Skip to main content

Full text of "Uniform crime reports for the United States"

See other formats


-&" 


t 


^ 


•') 


Given  By 
U  S.  SUPT.  OF  DOCUMENTS 


3^ 


i 


UNIFORM 

CRIME 

REPORTS 

FOR  THE  UNITED  STATES 
AND  ITS  POSSESSIONS 

ISSUED  BY  THE 

FEDERAL  BUREAU  OF  INVESTIGATION 

UNITED  STATES  DEPARTMENT  OF  JUSTICE 

WASHINGTON,  D.  C 


Volume  XXIV 
SEMIANNUAL  BULLETIN 


Number  ( 
1953 


UNIFORM 
CRIME  REPORTS 

FOR  THE  UNITED  STATES 
AND  ITS  POSSESSIONS 


Volume  XXIV— Number  1 
SEMIANNUAL  BULLETIN,  1953 


Issued  by  the 

Federal  Bureau  of  Investigation 

United  States  Department  of  Justice 

Washington,  D.  C. 


ADVISORY 


International  Association  of  Chiefs  of  Police 


UNITED  STATES 

GOVERNMENT  PRINTING  OFFICE 

WASHINGTON  :  1953 


Boston  Public  LH^rar^ 

Superintendent  of  Documentf   \  ^  tr  :i     ir  / 


CONTENTS  ^ 

Page 
Summary  of  volume  XXIV,  No.  1 1 

Crime  trends: 

Estimated  number  of  major  crimes,  January-June,  1952-53  (table  !)_       2-3 

Urban  crime  trends,  January-June,  1952-53  (table  2) 4 

Rural  crime  trends,  January-June,  1952-53  (table  3) 4 

Crime  rates: 

Urban  crime  rates,  January-June,  1953 — cities  divided  according  to 

population  (table  4) 5-6 

Urban  crime  rates,  January-June,  1953 — cities  divided  according  to 

location  (tables  5-7) 7-9 

Rural  crime  rates,  January-June,  1953  (table  8) 10 

Offenses  in  individual  areas: 

Offenses  in  cities  witii  more  than  25,000  inhabitants  (table  9) 11-19 

Police  employee  data: 

Police  employees  killed,  1952  (table  10) 20 

Number  of  pohce  employees  per  1,000  inhabitants,  April  30,  1953 — 

cities  grouped  by  size  and  location  (tables  11,  12) 20-23 

Police  employees  in  individual  cities,  April  30,  1953  (tables  13,  14)_._  23-43 
Offenses  cleared  and  persons  arrested: 

Offenses  cleared  by  arrest,  1952 — cities  divided  according  to  size  (table 

15) 44^7 

Offenses  cleared  by  arrest,  1952 — cities  divided  according  to  location 

(table  16) 48 

Persons  charged,  1952 — cities  divided  according  to  population  (tables 

17,  18) 49-52 

Persons  charged,  1952 — cities  divided  according  to  location  (table  19) .  52-55 
Offenses  known,  offenses  cleared,  persons  charged  and  persons  found 

guilty,  1952 — part  I  offense  classes  (table  20) 56-58 

Persons  charged  and  persons  found  guilty,   part  II   offense  classes 

(table  21) 56-57,59-60 

Persons  released,  1952 — cities  divided  according  to  population  (tables 

22,  23) 61-63 

Classification  of  offenses 64-65 


[n] 


UNIFORM  CRIME  REPORTS 

J.  Edgar  Hoover,  Director,  Federal  Bureau  of  Investigation,  U.  S.  Department 
of  Justice,  Washington,  D.  C. 

Volume  XXIV  JULY  1953  Number  1 

SUMMARY 

Estimated  Number  of  Major  Criryies,  January-June,  1952-53 

Major  crimes  increased  2.5  percent  in  the  first  six  months  of  1953 
compared  with  the  same  period  in  1952.  The  1,047,000  crimes  at  the 
midyear  point  of  1953  represented  a  9.0  percent  increase  over  the  1951 
semiannual  figures.  Victims  of  killers  in  this  country  numbered 
6,470  while  over  54,000  other  individuals  were  feloniously  assaulted 
by  rapists  or  potential  killers.  Over  29,000  victims  were  confronted 
by  robbers  using  guns,  other  weapons  or  force. 
Crime  Trends 

Total  crime  increased  2.5  percent  led  by  an  8.4  percent  rise  in 
aggravated  assaidts  and  a  6.5  percent  rise  in  offenses  of  rape.  Auto 
thefts  increased  5.1  percent  but  other  property  crimes  and  criminal 
homicides  increased  only  nominally. 

City  crimes  registered  only  a  0.5  percent  increase  in  total  crime  but 
reflected  a  7.0  percent  and  6.6  percent  increase,  respectively,  in 
aggravated  assaults  and  negligent  manslaughters.  Murders  and 
rapes  increased  0.1  percent  and  3.0  percent,  respectively,  while  city 
robberies,  burglaries  and  thefts  decreased  slightly.  City  auto  thefts 
rose  4.8  percent. 

Rural  crimes  increased  9.0  percent  supported  by  increases  in  all 
classes  except  negligent  manslaughters  (—6.0  percent). 
Police  Employee  Data 

In  1952,  63  police  in  3,671  cities  were  killed  in  line  of  duty.  The 
rate  3.64  killed  per  5  million  population  is  an  improvement  over  the 
3.81  in  1951. 

As  of  April  30,  1953,  police  numbered  1.78  per  1,000  inhabitants  as 
compared  with  1.75  in  1952. 
Offenses  Cleared  By  Arrest,  1952 

For  each  10  homicides  in  1952,  9  were  cleared  by  the  police.     Ex- 
cluding larcenies,  police  cleared  by  arrest  1  out  of  2.9  of  the  remaining 
more  serious  crunes.     Only  1  out  of  5  larcenies  was  cleared. 
Persons  Found  Guilty,  1952 

Of  each  100  persons  charged  by  the  police  in  1952  with  major 
(Part  I)  crimes,  70  were  found  guilty.  Almost  67  percent  of  the 
persons  charged  with  Part  II  crimes  were  convicted. 

(1) 


CRIME  TREND-  U.  S. 

BASED  ON  THE  ESTIMATED  NUMBER 
OF  MAJOR  CRIMES 

Jan. -June  1952  vs.  Jan. -June  1953 

PERCENT  CHANGE 


TOTAL 


Negligent 
Manslaughter 

Rape 


Figure  1. 


CRIME  TRENDS 

Estimated  Number  of  Major  Crimes,  January-June,  1952-53 

The  1,047,000  crimes  in  the  first  half  of  1953  represented  an  increase 
of  2.5  percent  over  the  same  period  of  1952  and  a  9.0  percent  increase 
over  the  1951  six-months  figure. 

Increases  over  1952  ranged  from  8.4  percent  for  aggravated  assaults 
to  0.6  percent  for  murder.  Crimes  of  rape  increased  6.5  percent  and 
negligent  manslaughters  (mostly  traffic  killings)  rose  0.7  percent. 
All  crimes  against  the  person  combined  (murder,  negligent  man- 
slaughter, rape,  and  aggravated  assault)  increased  7.2  percent. 

Property  crimes  (auto  theft,  burglary,  robbery,  and  larceny)  in- 
creased 5.1  percent,  3.4  percent,  1.4  percent,  and  1.2  percent  respec- 
tively.    Grouping  property  crimes  a  2.2  percent  increase  is  noted. 

The  nationwide  estimated  increase  of  2.5  percent  in  crime  is  based 
on  a  reported  9.0  percent  increase  in  rural  crime  and  a  0.5  percent 
increase  in  city  crime.  Table  1  presents  the  details  of  the  crime 
estimate  for  the  first  6  months  of  1952-53.  While  the  estimated 
total  major  crimes  includes  larceny  of  all  classes.  Part  II  offenses, 
some  of  which  are  of  a  serious  nature  such  as  arson  and  embezzlement, 
are  excluded  and  for  that  reason  the  estimated  total  is  considered  to  be 
conservative. 

Table  1.— CRIME  TRENDS,  URBAN  AND  RURAL 

[Estimated  number  of  major  crimes  in  the  United  States  January-June,  1952-53] 


Offense 


TOTAL,  _ 

Murder  and  nonnegligent  manslaughter 

Manslaughter  by  negligence 

Rape 

Robbery 

Aggravated  assault 

Burglary— breaking  or  entering 

Larceny — theft 

Auto  theft 


N  umber  of  offenses 
January-June 


1952 


1, 022,  200 


3,370 
3,060 
8,320 
29, 190 

42, 090 
224,  840 
604, 210 
107, 120 


1, 047, 290 


3,390 
3,080 
8,860 
29, 610 

45, 630 
232,  510 
611,610 
112,600 


Change 


Number        Percent 


+25,  090 


+20 
+20 
+540 
+420 

+3,  .540 
+7,  670 
+7,  400 
+5,  480 


+2.5 


+.6 

+.7 

+  6.5 

+  1.4 

+8.4 
+3.4 
+  1.2 
+5.1 


(3) 


Urban  Crime  Trends 

Although  city  crimes  increased  only  0.5  percent,  crimes  against 
the  person  in  the  first  6  months  of  1953  were  6.2  percent  above  the 
1952  half-year  figures.  This  increase  was  led  by  aggravated  assaults, 
plus  7.0  percent. 

The  nominal  rise  of  0.2  percent  in  city  crimes  with  propert}^  as  their 
object  resulted  principally  from  a  4.8  percent  increase  in  auto  thefts. 

Table  2.— URBAN  CRIME  TRENDS,  JANUARY-JUNE,  1952-53 
.  [Offenses  known  to  the  police  in  2,182  cities,  total  population  72,731,766  based  on  1950  decennial  census] 


Offense 


TOTAL- 


Murder  and  nonnegligent  manslaughter. 

Manslaughter  by  negligence 

Rape 

Robbery 


Aggravated  assault 

Burglary — breaking  or  entering. 

Larceny — theft 

Auto  theft 


Number  of  offenses 
January— June 


1952 


622, 307 


1.  675 
1, 156 
4,040 

21,857 

27,  794 
145, 990 
354,194 

65, 601 


625,  359 


1,677 

1.232 

4,163 

21,772 

29,741 
145,  a59 
352, 082 

68,  733 


Change 


Number 


+3. 062 


+2 

+76 

+123 

-85 

+1,947 

-31 

-2, 112 

+3. 132 


Percent 


+0.5 


+0.1 
+6.6 
+3.0 
-0.4 

+7.0 


(1) 


-0.6 

+4.8 


1  Decrease  of  less  than  1/10  of  1  percent. 

Rural  Crime  Trends 

The  9.0  percent  increase  in  rural  crime  was  led  by  a  14.1  percent 
increase  in  burglaries  and  a  13.8  percent  increase  in  aggravated 
assaults.  Rape  and  robbery  each  increased  over  10  percent,  while 
thefts,  including  autos,  rose  6  percent. 

Negligent  manslaughters  registered  the  only  decrease,  6.0  percent, 
but  wilful  killings  increased  1.5  percent. 

Table  3.— RURAL  CRIME  TRENDS,  JANUARY-JUNE,  1952-53 

[Based  on  reports  of  1,428  sheriffs,  84  rural  village  officers,  and  10  State  police;  total  runil  population, 
37,718,834,  based  on  the  1950  decennial  census) 


Offense 


Number  of  offenses 
January— June 


1953 


Change 


Number 


Percent 


TOTAL 

Murder  and  nonnegligent  manslaughter. 

Manslaughter  by  negligence 

Rape... 

Robbery 

Aggravated  assault 

Burglary — breaking  or  entering 

Larceny — theft 

Autotheft 


103, 999 


113,380 


+9,381 


850 
1,004 
2, 066 
3,030 

5,874 
32.383 
48, 135 
10, 657 


863 

944 

2,289 

3,342 


36. 939 
51,012 
11,304 


+  13 

-60 

+223 

+312 

+813 
+4, 556 
+2, 877 

+647 


+9.0 


+  1.  ■'■> 

-6.0 

+10.8 

+10.3 

+13.8 

+  14.  1 

+6.0 

+6.1 


CRIME  RATES 

Urban  Crime  Rates,  January-June  1953 

Crime  rates  differ  from  trends  in  that  the  trends  are  based  on  a 
comparison  of  actual  figures  from  identical  contributors  for  2  or  more 
given  periods,  while  the  rates  are  actual  figures  in  terms  of  units  of 
population  (100,000)  and  are  not  necessarily  limited  to  the  reports 
of  contributors  used  in  the  trends.  Rates  provide  a  means  of  study- 
ing local  figures  in  relation  to  national  or  other  geographic  area  crime 
experience. 

The  largest  cities,  Group  I  (those  cities  with  a  population  of  over 
250,000)  had  the  highest  rates  except  for  larceny.  The  Group  II 
(cities  with  a  population  of  from  100,000  to  250,000)  exceeded  all 
others  in  larcenies. 

The  smallest  cities  had  the  lowest  rate  in  all  offenses  with  three  ex- 
ceptions— Group  IV  (25,000  to  50,000  in  population)  was  lower  in 
rape  and  Group  V  (10,000  to  25,000  in  population)  was  lower  in 
murder  and  rape  than  the  smallest  cities,  Group  VI  (population  2,500 
to  10,000). 

An  arrangement  of  the  rates  by  geographic  areas  reflects  wide 
variations  among  the  various  sections  of  the  country. 

The  Pacific  States  as  a  group  had  the  highest  crime  rate  for  robbery, 
burglary,  larceny,  and  auto  theft. 

The  East  South  Central  States  as  a  group  exceeded  all  others  in 
murder,  and  the  South  Atlantic  States  had  the  largest  assault  rate. 
The  New  England  States  ranked  lowest  in  all  crime  rates. 

An  analysis  of  these  variations  points  up  the  inadvisability  of  com- 
paring rates  of  localities  in  different  geographic  areas  and  emphasizes 
the  many  factors  affecting  the  volume  of  crime. 

(5) 


Table  4.— URBAN  CRIME  RATES,  JANUARY-JUNE,  1953,  BY  POPULA- 
TION GROUPS 

(Offenses  known  to  the  police  and  rate  per  100,000  inhabitants.    Population  figures  based  on  IS.IO  decennial 

census] 


Population  group 


Mur- 
der,      Man- 

nonnog-l  slaugh- 


Criminal 
homicide 


ligent 
man- 
slaugh- 
ter 


ter  hy 
negli- 
gence 


Rape 


Rob- 
bery 


Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


Bur- 
glary— 
break- 
ing or 
enter- 
ing 


Lar- 
ceny- 
theft 


Auto 
theft 


TOTAL,  GROUPS  I-VI 

2,454    cities;    total    population, 
78,609,955: 

Nnmberof  oflfensesknown 

Rate  per  100,000 


40  cities  over  250,000;  total  popula- 
tion, 34,524,513: 

Number  of  offenses  known 

Rate  per  100,000 


GROUP  n 

66  cities,    100,000   to   250,000;   total 
population,  9,694,111: 

Number  of  offenses  known 

Rate  per  100,000 


GROUP  in 

121   cities,   50,000   to   100,000;    total 
population,  8,528,691: 

Number  of  offenses  known 

Rate  per  100,000 


240    cities,    25,000    to    50,000; 
population,  8,482,821: 
Number  of  offenses  known 
Rate  per  100,000 


total 


653    cities,    10,000    to    25,000;    total 
population,  10,098,483: 

Number  of  offenses  known 

Rate  per  100,000 


GROUP  VI 

1,334  cities  under  10,000;  total  popu- 
lation, 7,281,336: 

N  um  ber  of  offenses  known 

Rate  per  100,000 


1,848 
2.35 


1,014 
2.94 


168 
1.97 


160 


129 
1.28 


100 
1.37 


1.354 
1.72 


4,629 
6.76 


23, 648     81, 748 
30. 1         40. 4 


157,  574 
200.5 


'  365,  634       75,  540 
477.  6  96.  1 


801 
2.32 


188 
1.94 


144 


117 
1.38 


.38 


501 
5.17 


320 
.3.75 


289 
3.41 


275 
2.72 


251 
3.45 


17, 351 
50.3 


2,482 
25.6 


1,391 
16.3 


966 
11.4 


864 
8.6 


594 
8.2 


20,  227 
58.6 


3,573 
36.9 


3,119 
36.6 


1.915 
22.6 


1.775 
17.6 


1,139 
15.6 


84,048 
243.4 


21,887 
225.8 


15, 232 
178.6 


14.164 
167.0 


14,220 
140.8 


8,023 
110.2 


1  162,660 
501.2 


52,  732 
544.0 


42, 029 
492.8 


42. 478 
500.8 


43. 464 
430. 4 


22,171 
304.5 


I  The  number  of  offenses  and  rates  for  larceny-theft  are  based  on  reports  as  follows:  Groups  I- VI,  2,453 
cities,  total  population,  76,538,350;  Group  I,  39  cities,  total  population,  32,452,908. 


Table   5.— URBAN    CRIME    RATES,    JANUARY-JUNE    1953,    BY 

GEOGRAPHIC  DIVISIONS  AND  STATES 

[Offenses  known  per  100,000  inhabitants.    Population  based  on  1950  decennial  census] 


Division  and  State 


TOTAL. 
New  England... 


Connecticut 

Maine 

Massachusetts.. - 
New  Hampshire. 

Rhode  Island 

Vermont 


Middle  Atlantic 

New  Jersey 

New  York 

Pennsylvania. - 

East  North  Central. 


Illinois 

Indiana 

Michigan. . 

Ohio 

Wisconsin. 


West  North  Central.. 

Iowa 

Kansas 

Minnesota 

Missouri 

Nebraska.. 

North  Dakota.- 
South  Dakota... 

South  Atlantic  * 

Delaware.. 

Florida 

Georgia 

Maryland 

North  Carolina- 
South  Carolina., 

Virginia 

West  Virginia... 

East  South  Central... 


Alabama 

Kentucky... 
Mississippi. 
Tennessee... 


West  South  Central. 

Arkansas 

Louisiana 

Oklahoma. 

Texas 


Mountain 

Arizona 

Colorado 

Idaho.. 

Montana 

Nevada 

New  Mexico. 

Utah 

Wyoming 

Pacific. 


California 

Oregon 

Washington. 


Murder, 

non- 
negligent 

man- 
slaughter 


.99 
1.24 
.67 


1.50 


1.17 
L43 
1.81 

1.96 


2.48 
1.95 
2.10 
1.71 
.67 

1.61 


.55 
1.67 

.40 
3.43 
1.54 


6.10 


1.54 
5.50 
6.73 
3.25 
5.99 
4.50 
5.84 
3.74 

6.05 


6.54 
6.15 
4.74 
5.90 

5.26 


5.78 
4.50 
2.96 
6.06 

2.00 


4.59 
2.03 
1.05 
2.01 
2.00 
1.62 
1.37 
.78 

1.53 


1.59 
.89 
1.53 


Robbery 


8.6 
5.6 
8.0 
1.6 
6.1 
.8 

30.7 


17.3 
37.6 
24.5 

33.7 


55.3 
22.4 
34.5 
22.1 
5.5 

24.9 


5.6 
22.6 
16.9 
50.1 
12.3 
3.9 
2.8 

29.7 


23.8 
31.9 
21.0 
39.6 
14.3 
14.8 
30.3 
12.6 

26.3 


19.8 
44.4 
9.5 
23.5 

22.2 


18.5 
22.4 
20.6 
23.0 

28.8 


60.4 
39.1 
7.3 
17.1 
.56.0 
18.9 
12.1 
12.5 

47.7 


52.9 
19.6 
33.7 


Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


6.9 


15.8 
4.3 
4.6 
2.7 
7.3 
4.2 

31.5 


25.1 
40.4 
17.4 

35.6 


42.8 
21.7 
59.0 
24.1 

8.4 

27.6 


4.1 
24.8 

4.2 
71.0 

4.6 

L7 
111.4 


10.7 

59.6 
105.2 

68.2 
180.4 

65.1 
102.6 

27.3 

62.6 


25.0 
55.0 

41.3 


52.3 
32.3 
21.6 
48.3 

18.6 


32.5 
20.1 
15.7 
20.6 
16.0 
22.1 
7.4 
12.5 

39.8 


47.7 
14.9 
8.1 


Burglary, 
breaking 

or 
entering 


200.5 


127.2 


170.5 
98.7 

113.4 
81.8 

170.5 
87.6 

190.9 


175.9 
216.9 
148.3 

150.2 


154.2 
191.2 
176.4 
137.1 
70.0 

167.2 


118.4 
185.4 
142.2 
231.6 
121.8 
93.7 
90.0 

257.8 


237.3 
356.6 
237.4 
250.8 
191.9 
222.4 
247.3 
130.8 

228.1 


246.7 
281.6 
171.6 

188.7 

259.8 


201.6 
122.5 
244.9 
317.1 

273.9 


466.9 
328.9 
185.1 
158.9 
410.3 
222.5 
197.9 
144.1 

294.2 


306.8 
246.0 
249.1 


Larceny, 
theft 


294.0 


342.5 
334.5 
267.7 
233.3 
369.4 
282.7 

2  332.  5 


296.9 
377.5 
I  227.  2 

435.5 


296.5 
519.0 
583.9 
456.1 
414.2 

455.8 


420.6 
553.1 
417.6 
470.1 
440.5 
477.9 
403.7 

562.7 


641.9 
706.2 
455.9 
565.4 
450.0 
560.8 
660.6 
297.3 

359.1 


339.1 
496.9 
254.5 
306.1 

603.4 


424.5 
336.5 
620.8 
709.9 

807.7 


1,  310.  6 
753.1 
853.7 
734.4 

1,  056.  7 
521.2 
777.8 
627.7 

842.1 


868.0 
736.0 
753  5 


166.6 
95.3 
136.0 


'  The  rate  for  larceny  is  based  on  the  reports  of  2,453  cities  with  a  total  population  of  76,538,350. 
'  The  rate  for  larceny  is  based  on  the  reports  of  521  cities  with  a  total  population  of  18,801,906. 
3  The  rate  for  larceny  is  based  on  the  reports  of  218  cities  with  a  total  population  of  3,894,657. 
*  Includes  the  District  of  Columbia. 


268455° — 53- 


Table    6.— URBAN    CRIME    RATES,    JANUARY-JUNE    1953,    BY 
GEOGRAPHIC  DIVISIONS  AND  POPULATION  GROUPS 

[Offenses  known  per  100,000  inhabitants.    Population  based  on  1950  decennial  census] 


Division  and  group 


TOTAL 

New  England 

Group  I 

Group  II 

Group  III 

Group  IV 

Group  V 

Group  VI 

Middle  Atlantic 

Group  I 

Group  II 

Group  III 

Group  IV 

Group  V 

Group  VI 

East  North  Central. 

Group  I-- 

Group  II 

Group  III 

Group  IV 

Group  V 

Group  VI 

West  North  Central 

Group  I 

Group  II 

Group  III 

Group  IV 

Group  V 

Group  VI 

South  Atlantic  * 

Group  I 

Group  II 

Group  III 

Group  IV 

Group  V 

Group  VI 

East  South  Central- 
Group  I 

Group  II 

Group  III 

Group  IV 

Group  V 

Group  VI 

West  South  Central 

Group  I 

Group  II -. 

Group  III 

Group  IV 

Group  V 

Group  VI 

Mountain 

Group  I 

Group  II 

Group  III 

Group  IV 

Group  V 

Group  VI 

Pacific - 

Group  I 

Group  II 

Group  III 

Group  IV 

Group  V 

Group  VI 


Murder, 

non- 
negligent 

man- 
slaughter 

Robbery 

Aggra- 
vated 
assault 

Burglary, 
breaking 

or 
entering 

Larceny, 
theft 

Auto 
theft 

2.35 

30.1 

40.4 

200.5 

1  477.  6 

96.1 

.72 

7.4 

6.9 

127.2 

294.0 

58.9 

1.25 

17.2 

12.2 

71.6 

263.5 

126.3 

.54 

9.3 

13.0 

173.9 

360.1 

76.6 

1.32 

6.1 

4.1 

135. 9 

309.2 

49.9 

.50 

5.5 

2.9 

119.4 

277.6 

35.2 

.29 

2.5 

1.8 

109.3 

233.8 

27.2 

.30 

.9 

4.2 

79.5 

225.6 

22.9 

1.50 

30.7 

31.5 

190.9 

2  332. 5 

70.8 

2.12 

47.0 

46.1 

247.6 

3  390. 1 

89.3 

.50 

13.1 

12.9 

143.7 

295.  0 

62.4 

.93 

9.8 

16.3 

134.8 

267.8 

54.4 

.78 

6.2 

9.1 

124.1 

303.7 

41.9 

.32 

5.1 

8.5 

85.7 

255.8 

38.3 

.67 

3.8 

6.2 

71.2 

203.3 

28.0 

1.96 

33.7 

35.6 

150.2 

435.5 

85.1 

2.99 

56.1 

56.7 

170.9 

441.1 

111.3 

2.01 

29.1 

33.8 

192.1 

549.7 

91.8 

1.12 

16.7 

27.9 

134.1 

463.8 

77.5 

.83 

10.1 

11.3 

133.9 

468.3 

62.8 

.70 

7.6 

8.5 

115.2 

431.9 

44.3 

.75 

6.4 

5.5 

94.5 

251.0 

36.0 

1.61 

24.9 

27.6 

167.2 

455.8 

78.2 

3.00 

48.3 

57.8 

226.4 

505.4 

124.8 

2.07 

24.1 

26.7 

200.8 

601.2 

85.1 

.45 

11.9 

12.2 

146.2 

551.9 

61.0 

.32 

6.8 

2.4 

126.2 

422.1 

46.7 

.74 

6.5 

4.1 

126.6 

405.5 

39.9 

.35 

6.1 

3.3 

75.3 

229.7 

27.1 

5.10 

29.7 

111.4 

257.8 

562.7 

132.4 

4.58 

48.0 

155.1 

289.3 

596.1 

196.3 

5.93 

41.9 

97.8 

331.4 

663.5 

173.7 

5.29 

18.8 

107.8 

230.2 

559.2 

96.1 

5.49 

13.4 

87.1 

231.  7 

635.1 

89.5 

4.91 

9.1 

85.8 

205.6 

434.5 

63.2 

4.24 

14.1 

79.2 

146.0 

309.2 

53.4 

6.05 

26.3 

62.6 

228.1 

359.1 

101.  0 

6.05 

40.2 

77.8 

282.8 

412.2 

144.3 

7.51 

24.5 

47.3 

243.5 

385.8 

110.1 

4.38 

24.8 

90.2 

209.9 

405.5 

83.2 

6.68 

12.6 

79.9 

180.7 

362.9 

68.1 

4.59 

15.7 

36.5 

188.0 

266.1 

44.0 

5.23 

9.0 

22.0 

107.6 

152.  1 

44.8 

5.26 

22.2 

41.3 

259.8 

603.4 

134.4 

7.82 

33.6 

44.6 

351.5 

684.2 

211.  3 

4.86 

27.1 

42.2 

277.0 

732. 1 

127.2 

3.61 

14.4 

64.8 

251.5 

708.1 

145.4 

6.04 

9.9 

37.3 

197.  3 

558.4 

84.8 

2.28 

5.9 

28.2 

145.4 

404.2 

45.7 

2.69 

13.3 

24.6 

116.6 

239.9 

30.0 

2.00 

28.8 

18.6 

273.9 

807.7 

123.4 

3.  13 

53.2 

29.3 

383.6 

740.3 

133.0 

2.08 

37.4 

17.7 

371.0 

1,118.6 

207.3 

2.76 

36.3 

21.1 

318.0 

828.5 

169.6 

2.29 

25.8 

18.6 

263.2 

1,  072.  4 

157.5 

.87 

7.2 

9.3 

172.7 

670.1 

64.9 

1.25 

16.9 

15.2 

180.6 

575.3 

60.5 

1.53 

47.7 

39.8 

294.2 

842.1 

156.9 

1.76 

64.6 

62.0 

324.5 

786.  2 

194.0 

1.66 

44.2 

11.2 

224.7 

831.3 

109.9 

.81 

38.0 

19.0 

294.3 

964.1 

118.0 

1.81 

28.4 

19.2 

304.1 

982.9 

143.1 

1.01 

23.4 

13.1 

251.4 

937.1 

110.5 

1.22 

13.5 

12.3 

219.3 

752.8 

92.4 

1  The  rate  for  larceny  is  based  on  the  reports  of  2,453  cities  with  a  population  of  76,538,350. 

2  The  rate  for  larceny  is  based  on  the  reports  of  521  cities  with  a  total  population  of  18,801,906. 
'  The  rate  for  larceny  is  based  on  the  reports  of  6  cities  with  a  total  population  of  10,219,176. 

*  Includes  the  District  of  Columbia. 


Table  7— NUMBER  OF  CITIES  IN  EACH  POPULATION  GROUP,  GEO- 
GRAPHIC DIVISION,  AND  STATE  REPRESENTED  IN  THE  URBAN 
CRIME  RATE  TABULATIONS  FOR  JANUARY-JUNE  1953  (TABLES 

4-6) 


Total 

Population  group 

Division  and  State 

Over 
250,000 

100,000 

to 
250,000 

50,000 

to 
100,000 

25,000 

to 
50,000 

10,000 

to 
25,000 

Less 
than 
10,000 

TOTAL: 

Population,  78,609,955 _-. 

2,454 
172 

40 

66 

121 

240 

653 

1,334 

New  England: 

Population  6  230  070 

1 

11 

17 

32 

63 

48 

25 
16 
89 
15 
14 
13 

522 

4 

2 
1 

11 
1 
2 

10 
2 

14 
2 
3 
1 

44 

3 
7 
43 
4 
5 
1 

137 

6 

6 

1 

6 

14 

8 

1 

3 

11 

Middle  Atlantic: 

Population  20  873,511        --- 

7 

12 

23 

299 

138 
165 
219 

597 

2 
3 
2 

9 

4 
4 
4 

10 

7 
6 
10 

29 

14 
16 
14 

63 

40 
42 
55 

144 

71 

94 

134 

East  North  Central: 

Population  18  638,366           

342 

156 
78 
117 
166 
80 

274 

1 
1 
1 
5 
1 

5 

1 
4 
2 
3 

8 
4 
7 
6 
4 

9 

14 
9 
9 
19 
12 

19 

38 
18 
33 
41 
14 

73 

94 

42 

65 

Ohio        

92 

49 

West  North  Central : 

Population  6  201082          _  - 

4 

164 

64 
51 
66 
42 
25 
11 
15 

247 

1 
2 

1 

4 

1 

7 
2 
3 
4 

10 
20 
15 
15 
6 
3 
4 

58 

42 

26 

2 

2 

1 

45 

2 
1 

19 



17 

2 
1 

27 

6 

1 
18 

9 

South  Atlantic: 

Population,  7,621,911 

3 

.    9 

132 

5 
1 
49 
34 
17 
58 
26 
38 
19 

98 

1 

4 

District  of  Columbia 

1 

Florida              -  --- 

3 
1 

2 
3 

7 
4 
2 
5 
1 
5 
3 

12 

10 
8 
6 

16 
6 
9 
3 

24 

27 

1 
1 

17 

g 

1 

5 
2 
3 
3 

4 

31 

17 

3 

18 

10 

East  South  Central : 

Population  3,042,748     .    

3 

5 

50 

Alabama             -  

29 
30 
14 
25 

163 

1 
1 

2 

1 
2 

1 

3 
3 
3 
3 

10 

8 
6 
5 
5 

51 

14 

18 

5 

1 

4 

3 

8 

13 

West  South  Central: 

Population,  5,268,420          

8 

82 

24 
21 

34 

84 

129 

1 
2 
2 
3 

2 

2 
2 
2 
4 

10 

5 

6 

14 

26 

22 

16 

1 

10 

16 

Texas        

3 

1 

8 
3 

40 

Mountain: 

Population,  2,095,646          --- 

91 

16 
30 
19 
14 
4 
13 
19 
14 

252 

1 

1 
1 
2 
3 
1 

14 

Colorado . 

1 

1 

7 
6 
3 
_. 

1 
4 

81 

20 

Idaho        -  -- 

11 

8 

Nevada 

3 

New  Mexico      -- 

1 
1 

11 

Utah 

1 

1 
1 

23 

15 

Wyoming 

9 

Pacific : 

Population,  8,638,201-... .._ 

7 

5 

10 

•          126 

California 

182 
31 
39 

5 

1 
1 

3 

10 

16 
2 

5 

63 
8 
10 

85 

Oregon              -. 

20 

Washington _. 

2 

21 

10 


Rural  Crime  Rates,  January-June  1953 

The  number  of  offenses  reported  by  the  law  enforcement  officers  in 
the  rural  areas  and  the  rate  per  100,000  population  are  based  on  the 
reports  of  1,546  sheriffs,  132  rural  village  officers  and  10  State  police 
with  a  combined  rural  population  of  39,692,574. 

Offenses  against  the  person  in  urban  areas  were  71.3  percent  greater 
than  in  the  rural  areas,  although  the  murder  rates  were  very  similar, 
2.34  for  the  rural  areas,  and  2.35  for  the  urban  areas. 

For  offenses  against  property,  the  individual  rates  show  more  varia- 
tion. The  rural  rate  for  these  offenses  is  275.2;  the  urban  rate  804.3, 
or  almost  three  times  greater. 

In  comparing  the  rural  areas  with  the  urban  areas,  it  should  be 
noted  that  the  reporting  in  the  rural  areas  is  probably  not  quite  as 
complete  as  that  from  the  urban  areas,  and  in  some  instances  reports 
used  in  preparing  the  rural  data  may  be  taken  from  arrest  records. 
The  reports  were  carefully  analyzed  for  this  before  tabulations  were 
prepared  and  all  that  were  recognized  as  such  were  eliminated. 

Table  8.— RURAL  CRIME  RATES,  JANUARY-JUNE  1953 

[Offenses  known  and  rate  per  100,000  inhabitants,  as  reported  by  1,M6  sheriffs,  132  rural  village  officers,  and 
10  State  police;  total  rural  population  39,692,574,  based  on  1950  decermial  census] 


Offenses  known 


Offense 


Murder  and  nonnegligent  manslaughter 

Manslaughter  by  negligence. 

Rape 

Robbery 

Aggravated  assault 

Burglary— breaking  or  entering., 

Larcency — theft 

Auto  theft... 


OFFENSES  IN  INDIVIDUAL  AREAS 

Offenses  in  Individual  Cities  With  More  Than  25,000  Inhabitants 

The  number  of  offenses  reported  as  having  been  committed  during 
the  period  of  January-June,  1953,  is  shown  in  table  9.  The  com- 
pilation includes  the  reports  received  from  police  departments  in 
cities  with  more  than  25,000  inhabitants.  Police  administrators  and 
other  interested  individuals  will  probably  find  it  desirable  to  compare 
the  crime  rates  of  their  cities  with  the  average  rates  shown  in  tables 
4,  5,  and  6  of  this  publication.  Similarly,  they  will  doubtless  desire 
to  make  comparisons  with  the  figures  for  their  communities  for  prior 
periods,  in  order  to  determine  whether  there  has  been  an  increase  or 
a  decrease  in  the  amount  of  crime  committed. 

Caution  should  be  exercised  in  comparing  crime  data  for  individual 
cities  because  the  differences  in  the  figures  may  be  due  to  a  variety  of 
factors.  Such  comparisons  are  not  necessarily  significant  even  though 
the  figures  for  individual  communities  are  converted  into  terms  of  the 
number  of  offenses  per  100,000  inhabitants. 

The  following  is  a  list  of  some  of  the  factors  which  affect  the  amount 
of  crime  in  the  community: 

Population  of  the  city  and  metropolitan  area  adjacent  thereto. 

The  composition  of  the  population  with  reference  particularly  to 
age,  sex,  and  race. 

The  economic  status  and  activities  of  the  population. 

Climate. 

Educational,  recreational,  and  religious  facilities. 

The  number  of  police  employees  per  unit  of  population. 

The  standards  governing  appointments  to  the  police  force. 

The  policies  of  the  prosecuting  officials  and  the  courts. 

The  attitude  of  the  public  toward  law-enforcement  problems. 

The  degree  of  efficiency  of  the  local  law-enforcement  agency. 

The  figures  presented  in  the  following  tabulation  are  those  reported 
by  the  individual  police  departments  in  the  cities  represented  without 
reducing  the  data  to  crime  rates  (number  of  offenses  per  100,000 
inhabitants). 

In  considering  the  volume  of  crime  committed  locally,  it  is  generally 
more  important  to  determine  whether  the  figures  for  a  given  com- 
munity show  increases  or  decreases  rather  than  to  ascertain  whether 
they  exceed  or  fall  short  of  those  for  some  other  individual  community, 
and  it  should  be  remembered  that  the  amount  of  crime  committed  in  a 
community  is  not  solely  chargeable  to  the  police  but  is  rather  a  charge 
against  the  entire  community. 

In  publishing  these  figures  the  F.  B.  I.  acts  as  a  service  agency.  The 
figures  published  are  those  submitted  by  the  contributing  agencies. 

(11) 


12 


Table  9.— NUMBER  OF  OFFENSES  KNOWN  TO  THE  POLICE,  JANU- 
ARY-JUNE 1953,  CITIES  OVER  25,000  IN  POPULATION 


City 


Abilene,  Tex 

Abington,  Pa.. 

Akron,  Ohio 

Alameda,  Calif- 
Albany,  Qa 


Albany,  N.Y 

Albuquerque,  N.  Mex. 

Alexandria,  La 

Alexandria,  Va 

Alhambra,  Calif 


Aliquippa,  Pa. 
Allentown,  Pa. 
Alliance,  Ohio. 

Alton,  111 

Altoona,  Pa 


Amarillo,  Tex 

Amsterdam,  N.  Y. 

Anderson,  Ind 

Ann  Arbor,  Mich. 
Anniston,  Ala 


Appleton,  Wis... 
Arlington,  Mass. 

Arlington,  Va 

Asheville,  N.  C. 
Ashland,  Ky 


Athens,  Ga 

Atlanta,  Ga 

Atlantic  City,  N.  J. 

Auburn,  N.  Y 

Augusta,  Ga 


Aurora,  111 

Austin,  Tex 

Bakersfield,  Calif. 

Baltimore,  Md 

Bangor,  Maine 


Barberton,  Ohio 

Baton  Rouge,  La 

Battle  Creek,  Mich. 

Bay  City,  Mich 

Bayonne,  N.  J 


Beaumont,  Tex 

Belleville,  111 

Belleville,  N.J 

Bellingham,  Wash. 
Belmont,  Mass 


Beloit,  Wis 

Belvedere,  Calif. 
Berkeley,  Calif... 

Berwyn,  111 

Bessemer,  Ala 


Bethlehem,  Pa 

Beverly,  Mass 

Beverly  Hills,  Calif. 

Billings,  Mont 

Biloxi,  Miss 


Binghamton,  N.  Y. 
Birmingham,  Ala.. 
Bloomfield,  N.  J... 
Bloomington,  111... 
Bloomington,  Ind.. 


Boise,  Idaho 

Boston,  Mass 

Bremerton,  Wash. 
Bridgeport,  Conn. 
Bristol,  Conn 


Mur- 
der, 
nonneg- 
ligent 
man- 
slaugh- 
ter 


Rob- 
bery 


2 
1 
105 
12 
2 

11 
24 

23 
13 

1 

10 
2 
3 

5 


Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


122 
17 


24 

12 

432 


79 


138 
3 


140 
3 
35 


Bur- 
glary— 
break- 
ing or 
entering 


54 
505 
45 
65 


Larceny-theft 


Over 
$50 


49 
25 
209 
18 
41 


15  133  51 

21  235  56 

Onlv  4  months  received 

98 

1 

11 


No  reports  received 


Only  5  months  received 


154 
8 

760 
1 

3 
33 
14 


32 


339 

184 

2,604 

26 

17 
169 
72 
53 
97 

224 
21 
41 
40 
18 

36 
203 
229 

48 
52 


41 
20 
No  reports  received 
4  I  98  I  155 

Only  4  months  received 


Under 
$50 


325 

36 

1,200 

257 
81 

194 
421 


183 

102 

525 

137 

81 

243 

16 

11 

55 

87 

87 

290 

43 

7 

99 

48 

11 

119 

69 

22 

142 

154 

93 

465 

18 

6 

29 

64 

34 

208 

50 

58 

120 

63 

29 

217 

29 

17 

224 

27 

13 

45 

196 

205 

426 

93 

96 

221 

44 

32 

9 

42 

462 

1,113 

801 

1,956 

50 

273 

162 

201 

1 

11 

22 

63 

137 

79 

41 

100 

66 

1,101 

147 

467 

1,969 

3,453 

16 

113 

20 

83 

97 

293 

72 

315 

26 

205 

42 

159 

74 

593 

22 

72 

11 

70 

37 

76 

15 

53 

21 

155 

56 

232 

87 

608 

21 

57 

19 

41 

33 

117 

31 

63 

ived 

354  I 


96 

39 

235 

,140 

470 

847 

42 

18 

65 

37 

41 

118 

34 

34 

133 

63 

61 

323 

574 

836 

1,276 

37 

59 

302 

411 

192 

683 

30 

14 

47 

13 

Table  9.— NUMBER  OF  OFFENSES  KNOWN  TO  THE  POLICE,  JANU- 
ARY-JUNE 1953,  CITIES  OVER  25,000  IN  POPULATION— Con. 


City 


Brockton,  Mass.. 
Brookline,  Mass. . 
Brownsville,  Tex. 
Buffalo,  N.  Y.... 
Burbank,  Calif... 


Burlington,  Iowa- 
Burlington,  Vt 

Butte,  Mont 

Cambridge,  Mass. 
Camden,  N.  J 


Canton,  Ohio 

Cedar  Rapids,  Iowa- 
Champaign,  111 

Charleston,  S.  C 

Charleston,  W.  Va-. 


Charlotte,  N.  C 

Charlottesville,  Va.. 
Chattanooga,  Teim- 

Chelsea,  Mass 

Chester,  Pa 


Cheyenne,  Wyo-- 

Chicago,  111 

Chicopee,  Mass.- 

Cicero,  111 

Cincinnati,  Ohio- 


Clarksburg,  W.  Va 

Cleveland,  Ohio 

Cleveland  Heights,  Ohio- 

Clifton,  N.J 

Clinton,  Iowa 


Colorado  Springs,  Colo. 

Columbia,  Mo 

Columbia,  S.  C 

Columbus,  Ga 

Columbus,  Ohio 


Compton,  Calif 

Concord,  N.  H. 

Corpus  Christi,  Tex.. 
Council  Bluffs,  Iowa- 
Covington,  Ky 


Cranston,  R.  I 

Cumberland,  Md 

Cuyahoga  Falls,  Ohio- 

Dallas,  Tex 

Danville,  111 


Danville,  Va 

Davenport,  Iowa 

Dayton,  Ohio 

Daytona  Beach,  Fla- 
Dearborn,  Mich 


Decatur,  111 

Denver,  Colo 

Des  Moines,  Iowa. 

Detroit,  Mich 

Dubuque,  lowa... 


Duiuth,  Minn 

Durham,  N.  C 

East  Chicago,  Ind 

East  Cleveland,  Ohio- 
East  Hartford,  Conn.. 


Mur- 
der, 
nonneg- 
ligent 
man- 
slaugh- 
ter 


128 


Rob- 
bery 


1 
21 

14 
44 

24 
2 
5 

24 
30 

14 
1 

36 
4 

14 

3 

2,877 

23 
121 


Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


346 
7 
3 


5 
17 
108 


5 

204 

3 


4 

12 

103 

11 


1 

2 

82 

44 

216 

13 

70 

1 

15 


Bur- 
glary— 
break- 
ing or 
entering 


100 

76 
87 
482 
173 

16 
57 
76 
115 

277 

168 
63 
56 
258 
146 

246 
16 

300 
27 


Larceny-theft 


Over 


56 
22 
28 
223 
189 

6 

42 
66 
110 
142 

99 
56 
34 
175 


(') 


(') 


4  46  42 

2, 051         6, 264         4, 972 

No  reports  received 

27 

153 


No  reports  received 
64 
33 
215 


7 

1 

127 

1 

37 

1 
3 


422 
1 


57 

6 

128 


Only  5  months  received 


Under 
$50 


185 
83 
255 
696 
615 

104 
160 
205 
138 
245 

431 
315 
84 
602 
492 

596 
73 

378 
35 
46 

305 
5,223 


106 

65 

121 

633 

564 

1,291 

38 

13 

32 

1,020 

518 

4,933 

27 

11 

92 

53 

44 

101 

21 

18 

122 

113 

76 

252 

181 

184 

594 

144 

110 

282 

861 

704 

1,524 

313 

31 

456 

24 

17 

69 

412 

179 

799 

52 

36 

213 

116 

61 

197 

54 

52 

102 

42 

21 

71 

27 

15 

67 

2,410 

505 

5,079 

74 

27 

52 

116 

64 

169 

143 

102 

432 

365 

167 

879 

12 

11 

168 

124 

815 

6 

1 

108 

46 

227 

221 

122 

1,595 

783 

2,  295 

27 

20 

412 

241 

717 

1,104 

1,876 

3,899 

1,431 

9,567 

1 

43 

14 

111 

11 

4 

92 

101 

366 

8 

220 

134 

87 

228 

12 

8 

93 

105 

206 

3 

3 

62 

15 

118 

1 

71 

34 

82 

See  footnotes  at  end  of  table. 


14 


Table  9.— NUMBER  OF  OFFENSES  KNOWN  TO  THE  POLICE,  JANU- 
ARY-JUNE 1953,  CITIES  OVER  25,000  IN  POPULATION— Con. 


City 


East  Orange,  N.  J 

East  Providence,  R.  I 

East  St.  Louis,  111 

Easton,  Pa 

Eau  Claire,  Wis 


El  Paso,  Tex._.. 
Elgin,  Illinois... 
Elizabeth,  N.  J. 
Elkhart,  Ind... 
Elmira,  N.  Y 


Elyria,  Ohio.. 
Enid,  Okla-... 

Erie,  Pa 

Euclid,  Ohio.. 
Eugene,  Oreg. 


Evanston,  111 

Evansville,  Ind... 

Everett,  Mass 

Everett,  Wash 

Fairmont,  W.  Va. 


Fall  River,  Mass... 

Fargo,  N.  Dak 

Fayetteville,  N.  C. 

Ferndale,  Mich 

Fitchburg,  Mass... 


Flint,  Mich 

Fond  du  Lac,  Wis 

Fort  Dodge,  Iowa 

Fort  Lauderdale,  Fla. 
Fort  Smith,  Ark.. 


Fort  Wayne,  Ind... 

Fort  Worth,  Tex 

Framingham,  Mass. 

Fresno,  Calif 

Gadsden,  Ala __ 


Gainesville,  Fla. 
Galesburg,  Dl... 
Galveston,  Tex.. 
Garfleld,  N.  J... 
Gary,  Ind 


Glendale,  Calif 

Gloucester,  Mass 

Grand  Forks,  N.  Dak. 
Grand  Rapids,  Mich.. 
Granite  City,  111 


Great  Falls,  Mont. 

Green  Bay,  Wis 

Greensboro,  N.  C.. 
Greenville,  Miss... 
Greenville,  S.  C... 


Greenwich,  Conn. 
Hackcnsack,  N.  J. 
Hagcrstown,  Md.. 
Hamilton,  N.  J... 
Hamilton,  Ohio... 


Hammond,  Ind 

Hampton,  Va 

Hamtramck,  Mich. 

Harrisburg,  Pa 

Hartford,  Conn 


Hattiesburg,  Miss. 

Haverford,  Pa 

Haverhill,  Mass.... 

Hazleton,  Pa 

Hempstead,  N.  Y.. 


Mur- 
der, 
nonneg- 
ligent 
man- 
slaugh- 
ter 


Rob- 
bery 


Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


185 
1 
2 

34 


Bur- 
glary— 
break- 
ing or 
entering 


184 
32 

154 
36 
25 

344 
23 

179 
49 
95 

49 
38 
129 
26 
53 

84 

373 

47 

93 


Larceny-theft 


Over 

$50 


81 
29 
55 
18 
14 

212 
15 

121 
38 
49 

31 
12 

()4 
4 
79 

95 

208 

27 

66 


Only  3  months  received 


124 


No  reports  received 


No  reports  received 
1  13  I  16 

138  472  259 

4  243  !  145 

Only  4  months  received 


7 
1 

7 

1 

182 

Only  2  months  received 

16 


Under 
$50 


177 
119 
168 
76 
72 

795 
73 

310 
56 

157 

63 
118 
329 
110 
225 

227 

698 

71 

294 


119 

95 

255 

38 

19 

149 

56 

39 

293 

72 

33 

102 

73 

37 

168 

315 

331 

870 

12 

14 

165 

11 
6 

4 

38 

169 
94 

133 

45 

272 
170 

15 

105 

1 

48 
8 

15 
61 

140 

1,050 

14 

430 

56 

122 
239 

17 
194 

15 

420 

2.060 

34 

565 

87 

25 
35 

21 
3 

59 
50 

34 

8 

125 
50 

i 

49 
654 


663 


25 

13 

159 

275 

115 

873 

60 

6 

96 

26 

47 

90 

45 

33 

77 

177 

136 

240 

238 

130 

281 

27 

14 

39 

48 

31 

71 

75 

34 

191 

68 

52 

140 

99 

70 

169 

133 

210 

397 

141 

122 

254 

67 

.59 

115 

233 

122 

213 

379 

272 

580 

48 

12 

31 

46 

23 

61 

43 

15 

60 

18 

3 

23 

68 

56 

61 

15 


Table  9.— NUMBER  OF  OFFENSES  KNOWN  TO  THE  POLICE,  JANU- 
ARY-JUNE 1953,  CITIES  OVER  25,000  IN  POPULATION— Con. 


City 


High  Point,  N.  C 

Highland  Park,  Mich. 

Hoboken,  N.  J 

Holyoke,  Mass 

Honolulu  City,  T.  H.. 


Hot  Springs,  Ark 

Houston,  Tex 

Himtington,  W.  Va 

Huntington  Park,  Calif. 
Hutchinson,  Kans 


Independence,  Mo. 
Indianapolis,  Ind.. 
Inglewood,  Calif... 

Iowa  City,  Iowa 

Irondequoit,  N.  Y. 


Irvington,  N.  J. 
Ithaca,  N.  Y._.. 
Jackson,  Mich.. 
Jackson,  Miss... 
Jackson,  Tenn.. 


Jacksonville,  Fla 

Jamestown,  N.  Y... 
Jefferson  City,  Mo__. 

Jersey  City,  N.  J 

Johnson  City,  Tenn. 


Johnstown,  Pa 

^oliet,  HI 

/oplin,  Mo 

'alamazoo,  Mich. 
-,ankakee,  111 


Kannapolis,  N.  C 
Kansas  City,  Kans. 
Kansas  City,  Mo... 

Kearny,  N.  J 

Kenosha,  Wis 


Key  West,  Fla._. 
Kingston,  N.  Y__ 
Knoxville,  Tenn. 

Kokomo,  Ind 

La  Crosse,  Wis... 


La  Grange,  Ga 

Lackawanna,  N.  Y_ 

LaPayette,  Ind 

Lafayette,  La 

Lake  Charles,  La... 


Lakeland,  Fla 

Lakewood,  Ohio. 

Lancaster,  Pa 

Lansing,  Mich... 
Laredo,  Tex 


Laurel,  Miss 

Lawrence,  Mass.. 

Lawton,  Okla 

Lebanon,  Pa 

Lewiston,  Maine. 


Lexington,  Ky 

Lima,  Ohio 

Lincoln,  Nebr 

Lincoln  Park,  Mich. 
Linden,  N.  J 


Little  Kock,  Ark 

Lockport,  N.  Y 

Long  Beach,  Calif.. 

