Skip to main content

Full text of "United States census of agriculture: 1954"

See other formats


^_ 


Given  By 

DkS.  SUPT.  OF  DOCUMENTS 


3* 


DLPCCITORY 


Vol.  Ill  -  pt.  9    ch.  I 


FARMERS  AND  FARM  PRODUCTION 
IN  THE  UNITED  STATES 

(A  COOPERATIVE  REPORT) 


Wheat  Producers  and 
Wheat  Production 


SPECIAL  REPORTS 


1954 

Census 

of 

Agriculture 


U.  S.  DEPARTMENT  OF  COMMERCE 

BUREAU  OF  THE  CENSUS 


U.  S.  DEPARTMENT  OF  AGRICULTURE 

AGRICULTURAL  RESEARCH  SERVICE 

WASHINGTON  •   7956 


U  J 

v 


U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture 

Eiro  Taft  Benson,  Secretary 

Agricultural  Research  Service 

Byron  T.  Show,  Administrator 


U.  S.  Department  of  Commerce 

Sincloir  Weeks,  Secretary 

Bureau  of  the  Census 

Robert  W.  Burgess,  Director 


United  States 
Census 


Volume   III 
SPECIAL  REPORTS 

Part    9 

Farmers  and  Farm  Production  in  the  United  States 

(A   Cooperative   Report) 


Chapter  I 

Wheat  Producers  and 
Wheat  Production 


CHARACTERISTICS  OF  FARMERS  and  FARM  PRODUCTION    • 
PRINCIPAL  TYPES  OF  FARMS    • 


BUREAU  OF  THE  CENSUS 
Robert  W.  Burgess,  Director 

AGRICULTURE  DIVISION 
Ray  Hurley.  Chief 
Warder  B.  Jenkins,  Assistant  Chief 


AGRICULTURAL  RESEARCH  SERVICE 
Byron  T.  Shaw,  Administrator 

FARM  AND  LAND  MANAGEMENT  RESEARCH 
Sherman  E.  Johnson,  Director 

PRODUCTION   ECONOMICS    RESEARCH   BRANCH 
Carl  P.  Heisig,  Chief 


Boston  Public  Library 
Superintendent  of  Documents 


JUL  1  7 1957 


^3I1J3HA3 


V'3 

ft,  f 


SUGGESTED  IDENTIFICATION 

U.  S.  Bureau  of  the  Census.      U.  S.  Census  of  Agriculture:  1954.     Vol.  Ill,  Special  Reports 

Part  9,  Farmers  and  Farm  Production  in  the  United  States. 

Chapter  I,  Wheat  Producers  and  Wheat  Production 

U.  S.  Government  Printing  Office,  Washington  25,  D.  C. ,  1956. 


For  sale  by  the  Superintendent  of  Documents,  U.  S.  Government  Printing  Office,  Washington  25,  D.  C. 
or  any  of  the  Field  Offices  of  the  Department  of  Commerce,  Price  30  cents  (paper  cover) 


PREFACE 


The  purpose  of  this  report,  is  to  present  an  analysis  of  the  characteristics  of  farmers  and  farm  production 
for  the  most  important  types  of  farms  as  shown  by  data  for  the  1954  Census  of  Agriculture.  The  analysis 
deals  with  the  relative  importance,  pattern  of  resource  use,  some  measures  of  efficiency,  and  problems  of 
adjustment  and  change  for  the  principal  types  of  farms. 

The  data  given  in  the  various  chapters  of  this  report  have  been  derived  largely  from  the  special  tabula- 
tion of  data  for  each  type  of  farm,  by  economic  class,  for  the  1954  Census  of  Agriculture.  The  detailed 
statistics  for  each  type  of  farm  for  the  United  States  and  the  principal  subregions  appear  in  Part  8  of  Volume 
III  of  the  reports  for  the  1954  Census  of  Agriculture. 

This  cooperative  report  was  prepared  under  the  direction  of  Ray  Hurley,  Chief  of  the  Agriculture  Divi- 
sion of  the  Bureau  of  the  Census,  U.  S.  Department  of  Commerce,  and  Kenneth  L.  Bachman,  Head,  Produc- 
tion, Income,  and  Costs  Section,  Production  Economics  Research  Branch,  Agricultural  Research  Service  of 
the  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture. 

Jackson  V.  McElveen,  Agricultural  Economist,  Production,  Income,  and  Costs  Section,  Production 
Economics  Research  Branch,  Agricultural  Research  Service  of  the  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture,  super- 
vised a  large  part  of  the  detailed  planning  and  analysis  for  the  various  chapters. 

The  list  of  chapters  and  the  persons  preparing  each  chapter  are  as  follows: 


Chapter  I Wheat     Producers     and 

Production 
A.  W.  Epp, 
University  of  Nebraska. 


Wheat 


and    Cotton 


Chapter  II Cotton    Producers 

Production 
Robert  B.  Glasgow, 
Production  Economics  Research 

Branch, 
Agricultural  Research  Service, 
United    States    Department    of 

Agriculture. 

Chapter  III Tobacco  and   Peanut   Producers 

and  Production 
R.  E.  L.  Greene, 
University  of  Florida. 

Chapter  IV Poultry  Producers   and    Poultry 

Production 
William  P.  Mortenson, 
University  of  Wisconsin. 

Chapter  V Dairy  Producers  and  Dairy  Pro- 
duction 
P.  E.  McNall, 
University  of  Wisconsin. 


Chapter  VI .  .    .    Western  Stock  Ranches  and  Live- 
stock Farms 
Mont  H.  Saunderson, 
Western    Ranching    and    Lands 

Consultant, 
Bozeman,  Mont. 

Chapter  VII .  .  Cash-grain  and  Livestock  Pro- 
ducers in  the  Corn  Belt 

Edwin  G.  Strand, 

Production  Economics  Research 
Branch, 

Agricultural  Research  Service, 

United  States  Department  of 
Agriculture. 

Chapter  VIII.  _   Part-time  Farming 
H.  G.  Halcrow, 
University  of  Connecticut. 

Chapter  IX Agricultural  Producers  and  Pro- 
duction in  the  United  States — 
A  General  View 
Jackson  V.  McElveen, 
Production   Economics  Research 

Branch, 
Agricultural  Research  Service, 
United    States    Department    of 
Agriculture. 


The  editorial  work  for  this  report  was  performed  by  Caroline  B.  Sherman,  and  the  preparation  of  the 
statistical  tables  was  supervised  by  Margaret  Wood. 


December  1956 


in 


UNITED  STATES  CENSUS  OF  AGRICULTURE:  1954 

REPORTS 

Volume  I. — Counties  and  State  Economic  Areas.  Statistics  for  counties  include  number  of  farms,  acreage,  value,  and  farm  operators; 
farms  by  color  and  tenure  of  operator;  facilities  and  equipment;  use  of  commercial  fertilizer;  farm  labor;  farm  expenditures;  livestock  and 
livestock  products;  specified  crops  harvested;  farms  classified  by  type  of  farm  and  by  economic  class;  and  value  of  products  sold  by  source. 

Data  for  State  economic  areas  include  farms  and  farm  characteristics  by  tenure  of  operator,  by  type  of  farm,  and  by  economic  class. 

Volume  I  is  published  in  33  parts. 

Volume  II. —  General  Report.  Statistics  by  Subjects,  United  States  Census  of  Agriculture,  1954.  Summary  data  and  analyses  of 
the  data  for  States,  for  Geographic  Divisions,  and  for  the  United  States  by  subjects. 


Volume  III. — Special  Reports 

Part  1. — Multiple-Unit  Operations.  This  report  will  be  similar  to 
Part.  2  of  Volume  V  of  the  reports  for  the  1950  Census  of  Agri- 
culture. It  will  present  statistics  for  approximately  900 
counties  and  State  economic  areas  in  12  Southern  States  and 
Missouri  for  the  number  and  characteristics  of  multiple-unit 
operations  and  farms  in  multiple  units. 

Part  2. — Ranking  Agricultural  Counties.  This  special  report  will 
present  statistics  for  selected  items  of  inventory  and  agricul- 
tural production  for  the  leading  counties  in  the  United  States. 

Part  3. — Alaska,  Hawaii,  Puerto  Rico,  District  of  Columbia,  and 
U.  S.  Possessions.  These  areas  were  not  included  in  the  1954 
Census  of  Agriculture.  The  available  current  data  from  vari- 
ous Government  sources  will  be  compiled  and  published  in 
this  report. 

Part  4. — Agriculture,  1954,  a  Graphic  Summary.  This  report  will 
present  graphically  some  of  the  significant  facts  regarding 
agriculture  and  agricultural  production  as  revealed  by  the  1954 
Census  of  Agriculture. 

Part  5. — Farm-Mortgage  Debt.  This  will  be  a  cooperative  study 
by  the  Agricultural  Research  Service  of  the  U.  S.  Department 
of  Agriculture  and  the  Bureau  of  the  Census.  It  will  present, 
by  States,  data  based  on  the  1954  Census  of  Agriculture  and  a 
special  mail  survey  conducted  in  January  1956,  on  the  num- 
ber of  mortgaged  farms,  the  amount,  of  mortgage  debt,  and  the 
amount  of  debt  held  by  principal  lending  agencies. 

Part  6. — Irrigation  in  Humid  Areas.  This  cooperative  report  by 
the  Agricultural  Research  Service  of  the  U.  S.  Department  of 
Agriculture  and  the  Bureau  of  the  Census  will  present  data  ob- 
tained by  a  mail  survey  of  operators  of  irrigated  farms  in  28 
States  on  the  source  of  water,  method  of  applying  water,  num- 
ber of  pumps  used,  acres  of  crops  irrigated  in  1954  and  1955, 
the  number  of  times  each  crop  was  irrigated,  and  the  cost  of 
irrigation  equipment  and  the  irrigation  system. 

Part  7. — Popular  Report  of  the  1954  Census  of  Agriculture.  This 
report  is  planned  to  be  a  general,  easy-to-read  publication  for 
the  general  public  on  the  status  and  broad  characteristics  of 
United  States  agriculture.  It  will  seek  to  delineate  such  as- 
pects of  agriculture  as  the  geographic  distribution  and  dif- 
ferences by  size  of  farm  for  such  items  as  farm  acreage,  princi- 
pal crops,  and  important  kinds  of  livestock,  farm  facilities, 
farm  equipment,  use  of  fertilizer,  soil  conservation  practices, 
farm  tenure,  and  farm  income. 

Part  8. — Size  of  Operation  by  Type  of  Farm.  This  will  be  a  coop- 
erative special  report  to  be  prepared  in  cooperation  with  the 
Agricultural  Research  Service  of  the  U.  S.  Department  of  Agri- 
culture.    This  report  will  contain  data  for  119  economic  sub- 

IV 


regions  (essentially  general  type-of-farming  areas)  showing  the 
general  characteristics  for  each  type  of  farm  by  economic  class. 
It  will  provide  data  for  a  current  analysis  of  the  differences 
that  exist  among  groups  of  farms  of  the  same  type.  It  will 
furnish  statistical  basis  for  a  realistic  examination  of  produc- 
tion of  such  commodities  as  wheat,  cotton,  and  dairy  products 
in  connection  with  actual  or  proposed  governmental  policies 
and  programs. 
Part  9. — Farmers  and  Farm  Production  in  the  United  States. 
The  purpose  of  this  report  is  to  present  an  analysis  of  the 
characteristics  of  farmers  and  farm  production  for  the  most 
important  types  of  farms  as  shown  by  data  for  the  1954  Census 
of  Agriculture.  The  analysis  deals  with  the  relative  importance, 
pattern  of  resource  use,  some  measures  of  efficiency,  and  prob- 
lems of  adjustment  and  change  for  the  principal  types  of  farms. 
The  report  was  prepared  in  cooperation  with  the  Agricultural 
Research  Service  of  the  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture. 

The  list  of  chapters   (published  separately   only)    and    title 
for  each  chapter  are  as  follows: 

Chapter  I — Wheat  Producers  and  Wheat  Production 
II — Cotton  Producers  and  Cotton  Production 
III — Tobacco  and  Peanut  Producers  and  Production 
IV — Poultry  Producers  and  Poultry  Production 

V — Dairy  Producers  and  Dairy  Production 
VI — Western  Stock  Ranches  and  Livestock  Farms 
VII — Cash-Grain  and  Livestock  Producers  in  the  Corn 
Bell 
VIII— Part-Time  Farming 
IX — Agricultural    Producers    and    Production    in    the 
United  States — A  General  View 
Part  10. — Use  of  Fertilizer  and  lime.    The  purpose  of  this  report 
is  to  present  in  one  publication  most  of  the  detailed  data  com- 
piled for  the  1954  Census  of  Agriculture  regarding  the  use  of 
fertilizer   and   lime.      The  report   presents   data   for   counties, 
State  economic  areas,   and  generalized  type-of-farming  areas 
regarding    the    quantity    used,    acreage    on    which    used,    and 
expenditures  for  fertilizer  and  lime.    The  Agricultural  Research 
Service  cooperated  with  the  Bureau  of  the  Census  in  the  prep- 
aration of  this  report. 
Part  11. — Farmers'  Expenditures.     This  report  presents   detailed 
data  on  expenditures  for  a  large  number  of  items  used  for  farm 
production   in    1955,   and  on   the  living  expenditures  of  farm 
operators'   families.     The   data   were   collected   and   compiled 
cooperatively  by  the  Agricultural    Marketing    Service    of   the 
U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  and  the  Bureau  of  the  Census. 
Part    12. — Methods   and   Procedures.     This  report  contains    an 
outline  and  a  description  of  the  methods  and  procedures  used 
in  taking  and  compiling  the  1954  Census  of  Agriculture. 


INTRODUCTION 


oo 

< 

< 
u 

o 

2 

o 

U 

w 

w 

H 

<: 
65 

Q 
2 
< 

(-0 

2 
O 

3 

a 

m 
D 

u 

1 

2 
O 
O 

w 


INTRODUCTION 


Purpose  and  scope. — American  agriculture  ia  exceedingly  diverse 
and  is  undergoing  revolutionary  changes.  Farmers  and  their 
families  obtain  their  income  by  producing  a  large  variety  of 
products  under  a  large  variety  of  conditions  as  well  as  from  sources 
other  than  farming.  The  organization  of  production,  type  of 
farming,  productivity,  income,  expenditures,  size,  and  character- 
istics of  operators  of  the  4.8  million  farms  in  the  United  States 
vary  greath  .  Agriculture  has  been  a  dynamic,  moving,  adjusting 
part  of  our  economy.  Basic  changes  in  farming  have  been  occurring 
and  will  continue  to  be  necessary.  Adjustments  brought  by  tech- 
nological change,  by  changing  consumer  wants,  by  growth  of 
population,  and  by  changes  in  the  income  of  nonfarm  people,  have 
been  significant  forces  in  changing  agriculture  since  World  War  II. 
The  transition  from  war  to  an  approximate  peacetime  situation 
has  also  made  it  necessary  to  reduce  the  output  of  some  farm 
products.  Some  of  the  adjustments  in  agriculture  have  not  pre- 
sented relatively  difficult  problems  as  they  could  be  made  by  the 
transfer  of  resources  from  the  production  of  one  product  to  another. 
Others  require  substantial  shifts  in  resources  and  production. 

Moreover,  a  considerable  number  of  farm  families,  many  of  whom 
are  employed  full  time  in  agriculture,  have  relatively  low  incomes. 
Most  of  these  families  operate  farms  that  are  small  when  compared 
with  farms  that  produce  higher  incomes.  The  acreage  of  land  and 
the  amount  of  capital  controlled  by  the  operators  of  these  small 
farms  are  too  small  to  provide  a  very-  high  level  of  income.  In 
recent  years,  many  farm  families  on  these  small  farms  have  made 
adjustments  by  leaving  the  farm  to  earn  their  incomes  elsewhere, 
by  discontinuing  their  farm  operations,  and  by  earning  more  non- 
farm  income  while  remaining  on  the  farm  or  on  the  place  they 
farmed  formerly. 

One  objective  of  this  report  is  to  describe  and  analyze  some  of 
the  existing  differences  and  recent  adjustments  in  the  major  types 
of  farming  and  farm  production.  For  important  commodities  and 
groups  of  farms,  the  report  aims  to  make  available,  largely  from 
the  detailed  data  for  the  1954  Census  of  Agriculture  but  in  a  more 
concise  form,  facts  regarding  the  size  of  farms,  capital,  labor,  and 
land  resources  on  farms,  amounts  and  sources  of  farm  income  and 
expenditures,  combinations  of  crop  and  livestock  enterprises, 
adjustment  problems,  operator  characteristics,  and  variation  in  use 
of  resources  and  in  size  of  farms  by  areas  and  for  widely  differing 
production  conditions.  Those  types  of  farms  on  which  production 
of  surplus  products  is  important  have  been  emphasized.  The 
report  will  provide  a  factual  basis  for  a  better  understanding  of 
the  widespread  differences  among  farms  in  regard  to  size,  resources, 
and  income.  It  will  also  provide  a  basis  for  evaluating  the  effects 
of  existing  and  proposed  farm  programs  on  the  production  and 
incomes  of  major  types  and  classes  of  farms. 

Income  from  nonfarm  sources  is  important  on  a  large  number 
of  farms.  About  1.4  million  of  the  4.8  million  farm-operator 
families,  or  about  3  in  10,  obtain  more  income  from  off-farm  sources 
than  from  the  sale  of  agricultural  products.  More  than  three- 
fourths  of  a  million  farm  operators  live  on  small-scale  part-time 
farms  and  ordinarily  are  not  dependent  on  farming  as  the  main 
source  of  family  income.  These  part-time  farmers  have  a  quite 
different  relation  to  adjustments,  changes,  and  farm  problems 
than  do  commercial  farmers.  A  description  of  and  facts  regarding 
these  part-time  farms  and  the  importance  of  nonfarm  income  for 
commercial  farms  are  presented  in  Chapter  8. 


Except  for  Chapter  8,  this  report  deals  with  commercial  farms 
(see  economic  class  of  farm).  The  analysis  is  limited  to  the  major 
types  of  agricultural  production  and  deals  primarily  with  geo- 
graphic areas  in  which  each  of  the  major  types  of  agricultural 
production  has  substantial  significance. 

Source  of  data. — Most  of  the  data  presented  in  this  report  are 
from  special  compilations  made  for  the  1954  Census  of  Agriculture, 
although  pertinent  data  from  research  findings  and  surveys  of  the 
U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture,  State  Agricultural  Colleges,  and 
other  agencies  have  been  used  to  supplement  Census  data.  The 
detailed  Census  data  used  for  this  report  are  contained  in  Part  8  of 
Volume  III  of  the  reports  of  the  1954  Census  of  Agriculture. 
Reference  should  be  made  to  that  report  for  detailed  explanations 
and  definitions  and  statements  regarding  the  characteristics  and 
reliability  of  the  data. 

Areas  for  which  data  are  presented. — Data  are  presented  in 
this  report  primarily  for  selected  economic  subregions  and  for  the 
United  States.  The  boundaries  of  the  119  subregions  used  for  the 
compilation  of  data  on  which  this  report  is  based  are  indicated  by 
the  map  on  page  vi.  These  subregions  represent  primarily  general 
type-of-farming  areas.  Many  of  them  extend  into  two  or  more 
States.  (For  a  more  detailed  description  of  economic  subregions, 
see  the  publication  "Economic  Subregions  of  the  United  States, 
Series  Census  BAE;  No.  19,  published  cooperatively  by  the  Bureau 
of  the  Census,  and  the  Bureau  of  Agricultural  Economics,  U.  S. 
Department  of  Agriculture,  July  1953.) 

DEFINITIONS  AND  EXPLANATIONS 

Definitions  and  explanations  are  given  only  for  some  of  the  more 
important  items.  For  more  detailed  definitions  and  explanations, 
reference  can  be  made  to  Part  8  of  Volume  III  and  to  Volume  II  of 
the  reports  of  the  1954  Census  of  Agriculture. 

A  farm. — For  the  1954  Census  of  Agriculture,  places  of  3  or 
more  acres  were  counted  as  farms  if  the  annual  value  of  agricultural 
products,  exclusive  of  home-garden  products,  amounted  to  $150 
or  more.  The  agricultural  products  could  have  been  either  for 
home  use  or  for  sale.  Places  of  less  than  3  acres  were  counted  as 
farms  only  if  the  annual  value  of  sales  of  agricultural  products 
amounted  to  $150  or  more.  Places  for  which  the  value  of  agricul- 
tural products  for  1954  was  less  than  these  minima  because  of  crop 
failure  or  other  unusual  conditions,  and  places  operated  at  the  time 
of  the  Census  for  the  first  time  were  counted  as  farms  if  normally 
they  could  be  expected  to  produce  these  minimum  quantities  of 
agricultural  products. 

All  the  land  under  the  control  of  one  person  or  partnership  was 
included  as  one  farm.  Control  may  have  been  through  ownership, 
or  through  lease,  rental,  or  cropping  arrangement. 

Farm  operator. — A  "farm  operator"  is  a  person  who  operates 
a  farm,  either  performing  the  labor  himself  or  directly  supervising 
it.  He  may  be  an  owner,  a  hired  manager,  or  a  tenant,  renter,  or 
sharecropper.  If  he  rents  land  to  others  or  has  land  cropped  for 
him  by  others,  he  is  listed  as  the  operator  of  only  that  land  which 
he  retains.  In  the  case  of  a  partnership,  only  one  partner  was 
included  as  the  operator.  The  number  of  farm  operators  is  con- 
sidered the  same  as  the  number  of  farms. 


VIII 


FARMERS  AND  FARM  PRODUCTION 


Farms  reporting  or  operators  reporting. — Figures  for  farms 
reporting  or  operators  reporting,  based  on  a  tabulation  of  all  farms, 
represent  the  number  of  farms,  or  farm  operators,  for  which  the 
specified  item  was  reported.  For  example,  if  there  were  11,922 
farms  in  a  subregion  and  only  11,465  had  chickens  over  4  months 
old  on  hand,  the  number  of  farms  reporting  chickens  would  be 
1 1 ,465.  The  difference  between  the  total  number  of  farms  and  the 
number  of  farms  reporting  an  item  represents  the  number  of  farms 
not  having  that  item,  provided  the  inquiry  was  answered 
completely  for  all  farms. 

Farms  by  type. — The  classification  of  commercial  farms  by 
type  was  made  on  the  basis  of  the  relationship  of  the  value  of 
sales  from  a  particular  source,  or  sources,  to  the  total  value  of  all 
farm  products  sold  from  the  farm.  In  some  cases,  the  type  of 
farm  was  determined  on  the  basis  of  the  sale  of  an  individual  farm 
product,  such  as  cotton,  or  on  the  basis  of  the  sales  of  closely  re- 
lated products,  such  as  dairy  products.  In  other  cases,  the  type 
of  farm  was  determined  on  the  basis  of  sales  of  a  broader  group  of 
products,  such  as  grain  crops  including  corn,  sorghums,  all  small 
grains,  field  peas,  field  beans,  cowpeas,  and  soybeans.  In  order  to 
be  classified  as  a  particular  type,  sales  or  anticipated  sales  of  a 
product  or  group  of  products  had  to  represent  50  percent  or  more 
of  the  total  value  of  products  sold. 

The  types  of  commercial  farms  for  which  data  are  shown,  to- 
gether with  the  product  or  group  of  products  on  which  the  classi- 
fication is  based  are: 


Type  of  farm 
Cash-grain 


Cotton 

Other  field-crop_ 


Vegetable 

Fruit-and-nut_ 


Dairv. 


Poultry. 


Livestock  farms  other  than 
dairy  and  poultry. 


Product  or  group  of  products  amount- 
ing to  50  percent  or  more  of  the 
value  of  all  farm  products  sold 
Corn,   sorghum,  small  grains,  field 
peas,    field   beans,    cowpeas,  and 
soybeans. 
Cotton  (lint  and  seed). 
Peanuts,     Irish     potatoes,     sweet- 
potatoes,  tobacco,  sugarcane,  sug- 
ar   beets    for   sugar,    and    other 
miscellaneous  crops. 
Vegetables. 
Berries  and  other  small  fruits,  and 

tree  fruits,  nuts,  and  grapes. 
Milk  and  other  dairy  products. 
The  criterion  of  50  percent  of  the 
total  sales  was  modified  in  the 
case  of  dairy  farms.  A  farm  for 
which  the  value  of  sales  of  dairy 
products  represented  less  than  50 
percent  of  the  total  value  of  farm 
products  sold  was  classified  as  a 
dairy  farm  if — 

(a)  Milk  and  other  dairy  prod- 
ucts accounted  for  30 
percent  or  more  of  the 
total  value  of  products 
sold,  and 
(6)  Milk  cows  represented  50 
percent  or  more  of  all 
cows,  and 
(c)  Sales  of  dairy  products,  to- 
gether with  the  sales 
of  cattle  and  calves, 
amounted  to  50  percent 
or  more  of  the  total 
value  of  farm  products 
sold. 
Chickens,  eggs,  turkeys,  and  other 

poultry  products. 
Cattle,   calves,  hogs,  sheep,  goats, 
wool,  and  mohair,   provided  the 
farm  did  not  qualify  as  a  dairy 
farm. 


Product  or  group  of  products  amount- 
ing  to  50   percent  or  more  of  the 
Type  of  farm  value  of  all  farm  products  sold 

General Farms    were    classified   as    general 

when  the  value  of  products  from 
one  source  or  group  of  sources 
did  not  represent  as  much  as  50 
percent  of  the  total  value  of  all 
farm  products  sold.  Separate 
figures  are  given  for  three  kinds 
of  general  farms: 

(a)  Primarily  crop. 

(b)  Primarily  livestock, 

(c)  Crop  and  livestock. 

Primarily  crop  farms  are  those  for 
which  the  sale  of  one  of  the 
following  crops  or  groups  of 
crops — vegetables,  fruits  and 
nuts,  cotton,  cash  grains,  or  other 
field  crops — did  not  amount  to 
50  percent  or  more  of  the  value 
of  all  farm  products  sold,  but 
for  which  the  value  of  sales  for 
all  these  groups  of  crops  repre- 
sented 70  percent  or  more  of  the 
value  of  all  farm  products  sold. 

Primarily  livestock  farms  are  those 
which  could  not  qualify  as  dairy 
farms,  poultry  farms,  or  livestock 
farms  other  than  dairy  and 
poultry,  but  on  which  the  sale 
of  livestock  and  poultry  and 
livestock  and  poultry  products 
amounted  to  70  percent  or  more 
of  the  value  of  all  farm  products 
sold. 

General  crop  and  livestock  farms  are 
those  which  could  not  be  classi- 
fied as  either  crop  farms  or  live- 
stock farms,  but  on  which  the 
sale  of  all  crops  amounted  to  at 
least  30  percent  but  less  than  70 
percent  of  the  total  value  of  all 
farm  products  sold. 

Miscellaneous This  group  of  farms  includes  those 

that  had  50  percent  or  more  of 
the  total  value  of  products  ac- 
counted for  by  sale  of  horticul- 
tural products,  or  sale  of  horses, 
or  sale  of  forest  products. 

Farms  by  economic  class. — A  classification  of  farms  by  eco- 
nomic class  was  made  for  the  purpose  of  segregating  groups  of 
farms  that  are  somewhat  alike  in  their  characteristics  and  size  of 
operation.  This  classification  was  made  in  order  to  present  an 
accurate  description  of  the  farms  in  each  class  and  in  order  to 
provide  basic  data  for  an  analysis  of  the  organization  of  agriculture. 

The  classification  of  farms  by  economic  class  was  made  on  the 
basis  of  three  factors;  namely,  total  value  of  all  farm  products 
sold,  number  of  days  the  farm  operator  worked  off  the  farm,  and 
the  relationship  of  the  income  received  from  nonfarm  sources  by 
the  operator  and  members  of  his  family  to  the  value  of  all  farm 
products  sold.  Farms  operated  by  institutions,  experiment  sta- 
tions, grazing  associations,  and  community  projects  were  classified 
as  abnormal,  regardless  of  any  of  the  three  factors. 

For  the  purpose  of  determining  the  code  for  economic  class  and 
type  of  farm,  it  was  necessary  to  obtain  the  total  value  of  farm 
products  sold  as  well  as  the  value  of  some  individual  products 
sold. 

The  total  value  of  farm  products  sold  was  obtained  by  adding 
the  reported  or  estimated  values  for  all  products  sold  from  the 
farm.  The  value  of  livestock,  livestock  products  except  wool  and 
mohair,  vegetables,  nursery  and  greenhouse  products,  and  forest 


INTRODUCTION 


IX 


products  was  obtained  by  the  enumerator  from  the  farm  operator 
for  each  farm.  The  enumerator  also  obtained  from  the  farm 
operator  the  quantity  sold  for  corn,  sorghums,  small  grains,  hays, 
and  small  fruits.  The  value  of  sales  for  these  crops  was  obtained 
by  multiplying  the  quantity  sold  by  State  average  prices. 

The  quantity  sold  was  estimated  for  all  other  farm  products. 
The  entire  quantity  produced  for  wool,  mohair,  cotton,  tobacco, 
sugar  beets  for  sugar,  sugarcane  for  sugar,  broomcorn,  hops,  and 
mint  for  oil  was  estimated  as  sold.  To  obtain  the  value  of  each 
product  sold,  the  quantity  sold  was  multiplied  by  State  average 
prices. 

In  making  the  classification  of  farms  by  economic  class,  farms 
were  grouped  into  two  major  groups,  namely,  commercial  farms 
and  other  farms.  In  general,  all  farms  with  a  value  of  sales  of 
farm  products  amounting  to  $1,200  or  more  were  classified  as 
commercial.  Farms  with  a  value  of  sales  of  $250  to  $1,199  were 
classified  as  commercial  only  if  the  farm  operator  worked  off  the 
farm  less  than  100  days  or  if  the  income  of  the  farm  operator  and 
members  of  his  family  received  from  nonfarm  sources  was  less  than 
the  total  value  of  all  farm  products  sold. 

Land  in  farms  according  to  use. — Land  in  farms  was  classified 
according  to  the  use  made  of  it  in  1954.  The  classes  of  land 
are  mutually  exclusive,  i.  e.,  each  acre  of  land  was  included  only 
once  even  though  it  may  have  had  more  than  one  use  during  the 
year. 

The  classes  referred  to  in  this  report  are  as  follows: 

Cropland  harvested. — This  includes  land  from  which  crops 

were  harvested;  land  from  which  hay  (including  wild  hay)  was 

cut;  and  land  in  small  fruits,  orchards,  vineyards,  nurseries,  and 

greenhouses.     Land  from  which  two  or  more  crops  were  reported 

as  harvested  was  to  be  counted  only  once. 

Cropland  used  only  for  pasture. — In  the  1954  Census,  the 
enumerator's  instructions  stated  that  rotation  pasture  and  all 
other  cropland  that  was  used  only  for  pasture  were  to  be  in- 
cluded under  this  class.  No  further  definition  of  cropland 
pastured  was  given  the  farm  operator  or  enumerator.  Per- 
manent open  pasture  may,  therefore,  have  been  included  under 
this  item  or  under  "other  pasture,"  depending  on  whether  the 
enumerator  or  farm  operator  considered  it  as  cropland. 

Cropland  not  harvested  and  not  pastured. — This  item  includes 
idle  cropland,  land  in  soil-improvement  crops  only,  land  on 
which  all  crops  failed,  land  seeded  to  crops  for  harvest  after 
1954,  and  cultivated  summer  fallow. 

In  the  Western  States,  this  class  was  subdivided  to  show 
separately  the  acres  of  cultivated  summer  fallow.  In  these 
States,  the  acreage  not  in  cultivated  summer  fallow  represents 
largely  crop  failure.  There  are  very  few  counties  in  the  West- 
ern States  in  which  there  is  a  large  acreage  of  idle  cropland  or 
in  which  the  growing  of  soil-improvement  crops  is  an  important 
use  of  the  land. 

In  the  States  other  than  the  Western  States,  this  general 
class  was  subdivided  to  show  separately  the  acres  of  idle  crop- 
land (not  used  for  crops  or  for  pasture  in  1954).  In  these  States, 
the  incidence  of  crop  failure  is  usually  low.  It  was  expected 
that  the  acreage  figure  that  excluded  idle  land  would  reflect 
the  acreage  in  soil-improvement  crops.  However,  the  1954 
crop  year  was  one  of  low  rainfall  in  many  Eastern  and  Southern 
States  and,  therefore,  in  these  areas  the  acreage  of  cropland  not 
harvested  and  not  pastured  includes  more  land  on  which  all 
crops  failed  than  would  usually  be  the  case. 

Cultivated  summer  fallow. — This  item  includes  cropland 
that  was  plowed  and  cultivated  but  left  unseeded  for  several 
months  to  control  weeds  and  conserve  moisture.  No  land 
from  which  crops  were  harvested  in  1954  was  to  be  included 
under  this  item. 

