Skip to main content

Full text of "Water rights on the Mokelumne river and legal issues at the East Bay Municipal Utility District, 1927-1966 : oral history transcript / 1997"

See other formats

University of California Berkeley 

Regional Oral History Office University of California 

The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California 

East Bay Municipal Utility District Oral History Series 

Harold Raines 


With Introductions by 
John W. McFarland 

Frank E. Howard 

Interview Conducted by 

Germaine LaBerge 

in 1995 

Copyright O 1997 by The Regents of the University of California 

Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading 
participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of 
Northern California, the West, and the Nation. Oral history is a method of 
collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a 
narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well- 
informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the 
historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for 
continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected 
manuscript is indexed, bound with photographs and illustrative materials, and 
placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in 
other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, 
oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete 
narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in 
response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, 
and irreplaceable. 


All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement 
between The Regents of the University of California and Harold 
Raines dated October 4, 1995. The manuscript is thereby made 
available for research purposes. All literary rights in the 
manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The 
Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley. No part 
of the manuscript may be quoted for publication without the written 
permission of the Director of The Bancroft Library of the University 
of California, Berkeley. 

Requests for permission to quote for publication should be 
addressed to the Regional Oral History Office, 486 Library, 
University of California, Berkeley 94720, and should include 
identification of the specific passages to be quoted, anticipated 
use of the passages, and identification of the user. The legal 
agreement with Harold Raines requires that he be notified of the 
request and allowed thirty days in which to respond. 

It is recommended that this oral history be cited as follows: 

Harold Raines, "Water Rights on the 
Mokelumne River and Legal Issues at the 
East Bay Municipal Utility District," an 
oral history conducted in 1995 by Germaine 
LaBerge, Regional Oral History Office, The 
Bancroft Library, University of 
California, Berkeley, 1997. 

Copy no. / 

Harold Raines, ca. 1959 

Cataloging information 

RAINES, Harold (b. 1901) EBMUD Attorney 

Water Rights on the Mokelumne River and Legal Issues at the East Bay 
Municipal Utility District. 1927-1966. 1997, viii, 108 pp. 

Family background and childhood, Washington State and California; UC 
Berkeley, B.A. and J.D., 1925; assistant attorney for East Bay Municipal 
Utility District (EBMUD), 1927-1947: recollections of director George 
Pardee and attorney Theodore Wittschen, early days at EBMUD; attorney for 
EBMUD, 1947-1966: formation of Special District # 1, water law and right of 
condemnation, negotiations for extra Mokelumne River water (1949-1959) and 
historic agreement with mountain counties, recreation at district 
reservoirs, water f luoridation; comments on boards of directors, East Bay 
Regional Parks, and California legislature. 

Introduction by John McFarland, General Manager (retired), East Bay 
Municipal Utility District, and Frank Howard, Attorney for EBMUD (retired). 

Interviewed 1995 by Germaine LaBerge for the East Bay Municipal Utility 
District Oral History Series. Regional Oral History Office, The Bancroft 
Library, University of California, Berkeley. 

Underwritten by the East Bay Municipal Utility District. 

TABLE OF CONTENTS- -Harold Raines 

INTRODUCTION by Frank Howard i 

INTRODUCTION by John W. McFarland ii 




Grandparents, Parents, and Immediate Family 1 
Schooling in Washington State 3 
Determination of a Legal Career 3 
Early Jobs 5 
Transfer to University of California, Berkeley, 1921 6 
Boalt Hall School of Law, 1923-1925 7 
The Bar Exam and the Law Office of Joseph Raines 10 

II ATTORNEY AT EBMUD, 1927-1966 12 
Interview with Theodore Wittschen 12 
Overview of the Legal Department 13 
The Kieffer Case, 1927, and Condemnation Suits 16 
Marriage, 1937, and Family 17 
Memories of Theodore Wittschen 18 
Accounting Duties and Odd Jobs 19 
Outside Interests 21 
More on T. P. Wittschen 22 
Writing Briefs for the Trials 24 
Leslie Irving 26 
Appointment as General Counsel, 1947 27 
Sociability and Function of the Board of Directors 30 
Memories of Governor George Pardee 31 