Lorain,  Ohio 

Los  Angeles,  Calif 

See  footnote  at  end  of  table. 
268455°— 53 3 


Mur- 
der, 
nonneg- 
ligent 
man- 
slaugh- 
ter 


Rob- 
bery 


5 
133 
6 
16 
4 

3 

169 

21 

1 

2 


Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


147 

5 

1,366 


47 
12 
20 
3 
31 

33 

113 

61 

4 

4 


160 
11 


50 

37 

247 

1 

2 


Bur- 
glary— 
break- 
ing or 
entering 


56 
620 


53 
2,406 


149 
64 


215 
16 
25 

152 
33 
61 

159 


729 
66 
14 

381 

82 

55 
43 
135 
91 
20 

25 

255 

941 

40 

50 


Larceny-theft 


Over 
$50 


40 
34 
106 


35 
821 
147 

12 


52 
49 
76 
50 
18 

596 
27 
13 

119 
21 

45 
34 

75 


19 
115 
738 
34 
54 


No  reports  received 
II  53  I  19 

51  I         243  I  134 

No  reports  received 


Under 
$50 


No  reports  received 


No  reports  received 


No  reports  received 


107 

300 

66 

104 

1,484 

25 
2,416 
208 
255 
173 

116 
1,593 

298 
52 
51 

148 
106 
245 
278 
107 

1,271 

68 

48 

272 

64 

130 
42 
106 
457 
38 

84 

568 

1.523 

67 

99 


61 
242 


Auto 
theft 


23 

13 

354 

44 

9 

71 

52 

16 

40 

53 

57 

198 

8 

51 

39 

63 

25 

119 

66 

94 

2 

51 

16 

166 

19 

50 

24 

210 

6 

86 

56 

396 

24 

75 

36 

134 

1 

58 

5 

46 

2 

54 

25 

189 

12 

120 

28 

180 

2 

1 

29 

15 

129 

39 

145 

244 

128 

295 

10 

38 

128 

40 

267 

4 

9 

95 

77 

504 

2 

55 

36 

101 

5 

386 

265 

631 

3 

26 

9 

35 

77 

951 

(') 

1,717 

9 

77 

54 

91 

2,055 

6,378 

6,742 

10,281 

16 

Table  9.— NUMBER  OF  OFFENSES  KNOWN  TO  THE  POLICE,  JANU- 
ARY-JUNE 1953,  CITIES  OVER  25,000  IN  POPULATION— Con. 


City 


Louisville,  Ky 

Lowell,  Mass 

Lower  Merion,  Pa. 

Lubbock,  Tex 

Lynchburg,  Va 


Lynn,  Mass 

Lynwood,  Calif. 

Macon,  Ga 

Madison,  Wis... 
Maiden,  Mass. . 


Manchester,  N.  H. 
Manitowoc,  Wis. . 
Mansfield,  Ohio... 
Maple  wood,  N.  J.. 
Marion,  Ind 


Marion,  Ohio 

Mason  City,  Iowa. 

Massillon,  Ohio 

May  wood.  111. 

McKeesport,  Pa... 


Medford,  Mass.. 
Melrose,  Mass. . 
Memphis,  Tenn. 
Meriden,  Conn.. 
Meridian,  Miss.. 


Miami,  Fla 

Miami  Beach,  Fla.. 
Michigan  City,  Ind. 
Middletown,  Conn.. 
Middletown,  Ohio. . 


Milwaukee,  Wis 

Mirineapolis,  Minn. 

Mishawaka,  Ind 

Mobile,  Ala 

Moline,  111 


Monroe,  La 

Montelair,  N.  J 

Montgomery,  Ala 

Morgantown,  W.  Va.. 
Mount  Lebanon,  Pa.. 

Mount  Vernon,  N.  Y. 

Muncie,  Ind 

Muskegon,  Mich 

Muskogee,  Okla 

Nashua,  N.  H_ 


Nashville,  Tenn . 

New  Albany,  Ind 

New  Bedford,  Mass... 
New  Britain,  Conn . . . 
New  Brunswick,  N.  J. 


New  Castle,  Pa 

New  Haven,  Conn... 
New  Kensington,  Pa. 
New  London,  Conn.. 
New  Orleans,  La 


New  Rochelle,  N.  Y. 

New  York,  N.  Y 

Newark,  N.  J 

Newark,  Ohio 

Newburgh,  N.  Y 


Newport,  Ky 

Newport,  R.  1. 

Newport  News,  Va. 

Newton,  Mass 

Niagara  Falls,  N.  Y. 


Mur- 
der, 
nonneg- 
ligent 
man- 
slaugh- 
ter 


Rob- 
bery 


144 
15 


243 

8 
10 
19 

7 

16 
19 
21 
6 
1 


117 
3 


190 
13 
3 
1 
6 

62 
162 


59 
2 
9 
4 
5 

10 
13 
1 
2 
189 

2 

4,162 

245 

1 

4 

4 
3 
5 
2 
11 


Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


330 


Bur- 
glary— 
break- 
ing or 
entering 


1,267 

108 

131 

452 

74 

261 
97 
291 
115 
32 

49 
38 
96 
22 
28 

67 
14 
27 
31 


62 

21 

679 

60 


Larceny-theft 


Over 

$50 


944 
46 
59 

164 
19 

104 
67 

124 
68 
24 

23 
11 
47 
5 
15 

39 
1-9 
4 
11 
60 

28 

5 

417 

12 


Under 
$50 


1,208 
139 
165 
654 
163 

361 
144 
330 
357 
95 

134 
129 
173 
15 
148 

134 

85 
148 

55 
134 

134 
40 

612 
61 


Only  4  months  received 

182 
8 
11 


129 
32 
4 
95 


7 
1 

19 
Only  5  months  received 


23 

3 

2 

243 

7 

4,321 

375 


1,250 

592 

1,077 

264 

48:3 

434 

49 

60 

212 

19 

16 

53 

73 

39 

181 

364 

787 

1,996 

1, 036 

656 

1,849 

37 

24 

98 

443 

105 

392 

53 

39 

125 

81 

26 

152 

28 

40 

90 

244 

111 

345 

15 

16 

26 

9 

8 

22 

60 

61 

73 

125 

79 

332 

114 

77 

196 

37 

20 

74 

391 

281 

580 

21 

35 

116 

141 

104 

454 

87 

49 

124 

66 

21 

166 

31 

39 

78 

294 

132 

394 

22 

20 

27 

55 

33 

88 

741 

610 

1,263 

51 

61 

68 

21,481 

1 '.1,608 

14,536 

1,602 

649 

1,463 

55 

46 

178 

28 

42 

100 

43 

42 

73 

54 

25 

150 

137 

152 

390 

132 

83 

263 

95 

80 

127 

17 


Table  9.— NUMBER  OF  OFFENSES  KNOWN  TO  THE  POLICE,  JANU- 
ARY-JUNE 1953,  CITIES  OVER  25,000  IN  POPULATION— Con. 


City 


Norfolk,  Va 

Norman,  Okla 

Norristown,  Pa 

North  Bergen,  N.  J 

North  Little  Rock,  Ark- 


Northampton,  Mass- 

Norwalk,  Conn 

Norwich,  Conn 

Norwood,  Ohio 

Nutley,  N.J 


Oak  Park,  111 

Oak  Ridge,  Tenn_ 
Oakland,  Calif. _.. 

Odessa,  Tex 

Ogden,  Utah 


Oklahoma  City,  Okla_ 

Omaha,  Nebr 

Orange,  N  J 

Orlando,  Fla 

Oshkosh,  Wis 


Ottumwa,  Iowa 

Owensboro,  Ky 

Paducah,  Ky 

Palo  Alto,  Calif.... 
Panama  City,  Fla. 


Parkersburg,  W.  Va. 

Parma,  Ohio 

Pasadena,  Calif 

Passaic,  N.  J 

Paterson,  N.  J 


Pawtucket,  R.  I 

Pensacola,  Fla 

Peoria,  111 

Perth  Amboy,  N.  J. 
Petersburg,  Va 


Philadelphia,  Pa. 

Phoenix,  Ariz 

Pine  Bluff,  Ark.. 
Pittsburgh,  Pa._. 
Pittsfield,  Mass.. 


Plainfield,  N.J... 
Pocatello,  Idaho.. 

Pomona,  Calif 

Pontiac,  Mich 

Port  Arthur,  Tex. 


Port  Huron,  Mich. 
Portland,  Maine... 

Portland,  Oreg 

Portsmouth,  Ohio. 
Portsmouth,  Va 


Poughkeepsie,  N.  Y. 

Providence,  R.  I 

Provo,  Utah 

Pueblo,  Colo 

Quincy,  111. 


Quincy,  Mass 

Racine,  Wis 

Raleigh,  N.  C 

Rapid  City,  S.  Dak. 
Reading,  Pa 


Redondo  Beach,  Calif 

Redwood  City,  Calif 

Reno,  Nev 

Revere,  Mass 

Richmond,  CaUf. 

See  footnotes  at  end  of  table. 


Mur- 
der, 
noniieg- 
ligent 
man- 
slaugh- 
ter 


Rob- 
bery 


Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


Bur- 
glary— 
break- 
ing or 
entering 


Larceny-theft 


Over 

$50 


304 
5 
14 

82 
40 

10 
1 


43 
4 
19 

997 

85 

8 

229 


1 

4 

112 

22 

19 

1 
25 


Only  5  months  received 


Only  2  months  received 
131 


Only  5  months  received 


034 
41 
14 

123 
1 


10 
5 

47 
10 

9 
4 

88 

7 

167 

17 
35 


11 
1 

5 

3 

110 


29 
69 

4, 938 
666 
125 

1,149 
69 

66 
52 
138 
152 
25 

36 

118 

1,134 

106 


75 
626 

49 
314 
116 

117 
79 

148 
49 
90 


168 
79 
256 


(2) 


Under 
$50 


172  575  936  696         1,127 

Only  1  month  received 
2  I  4  I  33  1  23  I  44 

No  reports  received 
No  reports  received 


4 

21 

37 

61 

32 

82 

21 

15 

40 

47 

7 

45 

54 
10 

40 

7 

100 
46 

23 

144 

1,364 

227 

3, 302 

8 

61 

67 

313 

14 

143 

117 

578 

62 

911 

598 

1,449 

10 

364 

103 

848 

243 

183 

313 

34 

20 

317 

24 

2 

98 

67 

45 

229 

109 

67 

100 

46 

83 

227 

25 

38 

55 

41 

65 

68 

40 

17 

61 

272 

205 

729 

71 

35 

51 

290 

31 

333 

00 

321 

100 

534 

.34 

95 

60 

241 

294 

1,442 

64 

82 

577 

491 

22 

54 

51 

204 

53 

264 

79 

288 

04 

285 

15 

125 

20 

191 

f)3 

292 

797 

1,986 

72 

221 

160 

403 

36 

136 

288 

792 

20 

267 

168 

463 

47 

126 

45 

187 

41 

300 

75 

318 

26 

105 

65 

296 

18 

137 

.53 

203 

145 

258 

39 

96 

101 

1,132 

18 


Table  9.— NUMBER  OF  OFFENSES  KNOWN   TO  THE  POLICE,  JANU- 
ARY-JUNE  1953,  CITIES  OVER  25,000  IN  POPULATION— Con. 


City 


Richmond,  Ind  . 
Richmond,  Va,.. 
Riverside,  Calif.. 

Roanoke,  Va 

Rochester,  Minn. 


Rochester,  N.  Y 

Rock  Island,  111 

Rockford,  111 

Rocky  Mount,  N.  C 
Rome,  Qa 


Rome,  N.  Y 

Roswell,  N.  Mex.. 
Royal  Oak,  Mich. 
Sacramento,  Calif. 
Saginaw,  Mich 


St.  Cloud,  Minn.... 

St.  .loseph.  Mo 

St.  Louis,  Mo 

St.  Paul,  Minn 

St.  Petersburg,  Fla. 


Salem,  Mass 

Salem,  Oreg 

Salina,  Kans 

Salt  Lake  City,  Utah. 
San  Angelo,  Tex 


San  Antonio,  Tex 

San  Bernardino,  Calif 

San  Diego,  Calif 

San  Francisco.  Calif... 
San  Jose,  Calif... 


San  Leandro,  Calif... 

San  Mateo,  Calif 

Sandusky,  Ohio 

Santa  Ana,  Calif 

Santa  Barbara.  Calif 


Santa  Fe,  N.  Mex... 
Santa  Monica,  Calif. 

Savannah,  Qa 

Schenectady,  N.  Y.. 
Scranton,  Pa 


Seattle,  Wash 

Shaker  Heights,  Ohio 
Sharon,  Pa 

Sheboygan,  Wis 

Shreveport,  La 


Sioux  City.  Iowa 

Sioux  Falls,  S.  Dak. 

Somerville,  Mass 

South  Bend,  Ind.... 
South  Gate.  Calif. . . 


Spartanburg,  S.  C. 
Sjjokane,  Wash. .. 

Springfield,  III 

Springfield,  Mass. 
Springfield,  Mo  .. 


Springfield,  Ohio... 

Stamford,  Conn 

Steubenville,  Ohio. 

Stockton,  Calif 

Stratford,  Conn 


Superior,  Wis 

Syracuse,  N.  Y.. 
Taconia,  Wash... 
Tallahassee,  Fla. 
Tampa,  Fla 


Mur- 
der, 
nonneg- 
ligent 
man- 
slaugh- 
ter 


Rob- 
bery 


4 
124 
16 


Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


5 

120 

13 

22 


3 

629 

58 

12 

2 
3 
4 

23 
2 


Bur- 
glary- 
break  - 
ing  or 
entering 


53 
573 
104 
106 

33 

401 
63 

145 
44 

47 


Larceny-theft 


Over 

$50 


60 
482 
123 
105 

23 

239 
56 

77 
38 
25 


1  24  31 

Only  2  months  received 

1 
36 
73 


Under 

$50 


12 

1,076 

22 


Only  3  months  received 


Only  2  months  received 

21 

235 

3 

12 


15 

3 

32 

120 


63 

1,241 

387 

363 

59 


178 


138 

58 


67  1 


97 

16 

216 

405 

508 

1,092 

108 

69 

545 

4 

15 

80 

123 

37 

307 

468 

870 

3,830 

620 

218 

1,483 

243 

177 

307 

90 

19 

93 

63 

32 

242 

62 

24 

195 

406 

268 

1,228 

111 

20 

149 

37 

22 

285 

181 

407 

113 

58 

713 

886 

1,611 

650 

341 

2,635 

912 

4,321 

23 

8 

243 

46 

919 

5 

2 

87 

55 

242 

4 

2 

48 

60 

311 

1 

12 

32 

28 

134 

8 

1 

88 

77 

305 

7 

10 

110 

60 

429 

278 

285 

652 

465 

250 

326 

65 

54 

117 

131 

40 

173 

1,610 

694 

2, 348 

11 

8 

108 

12 

11 

58 

35 

23 

87 

67 

157 

420 

90 

86 

425 

46 

46 

163 

180 

74 

193 

301 

173 

561 

169 

125 

237 

61 

46 

199 

280 

138 

1,043 

89 

60 

252 

125 

84 

285 

127 

68 

223 

97 

44 

285 

232 

156 

277 

70 

35 

93 

353 

311 

542 

82 

38 

75 

49 

15 

238 

393 

227 

617 

300 

250 

838 

80 

22 

127 

mi 

272 

621 

19 


Table  9.— NUMBER  OF  OFFENSES  KNOWN  TO  THE  POLICE,  JANU- 
ARY-JUNE 1953,  CITIES  OVER  25,000  IN  POPULATION— Con. 


City 


Taunton,  Mass,.. 

Teaneck,  N.J 

Temple,  Tex 

Terre  Haute,  Ind. 
Toledo,  Ohio 


Topeka,  Kans 

Torrington,  Conn. 

Trenton,  N.J 

Troy,  N.  Y 

Tucson,  Ariz 


Tulsa,  Okla 

Tuscaloosa,  Ala... 

Tyler,  Tex 

Union  City,  N.  J. 
Union,  N.  J 


University  City,  Mo. 

Upper  Darby,  Pa 

Utica,  N.  Y 

Vallejo,  Calif 

Valley  Stream,  N.  Y. 


Vancouver,  Wash. 
Vicksburg,  Miss.. 
Waco,  Tex 

Waltham,  Mass... 
Warren,  Ohio 


Warwick,  R.  I 

Washington,  D.  C. 

Washington,  Pa 

Waterbury,  Conn.. 
Waterloo,  Iowa 


Watertown,  Mass. 
Watertown,  N.  Y. 

Waukegan,  111 

Wausau,  Wis 

Wauwatosa,  Wis.. 


West  Allis,  Wis 

West  Hartford,  Conn.. 

West  Haven,  Conn 

West  New  York,  N.  J. 
West  Orange,  N.J 


West  Palm  Beach,  Fla. 

Weymouth,  Mass 

Wheeling,  W.  Va 

White  Plains,  N.  Y 

Wichita,  Kans 


Wichita  Falls,  Tex. 
Wilkes  Barre,  Pa... 
Wilkinsburg,  Pa... 
Williamsport,  Pa... 
Wilmington,  Del.. . 


Wilmington,  N.  C 

Winona,  Minn 

\rmston- Salem,  N.  C. 

Woodbridge,  N.  J 

Woonsocket,  R.  I 


Worcester,  Mass. . 
Wyandotte,  Mich. 

Yakima,  Wash 

Yonkers,  N.  Y 

York,  Pa 


Youngstown,  Ohio. 
Zanesville,  Ohio 


Mur- 
der, 
nonneg- 
ligent 
man- 
slaugh- 
ter 


Rob- 
bery 


33 


4 

5 

109 


Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


17 

4 

146 


Bur- 
glary- 
break  - 
ing  or 
entering 


36 
63 
54 
101 

588 


Larceny-theft 


Over 
$50 


16 
16 
25 
73 
535 


37  207  82 

Only  5  months  received 


Under 
$50 


Complete  data  not  received 
3 
7 


493 
1 


2 
3 
105 
1 
4 


2,165 
"'""25' 


Complete  data  not  received 


109 
3 

7 
2 
10 


128 
No  reports  received 


148 
30 
91 

273 
1,426 

393 


30 

40 

304 

140 

229 

7 

6 

68 

22 

56 

28 

13 

228 

94 

667 

62 

52 

565 

446 

930 

3 

83 

37 

26 

76 

89 

37 

94 

59 

27 

104 

105 

53 

92 

85 

38 

195 

121 

45 

271 

56 

41 

206 

27 

46 

89 

76 

48 

326 

47 

10 

37 

181 

79 

521 

81 

24 

127 

67 

52 

158 

92 

34 

40 

2,599 

876 

3,958 

19 

31 

65 

108 

60 

178 

88 

64 

327 

64 

22 

80 

49 

21 

127 

43 

48 

136 

15 

16 

97 

31 

14 

102 

17 

21 

144 

20 

28 

32 

18 

21 

28 

41 

21 

54 

166 

60 

208 

ports  rece 

ived 

50 

32 

36 

122 

78 

140 

406 

242 

1,109 

172 

222 

581 

62 

24 

61 

33 

16 

100 

70 

34 

178 

280 

192 

577 

132 

65 

170 

15 

20 

117  ! 

185 

76 

246 

2 
21 

39 
395 

70 
147 

120 
481 

5 

2 
10 

72 
139 

37 
65 

137 
528 

2 

4 

8 

147 

70 

312 

4 

9 

62 

44 

270 

39 

9 

169 

220 

492 

2 

2 

45 

49 

223 

'  Larcenies  not  separately  reported.    Figure  listed  includes  both  major  and  minor  larcenies. 
2  Larceny  figures  not  available. 


POLICE  EMPLOYEE  DATA 

Police  Killed,  1952 

In  1952,  63  police  in  3,671  cities  lost  their  lives  in  performance  of 
ofRcial  duties.  The  reporting?  cities  have  a  combined  population  of 
86.6  million.  In  terms  of  population  units  of  5  million,  the  1952 
rate  of  3.64  is  an  improvement  over  the  1951  rate  of  3.81. 

Table  10  summarizes  available  data  on  police  killed  in  line  of  duty 
during  1952  and  the  data  are  arranged  by  size  of  cities  and  geographic 
location  together  with  the  death  rates  per  5  million  inhabitants. 

Tarle  10.— number  of  POLICE  DEPARTMENT  EMPLOYEES  KILLED, 
1952,  BY  GEOGRAPHIC  DIVISIONS  AND  POPULATION  GROUPS 

[Includes  only  those  employees  killed  while  on  active  duty  with  their  local  police  agencies] 


TOTAL 

Population  group 

Geographic  division 

Num- 
ber 

Rate  per 
5,000,000 
inhabi- 
tants 

Over 
250,000 

100,000 

to 
250,000 

50,000 

to 
100,000 

25,000 

to 
50,000 

10,000 

to 
25,000 

Less 
than 
10,000 

Total  number ___  ___     _     _ 

63 

19 
2.72 

6 
3.20 

5 
2.83 

9 
4.77 

10 
4.16 

14 

Rate  per  5,000,000  inhabitants 

3.64 

5.81 

New  England 

1 
6 
15 
2 

10 
11 
6 
2 
10 

.75 
1.35 
3.79 
1.45 

5.83 
14.46 
4.18 
4.10 
5.62 

1 
1 
1 

Middle  Atlantic          

3 
5 
1 

1 
2 
3 

4" 

-. 

1 

1 
4 

East  North  Central 

4 

West  North  Central 

1 

South  Atlantic. 

3 

1 

2 

1 
5 
1 

2 

1 

East  South  Central 

3 

West  South  Central     

2 

Mountain. 

1 

1 

Pacific 

1 

3 

2 

Number  of  Police  Employees,  April  30,  1953 

Reports  on  the  number  of  employees  as  of  April  30,  1953,  were  re- 
ceived from  the  police  departments  in  3,671  cities  representing  a 
combined  urban  population  of  86,614,866,  approximately  97  percent 
coverage.  The  figures  as  to  the  number  per  1,000  inhabitants  in 
cities  grouped  according  to  size  and  location  are  presented  in  table  1 1 , 
and  the  data  include  both  police  officers  and  civilian  employees. 

There  has  been  a  definite  tendency  during  recent  years  toward  the 
employment  of  civilian  personnel  for  clerical  functions  and  other 
duties  where  a  commissioned  police  officer  is  not  required.  For 
instance,  since  1947  the  number  of  employees  per  1,000  inhabitants 
has  increased  from  1.75  to  1.78.  Actually,  for  cities  with  population 
in  excess  of  50,000  the  number  of  commissioned  police  officers  per 
1,000  inhabitants  has  decreased  while  the  number  of  civilian  employees 

(20) 


21 


has  shown  definite  increases.  For  cities  under  50,000  in  population, 
substantial  increases  were  registered  in  the  figures  for  both  pohce 
officers  and  civihan  employees. 

The  extent  of  the  use  of  civilian  employees  which  incidentally  often 
effects  a  budget  savings  is  suggested  in  the  following  tabulation: 

PCTCCTlt 

Population  group:  civilian  employees 

Total,  all  cities 8.  8 

Group  I  (over  250,000) 10.  0 

Group  II  (100,000-250,000) 11.  6 

Group  III  (50,000-100,000) 9.  4 

Group  IV  (25,000-50,000) 6.  9 

Group  V  (10,000-25,000) 4.  7 

Group  VI  (2,500-10,000) 5.  2 

T.^BLE  11.— POLICE  DEPARTMENT  EMPLOYEES,  APRIL  30,  1953,  NUM- 
BER AND  RATE  PER  1,000  INHABITANTS,  BY  GEOGRAPHIC  DIVI- 
SIONS AND  POPULATION  GROUPS 

[Population  figures  from  1950  decennial  census] 


TOTAL 

Population  group 

Division 

Group 

I 

Group 
II 

Group 
III 

Group 
IV 

Group 
V 

Group 
VI 

Over 
250,000 

100,000 

to 
250,000 

50,000 

to 
100,000 

25,000 

to 
50,000 

10,000 

to 
25,000 

Less 
than 
10,000 

TOTAL: 

Number  of  police  employees 

154,  227 
1.78 

78, 037 
2.23 

15, 474 
1.65 

14, 086 
1.60 

14,  348 
1.62 

16,  707 
1.39 

15  575 

Average  number  of  employees  per  1,000 
inhabitants..    _ 

1  29 

New  England: 

Number  of  police  employees 

13,  443 

2.01 

46,  945 

2.11 

33,  592 

1.70 

9,626 

1.40 

15,  862 

1.85 

6,206 

1.37 

8,791 

1.23 

3,370 

1.38 

17,  404 

1.92 

3,052 
3.81 

30,  748 

2.50 

19,039 

2.14 

4,412 

1.84 

5,515 

2.53 

1,377 

1.26 

3,214 

1.40 

632 

1.52 

10,048 

2.21 

3,470 

2.09 
2,928 

1.84 
2,312 

1.55 
749 

1.29 
2,024 

1.  .59 
996 

1.50 
1,491 

1.29 
462 

1.60 
1,042 

1.58 

1,972 

1.89 

3,156 

1.89 

3,069 

1.46 

853 

1.27 

2,327 

1.60 

418 

1.53 

678 

1.22 

237 

1.09 

1,376 

1.65 

2,500 

1.80 

3,008 

1.74 

3,046 

1.32 

741 

1.10 

1,734 

1.67 

623 

1.40 

764 

1.24 

604 

1.50 

1,328 

1.63 

1,859 

1.45 
3,850 

1.53 
2,963 

1.25 
1,308 

1.13 
1,922 

1.67 
705 

1.37 
1,345 

1.10 
579 

1.31 
2,176 

1.61 

590 

Average  number  of  employees  per  1,000 
inhabitants _._ 

1  14 

Middle  Atlantic : 

Number  of  police  employees - 

3  255 

Average  number  of  employees  per  1,000 
inhabitants 

1  34 

East  North  Central: 

Number  of  police  employees.- 

3  l&J 

Average  number  of  employees  per  1,000 
inhabitants 

1  22 

West  North  Central : 

Average  number  of  employees  per  1,000 
inhabitants 

1  12 

South  Atlantic :  i 

Number  of  police  employees 

2,330 
1  .58 

Average  number  of  employees  per  1,000 
Inhabitants 

East  South  Central : 

Number  of  police  employees 

1,086 
1  34 

Average  number  of  employees  per  1,000 
inhabitants 

West  South  Central: 

Number  of  police  employees 

1,299 
97 

Average  number  of  employees  per  1,000 
inhabitants    ^. 

Mountain : 

Number  of  police  employees 

856 

Average  number  of  employees  per  1,000 
inhabitants .... 

1  28 

Pacific: 

Number  of  police  employees 

Average  number  of  employees  per  1,000 
inhabitants 

1,434 
1.72 

1  Includes  the  District  of  Columbia. 


22 


23 


Table  12.— NUMBER  OF  CITIES  USED  IN  TABULATIONS  REGARDING 
NUMBER  OF  POLICE  DEPARTMENT  EMPLOYEES,  APRIL  30,  1953, 
AND  POLICE  KILLED,  1952 

[Population  figures  from  1050  decennial  census] 


Division 


TOTAL: 

Population  represented 

Number  of  cities 

New  England:  Total  population, 
6,697,967 

Middle  Atlantic:  Total  popula- 
tion, 22,228,268 

East  North  Central:  Total  popu- 
lation, 19,777,295 

West  North  Central:  Total  popu- 
lation, 6,876,634 

South  Atlantic:  Total  population, 
8,571,654 

East  South  Central:  Total  popu- 
lation, 3,804,370 

West  South  Central:  Total  popu- 
lation, 7, 1 70,579 

Mountain:  Total  population, 
2,437,437 

Pacific:  Total  population, 
9,050,662 


TOTAI 


86,614,866 
3,671 


225 

721 
781 
409 
442 
221 
381 
184 
307 


Population  group 


Group  I 


Over 
250,000 


34,932,955 
41 


Group  II 


100,000 

to 
250,000 


9,364,835 
65 


Group 
III 


50,000  to 
100,000 


8,819,944 
125 


Group 
IV 


25,000  to 
50,000 


9,430,637 
269 


Group  V 


10,000  to 
25,000 


Group 
VI 


Less  than 
10,000 


12,023,554   12,042,941 
784  2, 387 


81 
161 
160 

78 
74 
34 
77 
28 
91 


79 
468 
507 
292 
306 
161 
266 
138 
170 


Police  Employees  in  Individual  Cities 

The  number  of  police  officers  and  the  number  of  civilian  employees 
as  of  April  30,  1953  are  shown  in  table  13  for  individual  cities  having 
a  population  of  25,000  and  over.  Personnel  figures  for  those  police 
departments  in  cities  having  less  than  25,000  are  presented  in  table 
14  but  the  figures  for  civilian  personnel  are  not  segregated. 

Variation  in  practices  among  cities  not  only  occurs  in  the  use  of 
civilian  employees  but  also  some  departments  indicated  then  school 
guards  were  augmented  by  school  children  or  adults  not  paid  from 
police  funds.  These  differences  would  affect  any  comparisons  of 
police  strength  between  two  or  more  departments. 

The  unreliability  of  comparisons  between  police  departments  based 
solely  on  the  number  of  reported  police  personnel  is  also  emphasized 
by  other  factors.  Probably  the  greatest  variation  in  the  number  of 
police  employees  as  between  cities  would  normally  be  expected  to 
result  from  wide  differences  in  the  hours  of  the  workweek.  A  correl- 
ative consideration  would  include  studies  of  the  amount  of  annual 
leave  or  vacation  granted.  Daily  or  seasonal  mfluxes  of  people  from 
urbanized  fringe  areas  to  an  industrial  center  or  because  of  entertain- 
ment or  vacation  attractions  would  bear  directly  on  a  comparison  of 
police  strength  between  cities.  These  are  not  all  of  the  differences 
which  may  affect  necessary  police  strength  but  they  are  sufficient  to 

268455°— 53 4 


24 

show  that  caution  should  be  used  in  approaching  comparisons  of  these 
data. 

In  processing  the  reports  part-time  employees  expressed  in  terms  of 
equivalent  full-time  employees  were  included  to  the  extent  of  the 
equivalent  number  of  full-time  personnel.  Wliere  a  basis  for  ratio 
was  not  reported  the  FBI  converted  the  hours  worked  by  part-time 
employees  on  the  assumption  that  a  regular  emploj^ee  worked  208 
hours  during  the  month.  If  a  part-time  employee  worked  at  least 
75  percent  of  the  normal  working  hours  for  the  month,  one  fuU-time 
employee  was  added. 

Over  340  letters  were  du-ected  to  contributors  concerning  adjust- 
ments, exclusion  of  employees  not  paid  from  funds  allocated  for 
police  department  personnel,  and  other  items  relating  to  the  uniformity 
of  the  data. 

Table  13.— NUMBER  OF  POLICE  DEPARTMENT  EMPLOYEES,  APR.  30, 
1953,  CITIES  OVER  25,000  IN  POPULATION 


City 


ALABAMA 

Anniston 

Bessemer 

B  irmingham 

Gadsen 

Mobile -- 

Montgomery 

Tuscaloosa 

ARIZONA 

Phoenix 

Tucson 

ARKANSAS 

Fort  Smith- 

Hot  Springs 

Little  Rock 

North  Little  Rock.. 
Pine  Bluff 

CALIFORNIA 

Alameda 

Alliambra 

Bakersfield 

Berkeley 

Beverly  Hills 

Burbank 

Compton. 

Fresno 

Glondale.  - 

Huntington  Park... 

Ingle  wood 

Long  Beach 

Los  Angeles 

Lynwood 

Oakland 

Palo  Alto 

Pasadena 

Pomona _ 

Rcdondo  Beach 

Redwood  City 

Richmond 

Riverside 


Number  of  police 

department  employees 

TOTAL 

Police 
oflBcers 

Civil- 
ians 

46 

45 

1 

34 

34 

423 

379 

44 

77 

76 

1 

166 

142 

24 

156 

143 

13 

54 

52 

2 

213 

180 

33 

79 

69 

10 

51 

49 

2 

38 

37 

1 

126 

117 

9 

61 

61 

36 

36 

73 

67 

6 

76 

66 

10 

102 

91 

11 

138 

132 

6 

76 

65 

11 

116 

88 

28 

61 

50 

11 

190 

169 

21 

162 

123 

39 

47 

46 

1 

61 

56 

5 

421 

327 

94 

5,139 

4,192 

947 

28 
789 
38 

27 
658 
36 

1 

131 

2 

193 

150 

43 

52 

46 

6 

30 

45 

29 
43 

1 
2 

143 

128 

15 

82 

77 

5 

City 


CALIFORNIA— Con. 


Sacramento 

San  Bernardino. 

San  Diego 

San  Francisco... 

San  Jose 

San  Leandro 

San  Mateo 

Santa  Ana 

Santa  Barbara.. 
Santa  Monica... 

South  Gate 

Stockton 

Vallejo 


COLORADO 


Colorado  Springs. 

Denver 

Pueblo 


CONNECTICUT 


Bridgeport 

Bristol 

East  Hartford.. 

Greenwich 

Hartford 

Meriden 

Middletown... 
New  Britain... 

Now  Haven 

New  London. .- 

Norwalk 

Norwich 

Stamford 

Stratford. 

Torrington 

Waterbury 

West  Hartford. 
West  Haven... 


TOTAL 


DELAWARE 
Wilmington 


Number  of  police 
department  employees 


263 

148 

481 

1,673 

136 

38 

53 

74 

78 

154 

51 

127 

79 


76 
632 

75 


360 
65 
56 

102 

306 
80 
43 

160 

427 
64 
86 
51 

175 
51 
58 

273 
76 
65 


246 


Police    Civil- 
officers    ians 


230 
116 
406 
1,576 
128 
34 
51 
70 
64 
121 
49 
114 
65 


68 
536 


348 
64 
48 
91 

262 
78 
40 

145 

398 
61 
82 
49 

165 
49 
57 

256 
71 
55 


216 


30 


25 

Table  13.— NUMBER  OF  POLICE  DEPARTMENT  EMPLOYEES,  APR.  30, 
1953,  CITIES  OVER  25,000  POPULATION— Continued 


City 


DISTRICT  OF  COLUMBIA 

Washington 

FLORIDA 

Daytona  Beach 

Fort  Lauderdale 

Gainesville 

Jacksonville 

Key  West 

Lakeland 

Miami  Beach 

Orlando 

Panama  City 

Pensacola 

St.  Petersburg 

Tallahassee 

Tampa 

West  Palm  Beach 

GEORGIA 

Albany 

Athens 

Atlanta 

Augusta 

Columbus 

La  Grange ._ 

Macon 

Rome 

Savannah 

IDAHO 

Boise 

Pocatello 

IILIWOIS 

Alton _ 

Aurora 

BellevUle 

Berwyn 

Bloomington 

Champaign 

Chicago 

Cicero 

Danville 

Decatur 

East  St.  Louis 

Elgin 

Evanston 

Galesburg 

Granite  City 

Joliet 

Kankakee 

Maywood 

Moline 

Oak  Park 

Peoria 

Qulncy 

Rock  Island 

Rockford 

Springfield 

Waukegan 

INDIANA 

Anderson ._ 

Bloomington 

East  Chicago 

Elkhart 

Evansville 

Fort  Wayne 

Gary 

Hammond 

Indlanapwlis 


Number  of  police 

department  employees 

TOTAL 

Police 
officers 

Civil- 
ians 

2,223 

2,065 

158 

67 

61 

6 

79 

69 

10 

44 

40 

4 

360 

306 

54 

26 

26 

35 

29 

6 

170 

128 

42 

97 

85 

12 

39 

32 

7 

79 

69 

10 

111 

97 

14 

52 

51 

1 

211 

187 

24 

75 

70 

5 

43 

42 

1 

43 

42 

1 

739 

643 

90 

165 

149 

16 

120 

120 

38 

37 

1 

109 

107 

2 

44 

38 

6 

176 

157 

19 

62 

53 

9 

38 

33 

5 

40 

40 

58 

55 

3 

32 

31 

1 

45 

45 

39 

35 

4 

34- 

34 

7,647 

7,035 

612 

106 

105 

1 

32 

32 

60 

47 

3 

97 

79 

18 

41 

40 

1 

128 

90 

38 

36 

32 

4 

22 

22 

71 

67 

4 

26 

25 

1 

24 

24 

32 

29 

3 

78 

74 

4 

147 

140 

7 

47 

43 

4 

44 

44 

104 

97 

7 

109 

93 

16 

42 

40 

2 

72 

67 

5 

39 

36 

3 

128 

122 

6 

58 

54 

4 

188 

171 

17 

198 

194 

4 

249 

202 

47 

140 

123 

17 

859 

745 

114 

INDIANA— Con. 

Kokomo 

LaFayette 

Marion 

Michigan  City 

Mishawaka 

Muncie 

New  Albany 

Richmond 

South  Bend 

Terre  Haute 

IOWA 

Burlington 

Cedar  Rapids 

Clinton 

Council  Bluffs 

Davenport 

Des  Moines 

Dubuque 

Fort  Dodge 

Iowa  City 

Mason  City 

Ottumwa 

Sioux  City 

Waterloo 

KANSAS 

Hutchinson 

Kansas  City 

Saliaa 

Topeka 

Wichita 

KENTUCKY 

Covington 

Lexington 

Louisville 

Newport 

Owensboro 

Paducah 

LOUISIANA 

Alexandria 

Baton  Rouge 

Lafayette 

Lake  Charles 

Monroe 

New  Orleans 

Shreveport 

MAINE 

Bangor... 

Lewiston 

Portland 

MARYLAND 

Baltimore 

Cumberland 

Hagerstown 

MASSACHUSETTS 

Arlington 

Belmont 

Beverly 

Boston 

Brockton 

Brookline 

Cambridge. 

Chelsea 


Number  of  police 
department  employees 


TOTAL 


67 
53 
43 
45 
47 

100 
32 
51 

183 
91 


33 


45 
92 
210 
48 
25 
22 
39 
32 
99 
72 


36 
165 

32 
121 
229 


83 
94 
516 
55 
52 
59 


61 
136 
40 
28 
55 
1,005 
140 


58 
54 
118 


2,553 
53 
55 


82 
50 
74 
3,052 
113 
136 
232 


Police 

Civil- 

officers 

ians 

57 

53 

43 

44 

1 

42 

5 

90 

10 

32 

51 

171 

12 

89 

2 

32 

1 

80 

8 

28 

40 

5 

85 

7 

189 

21 

47 

1 

25 

22 

32 

7 

31 

1 

78 

21 

71 

1 

33 

3 

143 

22 

30 

2 

93 

28 

189 

40 

79 

4 

88 

6 

470 

46 

48 

7 

50 

2 

59 

59 

2 

121 

15 

37 

3 

28 

45 

10 

1,005 

130 

io 

46 

12 

51 

3 

111 

7 

2,227 

326 

48 

5 

49 

6 

75 

7 

45 

5 

74 

2,826 

226 

108 

5 

131 

6 

224 
84 

8 
5 

26 

Table  13.— NUMBER  OF  POLICE  DEPARTMENT  EMPLOYEES,  APR  30, 
1953,  CITIES  OVER  25,000  IN  POPULATION— Continued 


City 


MASSACHUSETTS— Con. 

Chicopee 

Everett 

Fall  River 

Fitchburg 

Framingham 

Gloucester 

Haverhill 

Holyoke 

Lawrence 

Lowell - 

Maiden — 

Melrose 

New  Bedford. 

Northampton 

Pittsfleld 

Quincy..- 

Revere 

Salem 

SomervUIe 

Springfield 

Taunton 

Waltham 

Watertown _ 

Weymouth 

Worcester . 

MICHIGAN 

Ann  Arbor... 

Battle  Creek.- 

Bay  City 

Dearborn 

Detroit 

Femdale 

Flint -. 

Grand  Rapids 

Hamtramck 

Highland  Park 

Jackson 

Kalamazoo 

Lansing. _. 

Muskegon 

Pontiac. 

Port  Huron 

Royal  Oak_ 

Saginaw 

Wyandotte.- - 

MINNESOTA 

I5uluth 

Minneapolis 

Rochester 

St.  Cloud. 

St.  Paul 

Winona 

MISSISSIPPI 

Greenville 

Hattiesburg 

Jackson. -  - 

Laurel 

Meridian 

Vicksburg 

MISSOURI 

Columl)ia  

Independence 

Jefferson  City 

Joplin 

Kansas  City 

St.  Joseph 

St.  Louis 

Springfield 

University  City 


Number  of  police 

department  employees 

TOTAI 

Police 
officers 

Civil- 
ians 

81 

78 

3  'i 

119 

1)6 

3 

243 

222 

21  • 

77 

69 

8 

33 

33 

46 

44 

2 

66 

65 

1 

124 

123 

1 

145 

141 

4 

202 

190 

12 

121 

121 

60 

51 

9 

215 

203 

12 

37 

37 

81 

79 

2 

149 

143 

6 

80 

69 

11 

87 

80 

7 

160 

158 

2 

370 

3.50 

20 

65 

58 

7 

71 

66 

5 

74 

69 

5 

49 

47 

2 

384 

354 

30 

66 

60 

6 

54 

46 

8 

89 

74 

15 

197 

173 

24 

4,618 

4,235 

383 

43 

40 

3 

320 

243 

77 

263 

219 

44 

100 

96 

4 

121 

109 

12 

75 

70 

5 

111 

97 

14 

145 

141 

4 

75 

69 

6 

115 

99 

16 

50 

40 

10 

57 

50 

7 

141 

133 

8 

65 

56 

9 

145 

133 

12 

644 

582 

62 

42 

41 

1 

32 

31 

1 

374 

352 

22 

34 

34 

42 

38 

4 

28 

28 

164 

126 

38 

26 

26 

70 

61 

9 

33 

33 

34 

31 

3 

36 

35 

1 

29 

29 

40 

38 

2 

711 

565 

146 

105 

98 

7 

2,333 

1,892 

441 

98 

89 

9 

44 

43 

1 

City 


MONTANA 


Billings 

Butte 

Great  Falls. 


NEBRASKA 


Lincoln . 
Omaha.. 


NEVADA 


Reno- 


NEW  HAMPSHIRE 


Concord 

Manchester. 
Nashua.  _     . 


NEW  JERSEY 


Atlantic  City 

Bayonne 

Belleville 

Bloomfield 

Camden 

Clifton 

East  Orange 

Elizabeth..- 

Garfield 

Hackensack 

Hamilton 

Hoboken 

Irvington 

Jersey  City 

Kearney 

Linden 

Maple  wood 

Montclair 

New  Brunswick. 

Newark 

North  Bergen 

Nutley 

Orange 

Passaic 

Paterson 

Perth  .\mboy 

Plainfleld 

Teaneck 

Trenton 

Union  City 

Union. 

West  New  York. 
West  Orange 


NEW  MEXICO 


.A.lbuquerque- 

RoswelL 

Santa  Fe 


NEW  YORK 


Albany 

Amsterdam . . 

Auburn 

Bingham  ton. 

Buffalo 

Elmira 

Hempstead 
Irondequoit-- 

Ithaca 

Jamestown... 

Kingston 

Lackawanna. 
Lockport . .    - 


Number  of  police 
department  employees 


TOTAL 


109 
350 


86 


45 
126 
49 


211 

217 

61 

91 

285 

89 

142 

256 

41 

60 

61 

177 

110 

1,010 

113 

102 

49 

108 

72 

1,371 

106 

37 

95 

128 

266 

93 

84 

45 

259 

137 

77 

88 

65 


318 
42 
56 

126 
1,418 

100 
67 
25 
42 
61 
43 
65 
34 


27 

Table  13.— NUMBER  OF  POLICE  DEPARTMENT  EMPLOYEES,  APR.  30, 
1953,  CITIES  OVER  25,000  IN  POPULATION— Continued 


NEW  YORK— Con. 

Mount  Vernon 

New  Rochelle 

New  York 

Newburgh 

Niagara  Falls 

Poughkeepsie 

Rochester 

Rome 

Schenectady -- 

Syracuse -- 

Troy -- 

IJtica 

Watertown 

White  Plains 

Yonkers 

NORTH  CAROLINA 

Asheville 

Charlotte 

Durham 

Fayette  ville - 

Greensboro 

High  Point 

Kannapolis 

Raleigh 

Rocky  Mount 

Wilmington 

Winston-Salem 

NORTH  DAKOTA 

Fargo 

Grand  Forks.  _ -  -  - 

OHIO 

Akron 

Alliance 

Barberton 

Canton 

Cincinnati 

Cleveland 

Cleveland  Heights.  -. 

Columbus -- 

Cuyahoga  Falls 

Dayton 

East  Cleveland 

Elyria.-- _-_ 

Euclid 

Hamilton 

Lakewood 

Lima 

Lorain.  _ 

Mansfield 

Marion --. 

MassiUon 

Middletown 

Newark 

Norwood 

Parma 

Portsmouth 

Sandusky 

Shaker  Heights 

Springfield 

Steuben  vUle 

Toledo 

Warren 

Youngstown 

ZanesvOle 

OKLAHOMA 

Enid 

Lawton 

Muskogee -.. 

Norman 

Oklahoma  City ._ 

Tulsa 


Number  of  police 
department  employees 


161 

152 

20,052 

60 
170 

84 
548 

43 
172 
411 
193 
169 

48 
119 
271 


222 

120 
70 

145 
77 
23 

111 
49 
90 

173 


304 
30 
31 

148 

910 

2,120 

90 

557 
24 

326 
53 
39 
66 
75 
80 
53 
53 
46 
32 
27 
59 
36 
47 
31 
49 
33 
61 
88 
43 

466 
54 

290 
33 


39 
39 

47 

17 

350 

260 


147 

14 

137 

15 

9,147 

905 

60 

158 

12 

72 

12 

432 

116 

43 

161 

11 

332 

79 

152 

41 

159 

10 

45 

3 

113 

6 

240 

31 

79 

1 

192 

30 

100 

20 

64 

6 

125 

20 

.71 

6 

22 

1 

89 

22 

46 

3 

77 

13 

148 

25 

48 

9 

27 

2 

256 

48 

30 

27 

4 

143 

5 

876 

34 

1,786 

334 

65 

25 

461 

96 

23 

1 

287 

39 

45 

8 

36 

3 

55 

11 

73 

2 

63 

17 

49 

4 

53 

44 

2 

31 

1 

27 

56 

3 

35 

1 

44 

3 

29 

2 

48 

1 

32 

1 

60 

1 

80 

8 

43 

391 

75 

52 

2 

257 

33 

33 

38 

1 

36 

3 

44 

3 

17 

314 

36 

237 

23 

Number  of  police 
department  employees 


OREGON 

Eugene 

Portland 

Salem 

PENNSYLVANIA 

Abington 

Aliquippa 

Allentown 

Altoona 

Bethlehem 

Chester 

Easton 

Erie 

Harrisburg 

Haverford... 

Hazleton... 

Tohnstovm ^ 

Lancaster 

Lebanon 

Lower  Merion 

McKeesport 

Mount  Lebanon 

New  Castle 

New  Kensington 

Norristown 

Philadelphia 

Pittsburgh 

Reading 

Scranton 

Sharon 

Upper  Darby 

Washington -. 

Wtlkes-Barre 

Wilkinsburg 

Williamsport 

York 

RHODE  ISLAND 

Cranston 

East  Providence 

Newport 

Pawtucket 

Providence 

Warwick 

Woonsocket 

SOUTH  CAROLINA 

Charleston 

Columbia 

Greenville 

Spartanburg 

SOUTH  DAKOTA 

Rapid  City 

Sioux  Falls 

TENNESSEE 

Chattanooga 

Jackson 

Johnson  City 

Knoxville 

Memphis 

Nashville 

Oak  Ridge 

TEXAS 

Abilene 

Amarillo 

Austin 

Beaumont 

Brownsville 


49 

766 


34 

36 

125 

105 

79 

78 

46 

194 

136 

45 

30 

88 

77 

35 

110 

92 

40 

62 

31 

45 

,884 

,465 

178 

186 

34 

137 

32 

98 

43 

48 

81 


74 
71 
89 
162 
520 
62 


156 
142 
126 
75 


161 
35 
36 
183 
438 
330 
53 


69 
116 
186 
110 

63 


38 
665 
65 


34 

29 

117 

102 

72 

69 

44 

171 

124 

42 

30 

80 

73 

35 

99 

79 

38 

51 

31 

45 

4,182 

1,414 

131 

173 

33 

104 

30 

95 

28 

47 

80 


149 

441 

60 

94 


140 
129 
115 
69 


151 
35 
32 
153 
355 
276 
51 


65 
110 
153 
106 

42 


28 


Table  13.— NUMBER  OF  POLICE  DEPARTMENT  EMPLOYEES,  APR.  30, 
1953,  CITIES  OVER  25,000  IX  POPULATION— Continued 


City 


TEXAS— Continued 

Corpus  Christi 

Dallas 

El  Paso 

Fort  Worth 

Houston 

Laredo 

Lubbock 

Odessa-- 

Port  Arthur 

San  Angelo 

San  Antonio 

Temple -.- 

Tyler 

Waco 

Wichita  Falls 

UTAH 

Ogden_- 

Provo 

Salt  Lake  City 

VERMONT 

Burlington 

VIRGINIA 

Alexandria 

Arlington 

Charlottesville.  -  - -  - . 

Danville 

Hampton 

Lynchburg — 

Newport  News 

Norfolk 

Petersburg 

Portsmouth 

Richmond ..- _. 

Roanoke — 

WASHINGTON 

Bellingham — 

Bremerton 


Number  of  police 

department  employees 

TOTAL 

Police 
officers 

Civil- 
ians 

120 

106 

14 

571 

491 

80 

173 

141 

32 

421 

380 

41 

822 

615 

207 

52 

48 

4 

116 

99 

17 

60 

52 

8 

58 

56 

2 

55 

55 

395 

327 

68 

30 

29 

1 

40 

40 

102 

99 

3 

70 

63 

7 

63 

59 

4 

34 

27 

7 

249 

229 

20 

45 

42 

3 

103 

94 

9 

130 

113 

17 

41 

39 

2 

70 

69 

1 

60 

57 

3 

66 

63 

3 

71 

65 

6 

336 

298 

38 

49 

46 

3 

93 

86 

7 

343 

309 

34 

124 

119 

5 

44 

42 

2 

62 

45 

7 

City 


WASHINGTON— Con. 

Everett.- 

Seattle 

Spokane --. 

Taeoma 

Vancouver 

Yakima •-- 

WEST  VIRGINIA 

Charleston 

Clarksburg 

Fairmont-. 

Huntington 

Morgantown 

Parkersburg 

Wheeling 

WISCONSIN 

Appleton 

Beloit  

Eau  Claire 

Fond  du  Lae 

Green  Bay -.. 

Kenosha.' 

La  Crosse. 

Madison 

Manitowoc 

Milwaukee 

Oshkosh 

Racine 

Sheboygan 

Superior 

Wausau 

Wau  watosa 

West  Allis.- - 

WYOMING 
Cheyenne 

HAWAn 
Honolulu 


Number  of  police 
department  employees 


TOTAI 


51 

779 

224 

224 

52 

68 


108 
30 
29 

104 
20 
32 
80 


42 
46 
57 
39 
85 
81 
69 

161 

41 

1,558 

60 

125 
55 
58 
41 
52 
73 


48 


Police 
officers 


678 
198 
184 
52 
59 


42 
43 
49 
36 
80 
73 
63 

127 

39 

1,441 

60 

114 
55 
57 
41 
52 
71 


40 


Civil- 
ians 


3 
101 
26 
40 


34 

2 

117 


29 

Table  14.— NUMBER  OF  POLICE  DEPARTMENT  EMPLOYEES,  APR.  30, 
1953,  CITIES  WITH  POPULATION  FROM  2,500  TO  25,000 


City 


ALABAMA 

Albortville .. 