Cropland,  total. — This  includes  cropland  harvested,  cropland 
used  only  for  pasture,  and  cropland  not  harvested  and  not 
pastured. 

Land  pastured,  total. — This  includes  cropland  used  only  for 
pasture,  woodland  pastured,  and  other  pasture  (not  cropland 
and  not  woodland). 


Woodland,    total. — This    includes    woodland    pastured    and 

woodland  not  pastured. 

Value  of  land  and  buildings. — The  value  to  be  reported  was 
the  approximate  amount  for  which  the  land  and  the  buildings  on 
it  would  sell. 

Off-farm  work  and  other  income. — Many  farm  operators  receive 
a  part  of  their  income  from  sources  other  than  the  sale  of  farm 
products  from  their  farms.  The  1954  Agriculture  Questionnaire 
included  several  inquiries  relating  to  work  off  the  farm  and  non- 
farm  income.  These  inquiries  called  for  the  number  of  days 
worked  off  the  farm  by  the  farm  operator;  whether  other  members 
of  the  operator's  family  worked  off  the  farm;  and  whether  the 
farm  operator  received  income  from  other  sources,  such  as  sale 
of  products  from  land  rented  out,  cash  rent,  boarders,  old  age 
assistance,  pensions,  veterans'  allowances,  unemployment  com- 
pensation, interest,  dividends,  profits  from  nonfarm  business, 
and  help  from  other  members  of  the  operator's  family.  Another 
inquiry  asked  whether  the  income  of  the  operator  and  his  family 
from  off-farm  work  and  other  sources  was  greater  than  the  total 
value  of  all  agricultural  products  sold  from  the  farm  in  1954. 
Off-farm  work  was  to  include  work  at  nonfarm  jobs,  businesses, 
or  professions,  whether  performed  on  the  farm  premises  or  else- 
where; also,  work  on  someone  else's  farm  for  pay  or  wages.  Ex- 
change work  was  not  to  be  included. 

Specified  facilities  and  equipment. — Inquiries  were  made  in 
1954  to  determine  the  presence  or  absence  of  selected  items  on 
each  place  such  as  (1)  telephone,  (2)  piped  running  water,  (3) 
electricity,  (4)  television  set,  (5)  home  freezer,  (6)  electric  pig 
brooder,  (7)  milking  machine,  and  (8)  power  feed  grinder.  Such 
facilities  or  equipment  were  to  be  counted  even  though  tem- 
porarily out  of  order.  Piped  running  water  was  defined  as  water 
piped  from  a  pressure  system  or  by  gravity  flow  from  a  natural 
or  artificial  source.  The  enumerator's  instructions  stated  that 
pig  brooders  were  to  include  those  heated  by  an  electric  heating 
element,  by  an  infrared  or  heat  bulb,  or  by  ordinary  electric  bulbs. 
They  could  be  homemade. 

The  number  of  selected  types  of  other  farm  equipment  was  also 
obtained  for  a  sample  of  farms.  The  selected  kinds  of  farm 
equipment  to  be  reported  were  (1)  grain  combines  (for  harvesting 
and  threshing  grains  or  seeds  in  one  operation);  (2)  cornpickers; 
(3)  pickup  balers  (stationary  ones  not  to  be  reported);  (4)  field 
forage  harvesters  (for  field  chopping  of  silage  and  forage  crops) ; 
(5)  motortrucks;  (6)  wheel  tractors  (other  than  garden);  (7) 
garden  tractors;  (8)  crawler  tractors  (tracklaying,  caterpillar); 
(9)  automobiles;  and  (10)  artificial  ponds,  reservoirs,  and  earth 
tanks. 

Wheel  tractors  were  to  include  homemade  tractors  but  were  not 
to  include  implements  having  built-in  power  units  such  as  self- 
propelled  combines,  powered  buck  rakes,  etc.  Pickup  and  truck- 
trailer  combinations  were  to  be  reported  as  motortrucks.  School 
buses  were  not  to  be  reported,  and  jeeps  and  station  wagons  were 
to  be  included  as  motortrucks  or  automobiles,  depending  on 
whether  used  for  hauling  farm  products  or  supplies,  or  as  passenger 
vehicles. 

Farm  labor. — The  farm-labor  inquiries  for  1954,  called  for  the 
number  of  persons  doing  farmwork  or  chores  on  the  place  during 
a  specified  calendar  week.  Since  starting  dates  of  the  1954  enumer- 
ation varied  by  areas  or  States,  the  calendar  week  to  which  the 
farm-labor  inquiries  related  varied  also.  The  calendar  week  was 
September  26-October  2  or  October  24-30.  States  with  the 
September  26-October  2  calendar  week  were:  Arizona,  California, 
Colorado,  Connecticut,  Florida,  Idaho,  Kansas,  Kentucky, 
Louisiana,  Maine,  Massachusetts,  Michigan,  Minnesota,  Montana, 
Nebraska,  Nevada,  New  Hampshire,  New  Jersey,  New  Mexico, 


423018—57 2 


FARMERS  AND  FARM  PRODUCTION 


New  York,  North  Dakota,  Oklahoma,  Oregon,  Pennsylvania, 
Rhode  Island,  South  Dakota,  Tennessee,  Texas,  Utah,  Vermont, 
Washington,  Wisconsin,  and  Wyoming.  States  with  the  October 
24-30  calendar  week  were:  Alabama,  Arkansas,  Delaware,  Georgia, 
Illinois,  Indiana,  Iowa,  Maryland,  Mississippi,  Missouri,  North 
Carolina,  Ohio,  South  Carolina,  Virginia,  and  West  Virginia. 
Farmwork  was  to  include  any  work,  chores,  or  planning  necessary 
to  the  operation  of  the  farm  or  ranch  business.  Housework, 
contract  construction  work,  and  labor  involved  when  equipment 
was  hired  (custom  work)  were  not  to  be  included. 

The  farm-labor  information  was  obtained  in  three  parts: 
(1)  Operators  working,  (2)  unpaid  members  of  the  operator's  family 
working,  and  (3)  hired  persons  working.  Operators  were  consid- 
ered as  working  if  they  worked  1  or  more  hours;  unpaid  members 
of  the  operator's  family,  if  they  worked  15  or  more  hours;  and 
hired  persons,  if  they  worked  any  time  during  the  calendar  week 
specified.  Instructions  contained  no  specifications  regarding  age 
of  the  persons  working. 

Regular  and  seasonal  workers. — Hired  persons  working  on 
the  farm  during  the  specified  week  were  classed  as  "regular" 
workers  if  the  period  of  actual  or  expected  employment  was  150 
days  or  more  during  the  year,  and  as  "seasonal"  workers  if  the 
period  of  actual  or  expected  employment  was  less  than  150  days. 
If  the  period  of  expected  employment  was  not  reported,  the 
period  of  employment  was  estimated  for  the  individual  farm 
after  taking  into  account  such  items  as  the  basis  of  payment, 
wage  rate,  expenditures  for  labor  in  1954,  and  the  type  and 
other  characteristics  of  the  farm. 

Specified  farm  expenditures. — The  1954  Census  obtained  data 
for  selected  farm  expense  items  in  addition  to  those  for  fertilizer 
and  lime.  The  expenditures  were  to  include  the  total  specified 
expenditures  for  the  place  whether  made  by  landlord,  tenant,  or 
both. 

Expenditures  for  machine  hire  were  to  include  any  labor  in- 
cluded in  the  cost  of  such  machine  hire.  Machine  hire  refers  to 
custom  machine  work  such  as  tractor  hire,  threshing,  combining, 
silo  filling,  baling,  ginning,  plowing,  and  spraying.  If  part  of  the 
farm  products  was  given  as  pay  for  machine  hire,  the  value  of  the 
products  traded  for  this  service  was  to  be  included  in  the  amount 
of  expenditures  reported.  The  cost  of  trucking,  freight,  and 
express  was  not  to  be  included. 

Expenditures  for  hired  labor  were  to  include  only  cash  pay- 
ments. Expenditures  for  housework,  custom  work,  and  contract 
construction  work  were  not  to  be  included. 

Expenditures  for  feed  were  to  include  the  expenditures  for 
pasture,  salt,  condiments,  concentrates,  and  mineral  supplements, 
as  well  as  those  for  grain,  hay,  and  mill  feeds.  Expenditures  for 
grinding  and  mixing  feeds  were  also  to  be  included.  Payments 
made  by  a  tenant  to  his  landlord  for  feed  grown  on  the  land  rented 
by  the  tenant  were  not  to  be  included. 

Expenditures  for  gasoline  and  other  petroleum  fuel  and  oil  were 
to  include  only  those  used  for  the  farm  business.  Petroleum 
products  used  for  the  farmer's  automobile  for  pleasure  or  used 
exclusively  in  the  farm  home  for  heating,  cooking,  and  lighting 
were  not  to  be  included. 

Crops  harvested. — The  information  on  crops  harvested  refers 
to  the  acreage  and  quantity  harvested  for  the  1954  crop  year.  An 
exception  was  made  for  land  in  fruit  orchards  and  planted  nut 
trees.  In  this  case,  the  acreage  represents  that  in  both  bearing 
and  nonbearing  trees  and  vines  as  of  October  and  November  1954. 

Hay. — The  data  for  hay  includes  all  kinds  of  hay  except  soy- 
bean, cowpea,  sorghum,  and  peanut  hay. 

Livestock  and  poultry. — The  data  on  the  number  of  livestock 
and  poultry  represent  the  number  on  hand  on  the  day  of  enumera- 


tion (October-November  1954).  The  data  relating  to  livestock 
products  and  the  number  of  livestock  sold  relate  to  the  sales  made 
during  the  calendar  year  1954. 

LABOR  RESOURCES 

The  data  for  labor  resources  available  represent  estimates  based 
largely  on  Census  data  and  developed  for  the  purpose  of  making 
comparisons  among  farms  of  various  size  of  operations.  The 
labor  resources  available  are  stated  in  terms  of  man-equivalents. 

To  obtain  the  man-equivalents  the  total  number  of  farm  opera- 
tors as  reported  by  the  1954  Census  were  adjusted  for  estimated 
man-years  of  work  off  the  farm  and  for  the  number  of  farm  opera- 
tors 65  years  old  and  over.  The  farm  operator  was  taken  to  rep- 
resent a  full  man-equivalent  of  labor  unless  he  was  65  years  or 
older  or  unless  he  worked  at  an  off-farm  job  in  1954. 

The  man-equivalent  estimated  for  farm  operators  reporting  spec- 
ified amounts  of  off-farm  work  were  as  follows: 

Estimated 
Days  worked  off  the  farm  in  1954  man-equivalent 

1-99  davs .  0.85 

100-199  days .  50 

200  days  and  over .  15 

The  man-equivalent  for  farm  operators  65  years  of  age  and  older 
was  estimated  at  0.5. 

Man-equivalents  of  members  of  the  farm  operator's  family  were 
based  upon  Census  data  obtained  in  response  to  the  question 
"How  many  members  of  your  family  did  15  or  more  hours  of  farm 
work  on  this  place  the  week  of  September  26-October  2  (or,  in 
some  areas,  the  week  of  October  24-30)  without  receiving  cash 
wages?"  Each  family  worker  was  considered  as  0.5  man-equiva- 
lent. This  estimate  provides  allowance  for  the  somewhat  higher 
incidence  of  women,  children,  and  elderly  persons  in  the  unpaid 
family  labor  force. 

In  addition,  the  number  of  unpaid  family  workers  who  were 
reported  as  working  15  or  more  hours  in  the  week  of  September 
26-October  2  was  adjusted  to  take  account  of  seasonal  changes  in 
farm  employment.  Using  published  and  unpublished  findings  of 
the  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture  and  State  Agricultural  Col- 
leges, and  depending  largely  upon  knowledge  and  experience  with 
the  geographic  areas  and  type  of  farming,  each  author  deter- 
mined the  adjustment  factor  needed  to  correct  the  number  of 
family  workers  reported  for  the  week  of  September  26-October  2 
to  an  annual  average  basis. 

Man-equivalents  of  hired  workers  are  based  entirely  upon  the 
expenditure  for  cash  wages  and  the  average  wage  of  permanent 
hired  laborers  as  reported  in  the  1954  Census  of  Agriculture. 

Value  of  or  investment  in  livestock. — Numbers  of  specified 
livestock  and  poultry  in  each  subregion  were  multiplied  by  a 
weighted  average  value  per  head.  The  average  values  were  com- 
puted from  data  compiled  for  each  kind  of  livestock  for  the  1954 
Census  of  Agriculture.  The  total  value  does  not  include  the  value 
of  goats.  (For  a  description  of  the  method  of  obtaining  the  value 
of  livestock,  see  Chapter  VI  of  Volume  II  of  the  reports  for  the 
1954  Census  of  Agriculture.) 

Value  of  investment  in  machinery  and  equipment. — The  data 
on  value  of  investment  in  machinery  and  equipment  were  developed 
for  the  purpose  of  making  broad  comparisons  among  types  and 
economic  classes  of  farms  and  by  subregions.  Numbers  of  specified 
machines  on  farms,  as  reported  by  the  Census,  were  multiplied  by 
estimated  average  value  per  machine.  Then  the  total  values  ob- 
tained were  adjusted  upward  to  provide  for  the  inclusion  of  items 
of  equipment  not  included  in  the  Census  inventory  of  farm 
machinery. 


INTRODUCTION 


XI 


The  estimates  for  average  value  of  specified  machines  and  the 
proportion  of  total  value  of  all  machinery  represented  by  the 
value  of  these  machines  were  based  largely  on  published  and  un- 
published data  from  the  "Farm  Costs  and  Returns"  surveys  con- 
ducted currently  by  the  Agricultural  Research  Service,  U.  S. 
Department  of  Agriculture.1  Modifications  were  made  as  needed 
in  the  individual  chapters  on  the  basis  of  State  and  local  studies. 
The  total  estimated  value  of  all  machinery  for  all  types  and 
economic  classes  of  farms  is  approximately  equal  to  the  value  of 
all  machinery  as  estimated  by  the  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture. 

Value  of  farm  products  sold,  or  gross  sales. — Data  on  the 
value  of  the  various  farm  products  sold  were  obtained  for  1954  by 
two  methods.  First,  the  values  of  livestock  and  livestock  prod- 
ucts sold,  except  wool  and  mohair;  vegetables  harvested  for  sale; 
nursery  and  greenhouse  products;  and  forest  products  were 
obtained  by  asking  each  farm  operator  the  value  of  sales.  Second, 
the  values  of  all  other  farm  products  sold  were  computed.  For  the 
most  important  crops,  the  quantity  sold  or  to  be  sold  was  obtained 
for  each  farm.  The  entire  quantity  harvested  for  cotton  and 
cottonseed,  tobacco,  sugar  beets  for  sugar,  hops,  mint  for  oil,  and 
sugarcane  for  sugar  was  considered  sold.  The  quantity  of  minor 
crops  sold  was  estimated.  The  value  of  sales  for  each  crop  was 
computed  by  multiplying  the  quantity  sold  by  State  average 
prices.  In  the  case  of  wool  and  mohair,  the  value  of  sales  was 
computed  by  multiplying  the  quantity  shorn  or  clipped  by  the 
State  average  prices. 

Gross  sales  include  the  value  of  all  kinds  of  farm  products  sold. 
The  total  does  not  include  rental  and  benefit,  soil  conservation, 
price  adjustment,  Sugar  Act,  and  similar  payments.     The  total 


does  include  the  value  of  the  landlord's  share  of  a  crop  removed 
from  a  farm  operated  by  a  share  tenant.  In  most  of  the  tables, 
detailed  data  are  presented  for  only  the  more  important  sources 
of  gross  sales  and  the  total  for  the  individual  farm  products 
or  sources  will  not  equal  the  total  as  the  values  for  the  less  impor- 
tant sources  or  farm  products  have  been  omitted.  (For  a  detailed 
statement  regarding  the  reliability  and  method  of  obtaining  the 
value  of  farm  products  sold,  reference  should  be  made  to  Chapter 
IX  of  Volume  II  of  the  reports  for  the  1954  Census  of  Agriculture.) 

Livestock  and  livestock  products  sold. — The  value  of  sales  for 
livestock  and  livestock  products  includes  the  value  of  live  animals 
sold,  dairy  products  sold,  poultry  and  poultry  products  sold,  and 
the  calculated  value  of  wool  and  mohair.  The  value  of  bees, 
honey,  fur  animals,  goats,  and  goat  milk  is  not  included. 

The  value  of  dairy  products  includes  the  value  of  whole  milk  and 
cream  sold,  but  does  not  include  the  value  of  butter  and  cheese, 
made  on  the  farm,  and  sold.  The  value  of  poultry  and  products 
includes  the  value  of  chickens,  broilers,  chicken  eggs,  turkeys, 
turkey  eggs,  ducks,  geese,  and  other  miscellaneous  poultry  and 
poultry  products  sold.  The  value  does  not  include  the  value 
of  baby  chicks  sold. 

Crops  sold. — Vegetables  sold  includes  the  value  of  all  vegetables 
harvested  for  sale,  but  does  not  include  the  value  of  Irish  potatoes 
and  sweet  potatoes. 

The  value  of  all  crops  sold  includes  the  value  of  all  crops  sold 
except  forest  products.  The  value  of  field  crops  sold  includes  the 
value  of  sales  of  all  crops  sold  except  vegetables,  small  fruits  and 
berries,  fruits,  and  nuts. 


i  Farm  Costs  and  Returns,  19.i5  (with  comparisons),  Agriculture  Information  Bulletin  No.  168,  Agricultural  Research  Service,  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture,  June  1956. 


CHAPTER  I 
WHEAT  PRODUCERS  AND  WHEAT  PRODUCTION 


CONTENTS 


Page 

Introduction 5 

Classes  of  wheat 7 

Wheat -production  regions 8 

Importance  of  major  wheat  regions 9 

The  hard  red  winter  wheat  region 10 

Size  of  business 11 

Crop  and  livestock  organization 12 

Labor  used 13 

Farm  mechanization  and  home  conveniences 14 

Gross  farm  income 14 

Farm  expenses 15 

Efficiency  levels  of  farm    operation 16 

Other  types  of  farming  in  the  hard  red  winter  wheat  region.  17 

The  hard  red  spring  wheat  region 17 

Size  of  business 10 

( 'rop  and  livestock  organization 19 

Labor  used 21 


Page 
The  hard  red  spring  wheat  region — Continued 

Farm  mechanization  and  home  conveniences  22 

Gross  farm  income 22 

Farm  expenses 23 

Efficiency  levels  of  farm  operation 24 

Other  types  of  farming  in  the  hard  red  spring  wheat  region.  25 

The  white  wheat  region  (subregion  110) 25 

Size  of  business 20 

Crop  and  livestock  organization 26 

Labor  used 27 

Farm  mechanization  and  home  conveniences.-  27 

Gross  farm  income 27 

Farm  expenses 27 

Efficiency  levels  of  farm  operation 28 

Recent  changes  by  major  wheat  regions 28 

Soft  red  winter  wheat 29 

Wheat  production  in  other  western  regions 30 

Smile  production  problems  of  wheat  farmers 30 


CHARTS  AND  MAPS 


All  wheat  threshed,  acreage.  Idol 

Acres  of  all  wheat  harvested  as  a  percent  of  total  cropland. 
Census  of  1954 

Wheat:   Disappearance,  United  States,  1935-1955 

Average  annual  precipitation.    _    .        


Page 
5 


Cultivated  summer  fallow,  acreage,  1954 

All  wheat  acreage,  by  regions,  1954 

The  hard  winter  wheat  area,  subregions  93,  94,  and  103,.. 
The  hard  spring  wheat  area,  subregions  89,  90,  91,  and  105- 
The  white  wheat  area,  subregion  110    


Pagt 

7 

8 

10 

17 

25 


TABLES 

Table 

1. — Total  and  per-capita  consumption  of  wheat  for  food  in  the  United  States:    1910  to  1954 

2. — Acreage,  production,  and  value  of  wheat  in  the  United  States:    1910  to  1954 

3. — Estimated  supply  and  domestic  use  of  wheat  by  classes:    1954—55 

4. — Number  of  commercial  farms,  percentage  growing  wheat,  and  percentage  classified  as  cash-grain,  major  producing  regions:   1954  _ 
5. — Percentage  of  farms  reporting  wheat  sold  and  of  the  quantity  of  wheat  sold  for  cash-grain  and  other  farms  for  major  wheat 

regions :    1954 

6. — Percentage  of  resources  used  and  value  of  gross  sales  for  all  commercial  farms  represented  by  cash-grain  farms  for  major  wheat 

regions:   1954 

7. — Number  of  farms  and  resources  used  on  cash-grain  farms  in  the  major  wheat  regions:   1954   

8. — Number  of  commercial  farms  and  specified  characteristics  per  farm,  for  major  wheat  regions  and  the  United  States:    1954 

9. — Size  of  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  93,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 

10. — Size  of  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  94,  by  economic  class  of  farm:    1954 

11. — Size  of  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  103,  by  economic  class  of  farm:    1954 

12. — Percentage  distribution  of  cash-grain  farms  and  of  wheat  production  in  the  hard  winter  wheat  region,   by  economic  class  of 

farm:    1954 

13. — Land  use  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  91!,  by  economic  class  of  farm:    1954 

14. — Land  use  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  94,  by  economic  class  of  farm:    1954     

15. — Land  use  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  103,  by  economic  class  of  farm:    1954 

16. — Livestock  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  93,  by  economic  class  of  farm:    1954 

17. — Livestock  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  94,  by  economic  class  of  farm:    1954 

18. — Livestock  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  103,  by  economic  class  of  farm:    1954 

19. — Labor  force  on  cash-grain  farms  in  the  hard  red  winter  wheat  region,  and  for  subregion  93  by  economic  class  of  farm:  1954. _ 
20. — Farm  mechanization  and  home  conveniences  on  cash-grain  farms  in  the  hard  red  winter  wheat  region,  and  for  subregion  94  by 

economic  class  of  farm:    1954 

21. — Sources  of  farm  income  on   cash-grain  farms  in  the  hard  red   winter  wheat  region,  and   for  subregion  94  by   economic  class   of 

f  arm :   1 954 

22. — Specified  farm  expenditures  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  93,  by  economic  class  of  farm:    1954 

23. — Specified  farm  expenditures  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  94,  by  economic  class  of  farm:    1954 

24. — Specified  farm  expenditures  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  103,  by  economic  class  of  farm:    1954 


Page 

6 

i 

8 

8 


9 
•I 
9 
11 
1  1 
11 

12 
12 
12 
12 
13 
13 
13 
14 

14 

15 
15 
15 
15 


4  CONTENTS 

TABLES— Continued 

Table  Pw 

25. — Use  of  commercial  fertilizer  on  cash-grain  farms  in  the  hard  red  winter  wheat  region,  by  economic  class  of  farm:    1954 16 

26. — Selected  measures  of  income  and  efficiency  levels  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  93,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 16 

27. — Selected  measures  of  income  and  efficiency  levels  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  94,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 16 

2g. — Selected  measures  of  income  and  efficiency  levels  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  103,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 16 

29. — Acreage  and  production  of  grain  sorghum,  by  States,  in  the  major  producing  States:   1954 17 

30. — A  comparison  of  the  cash-grain  farms  in  the  hard  winter  and  hard  spring  wheat  subregions:   1954 18 

31 — Sjze  of  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  89,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 19 

32. — Size  of  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  90,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 19 

33. — SiZe  of  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  91,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 19 

34. — Size  of  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  105,  by  economic  class  of  farm:  1954 19 

35. — Percent  distribution  of  cash-grain  farms  and  wheat  produced,  by  economic  class  for  the  hard  spring  wheat  region:   1954 19 

36. — Land  use  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  89,  bv  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 20 

37. — Land  use  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  90,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954___ 20 

38. — Land  use  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  91,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 20 

39. — Land  use  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  105,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 20 

40. — Livestock  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  89,  by  economic  class  of  farm :   1 954 20 

41. — Livestock  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  90,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 21 

42. — Livestock  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  91,  by  economic  class  of  faim:   1954 21 

43. — Livestock  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  105,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 21 

44. — Labor  force  on  cash-grain  farms  in  the  hard  spring  wheat  region,  and  for  subregion  90  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 21 

45. — Farm  mechanization  and  home  conveniences  on  cash-grain  farms  in  the  hard  spring  wheat  region,  and  for  subregion  91  by 

economic  class  of  farm:  1954 22 

46. — Sources  of  farm  income  on  cash-grain  farms  in  the  hard  spring  wheat  region,  and  for  subregion  105  by  economic  class  of  farm: 

1954 22 

4". — Specified  farm  expenditures  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  89,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 23 

48. — Specified  farm  expenditures  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  90,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 23 

49. — Specified  farm  expenditures  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  91,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 23 

50. — Specified  farm  expenditures  on  cash-grain  farms  m  subregion  105,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 23 

51. — Use  of  commercial  fertilizer  on  cash-grain  farms  in  the  hard  spring  wheat  region,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 24 

52. — Selected  measures  of  income  and  efficiency  levels  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  89,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 24 

53. — Selected  measures  of  income  and  efficiency  levels  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  90,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 24 

54. — Selected  measures  of  income  and  efficiency  levels  on  cash-gram  farms  in  subregion  91,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 24 

55. — Selected  measures  of  income  and  efficiency  levels  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  105,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 24 

56. — Acreage  and  production  of  flax  in  the  three  leading  producing  States:   1954 25 

57. — Size  of  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  110,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 26 

58. — Land  use  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  110,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 26 

59. — Livestock  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  110,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 26 

60. — Labor  force  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  110,  by  economic  class  of  farm:  1954 27 

61. — Farm  mechanization  and  home  conveniences  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  110,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 27 

62. — Sources  of  farm  income  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  110,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954. 27 

63. — Specified  farm  expenditures  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  110,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 27 

64. — Use  of  commercial  fertilizer  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  110,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 28 

65. — Selected  measures  of  income  and  efficiency  levels  on  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  110,  by  economic  class  of  farm:   1954 28 

66. — A  comparison  of  some  items  for  organization,  expenses,  and  home  facilities  for  cash-grain  farms  in  the  hard  winter  wheat  region : 

1954  and  1949 2S 

67. — A  comparison  of  some  items  for  organization,  expenses,  and  home  facilities  for  cash-grain  farms  in  the  hard  spring  wheat  region: 

1954  and  1949 28 

68.- — A  comparison  of  some  items  for  organization,  expenses,  and  home  facilities  for  cash-grain  farms  in  the  white  wheat  region: 

1954  and  1949 29 

69. — Wheat  production  in  selected  States  in  the  soft  red  winter  wheat  area:    1954 30 

70. — Changes  in  size  of  farm  in  counties  which  are  typical  of  the  various  wheat  regions:    1910-1954 — 30 

71. — Annual  precipitation  (inches  of  rainfall)  at  representative  weather  stations  in  the  (ireat  Plains  wheat  area:   1931-52 31 


WHEAT   PRODUCERS   AND   WHEAT   PRODUCTION 

A.  W.  Epp 


INTRODUCTION 

American  wheat  producers  represent  an  important  and  distinct 
segment  of  ortr  agricultural  economy.  Nearly  a  million  of  the  4.8 
million  farmers  in  the  United  States  produce  some  wheat.  Some 
wheat  is  grown  in  all  States  (see  fig.  1),  and  in  1954,  it  occupied 
51.4  million  acres  or  15.4  percent  of  the  cropland  harvested.  It- 
relative  importance  in  various  areas  is  shown  by  the  proportion  of 
cropland  occupied  by  wheat  (see  fig.  2).  Total  wheat  production 
has  approximated  1  billion  bushels  or  more  in  each  of  the  last  15 
years  with  a  peak  production  of  1,359  million  bushels  in  1947. 
The  1954  crop  of  909  million  bushels  had  a  farm  value  of  $1,940 
million.  This  was  approximately  8  percent  of  gross  farm  sales  in 
the  United  States. 

Two-thirds  of  the  wheat  is  grown  on  relatively  specialized  farms 
on  which  wheat  is  the  major  product.  These  farms  are  particu- 
larly affected  by  changes  in  weather  conditions  and  in  economic 
programs  that  affect  wheat.  Operators  of  cash-grain  farms  har- 
vesting wheat  used  34  million  acres  of  cropland  or  10.7  percent  of 
the  United  States  total,  in  the  production  of  wheat  in  1954.  They 
had  invested  $25.7  billion  in  land,  buildings,  livestock,  and  ma- 
chinery, or  about  23  percent  of  the  total  capital  investment  in 
agriculture.  These  wheat  farmers  used  13  percent  of  the  total 
agricultural  labor  force. 

In  addition,  many  other  farmers  with  diversified  types  of 
farming  use  a  part  of  their  resources  to  produce  some  wheat. 


;r 

ALL  WHEAT   THRESHED 

ACREAGE.  1954 

• 

\       m       i^'(y* 

UNITED 
5 

STATES  TOTAL                                                                              1       -'"""-.- 
.361.664                                                                     ;•          •••'-                                   V 

S         7               1  DOT. 10.000  ACRES           1         1 

5          """"'T'. ......    l 

Figure  1. 

Public  interest  in  wheat  producers  is  stimulated  by  the  demand- 
supply  situation  in  wheat  and  the  difficulties  of  making  necessary 
adjustments.  The  major  concern  in  agricultural  programs  and 
price  policy  for  wheat  growers  for  more  than  30  years  has  been  the 
problem  of  adjusting  the  quantity  produced  to  the  quantity  con- 
sumed (see  fig.  3). 


ACRES  OF  ALL  WHEAT  HARVESTED  AS  A  PERCENT  OF  TOTAL  CROPLAND 

CENSUS  OF  1954 

(COUNTY    UNIT    BASIS) 


,   DEPARTMENT     OF     COMMERCE 


UAP  NO    A54       44 


6UREAU    OF    THE     CENSUS 


Figure  2  . 


423018 — 57 3 


FARMERS  AND  FARM  PRODUCTION 


WHEAT:  DISAPPEARANCE,   UNITED  STATES,   1935-1955 


1945 

year  beginning  july 
Figure  3. 


Food  habits  have  changed  over  the  years.  The  American  people 
have  reduced  their  consumption  of  the  starchy  foods  such  as  bread 
and  potatoes.  The  annual  consumption  of  wheat  has  declined 
from  310  pounds  per  capita  in  1910  to  173  pounds  in  1954,  but  the 


increase  in  population  has  offset  this  decrease  so  that  total  con- 
sumption has  remained  rather  constant.     (See  table  1.) 

Wheat  is  tolerant  of  a  wide  range  of  growing  conditions.  Ideal 
conditions  for  wheat  production  are  a  deep,  fertile,  fine-textured 
soil,  cool  temperatures  and  ample  rainfall  during  the  growing 
season,  with  warm  dry  weather  during  the  final  period  of  maturing 
and  harvest.  Wheat  plants  respond  readily  to  favorable  moisture 
conditions  but  will  survive  and  produce  grain  with  as  little  as  10 
inches  of  rainfall.  Most  wheat  is  grown  in  areas  of  less  than  50 
inches  annual  rainfall.  When  wheat  is  grown  in  areas  of  less  than 
20  inches  of  yearly  precipitation,  it  is  a  common  practice  to 
summer-fallow  at  least  a  part  of  the  wheatland.  The  purpose  of 
fallowing  is  to  kill  weeds,  to  keep  the  surface  in  as  permeable 
condition  as  possible  for  the  absorption  of  water,  and  help  to  con- 
trol wind  erosion.  Many  wheat  growers  in  the  low-rainfall  areas 
have  half  of  their  cropland  in  wheat  and  the  other  half  in  fallow. 
A  comparison  of  figures  1,  4,  and  5  will  show  the  relation  of  annual 
precipitation  and  summer-fallowing  to  the  areas  of  wheat  pro- 
duction. 

Table  1. — Total  and   Per-Capita  Consumption  of  Wheat 
for  Food  in  the  United  States:  '  1910  to  1954 


Year 

Total 

Per  capita 

Year 

Total 

Per  capita 

Million 
bushels 
478 
466 
506 

Pounds 
310 
259 
243 

1940   . 

Millions 

bushels 

484 

481 

474 

Pounds 

217 

1920 

1930 

1950 

1954 

186 

173 

Source:  Agricultural  Marketing  Service,  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture. 


100* 

I 


t\ 


AVERAGE   ANNUAL   PRECIPITATION 


,/, 


ZZ&X 


c' 


A~l 


7*"*%-^. 


A. 


Under  10  inchct 
10  to  20  ntehet 
20  to  30  tnchci 
30  to  40  mcha 
40  to  SO  inehta 
50  lo  60 
<0  to  80  inchM 
80  to  100 
Oer  100  inches 


EXPLANATION 


■~<£  n  fr 

jTV^' Vj I  'J/?      ]~  ~J  Under  10  .nchn 

]Tj  10  to  15  'ncnei 

[  ]  15  13  20  'nchn 

^  TO  to  30  >nct*t 

I  '   /" ]  30  lo  80  inches 

gg£2  SO  inclm  and  ove' 


eoCAKCD    It    0URF.AU    OF    RCCLAHATtOM 

reoM  «a»  metiveo  ■»  tmc  u  »  •mhh» 

•U»[AU,   OCeAKTMCNT    0'     AfiRlCULTUKI 


Ace  r*>  3S-9    eta. 


