Skip to main content

Full text of "University extension : has it a future?"

See other formats


ONE     SHILLING 


HAS  IT  A 


FUTURE  ? 


H.  j.  MACKINDEH,  M.A. 

Reader  in  Geography  in  the  U,"    ,sity  of  Oxford 
Staff  Lecturer  to  the    Oxford    University   Extension 


MICHAEL  E.  SADLER,  M.A. 

Student  ann   .r-'kimrd  r\f  Christ  Church 
to  the   Oxford  Dcki/atcs  for   University  Extension- 


LONDON:    HENRY    FROWDE 

OXFORD    UNIVERSITY    PRESS    WAREHOUSE,    AMEN    CORNER,    E.C. 

:  116  $)i$  gfmf 

1890 


LIBRARY 

OF  THK 

UNIVERSITY  OF  CALIFORNIA. 

A  c cessions  No. 4ifyB2£-/J0-  - .      Shelf  No 


r 


SJmbemtg  iSxtenston 


A  SERIES  of  University  Extension  Manuals  will  shortly  be  published  by 
Mr.  MURRAY,  Albemarle  Street,  London,  under  the  Editorship  of  Professor 
KNIGHT,  of  the  University  of  St.  Andrews,  designed  to  aid  the  University 
Extension  movement  throughout  the  country,  and  to  supply  the  need  so 
widely  felt  by  students,  of  Text-books  for  study  and  references,  in  connexion 
with  the  authorised  Courses  of  Lectures. 

The  Series  will  include  the  following  Works  : — 


Professor  W.  ANDERSON,  Oriel  College,  Ox- 
ford, and  Frith  College,  Sheffield. 
The  Daily  Life  of  the  Greeks  and  Romans. 
ARTHUR  BERRY,  Fellow  of  King's  College, 

Cambridge  (Senior  Wrangler). 
The  History  of  Astronomy. 
F.  S.  BOAS,  Balliol  College,  Oxford. 
Shakespeare •,  and  his  predecessors  in  the 

English  Drama. 

STOPFORD  A.  BROOKE,  Trinity  College,  Dublin. 
The  English  Poets,  from  Blake  to  Tenny- 
son. 
Professor   BALDWIN   BROWN,   University  of 

Edinburgh. 
The  Fine  A  rts. 
A.  CALDECOTT,  Fellow  of  St.  John's  College, 

Cambridge. 

English  Colonization  and  Empire. 
JOHN  Cox,  late  Warden  of  Cavendish  Col- 
lege, Fellow  of  Trinity  College,   Cam- 
bridge. 
Energy  in  Nature,  an  Introduction  to 

Physical  Science. 

W.  CUNNINGHAM,  University  Lecturer,  Cam- 
bridge. 

The  Use  and  Abuse  of  Capital. 
Professor  PATRICK  GEDDES,  University  Col- 
lege, Dundee. 

Outlines  of  Modern  Botany. 
EDMUND  GOSSE,  Trinity  College,  Cambridge. 

The  Jacobean  Poets. 

Professor   KNIGHT,   University   of  St.   An- 
drews. 

A  n  Introduction  to  Philosophy. 
The  Philosophy  of  the  Beautiful. 
Professor  SIMON   S,  LAURIE,  University  of 

Edinburgh. 

Text  Book  oflhe  History  of  Education. 
Sir  ALFRED  LYALL,  K.C.B.,  K. C.S.I. 
British  Dominion  in  India. 


C.  E.  MALLET,  Balliol  College,  Oxford. 

The  French  Revolution. 
Professor   MCKENDRICK,  the  University  of 
Glasgow,  and  Dr.  SNODGRASS,   Physio- 
logical Laboratory,  Glasgow. 
The  Physiology  of  the  Senses. 
Professor   MENZIES,   University  of  St.  An- 
drews. 

Comparative  Religion, 

HUGH  ROBERT  MILL,  University   of  Edin- 
burgh. 

Physiography. 
Professor  MINTO,  University  of  Aberdeen. 

Logic,  Inductive  and  Deductive. 
JOHN  H.  MUIRHEAD,  Balliol  College,  Oxford, 
Lecturer    on     Moral     Science,     Royal 
Holloway  College. 
The  Elements  of  Ethics, 
Professor  RALEIGH, University  College,  Liver- 

rl. 
English  Novel,  from,  its  Origin  to 
Sir  W:  Scott. 
WILLIAM  RENTON,  University  of  St.  Andrews. 

Oictlines  of  English  Literature. 
R.  D.  ROBERTS,    Fellow  of  Clare  College, 
Cambridge,  Secretary  to  the  Cambridge 
and  LondonUniversity  Extension  Syndi- 
cates. 

Studies  in  Modern  Geology. 
M.    E.    SADLER,    Senior  Student  of  Christ 
Church,  Oxford,  Secretary  to  the  Oxford 
University  Extension  Delegacy. 
Problems  of  Political  Economy. 
Professor  SETH,  University  of  St.  Andrews. 

Psychology,  a  Historical  Sketch. 
Professor    JAMES     STUART,    M.P.,    Trinity 

College,  Cambridge. 
Mechanics. 

J.  ARTHUR  THOMSON,  University   of  Edin- 
burgh. 
The  Study  of  Animal  Life. 


LONDON : 
JOHN    MURRAY,    ALBEMARLE    STREET. 


UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION 

HAS  IT  A   FUTURE? 


HORACE  HART,   PRINTER  TO   THE   UNIVERSITY 


UNIVERSITY  EXTENSION 


HAS   IT  A    FUTURE  f 


H.   J.   MACKINDEE, 

READER    IN    GEOGRAPHY    IN   THE    UNIVERSITY   OF    OXFORD 
STAFF    LECTURER    TO    THE     OXFORD     UNIVERSITY    EXTENSION 


M.  E.  SADLER 

STUDENT   AND    STEWARD    OF    CHRIST   CHURCH 
SECRETARY   TO    THE    OXFORD    DELEGATES    FOR   UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION 


UNI7EESIT7 


Bonfcon 
HENRY    FROWDE 

OXFORD    UNIVERSITY    PRESS    WAREHOUSE,    AMEN    CORNER,    E.G. 

OXFORD:    116    HIGH   STREET 
1890 

[All  rights  reserved] 


r\* 


v- 


CONTENTS. 


INTRODUCTORY. 

PAGE 
Elementary    Education    and    Public    Libraries    necessitate . 

Higher  Education  ........         2 

General  as  well  as  Technical  Education       ....         4 

The  Ideal  System  of  Higher  Education        ....         5 

Objects  of  this  Enquiry         .......         5 

CHAPTER  I.    UNIVERSITY  EXTENSION  AS  IT  is. 

V^\\S     -N       . 

The  Natural  History  of  axTypical  Centre    ....         7 
Variations  from  the  Typical  Centre       .         .         .         .         .10 

The  Four  Central  Authorities n 

The  Central  Offices 13 

The  Lecturers         . 15 

Statistics 17 

Growth  during  the  last  Five  Years      .         .         .         .         .20 

Finance 22 

New  Developments        .         .         .         .         .         .         .  24 

The  Federation  of  Centres 27 

Affiliation  of  Centres  to  the  Universities      .         .         .         .28 

Summer  Meetings  .         .         .         .         .         .         ,         .29 

Scholarships   ..........       32 

Extension  Journalism  and  Literature    .         .         .         .         •       34 

The  Different  Classes  of  Students 35 

Long  and  Short  Courses        .......       39 

The  Merits  and  Demerits  of  Extension  as  it  is  .         .         .       43 


VI  CONTENTS. 

CHAPTER  II.     UNIVERSITY  EXTENSION:  How 

IT    HAS    COME    TO    BE. 

PAGE 

The  Origin  of  the  Phrase  '  University  Extension '  -45 

The  Seven  Schemes  for  University  Extension  in  1850  .  48 

The  First  Proposal  for  University  Extension  Teaching,  1850  .  51 

Sir  Thomas  Acland  and  the  Beginning  of  Local  Examinations  55 

Professor  Stuart  and  the  Beginning  of  Local  Lectures  .  61 
Official  Recognition  of  Extension  Teaching  by  the  University 

of  Cambridge  .........  66 

The  First  Programme  of  University  Extension  Teaching  .  71 
The  "Difficulties  which  it  Encountered  .  .  .  -72 

The  Foundation  of  the  London  Extension  Society  .  .  74 

The  University  of  Oxford  enters  on  the  Work  .  .  •  75 

The  New  Departure  in  1885 78 

The  Oxford  Travelling  Libraries  and  Summer  Meetings  .  79 

An  Anticipation  of  the  Idea  of  the  Summer  Meeting  .  81 
The  Natural  Character  of  the  Development  of  University 

Extension    ....             .....  82 

CHAPTER  III.     UNIVERSITY  EXTENSION  :   HAS 
IT  A  FUTURE  ? 

University  Extension  needs  Men : 

J.  Lecturers     .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .         .  85 

The  Training  of  Lecturers.         .         .         .         .  91 

The  Oxford  Method  of  Selecting  Lecturers       .         .  98 

2.  Organizers  .........  100 

University  Extension  needs  Money  : 

1.  Locally 101 

2.  At  Head-Quarters 107 

The  Three  Sources  whence  Money  may  be  drawn : 

1.  Private  Munificence  .......     108 

2.  The  Universities  and  Colleges  .         .         .         .         .no 

3.  The  State .         .         .112 


CONTENTS.  Vll 

PAGE 

The  Justice  of  State  Aid  to  University  Extension  .  .113 
The  Expediency  of  State  Aid  to  University  Extension  .  115 
The  Practicability  of  State  Aid  to  University  Extension  .  116 

The  National  Committee's  Work 118 

The  Treasury  Grant  Scheme         .         .         .         .         .         .120 

The  County  Council  Scheme 121 

The  Possibilities  of  University  Extension  .  .  .  .123 
Summary  and  Conclusion  .  .  .  .  .  .  .125 

APPENDIX. 

I.  Application  of  the  Extra  Spirit  Duty. 

Statement  by  Mr.  Goschen   in  the  House   of  Com- 
mons,  July  21,  1890       ......     130 

II.  Treasury  Minute  concerning  Grants  to  Local  Colleges     133 

III.  The   Central  Authorities  for  University  Extension   in 

England 136 

IV.  The  District  Federations  of  Centres      .         .         .         .136 

MAPS. 

1.  Oxford  Centres  1889-1890. 

2.  Cambridge  Centres  1889-1890. 

3.  University  Extension  Centres  in  England  1889-1890. 

4.  „  „  „          1885-6. 


THE      ~^ 

WVEESIT7 


INTRODUCTORY. 


THE  movement  known  as  University  Extension 
seems  to  have  arrived  at  a  critical  period  in  its 
history.  The  wonderful  growth  of  the  last  two 
years,  whether  we  measure  it  by  statistics  or  by 
the  newly  awakened  interest  of  newspapers  and 
public  men,  seems  to  mark  the  end  of  the  merely 
experimental  stage.  Several  new  developments 
are  extending  the  operations  of  the  system.  We 
begin  to  feel  that  its  tentative  organization  ought 
to  give  way  to  some  more  permanent  arrangement. 
At  the  same  time  it  is  clear  that  both  political 
parties  have  now  come  to  the  conclusion  that  the 
State  must  henceforth  play  a  larger  part  in  national 
education.  On  the  2 1  st  of  July  the  Chancellor  of  the 
Exchequer  intimated  to  the  House  of  Commons  that 
the  Government  proposed  that  part  of  the  money 
accruing  from  the  new  Spirit  tax  should  ultimately 
be  used  for  education 1.  At  once  in  Wales  and 
Monmouthshire,  by  and  by  also  in  England,  it  is  to 
be  devoted  to  the  promotion  of  intermediate, 
technical  and  agricultural  education.  The  post- 

1  See  Appendix  I. 
B 


2  INTRODUCTORY. 

ponement  in  th$  case  of  England  is  on  the  ground 
that  very  little  machinery  at  present  exists  for  the 
proper  employment  of  the  funds  in  question.  We 
claim  that  in  University  Extension  we  have  already 
in  existence  a  system  which  might  easily  be  em- 
ployed as  such  machinery,  so  far  at  least  as  part  of 
intermediate  education  is  concerned.  In  view 
therefore  of  the  present  position  of  University 
Extension  itself,  in  view  also  of  the  impending 
discussion  and  legislation  on  matters  of  educa- 
tion, we  think  that  a  concise  statement  of  what 
University  Extension  is,  of  its  history,  and  of  its 
aims,  may  not  be  without  use.  In  the  course  of 
our  inquiry  we  shall  have  to  make  certain 
suggestions.  We  wish  it  to  be  understood  therefore, 
that  though  we  are  personally  connected  with 
University  Extension,  we  do  not  express  the 
opinions  of  our  colleagues  or  of  the  Delegates  under 
whom  we  serve.  We  would  add  also  that  though 
associated,  especially  with  one  branch  of  the  move- 
ment, we  aim  at  speaking  in  the  interests  of  the 
whole,  and  that  on  subjects  which  have  come  to  be 
matters  of  controversy  we  shall  strive  to  represent 
with  fairness  the  views  of  all  parties. 

ELEMENTARY  EDUCATION  AND  PUBLIC 
LIBRARIES  NECESSITATE  HIGHER  EDUCATION. 

The   fundamental   idea   and   object   of  Univer- 
sity   Extension    is    to   bring    the     University    to 


INTRODUCTORY.  3 

the  people  when  the  people  cannot  come  to 
the  University.  It  may  be  regarded  as  the  out- 
come of  two  great  modern  institutions,  universal 
Elementary  Education  and  free  Public  Libraries.  It 
is  possible  in  its  present  form,  because  of  the  recent 
development  of  our  railway  system. 

When  Parliament,  yielding  to  modern  necessities, 
enacted  compulsory  elementary  education,  it  forced 
on  future  generations  a  two-edged  weapon.  It  was 
certain  therefore  that  as  the  first  generation  of  the 
new  regime  grew  to  maturity,  strong  voice  would 
be  given  to  the  necessity  of  yet  further  changes. 
The  training  of  early  life  having  been  revolutionised, 
all  the  surroundings  of  later  years  were  thrown  out 
of  gear.  It  was  obvious  that,  sooner  or  later,  our 
whole  educational  system  would  have  to  be  recon- 
structed. It  is  now  being  generally  recognised  that 
we  cannot  leave  things  as  they  are.  The  output  of 
demoralising  literature  has  greatly  increased.  An 
intellectual  diet  too  exclusively  of  newspapers 
and  novels  threatens  to  emasculate  the  national 
mind. 

It  is  an  open  question  whether  the  Public 
Libraries  have  not  so  far  greatly  contributed  to 
the  spread  of  the  more  insidious  danger.  Free 
Libraries  are  essential  to  a  community  whose 
masses  can  read  ;  it  is  clear  however  that  alone 
they  are  almost  as  capable  of  abuse  as  the  mere 
power  of  reading.  Carlyle's  idea  that  the  library 
is  the  real  University  is  true  only  within  narrow 
B  2 


4  INTRODUCTORY. 

limits.  It  implies  the  conception  of  a  University 
as  primarily  a  place  of  research,  and  this  again 
involves  researchers  who  are  both  willing  and 
capable.  The  minds  are  rare  which  naturally  take 
to  intellectual  effort,  and  rarer  still  are  those  which 
can  in  isolation  grow  erect  and  strong.  Most  men, 
even  of  great  opportunities,  can  trace  their  intel- 
lectual life  to  the  touch  of  one  or  two  minds  of 
maturity  and  keenness.  And  even  granting  the 
awakened  interest,  in  an  age  when  book-writing 
is  a  trade,  it  requires  an  expert  to  distinguish  be- 
tween the  true  guide  and  the  false. 


GENERAL  AS  WELL  AS   TECHNICAL   EDUCATION. 

Technical  Education  and  Commercial  Education 
are  crying  wants,  and  in  themselves  excellent ;  but 
there  is  need  of  yet  another  kind  of  education, 
unless  reading  is  to  become  a  very  mixed  benefit. 
The  immense  multiplication  of  novels  and  news- 
papers is  evidence  that,  once  admitted  to  the  world 
of  letters,  the  minds  of  men  and  women  demand 
freer  play  than  they  can  find  in  most  ordinary 
callings  in  life.  That  this  play  of  millions  of  minds 
should  be  on  great  thoughts  rather  than  small  ones, 
is  to  be  desired  both  for  the  avoidance  of  evil  and 
for  the  vast  increase  of  good.  The  school  life  of  the 
millions  ends  too  early  to  give  them  more  than 
the  implements  of  learning.  They  need  to  be 


INTRODUCTORY. 


brought  in  contact  with  the  living  cultured  teachers, 
who  are  as  essential  to  the  complete  University  as 
is  the  library. 


THE  IDEAL  SYSTEM  OF  HIGHER  EDUCATION. 

Our  ideal  is  that  a  centre  of  stimulus  and  guid- 
ance should  exist  alongside  of  a  Public  Library  in 
every  town  in  the  country ;  that  they  should  sup- 
plement one  another,  and  that  together  they  should 
carry  forward  the  education  begun  in  the  ele- 
mentary schools.  To  do  the  greatest  service,  such 
a  centre  must  combine  some  of  the  functions  of  the 
higher  forms  in  the  Public  School,  of  the  University 
class-room,  and  of  the  Eoyal  Institution.  It  must 
teach  the  girl  and  youth,  it  must  guide  and  stimu- 
late the  young  man  and  young  woman,  it  must 
maintain  the  intellectual  interest  of  the  older 
citizen.  For  lack  of  some  such  complete  system, 
a  great  amount  of  our  immense  expenditure  on  edu- 
cation is  running  to  waste.  However  incomplete, 
however  tentative,  University  Extension  is  the  one 
great  agency  in  the  field  which  seeks  to  fulfil  this 
ideal. 

OBJECTS  OE  THIS  ENQUIRY. 

We  propose  in  this  pamphlet  enquiring  how  far 
University  Extension,  as  it  exists,  is  satisfactory  ; 


INTRODUCTOKY. 


how  it  has  come  to  be  what  it  is;  whether  it  is 
destined  to  become  a  greater  institution  in  the 
future,  and  whether  it  is  not  now  advisable  for 
the  State  to  recognise  and  assist  it. 


CHAPTER  I. 

UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS   IT   IS. 

THE  NATURAL  HISTORY  OF  A  TYPICAL  CENTRE. 

WE  shall  commence  our  survey  of  University 
Extension  as  it  exists  to-day  by  giving  first  what 
we  may  describe  as  the  natural  history  of  a 
typical  centre.  Some  prominent  inhabitant  of 
a  country  town  hears  of  the  scheme  while  on  a 
visit  or  is  taken  to  a  lecture,  and  being  rather 
an  educational  pillar  in  his  neighbourhood,  he  is 
pleased  with  the  idea.  He  writes  to  Oxford  or 
Cambridge  for  papers,  and  gets  the  subject  up. 
He  invites  a  few  friends  to  his  house  and  ventilates 
his  project.  Being  himself  a  busy  man  he  seeks 
another  to  undertake  the  burden  of  secretaryship. 
As  often  as  not  the  secretary  is  a  lady.  The  Mayor 
is  now  visited  and  a  public  meeting  called.  A 
representative  may  possibly  attend  from  one  of  the 
Universities.  Resolutions  are  passed,  a  committee 
is  elected,  and  the  appointment  of  the  Secretary  is 


8  UNIVERSITY    EXTENSION   AS    IT    IS. 

ratified.  A  house-to-house  journey  or  an  '  at  home' 
raises  the  list  of  guarantors.  The  committee  meet 
to  choose  a  subject  to  begin  with  and  a  lecturer. 
The  Secretary  makes  a  formal  application  to  one  of 
the  Central  Offices,  and  if  the  lecturer  applied  foi- 
ls free,  dates  are  fixed  and  advertisement  is  com- 
menced. The  editors  of  the  local  newspapers  are 
interested,  and  various  members  of  the  committee 
undertake  to  dispose  of  a  certain  number  of 
tickets. 

When  the  lecturer  arrives  for  the  first  time 
he  is  taken  to  the  house  of  one  of  the  com- 
mittee. He  learns  from  his  host  the  nature  of 
the  audience  and  hears  of  many  local  difficulties 
and  peculiarities.  He  delivers  his  inaugural  lecture, 
organizes  his  class  and  explains  the  method  and 
opportunities  of  the  scheme.  If  he  is  successful, 
the  doubtful  are  convinced  and  the  '  course '  is 
satisfactorily  floated.  The  lectures  are  delivered 
at  weekly  or  fortnightly  intervals.  There  are 
from  six  to  twelve  lectures  in  the  course.  A 
universal  characteristic  of  Extension  lectures  is 
the  syllabus,  a  pamphlet  containing  an  analysis 
of  each  lecture,  a  list  of  text-books  and  other 
authorities  on  the  subject,  and  such  quotations  and 
statistics  as  the  lecturer  finds  it  expedient  to  put 
into  print.  Wherever  possible,  the  lectures  are 
illustrated  by  specimens  and  diagrams.  Owing 
to  its  intrinsic  merits  and  to  the  difficulty  of  carry- 
ing cumbersome  diagrams  and  specimens  about  by 


UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS   IT   IS.  9 

train,  the  magic  lantern  is  in  growing  favour  as  a 
means  of  illustration.  In  some  cases  the  lecturer 
is  able  to  make  use  of  the  local  museum  and  in  the 
case  of  one  or  two  courses  on  musical  subjects 
a  local  chorus  has  been  trained  for  purposes  of 
illustration.  After  each  lecture  there  is  a  pause, 
during  which  a  portion  of  the  audience  withdraws, 
leaving  only  the  c  students/  A  '  class '  is  then  held, 
during  which  the  lecturer  goes  into  further  details 
and  explains  difficulties.  The  lecturer  gets  to 
know  personally,  at  least  the  more  active  and 
promising  of  his  students.  At  each  class  questions 
are  given  out  on  which  the  students  write  short 
essays.  These  '  weekly  (or  fortnightly)  papers  '  are 
regarded  as  one  of  the  corner-stones  of  the  system. 
They  are  usually  sent  to  the  lecturer  by  post  and 
he  returns  them  at  the  following  class  bearing  his 
comments.  In  the  case  of  the  Oxford  lectures  a 
'  travelling  library '  accompanies  every  course. 
It  consists  of  a  strong  box  containing  about 
twenty  or  thirty  of  the  books  recommended  by 
the  lecturer.  These  bo.oks  are  either  lent  in  rota- 
tion to  the  students  or  deposited  in  some  accessible 
room  for  reference. 

At  the  close  of  the  course,  the  lecturer  prepares  a 
list  of  those  students  who  have  attended  at  least 
a  certain  proportion — usually  two-thirds  or  three- 
quarters — of  the  classes,  and  have  written  the  same 
proportion  of  the  c  weekly  papers/  These  students 
are  qualified  to  sit  for  the  examination  which  is  held 


10  UNIVERSITY  EXTENSION   AS   IT   IS. 

at  the  centre  by  the  University  authorities.  Three 
weeks  or  a  month  after  the  last  lecture,  the  ex- 
aminer, who  is  appointed  by  the  University  and  is 
other  than  the  lecturer,  issues  a  list  of  successful 
candidates  arranged  in  two  classes,  those  who  have 
'  distinguished '  themselves,  and  those  who  have 
c  satisfied  the  examiner.'  A  prize  is  awarded  to 
the  student  at  the  head  of  the  list.  At  a  later 
meeting,  not  unfrequently  the  first  lecture  of  a  sub- 
sequent course,  the  member  of  parliament  or  some 
other  local  magnate  distributes  the  certificates  and 
gives  away  the  prizes. 


VABIATIONS  PROM  THE  TYPICAL  CENTRE. 

Of  course  there  are  many  variations  from  the 
typical  centre.  In  some  cases  the  course  is  ar- 
ranged and  the  payment  of  the  University  account 
is  guaranteed  by  some  already  existing  society,  a 
Mechanics'  Institute,  a  Loc.al  College,  or  a  Public 
Library,  occasionally  even  by  a  wealthy  individual. 
The  working-men's  centres  in  the  north  of  England 
are  in  several  instances  organized  by  co-operative 
societies.  In  all  cases,  however,  the  essential  parts 
of  the  local  organization  are  the  Local  Secretary, 
who  maintains  touch  with  the  Central  Univeisity 
Office,  and  the  person  or  persons  who  guarantee 
the  payment  of  the  University  bill. 


UNIVERSITY  EXTENSION  AS  IT  IS.          11 

THE  FOUR  CENTRAL  AUTHORITIES. 

Four  different  bodies  carry  on  the  central  organ- 
ization of  University  Extension  in  England,  the 
University  of  Oxford,  the  University  of  Cambridge, 
the  London  Society  for  the  Extension  of  Univer- 
sity Teaching,  and  the  Victoria  University.  At 
Oxford,  the  managing  authority  is  a  Committee 
appointed  for  the  purpose  by  the  Delegacy  of 
Local  Examinations.  At  Cambridge,  it  is  the 
Local  Examinations  and  Lectures  Syndicate.  The 
Oxford  Congregation  elects  the  Delegacy  19  the  Cam- 
bridge Senate  the  Syndicate,  so  that  both  at  Oxford 
and  Cambridge,  University  Extension  is  authorised 
by  the  general  bodies  of  resident  Masters  of  Arts. 
The  London  Society  is  governed  by  a  Council, 
which,  on  educational  matters,  is  assisted  and  ad- 
vised by  a  Joint  Board,  consisting  of  three  re- 
presentatives of  each  of  the  Universities  of  Oxford, 
Cambridge,  and  London.  The  General  Board  of 
Studies  of  the  Victoria  University  has  a  Committee 
for  Local  Lectures.  Each  of  the  four  bodies  entrusts 
the  detailed  management  to  a  Secretary,  who,  in 
the  cases  of  Oxford,  Cambridge,  and  London,  has 
an  office  and  clerks. 

The  chief  function  of  the  '  Central  Office '  is  to 
supply  to  the  local  centres  competent  lecturers  and 
examiners. 

1  Either  directly  or  through  the  Hebdomadal  Council.  A  few 
members  are  added  by  the  Vice- Chancellor  and  the  Proctors. 


12  UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS    IT   IS. 

Within  the  Metropolitan  Postal  District  the 
London  Society  has  a  monopoly,  on  the  ground 
that  since  Oxford  and  Cambridge  are  represented  on 
its  Joint  Board,  they  would  be  competing  against 
themselves  if  they  entered  this  field.  This  is  obvi- 
ously a  temporary  arrangement,  and  it  is  worth 
noting  that-  in  the  neighbourhood  of  London,  but 
outside  the  Postal  District,  the  London  Society 
competes  with  the  Universities.  Speaking  broadly, 
Oxford  and  Cambridge  are  competitors  in  the  re- 
mainder of  England,  though  the  competition  is  of  a 
limited  character.  Neither  seeks  to  supplant  the 
other,  but  both  go  wherever  their  services  are  in 
request.  The  practice  is  increasing  in  many  towns 
of  seeking  a  lecturer  sometimes  from  the  one,  some- 
times from  the  other.  An  exception,  however, 
exists  in  those  centres  which  the  University  of 
Cambridge  has  affiliated  to  itself  for  a  term  of  three 
or  four  years.  In  and  near  the  cities  of  Liverpool, 
Manchester,  and  Leeds,  the  older  universities  find  a 
third  competitor  in  the  Victoria  University,  which 
has  the  natural  protection  due  to  its  being  on 
the  spot,  but  no  monopoly.  In  Durham  and 
Northumberland,  Cambridge  works  in  conjunction 
with  the  Durham  University.  There  are  various 
opinions  on  tlie  question  of  competition.  Some 
consider  that  it  is  detrimental  to  the  standard  of 
work  aimed  at.  Personally,  we  can  quite  see  the 
objections  to  it,  and  think  that  it  is  a  principle 
which  should  not  be  unlimited  in  its  scope.  We 


UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS   IT   IS.  13 

believe,  however,  that  hitherto  it  has  contributed 
greatly  to  the  life  of  the  movement,  and  done  little 
or  no  harm.  It  adds  esprit  de  corps  to  the  incen- 
tives of  the  lecturer,  a  factor  which  we  may  note 
plays  a  great  part  in  the  College  systems  of 
Oxford  and  Cambridge . 

Each  of  the  four  authorities  has  a  staff  of  lec- 
turers, a  few  of  whom  devote  themselves  wholly 
to  Extension  work,  but  most  of  them  hold  some 
second  appointment.  Some  names  appear  on  the 
lists  of  two  different  staffs,  and  the  London  Society 
makes  all  the  Oxford  and  Cambridge  staffs  ipso 
facto  members  of  its  own.  If  a  London  centre 
desires  to  do  so,  it  may,  through  the  London  office 
therefore,  make  an  offer  of  employment  to  almost 
any  extension  lecturer  in  England.  So  far  as 
we  know  the  payments  to  lecturers  are  in  all  cases 
by  fees,  not  by  stipend. 

THE  CENTRAL  OFFICES. 

We  have  already  looked  at  Extension  from  the 
point  of  view  of  the  Student,  let  us  now  consider 
it  from  that  of  the  central  organizing  Secretary 
and  the  Lecturer. 

By  far  the  greater  number  of  courses  are  de- 
livered in  the  winter  months.  The  session  ex- 
tends from  September  to  April,  and  is  divided  into 
two  parts  by  the  Christmas  holidays.  Hence  the 
busy  time  in  the  office  is  the  late  spring  and  the 


14  UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS    IT   IS. 

early  summer,  when  most  of  the  arrangements  are 
made  for  the  coming  winter,  and  the  report  on  the 
past  one  is  prepared.  Details  of  organization  differ 
in  the  different  offices,  we  therefore  confine  our- 
selves to  the  Oxford  method,  with  which  the  others 
agree  in  the  main  outlines.  In  March  a  c  file '  of 
papers  is  sent  out  to  every  established  centre.  It  in- 
cludes a  list  of  lecturers  and  of  their  subjects,  and 
a  form  of  application,  on  which  the  Local  Secretary 
is  to  state  in  order  of  preference,  the  first,  second, 
and  third  choice  of  his  committee  in  the  matter  of 
lecturers  for  the  following  autumn  and  spring. 
This  form  has  to  be  returned  to  Oxford  by  a 
certain  day  in  April.  When  the  applications  are 
in,  they  are  digested  by  the  Secretary,  and  the 
lecturers  are  consulted  in  order  of  the  choice  ex- 
pressed by  the  centre.  The  senior  having  selected 
from  the  offers  in  which  he  stands  first,  those  which 
he  can  find  time  for  and  which  the  railways  allow 
of  easy  grouping,  the  remainder  are  passed  on.  The 
second  will  have  before  him  his  own  first  offers,  and 
those  offers  in  which  he  stands  second,  but  which 
have  been  refused  by  the  lecturer  first  named.  This 
process  is  repeated  by  the  third,  and  so  on.  Thus 
the  groundwork  of  the  next  year's  arrangement  is 
easily  prepared.  There  is  always,  however,  a  resi- 
duum of  centres  whose  applications  come  late,  who 
desire  one  particular  lecturer  and  refuse  any  other, 
or  who  refuse  to  work  amicably  with  their  rail- 
way neighbours,  and  so  cannot  be  placed  in  a 


UNIVERSITY    EXTENSION   AS    IT    IS.  15 

circuit  round  which  a  lecturer  travels  weekly  or 
fortnightly.  After  much  negotiation  these  are 
fitted  in.  At  last,  in  July,  the  list  for  the  coming 
winter  is  completed.  It  shows  certain  gaps  ;  and 
new  centres,  which  are  started  at  all  times  of  the 
year,  must  either  take  a  less  experienced  lecturer, 
who  has  as  yet  little  work,  or  must  take  advantage 
of  a  gap — in  other  words,  must  forego  choice  and 
take  the  lecturer  who  happens  to  be  near  them 
and  free. 

