations.  In  the  course  of 
these,  he  "plucked  up  her  social  fictions  "  and  "  trod 
them  down  with  words  of  shaming."  A  sample  of 
what  he  said  is  included  in  the  letter  to  his  friend 
and  fellow-student. 

"  For  myself  I  do  not  argue,"  said  I,  "  though  I  love  you,  madam, 
But  for  better  souls  that  nearer  to  the  height   of  yours  have 
trod— 

And  this  age  shows,  to  my  thinking,  still  more  infidels  to  Adam, 
Than  directly,  by  profession,  simple  infidels  to  God. 

"  Learn  more  reverence,   madam,  not  for  rank  or  wealth  —  that 

needs  no  learning  ! 
That  comes  quickly  —  quick  as  sin  does  !  ay,  and  culminates  in 

sin  ; 
But  for  Adam's  seed,  MAN  !     Trust  me,  'tis  a  clay  above  your 

scorning, 

With  God's  image  stamped  upon  it,  and  God's  kindly  breath 
within. 

"  Have  you  any  answer,  madam?     Irmy  spirit  were  less  earthy  — 
If  its  instrument  were  gifted  with  a  better  silver  string  — 

I  would  kneel  down  where  I  stand,  and  say  —  Behold  me  !  I  am 

worthy 
Of  thy  loving,  for  I  love  thee  !  I  am  worthy  as  a  king. 

"As  it  is  your  ermined  pride,  I  swear,  shall  feel  this  stain  upon 

her, 
That  I,  poor,  weak,  tost  with  passion,  scorned  by  me  and  you 

again, 
Love  you,  madam  —  dare  to  love  you  —  to  my  grief  and  your  dis- 

honour — 
To  my  endless  desolation,  and  your  impotent  disdain  !  " 


,1  UNIVERSITY 


70  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

At  last  he  stopped.  She  looked  up,  with  wonder 
and  tears  in  her  eyes,  and  said  only  "  Bertram !  " 
Thereupon  he  fainted,  and  when  he  came  to  himself 
he  was  in  his  own  room,  and  sought  relief  to  his 
feelings  by  expressing  them  in  the  letter  into  which 
we  have  been  looking.  That  finished,  Mrs.  Browning 
herself  takes  up  the  tale. 

As  Bertram  leant  backward  in  his  chair,  his  lips 
still  quivering  with  love  and  grief,  he  became  aware 
of  a  vision  of  a  lady,  first  standing  silent  between 
the  purple  lattice-curtains,  then  gradually  approaching 
him.  The  form,  the  features,  the  eye,  the  brow,  the 
lip  were  Geraldine's,  but  he  could  not  believe  that 
they  were  corporeal. 

Said  he — "Wake  me  by  no  gesture, — sound  of  breath  or  stir  of 

gesture ; 

Let  the  blessed  apparition  melt  not  yet  to  its  divine  ! 
No  approaching — hush !  no  breathing !  or  my  heart  must  swoon  to 

death  in 
The  too  utter  life  thou  bringest — 0  thou  dream  of  Geraldine ! " 

Ever,  evermore  the  while  in  a  slow  silence  she  kept  smiling — 
But  the  tears  ran  over  lightly  from  her  eyes,  and  tenderly  ; 

"  Dost  thou,  Bertram,  truly  love  me  ?     Is  no  woman  far  above  me 
Found  more  worthy  of  thy  poet-heart  than  such  a  one  as  I?  " 

*•*-;*#'•*•» 

Softened,  quickened  to  adore  her,  on  his  knees  he  fell  before  her, 
And  she  whispered  low  in  triumph — "It  shall  be  as  I  have 
sworn! 

Very  rich  he  is  in  virtues, — very  noble, — noble,  certes ; 
And  I  shall  not  blush  in  knowing  that  men  call  him  lowly  born." 

These  lovers  were  presumably  married,  and  we  are 
free  to   suppose  that   they  lived  happily  ever   after; 


A  Poetical  Marriage.  71 

but,  if  they  did,  Bertram  must  have  been  a  very  true 
poet  indeed,  and  Lady  Geraldine  an  uncommonly  sen- 
sible woman.  The  piece,  however,  is  not  to  be  tried 
by  prosaic  rules.  It  is  poetry,  and  not  prose.  You  do 
not  expect  the  cloud-flocks  of  the  West  Wind,  that 
look  so  beautiful  on  the  blue  fields  of  the  sky,  to  yield 
you  woollen  coats  and  saddle  of  mutton.  Lady 
Geraldine' s  Courtship  is  steeped  in  melody, — the 
language,  the  imagery,  the  sentiment,  the  thought, 
all  instinct  with  music,  floating  and  flowing  and 
rippling  along  in  an  element  of  liquid  harmony  and 
modulated  brilliance. 


CHAPTEE  VIII. 
THE  RHYME  OF  THE  DUCHESS  MAY. 

WHILE  declining  to  adjudicate  between  master- 
pieces, I  confess  that  the  poem  which  most 
closely  connects  itself  with  Mrs.  Browning  in  my 
own  mind — the  poem  on  which  my  imagination 
dwells  most  wonderingly,  and  to  which  my  heart 
clings  most  fondly — is  The  Rhyme  of  the  Duchess 
May.  Its  blemishes  are  mere  motes  in  the  sunlight 
of  its  general  power.  Its  artistic  unity  and  com- 
pleteness are  not  less  remarkable  than  its  strong 
drawing  and  vivid  local  colour.  In  this,  as  in  other 
instances,  the  critic  of  Mrs.  Browning  is  called  to  dis- 
criminate between  two  things  :  the  realistic  basis,  and 
the  imaginative  form.  No  poet  deals  more  realistically 
with  passion  than  Mrs.  Browning, — she  feels  and  gives 
its  living  throb  with  the  penetrating  vehemence,  the 
fiery  tenderness  of  Burns  ;  but  the  imaginative  drapery 
in  which  she  clothes  her  conceptions  is  apt  to  be  loose- 
flowing  and  gorgeous  as  mist  kindled  by  lightnings  and 
rent  by  storms.  In  the  Duchess  May  the  passion  of 
wifely  devotion  is  shown  in  its  intensest  yet  most  real 


The  Duchess  May.  73 

fervour,  triumphing  in  death,  triumphing  over  death ; 
but  the  imaginative  form  and  covering  in  which  this 
central  passion  is  wrapped  may  be  held  to  be  some- 
what wildly  romantic. 

The  poem  opens  with  the  description  of  a  country 
churchyard,  in  which  the  bell  tolls  slowly  for  the  dead. 
Six  willow  trees  grow  on  its  north  side,  their  shadows, 
as  they  rock  solemnly  in  the  wind,  slanting  across  the 
graves.  On  the  south  and  the  west  runs  a  small  river, 
and  through  the  willow  branches  you  see  hills,  whence 
the  river  comes  out  of  the  distance.  The  poet  sits  amid 
the  stillness  of  the  graves,  broken  only  by  the  knelling 
of  the  death-bell  and  the  low  voices  of  tree  and  river, 
and  reads  the  "  ancient  rhyme,"  the  "  tale  of  life  and 
sin,"  which  follows.  The  effect  of  the  tolling  of  the 
bell  is  aimed  at  by  iteration,  in  each  triplet,  of  the 
words, "  Toll  slowly." 

We  are  at  once  hurried  into  the  main  current  of 
interest.  The  Castle  of  Linteged  rises  suddenly  before 
us,  built  from  nothing  by  the  wand  of  the  poetical 
magician. 

Down  the  sun  dropt  large  and  red,  on  the  towers  of  Linteged, — 

Toll  slowly. 
Lance  and  spear  upon  the  height,  bristling  strange  in  fiery  light, 

While  the  castle  stood  in  shade. 
There  the  castle  stood  up  black,  with  the  red  sun  at  its  back, — 

ToU  slowly. 
Like  a  sullen  smouldering  pyre,  with  a  top  that  flickers  fire, 

When  the  wind  is  on  its  track. 

That  crimson  background,  with  the  tower  cut  out 
black  against  it,  gives  tone  to  the  whole  picture  about 


74  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

to  be  unfolded.  Not  the  pencil  of  Tintoret,  not  the 
pen  of  Dante,  ever  struck  a  truer  note  of  imaginative 
harmony. 

The  Duchess  May  was  the  ward  of  her  uncle,  the 
old  Earl  of  Leigh,  who  betrothed  her  in  her  childhood, 
for  the  sake  of  her  gold,  to  his  son,  Lord  Leigh.  On 
coming  of  age  she  disliked  the  young  lord,  haughtily 
defied  both  him  and  his  father,  and  bestowed  her  hand 
upon  Sir  Guy  of  Linteged.  After  the  marriage  the 
bridal  train,  pursued  by  the  Leighs,  rode  off  at  mid- 
night, through  storm  and  rain,  for  the  Castle  of 
Linteged. 

And  the  bridegroom  led  the  flight  on  his  red-roan  steed  of  might, — 

Toll  slowly. 
And  the  bride  lay  on  his  arm,  still,  as  if  she  felt  no  harm, 

Smiling  out  into  the  night. 

These  lines  suggest  the  contrast  of  passion  which, 
in  its  essential  unity,  delineates  and  defines  the 
personality  of  the  lady :  defiance  of  kindred,  scorn  of 
all  terrors  of  midnight  and  storm,  dauntless  courage 
and  inflexible  pride,  where  love  is  to  be  fought  for 
and  vindicated — perfect  rest,  submission,  confidence, 
halcyon  repose,  as  of  a  sea-bird  on  its  native  wave,  as 
of  a  child  on  the  breast  of  its  mother,  in  the  encircling 
arms  of  love  accepted  and  returned. 

Sir  Guy  and  his  wife  reach  the  castle  in  safety,  and 
for  three  months  the  very  elixir  of  happiness  is  theirs. 
Then  Lord  Leigh — the  rejected  suitor — advances  with 
an  overpowering  force,  and,  after  a  fortnight's  siege, 
the  castle  is  about  to  fall  into  his  hands.  Sordid  and 


The  Duchess  May.  75 

implacable,  he  will  wed  his  betrothed,  whether  she 
loves  him  or  hates  him,  and  though  he  must  reach  her 
across  the  corpse  of  her  present  husband.  In  this  she 
is  resolved,  through  life  and  death,  to  foil  him.  Attired 
in  purple  robes,  her  ducal  coronet  on  her  brow,  she 
looks  down  upon  him  from  the  wall,  smiting  him  with 
her  scorn. 

Meanwhile  Sir  Guy  has  been  superintending  opera- 
tions in  the  east  tower,  the  highest  of  all.  He  sees 
that  there  is  no  hope,  and,  bethinking  him  that  he 
alone  stands  between  his  wife  and  followers  and  safety, 
determines  to  put  an  end  to  his  life.  The  Duchess 
May,  he  is  content  to  think,  though  loving  him  truly, 
will  get  over  her  distress,  soothed  and  well-entreated 
by  his  victorious  foes,  and  will  make  shift  with  Lord 
Leigh  after  all.  Is  she  not  a  woman  ? 

She  will  weep  her  woman's  tears,   she  will  pray  her  woman's 
prayers,— 

Toll  slowly; 
But  her  heart  is  young  in  pain,  and  her  hopes  will  spring  again 

By  the  sun  time  of  her  years. 

He  binds  his  men  by  oath  not  to  strike  a  blow  that 
night.  He  then  demands  of  his  two  faithfullest  knights 
that,  as  a  last  service,  they  will  lead  the  good  steed, 
ridden  by  him  in  that  unforgotten  night-journey,  up 
the  turret-stair  to  the  top  of  the  east  tower.  His  pur- 
pose is  to  mount  the  horse,  make  it  leap  from  the  wall, 
and  thus  to  die  on  his  war-steed.  But  the  Duchess  May 
has  a  heart  as  strong  and  proud  as  his.  She  will  show 
her  husband  what  lightnings  may  lurk  amid  the  soft- 


76  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

ness  of  a  woman's  tears.  As  the  knights  are  goading 
the  horse  up  the  stair,  she  comes  from  her  chamber 
and  inquires  into  their  errand.  They  tell  her  that,  in 
an  hour,  the  breach  will  be  complete,  and  that  her 
lord,  wild  with  despair,  is  about  to  leap  from  the 
castle-wall.  For  a  moment  the  sweetness  of  love  past 
and  the  bitterness  of  present  anguish  overcome  her :  she 
bows  her  head,  and  tear  after  tear  is  heard  falling  on  the 
ground.  The  knights,  good-hearted  but  not  gentle  with 
the  gentleness  of  chivalry,  rudely  assay  to  comfort  her. 

Get  thee  in,  thou  soft  ladye  ! — here  is  never  a  place  for  thee  ! 

ToU  slowly. 
Braid  thy  hair  and  clasp  thy  gown,  that  thy  beauty  in  its  moan 

May  find  grace  with  Leigh  of  Leigh. 

But  her  tears  have  fallen.     She  is   herself  again. 
Love's  pride  has  set  its  iron  heel  on  love's  tenderness. 

She  stood  up  in  bitter  case,  with  a  pale  yet  steady  face, 

Toll  slowly, 

Like  a  statue  thunderstruck,  which,  though  quivering,  seemed  to 
look 

Eight  against  the  thunder-place. 

She  takes  from  the  knights  the  rein  of  the  horse. 
He  now  needs  no  goading. 

Soft  he  neighed  to  answer  her,  and  then  followed  up  the  stair, 

For  the  love  of  her  sweet  look. 

On  the  east  tower,  high'st  of  all— there  where  never  a  hoof  did 
fall,— 

Toll  slowly, 
Out  they  swept,  a  vision  steady, — noble  steed  and  lovely  lady, 

Calm  as  if  in  bower  or  stall. 

The  wife  has  said  in  her  heart  that,  if  her  husband 
leaps  from  the  castle-wall,  she  will  leap   also.      He 


The  Leap.  77 


endeavours,  with,  frantic  earnestness,  to  urge  the  horse 
over  alone,  but  she  will  not  quit  her  hold,  and  entreats 
him  to  take  her  with  him.  The  breach  falls  in  as  she 
pleads,  and  the  crash  of  wall  and  window,  the  shouts 
of  foemen  and  the  shrieks  of  the  dying,  rise  in  one  roar 
around  the  pair.  Then  love  prevails.  In  vain  does 
Sir  Guy  wrench  her  small  hands  twice  and  thrice  in 
twain.  She  clings  to  him  as  in  a  swoon  of  agonised 
determination.  At  last,  when  the  horse,  rearing  on 
the  edge  of  the  precipitous  battlement,  could  no  longer 
be  stopped,  "  she  upsprang,  she  rose  upright,"  she 
took  her  seat  beside  her  husband. 

And  her  head  was  on  his  breast,  where  she  smiled  as  one  at  rest, — 

Toll  slowly. 

"  Ring, "    she   cried,    "  O  vesper  bell,   in    the    beechwood's    old 
chapelle ! — 

But  the  passing  bell  rings  best." 

They  have  caught  out  at  the  rein,  which  Sir  Guy  threw  loose — in 
vain, — 

Toll  slowly. 
For  the  horse  in  stark  despair,  with  his  front  hoofs  poised  in  air, — 

On  the  last  verge  rears  amain. 
Now  he  hangs  the  rocks  between— and  his  nostrils  curdle  in, — 

Toll  slowly, 
Now  he  shivers  head  and  hoof — and  the  flakes  of  foam  fall  off ; 

And  his  face  grows  fierce  and  thin ! 
And  a  look  of  human  woe  from  his  staring  eyes  did  go, — 

Toll  slowly ; 
And  a  sharp  cry  uttered  he,  in  a  foretold  agony 

Of  the  headlong  death  below. 

And,  "Ring,  ring,  thou  passing  bell,"  still  she  cried,  "i'  the  old 
chapelle." 

Toll  slowly. 

Then  back-toppling,  crashing  back, — a  dead-weight  flung  out  to 
wrack, — 

Horse  and  riders  overfell. 


78  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

No  sterner  realism  than  we  have  in  this  description 
is  possible.  The  horse  is  frightfully,  yet  literally,  true 
to  life.  Mrs.  Browning  once  more  proves  that  it  is 
on  the  rugged  crags  of  reality  that  imagination  preens 
her  wings  for  flight  into  the  ideal.  The  human  passion 
described  is  also,  doubt  it  not,  true  to  fact :  Mrs. 
Browning's  heart  sympathetically  thrilled  with  it,  as 
she  lit  that  smile  on  the  face  of  the  bride,  sinking  into 
the  abyss  of  death  in  her  husband's  arms  :  with  all 
her  gentleness,  Mrs.  Browning  could  have  smiled  that 
smile,  and  leaped  from  that  wall !  Woman's  love  can 
make  of  the  chariot  of  death  a  car  of  victory ;  amid 
the  flames  of  the  funeral  pyre  it  can  find  the  softest 
bed. 

The  Duchess  May  is  one  of  the  most  admirably 
drawn  figures  that  ever  came  from  the  pencil  of  art. 
Every  line  is  so  definite,  yet  so  delicate  in  its  curva- 
ture ;  every  tint  so  clear  and  warm,  yet  so  soft  in  its 
blending,  so  fine  in  its  gradation.  Her  external 
attributes — her  haughtiness,  her  beauty,  her  queen- 
liness  of  mien  and  manner, — are  touched  in  with  the 
airy  vividness  of  Scott :  her  inmost  heart  is  laid 
bare, — her  womanly  tenderness,  unfathomable  as  the 
blue  wells  of  the  sky,  her  womanly  pride,  her  womanly 
ecstasy  of  self-sacrifice, — with,  I  speak  deliberately, 
the  power  of  a  Shakespeare.  In  some  respects  she 
reminds  one  of  Scott's  Die  Vernon,  in  some  of 
Charlotte  Bronte's  Shirley.  Had  the  Duchess  May 
been  the  heroine  of  a  three- volume  novel,  Shirley 
might  indeed  have  played  her  part  indifferently  well, 


Peace  at  Last.  79 


though  some  additional  brightening,  and  softening, 
and  warming — some  tones  and  touches  from  Dorothea 
Brooke,  the  loveliest  of  all  George  Eliot's  female 
characters — would  have  been  required  even  by  Char- 
lotte Bronte's  glorious  Yorkshire  lass.  In  one  word, 
the  Duchess  May  must  be  ranked  with  the  Juliets  and 
Desdemonas,  beyond  any  flight  of  Walter  Scott  or 
Charlotte  Bronte,  and  perhaps  not  to  be  adequately 
portrayed  in  any  novel  or  drama  with  a  pleasant 
ending,  but  only  where  tragedy  in  sceptred  pall 
sweeps  by. 

The  wild  ancient  Rhyme  having  sung  itself  out,  we 
return  to  the  calm  of  the  churchyard,  and  are  re- 
minded of  a  serenity  enveloping  and  subduing  all 
passion.  The  poet  fixes  her  eye  on  a  little  grave 
beneath  a  willow  tree,  on  which  is  engraved  an  in- 
scription stating  that  it  is  the  grave  of  a  child  of 
three  years.  She  draws,  with  rapid,  vivid,  graphic 
touches, — suggesting  rather  than  detailing, — a  con- 
trast between  the  passage  of  the  child-soul  to  heaven, 
encompassed  by  star- wheels  and  angel  wings,  and 
the  passionate  dashing  up  of  those  frantic  lovers 
against  the  thick-bossed  shield  of  God's  judgment. 

Now,  your  will  is  all  unwilled — now,  your  pulses  are  all  stilled, — 

Toll  slowly. 
Now,  ye  lie  as  meek  and  mild  (whereso  laid)  as  Maud  the  child, 

Whose  small  grave  was  lately  filled. 
Beating  heart  and  burning  brow,  ye  are  very  patient  now, — 

Toll  slowly. 

And  the  children  might  be  bold  to  pluck  the  king-cups  from  your 
mould, 

Ere  a  month  had  let  them  grow. 


80  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

And  so  the  poem  ends  in  rest.  The  Rhyme,  with 
its  passion  and  its  change,  comes  between  the  stillness 
before  and  after,  like  a  meteor  between  two  calm 
celestial  spaces,  leaving  us  in  silent  wonder  at  its 
artistic  symmetry,  its  flawless  unity,  gazing  up  into 
the  heavenly  blue  which  overarches  its  volcanic 
fires. 


\ 


CHAPTEE  IX. 

POEMS  OF  AFFECTION. 

AMONG  rough-and-ready  tests  of  greatness  there 
is  none,  I  think,  more  practically  useful  and 
trustworthy  than  that  of  width  of  range.  The  poet 
who  has  but  one  tune — one  niood  of  feeling — one  line 
of  thought — one  kind  of  imagery — one  type  of  cha- 
racter— even  though  excellent  within  his  restricted 
field,  will  hardly  be  pronounced  a  supreme  singer. 
The  uniformity  of  Dante's  temper — ever  intense,  ever 
austere — detracts  from  his  greatness,  and  is  perhaps 
the  chief  reason  why,  though  unsurpassed  in  particular 
delineation  or  in  sheer  imaginative  might,  he  is 
admittedly  a  less  poet  than  Homer  or  Shakespeare. 
We  have  seen  that  Mrs.  Browning  embraces  in  her 
poetic  range  at  least  two  well-marked  and  diverse 
moods  of  thought  and  sympathy.  She  is  passionately 
addicted  to  romance,  and  loves  the  pageantry  of  fancy 
and  imagination ;  yet  her  tenderness,  her  capacity 
of  interpreting,  in  fine  sympathetic  music,  the  simplest  * 
joys  of  the  heart  and  the  home,  is  as  notable  as  her . 

6 


82  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

delight  in  those  visions  of  the  imagination  in  which 
romance  verges  on  extravagance.  By  the  tenderness 
of  her  genius  she  infused  into  the  tale  of  Adam  and 
Eve,  and  their  expulsion  from  the  Garden,  a  human 
interest  that  penetrates  the  heart  far  more  thrillingly 
than  the  stately  strain  of  Milton  ;  and,  in  her  shorter 
poems,  we  perpetually  come  upon  lines  and  stanzas 
imhued  with  that  domestic  sentiment,  that  home-bred 
feeling,  at  which  some  sneer,  but  of  which  others  are 
justly  proud,  as  a  characteristic  of  English  society. 
It  is  in  the  pure  sincerity  of  her  heart  that  she  asks, — 

What  music  certes  can  you  find 
As  soft  as  voices  which  are  kind  ? 

In  the  simply  beautiful  verses  on  the  coronation  and 
the  wedding  of  Queen  Victoria,  she  thus  lays  her 
poetical  charge  upon  the  bridegroom  : 

And  since,  Prince  Albert,  men  have  called  thy  spirit  high  and  rare, 
And  true  to  truth  and  brave  for  truth  as  some  at  Augsburg  were, — 
We  charge  thee  by  thy  lofty  thoughts,  and  by  thy  poet-mind 
Which  not  by  glory  and  degree  takes  measure  of  mankind, 
Esteem  that  wedded  hand  less  dear  for  sceptre  than  for  ring, 
And  hold  her  uncrowned  womanhood  to  be  the  royal  thing. 

The  verses  on  Napoleon  are  fine  throughout,  breath- 
ing a  noble  spirit  of  patriotism,  which  refuses  to  find 
satisfaction  in  the  vengeance  taken  by  England  on  a 
fallen  foe ;  but  perhaps  their  finest  stanza  is  that  in 
which  the  poet,  though  sternly  declining  to  pronounce 
a  judgment  generally  favourable  to  Napoleon,  yet 
discerns  one  thing  that  entitles  him  to  honour. 


Poeni'S  of  Affection.  83 

I  do  not  praise  this  man  :  the  man  was  flawed 

For  Adam — much  more,  Christ ! — his  knee,  unbent — 

His  hand,  unclean — his  aspiration,  pent 

Within  a  sword-sweep — pshaw  ! — but  since  he  had 

The  genius  to  be  loved,  why,  let  him  have 

The  justice  to  be  honoured  in  his  grave. 

does  not  say  very  much — not  too  much,  at 
all  events — about  her  years  of  childhood ;  but  the 
glimpses  we  have  of  them  are  always  bright  and 
always  tender. 

Nine  green  years  had  scarcely  brought  me 

To  my  childhood's  haunted  spring  : 

I  had  life  like  flowers  and  bees 

In  betwixt  the  country  trees  ; 
And  the  sun  the  pleasure  taught  me 

Which  he  teacheth  everything. 

If  the  rain  fell,  there  was  sorrow ; — 

Little  head  leant  on  the  pane, 

Little  finger  drawing  down  it 

The  long  trailing  drops  upon  it, — 
And  the  "  Eain,  rain,  come  to-morrow," 

Said  for  charm  against  the  rain. 

Is  not  that  a  life-like  picture, — touched  in  with  the 
delicate  accuracy  of  those  wonderful  old  Dutchmen, 
the  Mierises,  Dows,  Maases,  and  yet  with  something 
in  it  that  reminds  us  of  the  sentiment  of  Edouard 
Frere  ?  Still  lovelier  is  the  following  : 

I  hear  the  birthday's  noisy  bliss, 

My  sisters'  woodland  glee, — 
My  father's  praise  I  did  not  miss, 
When  stooping  down  he  cared  to  kiss 

The  poet  at  his  knee. 

I  cannot  remember  any  passage  in  which   she  has. 

6—2 


84  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

spoken  of  her  childhood  except  in  terms  of  deep 
though  pensive  joyfulness  ;  and  the  opening  lines  in 
A  Rhapsody  of  Life's  Progress  may  be  looked  upon  as 
an  authentic  summing-up  of  its  general  impressions. 

We  are  born  into  life — it  is  sweet,  it  is  strange  ! 
We  lie  still  on  the  knee  of  a  mild  mystery, 

Which  smiles  with  a  change  ! 

But  we  doubt  not  of  changes,  we  know  not  of  spaces, 
The  heavens  seem  as  near  as  our  own  mother's  face  is, 
And  we  think  wo  could  touch  all  the  stars  that  we  see. 

Nor  need  we  doubt  that  the  affections  formed  in  that 
early  time  retained  their  hold  on  her  heart  during  life,4 
and  that  it  is  her  own    feeling   towards  old  friends 
that   she   expresses  in  this  impassioned   stanza  from 
Confessions. 

The  least  touch  of  their  hands  in  the  morning,  I  keep  day  and 

night ; 

Their  least  step  on  the  stair  still  throbs  through  me,  if  ever  so  light ; 
Their  least  gift,  which  they  left  to  my  childhood  in  long  ago  years, 
Is  now  turned  from  a  toy  to  a  relic,  and  gazed  at  through  tears. 

The  Lines  on  Mrs.  Hemans,  those  on  L.  E.  L.'s  Last 
Question,  and  those  on  Cowper's  Grave,  may  be  referred 
to  as  further  illustrating  Mrs.  Browning's  tender- 
ness ;  but  of  these  minor  pieces,  in  none,  perhaps,  does 
she  attain  to  so  sweet  a  harmony  of  beauty  and  music 
as  in  that  entitled  The  Sleep.  In  this  poem — and 
the  remark  may  be  applied  to  these  smaller  pieces 
generally — the  mannerism,  which  undeniably  charac- 
terises her  larger  poems,  falls  almost  wholly  away, 
and  she  speaks  in  that  common  language  which,  if 


The  Sleep.  85 


only  the  poet  can  use  it,  lays  a  mightier  spell  upon  the 
heart  than  the  most  ingenious  and  surprising  artifice. 
The  poem  to  which  she  prefixes  those  infinitely  beau- 
tiful words  of  the  psalm,  "  He  giveth  His  beloved, 
sleep,"  may  be  regarded  as  a  hymn  or  paraphrase, 
founded  on  the  Scriptural  expression.  All  my  pre- 
vious quotations  from  Mrs.  Browning  have  been 
fragmentary,  and,  therefore,  necessarily  inadequate,  if 
not  unjust;  for  fragments  cannot  convey  a  just  idea 
of  the  unity  of  the  wholes  from  which  they  are  taken. 
For  this,  if  for  no  other  reason,  I  shall  quote  the 
poem  entire. 

Of  all  the  thoughts  of  God  that  are 
Borne  inward  unto  souls  afar, 

Along  the  Psalmist's  music  deep, 
Now  tell  me  if  that  any  is, 
For  gift  or  grace,  surpassing  this — 

"  He  giveth  His  beloved,  sleep  "  ? 

What  would  we  give  to  our  beloved  ? 
The  hero's  heart,  to  be  unmoved, 

The  poet's  star-tuned  harp,  to  sweep, 
The  patriot's  voice,  to  teach  and  rouse, 
The  monarch's  crown,  to  light  the  brows  ? — 

"He  giveth  His  beloved,  sleep." 

What  do  we  give  to  our  beloved  ? 
A  little  faith  all  undisproved, 

A  little  dust  to  overweep, 
And  bitter  memories  to  make 
The  whole  earth  blasted  for  our  sake. 

"  He  giveth  His  beloved,  sleep." 

"  Sleep  soft,  beloved  !  "  we  sometimes  say, 
But  have  no  tune  to  charm  away 

Sad  dreams  that  through  the  eyelids  creep  ; 


86  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 


But  never  doleful  dream  again 
Shall  break  the  happy  slumber  when 
*  He  giveth  His  beloved,  sleep." 

O  earth,  so  full  of  dreary  noises  ! 
0  men,  with  wailing  in  your  voices ! 
O  delved  gold,  the  wailers  heap  ! 

0  strife,  O  curse,  that  o'er  it  fall ! 
God  strikes  a  silence  through  you  all, 

And  "giveth  His  beloved,  sleep." 

His  dews  drop  mutely  on  the  hill, 
His  cloud  above  it  saileth  still, 

Though  on  its  slope  men  sow  and  reap. 
More  softly  than  the  dew  is  shed, 
Or  cloud  is  floated  overhead, 

"  He  giveth  His  beloved,  sleep." 

Yea,  men  may  wonder  when  they  scan 
A  living,  thinking,  feeling  man 

Confirmed  in  such  a  rest  to  keep, 
But  angels  say — and  through  the  word 

1  think  their  happy  smile  is  heard — 
"  He  giveth  His  beloved,  sleep." 

For  me,  my  heart  that  erst  did  go 
Most  like  a  tired  child  at  a  show, 

That  sees  through  tears  the  jugglers  leap, — 
Would  now  its  wearied  vision  close, 
Would  childlike  on  His  love  repose, 

Who  "giveth  His  beloved,  sleep." 

And,  friends,  dear  friends, — when  it  shall  be 
That  this  low  breath  is  gone  from  me, 

And  round  my  bier  ye  come  to  weep, 
Let  one,  most  loving  of  you  all, 
Say,  "  Not  a  tear  must  o'er  her  fall — 

He  giveth  His  beloved,  sleep." 


CHAPTEE  X. 
HER  LOVE  SONNETS. 

WE  saw  from  a  couple  of  lines  in  Lady 
Geraldine's  Courtship,  that  the  poetical  genius 
of  Robert  Browning  had  made  a  deep  impression  upon 
Elizabeth  Barrett  Barrett.  Whether  those  lines, 
which  must  have  been  gratifying  in  no  ordinary  degree 
to  a  young  man,  gave  occasion  to  the  acquaintance 
that  sprang  up  between  the  two  poets  I  cannot  tell ; 
but  all  the  world  knows  that  the  mysteriously  named 
Portuguese  Sonnets,  which  appear  at  the  end  of  the 
second  volume  of  Mrs.  Browning's  Poems  (edition  of 
1853),  have  for  their  subject  the  wooing  and  being 
wooed  of  those  distinguished  persons.  The  interest  of 
the  sonnets  is  enhanced  by  the  circumstance  that  Miss 
Barrett  passed  a  considerable  number  of  years  in  a 
sickroom,  and  that  the  courtship  was  carried  on  during 
her  period  of  convalescence.  They  are  characterised 
by  a  profound  sincerity,  which  may  possibly  have 
interfered  with  their  literary  elaboration,  and  their 
perfection  as  works  of  art ;  for  the  singer,  conscious 
that  she  was  not  only  dramatically,  but  actually  in 


88  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

love,  may  have  been  afraid  to  give  her  imagination 
wing  in  the  expression  of  her  rapture. 

In  the  first,  the  lover  is  represented  as  entering  the 
shadowed  room  of  the  invalid  while  she  muses  tear- 
fully on  the  darkness  that  has  been  cast  by  her  malady 
across  her  life.  She  is  aware  that  "  a  mystic  shape  " 
moves  behind  her,  and  draws  her  backward  by  the  hair. 
The  idea  is,  of  course,  taken  from  the  famous  passage 
in  the  Iliad,  in  which  Athene  takes  Achilles  gently,  yet 
overpoweringly,  by  his  yellow  hair.  The  sonnet  ends 
with  these  three  lines  : 

And  a  voice  said  in  mastery,  while  I  strove, 

"  Guess  now  who  holds  thee  ?  "     "  Death  !  "  I  said. 

But,  there 
The  silver  answer  rang,  "  Not  Death,  but  Love." 

She  is  far  from  sure,  however,  that  Love,  not  Death, 
will  bear  her  from  that  chamber.  In  the  next  sonnet 
she  tells  her  proposed  deliverer  that  God  may  have 
said  "Nay"  to  the  deliverance,  and  that  "Nay  is 
worse  from  God  than  from  all  others."  In  the  third 
she  sinks  to  a  lower  vein,  and  reflects  that  her  lover, 
exalted  by  his  reputation,  is  in  a  higher  social  position 
than  she. 

Thou,  bethink  thee,  art 
A  guest  for  queens  to  social  pageantries, 
With  gages  from  a  hundred  brighter  eyes 
Than  tears  even  can  make  mine,  to  ply  thy  part 
Of  chief  musician.     What  hast  tJiou  to  do 
With  looking  from  the  lattice-lights  at  me, 
A  poor,  tired,  wandering  singer  ? 

Continuing  in  this  mood,  she  tells  him,  in  plain 
terms,  that  she  cannot  smile  upon  him.  "  Stand 


Love  Sonnets.  89 


further  off,  then.  Go!"  She  reiterates  the  command 
in  another  sonnet ;  but  confesses  that  she  will  never 
again  be  as  she  was  before;  never  will  she  lift  her 
hand  so  serenely  in  the  sunshine  as  when  she  had  not 
yet  felt  the  touch  of  his  palm  upon  it.  Her  determi- 
nation, of  course,  does  not  prove  irrevocable.  We 
learn,  in  the  seventh  of  the  series,  that,  since  she  heard 
''the  footsteps"  of  her  lover's  "soul"  steal  between 
her  and  death,  she  has  been  "  caught  up  into  love  and 
taught  the  whole  of  life  in  a  new  rhythm."  The  "  cup 
of  dole  "  which  God  had  given  her  has  become  sweet. 

The  names  of  country,  heaven,  are  changed  away 
For  where  thou  art  or  shalt  be,  there  or  here  ; 
And  this — this  lute  and  song — loved  yesterday, 
(The  singing  angels  know)  are  only  dear, 
Because  thy  name  moves  right  in  what  they  say. 

Clearly  there  is  some  hope  for  a  lover  whose  lady 
says  this.  In  the  ninth  she  recurs  to  her  unworthiness. 
She  will  not  soil  his  purple  with  her  dust.  She  cannot 
deny,  however,  that  she  loves  him.  This  is  a  con- 
fession of  some  importance,  and  we  are  not  surprised 
to  find  that  she  dwells  on  it  a  little.  In  the  tenth 
sonnet  she  plucks  up  heart  considerably,  reflecting 
that  her  love  qualifies  her  unworthiness  ;  and  a  noble 
poem,  with  true  love  beating  like  a  melodious  pulse  in 
every  line,  is  the  result. 

Yet,  love,  mere  love,  is  beautiful  indeed 
And  worthy  of  acceptation.     Fire  is  bright, 
Let  temple  burn,  or  flax — an  equal  light 
Leaps  in  the  flame  from  cedar-plank  or  weed. 
And  love  is  fire  :  and  when  I  say  at  need 


90  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

I  love  thee — mark ! — I  love  thee  ! — in  thy  sight 

I  stand  transfigured,  glorified  aright, 

With  conscience  of  the  new  rays  that  proceed 

Out  of  my  face  toward  thine.     There's  nothing  low 

In  love,  when  love  the  lowest :  meanest  creatures 

Who  love  God,  God  accepts  while  loving  so. 

And  what  I  feel,  across  the  inferior  features 

Of  what  I  am,  doth  flash  itself,  and  show 

How  that  great  work  of  Love  enhances  Nature's. 

These  lines  will  recall  to  many  the  parallel  passage 
in  In  Memoriam,  in  which  Tennyson,  while  confessing 
his  inability  to  meet  his  Arthur  on  a  level  of  intel- 
lectual equality,  asserts  the  greatness  of  his  love. 

I  loved  thee,  spirit,  and  love,  nor  can 
The  soul  of  Shakespeare  love  thee  more. 

There  is  no  reason,  however,  to  doubt  that  emotional 
power  is  normally,  though  perhaps  not  invariably, 
proportioned  to  intellectual  power,  and  that  only  a 
Shakespeare  could  either  think  or  love  like  Shake- 
speare. The  lady  continues  to  betray  something  of 
coyness.  "I  stand  unwon,  however  wooed."  She 
loves,  but  renounces.  She  may  as  well  tell  him, 
nevertheless,  on  what  grounds,  if  he  must  love  her, 
she  chooses  to  be  loved.  A  delicately  beautiful  sonnet 
carries  this  love-message. 

If  thou  must  love  me,  let  it  be  for  naught 
Except  for  love's  sake  only.     Do  not  say, 
"  I  love  her  for  her  smile — her  look — her  way 
Of  speaking  gently — for  a  trick  of  thought 
That  falls  in  well  with  mine,  and  certes  brought 
A  sense  of  pleasant  ease  on  such  a  day  " — 
For  these  things  in  themselves,  Beloved,  may 


Love  Sonnets.  91 


Be  changed,  or  change  for  thee — and  love  so  wrought 
May  be  unwrought  so.    Neither  love  me  for 
Thine  own  dear  pity'sjwiping  my  cheeks  dry — 
Since  one  might  well  forget  to  weep  who  bore 
Thy  comfort  long,  and  lose  thy  love  thereby. 
But  love  me  for  love's  sake,  that  evermore 
Thou  may'st  love  on  through  love's  eternity. 

In  yet  another  she  lingers  hesitating,  and  will  not 
abandon  her  attitude  of  loving  renunciation.  In  the 
sixteenth,  however,  she  gives  way.  The  lover  has 
overcome !  He  has  prevailed  against  her  fears,  and 
may  throw  the  purple  of  his  kingliness  around  her  ! 

Beloved,  I  at  last  record 

Here  ends  my  doubt !     If  thou  invite  me  forth, 
I  rise  above  abasement  at  the  word. 
Make  thy  love  larger  to  enlarge  my  worth. 

An  exultant  sonnet  follows,  in  which  she  lauds  the 
poetry  of  her  lover. 

My  poet,  thou  canst  touch  on  all  the  notes 
God  set  between  His  After  and  Before, 
And  strike  up  and  strike  off  the  general  roar 
Of  the  rushing  worlds,  a  melody  that  floats 
In  a  serene  air  purely. 

She  asks  him  how  he  will  have  her  "  for  most  use," 
since  God  has  devoted  her  to  the  service  of  waiting  on 
him. 

A  hope,  to  sing  by  gladly  ?  or  a  fine, 

Sad  memory,  with  thy  songs  to  interfuse  ? 

A  shade,  in  which  to  sing,  of  palm  or  pine  ? 

A  grave  on  which  to  rest  from  singing  ?    Choose. 

Are   not   these   lines   exquisitely   appropriate    to   a 


92  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

woman-poet  addressing  her  accepted  lover,  who  is  also 
a  poet  ?  It  is  pleasant,  all  the  same,  to  be  reminded 
that  in  this  ideal  courtship  there  were  some  incidents 
of  a  sort  met  with  on  more  ordinary  occasions  of  the 
kind.  The  lady  gave  her  lover  a  lock  of  hair,  and 
commemorated  the  event  in  a  sonnet,  in  which  the 
undertone  of  sadness  that  may  generally  be  heard  in 
Mrs.  Browning's  poetry  is  clearly  audible. 

I  never  gave  a  lock  of  hair  away 

To  a  man,  Dearest,  except  this  to  thee, 

Which  now  upon  my  fingers  thoughtfully 

I  ring  out  to  the  full  brown  length  and  say, 

"  Take  it."     My  day  of  youth  went  yesterday ; 

My  hair  no  longer  bounds  to  my  foot's  glee, 

Nor  plant  I  it  from  rose  or  myrtle-tree, 

As  girls  do,  any  more.     It  only  may 

Now  shade,  on  two  pale  cheeks,  the  marks  of  tears, 

Taught  drooping  from  the  head  that  hangs  aside 

Through  sorrow's  trick.     I  thought  the  funeral  shears 

Would  take  this  first,  but  love  is  justified ; 

Take  it  thou, — finding  pure,  from  all  those  years, 

The  kiss  my  mother  left  here  when  she  died. 

In  return  the  poet-lover  gives  her  a  lock  from  his 
head.  It  is  "  purply  black."  She  suggests  that  the 
shade  of  the  poet's  bay-crown  lies  on  it,  it  is  so  dark 
and  places  it  on  her  heart,  to  be  warm  with  her  love 
until  she  grows  cold  in  death.  In  the  next  she 
continues  the  expression  of  her  love  and  pride,  won- 
dering how,  although  he  was  in  the  world  a  year  ago, 
it  had  been  possible  that  she  was  unconscious  of  his 
presence.  "  Atheists,"  she  says,  "  are  as  dull,  who 
cannot  guess  God's  presence  out  of  sight."  The 
thought  has  probably  occurred  to  many  fond  lovers 


Love  Sonnets.  93 


"  How  strange  that  we  were  both  in  the  world  so  long 
without  being  aware  of  each  other's  existence !  "  but 
I  do  not  remember  seeing  it  elsewhere  expressed  in 
verse  or  prose.  Having  put  love's  chalice  to  her  lips, 
she  will  now  drink  of  it  boldly.  She  tells  her  lover  to 
repeat,  again  and  again,  that  he  loves  her.  She  cares 
not  though  it  may  seem  a  "cuckoo-strain,"  for  she 
will  have  the  air  filled  with  it  as  the  vales  are  filled 
with  the  voice  of  the  blithe  bird  of  spring.  You 
cannot  have  too  many  stars,  or  too  many  flowers,  or 
too  many  assurances  of  love. 

Say  them  dost  love  me,  love  me,  love  me — toll 
The  silver  iterance  ! — only  minding,  Dear, 
To  love  me  also  in  silence,  with  thy  soul. 

The  same  strain  of  proud  and  exultant  joy  in  love 
and  the  loved  one  is  continued  through  several 
spirited  and  splendid  sonnets.  The  sadness  in  them 
is  but  a  dark  background  to  the  rainbow  of  their  joy. 
She  tells  him  in  one  of  the  noblest  of  the  series, 
which  I  must  quote  entire,  that  her  chamber  had 
been  peopled  by  visions  before  he  came. 

I  lived  with  visions  for  my  company 

Instead  of  men  and  women,  years  ago, 

And  found  them  gentle  mates,  nor  thought  to  know 

A  sweeter  music  than  they  played  to  me. 

But  soon  their  trailing  purple  was  not  free 

Of  this  world's  dust, — their  lutes  did  silent  grow, 

And  I  myself  grew  faint  and  blind  below 

Their  vanishing  eyes.    Then  THOU  did'st  come — to  be, 

Beloved,  what  they  seemed.    Their  shining  fronts, 

Their  songs,  their  splendours — (better,  yet  the  same, 


94  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

As  river- water  hallowed  into  fonts) 

Met  in  thee,  and  from  out  thee  overcame 

My  soul  with  satisfaction  of  all  wants — 

Because  G-od's  gifts  put  man's  best  dreams  to  shame. 

There  are  forty-three  of  these  sonnets,  and  I  had 
marked  several  others  for  extract ;  but  my  desire  is 
to  quote  only  enough  to  create  in  the  reader  an  im- 
portunate wish  for  more.  A  very  beautiful  one  de- 
scribes the  love-letters  she  had  received,  or,  rather, 
chronicles  a  few  of  them  in  the  order  of  ascending  in- 
tensity of  love.  It  would  be  too  cruel  to  forbear 
quoting  the  thirty-eighth,  which  contains  an  account  of 
three  kisses  which  the  lover  had  the  bliss  of  bestowing 
upon  the  lady. 

First  time  he  kissed  me,  he  but  only  kissed 

The  fingers  of  this  hand  wherewith  I  write, 

And  ever  since  it  grew  more  clean  and  white, 

Slow  to  world -greetings,  quick  with  its  "  Oh,  list," 

When  the  angels  speak.     A  ring  of  amethyst 

I  could  not  wear  here  plainer  to  my  sight, 

Than  that  first  kiss.     The  second  passed  in  height 

The  first,  and  sought  the  forehead,  and  half  missed, 

Half  falling  on  the  hair.     0  beyond  meed ! 

That  was  the  chrism  of  love,  which  love's  own  crown, 

With  sanctifying  sweetness,  did  precede. 

The  third  upon  my  lips  was  folded  down 

In  perfect,  purple  state !  since  when,  indeed, 

I  have  been  proud  and  said,  "  My  love,  my  own." 

But  the  sonnet  which  of  all  the  forty-three  attests, 
to  my  thinking,  most  explicitly,  that  tenderness  of 
domestic  sympathy,  that  intense  feeling  of  home  joys, 
that  loving  remembrance  of  the  friends  of  her  child- 


Love  Sonnets.  95 


hood,  which  characterises  Mrs.  Browning,  is  the  thirty- 
fifth;     I  quote  part  of  it. 

If  I  leave  all  to  thee,  wilt  thou  exchange 
And  be  all  to  me  ?     Shall  I  never  miss 
Home-talk  and  blessing  and  the  common  kiss 
That  comes  to  each  in  turn,  nor  count  it  strange, 
When  I  look  up,  to  drop  on  a  new  range 
Of  walls  and  floors — another  home  than  this  ? 
Nay,  wilt  thou  fill  that  place  by  me  which  is 
Filled  by  dead  eyes  too  tender  to  know  change  ? 

So  far  as  I  know,  there  is  not  in  the  history  of  lite- 
rature a  parallel  instance  to  the  marriage  of  Elizabeth 
Barrett  Barrett  and  Robert  Browning.  Poets  both  of 
undoubted  genius,  they  were  yet  of  markedly  diverse 
genius.  Their  harmony  may,  on  that  account,  have 
been  only  the  more  complete.  In  the  works  of  Mr. 
Browning  are  to  be  found  many  references  to  Mrs. 
Browning,  all  couched  in  terms  of  ardent  affection. 
More  than  once,  indeed,  when  she  is  the  subject  of  his 
verse,  he  seems  to  pass  into  a  less  rugged,  a  more 
tenderly  melodious  and  chastened,  mood  of  literary 
execution  than  that  in  which  he  usually  works. 
We  have  nothing  from  his  pen  more  delicate  in  its 
beauty  than  the  One  Word  More,  in  which  he  dedicates 
to  her  his  series  of  poems  called  Men  and  Women. 
Here  are  a  few  of  the  most  quotable,  not  by  any 
means  the  best,  of  the  lines. 

Love,  you  saw  me  gather  men  and  women, 
Live  or  dead  or  fashioned  by  my  fancy, 
Enter  each  and  all,  and  use  their  service, 
Speak  from  every  mouth, — the  speech,  a  poem. 


96  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

Hardly  shall  I  tell  my  joys  and  sorrows, 
Hopes  and  fears,  belief  and  disbelieving  : 
I  am  mine  and  yours — the  rest  be  all  men's, 
Karshook,  Cleon,  Norbert,  and  the  fifty. 
Let  me  speak  this  once  in  my  true  person, 
Not  as  Lippo,  Koland,  or  Andrea, 
Though  the  fruit  of  speech  be  just  this  sentence — 
Pray  you,  look  on  these  my  men  and  women, 
Take  and  keep  my  fifty  poems  finished ; 
Where  my  heart  lies,  let  my  brain  lie  also  ! 
Poor  the  speech ;  be  how  I  speak,  for  all  things. 

Once  he  permits  us  to  glance  into  the  sacred  privacy 
of  his  evening  home.  His  "  perfect  wife  "  sits  "  read- 
ing by  firelight,"  her  "  great  brow  "  propped  by  "  the 
spirit  small  hand  " — a  vignette  picture  that  vividly 
reminds  us  of  those  of  herself  in  her  girlish  verses,  as 
she  sat  studying  by  the  side  of  her  favourite  brother. 


CHAPTEE  XI. 

POEMS   OF  PATRIOTIC  SYMPATHY. 

WE  saw  how  nobly  Mrs.  Browning  responded  to 
the  highest  sentiments,  the  most  heroic 
endeavours,  of  her  time,  in  connection  with  the 
movement  for  the  abolition  of  slavery,  and  with  the 
general  philanthropic  impulse  and  effort  to  alleviate 
the  distress  of  factory  operatives,  of  overworked 
children,  and  of  all  men  and  women  into  whose  soul 
the  iron  of  luxurious,  indifferent,  cruel  civilisation  had 
too  deeply  entered.  The  Cry  of  the  Children  is  part  of 
the  inspired  poetry  of  our  age,  a  word  of  God  in  a 
very  strict  and  solemn  sense.  Similar  in  spirit,  though 
not  so  deeply  imbued  with  immortal  fire,  is  A  Song  for 
the  Ragged  Schools  of  London.  It  was  written  in 
Rome,  and  the  locality  lends  colour  to  the  poem. 

I  am  listening  here  in  Rome, 

And  the  Eomans  are  confessing, 
"  English  children  pass  in  bloom, 

All  God  ever  made  for  blessing. 

"  Angli  angeli  !  (resumed 

From  the  mediaeval  story) 
Such  rose  angelhoods,  emplumed 

In  such  ringlets  of  pure  glory! " 


98  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

Can  we  smooth  down  the  bright  hair, 

O  my  sisters,  calm,  unthrilled  in 
Our  hearts'  pulses  ?     Can  we  bear 
•  The  sweet  looks  of  our  own  children, 

While  those  others,  lean  and  small, 

Scurf  and  mildew  of  the  city, 
Spot  our  streets,  convict  us  all, 

Till  we  take  them  into  pity  ? 

In  this  instance,  too,  Mrs.  Browning's  appeal  has 
not  been  without  effect.  England  has  heard  the  cry 
of  the  children  both  in  the  factory  and  in  the  street ; 
and  if  all  has  not  yet  been  done  that  ought  to  be  done, 
a  great  improvement  has  been  effected  upon  the  state 
of  things  as  it  was  five-and-twenty  years  ago. 

Her  heart  and  brain  were  large  enough  not  only  for 
the  cause  of  social  and  philanthropic  reform,  but  for 
that  of  political  advancement.  She  sympathised 
ardently  with  the  Italians  in  their  cherished  hope  of 
breaking  the  chains  that  bound  them  under  many 
rulers,  and  of  asserting  their  independence,  unity,  and 
freedom  as  a  nation.  When  Napoleon  III.  crossed 
the  Alps  to  strike  the  first  decisive  blow  on  behalf  of 
Italy,  she  hailed  him  in  an  enthusiastic  Ode,  which 
one  now  reads  with  mixed  feelings,  dubious  whether 
the  poet,  seeing  the  Emperor  in  the  halo  of  his  Italian 
policy,  did  not  ascribe  to  him  some  merits  and  virtues 
that  history  will  not  concede.  At  all  events,  it  has 
proved  a  true  prophecy  in  recognising  the  expedition 
of  the  French  Emperor  as  the  beginning  of  a  new 
era  for  Italy.  In  the  first  stanza  the  poet  describes 
his  elevation  to  the  throne. 


Napoleon  III.  99 


Emperor,  Emperor ! 

From  the  centre  to  the  shore 

From  the  Seine  back  to  the  Rhine, 
Stood  eight  millions  up  and  swore 

By  their  manhood's  right  Divine 
So  to  elect  and  legislate, 

This  man  should  renew  the  line 
Broken  in  a  strain  of  fate 
And  leagued  kings  at  Waterloo, 

When  the  people's  hands  let  go. 

The  eight  millions  shouted.  Thinkers  stood  aside 
to  let  the  nation  decide.  Some  hated  the  new  fact ; 
some  quailed ;  some  cursed ;  some  wept.  The  poet 
was  silent. 

That  day  I  did  not  hate, 

Nor  doubt,  nor  quail,  nor  curse. 
I,  reverencing  the  people,  did  not  bate 
My  reverence  of  their  deed  and  oracle, 
Nor  vainly  prate 

Of  better  and  of  worse, 
Against  the  great  conclusion  of  their  will. 

Liberals  too  often  forget  that  it  is  a  sin  against  free- 
dom to  drown  in  floods  of  flattery  all  acknowledgment 
of  the  faults  and  shortcomings  whereby  nations  have 
contributed  to  their  own  undoing.  No  one  could 
rejoice  more  heartily  in  the  establishment  of  the 
French  Kepublic  than  I  do ;  but  the  enormous  majori- 
ties by  which  the  French  people  first  called  Napoleon 
III.  to  the  Presidency,  and  then  confirmed  him  on  the 
throne,  ought  not  to  be  swept  from  the  historical 
memory.  It  is  well  that  Mrs.  Browning  has  put  them 
on  record. 

7—2 


100  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

Nevertheless,  she  did  not  feel  herself  called  upon  to 
celebrate  or  to  sanction  what  had  been  done. 

O  voice  and  verse 

Which  God  set  in  me  to  acclaim  and  sing 
Conviction,  exaltation,  aspiration, 
We  gave  no  music  to  the  patent  thing, 
Nor  spared  a  holy  rhythm  to  throb  and  swim 
About  the  name  of  him 
Translated  to  the  sphere  of  domination 

By  democratic  passion. 
I  was  not  used,  at  least, 

Nor  can  be,  now  or  then, 
To  stroke  the  ermine  beast 

On  any  kind  of  throne, 

(Though  builded  by  a  nation  for  its  own), 
And  swell  the  surging  choir  for  kings  of  men— 
"  Emperor 
Evermore." 

Now,  however,  when  he  leaves  "  the  purple  throng 
of  vulgar  monarchs,"  and  assays  to  help  "the  broken 
hearts  of  nations  to  be  strong,"  she,  a  poet  of  the 
people,  meets  him  on  the  Alpine  snows,  and  finds  him 
"great  enough  to  praise."  Eeflecting  on  the  hesita- 
tion, if  not  the  express  disapproval,  with  which 
English  statesmen  had  regarded  the  Emperor's  Italian 
enterprise,  she  addresses  him  thus  : 

An  English  poet  warns  thee  to  maintain 
God's  word,  not  England's :  let  His  truth  be  true, 
And  all  men  liars !  with  His  truth  respond 
To  all  men's  lie. 

The  work  was,  indeed,  but  half  done.  Selfish  and 
cruel  principalities  and  powers  stepped  in  to  arrest  the 
emancipation  of  Italy.  But  the  poet  expresses  conn- 


Italian  Freedom.  101 


dence  that  the  imperfection  of  what  has  been  done  will 
one  day  be  removed,  and  with  this  prophecy,  long  since 
fulfilled,  she  concludes  her  Ode  : 

Courage,  whoever  circumvents ! 

Courage,  courage,  whoever  is  base ! 

The  soul  of  a  high  intent,  be  it  known, 

Can  die  no  more  than  any  soul 

Which  God  keeps  by  Him  under  the  throne ; 

And  this,  at  whatever  interim, 
Shall  live,  and  be  consummated 

Into  the  being  of  deeds  made  whole. 

Courage,  courage !  Happy  is  he, 
Of  whom  (himself  among  the  dead 
And  silent),  this  word  shall  be  said: — 
That  he  might  have  had  the  world  with  him, 
But  chose  to  side  with  suffering  men, 
And  had  the  world  against  him  when 

He  came  to  deliver  Italy. 
"  Emperor 
Evermore." 

The  two  last  words  are  repeated  at  the  end  of  every 
stanza.  Their  effect  will  now  strike  some  as  ludicrous 
and  some  as  melancholy.  It  remains  true,  however, 
that  Napoleon  III.'s  Italian  expedition  was  one  of 
the  soundest  bits  of  work  done  in  the  recent  political 
history  of  Europe. 

If  Napoleon  III.  was  drawn  aside  by  priests  and 
women  from  his  onward  path  as  deliverer  of  Italy, 
it  was  not  to  Mrs.  Browning  that  he  could  look  for 
any  sympathy  in  his  weakness.  The  Jesuits  and  the 
Papacy  have  had  few  more  fervent  or  more  frank 
detesters  than  she.  In  common  with  a  host  of  able 
men  and  women  of  her  generation,  she  inherited,  from 


102  Elizabeth  Barrett  Broivning. 

the  great  Evangelical  party  of  fifty  or  sixty  years  ago, 
not  only  its  moral  vehemence,  but  its  cordial  hatred  of 
Popery.  We  find  this  in  Carlyle,  Macaulay,  Stephen, 
Henry  Rogers,  Thackeray,  Browning,  and  even  in 
Tennyson,  though  in  this  last  it  has  been  kept  under 
careful  restraint.  That  habit  of  euphuistic  reference 
to  the  Eoman  Church,  that  ecstasy  of  admiration  for 
Dr.  Newman,  with  which  we  are  now  so  well 
acquainted,  belong  to  a  new  generation,  a  generation 
delicate  in  its  culture  and  refined  in  its  feelings,  but 
hardly,  perhaps,  dowered  with  the  intellectual  bone 
and  sinew  of  the  earlier  race. 

Mrs.  Browning's  poem,  entitled  A  View  Across 
the  Eoman  Campagna,  in  which  she  addresses  the 
Pope,  or  the  Papacy,  in  language  of  keen  imagina- 
tive scorn,  would  now  be  considered,  in  polite 
literary  circles,  very  bad  form.  The  lines,  however, 
are  fine,  and  there  are  some  of  us  who  would 
not  yet  be  ashamed  to  confess  sympathy  with  their 
spirit.  The  poet  pictures  to  herself  the  Papacy  as 
a  great  ship,  tempest-tossed  on  the  sea  of  the 
Campagna.  In  order  that  this  idea  may  not  seem  to 
us  too  bold,  and  also  that  its  expressiveness  may  be 
felt,  we  shall  do  well  to  read  Mr.  Ruskin's  descrip- 
tion of  the  plain  of  the  Campagna.  "  Perhaps,"  says 
that  prose-poet,  "there  is  no  more  impressive  scene 
on  earth  than  the  solitary  extent  of  the  Campagna  of 
Rome  under  evening  light.  Let  the  reader  imagine 
himself  for  a  moment  withdrawn  from  the  sounds  and 
motion  of  the  living  world,  and  sent  forth  alone  into 


The  Roman  Campagna.  103 

this  wild  and  wasted  plain.  The  earth  yields  and 
crumbles  beneath  his  feet,  tread  he  never  so  lightly, 
for  its  substance  is  white,  hollow,  and  carious,  like  the 
dusty  wreck  of  the  bones  of  men.  The  long,  knotted 
grass  waves  and  tosses  feebly  in  the  evening  wind,  and 
the  shadows  of  its  motion  shake  feverishly  along  the 
banks  of  ruin  that  lift  themselves  to  the  sunlight. 
Hillocks  of  mouldering  earth  heave  around  him,  as  if 
the  dead  beneath  were  struggling  in  their  sleep  ;  scat- 
tered blocks  of  black  stone  four-square,  remnants  of 
mighty  edifices,  not  one  left  upon  another,  lie  upon 
them  to  keep  them  down.  A  dull  purple  poisonous 
haze  stretches  level  against  the  desert,  veiling  its 
spectral  wrecks  of  massy  ruins,  on  whose  rents  the  red 
light  rests  like  dying  fire  on  defiled  altars.  The  blue 
ridge  of  the  Alban  Mount  lifts  itself  against  the  solemn 
space  of  green,  clear,  quiet  sky.  Watch-towers  of  dark 
clouds  stand  steadfastly  along  the  promontories  of  the 
Apennines.  From  the  plain  to  the  mountains,  the 
shattered  aqueducts,  pier  beyond  pier,  melt  into  the 
darkness,  like  shadowy  and  countless  troops  of  funeral 
mourners,  passing  from  a  nation's  grave." 

Such  is  the  sea  on  which  floats  the  ship  of   Mrs. 
Browning's  poem.     It  opens  thus  : 

Over  the  dumb  Campagna- sea, 

Out  in  the  offing  through  mist  and  rain, 

Saint  Peter's  Church  heaves  silently 
Like  a  mighty  ship  in  pain, 
Facing  the  tempest  with  struggle  and  strain. 

Motionless  waifs  of  ruined  towers, 
Soundless  breakers  of  desolate  land  : 


104  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

The  sullen  surf  of  the  mist  devours 

That  mountain -range  upon  either  hand, 
Eaten  away  from  its  outline  grand. 

And  over  the  dumb  Campagna-sea 

Where  the  ship  of  the  Church  heaves  on  to  wreck, 
Alone  and  silent  as  God  must  be, 

The  Christ  walks.     Ay,  but  Peter's  neck 

Is  stiff  to  turn  on  the  foundering  deck. 

Peter,  Peter !   If  such  be  thy  name, 

Now  leave  the  ship  for  another  to  steer, 

And  proving  thy  faith  evermore  the  same, 

Come  forth,  tread  out  through  the  dark  and  drear, 
Since  He  who  walks  on  the  sea  is  here. 

But  the  modern  Peter  does  not  move.  He  is  no 
longer  rash,  "  as  in  old  Galilee."  He  will  not  quit  the 
good  things  of  temporal  power,  and  content  himself 
with  the  homely  fare  of  fishermen,  even  though  Christ 
be  of  the  party. 

Peter,  Peter !     He  does  not  stir  ; 

His  nets  are  heavy  with  silver  fish  ; 
He  reckons  his  gains,  and  is  keen  to  infer — 

"  The  broil  on  the  shore,  if  the  Lord  should  wish ; 

But  the  sturgeon  goes  to  the  Caesar's  dish." 

Many  voices  would  now  be  raised  in  protest  against 
the  next  verse,  in  which  the  Papacy  is  accused  of 
having  bent  the  knee  to  Mammon. 

Peter,  Peter  !  thou  fisher  of  men, 
Fisher  of  fish  wouldst  thou  live  instead  ? 

Haggling  for  pence  with  the  other  Ten, 
Cheating  the  market  at  so  much  a  head, 
Griping  the  bag  of  the  traitor  Dead. 

Whether  there  is  or  is  not  justice  in  this  charge,  I 


Mother  and  Poet.  105 

shall  not  decisively  say.  My  own  feeling  is  that  it  is 
exaggerated.  Avarice  does  not  seem  to  rue  to  have 
been  one  of  the  eminent  vices  of  the  Papacy.  The 
Church  of  Eome  has  not  stooped  to  barter  freedom  for 
endowment. 

The  last  verse  is  prophetic  of  woe  to  the  Papacy ; 
but  the  Church  of  Kome  has  outlived  many  grim 
prognostications. 

At  the  triple  crow  of  the  Gallic  cock 
Thou  weep'st  not,  thou,  though  thine  eyes  be  dazed  : 

What  bird  comes  next  in  the  tempest-shock  ? — 
Vultures  !  see, — as  when  Komulus  gazed, — • 
To  inaugurate  Eome  for  a  world  amazed  ! 

Mrs.  Browning  watched  the  course  of  the  Italian 
war  with  an  interest  that  may  be  imagined,  and 
celebrated  some  of  its  heroic  and  touching  incidents. 
One  of  these  gave  occasion  to  the  piece  entitled 
Mother  and  Poet,  written  at  Turin  after  Gaeta  was 
taken.  I  shall  quote  a  few  of  the  stanzas, — they  tell 
their  own  tale.  A  patriot  mother  had  sent  her  two 
sons  to  the  war. 

At  first,  happy  news  came,  in  gay  letters  moiled 
With  my  kisses, — of  camp-life  and  glory,  and  how 

They  both  loved  me  ;  and,  soon  coming  home  to  be  spoiled, 
In  return  would  fan  off  every  fly  from  my  brow 
With  their  green  laurel-bough. 

Then  was  triumph  at  Turin :  "  Ancona  was  free  !  " 
And  some  one  came  out  of  the  cheers  in  the  street, 

With  a  face  pale  as  stone,  to  say  something  to  me, 
My  Guido  was  dead !  I  fell  down  at  his  feet, 
While  they  cheered  in  the  street. 


106  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

I  bore  it ;  friends  soothed  me  ;  my  grief  looked  sublime 
As  the  ransom  of  Italy.     One  boy  remained 

To  be  leant  on  and  walked  with,  recalling  the  time 
When  the  first  grew  immortal,  while  both  of  us  strained 
To  the  height  he  had  gained. 

And  letters  still  came,  shorter,  sadder,  more  strong 
Writ  now  but  in  one  hand,  "  I  was  not  to  faint, — 

One  loved  me  for  two — would  be  with  me  ere  long  : 
And  Viva  V Italia  ! — Tie  died  for,  our  saint, 
Who  forbids  our  complaint." 

My  Nanni  would  add,  "  He  was  safe,  and  aware 

Of  a  presence  that  turned  off  the  balls — was  imprest 

It  was  Guido  himself  who  knew  what  I  could  bear, 
And  how  'twas  impossible,  quite  dispossessed, 
To  live  on  for  the  rest." 

On  which,  without  pause,  up  the  telegraph-line 
Swept  smoothly  the  next  news  from  Gaeta : — Shot. 
Tell  his  mother.      Ah,  ah,    "his,"  "their"   mother, — not 

"mine," 
No  voice  says  "  My  mother  "  again  to  me.     What ! 

You  think  Guido  forgot  ? 
****** 

Dead  !     One  of  them  shot  by  the  sea  in  the  east, 
And  one  of  them  shot  in  the  west  by  the  sea. 

Both !  both  my  boys  !     If  in  keeping  the  feast 
You  want  a  great  song  for  your  Italy  free, 
Let  none  look  at  me. 

Speaking  generally  of  Mrs.  Browning's  political 
poetry,  I  should  pronounce  it  inferior,  viewed  as  poetry* 
to  most  of  her  other  work.  Splendid  as  eloquence,  it 
has  not  quite  the  poetic  perfection  of  form.  Its  moral 
qualities  are  inestimable. 


CHAPTEE   XII. 
AURORA     LEIGH. 

