Given By
ES.SLTT. CfDOr:-
^--TT^f
DEPOSITORY
Vol. ill - pt. 9 ch.
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
IN THE UNITED STATES
(A COOPERATIVE REPORT)
Cotton Producers and
Cotton Production
B«ton Public JLibrary ^ f 3 H' '^ I "^^ ^/
Superintendent of Documents ,^ <*^//
SPECIAL REPORTS aug26 1957 ^/,^
1954
Census
f
Agriculture
{^■^
^.^■^
/ 5
'^
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
i te r\ AJ
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE
WASHINGTON • 1956
p ■^^.■.
U. S. Department of Agriculture
Ezra Taft Benson, Secretary
Agricultural Research Service
Byron T. Shaw, Adminiitrafor
U. S. Department of Commerce
Sinclair Weeks, Secretary
Bureau of the Census
Robert W. Burgess, Director
United States
c
ensus
of
Agriculture:
1954
Volume III
SPECIAL REPORTS
Part 9
Farmers and Farm Production in the United States
(A Cooperative Report)
Chapter 11
Cotton Producers and
Cotton Production
CHARACTERISTICS OF FARMERS and FARM PRODUCTION •
PRINCIPAL TYPES OF FARMS •
BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
Robert W. Burgess, Director
AGRICULTURE DIVISION
Ray Hurley, Chief
Warder B. Jenkins, Assistant Chief
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE
Byron T. Shaw. Administrator
FARM AND LAND MANAGEMENT RESEARCH
Sherman E. Johnson, Director
PRODUCTION ECONOMICS RESEARCH BRANCH
Carl P. Heisig, Chief
SUGGESTED IDENTIFICATION
U. S. Bureau of the Census. U. S. Census of Agriculture: 1954. Vol. Ill, Special Reports
Part 9, Farmers and Farm Production in the United States.
Chapter II, Cotton Producers and Cotton Production
U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D. C, 1956.
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D. C.
or any of the Field Offices of the Department of Commerce, Price 40 cents (paper cover)
PREFACE
The purpose of this report is to present an analysis of the cliaracteristics of farmers and farm production
for the most important types of farms as shown by data for the 1954 Census of Agriculture. The analysis
deals with the relative importance, pattern of resource use, some measures of efficiency, and problems of
adjustment and change for the principal types of farms.
The data given in the various chapters of this report have been derived largely from the special tabula-
tion of data for each type of farm, by economic class, for the 195-4 Census of Agriculture. The detailed
statistics for each type of farm for the United States and the principal subregions appear in Part 8 of Volume
III of the reports for the 1954 Census of Agriculture.
This cooperative report was prepared under the direction of Ray Hurley, Chief of the Agriculture Divi-
sion of the Bureau of the Census, U. S. Department of Commerce, and Kenneth L. Bachman, Head, Produc-
tion, Income, and Costs Section, Production Economics Research Branch, Agricultural Research Service of
the U. S. Department of Agriculture.
Jackson V. McElveen, Agricultural Economist, Production, Income, and Costs Section, Production
Economics Research Branch, Agricultural Research Service of the U. S. Department of Agriculture, super-
vised a large part of the detailed planning and analysis for the various chapters.
The list of chapters and the persons preparing each chapter are as follows:
Chapter VI Western Stock Ranches and Live-
stock Farms
Mont H. Saunderson,
Western Ranching and Lands
Consultant,
Bozeman, Mont.
Chapter VII Cash-grain and Livestock Pro-
ducers in the Corn Belt
Edwin G. Strand,
Production Economics Research
Branch,
Agricultural Research Service,
United States Department of
Agriculture.
Chapter VIII. ^ Part-time Farming
H. G. Halcrow,
University of Connecticut.
Chapter IX Agricultural Producers and Pro-
duction in the United States —
A General View
Jack,son V. McElveen,
Production Economics Research
Branch,
Agricultural Research Service,
United States Department of
Agriculture.
The editorial work for tliis report was performed by Caroline B. Sherman, and the preparation of the
statistical tables was supervised by Margaret Wood.
Chapter I Wheat Producers and Wheat
Production
A. W. Epp,
University of Nebraska.
Chapter II Cotton Producers and Cotton
Production
Robert B. Glasgow,
Production Economics Research
Branch,
Agricultural Research Service,
United States Department of
.Agriculture.
Chapter III Tobacco and Peanut Producers
and Production
R. E. L. Greene,
University of Florida.
Chapter IV Poultry Producers and Poultry
Production
William P. Mortenson,
University of Wisconsin.
Chapter V Dairy Producers and Dairy Pro-
duction
P. E. IVIcNaU,
LTniversity of Wisconsin.
December 1956
UNITED STATES CENSUS OF AGRICULTURE: 1954
REPORTS
Volume I. — Counties and State Economic Areas. Statistics for counties include number of farms, acreage, value, and farm operators;
farms by color and tenure of operator; facilities and equipment; use of commercial fertilizer; farm labor; farm expenditures; livestock and
livestock products; specified crops harvested; farms classified by type of farm and by economic class; and value of products sold by soiu^ce.
Data for State economic areas include farms and farm characteristics by tenure of operator, by type of farm, and by economic class.
Volume I is published in 33 parts.
Volume 11. — General Report. Statistics by Subjects, United States Census of Agriculture, 1954. Summary data and analyses of
the data for States, for Geographic Divisions, and for the United States by subjects.
Volume III. — Special Reports
Part 1. — Multiple-Unit Operations. This report wiU be similar to
Part 2 of Volume V of the reports for the 1950 Census of Agri-
culture. It will present statistics for approxuiiately 900
counties and State economic areas in 12 Southern States and
Missouri for the number and characteristics of multiple-unit
operations and farms in multiple units.
Part 2. — Ranking Agricultural Counties. This special report will
present statistics for selected items of inventory and agricul-
tural production for the leading counties in the United States.
Part 3. — Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, District of Columbia, and
U. S. Possessions. These areas were not included in the 1954
Census of Agriculture. The available current data from vari-
ous Government sources will be compiled and published in
this report.
Part 4. — Agriculture, 1954, a Graphic Summary. This report will
present graphically some of the significant facts regarding
agriculture and agricultural production as revealed by the 1954
Census of Agriculture.
Part 5. — Farm-Mortgage Debt. This will be a cooperative study
by tlic Agricultural Research Service of the U. S. Department
of Agriculture and the Bureau of the Census. It will present,
by States, data based on the 1954 Census of Agriculture and a
special majl survey conducted in January 1956, on the num-
ber of mortgaged farms, tlie amoinit of mortgage debt, and the
amount of debt held by principal lending agencies.
Part 6. — Irrigation in Humid Areas. This cooperative report by
the Agricultural Research Service of the U. S. Department of
Agriculture and the Bureau of the Census will present data ob-
tained by a mail survey of operators of irrigated farms in 28
States on the source of water, method of applying water, num-
ber of pumps used, acres of crops irrigated in 1954 and 1955,
the number of times each crop was irrigated, and the cost of
irrigation equipment and the irrigation system.
Part 7. — Popular Report of the 1954 Census of Agriculture. This
report is planned to be a general, easy-to-read publication for
the general public on the status and broad characteristics of
United States agriculture. It will seek to delineate such as-
pects of agriculture as the geograpliic distribution and dif-
ferences by size of farm for such items as farm acreage, princi-
pal crops, and important kinds of livestock, farm facilities,
farm equipment, use of fertilizer, soil conservation practices,
farm tenure, and farm income.
Part 8. — Size of Operation by Type of Farm. This will be a coop-
erative special report to be prepared in cooperation with the
Agricultural Research Service of the U. S. Dei^artment of Agri-
culture. This report will contain data for 119 economic sub-
regions (essentially general type-of-farming areas) showing the
general characteristics for each type of farm by economic class.
It will provide data for a current analysis of the differences
that exist among groups of farms of the same type. It will
furnish statistical basis for a realistic examination of produc-
tion of such commodities as wheat, cotton, and dairy products
in connection with actual or proposed governmental policies
and programs.
Part 9. — Farmers and Farm Production in the United States.
The purpose of this report is to present an analysis of the
characteristics of farmers and farm production for the most
important types of farms as shown by data for the 1954 Census
of Agriculture. The analysis deals with the relative importance,
pattern of resource use, some measures of efficiency, and prob-
lems of adjustment and change for the principal types of farms.
The report was prepared in cooperation with the Agricultural
Research Service of the U. S. Department of Agriculture.
The list of chapters (published separately only) and title
for each chapter are as follows:
Chapter I — Wheat Producers and Wheat Production
II — Cotton Producers and Cotton Production
III — Tobacco and Peanut Producers and Production
IV — Poultry Producers and Poultry Production
V — Dairy Prodzicers and Dairy Production
VI — Western Stock Ranches and Livestock Farms
VII — Cash-Grain and Livestock Producers in the Corn
Belt
VIII — Part-Time Farming
IX — Agricultural Producers and Production in the
United States — A General View
Part 10. — Use of Fertilizer and Lime. The purpose of this report
is to present in one publication most of the detailed data com-
piled for the 1954 Census of Agriculture regarding the use of
fertilizer and lime. The report presents data for counties.
State economic areas, and generalized type-of-farming areas
regarding the quantity used, acreage on which used, and
expenditures for fertilizer and lime. The Agricultural Research
Service cooperated with the Bureau of the Census in the prep-
aration of this report.
Part 11. — Farmers' Expenditures. This report presents detailed
data on expenditures for a large number of items used for farm
production in 1955, and on the living expenditures of farm
operators' families. The data were collected and compiled
cooperatively by the Agricultural Marketing Service of the
U. S. Department of Agriculture and the Bureau of the Census.
Part 12. — Methods and Procedures. This report contains an
outline and a description of the methods and procedures used
in taking and compiling the 1954 Census of Agriculture.
INTRODUCTION
CO
<;
w
<
o
z
o
u
w
<:
Q
<
CO
z
o
3
CQ
D
uo
U
s
o
z
o
u
w
/
"^
^
r — 1^!3^~~^
1&
«Ht 1
<
- r"^
^
i \ "
\:
'*-^"3~t^
~~^
\
•f^
s
f
B
\
"i^
TN^
^^W^^^iypPSi^^^Hit^
i
\
L
-vs;?'5v r G^
S^^'^^^'^J^ "/"^-^
I
X
\2
0r\"i
Sj*^
■ ^~r Ji ' V
T**'^*^
XT 7 " 1^
k V'^ >*J^'^X_'^*'s^'=*V » •C!! \ VT £*>
W T^.
\ Lj~ ik>-J^^x_>^C.^> t^^ Z. "^^
V
U)
" — 3 ^
WoiT ^L^
"nislji ^t°^^ z-^' " \Si*'itrvj#s^
A,
«*5
>^
^ — \y\ ■*
r :
^5Q"\
i 1 5s5;jX 5>yN> '. P \y^\ZT\
'%
j^
7
o» \ ,
J '
..1 7
Tsfic
^-rvfec^^ l-'7^K-u^l?l''V^^^^^^
J />
r'-v
r
'v
"V
CM
5i-i^Vi^ ^5V\ B^ Mrs;
Vv
fCT*-
4
"—J
/
cf^^
T^h S l*"r-i\*0/jL \ LS\ ?'"'^-i'^ 1*^
?i,1
^feC--
w
^
a
r^
^\-jJ^ — rA'
"R^ i V 4^K^OV i'--^V"^^^& A
ris
?]s
\(
'X-J
^
C^|SJ^^
"^V
if.
'
J
o
-1
7t
■A «>_
Vy'f^
d:=^
$<
ATI
4-
o
^
s:
irj
,_/^ 11
__l-,;:'?S'S\tU:S4J_,
%'
pJ
^
a
-._
/> "
TT^^^^T^^
It
Js "
11
J
-. - IfjJ ^E*—
[t71 r r '^-V 1 •! rs^s- C P-' r-*.
-<^
1
Qrt \
1/
o
i^
- 1
1— »*
l<o[
WTlk Jj kW rJjCi^ 'Lr
-tjt
^ io »_,
fl>1
y <
o
-■
\^
1
pJ'^Fl-
^ lis 'ii'Y^TCSfe^is^
-W
STV "^
^ c
■^ 'i
3
A
1
J
>Jr-J ( ""
]^" ^^vVT;<>fi^^u:I.
v^
s.
/
o
o-
1 \
1 ^L''-* 1 .' 2~<nI i c-#^-ii^— ^.
/, —
-4
^■^
^ A
i \
<o
^ * S_j— ,^.»L-' St^l r .'v^T'^ i^
&\
\ -
. r
-»-^5
r
r
fa
^SJ
X.' J =
" ^^^ s r 1 ""^v
P
>
-i 'J
?
H
^
o
(— —
— 1
h
^^ J 1 r
"^-T-T
■7^
1— ^
— /^*
-A
J .
>>^
J/l^
J-t'-
^
5
1^
^
c-"
f-
^
u-^
"Sr
--f5n-r--^;ia J i_*js5
J
s
- <
•^
-T
i
?r
?!?
L^<' ?' \''^X^<
2J=
j_ fs'~ ^
f
~ i-r^ ^ Sr--:. — s
i7
-L
4-1
31^
■' 1. 1 nn " -^ u^" — ^ r
t^
— : f^-~^ rutn ^ u^f
n r^i-j !n '-:°> 5-
n — ^*i^ ' /I
J ' ' H r ^ —
Ol
" ^
^
'
f
rfi
^
""I ' r— J ' - J *'
§1-
- L/
]
o,
"~i
_/
^ J ""^^
/
-J — '^
■^^
't^
f
1
1
(5>
^/
r"~T_] ",' ; L,_^
uC
:^j
§
,^
IT
■^ 1
III - : ' " ^
T-J
^
f -
5 1
S ,-.—1-1 J. 1
1 L
-, 1
J
_1
r-^'S^ r
■J c.
t— J L
T
r^
f
X
r~
■J- ''\l^ ) — '
^
y
^
^
""
"~
^
n
y
r
-T-
■—
n
V
^
J
1
J
J
N
/ *^
J
1
J*
I
f
y;
-h
--<
1—
X
y
/
/ -^^ '
\
I
^ J
'i
t<
1
. / J 1 T"
'L
^
v_
•^
,^
'"
^~i
I
J
"
■^?^
-V
J
-^ y 7'^
1^
/
1
s
iii t
/^" L
>
<
' /
$ ^'"L^^^
/
1:1
^fiif
f^""^
/ ^7 r>s
/
5
^
-
/
1
f
J
1
si
y 5
3
2
^1
= 11 si
i!!
»
l$~
7^~
N,
/
\*'"^tA " r — V/ ^ ^
ti
liiii
.U»(J^>^
^
y
/ r
■^"^vTa-fi \Xjr^( ft •
^^
w
° ^j
^ /
• >^\;->Cf\iJ ,»
'
• J
^<
C
i'\S/
w-^ L
-~'"5"Svi*tr^S'-'^^^
I
OOw
\
— ;
^^C^
S,-.
INTRODUCTION
Purpose and scope. — American agriculture is exceedingly diverse
and is undergoing revolutionary changes. Farmers and their
families obtain their income by producing a large variety of
products under a large varietj' of conditions as well as from sources
other than farming. The organization of production, type of
farming, productivity, income, expenditures, size, and character-
istics of operators of the 4.8 million farms in the United States
vary greatly. Agriculture has been a dynamic, moving, adjusting
part of our economy. Basic changes in farming have been occurring
and will continue to be necessary. Adjustments brought by tech-
nological change, by changing consumer wants, by growth of
population, and by changes in the income of nonfarm people, have
been significant forces in changing agriculture since World War II.
The transition from war to an approximate peacetime situation
has also made it necessary to reduce the output of some farm
products. Some of the adjustments in agriculture have not pre-
sented relatively difficult problems as they could be made by the
transfer of resources from the production of one product to another.
Others require substantial shifts in resources and production.
Moreover, a considerable number of farm families, many of whom
are employed full time in agriculture, have relatively low incomes.
Most of these families operate farms that are small when compared
witli farms that produce higher incomes. The acreage of land and
the amount of capital controlled by the operators of these small
farms are too small to provide a very high level of income. In
recent j'ears, many farm families on these small farms have made
adjustments by leaving the farm to earn their incomes elsewhere,
by discontinuing their farm operations, and by earning more non-
farm income while remaining on the farm or on the place they
farmed formerly.
One objective of this report is to describe and analyze some of
the existing differences and recent adjustments in the major types
of farming and farm production. For important commodities and
groups of farms, the report aims to make available, largely from
the detailed data for the 195-1 Census of Agriculture but in a more
concise form, facts regarding the size of farms, capital, labor, and
land resources on farms, amounts and sources of farm income and
expenditures, combinations of crop and livestock enterprises,
adjustment problems, operator characteristics, and variation in use
of resources and in size of farms by areas and for widely differing
production conditions. Those types of farms on which production
of surplus products is important have been emphasized. The
report will provide a factual basis for a better understanding of
the widespread differences among farms in regard to size, resources,
and income. It will also provide a basis for evaluating the effects
of existing and proposed farm programs on the production and
incomes of major types and classes of farms.
Income from nonfarm sources is important on a large number
of farms. About 1.4 million of the 4.8 million farm-operator
families, or about 3 in 10, obtain more income from off-farm sources
than from the sale of agricultural products. IMore than three-
fourths of a million farm operators live on small-scale part-time
farms and ordinarily are not dependent on farming as the main
soiu-ce of family income. These part-time farmers have a quite
different relation to adjustments, changes, and farm problems
than do commercial farmers. A description of and facts regarding
these part-time farms and the importance of nonfarm income for
commercial farms are presented in Chapter 8.
Except for Chapter 8, this report deals with commercial farms
(see economic class of farm). The analysis is limited to the major
types of agricultural production and deals primarily with geo-
graphic areas in which each of the major types of agricultural
production has substantial significance.
Source of data. — Most of the data presented in this report are
from special compilations made for the 1954 Census of Agriculture,
although pertinent data from research findings and surveys of the
U. S. Department of Agriculture, State Agricultural Colleges, and
other agencies have been used to supplement Census data. The
detailed Census data used for this report are contained in Part 8 of
Volume III of the reports of the 1954 Census of Agriculture.
Reference should be made to that report for detailed explanations
and definitions and statements regarding the characteristics and
reliability of the data.
Areas for which data are presented. — Data are presented in
this report primarily for selected economic subregions and for the
United States. The boundaries of the 1 19 subregions used for the
compilation of data on which this report is based are indicated by
the map on page vi. These subregions represent primarily general
type-of-farming areas. Many of them extend into two or more
States. (For a more detailed description of economic subregions,
see the pubUcation "Economic Subregions of the United States,
Series Census BAE; No. 19, published cooperatively by the Bureau
of the Census, and the Bureau of Agricultural Economics, U. S.
Department of Agriculture, July 1953.)
DEFINITIONS AND EXPLANATIONS
Definitions and explanations are given only for some of the more
important items. For more detailed definitions and explanations,
reference can be made to Part 8 of Volume III and to Volume II of
the reports of the 1954 Census of Agriculture.
A farm. — For the 1954 Census of Agriculture, places of 3 or
more acres were counted as farms if the annual value of agricultural
products, exclusive of home-garden products, amounted to $150
or more. The agricultural products could have been either for
home use or for sale. Places of less than 3 acres were counted as
farms only if the annual value of sales of agricultural products
amounted to $150 or more. Places for which the value of agricul-
tural products for 1954 was less than these minima because of crop
failure or other unusual conditions, and places operated at the time
of the Census for the first time were counted as farms if normally
they could be expected to produce these minimum quantities of
agricultural products.
All the land under the control of one person or partnership was
included as one farm. Control may have been through ownership,
or through lease, rental, or cropping arrangement.
Farm operator. — A "farm operator" is a person who operates
a farm, either performing the labor himself or directly supervising
it. He may be an owner, a hired manager, or a tenant, renter, or
sharecropper. If he rents land to others or has land cropped for
him by others, he is listed as the operator of only that land which
he retains. In the case of a partnership, only one partner was
included as the operator. The number of farm operators is con-
sidered the same as the number of farms.
VIII
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
Farms reporting or operators reporting. — Figures for farms
reporting or operators reporting, based on a tabulation of all farms,
represent the number of farms, or farm operators, for which the
specified item was reported. For example, if there were 11,922
farms in a subregion and only 11,465 had chickens over 4 months
old on hand, the number of farms reporting chickens would be
11,465. The difference between the total number of farms and the
number of farms reporting an item represents the number of farms
not having that item, provided the inquiry was answered
completely for all farms.
Farms by type. — The classification of comrrifercial farms by
type was made on the basis of the relationship of the value of
sales from a particular source, or sources, to the total value of all
farm products sold from the farm. In some cases, the type of
farm was determined on the basis of the sale of an individual farm
product, such as cotton, or on the basis of the sales of closely re-
lated products, such as dairy products. In other cases, the type
of farm was determined on the basis of sales of a broader group of
products, such as grain crops including corn, sorghums, all small
grains, field peas, field beans, cowpeas, and soybeans. In order to
be classified as a particular type, sales or anticipated sales of a
product or group of products had to represent 50 percent or more
of the total value of products sold.
The types of commercial farms for which data are shown, to-
gether with the product or group of products on which the classi-
fication is based are:
Product or group of products amount-
ing to 50 percent or more of the
Type of farm value of all farm products sold
Cash-grain Corn, sorghum, small grains, field
peas, field beans, cowpeas, and
soybeans.
Cotton Cotton (lint and seed).
Other field-crop Peanuts, Irish potatoes, sweet-
potatoes, tobacco, sugarcane, sug-
ar beets for sugar, and other
miscellaneous crops.
Vegetable Vegetables.
Fruit-and-nut Berries and other small fruits, and
tree fruits, nuts, and grapes.
Dairy Milk and other dairy products.
The criterion of 50 percent of the
total sales was modified in the
case of dairy farms. A farm for
which the value of sales of dairy
products represented less than 50
percent of the total value of farm
prod\icts sold was classified as a
dairy farm if —
(a) Milk and other dairy prod-
ucts accounted for 30
percent or more of the
total value of products
sold, and
(b) Milk cows represented 50
percent or more of all
cows, and
(c) Sales of dairy products, to-
gether with the sales
of cattle and calves,
amovmted to 50 percent
or more of the total
value of farm products
sold.
Chickens, eggs, turkeys, and other
poultry products.
Cattle, calves, hogs, sheep, goats,
wool, and mohair, provided the
farm did not qualify as a dairy
farm.
Poultry.
Livestock farms other than
dairy and poultry.
Product or group of products amount-
ing to 50 percent or more of the
Type of farm value of all farm products sold
General Farms were classified as general
when the value of products from
one source or group of sources
did not represent as much as 50
percent of the total value of all
farm products sold. Separate
figures are given for three kinds
of general farms:
(a) Primarily crop.
(6) Primarily livestock.
(c) Crop and livestock.
Primarily crop farms are those for
which the sale of one of the
following crops or groups of
crops — vegetables, fruits and
nuts, cotton, cash grains, or other
field crops — did not amount to
50 percent or more of the value
of all farm products sold, but
for which the value of sales for
all these groups of crops repre-
sented 70 percent or more of the
value of all farm products sold.
Primarily livestock farms are those
which could not qualify as dairy
farms, poultry farms, or livestock
farms other than dairy and
poultry, but on which the sale
of livestock and poultry and
livestock and poultry products
amounted to 70 percent or more
of the value of all farm products
sold.
General crop and livestock farms are
those which could not be classi-
fied as either crop farms or live-
stock farms, but on which the
sale of all crops amounted to at
least 30 percent but less than 70
percent of the total value of all
farm products sold.
Miscellaneous This group of farms includes those
that had 50 percent or more of
the total value of products ac-
counted for by sale of horticul-
tural products, or sale of horses,
or sale of forest products.
Farms by economic class. — A classification of farms by eco-
nomic class was made for the purpose of segregating groups of
farms that are somewhat alike in their characteristics and size of
operation. This classification was made in order to present an
accurate description of the farms in each class and in order to
provide basic data for an analysis of the organization of agriculture.
The classification of farms by economic class was made on the
basis of three factors; namely, total value of all farm products
sold, number of days the farm operator worked off the farm, and
the relationship of the income received from nonfarm sources by
the operator and members of his family to the value of all farm
products sold. Farms operated Ijy institutions, experiment sta-
tions, grazing associations, and community projects were classified
as abnormal, regardless of any of the three factors.
For the purpose of determining the code for economic class and
type of farm, it was necessary to obtain the total value of farm
products sold as well as the value of some individual products
sold.
The total value of farm products sold was obtained by adding
the reported or estimated values for all products sold from the
farm. The value of livestock, livestock products except wool and
mohair, vegetables, nursery and greenhouse products, and forest
INTRODUCTION
IX
products was obtained by the enumerator from the farm operator
for each farm. The enumerator also obtained from the farm
operator the quantity sold for corn, sorghums, small grains, hays,
and small fruits. The value of sales for these crops was obtained
by multiplying the quantity sold by State average prices.
The quantity sold was estimated for all other farm products.
The entire quantity produced for wool, mohair, cotton, tobacco,
sugar beets for sugar, sugarcane for sugar, broomcorn, hops, and
mint for oil was estimated as sold. To obtain the value of each
product sold, the quantity sold was multiplied by State average
prices.
In making the classification of farms by economic class, farms
were grouped into two major groups, namely, commercial farms
and other farms. In general, all farms with a value of sales of
farm products amounting to $1,200 or more were classified as
commercial. Farms with a value of sales of $250 to $1,199 were
classified as commercial only if the farm operator worked off the
farm less than 100 days or if the income of the farm operator and
members of his family received from nonfarm sources was less than
the total value of all farm products sold.
Xand in farms according to use. — Land in farms was classified
according to the use made of it in 1954. The classes of land
are mutually exclusive, 1. e., each acre of land was included only
once even though it may have had more than one use during the
year.
The classes referred to in this report are as follows:
Cropland harvested.- — This inoludes land from which crops
were harvested; land from which hay (including wild hay) was
cut; and land in small fruits, orchards, vineyards, nurseries, and
greenhouses. Land from which two or more crops were reported
as harvested was to be counted only once.
Cropland used only for pasture. — In the 1954 Census, the
enumerator's instructions stated that rotation pasture and all
other cropland that was used only for pasture were to be in-
cluded imder this class. No further definition of cropland
pastured was given the farm operator or enumerator. Per-
manent open pasture may, therefore, have been included under
this item or under "other pasture," depending on whether the
enumerator or farm operator considered it as cropland.
Cropland not harvested and not pastured. — This item includes
idle cropland, land in soil-improvement crops only, land on
which all crops failed, land seeded to crops for harvest after
1954, and cultivated summer fallow.
In the Western States, this class was subdivided to show
separately the acres of cultivated summer fallow. In these
States, the acreage not in cultivated summer fallow represents
largely crop failure. There are very few counties in the West-
ern States in which there is a large acreage of idle cropland or
in which the growing of soil-improvement crops is an important
use of the land.
In the States other than the Western States, this general
class was subdivided to show separately the acres of idle crop-
land (not used for crops or for pasture in 1954) . In these States,
the incidence of crop failure is usually low. It was expected
that the acreage figure that exchided idle land would reflect
the acreage in soil-improvement crops. However, the 1954
crop year was one of low rainfall in many Eastern and Southern
States and, therefore, in these areas the acreage of cropland not
harvested and not pastured includes more land on which all
crops failed than would usually be the case.
Cultivated summer fallow. — This item includes cropland
that was plowed and cultivated but left unseeded for several
months to control weeds and conserve moisture. No land
from which crops were harvested in 1954 was to be included
under this item.
Cropland, total. — This includes cropland harvested, cropland
used only for pasture, and cropland not harvested and not
pastured.
Land pastured, total. — This includes cropland used only for
pasture, woodland pastured, and other pasture (not cropland
and not woodland).
423019—57 2
Woodland, total. — This includes woodland pastured and
woodland not pastured.
Value of land and buildings. — The value to be reported was
the approximate amount for which the land and the buildings on
it would sell.
Off-farm work and other income. — Many farm operators receive
a part of their income from sources other than the sale of farm
products from their farms. The 1954 Agriculture Questionnaire
included several inquiries relating to work off the farm and non-
farm income. These inquiries called for the number of days
worked off the farm by the farm operator; whether other members
of the operator's family worked off the farm; and whether the
farm operator received income from other sources, such as sale
of products from land rented out, cash rent, boarders, old age
assistance, pensions, veterans' allowances, unemployment com-
pensation, interest, dividends, profits from nonfarm business,
and help from other members of the operator's family. Another
inquiry asked whether the income of the operator and his family
from off-farm work and other sources was greater than the total
value of all agricultural products sold from the farm in 1954.
Off-farm work was to include work at nonfarm jobs, businesses,
or professions, whether performed on the farm premises or else-
where; also, work on someone else's farm for pay or wages. Ex-
change work was not to be included.
Specified facilities and equipment. — Inquiries were made in
1954 to determine the presence or absence of selected items on
each place such as (1) telephone, (2) piped nmning water, (3)
electricity, (4) television set, (5) home freezer, (6) electric pig
brooder, (7) milking machine, and (8) power feed grinder. Such
facihties or equipment were to be counted even though tem-
porarily out of order. Piped running water was defined as water
piped from a pressure system or by gravity flow from a natural
or artificial source. The enumerator's instructions stated that
pig brooders were to include those heated by an electric heating
element, by an infrared or heat bulb, or by ordinary electric bulbs.
They could be homemade.
The number of selected types of other farm equipment was also
obtained for a sample of farms. The selected kinds of farm
equipment to be reported were (1) grain combines (for harvesting
and threshing grains or seeds in one operation); (2) cornpickers;
(3) pickup balers (stationary ones not to be reported) ; (4) field
forage harvesters (for field chopping of silage and forage crops);
(5) motortrucks; (6) wheel tractors (other than garden); (7)
garden tractors; (8) crawler tractors (tracklaying, caterpillar);
(9) automobiles; and (10) artificial ponds, reservoirs, and earth
tanks.
Wheel tractors were to include homemade tractors but were not
to include implements having built-in power units such as self-
propelled combines, powered buck rakes, etc. Pickup and truck-
trailer combinations were to be reported as motortrucks. School
buses were not to be reported, and jeeps and station wagons were
to be included as motortrucks or automobiles, depending on
whether used for hauling farm products or supplies, or as passenger
vehicles.
Farm labor. — The farm-labor inquiries for 1954, called for the
number of persons doing farmwork or chores on the place during
a specified calendar week. Since starting dat<;s of the 1954 enumer-
ation varied by areas or States, the calendar week to which the
farm-labor inquiries related varied also. The calendar week was
September 26-October 2 or October 24-30. States with the
September 26-October 2 calendar week were: Arizona, California,
Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky,
Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana,
Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico,
X
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont,
Wasliington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. States with the October
24-30 calendar week were : Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Georgia,
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, North
Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia.
Farmwork was to include any work, chores, or planning necessary
to the operation of the farm or ranch business. Housework,
contract construction work, and labor involved when equijiment
was hired (custom work) were not to be included.
The farm-labor information was obtained in three parts:
(1) Operators working, (2) unpaid members of the operator's family
working, and (3) hired persons working. Operators were consid-
ered as working if they worked 1 or more hours; unpaid members
of the operator's family, if they worked 15 or more hours; and
hired persons, if they worked any time during the calendar week
specified. Instructions contained no specifications regarding age
of the persons working.
Regular and seasonal workers. — Hired persons working on
the farm during the specified week were classed as "regular"
workers if the period of actual or expected employment was 150
days or more during the year, and as "seasonal" workers if the
period of actual or expected employment was less than 150 days.
If the period of expected employment was not reported, the
period of employment was estimated for the individual farm
after taking into account such items as the basis of payment,
wage rate, expenditures for labor in 1954, and the type and
other characteristics of the farm.
Specified farm expenditures. — The 1954 Census obtained data
for selected farm expense items in addition to those for fertilizer
and lime. The expenditures were to include the total specified
expenditures for the place whether made by landlord, tenant, or
both.
Expenditures for machine hire were to include any labor in-
cluded in the cost of such machine hire. Machine hire refers to
custom machine work such as tractor hire, threshing, combining,
silo filling, baling, ginning, plowing, and spraying. If part of the
farm products was given as pay for machine hire, the value of the
products traded for this service was to be included in the amount
of expenditures reported. The cost of trucking, freight, and
express was not to be included.
Expenditures for hired labor were to include only cash pay-
ments. Expenditures for housework, custom work, and contract
construction work were not to be included.
Expenditures for feed were to include the expenditures for
pasture, salt, condiments, concentrates, and mineral supplements,
as well as those for grain, hay, and miU feeds. Expenditures for
grinding and mixing feeds were also to be included. Payments
made by a tenant to his landlord for feed grown on the land rented
by the tenant were not to be included.
Expenditures for gasoline and other petroleum fuel and oil were
to include only those used for the farm business. Petroleum
products used for the farmer's automobile for pleasure or used
exclusively in the farm home for heating, cooking, and lighting
were not to be included.
Crops harvested. — The information on crops harvested refers
to the acreage and quantity harvested for the 1954 crop year. An
exception was made for land in fruit orchards and planted nut
trees. In this case, the acreage represents that in both bearing
and nonbearing trees and vines as of October and November 1954.
Hay. — The data for hay includes aU kinds of hay except soy-
bean, cowpea, sorghum, and peanut hay.
livestock and poultry. — The data on the number of livestock
and poultry represent the number on hand on the day of enumera-
tion (October-November 1954). The data relating to livestock
products and the number of livestock sold relate to the sales made
during the calendar .year 1954.
LABOR RESOURCES
The data for labor resources available represent estimates based
largely on Census data and developed for the purpose of making
comparisons among farms of various size of operations. The
labor resources available are stated in terms of man-equivalents.
To obtain the man-equivalents the total number of farm opera-
tors as reported by the 1954 Census were adjusted for estimated
man-years of work olf the farm and for the number of farm opera-
tors 65 years old and over. The farm operator was taken to rep-
resent a full man-equivalent of labor unless he was 65 years or
older or unless he worked at an off-farm job in 1954.
The man-equivalent estimated for farm operators reporting spec-
ified amounts of off-farm work were as follows:
Estimated
Days worked off the farm in 1954 man-equivalent
1-99 days ... 0.85
100-199 days . 50
200 days and over . 15
The man-equivalent for farm operators 65 years of age and older
was estimated at 0.5.
Man-equivalents of members of the farm operator's family were
based upon Census data obtained in response to the question
"How many members of your family did 15 or more hours of farm
work on this place the week of September 26-October 2 (or, in
some areas, the week of October 24-30) without receiving cash
wages?" Each family worker was considered as 0.5 man-equiva-
lent. This estimate provides allowance for the somewhat higher
incidence of women, children, and elderly persons in the unpaid
family labor force.
In addition, the number of unpaid family workers who were
reported as working 15 or more hours in the week of September
26-October 2 was adjusted to take account of seasonal changes in
farm employment. Using published and unpublished findings of
the U. S. Department of Agriculture and State Agricultural Col-
leges, and depending largely upon knowledge and experience with
the geographic areas and type of farming, each author deter-
mined the adjustment factor needed to correct the number of
family workers reported for the week of September 26-October 2
to an annual average basis.
Man-equivalents of hired workers are based entirely upon the
expenditure for cash wages and the average wage of permanent
hired laborers as reported in the 1954 Census of Agriculture.
Value of or investment in livestock. — Numbers of specified
livestock and poultry in each subregion were multiplied by a
weighted average value per head. The average values were com-
puted from data compiled for each kind of livestock for the 1954
Census of Agriculture. The total value does not include the value
of goats. (For a description of the method of obtaining the value
of livestock, see Chapter VI of Volume II of the reports for the
1954 Census of Agriculture.)
Value of investment in machinery and equipment. — The data
on value of investment in machinery and equipment were developed
for the purpose of making broad comparisons among types and
economic classes of farms and by subregions. Numbers of specified
machines on farms, as reported by the Census, were multiplied by
estimated average value per machine. Then the total values ob-
tained were adjusted upward to provide for the inclusion of items
of equipment not included in the Census inventory ot farm
machinerj'.
INTRODUCTION
XI
The estiniatos for average vahie of specified machines and the
proportion of total value of all machinery represented by the
value of these machines were based largely on published and un-
published data from the "Farm Costs and Returns" surveys con-
ducted currently by the Agricultural Research Service, U. S.
Department of Agriculture.' Modifications were made as needed
in the individual chapters on the basis of State and local studies.
The total estimated value of all machinery for all types and
economic classes of farms is approximately equal to the value of
all machinery as estimated by the U. S. Department of Agriculture.
Value of farm products sold, or gross sales. — Data on the
\alue of the various farm products sold were obtained for 1954 by
two methods. First, the values of livestock and livestock prod-
ucts sold, except wool and mohair; vegetables harvested for sale;
nursery and greenhouse products; and forest products were
obtained by asking each farm operator the value of sales. Second,
the values of all other farm products sold were computed. For the
most important crops, the quantity sold or to be sold was obtained
for each farm. The entire quantity harvested for cotton and
cottonseed, tobacco, sugar beets for sugar, hops, mint for oil, and
sugarcane for sugar was considered sold. The quantity of minor
crops sold was estimated. The value of sales for each crop was
computed by multiplying the quantity sold by State average
prices. In the case of wool and mohair, the value of sales was
computed by multiplying the quantity shorn or clipped by the
State average prices.
Gross sales include the value of all kinds of farm products sold.
The total does not include rental and benefit, soil conservation,
price adjustment. Sugar Act, and similar payments. The total
does include the value of the landlord's share of a crop removed
from a farm operated by a share tenant. In most of the tables,
detailed data are presented for only the more important sources
of gross sales and the total for the individual farm products
or sources will not equal the total as the values for the less impor-
tant sources or farm products ha\e been omitted. (For a detailed
statement regarding the reliability and method of obtaining the
valueof farm products sold, reference should be made to Chapter
IXof Volume II of the reports for the 1954 Census of Agriculture.)
Livestock and hvestock products sold. — The value of sales for
livestock and livestock products includes the value of live animals
sold, dairy products sold, poultry and poultry products sold, and
the calculated value of wool and mohair. The value of bees,
honey, fur animals, goats, and goat milk is not included.
The value of dairy products includes the value of whole milk and
cream sold, but does not include the value of butter and cheese,
made on the farm, and sold. The value of poultry and products
includes the value of chickens, broilers, chicken eggs, turkeys,
turkey eggs, ducks, geese, and other miscellaneous poultry and
poultry products sold. The value does not include the value
of baby chicks sold.
Crops sold. — Vegetables sold includes the value of all vegetables
harvested for sale, but does not include the value of Irish potatoes
and sweetpotatoes.
The value of all crops sold includes the value of all crops sold
except forest products. The value of field crops sold includes the
value of sales of all crops sold except vegetables, small fruits and
Ijerries, fruits, and nuts.
1 Farm Costs and Retuiiis. 1955 (with comparisons), Agriculture Information Bulletin No. 158, Agricultural Research Service. U. S. Department of Agriculture, June 1966.
CHAPTER II
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION
CONTENTS
Introduction
Significance of cotton production
Scope and purpose of this report .._
Subregions for which special tabulations are available..
Section 1. — Cotton production by economic class and tj-pe
of farm
The national picture
The picture by regions
Distribution of farms, acreage, and production by eco-
nomic class for all commercial farms
The humid belt rt'gions (Regions I to VI)
The subhumid belt regions (Regions VII and VIII). _
The semiarid and arid cotton production regions (Re-
gions IX and X)
Cotton production on noncommercial farms
Cotton production on cotton farms and on commercial
farms other than cotton farms
Some implications of distribution of cotton production
by economic class and region
Section 2. — Trends in cotton production by regions
Section 3. — Tenure of cotton farms
Proportion of cotton farms operated by croppers
Tenants other than croppers
Face
5
5
6
7
9
9
10
14
14
15
15
15
16
17
18
21
21
22
Section 4. — The land resource and its utilization
Distribution of land, by major uses
Land use and enterprise organization per farm
Total acres per farm
Cropland and cropland use
Cropland utilization
Pasture and woodland
Section 5. — -Labor resources and use
Age of operator
Off-farm use of labor resources
Man-equivalent workers per cotton farm
Total cropland and cotton acres per man-equivalent
Section 6. — Investment on cotton farms
Regional distribution of total investment among eco-
nomic classes
Investment per farm
Investment per acre and per man-equivalent
Section 7. — -Selected measures of farm income and effi-
ciency
Indicated returns per operator and family man-equiva-
lent worker
Investment per dollar of sales
MAPS AND CHARTS
Economic subregions and state economic areas
Acres of cotton harvested as a percent of cropland harvested, 1 954
Cotton farms, number, 1954
Cotton harvested, acreage, for cotton subregions: 1954
Economic regions and subregions for cotton: 1954
Cotton harvested — acreage, 1879 to 1954; and production, 1839 to 1954; for the United States.
Number of farms with less than 25 bales of cotton harvested, for cotton subregions: 1954
Number of farms with 25-49 bales of cotton harvested, for cotton subregions: 1954
Number of farms with 50-99 bales of cotton harvested, for cotton subregions: 1954
Number of farms with 100 or more bales of cotton harvested, for cotton subregions: 1954
23
23
27
27
31
32
38
40
40
42
43
45
46
46
47
48
49
53
53
Page
vi
6
6
7
8
18
34
34
35
35
TABLES
Table— Page
1. — Farms reporting cotton as a percent of all farms and acres of cotton harvested as a percent of cropland harvested, for specified
States: 1930 to 1954 5
2. — Farm cash receipts from cotton and cottonseed as percent of total farm cash receipts, for specified States: 1924 to 1954 5
3. — -Percent distribution of farms reporting cotton, acres of cotton harvested, and bales of cotton produced, by economic class of
farm, for the United States: 1954 and 1949 9
4. — Percent distribution of farms reporting cotton, acres of cotton harvested, and bales of cotton produced, by type of farm, for
the United States: 1954 and 1949 9
5. — Farms reporting cotton, acres of cotton harvested, and cotton production for cotton farms as a percentage of the total for all
commercial farms reporting cotton, for each economic class of farm, for the United States: 1954 10
6. — Number of farms, farms reporting cotton, and acres and bales of cotton harvested, for commercial farms, by economic class
and for noncommercial farms, by regions; 1954 10
7. — -Distribution between cotton farms and commercial farms other than cotton farms, of farms reporting, acres harvested, and
production of cotton on commercial farms, by economic class of farm, by regions: 1954 12
8. — Percent distribution of number of farms and acres and bales of cotton harvested, for cotton farms, by economic class of farm,
by regions: 1954 16
9. — Percent distribution of number of farms reporting cotton and acres and bales of cotton harvested, for commercial farms other
than cotton farms, by economic class, by regions: 1954 16
10. — Cotton acreage, yield per acre, and production for specified 5-year periods, for the United States and regions: 1928 to 1954.. 19
11. — Ratio of change since 1928-32 in acreage, yield, and production of cotton in each region to change for the United States for
specified periods: 1933 to 1954 20
12. — ^Percent distribution of all commercial farm operators, and cotton farm operators in each economic class of farm, by color
and tenure of operator, by regions: 1954 21
3
4 CONTENTS
TABLES— Continued
Table— Page
13. — All land in farms, total cropland, and irrigated land, by economic class of cotton farm, total of ten regions: 1954 23
14. — Land use for cotton farms, by economic class of farm, by regions: 1954 24
15. — Land use on cotton farms per farm, by economic class of farm, by regions: 1954 28
16. — Percent distribution for all commercial farms and for cotton farms in each economic class, by acres in farm, by regions: 1954__ 31
17. — Percent distribution of farms reporting cotton harvested, by acres harvested, for all commercial farms and for cotton farms,
by economic class, by regions: 1954 32
18.- — Percent distribution of cotton farms by acres of cotton harvested, by economic class of farm, by regions: 1954 33
19. — Distribution of farm sales by source, for cotton farms, by economic class, by regions: 1954 36
20. — Average number per farm reporting and percent of farms reporting specified classes of livestock, for cotton farms, by economic
class of farm, by regions: 1954 38
21. — Percent distribution of operators of cotton farms in each age group, by economic class of farm, by regions: 1954 40
22. — Percent distribution of operators of each economic class of cotton farm, by age, by regions: 1954 41
23. — Percent distribution of operators of cotton farms by days of work off farm, by economic class, by regions: 1954 42
24. — Percent of operators of cotton farms vfith other income of family exceeding value of farm products sold, by economic class
of farm, by regions: 1 954 , 42
25. — Total man-equivalent per all commercial farms and per cotton farm, and percent distribution in each economic class of cotton
farm, by type of worker, by regions: 1954 43
26.— Percent distribution of farms reporting specified expenditures for hired labor for cotton farms, by economic class of farm, by
regions: 1954 44
27. — -Acres of cropland harvested and acres of cotton harvested per man-equivalent for cotton farms, by economic class, and by
regions: 1 954 45
28. — Distribution of investment on cotton farms, by economic class, by regions: 1954 46
29. — Total investment and percent distribution of investment per farm for cotton farms, by economic class, by regions: 1954 47
30. — Total investment per acre of all land in farms, per acre of total cropland, and per man-equivalent, for cotton farms, by economic
class, by regions: 1954 48
31. — Total sales, cotton sales, all crop sales, and livestock and livestock products sales per cotton farm, by economic class, and by
regions: 1954 49
32. — Percent of farms reporting and average expenditure for selected items per farm, for cotton farms, by economic class, by regions:
1954 50
33. — Sales minus specified expenses per farm for cotton farms, by economic class, by regions: 1954 61
34. — Estimated interest on investment per farm for cotton farms, by economic class, by regions: 1954 52
35. — Sales per farm minus specified expenses and imputed interest on investment for economic classes of cotton farms, by regions:
1954 52
36. — Sales minus specified expenses (except hired labor) per man-equivalent, for cotton farms, by economic class and regions: 1954. 52
37. — Sales minus specified expenses (except hired labor) and imputed interest on investment per man-equivalent, for cotton farms,
by economic class and regions: 1954 52
38. — Sales minus specified expenses per operator and family worker for cotton farms, by economic class and regions: 1954 53
39. — Sales minus specified expenses and imputed interest on investment per man-equivalent of operator and family workers for
economic classes of cotton farms, by regions: 1954 53
40. — Total investment on cotton farms per dollar of sales, by economic class of farm, by regions: 1954 53
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION
Robert B. Glasgow
INTRODUCTION
SIGNIFICANCE OF COTTON PRODUCTION
Cotton production is one of the most important enterprises
found on American farms. It talies place in only 20 of the 48
States, and is of appreciable significance in only 14 States, yet no
other single crop in this country accounts for so large a projjortion
of total farm, sales. Moreover, e.xcept for dairying, no other
single crop or livestock enterprise accounts for half or more of the
total farm sales on so many farms.