THE  LECTURERS. 

The  Lecturers  are  of  two  types,  men  of  standing, 
who,  watching  the  growth  of  the  extension  scheme, 
have  seen  it  to  their  advantage  to  seek  a  place  in 
its  j^ersonnel,  and  young  men  with  as  yet  merely 
academic  honours.  The  former  are  an  important 
minority,  but  we  need  not  here  further  consider 
them.  Of  the  latter,  most;  no  doubt,  look  on  Ex- 
tension as  a  temporary  occupation  ;  a  few,  how- 
ever, who  have  met  with  marked  success,  are  treat- 
ing it  as  one  of  the  chief  chapters  in  their  life.  Of 
the  Lecturers  whose  whole  career  has  so  far  been 
in  connection  with  the  Extension,  the  most  promi- 
nent are  Mr.  R.  G.  Moulton  of  Cambridge  and  the 
Eev.  W.  Hudson  Shaw  of  Oxford.  The  chief  diffi- 
culty in  the  way  of  long  service  is  the  undeniably 
arduous  character  of  the  work.  A  lecturer  in  full 
employment  lectures  on  five  evenings  in  the  week 


16  UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS    IT   IS. 

and  on  three  or  four  afternoons  as  well.  Each 
lecture  and  class  requires  two  hours  of  concen- 
trated effort  and  attention.  In  addition  there  are 
the  students'  papers  to  be  corrected,  to  the  number 
of  say  200  a  week.  This  lasts  for  twelve  weeks  in 
the  autumn  and  is  renewed  for  twelve  weeks  in 
the  spring.  Besides  actual  work,  there  are  the  long 
journeys  by  rail  and  the  absence  from  home  for 
the  greater  part  of  the  week.  More  than  one 
lecturer  has  had  to  travel  j  0,000  miles  in  a 
session.  On  the  other  hand,  there  is  abundance 
of  stimulus, — there  is  the  constant  interest  of 
touch  with  new  audiences  and  new  individuals, 
there  are  wonderful  opportunities  for  learning 
the  many  phases  of  English  social  life  and 
the  many  aspects  of  the  country,  and  there  is 
the  delightful  experience  of  almost  unvarying 
hospitality  and  consideration.  There  are  long 
holidays  free  for  travelling  and  for  literary  work, 
for  taking  in  and  arranging  what  is  to  be  given 
out  in  the  following  session.  Still  the  wear  and 
tear  is  such,  that  the  best  men,  the  men  with  their 
hearts  in  the  cause,  are  constantly  tempted  to 
accept  the  easier  positions,  which  the  publicity  of 
their  work  ensures  to  them.  It  speaks  volumes 
for  their  devotion  that  one  of  them,  in  Holy  Orders, 
recently  refused  a  living  in  the  Church  of  £1200 
a  year.  The  largest  income  ever  yet  made  by  ex- 
tension work  is  probably  between  £500  and  £600,, 
and  that  by  a  man  of  most  uncommon  powers  of 


UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION    AS   IT   IS.  17 

endurance.  The  problem  of  the  future,  so  far  as 
the  lecturers  are  concerned,  is  so  to  reduce  their 
work  and  their  travelling,  and  so  to  increase  their 
emoluments  as  to  make  it  worth  the  while  of  an 
able  man  to  refuse  preferment  for  at  least  ten  or 
fifteen  years  after  the  completion  of  his  University 
course.  We  want  the  whole  time  and  vigour  of 
many  men  of  experience  and  energy,  not  only  the 
temporary  services  of  young  men  who  are  waiting 
at  the  gates  of  the  professions. 

STATISTICS. 

Such  is  the  nature  of  the  University  Extension 
method  and  personnel.  We  have  next  to  grasp  the 
scale  on  which  they  are  at  present  employed. 

In  the  session  1 889-90 1J  148  courses  of  lectures 
were  delivered  in  connection  with  Oxford,  125 
in  connection  with  Cambridge,  107  in  connection 
with  London.  The  Victoria  University  pub- 
lishes no  annual  report,  but  since  during  the  last 
three  years  twenty-one  courses  have  been  under  its 
management,  we  may  safely  add  to  our  numbers 
for  the  session  1889-90,  seven  courses.  This  gives 
us  a  total  of  387  courses.  The  average  number  of 
lectures  in  a  course  has  been,  for  Oxford  between 
seven  and  eight,  for  Cambridge  and  London  just 

1  The  following  reports  are  referred  to  in  this  section  : — Oxford, 
sessions  1885-6,  1889-90;  Cambridge,  sessions  1885-6,  1889-90; 
London,  1885  and  1889;  Victoria,  Report  for  1887-90. 

C 


18  UNIVEESITY   EXTENSION   AS    IT  IS. 

under  twelve.  We  may  therefore  assume  an 
average  all  round  of  ten.  We  have  thus  a  total 
of  3870  lectures  in  one  session,  and  this  without 
counting  more  than  100  in  the  Oxford  Summer 
Meeting. 

In  the  same  session  17,904  people  attended  the  Ox- 
ford courses,  11,301  the  Cambridge  courses,  10,982 
the  London  courses.  In  three  years  the  Victoria 
courses  were  attended  by  about  2730,  giving  us  a 
yearly  average  of  910  to  be  reckoned  to  the  total 
for  1889-90.  Irrespective  of  more  than  1000  mem- 
bers of  the  Oxford  Summer  Meeting,  we  have  a 
grand  total  of  41,097  attendants  at  the  courses  in 
one  session.  The  word  c  course '  has  been  used  rather 
than  lectures  to  indicate  the  meaning  of  these 
figures.  The  attendance  at  each  lecture  is  noted. 
The  average  attendance  at  each  lecture  of  a  course 
can  thus  be  found,  and  the  averages  of  all  the 
courses,  added  together,  give  the  above  numbers. 
It  should  be  observed  that  the  statistics  of  the 
different  authorities  are  not  collected  on  quite  the 
same  principles.  The  London  Society  gives  '  entries 
for  courses '  instead  of  '  average  attendances/  but 
this  probably  vitiates  the  figures  only  very  slightly. 

The  total  number  of  students  examined  is  not 
attainable.  In  the  case  of  Cambridge  it  is  returned 
at  1734  for  the  last  session.  Oxford  and  London 
only  publish  the  numbers  of  certificates  awarded, 
953  in  the  case  of  Oxford,  1361  in  that  of  London. 
Even  these  figures  are  not  quite  complete,  for  at 


UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS   IT   IS.  19 

the  date  of  publication,  in  all  three  cases,  certain 
of  the  examinations  were  not  over.  We  shall 
therefore  be  well  within  the  mark  if  we  say  that 
4300  or  over  ten  per  cent,  of  the  audiences  were 
examined.  If  we  bear  in  mind  the  facts  that 
the  audiences  are  largely  composed  of  adults,  and 
that  the  certificate  has  a  direct  use  only  for  a  few 
people,  this  is  not  an  unsatisfactory  result.  The 
smallness  of  the  number  in  the  case  of  Oxford  is 
explained  by  the  newness  of  most  of  the  Oxford 
centres.  In  all  cases,  many  of  the  best  students 
refuse  to  submit  themselves  to  examination,  and 
we  must  allow  that  examination  is  not  the  end  in 
view  in  University  Extension,  only  a  very  valuable 
method  of  inciting  to  thoroughness  of  work. 

The  number  of  lecturers  actually  employed  in 
the  session  1889-90  was  in  London  30,  by  the  Ox- 
ford scheme  24,  by  the  Cambridge  scheme  also  24. 
Since  eight  of  those  who  lectured  in  London  also 
lectured  in  the  country  for  Cambridge,  and  two 
also  for  Oxford,  the  total  number  of  lecturers  em- 
ployed was  sixty-eight.  On  an  average  they  de- 
livered nearly  six  courses  each,  without  counting 
Victoria,  for  which  we  have  no  returns  under  this 
head. 

The  number  of  towns  in  which  the  lectures  were 
delivered  cannot  be  accurately  stated  owing  to  the 
difficulty  of  separating  suburbs  from  their  cities. 
The  maps  at  the  end  of  the  book  will,  however, 
give  a  very  fair  idea  of  the  distribution  of  the  work. 
c  3 


20  UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS   IT   IS. 

The  first  shows  the  towns  in  which  Oxford  lectures 
were  delivered  in  the  session  1889-90.  The  second 
is  a  similar  map  for  Cambridge.  It  should  be  remem- 
bered that  at  present,  owing  to  various  circum- 
stances, mainly  financial  difficulties,  some  centres 
are  intermittent,  and  for  this  reason  some  names 
are  absent  from  the  maps  in  this  particular  year, 
though  in  another  they  might  have  appeared. 
Broadly,  Oxford  and  Cambridge  predominate  re- 
spectively on  their  two  sides  of  the  country.  The 
exceptions  are  due  to  various  causes,  the  chief  being 
the  personal  connexion  with  one  or  other  of  some 
prime  mover  in  a  neighbourhood,  and  secondly,  the 
occasional  failure  of  a  lecturer,  a  discouragement 
which  both  schemes  have  sometimes  to  encounter, 
and  which  not  unfrequently  leads  to  a  transfer  of 
allegiance  to  the  rival  university. 

GROWTH  DURING  THE  LAST  FIVE  YEARS. 

The  third  map  shows  the  general  state  of  Uni- 
versity Extension  in  1889-90.  The  outlying  Lon- 
don centres  are  shown  by  crosses,  the  remainder 
are  indicated  by  the  number  placed  against  the 
word  Londc^n.  All  the  remaining  centres  are 
Oxford  or  Cambridge. 

The  statistics  just  given  belong  only  to  the 
moment.  The  present  is  a  time  of  immense  in- 
crease. We  have  at  our  command  numbers  bear- 
ing on  the  future  in  the  case  only  of  Oxford. 


UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS   IT   IS. 


21 


Already  ninety-one  courses  have  been  arranged  for 
the  autumn  term  of  this  year,  and  the  number  is 
still  increasing.  The  number  delivered  in  the 
autumn  term  of  last  year  was  seventy-nine. 

The  fourth  map  will  enable  us  to  grasp  the 
growth  in  the  immediate  past.  It  is  constructed  on 
the  same  principle  as  the  third,  except  that  the 
Oxford  centres  are  distinguished  by  stars. 

Below  we  have  in  tabular  form  the  contrast 
between  the  present  and  five  years  ago. 


OXFORD. 

CAMBRIDGE. 

LONDON. 

TOTAL. 

Courses  delivered  1  :  — 
1885-1886 
1889-1890 

27 
148 

82 
125 

63 

107 

172 

380 

Average  attendances  1  :- 

1885-1886 
1889-1890 

3000 
17,904 

8557 
11,301 

5*95 
10,982 

16,752 
40,187 

University  Extension  in  England  has  much  more 
than  doubled  in  the  last  five  years.  Five  years 
ago  Oxford  had  only  just  entered  the  field  as 
a  serious  competitor.  There  can  be  no  question 
that  both  directly  by  her  efforts  and  indirectly  by 
her  competition,  Oxford  has  done  much  to  atone  for 
her  earlier  inaction.  We  shall  have  to  refer  to 
these  figures  again  later  on,  especially  with  regard 
to  certain  controversial  points. 

In  the  last  five  years  University  Extension  has 

1  In  the  case  of  London  the  numbers  are  for  1885  and  1889. 


22  UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS   IT   IS. 

been  started  in  Scotland,  in  Ireland,  in  America, 
and  in  Australia.  Official  enquiries  have  also  come 
from  France  and  India. 


FINANCE. 

A  complete  statement  of  the  financial  condition 
of  the  movement  cannot  be  given  for  lack  of  pub- 
lished materials.  The  following  facts  may  how- 
ever be  of  service. 

During  the  last  five  years,  local  committees  have 
expended  on  Oxford  courses  (exclusive  of  local 
expenses)  -£13,238  ;  of  this  amount  £7760  has 
been  spent  during  the  last  two  years l.  If  we 
estimate  the  local  expenses  at  £10  a  course,  which 
on  the  average  cannot  be  far  from  the  mark,  then 
in  the  last  five  years  we  have  a  local  expenditure 
of  about  ^4530  on  453  courses.  In  addition,  the 
University  has  granted  during  the  same  period 
for  office  expenses  sums  amounting  to  ^1700 
besides  an  office  rent-free2.  The  Oxford  Eeport 
states  that  the  Clarendon  Press  has  also  rendered 
substantial  assistance  in  the  printing  of  syllabuses. 
A  special  fund  of  ^600  has  been  raised  by  sub- 
scription and  spent  on  the  subsidising  of  a  senior 
lecturer.  A  great  number  of  books  were  presented 
by  publishers  and  others  when  the  Travelling 

1  Cf.  Oxford  Official  Circular  on  University  Extension,  1890. 

2  Oxford  University  Extension  Accounts  presented  to  the  Uni- 
versity, 1885-1889. 


UNIVEKSITY   EXTENSION   AS   IT   IS.  23 

Libraries  were  first  started.  These  have  been  the 
chief  items  of  income  in  the  Oxford  accounts  for 
five  years. 

The  total  cost  of  the  Oxford  system  under  all 
the  above  heads  during  the  year  1889-90  may  be 
set  down  at  about  £7000. 

The  balance  sheet  of  the  London  Society  for 
1889  shows  an  income  of  about  £3500,  including 
nearly  £800  by  subscriptions,  and  an  expenditure 
also  of  about  £3500.  The  local  expenses  are  in 
London  rather  less  than  in  the  country,  owing  to 
the  sinallness  of  the  item  for  the  travelling  of  the 
Lecturer.  If  we  put  them  at  ,^8  a  course,  we  shall 
have  to  add  for  local  expenses  say  ^850,  making 
the  total  annual  cost  of  the  London  scheme  about 
£4350. 

We  have  no  figures  accessible  for  Cambridge, 
but  as  the  Cambridge  courses  on  the  average  are 
longer  than  those  of  Oxford,  we  may  perhaps  set  the 
annual  cost  down  at  £7500. 

Let  us  add,  say,  £2,50  for  the  Victoria  University. 

Thus  our  rough  estimate  of  the  present  annual 
cost  of  University  Extension  stands  thus : — 

Oxford  £7000 
Cambridge  7500 
London  435o 
Victoria  250 


Total     £19.100 


24  UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS    IT   IS. 

or  less  than  ten  shillings  a  head  on  the  total 
average  attendance1.  If  we  put  the  average 
number  of  lectures  in  a  course  at  ten,  we  have 
a  cost  of  a  shilling  a  lecture  for  each  attendant, 
and  this  includes,  besides  the  lecture,  the  right 
to  attend  the  class,  to  have  an  essay  corrected, 
in  most  cases  to  sit  for  examination  and,  if  suc- 
cessful, to  receive  a  certificate.  In  the  case  of 
Oxford  it  further  includes  the  use  of  a  small 
library. 

We  venture  on  the  assertion  that  University 
Extension,  as  it  exists,  is  one  of  the  cheapest 
educational  institutions  in  this  country. 


NEW  DEVELOPMENTS. 

Hitherto  we  have  spoken  of  the  Central  authori- 
ties, the  Lecturers  and  the  Centres,  in  fact  of  the  esta- 
blished system  of  Extension.  Our  account  would  be 
very  incomplete,  however,  without  some  reference 
to  a  number  of  experiments  belonging  to  the  last 
two  or  three  years,  experiments  whose  general 
tendency  may  be  best  described  as  the  bracing  up 
of  the  system.  It  had  hitherto  consisted  of  a  number 
of  isolated  centres  which  slept  during  the  summer 
months,  and  which  regarded  the  Universities  merely 

1  This  is  an  average  only.  While  some  centres  flourish,  others  are 
struggling.  See  on  this  point  Chapter  III. 


UNIVEBS1TY   EXTENSION   AS    IT   IS.  25 

as  purveyors  of  lecturers  and  examiners.  The  effect 
of  the  new  growths  will  be  to  make  continuous  the 
life  of  the  centres,  to  bind  the  centres  to  one  another 
and  to  bring  them  nearer  to  the  University. 

We  have  already  stated  that  the  normal  Exten- 
sion session  consists  of  two  terms,  each  of  twelve 
weeks,  the  one  before,  the  other  after  Christmas. 
For  a  long  time  it  was  assumed  that  the  public 
cared  only  to  be  taught  in  the  long  evenings  of  the 
winter.  Recently,  however,  a  most  unexpected 
demand  has  arisen  for  courses  in  the  early  summer. 
The  London  Report  for  1889  shows  no  fewer  than 
thirteen  summer  courses.  In  the  present  year  four 
summer  courses  have  been  given  for  Oxford,  and 
already  four  have  been  arranged  for  the  summer  of 
1891.  Thus  part  at  least  of  the  long  gap  seems  to 
be  bridged  over  during  which  enthusiasm  cooled 
and  habits  of  study  declined. 

Largely  owing  to  Mr.  R.  G.  Moulton's  initiative, 
Students'  Associations  were  started  in  a  few  Cam- 
bridge centres  some  years  ago.  At  first  the  idea 
seemed  very  difficult  of  realisation,  but  experience 
was  gradually  gathered,  and  within  the  last  year 
or  so  there  has  been  a  great  increase  of  such  asso- 
ciations. A  Students'  Association  is  now  the  usual 
mark  of  a  good  centre.  No  fewer  than  thirty-six 
have  been  founded  in  1889-90  in  the  Oxford 
centres  alone1.  Their  objects  are  to  hold  the 
*  students '  together,  to  engender  esprit  de  corps,  to 

1  Oxford  Keport,  1890. 


26  UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS    IT   IS. 

prepare  for  courses  announced,  to  hold  discussions 
on  difficult  points  during  their  delivery,  to  continue 
supplementary  study  when  they  are  over,  and  to 
organize  scientific  and  historical  excursions  in 
the  summer.  Their  standing  organization  may 
obviously  be  adapted  to  many  purposes  in  the 
future. 

Partly  in  connection  with  Students'  Associations 
and  partly  not,  each  of  the  three  great  Extensions 
has  started  a  scheme  for  what  is  known  as  Home 
Heading  Circles.  The  idea  was  that  isolated  students 
in  small  places  out  of  reach  of  an  Extension  centre, 
and  Extension  students  in  the  off-season,  should 
join  a  circle  to  read  on  some  definite  subject  under 
the  leadership  of  an  expert.  The  members  sent 
periodical  essays  to  the  leader  of  the  circle.  The 
scheme  had  the  advantage  of  reaching  the  isolated 
units  in  the  villages.  It  seemed  a  promising  new 
development.  An  elaborate  apparatus  was  con- 
trived, a  system  of  adhesive  stamps  for  the  pre- 
payment of  the  fees  on  essays  came  from  the  Oxford 
Office,  but  somehow  the  idea  hung  fire  1.  It  may 
be  that  to  some  extent  summer  courses  leave 
little  room  for  it.  It  seems  more  probable,  how- 
ever, that  it  lacks  the^  essential  element  of  success. 
Reading  and  writing  require  the  stimulus  and 
corrective  of  living  touch  with  the  teacher.  It  is 
only  fair  to  say,  however,  that  an  independent 
organization,  the  National  Home  Reading  Union, 

1  See  Oxford  Keport,  1890. 


UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS   IT   IS.  27 

after  a  period  of  comparative  failure,  has  now  7000 
members.  Were  University  Extension  Lectures 
made  cheaper,  and  the  centres  far  more  numerous, 
we  doubt  whether  any  scheme  for  associated  study 
would  succeed  which  did  not  include  face  to  face 
intercourse  with  a  teacher. 


THE  FEDERATION  OF  CENTRES. 

The  linking  together  of  neighbouring  centres  has 
recently  begun  to  make  some  progress.  The  first 
district  federation  formed  was  the  South  Eastern. 
It  now  includes  most  of  the  centres,  both  Oxford 
and  Cambridge,  in  Surrey,  Kent,  Sussex,  and 
Hampshire.  It  has  been  followed  by  a  South 
Western  Federation  in  Cornwall,  Devon,  and  So- 
merset, a  Yorkshire  Federation,  and  a  Northern 
Federation  in  the  four  northern  counties.  The 
greatest  advantage  which  has  as  yet  come  from 
the  rise  of  the  federations  is  the  breaking  down  of 
the  barrier  between  the  Oxford  and  the  Cambridge 
centres.  The  personal  acquaintance  of  neighbour- 
ing local  secretaries  removes  many  difficulties  of 
organization.  Both  Universities  have  offered  re- 
duced terms  to  federations  which  can  form  con- 
venient circuits  for  the  lecturers. 


28  UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS   IT   IS. 


AFFILIATION  OF  CENTRES  TO  THE  UNIVERSITIES. 

The  binding  of  the  centres  to  the  University  has 
been  promoted  in  two  different  ways  ;  by  the  offer- 
ing of  special  advantages  to  a  centre1  which  submits 
to  the  more  definite  guidance  of  its  studies  by  the 
University,  and  by  the  invitation  of  the  students 
to  reside  for  a  short  time  in  the  University  itself. 
Cambridge  has  led  the  way  with  the  former,  Ox- 
ford with  the  latter. 

The  old  Universities  have  now  for  some  ten 
years  affiliated  local  colleges,  and  granted  to  their 
students  certain  privileges,  the  most  important  of 
which  is  the  remission,  on  certain  conditions,  of 
one  out  of  the  three  years  of  residence  necessary 
to  a  degree.  The  Colleges  affiliated  to  Oxford  are 
Lampeter,  Nottingham,  and  Sheffield.  Cambridge 
has  lately  extended  affiliation  to  those  Extension 
centres  which  undertake  a  systematic  course  of 
lectures  on  Science  and  Literature  extending  over 
a  period  of  four  years.  The  Centres  that  have  as 
yet  availed  themselves  of  this  permission  are  Hull, 
Scarborough,  Newcastle  -  on  -  Tyne,  Sunderland, 
Derby,  Exeter,  and  Plymouth  l. 

Oxford  has  not  followed  suit  in  this  matter, 
though  she  seeks  to  encourage  continuity  of  work 
by  offering  Higher  Certificates  of  systematic  study2. 

1  Cambridge  Report,  1889-90. 

2  The  London  Society  also  otfers  special  Certificates  of  Continuous 
Study. 


TJNIVEESITY   EXTENSION   AS   IT   IS.  29 

The  conditions  which  must  be  complied  with  to 
obtain  these  certificates  are  practically  identical 
with  those  demanded  in  the  Cambridge  Affiliated 
Centres,  but  Oxford  remits  no  year  of  residence. 
This,  on  the  whole,  we  regret,  though  we  much 
doubt  whether  any  but  an  infinitesimal  percentage 
of  the  students  would  avail  themselves  of  the 
privilege  even  if  granted.  Its  value  lies  chiefly 
in  the  definite  stamp  which  it  gives  to  the  Higher 
Certificate.  The  Extension  student  is  as  a  rule 
already  pledged  to  a  career  in  life.  Two  years  of 
residence  are  to  him  just  as  prohibitory  as  three. 
We  look  for  the  element  of  residence  not  to  any 
remissions  in  the  normal  University  course,  but 
rather  to  the  development  of  the  Oxford  Summer 
Meeting  into  a  resident  Summer  University.  We 
are  bound  to  admit,  however,  that  this  is  merely 
an  opinion  based  on  considerable  knowledge  of 
Extension  students.  The  Cambridge  Affiliation 
Scheme  has  been  in  force  for  too  short  a  time 
to  give  us  any  ascertained  statistics  on  the  point. 


SUMMEE  MEETINGS. 

The  Summer  meetings  are  certainly  the  most 
striking  of  all  the  recent  developments.  The 
history  of  their  origin  will  be  stated  on  a  later 
page.  Here  we  shall  merely  describe  their  work, 
and  point  out  their  place  in  the  general  scheme 


30  UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS   IT   IS. 

of  University  Extension.  The  first  Summer  meet- 
ing was  held  at  Oxford  in  August,  I8881.  It 
lasted  ten  days,  and  was  attended  by  900  students. 
Short  courses  of  from  three  to  six  lectures  were 
delivered  in  the  mornings,  while  the  evenings  were 
devoted  to  addresses  by  eminent  men  on  literary 
and  scientific  subjects.  The  opportunity  was 
taken  of  holding  conferences  of  the  local  secretaries 
and  other  organizers  who  happened  to  be  present, 
and  there  can  be  no  question  but  that  the  move- 
ment has  greatly  benefited  by  the  ideas  then  struck 
out.  The  foundation  of  many  new  centres  is  di- 
rectly traceable  to  the  enthusiasm  of  this  meeting. 
It  was  thrown  impartially  open  alike  to  Oxford, 
Cambridge  and  London  students. 

The  first  experiment  having  succeeded,  it  having 
been  proved  that,  if  invited,  the  students  would 
come  to  the  University,  the  next  point  was  to  keep 
them  in  residence  for  a  longer  time.  The  second 
meeting  in  August,  1889,  was  announced  to  consist 
of  two  *  parts ' 2,  of  which  Part  I  was  in  all  essential 
respects  to  resemble  the  meeting  of  1888.  Part  II 
was  to  be  open  to  those  students  who  could  afford 
to  remain  on  for  an  additional  period  of  three  weeks. 
It  was  to  be  devoted  to  quiet  study  and  would 
lack  most  of  the  element  of  intellectual  dissipation 
which  enlivened  Part  I.  1000  students  came  to 
Part  I,  no  fewer  than  150  remained  on  for  Part  II. 

1  Eeport  of  Oxford  Summer  MeetiDg,  1888. 

2  Ibid.,  1889. 


UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS    IT   IS.  31 

On  all  hands  it  was  admitted  that  both  parts  were 
successes.  As  with  the  Winter  courses  in  the 
centres,  so  with  the  Summer  meeting  at  Oxford, 
several  different  classes  of  people  with  their  dif- 
ferent wants  had  to  be  kept  in  view.  Of  course 
those  who  stayed  for  the  whole  month  may  be 
assumed  to  have  gained  the  most,  but  we  protest 
against  the  idea  that  Part  I  was  the  mere  intellectual 
orgy  which  a  few  people  who  were  not  present 
have  chosen  to  think  it.  Several  hundred  of  the 
students  were  teachers  who  came  for  new  ideas  and 
new  methods  which  should  throw  a  new  life  into 
their  teaching.  As  in  the  earlier  year,  many  new 
centres  derived  their  impulse  from  Part  I.  We 
have  therefore  facts,  as  well  as  opinions,  tending  to 
show  that  the  work  then  begun  was,  in  not  a  few 
cases,  continued  with  perseverance.  Oxford  is  about 
to  hold  a  third  meeting,  but  the  feature  of  the 
present  year  is  that  Cambridge  has  also  entered  the 
new  field.  Owing  to  the  circumstances  that  many 
Undergraduates  reside  at  Cambridge  during  the 
long  vacation,  and  that  Cambridge  has  not  yet 
a  splendid  group  of  halls  as  fitted  for  the  purpose 
as  the  Oxford  Examination  Schools,  the  sister 
University  cannot  undertake  a  great  meeting  simi- 
lar to  the  Oxford  Part  I.  Forty  students  have, 
however,  assembled  for  a  month's  study  in  her  lec- 
ture-rooms, libraries,  laboratories,  and  art-galleries. 
The  idea  of  such  a  Summer  meeting  has  been  very 
contagious.  The  National  Home  Beading  Union 


32  UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS    IT   IS. 

held  a  successful  gathering  at  Blackpool  both  this 
year  and  last.  Edinburgh,  it  may  be  mentioned, 
has  tried  to  acclimatise  the  scheme  in  Scotland. 
But,  obviously,  no  place  has  the  same  available 
wealth  of  educational  appliances  that  are  to  be 
found  idle  and  ready  to  hand  at  Oxford  in  the 
months  of  July,  August,  and  September. 


SCHOLARSHIPS. 

There  is  one  feature  in  connection  with  these 
meetings  which  is,  as  yet,  little  developed,  but  which 
has  great  significance.  Ten  days  at  Oxford,  even 
when  the  lodgings  are  put  on  tariff,  together  with 
the  travelling  to  and  from  the  University,  imply 
an  expenditure  of  about  £$,  the  whole  month  one 
of  J^io1.  To  poorer  Extension  students  these  are 
prohibitive  sums.  After  the  first  meeting,  several 
subscribers  came  forward  with  the  offer  of  scholar- 
ships for  poor  students  tenable  at  the  second 
meeting.  These  scholarships  were  given  to  Oxford 
Extension  students  who  had  qualified  by  attending 
certain  courses  of  lectures  in  the  centres  in  the 
winter.  They  were  awarded  on  the  results  of 
a  competition  of  essays,  among  others  to  two  car- 
penters, two  clerks,  a  fustian  weaver,  a  dockyard 
artisan,  and  three  elementary  teachers  2.  This  year, 

1  Oxford  Summer  Meeting  Programme,  1890. 
8  Oxford  Extension  Report,  1890. 


UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS    IT   IS.  33 

the  number  of  the  scholarships,  by  the  kindness  of 
the  donors,  has  been  increased,  and  there  will  be 
present  in  Oxford  this  month  more  than  twenty 
comparatively  poor  people  holding  scholarships  of 
<^5  or  j£Jio.  Of  these  at  least  six  are  working 
men,  and  at  least  four  elementary  teachers1.  These 
numbers  do  not  include  scholarships  tenable  at  the 
Oxford  and  Cambridge  meetings  which  have  been 
given  to  London  Students. 

The  report  of  the  Examiners  who  awarded  the 
Oxford  Scholarships,  indicating  as  it  does  the 
standard  of  excellence  reached  by  the  poorer  stu- 
dents of  the  Extension,  is  worth  reproducing  in 
extenso 2. 

'  There  has  been  a  great  increase  in  the  number 
of  essays  sent  in,  and  the  high  level  reached  in  the 
competition  last  year  has  been  fully  maintained. 