THE  most  extensive  of  all  Mrs.  Browning's  poems 
is  Aurora  Leigh,  and  its  acceptance  with  readers 
of  poetry  has  been  attested  by  the  sale  of  many  editions. 
The  poet,  in  dedicating  it  to  her  "  dearest  cousin  and 
friend,"  John  Kenyon,  in  1856,  describes  it  as  "the  most 
mature  "  of  her  works,  and  the  one  in  which  she  has 
expressed  her  "highest  convictions  upon  Life  and  Art.'' 
It  is  a  tale  in  nine  Books,  and  may,  with  some  indefi- 
niteness,  yet  reasonable  accuracy,  be  pronounced  a 
modern  epic,  of  which  the  central  figure  is  a  woman, 
and  whose  theme  is  social  amelioration.  Not  arms 
and  the  man,  but  social  problems  and  the  woman,  are 
sung  by  Mrs.  Browning,  and  whether  she  solves  the 
problems  or  not,  it  must  be  admitted  that  she  has 
produced  a  taking  and  beautiful  poem.  I  have  always 
felt  that  it  had  defects,  some  of  them  serious,  but  each 
new  reading  has  heightened  my  conception  of  its 
power  and  splendour.  The  pitch  of  its  intensity, 
sustained  from  beginning  to  end,  is  astonishing  in  a 


108  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

work  not  much  shorter  than  Paradise  Lost.  There 
is  no  straining ;  nothing  to  hint  that  the  poet 
worked  with  difficulty ;  and  yet  the  richness  of  colour 
and  strength  of  imaginative  fire  are  such  as  we  should 
look  for  in  brief  lyrical  effusions  rather  than  in  a  long 
narrative  poem.  In  the  rapidity  and  animation  of  the 
style — the  quick  succession  of  incident,  the  sense  of 
motion  everywhere — the  book  recalls  the  manner  of 
Homer.  It  is  instinct  with  music.  We  feel  that  the 
poet  does  not  recite,  she  sings.  In  its  rich  and  ringing 
melody,  as  well  as- in  its  warm  imaginative  glow,  it  is 
superior  to  George  Eliot's  Spanish  Gipsy. 

The  first  Book  introduces  us  to  the  heroine.  She  is 
a  poet,  and  speaks  for  herself.  "  I  who  have  written 
much  in  prose  and  verse  for  others'  uses  will  write 
now  for  mine."  That  Aurora  Leigh  is,  to  some  extent, 
what  Mrs.  Browning  was,  cannot,  I  think,  be  doubtful ; 
but  I  am  convinced  that  we  should  err  if  we  looked 
upon  the  resemblance  between  the  two  as  very  close. 
This  heroine  is  not  less  a  creation  of  her  mind  than 
the  Duchess  May  or  the  Lady  Geraldine,  in  both  of 
whom,  we  may  be  sure,  there  are  traces,  and  deep 
traces,  of  herself.  Aurora  is  half-Italian  by  blood,  and 
is  not  only  born,  but  brought  up  till  she  is  thirteen,  in 
Italy ;  and  the  poet  gives  good  heed  to  the  fact  that 
there  is  an  Italian  element  in  her  character.  Her 
father  was  an  English  gentleman  of  property,  her 
mother  a  Florentine.  The  latter  had  died  when 
Aurora  was  four  years  old.  The  mother's  death  suggests 
some  priceless  lines  on  mother's  love,  in  which  we 


Mother's  Love.  109 


seem  to  put  our  ear  to  Mrs.  Browning's  heart  and  hear 
its  beating. 

I  felt  a  mother-want  about  the  world, 

And  still  went  seeking,  like  a  bleating  lamb 

Left  out  at  night,  in  shutting  up  the  fold, — 

As  restless  as  a  nest- deserted  bird 

Grown  chill  through  something  being  away,  though  what 

It  knows  not.     I,  Aurora  Leigh,  was  born 

To  make  my  father  sadder,  and  myself 

Not  over-joyous,  truly.     Women  know 

The  way  to  rear  up  children  (to  be  just), 

They  know  a  simple,  merry,  tender  knack 

Of  tying  sashes,  fitting  baby-shoes, 

And  stringing  pretty  words  that  make  no  sense, 

And  kissing  full  sense  into  empty  words ; 

Which  things  are  corals  to  cut  life  upon, 

Although  such  trifles.         .... 

.     Fathers  love  as  well 

— Mine  did,  I  know, — but  still  with  heavier  brains, 
And  wills  more  consciously  responsible, 
And  not  as  wisely,  since  less  foolishly ; 
So  mothers  have  God's  licence  to  be  missed. 

Her  father  was  an  "  austere  Englishman,"  who, 
"  after  a  dry  lifetime  spent  at  home  in  college-learning, 
law,  and  parish  talk,"  fell  suddenly  in  love  with  a  girl 
whom  he  saw  in  an  Italian  church,  and  married  her. 
When  she  died,  he  had  her  picture  painted.  The  face, 
throat,  and  hands  having  heen  finished,  her  chamber- 
maid, "  in  hate  of  the  English-fashioned  shroud," 
insisted  that  she  should  be  clad  in  "the  last  brocade 
she  dressed  in  at  the  Pitti."  The  effect  was  "very 
strange/'  The  whiteness  of  the  corpse-face,  the  red 
stiff  silk  of  the  dress,  impressed  the  imagination  of 
the  child,  and  she  would  sit  for  hours  upon  the  floor, 


110  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

staring  at  the  picture.  As  she  grew  in  years,  and  was 
taught  by  her  father  to  read  a  variety  of  books,  she 
associated  whatever  she  read  with  the  richly-dressed 
figure  and  dead-face,  and  it  became  to  her  the 
emblem  of  "  the  incoherences  of  change  and  death," 
mixed  and  merged  in  the  fair  "  mystery  of  perpetual 
life."  When  this  had  continued  for  nine  years,  her 
father  also  died,  and  she  was  sent  to  England. 

Coming  from   the  Italian  home  of  her  childhood, 
Aurora  Leigh  thought  England  a  poor  affair. 

The  train  swept  us  on. 

Was  this  my  father's  England  ?     The  great  Isle  ? 
The  ground  seemed  cut  up  from  the  fellowship 
Of  verdure,  field  from  field,  as  man  from  man. 

Her   aunt    received    her    without    much    show    of 
affection. 

I  think  I  see  my  father's  sister  stand 

Upon  the  hall-step  of  her  country-house 

To  give  me  welcome.    She  stood  straight  and  calm, 

Her  somewhat  narrow  forehead  braided  tight, 

As  if  for  taming  accidental  thoughts 

From  possible  pulses;  brown  hair  pricked  with  grey 

By  frigid  use  of  life  (she  was  not  old, 

Although  my  father's  elder  by  a  year); 

A  nose  drawn  sharply,  yet  in  delicate  lines ; 

A  close,  mild  mouth,  a  little  soured  about 

The  ends,  through  speaking  unrequited  loves, 

Or  peradventure  niggardly  half-truths ; 

Eyes  of  no  colour, — once  they  might  have  smiled, 

But  never,  never  have  forgot  themselves 

In  smiling  ;  cheeks,  in  which  was  yet  a  rose 

Of  perished  summers,  like  a  rose  in  a  book, 

Kept  more  for  ruth  than  pleasure, — if  past  bloom, 

Past  fading  also. 

There  is  a  fleering,  flippant  tone  in  Aurora's  descrip- 


Aurora's  Aunt.  Ill 


tion  of  her  aunt,  which,  "betrays  a  coldness  in  the  region 
of  the  heart  constituting  a  very  serious  charge  against 
the  heroine.  The  half-contemptuous,  knowing  air  of 
what  follows  is  new  in  the  poetry,  as  it  was  foreign 
to  the  character,  of  Mrs.  Browning. 

The  poor-club  exercised  her  Christian  gifts 
Of  knitting  stockings,  stitching  petticoats, 
Because  we  are  of  one  flesh  after  all, 
And  need  one  flannel  (with  a  proper  sense 
Of  difference  in  the  quality) — and  still 
The  book-club,  guarded  from  your  modern  trick 
Of  shaking  dangerous  questions  from  the  crease, 
Preserved  her  intellectual.     She  had  lived 
A  sort  of  cage-bird  life,  born  in  a  cage, 
Accounting  that  to  leap  from  perch  to  perch 
Was  act  and  joy  enough  for  any  bird. 

At  the  first  moment  of  seeing  Aurora  the  aunt 
"seemed  moved,"  kissed  the  girl,  though  with  "  cold 
lips,"  and  suffered  her  to  cling  affectionately.  But  her 
demeanour  suddenly  changed.  Having  taken  her  niece 
into  her  own  room,  she  revealed  the  true  state  of  her 

feelings. 

With  some  strange  spasm 

Of  pain  and  passion,  she  wrung  loose  my  hands 
Imperiously,  and  held  me  at  arm's  length, 
And  with  two  grey-steel,  naked-bladed  eyes 
Searched  through  my  face— ay,  stabbed  it  through  and 

through, 

Through  brows  and  cheeks  and  chin,  as  if  to  find 
A  wicked  murderer  in  my  innocent  face, 
If  not  here,  there,  perhaps.     Then,  drawing  breath, 
She  struggled  for  her  ordinary  calm, 
And  missed  it  rather, — told  me  not  to  shrink, 
As  if  she  had  told  me  not  to  lie  or  swear. 
"  She  loved  my  father,  and  would  love  me  too 
As  long  as  I  deserved  it."     Very  kind. 


112  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

Aurora  explains  her  aunt's  proceedings  by  saying 
that  she  had  thought  to  find  traces  of  her  Italian 
mother  in  her  face. 

My  aunt 

Had  loved  my  father  truly  as  she  could, 
And  hated,  with  the  gall  of  gentle  souls, 
My  Tuscan  mother,  who  had  fooled  away 
A  wise  man  from  wise  courses,  a  good  man 
From  obvious  duties. 

Whatever  her  prejudice  against  mother  or  child,  the 
aunt  failed  in  no  duty  to  Aurora,  giving  proof,  on  the 
contrary,  of  sincere  and  considerate  affection.  She 
was  not  what  a  mother  would  have  been  ;  yet  a  kind- 
hearted  girl  would  have  felt  towards  her  more  like  a 
daughter  than  Aurora  felt.  The  sole  excuse — doubt- 
less an  import  ant- excuse — for  her  bitterness,  was  her 
aunt's  angry  feeling  towards  her  mother. 

The  girl  was  educated  according  to  her  aunt's  views 
of  what  befitted  an  English  lady. 

I  learnt  the  Collects  and  the  Catechism, 
The  Creeds,  from  Athanasius  back  to  Nice, 
The  Articles,  the  Tracts  against  the  times. 

The  italicised  word  is  Mrs.  Browning's  pointed 
estimate  of  the  Anglo-Catholic  revival  under  Newman, 
Manning,  and  Pusey.  Aurora  learned  classic  French, 
German,  a  little  algebra,  a  little  geometry,  a  very 
little  science,  a  good  deal  of  genealogical  history  and 
geographical  detail,  much  music,  drawing,  dancing, 
glass-spinning,  bird-stuffing,  flower-modelling  in  wax, 
"  because  she  liked  accomplishments  in  girls." 


Eomney  Leigh.  113 


And  last 

I  learnt  cross-stitch,  because  she  did  not  like 
To  see  me  wear  the  night  with  empty  hands, 
A-doing  nothing. 

This  education  was  torture  to  our  heroine.  "  Certain 
of  your  feebler  souls  go  out  in  such  a  process  ;  many 
pine  to  a  sick,  inodorous  light."  She  neither  died  nor 
pined  into  insipidity,  hut  showed  that  she  had  a  will, 
and  managed  to  have  a  way,  of  her  own.  The 
situation  was  not  without  its  assuagements.  There 
was  Eomney  Leigh,  for  example,  her  cousin,  whom 
she  "used  as  a  sort  of  friend."  He  was  a  few  years 
her  senior,  but  still  young — too  young,  indeed,  to  be, 
as  he  was,  master  of  the  estate  of  Leigh  Hall,  the 
sense  of  his  responsibilities  in  relation  to  which  made 
him  precociously  grave  and  earnest.  He  would  cross 
the  hills  with  gifts  of  grapes  from  his  hot-houses,  a 
book  in  his  hand,  which,  when  Aurora  lifted  the 
cover,  was  sure  to  be  statistico-philanthropical.  The 
aunt  was  indulgent  in  connection  with  the  intercourse 
of  the  cousins. 

She  almost  loved  him, — even  allowed 

That  sometimes  he  should  seem  to  sigh  my  way  ; 

It  made  him  easier  to  be  pitiful, — 

And  sighing  was  his  gift.     So,  undisturbed 

At  whiles  she  let  him  shut  my  music  up, 

And  push  my  needles  down,  and  lead  me  out 

To  see  in  that  south  angle  of  the  house 

The  figs  grow  black  as  if  by  a  Tuscan  rock, 

On  some  light  pretext.     She  would  turn  her  head 

At  other  moments,  go  to  fetch  a  thing, 

And  leave  me  breath  enough  to  speak  with  him. 

This  was  rather  tenderly  considerate  in  so  austere  a 


114  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

lady.  Might  not  Aurora  have  spared  one  kind  word 
for  an  old  maid  who,  whatever  her  faults,  had  the 
redeeming  quality  of  knowing  when  she  was  in  the 
way,  and  taking  herself  out  of  it?  On  the  state  of 
the  girl's  feelings  towards  Eomney  himself,  we  are  not, 
at  this  stage  of  the  narrative,  favoured  with  definite 
information.  One  symptom  is  interesting  :  the  skilful 
in  love-lore  will  interpret  it  for  themselves. 

Once,  he  stood  so  near 
He  dropped  a  sudden  hand  upon  my  head, 
Bent  down  on  woman's  work,  as  soft  as  rain ; 
But  then  I  rose  and  shook  it  off  as  fire, 
The  stranger's  touch  that  took  my  father's  place 
Yet  dared  seem  soft. 

At  all  events,  Romney  contributed  to  the  enliven- 
ment  of  Aurora's  existence.  She  gradually  found  that 
life  might  be  endurable  even  in  chilly  England,  and 
under  the  auspices  of  an  unsympathising  aunt.  She 
had  a  little  room  for  herself,  embosomed,  like  a  finch's 
nest,  in  greenery.  You  could  not  put  your  head  out 
at  the  window  without  getting  "  a  dash  of  dawn-dew 
from  the  honeysuckle."  Does  not  the  reader  feel  its 
freshness?  Beyond  the  elms  you  saw  the  low  hills 
behind  which  "  Cousin  Eomney 's  "  chimneys  sent  up 
the  blue  smoke  in  fine  wreaths. 

Far  above,  a  jut  of  table-land, 
A  promontory  without  water,  stretched. 
You  could  not  catch  it  if  the  day  were  thick, 
Or  took  it  for  a  cloud ;  but  otherwise 
The  vigorous  sun  would  catch  it  up  at  eve, 
And  use  it  for  an  anvil  till  he  had  filled 
The  shelves  of  heaven  with  burning  thunderbolts, 


English  Scenery.  115 

And  proved  he  need  not  rest  so  early : — then 
When  all  his  setting  trouble  was  resolved 
In  a  trance  of  passive  glory,  you  might  see 
In  apparition  on  the  golden  sky 
(Alas,  my  Giotto's  background !)  the  sheep  run 
Along  the  fine  clear  outline,  small  as  mice 
That  run  along  a  witch's  scarlet  thread. 

We  may,  I  think,  take  it  for  granted  that  Mrs. 
Browning  was  here  poetically  painting  directly  from 
nature,  and  that  she  saw  those  minute  sheep  cut  out 
in  black  against  the  sunset.  It  is  due  both  to  artists 
and  poets  to  trust  them,  though  the  particular  appear- 
ances which  they  chronicle  may  not  have  fallen  within 
one's  own  observation.  It  is  only  under  rare  atmo- 
spheric conditions  that  the  sheep  on  the  headland 
could  have  been  seen  with  Mrs.  Browning's  bodily 
eye;  but  the  mind's  eye  sees  them  with  vivid  dis- 
tinctness, and  dwells  on  them  with  keen  delight. 
That  is  enough. 

Aurora  is  at  her  best  in  describing  scenery,  and  she 
describes  England  better  than  Italy.  She  has  a  store 
of  sonorous  phrases,  and  of  imposing,  far-fetched 
imagery,  at  the  service  of  Italian  landscape;  but,  for  all 
the  loudness  of  her  praise  of  Italian  hills  and  skies,  we 
feel  that  her  heart  is  in  England.  She  tries  to  be 
smart  and  satirical  in  depicting  her  father's  country, 
but  soon  gets  into  a  more  genial  mood. 

On  English  ground 

You  understand  the  letter, — ere  the  fall, 
How  Adam  lived  in  a  garden.     All  the  fields 
Are  tied  up  fast  with  hedges,  nosegay-like  ; 

8—2 


116  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 


The  hills  are  crumpled  plains, — the  plains,  parterres, — 

The  trees,  round,  woolly,  ready  to  be  clipped ; 

And  if  you  seek  for  any  wilderness 

You  find  at  best  a  park.     A  nature  tamed 

And  grown  domestic  like  a  barn-door  fowl, 

Which  does  not  awe  you  with  its  claws  and  beak, 

Nor  tempt  you  to  an  eyrie  too  high  up, 

But  which,  in  cackling,  sets  you  thinking  of 

Your  eggs  to-morrow  at  breakfast,  in  the  pause 

Of  finer  meditation.     Kather  say 

A  sweet  familiar  nature,  stealing  in 

As  a  dog  might,  or  child,  to  touch  your  hand 

Or  pluck  your  gown,  and  humbly  mind  you  so 

Of  presence  and  aifection. 

This  is,  at  best,  cool  and  qualified  commendation ; 
but,  a  few  pages  on,  she  drops  the  flippant  air,  and 
writes  with  lyric  ecstasy. 

I  learnt  to  love  that  England.     Very  oft, 
Before  the  day  was  born,  or  otherwise 
Through  secret  windings  of  the  afternoons, 
I  threw  my  hunters  off  and  plunged  myself 
Among  the  deep  hills,  as  a  hunted  stag 
Will  take  the  waters,  shivering  with  the  fear 
And  passion  of  the  course.     And  when,  at  last 
Escaped — so  many  a  green  slope  built  on  slope 
Betwixt  me  and  the  enemy's  house  behind — 
I  dared  to  rest  or  wander — like  a  rest 
Made  sweeter  for  the  step  upon  the  grass — 
And  view  the  ground's  most  gentle  dimplement 
(As  if  God's  finger  touched,  but  did  not  press 
In  making  England!),  such  an  up  and  down 
Of  verdure — nothing  too  much  up  or  down, 
A  ripple  of  land ;  such  little  hills,  the  sky 
Can  stoop  to  tenderly,  and  the  wheatfields  climb  ; 
Such  nooks  of  valleys,  lined  with  orchises, 
Fed  full  of  noises  by  invisible  streams  ; 


English  Landscape.  117 

And  open  pastures,  where  you  scarcely  tell 
White  daisies  from  white  dew,  at  intervals 
The  mythic  oaks  and  elm-trees  standing  out 
Self-poised  upon  their  prodigy  of  shade — 
I  thought  my  father's  land  was  worthy,  too, 
Of  being  my  Shakespeare's. 

Walking  in  such  scenes  with  Cousin  Komney  and  his 
friend  the  rising  painter,  Vincent  Carrington,  Aurora 
would  be  the  gayest  of  the  party,  telling  her  cousin, 
when  he  sighed  about  the  distresses  of  the  poor,  that 
howsoever  the  world  might  go  ill,  "the  thrushes  still 
sang  in  it."  He  bore  with  her  "  in  melancholy 
patience,  not  unkind; "  and  thus  encouraged,  she 
sketched  the  bright  side  of  things  with  a  warmth  of 
colour  which,  if  it  will  not  convince  many  that  fever, 
cancer,  madness,  pestilence,  or  starvation  are  evils  to 
be  vanquished  by  songs  and  smiles,  must  have  been 
charming  to  Bomney,  and  is  charming  to  us. 

I  flattered  all  the  beauteous  country  round, 
As  poets  use,  the  skies,  the  clouds,  the  fields, 
The  happy  violets  hiding  from  the  roads, 
The  primroses  run  down  to,  carrying  gold, — 
The  tangled  hedgerows,  where  the  cows  push  out 
Impatient  horns  and  tolerant  churning  mouths 
'Twixt  dripping  ash-boughs, — hedges  all  alive 
With  birds,  and  gnats,  and  large  white  butterflies, 
Which  look  as  if  the  May-flower  had  caught  life 
And  palpitated  forth  upon  the  wind, — 
Hills,  vales,  woods,  netted  in  a  silver  mist, 
Farms,  granges,  doubled  up  among  the  hills, 
And  cattle  grazing  in  the  watered  vales, 
And  cottage-chimneys  smoking  from  the  woods, 
And  cottage-gardens  smelling  everywhere, 
Confused  with  smell  of  orchards. 


118  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

These  descriptions  of  English  landscape  have  not 
the  minute  elaboration  of  Tennyson,  nor  the  vague 
sympathy,  partly  mystical,  partly  pantheistic,  with 
nature,  of  Wordsworth,  but  they  evince  an  unaffected 
heartiness,  a  buoyancy  of  loving  joy,  which  neither 
Tennyson  nor  Wordsworth  can  rival.  Cowper  was  as 
honest  in  his  affection  for  English  landscape — and 
Cowper  was  a  very  masterly  describer, — but  the  move- 
ment of  his  genius  was  slower,  his  fancy  less  brilliant, 
his  imagination  less  powerful,  his  sense  of  melody  and 
rhythm  in  words  feebler,  than  Mrs.  Browning's.  In 
melodious  word-painting  of  English  lowland  country, 
she  is  unrivalled. 

One  morning,  Aurora,  gambolling  like  a  Dryad 
among  trees  and  flowers,  had  just  selected  for  herself 
an  ivy- wreath  to  bind  across  her  brow,  when  she  was 
aware  of  "  Cousin  Komney."  It  was  her  birthday, 
and  he  had  come  presumably  to  congratulate  her  on 
the  occasion.  He  had  something  more  to  say,  how- 
ever, and  he  edged  towards  his  purpose  by  telling 
Aurora  that  he  had  found,  beside  the  stream,  a  book 
of  hers — a  book  of  poems.  He  had,  he  said,  not  read 
a  word  of  it,  but  he  nevertheless  took  the  liberty  to 
advise  her  to  forswear  poetical  composition.  They 
chatted  lightly  on  this  subject  for  a  few  moments, 
when  he  suddenly  said,  "  Aurora  !  "  There  must  have 
been  something  significant  in  the  tone,  for  girls  are 
not  usually  startled  when  their  cousins  call  them  by 
their  names ;  and  yet,  says  our  heroine,  "  there  I 
stopped  short,  breath  and  all."  Komney  thereupon 


A  Strange  Wooer.  119 


kindly  but  long-windedly  proposed  that  his  cousin 
should  give  up  poetry  and  take  to  world-regeneration 
instead,  with  him  for  guide,  philosopher,  and  hushand. 
His  allusion  to  her  poetry,  which,  remember,  he  had 
not  been  curious  enough  to  read  (Aurora,  if  at  all 
like  other  girls  and  boys  that  write  verses,  would 
have  pardoned  him  a  good  deal  of  boldness  in  doing 
that),  is  not  felicitous. 

T|ae  chances  are  that,  being  a  woman,  young 
And  pure,  with  such  a  pair  of  large,  calm  eyes, 
You  write  as  well,  and  ill,  upon  the  whole, 
As  other  women.     If  as  weh1,  what  then  ? 
If  even  a  little  better  still,  what  then  ? 

In  the  second  book  or  canto  of  a  poem-novel,  the 
hero  maybe  expected  to  be  almost  impossibly  maladroit ; 
but  I  hope,  for  the  honour  of  mankind,  that  no  actual 
human  being  has  ever  been  capable  of  anything  so 
stupid  as  this.  Eomney  proceeds  to  demonstrate  to 
Aurora  that  women  have  no  serious  chance  of  doing 
good  except  by  helping  men  to  do  it,  explaining  to  his 
cousin  her  constitutional  incapacity  to  attain  high 
excellence  with  a  glibness  which  might  have  fitted  him 
to  become  an  efficient  lecturer  against  woman's  rights. 
Hear  him  on  woman's  bondage  to  personal  feeling. 

You  generalise, 

Oh,  nothing  !  not  even  grief!     Your  quick-breathed  hearts, 
So  sympathetic  to  the  personal  pang, 
Close  on  each  separate  knife-stroke,  yielding  up 
A  whole  life  at  each  wound,  incapable 
Of  deepening,  widening  a  large  lap  of  life 
To  hold  the  world-full  woe.     The  human  race 
To  you  means  such  a  child,  or  such  a  man, 


120  Elizabeth  Barrett  Broioning. 


You  saw  one  morning  waiting  in  the  cold, 
Beside  that  gate,  perhaps.     You  gather  up 
A  few  such  cases,  and,  when  strong,  sometimes 
Will  write  of  factories  and  of  slaves,  as  if 
Your  father  were  a  negro,  and  your  son 
A  spinner  in  the  miUs. 

He  goes  on,  in  a  long-winded  manner,  to  infer  that, 
when  the  woes  of  communities  have  to  be  dealt  with, 
women  are  necessarily  weak.  The  world — the  general 
body  of  mankind — remains  uncomprehended  by  them, 
and  must  remain  uninfluenced.  Women  'may  be 
doting  mothers,  good  wives,  but  they  cannot  save 
nations,  or  write  true  poems.  Pausing  in  his 
harangue,  he  lets  his  cousin  speak  five  words,  and 
then  starts  again,  entreating  her,  since  she  is  fit  for 
better  things,  such  as  marrying  him,  not  "to  play  at 
art,  as  children  play  at  swords."  With  delicate  face- 
tiousness,  he  puts  himself  in  the  position  of  a  critic 
reviewing  Aurora's  poems. 

Oh,  excellent ! 

What  grace  !  what  facile  terms  !  what  fluent  sweeps ! 

What  delicate  discernment— almost  thought ! 

The  book  does  honour  to  the  sex,  we  hold. 

Among  our  female  authors  we  make  room 

For  this  fair  writer,  and  congratulate 

The  country  that  produces  in  these  times 

Such  women,  competent  to — spell. 

It  is  a  grave  objection  to  the  poem  that  these  words 
are  put  into  the  mouth  of  a  proposing  lover.  Such 
violation  of  probability  exceeds  the  utmost  licence 
permissible  to  art.  Romney  Leigh  is  not,  in  my 
opinion,  a  happily  conceived  figure.  The  character  is 
such  as,  outside  the  circles  of  amiable  and  interesting 


JRomney  Leigh.  121 


lunacy,  can  hardly  be  supposed  to  exist.  It  is  at  best 
a  type  of  nineteenth-century  enthusiasm,  not  of  per- 
manent human  nature.  But  I  am  not  sure  that 
anything  in  the  delineation  of  Eomney  violates  pro- 
bability quite  so  harshly — and  his  career  trenches  on 
probability  at  several  points — as  his  prefacing  an  offer 
of  his  hand  to  Aurora  with  a  ponderous  argument  that 
her  sex  is  incapable  and  herself  a  goose.  With  a  sense 
of  relief,  we  find  at  last  that  she  cuts  short  his  oration. 

"  Stop  there  !" 

I  answered — burning  through  his  thread  of  talk 
With  a  quick  flame  of  emotion. 

She  tells  him  that  she  does  not  want  praise,  that  she 
would  rather  dance  on  the  tight-rope  to  amuse  chil- 
dren at  fairs,  than  write  verse  for  men  in  a  frivolous 
spirit.  He  breaks  in  again  to  ask  her  to  choose 
nobler  work  in  marrying  him,  and  expatiates  on  the 
miseries  that  call  for  alleviation.  She  reminds  him 
sharply  that  he  has  been  demonstrating  to  her  that 
women  are  unfit  for  the  work  of  social  improvement, 
and  would  like  to  know  how,  if  she  is  too  weak  to 
stand  alone,  she  can  bear  him  leaning  on  her  shoulder. 
This  makes  him  speak  rather  more  civilly. 

"  Aurora,  dear, 

And  dearly  honoured  " — he  pressed  in  at  once 
With  eager  utterance — "  you  translate  me  ill. 
I  do  not  contradict  my  thought  of  you, 
Which  is  most  reverent,  with  another  thought 
Found  less  so.     If  your  sex  is  weak  for  art 
(And  I  who  said  so,  did  but  honour  you, 
By  using  truth  in  courtship),  it  is  strong 
For  life  and  duty." 


122  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

The  apology  will  not  stand  examination.  He  had 
pronounced  women  incapable  of  generalisation  in  any 
form,  and  he  was  logically  bound  to  affirm  that  her 
strength  for  life  and  duty  could  be  manifested  only  in 
so  far  as  she  strengthened  him  for  undertakings  to 
which  men  alone  are  competent.  This  Aurora  per- 
ceives;  and  replies  to  his  offer  of  his  hand,  that  he 
loves  "  not  a  woman,  but  a  cause  ; "  his  wife  was  to  be 
a  helpmate, — not  an  end  in  herself. 

"  Your  cause  is  noble,  your  ends  excellent, 
But  I,  being  most  unworthy  of  these  and  that, 
Do  otherwise  conceive  of  love.     Farewell." 

He  continues  to  plead.  Making  more  amends  for 
his  disparagement  of  her  sex,  he  informs  her,  rather 
to  our  surprise,  that  he  holds  "  the  woman  to  be 
nobler  than  the  man."  Women  can  love  better  than 
men  can,  and  love  "  generates  the  likeness  of  itself 
through  all  heroic  duties."  Still,  the  nobleness  of 
woman  is  to  find  scope  only  through  her  love  for  man, 
and  Aurora  will  not  accept  this  condition  of  being 
useful.  She  has  her  duty,  she  tells  him,  as  well  as  he, 
a  duty  which  she  can  perform,  though  unmarried.  As 
a  poet,  she  works  in  the  ideal;  and  life,  she  insists, 
would  become  vile  and  despicable  unless  men  were 
taught  by  poets  to  aspire  to  the  ideal.  He  may  scorn 
her  art,  but  she  loves  it,  and  will  cling  to  it.  Presently 
their  aunt  appears,  and  bids  Aurora  ask  Komney  to 
finish  the  talk  indoors.  He  answers  for  her  that  his 
cousin  has  dismissed  him,  and  abruptly  takes  leave. 
To  her  aunt,  looking  for  explanation,  Aurora  says 


An  Explanation.  123 


bitterly  that  lie  had  come  to  take  her  "  into  service  as 
a  wife,"  and  that  she  had  refused  him.  An  important 
conversation  between  aunt  and  niece  ensues,  and  we 
are  favoured  with  information  which  throws  light  upon 
the  character  of  the  former  and  upon  the  prospects  of 
the  latter. 

The  aunt  explains  that,  if  not  from  the  point  of 
view  of  romantic  eighteen,  yet  from  that  of  sober  and 
judicious  fifty-five,  there  were  powerful  arguments  in 
favour  of  Bomney's  proposal.  Were  she,  the  aunt,  to 
die,  Aurora  would  be  destitute. 

Without  a  right  to  crop 
A  single  blade  of  grass  beneath  these  trees, 
Or  cast  a  lamb's  small  shadow  on  the  lawn, 
Unfed,  unfolded. 

Her  father's  Italian  marriage  had  cost  his  daughter 
her  inheritance.  By  a  clause  in  the  entail  excluding 
offspring  by  a  foreign  wife,  the  estates  passed  to 
Eomney  Leigh.  But  Vane  Leigh,  Komney's  father, 
aware  of  this,  had  written  to  Aurora's  father,  so  soon 
as  he  heard  that  a  daughter  was  born  to  him,  asking  the 
child  in  marriage  for  his  son.  This  letter  may  be  sup- 
posed to  have  set  the  father's  mind  at  rest,  and  there 
the  matter  had  been  left ;  but  now,  if  the  girl  in  her 
wilfulness  turned  from  Komney,  she  would  not  only 
bring  poverty  on  herself,  but  defeat  the  family  plans. 
What,  asked  the  aunt,  would  she  be  at  ? 

You  must  have 

A  pattern  lover  sighing  on  his  knee : 
You  do  not  count  enough  a  noble  heart, 


124  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

Above  book-patterns,  which  this  very  morn 
Unclosed  itself,  in  two  dear  father's  names, 
To  embrace  your  orphaned  life !  fie,  fie  !     But  stay, 
I  write  a  word,  and  counteract  this  sin. 

Aurora  entreats  her,  with  passionate  earnestness,  to 
do  nothing  of  the  kind.  Her  soul  at  least,  she  says,  is 
not  a  pauper;  she  can  live  her  soul's  life  without  alms, 
and  if  she  must  die  in  making  the  attempt,  she  is  not 
afraid  to  die.  What  could  a  prosaic  old  lady  say  to 
a  poetical  young  niece  in  this  frame  of  mind?  It 
turns  out  that  the  aunt  knows  the  time  of  day  with 
remarkable  accuracy. 

She  seized  my  hands  with  both  hers,  strained  them  fast, 

And  drew  her.  probing  and  unscrupulous  eyes 

Eight  through  me,  body  and  heart.     "Yet,  foolish  Sweet,   . 

You  love  this  man.     I  have  watched  you  when  he  came, 

And  when  he  went,  and  when  we've  talked  of  him  : 

I  am  not  old  for  nothing  ;  I  can  tell 

The  weather-signs  of  love — you  love  this  man." 

Who  would  have  thought  that  the  venerable  maiden 
had  so  much  wit  in  her  !  A  burning  blush  upon  Aurora's 
cheek  and  brow  witnesses  to  the  correctness  of  her 
observation  ;  but  the  girl  loudly  accuses  the  blush  of 

treason  and  falsehood. 

I  attest 

The  conscious  skies,  and  all  their  daily  suns, 
I  think  I  loved  him  not,  nor  then,  nor  since, 
Nor  ever.     Do  we  love  the  schoolmaster, 
Being  busy  in  the  woods  ?  much  less,  being  poor, 
The  overseer  of  the  parish  ?     Do  we  keep 
Our  love  to  pay  our  debts  with  ? 

She  then  becomes  so  violent  that  her  aunt  drops  her 
hands  and  ceases  to  smile. 


Authorship.  125 


"  We'll  leave  Italian  manners,  if  you  please. 
I  think  you  had  an  English  father,  child, 
And  ought  to  find  it  possible  to  speak 
A  quiet  '  yes '  or  '  no  '  like  English  girls, 
Without  convulsions.     In  another  month 
We'll  take  another  answer     .     .     .     no,  or  yes." 
With  that,  she  left  me  in  the  garden  walk. 

When  a  month  had  gone  by,  all  was  changed.  The 
aunt  had  died  suddenly,  leaving  Aurora  her  furniture 
and  three  hundred  pounds.  Romney  vainly  tries  to 
convince  his  cousin  that  her  legacy  was  thirty  thou- 
sand pounds,  which  sum  he  had  intended  to  present 
to  his  aunt,  with  a  view  to  its  being  left  to  Aurora. 
They  part.  She  betakes  herself  to  London,  trusting 
to  her  pen  for  a  livelihood,  and  soon  makes  her  way,  if 
not  to  fortune,  at  least  to  fame.  We  are  favoured  with 
samples  of  the  criticism  published  upon  her  writings. 

My  critic  Hammond  flatters  prettily, 
And  wants  another  volume  like  the  last. 
My  critic  Belfair  wants  another  book 
Entirely  different,  which  will  sell  (and  live  ?) 
A  striking  book,  yet  not  a  startling  book, 
The  public  blames  originalities, 
(You  must  not  pump  spring-water  unawares 
Upon  a  gracious  public,  full  of  nerves — ) 
Good  things,  not  subtle,  new  yet  orthodox, 
As  easy  reading  as  the  dog-eared  page 
That's  fingered  by  said  public,  fifty  years, 
Since  first  taught  spelling  by  its  grandmother, 
And  yet  a  revelation  in  some  sort ! 
That's  hard,  my  critic  Belfair  ! 

The  criticism  of  Belfair  is  one  which  in  substance 
has  been  probably  made  oftener  than  any  other  on  the 
works  both  of  Mrs.  Browning  and  Mr.  Browning. 


126  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

It  is  indeed  difficult — more  difficult  in  the  present  day 
than  it  ever  was  before,  on  account  of  the  enormous 
amount  of  passably  good  literature — to  be  original 
without  being  extravagant,  to  attract  by  sheer  weight 
or  worth  of  matter,  presented  with  classic  quietness 
of  style,  instead  of  by  some  "trick  of  singularity." 
But  it  remains  a  truth  of  universal  application 
that  mannerism,  obscurity,  eccentricity  are  notes, 
at  best,  of  genius  of  the  second  order,  and  that 
simplicity  and  clearness  are  notes  of  genius  of  the 
first. 

Seven  years  had  come  and  gone.  The  life  in  the 
country,  which  had  at  times  been  irksome  when 
Aurora's  aunt  pressed  on  her  with  her  rules  and  re- 
strictions, had  begun  to  grow  dear  to  memory,  with 
mellow  radiance  in  the  lights  and  softness  in  the 
shadows.  Any  friend  who  could  recall  to  her  mind 
little  matters  of  that  time  was  welcome. 

A  hedgehog  in  the  path,  or  a  lame  bird 

In  those  green  country  walks,  in  that  good  time, 

When  certainly  I  was  so  miserable, 

I  seem  to  have  missed  a  blessing  ever  since. 

She  worked  in  a  chamber  up  three  flights  of  stairs, 
and  found  the  smoky  sunsets  and  weltering  fogs  of 
London  not  unpropitious  to  poetical  composition. 

.*> 

I  worked  the  short  days  out, — and  watched  the  sun 

On  lurid  morns  or  monstrous  afternoons, 

Like  some  Druidic  idol's  fiery  brass, 

With  fixed  unflickering  outline  of  dead  heat, 

In  which  the  blood  of  wretches  pent  inside 

Seemed  oozing  forth  to  incarnadine  the  air, — 


Lady  Waldemar.  127 


Push  out  through  fog  with  his  dilated  disc, 
And  startle  the  slant  roofs  and  chimney-pots 
With  splashes  of  fierce  colour. 

She  "  worked  with  patience,  which  is  almost  power." 
Being  poor,  she  was  "  constrained,  for  life,  to  work 
with  one  hand  for  the  booksellers,"  while  working 
with  the  other  for  herself  and  art.  She  wrote  for 
cyclopaedias,  magazines,  reviews,  weekly  papers. 

I  wrote  tales  beside, 

Carved  many  an  article  on  cherry-stones 
To  suit  light  readers, — something  in  the  lines 
Eevealing,  it  was  said,  the  mallet-hand, 
But  that,  I'll  never  vouch  for.     What  you  do 
For  bread,  will  taste  of  common  grain,  not  grapes, 
Although  you  have  a  vineyard  in  Champagne. 

She  became  known,  and  great  folks  asked  her  to 
their  entertainments,  to  do  service  in  capacity  of 
lioness. 

One  day  an  extremely  aristocratic  person  found  her 
way  up  the  three  pairs  of  stairs,  and  announced  her- 
self as  Lady  Waldemar.  She  is  described  as  typical 
of  high-born  English  dames,  gentle  because  so  proud, 
too  high  above  the  common  world  to  be  put  out 
by  anything  in  it,  with  low  voice  and  gracious  and 
conciliating  manner.  We  are  privileged  to  listen  to  a 
protracted  conversation  between  her  and  Aurora.  Her 
ladyship  announces  that  she  is  in*  love  with  Komney 
Leigh.  Her  first  husband  had  died  while  she  was 
still  young,  and  she  might  marry  a  marquis  when  she 
chose,  but  Eomney  Leigh's  name  was  good,  his  means 
were  excellent,  and  in  fact  she  was  as  mad  with  love 


128  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

as  he  was  with  philanthropy.  Then  follows  a  passage 
which  I  should  be  very  sorry  to  consider  a  successful 
imitation  of  the  talk  of  English  ladies  in  the  rank  of 
Lady  Waldemar.  A  critic  is  bound  to  show  his  author 
at  the  worst,  or  nearly  at  the  worst,  as  well  as  at  what 
he  deems  the  best,  and  therefore  I  shall  quote  the 
lines.  Lady  Waldemar  speaks. 

Of  a  truth,  Miss  Leigh, 
I  have  not,  without  struggle,  come  to  this. 
I  took  a  master  in  the  German  tongue, 
I  gamed  a  little,  went  to  Paris  twice  ; 
But,  after  all,  this  love  !     You  eat  of  love, 
And  do  as  vile  a  thing  as  if  you  ate 
Of  garlic — which,  whatever  else  you  eat, 
Tastes  uniformly  acrid,  till  your  peach 
Beminds  you  of  your  onion.     Am  I  coarse  ? 
Well,  love's  coarse,  nature's  coarse — ah,  there's  the  rub  ! 
We  fair,  fine  ladies,  who  park  out  our  lives 
From  common  sheep-paths,  cannot  help  the  crows 
From  flying  over — we're  as  natural  still 
As  Blowsalinda.     Drape  us  perfectly 
In  Lyons  velvet, — we  are  not,  for  that, 
Lay-figures,  look  you !  we  have  hearts  within, 
Warm,  live,  improvident,  indecent  hearts, 
As  ready  for  distracted  ends  and  acts 
As  any  distressed  sempstress  of  them  all 
That  Bomney  groans  and  toils  for.     We  catch  love 
And  other  fevers  in  the  vulgar  way. 
Love  will  not  be  outwitted  by  our  wit, 
Nor  outrun  by  our  equipages: — mine 
Persisted,  spite  of  efforts.     All  my  cards 
Turned  up  but  Bornney  Leigh  ;  my  German  stopped 
At  germane  Wertherism  ;  my  Paris  rounds 
Beturned  me  from  the  Champs  Elysees  just 
A  ghost,  and  sighing  like  Dido's.     I  came  home 
Uncured — convicted  rather  to  myself 
Of  being  in  love — in  love !    That's  coarse,  you'll  say. 
I'm  talking  garlic. 


Lady  Waldemar.  129 


No  Englishwoman  who  had  any  pretensions  to  the 
name  of  lady  could  express  herself  in  terms  like  these. 

Lady  Waldemar  proceeds  to  inform  Aurora  that 
Eomney  Leigh  was  about  to  inaugurate  a  new  era 
by  marrying  Marian  Erie,  a  needlewoman,  and  thus 
reconciling  class  to  class.  To  this  match  Lady 
Waldemar  vehemently  objected,  and  her  purpose  in 
visiting  Aurora  was,  she  signified,  to  enlist  her  assist- 
ance in  dissuading  Bomney,  or  the  needlewoman, 
from  the  perpetration  of  such  an  absurdity,  Our 
heroine  refuses  to  interfere,  and  lets  Lady  Waldemar 
know  her  determination  to  this  effect  with  consider- 
able sharpness.  Her  ladyship  makes  her  infer- 
ences, and,  in  retiring,  lets  fly  this  Parthian  shaft 
at  Aurora : 

Farewell,  then.    Write  your  books  in  peace, 
As  far  as  may  be  for  some  secret  stir 
Now  obvious  to  me, — for,  most  obviously, 
In  coming  hither  I  mistook  the  way. 

That  is  to  say,  Lady  Waldemar  formed  the  opinion 
arrived  at  by  Aurora's  aunt  respecting  the  state  of 
that  young  lady's  feelings  towards  her  cousin.  Miss 
Leigh's  conduct  after  Lady  Waldemar  had  gone  was, 
to  say  the  least,  not  inconsistent  with  this  view.  Two 
hours  afterwards  she  has  penetrated  to  St.  Margaret's- 
court,  the  hideous  den,  or  rookery,  in  which  Bomney's 
affianced  bride  was  to  be  found.  There  are  dismal 
places  in  London,  inhabited  by  a  miserable  and  half- 
savage  population ;  but  Mrs.  Browning's  description 
of  St.  Margaret's-^court  is  exaggerated  beyond  all 

9 


130  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

bounds  of  credibility,  and  reads  like  a  caricature  of 
Dickens.  I  shall  quote  part  of  the  passage,  but  with- 
out marking  the  division  into  lines.  Edgar  Poe,  a 
critic  of  fine  discrimination,  proposes,  as  a  sound  test 
of  the  poetical  quality  of  verse,  to  print  it  in  the  form 
of  prose,  and  to  take  note  whether  it  is  melodious  or 
is  not. 

"  Within  St.  Margaret's-court  I  stood  alone,  close- 
veiled.  A  sick  child,  from  an  ague-fit,  whose  wasted 
right  hand  gambled  'gainst  his  left  with  an  old  brass 
button  in  a  blot  of  sun,  jeered  weakly  at  me  as  I 
passed  across  the  uneven  pavement ;  while  a  woman, 
rouged  upon  the  angular  cheek-bones,  kerchief  torn, 
thin  dangling  locks,  and  flat,  lascivious  mouth,  cursed 
at  a  window  both  ways,  in  and  out,  by  turns  some 
bed-rid  creature  and  myself, — '  Lie  still  there, 
mother!  liker  the  dead  dog  you'll  be  to-morrow. 
What,  we  pick  our  way,  fine  madam,  with  those 
damnable  small  feet !  We  cover  up  our  face  from 
doing  good,  as  if  it  were  our  purse !  What  brings 
you  here,  my  lady?  Is't  to  find  my  gentleman  who 
visits  his  tame  pigeon  in  the  eaves  ?  Our  cholera 
catch  you  with  its  cramps  and  spasms,  and  tumble 
up  your  good  clothes,  veil  and  all,  and  turn  your 
whiteness  dead-blue.'  I  looked  up ;  I  think  I  could 
have  walked  through  hell  that  day,  and  never  flinched. 
'  The  dear  Christ  comfort  you,'  I  said,  *  you  must 
have  been  most  miserable  to  be  so  cruel  ' — and  I 
emptied  out  my  purse  upon  the  stones :  when ,  as  I 
had  cast  the  last  charm  in  the  cauldron,  the  whole 


\ 

St.  Margaret's  Court.  131 

court  went  boiling,  bubbling  up,  from  all  its  doors 
and  windows,  with  a  hideous  wail  of  laughs  and  roar 
of  oaths,  and  blows  perhaps.  I  passed  too  quickly  for 
distinguishing,  and  pushed  a  little  side-door  hanging 
on  a  hinge,  and  plunged  into  the  dark,  and  groped  and 
climbed  the  long,  steep,  narrow  stair  'twixt  broken  rail 
and  mildewed  wall  that  let  the  plaster  drop  to  startle 
me  in  the  blackness.  Still,  up,  up !  So  high  lived 
Eomney's  bride." 

I  think  my  readers  will  agree  with  me  that,  if  we 
had  not  seen  this  in  the  form  of  poetry,  we  might  have 
had  some  difficulty  in  distinguishing  it  from  prose. 

Marian  Erie — the  needlewoman  of  St.  Margaret 's- 
court,  whom  Eomney  Leigh  intended  to  marry  for  the 
benefit  of  mankind — was  not  beautiful.  You  could 
not  say  whether  her  complexion  was  white  or  brown 
— it  changed  like  a  mist,  "  according  to  being  shone 
on  more  or  less."  Her  hair  had  the  same  peculiarity 
of  dubious  tint.  It 

Ban  its  opulence  of  curls 

In  doubt  'twixt  dark  and  bright,  nor  left  you  clear 
To  name  the  colour. 

A  small  head,  cheeks  rather  too  thin,  but  dimpled, 
milky  little  teeth,  and  an  infantile  smile,  complete  the 
description  of  Komney's  choice.  That  any  good  in  the 
way  of  social  reconcilement  or  the  elevation  of  the 
masses  could  result  from  such  a  marriage  is  a  thesis 
so  obviously  absurd  that  argument  on  the  subject  were 
thrown  away.  Eomney's  scheme  can  be  accounted  for 

9—2 


132  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

only  on  one  supposition — that  his  extreme  softness  of 
heart  had  resulted  in,  or  had  always  "been  accompanied 
by,  softness  of  head. 

The  character  of  Marian  Erie  is  conceived  on  a 
principle  so  frequently  exemplified  by  Dickens  that 
it  may  be  called  the  principle  of  the  Dickens  ideal. 
The  conditions  of  birth  and  up-bringing  are  depicted 
as  all  but  impossibly  bad,  and  the  human  flower  comes 
up  amid  squalor,  hardship,  and  neglect,  radiantly  pure 
as  a  lily  in  paradise.  Oliver  Twist,  born  in  a  work- 
house, reared  under  the  auspices  of  Noah  Claypole, 
Fagin,  and  the  Dodger,  proves  to  be  a  pattern  of  in- 
destructible goodness.  Marian  Erie,  the  child  of  a 
father  and  a  mother  who  reached  the  utmost  limits  of 
depravity,  grew  up  with  the  qualities  of  an  angel. 
Such  an  occurrence  is  not  impossible.  There  are 
Oliver  Twists  and  Marian  Erles  in  the  world.  But 
ignorance,  poverty,  paternal  and  maternal  wickedness 
and  neglect,  would  be  less  malignant  evils  than  they 
are  if  such  characters,  resisting  evil  as  asbestos  resists 
fire,  were  not  very  uncommon  ;  and  it  is  generally  felt 
that,  in  poems  and  novels,  these  immaculate  person- 
ages are  mere  lay-figures,  like  the  shepherds  and 
shepherdesses  of  the  stage,  in  whose  delineation  no 
very  shrewd  or  searching  knowledge  of  human  nature 
is  displayed. 

Marian  Erie  was  born  upon  "  the  ledge  of  Malvern 
Hill  to  eastward,  in  a  hut,  built  up  at  night  to  evade 
the  landlord's  eye,  of  mud  and  turf."  Her  father  did 
random  jobs  which  steadier  workmen  despised,  looked 


Marian's  Parents.  133 

after  swine  on  commons,  picked  hops,  assisted  Welsh 

horse-dealers 

When  a  drove 

Of  startled  horses  plunged  into  the  mist 
Below  the  mountain-road,  and  sowed  the  wind 
With  wandering  neighings. 

He  drank,  slept,  cursed  his  wife  when  there  was  no 
money  to  buy  drink;  and  the  woman  "  heat  her  baby 
in  revenge  for  her  own  broken  heart."  The  little  girl 
picked  up  some  knowledge  at  a  Sunday-school,  and 
felt  vaguely  that  there  was  "  some  grand  blind  love" 
in  the  heavens  when  the  sun  dazzled  her  eyes.  One 
day  her  mother,  who  had  just  been  badly  beaten,  tried 
to  introduca  her  to  a  life  of  infamy.  Shrieking  with 
horror,  she  started  away  and  bounded  down  the  hill- 
side. 

They  yelled  at  her, 

As  famished  hounds  at  a  hare.     She  heard  them  yell, 
She  felt  her  name  hiss  after  her  from  the  hills, 
Like  shot  from  guns.     On,  on.     And  now  she  had  cast 
The  voices  off  with  the  uplands.     On.     Mad  fear 
Was  running  in  her  feet  and  killing  the  ground ; 
The  white  roads  curled  as  if  she  burnt  them  up, 
The  green  fields  melted,  wayside  trees  fell  back 
To  make  room  for  her.     Then  her  head  grew  vexed, 
Trees,  fields,  turned  on  her,  and  ran  after  her ; 
She  heard  the  quick  pants  of  the  hills  behind. 
The  keen  air  pricked  her  neck.     She  had  lost  her  feet, 
Could  run  no  "more,  yet,  somehow,  went  as  fast — 
The  horizon,  red  'twixt  steeples  in  the  east, 
So  sucked  her  forward,  forward,  while  her  heart 
Kept  swelling,  swelling,  till  it  swelled  so  big 
It  seemed  to  fill  her  body ;  then  it  burst, 
And  overflowed  the  world^and  swamped  the  light, 
"  And  now  I  am  dead  and  safe,"  thought  Marian  Erie — 
She  had  dropped,  she  had  fainted. 


134  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

Marian  never  saw  her  mother  again.  Picked  out  of 
a  ditch  by  a  passing  waggoner,  she  was  carried  to  a 
hospital  in  London.  That  was  exactly  the  kind  of 
place  in  which  she  was  likely  to  fall  under  the  notice 
of  Konmey  Leigh.  It  would  not  have  been  easy  for 
him  to  go  lower  in  the  social  scale  in  order  to  find  a 
bride  who,  as  his  wife,  might  represent  the  common 
people  standing  on  a  level  of  perfect  equality  with  the 
ladies  and  gentlemen  of  England.  The  marriage  was 
to  be  celebrated  in  the  aristocratic  chapel  of  St. 
James's.  Eomney  Leigh  invited  a  brilliant  circle 
of  peers,  peeresses,  and  leaders  in  society  to  witness 
the  ceremony,  not  forgetting  to  ask  Marian's  fellow- 
inmates  of  St.  Margaret 's-court  to  grace  the  wedding, 
and  feast  thereafter  on  Hampstead-heath.  Under 
these  circumstances,  the  party  assembled  in  the 
church  was  of  a  very  unusual  kind. 

Of  course  the  people  came  in  uncompelled, 

Lame,  blind,  and  worse — sick,  sorrowful,  and  worse, 

The  humours  of  the  peccant  social  wound 

All  pressed  out,  poured  out  upon  Pimlico, 

Exasperating  the  unaccustomed  air 

With  hideous  interfusion  :  you'd  suppose 

A  finished  generation,  dead  of  plague, 

Swept  outward  from  their  graves  into  the  sun, 

The  moil  of  death  upon  them.     What  a  sight ! 

A  holiday  of  miserable  men 

Is  sadder  than  a  burial-day  of  kings. 

They  clogged  the  streets,  they  oozed  into  the  church 

In  a  dark,  slow  stream,  like  blood.     To  see  that  sight, 

The  noble  ladies  stood  up  in  their  pews, 

Some  pale  from  fear,  a  few  as  red  for  hate, 

Some  simply  curious,  some  just  insolent. 


The  Wedding  Guests.  135 

And  some  in  wondering  scorn,  "  What  next  ?  What  next?  " 

These  crushed  their  delicate  rose-lips  from  the  smile 

That  misbecame  them  in  a  holy  place, 

With  broidered  hems  of  perfumed  handkerchiefs ; 

Those  passed  the  salts  with  confidence  of  eyes 

And  simultaneous  shiver  of  moire  silk  ; 

While  all  the  aisles,  alive  and  black  with  heads, 

Crawled  slowly  toward  the  altar  from  the  street, 

As  bruised  snakes  crawl  and  hiss  out  of  a  hole 

With  shuddering  involutions,  swaying  slow 

From  right  to  left,  and  then  from  left  to  right, 

In  pants  and  pauses.     What  an  ugly  crest 

Of  faces  rose  upon  you  everywhere 

From  that  crammed  mass !     You  did  not  usually 

See  faces  like  them  in  the  open  day  : 

They  hide  in  cellars,  not  to  make  you  mad 

As  Komney  Leigh  is. — Faces !     O  my  God, 

We  call  those,  faces  ?  Men's  and  women's,  ay, 

And  children's  ;  babies,  hanging  like  a  rag 

Forgotten  on  their  mother's  neck — poor  mouths, 

Wiped  clean  of  mother's  milk  by  mother's  blow, 

Before  they  are  taught  her  cursing. 

It  is  not  without  rather  severe  disappointment  that 
on  examining  Aurora  Leigh  with  more  care  and 
closeness  than  I  had  brought  to  the  task  for  many 
years,  I  have  found  the  poem  so  much  more  faulty 
than  previous  readings  led  me  to  expect.  The 
metaphoric  richness,  the  wealth  of  picturesque  phrase 
and  coloured  word,  the  animation,  and  even,  on  the 
whole,  the  melody,  of  Aurora  Leigh  are  heyond  praise. 
But  it  lacks  modulation,  variety,  repose.  There  are, 
indeed,  passages  in  which  the  thoughts  and  images 
fairly  float  themselves  away  in  the  sphere-dance  of 
harmony ;  wonderful  passages,  in  which  it  is  again 
demonstrated  that  true  melody  in  language  is  but  the 


136  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

rhythmic  cadence  natural  to  a  mood  of  imaginative 
thought,  sufficiently  elevated,  calm,  and  mighty.  But 
over  wide  spaces  of  the  poem  the  ear  finds  no  delight. 
The  crowding,  the  vehemence,  the  feverish  haste  and 
impatience,  which  so  frequently  characterise  Mr. 
Kingsley's  novels,  can  hardly  fail  to  be  recalled  by 
many  passages.  The  heroine  invariably  talks  like 
one  of  Mr.  Kingsley's  characters.  There  is  a  lack 
of  tenderer  strains  to  refresh  and  relieve  the  ear; 
the  atmosphere  wants  calm,  the  landscape  wants  per- 
spective. 

But  it  is  with  the  poorness  of  the  human  element 
throughout  the  poem  that  I  have,  in  the  last  reading, 
been  most  painfully  impressed.  I  am  indeed  not  so 
sure  as  I  once  was  that  Bomney  Leigh  could  not 
have  existed.  He  had  a  bee  in  his  bonnet,  but  genius 
may  be  combined  with  almost  lunatic  unpracticality. 
But  Marian  Erie  is  a  fancy  portrait,  and  Lady  Walde- 
mar  is  an  impossibility.  The  only  personages  in 
the  poem  whose  existences  are  thoroughly  realised 
are  Aurora  and  the  aunt.  Agreeable  or  disagreeable, 
Aurora  has  poetic  vitality.  Mrs.  Browning  made  use, 
without  question,  of  her  own  experiences,  in  deline- 
ating the  successful  authoress  ;  and  though  we  cannot 
impute  to  Aurora  the  high  qualities  of  Mrs.  Brown- 
ing, or  to  Mrs.  Browning  the  flightiness  and  flip- 
pancy and  tone  of  conventional  satire  of  her  heroine, 
there  are  unmistakable  traits  of  reality  in  the  girl. 
The  aunt,  too,  is  a  typical  English  lady  of  a  certain 
class,  and  might,  with  more  patient  finish  and  more 


Defects  of  "Aurora  Leigh."  137 

tender  and  intelligent  sympathy,  have  been  a  lovely 
figure.  But  Marian  Erie  has  no  life  that  we  can 
call  her  own.  She  is,  and  does,  what  the  poet- 
novelist  wants,  neither  more  nor  less,  exactly  as  a 
woman  of  wood,  in  an  artist's  studio,  wears  black  or 
white,  red  or  green,  a  widow's  cap  or  a  huntress's 
feather,  according  to  the  painter's  design  and  grouping. 
Lady  Waldemar  is  not  only  an  extravagant  caricature 
of  aristocratic  coarseness  in  speech,  but  superficial 
and  incorrect  as  a  study  of  human  nature.  It  was 
most  unlikely  that  she  should  have  fallen  in  love  with 
such  a  man  as  Bomney  Leigh,  yet  a  woman's 
freakishness  may  account  for  that ;  but  has  a  clever, 
unprincipled,  strong-willed,  intriguing  woman  no 
cunning?  Could  Lady  Waldemar  have  been  so 
childishly  maladroit  and  indelicate,  as  to  let  both 
Aurora  and  Marian  into  the  secret  of  her  love  ?  In 
real  life  such  an  one  as  Lady  Waldemar  would  be  the 
last  person  in  the  world  to  wear  her  heart  upon  her 
sleeve. 

If  the  individuals  described  in  the  poem  yield  so 
little  satisfaction',  the  classes  described  make  no 
amends.  Mrs.  Browning  fails  both  with  the  aristocracy 
and  with  the  poor.  We  have  seen  her  account  of  the 
reception  met  with  by  Aurora  when  she  visited  Marian 
Erie  in  St.  Margaret's-court,  and  her  description  of 
the  crowd  of  poor  people  assembled  in  the  chapel  of 
St.  James's  to  see  Komney  Leigh  wed  his  plebeian 
bride.  That  Aurora  should  have  been  insulted  in 
entering  a  house  in  St.  Margaret's-court  is  of  course 


138  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

possible ;  but  I  think  that  all  who  have  engaged  in 
visiting  the  poor  in  their  own  dwellings  will  admit  that 
such  an  occurrence  is  in  a  high  degree  improbable.  It 
cannot  be  said  of  the  English  poor  that  they  are  slow 
to  recognise  the  wish  to  do  them  good,  or  to  recipro- 
cate kindly  feeling.  The  hideous  badness,  the  rabid 
ill-temper,  attributed  to  the  crowd  that  went  from  St. 
Giles's  to  see  Marian  Erie  married  to  Romney  Leigh, 
prove  that  Mrs.  Browning  had  no  real  knowledge  of 
the  London  poor.  Romney  Leigh,  a  gentleman  of 
birth  and  wealth,  spending  his  money  for  the  benefit 
of  the  destitute  and  miserable,  and  proposing  to  show 
his  sense  of  the  brotherhood  of  humanity  by  marrying 
a  needlewoman,  would  have  been  the  darling  of  the 
multitude.  They  would  have  thought  him  a  fool,  but 
would  have  loved  him  for  all  that.  Instead  of  coming 
to  the  wedding  in  foul  rags,  they  would  have  come  in 
the  best  things  they  could  buy,  beg,  or  borrow.  They 
and  their  babies  would  have  been  well  washed  at 
least ; .  their  faces  would  have  been  as  red  as  cherries 
or  strawberries  with  satisfaction  and  jollity ;  their 
temper  would  have  been  in  a  state  of  radiant  good- 
ness, not  only  on  account  of  the  delightful  wedding 
and  the  expected  feast,  but  from  that  appreciation  of 
the  humour  of  the  whole  affair  which  a  London 
crowd  would  assuredly  have,  displayed.  Had  such  a 
celebration  as  the  marriage  of  Romney  Leigh  and 
Marian  Erie  ever  taken  place,  the  appearance  of  the 
crowd  would  most  certainly  have  suggested  to  no  one 
that  "  you  had  stirred  up  hell  to  heave  its  lowest  dreg 


Aristocratic  Talk.  139 

fiends  uppermost."  The  absence  of  the  element  of 
humour  in  Mrs.  Browning's  mental  composition  is 
painfully  conspicuous  in  these  delineations,  and  is 
indeed  fatal  to  their  success. 

So  much  for  the  class  represented  in  this  marriage 
on  the  side  of  Marian  Erie.  Now  for  the  class  repre- 
sented by  Bomney  Leigh.  Aurora  was  placed  by  the 
bridegroom  beside  the  altar-stair,  "  where  he  and 
other  noble  gentlemen  and  high-born  ladies  waited 
for  the  bride."  Noble  gentleman  and  high-born 
ladies,  the  friends  of  Eomney  Leigh,  ought  to  have 
been  favourable  representatives  of  the  English 
aristocracy.  Some  of  them,  however,  had  been  asked 
to  be  present  by  Lady  Waldemar,  and  the  reader  can 
make  what  allowance  he  pleases  for  their  talk  on 
that  account.  Let  us  take  a  sample  of  it. 

It  was  early  :  there  was  time 
For  greeting  and  the  morning's  compliment ; 
And  gradually  a  ripple  of  women's  talk 
Arose  and  fell,  and  tossed  about  a  spray 
Of  English  s's,  soft  as  a  silent  hush, 
And,  notwithstanding,  quite  as  audible 
As  louder  phrases  thrown  out  by  the  men. 
— "  Yes,  really,  if  we've  need  to  wait  in  church, 
We've  need  to  talk  there."—"  She  ?     'Tis  Lady  Ayr, 
In  blue — not  purple  !  that's  the  dowager." 
— "  She  looks  as  young." — "  She  flirts  as  young,  you  mean. 
Why,  if  you  had  seen  her  upon  Thursday  night, 
You'd  call  Miss  Norris  modest."—"  You  again  ! 
I  waltzed  with  you  three  hours  back.     Up  at  six, 
Up  still  at  ten  :  scarce  time  to  change  one's  shoes. 
I  feel  as  white  and  sulky  as  a  ghost, 
So  pray  don't  speak  to  me,  Lord  Belcher." — "  No, 
I'll  look  at  you  instead,  and  it's  enough 


140  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

While  you  have  that  face."     "  In  church,  my  lord  !  fie,  fie  I  " 
"  Adair,  you  stayed  for  the  Division  ?  " — "  Lost 
By  one."     "  The  devil  it  is  !     I'm  sorry  for  't. 

And  if  I  had  not  promised  Mrs.  Grove " 

"  You  might  have  kept  your  word  to  Liverpool." 

"  Constituents  must  remember,  after  all, 

We're  mortal." — "  We  remind  them  of  it." — "  Hark, 

The  bride  comes  !      Here  she  comes,  in  a  stream  of  milk !  " 

"  There  !     Dear,  you  are  asleep  still ;  don't  you  know 

The  five  Miss  Granvilles  ?     Always  dressed  in  white 

To  show  they're  ready  to  be  married."     "  Lower  ! 

The  aunt  is  at  your  elbow."     "  Lady  Maud, 

Did  Lady  Waldemar  tell  you  she  had  seen 

This  girl  of  Leigh's  ?  "     "  No,  wait.     'Twas  Mrs.  Brookes 

Who  told  me  Lady  Waldemar  told  her — 

No,  'twasn't  Mrs.  Brookes." 

Such  tattle,  whether  uttered  by  aristocrats  or  by 
democrats,  was  surely  not  worthy  of  poetical  record, 
and  we  may,  I  think,  cherish  the  belief  that  it  is 
impossibly  vulgar  and  impossibly  trivial. 

With  no  better  entertainment  than  such  conversa- 
tion, the  ladies  and  gentlemen  naturally  grew  impa- 
tient for  the  appearance  of  Marian  Erie,  and  for  the 
commencement  of  the  ceremony.  At  length  Komney 
stood  forward,  a  letter  in  his  hand,  and,  with  face  of 
appropriate  ghostliness  and  ghastliness,  announced 
that  the  girl  had  disappeared  and  that  there  would  be 
no  marriage.  "  I  am  very  weak,"  he  said,  which  was 
true.  "  I  meant  but  only  good,"  he  added,  which  was 
also  true,  but  little  to  the  purpose. 

My  friends,  you  are  all  dismissed.     Go,  eat  and  drink 
According  to  the  program  me, — and  farewell. 

So  curt  a  dismissal  was  barely  courteous,  and  the 
crowd,  tired  with  waiting,  did  not  receive  it  favour- 


In  the  Church.  141 


ably.  The  cry  rose  that  the  girl  had  had  foul  play. 
One  Amazon  of  logical  mind  thought  that  the  thing 
was  too  plain  to  be  doubted. 

Disappear ! 