Cotton is grown to a varying e.xtent in all of the 19 States that
have some part of their land south of the 37th parallel of latitude,
and a very small acreage is grown in Kansas just north of this
parallel. States in which cotton is not of appreciable significance
are those having southern borders at or near the 37th parallel. In
addition to Kansas, these are Virginia, Kentucky, lUinois, and
Nevada. In Florida, cotton does not loom large in the agriculture
as a whole.
The 14 remaining States in which cotton production is of con-
siderable significance are shown in tables 1 and 2. These tables
also show some data regarding national and State trends, and
some indications of the relative importance of the cotton enterprise
to the agriculture of the country as a whole, and to the agriculture
Table 1. — Farms Reporting Cotton as a Percent of All Farms and Acres of Cotton Harvested as a Percent of Cropland
Harvested, for Specified States: 1930 to 1954
1954
1950
1945
1940
1930
state
Percent
of farms
Percent of
cropland
harvested
Percent
of farms
Percent of
cropland
harvested
Percent
of farms
Percent of
cropland
harvested
Percent
of farms
Percent of
cropland
harvested
Percent
of farms
Percent of
cropland
harvested
Alabama-
60.2
29.4
46.7
8.0
9,6
47.7
4C.2
72.4
6,8
15,9
28,9
22.5
61.3
27.7
43.0
3,3
18,1
24.0
40,1
3U, 7
10,6
1,7
16,4
22 3
35,2
3,4
17.4
9,5
8.8
23,9
13,0
30.2
0, 5
5,7
68,8
16,0
54,9
6,1
9,9
55.7
51, 6
75,9
7.1
14,6
36,5
28,8
67.0
28.9
46.2
4,1
20.6
32,3
42,2
43.4
10,8
2,5
21.9
29.1
45.1
4,8
15 0
14,6
10,3
:m. 2
1.5,9
37,6
0,9
7, 7
64, n
7,6
67,4
3, 1
"8
53.4
61.3
80,0
7 0
8,4
37 1
37,1
69,4
28,4
45,2
3.8
20.8
22,3
21.5
29,5
3,5
1,4
16,4
23 3
35,4
3,1
5,3
11,7
10,6
24,7
11.2
24.0
0.7
5.4
86.6
10, 8
69, 5
4,0
14,3
77 4
76, 2
89,2
6,5
8,3
37 1
48,4
81,1
31,3
65, 3
4,0
20,1
27.1
34,9
31, 1
4,8
3,5
21, 1
26.9
35,2
3.1
5,7
11,6
13,1
27,2
11,0
31, 1
0,8
7,1
90,1
24,3
79.3
3,2
20.7
80,9
79,6
90,2
6,3
11.9
54,2
60,6
83.2
36.0
79,7
8,2
31,6
,50.1
44.1
52.4
4.6
8,5
40.9
47 8
60.8
2 7
9.1
28.2
26.7
47 7
17 1
,54.9
2 2
12.0
Arkansas
Florida
Georgia
Louisiana-
Missouri . _
New Mexico...
South Carolina.
Texas
Virginia
United States
Table 2. — Farm Cash Receipts From Cotton and Cotton-
seed AS Percent of Total Farm Cash Receipts, for SpecI'
FiED States: 1924 to 1954
Alabama. .
Arizona
Arkansas,.
California -
Florida
Georgia
Louisiana
Mississippi
Missouri
New Mexico
North Carolina.
Oklahoma.
South Carolina,
Teimessee -
Texas..
Virginia
United States,.
1924
1929
1934
1939
1944
1949
Per-
Per-
Per-
Per-
Per-
Per-
C€7U
cent
cent
cent
cent
cent
71.8
74.7
72.4
45.8
47 7
42 3
31.6
32.2
28.3
24.1
17.3
36.4
70.1
68,9
67 9
54.4
50.7
56.7
2 4
3,0
4.6
6.4
2 8
11.7
3.0
2.8
2 4
0.4
0.4
0.6
62.0
68.7
58.3
35.2
28.6
23.7
45.8
53.2
48,2
.35.6
31.1
34.3
77.5
78.2
76,3
67.2
70,2
67 9
8.3
6,6
10.4
9,1
7 2
8,0
13.6
15,3
21.1
10,8
14,1
24.0
40.9
30.6
23.3
10.4
13,9
12.6
52.0
40.2
30.9
14.6
14.2
12,8
69.8
64.4
62.1
46.8
44.8
34.4
29. n
30.6
32 1
19.6
21.8
24.8
70.2
52.9
61.2
,30 7
23.6
37 8
3.7
2.8
3.2
0.6
1.1
0.9
16.2
13.4
13.6
8.0
7.5
9.5
Per-
cent
35.3
60.4
50.9
11.4
0.9
21.3
32,3
60,6
8,9
38.7
8,3
9.9
31.1
23.7
38.0
0.5
9,0
Source: USDA, AMS Statistical Bullctm No. 186.
423019—57 3
of the major cotton-producing States.
Tlie fact that the States that grow cotton constitute a vast
contiguous area extending from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific
precludes consideration of cotton as a regional crop in any usual
sense of that term (see figs. 1 and 2).
Cotton and the salient economic facts and characteristics of
cotton production are of significance to thousands of people who
are not on farms but who are engaged in cotton-oriented services
and processing industries. Problems a.ssociated with cotton pro-
duction even concern all consumers of fibers, for despite the tre-
mendous increase during the last 15 years in the production and
consumption of synthetic fibers, the per capita domestic consump-
tion of cotton has remained relatively stable. In 1954, it ac-
counted for more than two-thirds of all fiber used in the United
States.
A further general fact of widely ramifying import is that, al-
though the United States is, and has long been, the largest single
consumer of cotton, it is also the world's leading exporter of raw
cotton, thus making this commodity a notable factor in the inter-
national trade of the United States.
5
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
<vj5^L^^ OF COTTON HARVESTED AS A PERCENT OF CROPLAND HARVESTED, 1954
'^ (COUNTY UNIT BASIS)
LEGEND
PERCENT
i;:;;-;! UNDER lO ^^ 30 TO 39
^^ 10 TO 19 ^H 40 AND OVER
^^ 20 TO 29 I I NO COTTON
* NO FfARMS
U S OEPflRTMENT OF COMMERCE
MAP NO A54-280
BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
Figure 1.
COTTON FARMS
NUMBER. 1954
UNITED STATES TOTAL
525,208
BmclU Of Tx cottus
Figure 2.
SCOPE AND PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT
It would seem, therefore, that additional information concern-
ing the economic structure, and the resource-use characteristics
of this industry, and of the farms which comprise it, would be
valuable to producers, consumers, handlers, and processors, and
to those responsible for the planning and execution of govern-
mental policy.
Data gathered by the Bureau of the Census have long been a
mainstay of analyses of this type. The Agriculture Census of
lOSi provided, for the first time, special tabulations of farm char-
acteristics for type of farm, cross classified by economic class of
farm. Census types of farms are delineated by the criterion of
the commodity source of 50 percent or more of farm sales. One of
the farm types so established is the cotton farm. This is a farm
on which 50 percent or more of all sales are from cotton and
cottonseed. The economic classes of farms used by Census since
1950 are volume or size-of-business groups classified according to
the value of total sales of farm products. These groups range
from Class I farms, having total sales of $25,000 or more, to
Class VI farms which are characterized by sales of $250 to $1,199.
Analysis of the 1954 Census data made available, for selected
subregious, by the special tabulations of data for cotton farms by
economic class, sheds new light upon the economic structure and
characteristics of the industry of cotton production and of the
farms which comprise it.
Most of this report is concerned with these new data which have
been supplemented by other statistics from the Bureau of the
Census and other sources.
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION
SUBREGIONS FOR WHICH SPECIAL TABULATIONS ARE
AVAILABLE
The special tabulations for cotton farms by economic class were
made for the 30 subregions in which cotton growing is of con-
siderable importance. The location of these subregions and the
distribution of cotton acreage in 1954 is shown in figure 3.
To facilitate the presentation and analysis of the new data the
selected subregions were grouped into 10 regions (see fig. 4).
Regions I through VI, extending from North Carolina to eastern
Texas, comprise most of the humid area of cotton growing in this
country. Moving west, Regions VII and VIII represent the bulk
of production under subhumid climatic conditions. In Region IX
is found the major part of cotton production under semiarid
climatic conditions. Virtually all cotton grown in subregion 103
is found in the more southerly of the Texas counties included.
Much of the crop in this region is irrigated from wells. Region X
encompasses most of the cotton growing under irrigation in the arid
southwest of Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona, and the arid San
Joaquin Valley of California.
The six regions which comprise the humid climatic belt include
some striking differences. The easterumo.st region (Region I)
represents, in general, cotton production on the Eastern Coastal
Plain of the United States. In some places in this region flue-cured
tobacco and peanuts are more important crops than cotton. The
region, in general, has larger reaches of level land than are to be
found in either of the next two regions to the west.
Adjoining the Eastern Coastal Plain to the west is Region
II, the Southern Piedmont. This region has some stretches of level
land but in general it is hilly, and the characteristic fields are
small and irregular in shape.
The next region to the west. Region III, can perhaps be de-
scribed as midsouthern hilly, with some level land. This region
has rather disparate areas within it. Examples are the Black
Prairie (Black Belt) of Alabama and Mississippi, the Sand Moun-
tain area of Alabama, the brown loam areas of Tennessee and
Mississippi, and the sand-clay hills of Alabama, Mississippi, and
Tennessee.
Immediately to the west of Region III lies the fabulous so-
called "Delta" — the Alluvial Vplley of the Mississippi and Red
Rivers, extending from the "B .(ot Heel" of Missouri to the
sugarcane countr.v of southern Louisiana.
Region V is comprised mostly of the Western Sandy Coastal
Plains of northeastern Texas, northwestern Louisiana, and south-
western Arkansas. It also includes the piney woods of eastern
Texas and west central Louisiana, the so-caUed "Post Oak" area
of east central Texas and the Arkansas River Valley and uplands
of central Arkansas. It is in some respects the western counterpart
of Region III.
The final region in the humid belt (Region VI) is coextensive
with subregion 78. It is the Gulf Coast Prairie of Texas and
Louisiana. Most of the cotton here is found in the Texas part;
much of which is on the alluvial lands of the several streams that
find their final passage to the Gulf through this region. The
region includes, also, most of the specialized rice-growing farms
of Texas and Louisiana. These are generally located on the
heavy, rather poorly drained soils most typical of the region.
Cotton and rice are not often grown on the same farms.
yi
COTTON HARVESTED. ACREAGE.
FOR COTTON SUBREGIONS 1954
^•.«=<3»
h=3
UNITED STATES TOTAL
18,858,145
us DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
1 DOT= 10.000 ACRES
MAP NO A54-535
BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
Figure 3.
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
^i
ECONOMIC REGIONS AND SUBREGIONS FOR C0TT0N;I954
YE
/-r"\
^^^ ECONOMIC REGION BOUNDSRt
ECONOMIC SuBREGIONBOUNDflRV
STATE BOUNOatT
AVTTT
Figure 4.
Regions VII and VIII, in the subliumid belt, are most dis-
similar. Tiie first named is composed of tlie Black Prairie of
Texas, the Rio Grande Plains of southern Texas, and the rolling
plains of west central Texas and southwestern Oklahoma. Region
VIII is the lower Rio Grande Vallej' and has, in comjiaratively
recent years, become a rather highly specialized cotton-growing
area. Irrigation is general liere but the water supply, mostly
from the Rio Grande, is generally not adequate to permit irrigation
of all land in cotton.
The final two regions (Regions IX and X) encompass, re-
spectively, most of the cotton production under semiarid and arid
climatic conditions.
In Region IX, most of the cotton is grown in the High Plains of
Texas area. This area was developed for crop farming relatively
late, and it's farms have always been characterized by relatively
large areas of land and other resources per man. Supplemental
irrigation from wells has become a very significant factor in the
agriculture of the cotton-growing section of this region during the
past 10 to 12 years.
In Region X, cotton is grown only under irrigation. Included
in this region are the Trans-Pecos and upper Rio Grande cotton-
producing areas of Texas, nearly all cotton-producing areas in
New Mexico and Arizona, and the fabulous Central Valley of
California.
The 30 subregions included in these 10 regions accounted, in the
aggregate, for 94 percent of all cotton farms and for 97 percent of
both the cotton acreage and production of cotton on sucli farms in
1954. During 19.54, the 30 selected subregions accounted for about
95 to 98 percent of the national total of cotton farms and of cotton
acreage and production on cotton farms for each economic class.
Thus, it seems reasonable to conclude that the cotton farms of
the selected subregions are, in the aggregate, representative of
all cotton farms in the United States. To a remarkable degree
cotton growing is concentrated on farms that are classified as
cotton farms. In 1954, for example, 61 percent of all farms
reporting cotton, and 80 and 84 percent, respectively, of aU cotton
acreage and production were on these farms. So although most of
the data in this report pertain specifically only to the cotton-
farm type, it would seem that most of the aggregate conclusions
indicated could be accepted as applying to the general industry
of cotton production in the United States. Tliis supposition is
buttressed by several facts: {1} These subregions, in 1954,
accounted for 68 percent of the number of commercial farms, other
than cotton farms, that reported cotton, and for 80 percent of
the cotton acreage and production found on these farms. (S) In
that year approximately 90 percent of the noncommercial farms
reporting cotton, and of the cotton acreage and production on these
farms, were encompassed by the selected subregions.
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION 9
Section 1.— COTTON PRODUCTION BY ECONOMIC CLASS AND TYPE OF FARM
THE NATIONAL PICTURE
Informiition on the distributions by economic class of the num-
ber of furms reporting a crop, the acreage harvested, and the
production, contributes notably to our linowledge of the overall
structure of that crop production. Such data show in a general
way the location of production and acreage with respect to the
size of the farm and they are indicative of the income level of the
farmers who grow the crop.
Table 3 shows this type of information for all farms reporting
cotton ir the United States during 19-19 and 1954. Of the number
of commercial farms rejiorting cotton, there was a considerable
concentration in Classes V and VI in both 1949 and 1954. These
classes, together with noncommercial farms, accounted for more
than 60 percent of farms reporting cotton in 1954 and for more than
70 percent in 1949. This means that in 1954 three-fifths of the
farm operators growing cotton had gross farm sales of less than
$2,500. As the noncommercial farms are presumed not to be
primarily dependent upon agriculture for their income, this
indicated low gross income from farming may not be important
to them. But the large number of cotton producers found in
Economic Classes V and VI does suggest that there is a concen-
tration of farmers with low incomes from farming among the cotton
farms. For all farms, the proportions classified as Classes V and
VI were 30.1 in 1949 and 25.7 in 1954. It is thus evident that the
concentration of these low-production commercial farms was al-
most twice as large among farms reporting cotton as among all
farms, in both vears.
An additional fact of interest is the significant decrease from
1949 to 1954 in the proportion that Economic Class VI and non-
commercial farms were of all farms reporting cotton. These
decreases were accompanied by significant increases for 1954
over 1949 in the proportions of all cotton-reporting farms in
Economic Classes I through IV.
There was considerably less concentration of acreage and pro-
duction on these low-production commercial and noncommercial
farms. The stril;ing fact in table 3 about acreage and production
is their concentration, relative to numbers of farms reporting, on
Economic Class I and Class II farms. The distributions of farms
reporting cotton, cotton acreage, and cotton production by type
of farm for the United States are shown in table 4 for 1949 and
1954. Cotton farms account for a preponderance of farms report-
ing, acres, and production in both years.
Other field-crop farms accounted for a much larger proportion
of the farms growing cotton than any other commercial type
largely because of a concentration of tobacco and peanut farms
in parts of the Carolinas, Georgia, and Alabama, where the growing
of cotton is also prevalent.
Perhaps the single outstanding fact brought out by the distri-
butions in table 4 is that for more than a fourth of the commercial
farms reporting, cotton is not the major source of farm income.
Tliese farms harvested about 16 percent of all cotton acreage,in
1954 and accounted for about 14 percent of total cotton production.
The data in table 3 for economic class of farm reporting cotton
are for all types of farms, while the data by t.vpe shown in table 4_are
Table 3. — Percent Distribution of Farms Reporting Cotton, Acres of Cotton Harvested, and Bales of Cotton Produced, by
Economic Class of Farm, for the United States: 1954 and 1949
All
farms
Commercial farms by
economic
class
Noncommercial farms
Item and year
Total
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
Total
Part-
time
Resi-
dential
Abnor-
mal
Farms reportiiis;
1954
1949
Acres of cotton harvested:
1954
1949.--
Bales of cotton produced:
1954 ..
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
84.8
80.5
96.1
94.1
97,5
96.6
2.5
1.4
23.3
18.9
37.8
28.1
4.8
3.5
16.3
17.2
14.8
18.2
10.0
6.8
16.1
14.9
12.8
14.0
21.7
15.8
19.1
15.9
15.9
14.7
28.0
26.2
15.5
16.3
12.5
14,7
17.8
26.8
6.7
10.9
3.7
7,0
15.2
19.5
3.9
6.9
2,6
3.4
11.1
12.4
3.2
4.4
2.0
2.7
4.1
7.1
0.6
1.6
0.3
0.5
(Z)
(Z)
0.2
0.1-,
0.2
1949 - -- -
0.1
Z 0,05 percent or less.
Table 4. — Percent Distribution of Farms Reporting Cotton, Acres of cotton Harvested, and Bales of Cotton Produced, by
Type of Farm, for the United States: 1954 and 1949
All
farms
Type of commercial farm
Noncommercial farms
Total
Cash-
grain
Cot-
ton
Other
fleld-
crop
Vege-
table
Fruit-
and-
nut
Dairy
Poul-
try
Other
live-
stock
General farms
Miscel-
lane-
ous
Total
Part-
time
Resi-
dential
Item and year
Crop
Live-
stock
Crop
and
live-
stock
Abnor-
mal
Farms reporting:
1964
1949 ...
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
84.8
80.5
96.1
94.1
97.5
96.6
1.7
0.8
2.8
1.0
1.8
0.9
60.9
54.9
79.8
79.9
83.8
86.0
10.0
11.5
3.0
4.0
3.1
3.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
1.5
1,2
1,0
0,8
0,9
0,7
0,8
0.7
0.4
0.3
0-3
0,2
2,5
2.7
2.2
1.9
1.4
1.3
3.6
3.3
3.8
2,8
3,8
2.6
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.1
(Z)
0.1
3.1
4.0
2.6
2,7
1.6
2.0
0.2
0.4
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
1.5.2
19.5
3.9
6.9
2,5
3.4
11, 1
12.4
3.2
4.4
2,0
2,7
4.1
7.1
0.6
1.5
0.3
0.6
(Z)
(Z)
Acres of cotton harvested:
1954
1949
0.2
0. 1
Bales of cotton produced:
1954 .
0.2
1949
0. 1
Z 0.05 percent or less.
10
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
for all commercial farms. For each economic class, cotton farms
account for a preponderance of farms growing the crop, and even
larger proportions of the acreage and production.
Table 5. — Farms Reporting Cotton, Acres of Cotton
Harvested, and Cotton Production for Cotton Farms as a
Percentage of the Total for all Commercial Farms Re-
porting Cotton, for Each Economic Class of Farm, for
the United States: 1954
Economic class of farm
Item
All
classes
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
72
83
86
71
86
86
62
81
85
64
79
81
62
80
84
78
87
91
88
91
Bales harvested
04
THE PICTURE BY REGIONS
Data for the selected regions of this study which show the total
number of farms, the number of farms reporting cotton, acres of
cotton harvested, and bales of cotton produced, by economic class
of farm and by type of farm are particularly useful in indicating
the characteristics of cotton production. They make discernible
a reasonably clear picture of: (/) The nature of the diverse
agricultural economies in which cotton growing is carried on; (S)
the role and relative importance of the cotton enterprise in the
several regions and on different types of farms; (S) the structure,
with respect to size of business, of the cotton-production industry
in the regions.
Information of this kind for economic class of commercial
farms and for types of noncommercial farms is shown in table 6.
The data relating to the number, and proportion, of all farms
reporting cotton indicate the relative importance of cotton
production in the agriculture of the region and show the relative
importance of the enterprise to different size-of-business groups.
In Regions I, II, and III, the three humid regions east of the
Mississippi River, cotton is grown on 74, 64, and 87 percent,
respectively, of all commercial farms. This leaves little doubt
that in these regions it is an extremely important enterprise. An
examination of the proportions of the economic classes of com-
mercial farms that report cotton presents some interesting impli-
cations. For example, in Region II, where 64 percent of all
commercial farms report cotton, only about one-fourth of Eco-
nomic Class I and Class II farms grow cotton, and only slightly
more than one-third of Class III farms report the crop. To a less
pronounced degree the same situation prevails in Region III.
In Region I about the same proportion of Class III farms report
cotton as of all commercial farms. But here too, smaller pro-
portions of Economic Classes I and II farms report cotton than
the proportion of all farms reporting cotton.
It is noteworthy that a larger proportion of the large farms in
these areas do not grow cotton. Particularly for Regions II and
III the general characteristics of the topography, and the effects
of this upon the practicability of adopting labor-saving methods
suggest that many of the larger farms may not find cotton as prof-
itable as other enterprises. In this connection, data of table 7 show
that in Regions I and 11 a large majority of the farms in Classes I
through III that report cotton are not cotton farms. These same
data reveal that in Region III where 89 percent of all commercial
farms that report cotton are cotton farms, a majority of the farms
reporting cotton in Classes I and II are not cotton farms.
A somewhat similar situation with respect to the proportions of
farms in different economic classes that report cotton is found in
Table 6. — Number of Farms, Farms Reporting Cotton, and Acres and Bales of Cotton Harvested, for Commercial Farms, by
Economic Class and for Noncommercial Farms, by Regions: 1954
Region and item
REGION I
All farms, number
Percent distribution
Farms reporting cotton, number.
Percent of all farms
Percent distribution
Acres of cotton harvested
Percent distribution
Bales of cotton harvested
Percent distribution
REGION II
All farms, number
Percent distribution
Farms reporting cotton, number.
Percent of all farms
Percent distribution
Acres of cotton harvested
Percent distribution
Bales of cotton harvested —
Percent distribution
REGION III
All farms, number
Percent distribution
Farms reporting cotton, number.
Percent of all farms
Percent distribution.
Acres of cotton harvested..
Percent distribution.
Bales of cotton harvested
Percent distribution
All farms
223, 910
100 0
135, 573
60.5
100 0
:, 680. 374
100 0
986, 051
100.0
169, 464
100,0
72.282
42.7
100 0
692. 432
100,0
388. 460
100.0
357, 989
100,0
239, 490
66.9
100 0
2, 607, 604
100 0
1, 799. 588
100.0
Commercial farms by economic class
Total.
I
160, 682
1,784
71,8
0,8
118,761
988
73,9
65.4
87.6
0,7
1, 508, 759
109, 668
95,6
6 9
951, 166
73, 797
96.5
7.6
77, 232
1,115
45 6
0.7
49. 708
273
64,4
24,5
68 8
0 4
579. 074
13, 770
83.6
2 0
334, 161
9,171
86.0
2.4
220. 384
1,723
61,6
0,6
192. OSO
963
87,2
66.3
80,2
0 4
2, 324, 630
122, 869
92,7
4 9
1, 693, 480
110, 222
94.1
1 6.1
6,087
2.7
3,898
64,0
2 9
161, 345
10 2
108, 919
11.0
4,349
2,6
1,118
25.7
1.6
30, 966
4.6
19, 313
6.0
6,723
1,6
3,398
69.4
1,4
160. 780
6,0
119, 408
6.6
III
20,608
9,2
15, 404
74,7
11.4
280.983
17 8
195. 394
19.8
7,064
4.2
2,463
34 9
3 4
46, 426
6,7
29, 593
7.6
13, 102
3,7
9,899
75.6
4 1
252, 504
10 1
208. 879
11.6
IV
51.288
22 9
40.640
79 2
30,0
485. 708
30,7
317, 832
32.2
12, 266
7.2
7.127
58 1
9 9
124, 512
18 0
77, 767
20.0
42, 392
11.8
37.882
89.4
16 8
629, 820
25 1
497, 088
27.6
61, 172
22,9
38, 267
74,8
28,2
349, 322
22, 1
196, 938
20.0
26, 174
16 4
19.023
72 7
26 3
228, 017
32,9
131, 663
33.9
83, 965
23,5
76, 866
91.6
32 1
790. 406
31.6
552, 657
30.7
VI
29, 743
13 3
19,664
66.8
14 4
121, 743
7,7
68,276
6.9
26, 264
15,5
19, 704
76 0
27,3
136, 394
19 6
66, 744
17.2
73, 489
20-6
63,092
85.9
26 3
378. 251
15 1
205. 326
11,4
Noncommercial farms
Total
63,228
28 2
16. 812
26.6
12 4
71,615
4,5
34, 895
3.6
92,232
54,4
22, 674
24.5
31.2
113.358
16 4
64,309
14.0
137, 606
38.2
47, 410
34.5
19,8
182, 974
7.2
106, 108
6.9
Part-
time
25, 919
11.6
12, 132
46.8
8 9
60, 087
3,8
30, 025
3.0
31, 968
18,9
17,407
54.5
24.1
98, 914
14.3
49, 124
12.6
52,958
14,7
33,806
63.8
14.1
152,016
6.1
92, 113
5.1
Residen-
tial
37,230
16.6
4,671
12,5
3 6
11, 132
0,7
4,616
0.6
60,179
35 6
5,145
8,5
7.1
14, 215
2.1
6,060
1.4
84,684
23,6
13, 590
16,1
6,7
29,906
12
13. 310
0.7
Abnor-
mal
(Z)
11
(Z)
a
(Z)
2
(Z)
254
(Z)
85
22
26.9
(Z)
5
(Z)
229
)
126
(Z)
63
(Z)
14
22.2
(Z)
1.053
(Z)
685
(Z)
Z 0.05 percent or less.
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION
11
Table 6. — Number of Farms, Farms Reporting Cotton, and Acres and Bales of Cotton Harvested, for Commercial Farms, by
Economic Class and for Noncommercial Farms, by Regions: 1954 — Continued
Region iiiid itom
REGION IV
All farms, number
Percent distribution
Farms reporting cotton, number-
Percent of all farms
Percent distribution
Acres of cotton harvested
Percent distribution
Bales of cotton harvested
Percent distribution
REGION V
All farms, number _
Percent distribution..-
Farms reporting cotton, number.
Percent of all farms
Percent distribution
Acres of cotton harvested
Percent distribution
Bales of cotton harvested
Percent distribution
REGION VI
All farms, number
Percent distribution
Farms reporting cotton, number.
Percent of all farms
Percent distribution .-
Acres of cotton harvested
Percent distribution
Bales of cotton harvested
Percent distribution
REGION VII
,\I1 farms, number
Percent distribution
Farms rei^ortin^ cottim, number-
Percent of all farms
Percent distribution
Acres of cotton harvested
Percent distribution
Bales of cotton harvested
Percent distribution
REGION VIII
All farms, number
Percent distribution
Farms reitorting cotton, number-
Percent of ail farms
Percent distribution ---
Acres of cotton harvested
Percent distribution
Bales of cotton harvested
Percent distribution
REGION IX
All farms, number
Percent distribution
Farms reporting cotton, number.
Percent of all farms. ---
Percent distribution-- -_-
Acres of cotton harvested
Percent distribution
Bales of cotton harvested
Percent distribution -
REGION X
All farms, number
Percent distribution -.-
Farms reporting cotton, number.
Percent of all farms
Percent dislritnition
Acres of cotton liarvosted
Percent disiritiution
Bales of cotton harvested
Percent distribution
TOTAL, 10 REGIONS
All farms, number
Percent distribution _._
Farms reporting cotton, number-
Percent of all farms
Percent distribution
Acres of cotton harvested
Percent distribution
Bales of cotton harvested
Percent distribution
.\11 farms
174. 763
100 0
143. 524
82.1
100.0
3, 197. 922
100 0
2, 747. 257
100.0
150. 257
100 0
47, 102
31.3
100 0
811.339
100 0
333, 306
100.0
33. 054
100 0
10. 517
31.3
100 0
295. 655
100. 0
214.047
100.0
129. 347
100. 0
73. 873
67.1
100. 0
4, 194. 710
100. 0
1, 286. 179
100.0
7,779
100.0
6. 163
79.7
100.0
448.047
100. 0
396, 452
100.0
78. 374
100.0
18. 125
23,2
100.0
2, 286, 967
100.0
1, 404, 491
100.0
67.292
100.0
16. 663
23.3
100.0
1, 615. 866
100.0
2, 619. 438
100.0
1, 392, 819
100. 0
762, 302
64.7
100. 0
17, 530, 905
100. 0
12, 174. 269
100.0
Commercial farms by economic class
Total
145. 977
83 5
135.411
92 8
94 3
3. 145, 532
98.4
2, 717, 741
98.9
57. 109
38 0
31. 651
55.4
67.2
711.278
87.7
307. 236
92.2
19. 589
68.2
9.466
48 3
89.9
282. 096
95 4
201.363
94.1
94,900
73.4
67, 378
71.0
91.2
4, 097, 763
97.7
1, 269, 085
98.7
6,286
80.8
6,747
91.4
93,2
445. 335
99.4
395, 108
99.7
70. 755
90.3
17. 845
26.2
98.5
2, 281. 822
99.8
1, 403. 496
99.9
63. 396
79.3
15. 322
28.7
97. 9
1, 508, 365
99.5
2, 609. 709
99.6
906. 310
66.1
643. 369
71,0
84.4
16. 884, 644
96.3
11,882,625
97.6
4,979
2.8
3,821
76.7
2,7
770, 786
24.1
752, 151
27.4
K2
0,6
374
38,9
0,8
8.5, 359
10 5
62,407
18.7
2.364
7,0
275
11.6
2.6
43. 848
14,8
33, 534
15.7
2,918
2.3
1.868
64.0
2.6
467. 461
10.9
275. 368
21.4
1. 067
13,7
1.027
96,3
16. 7
248. 104
55.4
234. 819
59.2
8,300
10.6
4,878
58.8
26.9
1, 085, 448
47.5
848, 409
60.4
12, 515
18.6
5.997
47.9
38.3
1, 266, 867
83.6
2, 269, 282
86.6
37, 727
2.7
20, 454
54.2
2,7
204. 170
24,0
4, 669, 210
38.3
6,1
7,267
81,7
5,1
449, 761
14 1
399, 604
14.6
3,329
2,2
1,129
33,9
2,4
80, 329
9, 9
40,940
12.3
2.866
8 6
896
31,2
8 5
69. 089
23,4
61, 399
24,0
10, 494
8.1
7,561
72.2
10.2
923. 182
22.0
318.368
24.8
1.493
19.2
1.444
96.8
23 4
110. 190
24.6
97, 876
24.7
18, 864
24.1
6,742
35.7
37.2
796, 839
34,8
437, 073
31.1
12,636
18,8
4.083
33,3
26.1
168, 146
10.4
234, 309
74, 739
5.4
37, 636
60.2
4,9
3, 930. 616
16.7
1, 827, 209
16.0
III
17, 937
10,3
16, 657
92.9
11.6
633.502
16.7
473. 033
17.2
6,019
4 0
2. 775
46,1
6 9
110. 436
13 6
51. 426
15.4
3.398
10,1
2.034
59,9
19 3
77. 120
26 1
66. 835
26.6
18. 764
14.5
14. 540
77.6
19.7
. 126. 042
26.8
313. 137
24.4
1.287
16.6
1,243
90.6
20.2
53. 372
11.9
40,012
10.1
18, 225
23.3
2,922
16,0
16, 1
248, 368
10,9
82, 871
5.9
11.441
17.0
2.630
23.0
16,8
54. 084
3,6
72, 012
2.7
117,845
8.5
70, 667
69.9
9,3
2, 782, 837
16,9
1, 633, 181
12,5
IV
39, 331
22,6
37, 743
96.0
26 3
688, 036
21.5
585, 326
21.3
9,014
6 0
5,465
60,6
11,6
156, 139
19,1
62,344
18.7
4,170
12,4
2. 8.59
68,6
27,2
87, 380
19,4
40,081
18,7
26, 204
20,4
20, 645
78.4
27.8
992, 309
23.7
240, 810
18.7
1.071
13.8
962
89.8
15.6
20, 898
4.7
14, 694
3,7
14. 076
18,0
2,084
14,8
11,5
107, 138
4,7
27, 360
1.9
8.604
12,8
1,660
19.3
10,6
21, 824
1,4
25, 839
1,0
208, 406
15,0
166, 967
75.3
20.6
3, 282, 764
18.7
1, 889, 030
15.5
64.397
31.1
62. 301
96,1
36,4
680, 997
18 2
440,469
16,0
17,083
11,4
10, 305
60,3
21,9
176, 122
21,7
61.831
18.6
3.809
11,3
2.183
57,3
30 8
26. 214
8,9
15, 614
7 3
24,289
18.8
16. 598
68.3
22.6
489. 467
11.7
102. 402
8.0
927
11.9
791
86.3
12.8
10.446
2,3
6.672
1.7
8.462
10,8
1.044
13 4
5.8
40. 954
1,8
7, 013
0.6
6.416
9.5
761
11.7
4.8
6.279
0.4
7,210
0.3
276, 674
19.9
218,119
78.8
28.6
2, 698, 234
16.4
1, 522, 269
12.5
20,445
11.7
17, 622
86.2
12,3
122, 450
3,8
67, 169
2.4
20, 702
13 8
11,603
66,0
24.6
103, 893
12.8
28, 289
8.6
1.210
40,6
11,5
8.445
2.9
3,910
1.8
12,231
9.5
6,206
61.2
8,6
109, 302
2.6
19,010
1.6
441
6.7
280
63.6
4.6
2,325
0.5
1,135
0.3
2,838
3.6
176
6.2
1,0
3.085
0, 1
710
0.1
1,784
2.7
201
11.3
1.3
1.166
0.1
1.067
(Z)
190, 919
13.7
139, 717
73.2
18.3
986, 043
6.6
461, 636
3.7
Noncommercial farms
Total
28, 776
16,6
8,113
28,2
6 7
52, 390
1,7
29, 516
1.0
93, 148
62,0
15, 461
16,6
32 8
100,061
12 2
26, 070
7,8
14.066
41,8
1.061
7,5
10,1
13. 659
4,6
12, 684
6.9
34. 447
26,6
6.495
18.9
8.8
96. 947
2 3
16, 094
1,2
1.493
19.1
416
27.9
0,8
3,712
0.6
1,344
0.3
7, 619
9,7
280
3,7
1.5
6.135
0.2
995
0.1
13, 896
20.6
331
2.7
2.1
7,610
0.5
9.729
0,3
486, 609
34.9
118,943
24.6
1,5.6
646, 261
3.8
291, 744
2.4
Part-
time
11,740
6.7
6,635
66.7
4.6
38, 926
1,2
20, 410
0,7
31, 869
21,2
9,749
30.6
20 7
74, 775
9 2
19, 625
6.9
4.802
14.3
800
16,7
7,6
4.530
1.6
2.076
1.0
16, 659
12.8
5,196
31.4
7.0
85, 895
2.0
14, 212
1.1
693
8.9
386
55.8
6.3
2,607
0.6
1,304
0.3
3,749
4.8
265
6.8
1.4
4,690
0.2
730
0. 1
5,886
8.7
275
4.7
1.8
1,155
0.1
l.OSO
(Z)
186, 131
13.4
86, 541
46.6
11.4
523, 494
3.1
230, 598
1.9
Residen-
tial
17,000
9,7
1,666
9,2
1 1
6,190
0,2
1,611
(Z)
61,265
40 8
6,695
9,3
12 1
23, 870
2,9
6, 455
1.6
9,266
27.5
266
2 8
2 4
706
0 3
280
10,329
0.1
4.8
17,868
20
13.8
(Z)
1,296
3
7.3
15.0
1,8
(Z)
7,878
3.174
0,2
0.1
1,196
687
0.1
(Z)
796
5
10.3
(Z)
30
3.8
0.5
105
(Z)
40
(Z)
3,820
50
4.9
(Z)
20
5
(Z)
10.0
0.1
(Z)
195
360
(Z)
(Z)
15
250
(Z)
(Z)
7,938
73
11.8
0.1
30
26
0.4
36.6
0.2
0.1
30
6,325
(Z)
0.4
30
8.619
(Z)
0.3
99, 936
442
21.5
(Z)
32. 298
10.8
4.2
93, 226
0,6
31, 612
0.3
Z 0.06 percent or less.
12
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
Regions V and VI. The general explanation offered for Regions
II and III would seem to be valid also for Region V. In Region
VI it is probable that the smaller proportion of the larger farms
reporting cotton stems largely from the prevalence of large-scale
rice (cash-grain) farms, for, generally speaking, they do not grow
cotton. The situation for this region is probably similar to that
in Region I, where, in general, the topograpliy facilitates the
adoption of modern mechanized methods. The prevalence in
Region I of farms with large tobacco- and peanut-acreage allot-
ments probably explains the preponderance of noncotton farms
among the larger farms that report cotton, as well as the smaller-
than-average proportions of Class I and Class II farms that report
cotton.
The remaining region of the humid belt, the Alluvial Valley
of the Mississippi and Red Rivers (the "Delta"), Region IV, is one
of the most highly specialized cotton-production regions in the
world. Table 6 shows that 93 jDercent of all commercial farms in
the region report cotton. Table 7 shows that the vast majority
of these farms in all economic classes are cotton farms. The
somewhat smaller proportions — three-fourths and four-fifths
respectively — of Class I and Class II farms that report cotton are
no doubt due to the inclusion within the region of a relatively
small area that has many specialized rice farms.
Region VII comprises most of the subhumid belt of cotton
production. Here 71 percent of all commercial farms report cotton
and, except for Class VI farms, each economic class shows about
or slightly above the all-farm percentage reporting cotton. Fewer
Class VI farms report cotton than the average for all commercial
farms.
Region VIII, the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas, is by far
the smallest in point of area. It ranks with Region IV and the
cotton-growing parts of Regions IX and X, however, as one of the
most highly specialized cotton-producing regions of the country.
More than 90 percent of all commercial farms here grow cotton,
and the percentage of farms in Classes I, II, and III that report
cotton is higher than that for all commercial farms. Table 7
shows that around 90 percent or more of the farms reporting cotton
for each economic class are cotton farms. These facts suggest that
this region has a strong comparative advantage for cotton.
Table 7- — Distribution Between Cotton Farms and Commercial Farms Other Than Cotton Farms, of Farms Reporting,
Acres Harvested, and Production of Cotton on Commercial Farms, by Economic Class of Farm, by Regions: 1954
Region and item
REGION I
Farms reporting cotton harvested:
All commercial farms number-
Cotton farms- percent-
Other commercial farms percent-
Acres of cotton harvested;
All commercial farms acres-
Cotton farms - percent-
Other commercial farms percent-
Bales of cotton prodnced:
All connncrcial farms bales-
Coiliin farms percent.
Other commercial farms percent.
REGION II
Farms reportinp cotton harvested:
All conmiercial farms number.
Cotton farms percent-
Other commercial farms percent-
Acres of cotton harvested;
All commercial farms _ acres-
Cotton farms percent-
Other commercial farms percent-
Bales of cotton produced:
All commercial farms bales.
Cotton farms percent-
Other commercial farms percent.
REGION III
Farms reporting cotton harvested;
All commercial farms - nmnber-
Cotton farms percent-
Other commercial farms percent -
Acres of cotton harvested:
All commercial farms acres.
Cotlon farms \ percent -
Other commercial farms - percent -
Bales of cotton produced;
All commercial farms bales-
Cotton farms _ percent-
Other commercial farms percent -
REGION IV
Farms reporting cotton harvested:
All commercial farms - .-.number-
Cotton farms -.percent-
Other commercial farms.- percent-
Acres of cotton harvested:
All commercial farms acres.
Cotton farms percent-
Other commercial farms percent-
Bales of cotton produced;
All commercial farms bales.
Cotton farms percent-
Other commercial farms percent.
Economic class of farm
All classes
118, 761
48.3
51.7
1, 608, 759
62.7
37.3
951, 166
62.6
37.4
49, 708
81.0
19.0
679, 074
86.3
13.7
334, 161
86.0
14.0
192,080
89.1
10.9
2, 324, 630
92.2
7.8
1, 693, 480
92.8
7.2
136,411
94.6
5.4
3, 145. 532
96.3
4.7
2, 717, 741
95.6
4.5
29.1
70.9
109, 658
68.8
41.2
73, 797
69.7
40.3
273
8.4
91.6
13, 770
36.6
63.4
9,171
37.5
62.5
953
49.8
50.2
122, 869
80.8
19.2
110. 222
83.4
16.6
3,821
78.3
21.7
770, 786
91.6
8.5
752, 161
92.2
7.8
3,898
31.7
68.3
161,345
66.6
43.4
108. 919
.57.0
43.0
1,118
16.1
83.9
30, 966
19. 313
50.4
49.6
3,398
60.:
160, 780
77.6
22.4
119.408
79.6
20.4
7, 267
82.0
18.0
449, 761
91.8
8.2
399, 604
92.8
7.2
III
15, 404
28.6
71.4
280. 983
51.0
48. 4
196, 394
52.2
47.8
2,463
30.3
69.7
46, 426
63.3
36.7
29.693
66.0
36.0
9,899
69.6
30.4
252, 604
86.6
13.5
208, 879
88.0
12.0
16, 657
90.5
9.5
533. 602
96.4
4.6
473, 033
96,2
3.8
IV
40,640
36.6
63.4
486. 708
59.0
41.0
317, 832
59.9
40 1
7,127
67.4
32.6
124, 512
86.9
14.1
77, 767
86.6
13.4
37, 882
86.4
13.6
629, 820
93.3
6.7
497. 088
94.3
6.7
37. 743
94.9
6.1
088, 0.36
97.8
2.2
585, 325
97.7
2.3
38, 267
54.6
45.5
349, 322
72.3
196, 938
73,4
26.6
19, 023
84.3
15.7
228,017
93.0
7.0
131, 663
93.4
6.6
76, 856
90.8
9.2
790, 406
95.5
4.5
552, 657
90.1
3.9
52, 301
97.3
2.7
680. 997
99.3
0.7
440, 469
99.1
0.9
19,564
80.6
19.6
121,743
87.7
12.3
.58. 276
89.7
10.3
19, 704
93.8
6.2
135,394
97.0
3.0
66,744
97.2
2.8
63, 092
94.6
5.6
378, 251
97.1
2.9
20.5. 326
97.6
2.4
17, 622
98.1
1.9
122, 460
98.6
1.4
67. 169
99.2
0.8
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION
13
Table 1 . — Distribution Between Cotton Farms and Commercial Farms Other Than Cotton Farms, of Farms Reporting,
Acres Harvested, and Production of Cotton on Commercial Farms, by Economic Class of Farm, by Regions: 1954 — Continued
Region and item
REQIOX V
Farms reporting cotton harvested:
All commercial farms - number.