"Pickhandle" Pardee 31 

Board of Directors President 32 

The Park Issue 35 

Public Relations 36 

Arthur P. Davis, General Manager and Chief Engineer 38 

Cash Payments and National Banks 40 

Legislative Dealing and S. C. Masterson 41 

Legal Department Secretaries 42 

Aside on Frank Howard and the Camp fire Girls 43 

Formation of Special District #1 45 
Negotiations with the U.S. Maritime Commission 46 

Southern Pacific Negotiations 47 

Golden Gate Fields Negotiations 48 

Right of Condemnation and Other Legal Issues 50 

The Land Department 51 
Business Law 

EBMUD Representative in Washington 55 

World War II 56 

The Board of Directors 57 

Changes in the Organization, 1946 59 

Leroy Hamman as President 60 

Louis Breuner and Hart Eastman 62 

Jack Reilley and Francis Blanchard 63 


The Beginnings of the Land Department 65 

Application for More Water, 1949 67 

The County of Origin Law 69 

Unsatisfactory Permit from Harvey Banks, July 1956 70 

Henry Holsinger from the Department of Water Resources 71 

Opinion of Attorney General Pat Brown, 1956 73 

Hearing Before the State Water Rights Board 75 

Meetings with Counties of Origin 76 

Historic Agreement, 1959, with Amador and Calaveras Counties 

The Board and the Legislature 80 

Recreational Facilities 82 

Labor 83 

Friendly Relations with Adversaries 84 

Water Fluoridation 86 

Taxation Issues 87 

An Antitrust Suit 88 

Development of Water Rights Law 90 



Introduction by John W. McFarland 

When I was appointed to the position of Manager of the new Control 
Division by the EBMUD Board of Directors in 1947, Harold Raines had already 
been on the legal staff for twenty years. He was one of the principal 
architects of EBMUD legal policy and operations. He was a great advisor to 
me during my early years, and later after I was appointed General Manager. 
I was proud to have participated in his selection as Chief Attorney in 
December of 1947. 

His greatest moment was when, in 1959, he convinced then-Attorney 
General of California Pat Brown to approve a major permit for water rights 
to the Mokelumne River in Amador and Calaveras Counties, then in 
litigation. Without these water rights, EBMUD could not have progressed as 
it has through the years. 

Harold Raines retired April 30, 1966. 

John W. McFarland 

General Manager (retired), EBMUD 

Orinda, California 
July 1996 


Introductionby Frank E. Howard 

For more than seventy years the General Counsel of the East Bay 
Municipal Utility District has faced issues that have shaped the legal 
history of California. The role of EBMUD attorneys in securing and 
protecting water rights has added important chapters in the annals of 
Wetsern water law. In addition to the accomplishments in water resource 
development and protection, the water district's attorneys have been 
involved in landmark decisions in many areas of public law, including 
eminent domain, taxation, land use planning, public contracts, and 
municipal financing. With the creation of the Special District and 
construction of wastewater treatment facilities, EBMUD lawyers began to 
face new legal issues in areas which subsequently became the environmental 
law development of the sixties. 

The period from 1953 to 1973 brought major annexations to the EBMUD 
service area. This triggered needs for major facility expansions and a 
supplemental water supply. The "flip side" of these needs were new legal 
challenges as well as increased state and federal regulatory requirements. 
The seventies and eighties brought new legal issues in public employment, 
municipal financing, and environmental control and challenge. 

In 1995, the district asked The Bancroft Library of the University of 
California, Berkeley, to conduct an oral history series of the General 
Counsel's Office. The Regional Oral History Office proposed to interview 
leading lawyers for the district to record and preserve their memories. 
The primary sources available for the project, Harold Raines, John B. 
Reilley, and Robert Maddow, enjoyed careers which spanned almost the entire 
seventy-year history of EBMUD. They were three of only four attorneys who 
led the legal department since its formation in 1923. By recording the 
personal recollections and anecdotal observations of those directly 
involved in the major legal and legislative contests of the district, the 
written records will be amplified and strengthened to the benefit of future 
managements, historians, and the public in general. 