'  The  historical  and  other  essays  written  by  work- 

•/  j 

ing  men  are  worthy  of  special  praise. 

'In  science,  the  number  of  good  and  deserving 
essays  was  far  in  advance  of  anything  experienced 
in  previous  years.  The  best  essays  were  extremely 
good,  and  proved  that  very  hard  and  conscientious 
work  had  been  done.  The  majority  of  the  essays 
were  up  to  Scholarship  standard. 

'  The  best  essay  written  on  the  literary  subject 
showed  a  remarkable  amount  of  reading  and 
thought,  but  the  Examiners  regret  that  more  essays 

1  Oxford  Official  Circular  for  University  Extension,  1890. 

2  Ibid. 


34  UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS    IT    IS. 

were    not   written   on    the    subjects   drawn   from 
English  Literature. 

J.  FRANCE  BRIGHT. 

(Master  of  University  College.) 

A.    SlDGWICK. 

(Fellow  and  Tutor  of  Corpus  Christi  College.} 

L.  R.  PHELPS. 

(Fellow  and  Tutor  of  Oriel  College.} 

E.    B.    POULTON. 

(F.R.S.,  Late  Lecturer  at  Keble  and  Jesus  Colleges.)' 

EXTENSION  JOURNALISM  AND  LITERATURE. 

The  various  recent  developments  which  we  have 
now  described,  the  Summer  Courses,  the  Students' 
Associations,  the  Home  Reading  Circles,  the  Fede- 
rations of  Centres,  the  Affiliated  Centres  and  the 
Summer  Meetings  have  all  helped  to  make  Ex- 
tension a  constantly  present  factor  in  the  life 
of  the  student,  and  to  create  an  Extension 
'  public.'  Hence  the  newest  feature  of  all,  a 
sudden  growth  of  Extension  Literature,  both 
newspapers  and  books.  Oxford  led  the  way  last 
year  with  a  tentative  effort,  a  circular  issued  from 
time  to  time  giving  the  latest  arrangements.  The 
object  was  the  modest  one  of  saving  a  large 
amount  of  letter-writing  in  the  office.  Then  the 
South  Western  Association  began  to  issue  a  small 
journal  of  its  own.  This  appears  quarterly  at 


UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS    IT    IS.  35 

Exeter.  In  February  this  year  a  Monthly  Maga- 
zine was  started  in  London,  entitled  the  University 
Extension  Journal.  Though  it  claims  to  represent 
the  whole  movement,  it  is  managed  by  the  London 
Society,  and  a  large  part  of  it  is  taken  up  with  that 
Society's  official  announcements.  It  is  understood 
that  the  Oxford  Delegates  have,  therefore,  decided 
to  convert  their  private  circular  into  a  Monthly 
Magazine.  Perhaps  at  some  later  stage,  when  the 
movement  has  been  given  greater  consistency  and 
unity,  these  various  organs  may  find  it  to  their 
interest  to  unite. 

Finally,  Mr.  John  Murray  has  announced  his 
intention  of  issuing  a  series  of  University  Exten- 
sion Manuals  under  the  editorship  of  Professor 
Knight  of  St.  Andrews.  Several  other  publishers 
are  understood  to  be  preparing  to  follow  his 
example. 


THE  DIFFERENT  CLASSES  OF  STUDENTS. 

In  our  introduction  we  linked  Extension  with 
Elementary  Education  and  the  Public  Library. 
We  sketched  an  ideal  based  on  the  conception  that 
Extension  is  to  be  the  university  of  the  toiling 
millions.  We  are  quite  prepared,  therefore,  for  the 
criticism  that  Extension  so  far  has  belonged  to  the 
middle  class,  and  above  all  to  the  women.  We 
even  admit  the  truth  of  the  criticism,  and,  so  far 

D  2 


36  UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS    IT   IS. 

as  it  goes,  glory  in  it.  We  are  especially  proud  of 
the  part  Extension  is  taking  in  the  great  move- 
ment for  the  education  of  women.  Men  have  far 
fewer  difficulties  in  getting  touch  with  living 
knowledge  than  have  women,  and  the  Extension 
system  comes,  therefore,  as  an  especial  boon  to  the 
women  of  the  middle  and  even  the  upper  classes. 
But  we  believe  in  the  flexibility  of  the  Extension 
system,  and  we  believe  that  that  flexibility  will  be 
put  to  the  chief  test  when  it  comes  to  be  applied 
on  the  grand  scale  to  the  higher  education  of  the 
masses.  We  wished,  therefore,  to  turn  the  reader's 
attention  to  this  aspect  of  the  movement  from  the 
very  outset  of  our  discussion.  This  is  a  matter  to 
which  we  shall  have  to  recur ;  let  us  here  merely 
ask  what  classes  are  actually  being  reached  ? 

Many  courses  of  lectures  are  delivered  in  the 
afternoon.  Probably  90  per  cent,  of  the  audiences 
at  these  are  ladies  of  leisure  and  older  schoolgirls. 
These  are  the  audiences  which  are  the  chief  cause 
of  the  derision  of  the  narrower  type  of  educational 
enthusiast.  He  forgets,  in  his  anxiety  for  the 
working  men,  that  all  classes  should  move  forward 
together,  and  that  many  of  those  who  have  what 
are  called  the  'accomplishments/  have  had  very 
few  opportunities  of  acquiring  some  of  the  broader 
culture  on  which  generous  and  tolerant  views  of 
life  are  based.  We  have,  personally,  been  told 
several  times  by  shrewd  observers,  of  a  change  for 
the  better  in  the  conversation  and  social  tone  of 


UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS   IT   IS.  37 

some  suburb  of  a  manufacturing  town,  as  the  result 
of  the  delivery  of  a  course  of  Extension  lectures. 

A  few  courses  are  delivered  at  local  colleges  and 
other  fixed  seats  of  learning.  Cambridge  Extension 
Lecturers  do  much  of  the  work  at  University  College, 
Nottingham1.  Oxford  has  much  of  the  Literary 
teaching  at  the  Huddersfield  Technical  School2. 
The  London  Society  gives  lectures  at  the  Birkbeck 
Institute,  Gresham  College,  and  the  Eoyal  Holloway 
College,  Egham 3.  This  is  an  important  point  to 
note  when  we  come  to  deal  with  the  project  of 
state  aid. 

The  great  majority  of  courses  are  delivered  in 
the  evening  to  audiences  composed  in  the  main 
either  of  tradesmen  and  their  families  or  of  work- 
ing men.  These  are  the  rank  and  file  of  Extension 
centres,  and  our  quarrel  is  not  that  the  tradesmen 
centres  are  too  numerous,  but  that  the  working- 
men  centres  are  too  few.  What  has  already  been 
done  is,  however,  enough  to  show  that  if  the  right 
kind  of  teacher  is  forthcoming,  and  the  financial 
difficulties  are  surmounted,  the  working  men  are 
quite  ready  to  avail  themselves  of  opportunities. 
During  the  last  winter,  the  Rev.  W.  Hudson  Shaw 
has  delivered  for  Oxford,  courses  to  audiences 
almost  exclusively  composed  of  working  men,  of 
450  at  Hebden  Bridge,  600  at  Oldham,  500  at 

1  Cambridge  Extension  Reports,  1886-90. 

2  Oxford  Extension  Reports,  1886-90. 

3  London  Extension  Eeport,  1889. 


38  UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS    IT   IS. 

Todmorden,  260  at  Ancoats,  Manchester,  and  500 
at  Sowerby  Bridge 1.  There  is  a  special  point  in 
connection  with  two  of  these  centres.  Oldham 
and  Todmorden  are  managed  exclusively  by  work- 
ing men  through  Co-operative  Societies2,  and  all 
financial  difficulties  are  got  over  by  taking  ad- 
vantage of  the  sums  which  such  Societies  are  per- 
mitted by  Act  of  Parliament  to  devote  to  education. 
The  same  was  true  of  Barnsley,  but  the  work  there 
has  been  suspended.  When  we  consider  that  each 
of  the  Societies  counts  many  thousands  of  mem- 
bers, we  shall  realise  that  these  fine  audiences  are 
after  all,  but  a  small  percentage  of  the  numbers 
that  contribute  to  the  cost  of  the  lectures. 

In  London  great  success  has  attended  the  de- 
livery of  short  courses  of  People's  Lectures  3. 

Similar  facts  could  be  stated  with  reference  to 
a  few  Cambridge  centres,  especially  in  the  North  4. 

One  very  important  class  remains  to  be  spoken 
of,  the  elementary  school  teachers.  They  have 
availed  themselves  very  largely  of  the  system. 
Since  much  of  the  effects  filter  through  them  to  the 
next  generation,  their  attendance  is  generally  felt  to 
be  of  the  utmost  importance,  and  it  has  become  a 
frequent  practice  to  allow  them  tickets  at  reduced 
prices.  At  a  course  delivered  by  one  of  the  writers 
at  Manchester,  some  two  or  three  years  ago,  out  of 

1  Oxford  Report,  1889-90. 

2  Oxford  Report,  1890. 

3  London  Report,  1889. 

4  Cf.  Dr.  Roberts'  Report  to  Cambridge  Syndicate,  1890. 


UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS    IT   IS.  39 

a  total  average  attendance  of  400,  no  fewer  than 
105  were  elementary  teachers. 

We  have  spoken  of  various  classes  attending  the 
lectures,  let  us  hasten  therefore  to  add  that  audi- 
ences wholly  of  one  class  are  rare.  One  of  the 
most  conspicuous  and  gratifying  characteristics  of 
Extension  work  is  the  way  in  which  it  brings  to- 
gether students  of  very  different  ranks.  '  In  an 
examination  recently  held  at  a  lecture- centre, 
among  those  who  were  awarded  certificates  of 
distinction  were  a  national  school-mistress,  a  young 
lawyer,  a  plumber,  and  a  railway-signalman  V 

LONG  AND  SHORT  COURSES. 

The  last  point  to  which  we  shall  refer  in  our 
survey  of  University  Extension,  is  a  matter  which 
has  given  rise  to  some  controversy.  It  will  be 
dealt  with  more  completely  when  we  speak  of  the 
history  of  the  movement.  We  mention  it  here 
because  it  still  forms  the  greatest  distinction  be- 
tween the  methods  of  the  different  branches  of 
University  Extension.  Under  the  heading  £  Sta- 
tistics,' we  drew  attention  to  the  shortness  of  the 
Oxford  courses  as  compared  with  those  of  London 
and  Cambridge.  With  Oxford,  the  normal  course 
consists  of  six  lectures,  with  Cambridge  and 
London  of  twelve.  It  is  the  exception  for  the 
Oxford  courses  to  be  longer  than  this,  and  for  the 

1  Oxford  Keport,  1889-90. 


40  UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS    IT   IS. 

Cambridge  and  London  courses  to  be  shorter1.  Cam- 
bridge and  London  refuse  to  give  '  certificates '  for  ex- 
aminations on  courses  of  less  than  eleven  or  twelve 
lectures,  Oxford  has  until  this  year  given  them  on 
courses  of  not  less  than  six 2.  It  was  felt  by  some 
of  those  who  were  chiefly  interested  in  the  Cam- 
bridge and  London  work  that  the  Oxford  policy 
was  dangerous.  It  might  depreciate  the  value  of 
the  certificate,  which  had  hitherto  been  associated 
with  the  idea  of  the  full  course  of  twelve  lectures. 
Some  centres  might  be  led  to  save  themselves  the 
trouble  of  collecting  the  necessary  funds  for  twelve 
lectures,  if  they  were  given  the  opportunity  of 
taking  only  six  instead. 

The  contention  of  Oxford,  on  the  other  hand,  was 
that  a  very  large  number  of  small  towns,  and  the 
poorer  districts  of  many  large  ones,  were  prevented 
from  adopting  University  Extension  by  the  con- 
siderable expense  involved  in  a  course  of  twelve 
lectures  ;  that  working-men's  societies,  especially, 
felt  the  outlay  required  for  twelve  lectures  beyond 
the  means  at  their  disposal.  It  was  pointed  out 
that  it  was  particularly  desirable  that  University 
Extension  should  spread  exactly  in  those  places 
and  among  those  classes  to  which  experience  had 
shewn  the  cost  of  twelve  lectures  to  be  often  pro- 
hibitive. There  were  also  a  number  of  towns  in 


1  Oxford  and  Cambridge  Reports  for  1889-90;   London  Report 
for  1889. 

2  Cf.  Oxford,  Cambridge  and  London  Regulations. 


UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS    IT    IS.  41 

which  University  Extension  teaching  had  been 
suspended.  In  some  of  these  its  original  promoters 
had  suffered  from  a  deficit.  It  was  extremely 
desirable  to  get  these  towns  to  try  again.  £  Only 
let  these  small  towns  and  poorer  districts  begin  on 
a  modest  scale/  it  was  argued,  '  and  you  will  find 
them  ready  to  venture  on  the  work  or  to  renew 
their  connection  with  it.  The  local  committees 
consist  of  men  and  women  who  are  sincerely  inter- 
ested in  education ;  you  may  trust  them  not  to  rest 
content  with  an  incomplete  course  as  soon  as  they 
can  afford  a  complete  one.  Financial  reasons,  not 
want  of  educational  interest,  hold  them  back. 
Many  of  them,  too,  are  not  well  off  and  are  unable 
to  afford  the  risk  of  a  heavy  outlay.  Above  all, 
they  may  be  trusted  not  to  deal  with  the  two 
Universities  as  between  rival  shopkeepers.  They 
are  loyal  to  the  University  with  which  they  have 
been  so  long  connected.  While  they  would  no 
doubt  gladly  avail  themselves  of  freedom  to  employ 
indifferently  Oxford  and  Cambridge  lecturers,  no 
local  committee  would,  in  a  spirit  of  mere  com- 
mercial competition,  transfer  its  allegiance  to  the 
cheapest  market.5 

To  this  it  was  subsequently  replied  that  there 
was  no  harm  in  offering  six  lectures  to  towns 
which  could  not  afford  twelve.  But  that  if  a  town 
took  only  half  a  course,  it  should  be  debarred  from 
having  an  examination  on  it.  The  full  privileges 
should  be  reserved  for  those  who  availed  them- 


42  UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS    IT   IS. 

selves  of  the  full  system.  If  a  town  could  have  an 
examination  and  certificates  on  six  lectures,  there 
would  be  no  incentive  for  it  to  make  a  further 
effort  to  have  twelve, 

Those  who  believed  in  the  Oxford  system  still 
held  their  ground.  The  object  of  University  Ex- 
tension, they  pointed  out,  was  to  provide  systematic 
teaching  for  adults.  Unless  the  students  attending 
the  lectures  were  encouraged  to  look  forward  to 
an  examination  at  the  end  of  the  course,  their 
attendance  might  become  irregular ;  they  might 
become  slack  in  writing  weekly  exercises ;  the 
quality  of  their  work  might  deteriorate.  Besides,  it 
was  expedient  to  show  those  towns  which  could 
not  arrange  the  full  course  of  twelve  lectures,  what 
the  University  Extension  method  really  was.  This 
would  not  be  done  by  merely  showing  them  part 
of  it.  It  was  necessary  to  maintain  the  com- 
plete educational  system  of  University  Extension 
wherever  it  was  established. 

Such  were  the  two  sides  of  the  question  in 
debate.  Happily  the  controversy  is  now  at  an  end. 
It  has  been  found  that  by  the  short  course  system 
a  large  number  of  new  centres  have  been  founded, 
but  that  this  increase  in  the  Oxford  work  has  not 
been  made  at  the  expense  of  either  the  Cambridge 
or  London  systems,  both  of  which  have  also  con- 
tinued to  grow.  First,  by  the  arrangement  of 
courses  at  fortnightly  instead  of  weekly  intervals  ; 
next,  as  their  means  permitted,  by  the  increase  in 


UNIVERSITY    EXTENSION    AS    IT    IS.  43 

the  number  of  lectures,  the  Oxford  centres  have 
steadily  lengthened  the  period  of  study  covered  by 
the  course1.  And  in  the  present  year  (1890)  a 
modification  has  been  made  in  the  Oxford  regula- 
tions which  has  met  with  the  approval  of  all 
parties  2.  The  Oxford  certificate  will  in  future  be 
awarded  only  after  courses  of  twelve  lectures :  ex- 
amination will  be  permitted,  as  before,  on  all 
courses  of  six  lectures  and  upwards :  but  students 
who  are  successful  in  examination  on  the  shorter 
courses  will  receive,  in  lieu  of  a  certificate,  a  printed 
statement  of  the  examiner's  award. 


THE  MERITS  AND  DEMERITS  OF  EXTENSION 
AS  IT  is. 

We  have  now  completed  our  sketch  of  University 
Extension  as  it  is.  We  claim  that  it  contains  all 
the  elements  required  in  a  great  teaching  system, 
the  personal  touch  with  the  leading  mind,  the  read- 
ing of  selected  books,  the  writing  of  essays  and 
their  criticism,  the  discussion  in  the  class  and  in 
the  Students'  Association,  the  test  of  the  examina- 
tion. It  includes  even  the  nucleus  of  a  system  of 
residence  in  the  midst  of  academic  surroundings. 
It  does  all  this  at  a  very  small  cost.  The  weak 
points  in  the  scheme  are  the  lack  of  sequence  in 

1  Oxford  Report,  1889-90. 

2  Oxford  Official  Circular  for  University  Extension,  1890. 


44  UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION   AS    IT    IS. 

the  subjects  of  the  courses  ;  the  fact  that,  com- 
paratively speaking,  so  few  young  men  attend  the 
lectures  ;  and,  above  all,  the  small  degree  to  which 
the  system  has  been  made  available  f  r  the  working 
classes,  despite  the  fact  that  under  occasionally 
fortunate  circumstances  they  have  shown  that  they 
might  be  its  most  enthusiastic  supporters.  All 
three  weak  points  are  ultimately  due  to  the  diffi- 
culties of  men  and  of  money.  These  will  be  con- 
sidered presently.  With  money  the  courses  might 
succeed  one  another  in  regular  educational  sequence. 
If  the  courses  were  in  sequence,  and  if  the  lecturers 
could  be  retained  through  their  prime,  when  they 
had  gathered  experience  and  power  of  speech,  the 
young  men  would  be  attracted.  With  such  lec- 
turers, and  with  money  to  c  eapen  the  courses,  the 
working  classes  would  be  reached. 


CHAPTER  II. 

UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION:    HOW   IT   HAS 
COME   TO   BE. 


SUCH,  then,  is  the  present  scope  of  University 
Extension.  Our  next  step  is  to  trace  the  gradual 
growth  of  the  idea,  and  the  stages  by  which,  from 
being  little  more  than  a  pious  opinion  cherished 
by  a  few  individuals,  it  has  become  an  organized 
system  in  almost  every  part  of  the  country. 


ORIGIN  or  THE  PHRASE  'UNIVERSITY 
EXTENSION/ 

The  phrase  '  University  Extension  '  seems  to 
have  first  become  current  in  the  discussions  on 
University  reform  which  were  prevalent  in  Oxford 
during  the  years  immediately  preceding  1850.  A 
great  number  of  influential  members  of  the  Univer- 
sity had  become  deeply  impressed  with  the  import- 
ance of  extending  the  benefits  of  University  educa- 
tion to  classes  of  students  who  were  then  excluded 
from  the  University  by  its  regulations  or  arrange- 
ments. So  long  ago  as»  1  845  a  number  of  noblemen 


46  HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME    TO    BE. 

and  gentlemen,  both  of  the  clergy  and  laity,  pre- 
sented to  the  Hebdomadal  Board  of  the  University 
of  Oxford  an  address  which  prayed  the  Board  to 
adopt  measures  for  the  admission  of  a  poorer  class 
to  the  University1.  Among  the  signatures  ap- 
pended to  that  address  were  those  of  Lord  Sandon, 
Lord  Ashley,  Mr.  Gladstone,  and  others  of  high 
distinction.  The  petitioners  did  not  content  them- 
selves with  merely  asking  the  University  to  adopt 
their  suggestions,  but  offered  to  give  pecuniary 
assistance  to  the  scheme.  They  sought,  in  the 
words  subsequently  used  by  Dr.  Pusey 2,  '  to  enable 
the  University  to  extend  its  benefits  to  talented 
and  well-conditioned  young  men,  however  born, 
provided  they  shall  be  prepared  to  benefit  by  its 
education/  c  I  was  much  struck,'  added  Dr.  Pusey, 
who  supported  the  general  purpose  of  this  proposal, 
'  in  looking  over  the  Biographia  Britannica  for  the 
history  of  our  Divines,  to  observe  how  many  of 
them  were  the  sons  of  tradesmen.'  He  also  sought 
to  confirm  the  new  scheme  by  an  appeal  to  ancient 
precedent :  '  In  older  times,'  he  pointed  out,  '  the 
monks  of  Durham  used  systematically  to  send 
talented  boys  to  be  educated  at  the  University.' 
'  The  University,'  said  Professor  Hussey 3,  '  seems 
bound  to  do  something  to  meet  the  wants  of  the 

1  Report  of  Oxford  University  Commission,  1852,  p.  35. 

2  Report    and    Evidence    upon    the    recommendations    of    Her 
Majesty's   Commissioners,   presented   to  the   Board   of  Heads   of 
Houses  and  Proctors,  Dec.  i,  1853.     Oxford,  1853,  p.  79. 

3  Ibid.  pp.  233,  234.  * 


HOW   EXTENSION    HAS    COME    TO    BE.  47 

increasing  numbers  of  the  population;  and  especially 
to  make  more  opening  for  those  for  whom  a  great 
part  of  its  advantages  were  always  intended,  the 
youth  of  promise  who  have  not  at  present  the  means 
of  obtaining  University  education  for  themselves  ; 
not  because  they  are  poor  merely,  as  objects  of  pity, 
nor  yet  as  a  different  order,  to  be  distinguished  by 
badges,  but  because  they  show  talent  and  industry 
and  willingness,  and  desire  to  improve  themselves, 
and  because  they  ought  not  to  be  shut  out  from 
advantages  open  to  other  persons,  with  whom  they 
might  perhaps  compete  successfully.'  The  object 
of  this  important  movement  was  well  summed  up 
by  Mr.  Osborne  Gordon x,  of  Christ  Church,  who  said, 
'  I  look  for  the  extension  of  the  University  to  the 
poor.' 

There  was  indeed  much  in  the  condition  of  the 
University  of  Oxford  which  called  for  change.  The 
expenses  of  collegiate  life,  especially  when  compared 
with  the  standard  of  that  time,  were  great,  while 
the  subscription  to  the  Thirty-nine  Articles  required 
at  matriculation,  and  the  subscription  to  the  three 
Articles  of  the  36th  Canon  on  presentation  for  a 
degree,  excluded  one  class  of  the  community  from 
University  education.  As  to  the  propriety  of  making 
any  alteration  in  the  religious  tests,  there  was  of 
course  grave  difference  of  opinion  both  in  the  Uni- 
versity and  outside  it ;  but  men  of  all  parties  seem 

1  Report  and  Evidence  upon  the  recommendations  of  Her 
Majesty's  Commissioners,  p.  198. 


48  HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME    TO    BE. 

to  have  felt  the  importance  of  facilitating  the 
admission  of  a  poorer  class  of  students  to  the 
privileges  of  University  life.  The  strength  and 
prevalence  of  this  feeling  is  proved  by  the  evidence 
given  before  the  Oxford  University  Commission  of 
1850.  '  I  believe/  said  Mr.  Arthur  Clough  \  in  the 
considerations  which  he  submitted  to  that  Com- 
mission, '  I  believe  in  the  possibility  of  a  gradual, 
sure,  and  ultimately  large  extension  of  the  old 
Universities.'  '  The  ideal  of  a  national  University/ 
Mr.  Mark  Pattison  2  argued  before  the  same  body, 
1  is  that  it  should  be  co-extensive  with  the  nation ; 
it  should  be  the  common  source  of  the  whole  of  the 
higher  (or  secondary)  instruction  for  the  country.' 
'  The  University/  he  continued,  quoting  from  Gordon, 
'  should  strike  its  roots  freely  into  the  subsoil  of 
society,  and  draw  from  it  new  elements  of  life  and 
sustenance  of  mental  and  moral  power/ 

THE  SEVEN  SCHEMES  FOE  UNIVERSITY 
EXTENSION  IN  1850. 

It  appears  that  this  widely-felt  desire  to  extend 
the  usefulness  of  the  University  had  led  to  the 
proposal  of  several  schemes  which,  as  was  believed 
by  their  advocates,  would  separately  or  conjointly 
accomplish  the  design  which  so  many  influential 

1-Dxford  University  Commission,  1853.     Evidence,  p.  213. 
2  Ibid.,  Evidence,  p.  44. 


HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME    TO   BE.  49 

graduates  had  at  heart.  These  c  plans  for  University 
Extension '  were  accordingly  summarised  by  the 
Commissioners,  who  thus  gave  their  official  stamp 
to  an  expression,  which  had  been  found  to  conve- 
niently designate  the  movement  for  the  spread  of 
University  effort  into  new  and  wider  fields  of 
national  life.  Seven  schemes  of  University  Exten- 
sion were  mentioned  by  the  Commissioners  *,  and 
four  of  these  were  discussed  in  detail.  The  plans 
were  as  follows : — 

i.  The  establishment  in  the  University  of  new 
Halls,  as  independent  Societies  or  in  connexion 
with  Colleges. 

2,.  Permission  to  Undergraduates  to  lodge  in 
private  houses  more  generally  than  at  present. 

3.  Permission  to  Students  to  become  Members  of 
the  University,  and  to  be  educated  at  Oxford  under 
due  superintendence,  without  subjecting  them  to 
the  expenses  incident  to  connexion  with  a  College 
or  Hall. 

4.  Admission  of  persons  to  Professorial  Lectures, 
to  whom  the  Professors  should  be  authorised  to 
grant  certificates  of  attendance,  without  any  further 
connexion  with  the  University. 

5.  The  abolition  of  religious  tests  on  matricula- 
tion and  graduation. 

6.  The    foundation    of    Theological    Schools    in 
Cathedral-cities,  and  their  affiliation  to  the  Univer- 
sity.    The  affiliation  to  the  University  of  Lampeter 

1  Oxford  University  Commission,  1853.     Keport,  pp.  35-56. 
E 


50  HOW    EXTENSION    HAS    COME    TO    BE. 

College  and  of  the  Theological  College  at  Birken- 
head. 

7.  The  provision  of  funds  by  the  University  for 
the  establishment  of  professorial  chairs  in  Bir- 
mingham and  Manchester  ;  sufficient  attendance  at 
the  lectures  of  these  Professors  to  be  accepted  as 
qualifying  for  a  degree. 

The  Commissioners  did  not  consider  that  the 
examination  of  all  these  schemes  fell  within  the 
scope  of  their  enquiry.  Indeed,  the  fifth  proposal, 
involving  the  admission  of  Nonconformists  to  the 
University,  implied  a  question  which  they  were  in- 
structed not  to  entertain.  On  this  head,  therefore, 
they  contented  themselves  with  expressing  their 
'  conviction  that  the  imposition  of  subscription  in 
the  manner  in  which  it  (was  then)  imposed  in  the 
University  of  Oxford,  habituates  the  mind  to  give 
a  careless  assent  to  truths  which  it  has  never  con- 
sidered, and  naturally  leads  to  sophistry  in  the 
interpretation  of  solemn  obligations.' 

The  fourth  proposal,  namely,  that  for  the  admis- 
sion to  Professorial  Lectures  of  persons  who  were 
not  matriculated  members  of  the  University,  was 
found  to  have  been  already  anticipated  by  common 
practice. 

The  Commissioners  approved  of  the  first  three 
plans  for  University  Extension,  and,  as  is  well 
known,  residence  in  Oxford,  but  outside  the  walls 
of  his  College,  has  since  become  the  almost  inva- 
riable experience  of  every  undergraduate,  during 


HOW    EXTENSION   HAS    COME    TO   BE.          51 

part  of  his  academical  career,  while  the  body  of 
Non-collegiate  students,  residing  in  Oxford  without 
being  attached  to  any  College  or  Hall,  has  become 
an  important  part  of  the  University. 

These  schemes,  however,  were  rather  of  a 
domestic  nature.  They  have  affected  the  internal 
life  of  the  University,  and  have  increased  for  large 
numbers  and  many  new  classes  of  students,  the 
convenience  of  its  arrangements.  But  it  is  rather 
to  the  remaining  proposals  for  the  affiliation  of 
local  Colleges  and  for  the  establishment  of  teaching 
in  large  towns,  that  we  turn  for  the  origin  of  the 
movement,  which  is  now  specifically  called  Univer- 
sity Extension.  The  University  has  now  for  a  long 
time  adopted  the  principle  of  affiliating  to  itself,  on 
certain  conditions,  educational  institutions  out  of 
Oxford,  while  the  University  of  Cambridge  has 
taken  the  further  step  of  offering  the  advantages  of 
affiliation  to  a  number  of  towns  which,  while  not 
possessing  any  collegiate  buildings,  are  yet  support- 
ing a  comprehensive  and  systematic  scheme  of 
education. 

THE  FIRST  PROPOSAL  TOR  UNIVERSITY 
EXTENSION  TEACHING,  1850. 

The  germ,  however,  of  University  Extension,  as 
we  now  understand  it,  is  to  be  found  in  the  idea 
that  it  would  be  right  and  politic  for  the  University 
to  provide  funds  for  the  maintenance  of  Professors 


52  HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME   TO    BE. 

in  Birmingham  and  Manchester1.  This  proposal 
was  made  by  Mr.  Sewell,  Fellow  and  Senior  Tutor 
of  Exeter  College,  in  a  letter  addressed  to  the  Vice- 
Chancellor  of  Oxford,  in  the  year  1 850,  and  entitled, 
£  Suggestions  on  University  Extension/  It  is  in- 
teresting to  conjecture  what  results  might  have 
flowed  from  the  early  adoption  of  this  idea.  The 
judgment,  however,  of  the  Commissioners  was  ad- 
verse to  it.  '  If/  they  wrote,  '  the  means  of  the 
University  were  unbounded,  its  superfluities  might 
possibly  be  employed  on  the  general  purposes  of 
education  throughout  the  country;  but  such  a 
scheme  should  not  be  entertained  till  it  has  shown 
that  there  is  no  demand  for  men  and  for  money  in 
the  University  itself.'  It  is  to  be  regretted  that 
the  Commissioners  did  not  realise  the  importance 
and  suggestiveness  of  Mr.  Se well's  proposal,  and 
failed  to  perceive  that  hardly  any  more  useful  task 
was  then  imposed  on  the  University  than  to  co- 
operate with  the  munificent  and  earnest  friends  of 
higher  education  resident  in  the  large  towns,  in  the 
gradual  provision  of  opportunities  for  higher  educa- 
tion in  those  great  industrial  centres.  It  is  fortunate 
that,  at  a  later  time,  both  the  old  Universities  have 
found  it  compatible  with  the  proper  care  and 
encouragement  of  the  studies  within  their  own 
walls,  to  expend  a  portion  of  their  revenues  in 
stimulating  the  love  of  learning  among  those  whom 
home  ties  or  business  duties  absolutely  prevent 
1  See  p.  50. 


HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME    TO    BE.  53 

from  undertaking  any  prolonged  period  of  residence 
within  the  Universities  themselves. 

Such,  then,  was  the  first  publication  to  the 
country  of  the  idea  of  University  Extension.  It  is 
singular  that  among  all  the  various  schemes  not 
one,  even  remotely,  entertains  the  project  of  pro- 
viding in  the  University  the  means  of  higher 
education  for  women.  But,  with  this  one  excep- 
tion, the  proposals  for  University  Extension  put 
forward  in  Oxford  at  the  time  of  the  first  Univer- 
sity Commission  anticipated  the  various  sides  of 
the  movement,  which  ever  since  has  gone  on 
steadily  gaining  ground.  It  is  probable  that,  in 
Cambridge  also,  the  subject  received  considerable 
attention,  but  the  great  prominence  given  to  its 
discussion  in  the  report  of  the  University  Com- 
mission, shows  that  it  was  particularly  in  Oxford, 
that  public  opinion  was  first  deeply  moved  by  the 
necessity  of  adjusting  the  regulations  and  require- 
ments of  the  University  to  the  needs  of  large  and 
deserving  classes  who  had  been  excluded  from  it. 

One  circumstance  alone  would,  however,  have 
caused  any  elaborate  scheme  for  the  extension  of 
University  teaching  in  large  towns  to  have  been 
then  justly  regarded  as  premature.  The  University 
Extension  system,  as  we  now  understand  it,  de- 
pends on  our  railway  system.  It  would  be  im- 
possible for  it  to  work  without  our  modern  service 
of  quick  and  frequent  trains.  Any  one  who  com- 
pares the  Bradshaw  of  to-day  with  the  Bradshaw 


54  HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME    TO   BE. 

of  1850  will  see  at  once  one  sufficient  reason 
why  the  idea  of  University  Extension  teaching 
did  not  strike  root  when  Mr.  Se well's  proposal 
appeared.  In  his  pamphlet  on  University  Exten- 
sion l,  Dr.  Eoberts  points  out  that  the  University 
Extension  movement  of  to-day  is  fulfilling  one  of 
the  pious  hopes  of  the  founder  of  Glare  College,  who 
desired  to  see  an  increase  in  the  number  of  stu- 
dents, c  to  the  end  that  the  precious  pearl  of  know- 
ledge, having  been  found  by  them,  and  made  their 
own  by  study  and  instruction  in  the  University, 
might  not  be  hidden  under  a  bushel,  but  be  spread 
abroad  beyond  the  University,  and  give  light  to 
them  that  walk  in  the  dark  paths  of  ignorance.' 
Under  changed  conditions,  University  Extension 
is  thus  realising  some  of  the  ideals  of  the  past. 
But  the  present  scheme  is  not  so  much  to  bring 
to  the  Universities  the  modern  representatives  of 
those  great  multitudes  who  in  old  days  flocked 
to  it.  Its  aim  is  rather  to  take  some  of  the  oppor- 
tunities of  University  education  to  them,  in  the 
belief  that,  by  adjusting  their  arrangements  to  the 
various  needs  of  the  different  classes  of  the  com- 
munity, the  Universities,  without  losing  any  part 
of  their  present  dignity  and  usefulness,  will  more 
and  more  conform  to  the  ideal  of  truly  national 
institutions. 

1  '  The  University  Extension  Scheme  as  the  basis  of  a  system  for 
National  Higher  Education,'  by  R.  D.  Roberts,  M.A.,  D.  Sc.  (Lond.) 
Aberystwyth,  1887. 


HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME    TO   BE          ,  55 

SIR  THOMAS  ACLAND  AND  THE  BEGINNING  or 
THE  LOCAL  EXAMINATIONS. 

Hardly  had  the  University  Commission  of  1850 
concluded  its  labours,  than  a  step  was  taken  by  an 
association  in  London  which  had  indirectly  an  im- 
portant effect  on  the  development  of  University 
Extension.  The  Society  of  Arts  established  in 
1854  a  series  of  examinations  for  Mechanics'  In- 
stitutes. In  1852  the  Society  had  taken  the  lead 
in  forming  a  union  of  Mechanics'  Institutes,  to 
which  more  than  300  of  them  became  affiliated. 
Two  years  later  the  Society  arranged  to  hold  ex- 
aminations for  the  members  of  these  Institutes, 
and  to  offer  certificates  of  competency  to  those 
who  acquitted  themselves  in  the  examination  with 
credit.  These  examinations,  in  which  the  present 
Bishop  of  London  acted  as  one  of  the  examiners, 
proved  completely  successful;  and  were  designed 
specially  with  a  view  to  stimulating  the  studies 
and  testing  the  knowledge  of  adults. 

But,  important  as  was  the  work  among  adults, 
it  was  soon  felt  that  there  was  an  even  greater  need 
for  similar  examinations  designed  for  boys  at  school. 
'  The  education  of  the  middle  classes,'  Dr.  Temple 
wrote  to  the  Master  of  Pembroke  College,  Oxford, 
in  April  1857,  '  suffers  from  the  want  of  any  definite 
aim  to  guide  the  work  of  the  schoolmasters  and 
from  the  want  of  any  trustworthy  test  to  distinguish 


56          HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME    TO   BE. 

between  good  and  bad  schools.'  Lord  Ebrington 
accordingly,  had  called  attention  in  1855  to  the 
examination  designed  by  the  Society  of  Arts  for 
the  adult  members  of  Mechanics'  Institutes,  and 
in  conjunction  with  Mr.  (now  Sir  Thomas)  Acland 
and  the  Rev.  J.  L.  Brereton,  promulgated  a  scheme 
for  the  examination  of  middle- class  schools  in  the 
West  of  England.  The  further  development  of  the 
idea  is  described  in  a  book  subsequently  published 
by  Mr.  Acland l.  It  appears  from  his  account  that 
the  operations  of  the  Bath  and  West  of  England 
Society  for  the  encouragement  of  Agriculture,  Arts, 
Manufactures,  and  Commerce,  brought  together  a 
number  of  persons  engaged  in  different  occupations, 
but  with  a  common  object  in  view.  Among  these 
persons  '  a  thirst  for  knowledge  was  excited  and  a 
consequent  sense  of  the  evils  of  neglected  education 
awakened.  Accordingly,  a  few  persons  of  various 
shades  of  opinion,  political  and  religious,  having 
learned  to  act  together  and  to  trust  each  other, 
provided  a  small  prize  fund  with  a  view  to  put  to 
a  practical  test  the  value  which  the  middle  ranks 
might  be  disposed  to  attach  to  certificates  of  the 
progress  of  their  children,  if  awarded  by  competent 
examiners  2.'  This  Committee,  to  which  Mr.  Acland 
acted  as  Secretary,  was  formed  at  Exeter  in  the 

J  Some  Account  of  the  Origin  and  Objects  of  the  New  Oxford 
Examinations  for  the  title  of  Associate  in  Arts  and  Certificates,  for 
the  Year  1858.  By  T.  D.  Acland.  London,  1858. 

2  Ibid.  pp.  96,  97. 


HOW    EXTENSION    HAS  COME   TO    BE.  57 

early  part  of  1857,  and  met  with  substantial  en- 
couragement from  the  Bath  and  West  of  England 
Society  later  in  the  same  year.  The  machinery 
devised  by  Mr.  Acland  consisted  of  a  Local  Examina- 
tion Committee,  consisting  of  thoroughly  representa- 
tive persons  resident  in  the  locality,  and  of  a  Board 
of  Examiners,  in  which  it  is  interesting  to  note  the 
names  of  Sir  Stafford  Northcote,  Professor  Max  Miiller, 
Mr.  George  Richmond,  Mr.  John  Hullah,  and  Dr. 
(now  Sir  Henry)  Acland.  But  the  Local  Committee, 
in  order  to  give  to  their  work  as  much  of  an  official 
stamp  as  was  possible  under  the  circumstances, 
asked  the  Committee  of  Council  on  Education  to 
allow  two  of  Her  Majesty's  Inspectors  of  Schools 
to  co-operate  with  the  examiners  locally  appointed. 
The  request  was  granted,  and  the  Lord  President 
instructed  the  Rev.  F.  Temple  (now  Bishop  of 
London)  and  Mr.  J.  Bowstead  '  to  afford  assistance 
in  giving  effect  to  the  scheme  of  examination  and 
prizes.' 

The  examination,  which  took  place  in  June  1857, 
was  regarded  by  Mr.  Temple  as  'the  first  step 
towards  the  improvement  of  middle- class  educa- 
tion V  and  similar  examinations  were  organized  in 
the  counties  of  Staffordshire,  Cheshire,  Shropshire, 
Warwickshire,  and  in  South  Wales.  It  was  clear 
that  there  was  beginning  a  general  and  spontaneous 
movement  for  the  improvement  of  middle-class 
education,  and  that  'the  intellectual  life  of  the 

1  Ibid.  p.  192,  Mr.  Temple's  Report. 


58          HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME    TO  BE. 

people  was  pushing  forth  vigorous  shoots  in  various 
directions  V 

The  details  of  this  local  effort  are  historically  in- 
teresting because  they  gave  the  stimulus  to  the 
next  step  in  University  Extension.  Mr.  Acland's 
original  scheme  was  avowedly  experimental.  If  it 
succeeded,  it  was  his  hope  that  it  would  be  followed 
up  by  some  recognised  authority,  his  own  desire 
being  that  the  Universities  should  themselves 
organize  and  superintend  similar  local  examinations 
in  different  parts  of  the  country.  He  pointed  out 
c  that  the  religious  exclusiveness  of  the  Universities 
had  been  removed  by  Act  of  Parliament ;  .  .  .  that, 
as  regards  secular  knowledge,  they  were  in  a  favour- 
able position  for  combining  much  freedom  with 
much  exactness  .  .  .  that,  in  the  department  of  the 
Arts,  they  had  great  advantages  in  their  libraries 
and  collections  .  .  .  and  that  many  of  their  members 
possessed  experience  of  the  official  work  of  public 
education  going  on  in  the  country2.'  It  was  also 
pointed  out  that  the  many  graduates  of  the  Univer- 
sities who  occupied  important  posts  in  the  large 
towns,  and  were  connected  with  the  administration 
of  justice  and  the  management  of  public  institutions 
in  country  districts,  formed  a  natural  body  of  sup- 
porters for  the  new  scheme,  the  success  of  which 
would  depend  on  the  cordial  co-operation  between 

1  Some  Account  of  the  Origin  and  Objects   of  the  New  Oxford 
Examinations  for  the  Title  of  Associate  in  Arts,  p.  98. 

2  Ibid.  p.  10. 


HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME   TO    BE.  59 

the  local  committee  and  the  central  authorities  in 
the  Universities.  The  great  position  of  the  Univer- 
sities would  '  be  a  strong  security  that  no  private 
crotchets  or  personal  interests  would  be  allowed  to 
disturb  the  action  of  a  great  body  of  men  for  the 
mental  cultivation  of  a  free  people  V 

'  A  career  of  almost  unbounded  usefulness/  wrote 
Mr.  Acland  in  1858,  'seems  open  to  the  Universities 
if  they  will  respond  to  the  call  of  the  nation  for 
aid  in  supplying  a  better  general  education  to  the 
great  body  of  their  countrymen.  Their  fortunate 
position  within  reach  of,  but  not  within,  the 
metropolis,  their  traditional  associations,  their  com- 
parative independence  of  pecuniary  interest,  their 
connection  with  so  many  parishes  and  grammar- 
schools,  all  seem  to  point  them  out  as  eminently 
qualified  to  give  a  healthy  and  liberal  tone  to 
school  education  as  a  preparation  for  the  busy  oc- 
cupations of  agricultural  and  commercial  life,  no 
less  than  for  literary  and  scientific  pursuits  V 

Such  was  the  new  proposal  which  was  put  before 
the  Universities.  They  were  asked  to  extend  their 
usefulness  by  taking  for  the  first  time  a  definite 
part  in  the  education  of  persons  who  had  not  been 
matriculated.  Memorials  supporting  the  request 
poured  in  from  different  parts  of  the  country. 
Interest  was  aroused  first  in  Oxford,  immediately 

1  Some  Account  of  the  Origin  and  Objects  of  the  New  Oxford 
Examinations  for  the  Title  of  Associate  in  Arts,  p.  II. 

2  Ibid.  pp.  98,  99. 


60  HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME    TO   BE. 

afterwards  in  Cambridge  ;  and  with  little  delay  the 
system  of  local  examinations  '  of  those  who  were 
not  members  of  the  University '  was  adopted  by 
both  the  old  Universities.  '  To  borrow  a  happy 
illustration  from  the  originator  of  the  "  Oxford 
Extension  Scheme/'3  wrote  Mr.  Acland  in  1858, 
'  Oxford  has  opened  a  locomotive  department,  and 
the  first  line  of  rails  was  laid  down  by  the  West 
of  England.' 

The  new  idea  was  now  firmly  established.  The 
Universities  had  recognised  their  lucational  duty 
towards  the  country  in  a  wider  sense  than  ever 
before.  And  the  promoters  of  the  new  scheme 
had  devised  and  tested  a  system  which  com- 
bined local  self-government  with  the  advantages 
of  central  supervision  and  management.  Local 
business  was  entrusted  to  the  voluntary  local  com- 
mittees ;  the  educational  policy  of  the  movement 
was  rightly  reserved  for  the  Universities  them- 
selves. 

Such  a  sensible  and  practical  arrangement  was 
sure  to  develope.  And,  detail  by  detail,  new 
branches  were  added  to  the  work.  Girls  were 
examined  as  well  as  boys  :  more  advanced  students 
as  well  as  children. 

It  soon  however  became  apparent  that  the 
system  was  capable  of  a  still  wider  extension. 
Teaching  was  required  as  well  as  examination. 
The  noble  generosity  of  wealthy  citizens  was  in 
many  great  towns  stimulating  the  work  of  higher 


HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME    TO    BE.  61 

education.  The  great  movement  for  the  foundation 
of  local  colleges,  a  movement  which  has  given 
England  a  new  University,  had  commenced.  All 
over  the  country  there  were  signs  of  a  freshly 
quickened  desire  for  knowledge  and  an  eagerness 
to  obtain  it  at  the  hands  of  the  best  teachers.  The 
higher  education  of  women  was  making  rapid 
advances.  And  the  c  sharp  struggle '  which  pre- 
ceded the  Education  Act  of  1870  had  already 
begun. 

09 

PROFESSOR  STUART  AND  THE  BEGINNING  OF 
LOCAL  LECTURES. 

The  next  step,  therefore,  was  to  make  the 
machinery  of  the  local  examinations  available  for 
the  purpose  of  local  lectures.  This  great  step  in 
University  Extension  was  due  to  the  energy  of 
Professor  Stuart. 

In  1 867,  he  received  an  invitation  from  an  asso- 
ciation of  ladies  in  the  north  of  England  to  give 
some  lectures  to  them1.  The  President  of  the 
Association  was  Mrs.  Josephine  Butler,  the  Secre- 
tary Miss  A.  J.  Clough.  He  was  asked  to  lecture 
on  the  art  of  teaching.  He  replied  that  he  had  not 

1  Inaugural  Address  of  Professor  Stuart  at  the  Second  Summer 
Meeting  of  University  Extension  Students  in  Oxford,  July  30, 1889. 
Report,  p.  20.  The  following  account  is  largely  based  on  that 
address. 


62  HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME    TO  BE. 

experience  enough  to  lecture  on  that  subject,  but, 
cas  a  thing  is  often  best  described  by  showing  a 
piece  of  it,3  he  offered  to  give  a  course  of  eight  lec- 
tures, in  which  he  would  endeavour  to  teach  some- 
thing. There  was  special  point  in  this  offer  of  a 
course  of  lectures  :  Professor  Stuart  had  been  'vexed 
with  the  insufficiency  of  the  single-lecture  system 
which  prevailed  in  connection  with  Mechanics' 
Institutes  and  Literary  Societies.'  He  was  con- 
vinced that  if  teaching  was  to  be  systematic,  it 
must  be  embodied  in  a  course.  Twenty  years  later 
Mr.  Barnett  remarked  that  University  Extension 
must  now  aim  at  substituting  for  the  casual  course 
of  lectures  (history  fortuitously  following  science, 
and  literature,  political  economy)  the  series  of 
courses  arranged  in  some  more  definite  sequence. 
The  first  battle,  however,  of  University  Extension, 
when  Professor  Stuart  took  up  the  cudgels,  was  to 
substitute  the  course  of  lectures  by  the  same  teacher 
for  a  disconnected  series  of  isolated  addresses  by 
separate  lecturers.  Nor  was  Professor  Stuart  alone 
in  his  contention.  Professor  Henry  Morley  and 
others  along  with  him,  succeeded  at  last  in 
getting  the  public  to  understand  that  it  is  much 
more  interesting  to  follow  one  man  well  through  a 
subject  than  to  listen  to  a  succession  of  men  com- 
plaining that  they  have  not  time  really  to  tackle  it. 
Professor  Stuart's  courses  were  given  in  1867  at 
Leeds,  Liverpool,  Manchester,  and  Sheffield.  They 
were  well  attended,  but  confined  to  women  only. 


HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME    TO    BE.  63 

Thus,  in  its  first  beginnings,  University  Extension 
was  set  on  foot  by  women.  And  ever  since  that 
time  women  have  formed  a  large  part  of  University 
Extension  audiences.  These  first  courses  of  Pro- 
fessor Stuart  were,  however,  interesting,  not  only 
because  they  were  practically  the  origin  of  Uni- 
versity Extension  teaching,  but  because  they  sug- 
gested two  arrangements  which  are  still  important 
features  in  the  system.  These  were  the  syllabus 
and  the  weekly  exercises.  The  syllabus  was  de- 
vised as  a  lesson  in  note-taking :  Professor  Stuart 
says  that  he  got  the  idea  from  Professor  Ferrier  of 
St.  Andrews,  '  who  used,  in  connexion  with  some 
of  his  more  difficult  lectures,  to  dictate  a  series  of 
heads  which  were  found  to  be  an  immense  assist- 
ance.' The  other  feature,  the  weekly  exercises, 
were  hit  upon  as  a  compromise  which  would  avoid 
the  necessity  of  orally  questioning  the  audience,  a 
chastening,  but  at  the  same  time  embarrassing,  ex- 
perience, which  the  lecturer  agreed  with  the  majority 
of  his  students  in  wishing  to  avoid.  The  first  course 
of  lectures  was  followed  by  many  others.  Several 
other  graduates  were  invited  to  lecture.  But  the 
arrangement  was  made  in  each  case  ad  hoc,  and 
a  difficulty  arose  from  the  fact  that  the  lecturers 
could  be  offered  nothing  approaching  to  permanent 
employment. 

How  then  was  the  affair  to  be  systematised  ? 
Professor  Stuart's  first  proposal  was  'to  form  a 
central  committee  permanently  engaging  lecturers 


64  HOW   EXTENSION    HAS    COME    TO   BE. 

at  a  salary,  and  sub-letting  them,  so  to  speak,  to 
local  associations.'  There  was  much  to  recommend 
this  plan :  even  now  there  is  much  to  be  said  in  its 
favour.  Had  it  been  adopted,  we  should  to-day 
have  been  working  University  Extension  as  an 
affair  of  business.  It  would  have  been  *  University 
Extension,  Limited.'  But  there  were  two  obstacles, 
one  which  was  temporary,  another  which  would 
always  have  been  fatal.  The  fatal  objection  is,  that 
no  company,  working  merely  on  business  methods, 
could  command  the  same  prestige  in  the  educational 
world  as  a  committee  appointed  by  and  representing 
the  Universities.  Such  a  company  might  conceiv- 
ably have  been  freer  to  make  experiments :  it 
would  almost  certainly  have  been  able  to  command 
larger  resources  of  capital  for  the  retention  of  ex- 
perienced or  promising  lecturers.  But  it  would 
not  have  enjoyed  the  same  status.  It  would  not 
have  had  at  its  back  the  same  wealth  of  associa- 
tions. Its  work  would  not  have  appealed  in  the 
same  way  to  the  affectionate  interest  of  the  old 
University  rnen  who,  scattered  as  they  are  in 
positions  of  influence  all  over  the  country,  form,  as 
Sir  Thomas  Acland  had  seen  years  before,  the 
natural  supporters  and  local  agents  of  such  part  of 
the  work  of  the  University  as  cannot  be  con- 
ducted in  the  University  town  itself.  In  the  case 
however  of  Professor  Stuart's  proposal,  when  it 
was  first  broached,  this  objection,  though  it  was 
doubtless  realised,  did  not  prove  the  immediately 


HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME    TO    BE.  65 

fatal  one.  The  fatal  difficulty  was  the  merely 
temporary  one  of  want  of  funds.  This  drawback 
would  soon  have  been  overcome,  but  at  the  time  it 
was  insuperable.  '  The  whole  proposal,'  said  Pro- 
fessor Stuart,  '  was,  I  suppose,  premature/ 

A  new  step,  however,  was  taken.  Lectures  for 
women  were  started  in  Cambridge  itself.  A  house 
was  soon  opened  for  their  reception.  And  thus 
arose  Newnham  College,  which,  together  with  Gir- 
ton  College,  established  for  the  first  time  a  per- 
manent institution  for  the  education  of  women  in 
the  University.  Then  quickly  followed,  from  the 
North  of  England  Council  for  the  Education  of 
Women,  a  new  request  for  a  committee  of  Univer- 
sity men  to  test  by  examination  the  attainments 
of  governesses.  This  led  to  the  establishment  at 
Cambridge  of  the  Higher  Local  Examinations. 

Thus  the  movement  steadily  consolidated  itself. 
It  had,  however,  already  taken  a  new  departure. 
One  of  the  junior  managers  at  the  Crewe  Eailway 
Works,  Mr.  Moorsom,  wrote  to  Professor  Stuart  in 
1867,  urging  him  to  come  and  give  a  lecture  to  the 
workmen  there.  The  invitation  was  accepted.  The 
subject  of  the  lecture  was  'Meteors,'  and  it  received 
a  gratuitous  advertisement  from  a  remarkable 
shower  of  meteors  which  fell  on  the  day  before. 
The  lecture  met  with  such  acceptance  that  it  led  to 
the  delivery  of  a  course  of  lectures  similar  to  those 
which  had  been  given  to  women.  The  course  at 
Crewe  was  followed  by  one  to  the  members  of  the 

F 


66  HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME    TO   BE. 

Equitable  Pioneers1  Society  at  Kochdale,  an  asso- 
ciation of  working  men  which  bears  an  honoured 
name  in  the  economic  history  of  England.  It  was 
at  Kochdale  that  Professor  Stuart  invented  'the 
class/  the  period  of  conversational  teaching,  often 
enlivened  by  brisk  episodes  of  e  heckling/  which  has 
ever  since  been  an  important  feature  in  the  Univer- 
sity Extension  System.  The  origin  of  the  class  was 
simple.  The  lectures  were  illustrated  by  diagrams. 
Professor  Stuart  wanted  the  diagrams  which  had 
illustrated  one  lecture  to  remain  on  the  walls  till 
his  next  appearance,  as  he  proposed  again  to  refer 
to  them.  The  hall-keeper  demurred  as,  in  the 
interval  between  the  lectures,  the  society  was  going 
to  meet  in  the  same  hall  for  the  discussion  of  business. 
However,  leave  was  at  last  obtained,  and  it  tran- 
spired that  the  members  who  attended  the  meeting 
were  so  attracted  by  the  diagrams  that  they  stayed 
behind  to  discuss  them  for  a  whole  hour.  They  had 
indeed  asked  the  door-keeper  to  invite  Professor 
Stuart  to  come  to  the  lecture-room  before  the  next 
lecture,  in  order  that  they  might  ask  him  some 
questions.  He  did  so,  and  thus  began  the  first 
University  Extension  '  class.' 

OFFICIAL  RECOGNITION  OF  EXTENSION  TEACHING 
BY  THE  UNIVERSITY  OF  CAMBRIDGE. 

The  rapid  growth,  however,  of  the  new  scheme 
brought  heavier  responsibility.     It  became  clear 


HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME    TO   BE.  67 

that  there  must  be  some  central  organization  for 
the  supply  of  competent  lecturers  from  the  Univer- 
sity. Now,  in  its  system  of  Local  Examinations, 
the  University  already  supplied  examiners.  Why 
not  lecturers  too?  It  had  the  men,  it  had  the 
machinery,  it  had  the  prestige.  Accordingly,  in 
November,  1871,  Professor  Stuart  addressed  a  letter 
on  the  subject  to  the  University  of  Cambridge1. 
He  submitted  to  the  University  what  was  in  effect 
the  same  proposal  as  that  made  to  the  University 
of  Oxford  by  Mr.  Sewell  twenty  years  before.  But 
in  the  mean  time  things  had  moved  forward.  The 
system  of  Local  Examinations  had  been  devised  and 
found  to  work  well.  The  times  were  ripe  for  the 
new  idea.  There  was  evidently  a  public  demand 
for  University  teaching.  Professor  Stuart's  own 
experience  had  proved  the  reality  of  that  demand 
and  the  possibility  of  satisfying  it.  He  did  not 
merely  fire  off  a  casual  suggestion  into  the  air.  He 
came  forward  with  a  practical  scheme. 

'  The  demand  for  education  exists/  he  told  the 
University.  Would  they  supply  it  or  not?  'I 
believe,'  he  wrote 2,  '  that  it  is  incumbent  on  us  to 
supply  it,  and  I  believe  that  some  such  system 
which  will  carry  the  benefits  of  the  University 
through  the  country  is  necessary,  in  order  to  retain 
the  University  in  that  position  with  respect  to  the 

1  A  Letter  on  University  Extension,  addressed  to  the  Besident 
Members  of  the  University  of  Cambridge,  by  James  Stuart.     Cam- 
bridge,  1871. 

2  Letter  on  University  Extension,  quoted  above. 

F   4 


68  HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME    TO   BE. 

education  of  the  country  which  it  has  hitherto  held, 
and  to  continue  in  its  hands  that  permeating  in- 
fluence which  it  is  desirable  that  it  should  possess.5 
It  was  now  admitted  on  all  hands  that  the  Univer- 
sities were  not  clusters  of  private  establishments, 
but  national  institutions.  Pressing  this  home,  he 
argued  that  some  such  scheme  as  he  advocated 
would  be  c  a  great  step  towards  making  the  Univer- 
sities truly  national  institutions,  and  be  no  less 
beneficial  to  them  than  to  the  country.' 

For,  if  the  University  is  a  national  institution,  it 
should  so  accommodate  its  arrangements  as  to  make 
some  of  them  available  for  everybody.  That  was 
the  drift  of  the  new  demand.  '  By  permitting  the 
residence  of  non- collegiate  students,'  Professor 
Stuart  wrote,  '  we  have  taken  a  great  step  towards 
rendering  our  Universities  accessible  to  all  classes.' 
But  one  reform  inevitably  leads  to  the  suggestion 
of  another.  c  This  expression  "  all  classes ",'  he 
pointed  out,  f  only  includes  those  who  can  procure 
some  years  of  continuous  leisure,  which  is  far 
harder  to  get  than  the  requisite  money.  Among 
those  classes  whose  circumstances  debar  them  from 
residing  at  a  University  there  exists  a  widespread 
desire  for  higher  education  of  a  systematic  kind/ 

Professor  Stuart's  proposals  had  at  their  back 
the  force  of  the  new  educational  movement.  Long 
and  bitter  controversy  had  ended  in  the  Elemen- 
tary Education  Act.  A  fresh  interest  had  been 
awakened  in  the  question.  The  public  mind  had 


HOW   EXTENSION    HAS    COME    TO    BE.  G9 

been  prepared  for  educational  advance.  The  desire 
for  higher  education  had  been  quickened.  Far- 
seeing  people  perceived  that,  when  the  seeds  of 
elementary  education  had  been  sown,  a  new  genera- 
tion would  arise  with  new  ideals  of  life  and  new 
gifts  of  knowledge.  Something  must  be  done  be- 
times for  that  generation,  or  the  very  education 
with  which  the  State  had  decided  to  equip  it  would 
prove  a  national  danger.  Education  must  not  end 
with  the  school. 

But  what  was  to  be  done  ?  Would  it  be  enough 
to  offer  them  mere  popular  lectures?  This,  Pro- 
fessor Stuart  said,  would  be  like  giving  them  a 
stone  when  they  cried  for  bread.  The  Universities 
could  supply  instead  the  right  kind  of  teaching  and 
the  right  kind  of  teachers.  Their  high  position 
would  cause  '  the  scheme  to  be  favourably  viewed, 
and  enable  it  successfully  to  overcome  those 
crotchets  and  oppositions  which  every  new  scheme 
has  to  encounter.' 

There  were  three  kinds  of  objector.  There  was 
the  man  who  said  the  Universities  could  not  afford 
the  money:  the  man  who  said  that,  if  they  esta- 
blished Extension  teaching,  the  number  of  under- 
graduates would  decline:  and  the  man  who  said 
that  the  University  ought  not  to  court  rebuff  by 
making  over-sanguine  proposals. 

Professor  Stuart  answered  them  all.  To  the 
first  he  replied  that  he  knew  that  University 
funds  were  not  inexhaustible,  but  '  I  do  not  fear  on 


70  HOW   EXTENSION    HAS    COME    TO    BE. 

that  point,  because  the  nation  has  always  shown 
itself  ready  to  give  and  to  transfer  money  into 
those  hands  which,  it  believes,  will  use  it  well  and 
for  truly  national  work.'  To  the  second  he  replied 
that,  so  far  from  diminishing  the  existing  numbers 
of  the  University,  Extension  teaching  would  act  as 
a  feeder  to  it.  To  the  third  he  replied  that  '  in  any 
scheme  we  must  be  prepared  to  meet  with  dis- 
appointments and  in  some  quarters  with  want  of 
response  ....  I  believe,'  he  continued,  c  that  it  is 
not  only  our  duty  to  foster  and  encourage  a  demand 
for  education  wherever  it  exists,  but,  by  the  attitude 
we  assume,  to  endeavour  to  call  it  up  where  it  does 
not  exist  or  has  not  the  energy  to  express  itself.' 