Cotton farms percent-
Other commercial farms percent-
Acres of cotton harvested:
All commercial farms acres.
Cottim farms - percent -
Other commercial farms _ _ -.percent -
Bales of cotton produced:
All commercial farms ..bales.
Cotton farms percent.
Other commercial farms percent.
REGION' VI
Farms reporting cotton harvested:
All commercial farms number-
Cotton farms percent-
Other commercial farms _ percent.
.\cres of cotton harvested:
All commercial farms acres.
Cotton farms percent -
Other commercial farms percent.
Bales of cotton produced:
All commercial farms bales.
Cotton farms percent-
Other commercial farms percent.
REOION VII
Farms reporting cotton harvested:
All commercial farms number .
Cotton farms percent -
Other commercial farms percent.
Acres of cotton harvested:
All commercial farms acres.
Cotton farms percent.
Other commercial farms percent.
Bales of cotton produced:
All commercial farms bales-
Cotton farms percent-
Other commercial farms percent.
REGION VIII
Farms reporting cotton harvested:
All commercial farms _ number.
Cotton farms percent.
Other commercial farms percent.
Acres of cotton harvested:
-\11 commercial farms acres.
Cotton farms percent.
0th .T commercial farms.. ..percent-
Bales of cotton produced:
-4.11 commercial farms .bales.
Cotton farms percent -
Other commercial farms percent .
REGIO.V IX
Farms reporting cotton harvested:
All commercial farms number.
Cotton farms percent.
Other commercial farms percent.
Acres of cotton harvested:
.\11 commercial farms acres.
Cotton farms percent.
Other commercial farms percent.
Bales of cotton produced:
All commercial farms bales.
Cotton farms ...percent.
Other commercial farms percent.
REGION X
Farms reporting cotton harvested:
All commercial farms _. .number.
Cotton farms--- - - percent.
Other commercial farms percent-
Acres of cotton harvested:
All commercial farms acreS-
Cotton farms percent-
Other commercial farms - percent.
Bales of cotton produced:
.Ml commercial farms bales-
Cotton farms percent-
Other commercial farms percent-
Economic class of farm
All classes
31. fiSl
70.3
29.7
711,278
80.9
19.1
307, 236
85.5
14.6
9. 4,50
84.5
15.5
2S2. 096
91.4
8.6
201. 363
92.7
7.3
67. 378
66. 7
33.3
4, 097, 763
78.2
21.8
1, 269. 0S5
83.2
16.8
5.747
92.2
445, 335
94. S
5.2
395, 108
95.6
4.4
17, 845
82.1
17.9
2, 281, 822
92.3
7.7
1, 403, 496
93.1
6.9
15.322
77.4
22.0
1, 508. 355
85.0
15.0
2, 609, 709
85.2
14.8
374
.57.0
43. 0
85. 3,59
82.3
17.7
62, 407
86.9
13.1
275
61.1
38.9
33, ,534
.SO. 8
19.2
1,868
63. 9
36. 1
457, 461
77.9
22.1
275, 358
85.0
15.0
1,027
88.9
11.1
248, 104
91.5
5.0
234. S19
94.7
5.3
4,878
86.0
14.0
1,035,448
93.0
7.0
848, 469
93 0
7.0
5.997
75.1
24.9
1, 266. 867
84.7
15.3
2, 269, 282
84.9
15.1
1.129
48.9
.51.1
80.329
72.3
27.7
40, 940
79.3
20.7
895
86.4
13.6
69. 089
94.5
5.5
51. 399
95.4
4.6
7.561
5.8.7
41.3
923. 182
73.8
26.2
318. 368
80.5
19.5
1.444
90.5
9.5
110.190
95.3
4.7
97, 876
96.6
3.4
6,742
86.0
14.0
796, 839
92.9
7.1
437, 073
93.9
6.1
4,083
75.1
24.9
158, 146
86.3
13.7
234, 309
86.8
13.2
III
54.8
45.2
110,436
78.2
21.8
51, 425
84.1
15.9
2.034
87.3
12.7
7.120
95. 6
4.4
56, 825
95.9
4.1
14,540
65.1
34.9
1,126,042
79.5
20.5
313, 137
83.8
16.2
1,243
91.9
8.1
53. 372
95.1
4.9
40,012
97.3
2 922
"so"?
19. 8
248. 3,58
91.8
8.2
82, 871
92.6
7.4
2,630
77.4
22.6
M.084
85. 6
14.4
72,012
87. 2
12.8
IV
5, 465
67.2
32.8
15.5. 139
81.3
18.7
62. 344
8fi. 4
13.0
2.859
83.8
16.2
57. 380
92.2
40. 081
94.2
5.8
20.545
67.2
32.8
992, 309
79.2
20.8
240. 810
82.9
17.1
962
94.7
5.3
20, 898
95.5
4.5
14, 594
96.9
3.1
2. 084
69.0
31.0
107, 13S
84.3
15.7
27, 360
86.3
13.7
1,660
83.7
16.3
21,824
90.9
9.1
25. 829
93.1
10. .305
69.8
.30.2
176. 122
82.7
17.3
61, 831
87.2
12.8
2,183
83.2
16.8
26. 214
90.6
9.4
15.614
93.2
6.8
16, 598
68. 5
31.5
4S9. 467
81.3
18.7
102. 402
85.2
14.8
791
95. 6
4.4
10.446
92.9
7.1
6.672
98.0
2.0
1.044
73.8
26.2
40.951
88.3
11.7
7.013
89.3
10.7
751
90.0
10.0
6.279
8fi.S
13.2
7,210
85.0
15.0
VI
11, 603
78.5
21.5
103, 893
85.7
14.3
28.289
88.7
11.3
1,210
88.0
12.0
8, tl5
91.9
8.1
3.910
94.7
5.3
6,266
74.4
25.6
109. 302
82.0
18.0
19,010
85.8
14.2
280
96. 4
3.6
2.325
97.8
2.2
1,135
96.5
3.S
175
60.0
40.0
3,085
57.5
42.5
710
44.4
65.6
201
94.6
5.5
1,156
77.1
22.9
1,067
76.9
23.1
423019 — 57-
14
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
Region IX contains most of tlie semiarid area of the United
States where cotton is produced. Most of tlie cotton in the region
is found in subregion 102, tlie High Plains cotton area of Texas.
A much smaller proportion of the total for the region is found in
the southerly Texas counties of subregion 103, although in most of
this subregion no cotton is grown. As subregion 103 is consider-
ably larger than subregion 102, the overall figures for the region
with respect to the proportion of farms reporting cotton do not
reflect the intense specialization which characterizes the cotton-
growing part. But it is noteworthy that, although only 25 percent
of all commercial farms of the region report cotton, 59 percent of
Class I farms report the crop and more than 86 percent of these are
cotton farms. In fact, except for Class VI, from 69 to 86 percent
of the farms reporting cotton in each class are cotton farms (see
table 7).
The general situation, with respect to the proportion of all com-
mercial farms that report cotton, in Region X, (which includes
most of the United States total of cotton production under irriga-
tion in an arid climate) is much the same as that just outlined for
Region IX. In large parts of Region X no cotton is grown. Most
of the farms in the region that do not grow cotton are in the large
Central Valley of California which comprises the agriculturally
variegated subregion 116. But subregion 116 is one of the
principal cotton subregions of the country, and Region X, as a
whole, produced about 2.7 million bales of cotton in 1954.
It may be noted (table 6) that about 29 percent of all commercial
farms in Region X reported cotton, and that 48 and 32 percent,
respectively, of Class I and Class II farms reported the crop. It
is also noteworthy that three-fourths or more of all farms reporting
cotton in each economic class are cotton farms (table 7).
DISTRIBUTION OF FARMS, ACREAGE, AND PRODUC-
TION BY ECONOMIC CLASS FOR ALL COMMERCIAL
FARMS
In the preceding section we looked at the proportions of all com-
mercial farms reporting cotton, by economic class, and at some of
the possible implications. In this section we look at the facts,
and their implications, which relate to the distribution of cotton-
growing farms, cotton acreage, and cotton production among the
several economic classes of commercial farms.
Since economic classes of farms represent farms grouped accord-
ing to specified values of production for sale, we may, within
certain limits, draw from data presented by economic class some
inferences regarding the levels of income from farming of families
who operate farms of various economic classes. More detailed
data concerning income for cotton farms by economic class are
found in the last two sections of this report.
In general, the American agriculture sector has participated in
and contributed to economic growth of the country by producing
increasing cjuantities of food and fiber while employing, directly,
a steadily decreasing number of people. There has been a steady
secular decline in the farm population of the United States since
1916. These transfers of labor resources from the farms to the
nonfarm sectors of the economy have taken place mainly because
farm people have moved to nonfarm employment which they
judged to be more attractive than the alternatives available to
them in agriculture.
Gross indications of income levels such as those afforded by
economic classes of farms are to be used with some caution, but
it does appear that from these economic-class data regarding farms
growing cotton some useful inferences can be drawn. They con-
cern: (1) The regions and classes of farms where changes in size
and organization of farms growing cotton would seem most likely,
and (S) the effect that such changes might have upon cotton
production in the country at large and within the several regions.
In this connection it would seem reasonable to regard the farms
in Classes V and VI as a group likely to change. Part of these
represent farms where the operators are in the older age groups
and upon retirement of present operator may be combined to
form large farms. Many of the younger operators on these
classes of farms may seek to increase their Income by farm en-
largement or off-farm employment.
Many factors besides relative income influence the individual
farmer's decisions. Information concerning some of these other
influences will be found later in this report. In particular, the
sections dealing with tenure, labor force, and investment char-
acteristics of cotton farms by economic class of farm are relevant
to this problem. In addition, the nature of government programs
and acreage controls will have a strong bearing on acreage and
production trends. But it is of some interest to consider the
picture for each of the ten selected regions as it is indicated by
(1) the number of farms growing cotton, (2) the acreage of cotton
harvested, and (S) the bales of cotton produced by farms in
Classes I through III and those in Classes V and VI.
The Humid Belt Regions (Regions I to VI)
Table 6 shows that throughout the humid belt (Regions I through
VI) from about one-third to almost three-fifths of all farms report-
ing cotton are found in Classes V and VI. The proportions of
cotton acreage and production that are found on these two
economic classes varies more widely among these regions than
does the percentage of farms reporting cotton. The range, in the
instance of acreage, is from 12 percent in Region VI to more than
50 percent in Region II, while for percentage of production, the
range is from 9 percent in Region VI to 51 percent in Region II.
The most striking concentrations of farms reporting cotton and
of cotton acreage and production in Economic Classes V and VI
are found in Regions II and III — the Piedmont and midsouthern
hilly regions. Around 50 percent of the farms producing cotton
and of cotton acreage and production are accounted for by these
two smallest size-of-business groups of farms.
From an overall standpoint Regions I and V indicate abont
equal degrees of concentration of cotton production on Class V
and VI farms. In each region more than 40 percent of the farms
are found in these classes, while around one-third of the cotton
acreage, and about one-fourth of cotton production is on such
farms.
Region IV, the Mississippi Delta, presents a somewhat different
picture. The proportion of farms reporting cotton that falls in
Classes V and VI (49 percent) is exceeded only in Regions II and
III. In Region IV the approximately 20 percent of cotton acre-
age and production that these farms account for, however, is
smaller than for any other humid region except Region VI.
The Gulf Coast Prairie of Texas and Louisiana, Region VI, is
more similar to the subhumid belt than to the other regions of
the humid belt with respect to the distribution, among economic
classes, of farms growing cotton, cotton acreage, and cotton pro-
duction. About one-third of the farms that grow cotton in this
region fall in Classes V and VI. These farms, however, account
for only 12 and 9 percent, respectively, of regional acreage and
production of cotton.
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION
15
In Regions II and III farms in Economic Classes I to III account
for onl\- 5 and 6 percent, respectively, of farms reporting cotton.
There is more \'ariation between these two regions with respect to
the proportions of cotton acreage and jjroduction that are found
on these three largest size-of-business groups. The proportions
are definitely minor, however, in both instances. In Region II
these farms account for 13 and 15 percent, respectivel.v, of cotton
acreage and production. The comparable percentages for Region
III are 23 and 24.
It will be recalled tliat Regions I and V showed rather similar
distributions for Classes V and VI farms. In the ease of the
three larger economic classes, however, there is more difference
than similarity. In Region I, 15 percent of all farms reporting
cotton fall in Classes I through III, while in Region V only 9
percent are so classified. But in Region V these farms account
for 47 percent of cotton production as compared to 38 percent for
Region I. The proportions of cotton acreage found on these
larger farms are almost the same for the two regions, 35 percent
in Region I, and 34 percent in Region V. The nature of these
distributions suggests that farms in these classes are larger in
Region Y than in Region I, and that in Region V cotton yields
on these classes are larger, relative to yields on farms in other
economic classes, than is the case in Region I.
In Region IV, farms in Classes V and VI accounted for almost
60 percent of all farms growing cotton, but for only about 20 per-
cent of the acreage and production. The relevant distributions for
Economic Classes I through III for this region are almost the re-
verse of this. These larger classes account for only 20 percent of
the farms reporting cotton, but for 55 and 59 percent, respectively,
of the cotton acreage and production of the region.
Region VI has a smaller proportion of its cotton-growing farms,
cotton acreage, and cotton prod\iction in Economic Classes V
and VI than an.v other humid region. It is not surprising that the
proportions of each of these items accounted for bj' Economic
Classes I, II, and III is larger here than in any other humid region.
About one-third of all farms reporting cotton, and roughly two-
thirds of the region's acreage and production of cotton are found
in Economic Classes I through III.
The Subhuniid Belt Regions (Regions VII and VIII)
The two regions that represent cotton production under sub-
humid conditions display distinctly less concentration of farms,
acreage, and production in Classes V and VI than in the regions of
the humid belt. On the other hand, significantly larger propor-
tions of acreage, of production, and of farms growing cotton are
found in Economic Classes I, II, and III.
Regions VII and VIII, the two in the subhumid climatic belt,
do not have much in common in regard to cotton production. The
differentiation is due mostly to the extensive irrigation of cotton
in Region VIII and the virtual absence of irrigation in Region VII.
As there is frequently a shortage of rainfall, at least at the right
time for crop production, in both regions. Region VIII, with its
irrigation, has average yields of cotton more than twice as large as
those in Region VII. In Region VII, about one-third of the farms
reporting cotton and 14 and 9 percent, respectively, of cotton
acreage and production are accounted for by farms in Classes V
and VI. The comparable figures for Region VIII are 17 percent,
3 percent, and 2 percent.
Region VIII has a considerable concentration of farms growing
cotton, and of cotton acreage and production in Economic Classes
I, II, and III farms. Sixty percent of the farms reporting cotton
and more than 90 percent of both cotton acreage and production
are accounted for by farms in these classes.
About one-third of aU farms reporting cotton in Region VII are
found in Classes I, II, and III. These larger size-of-ljusiness classes,
however, account for 60 percent of the region's cotton acreage, and
more than 70 percent of regional cotton production. It is thus
evident that, althougli Region VII has a much larger proportion of
low-total-output commercial farms growing cotton than does
Region VIII, cotton production in both regions is largely concen-
trated on the three largest size-of-business farm groups.
The Semiarid and Arid Cotton Production Regions (Regions IX
and X)
In Regions IX and X the number of farms reporting cotton,
cotton acreage, and cotton production which are accounted for by
Classes V and VI farms are negligible. Farms in Classes I, II, and
III account for four-fifths or more of all farms reporting cotton.
For the arid belt region (Region X) these three classes harvest 98
percent of both cotton acreage and production. The semiarid
Region IX almost matches these figures with 93 and 97 percent,
respectively, of cotton acreage and production found on Class I,
II, and III farms.
COTTON PRODUCTION ON NONCOMMERCIAL FARMS
In the 10 selected cotton-producing regions, noncommercial
farms account for about 16 percent of the farms reporting cotton,
but for only 4 percent of the acreage, and about 2 percent of cotton
production. These farms comprise 35 percent of all Census farms
in the 10 regions. It becomes evident, therefore, that relatively
small proportions of noncommercial farms grow cotton, and that
when they do the acreages are small, and yields are generally less
than average for the region.
There is considerable variation among regions with respect to the
proportion of all farms accounted for by noncommercial farms, and
with respect to the percent of noncommercial farms that grow cot-
ton. In the 6 regions that comprise the humid belt, only in Region
III do as many as a third (34 percent) of the farms grow cotton.
In Regions V and VI only 16 percent and 8 percent, respectively, of
noncommercial farms report cotton. In the remaining three
regions of the humid belt about a fourth of noncommercial farms
grow cotton.
In none of the 4 regions outside the humid belt do as many as
10 percent of noncommercial farms grow the crop.
Only in the Piedmont, Region II, do noncommercial farms
account for as much as 10 percent of regional cotton production;
here they account for 14 percent. Excluding the Delta, where
the}' account for only 1 percent of production, noncommercial
farms account for from 4 to 8 percent of production in the other
regions of the humid belt.
In each region outside the humid belt, noncommercial farms
account for 1 percent or less of total cotton production.
16
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
COTTON PRODl'CTION ON COTTON FARMS AND ON
COMMERCIAL FARMS OTHER THAN COTTON FARMS
In preceding sections we have examined tlie distribution in each
of our regions of farms growing cotton, of cotton acreage, and of
cotton production among economic classes for all commercial
farms, and for noncommercial farms. In this section the exami-
nation relates to similar distributions for cotton farms (those
commercial farms for which sales of cotton and cottonseed account
for 50 percent or more of total farm sales) and for all commercial
farms other than cotton farms. These latter are the residuals
after subtracting for each item the relevant numbers for each
economic class of cotton farm from all commercial farms shown in
table 6. The distributions are shown for cotton farms in table 8,
and for commercial farms other than cotton farms in table 9.
In addition to contributing to our basic general information
about the size of business structure of farms that produce cotton,
Table 8. — Percent Distribution of Number of Farms
AND Acres and Bales of Cotton Harvested, for Cotton
Farms, by Economic Class of Farm, by Regions: 1954
Region and item
All classes
Economic class of farm
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
REGION I
Number of farms
Acres of cotton harvested
Bales of cotton harvested
Number
57, 374
946, 387
695, 510
Per-
cent
0.5
6.8
7.4
Per-
cent
2.1
9.6
10.4
Per-
cent
7. 7
16.3
17.1
Per-
cent
25.9
30.3
32.0
Per-
cent
36.3
26.7
24.3
Per-
cent
27.5
11.3
8.8
REGION 11
.
Number of farms
40, 263
499, 709
287, 513
0.1
1.0
1.2
0.4
3.0
3.4
1.9
5.9
6.7
11.9
21.4
23.4
39.8
42.4
42.7
45 9
Acres of cotton harvested
Bales of cotton harvested
26.3
22.6
REGION III
171, 185
2,144,015
1, 571, 294
0.3
4.6
5.9
1.0
5.5
6.0
4.0
10.2
11.7
19.1
27.4
29.8
40.8
35.2
33.8
34 8
Acres of cotton harvested
B.ales of cotton harvested
17.1
12.8
REGION IV
Number of farms
128,046
2, 997, 248
2, 594, (A2
2.3
23.6
26.7
4.6
13.8
14.3
11.8
17.0
17,5
28.0
22.5
22.1
39.8
19.2
16.8
13 5
Acres of cotton harvested
Bales of cotton harvested
4.0
2.6
REGION V
22, 257
675, 424
262, 820
1.0
12.2
20.6
2.5
10.1
12.3
6.8
15.0
16.6
16.5
21.9
20.5
32.3
25.3
20.5
-10 9
Acres of cotton harvested
Bales of cotton harvested
16.6
9.6
REGION VI
7,995
257, 924
186, 638
2.1
13.4
14.5
9.7
25.3
26.3
22.2
28.6
29.2
30.0
20.5
20.2
22.7
9.2
7.8
13 3
Acres of cotton harvested
Bales of cotton harvested
3.0
2.0
REGION VII
44, 947
3, 206, 187
1,056,045
2.6
11.1
22.2
9.9
21.3
24.3
21.1
27.9
24.8
30.7
24.6
18.9
25,3
12.4
8.3
10 4
Acres of cotton harvested...
Bales of cotton harvested
2.8
1.5
REGION VIII
6,299
422, 103
377, 546
17.2
55.5
68. 9
24.6
24.9
25.0
21.6
12.0
10.3
17.2
4.7
3.8
14,3
2.3
1.7
5 1
Acres of cotton harvested
Bales of cotton harvested
0.6
0.3
REGION IX
Number of farms
14,650
2,105,800
1,305,958
28.6
47.9
CO. 4
39.6
35.2
31.4
16.0
10.8
6.9
9.8
4.3
1.8
5,3
1.7
0.5
0 7
Acres of cotton harvested
Bales of cotton harvested
0.1
(Z)
REGION X
Number of farms
Acres of cotton harvested
Bales of cotton harvested
11,858
1, 282, 203
2, 223, 185
37.9
83.7
86.6
25.9
10.7
9.2
17.2
3.6
2.8
11.7
1.5
1.1
5.7
0.4
0.3
1.6
0.1
(Z)
TOTAL, 10 REGIONS
603. 874
14, 437. 000
10.461,161
3.0
26.3
39.1
5 0
16.8
15.1
9.0
15.8
12.4
22.1
19.0
16.8
35.8
16.7
13.6
Acres of cotton harvested
Bales of cotton harvested
6.4
4. 1
the data in these 2 tables highlight the facts concerning the distri-
bution, for the 10 regions, of farms growing cotton, and of cotton
acreage and production on the 3 largest and the 2 smallest size-of-
business groups for commercial farms.
In general, in the regions of the humid belt (Regions I through
VI) there is a higher concentration of farms, and of acres and pro-
duction of cotton in Classes V and VI on cotton farms than on
other commercial farms that grow cotton.
In Regions VII through X the economic class structure of the
number of farms growing and of the acreage and production of
cotton is dominated by Classes I, II, and III. In these regions
cotton farms show either approximately the same distribution by
economic class as other commercial farms that grow cotton, or
indicate relativeh' higher concentration in Classes I, II, and III.
Table 9. — Percent Distribution of Number of Farms Re-
porting Cotton and Acres and Bales of Cotton Har'
VESTED, FOR COMMERCIAL FaRMS OtHER ThAN CoTTON FaRMS,
BY Economic Class, by Regions: 1954
Z 0.05 percent or less.
Economic class of farm
Region and item
All
classes
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
REGION I
Number of farms
Acres of cotton harvested
Bales of cotton harvested
100.0
100.0
100.0
1.1
8.0
8.4
4.4
12.4
13.2
18.0
24.2
26.2
41.9
36.5
36.8
28.4
17.2
14.7
6.2
2,7
1.7
REGION II
100.0
100.0
100. 0
2.7
11.0
12.3
9.9
20.2
20.5
18.1
21.4
22.3
24.6
22.1
22.3
31.7
20.1
18.6
13.0
Acres of cotton harvested
Bales of cotton harvested
5.2
4.0
REGION III
100.0
100.0
100.0
2.3
13.0
14.9
8.3
18.6
20.0
14.5
18.8
20.6
24.7
23.4
23.1
33.6
20.1
17.6
16.6
Acres of cotton harvested
Bales of cotton harvested
6.1
4.0
REGION IV
Number of farms . _
100.0
100.0
100.0
11.4
43.5
47.6
17.8
23.2
23.2
21.5
16.5
14.5
26.1
11.7
10.7
18.8
6.0
3.6
4.6
Acres of cotton harvested
Bales of cotton harvested _
1.1
0.5
REGION V
100.0
100.0
100.0
1.7
11.1
18.4
6.2
16. 4
19.1
13.4
17.7
18.4
19.1
21.4
IP. 1
32.9
22.5
17.8
26.7
10.9
7.2
REGION VI
100.0
100.0
100.0
7.3
38.6
43.5
8.3
15.7
16.0
17.7
14.0
15.7
31.7
18.9
16.2
25.1
10.1
7.2
9.9
Acres of cotton harvested
Bales of cotton harvested
2.8
1.4
REGION VII
100.0
100,0
100.0
3.0
11.3
19.4
13.9
27.1
29.3
22.6
26.0
23.9
30.0
23.1
19.0
23.3
10.3
7, 1
7.2
2.2
1.3
REGION VIII
100.0
100.0
100.0
26.4
58.4
70.6
30.fi
23.1
19.8
22.6
11. 1
6 2
11.4
4.0
2.5
7.8
3.2
0.7
2.2
Acres of cotton harvested
0.2
0.2
REGION IX
100.0
100.0
100.0
21.4
43.3
61.2
29.6
32.1
27.5
18.1
ll.fi
6.3
20.2
9.6
3.8
8.5
2.7
0.8
2.2
Acres of cotton harvested
0.8
Bales of cotton harvested
0.4
REGION X
100.0
100.0
100.0
43.2
85,7
88.8
29.4
9.6
8.0
17.2
3.4
2.4
7.S
0.9
0.5
2.2
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.1
Bales of cotton harvested.
(Z)
TOTAL, 10 REGIONS
Number of farms
100.0
100.0
100.0
3.9
22.6
41.1
9.0
20.7
17.1
18.1
20.4
16.8
32.4
21.8
16.6
27.1
11.7
8.0
9.5
2.8
Bales of cotton harvested
1.4
Z 0.05 percent or less.
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION
17
SOME IMPLICATIONS OF DISTRIBUTION OF COTTON
PRODUCTION BY ECONOMIC CLASS AND REGION
In the United States, secular trends arc toward increasing size
of farm business and transfer of labor resources from the farm to
iionfarm sectors of the economy. In recent years considerable
emphasis has been placed on solving the low-income problem, in-
volving the acceleration of the process of reduction in numbers of
low-income farms througli farm enlargement and development
and the increase in nonfarm employment. In this context it is
interesting to review the possible implications for cotton acreage
and production of the reduction in numbers of Classes V and VI
farms, and of increases in size of farms. This review covers the
various areas or regions, and is based on current variations in farm
organizations by economic class of farm. The following appear
to be some of the more important implications of a further reduc-
tion in Classes V and VI farms and of increases in size of com-
mercial farms in the 10 cotton regions.
In Region I (Eastern Coastal Plains), 43 percent of all com-
mercial farms that grow cotton and about 30 percent and 26 per-
cent, respectively, of the acreage and production of cotton are
found in Classes V and VI. There is some indication that of the
larger sizes of farms, fewer grow cotton, and that, of those that
continue to grow it, fewer are cotton farms. The indication of
these latter tendencies is not, however, nearly so conclusive in this
as in some other regions.
In light of this, a continuation of the trends toward increasing
size of farm, and a continued reduction in the number of Classes
V and VI farms might result in continued, though probably not a
large, reduction in aggregate cotton acreage in the region. The
extent to which cotton acreage might be affected by a reduction
in the numbers of Classes V and VI farms would seem to depend
to some degree upon the extent to which such farms were used as
part-time units, or combined into larger units. The smaller pro-
portion of noncommercial farms having cotton would suggest a
tendency toward reduction of aggregate cotton acreage on farms
which become part-time units.
In Regions II, III, and V (Southern Piedmont, Eastern and
Western Hilly Regions) where Classes V and VI cotton farms are
numerous and the cotton enterprise is relatively less important
on larger farms, further changes in farm size, and a reduction in
low-income farms would appear likely to encourage more emphasis
on other enterprises and to reduce acreages of cotton. The es-
sential facts upon which these tentative inferences rest are: (/) In
each of these regions the jiroportion of commercial farms that
^row cotton is substantially lower for Classes I through III than
for Classes V and VI. (S) In each of these regions there is con-
siderably more concentration of farms and acreage and production
of cotton in Classes V and VI for cotton farms than for other com-
mercial farms that report cotton. (3) In these regions. Classes
V and VI farms comprise around 50 percent of all farms growing
cotton and they account for approximately 35 to 50 percent of
cotton acreage, and 27 to 50 percent of cotton production. The
concentration in these smallest size-of-business groups is much
larger for cotton farms than for other commercial farms. In these
regions, cotton farms account for from 84 to 97 percent of the acre-
age and production of cotton on Classes V and VI farms.
As an aid to the reader's perspective, it may be pointed out that,
in 1954, these three regions accounted for 42 percent of all farms
reporting cotton in the United States, and for 21 and 20 percent,
respectively, of the national total of cotton acreage and production.
In Regions IV and VI (Delta and Gulf Coastal Regions) the
implications of the data, by economic classes for farms reporting
cotton and the acreage and production of cotton, are considerably
different. In general, there would seem to be little indication
that a reduction in numbers of Classes V and VI farms w-ould signif-
icantly affect cotton acreage in these regions. In each of these
regions substantial proportions of all farms reporting cotton fall
into Classes V and VI (49 percent for Region IV and 32 percent for
Region VI). In this respect there is similarity to Regions II, III,
and V. Another similarity between these regions and Regions II,
III, and V, is that smaller percentages of farms in Classes I and
II report cotton than is the case for the smaller size-of-business
classes. But this condition is less pronounced and is believed
to result mainly from the presence in each of specialized rice
farms. Particularly in Region VI, and to a marked but lesser
degree in Region IV, rice farms do not grow cotton. In both
regions rice farms tend to be concentrated in the larger size-of-
business groups.
Other significant facts about Regions IV and VI that differen-
tiate them from other regions of the humid belt are (1) in both
regions significant proportions (one-fifth for Region IV and about
one-third for Region VI) of farms reporting cotton fall in Classes
1, II, and III, and (2) in Region IV, 55 and 59 percent, respectively,
of regional acreage and production of cotton are found on the three
largest size-of-business groups. The comparable jii-rcentages for
Region VI are 64 and 66 percent.
The geniTal terrain characteristics of these regions would mak(.'
feasible the use of modern mechanical equipment adapted to
larger cotton farms. A continued increase in the size of farms,
given the generally higher yields which characterize larger farms,
may well result in an increase for these regions in their proportion
of the national total acreage and production of cotton.
In 1954, Regions IV and VI accounted for about 19 and 23 per-
cent, respectively, of all acreage and production of cotton in the
United States, and for 18 percent of all farms that grew cotton.
In Region VII (Black Prairie and Plains Regions), it will be
recalled, about 31 percent of all farms reporting cotton are in
Classes V and VI. The.se small size-of-business groups have, how-
ever, only 14 and 9 percent, respectively, of the region's total
acreage and production of cotton. About one-third of all farms
that grow cotton and three-fifths of the region's acreage of cotton
are in the three large size-of-business groups. Classes I through III.
These three groups of farms account for more than 70 percent of
the cotton produced in the region. About as large a proportion
of all farms in Classes I through III report cotton as of those in
smaller size-of-business groups. To these considerations may
be added the fact that about four-fifths of all commercial farms
in Classes I through III that report cotton are cotton farms (which
is about the same percentage as for other classes). Part-time and
residential farms are not as important in the subhuinid region.
In view of these considerations, there does not seem to be any
reason to expect a tendency for cotton acreage to be materially
reduced in the region as a result of increases in size of farms.
Region VII, in 1954, contained about 9 percent of all farms in
the United States that reported cotton, and accounted for 22 and
10 percent, respectively, of the LTnited States total acreage and
production of the crop.
In the three remaining regions, VIII, IX, and X, the production
of cotton is now heavily concentrated in the three largest size-of-
business groups. Effects on cotton acreage or production of re-
duced numbers of Class V and Class VI farms would appear to be
virtually negligible. The general tendency toward increasing size
might work in the direction of increasing emphasis on the cotton
enterprise.
But it should be pointed out that these represent implications
of how- reduction in low-income farms and increased farm size
might tend to influence farm organization and are ba.sed on the
current size structure in these regions. They are not predictions
of trends since many other factors, including governmental pro-
grams, technological developments, and changes in alternati\'es
for use of resources, will affect actual trends.
18
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
Section 2.— TRENDS IN COTTON PRODUCTION BY REGIONS
Historical data concerning the geographic location and the
acreage, yield, and output of cotton, can give \-aIuable insights on
the role cotton plays in the several regions. The picture drawn
by data on trends of the acreage, yield, and production of cotton
for each region shows, in the aggregate, the results of the responses
of thousands of actual and potential growers of cotton to the whole
continuously changing range of economic forces and institutional
arrangements that affect the production of cotton. Figure 5
indicates the aggregate changes in acreage and production of
cotton in the United States during the 75-year period 1879-1954.
regions with which we are dealing (VIII, IX, and X) had far
greater acreages of cotton in cultivation in 1954 than during the
1928-32 period. One additional region, the Mississippi Delta
(Region IV), produced 28 percent more cotton from 29 percent
fewer acres than in 1928-32. Production during 1954 in Regions
VIII, IX, and X was, respectively, 590, 347, and 937 percent of
their average for 1928-32. These four regions, in 1954, accounted
for 39 and 54 percent, respectively, of the United States total of
cotton acreage and production. Comparable percentages for
1928-32 are 17 and 21 percent.
COTTON HARVESTED -ACREAGE, 1879 TO 1954; AND PRODUCTION, 1839 TO 1954; FOR THE UNITED STATES
MILLIONS OF ACRES
20 30
MILLIONS OF BALES
8 12
1954
1949
1944
1939
1934
1929
1924
1919
1909
1899
1669
1879
1869
1859
1849
1839
IHI^B^nB ^^^HBBB ^^^HBBi ^Sa
^^^^^■^^^^B H^^^^^^^^H ^^^^^HI^^^B ^H
■^■Bsn Hi^^^BB inn
^^^^^
^^^^^^
^^
■111 ■■■■■II
""""""""
m^^nmH
^^
U^HDBB
^■^™
»
• NOT AVAILABLE
YIELD PER ACRE 0.69 BALE IN 1954
Figure 5.
Great changes have taken place during the past quarter-
century in the overall picture of cotton production. In the 5-year
period, 1928-32, an average of almost 41.5 million acres of cotton
was in cultivation annually in the United States, whereas for the 5
years, 1950-54, the average acreage in cultivation was only 19.8
million acres — 56 percent of the average acreage 22 years before.
But the production of cotton in the period 1950-54 averaged 96
percent of that for the period 1928-32.
Behind these averages for two widely separated 5-year periods
there is an interesting story of national and interregional adjust-
ments to changing conditions of production and demand for
cotton and for the resources used in its production.
The gist of this story is presented in the data of table 10.
The period 1928-32 represents the last 5 years of cotton produc-
tion in this country prior to initiation of governmental price-
support and acreage-control programs. The change in the acreage
and production of cotton since 1928-32 is the result of widely
varying regional adaptations to the changing conditions of
production and demand.
For example, in 1954, the United States as a whole had in
cultivation, on July 1, only 48 percent of the average cotton acre-
age for that date during the 1928-32 period. Three of the ten
In two of the regions (II and V) there has been a steady decline
in cotton acreage and production since 1928-32. In Region II,
cotton acreage in 1954 was only 24 percent of the regional average
for 1928-32, while in Region V only 17 percent as much acreage
was in cultivation as the average for the earlier period. The
comparable figures for production in 1954 are 29 percent for
Region II and 24 percent for Region V.
In the remaining regions (I, III, VI, and VII), the 1954 acreage
as a percentage of each region's 1928-32 average acreage varies
from 41 to 46 percent. The 1954 production, as a percentage of
the 1928-32 average, ranges from 44 to 79 percent. In Regions I,
III, and VI the range is only from 76 to 79 percent. It is thus
evident that the fourth of these regions, Region VII, merits
special attention in these comparisons, especially in regard to
yields. For example, 1954 yields for Regions I, III, and VI, as
percentages of their own 1928-32 averages, are, respectively, 169,
179, and 154. The comparable figure for Region VII is 108.
The probable reasons for this virtually unchanged yield level since
1928 is that water limits the production in much of this region, and
water is not available in sufficient quantity to permit the effective
use of the commercial fertilizers that have played a major part in
increasing the yields in other nonirrigated regions.
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION
19
Table 10. — Cotton Acreage, Yield per Acre, and Production for Specified 5- Year Periods, for the United States and Regions-
1928 to 1954 '
Item
Averaee 1928-32:
Acres _ _ - _ thousands
Percent otU. S. total percent--
Llnt yield- - ..- pounds
Percent of U. S. average percent.
Production _ 1,000 bales
Percent of U. S. total percent
ATerage 1933-37:
Acres --, thousands
Percent of U. S. total ..percent.
Percent of 1928-32 average percent.
Lint yield ..pounds.
Percent of U. S. average percent
Percent of 1928-32 average percent.
Production... 1,000 bales
Percent of U. S. total. percent.
Percent of 1928-32 average percent
Average 1938-42:
Acres thousands.
Percent of U, S. total percent.
Percent of 1928-32 average percent.
Lint yield pounds..
Percent of U. S. average percent-
Percent of 1928-32 average percent.
Production 1,000 bales.
Pcrcent of U. S. total percent.
Percent of 1928-32 average percent-
Average 1943-47:
Acres .thousands.
Percent of U. S. total percent.
Percent of 1928-32 average - percent- -
Lint yield-. - poiuids--
Percent of U. S. total percent..
Percent of 1928-32 average percent. .
Production - 1,000 bales- -
Percent of U. S. total percent- -
Percent of 1928-32 average percent.-
Average 1948-52:
Acres thousands- -
Percent of U. S. total percent-.
Percent of 1928-32 average percent..
Lint yield pounds. .
Percent of U. S. average percent..
Percent of 1928-32 average percent--
Production 1,000 bales. -
Percent of U. S. total percent. -
Percent of 1 928-32 average percent. .
Average 1950-54:
Acres thousands..
Percent of U. S. total percent..
Percent of 1928-32 average percent..
LinI yield pounds..
Percent of U. S. average percent--
Percent of 1928-32 average percent..
Production 1 ,000 bales. .
Percent of U. S. total .percent..
Percent of 1928-32 average percent-.
1954:
Acres thousands. -
Percent of U. S. total percent..
Percent of 1928-32 average percent..
Lint yield pounds..
Percent of U. S. average percent..
Percent of 1628-32 average percent-.
Production ..1,000 bales..
Percent of V. S. total percent-.
Percent of 1928-32 average percent--
Region
3, 66.';. 6
8.8
180
106
1,374.9
9.4
2, 983. 2
9.3
81
230
120
128
1,428.6
II. 0
104
2, 248. 6
9.3
61
219
92
122
1,025.4
8.6
1, 609. 8
8.1
44
285
111
158
955.2
9.0
69
1,939.1
7.8
53
274
100
152
1,105.7
2,013.5
8.7
65
277
103
154
1,162.9
8.3
85
1.658.7
8.4
45
304
92
169
1,049.1
7.7
76
3.029.3
7.3
210
127
1,361.9
9.3
2, 384. 1
7,4
79
233
121
108
1,159.0
9.0
85
1,746.5
7.2
58
267
113
124
971.5
8.1
71
1,377.3
6.9
45
311
121
144
892.4
8.4
66
1,071.3
4.3
35
270
99
125
603.7
4.2
44
891.4
3.8
29
280
104
130
519.9
3.7
38
741.3
3.7
24
259
78
120
400.2
2.9
29
5, 569. 7
13.4
188
111
2,175.9
14.8
4,173.2
13.0
75
232
121
123
2.018.9
1,5.6
93
3,431.5
14.2
62
203
111
140
1,882.8
15.7
87
3, 054. 2
15.4
55
310
121
165
1,971.6
18.5
91
3,179.6
12.7
57
310
113
165
2, 055. 3
14.4
2.912.3
12.5
52
321
119
171
1,945.5
13.8
89
2, 469. 5
12.5
44
336
101
179
1,728.5
12.6
4, 825. 6
11.6
225
132
2, 263. 7
15.4
4,027.8
12.5
83
280
146
124
2, 349. 3
18.2
104
3, 334. 5
13.8
69
388
164
172
2, 693. 4
22.5
119
3, 272. 6
16.5
68
368
144
164
2, 506. 9
23.6
111
4, 086. 2
16.4
85
366
134
163
3,117.7
21.9
138
3. 845. 6
16.5
80
368
136
164
2. 947. 0
21.0
130
3,414.9
17.3
71
406
122
180
2, 886. 8
21.1
128
4,828.3
11.7
140
82
1,411.3
9.6
3, 410. 5
10. e
141
73
101
1,000.7
7.7
71
2. 303. 6
9.5
48
179
76
128
860.0
7.2
61
1,159.3
6.8
24
189
74
135
456. 0
4.3
32
1,206.8
4.8
25
191
70
136
481.0
3.4
34
974.5
4.2
20
194
72
139
393. 6
2.8
28
833.7
4.2
17
195
59
139
339.4
2.5
24
VI
727.5
1.8
196
115
305. 1
2.1
648.6
2.0
168
87
86
228.1
1.8
75
424.0
1.8
68
200
84
102
178.8
1.6
69
349.3
1.8
48
141.0
1.3
46
410.1
1.6
56
289
105
147
249.2
1.7
416.7
1.8
67
286
106
146
255.8
1.8
84
332.1
1.7
46
302
91
154
232.9
1.7
76
VII
10,903.6
26.3
139
82
3.160.8
21.6
8.070.9
25.1
74
142
74
102
2. 392. 3
18.6
76
6.442.9
22.5
50
162
68
117
1,836.3
16.3
58
4, 805. 1
24.2
44
146
57
106
1.464.4
13.8
46
6. 859. 4
23.5
54
154
56
111
1,878.7
13.2
69
5, ,544. 2
23. S
51
139
61
100
1,601.9
11.4
61
4, 493. 8
22.7
41
160
45
108
1, 406. 1
10.3
44
214.0
0.5
153
90
68.9
0.5
179. 4
0,6
84
101
126
74.3
0.6
108
0.8
92
212
89
139
89.3
0.7
130
2.54. 0
1.3
119
300
117
196
160.7
1.5
234
639.1
2.6
299
321
117
210
417.3
2.9
606
640.6
2.8
299
286
106
187
381.6
2.7
554
474.0
2.4
221
412
124
269
407. 0
3.0
591
IX
1,710.4
4.1
131
77
4&S. 6
3.2
1,621.9
5.0
94
144
75
110
487.3
3.8
104
1,414.5
5.8
82
172
73
131
508. 2
4.2
108
1,231.6
6.2
72
202
79
154
619.6
4.9
111
2. 843. 1
11.4
166
261
96
199
1,647.8
10.9
330
796. 3
12.0
163
282
104
1,644.0
11.7
351
2.446.9
12.4
143
319
96
244
1.027.8
11.9
347
387.0
0.9
325
191
261.7
1.8
680. 3
2-1
176
492
256
151
697.6
6.4
267
703. 0
2.9
1,82
522
220
161
763.9
6.4
292
828.8
4.2
214
570
223
175
984.9
9.3
376
1,828.9
7.3
473
688
215
191
2.241.7
15.7
857
1, 954. 7
8.4
606
6S5
254
211
2. 700. 2
19. ,■<
1,066
1.398.1
7.1
361
842
254
259
2. 453. 3
17.9
937
Total, 10
regions
35, 867. 0
86.6
172
101
12,858.8
87.7
28, 179. 9
87.6
79
196
102
114
11,8.36. 1
91.5
92
21,247.0
87.8
69
206
87
120
10, 808. 6
90.2
84
17,942.0
90.5
60
268
105
156
10,052.6
94. 6
23. 063. 6
92.4
64
285
104
166
13,698.1
90.1
107
21,989.8
94.6
61
289
107
168
13,642.2
97.0
106
18, 263. 0
92.3
61
329
99
191
12. .631. 1
91.6
97
United
States
41.423.0
100.0
170
100
14,667.0
100.0
32.178.0
100.0
78
192
100
113
12,9.33.0
100.0
24,201.0
100.0
58
237
100
139
11,977.0
100. 0
82
19,821.0
100.0
48
256
100
161
10,634.0
100.0
72
24,961.0
100.0
60
274
100
161
14. 2.59. 0
100.0
97
23. 248. 0
100.0
66
270
100
159
14.061.0
100. 0
19.791.0
100.0
48
332
100
195
13, 679. 0
100.0
93
' Source: Agricultural Marketing Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture. -\er{'s represent acres in cultivation July I and yield represents yield per acre In cultivation July 1.