Alexander  City... 

Aliceville 

Andalusia. 

Athens.. 

Atmore... 

Attalla- 

Auburn 

Bay  Minette 

Boaz 

Brewton 

Primdidge 

Chickasaw 

Childersburg 

Clan  ton 

Cordova. 

Cullman 

Decatur. 

Dothan 

Elba 

Enterprise 

Evergrpcn 

Fairfield 

Fairhope 

Fayette 

Florala 

Florence.  

Fort  Payne 

Geneva 

Greenville 

Guntersville 

Hartselle 

Home  wood 

Jackson 

.Jacksonville 

Jasper 

Lanett 

Iveeds 

Lipscomb 

Marion 

Monroeville 

Mountain  Brook. 

Northport 

Oneonta.. 

Opelika 

Opp 

Phenix  City 

Piedmont 

Prattville 

Prichard 

Roanoke 

Selma 

Shawmut 

Sheffield 

Sylacauga 

Talladega... 

Tallassee 

Troy 

Tuscumbia 

Tuskegee 

Union  Springs .._ 
Wetumpka 

ARIZONA 

.\jo .  

Avondale 

Pisbee 

Casa  Grande 

Chandler 

Clifton 

Coolidge 

Douglas. 

Eloj 

Flagstafl 

Glen  dale 

Globe 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


City 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


ARIZONA— Con. 

Kingman 

Mesa 

Miami 

Nogales 

Prescott 

Tempe 

ToUeson 

Winslow 

Yuma 

ARKANSAS 

Arkadelphia 

Batesvillo 

Bentonville 

Bbtheville._ 

Brinkley 

Camden 

Clarendon 

Clarksville 

Conway 

Crossett 

De  Queen 

De  Witt 

El  Dorado 

Eudora 

Fayette  ville 

Fordyce 

Hamburg 

Harrison 

Helena 

Hope 

Jonesboro 

Magnolia 

Malvern 

Marianna 

Marked  Tree 

Mena 

Monticello 

Morrllton 

Nashville 

Newport 

Osceola 

Paris 

Piggott 

Pocahontas. 

Prescott 

Russellville 

Searcy 

Siloam  Springs 

Springdale 

Stamps 

Stuttgart 

Texarkana 

Trumann 

Van  Buren... 

Warren 

West  Helena 

Wynne 

CAUFORNIA 

Albany 

Alturas 

Anaheim 

Antioch 

Arcadia... 

Areata 

Atherton 

Atwater 

Auburn 

Azusa 

Baiming 

Barstow 

Beaumont 

Bell- 

Belmont 


City 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment em- 
ployees 


CAUFORNIA— Con. 

Benicia 

Bishop 

Blythe - 

Brawley 

Brea 

Burlingame 

Calexico 

Carmel  by  the  Sea... 

Chico 

Chino 

Chowcbilla 

Chula  Vista 

Claremont 

Clovis. 

Coachella 

Coalinga 

Colton 

Colusa 

Concord 

Corcoran 

Coming 

Corona 

Coronado 

Covina 

Culver  City 

Daly  City.... .- 

Davis 

Delano 

Dinuba 

El  Cajon 

El  Centro 

El  Cerrito 

El  Monte 

El  Segundo 

Emeryville 

Escondido 

Eureka 

Exeter 

Fairfax 

Fairfield 

Fillmore 

Fontana 

Fort  Bragg 

Fullerton 

Gardena 

Gilroy 

Glendora 

Grass  Valley 

Hanford 

Hawthorne 

Hay  ward 

Healdsburg 

Hemet 

Hermosa  Beach 

Hillsborough 

Hollister 

Huntington  Beach... 

Indio 

La  Habra 

La  Mesa 

La  Verne 

Laguna  Beach 

Larkspur 

Lindsay 

Livermore 

Lodi 

Lompoc 

Los  Banos 

Los  Gatos 

Madera 

Manhattan  Beach... 

Manteca... 

Martinez 

Marysville 

Maywood 

Menlo  Park 

Merced 


30 


Table  14.— NUMBER  OF  POLICE  DEPARTMENT  EMPLOYEES,  APR.  30, 
1953,  CITIES  WITH  POPULATION  FROM  2,500  TO  25,000— Con. 


City 


CALIFORNIA— Con. 


Mm  Valley.. _ _. 

Millbrae 

Modesto 

Monrovia 

Monte  hello 

Monterey 

Monterey  Park 

Mountain  View 

Napa... 

National  City 

Needles 

Nevada  City 

Newport  Beach 

North  Sacramento... 

Oakdale 

Oceanside 

Ojai 

Ontario 

Orange 

Oroville 

Oxnard 

Pacific  Orove 

Palm  Springs 

Paso  Robles 

Petaluma 

Piedmont -.. 

Pittsburg 

Placerville 

Port  Hueneme 

Porterville 

Red  Bluff 

Redding 

Redlands 

Reedley 

Rialto 

Riverbank 

Roseville 

Salinas 

San  Anselmo 

San  Bruno 

San  Carlos 

San  Fernando 

San  Gabriel 

San  Luis  Obispo 

San  Marino 

San  Pablo 

San  Rafael 

Sanger 

Santa  Clara 

Santa  Cruz 

Santa  Maria 

Santa  Paula.. _ 

Santa  Rosa 

Sausallto.. 

Seal  Beach 

Sebastopol 

Selma 

Sierra  Madre 

Signal  Hill 

South  Pasadena 

South  San  Francisco. 

Sunnyvale 

Susanville 

Taft - 

Torrance 

Tracy 

Tulare. 

Turlock. 

Ukiah 

Upland 

Vacavllle 

Ventura 

Vlsalia    

Wasco 

Watsonvlllc- 

Weed       


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


CALIFORNIA— Con. 


West  Covina. 

Whittier 

Willits 

Willows 

Woodlake 

Woodland 

Yreka  City... 
Yuba  Citv-.-- 


COLORADO 


Alamosa 

Aurora 

Boulder 

Brighton 

Canon  City 

Cortez -- 

Craig 

Delta 

Durango 

Englewood 

Florence 

Fort  Collins 

Fort  Morgan 

Golden 

Grand  Junction.. 

Greeley 

Gunnison 

La  Junta 

Lamar 

Leadville 

Littleton 

Longmont 

Loveland 

Manitou  Springs. 

Monte  Vista 

Montrose... 

Rocky  Ford 

Salida 

Sterling. 

Trinidad 

Walsenburg 


CONNECTICUT 


Ansonia 

Bethel... 

Branford 

Danbury 

Danielson 

Derby... 

Groton 

Jewctt  City 

Naugatuck 

Plymouth 

Putnam.. 

Rockville... 

Shelton 

Southlngton 

Stafford  Springs. 

Thomaston 

Thompson  ville.. 

Wallinpford- 

WiUimantic 

Winsted 


DELAWARE 


Dover. 

Elsmere 

Laurel 

Lewes 

Milford 

New  Castle. 

Newark  

Seaford 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


City 


FLORIDA 


Apalachicola 

Arcadia 

Aubumdale 

i  Avon  Park 

Bartow 

Belle  Glade 

Boynton  Beach 

Bradenton 

Chipley 

Clearwater. 

Cocoa. 

Coral  Gables 

Crestview 

Dade  City 

Dania 

De  Funiak  Springs.. 

De  Land 

Dunedin 

Eustis 

Fernandina. 

Fort  Meade. 

Fort  Myers 

Fort  Pierc* 

Green  Cove  Springs. 

Gulfport 

Haines  City 

Hallandale 

Hialeah 

Holly  Hill 

Hollywood 

Homestead 

Jacksonville  Beach.. 

Kissimmee 

Lake  City.. 

Lake  Wales 

Lake  Worth 

Leesburg 

Live  Oak 

Madison 

Marianna 

Melbourne 

Miami  Shores 

Miami  Springs 

Mount  Dora 

New  Smyrna  Beach. 

North  Miami 

Ocala 

Opalocka. 

Ormond. 

Palatka... 

Palm  Beach 

Palmetto 

Perry 

Pinellas  Park 

Plant  City 

Pompano  Beach 

Quincy 

Riviera  Beach 

St.  Augustine 

St.  Cloud 

Sanford 

Sarasota 

Sebring 

South  Miami 

Starke 

Stuart 

Titus  ville 

Vero  Beach 

Wauchula 

West  Miami.. 

Winter  Garden 

Winter  Haven 

Winter  Park 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment em 
ployees 


31 

Table  14.— NUMBER  OF  POLICE  DEPARTMENT  EMPLOYEES,  APR.  30, 
1953,  CITIES  WITH   POPULATION  FROM  2,500  TO  25,000— Con. 


City 


GEORGIA 


Adel 

Alma 

Americus 

Ashbum 

Bainbridge 

Barnes  ville 

Baxley 

Brunswick 

Buford 

Cairo 

Calhoun 

Camilla 

Canton 

CarroUton 

Carters  ville 

Cedartown 

Chamblee 

Cochran 

College  Park 

Commerce 

Cordele 

Covington 

Cuthbert _. 

Dawson 

Decatur 

Donalsonville.-- 

Douglas 

Dublin 

East  Point 

Eastman 

Eatonton 

Elberton 

Fitzgerald 

Forest  Park 

Forsyth 

Gainesville 

Greensboro 

GrifSn 

Hape  ville 

Hartwell 

Hawkins  ville 

Hazelhurst 

Hogans  ville 

Jesup 

Lafayette 

Lawrence  ville. - 

Manchester 

Marietta 

Milledge ville- -- 

MiUen 

Monroe 

Moultrie 

Newnan 

Ocilla 

Pelham 

Porterdale 

Quitman 

Rockmart 

Statesboro 

Summerville 

Swainsboro 

Sylvania 

Sylvester 

Tallapoosa 

Thomaston 

Thomas  ville 

Thomson 

Tifton 

Valdosta 

Vidalia 

Warner  Robins. 

Washington 

Waycross 

West  Point 

Winder. 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


City 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


IDAHO 

Alameda 

Blackfoot 

Buhl 

Burlev --_ 

Caldwell 

Coeur  d'Alene 

Emmett 

Gooding 

Idaho  Falls 

Jerome 

Kellogg 

Lewiston 

Malad  City 

Montpelier 

Moscow 

Nampa.-. 

Payette 

Preston 

Rexburg.. __ 

Rupert 

St.  .\nthony 

Salmon 

Sandpoint 

Twin  Falls 

Wallace 

Weiser 

IIIINOIS 

Aledo 

Anna 

Arlington  Heights 

Barrington 

Batavia 

Beardstown 

Bellwood 

Belvidere 

Blue  Island 

Bradley 

Brookfleld 

Bushnell 

Cairo 

Calumet  City 

Canton 

Carbondale 

Carlin  ville 

Carlyle 

Carmi 

Carthage 

Casey 

Centralia 

Charleston 

Chicago  Heights  - 

Chillicothe 

Christopher 

Clinton 

Colllnsville 

Creve  Coeur 

Crystal  Lake 

De  Kalb 

Des  Plaines 

Dolton 

Downers  Grove.-. 

Du  Quoin 

Dwight 

East  Alton 

East  Moline 

East  Peoria 

Edwardsville 

Effingham 

Eldorado 

Elmhurst--- 

Elmwood  Park, .. 
Evergreen  Park- . 
Fairfield 


City 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment em- 
ployees 


ILLINOIS— Con. 


Farmington 

Flora 

Forest  Park 

Franklin  Park 

Freeport 

Fulton _. 

Galena 

Geneseo 

Geneva 

Georgetown 

Gibson  City 

Gillespie 

Glen  Ellyn 

Gleneoe 

Glenview 

Greenville 

Harrisburg 

Harvard 

Harvey 

Havana 

Herrin 

Highland 

Highland  Park.. 

Highwood 

Hillsboro 

Hinsdale 

Homewood 

Hoopeston 

Jacksonville 

Jersey  ville 

Johnston  City... 

Kenilworth 

Kewanee 

La  Grange 

La  Grange  Park. 

La  Salle 

Lake  Forest 

Lansing 

Lawrenceville 

Lemont 

Lewistown 

Libertyville 

Lincoln,.   .  

Lincolnwood 

Litchfield 

Lockport 

Lombard 

Loves  Park 

Lyons 

Macomb 

Madison 

Marengo 

Marion 

Markham 

Marseilles 

Marshall 

Mascoutah 

Mattoon 

McLeansboro 

Melrose  Park 

Mendota 

Metropolis 

Midlothian 

Momence 

Monmouth 

Monticello 

Morris 

Morrison 

Morton 

Morton  Grove. _. 
Mount  CarmeL . 
Mount  Prospect 
Mount  Vernon.. 

Mundelein 

Murphysboro 

Naperville 


268453°— 53 5 


32 

Table  14.— NUMBER  OF  POLICE  DEPARTMENT  EMPLOYEES,  APR.  30, 
1953,   CITIES  WITH   POPULATION   FROM  2,500  TO  25,000— Con. 


City 


ILLINOIS— Continued 


Newton 

Niles 

Nokomis 

Normal 

North  Chicago 

North  Lalfe 

North  Riverside  -  _ 

Northbrook 

Oak  Lawn 

Oglesby 

Olney 

Oregon 

Ottawa. 

Palatine 

Pana 

Park  Forest 

Park  Ridge 

Paxton 

Pekin 

Peoria  Heights 

Peru 

Pinekney  ville 

Pittsfield 

Pontiae 

Princeton 

Rantoul 

River  Forest 

River  Grove 

Riverdale 

Riverside 

Robinson 

RochcUe 

Rock  Falls 

Rockdale  Junction. 

Rush  ville 

St.  Charles 

Salem 

Sandwich 

Savanna 

Shelby  ville 

Silvis 

Skokie 

South  Beloit.. 

South  Holland 

Sparta.- 

Spring  Valley 

Staunton 

Steger 

Sterling 

Stickney 

Streator 

Sullivan 

Summit 

Sycamore 

Taylorville 

Urbana 

Vandalia 

Venice.. -- 

Villa  Park..- 

Virden 

Washington 

Waterloo. . 

Watseka 

Westchester  

West  Chicago 

Western  Springs... 

Westmont... 

Westville. 

Wheaton  

White  Hall 

Wilmette 

Wilmington 

Winnetka 

Wood  River.. 

Woodstock 

Zeigler.. 

Zion... 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


City 


Number 

of  police 

dei)art- 

meiit 

employees 


INDIANA 

Alexandria 

Angola. 

Attica 

Auburn 

Aurora 

Batesville 

Bedford 

Beech  Grove 

Bicknell 

Bluffton 

Boonville 

Brazil 

Bremen 

Brookville 

Cambridge  City... 

Charlestown 

Chesterton 

Clarksville 

Clinton 

Columbia  City 

Columbus 

Connersville 

Crawfordsville 

Crown  Point 

Danville 

Decatur 

Delphi 

Dunkirk 

East  Gary 

Edinburg 

Elwood 

Fairmount 

Frankfort 

Franklin 

Garrett 

Gas  City 

Goshen 

Greencastle 

Greenfield 

Greensburg 

Greenwood 

Griffith 

Hartford  City 

Highland 

Hobart 

Huntingburg 

Huntington 

Jasonville 

Jasper 

Jefferson  ville 

Kendall  ville 

La  Porte 

Lawrence  burg 

Lebanon 

Linton.-  

Logansport 

Madison 

Martinsville 

Mitchell 

Monticello 

Mount  Vernon 

Munster 

Nappanec 

New  Castle 

Noblesville -- 

North  Manchester 

North  Vernon 

Oakland  City 

Paoli 

Peru 

Petersburg 

Plainfleld 

Plymouth 

Portland 

Princeton... 

Rensselaer 

Rochester 


City 


INDIANA— Con. 

Rush  ville 

Salem 

Scottsburg. 

Seymour 

Shelby  ville... 

Speedway 

Sullivan 

Tell  City. 

Tipton 

Union  City 

Valparaiso 

Vincennes 

Wabash 

Warsaw 

Washington 

West  Lafayette 

West  Terre  Haute  . 

Whiting 

Winchester 

IOWA 

Albia.. 

Algona 

Ames 

Anamosa ..- 

Atlantic 

Audubon 

Belle  Plaine 

Bettcnilorf 

Bloomfield 

Boone 

Carroll.. 

Cedar  Falls. 

Centerville 

Chariton 

Charles  City 

Cherokee 

Clarinda.. 

Clarion.. 

Clear  Lake 

Creston 

De  Witt.. 

Decorah.. 

Denison 

Eagle  Grove 

Eldora.. 

Emmetsburg 

Estherville.. 

Fairfield  

Forest  City 

Fort  Madison 

Glenwood 

Grirmell 

Hampton 

Harlan 

Hawarden 

Humboldt 

Indoi)endence 

Indianola 

Iowa  Falls 

Jefferson 

Keokuk 

Knoxville 

Le  Mars 

Manchester 

Maquoketa 

Marion 

Marshalltown 

Missouri  Valley 

Monticello 

Mount  Pleasant... 

Muscatine 

Nevada 

New  Hampton 

Newton.. 

Oelwein 


Number 
of  police 
depart-  ' 
ment  em- 
ployees 


33 

Table  14.— NUMBER  OF  POLICE  DEPARTMENT  EMPLOYEES,  APR.  30, 
1953,   CITIES  WITH  POPULATION  FROM  2,500  TO  25,000— Con. 


City 


IOWA— Continued 

Onawa 

Osage 

Osceola ._ 

Oskaloosa 

Pella... .-_ 

Perry. 

Red  Oak 

Rock  Rapids 

Sac  City 

Sheldon 

Shenandoah 

Sibley 

Spencer 

Storm  Lake 

Tama 

Tipton_ 

Vinton 

Washington 

Waukon _. 

Waverly 

Webster  City 

West  Des  Moines 

Winterset 

KANSAS 

Abilene 

Anthony 

Arkansas  City 

Atchison 

Augusta 

Baxter  Springs 

Belleville. 

Beloit 

Caney 

Chanute 

Cherry  vale.- .-. 

Clay  Center 

Coffevville 

Colby 

Columbus 

Concordia 

Council  Grove 

Dodge  City 

El  Dorado 

Ellinwood 

Ellis. 

Emporia.- 

Eureka 

Fort  Scott 

Fredonia 

Garden  City 

Garnett 

Goodland 

Great  Bend 

Hays 

Herington 

Hiawatha 

Hoisington 

Helton 

Hugoton 

Independence 

lola 

Junction  City 

Kingman 

Lamed 

LawTence 

Leavenworth 

Liberal 

Lyons 

Manhattan 

Marysville 

McPherson 

Neodesha 

Newton 

Norton 

Olathe 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


City 


KANSAS— Continued 

Osawatomie 

Ottawa 

Paola 

Parsons 

Phillipsburg 

Pittsburg 

Pratt 

Russell 

Scott  City 

Wellington 

Winfleld 

KENTUCKY 

Bardstown 

Belle  vue 

Berea 

Bowling  Green 

Carrollton 

Catlettsburg 

Central  City 

Corbin 

Cumberland 

Cynthiana 

Danville.. 

Dayton 

Elizabethto  wn 

Elsmere 

Erlanger 

Fort  Thomas 

Frankfort 

Franklin 

Fulton... 

Georgetown 

Glasgow 

Greenville 

Harlan 

Harrodsburg 

Hazard 

Henderson 

Hopkins  villa 

Jenkins 

Lebanon 

London... 

Ludlow 

Mayfield 

Maysville 

Middlesboro 

Monticello 

Morehead 

Morganfield 

Mount  Sterling 

Paintsville 

Paris 

Park  Hills 

Pikeville 

Pineville 

Prestonsburg 

Princeton 

Providence 

Richmond 

Russell  ville 

Shelby  ville 

Somerset 

South  Fort  Mitchell.. 

Versailles 

Winchester 

LOUISIANA 

Abbeville 

Amite 

Bastrop 

Berwick 

Bogalusa 

Bossier  City 

Bunkie 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


City 

Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment em- 
ployees 

LOUISIANA-Con. 
Church  Point- - 

4 

De  Quincy 

3 

De  Ridder.. 

5 

Donaldsonville 

Ferriday 

6 
3 

Franklin .. 

g 

Hammond-. 

11 

Harahan  -  ...    

2 

HaNTiesville 

3 

Homer 

Houma 

5 
17 

Jackson 

1 
3 

Jennings  . 

7 

Jonesboro 

Kaplan 

4 
4 

10 

Leesville 

11 

Mansfield 

5 

Minden...  .           

10 

Morgan  City       .. 

11 

Natchitoches..     .     -. 

12 

New  Iberia 

20 

4 

Opelousas 

15 

Pineville.. 

5 

Plaquemine.   . 

g 

4 

Port  Allen ... 

3 

Ravne 

10 

10 

St.  Martinville 

SlidelL.     

3 
4 

Springhill 

5 

Tallulah 

7 

10 

Ville  Platte.. 

g 

Vinton 

4 

West  Monroe 

14 

Winnfield 

6 

4 

MAms 

Auburn 

25 

Augusta..     

25 

Bar  Harbor..    

4 

Bath 

13 

Belfast 

6 

Biddeford 

14 

Brewer.. 

7 

Brunswick 

Calais.. 

12 
6 

Camden 

Caribou  . 

4 

s 

Dexter 

2 

Dover  Fo.xcroft 

Eastport 

2 
2 

Ellsworth 

5 

Fairfield 

3 

Farmington 

8 

Gardiner 

7 

Hallowell 

Houlton 

4 
9 

Kennebunk  

4 

Kittery 

9 

Lincoln      .  .. 

3 

Livermore  Falls 

Madawaska 

1 
3 

Madison 

1 

Millinocket  ... 

5 

Norway 

2 

Old  Orchard  Beach... 
Old  Town 

7 
7 

Orono.  

4 

Pittsfield 

3 

Presque  Isle 

9 

34 


Table  14.— NUMBER  OF  POLICE  DEPARTMENT  EMPLOYEES,  APR. 
1953,   CITIES  WITH   POPULATION  FROM  2,500  TO  25,000— Con. 


30, 


City 


MAINE— Continued 


Rockland 

Rumford - 

Saco 

Sanford 

Skowhegan 

South  Portland - 

Waterville 

Westbrook 

Winslow 


MARYLAND 


Annapolis 

Bel  Air 

Bladensburg 

Brentwood 

Brunswick 

Cambridge 

Capitol  Heights. 

Cheverly 

Crisfleld. 

Easton 

Elkton 

Frederick 

Frostburg 

Oreenbelt 

Havre  de  Grace. 

Hyattsville 

Laurel 

Mount  Rainier. . 
Poeomoke  City.. 

Riverdale 

Salisbury 

Takoma  Park 

Westcrnport 


MASSACHUSETTS 


Abington 

Adams 

Amesbury 

Amhurst 

Andover 

AthoL 

Attleboro 

Auburn__ -- 

Ayer 

Barnstable 

Blackstone 

Braintree_ 

Bridgewater - 

Canton 

Clinton 

Concord.. 

Dalton 

Danvers 

Dartmouth 

Dedham.-- 

Dracut 

Easthampton 

Fairhaven ^- 

Falmouth.. 

Foxborough 

Franklin - 

Gardner 

Great  Barrington. 

Greenfield 

Hingham... 

Hudson. 

Ipswich 

Lee 

Leominster 

Lexington 

Ludlow  ._ 

Marblehead 

Marlboro 

Maynard... 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


City 


MASSACHUSETTS- 

Continiud 

Methuen 

Middleborough 

Milford .-- 

Millbury 

Milton 

Montague 

Nantucket 

Natick 

Necdhani 

Newburyport 

North  Adams 

North  Andover 

North  Attleboro 

North  Brookfleld.. 

Northbridge 

Norwood 

Orange 

Palmer 

Peabody... --. 

Plymouth 

Province  town 

Randolph 

Reading 

Rockland 

Rockport 

Saugus 

Sharon_.. 

Somerset 

South  Hadley 

Southbridge 

Spencer 

Stoneham 

Stoughton 

S  wampscott 

Wakefield 

Walpole. 

Ware 

Webster 

Wellesley 

West  Springfield 

Westborough 

Westfield 

Whitman 

Williamstown 

Winchendon 

Winchester 

Winthrop 

Woburn 

MICHIGAN 

Adrian 

Albion.. 

Algouae 

Allegan 

Allen  Park 

Alma 

Alpena 

Bad  Axe 

Belding 

Benton  Harbor 

Berkley 

Bessemer 

Big  Rapids. 

Birmingham 

Boyne  City 

Buchanan 

Cadillac 

Caro 

Center  I^ine   

Charlevoix 

Charlotte 

Cheboygan 

Chelsea.... 

Clawson -.. 

Coldwater 

Dowagiac 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


City 


mCHIGAN-Con. 

Durand 

East  Detroit 

East  Grand  Rapids.. 

East  Lansing 

Eaton  Rapids 

Ecorse 

Escanaba 

Esscxville 

Fenton 

Fremont 

Garden  City 

Gladstone 

Grand  Haven. 

Grand  Ledge 

Greenville . . 

Grosse  Pointe     

Qrosse  Pointe  Farms 
Grosse  Pointe  Park.. 
Grosse  Pointe  Woods 

Hancock 

Hastings 

Hazel  Park 

Hillsdale 

Holland 

Houghton - . 

Howell 

Hudson 

Huntington  Woods.  - 

Inkster 

Ionia 

Iron  Moimtain 

Iron  River 

Ironwood 

Ishpeming 

Ktngsford 

Lapeer 

Laurium 

Livonia 

Ludington 

Manistee 

Manisti<4ue 

Marine  City. 

Marquette  _ 

Marshall 

Marysville 

Mason 

MelvLndale 

Menonmiee 

Midland 

Milan 

Monroe 

Mount  Clemens 

Mount  Morris 

Mount  Pleasant 

Munising 

Muskegon  Heights... 

Negaunee 

Newberry 

Niles 

Northville 

Norway 

Otsego 

Owosso 

Petoskev 

Plain  well 

Pleasant  Ridge 

Plymouth 

River  Rouge 

Rochester 

Rogers  City 

Romeo. 

Roseville - 

St.  Clair 

St.  Clair  Shores 

St.  Ignace — 

St.  Johns 

St.  Joseph 


Number 
of  police 
dejiart-' 
ment  em- 
ployees 


I 


35 

Table  14.— NUMBER  OF  POLICE  DEPARTMENT  EMPLOYEES,  APR.  30, 
1953,  CITIES  WITH  POPULATION  FROM  2,500  TO  25,000— Con. 


City 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


MICHIGAN— Cod. 


St.  Louis 

Sault  Ste  Marie- 
South  Haven 

Sturgis 

Tecumseh 

Three  Rivers 

Traverse  City... 

Trenton 

Vassar 

Wakefield 

Wayne 

Ypsilanti 

Zeeland 


MINNESOTA 


Albert  Lea 

Alexandria 

Anoka 

Austin 

Bayport 

Beniidji 

Benson 

Blue  Earth 

Brainerd. 

Breckenridge 

Brooklyn  Center 

Chisholm. 

Cloquet 

Columbia  Heights.. 

Crookston 

Crystal 

Detroit  Lakes 

East  Grand  Forks. . 

Edina 

Ely 

Eveleth ___..... 

Fairmont 

Faribault 

Fergus  Falls 

Fridlcy 

Glencoe 

Glenwood 

Golden  Valley 

Grand  Rapids 

Granite  Falls 

Hastings 

Hibbing 

Hopkins 

Hutchinson 

International  Falls. 

Lake  City 

Le  Sueur 

Litchfield 

Little  Falls 

Luverne 

Mankato 

Marshall 

Montevideo 

Moorhead 

Morris 

New  Ulm 

North  Mankato. -- 

North  St.  Paul 

Northfleld 

Ortonville 

Owatorma 

Park  Rapids 

Pipestone 

Proctor 

Red  Wing 

Redwood  Falls 

Richfield 

Robbinsdale 

St.  James 

St.  Louis  Park 

St.  Peter 


City 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


MINNESOTA— Con. 


Sauk  Centre 

Sauk  Rapids. 

Shakopee 

Sleepy  Eye 

South  St.  Paul-.-. 

Springfield 

Staples..- 

Stillwater 

Thief  River  Falls. 

Tracy 

Two  Harbors 

Virginia 

Wadena 

Waseca 

West  St.  Paul 

White  Bear  Lake. 

Willmar 

Windom 

Worthington 


MISSISSIPPI 


Aberdeen 

Amory 

Bay  St.  Louis.. 

Booneville 

Clarksdale 

Cleveland 

Columbia 

Corinth 

Ellisville 

Forest 

Greenwood 

Grenada 

Hazlehurst 

Indianola 

Kosciusko 

Leland 

Lexington 

Louisville 

McComb 

Moss  Point 

Natchez 

Newton 

Ocean  Springs- 
Oxford 

Pascagoula 

Philadelphia... 
Port  Gibson... 

Tupelo 

Waynesboro. -- 

West  Point 

Winona 

Yazoo  City 


MISSOURI 


Aurora 

Berkeley 

Bethany 

Boonville 

Brentwood 

Brookfleld 

Butler 

California 

Cameron 

Cape  Girardeau. 

Carrollton 

Carthage 

Caruthersville... 

Chaflee 

Charleston 

Chillicothe 

Clayton 

Clinton 

Crystal  City 

Dexter.-- 


City 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment em- 
ployees 


MISSOURI— Con. 


Eldon 

Eldorado  Springs 

Excelsior  Springs 

Farmington 

Fayette 

Ferguson 

Festus 

Florissant 

Fredericktown 

Fulton---- 

Glendale 

Hannibal-  - - 

Harrisonville 

Hayti 

Higginsville 

Jackson 

Jennings. 

Kennett 

Kinloch 

Kirksville 

Kirkwood 

Ladue 

Lamar 

Lebanon 

Lees  Summit 

Liberty 

Louisiana 

Macon 

Maiden 

Maplewood 

Marceline 

Marshall 

Maryville 

Mexico 

Moberly 

Monett 

Nevada 

New  Madrid 

North  Kansas  City- 

O  verland 

Pagedale 

Poplar  Bluff 

Portage  ville. 

Richmond.. 

Richmond  Heights.. 

Rock  Hill 

Rolla 

St.  Ann.... 

St.  Charles 

Salem 

Sedalia 

Shrewsbury -- 

Slater 

SuUivan 

Trenton 

Valley  Park 

Vandalia 

Warrensburg 

Washington 

Webb  City 

Webster  Groves 

Wellston 

West  Plains 


MONTANA 


Anaconda.-. 

Bozeman 

Cut  Bank.. 
Deer  Lodge. 

DUlon 

Glasgow 

Glendive 

Hamilton... 

Havre 

Helena 

Kalispell 


36 

Table  14.— NUMBER  OF  POLICE  DEPARTMENT  EMPLOYEES,  APR.  30, 
1953,  CITIES  WITH  POPULATION  FROM  2,500  TO  25,000— Con. 


City 


MONTANA— Con. 

Laurel 

Lowistown __ 

Livingston _ 

Miles  City 

Missoula. 

Roundup 

Shelby—. 

Sidney 

Whitefish 

Wolf  Point ._ 

NEBRASKA 

Alliance 

Auburn 

Beatrice 

Bellevue 

Blair - 

Broken  Bow 

Chadron 

Columbus 

Cozad 

Crete.... 

Fairbury 

Falls  City 

Gering 

Gothenburg 

Grand  Island 

Hastings... 

Holdrege 

Kearney _ 

Lexington 

McCook 

Nebraska  City 

Norfolk 

North  Platte 

O'Neill 

Ogallala 

Plattsmouth 

Schuyler 

Scottsblufl 

Seward 

Sidney 

South"  Sioux  City 

Superior 

Valentine 

Wahoo 

West  Point 

York 

NEVADA 

Boulder  City 

Carson  City 

Elko.. 

Fly 

Las  Vegas 

North  Las  Vegas 

Sparks 

Winnemucca 

NEW  HAMPSHIRE 

Berlin 

Claremont- 

Dcrry 

Dover 

Durham 

ExcUt... 

Franklin 

Hanover 

Keene 

Laconia 

Lebanon 

Littleton 

Milford 

Newport 


Number 
of  pohce 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


City 


NEW     HAMPSHIRE— 

Continued 

Portsmouth 

Rochester 

Somerworth 

NEW  JERSEY 

Asbury  Park 

Atlantic  Highlands 

Audubon 

Barrington 

Belmar 

Bergenfield 

Beverly 

Bogota 

Boonton 

Borden  town 

Bound  Brook 

Bradley  Beach 

Bridgeton 

Burlington 

Butler 

Caldwell 

Carlstadt 

Carteret 

Chatham 

Clayton 

Clemen  ton 

CHfiside  Park 

Closter 

Collings  wood 

Cranford 

Cresskill 

Dover 

Dumont 

Dunellen 

East  Paterson 

East  Rutherford... 

Eatontown 

Edgewater 

Englewood 

Fair  Haven 

Fair  Lawn 

Fairview 

Fanwood 

Flemington 

Florence 

Fort  Lee 

Franklin 

Freehold 

Garwood- 

Gibbstown 

Glassboro... 

Glen  Ridge 

Glen  Rock 

Gloucester  City 

Guttenberg... 

Hackettstown 

Haddon  Heights... 

Haddonfield.. 

Hammonton 

Harrison 

Hasbrouck  Heights 

Hawthorne 

Highland  Park.   .. 

Highlands 

Hightstown 

Hillsdale 

Hillside 

Keansburg 

Kenilworth 

Keyport 

Lakcwood 

Lambert  ville 

Leonia 

Linden  wold. 

Little  Ferry 

Little  Silver 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


City 


NEW  JERSEY— Con. 

Lodi 

Long  Branch 

Lyndhurst 

Madison.. 

Manasquan 

Manville 

Margate  City 

Matawan 

Maywood 

Merchantville 

Metuchen 

Middlesex 

Midland  Park 

Millburn 

Milltovm 

Millville 

Morris  Plains 

M  orristown 

Mount  Ephraim 

Neptune 

New  M  ilford 

New  Providence 

Newton 

North  Arlington 

North  Haledon 

North  Plainfleld 

Northfield. 

Oaklyn 

Ocean  City... 

Ocenn  Grove 

Oceanport 

Oradell 

Palisades  Park 

Palmyra 

Paramus ^ 

Park  Ridge 

Pan  Isboro 

Penns  Grove 

Pennsauken 

Phillipsburg 

Pitman 

Pleasantville 

Point  Pleasant 

Point  Pleasant  Beach 

Pompton  Lakes 

Princeton 

Prospect  Park 

Rahway 

Ramsey 

Raritan 

Red  Bank 

Ridgefield 

Ridgefield  Park 

Ridgewood 

River  Edge 

Riverside 

Riverton.. 

Roselle 

Roselle  Park 

Rumson 

Runnemede 

Rutherford 

Salem 

Sayre  ville 

Secaucus 

Somerville 

South  Aniboy 

South  Bound  Brook.. 

South  Orange      

South  PlainHeld 

South  River 

Sununit.. 

Tenaflv 

Toms  River 

Totowa 

Union  Beach 

Ventnor  City... 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment em- 
ployees 


■   37 

Table  14.— NUMBER  OF  POLICE  DEPARTMENT  EMPLOYEES,  APR.  30, 
1953,  CITIES  WITH  POPULATION  FROM  2,500  TO  25,000— Con. 


City 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


NEW  JERSEY— Con. 

Verona 

Vineland 

Waldwick 

Wallington 

Washington 

Weehawken 

West  Caldwell 

West  Long  Branch  _  _ 

West  Paterson 

Westfield 

Westville 

Westwood 

Wharton 

Wildwood 

Williamstown 

Wood  Ridge 

Woodbury 

Wood-Lynne 

NEW  MEXICO 

Alamogordo 

Artesia 

Belen 

Carlsbad 

Clayton 

Clovis 

Deming 

Farmington 

Gallup 

Hobbs 

Las  Vegas  City 

Las  Vegas  Towti 

Lordsburg 

Los  Alamos 

Portales 

Raton 

SOver  City 

Socorro 

Tucumcari 

NEW  YORK 

Albion 

Amityville 

Attica 

Babylon 

Baldwinsville 

Ballston  Spa 

Batavia 

Bath 

Beacon 

Blasdell 

Brockport 

Bronxville 

Canajoharie 

Canandai  gua 

Canastota 

Canisteo 

Canton 

Carthage 

CalskOl 

Cobleskill 

echoes 

Cooperstown 

Corinth 

Corning 

Cortland 

Coxsackie 

Croton-on-Hudson 

Dansville 

Depew 

Dobbs  Ferry 

Dolgeville _ 

Dunkirk - 

East  Aurora 

East  Rochester 


City 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


NEW  YORK— Con. 

East  Syracuse 

Ellen  vDle 

Elmira  Heights 

Elmsford 

Endicott 

Falconer 

Fa  vette  vUle 

Floral  Park 

Fort  Edward 

Fort  Plain 

Frankfort 

Fredonia 

Freeport 

Fulton 

Garden  City 

Geneseo 

Geneva 

Glen  Cove 

Glens  Falls 

Gloversville 

Goshen 

Gouverneur 

Gowanda 

Granville 

Green  Island 

Greenport 

Hamburg 

Hamilton 

Hastings  on  Hudson. 

Haverstraw 

Herkimer 

Highland 

Highland  Falls 

Homer 

Hoosick  Falls 

Hornell 

Horseheads 

Hudson 

Hudson  Falls.- 

Huntington 

Dion 

Irvington 

Islip 

Johnson  City 

Johnstown 

Kenmore 

Lake  Placid 

Lakewood 

Lancaster 

Larchmont 

Le  Roy 

Liberty 

Lindenhurst 

Little  Falls 

Liverpool 

Long  Beach 

Low  ville 

Lynbrook 

Lyons 

Malone 

Malverne 

Mamaroneck 

Massena 

Mechanicville 

Medina..- 

M  iddletown 

Mohawk 

Monticello 

Mount  Kisco 

Mount  Morris.- 

New  York  Mills 

Newark 

North  Pelham 

North  Syracuse 

North  Tarrytown 

North  Tonawanda... 
Northport 


City 


NEW  YORK- Con. 

Norwich 

Nyack 

Ogdensburg 

Olean 

Oneida 

Oneonta 

Ossining 

Oswego 

Owego 

Palmyra 

Patchogue 

PeekskUl 

Pelham  Manor 

Penn  Yan 

Plattsburg 

Plcasantville 

Port  Chester .-. 

Port  Jervis 

Potsdam 

Rensselaer 

Riverhead 

RockviUe  Centre 

Rye 

Salamanca 

Saranac  Lake 

Saratoga  Springs 

Saugerties 

Scarsdale 

Scotia 

Seneca  Falls 

Silver  Creek 

Sloan 

Solvay 

South  Glens  Falls... 

South  Nyack... 

Southampton 

Spring  Valley 

Sprmg  vUle 

SufEern 

Tarrytown 

Ticonderoga 

Tonawanda 

Tuckahoe 

Tupper  Lake 

Walden 

Wappingers  Falls 

Warsaw 

Warwick 

Waterford 

Waterloo -. 

Water  vliet 

Watklns  Glen 

Wellsville 

Westfleld 

Whitehall 

Whitesboro 

Yorkville 

NORTH  CAROLINA 

Ahoskie 

Albermarle 

Asheboro 

Beaufort 

Belmont 

Bessemer  City 

Boone 

Brevard 

Burlington 

Canton 

Chapel  Hill 

Concord 

Cramerton 

Draper 

Dunn— - -- 

Edenton 

Elizabeth  City 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment em- 
ployees 


38 

Table  14.— NUMBER  OF  POLICE  DEPARTMENT  EMPLOYEES,  APR.  30, 
1953,  CITIES  WITH  POPULATION  FROM  2,500  TO  25,000— Con. 


City 


NORTH  CAROLINA 

Continued 

Elkin._ _ 

Farmville_ 

Forest  City 

Qastonia 

Qoldsboro 

Graham- 

Greenville 

Hamlet 

Henderson 

Henderson  ville 

Hickory 

Jacksonville 

Kings  Mountain 

Kinston. 

Laurinburg. 

Leaksville 

Lenoir 

Lexington 

Lincointon 

Loulsburg 

Lumberton 

Marion 

Monroe 

Mooresvllle. -.. 

Morehead  City 

Morganton 

Mount  Airy.. 

Mount  Olive 

Newton .  - 

North  Wilkesboro. . 

Oxford 

Plymouth 

Reidsville 

Roanoke  Rapids 

Rockingham . .  _ 

Roxboro 

Rutherford  ton 

Salisbury 

Sanford 

Scotland  Neck 

Selma 

Shelhv 

Siler  Citv-.- 

Smithfield 

Southern  Pines 

Spindale... 

Statesville 

Tarboro--. 

Thomasville 

Valdese... 

Wadesboro--. 

Wake  Forest 

Washington 

Wavnesville 

Whiteville 

Williamston 

WUson 

NORTH  DAKOTA 

Bismarck 

Devils  Lake 

Dickinson 

Grafton 

Jamestown 

Mandan 

Minot 

Rugby 

Valley  City 

Wahpeton 

Willlston 

OHIO 

Ada 

Amherst 

Ashland 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


City 


OHIO— Continued 

Ashtabula _ 

Athens 

Avon 

Avon  Lake 

Barnesville _.. 

Bay 

Bedford... 

Bellaire 

Bellefontaine 

Bellevue.. 

Berea 

Bexley... 

Bowling  Green 

Brecksville 

Bridgeport 

Brook  Park 

Brooklyn 

Bryan 

Bucyrus 

Cadiz 

Cambridge 

Campbell 

Carey 

CarroUton 

Celina 

Chagrin  Falls 

Cheviot 

Chillicothe 

Circleville 

Clyde.- 

Columbiana 

Coshocton 

Crestline 

Deer  Park 

Defiance 

Delaware 

Deimison 

Dover 

East  Liverpool 

East  Palestine 

Eastlake 

Eaton.' 

Elmwood  Place 

Fairborn 

Fairport  Harbor 

Fairview  Park 

Flndlay 

Fostoria 

Franklin 

Fremont 

Gallipolis 

Garfield  Heights 

Geneva 

Girard 

Golf  Manor 

Grand  view  Heights.. 

Granville 

Greenfield  _ 

Greenhills 

Greenville 

Hicksville 

nillsboro 

Hubbard 

Huron.- 

Iron ton 

Jackson... 

Kent 

Kenton... 

Lancaster 

Lebanon .. 

Leetonia 

Lincoln  Heights 

I/isbon 

Lockland. 

Logan       . . 

Louisville 

Lyndhur.st 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


City 


OHIO— Contmued 

Madnira 

Maple  Heights 

Mafiemont.   ...  

Marietta 

Martins  Ferry 

Marysville .  ... 

Maumee.-  

Mayfield  Heights 

Medina ..-. 

Miamisburg 

Middleport .. 

Minerva .  . 

Mingo  Junction 

Montpelier 

Mount  Vernon 

Napoleon 

Nelsonville    

New  Boston 

New  Philadelphia... 
Newburgh  Heights.. 
Newcomersto wn . . . . . 

Newton  Falls.. 

Niles ..  .. 

North  Baltimore 

North  Canton 

North  College  Hill... 

North  Olmsted 

North  Royalton 

Norwalk..  

Oakwood 

Oberlin 

Orrville 

Ottawa 

Oxford 

Painesville 

Parma  Heights  . . 
Perrysburg. ...... 

Piqua 

Pomeroy 

Port  Clinton... 

Ravenna .. 

Reading . 

Rittman..  .  

Rocky  River . 

Rossford..  .  .  

St.  Bernard 

St.  Clairsville 

St.  Marys 

Salem 

Sebring . 

Shadvside 

Shelby 

Sidney 

Solon 

South  Euclid 

Strongsville 

Struthers  

Tallraadge 

Tiffin .. 

Tipp  City 

Toronto.- 

Troy 

Uhrichsville . 

University  Heights. . 
Upper  Arlington..  .- 

Upper  Sandusky 

Urbana... 

Van  Wert. 

Wadsworth. 

Waiiakoneta 

Warrciisville  Heights 

Washington  C.  H 

Wauseon 

Wellington 

Wellston 

Wellsville 

West  CarroUton 


Number 
of  police' 
depart- 
ment em- 
ployees 


39 

Table  14.— NUMBER  OF  POLICE  DEPARTMENT  EMPLOYEES,  APR.  30, 
1953,  CITIES  WITH  POPULATION  FROM  2,500  TO  25,000— Con. 


City 


OHIO— Continued 

Westerville 

Westlake 

Whitehall 

Wickhffe 

Willard 

Willoughby 

Willowick 

Wilmington 

Windham 

Wooster 

Wyoming 

Xenia 

OKLAHOMA 

Ada 

Altus 

Alva 

Anadarko 

Antlers 

Ardmore 

Atoka 

Bartlesville 

Bethany 

Blaekwell 

Broken  Arrow 

Chandler 

Checotah 

Cherokee 

Chickasha 

Claremore.-- 

Clinton 

Cordell 

Cashing 

Dewey _ 

Drumright _ 

Duncan 

Durant 

Edmond 

El  Reno 

Elk  City 

Eufaula 

Frederick , 

Guthrie 

Guymon 

Healdton 

Henryetta 

Hobart 

Holden  ville 

Hollis 

Hominy 

Hugo_ 

Kingfisher 

Konawa 

Lindsay 

Madill 

Mangum _ , 

Marlow 

McAlester.- 

Miami 

Midwest  City 

Nichols  Hills 

Nowata 

Okmulgee 

Pawhuska 

Pawnee 

Perry 

Ponea  City 

Pryor  Creek 

Sallisaw 

Sapulpa 

Sayre 

Seminole 

Shawnee 

Stillwater 

Sulphur.- 

Tahlequah 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


City 


OKLAHOMA— Con. 

Tonkawa 

Vinita 

Walters 

Watonga 

Wewoka 

Woodward 

OREGON 

Albany 

Ashland_ ._ 

Astoria 

Baker 

Beaverton.._  

Bend 

Bums 

Coos  Bay 

Coquille 

Corvallis 

Dallas 

Forest  Grove 

Grants  Pass 

Gresham 

Hermiston 

Hillsboro 

Hood  River 

Klamath  Falls 

La  Grande 

Lebanon 

McMinn  ville 

Medford 

Milwaukie 

Newberg 

Newport _ 

North  Bend,. 

Nyssa 

Ontario 

Oregon  City 

Oswego 

Pendleton 

Prine  vOle. 

Redmond. 

Roseburg 

St.  Helens 

Silverton... 

Springfield--. 

Sweet  Home 

The  Dalles- -.- 

Tillamook 

West  Linn 

PENNSYLVANIA 

Aldan 

Ambler 

Ambridge 

Ann  ville 

Apollo 

Archbald 

Arnold 

Ashland.- - 

Ashley 

Aspinwall 

Athens 

Avalon 

Baden 

Bangor 

Barnesboro-  - - 

Beaver 

Beaver  Falls... 

Bedford. 

Bellefonte 

Bellevue 

Bellwood 

Bentley  ville 

Berwick 

Bethel - 

BlairsvUle 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


City 


PENNSYLVANIA- 

Continued 

Blakely 

Bloomsburg 

Boyertown 

Brackenridge 

Braddock 

Brentwood  _ 

Bridgeport.. 

Bridgeville.- ., 

Bristol 

Brockway 

Brookville 

BrownsvOle 

Bumham 

Butler 

California 

Camp  Hill 

Canonsburg 

C  arbondale . .  

Carlisle 

Carnegie... 

Castle  Shannon 

C  atasauqua 

Chambersburg 

Cheltenham 

Clarion 

C  larks  Summit 

Clearfield 

Clifton  Heights 

Clymer... 

Coaldale 

Coatesville 

Collingdale 

Connellsville 

C  onshohocken 

Coplay --- 

Coraopolis-- 

Corry 

Crafton 

Cresson 

Curwensville 

Dale 

Danville 

Darby 

Derry 

Dickson  City 

Donora 

Dormont 

Downingtown 

Doyiestown 

Dravosburg 

Du  Bois 

Dunmore 

Dupont 

Duquesne 

Duryea 

East  Conemaugh 

East  Lansdowne 

East  Mauch  Chunk 
East  McKeesport... 

East  Pittsburgh 

East  Stroudsburg--- 

Ebensburg 

Eddystone 

Edgewood.  

E  d  wards  ville 

Elizabeth 

Elizabethtown 

Ellwood  City 

Emmaus 

Emporium 

Emsworth 

Ephrata 

Etna... 

Exeter 

FarrelL 

Ford  City 


Number 
of  police- 
depart- 
ment em- 
ployees 


40 


Table  14.— NUMBER  OF  POLICE  DEPARTMENT  EMPLOYEES,  APR.  30, 
1953,  CITIES  WITH  POPULATION  FROM  2,500  TO  25,000— Con. 


City 


PENN.— Con. 


Forest  City 

Forest  Hills 

Forty  Fort 

Fountain  Hill 

Franklin 

Freedom 

Freeland 

Freeport 

Galiitzin 

Gettysburg 

Girardville 

Glassport 

Glenolden 

Greencastle 

Greensburg 

Greenville 

Grove  City 

Hanover 

Hanover  Twp... 

Hatboro 

Hellertown 

Hollidaysburg.-- 

Homestead 

Honesdale. 

Hummelstown... 

Huntingdon 

Indiana — 

Ingram..- 

Irwin 

Jeannette 

Jenkintown 

Jermyn 

Jersey  Shore 

Johnsonburg 

Kane 

Kenhorst 

Kennett  Square - 

Kingston. .- 

Kittanning 

Kulpmont 

Kutztown 

Lansdale 

Lansdo  wne 

Lansford 

Larks  ville 

Latrobe 

Laureldale 

Leechburg 

Lehigh  ton 

Lemoyne 

Lewisburg 

Lewistown 

Lititz 

Littlestown 

Lock  Haven 

Luzerne- 

Lykens 

Mahanoy  City.- . 

Manheim- -. 

Mansfield 

Marcus  Hook 

Masontown.-    . . 
Mauch  Chunk... 

McAdoo 

McDonald 

McKees  Rocks- . 
McSherrystown. 

Mead  ville 

Mechanicsburg- 

Media 

Meyersdale 

Middletown 

Midland 

MlUersburg 

Millvale 

Milton 

MlnorsviUe 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


6 
5 

14 
4 
3 
2 
2 
8 
2 
9 
4 
2 

25 
8 
6 

11 

21 
7 
8 
4 

31 
5 
1 
6 

15 
4 
4 

15 

12 
1 
3 
4 
4 
2 
5 

18 
9 
4 
3 

12 

17 
5 
8 

13 
2 
2 
5 
4 
4 

16 
3 
1 

15 
5 
2 
6 
2 
2 
8 
3 
2 
3 
2 
16 
1 
21 
5 
10 
2 
6 
13 
3 
16 
7 
4 


City 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


PENN.— Con. 


Monaca 

Monps,sen 

Monongahela 

Montoursville 

Moosic 

Morrisvillf.  _. 

Mount  Carmel 

Mount  Joy 

Mount  Oliver 

Mount  Pcnn 

M  ount  Pleasant 

Mount  Union 

Muncy 

Munhall 

Myerstown 

Nanticoke 

Nanty  Glo 

Narberth 

Nazareth 

New  Cumberland . . . 

New  Holland 

North  Belle  Vernon. 

North  Braddock 

North  Catasauqua... 

North  East 

North  Wal"s 

Northam  pton 

Northumberland 

Oakmont 

Oil  Citv 

Old  Forge.... 

Olyphant - 

Oxford... 

Palmerton 

Palmyra 

Parkesburg 

Patton 

Pen  Argyl 

Penbrook.. 

Philipsburg 

Phoenix  ville 

Piteairn 

Pittston.. 