He  was  right  in  saying  that  University  Extension 
would  not  be  without  its  disappointments.  He 
was  also  right  in  his  prophecy  that  it  would  in  no 
way  lessen,  but  would  rather  tend  to  increase,  the 
number  of  resident  students.  But  his  anticipation 
of  national  aid  for  the  educational  work  of  Uni- 
versity Extension  has  not  yet  been  fulfilled.  The 
State  has  wisely  helped  the  local  colleges :  it  has 
not  yet  helped  the  local  committees  which  are 
trying  to  secure  as  many  as  possible  of  the  advan- 
tages of  a  local  college  for  small  towns. 

Professor  Stuart's  letter  led  to  a  shower  of  me- 
morials. To  consider  them,  the  University  ap- 
pointed a  Syndicate  in  I8721.  The  Syndicate  at 

1  The  Calendar  of  Cambridge  Local  Lectures  for  1 880-81. 
Historical  Sketch  of  the  Progress  of  Local  Lectures,  p.  5. 


HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME   TO    BE.  71 

once  undertook  a  systematic  enquiry  into  the 
alleged  demand  for  courses  of  University  lectures. 
In  the  following  year  they  reported  in  favour  of 
adopting,  for  an  experimental  period,  the  new 
scheme.  They  made  it  however  a  condition  that 
the  requisite  funds  should  be  provided  by  the  local 
authorities.  Thus  University  Extension  became 
an  official  fact. 


THE  FIRST  PEOGBAMME  or  UNIVEESITY  EXTEN- 
SION TEACHING. 

Its  promoters  were,  of  course,  to  a  certain  extent 
in  the  dark.  They  could  do  no  more  than  guess 
the  real  extent  of  the  demand  for  lectures.  While 
the  scheme  was  only  talked  about,  a  great  many 
people  no  doubt  took  a  sanguine  view  of  the 
desire  of  their  neighbourhood  for  University  teach- 
ing. Face  to  face  with  a  formal  offer,  the  accept- 
ance of  which  involved  a  money  payment,  a 
certain  proportion  of  the  memorialists  decided 
to  content  themselves  with  a  less  comprehen- 
sive programme  than  they  had  originally  con- 
templated. As  Professor  Stuart  has  said1,  cwe 
started  on  too  ambitious  a  scale,  and  we  had  to 
suffer  for  it.'  The  promoters  had  in  their  mind 
three  different  classes  of  persons  :  women,  young 

1  Inaugural  Address  to  the  Second  Summer  Meeting  of  University 
Extension  Students  in  Oxford,  1889,  p.  33. 


T 


72  HOW   EXTENSION    HAS    COME    TO    BE. 

men  in  the  position  of  clerks  or  shop-assistants, 
and  working-people.  The  first  idea  was  to  have 
in  each  town  a  course  specially  adapted  for  each  of 
these  classes,  and  delivered  on  different  days.  But 
this  proved,  in  almost  every  case,  too  costly.  The 
larger  towns  were  naturally  the  first  to  avail  them- 
selves of  the  new  proposals.  They  contained  a 
greater  number  of  leisured  or  educationally-minded 
people  :  they  furnished  a  larger  area  from  which  to 
draw  subscriptions.  For  some  of  these  larger 
towns  the  full  programme  was  not  too  ambitious, 
but  for  the  smaller  and  poorer  towns,  after  the 
first  burst  of  enthusiasm  had  flagged,  it  was  practi- 
cally out  of  the  question. 

THE  DIFFICULTIES  WHICH  IT  ENCOUNTERED. 

The  fact  was  that  in  most  places  no  really  general 
demand  for  higher  education  existed.  It  had  to  be 
created  almost  everywhere,  and  in  many  towns  the 
work  has  still  to  be  done.  In  every  place  a  few  of 
the  leading  inhabitants,  the  majority,  perhaps,  of  the 
professional  classes,  a  fair  number  of  tradesmen, 
and  not  a  few  working-men,  were  keenly  alive  to 
the  value  of  the  lectures  which  the  University  of 
Cambridge  had  decided  to  offer.  There  was  abun- 
dant reason  that  their  desire  for  higher  education 
should  be  met.  But  the  difficulty  was  that  there 
were  so  few  people  who  really  felt  the  desire. 
Without  the  assistance  of  others,  they  could  hardly 


HOW    EXTENSION   HAS    COME    TO    BE.  73 

be  expected  to  support  the  considerable  expense 
of  the  full  programme  of  lectures.  However,  the 
establishment  of  University  Extension  Teaching 
stimulated  such  people  everywhere.  It  made  them 
eager  to  secure  its  advantages  for  their  own  town. 
Perhaps  in  some  cases  they  overestimated  the  public 
interest  in  the  work.  But  it  was  even  a  gain  that 
they  should  realise  the  facts.  Many  persons,  when 
they  discovered  how  languid  an  interest  was  taken 
by  their  fellow-citizens  in  higher  education,  set  to 
work  to  put  things  right.  And  thus  in  a  sense 
University  Extension  was  instrumental  in  forming 
in  many  towns  a  kind  of  educational  garrison. 

But  in  a  few  of  the  larger  towns  the  complete 
programme  was  at  once  adopted.  And,  as  its 
direct  outcome,  the  foundation-stone  of  University 
College  was  laid  at  Nottingham  in  1877.  The 
generosity  of  Mr.  Mark  Firth  led  to  the  establish- 
ment of  a  similar  college  in  Sheffield.  The  College 
of  Science  in  Leeds  (now  the  Yorkshire  College) 
soon  appointed  Professors  of  Literature.  In  Liver- 
pool the  movement  began  which  has  resulted  in 
the  foundation  of  University  College. 

It  is,  of  course,  far  from  being  the  case  that  the 
establishment  of  these  colleges  was  due  only  to 
University  Extension.  They  were  the  outcome  of 
the  same  general  movement  of  which  University 
Extension  is  only  one  of  the  expressions.  But  at 
the  same  time  there  can  be  no  doubt  that  the  local 
supporters  of  these  great  institutions  found  in  the 


74  HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME    TO    BE. 

new  efforts  of  the  Universities,  if  not  direct 
assistance,  at  all  events  stimulus  and  encourage- 
ment. 

In  the  foundation  of  one  of  these  local  colleges, 
Oxford  took  a  prominent  part.  This  was  in  the 
case  of  University  College,  Bristol.  The  movement 
for  the  establishment  of  that  college  began  among 
the  inhabitants  of  Bristol  themselves ;  and  to  aid 
this  movement,  two  Oxford  Colleges  (New  College 
and  Balliol)  offered  to  give  ^300  a  year  for  five 
years l.  The  Bristol  College  was  opened  in  October, 
1876. 


THE  FOUNDATION  OP  THE  LONDON  EXTENSION 
SOCIETY. 

In  the  meantime  something  had  been  done  in 
London.  In  1876  a  society  was  formed  there,  under 
the  presidency  of  Mr.  Goschen,  for  the  Extension  of 
University  Teaching,  the  three  Universities,  Oxford, 
Cambridge  and  London,  consenting  to  send  re- 
presentatives to  a  joint  board,  the  functions  of 
which  were  to  advise  the  council  of  the  society 
on  educational  matters. 


1  University   of  Oxford   Commission,    Oct.    1877.      Minutes   of 
Evidence  of  Rev.  B.  Jowett,  p.  155. 


HOW  EXTENSION  HAS  COME  TO  BE.         75 

THE  UNIVEESITY  OF  OXFORD  ENTERS  ON  THE 
WORK. 

The  question  of  University  Extension  Teach- 
ing was  brought  before  the  Oxford  Commission 
of  1877  by  Mr.  Jowett  (now  Master  of  Balliol). 
He  pointed  out  'the  considerable  movement  for 
secondary  adult  education  then  going  on  in  the 
large  towns/  and  urged  that  the  Universities  should 
'take  a  little  pains'  about  it.  In  conclusion  he 
made  two  practical  proposals  to  the  commissioners : 
c  one  that  there  should  be  an  office  for  University 
Extension  and  a  secretary  paid  by  the  University  ; 
and  the  other  that  the  tenure  of  non-resident  fellow- 
ships should  be  capable  of  extension  in  the  case 
of  persons  lecturing  or  holding  professorships  in 
the  large  towns  V 

The  year  after  Mr.  Jowett  gave  his  evidence,  the 
University  of  Oxford  offered  for  the  first  time  to 
make  arrangements  for  University  Extension  .lec- 
tures on  its  own  account.  As  had  been  the  case 
five  years  before  in  Cambridge,  the  University 
supplemented  its  machinery  for  Local  Examinations 
by  a  system  of  Local  Lectures,  while,  by  a  happy 
coincidence,  the  Delegates  appointed  as  their  secre- 
tary for  this  new  purpose  Mr.  Arthur  Acland, 
whose  father  had  been  chiefly  instrumental  in 
framing  the  parent-system  of  Local  Examinations. 

1  University  of  Oxford  Commission,  Oct.  1877.  Minutes  of 
Evidence  of  Rev.  B.  Jowett,  p.  155. 


76  HOW   EXTENSION    HAS    COME    TO    BE. 

The  new  scheme  was  now  fairly  launched.  There 
followed  a  period  of  somewhat  slow  growth.  In 
some  places  the  new  ground  was  ready  for  the 
new  work.  Here  there  was  small  difficulty.  But 
in  most  towns  it  was  an  uphill  fight  to  keep 
the  courses  going.  In  many  the  work  flickered, 
and  then  for  a  time  went  out.  For  the  great 
majority  of  towns  in  England,  University  Extension 
was  before  its  time.  And  this  was  especially  true 
of  the  less  populous  manufacturing  centres  and  the 
smaller  country  towns.  It  became  clear  that  all 
towns  were  not  ready  for  the  same  dose  of  Uni- 
versity Extension  Teaching,  and  that  some  could 
only  take  it  in  homoeopathic  quantities. 

There  was  need  therefore  for  two  things :  for 
patience  to  wait  until  the  public  mind  had  caught 
the  desire  for  University  Extension  courses,  and  for 
some  re-adjustment  of  the  system  in  order  to  make 
it  more  available  for  the  smaller  towns  and  the 
poorer  districts  of  large  ones.  The  experience 
gained  in  the  first  ten  years  of  University  Exten- 
sion threw  light  on  the  best  ways  of  overcoming 
the  difficulties  which  impeded  its  further  develop- 
ment. 

It  was  obvious  that  University  Extension  must 
be  made  cheaper.  Many  towns,  which  would  gladly 
have  tried  the  scheme,  shrank  from  the  pecuniary 
liability  which  its  adoption  would  involve.  Some 
few  places  looked  back  ruefully  on  a  previous 
deficit,  and,  generally  speaking,  such  of  the  working- 


HOW   EXTENSION    HAS    COME    TO    BE.  77 

men's  societies  as  possessed  funds  available  for 
educational  purposes,  thought  the  lectures  too  dear. 
But  the  smaller  towns  and  the  poor  districts  of  the 
larger  cities  were  exactly  the  quarters  in  which 
many  of  the  promoters  of  University  Extension 
were  most  anxious  that  the  movement  should 
spread.  In  other  words,  financial  difficulties  ham- 
pered its  growth  on  the  two  sides  where  growth 
was  most  needed.  How  could  these  difficulties  be 
overcome?  The  fees  paid  to  the  lecturers  could 
not  be  reduced,  if  the  services  of  the  right  kind  of 
men  were  to  be  retained:  local  expenses  had 
already  been  brought  down  to  the  lowest  level. 
The  one  possible  remedy  was  to  offer  shorter 
courses ;  to  give  localities,  as  it  were,  a  sample  of 
University  Extension  teaching.  Such  an  arrange- 
ment would  go  far  towards  halving  the  cost,  and 
would  enable  the  poorer  centres  to  make  a  be- 
ginning. It  would  also,  what  was  of  real  practical 
importance,  make  it  easier  for  a  small  group  of 
earnest  students,  themselves  unable  to  meet  the 
expense  of  a  larger  course,  to  raise  in  their  locality 
subscriptions  to  the  necessary  amount.  A  few 
poor  students,  who  would  despair  of  begging 
guarantees  for  an  outlay  of  ^60,  would  attack  in 
good  heart  the  smaller  task  of  raising  ^30.  And  it 
was  felt  that  the  local  committees  might  be  safely 
trusted  to  work  their  way  up  to  the  longer  course, 
with  its  proportionately  heavier  expenses,  when 
they  had  once  contrived  to  make  both  ends  meet 


78  HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME    TO   BE. 

in  the  smaller  venture.  For,  if  University  Ex- 
tension Teaching  was  a  good  thing  and  suited  to 
local  needs,  it  seemed  obvious  that  the  local  com- 
mittees would  soon  desire  a  larger  measure  of  it. 


THE  NEW  DEPARTURE  IN  1885. 

This  system  of  shorter  courses  had  been,  it  is 
true,  occasionally  employed  before,  but  its  bold 
adoption  practically  dates  from  the  autumn  of 
1885.  In  that  year  the  whole  movement  started 
forward.  Oxford  began  work  on  a  larger  scale, 
its  new  vigour  being  largely  owing  to  the  initia- 
tive of  the  present  Headmaster  of  Eugby,  then 
President  of  Trinity  College.  A  conspicuous  fea- 
ture of  the  Oxford  work  was  its  employment  of 
the  short  course  system.  There  were  naturally 
serious  objections  to  the  policy.  Half  a  loaf  may 
be  better  than  no  bread,  but  towns  which  can 
afford  a  complete  system  of  teaching  need  not  be 
encouraged  to  content  themselves  with  one  that 
is  incomplete.  The  offer  of  a  shorter  course  might 
relax  energies  which  were  really  capable  of  se- 
curing a  full  one.  It  is  undeniable  that  there  was 
great  weight  in  this  view  of  the  question.  How- 
ever, the  policy  of  offering  short  courses  has  been 
amply  justified  by  its  results.  It  has  practically 
brought  University  Extension  within  the  reach  of 
every  town  in  England. 


HOW  EXTENSION  HAS  COME  TO  BE.        79 

THE  OXJTOBD  'TRAVELLING  LIBRARIES '  AND 
SUMMER  MEETING. 

Oxford  has  added  two  other  features  to  the  work. 
It  began  the  system  of  Travelling  Libraries  in  1885, 
and  it  started  the  Summer  Meeting  in  1888.  A 
great  difficulty  with  many  University  Extension 
students  is  that  they  cannot  lay  their  hands  on 
books  of  reference  for  the  course.  They  are  not  all 
within  reach  of  good  public  or  private  libraries. 
It  was  a  good  thing  to  send  down  to  each  lec- 
ture-centre a  fair  selection  of  the  books  recom- 
mended by  the  lecturer  for  study  during  his  course. 
Of  the  Summer  Meeting  we  have  already  spoken. 
In  1885,  f°ur  Extension  students  from  Northumber- 
land had  been  enabled  by  the  offer  of  prizes,  to  re- 
side for  a  month's  study  in  Cambridge.  But  the  idea 
of  a  general  Summer  Meeting  of  University  Exten- 
sion students  was  due  to  a  suggestion  made  by  Mr. 
Charles  Rowley  of  Manchester  to  a  small  committee 
which,  at  the  instance  of  Dr.  Paton  of  Nottingham, 
had  met  to  consider  the  possibility  of  introducing 
into  England  a  system  of  Reading  Circles,  similar 
in  point  of  arrangement  to  those  which  centre  in 
America  in  the  assembly  at  Chautauqua. 

It  was  at  once  felt  that  by  means  of  a  Summer 
Meeting  in  one  of  the  University  towns  the  Ex- 
tension movement  would  be  able  to  avail  itself  of 
the  services  of  those  resident  teachers  who,  though 


80  HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME    TO    BE. 

friendly  to  the  work,  are  prevented  by  their 
University  duties  from  taking  any  active  part  in 
it  as  lecturers.  The  students  too  would  enjoy  the 
great  advantage  offered  by  the  University  museums, 
collections  and  libraries,  and  would  gain  stimulus 
from  their  intercourse  with  one  another.  In  short? 
it  would  introduce  into  University  Extension  the 
one  element  in  which,  from  the  University  point  of 
view,  it  had  been  chief]  y  lacking — the  element  of 
c  residence.' 

The  idea  of  the  Summer  Meeting  was  at  once 
taken  up  in  Oxford,  where  already,  on  a  small 
scale,  arrangements  had  been  made  during  the 
Long  Vacations  of  some  previous  years  for  the 
accommodation,  within  College  walls,  of  elemen- 
tary schoolmasters  and  others.  The  details  of  the 
programme  for  a  large  meeting  of  students  were 
worked  out  in  the  Oxford  Extension  office,  and 
finally,  under  the  joint  supervision  of  the  Delegates 
and  a  special  committee  of  residents,  the  first 
University  Extension  Summer  Meeting  was  held 
in  August,  1888.  Another  and  still  more  successful 
meeting  followed  in  1889,  while  in  the  present 
month  (August,  1890)  meetings  are  being  held 
both  at  Oxford  and  Cambridge. 


HOW   EXTENSION    HAS    COME    TO    BE.  81 


AN  ANTICIPATION  OF  THE  IDEA  OF  THE 
SUMMER  MEETING. 

It  subsequently  transpired  that,  just  as  Mr. 
Sewell  in  1850  had  virtually  anticipated  the  idea 
of  University  Extension  Teaching,  so  another 
writer  had  made  a  happy  forecast  of  the  Summer 
Meeting.  In  a  letter  to  the  Times  of  Oct.  15,  1874, 
the  Rev.  E.  S.  Ffoulkes,  the  Vicar  of  St.  Mary's, 
Oxford,  wrote  as  follows  : — 

'The  practical  account  of  the  matter  is  that 
Oxford  is  wanted  by  the  University  for  six  months 
in  the  year,  and  no  more.  Why,  then,  should 
Oxford  be  debarred  from  accommodating  another 
University  for  the  remaining  six  ?  It  would  be  a 
vast  saving  to  the  nation  if  the  same  buildings 
which  serve  for  one  University  could  serve  for 
two.  ...  Or  ladies  might  be  invited  to  form  them- 
selves into  a  University  for  six  months.  Or,  again, 
to  suggest  the  form  which  would  involve  least 
change,  why  should  not  candidates  for  the  Local 
Examinations  be  given  the  option  of  a  residence  in 
College  rooms,  under  proper  surveillance,  for  the 
four  summer  months  which  constitute  the  Long 
Vacation,  to  prepare  for  their  examinations  ?  It  is 
quite  possible  that  numbers  of  middle-class  men 
would  only  be  too  glad  to  avail  themselves  of  a 
University  curriculum,  could  it  be  achieved  by 
four  months'  residence  continuously  during  the 

a 


82  HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME    TO   BE. 

summer.  Oxford  could  easily  be  provided  with  a 
staff  of  Tutors  and  Professors  from  its  existing 
University  to  officer  a  second.  And  how  cheap 
and  how  productive  of  work  would  that  term  be, 
which  lasted  a  period  of  four  months  without  a 
break,  and  whose  days  were  such  as  to  need  neither 
coal  nor  candle ;  nor  other  light  than  that  of  the 
sun  to  give  twelve  hours  of  study.  .  .  .  Positively 
the  only  change  which  this  would  necessitate, 
Would  be  that  colleges  should  let  their  rooms 
furnished,  so  as  to  have  them  at  their  disposal  for 
the  whole  year/ 


THE  NATURAL  CHARACTER  OF  THE  DEVELOPMENT 
OF  UNIVERSITY  EXTENSION. 

We  have  now  traced  the  history  of  University 
Extension  from  its  first  beginnings  to  its  present 
form.  So  short  a  sketch  of  so  varied  a  movement 
must  necessarily  be  incomplete.  A  great  debt  is 
owing  to  many  workers  whose  labours  and  whose 
names  cannot  even  be  mentioned  here.  But 
enough  has  been  said  to  show  how  naturally  the 
whole  systeni  has  grown  up.  One  change  has 
led  to  another,  each  development  seems  to  have 
suggested  a  further  one.  The  extension  of  the 
advantages  of  University  teaching  to  one  class 
brought  about  its  further  extension  to  a  second; 
the  machinery  of  local  examinations  seemed 


HOW   EXTENSION   HAS    COME   TO   BE.  83 

naturally  to  lend  itself  to  the  purposes  of  local 
lectures. 

It  could  hardly  have  been  otherwise.  For  it 
was  inevitable  that,  the  more  the  country  came  to 
care  for  education,  the  heavier  would  be  the  claims 
made  on  the  activity  and  resources  of  the  Uni- 
versities as  representative  of  the  highest  education 
in  the  land.  The  movement  has  gone  forward 
without  serious  check.  The  area  of  its  operations 
has  been  very  greatly  extended :  the  methods  of  its 
organization  have  been  in  all  departments  im- 
proved. There  remain,  however,  serious  difficulties 
in  the  system,  and  the  question  which  we  now 
must  face  is  how  those  difficulties  can  be  met. 


G    2 


CHAPTER  III. 

UNIVERSITY   EXTENSION:  HAS   IT   A 
FUTURE 1 


IN  the  foregoing  pages  we  have  sketched  the 
system  of  University  Extension  as  it  now  exists, 
and  have  traced  its  growth  from  small  beginnings 
to  its  present  magnitude.  It  has  been  successful 
beyond  the  expectation  of  its  most  ardent  sup- 
porters. Is  it,  however,  destined  to  take  its  place 
among  the  permanent  institutions  of  the  country  ? 
Or  is  it  merely  a  mushroom  growth  which  will  die 
down  and  disappear  ?  Has  its  rapid  development 
been  due  to  the  fact  that  it  both  meets  and  stimu- 
lates a  real  and  growing  demand  in  the  country 
for  higher  adult  education,  or  merely  to  novelty 
which  will  fade  away  and  to  the  ardour  of  a  few 
men  who  will  forsake  it  ?  Such  are  the  questions 
which  are  being  asked  by  many  competent  ob- 
servers, some  of  whom,  while  friendly  to  the  move- 
ment, are  a  little  distrustful  of  the  future  of  what 
one  of  them  has  called  'the  Salvation  Army  of 
Education.' 


HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTURE  ?  go 

The  question  of  the  future  is  a  question  of  men. 
It  is  necessary,  therefore,  to  enquire  what  different 
kinds  of  workers  University  Extension  needs.  Now 
the  personnel  of  the  system  may  be  shortly  de- 
scribed as  the  lecturer  and  his  audience,  the  local 
organizers  who  provide  the  audience,  and  the 
central  organizers  who  provide  the  lecturer.  The 
system  exists  for  the  sake  of  the  students ;  three 
distinct  kinds  of  workers  combine  to  meet  the 
students'  wants.  Let  us  consider  the  different 
characteristics  which  it  is  desirable  that  these 
different  workers  should  possess. 


UNIVERSITY  EXTENSION  NEEDS  MEN. 
i.  LECTURERS. 

It  is  clear  that  University  Extension  is  a  special 
kind  of  work,  and  it  follows  that  the  man  who  is 
fully  to  succeed  in  it  will  need  a  combination  of 
qualities.  It  is  in  reality  a  new  profession,  and 
cannot  be  casually  recruited  from  among  those 
who  feel  themselves  unlikely  to  succeed  in  any 
of  the  more  recognised  callings.  University  Ex- 
tension is,  in  fact,  in  competition  with  the  other 
professions  for  the  services  of  the  best  men  whom 
the  Universities  turn  out.  It  is  an  occupation 
which  must  always  tax  the  strength  and  the  re- 
sourcefulness of  the  men  who  engage  in  it.  And, 
while  this  will  be  the  case  even  when  the  work 


86  HAS   EXTENSION   A   FUTURE  ? 

has  settled  down  into  a  more  humdrum  stage,  it 
is  yet  more  true  of  the  present  time  when  it  has 
still  to  be  pushed  forward  as  an  experimental 
scheme,  and  while  large  sections  of  the  public  have 
to  be  convinced  of  its  usefulness.  Moreover,  the 
lecturers  are  called  upon  to  represent  their  Uni- 
versity in  a  very  conspicuous  manner.  As  the 
Vice-Chancellor  of  the  University  said  at  the  Ex- 
tension Conference  held  in  Oxford  in  1887,  'The 
lecturers  whom  we  send  through  the  country  are 
a  kind  of  missionary ;  wherever  they  go,  they 
carry  on  their  foreheads  the  name  of  the  University 
they  represent.  To  a  great  many  of  those  persons 
with  whom  they  come  in  contact,  it  is  the  only 
opportunity  afforded  of  what  Oxford  means  and 
what  is  meant  by  the  powers  of  an  Oxford  edu- 
cation1/ It  is  of  the  highest  importance,  therefore, 
that  the  profession  of  University  Extension  teach- 
ing should  command  and  attach  to  itself  the  ser- 
vices of  men  who  are  not  unworthy  to  represent 
the  University. 

A  man  who  is  choosing  his  work  in  life 
naturally  considers  two  things :  his  own  special 
qualifications,  and  the  career  which  is  offered  by 
the  calling  for  which  those  qualifications  seem  to 
fit  him.  Our  attention  is  now  claimed  by  the 
qualifications  which  are  desirable  for  the  career  of 
a  University  Extension  lecturer. 

1  Report  of  a  Conference  in  Oxford  on  the  Extension  of  University 
Teaching.  Oxford,  1887,  p.  30. 


HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTURE  ?  87 

In  the  first  place,  any  lecturer  who  is  to  take  an 
active  part  in  the  work  must  be  strong  enough  to 
bear  considerable  fatigue.  His  occupation  entails  long 
and  frequent  journeys.  In  the  future,  the  amount 
of  travelling  may,  in  the  case  of  some  of  the  lec- 
turers, be  reduced  to  a  minimum :  groups  of  neigh- 
bouring towns,  separated  from  one  another  by  short 
distances  only,  may  combine  together  to  retain 
for  brief  periods  the  whole  time  of  a  small  staff 
of  lecturers.  Those  whom  the  Master  of  Balliol 
once  compared  to  'local  preachers/  may  thus  re- 
ceive appointments  to  special  '  circuits  '  for  a  short 
term  of  years.  But  it  will  always  be  incumbent 
on  some  of  the  lecturers,  and  it  is  now  incumbent 
on  all  of  them,  to  make  long  journeys  from  one 
centre  to  another.  It  is  this  need  of  considerable 
physical  strength  which  makes  it  doubtful  whether 
many  women,  admirably  adapted  as  some  of  them 
have  proved  to  be  for  the  work,  will  ever  be  able 
to  undertake  much  of  it  or  to  make  it  their  chief 
occupation.  Moreover,  the  task  of  repeatedly  lec- 
turing to  large  audiences  involves  strain  and  ex- 
citement. The  very  intensity  of  the  interest  which 
the  good  lecturer  takes  in  his  work  carries  with 
it  the  danger  of  overstimulation  and  consequent 
reaction. 

Next,  on  the  side  of  knowledge,  the  lecturer  must 
possess  some  University  distinction  as  evidence 
that  he  is  competent  to  teach  the  subject,  or  group 
of  subjects,  on  which  he  proposes  to  lecture.  It  is, 


88  HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTURE  1 

however,  the  man  of  sound  knowledge  and  many 
interests,  rather  than  the  learned  specialist,  who  is 
needed  for  the  work  of  University  Extension.  Mere 
knowledge  of  his  subject  is  not  enough.  He  will 
often  have  to  lecture  to  people  who  need  convincing 
that  it  is  a  subject  of  interest  and  importance  to 
them.  In  order,  then,  to  realise  the  best  way  of 
teaching  it,  he  must  be  able  to  put  himself  in  their 
place :  he  must  be  capable  of  taking  an  outside 
view  of  his  subject.  He  must  also  be  able  to 
make  his  hearers  feel  the  place  which  it  occupies 
in  the  wide  field  of  knowledge  ;  he  must  know  how 
to  appeal  to  the  varied  information  possessed  by  an 
audience  consisting  largely  of  adults,  in  such  a  way 
that  each  may  find  in  his  previous  knowledge  a 
foundation  for  his  new  study.  The  lecturer  does 
not  deal  with  children,  but  with  grown  men  and 
women.  He  must  therefore  make  their  practical 
experience  of  life  tell  on  the  subject  which  he  com- 
mends to  their  attention.  Further,  he  must  seek 
to  communicate  to  his  students  a  correct  impres- 
sion of  the  different  importance  of  the  different 
parts  of  his  subject;  he  must  have  instinctive  tact 
in  selecting  salient  points. 

But  he  has  to  address  large  audiences,  and  not  to 
teach  in  small  class-rooms  where  a  conversational 
method  of  instruction  is  suitable.  He  must  have  some 
of  the  powers  which  go  to  make  a  good  platform- 
speaker.  He  cannot  afford  to  bore  his  hearers,  for 
they  are  not  compelled  to  come  to  listen  to  him 


HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTURE  \  89 

again.  It  is  his  difficult  task  to  combine  the 
lucidity  and  force  of  good  platform-speaking  with 
the  accuracy  and  precision  of  language  which 
characterise  the  scholar. 

His  success  as  a  teacher  will  depend  on 
his  convincing  his  audience  that  he  is  in  intel- 
lectual sympathy  with  them.  It  will  not  do  for 
him  intellectually  to  despise  them.  He  is  facing 
an  audience  which  comprises  persons  whose  ex- 
perience has  lain  in  channels  of  which  he  himself 
knows  little  or  nothing.  In  a  sense,  he  is  a 
specialist  in  one  subject,  addressing  persons  who 
are  themselves  specialists  in  fifty  others.  The  re- 
lation then  between  the  lecturer  and  his  audience 
is  rightly  one  of  mutual  respect.  Many  indeed 
there  will  be  among  his  hearers  who  have  been 
compelled  by  other  claims,  of  household  duty  or  of 
business  life,  to  forego  the  opportunities  for  study 
which  he  himself  has  enjoyed.  But  this  does  not 
mean  that  they  have  experienced  in  their  lives 
none  of  the  mental  discipline,  the  concentrated 
application,  the  need  of  judgment  and  criticism, 
which  have  been  the  forces  education  has  brought 
to  bear  on  his  own  life.  Above  all  things,  the 
lecturer  must  have  moral  earnestness,  and  must 
care  deeply  for  the  subjects  which  he  teaches.  He 
must  therefore  have  a  high  ideal  of  the  responsi- 
bilities and  possibilities  of  his  occupation. 

He  will  have  to  come  in  contact  with  many 
different  classes  of  people :  he  will  often  have 


90  HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTURE  ? 

to  lecture  to  ladies  in  the  afternoon,  and  to  work- 
ing men  at  night.  This  will  call  for  a  good  deal  of 
skill  in  handling  his  subject,  so  as  to  present  it  in 
a  form  suitable  for  both  kinds  of  audience.  It  will 
not  do  for  his  lectures  to  be  stereotyped. 