Figure  4. 


WHEAT  PRODUCERS  AND  WHEAT  PRODUCTION 


CULTIVATED  SUMMER  FALLOW 

I,  1954 


Figure  5. 

The  adaptation  of  wheat  to  a  wide  range  of  climatic  conditions 
also  contributes  to  the  difficulty  of  limiting  the  supply.  Acreage 
reductions  in  recognized  commercial  wheat  areas  may  be  offset  by 
increases  in  wheat  acreage  in  other  areas  where  it  can  be  grown 
fairly  successfully. 

The  lack  of  production  alternatives  in  the  major  wheat  regions 
intensifies  the  difficulty  of  adjusting  supply  to  demand.  There  are 
few  good  alternative  uses  for  the  land.  It  is  difficult  to  get  grasses 
established,  and  if  a  shift  to  livestock  production  is  undertaken, 
the  income  is  often  reduced  and  any  increase  in  the  total  farm 
income  may  be  delayed  for  several  years. 

There  is  great  variation  in  the  acreage  planted  to  wheat.  It  has 
varied  from  50  million  to  S4  million  acres  during  the  last  45  years. 
The  harvested  acreage  is  somewhat  less  because  of  abandonment. 
Each  year  some  seeded  wheat  acreage  is  abandoned  because  con- 
ditions are  unfavorable  for  its  growth.  Winterkill  because  of 
drought  conditions  is  the  most  frequent  cause. 

The  production  fluctuates  as  well  as  the  acreage  seeded.  The 
average  yield  in  the  United  States  has  varied  from  12  to  IV)  bushels 
per  acre  harvested.  On  a  seeded-acre  basis,  yields  dropped  as  low 
as  8  bushels  during  several  years  of  the  drought  of  the  1930's.  The 
acreage  harvested,  yield,  production,  and  value  of  the  wheat  crop 
during  nearly  50  years  are  shown  in  table  4.  Production  has 
varied  from  as  low  as  526  million  to  a  high  of  1,359  million  bushels. 
Obviously,  the  fluctuation  in  acreage  planted  and  in  yield  per  acre 
results  in  considerable  variation  in  annual  production. 

In  recent  years  wheat  supplies  have  been  increasing.  The  supply 
of  wheat  in  the  United  States  by  source  is  as  follows,  for  the  5 
years,  1950-54: 


Item 

1950 

1951 

1952 

1953 

1954 

Production 

Mil.  bu. 

1,019 

12 

425 

Mil.  bu. 
981 
32 
396 

Mil.  bu. 

1,299 

21 

256 

Mil.  bu. 

1,170 

6 

562 

MU.  bu. 

970 
4 

902 

1,456 

1,409 

1,576 

1,738 

1,876 

Stocks  of  wheat  have  accumulated  so  that  we  now  have  practi- 
cally 2  years'  total  requirements  on  hand  at  the  beginning  of 
each  harvest.  A  part  of  the  problem  of  oversupply  rises  out  of  the 
extent  of  the  acreage  seeded  to  wheat  in  response  to  wartime 
demand.     During  both  World  War  I  and  World  War  II  adequate 


supplies  of  food  were  essential.  Prices  of  wheat  and  other  foods 
increased  rapidly.  Farmers  responded  by  plowing  up  grassland 
and  increasing  the  wheat  acreage  by  thousands  of  acres.  The  re- 
adjustment of  this  acreage  to  normal  demands  for  wheat  is  more 
difficult  than  the  expansion.  In  the  Great  Plains  area  it  is  difficult 
and  costly  to  establish  grass  on  cropland.  A  few  years  of  good 
grain  crops  and  high  prices  raise  the  hopes  of  farmers  for  high 
profits  from  wheat,  and  make  them  reluctant  to  seed  the  land  to 
grass. 

In  1954  farmers  voted  in  favor  of  marketing  quotas.  Carryover 
stocks  of  wheat  had  mounted  from  a  quarter  of  a  billion  bushels  in 
1952  to  nearly  a  billion  bushels  in  July  1954.  Continued  produc- 
tion at  existing  levels  was  not  consistent  with  market  demand 
conditions  and  price  supports  of  more  than  $2  per  bushel  for  wheat. 
Largely,  as  a  result  of  acreage  controls  and  marketing  quotas,  wheat 
acreage  harvested  was  reduced  from  (i8  million  in  1953  to  less  than 
55  million  in  1954.  Farmers  again  voted  in  favor  of  marketing 
quotas  in  1955  and  1956. 

Table  2. — Acreage,  Production,  and  Value  of  Wheat  in 
the  United  States:  1910  to  1954  ' 


Year 

Harvested 
acreage 

Yield  per 
acre 

Production 

Average 
price 

Farm  value 

1954 

1953 

1952 

1951.-- 

1950 

Thousands 
53, 712 
67,  661 
Til,  926 
i.l.  192 
61,610 

75, 910 
65, 167 
53, 273 
62,637 
62, 358 
45,  793 

Bushels 
18.1 
17.3 

18.3 
16.0 
16.5 

14.5 
17.0 
15.3 
14.2 
13.5 
13.7 

Million 

busheh 

970 

1,169 

1,  299 

981 

1,019 

1.098 
1,108 
815 
887 
843 
625 

Per  bushel 
$2.13 
2.04 
2.09 
2.11 
2.00 

1.S8 
1.50 
.68 
.67 
1.83 
.91 

Million 

dollars 
$2, 063 
2,385 
2,714 
2.074 
2,042 

2,062 

1949..- 

1945 

1940 

1930 

1920 

1910 

556 

595 

1,541 

568 

i  Agricultural  Statistics,  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture. 

CLASSES  OF  WHEAT 

Wheat  is  not  the  homogeneous  product  implied  in  some  of 
the  discussion  of  the  problems  of  wheat  farmers  and  farm  pro- 
grams. Several  distinct  classes  of  wheat  are  produced  in  this 
country.  Each  class  is  grown  for  a  specific  use,  and  is  used  in  a 
limited  number  of  products.  The  classes  vary  in  their  charac- 
teristics. Although  there  is  a  considerable  overlapping  in  pro- 
duction areas,  the  classes  of  wheat  are  grown  in  fairly  distinct 
areas.  To  a  large  extent  the  class  produced  in  an  area  is  greatly 
influenced  by  the  climatic  conditions. 

Hard  red  winter  and  hard  red  spring  wheats  differ  mainly  in 
their  habits  of  growth.  In  the  areas  where  either  kind  can  be 
grown,  winter  wheat  usually  produces  a  higher  yield.  These 
hard  wheats  are  commonly  used  for  the  kind  of  bread  flour  that 
requires  a  high-protein  grain.  Flour  from  soft  red  wheat  is 
especially  suited  for  baking  biscuits,  pastry,  and  cakes,  as  these 
products  require  flour  with  a  relatively  low  protein  content. 

White  wheat,  grown  in  the  western  and  northeastern  parts  of 
the  United  States,  is  a  soft  wheat;  it  is  used  for  pastries  and  cereals. 
Durum  wheat  is  a  very  hard  wheat  that  is  grown  in  the  spring 
wheat  regions.  It  makes  a  very  tough  dough  used  in  making 
macaroni,  spaghetti,  vermicelli,  and  noodles.  Red  durum  wheat 
is  grown  mainly  for  livestock  feed.  The  supply  and  distribution 
of  wheat  by  classes  is  shown  in  table  3. 


FARMERS  AND  FARM  PRODUCTION 


WHEAT  PRODUCTION  REGIONS 

Wheat  production  in  the  United  States  can  be  separated  into 
two  general  production  situations.  In  the  western  half  of  the 
country  there  are  extensive  areas  of  specialized  cash-grain  farm- 
ing where  wheat  is  the  dominant  crop  (see  fig.  6).  While  some 
wheat  is  grown  in  all  of  the  Western  States,  production  is  concen- 
trated in  three  major  regions.  These  three  major  regions,  char- 
acterized by  specialization  and  large  acreages  of  wheat,  account 
for  about  half  of  the  total  production  of  wheat.  Nearly  all  of 
this  production  occurs  on  commercial  farms.  In  addition,  some 
wheat  is  grown  in  other  scattered  areas  of  the  West. 

In  the  eastern  half  of  the  United  States  wheat  is  generally  a 
minor  farm  enterprise.  Here  wheat  usually  is  grown  in  a  diversi- 
fied type  of  farming  where  wheat  typically  is  a  minor  source  of 
income. 


ALL   WHEAT  ACREAGE,  BY   REGIONS,   1954 


HtTE     WHEAT 
£  HARD  RED  SPRING 

3  HARD  RED  WINTER 

4  SOFT  RED  WINTER 


Figure  6. 

Table  3.- — Estimated  Supply  and  Domestic  Use  of   Wheat 
by  Classes:  1954-55  > 


Class 

Supply 

Domestic 
use 

Million 

bushels 

1,018 

271 

338 

10 

254 

Million 
bushels 
225 

Soft  rod  winter 

159 

140 

8 

White 

55 

•  12  months  beginning  July  1,  1954. 

Source:  Agricultural  Marketing  Service,  U.  S.  Department  of  Agriculture. 

In  this  report,  soft  winter  wheat  production  in  the  eastern 
half  of  the  United  States  is  covered  in  less  detail.  Very  few  of 
the  producers  there  would  be  classified  as  wheat  farmers  and  data 
are  not  available  to  show  how  much  of  the  capital  and  labor  is 
used  on  these  wheat-producing  farms.  But  these  areas  taken 
together  produce  almost  a  fourth  of  the  wheat  in  the  United 
States. 

Wheat  production  in  the  three  major  wheat  areas  in  the  western 
half  of  the  United  Slates  can  be  described  as  an  extensive,  highly 
mechanized  type  of  agriculture. 

Areas  of  production  for  the  major  classes  of  wheat  are  shown  in 
figure  6.  Along  the  boundaries  between  two  of  the  areas,  there  is 
considerable  overlapping  in  the  classes  grown.  Winter  wheat 
has  been  pushing  farther  north  as  more  winter-hardy  varieties 
have  been  developed.  The  boundary  between  hard  and  soft 
winter  wheat  is  not  a  distinct  line  but  rather  a  belt-  in  which  both 
classes  are  found. 


The  hard  winter  wheat  area  lies  in  the  southern  Great  Plains 
extending  from  Texas  to  southern  Nebraska  and  from  the  Corn 
Belt  to  the  Rocky  Mountains.  Subregions  93,  94,  and  103  com- 
prise nearly  all  the  hard  winter  wheat  area  and  the  data  for  these 
three  subregions  are  used  to  represent  the  total  for  this  area. 
Practically  all  of  the  wheat  produced  in  these  three  subregions 
is  hard  winter  wheat. 

The  hard  spring  wheat  area  extends  from  northern  Nebraska 
to  the  Canadian  border  and  from  the  Red  River  Valley  in  Minne- 
sota to  western  Montana.  It  includes  subregions  89,  90,  91, 
and  105.  The  total  for  these  4  subregions  is  used  to  represent 
the  total  for  this  area.  This  area  produces  both  winter  and 
spring  wheat,  although  the  latter  is  far  more  extensive.  This  terri- 
tory lies  too  far  north  for  winter  wheat  except  on  the  southern 
border  and  in  protected  areas  in  Montana. 

The  white  wheat  area  is  found  in  southwestern  Washington  and 
northern  Oregon,  extending  slightly  into  Idaho.  The  data  for 
this  subregion  are  used  as  the  total  for  this  area.  Here  both 
spring  and  winter  wheat  are  grown,  but  winter  wheat  predomi- 
nates. 

Table  4. — Number  of  Commercial  Farms,  Percentage 
Growing  Wheat,  and  Percentage  Classified  as  Cash- 
Grain,  Major  Producing  Regions:  1954 


Cash-grain  farms 

Number 

Percent 
of  com- 

of com- 

mercial 

Average 

Item 

mercial 

farms 

Percent 

Percent 

wheat 

farms 

growing 

Number 

of  com- 

growing 

acreage 

wheat 

mercial 

wheat 

per  cash- 

for  sale 

farms 

for  sale 

grain 
farm 

Major  wheat  regions: 

Hard  winter  wheat . 

127.  971 

79.9 

75,  544 

59.0 

93.7 

168.7 

Hard  spring  wheat.. 

104,  378 

90.8 

61,427 

58.9 

100.0 

150.4 

White  wheat 

14,  551 

83.8 

9,109 

62.6 

100.0 

244.0 

Other  regions: 

West  of  98th  parallel- 

403,  703 

23.2 

48,  524 

12.0 

72.1 

140.8 

East  of9Slh  parallel. 

2,  677,  286 

18.3 

343,  370 

12.8 

46.7 

27.8 

Table  5. — Percentage  of  Farms  Reporting  Wheat  Sold  and 
of  the  Quantity  of  Wheat  Sold  for  Cash-Grain  and 
Other  Farms  for  Major  Wheat  Regions:  1954 


Region  and  type  of  farm 


Major  Wheat  Regions 

Hard  winter  wheat: 

Cash-grain  farms 

Other  commercial  farms 

Other  farms 

Hard  spring  wheat: 

C  ash  -grain  farms 

Other  commercial  farms 

Other  farms 

White  wheat: 

Cash-grain  farms 

Other  commercial  farms 

Other  farms 

Other  Regions 

West  of  the  98th  parallel: 

Cash-grain  farms 

Other  commercial  farms 

Other  farms 

East  of  the  98th  parallel: 

Cash-grain  farms 

Other  commercial  farms 

Other  farms 


Percentage 
of  farms  pro- 
ducing wheat 
for  sale 


93.7 
60.0 
15.3 


100.0 
69.6 
19.0 


72.1 
16.6 
2.4 

46.7 
14.1 
2.5 


Percentage  of 

total  wheat 

sold  in  the 

United  States 


21.0 
4.6 
0.1 


(z) 


13.2 
2.4 


m 


10.1 
0.3 


5.3 

0.1 

14.9 
17.3 
0.6 


z  0.05  percent  or  less. 


WHEAT  PRODUCERS  AND  WHEAT  PRODUCTION 


IMPORTANCE  OF  MAJOR  WHEAT  REGIONS 

The  proportion  of  the  agricultural  resources  of  farmers  on 
commercial  farms  used  by  cash-grain  farmers  in  three  western 
\\  heat-producing  regions  is  shown  in  table  6.  Cash-grain  farmers 
are  those  who  receive  at  least  50  percent  of  their  income  from  the 
sale  of  grain.  Other  commercial  farmers  get  more  of  their  income 
from  sources  other  than  grain.  Cash-grain  farmers  in  the  three 
major  wheat  regions  have  54  percent  of  all  land  and  70  percent  of 
all  cropland.  They  use  62  percent  of  all  capital  employed  in 
agriculture,  55  percent  of  all  the  farm  labor  force,  and  produce 
59  percent  of  all  farm  products  sold  in  the  three  major  wheat 
regions. 

The  adaptation  of  the  wheat  plant  to  a  wide  range  of  soil  and 
climatic  conditions  helps  to  explain  why  wheat  is  grown  extensively 
in  the  three  major  wheat  regions.  In  the  more  productive  areas 
of  the  Corn  Belt,  farmers  find  corn  more  profitable  as  a  major  crop 
and  give  it  first  consideration,  even  though  the  yields  of  wheat  in 
the  Corn  Belt  are  higher  than  the  yields  in  the  Great  Plains.  In 
the  Corn  Belt,  wheat  is  grown  only  because  it  combines  well  with 
other  farm  enterprises.  In  earlier  years,  wheat  was  grown  ex- 
tensively in  the  Eastern  States  and  in  the  Corn  Belt,  but  in  recent 
decades  corn  and  other  feed  grains  have  pushed  wheat  production 
into  areas  less  favorable  for  corn  production. 

Table  6. — Percentage  of  Resources  Used  and  Value  of 
Gross  Sales  for  all  Commercial  Farms  Represented  by 
Cash-Grain  Farms  for  Major  Wheat  Regions:  1954 


Region 

All  land 

Crop- 
land 

Capital 
invest- 
ment 

Labor 
force 
(man- 
equiva- 
lent) 

dross 
sales 

Total,  3  major  regions 

54 

50 
55 
72 

70 

67 
68 
92 

62 

60 
60 

82 

55 

55 
55 
62 

59 
53 

Hard  spring  wheat 

62 

78 

When  examined  in  terms  of  total  units  and  value,  the  resources 
used  by  the  wheat  farmers  in  these   specialized  wheat-producing 


regions  loom  large.  The  hard  winter  wheat  region  ranks  high  in 
number  of  wheat  farms,  acres  of  wheat,  wheat  production,  and 
total  investment.  It  leads  all  other  regions  in  total  production  of 
wheat.  The  146,000  cash-grain  farmers  in  the  three  regions 
produced  approximately  45  percent  of  all  wheat  raised  in  the 
United  States  in  1954.  They  used  nearly  $9  billion  in  capital 
investment  and  the  equivalent  of  190,000  men.      (See  table  7.) 

Table  7- — Number  of  Farms  and  Resources  Used  on  Cash- 
,  Grain  Farms  in  the  Major  Wheat  Regions:  1954 


Item 

Unit 

Hard 
winter 

wheat 

Hard 
spring 

wheat 

White 
wheat 

Total,  3 
regions 

Total  farms 

Number .. 

Thousands . 

do 

75,  544 
30,  962 
12,  029 
183,  690 

371 
654 

3,768 
208 
696 

4,672 

91,041 

61,  427 
33.  493 
10,  132 
121,816 

231 
480 

1,900 
182 
717 

2,799 

82,  833 

9,109 

7,219 

2,586 

84, 065 

175 
238 

1,033 

27 

166 

1,226 

14,  755 

146. 080 

71.1.71 

24,  747 

Thousands  of 
bushels. 

do 

389,  571 

777 

1,372 

Investment  in— 

.     do 

6.701 

Livestock 

do 

....  do 

417 
1,579 

Total 

do 

8,697 

Number. ..     .  . 

188,  629 

A  comparison  of  wheat  farmers  among  regions  and  with  the 
average  of  all  commercial  farmers  in  the  United  States  is  shown 
on  a  per-farm  basis  in  table  8.1  Compared  with  the  United 
States  average,  wheat  farmers  are  large  operators.  They  use 
2  to  4  times  as  much  land  and  V,i  to  5  times  as  much  capital  as  the 
average  farmer  in  the  United  States,  but  need  only  slightly  more 
than  the  average  of  man-labor  because  of  the  high  degree  of 
mechanization. 

Marked  differences  among  regions  are  found  in  the  acreage 
and  amount  of  investment  in  commercial  cash-grain  farms.  The 
producers  of  white  wheat  have  the  largest  farms  and  the  largest 
investment  per  farm.  The  producers  of  hard  winter  wheat  exceed 
those  in  the  hard  spring  wheat  area  in  amount  of  resources  other 
than  land. 


Table  8. — Number  of  Commercial  Farms  and  Specified  Characteristics  per  Farm, 

the  United  States:  1954 


for  Major  Wheat  Regions  and 


Number  of 
farms 

All  land 
in  farms 
(acres) 

Total  crop- 
land 
(acres) 

Labor  foree 

(man- 
equivalent) 

Total  in- 
vestment 

(dollars) 

Investment  in 

Region  and  type  of  farm 

Land  and 
buildings 
(dollars) 

Machinery 
(dollars) 

Livestock 
(dollars) 

Gross  sales 
(dollars) 

3,  327.  889 
127,  971 
75,  544 
62,427 

104.  378 
61,427 
42,  951 

14,  551 
9, 109 
5,442 

310 
656 
558 

797 

821 
771 
892 

1,034 

1.188 

776 

138 
359 
410 
285 

471 
545 
365 

540 
793 

118 

1.5 
1.3 
1.2 
1.5 

1.4 
1.3 
1.6 

1.6 

1.6 

1.6 

32,  874 

53,  904 

54,  956 
52,388 

41,426 
42.  281 
40.  203 

92,  428 
120.  910 
45,514 

25,  429 
48,  593 
50,  038 
46,  422 

28, 646 
30,  979 
25,  262 

85,  481 
99.  206 
32,  523 

4.291 
8.818 
9,210 

8,  252 

11,212 
11,619 
10,632 

14,307 
18,  244 
7,718 

3,154 
4,046 
2,749 
5,914 

4,749 
2,964 
7,302 

3,853 
3,005 
5,272 

7,302 

9,600 

8,656 

10,  961 

7,469 

7,815 

6,974 

20,982 

Cash-grain  farms . 

26.  088 
12,  435 

1  Comparison  based  on  cash-grain  farms  in  major  wheat  regions.    Wheat  is  the  principal  cash  grain  produced  on  most  of  these  farms. 


10 


FARMERS  AND  FARM  PRODUCTION 


The  wheat  regions  previously  outlined  are  discussed  separately 
on  the  following  pages.  When  reference  is  made  to  other  than  the 
cash-grain  farmers  in  the  wheat  regions  the  fact  is  indicated. 

The  number  of  cash-grain  farmers  and  the  percentage  of  total 
wheat  production  of  each  major  region  are  as  follows: 

Percentage 


A  rea 

Hard  winter  wheat 

Hard  spring  wheat 

White  wheat 


THE  HARD  RED  WINTER  WHEAT  REGION 

Wheat  production  is  most  highly  concentrated  in  subregions  93, 
94,  and  103  (see  fig.  7).  A  similar  area  extends  into  southwestern 
Nebraska  and  northeastern  Colorado  where  wheat  production  is 
specialized.  The  relative  importance  of  wheat  production  in  this 
region  is  indicated  by  the  following  data: 


of  total 

Number  of 

U.  S.  wheat 

cash-grain 

produced 

farmers 

in  area 

75,  544 

20 

61,  427 

13 

9,  109 

9 

Item 

Subregion 

Total  (3 

93 

94 

103 

subregions) 

Total  wheat  produced  on  commercial  farms 
(1,000  bu.).             .                

39, 200 

4 

74 

20 

78,  586 
9 
84 
16 

108,  129 
12 
82 
18 

225,  975 

Percent  of  U.  S.  total  wheat  produced  on 

25 

Percent  of  region  total  wheat  produced  on 

SI 

Percent  of  region  total  wheat  produced  on 

19 

THE  HARD  WINTER  WHEAT  AREA, 
SUBREGIONS  93,  94,  AND  103 


Wheat  production  in  this  region  is  largely  the  result  of  physical 
conditions.  The  soils  and  temperature  are  favorable  for  such 
production,  and  the  precipitation  very  definitely  limits  the  alter- 
natives to  wheat. 

Most  of  the  soils  in  this  region  belong  to  the  Chernozem  group; 
these  are  dark,  deep,  heavy  prairie  soils,  which  are  excellent  for 
wheat  production.  But  obviously,  there  are  variations  in  the 
soils  and  amount  of  rainfall  in  so  large  a  territory.  Not  much 
of  the  occasional  coarse-textured  soil  is  used  for  wheat  except  on 
the  fringes  of  the  good  wheat  land  where,  stimulated  by  the  high 
prices  of  the  war  periods,  farmers  have  broken  grassland  not  well 
suited  to  wheat  production. 

Some  of  the  most  serious  problems  here  have  come  from  extend- 
ing wheat  production  to  land  unsuited  for  it.  Severe  wind  erosion 
is  not  limited  to  the  less  favorable  areas  but  occurs  most  often  and 
is  most  severe  in  such  areas.  If  winter  wheat  makes  little  growth 
in  the  fall  the  soil  surface  is  exposed  and  wind  erosion  is  likely  to 
take  place.  Damage  consists  of  the  destruction  of  the  wheat 
seedling  and  the  loss  of  the  topsoil. 

The  topography  varies  from  level  plains  to  undulating  and  roll- 
ing land.  The  slopes  are  seldom  so  steep  as  to  make  the  use  of 
large  machinery  difficult.  The  limiting  factor  is  rainfall  which 
varies  from  15  to  25  inches  annually.  About  three-fourths  of  this 
falls  during  the  growing  season. 

Because  of  the  limited  rainfall  and  high  rate  of  evaporation, 
much  of  the  wheat  is  grown  on  summer-fallow  land.  In  1954, 
the  wheat  and  summer-fallow  acreages  were: 

Subregion 


93 

94 

103 

Total 

1,418 

3,362 

7,  249 

12,  029 

}  acres). 

609 

280 

4,608 

5,497 

Figure  7. 


Wheat  (1,000  acres) 
Summer  fallow  (1,000  acres) 


The  extent  of  summer-fallowing  varies  considerably  in  the  hard 
winter  wheat  region  and  depends  on  the  annual  precipitation. 
Nearly  all  of  the  fallow  land  is  used  for  wheat.  Most  of  it  is 
found  in  areas  of  less  than  20  inches  of  rainfall.  In  dry  periods 
the  practice  of  summer-fallowing  shifts  considerably  to  the  east. 
In  years  of  above-normal  precipitation  the  summer-fallow  acreage 
may  be  reduced  throughout  the  entire  region. 

Transportation  facilities  and  markets  are  generally  adequate 
for  these  wheat  growers.  Local  elevators  are  found  in  practically 
every  town  along  the  railroads.  Considerable  quantities  of  grain 
are  transported  by  truck  to  the  central  markets.  Farm-to- 
market  roads  have  been  improved  but  relatively  few  are  hard- 
surfaced  and  many  are  not  even  graveled.  This  is  not  a  serious 
drawback  in  marketing  wheat  since  it  need  not  be  delivered  at 
any  set  time. 

When  yields  of  wheat  are  high,  a  very  large  quantity  is  harvested 
within  a  short  period,  approximately  2  months.  Local  areas  usually 
complete  their  harvest  in  10  to  20  days.  Railroads  frequently 
are  unable  to  provide  sufficient  boxcars  to  ship  the  grain  to  the 
terminal  markets  as  rapidly  as  harvested.  It  is  usual  to  store  some 
of  the  wheat  on  the  ground  in  the  fields  until  transportation  and 
storage  are  available.  This  may  seem  a  wasteful  practice  but  in 
the  western  part  of  the  region,  where  July  and  August  rainfall  is 
very  low,  it  provides  a  very  cheap  temporary  method  and  the 
risk  of  spoilage  is  not  high.  Storage  capacity  on  farms  and 
in  local  elevators  is  far  from  adequate  for  the  quantity  of  grain, 
but  it  has  been  increasing  very  rapidly  during  the  last  decade. 
Tall  elevators  dot  the  landscape.  Semiterminal  elevators  with 
capacities  in  the  millions  of  bushels  have  been  built  at  some 
of  the  larger  shipping  centers  such  as  Oklahoma  City,  Okla. ; 
Wichita  and  Hutchinson,  Kans. ;  and  Lincoln.  Nebr.,  in  the  hard 
winter  wheat  territory. 


WHEAT  PRODUCERS  AND  WHEAT  PRODUCTION 


11 


The  hard  winter  wheat  production  is  extending  northward. 
Mure  hardy  varieties  make  this  possible.  Generally,  farmers 
prefer  to  grow  winter  wheat  if  it  is  well  adapted  as  it  is  likely  to 
produce  higher  yields  because  of  its  longer  growing  season.  Seed- 
ing wheat  in  the  fall  reduces  the  fieldwork  in  the  spring.  Then 
too,  fall  seeding  provides  some  cover  for  the  soil  through  the 
winter  and  helps  to  prevent  the  soil  from  blowing. 

Hard  winter  wheat  is  also  expanding  into  the  soft  winter  wheat 
region.  The  Pawnee  variety,  developed  in  the  early  l'.MO's,  is 
very  well  adapted  to  conditions  in  the  western  Corn  Belt.  In 
some  years  more  than  half  of  the  wheat  acreage  in  southern  Iowa, 
northern  Missouri,  and  west-central  Illinois,  is  in  Pawnee  wheat. 
In  this  humid  area  Pawnee  produces  an  intermediate-type  wheat — 
it  is  lower  in  protein  and  has  a  weaker  gluten  than  when  grown 
in  a  drier  area.  This  wheat  can  be  used  in  blending  flour  for 
bread. 

In  the  hard  red  winter  wheat  region  there  is  considerable  varia- 
tion in  size  and  organization  of  farms  and  production,  and  in 
efficiency  levels.  Analysis  of  the  characteristics  of  commercial 
wheat  farms  by  economic  class  in  the  three  subregions  will  help 
to  explain  some  of  the  more  important  differences.  (In  this 
discussion  the  term  "wheat  farms"  in  this  region  is  used  as  synon- 
ymous with  "cash-grain  farms." 

Size  of  Business 

The  size  of  business  is  important  in  wheat  farming,  as  it  is  in 
all  phases  of  agriculture  and  in  business  outside  the  field  of  agri- 
culture. A  first,  requirement  of  high  returns  in  mechanized  agri- 
culture is  a  volume  of  business  large  enough  for  effective  use  of 
machinery  and  labor  resources. 

The  size  of  business  can  be  measured  in  several  ways.  In  the 
1954  Census,  farms  were  sorted  by  size  on  the  basis  of  gross  sales, 
and  divided  into  six  economic  classes.  (See  Introduction  for 
description  of  economic  classes.)  The  size  of  farm  business  can 
also  be  measured  in  other  ways.  For  example,  by  the  area  of 
land  operated,  or  the  capital  invested,  or  the  man-equivalent 
per  farm.  These  measures  of  size  are  given  for  the  three  sub- 
regions  in  tables  9,  10,  and  11. 

Classification  of  farms  by  the  amount  of  gross  sales  was  neces- 
sarily based  on  1-year's  data,  1954.  In  areas  of  specialized  crop 
production  gross  sales  in  any  one  year  are  determined  largely  by 
the  yields  and  prices  of  the  major  crop  produced.  Obviously, 
higher  or  lower  wheat  yields  would  have  changed  the  classifi- 
cation of  some  individual  farms.  For  example,  an  area  may  have 
a  high  percentage  of  farms  in  the  low-income  groups  because 
yields  were  abnormally  low  in  1954,  or  if  yields  were  much  above 
average,  the  number  of  farms  in  the  high-income  brackets  may  be 
abnormally  high.  A  comparison  of  yields  in  1954  with  average 
yields  will  give  some  indication  of  the  effect  of  the  1954  growing 
conditions  on  the  1954  classification  of  the  farms. 

S  u  bregio n 

93         94       103 

1954  wheat  vields  (bushels  per  acre) 20.5      19.7        12.2 

5-year  average  (1949-53)  yields 17.0     13.8       12.1 

■\Yheat  farming  in  this  area  is  characterized  by  large  acreages 
per  farm,  a  high  capital  investment,  and  a  family  type  of  farm. 
The  average  cash-grain  farmer  has  a  total  investment  of  $45,000 
to  $70,000  in  comparison  with  a  national  average  of  $26,000. 
Onh'  a  little  more  than  the  equivalent  of  one  man  is  employed  on 
the  typical  wheat  farm  here. 

Substantial  variation  in  size  of  farms  is  found  in  the  winter 
wheat  region.     Subregions  93  and  94  lie  in  the  eastern  part,  in 


southern  Nebraska,  and  in  central  Kansas,  where  production  per 
acre  is  relatively  high.  Here  the  land  can  be  farmed  more  in- 
tensively, compared  with  the  western  part,  because  of  the  high 
annual  rainfall.  Consequently,  the  farms  are  smaller  in  acreage 
farmed.  The  larger  farms  in  subregion  103  (western  Texas,  Okla- 
homa, Kansas,  and  eastern  Colorado)  require  a  larger  investment 
in  land  and  in  machinery  than  the  smaller  farms  in  subregions  93 
and  94.  The  livestock  investment  is  rather  uniform  in  all  three 
subregions.  Likewise,  the  labor  required  per  farm  is  approxi- 
mately the  same. 

Table  9. — Size  op  Cash-Grain   Farms  in   Subregion  93,  by 
Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

1 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Number  of  farms.  - 

Total  acres  per  farm 
Crop  acres  per  farm 

Capital  investment  per 
farm : 
Land  and  buildings 

dollars- - 

Livestock do 

Machinery do 

19,  859 
358 
258 

33.  745 
2,817 
8,023 

283 

1,073 

801 

97,  567 
7,509 
15,  820 

3,  868 
554 
403 

54.  577 

4,  385 
10,  665 

7,  768 
362 
264 

34,  659 
2,948 
8,218 

5,603 
257 
180 

22,  356 
2,003 
6,874 

1,910 
184 
125 

13,  827 
1,257 
5,143 

427 
132 

75 

10,  265 

778 

3,313 

Total do— - 

Man-equivalent    per 

44,  585 
1.2 

120,  896 
2.1 

69,  627 
1.4 

45,  825 
1.2 

31,233 
1.1 

20,  227 
0.9 

14,  356 

0.8 

Table  10. — Size  of  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  94,  by 
Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

I 

11 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Number  of  farms 

Total  acres  per  farm  .... 
Crop  acres  per  farm 

Capital  investment  per 
farm: 
Land  and  buildings 

dollars-  - 

Livestock do  ... 