Plains 

Plymouth 

Port  Allegany 

Port  Carbon 

Port  Vue 

Portage 

Pottstown - . 

Pottsville 

Prospect  Park 

Punxsuta  wney 

Quakerto  wn 

Rankin 

Red  Lion 

Renovo... 

Reynolds  ville 

Ridgway 

Roaring  Spring 

Royersford.. — 

St.  Clair 

St.  Marys 

Schuylkill  Haven 

Scottdale 

Se  wick  ley 

Shaler 

Shamokin 

Sharon  Hill 

Rharpsburg 

Sharpsville 

Shenandoah 

ShilUnpton 

Shippensburg 

Slatting  ton 

Somerset. 

Soiiderton 


2 
10 
8 
7 
4 
1 

22 
2 
14 
2 
5 
8 
4 
1 
2 
21 
2 
3 
2 
10 
2 
7 

27 

2 

6 

5 

5 

4 

1 

2 

3 

1 

5 

14 

6 

24 

6 

19 

1 

1 

2 

2 

26 

27 

4 

13 

6 

13 

4 

2 

3 

4 

2 

3 

5 

4 

6 

6 

14 

13 

15 

6 

12 
4 

12 
4 
4 
3 
8 
3 


City 


Number 
of  police' 
depart- 
ment em- 
ployees 


PENN.— Con. 

South  Connellsville. 

South  Fork 

South  Greensburg-. 
South  Williamsport- 

Spangler... 

Spring  City... 

Springdale 

State  College 

Stroudsbure 

Summit  Hill 

Sunbury. 

Susquehanna 

Swarthmore 

Swissvale. 

Swoyerville 

Tamaqua 

Tarentum 

Taylor 

Throop 

Titusville 

Towanda 

TrafTord 

Trevorton 

Turtle  Creek 

Tyrone 

Union  City 

Uniontown 

Vandergrift 

Verona 

Warren 

Waynesboro 

Waynesburg 

Weatherly 

Wellsboro . 

Wesley  ville 

West  Chester 

West  Hazleton 

West  Homestead 

West  Mifflin 

West  Newton 

West  Pittston 

West  Reading 

West  View.  

West  Wyoming 

West  York 

Westmont... 

Whitehall 

Wilmerding 

Wilson 

Windber.. 

Winton. 

Wyoming 

Wyomissing 

Yeadon 

Youngwood 


RHODE  ISLAND 


Barrineton — 

Bristol... 

Burrillville 

Central  Falls 

Cumberland- 

East  Greenwich 

Johnston 

Lincoln 

North  Providence 

Warren. 

West  Warwick 

Westerly 


SOUTH  CAROLINA 


Abbeville. 

Aiken 

Anderson. 
Andrews.. 


41 

Table  14.— NUMBER  OF  POLICE  DEPARTMENT  EMPLOYEES,  APR.  30, 
1953,  CITIES  WITH  POPULATION  FROM  2,500  TO  25,000— Con. 


City 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


SOUTH  CAROLINA- 

Continued 

Bamberg .r. 

Batesburg 

Beaufort 

Bolton 

Bcnnettsville 

Bishopville 

Camden 

Cheraw 

Chester 

Clinton 

Clover 

Conway 

Darlington 

Denmark 

Easley 

Florence 

Fort  Mill 

Gaffney 

Georgetown 

Great  Falls 

Greenwood 

Greer 

Honea  Path 

Kingstree 

Lake  City 

Lancaster 

Laurens 

Manning 

Marion 

McColl 

MullLns  

Myrtle  Beach_. 

Newberry 

Orangeburg 

Rock  Hill 

Seneca 

Summerville 

Sumter 

Union 

Walhalla 

Williamston 

York 

SOUTH  DAKOTA 

Aberdeen 

Belle  Fourche 

Brookings 

Canton 

Deadwood 

Hot  Springs 

Huron 

Lead 

Lemmon 

Madison 

Mitchell -■ 

Mobridge 

Pierre 

Redfield 

Sisseton 

Spearfish 

Sturgis 

Vermillion 

Watertown. 

Webster 

Winner 

TENNESSEE 

Alcoa 

Belle  Meade 

Bristol.,- 

Brownsville 

Clarksv  ille 

Cleveland 

Clinton 

Columbia 


City 


TENNESSEE— Con. 

Cookeville 

Covington 

Dayton 

Dickson 

Dyersburg 

Elizabeth  ton 

Etowah 

Fayetteville 

Franklin 

Gallatin 

Greeneville 

Harriman 

Henderson 

Humboldt 

JefTerson  C  ity 

Kingsport 

Lawrenceburg 

Lebanon 

Lenoir  City 

Lewisburg 

Lexington 

Loudon -. 

Maryville 

McKenzie 

McMiimville 

Milan 

Morristown 

Mount  Pleasant 

M  urfreesboro 

Newport 

Paris 

Pulaski- 

Ripley 

Rockwood-- --. 

Rogersville 

Shelby  ville 

South  Pittsburg 

Sparta 

Sweetwater 

Tullahoma 

Union  City 

Winchester-  - 

TEXAS 

Alamo 

Alamo  Heights 

Alice 

Alvin -_- 

Andrews — --- 

Aransas  Pass 

Arlington 

Athens 

Atlanta 

Ballinger 

Bastrop 

Bay  City.- 

Baytown 

Beeville 

Belton 

Benavides 

Big  Spring 

Bonham.- 

Borger 

Bowie  - 

Brady 

Breckenridge 

Brownfleld 

Brown  wood 

Bryan--- _. 

Burkburnett _. 

Canadian 

Canyon 

Carrizo  Springs 

Carthage .. 

Center 

Childress 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


City 


TEXAS— Continued 

Cisco 

Clarendon 

Cleburne -. 

Cleveland 

Coleman--. 

College  Station 

Colorado  City 

Columbus 

Comanche 

Commerce 

Conroe 

Corsicana 

Crockett 

Crystal  City 

Cuero 

Dalhart 

Decatur - 

Del  Rio - 

Denison 

Denton 

Dublin 

Dumas  

Eagle  Lake 

Eastland 

Edinburg 

Edna 

El  Campo .  -. 

Electra--- - 

Elgin — -. 

Falfurrias 

Fort  Stockton  

Fredericksburg 

Freeport-.  

Gainesville 

Galena  Park 

Garland 

Gatesville 

Georgetown . . 

Giddings 

Gilmer 

Glade  water 

Gonzales _ 

Graham 

Grand  Prairie 

Greenville 

Hamlin 

Harlingen 

Haskell 

Hearne 

Henderson 

Henrietta 

Hereford--  

Highland  Park 

Hondo 

Hunts  ville 

Irving 

Jacksboro 

Jacksonville-- . 

Jasper 

Kaufman 

Kenedy 

Kermit 

Kilgore--- 

Killeen..  

King.sville 

Lake  Jackson 

Lampasas 

Lancaster 

Levelland 

Liberty 

Littlefield 

Livingston.- ._. 

Llano 

Longview 

Lufkin 

Luling 

Marfa 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment em- 
ployees 


42 


Table  14.— NUMBER  OF  POLICE  DEPARTMENT  EMPLOYEES,  APR.  30, 
1953,  CITIES  WITH  POPULATION  FROM  2,500  TO  25,000— Con. 


City 


TEXAS— Continued 

Maiiin ._ 

Marshall-- -- 

MrAllen 

McCamey 

McKinney 

Memphis 

Mercedes  -- 

Mexia 

Midland 

Mineola 

Mineral  Wells - 

Mission 

Monahans 

Mount  Pleasant 

Nacogdoches 

Navasota 

Nederland 

New  Boston 

New  Braunfels 

Nocona 

Olney 

Orange 

Palacios -- 

Palestine 

Pampa.- 

Paris 

Pasadena 

Pearsall 

Pecos 

Perryton 

Pharr 

Plainview 

Port  Lavaca 

Premont 

Quanah 

Ranger 

Raymond  ville 

Robstown 

Rosenberg 

Rotan 

Rusk 

San  Augustine 

San  Benito 

San  Juan 

San  Marcos 

Seminole 

Seymour 

Shamrock 

Sherman 

Slaton 

Smithville 

Snyder 

South  Houston 

Stamford 

Stephen  ville 

Sulphur  Springs 

Sweetwater 

Tahoka 

Taylor - 

Teague 

Terrell 

Texarkana 

Tulla.. 

I'nlversity  Park 

Uvalde 

Vernon 

Victoria 

Waxahachle- 

Weatherford-- 

Weslaco 

W.  University  Place.. 

Winnsboro 

Yoakum 

Yorktown 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


City 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


UTAH 

American  Fork. . . 
Bingham  Canyon 

Bountiful. -. 

Brigham 

Cedar  City 

Clearfield 

Heber 

Helper 

Layton 

Lehi -. 

Logan 

Midvale 

Murray 

Nephi 

Orem - 

Payson 

Pleasant  Orove.. 

Price 

Richfield 

Roy 

St.  George 

South  Ogden 

South  Salt  Lake. 

Spanish  Fork 

Spring  ville 

Tooele 

Vernal 

VERMONT 

Barre 

Bellows  Falls 

Bennington 

Brattleboro 

Essex  Junction... 

Middlebury 

Montpelier 

Newport 

Rutland 

St.  Albans 

St.  Johnsbury 

Springfield 

Waterbury 

Windsor --. 

Winooski 

VIRGINIA 

Abingdon 

AltaVista. -.. 

Appalachia 

Bassetts 

Bedford 

Big  Stone  Gap 

Blacksburg 

Blackstone 

Bristol 

Buena  Vista 

Chase  City 

Chincoteague 

Christiansburg.- 

Clifton  Forge 

Colonial  Heights. 

Covington 

Culpeper 

Emporia 

Falls  Church 

Farmville 

Franklin 

Fredericksburg. . 

Front  Royal 

Galax 

Harrisonburg 


City 


VIRGINIA— Con. 

Hopewell 

Lexington. .-. 

Luray 

Marion 

M  artins  ville 

Norton 

Orange 

Pulaski 

Radford.. 

Richlands 

Salem 

SaltvUle 

South  Boston 

South  Norfolk 

Staunton 

Suffolk 

Vinton 

Virginia  Beach 

Waynesboro 

W  illiamsburg 

Winchester 

WASHINGTON 

Aberdeen - 

Anacortes 

Auburn 

Buckley 

Camas 

Centralia 

Chehalis 

Cheney 

Clarkston 

Colfax 

Colville 

Dayton.. 

EUensburg... 

Enumclaw 

Ephrata..- 

Grand  Coulee 

Grand  view. 

Hoquiam 

Kelso 

Kennewick 

Kent 

Kirkland. 

Longview  — 

Medical  Lake 

Moses  Lake 

Mount  Vernon 

Navy  Y^ard,  Bremer 

ton. 

Olympia... 

Omak 

Pasco 

Port  Angeles... 

Port  Townsend 

Prosser 

Pullman 

Puyallup--. 

Raymond 

Renton 

Richland 

Sedro  Woolley 

Shelton. 

Snohomish 

Sumner 

Sunnyslde 

Toppenish 

Tumwater 

Walla  Walla 

Wapato 

Wenatchee 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment em- 
ployees 


43 


Table  14  —NUMBER  OF  POLICE  DEPARTMENT  EMPLOYEES,  APR.  30, 
1953,  CITIES  WITH  POPULATION  FROM  2,500  TO  25,000— Con. 


City 


WEST  VIRGINIA 


Beckley 

Benwood 

Bluefleld 

Buckhannon 

Charles  Town 

Chesapeake. 

Chester 

Dunbar 

Elkins 

Follansbee 

Grafton 

Hinton 

Kenova 

Keyser 

Keystone 

Logan 

Mannington 

Marmet 

Martinsburg-.-  -_, 

McMechen 

MoundsvUle 

Mullens 

New  Martlnsvllle- 

Nitro... - 

Oak  Hill 

Paden  City 

Phillppi 

Piedmont 

Point  Pleasant — 

Princeton 

Rich  wood 

South  Charleston- 
Vienna 

War 

•Weirton 

Wellsburg 

SVeston 

*.Vestover 

AVilliamson 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


WISCONSIN 


Algoma 

,  Antigo 

Ashland 

Baraboo 

Beaver  Dam 

Berlin 

Black  River  Falls. 
Bloomer 


City 


WISCONSIN— Con. 


Burlington 

Cedarburg 

Chippewa  Falls 

Clinton  ville 

Columbus 

Cudahy 

De  Pere 

Delavan 

Dodgeville 

Edgerton 

Elkhom 

Evansville 

Fort  Atkinson 

Fo.x  Point 

Greendale 

Hartford 

Horieon 

Hudson 

Hurley 

Janesville 

Jefferson 

Kaukauna 

Kewaunee 

Kimberly 

Ladysmith 

Lake  Geneva 

Lake  Mills 

Lancaster 

Little  Chute 

^farinette 

Marshfield 

Mauston 

Mayville 

Medford 

Menasha 

Menomonie 

Merrill 

Monona 

Monroe 

Neenah 

Neillsville 

New  Richmond. -- 

Oconomowoc 

Oconto 

Park  Falls 

Platte  ville 

Plymouth 

Port  Washington - 

Portage 

Prairie  Du  Chien. 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment 
employees 


City 


WISCONSIN— Con. 


Reedsburg 

Rhinelander 

Rice  Lake 

Richland  Center. _. 

Ripon 

River  Falls 

Sha,wano 

Sheboygan  Falls. . . 

Shorewood 

South  Milwaukee.. 

Sparta 

Spooner 

Stevens  Point 

Stoughton 

Sturgeon  Bay 

Tomah 

Tomahawk 

Two  Rivers 

Viroqua 

Watertovm 

Waukesha 

Waupaca 

Waupun 

West  Bend 

West  Milwaukee. - 

Whitefish  Bay 

Whitewater 

Wisconsin  Rapids. 


Number 
of  police 
depart- 
ment em- 
ployees 


WYOMING 

Buflalo 

Casper 

Cody 

Douglas 

Evanston 

Green  River 

Lander 

Laramie 

Lovell 

Newcastle -- 

Powell 

Rawlins 

Riverton 

Rock  Springs 

Sheridan 

Thermopolis 

Torrington 

Worland 


6 

14 

7 

7 

6 

3 

7 

3 

24 

19 

8 

4 

20 

6 

9 

6 

4 

15 
6 
16 
33 
5 
6 
7 

16 
28 


4 
27 
5 
3 
4 
4 
4 
16 
4 
3 
4 
10 
6 
10 
12 
3 
6 
6 


OFFENSES  CLEARED  AND  PERSONS  ARRESTED 

Offenses  Cleared  by  Arrest,  1952 

Police  cleared  by  arrest  1  out  of  4  reported  crimes  in  1952.  In 
some  categories  the  proportion  cleared  was  high,  9  out  of  10  homicides 
for  example,  but  the  clearance  rate  for  all  offenses  as  a  group  is  held 
down  by  the  large  number  of  larcenies.  Only  1  out  of  5  larcenies 
was  cleared  and  more  larcenies  are  reported  than  all  the  other  Part  I 
offenses  combined.  Excluding  larcenies,  the  police  cleared  1  out  of 
2.9  of  the  remaining  more  serious  crimes. 

The  clearance  rate  for  crimes  against  the  person  is  noticeably 
higher  than  for  crimes  against  property.  This  is  not  altogether 
attributable  to  the  fact  that  the  offender  is  usually  observed  by  the 
victim,  for  the  highest  percentage  of  crimes  cleared  is  for  murder  and 
in  these  cases  the  best  witness  is  deceased.  The  concentration  of 
police  effort  on  these  more  vicious  crimes  is  an  important  contributing 
factor  to  the  success  reflected  in  clearances  ranging  from  75.0  percent 
for  aggravated  assaults  to  93.1  percent  for  murders.  Over  78  percent 
of  the  rape  offenses  and  87.5  percent  of  the  negligent  manslaughters 
were  cleared  by  arrest.  The  negligent  manslaughters  to  a  large  extent 
represent  traffic  victims. 

Crimes  against  property  were  cleared  at  the  rate  of  23  per  100 
offenses  with  18  persons  being  arrested  and  charged.  Thirty-six 
percent  of  the  robberies  were  cleared.  Almost  27  percent  of  the 
burglaries  and  nearly  26  percent  of  the  auto  thefts  were  cleared  in 
1952.    Larceny  clearances  were  less  than  20  percent. 

Police  departments  in  1,706  cities,  representing  a  combined  popu- 
lation of  61.6  million,  reported  275,273  clearances  by  arrest  out  of 
the  1,053,984  known  Part  I  offenses.  These  clearances  resulted  from 
the  arrest  and  charging  of  217,191  persons. 

Generally,  an  offense  is  cleared  by  arrest  when  at  least  one  of  the 
perpetrators  of  the  crime  is  identified  with  the  crime  and  is  arrested 
and  charged  although  there  are  certain  technical  exceptions.  The 
number  of  persons  charged  does  not  indicate  the  number  of  offenses 
cleared  since  the  latter  term  pertains  to  offenses  known  as  distin- 
guished from  individuals  arrested.  In  addition,  several  persons  may 
be  arrested  and  charged  with  the  commission  of  only  one  crime, 
such  as  a  gang  arrested  in  a  warehouse  burglary.  Also,  the  arrest  of 
a  lone  bandit  and  his  identification  with  5  armed  robberies  would 
clear  5  offenses. 

(44) 


45 


61,592,916  POPULATION 

Kl  CHARTI 

Figure  3. 


46 


Table  15.— OFFENSES  KNOWN,  CLEARED  BY  ARREST,  AND  PERSONS 
CHARGED  (HELD  FOR  PROSECUTION),  1952,  BY  POPULATION 
GROUPS,  NUMBER  PER  100  KNOWN  OFFENSES 

[Population  figures  from  1950  decennial  census] 


Population  group 


TOTAL,  GROUPS  I-VI 

1,706  cities;  total  population,  61,592- 
916: 

Offenses  known 

Offenses  cleared  by  arrest 

Persons  charged 

GROUP  I 

31  cities  over  250,000;  total  popula- 
tion, 27,861,794: 

Offenses  known 

Offenses  cleared  by  arrest 

Persons  charged. 

GROUP  11 

51  cities,  100,000  to  250,000;  total  popu- 
lation, 7,361,057: 

Offenses  known 

OffeJises  cleared  by  arrest 

Persons  charged 

GROUP  III 

97  cities,  50,000  to  100,000;  total  popu- 
lation, 6,859,727: 

Offenses  known 

Offenses  cleared  by  arrest 

Persons  charged... 

ORG  UP  IV 

194  cities,  25,000  to  50,000;  total  popu- 
lation, 6,810,619: 

Offenses  known 

Offenses  cleared  by  arrest 

Persons  charged. 

GROUP  V 

523  cities,  10,000  to  25,000;  total  popu- 
lation, 8,086,433: 

Offenses  known.. 

Offenses  cleared  by  arrest 

Persons  charged 

GROUP  VI 

810  cities  under  10,000;  total  popula- 
tion, 4,613,286: 

Offenses  known 

Offenses  cleared  by  arrest 

Persons  charged. 


Criminal  homi- 

cide 

Mur- 

der, 

Man- 

nonneg- 

slaugh- 

ligent 

ter  by 

man- 

negli- 

slaugh- 

gence 

ter 

100.0 
93.1 
93.8 


100.0 
92.6 
92.9 


100.0 
93.7 


100.0 
94.3 
100.0 


100.0 
95.8 
102.5 


100. 0 
92.3 
90.1 


100.0 
92.3 
80.0 


100.0 
87.5 


100.0 
85.1 
87.1 


100. 0 
91.9 
86.5 


100.0 
87.1 
74.3 


100.0 
86.9 
82.6 


100.0 
96.4 
106.6 


100.0 
89.4 
95.3 


Rape 


100.0 
78.2 
75.4 


100.0 
76.8 
71.7 


100.0 

78.2 
75.5 


100.0 
76.3 
72.5 


100.0 
84.9 
86.0 


100.0 
82.2 
92.1 


100.0 
85.4 
91.6 


Rob- 
bery 


100.0 
36.0 
36.2 


100.0 
34.3 
32.9 


100.0 
39.9 

42.7 


100.0 
38.4 
43.3 


100.0 
43.7 
51.1 


100.0 
44.1 
52.9 


100.0 
47.4 
51.8 


Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


100.0 
75.0 
61.7 


100.0 
71.1 
52.5 


100.0 
72.1 
57.6 


100.0 
85.5 
82.9 


100.0 
85.9 
87.1 


100.0 
90.6 
94.4 


100.0 
85.5 


Bur- 
glary— 
break- 
ing or 
enter- 
ing 


100.0 
26.7 
19.4 


100.0 
23.9 
16.5 


100.0 
28.8 
18.5 


100.0 
27.7 
19.2 


100.0 
32.1 
26.5 


100.0 
29.7 
24.0 


100.0 
36.6 
33.9 


Lar- 
ceny- 
theft 


100.0 
19.8 
15.0 


100.0 
19.5 

14.7 


100.0 
20.9 
13.9 


100.0 
18.1 
14.8 


100.0 
19.6 
15.6 


100.  0 
19.2 
14.6 


100.0 
25.9 
20.1 


The  above  table  shows  by  city  groups,  the  number  of  offenses 
cleared  and  the  number  of  persons  charged  for  each  100  offenses 
known,  as  reported  by  police  in  1,706  cities.  The  actual  figures 
reported  as  to  offenses  and  clearances,  arranged  by  geographic  location, 
appear  in  the  following  table. 


47 


Figure  4. 


48 

Table  16.— NUMBER  OF  OFFENSES  KNOWN,  NUMBER  AND  PER- 
CENTAGE CLEARED  BY  ARREST,  1952,  BY  GEOGRAPHIC 
DIVISIONS 


[Population  figures  from  1950  decennial  census] 


Criminal  homi- 

cide 

Bur- 
glary— 

Geographic  division 

Mur- 
der, 
nonneg- 
ligent 
man- 
slaugh- 
ter 

Man- 
slaugh- 
ter by 
negli- 
gence 

Rape 

Rob- 
bery 

Aggra- 
vated 
assault 

break- 
ing or 
enter- 
ing 

Lar- 
ceny- 
theft 

Auto 
theft 

TOTAL,  All  DIVISIONS 

1,706      cities;      total      population. 

61,592,916: 

Number  of  offenses  known 

3.123 

2,106 

7,242 

37,  755 

51,677 

242,  883 

595, 301 

113,  892 

Number  cleared  by  arrest 

2,908 

1,842 

5,661 

13,  581 

38, 748 

64,  868 

118, 123 

29,542 

Percentage  cleared  by  arrest 

93.1 

87.5 

78.2 

36.0 

75.0 

26.7 

19.8 

25.9 

New  England  States: 

141     cities;     total     population, 

5.122,763: 

Number  of  offenses  known . .  _ 

58 

177 

274 

654 

641 

12.  025 

30.  763 

6,000 

Number  cleared  by  arrest 

51 

166 

255 

328 

571 

4.204 

7.791 

1  963 

Percentage  cleared  by  arrest- 

87.9 

93.8 

93.1 

50.2 

89.1 

35.0 

25.3 

32.7 

Middle  Atlantic  States: 

391     cities;     total    population. 

16,452,118: 

Number  of  offenses  known .  _  _ 

489 

549 

1,731 

10,  442 

10,  884 

63,  922 

118,  776 

21,  214 

Number  cleared  by  arrest 

421 

475 

1.330 

2,734 

7,173 

11,519 

16,  318 

4,518 

Percentage  cleared  by  arrest. 

86.1 

86.5 

76.8 

26.2 

65.9 

18.0 

13.7 

31.3 

East  North  Central  States: 

437     cities;     total     population. 

16,410,141: 

Number  of  oflenses  known . . . 

792 

468 

2,197 

12,  518 

12.  529 

53.  447 

155.  327 

28,068 

Number  cleared  by  arrest 

743 

404 

1,681 

4,789 

9.353 

17.536 

35,  030 

8,790 

Percentage  cleared  by  arrest- 

93.8 

86.3 

76.5 

38.3 

74.7 

32.8 

22.6 

31.3 

West  North  Central  States: 

186    cities;     total     population. 

5,263,126: 

Number  of  offenses  known .  _  _ 

234 

112 

549 

2,699 

3,542 

18, 134 

49,904 

8,706 

Number  cleared  by  arrest 

217 

101 

415 

1,085 

2,448 

4,821 

9,693 

2,474 

Percentage  cleared  by  arrest. 

92.7 

90.2 

75.6 

40.2 

69.1 

26.6 

19.4 

28.4 

South  Atlantic  States: ' 

152     cities;     total     population. 

5,945,216: 

Number  of  offenses  known . 

661 

263 

835 

3.  586 

15,  959 

30.  144 

66,  555 

16,485 

Number  cleared  by  arrest 

626 

253 

701 

1.734 

13.050 

10.  066 

18.  055 

3.760 

Percentage  cleared  by  arrest  . 

94.7 

96.2 

84.0 

48.4 

81.8 

33.4 

27.1 

22.8 

East  South  Central  States: 

51      cities;      total     population. 

1,775,538: 

Number  of  oflenses  known.   _ 

213 

94 

202 

1,051 

2,  055 

8,497 

14,  173 

4.299 

Number  cleared  by  arrest 

204 

86 

171 

323 

1,516 

1,953 

2,944 

944 

Percentage  cleared  by  arrest 

95.8 

91.5 

84.7 

30.7 

73.8 

23.0 

20.8 

22.0 

West  South  Central  States: 

83     cities;     total     population. 

3,887,462: 

Number  of  offenses  known . 

455 

179 

541 

1,936 

3,582 

20,532 

46.733 

11.  162 

Number  cleared  by  arrest 

443 

173 

441 

823 

2,860 

5,720 

10,608 

2,826 

Percentage  cleared  by  arrest. 

97.4 

96.6 

81.5 

42.5 

79.8 

27.9 

22.7 

25.3 

Mountain  States: 

76     cities;     total     population, 
1,596,632: 
Number  of  offenses  known... 

57 

38 

183 

971 

585 

8,367 

26.  392 

3.803 

Number  cleared  by  arrest 

55 

25 

130 

442 

420 

2,506 

5,003 

1.051 

Percentage  cleared  by  arrest. 
Pacific  States: 

189     cities;     total     population, 

96.5 

65.8 

71.0 

45.5 

71.8 

30.0 

19.0 

27.6 

5,139,920: 

Number  of  offenses  known . . 

164 

226 

730 

3,898 

1,900 

27.820 

86,  678 

14.  155 

Number  cleared  by  arrest 

148 

159 

537 

1,323 

1.357 

6,  543      12.  681 

3.216 

Percentage  cleared  by  arrest. 

90.2 

70.4 

73.6 

33.9 

71.4 

23.5 

14.6 

22.7 

'  Includes  the  District  of  Columbia. 


49 

Persons  Charged,  1952 

During  1952,  1  out  of  24  persons  was  arrested  and  charged  by  city 
police  for  some  violation  more  serious  than  traffic.  For  traffic  viola- 
tions, 1  out  of  4  persons  was  formally  charged  according  to  the  reports 
of  1,706  cities  having  a  combined  population  of  61.6  million. 

Generally,  the  larger  cities  report  more  persons  arrested  and 
charged  per  unit  of  population,  but  in  1952,  there  were  more  persons 
arrested  and  charged  per  imit  of  population  m  the  smallest  city  group 
for  drunken  driving  and  dealing  in  stolen  property. 

Cities  over  250,000  in  population  were  lowest  in  the  rate  of  persons 
charged  for  forger}^,  liquor  law  violations,  driving  while  intoxicated, 
and  drunkenness. 

The  basis  of  scoring  data  concerning  persons  charged  is  the  number 
of  persons  and  not  the  number  of  charges  placed  against  a  person. 
Questionnaires  collected  with  the  reports  aid  in  obtaining  uniformity 
in  the  compilation  of  these  data.  Of  the  1,706  reports  used,  only  4.7 
percent  were  based  on  the  number  of  charges  placed  rather  than  the 
number  of  persons  charged.  In  addition,  letters  were  written  to  829 
or  48.6  percent  of  these  police  departments  concerning  the  data  in- 
cluded in  the  annual  reports. 

As  indicated  above,  one  person  may  be  arrested  and  charged  for 
the  commission  of  several  offenses  or  several  persons  involved  in  one 
crime  may  be  arrested  and  charged.  Accordingly,  the  number  of 
persons  charged  will  not  agree  with  the  number  of  offenses  cleared 
by  arrest. 

Juvenile  offenders  arrested  and  charged  by  the  police  are  included 
in  the  accompanying  data  and  over  91  percent  of  the  1,706  police 
departments  reported  that  all  or  some  juveniles  were  represented  in 
the  entries.  Of  these,  over  93  percent  included  all  juveniles.  Of  the 
returns  reporting  juveniles,  98.9  percent  included  juvenile  arrests 
opposite  the  classification  indicating  the  crime  committed,  such  as 
robbery,  burglary,  etc.,  even  though  some  technical  charge  such  as 
"juvenile  delinquent"  may  have  been  placed  against  the  offender. 

Only  17  departments  reported  juvenile  arrests  opposite  "all  other 
offenses"  rather  than  the  classification  indicating  the  nature  of  the 
offense  committed. 


50 


Table  17.— PERSONS  CHARGED  (HELD  FOR  PROSECUTION),  1952, 
NUMBER  AND  RATE  PER  100,000  INHABITANTS,  BY  POPULATION 
GROUPS 

[Population  figures  from  1950  decennial  census] 


Offense  charged 


TOTAL 


1,706 
cities; 
total 
popula- 
tion, 
61,592,916 


Criminal  homicide: 

(a)  Murder  and  nonneg- 

ligent  manslaughter: 
Number    of    persons 

charged 

Rate  per  100,000 

(b)  Manslaughter  by  neg- 

ligence: 
Number    of    persons 

charged 

Rate  per  100,000 

Robbery: 

Number       of       persons 

charged 

Rate  per  100,000 

Aggravated  assault: 

Number       of       persons 

charged 

Rate  per  100,000 

Other  assaults: 

Number       of       persons 

charged 

Rate  per  100,000 

Burglary — breaking  or  enter- 
ing: 
Number       of       persons 

charged 

Rate  perlOO.OOO 

Larceny — theft: 

Number       of       persons 

charged 

Rate  per  100,000 

Auto  theft: 

Number       of       persons 

charged ._ 

Rate  per  100,000 

Embezzlement  and  fraud: 
Number       of       persons 

charged 

Rate  per  100,000 

Stolen  property;  buying,  re- 
ceiving, possessing: 
Number       of       persons 

charged 

Rate  per  100,000 

Forgery  and  counterfeiting: 
Number       of       persons 

charged-- 

Rate  per  100,000 

Rape: 

Number       of       persons 

charged 

Rate  per  100,000 

Prostitution  and  commercial- 
ized vice: 
Number       of       persons 

charged 

Rate  per  100,000 .._. 

Sex  offenses  (except  rape  and 
prostitution) : 
Number       of       persons 

charged -. 

Rate  per  100,000 

Narcotic  drug  laws: 

Number       of       persons 

charged 

Rate  per  100,000 


2,929 
4.76 


1,824 
2 


13,  653 
22.2 


31,  865 
51.7 


1  91,  072 
147.9 


47,  018 
76.3 


89,  028 
144.5 


25,  415 
41.3 


14,  609 
23.7 


3  4,  497 
7.3 


9,185 
14.9 


5,459 
8 


28,094 
45.6 


21,  102 
34.3 


10,218 
16 


Group  I 


31  cities 
over 

250,000; 

popula- 
tion, 

27,861,794 


1,740 
6.25 


949 
3.41 


9,390 
33.7 


17,  554 
63.0 


35, 344 
126.9 


21,  997 
79.0 


40.  258 
144.5 


12,  90 
46.3 


7,126 
25.6 


2,338 
8.4 


3,512 
12.6 


3,  365 
12.08 


17,895 
64.2 


9,429 
33.8 


8, 022 
28.8 


Group  II 


51  cities, 
100,000 

to 
250,000; 
popula- 
tion, 
7,361,057 


362 
4.92 


268 
3.64 


1,409 
19.1 


3.330 
45.2 


15,  578 
211.6 


5,948 
80.8 


11,716 
159.2 


3, 335 
4,5.3 


2,783 
37.8 


533 
7.2 


1,280 
17.4 


530 
7.20 


4,638 

as.o 


3,  44S 
46.8 


Group  III 


Group  IV 


97  cities, 
,50,000  to 
100,000; 
popula- 
tion, 
6,859,727 


194  cities, 
25,000  to 
,50,000; 
popula- 
tion, 
6,810,619 


279 
4.07 


185 
2.70 


1,027 
15.0 


4,431 
64.6 


12, 027 
175.3 


4,674 
68.1 


10, 198 
148.7 


2,297 
33.5 


1.229 
17.9 


309 
4.5 


1,228 
17.9 


406 
5.92 


3,234 
47.1 


2,305 
33.6 


631 
9.2 


523  cities, 
10,000  to 
25,000; 
popula- 
tion, 
8,086,433 


Group  V 


244 
3.58 


794 
11.7 


2,570 
37.7 


10,  940 
160.6 


5,513 
80.9 


10,501 
154.2 


2,558 
37.6 


1.581 
23.2 


391 

5.7 


1,079 
15.8 


1,436 
21.1 


2,982 
43.8 


308 
4.5 


200 
2.47 


146 
1.81 


2,824 
34.9 


2  11,619 
143.9 


5,191 
64.2 


10,395 
128.5 


2,640 
32.6 


1.186 
14.7 


530 
6.6 


1,349 
16.7 


475 
5.87 


541 
6.7 


2,092 
25.9 


243 
3.0 


See  footnotes  at  end  of  table. 


51 

Table  17.— PERSONS  CHARGED  (HELD  FOR  PROSECUTION),  1952, 
NUMBER  AND  RATE  PER  100,000  INHABITANTS,  BY  POPULATION 
GROUPS— Continued 

[Population  figures  from  1950  decennial  census] 


TOTAL 

Group  I 

Group  II 

Group  III 

Group  IV 

Group  V 

Group  VI 

Offense  charged 

1,706 
cities; 
total 
popula- 
tion, 
61,592,916 

31  cities 
over 

250,000; 

popula- 
tion, 

27,861,794 

51  cities, 
100,000 

to 
250,000; 
popula- 
tion, 
7,361,057 

97  cities, 
50,000  to 
100,000; 
popula- 
tion, 
6,859,727 

194  cities, 

25,000  to 
50,000; 

popula- 
tion, 

6,810,619 

523  cities, 
10,000  to 
25,000; 
popula- 
tion, 
8,086,433 

810  cities 
under 
10,000; 

popula- 
tion, 

4,613,286 

Weapons;   carrying,   possess- 
ing, et,c.: 
Number       of       persons 

charged _ 

Rate  per  100,000 . 

16,  933 
27.5 

6  32,  239 
52.4 

'  40,  051 
65.0 

»  112, 770 
186.4 

13 16,336,957 
28,393.4 

328,  639 
533.6 

1,114,932 
1,810.2 

114,048 
185.2 

86,  258 
140,0 

2»  298, 083 
484.1 

8,805 
31.6 

14,  368 
51.6 

12,  320 
44.2 

I"  28,  695 
106.6 

14  5,953,628 
23,  755. 1 

168, 618 
605.2 

465,  856 
1,636.1 

51,  225 
183.9 

62,  241 
223.4 

151, 848 
545.0 

1,996 
27.1 

4,096 
55.6 

7,169 
97.4 

11  15,411 
213.0 

15  2,803,354 
41, 832.  5 

36, 433 
494.9 

181,315 
2,  463.  2 

24, 931 
338.7 

8,999 
122.3 

28,255 
383.8 

2,145 
31.3 

4,733 
69.0 

6,881 
100.3 

16,937 
246.9 

18  2,252,951 
33, 867.  9 

36,  334 
529.  7 

140, 003 
2, 040.  9 

13,294 
193.8 

5,874 
85.6 

32,  778 
477.8 

1,694 
24.9 

3,901 
57.3 

4,626 
67.9 

IS,  476 
227.2 

■"2,100,882 
31,  480.  8 

29,824 
437.9 

120,  055 
1,762.8 

9,877 
145.0 

4,115 
60.4 

35,  265 
517.8 

1,435 
17.7 

«  3,  714 
46.1 

5,594 
69.2 

12  21,314 
264.3 

18  2,179,088 
27,  438.  9 

33, 809 
418.1 

135, 088 
1,670.6 

8,669 
107.2 

3,112 
38.5 

21  33, 077 
409.9 

858 
18.6 

Offenses  against  family  and 
children: 
Number  of  personscharged. 
Rate  per  100,000 

1,427 
30.9 

Liquor  laws: 

Number  of  persons  charged. 
Rate  per  100,000 

8  3,  461 
75.1 

Driving  while  intoxicated: 
Number  of  personscharged. 
Rate  per  100,000 

14,937 
323.  8 

Traffic  and  motor  vehicle  laws: 
Number  o f  persons  charged . 
Rate  per  100,000.     .   

19  1,047,054 
23,  233.  5 

Disorderly  conduct: 

Number  o  f  persons  charged . 
Rate  per  100,000        -  - .     . 

23,  621 
512.0 

Drunkenness: 

Number  of  persons  charged . 
Rate  per  100,000 .- 

82,615 
1,  790. 8 

Vagrancy: 

Number  of  persons  charged . 
Rate  per  100,000        

6,052 
131.2 

Gambling: 

Number  of  personscharged. 
Rate  per  100,000     

1,912 
41.4 

AH  other  offenses: 

Number  0 f  persons  charged . 
Rate  per  100,000 _ 

22 16, 860 
366.0 

Footnotes  1-22:  The  number  of  persons  charged  and  the  rate  are  based  on  the  reports  from  the  number  of 
cities  indicated  below: 


Footnote 

Cities 

Population 

Footnote 

Cities 

Population 

1                

1,705 

522 
1,705 

809 
1,704 

521 
1,705 

809 

1,703 

30 

50 

61,580,343 

8, 073, 860 
61,582,962 

4, 603,  332 
61,562,841 

8, 056,  358 
61,585,740 

4,606,110 
60, 497,  343 
26,912,086 

7,  236,  288 

12        

522 

1,665 

29 

46 

94 

190 

514 

792 

1,704 

522 

809 

8,065  337 

2       

13 

14 

15 

16         

57,  537, 854 

3 

25,062,518 
6,  701  386 

4       

5  -   

6,  652, 173 

6 

17 

18         -       

6  673  529 

7       

7,941,591 

8 

19 

20 

4,  506,  657 

9 

61,568,959 

10 

21         

8, 069,  510 

11 - 

22 

4,  606,  252 

Traffic  and  motor  vehicle  law  violations  other  than  driving  while 
intoxicated  were  not  separately  reported  by  all  cities  represented  in 
Table  17.  Separate  figures  were  available  in  the  reports  of  1,405  of 
these  cities  for  (1)  violations  of  road  and  driving  laws,  considered  as 
moving  violations,  (2)  parking  violations,  and  (3)  other  traffic  and 
motor  vehicle  law  violations  excluding  driving  while  intoxicated. 
These  figures  are  presented  in  Table  18. 


62 


Table  18— PERSONS  CHARGED  (HELD  FOR  PROSECUTION),  TRAFFIC 
VIOLATIONS,  EXCEPT  DRIVING  WHILE  INTOXICATED,  1952; 
NUMBER  AND  RATE  PER  100,000  INHABITANTS,  BY  POPULATION 
GROUPS 

[Population  figures  from  1950  decennial  census] 


Total 

Group  I 

Group  II 

Group  III 

Group  IV 

Group  V 

GroupVI 

Offense  charged 
I 

1,405 
cities; 
total  pop- 
ulation, 
49,651,356 

23  cities 
over 

250,000; 

popula- 
tion, 

22,076,962 

39  cities, 
100,000  to 

250,000; 

popula- 
tion, 
5,788,516 

84  cities, 
50,000  to 
100,000; 
popula- 
tion, 
5,862,869 

160  cities, 
25,000  to 
50,000; 
popula- 
tion, 
5,602,424 

404  cities, 
10,000  to 
25,000; 
popula- 
tion, 
6,349,849 

695  cities 
under 
10,000; 

popula- 
tion, 

3,970,736 

Road  and  driving  laws: 

Number  of  persons  charged . 
Rate  per  100,000      

2,517,318 
5, 070.  0 

11, 073, 156 
22,  301.  8 

638,  151 
1,  285.  3 

1,331,590 
6,031.6 

3,521.411 
15,950.6 

328,  323 
1,  487.  2 

296,407 
5, 120.  6 

1,961,089 
33, 879.  0 

75,  179 
1,  298. 8 

284, 116 
4, 846. 0 

1,  704, 070 
29, 065.  5 

72.270 
1,  232.  7 

203,  397 
3,630.5 

1.  538,  658 
27,  464. 1 

48.  712 
869.5 

242,  687 
3,821.9 

1,  586, 943 
24,991.8 

67.295 
1,059.8 

159,  121 
4,007  3 

Parking  violations: 

Number  of  persons  charged. 
Rate  per  100,000      

760,  985 
19, 164.  8 

Other  traffic  and  motor  vehicle 
laws: 
Number  of  persons  charged  _ 
Rate  per  100,000 

46,  372 
1, 167.  8 

Stepped-up  police  activity  responded  to  the  8.1  percent  city  crime 
increase  in  1952.^  A  comparison  of  the  number  of  persons  charged 
in  1951  and  1952  in  terms  of  units  of  general  population  with  the  1952 
city  crime  trends  reflects  certain  close  correlations. 

A  rise  of  8.5  ^  percent  in  city  murders  was  accompanied  by  a  3.7 
percent  increase  in  persons  charged.  Robberies  increased  11.2  per- 
cent and  the  police  charged  12.1  percent  more  persons  in  this  category. 
Negligent  manslaughters  (mostly  traffic  deaths)  rose  6.2  percent  and 
13.0  percent  more  persons  were  charged.  Aggravated  assaults  oc- 
curred with  12.5  percent  greater  frequency  and  police  arrested  and 
charged  9.8  percent  more  persons.  The  larceny  classification  was 
the  exception  with  4.2  percent  less  persons  charged  during  a  time  of 
7.1  percent  increase  in  this  crime. 

A  study  of  crime  figures  arranged  by  geographic  areas  indicates 
that  the  number  of  persons  charged  corresponds  generally  ^\^th  the 
incidence  of  crime.  Police  in  areas  having  consistently  high  crime 
rates  arrest  and  charge  more  persons  per  unit  of  population  than  do 
the  police  in  the  more  crime  free  areas.  For  this  obvious  reason, 
police  in  a  given  jurisdiction  find  it  significant  to  compare  their  local 
crime  data  with  the  averages  presented  for  their  particular  geo- 
graphic area.  In  addition,  it  should  be  noted  that  laws  and  local 
customs  affecting  the  placing  of  charges  against  arrested  persons  vary 
greatly  between  the  sections  of  the  country. 

Figures  from  the  1,706  cities  presented  in  the  foregoing  tabulations 
of  this  section  are  arranged  in  the  following  table  by  geographic 
divisions  along  with  the  number  of  persons  charged  in  terms  of  units 
of  100,000  population. 

>  Uniform  Crime  Reports,  Annual  Bulletin,  1952,  Volume  XXIII,  No.  2. 


53 


n 

< 


^ 

c^  t^ 

000 

0  OS 

CM  t^ 

t^co 

OS  CO 

r^  CO 

^}4  T-l 

CO  t>"      o»co 

0  _ 

cc  to       ^  ro 

CO      . 

CD      . 

CD     . 

00      . 

CO     . 

OS        . 

CD     .        rt     . 

M           O^ 

CM  CO 

0  0 

t^  CO 

•^  t^ 

■^  CO 

CM  •* 

OS  00        CM  -^ 

O   CO 

0)        .«  Ol 

""  oi      "^  cs 

.(N 

»C< 

.t- 

.00 

-00 

.CD 

ss 

•Ss-s^. 

CO 

•* 

05-H 

CO 

§« 

•-,*;—  oi 

"  o  3CO 

fL,CO 

'^     ft 

.g 

C3„ 

0  CO       t^  05 

10  »-l 

CM  01 

OS  00 

10  CD 

0  -H 

r^CM      ■*•* 

;„"     Qi^ 

K.-H      c^io 

00      . 

00      . 

0    . 

r^    . 

00      ■ 

CD      .        .1      . 

03  m 

"S 

mco 

CM  t~ 

CDO 

-«i  1- 

00  "O 

TJ-OS        CMCO 

cc            ^ 

CM 

.t^ 

.0 

10 

CM               rH 

11 

CO'CM 

"5  sa 

OO) 

»■"  ft"^. 

s 

ft 

g 

C-, 

t^-*      t~o 

t~<» 

t~-* 

CO'* 

OS  t~- 

COt^ 

000 

CO  U3        OSOS 

S-^co 

m          0'5 

tO'^        05  »o 

-#    . 

ta    . 

CD      . 

CM      . 

00      . 

t^      .         CM      . 

«    .            . 

OCD 

0  CM 

O-H 

0  -* 

t^OO 

t^iO 

OOCM        CM>0 

9  "-S 

01               (M 

.<o 

.00 

.0 

-OS 

.-* 

N 

£6^ 

•— ' 

CM 

t^^ 

Tj*  rt 

t~rt 

O   O   3  QO 

«■"  ft«i 

OO          OCO 

ft 

iS 

^"qo 

f-i  »o        05  0 

t^  t^ 

xn-r^ 

0  CM 

COO 

CM  CM 

CM  00 

■*OS        OS  CM 

(N-*         ^  p. 

00      . 

•0    . 

OS       . 

CM      . 

00      .         OS      . 

D  03  m 

0  00 

01  0 

0  CM 

Tf   t^ 

00  OS 

CM  00 

lOCM        w-H 

O  t.  a^ 

5|*5 

C^               CD 

CO 

.00 

.CO 

.CD 

CO               " 

1— 1  1—1 

10  CM 

C0"CM 

o    O    p  t^ 

w 

ft 

•-     0,^ 

CO  WO       01  -^ 

CM  -a< 

0  ■-I 

CO  CM 

CM  0 

^  t^ 

CM  00 

OSO         -HIO 

o  ^ 

m       o  ^ 

CD  I--         00  to 

0    . 

OS      . 

OS       . 

OS      . 

^    .     t)"    . 

S-hSS 

CD      .         CO      . 

r^  »o 

CO  CM 

CO  -. 

coo 

r~  CO 

..Hco      r^  IN 

•-  *^  S  -O 
U    O   3  -^ 

S               CD 

-•* 

m'"^ 

0:'2 

co'c^ 

CO 

CO 

"^^s 

'^         ft 

g 

•  -         C  rr, 

CO  O)        -^00 

co-< 

CM  C^ 

00  CM 

OS  00 

0 1^ 

t^r^ 

osio      —leo 

t-  '^ 

S     sS 

(N  M         001 

ai    . 

»c     . 

OS      . 

■* 

—      .         CO      . 

O   03  en 

CS      .         rt      . 

t^m 

00  CD 

t^  CM 

»-(  cs 

os  ^ 

0  OS 

OS  t^        CO  0 

2^1 

5  5  a  Zr 

Tf                     ^ 

co''" 

.« 

CD" 

CM« 

a 

^ 

•-     c« 

0  -H         r-<  CM 

t~o 

rj<  lO 

000 

010 

CO  CM 

■OlO 

CMCM        OOCM 

»-« r2   -, 

2    .2^ 

OS  00        CO  0 

■*    . 

OS      . 

0      . 

CO    .      r~    . 

O  03  m 

I^      .         CO      . 

•«i^  ^ 

•*co 

lO  OS 

00  CO 

moo 

■*t~          -Hf- 

IS'" 

1^  -^  Q,     - 

■«>          M 

-CM 

-co 

.»c 

-co 

.CO 

.CM 

CO 

lO 

Os"S 

OS 

M 

CD 

■*               rt 

2     §2 

Oi  ^         Tf  00 

0>05 

OS  CM 

CO  ■>»> 

00  1-- 

CM  ■« 

Ort 

000        rt  OS 

ai.S  tn 

(N  CD         1^  00 

r^    . 

■* 

CO      . 

lO      . 

CD      . 

CD      .         t^      . 

.2  ^^           r^ 

Tf      .         ■*      . 

o>t^ 

0  " 

CD  CM 

C-»'!)< 

^  t- 

OS  CM        OSiO 

^  03  03 

5  s  "S  c^" 

.tT 

-OS 

."O 

.CM 

CO 

•0 

00 

CM 

•^ 

T3 

•-    Cr« 

-HO         >0(N 

00 

•a<io 

OS  t^ 

OS  t^ 

CMO 

■nos 

rtOO        lOrt 

w        Og 

too        CO  C4 

OS     . 

10    . 

t^ 

CO      . 

oc     . 

CM      .         "      . 

III 

•^oo 

coco 

CM  CM 

OS  t^ 

t^  CM 

U50 

CMCp         T(.O0 

sils- 

rt       "m 

o-S 

co-^ 

coS 

-CO 

.CM        ^ 

"  0  3(N 

. 

Oa  CD        r^  CD 

mck 

*n  t^ 

CM  OS 

cxseo 

tnio 

■ooo 

<35  t-        t~0O 

w       Ceo 

01  t^         (MO) 

CD 

t~      . 

<M 

0    .      a    . 

< 

CD  C4 

00  -H 

o»~ 

OCD 

O-* 

.=J<^ 

COCO       ■*»- 

't;  -s  '-s  ■=". 

0^  03CV1 

-»d*         -oi 

-■* 

.■<* 

.oa 

(M               •> 

CO* 

OS  -H 

0 

^           tr 

O 

CO 

oa 

tj- 

CO 

IM 

£1 

0  CD 

-.     a 

1     1  bil    !     1 

Ml    , 
B,    1 

;  ;.g  1  : 

S  i 

''oil 

03      1 

1   1  a  1   1 

e^ 

S-d   1 

.    1  bio    •    ' 

;  !.g  ;  ; 

fcXl 

^  ID 

~  03     ' 

•a   ; 

•0    ; 

■a   ;' 

bi-o 

T3    ; 

•d 

■0   :  >■«   : 

^■9  ' 

'o 

^ 

0  =» 

0 

®    T;  » 

C3 

bO 

tc 

&£     1 

C  bJJ 

bfl     I 

be 

-     1- 

J3 

1-1 

t-l 

r"  J.^ 

Ui 

0 

03    M 

a  M 

C8 

<fl 

c«     ', 

£  =8 

^  ; 

OS 

C3        £  C3 

■y-a  ■    -a  ' 
3"  i^sB"  ; 

13  a 

K,  a    . 

J3    ; 

j3  : 

J3     . 

0)  " 

J3     1 

J3 

e 

0     1 

u     > 

CI      < 

0 

d  ; 

fl     i 

a    • 

0  a 

a   ' 

a 

2S    ;.Sa    ; 

0 

..X)  ^■oS  ao" 

°o 

•■go 

go 

Sgo 

gd 

go 

—  0 _;  >*> °c) 
"2  £0  3  £0 
a  00.Q  c/o 

ca  c  — 0 jjv-o 

%-l  0 

if  u.  0 

sl§ 

So 

"0 

•?■  f  ■-  *-  3  'H  ^ 
•a^  3  £8^2  3  03 

C/  0 

|ft| 

00 

(DO 

fto 

fto 

^  fto 

..  ao- 

fto 

03  fto"  •  -  fto 

V-O 

..v,0 

CS—O 

*j^  0 

=^  1. 1- 

^   0  " 

1  Z  0 

0   O'^ 

O" 

C  O"  v  O-- 
O;   I_  !-  CD   u  t. 