Frank E. Howard 
Attorney at Law 

Walnut Creek, California 
April 11, 1997 



The Regional Oral History Office has long been interested in 
California water issues. In 1991, the East Bay Municipal Utility District 
(EBMUD) asked ROHO to interview Walter McLean, a civil engineer who 
specialized in water resources engineering. So we were delighted when 
Frank Howard, representing a group of retired EBMUD attorneys, engineers 
and managers, approached our office suggesting a project to document the 
history of water rights litigation from the standpoint of EBMUD. The idea 
was to begin with interviews of Harold Raines, John B. Reilley, and Robert 
Maddow, all former general counsel for the district. The EBMUD Board of 
Directors accepted a proposal drafted by Frank Howard of the Friends of 
Western Water Law and with the board's funding, we began to document the 
work of EBMUD 's general counsel's office. 

I first met Harold Raines and Jack Reilley in August 1995 for a 
preliminary conversation about their background and the goals of the oral 
histories. Mr Raines, a 1925 graduate of UC Berkeley's Boalt Hall School 
of Law, presented a dapper appearance and gentlemanly manner along with a 
very good memory of Governor George Pardee, the first president of the 
district's board of directors, of Theodore Wittschen, the first general 
counsel, and of the development of water law during his forty years 
at EBMUD (1927-1966). 

Four interviews were recorded at Mr. Raines's gracious home at Rossmoor 
in Walnut Creek, California, on September 29, October 4, 18, and 20, 1995. 
In preparation for the sessions, I consulted various sources at the Water 
Resources Center Archives at O'Brien Hall on the Berkeley campus (where Mr. 
Raines has deposited several papers relevant to his work on the Mokelumne 
River), in addition to Mr. Raines's very carefully kept scrapbooks. We sat 
at his dining room table where he thoughtfully answered questions, taking 
time to think through the issues and organize his responses. 

A native Californian, Harold Raines enjoyed an "idyllic boyhood" as 
the oldest of three children in Vallejo and in the state of Washington, 
where his father worked in a civilian capacity for the U.S. Navy. He was 
always headed toward a legal career but had no idea it would encompass 
water and business law. After a short time in private practice with Uncle 
Joseph Raines, he joined the young East Bay Municipal Utility District in 
1927, hired by the legendary Theodore Wittschen, then general counsel. 
Because Mr. Wittschen was often in the field litigating, young Hal sat in 
at board of directors' meetings and gained experience wearing many 
different hats. The oral history covers these early days at the district 
with descriptions of many colorful characters besides Wittschen and Pardee. 
Mr. Raines describes condemnation suits, the building of Pardee and 
Camanche Reservoirs, the formation of Special District #1 for sewage 
treatment, and most importantly the gaining of an additional 125 acre feet 
of water on the Mokelumne River, negotiations which lasted for ten years. 


Quiet and unassuming, Harold Raines negotiated with the Department of 
Water Resources, the Attorney General's Office, the Department of Finance, 
the Department of Fish and Game, and Southern Pacific Railroad to name a 
few. Not trained as a litigator, he used negotiation and clear written 
words to present the district's case and prevail. Any person interested in 
the development of water law needs to read the story of the historic 
agreement reached between Araador and Calaveras Counties and EBMUD. 

He speaks with great fondness of his years representing the 
district, mentioning the family atmosphere. He is still devoted to his 
former employer and belongs to a group of retired district employees who 
meet to advise on water matters reaching into the twenty- first century. 
Upon Harold Raines's retirement in 1966, a district spokesperson lauded 
him: "...the final test of a man is what his contemporaries really think of 
him, and it is a test that Hal passes with flying colors. Those who know 
him like and respect him, and those who know him best like and respect him 
the most." 

When the interview process was complete, the tapes were transcribed 
in the Regional Oral History Office, lightly edited, and sent to Mr. Raines 
for his approval. He made some additions to round out the discussions and 
returned the transcript promptly. The interviews were corrected, amended, 
and indexed at our office. 