20
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
In spite of these low yields relative to all other regions, cotton
continues as the major crop on most farms in Region VII, and the
region has maintained a relatively stable proportion of the United
States total acreage of cotton from 1928-32 to 1954.
While the data of table 10 gives actual average yields, and
production of cotton along with percentages, for later 5-year
periods, of relevant 1928-32 averages, and of the United States
totals or averages, table 11 presents relative numbers that indi-
cate for each region how that region's changes compare with
changes for the United States as a whole in acreage, yield, and
production of cotton, in comparison with its own past. For
example, under the column headed "Region IV" and opposite the
item "Acres of cotton in cultivation July 1 — 1950-54 average" is
the number 143. This means that for Region IV the 1950-54
acreage of cotton, as a percentage of the average for the period
1928-32, is 143 percent of the United States 1950-54 acreage
expressed as a percentage of the acreage for 1928-32.
In general, the important figures here are those relating to
yield. It will generally be found that, if the relative numbers
for a region are high, that region has maintained or increased
its importance as a cotton-producing region.
Table 11. — Ratio of Change Since 1928-32 in Acreage, Yield, and Production of Cotton in Each Region to Change for the
United States for Specified Periods : 1933 to 1954
(United States Change=100]
Region
Total, 10
regions
United
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
States
Acres of cotton in cultivation, July 1:
104
105
92
88
98
94
113
88
105
94
97
87
118
91
9fi
82
89
82
101
100
94
68
52
50
96
89
95
78
82
62
97
87
92
45
40
31
96
107
115
95
93
92
109
101
109
102
108
92
106
106
126
97
93
85
106
119
142
142
143
148
110
124
109
101
103
92
118
145
154
142
135
138
91
83
50
42
36
35
89
92
89
84
87
71
81
74
44
35
29
26
114
100
100
93
102
96
76
73
67
91
92
79
85
72
64
85
87
82
96
86
92
90
91
85
90
84
70
69
63
55
86
71
64
61
53
47
108
160
248
498
534
460
111
100
130
130
118
138
122
159
325
625
577
C35
121
141
1.50
277
291
298
97
94
102
124
135
125
118
132
154
340
360
373
226
314
446
788
902
752
134
116
110
119
133
133
303
356
522
883
1,110
1,007
101
102
104
107
109
106
101
86
103
103
106
98
105
102
108
110
110
104
100
Average 1938-42
100
Average 1943-47 _ . .
100
Average 1948-52.- .. - -
100
Average 1950-54
100
1954 . . . ---
100
Yield of lint per acre:
100
Average 1938-42
100
100
Average 1948-52
100
100
1954 . -
100
Bales of cotton produced:
Average 1933-37
100
100
Average 1943-47 -
100
Average 1948-52 __ - --.
100
Average 1950-54
100
1954 -
100
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION
Section 3.— TENURE OF COTTON FARMS
21
Detailed analysis of Ihe type of tenure, by which operators
of cotton farms control the land resources they use, and of the
economic implications of such tenure arrangements, is not an
important purpose of this report. But the tenure characteristics
of cotton farms have some effect on the interpretation of data
relating to land use, to production expenses, and to investment on
cotton farms, and the tenure of operator has some influence upon
the mobility of labor and other resources employed on farms.
Therefore, tenure arrangements of the operators of cotton farms
will be briefly examined.
PROPORTION OF COTTON FARMS OPERATED
BY CROPPERS
The legal status of croppers varies from Slate to State. Typical-
ly, the cropper is one who supplies only the labor input for the
farming operation. The landlord tyiiically provides the land and
the power and equipment used, and makes most of the managerial
decisions. Crops produced on cropper operations are usually
divided equally between the cropper and the landlord. The crop-
per usually pays for half the fertilizer used.
Because of these facts the cropper is often treated, in economic
analy.sis, as a farm laborer rather than as a farm operator; but
a farm laborer who shares directly some of the short-term risks
associated with the farm business.
In Census statistics, however, croppers are considered as farm
operators. The principal objective here, in examining the pro-
portions of cotton farms operated by croppers, is to bring out the
facts concerning the influence of cropper operations on (1) land
use, expenses, and investment for various economic classes of
cotton farms, and (.3) the probable mobility of labor and land
resources on various size-of-business groups of cotton farms.
Given the facts concerning the typical cropper operation It
would seem evident that: (1) The land associated with cropper
operations would tend to be very largely cropland, (S) livestock
enterprises would be at a minimum, and (S) to the extent that the
landlord does not operate a farm, or if he does, to the extent that
his farm falls in a different economic class from that of the crop-
per, production expenses and investment in machinery and equip-
ment may be understated in those economic classes where croppers
are found. Also, statistics for the economic class in which the
landlords are found may overstate production expenses, and reflect
investment in machinery and equipment that is not fully related
to the operation with which it is statistically associated.
Because of investments in laud and/or farm machinery and
equipment by farm operators other than croppers, it would seem
reasonable to infer that, with other considerations being equal,
there w-ould be a higher degree of mobility with respect to other
employment opportunities among croppers than among other
types of operators. The relatively rapid decline in numbers of
croppers seems to strengthen such an inference. It follows, also,
that the land resources used by croppers may be more readily
available than those controlled by operators of other tenure
statuses for use in future adjustments which entail increased land
re.sources per farm.
With these facts in mind, it is interesting to examine the data in
table 12 concerning the proportions of farms operated by croppers
for the various economic classes of cotton farms in the 10 desig-
nated production regions.
Table 12. — Percent Distribution of All Commercial Farm Operators, and Cotton Farm Operators in Each Economic Class
OF Farm, by Color and Tenure of Operator, by Regions: 1954
Region and item
Percent distribution
I
.Ml
coni-
niercial
farms
REGION I
All farm operators ..
White
Nonwhite
Owners, part owners, and
managers
White .--
Nonwhite
All tenants except croppers..
White
Nonwhite
Croppers
White
Nonwhite.-.
REGION II
All farm operators
White ,
Nouwtiite
Owners, part owners, and
managers
White ,
Nonwhite
AU tenants except croppers.
White
Nonwhite...
Croppers
White
Nonwhite
100.0
59.8
40.2
51.7
77.6
22.4
26.2
46.5
53.5
22.0
33.8
66.2
100.0
71.3
62.2
89.5
10.5
17.1
54.6
45.4
20.6
30.0
70.0
Cotton farms by economic class of farm
All
classes
100.0
38.8
61.2
38.3
57.6
42.4
32.3
31.2
29.4
22.7
77.3
100.0
48.1
51.9
38.1
72.5
27.5
25.7
44.4
66.6
36.2
25.2
74.8
100.0
98.3
1.7
98.0
2.0
9.8
100.0
1.4
100.0
100.0
100.0
95.7
100.0
4.3
100.0
100.0
92.8
76.3
97.5
2.5
17.5
79.2
20.8
6.2
73.7
26.3
100.0
93.9
6.1
93.9
93.5
6.5
6.1
100.0
III
100.0
58.8
41.2
44.7
81.9
18.1
30.4
49.5
50.6
24.9
28.8
71.2
100.0
81.7
18.3
71.6
92.5
7.5
9.6
76.4
23.6
18.7
42.9
67.1
IV
100.0
41.0
59.0
30.3
70.7
29.3
34.0
34.6
65.4
35.7
21.9
78.1
100. 0
51). 9
49.1
38.2
81.2
18.8
23.3
60.3
49.7
38.5
21.1
78.9
100.0
37.6
62.4
34.6
68.9
41.1
31.6
30.3
69.7
33.8
22.6
77.4
100.0
48.1
51.9
31.0
77.9
22.1
26.3
49.9
50.1
42.7
25.2
74.8
VI
100.0
27.5
72.5
45.0
34.5
65.5
33.7
22.2
77.8
21.3
21.2
100.0
46.6
54.4
42.2
65.0
35.0
26.7
37.8
62.2
31.1
26.0
74.0
Region and item
REGION III
All farm operators
White
Nonwhite..
Owners, part owners, and
managers
White
Nonwhite
AU tenants except croppers..
White
Nonwhite
Croppers
White
Nonwhite - . -
REGION IV
.\11 farm operators
White
Nonwhite
Owners, part owners, and
managers
White
Nonwhite... -
All tenants except croppers. .
White..
Nonwhite
Croppers
White
Nonwhite
Percent distribution
AU
com
mercial
farms
100.0
63.0
37.0
52.6
80.4
19.6
26.0
49.8
50.2
21.4
36.1
63.9
100.0
50.3
49.7
31.4
80.0
20.0
26.7
61.1
38.9
42.9
22.1
77.9
Cotton farms by economic class of farm
AU
classes
100.0
54.0
46.0
42.2
71.6
28.5
30.9
46.6
63.6
26.9
35.2
64.8
100.0
44.0
56.0
25.3
72.9
27.1
26.4
58.0
42.0
48.3
21.3
78.7
100.0
97.9
2. 1
81.7
97.4
2.6
16.8
100.0
1.5
100.0
100.0
8.6
1.4
68.1
98.8
1.2
29.3
98.5
1.5
2.6
93.5
6.5
100.0
91.6
8.4
66.5
91.5
8.5
25.8
95.4
4.6
7.7
80.6
19.6
100.0
93.0
7.0
46.7
93.3
6.7
47.6
94.3
6.7
6.7
81.3
18.7
III
100.0
77.4
22.6
46.0
89.4
10.6
32.7
81.7
18.3
21.3
45.0
55.0
100.0
72.9
27.1
29.3
86.0
14.0
43.6
81.1
18.9
27.1
46.5
64.5
100.0
62.2
37.8
38.9
81.2
18.8
29.5
60.5
39.5
31.6
40.4
59.6
100.0
46.3
53.7
23.8
73.5
26.6
27.4
55.4
44.6
48.7
27.8
■70 O
100.0
53.7
46.3
38.0
75.4
24.6
30.7
47.4
52.6
31.2
33.5
66.5
100.0
30.5
69.6
18.9
66.1
34.9
20.9
39.7
60.3
60.1
16.5
83.5
VI
100.0
46.7
54.3
47.4
60.3
39.7
31.9
32.9
67.1
20.7
32.1
67.9
100.0
27.7
72.3
29.4
54.0
46.0
17.4
34.4
66.6
53.2
11.0
S9.0
423019-
22
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
Table 12. — Percent Distribution of All Commercial Farm Operators, and Cotton Farm Operators in Each Economic Class
OF Farm, by Color and Tenure of Operator, by Regions: 1954 — Continued
Region and item
REGION V
All farm operators
White
Nonwhite
Owners, part owners, and
managers
White
Nonwhite
All tenants except croppers-
White
Nonwhite
Croppers
White
Nonwhite
REGION VI
All farm operators
White
Nonwhite
Owners, part owners, and
managers
White -..,
Nonwhite- _
All tenants except croppers. .
White
Nonwhite
Croppers
White
Nonwhite
REGION VII
All farm operators
White
Nonwhite
Owners, part owners, and
managers
White
Nonwhite
All tenants except croppers...
White
Nonwhite
Croppers
White
Nonwhite
Percent distribution
All
com-
mercial
farms
100.0
80.0
20.0
76.6
87.0
13.0
16.7
66.6
33.4
6.6
34.0
66.0
100. 0
89.7
10.3
63.5
91.8
8.2
32.5
88.9
11.1
4.0
63.9
36.1
100.0
96.9
3.1
65.4
98.3
1.7
29.6
97.3
2.7
6.0
74.9
25.1
Cotton farms by economic class of farm
All
classes
100.0
57.0
43.0
56.1
66.3
33.7
28.4
63.3
46.7
15.5
30.1
69.9
100.0
79.3
20.7
41.7
76.6
23.4
50.2
84.4
15.6
8.1
61.3
38.7
100.0
94.4
5.6
50.9
97.0
3.0
40.0
96.1
3.9
9.1
72.3
27.7
100.0
100.0
100.0
96.2
3.8
75.8
100.0
70.3
95.9
4.1
18.6
100.0
27.9
96.8
3.2
5.6
100.0
1.8
100.0
100.0
97.0
3.0
63.1
100.0
33.9
100.0
100.0
19.8
0.2
70.5
99.8
0.2
28.5
100.0
1.0
100.0
100.0
97.4
2.6
43.6
98.5
1.5
62.5
97.5
2.5
3.9
83.3
16.7
100.0
99.7
0.3
61.7
99.8
0.2
35.9
(19.4
0.6
2.4
100.0
III
100.0
84.7
15.3
57.6
90.0
10.0
29.3
84.3
15.7
13.1
02. 6
37.5
100.0
91.8
8.2
36.6
92.9
7.1
56.0
93.0
7.0
8.4
80.0
20.0
100.0
19.2
0.8
50.7
99.7
0.3
44.8
99.2
0.8
4.5
94.1
5.9
100.0
70.8
29.2
63.1
83.4
16.6
28.3
68.7
31.3
18.7
38.0
62.0
100.0
81.4
18.6
32.8
82.2
17.8
67.8
86.3
13.7
9.4
49.1
60.9
100.0
96.7
3.3
46.9
98.8
1.2
44.1
98.0
2.0
9.0
79.6
20.6
100.0
57.7
42.3
49.5
73.4
26.6
29.8
62.3
47.7
20.6
27.9
72.1
100.0
72 7
27^3
41.9
74.9
25.1
50.1
74.2
25. S
8.0
51.7
48.3
100. 0
92.2
96.1
3.9
38.2
96.3
4.7
13.0
68.2
31.8
VI
100.0
42.9
57.1
61.0
49.0
51.0
27.6
38.8
61.2
11.5
20.5
79.5
100.0
48.8
51.2
67.1
44.1
53.9
24.4
53.8
46.2
8.5
72.2
27.8
100.0
76.6
23.4
62.8
84.6
15.4
29.6
76.1
23.9
17.6
53.7
46.3
Region and item
REGION VIII
All farm operators.
White
Nonwhite..
Owners, part owners,
managers
White
Nonwhite
and
All tenants except croppers..
White
Nonwhite
Croppers
White
Nonwhite.
REGION IX
All farm operators.
White
Nonwhite..
Owners, part owners, and
managers
White --.
Nonwhite
All tenants except croppers..
White
Nonwhite -_.
Croppers
White
Nonwhite.,
REGION X
All farm operators-
White
Nonwhite..
Owners, part owners,
managers
White
Nonwhite
All tenants except croppers..
White
Nonwhite -..
Croppers
White
Nonwhite,
Percent distribution
All
com-
rrercial
farms
100.0
99.6
0.4
81.9
99.8
0.2
17.5
98.6
1.4
0.6
100.0
67.3
99.8
0.2
32.1
99.7
0.3
0.6
97.6
2.4
100.0
96.4
3.6
86.6
96.7
3.3
14.3
94.9
5.1
0.2
100.0
Cotton farms by economic class of farm
All
classes
100.0
99.7
0.3
80.8
99.9
0.1
18.4
99.0
1.0
0.8
100.0
100.0
99.8
0.2
62.9
99.9
0.1
46.3
99.8
0.2
1.8
96.1
3.9
100.0
98.0
2.0
79.6
98.1
1.9
19.5
97.4
2.6
0.9
100.0
100.0
98.9
1.1
85.1
99.4
0.6
14.9
96.3
3.7
100.0
100.0
(Z)
56.2
100.0
42.6
99.9
0.1
1.3
100.0
100.0
99.4
0.6
77.6
99.3
0.7
21.4
99.6
0.5
1.0
100.0
100.0
99.6
0.4
80.9
100.0
18.7
98.0
2.0
0.4
100.0
100.0
99.9
0.1
48.6
100.0
50.0
100.0
L4
93.8
fi.2
100.0
98.2
1.8
75.9
97.9
2.1
23.6
99.3
0.7
0.7
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
16.3
100.0
0.4
100.0
100.0
100.0
54.1
100.0
44.5
100.0
1.5
100.0
100.0
97.8
2.2
81.2
98.8
1.2
18.1
93.2
6.8
0.7
100.0
IV
100.0
100.0
78.0
100.0
20.9
100.0
1.1
100.0
55.4
100.0
42.8
99.2
0.8
1.8
100.0
100.0
96.0
4.0
88.0
96.9
4.1
10.9
96.7
3.3
1.1
100.0
100.0
100.0
76.5
100.0
21.8
100.0
2.6
100.0
100.0
98.1
1.9
67.5
98.9
1.1
35.4
98.2
1.8
7.1
90.9
9.1
100.0
92.6
7.4
85.2
94.8
6.2
13.3
77.8
22.2
1.5
100.0
VI
100.0
100.0
79.6
100.0
20.4
100.0
100.0
95.2
4.8
66.7
92.9
7.1
23.8
100.0
9.5
100.0
100.0
94.7
5.3
6.1
10.5
100.0
2.6
100.0
Z 0.05 percent or less.
It will be observed that, from an overall standpoint, croppers are
an important tenure type only in Regions I through V of the humid
climatic belt. In the most westerly of these, Region V, croppers
account for only 15 percent of all cotton farm operators. In the
other four regions of this climatic belt they account for from 27 to
48 percent of all operators. The most significant fact brought out
is the large percentages of all operators in the three smallest size-
of-business groups that are croppers in Regions I through IV. It
will be recalled that these regions contain a preponderance of all
small size-of-business cotton farms.
Croppers are a relatively unimportant group in the five remain-
ing regions. They do account for about 13 and 18 percent, respec-
tively, of Class V and Class VI farms in Region VII; while in
Region VI they account for from 8 to 9 percent of the two smallest
size-of-business groups of farms.
TENANTS OTHER THAN CROPPERS
The proportions, among various regions, of the large farms that
are operated by tenants other than croppers provide some indica-
tion of the extent to which land for moderate to large size farm
businesses is available, and attractive to persons with limited
capital.
Both relatively and absolutely small proportions of the operators
of Class I and Class II farms in Regions I and II are found in this
tenure category. In Region II a verj' small proportion of Class III
farms are in this tenure group.
At the other extreme, a relatively high proportion of larger farm
business groups are found in this tenure group in Regions IV and
IX (the Mississippi Delta and the High Plains of Texas, respec-
tively). In Region X (the irrigated West) the proportion of tenants
other than croppers is low, but the proportions of Class I and II
farms found in this tenure group are substantially above the
percentage for all farms. In Region VI, a substantial 34 percent of
Class I farms are found in this group, while the percentages of
Classes II and III farms there are larger than those for all farms.
In Regions III, V, and VII the percentages of Classes I and II
farms operated b.y tenants other than croppers are smaller than the
proportion of all farms found in the tenure group. For Region
VIII, there are less than proportional percentages of both Classes
I and III farms in this tenure group.
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION
Section 4.— THE LAND RESOURCE AND ITS UTILIZATION
23
Land accounts for the major part of total investment on all
sizes of cotton farms and, for a given region, the quantity of land
controlled by an operator of a cotton farm is, generally, positively
associated with the level of return to him for his labor and manage-
ment.
The present distribution of the land resource among the eco-
nomic classes of cotton farms for the ten regions is therefore a
useful statistic. Some summary information of this type is given
in table 13.
Table 13. — All Land in Farms, Total Cropland, and
Irrigated Land, by Economic Class of Cotton Farm,
Total of Ten Regions: 1954
Economic class of farm
Item
AU
classes
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
All land in farms million acres..
Percent distribution percent. .
Total cropland million acres. _
Percent distribution.. _ percent. .
Irrigated land million acres..
Percent distribution percent..
62.5
100.0
3S.9
100.0
5.5
100.0
15.4
24.7
10.0
25.7
4.2
75.5
9.4
15.0
6.4
16.5
1.0
18.3
8.9
14.2
6.9
15.1
0.2
4.1
10.9
17.4
7.0
18.0
0.1
1.5
11.2
18.0
6.6
16.6
(Z)
0.5
6.7
10.7
3.1
8.1
(Z)
0.1
Z 0.05 million or less.
DISTRIBUTION OF LAND, BY MAJOR USES
In 1954, there were approximately 62.5 million acres of land in
cotton farms in the 10 regions with which this report is concerned.
In these 10 regions as a whole, a little more than half of this
land (54 percent) was on farms in the three largest size-of-business
groups (Classes I to III). Twenty-nine percent was in farms
with gross sales of less than .$2,500 and the remaining 17 percent
was in farms having sales of $2,500 to $4,999.
Cropland is generally of considerable significance to cotton
farms. The distribution of cropland by economic class of farm,
for our 10 regions in the aggregate, is given in table 13. The
percentage of cropland found on cotton farms in the first 3
economic classes is slightly larger than the proportion of all land;
conversely, the 2 smallest size-of-business groups account for
one-fourth of the cropland and 29 percent of all land.
Table 13 shows also the distribution of irrigated land among
economic classes of farms. In our 10 regions there were 5.5
million acres of irrigated land. This is equivalent to about 14
percent of all cropland on cotton farms. About 98 percent of
this irrigated land was on the three largest size-of-business groups
of farms, and more than three-fourths of it was on farms in
Economic Class I. Many farms have attained a volume of sales
that placed them in the larger size-of-business groups because of
the use of irrigation.
The distribution of land resources among economic classes for
the total of our 10 regions, should be considered along with the
distribution of farm numbers for the same aggregates. Table
8 shows that 61 percent of all cotton farms fall in Classes V and
VI; 17 percent in Classes I, II, and III; and 22 percent in Class IV.
Data on land distribution for all 10 regions as a whole are
useful but, averages for large nonhomogeneous areas niay be
somewhat misleading. There are some striking differences among
the regions with respect to distribution of the land resources
among economic classes of cotton farms. Table 14 gives data
for individual regions on the distribution of land by major-use
classes for each economic class of farm. First, let us examine
the individual regions with respect to the distribution of cropland
among economic classes.
The 4 regions where the highest proportions of cropland are
on farms in Classes V and VI are Regions I, II, III, and V. In
Region I, 39 percent of all the cropland is on Classes V and VI
farms. Comparable percentages for other regions in this group
are: Region II, 69 percent; Region III, 52 percent; and Region
V, 44 percent.
In Region IV ("the Mississippi Delta"), Region VI (the
Texas-Louisiana Gulf Coast Prairie), and Region VII (the Black
Prairie and Rio Grande Plains of Texas and the Rolling Plains
of Texas and Oklahoma) the proportions of total cropland on
Classes V and XI farms are, respectively, 18, 14, and 15 percent.
The 3 remaining regions in which very small proportions of
total cropland are found on the two smallest size-of-business
groups of farms are Region VIII (the lower Rio Grande Valley),
Region IX (the High Plains of Texas), and Region X (the arid
irrigated areas of far western Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and
the San Joaquin Valley of California).
Regions with low percentages of cropland in Classes V and VI
farms have relatively high proportions in Classes I, II, and III.
Similarly those with high percentages on Classes V and VI farms
have low percentages on the larger farms. In Regions I, II, III,
and VI the percentage of total cropland on Classes I through III
farms ranges from 12 to 37 percent, well below the 10-region
average of 57 percent. Regions IV, VI, and VII have, respec-
tively, 63, 65, and 61 percent of their cropland on farms in Classes
I through III. In Regions VIII, IX, and X the proportions of
cropland on the three larger groups of farms range from 92 to
98 percent.
An interesting aspect of the distribution of land by major-use
categories among economic classes for the several regions is the
variation by regions of the proportion that cropland is of total
land in farms. In Regions II, III, and V cropland accounts for
only about 50 percent of all land in farms for most economic
classes. Generally, the proportion rises slightly from Class I
to Class IV; tends to drop for Class V and shows a marked drop
for Class VI. Region I exhibits a similar pattern, but the ratio
of cropland to all land is somewhat higher. In all of these regions
most of the noncropland is accounted for by woodland.
As would be expected, farms in "the Mississipiji Delta," Region
IV, have a higher ratio of cropland to total land in farms than
farms in the 4 regions mentioned above. In Region IV, generally,
cropland accounts for from 70 to 75 percent of all land in farms,
but on Class VI farms the average is about 60 percent. Again,
most noncropland here is woodland.
The general ratio of cropland to all land in Regions VI and
VII is about 62 and 71 percent, respectively. In Region VI,
however, cropland accounts for only a little more than 50 percent
of total land in the 2 smallest size-of-business groups, and in
Region VII cropland is less than 60 percent of all land for Class
VI farms. In these areas noncropland is likcl.v to be open pasture.
24
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
Table 14. — Land Use for Cotton Farms, by Economic Class of Farm, by Regions: 1954
Region and item
REGION I
Land in farms, acres -..
Percen t distribution
Total cropland , acres ._
Percent of land in farms
Percent distribution
Cropland harvested, acres
Percent of total cropland
Percent distribution
Cropland for pasture, acres
Percent distribution
Percent of all cropland
Cropland not harvested and not pastured, acres
Percent distribution
Percent of all cropland
Open permanent pasture, acres
Percent distribution
Woodland pastured, acres
Percent distribution
Woodland not pastured, acres
Percent distribution
Other land, acres
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of all land in farms
Irrigated land in fanns, acres
Percent distri bution
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of total cropland
REGION II
Land in farms, acres
Percent distribution
Total cropland, acres
Percent of land in farms
Percent distribution
Cropland harvested, acre^
Percent of total cropland
Percent distribution
Cropland for pasture, acres
Percent distribution ._
Percent of all cropland.--.
Cropland hot harvested and not pastured, acres.
Percent distribution
Percent of all cropland
Open permanent pasture, acres -
Percent distribution - -
Woodland pastured, acres -
Percent distribution
Woodland not pastured, acres
Percent distribution
Other land, acres
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of all land in farms
Irrigated land in farms, acres
Percent distribution _
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of total cropland
REGION III
Land in farms, acres
Percent d istr ibution
Total cropland, acres
Percent of land in farms
Percent distribution
Cropland harvested, acres _.
Percent of total cropland
Percent distribution
Cropland for pasture, acres
Percent distribution -
Percent of all cropland
Cropland not harvested and not pastured, acres
Percent distribution
Percent of all cropland
Open permanent pasture, acres
Percent distribution
Woodland pastured, acres.
Percent distribution
Woodland not pastured, acres
Percent distribution -
Other land, acres
Percent of farms reporting --
Percent of all land in farms -
Irrigated land in farms, acres
Percent distribution
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of total cropland
Z 0.05 percent or less.
Economic class of farm
All classes
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
6, 044, 937
525, 465
766. 313
891, 348
1, 499, 797
1. 648. 762
814, 262
100.0
8.7
12.7
14.7
24.8
26.6
13.5
3, 521, 137
271, 633
387. 667
522, 912
950, 466
941, 817
446, 642
58.2
51.7
60.7
68.7
63.4
60.8
54.8
100.0
7. 7
11.0
14.8
27.0
26.7
12.7
2, 949, 769
216, 060
310. 801
446,148
828, 672
797,071
361, 027
83.8
79.6
80.2
85.3
87.2
84.6
78.6
100.0
7.3
10.5
15.1
28.1
27.0
11.9
269, 618
32, 315
47, 776
33, 140
62, 418
68,442
26, 627
100,0
12.5
18.4
12.8
24.0
22.5
9.8
7 4
11.9
12.3
6.3
6.6
6.2
6.7
311.750
23,268
29. 090
43, 624
59, 376
86, 304
70,088
100.0
7 5
9.3
14.0
19.0
27.7
22.5
8.9
8.6
7,5
8.3
6.2
9.2
15.7
199,469
31, 967
43. 642
27, 351
41,840
39. 009
16,660
100.0
16,0
21,9
13,7
21.0
19,6
7.8
689, 303
50, 551
88. 634
99, 974
180, 916
168. 912
100, 317
100.0
7.3
12.9
14.5
26.2
24,5
14,6
1, 606, 784
163, 596
230, 792
226,399
295, 172
364. 490
226. 335
100.0
10 9
15.3
15.0
19 6
24,2
15.0
128,244
7,718
14, 578
14, 712
31,404
34,524
26. 308
71.6
92.7
87.0
78.3
69.3
69.7
72.6
2.1
1.5
1.9
1.6
2.1
2.2
3.1
1,937
660
232
870
125
36
15
100.0
34.1
12.0
44.9
6.4
1.8
0.8
0.3
9.8
1.5
1.3
0.3
0.1
(Z)
0,1
0.2
0.1
0.2
(Z)
(Z)
(Z)
3,217,057
49,690
130, 103
222, 242
542, 177
1, 200, 662
1, 072, 183
100.0
1.5
4.0
6.9
16.9
37 4
33.3
1, 609, 357
22,078
68,903
112,628
306, 166
625, 368
484, 214
50.0
44.5
45.3
50.7
56.5
52.1
46.2
100.0
1.4
3.7
7 0
19.0
38.9
30.0
1, 231, 478
15, 716
39, 774
77, 873
241, 665
497, 690
358, 760
76.5
71.0
67 6
69.2
78.9
79.6
74.1
100.0
1.3
3,2
6 3
19.6
40.5
29.1
153,050
4,722
12, 103
20, 307
30, 919
47. 049
37,960
100.0
3.1
7.9
13.3
20.2
30,7
24.8
9.5
21.4
20,5
18,0
10.1
7.5
7.8
224, 829
1,640
7,026
14,448
33, 582
80. 629
87,504
100.0
0.7
3.1
6.4
15.0
36.9
38.9
14.0
7 4
11.9
12.8
11.0
12.9
18,1
233, 169
2,320
16, 685
24,772
37, 982
81. 549
70. 961
100,0
1.0
6.7
10.6
16 3
35 0
30.4
462, 799
10,837
23,013
28,738
68, 165
161. 251
160. 796
100.0
2.4
5, 1
6.3
15.1
35.6
35.6
821, 664
13, 805
30, 164
50,690
114,237
295. 136
317. 622
100 0
1.7
3,7
6 2
13.9
35.9
38.6
100,078
650
2,438
5,414
16, 627
37. 358
38.591
82,4
95.7
98.9
87.1
84.4
81.9
82 0
3.1
1,3
1.9
2.4
2.9
3.1
3,6
230
70
160
30.4
0.2
(Z)
69 6
0.2
(Z)
0 1
(Z)
13, 870, 811
744, 657
930, 129
1. 358, 694
3, 114, 584
4. 561. 951
3, 100. 796
100.0
5.4
6.7
9.8
22.5
32.9
22.8
6, 922, 192
375, 092
463, 713
720, 033
1, 747, 812
2, 285, 530
1, 330, 012
49.9
60.4
49.9
.53.0
66,1
50.1
42.1
100.0
6.4
6.7
10.4
25.2
33.0
19.2
5, 292, 736
270,993
322, 727
530, 856
1. 379. 807
1. 807, 517
980, 836
76.5
72.2
69.6
73.7
78.9
79.1
73.7
100.0
5.1
6.1
10.0
26. 1
34.1
18.5
975, 355
81, 899
100, 825
129,458
231, 472
268, 158
163, 643
100. 0
8.4
10.3
13.3
23.7
27.5
16.8
14.1
21.8
21.7
18.0
13.2
11.7
12.3
054, 101
22, 200
40, 161
69. 719
136, 533
209, 855
185, 633
100.0
3.4
6.1
9.1
20.9
32.1
28.4
0.4
5.9
8.7
8.3
7 8
9.2
14.0
1, 629. 066
95, 679
134, 688
160, 589
321, 445
494, 642
332, 223
100.0
6.3
8.8
9.8
21.0
32.4
21.7
2, 437. 868
111, 666
155, 036
211, 437
440, 446
821,846
697, 437
100.0
4.6
6.3
8.7
18.1
33.7
28.6
2. 395. 308
140, 296
143, 266
224,520
477, 861
756,473
652, 893
100.0
5.8
6.0
9.4
20.0
31.6
27.2
586,377
22,024
33. .527
52, 116
127, 020
203,460
148, 231
77.6
90.3
85.2
82.3
77.6
76.0
78.7
4.2
3.0
3.6
3.8
4.1
4.6
4.7
13. 676
9,283
917
1,191
1.035
1,000
150
100.0
68.4
6.7
8.8
7.6
7.4
1.1
0.2
12,0
1.6
1,1
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.2
2.5
0.2
0.2
0.1
(Z)
(Z)
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION
Table 14. — Land Use for Cotton Farms, by Economic Class of Farm, by Regions; 1954 — Continued
25
R('<;i<)n and item
REGION IV
Land in farms, acres
Percent distribution
Total cropland, acres
Percent of land in farms.
Percent distribution
Cropland harvested, acres
Percent of total cropland
Percent distribution
Cropland for pasture, acres
Percent distribution
Percent of all cropland
Cropland not har^■estcd and not pastured, acres..
Percent distr ibu tion
Percent of all cropland
Open permanent pasture, acres.
Percent distribution
Woodland pastured, acres
Percent distr ibut ion
Woodland not pastured, acres...
Percent distribution
Other land, acres
Percent of farms reporting..
Percent of all land in farms.
Irrigated land in farms, acres. . .
Percent distribution
Percent of farms reporting.
Percent of total cropland...
REGION V
Land in farms, acres
Percent distribution .
Total cropland , acres
Percent of land in farms.
Percent distribution
Cropland harvested, acres ..
Percent of total cropland...
Percent clistrilmtion
Cropland for pasture, acres .
Percent distribution
Percent of all cropland
Cropland not ha'xesied and not pastiu-ed, acres..
Percent distrihutinn
Percent of all cropland
Open permanent pastme, acres.
Pei'cent distriliution.
Woodland pastured, acres
Percent distribution
Woodland not pastured, acres...
Percent distribution
Other land, acres
Percent of farms reporting..
Percent of all land in farms.
Irrigated land in farms, acres...
Percent distribution
Percent of farms reporting.
Percent of total cropland.. .
REGION VI
Land in farms, acres
Percent distribution..
Total cropland, acres
Percent of land in farms.
Percent distribution
Cropland harvested, acres
Percent of total cropland
Percent distribution
Cropland for pasture, acres
Percent distribution
Percent of all cropland
Cropland not harvested and not pastured, acres..
Percent distribution
Pei-cent of all cropland
Open permanent pasture, acres.
Percent distribution..
Woodland pastured, acres
Percent distribution
Woodland not pastured, acres...
Percent distribution
Other land, acres
Percent of farms reporting..
Percent of all land in farms.
Irrigated land in farms, acres...
Percent distribution
Percent ol farms reporting.
Percent of total cropland. ..
Economic class of farm
All classes
9, 662. 737
100.0
B. 984, 120
72.4
100.0
6. 078. 243
87.0
100.0
596. 847
100.0
8.5
310.030
100.0
4.4
403. 098
100.0
822. 460
100.0
I,0tl.47S
mil 0
3HK. f.'.H
61.fi
4.1
189. 326
100.0
2.S
3. 272. 463
100. 0
1. 652. 770
50. 5
100.0
l.lll. 184
67.2
100.0
380. 962
100.0
23 0
160. 624
100. 0
626. 941
ion 0
692. 8 10
100 0
318. loa
100.0
82.449
78.6
2.5
17. 568
100.0
1.1
1.1
9.39, MA
100. (1
585. 819
62.3
100. U
495. 546
84.0
100.0
43. 213
100.0
21.5
47. 060
100.0
8.0
233. 397
100.0
81,919
100.0
17.809
100.0
20.720
2.2
81.6
6.306
100.0
1.5
l.I
2. 973. 423
30.8
2. 088. 189
70,2
29.9
1. 807. 642
86.6
29.7
211.739
35.5
10.1
68.808
22.2
3.3
137, 714
34.2
234, 940
28. 6
385. 614
36.9
120. 966
87.2
4,3
115, 347
60.9
20. 1
5.5
400. 320
12.2
210. 844
52.7
12.8
145. 468
69.0
1.3.1
53, 913
14.2
25. 6
11. 4&3
7 1
5.4
90. 035
17.1
60. 281
8.7
29,304
9.2
9.862
93.5
2.6
12. 395
70.6
30.2
6.9
135. 770
14. 6
83.068
61.2
14.2
65. 0.59
78.3
13.1
8,508
19.7
31.5
9. .501
20.2
11.4
32. 966
14.1
17. 304
21. 1
337
1.9
2,096
1.6
82.1
3.636
57.7
9.5
4.4
1.663.157
16.2
1, 156. 546
73,9
16.6
1.012.384
87.6
16.7
96. 636
16.0
8.3
47. 626
16.3
4.1
54.973
13.6
117. 228
14.3
169. 608
16.2
65. 802
85.2
4.2
29. .897
1.5.8
8.3
2.6
314.996
9.6
173. 662
.55. 1
10.5
120. 497
69.4
10.8
43.228
11.3
24.9
9.927
6.2
.5.7
55. 226
10.5
56. 039
8.1
22. 324
7.0
7.755
87.5
2.5
3, 245
18,5
8.3
1.9
232. 260
24,7
140. 667
60.6
24,0
115.830
82.3
23.4
10.363
24.1
31.7
14. 464
30.7
10.3
59. 559
25.5
19. 234
23,4
10, 266
57,7
2,546
1.1
85.5
400
6.3
0.6
0.3
III
1.541.368
16,0
1. 163. .641
76.6
16.7
1. 036. 655
89.0
17.0
81.900
13.8
7,0
46. 986
14.8
4.0
50.465
12.5
128. 780
15.7
138. 643
13,3
59. 939
67,1
3.9
20. 626
10.9
4.3
1.8
465. 109
14,2
224. 149
48.2
13,6
162,443
72,5
14.6
42, 437
11, 1
18. 9
19, 269
12 0
8,6
87, 853
16. 7
103, 641
1,5.0
41 320
13.0
8. 146
73.8
1.8
5.7
2.3
0.4
240. 712
25.6
161.771
67.2
27.6
141. 197
87,3
28.6
7.149
16.4
20.4
13. 425
28.5
8.3
59. 668
25,6
12. 133
14.8
2, 797
15.7
4.343
1.8
83.1
1.3(»
21.6
2.0
0.8
1. 731, 674
17.9
1. 291. 585
74.6
18.5
1, 139. 706
88.2
18.8
91.089
15.3
7.1
60.790
19,6
4.7
69. 342
17.2
144, 222
17.5
161, 749
16.5
fH.776
50.8
3.7
15. 777
8.4
2.9
1.2
609. 949
18.6
319, 760
62.1
19.3
227, 677
71.2
20,5
64. 397
16,9
20.1
27. 786
17.3
8.7
94.220
17.9
133. ,527
19.3
48. 621
15.3
13. 821
74.6
2.3
865
4,9
1.8
0.3
177, 640
18.9
116, 823
6.6.8
19.9
102. 185
87.5
20,6
8.433
19.4
21.6
6.205
13,2
6.3
40. 044
17,2
13. 468
18.5
1.500
8.4
6,705
3.2
81.2
606
9.6
1.7
0.5
1. 406. 916
14.6
1. 028, 309
73.1
14,7
887. 726
86.3
14.6
80, 513
13.5
7.8
60. 070
19,4
6.8
60. 674
16.0
129. 482
16.7
128. 459
12.3
60, 092
42.6
4.3
6.850
3.6
1.4
0.7
765. .309
23.1
388, 051
61.4
23.5
260. 729
67.2
23.6
87. 328
22.9
22,5
39. 994
24.9
10.3
103. 1.58
19.6
171.412
24.7
72. 369
22,7
20.319
73.2
2.7
30
0.2
0.2
(Z)
109. 742
11.7
60,760
55.4
10.4
62, 830
86.8
10.7
6. 896
13 7
21.5
2. 035
4.3
3.3
29, 610
12,7
13. 195
16.1
2.060
11,5
4,127
.3.8
81.8
305
4.8
1.1
0.5
VI
(7.)
436. 199
4.5
256. 950
58.9
3.7
195. 130
75.9
3.2
34, 970
5.9
13.6
26.860
8.7
10.4
30, 030
7.4
67, 798
8 2
60, 405
5,8
21.016
48.3
4.8
830
0.4
0.8
0.3
726. 774
22.2
336. 314
46,3
20,3
194, 470
.57.8
17.5
89. 6,59
23.6
26.7
62. 186
32,5
15,6
96. 449
18,2
167. 910
24,2
104. .625
32,8
22, 546
84.2
3.1
35
0,2
0,1
43. 640
1,6
22.740
52.1
3 9
18, 445
81,1
3.7
2.866
6.7
14.6
1.430
3 1
6,3
11,550
4,9
6.585
8.1
860
4,8
1,906
4.4
76.5
Z 0. 05 percent or less.
26 FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
Table 14. — Land Use for Cotton Farms, by Economic Class of Farm, by Regions: 1954 — Continued
Region and Horn
REGION VII
Land in farms, acres
Percent distribution
Total cropland, acres
Percent of land in farms.
Percent distribution
Cropland harvested, acres
Percent of ftal cropland
Percent distribution
Cropland for pasture, acres
Percent distribution
Percent of all cropland
Cropland not harvested and not pastured, acres..
Percent distribution
Percent of all cropland
Open permanent pasture, acres-
Percent distribution
Woodland pastured, acres
Percent distribution
Woodland n< t pastured, acres...
Percent distribution
Other land, acres
Percent of farms reporting. .
Percent of all land in farms..
Irrigated land in farms, acres...
Percent distribution
Percent of farms reporting.
Percent of total cropland...
HEGION VIII
Land in farms, acres
Percent distribution
Total cropland, acres
Percent of land in farms.
Percent distribution
Cropland harvested, acres
Percent of total cropland
Percent distribution
Cropland for pasture, acres
Percent distribution
Percent of all cropland
Cropland not harvested and not pastured, acres..
Percent distribution
Percent of all cropland...
Open permanent pasture, acres .
Percent distribution
Woodland pastured, acres
Percent distribution
Woodland not pastured, acres...
Percent distribution
Other land, acres
Percent of farms reporting. .
Percent of all land in farms.
Irrigated land in farms, acres...
Percent distribution..
Percent of farms reporting.
Percent of total cropland...
REGION IX
Land in farms, acres
Percent distribution
Total cropland, acres
Percent of land in fai-ms.
Percent distribution
Cropland harvested, acres
Percent of total cropland
Percent distribution
Cropland for pasture, acres
Percent distribution
Percent of all cropland
Cropland not harvested and not pastured, acres.
Percent distribution
Percent of all cropland
Open permanent pasture, acres.
Percent distribution
Woodland pastured, acres
Percent distribution
Woodland not pastured, acres..
Percent distribution
Other land, acres
Percent of farms reporting, .
Percent of all land in farms.
Economic class of farm
Irrigated land in farms, acres. .
Percent distribution
Percent of farms reporting.
Percent of total crojiland..