%%. 

t3  0)  oj  3  0  g 

SX!   ft  03X3   ft 

fi  3  d  „  3  d 

a      0 

fe  3-S 

>  3  03 

a  as 

■^  3  03 

^  3d 

k% 

5  3d 

|3    e 

q 

■a2;rt 

c3 

a 

0 

rt 

<1 

0 

m 

hj 

< 

H         £ 

54 


w 

H 

-<: 
p^ 

Q 

§-« 

P5    G 

W  --^S  _ 

W   §  B 

§o  1 

^    I  " 

2^     I 

o  '-^  s 
^  ill    ?. 

r^  P-i     an 


E  o 

Ph  o 
o  , 

Q 

W 

Q 

O 
P^ 
<1 

O 

CO 

O 
CO 
Pi 
W 
Pi 


a2 


3  03  in 


O  C3  5P 


O  g  2 

IS- 


"O  03  03 


00         S"u5- 


sp     .2  c 

"5  3f 


o  o  31^ 


■o 


o-< 


S_.22 
12      om 


00  Q    10 


.«  2  03o 


S    .2  2 

S  il  03  of 

i  22 


>00 


0>  00 

t^M 

1^06 

00 

OU5 

CIO(N 

»aO 

r^^ 

0  00 

O      - 


000        00O5        »■* 


=  S         ". 


S5* 


003     0000     o>o     000 


"5  0J 


oo—      «co 


00« 


-C^  -00  --H 


^  to      -^  <o      -H  to      r*  o>      *o  00      r*  00 


3  to      M  00      wa» 


_,      tc  —      — 


055     og 


mto 


t^  CO      to  »o 


—ito 
«  . 
oooo 


)  •-(      tooo     ■«»'« 


cc  00      **  to      o>  1-t      -^c*      00  »o 


i-H  -t^ 


to      -       rt 


CO'*        "OM         O-^         005        toco        Ot^ 


>-H        tO-<        CO 


fs*^ 

s« 

3=° 

-<CO 

00      . 

«?s 

«i?< 

toco 

-10 

IS 

CI  o 

-^    . 

cc  o 


CO(N        to  (N        00O5        OtO        ^t^  t~CJ  Ol  Oi 

toes        t^.        C«.        O.        Cfl.  C^.  ■^. 

•<r      .        iOtC         t^ -^        ^  t-H         M  10  t^  CO  .^  CO 

"-<  .>0  -CO 


»r3  ^ 


CC  o 


I-"      .        00  O 


00      .        CO      . 

r-  to      ^  CO 


05^  W -"tf^  N  00  OS  »o  tcco 
to  .  rj*  .  00  .  to  .  00  . 
■^  ^        ON        CO  00        »0  OS        05-^ 


i-H  IN 


® 


ft 


U30 


OS  »0         O  (N         to  OS        COiC 


—  o 

So 


00 
>oo 


OOm  OSTf 
OS  .  00  . 
O  ^        CO  ^t* 


—  00 


OS  »—      co»o 


tc  M         C^  IM 


2^        MO       00  to       t^tO        tot^        t^  •'f 
CO    .      OS    .      to    .      r^    .      00    . 

S  t^        to  OS         CO  to         M  t^         t^  ^^         00  ^H 


<  OS        tc  -< 

-     .      t^    . 

s  t^      to  OJ 

^10      co'oo 
?3  — 


2°    c3  = 


C-)  cq      OS  ■ 


c^  -^  00 1^ 

t^os  Scd 

.00  -OS 

C»—  tc  TC 


O"*  ^Tj"  osw  e»« 

t^CD  OSco  CDOO  OdO 

<M*"^  5S'«  00'»«  Tj<'t)0 

-H  2     -  «  -<     - 

^  00  00  eo  ^-H 


55 


^ 


-^ 

»^ 

OIN 

rt  lO         1 

s 

o>o 

C^ltO 

a>c<i 

t-"o       • 

CO  t^ 

OiO 

Ǥ 

«;d 

t^ 

^-8 

(^  -^ 

iCO 

-^^  t^ 

050 

oo> 

l~-N 

"^s 

to     . 

t-o 

CC^ 

"^ 

05  CO 

o>a 

W05 

-HO 

S 

r-.-<t> 

■*« 

<oai 

«o 

"'" 

!N  O 

©■■a" 

" 

-e 

T3 

tS    ' 

03 

03     ! 

^ 

x; 

x: 

o 

s 

c 

a    '■ 

f^^ 

gd 

®c 

*c 

Wt- 

-      ftc 

"Sfto 

G- 

o- 

C  O-i 

;h   t~ 

i^  >- 

£  i-  5? 

..^  C 

"ti^  = 

i.oj:  a 

S'U^ 

.5  Si 

55§« 

2^P: 

^za 

C9 

rri 

> 

0 

<i 

;  (N  t^  »c  oo  o»  lO  tD 

?  t^  (N  '*  00  lO  OS  00 
5  CD  05  ^  tN  03  '-'  GO 


C^  OS  CD  00  "0  OS  ^ 

iO '^"  i-T  cc  .-T  Tt**"  .-T  CD  to" 


cib'^'^oot~*6oo< 


OiOi-iCviCO'*"^CDb- 


(MCCC^OOOi'^OSOl'— ' 
'«r'«S'C^O':CiO--itOOO 

O5ccoior^x)t^ccoo 

■"f"  l^  ^^  iC  Q  tC  CN"  (N  OT 
■^OlfOOSiOfOfO^CD 


CO  o  '-D  •*  '-"  r-  - 


OCOOi-iOiOOOtOTt* 
OSO^U3»OCDCCCaO(M 


0'-i(NCO'^»OcOt-.00 


coooc^osi-*oOTro 

'^cOcDO'>^«3(M-fl* 
CC»OOi0000iOCDb- 

O  t-T  CN  i^f  cs"  t-^  lO' lO 

00OlO0.-tcDO5^00 
iOffCiOi— iiCCOCSiO 

^  CD  "-^  ^ '-""  cd"  ^c  <— r 

CD  i-H  CO         O  '— "         CD 


lOcO^OO-^cDiCiC 

OfOO-^OCOOOO 


(MC0Tj«kOcDt-.00Oi 


56 


PERSONS  FOUND  GUILTY 

(PERCENT  OF  PERSONS  CHARGED  -PART  1  OFFENSES) 
CALENDAR  YEAR  1952 

CRIMES  AGAINST  THE  PERSON 


MURDER 


55.5% 

1,394    Charged 


NEGLIGENT  38.5% 

MANSLAUGHTER        728 

Charged 


RAPE 


56.6% 

2,189  Charged 


AGGRAVATED 
ASSAULT 


50.3% 

14,628   Charged 


208  Cities  Over  25,000  InhabiUnts  Total  Population  25,102,123 


FBI 
CHART 


Figure  5. 

Persons  Found  Guilty,  1952 

Seventy  percent  of  the  persons  charged  with  major  (Part  I)  crime 
by  the  poHce  were  fomid  guilty  in  1952.  Almost  67  percent  of  thos 
charged  with  Part  II  crimes  were  convicted.  Eliminating  traffic  vie 
lations,  other  than  driving  while  intoxicated,  71  percent  of  all  per>()ii 
charged  were  found  guilty. 

Convictions  were  returned  against  over  four-fifths  (88.0  percent)  c 
the  persons  charged  with  driving  while  intoxicated  during  1952.     Thi 


57 

represented  the  highest  conviction  rate  in  any  crime  classification, 
and  a  driver  neghgently  causing  the  death  of  a  person  has  5  times 
more  chance  of  going  free  if  charged  with  manslaughter  by  negligence 
than  an  individual  charged  with  driving  while  intoxicated. 

The  smallest  percentage  of  convictions  (38.5)  for  any  crime  class 
was  recorded  for  persons  charged  with  manslaughter  by  negligence. 
The  second  lowest  rate  of  convictions  was  in  aggravated  assaults 
(50.3  percent  found  guilty).  Although  only  23.0  percent  of  the  lar- 
cenies and  34.8  percent  of  the  burglaries  were  cleared  by  arrest,  76.1 
percent  of  the  persons  charged  with  larceny  and  77.6  percent  of  those 
charged  with  burglary  were  found  guilty.  Other  than  driving  while 
intoxicated  only  forgery  and  counterfeiting  (81.1  percent  guilty)  and 
liquor  law  violations  (81.1  percent  guilty)  had  higher  conviction  rates 
than  burglary  and  larceny. 

The  police  in  208  cities,  combined  population  of  25,102,123,  reported 
the  data  concerning  the  number  of  persons  found  guilty  presented 
in  tables  20  and  21.  Such  information  is  collected  by  the  police  for 
administrative  use  on  the  local  level.  Questionnaires  accompanying 
the  individual  returns  and  correspondence  assisted  in  selecting  figures 
for  persons  found  guilty  that  represented  final  dispositions  rather  than 
preliminary  or  other  interim  findings.  Certain  classifications  are  not 
individually  presented  because  sufficient  detail  was  not  available  in 
some  of  the  usable  reports. 

T^BLE  20.— OFFENSES  KNOWN,  CLEARED  BY  ARREST  AND  NUMBER 
OF  PERSONS  FOUND  GUILTY,  1952;  208  CITIES  OVER  25,000  IN 
POPULATION 


[Total  population  25,102,123  based  on  1950  decennial  census] 


Offense  (Part  I  classes) 


Total.. 

Criminal  homicide: 

(a)  Murder  and  nonneg- 

ligent  manslaughter. 

(b)  Manslaughter  by  neg- 

ligence  

Rape 

Robbery 

Aggravated  assault 

Burglary — breaking  or  enter- 
ing...  

Larceny— theft  (except  auto 

theft) 

Auto  theft 


Number  of  offenses 


Known 
to  the 
police 


432, 834 


1,113 

765 
3,075 
13, 949 
23,783 

90, 435 

254,639 
45, 075 


Cleared 

by 
arrest 


138, 161 


1,317 

796 
2,839 
8,062 
21,299 

31, 507 

58, 677 
13,  664 


Charged 
{held  for 
prosecu- 
tion) 


1,394 

728 
2,189 
7,063 
14,628 

18,  814 

39,  631 
10, 977 


Number  of  persons 


Found  guilty 


Total 
guilty 


774 

280 
1,238 
5,347 
7,361 

14, 593 

30, 149 
7,100 


Offense 
charged 


57,  780 


573 
235 


4,375 
5,340 


12, 316 


27,884 
6,189 


Lesser 
offense 


9,062 


201 

45 

370 

972 

2,021 

2,277 

2,265 
911 


Percent- 
age 
found 
guilty 


*70.0 


55.5 

38.5 
56.6 
75.7 
50.3 

77.6 

76.1 
64.7 


58 


PERSONS  FOUND  GUILTY 

(PERCENT  OF  PERSONS  CHARGED --PART  1  OFFENSES) 
CALENDAR  YEAR  1952 

CRIMES  AGAINST  PROPERTY 


ROBBERY 


75.7% 

7,063   Charged 


BURGLARY 


LARCENY 


77.6% 

18,814   Charged 


76.1% 

39,631    Charged 


ii.iHi..i...i^.],i.,iiji.i..U...^^^^^^ 


AUTO  THEFT 


64.7% 

10,977    Charged 


208  Cities  Over  25,000  Inhabitants 


Total  Population  25,102,123. 


FBI 
CHART 


Figure  6. 


59 


Table  21.— NUMBER  OF  PERSONS  CHARGED  (HELD  FOR  PROSECU- 
TION) AND  NUMBER  FOUND  GUILTY,  1952,  208  CITIES  OVER 
25,000  IN  POPULATION 

[Total  population,  25,102,123,  based  on  1950  decennial  census] 


Offense  (Part  II  classes) 


Number  of  persons  charged  (held  for  prosecution) 


TOTAL 
CHARGED 


TOTAL__ 

Other  assaults 

Forgery  and  counterfeiting 

Embezzlement  and  fraud 

Stolen  property;  buying,  receiving,  etc 

Weapons;  carrying,  possessing,  etc 

Sex  offenses  (including  prostitution  and  com 

mereialized  vice) 

Offenses  against  the  family  and  children 

Narcotic  drug  laws 

Liquor  laws 

Drunkenness;  disorderly  conduct;  vagrancy . 

Gambling 

Driving  while  intoxicated 

Traffic  and  motor  vehicle  laws 

All  other  offenses 


■8,712,798 


39,  782 
3,385 
7,672 
1,928 
7,742 


24,  366 
15,  641 
4,692 
17,833 

677,  808 
29, 102 
43,  356 
,  710,  242 
129,  249 


Found  guilty 


TOTAL 
GUILTY 


1  5,  819,  772 


24,231 
2,746 
4,891 
987 
5,873 


16,  392 
9,461 
3,316 

14,  456 

499,  858 

19, 117 

38, 134 

2  5, 106,  735 

73,  575 


Offense 
charged 


Lesser 
offense 


1  5,  749,  845  ,    i  70, 127 


23,462 

2,443 

4,540 

910 

5,687 


15,  844 
9,139 
3,274 

14, 084 

497,  218 

18,911 

34,  998 

2  5,047,017 

72, 118 


769 
303 
351 

77 
186 


548 
322 
42 
372 

2.640 

206 

3,136 

2  59,  718 

1,457 


Percent- 
age found 
guilty 


1  66.8 

60.9 
81.  1 
63.  S 
51.2 
75.9 


67.3 
60.5 
70.7 
81.1 

73.7 
6,5.7 
88.0 
66.2 
.56.9 


1  The  total  figures  are  subject  to  footnote  2. 

2  Based  on  the  reports  of  199  cities,  total  population  22,699,776. 


60 


PERSONS  FOUNDtt. 

PERCENT  OF  PERSONS  CHARGED 

PART  II  OFFENSES,  CALENDAR 

YEAR  1952 


OTHER  ASSAULTS 


FORGERY  AND  COUNTERFEITING 


EMBEZZLEMENT  AND  FRAUD 


STOLEN  PROPERTY; 
BUYING,  RECEIVING,  ETC. 


51.2% 


WEAPONS;  CARRYING,  POSSESSING,  ETC 


SEX  OFFENSES  (INCLUDING  PROS- 
TITUTION AND  COMMERCIALIZED  VICE) 


OFFENSES  AGAINST 
FAMILY  AND  CHILDREN 


NARCOTIC  DRUG  LAWS 


LIQUOR  LAWS 


DRUNKENNESS; 

DISORDERLY  CONDUCT;  VAGRANCY 


GAMBLING 


DRIVING  WHILE  INTOXICATED 


TRAFFIC  AND  MOTOR  VEHICLE  LAWS 


ALL  OTHER  OFFENSES 


♦FIGURES  BASED  ON  REPORTS  OF  199  CITIES  WITH  OVER 
25,000  INHABITANTS,  TOTAL  POPULATION  22,699,776 

ALL  OTHER  FIGURES  BASED  ON  REPORTS  OF  208  CITIES  WITH  OVER 
25,000  INHABITANTS,  TOTAL  POPULATION  25,102,123 
FBI  CHART 


Figure  7. 


61 


Persons  Released — Not  Held  for  Prosecution, 

1952 

The  foregoing  tables  of  arrest  figures   pertain   to  those  persons 

arrested  by  the  pohce  against  whom  formal  charges  were  filed. 

The 

following  tables  relate  only  to  those  persons  arrested  by  the 

police 

but  released  without  a  formal  charge  being  placed.     From 

tliis  it 

will  be  noted  that  the  two  tables  which  follow  do  not  includ 

3  data 

relating  to  persons  found  not  guilty  after  having  been  chaiged. 

Persons  who  ignore  a  summons  or  other  notice  to  appear  an 

d  who 

are  not  subsequently  arrested  for  the  omission   are  represen 

ted  in 

the  following  tables.     In  addition,  the  figures  include  formal  warnings 

and  so-called  "golden  rule"  releases.     Individuals  arrested  for  other 

jurisdictions  are  not  included  in  the  report  of  the  arresting  a 

?ency. 

Table  22.— PERSONS  RELEASED  WITHOUT  BEING  HELD  FOR  PROSE- 

CUTION, 1952;  NUMBER  AND  RATE  PER  100,000  INHABITANTS,  BY 

POPULATION  GROUPS 

[Population  figures  from  1950  decennial  census] 

Offense  charged 

TOTAL 

Group  I 

Group  II 

Group  III 

Group  IV 

Group  V 

Group 
VI 

1,141 

cities; 
total 

popula- 
tion, 

35,620,638 

19  cities 
over 

250,000; 

popula- 
tion, 

14,024,833 

26  cities, 
100,000  to 

250,000; 

popula- 
tion, 
3,756,214 

60  cities, 
50,000  to 
100,000; 
popula- 
tion, 
4,245,090 

131  cities, 
25,000  to 

50,000; 

popula- 
tion, 
4,581,402 

380  cities, 
10,000  to 
25,000; 
popula- 
tion, 
5,902,509 

.525  cities 
under 
10,000; 

popula- 
tion, 

3, 110,  590 

Criminal  homicide: 

(a)  Murder  and  nonnegli- 
gent  manslaughter: 
Number  of  persons  re- 
leased  

Rate  per  100,000 

319 
0.90 

164 
0.46 

106 
0.76 

33 
0.24 

41 
1.09 

22 
0.59 

25 
0.59 

33 
0.78 

63 
1.38 

46 
1.00 

80 
1.36 

25 
0.42 

4 
0. 13 

(b)  Manslaughter  by  negli- 
gence: 
Number  of  persons  re- 
leased         . 

5 

Rate  per  100,000 

0.16 

Robbery: 

Number  of  persons  released. 
Rate  per  100,000 

2,121 
6.0 

2,301 
6.5 

7,084 
19.9 

6,244 
17.5 

12,062 
33.9 

2,447 
6.9 

1,368 
3.8 

1440 
1.2 

758 
2.1 

1,244 
8.9 

1,011 
7.2 

3.487 
24.9 

2,113 
15.1 

4,171 
29.7 

725 
5.2 

663 
4.0 

118 
0.8 

137 
1.0 

251 
6.7 

500 
13.3 

1, 1.38 
30.3 

639 
17.0 

1,153 
30.7 

343 
9.1 

267 
7.1 

26 
0.7 

153 
4.1 

175 
4.1 

183 
4.3 

289 
6.8 

426 
10.0 

597 
14.1 

197 
4.6 

41 
1.0 

31 
0.7 

63 
1.5 

225 
4.9 

283 
6.2 

614 
13.4 

993 
21.7 

2,316 
50.6 

410 
8.9 

198 
4.3 

111 
2.4 

120 
2.6 

151 
2.6 

199 
3.4 

851 
14.4 

1,132 
19.2 

2,162 
36.6 

456 
7.7 

219 
3.7 

76 
1.3 

171 
2.9 

75 
2.  4 

Aggravated  assault: 

Number  of  persons  released. 
Rate  per  100,000 

125 
4.0 

Dther  assaults: 

Number  of  persons  released. 
Rate  per  100,000 

705 
22.  7 

Jurglary— breaking  or  entering: 
Number  of  persons  released 
Rate  per  100,000.- - 

941 
30.3 

^arceny— theft: 

Number  of  persons  released. 
Rate  per  100,000 

1,663 
53.5 

Vuto  theft: 

Number  of  persons  released- . 
Rate  per  100,000 

316 
10.2 

Embezzlement  and  fraud: 

Number  of  persons  released.. 
Rate  per  100,000 _. . 

80 
2.  6 

Stolen  property;  buying,  receiv- 
ing, possessmg: 
Number  of  persons  released.. 
Rate  per  100,000 

2  78 
2.5 

^orgery  and  counterfeiting: 
Number  of  persons  released-. 
Rate  per  100,000 

114 
3.7 

iape: 

Number  of  persons  released.. 
Rate  per  100,000 

549 
1.54 

218 
1.55 

90 
2.40 

36 
0.85 

85 
1.86 

77 
1.30 

43 
1.38 

See  footnotes  at  end  of  tat 

le. 

62 


Table  22. -PERSONS  RELEASED  WITHOUT  BEING  HELD  FOR  PROSE- 
CUTION, 1952;  NUMBER  AND  RATE  PER  100,000  INHABITANTS.  BY 
POPULATION  GROUPS— Continued 

[Population  figures  from  1950  decennial  census 


Offense  charged 


Total 


1,141 
cities; 
total 

popula- 
tion, 

35,620,638 


Prostitution  and  commercial- 
ized vice: 

Number  of  persons  released. 

Rate  per  100,000 

Sex  offenses  (except  rape  and 
prostitution): 

Number  of  persons  released . 

Rate  per  100,000.. _-^-_ 

Narcotic  drug  laws: 

Number  of  persons  released. 

Rate  per  100.000..-- 

Weapons;  carrying,  possessing, 
etc.: 

Numberof  persons  released- 

Rate  per  100,000 

Offenses  against  family  and 
children: 

Numberof  persons  released. 

Rate  per  100,000-.- 

Liquor  laws: 

Number  of  [)ersons  released. 

Rate|)i"r  100,000-.. 

Driving  wliile  intoxicated: 

Num  ber  of  persons  released., 

Ra  te  per  100,000. . . 

Traffic  and  motor  vehicle  laws: 

Number  of  persons  released. 

Rate  per  100,000 

Disorderly  conduct: 

Number  of  persons  released. 

Ra  te  per  100,000. . . 

Drunkenness: 

Number  of  persons  released.. 

Rate  per  100,000..- 

Vagrancy: 

Number  of  persons  released. 

Rate  per  100,000.-. 

Oambling: 

N  um  ber  of  persons  released . 

Rate  per  100,000--- 

Suspicion: 

N  uni  ber  of  persons  released . 

Rate  per  10(1.000.-.-  -  -  -- 
All  other  offenses: 

Nuin  ber  of  persons  released- 

Rate  per  100,000 


4,533 
12.7 


1,154 
3.2 


873 
2.5 


891 
2.5 


2,412 


3  1,911 

5.4 

»  1,  833 
5.2 

1,017,528 
3,  080.  9 

11,310 
31.8 

u  77,  770 
218.4 

6.448 
18.1 

3.772 
10.6 

i«  90,  320 
253.6 

22,  925 
64.4 


Group  I 


19  cities 
over 

250,000; 

popula- 
tion, 

14,024,833 


28.4 


271 
1.9 


453 
3.2 


395 

2.8 


758 
5.4 


768 
5.5 


128 
0.9 


'  80,  624 
662.  2 


2,124 
15.1 


38,  729 
276.1 


452 
3.2 


2,811 
20.0 


52.  276 
372.7 


6,007 
42.8 


Group  II 


26  cities, 
100,000  to 

250,000; 

popula- 
tion, 
3,756,214 


240 
6.4 


150 
4.0 


211 

5.6 


152 
4.0 


232 
6.2 

113 
3.0 

6  143 
3.9 

"150,177 
4, 346.  7 

1,175 
31.3 

16,  296 
4.33.  8 


31.9 


207 
5.5 


3, 824 
101.8 


2,004 
53.4 


Group  III 


60  cities, 
50,000  to 
100,000; 
popula- 
tion, 
4,245,090 


55 
1.3 


122 
2.9 


64 
1.5 


72 
1.7 


185 
4.4 


128 
3.0 


175 
4.1 


10  68, 807 
1,680.2 


1,406 
33.1 


5,  725 
134.9 


190 
4.5 


9, 820 
231.3 


1,939 
45.7 


Group  IV 


131  cities, 

25,000  to 
50,000; 
popula- 
tion, 
4,581,402 


41 
0.9 


236 
5.2 


54 
1.2 


79 
1.7 


233 
5.1 

300 
6.5 

308 
6.7 

"200,224 
5,  826. 1 

1,720 
37.5 

4,  553 
99.4 

1.000 
21.8 

231 
5.0 

7,600 
165.9 

4,068 


Group  V 


.380  cities, 
10.000  to 
25,000; 
popula- 
tion, 

5,902,509 


108 
1.8 


242 
4.1 


71 
1.2 


108 
1.8 


593 
10.0 


349 
5.9 


723 
12.2 


'2  323,178 
5,601.6 


2.813 
47.7 


7.824 
132.6 


1.435 
24.3 


232 
3.9 


11,387 
192.9 


4,452 
75.4 


Footnotes  1-17:  The  number  of  persons  released  and  the  rate  are  based  on  the  reports  from  the  number 
of  cities  indicated  below: 


Footnote 


1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 


Cities 


1,140 

524 

1,140 

524 

1,140 

25 

1,117 

18 

24 


Population 


35,  610,  684 

3, 100,  636 
35,  613,  462 

3,103,414 
35,  495,  869 

3,631,445 
33, 02(),  722 
12,175,265 

3, 454, 930 


10 
11 
12 
13 
14 
15 
16 
17 


Cities 


58 
128 
372 
517 

1,140 
524 

1,140 
524 


Popular  ii 


4,  0115. 

4,  466. 

5,  7()9, 
3. 065. 

35,616, 
3,  106. 

35,  614, 
3, 104, 


63 


Table  23.— PERSONS  RELEASED  WITHOUT  BEING  HELD  FOR  PROSE- 
CUTION, TRAFFIC  VIOLATIONS,  EXCEPT  DRIVING  WHILE  IN- 
TOXICATED, 1952;  NUMBER  AND  RATE  PER  100,000  INHABITANTS, 
BY  POPULATION  GROUPS 

[Population  figures  from  1950  decennial  census] 


Offense  charged 

Total 

Group  I 

Group  II 

Group  III 

Group  IV 

Group  V 

Group  VI 

686  cities; 

total 
popula- 
tion, 

15,916,880 

8  cities 
over 

250,000; 

popula- 
tion, 

4,296,350 

8  cities, 
100,000  to 
250,000; 
popula- 
tion, 
1,324,623 

27  cities, 
50,000  to 
100,000; 
popula- 
tion, 
1,908,356 

82  cities, 
25,000  to 
50,000; 
popula- 
tion, 
2,850,465 

238  cities. 

10,000  to 
25,000; 

popula- 
tion, 

3,631,666 

323  cities 
under 
10,000; 

popula- 
tion, 

1,905,420 

ioad  and  driving  laws: 

Number    of    persons    re- 
leased   

Rate  per  100,000. .   

87.  912 
552.3 

847,  639 
5,  325.  4 

39,  853 
250.4 

12,  661 
294.7 

45,  161 
1. 051. 1 

17,  32H 

3,971 
299.8 

114,683 
8,  657. 8 

4.041 

3.254 
170.  5 

60,  820 
3,  187.  0 

1.860 
97.5 

36.811 
1.291.4 

217.602 
7,  633. 9 

5.750 
201.7 

16,234 
147. 0 

301.  200 
8.  293.  7 

5,680 
156.4 

14,  981 
786  2 

Parking  violations: 

Number    of    persons    re- 
leased  

Rate  per  100,000 

Dther  traffic  and  motor  vehicle 
laws: 
Number    of    persons    re- 

108, 173 
5,  677. 1 

5. 194 

Rate  per  100,000 

403.  3           305. 1 

272  6 

CLASSIFICATION  OF  OFFENSES 

The  police  statistics  herein  concern  local  offenses  only  and  in  no  manner  relate 
to  crimes  characterized  as  exclusively  Federal. 

The  term  "offenses  known  to  the  police"  is  designed  to  include  those  crimes 
designated  as  part  1  classes  of  the  uniform  classification  occurring  within  the  police 
jurisdiction,  whether  they  become  know^n  to  the  poHce  through  reports  of  police 
officers,  of  citizens,  of  prosecuting  or  court  officials,  or  otherwise.     They  are  con-i 
fined  to  the  following  group  of  seven  classes  of  grave  offenses,  shown  by  experiencflj 
to  be  those  most  generally  and  completely  reported  to  the  pohce:  Criminal  homi-|j: 
cide,  including  (a)  murder,  nonnegligent  manslaughter,  and  (6)  manslaughter  bj| 
negligence;  rape;  robbery;  aggravated  assault;  burglary — breaking  or  entering  I 
larceny — theft;  and  auto  theft.     The  figures  contained  herein  include  also  th<|, 
number  of  attempted  crimes  of  the  designated  classes.     In  other  words,  an  at-f 
tempted  burglary  or  robbery,  for  example,  is  reported  in  the  bulletin  in  the  sara< 
manner  as  if  the  crime  had  been  completed.     Attempted  murders,  however,  an 
reported  as  aggravated  assaults. 

"Offenses  known  to  the  police"  include,  therefore,  all  of  the  above  offenses 
including  attempts,  which  are  reported  by  the  lavA'-enforcement  agencies  of  con 
tributing  communities  and  not  merely  arrests  or  cleared  cases.  Offenses  commit 
ted  by  juveniles  are  included  in  the  same  manner  as  those  known  to  have  beei 
committed  by  adults,  regardless  of  the  prosecutive  action.  Complaints  whicJ 
upon  investigation  are  learned  to  be  groundless  are  not  included  in  the  tabulations 

In  publishing  the  data  sent  in  by  chiefs  of  police  in  different  cities,  the  FBI  doe 


not  vouch  for  their  accuracy.     They  are  given  out  as  current  information  whici 
may  throw  some  light  on  problems  of  crime  and  criminal-law  enforcement. 

In  compiling  the  tables,  returns  which  were  apparently  incomplete  or  other  wis  I 
defective  were  excluded. 

In  order  to  indicate  more  clearly  the  types  of  offenses  included  in  part  I  an 
part  II  offenses,  there  follows  a  brief  definition  of  each  classificaiton: 

Part  I  Offenses 

1.  Criminal  homicide. — (a)  Murder  and  nonnegligent  manslaughter  includes  a< 
willful  felonious  homicides  as  distinguished  from  deaths  caused  by  negligencf 
Does  not  include  attempts  to  kill,  assaults  to  kill,  suicides,  accidental  deaths,  c 
justifiable  homicides.  Justifiable  homicides  excluded  from  this  classification  ai 
limited  to  the  following  types  of  cases:  (1)  The  killing  of  a  felon  by  a  peace  ofFicf 
in  line  of  duty;  (2)  the  killing  of  a  hold-up  man  by  a  private  citizen,  (b)  Mai 
slaughter  by  negligence  includes  any  death  which  the  police  investigation  estal 
lishes  was  primarily  attributable  to  gross  negligence  on  the  part  of  some  individuj 
other  than  the  victim. 

2.  Rape. — Includes  forcible  rape,  statutory  rape  (no  force  used — victim  und« 
age  of  consent),  assault  to  rape,  and  attempted  rape. 

3.  Robbery. — Includes  stealing  or  taking  anything  of  value  from  the  person  b   " 
force  or  violence  or  by  putting  in  fear,  such  as  strong-arm  robbery,  stick-up 
robbery,  armed.     Includes  assault  to  rob  and  attempt  to  rob. 

4.  Aggravated  assaidt. — Includes  assault  with  intent  to  kill;  assault  by  shootinj 
cutting,  stabbing,  maiming,  poisoning,  scalding,  or  by  the  use  of  acids.  Does  n( 
include  simple  assault,  assault  and  battery,  fighting,  etc. 

5.  Burglary — breaking  or  entering. — Includes  burglary,  housebreaking,  safi 
cracking,  or  any  unlawful  entry  to  commit  a  felony  or  a  theft,  even  though  n 
force  was  used  to  gain  entrance.  Includes  attempts.  Burglary  followed  b 
larceny  is  included  in  this  classification  and  not  counted  again  as  larceny. 

6.  Larceny — theft  (except  auto  theft). —  (a)  Fifty  dollars  and  over  in  valu< 
(6)  under  $50  in  value — includes  in  one  of  the  above  subclassifications,  dependin 
upon  the  value  of  the  property  stolen,  thefts  of  bicycles,  automobile  accessorie 

(64) 


t 


65 

io])lifting,  pocket-picking,  or  any  stealing  of  property  or  article  of  value  which  is 
)t  taken  by  force  and  violence  or  by  fraud.  Does  not  include  embezzlement, 
;oii"  games,  forgery,  worthless  checks,  etc. 

7.  Auto  theft. — Includes  all  cases  where  a  motor  vehicle  is  stolen  or  driven  away 
id  abandoned,  including  the  so-called  joy-riding  thefts.  Does  not  include  taking 
r  temporary  use  when  actually  returned  by  the  taker,  or  unauthorized  use  by 
lO^e  having  lawful  access  to  the  vehicle. 

art  II  Offenses 

8.  Other  assaults. — Includes  all  assaults  and  attempted  assaults  ^\hich  are  not 
an  aggravated  nature  and  which  do  not  belong  in  class  4. 

9.  Forgery  and  counterfeiting. — Includes  offenses  dealing  with  the  making, 
toring,  uttering,  or  possessing,  with  intent  to  defraud,  anything  false  which  is 
ade  to  appear  true.     Includes  attempts. 

10.  EmhezzUment  and  fraud. — Includes  all  offenses  of  fraudulent  conversion, 
iilsezzlement,  and  obtaining  money  or  property  by  false  pretenses. 

11.  Stolen  property;  buying,  receiving,  possessing. — Includes  buying,  receiving, 
id  possessing  stolen  property  as  well  as  attempts  to  commit  any  of  those  offenses. 

12.  Weapons;  carrying,  posses.'^ing,  etc. — Includes  all  violations  of  regulations  or 
atutes  controlHng  the  carrying,  using,  possessing,  furnishing,  and  manufacturing 

deadly  weapons  or  silencers  and  all  attempts  to  violate  such  statutes  or  reg- 
ations. 

1.3.  Prostitution  and  comrnercialized  vice. — Includes  se.x  offenses  of  a  commer- 
alized  nature,  or  attempts  to  commit  the  same,  such  as  prostitution,  keeping 
n\  (ly  house,  procuring,  transporting,  or  detaining  women  for  immoral  purposes. 

14.  Sex  offenses  (except  rape  and  prostitution  and  commercialized  vice). — ■ 
icludes  offenses  against  chastity,  common  decency,  morals,  and  the  like.  In- 
udes  attempts. 

1.5.  Offenses  against  the  family  and  children. — Includes  offenses  of  nonsupport, 
'iilect,  desertion,  or  abuse  of  family  and  children. 

Hi.  Narcotic  drug  laws. — Includes  offenses  relating  to  narcotic  drugs,  such  as 
ilawful  possession,  sale,  or  use.     Excludes  Federal  offenses. 

17.  Liquor  laws. — With  the  exception  of  "drunkenness"  (class  18)  and  "driving 
hile  intoxicated"  (class  22),  liquor  law  violations,  state  or  local,  are  placed  in  this 
ass.     Excludes  Federal  violations. 

18.  Drunkenness. ^Includes  all  offenses  of  drunkenness  or  intoxication. 

19.  Disorderly  conduct. — Includes  all  charges  of  committing  a  breach  of  the 
?ace. 

20.  Vagrancy. — Includes  such  offenses  as  vagabondage,  begging,  loitering,  etc. 

21.  Gambling. — Includes  offenses  of  promoting,  permitting,  or  engaging  in 
unbUng. 

22.  Driving  while  intoxicated. — Includes  driving  or  operating  any  motor  vehicle 
hile  drunk  or  under  the  influence  of  liquor  or  narcotics. 

23.  Violation  of  road  and  driving  laws. — Includes  violations  of  regulations  with 
spect  to  the  proper  handling  of  a  motor  vehicle  to  prevent  accidents. 

24.  Parking  violations. — Includes  violations  of  parking  ordinances. 

2.5.  Other  violations  of  traffic  and  motor  vehicle  laws. — Includes  violations  of  state 
ws  and  municipal  ordinances  with  regard  to  traffic  and  motor  vehicles  not  other- 
ise  provided  for  in  classes  22-24. 

26.  All  other  offenses. — Includes  all  violations  of  state  or  local  laws  for  which 
)  provision  has  been  made  above  in  classes  1-25. 

27.  Suspicion. — This  classification  includes  all  persons  arrested  as  suspicious 
laracters,  but  not  in  connection  with  any  specific  offense,  who  are  released  with- 
it  formal  charges  being  placed  against  them. 

o 


UNIFORM 

CRIME 
REPORTS 


FOR  THE  UNITED  STATES 


ISSUED  BY  THE 

FEDERAL  BUREAU  OF  INVESTIGATION 

UNITED  STATES  DEPARTMENT  OF  JUSTICE 

WASHINGTON,  D.  C. 


Volume  XXiV 
ANNUAL  BULLETIN 


Number  2 
1953 


UNIFORM 
CRIME  REPORTS 

FOR  THE  UNITED  STATES 


Volume  XXiV — Number  2 
ANNUAL  BULLETIN,  1953 


Issued  by  the 

Federal  Bureau  of  Investigation 

United  States  Department  of  Justice 

Washington,  D.  C. 


ADVISORY 


International  Association  of  Cliiefs  of  Police 


UNITED  STATES 

GOVERNMENT  PRINTING  OFFICE 

WASHINGTON   :    1954 


Page 

Summary  of  volume  XXIV,  No.  2 07-68 

Crime  trends: 

Estimated  number  of  major  crimes  (table  24) 69-71 

Urban  crime  trends  (tables  25-27) 72-80 

Rural  crime  trends  (table  28) 80-82 

Monthly  variations  (table  29) 82-85 

Crime  rates: 

Urban  crime  rates  (tables  30-33) 86-91 

Rural  crime  rates  (table  34) 92-93 

Offenses  in  individual  areas: 

Offenses  in  cities  with  more  than  25,000  inhabitants  (table  35) 94-102 

Offenses  in  jurisdictions  outside  the  United  States  (table  36) 103 

Supplemental  crime  data: 

Offense  analysis  (table  37) 104-105 

Value  of  property  stolen  by  type  of  crime  (table  38) 106 

Value  of  property  stolen  and  value  of  property  recovered  (table  39)  _.       107 
Age,  sex,  and  race  of  persons  arrested: 

Age  distribution  of  persons  arrested  (tables  40-41) 108-112^ 

Sex  distribution  of  persons  arrested  (table  42) 113' 

Race  distribution  of  persons  arrested  (table  43) 114 

Reporting  area 115: 

Classification  of  offenses 1 16-1 18 

Index  to  volume  XXIV . 119-120 

(11) 


UNIFORM  CRIME  REPORTS 

J.  Edgar  Hoover,  Director,  Federal  Bureau  of  Investigation,  U.  S. 
Department  of  Justice,  Washington,  D.  C. 


Volume  XXIV  JANUARY  1954  Number  2 

SUMMARY 

Estimated  Number  of  Major  Crimes 

Major  crimes  reached  a  new  high  of  2,159,080  in  1953.  The 
3  percent  increase  over  the  previous  high  in  1952  was  supported  by 
increases  in  all  crime  classes  except  murder,  down  1.2  percent. 

Crime  is  outstripping  population  rate  of  growth  4  to  1.  Our  popu- 
lation increased  5  percent  and  crime  jumped  20  percent  since  1950. 

Robberies,  up  8.5  percent,  lead  the  increases  with  burglarv,  up 
S.2  percent,  second.  Larceny,  aggravated  assault  and  auto  theft 
increased  5.4,  5.3,  and  5.2  percent,  in  that  order.  Crimes  of  rape 
increased  3.8  percent  while  the  rise  in  negligent  manslaughter  was 
nominal,  up  0.7  percent. 

Over  400  million  dollars  was  lost  in  property  crimes.     Over  13,000 
stolen  autos  in  1953  worth  over  14  million  dollars  remained  unre- 
covered  at  the  year's  end. 
Crime  Trends,  Urban-Rural 

People  in  our  cities  were  victims  of  4.5  percent  more  major  crimes 
in  1953.  All  city  crimes  increased  but  murder,  down  2.2  percent. 
Increases  ranged  from  2.6  percent  for  rape  to  8.3  percent  for  robbery. 

City  crimes  in  1953  stood  39  percent  above  the  pre-World  War  II 
average  of  1937-39. 

Rural  crimes,  those  in  areas  outside  cities,  increased  9.6  percent 
with  increases  from  0.4  percent  in  murders  to  16.5  percent  for  burgla- 
ries.    Rural  negligent  manslaughters  were  down  5.5  percent. 

Monthly  Variations 

The  crime  calendar  shows  criminal  assaults  and  murders  at  their 
peak  in  the  warm  months.  Negligent  manslaughters,  predominantly 
traffic  deaths,  are  more  frequent  in  winter  months  when  bad  driving 
conditions  prevail.  Robbers  and  thieves  prefer  to  operate  during 
the  darker  months,  October-December. 

(67) 


68 

Property  Recovered 

Over  59  percent  of  the  value  of  stolen  property  was  recovered  i 
1953  and  88  percent  of  this  consisted  of  autos.  There  were  reco^ 
erics  of  over  11  percent  of  stolen  currency,  jewelr3^,  furs,  clothing,  an 
miscellaneous. 
Persons  Arrested 

Arrests  of  about  4  million  persons  in  cities  are  estimated  froj 
reports  of  1,174  cities  reporting  1,791,160  arrests  in  1953.  Arres^ 
include  driving  while  intoxicated  and  negligent  manslaughter  but  n« 
other  traffic  matters.  Every  other  person  (49.3  percent)  arrested  f<l 
burglary  was  under  18  years  of  age  and  1  out  of  3  was  not  yet  1 
Over  half  of  the  car  theft  arrests  were  juveniles  and  29.0  percent  we] 
not  old  enough  to  get  a  regular  driver's  permit  in  most  State 
Arrests  of  young  people  under  age  18  increased  7.9  percent  in  19^! 
while  adult  arrests  increased  1 .9  percent. 


CRIME  TRENDS 

Estimated  Number  of  Major  Crim.es 

Major  crimes  went  over  the  2  million  mark  again  in  1953 — 6  percent 
above  1952 — for  a  new  high  of  2,159,080  estimated  major  crimes  and 
the  rise  cannot  be  charged  to  an  increase  in  population  alone.  The 
number  of  persons  residing  in  the  United  States  increased  about  5 
percent  from  the  1950  census  to  1953  while  crime  totals  rose  over  20 
percent. 

All  but  1  crime  class  showed  increases  over  1952 — ranging  from 
negligent  manslaughter,  up  0.7  percent,  to  robbery,  up  8.5  percent. 
Murders  decreased  1.2  percent. 

With  criminal  homicides  grouped  (murders  and  negligent  man- 
slaughters) it  is  seen  that  killers  took  the  lives  of  12,810  people  in  1953, 
only  50  fewer  than  the  12,860  victims  the  year  before.  Murderers 
killed  7,120  of  the  12,810  victims,  while  the  remaining  5,690  died  as  a 
result  of  the  criminal  negligence  of  others. 

Strong-arm  thugs  and  criminals  armed  with  deadly  weapons  forcibly 
took  more  than  14  million  dollars  in  1953.  These  potential  killers 
threatened  their  victims  in  the  63,100  robberies  and  obtained  an 
..verage  of  $222  per  robbery.  Robberies  increased  8.5  percent,  the 
lighest  percent  increase  in  any  major  crime  in  1953. 

Rapes  numbered  17,900  in  1953  increasing  3.8  percent  over  the 
1952  figures  and  over  half  of  these  were  forcible  cases.  In  addition 
:.o  the  foregoing,  there  were  92,600  people  stabbed,  shot,  cut,  clubbed 
or  seriously  beaten  in  1953.  They  numbered  5.3  percent  more  than 
the  87,930  people  maimed,  crippled,  or  w^ounded  in  aggravated 
assaults  during  1952. 

Burglars  were  second  only  to  robbers  in  increased  activities  in  1953. 
Homes,  business  houses,  and  other  structures  were  illegally  entered 
479,120  times  (8.2  percent  more  frequently).  Burglars  took  more 
than  78  million  dollars  in  money  and  property.  The  loss  in  each 
burglary  was  $163,  on  the  average. 

Car  thieves  stole  226,530  automobiles— 11,220  more  than  in  1952— 
an  increase  of  5.2  percent.  Police  reported  the  value  of  the  average 
auto  stolen  as  $1,038  and  93.9  percent  of  the  stolen  autos  recovered. 
This  indicates  13,818  stolen  autos  unrecovered  in  1953,  or  an  unre- 
covered  loss  of  over  14  million  dollars  ($14,343,084). 

Other  thefts  numbered  1,267,020  in  1953,  a  5.4  percent  increase. 
Almost  29  percent  of  these  were  thefts  of  property  valued  at  $50 
and  over.  In  more  than  39  percent  of  the  theft  cases  accessories 
or  other  articles  were  stolen  from  autos,  when  the  cars  themselves 
were  not  stolen.  About  17  percent  were  bicycle  thefts.  Other  types 
of  thefts  included  in  the  larceny-theft  class  are:  pocket-picking; 
purse-snatching;  shoplifting;  and  miscellaneous. 

(69) 


70 


Over  400  million  dollars  was  lost  to  property  crimes   (robbery, 
burglary,  larceny,  and  auto  theft).    Police  figures  indicate  a  recovery' 
rate  of  about  59  percent,  with  autos  accounting  for  about  88  percent 
of  recovered  stolen  property. 

Table  24.— CRIME  TRENDS,  URBAN  AND  RURAL 

[Estimated  numVwr  of  major  crimes  in  the  United  States,  1952-53] 


Offense 


Number  of  offenses 


Change 


Number        Percent 


TOTAL 

Murder  and  nonnegligent  manslaughter 

M  anslaughter  by  negligence 

Rape 

Robbery 

Aggravated  assault. .- 

Burglary— breaking  or  entering 

Larceny— theft 

Autotheft 


2, 036,  510 


2, 159, 080 


+  122.570 


+6.01 


7,210 

5,650 

17, 240 

58,140 

87, 930 

442, 760 

1, 202, 270 

215,  310 


7,120 

5,6S0 

17,900 

63, 100 

92, 600 

479,  120 

1, 267, 020 

226,  530 


-90 

+40 

+660 

+4, 9<)0 

+4, 670 
+36, 360 
+64,  7.50 
+  11,220 


-1.2 
+0.7' 
+3.81 
+8.5 

+5.3 
+8.2 

+5.4 
+5.2 


Estimates  are  resorted  to  in  the  absence  of  complete  reporting: 
from  all  areas  in  the  United  States  in  order  to  present  an  approximate* 
picture  of  the  magnitude  of  the  crime  problem.  Estimated  crime- 
totals  are  limited  to  the  crimes  (offenses)  identified  in  table  24  above. 
These  are  the  Part  I  class  of  offenses  considered  of  major  importance 
in  the  police  problem.  The  uniform  crime  reporting  program  asi 
designed  by  the  International  Association  of  Chiefs  of  Police  is  further 
explained  beginning  on  page  116   (classification  of  offenses). 

Certain  important  crimes  are  not  included  in  the  estimated  total! 
crimes.  For  example,  the  program  has  no  provision  for  collecting) 
the  number  of  arsons,  sex  crimes  other  than  rape,  carrying  concealedl 
weapons,  and  embezzlement.  Accordingly,  the  estimated  totall 
major  crime  presented  here  is  considered  conservative. 

These  estimates  are  based  on  reports  representing  almost  60  percent 
of  the  rural  population  and  over  83  percent  of  the  urban  population. 
In  building  up  the  figures  to  100  percent  of  the  population,  it  is 
actually  necessary  to  estimate  for  only  slightly  more  than  one-fourth 
of  the  population  in  this  country.  In  connection  with  estimating' 
for  the  unrepresented  rural  area,  it  is  recognized  that  some  rural 
crime  reports  received  are  incomplete  and  adjustments  are  made  fori 
calculated  incompleteness  in  some  categories. 

It  will  be  noted  that  some  of  the  text  above  is  not  supported  by  the 
data  shosvn  in  table  24.    The  additional  approximations  were  obtainedl 
as  a  matter  of  interest  by  iipplying  to  the  estimated  crime  the  analyses ' 
of  crimes  by  type,  valuation  of  property,  and  recovery  percentages 
available  in  the  section  on  supplemental  crime  data  beginning  on 
page  104  of  this  bulletin. 


71 


CRIME  TREND- -U.  S. 

based  on  the  estimated  number  of  major  crimes 

1952  VS.  1953 -PERCENT  CHANGE 


+8.5 


+3.8 


+0.7 


+8.2 


+5.3 


tL*  +5.2 


1952  LEVEL 


1       r 


-1.2 


I        I       I        I       I 
I        I       I       I       I 


I       I 


I       I 


I        I 


I       I 


I       I 


I       I       i       i 


TOTAL       MURDER     NEGLIGENT      UK        ROBBERY    AGGRAVATED  BUR61ARY    URGENT    AUTO  THEFT 
MANSLAUGHTER  ASSAULT 


Figure  8. 


72 

Urban  Crime  Trends 

City  crime  went  up  again  in  1953.  People  in  our  cities  were  vic- 
tims of  4.5  percent  more  major  crimes  in  1953  than  in  1952.  However,; 
the  1953  figures  may  be  indicative  of  a  leveling  off  of  the  general 
increase  in  city  crimes  that  has  continued  since  1947. 

Since  the  last  general  decrease  in  city  crime  (1947)  percent  increases 
in  crimes  for  urban  places  (cities)  were  as  follows:  1948,  +0.3;  1949, 
+4.2;  1950,  +0.4;  1951,  +5.2;  1952,  +8.1;  and  1953,  +4.5. 

In  the  total  for  all  cities,  major  crimes  increased  in  all  categories 
during  1953  except  murder,  which  declined  2.2  percent.  Increases 
ranged  from  +2.6  percent  for  rape  up  to  +8.3  percent  for  robbery. 

All  individual  groups  of  cities  also  reflected  increases  (cities  placed 
into  six  groups  by  size).  A  high  for  1953  was  the  increase  of  6.9 
percent  in  the  group  of  cities  of  10,000  to  25,000  inhabitants.  The 
smallest  increase,  +2.4  percent,  occurred  in  the  group  of  cities  with 
100,000  to  250,000  inhabitants. 

For  urban  crime  trends  the  reports  for  2  years  from  identical  cities 
are  compared.  A  full  set  of  reports  for  1952  and  1953  from  the  police 
in  the  same  2,262  cities  were  used  in  the  trends.  Over  83  percent  oi 
the  urban  population  is  represented  by  these  cities. 

Generally,  under  the  uniform  crime  reporting  system  a  place  is 
urban  (city)  if  it  is  incorporated  and  has  2,500  or  more  people.  This 
broad  definition  follows  the  1940  Bureau  of  the  Census  distinct ior 
between  urban  and  rural.  The  1950  Bureau  of  the  Census  urban 
definition  includes  certain  densely  populated  areas  called  "urbanizec 
fringe"  areas  just  outside  of  city  limits  that  may  not  agree  with  police 
reporting  jurisdictions.  For  this  reason,  the  1940  definition  has  been 
retained  for  crime  reporting  purposes.  The  Bureau  of  the  Census 
has  pubhshed  1950  population  figures  under  both  the  "1950  rule"  and 
the  '4940  rule." 

A  city  police  chief  can  compare  his  own  figures  for  1952  and  1953 
and  note  the  trend  in  his  city,  increases  or  decreases  in  the  various 
crime  classes.  Then  he  can  check  his  local  trend  data  against  the 
national  figures  given  here  in  tables  25  and  26.  This  basic  survey  of 
trends  gives  direction  to  his  additional  studies  of  the  local  crime  prob- 
lem, such  as:  special  types  of  robberies  or  burglaries;  areas  in  his  city 
with  the  greatest  frequency  of  these  crimes;  time  of  day  that  they 
occur;  possible  rearrangement  of  patrol  to  combat  the  problem;  and 
the  like. 


73 

Table  25.— URBAN  CRIME  TRENDS,  1952-53,  BY  POPULATION  GROUPS 

[Oflenses  known  to  the  police  in  2,262  cities,  total  population  74,145,884,  based  on  1950  decennial  census] 


Population  group 


rOTAl: 

1952 

1953 

Percent  change 

iTOUp  I:  37  cities  over 
250,000;  total  popula- 
tion, 31,717,978; 

1952 

1953 

Percent  change 

3roup  II:  62  cities,  100,000 
to  250,000;  total  popu- 
lation, 9,124,665: 

1952 

1953 

Percent  change 

3roup  III:  124  cities, 
50,000  to  100,000;  total 
population,  8,759,964: 

1952 

1953 

Percent  change. 