Many thanks to Frank Howard who gave impetus to this project and to 
the East Bay Municipal Utility District for financial support. Water law 
has been central to California history. Securing mountain water rights for 
large metropolitan districts has been an ongoing issue in the latter half 
of the twentieth century. Harold Raines's contribution to a peaceful 
settlement with mountain "counties of origin" is relied on today in the 
1990s as new water rights issues arise. 

For the introduction to this volume thanks go to John McFarland, 
retired general manager of the East Bay Municipal Utility District from 
1950 to 1968, and Frank Howard, retired member of EBMUD 's legal department. 

The Regional Oral History Office was established in 1954 to record 
the lives of persons who have contributed significantly to the history of 
California and the West. One of its major areas of investigation has been 
the history of California's water resources; a listing of oral history 
interviews in this series follows. The office is a division of The 
Bancroft Library and is under the direction of Willa K. Baum. 

Germaine LaBerge 
Interviewer /Editor 

July 2, 1996 

Regional Oral History Office 

The Bancroft Library 

April 1997 

The following Regional Oral History Office interviews have been completed by 
the Regional Oral History Office, a division of The Bancroft Library. The 
Office was established to tape record interviews with persons who have 
contributed significantly to the development of the West. Transcripts of the 
interviews, typed, indexed, and bound, may be purchased at cost for deposit in 
research libraries. 

Single Interview Volumes 

Adams, Frank (1875-1967) Irrigation engineer, economist 

Irrigation, Reclamation and Water Administration. 1959, 491 pp. 

Banks, Harvey (b. 1910) Director, Department of Water Resources 

California Water Project. 1955-1961. 1967 82 pp. 

Beard, Daniel P. (b. 1943) Staff Director, House Committee on Nat. Res. 
Passage of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act. 1990-1992; The 
Role of George Miller. 1996, 67 pp. 

Downey, Stephen W. (1876-1958) Attorney 

California Water and Power Attorney. 1957, 316 pp. 

Durbow, William (1886-1958) Manager, irrigation district 

Irrigation District Leader. 1958, 213 pp. 

Gianelli, William R. (b. 1919) Director, Department of Water Resources 

The California State Department of Water Resources. 1967-1973. 
1985, 86 pp. 

Golb, Richard K. (b. 1962) Senator Seymour staff 

Passage of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act, 1991-1992; The 
Role of John Seymour. 1997, 136 pp. 

Graff, Thomas J.(b. 1944) Environmental Defense Fund attorney 

Yardas, David (b. 1956) Water resources analyst 

The Passage of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act. 1991-1992; 

Environmental Defense Fund Perspective. 1996, 133 pp. 

Harding, Sidney T. (1883-1969) Professor of Irrigation, UC Berkeley 

A Life in Western Water Development. 1967, 524 pp. 


Hedgpeth, Joel (b. 1911) Marine biologist 

Marine Biologist and Environmentalist; Pycnogonids. Progress, and 
Preserving Bays. Salmon, and other Living Things. 1996, 319 pp. 

Jones, Herbert (1880-1970) California State Senator 

California Government and Public Issues. 1958, 318 pp. 

Lambert, Charles F. (1887-1959) Land promoter, irrigation district official 
Sacramento Valley Irrigation and Land. 1957, 83 pp. 

Leedom, Sam R. (1896-1971) Newspaperman, water project administrator 
California Water Development. 1930-1955. 1967, 83 pp. 

Leopold, Luna B. (b. 1915) Hydrologist, educator 

Hydrology, Geomorphology, and Environmental Policy: U.S. Geological 
Survey, 1950-1072. and UC Berkeley. 1972-1987. 1993, 309 pp. 

Mason, J. Rupert (1886-1959) Municipal bond broker 

J. Rupert Mason on Single Tax. Irrigation Districts, and Municipal 
bankruptcy. 1985, 372 pp. 

McLean, Walter R. (b. 1903) Water resources engineer 

From Pardee to Buckhorn: Water Resources Engineering and Water Policy in 
the East Bay Municipal Utility District. 1927-1991. 1993, 330 pp. 