Who  ever  disappears  except  a  ghost  ? 
And  who  believes  a  story  of  a  ghost  ? 
I  ask  you, — would  a  girl  go  off,  instead 
Of  staying  to  be  married  ?     A  fine  tale  ! 
A  wicked  man,  I  say,  a  wicked  man  ! 
For  my  part  I  would  rather  starve  on  gin 
Than  make  my  dinner  on  his  beef  and  beer. 

To  this  woman  the  crowd  gave  assent.  A  rush 
was  made  upon  Eomney.  Clamour  of  battle  and 
noise  as  of  fifty  Donnybrooks  arose  in  the  church. 
Fine  ladies  shrieked  or  swooned,  or  "  madly  fled  " 
and  fell,  "  trod  screeching  underneath  the  feet  of 
those  who  fled  and  screeched."  Hearing  the  wild 
cries  of  the  mob,  inciting  itself  to  pull  down  Bomney 
and'  kill  him,  Aurora  rushes  into  the  middle  of  the 
fray,  to  save  him,  or  rather  would  have  done  so, 
had  she  not  been  caught  back  by  some  one.  The 
rest  goes  without  saying.  She  fainted;  the  police 
succeeded  in  quelling  the  tumult ;  and  the  sublime 
scheme  for  the  union  of  class  with  class  went  the 
way  of  all  soap-bubbles.  Romney,  who  was  only  too 
good — so  good  as  to  be  good  for  nothing,  says  the 
shrewd  Spanish  proverb — modestly  accused  himself  of 
having  been  the  ruin  of  his  banished  bride. 

The  poor  child ! 

Poor  Marian  !  'twas  a  luckless  day  for  her, 
When  first  she  chanced  on  my  philanthropy. 

Where'all  is  improbable  to  the  verge  of  pantomime, 


142  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

it  seems  idle  to  specify  any  one  improbability ;  but  it 
is  difficult  to  imagine  anything  more  unlikely  to 
happen  than  that  Marian  Erie  should  have  left 
Eomney  in  the  lurch  on  the  eve  of  her  marriage.  She 
always  speaks  of  him  with  ardent  enthusiasm ;  his 
step  on  the  stair  is  music  to  her  ear ;  she  has  no  term 
to  suit  him  but  angel ;  and  yet  a  few  glozing  words 
from  Lady  Waldemar  suffice  to  persuade  her  to  leave 
the  country  without  bidding  him  good-bye.  Marian 
Erie  would  not  only  have  been  devoid  of  feminine 
ambition,  pride,  hope,  and  passion,  but  would  have 
been  more  stupidly  blind  to  Lady  Waldemar's  motives 
than  any  daughter  of  Eve,  not  a  born  idiot,  could  be, 
if  she  had  permitted  the  fine  lady  to  cheat  her  so 
easily  out  of  a  husband.  Of  course  the  pretext  was 
that  Eomney  would  be  unhappy  with  Marian  and 
supremely  happy  with  Lady  Waldemar;  but  she 
would  be  a  strange  woman  who  could  be  persuaded  by 
a  rival  that  the  man  who  had  chosen  her  must  be 
wretched  in  spite  of  her  wifely  devotion  to  him,  and 
that  she  could  never  be  happy  as  his  wife.  It  is  im- 
portant to  observe  also  that,  in  arguing  Marian  into 
the  desertion,  Lady  Waldemar  gives  no  proof  of  that 
inexpressible  adroitness  of  logic  and  rhetoric,  by  which 
Shakespeare  enables  us  to  understand  how  his  bad 
people  carry  out  their  plots.  And  even  if  we  grant 
that  Lady  Waldemar  might  have  prevailed  upon 
Marian  Erie  to  decline  the  match,  is  it  credible  that 
her  ladyship  would  have  timed  the  explosion  for  the 
wedding-day,  thus  giving  the  utmost  publicity  to 


Improbability  of  the  Plot.  143 

the  affair?  Would  she,  last  of  all,  have  allowed 
Marian  to  inform  Romney  of  her  departure  in  a 
letter  in  which  Lady  Waldemar  was  said  to  have 
come  nine  times  to  see  her,  and  was  unmistakahly 
referred  to  as  an  "  over-generous  friend,"  who  had 
promised  to  care  for  Marian  and  keep  her  happy? 
Having  condescended  to  steep  the  incidents  and 
characters  of  a  sensation  novel  in  the  empyrean 
colours  of  her  genius,  Mrs.  Browning  does  not  manage 
her  plot  with  the  ingenuity  of  a  tenth-rate  novelist. 

Aurora  now  addresses  herself  with  fresh  earnestness 
to  literature,  but  she  is  haunted  more  than  ever  hy  the 
thought  of  Romney.  She  has  come  round  to  her 
lover's  opinion,  which  also  was  Goethe's,  that  women 
work  for  the  individual  or  for  the  family,  not  for 
the  race,  an  opinion  which,  as  we  saw,  she  formerly 
renounced  and  resented. 

There  it  is ; 

We  women  are  too  apt  to  look  to  one, 
Which  proves  a  certain  impotence  in  art. 
We  strain  our  natures  at  doing  something  great, 
Far  less  because  it's  something  great  to  do, 
Than,  haply,  that  we  so  commend  ourselves 
As  being  not  small,  and  more  appreciable 
To  some  one  friend. 

She  determines  that  she  will  work  as  a  true  artist. 
She  will  "  have  no  traffic  with  the  personal  thought  in 
Art's  pure  temple."  She  will  aim,  as  men  aim,  at  the 
highest  excellence,  and  if  she  fail,  she  bids  her  critics 
tell  her  so,  and  honour  her  "  with  truth,  if  not  with 
praise."  Then  she  dashes  into  criticism  of  her  own 


144  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

works,  and  her  criticism  is,  as  usual,  masterly.  The 
following  passage  will  bear  a  second  or  even  a  third 
reading.  It  presents  Mrs.  Browning's  view  of  art  as 
concerned  essentially  with  reality,  not  with  the  fan- 
tastic architecture  of  the  brain,  even  if  that  architec- 
ture is  so  beautiful  as  the  mythology  of  Greece,  a 
view  which  she  had  already  embodied  in  her  noble 
poem  on  the  gods  of  Hellas.  The  passage  touches  also 
upon  the  doctrine  of  poetic  symbolism  in  its  applica- 
tion to  the  world  and  all  that  it  contains  ;  every  flower, 
and  star,  and  stream  being,  for  the  poet,  a  word  or 
text  in  a  volume  filled  with  glorious  emblems. 


In  that  descriptive  poem  called  "  The  Hills  " 

The  prospects  were  too  far  and  indistinct. 

'Tis  true  my  critics  said,  "  A  fine  view  that !  " 

The  public  scarcely  cared  to  climb  the  book 

For  even  the  finest ;  and  the  public's  right — 

A  tree's  mere  firewood,  unless  humanised ; 

Which  well  the  Greeks  knew  when  they  stirred  the  bark 

With  close-pressed  bosoms  of  subsiding  nymphs, 

And  made  the  forest-rivers  garrulous 

With  babble  of  gods.     For  us,  we  are  called  to  mark 

A  still  more  intimate  humanity 

In  this  inferior  nature,  or  ourselves 

Must  fall  like  dead  leaves  trodden  under  foot 

By  veritable  artists.     Earth,  shut  up 

By  Adam,  like  a  fakir  in  a  box 

Left  too  long  buried,  remained  stiff  and  dry, 

A  mere  dumb  corpse,  till  Christ  the  Lord  came  down, 

Unlocked  the  doors,  forced  open  the  blank  eyes, 

And  used  His  kingly  chrisms  to  straighten  out 

The  leathery  tongue  turned  back  into  the  throat ; 

Since  when  she  lives,  remembers,  palpitates 

In  every  limb,  aspires  in  every  breath, 

Embraces  infinite  relations.     Now 


Philosophical  Criticism.  145 

We  want  no  half-gods,  Panomphoean  Joves, 

Fauns,  Naiads,  Tritons,  Oreads,  and  the  rest, 

To  take  possession  of  a  senseless  world 

To  unnatural  vampire-uses.     See  the  earth 

The  body  of  our  body,  the  green  earth 

Indubitably  human,  like  this  flesh 

And  these  articulated  veins  through  which 

Our  heart  drives  blood !     There's  not  a  flower  of  spring 

That  dies  ere  June  but  vaunts  itself  allied 

By  issue  and  symbol,  by  significance 

And  correspondence,  to  that  spirit- world 

Outside  the  limits  of  our  space  and  time 

Whereto  we  are  bound.     Let  poets  give  it  voice 

With  human  meanings  ;  else  they  miss  the  thought, 

And  henceforth  step  down  lower,  stand  confessed 

Instructed  poorly  for  interpreters, 

Thrown  out  by  an  easy  cowslip  in  the  text. 

Even  so  my  pastoral  failed ;  it  was  a  book 

Of  surface-pictures — pretty,  cold,  and  false 

With  literal  transcript — the  worse  done,  I  think, 

For  being  not  ill- done.     Let  me  set  my  mark 

Against  such  doings,  and  do  otherwise. 

This  strikes  me.     If  the  public  whom  we  know, 

Could  catch  me  at  such  admissions,  I  should  pass 

For  being  right  modest.     Yet  how  proud  we  are, 

In  daring  to  look  down  upon  ourselves  ! 

She  proceeds  to  discuss  the  question  of  the  fitness 
of  the  present  age  to  he  poetically  treated.  "  Thinkers 
scout "  our  time,  and  poets  abound  "  who  scorn  to 
touch  it  with  a  finger-tip."  They  call  it  an  age  of 
pewter,  of  scum,  of  mere  transition.  All  this  she 
declares  to  he  the  wrong  thinking  that  makes  poor 
poems,  and  she  illustrates,  by  a  very  fine  poetical 
figure,  the  tendency  of  the  people  of  each  successive 
age  to  think  their  own  age  trivial. 

Every  age, 
Through  being  held  too  close,  is  ill-discerned 

10 


146  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

By  those  who  have  not  lived  past  it.     We'll  suppose 

Mount  Athos  carved,  as  Persian  Xerxes  schemed, 

To  some  colossal  statue  of  a  man  : 

The  peasants,  gathering  brushwood  in  his  ear, 

Had  guessed  as  little  of  any  human  form 

Up  there,  as  would  a  flock  of  browsing  goats. 

They'd  have,  in  fact,  to  travel  ten  miles  off 

Or  ere  the  giant  image  broke  on  them, 

Full  human  profile,  nose  and  chin  distinct, 

Mouth,  muttering  rhythms  of  silence  up  the  sky, 

And  fed  at  evening  with  the  blood  of  suns  ; 

Grand  torso, — hand,  that  flung  perpetually 

The  largess  of  a  silver  river  down 

To  all  the  country  pastures.     'Tis  even  thus 

With  times  we  live  in, — evermore  too  great 

To  be  apprehended  near. 

She  bids  poets,  if  they  can  sing  at  all,  sing  "  this 
live,  throbbing  age,  that  brawls,  cheats,  maddens, 
calculates,  aspires."  For  her  own  part,  she  says  that 
she  worked  with  the  true  earnestness  of  the  artist. 
"  With  no  amateur's  irreverent  haste  and  busy  idle- 
ness," did  she  produce  her  book.  Not  failing  of  recog- 
nition, and  partially  succeeding  in  what  she  aimed  at, 
she  nevertheless  was  sad.  The  womanhood  in  her 
called  and  craved  for  something  more  than  art, — for 
affection,  for  love,  for  home. 

O  supreme  Artist,  who  as  sole  return 

For  all  the  cosmic  wonder  of  Thy  work, 

Demandest  of  us  just  a  word,  a  name, 

"  My  Father  ! " — Thou  hast  knowledge,  only  Thou, 

How  dreary  'tis  for  women  to  sit  still 

On  winter  nights  by  solitary  fires, 

And  hear  the  nations  praising  them  far  off, 

Too  far!  ay,  praising  our  quick  sense  of  love, 

Our  very  heart  of  passionate  womanhood, 


Fame  and  Love.  147 

Which  could  not  beat  so  in  the  verse  without 
Being  present  also  in  the  unkissed  lips, 
And  eyes  undried  because  there's  none  to  ask 
The  reason  they  grow  moist. 

To  sit  alone, 

And  think,  for  comfort,  how,  that  very  night, 
Affianced  lovers,  leaning  face  to  face 
With  sweet  half-listenings  for  each  other's  breath, 
Are  reading  haply  from  some  page  of  ours, 
To  pause  with  a  thrill,  as  if  their  cheeks  had  touched, 
When  such  a  stanza,  level  to  their  mood, 
Seems  floating  their  own  thought  out — "  So  I  feel 
For  thee  " — "  And  I,  for  thee  :  "  this  poet  knows 
What  everlasting  love  is ! — how,  that  night, 
A  father,  issuing  from  the  misty  roads 
Upon  the  luminous  round  of  lamp  and  hearth 
And  happy  children,  having  caught  up  first 
The  youngest  there  until  it  shrunk  and  shrieked 
To  feel  the  cold  chin  prick  its  dimples  through 
With  winter  from  the  hills,  may  throw  i'  the  lap 
Of  the  eldest  (who  has  learnt  to  drop  her  lids 
To  hide  some  sweetness  newer  than  last  year's) 
Our  book  and  cry,  "Ah  you,  you  care  for  rhymes  ; 
So  here  be  rhymes  to  pore  on  under  trees, 
When  April  comes  to  let  you  !     I've  been  told 
They  are  not  idle  as  so  many  are, 
But  set  hearts  beating  pure  as  well  as  fast : 
It's  yours,  the  book ;  I'll  write  your  name  injt, — 
That  so  you  may  not  lose,  however  lost 
In  poet's  lore  and  charming  reverie, 
The  thoughts  of  how  your  father  thought  of  you 
In  riding  from  the  town." 

Fame — "the  love  of  all " — is,  the  woman-poet  admits, 
"  but  a  small  thing  to  the  love  of  one."  The  love  of  Kom- 
ney  seemed  meanwhile  to  be  finally  lost  to  Aurora  by 
his  marriage  to  Lady  Waldemar,  which  she  believed  to 
have  taken  place  about  this  time  or  soon  after.  She 
resolved  to  leave  England  and  revisit  her  native  Italy, 

10—2 


148  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

taking  Paris  in  her  way.  In  Paris  she  meets  with 
Marian  Erie.  The  girl  had  been  subjected  to  infamous 
treatment,  and,  without  any  fault  of  hers,  had  become 
a  mother.  The  woman  to  whose  care  Lady  Waldemar 
had  committed  her  had  turned  out  to  be  diabolically 
bad,  but  there  is  no  reason  to  suppose  that  the  worst 
horror  in  Marian's  tragedy  had  been  contemplated  by 
her  ladyship.  Aurora  and  Marian  go  on  to  Italy  in 
company.  The  lines  descriptive  of  Aurora's  night- 
watch  on  deck,  as  she  sails  along  the  Mediterranean 
coast  and  looks  out  for  Italy,  are,  like  all  the  descrip- 
tive passages  in  this  book,  full  of  the  loveliest  poetry. 

I  sate  upon  the  deck  and  watched  all  night, 
And  listened  through  the  stars  for  Italy. 
Sate  silent :  I  could  hear  my  own  soul  speak, 
And  had  my  friend, — for  Nature  comes  sometimes 
And  says,  "I  am  ambassador  for  God." 
I  felt  the  wind  soft  from  the  land  of  souls  ; 
The  old  miraculous  mountains  heaved  in  sight, 
One  straining  past  another  along  the  shore, 
The  way  of  grand  dull  Odyssean  ghosts 
Athirst  to  drink  the  cool  blue  wine  of  seas 
And  stare  on  voyagers.     Peak  pushing  peak 
They  stood :  I  watched  beyond  that  Tyrian  belt 
Of  intense  sea  betwixt  them  and  the  ship, 
Down  all  their  sides  the  misty  olive-woods 
Dissolving  in  the  weak  congenial  moon, 
And  still  disclosing  some  brown  convent-tower 
That  seems  as  if  it  grew  from  some  brown  rock, — 
Or  many  a  little  lighted  village,  dropt 
Like  a  fallen  star,  upon  so  high  a  point, 
You  wonder  what  can  keep  it  in  its  place 
From  sliding  headlong  with  the  waterfalls 
Which  drop  and  powder  all  the  myrtle-groves 
With  spray  of  silver.     Thus  my  Italy 
Was  stealing  on  us.     Genoa  broke  with  day ; 


How  To  Read  "Aurora  Leigh." 


The  Doria's  long  pale  palace  striking  out 

From  green  hills  in  advance  of  the  white  town, 

A  marble  finger  dominant  to  ships, 

Seen  glimmering  through  the  uncertain  gray  of  dawn. 

How  Eomney  follows  Aurora  and  Marian  to  Italy  — 
how  he  still  proposes  to  marry  Marian  —  how  Aurora 
and  he  continue  at  cross  purposes  with  each  other  — 
how  Marian  declines  to  accept  Bomney  a  second  time 
—  and  how  the  cousins  at  last  make  it  up,  and  finish 
the  poem  with  a  burst  of  commonplaces,  gloriously 
versified,  about  "  the  love  of  wedded  souls  "  —  my 
readers  must  learn  for  themselves.  Perhaps  it  would 
be  no  bad  advice  to  those  who  wish  to  make  Aurora 
Leigh  the  means  of  knowing  Mrs.  Browning  in  her 
strength  and  not  in  her  weakness,  to  dip  into  it  here 
and  there,  to  dwell  upon  its  poetic  beauty  as  distin- 
guished from  its  qualities  as  a  novel,  and  thus  to  get 
rid  of  its  plot  altogether.  You  cannot  read  in  it  too 
often  —  you  are  in  no  danger  of  exhausting  its 
treasures  ;  but  you  may  read  it  too  long  at  a  time. 
There  is  no  end  to  its  good  things  —  its  pithy,  epigram- 
matic sayings,  its  felicities  of  metaphor  and  picture. 

Wolffs  an  atheist  ; 
And  if  the  Iliad  fell  out,  as  he  says, 
By  mere  fortuitous  concourse  of  old  songs, 
We'll  guess  as  much,  too,  for  the  universe. 

A  tree's  mere  firewood,  unless  humanised. 

Let  us  pray 
God's  grace  to  keep  God's  image  in  repute. 

Art's  the  witness  of  what  IS 

Beyond  this  show.     If  this  world's  show  were  all, 
Mere  imitation  would  be  all  in  Art. 


150  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

We  should  be  ashamed  to  sit  beneath  those  stars, 
Impatient  that  we're  nothing. 

Art  is  much,  but  love  is  more. 
O  Art,  my  Art,  thou'rt  much,  but  Love  is  more ! 
Art  symbolises  heaven,  but  Love  is  God 
And  makes  heaven. 

Here  is  a  metaphysical  snatch,  in  which  metaphysics 
and  poetry  are  so  mixed  and  mingled,  and  yet  so  fitly 
wedded  together,  that  we  can  hardly  tell  which  is 
crimson  and  which  cloud  : 

No  lily-muffled  hum  of  a  summer  bee 

But  finds  some  coupling  with  the  spinning  stars  ; 

No  pebble  at  your  foot  but  proves  a  sphere ; 

No  chaffinch  but  implies  the  cherubim  : 

And, — glancing  on  my  own  thin,  veined  wrist, — 

In  such  a  little  trernour  of  the  blood 

The  whole  strong  clamour  of  a  vehement  soul 

Doth  utter  itself  distinct.    Earth's  crammed  with  heaven, 

And  every  common  bush  afire  with  God  : 

But  only  he  who  sees,  takes  off  his  shoes ; 

The  rest  sit  round  it,  and  pluck  blackberries, 

And  daub  their  natural  faces  unaware 

More  and  more,  from  the  first  similitude. 

Or  take  this  solemn  and  profoundly  Christian 
prayer : 

Alas,  long-suffering  and  most  patient  God, 
Thou  need'st  be  surelier  God  to  bear  with  us 
Than  even  to  have  made  us !   Thou,  aspire,  aspire 
From  henceforth  for  me  !     Thou  who  hast,  Thyself, 
Endured  this  flesh-hood,  knowing  how,  as  a  soaked 
And  sucking  vesture,  it  would  drag  us  down 
And  choke  us  in  the  melancholy  deep, 
Sustain  me,  that,  with  Thee,  I  walk  these  waves, 
Kesisting ! — breathe  me  upward,  Thou  for  me 
Aspiring,  who  are  the  Way,  the  Truth,  the  Life, — 


Marian's  Child.  151 

That  no  truth  henceforth  seem  indifferent, 
No  way  to  truth  laborious,  and  no  life, 
Not  even  this  life  I  live,  intolerable  ! 

From  these  sublime  heights,  to  take  farewell  of 
this  [astonishing  poem,  we  shall  descend  into  the 
room  in  which  Aurora  Leigh  and  Marian  Erie 
enjoy  the  woman's  treat  of  having  a  long  look  at 
Marian's  baby. 

I  saw  the  whole  room,  I  and  Marian  there 
Alone. 

Alone  ?  she  threw  her  bonnet  off, 
Then,  sighing  as  'twere  sighing  the  last  time, 
Approached  the  bed,  and  drew  a  shawl  away  : 
You  could  not  peel  a  fruit  you  fear  to  bruise 
More  calmly  and  more  carefully  than  so, — 
Nor  would  you  find  within,  a  rosier-flushed 
Pomegranate — 

There  he  lay,  upon  his  back, 
The  yearling  creature,  warm  and  moist  with  life 
To  the  bottom  of  his  dimples, — to  the  ends 
Of  the  lovely  tumbled  curls  about  his  face  ; 
For  since  he  had  been  covered  over-much 
To  keep  him  from  the  light-glare,  both  his  cheeks 
Were  hot  and  scarlet  as  the  first  live  rose 
The  shepherd's  heart-blood  ebbed  away  into, 
The  faster  for  his  love.     And  love  was  here 
An  instant !  in  the  pretty  baby-mouth, 
Shut  close  as  if  for  dreaming  that  it  sucked ; 
The  little  naked  feet  drawn  up  the  way 
Of  nestled  birdlings ;  everything  so  soft 
And  tender, — to  the  little  holdfast  hands, 
Which,  closing  on  a  finger  into  sleep, 
Had  kept  the  mould  oft. 

Ill  closing  the  book,  I  feel  that  my  extracts  do  it 
nothing  like  justice.  It  is  starred  with  splendours  like 


152  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

a  clear  night  in  June,  or  a  morning  meadow  sown 
with  orient  pearl. 


CONCLUSION. 

"  I  am,  of  course,  not  acquainted,"  I  remarked 
when,  many  years  ago,  I  first  had  occasion  to  print 
my  estimate  of  Mrs.  Browning,  "  with  the  works  of 
all  great  female  writers,  perhaps  not  even  of  many. 
But  as  you  look  towards  the  brow  of  a  towering 
mountain,  rising  far  over  the  clouds,  and  crowned  with 
ancient  snow,  you  may  have  an  assurance,  even  though 
it  rises  from  a  plain,  or,  if  amid  lower  hills,  though 
you  have  not  actually  taken  the  elevation  of  each,  that 
in  height  it  is  peerless.  In  the  poems  of  Mrs.  Brown- 
ing are  qualities  which  admit  of  their  being  compared 
with  those  of  the  greatest  men ;  touches  which  only 
the  mightiest  give.  These  may  not  come  often  enough, 
or  they  may  be  too  often  associated  with  the  spasm  of 
woman's  vehemence,  to  permit  her  a  seat  beside 
those  mightiest.  With  the  few  sovereigns  of  litera- 
ture, the  Homers,  Shakespeares,  Miltons,  she  will  not 
rank.  But  in  full  recollection  of  Scott's  vivacity,  and 
bright,  cheerful  glow;  of  Byron's  fervid  passion  and 
magnificent  description ;  of  Wordsworth's  majesty ;  of 
Shelley's  million-coloured  fancy;  of  Coleridge's  occa- 
sional flights  right  into  the  sun-glare;  of  Bailey's  tropic 
exuberance,  and  of  Tennyson's  golden  calm ;  I  yet 
hold  her  worthy  of  being  mentioned  with  any  poet  of 
this  century.  She  has  the  breadth  and  versatility  of  a 


Conclusion.  153 


man  ;  no  sameliness,  no  one  idea,  no  type  character ; 
our  single  Shakespearean  woman.  In  this  I  am 
agreed  with  by  the  author  of  The  Baven,  a  critic  of 
great  acuteness  and  originality.  '  Woman,  sister,' 
says  Thomas  de  Quincey,  '  there  are  some  things 
which  you  do  not  execute  as  well  as  your  brother, 
man;  no,  nor  ever  will.  Pardon  me,  if  I  doubt 
whether  you  will  ever  produce  a  great  poet  from  your 
choirs,  or  a  Mozart,  or  a  Phidias,  or  a  Michael  Angelo, 
or  a  great  scholar ;  by  which  last  is  meant,  not  one 
who  depends  simply  on  an  infinite  memory,  but  also 
on  an  infinite  and  electrical  power  of  combination, 
bringing  together  from  the  four  winds,  like  the  angel 
of  the  resurrection,  what  else  were  dust  from  dead 
men's  bones,  into  the  unity  of  breathing  life.  If  you 
can  create  yourselves  into  any  of  these  great  creators, 
why  have  you  not  ?  '  Mrs.  Browning  has  exalted  her 
sex;  this  passage  was  true." 

There  is,  perhaps,  more  of  enthusiasm  than  of  dis- 
crimination in  these  young-mannish  sentences.  Mrs. 
Browning  I  still  hold  to  be,  in  the  full  sense  of  the 
term,  a  great  poet,  but  I  now  see  that  De  Quincey 
might  have  maintained  the  negative  on  that  question 
with  more  weighty  reasoning  than  I  then  surmised; 
and  when  I  so  confidently  pronounced  Mrs.  Browning 
the  greatest  of  women,  fame  was  but  beginning 
to  whisper  the  name  of  George  Eliot.  I  would 
now  content  myself  with  saying  that,  in  fervour, 
melodiousness,  and  splendour  of  poetic  genius,  Mrs. 
Browning  stands,  to  the  best  of  my  knowledge,  first 


154  Elizabeth  Barrett  Browning. 

among  women ;  that,  in  tunefulness,  the  distinctive 
quality  of  the  poet,  George  Eliot  is  greatly  her 
inferior  ;  but  that,  in  knowledge  of  life,  insight 
into  character,  comprehensiveness  and  penetration  of 
thought,  and  the  plastic  energy  by  which  the  literary 
artist  moulds  his  figures,  she  was  not  the  equal  of 
George  Eliot. 


CHAELOTTE    BRONTE    AND    HER 
SISTERS. 


CHAPTEK  I. 

GENERAL  IMPRESSION  OF  CHARLOTTE  BRONTE 
—  THACKERAY'S  OPINION  OF  HER-— MRS. 
GASKELL'S  BIOGRAPHY  AND  MR.  WEMYSS 
REID'S  MONOGRAPH— THE  JOY  OF  THE  MOOR- 
LAND—THE FATHER  AND  MOTHER  OF  THE 
BRONTES— THE  FATHER'S  POEMS. 

THE  main  impression  derived  from  the  works  of 
Charlotte  Bronte  or  Nicholls — better  known  a 
quarter  of  a  century  ago  as  Currer  Bell — is  that  of 
vivid  strength  combined  with  moral  vehemence.  This 
is  the  idea  Thackeray  felicitously  expresses  when  he 
calls  her  "  an  austere  little  Joan  of  Arc  marching  in 
upon  us,  and  rebuking  our  easy  lives,  our  easy 
morals." 

While  she  lived,  very  little  was  known  of  her 
history ;  and  the  announcement  of  her  death,  follow- 
ing swiftly  upon  that  of  her  marriage,  fell  upon  the 
public  with  a  suddenness  which  added  poignancy  to 
the  pang  arising  from  the  knowledge  that  a  genius 
which,  -ten  years  before,  had  not  scaled  the  horizon, 
and  which  had  shone  for  a  time  with  piercing  bril- 
liance, was  already  overtaken  by  the  eclipse  of  death. 


158  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

It  was  in  1855,  when  the  issue  of  the  Crimean  war 
was  still  undecided,  that  she  died.  "  Even  while  the 
heart  of  the  British  nation  " — thus  I  wrote  at  the 
time — "  is  filled  to  overflowing  hy  one  great  anguish 
and  one  great  hope,  a  thrill  of  real  sorrow  will  pass 
to  every  corner  of  the  land  with  the  tidings  that  Mrs. 
Nicholls,  formerly  Charlotte  Bronte,  and  known  to  all 
the  world  as  Currer  Bell,  is  no  more.  But  a  few 
months  ago  we  heard  of  her  marriage.  "We  learned, 
with  a  smile  of  happy  surprise,  that  the  merciless 
derider  of  weak  and  insipid  suitors  had  found  a  lord 
and  master — that  the  hand  which  drew  the  three 
worshipful  ecclesiastics,  Malone,  Donne,  and  Sweet- 
ing, had  been  locked  at  the  altar  in  that  of  a  curate. 
And  already  the  smile  fades  away  in  the  sound  of  her 
funeral  knell,  leaving  us  to  reflect,  that  all  of  fruit  and 
flower  which  time  might  have  matured  in  the  garden 
of  her  genius  has  been  nipped  by  the  frost  of  death. 
There  is  something  which  strikes  one  as  peculiarly 
touching  in  the  death  of  Currer  Bell.  She  seemed  so 
full  of  animation,  of  vigour;  life  danced  in  her  veins 
like  new  wine ;  all  she  said  was  so  fresh  and  stirring ; 
the  child-look — taking  this  for  a  grand  world,  worth 
living  in,  no  place  for  whining— was  still  on  her  face. 
The  brave  little  woman!  in  whose  works  you  could 
not  point  to  a  slovenly  line,  to  an  obscure  or  tarrying 
idea.  You  thought  of  her  as  combining  the  iron  will 
of  her  little  Jane  with  the  peerless  nature  of  her 
Shirley,  the  beautiful  pantheress,  the  forest-born. 
She  could  have  stood  out  under  the  lightning,  to 


Thackeray's  Opinion.  159 

trace,  with  firm  pencil,  its  zigzags  of  crackling  fire. 
And  now  she,  too,  is  but  a  few  handfuls  of  white 
dust !  Her  step  will  never  more  be  upon  the  loved 
wolds  of  Yorkshire,  and  the  broad  moors  which  she 
made  classic  by  her  genius. 

Her  part  in  all  the  pomp  that  fills 
The  circuit  of  the  summer  hills 
Is  that  her  grave  is  green." 

Thackeray  saw  her  in  London,  and  the  few  words 
we  have  from  him,  whether  descriptive  of  her  person, 
or  characterising  the  spirit  of  her  books,  are  deeply 
interesting.  ''Which  of  her  readers,"  he  asks,  "has 
not  become  her  friend?  Who  that  has  known  her 
books  has  not  admired  the  artist's  noble  English,  the 
burning  love  of  truth,  the  bravery,  the  simplicity,  the 
indignation  at  wrong,  the  eager  sympathy,  the  pious 
love  and  reverence,  the  passionate  honour,  so  to  speak, 
of  the  woman?"  "  I  can  only  say  of  this  lady,  vidi 
tantum.  I  saw  her  first  just  as  I  rose  out  of  an  illness 
from  which  I  had  never  thought  to  recover.  I  re- 
member the  trembling  little  frame,  the  little  hand,  the 
great  honest  eyes.  An  impetuous  honesty  seemed  to 
me  to  characterise  the  woman.  Twice  I  recollect 
she  took  me  to  task  for  what  she  held  to  be  errors  in 
doctrine.  Once  about  Fielding  we  had  a  disputation. 
She  spoke  her  mind  out.  She  jumped  too  rapidly  to 
conclusions."  Her  judgment  of  London  celebrities 
struck  Thackeray  as  often  premature;  "  but,  perhaps," 
he  confesses,  "  the  city  is  rather  angry  at  being 
judged."  "  She  gave  me  the  impression  of  being  a 


160  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

very  pure,  and  lofty,  and  high-minded  person.  A 
great  and  holy  reverence  of  right  and  truth  seemed 
to  be  with  her  always.  Such,  in  our  brief  interview, 
she  appeared  to  me." 

The  memory  of  Charlotte  Bronte  is  indissolubly 
associated  with  that  of  her  sisters,  Emily  and  Anne. 
Mrs.  Gaskell's  biography  of  Charlotte,  an  acknow- 
ledged masterpiece  in  that  difficult  branch  of  litera- 
ture, has  set  before  the  world  in  imperishable  colours 
the  little  Haworth  Parsonage,  with  its  neighbouring 
graves  and  circling  moors,  the  saturnine  father,  the 
unhappy  son,  and  the  three  shy,  pale,  plain  daughters 
marked  for  early  death,  that  belonged  to  the  immortals 
of  the  world.  "  What  a  story,"  says  Thackeray 
again,  "  is  that  of  that  family  of  poets  in  their  soli- 
tude yonder  on  the  gloomy  northern  moors  !  At  nine 
o'clock  at  night,  Mrs.  Gaskell  tells  us,  after  evening 
prayers,  when  their  guardian  and  relative  had  gone  to 
bed,  the  three  poetesses — the  three  maidens,  Charlotte, 
and  Emily,  and  Anne — Charlotte  being  '  the  motherly 
friend  and  guardian  to  the  other  two  ' — began,  like 
restless  wild  animals,  to  pace  up  and  down  their 
parlour,  '  making  out '  their  wonderful  stories,  talking 
over  plans  and  projects  and  thoughts  of  what  was  to 
be  their  future  life." 

Perhaps,  however,  Mrs.  Gaskell  has  conveyed  an 
exaggerated  impression  of  the  gloom  and  desolation  of 
the  childhood  of  the  Brontes.  Mr.  Wemyss  Keid, 
who  has  made  Charlotte  Bronte  and  her  sisters  the 
subject  of  an  admirably  executed  monograph,  while 


The  Joy  of  the  Moors.  161 

acknowledging  the  great  ability  and  value  of  Mrs. 
Gaskell's  work,  thinks  that  she  has  cast  the  shadow 
too  deeply  and  too  soon  over  the  young  Brontes.  We 
have  traces,  in  the  earlier  part  of  their  lives,  of  what 
he  justly  calls  "  a  wholesome,  healthy  happiness." 
No  one,  I  am  convinced,  will  wonder  at  the  fact,  who 
has  had  any  experience  of  what  a  high  moor  on  a 
summer  day  is  to  a  child.  My  own  first  few  years, 
after  emerging  from  infancy,  were  passed  among  moors 
in  the  north  of  Scotland,  hleaker  than  it  might  be 
easy  to  find  in  Yorkshire  ;  and  the  intense  and  inex- 
pressible sweetness  of  roamings  among  the  heather  in 
summer  days  remains  with  me  to  this  hour  as  one  of 
the  supreme  sensations  of  my  life.  This  wild  joy  of 
the  moorland  is  everywhere  traceable  in  the  Bronte 
books.  The  very  soul  of  the  music  that  lives,  and  will 
live  for  ever,  in  the  works  of  the  sisters,  would  have 
been  absent,  if  they  had  not  heard  the  song  of  the 
winds,  and  seen  the  race  of  the  clouds,  upon  the  York- 
shire moors.  Mr.  Wemyss  Eeid,  therefore,  has  done 
good  service  in  counteracting  the  idea  that  their  life  at 
Haworth  was  altogether  dreary  and  desolate. 

In  respect  of  human  companionship,  however,  the 
Bronte  children  were  to  be  pitied .  Their  mother  died 
when  they  were  tiny  things,  and  their  aunt,  who  came 
to  take  care  of  them,  was  not  fond  of  children,  and  had 
no  motherly  ways.  The  servant-of- all- work,  Tabby, 
who  assisted  their  aunt  in  the  housekeeping,  was  the 
only  other  female  inmate  of  the  Parsonage  ;  and  she, 
though  evidently  a  rough  Yorkshire-woman,  had 

11 


162  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

enough  kindness  of  heart  to  commend  her  class  to 
Charlotte  and  Emily,  and  thus  to  make  the  family 
servants  about  the  most  agreeahle  people  in  their 
novels. 

The  father  was  peculiar.  An  Irishman  by  birth, 
and  rejoicing  in  the  thoroughly  Irish  name  of  Prunty 
• — Patrick  Prunty — he  had  cast  off  his  Irish  name  and 
called  England  his  adopted  country.  He  was  a  Tory 
of  the  Wellington  type ;  and  I  have  seen — thanks  to 
the  courteous  suggestion  of  Mr.  Garnett,  of  the  British 
Museum — three  letters,  published  by  him  in  the  Leeds 
Intelligencer  newspaper,  in  January  and  February, 
1829,  in  which  he  discusses  the  question  of  Koman 
Catholic  Emancipation.  Not  opposing  all  concession, 
he  insists  that,  if  Koman  Catholics  are  admitted  to 
the  franchise,  it  will  be  necessary,  in  order  to  secure 
the  Protestantism  of  the  realm,  to  vest  in  the  King  a 
power  "  summarily  to  remove  from  both  Houses  of 
Parliament,  and  from  seats  on  the  judicial  bench,  all 
Roman  Catholics,  when  in  his  judgment  they  were 
about  to  encourage  measures  subversive  of  our  glorious 
Constitution  in  Church  and  State."  This  obviously 
inadmissible  and,  in  fact,  childish  proposal  enables  us 
to  gauge  his  sagacity  and  information  as  a  politician ; 
and  the  general  cast  of  his  thought  on  political  ques- 
tions may  be  further  guessed  from  this  incidental 
utterance  :  "  Our  limited  Monarchy,  which,  though  not 
altogether  perfect,  affords  the  most  rational  liberty  of 
any  other  Government  under  the  sun ;  and  comes, 
perhaps,  as  near  to  perfection  as  anything  that  can 


The  Father.  163 


be  devised  by,  or  accommodated  to,  fallen  mortals." 
This  was  written  before  Parliament  was  reformed, 
and  when  pocket  boroughs  and  a  good  many  other 
things  were  rotten  in  the  state  of  England. 

Old  Bronte  is  understood  to  be  represented  by 
Helstone,  the  Tory  clergyman  in  Shirley,  one  of 
Charlotte's  favourite  characters.  His  Toryism  was 
enthusiastically  taken  up  by  Charlotte,  though  I  am 
not  so  sure  as  to  Emily's  political  creed.  "  The 
election  !  the  election !  "  wrote  Charlotte  to  a  friend  in 
1835,  "  that  cry  has  rung  even  among  our  lonely  hills 
like  the  blast  of  a  trumpet.  .  .  .  Under  what 
banner  have  your  brothers  ranged  themselves — the 
Blue  or  the  Yellow  ?  Use  your  influence  with  them, 
entreat  them,  if  it  be  necessary,  on  your  knees,  to 
stand  by  their  country  and  religion  in  this  day 
of  danger  !  "  The  vehemently  Tory  Blackwood's 
Magazine  was  naturally  prized  in  the  parsonage  of 
Haworth,  and  the  good  stories  it  contained,  as  well 
as  its  political  articles,  were  doubtless  not  without 
effect  on  the  future  novelists.  The  children  were 
not  allowed  to  associate  with  the  children  of  the 
villagers,  and  grew  up  shy  and  sensitive,  but  not 
unhappy. 

Patrick  Bronte's  wife,  as  we  learn  from  Mrs. 
Gaskell  and  Mr.  Wemyss  Keid,  was  cast  in  a  very 
different  mould  from  that  of  her  husband.  He  was 
tall,  strong,  full  of  wiry  energy  and  rugged  force,  a 
man  against  whom  Fortune,  with  all  her  buffetings, 
had  no  chance,  who  stood  the  winter  of  the  moors  for 

11—2 


164  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 


more  than  half  a  century,  saw  his  children  die  around 
him,  and  lived  himself  to  he  eighty-five.     She  was  a 
small  woman,  of  the  Cornish  type  of  Celt,  frail  and 
fine.     Like  enough,   she  may  have  been  "  a  miracle 
of    symmetry,   a    miniature   of    loveliness,   all    grace 
summed  up  and  closed  in  little ;  "  certainly  she  was 
a   marked   contrast   to   that   Irish   Hercules,   Patrick 
Bronte.    There  is  no  reason  to  doubt  that  the  tall  man 
loved  his  delicate  and  gentle  wife.    "A  few  days  since" 
— thus   Charlotte   writes  in  1850 — "  a  little  incident 
happened  which  curiously  touched  me.     Papa  put  into 
my  hands  a  little  packet  of  letters  and  papers,  telling 
me  that  they  were  mamma's,  and  that  I  might  read 
them.     I  did  read  them,  in  a  frame  of  mind  I  cannot 
describe.     The    papers   were    yellow  with    time,   all 
having  been  written  before  I  was  born.    It  was  strange 
now  to  peruse,  for  the    first    time,  the   records  of  a 
mind  whence  my  own  sprang ;  and  most  strange,  and 
at  once  sad  and  sweet,  to  find  that  mind  of  a  truly 
fine,  pure,  and  elevated  order.     They  were  written  to 
papa  before  they  were  married.     There  is  a  rectitude, 
a  refinement,   a   constancy,    a  modesty,   a    sense,    a 
gentleness  about  them  indescribable."     It  may  be  that 
some  of  the  finest  veining  in  the  genius  of  the  sisters 
was  due    to  their  mother.     But  we  cannot   suppose 
that  Bronte   treated    her   with  much   kindness   and 
sympathy,  for  this   was   not   in  his  nature ;    and  in 
the    freakishness    of    his   jealous   pride    his    conduct 
was    sometimes   harsh,    as   when   he    cut    to    pieces 
a  dress  with  which   she  had   been  presented.      She 


Old  Bronte's  Poems.  165 

died  before  reaching  middle  age.  The  children 
manifestly  inherited  the  low  stamina  of  their  mother, 
as  well  as  their  father's  fervid  temperament  and 
literary  ambition. 

There   is   a  little  volume  in   the  British   Museum 
Library,  entitled  The  Rural  Minstrel :  a  Miscellany  of 
Descriptive  Poems,  which  was  given  to  the  world  by 
the  Eev.  Patrick  Bronte  in  1813.    At  that  date  neither 
Anne,  Emily,  nor  Charlotte  was  born.    Forty-six  years 
later,  when  all  his  children  were  dead,  Mr.  Bronte 
published  a  second  volume,  also  tiny,  styled  simply 
Cottage  Poems.     The  first  was  published  at  Halifax, 
the  second  at  Bradford.     I  have  glanced  over  both, 
and  have  not  seen  anything  extraordinary  in  either. 
There  is   almost   no   trace  of  originality  in  thought, 
feeling,  or  imagery.     A  strong  religious  sentiment  of 
the   old  Evangelical  type — the   Grimshaw,   Toplady, 
and  Wilberforce  type — pervades  the  poems  ;  the  Bible 
is  the  author's  avowed  model,  authoritative  and  in- 
superable, both  in  matters  of  thought  and  of  style  ; 
Broad  Church  speculation,  High  Church  enthusiasm, 
are   alike   absent.     The  versification  is  smooth,  and 
the  most  observable,  perhaps,  of   the  characteristics 
of  the  writer  is  an  unaffected,   perpetual,  child-like 
delight    in    the    wayside    beauties    of    Nature.      He 
never  tires   of  talking   about   birds  and   flowers  and 
dewdrops ;  and  a  fresh  glimpse  now  and  then  shows 
that  he  does  not  always  echo  the  chatter  of  books, 
but  has  cast  his  own  eye  lovingly  on  the  things  he 
rhymes  about. 


166  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

The  linnets  sweetly  sung 

On  every  fragrant  thorn, 
Whilst  from  the  tangled  wood 
The  blackbirds  hailed  the  morn ; 
And,  through  the  dew, 
Kan  here  and  there, 
But  half  afraid, 
The  startled  hare. 

The  first  of  these  stanzas  is  hopelessly  common- 
place, but  the  man  who  wrote  the  second  must,  I 
think,  have  watched  with  patient  pleasure  the  gambol- 
lings  of  half-startled  hares.  The  "ran  here  and  there 
but  half-afraid  "  is  absolutely  and  exquisitely  true  to 
that  air  of  half-domesticated  security  and  familiarity 
with  which  a  hare  will  frisk  about  upon  a  lawn, 
whither  it  has  stolen  from  the  adjoining  wood  or 
copse,  on  a  clear,  warm,  dewy  evening  in  June,  while 
overhead  the  thrush,  perched  on  the  highest  spray  of 
the  larch,  is  flooding  the  air  with  song.  I  speak  from 
evening  observation,  but  I  doubt  not  it  would  hold 
good  of  early  morning.  The  phenomena  that  fall  to 
be  chronicled  about  cottage  doors  were  well  known 
to  the  writer  of  the  following  verse,  and  he  would 
scarcely  have  placed  the  accent  so  nicely  on  the  right 
spot  in  the  drake,  if  he  had  not  possessed  something  of 
an  eye  for  colour. 

And  motley  ducks 
Were  waddling  seen, 

And  drake,  with  neck 
Of  glossy  green. 

We  may  safely  conclude  that  the  vein  of  poetry 
which  belonged  to  Charlotte,  Emily,  and  Anne,  and 


The  Father.  167 


of  which,  we  have  a  trace  in  Branwell,  was  inherited. 
Old  Bronte  was  a  man  of  undeveloped  genius ;  and 
the  fact  that  his  genius  was  undeveloped,  will  probably 
account  for  his  unsocial  ways,  his  moody  and  fitful 
temper,  and  his  trick  of  relieving  his  nervous  tension 
by  pistol-shooting.  I  have  seen  no  reference  by  the 
Brontes  to  their  father's  poetry,  nor  does  it  strike  me 
as  unlikely  that  they  may  never  have  read  it.  He 
took  his  meals  apart  from  his  children,  and  though 
they  regarded  him  with  a  feeling  of  respect  not  un- 
mixed with  affection,  he  was  not  on  terms  of  sympa- 
thetic intimacy  with  them.  Neither  Charlotte,  Emily, 
nor  Anne  ever  knew  the  ecstasy  of  such  a  moment  as 
that  remembered  so  vividly  by  Elizabeth  Barrett 
Browning,  when  her  father  looked  down  upon  "  the 
poet  at  his  knee,"  and  rewarded  her  with  a  kiss. 


CHAPTEE  II. 

BEANWELL  BRONTE— ME.  GRUNDY'S  REVELA- 
TIONS —  BRANWELL'S  LETTER  TO  WORDS- 
WORTH—CHARLOTTE'S CORRESPONDENCE 
WITH  SOUTHEY— BRANWELL'S  DEATH. 

PATKICK     BEANWELL    BEONTE,    the    sole 
brother    of    the    Bronte    sisters,    was   in   his 
boyhood  the  hope  and  darling  of  the  household,  but 
the  promise  of  his  early  years  was  lamentably  belied, 
and  he  died  prematurely,  an  intellectual,  as  well  as 
moral,  wreck.     It  seems  probable  that  the  seeds  of  a 
mutinous  and  wilful  disposition   soon  began  to  ger- 
minate in  him,  for  his  father,  in  a  letter  quoted  by 
Mrs.  Gaskell,    refers  to   him,  at   a  period  when  he 
cannot  have  been  more  than  eight  or  nine,  as  "  some- 
times a  naughty  boy."     A  father  does  not  incidentally 
describe  his  son  in  that  way  without  meaning  a  good 
deal.    Old  Bronte  mentions  that,  thinking  his  children 
knew  more  than  he  had  discovered,  he  put  to  them 
certain   questions,   which    they  were    encouraged   to 
answer  by  being  placed  behind  a  mask.     The  question 
addressed  to  his  son  was  singularly  inappropriate  to 
the  age  of  the  boy.     "  I  asked  Bran  well  what  was  the 
best  way  of  knowing  the  difference  between  the  in- 


Branwell  Bronte.  169 


tellects  of  man  and  woman ;  he  answered,  *  By  con- 
sidering the  difference  between  them  as  to  their 
bodies.'  "  As  Goethe  had  said  almost  exactly  the 
same  thing,  Branwell  may  be  supposed  to  have  picked 
up  the  saying  in  some  magazine ;  but  to  have  even 
noted  such  a  remark  at  his  age  proves  him,  unless  he 
spoke  merely  as  a  parrot,  to  have  been  a  precocious 
— perhaps  morbidly  precocious — boy.  There  is  reason 
to  believe  that  he  possessed  a  sufficient  aptitude  for 
drawing  and  painting  to  have  made  him,  under 
favourable  circumstances,  an  artist  of  distinction ; 
but  a  scheme  for  sending  him  to  study  in  the 
Koyal  Academy  miscarried;  and  his  general  educa- 
tion appears  to  have  been  desultory  and  imperfect. 
Probably  he  read  a  good  many  books,  and  he  learned 
to  write  in  prose  and  verse  with  facility.  This  sufficed 
to  make  him  a  wonder  among  the  rustics,  commercial 
travellers,  and  small  mill-owners  of  the  West  Eliding, 
and  it  is  distressing  to  hear  that,  when  the  landlord 
of  the  village  inn  had  his  room  tenanted  with  travellers 
or  topers,  he  used  to  send  for  young  Bronte  to  talk  and 
drink  with  them. 

Mr.  F.  H.  Grundy,  in  his  recently-published  Pictures 
of  the  Past,  after  declaring  that  Branwell  "  took  an 
unusual  fancy  "  to  himself,  and  that  he  (Mr.  Grundy) 
"continued,  perhaps,  his  most  confidential  friend 
through  good  and  ill  until  his  death,"  proceeds  to 
expatiate  on  his  "  wit,  brilliance,  attractiveness  ;  "  but 
it  would  not  take  much  of  these  qualities  to  produce 
an  impression  on  the  chance  guests  or  local  sots  of  the 


170  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

Haworth  Black  Bull  Inn  ;  and  nothing  could  be  more 
stupid  than  the  specimen  which  Mr.  Grundy  gives  of 
his  friend's  conversational  performances.  The  verses 
which  he  quotes  from  Bronte  are  also  excessively  poor, 
nor  is  there  anything  remarkable  in  the  extracts  from 
his  prose  letters.  "  Eemarkable,"  I  mean,  in  a  literary 
point  of  view ;  for  as  revelations  of  the  writer's  moral 
character,  they  are  remarkably  painful.  Mr.  Grundy 
talks  vaguely  of  the  injustice  done  to  his  friend  by 
Mrs.  Gaskell,  and  assumes  the  part  of  a  vindicator; 
but  the  result  of  his  communications,  whether  in  the 
form  of  his  own  remarks  or  in  that  of  extracts  from 
Bran  well's  letters,  is  to  convey  the  impression  of  a 
much  worse  man  than  we  derive  from.  Mrs.  Gas-ken"  s 
biography.  Mrs.  Gaskell  leaves  our  sentiment  of 
pity  comparatively  unrestrained  in  dealing  with  the 
sufferings  of  young  Bronte  ;  his  self-styled  vindicator 
arouses  the  sterner  sentiments  of  justice  and  indig- 
nation to  contemplate  a  merited  punishment.  We 
used  to  think  of  Branwell  as  a  good-natured,  weak- 
willed  lad,  who,  by  miscellaneous  reading,  had  turned 
his  mind  into  a  magazine  of  literary  curiosities,  who  in- 
herited from  his  father  the  gift  of  Hibernian  eloquence, 
who  was  enthusiastically  social,  and  who  thus  became 
first  the  idol  and  then  the  victim  of  a  circle  of  tipsy 
villagers.  But  Mr.  Grundy  quotes  Bronte  himself 
referring  to  "  the  grovelling  carelessness,  the  malig- 
nant yet  cold  debauchery,  the  determination  to  find 
how  far  mind  could  carry  body  without  both  being 
chucked  into  hell,"  which  marked  his  conduct  at 


Branwell  Bronte.  171 


a  time  when  he  had  undertaken  to  discharge  the 
duties  of  stationmaster  on  a  railway.  He  threw  (Mr. 
Grundy  tells  us)  all  the  work  on  a  porter,  while  he 
went  carousing  with  brother  sots,  and  "  serious  de- 
falcations "  were  the  consequence.  An  inquiry  fol- 
lowed; Bronte  was  acquitted  of  theft ;  "but,"  says 
his  vindicator,  "  was  convicted  of  constant  and 
culpable  carelessness." 

In  another  of  his  Grundy  letters,  Bronte  avows  a 
breach  of  trust  of  a  still  more  dark  and  treacherous 
nature.  He  says  that  for  years  he  was  on  terms  of 
disgraceful  intimacy  with  the  wife  of  a  gentleman 
in  whose  family  he  acted  as  tutor.  Mr.  Wemyss 
Reid  calls  attention  to  a  passage  in  Charlotte  Bronte's 
first  novel,  The  Professor,  in  which  this  circumstance 
is  alluded  to  in  terms  of  fervent  condemnation. 
"  Limited  as  had  yet  been  my  experience  of  life,  I 
had  once  had  the  opportunity  of  contemplating,  near 
at  hand,  an  example  of  the  results  produced  by  a 
course  of  interesting  and  romantic  domestic  treachery. 
No  golden  halo  of  fiction  was  about  this  example  :  I 
saw  it  bare  and  real,  and  it  was  very  loathsome.  I 
saw  a  mind  degraded  by  the  practice  of  mean  sub- 
terfuge, by  the  habit  of  perfidious  deception,  and  a 
body  depraved  by  the  infectious  influence  of  the  vice- 
polluted  soul.  I  had  suffered  much  from  the  forced 
and  prolonged  view  of  this  spectacle  :  those  sufferings 
I  did  not  now  regret,  for  their  simple  recollection 
acted  as  a  most  wholesome  antidote  to  temptation. 
They  had  inscribed  on  my  reason  the  conviction  that 


172  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

unlawful  pleasure,  trenching  on  another's  rights,  is 
delusive  and  envenomed  pleasure — its  hollowness  dis- 
appoints  at  the  time,  its  poison  cruelly  tortures  after- 
wards, its  effects  deprave  for  ever." 

In  his  nineteenth  year  (January,  1837),  Bran  well 
Bronte  sent  a  letter  to  Wordsworth,  enclosing  a 
sample  of  his  poetry.  It  is  unmistakable  that  the 
adulation  of  his  little  circle  had  already  mounted  to 
the  lad's  brain,  and  that  the  conceit  and  vanity  which 
at  this  age  are  of  evil  augury  were  in  a  high  state  of 
development.  "  My  aim,  sir,"  he  wrote,  "is  to  push 
out  into  the  open  world,  and  for  this  I  trust  not  poetry 
alone — that  might  launch  the  vessel,  but  could  not 
bear  her  on ;  sensible  and  scientific  prose,  bold  and 
vigorous  efforts  in  my  walk  of  life,  would  give  a 
farther  title  to  the  notice  of  the  world ;  and  then 
again  poetry  ought  to  brighten  and  crown  that  name 
with  glory ;  but  nothing  of  all  this  can  be  ever  begun 
without  means,  and  as  I  don't  possess  them,  I  must 
in  every  shape  strive  to  gain  them.  Surely,  in  this 
day,  when  there  is  not  a  writing  poet  worth  a  six- 
pence, the  field  must  be  open,  if  a  better  man  can 
step  forward."  Wordsworth  appears  to  have  taken 
no  notice  of  this  letter,  and  we  may  pretty  con- 
fidently conjecture  that  glancing  at  the  accom- 
panying verses,  and  finding  them  utterly  void  of 
merit,  he  put  both  letter  and  verses  aside,  with  a 
smile  of  serene  cynicism  at  the  idea  of  so  paltry  a 
rhymester  announcing  himself  as  the  probable  poet 
of  the  future. 


Charlotte  and  Southey.  173 

A  few  weeks  before  Branwell  wrote  to  Wordsworth, 
Charlotte  had  written  to  Southey.  Mrs.  Gaskell 
seems  to  have  seen  a  copy  of  the  letter,  for  she  says 
that  it  contained  "  some  high-flown  expressions,"  but 
she  annoyingly  withholds  it  from  her  readers.  She 
gives  us  Southey's  reply,  however,  and  it  is  worthy 
of  that  Bayard  of  literary  chivalry.  He  has  formed 
a  very  different  estimate  of  the  poetry  of  the  day 
from  that  of  the  stripling  of  nineteen,  who  told 
Wordsworth  that  not  a  writing  poet  was  worth  six- 
pence. "  Many  volumes  of.  poems,"  he  says,  "  are 
now  published  every  year  without  attracting  public 
attention,  any  one  of  which,  if  it  had  appeared  half  a 
century  ago,  would  have  obtained  a  high  reputation 
for  its  author."  Young  Bronte's  scornful  dismissal 
of  contemporary  poetry  as  beneath  notice  proves 
either  that  he  did  not  know  what  verse  was  being 
published,  and  therefore  spoke  with  mere  random 
impertinence,  or  that  he  had  no  critical  judgment. 
Since  Christopher  North  was  a  household  word  in 
Haworth  Parsonage,  and  a  copious  selection  from  the 
early  poems  of  Tennyson  had  been  printed  in  Black- 
wood  's  Magazine  in  North's  famous  critique  on  Ten- 
nyson, the  latter  seems  to  be  the  more  probable 
supposition.  The  puerile  arrogance,  which  had  no 
effect  upon  Wordsworth,  was  likely  to  be  very  im- 
posing in  the  eyes  of  Bronte's  audience  in  the  Black 
Bull  at  Haworth ;  for  arrogant  depreciation  of  others 
will  always  be  accepted  by  foolish  and  ignorant 
persons — that  is  to  say,  by  a  large  proportion  of 


174  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

mankind — as  proof  of  talent,  spirit,  and  accomplish- 
ment. 

While  writing  with  the  gentlest  consideration  for 
his  correspondent,  Southey  advised  Charlotte  to  banish 
every  idea  of  literature  as  a  profession,  and  to  indulge 
in  poetry  only  in  moments  of  perfect  leisure.  "I," 
he  wrote,  "  who  have  made  literature  my  profession, 
and  devoted  my  life  to  it,  and  have  never  for  a  moment 
repented  of  the  deliberate  choice,  think  myself,  never- 
theless, bound  in  duty  to  caution  every  young  man 
who  applies  as  an  aspirant  to  me  for  encouragement 
and  advice,  against  taking  so  perilous  a  course."  In 
many  letters  which  have  found  their  way  into  print, 
Mr.  Carlyle  has  expressed  a  similar  opinion  to  this  of 
South ey's ;  and  I  should  think  that  it  would  be 
endorsed  by  ninety-nine  out  of  every  hundred  men  and 
women  now  earning  their  bread  by  literature. 

After  pronouncing  somewhat  too  peremptorily,  that 
"  literature  cannot  be  the  business  of  a  woman's  life, 
and  it  ought  not  to  be,"  Southey  proceeds  to  say  that 
he  does  not  disparage  poetry,  or  forbid  its  cultivation. 
"  I  only  exhort  you  so  to  think  of  it,  and  so  to  use  it,  as 
to  render  it  conducive  to  your  own  permanent  good. 
Write  poetry  for  its  awn  sake — not  in  a  spirit  of 
emulation,  and  not  with  a  view  to  celebrity  ;  the  less 
you  aim  at  that  the  more  likely  you  will  be  to  deserve 
and  finally  to  obtain  it.  So  written,  it  is  wholesome 
both  for  the  heart  and  soul.  It  may  be  made  the 
surest  means,  next  to  religion,  of  soothing  the  mind 
and  elevating  it.  You  may  embody  in  it  your  best 


Charlotte  and  Southey.  175 

thoughts  and  your  wisest  feelings,  and  in  so  doing 
discipline  and  strengthen  them." 

Charlotte  replied  to  this  letter  with  all  the  home- 
bred warmth  of  feeling,  and  all  the  artless  simplicity, 
of  an  intelligent,  good-hearted  girl  of  twenty.  "  I 
cannot  rest,"  she  says,  "  till  I  have  answered  your 
letter,  even  though,  hy  addressing  you  a  second  time, 
I  should  appear  a  little  intrusive ;  but  I  must  thank 
you  for  the  kind  and  wise  advice  you  have  con- 
descended to  give  me."  She  sketches  her  present  life 
and  past  history  with  the  nicest  selection  of  the 
essential  points,  and  with  self-evidencing  fidelity  to 
truth  in  every  touch.  "  You  kindly  allow  me  to  write 
poetry  for  its  own  sake,  provided  I  leave  undone 
nothing  which  I  ought  to  do,  in  order  to  pursue  that 
single,  absorbing,  exquisite  gratification.  I  am  afraid, 
sir,  you  think  me  very  foolish.  I  know  the  first  letter 
I  wrote  to  you  was  all  senseless  trash  from  beginning 
to  end ;  but  I  am  not  altogether  the  idle  dreaming 
being  it  would  seem  to  denote.  My  father  is  a  clergy- 
man of  limited,  though  competent  income,  and  I  am 
the  eldest  of  his  children.  He  expended  quite  as 
much  in  my  education  as  he  could  afford  in  justice  to 
the  rest.  I  thought  it,  therefore,  my  duty,  when  I  left 
school,  to  become  a  governess.-  In  that  capacity  I  find 
enough  to  occupy  my  thoughts  all  day  long,  and  my 
head  and  hands,  too,  without  having  a  moment's  time 
for  one  dream  of  the  imagination.  In  the  evenings,  I 
confess,  I  do  think,  but  I  never  trouble  any  one  else 
with  my  thoughts.  I  carefully  avoid  any  appearance 


176  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 


of  pre-occupation  and  eccentricity,  which  might  lead 
those  I  live  amongst  to    suspect   the   nature   of  my 
pursuits.      Following  my  father's  advice — who  from 
my  childhood  has  counselled  me,  just  in  the  wise  and 
friendly  tone  of  your  letter — I  have  endeavoured  not 
only  attentively  to   observe  all  the  duties  a  woman 
ought  to  fulfil,  but  to  feel  deeply  interested  in  them. 
I   don't   always   succeed,   for    sometimes    when    I'm 
teaching   or   sewing   I   would   rather    be    reading   or 
writing;    but  I   try  to  deny  myself,  and  my  father's 
approbation    amply    rewards    me    for   the   privation. 
Once    more   allow  me   to   thank    you    with    sincere 
gratitude.    I  trust  I  shall  never  more  feel  ambitious  to 
see  my  name  in  print ;  if  the  wish  should  rise,  I'll  look 
at   Southey's  letter,  and   suppress  it.      It   is  honour 
enough  for  me  that  I  have  written  to  him,  and  received 
an  answer.     That  letter  is  consecrated ;  no  one  shall 
ever  see  it  but  papa  and  my  brother  and  sisters.   Again 
I  thank  you." 

The  naivete  of  this  is  delicious.  Fancy  the  future 
authoress  of  Jane  Eyre  and  Shirley  schooling  herself 
to  find  occupation  for  all  her  faculties  in  her  needle, 
and  calmly  resolving  never  to  think  of  seeing  her  name 
in  print.  A  dozen  years  after  she  wrote  thus, 
Charlotte  had  taken  her  place  with  acclamation 
among  the  world's  great  women.  The  kind-hearted, 
noble  Southey  was  evidently  struck  with  her  letter. 
He  replied  promptly  and  with  much  cordiality. 
"  Your  letter  has  given  me  great  pleasure,  and  I 
should  not  forgive  myself  if  I  did  not  tell  you  so. 


Branwell  Bronte.  177 

You  have  received  admonition  as  considerately  and  as 
kindly  as  it  was  given.  Let  me  now  request  that,  if 
you  ever  should  come  to  these  Lakes  while  I  am 
living  here,  you  will  let  me  see  you." 

There  is  one  sentence  in  Branwell  Bronte's  letter  to 
Wordsworth  which  has  a  mournful  significance.  He 
has,  he  says,  been  writing  a  poem,  in  which  he 
has  "striven  to  develop  strong  passions  and  weak 
principles  struggling  with  a  high  imagination  and 
acute  feelings,  till,  as  youth  hardens  towards  age,  evil 
deeds  and  short  enjoyments  end  in  mental  misery  and 
bodily  ruin."  The  words  are  a  prophecy  of  his  own 
fate.  I  have  said  that  his  conduct  became  such  as 
to  merit  the  sternest  reprobation;  but  his  fall  was 
due  to  his  misfortune  as  well  as  his  fault.  We  may 
believe  Mrs.  Gaskell  when  she  tells  us  that  his  im- 
pulses were  originally  praiseworthy,  and  that  he 
showed  strong  family  affection.  What  failed  him  was 
firm  and  judicious  discipline,  and  he  was  in  that 
situation  which,  beyond  all  others,  makes  want  of 
discipline  fatal.  He  was  an  only  son  in  a  family  of 
daughters,  brought  up  by  an  aunt  who  made  him  her 
favourite.  "There  are  always,"  says  Mrs.  Gaskell, 
"  peculiar  trials  in  the  life  of  an  only  boy  in  a  family 
of  girls.  He  is  expected  to  act  a  part  in  life  ;  to  do, 
while  they  are  only  to  be ;  and  the  necessity  of  their 
giving  way  to  him  in  some  things  is  too  often  ex- 
aggerated into  their  giving  way  to  him  in  all,  and  thus 
rendering  him  utterly  selfish."  Never  does  the  bitterest 
cruelty  disguise  itself  in  the  garb  of  kindness  so  signally 

12 


178  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

as  when  proud  parents  and  loving  sisters  enfeeble,  in  a 
son  and  brother,  that  moral  will  on  which  depends  all 
stability  of  character.  Never,  let  me  add,  was  the 
genial  and  guardian  influence  of  sound  moral  con- 
ditions, in  relation  to  youthful  genius,  more  pointedly 
illustrated  than  by  the  ruin  of  the  young  man,  and 
the  emergence  into  fame  of  the  young  women,  in  this 
"  family  of  poets." 

Branwell  went  from  bad  to  worse  until  he  fell  into 
the  criminal  degradation  on  which  Mr.  Grundy  has 
cast  so  dismal  a  light.  From  the  time  when  he  was 
dismissed  his  tutorship,  he  became  a  prey  to  the 
agonies  of  remorse  alternating  with  forced  outbursts 
of  mirth.  He  had  previously  given  way  to  intoxi- 
cation, he  now  became  an  opium-eater.  His 
constitution  gradually  broke  down,  and,  as  the  end 
approached,  he  proved  an  inexpressible  affliction  to  his 
old  father  and  his  sisters.  "  For  some  time,"  writes 
Mrs.  Gaskell,  "  before  his  death  he  had  attacks  of 
delirium  tremens  of  the  most  frightful  character ;  he 
slept  in  his  father's  room,  and  he  would  sometimes 
declare  that  either  he  or  his  father  should  be  dead 
before  the  morning.  The  trembling  sisters,  sick  with 
fright,  would  implore  their  father  not  to  expose 
himself  to  this  danger ;  but  Mr.  Bronte  is  no  timid 
man,  and  perhaps  he  felt  that  he  could  possibly 
influence  his  son  to  some  self-restraint,  more  by 
showing  trust  in  him  than  by  showing  fear.  The 
sisters  often  listened  for  the  report  of  a  pistol  in  the 
dead  of  the  night,  till  watchful  eye  and  hearkening 


Branwell's  Death.  179 

ear  grew  heavy  and  dull  with  the  perpetual  strain  upon 
their  nerves.  In  the  morning  young  Bronte  would 
saunter  out,  saying,  with  a  drunkard's  incontinence  of 
speech,  '  The  poor  old  man  and  I  have  had  a  terrible 
night  of  it ;  he  does  his  best — the  poor  old  man  !  but 
it's  all  over  with  me.' '  What  tragedy  could  be  more 
drearily  sad  than  that  ? 