Machinery do 

23,140 
362 
264 

44,  520 
2.283 
7,949 

413 
1,163 

861 

147,  439 
6,486 
15,948 

5, 179 
580 
435 

75.  019 
3.544 

10.627 

8,  630 
353 
260 

43,  546 
2,290 
7,956 

6,294 
226 
157 

25,  563 
1,503 
6,496 

2,233 
166 

106 

17.290 
1.042 
5,086 

391 
122 

67 

11,  897 

617 

3,606 

Total.-. do 

Man-equivalent    per 

54,752 
1.1 

169,  873 
2.1 

89,  190 
1.4 

53,792 
1.1 

33,  562 
1.0 

23.  lis 
0.8 

16.120 
i)  8 

Table  11. — Size  of  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  103,  by 
Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

1 

1,928 
2,  163 
1,534 

158,  204 
7,933 
18,  943 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Number  of  farms 

Total  acres  per  farm 
Crop  acres  per  farm 

Capital  investment  per 
farm: 
Land  and  buildings 

dollars- - 

Livestock do 

Machinery do 

32,  545 
820 
607 

55.  367 
3,040 
10,  832 

8,644 

1,076 

810 

77,  024 
4,  275 
13,  102 

10,  692 
713 
526 

47,  592 
2,794 
10,  389 

7,086 
519 
384 

31,  245 
1.805 
8,669 

3.353 
445 
331 

24.  516 
1,  033 
7,282 

842 
500 
395 

22, 145 

665 

6.  90(1 

Total do--- 

Man-equivalent    per 

69,239 
1.3 

185, 080 
2.5 

94,  401 
1.8 

60,  775 
1.2 

41,719 
1.0 

32,  831 
1.0 

29, 710 
1.0 

12 


FARMERS  AND  FARM  PRODUCTION 


Farms  in  Classes  IV,  V,  and  VI  have  a  small  amount  of  land 
and  capital  for  economic  family  farm  operation.  The  man-equiv- 
alent per  farm  indicates  that  many  of  the  smaller  farms  either  are 
operated  by  older  persons  or  that  the  operator  performs  only 
part-time  farmwork,  for  the  man-equivalent  of  labor  on  Classes 
V  and  VI  averaged  less  than  one.  The  average  Class  I  farms  in 
subregion  103  required  2.5  man-equivalent  as  compared  with  2 
for  subregions  93  and  94.  In  other  respects,  the  labor  require- 
ments of  the  average  farm  in  the  various  size  groups  are  similar 
for  the  three  subregions. 

The  size  of  farms  as  measured  by  gross  sales  is  consistent  with 
size  determined  by  other  measures.  Size  of  business  declines 
from  Class  I  farms  to  Class  VI  farms  regardless  of  the  measure 
used. 

One-half  to  two-thirds  of  the  cash-grain  farms  in  these  sub- 
regions  were  in  Economic  Classes  I,  II,  and  III.  Farms  in  these 
classes  had  a  volume  of  sales  of  $5,000  or  more,  each.  Only  a  small 
percentage  of  the  farms  in  subregions  93  and  94  were  Class  I 
farms.  Less  than  2  percent  of  the  cash-grain  farms  in  subregions 
93  and  94,  and  about  6  percent  of  the  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion 
103,  had  total  sales  of  $25,000  or  more.  Even  in  subregion  103, 
however,  many  of  these  Class  I  farms  would  not  be  considered  as 
large-scale  farms.  Labor  used  on  Class  I  farms  in  subregion  103 
averaged  only  2.5  man-equivalent  per  farm,  in  1954. 

The  larger  wheat  farms,  Class  I  to  Class  III,  have  investments 
of  $50,000  to  $185,000  each.  Differences  in  size  were  greatest 
in  terms  of  capital  investment.  The  number  of  workers  averaged 
from  1.1  to  2.5  man-equivalent  while  the  acreage  of  farmland  per 
farm  ranged  from  350  acres  for  Class  III  farms  to  more  than  2,000 
acres  for  the  large  Class  I  farms.  Class  I  farms  averaged  more 
than  2,000  acres  per  farm  in  subregion  103.  In  the  region  as  a 
whole,  nearly  three-fifths  of  the  farms  are  in  Classes  II  and  III. 
The  percentage  distribution  of  farms  by  economic  classes  is  shown 
in  table  12. 

Table  12. — Percentage  Distribution  of  Cash-Grain  Farms 
and  of  Wheat  Production  in  the  Hard  Winter  Wheat 
Region,  by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Item  and  subregion 


Number  of  farms: 

Subregion  93 

Subregion  94 

Subregion  103... 

Wheat  production 

Subregion  93 

Subregion  94 

Subregion  103... 


Economic  class  of  farm 


III 


IV 


Percent  of  the  total  in  the  subregion 


1.4 

19.5 

39.1 

28.2 

9.6 

l.S 

22.4 

37.3 

27.2 

9.6 

5.9 

26.6 

32.9 

21.8 

10.  3 

6.8 

36.0 

38.3 

15.9 

2.7 

7.5 

41.2 

35.3 

13.3 

2.5 

17.3 

41.8 

28.4 

9.7 

2.5 

2.  2 
2.6 


Crop  and  Livestock  Organization 

Land  use  and  crops  grown. — There  are  differences  among  the 
subregions  in  organization  of  the  cash-grain  farms.  Farms  in 
subregions  93  and  94  are  more  diversified  than  those  in  subregion 
103.  A  higher  percentage  of  the  cropland  is  summer-fallowed  in 
the  western  part  than  in  the  eastern  part  of  the  region.  The 
northern  part  of  subregion  93  produces  more  corn  than  wheat 
while  the  reverse  is  true  in  the  southern  part.  Much  of  the  corn 
throughout  the  area  is  sold  as  cash  grain.  The  variations  in  yield 
from  year  to  year  are  so  large  that  farmers  hesitate  to  keep  enough 


livestock  to  consume  the  average  crop  of  feed  produced.  In  the 
southern  part  of  subregion  103  (Texas,  Oklahoma,  and  Kansas) 
grain  sorghum  is  the  strongest  competitor  with  wheat  for  the  use  of 
cropland.  The  acreage  of  grain  sorghum  has  been  increasing  in 
the  northern  part  of  the  subregion  since  earlier  maturing  varieties 
have  become  available. 

The  most  highly  specialized  wheat  area  is  found  in  subregion 
94  where  59  percent  of  the  cropland  is  in  wheat.  (See  tables  13, 
14,  and  15.)  The  very  low  summer-fallow  acreage  partly  accounts 
for  this  but  this  subregion  also  has  a  small  acreage  in  other  crops. 
Subregion  93  emphasizes  corn  as  an  alternative  to  wheat  because 
of  fairly  favorable  annual  rainfall,  although  here  the  corn  crop 
frequently  fails.  The  acreages  of  grain  sorghum  are  increasing 
in  this  subregion.  In  subregion  103  the  acreage  of  grain  sorghum 
is  large  as  grain  sorghum  is  the  best  alternative  for  many  of  these 
farmers.  The  proportion  of  the  farms  that  is  in  pastureland  is 
quite  uniform. 

Table  13. — Land  Use  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  93, 
by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Item 

Percent 
of  farms 
report- 
ing 

Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

19. 859 

358 
258 
71 
73 
21 
92 
64 

2S3 

1,073 
801 
286 
201 
76 
249 
122 

3,868 

554 
403 
122 
109 

31 
138 

56 

7,768 

362 

264 

71 

77 
21 
91 
29 

5,603 

257 
180 
46 
53 
15 
69 
18 

1,910 

184 
125 
26 
38 
11 
53 
13 

427 

Acres  per  farm: 
All  land 

100 
100 
93 
92 
54 
92 
50 

132 

75 

Wheat 

13 

Corn 

Grain  sorghum 

27 
6 
52 

Summer  fallow 

8 

Table  14.- 


-Land  Use  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  94, 
by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Item 

Percent 
of  farms 
report- 
tag 

Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

23,140 

362 
264 
145 
15 
11 
95 
12 

413 

1.163 

861 

497 

46 

51 

295 

36 

5,179 

580 
435 
254 
22 
18 
142 
21 

8,630 

353 
260 
142 
15 
10 
90 
12 

6.294 

226 

157 

80 

11 

7 

66 

6 

2,233 

166 

106 

47 

7 

6 

56 

5 

391 

Acres  per  farm: 
All  land  . 

100 
100 
100 
55 
24 
90 
28 

122 

67 

Wheat 

27 

Oats 

5 

Grain  sorghum __  _ 

4 
54 

2 

Table  15. — Land  Use  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion 
103,  by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Percent 
of  farms 
report- 
ing 

Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

32, 545 

820 
607 
223 
115 
212 
142 

1,928 

2,163 
1,534 
569 
394 
639 
327 

8,644 

1,076 
810 
317 
158 
263 
186 

10,692 

713 
526 
199 
90 
185 
119 

7,086 

519 
384 
129 

66 
132 

93 

3,353 

445 
331 
94 
51 
114 
96 

842 

Acres  per  farm: 
All  land 

100 
100 
(NA) 
68 
82 
71 

500 

395 

Wheat 

55 

37 

106 

143 

NA  Not  availahle. 


WHEAT  PRODUCERS  AND  WHEAT  PRODUCTION 


13 


Within  each  of  the  subregions,  the  land-use  pattern  tends  to  be 
similar  for  all  economic  classes,  with  a  few  significant  differences. 
The  smaller  farms  (Class  V  and  VI)  have  a  higher  proportion  of 
land  in  permanent  pasture.  They  also  have  a  smaller  proportion 
of  the  cropland  in  wheat.  The  relatively  low  acreage  in  wheat 
on  Class  VI  farms  in  1954  in  subregion  103  was  probably  the  result 
of  a  complete  failure  of  the  wheat  crop  in  some  localities.  Failure 
of  the  major  crop  resulted  in  many  farms  being  classified  as  Class 
VI  i less  than  SI, 200  gross  sales).  Crop  failure  also  accounts  for 
the  larger  acreage  for  Class  VI  farms  than  for  Class  V  farms,  in 
subregion  103.  Some  oats  were  grown  in  all  parts  of  the  hard 
winter  wheat  region  but  the  oat  crop  was  less  important  in  sub- 
regions  93  and  103  than  in  subregion  94. 

Livestock. — Average  livestock  numbers  per  farm  in  the  winter 
wheat  region  are  more  uniform  among  the  subregions  than  is  the 
land-use  pattern.  (See  tables  17,  18,  and  19.)  Livestock  is  an 
additional  source  of  income  on  many  wheat  farms.  The  typical 
livestock  organization  is  to  have  enough  cattle  to  utilize  the  native 
pasture  and  consume  the  available  roughage.  The  cattle  are 
mostly  beef  cattle  but  a  few  milk  cows  are  kept  to  supply  milk 
for  the  farm  family.  A  small  flock  of  chickens  is  usual.  The 
:i\  erage  number  of  hogs  and  sheep  per  farm  is  very  low.  However, 
because  a  small  percentage  of  farms  have  hogs  or  sheep,  the  num- 
ber of  animals  per  farm  reporting  is  considerably  larger  than  shown 
by  the  data  in  tables  16,  17,  and  18. 

The  pattern  of  livestock  numbers  by  economic  class  of  farm  is 
similar  for  all  subregions.  The  large  farms  have  more  cattle 
but  about  the  same  number  of  milk  cows  per  farm.  In  subregion 
93,  the  large  farms  have  more  hogs  than  the  smaller  farms,  reflect- 
ing the  higher  corn  production  compared  with  that  in  subregions 
94  and  103.  In  general,  sheep  are  found  on  the  larger  farms, 
usually  on  farms  that  can  carry  at  least  100  ewes.  Many  flocks 
are  much  larger. 

Table  16. — Livestock  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  93, 
by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Percent 

Economic  class  of  farm 

report- 
ing 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

19. 859 

26 
3 

10 

1 

113 

1,725 
2,817 

283 

71 
2 

22 

8 

102 

6,867 
7,509 

3,868 

40 
4 
17 
3 
123 

3,272 
4,385 

7,768 

27 
4 
10 

123 

1,736 
2.948 

5,603 

19 
3 
6 

111 

946 
2,003 

1.910 

12 

2 

3 

(z) 

420 
1,257 

427 

Livestock,      number      per 
farm: 

87 
68 
43 
3 
79 

XXX 

XXX 

1 

2 

(z) 

47 

Gross  sales  of  livestock  and 
livestock     products    per 
farm .dollars.. 

Investment  in  livestock  per 
farm...  ._  __  _. .dollars.. 

156 

778 

z  Less  than  0.5. 


Table  17- — Livestock  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  94, 
by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Item 

Percent 
of  farms 
report- 
ing 

Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

I 

413 

77 
5 
6 

13 

77 

6,470 
6,486 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

23.140 

26 
3 
3 

5 
90 

1,551 
2,282 

5,179 

41 
4 
5 

10 
103 

2,832 
3,544 

8,630 

26 
3 
3 
4 

100 

1,469 
2.290 

6,294 

17 
3 
2 

2 
81 

782 
1.503 

2,233 

12 
2 
2 
2 

59 

404 
1,042 

391 

Livestock,      number     per 
farm: 
All  cattle 

85 
59 
24 
10 
75 

XXX 
XXX 

1 

1 

48 

Gross  sales  of  livestock  and 
livestock     products    per 
farm dollars.. 

Investment  in  livestock  per 
farm dollars.  . 

144 
617 

Table    18. — Livestock   on   Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion 
103,  by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Number  of  farms. 


Livestock,      number      per 
farm: 

All  cattle.. 

Milk  cows 

Hogs 

Sheep 

Chickens 


Gross  sales  of  livestock  and 
livestock  products  per 
farm dollars. . 

Investment  in  livestock  per 
farm dollars.. 


Percent 
of  farms 
report- 
ing 


XXX 

XXX 


Economic  class  of  farm 


1.682 
3,040 


6.147 
7.933 


II 


8,  644 


2.579 

1.  275 


III 


10,692 


1.340 

2,  794 


IV 


711 

1,SI  15 


3.  353 


329 
1,033 


VI 


842 


(z) 
(z> 


110 
665 


z  Less  than  0.5. 


Obviously,  some  of  the  operators  of  the  smaller  farms  have  not 
increased  their  volume  of  business  by  producing  more  livestock. 
Probably  the  lack  of  capital  and  the  uncertainty  of  feed  production 
are  major  reasons.  Some  of  the  farmers  have  intensive  livestock 
enterprises.  A  few  farmers  are  able  to  take  advantage  of  the  lim- 
ited outlets  for  fluid  milk  and  high-quality  eggs  in  the  area. 

Pasturing  wheat  is  a  common  practice  in  the  hard  red  winter 
wheat  region.  The  wheat,  seeded  early  in  the  fall,  frequently 
makes  rapid  growth  especially  on  summer-fallow  land.  Moderate 
pasturing  is  not  harmful  and  some  growers  feel  it  increases  the 
yields  in  years  of  very  rank  growth.  Grazing  is  done  in  both  the 
fall  and  spring;  in  years  of  little  snowfall  it  may  continue  through 
the  winter.  Some  wheat  growers  buy  feeders  for  grazing,  others 
take  in  feeders  for  grazing  on  a  rental  or  contract  basis.  The 
cattle  and  lambs  make  good  gains  on  the  lush  growth  of  wheat 
when  weather  conditions  are  favorable  and  many  are  brought  in 
for  the  purpose.  Most  of  these  feeder  cattle  and  sheep  were  not 
included  in  the  Census  data  because  they  usually  are  brought  in 
after  October  15,  the  approximate  date  of  the  1954  Census. 

Labor  Used 

In  spite  of  their  relatively  large  size  when  measured  in  acres, 
gross  sales,  or  capital  investment,  the  wheat  farms  in  the  winter 
wheat  regions  are  typically  family  farms.  On  many,  the  family 
provides  nearly  all  of  the  labor;  only  the  very  largest  hire  a  large 
amount  of  labor. 

For  the  purpose  of  showing  the  amounts  of  labor  used  on  cash- 
grain  farms,  all  labor  was  converted  to  an  average  man-equivalent 
basis.  This  was  done  in  order  that  more  meaningful  comparisons 
might  be  made  between  the  different  sizes  of  cash-grain  farms  and 
between  cash-grain  farms  in  different  subregions.  In  the  discus- 
sion and  tables  that  follow,  an  adjustment  is  made  for  operators 
over  65  years  old  and  for  those  who  reported  they  worked  at  an 
off-farm  job  during  the  year.  Operators  under  65  years  with  no 
off-farm  work  were  considered  as  one  man-equivalent,  even  though 
wheat  production  is  a  seasonal  job.  The  expenditure  for  hired 
labor  was  divided  by  an  annual  average  wage  for  the  locality  in 
order  to  provide  man-equivalents  for  the  number  of  hired  workers. 
The  number  of  unpaid  family  workers  was  adjusted  to  take  account 
of  women  and  children  and  elderly  persons  included  in  the  total. 
The  procedure  for  estimating  labor  on  man-equivalents  is  explained 
in  detail  in  the  Introduction. 

Farm  operators  comprised  slightly  less  than  one  man-equivalent 
per  farm  in  each  of  the  subregions,  but  made  up  the  bulk  of  the 
labor  force.  (See  table  19.)  Hired  labor  was  relatively  unim- 
portant when  cash-grain  farms  were  taken  as  a  group.  Sources 
of  labor  were  quite  similar  for  the  three  subregions  as  a  whole. 


14 


FARMERS  AND  FARM  PRODUCTION 


When  classified  by  gross  sales,  the  Class  I  farmers  depended  on 
hired  help  equaling  about  as  much  as  the  operator's  labor.  Farm- 
ers'in  the  other  size  groups  hired  very  little  help,  depending  largely 
on  the  members  of  the  operator's  family.  The  sources  of  farm  labor 
and  the  age  of  operators  for  the  three  subregions,  and  by  economic 
class  for  subregion  93,  are  shown  in  table  19.  Because  of  the  simi- 
larity of  distribution  by  economic  class  of  farm  among  the  sub- 
regions  this  detail  is  not  shown  for  subregions  94  and  103. 

Table  19. — Labor  Force  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  the  Hard 
Red  Winter  Wheat  Region,  and  for  Subregion  93  by 
Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Item 

Subregion 

Economic  class  of  farm  for  subregion  93 

93 

94 

103 

1 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Total  man-equivalent 

1.2 

1.2 

1.3 

2.1 

1.4 

1.2 

1.1 

0.9 

0.8 

Operator . 

Unpaid  family  help 
Hired.      

.9 
.2 
.1 

100 

.8 
.2 
.1 

100 

.8 
.3 
.2 

100 

.9 
.3 
.9 

100 

.9 
.3 
2 

100 

.9 
.2 
.1 

100 

.8 
.2 

(z) 

100 

.2 
(z) 

100 

.1 

(z) 

Operators  by  age: 
All  operators.. percent- . 

100 

Under  25years_do 

25-34  years do 

35-64  years do 

65  years  &  over  do 

3 

19 

69 

9 

2 
16 
70 
12 

3 

18 
69 
10 

2 
19 
73 

6 

1 
22 
74 

3 

3 
22 
69 

6 

4 

16 
68 
12 

4 
13 
63 
20 

5 
6 
61 

28 

z  Less  than  0.05. 

Figures  on  the  age  of  operators  show  that  more  of  the  beginning 
farmers  and  more  of  the  farmers  over  65  years  were  in  Class  VI 
than  in  any  other  income  size  group  in  1954.  If  this  is  a  typical 
situation,  some  of  the  young  men  in  the  lowest  income  group  have 
been  able  to  improve  their  situation,  for  in  the  25-to-34-year  group, 
the  percentage  in  Class  VI  is  the  smallest. 

Farm  Mechanization  and  Home  Conveniences 

The  degree  of  mechanization  on  the  farm  and  the  number  of 
home  conveniences  reflect  the  financial  situation  of  the  farm  family 
and  the  progressiveness  of  the  farm  operator.  In  a  few  localities 
it  is  impossible  to  obtain  such  modern  conveniences  as  television 
or  electricity,  although  electric  lines  are  now  available  to  most 
farmers  in  the  wheat  country. 

The  degree  of  mechanization  and  use  of  home  conveniences  are 
indicated  in  table  20.  Class  I  and  II  farms  are  more  highly 
mechanized  than  the  smaller  groups  of  lower  income.  As  their 
operators  have  a  large  acreage,  they  can  use  modern  machinery 
efficiently.  They  also  have  enough  income  to  allow  the  purchase  of 
modern  equipment  which  most  Class  I  and  II  farmers  now  have. 
Many  of  the  operators  of  smaller  farms  have  neither  the  capital  to 
buy  modern  machinery  nor  the  acreage  to  use  it  efficiently.  It  is 
characteristic  that  many  of  the  operators  of  Class  V  and  VI  farms 
hire  the  use  of  highly  specialized,  expensive  machinery.  For 
example,  the  number  of  farms  reporting  combines  varies  consider- 
ably by  size  of  farm  in  the  three  subregions: 


Item 

Economic  class  of  farm 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Percent  of  farmers  reporting  combines: 
Subregion  93  ....    .      .      

91 

89 
80 

1.2 
1.4 
1.4 

S5 
86 
84 

.9 

1.0 
1.  1 

76 
80 
79 

.8 
.8 
.9 

64 
65 
67 

.7 
.7 

.8 

45 
48 
55 

.5 
.5 
.6 

25 

33 

Subregion  103 _    .    

47 

Number  of  combines  per  farm: 

.2 

Subregion  94.    _. 

.3 

Subregion  103 

.6 

Table  20. — Farm  Mechanization  and  Home  Conveniences 
on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  the  Hard  Red  Winter  Wheat 
Region,  and  for  Subregion  94  by  Economic  Class  of 
Farm:  1954 


Item 


Number  of  farms 

Number  per  farm: 

Automobiles 

Motortrucks 

Tractors 

Combines 

Percent  of  farms  report 
ing — 

Automobiles 

Motortrucks 

Tractors 

Combines.-. 

Corn  pickers _. 

Field  forage  harvesters 

Telephones 

Electricity  

Television  sets 

Piped  water  in  home_. 
Home  freezer 


Subregion 


93         94        103 


19.  859 


1.6 
.7 


23,  140 


1.  1 
1.2 
1.7 


1.2 
1.5 
1. 


Economic  class  of  farm  for  subregion  94 


1  ii 
2.3 
3.3 
1.4 


1.2 
1.6 
2.3 
1.0 


86 


.  1311 


1  1 
1.2 
1.7 


6,294 

1.0 

.9 
1.4 


2,  233 


1  ii 
.7 

1.2 
.5 


VI 


0.8 

.5 


73 
44 
76 
33 
1 
1 
54 
74 
17 
37 
12 


In  subregions  93  and  94  the  number  of  combines  decreases  with 
the  size  of  farm.  In  subregion  103  the  same  general  relationship  is 
found,  although  a  higher  percentage  of  operators  for  Class  II  farms 
owned  combines  than  for  Class  I  farms,  and  Class  III  farmers 
averaged  more  combines  per  farm  than  the  Class  I  farmers.  In 
this  area  a  number  of  the  large  farm  operators  depend  entirely  on 
custom  combining.  Notwithstanding  their  large  acreages  some 
believe  that  they  can  hire  the  work  done  more  economically  than 
they  can  do  it  with  their  own  equipment.  This  hiring  helps  to  solve 
their  labor  problem  at  harvest  time  for  usually  the  custom  operator 
furnishes  operators  for  the  machines. 

Most  farmers  own  at  least  one  automobile.  The  exceptions  are 
usually  farmers  who  use  their  trucks  for  family  transportation. 
Not  all  farmers  in  any  economic  class  own  tractors  as  a  few  depend 
on  having  all  of  their  work  performed  on  a  custom  basis.  Custom 
work  is  more  common  among  those  in  the  lowest  income  group  than 
among  those  in  the  higher  income  groups.  Cornpickers  are  more 
common  in  subregion  93  because  much  more  corn  is  produced  here 
than  in  the  other  subregions. 

Differences  in  farm  income  are  reflected  more  in  the  conven- 
iences in  the  home  than  in  the  degree  of  farm  mechanization.  Farm 
families  on  the  lowest  income  farms  usually  do  not  have  enough 
capital  to  buy  such  items  as  home  freezers,  television  sets,  and  a 
water  system  for  the  house. 

Gross  Farm  Income 

Average  gross  income  per  farm  was  considerably  higher  in  sub- 
region  103,  in  1954,  where  the  farms  are  larger  than  in  subregions 
93  and  94. 

The  important  sources  of  income  vary  among  the  three  sub- 
regions.  Subregion  94  specializes  in  wheat  to  a  higher  degree  than 
the  other  areas  as  indicated  in  the  following  data: 


Item 

Economic  class  of  farm 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Percent  of  gross  sales  from  wheat: 

44 
74 
38 

39 

75 
57 

40 
75 
63 

41 

74 
61 

37 
73 
61 

41 

SuMvL'iun  94--_.       --       ---.        --    .    

74 
55 

WHEAT  PRODUCERS  AND  WHEAT  PRODUCTION 


15 


In  subregion  93  farmers  had  considerable  income  from  corn  but 
the  relative  importance  of  wheat  as  a  source  of  income  varied  little 
among  the  economic  classes  of  farms.  (Table  21  gives  the  sources 
of  farm  income  in  the  winter  wheat  region.)  In  subregion  103 
where  grain  sorghum  is  an  important  source  of  income,  Class  I 
farmers  ranked  lowest  in  percentage  of  gross  sales  from  wheat  and 
received  more  income  from  grain  sorghum  than  from  wheat. 
Farmers  in  the  other  five  economic  classes  received  more  than  half 
their  income  from  wheat.  Gross  sales  per  crop  acre  are  higher  in 
the  eastern  part  of  subregion  103  because  of  the  higher  yields. 
Gross  sales  per  crop  acre  (see  table  21)  indicate  that  the  problem  of 
the  operators  of  the  smaller  farms  involves  not  only  the  area  of 
land  farmed  but  also  the  level  of  production. 

Table  21. — Sources  of  Farm  Income  on  Cash-Grain  Farms 
in  the  Hard  Red  Winter  Wheat  Region,  and  for  Sub- 
region  94  by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Subregion 

Economic  class  of  farm  for  subregion  94 

93 

94 

103 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

19.  859 

2.947 

1.913 

88 

505 

178 

23, 140 

5,818 

19 

87 

73 

236 

32,545 

5,457 
51 
12 

2,421 
446 

413 

24,889 

69 

409 

538 

1.207 

5,179 

10,  808 
30 
138 
131 
513 

8,630 

5.  465 
20 
78 
54 
188 

6,294 

2,826 

8 

57 

39 

90 

2,233 

1,422 

9 

34 

36 

48 

391 

Sales  per  farm: 

Wheat _.  .dollars. . 

Corn...  __  do 

Oats do 

Grain  sorghum. __do 

Other  crops do 

584 

22 

24 

3 

16 

All  crops do 

Livestock    and    live- 
stock products 

dollars.. 

5,631 
1,725 

6.233 
1,551 

8,387 
1,682 

-'7,  112 
6,470 

11,620 
2.832 

5,805 
1,469 

3,020 

782 

1,549 
404 

649 
144 

Gross  sales.. .do 

Percentage  of  gross  sales 

from  wheat 

Gross  sales  per  crop  acre 
dollars. . 

7.356 

40 
28.57 

7.784 

75 
29.51 

10,069 

54 
16.60 

33,582 

74 
39.01 

14,452 

75 
33.23 

7,274 

75 
27.93 

3.802 

74 
24.28 

1,953 

73 
18.43 

793 

74 
11.83 

Farm  Expenses 

Not  all  costs  of  operating  farms  were  included  on  the  1954  Census 
Questionnaire,  but  the  Census  does  provide  data  for  some  of  the 
major  cost  items.  These  serve  to  indicate  differences  in  cost  of 
production  by  areas  and  by  the  size  of  business  (see  tables  22,  23, 
and  24). 

Table  22. — Specified  Farm  Expenditures  on  Cash-Grain  Farms 
in  Subregion  93,  by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Economic  class  of  farm 

Item 

Total 

1 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Average  per  farm: 

Cropland 

..acres.. 

258 

801 

403 

264 

180 

125 

75 

Machine  hire 

dollars.. 

223 

593 

335 

227 

163 

131 

63 

Gas  and  oil...  ...  ._ 

...do.... 

575 

1.664 

905 

585 

412 

279 

171 

Hired  labor .. 

...do.... 

161 

1,523 

354 

119 

69 

46 

11 

Commercial  fertilizer 

...do.... 

228 

1.267 

527 

206 

80 

36 

25 

Feed  bought 

do.... 
...do.... 

440 

1,240 

743 

449 

298 

170 

76 

Total 

1,627 

6,287 

2,864 

1,586 

1,022 

662 

346 

Average  per  crop  acre: 

Machine  hire 

(lull.iis 

0.86 

0.74 

0.83 

0.86 

0.91 

1.05 

0.84 

Gas  and  oil 

...do.... 

2.23 

2.08 

2.25 

2.22 

2.29 

2.23 

2.28 

Hired  labor 

...do.... 

.62 

1.90 

.88 

.45 

.38 

.37 

.15 

Commercial  fertilizer 

...do.... 
...do.... 

.88 

1.58 

1.31 

.78 

.44 

.29 

.33 

Total 

4.59 

6.30 

5.27 

4.31 

4.02 

3.94 

3.60 

Subregion  103  has  the  highest  specified  expenditures  per  farm 
because  the  acreage  farmed  per  operator  is  larger  than  in  other 
subregions.  However,  costs  per  acre  are  considerably  lower  be- 
cause the  land  is  farmed  less  intensively  in  this  more  arid  of  the 
subregions. 


Table  23. — Specified  Farm  Expenditures  on  Cash-Grain  Farms 
in  Subregion  94,  by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Economic  class  of  farm 

Item 

Totil 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Average  per  farm: 

Cropland __. 

..acres.. 

264 

861 

435 

260 

157 

106 

67 

Machine  hire 

dollars.  . 

263 

996 

404 

252 

167 

148 

79 

Gas  and  oil 

...do.... 

525 

1,526 

827 

521 

345 

226 

123 

Hired  labor 

...do.... 

241 

1,682 

489 

181 

103 

55 

26 

Commercial  fertilizer 

...do... 

171 

761 

339 

149 

79 

49 

16 

Feed  bought 

do.... 
...do... 

580 

1,690 

948 

570 

359 

256 

132 

Total 

1.780 

6.655 

3,007 

1.673 

1,053 

734 

376 

Average  per  crop  acre: 

Machine  hire 

dollars.. 

1.00 

1.16 

0.93 

0.97 

1.07 

1.39 

1.17 

Gas  and  oil... _. 

...do... 

1.99 

1.77 

1.90 

2.00 

2.21 

2.13 

1.83 

Hired  labor.  

...do.... 

.91 

1.95 

1.13 

.70 

.66 

.52 

.39 

Commercial  fertilizer 

...do.... 
...do.... 

.65 

.88 

.78 

.57 

.51 

.46 

.24 

Total.... 

4.55 

5.76 

4.74 

4.24 

4.45 

4.50 

3.63 

Table  24. — Specified  Farm  Expenditures  on  Cash-Grain  Farms 
in  Subregion  103,  by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Average  per  farm: 

Cropland acres.. 

Machine  hire dollars 

Gas  and  oil do 

Hired  labor ..do 

Commercial  fertilizer... do 

Feed  bought do 

607 
473 
913 
504 
61 
400 

1,534 

1,867 

2.795 

2,  905 

427 

972 

810 
543 
1.  204 
713 
88 
552 

526 
341 

775 

272 

27 

373 

384 
246 
542 
176 
13 
246 

331 
225 
434 
107 
5 
169 

395 

121 
406 
125 

m 

86 

Total ...do.... 

Average  per  crop  acre: 

Machine  hire dollars.. 

Gas  and  oil do 

Hired  labor do 

Commercial  fertilizer . .  .do 

2,351 

0.78 
1.51 
.83 
.10 

8,966 

1.22 
1.82 
1.89 
.28 

3,200 

0.79 
1.49 

.88 
.11 

1,788 

0.65 
1.47 
.52 
.05 

1,223 

0.64 

1.41 

.46 

.03 

940 

0.68 
1.31 
.32 
.02 

738 

0.31 
1.03 
.32 

Total do 

3.22 

5.21 

3.27 

2.69 

2.54 

2.33 

1.66 

2  Less  than  50  cents  or  less  than  0.5  cent. 

In  subregions  93  and  94,  the  cost  per  acre  for  machine  hire  was 
about  the  same  for  all  economic  classes  of  farms.  In  subregion 
103  the  smaller  farms  spent  considerably  less  for  this  item;  even 
for  the  smallest  farms  the  average  per  acre  of  cropland  is  less  than 
any  other  groups.  In  subregion  103  many  of  the  Class  VI  farmers 
own  a  combine  and  spend  little  for  machine  hire. 