Nelson, Barry (b. 1959) Save the Bay director 

The Passage of the Central Valley Project Improvement Act. 1991-1992: 
Executive Director, Save San Francisco Bay Assocation. 1994, 88 pp. 

Peltier, Jason (b. 1955) Manager, Central Valley Project Water Association 
The Passage of the Central Valley Prolect Improvement Act, 1991-1992; 
Manager, Central Valley Project Water Association. 1994, 84 pp. 

Raines, Harold (b. 1901) EBMUD attorney 

Water Rights on the Mokelumne River and Legal Issues at the East Bay 
Municipal Utility District. 1927-1966. 1997, 108 pp. 

Reilley, John B. (b. 1916) EBMUD attorney 

Water Rights and Legal Issues at the East Bay Municipal Utility 
District. 1951-1983. 1997, 130 pp. 

Robie, Ronald B. (b. 1937) Director, Department of Water Resources 

The California State Department of Water Resources, 1975-1983. 
1989, 97 pp. 

Taylor, Paul S. (1895-1984) Professor of Economics, specialist in reclamation 
California Social Scientist. (Three volumes) 

Volume I: Education. Field Research, and Family. 1973, 342 pp. 
Volumes II and III: California Water and Agricultural Labor. 1975, 519 


Multiple Interview Volumes 

California Water Issues, 1950-1966. 1981, 458 pp. 

(Goodwin Knight/Edmund G. Brown, Sr. Project). Interviews with: 

Edmund G. Brown, Sr., "The California Water Project: Personal Interest 

and Involvement in the Legislation, Public Support, and Construction, 


B. Abbott Goldberg, "Water Policy Issues in the Courts, 1950-1966." 

Ralph M. Brody, "Devising Legislation and Building Public Support for 

the California Water Project, 1950-1960; Brief History of the Westlands 

Water District." 

William E. Warne, "Administration of the Department of Water Resources, 


Paul R. Bonderson, "Executive Officer, Regional and State Water 

Pollution and Water Quality Control Boards," 1950-1966." 

Save San Francisco Bay Association. 1961-1986. 1987, 220 pp. 
Interviews with: 
Barry Bunshoft, Esther Gulick, Catherine Kerr, Sylvia McLaughlin. 

The San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, 196A-1973. 

Interviews with Joseph E. Bodovitz, Melvin Lane, and E. Clement Shute. 
1986, 98 pp. 

Interview in Process; Robert Maddow, for the East Bay Municipal Utility 
District Series (water rights and legal issues). 

For other California water-related interviews see Land-Use Planning and 
Sanitary Engineering lists. 


Regional Oral History Office 
Room 486 The Bancroft Library 

University of California 
Berkeley, California 94720 

(Please write clearly. Use black ink.) 

Your full name 

Date of birth 

Y " I 


Father's full name 

-- / y 7 

Mother's full name 

Your spouse 

/t ) Birthplace 



Areas of expertise 


Where did you grow up? 
Present community 


CMV 3 ^ LJ 

," -IS ./ * k. *~S 


Other interests or activities 

Organizations in which you acegEtive 

[Interview 1: September 29, 1995] it 1 

Grandparents, Parents, and Immediate Family 

LaBerge: We usually like to begin with your childhood and background, so 
tell me where you were born and a little bit about your parents. 
I think you were born in Vallejo? 

Raines: Yes. I was born in Vallejo, California, on April 8, 1901. My 
parents were Thomas Raines, Jr., and Anna Barry Raines. They 
were early pioneers in California. My father was born in 1870 in 
Vallejo, and my mother was born in San Francisco in 1877. I have 
a brother who lives in Pacific Grove, California, and a sister 
who died nine years ago in Pasadena, California. 

LaBerge: What are their names? 

Raines: My brother's name is Raymond Thomas Raines, and my sister's name 
was Marian Cecilia Maley. 

LaBerge: Were you the oldest? 