Again,  in  many  places  his  advice  will  be  sought  on 
matters  of  organization.  The  most  successful  lecturers 
have  been  those  who,  like  Mr.Moulton,  of  Cambridge, 
have  given  great  attention  to  the  practical  means 
of  arranging  associations  of  students,  federations  of 
centres,  and  other  matters  which,  though  primarily 
concerned  with  the  business  side  of  the  work,  are 
still  of  importance  to  the  teacher,  because  they 
consolidate  the  system  in  which  he  is  employed,  or 
improve  the  material  with  which  he  has  to  deal. 
A  lecturer  with  a  turn  for  organization  will  thus 
find  constant  opportunities  for  usefully  employing 
it.  University  Extension,  in  a  word,  needs  men  who 
belong  exclusively  neither  to  the  academic  nor  to 
the  business  worlds,  but  who  can  sympathise  with 
the  aims  and  interests  of  both. 

Such  is  the  kind  of  lecturer  that  is  wanted 
for  the  purposes  of  University  Extension.  It 
will  be  at  once  said  that  it  is  out  of  the  question 
to  hope  for  such  paragons  ;  that  they  do  not  exist ; 
and  that,  if  they  did,  the  life  of  University  Exten- 
sion has  nothing  in  it  to  tempt  them.  Our  answer 
to  this  criticism  must  be  that  we  are  only  describ- 
ing an  unattained  ideal,  but  that  you  are  more 
likely  to  get  such  men  if  you  say  plainly  that  you 


HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTURE  1  91 

want  them.  We  have  stated  the  qualities,  as  many 
as  possible  of  which  it  is  desirable  that  the  ideal 
lecturer  should  possess.  We  are  far  from  saying 
that  University  Extension  is  a  forlorn  hope  unless 
every  lecturer  possesses  all  of  them. 

And  a  good  deal  can  be  done  by  having  some- 
thing to  aim  at.  When  a  man  takes  up  University 
Extension  lecturing,  he  is  bound  to  be  rather  in  the 
dark  as  to  what  is  expected  of  him,  and  rather  at 
a  loss  to  know  how  best  to  prepare  himself  for  a 
work  of  which  he  can  only  guess  the  difficulties. 
It  is  therefore  important  to  consider  how  such  a 
man  can  be  helped.  Can  he  serve  an  apprentice- 
ship which  will  teach  him  his  business  ?  Can  he 
be  given  anything  worthy  of  the  name  of  training  ? 
Can  a  supply  of  good  lecturers  be  artificially  created  ? 
Or  is  it  wholly  a  question  of  temperament  and 
natural  gifts,  which  no  training  can  give  ? 


THE  TRAINING  OF  LECTURERS. 

The  truth  probably  is  that  without  certain  na- 
tural qualifications  a  man  can  never  become  a  good 
lecturer.  And  some  few  men  may  perhaps  be 
gifted  enough  to  dispense  with  any  formal  training. 
Their  earlier  experience  may  have  been  of  a  kind  to 
prepare  them  for  this  special  work.  But  in  the 
case  of  the  majority,  it  seems  reasonable  to  suppose 
that  a  method  of  training  could  be  devised,  which 


92  HAS   EXTENSION   A   FUTURE  ? 

would  develope  natural  gifts  and  make  good  material 
into  better. 

Such  training  however  is  beset  with  many  diffi- 
culties. No  University  Extension  centre  likes  to 
be  practised  on.  When  a  committee  pay  for  a 
lecturer,  they  naturally  want  a  man  who  knows  how 
to  do  his  work.  Therefore,  when  a  lecturer  accepts 
an  engagement,  he  must  go  out  ready  to  succeed. 
But  this  is  like  telling  him  that,  when  he  is  thrown 
into  the  water,  he  must  be  able  to  swim.  Some- 
thing may  be  done,  of  course,  by  charging  different 
fees  for  different  lecturers  according  to  their  ex- 
perience. A  centre  would  then,  if  it  liked  to  take 
raw  material,  get  it  cheap.  But  it  so  happens  that 
the  towns  which  find  it  most  difficult  to  raise  funds 
for  Extension  Lectures  are  generally  those  for 
which  an  experienced  lecturer  is  most  needed. 
The  local,  promoters  are  often  new  to  the  work ; 
they  want  therefore  a  man  who  knows  how  to 
help  them  by  the  practical  suggestions  which  a 
young  lecturer  is  less  able  to  make.  And  the 
probability  is  that  when  a  centre  has  only  been 
established  with  difficulty,  the  lecturer  will  have 
to  deal  with  an  audience  which  needs  a  kind  of 
lecture  that  is  extremely  hard  to  give.  It  is  an 
old  saying  that  a  man  must  know  a  great  deal  of 
his  subject  before  he  can  teach  the  elements  of  it. 
A  young  lecturer  fresh  from  his  studies  is  almost 
always  more  difficult  to  follow,  and  more  elaborate 
in  his  treatment,  than  one  who  has  more  know- 


I 


HAS   EXTENSION   A   FUTURE  ?  93 

ledge  and  experience.  He  has  not  yet  learnt  what 
to  leave  out.  Now  the  danger  of  charging  lower 
fees  for  young  lecturers  is  that  the  very  centres 
which  need  an  experienced  man  may  content  them- 
selves with  comparative  inexperience  because  it  is 
cheaper.  On  the  other  hand,  it  is  obviously  reason- 
able that  the  fee  paid  for  a  lecturer  should  bear 
some  sort  of  relation  to  his  experience  and  merit. 
The  local  committee  which  engages  and  pays  for 
him,  hopes  to  recoup  itself  by  the  sale  of  tickets 
of  admission  to  the  lectures.  It  is  clear,  therefore, 
that  an  attractive  lecturer  at  a  high  fee  may  be  in 
the  end  as  cheap  as  a  less  attractive  lecturer  at  a 
lower  one.  The  practical  upshot  of  these  considera- 
tions is  that  different  fees  are  rightly  charged  for 
lecturers  of  different  experience,  but  that  it  would 
be  a  mistake  to  offer,  even  at  the  lowest  fee  of  all, 
a  class  of  lecturers  who  had  still  to  learn  the  rudi- 
ments of  their  business.  Every  one  who  goes  out 
to  lecture  must  somehow  or  other  have  learnt  his 
trade. 

But  how  can  he  learn  it  without  accepting  an 
ordinary  paid  engagement  ?  It  may  be  pointed 
out  that  many  a  man  accepts  a  post  as  a  school- 
master who  has  never  done  any  teaching.  Why 
should  not  then  a  lecturer  accept  an  engagement 
before  he  has  done  any  lecturing?  The  answer  to 
this  lies  in  the  difference  between  the  positions  of 
a  lecturer  and  of  a  schoolmaster.  The  latter  is 
usually  engaged  for  a  considerable  period — a  term 


91  HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTURE"  1 

or  a  year.  His  employer  thinks  it  worth  his  while  to 
put  up  with  a  possible  period  of  inefficiency,  trusting 
that  afterwards  the  services  of  the  new-comer  will 
compensate  for  previous  waste.  But  the  untrained 
lecturer  is  only  invited  to  give,  say,  six  lectures,  or 
at  most  twelve.  However  quickly  he  learns  his 
work,  he  will  be  almost  at  the  end  of  his  course 
before  he  has  understood  the  best  way  to  deliver 
it.  Then,  the  young  schoolmaster  is  only  one  of 
a  staff  of  teachers  ;  he  finds  himself  one  of  a  com- 
bination; his  own  work  is  only  part  of  a  great 
organized  effort  of  teaching  ;  the  experience  of  his 
senior  colleagues  makes  up  for  his  own  want  of 
experience ;  he  can  get  advice  from  them  ;  the 
efficiency  of  the  school  is  not  simply  dependent  on 
him.  The  young  .er,  on  the  other  hand,  has 

to  stand  alone:  whatever  he  does  is  bound  to  be 
noticed,  and  the  fortunes  of  the  course  rest,  so  far 
as  teaching  goes,  on  his  unaided  exertions.  Yet 
again,  the  young  schoolmaster  is  dealing  with 
pupils  whose  attendance  is  compulsory ;  they  have 
not  themselves  paid  to  be  taught  by  him ;  they 
sometimes  even  derive  satisfaction  from  his  inex- 
perience. The  young  lecturer,  on  the  contrary, 
addresses  voluntary  hearers  ;  if  they  are  bored  by 
him,  the  remedy  is  in  their  own  hands  :  they  need 
not  come  again1. 


1  It  is  worth  noting  that,  even  in  the  case  of  schoolmasters,  the 
need  of  training  is  being  felt.  The  Headmasters  of  Clifton  and 
Winchester  are  making  experiments  in  this  matter. 


HAS.  EXTENSION   A   EUTCTRE  1  95 

In  training  himself  for  the  special  work  of 
University  Extension  a  man  has  another  great 
difficulty  to  overcome.  He  has  to  teach  himself 
to  speak  well  in  public.  This  may  be  scouted  as 
impossible.  But  it  should  be  observed  that  we  are 
not  requiring  from  him  any  remarkable  gift  of  elo- 
quence. If  he  happen  to  have  such  a  gift,  so  much 
the  better.  All  that  is  absolutely  wanted  from  a 
lecturer  is  that  he  should  be  able  to  put  his 
thoughts  into  clear  and  forcible  words,  to  arrange 
his  points  in  logical  order,  and  to  speak  them  from 
a  platform  in  a  way  to  which  it  is  pleasant  to 
listen.  Higher  gifts  of  speech  than  this  may  be 
born  in  a  man,  but  not  made  by  him.  The  art, 
however,  of  straightforward  and  effective  platform- 
speaking  is  one  that  pro*  «.  almost  any  man, 
who  has  the  necessary  physical  qualifications  and 
the  necessary  perseverance,  can  attain  for  him- 
self. It  is  obvious,  however,  that  it  will  be  a 
help  to  him  if  he  has  been  trained  to  face  an 
audience  and  to  address  it.  In  this  matter,  it 
would  appear  that  the  ordinary  Englishmen  enjoys 
fewer  advantages  than  the  ordinary  American. 
The  American  schoolboy  is  trained  for  public 
speaking.  In  his  interesting  Notes  on  American 
Schools  and  Training  Colleges1  Dr.  Fitch  quotes 
the  following  passage  from  the  programme  of  one 
of  the  Normal  Schools  in  Massachusetts : — c  No 

1  Report  of  the  Committee  of  Council  on  Education.  London, 
1889.  Appendix  to  Mr.  Fitch's  Report,  p.  500.  Dr.  Fitch's  Notes 
are  now  published  separately  by  Messrs.  Macmillan. 


96  HAS   EXTENSION  A  FUTtJEE  ? 

efforts  are  spared  to  train  the  pupils  in  self- 
reliance.  It  is  to  this  end  that  special  importance 
is  attached  to  platform  exercises.  These  occupy 
a  half  hour  or  so  every  day,  and  during  this  period 
pupils  volunteer,  each  for  five  minutes  or  more,  to 
read  or  recite  or  talk  to  the  school  upon  any  sub- 
ject which  they  may  have  chosen.  At  such  a  time 
they  have  constantly  to  meet  the  criticism  and 
questions  of  teachers  and  fellow-pupils  ;  and  thus 
the  exercise  has  been  found  to  be  valuable,  not 
only  in  training  the  pupils  to  use  the  English 
language  with  facility  and  force,  and  to  speak  with 
distinctness  and  accuracy,  but  in  bringing  them 
face  to  face  with  the  sort  of  difficulties  that  they 
may  be  expected  to  meet  in  their  profession.5 

And  in  the  University  itself  it  seems  to  be 
becoming  rarer  than  it  used  to  be  for  a  man  to 
train  himself  by  speaking  to  large  audiences. 
There  are  indeed  no  audiences  in  England  to 
which  it  is  better  practice  to  speak,  than  those 
which  assemble  for  the  weekly  debates  in  the  Uni- 
versity Union  Societies.  The  value  of  the  ex- 
perience gained  in  addressing  them  lies  in  the 
fact  that  they  do  not  hesitate  to  express  their 
feelings.  But  of  late  years,  in  Oxford  at  all 
events,  it  has  become  less  the  rule  for  a  man  with 
a  turn  for  public  speaking  to  go  to  the  Union.  A 
great  number  of  small  debating  societies  have 
sprung  up  in  the  different  colleges.  Men  feel  it 
perhaps  more  patriotic  to  support  these  college 


HAS   EXTENSION   A   FUTURE?  97 

societies.  They  find  themselves  among  friends. 
It  is  also  less  of  an  effort  to  address  a  small  society 
than  the  Union  audience.  Less  trouble  need  be 
given  to  preparation.  The  speaker  does  not  court 
public  failure.  But,  for  these  very  reasons,  a  man 
loses  a  great  deal  Who  confines  himself  to  the 
smaller  societies  and  does  not  venture  to  address 
the  larger  one.  He  often  falls  into  a  desultory, 
conversational  style  of  speaking.  He  contents 
himself  with  a  slipshod  manner  of  speech,  because 
he  has  never  accustomed  himself  to  conditions 
which,  for  success,  require  him  to  take  a  great  deal 
of  trouble,  not  only  with  what  he  says,  but  with 
how  he  says  it. 

Such  are  the  chief  difficulties  in  the  way  of 
training  lecturers  for  University  Extension.  At 
Oxford  there  is  yet  another  difficulty,  which  is 
not  unimportant.  This  is  the  absence  from  the 
University  curriculum  for  men  (not  for  women), 
of  any  systematic  training  in  English  Literature. 
Into  this  question,  which  has  its  controversial 
aspects,  we  do  not  propose  to  enter.  We  are  not 
here  concerned  with  the  question  of  a  School  of 
Literature.  We  will  only  remark  that  the  present 
arrangements  of  the  University  make  it  far  more 
difficult  to  find  a  young  man  who  is  competent 
to  lecture  on  literary  subjects  than  on  history, 
philosophy,  political  economy  or  any  branch  of 
natural  science. 


98  HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTURE? 


THE  OXFORD  METHOD  OF  SELECTING 
LECTURERS. 

IN  spite  of  all  these  obstacles,  something  has  been 
done  in  Oxford  to  train  lecturers  for  University 
Extension.  When  a  young  man  thinks  of  seeking 
appointment  as  a  lecturer,  he  sends  an  application 
to  the  Delegates.  He  must  have  passed  the  exam- 
inations required  for  a  degree.  In  order  that  the 
Delegates  may  satisfy  themselves  as  to  his  com- 
petence to  teach  the  subject  which  he  offers,  he 
gives  a  reference  to  his  College  Tutor.  The  ap- 
plicant also  has  to  show  that  he  has  already 
lectured  in  public  with  success.  If  his  application 
is  entertained,  he  comes  to  the  office  and  is  told  all 
about  the  system.  He  reads  the  official  papers. 
Generally  he  has  an  interview  with  a  senior 
lecturer.  He  tries  to  put  himself  in  touch  with 
the  work  and  to  realise  its  conditions.  Next,  he 
has  to  write  a  syllabus  of  a  course  of  lectures. 
This  is  submitted  to  the  criticism  of  an  experienced 
lecturer.  The  applicant  is  then  required  to  deliver 
in  Oxford  to  a  private  audience  the  course  of 
lectures  of  which  he  has  already  compiled  the 
syllabus.  He  is  not  paid  for  giving  the  lectures. 
They  are  sometimes  delivered  to  a  school,  but 
usually  to  the  Oxford  Diocesan  Training  College 
for  Elementary  Teachers.  He  has  there  as  his 


HAS   EXTENSION   A   FUTURE  ?  99 

audience  a  number  of  students  who  are  themselves 
being  trained  to  teach.  At  most  of  the  lectures, 
the  Secretary  and  perhaps  one  of  the  Delegates  are 
present.  After  the  lecture,  they  frankly  criticise 
him.  The  criticisms  of  the  staff  of  the  Training 
College  generally  confirm  their  verdict.  When 
the  course  is  over,  the  candidate's  application  is 
again  considered.  If  the  trial  course  has  gone 
badly,  the  candidate  commonly  himself  withdraws 
his  application,  or  asks  that  decision  may  be  post- 
poned until  he  has  had  further  practice.  If  the 
course  has  been  successful  and  the  candidate  is 
approved,  he  revises  his  syllabus  in  the  light  of  the 
experience  which  he  has  already  gained.  A  last 
step  remains,  which  is  perhaps  the  most  important 
of  all,  but  which  want  of  funds  has  prevented  from 
being  often  taken  in  practice.  The  Delegates  vote 
a  small  sum  to  enable  the  accepted  probationer  to 
visit  certain  typical  centres  and  see  the  senior 
lecturers  at  their  work.  When  this  is  done,  the 
applicant  is  added  to  the  list  of  lecturers,  and  his 
revised  syllabus  is  printed  for  him  for  circulation 
in  the  centres. 

Of  course,  this  little  experiment  in  the  way  of 
training  is  very  incomplete.  But  it  serves  as  a 
rough-and-ready  means  of  eliminating  the  unfit. 
It  is  true  that  the  process  greatly  improves  those 
who  undergo  it.  But  its  chief  advantage  is  that  it 
picks  out  the  men  who  would  be  justified  in  seek- 
ing employment  in  University  Extension. 

H  2, 


100  HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTURE? 


UNIVERSITY  EXTENSION  NEEDS  MEN. 
2.  ORGANIZERS. 

But  we  have  seen  that  University  Extension 
needs  organizers  as  well  as  lecturers.  The  Bishop 
of  London,  speaking  from  his  long  experience  in 
this  side  of  University  work,  told  the  Oxford  Con- 
ference in  1887  that  'what  is  now  particularly 
wanted  is  really  good  organization  V  Now  organi- 
zers are  needed  at  both  ends  of  the  line — in  the 
local  centres  and  in  the  central  offices.  The  nature 
of  their  duties  will  have  been  indicated  by  the 
foregoing  account  of  the  University  Extension 
system.  Nothing  need  be  said  here  beyond  the 
obvious  thing  that  the  work  of  the  organizers  is 
not  without  difficulty,  that  the  success  of  the  system 
largely  depends  on  its  manifold  details  being- 
attended  to  with  punctuality,  accuracy  and  method : 
that  it  is  desirable  for  the  organizers  to  be  acquainted 
with  the  needs  and  circumstances  of  different  parts 
of  the  country  and  with  the  kind  of  men  who 
will  suit  these  different  conditions;  that  there  is 
need  for  a  good  deal  of  thought  in  adjusting  the 
machinery  of  the  system  to  meet  new  wants ;  and 
that  it  is  impossible  for  an  undertaking,  which 

1  Report  of  Oxford  Conference  on  University  Extension,  1887, 
p.  27. 


HAS    EXTENSION    A   EUTURE ?  101 

depends  on  the  smooth  working  of  most  of  the 
railway  lines  in  England  and  on  the  health,  for  the 
worst  part  of  the  year,  of  sixty  different  lecturers, 
not  to  be  prolific  in  emergencies. 


UNIVERSITY  EXTENSION  NEEDS  MONEY. 
i.  LOCALLY. 

These  then  are  the  different  kinds  of  men  on 
securing  whose  services  the  future  of  University 
Extension  depends.  It  is  to  be  believed  that  there 
will  always  be  forthcoming  a  number  of  suitable 
persons  who  care  enough  for  national  education  to 
embark  on  the  work.  But  the  nature  of  the  occu- 
pation is  too  arduous,  its  claims  on  time  are  too 
exacting,  for  it  to  be  possible  to  depend  on  purely 
voluntary  assistance.  If  the  first  requirement  of 
University  Extension  is  men,  its  second  and  con- 
sequent need  is  money  to  support  their  work. 

Now  money  is  required  for  each  of  the  two 
chief  departments  of  University  Extension.  It  is 
needed  for  the  central  offices  and  for  the  local 
organizers. 

The  local  organizers  want  money  because  their 
financial  position  is  at  present  in  many  places,  if 
not  precarious,  at  any  rate  unsatisfactory.  We 
have  said  that  each  lecture  costs  the  students  a 
shilling  a  head.  This  is  true,  but  only  on  an 


102  HAS   EXTENSION  A  F0TUKE  ? 

average.  There  are  many  places  where  the  stu- 
dents are  so  few  that  the  cost  which  falls  on  each 
of  them  is  twice,  or  more  than  that  amount.  And 
not  only  many  small  towns,  but  great  districts 
where  the  population  consists  chiefly  of  the  work- 
ing classes,  are  debarred  from  University  Extension 
because  of  its  expense.  Even  a  shilling  a  lecture 
is  prohibitive  to  many  working  men  and  fco  those 
dependent  on  them.  Again,  in  almost  every  centre 
the  promoters  depend  partly  on  subscriptions.  In 
other  words,  the  work,  to  a  certain  extent,  depends 
on  the  contributions  of  those  who  do  not  themselves 
regularly  attend  the  lectures — that  is,  on  the  educa- 
tionally-minded benevolent  public.  It  is  not 
satisfactory  that  in  so  many  places  a  necessary 
ingredient  of  the  local  arrangements  should  be  a 
temporary  subscription  list. 

Speaking  broadly,  then,  the  University  Exten- 
sion centres  are  not  well  off.  There  are  enviable 
exceptions  ;  but,  taking  the  movement  as  a  whole, 
there  are  not  many  Local  Committees  with  a  balance 
of  £50  at  their  bankers. 

Now  this  want  of  comfortable  means  is  very 
bad  for  an  educational  work.  It  pinches  it.  It 
compels  the  local  promoters  to  have  an  eye  not 
only  to  what  is  ideally  best  for  their  students  but 
also  to  what  will  be  tempting  to  the  public.  It 
forces  them  sometimes  to  refuse  the  best  thing  and 
to  content  themselves  with  some  more  attractive 
second-best. 


HAS   EXTENSION   A   FUTUEE  ?  103 

And  this  financial  difficulty  is  really  at  the 
bottom  of  the  failure  of  many  centres  to  arrange 
the  courses  in  a  systematic  sequence.  They  cannot 
afford  to  do  so.  They  know  that  if  they  embarked 
on  a  three  years'  course  of  history  or  literature — 
such  as  the  Extension  is  perfectly  ready  at  any 
moment  to  provide,  and  thousands  of  the  more 
zealous  students  are  eager  to  undertake  —  they 
would  frighten  their  public.  Many  people,  on 
whom  they  rely  for  the  sale  of  a  certain  and  neces- 
sary proportion  of  tickets,  would  start  back  from 
the  scheme  as  too  arduous  and  too  prolonged.  Such 
persons  are  a  minority  of  the  audience,  but  their 
subscriptions  are  necessary,  and  therefore  their 
taste  for  variety  has  to  be  considered.  And  so, 
instead  of  definitely  undertaking  a  three  years' 
course  of  study,  many  local  committees  eschew 
sequence  or  disguise  it.  They  either  hop  about 
from  history  to  literature  or  from  science  to  politi- 
cal economy,  or  they  take  first  the  history  of  a 
period,  then  its  literature,  then  its  economics,  and 
so  on.  There  is  much  to  be  said,  of  course,  for 
both  these  plans.  Variety  stimulates,  and  it  is  well 
to  learn  all  about  a  period  from  every  side.  But, 
at  best,  either  plan  is  a  pis  aller.  And  the  pity  of 
it  is  that  it  is  adopted,  not  because  the  Local  Com- 
mittees always  like  such  an?  arrangement  best,  but 
because  their  purses  are  not  deep  enough  for  any- 
thing else.  It  is  want  of  money  which  causes 
want  of  educational  sequence. 


104  HAS  EXTENSION   A    FUTURE? 

Of  course  there  are  numerous  exceptions.  The 
Cambridge  affiliated  centres  undertake  excellent 
courses  of  systematic  study  extending  over  three 
or  four  years,  and  comprising  six  full  courses  of 
lectures  on  either  Arts  or  Sciences,  with  two  other 
full  courses  drawn  from  the  complementary  group 1. 
And  many  of  the  Oxford  and  London  centres  have 
made  a  brave  fight  for  sequence.  The  London 
Society  has  arranged  a  very  good  series  of  courses 
at  Gresham  College,  which  thus  serves  as  a  central 
meeting  point  for  the  London  students  2.  Every 
year  more  and  more  Oxford  centres  succeed  in 
attaining  sequence  3.  But  the  struggle  is  a  hard  one. 

And  it  must  be  admitted  that,  when  a  new 
centre  begins,  the  most  important  thing  of  all  is  to 
get  a  good  lecturer.  For  such  centres  a  sequence 
of  subjects  is  desirable,  but  a  sequence  of  good 
lecturers  is  essential.  However,  when  all  is  said, 
we  are  bound  to  admit  that  a  broad  defect  of  the 
University  Extension  system,  as  it  stands  to  day, 
is  that  the  majority  of  centres  cannot  afford  to 
devote  their  whole  energies  to  arranging  courses  in 
educational  sequence. 

If  they  had  more  money,  they  would  do  iiv  at 
once.  They  want  money  too  for  other  purposes. 
The  labour  of  local  organization  grows  heavier 
year  by  year ;  it  involves  much  clerical  work  ;  a 

1  Cambridge  Keports,  1887-90. 

2  London  Reports,  1888,  1889. 

3  Oxford  Reports,  1887-90. 


HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTURE  ?  105 

good  deal  of  it  is  necessary  but  dull ;  it  often  has 
to  be  done  under  great  pressure  of  time  ;  it  in- 
volves collecting  money.  Now  it  would  be  difficult 
to  praise  too  highly  the  devotion  with  which  the 
Local  Committee  and  their  energetic  secretaries 
have  applied  themselves  to  these  tasks.  They  have 
cheerfully  borne  an  ever  increasing  burden  of  secre- 
tarial work.  Nothing  has  proved  their  interest  in 
the  movement  more  clearly  than  the  willingness 
with  which  they  have  sacrificed  leisure  to  the  need 
of  organization.  But,  as  the  work  grows,  they  will 
begin  to  want  help.  Already  in  large  centres  they 
require  clerical  assistance.  Many  of  the  local 
secretaries,  who  are  best  fitted  for  the  work  by 
reason  of  their  business  experience  or  faculty  for 
organization,  are  very  naturally  otherwise  fully 
occupied.  Again  and  again  it  has  happened  that, 
after  two  or  three  years  of  excellent  service,  such  a 
secretary  has  been  obliged  to  resign.  With  paid 
clerical  assistance,  he  might  have  continued  to 
direct  the  local  organization  for  many  years.  Be- 
sides, a  movement  gains  by  having  an  office.  An 
office  keeps  up  the  tradition  of  the  work.  One 
secretary  resigns  and  another  succeeds  ;  the  clerk 
maintains  the  routine.  The  office  becomes  a  per- 
manent centre,  a  nucleus  for  further  extension. 
And  eventually  University  Extension  Committees 
will  want  suitable  buildings.  The  best  thing  would 
be  that  the  lecture  room  should  be  under  the  same 
roof  as,  or  in  close  connection  with,  the  Public 


106  HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTURE? 

Library.  There  has  been  recently  given  to  the 
town  of  Barnsley  such  a  building  for  use  as  a 
Public  Library  on  the  understanding  that  some 
of  the  rooms  should  be  employed  for  educational 
purposes.  Every  town  should  have,  so  far  as 
building  and  library  are  concerned,  its  own  local 
college.  So  far  as  its  professors  are  concerned,  it 
would  look  to  the  Universities  and  co-operate 
with  other  towns.  Acting  thus,  it  would  have  at 
a  small  cost,  teaching  on  a  wide  range  of  subjects 
and  the  stimulus  of  a  constant  succession  of  new 
teachers. 

There  are  many  other  purposes  for  which  the 
Local  Committees  need  money.  It  is  right  that  they 
should  always  rely  partly  on  local  subscriptions, 
but  they  should  not  remain  in  bondage  to  them. 
They  should  be  able,  if  necessary,  to  make  arrange- 
ments long  in  advance  without  incurring  rash  liabili- 
ties. They  should  be  free,  so  far  as  money  goes,  to 
seize  chances  of  getting  good  lecturers.  They  should 
be  enabled  to  supplement  their  popular  courses  with 
others  more  exclusively  adapted  for  small  classes  of 
students.  Each  considerable  town  should  have  a 
variety  of  courses  going  on  at  the  same  time. 
Many  brilliant  teachers  excel  in  inspiring  small 
classes,  but  are  ineffective  when  they  deal  with  a 
large  audience.  The  services  of  such  men  should 
be  more  largely  made  use  of  in  University  Exten- 
sion work.  Then,  again,  University  Extension  has 
hitherto  hardly  penetrated  into  the  villages.  It  is 


HAS    EXTENSION    A   FUTUEE  \  107 

almost  exclusively  an  affair  of  towns  and  suburbs. 
Local  Committees  would  gladly,  if  they  could 
afford  it,  extend  the  courses  to  the  villages  in  their 
neighbourhood,  and  into  adjacent  towns  which  had 
not  yet  made  trial  of  the  system. 

It  is  clear,  therefore,  that  the  development  of  the 
work  is  hampered  by  want  of  means.  The  need 
for  money  is  almost  entirely  a  local  need.  It  is  the 
work  of  the  local  organization,  not  that  of  the 
central  office,  which  chiefly  needs  larger  means. 


UNIVEESITY  EXTENSION  NEEDS  MONEY. 
2.  AT  HEAD-QUARTERS. 

There  is,  however,  in  our  opinion,  a  no  less  ur- 
gent need  of  larger  funds  at  head-quarters.  Far 
less  is  wanted  there  than  in  the  centres,  but 
there  is  need  for  something.  It  should  be  pos- 
sible to  engage  lecturers  at  a  permanent  stipend. 
At  present  a  lecturer  can  hardly  count  on  his 
income  for  a  year  in  advance.  It  depends  wholly 
on  his  receiving  invitations  to  lecture.  He  may 
be  morally  sure  that  the  invitations  will  come, 
but  it  is  clear  that  the  offer  of  a  fixed  salary 
in  some  other  calling  must  often  tempt  him 
away  from  an  occupation,  the  remuneration  of 
which  is  wholly  without  guarantee. 


108  HAS  EXTENSION  A  FUTURE  1 

THE  THREE  SOURCES  WHENCE  MONEY 
MAY  BE  DRAWN, 

Modest  as  may  seem  the  separate  needs  which 
we  have  sketched,  when  we  bear  in  mind  that  we 
are  speaking  not  of  a  dozen  large  towns  only,  but 
of  the  many  hundreds  of  smaller  towns  in  England, 
it  will  be  seen  that  rn  the  aggregate  the  amount 
needed  is  large.  We  must  now  consider  the  sources 
from  which  the  money  might  come.  It  might  come 
from  private  munificence,  from  the  funds  of  Univer- 
sities and  Colleges,  or  from  the  State.  In  our  judg- 
ment, all  these  sources  should  contribute  a  part. 
If  it  is  urged  that  University  Extension  should  be 
self-supporting,  we  must  reply  that,  throughout 
the  whole  of  higher  education  in  England,  part- 
endowment  is  the  rule.  No  reason  has  yet  been 
shown  why  University  Extension  should  be  treated 
as  an  exception. 

i.  PRIVATE  MUNIFICENCE. 