3roup  IV:  230  cities, 
25,000  to  50,000;  total 
population,     8,111,918: 

1952 

1953 

Percent  change 

3roup  V:  636  cities,  10,000 
to  25,000;  total  pupu- 
lation,  9,827,137: 

1952 - 

1953 

Percent  change 

Group  VI:  1,173  cities 
under  10,000;  total  pop- 
ulation, 6,604,222: 

1952 

1953 --- 

Percent  change 


Total 


1, 257,  546 
1,  313,  596 

-1-4.5 


630, 043 
860,  781 

-h4.9 


176,  698 
180,  982 

+2.4 


141,  433 

147,  764 

-1-4.5 


124,  014 

128, 197 

-1-3.4 


124,  899 

133,  537 

-1-6.9 


60,  459 

62,  335 

-fS.l 


Murder 

and 
nonneg- 
ligent 
man- 
slaugh- 
ter 


8,593 
3.515 
-2.2 


1,962 
1,946 
-0.8 


554 

550 

-0.7 


345 
351 

-1-1.7 


277 
273 
-1.4 


288 

248 

-13.9 


167 

147 

-12.0 


Man- 
slaugh- 
ter by 


2,497 
2,656 

-1-6.4 


1,312 

1,552 
-1-18.3 


386 

347 

-10.1 


286 
274 

-4.2 


269 

239 

-11.2 


144 

148 

-1-2.8 


100 

96 

-4.0 


Rape 


8,585 
8,806 
+2.6 


5,589 
5,661 
+  1.3 


840 
1,006 

+  19.8 


663 
675 

+  1.8 


523 

539 

+3.1 


565 

528 
-6.5 


405 

397 

-2.0 


Rob- 
bery 


44,  504 

48,212 

+8.3 


32, 891 
35,750 

+8.7 


4,316 
4,869 
+12.8 


2,884 
2,969 
+2.9 


1,820 

1,878 
+.3.2 


1,648 
1,836 

+  11.4 


945 

910 

-3.7 


Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


59,  935 
62.  604 

+4.5 


37. 325 
39,  469 

+.5.7 


6,962 
7,435 
+6.8 


6,781 
6,894 
+  1.7 


3,730 
3,731 

(>) 


3,465 
3,355 
-3.2 


1,672 
1,720 
+2.9 


Bur- 
glary— 
break- 
ing or 
enter- 
ing 


289,  795 

305,  535 

+5.4 


152,267 

160,  807 

+5.6 


41,  750 

43,113 

+3.3 


30,  335 

31,  863 
+5.0 


25,  308 

27, 060 

+6.9 


26,002 

28,363 

+9.1 


14, 133 
14,  329 
+  1.4 


Lar- 
ceny— 
theft 


710,  562 

737. 190 

+3.7 


321,261 

331,034 

+3.0 


101,800 

103,  862 

+2.0 


85, 886 

90,212 

+5.0 


81,160 

83,  736 

+3.2 


82,  746 

88, 822 

+7.3 


37,  709 
39,  524 

+4.8 


Auto 
theft 


138, 075 
145, 078 

+5.1 


77,  436 

84,  562 

+9.2 


20, 090 

19,  800 

-1.4 


14,  253 
14,  526 
+1.9 


10, 927 

10,  741 

-1.7 


10, 041 
10,  237 
+2.0 


5,328 
5,212 
-2.2 


1  Increase  of  less  than  Mo  of  1  percent. 


293671°— 54- 


74 


Figure  9. 


75 


TvBLE  26.— URBAN  CRIME  TRENDS,  1952-53,  BY  GEOGRAPHIC  DIVI- 
SIONS AND  STATES 


[OfTenses  known  to  the  police  in  2,262  cities,  total  population,  74,145,884 

,  based  on  1950  decennial  census] 

Divisions  and  States 

Total 

Murder 

and 
n  on  neg- 
ligent 
man- 
slaugh- 
ter 

Man- 
slaugh- 
ter by 
negli- 
gence 

Rape 

Rob- 
bery 

Aggra- 
vated 
assault 

Bur- 
glary— 
break- 
ing or 
?ntering 

Lar- 
ceny- 
theft 

Auto 
theft 

TOTAL: 

1952          

1, 257,  546 
1, 313,  596 

+4.5 

3,593 
3,515 
-2.2 

■  2,497 
2,656 

+6.4 

8,585 
8,806 
+2.6 

44,  504 

48,  212 

+8.3 

59, 935 
62,  604 

+4.5 

289,  795 

305,  535 

+  5.4 

710,  562 
737, 190 

+3.7 

138,  075 

1963      

146,  078 

Percent  change 

New  England,  173  cities; 
population,     6,107,550: 

1952 

1953                 

+  5.1 

60, 994 

62, 754 

+2.9 

65 

84 

+29.2 

21 
21 

3 

5 

28 
50 

■+  7  >;.  L- 

1 

7 

7 

1 

631 

518 

-2.4 

203 

213 

+4-9 

312 

314 

+0.6 

791 
905 

+14- i 

762 

917 

+20.3 

U,  854 

15, 356 

+3.4 

36,957 

37, 924 

+2.6 

7, 050 
7,041 

Percent  change 

Connecticut,    23    cities; 

population,  1,103,563: 
1         1952            

-0.1 

13, 070 
13, 635 

3,300 
3,066 

- "/.  I 

34, 134 
35,  547 

+  V.  ■ 

2,014 
2,118 

7,535 
7,492 

941 
896 

245,989 

252,  439 

+2.6 

40 
59 

2 
5 

138 
131 

4 
6 

18 
11 

1 
1 

603 

704 

+16.7 

49 
59 

17 
18 
i.  •■ 

194 

178 

» ?:.  •'- 

8 
11 

36 
41 

8 
7 

1,886 
1,877 
-0.5 

171 
193 

32 
30 

-  ••',  X 

489 

587 

9 

'■J ' ',  ■ 

85 
83 

2 
3 

11,270 

11,561 

+2.6 

281 
361 

28 
22 

367 
418 
/  7,  -7 

"% 
10 

76 
106 

1 

11,469 

12,  481 

+8.8 

3,410 

3,718 

641 
599 

-  '-..< 

8,131 
8,421 

425 
506 

2,048 
1,936^ 

199 
176 

69,33.5 
71, 653 

+3.3 

7,830 

7, 951 
.'.  i 

2,297 
2,076 

-  7-4 

20,  342 
21,319 

V.  r 

1,452 
1,418 

4,371 
4,544 

665 
616 

126, 122 

127,  874 

+1-4 

1,268 

1953     

1,273 

Maine,  18  cities;  popula- 
tion, 317,802: 
1         1952                 .  

280 

i         1953 

Massachusetts,  92  cities; 
population,  3,729,795: 
1952         

311 

4, 445 

1953      

NewHampshire,  15cities; 
population,  264,306: 

99 

1953                     

157 

population,  592,322: 
1952      

894 

1953      

764 

Vermont,  9  cities;  popu- 
lation, 99,762: 

1952      

64 

1953    

93 

Middle      Atlantic,      525 
cities;    population, 
18,639,859: 
1952          

24, 773 

1953          

Percent  change 

New  Jersey,  136  cities; 
population,  3,271,268: 
1952        

+4.0 

38,  795 

39,  376 

177,  765 
182,  329 

29, 429 
30,  734 

288, 146 

296, 883 

+3.0 

83,  647 
82,  744 

35,  272 
37,036 

80 
89 

374 
364 

77 
65 

841 

812 

-3.4 

151 
126 

350 
497 

102 
81 

517 

546 

+5.6 

248 
245 

1,399 
1,392 

239 
240 

2, 336 
2,315 
-0.9 

1,010 
1,253 

9,214 
9,391 

1,046 
917 

13,093 
H,  887 
+13.7 

1,827 
1,816 

8,840 
9,846 

802 
819 

12, 923 
13, 589 
+5.2 

11,  731 
11,  444 

50, 121 
52,  672 

7,483 
7,5.37 

58, 282 

59,  409 

+1.9 

19, 127 
20,036 

92, 162 
91,  348 

14,  833 
16,  490 

169, 659 

173,  247 
+2.1 

4,621 

1953                   

4,367 

New    York,    169    cities; 
population,  11,665,437: 
1952      

15,  305 

1953                     .  

16,  819 

Pennsylvania,  220  cities; 
population,  3,703,154: 
1952 

4,847 

1953                   

East  North   Central,  552 
cities;      population, 
18,235,646: 
1952                 -  -  - 

SO,  495 

1953 - 

Percent  change 

Illinois,  143  cities;  popu- 
lation, 5,982,544: 
1952                        ---  - 

+5.2 

348 
340 

106 
79 

195 
196 

68 
64 

788 
703 

136 
169 

7,198 
7,915 

938 

5,228 
5,462 

977 

19,  505 
19, 612 

7,588 

39,  360 
38, 122 

21,643 

11,025 

1953               _ 

10,  394 

Indiana,  77  cities;  popu- 
lation, 1,988,123: 

1952             

3,816 

1953 

1,026  1        919 

8,285  1  22,457 

4,037 

76 

Table  26.— URBAN  CRIME  TRENDS,  1952-53,  BY  GEOGRAPHIC  DIVI- 
SIGNS  AND  STATES— Continued 


Divisions  and  States 


East  North  Central — Con. 
Michigan,  105  cities;  pop- 
ulation, 3,850,500: 

1952 

1953 

Ohio,  149  cities;  popula- 
tion, 4,629,078: 

1952 - 

1953- ---- --- 

Wisconsin,  78  cities;  pop- 
ulation, 1,785,401: 

1952 

1953 --- 

West  North  Central,  257 
cities;  population, 
6,075,413: 

1952 

1953 

Percent  change 


Iowa,  61   cities;   popula- 
tion, 1,079,341: 

1952 

1953 

Kansas,  49  cities;  popula- 
tion, 827,482: 

1952 

1953 

Minnesota,  64  cities;  pop- 
ulation, 1,460,248: 

1952 

1953 

Missouri,  35  cities;  popu- 
lation, 1,842,180: 

1952 

1953.... 

Nebraska,  24  cities;  popu- 
lation, 534,344: 

1952 __ 

19.53 

North  Dakota,  11  cities; 
population,  157,009: 

1952 

1953 

South  Dakota,  13  cities; 
population,  174,799: 

1952 

19.53 _ 

South  Atlantic,!  198  cities; 
population,  6,757,392: 

1952 

1953 _ 

Percent  change 


Delaware,  4  cities;  popu- 
lation, 124,845: 

1952 ., 

1953 

Florida,  35  cities;  popula- 
tion, 1,071,859: 

1952 

1953 

Georgia,  21  cities;  popula- 
tion, 550,781: 

19,52 

19.53 -. 

Maryland,  16  cities;  pop- 
ulation, 1,138,506: 

1952 

1953 


Total 


82.003 
86,  953 


66,415 
67,  934 


20,  809 
22,  216 


91, 650 

96, 8i7 

+5.7 


12,511 
13,408 


14, 405 
14,  935 


19, 155 
21. 155 


33, 960 
35, 870 


7,440 
7,546 


1,781 
1,995 


2,398 
1,938 

H6, 798 

152, 828 

+4-1 


2,753 
2,791 


26, 456 
29, 094 


8,453 
9,457 


23, 256 
27,  818 


Murder 

and 
nonneg- 
llgent 
man- 
slaugh- 
ter 


150 
174 


201 
199 


157 
137 


660 
+2.8 


103 
114 


71 


Man- 
slaugh- 
ter by 
negli- 
gence 


85 
117 


148 
137 


121 

157 


Rape 


976 
923 


326 

363 


110 
157 


575 

6i6 

+12.3 


324 
352 


Rob- 
bery 


2,714 
3,448 


2,042 
2,260 


201 
238 


2,788 
3,150 
+13.0 


+  11.1 


188 
262 


139 
158 


328 
348 


476 
533 


1,726 
1,966 


97 
120 


i,163 
+7.S 


Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


4,474 
4,836 


248 
329 


,650 
-1.1 


Bur- 

glary- 

break- 

ingor 

entering 


15,0.56 
15,  702 


13,564 
12,867 


2,569 
2,943 


19, 539 

20, 613 

+5.5 


563 
721 


165 
201 


812 
1,011 


82 
115 


358 
449 


127 
135 


2,955 
2,836 


151 
106 


16, 09  J, 
16, 192 
+0.6 


2,247 
2,508 


3,152 
3,447 


4,115 
4,542 


7,978 
8,112 


1,385 
1,320 


261 
332 


401 
352 


33, 82i 

35,017 

+3.5 


Lar- 
ceny— 
theft 


50,475 
51,804 


42,  328 
43, 965 


15,  853 
16,899 


55, 294 

58, 002 

+4.9 


1, 085 
1,333 


1,085 
1, 242 


1,  .596 
1,674 


718 
597 


7,247 
8,171 


2,349 
2,  593 


4,996 
5,937 


8,810 
9,506 


9,205 
9,339 


12, 328 
13, 403 


16,887 
17, 702 


4,911 
5,080 


1,357 
1,534 


1,796 
1,438 


73,  ess 

77, 595 
+5.S 


1,673 
1,762 


14,  775 
15, 714 


3,582 
4,103 


10, 203 
13, 331 


'Includes  the  District  of  Columbia. 


77 

'able  26.— urban  crime  TRENDS,  1952 
SIGNS  AND  STATES— 

-53,  BY  GEOGRAPHIC  DIVI- 
-Continued 

Divisions  and  States 

Total 

Murder 

and 
nonneg- 
ligent 
man- 
slaugh- 
ter 

Man- 
slaugh- 
ter by 
negli- 
gence 

Rape 

Rob- 
bery 

Aggra- 
vated 
assault 

Bur- 
glary— 
break- 
ing or 
entering 

Lar- 

cenv — 
theft 

-\uto 
theft 

uth  Atlantic— Con. 

orth  Carolina,  47  cities; 

population,  1,023,267: 

1952 

1953 

)Uth  Carolina,  20  cities; 

population,  398,367: 

1952 

1953 

irginia,  33  cities;  popula- 
tion, 1,197,639: 

1952 

1953 ..^ 

'est  Virginia,  21  cities; 

population,  449,950: 

1952 

1953 

ist    South    Central,    99 

cities;      population, 

3,076,292: 

1952- 

1953 

19,  862 
19,  262 

7,963 
8,633 

29, 084 
29,  119 

4,695 
4,578 

47.  757 

47, 995 

+0.5 

115 
114 

30 
35 

108 
139 

26 
27 

595 

578 

-S.8 

69 

57 

10 

7 

55 
63 

5 
3 

127 

104 

-18.1 

98 
93 

66 
45 

227 
194 

7 
18 

267 

205 

-21.0 

330 
284 

93 
90 

779 
770 

135 
123 

1,625 
1,521 
-6.4 

4,032 
3,  783 

547 
523 

2,896 
2,871 

232 
222 

5,409 
5,  775 
+10.7 

4,110 
4,193 

1, 756 
1,894 

6,110 
5,906 

1,147 
1,146 

15,  551 
15, 845 
+2.2 

9,276 
9,246 

4,688 
5,  253 

15,425 
16,004 

2,514 
2,494 

22,  010 

21, 929 

-0.4 

1,632 
1,492 

773 

786 

3,484 
3,172 

629 
645 

6, 585 
6,24'B 
-2.2 

Percent  change _- 

labama,  31  cities;  popu- 
lation, 963,560: 
1952__ 

13,  885 
14, 121 

15,957 
16,462 

3,666 
3,577 

14, 249 
13, 835 

100,  781 

107, 594 

+6.8 

133 
146 

71 
81 

46 
31 

143 
120 

612 

491 

-4.1 

22 
23 

42 
29 

16 
2 

47 
50 

201 

215 

+0.0 

65 
63 

127 
73 

38 
16 

27 
51 

697 

692 

-0.8 

325 
343 

758 
662 

68 
47 

474 
469 

2,197 
2,SU 
+6.7 

1,367 
1,258 

1,028 
1,092 

309 

284 

705 
1,141 

4,499 
4,251 
-5.5 

4,120 
4,461 

4,338 
4,243 

893 
1,121 

4,200 
4,018 

25,  866 

25,  921 

+8.6 

6,114 
6,220 

7,144 
7,680 

2,003 
1,809 

6,749 
6,220 

65, 760 

60, 057 

+7.7 

1,739 
1,607 

2,449 
2,602 

293 
267 

1,904 
1,766 

15, 149 

15,  746 

+4.6 

1953 

entucky,  32  cities;  pop- 
ulation, 752,071: 
1952 

1953 

[ississippi,     15     cities; 
population,  331,333: 
1952 

1953.. 

ennessee,  21  cities;  pop- 
ulation, 1,029,328: 
1952 

1953.... 

est  South  Central,  136 
cities;      population, 
4,911,873: 
1952 

1953 

Percent  change 

rkansas,  15  cities;  pop- 
ulation, 280,558: 
1952 

4,043 
4,564 

11,821 
12,  571 

15,988 
16,441 

68, 929 

74, 018 

48, 759 

60,  ges 

+4.5 

9,549 
9,841 

26 
29 

84 
75 

50 
47 

352 
340 

7^ 

76 

+6.6 

11 
6 

60 
57 

18 
29 

112 
121 

45 

56 

-16.5 

13 
16 

169 
179 

97 
73 

318 
324 

225 

247 

+9.8 

141 
114 

462 
450 

290 
296 

1,304 

1,484 

1,180 
1,186 
+0.5 

249 
255 

861 
833 

422 
311 

2,967 
2,852 

724 

716 

-1.1 

958 
1,202 

2,658 
2,563 

3,769 
3,767 

16, 481 
18, 389 

10, 559 
11,566 
+11.7 

2,314 

2,580 

.5, 372 
5,815 

9,574 
10,097 

38,500 
41,545 

51,216 

52, 288 

+5.4 

331 
362 

2,155 
2,599 

1,768 
1,821 

8,895 
8,963 

4,920 

1953.. 

ouisiana,  19  cities;  pop- 
ulation, 912,883: 
1952.... 

1953 

klahoma,  35  cities;  pop- 
ulation, 831,575: 
1952 

1953 

exas,  67  cities;  popula- 
tion, 2,886,857: 
1952.... 

1953 

.ountain,  106  cities;  pop- 
ulation, 1,931,118: 
1952 

1953 

Percent  change 

rizona,  11  cities;  popu- 
lation, 214,040: 
1952.... 

-2.5 

16 
14 

13 
4 

30 

41 

243 

267 

180 
162 

2,035 
2,254 

5,853 
5,946 

1,179 

1953 

1,153 

78 

Table  26.— URBAN  CRIME  TRENDS,  1952- 
SIONS  AND  STATES— 

53,  BY  GEOGRAPHIC  Div| 
Continued 

Divisions  and  States 

Total 

Murder 

and 
nonneg- 
ligent 
man- 
slaugh- 
ter 

Man- 
slaugh- 
ter by 
negli- 
gence 

Rape 

Rob- 
bery 

Aggra- 
vated 
assault 

Bur- 
glary— 
break- 
ing or 
entering 

Lar- 
ceny— 
theft 

i 

Auto 

theft 

Mountain — Con. 
Colorado,  27  cities:  pop 
ulation,  716,  559: 
1952                    

16, 409 
18, 002 

4,834 
4,971 

3,558 
3,449 

1,681 
1,674 

2,305 
2,608 

7,809 
7,917 

2,594 
2,460 

S20, 692 

2!i5,33It 

+8.t 

27 
39 

4 
4 

4 
3 

4 
2 

4 
3 

7 
10 

6 

1 

281 

290 

+1.0 

8 

3 
3 

2 
6 

i 

8 
2 

8 
13 

1 

Jti9 
Hi 

+6.0 

75 
103 

14 
25 

22 
19 

10 

2 

16 
18 

49 
27 

9 
12 

1,502 
1.618 
+7.7 

579 
595 

43 
41 

38 
41 

64 

57 

48 
52 

96 
86 

69 
47 

7, 679 
8.i95 
+10. 6 

275 
310 

62 

58 

30 
27 

17 
11 

55 
50 

67 
59 

38 
39 

6,365 
7, 033 
+10. 5 

4,117 
4,960 

819 
841 

564 
529 

421 
526 

585 
685 

1,464 
1,411 

3.54 
360 

46, 185 
52, 157 
+12.9 

9,769 
10, 450 

3,473 
3,687 

2, 579 
2,519 

1,025 
972 

1,190 
1, 389 

5,433 
5,525 

1,894 
1,800 

139, 881 

U8, 29/, 

+6.0 

1,59 

1953               _    

1,531 

Idaho,  21  cities;  popula- 
tion, 200,713: 

1952 

1953              -   

41 

:ti 

Montana,  14  cities;  pop- 
ulation, 168,723: 

1952             

:!i 

19.53                       .  -  - 

3C 

Nevada,  4  cities;  popula- 
tion, 49,651: 
1952 

Hi 

1953                     - 

1(1 

New  Mexico,  5  cities;  pop- 
ulation, 127,859: 

1952      

3d 

1953                          

4(' 

Utah,   13  cities;  popula- 
tion, 333,184: 

1952                      

<k> 

1953                 

7i 

Wyoming,  11  cities;  popu- 
lation, 120,389: 
1952                  

2: 

1953               

2i 

Pacific,  216  cities;  popu- 
lation, 8,410,741: 
1952                

24.  ; 

1953        

~~ .'' 

Percent  change 

+"' 

California,  154  cities;  pop- 
ulation, 6,596,251: 
1952                 

181, 4C2 
200,  623 

16,  035 
15,  289 

29,  255 
29, 422 

238 
231 

21 
14 

28 
45 

352 
386 

36 

28 

31 
30 

1,270 
1,416 

59 
67 

173 
135 

6,546 
7,427 

260 
301 

873 
767 

5,946 
6,631 

168 
201 

251 
201 

36,618 
42, 632 

3,  705 
3,  350 

5,862 
6,175 

110,  519 
119, 5,50 

10,  481 
10, 094 

18,881 
18,650 

19,9 

1953 

Oregon,  27  cities;  popula- 
tion, 655,443: 

1952            

22,3  . 

1,3 
1.2 

3,1; 

1953                        

Washington,  35  cities;  pop- 
ulation, 1,159,047: 
1952                         

1953                        

3,4., 

Long-term  trends  show  that  major  crimes  have  increased  ov( 
39  percent  in  our  larger  cities  since  the  1937-39  pre- World  War  1 
average.  Population  in  these  cities  increased  16.2  percent  betwee 
1940  and  1950.  No  exact  population  figures  are  available  for  195 
for  the  specific  cities  represented;  however,  as  a  matter  of  mteres 
the  projected  urban  growth  for  the  United  States  was  applied  to  tb 
cities  in  this  study  and  this  indicates  a  population  rise  of  aboi 
22  percent  (1940-1953). 

The  long-range  figures  presented  in  table  27  and  shown  graphicall 
in  figun^  10  are  based  on  the  reports  of  363  identical  cities  of  over  25,00 
hihabitants.  Their  1950  combined  population  was  47,586,584  an 
their  1940  population  was  40,951,490. 


79 


Figure  10. 


80 

Table  27.— URBAN  CRniE  TRENDS,  1937-53 

[Offenses  known  to  the  police  in  363  cities  with  over  25,000  inhabitants,  total  population  47,586,584  based  on 

1950  decennial  census] 


Year 

Total 

Murder, 
nonneg- 
ligent 
man- 
slaughter 

Man- 
slaughter 
by  negli- 
gence 

Rape 

Rob- 
bery 

Aggra- 
vated 
assault 

Bur- 
glary- 
breaking 
or  enter- 
ing 

Lar- 
ceny- 
theft 

Auto 
theft 

1937      

667, 140 
671.  707 
695.  992 
722, 324 

727,  665 
682, 233 
657, 059 
688, 350 

754, 386 
803, 995 
775,  948 
780, 094 

810,714 
810, 945 
858,  470 
901, 175 
943,455 

2,813 
2,416 
2,565 
2,519 

2,611 
2.671 
2.375 

2.485 

2,681 
3,051 
2.911 
2,915 

2, 662 
2,719 
2,645 
2,860 
2, 805 

2,241 
1,635 
1,437 
1,622 

2,  015 
1,844 
1,,')40 
1,  556 

1, 861 
1,872 
1,645 
1,634 

1,509 
1,773 
1,750 
1,902 
1,799 

3, 527 
3.431 
3. 671 
3,707 

4,051 
4, 4.59 
4,921 
5,208 

5,686 
5,874 
6,022 
5,995 

6,056 
5,926 
6,285 
6,303 
6,534 

30, 413 
31.088 
29,  217 
28, 097 

26, 930 
25. 622 
25,011 
24,129 

29,881 
34. 362 
33. 199 
31, 403 

33,315 
29,386 
29,497 
32, 893 
36,449 

21, 482 
21, 175 
21,. 541 
22,  529 

23, 832 
26,  756 
25, 359 
28,717 

31, 102 
34. 667 
37, 247 
39,  787 

41,278 
41,404 
40, 896 
46, 322 
48, 241 

149, 237 
149, 163 
155,  267 
157,  637 

151,276 
134.654 
137, 286 
141, 184 

166. 903 
183.  763 
179,  045 
181, 386 

190, 722 
187,016 
186, 067 
201.311 
212, 477 

356, 764 
375,  883 
399, 686 
422, 857 

426, 213 
404, 932 
367, 100 
366,391 

397, 514 
429, 513 
427,  794 
436,357 

456, 649 
4,58, 112 
491,970 
500, 354 
519, 633 

100,663 
86,  916 
82.608 
83.356 

90. 737 
81,295 
93.  467 
98,680 

118,758 
110,893 
88,085 
80,617 

78.  523  ! 
84,609 
99,  360 
109,  230 
116, 517 

1938                   

1939               

1940 

1941            -  

1942        

1943                   

1944               

1945                   

1946               

1947          - - 

1948 

1949          

1950 

1951              -  -  --- 

1952          

1953 

Rural  Crime  Trends 

Crimes  in  rural  areas  increased  9.6  percent  in  1953,  over  twice  the 
percentage  increase  noted  in  city  crime. 

The  1952  and  1953  reports  of  1,507  law-anforcement  agencies  cover-' 
ing  a  total  rural  population  of  36,658,117  were  compared  to  obtain 
these  rural  trend  figures.     In  the  individual  offense  classifications,  the 
only  decrease  seen  was  in  negligent  manslaughters,  down  5.5  percent. 
Increases  range  from  a  +0.4  percent  for  murder  to  a  +16.5  percent  i 
for  burglaries.     Increases  were  substantial  in  other  categories. 

Crime  in  rural  areas  (outside  the  limits  of  cities  and  towns)  has  in- 
creased each  year  since  the  publication  of  such  tabulations  began  with 
the  1944  annual  issue  of  this  bulletin.  Rural  crime  trend  figures  are 
summarized  for  the  United  States  as  a  whole  and  are  not  broken  down 
by  geographical  divisions  or  states.  This  presentation  of  the  rural 
crime  data  is  necessary  since  the  broad  coverage  available  for  cities 
has  not  been  obtained  for  rural  areas.  Reports  from  law-enforcement 
agencies  representing  rural  areas  are  coiitril)uted  on  a  voluntary  basis 
as  are  the  reports  from  city  police  departments. 


Figure  11. 


293671°— 54- 


82 


Table  28.— RURAL  CRIME  TRENDS,  1952-53 

[Based  on  reports  of  1,392  sheriffs,  104  rural  village  officers,  and  11  State  police;  total  rural  population 
36,658,117,  based  on  the  1950  decennial  census] 


Offense 


Number  of  offenses 


1952 


1953 


Percent 
change 


TOTAL. _ 

Murder  and  nonnegligent  manslaughter 

Manslaughter  by  negligence 

Rape --- 

Robbery 

Aggravated  assault 

Burglary — breaking  or  entering.. 

Larceny — theft 

Auto  theft 


207, 406 


227,814 


1,672 
2,114 
4,250 
6,258 

11,710 
64,134 
95,606 
21, 662 


1,679 
1,997 
4,480 
6,852 

12, 684 

74, 745 

102, 005 

22,  872 


+9.61 


+0.41 
-5.6- 

+5.4 
+9.5 

+8.3 

+16.5 

+6.7 

+5.6 


Monthly  Variations 

A  glance  at  the  calendar  tells  us  what  crimes  are  in  season.  Police 
tabulations  do  not  show  the  causes  of  crime,  but  they  do  reveal 
definite  seasonal  crime  patterns  when  examined  from  month-to-month. 
These  crime  seasons  have  varied  so  little  from  year-to-year  that  fairly; 
reliable  forecasts  can  be  made  for  the  current  year.  This  feature  is  of 
inestimable  value  to  the  alert  police  administrator. 

A  study  of  the  figures  by  quarters  of  the  3^ear  supports  the  following | 
general  observations:  Criminal  assaults  and  murders  occur  more 
frequently  during  July-September.  This  seems  to  establish  as  warm 
weather  crimes  all  but  one  of  the  offenses  against  the  person.  The 
one  exception  is  the  negligent  manslaughter  classification.  Crimes 
against  the  person  classifications  are:  (1)  murder  and  nonnegligent 
manslaughter;  (2)  manslaughter  by  negligence;  (3)  rape;  and  (4) 
aggravated  assaults. 

Traffic  killings  as  reflected  in  the  negligent  manslaughter  classifi- 
cation reflect  a  seasonal  pattern  opposite  that  of  other  crimes  against 
the  person.  Negligent  manslaughter  includes  such  negligent  killings 
as  the  negligent  shooting  of  a  hunter  mistaken  for  a  deer;  however, 
the  grossly  negligent  driver  in  an  auto  accident  accounts  for  most 
victims  counted  in  the  negligent  manslaughter  class.  Traffic  deaths 
classed  as  accidental  or  due  to  the  negligence  of  the  victim  are  not 
counted  as  oft"enses. 

The  first  and  last  quarters  of  the  year  are  high  in  the  frequency  of 
negligent  manslaughters.  These  are  the  darker  months  of  the  year 
and  darkness  and  generally  unfavorable  driving  conditions  prevailing 
in  the  colder  months  undoubtedly  contribute  to  the  rise  in  these  crimes. 
Detailed  studios  of  contributing  factors  in  traffic  fatalities  are  avail- 
able through  the  reporting  system  of  the  National  Safety  Council. 


83 


MONTHLY  VARIATIONS 
Offenses  Known  to  the  Police  ,  1953 

2,542  URBAN  POUCE  AGENCIES"  TOTAL  POPULATION  76,811,320 

(Offenses  Against  the  Person) 


Murder 


Negligent  Manslaughter 


Rape 


+  50% 

+  »o;5 
+  x% 
+  x% 

+  lOS 

I  ANNUAL 


->u*<<     -)    ->    < 


-JOS  — 

-MX  — 

-*o%  I— 

-SOX 


Aggravated  Assault 


^    "^     c£ 

£^  $  I 

u.     <     < 


i  §  §  ^ 

3    J   3    ij" 


Si 


84 


MONTHLY  VARIATIONS 
Offenses  Known  to  the  Police ,  1953 

2,542  URBAN  POUCE  AGENCIES  -  TOTAL  POPULATION  76,811,320 

(Offenses  Against  Property) 


Figure  13. 


85 


Robbery  and  thievery  are  high  for  the  months  October  through  De- 
cember. These  are  crimes  with  property  as  their  object  and  the  darker 
months  of  the  year  seem  generally  more  conducive  to  such  activity. 
Crimes  against  property  are  as  follows:  (1)  robbery;  (2)  burglary — 
breaking  or  entering;  (3)  larceny — theft;  and  (4)  auto  theft. 

Larceny  makes  the  least  clearly  defined  seasonal  picture  of  the 
crimes  plotted  by  month  on  the  graphs  in  figures  12  and  13.  A 
variety  of  criminal  activities  are  lumped  into  the  larceny  classification. 
A  study  of  larcenies  by  type  in  prior  ^^ears  has  shown  that  generally 
purse-snatching,  shoplifting,  and  thefts  from  autos  are  high  during 
October-March,  but  on  the  other  hand  bicycle  thefts  reach  their  low 
during  those  months.  Auto  accessory  thefts  reach  their  high  in  the 
early  months  of  the  year  and  fall  off  to  a  low  in  December.  Pocket- 
picking  steps  up  at  the  year's  end  but  is  low  in  the  first  few  months 
of  the  year. 

Table  29.— MONTHLY  VARIATIONS,  URBAN  COMMUNITIES,  1953 

[Daily  average,  offenses  known  to  the  police  in  2,542  cities,  total  population  76,811,320,  based  on  1950 decen- 
nial census! 


Criminal  homicide 

Rape 

Robbery 

Aggra- 
vated as- 
sault 

Bur- 
glary- 
breaking 
or  en- 
tering 

Lar- 
ceny- 
theft 

Month 

Murder, 
nonneg- 
ligent 
man- 
slaugh- 
ter 

Man- 
slaugh- 
ter by 
negli- 
gence 

Auto 
theft 

January-December. . 

10.2 

7.6 

24.7 

134.7 

178.0 

862.5 

2, 079. 4 

409.9 

January-M  arch 

April-June 

9.3 
10.1 
11.3 

9.9 

7.7 
7-4 
6.3 
8.9 

U.0 

26.9 
23.4 

137.  3 
Ul.l 
125. 1 
165.1 

1613 
180.4 
196.8 
170.1 

886.1 
798.  4 
837.3 
928.3 

1,969.2 
2,061.0 
2, 073.  8 
2,211.1 

iU.8 
393. 3 

July-September 

October-December. 

393.  7 
437.8 

January.  .      .  .  ... 

9.4 
9.4 
9.1 
9.9 

9.5 
U.O 
10.5 
12.7 

10.7 
9.7 

10.3 
9.5 

8.7 
6.8 
7.5 
7.6 

6.8 
7.8 
5.9 
6.8 

6.2 
7.7 
7.7 
11.1 

24.0 
24.0 
24.1 
23. 1 

24.4 
26.1 
27.5 
27.7 

25.4 
24.3 
22.8 
23.1 

147.6 
138.5 
126.0 
111.9 

112.2 
109.2 
114.9 
127.8 

132.8 
139.  6 
156.3 
198.9 

156.0 
164.4 
172.6 
170.7 

184.4 
185.9 
196.4 
203.7 

190.0 
179.2 
168.6 
162.5 

906.8 
881.3 
869.8 
831.8 

787.7 
776.0 
815.3 
858.4 

838. 1 

835.7 

938.7 

1,010.7 

1,873.4 
1,987.1 
2,  048.  7 
2, 073.  7 

2, 038.  3 
2,071.8 
2. 004.  0 
2, 107.  6 

2,111.0 
2,  227.  6 
2,211.3 
2, 194.  2 

426.9 

February _ 

41.5.4 

March . 

402.3 

April 

393.8 

May 

403.5 

June .  .  -  - 

382.3 

July 

374.6 

August 

393.8 

September.  .. 

413.4 

October 

436.3 

November  _.. 

447.8 

December.      . 

429.8 

CRIME  RATES 

Crime  rates,  the  number  of  crimes  per  100,000  people  in  the  general 
population,  provide  a  device  for  eliminating  differences  in  the  number 
of  inhabitants  in  various  areas.  They  are  presented  here  so  that  cer- 
tain studies  or  comparisons  might  be  possible.  Basically,  a  crime  rate 
is  determined  by  dividing  the  number  of  crimes  by  the  population  rep- 
resented and  multiplying  the  answer  by  100,000,  carrying  the  rate  out 
to  1  decimal  place.  Possibly  a  simpler  method  would  involve  adjust- 
ing the  raw  crime  figures  by  the  ratio  of  the  local  population  to  100,000. 
Thus,  a  city  of  25,000  with  80  burglaries  would  have  a  burglary  rate 
of  320.0  per  100,000  (100,000-^-25,000X80)  and  a  city  of  300,000  with 
750  auto  thefts  would  have  an  auto  theft  rate  of  250.0  (100,000-^ 
300,000X750). 

Before  any  use  is  made  of  crime  rates  it  would  be  well  to  review  the 
factors  which  affect  the  amount  of  crime  in  the  community  as  listed  in 
the  text  concerning  offenses  in  individual  areas  in  this  bulletin. 

Also,  it  should  be  noted  that  the  FBI  prepares  these  crime  rates  on 
the  basis  of  the  latest  available  decennial  census  figures  from  the 
Bureau  of  the  Census.  The  last  regular  census  for  the  United  States 
was  as  of  April  1,  1950.  The  Bureau  of  the  Census  from  time  to  time 
publishes  up-to-date  estimates  of  population.  These  estimates  are  for 
individual  states  and  the  country  as  a  whole.  However,  generally 
there  are  no  over-all  estimates  available  for  individual  cities. 

The  Bureau  of  the  Census  in  its  estimates  of  population  does  not 
attempt  to  delineate  between  urban  and  rural  population.  Under 
the  uniform  crime  reporting  system,  crime  figures  are  collected  sepa- 
rately for  urban  communities  (cities)  and  for  rural  conmiunities  and 
are  presented  separately  for  the  benefit  of  contributors  as  well  as  other! 
students  of  the  crime  problem. 

The  latest  estimates  of  population  by  individual  states  as  of  July  1, 
1953,  by  the  Bureau  of  the  Census  are  provisional,  but  they  show  that 
for  the  United  States  (urban  and  rural  combined)  the  population  since 
1950  increased  5.1  percent.  Thus,  it  will  be  observed  that  since  the 
crime  rate  tables  are  based  on  the  1950  population  it  may  be  desirable 
for  certain  purposes  to  make  adjustments  in  the  population  figures 
and  refigure  or  adjust  the  rates. 

(86) 


87 

Urban  Crime  Rates 

Urban  crime  rates  are  shown  for  the  following:  (1)  all  cities  together; 
(2)  each  of  the  city  groups  (cities  in  6  groups  by  size);  (3)  geographic 
divisions;  (4)  States;  and  (5)  each  of  the  city  groups  within  geographic 
divisions. 

As  in  the  past,  the  crime  rates  tend  to  show  that,  generally,  the 
larger  population  centers  have  more  crime  per  100,000  people  in  the 
general  population. 

In  the  absence  of  estimated  population  increases  for  all  cities,  the 
trend  in  urban  growth  reflected  in  the  decennial  censuses  of  1930,  1940, 
and  1950  was  projected  through  1953  and  the  percent  distribution  of 
urban  and  rural  population  thus  determined  was  applied  to  the  total 
estimated  United  States  population  as  of  July  1,  1953.  A  comparison 
of  this  projected  urban  population  with  the  known  urban  population 
as  of  April  1,  1950,  reflected  an  increase  of  about  5.2  percent.  For 
illustration  purposes  it  was  assumed  that  the  population  of  the  2,542 
cities  represented  in  the  urban  crime  rate  tables  had  increased  5.2 
percent.  The  1950  population  shown  in  the  tables  for  the  2,542  cities 
is  76,811,320.  This  was  increased  by  5.2  percent  and  the  crime  rates 
recalculated.  The  effect  of  the  increased  population  on  rates  is  shown 
in  the  following: 

Urban  Crime  Rates 


Murder  and  normegligent  manslaughter 

Negligent  manslaughter 

Rape 

Robbery.  _ 

Aggravated  assault 

Burglary — breaking  or  entering 

Larceny— theft 

Auto  theft 

It  is  obvious,  of  course,  the  increased  population  figure  gives  lower 
rates.  The  estimated  rates  are  4.9  percent  less  (before  rounding  off 
rates).  Accordingly,  it  is  highly  important  in  any  use  made  of  the 
crime  rate  figures  published  here  to  recognize  the  problem  of  shifts  in 
population  since  the  last  decennial  census. 


1950  popula- 
tion 

Estimated 

population 

(1953) 

4.8 

3.6 

11.7 

64.0 

4.6 
3.4 
11.2 
60.9 

84.6 
409.9 
988.1 
194.8 

80.4 
389.6 
939.3 
185.2 

88 

Table   30.— URBAN   CRIME  RATES,   1953,   BY  POPULATION   GROUPS 

[Offenses  known  to  the  police  and  rate  per  100,000  inhabitants.    Population  figures  based  on  1950 

decennial  census] 


Population  group 


TOTAL,  GROUPS  I-VI 

2,542    cities;    total    population, 
76,811,320: 
Number  of  offenses  known- 
Rate  per  100,000 


Criminal  homicide 


Murder, 
nonneg- 
ligent 
man- 
slaughter 


38  cities  over  250,000;  total  popu- 
lation, 32,149,292: 
Number  of  offenses  known.  _ 
Rate  per  100,000 


54  cities,  100,000  to  250,000;  total 
population,  9,460,149: 
Number  of  offenses  known  _  _ 
Bate  per  100,000 


126  cities,  50,000  to  100,000;  total 
population,  8,894,684: 
Number  of  offenses  known  _ . 
Rate  per  100,000 


237  cities,  25,000  to  50,000;  total 
population,  8,373,754: 
Number  of  offenses  known  _ . 
Rate  per  100,000 


667  cities,  10,000  to  25,000;  total 
population,  10,271,379: 
Number  of  offenses  known  _ 
Rate  per  100,000 


1,410  cities  under  10,000;   total 
population,  7,662,062: 
Number  of  oft'enses  known . . 
Rate  per  100,000 


3,707 
4.8 


2,020 
6.3 


581 
6.1 


361 
4.1 


290 
3.5 


277 
2.7 


178 
2.3 


Man- 
slaughter 
by  negli- 
gence 


Rape 


2,  782       9, 020 
3.8         11.7 


1,578 
4.9 


369 
3.9 


282 
3.2 


258 
3.1 


158 
1.5 


117 
1.5 


5,696 
17.7 


1,024 
10.8 


700 
7.9 


Rob- 
bery 


49, 171 
84.0 


552 
5.4 


494 
6.4 


36, 040 
112.1 


5,027 
53.1 


2,987 
33.6 


554       1, 974 
6.  6         23. 6 


Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


Bur- 
glary— 
break- 
ing or 
enter- 
ing 


64,981    314,828 
84.  6       409.  9 


1,934 
18.8 


1,209 
15.8 


40,453 
125.8 


7,707 
81.5 


6,988 
78.6 


3,939 
47.0 


3,  695 
36.0 


2,179 
28.4 


Lar- 
ceny- 
theft 


758, 991 
988.1 


163,027    336,730 
507.1    1,047.4 


32, 339 
363.6 


91,339 
1,026.9 


27, 882     86, 285 
333.0  ,1,030.4 


29,  865 
290.8 


16, 950 
221.2 


92, 085 
896.5 


45, 892 
599.0 


Auto 
theft 


149.  629 
194.8 


86, 373 

268.7 


44,765  ,106,660       20.382 
473.2  11,127.5         215.5 


14,656 

164.8 


11.154 
13:12 


10,  725 
104 


4.4 


^2.  7 


89 


Table  31.— URBAN  CRIME  RATES,  1953,  BY  GEOGRAPHIC  DIVISIONS 

AND  STATES 
I  Offenses  known  per  100,000  inhabitants.    Population  based  on  1950  decennial  census] 


Division  and  State 


TOTAL 
S'ew  England. 


Connecticut 

Maine 

Massachusetts. -. 
New  Hampshire- 
Rhode  Island 

Vermont 


ffiddle  Atlantic. 


New  Jersey 

New  York 

Pennsylvania.. 

!ast  North  Central. 


Illinois 

Indiana 

Michigan.. 

Ohio 

Wisconsin. 


Vest  Worth  Central. 


Iowa , 

Kansas 

Minnesota 

Missouri 

Nebraska 

North  Dakota. 
South  Dakota. 

louth  Atlantic  i 


Delaware 

Florida 

Georgia 

Maryland 

North  Carolina. 
South  Carolina. 

Virginia 

West  Virginia... 

iast  South  Central... 


Alabama 

Kentucky. . 
Mississippi. 
Tennessee.. 


ffest  South  Central. 


Arkansas. . 
Louisiana.. 
Oklahoma. 
Texas 


lountain. 


Arizona 

Colorado 

Idaho 

Montana 

Nevada 

New  Mexico. 

Utah 

Wyoming 


"acific. 


California 

Oregon 

Washington . 


Murder, 
nonneg- 
ligent 
man- 
slaughter 


4.8 


Robbery 


1.4 


1.8 
1.6 
1.3 
.4 
1.2 


2.7 
3.1 

1.7 

4.4 


5.6 
3.9 
4.5 
4.2 
1.1 

3.4 


1.1 
3.8 
1.1 
7.5 
1.9 


10.4 


3.1 
10.9 
15.5 

6.9 
11.3 

8.3 
11.6 

6.0 

12.2 


14.9 
10.7 
9.2 
11.6 


10.2 
8.3 

5.6 
11.4 

3.8 


6.7 
5.3 
2.0 
1.9 
3.5 
1.9 
3.1 


3.5 
2.1 
3.8 


14.7 


16.8 
9.4 

1.5.6 
3.4 

14.0 
2.9 

61.2 


38.1 
80.3 
24.1 

80.5 


130.6 
50.7 
88.4 
47.9 
13.2 

51.1 


14.7 

41.4 

35.8 

105. 0 

22.3 

8.1 

8.7 

60.5 


45.3 
65.7 
47.2 
88.3 
27.0 
23.2 
63.2 
27.4 

48.6 


35.0 
87.4 
14.2 
44.6 

47.2 


36.6 
51.8 
35.6 
50.2 

61.4 


114.6 
81.8 
20.1 
46.8 

110.0 
38.8 
25.5 
38.6 


110.8 
44.9 
65.3 


Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


14.9 


30.6 
6.9 

11.1 
3.8 

17.9 


54.6 
84.2 
22.2 


73.4 


90.0 
45.2 
123.9 
43.5 
18.3 

59.0 


10.5 
53.4 
9.0 
151.3 
19.9 
1.9 
6.0 

231.8 


17.7 
119.6 
223.5 
145.1 
364.  2 
131.7 
235.  0 

49.1 

121.2 


128.0 
144.2 
83.8 
110.2 

86.1 


97.9 
93.1 
39.2 
95.6 

39.4 


78.8 
42.8 
28.  5 
34.3 
28.4 
41.3 
18.0 
33.2 

82.2 


98.7 
30.6 
17.2 


Bur- 
glary- 
breaking 
or  en- 
tering 


409.9 


249.0 


318.1 
188.  5 
224.9 
191.4 
326.8 
175.6 

381.3 


346.8 
450.6 
203.6 

323.8 


325.4 
409.9 
405.1 
278.0 
164.7 

336.0 


228.8 
412.0 
309.1 
435.3 
246.9 
207.6 
205.  7 

514.3 


459.  9 
735. 0 
477.2 
517.6 
400.6 
452.  4 
493.  0 
254.4 

443.0 


454.1 
560.2 
332.1 
384.0 

515.2 


411.0 

278.5 
448.0 
618.0 

583.6 


978.7 
684.2 
418.5 
336.1 
1, 014.  7 
501.8 
421.0 
298.3 

617.2 


644.0 
505.3 
527.3 


Lar- 
ceny- 
theft 


615.8 


687.9 
653.2 
.570.  4 
536.5 
767.2 
611.7 

682.1 


607.9 

782.  5 
445. 7 

942.6 


631.2 

1, 107.  0 

1, 339.  8 

945.4 

940.9 

942.8 


865.6 
1,117.1 
904.4 
947.7 
946.3 
963.6 
839.5 

1, 129.  2 


1, 355.  2 
1,362.9 

958.  9 
1,165.3 

874.0 
1,210.2 
1,316.7 

551.1 

703.7 


639.  5 

1,014.0 

534.7 

595.0 

1, 193.  4 


852.0 

632.0 

1, 201.  0 

1, 402.  0 

1,  652. 1 


2, 601. 1 
1, 475. 1 
1, 822.  8 
1,481.2 
1,917.6 
1, 167.  7 
1, 633.  6 
1, 432. 6 

1,  755.  8 


1, 806.  0 
1, 524.  6 
1, 600. 3 


Auto 
theft 


194.8 


113.6 


108.  5 
97.9 

118.6 
59.4 

129.0 
90.7 

137.7 


131.9 
144.0 
123.7 

174.6 


172.4 
199.3 
257.4 
131.1 


169.2 


9.5.7 
144.7 
158. 3 
251.3 
165.9 
67.5 
72.6 

264.9 


259. 5 
254.3 
285.0 
477.2 
144.  5 
182.0 
255.0 
120.7 

199.7 


163.6 

343.  5 

79.1 

168.9 

270.1 


125.1 
281.6 
216.3 
298.2 

248.4 


500.6 
213.5 
154.7 
239.2 
221.7 
286.8 
229.0 
161.5 

318.4 


336.3 
185.6 
291.8 


>  Includes  the  report  of  the  District  of  Columbia. 
293671° — 54 — — 4 


90 


Table  32.— URBAN  CRIME  RATES,  1953,  BY  GEOGRAPHIC  DIVISIONS 
AND  POPULATION  GROUPS 

[Offenses  known  per  100,000  inhabitants.    Population  figures  based  on  1950  decennial  census] 


Division  and  group 


TOTAL 
New  England. 


Group  I 

Group  II 

Group  Ill- 
Group  IV_- 

Group  V 

Group  VL.. 

Middle  Atlantic. 


Group  I... 
Group  II.. 
Group  Ill- 
Group  IV_ 
Group  V... 
Group  VL 


East  North  Central. 


Group  I--- 
Group  II.. 
Group  III. 
Group  IV. 
Group  V... 
Group  VI. 


West  North  Central. 


Group  I 

Group  II  .- 
Group  III.. 
Group  IV.. 

Group  V 

Group  VI.. 

South  Atlantic  >. 


Group  I... 
Group  II.. 
Group  III. 
Group  IV- 
Group  V.-. 
Group  VI- 


East  South  Central. 


Group  I... 
Group  II.. 
Group  III. 
Group  IV_ 
Group  v.. 
Group  VI- 


West  South  Central- 


Group  I... 
Group  II-. 
Group  III. 
Group  IV. 
Group  V... 
Group  VI- 


Mountain. 


Group  I... 
Group  II-. 
Group  Ill- 
Group  IV. 
Group  V... 
Group  VI. 


Pacific. 


Group  I.-.. 
Group  II-. 
Group  III. 
Group  IV.. 
Group  V... 
Group  VI. 