11, 276, 398
100.0
7, 957, 946
70.6
100.0
6, 501. 564
81.7
100.0
704, 177
100.0
8.8
752, 205
100.0
9.5
2, 152. 798
100.0
862. 883
100.0
77. 511
100.0
225, 260
81.7
2.0
163, 413
100.0
3.4
1.9
1, 128, 563
100.0
919, 109
81.4
100.0
737, 061
80.2
100.0
52, 588
100.0
5.7
129, 470
100.0
47.6
66, 716
100.0
73. 534
100.0
16, 666
100.0
63, 638
86.8
5.6
484, 807
100.0
52.7
83.1
6, 657, 656
100.0
6, 232, 355
78.6
100.0
4, 742, 138
90.6
100.0
149, 073
100. 0
2.8
341, 144
100.0
6.5
1. 269. 285
100.0
31,368
100.0
7. 346
100.0
117,302
91.2
1.8
1,930.642
100.0
60.6
36.9
1, 314, 335
11.7
916, 960
69.8
11.6
799, 793
87.2
12.3
64, 184
• 9.1
7.0
52, 983
7.0
5.8
255, 419
11.9
109, 527
12.7
7,681
9.9
24, 748
86.6
1.9
83,593
64.6
25.8
9.1
647, 862
57.4
512, 408
79.1
55.8
2, 378, 047
21.1
1, 693, 256
71.2
21.3
1, 396, 242
82.5
21.6
146, 846
20.8
8.7
150, 108
20.0
485. 139
22.5
146. 109
16.9
15, 329
19.8
38, 214
86.6
1.6
47, 673
31.1
13.6
2.8
268, 359
23.8
228. 245
85.1
24.8
421. 789
183, 208
82.3
80.3
57.2
24.9
36, 089
10, 439
69.8
19.8
7.2
4.6
63, 930
34. 598
41.6
26.7
46.4
50.4
39, 465
11, 146
69.7
19.6
60. 839
13, 209
69.1
18.0
10, 336
1.650
66.4
10.0
34, 814
14. 109
90.6
85.2
5.4
6.3
288,300
110, 574
69.5
22.8
56.3
48.4
85.1
80.2
3,201,171
2, 140. 343
48.1
32.1
2, 630, 229
1,780,409
79.0
83.2
48.4
34.0
2, 329, 364
1, 627. 198
92.1
91.4
49.1
34.3
61, 893
46,611
41.6
31.3
2.4
2.6
138, 972
106,600
40.7
31.2
5.5
0.0
612, 664
307, 231
48.3
24.2
7,294
8,245
23.3
26.3
3,556
2,026
48.4
27.6
47,428
42, 433
91.4
92.3
1.5
2.0
1,313,214
553,303
68.0
28.7
90.5
69.6
51.9
31.1
3, 036, 156
26.9
2, 192. 596
72,2
27.6
1, 793, 010
81.8
27.6
197, 555
28.1
9.0
202, 031
26.9
9.2
666, 773
26.3
207, 128
24.0
11,890
15.4
67, 769
85.6
1.9
16, 384
10.0
3.7
0.7
119, C40
10.6
103. 495
86.5
11.3
79, 033
76.3
10.7
4,145
7.8
4.0
20, 317
15.7
61.3
5,375
9.5
2,240
3.0
800
.5.2
7,730
90.3
6.6
63, 270
11.0
51.5
84.1
762, 566
11.6
669, 629
74.7
10.9
497, 770
87.4
10.6
21, 765
14.6
3 8
60. 094
14.7
165, 948
13.1
11,374
36.3
565
7.7
15, 050
91.2
2.0
63, 270
2.8
31.3
9.4
IV
2, 684, 486
23.8
1, 926, 637
71.7
24.2
1, 549, 891
80.5
23.8
171. 288
24.3
8.9
204. 468
27.2
10.6
481, 361
22.4
199, 008
23 1
20, 996
27.1
56. 883
82.7
2.1
3,963
2.6
1.0
0.2
64, 916
4.9
44, 430
80.9
4.8
34,600
77.9
4.7
565
1.1
1.3
9,265
7.2
47.9
705
1.2
5,190
7.1
406
2.6
4,186
84.1
7.6
21, 970
4.6
49.4
86.6
362, 010
6.4
239, 690
66.2
4.6
205, 406
86.7
4.3
12, 484
8.4
5.2
21, 800
6.4
9.1
108, 687
8.6
3,425
10.8
825
11.2
9,383
87.4
2.6
9,080
0.4
15.2
3.8
1, 441. 665
12.8
986. 270
68.4
12.4
781. 639
79.2
12.0
96, 236
13.7
9.8
108, 396
14.4
11.0
267, 860
12.4
138. ,679
16.1
12, 610
16.1
36, 446
78.2
2.5
1,960
1.3
0.7
0.2
29,637
2.6
23,381
79.1
2.5
VI
1,700
0.1
12.3
6.1
421, 710
3.7
243, 227
57.7
3.1
180, 989
74.4
2.8
28. 069
4.0
n.5
34, 169
4.5
14.0
96, 246
4.5
61, 932
7.2
9,105
11.7
11, 200
74.1
2.7
840
0.5
1.0
0.3
8,150
0.7
7,150
87.7
0.8
15. 306
3,115
65.4
43.6
2.1
0.4
455
295
0.9
0.6
6.9
4.1
7,620
3.740
5.9
2.9
41.0
38.9
25
?)
1,951
105
2.7
0.1
2.370
5
15.2
(Z)
1.910
890
79.6
77.8
6.4
10.9
8,683
2,010
1.8
0.4
37.1
28.1
83.6
76.9
171,231
20,335
2.6
0.3
105, 588
6,810
61.7
33.6
2.0
0.1
77, 960
4,450
73.8
65.3
1.6
0.1
5, 966
3,56
4.0
0.2
5.6
5.2
21, 673
2,005
6.4
0.6
20.5
29.4
62, 655
12,200
4.9
0.9
826
205
2.6
0.7
225
150
3.1
2 0
2,038
970
88.2
90.5
1.2
4.8
(Z)
4.8
1.1
Z 0.06 percent or less.
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION
Table 14. — Land Use for Cotton Farms, by Economic Class of Farm, by Regions: 1954 — Continued
27
Region :lnd itonl
KEGIOM X
Land in farms, acres. ,..-
Percent distribution
Total cropland, acres. .-. . -
Percent of land in farms
Percent distribution
Cropland harvested, acres
Percent of total cropland
Percent distribution.
Cropland for pasture, acres
Percent distribution
Percent of all cropland
Cropland not liarvested and not pastured, acres
Percent distribution
Percent of all cropland
Open permanent pasture, acres
Percent distribution...
Woodland pastured, acres..
Percent distribution
Woodland not pastiu'cd, acres
Percent distribution
Other land, acres
Pcrceiit of farms reporting..
Percent of all land in farms
Irrigated land in farms, acres
Percent distribution
Percent of farms reporting..
Percent of total cropland.
Kconoraic class of farm
All classes
6, 433, lie,
lUO.O
3, son. n7fi
.14. R
10(1.0
2, 680, SS.I
76. H
100. 0
174, 062
100.0
a.o
64.";, 639
100. 0
18.4
2, 616, 417
100.0
110, .307
100.0
17, 787
100. 0
282. 629
91.3
4.4
2, 737, 1(10
100,0
99.4
78.1
6, 434, 874
84.5
3,000,211
6.6.2
86. n
2, 310, 230
77.0
86.0
134, 635
77.4
4.5
655, 346
.86. 0
18.5
2, 153, 607
86. 6
5fi. 895
61.6
10. 189
67.3
213. 972
92.0
3,9
2,351,018
85.9
99.6
78.4
066, 100
10.4
34,6,310
61.8
9.8
266, 7.39
74.3
9.6
,30, 694
17.6
8.9
67, 877
9.0
16.8
264, 566
10.5
7, 145
6.4
.3. 518
19.7
4.6. 571
94.1
0.8
266, 878
9.8
99.8
74.3
III
216,811
3.4
108, 799
60.2
3.1
81,886
75.3
3.0
5, 377
3.1
4.9
21, ,536
.3.3
19.8
76, 103
3.0
16, 090
14.6
1,996
11.2
1.3, 81S
94.2
6.4
80, 159
2.9
99.0
73. 7
97, 146
1.6
38, 968
40.2
1.1
28, 022
71.8
1.0
2, 226
1.3
5.7
8,720
1.3
22.4
20, 144
0. S
,30, 171
27.4
2, 0,60
11.6
5, 813
87. 3
6.0
2j, 692
1,1
9S.9
73. 6
16, 370
0.3
11,333
68. 9
0.3
8,418
74.3
0.3
1, 075
0.6
9.5
1,840
0.3
16.2
1, 982
0.1
26
0.2
3,030
86.6
18.5
9,228
0.3
98.5
81.4
VI
(Z)
1,815
(Z)
1,455
80,2
(Z)
(Z)
1,090
74.9
45
(Z)
3.1
320
0.1
22.0
25
(Z)
10
0.1
325
47.4
17.9
1,125
100.0
77.3
Z 0.05 percent or less.
Cotton f;irm,s in Region V'lII liavc, for all economic clas.S'.'S, a
higher ratio of cropland to all land than is found in an.y other
region. The range by economic class is from almost 80 to about
90 percent. The highest percentage of cropUind is found on
Class VI farms. This differs from the pattern observed in the
other seven regions, but appears to be what might logically be
expected of small farms in an irrigated region.
In the High Plains of Texas (Region IX) cropland accounts for
around 80 percent of all land for farms in Classes I, II, and III.
These three cla,sses comprise about 85 percent of all cotton farms
in this region. The ratio of cropland to all land drops to GO per-
cent for Class IV farms, 02 percent for Class V, and 34 percent
for Class VI, Virtually till noncropland is classed as open pasture.
The irrigated cotton farms of the West (Region X) exhibit,
from Classes I through IV^ (about 95 percent of all cotton farms
are encompassed by these economic cl;isse,s), a ratio of cropland to
total land which is about the same as that found in the rougher
wooded regions of the East. The probable explanation here is
that available water for irrigation is the limiting factor in deter-
mining the amount of cropland. In the absence of water for
irrigation most of this land is suitable only for rather extensive
types of utilization. Many of the larger operators probably
controlled large acreages of this land before the advent of irrig.a-
tion. Class VI farms in Region X have an average of more than
80 percent of all land in cropland, and on Cla,ss V farms the per-
centage is about 70.
The data on land use for individual regions show some interest-
ing facts about the distribution of irrigated land. Irrigation is an
influential element on cotton farms only in Regions VIII, IX, and
X. These regions have about 95 percent of the 10-region total
acreage of irrigated land on cotton farms. In Region X, of course,
practically no cotton is or can be grown except under irrigation.
In Regions VIII and IX, on the other hand, this crop is also grown
without irrigation. Since available moisture is the limiting factor
for growing cotton in each of these regions, the yields on non-
irrigated land are only one-fourth to one-half as high as those on
irrigated land.
In Region IX only Class I farms appear, on the average, to
have enough irrigated land to permit all cotton acreage to be
grown under irrigation. For Class II farms in this region it
would appear that irrigated land is available for about 70 [jercent
of the cotton acreage, while on Class III farms the average acreage
of irrigated land is only about 25 percent of the average acres of
cotton harvested. In this region farms in Economic Classes IV
through VI have very little irrigated land.
Apparently, in Region VIII, the extent of irrigated land avail-
able is about equal to cotton acreage harvested on farms in Classes
I through IV, but is somewhat le.ss than cotton acreage for farms
in Classes V and VI. In these two classes a very large proportion
of tlie available cropland seemed to be idle.
LAND VSK AND ENTERPRISE ORGANIZATION
PER FARM
The data available in table 15 permit examination of the use of
the land resource as it is found on typical farms for each economic
class.
Total Acres Per Farm
In all regions farms in Economic Class I have relatively large
acreages of land. In The Lower Rio Grande Valley (Region
VIII) the average land size for Class I farms is smaller than for
any other region. Their average size here is 710 acres. The
highest average land area for this largest size-of-business group is
found in Region II, the Southern Piedmont, where Class I farms
average more than 2,000 acres. After Region II, the largest
average total acreages per Class I farm are found in Regions I,
III, V, VII, and X. In each of these 5 regions the average Class
I farm has well over 1,000 acres of land.
Class I farms in the 3 remaining regions (IV, VI, and IX) have
average total acre-size ranging from about 760 acres in The High
Plains of Texas (Region IX) to around 990 acres in the "Mississippi
Delta" (Region IV).
28
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
The average acre-size of Class II farms is very substantially
smaller in all regions than those of farms in Economic Class I.
The range for the 10 areas is from a little over 700 acres in Region
II to just over 200 acres in Region VIII. It will be recognized
that these are the same regions in which the largest and smallest
average acre-size for Class I farms are found.
In general the average acreage for Class III farms is about one-
third to one-half that for farms in Class II. The range among our
regions for Class III farms is from highs of around 320 acres in
Regions IX and VII to lows of just over 100 acres in Regions lY,
VIII, and X.
With respect to average total acreage jier farm in Economic
Classes IV through VI, three distinct groups of regions are dis-
cernible. In reference to the range among the ten regions in
average acreage size for each of these three economic classes, the
three regional groups may be termed the high group, the low group,
and the medium group.
The high group is composed of Regions V, VII, and IX. Within
this regional group region average acreages for Class IV farms
range from about 165 to about 250. The range for Class V farms
is from just over 100 to about 220 acres, while for Class VI farms
the range of region average acreages per farm is from 80 to about
190 acres. Various combinations of low yields and relatively
large amounts of noneropland result in these relatively large aver-
age acreages for farms in these economic classes in this regional
group.
The regional group having relatively low average acres per
farm for Economic Classes IV through VI is comprised of Regions
IV, VIII, and X. The ranges within this group for regional average
acreage per farm are: From about 50 to 80 acres for farms in
Class IV, from about 25 to 40 acres for Class V farms, and from
10 to 30 acres for farms in Class VI. These relatively low average
acreages per farm are probably the result of both high yields per
acre, and relatively small acreages of noneropland per farm.
The medium group with respect to region-average acre-sizes
of farms in Classes IV through VI is comprised of the remaining
four regions. These are Regions I, II, III, and VI. The ranges
in region-average acres per farm for this regional group are: For
Class IV farms, from about 75 to around 110 acres; for Class V
farms, from 60 to 75 acres; and for Class VI farms, from about 40
to 00 acres.
Table 15. — Land Use on Cotton Farms Per Farm, by Economic Class of Farm, by Regions: 1954
Region and item
REGION I
All farms- number..
All land in farms. .-acres per farm..
Total cropland do
Cropland harvested do
Cropland nsed only for pasture:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Cropland not harvested and not
pastured;
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Open permanent pasture, acres:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of land in farms...
Woodland pastured, acres:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of land In farms
Woodland not pastured, acres:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting.
Percent of land in farms
Average specified crops:
Cotton:
Acres per farm
Percent of cropland harvested . . .
Corn for all purposes;
Acres per farm reporting..
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of cropland harvested..
Tobacco;
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of cropland harvested. .
Peanuts for all purposes:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of cropland harvested . .
AU hay:
Acres— percent of cropland har-
vested
-\cres of specified crops as percent of
cropland harvested
Economic class of farm
AW
classes
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
57, 374
105
287
1,831
1, 234
620
4,399
203
14, 858
101
20, 841
74
15, 755
52
61
51
946
763
314
252
119
101
64
56
45
38
28
22
22
20.3
172
65.5
79
49.3
25
30.3
20
21.4
16
18.3
10
16. 1
22
25.3
186
43.9
67
36.4
37
27.0
20
20.1
17
24.1
16
30.0
29
12.1
3.3
266
41.8
6.1
100
36.4
6.7
33
18.8
3.1
24
11.9
2.8
16
11.6
2.6
11
8.9
1.9
47
25.5
11.4
320
65.1
9.6
138
61.9
11.6
64
35.2
11.2
60
24.3
12.1
34
24.0
10.8
27
23.3
12.3
71
37.1
24.9
670
85.0
31.1
272
68.9
30.2
120
43.0
25.4
61
32.5
19.7
49
3.6.4
23.5
37
38.5
27.8
16
32.1
225
29.8
74
29.4
33
32.5
19
34.6
12
31.7
7
30.4
23
92.7
42.0
183
90.9
22.2
91
93.6
33.9
41
96.0
38.0
26
93.8
43.4
20
92.7
47.3
12
91.0
60.6
2
15.4
0.7
9
19.5
0.2
5
16.9
0.3
4
22.1
0.8
3
20.7
1.0
2
14.9
0.7
1
91
0.6
11
39.8
8.8
79
33.1
3.4
38
60.3
7.6
21
48.6
9.9
13
44.3
10.3
9
41.fi
9.3
6
29.9
7.1
2.6
6.6
3.2
2.4
2.1
2. 1
3.1
86.1
61.2
74.4
83.6
91.3
91.1
91.6
Region and item
REGION n
All farms number-
All land ill farms... acres per farm-
Total cropland do_
Cropland harvested. . do
Cropland used only for pasture:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent, of farms reporting
Cropland not harvested and
not pastured:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Open permanent pasture, acres:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of land in farms
Woodland pastured, acres:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of land in farms -_.
Woodland not pastured, acres:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of land in farms
Average specified crops:
Cotton:
Acres per farm -..
Percent of cropland harvested..
Cora for all purposes:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of cropland harvested . .
Wheat:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of cropland harvested. .
Oats:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting.
Percent of cropland harvested . .
All hay:
Acres—percent of cropland har-
vested
Acres of specified crops as percent of
cropland harvested
Economic class of farm
All
classes
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
40, 263
80
23
2,160
180
723
747
298
4,803
113
16,027
75
18, 483
58
40
31
960
683
327
221
161
104
64
60
39
31
26
19
19
19.6
296
69.6
146
46.1
58
46.6
25
25.3
16
18.9
12
17.4
17
33.6
182
39.1
70
56.6
43
44.7
24
28.9
17
29.8
13
37.5
17
33.9
7.2
211
47.8
4.7
128
67.8
12.0
72
45.9
11.1
23
34.6
7.0
16
33.2
6.8
11
33.6
6.6
28
40.1
14.1
642
87.0
21.8
147
87.2
17.7
64
59 8
12.9
34
41.3
12.6
26
38.6
13.4
22
39.9
15.0
46
43.9
26.5
767
78.3
27.8
226
74.4
23.2
107
63.3
22.8
61
46.2
21.1
46
40.3
24.6
38
46.3
29.6
12
40.6
219
32.0
83
37.5
39
37.8
22
44.3
13
42.6
7
36.6
11
90.3
31.2
118
95.7
16.5
46
89 4
18.3
24
89.0
20.2
14
91.6
25.8
11
90.6
31.5
8
89.7
38.7
6
30.9
6.5
165
39.1
8.9
29
63.9
7.0
17
65.2
9.0
9
42,0
7.1
6
34.4
6.5
4
23.7
6.2
10
27.3
8.8
124
78.3
14.2
62
69.4
19.4
29
65.7
18.0
14
40.4
10.9
8
28.1
7.3
5
21.2
6.0
10.7
15.9
15.6
12.7
10.7
10.0
10.4
97.8
87.6
97.8
97 7
98 8
97.9
96.9
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION
Table 15. — Land Use on Cotton Farms Per Farm, by Economic Class of Farm, by Regions: 1954 — Continued
29
Rogion and itorii
REGION nr
All farms uuraber..
All land in farms. . .acres per farm..
Total cropland -do —
Cropland harvested do
Cropland used only for pasture:
Acres per farm reporting.
Percent of farms reporting
Cropland not harvested and not
pastured;
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Open permanent pasture, acres:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of land in farms _
Woodland pastured, acres:
Acres per farm reporting. _
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of land in farms
Woodland not pastured, acres:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of land in farms
Average specified crops:
Cotton:
Acres per farm
Percent of cropland harvested. .
Com for all purposes:
Acres per farm reporting..
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of cropland harvested, .
Soybeans:
Acres per farm reporting
Percen t of farms reporting
Percent of cropland harvested. _
All hay:
Acres— percent of cropland har-
vested .
Acres of specified crops as percent
of cropland harvested
REGION IV
All farms _._ number..
All land in farms.. acres per farm..
Total cropland do
Cropland harvested. _.._. do
Cropland used only for pasture:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Cropland not harvested and not
pastured:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Open pennanent pasture, acres:
Acres per fann reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of land in farms
Woodland pastmed, acres:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of land in farms
Woodland not pastured, acres:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of laud in farms
Average specified crops:
Cotton:
Acres per farm
Percent of cropland harvested. .
Com for all purposes:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of cropland harvested. .
Oats:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of cropland harvested, _
Soybeans:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of cropland harvested. .
Rice;
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of cropland harvested. .
All hay:
Acres— percent of cropland har-
vested _.
Acres of specified crops as percent of
cropland harvested
Z 0,05 percent or less.
Economic class
of farn
.\11
I
11
III
IV
V
VI
classes
171, 185
81
475
1,668
1.672
656
6,888
197
32, 740
96
69, 768
66
69, 642
63
40
31
790
671
277
193
106
77
53
42
.33
26
22
16
26
22.9
270
63.8
123
49.2
48
39.4
25
27.9
18
21.0
14
19 6
16
24.4
163
28.6
73
33.0
30
29.3
18
22.9
14
22.2
11
27,1
26
34.3
11,0
451
44.6
12.8
192
41.9
14.6
62
36.2
11.1
29
34.3
10.3
21
33,8
10.8
16
34.6
10.6
39
36,7
17.6
624
44,8
15,0
188
49.2
16, 7
80
38.4
16.6
40
33. G
14.1
36
33.9
18.0
29
41.0
22.1
48
29.4
17.3
618
57.1
18.8
206
41,6
15.4
94
34.8
16.6
49
30.0
15.3
39
27.5
16.6
36
30.1
20.7
13
40.6
209
36.6
70
36.2
32
41.1
18
42.6
11
41.8
6
37.4
16
90.7
42.4
14
88.6
18.5
119
90.3
27.4
30
91.7
36,0
19
91.7
42.4
13
90.9
45.8
9
89.7
61.1
16
10.0
4.9
258
49.9
22.6
83
38,2
16.5
25
22,0
7,0
13
14.6
4.4
6
9.0
2.0
3
6.2
L3
7.2
9.0
10,9
9,6
6.7
6.6
6,1
95,0
86.7
91,0
93,7
96.1
96.1
96,0
128, 046
75
2,991
994
5,956
262
15, 075
1(12
35, 824
48
50,913
28
17,287
26
55
47
698
604
194
170
69
36
32
20
17
15
11
25
18,5
140
50.6
40
39,9
18
29,5
14
18,1
13
12.4
14
14,9
20
12,4
92
25.1
42
18.8
22
14,0
14
12,2
12
9.7
10
14,9
27
11,5
4,2
211
21.9
4.6
52
17.6
3.5
24
13,9
3,3
16
12,7
4,0
13
8.9
4.3
16
10,8
6,9
51
12,6
8,6
271
29.0
7.9
105
18.8
7,6
67
14.9
8.4
33
12,1
8,3
26
9.7
9.2
26
16,2
16,6
63
12,9
10,8
305
42.2
13,0
114
24.9
10.9
61
17.9
9.0
36
12,6
9,3
29
8.7
9.1
28
12,3
13,8
23
49,3
236
39,0
69
40,8
34
49.1
19
59,1
11
65.0
7
61.9
12
56,6
14.3
70
72,0
8,4
28
74.8
12.3
15
67.5
15.0
10
60,6
18,6
7
61.1
20.1
6
45.1
24.0
32
6,9
4,6
121
45.2
9.1
37
22,8
6,0
18
11,1
2.9
9
6,4
1.9
7
3.3
1.4
5
3.1
1.6
44
28.0
26.0
229
84.7
32.1
78
81,1
37,2
39
64,0
30,3
19
29,0
17,5
12
16.1
10,8
9
10.3
7.9
83
0.6
0.8
221
6.0
2.2
44
1,0
0,3
42
0,7
0.4
16
0,6
0.3
7
0,1
(Z)
2
(Z)
(Z)
3.7
5.2
4,0
2.8
3.2
2,2
4.0
98,7
96,0
99.6
100.6
100.6
99,5
99,3
Region and item
REGION V
All farms number.
All land in farms acres per farm..
Total cropland...--... do...
Cropland harvested -..--do —
Cropland used only for pasture:
Acres per farm reporting
Perci'iil of farms reporthig -..
Croidand not harvested and not
pastured:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Open permanent pasture, acres:
Acres per farm reportrng. ,
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of land in farms
Woodland pastured, acres;
Acres i>er farm reporting
Perct-nt of farms reporting
Percent of land in farms
Woodland not pastured, acres:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of land in farms
Average specified crops:
Cotton:
Acres per farm
Percen t of crojiland^har vested. . ,
Corn for all purposes;
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of cropland harvested. . .
Oats;
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of cropland harvested. . .
Soybeans for all pmposes; i.- h:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of cropland harvested. . .
All hay;
Acres — percent of cropland har-
vested
Acres of speci^ed crops as percent"of
cropland harvested .
REGION VI
All farms. number.
All land in farms. _. acres per farm..
Total cropland do —
Cropland harvested do
Cropland used only for pasture:
Acre? per [arm ro]>orting
Percent of farms reporting
Cropland not harvested and not
pListured;
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Open permanent pasture, acres:
Acres per farm reporting.
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of land in farms -
Woodland pastured, acres:
Acres per farm reportuig
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of land in farms
Woodland not pastured, acres:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of land in farms
Average specified crops;
Cotton:
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of croidaud harvested. . .
Corn for all purposes;
Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of cropland harvested.. .
Sorghum for all j^nrposes:
Acres per farm reporting..-
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of cropland harvested...
Sweetpotatoes:
Acres per farm reporting.
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of cropland harvested. . -
All hay:
Acres— percent of cropland har-
vested
Acres of specified crops as percent of
cropland harvested -
Economic class of farm
-\I1
cl.isscs
I
ir
III
IV
V
\
22, 267
147
215
1,862
662
571
1,521
306
3,672
166
7,194
105
9,
74
50
981
677
315
218
147
1U7
87
62
64
36
51
33.7
499
50.2
168
49.5
80
34.8
61
34.2
41
30.0
3
28
26.9
176
30.2
66
27.4
47
26.7
35
21.6
25
21.9
3
66
36.2
16.1
826
50.7
22.6
225
44.4
17.5
130
44.6
18.9
74
34.5
15.4
41
34.8
13.7
3
1
70
44.8
21.2
494
56.7
15,1
230
44,2
17,8
163
41.7
22.3
89
41.0
21.9
60
39.9
22.7
5
2
66
21.7
9.7
661
20.9
7,3
186
21,7
7.1
140
19.5
8,9
70
18.8
8.0
55
18.3
9.6
2
1
26
51.8
327
48.3
106
48,2
57
63,2
34
65.4
20
65.8
4
14
81.6
22.1
89
73.6
9.6
36
76,6
12,5
23
79,2
17,1
17
79.0
22,0
12
78,2
26.2
8
3
26
4.2
2.1
130
29.8
6.7
36
26,4
4,2
24
10,3
2,3
13
6,3
1,4
9
2.8
0.7
42
6.9
6.9
184
29.3
8.0
98
36,4
16,4
56
19.0
10.0
24
12,8
6,0
16
4.6
2.0
9.8
17.1
11,2
11.3
8,2
7.6
91.7
88.8
92,6
93.9
92.0
92.3
9
7,996
118
168
808
773
300
1, 776
136
2,397
74
1,816
60
1,
73
62
494
387
182
160
91
80
49
43
33
29
26
21.6
161
31.5
42
31.7
20
20.4
16
21,5
15
21.5
I
24
24.6
120
47.0
46
40.5
21
36.6
12
21.7
8
14.0
1
65
63.2
24.8
320
61.3
24.3
123
62.9
25.7
53
63.6
24.8
32
52.4
22.6
35
46.8
27.0
4
2
76
13.4
8.7
386
26.8
12.7
150
16.6
8.3
91
7.6
5.0
65
10.3
7.6
46
16.7
12.0
2
1
70
3.2
1.9
66
3.6
0.2
684
L9
4.4
42
3.7
1.2
21
2.9
0.8
40
2.8
1.9
32
62.0
206
53.0
84
56.4
41
52,2
22
61.8
13
45.0
4
16
87.8
22.6
46
76.0
8.9
29
89.0
17.1
20
91,3
23.3
13
91.7
28.3
11
84.0
31.8
8
4
21
32.8
11.3
126
67.3
21.8
45
52.4
15.8
16
48.1
9.8
9
29.2
6.4
20.1
5.2
1
6
22.1
1,6
1
15.5
(Z)
"io.'s"
7
21.7
0.8
6
24.9
4.2
4
23.7
4.6
2.
6.0
4.2
4.1
5.0
4.2
8.0
1
92.5
87.9
93.4
91.1
94.9
94.5
9
30 FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
Table 15. — Land Use on Cotton Farms Per Farm, by Economic Class of Farm, by Regions: 1954 — Continued
Economic class uf farm
Economic class
of farm
Rni^icn aBcl item
All
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
All
I
11
III
IV
V
VI
classes
classes
REGION VII
REGION IX
AU farms number- .
44, 947
1.194
4,441
9, 467
13, 812
11, 373
4,660
All farms number
14, 660
4,196
6,797
2,344
1,438
771
106
AU land in farms. ..acres per farm. .
251
1,101
635
321
194
127
90
All land in farms. ..acres per farm..
454
763
369
325
252
222
194
Total cropland do
177
763
381
232
139
87
,52
Total cropland do...
357
603
307
243
167
137
65
Cropland harvested do
145
670
314
189
112
69
39
Cropland harvested do
324
555
281
212
143
101
42
Cropland used only for pasture:
Cropland used only for pasture:
Acres per farm reporting
39
126
70
44
30
25
23
Acres per farm reporting
26
40
20
22
23
26
18
Percent of farms reporting
39.7
42.7
47.4
47.9
41.2
33.4
26.8
Percent of farms reporting. .
39.2
37.2
41.0
43 1
37.7
29 8
19 0
Cropland not harvested and not
Cropland not harvested and not
pastured:
pastm-ed:
Acres per farm reporting
45
133
79
51
39
28
26
Acres per farm reportmg
68
89
.58
63
48
74
50
Percent of farms reporting
37.4
33.3
42.8
41.6
38.3
34.6
29.2
Percent of farms reportmg
34.0
37.2
31.8
33.8
31.8
37.9
38.1
Open permanent pasture, acres:
Open permanent pasture, acres:
Acres per farm reporting
91
535
213
104
66
45
44
Acres per farm reporting.. .
183
306
125
142
136
160
152
Percent of farms reporting
52.4
39.9
.51.2
67.4
62.9
61.8
46.5
Percent of farms reporting. _ . .
47.3
47.7
42,4
49.7
66. 1
64.0
76.2
Percent of land in farms
19.1
19.4
20.4
18.7
17.9
18.6
22.8
Percent of land in farms
19.1
19.1
14,4
21.8
30.0
36.5
60.0
Woodland pastured, acres:
Woodland pastured, acres:
100
616
214
129
77
67
52
.4cres per farm reporting
130
228
113
140
110
55
20
Percent of farms reporting
19.3
14.9
15.4
16.9
18.8
21.2
25.4
Percent of farms reporting. . .
1.7
0.8
1.3
3 6
2 2
1 9
9 5
Percent of land in farms
7.7
8.3
6.1
6.8
7.4
9.6
14.7
Percent of land in farms
0.5
0.2
0.4
1.6
0.9
0.5
1.0
Woodland not pastured, acres:
Woodland not pastured, acres:
Acres per farm reporting
43
154
79
31
37
31
40
Acres per farm reporting .
74
102
72
94
82
15
30
Percerit of farms reporting
4.1
4.2
4.4
4.1
4.1
3.6
4.8
Percent of farms reportmg
0.7
0.8
0.6
0.3
0.7
1.9
4 8
Percent of land in farms
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.8
0.9
2.2
Percent of land in farms
0.1
0.1
0, 1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.7
Average specified crops:
Cotton:
Average specified crops:
Cotton:
Acres per farm reporting .
Percent of cropland harvested. -
Acres per farm..
71
299
153
96
57
35
19
144
44.4
241
43.3
128
46.6
97
45.8
63
44.0
47
46.4
17
39.9
Percent of cropland harvested. . .
49.3
44.6
48.8
49.9
50.7
50.9
49.6
Sorghum :
Sorghum for all purposes:
Acres per farm reporting
57
296
112
62
37
24
14
Acres per farm reporting
164
270
143
107
76
56
32
Percent of farms reporting. .
64.9
87.7
81.1
76.6
64.7
55.9
44.1
Percent of farms reporting
96.3
97.8
97.2
95.9
89.4
81.7
67.1
Percent of cropland harvested.- -
25.7
38.8
28.8
24.7
21.6
19.4
16.0
Percent of cropland harvested.
48.3
47.6
49. 6
48.1
46.8
4,5.7
43.8
Corn for all purposes:
Wheat:
Acres per farm reporting ._
26
60
44
37
26
18
12
.\cres per farm reportmg
86
132
66
68
60
31
36
Percent of farms reporting
53.1
26.6
33.9
44.3
66.5
62.8
66.3
Percent of farms reporting. . . .
17.6
2.5.3
14.7
14.8
16.0
11.0
14.3
Percent of cropland harvested..
9.2
2.4
4.7
8.7
12.2
16.6
20.6
Percent of cropland harvested..
4.7
6.0
2.9
4.0
6.3
3.4
12.1
Small grams:
,\11 hay:
Percent of cropland harvested..
6.1
7.1
7.9
6.4
6.4
3.4
2.7
Acres — percent of cropland bar-
0.8
0,9
0.6
0.8
1.3
1,1
3 8
All hay:
Acres— percent of cropland har-
Acres of specified crops as percent of
3!
3.0
4.2
4.4
5.2
6.4
cropland harvested
98,1
97.8
98.6
98.7
97.3
96,6
99.7
Acres of specified crops as percent of
REGION X
cropland harvested
94.4
95.9
93.8
93 8
All farms number. -
All land in farms., acres per farm. -
11,868
643
4,602
1,207
3,066
217
2,036
107
1,389
70
676
24
190
10
REGION VIII
All farms number. .
5,299
913
1,307
1.142
911
756
270
Total crophnid do...
296
666
113
63
28
17
8
All land in farms. ..acres per farm.-
213
710
206
105
60
39
30
Criiplaiul harvested do
227
513
84
40
20
12
6
Total cropland do
173
661
175
91
49
31
26
Cropland used only for pasture:
Acres per farm reportmg
61
114
36
12
9
13
3
Cropland harvested.. do
139
402
140
69
38
20
12
Percent of farms reporting. ..
24.2
20.3
28.7
22.2
18. 5
12.6
7.9
Cropland used only tor pasture:
Cropland not harvested and not
Acres per farm reporting.
49
141
31
14
8
6
10
pastured:
Percent of farm reporting
20.2
28.6
26.0
26.9
8.2
9.3
11.1
Acres per farm reporting
138
257
50
31
20
11
9
Cropland not harvested and not
pastured ■
Percent of farms reporting
39.4
48.0
37.9
34.3
31.8
2,5.9
18.4
Acres per farm reporting
51
127
53
35
21
26
36
Percent of farms reporting
47.6
46.4
60.4
51.3
47.9
41.0
38.9
Acres per farm reporting
1,292
2,439
496
258
106
64
2
Open permanent pasture, acres:
Percent of farms reporting
16.4
19.6
17.4
14.6
13.7
4.6
7.9
Percent of land in farms. .
39.1
39.6
39.7
35. 1
20.7
12.1
1.4
Acres per farm reporting
140
362
100
41
14
Percent of farms reporting
7.7
11.9
8.5
11 5
5 5
0 7
Woodland pastmed, acres:
Percent of land in farms
5.0
6.1
4.2
4.5
1.3
829
1,211
149
671
2, 165
1.0
31.1
Percent (jf farms reportmg
I.l
1.7
1.0
1.0
1.6
1.1
1.2
7.4
Woodland pastured, acres:
Acres per farm reporting
318
1,182
166
37
247
122
21
Woodland not pastured, acres:
Percent of farms reportmg
4.4
4.7
6.5
6.3
2.3
2.1
1.9
Acres per farm reportUig-
95
170
76
60
08
6
2
Percent of land in farms
6.6
7.8
4.9
1.9
9.6
6.6
1.3
Percent of farms reporting. . . .
1.6
1.3
1.6
2.0
2.2
0.7
2.6
Woodland not pastured, acres:
Percent of land in farms.
0.3
0.2
0.6
0.9
2.1
0.2
0.6
Acres per farm reporting
177
369
82
53
40
237
1
Percent of farms reporting
1.7
3.1
1.5
1.3
1. 1
1.3
1.9
Cotton-
Percent of land in farms
1.4
1.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
8.0
0.1
Acres per farm
108
238
45
23
14
8
6
Average specified crops;
Percent of cropland harvested-.
47.7
40.6
63.2
66. 6
70.8
04.7
81.7
Cotton:
Sorghum for all purposes:
80
67.3
257
65.6
80
67.3
44
64.2
22
67.7
13
63.4
8
73.0
.Acres per farm reporting
Percent of farms reportmg
65
23.9
100
33,6
28
26,6
22
15.9
11
8.0
17
8.3
6
6.3
Percent of cropland harvested..
Com for all purposes:
Percent of cropland harvested...
6.8
6.5
8.9
8.7
4.3
11.3
5.5
Acres per farm reporting
13
33
13
9
7
7
4
Barley:
Percent of farms reporting
30.2
29.1
32,9
36.4
25.9
21.2
33.3
222
309
36
25
17
14
Percent of cropland harvested..
2.9
2.1
3.1
4.6
4.7
7.4
10.4
Percent of farms reporting
24.5
44.4
19.4
11.9
4.0
2.2
Sorghum for all purposes:
Percent of cropland harvested- -.
24.0
26,7
8.0
7.3
3.5
2.6
Acres per farm reporting
72
167
69
28
13
12
4
Irish potatoes:
Percent of farms reporting
46.4
23.9
73.6
26.6
54.4
22.8
50.4
20.1
32.5
11.0
21.2
12.3
IB. 7
6.1
Acres per farm reporting--
Percent of farms reporting
Percent of cropland harvested .
56
2.9
0.7
67
6,2
0.8
12
1.6
0.2
2
0.7
(Z)
Percent of cropland harvested . .
All hay:
Acres — percent of cropland bar-
Alfalfa mixtures:
1.6
1.9
0.9
1.3
1.6
2.5
Percent of cropland harvested. ..
13.3
12.6
20.4
15.1
11.4
7.4
3.2
Acres of specified crops as percent of
Acres of specified crops as percent of
85.7
86.2
84.1
90.2
76.0
85.6
88.6
93.6
94.2
91.2
87.6
89.0
85. 9
90.4
Z 0.06 percent or less.
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION
31
Cropland and Cropland T'se
As cotton farms are, by definition, those on which sales of cotton
and cottonseed account for 50 percent or more of total farm sales,
they depend primarily upon the cropland component of their land
resources. For this reason the size and utilization of the cropland
resources merit examination for the various economic classes of
cotton farms. An examination of the enterprise utilization of the
cropland resource also gives a useful indication of possible short-
term alternative cropland uses.
In general, region average acreages of cropland per farm show
about the same patterns of variations among the ten regions for
each economic class of farm as the average acreages of all land in
farms, which were discussed above.
The approximate range in region-averages of cropland per farm
for each economic class i.s as follows;
Class I — from about 980 acres (Region VI) to about 500
acres (Region V).
Class II — from about 380 acres (Region X) to about 115
acres (Region VII).
Class III — from about 240 acres (Region IX) to about 55
acres (Region X).
Class IV — from about 1(15 acres (Region IX) to 28 acres
(Region X).
Class V — from aliout 135 acres (Region IX) to about 15 acres
(Region X).
Class VI — from 65 acres (Region IX) to about 10 acres
(Region X).
In general, as was the case with average total acres per farm,
the region-averages of cropland per farm for Classes III through
VI tend to fall in three groups. Regions V, VII, and IX have
relatively large average acreages of cropland for farms in these
economic classes. Regions IV, VIII, and X have relatively small
averages of cropland acreage, and Regions I, II, III, and VI have
cropland averages per farm that fall between those of the other
tw o regional groups.
Table 16. — Percent Distribution for All Commercial Farms and for Cotton Farms in Each Economic Class, by Acres
IN Farm, by Regions: 1954
All
com-
mer-
cial
farms
Cotton farms by economic class of farm
Region and size of farm
All
com-
mer-
cial
farms
Cotton farms by economic class of farm
Region and size of farm
All
classes
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
All
classes
100. 0
2.0
34.7
28.1
25.7
7.1
1.7
0.7
100.0
0.2
7.4
17.3
38.9
27.0
6.9
2.3
100 0
2.5
30.2
18.6
24.9
15.7
5.3
2.8
100.0
0.1
2.0
3.8
27.2
41.5
19.6
5.8
100.0
2.6
25.7
17.1
21.6
17.1
8.4
7.6
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
REGION I
Number of farms, total
Under 10 acres
100.0
3.7
37.7
22 2
20.9
10.0
3.4
2.1
100.0
4.5
34.0
23.7
23.8
. 9.6
3.0
1,4
100.0
4.1
42.2
22.6
19.9
7.5
2.3
1.4
100.0
12.0
52.2
14.4
11.8
5.8
2.3
1.6
100.0
2.5
19.8
19.9
29.9
17.6
6 3
4.0
100.0
2.6
45. 0
25.3
18.3
6.1
1.8
0.9
100.0
3.1
48.7
24.3
18.1
4.6
0.9
0.3
100.0
4.5
60.1
23.0
16.7
4.4
0.9
0.4
100.0
13.2
.57.3
14.1
9.7
3.6
1.3
0.9
100.0
2.0
33.4
23.5
26 7
10.5
2.5
1.4
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
(Z)
37.3
31.0
23.0
7.2
1.2
0.3
100.0
0.1
34.2
27.3
27.6
8.8
1.7
0.4
100.0
0.3
39.8
28.4
23.7
6.7
0.9
0.2
100.0
0.9
70.5
18.0
8.7
1.7
0.2
(Z)
100. 0
100.0
0.9
49.6
27.2
17.8
3.9
0.5
0. 1
100.0
0.4
51.4
24.4
18.7
4.4
0.6
0.1
100.0
2.9
65.0
22.9
15.3
3.4
0.4
0.1
100.0
17.1
70.3
8.5
3.5
0.5
n.i
(Z)
100.0
1.3
37.2
23.3
28.3
8.7
100.0
8.4
69.4
19.5
10.4
1.9
0.3
0. 1
100.0
6.4
52.6
23.9
14.9
2. 1
n. 2
(Z)
100.0
9.3
65.4
20.8
12.3
2.0
0.2
(Z)
100.0
4.5.7
41.9
8.5
3.3
0.5
0.1
(Z)
100.0
4.0
40.6
28.8
22.1
3.9
0.6
(Z)
REGION VI
Number of farms, total
Ui\der 10 acres
100. 0
2.7
20.7
19.8
24.7
16.6
8.4
7. 1
100.0
1.2
5.9
13.4
34.0
28.6
10.2
6.7
100.0
4,0
31.9
18.2
23.1
14.2
6.4
3.2
100.0
1.4
1.8
2.1
12.7
31.9
28.1
22.0
100.0
7.1
38.2
16.3
13.9
9.6
6.1
9.8
100. 0
100. 0
100. 0
100. 0
100.0
0.6
69.4
23.9
14.3
1.4
0.3
0.1
100.0
0. 1
12.3
33.9
43.1
9.7
OS
0, 1
100,0
7,9
79.4
6.0
5.3
100.0
14.1
66.4
21.1
7.6
0.9
10 to 49 acres . -.
13.6
25.6
33.8
18.5
7.2
1.4
100.0
10 to 49 acres
3.0
47.6
32.7
16.7
100.0
0.6
6.2
50. 5
36.9
4.5
2.3
100.0
7.0
36.3
47.9
6.5
2.0
0.3
100 0
40.7
37.5
19.4
2.1
0.3
(Z)
100,0
50 to 99 acres .
3.4
5.2
23.0
68.4
100.0
1.6
16.3
39.7
28.0
14.4
100.0
60 to 99 acres
100 to 219 acres
100 to 219 acres
220 to 499 acres -
220 to 499 acres
500 to 999 acres
500 to 999 acres
1,000 acres and over
1,000 acres and over
REGION II
Number of farms, total
Under 10 acres
REGION VII
Number of farms, total
Under 10 acres
100.0
1 2
10 to 49 acres
6.4
17.4
26.8
35.5
12.2
2.7
100.0
0.3
2.3
33.7
52 2
9 6
1.9
100,0
2.5
15.0
55,2
24,3
2,6
0.4
100.0
1.1
69.9
25.8
10,9
1, 1
1.1
0, 1
100.0
50 to 99 acres
50 to 99 acres
1.7
28.9
35. 6
33.8
100,0
0.6
14.2
4,8,4
28,7
8, 1
100.0
34 5
100 to 219 acres
100. 6
100.0
11.1
38.9
31.1
18.9
100.0
24,8
220 to 499 acres
220 to 499 acres
500 to 999 acres
500 to 999 acres
0.6
0.1
100.0
1,000 acres and over
1,000 acres and over
REGION III
Number of farms, total
Under 10 acres
REGION VIII
Number of farms, total
10 to 49 acres-
Is. 6'
27.2
54.2
100.0
1.2
4.8
25.8
31.0
25.1
12.1
100.0
27.3
22. 2
24.4
lU. 1
.5.4
1.6
100. 0
13.1
49.3
23.7
13.9
100.0
1. 1
16.1
5.5.8
23,4
2,3
1,3
100.0
21,5
42.9
28 4
6 1
0,9
0,2
100,0
70.3
1.9
1 9
50 to 99 acres
50 to 99 acres
100 to 219 acres.-
100 to 219 acres
220 to 499 acres _
500 to 999 acres..