Much  has  already  been  done  for  University  Ex- 
tension by  the  generosity  of  individuals.  They 
have  helped  both  the  local  committees  and  the  cen- 
tral organizations.  Private  individuals  have  con- 
tributed to  the  Cambridge  permanent  fund J. 

1  Report  of  Cambridge  University  Extension  Conference,  1887, 
p.  85. 


HAS   EXTENSION   A   FUTURE  1  109 

Many  others  have  given  considerable  sums  to  the 
fund  for  the  additional  payment  of  lecturers  esta- 
blished by  the  Oxford  Delegates 1.  Scholarships 
have  been  presented,  and  books  have  been  given 
for  the  travelling  libraries.  The  London  Society 
has  a  considerable  subscription  list,  to  which,  in 
1889,  four  of  the  City  Companies  contributed.  The 
Gilchrist  Trustees  gave  j£°2oo  to  the  same  Society 
in  iSSg2.  The  Gilchrist  Trustees  have  recently 
taken  steps  aimed  at  making  the  lectures,  which, 
as  is  well  known,  they  annually  arrange  in  a 
large  number  of  towns,  preliminary  to  University 
Extension  courses.  In  the  future,  donors  may  be 
forthcoming  to  endow  lectureships  for  their  own 
counties  or  neighbourhood,  just  as  professorial 
chairs  have  been  established  in  the  Universities 
and  Colleges  by  private  munificence.  While,  how- 
ever, it  is  to  be  hoped  that  the  liberality  of  indi- 
viduals will  continue  to  help  the  movement,  it 
must  be  admitted  that  up  to  the  present  the  source 
of  private  generosity  has  not  been  sufficient  ade- 
quately to  supply  its  needs. 

1  Oxford  Report,  1889-90. 

2  London  Eeport,  1889. 


110  HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTURE 


2.  THE  UNIVERSITIES  AND  COLLEGES. 

It  has  been  pointed  out  on  an  earlier  page l  that 
the  Universities  already  contribute  towards  the 
expenses  of  the  work.  They  provide  the  general 
Secretaries,  their  clerks,  and  their  offices.  We 
have  not  before  us  the  Cambridge  accounts,  but 
from  the  balance-sheets  presented  by  the  Delegates 
of  the  University  of  Oxford  since  1886,  it  appears 
that  the  University  does  not  contribute  to  the  pay- 
ment of  the  lecturers  or  to  the  local  expenses  of 
the  work. 

Some  critics  in  the  newspapers  have  held  that 
the  Universities  should  do  more.  It  has,  however, 
been  pointed  out  that,  as  institutions,  the  Univer- 
sities are  poor  when  the  heavy  claims  on  them  are 
considered.  In  1887  the  Secretary  of  the  Cam- 
bridge Syndicate  pointed  out  that  '  the  University 
of  Cambridge  is  poor  in  money2.'  In  the  same 
year,  the  Vice-Chancellor  of  the  University  made 
a  similar  statement  with  regard  to  Oxford.  '  The 
University/  he  remarked,  'is  not  a  rich  body  in 
comparison  to  the  demands  made  upon  it  V  The 
published  accounts  of  the  Universities  entirely 
confirm  these  statements.  The  Universities  have 
large  incomes,  but  there  are  large  established  calls 
on  those  incomes. 

1  P.  22. 

2  Report  of  Cambridge  Extension  Conference',  1887,  PP-  7T>  77- 

3  Report  of  Oxford  Extension  Conference,  1887,  p.  28. 


HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTURE  ?  Ill 

As,  however,  was  pointed  out  on  the  same  occa- 
sions, in  matters  of  finance  as  well  as  in  govern- 
ment, the  Colleges  are  largely  separate  from  the 
University.  It  is  not  impossible  that  some  of  the 
Colleges  might  be  able  to  render  financial  aid  to 
University  Extension  work. 

In  discussing  this  matter,  we  would  again  remind 
the  reader  that  we  speak  only  in  our  individual 
capacity  as  members  of  the  University.  We  feel, 
however,  that  it  is  better  for  us  frankly  to  state 
our  own  opinion.  In  our  judgment,  University 
Extension  work  has  claims  on  a  larger  measure 
of  financial  aid  from  either  University  funds  or 
collegiate  revenues.  The  University  and  the  Col- 
leges both  gain  by  the  movement.  The  Colleges 
have  already  found  in  it  a  means  of  employment 
for  many  of  their  younger  graduates.  The  Uni- 
versity, as  a  whole,  derives  from  it  a  less  obvious 
but  a  far  more  important  advantage.  The  Uni- 
versity and  the  Colleges  are  national  institu- 
tions. On  more  than  one  occasion  they  have  been 
subjected  to  the  investigation  of  a  Parliamentary 
Commission.  In  view  of  any  possible  legislation 
in  the  future,  it  can  be  of  no  small  service  to  them 
to  have  drawn  to  themselves  the  attachment  of 
classes  of  great  political  importance  in  the  country. 
We  can  testify  from  our  personal  experience  to  the 
fact  that  in  several  districts  a  spirit  of  distrust  and 
even  of  hostility  is  giving  way  to  a  new  sentiment 
of  affectionate  regard. 


112  HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTURE? 


3»  THE  STATE. 

The  third  source  of  possible  means  is  to  be  found 
in  the  State.  The  time  is  now  past  when  it  was 
necessary  to  go  to  the  root  of  matters,  and  as  a 
preliminary  to  any  application  for  State  aid,  to 
discuss  the  whole  question  of  the  wisdom  of  State 
interference. 

So  far  at  any  rate  as  education  is  concerned,  the 
principle  has  been  granted  many  times  over.  As 
Professor  Jowett  has  pointed  out,  '  very  nearly 
every  civilised  country  in  the  world,  France, 
Germany,  Switzerland  and  the  United  States  of 
America,  already  provides  education  both  primary 
and  secondary,  either  free  of  cost,  or  at  a  very 
trifling  cost,  for  all  its  citizens  V  It  is  no  leap  in 
the  dark  which  is  proposed  even  as  regards  our 
own  country.  Parliament  not  only  votes  three 
millions  a  year  to  the  elementary  schools,  but  it 
assigns  annually  large  sums  to  higher  education. 
The  Science  and  Art  Department  receives  nearly 
half-a-million,  the  Training  Colleges  for  Elementary 
Teachers  more  than  £100,000,  the  London  Univer- 
sity nearly  £15,000,  the  Local  Colleges  of  England 
£15,000  more,  and  there  are  grants  besides  to  the 
Colleges  and  Universities  of  Wales,  Scotland  and 
Ireland.  Any  further  employment  of  Government 
resources  for  purposes  of  education  may  be  dis- 

1  Report  of  Oxford  University  Extension  Conference,  1887,  p.  97, 


HAS    EXTENSION    A   FUTUBE  ?  113 

cussed,  therefore,  on   grounds   of  justice   and  ex- 
pediency rather  than  principle. 

THE  JUSTICE  OF  STATE  AID  TO  UNIVERSITY 
EDUCATION. 

Let  us  enquire,  first,  whether  the  people  whom 
University  Extension  serves  and  whom,  were  the 
necessary  means  forthcoming,  it  would  serve  to  a 
vastly  greater  extent  than  at  present,  have  any 
claim  on  the  ground  of  justice  to  the  help  of  the 
State.  If  we  examine  the  institutions  which  at 
present  participate  in  the  grants  for  higher  educa- 
tional purposes,  we  shall  find  that  the  London 
University  is  a  purely  examining  body,  the  Training 
Colleges  are  open  only  to  candidates  for  one  par- 
ticular calling,  the  Science  and  Art  Department 
teaches  only  certain  subjects,  and,  to  a  large  ex- 
tent, it  teaches  those,  either  directly  or  indirectly,  for 
industrial  purposes.  The  local  colleges,  on  the  other 
hand,  receive  help  that  they  may  better  '  discharge 
the  duties  which  the  title  "  University  College  " 
implies1 ;'  that  is,  that  they  may  give  above  all  things 
a  higher  general  education.  They  discharge  these 
duties  to  a  great  extent  by  holding  evening  classes. 
Both  as  regards  the  social  position  of  the  students, 
and  the  nature  of  instruction  given,  these  evening 
classes — not  to  mention  many  of  those  held  in  the 
daytime — are  almost  precisely  similar  in  character 

1  See  Appendix  II. 
I 


114  HAS    EXTENSION    A    FUTURE? 

to  those  of  the  University  Extension  System.  As 
we  have  seen,  the  local  colleges  come  from  the  same 
general  movement  which  has  given  birth  to  the 
Extension1.  The  Nottingham  College,  indeed,  grew 
directly  out  of  the  Extension  Lectures  which  pre- 
ceded it.  We  have  already  referred  to  the  fact  that 
not  a  little  of  the  local  college  teaching  is  still  done 
by  Extension  Lecturers.  A  number  also  of  the 
Professors  have  been  trained  on  the  Extension.  But 
the  local  college  is  a  development  of  Extension 
teaching  only  possible  in  very  large  towns.  With- 
out the  Treasury  grant,  it  is  more  than  doubtful 
whether  places  as  large  as  Sheffield,  Nottingham 
and  Bristol  could  have  continued  the  costly  luxury 
of  an  independent  professoriate.  Including  the 
Victoria  University  and  the  two  great  Metropolitan 
Colleges,  there  are  in  all  England  and  Wales  only 
thirteen  such  institutions,  and  by  the  census  of 
1 88 1  there  were  303  towns  of  more  than  10,000 
inhabitants.  It  is  impossible  for  the  great  majority 
of  even  earnest  and  self-denying  students  to  attend 
at  any  college.  The  great  area  covered  by  our 
chief  cities  often  renders  it  difficult  for  those  who 
live  no  further  away  than  the  suburbs,  to  make  use 
of  the  city  college.  The  teaching  must  be  taken 
to  the  people  where  the  people  cannot  come  to  the 
teaching.  The  local  college  is  the  form  taken  by 
the  Extension  System  under  peculiarly  favourable 
circumstances.  The  whole  body  of  taxpayers  con- 
1  P.  73- 


HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTUKE  ?  115 

tribute  to  its  maintenance,  but  only  a  very  small 
percentage  can  make  any  use  of  it.  The  remainder 
of  the  Extension  System  works  in  the  face  of  very 
great  difficulties,  but  it  reaches  a  greater  body  of 
the  taxpayers  than  the  fixed  colleges.  Is  not  the 
small  town  entitled  in  justice  to  something  in 
return  for  its  taxation  ?  There  is,  too,  another  view 
of  the  subject.  The  advantages  which  great  towns 
can  secure,  the  means  of  instruction  and  amuse- 
ment which  are  the  incidental  good  of  their 
crowded  character,  are  one  of  the  causes  which 
tend  to  the  depopulation  of  the  country  districts, 
and  to  too  great  centralisation.  Is  it  not  the  duty 
of  the  Government  in  the  highest  interests  of  the 
State,  in  the  face  of  the  unwieldy  growth  of  our 
chief  towns,  and  of  all  the  dangers  which  that  im- 
plies both  to  the  State  and  to  the  race,  to  do  what 
it  can  to  help  the  smaller  places  to  compete  in 
attraction  with  the  greater  ?  University  Extension 
is  a  University  College  by  co-operation  of  the 
smaller  towns  and  of  the  outlying  districts  of  the 
larger. 

THE  EXPEDIENCY  or  STATE  AID. 

Let  us  now  turn  from  the  justice  of  the  claim  to 
the  consideration  of  its  expediency  and  of  its  prac- 
ticability. There  are  admitted  dangers  in  the 
interference  of  the  State  in  matters  of  education. 
There  is  the  danger  of  centralisation.  After  a 


116  HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTURE  ? 

century  of  centralisation  France  is  now  com- 
pelled to  reverse  her  University  policy.  The  one 
State  University,  managed  from  Paris,  is  about  to 
give  way  to  the  revived  independence  of  the  Local 
Faculties.  That,  at  any  rate,  is  generally  believed 
to  be  the  meaning  of  the  ministerial  statements  at 
the  recent  celebration  at  Montpellier.  Any  scheme 
for  State  assistance  of  University  Extension  must 
guard  against  the  danger  of  centralisation. 

Another  danger  lies  in  the  stereotyping  of  the 
present  machinery.  The  Educational  problem  is 
always  with  us.  It  consists  in  the  adapting  of  a 
great  system,  with  many  vested  interests  and  deep 
ruts  of  routine,  to  the  new  wants  of  the  present. 
Elasticity  is  one  of  the  prime  necessities  of  any 
educational  system  which  is  not  ultimately  to  do 
more  harm  than  good.  We  must  preserve  to  Uni- 
versity Extension  as  much  as  possible  of  its  present 
admirable  elasticity  of  organization. 

We  do  not  ask  that  the  State  should  take  over 
and  maintain  wholly  any  of  the  schemes  for  higher 
education.  We  must  therefore  be  careful  that 
national  assistance  is  so  given  that  it  will  not 
remove  the  stimulus  to  local  exertion,  and  will  not 
stop  the  flow  of  private  munificence. 

THE  PRACTICABILITY  OF  STATE  AID. 

From  the  point  of  view  of  practicability  we  have 
two  great  objections  to  meet.  The  first  is  that  the 


HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTURE  ?  117 

Extension  centres  have  no  permanent  organization. 
They  consist  of  committees  and  secretaries  giving 
voluntary  service,  and  are  at  any  time  liable  to 
perish.  They  have  no  endowments,  no  salaried 
officers,  no  buildings,  nothing  in  fact  that  guarantees 
continuance,  and  nobody  to  be  made  responsible 
for  the  right  spending  of  the  national  funds.  We 
admit  the  difficulty.  We  recognise  that  any  de- 
tailed scheme  must  deal  with  it  if  it  is  to  have 
a  chance  of  success.  But  we  point  out  that  it  is 
futile  to  ask  small  and  often  poor  places  to  make 
a  great  effort,  unless  they  have  some  security  that 
the  effort,  once  made,  will  not  be  left  to  die  away 
during  years  of  fruitless  agitation.  First  state  the 
terms  on  which  help  will  be  given,  and  if  they 
are  at  all  possible  you  may  be  sure  that  the 
centres  will  soon  comply  with  them.  England 
was  not  covered  with  Science  and  Art  teaching 
before  the  Department  had  stated  the  terms  on 
which  it  would  recognise  it.  Extension,  on  the 
other  hand,  does  exist.  It  is  maintained  from  year 
to  year  on  precarious  subscriptions,  which  are  given 
with  the  idea  that  a  permanent  organization  will 
soon  be  won.  Why  wait  till  the  enthusiasm  of  the 
subscribers  is  exhausted?  Why  not  meet  them 
half-way,  and  encourage  them  to  make  still  greater 
efforts  ? 

The  other  objection  is  based  on  the  number 
and  varied  character  of  the  centres.  The  task  of 
equitably  dividing  a  grant  among  them  and  of 


118  HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTURE  1 

exacting  the  needful  securities  would  be  a  very 
difficult  one.  The  administrative  and  inspecting 
apparatus  would  have  to  be  so  elaborate,  that  we 
should  be  in  danger  of  incurring  the  evils  of  cen- 
tralisation and  loss  of  elasticity  to  which  reference 
has  already  been  made.  There  is  much  truth  in 
this,  but  still  we  feel  that,  if  ingenuity  can  pos- 
sibly find  a  way  through  them,  mere  difficulties  of 
administration  ought  not  to  be  allowed  to  prevent 
the  application  of  an  admitted  principle  to  practice. 

THE  NATIONAL  COMMITTEE'S  WORK. 

Such  were  the  arguments  advanced  in  1889, 
when  the  subject  was  discussed  at  a  Conference 
of  local  secretaries  and  others  present  at  the  Oxford 
Summer  Meeting.  No  one  contested  the  justice  of 
the  claim,  nor,  so  far  as  we  can  learn,  has  it  been 
contested  since  in  circles  less  favourably  inclined. 
There  were  the  dangers  of  centralisation,  of  loss  of 
elasticity,  of  loss  of  self-help  and  of  pauperisation. 
There  were  the  difficulties  involved  in  the  tentative 
organization  of  the  centres  and  in  their  number  and 
variety.  Could  the  difficulties  and  dangers  be  got 
over  ?  A  small  Committee  was  appointed  to  make  a 
preliminary  investigation.  It  reported  as  follows  : — 

1  Parliament  has  recently  granted  a  sum  of  fifteen 
thousand  per  annum  to  the  local  colleges  of 
England.  These  colleges  are  situated  in  a  few  of 
the  great  centres  of  population.  The  result  is  that 


HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTURE?  119 

inhabitants  of  smaller  places,  while  contributing  to 
this  sum,  receive  little  advantage  from  it.  The 
University  Extension  System  is  practically  the 
local  college  of  the  smaller  places.  Upwards  of 
thirty  thousand  students  availed  themselves  of  the 
advantages  which  it  offered  during  the  past  year. 
This  result  has  been  attained  at  an  average  total 
cost  of  about  ten  shillings  per  student.  The  system 
is  approved  by  the  experience  of  seventeen  years. 
It  is  capable  of  great  development,  and  the  time 
has  come  when  it  should  be  placed  on  a  permanent 
footing. 

6  The  State  is  spending  upwards  of  three  millions 
a  year  on  elementary  education.  Five  thousand  a 
year  granted  to  the  Extension  movement  would 
greatly  increase  the  benefits  derived  by  the  nation 
from  that  immense  outlay.  It  is  proposed  that  an 
application  should  be  made  to  Parliament  for  some 
such  grant. 

'  The  method  employed  in  the  distribution  of  the 
money  among  the  centres  might  be  that  at  present 
in  force  in  the  case  of  the  local  colleges.  The  grant 
would  be  entrusted  to  a  central  committee  ap- 
pointed by  Government,  and  would  be  by  them 
distributed  amongst  the  local  centres.  The  amount 
allotted  to  each  would  probably  depend  on  such 
considerations  as  the  following  : — The  nature  of  the 
population  of  the  district,  the  amount  of  local 
subscriptions,  the  number  of  students,  and  the 
character  and  excellence  of  the  work  done.' 


120  HAS. EXTENSION   A   FUTURE? 

The  idea  of  a  system  of  capitation  grants  similar 
to  those  of  the  Science  and  Art  Department  had 
been  discussed.  It  was  rejected  on  the  grounds 
that  it  necessarily  involved  stringent  and  detailed 
state  regulations  in  the  matter  of  subjects,  exami- 
nation and  inspection.  It  implied  in  short  the 
dangers  of  centralisation  and  stereotyping.  It 
will  be  noticed  that  the  committee  finally  inclined 
to  a  system  similar  to  that  at  present  in  force 
in  the  case  of  the  local  colleges.  This  report 
was  adopted  at  a  subsequent  sitting  of  the  confer- 
ence. A  larger  committee  was  appointed,  with 
power  to  add  to  its  number,  and  this  is  the  existing 
'  National  Committee  for  obtaining  a  Grant  in  aid 
of  University  Extension.'  It  is  composed  of  nine 
representatives  from  Oxford  centres,  and  seven  from 
Cambridge  centres.  The  joint  hon.  sees,  are  Miss 
Snowden,  of  Ilkley,  Yorkshire,  and  Mr.  H.  Macan,  of 
Exeter.  The  chief  work  undertaken  as  yet  has  been 
the  formation  of  opinion  among  those  interested  in 
Extension  work,  and  among  members  of  Parliament 
and  others  of  influential  position  in  politics. 

THE  TREASURY  GRANT  SCHEME. 

The  committee  is  not  yet  pledged  to  any  definite 
scheme,  though  the  plan  indicated  in  the  prelimi- 
nary report  has  so  far  seemed  the  best l.  The 
founding  of  several  new  district  federations  of 

1  For  details  of  the  plan  see  Report  on  pp.  1 18-1 20  and  Appendix  II. 


HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTURE  ?  121 

centres  since  the  report  was  written,  seems  to  fore- 
shadow a  general  grouping  of  the  centres,  which 
would  no  doubt  do  much  to  simplify  the  distribu- 
tion of  a  grant. 

THE  COUNTY  COUNCIL  SCHEME. 

As  a  result  of  Mr.  Goschen's  statement  in  the 
House  of  Commons,  an  alternative  scheme  has 
suggested  itself  to  the  writers,  which  seems  to  them 
to  obviate  many  of  the  difficulties  involved  in  all 
the  plans  as  yet  put  forward.  Mr.  Goschen  pro- 
poses *  to  add  the  amount  set  free  by  the  abandon- 
ment of  the  licensing  clauses  to  the  residue  which 
under  the  Bill  as  it  stands  goes  to  the  County 
Councils,  accompanying  this  inclusion  by  an  in- 
timation that  possibly  new  charges  may  by  and  by 
be  put  upon  them  in  reference  to  intermediate, 
technical,  and  agricultural  education.  It  seems 
desirable,  if  more  is  to  be  done  in  this  respect,  that 
the  localities,  especially  County  Councils,  should  be 
interested  in  the  work1.'  Let  us  analyse  this  state- 
ment and  see  what  it  means.  A  sum  of  money  has 
been  raised  by  taxation.  It  is  proposed  to  assign 
it  to  the  County  Councils.  It  is  further  proposed 
to  couple  it  with  an  intimation  that  it  may  have 
to  be  applied  to  education.  There  is  an  indication, 
too,  that  it  is  the  County  Councils  who  will  be 
asked  to  take  in  hand  the  application  of  the  money 
to  education.  We  may  presume  that  the  Bill  which 

1  See  Appendix  I. 


122  HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTURE? 

it  is  probably  intended  to  introduce  will  follow  the 
precedents  of  the  Welsh  Intermediate  Education 
Act,  1889.  This  authorises  the  Welsh  County 
Councils  to  spend  certain  limited  sums  of  money 
on  education  which  is  neither  elementary  nor  tech- 
nical. What  proposal  can  be  simpler,  than  that  in 
the  permissive  Act  which  will  probably  be  passed, 
the  County  Councils  of  England  shall  be  authorised, 
under  the  head  of  Intermediate  Education,  to  assist 
among  other  institutions  the  University  Extension 
Centres  of  their  respective  counties'?  The  great 
advantages  of  the  proposal  are  that  it  minimises 
both  the  dangers  and  the  difficulties  which  attend 
any  scheme  for  state  aid  to  University  Extension. 
The  Universities  would  not  be  hampered  by  depart- 
mental regulations.  They  would  be  free  to  continue 
experiments  and  to  strike  out  new  lines  in  the 
work.  Their  healthy  rivalry  would  continue  to 
prompt  originality  of  organization.  The  County 
Councils,  on  the  other  hand,  would  be  free  to 
discuss  the  rival  schemes  and  methods,  and  to 
adopt  which  they  pleased.  There  would  thus  be 
no  danger  of  monotonous  similarity  in  the  work  of 
neighbouring  counties.  Variety  in  itself,  it  must 
be  remembered,  is  the  key  to  lasting  progress  ;  it 
is  essential  also  to  the  supplying  of  the  wants  of 
differing  localities. 

The  difficulties  of  distribution  would  be  reduced 
to  very  small  proportions.  The  Educational  Com- 
mittees of  the  Councils  would  know  personally  the 


HAS    EXTENSION    A    FUTURE  ?  123 

various  centres  in  their  respective  counties.  They 
would  be  in  a  position  to  estimate  their  work,  their 
wants,  and  their  success  or  failure.  Since  the  Act 
would  contain  only  permission  to  make  grants,  the 
local  leaders  of  Extension  would  receive  the  great 
stimulus  of  having  both  to  better  their  organization, 
in  order  to  bring  effective  pressure  to  bear  on  the 
Councils  to  induce  them  to  apply  the  Act,  and  also 
to  improve  the  teaching  for  the  purpose  of  con- 
vincing the  Councils  that  they  were  worthy  of 
assistance.  An  incidental  effect  of  County  Council 
management  would  not  improbably  be  to  pro- 
mote private  munificence.  In  the  case  of  public 
libraries  it  not  unfrequently  happens  that  a 
wealthy  individual  presents  the  building  and  the 
books,  provided  the  town  adopts  the  Act  for  their 
maintenance.  In  the  case  of  "University  Extension, 
such  a  benefactor  might  give  a  small  building  with 
class-rooms  and  offices,  on  condition  that  the  County 
granted  assistance  towards  the  annual  expenses. 

THE  POSSIBILITIES  OP  UNIVERSITY  EXTENSION. 

We  believe  that  the  effect  of  the  adoption  of  our 
plan  would  be  that  in  a  few  years  most  towns  of 
5000  inhabitants  or  more  would  have  a  centre  of 
University  teaching ;  that  the  larger  towns  would 
have  small  buildings  by  the  side  of  their  public 
libraries,  in  which  several  concurrent  courses  of 
teaching  on  different  subjects  would  be  carried  on ; 


124  HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTURE  5 

that  the  centres  of  each  county  would  form  a  feder- 
ation, and  that  the  representatives  of  this  feder- 
ation, so  far  as  they  were  not  actually  County 
Councillors  themselves,  would  be  consulted  by  the 
Educational  Committee  of  the  Council.  If  a  local 
college  existed  in  the  county,  it  would  be  used  by 
the  more  advanced  students,  in  subjects  especially 
which  require  the  help  of  museums  and  laboratories. 
The  Universities  would  continue  to  supply  most  of 
the  lecturers,  they  would  certify  to  their  compe- 
tence, and  test  their  work  by  examination.  Every 
summer  large  gatherings  would  spend  from  one  to 
three  months  in  the  chosen  seats  of  learning.  They 
would  serve  to  keep  the  centres  in  touch  with 
University  life  and  with  the  newest  ideas  on 
organization.  In  part  they  would  consist  of  stu- 
dents of  larger  means,  in  part  of  the  intellectual 
pick  of  the  working  classes,  brought  together  by  a 
system  of  small  scholarships.  This  ideal  may  seem 
ambitious,  but  on  a  small  scale  its  elements  exist, 
and  it  requires  but  a  little  to  bind  them  together. 
The  rest  would  be  a  matter  of  rapid  and  natural 
growth. 

One  point  by  the  way.  In  view  of  the  fact  that 
the  counties  are  likely  soon  to  be  units  in  educa- 
tional matters,  would  it  not  be  well  henceforth  to 
form  County  Federations  of  centres  rather  than 
federations,  like  the  existing  Northern,  South- 
Eastern,  and  South-Western  Associations,  of  three 
or  four  counties  ?  Even  for  the  administrative 


HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTURE  ?  125 

purpose  of  organizing  circuits  for  the  lecturers  we 
incline  to  think  the  present  federations  too  large. 


SUMMAEY    AND    CONCLUSION. 

Let  us  finally  summarise  the  whole  case.  Tech- 
nical education  is  required  for  trade,  higher  general 
education  for  life.  Elementary  education  has  made 
higher  general  education  possible :  it  has  also  made 
it  necessary.  It  is  necessary  both  for  the  avoiding 
of  dangers  and  for  the  securing  of  benefits.  The 
dangers  are  chiefly  two.  The  power  of  reading 
gives  new  opportunities  for  indulging  directly  in 
evil ;  it  presents  also  a  new  temptation  to  dissipate 
mental  energy.  These  are  the  special  dangers  of  a 
little  education.  Higher  education  obviates  them 
by  introducing  new  benefits.  It  gives  intellectual 
interest  to  life ;  it  conduces  to  sobriety  of  political 
judgment;  the  study  of  national  literature  and 
national  history  inspires  patriotism.  In  short,  by 
giving  contact  with  the  greatest  thoughts  of  the 
world,  such  training  imparts  higher  ideals  of  life, 
of  citizenship,  and  of  religion. 

Libraries  alone  will  not  do.  In  themselves 
they  afford  no  living  guide ;  alone  they  present  no 
standard  of  attainments.  Personal  teaching  must 
be  added.  Living  mind  must  touch  living  mind. 
And  we  need  for  such  a  work  the  most  highly 
trained  teachers. 


126  HAS    EXTENSION    A   FUTURE  ? 

The  teacher  may  be  stationary  or  itinerant.  The 
leisured .  can  come  to  the  teacher,  but  the  teacher 
must  go  to  the  busy.  The  latter  are  the  vast 
majority.  The  Universities  can  afford  great  staffs  ; 
a  few  local  colleges  can  afford  adequate  equipment, 
but  the  great  majority  of  towns  must  depend  on 
the  itinerant  teacher.  And  among  such  places  must 
be  included  the  outlying  or  neglected  districts  even 
of  the  large  towns  which  have  local  colleges. 

This  body  of  itinerant  teachers  already  consti- 
tutes a  university  by  co-operation  of  towns.  Rail- 
ways and  the  modern  massing  of  populations  make 
such  a  system  possible. 

Such  a  body  of  teachers  is  best  selected,  trained, 
and  supervised  by  the  Universities.  They  alone 
have  the  endowments  necessary  to  draw  to  them 
from  all  the  country  the  young  minds  of  great 
ability.  They  alone  have  the  traditions  which 
inspire  to  the  attainment  of  the  highest  culture. 
They  have  the  historic  prestige  which  marks  them 
out  to  lead. 

This  is  the  system  of  University  Extension.  It 
is  a  system  which  already  exists.  It  is  a  system 
not  of  yesterday.  Our  historical  inquiry  has  shown 
how  natural  has  been  its  development,  and  that  it 
has  been  tested  and  improved  at  every  stage  by 
experience.  But  it  is  a  system  which  lacks  com- 
pleteness. Its  teaching  is  too  intermittent,  and  is 
wanting  in  sequence.  It  has  hitherto  failed  to 
retain  the  permanent  services  of  experienced  men. 


HAS    EXTENSION   A    FUTURE  ?  127 

It  has  not  reached  the  villages,  the  smallest  towns, 
or,  in  adequate  numbers,  the  poorer  classes. 

Its  difficulty  is  want  of  money.  If  the  question 
be  asked, '  Why  is  it  not  self-supporting?'  the  reply 
is  that  the  poor  can  nowhere  support  it  wholly. 
In  small  towns  the  students  of  all  classes  are  too 
few  for  the  purpose.  Further,  the  public  impres- 
sion of  the  cost  of  maintaining  higher  teachers  has 
been  largely  vitiated  by  the  fact,  that  most  persons 
engaged  in  higher  teaching  are  partly  paid  by  en- 
dowments. 

What  are  the  possible  sources  whence  money  may 
be  drawn?  They  are  three — private  munificence, 
the  Universities,  the  State.  It  would  be  best  to 
draw  on  all  three.  We  hope  for  munificence,  but 
as  yet  it  has  not  been  forthcoming  on  an  adequate 
scale.  The  public  need  is  urgent  and  we  cannot  wait 
for  it.  The  Universities  do  something  already,  but 
there  are  heavy  and  established  claims  on  their  re- 
sources. They  may  do  more,  but  can  never  bear  the 
whole  expense.  We  turn,  therefore,  to  the  State. 