Charlotte  and  her  sisters  endured  this  great 
calamity  with  heroic  fortitude.  When  Bran  well  died, 
the  feelings  with  which  they  had  regarded  him  in  his 
boyhood  returned,  and  not  an  angry  syllable  escaped 
from  Charlotte's  pen  when  she  chronicled  the  event. 
"  He  was  perfectly  conscious  till  the  last  agony  came 
on.  His  mind  had  undergone  the  peculiar  change 
which  frequently  precedes  death,  two  days  previously  ; 
the  calm  of  better  feelings  filled  it ;  a  return  of  natural 
affection  marked  his  last  moments.  He  is  in  God's 
hands  now  ;  and  the  All-Powerful  is  likewise  the  All- 
Merciful.  A  deep  conviction  that  he  rests  at  last — 
rests  well  after  his  brief,  erring,  suffering,  feverish  life 
— fills  and  quiets  my  mind  now.  The  final  separation, 
the  spectacle  of  his  pale  corpse,  gave  me  more  acute, 
bitter  pain  than  I  could  have  imagined.  Till  the  last 
hour  comes,  we  never  know  how  much  we  can  forgive, 
pity,  regret  a  near  relative.  All  his  vices  were  and  are 
nothing  now.  We  remember  only  his  woes."  He 
died  in  the  autumn  of  1848. 


12—2 


CHAPTEK  III. 

THE    POEMS    OF  CUEEEE,   ELLIS,  AND  ACTON 

BELL. 

BKANWELL  BKONTE  proving  a  scapegrace,  the 
three  sisters,  Charlotte,  Emily,  and  Anne, 
seem  to  have  let  him  pass  beyond  the  circle  of  their 
fellowship,  and  were  drawn  into  closer  and  intenser 
sympathy,  into  more  exclusive  and  close-knit  friend- 
ship, among  themselves,  than  could  well  have  linked 
them  together  if  their  brother  had  continued  to  occupy 
the  place  naturally  belonging  to  him  in  their  love  and 
esteem.  "  The  two  human  beings,"  wrote  Charlotte, 
after  the  deaths  of  Anne  and  Emily,  "  who  understood 
me,  and  whom  I  understood,  are  dead."  She  does  not 
hint  that  her  brother,  who  stood  next  to  her  in  the 
family,  ever  understood  her.  At  some  indefinite 
period  in  their  girlhood,  which  Charlotte  leaves  us  to 
guess  at  from  the  phrase,  "very  early,"  the  three 
sisters  discovered  that  they  possessed,  each  and  all, 
the  gift  of  literary  expression,  and  "  cherished  the 
dream  of  one  day  being  authors."  There  was 
motherly,  managing  Charlotte,  the  eldest ;  there  was 
modest,  nun-like  Anne,  the  youngest ;  and  between 
the  two,  different  from  both,  stood  the  deep-thinking, 


The  Three  Sisters.  181 

shy,  intense,  unsocial  Emily,  content  to  be  subordi- 
nate to  Charlotte  in  all  ordinary  matters,  leaning  upon 
ner — Emily  was  the  taller  and  thinner  of  the  two — 
in  walks,  and  trusting  to  her  to  do  all  the  speaking 
to  strangers,  but  hiding  in  her  own  breast  an  origi- 
nality weird  and  morbid,  yet  more  intrepid,  thorough- 
going, and  imaginative  even  than  Charlotte's. 

The  strange  girls  were  not  popular  with  their  neigh-  . 
bours.  Emily  in  particular  was  held  by  the  Haworth 
people  to  be  forbidding.  Their  personal  appearance 
— if  we  may  trust  Mr.  Grundy,  and  I  should  think 
that  on  such  a  point,  allowing  for  a  dash  of  flippancy 
and  caricature,  we  may  believe  him — was  not  attrac- 
tive. "Distant  and  distrait,  large  of  nose,  small  of 
figure,  red  of  hair,  prominent  of  spectacles ;  showing 
great  intellectual  development,  but  with  eyes  con- 
stantly cast  down,  very  silent,  painfully  retiring," — 
such  is  his  picture  of  the  group.  The  "  eyes  con- 
stantly cast  down"  I  cannot  but  think  apocryphal; 
Charlotte  at  least  could  hold  up  her  head  when  she 
chose ;  but  perhaps  the  sisters  did  not  experience  from 
the  presence  of  Mr.  Grundy  that  "  eye-brightening  " 
influence,  which  makes  "the  massed  clouds  roll"  from 
the  brow. 

An  honest  stationer  in  Haworth  gave  Mrs.  Gaskell 
a  much  kindlier  account  of  the  Misses  Bronte.  "  They 
used  to  buy  a  great  deal  of  writing-paper,"  he  said  ; 
and  he  would  "  wonder  whatever  they  did  with 
so  much."  When  out  of  paper  for  want  of  capital 
—"I  was  always,"  he  says,  "short  of  that"— he 


182  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

feared  their  coming,  "they  seemed  so  distressed  about 
it."  The  good-natured  fellow  would  walk  ten  miles 
"  for  half  a  ream  of  paper,"  rather  than  disappoint 
them.  "I  did  so  like  them  to  come,"  he  goes 
on,  "  when  I  had  anything  for  them ;  they  were 
so  much  different  te  anybody  else;  so  gentle  and 
kind,  and  so  very  quiet."  He  was  conscious  of 
no  repulsiveness  in  their  demeanour.  Charlotte, 
however,  seems  to  have  been  more  affable  than  the 
others.  She  "  sometimes  would  sit  and  inquire  about 
our  circumstances  so  kindly  and  feelingly."  We  may 
conclude,  therefore,  that  it  was  not  wholly,  if  at  all, 
from  their  unsociable  character,  but  because  they 
lacked  sympathetic  neighbours,  that  the  Bronte 
sisters  lived  so  recluse  a  life  at  Haworth. 

It  was  a  great  day  for  the  sisters  when,  in  the 
autumn  of  1845,  Charlotte  "  accidentally  lighted  on  a 
MS.  volume  of  verse  "  in  Emily's  handwriting.  "  Of 
course,"  she  says,  "  I  was  not  surprised,  knowing 
that  she  could  and  did  write  verse.  I  looked  it  over, 
and  something  more  than  surprise  seized  me — a  deep 
conviction  that  these  were  not  common  effusions,  nor 
at  all  like  the  poetry  women  generally  write.  I 
thought  them  condensed  and  terse,  vigorous  and 
genuine.  To  my  ear  they  had  also  a  peculiar  music, 
wild,  melancholy,  and  elevating."  So  far  as  it  goes, 
this  is  a  singularly  just  critique  of  Emily's  poems;  but 
it  does  not  go  beyond  the  record  of  a  first  impression. 

Anne,  finding  that  the  great  critical  authority  of  the 
household  smiled  approval  on  Emily,  now  announced 


Planning  Their  Volume.  183 

that  she  also  had  composed  poems.  They  were 
produced,  and  again  the  judgment  proved  favourable. 
"I  thought,"  says  Charlotte,  "that  these  verses  too 
had  a  sweet,  sincere  pathos  of  their  own."  If  to 
"  sweet,  sincere  pathos "  we  add  unaffected  and 
graceful  feeling,  and  correct,  easy,  not  unmelodious 
versification,  we  have  almost  a  sufficient  account  of 
Anne  Bronte's  poems. 

The  poetical  powers  of  Charlotte  seem  to  have  been 
already  known  in  the  household,  and  the  three  sisters 
now  formed  the  project  of  publishing  a  selection  of 
their  poems.  It  is  a  striking  illustration  of  the  state 
of  severance  and  solitude,  in  relation  both  to  their 
father  and  their  brother,  in  which  these  girls  lived, 
that  neither  Bran  well  nor  Mr.  Bronte  was  consulted 
as  to  the  merit  of  the  poems,  or  taken  into  the  secret 
of  publication.  A  special  pathos  is  shed  upon  this 
state  of  affairs  by  the  fact  that  the  father  had  himself, 
as  we  saw,  published  poetry. 

But  what  reader  with  any  tincture  of  sensibility  and 
imagination  can  altogether  fail  to  realise  the  situation 
of  the  sisters  under  these  new  circumstances?  How 
keen  would  be  the  interest  imparted  to  their  whole 
life  !  How  "  fluttering-fain,"  to  use  a  fine  imaginative 
epithet  from  their  father's  first  volume,  would  be  their 
hearts,  as  poem  after  poem  was  submitted  to  the 
critical  conclave  for  selection  or  rejection  !  How  their 
eyes  would  glisten  when  they  dared  to  look  towards 
the  future,  and  when  hope  suffused  the  horizon  with 
auroral  tints  of  fame,  fortune,  enlargement — a  vision 


184  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

on  which  they  would  not  trust  themselves  to  dwell 
often  or  long,  but  which  was  quite  sure  to  present 
itself  at  moments  to  gifted  and  aspiring  women.  Their 
complete  isolation  would  enhance  their  joy ;  the  moan- 
ing of  the  frozen  wind  of  the  moors  around  their  little 
fire  brightening  the  glow  of  it  upon  their  faces.  Then 
there  was  much  to  be  excogitated,  many  letters  to  be 
written.  Our  good  Haworth  friend  of  the  limited  capital 
would  find  his  boot-leather  sorely  taxed.  They  had  an 
idea  that  the  world  looks  unfavourably  upon  writing 
women,  yet  shrank  from  anything  like  a  positive  act 
of  falsification,  and  therefore  hunted  up  three  names 
which  no  mortal  could  assign  expressly  to  the  one  sex 
or  the  other — Currer,  Ellis,  and  Acton.  The  choice 
could  not  have  been  more  felicitously  mystifying,  and 
the  rather  common  surname  Bell  would  naturally 
suggest  a  plebeian  father,  of  high-flying  temperament, 
who  had  given  three  out-of-the-way  names  to  his 
sons.  There  were  publishers  to  be  corresponded  with, 
questions  of  expense  to  be  considered,  the  father's 
surprise,  when  the  postman  brought  a  letter  addressed 
to  Currer  Bell,  Esquire,  to  be  obviated,  and  at  last 
proofs  to  be  corrected.  It  is  in  experiences  like  these 
that  life  becomes  precious,  that  friendship  and  the 
affection  of  close  relationship  combine  to  pour  the 
elixir  of  pure  and  tingling  joy  along  the  veins.  In 
those  weeks  of  cosing  and  conspiring  over  their 
grand  ploy,  England,  we  may  be  sure,  did  not  hold 
many  happier  groups  than  that  of  the  three  Bronte 
sisters. 


The  Poems  Are  Published.  185 

The  volume  was  published  in  1846  by  Messrs. 
Aylott  and  Jones,  London.  Its  interest  depends 
mainly  on  the  self-portraiture  of  the  authors,  of  which, 
indeed,  it  may  be  said  to  consist.  Anne's  verses 
exhibit  a  devout,  sincere,  and  tender  nature,  chastened 
by  religious  melancholy.  Her  mood,  as  Charlotte 
says,  was  that  of  "  perpetual  pensiveness."  "  The 
pillar  of  a  cloud  glided  constantly  before  her  eyes ; 
she  ever  waited  at  the  foot  of  a  secret  Sinai,  listening 
in  her  heart  to  the  voice  of  a  trumpet,  sounding  long 
and  waxing  louder."  Patrick  Bronte  seerns  to  have 
been  what  would  now  be  considered  a  rigid  Calvinist, 
taking  the  pessimist  rather  than  the  equally  logical 
optimist  view  of  the  Augustinian  system ;  and  the  idea 
of  God  as  an  inexorable  Fate  cast  a  deep  shadow  over 
the  minds  of  the  three  sisters,  but  especially  of  Anne. 
It  is  consoling  to  learn  that,  "in  her  last  moments,  this 
tyranny  of  a  too  tender  conscience  was  overcome  ;  this 
pomp  of  terrors  broke  up,  and,  passing  away,  left  her 
dying  hour  unclouded."  The  invincible  goodness  of 
her  nature,  the  importunate  kindness  of  her  heart, 
are  pathetically  shown  by  her  rebellion  against  that 
harshest  of  all  dogmas  which  affirms  not  only  that  a 
large  proportion  of  mankind  are  consigned  to  eternal 
torment,  but  that  it  is  the  duty  of  humble  souls  to 
rejoice  in  this  arrangement.  A  few  stanzas  from  the 
poem,  which  she  calls  A  Word  to  the  "Elect"  will 
explain  her  position. 

You  may  rejoice  to  think  yourselves  secure ; 

You  may  be  grateful  for  the  gift  divine — 
That  grace  unsought,  which  made  your  black  hearts  pure, 

And  fits  your  earth-born  souls  in  Heaven  to  shine. 


186  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

But  is  it  sweet  to  look  around,  and  view 

Thousands  excluded  from  that  happiness 
Which  they  deserved,  at  least,  as  much  as  you, — 

Their  faults  not  greater,  nor  their  virtues  less  ? 

And,  wherefore  should  your  hearts  more  grateful  prove, 
Because  for  ALL  the  Saviour  did  not  die  ? 

Is  yours  the  God  of  justice  and  of  love  ? 
And  are  your  bosoms  warm  with  charity  ? 

And  when  you,  looking  on  your  fellow-men, 

Behold  them  doomed  to  endless  misery, 
How  can  you  talk  of  joy  and  rapture  then  ? — 

May  God  withhold  such  cruel  joy  from  me ! 

And  oh !  there  lives  within  my  heart 

A  hope,  long  nursed  by  me  ; 
(And  should  its  cheering  ray  depart, 

How  dark  my  soul  would  be !) 

That  as  in  Adam  all  have  died, 

In  Christ  shall  all  men  live  ; 
And  ever  round  His  throne  abide, 

Eternal  praise  to  give. 

The  sadness  which  pervades  Anne's  poems  renders 
them,  however,  on  the  whole,  oppressive  and  un- 
healthy. Only  once  do  I  observe  that  she  breaks  into 
a  strain  of  jubilation,  a  high  wind  in  a  wood  dissipating 
for  a  moment  the  gloom  of  her  spirit. 

My  soul  is  awakened,  my  spirit  is  soaring, 

And  carried  aloft  on  the  wings  of  the  breeze ; 
For  above  and  around  me  the  wild  wind  is  roaring, 

Arousing  to  rapture  the  earth  and  the  seas. 
The  long  withered  grass  in  the  sunshine  is  glancing, 

The  bare  trees  are  tossing  their  branches  on  high ; 
The  dead  leaves  beneath  them  are  merrily  dancing, 

The  white  clouds  are  scudding  across  the  blue  sky. 

Charlotte's  own  poems,  though  much  less  restricted 
in  idea  than  those  of  her  youngest  sister,  are  not  of 


Charlotte's  Verses.  187 

much  value.  Both  sisters  are  accomplished  versifiers 
and  have  command  of  clear  and  vivid  words,  but  both 
fail  in  imagination,  in  variety  of  colour,  and  in  passion. 
This,  from  Pilate's  Wife's  Dream,  by  Charlotte,  is  a 
tolerable  stanza,  but  the  piece,  as  a  whole,  is  disap- 
pointing. 

The  world  advances ;  Greek  or  Eoman  rite 
Suffices  not  the  inquiring  mind  to  stay  ; 

The  searching  soul  demands  a  purer  light 
To  guide  it  on  its  upward,  onward  way  : 

Ashamed  of  sculptured  gods,  Eeligion  turns 

To  where  the  unseen  Jehovah's  altar  burns. 

The  lines  entitled  Preference  are  eloquent  rather 
than  poetical ;  they  read  like  an  average  passage  from 
Jane  Eyre  or  Shirley  finely  versified ;  but  they  have 
this  potent  interest,  that  they  present  us  with  a 
brilliant  sketch,  from  her  own  hand,  of  the  kind  of 
man  whom  Charlotte  Bronte,  in  her  years  of  brightest 
womanhood,  would  have  loved.  She  first  dismisses 
the  man  whom  she  could  not  love,  telling  him  not  to 
flatter  himself  that  he  has  made  the  least  impression. 

Why  that  smile  ?     Thou  now  art  deeming 

This  my  coldness  all  untrue, 
But  a  mask  of  frozen  seeming, 

Hiding  secret  fires  from  view. 
Touch  my  hand,  thou  self-deceiver  ; 

Nay — be  calm,  for  I  am  so : 
Does  it  burn  ?     Does  my  lip  quiver  ? 

Has  mine  eye  a  troubled  glow  ? 

She  grants  no  refuge  to  his  amour  propre  in  the 
notion  that  perhaps,  if  she  will  not  have  him,  she  will 
have  no  one. 


188  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

Can  I  love  ?     Oh,  deeply — truly — 

Warmly — fondly — but  not  thee ; 
And  my  love  is  answered  duly, 

With  an  equal  energy. 
Would'st  thou  see  thy  rival  ?     Hasten 

Draw  that  curtain  soft  aside, 
Look  where  yon  thick  branches  chasten 

Noon,  with  shades  of  eventide. 
In  that  glade,  where  foliage  blending 

Forms  a  green  arch  overhead, 
Sits  thy  rival,  thoughtful  bending 

O'er  a  stand  with  papers  spread — 
Motionless,  his  fingers  plying 

That  untired,  unresting  pen  ; 
Time  and  tide  unnoticed  flying, 

There  he  sits — the  first  of  men ! 
Man  of  conscience —  man  of  reason  ; 

Stern,  perchance,  but  ever  just ; 
Foe  to  falsehood,  wrong,  and  treason, 

Honour's  shield  and  virtue's  trust. 
Worker,  thinker,  firm  defender 

Of  Heaven's  truth — man's  liberty; 
Soul  of  iron — proof  to  slander, 

Eock  where  founders  tyranny. 
Fame  he  seeks  not — but  full  surely 

She  will  seek  him  in  his  horde  ; 
This  I  know,  and  wait  securely 

For  the  atoning  hour  to  come — 
To  that  man  my  faith  is  given. 

There  is  better  poetry  than  this  in  Charlotte  Bronte's 
prose  ;  but  it  would  be  hard  to  refuse  one  whose 
strongest  feelings  take  so  naturally  and  flowingly  the 
garment  of  verse  the  name  of  poet. 

I  have  never  changed  the  opinion,  formed  and  ex- 
pressed by  me  many  years  ago,  that  the  poems  of 
Emily  Bronte  excel  those  of  her  sisters.  They  are 
superior  in  occasional  splendour  and  concentrated 


Emily's  Poems.  189 


force  of  expression ;  in  serene  intensity ;  in  pene- 
tration and  power  of  thought.  Take  as  a  sample  of 
her  gift  of  expression  the  following  poem, — I  omit  a 
few  of  the  stanzas. 

STARS. 

Ah !  why,  because  the  dazzling  sun 

Restored  our  earth  to  joy, 
Have  you  departed,  every  one, 

And  left  a  desert  sky  ? 
All  through  the  night,  your  glorious  eyes 

Were  gazing  down  in  mine, 
And,  with  a  full  heart's  thankful  sighs, 

I  blessed  that  watch  divine. 
I  was  at  peace,  and  drank  your  beams 

As  they  were  life  to  me  ; 
And  revelled  in  my  changeful  dreams 

Like  petrel  on  the  sea. 
Why  did  the  morning  dawn  to  break 

So  great,  so  pure  a  spell ; 
And  scorch  with  fire  the  tranquil  cheek, 

Where  your  cool  radiance  fell  ? 
Blood-red,  he  rose,  and,  arrow-straight, 

His  fierce  beams  struck  my  brow  ; 
The  soul  of  nature  sprang,  elate, 

But  mine  sank  sad  and  low  ! 
My  lids  closed  down,  yet  through  their  veil 

I  saw  him,  blazing  still. 
And  steep  in  gold  the  misty  dale, 

And  flash  upon  the  hill. 
Oh,  stars,  and  dreams,  and  gentle  night ! 

Oh,  night  and  stars  return  ! 
And  hide  me  from  the  hostile  light, 

That  does  not  warm,  but  burn ; 
That  drains  the  blood  of  suffering  men  ; 

Drinks  tears,  instead  of  dew ; 
Let  me  sleep  through  his  blinding  reign, 

And  only  wake  with  you ! 


190  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

The  second  of  these  verses  expresses  a  thought 
which  certainly  is  not  new,  but  no  thought  could  be 
more  beautiful  or  more  imaginative ;  the  fifth  is  superb 
in  its  brevity  and  concentration, — in  its  burst  of  colour, 
its  blaze  of  light :  we  feel  ourselves  flooded  with  the 
crimson  of  dawn.  Charlotte  has  once  or  twice  written 
as  finely  in  prose  ;  never  in  verse. 

Lovely  also,  with  a  grave,  high,  solemn  loveliness, 
especially  towards  its  close,  is  the  poem  entitled 
A  Death  Scene.  The  lady  hangs  over  her  dying  lover 
while  the  sun  is  high  and  the  west  winds  are  blowing, 
and  entreats  him  not  to  yield  to  death.  But  a  glance 
that  rebuked  her  for  yielding  weakly  to  her  woe,  "  one 
mute  look  of  suffering,"  moved  her  to  repent  her 
prayer.  She  grew  calm.  No  sign  of  further  grieving 
stirred  her  soul.  The  last  hour  came. 

Paled,  at  length,  the  sweet  sun  setting; 

Sunk  to  peace  the  twilight  breeze  : 
Summer  dews  fell  softly,  wetting 

Glen,  and  glade,  and  silent  trees. 

Then  his  eyes  began  to  weary, 

Weighed  beneath  a  mortal  sleep  ; 
And  their  orbs  grew  strangely  dreary, 

Clouded,  even  as  they  would  weep. 

But  they  wept  not,  but  they  changed  not, 
Never  moved,  and  never  closed ; 

Troubled  still,  and  still  they  ranged  not- 
Wandered  not,  nor  yet  reposed. 

So  I  knew  that  he  was  dying — 
Stooped,  and  raised  his  languid  head ; 

Felt  no  breath,  and  heard  no  sighing, 
So  I  knew  that  he  was  dead. 


Belief  and  Unbelief.  191 

But  the  most  important  of  Emily  Bronte's  poems — 
the  most  original  in  thought,  the  most  powerful  in 
imagination,  the  most  intensely  sincere  and  im- 
passioned in  feeling — is  one  too  vaguely  called  The 
Philosopher.  It  consists  of  an  interchange  of  con- 
fidences "between  two  sages,  or  two  personified  moods 
of  the  same  sage,  on  the  question  of  questions, — God 
or  no  God  ?  The  one  sage  believes  ;  the  other,  to 
say  the  least,  hesitates.  The  second  sage  has  the  last 
word,  and  this  appears  to  show  that  the  position  he 
takes  up  is  adopted  by  the  author.  Let  us  hear  first 
the  believing  sage. 

"  I  saw  a  Spirit,  standing,  man, 

Where  them  dost  stand — an  hour  ago, 
And  round  his  feet  three  rivers  ran, 

Of  equal  depth  and  equal  flow — 
A  golden  stream — and  one  of  blood — 

And  one  of  sapphire  seemed  to  be  ; 
But  when  they  joined  their  triple  flood 

It  tumbled  in  an  inky  sea. 
The  Spirit  sent  his  dazzling  gaze 

Down  through  that  ocean's  gloomy  night ; 
Then,  kindling  all,  with  sudden  blaze, 

The  glad  deep  sparkled  wide  and  bright — 
White  as  the  sun,  far,  far  more  fair 
Than  its  divided  sources  were  !  " 

Such  is  the  statement  of  his  experience,  such  the 
profession  of  his  faith,  by  the  believer  in  God. 
Observe  the  imaginative  grandeur,  combined  with 
intellectual  subtlety,  of  the  similitude  made  use  of. 
Every  painter  knows  that  the  three  primitive  colours, 
red,  yellow,  blue — here  represented  by  blood,  gold,  and 


192  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

sapphire — yield,  when  mingled,  an  "  inky,"  or,  at 
least,  brown-black  tint.  Yet  out  of  those  same  colours, 
linked  in  celestial  harmony,  arises  the  pure  white 
light.  The  seer,  the  proclaimer  of  faith  in  God, 
avers  that,  while  he  looked  upon  the  colours  mixing  in 
the  blackness  of  chaos — the  blackness  of  matter — the 
blackness  of  an  universal  inky  ocean  unvisited  by 
light — he  saw  a  Spirit  send  from  His  eye  an  irradia- 
ting beam,  which  turned  blackness  into  beauty  and 
night  into  day,  kindling  the  universe  with  sudden 
blaze  of  order,  life,  and  joy.  That  Spirit  was  God. 

To  have  devised  and  worked  out  a  conception  like 
this  would  have  satisfied  almost  any  woman-poet  that 
ever  lived ;  but  it  is  only  the  prelude  to  what  Emily 
Bronte  has  to  say.  She  has  uttered  the  challenge  : 
now  for  the  reply.  It  is  the  philosophical  sceptic,  the 
representative  of  earnest  doubt,  that  speaks. 

"  And  even  for  that  Spirit,  seer, 

I've  watched  and  sought  my  lifetime  long ; 
Sought  Hun  in  heaven,  hell,  earth,  and  air, 

An  endless  search,  and  always  wrong. 
Had  I  but  seen  His  glorious  eye 

Once  light  the  clouds  that  wilder  me, 
I  ne'er  had  raised  this  coward  cry 

To  cease  to  think  and  cease  to  be  ; 
I  ne'er  had  called  oblivion  blest, 

Nor,  stretching  eager  hands  to  death, 
Implored  to  change  for  senseless  rest 

This  sentient  soul,  this  living  breath. 
Oh,  let  me  die  ! — that  power  and  will 

Their  cruel  strife  may  close  ; 
And  conquered  good,  and  conquering  ill, 

Be  lost  in  one  repose  !  " 


The  Last  Word  of  Doubt.  193 

To  this  Emily  Bronte  gives  no  answer.  By  all 
rules  of  interpretation,  the  speaker  must  be  held  to 
stand  for  the  poet.  It  seems,  therefore,  to  be  Emily 
Bronte  who,  deliberately  and  intensely,  but  without  the 
remotest  suggestion  of  irreverence,  affirms  that  she 
has  looked  for  the  Spirit  announced  by  the  seer  who 
spoke  first,  and  has  not  seen  Him.  One  glimpse,  she 
says,  would  have  been  enough,  but  that  one  glimpse 
she  did  not  obtain  ;  and  in  colossal  sincerity,  though 
with  unspeakable  distress,  she  turns  to  the  universe, 
which  is  for  her  a  grave,  and  accepts  the  eternal  death 
that  is  her  portion.  Whether  it  is  in  the  mere 
dramatic  sympathy  of  an  artist  that  Emily  Bronte 
puts  words  into  the  mouth  of  the  philosopher;  or 
whether  the  words  are  her  own,  and  reveal  a  secret 
that  might  throw  some  light  on  her  stern,  reserved, 
ungenial  existence,  and  on  the  mood  of  mind  in  which 
Wuthering  Heights  was  composed ; — I  shall  not  under- 
take to  decide. 

I  confess,  however,  that  I  look  upon  the  second  of 
these  hypotheses  as  in  a  high  degree  probable.  THe 
verses  come,  if  ever  verses  came,  from  the  heart, 
and  I  cannot  help  thinking  that  the  fire  within  them 
searched  with  its  burnings  the  soul  of  Emily  Bronte. 
Charlotte,  I  fancy,  never  fathomed  the  depths  of  her 
sister's  mind.  At  all  events,  the  girl  who  wrote  these 
stanzas  had  uttered  the  last  and  deepest  word  that  has 
been  spoken,  or  can  rationally  be  spoken,  by  modern 
doubt.  "Show  us" — this  is  the  challenge  of  the 
Tyndalls,  the  John  Morleys — "any  glittering  upon 

13 


194  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

the   clouds   of   nature  that   proceeds   from   a  Divine 
Eye,    any  force,   influence,   power,   in   or   upon   this 
all- comprehending    nature,   which  is    not    part    and 
parcel  of  nature  itself,  of    nature  everlastingly   self- 
produced  and  self-swallowed,  which  is  in  any  sense 
above  or  beyond,  or  dynamically  distinguishable  from 
nature,  and  with  which  man  can  enter  into  communi- 
cation ;  and  we  will  believe."    Thrice  blessed  are  they 
who  can  solemnly,  and  in  all  the  calmness  of  intelligent 
faith,  believe  that  God  has  given  them  such  a  glance 
of    His   eye   that   they   cannot   but   believe    in    His 
existence ;  but  it  may  be  doubted  whether  the  reason 
of  their  faith  admits  of  being  presented  in  a  logically 
unassailable  form.      On   the   other  hand,  those   who 
refuse  to  believe  may  be  expected  to  admit  that  their 
negation  is  purely  personal,  that  they  are  not  justified 
in  converting  it  into  a  positive  and  generalised  state- 
ment, and   that  they  ought    to    weigh  fairly,  in  the 
opposite   scale,   the    deliberate   assertion   of    tens    of 
thousands  of  the  best  and  wisest  representatives    of 
the  species,  that  God  has  spoken  to  them.     To  the 
individual  testimony,  also,  must  in  fairness  be  added 
the   testimony   of  the    race,   a  testimony  in  which, 
Hume  being  judge,  all  ages  and  tribes  are  unanimous, 
a  testimony  so  decisively  signalising  man  as  the  wor- 
shipping animal,  the  creature  that,  on  nature's  highest 
pinnacle,  opens  his  eye  on  God,  that  Auguste  Comte 
can  find  no  basis  of  possible  organisation  for  human 
society   except  a  religious  basis.     Why,   if  evolution 
be   true,    should   the    supreme   and   ultimate    fact   of 


Unwilling  Doubt.  195 


evolution  be  denied?  Why,  when  man,  the  Colum- 
bus of  the  universe,  has  caught  sight  of  the  Divine 
and  Eternal  continents  of  spiritual  existence,  should 
they  be  perversely  declared  to  be  but  sun-gilt  mist  ? 

This,  however,  we  may  hold  with  all  clearness  and 
decision,  that  when  one  does,  as  Emily  Bronte  did, 
and  as  the  poet  Cowper  still  more  conspicuously  did, 
thirst  after  God  with  genuine  and  impassioned  long- 
ing, the  hiding  of  His  countenance  is  but  apparent 
— a  physical  clouding  of  the  brain — and  is  not  only 
not  identical  with,  but  essentially  opposite  to,  that 
sensual  and  self-satisfied  atheism,  that  brutish  in- 
difference to  ideal  aims  and  disinterested  virtues, 
that  rancorous  mutiny  against  law  and  order,  which 
is  moral  death. 


13—2 


CHAPTEK  IV. 

WUTHEEING  HEIGHTS— ME.  GEUNDY  ON  ITS 
A  UTHOESHIP—THE  EXTEAOEDINAET  CHAE- 
ACTEE  OF  THE  BOOK. 

THE  poems  of  the  Bronte  sisters,  published  anony- 
mously at  their  own  expense,  shared  the  fate 
which  has  generally  attended  books  in  which  the  pub- 
lishers have  had  no  interest.  Many  anonymous  books 
have  succeeded,  many  books  by  young  and  unprac- 
tised writers  have  succeeded,  but  books  published 
by  authors  at  their  own  expense  are  the  pariahs  of 
literature.  These  brave  girls,  however,  were  not  cast 
down,  "Ill-success,"  says  Charlotte,  "failed  to  crush 
us  :  the  mere  effort  to  succeed  had  given  a  wonderful 
zest  to  existence ;  it  must  be  pursued."  They  resolved 
that  their  next  venture  should  be  in  prose.  Charlotte 
produced  The  Professor,  Anne  Agnes  Grey,  the  re- 
served, deep-thoughted,  brooding  Emily  WutJiering 
Heights.  Of  the  first  I  shall  have  something  to  say 
in  connection  with  Charlotte's  last  novel,  Villette. 
The  second  I  attempted  to  read,  many  years  ago,  but 
failed.  Wuthering  Heights  is  one  of  the  most  remark- 
able of  all  the  Bronte  books,  and  derives  an  interest 
almost  poignantly  keen  from  its  relation  to  the 


Mr.  Grundy  on  Wuthering  Heights.          197 

character   of    Emily   Bronte.      It  must   be   carefully 
examined. 

Before  taking  up  the  book  I  am  forced,  not  without 
considerable  reluctance,  to  put  out  of  the  way  a 
statement  respecting  it  made  by  Mr.  F.  H.  Grundy, 
whose  unparalleled  "vindication"  of  poor  Branwell 
Bronte  I  formerly  referred  to.  Mr.  Grundy  observes 
"that  the  question  of  the  authorship  of  Wuthering 
Heights  has  long  vexed  the  critics."  This  is  new  to 
me.  When  Wuthering  Heights  appeared,  many  people 
thought  that  it  was  by  the  author  of  Jane  Eyre, 
which  had  been  published  a  few  months  earlier.  On 
this  misconception  Charlotte  wrote  as  follows : — 
"  Unjust  and  grievous  error !  We  laughed  at  it  at 
first,  but  I  deeply  lament  it  now."  Such  a  report 
would  naturally  pain  the  true  author,  and  Char- 
lotte did  justice  to  her  sister  by  saying,  with  brief 
precision,  "  Ellis  Bell  produced  Wuthering  Heights." 
Since  these  words  were  printed,  no  critic  has  been 
"vexed"  by  doubt  or  question  as  to  the  authorship 
of  the  novel.  But  Mr.  Grundy  makes  this  startling 
averment :  "  Patrick  Bronte  declared  to  me,  and  what 
his  sister  said  bore  out  the  assertion,  that  he  wrote  a 
great  portion  of  Wuthering  Heights  himself.  Indeed, 
it  is  impossible  for  me  to  read  that  story  without 
meeting  with  many  passages  which  I  feel  certain  must 
have  come  from  his  pen.  The  weird  fancies  of  dis- 
eased genius  with  which  he  used  to  entertain  me  in 
our  long  talks  at  Luddendenfoot,  reappear  in  the 
pages  of  the  novel,  and  I  am  inclined  to  believe  that 


198  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

the   very  plot   was    his    invention    rather   than    his 
sister's." 

Mr.  Grundy's  book  was  published  in  1879.  The 
statements  which  he  imputes  to  Branwell  Bronte  can- 
not have  been  made  less  than  thirty-one  years  before 
that  date.  Mr.  Grundy  has  lived  a  roving  life,  traversing 
first  England  and  then  Australia  in  the  exercise  of  his 
profession  as  an  engineer,  and  it  is  no  discredit  to  him 
that  his  memory  should  have  become  confused  as  to 
the  particulars  of  conversations  that  took  place,  in  or 
before  1848,  between  him  and  young  Bronte.  It  would 
be  painful  to  think  that  the  latter  laid  claim  to  the 
authorship  of  Wuthering  Heights,  for  if  he  did,  he 
must  have  spoken  falsely.  Not  a  line  of  his  composi- 
tion, whether  in  prose  or  in  verse,  exhibits  a  glimpse  of 
such  power  as  appears  everywhere  in  the  novel.  The 
negative  proof  against  him  is  singularly  complete  and 
convincing.  Neither  in  his  own  letters,  nor  in  Mrs. 
Gaskell's  biography,  nor  in  Charlotte's  account  of  the 
origin  of  Wuthering  Heights,  is  there  a  trace  of  evi- 
dence that  he  was  ever  associated  with  his  sisters  in 
their  literary  enterprises.  We  hear  of  him  as  having 
been  an  usher  in  a  school,  a  private  tutor,  a  portrait- 
painter,  trying  to  establish  himself  at  Bradford,  all 
before  he  was  twenty-two.  At  twenty-two  he  is  at 
Luddendenfoot,  astonishing  Mr.  Grundy  by  his  conver- 
sation, neglecting  his  duties,  carousing  with  worthless 
companions,  and  conducting  himself,  on  the  whole,  dis- 
gracefully. It  is  hardly  conceivable  that  the  drunken 
station-master  should  have  told  Mr.  Grundy  that  he 


Authorship  of   Wuthering  Heights.  199 

had  written  part  of  the  novel  which,  six  or  seven  years 
later,  Emily  Bronte  was  to  publish  as  her  own.  When 
Bronte  left  Luddendenfoot,  Mr.  Grundy  lost  sight  of 
him  for  three  years ;  in  Bronte's  letters  which  followed 
the  resumption  of  their  intercourse,  and  from  which 
Mr.  Grundy  prints  several  extracts,  there  is  not  a  hint 
that  he  is  author  of  Wuthering  Heights,  or  that  he  has 
the  slightest  knowledge  of  the  literary  activity  of  his 
sisters.  In  the  interval  he  had  been  dismissed  in  pro- 
found disgrace  from  his  second  tutorship;  and  had  re- 
turned, broken-hearted,  to  Haworth.  At  the  time  when 
Charlotte,  Emily,  and  Anne  were  preparing  first  their 
poems  and  then  their  prose  tales  for  the  press,  he  was 
sinking  into  the  grave,  ruined  in  body  and  soul,  inca- 
pable of  mental  work  of  any  kind,  and  no  more  fit  to 
write  Wuthering  Heights  than  Homer's  Iliad.  There 
was  thus  really  no  period  in  his  history,  so  far  as  I  can 
trace  it,  at  which  he  could  have  written  any  part  of 
Wuthering  Heights.  That  book  is  perfectly  homo- 
geneous in  thought,  feeling,  and  style,  and  pointedly 
evinces  itself  the  work  of  one  mind  and  one  pen.  It 
was  produced  by  Emily  Bronte,  and  by  her  alone.  By 
a  strange  and  sad  caprice  of  fate,  her  work  was  claimed 
for  her  sister  during  her  life-time,  and  for  her  brother 
after  her  death. 

Charlotte's  criticism  of  her  sister's  novel  is  interest- 
ing and  able,  but  somewhat  perplexing.  She  first 
alleges  that  the  characters  delineated  in  Wuthering 
Heights  are  true  to  nature,  and  then  surprises  us  by  the 
announcement  that  her  sister  knew  nothing  personally 


200  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

about  the  originals  that  suggested  them.  Setting  out 
with  the  remark  that  to  those  who  are  unfamiliar  with 
"  the  inhabitants,  the  customs,  the  natural  character- 
istics of  the  outlying  hills  and  hamlets  in  the  West 
Eiding  of  Yorkshire,"  the  book  "  must  appear  a  rude 
and  strange  production,"  Charlotte  proceeds  : — "  Men 
and  women,  who,  perhaps  naturally  very  calm,  and  with 
feelings  moderate  in  degree,  and  little  marked  in  kind, 
have  been  trained  from  their  cradle  to  observe  the 
utmost  evenness  of  manner  and  guardedness  of  lan- 
guage, will  hardly  know  what  to  make  of  the  rough, 
strong  utterance,  the  harshly-manifested  passions,  the 
unbridled  aversions  and  headlong  partialities,  of  unlet- 
tered moorland  hinds  and  rugged  moorland  squires, 
who  have  grown  up*  untaught  and  unchecked,  except 
by  mentors  as  harsh  as  themselves."  This  clearly  im- 
plies that  the  language,  customs,  passions,  in  one 
word,  the  character,  of  the  moorland  hinds  and  squires, 
that  figure  in  Wuthering  Heights,  are  looked  upon  by 
the  writer  as  correctly  depicted.  But  after  stating,  in 
the  immediate  sequel,  that  the  scenery  of  Wuthering 
Heights  is  true  to  the  West  Eiding — that  the  book  is 
"  moorish,  and  wild,  and  knotty  as  a  root  of  heath," — 
that  the  hills  and  moors  were,  to  her  sister, "  what  she 
lived  in  and  by,  as  much  as  the  wild  birds,  their  ten- 
ants, or  as  the  heather,  their  produce," — she  adds  that 
Emily,  after  all,  knew  nothing,  except  at  second-hand, 
about  the  moorland  hinds  and  squires.  "  I  am  bound 
to  avow" — these  are  Charlotte's  words — "  that  she  had 
scarcely  more  practical  knowledge  of  the  peasantry 


Emily's  Knowledge  of  Yorkshire.  201 

______ * 

amongst  whom  she  lived,  than  a  nun  has  of  the  country 
people  who  sometimes  pass  her  convent  gates."  Emily, 
it  seems,  was  benevolent  but  not  "gregarious,"  by 
which  word  Charlotte  means  sociable.  She  had  heard 
the  histories  of  the  moorland  folk,  but  did  not  know 
them  personally.  "  She  could  hear  of  them  with 
interest,  and  talk  of  them  with  detail,  minute,  graphic, 
and  accurate ;  but  with  them,  she  rarely  exchanged  a 
word.  Hence  it  ensued  that  what  her  mind  had 
gathered  of  the  real  concerning  them  was  too  exclu- 
sively confined  to  those  tragic  and  terrible  traits  of 
which,  in  listening  to  the  secret  annals  of  every  rude 
vicinage,  the  memory  is  sometimes  compelled  to  re- 
ceive the  impress.  Her  imagination,  which  was  a 
spirit  more  sombre  than  sunny,  more  powerful  than 
sportive,  found  in  such  traits  material  whence  it 
wrought  creations  like  Heathcliff,  like  Earnshaw,  like 
Catherine." 

I  am  unable  to  believe  that  Emily  Bronte  had 
derived  only  from  hearsay  the  knowledge  of  human 
character,  and  in  particular  of  the  language  and 
manners  of  the  West  Eiding,  which  is  exhibited  in 
Wuthering  Heights.  She  shows  herself  almost  as 
familiar  with  the  dialect  of  the  West  Eiding  as  Scott 
does  with  the  broad  Scotch  of  Midlothian  farm- 
houses. Secluded  as  had  been  her  life,  I  cannot 
doubt  that  she  had  seen  and  talked  with  peasants 
who  might  have  sat  for  Joseph,  with  woman- 
servants  who  might  have  been  the  original  of  Zillah, 
and  with  youthful  hinds  who  might  have  suggested 


v, 


202  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

Hareton  Earnshaw.  Nor  is  it  credible  that  the  dis- 
like of  strangers,  the  vehemence  of  language  even  to 
cursing,  the  general  shaggy  rudeness  and  roughness 
and  ungeniality,  that  characterised  the  household  of 
Wuthering  Heights,  were  not  suggested  by  personal 
observation  among  the  moors  of  Yorkshire.  The 
truth  seems  to  be  that  Charlotte  gave  one  aspect  of 
the  Yorkshire  character,  and  Emily  another.  Char- 
lotte showed  the  brilliant,  bright,  and  brave  side  of 
Yorkshire  human  nature  in  her  Shirley  Keeldars  and 
her  Bobert  Moores ;  Emily,  in  her  Josephs  and  her 
Heathcliffs,  brought  out  its  capacities  for  badness,  its 
dark  Norse  tendency  to  brooding  spite  and  to  implaca- 
bility of  vengeful  hate,  its  proneness  to  case  its  natural 
hardness  in  spiritual  pride  and  to  deepen  its  natural 
gloom  by  superstition.  Since  the  domestic  annals  of 
England,  whether  in  Yorkshire  or  elsewhere,  have 
been  made  public  in  the  reports  of  the  divorce  and 
police  courts,  it  has  been  no  secret  that  such  things 
happen  as  are  detailed  in  the  history  of  the  neighbour 
families  of  Earnshaw  and  Linton.  I,  of  course,  do 
not  presume  to  set  aside  Charlotte  Bronte's  statement 
as  to  the  slightness  of  Emily's  intercourse  with  the 
people  of  Yorkshire  ;  but  I  think  that  she  did  not 
sufficiently  take  account  of  the  opportunities  for  obser- 
vation inevitably  occurring  to  one  brought  up  from 
infancy  in  a  particular  locality,  and  of  the  value,  even 
of  rare  occasions  of  observation,  to  so  sure  an  eye, 
and  so  tenacious  a  memory,  as  Emily's. 

The    stamp   of    Emily's   genius,   branded   deep    on 


The  Meaning  of   Wutliering  Heights.          203 

Wuthering  Heights,  is  seen  chiefly  in  what  I  shall 
call  the  motivation  of  the  work.  The  secret  of  her 
life,  if  we  may  read  that  secret  in  the  terrible  poem 
which  I  attempted  to  analyse,  is  to  be  discerned 
between  the  lines  of  the  novel.  The  purport  of  the 
poem  is  that  Emily  Bronte  had  searched  the  universe 
for  God,  and  that  God  had  never,  by  so  much  as  one 
glimpse  of  His  eye,  revealed  Himself  to  her.  The 
burden  of  Wuthering  Heights  is  the  potency  of  evil — 
its  potency  to  pervert  good.  Old  Mr.  Earnshaw  does 
a  deed  of  kindness — relieves  the  helpless,  shelters  the 
homeless — and  thus  brings  a  fiend  in  human  shape 
into  his  house.  Emily  Bronte,  with  a  strange  reserve 
of  power  in  so  young  an  artist,  generally  covers  up  her 
secret ;  but  she  is  vividly  conscious  of  her  own  mean- 
ing, and  sometimes  lets  us  have  more  than  a  hint  of 
it.  "  It's  a  cuckoo's,  sir,"  answers  Nelly  Dean,  when 
Lockwood  asks  her  what  is  HeathclifFs  history.  Now 
the  ways  of  the  cuckoo  are  deeply  suggestive.  The 
green-finch  builds  her  nest  in  the  hedge,  and  lays  her 
eggs ;  the  cuckoo  comes  and  inserts  her  egg  among  the 
rest ;  and  if  you  go  and  look  six  weeks  afterwards, 
you  find  that  the  young  cuckoo  has  utterly  dispos- 
sessed the  young  finches,  by  way  of  thanks  to  their 
mother  for  giving  it  a  warm  place,  while  still  un- 
fledged, among  her  eggs.  I  have  seen  the  young 
cuckoo — a  huge,  hawk-like  thing,  much  larger  than 
the  whole  nest  of  the  green-finch,  out  of  which  and 
over  which  it  had  grown  until  it  no  longer  lay  in  it 
but  upon  it — and  could  well  believe,  from  its  greedy, 


204  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

voracious  look,  that  it  was  capable,  according  to  the 
old  couplet  quoted  in  King  Lear,  of  biting  off  the  head 
of  its  good  little  foster-mother.  This  is  one  of  those 
mysterious  facts  which  are  not  usually  mentioned  by 
preachers  when  expatiating  on  the  bounty  and  benefi- 
cence of  nature,  but  which,  at  a  time  when  nature- 
worship  is  fashionable,  ought  not  to  be  overlooked. 
Heathcliff,  the  little  castaway  Lascar,  or  gipsy,  whom 
Mr.  Earnshaw  picked  out  of  the  gutter  in  Liverpool 
and  brought  home,  was  the  human  cuckoo  of  Wuther- 
ing  Heights.  In  like  manner,  the  hospitable  deed  of 
Mr.  and  Mrs.  Linton,  of  Thrushcross  Grange,  in 
sheltering  Catherine  Earnshaw,  leading,  as  it  did, 
to  an  intimacy  between  the  families  of  the  Heights 
and  of  the  Grange,  brought  sorrow  and  death  to 
their  offspring. 

Strange  and  appalling  thesis  to  be  expounded  by  an 
English  girl !  In  the  Iliad  it  is  of  tyrannic  rapacity 
on  the  one  hand,  and  proud  resentment  and  moody 
wrath  on  the  other,  that  the  curse  is  born  whence 
spring  unnumbered  woes.  In  the  great  Greek 
tragedies  it  is  sin  always  that  is  the  fountain-head 
of  sorrow.  The  Supreme  is  audaciously  defied  or 
outwitted  before  Prometheus  is  nailed  on  his  rock- 
Agamemnon  slays  Iphigeneia  ;  Clytaemnestra  kills  the 
husband  who  had  slain  her  daughter  and  his  own ; 
Orestes  kills  the  mother  who  had  killed  his  father. 
Even  when  the  sin  is  committed  in  entire  uncon- 
sciousness, as  when  CEdipus  kills  Laius,  the  deed 
itself,  viewed  objectively,  is  evil.  In  the  tremendous 


Withering  Heights.  205 

tragedy  of  Lear,  in  which  the  genius  of  Shakespeare 
reveals  itself  in  all  its  characteristic  moral  intensity, 
it  is  from  folly  and  lawless  passion — the  folly  of 
prodigal  and  impulsive  generosity  in  the  old  King 
and  the  sin  of  lawless  passion  in  Gloucester — that  the 
subsequent  blighting  of  the  earth  and  blackening  of 
the  heavens  proceed.  But  in  Wuthering  Heights  the 
root  of  pain  and  misery  is  goodness,  and  the  world  in 
which  we  move  seems  God-forsaken.  And  yet— this 
can,  I  think,  be  proved — the  tale  is  told  without 
violation  of  natural  possibility.  That  is  to  say,  we 
are  always  made  aware  of  the  means  by  which  good 
is  neutralised  or  perverted  and  the  triumph  of  evil 
prepared.  Herein  is  displayed  the  consummate  skill 
of  the  author ;  while  at  the  same  time  the  main 
doctrine  of  the  book,  that  there  is  no  overruling 
Divine  force  to  be  counted  on  to  "  make  for  "  right- 
eousness, or  for  those  who  work  righteousness,  is 
fearfully  illustrated. 

It  is  not  indeed  wholly  without  glimpses  of  joy  and 
brightness.  Were  that  so,  the  gloom  would  be  in- 
sufferable. "A  good  heart  will  help  you  to  a  bonny 
face,  my  lad,"  says  one  of  the  characters.  There  is 
much  tenderness,  as  well  as  sense  of  the  wild  joy  of 
the  moors,  in  the  loving  inspection  and  enumeration  of 
the  feathers  of  moorland  birds  drawn  from  her  pillow 
by  Cathy  Linton  on  her  death-bed.  .  Sometimes  the 
darkness  is  dispersed,  like  mist  by  a  sudden  burst  of 
sunlight,  and  the  joy  breaks  out  in  a  loud,  ringing, 
lark-like  song  of  gladness,  as  in  that  admirable  passage 


206  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

where  the  younger  Cathy  gives  an  account  of  the 
dispute  which  she  and  her  boy-lover  had  as  to  the  best 
way  of  imagining  happiness  and  heaven.  "  One 
time,"  she  says,  "  we  were  near  quarrelling.  He  said, 
the  pleasantest  manner  of  spending  a  hot  July  day  was 
lying  from  morning  till  evening  on  the  bank  of  heath 
in  the  middle  of  the  moors,  with  the  bees  humming 
dreamily  about  among  the  bloom,  and  the  larks 
singing  high  up  overhead,  and  the  blue  sky  and  bright 
sun  shining  steadily  and  cloudlessly.  That  was  his 
perfect  idea  of  heaven's  happiness.  Mine  was,  rocking 
in  a  rustling  green  tree,  with  a  west  wind  blowing, 
and  bright  white  clouds  flitting  rapidly  above ;  and  not 
only  larks,  but  throstles,  and  blackbirds,  and  linnets, 
and  cuckoos,  pouring  out  music  on  every  side,  and  the 
moors  seen  at  a  distance,  broken  into  cool,  dusky  dells  ; 
but  close  by,  great  swells  of  long  grass  undulating  in 
waves  to  the  breeze  ;  and  woods,  and  sounding  water, 
and  the  whole  world  awake  and  wild  with  joy.  He 
wanted  all  to  lie  in  an  ecstasy  of  peace ;  I  wanted  all 
to  sparkle  and  dance  in  a  glorious  jubilee."  It  is  not, 
however,  too  much  to  say  that  there  is  only  enough  of 
brightness  in  Wuthering  Heights  to  bring  out  the 
gloom  of  the  book  in  its  deepest  murky  glow. 


CHAPTEE  V. 

WUTHERING  HEIGHTS  —  HEATHGLIFF  AND 
CATHY  —  OLD  JOSEPH  —  ISABELLA  —  LINTON 
HEATHCLIFF. 

AT  the  beginning  of  the  tale  we  have  a  description 
of  its  principal  locality  :  "  Wuthering  Heights  is 
the  name  of  Mr.  HeathclifFs  dwelling, '  wuthering1  being 
a  significant  provincial  adjective,  descriptive  of  the 
atmospheric  tumult  to  which  its  station  is  exposed  in 
stormy  weather.  Pure,  bracing  ventilation  they  must 
have  up  there  at  all  times  ;  indeed,  one  may  guess  the 
power  of  the  north  wind  blowing  over  the  edge,  by  the 
excessive  slant  of  a  few  stunted  firs  at  the  end  of  the 
house ;  and  by  a  range  of  gaunt  thorns  all  stretching 
their  limbs  one  way,  as  if  craving  alms  of  the  sun." 
The  book  throughout  is  written  in  this  style  ;  simple, 
terse,  idiomatic,  perfectly  clear,  singularly  picturesque  ; 
without  the  French  polish  that  is  conspicuous  in 
Charlotte's,  but  with  more  of  homety  pith  and  forceful 
ease.  That  of  the  gaunt  thorns  asking  alms  of  the 
sun  is  a  wonderful  piece  of  imaginative  work,  to  come 
so  easily  from  the  hand  of  a  girl-artist. 

Mr.  Earnshaw,  Squire  of  Wuthering  Heights,  had 
been  absent  for  three  days,  and  arrived  about  eleven 


208  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

o'clock  at  night.  The  children,  bent  on  seeing  their 
presents,  had  prevailed  with  their  mother  to  let  them 
sit  up  for  him.  He  flung  himself  into  a  chair,  saying 
he  was  nearly  dead.  Opening  his  great  coat,  "  See 
here,  wife!"  he  said,  "I  was  never  so  beaten  with 
anything  in  my  life  ;  but  you  must  e'en  take  it  as  a 
gift  of  God ;  though  it's  as  dark  almost  as  if  it  came 
from  the  devil."  What  they  saw  was  "a  dirty,  ragged, 
black-haired  child,"  talking  gibberish.  Mr.  Earnshaw 
had  seen  it  "starving"  in  the  streets  of  Liverpool. 
So  it  was  taken  into  the  family  and  called  Heathcliff. 
It  seemed  to  be  "  a  sullen,  patient  child ;  hardened, 
perhaps,  to  ill-treatment."  Mr.  Earnshaw  defended 
the  boy  against  his  son  Hindley,  who  disliked  him, 
and  ill-feeling  thus  crept  in  between  son  and  father. 
Heathcliff  was  quiet  and  uncomplaining,  but  insen- 
sible to  kindness,  and  profoundly  selfish.  In  addition 
to  his  son,  Mr.  Earnshaw  had  a  daughter  Catherine. 
Wild  as  a  moorland  bird,  she  had  a  strange  witching 
beauty  of  her  own,  and  none  but  she  had  power  over 
the  affections  of  Heathcliff.  They  grew  up  side  by 
side,  rambled  together  on  the  moors,  and  learned  to 
love  each  other  with  what  was  less  an  ordinary 
passion  than  an  absolute  absorption  of  the  life  and 
being  of  the  one  into  those  of  the  other.  I  shall  quote 
the  account  of  one  of  their  truant  excursions  which 
had  important  effects.  They  had  been  banished  from 
the  sitting-room  as  the  evening  came  on,  had  escaped 
to  the  moors,  and  took  it  into  their  heads  to  ramble 
to  Thrushcross  Grange,  several  miles  away,  to  see 


Boy  and  Girl.  209 


what    the   Linton    children    were    doing.       The   boy 
Heathcliff  is  the  speaker,  Nelly  Dean  the  listener. 

"  We  ran  from  the  top  of  the  Heights  to  the  park  without  stopping 
— Catherine  completely  beaten  in  the  race,  because  'she  was  bare- 
foot. You'll  have  to  seek  for  her  shoes  in  the  bog  to-morrow.  We 
crept  through  a  broken  hedge,  groped  our  way  up  the  path,  and 
planted  ourselves  on  a  flower-plot  under  the  drawing-room 
window.  The  light  came  from  thence ;  they  had  not  put 
up  the  shutters,  and  the  curtains  were  only  half  closed.  Both 
of  us  were  able  to  look  in  by  standing  on  the  basement,  and 
clinging  to  the  ledge,  and  we  saw — ah !  it  was  beautiful — a  splendid 
place,  carpeted  with  crimson,  and  crimson- covered  chairs  and 
tables,  and  a  pure  white  ceiling  bordered  by  gold,  a  shower  of 
glass-drops  hanging  in  silver  chains  from  the  centre,  and  shim- 
mering with  little  soft  tapers.  Old  Mr.  and  Mrs.  Linton  were  not 
there ;  Edgar  and  his  sister  had  it  entirely  to  themselves. 
Shouldn't  they  have  been  happy?  We  should  have  thought 
ourselves  in  heaven !  And  now,  guess  what  your  good  children 
were  doing?  Isabella — I  believe  she  is  eleven — a  year  younger 
than  Cathy — lay  screaming  at  the  further  end  of  the  room, 
shrieking  as  if  witches  were  running  red-hot  needles  into  her. 
Edgar  stood  on  the  hearth,  weeping  silently,  and  in  the  middle  of 
the  table  sat  a  little  dog,  shaking  its  paw  and  yelping ;  which,  from 
then*  mutual  accusations,  we  understood  they  had  nearly  pulled  in 
two  between  them.  The  idiots !  That  was  their  pleasure  !  to 
quarrel  who  should  hold  a  heap  of  warm  hair,  and  each  begin  to 
cry  because  both,  after  struggling  to  get  it,  refused  to  take  it.  We 
laughed  outright  at  the  petted  things ;  we  did  despise  them ! 
When  would  you  catch  me  wishing  to  have  what  Catherine 
wanted  ?  or  find  us  by  ourselves,  seeking  entertainment  in  yelling, 
and  sobbing,  and  rolling  on  the  ground,  divided  by  the  whole 
room  ?  I'd  not  exchange,  for  a  thousand  lives,  my  condition  here 
for  Edgar  Linton's  at  Thrushcross  Grange — not  if  I  might  have  the 
privilege  of  flinging  Joseph  off  the  highest  gable,  and  painting  the 
house-front  with  Hindley's  blood !  " 

"  Hush,'  hush  !  "  I  interrupted.  "  Still  you  have  not  told  me, 
Heathcliff,  how  Catherine  is  left  behind?"  "I  told  you  we 
laughed,"  he  answered.  "The  Lintons  heard  us,  and  with  one 
•accord  they  shot  like  arrows  to  the  door ;  there  was  silence,  and 

14 


210  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

then  a  cry,  '  Oh,  mamma,  mamma !  Oh,  papa !  Oh,  mamma, 
come  here.  Oh,  papa,  oh !  "  They  really  did  howl  out  something 
in  that  way.  We  made  frightful  noises  to  terrify  them  still  more, 
and  then  we  dropped  off  the  ledge,  because  somebody  was  drawing 
the  bars,  and  we  felt  we  had  better  flee.  I  had  Cathy  by  the  hand, 
and  was  urging  her  on,  when  all  at  once  she  fell  down.  '  Kun, 
Heathcliff,  run !  '  she  whispered.  '  They  have  let  the  bull-dog 
loose,  and  he  holds  me ! '  The  devil  had  seized  her  ankle,  Nelly  : 
I  heard  his  abominable  snorting.  She  did  not  yell  out — no,  she 
would  have  scorned  to  do  it,  if  she  had  been  spitted  on  the  horns 
of  a  mad  cow.  I  did,  though,  I  vociferated  curses  enough  to 
annihilate  any  fiend  in  Christendom  ;  and  I  got  a  stone  and  thrust 
it  between  its  jaws,  and  tried  with  all  my  might  to  cram  it  down 
his  throat.  A  beast  of  a  servant  came  up  with  a  lantern,  at  last, 
shouting,  *  Keep  fast,  Skulker,  keep  fast.'  He  changed  his  tone, 
however,  when  he  saw  Skulker's  game.  The  dog  was  throttled  off; 
his  huge,  purple  tongue  hanging  half  a  foot  out  of  his  mouth,  and 
the  pendent  lips  streaming  with  bloody  slaver.  The  man  took 
Cathy  up ;  she  was  sick ;  not  from  fear,  I  am  certain,  but  from 
pain.  He  carried  her  in  ;  I  followed,  grumbling  execrations  and 
vengeance.  'What  prey,  Robert?'  hallooed  Linton,  from  the 
entrance.  'Skulker  has  caught  a  little  girl,  sir,'  he  replied  ;  'and 
there's  a  lad  here,'  he  added,  making  a  clutch  at  me,  '  who  looks 
an  out-and-outer !  Very  like  the  robbers  were  for  putting  them 
through  the  window  to  open  the  doors  to  the  gang  after  all  were 
asleep,  that  they  might  murder  us  at  their  ease.  Hold  your 
tongue,  you  foul-mouthed  thief,  you  !  You  shall  go  to  the  gallows 
for  this.  Mr.  Linton,  sir,  don't  lay  by  your  gun.'  '  No,  no,  Robert,' 
said  the  old  fool.  '  The  rascals  knew  that  yesterday  was  my  rent- 
day.'  He  pulled  me  under  the  chandelier,  and  Mrs.  Linton  placed 
her  spectacles  on  her  nose,  and  raised  her  hands  in  horror.  The 
cowardly  children  crept  nearer,  also,  Isabel  lisping — 'Frightful 
thing !  Put  him  in  the  cellar,  papa.' " 

The  implacable  hatred  with  which  Heathcliff  hence- 
forward regarded  Isabella  Linton  and  her  brother 
Edgar  may  be  partly  accounted  for  by  the  impressions 
received  by  him  on  this  occasion.  Such  a  proposal  as 
"  Put  him  in  the  cellar,  papa,"  made  by  a  little  girl, 


Cathy  and  the  Lintons.  211 

would  strike  the  boy-prisoner  as  venomously  cruel.  It 
is  important  to  note  this  point,  for  in  no  respect  is 
Heathcliff's  subsequent  conduct  quite  so  diabolical  as 
in  his  treatment  of  Isabella  and  her  child.  No  com- 
mittal to  the  cellar,  however,  took  place.  Cathy  was 
presently  recognised  and  received  into  favour,  while 
Heathcliff  was  ordered  out  of  the  house,  to  pick  his 
way  back  to  Wuthering  Heights  over  the  moors,  "  I 
refused,"  he  says,  "to  go  without  Cathy;  he  (the  man- 
servant) dragged  me  into  the  garden,  pushed  the  lantern 
into  my  hand,  assured  me  that  Mr.  Earnshaw  should 
be  informed  of  my  behaviour,  and,  bidding  me  march 
directly,  secured  the  door  again.  The  curtains  were 
still  looped  up  at  one  corner,  and  I  resumed  my 
station  as  spy  ;  because,  if  Catherine  had  wished  to 
return,  I  intended  shattering  their  great  glass  panes 
to  a  million  of  fragments,  unless  they  let  her  out. 
She  sat  on  the  sofa  quietly.  The  woman-servant 
brought  a  basin  of  warm  water,  and  washed  her  feet ; 
and  Mr.  Linton  mixed  a  tumbler  of  negus,  and 
Isabella  emptied  a  plateful  of  cakes  into  her  lap,  and 
Edgar  stood  gaping  at  a  distance.  Afterwards  they 
dried  and  combed  her  beautiful  hair,  and  gave  her  a 
pair  of  enormous  slippers  and  wheeled  her  to  the  fire ; 
and  I  left  her  as  merry  as  she  could  be,  dividing  her 
food  between  the  little  dog  and  Skulker,  whose  nose 
she  pinched  as  he  ate  ;  and  kindling  a  spark  of  spirit 
in  the  vacant  blue  eyes  of  the  Lintons — a  dim  reflec- 
tion from  her  own  enchanting  face.  I  saw  they  were 
full  of  stupid  admiration;  she  is  so  immeasurably 

14—2 


212  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

superior  to  them — to  everybody  on  earth — is  she  not, 
Nelly?" 

At  this  time  there  was  evidently  much  capability  of 
good  in  Heathcliff.  He  was  a  brave  boy,  and  intensely 
devoted  to  at  least  one  human  being  in  addition  to 
himself.  But  Hindley  had  lately  succeeded  to  his 
father  in  possession  of  Wuthering  Heights,  and  had 
begun  to  treat  Heathcliff  with  detestable  injustice. 
His  cruelty  "  was  enough  to  make  a  fiend  of  a  saint." 
Heathcliff  had  been  no  saint,  but  the  fiendish  elements 
in  his  nature  grew  apace  under  Hindley's  nurturing. 
Catherine,  too,  had  apparently  ceased  to  love  the 
alien,  and  resolved  to  bestow  herself  on  Edgar  Linton. 
Heathcliff,  in  desperation,  ran  away  from  Wuthering 
Heights,  and  was  not  heard  of  for  several  years.  One 
day  he  returned,  full-grown,  and  with  money  in  his 
pockets ;  but  where  he  had  been,  or  how  he  had  got 
it,  he  never  told. 

I  shall  now  make  him  stand  aside  until  I  have  said 
a  word  or  two  on  old  Joseph,  a  minor  character,  but 
one  of  the  most  original  in  the  group,  and  on  some 
others  among  the  dramatis  personce. 