Raines: Yes, I was the oldest child in the family. Getting back to my 
parents, at the time I was born, my father was employed in the 
paint department on Mare Island navy yard in Vallejo. My parents 
were married in San Francisco and I'm informed that they, 
immediately left for Santa Cruz for their honeymoon. 

LaBerge: Do you know what year that was? 

I This symbol (it) indicates that a tape or tape segment has begun or 
ended. A guide to the tapes follows the transcript. 

Raines: Yes, they were married February 12, 1899. 
LaBerge: Did they immediately go back to Vallejo to settle? 

Raines: Yes, they went back to Vallejo. There they built a nice two- 
story house at 713 Pennsylvania Street, next door to the home of 
my father's parents. 

LaBerge: Tell me about your parents being pioneers. 

Raines: My paternal grandfather was born in Albany, New York, in 1838. 
He arrived in Oakland, California, in 1855. My paternal 
grandmother was born in Ireland. She left Ireland in company 
with an older sister and the sister's husband. She told tales of 
a stormy month-long crossing of the Atlantic in a small sailing 
vessel. Both grandparents came to California by ship after 
crossing the Isthmus of Panama. 

[Grandmother Raines arrived in California in 1863. They 
were married in 1865 and came to Vallejo in 1869. There was at 
least one "Raines" living continuously thereafter until the death 
of my cousin, Ann Raines, about 1980. 

I know nothing about the early years of my maternal 
grandparents. Grandfather David Barry, Jr., was born in Boston, 
Massachusetts, and Grandmother Mary Gray Barry was born in 
Providence, Rhode Island. They came to San Francisco by ship by 
way of the Isthmus of Panama. 

My Grandfather Raines was a commercial painter by trade, and 
my Grandfather Barry was a sail maker by trade. 

Grandmother Barry died in 1899, before my birth. 

Florence Margaret Adelman and I were married at Del Monte, 
California, on December 27, 1931. We have a daughter, Margaret 
Ann Singleton, who was born on October 7, 1941. She is currently 
Personnel Director for the Saratoga School District. She has two 
children, our grandchildren, Elizabeth Ann Singleton and James 
Thomas Singleton. Margie is a graduate of the University of 
Oregon, with a B.S. degree. Beth graduated from California State 
University at San Francisco, having majored in philosophy. Jamie 
is now attending California State University at San Jose, 
majoring in anthropology.] 1 

'Bracketed material was added by Mr. Raines during the editing 
process . 

Schooling in Washington State 

LaBerge: How about if we go on to your childhood? 

Raines: As I say, I was born in 1901, and my father was working on the 

Mare Island navy yard. He was a foreman in the paint department 
there, and one year after I was born, in 1902, he left Mare 
Island and took a position as manager of the paint department at 
the newly organized navy yard in Bremerton, Washington. We lived 
in Bremerton until 1916; when I was fifteen years old we left 
there. I had an idyllic boyhood in Bremerton. The town couldn't 
> have been more than a thousand in population. It was on a 
forested peninsula jutting out into Puget Sound and it was a 
great area for me and my brother and sister to roam and indulge 
in all kinds of aquatic and other activities. I attended local 
schools there and went on to high school in Bremerton. 

LaBerge: Is that where you finished high school? 

Raines: No, I only went about a year and a half to high school in 

Bremerton. In 1916, when the American government was beginning 
to worry about the outbreak of World War I, my father left 
Bremerton and we moved to Seattle where he took a position as 
manager of the paint department at the Skinner and Eddy Shipyard, 
which was engaged in building large cargo ships for the federal 
preparedness program. I finished high school in Seattle. 

LaBerge: Any particular teachers that were memorable? 

Raines: I was on the debating team at Queen Anne High School in Seattle, 
and was quite active in student affairs. When I graduated from 
Queen Anne High School in 1919, that year I entered the 
University of Washington as a freshman. I also at that time 
joined Psi Upsilon national fraternity, and in my freshman year 
at the university I was on the freshman debating team. In my 
sophomore year I was on the varsity debating team. 