We  claim  that  it  is  expedient  for  the  whole  com- 
munity that  the  State  should  give  the  aid  asked  for. 
It  is  to  the  ultimate  interest  of  every  member  of 
the  community  that  all  the  citizens  should  be  intel- 
ligent. In  the  competition  of  nations,  England  can- 
not afford  to  waste  talent.  Most  civilised  countries, 
France,  Germany,  Switzerland,  the  United  States, 
largely  assist  higher  education  out  of  govern- 
ment funds.  Moreover,  even  England  is  no  excep- 


128  HAS    EXTENSION   A   FUTURE  ? 

tion  to  this  rule.  Our  Government  already  helps 
higher  education.  Why  should  University  Exten- 
sion be  left  out  ? 

There  are  obvious  dangers  in  State-aid.  There 
is  the  danger  of  losing  elasticity  in  organization,  of 
stereotyping  the  methods  of  teaching,  of  the  in- 
action which  frequently  follows  on  officialism,  of 
pauperisation.  A  scheme  must  be  devised  which 
avoids  these  dangers. 

There  are  two  ways  in  which  State-aid  can  be 
given.  It  can  be  given  centrally  and  it  can  be  given 
locally.  If  given  centrally,  University  Extension 
would  be  placed  on  the  same  footing  as  the  local 
colleges  which  receive  Parliamentary  grants.  It  is 
entitled  to  the  same  treatment  as  those  colleges ; 
it  has  the  same  origin  ;  it  is  worked  by  the  same 
kind  of  men,  and  often  by  the  same  men  ;  to  a  great 
extent  the  work  of  the  local  college  is  Extension 
work ;  above  all,  every  taxpayer  contributes  to  the 
Parliamentary  grant,  but  only  the  few  who  live 
near  to  the  college  participate  in  it. 

But  State  aid  can  also  be  given  locally.  It 
might  be  given  by  the  County  Councils  out  of  the 
new  funds  which  it  is  proposed  to  hand  over  to 
them.  On  the  precedent  of  the  Public  Libraries' 
Act,  recognition  of  University  Extension  might  be 
left  to  the  discretion  of  the  Councils. 

We  prefer  the  second  plan.  It  obviates  the 
worst  dangers  of  centralisation  and  officialism.  It 
surmounts  the  practical  difficulties  of  distribution 


HAS   EXTENSION   A   FUTURE  ?  129 

and  inspection.  It  has,  moreover,  several  distinct 
advantages  of  its  own.  The  administrators  of  the 
fund  would  have  personal  knowledge  of  the  centres. 
The  local  leaders  of  University  Extension,  them- 
selves often  county  councillors,  would  be  able  in 
person  to  urge  its  claims.  But,  since  the  Act  would 
only  be  permissive,  they  would  have  to  bestir  them- 
selves to  get  it  adopted.  Extension  centres  would 
be  put  on  their  mettle.  Their  energy  would  arouse 
local  interest,  and  the  flow  of  private  munificence 
might  be  increased.  The  scheme,  moreover,  would 
leave  the  Universities  free  to  initiate  and  to  experi- 
ment, while  the  local  bodies  would  be  as  free  to  adopt 
whatever  plan  commended  itself  to  them  as  the  best. 

Our  proposal  seems  practicable.  The  elements 
of  the  new  machinery  already  exist.  The  centres 
exist ;  the  Universities  have  organized  the  system  ; 
the  County  Councils  are  formed;  the  necessary 
funds  are  already  forthcoming  from  the  new  Spirit 
Duty  ;  these  funds  it  is  already  proposed  to  assign 
to  the  County  Councils  ;  they  have  even  been  desig- 
nated for  educational  purposes.  Nothing  is  wanting 
but  a  clause  in  an  Act  of  Parliament  permitting  their 
partial  application  to  University  Extension  work. 

We  ask  that,  when  the  educational  institutions, 
to  which  the  County  Councils  may  vote  grants  in 
aid,  come  to  be  enumerated  in  an  Act  of  Parlia- 
ment, a  prominent  place  may  be  given  to  University 
Extension. 


APPENDIX. 


I. — THE  APPLICATION  OF  THE  EXTRA  SPIRIT  DUTY. 

Statement  ~by  the  Chancellor  of  the  Exchequer  in  the  House  of 
Commons,  July  21,  1890. 

Mr.  VINCENT  asked  the  Chancellor  of  the  Exchequer  if 
Her  Majesty's  Government  had  yet  determined  upon  their 
recommendation  as  to  the  application  of  the  extra  taxation 
upon  spirits  approved  by  the  House  in  the  belief  that  it 
would  be  utilised  for  the  benefit  of  the  contributors. 

The  CHANCELLOR  of  the  EXCHEQUER:  With  regard  to 
the  question  of  my  hon.  and  gallant  friend,  some  misappre- 
hension might  be  conveyed  by  the  wording  of  the  question. 
The  word  *  contributor '  itself  is  one  that  might  be  open  to 
controversy,  because  it  is  uncertain  whether  the  contributor 
would  be  held  to  be  the  distiller,  the  brewer,  the  retailer,  or 
the  consumer.  But,  passing  that  point,  the  extra  taxation 
on  spirits  and  beer  was  not  approved  by  the  House  of  Com- 
mons in  the  belief  that  the  whole  of  the  amount  would  be 
utilised  for  the  benefit  of  the  contributors.  The  proposal 
before  it  is  that  one-third  should  be  so  used,  namely  £440,000 
out  of  £1,304,000.  If  my  hon.  and  gallant  friend's  question 
is  intended  to  suggest  that  that  purpose  has  failed  and  that 
the  tax  should  be  repealed,  the  suggestion  would  only  take 
us  to  a  repeal  of  one-third  of  the  tax,  namely  2d.  on  spirits 
and  id.  on  beer.  Such  a  fractional  repeal  would,  I  am  given 
to  understand,  be  unpalatable  even  to  those  interested  in  the 
tax.  It  would  disturb  arrangements,  contracts,  price  lists, 
&c.,  without  affording  any  appreciable  relief.  We  therefore 
discard  that  solution  of  the  question.  Further,  we  shall 
abide  by  the  principle  of  this  extra  tax,  that  it  shall  be 
devoted  to  local  purposes  spread  over  the  whole  country. 
This  precludes  the  adoption  of  such  a  suggestion  as  that 
contained  in  the  question  of  the  hon.  member  for  Camborne 
(Mr.  Conybeare)  to  the  First  Lord  of  the  Treasury,  namely 
that  a  large  portion  of  the  money  should  be  devoted  to  pur- 
chasing the  Crystal  Palace  for  the  people. 


APPENDIX.  131 

I  will  now  state  what  we  propose  as  regards  England, 
Scotland,  and  Ireland  respectively.  When  I  speak  of  Ire- 
land I  am  dealing  with  the  first  £40,000,  and  not  with  the 
second  £40,000  set  free  by  the  Exchequer  contribution.  As 
regards  England,  we  propose  to  add  the  amount  set  free  by 
the  abandonment  of  the  licensing  clauses  to  the  residue 
which,  under  the  bill  as  it  stands,  goes  to  the  County  Coun- 
cils, accompanying  this  inclusion  by  an  intimation  that 
possibly  new  charges  may  by-and-by  be  put  upon  them  in 
reference  to  intermediate,  technical,  and  agricultural  edu- 
cation. It  seems  to  be  desirable,  if  more  is  to  be  done  in 
this  respect,  that  the  localities,  especially  County  Councils, 
should  be  interested  in  the  work.  In  England  at  the  pre- 
sent moment  there  is  little  machinery  suitable  for  carrying 
on  such  an  object,  and  it  would  be  impossible  to  create  such 
a  machinery  at  this  period  of  the  session.  But  in  Wales 
and  Monmouthshire  the  machinery  does  exist.  The  County 
Councils  there  may  supply  funds  under  the  Intermediate 
Education  Act  of  last  year  out  of  the  county  rate,  but  to  the 
extent  of  one  halfpenny  of  such  rate  only.  We  shall  pro- 
pose that  County  Councils  in  Wales  should  have  authority 
to  increase  that  sum  out  of  the  additional  funds  placed  at 
their  disposal.  As  regards  the  £50,000  which  falls  to  the 
share  of  Scotland,  we  propose  that  the  amount  set  fre<e 
should  go  to  the  County  Councils.  The  House  will  bear  in 
mind  that  while  in  England  and  Ireland  much  has  been 
done  for  the  ratepayers,  so  far  as  Scotland  is  concerned  the 
ratepayers  have  scarcely  had  any  advantage  whatever  out  of 
the  revision  of  local  taxation,  and  it  seems  but  just  that  their 
case  should  also  receive  some  consideration.  As  regards  Ire- 
land— I  am  speaking  now  of  this  particular  £40,000 — we  shall 
propose  that  the  £40,000  which  falls  to  her  share  shall  be 
utilised  for  the  further  promotion  of  intermediate  educa- 
tion, and  for  this  purpose  shall  be  placed  at  the  disposal  of 
the  Intermediate  Education  Board  for  Ireland,  a  body  which, 
I  believe,  commands  the  confidence  of  the  Irish  public  gene- 
rally, irrespective  of  political  or  religious  feelings. 

Mr.  VINCENT  asked  whether  the  right  hon.  gentleman 
would  consider  the  remission  of  this  extra  taxation  in  his 
next  year's  Budget 

Mr.  BUCHANAN  asked  whether  the  same  reservation  ap- 
plied to  Scotland  as  to  England. 

The  CHANCELLOR  of  the  EXCHEQUER  :  No,  sir,  there  is 
no  such  reservation. 


132  APPENDIX. 

Mr.  BUCHANAN  :  Will  it  simply  become  a  part  of  the 
residue  under  the  bill  ? 

The  CHANCELLOR  of  the  EXCHEQUER  :  Yes. 

Mr.  SEXTON  asked  the  Chancellor  of  the  Exchequer  to  what 
purposes  the  Government  proposed  to  appropriate  the  sum 
of  £40,000  allotted  to  Ireland  as  the  Exchequer  contribution 
in  respect  of  local  taxation  licences,  and  the  sum  of  £40,000, 
the  unallotted  portion  of  the  Irish  share  of  the  new  beer  and 
spirits  duties. 

The  CHANCELLOR  of  the  EXCHEQUER  said  :  The  £40,000 
allotted  to  Ireland  is  a  set-off  against  the  gain  derived  by 
England  and  Scotland  from  the  excess  of  the  sums  received  for 
licences  over  the  grant  contributed.  We  propose  a  grant  to 
assist  the  Irish  local  authorities  who  have  taken  or  may  take 
action  under  the  Irish  Labourers'  Dwellings  Act,  1882  and 
1885. 

Mr.  A.  ACLAND  asked  whether  the  English  County  Councils 
were  to  be  allowed  to  use  the  money  for  intermediate  and 
technical  education,  or  whether  the  Government  only  ex- 
pressed a  pious  opinion  that  some  day  they  might  have  to  do 
so,  and  whether,  with  reference  to  Wales,  the  County  Coun- 
cils there  were  to  be  directed  to  help  the  intermediate 
education  now  in  existence,  or  whether  they  were  only  to  do 
so  if  they  chose  to  pass  a  vote  to  that  effect. 

Mr.  W.  P.  SINCLAIR  asked,  with  reference  to  the  Scottish 
£50,000,  would  it  be  competent  for  County  Councils  to  devote 
that  sum  or  any  part  of  it  for  the  purpose  of  education. 

The  CHANCELLOR  of  the  EXCHEQUER  :  No,  sir,  I  presume 
it  would  not  be  possible  for  them  to  devote  any  portion  of  the 
sum  to  purposes  to  which  at  present  by  law  they  could  not 
apply  it.  I  am  aware  of  the  desire  of  a  good  many  Scottish 
members  that  this  money  should  be  devoted  to  setting 
education  entirely  free.  That  would  have  to  be  done  by 
legislation,  and  we  do  not  propose  to  legislate  on  that 
matter.  With  regard  to  the  question  of  the  hon.  member 
for  Rotherham  (Mr.  A.  Acland),  I  have  explained  that  we 
have  no  machinery  and  that  it  would  be  impossible  at  this 
period  of  the  session  to  set  up  machinery  for  the  purpose. 
The  money  will  be  placed  at  the  disposal  of  the  English 
County  Councils,  but  intimation  will  be  given  to  them  which 
might  guide  them  so  as  not  to  spend  it  in  a  manner  which 
would  seem  to  stereotype  in  any  way  that  payment  to  them, 
and  it  will  also  be  pointed  out  to  them  that  possibly  charges 
might  bo  put  upon  them  in  the  future  in  regard  to  inter- 


APPENDIX.  133 

mediate  education.  It  will  be  rather  a  warning  to  them  not 
to  employ  the  money  in  a  manner  which  would  imply  the 
permanency  of  the  payment. 

Mr.  A.  ACLAND  :  About  Wales  ? 

The  CHANCELLOR  of  the  EXCHEQUER:  They  would  not 
be  directed ;  they  would  have  authority  to  do  so.  I  would 
ask  hon.  members  not  to  ask  further  questions  until  they 
see  our  proposals  embodied  in  clauses,  as  in  answering  in 
this  way  across  the  table  I  might  be  guilty  of  some  slip 
which  might  lead  to  future  complications. 

Mr.  CAMPBELL-BANNERMAN  intimated  that  at  the  proper 
time  he  should  move  that  the  £50,000  appropriated  to  Scot- 
land out  of  the  new  customs  tax  be  devoted  not  to  relieving 
local  taxation  but  to  the  direct  freeing  of  primary  education 
in  Scotland. 


II. — TEEMS  or  TREASURY  GRANT  TO  LOCAL  COLLEGES. 

Treasury  Minute,  1889,  staling  conditions  on  which  the  sum 
of  £15,000  would  be  distributed  among  the  University 
Colleges  of  Great  Britain. 

My  Lords  have  had  under  their  consideration  the  report 
of  the  Committee  appointed  to  advise  the  Government  with 
reference  to  the  distribution  of  the  sum  of  £15,000  which 
Parliament  is  to  be  asked  to  grant  for  '  University  Colleges 
in  Great  Britain/ 

The  Committee  state  in  their  report  that  the  sum 
assigned  by  them  to  each  college  is  made  up  of  two 
items— (a)  a  fixed  sum  to  each  college,  together  with  a 
grant  to  the  college  for  each  professor  or  head  of  a  depart- 
ment, and  (6)  a  percentage  on  the  total  amount  of  local 
subscriptions  and  students'  fees. 

My  Lords  believe  that  this  system  of  distribution  takes 
just  account  of  the  main  factors  which  should,  under 
existing  circumstances,  determine  the  share  to  be  received 
by  each  University  College  out  of  any  sum  granted  by  Par- 
liament, and  is  a  reasonable  application  of  the  general 
principles  laid  down  in  the  memorandum  of  the  Lord 
President  and  the  Chancellor  of  the  Exchequer.  They 


134  APPENDIX. 

accordingly  accept  the  allocation  of  the  grant  of  £15,000 
for  the  present  year  as  proposed  by  the  Committee,  viz. : — 

£ 

Owens  College,  Manchester 1,800 

University  College,  London ij?oo 

King's  College,  London 1,700 

Liverpool  University  College ,500 

Mason  College,  Birmingham ,400 

Yorkshire  College,  Leeds ,400 

Nottingham  University  College ,400 

Bristol  University  College ,200 

Durham  College  of  Science  (Newcastle-on-Tyne) .  ,200 

Firth  College,  Sheffield ,200 

Dundee  University  College   ........       500 

My  Lords  recognise  that  the  present  allocation  of  the 
money  is  more  or  less  experimental,  and  that  experience 
may  show  that  greater  or  less  weight  ought  to  be  attached 
to  one  or  other  of  the  various  items,  such  as  extent  of 
endowment,  amount  of  fees,  amount  of  local"  subscriptions, 
&c.,  upon  a  comparison  of  which  in  the  different  colleges 
the  Committee  have  based  their  recommendations.  In  any 
case  the  relative  claims  of  the  several  colleges  upon  the 
total  grant  will  vary  from  time  to  time,  and  the  allocation 
of  that  grant  ought  therefore  to  be  subject  to  periodical 
revision.  My  Lords1  indeed  feel  that  it  would  not  be  de- 
sirable to  alter  the  amount  of  the  subsidies  received  by  the 
different  colleges  with  such  frequency  as  to  produce  con- 
stant uncertainty  in  their  financial  outlook.  But  neither 
would  it  seem  wise  so  to  stereotype  those  subsidies  as  to 
remove  the  incentive  which  they  ought  to  afford  to  the 
spirit  of  self-help  on  the  part  of  the  colleges  and  their  sup- 
porters. My  Lords  are  of  opinion  that  adequate  regard 
would  be  had  to  both  these  considerations  if  the  distribution 
of  the  grant  of  £15,000,  should  Parliament  see  fit  to  con- 
tinue it,  were  liable  to  be  reviewed  every  five  years. 

The  above  remarks  as  to  periodical  revision  do  not,  of 
course,  apply  to  the  University  College  of  Dundee,  inas- 
much as,  in  accordance  with  the  recommendations  of  the 
Committee,  my  Lords  regard  the  grant  to  that  institution 
as  confined,  in  any  case,  to  the  present  year. 

My  Lords  approve  of  the  suggestion  of  the  Committee 
that  'a  person  representing  the  Government  should  visit 
each  college  from  time  to  time,  not  with  a  view  of  examin- 


APPENDIX.  135 

ing  the  students,  but  to  inspect  the  buildings  and  laboratories 
and  to  become  personally  acquainted  with  the  extent  of  the 
different  courses  of  study.'  The  exact  method  of  carrying  out 
this  recommendation  is,  however,  a  matter  for  future  discus- 
sion between  the  Education  Department  and  the  Treasury. 

In  addition  to  such  periodical  inspection,  which  my  Lords 
believe  will  be  welcomed  by  the  colleges,  it  would  seem 
reasonable  to  require  that  each  college,  so  long  as  it  con- 
tinues to  receive  State  assistance,  should  furnish  annually 
to  the  Education  Department  a  statement  showing  the  result 
of  the  last  academic  year's  work,  and  that  such  statement 
should  contain,  in  particular,  the  number  of  professors  and 
students  and  the  average  number  of  lectures  attended  by 
each  student,  the  state  of  the  college  finances,  distinguishing 
under  the  head  of  receipts  between  subscriptions,  interest  on 
endowments,  fees,  and  other  sources  of  revenue,  together  with 
such  other  information  as  might  supply  a  general  view  of  the 
academic  achievements  and  financial  position  of  the  college. 

The  continued  participation  of  any  particular  institution 
in  the  grant  for  '  University  Colleges  in  Great  Britain,'  must, 
of  course,  depend  upon  the  evidence  forthcoming,  in  either 
of  the  above  ways,  or  otherwise,  of  its  continuing  adequately 
to  discharge  the  duties  which  the  title  '  University  College ' 
implies.  While  my  Lords  are  of  opinion  that  a  general 
review,  and,  if  need  be,  redistribution  of  the  grant  should 
not  be  undertaken  oftener  than  once  in  five  years,  they  are 
anxious  clearly  to  establish  the  principle  that  no  college  is 
to  be  regarded  as  having  a  vested  right  to  share,  even  for  a 
limited  number  of  years,  in  the  sums  voted  by  Parliament. 
On  the  contrary,  each  college  should  be  considered  as  liable 
to  be  excluded  at  any  time  from  further  participation  in  the 
grant  if  it  should  appear  to  the  Treasury  and  the  Education 
Department  that,  owing  to  inadequacy  of  educational  equip- 
ment, to  a  great  falling  off  in  the  number  of  its  students,  or 
to  any  other  cause,  it  had  ceased  to  be  deserving  of  support 
from  the  National  Exchequer.  But,  of  course,  any  proposed 
change  in  the  distribution  of  the  grant  will  not  take  effect 
until  it  has  been  brought  to  the  notice  of  Parliament  in 
connection  with  the  estimate. 

In  conclusion,  my  Lords  desire  to  express  their  sense  of 
the  services  rendered  by  the  Committee,  to  whom  the  thanks 
of  Her  Majesty's  Government  are  due  for  their  careful  in- 
vestigation of  the  claims  of  the  several  colleges,  and  for  the 
valuable  suggestions  contained  in  their  report. 


136  ^APPENDIX 

III. — ADDKESSES  OF  T^E  CENTRAL  AUTHORITIES  FOE 
UNIVERSITY  EXTENSION  IN  ENGLAND. 

OXFORD. — The  Delegates  for  Lectures  in  large  towns,    Uni- 
versity Extension  Office,  Examination  Schools,  Oxford. 

CAMBRIDGE. — The  Syndicate  for  Local  Lectures,  Syndicate 
Buildings,  Cambridge. 

LONDON.— The  London  Society  for  the  Extension  of  University 
Teaching,  Charterhouse,  London,  E.G. 

VICTORIA. — The  Committee  for  Local  Lectures,  Owens  College, 
Manchester. 


IV. — THE  FEDERATIONS  OF  UNIVERSITY  EXTENSION 
CENTRES  IN  ENGLAND. 

(a)  The  South-Eastern  Counties  Association  for  the  Ex- 
tension of  University  Teaching. 

Hon.  Secretary. — The  Rev.  H.  E.  B.  ARNOLD,  St.  Matthew's 
Vicarage,  Oakley  Square,  London,  N.W. 

Hon.   Assistant    Secretary. — A.    RAWLINGS,   Esq.,   High 
Street,  Guildford. 

(&)  The  South-Western  Counties  Association  for  the  Ex- 
tension of  University  Teaching. 

Hon.  Secretaries. — 

H.  MAC  AN,  Esq.,  29  St.  Leonard  Road,  Exeter. 
Miss  B.  VIVIAN,  Reskadinnick,  Camborne. 

(c)  The  Yorkshire  Association  for  the  Extension  of  Uni- 
versity Teaching. 

General    Hon.    Secretary. — EDWARD    J.   WILSON,    Esq., 
6  Whitefriar  Gate,  Hull. 

Hon.   Secretary  for   Oxford    Centres. — Miss   SNOW  DON, 

Riddings  Road,  Ilkley. 

(d)  The  Northern  Association  for  the  Extension  of  Uni- 
versity Teaching. 

Hon.  Secretary. — A,  HOWSON,  Esq.,  College  of  Science,  New- 
castle-on-  Tyne. 

A  Federation  of  Centres  in  the  Potteries  is  now  in  process 
of  formation. 


SKETCH-MAPS 

SHOWING  THE  DISTRIBUTION  OF  UNIVERSITY 
EXTENSION  TEACHING  IN  ENGLAND  AND  WALES 
IN  THE  SESSIONS  1885-86  AND  1889-90.  EACH 
OF  THE  TOWNS  NAMED  CONTAINS  ONE  OR  MOEE 
EXTENSION  CENTRES. 


1.    OXFOKD  CENTRES,  SESSION  1889-90. 


2.   CAMBRIDGE  CENTRES,  SESSION  1889-90. 


Otamfcttirge  SUnibersitg 


THE     GROWTH     OP     ENGLISH    INDUSTRY     AND    COMMERCE 

DURING  THE  EARLY  AND  MIDDLE  AGES.     By  the  Rev.  W.  CUNNINGHAM, 
D.D.     Demy  8vo.    i6s. 

LECTURES    ON    MENTAL    FACULTY  :   being  Lectures  delivered  in  the 

University  of  Cambridge  during  the  Lent  Term,    1888-89,  on  the  Growth  of  Mental 
Faculty  and  Means  of  Training  it.     By  FRANCIS  WARNER,  M.D.    Crown  8vo.    4$.  6d. 

LANGUAGE   AND    LINGUISTIC  METHOD   IN   THE  SCHOOL.     By 

S.  S.  LAURIE,  M.A.,  LL.D.    Crown  8vo.    45. 

LECTURES  ON  TEACHING,  delivered  in  the  University  of  Cambridge  in 
the  Lent  Term,  1880.  By  J.  G.  FITCH,  M.A.,  LL.D.  Crown  8vo.  New  Edition.  $s. 

OCCASIONAL  ADDRESSES    ON    EDUCATIONAL    SUBJECTS.     By 

S.  S.  LAURIE,  M.A.,  LL.D.     Crown  8vo.    $s. 

PITT   PRESS   SERIES. 
VERGIL.— COMPLETE    WORKS.      With  Notes    and    Introductions,    by 

A.  SlDGWICK,  M.A. 

Vol.  I.  TEXT  and  INTRODUCTION,  y.  6d.    Vol.  II.  NOTES.    45.  6d. 

"  Mr.  Sidgwick's  Vergil  is,  we  believe,  on  the  whole,  the  best  school  edition  of  the  poet." 

Guardian. 

ANCIENT    PHILOSOPHY.      A    SKETCH    OF,   FROM    THALES    TO 

CICERO.    By  JOSEPH  B.  MAYOR,  M.A.     3s.  6d. 

ARISTOTLE,  OUTLINES  OF  THE  PHILOSOPHY  OF.  Compiled 
by  EDWIN  WALLACE,  M.A.,  LL.D.  (St.  Andrews),  late  Fellow  of  Worcester  College 
Oxford.  Third  Edition,  Enlarged.  4.?.  6d. 

JOHN  AMOS  COMENIUS.  Bishop  of  the  Moravians.  His  Life  and 
Educational  Works.  By  S.  S.  LAURIE,  A.M.,  LL.D.  New  Edition,  revised.  3$.  6d. 

THEORY   AND    PRACTICE    OF    TEACHING.     By  the  Rev.  EDWARD 

THRING,  M.  A.,  late  Head  Master  of  Uppingham  School.     New  Edition.    4$.  6d. 

THREE  LECTURES  ON  THE  PRACTICE  OF  EDUCATION.     I.  On 

Marking,  by  H.  W.EVE,  M.A.      II.   On  Stimulus,  by  A.  SIDGWICK,  M.A.      III.  On  the 
Teaching  of  Latin  Verse  Composition,  by  E.  A.  ABBOTT,  D.D.     2$. 

ON  STIMULUS.  A  Lecture  delivered  for  the  Teachers'  Training  Syndicate 
at  Cambridge,  May,  1882,  by  A.  SIDGWICK,  M.A.  is. 

MODERN    LANGUAGES,    LECTURES    ON    THE    TEACHING    OP, 

delivered  in  the  University  of  Cambridge  in  the  Lent  Term,  1887.     By  C.  COLBECK, 
M.A.     2s. 

GENERAL  AIMS  OF  THE  TEACHER,  AND  FORM  MANAGEMENT. 

Two  Lectures  delivered  in  the  University  of  Cambridge  in  the  Lent  Term,  1883,  by 
Archdeacon  FARRAR,  D.D.,  and  R.  B.  POOLE,  B.D.     is.  6d. 

MORE'S    UTOPIA.     With  Notes  by  the  Rev.  J.  R.  LUMBY,  D.D.     3*.  6a. 


LONDON  :    C.  J.   CLAY  AND  SONS, 

Cambridge  University  Press  Warehouse,  Ave  Maria  Lane. 
GLASGOW:   263  ARGYLE  STREET. 


50C 
to 


&s^s^&^^^s 


•"ale  be/or 


YB  0556! 


UNIVERSITY  OF  CALIFORNIA  LIBRARY 


56 


(Kiarcntion 


Boofes, 


SHAKESPEARE  AS  A  DRAMATIC 
ARTIST;  a  popular  Illustration  of 
the  Principles  of  Scientific  Criti- 
cism. By  R.  G.  MOULTON,  M.A. 
Second  Edition,  Enlarged.  Crown 
8vo,  6s. 


MOULTON.  THE  ANCIENT  CLAS- 
SICAL DRAMA.  A  Study  in  Lite- 
rary Evolution.  Intended  for 
Readers  in  English  and  in  the 
Original.  By  R.  G.  MOULTON, 
M.A.  Crown  8vo,  Ss.  6</. 


MILTON.  SAMSON  AGONISTES.^ 
Edited,  with  Introduction  and 
Notes,  by  J.  CHURTON  COLLINS, 
M.A.  Extra  fcap.  8vo,  stiff 
covers,  is. 


CLARENDON.  C';  I.ACTERSAND 
EPISODES  OF  THU  GREAT  REr 
BELLION.  Selections  from  Cla'- 
rendon.  Edited  by  G.  BOYLE, 
M.A.,  Dean  of  Salisbury.  Crown 
8vo,  gilt  top,  7j.  6d. 


DRYDEN.  AN  ESSAY  OF  DRA- 
MATIC POESY.  Edited,  with 
Notes,  by  THOMAS  ARNOLD, 
M.A.  Extra  fcap.  8vo,  3^.  6d. 

ADDISON.  SELECTIONS  FROM 
PAPERS  IN  THE  SPECTATOR. 
With  Notes.  By  T.  ARNOLD, 
M.A.  Extra  fcap.  8vo,  4^.  6d. 
In  Parchment,  6s. 


STEELE.  SELECTIONS  FRO?,  THE 
TATLER,  SPECTATOR,  AND  (  -j.^- 
DIAN.  Edited  by  AUSTIN  DOT.  >N. 
Extra  fcap.  8vo,  55-.  In  IV.i  h- 
ment,  js.  6d. 

GRAY.  SELECTED  POEMS.  Edited 
by  EDMUND  GOSSE,  M.A.  Extra 
fcap.  8vo.  In  Parchment,  ^s. 

GOLDSMITH.  SELECTED  POEMS. 
Edited  with  Introduction  and 
Notes,  by  AUSTIN  DOBSON.  Extra 
fcap.  8vo,  3-y.  6d.  In  Parchment, 


JOHNSON.  WIT  AND  WISDOM  UP 
SAMUEL  JOHNSON.  Edited  K 
G.  BIRKVSECK  HILL,  D.  C  L. 
Crown  8vo,  ys.  6d. 

BURNS.  SELECTED  POEMS.  Edited, 
with  Introduction,  Notes,  r  1  a 
Glossary,  by  J.  LOGIE  ROLI.UT- 
SON,  M.A.  Crown  8vo,  6s. 

BYRON.  CHILDE  HAROLD.  With 
Introduction  and  Notes,  by  H.  F. 
TOZER,  M.A.  Extra  fcap.  8vo, 
$s.  6d.  In  Parchment,  5*. 

SCOTT.  M  ARM  ION.  Edited,  with 
Introduction  and  Notes,  by  T. 
BAYNE.  Extra  fcap.  8vo,  3^.  6d. 

PALGRAVE.  THE  TREASURY  OF 
SACRED  SONG.  With  Notes  Ex- 
planatory and  Biographical.  By 
F.  T.  PALGRAVE,  M.A.  Half 
vellum,  gilt  top,  ios.6d. 


©jforfc 

AT    THE    CLARENDON    PRESS 
LONDON:    HENRY    FROWDE 

OXFORD   UNIVERSITY    PRESS   WAREHOUSE,    AMEN    CORNER,   E.G.