1.3
0.1
100.0
0,6
13,6
14,3
40.2
24.7
5.8
0.8
100.0
20.7
73.3
2.2
3.7
1.9
1,000 acres and over
REGION IV
Number of farms, total
Under 10 acres
REGION IX
Number of farms, total
Under 10 acres
100.0
4 8
10 to 49 acres
0.3
0.5
3.7
29.6
34.5
31.4
100.0
1.5
11.5
47.8
29.9
7.0
2.3
100.0
31.8
34.1
26.7
6.2
1.0
0.2
100. 0
10 to 49 acres
1.7
8.1
31 4
49.0
7.7
2.1
100.0
7.6
9.3
47.7
27.8
6,3
1,3
100.0
1.8
82.7
7.6
6.8
1.1
0.4
0.6
33 3
60 to 99 acres
2.2
45.6
37.8
14.5
100.0
1.9
36.7
41.7
16 9
2,8
100,0
100 to 219 acres
100 to 219 acres
220 to 499 acres
23.8
23 8
220 to 499 acres ___.
500 to 999 acres
500 tn 999 acres
9 6
1,000 acres and over...
REGION V
Number of farms, total
Under 10 acres...
REGION X
Number of farms, total
Under 10 acres
10 to 49 acres
100.0
10 to 49 acres... ..
9.8
12.1
34.3
31). 0
9.3
4.5
25.0
19.9
33.4
17.5
0. 1
1.4
22.3
37. 6
20.6
18.0
6.4
40.2
41.9
8.7
1.2
1.6
57.3
30.0
7.6
2.7
1.5
0.9
21 1
60 to 99 acres
2.3
14.0
33.0
50.7
1.8
23.7
40. 8
19.0
14.7
50 to 99 acres
100 to 219 acres
2.6
100 to 219 acres
220 to 499 acres
220 to 499 acres
500 to 999 acres
500 to 999 acres.
3. 2 0. 9
1. 0 0. 3
1,000 acres and over
1,000 acres and over
0.1
Z 0.05 percent or less.
32
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
Cropland utilization. — Data in table 15, concerning the acres of
cropland per farm and the jjercent of cropland used for various
major crops indicate that: (1) A higher percentage of harvested
cropland was devoted to cotton for the smaller than for the larger
size-of-farm business groups; and (2) fewer alternative crops of
a cash type are grown on the smaller farms than on the larger
farms. These indications suggest that the smaller size-of-busi-
ness farms in all regions are more dependent on cotton production
than the larger farms.
Data from both tables 14 and 15 bring out the significant fact
that, in all regions and for all economic classes, a substantial pro-
portion of cropland on cotton farms was idle in 1954. As 1954
was the first year since 1950 in which marketing quotas and
acreage allotments were in effect for cotton, it is probable that a
higher-than-usual acreage of cropland remained idle because, in
one season, acceptable alternative uses had not been found.
In table 15 the average acreage of cotton harvested per farm
is given for each economic class of farm in each region. The data
of tables 17 and 18 afford some indication of the variation of the
acreage of cotton from these averages for each economic class in
each region. For example. Class II farms in Region I had an
average of 74 acres of cotton. Data in table 17 reveal that 24
percent of these Class II farms harvested between 25 and 49
acres of cotton; 56 percent, between 50 and 99 acres; and 19
percent, between 100 and 199 acres.
Table 17. — Percent Distribution of Farms Reporting Cotton Harvested, by Acres Harvested, for All Commercial Farms
AND for Cotton Farms, by Economic Class, by Regions: 1954
Region and
economic class of
farm
Percent distribution of farms reporting by acres
cotton harvested
of
Region and
economic class of
farm
Percent distribution of farms reporting by acres
cotton harvested
of
Total
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
lUO. 0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100. 0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100. 0
1(10. 0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100. 0
100.0
100. 0
100.0
100.0
Under
5
acres
5 to 9
acres
10 to 24
acres
25 to 49
acres
60 to 99
acres
100 to
199
acres
200
acres
and
over
Total
Under
6
acres
6 0
3.6
6 to 9
acres
10 to 24
acres
25 to 49
acres
50 to 99
acres
100 to
199
acres
200
acres
and
over
TOTAL, 10 REGIONS
All commercial farms
9.5
6.0
28.7
27.0
38.8
42.2
0.2
1.5
19.7
64.3
69.3
19.2
37.1
60.0
11.8
12.5
1.3
19.5
46.9
22.6
6.8
1.0
7.3
11.4
6 3
6 8
13.1
45.3
22.2
7.2
1.3
0.2
1.6
2.4
3.8
66.2
13.0
0.7
(Z)
3.3
3.7
42.6
24.9
10.0
1.2
0.1
(Z)
0.4
0.7
60.6
19.0
0.5
(Z)
1.6
1.8
42.9
8.8
0.9
(Z)
0.1
0.2
45.6
0.6
region VI
All commercial farms
Cotton farms
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100. 0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100. 0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100. 0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
20.4
16.6
33,9
35.0
24.2
27.3
3.0
6.0
63.6
36.1
6.9
0.9
28.8
28.9
0.1
4.3
10.8
40.2
47.0
19. 1
19.6
19.4
11.5
12.9
"ei'e"
26.6
1.0
0.3
3.4
3.8
64.3
23.9
0.2
0.6
0.8
Class I
Class I
32.7
II
II
III
IV
1.6
III
(Z)
0.1
1.1
22.5
16. 5
6.8
0.3
4.6
32.4
57.1
37.0
28.6
9.6
64.7
58.9
23.6
22.3
16.6
0.3
0.8
24.9
1.2
0.3
7.9
33.1
60.7
4.9
2.2
V
V
VI
VI
REGION I
All commercialfarms
REGION VII
All commercial farms
26.7
31.5
5.6
24.5
49.5
44.7
17.3
4.1
21.7
22.2
13.1
54,3
22.8
6 1
4.0
12.5
15.8
35.8
46 6
35.8
7.7
1.2
0.2
13.2
13.9
45.2
21,6
3.2
0.5
3.6
4.7
Class I
Class I .
68.5
II
24.2
54.3
22.6
2.6
0.1
6.8
6 3
II_
HI
(Z)
1.0
7.1
32.9
66.3
23.3
22.6
24.6
0.1
(Z)
1.2
23.1
16.2
9.9
0.3
5.1
30.4
68.7
36.4
35.0
31.8
71.7
66.9
18.1
42.4
47.7
2.9
IV
IV
"■■(Z)'"
2.8
2.7
1.9
0.1
1.6
17.5
11.4
11.9
0.3
V
V
VI
VI
REGION II
All commercial farms
0.9
0.9
0.2
0.2
62.2
27.2
0.3
(Z)
(Z)
47.8
0.6
REGION VIII
All commercial farms
Cotton farms -
8.1
8.2
Class I
II
Ill
41.6
n
12.2
66.3
30.6
3.3
0.1
6.6
6.9
60.0
22.2
1.8
(Z)
1.1
26.7
57.1
39.0
22.2
7,5
3.0
20.7
46,2
23,6
2,1
3,7
13.1
10.1
0.3
7.1
14.7
26.6
41.8
4.8
20.7
21.8
3.8
66.8
29.3
4.2
2.2
2.3
III
12.2
65 1
74.2
22.2
41.4
43.9
2.2
IV
0.4
0.8
20.7
12.8
10.0
2.1
21.7
56.9
38.8
38.7
IV
V
"'4.0
26.9
0.4
0.1
12.6
60.9
48.1
1.8
0.6
V
vi
REGION III
All commercial farms
1.0
1.0
7.8
49.7
10.5
0.3
(Z)
(Z)
4.6
4.6
9.5
63.1
10.6
0.6
(Z1
0.3
0.3
61,6
18,3
0.1
0.1
0.1
40.6
0.2
REGION IX
All commercial farms
Cotton farms.
28.7
29.8
5 8
40.5
39.6
47.9
2L1
4.8
17.1
18.8
26.3
32.7
1.3
0.7
30.4
35.0
46,6
36,3
38,3
13,2
9.7
18.1
21.3
Class I
Class I
48.4
II
1.7
32.0
79.3
57.1
12.0
49.7
60.7
30.1
66 9
16.1
1.1
0,1
15.0
16.1
0.3
22.7
67.9
18.9
1.8
0.3
16.4
19.1
II
0,1
3.0
10.8
19.6
57.1
26.0
23.4
0.6
9.3
66.2
68.6
22.9
6.3
17.1
III
0.1
0.1
1.3
27.0
3.5
2.9
0.4
5.3
40.5
60.9
24.6
24.0
III
IV
4.4
IV
9.5
3.0
1.9
1.4
6.6
23.8
9.3
7.5
0.1
V
V
VI
VI
REGION IV
All commercial farms
1.8
1.7
46.8
13.2
0.3
1.0
1.0
43.3
0.3
REGION X
All commercial farms
12.7
14.1
36.3
L2
0.3
11.2
12.6
Class I
Class I
33.0
II
0.7
21.1
76.3
61.6
19.9
40.9
44.2
11
0.1
HI
'o.'i
1.0
18.3
8.9
5.2
0.1
6.3
36.7
61.6
25.0
20.5
Ill -
"""l.9
14.2
52.6
2.9
24.6
60.7
42.1
IV
IV -.
V
V
VI
VI
REGION V
All commercial farms
Cott(m farms... _.-
Class I
6.4
8 2
5.6
45.6
43.7
18.6
2.8
0. I
1.6
2.0
27.0
37.3
9.0
1.0
0.7
0.9
67.4
8.0
0.3
II
0.2
5.9
34.4
66.6
41.4
8.9
40.7
45.2
23.8
2.4
III
IV
" "o.'i"
0.3
12.4
0.3
0.7
7.6
43.8
V
VI
Z U.05 percent or less.
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION 33
Table 18. — Percent Distribution of Cotton Farms by Acres of Cotton Harvested, by Economic Class of Farm, by Regions: 1954
Z 0.05 percent or less.
Table 18 shows, for each region, the distribution of farms hav-
ing various sizes of cotton enterprises for each economic class.
Somewhat more general data concerning the geographic distri-
bution of cotton farms by size of the cotton enterprise are pro-
vided by the dot maps of figures 6, 7, 8, and 9.
The relative importance of cropland, of cotton and of other
major crops, to the incomes of cotton farmers is further indicated
by data in table 19. This table shows percentage distributions
for each economic class of farm in each region, for total farm sales
by the crop or livestock enterprise source.
Crops account for about 90 percent of the total sales for each
economic class in each region except for Class I farms in Region
Percent distribution of farms reporting by acres
cotton harvested
Of
RcRinn and
economic chiss of
farm
Percent distribution of farms reporting by acres
cotton harvested
of
economic class of
farm
Total
LTnder
5
acres
5 to 9
acres
10 to 24
acres
25 to 49
acres
50 to 99
acres
100 to
199
acres
200
acres
and
over
Total
Under
6
acres
100,0
6 to 9
acres
10 to 24
acres
25 to 49
acres
50 to 99
acres
100 to
199
acres
200
acres
and
over
TOTAL. 10 REGIONS
100.0
3.0
5.0
9.0
22.2
35.7
25.1
100. 0
0.5
2.2
7.7
25.9
36.3
27.5
100.0
O.I
0.4
1.9
11.9
39.8
45.9
100.0
0.3
1.0
4.0
19.1
40,8
34.8
100,0
2.3
4.7
11.8
28.0
39.8
13.5
100.0
1.0
2.5
6.8
16.5
32.3
40.9
100,0
100.0
100. 0
(Z)
0.2
4.2
33.8
60.3
11.5
100.0
100.0
0.3
7.7
33.7
40.0
10.3
2.0
100. 0
100.0
5.8
33.2
29.fi
23.8
7.0
0.6
100. 0
0.8
60.0
41.4
7.4
0.4
lon.o
34.1
33.3
24.4
6.9
1.2
0.1
100. 0
36.1
68.6
.6.2
0.2
100. 0
70.8
24,3
4,6
0.4
100.0
94.2
6.8
REGION VI
100. 0
2.1
9.7
22.2
30.0
22.7
13.3
100.0
2.7
9.9
21.1
30.7
26.3
10.4
100.0
17.2
24.7
21.6
17.2
14.3
5.1
100.0
28.6
39.6
16.0
9.8
6.3
0.7
100. 0
38,0
26,9
17.2
11.7
5.7
1.6
100.0
100.0
100.0
0.2
2.1
61.8
39.7
.5.7
0.5
100, 0
(Z)
1.5
7.9
42 7
41.1
6,8
100.0
100.0
"51.4
46.7
2.4
0.5
100.0
36 2
62.1
L7
100. 0
ClassI
ClassI
II
82.1
17.9
III
(Z)
0,3
6.6
93.1
100.0
0.1
3.8
42.9
53.2
100.0
Ill
6.1
46.8
38,2
8,9
100. 0
IV
1.7
.5.3
93.0
100.0
14.3
4.5.1
40.6
ion. 0
V
V
VI
REGION VII
Cotton farms
VI
REGION' I
100.0
0.5
7.7
33.0
43.6
13.9
1.3
100.0
10.2
00. 4
22.1
4.8
2.6
100. 0
6.0
29.2
47.8
14.9
2.0
0.1
100.0
56.1
38.3
4.9
0.7
100.0
Class I
Class I
33.1
II
4.6
36.4
60.9
7.9
0.2
100.0
II
(Z)
1.2
13.2
50.3
35.3
100.0
61.9
III
0.1
0.1
6.7
93.1
100.0
0.1
4.6
38.8
50.5
100.0
4.9
37.2
47.9
10,0
100.0
Ill
13.3
IV
IV
V
""3.7'
96.3
100.0
1.1
17.1
81.8
100.0
1.7
V
VI
REGION II
VI. ..
100.0
100.0
19.0
77.8
3.2
100.0
91.7
8.3
REGION VIII
Cotton farms
100.0
Class I
Class I
87.4
0.9
19.3
58.2
20.8
0.8
100.0
29.6
45.6
23.6
1.4
II
1.3
26.5
43.6
24.7
6.0
100.0
20.2
,50.3
20.9
1.6
1.0
100.0
0,7
27,8
23,4
2,5.9
21.8
0.3
100.0
6.6
67.6
23.1
2.2
0.6
6.9
III
0.5
16.3
61.9
21,3
100.0
III
IV
6.7
IV
0.5
3.3
96.2
100.0
0.7
24.7
74.6
100.0
"30.6"
70.0
100.0
18.3
61.1
20.6
100.0
V
VI
REGION- III
100.0
2.2
48.7
42.4
5.6
0.2
0.9
100. 0
4.9
64.6
27.3
3.0
0.2
100.0
43.8
54.8
1.4
100.0
98.0
2.0
REGION IX
Cotton farms
100. 0
6.6
53.7
21.2
15,8
3,7
0, 1
100.0
63.3
45,0
1.2
0.6
100.0
37.3
40.0
17.6
3,7
1.6
100. 0
ClassI -.-
II
ClassI
II
65.0
(Z)
2.9
34.5
53,1
9.5
100.0
6.0
38.6
48.7
7.4
0.3
100.0
0.1
7.0
62.9
35.0
4.9
0.2
100.0
1.1
1.5.8
35.3
34.2
13.0
100.0
0.9
10.3
48.5
34.4
6.6
0.3
31.7
(Z)
0.1
5.4
94.5
100.0
(Z)
2.6
42.6
54.8
100.0
Ill
3.3
IV
IV
"60.0
60.0
100.0
21.0
52.6
26.4
100.0
(Z)
V
V
VI
REGION X
Cotton farms
ClassI
II
VI..
REGION IV
Cotton farms
100.0
62.7
36.3
2.0
100.0
98.8
1.2
100.0
97.4
2.1
0.6
100.0
Class I
99.9
II
0,1
4.9
41.5
48.2
5.3
100.0
0.1
III
" "o.'s'
13.8
85.7
100.0
0.1
6.2
69.1
34.6
100.0
III
IV
V
"11.7
43.2
45.1
6.7
38.3
46.0
8.9
IV
V
VI
REGION V
Cotton farms ...
100.0
0.7
13.8
36.5
37.5
11.3
0.2
100.0
13.3
47.3
31.4
8.0
100.0
74.7
22.7
2.6
Class I
II
(Z)
0.9
12.9
47.9
38.3
1.1
14.5
39.0
40.2
5.2
III.
"""o.'i"
2.2
97.4
0.1
0.6
11.8
87.5
IV
V
VI
II. For Class I farms in this region crops account for 76 percent
of total sales. Cotton provides about 75 percent of the total
sales for most economic classes and regions. In Region I, cotton
sales account for around 70 percent of the total sales on farms in
Classes I, II, and III, and on Class I farms in Region II cotton
accounts for only 60 percent of total sales. Both tobacco and
peanuts are important sources of farm income on many cotton
farms of Region I. Livestock and livestock products are an
unusually important source of income on Class I cotton farms in
Region II.
As indicated by data in table 19, cotton sales account for a
larger percentage of total sales on the smaller than on the larger
size-of-business groups of farms.
34
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
;y4~:^MBER OF FARMS WITH LESS THAN 25 BALES OF COTTON HARVESTED.
FOR COTTON SUBREGIONS 1954
UNITED STATES TOTAL
779,567
1 D0T=200 FARMS
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
MAP NOA54-537
BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
Figure 6.
^^^^NUMBER OF FARMS WITH 25-49 BALES OF COTTON HARVESTED.
FOR COTTON SUBREGIONS 1954
UNITED STATES TOTAL
45.106
us DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
\
f
2-
i
■-- ;.59.
5^
I
I
VW 1
r-r]
\
^^— ^— -
v~
I 1
-\
I
1
103
V
IV"
r
]
^;^J^^oiJ
> r
M
1
^ 4-5 j^A — '
mli^
' 1
1 DOT= 10 FARMS
^99^
r'/
MAP NO A54-538
Figure 7.
-•" BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION
35
JJUMBER OF FARMS WITH 50-99 BALES OF COTTON HARVESTED.
FOR COTTON SUBREGIONS 1954
I
1
-- — ^
'l
7
!
103
-L }
r'
1
1—1 L
/f^-V
^1
r^t~^
74 S-
('.4
J "'•- 1
cv e~^
II
I Vv>f».
ftS^
r ■
1- roi _j '^r^
"i"
a
t^ /?
L
lij^P
■ -■' J J':
/
Ur —
'l~f/
i_,
■ ' ■ r-" f
/ «° Id f
''^V^
UNITED STATES TOTAL
20,440
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
iSJ*"'
I DOT=IO FARMS
MAP N0A54-539
-•■■ BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
Figure S.
^^-^JNIUMBER OF FARMS WITH 100 OR MORE BALES OF COTTON HARVESTED.
FOR COTTON SUBREGIONS: 1954
7 4 ^— 'j,-H3
UNITED STATES TOTAL
17.903
:^^'':^
D0T=10 FARMS
us DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
MAP N0A54-540
BUREAU OF THE CENSUS
FlGDKK 9.
36
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
Table 19. — Distribution of Farm Sales by Source, for Cotton Farms, by Economic Class, by Regions: 1954
Region aud item
REGION I
Gross sales
All crops :
Cotton
Corn
Tobacco
Peanuts
Oats
All otber crops
All livestock and livestock products
Cattle and calves
Ho?s and pig?
Poultry and poultry products
Dairy products
All otber livestock and livestock products.
Forest products
REGION II
Gross sales
All crops
Cotton
Corn
Wheat
Oats
All otber crops
All livestock and livestock products
Cattle and calves
Hogs and pigs
Poultry and poultry products.-.
Dairy products
All other livestock and livestock products.
Forest products
REGION III
Gross sales
All crops
Cotton
Corn
Soybeans
All other crops
AH livestock and livestock products. __.
Cattle and calves
Hogs and pigs
Poultry and poultry products...
Da iry prod ucts
All other livestock and livestock products
Forest products
REGION" IV
Gross sales
All crops
Cotton
Rice
Soybeans for beans
Oats
All other crops..
All livestock and livestock products.
Cattle and calves
Hogs and pigs ._ _..
Poultry and poultry products
Dairy products
All other livestock and livestock products
Forest products
REGION V
Gross sales
All crops
Cotton
Corn
Soybeans
Oats
All otber crops
All livestock and livestock products
Cattle and calves
Hogs and pigs
Poultry and poultry products
Dairy products
All otber livestock and livestock products-
Forest products
Z 0.05 percent or less.
All classes
Dollars
158, 390, 782
146, 702. 510
116, 223, 089
3, 239. 284
11, 752, 720
9, 221, 847
1, 540, 720
4, 724, 850
11, 095, 020
3, 240, 704
7, 051, 278
528. 129
218. 928
55, 981
593, 252
66, 675, 670
100.0
62, 110, 765
93.1
5.5, 969, 596
83.9
1, 064, 273
1.6
1. 160. 569
1.7
777.119
1.2
3. 139, 208
4.7
4, 0.59, 875
6.1
1,691.067
2.5
660, 914
1.0
714, 359
1.1
954, 332
1.4
49,203
0.1
505, 030
366, 693, 693
100.0
336,410,511
91.7
314,401,906
85.7
10,070,290
2.7
4, 548. 729
1.2
7, 380, .586
2.0
28, 762, 558
7.8
12. 803. 709
3.5
7, 713. 805
2.1
2, 203, 220
0.6
6. 568, 587
1.5
473, 237
0.1
1, 520, 624
683. 700. 660
100.0
604. OOS. 500
96.6
606. 672, 777
86.8
4, S7S, .592
0.8
34.191.420
5.9
5. 669. 693
1.0
12. 506. 018
2.2
19. 282. 879
3.3
11.697,608
2.0
.5. 199. 591
0.9
1,280,848
0.2
762, 505
0.1
362, 237
0.1
409. 281
202. 580
Percent
100.0
92.6
73.4
2.0
7.4
6.8
1.0
3.0
7.0
2.0
4.6
0.3
0.1
(Z)
61. 382. 197
100.0
54. 832. 639
89.3
50. 934. 495
83.0
689,711
1.1
1, 042, 412
1.7
303, 065
0.6
1, 862, 866
3.0
6, 347, 078
10.3
4, 502, 117
7.3
983, 470
1.6
611,068
0.8
310,511
0.5
39, 912
0.1
0.3
Economic class of farm
Percent
100.0
89.5
71.0
2.0
2.7
2.4
. 5.3
6.1
9.4
5.3
2.9
0.4
0.7
0.1
100.0
76.4
60.7
1.0
4.8
2.4
7.5
17.8
II. 8
1.0
0.8
4.1
(Z)
100.0
88.3
76.6
1.9
6.9
2.9
11.1
6.6
1.6
0.2
2.5
0.2
0.6
100.0
95.2
79.4
2.4
8.8
2.4
2.3
4.7
3.5
0.7
0.2
0.2
0.1
100.0
88.7
81.1
0.6
1.6
1.2
4.4
11.0
9.2
0.9
0.4
0.6
(Z)
0.2
Percent
100.0
88.2
68.5
2 2
3^5
5.8
2. 7
.5! 5
11.2
4.8
5.3
0. B
0.5
(Z)
0.6
100.0
88.1
7.3.6
1.4
4.0
3.5
5.6
10.9
7.0
0.6
0.5
2.7
0. 1
1.0
100.0
88.6
79.0
2.4
5.2
2.1
11.0
6.8
2 2
o!8
1.1
0.3
0.4
10.0
96.4
83.0
0.3
10.1
I.l
1.9
3.5
2.2
1.0
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
100.0
89.6
80.6
1.9
4.6
0.9
1.7
10.2
8.6
0.6
0.7
0.3
(Z)
III
100.0
92. 5
69.8
2.1
10.4
6.9
0.7
2.6
7.1
2.1
4.7
0.3
(Z)
(Z)
0.4
100.0
8.8.3
73.3
1.7
4.1
2.9
6.4
10.6
5.6
1.0
2.0
2.0
(Z)
100.0
90.1
83.6
3.2
1.6
1.7
9.5
4.3
3.0
0.6
1.3
0.2
100.0
97.1
88.0
0.2
6.6
0.5
1.8
2.9
1.4
1.1
0.2
0.1
(Z)
(Z)
100.0
90.1
83.8
1.1
2.8
0.5
1.9
6.7
1.9
0.7
0.2
(Z)
IV
100.0
94.0
73.4
2.3
9.6
6.4
0.3
2.0
5.8
1.2
4.4
0.2
(Z)
(Z)
0.2
100. 0
93.1
8.3.0
1.8
2. 1
1.4
4.8
6.2
2.3
0.9
1.4
1.5
0.1
0.8
0.3
100.0
97.4
92.3
0.2
2.4
0.1
2.5
1.1
1.0
0.2
0.1
(Zl
100.0
89.4
84.6
1.4
1.1
0.2
2.1
10.4
6.7
2.1
0.8
0.6
0.1
0.2
Percent
100.0
93.4
76.6
1.9
6.4
5.9
0.1
2.6
6.4
1.1
5.0
0.3
(Z)
(Z)
100.0
94.4
86.1
1.8
1.3
0.9
4.3
6.0
1.8
1.0
0.8
1.3
0.1
00.0
100.0
92.2
92.8
86.4
88.1
3.4
2 7
0.6
0.2
1.8
1.9
7.6
6.8
2.9
2.7
2.4
1.7
n.6
0.7
1.6
1.5
0.1
0.1
0.4
100.0
97.8
94.6
(Z)
0.8
0.1
2.3
2.1
1.0
0.8
0.3
(Z)
(Z)
(Z)
100.0
89.6
85.1
1.1
0.4
(Z)
2.9
10.0
6.3
1.9
1.1
0.6
0.1
0.6
VI
Percent
100.0
94.4
81.4
1.2
4.7
4.1
0.3
2.7
5.3
1.1
3.8
0.4
(Z1
(Z)
0.3
100.0
94.7
88.2
1.0
0.7
0.3
4.6
4.7
1.6
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.1
100.0
92.8
88.4
1.7
0.1
2.6
6.6
2.9
1.5
0.8
1.2
0.1
0.6
100.0
97.1
94.5
" 6.'5
0.1
2.1
2.8
1.6
0.8
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
100.0
88.4
81.2
0.9
0.3
'e.'o
10.8
6.1
2.3
1.7
0.6
0.2
0.8
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION 37
Table 19. — Distribution of Farm Sales by Source, for Cotton Farms, by Economic Class, by Regions: 1954 — Continued
Region and item
Gross sales. --
All crops.-
Cotton
Corn -.
Swectpntatoes.-
Sorghum
All other crops.
REGION VI
All livestock and livestock prodncts
Cattle and calves -..
Hops and pigs
Poultry and poultry products
Dairy products
.\11 other livestock and livestock products .
Forest products
Gross sales ...
All crops
Cotton
Corn
Sorghum
All other crops.
REGION VII
Xll livestock and livestock products
Cattle and calves
Hogs and pips
Poultry and poultry products
Dairy products...
All other livestock and livestock products. ,
Forest products
Gross sales. -.
All crops
Cotton. -- -
Sorghum
All other crops.
REGION VIII
All livestock and livestock products
Cattle and calves
Hogs and pies
Poultry and poultry products
Dairy products..
All other livestock and livestock products.
Forcst products
Gross sales...
.All crops
Cotton
Sorghum
Wheat
All other crops.
REGION IX
All livestock and livestock products
Cattle and calves
Hogs and pigs
Poultry and poultry products
Dairy products
All other livestock and livestock products.
Forest products
Gross sales
All crops
Cotton
Barley
Rice.".
Alfalfa and mi.\ture .
Sugar beets
Sorghum
Vegetables
Fruits and nuts
All other crops
REGION X
All livestock and livestock products...
Cattle and calves
Poultry and poultry products
Dairy products
All other livestock and livestock products.
Forest products
All classes
Dollars
43, fill), 980
4(1, 278, 887
36.110,319
9X3, 971
707, 033
1, .148, 850
802. 7118
2. 724, 399
1, ,593, 951
31)1, 478
770, 397
35, 185
23, 388
7,700
208, 194, 743
240. 1)45, 470
201, 803, 204
0, 551, 292
23, 840, 124
13, 790, 790
22,117,398
14.418,639
2, 516, 150
3, 359, 847
), 270. 045
552,711
31, 875
319, 545, 051
310, 726, 070
251, 809, 122
51,014,670
4. 929, 607
2. 972, 071
8, 818, 081
4,924.031
1, 281, 393
1, 124, 217
936, 319
552, 721
300
507. 765, 189
543, 091, 872
433, 009. 827
33, 798, 494
3, 341, 928
23, 715, 254
4,081,571
7, 941, 113
8, 009, 691
0, 040, 5,56
22, 563, 638
24, 660, 312
16. 827, 001
340, 059
5, 144, 900
2. 348, 280
13, 005
100.0
93. 6
84.0
2.3
1.8
3.6
2.0
6.3
3.7
0.7
1.8
0. 1
0.1
(Z)
c
100.0
91.7
75.3
2,4
8.9
5.1
8.2
5.4
0.9
1.3
0.5
0.2
(Z)
89, 657. 922
100. 0
87,118,1,33
97.2
72, 806, 378
81,3
3, 992, 971
4.5
10, 268, 784
11.4
2, 536, 589
2.8
1, 590, 915
1,7
251. 420
0.3
171. 290
0.2
518, 087
0.6
4,871
(Z)
(Z)
100. 0
97.2
78.8
10.0
1.5
0,9
1.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.2
(Z)
100. 0
95.0
70.3
0.0
0.0
4.2
0.7
1.4
1.6
1.1
4.0
4.3
3.0
0.1
0.9
0.4
(Z)
100. 0
93.9
78.2
2.0
(Z)
6.1
5.6
0.2
0.2
(Z)
0.1
100. 0
96. 3
71.4
0.8
18.8
5.3
3.7
3,1
0.2
0.1
0,1
0.1
(Z)
100. fl
96.7
79.4
5,2
12.1
3.3
2.2
0.3
(Z)
0.8
(Z)
(Zl
100. 0
97.7
77. 7
17.2
1.8
1,0
2.3
1.5
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
100.0
95.8
75.5
6.6
0.7
4.1
0.8
1.4
1.0
0.8
4.3
(Z)
4.2
3.1
0.7
0.4
(Z)
Economic class of farm
Ptrceiit
100. 0
94.3
85. 3
2.2
(Z)
6.0
0.7
6.7
3.9
0.5
1.2
(Z)
(Z)
100. 0
92.7
76.0
1,8
9.8
6.1
7.3
6,3
0.7
0.5
0.6
0,3
(Z)
100.0
98.0
83,7
4.0
10.2
2.0
1,0
0.3
0,3
0.4
(Z)
100. 0
97.1
80.5
14.9
1.0
0.8
2.9
1.4
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.1
100. 0
95.0
80.7
1.0
0.2
6.9
(Z)
1.5
0.7
2.3
2.2
5.0
2.4
0.2
2.1
0.4
III
Percent
100.0
94. 1
80. 9
2.8
1.1
1.7
1.6
5.8
2,7
0.8
2.1
0. 1
0. 1
(Z)
100. 0
90.7
76.5
3.3
6.6
5,3
9.3
6.3
1.2
1,2
0.4
0.3
(Z)
100.0
97.6
84.0
2.4
11.0
2.5
1.6
0.3
0.5
0.1
(Z)
100. 0
95.4
81.7
11.3
1.3
1,0
4.6
2,4
0.5
1,1
0.5
0.1
100. 0
94.1
83.1
1.2
3.9
0.6
0.5
3.2
1.4
5.9
2.2
0.6
2.5
0.7
(Z)
100. 0
93.3
83.2
2.2
6.3
0.7
1.9
6.6
3.0
0,9
2.0
0.1
<Z)
(Z)
100. 0
88.0
70.6
3.8
3.3
5,0
11.3
6.4
1.4
2.4
0.9
0.2
(Z)
100.0
97.7
85.3
2.0
10.4
2.3
0.6
0.4
1.1
0.2
100.0
92.0
79.6
9.2
2.3
0.8
8.0
3.9
0.6
2.0
1.5
(Z)
(Z)
100.0
94.3
85.5
0.4
1.4
0.3
0.7
5.0
0.9
5.6
2.3
0.3
1.7
1.2
Percent
100. 0
91.3
81.9
1.6
4,5
0,4
2,9
8.7
4,6
1,1
2.8
0.2
0.1
(Z)
100.0
80.7
70.8
3.4
2.0
4.6
13.3
7.1
1.6
3.7
0,7
0.2
(Z)
100.0
97.9
87.0
0.7
10.3
2.1
0,9
0.5
0.0
(Z)
100. 0
89.5
79.5
6.4
2.2
1.4
10.5
4.4
0.8
2.7
2.6
(Z)
100.0
97.7
93.3
0.4
1.6
0.8
0.2
1.4
0.1
2.3
1.0
0.7
0.2
0.4
Z 0.05 percent or less.
38
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
Pasture and Woodland
Examination of the distribution of gross sales by source reveals
that for most economic classes of farms and for most regions,
pasture and woodland resources on cotton farms do not con-
tribute substantially to cash farm income. The data in tables 14
and 15, however, show that, especially in some regions, pasture
and woodland resources comprise, from the standpoint of acre-
age, a substantial part of the land resources on cotton farms.
In appraising the use of pasture resources on farms it is rele-
vant to examine the data concerning the kinds and numbers^ of
livestock found on different economic classes of cotton farms in
the different regions. Information of this type is given in
table 20.
In general, only the larger size-of-business groups of farms in
each region have livestock enterprises of a commercial size and
type. The beef-cattle enterprise appears to be the most com-
mon, but hogs are important in a few regions.
Table 20. — Average Number per Farm Reporting and Percent of Farms Reporting Specified Classes of Livestock, for Cotton
Farms, by Economic Class of Farm, by Regions: 1954
Region and item
REGION I
Horses and mules:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting,,
All cattle and calves;
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.
Milk cows:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.
Hogs and pigs:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting..
Chickens 4 months old and over;
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting..
Sales of livestock and livestock products
as a percent of gross farm sales
REGION II
Horses and mules:
Percent of farms reporting
.Average number per farm reporting.
All cattle and calves:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting..
Milk cows:
Percent of farms reporting ,
Average number per farm reporting..
Hogs and pigs:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.
Chickens 4 months old and over:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting..
Sales of livestock and livestock products
as a percent of gross farm sales
REGION" III
Horses and mules:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting..
All cattle and calves:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.
Milk cows;
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.
Hogs and pigs:
Percent of farms reporting ,
Average number per farm reporting..
Chickens 4 months old and over:
Percent of farms reporting.
Average number per farm reporting.
Sales of livestock and livestock products
as a percent of gross farm sales
Economic class of farm
AU
classes
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
61.8
2
80.1
10
01.8
5
62.1
3
58.2
2
68.5
2
69.3
1
58.3
7
87.8
99
81.1
40
68.3
13
58.3
56.4
6
55.6
3
45.1
2
41.1
7
49.4
3
52.0
2
46.1
2
44.8
2
42.6
2
72.5
12
66.9
74
78.2
38
80.2
21
74.6
14
72.4
9
68.1
6
78.6
25
-14.9
126
71.7
61
80.9
35
79.6
26
7S.0
23
79.0
20
7.0
9.4
11.2
7.1
6.8
6.4
5.3
58. 9
2
9.';. 7
13
60.6
5
60.4
3
52.6
2
64.9
2
63.9
2
69.4
6
9.5.7
213
95.0
53
77.4
24
72.9
8
70.2
6
67.3
3
62.8
2
39.1
24
65.6
6
56.9
4
64.2
3
63.8
2
61.9
2
72.1
4
78.3
30
77.8
12
68.6
7
73.0
5
73.7
4
70.6
3
75.5
29
60.9
249
66.1
72
64.0
47
75.0
42
75.9
29
75.9
24
6.1
17.8
10.9
10.6
6.2
5.0
4.7
56.7
2
73.7
10
58.4
5
49.5
3
47.5
3
62.6
2
67.1
2
7.3.1
9
79.2
168
84.2
60
81.5
20
75.2
10
71.8
7
72 1
6
62.4
3
40.0
14
64.6
6
67.0
4
65.4
3
62.4
3
60.7
2
68.1
6
62.3
44
67.3
20
72.0
12
71.3
7
68.4
5
65.5
3
81.4
30
50.3
77
71.1
70
84.0
46
84.3
36
80.9
29
80.5
24
7.8
11. 1
11.0
9.5
7.5
6.8
6.6
Region and item
REGION IV
Horses and mules:
Percent of farms reporting..
Average number per farm reporting.
All cattle and calves:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.
Milk cows:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.
Hogs and pigs:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.
Chickens 4 months old and over:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.
Sales of livestock and livestock products
as a percent of gross farm sales
REGION V
Horses and mules:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.
All oattle and calves:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting,
Milk cows:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reportmg.
Hogs and pigs:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.
Chickens 4 months old and over:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.
Sales of livestock and livestock products
as a percent of gross farm sales
REGION VI
Horses and mules:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.,
All cattle and calves:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting..
Milk cows:
Percent of farms reportmg
Average number per farm reporting.
Hogs and pigs:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting..
Chickens 4 months old and over:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting..
Sales of livestock and livestock products
as a percent of gross farm sales
Economic class of farm
classes
I
II
III
IV
V
28.2
3
57.5
7
30.6
4
26.6
2
27 9
2
26.8
2
46.4
11
66.8
112
63.0
25
65.8
10
60.5
7
39. S
6
37.7
2
32.2
5
43.1
2
46.8
2
42.7
2
33.1
2
48.8
6
43.8
35
48.9
13
50.8
9
63.4
6
47 7
4
70.2
29
61.1
60
72.0
43
73.2
37
75.0
29
68.9
24
3.3
4.7
3.5
2.9
2.6
2.1
60.2
2
66.0
8
51.6
3
45.6
2
46.9
2
52.4
2
77.0
17
85.1
242
83.6
67
80.7
33
77 6
19
72.6
12
60.0
3
21.4
13
49.3
3
59.7
3
62.1
3
66.8
3
60.6
6
36.7
34
44.4
10
64.2
10
61.7
8
69.4
6
83.3
32
25.1
38
66.8
61
79,0
42
83.6
39
83.5
31
10.3
11.0
10.2
9.6
10.4
10.0
44.8
3
42.9
5
36.2
2
28.2
2
40.3
3
58.9
3
81.3
16
76.2
106
81.0
38
81.4
16
85.0
10
82,4
10
62.0
3
38.1
3
53.0
3
69.3
3
69.3
2
66.6
3
67.6
6
38.1
13
52.0
7
64.6
8
71.0
6
73.2
4
84.1
80
671
80
70.0
133
86,0
101
86.9
78
86.2
62
6.3
6.1
6.7
6.8
6.6
8,7
VI
32.3
2
31.7
2
41.9
3
64.1
2.8
74.6
2
63.4
2
63.8
4
6.2
28
64.8
3
72.3
8
62.6
2
70.4
4
87.3
47
10.5
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION
39
Table 20. — Average Number per Farm Reporting and Percent of Farms Reporting Specified Classes of Livestock, for Cotton
Farms, by Economic Class of Farm, by Regions: 1954 — Continued
Region and item
REGION VII
Horses and mules:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting-
All cattle and calves:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting-.
Milk cows:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.
Hogs and pigs:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.
Chickens 4 months old and over:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.
Sales of livestock and livestock products
as a percent of gross farm sales... ,
REGION VIII
Horses and mules:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.
All cattle and calves:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.
Milk cows:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.
Hogs and pigs:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting..
Chickens 4 months old and over:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting..
Sales of livestock and livestock products
as a percent of gross farm sales. ,
Economic class of farm
All
classes
21.2
2
78.4
16
68.0
3
42.4
6
74.9
67
8.2
47.9
24
34.5
4
20.2
U
37.6
46
2.8
31.9
3
67.0
68
34.6
3
24.3
18
39.2
64
3.7
IS. 3
3
53,0
77
31.7
10
15.1
37
24.3
47
27.6
2
77,2
31
47.1
3
34.2
11
60.8
71
12,1
2
67. 1
17
42,7
3
22.6
11
41.4
68
2.0
III
20.5
2
82,9
19
58,7
3
41,5
8
73.6
70
13,2
1
54,0
12
24.1
6
40.4
45
IV
15.6
2
80,0
13
60.4
3
43.7
6
78.3
71
11,6
1
32.5
6
23.2
2
16.6
6
39.6
47
19.7
2
77.4
11
61.6
3
44.8
6
79.6
66
22.0
2
37.0
6
27.1
2
21.2
4
37 0
31
VI
33.7
2
67.3
2
79.3
47
29.6
2
42.6
4
35.2
2
18.5
3
48.1
21
Region and item
REGION IX
Horses and mules;
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per fai-m reporting.
All cattle and calves:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.
MUk cows:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.
Hogs and pigs:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.
Chickens 4 months old and over:
Percent of farms reporting...
Average number per farm reporting.
Sales of livestock and livestock products
as a percent of gross farm sales
REGION X
Horses and mules:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.
All cattle and calves:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting.
Milk cows:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting..
Hogs and pigs:
Percent of farms reporting _
Average number per farm reporting.
Chickens 4 months old and over:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting..
All sheep:
Percent of farms reporting
Average number per farm reporting..
Sales of livestock and livestock products
as a percent of gross farm sales
Economic class of farm
AU
classes
17.7
2
66.2
15
62.6
3
23.6
3
60.4
49
15.4
14
40,2
38
6,9
184
23,0
2
64,8
25
47.3
3
68.3
67
34.7
3
48.6
107
27.4
13
12,2
26
30.4
40
8.2
368
16.7
2
54.7
3
33.9
11
70,7
72
21.5
2
59,0
21
43.2
6
20.1
9
49.2
38
8,3
45
III
14,1
2
64.8
3
75,5
70
4.6
16.1
2
51.3
13
39.1
4
41.9
43
6, 1
19
IV
14.0
2
68 2
12
65.1
3
28,0
73,4
67
11,4
2
43.7
10
30.7
3
14 3
12
48.7
34
5.1
10
18.9
2
61,1
11
62. (
27.5
3
68 7
62
10.5
12,0
1
42,3
3
27.6
1
14.1
3
42.3
32
VI
33.3
2
71.4
71.4
2
14.3
2
81.0
41
7.9
2
21.1
2
21.1
1
6.3
2
39.5
30
2,6
32
40
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
Section 5.— LABOR RESOURCES AND USE
For two chief reasons the characteristics and the utilization of
labor on cotton farms are of special importance.
First, it represents the input of the human agent in cotton
farming. Second, the extent to which labor is combined with
other resources, in patterns that are economically and techni-
cally effective, determines the levels of income from farming that
are available to the people on cotton farms.
This report provides several t.vpes of data on labor resources
and use: (1) The age comjDosition of the operators of cotton
farms; (S) the days of off-farm work by operators of cotton farms;
(3) the proportion of cotton farms for which off-farm income of
the famih- exceeds the value of farm sales; (4) the man-equiva-
lents of all labor and its percentage distributions by type of
worker; (5) the distributions of expenditures for Jiired labor;
and (6) acres of cropland and acres of cotton harvested per man-
eciuivalent.
AGE OF OPERATOR
Information relating to the distribution of farm operators by-
age groups bj' economic class of farm, and data concerning the
proportions of farms in each economic class that are operated by
persons in each age group, are useful in analyzing the character-
istics of the labor resource on cotton farms.
Data concerning the distribution of farm operators of each
age group among economic classes of farms are found in table 21.
For most regions about 3 percent of all operators of cotton farm
are under 25 years of age. In Regions I through V more than 7
and usually nearer 80 percent of farm operators under 25 years of
age are found on farms in Economic Classes V and VI. These are
farms that had gross sales of between $250 and $2,500 in 1954.
It would seem reasonable to infer that a number of these young
operators would be relatively receptive to opportunities for non-
farm work and/or to adjustments that would permit an increase
In the size of their farm business.