The  smaller  expenditures  for  gas  and  oil  per  crop  acre  for  the 
smaller  farms  in  subregion  103  may  reflect  less  intensive  operation. 
It  is  possible  that  the  operators  of  Class  V  and  VI  farms  did  not 
summer-till  the  soil  as  often  as  the  operators  of  other  classes  of 
farms.  Since  the  Class  VI  farms  were  also  lowest  in  machine 
hire  per  crop  acre,  it  is  not  likely  that  the  saving  in  gas  and  oil 
was  due  to  more  custom  work  hired.  It  may  be  that  the  lower 
fuel  consumption  per  acre  reflects  less  tillage  of  the  soil. 

The  amount  of  hired  labor  decreases  with  the  decrease  in  acreage 
farmed.  The  smallest  size  groups  hired  only  a  little  labor.  The 
amount  of  feed  bought  is  closely  related  to  the  number  of  livestock 
on  ths  farm. 

Use  of  commercial  fertilizer  in  wheat  production  is  a  recent 
practice  in  the  winter  wheat  region.  Farmers  in  the  eastern  part 
have  received  a  good  response  in  higher  yields.  In  the  western 
part  of  the  area  the  use  of  commercial  fertilizer  is  not  a  common 
practice.  In  all  three  subregions  commercial  fertilizer  is  used 
more  commonly  on  the  large  farms  than  on  those  with  low  gross 
sales.  The  figures  for  rate  of  application  are  not  fully  significant 
because  the  composition  of  the  fertilizer  was  not  known.  The 
rate  of  application  is  rather  uniform  regardless  of  economic  class 
of  the  farm.  This  may  indicate  that  those  farmers  who  use  fer- 
tilizer are  using  the  recommended  quantities.     (See  table  25.) 


16 


FARMERS  AND  FARM  PRODUCTION 


Table  25. — Use  of  Commercial  Fertilizer  on  Cash-Grain 
Farms  in  the  Hard  Red  Winter  Wheat  Region,  by 
Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Subregion  93 

Percent  of  farms  using  fertilizer. . 
Tons  used  per  farm  ..  _  ._ 
Rate  of  application,  pounds  per 

44.0 
2.3 

128 

73.0 
11.7 

108 

65.0 
5.1 

132 

48.0 
2.1 

200 

33.0 

.8 

122 

20.0 
.3 

113 

14.0 
.3 

162 

Subregion  94 

Percent  of  farms  using  fertilizer.. 

43.0 
2.1 

81 

62.0 
8.6 

78 

56.0 
4.1 

79 

45.0 
1.9 

82 

37.0 
1.0 

84 

28.0 

99 

17.0 
.2 

Rate  of  application,  pounds  per 

78 

Subregion  103 

Percent  of  farms  using  fertilizer.. 

11.0 

.7 

103 

31.0 
4.7 

125 

17.0 
1.0 

94 

9.0 
.3 

87 

6.0 
.2 

106 

3.0 
.1 

68 

1.0 
(z) 

Rate  of  application,  pounds  per 

22 

z  Less  than  0.05  ton. 

Efficiency  Levels  of  Farm  Operation 

Efficiency  in  the  use  of  resources  is  an  important  consideration 
in  any  business.  It  is  important  to  the  individual  farm  operator 
because  efficiency  is  reflected  in  farm  earnings. 

Census  data  do  not  provide  all  the  information  needed  to  make 
a  complete  analysis  of  the  differences  among  economic  classes  or 
among  subregions  in  efficiency  of  farm  operation,  but  can  be  used 
to  make  comparisons  which  indicate  general  levels,  even  though 
the  specific  figures  may  not  always  reflect  the  precise  relationships. 
The  comparisons  made  in  tables  26,  27,  and  28  indicate  wide 
differences  among  economic  classes  of  farms  in  levels  of  efficiency 
in  the  hard  red  winter  wheat  region. 

Gross  sales  minus  the  specified  expenditures  do  not  include  any 
fixed  costs  nor  all  operating  costs.  Net  income  would  be  much 
less  than  indicated  by  gross  sales  minus  specified  expenditures. 
Obviously,  Classes  V  and  VI  farms  with  less  than  $2,500  gross  sales 
each,  cannot  have  a  high  net  income. 

Measures  such  as  gross  sales  per  man-equivalent  and  crop  acres 
per  man-equivalent,  indicate  accomplishment  per  worker.  In  all 
subregions  gross  sales  and  crop  acres  per  man  decline  rapidly  from 
Class  I  to  Class  VI  farms.  Less  than  150  crop  acres  per  man  do 
not  provide  full-time  employment  for  a  wheat  farmer  and  gross 
sales  of  $1,000  per  man  cannot  provide  a  high  level  of  living  for 
a  farm  family. 

The  total  investment  per  dollar  of  sales  and  per-man  indicates 
that  the  farmers  on  the  smaller  farms  do  not  have  sufficient 
capital  resources.  Sales  per  dollar  of  investment  on  Class  II 
farms  are  double  those  on  Class  V  farms.  Capital  investment 
per  man  on  Class  V  farms  is  about  half  that  on  Class  II  farms. 
Most  of  the  difference  in  investment  arises  from  differences  in 
investment  in  land  and  buildings.  Estimated  machinery  invest- 
ment per  worker  is  about  the  same  for  the  various  classes  of  farms. 

The  Class  VI  farmers  in  subregion  103  have  a  much  higher  total 
investment  per  man-equivalent  and  more  crop  acres  per  man  than 
the  Class  VI  farmers  in  the  other  subregions.  In  this  subregion, 
it  is  probable  that  some  large  farms  had  a  complete  crop  failure 
and  abnormally  low  yields  in  1954,  and  for  these  reasons  fell  into 
a  low  gross-income  group. 


Table  26. — Selected  Measures  of  Income  and  Efficiency 
Levels  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  93,  by  Economic 
Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Item 

Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Gross  sales  per  farm        dollars. 
Specified  expenses  per  farm 

dollars.  _ 
Gross   sales   less   specified   ex- 
penses per  farm dollars-- 

Gross  sales  per  man-equivalent 

dollars.. 

Total  investment  per  $100  gross 

sales dollars.. 

Total     investment    per    man- 
equivalent .  dollars,. 

Machinery  investment  per  man- 
equivalent .  .  ...dollars.. 

Machinery  investment  per  crop 
acre ...  .  dollars  . 

Winter  wheat  yield  per  acre 

bushels.  . 

Crop  acres  per  man-equivalent. . 

7,356 
1,642 
5,714 
6,229 
610 

37,  083 

6,799 

31 

21 
218 

32, 815 

6,374 

26,  441 

15,740 

369 

57,  570 

7,606 

20 

24 
384 

14, 000 
2,891 

11, 109 
9,876 

497 

49,  734 

7,511 

26 

22 
284 

7,261 
1.  601 
5,660 
6,051 
636 

38, 187 

6,848 

31 

20 
220 

3,931 
1,027 
2,904 
3,707 
801 

28,394 

6,485 

38 

18 
170 

2,017 
667 
1,350 
2,179 
1,011 

22,  474 

5,530 

41 

16 
135 

857 

346 

511 

1,054 

1,794 

17, 945 

4,090 

44 

16 
92 

Table  27- — Selected  Measures  of  Income  and  Efficiency 
Levels  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  94,  by  Economic 
Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Item 

Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Gross  sales  per  farm dollars.. 

Specified  expenses  per  farm 

dollars.. 
Gross   sales   less   specified    ex- 
penses per  farm dollars.. 

Gross  sales  per  man-equivalent 

dollars.. 

Total  investment  per  $100  gross 

sales ...  dollars.. 

Total     investment    per    man- 
equivalent.. dollars.  . 

Machinery  investment  per  man- 
equivalent .dollars.. 

Machinery  investment  per  crop 
acre  ...    _  .  dollars.. 

Winter  wheat  yield  per  acre 

bushels.. 

Crop  acres  per  man-equivalent.. 

7,784 
1.787 
5,997 
7,058 

701 

49,  775 

7,208 

30 

19.7 
239 

33,583 
6,665 
26, 918 
15,  997 
506 

80. 892 

7,597 

19 

24.2 

410 

14, 454 
3,024 
11,429 
10,  574 
619 

63,707 

7,774 

24 

20.8 
318 

7,275 
1,680 
5,595 
6,502 
747 

48,  902 

7,111 

31 

19.1 
233 

3,802 
1,056 

2,747 
4,084 

883 

33,  562 

6,977 

41 

17.6 
168 

1,953 
738 
1,215 
2,506 
1,232 

29,  272 

6,527 

48 

15.4 
140 

793 
376 

417 

985 

2,303 

20,150 
4,476 

54 

12.6 
83 

Table  28. — Selected  Measures  of  Income  and  Efficiency 
Levels  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  103,  by  Economic 
Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Economic  class  of  farm 

Item 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Gross  sales  per  farm dollars.. 

10, 068 

42,  614 

15,  219 

7,404 

3,846 

2,044 

825 

Specified  expenses  per  farm 

dollars. . 

2,351 

8,966 

3,201 

1,788 

1,224 

941 

739 

Gross    sales   less   specified   ex- 

penses per  farm dollars.. 

7,717 

33,648 

12,018 

5,616 

2,622 

1,  103 

86 

Gross  sales  per  man-equivalent 

dollars- 

7,789 

16,846 

10, 130 

6,013 

3.704 

2,384 

857 

Total  investment  per  $100  gross 

sales dollars.. 

692 

434 

621 

821 

1,098 

1,642 

3,714 

Total     investment    per    man- 

equivalent ..dollars.. 

53,  261 

74, 032 

62,  933 

50,646 

41,719 

32,  831 

29,  710 

Machinery  investment  per  man- 

equivalent dollars.. 

8,379 

7,489 

8,721 

8,436 

8,348 

8,495 

7,163 

Machinery  investment  per  crop 

18 

12 

16 

20 

23 

22 

17 

Winter  wheat  yield  per  acre 

bushels.  . 

12 

14 

13 

12 

9 

7 

5 

Crop  acres  per  man-equivalent.. 

469 

606 

539 

427 

370 

386 

410 

WHEAT  PRODUCERS  AND  WHEAT  PRODUCTION 


17 


OTHER   TYPES   OF   FARMING    IN    THE    HARD    RED 
WINTER  WHEAT  REGION 

Rarely  do  all  the  farmers  of  an  area  follow  the  same  line  of 
production.  Differences  in  production  conditions,  available 
resources,  and  personal  preferences  lead  to  diversity  of  production 
within  an  area.  Throughout  the  wheat  regions  are  farms  that 
have  been  classified  as  other  types  because  cash  grain  did  not 
provide  the  major  source  of  income  in  1954.  Only  the  most 
common  types  of  farming  other  than  cash-grain  will  be  described. 
A  little  more  than  one-fifth  of  the  wheat  produced  in  the  hard  red 
winter  wheat  region  is  grown  on  Uiese  other  types  of  farms. 

General  farms  are  those  which  diversify  their  production  to  the 
extent  that  no  one  enterprise  provides  one-half  of  the  gross  income. 
General  farms  usually  produce  the  same  commodities  as  the  more 
specialized  farms  in  the  same  area  but  they  are  less  dependent 
on  a  single  farm  product.  The  difference  in  farm  organization  is 
more  in  emphasis  on  particular  enterprises  than  in  types  of  enter- 
prises. Although  cash  grain  is  an  important  source  of  income  for 
these  general  farms,  it  did  not  furnish  one-half  of  gross  sales  in 
1954. 

In  the  northern  part  of  the  hard  winter  wheat  region  general 
farming  is  common.  Here,  general  farms  are  organized  much  like 
the  cash-grain  farms  in  subregion  93  but  more  emphasis  is  given 
to  feed  grain  and  livestock  production. 

Also,  in  this  subregion  are  more  than  25,000  livestock  farms  that 
emphasize  production  of  livestock  oilier  than  dairy  or  poultry. 
Here  again,  the  land-use  pattern  is  much  like  that  of  the  cash- 
grain  farms  with  less  emphasis  on  wheat  and  usually  a  larger 
acreage  of  pasture.  In  subregions  93  and  94  the  livestock  farms 
are  similar  to  those  of  the  Corn  Belt.  Here,  the  emphasis  is  on 
roughage-consuming  livestock,  especially  beef  cattle.  A  few- 
farmers  fatten  cattle,  some  feed  out  only  the  cattle  they  raise, 
and  many  market  their  cattle  as  feeders.  Farmers  in  subregion 
93  raise  many  more  hogs  than  slice])  but  the  opposite  is  true  in 
subregion  94. 

The  livestock  farms  m  subregion  103  are  much  like  the  smaller 
livestock  ranches  described  in  Chapter  VI.  These  farms  have  a 
much  larger  acreage  in  pasture  than  cash-grain  farms,  and  a  much 
larger  number  of  cattle  per  farm.  The  cropland  is  used  largely 
for  a  rotation  of  wheat  and  fallow  and  forage  crops  for  winter  feed. 

Grain  sorghum  represents  the  other  important  cash-grain  enter- 
prise in  the  hard  red  winter  wheat  region.  Its  production  in  the 
United  States  is  limited  largely  to  this  region.  Grain-sorghum 
production  is  closely  associated  with  winter  wheat  production,  as 
many  farmers  grow  both  crops.  Some  farmers  use  the  sorghum 
as  another  cash  crop  whereas  others  feed  the  grain  to  livestock. 

The  acreage  of  grain  sorghum  in  the  United  States  has 
fluctuated  between  C  and  1 1  million  acres  per  year.  Grain 
sorghum  is  a  drought-resistant  crop  and  can  be  harvested  with  a 
grain  combine  which  is  common  equipment  in  the  wheat  country. 
In  earlier  years,  grain  sorghum  was  mainly  restricted  to  feeding  on 
farms  where  grown,  and  as  a  basic  ingredient  in  mixed  poultry 
feeds  but  gradually  it  has  become  more  widely  accepted  as  a  feed 
for  fattening  livestock.  Grain  sorghum  is  generally  considered  to 
have  90  to  95  percent  of  the  feed  value  of  corn  by  weight. 

The  leading  States  in  grain-sorghum  production  are  Texas, 
Oklahoma,  Kansas,  Nebraska,  Colorado,  and  New  Mexico.  (See 
table  29.)  In  1954,  in  these  6  States,  more  than  135,000  farmers 
raised  grain  sorghum  on  10.9  million  acres  and  produced  108 
million  bushels  for  sale.  Additional  quantities  were  fed  on  the 
farms  where  raised.  Few  farms  would  be  classed  as  grain-sorghum 
fat  ins  for  usually  the  crop  is  grown  on  farms  where  wheat  is  a  more 
important  crop.  Grain  sorghum  is  well  adapted  to  the  conditions 
in  the  Great  Plains  and  offers  one  of  the  more  promising  alter- 
natives to  individual  wheat  producers. 


Tabic  29. — Acreage  and  Production  of  Grain  Sorghum,  by 
States,  in  the  Major  Producing  States:  1954 


(Dat:i  are  est 

mates  based  on  reports  for  only 

a  sample  of  farms] 

Item 

Texas 

Okla- 
homa 

Kansas 

Nebraska 

Colo- 
rado 

New 
Mexico 

Number  of  farms  in  the 
State 

293. 152 

55,  950 

5,  610,  766 

IS.  495 
8.784 
11.118 
13.  603 
2,606 
1,344 

132,  342.  834 
117,546,674 

119,270 

11.867 
606,  407 

6.  196 
2,669 
1,584 
1,062 
230 
126 

6.  068.  530 
3.  667.  790 

120,  291 
46,  817 

3,551.408 

17,962 
10,777 
8,689 
7.  043 
1,315 
1.031 

49,  912,  097 
32,  375,  634 

100,  733 

16.  829 
514.706 

9,353 
4,497 
2,369 

577 
19 
14 

13,  998,  621 
8,  947,  772 

40, 672 

3,411 

387, 153 

872 
601 
799 
S16 
194 
129 

3,941,131 
2,  724.  378 

20,977 

1,953 

274,  949 

429 

Number  of  farms  pro- 
ducing grain  sorghum  . 

.\  creage  in  grain  sor- 
ghum  

Number  reporting   by 

acres  harvested: 

Under  25  acres 

50-99  acres    . 

100-299  acres 

300-499  acres... 

610 

500  acres  and  over. . .   . 

Quantity  produced 

bushels.. 
Quantity  sold do 

96 

4,  491,  OSS 
3,  539,  871 

THE  HARD  RED  SPRING  WHEAT  REGION 

This  region  lies  in  the  northern  Great  Plains.  Its  major  wheat- 
producing  areas  are  subregions  89,  90,  91,  and  105  (see  fig.  8). 
Although  less  wheat  is  produced  in  this  region  than  in  the  hard 
winter  wheat  region,  it  is  the  major  source  of  income  to  61,000 
farmers  and  many  other  farmers  here  grow  some  wheat.  The  im- 
portance of  wheat  production  in  this  region  and  the  percentage  of 
wheat  produced  on  cash-grain  farms  are  indicated  in  the  following 
data: 


Item 


Total  wheat  produced  on  commercial 
farms  (1.000  bu.) 

Percent  of  U.  S.  total  wheat  produced 
on  commercial  farms 

Percent  of  total  wheat  for  subregion 
produced  on  cash-grain  farms 

Percent  of  total  wheat  for  subregion 
produced  on  farms  other  than  cash- 
grain  farms 


Subregion 

89 

90 

91 

105 

21,142 

36,  325 

16.002 

73,  936 

2 

4 

o 

8 

73 

S6 

60 

89 

27 

14 

40 

11 

Total  (4 
subregions) 


147,  405 
16 
S3 

17 


THE  HARD  SPRING  WHEAT  AREA 
SUBREGIONS  89,  90,  91 ,  AND  1 05 


Figure  8. 


18 


FARMERS  AND  FARM  PRODUCTION 


More  than  four-fifths  of  the  wheat  grown  in  this  area  is  pro- 
duced on  cash-grain  farms. 

This  is  largely  a  spring  wheat  area  because,  in  most  parts,  the 
winters  are  generally  too  severe  for  winter  wheat  to  survive.  The 
severity  of  the  winters  is  the  main  distinguishing  feature  between 
the  hard  spring  and  hard  winter  wheat  area.  (In  central  Montana 
the  Triangle  Area  in  subregion  105,  is  mainly  a  winter  wheat  area. 
This  includes  the  following  counties:  Teton,  Chouteau,  Cascade, 
Judith  Basin,  and  Fergus.  The  counties  directly  north  of  this 
group  also  produce  some  winter  wheat,  but  the  spring  wheat 
acreage  predominates.  The  mountainous  topography  gives  the 
Triangle  Area  enough  protection  to  permit  winter  wheat  to 
succeed.) 

The  spring  wheat  area  produces  both  the  hard  red  spring  wheat 
and  durum  wheat  although  the  former  predominates.  For  the 
10-year  period,  1941-50,  an  average  of  16  million  acres  of  hard  red 
spring  wheat  and  2.6  million  acres  of  durum  wheat  were  produced 
in  the  United  States.2  More  than  80  percent  of  all  durum  wheat 
was  produced  in  North  Dakota,  with  South  Dakota  and  Minne- 
sota contributing  significant  quantities. 

The  soils  of  the  hard  spring  wheat  area  are  fertile  and  deep.  The 
Red  River  Valley  soils  (subregion  89),  are  deep,  fine-textured, 
alluvial  soils.  Most  of  the  soils  in  subregions  90  and  91  belong  to 
the  Northern  Chernozem  group.  These  are  dark,  deep,  fine- 
textured  soils,  well  adapted  for  wheat.  The  soils  in  subregion 
105  belong  in  the  Chestnut  soil  group  which  are  not  quite  so  heavy 
or  so  deep  as  the  Chernozem  soils  but  are,  nevertheless,  good  for 
wheat  production.  As  in  the  hard  winter  wheat  region,  wheat  is 
produced  mainly  on  the  silt  and  silty  clay  loams  that  are  fairly  deep. 
In  the  World  War  periods,  under  the  influences  of  high  prices  for 
wheat,  the  farmers  extended  wheat  production  into  areas  of 
coarser  textured  soils  and  shallower  soils  where  yields  fluctuate 
greatly.  In  periods  of  relatively  low  prices  or  in  years  of  unfavor- 
able moisture,  farmers  in  these  marginal  areas  often  find  their 
costs  exceeding  their  income. 

The  topography  in  the  spring  wheat  region  is  typical  of  the 
Great  Plains — fairly  level  to  undulating.  The  rainfall  in  the  hard 
spring  wheat  area  is  slightly  less  but  evaporation  rates  are  lower 
than  in  the  hard  winter  wheat  area.  Rainfall  averages  from  10 
to  25  inches  annually.  In  subregions  89  and  91  the  annual  rain- 
fall varies  between  20  and  25  inches.  Subregion  90  is  slightly 
drier,  the  average  precipitation  varying  from  15  to  20  inches.  The 
driest  part  of  this  region  is  subregion  105  where  the  annual  pre- 
cipitation averages  from  10  to  20  inches.  In  all  of  the  hard  wheat 
region,  the  rainfall  and  humidity  are  sufficiently  low,  especially  in 
the  maturing  period,  to  produce  a  hard  kernel.  About  three- 
fourths  of  the  rainfall  occurs  during  the  growing  season;  the  rain- 
fall is  much  heavier  in  the  spring  and  early  summer  than  during 
the  harvest  period  in  late  summer. 

The  low  annual  rainfall  usually  necessitates  summer-fallowing. 
Considering  evaporation  and  run-off,  10  to  15  inches  of  rainfall  is 
not  enough  to  produce  satisfactory  yields.  In  many  instances, 
farmers  can  double  the  yields  by  summer-fallowing.  But  it  is  not 
necessary  to  double  the  yield  to  make  fallowing  profitable.  Under 
this  practice  wheat  harvesting  is  required  only  once  in  2  years. 
The  fallowing  practices  serve  as  seedbed  preparation.  Operating 
costs  for  the  2  years,  1  year  of  fallow  and  1  year  of  wheat,  will 
exceed  the  operating  costs  for  1  year  of  continuous  cropping,  but 
will  usually  be  considerably  less  than  the  operating  costs  for  2 
years  of  continuous  wheat.  This  is  important  to  the  wheat- 
farmer  in  the  low-rainfall  area.  He  increases  the  chance  of  pro- 
ducing a  crop  and  at  the  same  time  reduces  the  cost  of  operation. 

=  Source:  Agricultural  Statistics  -  1953,  U.  S.  D.  A. 


The  wheat  and  summer-fallow  acreages  on   cash-grain  farms  by 
subregions  for  1954  were  as  follows: 

Subregion 


89  90 

Wheat  (1,000  acres) 1,063  3,875 

Summer     fallow     (1,000 

acres) 645  2,459 


91 
964 

206 


105 
4,229 


Total 
10,  131 


4,  462       7,  772 

Not  all  the  summer-fallow  land  is  used  to  grow  wheat;  some  is 
used  for  other  small  grains. 

Marketing  and  transportation  facilities  are  adequate  here.  As 
in  the  hard  winter  wheat  area,  mainline  railroads  and  hard- 
surfaced  highways  transect  the  country  and  farm-to-market  roads 
are  adequate  for  hauling  the  grain  to  market.  Storage  and  han- 
dling facilities  are  short  of  the  needs  during  the  peak  harvest  seasons, 
but  storage  space  has  increased  sharply  in  the  period  following 
World  War  II. 

Many  characteristics  of  the  wheat  farms  in  the  hard  spring 
wheat  region  are  similar  to  those  of  the  hard  winter  wheat  regions. 
The  farms  in  this  region  can  be  described  as  large  family-type 
units  with  a  high  average  investment  per  farm. 

But  there  are  significant  differences.  A  comparison  of  the  hard 
winter  wheat  farms  with  the  hard  spring  wheat  farms  shows  that 
the  spring  wheat  farms  have  a  slightly  lower  average  total  invest- 
ment due  largely  to  higher  land  values  per  acre.  A  considerably 
larger  proportion  of  the  farms  had  gross  sales  of  less  than  $5,000 
in  most  of  the  spring  wheat  subregions. 

Farms  in  the  spring  wheat  region  have  higher  machinery  in- 
vestment, more  land,  more  available  labor  (see  table  31),  more 
tractors,  trucks,  and  combines.  The  cash-grain  farmers  in  the 
winter  wheat  area  specialized  in  wheat,  in  1954,  to  a  higher  de- 
gree than  spring  wheat  farmers  with  the  exception  of  those  in 
subregion  105.  Flax,  barley,  and  corn  are  among  the  other  im- 
portant cash  and  feed  grains  produced  in  this  region. 

Table  30.- — A  Comparison  of  the  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  the 
Hard  Winter  and  Hard  Spring  Wheat  Subregions: 
1954 


Hard  winter  wheat 
subregions 

Hard 

spring  wheat  subregions 

93 

94 

103 

89 

90 

91 

105 

Total  acres  per  farm 

Crop  acres  per  farm 

Capital  investment  per 
farm  (dollars): 
Land  and  buildings 

358 
258 

33,  745 
2.817 
8.023 

362 
264 

44,  520 
2.  283 
7.949 

S20 
607 

55,  367 
3,  040 
10,  832 

435 
378 

31,  144 

1,710 

11,748 

696 
535 

23.  926 
2,856 
11,663 

569 
442 

25,  503 
3.  513 
10,  624 

1,304 
769 

45.  177 
3.927 

12.  220 

Total 

Man-  Mjuivalent  per  farm 
Percent    of    gross    sales 

44,  585 
1.2 
40 

54.752 
1.  1 
75 

69,  239 
1.3 

54 

44,  602 
1.4 
29 

38,  445 
1.4 
38 

39.640 
1.3 
31 

61,  324 
1.3 
74 

In  comparing  the  subregions  within  the  spring  wheat  region, 
and  the  farmers  in  subregion  by  economic  class,  it  is  again  neces- 
sary to  consider  the  influence  of  yields.  The  5-year  average 
yields  of  wheat  were  as  follows:  Subreqion 

5-year     average     vield     (1949-1953)       s^         90         91         105 

(bushels  per  acre) 16.5     11.2       9.8       18.0 

1954  yield  (bushels  per  acre) 14.6       8.0       9.9       15.5 

The  lower  than  average  yields  in  1954  for  all  but  one  subregion 
had  some  effect  on  the  distribution  of  farmers  by  economic  class 
of  farm. 


WHEAT  PRODUCERS  AND  WHEAT  PRODUCTION 


19 


Size  of  Business 

Then-  is  a  wide  range  in  the  size  of  cash-grain  farms  among  parts 
of  the  spring  wheat  region.  (See  tables  31,  32,  33,  and  34.)  In 
the  Red  River  Valley  of  North  Dakota  and  Minnesota,  the  farms 
average  one-third  the  acreage  in  the  wheat  farms  in  subregion  105 
in  Montana  and  are  considerably  smaller  than  those  in  the  Dakotas 
(subregions  00  and  01).  When  measured  by  total  investment, 
the  Red  River  Valley  farms  rank  lower  than  those  in  subregion  105, 
but  higher  than  those  in  subregions  90  and  91.  In  terms  of  man- 
equivalent,  the  farms  in  subregion  89  rank  highest ,  because  of  more 
intensive  farming  and  greater  diversification. 

The  relationship  of  the  size  of  farm  business  in  subregion  89  to 
the  economic  class  is  fairly  typical  of  the  pattern  in  other  sub- 
regions.  The  smaller  farmers  as  a  group  are  seriously  handicapped 
by  lack  of  resources.  It  is  doubtful  that  the  farm  operator  can 
use  his  time  efficiently  on  the  small-size  units. 


Table  31. 


-Size  of  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  89,  by 
Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Item 

Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Number  ol  farms 

Total  acrrs  per  farm.  ._  . 
Crop  acres  per  farm  ..    .. 

Capital  investment   per 
farm : 
Land   and   buildings 
dollars 

Livestock dollars.. 

Machinery    .  .  dollars. . 

13,280 

13.5 
378 

31.144 

1.710 

11,748 

363 
1.433 
1,324 

111,695 

3,  052 
30,  104 

2.  552 
678 
614 

52.  429 
2,  563 
16,  724 

4,  679 
131 
376 

30,  562 
1,893 
11,785 

3.  .540 
300 
247 

19.  731 

1.288 
9,377 

1.678 
224 

171 

12.  965 

873 

7,002 

488 

167 
105 

6,  S76 

3S3 

4,954 

Total   ..   ...dollars  . 
Man-equivalent  per  farm. 

44.  602 
14 

144,851 
3  o 

71,716 
1   7 

44,  240 
1.4 

30.306 

1.2 

20,  840 
1.0 

12,213 
0.9 

Table  32. — Size  of  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  90,  by 
Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Economic  class  of  farm 

Item 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Number  of  farms    

24.  389 

101 

3. 151 

8,154 

8,617 

3,  3.58 

918 

Total  acres  per  farm 

f>96 

2 

446 

1,  180 

785 

560 

382 

313 

Crop  acres  per  farm. 

535 

1 

976 

944 

604 

410 

284 

220 

Capital  investment   pet- 

farm  ; 

Land  and  buildincs 

dollars.. 

23,  926 

88 

321) 

43,  480 

26,  619 

IS,  384 

12,  366 

1(1.  202 

Livestock dollars. . 

2,  856 

K 

4114 

4.912 

3.  520 

2,  251 

1.  16.5 

CIS 

Machinery.  _   .dollars . . 

11,663 

_,,, 

415 

17.  957 

12,  957 

10,  430 

7.  819 

6,364 

Total dollars.. 

38,  +45 

126 

139 

66.  349 

43,  096 

31,065 

21,350 

17,274 

Man-equivalent  per  farm- 

1.4 

3,0 

1.8 

1.5 

1.2 

1.0 

1   6 

Table  33. — Size  of  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  91,  by 
Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Item 

Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Number  of  farms 

Total  acres  per  farm .   

Crop  acres  per  farm 

Capital  investment  per 
farm : 
Land  and  buildings 
dollars 

Livestock dollars 

Machinery dollars 

8,687 
.569 
412 

2.5.  .503 
3,  513 
10,624 

130 
2.097 
1.646 

S7.  190 
10.  253 
24.  323 

1,372 
930 

757 

44,  989 
6,  023 
15,  457 

2,922 
607 
469 

26,  995 
4,067 
11,197 

2,906 
426 
321 

17,930 
2,  .54.5 
9,326 

1,086 
293 

218 

11,340 
1.338 
6,  343 

271 
234 
185 

8,915 

688 

4,474 

Total dollars.  . 

Man-e'iuivalentpcr  farm. 

.lo,.,ln 
1.3 

121.  766 
2.6 

66,  469 
1,6 

42,  259 
1,  1 

29,  801 
1,2 

10.  021 

III 

14.077 
10 

Table  34. — Size  of  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  105,  by 
Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Item 

Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Number  of  farms 

Total  acres  per  farm 
Crop  acres  per  farm 

Capital  investment  per 
farm : 
Land  and  buildings 
dollars 

Livestock dollars. . 

Machinery...  .dollars  . 

15.071 

1.304 

769 

45.  177 
3,  '.127 
12,  220 

1.317 
3.281 

2,  077 

137,  276 

7,281 

23,  472 

3,609 
1,786 

1,0.54 

65, 182 
5.172 
15,  125 

4,173 
1,179 

668 

35,  546 
4.314 
11.515 

3,775 

761 
440 

22.  253 
2,  675 
9,476 

1,709 
.524 
291 

14,096 
1,410 
7,079 

488 
408 
202 

11,  335 

871 

5,636 

Total dollars 

Man-equivalent  per  farm 

61,  324 
1.3 

ins.  iijo 
2.2 

8.5,   170 
1,5 

51,  375 
1.3 

34,  404 

1   1 

22,  ,5s:, 
0.9 

17.842 
0.8 

The  distribution  of  cash-grain  farmers  by  economic  class  is 
shown  by  subregions  in  table  35.  Also,  the  percentage  of  total 
wheat  produced  by  cash-grain  farms  in  each  economic  class  is 
shown.  The  percentage  of  farmers  in  Classes  IV,  V,  and  VI  is 
considerably  higher  than  in  the  hard  winter  wheat  region  (see 
table  12).  More  than  half  of  the  fanes  are  in  Classes  III  and  IV 
while  more  than  half  the  farms  are  in  Classes  II  and  III  in  tin- 
hard  winter  wheat  region.  In  subregion  105,  the  percentage  of 
lanes  in  Classes  I  and  II  is  materially  higher  than  in  the  other 
subregions  in  the  hard  spring  wheat  region.  The  Classes  V  and 
VI  farms  produce  a  small  percentage  of  the  wheat  in  the  sub- 
regions  because  of  relatively  small  wheal  acreages  and  low  yields. 