Murder, 
nonnpR- 

ligent 

man- 
slaughter 


4.8 


1.4 


2.7 
1.4 
1.9 

.8 
.7 
.3 

2.8 


3.9 
2.1 
1.9 
l.fi 
.9 
.8 

4.4 


6.8 
5.2 
2.6 
1.8 
1.6 
1.3 

3.4 


6.3 
4.3 
.9 
1.0 
1.1 
1.0 

10.4 


10.1 
11.9 
10.8 
10.7 
10.3 
6.8 

12.2 


12.4 
17.0 
9.5 
10.7 
9.2 
9.4 

9.8 


15.6 
8.1 
6.9 

11.  1 
4.4 
2.6 

3.8 


4.2 
4.1 
3.2 
.9 
3.5 

3.4 


4.  1 
3.9 
2.2 
2.2 
2.5 
2.9 


Robbery 


64.0 


14.7 


31.8 
20.4 
11.4 
10.  5 
.5.0 
3.6 

61.2 


100.7 
24.9 
20.4 
13.3 
12.6 
7.0 

80.5 


138.  4 
64.4 
37.5 
24.6 
20.9 
14.7 

51.1 


101.9 
49.8 
22.0 
10.9 
13.1 
9.2 

60.5 


99.5 
85.1 
38.0 
28.2 
20.3 
23.9 

48.6 


79.4 
47.0 
48.2 
20.8 
2.3.4 
13.0 

47.2 


73.5 
56.  5 
29.6 
21.5 
13.0 
26.6 

61.4 


117.8 
76.  5 
59.3 
64.7 
16.8 
32.  9 

99.4 


136.  9 
89.5 
80.1 
49.5 
45.8 
30.8 


Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


84.6 


14.9 


30.4 

27.8 
7.6 
7.1 
3.2 
5.8 

66.2 


103.  5 
32.2 
36.7 
19.5 
16.4 
11.6 

73.4 


117.5 
76.0 
60.6 
23.  1 
18.1 
10.5 

59.0 


124.2 
58.  1 
27.1 
6.2 
8.5 
3.9 

231.8 


328.0 
214.6 
221.0 
178.5 
172.6 
140.4 

121.2 


142.3 
92.2 
182.9 
166.9 
91.4 
48.4 

86.1 


89.7 
94.4 
130.6 
99.9 
54.4 
46.5 

39.4 


62.  1 
41.2 
44.6 
42.1 
13.1 
32.5 

82.2 


129.2 
23.7 
40.2 
26.1 
28.5 
29.  1 


Bur- 
glary- 
breaking 

or 
entering 


409.9 


249.0 


142.6 
347.2 
262.2 
231.9 
207.1 
167.0 

381.3 


520.  6 
292.7 
267.  0 
244.3 
178.0 
140.2 

323.8 


370.  7 
430.2 
282.6 
286.2 
2.52.  9 
201.5 

338.0 


451.  2 
466.0 
296.3 
223.7 
248.2 
150.4 

514.3 


559.  5 
674.8 
488.7 
451.6 
407.9 
279.4 

443.0 


540.  9 
509.  4 
417.9 
323.0 
384.3 
215.  2 

515.2 


698.3 
576.8 
481.9 
420.5 
266.9 
216.6 

583.6 


841.8 
789.  1 
679.  2 
556.  5 
346.  9 
378.1 

617.2 


685.  2 
474.2 
591.4 
607.0 
558.5 
446.  1 


Lar- 
ceny- 
theft 


615.8 


571.8 
74.5.  7 
663.0 
573.4 
500.  0 
4.33.  8 

682.1 


803.4 
601.2 
581.5 
614.2 
.537.  3 
393.2 

942.6 


969.6 

1, 169.  2 

1,010.6 

1, 034.  2 

920.9 

492.0 

942.8 


1,048.1 

1,273.5 

1,153.3 

881.9 

845.2 

441.8 

1. 129.  2 


1,226.4 
1,33.5.8 
1,123.3 
1,215.0 
872.5 
582.5 

703.7 


820.3 
768.6 
826.3 
716.4 
535.  6 
292.9 

1, 193.  4 


1,347.0 
1,  536.  8 
1,  394.  0 
1,  0,59.  5 
783.1 
440.5 

1.  652.  1 


1, 449.  1 
2, 242.  3 
1, 693.  8 
2, 222.  5 
1,405.3 
1,215.5 

1,755.8 


1,633.1 
1,778.6 
1,972.9 
2, 054.  2 
1,990.3 
1, 568.  7 


1  Includes  the  report  of  the  District  of  Columbia. 


91 


Table  33.— NUMBER  OF  CITIES  IN  EACH  POPULATION  GROUP,  GEO- 
GRAPHIC DIVISION,  AND  STATE  REPRESENTED  IN  THE  URBAN 
CRIME  RATE  TABULATIONS  (TABLES  30-32) 


Total 

Population  group 

Division  and  State 

Over 
250,000 

100,000  to 
250,000 

50,000  to 
100,000 

25,000  to 
50,000 

10,000  to 
25,000 

Less  than 
10,000 

TOTAL: 

Population,    76,811,320 

2,542 

38 

64 

126 

237 

667 

1,410 

New  England : 

Population,  6,278,349 

180 

1 

11 

17 

32 

66 

53 

26 
18 
95 
15 
16 
10 

559 

4 

2 

1 

11 
1 
2 

11 
2 

13 
2 
3 
1 

44 

3 

6 

45 

5 

6 

1 

141 

41 
42 

58 

145 

6 

9 

Massachusetts 

New  Hampshire 

1 

6 

19 

7 

1 

4 

8 

Middle  Atlantic : 

Population,  18,963,375 

6 

11 

24 

333 

New  Jersey       

149 
173 
237 

615 

2 
3 

1 

8 

4 
4 
3 

10 

8 
6 
10 

31 

14 
16 
14 

63 

80 

102 

151 

East  North  Central: 

Population,  18,574,531 

358 

167 
88 
113 
165 
82 

283 

1 

1 
1 
4 

1 

5 

1 
4 
2 
3 

10 

4 
7 
6 
4 

9 

14 
9 
9 
19 
12 

18 

40 
18 
31 
41 
15 

72 

101 

52 

63 

Ohio                      

92 

50 

West  North  Central : 

Population,  6,202,919 

4 

175 

67 
53 
70 
40 
25 
12 
16 

246 

1 
2 

1 

4 

1 

7 
2 
3 
3 

10 
19 
15 
14 
7 
3 
4 

58 

45 

29 

2 
2 
1 

49 

2 

1 

19 

16 

2 

1 

27 

7 

1 
20 

10 

South  Atlantic : 

Population,  7,771,087 

3 

9 

129 

5 
1 
46 
30 
19 
56 
27 
40 
22 

109 

1 

4 

District  of  Columbia.-- 

1 

3 

1 

2 
3 

7 
4 
2 
5 
1 
5 
3 

11 

10 

7 
7 
16 
5 
9 
4 

27 

24 

1 

1 

14 

9 

1 

5 
3 
4 
3 

4 

29 

18 

3 

19 

12 

East  South  Central : 

Population,  3,138,618 

3 

5 

59 

36 
33 
16 
24 

162 

1 

1 

2 

1 
2 

1 

3 
2 
4 
2 

11 

9 
6 
5 

7 

54 

20 

22 

6 

1 
4 

3 

7 

11 

West  South  Central : 

Population,  5,178,011 

8 

78 

21 
23 
38 
80 

130 

1 

1 
2 
3 

2 

3 
2 
2 
4 

10 

5 
6 
16 
27 

21 

12 

1 

13 

18 

Texas                   

3 

1 

8 
3 

35 

Mountain : 

Population,  2,087,979 

93 

16 
30 
22 
17 
6 
9 
16 
14 

258 

1 

1 
1 
2 
3 

1 

14 

1 

1 

7 
6 
3 

20 

14 

11 

_  _ 

5 

1 
1 

8 

Utah 

1 

1 
1 

21 

1 

4 

83 

12 

9 

Pacific : 

Population,  8,616,451 

7 

5 

10 

132 

California              .  - 

186 
33 

5 

1 
1 

3 

10 

14 

66 

88 

Oregon 

Washington 

2  1               8 

22 

39 

2 



5 

9 

22 

92 


Rural  Crime  Rates 

Raw  crime  figures  for  rural  areas  are  shown  in  table  34.  Also  these 
crimes  in  terms  of  numbers  per  100,000  people  are  presented.  The 
reports  of  1,725  law-enforcement  agencies  representing  a  rural  popu- 
lation of  39,917,306  were  used. 

Crime  rates  for  rural  areas  are  presented  in  summary  form  for  the 
entu'e  United  States.  No  breakdown  by  geographic  division  or  State 
is  practicable.  The  coverage  of  crime  reporting  from  rural  areas  is  not 
as  broad  as  that  from  urban  centers. 

Obviously  incomplete  or  incorrect  reports  are  excluded  from  tables 
on  rural  crime  data.  However,  in-some  instances  it  appears  possible 
that  some  of  the  rural  reports  used  were  limited  to  arrest  data. 
Such  incompleteness  usually  exists  in  the  classifications  for  crimes 
against  property  where  proportionately  the  fewest  arrests  are  made. 
Along  with  this  it  should  be  noted  that  generally  rm-al  areas  have 
lower  crime  rates  than  cities. 

The  1950  decennial  population  figures  were  used  in  preparing  the 
rural  crime  rates.  As  observed  in  the  text  on  urban  crime  rates, 
current  shifts  in  population  should  be  recognized  in  any  attempt  to 
analyze  crime  rate  figures.  A  study  of  the  possible  effects  of  popu-  f 
lation  shifts  was  made  by  projection  as  outlined  in  the  urban  crime 
rate  text. 

Table  34.— RURAL  CRIME  RATES,  1953 

[Offenses  known  and  rate  per  100,000  inhabitants,  as  reported  by  1,573  sheriffs,  141  rural  village  officers, 
and  11  State  police;  total  rural  population  39,917,306,  based  on  1950  decennial  census] 


Offense 


Murder  and  nonnegligent  manslaughter 

Manslaughter  by  negligence 

Rape 

Robbery 

Aggravated  assault 

Burglary— breaking  or  entering 

Larceny — theft 

Autotheft 


Offenses  known 


Number  Rate 


1,910 
2,212 
5,006 
7,770 

14, 319 
82,  743 
112,463 
25, 049 


4.8 
5.5 
12.5 
19.5 

3.S.  9 

2M   7 
02.  S 


Based  on  the  July  1,  1953,  population  estimate  for  the  United  States, 
it  was  found  that  rural  population  had  increased  about  4.9  percent 
since  April  1,  1950.  This  projected  increase  for  rural  areas  was 
applied  to  the  population  represented  in  table  34  and  the  rural  rates 
recalculated.    The  two  sets  of  rural  crime  rates  follow: 


93 


Murder  and  nonnegligent  manslaughter. 

Manslaughter  by  negligence 

Rape 

Robbery 

Aggravated  assault _ 

Burglary— breaking  or  entering 

Larceny— theft 

Auto  theft 


Rural  Crini 

e  Rates 

1950 
population 

Estimated 

population 

(1953) 

4.8 
5.5 
12.5 
19.5 

4.6 
5.3 
12.0 
18.6 

35.9 
207.3 
281.7 

62.8 

34.2 
197.6 
268.6 

59.8 

The  1953  rural  crime  rates  obtained  by  the  1953  projected  popula- 
tion are  4.7  percent  less  in  each  class  (before  rounding  off  rates)  than 
the  1953  rural  crime  rates  based  on  the  1950  population  count. 


OFFENSES  IN  INDIVIDUAL  AREAS 

Offenses  in  Individual  Cities  With  More  Than  25,000  Inhabitants 

The  number  of  offenses  reported  as  having  been  committed  during 
the  period  of  January-December,  1953,  is  shown  in  table  35.  The 
compilation  includes  the  reports  received  from  police  departments  in 
cities  with  more  than  25,000  inhabitants.  Police  administrators  and 
other  interested  individuals  will  probably  find  it  desirable  to  compare 
the  crime  rates  of  their  cities  w^ith  the  average  rates  shown  in  tables 
30,  31,  and  32  of  this  publication.  Similarly,  the}^  w^ill  doubtless 
desire  to  make  comparisons  with  the  figures  for  their  communities 
for  prior  periods,  in  order  to  determine  whether  there  has  been  an 
increase  or  a  decrease  in  the  amount  of  crime  committed. 

Caution  should  be  exercised  in  comparing  crime  data  for  individual 
cities  because  the  differences  in  the  figures  may  be  due  to  a  variety 
of  factors.  Such  comparisons  are  not  necessarily  significant  even 
though  the  figures  for  individual  communities  are  converted  into 
terms  of  the  number  of  offenses  per  100,000  inhabitants. 

The  following  is  a  list  of  some  of  the  factors  which  affect  the  amount 
of  crime  in  the  community: 

Population  of  the  city  and  metropolitan  area  adjacent  thereto. 

The  composition  of  the  population  with  reference  particulary  to 
age,  sex,  and  race. 

The  economic  status  and  activities  of  the  population. 

Climate. 

Educational,  recreational,  and  religious  facilities. 

The  number  of  police  employees  per  unit  of  population. 

The  standards  governing  appointments  to  the  police  force. 

The  policies  of  the  prosecuting  officials  and  the  courts. 

The  attitude  of  the  public  toward  law-enforcement  problems. 

The  degree  of  efficiency  of  the  local  law-enforcement  agency. 

The  figures  presented  in  the  following  tabulation  are  those  reported 
by  the  individual  police  departments  in  the  cities  represented  without 
reducing  the  data  to  crime  rates  (number  of  offenses  per  100,000 
inhabitants). 

In  considering  the  volume  of  crime  committed  locally,  it  is  gen- 
erally more  important  to  determine  whether  the  figures  for  a  given 
community  show  increases  or  decreases  rather  than  to  ascertain 
whether  they  exceed  or  fall  short  of  those  for  some  other  individual 
community,  and  it  should  be  remembered  that  the  amount  of  crime 
committed  in  a  community  is  not  solely  chargeable  to  the  police 
but  is  rather  a  charge  against  the  entire  community. 

In  publishing  these  figures  the  FBI  acts  as  a  service  agency.  The 
figures  published  are  those  submitted  by  the  contributing  agencies. 

(94) 


95 

Table  35.— NUMBER  OF  OFFENSES  KNOWN  TO  THE  POLICE,   1953, 
CITIES  OVER  25,000  IN  POPULATION 


City 


Abilene,  Tex... 
Ahington,  Pa.. 

Akron,  Ohio 

Alameda,  Calif. 
Albany,  Qa 


Albany,  N.Y 

Albuquerque,  N.  Mex. 

Ale.xandria,  La.  

Alexandria,  Va 

Alhambra,  Calif 


Aliquippa,  Pa.. 
Allcntowm,  Pa. 
Alliance,  Ohio. 

Alton,  111 

Altoona,  Pa 


Amarillo,  Tex 

Amsterdam,  N.  Y. 

Anderson,  Ind 

Ann  Arbor,  Mich. 
Anniston,  Ala 


Appleton,  Wis... 
Arlington,  Mass. 

Ailington,  Va 

Asheville,  N.  C. 
Ashland,  Ky 


Athens,  Oa 

Atlanta,  Ga 

Atlantic  City,  N.  J. 

Anbnm,  N.  Y 

Augusta,  Oa 


Aurora,  111 

Austin,  Tex 

Bakersfield,  Calif. 

Baltimore,  Md 

Bangor,  Maine 


Barberton,  Ohio 

Baton  Rouge,  La 

Battle  Creek,  Mich. 

Bay  City,  Mich 

Bayonne,  N.  J 


Beaumont,  Tex 

Belleville,  111 

Belleville,  N.  J 

Bellingham,  Wash. 
Belmont,  Mass 


Beloit,  Wis 

Berkeley,  Calif. 

Berwyn,  111 

Bessemer,  Ala.. 
Bethlehem,  Pa. 


Beverly,  Mass 

Beverly  Hills,  Calif. 

Billings,  Mont 

Biloxi,  Miss 

Binghamton,  N.  Y.. 


Birmingham,  Ala. 
Bloomfield,  N.  J.. 
Bloomington,  111. . 
Bloomington,  Ind 
Boise,  Idaho 


Murder, 
nonnegli- 
gent  man- 
slaughter 


Robbery 


3 

4 

255 

19 


Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


290 
41 


155 
2 
13 
5 
4 


10 

1 

2(19 


26 

42 

116 

208 

10 


Bur- 
glary- 
breaking 
or  enter- 
ing 


145 

1,089 
88 
114 

219 
581 
139 
355 
273 


Larceny— theft 


$50  and 
over 


87 
60 
488 
53 
81 

95 
215 

51 
199 
163 


22  33  24 

Only  9  months  received 


Under 
$50 


6 
2 
15 

42 
1 

30 

6 

158 


104 
137 

325 
32 
145 
113 
141 

61 

57 
376 

228 


101 
81 
Onlv  1  month  received 


19 
30 
65 

201 
20 
65 

132 

57 

38 
22 
371 
195 


119 
2 

255 

15 

323 

19 

1,656 

1 

5 
78 
26 


63 

2,220 

581 

23 

177 

55 

595 

433 

5,416 

47 

43 
379 
150 
125 
157 

441 
53 
59 
80 
43 

64 
535 
92 


59 
74 
182 


38 

1,  715 

370 

42 

81 

73 

132 

287 

4,191 

36 

40 
180 
125 

51 
107 

161 
40 
22 
75 
24 

53 
209 
49 
32 
62 

47 

49 

305 


Only  9  months  received 
■  1      162 


340 
3 
2 
3 
6 


1,947 
89 
79 
86 
139 


879 
47 
82 
64 

126 


581 
88 
2,411 
509 
165 

440 
973 
212 
1,054 
509 

107 

195 
279 
321 

919 

58 
497 
289 
384 

601 
113 
847 
414 


82 
3,981 
471 
103 
196 

218 
1,984 

934 
7,200 

195 

190 
587 
641 
450 
300 

1,117 
148 
119 
122 
120 

340 

1,249 

119 

90 

241 

100 


577 

1,667 
114 
259 
264 
651 


96 


Table  35.— NUMBER  OF  OFFENSES   KNOWN  TO  THE  POLICE,   1953, 
CITIES  OVER  25,000  IN  POPULATION— Continued 


City 


Murder, 
nonnegli- 
gent  man- 
slaughter 


Boston,  Mass. 

Bremerton,  Wash 

Bridgeport,  Conn 

Bristol,  Conn 

Brockton,  Mass 

Brookline,  Mass 

Brownsville,  Tex 

Buffalo,  N.  Y 

Burbank,  Calif 

Burlington,  Iowa 

Burlington,  Vermont. 

Butte,  Mont... 

Cambridgp,  Mass 

Camden,  N.  J 

Canton,  Ohio 


Cedar  Rapids,  Iowa- 
Champaign,  111 

Charleston,  S.  C 

Charleston,  W.  Va... 
Charlotte,  N.  C 

Charlottesville,  Va.. 
Chattanooga,  Tenn. . 

Chelsea,  Mass 

Chester,  Pa 

Cheyenne,  Wyo 

Chicago,  111. — 

Chieopee,  Mass 

Cicero,  111 

Cincinnati,  Ohio 

Clarksburg,  W.  Va.. 


Cleveland,  Ohio. 

Cleveland  Heights,  Ohio. 

Clifton,  N.  J 

Clinton,  Iowa 

Colorado  Springs,  Colo... 


Columbia,  Mo... 
Columbia,  S.  C. 
Columbus,  Ga... 
Columbus,  Ohio. 
Compton,  Calif. . 


Concord,  N.  H 

Corpus  Christi,  Tex.. 
Council  Bluffs,  Iowa- 
Covington,  Ky 

Cranston,  R.  I 


Cumberland,  Md 

Cuyahoga  Falls,  Ohio. 

Dallas,  Tex 

Danville,  111.... 

Danville,  Va 


Davenport,  Iowa 

Dayton,  Ohio... 

Daytona  Beach,  Fla. 

Dearborn,  Mich 

Decatur,  111 


Denver,  Colo 

Des  Moines,  Iowa- 
Detroit,  Mich 

Dubuque,  Iowa 

Duluth,  Minn 


Durham,  N.  C 

East  Chicago,  Ind 

East  Cleveland,  Ohio. 
East  Hartford,  Conn.. 
East  Orange,  N.  J 


Robbery 


15 
2 
2 
1 

2 
1 
80 
1 
3 

1 
13 

1 
1 

28 

7 

130 


255 
4 
24 


5 

1 

101 

55 

1 

1 
60 
33 
68 
52 

4 

10 
47 
54 
30 

3 

72 

7 

37 

17 


62 

259 

2 

787 
11 
8 
4 
9 


13 
33 

256 


-Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


436 
15 


17 
124 


244 
3 
73 
3 


6 
22 

225 
22 


44 

5 

102 

27 

10 

2 

165 

94 
439 

24 

141 

4 

53 

15 


Bur- 
glary- 
breaking 
or  enter- 
ing 


1,143 
65 

624 
59 

213 

161 

209 

1,164 

347 

34 

98 
153 
220 
573 
348 

146 
104 

608 
277 
576 

56 
705 

48 
160 
109 


64 
96 
101 

4, 352         13,  279         10,  655 
No  reports  received 
65 
342 


Larceny— theft 


$50  and 
over 


1,786 
90 

390 
34 

128 

38 

65 

526 

339 

11 

84 
128 
1% 
264 
209 

134 

57 
352 
(') 


(') 


Under 
$50 


351 
1 


No  reports  received 
117 

54 
316 

14 


2 
283 


851 

2 

106 

12 
241 
Only  9  months  received 


22 

22 

24 

4 

490 

258 

65 

36 

2,841 

3,870 

1 

19 

6 

15 

445 

38 

12 

/ 

8 

2 

18 

23 

2,797 
530 

1. 155 
106 
439 

199 

441 

1,470 

1,112 

200 

332 
456 
289 
392 
838 

657 
171 

1,169 
927 

1,106 

187 

813 

64 

106 


10,  944 


225 

148 

303 

1,271 

1,257 

2,823 

87 

19 

63 

2,087 

1, 162 

11,122 

72 

26 

217 

87 

71 

219 

48 

40 

247 

174 

137 

615 

353 

380 

1,150 

34« 

232 

537 

1,869 

1,  592 

3,208 

650 

75 

1,017 

45 

38 

158 

839 

435 

1,  461 

84 

81 

389 

240 

139 

469 

97 

HI 

254 

53 

41 

120 

62 

43 

138 

4,832 

1,050 

10,012 

147 

56 

146 

185 

128 

311 

261 

204 

928 

747 

330 

1,719 

361 

283 

1,874 

237 

90 

463 

3,500 

1,561 

4,  464 

78(i 

466 

1,527 

9,131 

3,415 

22,  672 

85 

56 

255 

171 

200 

817 

261 

191 

451 

208 

228 

454 

104 

36 

242 

125 

62 

181 

353 

183 

402 

See  footnote  at  end  of  table. 


97 

Table  35.— NUMBER  OF  OFFENSES  KNOWN  TO  THE  POLICE, 
CITIES  OVER  25,000  IN  POPULATION— Continued 


1953, 


City 


Murder, 
nonnegli- 
gent  man- 
slaughter 


Robbery 


Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


Bur- 
glary- 
breaking 
or  enter- 
ing 


Larceny — theft 


$50  and 
over 


Under 
$50 


Auto 
theft 


Sast  Providence,  R.  I. 

5ast  St.  Louis,  111 

laston.  Pa 

lau  Claire,  Wis 

SI  Paso,  Tex 


'Elein,m 

'Elizabeth,  N.  J_ 
Elkhart,  Ind^.. 
Elmira,  N.  Y.__ 
Elyria,  Ohio 


Enid,  Okla..., 

Eric,  Pa 

Euclid,  Ohio., 
Eiiccne,  Ore.. 
Eviinston,  111. 


Evansville,  Ind__. 

Everett,  Mass 

Everett,  Wash.... 
Fairmont,  W.  Va. 
Full  River,  Mass. 


Farfio,  N.  D. 

Fayelteville,  N.  C. 

FiMiidale,  Mich 

Fitchburg,  Mass... 
Flint,  Mich 


Fund  du  Lac,  Wis 

Fi-rt  Dodge,  Iowa 

Fort  Lauderdale,  Fla. 

Fort  Smith,  Ark 

Foit  Wayne,  Ind 


Fort  Worth,  Te.t.... 
Framingham,  Mass. 

Fresno,  Cahf 

Oailsden,  Ala. 

Oaincsville,  Fla 


Galesburg,  01... 
Galveston,  Tex. 
Garfield,  N.J_.. 

Garv,  Ind 

r.leudale,  Calif. 


Gloucester,  Mass 

Grand  Forks,  N.  D... 
Grand  Rapids,  Mich. 

Granite  City,  111 

Great  Falls,  Mont.... 


Green  Bay,  Wis... 
Greensboro,  N.  C. 
iGreeiiville,  Miss._ 
Greenville,  S.  C... 
( ireenwich,  Conn. 


Ilackcnsack,  N.  J. 
Haiicrstown,  Md.. 

Hamilton,  N.  J 

Hamilton,  Ohio... 
Hammond,  Ind... 


Hampton,  Va 

Hamtramck,  Mich. 

Harrisburg,  Pa 

Hartford,  Conn 

Hattiesburg,  Miss.. 


Haverford,  Pa 

Haverhill,  Mass... 

Hazleton,  Pa 

Hempstead,  N.  Y. 
High  Point,  N.  O. 


3 
197 


42 
1 
2 
2 

1 

14 
3 
3 

25 

106 


2 
12 

5 
43 
11 

4 
156 


18 
14 
34 

200 

105 
8 
6 

5 

1 
197 
46 


1 

472 
5 
2 


124 
1 


282 


61 
335 

71 

56 

710 

62 
337 

85 
155 

91 

57 
330 

48 
113 
151 


120 
220 

26 
259 

81 
107 
138 
146 

779 

35 


No  reports  received 


312 
191 
364 


100  i        2,047  464 

Only  7  months  received 


.53 
120 
38 
26 
422 

21 
220 
68 
99 
69 

20 
122 

12 
230 
218 

422 

50 

127 

6 

187 

53 
62 
55 
100 
806 


226 

71 

309 


723 
105 
122 


416 
24 
70 


9  88  26 

No  reports  received 


1 
300 


33 
931 
513 


29 
6.52 
264 


Only  8  months  received 

55  35 

625  273 
143  21 
67      120 


1 

407 

8 

31 

4 

23 


4 
56 
12 

79 
28 
30 
126 
13 


92 
449 
110 

428 
53 

87 
153 
130 
241 
319 

324 
137 
370 
795 
113 


91 
33 
140 
141 


55 
259 

91 
233 

28 

72 

59 

133 

118 

429 

246 
150 
242 
551 
24 

57 
37 
17 
108 
61 


237 
399 

149 

1.50 

2,025 

144 
560 
108 
320 
164 


284 
488 
612 

1,341 

147 

627 

15 

562 

355 
588 
226 
341 
1,914 


508 
274 
939 

3,  708 

1,098 


126 
269 


87 
1,345 
1,  230 


306 

1,  8.32 

225 

252 

148 

498 
266 

487 
70 

155 
392 
312 

388 
869 

471 

265 

462 

1,202 

76 

139 
109 
61 
119 

180 


98 


Table  35.— NUMBER  OF  OFFENSES  KNOWN  TO  THE  POLICE 
CITIES  OVER  25,000  IN   POPULATION— Continued 


City 


Highland  Park,  Mich... 

Hoboken,  N.  J 

Holyoke,  Mass 

Honolulu  City,  Hawaii - 
Hot  Springs,  Ark  _  - 


Houston,  Tex 

Huntington,  W.  Va 

Huntington  Park,  Calif. 

Hutchinson,  Kans 

Independence,  Mo 


Indianapolis,  Ind.. 
Inglewood,  Calif. - 
Iowa  City,  Iowa... 
Irondequoit,  N.  Y. 
Irvington,  N.  J 


Ithaca,  N.  Y 

Jackson,  Mich 

Jackson,  Miss 

Jackson,  Term 

Jacksonville,  Fla. 


Jamestown,  N.  Y ... 
Jefferson  City,  Mo.. 

Jersey  City,  N.  J 

Johnson  City,  Term. 
Johnstown,  Pa 


Joilet,  111 

Joplin,  Mo 

Kalamazoo,  Mich.. 

Kankakee.  Ill 

Kannapolis,  N.  C. 

Kansas  City,  Kans. 
Kansas  City,  Mo. .. 

Kearny,  N.  J 

Kenosha,  Wis 

Key  West,  Fla 


Kingston,  N.  Y., 
Knoxville,  Tenn. 

Kokomo,  Ind 

La  Crosse,  Wis... 
La  Grange,  Ga... 


Lackawanna,  N.  Y. 

La  Fayette,  Ind 

Lafayette,  La 

Lake  Charles,  La.  . 
Lakeland,  Fla 


Lakewood,  Ohio 

Lancaster,  Pa 

Lansing,  Mich... 

Laredo,  Tex 

Laurel,  Miss 


Lawrence,  Mass. 

Lawton,  Okla 

Lebanon,  Pa 

Lewiston,  Maine. 
Lexington,  Ky... 


Lima,  Ohio. 

Lincoln,  Nebr 

Lincoln  Park,  Mich. 

Linden,  N.  J 

Little  Rock,  Ark 


Lockport,  N.  Y 

Long  Beach,  Calif 

Lorain,  Ohio 

Los  Angeles,  Calif 

Louisville,  Ky 

See  footnote  at  end  of  table. 


Murder, 
nonnegli- 
eent  man 
slaughter 


114 
4 
1 


Robbery 


4fi 

11 

8 

34 

in 

19 
34 


371 

44 

1 

3 

11 

1 
13 

15 

8 

169 

4 

2 

84 


Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


37 
63 
4 
S3 
40 

203 
114 
11 


317 
15 


3 
37 
59 

9 
111 


Bur- 
glary- 
breaking 
or  enter- 
ing 


213 

168 

104 

1,127 

100 

4,631 
229 
290 
157 
105 

2,176 

395 

31 

47 

280 

81 
Ififi 
344 
121 
1,572 

115 

29 

677 


Larceny— theft 


$50  and 
over 


89 
505 
49 

1,406 

137 

208 

14 

59 

1,675 

276 

32 

6 

99 

161 

87 

55 

1,123 

50 
20 

258 


Under 
$50 


12 

8 

13 

24 

21 

12 

3 

13 

2 

18 

98 

105 

89 

499 

457 

4 

1 

4 

3 

2 

1 

1 

10 

5 

22 

13 

13 

12 

35 

121 

8 

50 

195 

12 

2 

114 

6 

38 

82 

9 

18 

200 

6 

45 

132 

2 

2 

115 

14 

3 

131 

6 

22 

200 

No  reports  received 

1  57  26 

292  456  255 


70  251 

25  195  1 

No  reports  received 


96 


679 
129 
222 
2,788 
60 

5,066 
393 
522 
307 
227 

3,713 

593 

93 

114 

299 

282 
494 
544 
235 
2,365 

125 

75 

547 


Only  8  months  received 
113 


83 
256 
176 
55 
45 


594 

1,610 

72 

95 

No  reports  received 


5                74  36  113 

98  I            424  I  248  |  448 
No  reports  received 

58  36  844 

100  29  114 

99  41  73 

180  114  449 

No  reports  received 


95 

242 

89 

152 

197 

247 

185 

923 

16 

78 

33 

130 

308 

1,127 

,428 

2,830 

61 

132 

76 

307 

114 

148 

124 

178 

32 

336 

51 

401 

130 

805 

Ki 

247 

18 

84 

41 

359 

57 

381 

231 
618 


556 
1,067 


12 

6 

147 

67 

205 

77 

7 

601 

544 

1,206 

4 

4 

53 

12 

61 

341 

190 

2, 052 

(') 

3,620 

16 

29 

166 

116 

249 

2,956 

4,223 

13, 8,34 

13, 854 

21,  276 

494 

549 

2,543 

2,054 

2,500 

99 

Table  35.— NUMBER  OF  OFFENSES  KNOWN  TO  THE  POLICE,   1953, 
CITIES  OVER  25,000  IN  POPULATION— Continued 


City 


Lowell,  Mass 

Lower  Merion,  Pa_ 

Lubbock,  Tex 

Lynchburg,  Va 

Lynn,  Mass 


Ljmwood,  Calif 

Macon,  Ga 

Madison,  Wis 

Maiden,  Mass 

Manchester,  N.  H. 


Manitowoc,  Wis.. 
Mansfield,  Ohio.-. 
Maplewood,  N.  J. 

Marion,  Ind 

Marion,  Ohio 


Mason  City,  Iowa. 

Massillon,  Ohio 

May  wood.  111 

Mckeesport,  Pa... 

Medford,  Mass 


Melrose,  Mass... 
Memphis,  Term. 
Meriden,  Conn.. 
Meridian,  Miss.. 
Miami,  Fla 


Miami  Beach,  Fla... 
Michigan  City,  Ind. 
Middletown,  Conn.. 
Middletown,  Ohio.. 
Milwaukee,  Wis 


Minneapolis,  Minn. 

Mishawaka,  Ind 

Mobile,  Ala 

Moline,  111 

Monroe,  La 


Montclair,  N.  J 

Montgomery,  Ala 

Morgantown,  W.  Va.. 
Mount  Lebanon,  Pa_. 
Mount  Vernon,  N.  Y. 

Muncie,  Ind 

Muskegon,  Mich 

Muskogee,  Okla 

Nashua,  N.H 

Nashville,  Tenn 


New  Albany, Ind 

New  Bedford,  Mass... 
New  Britain,  Conn... 
New  Brunswick,  N.  J_ 
New  Castle,  Pa 

New  Haven,  Conn 

New  Kensington,  Pa.. 
New  London,  Conn... 

New  Orleans,  La 

New  Rochelle,  N.  Y.. 

New  York,  N.  Y 

Newark,  N.  J 

Newark,  Ohio 

Newburgh,  N.  Y 

Newport,  Ky 

Newport,  R.  I 

Newport  News,  Va 

Newton,  Mass 

Niagara  Falls,  N.  Y„. 
Norfolk,  Va 


Murder, 
nonnegli- 
gent  man- 
slaughter 


19 


Robbery 


38 


321 
31 


217 
3 
2 

349 

27 

7 

2 

8 

150 

356 


Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


664 

2 

104 

400 

17 

25 

2 

13 

292 

83 

9 

181 


Bur- 
glary- 
breaking 
or  enter- 
ing 


120 
113 
291 
54 
243 

132 

231 

146 

38 

56 

25 
125 
15 
40 
124 

38 
6 
31 
110 
47 

18 

761 

27 

99 

1,091 

758 
186 
32 
90 
1,679 

1,328 

72 

200 

64 

50 

91 
215 
27 
20 
112 

3      243      180 

35      225      186 

Only  10  months  received 


232 
247 
751 
153 

480 

205 
534 
209 


67 
194 
56 


27 
63 
54 
138 
103 

45 

1,412 

128 

150 

2,523 

487 
101 
37 
148 
992 

2,384 

76 

922 

108 

126 

52 

499 

35 

12 

126 


Larceny— theft 


$50  and 
over 


Under 
$50 


1 

117 

101 

5 

1 

21 

14 

6 

15 

9 

6 

14 

4 

33 

39 

1 

8 

4 

9 

380 

533 

6 

31 

890 

9,028 

628 

786 

1 

5 

8 

12 

5 

9 

10 

11 

61 

4 

6 

26 

92 

358 

1,313 

103 

35 

841 

568 

52 

64 

346 

256 

152 

142 

123 

34 

84 

67 

609 

306 

28 

33 

129 

57 

1,617 

1,188 

133 

125 

44,  948 

40, 339 

3,270 

1,276 

122 

92 

85 

86 

94 

79 

88 

67 

309 

379 

314 

171 

162 

211 

1,745 

1,391 

297 
307 
1,181 
332 
753 

280 
637 
750 
215 
302 

234 
415 
23 
292 
341 

180 
267 
115 
305 
252 

85 

1,090 

111 

245 

2,437 

760 
446 
108 
384 
4,597 

4,001 
199 
834 
292 
289 

192 

630 

70 

31 

167 

719 
441 

158 
1,160 

280 
965 
268 
319 
170 

881 

49 

196 

2,427 

156 

29,  523 

3,228 

396 

197 

159 

331 

820 

553 

316 

2,263 


100 

Table  35.— NUMBER  OF  OFFENSES  KNOWN  TO  THE  POLICE,   1953, 
CITIES  OVER  25,000  IN  POPULATION— Continued 


City 


Murder, 
nonnegli- 
gent  man- 
slaughter 


Robbery 


Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


Bur- 
glary- 
breaking 
or  enter- 
ing 


Larceny — theft 


$50  and 
over 


Under 
$50 


Norman,  Okla 

Norristown,  Pa 

North  Bergen,  N.J 

North  Little  Rock,  Ark. 
Northampton,  Mass 


Norwalk,  Conn. 
Norwich,  Conn. 
Norwood,  Ohio- 

Nutley,  N.  J 

Oak  Park,  111... 


Oak  Ridge,  Term 

Oakland,  Calif 

Odessa,  Tex 

Ogden,  Utah.. _ 

Oklahoma  City,  Okla. 


Omaha,  Nebr... 

Orange,  N.  J 

Orlando,  Fla 

Oshkosh,  Wis... 
Ottumwa,  Iowa. 


Owensboro,  Ky 

Paducah,  Ky 

Palo  Alto,  Calif 

Panama  City,  Fla 

Parkersburg,  W.  Va. 


Parma,  Ohio 

Pasadena,  Calif.. 

Passaic,  N.  J 

Paterson,  N.  J... 
Pawtucket,  R.  I. 


Pensacola,  Fla. 

Peoria,  111 

Perth  Amboy,  N.  J. 

Petersburg,  Va 

Philadelphia,  Pa 


Phoenix,  Ariz... 
Pine  Bluff,  Ark. 
Pittsburgh,  Pa.- 
Pittsfield,  Mass. 
Plainfleld,  N.  J. 


Pocatello,  Idaho 

Pomona,  Calif 

Pontiac,  Mich 

Port  .\rthnr,  Tex 

Port  Huron,  Mich... 

Portlnnd,  Maine 

Portland,  Oreg 

Portsmouth,  Ohio 

Portsmouth,  Va 

Poughkeepsie,  N.  Y. 

Providence,  R.  I 

Provo,  Utah... 

Pueblo,  Colo 

Qutncy,  111 

Quinoy,  Mass 


Racine,  Wis 

Raleigh,  N.  C... 

Rapid  City,  S.  Dak... 

Readmg,  Pa 

Redondo  Beach,  Calif. 

Redwood  City,  Calif.. 
Reno,  Nev 

Revere,  Mass ... 

Richmond,  Calif.. 

Richmond,  Ind 


See  footnote  at  end  of  table. 


Only  8  months  received 
3  1  7  I  66  I  39 

No  reports  received 
No  reports  received 


Only  6  months  received 


Only  3  months  received 


248 
1 
5 


525 
117 
53 


293 
43 


5 

1 

3 
2 

2 

6 
60 

31 

U 

25 

61 

109 

10 

1 

18 

96 

104 

88 

9 

21 

36 

156 

2,266 

1,216 

167 

94 

12 

58 

463 

258 

1 

2 

6 

6 

11 

19 

24 

6 

40 

80 

6 

25 

1 

12 

10 

8 

260 

173 

59 

15 

49 

339 

5 

28 

54 

88 

1 
61 

26 

4 

1 

7 

5 

14 

5 

22 

286 

3 

1 

28 

9 

35 

9 

10 

8 

52 

6 

22 

2 

72 

82 

18 

8 

25  I  151  91 

Only  9  months  received 

85 

68 

75 


75 
550 
162 
574 
225 

222 

703 

60 

129 

9,847 

1,420 
268 

2,295 
119 
119 

112 

271 

297 

45 

87 

214 

2,331 

218 

419 

155 

1,287 

88 

619 

233 

196 

145 

289 

64 

212 

286 

107 
435 
169 
526 
105 


90  I 


20 

51 

72 

4 

23 

149 

98 

207 

6 

6 

50 

38 

71 

3 

1 

92 

35 

114 

28 

111 

76 

218 

1 

36 

20 

22 

94 

628 

334 

2,870 

528 

6,976 

7 

9 

127 

105 

659 

23 

29 

278 

230 

1,127 

135 

105 

1,689 

1,269 

2,859 

82 

74 

746 

258 

1,841 

597 
671 
184 


142 

405 

73 

99 

112 

164 

35 

130 

421 

1,414 

75 

154 

57 

646 

111 

425 

103 

571 

185 

1,089 

81 

153 

126 

459 

(2) 

560 

2,856 

100 

162 

1,215 

1,025 

05 

206 

103 

361 

116 

431 

165 

626 

151 

632 

32 

228 

44 

442 

142 

617 

1,683 

4,106 

150 

410 

298 

762 

<Xi 

310 

621 

1,734 

43 

47.T 

308 

8.33 

83 

314 

99 

373 

92 

732 

144 

571 

50 

205 

120 

574 

60 

312 

110 

468 

340 

435 

81 

179 

208 

2,230 

117 

140 

101 

Table  35.— NUMBER  OF  OFFENSES  KNOWN  TO  THE  POLICE,  1953, 
CITIES  OVER  25,000  IN  POPULATION— Continued 


City 


Richmond,  Va.-. 
Riverside,  Calif.. 

Roanoke,  Va 

Rochester,  Minn. 
Rocliester,  N.  Y. 


Rock  Island,  111 

Rockford,  111 .. 

Rocky  Mount,  N.  O. 

Rome,  Ga 

Rome,  N.  Y 


Roswell,  N.  Mex-. 
Royal  Oak,  Mich. 
5acramento,  Calif. 

-^asinaw,  Mich 

t.  Cloud,  Minn.. 


-^t.  Joseph,  Mo 

■it.  Louis,  Mo 

it.  Paul,  Minn 

?t.  Petersburg,  Fla. 
Ui'in,  Mass 


3alem,  Oreg 

5alina,  Kansas 

Salt  Lake  City,  Utah. 

?an  Angelo,  Tex 

San  Antonio,  Tex 


?an  Bernardino,  Calif- 
San  Diego,  Calif 

San  Francisco,  Calif 

^an  Jose,  Calif 

San  Leandro,  Calif 


San  Mateo,  Calif 

Sandusky,  Ohio 

Santa  Ana,  Calif 

Santa  Barbara,  Calif. 

Santa  Fe,  N.  Mex 


Santa  Monica,  Calif- 
Savannah,  Ga 

Schenectady,  N.  Y... 

Scranton,  Pa 

Seattle,  Wash 


Shaker  Heights,  Ohio. 

Sharon,  Pa 

Sheboygan,  Wis 

Shreveport,  La 

^ioux  City,  Iowa 


5ioux  Falls,  S.  Dak. 

5omerville,  Mass 

5outh  Bend,  Ind 

5outh  Gate,  Calif.. - 
■ipartanburg,  S.  C--. 


3pokane,  Wash... 

Springfield,  111 

Springfield,  Mass. 
Springfield,  Mo... 
Springfield,  Ohio.. 


Stamford,  Conn 

Steubenville,  Ohio. 

Stockton,  Calif 

Stratford,  Conn 

Superior,  Wis 


Syracuse,  N.  Y.. 
Facoma,  Wash... 
Tallahassee,  Fla. 

Tampa,  Fla 

Taunton,  Mass.. 


Murder, 
nonnegli- 
gent  man- 
slaughter 


Robbery 


28 


144 
14 
16 
2 

GO 

21 
18 
2 
4 
3 


10 

258 

29 


Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


5 

1,378 

129 

20 


4 

6 

54 

5 

238 

77 

273 

,289 

44 

10 

6 

1 

14 

10 


70 


13 

4 

491 


22 

17 

137 


52 
138 

7 
144 

2 


270 

28 

53 

2 


Bur- 
glary- 
breaking 
or  enter- 
ing 


1,  092 
212 

318 

67 

831 

137 
263 

75 
90 
48 


Larceny— theft 


$50  and 
over 


941 
220 
195 
52 
491 

141 
172 

75 
62 
53 


Only  2  months  received 


2 

74 

159 


174 

789 

265 

28 

249 
4,854 
1,223 

505 


28 
2,325 

38 

18 
Only  11  months  received 


43 

1, 052 

155 

34 

76 

1,843 

485 

306 


1 

7 

25 

18 

439 

41 

140 

706 

21 

4 

7 
24 

4 
29 


102 
111 
860 
220 
2,393 

494 

1,453 

5,301 

521 

148 

108 

65 

204 

271 


67 

55 

628 

46 

1,159 

396 

1,873 

1,829 

131 

110 

163 

58 

160 

139 


Only  7  months  received 


48 
555 


16 
120 


21 

7 

74 

227 

11 


611 
892 
158 
290 
3,379 

29 

38 

70 

146 

228 

97 
373 
656 
398 
123 

619 
198 
240 
262 
175 

391 
199 
614 
129 
91 

639 

643 

160 

1,322 

87 


686 
495 
147 
93 
1,525 

27 

24 

51 

284 

196 

95 
140 
413 

264 
82 

357 
131 
169 
131 


605 
95 
28 

512 
514 

53 
611 

40 


Under 
$50 


2,  5 14 
745 
063 
201 

2.  203 

335 
6S2 

268 
99 
152 


463 
2,281 
1,351 

214 

636 
7,988 
3,148 

646 


486 
396 

2,435 
319 

4,409 

926 
3,161 
8,983 
1,966 

481 

657 
291 
657 
785 


1,332 
622 
294 
347 

5,001 

238 
112 
198 
830 
885 

337 
3,59 
1,390 
513 
335 

2,551 
570 
579 
379 
571 

581 
193 
1,178 
170 
470 

1,391 
1,641 

271 
1,373 

291 


Auto 

theft 


1, 116 

109 

132 

!4 

368 

84 
111 
46 
41 
30 


52 
584 
133 

35 


80 
,513 


41 
43 

437 
94 

994 

226 
1,264 
4,368 

291 
52 

65 
20 
110 
49 


198 
366 

78 
87 


35 

10 

19 

155 

161 

56 
80 
167 
92 
92 

341 
151 
169 
87 
91 


71 

225 

23 

43 

292 
311 

33 
394 

29 


102 

Table  35— NUMBER  OF  OFFENSES  KNOWN  TO  THE  POLICE, 
CITIES  OVER  25,000  IN  POPULATION— Continued 


City 


Teaneck,  N.J 

Temple,  Tex 

Terre  Haute,  Ind. 

Toledo,  Ohio. 

Topeka,  Kans 


Torrington,  Conn. 

Trenton,  N.  J 

Troy,  N.  Y 

Tucson,  Ariz 

Tulsa,  Okla 


Tuscaloosa,  Ala 

Tyler,  Tex 

Union  City,  N.  J 

Union,  N.  J. --- 

University  City,  Mo. 


Upper  Darby,  Pa 

Utica,  N.  Y 

Vallejo,  Calif 

Valley  Stream,  N.  Y_ 
Vancouver,  Wash 


Vicksburg,  Miss. 

Waco,  Tex 

Waltham,  Mass- 
Warren,  Ohio — 
Warwick,  R.  I--. 


Washington,  D.  C. 
Washington,  Pa — 
Water  bury,  Conn- 
Waterloo,  Iowa 

Watertown,  Mass.. 


Watertown,  N.  Y. 

Waukegan,  111 

Wausau,  Wis 

Wauwatosa,  Wls.. 
West  Allis,  Wis... 


West  Hartford,  Conn.. 

West  Haven,  Conn 

West  New  York,  N.  J.. 

West  Orange,  N.  J 

West  Palm  Beach,  Fla. 


Weymouth,  Mass.. 
Wheeling,  W.  Va... 
White  Plains,  N.  Y. 

Wichita,  Kans 

Wichita  Falls,  Tex.. 


Wilkes-Barre,  Pa.. 
Wllkinsburg,  Pa... 
Williamsport,  Pa.. 
Wilmington,  Del-. 
Wilmington,  N.  C. 


Winona,  Minn 

Wlnston-Salem,  N.  C. 

Woodbridge,  N.  J 

Woonsocket,  R.I 

Worcester,  Mass 


Wyandotte,  Mich.. 

Yakima,  Wash 

Yonkers,  N.  Y 

York,  Pa.. 

Youngstown,  Ohio. 


Zanesville,  Ohio. 


Murder, 
noimegU- 
gent  man- 
slaughter 


Robbery 


Aggra- 
vated 
assault 


68 
13 
51 
112 


904 

1 

12 

15 


15 
11 
100 
25 


6 
52 

2 
18 
10 
10 
104 


Bur- 
glary- 
breaking 
or  enter- 
ing 


115 
101 
270 


Larceny— theft 


$50  and 
over 


36 
52 
120 


Only  11  months  received 
78 


162 

Complete  data  not  received 

6 

12 

1 

16 
3 


Under 
$50 


4 

246 

2 

5 


4,521 


Complete  data  not  received 
64  52 

68  281  109 


No  reports  received 
1 

61 
206 
200 


3 

18 
282 


250 
Only  6  months  received 


62 
171 
598 


413 

183 

878 

104 

55 

17 

58 

10 

642 

271 

531 

19f 

173 

67 

118 

85 

477 

200 

1,386 

315 

1,094 

927 

1,722 

529 

78 

59 

131 

22 

182 

78 

152 

109 

60 

181 

206 

113 

209 

197 

77 

403 

230 

111 

653 

117 

76 

425 

53 

88 

183 

130 

103 

554 

79 

29 

62 

385 

176 

1,064 

135 

54 

275 

143 

115 

344 

157 

102 

91 

4,580 

1,939 

7,749 

36 

47 

128 

235 

129 

323 

136 

148 

632 

111 

48 

151 

100 

95 

270 

98 

101 

305 

37 

30 

246 

85 

39 

210 

48 

41 

320 

59 

46 

84 

47 

43 

65 

125 
401 


94 

57 

62 

256 

185 

317 

1,153 

553 

2,391 

372 

420 

1,262 

153 

69 

146 

82 

27 

165 

181 

79 

328 

551 

389 

1,217 

321 

120 

364 

32 

53 

262 

365 

140 

462 

2 

94 

104 

211 

16 

788 

310 

1,103 

1 

124 

62 

258 

n 

311 

135 

1,110 

29 

287 

143 

656 

24 

157 

87 

563 

32 

389 

437 

1,010 

3 

115 

94 

416 

>  Larcenies  not  separately  reported. 
'  Larceny  figures  not  available. 


Figure  listed  includes  both  major  and  minor  larcenies. 


103 


Offenses  Known  in  Jurisdictions  Outside  the  United  States 

A  number  of  police  agencies  outside  the  48  States  are  among  the 
voluntary  contributors  under  the  uniform  crime  reporting  program. 
Areas  represented  here  are  closely  associated  with  the  United  States 
and  include  the  Commonwealth  of  Puerto  Rico,  territories  of  Alaska 
and  Hawaii,  the  Panama  Canal  Zone,  and  Guam. 

Rural  and  urban  crime  are  combined  except  where  available 
separately  for  cities.  In  presenting  crime  figures  from  contributors 
Ion  other  pages  of  this  bulletin,  the  rural  and  urban  data  are  compiled 
separately. 

The  following  crime  figures  were  not  used  in  tables  on  crime  trends 
and  crime  rates. 

Table   36.— OFFENSES    KNOWN    IN   JURISDICTIONS    OUTSIDE    THE 
UNITED  STATES,   1953 

[Population  figures  based  on  1950  decennial  census] 


Jurisdiction  reporting 

Murder, 

non- 
negligent 

man- 
slaughter 

Rob- 
bery 

Aggra- 
vated 
assault 

Burgla- 
ry- 
breaking 

or 
entering 

Larceny— theft 

Over 
$50 

Under 
$50 

theft 

\laska: 

Second    judicial    division    (Nome), 
population,     12,272;      number    of 
offenses  known. 

1 

13 
17 

1 
34 
4 
1 
1 

3 

103 

6 
12 

35 

8 
53 
10 

1 
2 

5 

571 

24 
72 

154 

157 

1,127 

299 

66 

148 

147 
2,826 

10 
123 

48 

31 
505 
129 
10 
11 

82 
689 

14 
160 

90 

282 
2,788 
598 
174 
343 

751 
5,206 

Anchorage  city,  population,  11,254; 
number  of  offenses  known 

162 

3uam:    Population,  59,498;  number  of 
offenses  known 

5 

2 
9 
2 
4 
4 

3 

158 

Bawaii: 

Hawau  County,  population,  68,350; 
number  of  offenses  known 

Honolulu  City,  population,  248,034; 
number  of  offenses  known. .. 

24 

Honolulu  County,  population,  104,986; 
number  of  offenses  known. 

Kauai   County,   population,   29,905; 
number  of  offenses  known 

Maui    County,    population,    48,519; 
number  of  offenses  known 

ifothmus    of    Panama:      Canal     Zone, 
population,  52,822;   number  of  offenses 
known 

Puerto     Rico:      Population,     2,210,703; 
number  of  offenses  known  . 