In Regions I through V about one-eighth of all operators of
cotton farms are between 25 and 35 years of age. Most of these
also are on Class V and Class VI farms. They would appear to
face problems of adjustment similar to those of operators under
25 years of age.
In Regions VI and VII about 40 and 35 percent, respectively,
of operators under 25 years of age are found on Classes V and VI
farms. Nearly one-third of the operators from 25 to 35 years old
also operate Class V or VI farms.
For the remaining 3 regions small percentages of the younger
age groups of farm operators are found on the 2 smallest size-of-
business groups.
Table 21. — Percent Distribution of Operators of Cotton Farms in Each Age Group,
BY Regions: 1954
BY Economic Class of Farm,
Region and age of operator
REGION I
All age groups.
L'nder 25 years
25 to 34 years
35 to 44 years
45 to 54 years
55 to 64 years
65 years and over
REGION II
All age groups..
lender 25 years
25 to 34 years.. _
35 to 44 years
45 to 54 years
55 to 64 years
£5 years and over
REGION III
All age groups.,
[Tnder 25 years
25 to 34 years
35 to 44 years
45 to 54 years
55 to 64 years
65 years and over
REGION IV
All age groups.
Under 25 years
25 to 34 years
35 to 44 years
45 to 54 years
55 to 64 years
65 years and over
REGION V
All age groups-
Under 25 years
25 to 34 years
35 to 44 years
45 to 54 years
55 to 64 years
65 years and over
Economic class of farm
All
classes
100. 0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100. 0
100.0
ino. 0
100.0
100.0
ino. 0
100.0
100. 0
100. 0
100. (I
100. 0
100. 0
100. 0
100.0
100. 0
100. 0
100.0
ion. 0
100.0
ion. 0
if«. n
inn. 0
100.0
0.5
0.2
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.1
0. 1
0.1
(Z)
0.3
0. 1
0.3
0.3
0,4
0.2
0.2
2.3
0.5
2.?
3.1
2.3
2. 1
2.0
2.4
1,4
0.7
0.8
0.2
2.2
0,9
2,4
2,4
2.3
1.9
1.8
0.5
0, fi
0,4
0,5
0,6
0.2
1.0
0.2
1.0
0.9
1. 1
1. 1
0.6
4.7
2.2
5. 1
0. 1
4. S
.■(.6
2.8
2.4
1.0
2.0
3.0
2.7
2.2
1.6
III
7.7
7 3
7.4
9.5
8.8
6.8
4.2
1.8
1.6
2.4
2.4
1. 1
1. 1
4.0
l.C
3.9
5.4
4.6
3.0
1,9
11,9
6.3
11.0
13.8
13.8
10.4
6,9
2.1
9.8
9.5
7.1
4.8
4,2
IV
25,8
18,4
26.8
30.5
27.9
21.6
16,1
11,9
9,7
11,4
15,9
14,3
8.6
6.0
19. 1
13, 1
17,6
25.0
21.6
IB. 6
8,5
28.2
19.5
25.5
31.6
31.4
26,7
19.5
16.4
17.7
21.4
21.8
17.8
12.3
36.3
42.6
37.4
36.7
36.5
37.3
30.9
39,9
37.7
44.7
46.8
43.8
34.6
24.7
40.6
45.1
46.7
43.9
41.7
36.3
27.8
39.5
59.9
43.6
36.4
36.7
40,4
42,5
32.6
34.4
37.0
3.5.9
34.8
29.3
24.0
VI
27.6
30,8
25.8
20.4
24.0
32.8
46.3
45.8
52.6
41.7
34.4
38.9
55. 0
68,0
35.0
39.9
30.6
24,6
30.6
43.8
61.0
13.4
20.6
12.6
9.0
11.0
16.8
26.0
40.7
44,8
27,4
28.4
36.9
50.6
62,3
Region and age of operator
REGION VI
All age groups. ,
Under 25 years
25 to 34 years
36 to 44 years
45 to 54 years
.55 to 64 years
65 years and over
REGION VII
All age groups.
Under 25 years
26 to 34 years
36 to 44 years
45 to 54 years
55 to 64 years
66 years and over
REGION VIII
All .age groups,
lender 26 years.. .._
25 to 34 years
35 to 44 years
45 to 54 years
56 to 64 years
05 years and o-ver
REGION IX
All age groups..
Under 25 years
25 to 34 years
35 to 44 years
46 to 64 years
55 to 64 years.-
65 years and over
REGION X
All age groups..
Under 25 years
25 to 34 years
35 to 44 years
45 to 54 years
55 to 64 years.- -.
65 years and over
Economic class of farm
All
cla.sses
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100. 0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
ion. 0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100. 0
2.3
2.6
2.7
1.3
0.6
1.7
3,2
3.2
3.0
2. 1
1.4
Ifi. 6
42.5
20.5
23.0
17.7
8.6
7.9
28.5
17 4
37 3
35.0
26.5
16.4
9.5
37 6
28.8
47.4
43.5
38.6
26.8
17.9
9.7
9.3
13.1
13.9
7.6
6.9
5.8
10.0
6.8
11.4
12.5
10.7
7.7
6.2
25,6
1.9
29,8
29,5
26.2
25.3
13.1
39.6
48.6
38.6
40.6
42,6
35,0
30,2
26. 1
25.1
25.2
28.3
26.8
2.5,4
20.6
III
22,2
27.9
22.4
27.2
20,5
21,6
12,4
21,2
22, 1
26, fi
24,4
21,1
17,5
14.0
21.7
18.3
16.2
19.8
29.8
29.0
16. 1
17.7
13.0
14.4
16. 1
22.7
19.4
17.2
30. 1
13.
15
2
15
1
23
9
21
7
IV
30.0
23.3
31.2
28 6
37.5
25.7
20.7
30. 7
34.5
30.0
31.7
33.2
28.7
25.5
16.9
37.0
18.3
12.6
16.8
16.3
23.5
11.8
7.4
6.3
9.0
16.4
22.3
11.7
9. 1
9.7
9.1
12.2
14.8
17 4
22.7
32.5
24.1
23.2
18.8
23.9
25.3
25.2
24.7
22.8
22.0
23.7
30.2
29.6
14.2
9.3
11.8
12.6
15.0
16.3
16.2
5.3
3.1
3.7
3.4
6.4
5.8
4.6
3.9
3.9
6.3
7.0
12.6
13.3
7.0
6.9
4.6
12.9
20.6
35,2
10.2
10.2
6.0
6.2
8.3
13.8
23.7
5.0
9.3
1.3
6.1
4.6
3.7
11.3
0.7
1.6
0,4
0,4
1.3
3,7
1.0
2,1
Z 0,06 percent or less.
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION
41
The differences in the implications of these data for the 3
most western and 5 most eastern cotton-production regions seem
significant.
For the 10 regions used in this report from 25 to 30 percent of
farm operators are between the ages of 45 and 54. It seems reas-
onable to suppose that those in this age group would, in general,
have attained most of tlieir adjustments toward an efficient and
productive farm business. In this perspective it is interesting
to examine the distribution, among economic classes of farms, of
operators in the 45-to-54 j'ears of age group for the various regions.
In Regions I, II, III, and V from 61 to 83 percent of the opera-
tors in the age gl-oup 45 to 64 years are found on Class V and Class
VI farms. From 0.6 percent to about 3 percent of operators in
this age group are found on farms in Classes I and II in these
regions.
Region IV, "Tlie Mississippi Delta," has a substantially smaller
proportion of farm operators in this age group in the two smallest
size-of-busincss groups, and a much larger percentage are found
on Classes I and II farms. The actual percentages here are 7
and 48 percent, respectively, for the 2 largest and the 2 smallest
size-of-business groups.
For Regions VI and VII, just under one-third of the operators
between 45 and 54 years of age are found on Classes V and VI
farms, while 10 and 14 percent of the operators in this age group
in these two regions have farms that fall in the 2 largest size-of-
business groups.
In the three remaining regions strikingly larger percentages of
operators in this age group are found on Classes I and II farms.
Conversely very much smaller proportions are found on farms that
fall in the two smallest size-of-business groups.
The iiicture with respect to the age composition of all operators
of cotton farms and of the operators of farms in each of the eco-
nomic classes is shown for each region in table 22. These data
enable one to appraise, for each region, the proportionate age
distribution of farm operators in various economic classes.
For example, in Region IV, 30 percent of the operators of Class
IV farms are shown to be between 45 and 54 years of age. Opera-
tors in this age group account for 27 percent of all cotton-farm
operators in the region. This age group is, therefore, somewhat
more than proportionally represented among farms that fall
in Economic Class IV.
The proportions of the smaller size-of-business groups of farms
that are operated by persons in the older age groups is a statistic
of some interest. For it frequently is, and has in this report been,
assumed that future adjustments in resource use on cotton farms
will significantly affect the number and characteristics of farms
that are now in these economic classes.
It is interesting to observe that in Regions I through V from
about 40 to 48 percent of Class VI farms have operators who are
55 years of age or older, and that in these same regions about 23
to 30 percent of the operators of Class V farms fall in this older
age group. In each of these 5 regions, except Region IV, Classes
V and VI farms account for from about 65 to more than 85 percent
of all cotton farms. In Region IV these two smallest size-of-
business groups comprise about 53 percent of all cotton farms.
The older group of operators account for substantially higher
proportions of all operators of Classes V and VI cotton farms in
the remaining regions. From the standpoint of the regions as a
whole, however, these smaller size-of-business farms are of much
less significance in these regions.
Table 22. — Percent Distribution of Operators of Each Economic Class of Cotton Farm, by Age, by Regions: 1954
Region and age of operator
REGION I
All age groups
Under 25 years
25 to 34 years
35 to 44 years
45 to 54 years
65 to 64 years
65 years and over
REGION II
All age groups
Under 25 years
25 to 34 years
36 to 44 years
45 to 54 years„
55 to 64 years
65 years and over
REGION III
All age groups
Under 25 years
25 to 34 years
35 to 44 years
45 to 54 years_
56 to 64 years
65 years and over
REGION IV
All age groups....
Under 25 years
25 to 34 years
36 to 44 years
46 to 54 years
66 to 64 years..
65 years and over.
REGION V
All age groups....
Under 25 years
26 to 34 years
36 to 44 years
45 to 54 years
55 to 64 years
65 years and over
Economic class of farm
All
classes
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
lOOO
100.0
100,0
100.0
100.0
loao
100.0
3.1
1,2
2.9
2.2
3,6
3,5
13.0
4.7
14,3
12.5
13.5
13,4
12 2
27.7
28.3
30,3
34.0
32.9
28.0
20.6
27.8
28.4
29,7
31.4
30.0
27.9
24.3
17.3
22 2
15.3
13.1
14.5
17.7
20.7
11.1
16.4
9.2
0. 1
6.9
9,4
18.7
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
loao
100.0
2.2
9.9
1.8
9.4
2,1
11,1
2 6
9.0
13.3
8.5
25.3
27,3
23.9
33.3
33.8
29,6
19.0
27.2
27,3
27.2
36.2
32.6
30 0
23 0
21.2
40,9
29.6
13.0
15.3
18.4
25.3
14.2
4,5
6.1
9,0
7.2
8.8
21.1
100.0
100,0
loao
100.0
loao
100.0
100.0
3.0
0,9
0.8
1.6
2.5
4.0
4.2
13.9
14,7
14.2
13.4
12.8
16.0
12.1
26.0
26,6
2,5.3
35.0
34.0
28. 1
18 2
28.0
36,3
32 6
31.8
31.5
28.7
24.3
17.6
13,4
20.7
13.1
14.3
15.7
22.1
10.9
8,2
6.5
5.2
4.9
7.6
19.1
100.0
100,0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
4.5
1,0
2 1
2.4
3.1
6.8
7.0
16.1
15,2
17,2
14,9
14,6
17.8
16.2
27.0
35,6
3.5,2
31,4
30,3
24.9
18.2
27.2
26,4
27 7
31,5
30,2
25.2
22.2
lfi.9
14,8
12,9
14,7
16,0
17.3
21.2
8.3
7.0
4,9
5,1
6,8
9.0
16.2
100.0
loao
100.0
100.0
100,0
100.0
100.0
2.2
1.0
0 7
2,4
2.3
2.5
8.4
20,7
7.1
12.1
11,0
9.5
5.7
21.6
31,7
26,9
29.9
28,6
23.7
15.0
31.8
24,5
35.4
33.0
34,3
34.0
28.7
24.5
20,7
22.1
17.3
18,3
22 0
30.4
11.6
2,4
7.5
7.0
6,6
8.6
17.7
Region and age of operator
REGION VI
All age groups
Under 25 years
26 to 34 years
36 to 44 years
46 to 54 years
55 to 64 years
65 years and over
REGION VII
All age groups
Under 25 years
25 to 34 years
35 to 44 years
45 to 64 years
65 to 64 years.
65 years and over
REGION VIII
All age groups
Under 25 years
25 to 34 years
35 to 44 years
45 to 64 years
55 to 64 years
66 years and over
REGION IX
All age groups
Under 26 years
25 to 34 years
35 to 44 years
46 to 54 years
56 to 64 years
66 years and over
REGION X
All age groups
Under 26 years
26 to 34 years
36 to 44 years.-
46 to 54 years
55 to 64 years
65 years and over
Economic class of farm
All
classes
100.0
2.8
14.9
24.2
28.2
21.5
8.4
100.0
2.1
12.6
26.0
29.1
21.2
10.1
lOOO
1.2
15.3
22 9
28.6
21.4
10 6
100.0
4.7
20.9
28.9
26.7
13.2
5.6
100.0
1.9
17.0
28.9
26.9
16. 1
9.2
100.0
"li'Y
30.9
36.3
13.6
2.5
100.0
1.4
14.8
29.6
32.1
16.8
5.3
100.0
2.8
18 8
31.8
30.6
11.0
5,0
100,0
2.9
27.4
3,5,4
24.8
7.6
1.9
100. 0
1,4
21,5
33,6
27.6
11.5
4.4
100,0
2.6
20 1
34,8
22 2
16^3
5.0
100,0
1,4
14,3
31,4
31,2
16,4
6,3
100,0
0, 1
17,7
26,4
29,2
21,2
5,4
100,0
6,8
20,3
29.4
28.6
11.6
4.3
loao
1.8
16.4
31.2
27.6
15.7
7.3
III
100,0
3,6
15,0
29,7
26.2
20.9
4.7
loao
2.2
16.7
28.8
28.9
17.6
100.0
12.9
17.1
26.2
29. 5
14.3
100.0
5.2
16 9
25.8
26.6
18.7
6.8
100. 0
3 3
13.6
25.5
23.5
22.4
11.7
IV
100.0
2.1
1.5.4
23.0
35.3
18.4
5.8
100.0
2 4
12.3
25.9
31.3
19.8
8.3
100.0
2.4
16.5
17.1
28.5
20.7
14.8
100.0
6.7
16.0
18.5
24.7
22. 2
12.9
lOOO
1.6
14. 1
22.4
28.0
20.3
13.7
100.0
4.0
16.8
24.9
23.4
22.6
lOOO
2, 1
11,4
21,9
27.2
25,6
11,9
lOOO
0 7
12,7
20,4
30.2
24.6
11.4
100.0
2.8
14.7
18.7
27.3
20.6
16.0
100.0
1,5
11.2
19.2
28.9
19.2
20.0
VI
100.0
1.4
7.7
8.2
27.4
33.2
22.1
100.0
2.1
7,3
15,3
23,6
28,4
23.3
100.0
2 0
4,0
28,0
26,0
16,0
24,0
100,0
10,6
16,8
15,8
26,3
31,6
ino,o
2,8
16.7
22,2
68,3
42
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
OFF-FARM USE OF LABOR RESOURCES
Two types of data are available to indicate the extent to which
operator and family labor resources on the various economic
classes of cotton farms in the different regions are used in off-
farm employment. These data are for operators of cotton farms
classified by the days of off-farm work, and the percentage of
farms for which off-farm income of the family exceeded the value
of farm sales. The information relating to days of off-farm work
is given in table 23. And those concerning the off-farm income
of the family in relation to the value of farm sales are shown in
table 24.
Questions frequently are raised as to whether the farm families
on Classes V and VI farms represent, essentially, a welfare problem
rather than an economic problem in the organization and use of
resources.
Few of the data in this report illumine the question of whether
most of the families on Classes V and VI cotton farms represent
welfare rather than economic problems. Data concerning the
age distribution of operators are only partly applicable. These
data, however, do not indicate, for those regions where there are
appreeiaVjle numbers of these small farms, that most of them are
in the hands of the aged.
The data on off-farm work of operators, and on the proportion
of farms for which off-farm income exceeds farm sales, suggest
that most families on Classes V and VI cotton farms are primarily
dependent upon farming for their incomes.
Table 23. — Percent Distribution of Operators of Cotton Farms by Days of Work Off Farm, by Economic Class,
BY Regions: 1954
Region and days worked ofl
Economic class of farm
Region and days worked ofl
farm
Economic class of farm
farm
All
classes
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
All
classes
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
REGION I
Total.
100.0
70.1
22.9
3.1
3.9
100.0
61.0
29.7
4.0
6.3
100,0
67.0
26.1
3.4
3.4
100.0
71,8
22.1
3.1
3.0
100.0
60.2
32.2
3.7
3.8
100.0
76.3
8.0
4.2
11.6
100.0
65.2
8.7
4.3
21.7
100.0
77.8
7.8
6.3
8.0
100.0
85.8
7.8
1.9
4.4
100.0
82.8
6.6
0.9
9.8
100.0
77.0
9.9
2.6
10,4
100.0
66.7
21.1
5.6
6.7
100.0
79.0
7.7
3.9
9.4
100.0
80,4
13,4
1,8
4,5
100, 0
76,4
12.1
4.5
6.9
100,0
77,0
15.5
2.8
4.7
100.0
69.3
15.1
4.0
11.6
100.0
72.3
17.2
4.9
6.7
100.0
75.7
17.1
3,1
4,0
100.0
71.2
18.7
4.2
6.9
100.0
71.2
20.5
3.6
4.7
100.0
69.7
26.2
5.6
8.6
100.0
69.4
21.8
4.5
4,4
100.0
71.8
21.8
3.6
2.8
100.0
66.6
24.9
5.0
3.6
100.0
66.1
23.1
6.3
5.5
100.0
54.2
27.7
8.1
10.0
100.0
63.3
25.4
5.7
6.5
100.0
68.7
23.7
4.0
3.6
100.0
54,2
30.2
7.8
7.8
100.0
71.8
28.2
100.0
66.8
33.2
160.0
69.0
31.0
100.0
72.0
28.0
100.0
69.1
40.9
REGION VI
Total
100.0
67.4
23.5
3.9
6.2
100.0
62.7
25.3
6.2
6.8
100.0
72.7
8.2
4.7
14.3
100.0
72.4
17.4
4.1
6.2
100.0
66.4
15.8
4.5
13.3
100.0
80.4
9.5
7.1
3.0
100,0
77.9
11.7
2.4
8.0
100.0
82.1
6.0
3.4
8.4
lOO.O
87.0
9.5
1.2
2.3
100.0
82.5
9.7
1.9
5.9
100.0
72.4
22.1
1.6
3.9
100.0
71.4
17.4
3.9
7.3
100.0
79.2
7.2
3.4
10.2
100.0
74.2
17.4
3.3
6.1
100,0
67.5
22,3
3.2
7.0
100.0
68.3
25.1
2.8
3.8
100.0
66.6
24.1
4.2
6.2
100.0
77.7
9.2
4.4
8.8
100.0
59.6
23.6
7.3
9.6
100.0
57.9
17.2
7.8
17.1
100.0
67.7
23.4
3.8
6.2
100.0
60.8
26.2
6.5
6.5
100.0
63.8
9.9
6.6
19.8
100.0
53.6
26.3
8.6
11.7
100.0
38 1
19,4
10.3
32.2
100.0
64.6
17.1
8.3
10.2
100.0
65.5
26.2
7.4
10.8
100.0
48.6
8.4
8.4
34.3
100.0
52.6
22.6
9.1
15.8
100.0
36.3
13.7
7.5
43.5
100 0
None
lto99days..
100 to 199 days
100 to 199 days
200 days or more
200 days or more
REGION II
Total
REGION VII
None
65 7
1 to 99 days
1 to 99 days
34 3
100 to 199 days
100 to 199 days
200 days or more
200 days or more
REGION m
Total
REGION VIII
Total
100 0
None..
90.0
1 to 99 days
1 to 99 days
10 0
100 to 199 days.
200 days or more
REGION IV
Total
REGION IX
Total
100 0
None
68 4
1 to 99 days
1 to 99 days
31 6
100 to 199 days
100 to 199 days
200 days or more..
REGION V
Total....
REGION X
Total
100 0
None
81.1
1 to 99 days..
1 to 99 days
18 9
100 to 199 days
100 to 199 days
200 days or more
Table 24. — Percent of Operators of Cotton Farms With
Other Income of Family Exceeding Value of Farm
Products Sold, by Economic Class of Farm, by Regions:
1954
Economic class of farm
Region
All
classes
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
I.
6.2
9.8
6.6
3.9
7.6
6.8
9.6
12.0
6.0
11.6
6.2
8.0
8.7
6.9
1.9
2.8
2.4
5.6
3.5
1.6
2.6
2.7
7.8
14.4
8.3
2.6
4.9
3.4
4.9
4.7
3.1
6.0
4.3
6.6
12.6
6.4
3.1
7.6
6.5
6.0
6.1
9.2
14.4
5.8
5.9
13.3
6.6
3.4
6.7
6.9
10.0
22.5
16.1
32.8
6.5
11.2
19.9
10.0
6.2
17.9
14.3
18.0
35.2
24.6
63.3
15.8
II
in
rv
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
Total, 10 regions
For example, two-thirds or more of the operators of Class VI
farms in each region, except Region V, report no days of off-farm
work. In Region V, 59 percent of these operators reported no
days of off-farm work. For Class V farms about 80 percent of
the operators in all regions, except Regions VIII and X — which
have very few Class V farms — report less than 100 days of off-
farm work. Generally speaking, from two-thirds to three-fourths
of those who report less than 100 days of off-farm work did no
off-farm work at aU.
By definition, the value of farm sales for Class VI farms must
exceed the total of family income from off-farm sources. This
restriction does not, however, apply to Class V farms. In those
regions — I through VII — where Class V farms are found in con-
siderable numbers four-fifths or more of them report the value of
farm sales as exceeding total family income from other sources.
The value of farm sales on Class V farms is between $1,200 and
.$2,499. Data on the average level of sales from these farms will
be found in Part VII of this report.
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION
43
MAN-EQUIVALENT WORKERS PER COTTON FARM
The data in table 25 provides a more specific picture of the
characteristics and size of the labor resource on cotton farms.
These data indicate the average size of the labor force on cotton
farms in each economic class for each region, in terms of estimated
man-equivalents. A percentage distribution of this labor force
in terms of operators, family workers, and hired workers is also
given.
The size of the total labor force on cotton farms of various
economic classes varies by region. Generally, regions in which
mechanization of cotton production has progressed the most show
significantly smaller total lalior resources per farm than the other
regions. Among regions of the humid climatic belt, for example,
mechanization is more advanced in Regions IV' and VI than in
Regions I, 11, III, and V. In Regions I, II, III, and V, Class I
farms have an average labor force of 10 man-equivalents, while
in Regions IV and VI the labor resource on Class I farms is
smaller, about 30 and 50 percent, respectively. Similar differ-
ences, though not as great, exist among other economic classes of
farms in these two groups of regions.
Cotton production in Regions IX and X is also highly mecha-
nized. Region IX has one of the smallest inputs of the labor
resource per farm for each economic class of any region. This is
particularly striking in the instance of Class I farms.
The labor resources per farm on Class I farms in Region X may
not seem to indicate a high degree of mechanization, since the
man-equivalents used here are almost twice those indicated for
Class I farms in Region IX. Average sales of C;iass I farms in
Region X, however, are more than twice as high as sales for the
same class farms in Region IX (see table 31).
The percentage of the labor force which is comprised of operator
workers, family workers, and hired workers on different economic
classes of cotton farms is of particular interest (see table 25).
Table 25. — Total Man-Equivalent per All Commercial Farms and per Cotton Farm, and Percent Distribution in Each
Economic Class of Cotton Farm, by Type of Worker, by Regions: 1954
Region and item
REGION I
Total man-equiviilent number -
Operator percent -
Family workers percent-
Hired labor percent -
REGION II
Total man-equivalent - number-
Operator percent -
Family workers percent -
Hired labor percent -
REGION III
Total man-equivalent -- -- number.
Operator percent -
Family workers percent -
Hired labor percent -
REGION IV
Total man -equivalent - number-
Operator _ _ percent-
Family workers percent -
Hired labor percent-
REGION V
Total man-equivalent number -
Operator -percent -
Family workers - percent-
Hired Iat)or percent -
REGIOiV VI
Total man-equivalent--- --. number.
Operator - percent-
Family workers percent .
Hired labor percent -
REGION VII
Total man-equivalent ..number-
Operator percent.
Family workers percent .
Hired labor percent-
REGION VIII
Total man-equivalent number-
Operator percent-
Family workers percent-
Hired labor percent-
REOION IX
Total man-equivalent - number-
Operator - percent -
Family workers percent-
Hired labor - percent-
REGION X
Total man-equivalent number-
Operator percent-
Family workers _ percent -
Hired labor _ percent.
TOTAL, 10 REGIONS
Total man-equivalent number.
Operator percent-
Family workers percent.
Hired labor ..percent -
All
commer-
cial farms
1.6
63.6
24.0
22.4
1.3
60.1
25.0
14.9
1.5
66.4
31.4
12.2
1.8
48.6
30.9
20.5
1.3
59.0
21.7
19.3
1.7
48.9
17.8
33 3
1.6
48.4
16.7
34.9
3.3
2.3.6
5.4
71.0
1.7
48.0
15.8
36.2
2.8
20.3
8.8
64.9
1.7
49. 8
23.4
26.8
Cotton farms by economic class of farm
All classes
1.6
64.5
.30.4
15.1
1.2
66.5
27.8
6.7
1.5
S6.9
34.7
8.4
1.8
48.8
33.0
18.2
1.5
54.9
27.8
17 3
1.7
51.6
25.1
23.3
1.8
46.7
16.8
36-5
3.4
23.7
6.6
70.8
2.7
31.9
61.3
4.1
18.9
6.0
76.1
1.7
49.9
27.8
22.3
9.4
8.4
1.5
90.1
10.0
7.8
2.6
89.6
8.6
1.5
90.0
7.7
11.7
1.8
86.5
10.8
8.3
1.5
90.2
4.6
19.8
6.9
73.3
8.1
10.9
2.1
87.0
9.4
9.3
1.6
89.1
4.7
20.2
3.4
76.4
8.3
10.6
1.9
87.6
7.3
12.3
2.2
86.5
3.4
24.1
6.9
69.0
3.1
27.2
4.8
68.0
3.2
20.6
13.0
60.4
33.4
12.4
54.2
3.1
27.8
8.6
63.6
2.2
40.4
2.8
30.7
6L4
3.2
26.7
4.6
68.7
2.4
37.8
7.8
64.4
2.0
40.4
2.7
32.9
9.4
67.7
III
2.3
39.7
30.6
29.7
2.0
40. 1
25.0
34.9
2.2
39.2
37.2
23.6
2.0
43.7
35.6
20.7
2.1
42.0
25.5
32.6
1.9
47.0
24.0
29.0
1.9
40.4
15.1
38.5
2.1
39.5
8.3
62.2
1.6
48.6
12.7
38.7
1.4
50.4
16.2
33.4
2.0
43.4
28.1
28.6
IV
1.7
61.7
36.1
12.2
1.5
54.0
34.6
11.4
1.8
48.5
42.7
8.8
1.8
49.7
43.2
7.1
1.7
52.0
33.2
14.8
1.6
56.8
29.6
14.6
1.4
66.3
21.9
21.8
1.4
48.5
14.7
36.8
1.2
60.3
15.9
23 8
1.1
61.6
26.7
22.8
1.7
60.8
38.3
10.9
1.4
60.3
33.3
6.4
1.3
63 3
31.6
5.1
1.4
68.5
37.5
4.0
1.6
68.6
38.4
3.1
1.4
68.8
35.1
6.1
1.3
60.2
32.9
1.2
61.9
26.4
11.7
1.1
66.9
21.9
21.2
1.0
67.2
21.7
11.1
0.9
56.2
31.8
12.0
1.4
59.4
35.9
4.7
1.2
70.0
27.6
2.6
1.1
76.1
23.0
1.9
1.2
70.9
27.3
1.8
1.3
70.1
28.6
13
1.2
70.7
27.5
1.8
L2
69.9
27.3
2.8
1.2
70.8
24.8
4 4
1.2
68.1
23.7
8.2
1.1
63.9
33.6
2.5
1.0
70.0
26.2
3.8
1.2
71.2
26.9
L9
44
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
On Class I cotton farms in the various regions operator and
family labor account for from about 10 to 20 percent of the total
labor resources used per farm. The percentage of total labor
resources supplied by operator and family workers is, however,
generally higher in those regions in which it has been most eco-
nomically feasible to mechanize cotton harvesting. Mechanized
harvesting has, in general, been found most feasible in Regions IV,
VI, IX, and X. For Class I farms in Region X this tendency is
obscured somewhat by the fact that the average size of business
for Class I farms in this region is far greater than for any other
region.
On Class II farms the proportion of total labor resources ac-
counted for by hired labor varies from a low of just under one-half
in Regions VI and X to a high of a little over two-thirds. The
highest percentages of the labor resources accounted for by hired
labor on this class of farm are found in Regions I, II, and VIII.
This same general regional relationship between the degree of
mechanization and the percentage of the labor resources accounted
for by hired labor is found on Class III farms. The overall per-
centages are significantly lower, ranging from a low of about 20
percent to a high of slightly over 50 percent of the total labor
resources accounted for by hired labor.
For some regions, such as Regions VII, VIII, IX, and X, even
Class IV farms hire a rather substantial proportion of all labor
used. In general, however, cotton farms in Economic Classes IV
through VI hire very little labor.
Data in table 26 show the percentage distribution of farms in
each economic class for each region by designated ranges of total
expenditure for hired labor. These data indicate that many of
the larger farms are operated primarily with operator and family
labor. For example, a considerable percentage of the Class II
farms, especially in the more mechanized areas hire relatively
small amounts of labor.
Table 26. — Percent Distribution of Farms Reporting Specified Expenditures for Hired Labor for Cotton Farms, by
Economic Class of Farm, by Regions: 1954
Item
REGION I
Farms with a dollar expenditure of—
Total
1 to 499
600 to 999
1,000 to 2,499
2,500 to 4,999
6,000 to 9,999
10,000 to 19,999
20,000 and over
REGION U
Farms with a dollar expenditure of—
Total
1 to 499
500 to 999
1,000 to 2,499
2,500 to 4,999
6,000 to 9,999---
10,000 to 19,999
20,000 and over
REGION III
Farms with a dollar expenditure of—
Total
1 to 499
600 to 999
1,000 to 2,499.--
2,600 to 4,999 -..
6,000 to 9,999 ,
10,000 to 19,999-
20,000 and over---
REGION IV
Farms with a dollar expenditure of—
Total -
1 to 499
600 to 999-.-
1,000 to 2,499
2,500 to 4,999
6,000 to 9,999- --
10,000 to 19,999
20,000 and over
REGION V
Farms with a dollar expenditure of—
Total
1 to 499
600 to 999
1,000 to 2,499
2,500 to 4,999-
6,000 to 9,999-
10,000 to 19,999-
20,000 and over
Economic class of farm
All
classes
100.0
79.6
10.6
6.4
2.0
1.0
0.3
0.1
100.0
91.1
6.4
2.6
0.7
0.3
(Z)
(Z
100.0
87.6
7.3
3.6
0.9
0.4
0.2
0.1
100.0
67.0
12.6
11.4
4.6
2.5
1.4
0.7
100.0
73.5
12.7
8.6
3.1
1.3
0.6
0.4
100.0
0.3
2.8
12.1
39.8
33.7
11.3
4.3
8.7
34.8
26.1
26.1
100.0
2.4
0.6
8.6
10.6
31.9
31.4
14.6
100.0
0.7
1.8
6.5
15.7
28.6
29,7
17.0
100.0
0.6
0.9
7.0
10.3
33.7
23.8
23.8
100.0
6.1
7.6
30.7
35.0
17.8
2.9
100.0
5.9
8.8
28.2
34.7
20.6
1.8
100.0
10.4
10.9
30.8
32.4
13.4
2.1
100.0
10.9
10.1
28,6
32.7
16.0
1.7-
(Z)
100.0
4.0
6,4
31.8
39,3
16.8
1,7
III
100.0
33.9
23.9
34.2
6.6
1.4
100.0
28,2
27,5
35.1
8,3
0.9
100.0
36.6
28.7
30,1
3.9
0.7
0.1
100.0
36.9
19.0
37,0
6,8
0,3
(Z)
IV
100.0
74.4
19.5
5.7
0.4
100.0
93.7
5.4
0.9
100.0
78.5
16.3
4.6
0.4
0.2
100.0
78.5
17.2
4.1
0.2
(Z)
(Z)
100,0
68.8
22.7
8.1
0.4
(Z)
100.0
20,6
25.2
43 3
10.3
0.6
100.0
68.7
30.2
10.3
0.8
100.0
95.6
3.6
0.7
0.1
100,0
96.9
2.8
0.3
(Z)
100.0
94.0
6.1
0.8
0.1
(Z)
100.0
91.1
8.0
0.8
0.1
VI
1.2
0.1
0.1
(Z)
100.0
99.4
0.5
0.1
100.0
99.7
0.3
(Z)
(Z)
100.0
99.3
0.6
0.1
100.0
99.0
1.0
(Z)
REGION VI
Farms with a dollar expenditure of —
Total
1 to 499
500 to 999
1,000 to 2,499 ,
2,600 to 4,999 ,
6,000 to 9,999 ,
10,000 to 19,999 ,
20,000 and over ,
REGION VII
Farms with a dollar expenditure of—
Total
1 to 499-
600 to 999
1,000 to 2,499
2,600 to 4,999
6,000 to 9,999
10,000 to 19,999
20,000 and over
REGION VIII
Farms with a dollar expenditure of—
Tot.ll
1 to 499---
600 to 999..--
1,000 to 2,499.--
2,600 to 4,999
6,000 to 9,999
10,000 to 19,999
20,000 and over
REGION IX
Farms with a dollar expenditure of—
Total ,
1 to 499..-
600 to 999
1,000 to 2,499
2,600 to 4,999
6,000 to 9,999
10,000 to 19,999
20,000 and over
REGION X
Farms with a dollar expenditure of —
Total
1 to 499---
500 to 999 -.,
1,000 to 2,499 --,
2,600 to 4,999 --.,
6,000 to 9,999
10,000 to 19,999
20,000 and over.- --,
Economic class of farm
AU
classes
100,0
47.7
22,0
22.0
6.3
1.6
0,3
0.2
100.0
43.5
23.3
21.9
7.5
2.5
1.0
0.3
100.0
19.5
14.1
25.2
17.9
12.8
6.8
3.7
100,0
14,7
12.3
29.3
23.1
14.6
6.1
0.9
100.0
15.1
11.8
21.0
16,7
14.2
10.8
10.5
100,0
0.6
10.2
9.6
26.1
33.1
11.5
100.0
0.2
3.0
6.0
13.6
37.9
29,0
10.3
100.0
0.5
1.1
6,6
5,8
33.0
33 0
20,0
100.0
2.3
3.2
14.5
22.7
38.0
16,4
2.9
100.0
1.3
1.2
7.8
13.8
24.2
25.6
26. 1
100.0
8.6
16,0
35,0
34.3
6.1
100,0
6.0
5,2
30.3
46,1
11.4
1,0
(Z)
100.0
1.6
2.3
27.1
43.2
23.6
2.2
100,0
9,6
9,6
36,8
36.7
7.2
0.2
100-0
11.8
10.3
27.8
33 0
16,8
1.3
III
100.0
17.0
20.7
56.1
7.2
100. 0
16,7
19.2
56.4
7.3
0.3
0.1
100.0
7.6
12.1
55.6
22.5
1.8
0.4
100.0
16.8
21.5
62,6
8-8
0.3
100. 0
19.7
18,8
46,2
13,9
1.4
IV
100.0
60.7
36,2
12.8
0.3
100.0
40.0
46.4
14.3
0.3
100.0
23.9
60.3
20,3
3,1
1.8
0.6
100.0
41.5
39-5
18-4
0-2
0.4
100 0
37.2
36,3
24.5
1.6
0.4
100,0
84,2
16,4
0.4
100.0
83.2
14.7
2.1
100.0
77.6
13.2
8.5
0.8
100-0
84.7
12.7
2.6
100.0
68.9
27.3
3.8
VI
100.0
98.3
1.7
100,0
97.2
1.4
1.4
11.1
100.0
80.0
20.0
100.0
88.2
11.8
Z 0.05 percent or less.
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION
45
TOTAL CROPLAND AND COTTON ACRES PER MAN-
EQUIVALENT
Most of the information relating to measures of the relative
efficiency with which resources are used on the various economic
classes of farms is presented in Section 7. But data concerning
the acres of cropland and of cotton harvested per man-equivalent
are available in table 27.
In one region (Region IX) there are some special circumstances,
which will be noted, but generally speaking, the acreage of crop-
land harvested per man-equivalent on farms of different economic
classes, for a given region, is indicative of the relative efficiency
with which the labor resource is used on the various size-of-
business groups of farms.
Except for Region IX, there is a steady and substantial increase
in cropland harvested per man-equivalent from Class VI tlirough
Class II farms for all regions. In Region IX, Class III farms
have more cropland harvested per nuxn-equivalent than do farms
in Class 11.
The extent as well as the fact of increased cropland harvested
per unit of labor as between Class VI and Class II farms should
be noted. For most regions, Class II farms have about 4 times
as much cropland harvested per man-equivalent as do those farms
in Economic Class VI. Even between Class III and Class II
farms there is, for nearly all regions, a striking increase in crop-
land per man-equivalent. In 7 of the 10 regions. Class II farms
have about 40 percent more acres of cropland per unit of labor
than farms in Class III. In Region II, this difference between
these two classes is about 38 percent. The differences in cropland
acreage per man between classes within these regions seem large
enough to suggest that labor is utilized more effectively on larger
farms, up to those in Economic Class II.
In Region VII only about 10 percent more cropland is harvested
per man on Class II than on Class III farms. Special circum-
stances, which are discussed later, prevail in Region IX.
While Class I farms are indicated to have much more cropland
harvested per worker, in most regions, than do farms in Classes
III through VI, there are several regions in which Class II farms
indicate more cropland per worker than do those in the largest
size-of-business group. This situation is shown to exist in Regions
II, III, V, and VII. In Region IX, the acreage of cropland
harvested per worker is practically the same for farms in Classes
I and II. In the other five regions the acreage of cropland har-
vested per worker is higher on Class I than on Class II farms.
In the instance of Region IX, the High Plains of Texas, special
circumstances require that the data of table 27 be carefully in-
terpreted. Although in this region there is considerable irri-
gated land, only on Class I farms does there appear to be enough
irrigated land for all cotton to be grown under irrigation. The
proportions that irrigated land accoimt for of cotton acreage per
farm for other economic cla.sses decline rapidly from about 70
percent for Class II, to 25 percent for Class III, and to insignificant
percentages for Classes IV through VI. Region IX has a semiarid
climate which, in general, means that, in relatively frequent years,
there is too little rainfall for good yields. The average yields for
nonirrigated crops are, therefore, much lower than for those grown
under irrigation. At the same time, both terrain and the period of
its development for crop farming favor large-scale mechanized
farming units in Region IX. These latter conditions, taken in
conjunction with the lack of irrigated land and consequent rela-
tively low output per acre, seem to explain the fact that Classes
III and IV farms have larger acreages of cropland per worker in
Region IX than do farms in Classes I and II.
Table 27- — Acres of Cropland Harvested and Acres of
Cotton Harvested per Man-Equivalent for Cotton
Farms, by Economic Class, and by Regions: 1954
Region
I...
II...
III..
IV..
V...
VI..
VII.
VIII
IX..
X...
I.-..
II...
III.-
IV..
V...
VI..
vn.
VIII
IX..
X .-
Economic class of farm
classes
III IV
Acres of cropland harvested
31.9
25.8
20.7
26.1
33.3
36.6
80,6
40.9
120.0
65.4
80.1
74.1
43.9
32.9
27.1
68.3
71.3
52.0
33.3
23.8
57.7
60.3
35,0
23,3
18.6
78.4
03.0
34,6
17,8
11.3
62.7
70.3
51.0
36.5
25.7
84.1
68.2
42.1
26.9
22.3
82.7
112.1
99.5
80,0
57,5
49.1
43.8
32,9
27,1
18.2
118 1
117.1
132.5
119.2
101 0
61.8
42.0
28.6
18.2
13.3
18.3
17.3
13.3
8.6
17.5
14.2
32.6
10.0
38.2
6.0
Acres of cotton harvested
10.0
23,9
21.8
14.3
11.2
8,6
10.0
21,9
26.8
19,6
14.7
10.0
8.7
21,1
21.9
14,6
10,0
7.9
12. H
30,6
25.6
17.0
10,6
7.3
17 3
30.3
33.9
27.1
20.0
14.3
18,8
44.6
38,2
21.6
13.8
10,0
39,4
36,9
64,6
60.0
40.7
29.2
23,5
27,3
25,0
21.0
16.7
11.8
53,3
61.3
63,3
60.6
52.5
47.0
26,3
28,7
22.5
16,4
12.7
8.9
5.8
6.4
6.0
6.4
8.3
6,8
15.8
6.7
16.6
6.0
46
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
Section 6.— INVESTMENT ON COTTON FARMS
Information concerning total farm investments and its distribu-
tion by major categories is particularly useful. Through the
common denominator of estimated dollar value, such data provide
the best measure of the quantity of the various kinds and qualities
of physical resources that are used in production on cotton farms.
Investment data are available to us for three major categories of
resources — land and buildings, machinery and equipment, and
livestock.
The land and capital resources on these farms are employed for
other purposes as well as in cotton production, of course, but, as
table 19 shows, the cotton enterprise accounts for an overwhelm-
ingly large proportion of total sales from cotton farms in every
region, on each economic class of farm. The continued employ-
ment of these resources is, consequently, mainly supported by the
cotton enterprise.
The approximately 8.4 biUion dollars of investment on cotton
farms in our ten regions is an impressive aggregate of resources.
It amounts to about 8 percent of the estimated total investment on
commercial farms in the United States.
REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF TOTAL INVESTMENT
AMONG ECONOMIC CLASSES
In this perspective let us examine the distribution of total
investment for the ten regions among farms with total annual
gross sales of less than $5,000. It seems probable that among such
businesses are likely to occur most of the difficulties of remunerat-
ing at "opportunity costs" both the resources which comprise the
investment aggregate and the human agent of operator and family
labor and management.
With respect to this distribution three groups of regions are
clearly discernible. In Regions I, II, III, and V, from just under
60 percent to almost 90 percent of total investment is found on
farms in Classes IV through VI. A much smaller, but still sub-
stantial, proportion of around 35 percent of total investment is
found in Regions IV, VI, and VII on farms with gross sales of less
than $5,000. In Regions VIII, IX, and X these smaller size-of-
business farms account for 9, 5, and 3 percent, respectively, of
regional total investment.
Table 28. — Distribution of Investment on Cotton Farms, by Economic Class, by Regions: 1954
Region and item
REGION I
Total investment
Land and buildings
Machinery and equipment-.
Livestoct
REGION II
Total investment
Land and buildings
Machinery and equipment.-.
Livestock
REGION III
Total investment
Land and buildings
Machinery and equipment...
Livestock
REGION IV
Total investment
Land and buildings
Machinery and equipment..
Livestock
REGION V
Total investment
Land and buildings
Machinery and equipment...
Livestock
REGION VI
Total investment
Land and buildings
Machinery and equipment...