Table  35. — Percent  Distribution  of  Cash-Grain  Farms  and 
Wheat  Produced,  by  Economic  Class  for  the  Hard  Spring 
Wheat  Region:  1954 


Item  and  subregion 


Number  of  farms: 
Subregion: 

so 

90 

91 

105 

Wheat  production 
Subregion: 

89 

90 

91 

105. 


Economic  class  of  farnt 


Percell 

of  total 

in  the  su 

bregion 

2.7 

19.2 

35.3 

26.7 

12.6 

.8 

12.9 

33.4 

35.3 

13.8 

1.5 

15.8 

33.6 

33.5 

12.5 

8.7 

23.9 

27.9 

25.0 

11  3 

12.2 

36,  8 

33.4 

13.9 

3.4 

4.5 

28.3 

38.3 

22.8 

5.3 

9.2 

33.8 

33.6 

18.8 

4.0 

35.6 

35  5 

18.0 

8.5 

2  1 

3.5 
3.8 

3    1 
3.2 


Crop  and  Livestock  Organization 

land  use  and  crops  grown. — Although  the  Red  River  Valley 
and  the  States  of  North  Dakota,  South  Dakota,  and  .Montana 
are  generally  recognized  as  comprising  the  spring  wheat  region, 
other  crops  are  grown  here.  Cash-grain  farms  in  subregions  Si). 
90,  and  91  are  diversified.  The  fact  that  acreage  allotments  for 
wheat  were  in  effect  in  195-1  may  have  had  a  greater  effect,  on 
land  use  in  this  than  in  the  hard  winter  wheat  region.  Notwith- 
standing an  increase  during  the  last  5  years  in  acreage  of  crop- 
land per  farm  in  each  subregion,  the  acreage  of  wheat  in  1954  in 
each  was  less  than  in  1949. 


Suhregion 


Crop  acres  per  farm : 

1954 

1949 

Acres  in  wheat  per  farm: 

1954 

1949 


S9 

:!7S 

358 

SO 
110 


90 

535 

504 

159 
212 


91 

442 

425 

111 

150 


10b 

To:  i 
721 

281 
329 


20 


FARMERS  AND  FARM  PRODUCTION 


This  region  is  also  the  leading  flax-producing  area  in  the  United 
States.  Considerable  acreages  of  barley  and  oats  are  produced 
also.  At  one  time  the  Red  River  Valley  was  well  known  for  its 
potatoes  but  the  relative  importance  of  this  crop  has  declined. 
Land  use  by  subregions  and  economic  class  of  farm  is  shown  in 
tables  36,  37,  38,  and  39. 

In  subregion  89,  wheat  was  not  the  major  crop  in  1954;  the 
acreage  in  wheat  was  exceeded  by  the  acreage  in  barley.  Wheat 
was  relatively  more  important  in  1954  in  subregions  90,  91,  and 
105,  as  these  areas  have  fewer  alternative  opportunities  for  land 
use.  Flax  and  oats  or  barley  were  dominant  crops  in  subregions 
90  and  91.  Some  corn  was  produced,  especially  in  subregion  91. 
Barley  was  the  main  competitor  of  wheat  in  subregion  105  bvit 
was  less  important  than  wheat  in  the  other  subregions. 

The  relative  importance  of  summer-fallowing  declines  from  west 
to  east  in  the  hard  spring  wheat  region.  The  acreage  of  pasture 
per  farm  and  the  percentage  of  the  total  farm  area  that  is  in 
pasture  vary  significantly  among  subregions  within  the  region. 
The  Red  River  Valley  cropland  comprises  almost  the  entire  farm 
acreage.  In  subregions  90  and  91  approximately  one-sixth  of  the 
land  is  in  pasture  and  in  subregion  105  about  two-fifths  of  the 
laud  in  cash-grain  farms  is  in  permanent  pasture. 

Farmers  in  the  various  economic  classes  have  approximately 
the  same  type-of-cropping  system.  In  each  subregion  there  are 
differences  which  may  have  affected  gross  sales.  In  subregion  89 
the  Class  VI  farms  were  lower  than  the  Class  I  farms  in  propor- 
tion of  cropland  in  wheat  and  barley  but  much  higher  in  the 
proportion  of  cropland  in  oats.  In  subregion  90  the  Class  VI  farms 
were  lower  than  farms  in  other  classes  in  proportion  of  cropland 
in  flax  and  higher  in  the  proportion  in  oats.  Class  VI  farms  in 
subregion  91  were  relatively  lower  in  the  percentage  of  the  crop 
acreage  in  wheat  and  much  higher  in  the  percentage  in  oats  than 
Class  I  farms.  In  subregion  105  the  Class  VI  farms  were  rela- 
tively lower  than  other  farms  in  the  proportion  of  cropland  in 
barley.  These  differences  in  the  relative  importance  of  various 
small  grain  crops  may  explain  some  differences  in  gross  income. 

Table  36. — Land  Use  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  89, 
by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Item 

Percent 
of  farms 
report- 
ing 

Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

13, 280 

435 
378 
80 
46 
83 
40 
32 
33 

363 

1,433 

1.324 

307 

165 

328 

74 

101 

58 

2,552 

678 
614 
136 
81 
143 
52 
52 
40 

4,679 

431 
376 
80 
43 
82 
42 
32 
33 

3,540 

300 
247 
4S 
28 
51 
33 
21 
29 

1,678 

224 
171 
32 
20 
31 
26 
13 
23 

468 

Acres  per  farm: 
All  land 

100 
100 
(NA> 
70 
88 
71 
42 
67 

167 

105 

Wheat 

13 

Flax.. 

10 

17 

21 

6 

24 

NA  Not  available. 


Table  37- — Land  Use  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  90, 
by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Item 

Percent 
of  farms 
report- 
ing 

Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

1 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

24, 389 

696 
535 
159 
70 
64 
34 
11 
101 
125 

191 

2.  446 

1,976 

570 

330 

276 

75 

58 

433 

359 

3,151 

1,180 
944 
275 
142 
121 
49 
22 
186 
185 

8,154 

784 

604 

180 

81 

71 

38 

14 

111 

143 

8,617 

560 
419 
127 

47 
49 
31 

7 
76 
108 

3,358 

382 
284 
83 
33 
30 
20 
3 
54 
73 

918 

Acres  per  farm: 
All  land 

100 
100 
(NA) 
78 
74 
71 
32 
84 
82 

314 

220 

Wheat 

67 

Flax    

16 

23 

Oats    . 

16 

1 

46 

67 

Table  38. — Land  Use  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  91 
by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Item 

Percent 
of  farms 
report- 
ing 

Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

8,687 

569 
442 
111 
71 
55 
49 
24 
105 

130 

2,097 
1,646 
572 
168 
224 
li.li 
114 
341 

1,372 

930 
757 
208 
100 
110 
75 
44 
150 

2,922 

607 
469 
111 
77 
60 
53 
24 
116 

2,906 

426 
321 
74 
61 
35 
37 
15 
85 

1.086 

293 

218 
48 
44 
20 
27 
11 
60 

271 

Acres  per  farm: 
All  land 

100 
100 

(NA) 
91 
77 
64 
40 
82 

234 

185 

Wheat    

44 

Oats 

Corn 

34 
14 

Flax 

23 

13 

36 

NA  Not  available. 


Table  39. — Land  Use  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  105, 
by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Item 

Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Number  of  farms 

Acres  per  farm: 
All  land... 

15,  071 

1,304 
769 

65 
215 

65 
296 

512 

1,317 

3,281 
2,077 

381 
366 
225 
939 
1,169 

3,609 

1,785 
1.054 

101 
282 
97 
443 
696 

4,  173 

1.179 
668 

21 
228 

45 
228 

487 

3,775 

761 
440 

7 
155 
28 
132 
307 

1,709 

524 
291 

3 
103 

17 

86 

221 

488 
408 

Cropland 

Wheat: 

202 
1 

Spring... 

69 

13 

Summer  fallow 

Land  pastured 

61 
195 

Livestock. — The  kinds  of  livestock  kept  on  farms  is  fairly 
uniform  throughout  the  spring  wheat  region.  (See  tables  40,  41, 
42,  and  43.)  The  number  of  cattle  on  individual  farms  varies 
with  the  amount  of  pasture  available.  The  typical  poultry  flock 
is  small,  kept  mainly  for  production  for  home  use.  Average  hog 
and  sheep  numbers  per  farm  are  small  because  many  farmers  do 
not  keep  them.  However,  the  average  number  on  farms  report- 
ing sheep  and  hogs  is  much  larger  than  that  shown  as  the  average 
for  all  farms.  This  is  especially  true  for  sheep.  Even  milk-cow 
numbers  are  larger  on  many  farms  that  have  cows  for  the  pro- 
duction of  marketable  quantities  of  dairy  products.  Many  wheat 
farmers  in  the  more  arid  parts  do  not  keep  cows  for  family  use. 
The  percentage  of  farmers  reporting  each  class  of  livestock  and 
the  number  per  farm  reporting  are  shown  in  tables  40  to  43. 


Table  40. — Livestock  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  89, 
by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Percent 

Economic  class  of  farm 

report- 
ing 

Total 

1 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

13,  280 

363 

2,552 

4.679 

3,540 

1,678 

468 

Livestock,  number  per  farm: 
All  cattle.  

67 
56 
37 
9 
54 

13 
4 

6 
6 

79 

24 
3 
12 
11 
68 

20 
4 
10 
11 
93 

15 
4 

6 
91 

11 
3 
3 
3 

77 

2 
4 

44 

3 

1 

1 

1 

Chickens 

20 

Gross  sales  of  livestock  and 

livestock     products     per 
farm ...dollars.. 

XXX 

1,  156 

2,852 

1,964 

1,304 

718 

367 

105 

Investment  in  livestock  per 
farm dollars.. 

XXX 

1,710 

3,  052 

2,563 

1,893 

1,288 

873 

383 

NA  Not  available. 


WHEAT  PRODUCERS  AND  WHEAT  PRODUCTION 


21 


Table  41. — Livestock  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  90, 
by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Percent 
of  farms 
report- 
ins 

Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

24,  389 

25 
5 
5 

54 

1,  215 
2,856 

191 

74 
3 
15 
32 
47 

4,434 
8,404 

3,151 

43 
6 
9 
15 
66 

2,381 
4,912 

8,154 

31 
6 
6 
8 

64 

1,526 
3,520 

8,617 

20 
5 
4 
4 

53 

869 
2,251 

3,  358 

10 
3 
1 
1 

35 

363 

1,165 

918 

Livestock,  number  per  farm: 
All  cattle 

74 
64 

41 
9 
62 

XXX 
XXX 

5 

1 

1 

1 

18 

Gross  sales  of  livestock  ami 
livestock    products     per 
farm- dollars.. 

Investment  in  livestock  per 
farm dollars.- 

155 
618 

Tabic  42. — Livestock  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  91, 
by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Percent 

of  farms 
report- 
ing 

Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

8,687 

30 
4 

14 

9 

101 

1.698 
3,  513 

130 

78 
2 
50 
71 
94 

8,591 
10.  253 

1,372 

50 
3 
27 
18 
127 

3,326 
6,023 

2,922 

35 
4 
16 
10 
121 

1,935 
4,067 

2,906 

22 
4 
9 
5 

94 

1,001 
2,545 

1,086 

12 
3 
4 
1 

54 

439 
1,338 

271 

Livestock,  number  per  farm: 

All  cattle - 

Milk  cows.. 

76 
56 
45 
Hi 
67 

X  X  X 
XXX 

6 
1 
1 

4 

37 

Gross  sales  of  livestock  and 
livestock  products  per 
farm  dollars.. 

Investment  in  livestock  per 
farm.  - dollars.. 

126 
688 

Table  43. — Livestock  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  105, 
by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Item 


Percent 
of  farms 
report' 

ing 


Number  of  farms 

Livestock,      number      per 
farm: 

All  cattle 

Milk  cows... 

Hops 

Sheep 

Chickens 


I  Iross  sales  of  livestock  and 
livestock  products  per 
farm .  - dollars . 

Investment  in  livestock  per 
farm dollars- 


Economic  class  of  farm 


XXX 

X  X  X 


Total 


15.071 


1,329 
3,196 


2,  749 
7.260 


1,840 
5,171 


III 


1,458 
4.316 


TV 


3.775 


805 
2,  665 


23 


341 
1.407 


488 


(z) 


131 

697 


z  Less  than  0.5. 


It  is  significant  that  in  each  subregion  the  number  of  milk  cows 
and  chickens  per  farm  is  highest,  in  the  middle  economic  groups, 
Classes  II  to  IV.  It  is  probable  that  some  of  the  operators  of 
these  farms  keep  milk  cows  and  chickens  to  provide  some  food 
for  the  family  and  to  help  reduce  cash  expenses  for  family  living. 
Products  not  needed  by  the  family  are  sold.  Class  I  farmers 
probably  feel  less  need  for  limiting  cash  expenditures  for  family 
living:  but  Class  V  and  VI  farmers  who  may  have  the  greatest 
need  for  additional  income  and  for  limiting  living  costs,  also  have 


fewer  milk  cows  and  chickens.  The  large  percentage  of  fanners 
in  the  youngest  and  oldest  age  groups  may  explain  partly  the 
small  number  of  cows  and  chickens  on  the  small  farms.  The 
beginning  operators  may  be  handicapped  by  a  shortage  of  capital 
while  the  operators  over  65  years  may  not  wish  to  be  burdened 
with  livestock  chores. 

Labor  Used 

Most  of  the  labor  used  on  cash-grain  farms  in  this  region  is 
supplied  by  the  farm  families  (see  table  44).  With  the  exception 
of  the  relatively  small  number  of  Class  I  farms,  the  organization 
of  most  farms  is  planned  around  the  farm  family.  (Many  of  the 
Class  I  farms  would  be  classified  as  family  farms.)  Hired  labor 
constitutes  only  a  small  part  of  the  labor  force  on  all  except  the 
Class  I  farms. 


Table  44. — Labor  Force  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  the  Hard 
Spring  Wheat  Region,  and  for  Subregion  90  by  Economic 
Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Item 

Subregion 

Economic  class  of  farm  for 
subregion  90 

89 

90 

91 

105 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Total  man-equivalent-.. 

1.4 

1.4 

1.3 

1.3 

3.0 

1.8 

1.5 

1.2 

1.0 

1.0 

Operator 

Unpaid  familv  help... 
Hired 

Operators  by  age: 
All  operators. percent.. 

.9 
.3 
.2 

100 

.9 
.3 
.2 

100 

.8 
.3 
2 

100 

.8 
.2 
.3 

100 

.9 

.4 
1.7 

100 

.9 

.  5 
.4 

100 

.9 
.4 
_  o 

100 

.8 
.3 
.1 

100 

.8 
.2 

m 

100 

.8 
.2 
(z) 

100 

Under  25  years,  do 

25-34  years do 

35-64  years do 

65  years  and  over-do. . 

2 
17 
69 
12 

3 

20 
68 
9 

4 
24 

62 
10 

4 

20 
64 
12 

2 
20 
73 

5 

2 
19 

74 
5 

3 
23 
69 

5 

3 
20 
68 

9 

5 
15 
61 
19 

4 
10 
59 
27 

z  Less  than  0.05. 

On  most  farms  all  the  operators'  labor  is  allocated  to  the  farm 
business  as  opportunities  for  off-farm  work  are  very  limited. 
There  was  considerable  difference  in  the  amount  of  labor  hired  on 
Class  I  farms  in  the  four  subregions.  The  man-equivalent  of  hired 
labor  for  Class  I  farms  was  by  subregion  as  follows:  subregion 
89,  2.3:  subregion  90,  1.7;  subregion  91,  1.5;  and  subregion  105, 
1.1.  Labor  requirements  per  acre  are  higher  in  the  Red  River 
Valley  than  in  Montana,  for  Montana  farmers  use  larger  machinery 
than  is  generally  used  on  more  diversified  farms.  Subregion  89, 
with  the  smallest  farms  when  measured  in  acres  of  land,  had  the 
largest  number  of  workers  per  farm.  The  amount  of  family  help 
used  was  about  the  same  for  subregions  89,  90,  and  91,  but  was 
smaller  for  all  economic  classes  in  subregion  105.  Less  diversifi- 
cation and  greater  seasonality  of  the  work  may  be  the  reason-  for 
less  unpaid  family  help  per  farm  in  subregion  105. 

The  percentage  of  farm  operators  that  are  under  35  years  of  age 
is  low  relative  to  the  percentage  in  other  age  groups  in  all  sub- 
regions  and  is  lower  in  subregion  89  than  in  the  other  subregions. 
This  is  true  for  all  economic  classes  of  farms.  It  indicates  that  in 
the  coming  years  either  the  rate  of  decrease  in  number  of  farms 
will  be  abnormally  high  or  that  an  unusually  high  percentage  of 
the  farms  will  be  operated  by  older  men.  The  percentage  of 
operators  of  Class  VI  farms  who  are  65  is  high  especially  in  sub- 
region  105  where  37  percent  of  Class  VI  operators  an'  more  than 
(15  years  >>f  age. 


22 


FARMERS  AND  FARM  PRODUCTION 


Farm  Mechanization  and  Home  Conveniences 

The  cash-grain  farms  in  the  spring  wheat  region  are  highly 
mechanized.  This  has  been  true  for  several  decades.  Wheat 
farmers  were  one  of  the  first  groups  to  shift  to  motive  power,  for 
the  large  fields  of  fairly  level  land  are  excellent  for  the  use  of  large- 
size  modern  machinery.  The  degree  of  mechanization  and  use  of 
modern  home  conveniences  is  shown  by  data  in  table  45. 

Table  45. — Farm  Mechanization  and  Home  Conveniences 
on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  the  Hard  Spring  Wheat  Region, 
and  for  Sub-region  91  by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


it™ 


Number  of  farms 

Number  per  farm: 

Automobiles 

Motortrucks 

Tractors 

Combines 

Percent  of  farms  report- 
ing: 

Automobiles 

Motortrucks 

Tractors 

Combines 

Corn  pickers 

Field  forage  harvesters 

Telephones 

Electricity 

Television  sets 

Piped  water  in  home- 
Home  freezer 


Subregion 


13,280 


1.2 
1.2 
2.  1 


24.  389 


1.2 
1.1 
1.9 
.9 


S.  GS7 


1.2 
1.6 
1.9 


Economic  class  of  farm  for 
subregion  91 


105 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

15.071 

130 

1,372 

2,922 

2.906 

1,  0S6 

1.2 

2.  1 

1.4 

1.2 

1.1 

1.0 

1.7 

2.4 

1.8 

1.0 

0.8 

0.5 

1.9 

3.9 

2.7 

2.0 

1.7 

1.2 

1.0 

1.6 

1.0 

.9 

.7 

.5 

HO 

97 

96 

92 

91 

85 

92 

94 

92 

83 

73 

48 

9fi 

98 

98 

97 

96 

84 

80 

95 

88 

SI 

69 

46 

4 

70 

60 

41 

29 

15 

7 

28 

19 

10 

4 

1 

30 

68 

67 

55 

50 

36 

85 

95 

96 

94 

89 

76 

10 

19 

25 

18 

15 

8 

51 

88 

82 

65 

46 

36 

52 

61 

55 

40 

28 

16 

271 


.7 

.4 

1.0 

.3 


63 
35 
82 
26 


23 

56 

7 

32 

8 


In  subregion  105  a  relatively  high  percentage  of  farmers  own 
trucks  and  there  is  a  higher  than  average  number  of  trucks  per 
farm  than  in  the  other  subregions.  Tractor  numbers  also  varied 
by  subregion  and  by  economic  class  of  farm.  The  percentage 
of  farms  in  each  class  reporting  tractors  was  fairly  uniform  but 
the  number  of  tractors  per  farm  varied  by  economic  class  of  farm 
as  shown  by  the  following  data: 


Subregion 

Number    of    tractors    per    farm    by 
economic  class 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

89 

4.4 
4.0 
3.9 
3.1 

2.8 
2.7 
2.7 
2.3 

2.1 
2.0 
2.0 

1.9 

1.6 
1.6 

1.7 

1.6 

1.4 
1.3 

1.2 
1.2 

1.1 

90     

1.1 

91   . 

1.0 

105 

1.1 

The  more  diversified  areas  (subregions  89  and  91)  had  the 
largest  number  of  tractors  per  farm.  On  diversified  farms  more 
than  one  operation  requiring  power  must  frequently  be  performed 
on  the  same  day,  thus  the  operators  of  these  farms  need  more 
power  units.  Typically  the  power  units  on  diversified  farms  are 
smaller  than  on  farms  in  subregion  105. 

The  use  of  home  conveniences  is  much  more  related  to  the 
economic  class  of  farm  than  the  particular  part  of  the  wheat 
region  in  which  the  farm  is  located.  Almost  without  exception 
the  lower  a  group  of  farmers  ranks  in  gross  sales,  the  lower  is  the 
percentage  of  the  farmers  having  modern  home  conveniences. 
The  small  percentage  of  the  lower  income  groups  reporting  tele- 
phones, electricity,  home  freezers,  and  piped  water  in  the  home, 
is  a  good  indicator  of  the  differences  in  levels  of  living  among 
farmers  in  the  economic  classes.  However,  it  may  be  expected 
that  telephones  and  electricity  would  be  less  common  in  the 
sparsely  settled  parts  of  Montana  and  the  western  part  of  the 
Dakotas   than    in    the    Red    River    Valley.     Home    conveniences 


were  more  common  in  the  hard  winter  wheat  region  than  in  the 
hard  spring  wheat  region. 

Gross  Farm  Income 

The  sources  and  amount  of  farm  income  indicate  the  farm 
organization  and  the  relative  importance  of  different  enterprises 
(see  table  46).  In  the  Red  River  Valley  where  wheat  was  not  the 
dominant  crop,  farmers  had  several  important  sources  of  income. 
In  the  central  part  of  the  Dakotas,  wheat  was  the  major  source 
of  income  but  livestock  and  livestock  products  were  important. 
In  subregion  105,  in  western  North  Dakota  and  Montana,  wheat 
provided  three-fourths  of  the  gross  sales. 

Table  46. — Sources  of  Farm  Income  on  Cash-Grain  Farms 
in  the  Hard  Spring  Wheat  Region,  and  for  Subregion 
105  by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Item 

Subregion 

Economic  class  of  farm  for 
subregion  105 

89 

90 

91 

105 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

3,775 

2.  650 
162 
342 

V 

VI 

13.280 

2.262 
1.  080 
3,260 

24,  389 

2,341 
1.165 
1,417 

8,687 

2,111 
739 

2,289 

15,  071 

8,251 

166 

1,395 

1,317 

34,  172 

108 

6,553 

3,609 

12,  393 

159 

2,157 

4,173 

5,261 
240 
699 

1,709 

1,388 

91 

203 

488 

Sales  per  farm: 

Wheat dollars. . 

Flax. ...do 

Other  crops do 

590 
46 
122 

All  crops do 

Livestock  and  live- 
stock products 

dollars.. 

6,602 
1.156 

4,923 
1,215 

5.  139 
1.698 

9,812 
1,329 

40,833 
2,749 

14.  709 

1:840 

6,  200 
1,458 

3.154 
805 

1,682 
341 

758 
131 

Gross  sales 

dollars.. 

Percentage  of  gross  sales 

7,759 

29 
20.54 

6.138 

38 
11.48 

6,838 

31 
15.46 

11,142 

74 
14.  49 

43,587 

78 
20.98 

16,  549 

75 
20.70 

7,658 

69 
11.46 

3,958 

67 
8.99 

2,023 

69 
6.96 

889 
66 

Gross  sales  per  crop  acre 

dollars.. 

4.39 

Gross  sales  per  crop  acre  were  highest  in  the  more  diversified 
area  (subregion  89) ;  here  the  yields  are  the  highest  in  the  area. 
The  differences  in  sales  per  crop  acre  in  the  other  subregions  are 
the  result  of  differences  in  crop  yields,  in  1954.  In  subregion  105, 
the  Class  I  farmers  (about  10  percent  of  all  cash-grain  farmers  in 
the  subregion)  had  gross  sales  exceeding  $40,000.  These  were 
the  large  wheat  farmers. 

The  percentage  of  gross  sales  on  cash-grain  farms  that  came  from 
wheat  varied  by  subregions  and  by  economic  class  as  follows: 


Subregion 

Wheat  sales  as  a  percentage  of  gross 
sales  by  economic  class 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

89 

29 
42 
40 
78 

30 
39 
34 
75 

29 
37 
30 
69 

29 
37 
31 
67 

26 
39 
30 
69 

15 

90 

42 

91 

33 

105  

66 

The  importance  of  wheat  as  a  source  of  income  differs  little 
by  the  economic  class  in  subregion  90,  but  declines  from  Class  I 
to  Class  VI  in  the  other  subregions.  This  was  especially  true  in 
subregion  91  where  Class  VI  farmers  obtain  a  relatively  small 
income  from  wheat 

Livestock  sales  are  relatively  important  for  farms  in  Economic 
Classes  II,  III,  and  IV  but  are  less  important  for  farms  in  Classes 
V  and  VI.  The  pattern  of  the  source  of  income  by  economic 
class  of  farm  was  similar  for  all  subregions  in  the  hard  spring  wheat 
region  and  in  the  winter  wheat  region 


WHEAT  PRODUCERS  AND  WHEAT  PRODUCTION 


23 


Farm  Expenses 

As  in  other  wheat  regions  machine  hire  was  the  highest  in  the 
subregions  having  the  largest  acreages  per  farm.  (See  tables  47, 
4S,  49,  and  50.)  Frequently  operators  of  the  larger  farms  own 
one  or  two  combines  but  hire  additional  machines  to  speed  up 
harvest.  In  the  localities  of  high  hail  risk,  the  harvesting  of 
wheat  is  completed  as  rapidly  as  possible.  Some  of  the  larger 
operators  have  found  that  they  can  hire  the  combining  for  less 
cost  than  if  they  operated  their  own  machines. 

Expenditures  per  crop  acre  for  gas  and  oil  may  be  expected  to 
decline  with  a  decrease  in  intensity  of  operation.  However,  only 
in  subregion  105  is  there  a  correlation  between  size  of  farm  and  the 
cost  of  fuel  and  oil  per  acre.  Here  the  larger  farms  had  consider- 
ably lower  costs  per  crop  acre  than  the  smaller  farms. 

Ths  amount  spent  per  crop  acre  for  hired  labor  was  approxi- 
mately twice  as  large  in  subregion  SO  as  in  the  other  subregions. 
The  amount  spent  per  acre  for  hired  labor  was  highest  on  the 
largest  farms.  This  is  to  be  expected  for  the  operators  of  small 
farms  do  not  have  enough  work  to  employ  hired  help. 


Tabic  47- — Specified  Farm  Expenditures  on  Cash-Grain  Farms 
in  Subregion  89,  by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Economic  class  of  farm 

Item 

Total 

I 

11 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Average  per  farm: 

Cropland 

..acres.. 

378 

1,324 

614 

376 

247 

171 

105 

Machine  hire 

dollars 

198 

622 

287 

193 

144 

128 

86 

Gas  and  oil 

...do.— 

833 

2.  781 

1,302 

844 

575 

380 

236 

Hired  labor -   ... 

...do.  .. 

49a 

4.  608 

1.021 

337 

144 

82 

14 

Commercial  fertilizer 

...do... 

273 

1.  656 

537 

235 

122 

62 

34 

Feed  bought 

.do.... 
.do.-.. 

286 

2.  080 

698 

542 

281 

186 

104 

37 

Total 

10.  365 

3.  689 

1,890 

1,171 

756 

407 

Average  per  crop  acre: 

Machine  hire 

dollars- . 

0.52 

0.47 

0.47 

0.51 

0.58 

0.75 

0.82 

Gas  and  oil 

-do.  .. 

2.21 

2.10 

2.12 

2.24 

2.33 

2.22 

2.25 

Hired  labor- 

.-do.... 

1.30 

3.4S 

1.66 

.90 

.58 

.48 

.13 

Commercial  fertilizer 

...do.  . 
...do-.. 

.72 

1.25 

.87 

.62 

.50 

.36 

.32 

Total... 

4.75 

7.30 

5.  12 

4.27 

:;  vi 

3.81 

3.52 

Table    48. — Specified    Farm    Expenditures    on    Cash-Grain 
Farms  in  Subregion  90,  by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Item 

Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Average  per  farm: 

Machine  hire dollars.- 

Gas  and  oil do 

Hired  labor -do 

Commercial  fertilizer.,  .do 

Feed  bought - do 

168 
857 
322 

48 
172 

578 

2.702 

3.248 

593 

772 

259 
1,425 
872 
147 
314 

167 
963 
322 

47 
197 

150 
711 
174 
22 
135 

120 
473 

V, 
6 
79 

126 
342 

81 

5 

35 

Total do.- 

Average  per  crop  acre: 

Machine  hire dollars.. 

Gas  and  oil --do 

Hired  labor..- ..do 

Commercial  fertilizer.  ..do 

1,567 

0.  31 
1.60 
.60 
.09 

7,893 

0.29 

1.37 

1.64 

.30 

3,017 

0.27 
1.51 
.92 
.16 

1,696 

0.28 

1.60 

.53 

.08 

1,192 

0.36 
1.70 
.42 
.05 

764 

0.42 
1.67 
.30 

.02 

589 

0.57 
1.55 
.37 
.02 

Total do.-. 

2.60 

3.60 

2.86 

2.49 

2.53 

2.41 

2.51 

Table    49. — Specified    Farm    Expenditures    on    Cash-Grain 
Farms  in  Subregion  91,  by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Economic  class  of  farm 

Item 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Average  per  farm: 

Cropland 

.  .acres- - 

442 

1,646 

757 

469 

321 

218 

185 

Machine  hire 

dollars  . 

244 

971 

388 

250 

184 

158 

97 

1  las  :md  oil 

...do... 

812 

2,  558 

1.  337 

862 

640 

388 

306 

Hired  labor 

..do... 

293 

2,660 

735 

260 

113 

80 

66 

Commercial  fertilizer 

...do  . 

35 

289 

86 

33 

15 

4 

4 

Feed  bought 

do  ... 
..do    . 

299 

1.019 

497 

353 

198 

152 

50 

Total 

1.683 

7.497 

3.  043 

1,758 

1,150 

782 

523 

Average  per  crop  acre: 

Machine  hire 

dollars 

0.55 

0.59 

0.51 

0.53 

0.57 

0.72 

0.52 

Gas  and  oil 

..do... 

1.83 

1.55 

1.76 

1.83 

1.99 

1.78 

1.65 

Bired  labor 

..do... 

.66 

1.61 

.97 

.55 

.35 

.36 

.35 

Commercial  fertilizer 

...do... 

..do .... 

.07 

.17 

.  11 

.07 

.04 

.01 

.02 

Total 

3.11 

3.92 

3.35 

2.98 

2.95 

2.87 

2.54 

Table    50. — Specified    Farm    Expenditures    on    Cash-Grain 
Farms  in  Subregion  105,  by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Item 

Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

A  vci  age  per  farm: 

Machine  hire dollars.  . 

Gas  and  oil do 

Hin-d  labor do 

Commercial  fertilizer do 

Feed  bought— do 

386 

1,004 

579 

43 

142 

1,156 

2,129 

2,506 

181 

313 

472 

1,298 

862 

67 

195 

333 
974 
373 
27 
141 

213 
698 
156 
12 
86 

194 
459 

84 
4 

54 

144 
330 

48 
1 

28 

Total do.... 

A\  erage  per  crop  acre: 

Machine  hire do — 

Gas  and  oil ...do 

Hired  labor do 

Commercial  fertilizer. .  .do 

2,154 

0.50 
1.31 
.75 
.06 

6,285 

0.56 
1.02 
1.21 

.09 

2,894 

0.45 
1.23 
.82 

.(16 

1,848 

0.50 
1.46 
.56 

.04 

1,165 

0.48 
1.59 
.35 
.03 

795 

it  67 
1.58 
.29 
.01 

551 

0.71 
1.63 
.24 
(z) 

Total... do.... 

2.  62 

2.88 

2.56 

2.  66 

2.45 

2.55 

2.58 

z  Less  than  0.05  cent. 

Because  of  the  decline  in  the  importance  of  expenditures  for 
hired  labor,  the  total  cost  per  crop  acre  for  specified  expenses 
decreases  as  the  size  of  farm  decreases  in  subregions  89,  90,  and  91. 
However,  the  total  cost  per  crop  acre  does  not  decline  with  the 
change  in  size  of  farm  in  subregion  105  where  the  lower  hired  labor 
per  acre  on  the  smaller  farms  is  offset  by  higher  costs  for  gas  and  oil. 