"  There  is  a  dry  saturnine  humour,"  says  Charlotte 
Bronte,  "in  the  delineation  of  old  Joseph."  The 
humour  is  both  saturnine  and  dry,  as  compared,  for 
example,  with  that  of  Scott  in  the  far  more  genial 
and  amusing  portraiture  of  the  kindred  character, 
Andrew  Fairservice  ;  but  it  is  of  a  rarer  quality 
than  Charlotte  seems  to  perceive.  There  are  touches 
in  the  delineation  of  Joseph  which  recall  George  Eliot 


Old  Joseph.  213 


in  her  raciest  mood.  He  can  throw  a  reflection  or  a 
sneer  into  a  metaphoric  form  so  apt,  compact,  and 
graphic,  that  we  are  reminded  of  Mrs.  Poyser  and, 
still  more,  of  Elspeth  Bede.  His  way  of  describing  one 
man  yielding  to  temptation  administered  by  another  is 
to  say  that  the  first  "  gallops  down  t'  broad  road," 
while  the  second  "  flees  afore  to  oppen  t'  pikes."  He 
characterises  a  dainty,  proud  woman  in  the  following 
remark  :  "  We  wer  a'most  too  mucky  to  sow  t'  corn 
for  makking  her  breead."  Have  we  anything  better 
than  that  from  Mrs.  Poyser  or  Elspeth  Bede  ?  Joseph 
is  not  consciously  a  bad  man.  Nay,  he  is  convinced 
of  his  superlative  goodness,  and  belongs  to  that  class, 
with  whom  we  found  Anne  Bronte  expostulating,  who 
have  no  manner  of  difficulty,  no  weak  human  experi- 
ence of  imaginative  or  sympathetic  pain,  in  supposing 
that  an  enormous  proportion  of  their  race  have  been 
marked  off  for  everlasting  destruction,  while  they  are 
themselves  the  favourites  of  heaven.  He  was  "the 
wearisomest,  self-righteous  Pharisee  that  ever  ran- 
sacked a  Bible  to  rake  the  promises  to  himself  and 
fling  the  curses  to  his  neighbours."  In  the  height 
of  a  thunderstorm  he  "  swung  on  to  his  knees, 
beseeching  the  Lord  to  remember  the  patriarchs 
Noah  and  Lot,  and,  as  in  former  times,  spare  the 
righteous,  though  He  smote  the  ungodly."  "  Thank 
Hivin  for  all !  "  said  Joseph.  "  All  warks  togither  for 
gooid  to  them  as  is  chozzen,  and  piked  out  fro'  th' 
rubbidge  ! "  Joseph  was  not  without  a  certain  dog- 
like  fidelity  to  the  Earnshaw  family,  but  it  never 


214  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

interfered  with  the  rooted  selfishness  of  his  nature. 
If  we  take  the  bank-notes  in  the  following  sentence  to 
symbolise  the  intense  worldliness  overlying  all  that 
was  good  in  his  sentiments  and  theology,  the  words 
will  expressively  denote  the  kind  of  man  he  was. 
"He  solemnly  spread  his  large  Bible  on  the  table, 
and  overlaid  it  with  dirty  bank-notes  from  his  pocket- 
book." 

Such  characters  as  Joseph  are,  I  think,  uncommon. 
I  have  met  with  but  one  or  two  in  the  course  of  my 
life,  and  of  none  even  of  these  am  I  perfectly  sure  that 
Joseph  can  be  taken  as  the  accurate  representative. 
I  do  not  doubt,  however,  that  Emily  Bronte  had  some 
actual  Yorkshire  peasant  in  view,  and  without  ques- 
tion the  peculiar  faults  and  perversities  of  Joseph  are 
in  minor  degree  and  development  not  too  rare  to  be 
worth  pointing  out  and  guarding  against.  If  you 
stand  on  the  seashore  when  the  sky  is  cloudless,  and 
look  towards  the  sun,  you  will  see  the  sunbeams 
falling  solely  on  the  line  between  your  eye  and  the 
luminary,  forming  a  pathway  of  light  along  the  waves. 
If  the  shore  were  lined  by  a  million  men,  only  one 
line,  kindled  by  the  beams,  would  be  visible  to  each  of 
the  million.  Now  Joseph  corresponds,  in  the  spiritual 
province,  to  one  of  those  men  who  should  allege  that 
there  was  no  sunlight  in  the  air  except  what  reached 
his  own  eye.  The  infinite  benevolence  is  drawn  into 
the  focus  of  his  small  sect,  his  still  smaller  self,  and 
by  a  strange  perversion  the  affections  shrink  and 
shrivel  even  under  that  sense  of  Divine  kindness 


The  Minor  Characters.  215 

which   ought   to  have   warmed,   expanded,   ennobled 
them. 

In  boldness  of  invention  and  strength  of  handling, 
Joseph  is  like  a  grotesque  by  Michael  Angelo  ;  gnarled 
and  knotted  as  a  stunted  tree  of  the  moorland ;  his 
vinegar  face  perked  into  contemptuous  rebuke  of  his 
fellow-creatures,  his  brow  corrugated  in  an  unhappy 
grudge  that  there  is  so  much  happiness  left  in  the 
world.  He  is,  indeed,  little  more  than  a  sketch ;  but 
the  sketch,  if  we  had  nothing  else  from  her  hand, 
would  attest  the  genius  of  Emily  Bronte. 

Nelly  Dean,  Edgar  Linton,  and  Lockwood,  to 
whom  might  perhaps  be  added  Zillah,  though  she  is 
nothing  more  than  an  ordinary  farm  servant  with 
some  Yorkshire  colour  about  her,  are  the  neutral- 
tinted  characters  in  the  book,  neither  specially  good 
nor  pointedly  bad.  Emily  Bronte  evidently  took  too 
dark  views  of  life,  and  was  too  ironical  in  her  moods 
of  mind,  to  rejoice  in  the  delineation  of  heroes  and 
heroines.  Wuthering  Heights  is  a  novel  without  a 
hero,  and  with  but  a  very  marred  and  faulty  specimen 
of  a  heroine.  Charlotte  speaks  of  the  "  true  benevo- 
lence and  homely  fidelity  "  of  Nelly  Dean  ;  but  in  fact 
Nelly  has  generally  an  eye  to  the  main  chance,  and 
only  once  forgets  herself  into  a  display  of  dangerous 
anger  and  courage,  on  which  occasion  "  a  touch  on 
the  chest  "  from  Heathcliff  silences  her,  she  being,  as 
she  explains,  "  stout,  and  soon  put  out  of  breath." 
Lockwood  is  little  more  than  a  walking  gentleman, 
but,  viewed  as  a  walking  gentleman,  he  is  made 


216  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

admirable  use  of.  Not  only  are  his  successive  visits 
to  the  gaunt  manor-house  on  the  Heights  full  of  vivid 
and  appropriate  interest,  and  cunningly  adapted  to 
awaken  the  curiosity  of  the  reader,  but  his  reception 
by  the  various  inmates  enables  us  to  realise,  as  we 
otherwise  could  not  have  done,  the  peculiar  feeling  of 
repulsion  and  dislike  with  which  the  natives  of  the 
Yorkshire  wilds  regard  strangers.  The  moorland 
creatures  have  their  own  quarrels  and  spites ;  but 
with  creatures  of  another  kind  they  admit  no  con- 
verse at  all.  Not  only  do  Joseph  and  Heathcliff — 
who  look  upon  the  smooth-spoken,  conventional, 
studiously-polite  Lockwood  as  shaggy  mastiffs  might 
on  an  Italian  greyhound — despise  and  repel  him ; 
young  Cathy  will  have  nothing  at  all  to  say  to  him. 
He  is  outside  her  circle — outside  her  sympathy;  she 
answers  snappishly  when  he  volunteers  the  slightest 
act  of  interrogative  courtesy.  It  is  the  instinctive 
shyness,  suspicion,  aversion  of  a  kitten  spitting  at  a 
puppy  that  wants  to  be  civil. 

Edgar  Linton  is  the  morally  best  character  in  the 
book.  Charlotte  well  describes  him  as  "an  example 
of  constancy  and  tenderness."  He  is  good,  but  sheep- 
ishly, ineffectually  good.  We  cannot  help  feeling  that 
Emily  Bronte  shares  the  contempt  for  him  which  is 
so  intensely  felt  by  If  eathcliff,  and  so  thinly  disguised 
by  his  own  wife  Catherine.  He  has  none  of  the 
mental  power  that  is  the  fitting  accompaniment,  and 
indispensable  stay,  of  goodness  of  heart.  He  not 
only  fails  to  defend  himself  against  Heathcliff,  but 


Isabella  and  Her  Son.  217 

commits  the  quite  unpardonable  oversight  of  making 
no  provision  for  his  daughter,  and  thus  leaving  her 
an  easy  prey  to  the  enemy  of  his  house. 

Isabella  Heathcliff  and  her  son  Linton  are  exceed- 
ingly remarkable  studies  of  character.  Isabella  is 
feeble  and  morbid,  with  sickly  propensities  and  a 
cold  heart.  Heathcliff  hates  her  inflexibly  from  the 
day  when  she  asks  her  father  to  put  him  into  the 
cellar ;  and  yet,  when  he  has  grown  up  and  revealed 
his  badness,  she  will  hanker  after  him,  fall  into  foolish 
love  with  him,  perversely,  and  in  spite  of  all  dissua- 
sion, and  though  he  hardly  condescends  to  pretend  to 
care  for  her,  throw  herself  into  his  arms.  She  becomes 
more  rational  and  human  when  his  cruelty  drives  her 
into  irrepressible  rage,  and  she  escapes  from  him,  to 
return  no  more.  But  we  never  have  much  regard  for 
her ;  only  we  have  a  profound  sense  of  her  reality,  and 
of  the  fidelity  with  which  she  represents  a  morbid 
phase  of  feminine  character. 

Her  son  and  Heathcliff 's  is,  as  Dobell  remarked, 
unmistakably  the  offspring  of  those  parents.  Half  is 
his  and  half  is  hers,  and  he  is  worthy  of  the  two.  The 
creature  is  bad — very  bad  ;  physically  weak,  mentally 
cross-grained,  peevish,  ill-conditioned.  Terrible,  once 
more,  is  the  suggestion  of  the  subtlety  and  cruelty, 
and  blind  and  blank  indifference  to  the  production  of 
misery,  reigning  in  nature,  which  this  dark,  strange 
woman,  this  Emily  Bronte,  half  hides,  half  reveals,  in 
the  character  and  history  of  Linton  Heathcliff.  I 
am  not  sure  that  young  Heathcliff  is  not  the  most 


218  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

wonderful  delineation  in  the  book — more  wonderful 
even  than  his  father  or  than  either  of  the  Catherines. 
A  thin,  wavering,  gossamer-thread  of  existence  is  the 
boy's  at  best,  and  it  is  soon  blown  away  in  the  chill 
wind  of  death ;  yet  we  know  him  as  vividly  as  we 
know  any  character  in  fiction.  We  know  him  not 
from  the  outside,  but  the  inside, — not  merely  the 
marking  of  the  hands  on  the  clock-face,  but  the  wheels 
and  sources  of  movement  behind.  This  mode  of 
revealing  character,  not  so  much  by  external  incident 
as  by  psychological  analysis — by  taking  us,  as  Shak- 
speare  does  in  the  case  of  Macbeth,  and  Hamlet,  and 
Brutus,  and  Angelo,  and  Claudio,  into  the  mind — is 
the  most  difficult  and  masterly  of  all.  The  whining 
self-pity,  the  incapacity  to  regard  any  one  except  in 
the  light  of  his  own  interest,  the  pleased  excitement 
of  which  he  is  conscious  when  his  words  give  pain, 
manifested  by  young  Heathcliff  in  conversation  with 
his  cousin,  Cathy  Linton,  open  to  us  the  very  arcana 
of  his  nature.  I  must  quote  a  short  passage  to  illus- 
trate these  remarks.  Nelly  Dean  details  a  conversa- 
tion between  Linton  Heathcliff  and  young  Cathy. 
The  reader  is  to  recollect  that  young  Cathy's  mother 
had  really  loved  Heathcliff,  Linton  Heathcliff 's  father, 
though  she  gave  her  hand  to  Edgar  Linton. 

"Yes,"  said  Catherine,  stroking  his  long,  soft  hair;  "if  I  could 
only  get  papa's  consent,  I'd  spend  half  my  tune  with  you.  Pretty 
Linton !  I  wish  you  were  my  brother."  "  And  then  you  would 
like  me  as  well  as  your  father  ?  "  observed  he,  more  cheerfully. 
"But  papa  says  you  would  love  me  better  than  him  and  all  the 
world  if  you  were  my  wife  ;  so  I'd  rather  you  were  that."  "  No  ; 


Linton  HeatJicliff.  219 

I  should  never  love  anybody  better  than  papa,"  she  returned, 
gravely.  "  And  people  hate  their  wives  sometimes,  but  not  then- 
sisters  and  brothers ;  and  if  you  were  the  latter,  you  would  live 
with  us,  and  papa  would  be  as  fond  of  you  as  he  is  of  me."  Linton 
denied  that  people  ever  hated  their  wives  ;  but  Cathy  affirmed  they 
did,  and  in  her  wisdom  instanced  his  own  father's  aversion  to  her 
aunt.  I  endeavoured  to  stop  her  thoughtless  tongue.  I  couldn't 
succeed  till  everything  she  knew  was  out.  Master  Heathcliff, 
much  irritated,  asserted  her  relation  was  false.  "  Papa  told  me, 
and  papa  does  not  tell  falsehoods,"  she  answered,  pertly.  "My 
papa  scorns  yours!"  cried  Linton.  "He  calls  him  a  sneaking 
fool."  "Yours  is  a  wicked  man,"  retorted  Catherine  ;  "and  you 
are  very  naughty  to  dare  to  repeat  what  he  says.  He  must  be 
wicked  to  have  made  Aunt  Isabella  leave  him  as  she  did."  "  She 
didn't  leave  him,"  said  the  boy;  "you  shan't  contradict  me." 
"  She  did,"  cried  my  young  lady.  "Well,  I'll  tell  you  something," 
said  Linton.  "Your  mother  hated  your  father;  now  then." 
"Oh  !  "  exclaimed  Catherine,  too  enraged  to  continue.  "  And  she 
loved  mine,"  added  he.  "You  little  liar  !  I  hate  you  now!  "  she 
panted,  and  her  face  grew  red  with  passion.  "  She  did !  she  did!  " 
sang  Linton,  sinking  into  the  recess  of  his  chair,  and  leaning 
back  his  head  to  enjoy  the  agitation  of  the  other  disputant, 
who  stood  behind.  "Hush,  Master  Heathcliff!"  I  said;  "that's 
your  father's  tale,  too,  I  suppose."  "It  isn't;  you  hold  your 
tongue,"  he  answered.  "  She  did,  she  did,  Catherine !  she  did, 
she  did!" 

Cathy,  beside  herself,  gave  the  chair  a  violent  push,  and 
caused  him.  to  fall  against  one  arm.  He  was  immediately  seized 
by  a  suffocating  cough  that  soon  ended  his  triumph.  It  lasted  so 
long  that  it  frightened  even  me.  As  to  his  cousin,  she  wept  with 
all  .her  might,  aghast  at  the  mischief  she  had  done,  though  she  said 
nothing.  I  held  him  till  the  fit  exhausted  itself ;  then  he  thrust 
me  away,  and  leant  his  head  down  silently.  Catherine  quelled  her 
lamentations  also,  took  a  seat  opposite,  and  looked  solemnly  into 
the  fire.  "  How  do  you  feel  now,  Master  Heathcliff?  "  I  inquired, 
after  waiting  ten  minutes.  "  I  wish  she  felt  as  I  do,"  he  replied; 

" spiteful,  cruel  thing  !  And  I  was  better  to-day;  and  there " 

his  voice  died  in  a  whimper.  "/  didn't  strike  you!"  muttered 
Cathy,  chewing  her  lip  to  prevent  another  burst  of  emotion.  He 
sighed  and  moaned  like  one  under  great  suffering,  and  kept  it  up 


220  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

for  a  quarter  of  an  hour — on  purpose  to  distress  his  cousin, 
apparently,  for  whenever  he  caught  a  stifled  sob  from  her,  he  put 
new  pain  and  pathos  into  the  inflexions  of  his  voice. 

This  combination  of  utter  weakness  with  bitter 
badness  is  exactly  what  we  should  have  looked  for 
in  the  son  of  Heathcliff  and  Isabella  Linton.  And 
yet,  with  all  his  badness,  there  is  in  Linton  Heath- 
cliff  I  know  not  what  element  of  fineness  and  high 
breeding.  The  vase  holds  poison,  but  it  is  a  vase  of 
delicate  porcelain, — the  creature  is  of  demon  breed, 
but,  like  Caliban,  he  has  melodious  tones  in  him, 
something  almost  fascinating,  which,  under  favour- 
able auspices,  might  have  made  a  dainty  gentleman 
of  him,  if  never  a  brave,  healthy,  good  man. 


CHAPTEK  VI. 

HEATHCLIFF  AND  CATHERINE— WUTHERING 
HEIGHTS  NOT  A  WHOLESOME  BOOK—EMILY 
BRONTE  AND  MR.  G.  H.  LEWES. 

WHAT  Heathcliff  had  been  about  in  his  absence 
from  Wuthering  Heights  we  are  not  in- 
formed. Emily  Bronte  shows  her  unacquaintance 
with,  or,  more  probably,  her  contempt  for,  the  re- 
sources of  professional  novelists,  by  not  availing  her- 
self of  the  opportunity  of  filling  half-a-dozen  chapters 
with  an  account  of  his  adventures.  We  are  per- 
mitted, if  we  like,  to  suppose  that  he  robbed  on  the 
highway ;  but  all  we  are  told  is  that  he  returned  laden 
with  money.  Before  he  went,  it  had  become  the 
ruling  passion  of  his  soul  to  take  revenge  on  Hindley 
Earnshaw,  and  to  gratify  this  passion  he  now  ad- 
dressed himself.  His  love  for  the  elder  Catherine, 
Hindley's  sister,  was  as  intense  as  before — more  in- 
tense it  could  not  have  been  ;  but  she  had,  in  his 
absence,  become  the  wife  of  Edgar  Linton.  I  shall 
not  attempt  either  to  prove  it  likely  that  Catherine, 
loving  Heathcliff  as  she  did,  would  have  married 
Linton  in  real  life,  or  to  show  that  her  marriage  is 
pardonable  in  art.  It  was  one  of  those  unlikely 


222  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

things  which,  nevertheless,  constantly  happen.  She 
was  wayward,  wilful,  fantastically  perverse  and 
capricious  as  it  is  possible  for  woman  to  be ;  she 
was  little  more  than  a  girl.  To  calculate  the  pro- 
ceedings even  of  a  man  of  genius  is  impossible,  and 
what  is  there  that  a  woman  of  genius — and  a  vein 
of  fiery  genius  there  certainly  was  in  Catherine — may 
not  do  ? 

Her  own  account  of  her  motives  will,  at  least,  give 
us  some  idea  of  her  character.  She  was  not,  she 
explained  to  Nelly  Dean,  of  the  steady-going,  respect- 
able, angelic  order  of  women.  If  the  truth  must  be 
told,  the  wild  moors  were  more  to  her  taste  than 
heaven,  and  she  would  rather  be  among  the  flowers 
of  the  dells  than  bask  on  meadows  of  asphodel.  "  If 
I  were  in  heaven,  Nelly,  I  should  be  extremely  miser- 
able  I  dreamt  once  that  I  was  there. 

.  .  .  .  Heaven  did  not  seem  to  be  my  home ; 
and  I  broke  my  heart  with  weeping  to  come  back  to 
earth  ;  and  the  angels  were  so  angry  that  they  flung 
me  out  into  the  middle  of  the  heath  on  the  top  of 
Wuthering  Heights,  where  I  woke  sobbing  for  joy." 
The  reader  will  do  well  to  remember  that  Emily 
Bronte  could  not  live  away  from  the  moors,  could 
not  get  her  heart  to  fix  with  right  satisfaction  on 
anything  away  from  the  moors.  She  took  an  engage- 
ment in  England;  but  she  pined  inconsolably,  and, 
to  save  her  life,  they  had  to  bring  her  back  to 
Haworth.  She  went  with  Charlotte  to  Brussels  ; 
but  even  the  excitement  of  new  splendours,  new 


Heathcliff  and  Catherine.  223 

associates,  new  pursuits,  which  effectually  weaned 
Charlotte  from  the  nest  among  the  hills,  had  no 
power  upon  Emily.  "  I've  no  more  business,"  said 
Catherine,  "  to  marry  Edgar  Linton  than  I  have  to 
be  in  heaven."  Heathcliff  was  the  wild  Wuthering 
Heights  of  her  heart,  that  she  loved  better  than 
Linton,  with  his  heaven  of  Thrushcross  Grange.  Of 
Heathcliff  she  said,  "He's  more  myself  than  I  am. 
Whatever  our  souls  are  made  of,  his  and  mine  are 
the  same  ;  and  Linton's  is  as  different  as  a  moon- 
beam from  lightning  or  frost  from  fire."  Nelly  bids 
her  consider  how,  if  these  are  her  feelings,  she  will 
be  able,  when  she  is  Mrs.  Linton,  to  bear  separation 
from  Heathcliff.  She  fiercely  exclaims  that  no  separa- 
tion will  be  necessary.  "  Every  Linton  on  the  face  of 
the  earth  might  melt  into  nothing  before  I  could  con- 
sent to  forsake  Heathcliff.  Oh,  that's  not  what  I 
intend — that's  not  what  I  mean  !  I  shouldn't  be 
Mrs.  Linton  were  such  a  price  demanded.  He'll  be 
as  much  to  me  as  he  has  been  all  his  life-time.  Edgar 
mustshaFe^off  his  antipathy,  and  tolerate  him,  at 
least.  He  will,  when  he  learns  my  true  feelings 
towards  him."  This  will  seem  mere  affectation  or 
girlish  folly  unless  we  realise  the  fact,  essentially  im- 
portant in  order  to  do  justice  either  to  Catherine  or 
to  Emily  Bronte,  that  there  is  no  sensual  element 
whatever  in  Catherine's  love  for  Heathcliff,  or  in 
Heathcliff 's  love  for  her.  It  is  this  which  makes 
the  conception  of  the  pair  so  original — this  which 
proves  Emily  Bronte  to  have  had  transcendent  power 


224  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

as  an  artist.  A  mere  sensual  passion  between  Heath- 
cliff  and  Cathy  would  have  been  as  valueless  in  art 
as  that  which  vulgarises  and  defiles  the  first  canto  of 
Don  Juan.  Catherine's  idea  is  that  she  will  love 
Heathcliff  as  her  soul's  friend  and  brother,  while  her 
affection  for  her  husband  will  remain  flawless  and  un- 
sullied. Aided  by  Linton — such,  she  further  explains 
to  Nelly,  is  her  hope — she  will  rescue  Heathcliff  from 
the  cruelty  of  Hindley,  and  put  him  in  the  way  of 
rising.  Nelly,  who  speaks  for  respectable  common 
sense,  reprobates  such  a  scheme.  But  Catherine  per- 
sists in  her  self-defence,  and  tries  to  explain  how  she 
feels  about  Heathcliff,  while  avowing  that  she  cannot 
put  the  matter  into  words.  "  I  cannot  express  it ; 
but  surely  you  and  everybody  have  a  notion  that 
there  is,  or  should  be,  an  existence  of  yours  beyond 
you.  ...  If  all  else  perished  and  he  remained,  I 
should  still  continue  to  be  ;  and  if  all  else  remained, 
and  he  were  annihilated,  the  universe  would  turn  to 
a  mighty  stranger :  I  should  not  seem  a  part  of  it. 
My  love  for  Linton  is  like  the  foliage  in  the  woods : 
time  will  change  it,  I'm  well  aware,  as  winter  changes 
the  trees.  My  love  for  Heathcliff  resembles  the 
eternal  rocks  beneath — a  source  of  little  visible  delight, 
but  necessary.  Nelly,  I  am  Heathcliff !  He's  always, 
always  in  my  mind  :  not  as  a  pleasure,  any  more  than 
I  am  always  a  pleasure  to  myself,  but  as  my  own 
being." 

The  marriage  with   Linton  took  place,  and  when 
Heathcliff  reappeared,  Catherine   tried  to   carry   out 


Heathcliff  and  Catherine.  225 

her  plan  of    having  him   as  her  friend  on  Platonic 
principles.     Heathcliff 's  love  for  her  was  of  the  same 
kind  as  hers  for  him,  and  there  is  not  the  remotest 
suggestion — nor  does  such  ever  occur  to  her  husband 
— that  she  gives  Linton  more  cause  for  jealousy  than 
she  might  have    done  if  Heathcliff   had    been    her 
brother.     Heathcliff,  indeed,  acts  infamously,  but  not 
in  the  vulgar  way.     He  gives  rein  to  his  hatred  for 
Linton,  is  utterly  regardless   of  Linton's  happiness, 
and    produces    a    storm   of  varied    agitation   in   the 
Thrushcross  household,  which  brings  a  feverish  and 
nervous  illness  on  Catherine,  and    finally    occasions 
her    death.      Heathcliff    speaks  of   his   affection    for 
Catherine   as   Catherine  had  spoken  of  hers  for  him. 
She  is  his  life,  his  soul.     If  she  dies,  he  will  live  with 
his  soul  in  the  grave.     He  charges  her  with  having 
broken  his  heart    and  her  own  in   leaving  him  and 
marrying  Linton.     "  You  loved  me  — then  what  right 
had  you  to  leave  me  ? "      "  Let    me  alone,    let    me 
alone,"  sobbed  Catherine.     "If  I've  done  wrong,  I'm 
dying  for  it.     It  is  enough  !     You  left  me,  too ;  but  I 
won't  upbraid  you.    I  forgive  you.    Forgive  me."    "  It 
is  hard  to  forgive,  and  to  look  at  those  eyes,  and  feel 
those  wasted  hands,"  he  answered.     "  Kiss  me  again ; 
and  don't  let  me  see  your  eyes !     I  forgive  what  you 
have  done  to  me.     I  love  my  murderer — but  yours  ! 
How  can  I?" 

She  fainted  in  Heathcliff 's  arms,  and  he  placed  her 
in  those  of  her  husband,  bidding  him  help  her.  That 
night  she  died.  "  Next  morning — bright  and  cheerful 

15 


226  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

out  of  doors — stole  softened  in  through  the  blinds  of 
the  silent  room,  and  suffused  the  couch  and  its  occu- 
pant with  a  mellow,  tender  glow.     Her  brow  smooth, 
her  lids  closed,  her  lips  wearing  an  expression  of  a 
Y     smile,  no  angel  in  heaven  could  be  more  beautiful  than 
j?  4]Aghe  appeared." 

F   v^  ^  The  death  of  Catherine  must  be  considered  to  have 
driven  Heathcliff  mad.     He  could  not  and  would  not 
•realise  that  she  had  left  him,  and  that  he  was  alone. 
%7     "Where  is  she?"  he   cried,  when  Nelly  Dean  told 
-'  him  she  was  dead ;  "  not  there — not  in  heaven — not 
v^5»\  perished — where  ?     Oh !  you  said  you  cared  nothing 
for  my  sufferings  !    And  I  pray  one  prayer — I  repeat  it 
till  my  tongue  stiffens — Catherine  Earnshaw,  may  you 
not  rest  as  long  as  I  am  living!      You  said  I  killed 
you — haunt  me,  then !    The  murdered  do  haunt  their 
murderers,  I  believe.     I  know  that  ghosts  have  wan- 
dered on  earth.     Be  with  me  always — take  any  form — 
drive  me  mad !  only  do  not  leave  me  in  this  abyss, 
where  I  cannot  find  you !     I  cannot  live  without  my 
life  !    I  cannot  live  without  my  soul ! "    Having  uttered 
these  words,  Heathcliff  dashed  his  head  against  the 
knotted  trunk  of  a  tree,  and  "  howled,  not  like  a  man, 
but  like  a  savage  beast  being  goaded  to  death  with 
knives  and  spears." 

For  eighteen  years  after  Catherine's  death,  he  be- 
lieved himself  haunted  by  her  presence.  In  paroxysms 
of  agonised  entreaty  he  implored  her  to  make  herself 
more  sensibly  present ;  and  at  last  his  mania  rose  to 
such  a  pitch  that  he  believed  she  had  granted  his 


Heathcliff  Mad.  227 


request,  and  was  near  him,  generally  invisible,  but 
sometimes  in  visible  form.  Before  entering  on  this 
last  stage  of  his  malady,  he  had  been  atrociously 
wicked  and  cruel.  He  completed  the  ruin  of  Hindley 
by  gambling  and  intoxication,  he  diabolically  ill-treated 
his  own  wife  and  son.  Even  to  young  Cathy,  the 
daughter  of  his  Catherine,  he  acted  with  revolting 
cruelty,  until  the  shade  or  spectre  of  her  mother 
seemed  to  arise  to  protect  her.  The  last  phase  of  his/  rf 
madness  was  that  of  tolerance  for  others  and  harsh-  * 
ness  to  himself.  He  went  about  in  a  high  fever, 
declining  food,  and  roaming,  night  and  day,  on  the 
moors.  Then  he  died,  and  was  buried.  But  if  the 
dwellers  on  the  moors  might  be  believed,  he  was  not 
at  rest,  and  was  not  alone.  "  That  old  man,"  says 
Nelly  Dean,  "by  the  kitchen  fire  affirms  he  has  seen 
two  on  'em,  looking  out  of  his  chamber  window  on 
every  rainy  night  since  his  death :  and  an  odd  thing 
happened  to  me  about  a  month  ago.  I  was  going  to 
the  Grange  one  evening — a  dark  evening,  threatening 
thunder — and,  just  at  the  turn  of  the  Heights,  I  en- 
countered a  little  boy  with  a  sheep  and  two  lambs 
before  him ;  he  was  crying  terribly,  and  I  supposed 
the  lambs  were  skittish,  and  would  not  be  guided. 
'  What  is  the  matter,  my  little  man  ? '  I  asked. 
'  There's  Heathcliff  and  a  woman,  yonder,  under 
t'Nab,'  he  blubbered,  *  un'  I  darnut  pass  'em.'  " 

Such,  in  imperfect  and  sketchy  outline,  are  the 
main  features  of  this  astonishing  book.  My  sketch 
of  its  contents  does  less  than  justice  to  the  author; 

15—2 


228  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

but  enough  has  been  said  and  quoted  to  convey  some 
idea  of  Wuthering  Heights.  It  is  a  work  of  great 
genius,  but  of  genius  reared  within  sight  of  graves, 
and  amid  the  winds  and  mists  of  the  moorland.  The 
morbid  and  maddening  affection  with  which  Heathcliff 
and  Catherine  cling  to  each  other  was  exactly  such  an 
affection,  so  intense,  so  unreasonable,  so  original,  as 
that  with  which  Emily  Bronte  clung  to  Haworth. 
And  on  Emily,  as  on  Catherine,  death  descended  in 
the  prime  of  her  years.  With  few  changes,  the  illness 
and  death  of  Catherine  might  stand  for  the  illness 
and  death  of  Emily.  The  book  cannot  be  pronounced 
a  good  or  a  wholesome  book.  It  exaggerates  the  evil 
that  is  in  the  world,  for  it  does  not  show  the  light  in 
due  proportion  to  the  darkness.  If  Haworth  Par- 
sonage, beside  its  graves,  moaned  around  by  the  wind 
of  the  moors,  were  all  the  world,  then  might  the 
gloom  of  Wuthering  Heights  be  accepted  for  the 
atmosphere  of  the  planet.  But  it  is  not  so ;  and  the 
best  that  can  be  said  for  the  book  is  that  it  is  the 
product  of  marvellous  genius  that  never  freely  and 
genially  expanded ;  genius  that  never  rose  into  the 
blue  sky  of  hope  and  joy ;  genius  that  seems  to  have 
watched,  and  wailed,  and  waited  for  God,  and  yet 
never  once  saw  His  eye  light  up  the  "  wildering 
clouds  "  above  and  around. 

Curiously  suggestive,  in  relation  to  Emily  Bronte, 
is  Charlotte's  reference  to  the  late  Mr.  G.  H.  Lewes  : 

"  I  have  seen  Lewes  too I  could  not  feel 

otherwise  to   him  than  half  sadly,  half  tenderly — a 


Emily  Bronte  and  Mr.  Lewes.  229 

queer  word  that  last ;  but  I  use  it  because  the  aspect 
of  Lewes's  face  almost  moves  me  to  tears ;  it  is  so 
wonderfully  like  Emily — her  eyes,  her  features,  the 
very  nose,  the  somewhat  prominent  mouth,  the  fore- 
head ;  even,  at  moments,  the  expression."  This  is  the 
sole  resource  we  have  in  realising  the  face  of  Emily 
Bronte,  since  no  portrait  except  the  "rough  and 
common-looking  oil-painting,"  executed  by  her  brother 
in  his  boyhood,  which  Charlotte  did  not  think  worth 
mention  when  her  publishers  wanted  likenesses  of  her 
sisters,  was  taken  of  her.  That  she  should  have 
resembled  Mr.  Lewes,  both  in  features  and  expression, 
seems  at  first  surprising.  Whether  there  is,  or  is  not, 
an  art  to  read  the  mind's  construction  in  the  face,  it 
is  certain  that,  unless  what  her  Yorkshire  neighbours 
alleged  as  to  the  moroseness  and  reserve  of  Emily 
Bronte  be  calumnious,  and  unless  the  settled  gloom 
of  her  writings  bears  false  witness,  her  disposition  and 
temperament  were  pointedly  in  contrast  with  those  of 
G.  H.  Lewes,  one  of  the  most  vivacious,  nimble- 
spirited  and  happy-spirited  of  authors.  Nevertheless, 
it  is  unquestionable  that  the  basis  of  his  entire  scheme 
of  thought  was  the  proposition  that  man  has,  and  can 
have,  no  certitude  respecting  immortality  and  God. 
He  had  travelled  to  all  shrines  of  wisdom ;  consulted 
the  sages  of  antiquity  and  the  philosophers  of  Europe ; 
listened  to  Descartes  and  Leibnitz  and  Spinoza,  to 
Hume  and  Kant  and  Reid,  and,  lastly,  to  Comte  ; 
and  announced  to  his  countrymen,  as  the  result,  in 
lucid  English,  and  with  the  serene  good-humour  of 

(  UNIVERSITl! 


230  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

perfect  assurance,  that  God,  if  He  did  exist,  was  the 
unknown  X  of  the  universe — beyond  reason,  beyond 
faith,  beyond  possible  communion.  Whether,  in  the 
course  of  arriving  at  this  conclusion,  Mr.  Lewes  passed 
through  seasons  of  mental  anguish,  I  cannot  tell ;  but 
his  books  are  remarkable  for  their  genial  vivacity, 
their  sweetness  of  tone  and  temper,  their  almost 
unparalleled  range,  not  only  of  tolerance,  but  of 
sympathetic  and  kindly  tolerance.  Having  entirely 
satisfied  himself  that  there  is  no  Infinite  Spirit  in 
the  universe  corresponding  in  any  sense  to  the  father 
in  a  human  household,  or  the  king  in  a  nation  of  men, 
he  betrays  no  sense  of  bereavement,  gives  no  sign  of 
sorrow.  He  does  not,  indeed,  exult ;  arrogance  and 
scornful  flippancy  belong  to  a  lower  and  baser  kind  of 
man ;  but  neither  is  he  in  the  least  distressed,  and  we 
feel  that,  if  questioned  on  the  point,  he  would  have 
said  that  his  no-belief  was  true,  and  that  to  dwell  with 
truth  must  always  be  better  for  man  than  to  yield  to 
the  most  soothing  falsehood. 

I  beg  to  have  it  clearly  understood  that  I  do  not  put 
forward  the  theory  that  Emily  Bronte  was  an  atheist. 
Charlotte  has  let  fall  no  hint  to  that  effect,  and  if 
Emily  had  made  up  her  mind  that  there  is  no  God,  it 
seems  highly  improbable  that  she  could  have  pre- 
vented a  sister  with  whom  she  lived  on  terms  of 
unusual  confidence  and  affection  from  having  some 
glimpse  of  the  fact.  Charlotte  herself  was  not  only 
a  believer  in  God,  but  derived  perpetual  practica^ 
sustenance  in  her  daily  life  and  work  from  refer- 


Emily  Bronte  not  an  Atheist.  231 

ence  to  a  Judge  who  could  not  err  and  a  Father 
who  could  not  misunderstand.  When  she  read  the 
atheistic  volume  published  by  Miss  Martineau  and 
Mr.  Atkinson,  she  shrank  back  appalled  from  the 
abyss  then  first  opened  to  her.  "  Sincerely,"  she 
said,  "  for  my  own  part,  do  I  wish  to  find  and 
know  the  Truth ;  but  if  this  be  Truth,  well  may 
she  guard  herself  with  mysteries  and  cover  herself 
with  a  veil.  If  this  be  Truth,  man  or  woman  who 
beholds  her  can  but  curse  the  day  he  or  she  was 
born."  These  words  remind  one  of  those  in  which 
Sir  William  Hamilton  declares  that  if  atheism  were 
true,  the  last  word  of  philosophy  to  man  would  be 
the  terrific  message  of  the  oracle  to  CEdipus,  "  May 
you  never  know  the  secret  of  your  birth." 

Emily  Bronte,  as  I  conceive  her  character,  occupied 
the  position  of  having  sought  God  and  not  found  Him, 
but  did  not  proceed  to  infer  that  He  had  never  been 
found,  and  had  no  existence.  She  was  oppressed  with 
a  sense  of  the  power  of  evil  and  the  ineffectuality  of 
good,  and  yearned  with  inexpressible  and  agonised 
earnestness  for  a  clearer  discovery  of  God  than  she 
had  been  able  to  attain  to.  She  would  not  use  a 
language  she  could  not  verify,  or  pretend  to  trace  the 
light  of  God's  eye  when  she  could  not  see  it ;  but  she 
was  solitary  and  sad,  no  human  being  rightly  compre- 
hended her,  and  her  writings  are  a  despairing  cry  to 
God  for  light.  A  universe  without  God  was  for  her  a 
universe  of  night  and  chaos,  the  wail  of  infinite  be- 
reavement rising  from  its  human  habitations.  But  it 


232  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

is  a  highly  remarkable  circumstance  that,  with  so  deep 
a  similarity,  and  at  the  same  time  so  marked  a  dis- 
similarity, in  their  relation  to  the  fundamental  beliefs 
of  religion,  Emily  Bronte  and  G.  H.  Lewes  should 
have  had  the  same,  certainly  uncommon,  type  of 
physiognomy. 


CHAPTEE  VII. 

CHAELOTTE  BEONTE  ON  WUTHERING  HEIGHTS 
—CHARLOTTE  AND  EMILY  IN  BRUSSELS— 
CHARLOTTE  'S  STYLE-  THE  PROFESSOR- 
BELGIAN  SCENERY  —  VILLETTE  —  THE 
SCHOOL  SCENES  IN  JANE  EYRE. 


BEONTE  puts  into  brilliant  and 
picturesque  language  a  theory,  partly  expla- 
natory, partly  apologetic,  on  the  subject  of  such 
literary  work  as  we  have  in  Wuthering  Heights. 
"Whether,"  she  says,  "it  is  right  or  advisable  to 
create  beings  like  Heathcliff,  I  do  not  know:  I 
scarcely  think  it  is.  But  this  I  know;  the  writer 
who  possesses  the  creative  gift  owns  something  of 
which  he  is  not  always  master  —  something  that,  at 
times,  strangely  wills  and  works  for  itself.  He  may 
lay  down  rules  and  devise  principles,  and  to  rules  and 
principles  it  will,  perhaps,  for  years  lie  in  subjection  ; 
and  then,  haply  without  any  warning  of  revolt,  there 
comes  a  time  when  it  will  no  longer  consent  to 
'  harrow  the  valleys,  or  be  bound  with  a  band  in  the 
furrow  '  —  when  it  '  laughs  at  the  multitude  of  the  city, 
and  regards  not  the  crying  of  the  driver  '  —  when,  re- 


234  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

fusing  absolutely  to  make  ropes  out  of  sea-sand  any 
longer,  it  sets  to  work  on  statue-hewing,  and  you  have 
a  Pluto  or  a  Jove,  a  Tisiphone  or  a  Psyche,  a  Mer- 
maid or  a  Madonna,  as  Fate  or  Inspiration  direct.  Be 
the  work  grim  or  glorious,  dread  or  divine,  you  have 
little  choice  left  but  quiescent  adoption.  As  for  you — 
the  nominal  artist — your  share  in  it  has  been  to  work 
passively  under  dictates  you  neither  delivered  nor 
could  question — that  would  not  be  uttered  at  your 
prayer,  nor  suppressed  nor  changed  at  your  caprice." 
That  genius  is  apt  to  lay  imperative  commands  on  its 
possessor,  and  that  there  is  the  inspiration  of  genius  in 
Wuihering  Heights,  I  should  be  the  last  to  dispute ; 
but  it  were  rash  to  admit  that  genius  is  not  responsible 
for  its  creations.  And  even  if  this  were  granted,  it 
would  remain  incontrovertible  that  the  characteristic 
creations  of  literary  genius — the  portraits  it  delights  to 
depict,  the  scenes  it  loves  to  describe,  the  incidents  it 
habitually  invents— are  trustworthy  indications  of  the 
nature  of  the  artist.  Even  the  religious  inspiration, 
which  is  more  intense  and  transforming  in  its  potency 
than  the  literary  inspiration,  has  been  held  by  all  wise 
theologians  to  irradiate  but  never  to  obliterate  or  mis- 
represent the  natural  character.  Both  the  poems  and 
the  prose  work  of  Emily  Bronte  lie  in  pessimistic 
shadow  as  dark  and  deep  as  that  cast  by  the  storm- 
clouds  on  the  sea  in  Turner's  murkiest  pictures  of 
shipwreck.  We  ought,  indeed,  to  recollect  that  she 
died  young ;  that  young  persons  of  genius  are  apt  to 
lay  stress  upon  the  tragic  tones  in  life;  that,  if  she 


Charlotte  on   Wuthering  Heights.  235 

had  lived  to  be  sixty,  she  might  have  produced  so 
many  sunny  and  healthy  works,  that  the  grim 
grotesque  of  her  'prentice  hand  would  have  been 
thrown  into  the  background.  Against  this,  however, 
we  must  in  fairness  set  the  fact,  that  the  execution  of 
Wuthering  Heights  is  singularly  mature — the  style 
such  as  practised  and  consummate  writers  use,  the 
sentiment  free  of  young-mannish  bravura,  and,  still 
more,  of  young- womanish  syllabub.  The  author  never 
seems  for  one  moment  to  lose  her  self-possession  and 
self-command.  Had  Shakespeare  written  Lear  before 
he  was  thirty,  and  died,  we  should  have  had  a  right  to 
believe  that  he  took  a  pessimistic  view  of  life  ;  and  of 
Emily  Bronte  we  must  hold  that  she  was  morbidly 
pessimistic.  "  I  am  oppressed,"  says  Charlotte,  after 
reading  the  book  anew  in  1850 :  "  the  reader  is 
scarcely  ever  permitted  a  taste  of  unalloyed  pleasure  ; 
every  beam  of  sunshine  is  poured  down  through  black 
bars  of  threatening  cloud ;  every  page  is  surcharged 
with  a  sort  of  moral  electricity." 

It  is,  however,  the  sunny  book — above  all,  it  is  the 
sunny  novel — that  the  world  most  cordially  takes  to  ; 
and  we  may  doubt  whether  Emily  Bronte's  name 
would  ever  have  obtained  a  place  in  the  chronicles 
of  English  literature,  if  the  more  buoyant  and  happy 
genius  of  her  sister  had  not  fairly  scaled  the  horizon, 
and  drawn  all  eyes  to  the  wonder  that  had  appeared 
somewhere  among  the  Yorkshire  hills. 

Mr.  Wemyss  Keid  seems  to  me  to  be  correct  in 
deciding  that  the  main  determining  incident  in 


236  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

Charlotte  Bronte's  life  was  not  the  death  of  her 
brother,  but  her  own  residence,  at  two  successive 
periods,  in  Brussels.  When  the  change — to  her  im- 
mense— from  native  Yorkshire  to  the  Belgian  capital 
took  place,  she  was  twenty-six  years  old,  but  had  very 
much  to  learn.  M.  Heger,  the  head  of  the  seminary 
to  which  she  went  as  a  pupil,  declared  that  she  and 
her  sister  Emily  knew  nothing  of  French.  He  meant, 
I  presume,  that  they  had  no  extensive  or  finely  accu- 
rate acquaintance  with  the  language,  and  set  about 
drilling  them  in  the  fashion  adopted  with  his  advanced 
French  and  Belgian  pupils.  His  experience  with  the 
sisters  was  what  we  should  have  expected.  "  Emily," 
says  Mrs.  Gaskell,  summarising  the  Belgian  head- 
master's estimate,  "had  a  head  for  logic,  and  a  capa- 
bility for  argument,  unusual  in  a  man,  and  rare,  in- 
deed, in  a  woman."  He  thought  Emily  abler  than 
Charlotte ;  but,  unfortunately,  "  a  stubborn  tenacity 
of  will,"  "  impairing "  in  his  view  the  force  of  her 
genius,  rendered  her  occasionally  impervious  to  his 
instructions,  "  where  her  own  wishes,  or  her  own 
sense  of  right,  was  concerned."  We  may  interpret 
this  to  mean  that  she  chose  to  retain  in  her  com- 
positions the  idiom  of  her  native  English,  and  in  con- 
ventional morals  her  "heretic"  and  Protestant  ideas, 
rather  than  to  have  her  forms  of  expression  and  her 
notions  of  truth  passed  through  M.  Heger's  mill.  The 
style  of  Emily  Bronte  is  thoroughly  English. 

In  Charlotte's  case  M.  Heger  had  not  to  deplore 
any    tenacity    of   will  resisting  his   influence.      She 


Charlotte  and  M.  Heger.  237 

delighted  in  feeling  herself  once  more  a  schoolgirl. 
"  It  is  natural,"  she  said,  "  to  me  to  submit,  and  very 
unnatural  to  command."  I  believe  the  characterisa- 
tion to  be  just.  It  would  be  correct  also,  if  applied  to 
Mrs.  Barrett  Browning,  and,  I  think,  though  some 
might  dispute  the  fact,  to  George  Eliot.  But  there 
are  women  to  whom  it  does  not  apply,  women  to 
whom  it  is  unnatural  and  painful  to  submit,  and 
natural  and  pleasant  to  command.  Emily  Bronte,  I 
take  it,  was  one  of  these  last.  Whether  submission 
would  have  been  so  pleasant  for  Charlotte  if  M.  Heger 
had  not  been  what  he  was,  may  remain  a  question. 
Him  she  describes  as  "  a  man  of  power  as  to  mind, 
but  very  choleric  and  irritable  in  temperament."  The 
words  describe  the  essential  characteristic  of  Charlotte 
Bronte's  pet  hero,  be  his  name  Rochester,  or  be  it 
Moore,  or  be  it  Paul  Emanuel.  A  clever  man,  with 
strongly-marked  features,  who  is  fervently  in  love 
with  a  plain  girl,  to  whom,  while  he  longs  to  clasp 
her  to  his  heart,  he  talks  harshly,  is  the  man  whom 
Charlotte  Bronte  always  hero-worships. 

Under  M.  Heger 's  auspices  and  instruction,  Char- 
lotte learned  to  write  French  so  well  that  her  English 
style  became  thenceforward  characteristically  French. 
Her  devoir  on  the  death  of  Napoleon  is  written  in 
French  which  I  may  err  in  pronouncing  classic  of  the 
best  modern  French  school ;  but  it  certainly  has  a 
tone  and  air  characteristically  French,  and  yet  it 
reads  exactly  like  a  passage  from  her  English  prose 
translated  into  French.  "  Napoleon  " — this  is  the 


238  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

opening  passage — "  naquit  en  Corse  et  mourut  a  Ste. 
Helene.  Entre  ces  deux  lies  rien  qu'un  vaste  et 
brulant  desert  et  1'ocean  immense.  II  naquit  fils  d'un 
simple  gentilhomme,  et  mourut  empereur,  mais  sans 
couronne  et  dans  les  fers.  Entre  son  berceau  et  sa 
tombe  qu'y  a-t-il  ?  La  carriere  d'un  soldat  parvenu,  des 
champs  de  bataille,  un  mer  de  sang,  un  trone,  puis  de 
sang  encore,  et  des  fers.  La  vie,  c'est  1'arc  en  ciel ; 
les  deux  points  extremes  touchant  la  terre,  la  comble 
lumineuse  mesure  les  cieux.  Sur  Napoleon  au  berceau 
une  mere  brillait;  dans  la  maison  paternelle  il  avait 
des  freres  et  des  soeurs ;  plus  tard  dans  son  palais  il  eut 
une  femme  qui  1'aimait.  Mais  £ur  son  lit  de  mort 
Napoleon  est  seul ;  plus  de  mere,  ni  de  frere,  ni  de 
soeur,  ni  de  femme,  ni  d' enfant !  !  D'autres  ont  dit  et 
rediront  ses  exploits,  moi,  je  m'arrete  a  contempler 
I'abandonnement  de  sa  derniere  heure  !  " 

Did  not  the  writer  of  this  evidently,  while  writing 
it,  think  in  French?  And  did  not  Charlotte  Bronte, 
when  writing  in  English,  write  in  exactly  the  same 
way?  In  other  words,  her  style  was  French.  In 
some  very  important  respects  no  style  could  be  better. 
It  is  clear  as  crystal,  pointed  as  diamond,  admirably 
fitted  for  rapid  and  animated  narrative,  as  well  as  for 
the  description  of  passion.  But  I  think  that,  in 
variety  and  expressiveness,  it  is  not  equal  to  those 
English  styles  which  are  formed  on  the  best  Teutonic 
models.  The  ornamental,  the  fashionable,  the  courtly, 
to  a  great  extent  also  the  martial  elements  in  our 
language,  are  French ;  the  homelier  and  the  heartier 


Charlotte's  Style  French.  239 

are  Teutonic;  and  striking  as  is  much  of  the  prose 
written  by  those  of  our  young  authors  who  have 
brought  French  models  again  into  vogue,  it  cannot 
vie,  in  respect  of  expressiveness,  or  home-bred  tender- 
ness, or  Doric  simplicity  and  idiomatic  pith  and 
melody,  with  the  prose  of  Carlyle's  early  essays,  such 
as  that  on  Burns,  or  the  prose  in  which  George  Eliot 
wrote  Silas  Marner.  The  culture,  both  of  Carlyle 
and  George  Eliot,  was  mainly  German. 

Of  her  experience  in  Brussels,  Charlotte  Bronte 
availed  herself  in  the  composition  of  two  novels,  her 
first  and  her  last — The  Professor  and  Villette.  Critics 
have  loudly  praised  Villette,  and  I  do  not  recollect 
seeing  anything  said  in  commendation  of  The  Pro- 
fessor;  but  I  own  to  finding  it  a  stiffer  business  to 
read  the  later  than  the  earlier  book.  The  Professor,  I 
make  bold  to  say,  has  not  received  due  appreciation. 
It  is  by  no  means  a  wonderful  book,  but  it  has  signal 
merits.  Nothing  could  be  more  sharp  than  the  chisel- 
ling of  the  characters,  which  are  neither  uninteresting 
nor  commonplace,  and  the  story  is  full  of  life.  Huns- 
den  is  unmistakably  a  first  sketch  of  the  Yorke  of 
Shirley,  and  the  school  scenes,  though  not  so  care- 
fully elaborated  as  those  in  Villette,  are,  to  my  think- 
ing, more  fresh,  and,  in  general  respects,  about  as 
good.  Frances,  of  The  Professor,  is  perhaps  somewhat 
too  commonplace  for  a  heroine  :  but  not  even  a  critic 
has,  to  my  knowledge,  been  found  who  could  care  for 
the  Lucy  Snowe  of  Villette.  The  following  passage 
will  enable  us  to  realise  the  hopeful  and  cheerful  spirit 


240  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

of  Charlotte  Bronte's  first  book,  and  has  a  biographical 
interest  as  manifestly  recalling  the  impressions  with 
which  she  first  looked  upon  Belgium. 

Belgium  !  name  unromantic  and  unpoetic,  yet  name  that  when- 
ever uttered  has  in  my  ear  a  sound,  in  my  heart  an  echo,  such  as 
no  other  assemblage  of  syllables,  however  sweet  or  classic,  can 
produce.  Belgium !  I  repeat  the  word,  now  as  I  sit  alone  near 
midnight.  It  stirs  my  world  of  the  past  like  a  summons  to 
resurrection;  the  graves  unclose,  the  dead  are  raised;  thoughts* 
feelings,  memories  that  slept  are  seen  by  me  ascending  from  the 
clods — haloed  most  of  them ;  but  while  I  gaze  on  their  vapoury 
forms,  and  strive  to  ascertain  definitely  their  outline,  the  sound 
which  wakened  them  dies,  and  they  sink,  each  and  all,  like  a  light 
wreath  of  mist,  absorbed  in  the  mould,  re-called  to  urns,  re-sealed 
in  monuments.  Farewell,  luminous  phantoms ! 

This  is  Belgium,  reader.     Look !  don't  call  the  picture  a  flat  or 
a  dull  one — it  was  neither  flat  nor  dull  to  me  when  I  first  beheld 
it.     When  I  left  Ostend  on  a  mild  February  morning,  and  found 
myself  on  the  road  to  Brussels,  nothing  could  look  vapid  to  me- 
My  sense  of  enjoyment  possessed  an  edge  whetted  to  the  finest — 
untouched,  keen,  exquisite.      I  was  young ;    I  had  good  health  5 
pleasure  and  I  had  never  met ;  no  indulgence  of  hers  had  enervated 
or  sated  one  faculty  of  my  nature.     Liberty  I  clasped  in  my  arms 
for  the  first  time,  and  the  influence  of  her  smile  and  embrace 
revived  my  life  like  the  sun  and  the  west  wind.    Yes,  at  that  epoch 
I  felt  like  a  morning  traveller  who  doubts  not  that  from  the  hill  he 
is  ascending  he  shall  behold  a  glorious  sunrise  ;  what  if  the  track 
be  straight,  steep,  and  stony  ?     He  sees  it  not ;  his  eyes  are  fixed 
on  that  summit,  flushed  already,  flushed  and  gilded,  and  having 
gained  it,  he  is  certain  of  the  scene  beyond.     He  knows  that  the 
sun  will  face  him,  that  his  chariot  is  even  now  coming  over  the 
eastern  horizon,  and  that  the  herald  breeze  he  feels  on  his  cheek 
is  opening  for  the  god's  career  a  clear,  vast  path  of  azure,  amidst 
clouds  soft  as  pearl  and  warm  as  flame.     Difficulty  and  toil  were 
to  be  my  lot ;  but,  sustained  by  energy,  drawn  on  by  hopes  as 
bright  as  vague,  I  deemed  such  a  lot  no  hardship.     I  mounted 
now  the  hill  in  shade ;  there  were  pebbles,  inequalities,  briars  in 
my  path ;  but  my  eyes  were  fixed  on  the  crimson  peak  above ;  my 
imagination  was  with  the  refulgent  firmament  beyond,    and    I 


Belgium.  241 


thought  nothing  of  the  stones  turning  under  my  feet,  or  of  the 
thorns  scratching  my  face  and  hands. 

I  gazed  often,  and  always  with  delight,  from  the  window  of  the 
diligence  (these,  be  it  remembered,  were  not  the  days  of  trains  and 
railroads).  Well!  and  what  did  I  see?  I  will  tell  you  faithfully. 
Green,  reedy  swamps ;  fields  fertile,  but  flat,  cultivated  in  patches 
that  made  them  look  like  magnified  kitchen-gardens ;  belts  of  cut 
trees,  formal  as  pollard  willows,  skirting  the  horizon ;  narrow 
canals,  gliding  slow  by  the  roadside ;  painted  Flemish  farmhouses ; 
some  very  dirty  hovels;  a  grey,  dead  sky;  wet  road,  wet  fields, 
wet  house-tops  ;  not  a  beautiful,  scarcely  a  picturesque,  object  met 
my  eye  along  the  whole  route ;  yet  to  me  all  was  beautiful,  all  was 
more  than  picturesque.  It  continued  fair  so  long  as  daylight 
lasted,  though  the  moisture  of  many  preceding  damp  days  had 
sodden  the  whole  country;  as  it  grew  dark,  however,  the  rain 
recommenced,  and  it  was  through  streaming  and  starless  darknes8 
my  eye  caught  the  first  gleam  of  the  lights  of  Brussels.  I  saw 
little  of  the  city  but  its  lights  that  night.  Having  alighted  from 

the  diligence,  a  fiacre  conveyed  me  to  the  Hotel  de  ,  where  I 

had  been  advised  by  a  fellow-traveller  to  put  up.     Having  eaten  a 
traveller's  supper,  I  retired  to  bed,  and  slept  a  traveller's  sleep. 

Charlotte,  as  we  saw,  was  favourably  impressed  by 
M.  Heger,  and  enjoyed  life  in  Brussels  ;  but  one  thing 
pained  and  offended  the  instincts  of  her  nature  so 
bitterly  that  she  wrote  vehemently  of  it  both  in  her 
first  book  and  in  her  last.  The  "  plague-spot  of  dissi- 
mulation," she  said,  rested  upon  each  and  all  of 
those  girls  who  were  reared  under  the  influence  of 
Eome  and  the  Jesuits.  "  Most  of  them  could  lie  with 
audacity  when  it  appeared  advantageous  to  do  so.  All 
understood  the  art  of  speaking  fair  when  a  point  was 
to  be  gained.  Backbiting  and  tale-bearing  were  uni- 
versal." On  girls  from  the  United  Kingdom  she 
was  severe  enough,  but  she  "  could  at  a  glance  dis- 
tinguish the  daughter  of  Albion  and  nursling  of 

16 


242  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

Protestantism    from    the    foster-child  of    Borne,   the 
protegee   of  Jesuistry."     In  making  these   assertions 
Charlotte  Bronte   guards  herself  against   being  sup- 
posed to  speak  from  prejudice  against  Popish  theology. 
Her  own  experience  it  is  that  she  states,  professing 
her  inability  to  account  for  the  facts  except  on  the 
supposition  that  the  cause  "  is  to  be  found  in  the  dis- 
cipline, if  not  the  doctrines,  of  the  Church  of  Kome." 
Between  the  composition  of  The  Professor  and  that 
of  Villette,  something  like  ten  years  intervened,  and 
during  these  Charlotte  had  mingled  in  the  best  in- 
tellectual   society    of   London  ;    yet    in    Villette    the 
demoralising  influences  of  the  Romish   discipline  are 
described  with  a  force  at  least  equal  to  that  displayed 
in  the  earlier  book.     "  In  an  unguarded  moment,"  she 
writes,  in  the  person  of  her  heroine,  "  I  chanced  to  say 
that,  of  the  two  errors,  I  considered  falsehood  worse 
than  an  occasional  lapse  in  church  attendance."   From 
that  time  she  was  differently  regarded  by  the  girls. 
They  had  told  the  school  authorities  what  she  said, 
and  were  instructed  to  look  upon  her  as  dangerous. 
"Not  a  soul,"  she  says,  "in  Madame  Beck's  house, 
from  the  scullion  to  the   directress  herself,  but  was 
above  being  ashamed  of  a  lie ;  they  thought  nothing 
of  it.     '  J'ai  menti  plusieurs  fois '  formed  an  item  of 
every  girl's  and  every  woman's  monthly  confession : 
the  priest  heard  unshocked,  and  absolved  unreluctant. 
If  they  had  missed  going  to  mass,  or  read  a  chapter  of 
a  novel,  that  was  another  thing ;  these  were  crimes 
whereof  rebuke  and  penance  were  the  unfailing  meed." 


ViUette.  243 


Villette  has  been  lauded  to  the  skies  by  critics,  but 
the  book  has  never  been  popular,  and  its  failure  as 
a  pecuniary  success,  in  comparison  with  Jane  Eyre, 
was  one  of  the  bitterest  disappointments  of  Charlotte 
Bronte's  closing  years.  There  is  a  tone  of  remon- 
strance, nay,  of  irritation  and  complaint,  in  some  of 
her  references  to  the  reception  of  the  book;  and 
she  says,  half-mournfully,  haH-reproachfully,  when 
commenting  on  the  general  verdict,  that  but  two  in 
the  world  had  understood  her,  and  that  both  were 
dead.  Yet  the  result  was  not  in  the  slightest  degree 
astonishing,  nor  is  it  easy  to  believe  that,  if  Charlotte 
Bronte  had  given  full  play  to  her  excellent  critical 
faculty  in  relation  to  the  matter,  she  would  not  have 
been  able  to  anticipate,  if,  indeed,  she  would  not  have 
averted,  the  failure. 

She  wrote  the  book,  for  one  thing,  and  a  very  im- 
portant thing,  when  in  bad  health  and  suffering  under 
constant  depression.  With  immense  strength  of  will 
she  performed  her  task,  but  the  tide  of  inspiration  had 
ebbed,  and  she  wrote  with  effort.  In  the  second  place, 
she  chose  a  subject  which  presented  practically  in- 
superable difficulties.  "  Out  of  so  small  a  circle  of 
characters,"  exclaims  Mrs.  Gaskell,  in  the  plenitude 
of  her  admiration,  "  dwelling  in  so  dull  and  mono- 
tonous an  area  as  a  '  pension,'  this  wonderful  tale 
was  evolved  !  "  Yes.  The  tale  deserves  the  epithet, 
wonderful.  All  honour  to  the  author  who  wielded  the 
magical  wand  that  "  evolved  "  its  scenes  and  incidents  ; 
all  credit  to  the  critics  who  celebrated  the  feat  "with 

16—2 


244  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

one  burst  of  acclamation."  But  the  great  world  does 
not  care  a  straw  whether  a  work  of  fiction  is  a  miracle 
of  evolution  or  not,  but  only  whether  the  thing  evolved 
is  an  interesting  novel.  Charlotte  Bronte,  when 
writing  of  Miss  Austen,  seems  to  be  quite  aware  that 
the  novelist  must  have  suitable  materials  if  he  is  to 
succeed.  She  complains  that,  in  Pride  and  Prejudice, 
we  have  "  a  carefully-fenced,  highly-cultivated  garden, 
with  neat  borders  and  delicate  flowers  ;  but  no  glance 
of  a  bright,  vivid  physiognomy,  no  open  country,  no 
fresh  air,  no  blue  hill,  no  bonny  beck."  And  what 
have  we  in  Villette?  The  routine  of  what  Mrs. 
Gaskell  calls  a  "pension" — the  schoolrooms  and 
dwelling-rooms  and  fine  gardens  of  an  educational 
establishment  in  Brussels.  It  must  be  confessed  that 
the  interest  of  mankind  in  education,  as  a  subject  of 
entertainment,  is  limited.  Schoolmasters  and  school- 
mistresses, clever  and  affectionate  pupils,  or  stupid  and 
heartless,  are  not  capable  of  being  made  so  interesting 
to  the  mass  of  mankind  as  more  picturesque  and 
open-air  personages.  And  then  the  charm  at  which 
Charlotte  so  felicitously  hints — the  charm  of  blue  hill 
and  bonny  beck,  of  woods  and  moors,  and  craggy 
heathery  dells — the  charm  whose  fascination  is  so 
pervasively  felt  in  Jane  Eyre  and  Shirley,  is  absent 
in  Villette. 

School  life,  skilfully  treated,  may,  of  course,  come  in 
admirably  in  a  novel,  but  it  must  by  no  means  occupy 
almost  the  whole  of  the  three  volumes.  In  Jane  Eyre 
the  school  scenes  are  telling  and  effective.  Whether 


The  School  Scenes  in  Jane  Eyre.  245 

it  is  because  the  few  chapters  in  which  we  are  intro- 
duced to  Mr.  Brocklehurst  and  Miss  Temple,  to  Miss 
Scatcherd  and  Helen  Burns,  are  written  with  more 
subtle  and  heart-reaching  power  than  the  ampler 
descriptions  of  school  life  in  The  Professor  and  Villette, 
or  whether  it  is  simply  because  they  are  short,  certain 
it  is  that  they  excite  a  far  livelier  interest  than  is 
awakened  by  the  others.  The  school-girl,  Jane  Eyre, 
is  a  singularly  vivid  and  accurate  miniature  likeness  of 
Charlotte  herself.  The  impetuosity  with  which  little 
Jane  resents  injustice,  whether  to  herself  or  to  her 
friends — the  fierce  haste,  for  instance,  with  which  she 
tears  from  the  forehead  of  Helen  Burns,  and  flings  into 
the  fire,  the  badge  of  "  Slattern" — can  hardly  fail  to 
remind  us  of  Charlotte's  curt  and  stinging  letter  to 
Mr.  Lewes,  when  she  thought  he  had  unfairly  criti- 
cised her,  after  having  made  demonstrations  of  friend- 
liness. "I  can  be  on  my  guard  against  my  enemies, 
but  God  deliver  me  from  my  friends  ! " 

In  describing  Helen  Burns,  a  true  effect  in  pathos  is 
attained,  and  pathos  is  rare  in  Charlotte  Bronte's 
books.  "  When  I  should  be  listening  to  Miss 
Scatcherd,"  says  the  self-accusing  Helen,  "  and  col- 
lecting all  she  says  with  assiduity,  often  I  lose  the 
very  sound  of  her  voice.  I  fall  into  a  sort  of  dream. 
Sometimes  I  think  I  am  in  Northumberland,  and  that 
the  noises  I  hear  round  me  are  the  bubbling  of  a  little 
brook,  which  runs  through  Deepden  near  our  house ; 
— then,  when  it  comes  to  my  turn  to  reply,  I  have  to 
be  wakened ;  and,  having  heard  nothing  of  what  was 


246  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

read  for  listening  to  the  visionary  brook,  I  have  no 
answer  ready."  The  reference  to  the  brooks  of  North- 
umberland reminds  us  that  we  are  in  the  country; 
and  this  is  not  the  only  touch  of  out-of-door  and  out- 
of-town  fascination  that  tends  to  make  it  pleasanter  to 
read  of  the  Lowood  Seminary  than  of  the  more  im- 
posing one  in  Brussels.  Here  is  another  glimpse  of 
the  sylvan  surroundings  of  Lowood  : — "  April  advanced 
to  May.  A  bright,  serene  May  it  was ;  days  of  blue 
sky,  placid  sunshine,  and  soft  western  or  southern 
gales  filled  up  its  duration.  And  now  vegetation 
matured  with  vigour  ;  Lowood  shook  loose  its  tresses ; 
it  became  all  green,  all  flowery.  Its  great  elm,  ash, 
and  oak  skeletons  were  restored  to  majestic  life ;  wood- 
land plants  sprang  up  profusely  in  its  recesses ;  un- 
numbered varieties  of  moss  filled  its  hollows,  and  it 
made  a  strange  ground-sunshine  out  of  the  wealth  of 
its  wild  primrose  plants.  I  have  seen  their  pale  gold 
gleam  in  overshadowed  spots  like  scatterings  of  the 
sweetest  lustre." 


CHAPTEE  VIII. 