Livestock
All
cotton
farms
Mil.
dollars
428.5
347.7
50.7
30.0
232.8
188.8
29.7
14.3
1, 163. 2
944.1
126.2
82.9
1,717.7
1. 369. 8
306.1
51.8
248.6
196.6
30.4
21.4
182.6
154.4
20.2
8.0
Economic class of farm
Per-
cent
8.3
8.3
9.4
6.1
1.2
1.1
1.4
1.8
6.4
6.6
6.0
4.6
32.7
33.5
29.9
27.1
16.8
17.8
12.7
13.3
13.2
13,6
11.2
11.1
Per-
cent
13.2
13.7
11.5
10.8
3.8
3.8
3.7
3.9
8.4
8.9
6.2
6.3
18.6
18.1
21.9
12.5
11.9
11.9
13.4
9.4
25.9
25.9
28.2
20.6
Per-
cent
16.3
16.3
17.6
14.4
7.3
6.4
11.4
11.4
12.0
9.7
16.4
16.8
15.0
13.7
14,9
15.3
13.1
13.0
26.8
25,9
26.7
22.9
Per-
cent
26.4
26.4
26.8
26.9
19.3
19.6
18.2
17.4
24.8
24.9
25.2
23.4
16.9
16.4
18.2
21.2
18.4
17.8
21.9
18.9
21.0
20.9
21.5
22.4
Per-
cent
24.4
24.0
25.2
27.1
39.2
38.8
41.8
38.3
31.7
31.0
36.3
33.9
12.7
12.3
12.9
19.7
21.0
20.4
22.7
23.6
10.8
10.6
16.2
VI
Per-
cent
11.4
11.3
10.4
14.7
29.7
29.8
27.6
32.2
17.3
17.1
15.4
22.1
2.8
2.9
2.1
6.8
17.1
16.7
16,2
21.9
3.3
3.1
3.6
6.8
Region and item
REGION VII
Total investment
Land and buildings
Machinery and equipment.
Livestock
REGION VIII
Total investment
Land and buildings
Machinery and equipment.
Livestock
REGION IX
Total investment
Land and buildings
Machinery and equipment.
Livestock
REGION X
Total investment
Land and buildings
Machmery and equipment.
Livestock
TOTAL, 10 REGIONS
Total investment
Land and buildings
Machinery and equipment.
Livestock
All
cotton
farms
MU.
dollars
1. 387. 6
1,191.0
152.2
44.4
384.4
342.1
37.8
4.6
1, 130. 4
991.7
125.6
13.2
1, 667. 9
1,328.6
198.1
31.3
8, 423. 7
7, 044. 9
1,076.9
301.9
Economic class of farm
.Per-
cent
15.3
16.0
12.0
8.7
66.6
66.6
45.9
68.7
64.8
66,0
46.0
44.4
79,7
81,0
70,9
79.5
36.9
37.2
32.0
20.2
Per-
cent
23.1
23.1
24.5
17.7
23.8
23.1
30.8
21.3
32.8
31.9
40.4
32.3
13.2
12.2
20.0
13.2
18.4
18.2
21.4
12.0
III
Per-
cent
25.9
26.2
23.8
25.3
11.3
11.1
12.2
12.8
7.6
7.6
7.9
12.0
4.5
4.3
6.4
4.8
13.5
13.6
13.2
13.2
IV
Per-
cent
22.0
21.4
26.1
26.2
S. 6
6.3
7.6
3.5
3.4
3.2
4.2
7.4
2.0
1.8
2.8
2.1
14.4
14.0
15.7
20.0
Per-
cent
11.0
10.7
11.6
17.1
3.1
3.1
2.7
2.7
1.3
1.3
1.4
3.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.4
12.3
11.8
13.0
22,1
VI )
Per-
cent
2.7
2.6
3.2
6.0
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.9
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
5.4
6.2
4.7
12,6
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION
47
INVESTMENT PER FARM
Aggregate investment data for regions and economic classes of
cotton farms are useful, but information on average investment per
farm for economic classes and regions is perhaps of more wide-
spread interest, and is valuable for several uses. The data on per
farm investment are given in table 29. Such data measure more
completely than any other available data the relative quantities of
physical resources that are used in production on cotton farms of
different economic classes in the various regions. They also
suggest, at the readily compreliensible level of the individual farm,
the quantities of other resources that are used in conjunction with
human resources.
Class I farms in all regions have average investments well in
excess of $100,000, but there is considerable variation in the
average level of investment among regions. The Class I farms in
Region X have far larger total investment than do those of any
other region.
Total investment in Class II farms shows considerably less
regional variation. The range here is from a low of about $45,000
in Region I to a little over $70,000 in Region VII. Considerable
regional variation will be observed in total investment per farm for
Classes III through VI. The general level decreases from Class
III to Class VI. Among Class III farms the range is from about
$16,000 for Region I to almost $.38,000 in Regions VII and VIII.
Class IV farms exhibit a range in total investment of from about
$8,000 to more than $26,000. Investment per farm for Class V
farms varies from a low of a little more than $4,000 in Region IV
to a high of almost $20,000 in Region IX. Class VI farms show a
range in investment per farm from about $3,000 to $12,000.
Table 29 also shows the percentage distribution of investment
among land and buildings, machinery and equipment, and live-
stock. Land and buildings account for 75 percent or more of total
investment for every region and every economic class of farm.
Moreover, there is striking similarity for the different economic
classes in each of the ten regions in the percentage of total invest-
ment which is accounted for by each of the tliree major investment
components.
Table 29. — Total Investment and Percent Distribution of Investment per Farm for Cotton Farms, by Economic Class, by
Regions: 1954
Region and item
REGION I
Total investment - .dollars-
Land and buildings percent-
Machinery and equipment .percent-
Livestock percent.
REGION II
Total investment dollars.
Land and buildings percent-
Machinery and equipment percent-
Livestock percent-
REQION III
Total investment dollars.
Land and buildings percent-
Machinery and equipment percent-
Livestock pereent-
REQION IV
Total investment dollars.
Land and buildings percent.
Machinery and equipment percent.
Livestock percent.
REGION V
Total investment dollars.
Land and buildings percent.
Machinery and equipment percent.
Livestock percent.
REGION VI
Total investment doUars.
Land and buildings percent-
Machinery and equipment percent.
Livestock percent.
REGION VII
Total Investment. dollars.
Land and buildings percent.
Machinery and equipment percent.
Livestock percent.
REGION VIII
Total investment dollars-
Land and buildings percent.
Machinery and equipment percent.
Livestock percent.
REGION IX
Total investment dollars.
Land and buildings percent.
Machinery and equipment percent.
Livestock _ percent.
REGION X
Total investment doUars.
Land and buildings percent -
Machinery and equipment _ percent.
Livestock pereent.
TOTAL, 10 REGIONS
Total Investment -dollars.
Land and buildings percent.
Machinery and equipment percent.
Livestock ...percent.
Economic class of farm
All classes
7,469
81.2
11.8
7.0
6,781
81.1
12.8
6.1
6,737
81.9
10.9
7.2
13,416
79.2
17.8
3.0
11,167
79.1
12.3
8.6
22, 843
84.6
11.1
4.4
30, 872
85.8
11.0
3.2
72, 638
89.0
77, 159
87.7
11.1
1.2
131, 386
85.3
12.7
2.0
16, 718
83.6
12.8
3.6
123, 774
81.4
13.4
6.2
119,347
76.3
16.3
9.4
154, 708
84,6
10.4
5,1
187, 621
81.2
16.3
2.6
194,311
84.0
9.2
6.8
143, 470
9.4
3,7
178, 125
89.6
8.6
1,8
233, 985
90.7
8. 1
1.2
147, 607
89.7
9.3
1.0
276, 743
86.7
11.3
2.0
202, 214
86.6
11.4
2,0
45, 887
83.9
10.3
5.8
49, 141
81.3
12,4
6.3
8, 173
86.7
8.0
5.3
53,685
77.0
21.0
2,0
53, 606
79.4
13.8
6.8
61,210
84.6
12.0
3.6
72, 053
85.9
11.6
2.5
70, 106
86.3
12.7
1.0
64,005
85,2
13.7
1.2
67, 270
78.8
19.2
2,0
61, 984
82,8
14.9
2.3
III
15, 867
81.0
12,8
6,2
21, 350
80.6
13.7
5.7
19, 052
82.4
11.6
6. 1
18, 669
81.2
16.3
2.6
24, 282
81.7
10 8
7.5
26,511
85. 1
11.0
3.9
37, 942
86.8
10,1
3.1
37, 882
88,0
10,7
1.3
36, 584
86.6
11.6
1.9
34, 363
82.6
16.3
2, 1
25, 126
84.0
12.6
3.6
7,614
81.3
11,6
7. 1
9,346
82.4
12.0
5.6
8,746
82.1
11.1
6.8
8,081
77.0
19.2
3.8
12, 459
76.6
14.6
16, 027
84.0
11.3
4,7
22, 096
83.7
12.5
3.8
23,177
85.7
13.6
0.8
26, 399
83.6
13.8
2.6
22, 149
79.7
18.1
2.2
10, 846
81.1
13.9
6,0
.5, 017
80 0
12.2
7,8
6,692
80.4
13.6
6.0
6,239
80.1
12.2
7.7
4,271
77.2
18.1
4.7
7,247
77.0
13.3
9.7
10, 820
83.3
10.0
6.7
13, 432
83.6
11.4
6.0
15, 586
90 3
8 7
1.0
19, 644
85. 1
11.9
3.0
12, 032
80.3
18.1
1.6
5,764
80 1
13.5
6.4
3,104
80.2
10.8
9.0
3,739
81.6
11.8
6.7
3,343
81.1
9.7
9.2
2,802
80.6
13.3
6,2
4,659
77.3
11.6
11.1
78.8
12.1
9.1
8,106
81.3
12.8
6.9
10, 989
89.1
9.6
1.4
12,060
82.2
13.6
4.3
7,873
81,0
17.9
1.1
3,617
80.7
11.0
8.3
48
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
INVESTMENT PER ACRE AND PER MAN-EQUIVALENT
The investment data per farm of table 29 were divided by acres
of all land, acres of cropland, and number of man-equivalent
workers per farm, to obtain the investment measures per farm
shown in table 30.
Perhaps the most significant economic measure of those shown
in table 30 is investment per man-equivalent worker. This meas-
ure provides an index of the relationship of other productive re-
sources to the human resources used on these farms.
In general there is a steady and substantial increase in invest-
ment per worker from Class VI to Class I farms for all regions.
For the 10 regions, taken as a whole, the average investment per
worker on Class VI farms is about $3,000, the comparable average
for Class I farms is almost $28,000. Examination of the data in
table 30 for individual regions reveals some striking differences
between regions for the same economic classes of farms. In gen-
eral, it will be observed that investment per worker is much lower
for each economic class of farm in Regions I though V than in
Regions VI through X. It is interesting to note that in several of
the western regions average investment per worker is higher on
Classes IV and V farms than such investment on Classes I and II
farms in some of the eastern regions.
Table 30. — Total Investment per Acre of All Land in Farms, per Acre of Total Cropland, and per Man-Equivalent,
FOR Cotton Farms, by Economic Class, by Regions: 1954
Economic class of farm
Region and item
All classes
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
REGION I
Dollars
Dollars
Dollars
Dollars
Dollars
Dollars
Dollars
Investment per acre of—
71
122
4,6f58
68
131
13, 167
74
146
13, 496
78
133
6,899
76
119
4,479
68
111
3,684
60
109
2,687
REGION U
Investment per acre of —
72
145
4,818
65
124
11, 936
68
160
16,852
72
142
10, 676
83
147
6,230
76
146
4,379
64
143
3,399
REGION HI
Investment per acre of—
83
167
4,491
99
196
16, 627
106
210
18, 179
97
182
8,660
92
164
4,868
80
160
3,742
63
160
2,786
REGION IV
Investment per acre of—
178
246
7,453
189
269
24,366
206
206
19,883
183
242
9,336
167
224
4,489
165
211
2,847
111
188
2,165
REGION V
Investment per acre of—
76
150
7,445
104
198
17, 992
94
170
17,260
79
165
11,563
76
143
7,329
69
134
6,176
68
126
3,883
REGION VI
Investment per acie of —
194
312
13,437
178
290
31, 189
204
336
27,823
196
291
13, 953
216
329
10,017
179
323
8,323
P?
266
4,742
REGION VII
Investment per acre of—
123
174
17, 151
162
232
21,991
135
189
25, 733
118
164
19,969
114
158
16,783
106
156
11, 193
90
166
6,765
REGION VIII
Investment per acre of—
341
418
21,336
330
417
24, 892
342
402
21,908
362
418
18,039
386
476
16, 565
398
604
14, 169
364
416
9, 15S
region IX
Investment per acre of —
All land in larms - -
170
216
28,577
193
246
31,406
173
208
26,669
112
161
22,866
106
168
21,999
88
143
19,644
62
186
10,964
REGION X
Investment per acre ot—
All land in farms -
242
444
32, 046
228
414
33,222
310
597
33,635
323
643
24, M6
317
790
20, 135
497
718
13, 369
824
1,028
Investment per man-equivalent - -
7,873
TOTAL, 10 REGIONS
Investment per acre of —
All land In farms -
135
217
9,834
196
302
27, 701
165
241
22,967
129
194
12,663
112
174
6,380
92
161
4,117
68
146
Investment per man.equIvaleDt
3,014
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION
Section 7.— SELECTED MEASURES OF FARM INCOME AND EFFICIENCY
49
In this section two additional sets of basic data are presented
for economic classes of cotton farms in the ten regions. These are
the value of sales per farm, and per farm amounts of expenditure
for a number of items of cash-production expense. The per farm
totals of these designated items of cash-production expenses are
referred to as "specified expenses."
The basic data on average .sales per farm are shown in table 31 ;
those concerning designated items of expense are given in table 32.
The data relating to average sales per farm probably provide the
best available measure of both the absolute and the relative sizes
of farm business that are found on the various economic classes of
cotton farms.
In recent years concern has been expressed in some quarters
about the fact of secularly increasing size-of-farm businesses.
This report is not, of course, designed to analyze the complex re-
lationships between social goals and necessary economic adjust-
ments on farms that are involved in questions relating to trends
in size-of-farm businesses. An examination of the average levels
of total sales on the three largest size-of-business groups of cotton
farms does, however, provide an objective measure of the size of
these largest cotton farms.
Class I farms include all those with sales of $25,000 or more.
Except for Region X where the average is $110,000, the farms in
this class have average total sales of from $40,000 to $60,000.
Table 31. — Total Sales, Cotton Sales, All Crop Sales, and Livestock and Livestock Products Sales per Cotton Farm,
Economic Class, and by Regions: 1954
Region and item
REGIO.V I
Total sales
All crops-- - -.
Cotton - --
All livestock and livestock products
REQIOX H
Total sales ---
All crops
Cotton -.
All livestock and livestock products- -
REGION III
Total sales
All crops _ --.
Cotton —
All livestock and livestock products
REGION IV
Total sales —
All crops _
Cotton
All livestock and livestock products
REGION V
Total sales
All crops —
Cotton
A 11 livestock and livestock products
REOIO.X VI
Total sales
All crops _.- _.
Cotton
All livestock and livestock products -..
REGION VII
Total sales
All crops
Cotton
All livestock and livestock products
REGION VIII
Total sales
All crops _
Cotton
All livestock and livestock products
REGION IX
Total sales :..
All crops
Cotton
All livestock and livestock products
REGION X
Total sales
All crops
Cotton
All livestock and livestock products
Economic class of farm
.\U classes
Dollars
2, 701
2.657
2.026
193
1,666
1,543
1,390
101
2,142
1,966
1,837
168
4, 6.W
4,405
3,957
161
2,758
2,464
2,288
285
6,380
5.038
4.517
341
5,967
5,474
4.491
492
16,920
16,440
13. 751
479
21,812
21, 210
17,188
602
47,880
45,799
36, 516
2,080
Dollars
42,084
37, 676
29,902
3.958
48.196
36,822
29,252
8,565
m. 842
44,906
38, 936
5,663
57, 071
64,336
45, 309
2,677
fjO, 316
63,626
48, 899
6,650
39, 893
37,468
31,215
2,432
52, 696
50,747
37, 622
1,943
59,207
57, 2fi0
46,999
1,944
46, 675
45,600
36,248
1,075
110,441
105, 776
83,368
4,664
Dollars
14,349
12, 659
9,830
1.602
14,354
12, 656
10, 6.53
1,559
14, 397
12, 766
11,367
1.688
14,643
14, 118
12, 167
615
14, 167
12,684
11.398
1,449
14,385
13,668
12, 276
822
14, 473
13,418
10,996
1.064
16, 670
16, 337
13, 967
333
16, 962
16, 472
13,660
490
15,996
16, 192
12,903
802
Dollars
6,479
6,995
4,628
461
6,839
6,041
6,016
726
6,396
6,764
5,348
606
6,693
6,498
5.891
192
6,573
6,924
6.609
630
6,831
6,430
5,938
399
6,908
6, 266
5,286
641
7,826
7,632
6,577
194
7,723
7,365
6,313
368
,192
,765
Dollars
3,412
3.206
2,602
198
3,290
3,062
2.731
203
3,317
3.068
2.868
248
3,379
3,292
3,118
84
3,369
3,003
2.842
349
3,663
3,419
3.047
■Hi
3,613
3,203
2.766
410
3.513
3,432
2.997
81
3,976
3,666
3,166
319
3,921
3,696
3,352
218
Dollars
1,770
1, 653
1,364
113
1,732
1,635
1,492
86
1,729
1,606
1,622
117
1,769
1,731
1,674
1,706
1,527
1.462
171
1,894
1,729
1,651
165
1,916
1,660
1,472
265
1,918
1,878
1,668
39
1,%9
1,761
1,566
207
1,880
1,837
1,753
43
VI
Dollars
796
750
647
42
776
734
683
37
757
703
670
50
774
753
22
658
582
534
71
787
704
673
83
840
735
673
106
835
827
783
7
721
617
578
105
868
854
847
6
50
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
It will be remembered that the range of sales volume possible
for farms in Class II is from $10,000 to $24,999. The midpoint of
such a range is $17,500. In no region does average sales per farm
for Class II farms go as high as the midpoint of the range for the
class. In most regions, sales for_this class average from $14,000
to $15,000 per farm.
For Class III farms the most general level of average sales found
in the regions is about $6,500. The possible range of sales in this
class is, of course, from $5,000 to $9,999. Only in Regions VIII
and IX, where average sales are $7,800 and $7,700, respectively,
does total farm sales of Class III farms reach the midpoint of the
sales range for the class.
It seems doubtful that sales volumes such as the averages for
farms in these classes would, in the instance of any type of non-
farm business, be taken to connote unusually large or economi-
cally menacing size.
In this general context it is also important to look at per farm
sales on the three smallest economic classes from the standpoint
of the adequacy of business volume to supply generally acceptable
levels of income to a farm family.
The range among regions for average sales per Class IV cotton
farms is from almost $3,300 to almost $4,000. For Class V farms
the comparable range is from about $1,730 to $1,970, while the
range in region-average total sales for Class VI cotton farms is
from about $660 to about $860.
Table 32. — Percent of Farms Reporting and Average Expenditure for Selected Items per Farm, for Cotton Farms, by Economic
Class, by Regions: 1954
Region and Item
REGION I
Machine hire:
Percent of farms reporting..
Dollars per farm reporting, _
Hired labor:
Percent of farms reporting. _
Dollars per farm reporting..
Feed for livestock and poultry:
Percent of farms reporting..
Dollars per farm reporting. .
Gasoline, fuel, and oil:
Percent of farms reporting..
Dollars per farm reporting..
Fertilizer and fertilizer material:
Percent of farms reporting.,.
Dollars per farm reporting...
Lime and liming material:
Percent of farms reporting,,.
Dollars per farm reporting...
Average of specified expenses per farm
dollars..
REGION II
Machine hire:
Percent of farms reporting.
Dollars per farm reporting.
Hired labor:
Percent of farms reporting.
Dollars per farm reporting.
Feed for livestock and poultry:
Percent of farms reporting...
Dollars per farm reporting...
Gasoline, fuel, and oil:
Percent of farms reporting...
Dollars per farm reporting...
Fertilizer and fertilizer material:
Percent of farms reporting...
Dollars per farm reporting. . ,
Lime and liming material:
Percent of farms reporting...
Dollars per farm reporting...
Average of specified expenses per farm
dollars..
REGION III
Machine hire:
Percent of farms reporting.
Dollars per farm reporting.
Hired labor:
Percent of farms reporting.
Dollars per farm reporting.
Feed for livestock and poultry:
Percent of farms reporting...
Dollars per farm reporting...
Gasoline, fuel, and oil:
Percent of farms reporting. , .
Dollars per farm reporting. , .
Fertilizer and fertilizer material:
Percent of farms reporting...
Dollars per farm reporting...
Lime and hming material:
Percent of farms reporting,,.
Dollars per farm reporting,..
Economic class of farm
All
classes
67.8
146
65.4
479
46.0
151
47.0
305
97.2
444
4.6
112
1,062
63.2
90
61,5
226
44.8
121
42.1
154
97.2
281
Average of specified expenses per farm
dollars..
5.1
81
569
55.1
112
62.2
317
53.6
128
43.4
200
95.6
237
2.2
110
60.6
1,628
8.3
U, 681
61.7
1,664
95.8
3,730
23, 814
66.5
1,191
100.0
12, 110
87.0
2,216
100.0
3.023
100-0
8,394
62.2
642
26,411
69.1
2,060
97.9
12,188
66.1
2,000
97.7
3,386
4,326
23.6
633
63.9
661
96.2
3,204
65.6
731
96.6
1,401
97.4
2,471
21.9
270
7,804
48.9
670
94.4
3,062
48.3
984
94.4
1,302
95.0
2,608
23.3
334
61.6
722
92.5
2,772
63.8
752
93.0
1,106
97.2
1,387
16.0
249
III
69.9
343
84.2
1,023
54.1
316
77.6
492
98.5
916
10.8
129
2,669
69.7
342
90.6
1,073
48.3
536
85.9
651
99.3
,197
21.4
122
56.2
80.0
866
60.2
347
80.7
430
97.2
589
7.6
138
612 I 22, 414 6, 903 1, 992 832 426 226
IV
B8.7
171
75.8
353
46.0
144
57.8
241
97.6
474
6.0
83
1,056
66.6
162
69.3
346
43.4
218
69.9
222
96.6
479
9.7
103
1,036
54.2
160
64.9
317
52.4
168
61.0
213
96.2
330
4.0
68.4
106
34.6
185
43.4
154
96.7
320
3.6
63
612
63.1
95
66.6
161
42.8
115
45.0
122
97.6
281
5.4
65
66.4
91
62.6
143
61.2
102
44.1
123
96.7
201
1.7
66
65.9
57
48.6
87
46.6
67
97.1
167
1.6
64
62.9
54
40.6
74
46.6
72
32.6
73
97.1
158
2.7
41
276
63.6
49
56.0
71
26.7
72
Region and item
REGION IV
Machine hire:
Percent of farms reporting
Dollars per farm reporting
Hired labor:
Percent of farms reporting
Dollars per farm reporting.
Feed for livestock and poultry:
Percent of farms reporting
Dollars per farm reporting
Gasoline, fuel, and oil:
Percent of farms reporting
Dollars per farm reporting
Fertihzer and fertilizer material:
Percent of farms reporting
Dollars per farm reporting
Lime and liming material:
Percent of farms reporting...
Dollars per farm reporting
Average of specified expenses per farm
dollars..
REGION V
Machine hire:
Percent of farms reporting
Dollars per farm reporting
Hired labor:
Percent of farms reporting
Dollars per farm reporting
Feed for livestock and poultry:
Percent of farms reporting
Dollars per farm reporting
Gasoline, fuel, and oil:
Percent of farms reporting
Dollars per farm reporting
Fertilizer and fertilizer material:
Percent of farms reporting
DoDars per farm reporting
Lime and liming material:
Percent of farms reporting
Dollars per farm reporting
Average of specified expenses per farm
dollars..
REGION VI
Machine hire:
Percent of farms reporting..
Dollars per farm reporting
Hired labor:
Percent of farms reporting
Dollars per farm rcportmg
Feed for livestock and poultry:
Percent of farms reporting.
Dollars per farm reporting
Gasoline, fuel, and oil:
Percent of farms reporting
Dollars per farm reporting^
Fertihzer and fertihzer material:
Percent of farms reporting
Dollars per farm reporting
Lime and liming material:
Percent of farms reporting
Dollars per farm reporting
Average of specified expenses per farm
dollars.
Economic class of farm
All
classes
I
II
III
IV
v
68.5
320
70.1
3,366
73.3
1,124
69.3
474
67.7
236
68.5
132
66.1
1,104
98.9
12,644
95.4
2,887
79.3
1,004
59.7
399
46.9
184
40.8
166
60.4
1,444
64.2
373
47.9
181
42.5
118
36.6
88
49.6
462
98.6
3,989
95.3
1,064
76.1
422
53.4
209
37.6
120
87.9
281
95.1
3,286
90.9
877
87.4
364
88.2
198
88.8
120
1.6
244
11.3
713
5.0
248
2.9
200
1.1
93
0.6
61
1,386
22,726
6,603
1,856
735
360
49.1
228
06.6
3,630
63.4
1,266
60.6
439
55.9
225
49.2
119
67.4
723
99.5
15,311
96.2
3,190
86.7
1,197
78.8
497
60.1
219
69.7
202
57.2
2,974
63.0
773
66.3
401
64.8
222
65.3
159
53.9
302
100.0
3,649
96.4
1,000
85.8
479
77.6
272
68 2
163
82.9
243
83.3
3,199
90.9
880
85.8
459
83.8
307
82.5
192
1.3
126
10.7
381
4.0
174
1.7
162
3.2
99
0.8
105
1,033
25,609
6,128
2,378
1,133
548
65.4
361
85.1
2,408
68.4
767
69.8
387
49.1
215
48.5
103
81.4
968
93.6
7,303
93.5
2,224
89.9
1,236
87.7
523
73.3
254
72.9
259
75.0
1,062
69.5
506
74.7
320
72.9
207
72.7
161
76.8
310
100.0
1,648
94,2
624
92.6
358
77.9
199
66.6
143
45.8
229
0.6
71
66.7
1,466
0.6
1,250
48.3
450
42.2
267
0.3
5
47.8
151
0.6
45
60.2
126
0.8
40
1.613
12,303
3,754
2,069
942
612
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION
51
Table 32. — Percent of Farms Reporting and
Average Expenditure for Selected Items per Farm, for
Class, by Regions: 1954 — Continued
Cotton Farms
, BY Economic
Economic class of farm
Region and Item
Economic class of farm
Region and item
AU
classes
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
All
classes
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
REGION VII
Machine hire:
82,9
463
85.6
1,262
69.9
288
90.4
447
21.4
217
0.2
62
2,107
58.5
1,031
93.8
4,171
34.1
565
91.8
1,109
48.7
826
0.4
319
6,129
88.4
3,128
99.5
11,169
58.9
871
99.7
2,151
29.1
1,138
0.8
164
16, 867
69.1
2,919
100.0
13, 957
37.2
1,508
98 9
3,128
68.0
2,198
1.8
376
21, 132
91 7
1,022
98.4
2,973
70.3
613
98.2
893
23.4
363
0.2
134
5,184
62.9
966
98.1
3,736
40.0
403
98,3
1,108
54.5
677
5,891
89,4
507
94.4
1,298
73.6
331
96.8
631
24,8
228
0.2
48
2,493
53.5
603
97.4
1,842
35.2
415
96.6
023
60.4
309
0.4
134
2,966
84,6
288
89,9
606
71.4
267
93,0
328
20,6
161
0.3
46
1,318
49.5
319
91.8
981
29.2
372
89.6
360
39.0
201
77,*3
169
77 2
315
68,9
192
86 6
222
20.0
116
0.1
46
721
66.3
223
86.4
441
25.8
116
78.8
230
31.7
117
68, 1
89
59,3
142
62 8
128
69,4
136
16,0
74
331
69,3
99
66 7
239
29,6
94
61,1
182
27.8
74
REGION IX
Machine hire:
90,7
1,431
93.0
3,284
65.3
470
98 0
1,538
15.7
691
(Z)
60
6,274
81.3
3,365
93.1
9,099
43.8
1,298
94.6
2,001
77.4
2.612
1.6
662
16, 696
94.2
2,801
99.0
6,665
69.9
696
98,7
2,951
28,0
1,035
(Z)
270
12, 858
86.7
7,023
99.1
19, 834
38.2
3,016
97.6
4,103
92.1
6,214
L8
847
36. 726
90.7
1,157
94,5
2,440
67.1
440
99.0
1,303
13.8
406
0.1
6
4,998
84.4
1,356
94.5
2,828
51.4
490
97.9
966
79.6
717
1.8
418
6, 593
90.7
692
92.0
1,266
68.7
367
98.0
675
7.7
239
91.2
352
85,3
618
69.5
331
96.1
449
6.6
108
75.9
207
74,6
286
64.9
231
92,1
301
86
53
Dollars per farm reporting
Dollars per farm reporting
123
Hired labor:
Percent of farms reporting
Hired labor:
Percent of farms reporting
23 8
Dollars per farm reporting
259
Feed for livestock and poultry:
Percent of farms reporting
Feed for livestock and poultry:
Dollars per farm reporting
Dollars per farm reporting
138
Gasoline, fuel, and oil:
Percent of farms reporting. .
Gasoline, fuel, and oil:
Percent of farms reporting
86.7
145
Dollars per farm reporting
Fertilizer and fertilizer material:
Percent of farms reporting
Fertilizer and fertilizer material:
4 8
Dollars per farm reporting
DoUars per farm reporting
80
Lime and liming material:
Percent of farms reporting
Lime and liming material:
Dollars per farm reporting -
Dollars per farm reporting
Average of specified expenses per farm
dollars. .
REGION VIII
Machine hire:
Percent of farms reporting
Average of specified expenses per farm
dollars. -
REGION X
Machine hire:
2,633
77.9
634
89.0
1,418
48.4
654
96.0
536
70.2
303
2.2
253
2,761
1,615
73.7
357
89.8
750
44.3
277
88.8
291
58.6
176
0.4
250
1,422
802
61.6
322
78.6
352
33.4
225
77.1
177
47.5
108
327
Hired labor:
Percent of farms reporting...
Hired labor:
Dollars per farm reporting
Dollars per farm reporting
188
Feed for livestock and poultry:
Percent of farms reporting
Feed for livestock and poultry:
Percent of farms reporting
36 8
Dollars per farm reporting. .
Gasoline, fuel, and oil:
Percent of farms reporting
Dollars per farm reporting
Gasnlme, fuel, .and oil:
Percent of farms reporting
Dollars per farm reportmg
Fertilizer and fertilizer material:
Percent of farms reporting. _
66.8
84
18.4
53
Fertilizer and fertilizer material:
Percent of farms reporting
Dollars per farm reporting...
Lime and liming material:
Percent of farms reporting
Lime and liming material:
Percent of farms reportmg
Dollars per farm reporting.
Average of specified expenses per farm
dollars. -
Dollars per farm reporting
Average of specified expenses per farm
dollars..
1,567
762
378
738
256
Z 0.05 percent or less.
The interpretation of these sales levels in terms of the levels of
income from farming that are associated with them is facilitated
by examination of the data in table 33. In this table the total
of specified production expense items has been subtracted from
total sales per farm. The fact should be borne in mind that,
in general, the total of these specified items of expense probably
does not exceed 60 percent of total cash production expenses
when all items are included.
For Class IV farms the sales minus specified expenses per farm
are, for most regions, between $2,200 and $2,500. Only in Regions
IV and VI, which show $2,600 and $2,700, respectively, does the
average of sales minus specified expenses for Class IV farms
exceed $2,500.
In the instance of Class V farms, the cash incomes above speci-
fied expenses are between $1,100 and $1,200 for seven of the ten
regions. Farms in Region IV have the highest value for per farm
sales minus specified expenses for Class V farms. This is shown
to be $1,400.
For farms in Class VI average value of sales minus specified
expenses for the ten regions is $520. The highest value for any
region is $603, while in the region having the lowest value the
amount is $394.
Table 33. — Sales Minus Specified Expenses per Farm for
Cotton Farms, by Economic Class, by Regions: 1954
Economic class of farm
Region
AU
classes
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
I....
Dollars
1,699
1,087
1,630
3,172
1,726
3,867
3,860
10, 791
15, 538
32, 186
a, 406
Dollars
18, 272
21,787
28, 429
34, 345
34,711
27,590
35, 828
38, 076
33. 817
74, 714
46.103
Dollars
6. 546
6,884
8,494
9, 039
8, 029
10. 631
9,289
10, 779
11,964
10,403
9,887
Dollars
3,910
3,716
4, 403
4, 8,36
4, 195
4,772
4,415
4,86')
6, 090
4,441
4,547
Dollars
2, 3,55
2,254
2,485
2.644
2,227
2,721
2,296
1, 946
2,461
2.499
2,478
Dollars
1.158
1.199
1,303
1,409
1,159
1,382
1,194
1,166
1,167
1,142
1,289
Dollars
496
II
498
III
IV
596
V
VI
524
VII
509
VIII
IX
X
603
Total, 10 regions
620
52
FARMERS AND FARM PRODUCTION
It has been mentioned that, since Census data do not cover all
cash expense items, the value of sales less specified expenses per
farm probably overstates net cash farm income. It also prob-
ably overstates, even more, net incomes on tenant-operated farms
since they receive only a share of crops. There is one important
item of noncash cost for which it is possible to make an estimate
using Census data as a basis. This is interest on investment per
farm. Estimated values for this item are shown in table 34.
These values were obtained by applying rates of 5 percent to
value of investment in land and. buildings, and 7 percent to the
value of investment in machinery and equipment and livestock.
Table 34. — Estimated Interest on Investment per Farm for
Cotton Farms, by Economic Class, by Regions: 1954
Economic class of farm
Region
All
classes
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
I.__
Dollars
403
312
364
724
603
1,211
1.636
3,772
4,012
6,963
886
Dollars
6,684
6,504
7, 735
10, 132
10, 298
7, 604
9. 263
12, 167
7.676
14.614
10, 717
Dollars
2, 432
2,654
3,083
2,953
2,889
3.244
3.819
3.716
3.392
3,633
3,285
Dollars
857
1,163
1,029
1,008
1,311
1, 405
2,011
1,970
1,939
1,821
1,332
Dollars
373
495
472
444
685
849
1,171
1,228
1,399
1,196
686
Dollars
246
307
283
235
399
573
712
810
1,041
650
311
Dollars
149
II
202
Ill
181
IV
151
V
252
VI
307
VII
438
VIII
571
IX
661
X
425
196
When this allowance is made for remuneration of the aggregate
of physical sources that are employed, the residual of sales that
is left to compensate the human agent, to take care of nonspecified
cash expenses, and to allow for replacement of worn-out equip-
ment, is strikingly small on the three smallest size-of-business
groups. Even for Class III farms, the residual of around $3,000
per farm for most regions suggests very modest returns to the
people involved.
Table 35. — Sales per Farm Minus Specified Expenses and
Imputed Interest on Investment for Economic Classes of
Cotton Farms, by Regions: 1954
Region
I-
II
Ill
IV ..._
V __
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
Total, 10 regions
Economic class of fai-m
All
classes
Dollars
1,296
775
1,166
2,448
1,122
2,666
2,224
7,019
11, 626
25, 222
2,620
Dollars
11.588
15, 223
20,694
24, 213
24, 413
19, 986
26, 665
25, 909
26, 141
60.100
36,386
Dollars
4.114
4,230
6,411
6,088
6,140
7,387
5,470
7.063
8,572
6,770
6,602
III
Dollars
3,053
2,663
3,374
3,828
2,884
3,367
2,404
2,890
3, 151
2,620
3,216
IV
Dollars
1,982
1,769
2,013
2,200
1,642
1,872
1,124
718
1,062
1,303
1,892
Dollars
912
892
1,020
1,174
760
809
482
366
126
492
978
VI
Dollars
347
296
360
445
144
217
71
-114
-267
178
326
Data that relate more specifically to the levels of labor produc-
tivity on cotton farms are provided in tables 36 and 37. In these
tables sales per farm minus specified expenses, and sales per
farm minus both specified expenses and imputed interest on
investment have been divided by the estimated man-equivalent
workers per farm.
For these two tables expenditures for hired labor were not de-
ducted. This procedure was used because hired workers are a
component of the farm labor resources. The reader should keep
in mmd that not all cash expenses are allowed for, and that no
deduction has been made for depreciation. The values shown in
these two tables, therefore, overstate the net output and produc-
tivity of the human agent.
Attention is invited to the relatively modest values shown for
even the largest farms. In a different context, and with different
implications, it is important to note also the progressive increase
shown in this crude measure of labor productivity as the size
of business increases from Class VI to Class I in any region.
Table 36. — Sales Minus Specified Expenses (Except Hired
Labor) per Man'Equivalent, for Cotton Farms, by EcO'
NOMic Class and Regions: 1954
Economic class of farm
Region
All
classes
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
I .._ .
Dollars
1,272
959
1,121
2,091
1,393
2,789
2,788
4,405
6,860
9,866
2,401
Dollars
3,163
3,372
4,064
6, 055
4,631
7,421
6,846
5,604
8,667
11,396
8,106
Dollars
2,784
3,132
3,453
4,346
3,664
6,743
4,369
4,488
6,097
6,254
4,734
Dollars
2,121
2,324
2,281
2,742
2,644
3,091
3,037
3,202
3,766
3,979
2,748
Dollars
1,648
1,640
1,478
1,600
1,646
2,031
1,926
1,927
2,462
2,907
1,618
Dollars
911
1,027
947
1,006
942
1,176
1,163
1,435
1,325
1,716
984
Dollars
435
II
Ill
470
461
IV
499
V .
356
VI .
493
vn
607
VIII
624
IX
401
X -.-
716
Total, 10 regions
459
Table 37- — Sales Minus Specified Expenses (Except Hired
Labor) and Imputed Interest on Investment per Man-
Equivalent, for Cotton Farms, by Economic Class and
Regions: 1954
Economic class of farm
Region
AU
classes
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
I
Dollars
1,020
699
878
1,689
991
2,077
1,879
3,296
6,374
8,168
1,880
Dollars
2.442
2,716
3,283
4,739
3,678
5,768
4,702
4,210
7,034
9,634
6,637
Dollars
2. 069
2,276
2,490
3,262
2,632
4,268
2,995
3,327
4,684
4,448
3,617
Dollars
1,748
1,747
1,813
2,238
1,920
2,352
1,979
2,264
2,543
2,678
2,082
Dollars
1,329
1,310
1,216
1,363
1,143
1,500
1,089
1,060
1,296
1,820
1,273
Dollars
736
791
746
848
667
735
660
699
284
994
762
Dollars
311
II
286
in
310
IV
383
V -
146
VI
237
VII
142
VIII
48
IX
-191
X - . ..
291
Total, 10 regions
297
COTTON PRODUCERS AND COTTON PRODUCTION
53
INDICATED RETURNS PER OPERATOR AND FAMILY
MAN-EQUIVALENT WORKER
The data examined above give some indication of tlie produc-
tivity and possible returns to all labor. Data are presented in
tables 38 and 39 to indicate returns to operator and family labor
and management. Table 38 shows the return per man-etjuivalent
operator and family worker for the use of capital and their labor
and management.
Table 38. — Sales Minus Specified Expenses per Operator
AND Family Worker for Cotton Farms, by Economic
Class and Regions: 1954
Economic class of form
Region
AU
classes
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
I . . -
Dollars
1,214
988
1,093
2,116
1,438
2,976
3,509
10, 791
16,538
32, 185
2,620
Dollars
20,302
21, 787
28, 429
34,345
31, 655
22, 992
32, 671
38, 076
30, 743
67, 922
41, 381
Dollars
6,546
6,884
6,634
7,632
7,299
8,859
8,445
10, 779
10, 876
10, 403
8,988
Dollars
2,444
2,858
2,690
3,023
2,996
3,409
3.679
4,860
5,090
4,934
3,248
Dollars
1,570
1,734
1,462
1,655
1,486
1,944
2,086
2, 162
2,734
2, 777
1,662
Dollars
891
999
1,002
939
892
1,152
1,080
1,295
1,297
1, 428
992
Dollars
413
II
453
Ill
443
IV
458
V
VI
330
437
VII
VIII
463
415
IX - -
358
X
603
Total, 10 regions
433
In table 39, on the other hand, imputed interest on investment
has been deducted. The indication here, therefore, is of return
to operator and family labor and management per man-equivalent
worker.
Table 39. — Sales Minus Specified Expenses and Imputed
Interest on Investment per Man-Equivalent of Operator
AND Family Workers for Economic Classes of Cotton
Farms, by Regions: 1954
Economic class of farm
Region
AU
classes
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
I
Dollars
926
705
833
1,632
936
2,043
2,022
7,019
11,626
25, 222
1,938
Dollars
12, 875
15,223
20, 694
24,213
22,194
16, 656
24,150
25,909
23,766
5i636
32, 169
Dollars
4, 114
4,230
4,162
6,072
4,673
6,166
4,973
7,063
7,793
6,770
6,002
Dollars
1,908
1,972
1,986
2,392
2,060
2,406
2,003
2,890
3,151
2,911
2,296
Dollars
1, 321
1,353
1,184
1,294
1,028
1,337
1,022
798
1,180
1,448
1,261
Dollars
702
743
785
783
685
674
438
396
140
615
752
Dollars
II
Ill - - .
292
IV
V
120
VI
VII
65
VIII
IX -
-104
234
X.
178
Total, 10 regions
It will be ob.served tliat for Class VI farnxs the returns per
worker for both capital and labor and management are below
$500 in all regions except one ; there it is only $000.
After allowing for interest on investment, the range among
regions of indicated returns per operator and family worker on
the various size-of-business groups is as follows: Class VI — from
a loss to about $342; Class V— from $140 to $785; Class IV— from
about $800 to about $1,450; Class III— from about $1,910 to
about $2,910; Class II— from about $4,100 to about $7,800; and
Class I— from $12,875 to $54,636.
INVESTMENT PER DOLLAR OF SALES
In table 40 data are given that show the ratio of total invest-
ment to total sales and to sales minus specified expenses. These
data afford a very rough indication of the relative productivity
of capital employed on the various economic classes of cotton
farms, in the different regions. In a general way, relatively low
values of investment ner dollar of sales indicate relatively high
productivity of capital.
The principal conclusion which might tentatively be drawn
from these data is that the productivity of capital — like that of
labor — -is generally higher on the larger than on the smaller size-
of-business farms.
Table 40. — Total Investment on Cotton Farms per Dollar
of Sales, by Economic Class of Farm, by Regions: 1954
Region
I...
II....
Ill
IV
V
VI... -
VII .._
VIII
IX
X
Total, 10 regions
I -
II
Ill
IV
v....
VI
VII
VIII
IX _
X
Total, 10 regions
Economic class of farm
AU
classes
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
Investment per doUar of gross sales (doUar)
2.71
2.94
3.20
2.45
2.23
2.83
3.49
2.48
3.42
3.12
2.84
3.29
3.14
3.04
4.04
2.98
2.64
3.03
2.94
3.29
3.67
2.79
2.39
2.41
4.U5
3.22
3.78
3.69
3.71
4.26
4.25
3.60
4.26
3.88
4.38
6.71
5.17
3.38
4.98
5.49
6.12
7.01
4.29
3.96
4.21
4.84
6.60
8.13
3. ,54
3.16
3.77
4.74
6.64
9.98
2.74
2.50
4.21
4.78
6.66
6.40
3.34
2.92
4.03
3.71
3.18
3.27
3.91
4.83
4.41
3.62
7.08
7.23
9.64
13.16
16.72
9.16
4.72
Investment per dollar of sales less specified expenses
(doUars)
6.25
7.50
6.29
4.70
11.77
10.85
15.91
24.03
30.61
13.05
6.95
4.40
6.77
7.01
4.06
3.23
4.33
5.32
5.48
7.14
6.75
4.15
4.75
4.40
5.44
6.85
4.33
3.62
4.02
4.23
6.46
5.94
3.80
3.06
3.03
6.47
6.60
6.66
5.79
6.60
6.25
6.91
6.20
5.76
6.66
6.89
7.83
8.00
4.97
7.76
8.69
9.63
11.26
6.72
6.16
6.50
7.79
11.91
13.37
4.97
4.36
6.35
7.19
10.73
16.83
4.08
3.69
6.47
7.74
8.86
10.64
4.90
4.39
6.28
6.63
4.38
4.46
U. S. GOVERMMENT PBINTINS OFFICE. I95I