The  use  of  commercial  fertilizer  is  not  common  except  in  the 
Red  River  Valley  where  about  half  the  farmers  reported  its  use 
(see  table  51).  In  the  other  areas,  less  than  15  percent  of  fanners 
reported  the  use  of  fertilizer.  The  percentage  of  farmers  in  the 
lower-income  groups  who  use  fertilizer  is  very  low.  Probably 
many  do  not  have  the  capital  to  buy  fertilizer  and  others  probably 
lack  information  on  which  to  make  a  decision  to  adopt  a  rela- 
tively new  practice.  The  higher  percentage  of  older  farmers  in 
these  groups  may  be  related  to  the  small  percentage  of  farmers 
reporting  the  use  of  fertilizer.  The  rate  of  application  reported 
is  rather  uniform  among  the  economic  classes  in  subregions  89 
and  90.  The  use  of  commercial  fertilizer  in  the  other  two  sub- 
regions  is  not  a  common  practice. 


24 


FARMERS  AND  FARM  PRODUCTION 


Table  51. — Use  of  Commercial  Fertilizer  on  Cash-Grain 
Farms  in  the  Hard  Spring  Wheat  Region,  by  Economic 
Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Percent  of  farms  using  fertilizer. . 

Tons  used  per  farm 

Rate  of  application,  pounds  per 
acre 


Percent  of  farms  using  fertilizer . . 

Tons  used  per  farm 

Rate  of  application,  pounds  per 
acre 


Percent  of  farms  using  fertilizer. . 

Tons  used  per  farm 

Rate  of  application,  pounds  per 
acre 


Percent  of  farms  using  fertilizer . . 

Tons  used  per  farm 

Rate  of  application,  pounds  per 
acre 


Economic  class  of  farm 


Total         I 


III         IV 


VI 


Subregion  89 


52 

85 

70 

56 

45 

33 

21 

3.3 

19.2 

6.4 

2.8 

1.5 

0.8 

.4 

71 

74 

70 

69 

74 

79 

88 

Subregion  90 

14 

54 

31 

16 

9 

4 

0.5 

6.7 

1.6 

0.5 

0.2 

0.1 

45 

44 

45 

46 

44 

44 

3 
0.1 


Subregion  91 


11 

29 

22 

13 

8 

(z) 

.4 

3.4 

1.0 

.4 

_  9 

(z) 

80 

112 

81 

77 

72 

53 

6 
0.1 


Subregion  105 


11 

27 

18 

11 

5 

3 

(z> 

0.5 

2.0 

0.8 

0.3 

0.1 

0.1 

(z) 

40 

36 

37 

50 

54 

66 

22 

z  Less  thanO. 5 percent  or  less  than  0.05 ton. 

Efficiency  Levels  of  Farm  Operation 

Gross  sales  minus  the  specified  expenses  per  farm  varied  greatly 
from  an  average  of  $4,570  to  $8,989  among  four  subregions.  (See 
tables  52  to  55.)  This  measure  does  not  represent  net  income 
because  only  some  of  the  operating  expenses  have  been  considered. 
Other  large  items  of  cost  to  be  considered  in  arriving  at  a  net 
income  include  taxes,  repairs  and  depreciation  on  buildings  and 
machinery,  supplies,  and  livestock  purchases.  Additional  costs  of 
production  would  include  also  the  value  of  the  operator's  and  un- 
paid family  labor  and  interest  on  the  investment.  Also  these 
data  indicate  returns  for  only  1  year  and  therefore  may  reflect 
abnormal  differences  in  weather  conditions  in  1954.  Although 
the  importance  ot  specific  expense  items  varies  somewhat  from 
one  part  of  this  area  to  another,  these  data  do  provide  useful 
measures  for  comparing  economic  classes  of  farms  and  subregions. 

Table  52. — Selected  Measures  of  Income  and  Efficiency 
Levels  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  89,  by  Economic 
Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Item 


Gross  sales  per  farm dollars. . 

Specified    expenses     per    farm 

do.... 

Gross  sales  less  specified  expenses 

per  farm do 

Gross  sales  per  man-equivalent 

do... 

Total  investment  per  $100  gross 

sales do 

Total  investment  per  man- 
equivalent  do 

Machinery  investment  per  man- 
equivalent do 

Machinery  investment  per  crop 
acre do... 

Wheat  yield  per  acre. . .  bushels. 

Crop  acres  per  man-equivalent. 


Economic  class  of  farm 
I  II         III         IV  V  VI 


7,759 
2,080 
5,679 
5,581 

579 

31,  859 

8,450 

31 

15 

272 


36,  897 
10,  365 
26,  532 
10,  350 
394 

40,236 

8,445 

23 

17 

371 


14,610 
3,689 

10,  927 

8,508 

491 

42, 186 
9,735 


16 
357 


7,400 
1,889 
5,511 
5,430 


31,600 

8,647 

31 

14 

276 


3.929 
1,171 
2,758 
3,245 
779 

25,  330 

7,745 

38 

13 

204 


2, 037 
756 
1,281 
2.017 
1,042 

20,840 
,297 

41 

10 
170 


852 

407 

445 

932 

1,527 

13,  570 

6,018 

47 

8 

115 


Table  53. — Selected  Measures  of  Income  and  Efficiency 
Levels  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  90,  by  Economic 
Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Item 

Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Gross  sales  per  farm dollars . . 

Specified  expenses  per  farm 

dollars.. 
Gross   sales    less   specified   ex- 
penses per  farm dollars.. 

Gross  sales  per  man-equivalent 

dollars. . 

Total  investment  per  $100  gross 

sales ..dollars. . 

Total  investment  per  man- 
equivalent dollars. . 

Machinery  investment  per  man- 
equivalent dollars.. 

Machinery  investment  per  crop 
acre dollars. . 

Wheat  yield  per  acre... bushels. . 

Crop  acres  per  man-equivalent. . 

6,138 
1,568 
4,570 
4,493 
530 

27,  461 
8,538 

8 
392 

34,  976 

7,893 

27,083 

11.478 

360 

42,046 

9,653 

15 

13 

648 

13,813 
3,017 

10,796 

7,561 

401 

36,861 

8,891 

17 

10 

517 

7,104 

1,697 

5,407 

4,898 

607 

28,  731 
8,933 

21 

S 
416 

3,908 
1,193 

2,715 

3,129 

797 

25,888 

8,351 

25 

7 

336 

2,081 

764 
1,317 
2,006 
1,017 

21,350 

7,539 

28 

6 

274 

989 

589 

400 

1,001 

1,727 

17,  274 

6,441 

29 

4 

223 

Table  54. — Selected  Measures  of  Income  and  Efficiency 
Levels  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  91,  by  Economic 
Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Item 


Gross  sales  per  farm dollars.. 

Specified  expenses  per  farm 

dollars.. 
Gross   sales   less   specified   ex- 
penses per  farm dollars. . 

Gross  sales  per  man-equivalent 
dollars.. 
Total  investment  per  $100  gross 
sales.. dollars.. 

Total  Investment  per  man- 
equivalent  dollars. . 

Machinery  Investment  per  man- 
equivalent dollars.. 

Machinery  investment  per  crop 
acre dollars.. 

Wheat  yield  per  acre,  .bushels.. 

Crop  acres  per  man-equivalent.. 


Economic  class  of  farm 


Total 


6,838 
1,683 
5,155 
5,225 
583 

30,  492 

8,110 

24 

10 

333 


34,966 
7.498 
27,468 
13,609 
349 

46,833 

9,464 

15 

12 

640 


II  III         IV 


14,251 
3,044 

11,207 

8,823 

468 

41,  543 

9,  541 

20 

11 

469 


7,297 
1,758 
5,539 
5,364 

587 

30, 185 

8,233 

24 

10 

345 


3,953 
1,151 
2,802 
3,261 
764 

24, 834 

6,707 

29 

8 

265 


2,058 

783 

1,275 

2,015 

951 

19, 021 

6,219 

29 

7 

213 


VI 

954 
523 
441 


14,  077 

4,612 

24 

5 

190 


Table  55. — Selected  Measures  of  Income  and  Efficiency 
Levels  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  105,  by  Economic 
Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Item 


Gross  sales  per  farm dollars- 
Specified  expenses  per  farm 

dollars.. 
Gross    sales   less    specified   ex- 
penses per  farm dollars. . 

Gross  sales  per  man-equivalent 
dollars.  . 
Total  investment  per  $100  gross 
sales dollars.. 

Total     investment    per     man- 
equivalent  dollars . . 

Machinery  investment  per  man- 
equivalent  dollars. . 

Machinery  investment  per  crop 
acre dollars.. 

Wheat  yield  per  acre: 

Winter bushels.. 

Spring bushels.. 

Crop  acres  per  man-equivalent.. 


Economic  class  of  farm 


Total        I 


11.142 
2,153 


552 

47, 172 

9,356 

16 

27 

12 

589 


587 
285 
302 
632 
385 

377 

572 

11 

29 

18 

936 


II  III         IV 


16,549 
2,895 
13, 654 
11,212 

518 

56,  986 

10,  247 

14 

25 

14 

714 


7,  658 
1.848 
5,810 
6,025 
667 

39,  519 

9,060 

17 


10 
526 


3,958 
1,164 
2,  794 
3,608 

860 

31,276 

639 

22 

20 

9 

401 


2,023 
795 
1,228 
2,192 
1,129 

25,094 

7,671 

24 

12 

7 

315 


VI 


549 

340 

1,053 

1,982 

22,302 

6,676 

28 

5 

6 

240 


Some  of  the  more  meaningful  measures  of  levels  of  efficiency  are 
not  affected  significantly  by  growing  conditions  in  a  single  year. 
These  include  total  investment  per  man,  machinery  investment 
per  man,  machinery  investment  per  crop  acre,  and  crop  acres 
per  num. 


WHEAT  PRODUCERS  AND  WHEAT  PRODUCTION 


25 


Farms  in  subregion  105  had  the  highest  total  investment  per 
man,  the  highest  investment  in  machinery  per  man,  the  largest 
number  of  crop  acres  per  man.  but  the  lowest  investment  in 
machinery  per  crop  acre.  These  measures  of  level  of  efficiency 
do  not  vary  greatly  among  the  other  three  subregions,  although 
for  farms  in  subregion  89  the  investment  per  man  and  crop  acres 
per  man  are  somewhat  lower  than  for  farms  in  the  other  two 
subregions. 

Comparisons  of  measures  of  level  of  efficiency  by  economic  class 
indicate  a  decrease  in  total  investment  and  crop  acres  per  man  from 
Class  I  to  Class  VI  farms,  whereas,  machinery  investment  per  acre 
Increased  from  the  large  to  small  farms.  There  was  some  decline 
in  investment  in  machinery  per  man  from  Class  I  to  Class  VI 
farms  but  the  decline  was  not  nearly  as  sharp  as  that  for  total 
investment  per  farm  or  crop  acres  per  man.  This  explains  perhaps 
one  of  the  more  significant  reasons  for  low  net  income  (gross  sales 
less  specified  expenditures)  on  these  farms  as  a  minimum  amount 
of  machinery  is  required  even  for  a  small  acreage.  A  second 
significant  reason  for  low  incomes  on  the  Class  VI  farms  is  the 
low  yields  per  acre  in  1954.  In  all  four  subregions,  the  farms 
with  larger  gross  income  had  significantly  higher  yields  per  acre. 

OTHER   TYPES  OF   FARMING   IN   THE   HARD   RED 
SPRING  WHEAT  REGION 

Other  types  of  farming  in  the  hard  spring  wheat  region  are  of 
interest.  In  the  Red  River  Valley  (subregion  89),  there  were 
3,001  dairy  farms  and  3,21.3  general  farms.  On  these  farms,  feed 
crops  were  emphasized  more  than  wheat  and  more  livestock  were 
kept  than  on  cash-grain  farms. 

In  subregions  90  and  91,  there  were  8,942  general  farms.  These 
were  similar  to  the  cash-grain  farms  in  the  same  area.  Wheat 
was  the  major  crop  on  tilled  land  but  the  general  farms  had  more 
pastureland  and  livestock  than  the  cash-grain  farms.  No  doubt 
some  of  these  general  farms  would  have  been  classified  as  cash- 
grain  farms  if  wheat  yields  had  been  normal. 

In  subregion  105  in  southwestern  North  Dakota  and  Montana 
there  is  much  land  not  suitable  for  cultivation.  Farmers  who 
have  a  large  acreage  of  grassland  keep  more  cattle  or  sheep  than 
wheat  farmers.  In  this  subregion  there  were  6,336  livestock 
farms.  Among  these  are  many  that  are  very  similar  to  wheat 
farms  but  with  enough  income  from  livestock  in  1954  to  be  classi- 
fied as  livestock  farms.  Among  the  farm  units  classified  as 
livestock  are  many  ranches  that  have  the  same  characteristics  as 
those  in  the  nearby  range  livestock  areas.  These  units  usually 
are  characterized  by  large  acreages  in  grass  and  little  cropland. 

Although  flax  was  once  grown  more  widely,  it  is  now  produced 
mainly  in  three  States — North  Dakota,  South  Dakota,  and 
Minnesota.  In  1954,  nearly  80,000  farmers  reported  a  total  of 
5  million  acres  with  a  production  of  34  million  bushels  of  flax 
in  these  three  States  (see  table  56) .  North  Dakota  is  by  far  the 
leading  flax-producing  State.  Acreage  allotments  for  wheat  un- 
doubtedly influenced  the  acreage  of  flax.  As  grain  sorghum  pro- 
vides a  cash-grain  alternative  to  winter  wheat  in  the  southern 
part  of  the  Great  Plains,  so  flax  offers  alternative  opportunities  in 
the  northern  Great  Plains  and  Minnesota. 

Flax  production  is  closely  associated  with  wheat  production, 
for  many  farmers  grow  both  crops.  Most  flax  is  grown  by 
farmers  who  raise  only  small  quantities.  In  1954,  92  percent  of 
the  producers  harvested  less  than  1,000  bushels  each;  20  percent 
harvested  less  than  100  bushels  each. 


Table  56. — Acreage  and  Production  of  Flax  in  the  Three 
Leading  Producing  States:  1954 

[Data  arc  estimates  based  on  reports  for  only  a  sample  of  farmsl 


Item 

North            South 
Dakota     1     Dakota 

Minnesota 

61,808 

42.171 

3,  126,  185 

8.  117 
11.  166 
12.437 
in,  451 

21),  032,  677 

7,239 
21,  155 
8,724 
5,053 

62, 350 

16.238 

944.  306 

4,444 
4.828 
4.  501 
2.  465 

5,  167,  435 

3,163 

9.  795 

2,443 

837 

165,  324 

29,  491 

978,315 

Number  of  farms  reporting  by  acres  harvested: 

15,368 

8,410 
4,  362 
1,351 

.V 1-99  awes _ 

Production —bushels.  - 

Farms  report  Ing  by  number  of  bushels  harveste  1: 

8,  228,  230 
7  317 

100-499  bushels          

500-999  bushels     . 

17.922 
3,  362 

890 

THE  WHITE  WHEAT  REGION  (SUBREGION  110) 

This  area,  located  in  northwestern  United  States  (see  fig.  9), 
has  long  been  known  for  its  specialized,  large-scale  farming. 
Even  before  modern  tractor  power  was  available,  it  was  known 
for  its  large  farms  and  big  machines  pulled  by  large  teams  of 
horses.  It  has  continued  to  have  large  farms  and  a  labor-extensive 
type  of  farming.  Although  some  hard  winter  wheat  and  some 
hard  spring  wheat  are  grown  in  the  western,  more  arid  part  of 
subregion  110,  the  soft  white  wheat  predominates.  Small  quan- 
tities of  white  wheat  are  also  grown  in  Michigan  and  New  York. 

THE   WHITE  WHEAT  AREA 
SUBREGION  110 


Figure  9. 


26 


FARMERS  AND  FARM  PRODUCTION 


The  soils  here  include  several  types — the  Northern  Chernozem, 
Northern  Dark  Brown,  and  Northern  Gray  Desert.  These  are 
deep  silt  loams  developed  from  loessal  material;  they  have  good 
moisture-retaining  properties  and  are  fertile  and  well  suited  to 
wheat.  The  topography  varies  from  nearly  level  valley  to  hilly 
land.  In  much  of  subregion  110,  rolling  to  hilly  land  predomi- 
nates. Many  of  the  slopes  are  so  steep  that  special  machines 
have  been  designed  to  harvest  the  wheat.  One  is  the  self-leveling 
grain  combine.  Crawler-type  tractors  are  commonly  used  for 
field  work. 

The  variation  in  precipitation  influences  the  intensity  of  farm- 
ing. The  rainfall  varies  from  25  inches  annually  to  less  than  10 
inches.  In  the  eastern  part  where  the  rainfall  varies  from  18  to 
25  inches,  the  land  is  cropped  each  year  and  wheat  is  commonly 
grown  in  rotation  with  peas  or  with  other  small  grains.  The  line 
of  18-inch  rainfall  is  the  approximate  boundary  of  annual  cropping. 
To  the  west,  in  the  Big  Bend  part  of  Washington  and  the  wheat 
areas  of  northern  Oregon,  where  the  annual  rainfall  is  10  to  18 
inches,  wheat  alternates  with  summer  fallow.  Summer-fallowing 
is  necessary  to  accumulate  the  moisture  necessary  for  a  wheat  crop. 
Some  fallowing  is  done  in  the  area  of  higher  rainfall  (18  to  25 
inches)  but  here  the  reason  for  fallowing  is  to  control  weeds  or  to 
turn  under  heavy  stubble  and  give  it  time  to  decompose.  The 
driest  season  occurs  during  the  summer,  and  provides  for  ideal 
harvesting.  Transportation  and  marketing  facilities  are  ade- 
quate; both  railroads  and  highways  offer  ample  opportunity  for 
transporting  the  wheat  to  market. 

The  white  wheat  region  ranks  below  the  hard  winter  and  hard 
spring  wheat  regions  in  total  wheat  production  as  it  is  the  smallest 
of  the  three.  In  1954,  it  produced  87  million  bushels  of  wheat, 
or  10  percent  of  all  wheat  in  the  United  States.  Nearly  all  of  the 
wheat  is  grown  on  commercial  cash-grain  farms.  Only  3  percent 
of  the  wheat  was  grown  on  other  than  commercial  cash-grain 
farms  in  1954. 

Size  of  Business 

This  region  is  characterized  by  a  highly  mechanized  system  of 
farming.  Subregion  110  exceeds  any  other  wheat  area  in  crop 
acres  per  farm,  gross  income  per  farm,  total  investment,  and 
investment  in  machinery.  Yields  in  1954  were  approximately 
20  percent  above  the  5-year  average.  This  affected  the  gross 
income  and  the  classification  of  farms  by  economic  class  in  1954, 
but  should  not  affect  appreciably  the  relationships  between 
economic  classes  in  the  acreage  per  farm  or  the  investment  in 
machinery  and  land  and  buildings. 

In  1954,  more  than  70  percent  of  all  cash-grain  farms  fell  into 
Economic  Classes  I  and  II  while  less  than  2  percent  were  in  Class 
VI.  The  range  in  size  of  farms  is  exceptionally  large;  Class  I 
farms  are  20  times  as  large  in  total  acres  as  Class  VI  farms.  Only 
the  Class  I  and  Class  II  groups  average  more  than  one  man-equiv- 
alent per  farm.  Measures  of  size  of  farm  by  economic  class  are 
shown  in  table  57. 

Table  57. — Size  of  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  110,  by 
Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Economic  class  of  farm 

1 
Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

9,109 

1,188 

793 

113.  412 
3.005 
18.  244 

3.346 
2.103 
1,462 

201,  798 
4.767 
25,  949 

3.303 
874 
566 

83,613 
2,476 
16,213 

1,233 
454 
243 

40,  576 
1,626 
11,994 

775 
325 
154 

27, 436 
1,173 
9,763 

325 
213 
100 

18,  593 

793 

8,176 

127 

110 

41 

Capital  investment  per  farm: 
Land  and  buildings,   dollars. . 

Livestock .-do 

Machinery do 

11,  747 

569 

6,306 

Total 

134,  661 

1.6 

232, 514 
2.4 

102, 304 
1.4 

54,  196 
1.  1 

38,372 
1.0 

27,  562 
0.7 

18,  622 

Man-equivalent  per  farm. 

0.7 

Crop  and  Livestock  Organization 

Wheat,  and  summer  fallow  together  use  nearly  three-fourths  of 
the  cropland  in  this  area  (see  table  58).  As  indicated  earlier  there 
are  important  differences  in  the  use  of  cropland  within  the  area 
associated  with  the  amount  of  precipitation.  The  farms  in  the 
eastern  part  of  Washington  and  western  Idaho  receive  more  rain- 
fall and  are  more  diversified.  The  production  of  dry  field  peas 
is  an  important  enterprise  on  many  of  these  farms.  Other  farmers 
rotate  wheat  with  feed  grains  and  green  manure  crops.  In  the 
remainder  of  the  subregion,  the  cropping  system  is  mainly  wheat 
and  summer  fallow  with  varying  acreages  of  oats  or  barley.  In 
the  more  arid  parts  a  straight  wheat-summer  fallow  rotation  is 
followed. 


Table  58. — Land  Use  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion 
110,  by  Economic  Class  of  Farm;  1954 


Percent 

Economic  class  of  farm 

report- 
ing 

Total 

1 

11 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

9,109 

1,188 
793 

253 

31 

87 

18 

328 

368 

3,346 

2,103 
1,462 

496 
43 

163 
34 

616 

615 

3,303 

874 
566 

166 
31 
61 
12 
235 
286 

1,233 

454 
243 

57 
18 
27 
8 
84 
175 

775 

325 

154 

30 
12 
16 
3 
47 
136 

325 

213 
100 

12 
10 
9 
2 
17 
71 

127 

Acres  per  farm: 
All  land.. 

100 
100 

87 
30 
77 
16 
84 
71 

110 

41 

Wheat: 

9 

3 

3 

1 

9 

53 

For  subregion  110  as  a  whole,  other  crops  occupy  a  little  over 
one-fourth  of  the  land.  Barley  is  more  important  than  oats. 
The  acreage  of  pastureland  varies  from  farm  to  farm,  and  con- 
sists largely  of  land  not  suited  for  cultivation.  The  smaller  farms 
have  relatively  less  wheat  and  fallow  and  they  are  located  mostly 
in  the  diversified  area. 

The  livestock  system  here  is  typical  of  the  western  wheat  areas. 
Many  of  the  large  wheat-fallow  farms  with  little  pasture  have  no 
livestock.  Some  farmers  keep  a  small  flock  of  chickens,  and 
enough  cattle  to  utilize  the  pasture  and  roughage.  Hogs  are 
found  on  approximately  26  percent  of  the  farms.  Sheep  are  kept 
on  a  relatively  few  farms  and  the  average  size  of  flock  for  farms 
keeping  sheep  is  much  larger  than  indicated  by  data  in  table  59. 
The  low-income  farmers,  as  a  group,  have  very  few  livestock,  but 
this  group  is  relatively  much  smaller  in  number  in  the  white 
wheat  region  than  in  the  other  wheat  regions.  Many  of  the  op- 
erators of  the  low  income  farms  have  other  occupations  or  other 
sources  of  income. 

Table  59. — Livestock  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion 
110,  by  Economic  Class  of  Farm;  1954 


Percent 
of  farms 
report- 
ing 

Economic  class  of  farm 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

9,109 

28 
1 
4 
4 

39 

1,449 
3,005 

3,346 

46 
1 

5 

7 

37 

2,344 
4,767 

3,303 

23 
1 
5 
2 

42 

1,196 
2.476 

1,233 

15 
1 
3 
3 

48 

794 
1,626 

775 

10 
2 
3 
2 

33 

447 

1,173 

325 

7 
1 
1 

127 

Livestock,  number  per  farm: 
All  cattle 

72 
52 
26 
6 
64 

XXX 
X  X  X 

5 

1 

2 

27 

209 
793 

19 

Gross  sales  of  livestock  and 
livestock     products    per 
farm. dollars. . 

Investment  in  livestock  per 
farm dollars. . 

98 
569 

WHEAT  PRODUCERS  AND  WHEAT  PRODUCTION 


27 


Labor  Used 

For  subregion  110  as  a  whole,  the  farm  operators  and  their 
families  comprise  approximately  GO  percent,  and  hired  workers, 
40  percent  of  the  total  labor  force.  Unpaid  family  labor  is  less 
important  in  this  subregion  than  in  the  other  major  wheat  regions. 
(See  table  60.) 

Table  60. — Labor  Force  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion 
110,  by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Economic  class  ot  farm 

Item 

Tula! 

1 

11 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

T"t:il  nuin-eiiuivalent- 

1.7 

.9 
.2 

.6 

100.0 

2.4 

1.3 

1. 1 

0.9 

0.7 

ii  6 

Operator... 

Unpaid  family  help... 
Hired    

.9 
.2 
1.3 

100.  0 

.9 
.1 
.3 

100.0 

.8 
.2 
.1 

100.0 

.  7 
2 

100.0 

.5 
.2 

C) 

100.0 

.6 
C) 
(■) 

Operators  by 
All  operators   percent. 

100.0 

Under  25  years.-do. 
25-34  years          .do 

3.5-64  years    do.. 

66  years  and  over  do. 

1.0 

17.(1 
71.0 
11.0 

1.0 
19.0 
74.0 

6.0 

1.0 
18.0 

7:;.n 

S   II 

1.0 
15.0 

69  o 
15.0 

1   0 

70.  0 
20.0 

3.0 

1.'  il 
61.0 

24  0 

"  4.0 

37.  0 
59.0 

■     Less  than  "  05. 

The  Class  I  farms  average  1,462  crop  acres  per  farm,  and  have 
a  man-equivalent  of  2.4  per  farm.  Actually  several  hired  men 
are  used  during  the  period  when  field  operations  are  performed. 
Many  operators  of  farms  in  other  economic  classes  have  part- 
time  work  off  the  farms;  one-third  of  the  operators  work  more 
than  100  days  off  the  farm  and  another  15  percent  work  1  to  09 
days  off  the  farm.  Approximately  half  of  the  farmers  on  the 
smaller  farms  perform  off-farm  work. 

A  very  small  percentage  of  the  farm  operators  are  under  25 
years  of  age.  Compared  with  the  other  wheat  regions,  the  per- 
centage of  operators  under  25  years  old  is  small  and  the  percentage 
in  the  25-to-34-year  group  is  relatively  large.  The  percentage  of 
operators  05  years  of  age  for  Class  VI  farms  is  the  largest  for  any 
region.  Many  of  the  operators  of  these  small  farms  may  be  semi- 
retired. 

Farm  Mechanization  and  Home  Conveniences 

Farms  here  are  highly  mechanized.  Nearly  all  have  automo- 
biles, motortrucks,  and  tractors.  Most  farmers  have  only  one 
combine,  yet  relatively  little  is  spent  for  machine  hire.  Many 
operators  of  small  farms  hire  their  combining  performed.  (See 
table  61.) 

Table  61. — Farm  Mechanization  and  Home  Conveniences 
on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  110,  by  Economic  Class 
of  Farm:  1954 


Economic  class  of  farm 

Item 

Total 

1 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Number  of  farms 

Number  per  farm: 

9.  109 

1.4 
2.2 
2.0 

1.  1 

93 
94 
96 
82 
4 
82 
96 
45 
92 
64 

3,346 

1.8 
3.3 
2.7 
1.5 

98 
99 
99 
96 
5 
91 
98 
54 
97 
80 

3,303 

1.2 
1.9 
1.9 
1.0 

95 
96 
97 
84 
4 
85 
96 
46 
94 
66 

1,233 

1.0 
1.3 
1.6 

.  7 

S8 
91 
95 
67 
1 
74 
95 
36 
86 
46 

775 

1.0 
1.1 
1.2 
.6 

81 
88 
89 
62 
2 
64 
93 
22 
83 
38 

325 

1.0 
1.0 
1.2 
.4 

86 
72 
89 
42 

59 
86 
24 
75 
26 

127 
0  7 

1  0 

Percent  of  farms  reporting: 

72 

Tractors 

69 

Field  forage  haryesters. 

4 

Piped  water  in  home. . 

75 

Modern  home  facilities  are  more  prevalent  in  the  white  wheal 
subregion  than  in  the  other  wheat  subregion.  This  may  be  re- 
lated to  the  small  percentage  of  farmers  in  the  low-income  groups; 
however,  this  area  had  power  lines  in  rural  areas  at  an  earlier  date 
than  most  other  wheat  regions  and  this  fact  has  probably  in- 
fluenced the  proportion  of  farms  with  electricity.  The  Class  VI 
farms  rank  much  higher  in  percentage  of  farmers  reporting  modern 
home  facilities  than  Class  VI  farms  in  other  wheat  regions. 

Gross  Farm  Income 

The  average  gross  income  for  all  cash-grain  farms  in  the  white 
wheal  legion  was  the  highest  for  any  wheat  subregion,  in  1954. 
This  would  probably  be  true  for  most  years,  for  the  farms  are  large 
and  the  yields  are  relatively  high.  Livestock  is  a  very  minor 
source  of  income.  More  than  half  of  the  income  is  derived  from 
wheat  even  on  farms  Inning  the  lowest  gross  income  (see  table  62). 

Table  62. — Sources  of  Farm  Income  on  Cash-Grain  Farms 
in  Subregion  110,  by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Economic  class  of  farm 

Item 

Total 

I 

11 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Number  of  farms 

Sales  per  farm: 

Wheat .dollars 

Other  crops do 

9,109 

19, 161 
5.433 

3,  346 

37, 986 
10,  174 

3.  303 

12. 176 
3,575 

1,233 

4,264 
1,979 

775 

2,028 
1,250 

325 

1,038 
604 

127 

411 
274 

All  crops. do 

Livestock  and 
livestock 
products do 

24.594 
1,449 

48, 160 
2,344 

15,751 
1.196 

6,243 

795 

3,278 
447 

1,642 
209 

685 

98 

Gross  sales. -do 

Percentage  of  gross  sales 

26.  ill:: 

74 
32.92 

50,  504 

75 
34.  58 

16,  947 

72 
30.02 

7,  038 

61 
29.  10 

3,725 

54 
24.33 

1,851 

56 
18.54 

783 

52 

Gross    sales    per    crop 
acre dollars.. 

20.97 

Farm  Expenses 

Specified  farm  expenditures  merely  indicate  the  level  of  some 
cost  items;  total  cost  of  operation  would  be  much  higher.  The  total 
cost  of  operation  for  these  large  farms  is  high,  but  the  cost  per  acre 
compares  favorably  with  that  of  most  other  areas.  Machine  hire, 
and  gas  and  oil  costs  per  acre,  go  up  as  the  size  of  farm  decreases, 
but  hired  labor  costs  per  acre  decline  with  the  decrease  in  acreage. 
Total  costs  per  acre  for  the  specified  expenses  are  approximately 
the  same  for  all  economic  classes  of  farms  except  Class  VI  (see 
table  63). 


Table  63. — Specified  Farm  Expenditures  on  Cash-Grain  Farms 
in  Subregion  110,  by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Economic  class  of  farm 

Item 

Total 

I 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Average  per  farm: 

Machine  hire. ..dollars 

369 

451 

393 

280 

171 

INS 

132 

Gas  and  oil do 

1,199 

2,039 

906 

549 

398 

285 

16,9 

Hired  labor do 

1,638 

3,480 

862 

206 

190 

62 

66 

Commercial 

fertilizer do 

953 

1,878 

545 

311 

221 

87 

72 

Feed  bought...  do 

455 

687 

393 

275 

170 

1S1 

113 

Total do... 

4,614 

8,535 

3,099 

1,621 

1,150 

803 

5S2 

Average  per  crop  acre: 

Machine  hire,  dollars 

0.47 

0.31 

0.69 

1.  15 

1.  11 

1.87 

3  22 

Gas  and  oil do 

1.51 

1.39 

1.60 

2.26 

2.59 

2.83 

4.  12 

Hired  labor do 

2.07 

2.38 

1.52 

.85 

1.24 

.62 

1.61 

Commercial 

fertilizer do 

1.20 

1.28 

.96 

1.28 

1.43 

.87 

1.77 

Total do.... 

5.25 

5.36 

4.77 

5.54 

6.37 

6.19 

in  72 

28 


FARMERS  AND  FARM  PRODUCTION 


Gas  and  oil  expenditures  per  acre  increase  with  the  deciease  in 
size  of  farm.  In  other  areas,  gas  and  oil  costs  per  acre  do  not  vary 
with  size  of  farm.  Many  of  the  operators  of  large  farms  have  un- 
doubtedly invested  in  tractors  that  burn  low-cost  fuel,  thus  reduc- 
ing the  fuel  cost  per  acre.  Machine  hire  costs  per  acre  also  are 
lower  on  the  large  farms  than  small  farms.  This  is  the  opposite 
of  this  relationship  for  large  and  small  farms  in  other  areas.  For 
example,  in  subregions  103  and  105,  for  Class  I  farms,  expenditures 
per  acre  for  hired  labor  were  higher  on  large  than  on  the  small  farms. 