JANE  EYEE— LITTLE  JANE  AND  THE  EEEDS— 
THOENF1ELD  HALL—FUENITUEE  FOETY 
YEAES  AGO— GE  ACE  POOLE  —  A  WINTER 
EVENING  WALK— MEETING  WITH  BO- 
GHESTEE. 

THE  Professor,  though  not  itself  deemed  satis- 
factory, was  considered  by  Messrs.  Smith  and 
Elder,  the  enterprising  and  sagacious  publishers  to 
whom  Charlotte  Bronte  had  offered  it,  to  afford 
evidence  that  Currer  Bell  could  produce  a  splen- 
didly successful  novel  in  three  volumes.  Charlotte's 
previous  efforts  had  been  but  enough  to  awake  in  her 
a  surmise  of  her  genius,  and  to  accustom  her  to  her 
tools  as  a  literary  artist.  She  now  worked  with  all  her 
might,  heart  engaged  as  well  as  brain,  with  that  con- 
centrated energy,  and  that  exultation  in  the  outgoing 
of  power,  which  preclude  haste  yet  secure  speed.  It 
is  a  great  mistake  to  suppose  that  when  artist-work, 
whether  of  the  pencil  or  of  the  pen,  is  quickly  done, 
it  is  necessarily  hastily  done.  Haste  throws  off  with 
slovenly  indifference  sheet  after  sheet  of  heartless  and 
colourless  task- work;  genius,  rejoicing  in  congenial 
activity,  doing  easily  what  it  does  consummately  well, 


248  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

joins  the  patient  strength  of  the  horse  to  the  wings  of 
a  bird,  as  the  wise  Greeks  signified  by  their  fable  of 
Pegasus.  It  may  safely  be  said  that  all  art- work 
which  is  not,  in  this  sense,  quick  work,  is  not 
supremely  excellent.  The  novel  which  Charlotte 
Bronte  produced  under  these  circumstances  was 
published  in  the  autumn  of  1847,  and  before  the 
end  of  the  year  it  had  taken  its  place  as  one  of  the 
most  popular  novels  in  the  world.  To  this  day  it 
holds,  in  general  estimation  throughout  Europe  and 
America,  the  first  place  among  her  books.  It  was 
cast  in  the  unpromising  form  of  an  autobiography 
of  a  governess,  and  named  Jane  Eyre. 

The  earlier  chapters  are  a  model  of  those  preludings 
which,  interesting  themselves,  ought  always  to  prepare 
the  way  for,  and  to  yield  complete  precedence  to,  the 
main  interest  in  a  three-volume  novel.  The  heroine, 
introduced  to  us  in  early  girlhood,  is  realised  with 
decisive  and  errorless  touches,  few  but  sufficient.  She 
was  one  to  be  vehemently  liked  by  some,  to  be  un- 
affectedly detested  by  a  much  larger  number.  Abbot, 
Mrs.  Keed's  maid,  defined  her  as  "a  tiresome,  ill- 
conditioned  child,  who  always  looked  as  if  she  were 
watching  everybody,  and  scheming  plots  underhand." 
Yet  all  her  fault  was  that  she  was  thoughtful,  quiet, 
gentle,  deficient  in  animal  spirits,  and  plain  in  feature. 
She  could  be  interested  in  books,  and  loved  fairy  tales. 
She  had  looked  for  the  elves  "  among  foxglove  leaves 
and  bells,  under  mushrooms  and  beneath  the  ground- 
ivy  mantling  old  wall-nooks,"  and  had  at  length  owned 


Jane  and  the  Reed*.  249 

"the  sad  truth  that  they  were  all  gone  out  of  Eng- 
land." Such  a  little  creature  would  seem  to  vulgar 
worldlings,  like  Abbot  and  her  coarse,  red-faced 
mistress,  to  be  perpetually  asserting  a  claim  to 
spiritual  superiority,  and  would  be  hated  with  the 
perfect  hatred  wherewith  animals  of  all  species,  the 
human  emphatically  included,  regard  creatures  that 
are  strange,  and  alien,  and  perhaps  superior,  to 
themselves. 

Villanously  ill-treated  as  our  small  heroine  was  by 
the  red-faced  Keed  and  her  brute  son,  John,  the  author 
avoids  Dickens-ish  caricature  by  letting  us  see  how 
natural  it  was  for  such  persons  to  be  rude  and  cruel  to 
Jane.  "  I  was  a  discord,"  writes  the  latter,  com- 
menting on  the  experiences  of  her  childhood,  "  in 
Gateshead  Hall ;  I  was  like  nobody  there  ;  I  had 
nothing  in  harmony  with  Mrs.  Reed  or  her  children, 
or  her  chosen  vassalage.  If  they  did  not  love  me,  in 
fact,  as  little  did  I  love  them.  They  were  not  bound 
to  regard  with  affection  a  thing  that  could  not  sympa- 
thise with  one  amongst  them  ;  a  heterogeneous  thing, 
opposed  to  them  in  temperament,  in  capacity,  in  pro- 
pensities ;  a  useless  thing,  incapable  of  serving  their 
interest,  or  adding  to  their  pleasure  ;  a  noxious  thing, 
cherishing  the  germs  of  indignation  at  their  treatment, 
of  contempt  of  their  judgment.  I  know  that  had  I 
been  a  sanguine,  brilliant,  careless,  exacting,  hand- 
some, romping  child — though  equally  dependent  and 
friendless — Mrs.  Reed  would  have  endured  my  presence 
more  complacently."  And  again,  with  still  more  preg- 


250  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

nant  suggestiveness  : — "  Mrs.  Keed,  to  you  I  owe  some 
fearful  pangs  of  mental  suffering.  But  I  ought  to 
forgive  you,  for  you  knew  not  what  you  did :  while 
rending  my  heart-strings,  you  thought  you  were  only 
uprooting  my  bad  propensities." 

These  words  convey  a  most  valuable  hint  to  all 
engaged  in  the  up-bringing  of  the  young.  Mis- 
understandings are  easy  to  produce,  hard  to  destroy. 
I  was  once  in  boyhood  driven  almost  to  despair  by 
a  teacher,  an  able  man,  and  not  unduly  harsh,  who 
quite  misunderstood  me,  and  yet,  when  I  reflect  on 
the  whole  of  the  circumstances,  I  cannot  fix  upon 
any  point  in  which  he  was  culpable;  and  I  have 
seen  the  ablest  schoolmaster  under  whom  I  ever  sat — 
Dr.  Melvin,  of  Aberdeen — most  severely  reprimand,  in 
presence  of  the  whole  class,  a  boy  who  was  perfectly 
innocent  of  what  was  imputed  to  him.  "  Jane,  I 
don't  like  cavillers  or  questioners,"  said  Mrs.  Reed, 
when  the  little  girl  objected  to  be  wrongfully  accused. 
But  without  questioning,  nay,  ample  and  fine  cross- 
questioning,  the  truth  is  often  not  to  be  come  at ;  and 
of  this  it  is  generally  impossible  for  the  teacher,  com- 
pelled to  be  judge,  jury,  and,  in  most  cases,  sole 
witness  in  his  own  court,  to  have  the  advantage. 
Children,  besides,  and  even  boys  and  girls  well-grown, 
have  limited  powers  of  expression,  and  do  not  know 
how  to  enter  upon  an  explanation.  What  is  wanted  is 
precisely  what  cannot  be  had,  some  mutual  friend, 
with  gifts  of  reconciliation,  like  those  by  which,  as 
Macaulay  so  charmingly  describes,  Gilbert  Burnet 


Thornfield  Hall.  251 


removed  the  misunderstanding  that  alienated  William 
of  Orange  from  Mary. 

From  Gateshead  Hall  Jane  was  sent  to  Lowood 
School.  Enough,  and  not  more  than  enough,  is  told 
of  her  misfortunes  and  fortunes,  the  injustice  she  met 
with  from  Mr.  Brocklehurst,  and  the  justice  done  her 
by  Miss  Temple  ;  and  pathetic  and  beautiful  details 
are  given  of  her  friendship  with  Helen  Burns.  Thus 
prepared,  we  follow  her  with  stimulated  attention 
when,  having  plucked  up  resolution  to  advertise  for 
a  situation,  she  steps  out — a  highly  unprotected 
female,  aged  eighteen,  of  plain  face,  tiny  figure, 
strong  will,  good  head,  and  ver}7"  limited  experience 
— into  the  great  world.  The  situation  which  her 
advertisement  has  found  for  her  is  that  of  governess 
to  Adele  Varens,  the  ward  of  Edward  Fairfax  Ro- 
chester, Esq.,  of  Thornfield  Hall,  near  Millcote,  in 
a  nameless  county,  which  we  may  identify  as  York- 
shire. Thornfield  Hall  was  a  three-storied  house, 
with  picturesque  battlements  a-top ;  a  rather  vener- 
able mansion,  but  not  rising  to  the  dignity  of  a 
nobleman's  seat.  "Its  grey  front  stood  out  well 
from  the  background  of  a  rookery,  whose  cawing 
tenants  were  now  " — when  Jane  looked  at  them  on 
the  morning  after  her  arrival — "  on  the  wing.  They 
flew  over  the  lawn  and  grounds  to  alight  in  a  great 
meadow,  from  which  these  were  separated  by  a  sunk 
fence,  and  where  an  array  of  mighty  old  thorn  trees 
— strong,  knotty,  and  broad  as  oaks — at  once  ex- 
plained the  etymology  of  the  mansion's  designation. 


252  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

Farther  off  were  hills ;  not  so  lofty  as  those  round 
Lowood,  nor  so  craggy,  nor  so  like  barriers  of  sepa- 
ration from  the  living  world ;  but  yet  quiet  and  lonely 
hills  enough,  and  seeming  to  embrace  Thornfield  with 
a  seclusion  I  had  not  expected  to  find  existent  so  near 
the  stirring  locality  of  Millcote." 

There  is  one  point  in  the  interior  arrangements  of 
Thornfield  Hall,  as  described  by  Charlotte  Bronte, 
which,  though  unimportant  otherwise,  has  a  special 
interest  for  those  who  like  to  detect  in  literature  the 
signs  of  change  in  social  habitude  and  prevailing 
taste.  It  has  often  been  remarked,  and  the  remark 
seems  to  me  just,  that,  within  the  last  thirty  years, 
people  have  become  sadder.  Buskin  speaks  some- 
where of  the  growing  incapacity  among  us  to  be 
amused  by  poor  jests.  We  require  more  to  make 
us  laugh  than  the  mere  attempt  at  a  joke  which 
furnishes  pretext  enough  to  a  happy  schoolboy  for 
breaking  into  a  guffaw,  or  to  a  healthy  milkmaid 
for  showing  her  white  teeth.  Punch  does  not  make 
us  laugh  now  as  Punch  used  to  make  people  laugh  a 
quarter  of  a  century  ago.  Leech's  faces  were  always 
glad,  unless  marked  with  vexation  about  some  obvious 
disaster ;  Du  Maurier's  are  invariably  sad,  especially 
those  of  his  women,  except  when  they  are  vulgar  or 
ugly.  The  change  is  discernible  also  in  the  rooms 
we  inhabit.  Thirty  years  ago,  the  ideal  parlour  or 
drawing-room  of  the  middle-class  Englishman  was 
one  in  which  the  colours  were  harmoniously  bright. 
In  its  tones  of  colour  he  liked  it  to  approach,  as 


Furniture  Forty  Years  Ago.  253 

nearly  as  possible,  to  an  apple  blossom  painted  by 
old  William  Hunt.  Brightness  in  furniture  is  now 
thought  by  many  to  betray  vulgarity ;  it  is  almost 
as  bad  form  as  a  loud  laugh ;  the  olive  greens,  the 
sober  greys,  the  deep-toned  reds,  in  which  Mr. 
Morris  has  taught  us  to  find  a  melancholy  satis- 
faction, suggest,  however  beautiful  they  may  be,  a 
more  sombre  ideal  of  domestic  felicity.  It  is 
curiously  interesting,  in  connection  with  this  change 
of  feeling,  that  Emily  and  Charlotte  Bronte,  both  of 
them  what  one  would  call  grave  and  earnest  rather 
than  sprightly  women,  have  given  us  descriptions  of 
rooms,  evidently  intended  by  them  to  be  delightful, 
in  which  the  apple-blossom  ideal  is  realised,  and  that 
Charlotte,  when  her  taste  presided  over  the  furnishing 
of  a  room  in  Haworth  Kectory,  was  true  to  the  ideal 
presented  in  her  writings. 

When  Heathcliff  and  Cathy  look  through  the 
window  into  the  domestic  heaven  of  Thrushcross 
Grange,  what  they  see  is  thus  enthusiastically  de- 
scribed by  the  boy :  "  Ah !  it  was  beautiful — a 
splendid  place  carpeted  with  crimson,  and  crimson- 
covered  chairs  and  tables,  and  a  pure  white  ceiling 
bordered  by  gold,  a  shower  of  glass-drops  hanging 
in  silver  chains  from  the  centre,  and  shimmering 
with  little  soft  tapers."  When  Mrs.  Fairfax  permits 
Jane  Eyre  to  look  into  the  drawing-room  of  Thorn- 
field  Hall,  what  meets  her  delighted  gaze  is  thus 
described  by  the  governess:  "I  thought  I  caught 
a  glimpse  of  a  fairy  palace,  so  bright  to  my  novice 


254  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

eyes  appeared  the  view  beyond.  Yet  it  was  merely 
a  very  pretty  drawing-room,  and  within  it  a  boudoir* 
both  spread  with  white  carpets,  on  which  seemed  laid 
brilliant  garlands  of  flowers ;  both  ceiled  with  snowy 
mouldings  of  white  grapes  and  vine-leaves,  beneath 
which  glowed  in  rich  contrast  crimson  couches  and 
ottomans ;  while  the  ornaments  on  the  pale  Parian 
mantelpiece  were  of  sparkling  Bohemian  glass  ruby- 
red,  and  between  the  windows  large  mirrors  repeated 
the  general  blending  of  snow  and  fire."  "  The  par- 
lour," writes  a  visitor  to  Haworth  Parsonage  when 
Charlotte  was  its  mistress,  "has  been  evidently  re- 
furnished within  the  last  few  years,  since  Miss 
Bronte's  success  has  enabled  her  to  have  a  little 
more  money  to  spend.  The  prevailing  colour  of 
the  room  is  crimson," — harmoniously  blended,  we 
need  not  doubt,  though  this  deponent  saith  not, 
with  white  and  gold.  For  my  own  part,  though  I 
unaffectedly  enjoy  Mr.  Morris's  best  colours,  I  agree 
with  the  simple,  cheerful  people  of  the  early  Victorian 
era,  in  thinking  that  the  pleasantest  of  all  family 
sitting-rooms,  especially  in  the  country,  is  one  in 
which  the  tone  of  colour  is  a  delicate  harmony  of 
crimson,  white,  and  gold. 

We  shall  not  accompany  Jane  in  her  tour  of  dis- 
covery, with  Mrs.  Fairfax  for  guide,  from  room  to 
room  and  story  to  story,  in  Thornneld  Hall,  but 
the  description  of  the  landscape  which  she  saw  when 
she  emerged,  through  a  trap-door,  upon  the  roof,  is  too 
characteristic  of  Charlotte  Bronte  to  be  omitted : 


Grace  Poole.  255 


"  I  was  now  on  a  level  with  the  crow  colony,  and 
could  see  into  their  nests.  Leaning  over  the  battle- 
ments and  looking  far  down,  I  surveyed  the  grounds 
laid  out  like  a  map  :  the  bright  and  velvet  lawn  closely 
girdling  the  grey  base  of  the  mansion ;  the  field,  wide 
as  a  park,  dotted  with  its  ancient  timber ;  the  wood, 
dun  and  sere,  divided  by  a  path  visibly  overgrown, 
greener  with  moss  than  the  trees  were  with  foliage  ; 
the  church  at  the  gates,  the  road,  the  tranquil  hills, 
all  reposing  in  the  autumn  day's  sun ;  the  horizon 
bounded  by  a  propitious  sky,  azure,  marbled  with 
pearly  white.  No  feature  in  the  scene  was  extra- 
ordinary, but  all  was  pleasing." 

We  are  bound  also  to  take  note  of  the  first  intro- 
duction of  that  mystery  which  plays  so  important  a 
part  in  the  machinery  of  Jane  Eyre.  The  governess 
had  stepped  in  again,  after  looking  from  the  roof;  Mrs. 
Fairfax  stayed  behind  for  a  moment  to  fasten  the  trap- 
door ;  and  Jane  was  alone  in  the  passage  leading  from 
the  garret  staircase.  This  passage,  so  near  the  roof  of 
the  house,  was  "  narrow,  low,  and  dim,  with  only  one 
little  window  at  the  far  end,  and  looking,  with  its  two 
rows  of  small  black  doors  all  shut,  like  a  corridor,  in 
some  Bluebeard's  castle."  "  While  I  paced  softly  on," 
proceeds  Jane,  "  the  last  sound  I  expected  to  hear  in 
so  still  a  region,  a  laugh,  struck  my  ear.  It  was  a 
curious  laugh,  distinct,  formal,  mirthless.  I  stopped  ; 
the  sound  ceased,  only  for  an  instant ;  it  began  again, 
louder,  for  at  first,  though  distinct,  it  was  very  low. 
It  passed  off  in  a  clamorous  peal  that  seemed  to  wake 


256  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

an  echo  in  every  lonely  chamber,  though  it  originated 
but  in  one,  and  I  could  have  pointed  out  the  door 
whence  the  accents  issued.  *  Mrs.  Fairfax  !  '  I  called 
out,  for  I  now  heard  her  descending  the  great  stairs, 
'  did  you  hear  that  loud  laugh  ?  Who  is  it  ?  '  '  Some 
of  the  servants,  very  likely,'  she  answered ;  '  perhaps 
Grace  Poole.'  'Did  you  hear  it?' I  again  inquired. 
'  Yes,  plainly ;  I  often  hear  her ;  she  sews  in  one  of 
these  rooms.'  The  laugh  was  repeated  in  its  low, 
syllabic  tone,  and  terminated  in  an  odd  murmur. 
'  Grace ! '  exclaimed  Mrs.  Fairfax.  I  really  did  not 
expect  any  Grace  to  answer;  for  the  laugh  was  as 
tragic,  as  preternatural  a  laugh  as  any  I  ever  heard ; 
and,  but  that  it  was  high  noon,  and  that  no  circum- 
stance of  ghostliness  accompanied  the  curious  cachin- 
nation,  but  that  neither  scene  nor  season  favoured 
fear,  I  should  have  been  superstitiously  afraid.  How- 
ever, the  event  showed  me  I  was  a  fool  for  entertain- 
ing a  sense  even  of  surprise.  The  door  nearest  me 
opened,  and  a  servant  came  out, — a  woman  of  between 
thirty  and  forty  ;  a  set,  square-made  figure,  red-haired, 
and  with  a  hard,  plain  face:  any  apparition  less 
romantic  or  less  ghostly  could  scarcely  be  conceived. 
'  Too  much  noise,  Grace,'  said  Mrs.  Fairfax.  '  Ke- 
rnember  directions ! '  Grace  curtsied  silently  and 
went  in." 

It  is  only  in  the  sequel  that  we  appreciate  the  ad- 
mirable artfulness  of  this.  Grace  Poole,  the  contra- 
dictory creature  who  is  utterly  wooden  when  we  get  a 
full  sight  of  her,  and  becomes  so  mysteriously  and 


Grace  Poole.  257 


eerily  mirthful  whenever  the  door  in  the  long,  low, 
remote  passage  closes  behind  her,  is  a  singularly  in- 
genious invention. 

Jane,  too  active-minded  to  find  full  occupation  for 
her  faculties  with  her  one  pupil  and  Mrs.  Fairfax, 
frequently  walked  in  meditative  mood  in  the  weird 
corridor.  "When  thus  alone,"  she  says,  "I  not  un- 
frequently  heard  Grace  Poole's  laugh  :  the  same  peal, 
the  same  low,  slow  ha  !  ha  !  which,  when  first  heard, 
had  thrilled  me  :  I  heard,  too,  her  eccentric  murmurs, 
stranger  than  her  laugh.  Sometimes  I  saw  her  :  she 
would  come  out  of  her  room  with  a  basin,  or  a  plate, 
or  a  tray  in  her  hand,  go  down  to  the  kitchen  and 
shortly  return,  generally  (oh,  romantic  reader,  forgive 
me  for  telling  the  plain  truth !)  bearing  a  pot  of  porter." 
Was  ever  mystery  more  tantalising — more  provokingly 
unpoetical  ?  The  reader  must  recollect  that  Jane  was 
at  this  time  a  girl  of  eighteen,  who  had  lived  for  eight 
years  at  Lowood  school ;  had  she  possessed  more 
knowledge  of  the  world,  she  might  have  taken  a 
somewhat  different  view  of  the  enigma  connected 
with  Grace  Poole. 

In  spite,  however,  of  Adele's  vivacity,  Mrs.  Fairfax's 
judicious  observations,  and  Grace  Poole's  eccentric 
merriment,  Jane  had  begun  to  feel  existence  too  tran- 
quil at  Thornfield,  when  a  new  chapter  opened  in  her 
history  by  the  occurrence  of  an  event.  Winter  had 
succeeded  autumn,  and  the  ground  was  hard,  the  air 
keen,  with  January  frost.  Tired  of  sitting  in  the 
library,  Jane  offered  to  carry  a  letter  for  Mrs.  Fairfax 

17 


258  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

to  the  village  of  Hay,  two  miles  off.  The  bracing 
influence  of  the  sharp  Yorkshire  air  seems  to  be  upon 
us  as  we  read  the  description  of  her  walk. 

The  ground  was  hard,  the  air  was  still,  my  road  was  lonely.  I 
walked  fast  till  I  got  warm,  and  then  I  walked  slowly  to  enjoy  and 
analyse  the  species  of  pleasure  brooding  for  me  in  the  hour  and 
situation.  It  was  three  o'clock ;  the  church  bell  tolled  as  I  passed 
under  the  belfry:  the  charm  of  the  hour  lay  in  its  approaching 
dimness,  in  the  low-gliding  and  pale-beaming  sun.  I  was  a  mile 
from  Thornfield,  in  a  lane  noted  for  wild  roses  in  summer,  for  nuts 
and  blackberries  in  autumn,  and  even  now  possessing  a  few  coral 
treasures  in  hips  and  haws,  but  whose  best  winter  delight  lay  in  its 
utter  solitude  and  leafless  repose.  If  a  breath  of  air  stirred,  it  made 
no  sound  here;  for  there  was  not  a  holly,  not  an  evergreen  to 
rustle,  and  the  stripped  hawthorn  and  hazel  bushes  were  as  still  as 
the  white,  worn  stones  which  causewayed  the  middle  of  the  path. 
Far  and  wide,  on  each  side,  there  were  only  fields,  where  no  cattle 
now  browsed ;  and  the  little  brown  birds,  which  stirred  occasionally 
in  the  hedge,  looked  like  single  russet  leaves  that  had  forgotten  to 
drop. 

This  lane  inclined  up-hill  all  the  way  to  Hay :  having  reached 
the  middle,  I  sat  down  on  a  stile  which  led  thence  into  a  field. 
Gathering  my  mantle  about  me,  and  sheltering  my  hands  in  my 
muff,  I  did  not  feel  the  cold,  though  it  froze  keenly;  as  was 
attested  by  a  sheet  of  ice  covering  the  causeway,  where  a  little 
brooklet,  now  congealed,  had  overflowed  after  a  rapid  thaw  some 
days  since.  From  my  seat  I  could  look  down  on  Thornfield:  the 
grey  and  battlemented  hall  was  the  principal  object  in  the  vale 
below  me;  its  woods  and  dark  rookeiy  rose  against  the  west.  I 
lingered  till  the  sun  went  down  amongst  the  trees,  and  sank 
crimson  and  clear  behind  them.  I  then  turned  eastward. 

On  the  hill-top  above  me  sat  the  rising  moon;  pale  yet  as  a 
cloud,  but  brightening  momently:  she  looked  over  Hay,  which, 
half  lost  in  trees,  sent  up  a  blue  smoke  from  its  few  chimneys ;  it 
was  yet  a  mile  distant,  but  in  the  absolute  hush  I  could  hear 
plainly  its  thin  murmurs  of  life.  My  ear,  too,  felt  the  flow  of 
currents ;  in  what  dales  and  depths  I  could  not  tell :  but  there  were 
many  hills  beyond  Hay,  and  doubtless  many  becks  threading  their 
passes.  That  evening  calm  betrayed  alike  the  tinkle  of  the  nearest 
streams,  the  sough  of  the  most  remote. 


Winter  Evening.  259 


This  is  very  simple,  yet  quite  masterly,  writing.  It 
is  like  the  best  parts  of  Cowper's  Task  with  some- 
thing that  reminds  you  of  the  minute  elaboration  of 
Crabbe  or  John  Clare.  There  is  a  crispness  in  the 
touch  suggestive  of  frost,  when  frost  is  seasonable  and 
not  too  severe.  What  a  nice  precision  and  judicious 
parsimony  of  descriptive  features — none  of  the  too- 
much-ness,  the  too  florid  exuberance,  of  vulgar  word- 
painting  !  The  hedge  has  its  "  coral  treasures,"  in  hip 
and  haw,  though  the  rose  leaves  are  gone,  and  the 
little  brown  birds  are  among  the  branches, — "like 
single  russet  leaves  !  " — though  the  songs  of  summer 
are  hushed.  And  how  fine  and  deep  is  that  poetry  of 
the  hill  streams  !  "  My  ear  felt  the  flow  of  currents." 
The  poet-woman  was  with  the  becks  as  they  stole 
quietly  on,  humming  their  own  low,  sweet  moorland 
tune,  among  the  dales. 

The  frost  and  the  silence  having  brought  our  nerves 
into  exquisite  tension,  we  are  in  a  condition  to  be 
not  unpleasantly  startled  by  sound.  "  A  rude  noise 
broke  on  these  fine  ripplings  and  whisperings,  at  once 
so  far  away  and  so  clear ;  a  positive  tramp,  tramp ; 
a  metallic  clatter,  which  effaced  the  soft  wave- 
wanderings  ;  as,  in  a  picture,  the  solid  mass  of  a 
crag,  or  the  rough  boles  of  a  great  oak,  drawn  in 
dark  and  strong  on  the.  foreground,  efface  the  aerial 
distance  of  azure  hill,  sunny  horizon,  and  blended 
clouds,  where  tint  melts  into  tint." 

A  great  dog,  "  a  lion-like  creature  with  long  hair 
and  a  huge  head,"  went  careering  along;  a  horse  and 

17—2 


260  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

rider  passed;  and  Jane  took  a  few  steps  onward 
towards  Hay  :  but  a  noise  caused  her  to  look  back,  and 
she  saw  that  horse  and  man  were  down  on  the  ice  of 
the  causeway.  The  dog,  barking  loudly  as  dogs  will 
do  when  circumstances  suddenly  overtax  their  canine 
sagacity,  ran  instinctively  towards  Jane  as  if  to 
summon  her  assistance.  She  walked  back  to  the 
traveller,  who  was  extricating  himself  from  his 
hazardous  situation,  and  offered  help.  He  limped  to 
the  stile  on  which  she  had  been  seated  a  minute 
before,  and  she  had  time  to  survey  him.  "  His  figure 
was  enveloped  in  a  riding  cloak,  fur-collared,  and 
steel-clasped  ;  its  details  were  not  apparent,  but  1 
traced  the  general  points  of  middle  height,  and  con- 
siderable breadth  of  chest.  He  had  a  dark  face,  with 
stern  features  and  a  heavy  brow ;  his  eyes  and 
gathered  eyebrows  looked  ireful  and  thwarted  just 
now  ;  he  was  past  youth,  but  had  not  reached  middle 
age  ;  perhaps  he  might  be  thirty-five."  After  some 
little  colloquy,  he  accepted  Jane's  aid  to  the  extent  of 
leaning  on  her  shoulder,  as  he  halted  on  his  sprained 
foot  towards  his  horse ;  he  then  rode  off,  and  she  went 
on  her  way.  "  The  incident,"  she  writes,  "  had 
occurred,  and  was  gone  for  me ;  it  was  an  incident  of 
no  moment,  no  romance,  no  interest  in  a  sense ;  yet 
it  marked  with  change  one  single  hour  of  a  mono- 
tonous life.  My  help  had  been  needed  and  claimed ; 
I  had  given  it ;  I  was  pleased  to  have  done  something ; 
trivial,  transitory  though  the  deed  was,  it  was  yet  an 
active  thing,  and  I  was  weary  of  an  existence  all 


Jane  meets  Rochester.  261 

passive.  The  new  face,  too,  was  like  a  new  picture 
introduced  to  the  gallery  of  memory ;  and  it  was 
dissimilar  to  all  the  others  hanging  there  :  firstly, 
because  it  was  masculine ;  and,  secondly,  because  it 
was  dark,  strong,  and  stern."  On  returning  to 
Thornfield  Hall,  she  found  that  the  rider  was  her 
employer,  Mr.  Rochester. 


CHAPTEK  IX. 

JANE  AND  ROCHESTER— JANE'S  PICTUEES— 
CHAELOTTE  BEONTE'S  IMAGINATION— TEE 
MERMAID— THE  NEEEIDES—EOCHESTEE  'S 
SELF-DESCEIPTION—  THE  MYSTEEY—  EO- 
CHESTEE'S  PLEA. 

FEW  characters,  if  any,  in  modern  fiction,  have  been 
so  much  discussed  as  that  of  the  hero  of  Jane  Eyre. 
My  own  estimate  of  Edward  Fairfax  Rochester  has 
long  heen  formed,  but  it  will  be  more  satisfactory  to 
my  readers  that  the  facts  on  which  a  just  estimate 
must  be  based  should  be  fairly  set  before  them  than  that 
I  should  begin  with  a  statement  of  my  own  opinion. 

On  the  evening  of  the  day  after  his  arrival  at 
Thornfield,  Kochester  conversed  at  some  length  with 
Jane.  We  shall  take  a  few  words  from  their  colloquy. 
"  *  You  have  been  resident  in  my  house  three 

months?'      *  Yes,  sir.'      'And  you  came  from ?' 

'  From  Lowood  school  in  shire/  '  Ah !  a  charit- 
able concern.  How  long  were  you  there  ? '  '  Eight 
years.'  '  Eight  years  !  you  must  be  tenacious  of  life. 
I  thought  half  the  time  in  such  a  place  would  have 
done  up  any  constitution !  No  wonder  you  have 
rather  the  look  of  another  world.  I  marvelled  where 


Jane  and  Rochester.  263 

you  had  got  that  sort  of  face.  When  you  ca/me  on  me 
in  Hay  Lane  last  night,  I  thought  unaccountably  of 
fairy  tales,  and  had  half  a  mind  to  demand  whether 
you  had  bewitched  my  horse  :  I  am  not  sure  yet. 
Who  are  your  parents ? '  'I  have  none.'  '  Nor  ever 
had,  I  suppose ;  do  you  remember  them? '  *  No.'  " 

I  put  into  italics  that  remark  of  Eochester's  which 
must,  I  think,  have  grated  on  the  ear,  or  rather  on 
the  heart,  of  the  reader.  It  is  entirely  decisive  as  to 
the  fact  that  Kochester  had  not  the  intuitions  of  a 
gentleman.  "A  charitable  concern!  "  he  says.  The 
girl  had  just  told  him  she  had  been  trained  in  it. 
Noah  Claypole  called  Oliver  Twist  "  Vurkus." 
Eochester  did  not,  like  Claypole,  wish  to  wound  the 
person  he  addressed  ;  but  if  he  had  not  been  charac- 
terised by  that  defect  of  sensibility  which  Euskin 
rightly  pronounces  the  infallible  note  of  vulgarity,  he 
would  instinctively  and  instantaneously  have  placed 
his  recollection  of  the  nature  of  the  Lowood  founda- 
tion under  the  strictest  guard  of  silence,  and  hastened 
on  without  letting  Jane  detect,  even  by  a  glance  of  his 
eye,  what  he  had  been  thinking  of.  There  was  a  lack 
of  delicacy  in  the  blunt  cross-questioning  about  Jane's 
parentage,  but  this  was  a  venial  offence  compared 
with  the  other.  In  his  second  conversation  with  Jane, 
Eochester  took  occasion,  apropos  of  his  disliking  the 
prattle  of  children,  to  inform  her  that  he  was  an  "  old 
bachelor."  The  sequel  proves  that  this  was  a  lie, — 
not  a  quite  unqualified  lie,  but  a  statement  which,  in 
any  court  of  justice,  would  be  characterised  as  the  real 


264  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

thing.  Kather  unmanageable  items  these,  to  reconcile 
with  the  character  of  a  hero, — a  piece  of  rudeness  of 
which  no  one  could  be  guilty  who  had  the  sympathetic 
nerve  of  a  gentleman,  and  a  fib  ! 

We  shall  return  to  the  character  of  Eochester,  but 
I  must  here  make  him  stand  aside  for  a  moment,  in 
order  that  the  attention  of  the  reader  may  be  given  to 
a  passage,  occurring  in  connection  with  one  of  these 
early  conversations  between  Jane  and  her  master, 
which  is  specially  illustrative  of  Charlotte  Bronte's 
imaginative  genius.  I  refer  to  the  description  of  three 
of  Jane's  water-colour  pictures,  as  they  were  placed 
before  the  critical  eye  of  Eochester. 

The  first  represented  clouds  low  and  livid,  rolling  over  a  swollen 
sea  ;  all  the  distance  was  in  eclipse  ;  so,  too,  was  the  foreground ; 
or,  rather,  the  nearest  billows,  for  there  was  no  land.  One  gleam 
of  light  lifted  into  relief  a  half -submerged  mast,  on  which  sat  a 
cormorant,  dark  and  large,  with  wings  flecked  with  foam  :  its  beak 
held  a  gold  bracelet,  set  with  gems,  that  I  had  touched  with  as 
brilliant  tints  as  my  palette  could  yield,  and  as  glittering  dis- 
tinctness as  my  pencil  could  impart.  Sinking  below  the  bird  and 
mast,  a  drowned  corpse  glanced  through  the  green  water ;  a  fair 
arm  was  the  only  limb  clearly  visible,  whence  the  bracelet  had 
been  washed  or  torn. 

The  second  picture  contained  for  foreground  only  the  dim  peak 
of  a  hill,  with  grass  and  some  leaves  slanting  as  if  by  a  breeze. 
Beyond  and  above  spread  an  expanse  of  sky,  dark  blue  as  at 
twilight ;  rising  into  the  sky  was  a  woman's  shape  to  the  bust, 
portrayed  in  tints  as  dusk  and  soft  as  I  could  combine.  The  dim 
forehead  was  crowned  with  a  star ;  the  lineaments  below  were 
seen  as  through  the  suffusion  of  vapour ;  the  eyes  shone  dark  and 
wild ;  the  hair  streamed  shadowy,  like  a  beamless  cloud  torn  by 
storm  or  by  electric  travail.  On  the  neck  lay  a  pale  reflection  like 
moonlight ;  the  same  faint  lustre  touched  the  train  of  thin  clouds 
from  which  rose  and  bowed  this  vision  of  the  Evening  Star. 


Jane's  Pictures.  265 


The  third  showed  the  pinnacle  of  an  iceberg  piercing  a  polar 
winter  sky  :  a  muster  of  northern  lights  reared  their  dim  lances, 
close  serried,  along  the  horizon.  Throwing  these  into  distance, 
rose,  in  the  foreground,  a  head — a  colossal  head,  inclined  towards 
the  iceberg,  and  resting  against  it.  Two  thin  hands,  joined  under 
the  forehead,  and  supporting  it,  drew  up  before  the  lower  features 
a  sable  veil ;  a  brow  quite  bloodless,  white  as  bone,  and  an  eye 
hollow  and  fixed,  blank  of  meaning  but  for  the  glassiness  of 
despair,  alone  were  visible.  Above  the  temples,  amidst  wreathed 
turban  folds  of  black  drapery,  vague  in  its  character  and  consis- 
tency as  cloud,  gleamed  a  ring  of  white  flame,  gemmed  with 
sparkles  of  a  more  lurid  tinge.  This  pale  crescent  was  '  The 
likeness  of  a  Kingly  Crown ; '  what  it  diademed  was  '  the  shape 
which  shape  had  none.'  " 

Chapters — books,  I  daresay — have  been  written  to  dis- 
cuss and  define  the  nature^of  imagination ;  but  the  main 
and  central  application  of  the  term  is  that  which  rests 
upon  the  idea  of  eyesight.  Imagination  is  the  soul's 
eye.  In  its  highest  power,  however,  it  is  creative  in  a 
sense  in  which  the  bodily  eye,  except  for  diseased 
persons  or  fantastic  philosophers,  never  is.  The  vision 
of  the  external  world  rolls  into  the  bodily  eye,  un- 
bidden ;  not  at  all  created,  and  very  slightly  modified, 
by  the  eye  that  sees ;  but  the  imagination,  working, 
indeed,  with  materials  furnished  in  their  originals  by 
perception,  bodies  out  visions  which  have  no  counter- 
part in  the  external  world.  These  are  produced  by  the 
poet  and  the  artist,  and  demand  a  higher  form  of 
mental  operation  than  any  that  is  engaged  in  by  the  man 
of  science.  The  imaginative  power  displayed  in  in  vent- 
ing and  describing  Jane's  pictures  gives  Charlotte  Bronte 
a  better  title  to  the  name  of  poet  than  anything  in  her 
verses.  The  passage  seems  to  me  to  transcend  anything 


266  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

that  has  been  done,  either  in  verse  or  prose,  by  George 
Eliot.  Only  Mrs.  Browning,  among  Englishwomen  of 
literary  genius,  has  surpassed  these  word-paintings. 

Perhaps  still  finer  illustration  of  the  power  in 
question  than  is  afforded  by  the  three  pictures  which 
Jane  Eyre  placed  before  Kochester,  may  be  found  in 
some  passages  occurring  in  Shirley.  They  are  brief, 
and  admit  of  being  easily  separated  from  the  context. 
It  will  be  unnecessary  to  quote  more  than  two. 
The  first  appears  in  a  conversation  between  Shirley 
Keeldar,  the  heroine  of  the  novel,  and  her  friend 
Caroline  Heist  one,  on  the  subject  of  a  voyage  which 
they  propose  taking  to  the  Arctic  regions. 

"I  suppose  you  expect  to  see  mermaids,  Shirley?"  "One  of 
them  at  any  rate.  I  do  not  bargain  for  less ;  and  she  is  to  appear 
in  some  such  fashion  as  this.  I  am  to  be  walking  by  myself  on 
deck,  rather  late  of  an  August  evening,  watching  and  being 
watched  by  a  full  harvest-moon ;  something  is  to  rise  white  on  the 
surface  of  the  sea,  over  which  that  moon  mounts  silent,  and  hangs 
glorious.  The  object  glitters  and  sinks.  It  rises  again.  I  think  I 
hear  it  cry  with  an  articulate  voice :  I  call  you  up  from  the  cabin : 
I  show  you  an  image,  fair  as  alabaster,  emerging  from  the  dim 
wave.  We  both  see  the  long  hair,  the  lifted  and  foam-white  arm, 
the  oval  mirror  brilliant  as  a  star.  It  glides  nearer ;  a  human  face 
is  plainly  visible;  a  face  in  the  style  of  yours,  whose  straight, 
pure  (excuse  the  word,  it  is  appropriate) — whose  straight,  pure 
lineaments  paleness  does  not  disfigure.  It  looks  at  us,  but  not 
with  your  eyes.  I  see  a  preternatural  lure  in  its  wily  glance :  it 
beckons.  Were  we  men  we  should  spring  at  the  sign,  the  cold 
billow  would  be  dared  for  the  sake  of  the  colder  enchantress  • 
being  women,  we  stand  safe,  though  not  dreadless.  She  compre- 
hends our  unmoved  gaze  ;  she  feels  herself  powerless  ;  anger 
crosses  her  front;  she  cannot  charm,  but  she  will  appal  us;  she 
rises  high,  and  glides  all  revealed,  on  the  dark  wave-ridge. 
Temptress-terror !  monstrous  likeness  of  ourselves !  Are  you  not 
glad,  Caroline,  when  at  last,  and  with  a  wild  shriek,  she]]dives  ?  " 


Charlotte  Bronte's  Imagination.  267 

The  other  passage  is  suggested  by  the  contraband 
reading  of  the  schoolboy,  Martin  Yorke,  who  likes 
better  to  con  fairy  tales  when  the  lingering  light  of 
sunset  blends  with  the  first  beams  of  the  moon,  than 
to  explore  the  mysteries  of  Latin  grammar.  The  few 
lines  descriptive  of  the  vision  of  the  fairy  queen  are 
unimportant,  but  we  may  as  well  take  them  for  what 
Charlotte  Bronte  doubtless  intended  them  to  be,  a 
kind  of  introduction  to  the  more  original  bit  of 
imaginative  work  that  succeeds. 

He  reads :  he  is  led  into  a  solitary  mountain  region ;  all  round 
him  is  rude  and  desolate,  shapeless,  and  almost  colourless.  He 
hears  bells  tinkle  on  the  wind ;  forth-riding  from  the  formless 
forms  of  the  mist,  dawns  on  him  the  brightest  vision — a  green- 
robed  lady,  on  a  snow-white  palfrey ;  he  sees  her  dress,  her  gems> 
and  her  steed ;  she  arrests  him  with  some  mysterious  question ;  he 
is  spell-bound,  and  must  follow  her  into  Fairyland. 

A  second  legend  bears  him  to  the  sea-shore ;  there  tumbles  in  a 
strong  tide,  boiling  at  the  base  of  dizzy  cliffs ;  it  rains  and  blows. 
A  reef  of  rocks,  black  and  rough,  stretches  far  into  the  sea;  all 
along,  and  among,  and  above  these  crags,  dash  and  flash,  sweep 
and  leap,  swells,  wreaths,  drifts  of  snowy  spray.  Some  lone 
wanderer  is  out  on  these  rocks,  treading,  with  cautious  step,  the 
wet,  wild  sea-weed;  glancing  down  into  hollows  where  the  brine 
lies  fathom-deep  and  emerald-clear,  and  seeing  there  wilder,  and 
stranger,  and  huger  vegetation  than  is  found  on  land,  with  treasure 
of  shells — some  green,  some  purple,  some  pearly — clustered  in  the 
curls  of  the  snaky  plants.  He  hears  a  cry.  Looking  up,  and 
forward,  he  sees,  at  the  bleak  point  of  the  reef,  a  tall,  pale  thing — 
shaped  like  man,  but  made  of  spray — transparent,  tremulous, 
awful :  it  stands  not  alone  ;  they  are  all  human  figures  that  wanton 
in  the  rocks — a  crowd  of  foam-women — a  band  of  white,  evanes- 
cent Nereides. 

That  Mermaid  is,  so  far  as  I  know,  an  entirely 
original  conception.  Despite  the  presence  of  the 
mirror,  she  is  not  in  the  least  like  the  lady  of 


268  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

marine  tradition  who  combs  her  locks  with  a  golden 
comb,  as  Heine  makes  his  witch  of  the  Loreley  do  ; 
nor  has  she  any  resemblance  to  the  Sirens  of  the  old 
Sicilian  shore.  She  is  born  of  the  imagination 
of  Charlotte  Bronte,  and  is  invested  with  a  new 
and  strange  mystery  as  a  temptress  of  women  ;  not 
impassioned,  but  wily  and  cold,  incarnating  the 
treachery,  and  the  wild  gleaming  perilous  beauty, 
and  the  cruel  power,  of  the  Northern  sea.  How 
finely  in  keeping  is  it  that  such  a  creature  should 
appear  when  the  pale  moon  is  rising  into  the  steely 
sky,  and  the  cold  glitter  of  its  beam  lends  a  more 
witching  whiteness  to  arm  and  bosom  as  she  "glares 
appalling  from  the  ridge  of  the  wave!  " 

The  description,  in  the  second  passage,  of  the 
broken  sea  on  a  craggy  shore  beneath  high  cliffs, 
with  interposed  hollows,  rock-protected,  where  the 
salt  water  lies  in  crystalline  clearness,  shows  how 
carefully  Charlotte  Bronte  had  noted  the  scenery  of 
the  English  seashore  on  her  visits  to  Scarborough 
and  Filey ;  but  in  the  personification  of  the  filmy 
foam-wreaths,  wavering  in  the  wind,  as  evanescent 
Nereides,  there  is  a  far  more  subtle  and  plastic 
power  than  that  of  mere  observation,  a  power  essen- 
tially identical  with  that  of  the  poet  and  the  creative 
artist.  And  while  the  imagination,  in  its  plastic, 
form-giving  energy,  calls  into  visible  shape  the  Mer- 
maid or  the  Nereid,  the  imagination,  in  its  reveal- 
ing, penetrating,  and  sympathetic  energy,  enables  us 
to  realise  how,  in  a  distant  age,  the  legend  of  the 


Rochester.  269 


Mermaid  or  the  Nereid  arose.  Charlotte  Bronte, 
with  her  quick  eye  and  kindling  sympathy,  as  she 
looked  at  the  wind-shaken  foam  beneath  Yorkshire 
cliffs,  felt  as  the  early  Greek  felt  when  he  first  saw, 
in  the  wavering  spray  of  the  .ZEgean,  the  white 
draperies  of  the  daughters  of  Nereus.  Thus  treated, 
old  legends  are  never  dead ;  the  fossil  tradition  is 
re-inspired  with  life,  and  we  know  how  our  remote 
ancestors  first  learned  to  believe  in  it.  And  now  let 
us  return  to  Edward  Fairfax  Rochester. 

He  was,  we  found,  an  imperfect  character,  his  im- 
perfection including  a  vulgar  callousness  of  feeling 
and  a  disregard  of  truth.  The  author,  however,  is 
careful  to  inform  us  that  his  imperfection  was  not 
without  excuse.  He  had  suffered  wrong.  His  elder 
brother  had  prejudiced  his  father  against  him.  His 
father,  anxious  that  he  should  be  rich ,  had  co-operated 
with  his  brother  in  placing  him  in  "  what  he  con- 
sidered a  painful  position,  for  the  sake  of  making 
his  fortune."  The  nature  of  the  injury  is  not,  at 
this  stage,  disclosed  ;  but  "  his  spirit  could  not 
brook  what  he  had  to  suffer."  His  misfortune  had 
caused  him  to  lead  "  an  unsettled  kind  of  life,"  and 
since  the  death  of  his  brother,  when  he  became 
master  of  Thornfield,  he  had  hardly  stayed  at  the 
place  for  a  fortnight  together.  In  his  wanderings 
he  had  acquired  the  habit  of  brooding  on  his  sorrows, 
and  his  conversation  with  Jane  was  strongly  tinged 
with  egotism.  "  '  Criticise  me,'  he  said  to  her  once  ; 
*  does  my  forehead  not  please  you  ? '  He  lifted  up  the 


270  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

sable  waves  of  hair  which  lay  horizontally  over  his 
brow,  and  showed  a  solid  enough  mass  of  intellectual 
organs,  but  an  abrupt  deficiency  where  the  suave  sign 
of  benevolence  should  have  risen.  '  Now,  ma'am,  am 
I  a  fool  ?  '  '  Far  from  it,  sir.  You  would,  perhaps, 
think  me  rude  if  I  inquired  in  return  whether  you  are 
a  philanthropist?' '  No,  he  is  not  a  "general  philan- 
thropist." He  does  not  like  children  or  old  women ; 
but  "I  bear,"  he  says,  "a  conscience,"  and  "I  once 
had  a  kind  of  rude  tenderness  of  heart." 

This  looks  much  like  the  kind  of  man  who,  by  the 
lords  of  creation,  wherever  they  do  congregate — in 
college  hall,  or  club  dining-room — is  unanimously 
voted  a  bore  and  prig.  There  is  a  fine  stagy  sad- 
ness about  him,  and  he  looks  not  ill.  "  He  rose  from 
his  chair,  and  stood,  leaning  his  arm  on  the  marble 
mantelpiece.  In  that  attitude  his  shape  was  seen 
plainly,  as  well  as  his  face  ;  his  unusual  breadth  of  chest 
disproportionate  almost  to  his  length  of  limb.  I  am 
sure  most  people  would  have  thought  him  an  ugly  man ; 
yet  there  was  so  much  unconscious  pride  in  his  port, 
so  much  ease  in  his  demeanour,  such  a  look  of  com- 
plete indifference  to  his  own  external  appearance,  so 
haughty  a  reliance  on  the  power  of  other  qualities, 
intrinsic  or  adventitious,  to  atone  for  the  lack  of  mere 
personal  attractiveness,  that,  in  looking  at  him,  one 
inevitably  shared  the  indifference,  and,  even  in  a 
blind,  imperfect  •  sense,  put  faith  in  the  confidence." 

If  men  would  call  this  a  strutting  coxcomb,  there 
are  few  women  who  would  not  be  touched  by  his 


Rochester  Describes  Himself.  271 

melancholy  charm.  The  reader  has  probably  been 
already  reminded  of  the  Byronic  hero — the  Giaour, 
the  Corsair,  the  Childe,  Lara,  Manfred — who  awoke 
such  a  furore  of  sympathetic  admiration  two  or  three 
generations  back.  Byron,  at  bottom  one  of  the 
shrewdest  men  of  the  world,  appreciated  the  theatri- 
cality of  his  own  stock  character,  and  laughed  ironi- 
cally when  a  young  American  hero-worshipper, 
Coolidge  by  name,  betrayed  symptoms  of  disappoint- 
ment at  not  finding  his  lordship  attired  in  wolfskin 
breeches  and  answering  in  fierce  monosyllables,  on  the 
model  of  his  typical  hero.  When  Moore,  however, 
sketched  the  character  in  its  generic  traits,  Byron  did 
not  half  like  his  friend's  wit. 

The  sallow,  sublime,  kind  of  Werter-faced  man, 
With  moustachios  that  gave,  what  we  read  of  so  oft, 
The  dear  Corsair-expression,  half-savage,  half  soft. 

Rochester,  proceeding  with  his  autobiographical 
confidences  to  Jane,  informs  her  that  he  is  not  a 
villain,  but  "  a  trite,  common-place  sinner,  hackneyed 
in  all  the  poor,  petty  dissipations  with  which  the  rich 
and  worthless  try  to  put  on  life."  He  detects  in  her, 
he  says,  a  capacity  of  listening  to  him,  not  with  male- 
volent scorn,  but  with  "innate  sympathy,"  and  he 
opens  his  heart  to  her  in  return.  "  '  You  would  say, 
I  should  have  been  superior  to  circumstances ;  so  I 
should ;  but  you  see  I  was  not.  When  fate  wronged 
me,  I  had  not  the  wisdom  to  remain  cool.  I  turned 
desperate  ;  then  I  degenerated.  .  .  .  Dread 
remorse  when  you  are  tempted  to  err,  Miss  Eyre. 
Remorse  is  the  poison  of  life.' '  She  suggests  that 


272  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

repentance  is  its  cure ;  but  he  will  not  listen  to  so 
commonplace  a  prescription.  He  has  one  of  his  own. 
A  notion,  he  says,  has  flitted  across  his  brain.  "'I 
believe  it  was  an  inspiration  rather  than  a  temptation : 
it  was  very  genial,  very  soothing — I  know  that.  Here 
it  comes  again.  It  is  no  devil,  I  assure  you ;  or,  if  it 
be,  it  has  put  on  the  robes  of  an  angel  of  light.  I 
think  I  must  admit  so  fair  a  guest  when  it  asks 
entrance  to  my  heart.' '  Jane  warns  him  that  it  may 
be  an  angel  of  darkness,  but  he  refuses  to  believe  her. 
"  '  Not  at  all, '  he  exclaims  ;  '  it  bears  the  most 
gracious  message  in  the  world :  for  the  rest,  you  are 
not  my  conscience-keeper,  so  don't  make  yourself  un- 
easy. Here,  come  in,  bonny  wanderer  ! '  He  said  this 
as  if  he  spoke  to  a  vision,  viewless  to  any  eye  but  his 
own;  then,  folding  his  arms,  which  he  had  half 
extended,  on  his  chest,  he  seemed  to  enclose  in  their 
embrace  the  invisible  being.  '  Now,'  he  continued, 
again  addressing  me,  '  I  have  received  the  pilgrim — a 
disguised  deity,  as  I  verily  believe.  Already  it  has 
done  me  good :  my  heart  was  a  sort  of  charnel ;  it  will 
now  be  a  shrine.'  " 

The  whisper  of  hope  and  healing  from  heaven,  or 
the  muttered  temptation  from  hell— for  it  is  not  on 
the  surface  discernible  which  of  these  it  may  be — 
which  [Rochester  expected  to  turn  his  heart  from  a 
charnel  into  a  shrine,  was,  in  more  prosaic  language, 
the  suggestion  that  he  should  marry  Jane.  What 
stands  in  the  way  he  will  not  tell  her ;  but  readers 
doubtless  suspect  that  it  is  something  connected  with 


The  Mystery.  273 


Grace  Poole.  A  succession  of  incidents,  devised  and 
described  with  an  ingenuity,  a  felicity,  an  intensity, 
unsurpassed  in  the  whole  range  of  fictitious  literature, 
perplexes  us  with  a  sense  of  the  mystery.  One  night 
Jane,  startled  from  sleep,  hears  close  to  her  room  door 
the  laugh  which  had  surprised  her  in  the  corridor, 
finds  presently  that  the  curtains  and  bed-clothes  of 
Kochester's  bed  had  been  set  on  fire,  and  barely 
succeeds  in  extinguishing  the  flames  and  saving  his 
life.  He  refers  her  to  Grace  Poole  as  the  source  of 
the  mischief.  On  another  nighfc  the  silence  is  rent  by 
a  terrific  shriek ;  a  visitor  sleeping  on  the  same  story 
with  Grace  Poole  has  been  murderously  attacked ;  and 
Jane  holds  the  basin  while  Rochester  sponges  away 
the  blood  and  restores  the  rescued  victim  to  conscious- 
ness. This  operation  is  performed  in  a  room  into 
which  another  room  opens,  and  from  this  inner  room 
Jane  hears  "  a  snarling,  snatching  sound,  almost  like 
a  dog  quarrelling."  It  need  scarcely  be  said  that  she 
was  perplexed.  "  What  crime,"  she  speculated,  "was 
this,  that  lived  incarnate  in  this  sequestered  mansion, 
and  could  neither  be  expelled  nor  subdued  by  the 
owner  ?  What  mystery  that  broke  out,  now  in  fire 
and  now  in  blood,  at  the  deadest  hour  of  night? 
What  creature  was  it,  that,  masked  in  an  ordinary 
woman's  face  and  shape,  uttered  the  voice,  now  of  a 
mocking  demon,  and  anon  of  a  carrion-seeking  bird  of 
prey?"  Once  more — this  time,  also,  in  the  dead  of 
night — Jane  Eyre  was  awakened  by  the  presence  of 
the  mystery.  In  the  description  of  what  followed, 

18 


274  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

taken  in  connection  with  the  subsequent  explanation 
of  it,  Charlotte  Bronte  has  succeeded  in  creating  the 
emotion  of  terror  as  effectually  as  Edgar  Poe  ever  did 
in  those  weird  and  awful  tales  in  which  he  concen- 
trated the  whole  force  of  his  genius  upon  the  produc- 
tion of  that  particular  emotion.  Jane  details  the 
circumstances  to  Rochester,  most  imaginatively  lead- 
ing up  to  the  climax  of  horror  by  an  account  of  the 
troubled  dreams  which  had  been  previously  vexing 
her  sleep.  I  include  in  my  quotation  the  closing 
sentences  of  this  "  preface." 

"  I  heard  the  gallop  of  a  horse  at  a  distance  on  the  road ;  I  was 
sure  it  was  you  ;  and  you  were  departing  for  many  years,  and  for 
a  distant  country.  I  climbed  the  thin  wall  with  frantic,  perilous 
haste,  eager  to  catch  one  glimpse  of  you  from  the  top  ;  the  stones 
rolled  from  under  my  feet,  the  ivy  branches  I  grasped  gave  way, 
the  child  clung  round  my  neck  in  terror,  and  almost  strangled  me  ; 
at  last  I  gained  the  summit.  I  saw  you  like  a  speck  on  a  white 
track,  lessening  every  moment.  The  blast  blew  so  strong,  I  could 
not  stand.  I  sat  down  on  the  narrow  ledge  ;  I  hushed  the  scared 
infant  in  my  lap  ;  you  turned  an  angle  of  the  road ;  I  bent  forward 
to  take  a  last  look  ;  the  wall  crumbled ;  I  was  shaken  ;  the  child 
rolled  from  my  knee,  I  lost  my  balance,  fell,  and  woke." 

"  Now,  Jane,  that  is  all."  "  All  the  preface,  sir  ;  the  tale  is  yet 
to  come.  On  waking,  a  gleam  dazzled  my  eyes  ;  I  thought — oh, 
it  is  daylight !  But  I  was  mistaken ;  it  was  only  candle-light ; 
Sophie,  I  supposed,  had  come  in.  There  was  a  light  on  the 
dressing-table,  and  the  door  of  the  closet,  where,  before  going  to 
bed,  I  had  hung  my  wedding  dress  and  veil,  stood  open  ;  I  heard  a 
rustling  there.  I  asked,  '  Sophie,  what  are  you  doing  ?  '  No  one 
answered ;  but  a  form  emerged  from  the  closet ;  it  took  the  light, 
held  it  aloft,  and  surveyed  the  garments  pendent  from  the  port- 
manteau.* '  Sophie  !  Sophie  !  '  I  again  cried,  and  still  it  was  silent. 
I  had  risen  up  in  bed,  I  bent  forwards  :  first,  surprise,  then 

*  I  quote  from  the  illustrated  edition  of  1875.  It  is  not  easy  to 
see  how  garments  could  be  pendent  from  a  portmanteau. 


The  Mystery.  275 


bewilderment,  came  over  me,  and  then  my  blood  crept  cold 
through  my  veins.  Mr.  Rochester,  this  was  not  Sophie,  it  was 
not  Leah,  it  was  not  Mrs.  Fairfax  ;  it  was  not — no,  I  was  sure  of 
it,  and  am  still — it  was  not  even  that  strange  woman,  Grace 
Poole."  "It  must  have  been  one  of  them,"  interrupted  my 
master.  "  No,  sir,  I  solemnly  assure  you  to  the  contrary.  The 
shape  standing  before  me  had  never  crossed  nay  eyes  within  the 
precincts  of  Thornfield  Hall  before ;  the  height,  the  contour,  were 
new  to  me."  "Describe  it,  Jane."  "It  seemed,  sir,  a  woman, 
tall  and  large,  with  thick  and  dark  hair  hanging  long  down  her 
back.  I  know  not  what  dress  she  had  on  :  it  was  white  and 
straight ;  but  whether  gown,  sheet,  or  shroud,  I  cannot  tell." 
"  Did  you  see  her  face  ?  "  "  Not  at  first.  But  presently  she  took 
my  veil  from  its  place ;  she  held  it  up,  gazed  at  it  long,  and  then 
she  threw  it  over  her  own  head,  and  turned  to  the  mirror.  At  that 
moment  I  saw  the  reflection  of  the  visage  and  features  quite 
distinctly  in  the  dark  oblong  glass."  _  "  And  how  were  they  ?  " 
"  Fearful  and  ghastly  to  me — oh,  sir,  I  never  saw  a  face  like  it. 
It  was  a  discoloured  face — it  was  a  savage  face.  I  wish  I  could 
forget  the  roll  of  the  red  eyes  and  the  fearful  blackened  inflation  of 
the  lineaments."  "  Ghosts  are  usually  pale,  Jane."  "  This,  sir, 
was  purple  ;  the  lips  were  swelled  and  dark  ;  the  brow  furrowed  ; 
the  black  eyebrows  widely  raised  over  the  bloodshot  eyes  !  Shall 
I  tell  you  of  what  it  reminded  me  ?  "  "  You  may."  "  Of  the  foul 
German  spectre — the  Vampire."  "Ah!  What  did  it  do?" 
"  Sir,  it  removed  my  veil  from  its  gaunt  head,  rent  it  in  two  parts, 
and  flinging  both  on  the  floor,  trampled  on  them."  "  After- 
wards ?  "  "It  drew  aside  the  window- curtain  and  looked  out ; 
perhaps  it  saw  dawn  approaching,  for,  taking  the  candle,  it 
retreated  to  the  door.  Just  at  my  bedside  the  figure  stopped  ;  the 
fiery  eye  glared  upon  me — she  thrust  up  her  candle  close  to  my 
face,  and  extinguished  it  under  my  eyes.  I  was  aware  her  lurid 
visage  flamed  over  mine,  and  I  lost  consciousness  :  for  the  second 
time  in  my  life — only  the  second  time — I  became  insensible  from 
terror." 

The  peculiar  and  penetrating  horror  of  this  appa- 
rition is  derived  from  the  subsequent  discovery  that  it 
was  no  ghost  that  appeared  to  Jane,  but  a  fierce 
and  dangerous  maniac.  The  spectral  woman  was,  of 

18—2 


276  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

course,  Eochester's  wife,  and  he  led  Jane  to  the  altar 
without  correcting  his  early  statement  to  her  that  he 
was  a  bachelor.  He  had  been  married  to  his  maniac 
wife  when  he  was  very  young,  through  the  influence 
of  a  mercenary  father  and  a  heartless  brother.  How 
far  was  he  justifiable  in  attempting  to  marry  again 
while  she  was  alive  ?  In  order  to  do  Charlotte  Bronte 
justice,  and  to  obviate  all  doubt  that  we  have  the 
character  of  Rochester  fully  and  favourably  presented 
to  us,  we  shall  take  his  plea  from  his  own  lips,  as  he 
stated  it  to  Jane  one  lovely  morning  in  the  garden, 
when  the  air  was  fragrant  with  sweet-brier,  and 
bright  with  apple-blossom. 

"  Now,  my  little  friend,  while  the  sun  drinks  the  dew — while  all 
the  flowers  in  this  old  garden  awake  and  expand,  and  the  birds 
fetch  their  young  ones'  breakfast  out  of  the  cornfield,  and  the  early 
bees  do  their  first  spell  of  work — I'll  put  a  case  to  you,  which  you 
must  endeavour  to  suppose  your  own  ;  but  first,  look  at  me,  and 
tell  me  you  are  at  ease,  and  not  fearing  that  I  err  in  detaining 
you,  or  that  you  err  in  staying."  "No,  sir;  I  am  content." 
"  Well,  then,  Jane,  call  to  your  aid  your  fancy; — suppose  you  were 
no  longer  a  girl,  well  reared  and  disciplined,  but  a  wild  boy, 
indulged  from  childhood  upwards;  imagine  yourself  in  a  remote 
foreign  land ;  conceive  that  you  there  commit  a  capital  error,  no 
matter  of  what  nature  or  from  what  motives,  but  one  whose  con- 
sequences must  follow  you  through  life  and  taint  all  your  existence. 
Mind,  I  don't  say  a  crime  ;  I  am  not  speaking  of  shedding  of  blood 
or  any  other  guilty  act,  which  might  make  the  perpetrators  amen- 
able to  the  law :  my  word  is  error.  The  results  of  what  you  have 
done  become  in  time  to  you  utterly  insupportable;  you  take 
measures  to  obtain  relief ;  unusual  measures,  but  neither  unlawful 
nor  culpable.  Still  you  are  miserable  ;  for  hope  has  quitted  you 
on  the  very  confines  of  life  ;  your  sun  at  noon  darkens  in  an 
eclipse,  which  you  feel  will  not  leave  it  till  the  time  of  setting. 
Bitter  and  base  associations  have  become  the  sole  food  of  your 
memory;  you  wander  here  and  there,  seeking  rest  in  exilej: 


Rochester's  Plea.  277 


happiness  in  pleasure — I  mean  in  heartless,  sensual  pleasure — such 
as  dulls  intellect  and  blights  feeling.  Heart-weary  and  soul- 
withered,  you  come  home  after  years  of  voluntary  banishment ; 
you  make  a  new  acquaintance — how  or  where  no  matter ;  you  find 
in  this  stranger  much  of  the  good  and  bright  qualities  which  you 
have  sought  for  twenty  years,  and  never  before  encountered ;  and 
they  are  all  fresh,  healthy,  without  soil  and  without  taint.  Such 
society  revives,  regenerates ;  you  feel  better  days  come  back — 
higher  wishes,  purer  feelings;  you  desire  to  recommence  your 
life,  and  to  spend  what  remains  to  you  of  days  in  a  way  more 
worthy  of  an  immortal  being.  To  attain  this  end,  are  you  justified 
in  overleaping  an  obstacle  of  custom — a  mere  conventional  im- 
pediment, which  neither  your  conscience  sanctifies,  nor  your 
judgment  approves?" 

He  paused  for  an  answer,  and  what  was  I  to  say  ?  Oh,  for  some 
good  spirit  to  suggest  a  judicious  and  satisfactory  response  !  Vain 
aspiration !  The  west  wind  whispered  in  the  ivy  round  me  ;  but 
no  gentle  Ariel  borrowed  its  breath  as  a  medium  of  speech ;  the 
birds  sang  in  the  tree-tops,  but  their  song,  however  sweet,  was 
inarticulate.  Again  Mr.  Eochester  propounded  his  query,  "  Is  the 
wandering  and  sinful,  but  now  rest-seeking  and  repentant,  man 
justified  in  daring  the  world's  opinion,  in  order  to  attach  to  him 
for  ever  this  gentle,  gracious,  genial  stranger,  thereby  securing  his 
own  peace  of  mind  and  regeneration  of  life  ?  "  "  Sir,"  I  answered, 
"  a  wanderer's  repose  or  a  sinner's  reformation  should  never 
depend  on  a  fellow-creature.  Men  and  women  die ;  philosophers 
falter  in  wisdom,  and  Christians  in  goodness.  If  any  one  you 
know  has  suffered  and  erred,  let  him  look  higher  than  his  equals 
for  strength  to  amend,  and  solace  to  heal."  "But  the  instrument 
— the  instrument !  God,  who  does  the  work,  ordains  the  instru- 
ment. I  have  myself—  I  tell  it  you  without  parable— been 
worldly,  dissipated,  restless  man ;  and  I  believe  I  have  found  the 

instrument  for  my  cure  in ."     He  paused;  the  birds  went  on 

carolling,  the  leaves  lightly  rustling. 

Shall  we  pronounce  Rochester  a  true  hero,  or  a 
theatrical  scamp,  or  something  between  the  two? 
The  question  is  too  important  to  be  answered  in  the 
fag  end  of  a  chapter. 