Determination of a Legal Career 

LaBerge: That was good preparation for courtroom work. 

Raines: Well, I thought about this particular point: at the University of 
Washington, I enrolled in the pre-legal course and that's another 

LaBerge: Tell me that story. 

Raines: Well, my uncle, Joseph M. Raines, was a prominent lawyer in 

Solano County, California. He lived in Vallejo, with his office 
in Fairfield, the county seat. During my infancy, apparently as 
a result of some assistance my parents had given him when he was 
in Hastings Law School in San Francisco, he told them that, if I 
became a lawyer, he would employ me in his office. So, from 
there on, my entire scholastic efforts were directed to the point 
that I was to become a lawyer and go into my uncle Joe's office. 

[As my experience later was to develop, this was both an 
advantage and a possible disadvantage to this arrangement. The 
advantage was that I had a sense of security throughout my 
scholastic years, false security, it later appeared. The 
disadvantage was that, because of this sense of security, I did 
some things and didn't do others, that I might have done 
differently had I known that I had to face a hostile job market 
immediately after graduation. However, without this incentive, I 
probably would not have become a lawyer.] 1 

LaBerge: Did your parents tell you this as you were growing up? 

Raines: Oh, yes. There was no question about what 1 was to do: when I 
got out of college it was to go into Uncle Joe's office. 

LaBerge: Had you ever thought of doing something else? 

Raines: Well, I never had. The course was laid out for me and I had no 
other ideas, or no other bent, so I went along. 

LaBerge: Did your parents anticipate your brother and sister would also go 
on to college? 

Raines: Yes, but my brother was not a student. He was very active, and 
he became a successful rancher in the San Joaquin Valley. And 
that sort of thing was more his bent than anything else. 

LaBerge: So you always knew you were going to go on to college. It's a 
good thing you were the student . 

Raines: Yes, I was a pretty good student. I well remember my old English 
teacher in Queen Anne High School in Seattle, Professor DeLacy, 
once took me aside at the end of one class day and told me about 
Phi Beta Kappa. He thought that I should and would become a Phi 

Bracketed material was added by Mr. Raines during the editing 
process . 

Raines : 

Beta Kappa, which, of course, I never was. I was not that much 
of a devoted student; I really had a good time in high school and 
in college. 

What other activities did you do besides debating? 
That was about it. 

LaBerge: Had both of your parents gone to high school? 

Raines : 

Raines : 

My father did not. After graduation from the eighth grade, he 
went to work as an apprentice painter on Mare Island. My mother, 
at the time of her marriage to my father, was attending San Jose 
Normal School, which was a teachers' institute and a predecessor 
of the present San Jose State University. The marriage ended her 
scholastic career. 

But she kept it up with you. She certainly encouraged you. 

Yes, very much, 
too much. They 
I know it was a 
through college 
and so on. So, 
and assistance. 

Well, they really didn't need to encourage me 
really didn't have any great amount of money, and 
trial financially for them to see me all the way 
and law school, by such things as fraternities, 
I'm truly grateful to them for their struggles 

Early Jobs 

LaBerge: Did you have jobs along the way? 

Raines: Well, I always worked in the summer, and at Christmas break. 

Several years I worked at the post office during the Christmas 
period delivering parcel post packages. And during the college 
sessions I had jobs, too. I remember one winter in Seattle I had 
a job in a laundry- -cleaning up the laundry at the end of the 
work day- -it was a night job. One summer at the University of 
Washington I worked with pick and shovel in the construction of 
the foundation for the new University of Washington stadium. 
Also, during my high school days --that was the period of World 
War I-- and during the summers and vacation periods I worked at 
Skinner and Eddy Shipyard in Seattle, where my father was also 
employed. I worked as a shipfitter's helper, and also a session 
I had as a timekeeper. In going backward, when I was fourteen 
years old, I had a job on the Bremerton navy yard. I started as 
a rivet passer, and I wound up there as a shipfitter's helper. 

That summer I worked eight hours a day, six days a week, for 64 
cents per hour. 