Commercial  fertilizer  is  used  more  extensively  here  than  in  most 
other  wheat  subregions  (see  table  64).  Its  use  was  reported  on 
more  than  74  percent  of  the  Class  I  farms  in  1954.  Of  the  impor- 
tant wheat-producing  regions,  only  the  Red  River  Valley  ap- 
proaches the  white  wheat  region  in  percentage  of  farmers  reporting 
the  use  of  fertilizer. 

Table  64. — Use  of  Commercial  Fertilizer  on  Cash-Grain 
Farms  in  Subregion  110,  by  Economic  Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Economic  class  of  farm 

Item 

Total 

1 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Percent  of  farms  using 

fertilizer . 

Tons  used  per  farm 

Rate      of     application, 
pounds  per  acre 

64.0 
8.3 

96 

74.0 
15.9 

89 

61.0 

4.9 

104 

59.0 
3.  S 

152 

54.  0 
2.3 

146 

45.0 
1.3 

204 

28.0 
1.1 

326 

Efficiency  Levels  of  Farm  Operation 

For  the  year  1954,  the  cash-grain  farmers  of  the  white  wheat 
region  ranked  high  among  cash-grain  farmers  in  all  wheat  sub- 
regions  in  levels  of  efficiency.  Gross  sales  per  worker  of  $10,000 
were  very  high  and  the  investment  per  $100  gross  sales  was  low 
(see  table  65).  The  number  of  crop  acres  per  man  and  the  invest- 
ment in  machinery  per  man-equivalent  was  very  high.  One  man 
can  operate  many  acres  with  the  large  machinery  used  in  the  sub- 
region.  In  1954,  wheat  yields  were  20  percent  above  average. 
A  high  level  of  production  accompanied  by  high  prices  accounts  in 
part  for  the  high  gross  returns  per  farm  and  per  worker.  For 
each  measure  of  level  of  efficiency,  there  was  a  decline  from  Class 
I  through  Class  VI  farms 

Tabic  65. — Selected  Measures  of  Income  and  Efficiency 
Levels  on  Cash-Grain  Farms  in  Subregion  110,  by  Economic 
Class  of  Farm:  1954 


Economic  class  of  farm 

Item 

Total 

1 

II 

III 

IV 

V 

VI 

Gross    sales    per    farm 

dollars.. 

26,  OSS 

50,558 

16,  994 

7,  071 

3,742 

1,862 

858 

Specified    expenses   per 

farm dollars. . 

4,613 

8,  537 

3,098 

1,620 

1.  150 

803 

581 

Gross  sales  less  specified 

expenses     per     farm 

dollars.. 

21,  475 

42,021 

13,  896 

5.  451 

2,592 

1,  059 

270 

Gross    sales    per   man- 

equivalent dollars. . 

16,105 

21,408 

12,518 

6,702 

3,941 

2,512 

1,210 

Total    investment     per 

$100  gross  sales 

dollars 

517 

460 

605 

774 

1.037 

1,531 

2,327 

Total    investment    per 

man-equivalent 

dollars.. 

84,163 

96,  881 

73, 074 

49,  209 

38,  372 

39, 374 

26,  603 

Machlnerv    investment 

per  man-equivalent 

dollars 

11,263 

10,  988 

11,943 

11,367 

10,  2S0 

11,026 

8,899 

Machinery   investment 

per  crop  acre,  .dollars  . . 

23 

18 

29 

49 

63 

82 

154 

W  inter  wheat  yield  pei- 

acre bushels 

33 

34 

31 

29 

25 

28 

17 

Crop    acres    per    man- 

4S9 

619 

417 

230 

162 

135 

RECENT    CHANGES   BY    MAJOR    WHEAT    REGIONS 

Some  comparisons  between  1954  and  1949  for  hard  winter, 
hard  spring,  and  white  wheat  regions  are  given  in  tables  66  to  68. 
These  are  not  comparisons  of  an  identical  group  of  farms  in  the 
two  periods  as  the  data  for  each  year  are  for  those  farms  classified 
as  cash-grain  farms  in  that  particular  year.  The  same  farms  may 
not  have  been  classified  as  cash-grain  in  both  years. 

From  1949  to  1954,  the  size  of  farm  increased,  the  acres  in 
pasture  increased,  but  the  acreage  in  wheat  decreased.  The 
magnitude  of  these  changes  varied  between  subregions  and  be- 
tween major  wheat  regions.  The  most  drastic  reduction  in  wheat 
acreage  occurred  in  subregion  89,  where  the  1954  acreage  was  only 
one-third  that  of  1949.  In  several  subregions  the  decrease  in 
wheat  acreage  was  as  much  as  25  percent. 

Table  66. — A  Comparison  of  Some  Items  for  Organization, 
Expenses,  and  Home  Facilities  for  Cash-Grain  Farms  in 
the  Hard  Winter  Wheat  Region:  1954  and  1949 


Item 


Total  farms 

Acres  per  farm: 

All  land 

C  ropland. .  - 

Wheat -. -.-. 

Land  pastured 

Livestock-  number  per  farm: 

All  cattle. 

Milk  cows 

Hogs 

Chickens 

Expenditures  per  farm  (dollars) 

Machine  hire-.. __. 

Hired  labor 

Gas  and  oil.. _ 

Total — 

Facilities—percent   of   farms   r 
porting: 

Telephone. 

Electricity.. 

Home  freezer 


Subregion  93 


1949  1954 


337 
250 
84 


90 


197 
181 
454 


19,  859 


358 

25S 

71 

92 


26 

3 

10 

113 


223 
161 
575 


Subregion  94 


1949  1954 


18.  002 


349 
263 
205 


343 
298 
493 


362 
264 
145 
95 


263 
241 
525 


Subregion  103 


1949  1954 


34,  453 


812 
593 
340 
216 


655 
716 
813 


820 
607 
223 
212 


3 
60 


473 
504 
913 


64 
89 
42 


Table  67- — A  Comparison  of  Some  Items  for  Organization, 
Expenses,  and  Home  Facilities  for  Cash-Grain  Farms  in 
the  Hard  Spring  Wheat  Region:  1954  and  1949 


Item 


Total  farms 

Acres  per  farm: 
All  land... 
Cropland  

Wheat 

Land  pastured 

Livestock— number  per 
farm: 

All  cattle 

Milk  cows. 

Hogs . . . 

Chickens 

Expenditures  per  farm 
(dollars): 

Machine  hire 

Hired  labor 

Gas  and  oil 

Total 

Facilities  —  percent    of 
farms  reporting: 

Telephone 

Electricity 

Home  freezer 


Subregion  89 


1949        1954 


13.033 


414 
358 
110 
34 


190 
580 
744 


13,  280 


435 

378 

80 

33 


198 
490 
833 


1,521 


Subregion  90 


1949        1954 


052 
504 
212 
117 


192 
423 
764 


1,379 


696 
535 
159 
125 


108 
322 
857 


1,  347 


Subregion  91 


1949        1954 


7.  054 


526 
425 
150 
81 


251 
416 
666 


569 
442 
111 
105 


30 

4 

14 

101 


244 
293 

812 


Subregion  105 


1949 


1,147 
721 
329 
400 


219 
574 
900 


1954 


1,304 
769 
281 
512 


36 


4 
46 


386 

579 

1,004 


1,969 


30 
85 
52 


WHEAT  PRODUCERS  AND  WHEAT  PRODUCTION 


29 


Tabic  68. — A  Comparison  of  Some  Items  for  Organization, 
Expenses,  and  Home  Facilities  for  Cash-Grain  Farms  in 
the  White  Wheat  Region:  1954  and  1949 


Total  farms __ 

Acres  per  farm: 

All  land 

Cropland 

Wheat -- 

Land  pastured 

Livestock— number  per  farm: 

All  cattle.. 

Milk  cows 

H  ops -  -  

Chickens 

Expenditures  per  farm  (dollars): 
Machine  hire 

Hired  labor —   

Gas  and  oil 

Total 

Home  facilities— percent  of  farms  reporting 

Telephone 

Electricity 

Home  freezer 


SubreRlon  110 

1949 

1954 

8,165 

9,109 

1,  147 
835 
3H4 
340 

1,188 
793 
2S4 
368 

22 

4 
39 

28 
1 
4 

39 

312 
1,577 

991 

369 
1,638 
1,199 

2,880 

3,206 

76 
92 
37 

82 
96 
64 

The  number  of  cattle  increased  in  all  subregions.  This  was 
related  to  the  increase  in  acres  pastured,  but  particularly  it  was 
the  result  of  increased  cattle  production  during  the  period  of 
high  cattle  prices  prior  to  1052. 

Comparable  items  of  expense  for  the  two  Census  years  are 
machine  hire,  hired  labor,  and  gasoline  and  oil.  The  total  of 
these  expenses  per  farm  is  nearly  the  same  for  the  2  Census  years 
in  several  subregions,  but  there  were  changes  in  expenditures  for 
individual  items.  Machine  hire  and  hired  labor  decreased  in 
those  areas  where  the  wheat  acreage  declined  significantly.  How- 
ever, in  subregion  110  both  machine  hire  and  hired  labor  expenses 
increased  from  1949  to  1954. 

The  proportion  of  farms  with  telephones,  electricity,  and  home 
freezers  increased  in  all  eight  subregions.  Many  rural  communi- 
ties in  the  Great  Plains  did  not  have  electricity  until  after  World 
War  II,  and  some  electric  lines  were  constructed  after  1949. 
This  explains  much  of  the  increase  in  homes  having  electricity 
and  home  freezers.  The  use  of  telephones  increased  slightly 
during  the  5-year  period.  Undoubtedly  the  use  of  these  modern 
conveniences  increased  as  the  conveniences  became  available  to 
farmers  and  farm  families.  Moreover,  a  part  of  the  increase 
resulted  from  the  relatively  good  incomes  received  by  farmers  in 
some  years. 

SOFT  RED  WINTER  WHEAT 

In  the  soft  winter  wheat  area,  other  enterprises  are  more  im- 
portant than  wheat  on  most  farms.  Here,  few  farms  are  classified 
as  wheat  farms,  but  the  total  wheat  production  is  second  only  to 
that  of  the  hard  winter  wheat  region.  The  total  soft  red  winter 
wheat  production  in  1954  was  approximately  200  million  bushels, 
or  one-fifth  of  the  United  States  total. 

The  soft  red  winter  wheat  belt  extends  from  Missouri  to  Penn- 
sylvania. It  includes  most  of  the  wheat-growing  area  in  the 
eastern  half  of  the  United  States.  The  heaviest  wheat  production 
in  this  wide  reach  of  country  occurs  in  the  southern  part  of  the 
Corn  Belt,  although  wheat  is  grown  in  nearly  all  of  the  States. 


Tin-  soft  winter  wheat  region  receives  35  to  50  inches  of  rainfall 
and  most  of  this  falls  during  the  growing  season.  The  prevailing 
high  precipitation  and  humidity  produce  a  soft  kernel,  relatively 
low  in  protein.  The  winters  are  seldom  so  severe  as  to  kill  the 
crop.  High  summer  temperatures  usually  do  not  occur  until  the 
wheat  has  matured. 

The  soils  vary  greatly,  but  most  of  the  wheat  is  grown  on  deep, 
fertile  soils.  The  topography  varies  from  level  to  rolling,  with 
rather  steep  slopes.  Wheat  is  grown  in  rather  small  acreages  per 
farm,  in  rotation  with  other  crops.  The  wheat  machinery  is 
usually  smaller  than  that  used  on  the  Great  Plains.  The  smaller 
sizes  of  machines  are  due  more  to  the  smaller  acreages  of  wheat 
per  farm  than  to  limitations  imposed  by  the  rolling  topography. 

Approximately  80  percent  of  the  total  soft  red  winter  wheat  is 
produced  in  the  Corn  Belt  States  and  Pennsylvania.  Though  a 
relatively  minor  crop,  the  production  of  wheat  has  persisted  here 
for  many  decades.  Farmers  have  found  it  profitable  to  include 
wheat  in  their  diversified  type  of  farming.  The  relationships  of 
wheat  to  other  enterprises  and  to  the  efficient  use  of  resources  are 
the  chief  reasons  for  its  continued  production  in  this  area. 

Cropping  conditions  vary.  Wheat  is  commonly  grown  on 
farms  that  also  produce  corn,  hay,  pasture  crops,  and  frequently 
some  oats,  barley,  or  soybeans.  Wheat  fits  into  a  rotation  with 
such  crops. 

Sometimes  the  wheat  is  seeded  after  soybeans  have  been 
harvested  on  the  same  land  or  after  corn  has  been  cut  for  ensilage. 
Wheat  may  follow  oats  or  bailey  as  these  crops  mature  in  ample 
time  for  the  sowing  of  winter  wheat  afterwards.  In  some  cases, 
wheal  is  seeded  as  a  companion  or  nurse  crop  for  grass  and  legume 
seedings  as  wheat  brings  in  some  income  while  the  hay  or  pasture 
crop  is  becoming  established.  Where  wheat  follows  row  crops, 
only  one  or  two  light  tillage  operations  are  necessary  in  making 
the  seedbed  as  the  land  has  been  tilled  during  the  early  summer. 

Here,  wheat  contributes  to  a  more  efficient  use  of  the  farmer's 
resources.  Power  units,  field  machinery,  and  man-labor  can  be 
used  for  wheat  at  a  time  when  the  other  demands  for  machinery 
and  labor  are  relatively  low.  Preparing  the  seedbed  and  seeding 
of  winter  wheat  come  between  the  last  corn  cultivation  and  corn 
harvest.  Wheat  harvesting  may  conflict  with  hay  harvesting 
and  with  the  cultivation  of  corn  and  soybeans;  but  with  modern 
machinery,  a  small  acreage  of  wheat  can  be  harvested  in  a  very 
short  time.  Many  farmers  have  combines  for  harvesting  other 
small  grains  and  soybeans  or  they  custom-hire  their  combining 
so  no  additional  machinery  is  required  for  wheat. 

Wheat  is  a  desirable  crop  to  many  farmers  because  it  brings  in 
some  cash  at  a  time  when  they  have  few  other  products  to  sell  and 
at  a  time  when  operating  expenses  are  high.  The  winter  wheat 
may  contribute  to  the  livestock  enterprise  by  furnishing  some 
pasture  in  the  fall  and  early  spring.  Some  of  the  wheat  is  fed. 
especially  to  poultry.  Wheat  straw  provides  a  common  source  of 
bedding  for  livestock. 

It  is  doubtful  that  wheat  is  more  profitable  on  an  acre  basis 
than  other  crops,  especially  corn.  It  is  grown  because  of  its  com- 
plementary relationship  to  other  enterprises  and  because  of  the 
relatively  small  increase  in  cash  costs  required  for  its  production. 
The  more  extensive  use  of  labor  and  equipment  reduces  the  cost 
per  unit  of  work.  Through  its  contribution  to  other  enterprises 
and  the  increased  efficiency  in  the  use  of  resources,  wheat  increases 
the  net  returns  for  the  entire  farm  operation.  Wheat  will  un- 
doubtedly continue  to  be  grown  in  this  area  more  widely  known 
for  its  corn,  soybeans,  and  livestock  feeding. 


30 


FARMERS  AND  FARM  PRODUCTION 


More  than  300,000  farmers  grow  some  wheat  in  the  five  major 
soft  red  winter  wheat  States  (see  table  69) .  The  acreage  per  farm 
is  small.  More  than  one-fourth  of  the  producers  had  less  than  10 
acres  in  wheat  in  1954;  and  less  than  1  percent  had  100  acres  or 
more.  The  fact  that  wheat  is  typically  a  small  enterprise  is  even 
more  clearly  illustrated  by  the  number  of  farmers  reporting  the 
quantity  of  wheat  sold.  Seventy-six  percent  of  the  producers  sold 
less  than  1,000  bushels  while  less  than  1  percent  sold  3,000  bushels 
or  more. 


Table  69. — Wheat  Production   in  Selected  States  in  the 
Soft  Red  Winter  Wheat  Area:  1954 

[Data  arc  estimates  based  on  reports  for  only  a  sample  of  farms] 


Item 


Number  of  farms  reporting 
Acreage  (1,000  acres). 

Average  acreage  per  farm: 
Production  (1,000  bush- 
els)  

Yield  per  acre  (bushels) 
Value  of  crop  (1 .000  dol- 
lars)  

Number  of  farms  report- 
ing by  acres  harvested : 

X'nder  10  acres 

10-24  acres 

25-49  acres... 

50-99  acres 

100-199  acres 

200  acres  and  over 

Number  of  farms  report- 
ing bushels  sold: 

Under  too  bushels 

100-499  bushels 

500-999  bushels 

1,000-1,499  bushels.. 

1,500-1,999  bushels 

2,000-2,999  bushels 

3,000-4,999  bushels 

5,000-9,999  bushels 

10,000  bushels  and  over- 


Total  for 
selected 
States 


336,  894 
6,342 


181,  309 
29 


95,  928 
163,  241 
59,  112 
15,  803 
2,212 


17,506 

169,  819 

68,  849 

22, 186 

8,001 

5,179 

1,967 

533 

54 


Missouri 


50,  309 
1,156 


32,  455 
28 

66,  532 


9,074 

26,917 

9,801 

3,695 

698 

124 


2,101 

25,  499 

11,045 

3,990 

1,773 

1,256 

538 

167 

22 


Illinois 


60,137 
1,532 


46,  241 
30 


7,131 

30,  337 

16.516 

5.324 

750 

79 


1,  626 

25.  942 

17,  389 

6,940 

2,759 

2,068 

784 

212 

17 


64,; 
1,5 


38,  779 
30 


12,923 

35,  278 

13,  243 

2,974 

329 

43 


2,  006 

34,  127 

16,  395 

5,404 

1,864 

956 

355 

81 


Ohi. 


99,  354 
1,704 


45,417 
27 


31.177 
48,501 
16,046 
3.217 
380 
33 


6,155 

54,911 

18,  637 

4,832 

1,350 

766 

250 

53 


Pennsyl- 
vania 


62, 004 
661 


18.417 
28 


35,  913 


35,  623 

22,  208 

3,506 

593 

55 

19 


5.558 

29.  340 

5,383 

1,020 

255 

133 

40 

20 

2 


WHEAT  PRODUCTION  IN  OTHER  WESTERN 
REGIONS 

The  heaviest  concentration  of  wheat  production  is  found  in 
those  regions  that  have  been  described  as  the  major  wheat  regions. 
Much  of  the  remainder  of  the  Great  Plains  and  the  Rocky  Moun- 
tains area  has  been  classed  as  the  range  livestock  region  where 
livestock  provides  the  major  source  of  income.  However,  scat- 
tered through  this  vast  region  are  localities  in  which  considerable 
wheat  is  grown.  In  these  subregions  there  were  27,000  cash-grain 
farmers,  in  1954,  that  produced  more  than  67  million  bushels  of 
wheat.     Data  regarding  these  subregions  are  given  below  for  1954. 


Subregion 

Number  of 

cash -grain 

farms 

Acres  of 
wheat 

Bushels 
produced 

101 

7,  257 
3,332 
6,902 
3,969 
5,757 

1,000 

1,117 
673 

1,217 
385 
637 

1,000 

104 

9,056 

106 

109.. 

8.816 
13.  291 

112 

Total 

27,  217 

4,029 

In  addition  to  that  produced  by  these  wheat  farmers,  a  large 
quantity  of  wheat  is  grown  by  ranchers  who  combine  stock- 
ranching  with  wheat  farming.  Most  of  these  have  been  classified 
as  livestock  farms  because  livestock  is  their  most  important  source 
of  sales. 


Wheat  is  grown  in  these  areas  under  a  variety  of  production 
conditions.  Much  of  it  is  grown  in  dry-land  areas  where  summer- 
fallowing  is  necessary.  Some  is  grown  in  high  mountain  valleys 
and  some  on  irrigated  farms,  particularly  in  Idaho  and  California, 
in  rotation  with  other  crops.  The  average  yield  in  1954  was  17 
bushels  which  compares  favorably  with  the  yields  in  the  major 
wheat  regions. 

SOME  PRODUCTION  PROBLEMS  OF  WHEAT 
FARMERS 

Some  of  the  production  problems  which  specialized  wheat 
farmers  are  facing  merit  more  specific  consideration  in  a  review 
of  the  wheat  industry. 

Wheat  farms  in  the  major  regions  are  large  in  comparison  with 
other  types  of  farms.  But  many  wheat  growers  still  face  the 
problem  of  acquiring  control  of  sufficient  resources  to  make  a 
satisfactory  living.  Continuous  improvement  in  labor-saving 
equipment  enables  each  worker  to  take  care  of  more  acres  of  wheat- 
land  from  year  to  year;  therefore,  more  and  more  acres  of  cropland 
per  worker  are  required  if  modern  machinery  is  to  be  used 
efficiently.  There  has  been  a  gradual  increase  in  size  of  wheat 
farms.  This  increase  is  indicated  for  typical  counties  in  the 
wheat  areas  in  table  70. 

Table  70. — Changes  in  Size  of  Farms  in  Counties  Which  are 
Typical  of  the  Various  Wheat  Regions:  1910-1954 


Countv,  State,  and  subregion 

Average  size  of  farm  (acres) 

1910 

1920 

1930 

1940 

1915 

1950 

1954 

252 
326 
460 
182 

229 
321 
(') 
566 

255 
387 
442 
196 

234 

500 
480 
715 

247 
434 
441 
202 

249 
594 
600 
906 

261 
454 
458 
231 

248 

866 

706 

1,038 

276 
547 
503 
256 

251 
1,148 

905 
1,225 

302 
604 
525 
279 

305 
1,175 
1,048 
1,335 

325 

Ward,  N.  Dak.— (subregion  90)   .. 

650 

580 

311 

Saline,  Kans. — (subregion  94) 

Kit  Carson,  Colo.— (subregion  103) 

374 
1,267 
1,092 

Lincoln,  Wash. — (subregion  110) 

1,447 

1  Not  organized  until  1913. 

The  wheat-pea  farms  of  Washington  and  Idaho  serve  as  an 
example  of  the  growing  problem  of  acquiring  sufficient  capital.3 
Changes  in  size  of  farm,  value  of  real  estate,  and  working  capital 
from  1935  to  1953  were  as  follows: 


Item 


Acres  per  farm number. 

Value  of  real  estate dollars. 

Working  capital dollars- 
Total  investment dollars. 


1935 


22,  173 
3.934 


26.  107 


1940 


29,  057 
6,912 


35,  969 


1945 


51,  162 
13,  379 


64,541 


1950 


89,  759 
17,  847 


107,  606 


1953 


111,616 
23,  729 


A  part  of  the  change  in  dollar  investment  was  due  to  change  in 
price  level.  Changes  have  been  somewhat  more  rapid  in  this 
wheat-pea  area  than  in  some  other  wheat  areas  during  the  last  20 
years,  but  somewhat  similar  increases  can  be  noted  in  other 
regions. 

High  capital  requirements  represent  a  serious  problem  to  many 
farmers.  This  is  especially  true  of  a  beginning  farmer.  Even 
though  he  starts  as  a  tenant,  the  large  amount  of  working  capital 
required  to  operate  an  efficient  unit  is  difficult  to  acquire.  If  the 
young  farmer  starts  with  little  capital  on  a  relatively  small  farm 
his  net  income  may  not  be  enough  to  accumulate  the  capital  needed 
for  the  essential  operation  of  a  more  efficient  unit.  All  of  his 
income  is  likely  to  be  needed  to  pay  family  living  and  operating 
expenses. 


'  Hurd,  Edgar  B.,  "Wheat-Pea  Farming  in  Washington  and  Idaho,  1935-53."  Circular  No.  954.  U.  S.  D.  A..  Washington,  D.  C. 


WHEAT  PRODUCERS  AND  WHEAT  PRODUCTION 


31 


A  related  problem  facing  wheat  and  other  farmers  is  in  making 
the  adjustments  to  the  rapid  changes  in  modern  technology. 
Obtaining  proper  adjustment  in  mechanization  and  size  of  farms 
is  often  difficult.  As  farmers  attempt  to  increase  the  size  of  their 
farm,  land  becomes  difficult  to  acquire.  Thus,  many  farmers  con- 
tinue to  find  themselves  either  operating  their  land  with  inefficient 
equipment  or  having  the  modern  machinery  but  being  unable  to 
operate  efficiently  for  a  lack  of  sufficient  land. 

The  continual  increase  in  the  average  size  of  farms  in  the  wheat 
areas  does  not  appear  to  indicate  an  end  to  family  farms  or  t  hat  the 
land  is  rapidly  falling  into  corporate  hands.  It  is  an  indication 
that,  with  modern  equipment,  the  farm  family  finds  it  can  operate 
a  much  larger  acreage  than  was  formerly  possible.  But  the 
decrease  in  number  of  families  on  the  land  does  have  economic  and 
social  implications  for  individuals  and  the  community  and  it 
means  much  larger  investments  in  the  farm  business  and  fewer 
families  to  support  local  government,  local  schools,  churches,  roads, 
recreational  facilities,  and  community  activities.  But  more 
prosperous  families,  though  fewer,  may  mean  eventually  a  more 
satisfactory  community  situation  than  is  formed  among  a  larger 
number  of  families  having  very  low  incomes. 

The  seasonality  of  labor  requirements  is  another  problem  of 
specialized  wheat  producers  in  that  most  of  the  work  on  wheat 
farms  comes  during  a  four  to  six  months  period.  In  many  parts 
of  the  wheat  regions  where  annual  rainfall  is  20  inches  or  less,  the 
opportunities  for  diversification  are  limited.  Wheat  has  a  decided 
advantage  over  other  crops  and  farm  operators  find  their  highest 
returns  in  specialized  wheat  production.  This  does  not  permit 
full  use  of  family  labor  and  equipment  on  a  yearly  basis.  Seasonal 
labor  requirements  for  a  typical  wheat  farm  are  as  follows: 

Monthly  Percentage  Distribution  of  Labor  Required  for  Wheat 
Production  ' 


>, 

.c 

Region 

rt 

3 

.a 

3 

& 

d 

0 

3 

d 

7, 

0, 

a 
3 

>-s 

>. 

3 
>-> 

be 
3 
< 

CO 

O 

> 

a 

Hard    winter    wheat— Okla- 

4 
9 

is 

21 
?, 

24 
33 

24 
26 

12 

111 

X 

IS 

Soft  winter  wheat— Illinois- .. 

2 

2 

2 

7 

31 

20 

26 

7 

2 

i 

2 

11 

6 

6 

28 

15 

14 

13 

5 

!  Hecht,  Reuben  W. — Farm  Labor  Requirements  in  the  United  States.    1947— Spe- 
cial report  by  the  Bureau  of  Agricultural  Economics  17.  S.  D.  A. 

Table  71- — Annual  Precipitation  (Inches  of  Rainfall)  at 
Representative  Weather  Stations  in  the  Great  Plains 
Wheat  Area:  1931-52 


Year 

Wood- 
ward, 
Okla. 

Colby. 
Kans. 

Dal  ton, 
Xehr. 

Aberdeen, 
S.  Dak. 

Dickinson, 
N.  Dak. 

Bank, 
Mont. 

Moro, 
Oreg. 

1931..  

1932 

1933 

1934 

1935..- 

1936 

1937 

1938 

1939.. 

1940 

1941 

1942. 

1943 

1944 

1945  . 
1946 

1947 

1948 

1949 

1950 

1951... 
1952 

Average 

30 
29 
17 
24 
21 

18 
20 
30 
20 
23 

46 
26 
21 
33 
22 
27 

24 
26 
28 
31 
24 
15 

25 

16 

15 
18 
9 
13 

12 
15 
18 
15 
16 

31 
21 
14 
29 
20 
28 

17 
20 
27 
16 
23 
14 

18 

13 
13 
18 

12 
20 

11 
13 
22 
10 

10 

22 
25 
14 
19 
23 
15 

211 
13 
19 
IS 
22 
17 

17 

19 
20 
13 
15 
24 

14 
25 
17 
22 
16 

21 
28 

22 
28 
19 
22 

21 
15 
20 
18 
19 
14 

2(1 

16 
17 
12 
8 
15 

10 
17 
16 

17 

31 
20 

15 

20 

12 
14 

17 
16 
11 
15 

17 
12 

16 

9 
14 

9 
12 

5 

12 
11 
14 
8 
13 

11 
13 
10 
8 
12 
14 

13 

16 

10 
9 
17 

8 

11 

12 
11 
11 
10 

10 
15 
11 
8 
15 

13 
16 
13 

8 
13 

8 

14 
16 

16 
14 
10 

12 

Source:  Climatic  Summary  of  United  States  —United  States  Weather  Bureau. 


Wheat  production  in  the  Great  Plains  area  is  often  regarded  as  a 
high  risk  enterprise.  The  variability  in  climatic  conditions  together 
with  insects  and  diseases  results  in  considerable  variation  from 
year  to  year  in  wheat  production  and  farm  income. 

The  climatic  hazards  facing  the  farmer  in  this  region  are  illus- 
trated by  the  variation  in  annual  rainfall  (see  table  71].  The  year- 
to-year  variations  may  exceed  10(1  percent.  Much  of  the  Great 
Plains  is  also  a  high  hail  risk  area.  The  hazards  of  crop  failure  are 
particularly  serious  to  the  farmer  who  is  in  debt  and  has  no 
financial  reserves.  Added  to  this  crop  uncertainty  is  the  high  cash 
cost  of  operation. 

In  contrast  to  conditions  of  a  few  decades  ago,  farmers  now 
have  much  higher  costs  for  machinery  upkeep;  he  buys  all  the  fuel 
he  needs  for  power;  he  spends  much  more  for  insect,  disease,  and 
weed  control;  he  faces  much  higher  cash  living  costs  and  in  some 
areas,  spends  more  for  commercial  fertilizer.  The  following  data 
from  the  Agricultural  Research  Service  studies 4  indicates  the 
increase  in  total  cash  farm  expenditures  per  farm: 

Type  of  farm  1937-411947-49     1954 

Wheat,  corn,  livestock  farms,  Northern 

(ireat  Plains $1,431     $4,  330  $4,  457 

Wheat,    small    grain,    livestock    farms, 

Northern  Great  Plains..  1,  614       5,  104     5,  129 

Wheat,      roughage,      livestock      farms, 

Northern  Great  Plains 1 ,  306       4,  363     4,  829 

Winter    wheat    farms,    Oklahoma    and 

Kansas 1,839        4.  493     4.90.", 

Wheat-pea     farms,     Washington     and 

Idaho 3,484       7,117     9,159 

The  lack  of  alternatives  is  a  major  problem  to  many  wheat 
farmers.  In  many  areas  they  cannot  easily  shift  to  other  crops  or 
increase  livestock  whenever  conditions  seem  unfavorable  for 
wheat.  Many  wheat  producers  in  the  Great  Plains,  however,  do 
combine  wheat  and  livestock  production.  Through  much  of  this 
wheat  region  there  is  land  that  is  not  suitable  for  cultivation.  It 
can  be  utilized  only  by  grazing.  Consequently,  the  farmers  may 
keep  sufficient  livestock  to  make  use  of  the  feed  available.  This 
type  of  farm  organization  helps  to  improve  the  efficiency  in  use 
of  labor  and  equipment- 
Many  have  suggested  putting  much  of  the  Great  Plains  wheat- 
land  back  into  grass  and  using  it  for  livestock  production.  But 
farmers  who  are  willing  to  seed  the  land  back  to  grass  and  go  into 
livestock  production  have  important  questions  to  consider.  The 
high  investment  required  for  putting  land  into  grass  is  a  deterrent. 
Establishing  grass  in  the  low  rainfall  areas  is  difficult,  especially 
since  farmers  are  likely  to  consider  shifts  to  grass  only  when 
conditions  are  dry  and  wheat  yields  are  low.  Such  conditions  are 
not  favorable  for  establishing  grass  and  obtaining  a  living  from 
livestock.  Often  the  grass  seedings  fail  entirely;  or,  when  the 
establishment  of  grass  is  partially  successful,  several  years  are 
required  to  produce  sufficient  feed  for  livestock  production. 
Under  such  conditions,  the  waiting  for  income  from  livestock  pro- 
duction and  the  risks  involved  give  rise  to  important  problems  to 
many  farmers. 

These  are  some  of  the  production  problems  wheal  farmers  face. 
The  fact  that  in  its  original  state  land  in  the  Great  Plains  was 
better  suited  to  gra/.ing  than  to  farming  does  not  necessarily  pro- 
vide the  answer  to  the  farmer  who  has  such  land  which  has  been 
broken  out  in  a  period  when  wheat  was  very  profitable.  And  the 
fact  that  a  man  could  operate  a  farm  and  get  ahead  financially  in 
the  past  even  though  he  had  little  capital  to  work  with,  offers  little 
promise  to  the  farmer  who  is  producing  wheat  in  this  age  of  highly 
mechanized  farming. 


'Farm  Costs  anil  Returns  on  Commercially  Operated    Farms    Agriculture  Infor- 
mation Bulletin  158.     ARS     U.  S.  D.  A— 1956. 

U.    5.   G0VERNMFNT    PRINTING    OFFICE     195)