23 

SUPPLEMENTAL  CRIME  DATA 

Crimes  of  rape  are  forcible  in  nature  in  about  54  percent  of  the 
cases;  almost  53  percent  of  the  robberies  occur  on  the  street  or  high- 
way;'oil  stations  are  victims  in  less  than  5  percent  of  the  robberies 
over  24  percent  of  the  burglaries  occur  in  the  daytime;  and  in  mort 
than  78  out  of  100  daytime  burglaries,  homes  are  attacked. 

Such  analyses  are  made  by  police  locally  as  a  part  of  the  administrai 
tive  study  of  the  local  crime  problem.  This  additional  detail  con< 
cerning  crime  is  forwarded  by  cities  of  25,000  or  more  inhabitants  t< 
the  FBI  each  month  in  a  supplementary  crime  report. 

Breakdowns  are  for  the  rape,  robbery,  burglary,  larceny,  and  aut< 
theft  classifications.  In  addition  to  indicating  certain  types  of  crime 
within  these  main  classifications,  this  form  provides  for  collectin 
information  concerning  the  value  of  property  stolen  as  well  as  th 
value  of  stolen  property  recovered  by  tj^pe  of  property. 

In  connection  with  the  larceny  classification,  this  supplementar 
type  information  indicates  that  almost  17  percent  of  the  thefts  i 
cities  involve  bicycles.  On  a  local  basis,  such  information  is  pertiner 
to  such  questions  as  to  whether  the  licensing  of  bicycles  as  an  identifio 
tion  aid  is  sufficient,  and  whether  additional  precautionary  steps  a] 
needed  in  certain  areas  of  the  city.  Such  information  is  useful  in  a 
educational  program  among  owners  of  bicycles  and  so  on. 

One  serious  problem  highlighted  by  the  analysis  of  the  larcei 
classification  is  the  frequency  with  which  automobiles  are  attack( 
for  theft  aside  from  the  theft  of  the  automobiles  themselves.     In  mo 
than  39  percent  of  the  cases  of  larceny,  property  of  some  kind 
stolen  from  an  automobile;  either  accessories  of  the  automobde 
other  property  contained  in  the  automobile.     This  portion  of  t 
analysis  can  be  extended  locally  to  include  a  review  of  the  areas 
the  city  where  such  thefts  are  concentrated.     Armed  with  this  inf( 
mation  the  police  may  institute  certain  tactical  changes  such  as  shi: 
of  patrol  strength  to  the  trouble  areas. 

Although  purse-snatchings  and  pocket-pickings  together  constiti 
only  3.5  percent  of  the  thefts,  it  may  be  noted  that  almost  21,000 
these  crimes  were  reported  by  the  police  whose  reports  were  used 
the  following  analyses.  Purse-snatching  particularly  is  closely  al 
to  the  crime  of  robbery.  If  the  purse-snatcher  forcibly  overpow. 
the  victim  by  knocking  the  victim  down,  the  ofi"ense  would  be  class 
under  the  rules  as  a  crime  of  robbery  rather  than  pm-se-snatchii 
The  purse-snatchings  included  in  the  larceny  classification  are  th( 
which  are  unaccompanied  by  any  such  force. 

For  each  100  automobiles  stolen  in  1953,  the  poUce  recovered 
(93.9  percent  recovery). 

(104) 


105 


Of  the  477  cities  of  25,000  or  more  forwarding  a  full  set  of  crime 
'ports  during  1953,  418  furnished  the  supplementary  crime  data 
5ed  here  in  addition  to  the  basic  monthly  report  which  reflects  the 
)tal  crimes  in  each  major  classification  (the  Part  I  offenses). 

Although  cities  under  25,000  in  population  and  rural  areas  are  not 
iquested  to  send  in  the  supplementary  crime  reports,  it  is  possible 
L  any  general  study  to  apply  the  percentage  distribution  obtained 
om  the  supplementary  reports  to  the  total  crimes  estimated  in  this 
illetin  for  the  United  States.  This  might  serve  as  a  rough  guide  to 
le  number  of  the  various  crimes  such  as  pocket-picking,  purse- 
latching,  residence  burglaries,  highway  robberies,  and  so  on,  that 
!cur  each  year.  An  application  of  this  idea  will  be  noted  in  the  text 
1  estimated  crimes,  beginning  on  page  69. 

^BLE  37.— OFFENSE  AN.A.LYSIS,  BY  NATURE  OF  CRIMINAL  ACT 
TIME  AND  PLACE  OF  COMMISSION,  AND  VALUE  OF  PROPERTY 
STOLEN,   1953 

lenses  known  to  the  police  in  418  cities  over  25,000  in  population;  total  population  56,050,636,  based  on  1950 

decennial  census] 


Classification 

Number  of 
offenses 

Percent  distri- 
bution 

Total 

7,723 

Forcible 

4,150 
3,573 

Statutory 

abery: 

Total 

46.3 

44,  891 

Highway .. 

23,711 
11,777 
2,142 
842 
3,797 
117 
2,505 

Commercial  house 

Oil  station 

26.  2 

Chain  store 

Residence.                                                                                      "" ^ 

1.9 

Bank 

Miscellaneous.. 

0.  2 

rglary— breaking  or  entering: 
Total 

5.  6 

258, 402 

Residence  (dwelling): 

Committed  during  night 

58, 233 
49,483 

137, 064 
13,  622 

22.5 
19.1 

53.1 
5.3 

Committed  during  day 

Nonresidence  (store,  office,  etc.) : 
Committed  during  night 

Committed  during  dav 

ceny— theft  (except  auto  theft)  (grouped  according  to  value  of  article 
Total 

$50  and  over 

171,  294 
344, 251 
81, 938 

$5.00  to  $50.00 

28.7 

Under  $5.00 

ceny— theft  (grouped  as  type  of  offense) : 
Total ... 

597, 483 

Pocket-picking 

8,115 

12,605 

23, 910 

122  IfiS 

Purse-snatching.. 

Shoplifting 

2. 1 

Thefts  from  autos  (exclusi  ve  of  auto  accessories) 

Auto  accessories 

112,291  I                       18.8 
101,  260                         16. 9 

Bicycles 

All  others 

60.  t 

106 


The  average  victim  of  robbery,  burglary  or  other  theft  in  1953  los 
$223  as  against  $233  in  1952.  However,  the  property  loss  was  near! 
a  quarter  of  a  billion  dollars  in  the  400  cities  furnishing  informatio 
concerning  the  value  of  property  stolen. 

In  1953  the  average  loss  in  a  robbery  was  $222  w^iile  $163  was  log 
in  the  average  burglary.  The  average  value  was  $1,038  for  each  autc 
mobile  stolen  while  the  average  loss  in  other  types  of  thefts  was  $76. 

On  a  per  capita  basis,  $4.13  was  lost  to  robbers  and  thieves  by  eac 
of  the  inliabitants  in  the  400  cities  represented  in  the  tabulation.  . 
corresponding  figure  for  1952  was  $4.09  per  capita  in  the  reportin 
cities. 

Table  38.— VALUE  OF  PROPERTY  STOLEN,  BY  TYPE  OF  CRIME,  19{ 

[From  reports  of  400  cities  over  25,000  in  population;  total  population  54,425,S18,  based  on  1950  decenn 
census.    All  values  have  been  rounded  off  to  even  dollars] 


Classification 


TOTAL.. 

Robbery 

Burglary 

Larceny— theft 
Auto  theft 


Number  of 
offenses 


1,005,929 


44,  240 
252. 148 
584, 934 
124,  607 


Value  of  prop- 
erty stolen 


$224,552,605 


9,  824, 044 
41,  054,  580 
44,  294,  102 
129,  378, 979 


Averagi 

value  pc 

offeii.se 


As  usual,  automobiles  constituted  over  half  of  the  property  loss 
criminals  in  the  reporting  cities.  Over  56  percent  of  the  value 
merchandise  reported  stolen  by  these  cities  was  for  automobih 
Further  analyses  of  the  types  of  property  stolen  shows  that  curren' 
and  other  negotiables  accounted  for  11.5  percent  of  the  proper 
stolen  while  jewelry  and  precious  metals  comprised  7.6  percent  of  t. 
loot  and  furs  3.1  percent  of  property  stolen.  Clothing  and  miscellan 
ous  items  totaled  21.2  percent  of  the  value  of  property  stolen. 

As  might  be  expected,  stolen  automobiles  are  high  on  the  list 
property  recovered;  92.3  percent  of  the  value  of  automobiles  stoL 
is  recovered. 

The  information  concerning  the  value  of  property  stolen  and  t. 
value  of  property  recovered  was  furnished  on  the  supplementa 
forms  by  396  of  the  cities  furnishing  such  forms.  These  cities  repi 
sented  a  total  population  of  52,096,989  under  the  1950  decenni 
census. 


107 


Table  39.— VALUE  OF  PROPERTY  STOLEN  AND  VALUE  OF  PROPERTY 
RECOVERED,  BY  TYPE  OF  PROPERTY,  1953 

[From  reports  of  396  cities  over  2i'i,000  in  population;  total  population  52,096,989,  based  on  1950  decennial 
census.    All  values  have  been  rounded  off  to  even  dollars] 


Type  of  property 


Value  of  property 


Stolen 


Recovered 


Percent 
recovered 


TOTAL,. ._ 

Currency,  notes,  etc -.. 

Jewelry  and  precious  metftls 

Furs.. 

Clothing 

Locally  stolen  automobiles.. 
Miscellaneous.. 


$215, 129, 407 


.$127,  678, 432 


59.3 


24,  714, 639 
16,  331,  525 
6,  573,  324 
11,479,93? 
121, 837,  419 
34, 192,  562 


2, 895,  275 
2,041,142 
304,917 
1,  262,  456 
112,514,775 
8, 659, 867 


11.7 
12.5 
4.6 
11.0 
92  3 
25.3 


AGE,  SEX,  AND  RACE  OF  PERSONS  ARRESTED 

Source 

For  the  second  year,  the  age,  sex,  and  race  of  persons  arrested  data 
are  from  special  report  forms  sent  in  by  city  police.  Since  the  figures 
are  only  for  arrests  in  1,174  cities,  they  are  not  total  arrests  in  the 
United  States;  however,  the  reporting  area  covers  about  42  percent 
of  the  city  population.  Thus,  the  tables  give  a  rather  complete 
index  to  the  spread  of  arrests  in  cities  by  crime  class,  age,  sex,  and 
race. 

These  statistics  since  1952  cannot  be  compared  with  similar  data 
published  prior  to  that  year.  Before  1952  the  only  local  arrest  infor- 
mation available  for  analysis  as  to  personal  characteristics  was  that 
shown  in  fingerprint  arrest  cards  received  by  the  FBI  from  local  police 
agencies.  Not  all  persons  arrested  are  fingerprinted  (particularly 
young  persons)  so  that  source  fell  far  short  of  completeness,  but  the 
data  were  valuable  until  such  time  as  the  police  generally  were  in  a 
position  to  fill  out  the  present  annual  Age,  Sex,  and  Race  of  Persons 
Arrested  form. 

The  annual  arrest  report  form  now  used  calls  for  a  tally  of  all 
persons  arrested  for  violations  that  happened  in  the  reporting  city. 
(Arrests  for  driving  while  intoxicated  and  negligent  manslaughters  are 
included  but  other  traffic  matters  are  not.) 

All  persons  arrested  are  counted  even  though  some  are  released  and 
not  formally  charged  before  a  court.  Each  person  arrested  is  counted 
rather  than  the  number  of  charges  that  may  be  filed  against  one 
person.  An  arrest  of  a  juvenile  is  put  opposite  the  offense  actually 
committed.  This  is  true  even  though  a  technical  charge,  such  as 
juvenile  delinquency,  must  be  filed  under  local  procedure. 

Reports  were  not  used  in  the  following  situations:  (1)  if  police 
advised  that  not  all  juveniles  were  counted;  or  (2)  it  was  obvious 
from  the  report  that  juveniles  were  not  inchidefl.  On  the  other 
hand,  a  few  reports  were  used  when  the  police  indicated  that  due  to 
local  procedures  not  all  the  youthful  oft'enders  detained  came  into 
their  hands.  For  this  reason  the  juvenile  arrest  data  still  tend  to 
understate  the  problem  although  the  picture  is  much  more  complete 
than  it  was  from  the  fingerprint  cards  used  before  1952. 

It  will  be  recognized  that  the  number  of  arrests  does  not  represent 
the  number  of  crimes  that  occur.  This  is  true  because  there  is  not  an 
arrest  for  each  crime.  As  pointed  out  on  page  110  (Classification  of 
Offenses),  no  information  is  collected  for  "od'enses  known"  for  the 
Part  II  class  of  offenses.  Offenses  known  data  for  the  Part  I  class  of 
offenses  appear  in  other  parts  of  this  bulletin. 

(108) 


109 

Additional  arrest  information  will  be  found  in  the  semiannual 
issue  of  this  bulletin.  Such  information  is  derived  from  another 
annual  report,  Return  C,  received  from  police.  Return  C  includes 
arrest  information  for  Part  I  and  Part  II  offense  classes.  It  shows  by 
classification  the  number  of  persons:  (1)  arrested  and  released  without 
a  formal  charge;  (2)  charged;  (3)  charged  as  the  result  of  an  arrest; 
(4)  charged  after  being  summoned,  notified,  or  cited;  (5)  found  guilty 
of  the  offense  charged;  and  (6)  found  guilty  of  a  lesser  offense  than 
originally  charged.  Return  C  does  not  list  arrest  information  by  age, 
sex,  or  race. 

dumber  of  Arrests,  1953 

Last  year  1,791,160  arrests  were  reported  by  the  1,174  city  police 
lepartments  represented  in  the  following  tabulations.  The  1950  popu- 
lation of  these  communities  was  37,255,808,  or  about  42  percent  of  the 
people  living  in  cities  in  the  United  iStates.  Assuming  the  arrest  rate 
^\  as  the  same  for  the  unreported  area  (58  percent  of  the  urban  popula- 
tion) it  may  be  roughly  stated  that  about  4,000,000  people  were  ar- 
losted  in  our  urban  communities  during  1953. 

Stated  another  way,  considering  the  estimated  increase  in  urban 
copulation  since  1950,  1  out  of  every  22  city  residents  was  arrested 
ast  year  for  something  more  serious  than  a  traffic  violation. 

For  a  discussion  of  estimates  as  to  current  urban  population,  see 
3age  87  of  this  bulletin. 

For  crime  against  the  person,  there  were  96,662  arrests  while  159,013 
irrests  were  made  for  crimes  with  property  as  their  object  in  the  re- 
oorting  cities.  Crimes  against  the  person  are :  cruninal  homicide;  rape ; 
md  assault.  Property  crimes  are:  robbery;  burglary;  larceny;  auto 
:heft;  embezzlement  and  fraud;  buying  and  receiving  stolen  property; 
ind  forgery  and  counterfeiting. 
ige  of  Persons  Arrested,  1953 

Of  the  1,791,160  arrests  recorded  by  the  1,174  reporting  cities,  8.4 
Percent  were  persons  17  years  of  age  or  less  and  14.7  percent  were 
mder  21. 

Over  two-fifths  of  the  arrests  were  for  public  intoxication  and  youths 
mder  18  comprised  less  than  1  percent  of  that  group.  On  the  other 
land,  53.6  percent  of  the  persons  arrested  for  auto  theft  were  juveniles 
md,  in  fact,  29.0  percent  were  not  even  old  enough  to  get  a  regular 
Iriver's  license  in  most  states  (age  16).  Nearly  half  (49.3  percent) 
)f  the  persons  arrested  for  burglary  were  not  yet  18  and  two-thirds 
)f  these  were  under  16  years  of  age. 


no 


o 

I— I 

O 

0^ 


>     s 
O     g 

H      S 


o 


1-H  o 


lO 

'^ 

05 

1 

»o 

r/) 

^ 

CM 

tc 

t) 

n 

O 

o 

rt 

ea 

o 

3 

n 

w 

O. 

o 

c3 

< 

b 

H 

Y^ 

CQ 

r/5 

H 

(1) 

H 

« 

« 

<J 

< 


1  fH  .-<  ^  ^  t^  O  '^f  CC 


'»0;0C^         OC^CC»CO         C^t— CCiC 


—"  ^  ^         1—  CO 


t—  CC  iC  Q 

^  —  c^  ^ 


r^cooor-co      Oi  Oi  ^c  Oi-^      co-^icrcr*      coooiO'^^-      otC'^r^-o 

OiCOOClOO        OOWOOO        W^OSiCiO        cscc-^-^— '        CCOCCJCOCl 

M^c^r^Tf   io?5r-^o^   -^r-oocccs   oi  —  ccooo   -^oyr^j^ 


^  ^   o  -^ 


OC^C^OliC   -^CCOiOC^   ^r^OiTj-oi   c^cccsoc^   »crot^i^c^ 

<;c  CC  t^  "M  Q   -»»*  c^  »o  t^  CO   CM  O  O  to  t'-   cc  00  o  ^  re   o  »c  r 


cc  OS  <i;  »  -^ 


>  re  r^  -*  « 

3  ic  ^  ?c  "5 


^»ci^ccQ      ot^tocMr^      CO  to  ^  cc  05 
MOsoOQW      eoicc^or-      CM<C(Mcct^ 

CM         CCOW5        OOCMCC(N^         CD^CCOCM 


Ci  CC  00  Oa  ^ 


cc  lO  ic  X  ec 


r^  h*  «o  o  ^ 
CO  CO  c^j  r^  o 
(M  — '  (^  r-  .-. 

ciOi* 


iUOOO-rJ"         TTCftCCOiafl  'J'OC^OOiC 


fO  00  ^  "^  O         iC  Ci  —  CM  Oi         O  Oi  O -rt*  iC 


CMCOCCCCOO         COOOXO 
CCt-HCCiC-^         fOCCO'-      "" 


JTTCC  — CC  OOOCMOGO 

—  TGCoit—      oo»c^-o:o 


rj«    -^   Oi    ^    -H 

CM  Tf  r^  CO  ^ 

iC  "C  coco  Tt" 


ox  t^ -^  — ■ 


CM-^  cc       ccr^  — .  CM 


»--         ■^CM.— '         CMtt-^CCCM         OOOiiOC 


Tf^COOlTfTt^  r^iOOO"00  t--e000TfOl  CC— 'CMOh-  iCuO-^OiCM 

CC^^'^Olt^  OiOr--CMCM  COt-TPi— to  CCO0t--Gi0h-  C^t--CMX  — 

»0  t^  t*  Oi  t^ -^  ■*  ^  CM  ^  CM  lO '^J*  iO«X»OCC  t^  Oi  Oi  O  CM 

CM  i-T  r^  cStr^  'ry''^        CO'fd' 


lO  CM  Oi  05  CM         CO  CC -^  O  "*         .— '  C^  to  iO  OS         X  X  t^  <M  t-* 

OlcO-^COt^         tOOlcOrrX         COt^-^-^OS         XQXeOfC 


CMi— it^iOCC    iCCOt"*- 


C^J    t-  ,-. 


CM  I^    CO  C*f   CO  lO 


lO  ^  rr  CM  C^ 

t^  iC  --H  CO  Cl 


-i^ior^o;      o— icorrx 
<  r^  oi  Oi  CO      lo  t^  Tf  CO  CO 

SCDiOCM  CMi-HCO^CO 


CO  »0  O  Oi  Oi 
r-  CM  t-  ^  CO 
'^j"  CO  r^  ^  O 

cm'i^' 


CM  X  X  CM  -^ 
CO  C35  iC  CM  CO 
1-^  -^        CO*"  to 


CO  t^  to  i-'  CO         O  X  CO -^  CO 
to  CO  CM  i-H  Qj         to -^  CD  CO  r^ 


^  05  CO  -^  X 
C^  ^  ^  rr  CM 


»—  !•*         O  ^         CO  t 


C3  CO  CO  CO  Tf 

■^  Tf  o  r-  ic 


OOCiCMCM         (MXO 


'OcoooiC'i      cor--  —  1— 'lo 


CO^tO         CMt— t-C^  CMC^ir-COCM 


^  ^  lO   CO  ^   CO  to 


CO  CM  CO  ox 


—  Tf  CM  to  3i 


^O'^fCO    t^  —  CO  CO  O    CO  ^  X  CM  CO 

t^  lO  CO    CO  to  O  CO '-'    CM  CO  CO  Tj- CM 


CO  o  —  ■3'  to 
oi-  -^  ci  — 

to  CO  CO  CI  CO 


SCO  CM  :0  X 
—  CO  X  w 

—  O  CO  c:  O 


— <    1-H  CM^ 


^    CD    CD  CM    CO  CO 


r^  --  CM  to  r 


;  CM  I:--    to  CO  -^  to  CM 


"  CM  ■^  CO 
.  O  -^  to  CM 
»  CM  lO  CM  .-H 

CMCO"--''" 


CO  Ol  O  X  CM 


O  CO  —  t-   o -^  X  r*  ■^ 


CO  — ■  TT  Ol  t^ 

r  .  J  —  t- 

to  CO  Ol  CO  o 

r-T    to 


cr  o  CM  —  c 

0  -*  X  r^  '^j 

01  CM  CM  CD  CD 


'^f  CM    Tf  CD 


CM  X  X  CO  .-H    050COCOCM    .— ^  CO  CO  r^   X -*  CO  t— CO 

cOf-iOtot-      coxtocMco      oir-^to.  o-H      o-^CMr--- 


■■  "^  T— t    X  >— '  O  C^ -— '    ,— .  CM  ^- Tf  — ' 


to  CM  to  CM  ^ 


O  CO  CO  CM  CM 

r-  I-  ^  o  X 


1-H    lO    CM  ^ 


X  r^  to  to  lO   CM  .— ■  o  to  o 

CMf-<XO:I^   X  CO  CD  X  tP 

Tt*  CM  X    Ol  Tf  05    ^ 


CO  OS '^  r- CO   t^  CM  ■**<  Ol  ^ 
^  ^    Tt»      CO  CMX   t^ 


CM  ^  CO  CM  OS 

CM  CO  ox  Ol 
CM  t^  -H  Tf  Tf 

i-T    CM'r-*" 


to  CMX  t--  O 


O  •<*•  CO  CD  CO 
—  ^  TT  ■■  ~ 

o^  t- 

CO-^I^'CM 


COOtOO         CMCMCDCMX 


r-- OS  t—         .— >^  TT  Tp  Ol         to  Ol  CM  Tf^  CO         CO  to  —  .— I  X         ■— t  CO  CO  CD  o 
-_..__..  ^  CMr-.COCOiOCMiOO 


lOOl  to  CM  O 
.-•         '!*"  CO  t-- 

tO  CO  OS 


CO  -^  t^  r 

CO  CO  ^ 


lO  tO  Ol  to  W         Ol  1— 4  t-- X  Ol 

oioi'-^r-'CM      Ol  —  X      Tf 


X  C^  t-^  CM  X 

CMco       ;o  CO 


^  0%  CO  rH  CO 

_|^H   t^  ^  ^^ 

o»  ^"-H  t-Tco 


.-•  CO  kO  •-<  •-(         »0  «0  ■^  OO  CO         CD  *S«  CD  CO  CO 
O  Ca  Tj*  •**<  CO         CO -H -^  <»  ^         OSO^O'^ 


r^HOOOeOCD         ^H«Dl^^^ 


o  r-  CD  t-  CO 


•-<  04  C0         CO  CD  C4  •-« 


^^^Hcofr— OS       t^t«-eoi^co 


r^^       ^ 


3  bD  '^ 

CO  P  "S 

as  •-  3 

■M^  c 

at.  « 


Eg- 


Its 

5  g-"  S  a 
DfeaSo 


'S-S-cis 


bB'C 

by  s)  ,  o  o 

fc.9  "  " 

;„-  03  g  S  J? 


£  u.S  o  fe 


S  h  s  'a  o 

«  3  tn_ 


Ill 

ABLE  41.— NUMBER  AND  PERCENTAGE  OF  ARRESTS  OF  PERSONS 
UNDER  18,  UNDER  21,  AND  UNDER  25  YEARS  OF  AGE,  1953;  1,174 
CITIES  OVER  2,500  IN  POPULATION 

[Total  population  37,255,808,  based  on  1950  decennial  census] 


Offense  charged 


TOTAL. 


riminal  homicide: 

(a)  Murder   and   nonnegligent   man- 

slaughter  

(b)  Manslaughter  by  negligence 

obbery.- 

egravated  assault - 

ther  assaults 


urglary— breaking  or  entering..- 

arceny— theft... 

uto  theft 

mbezzlement  and  fraud 

olen  property;  buying,  receiving,  etc. 


orgery  and  counterfeiting 

ape 

restitution  and  commercialized  vice. 

ther  sex  offenses .._ 

arcotic  drug  laws... 


eapons;  carrying,  possessing,  etc... 
ffenses  against  family  and  children. 

iquor  laws 

riving  while  intoxicated 

isorderly  conduct 


runkenness 

agrancy 

ambling. 

jspicion 

11  other  offenses. 


Number  of  persons  arrested 


Total 


1,  791, 160 


2,199 

1,191 

11.786 

21,114 

68, 135 

36,  879 
68, 195 
20, 391 
11,877 
2,734 

7,151 
4,023 
20,  345 
14, 341 
5,681 

13, 185 
19,616 
33,  714 

79,  498 
199,  548 

774,  096 

75,  754 
39,  656 

76,  703 
183,  348 


Under 
18 


149,  806 


90 

46 

2,116 

1,277 
3,586 

18,170 

27,  367 

10, 9.38 

431 

681 

473 
6.52 
235 
2,296 
235 

1,546 
1,229 

2,872 

389 

15,994 

4,595 
3,099 
453 
11,578 
39,  458 


Under 
21 


263, 400 


242 

172 

4,290 

2,815 

8,355 

23,  319 
34,  907 
14,  2.38 
1,517 
1,000 

1,185 
1,  .519 
2,180 
3,453 
933 

3,030 
2,286 

7,647 

2,921 

34,  338 

22,083 
9,065 
1,408 
23,  266 
57,  231 


Under 
25 


446,311 


519 

365 

6,721 

5,591 

17,925 

27,  608 
41,699 
16,  523 
2,842 
1,337 

2,171 
2,254 
7,971 
5,387 
2,344 

5,079 
4,968 
10,  677 
11,786 
63,  256 

71,  856 
16,  827 
4,084. 
35,961 
80,560 


Percentage 


Under 
18 


4.1 
3.9 
18.0 
6.0 
5.3 

49.3 
40.1 
53.6 
3.6 
24.9 

6.6 
16.2 

1.2 
16.0 

4.1 

11.7 
6.3 

8.5 
0.5 
8.0 

0.6 
4.1 
1.1 
15.1 
21.5 


Under 
21 


14.7 


11.0 
14.4 
36.4 
13.3 
12.3 

63.2 
51.2 
69.8 
12.8 
36.6 

16.6 
37.8 
10.7 
24.1 
16.4 

23.0 
11.7 
22.7 
3.7 
17.2 

2.9 
12.0 

3.6 
30.3 
31.2 


Under 
25 


23.6 
30.6 
57.0 
26.5 
26.3 

74.9 
61.1 
81.0 
23.9 
48.9 

30.4 
56.0 
39.2 
37.6 
41.3 

38.5 
25.3 
31.7 
14.8 
31.7 

9.3 
22.2 
10.3 
46.9 
43.9 


Persons  under  21  represented  50.6  percent  of  the  arrests  for  crimes 
gainst  property  (robbery,  burglary,  larceny,  auto  theft,  embezzlement 
nd  fraud,  buying  and  receiving  stolen  property,  and  forgery  and 
ounterf  citing) . 

Arrests  of  juveniles  (under  18)  rose  7.9  percent  in  1953  while  adult 
rrests  increased  1.9  percent.  These  trends  were  reflected  in  reports 
at  in  by  209  large  cities  showing  a  combined  population  of  20,696,876. 
ti  1952  the  police  in  these  places,  for  violations  other  than  traffic, 
rrested  964,980  persons,  78,709  of  whom  were  under  18  years  of  age, 
tid  in  1953  the  arrests  by  the  same  departments  numbered  988,437, 
iveniles  constituting  84,952  of  this  total. 


112 


""wK^^ 


PERSONS  ARRESTED  UNDER 
18  YEARS  OF  AGE 

PERCENT  OF  TOTAL  ARRESTS 

Crimes  Against  Property 

1,174  CITIES-TOTAL  POPULATION  37,255,808 

CALENDAR  YEAR  1953 


OFFENSES  •UNDER  18 

18.0% 


Robbery 


Burglary 


Larceny 


Auto  Theft 


Embezzlement 
and  Fraud 


49.3% 


40.1% 


53.6% 


3.6% 


[ 


24.9% 


Receiving  Stolen  | 
Property 


6.6% 


Forgery  and      H~ 
Counterfeiting    B- 


TOTAL  ARRESTS. 
ALL  AGES 


11,786 


36,879 


68,195 


20,391 


11,877 


2,734 


7,151 


H 
iff 


i 


nncnufn 

fc-'---rifT'iiiii(iTfrnirii 


Figure  14. 


113 


^v  of  Persons  Arrested,  1953 

j  Of  the  1,791,160  persons  arrested  in  1,174  cities  last  year,  194,238 
!•  10.8  percent  were  females.  Male  arrests  numbered  1,596,922  or 
1.2  percent  of  the  arrests  in  these  cities. 

Although  male  arrests  outnumbered  female  arrests  8  to  1,  a  com- 
iiative  study  of  the  criminal  tendencies  of  each  sex  may  be  made. 
y  a  percent  distribution  of  arrests,  it  is  noted  that  out  of  a  thousand 
•rests  of  women,  2  are  arrested  for  murder  while  only  1  male  in  a 
lousand  arrested  is  charged  with  murder.  Female  criminals  also 
■nd  more  to  crimes  of  aggravated  assault,  larceny,  and  embezzlement 
id  fraud  than  do  males.  In  1,000  arrests  of  females,  17  are  arrested 
ir  aggravated  assault  as  compared  with  11  out  of  1,000  male  arrests. 
1  1,000  arrests  for  each  sex,  49  women  and  37  men  are  arrested  for 
Tceny,  11  women  and  6  men  for  embezzlement  and  fraud,  and  5 
omen  and  4  men  for  forgery  and  counterfeiting. 

The  male  criminal  is  more  active  in  burglary,  23  of  each\l,000  males 
Tested  being  so  charged,  but  only  4  in  1,000  females  are  apprehended 
>r  burglary.  Twelve  males  are  auto  thieves  in  1,000  male  arrests 
hile  only  3  in  1,000  female  arrests  are  car  thieves. 

ABLE  42.— DISTRIBUTION  OF  ARRESTS  BY  SEX,   1953;  1,174  CITIES 
OVER  2,500  IN  POPULATION 

[Total  population  37,255,808,  based  on  1950  decennial  census] 


Offense  charged 


TOTAL. 


iminal  homicide; 

(a)  Murder  and  nonnegligent  manslaughter. 

(b)  Manslaughter  by  negligence 

Dbbery 

jgravated  assault 

;her  assaults 


Jrglary — breaking  or  entering 

irceny-theft 

ito  theft 

inbezzlement  and  fraud 

olen  property;  buying,  receiving,  etc. 


)rgery  and  counterfeiting 

ape 

•j  ostitution  and  commercialized  vice. 

;her  sex  ofTenses 

arcotic  drug  laws 


eapons;  carrying,  possessing,  etc... 
iffenses  against  family  and  children. 

quor  laws 

riving  while  intoxicated 

isorderly  conduct 


runkenness 

igrancy 

ambling 

ispicion 

11  other  ofTenses- 


Number 


Total 


1, 791, 160 


2,199 

1,191 

11,786 

21,114 

68, 135 

36, 879 
68, 195 
20, 391 
11,877 
2,734 

7,151 
4,023 
20, 345 
14, 341 
5,681 

13, 185 
19, 616 
33,  714 
79, 498 
199,  548 

774, 096 

75,  754 
39,  656 

76,  703 
183, 348 


Male       Female 


1,  596, 922 


1,838 

1,095 

11, 285 

17,  760 

61, 345 

36, 113 

58,695 

19, 870 

9,698 

2,474 

6,148 
4,023 
5,479 
11, 197 

4,787 

12,506 
17,  794 
27,247 
76, 252 
166, 757 

714, 446 
66, 445 
35,  990 
68,755 

158, 923 


194, 238 


361 
96 

501 
3,354 
6,790 

766 
9,500 

521 
2,179 

260 

1,003 


14, 866 
3,144 


679 

1,822 

6,467 

3,246 

32, 791 

59, 650 
9,309 
3,666 
7,948 

24,425 


Percent 


Total        Male     Female 


.1 
.1 
.7 
1.2 
3.8 

2.1 

3.8 

1.1 

.7 

.2 

.4 
.2 
1.1 
.8 
.3 

.7 

1.1 

1.9 

4.4 

11.1 

43.3 
4.2 
2.2 
4.3 

10.2 


100.0 


.1 

.1 

.7 

1.1 

3.8 

2.3 

3.7 
1.2 
.6 
.2 

.4 
.3 
.3 
.7 
.3 


1.1 

1.7 
4.8 
10.4 

44.6 
4.2 
2.3 
4.3 

10.0 


100.0 


(') 


.2 

.3 

1.7 
3.5 


4.9 
.3 

1.1 
.1 


7.7 
1.6 
.5 


3.3 

1.7 
16.9 

30:7 

4.8 

1.9 

4.1 

12.6 


*  Less  than  H  o  of  1  percent. 


114 


Race  of  Persons  Arrested,  1953 

Table  43  reflects  the  race  of  persons  arrested  in  1,174  cities  in  1953 
Over  97  percent  of  the  1,791,160  persons  arrested  were  members  o 
the  white  and  Negro  races.  Arrests  of  members  of  the  white  rac 
numbered  1,270,466,  or  70.9  percent  of  all  arrests  in  the  1,174  cities 
while  481,095  arrests  or  26.9  percent  were  of  members  of  the  Negr 
race.  Other  arrests,  totaling  39,599  or  2.2  percent  included  Indians 
Chinese,  Japanese,  and  other  races. 

Table   43.— ARRESTS    BY   RACE,    1953;    1,174    CITIES    OVER   2,500   V. 

POPULATION 

[Total  population  37,255,808,  based  on  1950  decennial  census] 


Total  aU 
races 

Race 

Offense  charged 

White 

Negro 

Indian 

Chinese 

Japa- 
nese 

All 
othei 

TOTAL                                          

1, 791, 160 

1,270,466 

481, 095 

32, 084 

407 

144 

6,9 

Criminal  homicide: 

(a)  Murder   and   nonnegligent   man- 

2,199 
1,191 
11,786 
21, 114 
68, 135 

36,  879 
68, 195 
20, 391 
11,877 
2,734 

7,151 
4,023 
20,  345 
14, 341 
6,681 

13, 185 
19,616 
33,  714 
79, 498 
199,  548 

774, 096 

75,  754 
39,  656 

76,  703 
183, 348 

883 

959 

5, 992 

7,611 

39,  728 

26,  285 

45,  893 

15,  772 

9,727 

1,738 

6,074 
2,371 
10,  403 
10,915 
2,563 

5,771 
13,  762 
18. 130 
66,  763 
124,  622 

602, 083 
58,  301 
12,  696 
49,  658 

131,  766 

1,306 
231 

5,665 
13,388 
27,980 

10,318 

21,647 

4,374 

2,099 

972 

1,035 
1.628 
9,769 
3,306 
3,018 

7,334 
5,765 
15,017 
11,623 
72,  340 

144,  718 
15,788 
26,  834 
26,  359 

48,  581 

5 

55 

68 

313 

136 
314 
143 

28 
18 

27 
10 
158 
72 
11 

44 

52 

429 

783 
2,018 

23,  753 

1,141 

18 

418 

2,070 

(b)  Manslaughter  by  negligence 

1 
3 
7 
8 

13 

22 

4 

2 

1 

2 
2 
2 
9 
27 

2 
4 

8 
12 
19 

117 
9 

38 
11 
84 

3 
. 

3 
5 
1 
2 

2 

3 
3 

1 
2 

7 
8 

64 

13 

1 

25 

1 

1 

; 

Stolen  property;  iJuying,  receiving,  etc 

Prostitution  and  commercialized  vice 

Offenses  against  family  and  children 

3,: 

1 

REPORTING  AREA 

Over  95  percent  of  the  people  in  cities  and  towns  and  79.7  percent 
»f  those  in  rural  areas  are  represented  by  the  law-enforcement  agencies 
v'ho  sent  in  crime  figures  in  1953.  The  table  below  shows  details  of 
he  status  of  reporting  by  cities  and  towns.  However,  this  table  is 
lot  an  index  to  the  contributors  or  population  represented  in  other 
ables  of  this  bulletin.  The  number  of  contributors  whose  reports 
vere  used  and  the  population  represented  by  these  contributors  are 
dentified  for  individual  crime  tables. 

There  are  included  in  crime  tables  reports  from  a  contributor  if  (1) 
hat  agency  has  reported  for  the  full  period  of  time  and  (2)  the  reports 
re  not  obviously  incorrectly  compiled. 

Under  the  1950  decennial  census,  the  Bureau  of  the  Census  pub- 
ished  urban  (city  and  town)  population  figures  under  two  definitions. 
levy  briefly  the  1950  definition  of  an  urban  place  permits  inclusion  of 
ertain  densely  populated  areas  outside  of  a  city's  limits  in  the  count 
,»f  the  population  for  that  city.  The  1940  definition  describes  a  place 
.s  urban  if  it  has  2,500  or  more  people  and  is  incorporated.  Since  the 
940  definition  coincides  with  the  main  jurisdictional  limits  of  prac- 
iically  all  our  contributors  and  for  purposes  of  continuity  we  continue 
o  use  the  1940  definition  of  an  urban  place  with  a  very  few  minor 
ixceptions  for  special  circumstances. 

;  For  the  above  reason,  the  table  below  follows  closely  the  1940  defini- 
'ion  in  showing  the  number  of  urban  police  departments  contributing 
rime  reports  in  1953  and  the  population  represented  by  them: 


Population  group 


TOTAL 

Cities  over  250,000 

Cities  100,000  to  250,000 
Cities  .50,000  to  100,000_ 
Cities  25,000  to  50,000__ 
Cities  10,000  to  25,000.. 
Cities  2,.500  to  10,000... 


Cities  or  towns 


Number 


Total 


4,026 


41 
66 
129 
275 
814 
2,701 


Contrib- 
utors 


3,356 


41 
66 
128 
262 
748 
2,111 


Percent 
contrib- 
utors 


83.4 


100.0 
100.0 
99.2 
95.3 
91.9 
78.2 


Population 


Number 


Total 


89, 281,  777 


34,  932, 955 
9,694,111 
9, 134,  357 
9,631,270 
12, 464,  800 
13, 434, 284 


Represent- 
ed by  con- 
tributors 


85, 167, 422 


34, 932, 955 
9,694.111 
9,  067,  789 
9,181,324 
11,478,641 
10, 812, 602 


Percent 
repre- 
sented 


95.4 


100.0 
100.0 
99.3 
95.3 
92.2 
80.5 


In  addition  to  the  3,356  urban  places  in  the  table,  1  or  more  reports 
vere  received  from  203  rural  townships  and  villages,  2,159  sheriffs 
.nd  State  police  organizations,  and  10  agencies  in  Territories  and  other 
egions  administered  by  the  United  States. 

(115) 


CLASSIFICATION  OF  OFFENSES 


Readers  who  are  not  entirely  familiar  with  the  uniform  crime- 
reporting  program  may  be  interested  in  a  brief  explanation  of  the 
contents  of  crime  reports  included  hi  this  bulletin: 

1.  These  crime  figures  are  called  "police  statistics"  to  distinguish 
them  from  judicial  or  penal  statistics  in  the  criminal  field. 

2.  Crimes  that  are  exclusively  Federal  are  not  included. 

3.  Each  reporting  agency  counts  only  those  crimes  or  arrests  foi 
crimes  committed  in  its  jurisdiction.  A  sheriff  reports  only  for  his 
rural  areas  outside  the  city  or  town  limits  of  any  urban  places  in  his 
county.     This  feature  avoids  duplication. 

4.  "Offenses  known  to  the  police"  is  a  term  that  refers  to  thosi 
crimes  included  in  the  Part  I  offenses  of  the  crime  reporting  classii 
fication.     (See  below  for  individual  classes.)     The  Part  I  offenses  ar. 
limited  to  seven  classes  of  grave  off'enses  shown  by  experience  to  b 
those  most  generally  and  completely  reported  to  the  police. 

5.  Off'enses   (crimes)   for  the  Part  I  classes  are  reported  as  the; 
become  known.     The  police  may  learn  of  the  occurrence  of  crime  in  ;' 
number    of    ways:  reports   of   police    officers;    citizens'    complaint 
notification  from  prosecuting  or  court  officials;  or  otherwise. 

6.  Offenses  are  included  without  regard  to:  (a)  the  age  of  tli ' 
offender;  (b)  the  value  of  property  involved;  (c)  the  recovery  of  stole 
property;  (d)  arrests;  or  (e)  prosecutive  action.  The  purpose  is  t 
show  the  amount  of  crime  that  has  occurred  as  distinguished  fror 
arrest  data  and  the  classifying  is  based  strictly  on  the  facts  i: 
possession  of  the  police. 

7.  Complaints  that  are  found  by  pohce  investigation  to  be  ground 
less  are  not  included  in  crime  tables  in  this  bulletin,  and  returns  tha 
appear  incomplete  or  defective  are  excluded. 

8.  Arrest  data  is  not  included  in  "offenses  known"  information  bu 

arrest  data  is  collected  separately  for  the  entire  crime  classificatioi 

Parts  I  and  II.     So,  the  only  information  for  Part  II  offenses  is  tha 

based  on  arrest  data. 

In  publishing  the  data  sent  in  by  chiefs  of  police  in  different  cities 


the  FBI  does  not  vouch  for  their  accuracy.  They  are  given  out  a 
current  information  which  may  throw  some  light  on  problems  of  crim 
and  criminal-law  enforcement. 

The  complete  classification  of  crimes  is  shown  below  with  brie 
definitions  for  each: 

(116) 


117 

'art  I  Offenses 

1.  Criminal  homicide. — {a)  Murder  and  nonnegligent  manslaughter 
icludes  all  willful  felonious  homicides  as  distinguished  from  deaths 
aused  by  negligence.  Does  not  include  attempts  to  kill,  assaults  to 
;ill,  suicides,  accidental  deaths,  or  justifiable  homicides.  Justifiable 
omicides  excluded  from  this  classification  are  limited  to  the  following 
ypes  of  cases:  (1)  The  killing  of  a  felon  by  a  peace  officer  in  line  of 
uty;  (2)  the  killing  of  a  holdup  man  by  a  private  citizen.  (6)  Man- 
laughter  by  negligence  includes  any  death  which  the  police  investiga- 
ioii  establishes  was  primarily  attributable  to  gross  negligence  on  the 
art  of  some  individual  other  than  the  victim. 

2.  Rape. — Includes  forcible  rape,  statutory  rape  (no  force  used — 
ictim  under  age  of  consent),  assault  to  rape,  and  attempted  rape. 

3.  Robbery. — Includes  stealing  or  taking  anything  of  value  from  the 
erson  by  force  or  violence  or  by  putting  in  fear,  such  as  strong-arm 
3l)bery,  stickups,  robbery  armed.  Includes  assault  to  rob  and  at- 
?mpt  to  rob. 

4.  Aggravated  assault. — Includes  assault  with  intent  to  kill;  assault 
y  shooting,  cutting,  stabbing,  maiming,  poisoning,  scalding,  or  by 
le  use  of  acids.  Does  not  include  simple  assault,  assault  and  battery, 
ghting,  etc. 

5.  Burglary — breaking  or  entering. — Includes  burglary,  housebreak- 
ig,  safecracking,  or  any  unlawful  entry  to  commit  a  felon}^  or  a  theft, 
veil  though  no  force  was  used  to  gain  entrance.  Includes  attempts. 
airglary  followed  by  larceny  is  included  in  this  classification  and  not 
3unted  again  as  larceny. 

6.  Larceny — theft  (except  auto  theft). — (a)  Fifty  dollars  and  over  in 
alue;  (b)  under  $50  in  value — includes  in  one  of' the  above  subclassi- 
cations,  depending  upon  the  value  of  the  property  stolen,  thefts 
f  bicycles,  automobile  accessories,  shoplifting,  pocket  picking,  or  any 

Pilling  of  property  or  article  of  value  which  is  not  taken  by  force 
tid  violence  or  by  fraud.  Does  not  include  embezzlement,  "con" 
ames,  forgery,  worthless  checks,  etc. 

7.  Auto  theft. — Includes  all  cases  where  a  motor  vehicle  is  stolen  or 
riven  away  and  abandoned,  including  the  so-called  joy-riding  thefts. 
>oos  not  include  taking  for  temporary  use  when  actually  returned  by 
le  taker,  or  unauthorized  use  by  those  having  lawful  access  to  the 
ehicle. 

art  II  Offenses 

8.  Other  assaults. — Includes  all  assaults  and  attempted  assaults 
hich  are  not  of  an  aggravated  nature  and  which  do  not  belong  in 
ass  4. 

9.  Forgery  and  counterfeiting. — Includes  offenses  dealing  with  the 
laking,  altering,  uttering,  or  possessing,  with  intent  to  defraud,  any- 
ling  false  which  is  made  to  appear  true.     Includes  attempts. 


118 

10.  Embezzlement  and  fraud. — Includes  all  offenses  of  fraudulent 
conversion,  embezzlement,  and  obtaining  money  or  propert}^  by  false 
pretenses. 

11.  Stolen  property;  buying,  receiving,  possessing. — Includes  buying 
receiving,  and  possessing  stolen  property  as  well  as  attempts  to  com- 
mit any  of  those  offenses. 

12.  Weapons;  carrying,  possessing,  etc. — Includes  all  violations  o: 
regulations  or  statutes  controlling  the  carrying,  using,  possessing 
furnishing,  and  manufacturing  of  deadly  weapons  or  silencers  and  al. 
attempts  to  violate  such  statutes  or  regulations. 

13.  Prostitution  and  commercialized  rice. — Includes  sex  offenses  of  i 
commercialized  nature,  or  attempts  to  commit  the  same,  such  ai 
prostitution,  keeping  bawdy  house,  procuring,  transporting,  or  de 
taining  women  for  immoral  purposes. 

14.  Sex  ofenses  (except  rape  and  prostitution  and  commercialize! 
vice).— Includes  offenses  against  chastity,  common  decency,  moral? 
and  the  like.     Includes  attempts. 

15.  Offenses  against  the  family  and  children. — Includes  offenses  o 
nonsupport,  neglect,  desertion,  or  abuse  of  family  and  children. 

16.  Narcotic  drug  laws. — Includes  offenses  relating  to  narcotic  drugs 
such  as  unlawful  possession,  sale,  or  use.     Excludes  Federal  offenses 

17.  Liquor  laws. — With  the  exception  of  "drunkenness"  (class  IS 
and  "driving  while  intoxicated"  (class  22),  liquor  law  violations 
State  or  local,  are  placed  in  this  class.     Excludes  Federal  violation. 

18.  Drunkenness. — Includes  all  offenses  of  drunkenness  or  intox 
cation. 

19.  Disorderly  conduct. — In  eludes -all  charges  of  committing  a  breac 
of  the  peace. 

20.  Vagrancy. — Includes  such  offenses  as  vagabondage,  begginji 
loitering,  etc. 

21.  Gambling. — Includes  offenses  of  promoting,  permitting,  ( 
engaging  in  gambling. 

22.  Driving  while  intoxicated. — Includes  driving  or  operating  an 
motor  vehicle  while  drunk  or  under  the  influence  of  liquor  or  narcotic 

23.  Violation  oj  road  and  driving  laws. — ^Includes  violations  of  reg\; 
lations  with  respect  to  the  proper  handling  of  a  motor  vehicle  1 
prevent  accidents. 

24.  Parking  violations. — Includes  violations  of  parking  ordinance 

25.  Other  violations  of  traffic  and  motor  vehicle  laws. — Includes  violi 
tions  of  State  laws  and  municipal  ordinances  with  regard  to  traffic  aD| 
motor  vehicles  not  otherwise  provided  for  in  classes  22-24. 

26.  All  other  offenses. — Includes  all  violations  of  State  or  local  lav 
for  which  no  provision  has  been  made  above  in  classes  1-25. 

27.  Suspicion  — This  classification  includes  all  persons  arrested  i 
suspicious  characters,  but  not  in  connection  with  any  specific  offens 
who  are  released  without  formal  charges  being  placed  against  them. 


INDEX  TO  VOLUME  XXIV,  UNIFORM  CRIME  REPORTS 

(All  references  are  to  page  numbers) 

6  of  offenders.     (See  Arrests.)  Page 

e,  sex  and  race  of  persons  arrested,  reports  from  police 108-114 

nual  crime  trends: 

Cities  grouped  by  size 72-73 

Cities  grouped  by  location 75-78 

Estimated  total  number  of  major  crimes,  1953 69-71 

Long  term  trends 78-80 

Rural  crime  trends 4,  80-82 

Urban  crime  trends 4,  72-80 

/rests — based  on  age,  sex,  and  race  of  persons  arrested,  reports  from 

jolice 108-114 

Age  of  offenders 108-112 

Sex  of  offenders 113 

Race  of  offenders jj4 

/toinobiles^ — percentage  recovered 69-70,  106 

(iissification  of  offenses 64-65,  116-118 

C  'ared  by  arrest,  offenses 44-48 

By  geographic  divisions^ 48 

C  mes.      (See    Arrests,    estimated    number,    offenses,    persons    charged, 
persons  found  guilty,  and  persons  released.) 

Eiployees,  number  of  police 20-43 

J-isdictions  outside  the  United  States,  offenses  in 103 

^)nth]y  variations,  offenses  known  to  the  police 82-85 

Censes  known  to  the  police: 

Annual  trends 2-4,  69-82 

Cities  grouped  by  location 75-78 

Cities  grouped  by  location  and  size 72-78 

Cities  grouped  by  size 72-73 

Cleared  by  arrest 44-48 

Cleared  by  arrest,  geographic  divisions 48 

Divided  as  to  time  and  place  and  value  of  property  stolen 104-107 

Individual  cities  over  25,000  in  population 11-19,  94-102 

?kIonthly  variations. 82-85 

Rural  areas 10,  80-82 

Jurisdictions  outside  the  United  States 103 

F-sons  charged  (held  for  prosecution) 49-60 

By  geographic  divisions 52-55' 

P-sons  found  guilty 56-60 

P-sons  released  (not  held  for  prosecution) .._   61-63 

?  ice  department  employees 20-43 

^ice  killed 20 

?ipeity,  value  stolen 106-107 

Piperty,  value  stolen  and  recovered __   106-107 

(119) 


120 


Prosecution,  persons  held  for.     (See  Persons  charged  and  persons  found 

guilty.) 
Race  of  offenders.     (See  Arrests.) 

Reporting  area,  extent  of 

Rural  crime  data 4,  10,  80-82, 

Sex  of  offenders.     (See  Arrests.) 

Sheriffs'  reports 4,10,  80-82, 

State  crime  rates.     (See  Offenses  known — cities  grouped  by  location.) 

State  police  reports 4,  10,  80-82, 

Trends,  annual  crime: 

Cities  grouped  by  location 

Cities  grouped  by  size 

Long  term 

Rural- _- 4, 

Urban 4, 

Urban  crime  rates 5-9, 

Value  of  property  stolen 

Value  of  property  stolen  and  recovered 

Variations,  monthly  crime 


92-fl 
92-j 
9241 

75-7 

72-7 
i 
81-8 
72 
86-1 


I 


: 


o 


BOSTON  PUBLIC  LIBRARY 


3  9999  0635 


998  5