CHAPTEE  X. 

GHAELOTTE  BRONTE'S  DEFENCE  OF  JANE  EYRE 
—ROCHESTER  AN  EGOIST—  THE  PRECISE 
CHARGES  AGAINST  JANE  EYRE-  JANE'S  DIS- 
APPOINTMENT—ROCHESTER'S LAST  WORD- 
JANE  IN  EXTREMIS-  OUR  VERDICT  ON  THE 
AUTHOR. 


force  of  Rochester's  plea  for  himself  might  be 
JL  enhanced  if  we  in  imagination  accompanied 
him  and  Jane,  and  the  clergyman  and  clerk,  and  Mr. 
Mason,  who  interrupted  the  marriage  ceremony,  from 
the  altar  to  the  room  in  which  his  maniac  wife  was 
confined.  But  this  is  happily  not  necessary.  Ro- 
chester had  been  grievously  sinned  against  —  cajoled  in 
his  youth  into  marriage  with  one  of  "  a  mad  family, 
idiots  and  maniacs  through  three  generations  ;  "  his 
wife  was  a  drunkard,  and  worse,  before  she  became  a 
raging  lunatic,  and  nothing  could  be  more  hideously 
infra-human  than  her  final  state.  He  "meant,"  there- 
fore, to  use  his  own  words,  "  to  be  a  bigamist,"  and  he 
"  entrapped,"  or  did  his  best  to  entrap,  "  into  a  feigned 
union,"  a  girl  of  eighteen,  whose  residence  under  his 
roof,  in  capacity  of  governess,  gave  him  his  oppor- 
tunity. Voila,  the  plain  facts. 


Charlotte  Bronte's  Self -Defence.  279 

Rochester's  plea  was  not  universally  sustained  by 
the  readers  of  Jane  Eyre.  To  the  second  edition  of 
the  book  Charlotte  Bronte  affixed  a  preface,  in  which 
she  took  to  task  "  the  timorous  or  carping  few  "  who 
pronounced  its  tendency  questionable,  its  morality 
doubtful.  Her  unfavourable  critics  are  therein  de- 
scribed as  persons  "  in  whose  eyes  whatever  is  un- 
usual is  wrong ;  whose  ears  detect  in  each  protest 
against  bigotry — that  parent  of  crime — an  insult  to 
piety,  that  regent  of  God  on  earth."  Bather  hard 
measure  to  deal  out  to  the  unfavourable  critics,  one 
must  admit.  She  suggests  to  them  "  certain  obvious 
distinctions,"  reminds  them  of  "certain  simple  truths." 
We  are  bound  to  bestow  upon  these  our  best  atten- 
tion. The  following  is  her  statement  of  them : — 
"  Conventionality  is  not  morality.  Self-righteousness 
is  not  religion.  To  attack  the  first  is  not  to  assail 
the  last.  To  pluck  the  mask  from  the  face  of  the 
Pharisee  is  not  to  lift  an  impious  hand  to  the  crown 
of  thorns.  These  things  and  deeds  are  diametrically 
opposed :  they  are  as  distinct  as  is  vice  from  virtue. 
Men  too  often  confound  them  :  they  should  not  be 
confounded ;  appearance  should  not  be  mistaken  for 
truth ;  narrow  human  doctrines,  that  only  tend  to 
elate  and  magnify  a  few,  should  not  be  substituted  for 
the  world-redeeming  creed  of  Christ.  There  is — I 
repeat  it — a  difference  ;  and  it  is  a  good,  and  not  a  bad 
action,  to  mark  broadly  and  clearly  the  line  of  separa- 
tion between  them.  The  world  may  not  like  to  see 
these  ideas  dissevered,  for  it  has  been  accustomed  to 


280  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

blend  them;  finding  it  convenient  to  make  external 
show  pass  for  sterling  worth — to  let  white-washed 
walls  vouch  for  clean  shrines.  It  may  hate  him  who 
dares  to  scrutinise  and  expose — to  rase  the  gilding, 
and  show  hase  metal  under  it — to  penetrate  the 
sepulchre,  and  reveal  charnel  relics  ;  but  hate  as  it 
will,  it  is  indebted  to  him.  Ahab  did  not  like  Micaiah, 
because  he  never  prophesied  good  concerning  him,  but 
evil;  probably  he  liked  the  sycophant  son  of  Chena- 
anah  better ;  yet  might  Ahab  have  escaped  a  bloody 
death,  had  he  but  stopped  his  ears  to  flattery,  and 
opened  them  to  faithful  counsel." 

These  diamond-pointed  sentences  afford  the  most 
humorously-beautiful  illustration  known  to  me  in 
literature  of  that  style  of  argument  which  is  un- 
gallantly,  and  perhaps  unjustly,  called  lady's  logic. 
With  charming  coolness — with  winning  and  child- 
like naivete  —  Charlotte  Bronte  begs  the  whole 
question,  and  assumes  what  she  is  bound  to  prove. 
No  sane  man,  from  Nova  Zembla  to  Cape  Comorin, 
from  Pekin  to  Birmingham,  could  confound  the  things 
she  distinguishes,  or  dispute  the  truths  she  enunciates. 
But  when  all  these  generalities  have  been  admitted  and 
put  aside,  the  question  remains,  whether  Rochester  is 
a  legitimate  hero,  and  whether  the  ethical  foundations 
of  the  novel  are  sound.  The  preliminary  flourish  of 
the  advocate  is  extremely  fine — but  she  commits  the 
slight  mistake  of  not  following  it  up  by  any  argu- 
ment whatever— of  not  once  referring  to  the  facts  in 
evidence.  We  must  repair  her  omission,  remarking 


Eochester  an  Egoist.  281 

that  the  advocate  must  be  held  to  plead  not  only  her 
hero's  cause,  but  her  own.  She  unquestionably  be- 
speaks the  admiration  of  the  reader  for  Rochester. 
This  is  on  the  face  of  the  ,  novel.  He  is  made 
attractive.  Courage,  firmness,  manliness,  ardour, 
talent,  soldierly  frankness,  are  his  characteristics, 
and  he  rides  his  black  horse  Mesrour  like  a  prince. 

Looking  searchingly  then  into  Rochester's  plea, 
what  better,  let  us  ask,  is  he  at  bottom  than  an 
egoist  ?  In  his  selfishness  he  does  not  scruple  to  lie. 
He  has  not  resolutely  adjusted  himself  to  the  melan- 
choly circumstances  which  have  darkened  his  life,  but 
has  drawn  a  veil  over  them  ;  and  he  attempts,  though 
it  be  by  criminal  means,  to  evade  the  misfortune  under 
which  he  has  fallen.  His  own  word  "  entrap  "  applies 
strictly  to  his  conduct  in  relation  to  Jane,  for  if  he 
intended  to  make  of  her  a  friend  and  nominal  wife,  he 
ought  to  have  let  her  know  precisely  how  matters 
stood,  and  to  have  obtained  her  consent  or  refusal. 
But  the  darkest  symptom  in  Rochester's  case  is  one 
which  Charlotte  Bronte  must,  I  fear,  be  held  not  only 
to  condone,  but  to  enter  in  mitigation  of  his  offence.  I 
allude  to  his  suggestion  as  to  the  religious  elevation  of 
his  motives  in  deceiving  Jane.  What  he  says  about 
receiving  a  heavenly  visitant  into  his  breast  when  the 
idea  occurs  to  him  of  marrying  the  governess,  about 
knowing  that  his  *'  Maker  sanctions  "  what  he  does, 
and  so  forth,  is  cant.  A  ruggedly  honest  man,— a 
healthily  strong  man, — though  he  might  be  passion- 
driven  into  crime,  would  not  fall  into  sickly  self- 


282  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

deception  like  this.  The  personage  who,  with  a  wife 
in  the  garret,  snivels  about  little  Jane  being  the  instru- 
ment ordained  by  Providence  to  work  out  his  reforma- 
tion, must  have  a  vein  of  rather  malignant  humbug  in 
him.  Heep's  parade  of  his  'umbleness,  Pecksniffs 
advertisement  of  his  generosity,  are  superficial  weak- 
nesses compared  with  the  rooted  falseness  of  cant  like 
this.  I  should  not  call  Kochester  a  scoundrel  or  a 
worthless  fellow,  but  he  falls  below  the  lowest 
standard  of  a  heroic  character.  Yet  he  is  the  hero 
of  this  book;  and  so  attractive  is  he  made — so 
effectually  are  his  bad  elements  masked  in  his 
fascinating  qualities— that,  of  the  tens  of  thousands 
of  girls  who  have  hung  enraptured  over  the  pages  of 
Jane  Eyre,  I  should  doubt  whether  one  of  a  thousand 
has  not  fallen  in  love  with  Rochester.  Thackeray 
took  it  for  many  years  as  his  mission  to  castigate 
those  writers  of  fiction  who  arrayed  vice  in  the 
attractiveness  pertaining  legitimately  to  virtue.  The 
representative  of  such  writers  he  found  in  the  author 
of  Pelham  and  Ernest  Maltravers,  and  no  one,  I  think, 
has  ventured  to  maintain  that  his  censure  was  wholly 
unjust  or  uncalled  for ;  but  the  subtly  seductive  and 
cunningly  masked  badness  of  Rochester  is  fitted  to 
exert  a  far  deadlier  influence  than  that  of  the  gorgeous 
voluptuaries  whom  one  smiles  at  in  those  romances 
that  carried  the  name  of  Bulwer  over  the  world. 

Let  it  not,  however,  be  supposed  that  I  charge 
Charlotte  Bronte  with  what  Scotch  lawyers  would 
call  homologating  Eochester.  She  does  not  take  him 


The  Charges  against  Jane  Eyre  Defined.     283 

over  as  all  right,  and  cover  him  with  the  mantle  of 
her  approval.  We  cannot  make  her  answerable  for 
more  than  Jane's  estimate  of  Rochester — for  the 
treatment  which,  first  and  last,  he  obtains  at  Jane's 
hands ;  but  she  is  assuredly  answerable  for  this. 
Jane,  it  is  true,  does  not  take  Rochester  at  his  own 
valuation.  She  starts  back  so  soon  as  she  knows 
what  he  has  prepared  for  her ;  declines  to  exculpate 
him;  promptly  leaves  his  house.  Her  previous  con- 
duct had  not  been  faultless,  but  neither  had  it  been 
gravely  censurable.  She  had  not  been  duly  respect- 
ful to  herself,  duly  sensible  of  her  dignity  as  a 
teacher,  of  her  rights  as  a  woman  and  a  lady ;  but 
she  was  very  young,  and  she  came  from  Lowood 
school,  where  she  had  been  accustomed  to  answer 
"Yes,  sir,"  "  No,  sir,"  to  the  portentous  Mr.  Brockle- 
hurst.  It  was  a  more  serious  offence  to  the  right 
instincts  of  a  woman,  that  she  should  listen  to 
Rochester's  unedifying  account  of  his  Parisian  ex- 
periences. No  man  perfectly  entitled  to  the  name 
of  gentleman  would  have  stained  the  imagination  of 
a  girl  in  that  way ;  no  woman  entitled  to  the  name 
of  lady  would  have  permitted  her  imagination  to  be 
so  stained.  Charlotte  Bronte  had  no  such  sense  of 
delicacy,  in  man  or  woman,  as  was  possessed  by  Miss 
Austen,  greatly  more  original  and  potent  as  I  hold 
her  genius  to  have,  on  the  whole,  been  than  that  of 
her  matronly  and  sweet-minded  predecessor.  But 
Jane  stops  short  of  actual  degradation.  When  the 
catastrophe  comes,  she  is  true  to  herself,  and  in  her 


284  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

inflexible  resistance  to  Bochester  we  see  how,  under 
like  circumstances,  Charlotte,  the  intrepid  little  York- 
shire-woman, would  have  acted.  Jane  had  loved 
Bochester  with  all  the  energy  of  her  keen  brain  and 
virgin  heart.  He  had  seemed  to  be  lifting  her  into 
exquisite  bliss.  The  extent  of  her  distress  when  the 
shock  arrived  we  are  enabled  to  realise  when  we 
accompany  her  into  her  room  after  the  clergyman 
and  the  lawyer  have  left  Thornneld  Hall.  She  bolts 
her  door,  takes  off  her  marriage  dress,  and,  in  the 
consciousness  that  the  place  she  had  been  about  to 
occupy  is  already  occupied  by  a  hideous  maniac, 
begins  to  think.  The  passage  in  which  her  reflec- 
tions and  feelings  are  expressed  is  another  of  those 
that  mark  Charlotte  Bronte  as  a  poet  and  great 
literary  artist.  Its  imagery — in  particular  its  brief, 
superb  contrast  of  wintry  grief  with  summer  glad- 
ness— is  unsurpassable. 

Jane  Eyre,  who  had  been  an  ardent,  expectant  woman — almost 
a  bride — was  a  cold,  solitary  girl  again :  her  life  was  pale  ;  her 
prospects  were  desolate.  A  Christmas  frost  had  come  at  Mid- 
summer ;  a  white  December  storm  had  whirled  over  June ;  *  ice 
glazed  the  ripe  apples,  drifts  crushed  the  blowing  roses ;  on  hay- 
field  and  cornfield  lay  a  frozen  shroud;  lanes  which  last  night 
blushed  full  of  flowers,  to-day  were  pathless  with  untrodden  snow ; 
and  the  woods,  which  twelve  hours  since  waved  leafy  and  fragrant 
as  groves  between  the  tropics,  now  spread  waste,  wild,  and  white 
as  pine-forests  in  wintry  Norway.  My  hopes  were  all  dead, — 
struck  with  a  subtle  doom,  such  as,  in  one  night,  fell  on  all  the 
first-born  in  the  land  of  Egypt.  I  looked  on  my  cherished  wishes, 
yesterday  so  blooming  and  glowing;  they  lay  stark,  chill,  livid 

*  "  Seek  roses  in  December,  ice  in  June." — Byron. 


Jane's  Disappointment.  285 

corpses  that  could  never  revive.  I  looked  at  my  love  ;  that  feeling 
which  was  my  master's — which  he  had  created ;  it  shivered  in  my 
heart  like  a  suffering  child  in  a  cold  cradle ;  sickness  and  anguish 
had  seized  it ;  it  could  not  seek  Mr.  Rochester's  arms — it  could  not 
derive  warmth  from  his  breast.  Oh,  never  more  could  it  turn  to 
him,  for  faith  was  blighted — confidence  destroyed  !  Mr.  Rochester 
was  not  to  me  what  he  had  been ;  for  he  was  not  what  I  had 
thought  him.  I  would  not  ascribe  vice  to  him ;  I  would  not  say 
he  had  betrayed  me ;  but  the  attribute  of  stainless  truth  was  gone 
from  his  idea ;  and  from  his  presence  I  must  go ;  that  I  perceived 
well.  When  ? — how  ? — whither  ?  I  could  not  yet  discern  ;  but  he 
himself,  I  doubted  not,  would  hurry  me  from  Thornfield.  Real 
affection,  it  seemed,  he  could  not  have  for  me  ;  it  had  been  only 
fitful  passion :  that  was  baulked ;  he  would  want  me  no  more.  I 
should  fear  even  to  cross  his  path  now  :  my  view  must  be  hateful 
to  him.  Oh,  how  blind  had  been  my  eyes !  How  weak  my 
conduct ! 

My  eyes  were  covered  and  closed ;  eddying  darkness  seemed  to 
swim  round  me,  and  reflection  came  in  as  black  and  confused  a 
flow.  Self-abandoned,  relaxed,  and  effortless,  I  seemed  to  have 
laid  me  down  in  the  dried-up  bed  of  a  great  river  ;  I  heard  a  flood 
loosened  in  remote  mountains,  and  felt  the  torrent  come  ;  to  rise  I 
had  no  will,  to  flee  I  had  no  strength.  I  lay  faint;  longing  to  be 
dead.  One  idea  only  still  throbbed  life-like  within  me — a  remem- 
brance of  God ;  it  begot  an  unuttered  prayer.  These  words  went 
wandering  up  and  down  in  my  rayless  mind,  as  something  that 
should  be  whispered  ;  but  no  energy  was  found  to  express  them  : 
"  Be  not  far  from  me,  for  trouble  is  near  ;  there  is  none  to  help." 

It  was  near ;  and  as  I  had  lifted  no  petition  to  heaven  to  avert  it 
— as  I  had  neither  joined  my  hands,  nor  bent  my  knees,  nor 
moved  my  lips — it  came  :  in  full,  heavy  swing  the  torrent  poured 
over  me.  The  whole  consciousness  of  my  life  lorn,  my  love  lost, 
my  hope  quenched,  my  faith  death-struck,  swayed  full  and  mighty 
above  me  in  one  sullen  mass.  That  bitter  hour  cannot  be 
described;  in  truth,  "the  waters  came  into  my  soul,  I  sank  in 
deep  mire  ;  I  felt  no  standing,  I  came  into  deep  waters  ;  the  floods 
overflowed  me." 

It   was   now  that   the  fiercest   trial   of  her  virtue 
began.     While  she  shook  like  a  reed  under  the  stress 


286  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

of  her  anguish,  she  found  herself  again  in  the 
presence  of  Kochester.  He  was  contrite ;  he  spoke 
in  the  tone  of  one  who  was  broken-hearted.  "  Jane, 
I  never  meant  to  wound  you  thus.  If  the  man  who 
had  but  one  little  ewe  lamb  that  was  dear  to  him  as  a 
daughter,  that  ate  of  his  bread  and  drank  of  his  cup, 
and  lay  in  his  bosom,  had  by  some  mistake  slaughtered 
it  at  the  shambles,  he  would  not  have  rued  his  bloody 
blunder  more  than  I  now  rue  mine.  Will  you  ever 
forgive  me?"  She  forgave  him;  but  repelled  him 
decisively  when  he  attempted  to  caress  her,  remind- 
ing him  that  he  had  a  wife,  and  stating  her  deter- 
mination to  leave  him.  Thereupon  he  entered  more 
explicitly  than  he  had  ever  done  before  on  an  explana- 
tion of  his  circumstances,  insisting  that,  whatever 
might  be  his  position  in  the  eye  of  human  law,  he 
was,  in  the  sight  of  God,  divorced  from  his  wedded 
wife.  It  was  not  only  that  he  had  been  grossly 
deceived  before  the  marriage,  or  that  she  had  been 
intolerable  afterwards ;  she  had,  he  said,  conducted 
herself  so  as  to  entitle  him  to  a  legal  divorce ;  but 
"the  doctors  now  discovered  that  my  wife  was  mad 
— her  excesses  had  prematurely  developed  the  germs 
of  insanity."  Legal  proceedings,  therefore,  could  not 
be  resorted  to. 

Whether  Rochester  was  right  or  wrong  in  thus 
defining  his  position  before  the  law  may  be  open  to 
question.  The  prevailing  impression,  at  the  time  when 
Jane  Eyre  was  written,  undoubtedly  concurred  with 
the  view  he  takes  of  his  case ;  but,  since  then,  events 


Rochester's  Last  Word.  287 

have  taken  place  which  suggest  a  doubt  whether  he 
might  not  have  obtained  legal  relief.  A  poor  man,  it 
is  too  true,  who  was  forced  to  maintain  a  lunatic  wife 
in  an  asylum,  and  who  applied  for  a  divorce  on  account 
of  her  unfaithfulness  before  madness  had  ensued,  was 
driven,  almost  with  hootings,  from  the  judgment-seat ; 
but  when  a  rich  man,  a  man  of  title,  applied  for  a 
divorce  on  exactly  the  same  grounds,  he  found  English 
law  not  inexorable  to  a  petition  that  aristocratic  blood 
might  be  warded  from  taint.  Eochester  was  a  rich 
man  and  of  an  old  family,  and  he  might  possibly  have 
found  the  aristocratic  luxury  called  justice  not  so 
unobtainable  as  he  thought.  All  this,  however,  was 
unknown  to  Charlotte  Bronte  when  she  published 
Jane  Eyre.  She  had  a  right  to  represent  her  hero  as 
barred  from  proceedings  against  his  wife. 

Eochester  next  describes  to  Jane  how  the  misery  of 
his  indissoluble  connection  drove  him  almost  to  suicide. 
Then  a  new  hope  awoke  within  him.  "  That  woman," 
whispered  the  new  hope,  "who  has  so  abused  your 
long-suffering,  so  sullied  your  name,  so  outraged  your 
honour,  so  blighted  your  youth,  is  not  your  wife — nor 
are  you  her  husband.  See  that  she  is  cared  for  as  her 
condition  demands,  and  you  have  done  all  that  God  and 
humanity  require  of  you."  He  was  then  in  the  West 
Indies.  Animated  with  his  new  purpose,  he  sailed  for 
Europe,  immured  his  wife  in  Thornfield  Hall  under 
the  charge  of  Grace  Poole,  set  out  for  the  Continent, 
and  "  pursued  wanderings  as  wild  as  those  of  the 
March-spirit."  What  he  sought  for  was  a  woman  to 


288  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

whom  he  could  tell  all,  who  might  take  his  own  view 
of  his  position,  "  understand  "  him  and  "  accept  "  him. 
He  found  that  his  ideal  woman  could  not  be  dis- 
covered. He  had  recourse  to  unideal  women — much 
the  reverse  of  ideal.  They  did  not  answer.  Return- 
ing to  his  native  country  "  in  a  harsh,  bitter  frame  of 
mind,  the  result  of  a  useless,  roving,  lonely  life,"  he 
met  little  Jane  on  the  frost-bound  highway.  "  When 
once  I  had  pressed  the  frail  shoulder,  something  new 
— a  Iresh  sap  and  sense — stole  into  my  frame."  He 
dwells  with  glowing  tenderness  upon  the  incidents  of 
their  life  in  Thornfield  Hall,  and  brings  his  whole  tale 
to  a  climax  of  entreaty.  "  Jane,  you  understand  what 
I  want  of  you?  Just  this  promise — '  I  will  be  yours, 
Mr.  Rochester.' "  She  had  now  heard  not  only  his 
plea,  but  his  proposed  application  of  its  ethical  princi- 
ples to  the  circumstances  of  his  position  :  her  reply 
was  brief,  clear,  and  right.  "  Mr.  Rochester,  I  will 
no t  be  yours." 

"  Jane,"  recommenced  he,  with  a  gentleness  that  broke  me 
down  with  grief,  and  turned  me  stone-cold  with  ominous  terror — 
for  this  still  voice  was  the  pant  of  a  lion  rising — "  Jane,  do  you 
mean  to  go  one  way  in  the  world,  and  to  let  me  go  another  ? "  "I 
do."  "And  now?"  softly  kissing  my  forehead  and  cheek.  "I 
(jo" — extricating  myself  from  restraint  rapidly  and  completely. 
"  Oh,  Jane,  this  is  bitter  !  This — this  is  wicked.  It  would  not  be 
wicked  to  love  me."  "  It  would  to  obey  you."  A  wild  look 
raised  his  brow — crossed  his  features  :  he  rose ;  but  he  forebore  yet. 
I  laid  my  hand  on  the  back  of  a  chair  for  support:  I  shook,  I 
feared — but  I  resolved.  "  One  instant,  Jane.  Give  one  glance  to 
my  horrible  life.  When  you  are  gone  ah1  happiness  will  be  torn 
away  with  you.  Wha\i,  then,  is  left  ?  For  a  wife  I  have  but  the 
maniac  upstairs :  as  well  might  you  refer  me  to  some  corpse  in 


Jane  in  Extremis.  289 

yonder  churchyard.  What  shall  I  do,  Jane  ?  Where  turn  for  a 
companion,  and  for  some  hope  ?  "  "  Do  as  I  do  :  trust  in  God  and 
yourself.  Believe  in  heaven.  Hope  to  meet  again  there."  ."  Then 
you  will  not  yield?"  "No."  "Then  you  condemn  me  to  live 
wretched,  and  to  die  accursed?"  His  voice  rose.  "I  advise  you 
to  live  sinless  ;  and  I  wish  you  to  die  tranquil."  "  Then  you  snatch 
love  and  innocence  from  me  ?  You  fling  me  back  on  lust  for  a 
passion — vice  for  an  occupation?"  "Mr.  Eochester,  I  no  more 
assign  this  fate  to  you  than  I  grasp  at  it  for  myself.  We  were  born 
to  strive  and  endure — you  as  well  as  I :  do  so.  You  will  forget  me 
before  I  forget  you."  "You  make  me  a  liar  by  such  language: 
you  sully  my  honour.  I  declared  I  could  not  change  :  you  tell  me 
to  my  face  I  shall  change  soon.  And  what  a  distortion  in  your 
judgment,  what  a  perversity  in  your  ideas,  is  proved  by  your 
conduct !  Is  it  better  to  drive  a  fellow-creature  to  despair  than  to 
transgress  a  mere  human  law — no  man  being  injured  by  the 
breach  ? — for  you  have  neither  relatives  nor  acquaintances  whom 
you  need  fear  to  offend  by  living  with  me."  This  was  true;  and 
while  he  spoke  my  very  conscience  and  reason  turned  traitors 
against  me,  and  charged  me  with  crime  in  resisting  him.  They 
spoke  almost  as  loud  as  Feeling:  and  that  clamoured  wildly.  "Oh, 
comply  !  "  it  said.  "Think  of  his  misery;  think  of  his  danger- 
look  at  his  state  when  left  alone ;  remember  his  headlong  nature  ; 
consider  the  recklessness  following  on  despair — soothe  him  ;  save 
him  ;  love  him  ;  tell  him  you  love  him  and  will  be  his.  Who  in 
the  world  cares  for  you  ?  or  who  will  be  injured  by  what  you 
do?" 

Still,  indomitable  was  the  reply — "  I  care  for  myself.  The  more 
solitary,  the  more  friendless,  the  more  unsustained  I  am,  the  more 
I  will  respect  myself.  I  will  keep  the  law  given  by  God,  sanctioned 
by  man.  I  will  hold  to  the  principles  received  by  me  when  I  was 
sane  and  not  mad — as  I  am  now.  Laws  and  principles  are  not  for 
the  times  when  there  is  no  temptation :  they  are  for  such  moments 
as  this,  when  body  and  soul  rise  in  mutiny  against  their  rigour ; 
stringent  are  they ;  inviolate  they  shall  be.  If  at  my  individual 
convenience  I  might  break  them,  what  would  be  their  worth? 
They  have  a  worth — so  I  have  always  believed  ;  and  if  I  cannot 
believe  it  now,  it  is  because  I  am  insane — quite  insane  :  with  my 
veins  running  fire,  and  my  heart  beating  faster  than  I  can  count 
its  throbs.  Preconceived  opinions,  foregone  determinations,  are  all 
I  have  at  this  hour  to  stand  by :  there  I  plant  my  foot." 

19 


290  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

So  she  conquered.  Simple,  sound — the  very  founda- 
tions of  human  society — the  adamant  on  which  the 
pillars  of  the  household  and  of  the  State  alike  rest — 
are  these  principles  of  morality :  and  they  did  not  fail 
her.  Rochester  was  an  egoist,  but  one  of  a  high 
order :  we  should  utterly  misconceive  his  character,  as 
imagined  by  Charlotte  Bronte,  if  we  thought  him 
capable,  even  though  he  might  threaten  it,  of  resort- 
ing to  violence.  He  was  vanquished,  and  sank  into 
silence.  Jane  left  Thornfield,  and  did  not  again  look 
into  the  face  of  Eochester  till  she  could  respond 
honourably  to  his  love.  The  worst  charge,  therefore, 
which  we  can  bring  against  Charlotte  Bronte  in  rela- 
tion to  this  novel  is  that  she  casts  too  great  a  charm 
over  Rochester,  not  that  she  does  not  discern  him  to 
be  blameworthy.  The  length  to  which  he  protracted 
his  persecution  of  Jane  was,  next  to  his  hypocrisy, 
the  worst  thing  in  his  conduct.  No  man  could  have 
a  right  to  bait  and  badger  a  woman  like  that ;  and  if 
Jane  had  been  a  little  more  strong  and  a  little  more 
proud,  she  would  never  have  favoured  him  with 
another  look  of  her  face.  Am  I  right  here,  ladies  ? 


CHAPTEK   XI. 

WOMEN'S  EIGHTS— THE  ETHICS  OF  ABNEGATION 
—MB  MEBEDITH  ON  EGOISM— THACKERAY'S 
MORAL  ANALYSIS— JANE  LEAVES  THORN- 
FIELD-THE  REST  OF  THE  BOOK. 

IT  is  worth  while,  in  these  days  of  vociferous  debate 
concerning  the  place  of  women  in  the  social 
system,  when  perfect  equality  between  men  and 
women  is  indignantly  claimed  as  a  right,  or  asserted 
as  a  fact,  by  a  thousand  voices,  to  take  note  of  Jane 
Eyre's  mode  of  allusion  to  Kochester's  career  of  dis- 
sipation during  his  wife's  lunacy.  She  does  not  quite 
approve  of  his  successive  liaisons,  but  her  rebuke  is 
the  mildest  of  upbraiding  glances.  "  Jane,"  he  says, 
pausing  in  his  narrative,  "  I  see  by  your  face  you  are 
not  forming  a  very  favourable  opinion  of  me  just  now. 
You  think  me  an  unfeeling,  loose-principled  rake, 
don't  you?"  "I  don't  like  you,"  she  replies,  "  so 
well  as  I  have  done  sometimes,  indeed,  sir.  Did  it 
not  seem  to  you  in  the  least  wrong  to  live  in  that 
way?  .  .  .  You  talk  of  it  as  a  mere  matter  of 
course."  "  It  was  with  me,"  he  somewhat  jauntily 

19—2 


292  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

answers  :  "  and  I  did  not  like  it.  It  was  a  grovelling 
fashion  of  existence ;  I  should  never  like  to  return  to 
it."  Jane  continues  to  look  grave.  She  will  not 
sanction  his  proceedings.  But  it  seems  never  to  have 
occurred  to  Charlotte  Bronte,  as  a  possible  way  of 
viewing  the  case,  that  Jane  might  have  said  to  him, 
"  Now  suppose,  Mr.  Rochester,  that  I  had  conducted 
myself  as  you  have  done,  and  had  then  bestowed  on 
you  so  frank  a  series  of  confidences  as  you  have 
bestowed  upon  me,  how  would  you  have  taken  it? 
and,  in  particular,  how  would  you  have  been  affected 
by  the  concluding  expression  of  superlative  affection 
for  yourself?  Would  you  have  accepted  this  last  with 
gratitude  and  ecstasy,  or  repelled  it  with  anger  and 
contempt  ?  "  This  is  what  it  must  come  to  if  women 
are  to  teach  men  to  do  justice  to  women  not  only  by 
precept  but  by  example. 

Morality  is,  after  all,  a  commonplace  affair,— 
commonplace  as  the  beaten  road  through  the  trea- 
cherous morass.  Eight  and  wrong  are  seldom  diffi- 
cult to  discriminate,  though  it  is  not  seldom  difficult 
to  do  the  one  and  refrain  from  doing  the  other.  As 
Pope  shrewdly  suggests,  the  energy  that  might  con- 
centrate itself  on  doing  the  right  is  apt  to  be  at- 
tenuated into  ingenuity  to  devise  excuses  for  doing 
the  wrong.  Mr.  Carlyle  has  been  vehement  beyond 
tolerance  of  ears  polite  in  his  contempt  for  the  modern 
notion  that  duty  can  arrange  a  compromise  with 
voluptuous  ease.  Not  moral  heroism  only;  but  the 
honesty,  the  habit  of  painful  persistent  work,  the 


Mr.  Meredith  on  Egoism.  293 

manly  acceptance  of  loss,  of  misfortune,  of  failure,  of 
irremediable  wrong,  without  mutinous  infraction  of 
the  divine-human  laws  of  society :  all  these,  which 
are  the  very  stuff  of  virtue  and  the  soul  of  nations, 
would  perish  if  Rochester's  practical  ethics  found 
universal  favour.  Abnegation  is  not  easy, — but  it 
cannot  be  dispensed  with  for  all  that.  Call  it,  in  the 
dialect  of  self-sufficient  humanism,  conscious  submis- 
sion to  necessity;  call  it,  in  the  language  of  old-world 
reverence,  bowing  of  the  back  to  the  burden  provi- 
dentially laid  upon  it, — the  thing,  once  for  all, 
cannot,  unless  man  degrades  into  a  beast,  become 
obsolete. 

The  root  of  Rochester's  moral  malady  is  his  egoism, 
and  Charlotte  Bronte  fails  chiefly,  not  in  perceiving 
the  fact  of  his  wrongness,  for  she  does  that,  but  in 
analysing  it.  Mr.  George  Meredith,  in  his  remarkable 
novel  The  Egoist,  furnishes  so  masterly  an  example  of 
the  kind  of  analysis  which  ought  to  have  been  applied 
to  Rochester,  that  I  am  glad  to  be  able  to  refer  to  it. 
Sir  Willoughby  Patterne  is  a  self- worshipper  of  the 
most  elaborate  get-up.  He  has  an  income  of  fifty 
thousand  pounds  drawn  from  land ;  his  family  is  old 
enough  to  give  him  a  pretence  for  pride  of  birth ;  he  is 
naturally  "  anything  but  obtuse,"  and  has  had  every 
advantage  of  education ;  he  is  handsome  in  figure, 
good-looking  in  face,  imposing  in  manner,  and  has 
been  nurtured  in  the  idolatry  of  his  mother  and  aunts. 
Such  a  man  is  the  most  eligible  match  in  his  county. 
Clara  Middleton,  an  exceedingly  beautiful  girl,  attracts 


294  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

his  attention,  accepts  his  hand,  and  fancies  herself  as 
happy  as  all  the  world  believes  her  to  be  enviable.  He 
cants  to  her  about  ideals,  and  about  ethereal  separa- 
tion from  the  world.  She  is,  however,  affectionate  and 
sincere,  and  while  Sir  Willoughby  discourses  of  the 
felicities  that  await  her  and  him,  it  gradually  dawns 
upon  her  that  there  is  a  hollowness  at  the  man's 
heart ;  that  he  is  like  a  cathedral  whose  painted 
windows  are  lit  up,  not  with  God's  sunlight  from 
without,  but  with  a  strange  and  sickly  light  derived 
from  the  lamp  which  perpetually  burns  in  its  centre  at 
the  shrine  of  self.  In  fact,  he  is  an  egoist ;  and  when 
this  word  is  accidentally  uttered  by  some  one  in  her 
hearing,  she  mentally  fixes  upon  it  as  the  title  that 
befits  and  explains  him.  In  place  of  the  vague  warmth 
of  admiration  with  which  she  had  previously  regarded 
him,  there  steals  over  her  an  absolute  horror  at  the 
idea  of  becoming  his  wife. 

Rochester's  egoism  is  of  a  different  kind  from  that  of 
Sir  Willoughby  Patterne.  It  has  less  of  the  element 
of  aristocratic  pride,  more  of  the  element  of  passion. 
Mr.  George  Meredith's  egoist  is  incapable  of  loving  any 
one  so  ardently  as  Rochester  loves  Jane.  But  love  that 
is  altogether  noble  dwells  first  and  supremely  on  the  hap- 
piness of  the  loved  one ;  and  it  cannot  be  maintained 
for  a  moment  that  Rochester  is  primarily  swayed  by 
what  is  due  to  Jane.  Of  himself  he  always  talks  ;  he 
does  not  implore  permission  to  make  her  happy,  but 
beseeches  her  to  confer  happiness  on  him.  The  test 
of  noble  and  knightly  passion  is  that  it  exults  in 


Thackeray's  Moral  Analysis.  295 

conferring  joy,  and  that  the  "  chord  of  self,"  struck 
by  it,  passes  in  music  "  out  of  sight."  The  egoism 
of  passion,  however,  is  more  human  and  morally 
hopeful  than  the  egoism  of  vanity  and  of  worldly 
pride. 

The  man  to  treat  Kochester  with  unique  felicity 
would  have  been  Thackeray.  The  performance  would 
have  been  a  faultless  masterpiece  of  moral  vivisection. 
That  combination  of  insight  into  human  nature  and 
experience  of  human  life,  with  the  finest  irony,  which 
distinguished  the  great  censor  and  humorist,  is  exactly 
what  was  required  for  the  problem.  Thackeray's  irony, 
never  cruel,  never  Swiftian,  yet  irresistible  in  its  sharp- 
ness and  fineness,  would  have  played  like  a  tongue  of 
lambent,  finely-laughing  fire  upon  Rochester's  views  of 
self-reformation,  upon  his  edifying  aspirations  after 
goodness,  his  generous  readiness  to  make  Jane's  fall 
the  instrument  of  his  spiritual  elevation,  his  self-pity- 
ing sentimentalism.  But  while  Thackeray  would  have 
left  us  under  no  mistake  as  to  what  he  thought  of 
Rochester's  heroism,  he  would  probably  have  repre- 
sented Jane  as  no  less  fascinated  and  subdued  by  him 
than  Charlotte  Bronte  shows  her  to  have  been.  It  is 
a  Chorus  we  want  to  the  play,  after  the  fashion  of  the 
Greek  drama,  and  this  part  of  Chorus  might  have  been 
taken  with  unsurpassable  effect  by  Thackeray.  The 
brief  snatches  of  comment  that  he  could  have  thrown 
in  while  he  made  Rochester  tell  his  own  story,  would 
have  had  a  still  more  delicate  aroma  of  humour  than 
those  'with  which  he  satirises  the  pretensions  of  Barry 


296  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

Lyndon.  He  would  not  have  made  Rochester  either 
quite  a  coxcomb  or  quite  a  histrio,  but  he  would  have 
brought  out  in  vivid  and  piquant  relief  the  lurking 
ingredients  of  coxcomb  and  histrio  which  Charlotte 
Bronte's  hand — perhaps  because  it  was  a  woman's 
hand — does  not  disclose  to  us. 

Miss  Martineau,  who  doubtless  had  the  information 
from  head-quarters,  tells  us  that  Charlotte  Bronte,  as 
she  proceeded  with  the  novel,  became  intensely  inter- 
ested in  the  fortunes  of  her  heroine,  whose  smallness 
and  plainness  corresponded  with  her  own.  When  she 
brought  little  Jane  to  Thornfield  her  enthusiasm  had 
grown  so  great  that  she  could  not  stop.  She  went  on 
"  writing  incessantly  for  three  weeks."  At  the  end  of 
this  time  she  had  made  the  minute  woman  conquer 
temptation,  and,  in  the  dawn  of  the  summer  morning, 
leave  Thornfield.  It  was  in  the  dead  of  winter  that 
the  great  agitation  of  Jane's  life  had  begun  with  the 
arrival  of  Rochester.  The  morning  was  now  lovely 
with  the  streaks  of  sunrise,  and  the  grass  was  bright 
with  dew  ;  but  the  icy  sharpness  of  that  winter  even- 
ing had  been  sweeter  to  Jane  than  this  balmy  summer 
morn.  "  I  looked  neither  to  rising  sun,  nor  smiling 
sky,  nor  wakening  nature.  He  who  is  taken  out  to 
pass  through  a  fair  scene  to  the  scaffold,  thinks  not  of 
the  flowers  that  smile  on  his  road,  but  of  the  block 
and  axe-edge  ;  of  the  disseverment  of  bone  and  vein  ; 
of  the  grave  gaping  at  the  end  :  and  I  thought  of  drear 
flight  and  homeless  wandering — and,  oh  !  with  agony 
I  thought  of  what  I  left.  I  could  not  help  it."  She  pic- 


Jane  Leaves  Thornfield.  297 

tured  to  herself  Eochester,  sleepless,  watching  the  dawn. 
She  trembled  lest,  on  discovering  her  flight,  he  might 
sink  into  self-abandonment  and  ruin.  Under  the  in- 
exorable rule  of  duty,  her  emotions  chafed  and  fretted 
like  fiery  horses  against  the  curb,  lashing  out  in  their 
rebellious  desire  for  freedom.  "Birds  began  singing 
in  brake  and  copse ;  birds  were  faithful  to  their 
mates;  birds  were  emblems  of  love.  What  was 
I?  In  the  midst  of  my  pain  of  heart  and  frantic 
effort  of  principle,  I  abhorred  myself.  I  had  no 
solace  from  self-approbation ;  none  even  from  self- 
respect.  I  had  injured — wounded — left  my  master. 
I  was  hateful  in  my  own  eyes.  Still  I  could  not  turn 
nor  retrace  one  step.  God  must  have  led  me  on.  As 
to  my  own  will  or  conscience,  impassioned  grief  had 
trampled  one  and  stifled  the  other.  I  was  weeping 
wildly  as  I  walked  along  my  solitary  way  ;  fast,  fast  I 
went  like  one  delirious."  This  is  imagined  with 
superb  power  and,  I  have  no  doubt,  with  substantial 
fidelity  to  truth  ;  but  the  phenomena  chronicled  are 
those  of  the  surface — those  which  a  spectator  would 
have  seen— those  of  which  Jane  herself  was  distinctly 
conscious  ;  and  beneath  all  these  was  the  great  deep 
of  Jane's  spiritual  nature,  unagitated  by  the  surface 
waves,  resting  on  the  immovable  foundations  of  the 
world,  the  changeless  laws  of  rectitude,  morality, 
religion. 

After  Jane  left  Thornfield  "  the  rest  of  the  book," 
says  Miss  Martineau,  "  was  written  with  less  vehe- 
mence, and  with  more  anxious  care  ;  the  world  adds, 


298  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

with  less  vigour  and  interest."  Miss  Martineau  seems, 
though  she  does  not  actually  say  so,  to  agree  with  the 
world;  and  I  certainly  do.  Jane's  experiences  be- 
tween the  time  of  her  departure  from  Thornfield  and 
her  return  to  Eochester  at  Ferndean  Manor  would 
form  an  excellent  one-volume  tale  ;  but,  in  relation  to 
the  main  interest  and  plan  of  this  book,  they  are  what 
magazine  editors  call  padding.  And  their  style  has 
that  elaborate  perfection — that  "  anxious  care,"  as 
Miss  Martineau  well  words  it — which  shows  that  the 
fires  of  imagination  had  subsided.  I  should  say  that, 
on  the  whole,  the  part  of  Jane  Eyre  which  comes 
between  the  heroine's  meeting  with  Kochester  and  her 
departure  from  Thornfield  is  more  deeply  imbued 
with  the  genius  and  imagination  of  Charlotte  Bronte 
than  anything  else  she  has  written.  In  fidelity  of 
characterisation, — in  consistency  of  thought,  feeling, 
speech,  conduct,  mood,  even  caprice, — Eochester  is  as 
fine  a  piece  of  artistic  portraiture  as  we  have  from 
Miss  Austen,  Thackeray,  or  Scott.  But  on  that 
matter  Mr.  Swinburne  has  sufficiently  enlarged. 


CHAPTEK    XII. 

M.  PAUL  EMANUEL—THE  PEOFESSOE  IN  CLASS 
—THE  BRONTE  LOVEES. 

THEEE  is  one  of  her  characters  which  some  might 
aver  to  be  executed  with  more  consummate  skill 
than  Rochester,  and  which,  whether  superior  or  in- 
ferior, is  so  differently  handled  that  it  may  be  profitable, 
as  well  as  interesting,  to  compare  the  two.  I  allude  to 
Paul  Emanuel,  professor  in  the  Villette  Seminary,  and 
lover  of  Lucy  Snowe.  Rochester  is  the  more  ima- 
ginatively conceived  portrait ;  M.  Paul  has  the  closer 
resemblance  to  a  living  man.  It  might,  indeed,  be 
argued,  though  I  should  not  care  to  maintain  the 
position  dogmatically,  that  Paul  Emanuel  is  too  much 
an  individual  to  attain  high  perfection  as  a  figure  in  a 
work  of  art.  It  is  with  the  type,  not  the  individual,  or 
at  least  with  the  type  in  the  individual,  that  art  con- 
cerns itself.  The  particulars  specified  regarding  him 
have  the  air,  indefinable  yet  unmistakable,  of  literal 
facts.  But  it  is  a  special  note  of  Charlotte  Bronte's 
work  that  both  Rochester  and  Paul  Emanuel  have 
harsh  and  repulsive,  as  well  as  attractive,  qualities. 
Charlotte  Bronte  never  forgets  to  give  "  the  bitter  of 


300  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

the  sweet  "  and  the  sweet  of  the  bitter,  in  her  charac- 
teristic heroes.  Eochester  is  imperious,  abrupt,  almost 
rude,  and  it  is  plain  that  Jane  likes  the  element  of  aus- 
terity in  her  "master."  Emanuelis  choleric,  arbitrary, 
eccentric,  even  cruelly  harsh.  When  his  temper  is 
ruffled,  he  makes  all  who  come  near  him  the  victims 
of  his  petulant  fury.  An  illustrative  passage  will 
enable  my  readers  to  know  what  I  mean  better  than 
any  words  of  mine.  Emanuel  had  just  delivered  to 
Lucy  Snowe  a  letter,  which  suggested  to  him  that  he 
had  a  rival  in  her  affections,  handing  it  to  her  with  "  a 
look  of  scowling  distrust."  She  retired  with  the  letter, 
and  presently  returned. 

When  I  re-entered  the  schoolroom,  behold  M.  Paul  raging  like 
a  pestilence !  Some  pupil  had  not  spoken  audibly  or  distinctly 
enough  to  suit  his  ear  and  taste,  and  now  she  and  others  were 
weeping,  and  he  was  raving  from  his  estrade  almost  livid.  Curious 
to  mention,  as  I  appeared,  he  fell  on  me.  "  Was  I  the  mistress  of 
these  girls?  Did  I  profess  to  teach  them  the  conduct  befitting 
ladies  ? — and  did  I  permit  and,  he  doubted  not,  encourage  them  to 
strangle  their  mother-tongue  in  their  throats,  to  mince  and  mash 
it  between  their  teeth,  as  if  they  had  some  base  cause  to  be 
ashamed  of  the  words  they  uttered  ?  Was  this  modesty  ?  He 
knew  better.  It  was  a  vile  pseudo-sentiment — the  offspring  or  the 
forerunner  of  evil.  Rather  than  submit  to  this  mopping  and 
mowing,  this  mincing  and  grimacing,  this  grinding  of  a  noble 
tongue,  this  general  affectation  and  sickening  stubbornness  of  the 
pupils  of  the  first  class,  he  would  throw  them  up  for  a  set  of 
insupportable  petites  mattresses,  and  confine  himself  to  teaching 
the  A  B  C  to  the  babies  of  the  third  division." 

What  could  I  say  to  all  this  ?  Keally  nothing ;  and  I  hoped  he 
would  allow  me  to  be  silent.  The  storm  recommenced.  "  Every 
answer  to  his  queries  was  then  refused?  It  seemed  to  be  con- 
sidered in  that  place — that  conceited  boudoir  of  a  first  class, 
with  its  pretentious  bookcases,  its  green-baized  desks,  its  rubbish 


M.  P.  Emanuel  in  Class.  301 

of  flower-stands,  its  trash  of  framed  pictures  and  maps,  and  its 
foreign  surveillante,  forsooth ! — it  seemed  to  be  the  fashion  to 
think  there  that  the  Professor  of  Literature  was  not  worthy  of  a 
reply !  These  were  new  ideas ;  imported,  he  did  not  doubt, 
straight  from  'la  Grande  Bretaigne  ' — they  savoured  of  island 
insolence  and  arrogance."  Lull  the  second — the  girls,  not  one  of 
whom  was  ever  known  to  weep  a  tear  for  the  rebukes  of  any  other 
master,  now  ah1  melting  like  snow- statues  before  the  intemperate 
heat  of  M.  Emanuel :  I  not  yet  much  shaken,  sitting  down,  and 
venturing  to  resume  my  work.  Something — either  in  my  con- 
tinued silence  or  in  the  movement  of  my  hand,  stitching — trans- 
ported M.  Emanuel  beyond  the  last  boundary  of  patience.  He 
actually  sprang  from  his  estrade.  The  stove  stood  near  my  desk ; 
he  attacked  it ;  the  little  iron  door  was  nearly  dashed  from  its 
hinges,  the  fuel  was  made  to  fly.  "  Est-ce  que  vous  avez  ^intention 
de  rriinsulter  ?  "  said  he  to  me,  in  a  low,  furious  voice,  as  he  thus 
outraged,  under  pretence  of  arranging,  the  fire. 

It  was  time  to  soothe  him  a  little.  "  Mais,  monsieur,"  said  I, 
"I  would  not  insult  you  for  the  world.  I  remember  too  well  that 
you  once  said  we  should  be  friends."  I  did  not  intend  my  voice  to 
falter,  but  it  did :  more,  I  think,  through  the  agitation  of  late 
delight  than  in  any  spasm  of  present  fear.  Still  there  certainly 
was  something  in  M.  Paul's  anger — a  kind  of  passion  of  emotion — 
that  specially  tended  to  draw  tears.  I  was  not  unhappy,  nor  much 
afraid,  yet  I  wept.  "Aliens,  allons!"  said  he  presently,  looking 
round  and  seeing  the  deluge  universal.  "  Decidedly  I  am  a 
monster  and  a  ruffian.  I  have  only  one  pocket-handkerchief,"  he 
added,  "but  if  I  had  twenty,  I  would  offer  you  each  one.  Your 
teacher  shall  be  your  representative.  Here,  Miss  Lucy."  And  he 
took  forth  and  held  out  to  me  a  clean  silk  handkerchief.  Now,  a 
person  who  did  not  know  M.  Paul,  who  was  unused  to  him  and 
his  impulses,  would  naturally  have  bungled  at  this  offer — declined 
accepting  the  same — et  cetera.  But  I  too  plainly  felt  this  would 
never  do:  the  slightest  hesitation  would  have  been  fatal  to  the 
incipient  treaty  of  peace.  I  rose  and  met  the  handkerchief  half- 
way, received  it  with  decorum,  wiped  therewith  my  eyes,  and, 
resuming  my  seat,  and  retaining  the  flag  of  truce  in  my  hand  and 
on  my  lap,  took  especial  care  during  the  remainder  of  the  lesson 
to  touch  neither  needle  nor  thimble,  scissors  nor  muslin.  Many  a 
jealous  glance  did  M.  Paul  cast  at  these  implements;  he  hated 
them  mortally,  considering  sewing  a  source  of  distraction  from  the 


302  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

attention  due  to  himself.  A  very  eloquent  lesson  he  gave,  and 
very  kind  and  friendly  was  he  to  the  close.  Ere  he  had  done,  the 
clouds  were  dispersed  and  the  sun  shining  out — tears  were  ex- 
changed for  smiles. 

Capricious,  whimsical,  subject  to  sudden  gusts  of 
irrational  anger,  Professor  Emanuel  had  the  faculty 
of  diffusing  an  immense  deal  of  discomfort  among  his 
fellow-creatures.  They  had  the  irritation — the  annoy- 
ance even  to  tears — of  the  stormy  gusts  ;  and  he 
reaped  the  advantage  of  finding  his  sunshine,  when 
he  chose  to  smile,  more  highly  prized,  more  sweetly 
felt,  than  if  no  bad  weather  had  preceded  it.  He 
could  be  kind;  his  heart  was  not  "  ossified;"  nay, 
"  in  its  core  was  a  place  tender  beyond  man's  tender- 
ness, a  place  that  humbled  him  to  little  children, 
that  bound  him  to  girls  and  women."  This  made 
amends  for  "  many  a  sharp  snap  and  savage  snarl." 
"  Naturally  a  little  man,  of  unreasonable  moods,"  he 
resembled  Napoleon  in  his  "  shameless  disregard  of 
magnanimity."  He  detested  learned  women.  A 
"  woman  of  intellect  "  was,  he  thought,  "  a  luckless 
accident,  a  thing  for  which  there  was  neither  place 
nor  use  in  creation,  wanted  neither  as  wife  nor 
worker."  He  was,  withal,  forgiving  to  the  van- 
quished, and  though  lacking  magnanimity  in  trifles, 
was  "great  in  great  things."  Sharing  Dr.  Johnson's 
capricious  temper,  he  was,  like  Johnson,  a  succourer 
of  poor  and  unpleasant  creatures  who  had  no  other 
friend,  and  had  on  hand  Mother  Walravens,  Father 
Silas,  Mrs.  Agnes,  "and  a  whole  troop  of  nameless 
paupers."  He  had  been  constant  to  a  youthful  love 


The  Bronte  Lovers.  303 

— "  one  grand  love,  born  so  strong  and  perfect,  that 
it  had  laughed  at  Death  himself,  despised  his  mean 
rape  of  matter,  clung  to  immortal  spirit,  and,  in 
victory  and  faith,  had  watched  beside  a  tomb  twenty 
years."  Why  is  it  that  all  the  heroes — all  the  admired 
men  and  accepted  lovers — of  Charlotte  Bronte  are 
choleric,  moody,  masterful,  and  are  obviously  felt  by 
her  to  be,  for  that  reason,  the  more  enchanting  ? 

The  tartness — to  use  a  somewhat  indefinite  term — 
of  Charlotte  Bronte's  lovers  is,  to  the  best  of  my  know- 
ledge, a  thing  peculiar  to  the  Bronte  genius.  Except 
Emily  and  Charlotte  Bronte  I  do  not  know  any  writer 
who  imputes  asperity  to  love-making  and  captivating 
gentlemen.  The  author  of  the  old  ballad,  Burd  Helen, 
whose  name  is,  I  suppose,  unknown,  occurs  to  me  as 
having  approached  the  Bronte  practice  more  clearly 
than  most,  and  Chaucer,  I  have  no  doubt,  could  have 
accurately  analysed  the  charm  of  Kochester's  impe- 
riousness,  and  shown  its  root  in  the  nature  and  social 
habits  of  women  and  of  men.  Helen  in  the  ballad  is 
atrociously  ill-used  by  her  lover,  being  forced  by  him 
to  follow  a-foot,  clinging  to  his  saddle-bow,  as  he  rides 
on  his  journey  by  moorland  waste  and  haggard  stone ; 
he  refuses  to  take  her  up,  but  lets  her  still  drag  on  at 
his  horse's  side,  even  when  they  must  ford  "  Clyde 
water,"  which  rolls  full  in  flood  "from  bank  to  brae." 
But  we  are  relieved,  or  half  relieved,  at  length,  by 
finding  that  he  has  only  been  testing  her  affection,  and 
that,  when  he  proves  it  sufficiently,  he  accepts  and 
returns  it.  Chaucer  represents  patient  Grisildis  as 


304  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 



suffering  exquisite  mental  torment  from  the  man  she 
loves,  yet  never  faltering  in  her  devotion.  But  Chaucer 
is  careful  to  announce  his  own  disapproval  of  Lord 
Walter's  conduct,  and  to  exhort  wives  not  to  be  so 
meek  as  Grisildis,  but  always  to  give  the  husband 
back  his  own  with  usury.  In  the  prenuptial  period, 
Lord  Walter  had  been  gentleness  itself. 

Probably  enough,  it  is  due  to  my  lack  of  information, 
but  I  cannot,  I  repeat,  recall  any  lover,  outside  the 
Bronte  books,  who,  in  the  time  of  courtship,  when 
desirous  of  presenting  himself  in  the  most  attractive 
guise  to  the  lady,  is  so  blunt  and  peremptory  as 
Kochester,  or  so  snappish  as  Paul  Emanuel.  In  Char- 
lotte's other  great  novel  she  adheres  to  her  practice. 
Both  Robert  Moore  and  Louis  Moore  in  Shirley  are 
stern,  commanding  men,  with  something  of  the  soldier, 
something  even  of  the  drill-sergeant,  in  them.  And 
Shirley  Keeldar  herself  has  the  Bronte  contempt  for 
soft  lovers.  "  Pah  !  "  she  says,  "  my  husband  is  not  to 
be  my  baby.  I  am  not  to  set  him  his  daily  lesson  and 
see  that  he  learns  it,  and  give  him  a  sugar-plum  if  he 
is  good,  and  a  patient,  pensive,  pathetic  lecture  if  he  is 
bad."  The  love-lorn  Louis  understood  the  woman  he 
had  to  deal  with.  "I  scared  her,"  he  remarks,  in 
describing  what  is  generally  held  to  be  the  delicate 
process  of  eliciting  from  a  lady  a  confession  of  affection. 
"  I  scared  her;  that  I  could  see;  it  was  right ;  she  must 
be  scared  to  be  won."  He  scared  her  so  effectually 
that  she  "  trembled."  The  more  she  trembled  the 
more  commanding  he  became.  "  My  pupil !  "  he  said. 


Amatory  Fence.  305 


"  My  master !"  she  replied  in  accents  fainter.  After 
one  or  two  other  passes  of  amatory  fence,  "  Am  I  to  die 
without  yon,"  he  cries,  "  or  am  I  to  live  for  you?" 
"  Do  as  you  please,"  she  answers ;  "far  be  it  from  me 
to  dictate  your  choice."  "  You  shall  tell  me  with  your 
own  lips,  whether  you  doom  me  to  exile,  or  call  me  to 
hope."  "  Go,  I  can  bear  to  be  left."  "  Perhaps,  I  too 
can  bear  to  leave  you  ;  but  reply,  Shirley,  my  pupil,  my 
sovereign — reply."  This  is  peremptory  enough,  so  she 
answers,  "Die  without  me,  if  you  will.  Live  for  me, 
if  you  dare."  Of  course  he  tells  her  that  he  dares  to 
be  her  accepted  lover,  addressing  her  by  the  endearing 
term  of  "leopardess."  "You  name  me  leopardess? 
remember  the  leopardess  is  tameless."  "  Tame  or 
fierce,"  he  answers,  "wild  or  subdued,  you  are  mine." 
"  I  am  glad  I  know  my  keeper,"  she  says,  with  the 
smile  of  acceptance  on  her  lip,  "  and  am  used  to  him. 
Only  his  voice  will  I  follow ;  only  his  hand  shall 
manage  me  ;  only  at  his  feet  will  I  repose." 

Neither  in  Shakespeare  nor  in  Goethe,  neither  in 
Schiller  nor  in  Byron,  neither  in  Fielding  nor  in 
Scott,  neither  in  Thackeray  nor  in  Dickens,  neither 
in  Mr.  Trollope  nor  in  George  Eliot,  do  I  find  acid 
mixed  with  sweetness  in  love-making  as  it  is  mixed 
in  the  love-making  of  the  Bronte  novels.  Heathcliff, 
in  his  boyish  time,  when  the  fine  and  manly  in- 
gredients in  his  nature  have  not  yet  become  malig- 
nant, is  a  rough  and  saucy  lover  ;  nor  would  the  wild, 
wayward,  witching  Cathy  have  endured  him  if  he  had 
been  a  soft  and  sighing  swain.  When  Shakespeare 

20 


306  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

introduces  Richard  the  Third  wooing  Anne,  an  ex- 
press opportunity  is  afforded  him  for  representing 
the  lady  as  impressed  by  the  hardness  of  Eichard's 
character,  and  as  influenced  by  the  force — even 
though  the  harsh  force — of  one  born  to  be  a  king. 
Had  Charlotte  Bronte  designed  and  executed  the 
scene,  she  would  certainly  have  made  Bichard  cast 
over  Anne  the  glamour  of  his  imperious  strength, 
and  shown  her  fluttering  into  his  arms  like  a  bird 
sinking  fascinated  into  the  jaws  of  a  snake.  Shake- 
speare's Bichard  is  subtle,  insinuating,  sophistical, 
wily,  but  he  studiously  disguises  his  harshness. 
King  Henry,  making  love  to  the  Princess  of  France, 
with  the  garlands  of  Agincourt  on  his  brow,  is  a  less 
masterful  lover  than  Louis  Moore  extorting  an  avowal 
of  regard  from  the  splendid  heiress  whose  tutor  he  has 
been.  Egmont  is  all  softness  to  Clarchen — Faust 
to  Margaret.  And  so  on  ad  infinitum. 

If  it  were  in  a  merely  whimsical  and  fantastic  spirit 
that  Charlotte  Bronte  assigned  to  her  lovers  a  gift  of 
government  and  faculty  of  sarcasm  distinguishing 
them  from  all  other  lovers, — if  they  were  extravagant 
or  untrue  to  nature  as  well  as  unique, — the  originality 
with  which  she  is  to  be  credited  on  their  account 
would  be  little  worth.  Stupidity,  affectation,  con- 
ceit, impudence,  strong  drink,  opium,  are  all  prolific 
sources  of  originality.  But  the  distinctive  charm  of 
the  acid  in  the  Bronte  love-making  is  connected  with 
broad  and  well-established  facts  of  human  nature,  and 
is  neither  fantastic  nor  far-fetched.  Amiability  is  apt 


Insipid  Amiability.  307 

to  be  insipid — is  always  insipid  when  it  is  monotonous 
and  constant.  Flavour  in  fruit  or  wine  is  hopelessly 
destroyed  by  excess  of  sweetness.  Smiling  innocence 
is  oftener  complimented  than  liked,  and  Byron — who, 
one  would  think,  had  never  suffered  much  from 
amiability,  whether  as  exhibited  by  himself  or  his 
friends  or  foes — expresses  sceptical  wonder  how  the 
grand  old  gardener  and  his  wife  could  have  found  it 
agreeable  in  Eden.  The  Bronte  sisters  had  an  excep- 
tionally keen  and  clear,  but  hardly  exaggerated,  per- 
ception of  this  general  fact.  Sugary  people  they  re- 
garded with  aversion — the  remark  is  illustrated  by 
their  delineation  of  pleasant  women  as  well  as  of 
pleasant  men ;  and  they  instinctively  shrank  from 
sugary  love-making.  Little  Jane,  Shirley,  and  Lucy 
Snowe  are  women  of  great  strength  of  character,  and 
Caroline  and  Polly  are  not  without  decision.  Mr. 
Lint  on' s  well-meaning  friendliness  does^  not  save  him 
from  Emily  Bronte's  scorn,  and  the  weak  Mr.  Symp- 
son  in  Shirley  is  the  most  despicable  of  all  Charlotte's 
characters.  Manliness,  intellectual  power,  caustic 
piquancy  of  conversation,  are  qualities  universally 
popular,  and  the  Bronte  sisters  discerned  that  they 
are  not  suspended,  and  do  not  cease  to  be  charming, 
though  people  are  in  love. 

But  there  is  a  still  more  specific  element  in  the  fasci- 
nation of  Rochester  and  his  peers  than  that  dependent 
on  the  general  interest  of  vigorous  and  pithy  character. 
Charlotte  Bronte  unmistakably  intends  that  a  sense  of 
the  dominance  and  control  exercised  by  her  lovers  shall 

20—2 


308  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

be  intensely  delightful  to  the  women  who  are  loved. 
There  is  no  term  of  endearment  applied  by  Jane  to 
Rochester  which  seems  to  have  so  exquisite  a  charm 
for  her  as  "  master."  Shirley,  the  proud,  rich,  wild, 
brilliant  Shirley,  exults,  as  we  saw,  in  the  thought 
that  she  has  found  her  "keeper,"  the  man  who  can 
"  manage  "  her.  A  deep  swell  of  hero-worshipping 
enthusiasm — an  enraptured  recognition  that  the  man 
worthy  to  be  a  woman's  lover  is  worthy  also  to  be  her 
lord — passes  through  the  whole  of  Charlotte  Bronte's 
writings.  Imbecility  in  the  form  of  a  man  is  indeed 
only  the  more  contemptible  for  having  degraded  the 
temple  it  usurps ;  but  a  man  of  true  nobility,  a  man 
whose  patent  is  stamped  by  Almighty  God,  is  for  her 
the  king  of  the  world.  "I  tell  you,"  exclaims  Shirley, 
"when  they  are  good,  they  are  the  lords  of  the  creation 
— they  are  the  sons  of  God.  Moulded  in  their 
Maker's  image,  the  minutest  spark  of  His  spirit  lifts 
them  almost  above  mortality.  Indisputably  a  great, 
good,  handsome  man  is  the  first  of  created  things." 
Keen  as  is  her  assertion  of  every  claim  that  she 
believes  capable  of  being  justly  preferred  on  behalf 
of  her  sex,  Charlotte  Bronte  has  not  a  shred  of 
sympathy  with  those  who  maintain  the  absolute 
equality  of  men  and  women.  This  cannot,  I  think, 
be  reasonably  disputed.  Not  only  are  we  made  to 
feel  that  Jane  and  Shirley  and  Lucy  Snowe  would 
be  defrauded  of  their  intensest  joy  in  loving  if  they 
did  not  feel  that  their  lovers  were  their  masters,  but 
we  are  expressly  informed,  through  the  lips  of  Shirley, 


Women's  Eights.  309 


when  Caroline  asks  her  whether  man  must  indeed  be 
acknowledged  woman's  superior,  that  such  is  Charlotte 
Bronte's  opinion.  "  I  would  scorn,"  Shirley  answers, 
"to  contend  for  empire  with  him.  I  would  scorn  it. 
Shall  my  left  hand  dispute  for  precedence  with  my 
right?  shall  my  heart  quarrel  with  my  pulse?  shall 
my  veins  be  jealous  of  the  blood  which  fills  them? 
.  .  .  .  Nothing  ever  charms  me  more  than  when 
I  meet  my  superior,  one  who  makes  me  sincerely  feel 
that  he  is  my  superior."  "Did  you  ever  meet  him ?  " 
asks  Caroline.  "  I  should  be  glad  to  see  him  any 
day,"  she  replies;  "the  higher  above  me,  so  much 
the  better ;  it  degrades  to  stoop,  it  is  glorious  to  look 
up."  When  Shirley  did  see  her  lover,  it  was  the  very 
elixir  of  her  joy  that  he  could  rule  her.  In  her  love, 
as  in  that  of  all  Charlotte  Bronte's  heroines,  there 
was  a  "delicious  pride,"  but  a  "more  delicious 
humility."  *  I  presume  that  the  ladies  and  gentle- 
men who  are  at  present  conspicuous  by  their  advocacy 
of  "  women's  rights  "  would  hesitate  to  admit  that 
their  contention  involves  a  denial  of  the  superiority 
assigned  to  men  by  Shirley;  but  I  believe  that  the 
main  drift  of  their  movement  is  practically  its  denial; 
and  I  hold  further  that,  though  all  the  enactments 
which  give  power  to  men  as  compared  with  women 
were  swept  from  the  Statute  Book — a  consummation 
to  which  I  should  offer  no  resistance — every  woman 
supremely  in  love  would,  all  the  same,  feel  the  crown 
of  her  joy  to  be  in  self-surrender.  Mrs.  Browning 
*  This  antithesis,  however,  is  not  quoted  from  Charlotte  Bronte. 


310  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

attests  this  as  well  as  Charlotte  Bronte.     It  is  woman 
who  is  addressed  in  the  words, — 

Thou  shalt  be  served  thyself  by  every  sense 
Of  service  which  thou  renderest. 

I  have  no  doubt,  however,  that  there  are  women 
whom  it  would  not  be  safe  to  woo  in  the  fashion  of 
the  Bronte  lovers — some  who  would  have  resented 
Kochester's  behaviour  if  he  had  ordered  them  about 
so  bluntly  as  he  ordered  Jane  Eyre,  and  who  would 
have  found  nothing  attractive  in  M.  Emanuel's 
irascibility  and  caprice. 


CHAPTEE   XIII. 

MB.  DONNE'S  EXODUS— SHIRLEY  THE  AUTHOR'S 
MOST  CHARACTERISTIC  BOOK  — ROBERT'S 
PROPOSAL— MERCENARY  MARRIAGE— A  DAY 
WITH  SHIRLEY  —  LANDSCAPE  GLIMPSES  — 
THE  DUTY  OF  ENDURANCE. 

TjINTEETAINING  for  great  and  good  men  an 
I  J  impassioned  and  frankly  expressed  admiration, 
Charlotte  Bronte  treats  feeble  and  bad  men  with 
unrelenting  scorn,  and  shows  us,  in  an  entirely 
characteristic  passage,  how,  in  her  opinion,  a  spirited 
Yorkshire  girl  might  put  down  a  coarse  and  self- 
obtruding  clergyman.  The  occurrence  described  took 
place  in  the  grounds  of  Fieldhead,  Miss  Keeldar's 
residence.  The  Kev.  Mr.  Donne  is  the  first  speaker. 

"  Ahem ! "  he  began,  clearing  his  throat  evidently  for  a  speech 
of  some  importance.  "  Ahem !  Miss  Keeldar,  your  attention  an 
instant,  if  you  please.'3  "Well,"  said  Shirley,  nonchalantly, 
"what  is  it?  I  listen:  all  of  me  is  ear  that  is  not  eye."  "I 
hope  part  of  you  is  hand  also,"  returned  Donne,  in  his  vulgarly 
presumptuous  and  familiar  style,  "and  part  purse:  it  is  to  the 
hand  and  purse  I  propose  to  appeal.  I  came  here  this  morning 

with  a  view  to  beg  of  you "     "You  should  have  gone  to  Mrs. 

Gill ;  she  is  my  almoner."        "  To  beg  of  you  a  subscription  to  a 


312  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

school.  I  and  Dr.  Boultby  intend  to  erect  one  in  the  hamlet  of 
Ecclefigg,  which  is  under  our  vicarage  of  Whinbury.  The  Baptists 
have  got  possession  of  it ;  they  have  a  chapel  there,  and  we  want 
to  dispute  the  ground."  "  But  f  have  nothing  to  do  with  Eccle- 
figg :  I  possess  no  property  there."  "What  does  that  signify? 
You're  a  Churchwoman,  ain't  you?"  "Admirable  creature!" 
muttered  Shirley,  under  her  breath;  "exquisite  address!  fine 
style  !  What  raptures  he  excites  in  me !  "  Then  aloud,  "  I  am 
a  Churchwoman,  certainly."  "Then  you  can't  refuse  to  contribute 
in  this  case.  The  population  of  Ecclefigg  are  a  parcel  of  brutes — 
we  want  to  civilize  them."  "  Who  is  to  be  the  missionary  ?  " 
"  Myself,  probably."  "  You  won't  fail  through  lack  of  sympathy 
with  your  flock."  "I  hope  not — I  expect  success;  but  we  must 
have  money.  There  is  the  paper — pray  give  a  handsome  sum." 

When  asked  for  money,  Shirley  rarely  held  back.  She  put 
down  her  name  for  £5.  After  the  ,£300  she  had  lately  given,  and 
the  many  smaller  sums  she  was  giving  constantly,  it  was  as  much 
as  she  could  at  present  afford.  Donne  looked  at  it,  declared  the 
subscription  "  shabby,"  and  clamorously  demanded  more.  Miss 
Keeldar  flushed  up  with  some  indignation  and  more  astonishment. 
"  At  present,  I  shall  give  no  more,"  said  she.  "  Not  give  more  ? 
Why,  I  expected  you  to  head  the  list  with  a  cool  hundred.  With 
your  property,  you  should  never  put  down  a  signature  for  less." 
She  was  silent.  "  In  the  south,"  went  on  Donne,  "  a  lady  with  a 
thousand  a-year  would  be  ashamed  to  give  £5  for  a  public  object." 
Shirley,  so  rarely  haughty,  looked  so  now.  Her  slight  frame 
became  nerved ;  her  distinguished  face  quickened  with  scorn. 
"Strange  remarks!"  said  she;  "most  inconsiderate!  Reproach 
in  return  for  bounty  is  misplaced."  "Bounty  !  Do  you  call  five 
pounds  bounty  ?  "  "  I  do  ;  and  bounty  which,  had  I  not  given  it 
to  Mr.  Boultby's  intended  school,  of  the  erection  of  which  I 
approve,  and  in  no  sort  to  his  curate,  who  seems  ill-advised  in 
his  manner  of  applying  for,  or  rather  extorting,  subscriptions — 
bounty,  I  repeat,  which,  but  for  this  consideration,  I  should 
instantly  reclaim." 

Donne  was  thick-skinned ;  he  did  not  feel  all  or  half  that  the 
tone,  air,  glance  of  the  speaker  expressed ;  he  knew  not  on  what 
ground  he  stood.  "  Wretched  place — this  Yorkshire,"  he  went  on. 
"  I  could  never  have  formed  an  idear  of  the  country  had  I  not 
seen  it ;  and  the  people — rich  and  poor — what  a  set !  How  corse 
and  uncultivated  !  They  would  be  scouted  in  the  south."  Shirley 


Mr.  Donne  s  Exodus.  313 

leaned  forwards  on  the  table,  her  nostrils  dilating  a  little,  her  taper 
fingers  interlaced  and  compressing  each  other  hard.  "  The  rich," 
pursued  the  infatuated  and  unconscious  Donne,  "  are  a  parcel  of 
misers — never  living  as  persons  with  their  incomes  ought  to  live  : 
you  scarsely — (you  must  excuse  Mr.  Donne's  pronunciation,  reader ; 
it  was  very  choice ;  he  considered  it  genteel,  and  prided  himself  on 
his  southern  accent ;  -northern  ears  received  with  singular  sensa- 
tions his  utterance  of  certain  words) — you  scarsely  ever  see  a 
i'am'ly  where  a  propa  carriage  or  a  regla  butla  is  kep ;  and  as  to 
the  poor — just  look  at  them  when  they  come  crowding  about  the 
church-doors  on  the  occasion  of  a  marriage  or  a  funeral,  clattering 
in  clogs ;  the  men  in  their  shirt-sleeves  and  wool-combers'  aprons, 
the  women  in  mob-caps  and  bedgowns.  They  pos'tively  deserve 
that  one  should  turn  a  mad  cow  in  amongst  them  to  rout  their 
rabble-ranks—he  !  he  I  What  fun  it  would  be  !  " 

"  There,  you  have  reached  the  climax,"  said  Shirley  quietly. 
"You  have  reached  the  climax,"  she  repeated,  turning  her  glowing 
glance  towards  him.  "You  cannot  go  beyond  it;  and,"  she 
added  with  emphasis,  "  you  shall  not,  in  my  house."  Up  she 
rose.  Nobody  could  control  her  now,  for  she  was  exasperated. 
Straight  she  walked  to  her  garden  gates,  wide  she  flung  them 
open.  "  Walk  through,"  she  said,  austerely,  "  and  pretty  quickly, 
and  set  foot  on  this  pavement  no  more."  Donne  was  astounded. 
He  had  thought  all  the  time  he  was  showing  himself  off  to  high 
advantage,  as  a  lofty-souled  person  of  the  first  ton;  he  imagined 
he  was  producing  a  crushing  impression.  Had  he  not  expressed 
disdain  of  everything  in  Yorkshire  ?  What  more  conclusive  proof 
could  be  given  that  he  was  better  than  anything  there  ?  And  yet 
here  he  was  about  to  be  turned  like  a  dog  out  of  a  Yorkshire 
garden!  Where,  under  such  circumstances,  was  the  "concaten- 
ation accordingly"?  "Bid  me  of  you  instantly — instantly!" 
reiterated  Shirley,  as  he  lingered.  "  Madam — a  clergyman ! 
Turn  out  a  clergyman?"  "Off!  Were  you  an  archbishop, 
you  have  proved  yourself  no  gentleman,  and  must  go.  Quick ! " 
She  was  quite  resolved  ;  there  was  no  trifling  with  her.  Besides, 
Tartar  was  again  rising  ;  he  perceived  symptoms  of  a  commotion ; 
he  manifested  a  disposition  to  join  in.  There  was  evidently 
nothing  for  it  but  to  go,  and  Donne  made  his  exodus,  the  heiress 
sweeping  him  a  deep  curtsey  as  she  closed  the  gates  on  him. 

The  book,  Shirley,  from  which  this  admirable  piece 


314  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

of  life-comedy  is  taken,  though  not  marked  by  the 
sustained  intensity  of  imaginative  power  which  cha- 
racterises the  central  portion  of  Jane  Eyre,  is  in  some 
respects  the  finest  of  all  Charlotte  Bronte's  novels. 
There  is  more  ease  in  it — more  freedom  and  variety — 
than  in  Jane  Eyre,  and  it  is  less  laborious  and  didactic 
than  Villette.  In  none  of  Charlotte  Bronte's  books 
are  there  more  fresh  and  lovely  glimpses  of  landscape  ; 
and  the  heroines,  Shirley  and  Caroline,  so  felicitously 
contrasted,  so  finely  harmonised,  so  perfectly  life-like, 
are  embodiments  of  the  pride  and  love  with  which  she 
regarded  the  girls  of  England  and,  above  all,  the  girls 
of  Yorkshire. 

In  Shirley  we  see  Charlotte  Bronte  in  her  ordinary 
mood,  the  mood  in  which  she  most  broadly,  simply, 
unconstrainedly  reveals  herself.  Her  genius  shows  its 
strength  most  decisively  in  Jane  Eyre.  Her  most 
mature  philosophy  and  her  most  carefully  elaborated 
style  are  to  be  found  in  Villette.  The  former  was 
written  under  high  pressure,  her  feelings  greatly 
excited,  her  genius  making  its  critical,  dead-lift 
attempt  to  establish  a  reputation ;  the  latter  was 
also  composed  with  conscious,  painful  effort,  under 
a  sense  of  duty.  Shirley  was  written  under  more 
ordinary  circumstances,  in  the  natural  outflow  of 
sympathy  and  imagination.  The  shadow  of  death 
falls  upon  the  page  at  the  beginning  of  the  third 
volume,  written  when  the  grave  had  just  closed 
upon  Emily  and  Anne ;  but  the  spirit  of  the  book 
is  cheerful.  Upon  none  of  her  characters  does 


Shirley.  315 


Charlotte  Bronte  lavish,  such  glad  enthusiasm  as 
upon  Shirley  Keeldar  and  Caroline  Helstone.  They 
are  English  girls,  and  Charlotte  Bronte,  having  lived 
in  a  Continental  school,  cherished  a  firm  persuasion 
of  the  superior  worth  and  attractiveness  of  the  girls 
of  England.  They  are  Yorkshire  girls,  and  Charlotte 
Bronte,  though  she  loved  England  well,  loved  York- 
shire better,  and  was  almost  fiercely  proud  of  the 
stalwart  lads  and  brave  and  bonny  lasses  of  the  dales 
and  moors.  There  is  also,  to  my  thinking,  a  natural 
fitness  in  the  circumstance  that,  in  a  woman's  novel, 
the  chief  part  among  the  characters  is  played  by 
women.  Rochester  might  have  given  his  name  to 
the  book  in  which  he  figures  almost  as  well  as  the 
little  governess  ;  but  neither  of  the  Moores  is  half  so 
prominent  in  the  Shirley  group  of  personages  as 
Shirley  herself.  Louis  Moore,  who  holds  technically 
the  place  of  hero  as  the  accepted  lover  of  the  heroine, 
is  hardly  heard  of  until  the  third  volume ;  and  his 
brother  Kobert,  though  we  see  him  sooner,  stands 
third  in  the  order  of  interest,  Shirley  and  Caroline 
being  first  and  second.  Women,  though  they  may 
write  passionately  and  splendidly  about  men,  write, 
nevertheless,  most  congenially,  and  with  greatest 
reality  and  accuracy  of  knowledge,  about  women. 
There  is,  accordingly,  I  repeat,  more  ease  in  Shirley, 
more  free  and  natural  and  brilliant  play  of  the 
author's  faculties,  than  in  her  other  books.  In  it,  also, 
more  than  elsewhere,  have  we  her  idea  of  women's 
rights  and  wrongs.  It  was  published  about  eighteen 
months  after  Jane  Eyre. 


316  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

There  is  almost  no  plot,  but  the  story  is  sufficiently 
well  planned  to  secure  for  the  reader  the  interest  of 
mild  surprise.  The  question — all-important  from  the 
novelist's  specific  point  of  view — who  is  to  marry  the 
heroine,  is  made  adequately  perplexing  throughout  the 
first  and  second  volumes.  Every  one  supposes  that 
Kobert — also  called  Gerard — Moore  will  marry  Shir- 
ley, and  yet  no  unfair  means  are  made  use  of  to 
convey  that  impression  to  the  reader.  Nothing  could 
be  more  natural,  yet  nothing  more  dramatic,  than  the 
interview  between  Kobert  and  Shirley,  witnessed  by 
Caroline  ;  and  Robert's  account  to  his  friend  Yorke  of 
his  proposal  to  Shirley  is  quite  masterly,  alike  in  in- 
vention, in  humour,  in  truth  to  human  nature  in 
general,  and  in  exactitude  of  correspondence  with 
the  characters  of  Moore  and  of  Shirley  in  particular. 
The  passage,  however,  must  be  read  to  be  appreciated. 
I  abridge  some  of  the  sentences,  yet  it  is  so  long  that 
I  can  quote  but  part. 

"Yorke,  if  I  got  off  horseback,  and  laid  myself  down  across  the 
road,  would  you  have  the  goodness  to  gallop  over  me — backwards 
and  forwards  about  twenty  times  ?  "  "  Wi'  all  the  pleasure  in  life, 
if  there  were  no  such  thing  as  a  coroner's  inquest."  "  Hiram 
Yorke,  I  certainly  believed  she  loved  me.  I  have  seen  her  eyes 
sparkle  radiantly  when  she  has  found  me  out  in  a  crowd  ;  she  has 
flushed  up  crimson  when  she  has  offered  me  her  hand,  and  said, 
'  How  do  you  do,  Mr.  Moore  ? '  My  name  had  a  magical  influence 
over  her  ;  when  others  uttered  it  she  changed  countenance — I 
know  she  did.  She  pronounced  it  herself  in  the  most  musical  of 
her  many  musical  tones.  She  was  cordial  to  me;  she  took  an 
interest  in  me  ;  she  was  anxious  about  me  ;  she  wished  me  well  j 
she  sought,  she  seized  every  opportunity  to  benefit  me.  I  con- 
sidered, paused,  watched,  weighed,  wondered ;  I  could  come  to  but 
one  conclusion — this  is  love.  I  looked  at  her,  Yorke  ;  I  saw  in  her 


Bobert's  Proposal.  317 

youth  and  a  species  of  beauty.  I  saw  power  in  her.  Her  wealth 
offered  me  the  redemption  of  my  honour  and  my  standing.  I  owed 
her  gratitude.  Young,  graceful,  gracious — my  benefactress,  at- 
tached to  me,  enamoured  of  me — I  used  to  say  so  to  myself;  dwell 
on  the  word ;  mouth  it  over  and  over  again  ;  swell  over  it  with  a 
pleasant,  pompous  complacency — with  an  admiration  dedicated 
entirely  to  myself,  and  unimpaired  even  by  esteem  for  her ;  indeed, 
I  smiled  in  deep  secrecy  at  her  na'ivete  and  simplicity,  in  being  the 
first  to  love,  and  to  show  it.  That  whip  of  yours  seems  to  have  a 
good  heavy  handle,  Yorke  ;  you  can  swing  it  about  your  head,  and 
knock  me  out  of  the  saddle,  if  you  choose.  I  should  rather  relish 
a  loundering  whack." 

"  Tak'  patience,  Robert,  till  the  moon  rises,  and  I  can  see  you. 
Speak  plain  out ; — did  you  love  her  or  not  ?  I  should  like  to 
know;  I  feel  curious."  "Sir — sir — I  say — she  is  very  pretty,  in 
her  own  style,  and  very  attractive.  She  has  a  look,  at  times,  of  a 
thing  made  out  of  fire  and  air,  at  which  I  stand  and  marvel,  with- 
out a  thought  of  clasping  and  kissing  it.  I  felt  in  her  a  powerful 
magnet  to  my  interest  and  vanity  :  I  never  felt  as  if  nature  meant 
her  to  be  my  other  and  better  self.  When  a  question  on  that  head 
rushed  upon  me  I  flung  it  off,  saying  brutally,  I  should  be  rich 
with  her,  and  ruined  without  her ;  vowing  I  would  be  practical, 
and  not  romantic."  "  A  very  sensible  resolve  !  What  mischief 
came  of  it,  Bob  ?  " 

"With  this  sensible  resolve,  I  walked  up  to  Fieldhead  one 
night  last  August  :  it  was  the  very  eve  of  my  departure 
for  Birmingham, — for — you  see — I  wanted  to  secure  fortune's 
splendid  prize :  I  had  previously  dispatched  a  note,  request- 
ing a  private  interview.  I  found  her  at  home,  and  alone. 
She  received  me  without  embarrassment,  for  she  thought  I  came 
on  business  ;  I  was  embarrassed  enough,  but  determined.  I  hardly 
know  how  I  got  the  operation  over ;  but  I  went  to  work  in  a  hard, 
firm  fashion, — frightful  enough,  I  daresay.  I  sternly  offered  my- 
self— my  fine  person — with  my  debts,  of  course,  as  a  settlement. 
It  vexed  me ;  it  kindled  my  ire,  to  find  that  she  neither  blushed, 
trembled,  nor  looked  down.  She  responded  :  '  I  doubt  whether  I 
have  understood  you,  Mr.  Moore.'  And  I  had  to  go  over  the 
whole  proposal  twice,  and  word  it  as  plainly  as  A  B  C,  before  she 
would  fully  take  it  in.  And  then,  what  did  she  do  ?  Instead  of 
faltering  a  sweet  Yes,  or  maintaining  a  soft,  confused  silence 


318  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

(which  would  have  been  as  good),  she  started  up,  walked  twice 
fast  through  the  room,  in  the  way  that  she  only  does,  and  no  other 
woman,  and  ejaculated,  '  God  bless  me ! '  Yorke,  I  stood  on  the 
hearth,  backed  by  the  mantelpiece  ;  against  it  I  leaned,  and  pre- 
pared for  anything — everything.  I  knew  my  doom,  and  I  knew 
myself.  She  stopped  and  looked  at  me.  '  God  bless  me  !  '  she 
pitilessly  repeated,  in  that  shocked,  indignant,  yet  saddened 
accent.  'You  have  made  a  strange  proposal — strange  from  you; 
and  if  you  knew  how  strangely  you  worded  it,  and  looked  it,  you 
would  be  startled  at  yourself.  You  spoke  like  a  brigand  who 
demanded  my  purse,  rather  than  like  a  lover  who  asked  my  heart.' 
I  looked  at  her,  dumb  and  wolfish:  she  at  once  enraged  and 
shamed  me.  '  Gerard  Moore,  you  know  you  don't  love  Shirley 
Keeldar.'  I  might  have  broken  out  into  false  -  swearing ;  vowed 
that  I  did  love  her  ;  but  I  could  not  lie  in  her  pure  face  Besides, 
such  hollow  oaths  would  have  been  vain  as  void :  her  female  heart 
had  finer  perceptions  than  to  be  cheated  into  mistaking  my  half- 
coarse,  half-cold  admiration,  for  true-throbbing,  manly  love. 
'  What  next  happened  ? '  you  will  say,  Mr.  Yorke.  Why,  she 
sat  down  in  the  window-seat,  and  cried.  She  cried  passionately  : 
her  eyes  not  only  rained,  but  lightened.  They  flashed,  open, 
large,  dark,  haughty,  upon  me  :  they  said — '  You  have  pained  me  ; 

you  have  outraged  me  ;  you  have  deceived  me You — 

once  high  in  my  esteem — are  hurled  down ;  you — once  intimate  in 
my  friendship — are  cast  out.  Go  !  " 

Do  we  not  fee],  as  we  read,  that  this  passage  was 
written  with  all  Charlotte  Bronte's  heart,  and  not  only 
with  all  her  heart,  but  with  all  her  conscience  ?  She 
lived  much  in  the  sense  of  duty,  and  no  part  of  her 
duty  as  a  novelist  did  she  more  vividly  conceive,  or 
more  fervently  grasp,  than  that  of  guarding  the  sacred- 
ness  of  passion.  True  affection  was  in  her  view  an 
indispensable  element  in  the  right  formation  of  the 
marriage  tie;  and  her  frame  quivered  with  indignation, 
her  pen  emitted  lightnings,  when  selfishness  and 
worldliness  tried  to  pass  off  some  desecrating  sem- 


Mercenary  Marriage.  319 

blance  of  true  love  for  the  genuine  feeling.  With, 
intense  emphasis  she  would  have  echoed  Tennyson's 
anathema  on  "  the  social  lies  that  warp  us  from  the 
living  truth."  And  it  was  a  great  occasion  for  her 
when  she  could  punish  the  hypocrisy  that  mimicked 
love,  in  the  person  of  Robert  Moore,  an  able,  success- 
ful, upright  man,  quite  as  high-minded  as  the  average 
of  his  sex,  and  hardly  conscious  that,  with  his  trades- 
man's instinct,  he  was  perverting  and  profaning,  in  his 
proposal  to  Shirley,  the  very  idea  of  marriage.  Char- 
lotte had  inherited  from  her  father  a  jealousy  of  the 
trading  fraternity.  She  thought  that,  in  the  French 
war,  if  the  landed  gentry  had  allowed  them,  the 
merchants  of  England  would  have  sold  her  honour  for 
an  extension  of  their  markets.  "  During  the  late  war  " 
— these  are  her  words — "  the  tradesmen  of  England 
would  have  endured  buffets  from  the  French  on  the 
right  cheek  and  on  the  left ;  their  cloak  they  would 
have  given  to  Napoleon,  and  then  have  politely  offered 
him  their  coat  also,  nor  would  they  have  withheld 
their  waistcoat  if  urged ;  they  would  have  prayed 
permission  only  to  retain  their  one  other  garment,  for 
the  sake  of  the  purse  in  its  pocket."  We  need  not  in- 
quire whether  this  censure  is  altogether  Justin  an  histo- 
rical point  of  view  ;  Charlotte  Bronte  was,  at  all  events, 
right  in  sharply  resenting  the  intrusion  of  mercantile 
calculation  into  the  sphere  and  function  of  the  affections. 
It  is,  perhaps,  worthy  of  remark — though  the  matter 
is  not  of  much  moment — that,  at  the  time  when  she 
wrote  Shirley,  Charlotte  Bronte  was  timorously 


320  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

anxious  to  disguise  the  fact  that  she  was  a  woman. 
Some  of  the  rugged  strength,  verging  on  coarseness, 
in  the  conversation  between  Moore  and  Yorke,  may 
have  heen  intended  to  countenance  the  notion  that 
Currer  Bell  was  a  man.  But  if  this  motive  was 
present  with  her,  it  did  not  drive  her  to  extravagance  ; 
possibly  it  may  have  assisted  her  in  sympathetically 
realising  how  a  man  would  feel  under  the  circum- 
stances described  by  Moore.  In  that  invitation  of 
Moore's  to  Yorke  to  give  him  a  loundering  whack  with 
his  whip,  there  is  a  subtly  imaginative,  a  veritably 
Shakespearian,  penetration  into  the  feelings  of  a  proud 
man  who  has  made  an  immense  fool  of  himself.  The 
power  displayed  in  the  whole  passage  strikes  me  as 
amazing.  I  know  no  woman  novelist,  not  even  George 
Eliot,  who  has  quite  equalled  it;  and  yet  George  Eliot, 
as  she  shows  in  such  a  passage  as  that  describing  the 
fight  between  the  young  squire  and  Adam  Bede,  can 
see  very  far  into  the  heart  of  the  male  creature. 

But  the  view  presented  of  Shirley  Keeldar  in  this 
passage  may  convey  to  the  reader  a  one-sided  idea  of 
her  character.  Capable  she  indeed  was  of  scorn  and 
severity,  but  she  was  not  without  more  maidenly 
qualities.  Let  us  look  at  her  in  a  softer  aspect. 

She  takes  her  sewing  occasionally ;  but,  by  some  fatality,  she  is 
doomed  never  to  sit  steadily  at  it  for  above  five  minutes  at  a 
time.  Her  thimble  is  scarcely  fitted  on,  her  needle  scarce 
threaded,  when  a  sudden  thought  calls  her  upstairs.  Perhaps 
she  goes  to  seek  some  just-then-remembered  old  ivory-backed 
needle-book,  or  older  china-topped  workbox,  quite  unneeded,  but 
which  seems  at  the  moment  indispensable  ;  perhaps  to  arrange  her 


A  Day  with  Shirley.  321 

hair,  or  a  drawer  which  she  recollects  to  have  seen  that  morning 
in  a  state  of  curious  confusion  ;  perhaps  only  to  take  a  peep  from  a 
particular  window  at  a  particular  view,  whence  Briarfield  Church 
and  Kectory  are  visible,  pleasantly  bowered  in  trees.     She  has 
scarcely  returned,   and  again  taken  up   the   slip  of  cambric   or 
square  of  half-wrought  canvas,   when   Tartar's  bold  scrape  and 
strangled  whistle  are  heard  at  the  porch  door,  and  she  must  run  to 
open  it  for  him.     It  is  a  hot  day  ;  he  comes  in  panting.     She  must 
convey  him  to  the  kitchen,  and  see  with  her  own  eyes  that  his 
water-bowl  is  replenished.     Through  the  open  kitchen  door  the 
court  is  visible,  all  sunny  and  gay,  and  peopled  with  turkeys  and 
their  poults,  peahens  and  their  chicks,  pearl-flecked  guinea  fowls, 
and  a  bright  variety  of  pure-white,  and  purple-necked,  and  blue 
and  cinnamon -plumed  pigeons.     Irresistible  spectacle  to  Shirley  ! 
She  runs  to  the  pantiy  for  a  roll,  and  she  stands  on  the  door- step 
scattering  crumbs.     Around  her  throng  her  eager,  plump,  happy, 
feathered  vassals.     John  is  about  the  stables,  and  John  must  be 
talked  to,  and  her  mare  looked  at.     She  is  still  petting  and  patting 
it,   when  the  cows  comes  in  to  be  milked ;   this  is  important ; 
Shirley  must  stay  and  take  a  review  of  them  all.     There   are, 
perhaps,  some  little  calves,  some  little  new-yeaned  lambs — it  may 
be  twins,  whose  mothers  have  rejected  them.  Miss  Keeldar  must  be 
introduced  to  them  by  John — must  permit  herself  the  treat  of  feed- 
ing them  with  her  own  hand,  under  the  direction  of  her  careful  foot- 
man. Meantime,  John  moots  doubtful  questions  about  the  farming 
of  certain  "  crofts,"  and  "  ings,"  and  "  holms,"  and  his  mistress  is 
necessitated  to  fetch  her  garden-hat — a  gipsy-straw — and  accompany 
him,  over  stile  and  along  hedge-row,  to  hear  the  conclusion  of  the 
whole  agricultural  matter  on  the  spot,  and  with  the  said  "  crofts," 
"  ings,"  and  "  holms  "  under  her  eye.    Bright  afternoon  thus  wears 
into  soft  evening,  and  she  comes  home  to  a  late  tea,  and  after  tea 
she  never  sews.     After  tea  Shirley  reads,  and  she  is  just  about  as 
tenacious  of  her  book  as  she  is  lax  of  her  needle.    Her  study  is  the 
rug,  her  seat   a  footstool,   or  perhaps    only  the  carpet  at  Mrs. 
Prior's  feet ;  there  she  always  learned  her  lessons  when  a  child, 
and  old  habits  have  a  strong  power  over  her.    The  tawny  and  lion- 
like  bulk  of  Tartar  is  ever  stretched  beside  her  ;  his  negro  muzzle 
laid  on  his  fore  paws,  straight,  strong,  and  shapely,  as  the  limbs  of 
an  Alpine  wolf.    One  hand  of  the  mistress  generally  reposes  on  the 
loving  serf's  rude  head,  because  if  she  takes  it  away  he  groans  and 
is  discontented. 

21 


322  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 


Caroline  Helstone  is  more  regularly  beautiful  and 
more  nearly  common-place  than  Shirley.  Every  curve 
in  her  girlish  figure  is  graceful,  her  skin  delicate  and 
of  lovely  colour ;  her  brown  hair  falls  about  her  neck  in 
picturesque  profusion,  her  fine  eyes  are  "  gifted  at 
times  with  a  winning  beam  that  stole  into  the  heart, 
with  a  language  that  spoke  softly  to  the  affections." 
Intelligent  and  gentle,  she  was  no  sooner  known  than 
liked  by  the  more  sprightly  heiress,  and  an  intimate 
friendship  grew  up  between  them.  In  their  talks,  they 
furnish  Charlotte  Bronte  with  an  opportunity  for  airing 
her  opinions  upon  various  questions,  chiefly  that  of 
the  social  position,  duties,  claims,  and  sufferings  of 
women;  in  their  walks,  they  lend  her  occasion  for 
introducing  those  landscape  glimpses  which  greatly 
enhance  the  charm  of  the  novel.  "  Glimpses  "  they 
are  rather  than  elaborate  views — hence  perhaps  some 
part  of  their  fascination ;  we  catch  sight  of  them  as  we 
pass,  wishing  always  at  the  moment  that  we  could  see 
more  of  them,  yet  aware  that  the  novelist  does  well 
to  keep  her  word-pictures  strictly  subordinate  to  her 
story.  The  girls  agree  upon  it  that  "  England  is  a 
bonny  island,"  and  that  "Yorkshire  is  one  of  her 
bonniest  nooks."  When  they  halt  on  the  brow  of  the 
Common,  we  peep  over  their  shoulders  and  look  down 
"  on  the  deep  valley  robed  in  May  raiment ;  on  varied 
meads,  some  pearled  with  daisies,  and  some  golden 
with  king-cups."  The  spring  verdure  smiled  in  clear 
sunlight,  emerald  and  amber  gleams  playing  over  it. 
"  On  Nunnwood— the  sole  remnant  of  antique  British 


Landscape  Glimpses.  323 


forest  in  a  region  whose  lowlands  were  once  all  sylvan 
chase,   as  its  highlands  were   breast-deep   heather — 
slept  the  shadow  of  a  cloud ;  the  distant  hills  were 
dappled,    the    horizon   was   shaded    and    tinted   like 
mother-of-pearl ;   silvery  blues,   soft  purples,  evanes- 
_cent  greens  and  rose-shades,  all  melting  into  fleeces  of 
white  cloud,  pure  as  azury  snow,  allured  the  eye  as 
with    a  remote    glimpse    of   heaven's   foundations." 
Caroline  promises  to  take  Shirley  into  the  pleasantest 
places  in  the  old  forest.     "  I  know  where  wild  straw- 
berries abound;  I  know  certain  lonely,  quite  untrodden 
glades,  carpeted  with  strange  mosses,  some  yellow  as 
if  gilded,  some  a  sober  gray,  some  gem-green.    I  know 
groups  of  trees  that  ravish  the  eye  with  their  perfect, 
picture-like  effects  :   rude   oak,  delicate  birch,  glossy 
beech,  clustered  in  contrast ;  and  ash  trees  stately  as 
Saul,   standing    isolated,    and    superannuated   wood- 
giants  clad  in  bright  shrouds   of  ivy."     Do  not  the 
words  gleam  like  jewellery,  set  in  silver  and  fine  gold? 
Almost  invariably  these  limnings  from  Nature  are 
as  remarkable  for  fidelity  as  for  beauty.    In  fact,  I  can 
recall  but  one  instance  in  which  I  doubt  the  correct- 
ness of  the  delineation.     It  occurs  in  the  following 
sentence,  descriptive  of  moonlight.     "  Tree  and  hall 
rose  peaceful  under  the  night  sky  and  clear  full  orb  ; 
pearly  paleness  gilded  the  building;   mellow  brown 
gloom   bosomed    it   round ;   shadows  of    deep    green 
brooded  above  its  oak- wreathed  roof."     So  far  as  my 
own  observation — and  it  has  been  somewhat  careful — 
enables  me  to  speak,  moonlight  shows  no  colour  except 

21—2 


324  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

in  the  sky.  Wet  roofs  gleam  brightly  in  strong  moon- 
shine, but  no  shadow  cast  by  the  moon  can  be  discri- 
minated as  green.  It  is  perhaps  legitimate,  how- 
ever, for  the  word-painter  to  derive  more  colour  from 
association  of  ideas  than  the  painter  with  pigments 
can  dare  to  transfer  from  palette  to  canvas.  Generally 
speaking,  Charlotte  Bronte's  descriptions  are  photo- 
graphically and  more  than  photographically,  to  wit 
sympathetically  and  lovingly,  correct.  "  It  was  a 
peaceful  autumn  day.  The  gilding  of  the  Indian 
summer  mellowed  the  pastures  far  and  wide.  The 
russet  woods  stood  ripe  to  be  stripped,  but  were  yet 
full  of  leaf.  The  purple  of  heath-bloom,  faded  but  not 
withered,  tinged  the  hills'.  The  beck  wandered  down 
to  the  hollow,  through  a  silent  district ;  no  wind 
followed  its  course,  or  haunted  its  woody  borders. 
Fieldhead  gardens  bore  the  seal  of  gentle  decay.  On 
the  walks,  swept  that  morning,  yellow  leaves  had 
fluttered  down  again.  Its  time  of  flowers,  and  even  of 
fruits,  was  over;  but  a  scantling  of  apples  enriched  the 
trees ;  only  a  blossom  here  and  there,  expanded  pale 
and  delicate  amidst  a  knot  of  faded  leaves."  Miss 
Martineau  speaks  of  Wilson's  descriptions  as  bringing 
the  scents  of  the  moorland  into  the  sick-room  ;  I  can 
aver  that  the  preceding  words,  at  that  particular  point 
where  the  scantling  of  apples  and  the  blossoms  linger- 
ing here  and  there  among  the  leaves  are  mentioned, 
have  produced  in  me  what  seemed  the  actual  physical 
sensation  of  being  in  a  country  garden  amid  faint  scents 
of  apples.  References  abound  in  Shirley  to  the  wind, 


The  Duty  of  Endurance.  325 

whether  the  storm  wailing  and  raging  about  the  hall 
at  midnight,  or  the  gale  filling  the  vault  of  the  clear 
moonlit  sky  with  silver-hued,  swift-sailing  clouds. 
11  No  Endymion  will  watch  for  his  goddess  to-night : 
there  are  no  flocks  out  on  the  mountains ;  and  it  is 
well,  for  to-night  she  welcomes  ^Eolus." 

There  is  a  great  deal  of  ethical  teaching  in  this 
book;  but  it  is  thrown  in  so  skilfully  that,  like  the 
descriptions  of  scenery,  it  never  suggests  the  idea  of 
padding.  The  main  precept  which,  here  and  else- 
where, Charlotte  enforces,  is  that  of  entire,  unques- 
tioning submission  to  the  inevitable.  The  Arabian 
prophet  was  not  more  sternly  resolute  in  enjoining 
submission  to  fate.  "  Take  the  matter  as  you  find  it. 
Ask  no  questions  ;  utter  no  remonstrances.  It  is  your 
best  wisdom.  You  expected  bread,  and  you  have  got 
a  stone ;  break  your  teeth  on  it,  and  don't  shriek 
because  the  nerves  are  martyrised.  You  held  out 
your  hand  for  an  egg,  and  fate  put  into  it  a  scorpion. 
Show  no  consternation  :  close  your  fingers  firmly  upon 
the  gift ;  let  it  sting  through  your  palm.  Never  mind. 
In  time,  after  your  hand  and  arm  have  swelled  and 
quivered  long  with  torture,  the  squeezed  scorpion  will 
die,  and  you  will  have  learned  the  great  lesson  how  to 
endure  without  a  sob."  This  is  the  ethical  lesson 
which  Charlotte  Bronte  never  tires  of  enforcing,  but 
necessity  generally  takes,  for  her,  the  form  not  of  a 
dead,  inexorable  fate,  but  a  Father-God. 


CHAPTEE   XIV. 

THE  BRONTE  GENIUS— RETROSPECT— INFLU- 
ENCE OF  SCOTT  AND  WILSON— LOVE  OF 
SCOTLAND— M.  HEGER 'S INFLUENCE— CHAR- 
LOTTE'S IDEA  OF  LOVE— THE  YORKSHIRE 
SCHOOL  OF  LITERATURE— THE  DEATHS  OF 
EMILY  AND  ANNE— THE  MARRIAGE  AND 
DEATH  OF  CHARLOTTE. 

IT  is  seldom  that  the  critic  has  so  enticing  a  bit  of 
work  cut  out  for  him  as  is  afforded  by  the  Bronte 
literature,  and  in  particular  by  Charlotte  Bronte.  The 
mysterious  thing  called  genius,  of  which  critics  ought 
to  feel  themselves  the  humble  ministers  and  hiero- 
phants,  has  not  often  lent  himself  so  kindly  to  scientific 
inquisition.  The  celestial  spark,  the  immortal  germ, 
can  in  this  instance  be  traced  in  its  origin,  followed  in 
its  development,  estimated  in  its  fruits. 

An  eccentric  Irish  lad,  his  brain  full  of  Calvinistic 
theology,  his  heart  of  stiff  old  Tory  pride  and  not 
ungenerous  prejudice,  with  thin  but  genuine  melodies, 
like  tinklings  of  sheep  bells,  ringing  in  his  head,  conies 
to  Yorkshire,  divests  himself  of  his  Irish  name, 
Prunty,  apparently  also  of  all  Irish  national  feeling, 
marries  a  Cornish  girl,  frail  but  fine,  and  is  found, 


The  Bronte  Genius.  327 

about  the  time  of  the  passing  of  the  Reform  Bill,  a 
widower,  with  one  son  and  three  daughters,  clergyman 
of  Haworth,  a  poor  sequestered  parish,  high  up  among 
the  clouds  and  moors  of  Yorkshire.  From  Patrick 
Prunty,  self -named  Bronti  or  Bronte,  his  daughter 
Charlotte  and  her  sisters  derived  that  "  very  fiery 
particle  "  of  genius  which  all  his  children  seem  to 
have  possessed.  The  one  son  led  those  who  knew 
him  in  early  boyhood  to  believe  in  his  splendid 
abilities ;  but  he  was  so  soon  and  so  utterly  wrecked, 
morally  and  mentally,  that  were  it  not  for  his  relation- 
ship to  his  sisters,  his  name  would  not  for  an  hour 
have  escaped  oblivion.  The  moral  conditions  with 
which  girls  are  environed  in  England  never  vindicated 
themselves  so  impressively  as  in  the  contrast  presented 
by  the  unredeemed  and  heart-rending  failure  of  Bran- 
well  Bronte  and  the  noble  success  of  his  sisters.  Those 
passions  which,  under  due  governance  of  moral  law, 
might  have  been  impelling  forces  to  bear  him  to 
honour  and  fame,  became  fiends  that  tare  him  as  he 
wallowed  foaming.  This  is  the  grand  lesson  of  his 
life ;  and  it  is  one  worthy  of  being  laid  stress  upon ; 
for  there  are  some  in  these  days  who  would  sneer 
down,  as  Philistinism  and  bad  form,  that  reverence 
for  moral  law  which  has  characterised  the  sovereigns 
of  literature  generally,  and  most  conspicuously  of  all, 
the  sovereigns  of  that  literature  whose  highest  thrones 
are  occupied  by  Milton  and  Shakespeare. 

As  a  Tory,  old  Bronte  may  be  credited  with  a  double 
measure  of  that  enthusiasm  for  Scott  which  was  at  its 


328  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

height  when  his  daughters  were  passing  from  child- 
hood into  girlhood.  The  poems  and  novels  of  Scott 
and  Blackwood's  Magazine  were  the  delight  of  the 
"  family  of  poets  "  of  Haworth  Parsonage.  Under  the 
auspices  of  Scott  and  Wilson,  Scotland  became  dear  to 
Charlotte  Bronte — a  circumstance  otherwise  natural, 
for  Scotland  and  Yorkshire  have  varied  and  close 
affinities,  and  the  vernacular  of  the  latter  is  almost 
the  same  as  the  tongue  of  Burns.  She  preserved 
throughout  life  an  affectionate  feeling  towards  the 
northern  part  of  the  United  Kingdom,  in  striking 
contrast  with  the  bitter,  cold,  and  grudging  spirit 
with  which  the  London  schools,  whether  of  poetry  or 
of  science,  have  always  regarded  Scotland.  A  visit 
to  that  country,  after  she  had  become  famous,  did  not 
destroy  her  prepossession  in  its  favour.  The  very 
names  of  Melrose  and  Abbotsford  were  to  her  "  music 
and  magic."  "  My  dear  sir,"  she  wrote  to  a  London 
friend,  "  do  not  think  I  blaspheme  when  I  tell  you 
that  your  great  London,  as  compared  to  Dunedin, 
'  mine  own  romantic  town,'  is  as  prose  compared  to 
poetry,  or  as  a  great  rumbling,  rambling,  heavy  epic, 
compared  to  a  lyric,  brief,  bright,  clear,  and  vital  as  a 

flash  of  lightning You  have  nothing  like 

Arthur's  Seat,  and,  above  all,  you  have  not  the  Scotch 
national  character ;  and  it  is  that  grand  character, 
after  all,  which  gives  the  land  its  true  charm,  its  true 
greatness."  Scott's  delineations  of  the  peasants  and 
freebooters  of  Scotland  may  have  encouraged  Char- 
lotte Bronte  to  attempt  a  similar  portraiture  of  the 


M.  Heger.  329 


people  of  Yorkshire ;  and  from  no  author  could  she 
have  caught  the  contagion  of  an  impassioned  joy  in 
forest,  moor,  and  stream,  more  genially  than  from 
Wilson. 

But  it  was  France  that  lighted  the  torch  of  her 
genius.  After  being  partly  educated  in  England,  and 
serving  some  time,  with  indomitable  energy,  as  a 
governess,  she  went  to  Brussels,  and  came  under  the 
influence  of  M.  Heger.  He  saw  the  powers  of  her 
mind,  encouraged  her  in  composition,  taught  her  to 
sharpen  and  burnish  her  French  devoirs,  and  thus 
prepared  her  to  make  her  debut  as  an  English  author 
in  one  of  the  most  nervous,  terse,  and  brilliant  styles 
in  the  whole  range  of  English  prose — a  style  with  no 
fault  except  a  certain  uniformity,  a  too  sustained 
alertness  and  trenchancy, — a  style  quite  perfect  as 
a  music  of  battle  and  of  march,  but  far  less  adapted 
than  some  styles,  notably  than  the  style  of  Thackeray, 
to  express  the  sauntering  moods,  to  suit  the 
meditative  hours,  that  will  not  fail  to  occur  in  our 
earthly  pilgrimage.  One  cannot  think  without  a 
smile  of  the  immense  part  played  by  M.  Heger  and 
her  Brussels  residence  in  the  history  of  Charlotte 
Bronte.  Choleric  yet  good-hearted,  highly  intelligent 
yet  not  without  moodiness  and  whimsicality,  M. 
Heger  displayed  that  "force  du  caractere  recouvrant  une 
vibrante  tendresse,"  that  combination  of  masculine 
strength  with  feminine  tenderness,  which  M.  Eugene 
For9ade,  in  his  admirable  critique  on  Shirley,  declares 
to  be  irresistibly  attractive  to  women,  and  which  is 


330  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

the  keynote  of  all  Charlotte  Bronte's  characteristic 
heroes.  In  her  first  and  last  books — the  Professor  and 
Villette — the  scene  is  principally  laid  in  a  Brussels 
school ;  and  in  Shirley  she  puts  Flemish  blood  into 
the  veins  of  the  brothers  Moore,  and  avails  herself  of 
the  opportunity  thus  offered  her  of  airing  her  French. 
In  Villette  there  is  more  French  than  belongs  legiti- 
mately to  an  English  novel. 

It  is  beautiful,  however,  to  see  how  the  genial, 
brave,  and  healthy  nature  of  our  Yorkshire  girl  takes 
what  is  good,  and  rejects  all  that  is  evil,  in  the 
influence  of  the  Continent  and  of  France.  Like  a 
fair  flower,  she  draws  from  the  morass  its  richness, 
turns  it  into  petals  of  loveliest  form,  lifts  them  to  be 
bathed  in  the  colours  of  heaven,  and  lets  the  poison 
alone.  It  is  a  marvellously  stupid  and  superficial 
mistake  to  suppose  that  Charlotte  Bronte  assails 
English  marriage,  or  any  of  the  ideas  characteristically 
attached  to  marriage  in  England.  What  she  assails, 
both  in  Jane  Eyre  and  in  Shirley,  is  loveless  marriage, 
lucre-made.  What  she  denounces  is  the  laying  of 
young  hearts  on  the  altar  of  the  god  of  this  world. 
"  See  him,"  she  makes  Shirley  say,  describing  to  a 
wretched  worldling  the  activity  of  his  base  divinity, 
"  busied  at  the  work  he  likes  best — making  marriages. 
He  binds  the  young  to  the  old,  the  strong  to  the 
imbecile.  He  stretches  out  the  arm  of  Mezentius,  and 
fetters  the  dead  to  the  living.  In  his  realm  there  is 
hatred — secret  hatred  ;  there  is  disgust — unspoken 
disgust ;  there  is  treachery — family  treachery ;  there  is 


Charlotte's  Idea  of  Love.  331 

vice — deep,  deadly,  domestic  vice.  In  his  dominions, 
children  grow  unloving  between  parents  who  have 
never  loved ;  infants  are  nursed  on  deception  from 
their  birth  :  they  are  reared  in  an  atmosphere  corrupt 
with  lies.  Your  god  rules  at  the  bridal  of  kings — look 
at  your  royal  dynasties  !  Your  deity  is  the  deity  of 
foreign  aristocracies— analyse  the  blue  blood  of  Spain  ! 
Your  God  is  the  Hymen  of  France — what  is  French 
domestic  life  ?  All  that  surrounds  him  hastens  to 
decay ;  all  declines  and  degenerates  under  his  sceptre. 
Your  god  is  a  masked  death."  Marriage  without 
affection  was  in  her  eyes  desecration ;  but  she  shrank 
with  equal  aversion,  and  with  still  more  vehement 
contempt,  from  the  degraded  feelings  that  are  too 
often  passed  off  for  love  in  the  literature  and  on  the 
stage  of  France.  "  When  I  see  or  hear  either  man  or 
woman,"  she  writes,  "  couple  shame  with  love,  I  know 
their  minds  are  coarse,  their  associations  debased. 
.  .  .  In  their  dense  ignorance  they  blaspheme 
living  fire,  seraph-brought  from  a  Divine  altar.  They 
confound  it  with  sparks  mounting  from  Tophet."  She 
refers  with  bitter  scorn  to  those  who  mistook  the 
sympathetic  intensity  of  her  descriptions  of  spiritual 
passion  for  sympathetic  intensity  of  an  ignobler  sort. 
I  have  spoken  of  Emily  Bronte  as  a  woman  of,  in 
some  sense,  more  wonderful  and  original  genius  than 
that  of  her  sister.  Charlotte  has  not  left  anything 
evincing  such  subtle,  far-brought,  and  magical  power 
as  the  group  of  Heathcliff  and  Cathy,  nor  had  her  in- 
tellectual glance,  in  the  last  resort,  the  same  pene- 


332  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

trating  finality  as  Emily's ;  and  she  herself  agreed 
with  all  the  best  judges  in  awarding  the  palm  of 
poetic  superiority  to  Ellis  Bell.  Nevertheless,  it  is 
Charlotte  that  must  be  pronounced,  on  the  whole,  the 
chief  of  the  sisters,  the  head  of  this  unique  and  most 
interesting  Yorkshire  school  of  literature,  a  school 
that  may  outlive  English  as  a  spoken  language,  and 
that  was  founded,  established,  and  closed  by  three 
provincial  governesses,  the  oldest  of  whom  died  before 
forty.  Charlotte  stands  between  Emily  and  Anne, 
the  mean  between  two  extremes.  Emily  was  hard — 
too  hard.  In  her  books  and  in  her  life  she  lacked 
expansion  and  geniality.  She  was  unhealthy,  with 
deficient  stamina,  a  circumstance  quite  compatible 
with  spasmodic  and  contracted  strength.  She  has 
left  little,  and  that  little  imperfect ;  and  yet  it  may 
be  doubted  whether,  if  she  had  lived,  she  would  have 
done  much  more  or  much  better ;  for  there  is  hardly 
a  trace  of  youngness  in  her  work.  Anne,  though  also 
a  woman  of  unquestionable  genius,  fell  short  in  force- 
Her  verses  are,  indeed,  of  great  value  ;  they  express, 
with  faultless  simplicity,  clearness,  tenderness,  feel- 
ings absolutely  sincere,  and  as  pure  as  the  waters  of  a 
mountain  spring  ;  but  both  her  thoughts  and  her  feel- 
ings were  limited  in  range.  Charlotte  had  ten  times 
the  power  of  Anne,  and  her  nature  was  more  healthy 
and  genial,  her  culture  more  comprehensive,  than 
Emily's.  On  the  whole,  therefore,  we  must,  I  repeat, 
assign  her  the  first  place  among  the  sisters. 

As   the   Norwich    school   of    painters,   old   Crome, 


The  Yorkshire  School  of  Literature.          333 

Cotman,  and  their  few  brothers  of  genius,  made  the 
low,  dune-bordered  shores,  and  windy  downs,  and 
lingering  rivers,  and  bits  of  tufted  woodland,  that 
form  the  scenery  of  Norfolk,  memorable  in  art,  so  the 
Bronte  sisters  drew  the  eyes  of  all  the  world  towards 
their  native  Yorkshire.  It  is  a  rugged  land,  inhabited 
by  a  proud,  independent,  sturdy,  and  strong-brained 
race,  with  rather  a  grating  edge  towards  strangers, 
and  marked  individuality  of  character.  Emily  Bronte's 
old  Joseph  will  vie  with  the  peasants  of  Scott ;  and  a 
French  critic  remarked  that,  after  reading  Shirley, 
one  could  swear  that  he  had  lived  in  the  world  of 
Yorkshire.  Keen-witted,  observant,  sarcastically  con- 
temptuous of  sentiment,  but  at  heart  true  and  kind, 
the  Yorkes  and  Helstones  of  Shirley,  as  well  as  a 
number  of  peasants  and  mechanics,  are  speaking  por- 
traits from  the  West  Riding.  Eugene  Fo^ade 
amusingly  describes  the  Yorke  children  as  a  half- 
dozen  "  d'enfans  terribles  qui  sont  le  plus  bizarre 
echantillon  d' education  presbyterienne,  solitaire,  ego'iste, 
spontanee,  qu'eut  pu  rever  Jean-Jaques." 

Were  it  but  for  this  realisation  of  a  type  of  cha- 
racter belonging  to  a  territory  as  large  as  that  of 
ancient  Attica,  Charlotte  Bronte  would  take  prece- 
dence of  Miss  Austen.  Mr.  G.  H.  Lewes  who,  like 
Macaulay,  overrated  that  celebrated  novelist,  wrote 
advising  Charlotte  to  follow  the  counsel  shining  out 
of  his  idol's  "  mild  eyes,"  which  counsel  he  summed 
up  in  the  formula,  "  to  finish  more  and  be  more 
subdued."  In  reply  she  commented  politely,  but  with 


334  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

pungent  effect,  both  upon  the  precept  given  and  the 
example  suggested.  "  When  authors  write  best,"  she 
says,  "or  at  least  when  they  write  most  fluently,  an 
influence  seems  to  awaken  in  them,  which  becomes 
their  master — which  will  have  its  own  way — putting 
out  of  view  all  behests  but  its  own,  dictating  certain 
words,  and  insisting  on  their  being  used,  whether 
vehement  or  measured  in  their  nature  ;  new-moulding 
characters,  giving  unthought-of  turns  to  incidents,  re- 
jecting carefully-elaborated  old  ideas,  and  suddenly 
creating  and  adopting  new  ones.  Is  it  not  so  ?  And 
should  we  try  to  counteract  this  influence  ?  Can  we, 
indeed,  counteract  it?"  There  is,  of  course,  but  one 
answer  to  these  weighty  and  pertinent  questions. 
Charlotte  Bronte  was  not  only  right  in  maintaining 
against  Mr.  Lewes  that  authors  ought  to  listen  to  the 
voice  of  their  genius  and  obey  it — to  nurse  their  fire 
instead  of  subduing  it — but  expressed  the  prime  canon 
of  all  criticism,  when  criticism  attempts  to  direct  the 
artist.  To  advise  the  writer  to  subdue  his  fire  is  to 
give  him  the  counsel  by  which  Meer  Jafner  ruined 
Surajah  Dowlah  at  PI  assy,  namely,  to  call  off  his  force 
in  the  crisis  of  the  battle. 

Turning  to  the  subject  of  Miss  Austen,  Charlotte 
professes  herself  "  puzzled"  by  her  critic's  enthusiasm. 
She  had  sent  for  Pride  and  Prejudice,  which  Mr. 
Lewes  extolled  above  any  of  the  Waverley  novels. 
"And  what,"  she  proceeds,  "did  I  find?  An  accu- 
rate daguerreotyped  portrait  of  a  common-place  face  ; 
a  carefully-fenced,  highly-cultivated  garden,  with  neat 


Miss  Austen  and  Charlotte  Bronte.  335 

borders  and  delicate  flowers  ;  but  no  glance  of  a  bright, 
vivid  physiognomy,  no  open  country,  no  fresh  air,  no 
blue  hill,  no  bonny  beck.  I  should  hardly  like  to  live 
with  her  ladies  and  gentlemen,  in  their  elegant  but 
confined  houses."  Admiration  for  George  Sand  she 
can  (she  says)  understand,  for  whatever  Sand's  defects, 
she  has  grasp  of  mind,  sagacity,  profundity.  But 
"  Miss  Austen  is  only  shrewd  and  observant."  This  is 
true,  and  nearly  the  whole  truth.  Miss  Austen  has 
inexpressible  and  inestimable  delicacy  of  sentiment. 
Her  heroines  possess  a  sweetness  all  their  own,  a 
melodious  tenderness  and  sense  and  goodness  which 
make  their  way  into  our  heart  of  hearts,  and  remain 
there  for  ever.  Her  old  admirals,  too,  and  her  clergy- 
men and  young  naval  officers  are  singularly  true  to 
life.  But  she  has  no  invention,  no  incident.  Her 
characters  walk  out  in  pairs,  like  boarding-school  girls 
(only  that  one  in  each  pair  is  a  gentleman  and  a 
lover),  drive  in  phaetons,  "  taake  their  regular  meals," 
consult  for  weeks  about  private  theatricals,  and  live, 
on  the  whole,  about  as  quietly  as  tulips  in  a  Dutch 
garden.  Now,  it  is  a  universal  truth  in  criticism 
that  great  passion  and  great  thought  require  a  frame- 
work of  great  incident  for  their  display.  The  works 
of  Homer  and  of  Shakespeare — the  two  greatest 
delineators  of  passion  and  character — are  as  great  in 
incident  as  in  knowledge  of  human*  nature.  Void 
of  invention,  void  of  imagination,  depending  solely 
on  her  observation  and  her  sentiment,  Miss  Austen 
belongs  distinctively  to  the  minor  schools  of  lit- 


336  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 


erary  art;  Charlotte  Bronte,  gifted,  as  Jane  Eyre 
and  Shirley  conclusively  prove,  with  both,  is  a 
sister,  though  perhaps  a  little  sister,  of  the  great 
imaginative  story-tellers  of  the  world — :Homer  and 
Scott,  Sophocles  and  Shakespeare.  The  same  honour 
belongs,  I  think,  to  George  Eliot,  who  knows  the 
worth  of  incident,  and  certainly  stands  higher  than 
Charlotte  Bronte  in  reach  of  thought  and  variety  of 
power,  but  has  never  equalled  her  in  the  dewy  bril- 
liance, the  felicitous  splendour,  £>f  a  few  passages,  and 
cannot,  at  her  best,  describe  scenery  with  the  witching 
charm  and  freshness  of  the  Yorkshire  girls.  George 
Eliot  has  suffered  from  science,  that  cold  Siren  on 
whose  breast  Goethe  laid  his  head,  until  he  was 
gradually  transformed  from  the  inspired  poet  of  Faust, 
part  first,  into  the  droning  professor  of  Faust,  part 
second. 

There  is  a  tragedy,  it  has  been  said,  in  every  death- 
bed, and  -^Cschylus  might  be  searched  for  more  moving 
sadness  than  that  of  the  deaths  of  the  poetic  women 
of  Haworth  Parsonage.  Almost  immediately  after 
BranweH's  death  Emily  became  ill,  and  though  the 
mind  remained  clear  and  the  will  adamantine,  the 
body  yielded  fast  to  consumption.  Towards  the  end  of 
November,  1848,  the  deep,  tight  cough,  the  panting 
breath,  "  the  hollow,  wasted,  pallid  aspect,"  told  her 
sisters  that  she  was  dying.  But  she  would  see  no 
"  poisoning  doctor ;  "  when  one  came,  she  refused  to 
let  him  enter  her  presence  ;  and  when  Charlotte  wrote 
down  her  symptoms  and,  without  telling  her,  sent 


The  Death  of  Emily.  337 

them  to  a  London  physician,  she  would  not  take  his 
medicine.  She  seemed  to  defy  death.  "From  the 
trembling  hand,  the  unnerved  limbs,  the  fading  eyes, 
the  same  service  was  exacted  as  they  had  rendered  irj. 
health."  She  was,  however,  dying  rapidly,  and 
though  she  forced  herself  to  her  tasks,  her  interest  in 
•everything  around  her  was  vanishing  with  her  hold 
upon  life.  Charlotte  went  out  and  searched  the  cold 
December  moors  for  a  lingering  spray  of  heather,  and 
took  it  in  to  Emily.  But  it  was  too  late.  "The 
flower  was  not  recognised  by  the  dim  and  indifferent 
eyes."  So  died,  at  twenty-seven,  without  a  glimpse  of 
the  fame  that  awaited  her,  the  authoress  of  Wuthering 
Heights  and  of  that  poem  of  which  the  main  burden  is 
the  life-long  hiding  of  God's  face  from  one  of  His 
creatures,  who  had  yearned  vehemently  to  behold  it. 
Of  hope  or  of  heaven  there  does  not  appear  to 
have  been  one  syllable  uttered  by  Emily  Bronte 
throughout  her  illness.  They  laid  her  under  the 
pavement  of  Haworth  Church.  Her  "  fierce,  faith- 
ful bull-dog,"  to  which  Emily  had  been  very  kind, 
howled  pitifully  at  her  chamber  door  for  many 
days. 

Anne's  death  was  very  different.  She  had  been 
taken  to  Scarborough,  one  of  the  brightest  spots  in 
England,  and  it  was  the  month  of  May.  On  the  last 
Sunday  of  her  life,  "  the  evening  closed  in  with  the 
most  glorious  sunset  ever  witnessed.  The  castle  on 
the  cliff  stood  in  proud  glory  gilded  by  the  rays  of  the 
declining  sun.  The  distant  ships  glittered  like  bur- 

22 


338  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

nished  gold  ;  the  little  boats  near  the  beach  heaved  on 
the  ebbing  tide,  inviting  occupants.  Anne  was  drawn 
in  her  easy-chair  to  the  window  to  enjoy  the  scene. 
Her  face  became  illumined  almost  as  much  as  the 
glorious  scene  she  gazed  upon.  Little  was  said,  for  it 
was  plain  that  her  thoughts  were  driven  by  the 
imposing  view  before  her  to  penetrate  forwards  to  the 
regions  of  unfading  glory."  Next  day  she  gently 
asked  her  physician  how  long  she  had  to  live,  bidding 
him  not  fear  to  speak  truly,  for  she  did  not  fear  to 
die.  He  told  her  that  death  was  at  the  door.  She 
looked  serene  and  undistressed.  Clasping  her  hands,, 
she  invoked  a  blessing  on  Charlotte  and  on  a  friend 
who  waited  on  her.  "  Be  a  sister  in  my  stead.  Give 
Charlotte  as  much  of  your  company  as  you  can.'" 
She  thanked  them  both  for  their  kindness  to  her.. 
The  restlessness  of  death  came  upon  her,  and  they 
carried  her  to  the  sofa.  "  Soon  all  will  be  well,"  she 
said,  "  through  the  merits  of  our  Redeemer."  Pass- 
ing through  the  gates  of  death,  she  still  had  comfort 
for  her  sister.  "  Take  courage,  Charlotte ;  take 
courage."  Then,  "  calmly  and  without  a  sigh,"  she 
fell  asleep.  God  had  not  hidden  His  countenance 
from  Anne  Bronte. 

Charlotte  returned  to  the  lonely  parsonage.  She 
leant  upon  God,  and  He  did  not  fail  her;  but  the 
solitude  was  deep.  "  The  great  trial,"  she  writes  to  a 
friend,  "is  when  evening  closes  and  night  approaches. 
At  that  hour  we  used  to  assemble  in  the  dining-room 
— we  used  to  talk.  Now  I  sit  by  myself— necessarily 


Charlotte's  Marriage.  339» 

I  am  silent."  On  windy  nights,  in  the  wailing  of  the 
gale  in  the  churchyard  and  about  the  parsonage,  she 
fancied  she  heard  the  spirits  of  her  sisters  trying  to- 
reach  her.  Balmy  days  came,  and  the  sun  of  May 
lighted  the  moors,  making  them  "  green  with  young 
fern  and  moss,  in  secret  little  hollows,"  but  to  her  they 
were  very  desolate — "a  wilderness,  featureless,  solitary,, 
saddening.  My  sister  Emily,"  she  goes  on,  "had  a 
particular  love  for  them,  and  there  is  not  a  knoll  of 
heather,  not  a  branch  of  fern,  not  a  young  bilberry- 
leaf,  not  a  fluttering  lark  or  linnet,  but  reminds  me 
of  her.  The  distant  prospects  were  Anne's  delight, 
and  when  I  look  round,  she  is  in  the  blue  tints,  the 
pale  mists,  the  waves  and  shadows  of  the  horizon.'" 
Is  there  any  poetry  lovelier  or  sadder  than  that  ? 

Life,  however,  was  not  yet  over  for  Charlotte.  With 
heroic  resolution  she  stood  to  her  work,  habitually 
dwelling  upon  the  thought  of  Divine  help.  "  The 
strength,"  she  had  formerly  said,  in  the  simple  and 
intense  faith  of  that  Calvinism  which  she  learned  from 
her  father,  and  which  runs  through  her  books  and 
letters,  "  the  strength,  if  strength  we  have,  is  certainly 
never  in  our  own  selves;  it  is  given  us."  A  change 
came  over  her  life  when,  in  1854,  she  was  married  to 
a  man  she  wholly  loved.  Her  friends  "  thought  of  the 
slight  astringencies  of  her  Character,  and  how  they 
would  turn  to  full  ripe  sweetness  in  that  calm  sunshine 
of  domestic  peace."  Her  look  brightened.  She  was 
sensible  of  a  new  warmth  at  her  heart  on  hearing  a 
villager  describe  her  husband,  Mr.  Nicholls,  as  a 


340  Charlotte  Bronte  and  Her  Sisters. 

*l  consistent  Christian  and  a  kind  gentleman,"  which 
41  high  but  simple  eulogium"  she  could,  she  said,  echo. 
She  and  her  father  and  her  husband,  who  was  her 
father's  curate,  lived  in  the  old  parsonage  on  the  high 
moor,  the  graves  around  it,  the  stars  above.  Her 
happiness  endured  but  for  a  few  months.  With  the 
prospect  before  her  of  becoming  a  mother,  she  found 
her  health  give  way.  True  to  her  religious  principles, 
she  endured  all  with  unflinching  patience.  At  last, 
awaking  from  long  stupor,  she  saw  from  the 
surrounding  faces  that  she  was  dying.  "  Oh  !  "  she 
said,  faintly,  "  I  am  not  going  to  die,  am  I?  He  will 
not  separate  us ;  we  have  been  so  happy."  I  pity 
those  who  trace  in  these  words  any  spirit  of  irrever- 
ence. They  seem  to  me  as  consistent  with  sincere 
and  profound  and  affectionate  regard  for  God,  as  the 
burst  of  tears  of  a  glad  child,  when  told  by  its  parent 
to  put  down  its  playthings  and  go  to  bed,  is  consistent 
with  filial  love.  But  more  touching  words  have  seldom 
been  uttered.  Charlotte  Bronte  died  as  she  had  lived, 
a  godly  and  honourable  woman,  one  of  whom  England 
and  the  world  may  be  proud. 


lA 


W.    SPEA1GHT    AND    SONS,    PRINTERS,    FETTKR    LANE,    LONDON. 


RETURN  TO  the  circulation  desk  ot  any 
University  ot  California  Library 

or  to  the 

NORTHERN  REGIONAL  LIBRARY  FACILITY 
Bldg.400,  Richmond  Field  Station 
University  of  California 
Richmond,  CA  94804-4698 

ALL  BOOKS  MAY  BE  RECALLED  AFTER  7  DAYS 

•  2-month  loans  may  be  renewed  by  calling 
(510)642-6753 

•  1-year  loans  may  be  recharged  by  bringing 
books  to  NRLF 

•  Renewals  and  recharges  may  be  made  4 
days  prior  to  due  date. 

DUE  AS  STAMPED  BELOW 


JULi/1996 


RETURNED 


JUL  1  5  1996 


Santa  Cruz 


12,000(11/95) 


U.C.  BERKELEY  LIBRARIES 


COOflt^flfllB 


¥C§45884 


V