Several summers the family camped out on Puget Sound . My 
father had developed portable camping equipment we could put up 
and we had wonderful times as children on the beaches and in the 
water off Bremerton. 

Transfer to University of California. Berkeley, 1921 

LaBerge: How did you get from Washington to Berkeley? 

Raines: Well, after the end of World War I, things of course slowed down 
at the shipyard in Seattle where my father worked. And he just 
decided to look for a change in his employment, so he--I don't 
know if it was through civil service examination, or just what-- 
but he was offered the position of manager at the paint 
department at Mare Island navy yard in California, back to his 
early department. Back in Vallejo, our old setting. So, he 
worked there until 1940. 

[While so employed, after much experimentation, he developed 
an anti-fouling coating material for ships' bottoms. Up until 
recent years, as far as I know, it was still in use by the navy. 
He reached the mandatory retirement age in 1935, and by 
presidential order his tenure was increased five years to 1940 so 
that he could complete this program.] 1 

LaBerge: So he was a civilian employee? 

Raines: Yes. I transferred from the University of Washington--! was at 
the end of my sophomore year--to the University of California, 
where I entered the pre-legal course. That was where I finished 
with the A.B degree in 1923 and the J.D. degree in 1925. 


LaBerge: What was that like for you to transfer? 

Raines: I had no problem. My scholastic record was clear, and I was 
fully accredited as a junior. 

Bracketed material was added by Mr. Raines during the editing 

LaBerge: Did you go into the same fraternity? 

Raines: Yes. 

LaBerge: That must have helped. 

Raines: That was a help, yes. I got into the local chapter of Psi 
Upsilon fraternity. 

LaBerge: Did you live at home or on campus? 

Raines: No, I lived at home when my family had settled in Albany, 

California. That was really just a walk away from campus. I 
lived at home except for my senior yearthat was ending in 1923 
--I was house manager at the Psi Upsilon fraternity and lived at 
the fraternity house. I was also a member of the Phi Delta Phi 
legal fraternity, a national fraternity, at Boalt Hall School of 
Law at the University of California. 

Boalt Hall School of Law. 1923-1925 


Raines : 

Any memorable teachers, 

either undergraduate or your law 

Yes. [As an undergraduate at Berkeley I well recall Professor 
Charles Mills Gayley and his one unit class of "Great Books." It 
was so popular that classes were held in Wheeler Auditorium to 
full houses. I also well remember the English classes of 
Professor Chauncy Wells. English was my favorite subject in high 
school and college. History was next. I always did well in 
English. Professor Chapman gave interesting courses on 
California history. He had a fine personality. 

At Boalt Hall the one law professor who remains in my memory 
is Alexander Kidd, known to the students as "Captain" Kidd. He 
entered the classroom with an armload of books and he always wore 
a green eyeshade. He had a short fuse and as the class work 
progressed, his frustration with students' answers to his 
questions would arise until reaching his boiling point, when he 
would pick up his books and stalk out of the room, leaving the 
class high and dry. I think this was part of his "act" as it was 
repeated a couple of times per semester. He taught Evidence and, 
I think, first year Criminal Law. Later on, we were both members 
of the Alameda County Bar Association and we would meet at their 

meetings. I always called him "Captain" and he seemed somewhat 
pleased to be so remembered. 

The Boalt Hall class I enjoyed the most was called Bills and 
Notes. I did well in it. I don't remember who the instructor 
was. Maybe I should have become a banker, instead of a lawyer.] 1 

I don't know whether you'd call this presciencemy senior 
year at Boalt Hall there was a course being given by William 
Colby. [showing booklet] 

LaBerge: What is this we're looking at? 
Raines: At my thesis. 

LaBerge: Oh, my goodness! I want to read this into the tape. The thesis 
is called "The Apportionment of Water Rights in Dry Seasons." 

Raines: Well, that was what I was getting to why there was such a 
prescience about this. William Colby was a lawyer in San 
Francisco. I later learned that he was a disciple of John Muir, 
and I think also he was among the founders of the Sierra Club. 
But during my senior year, he gave a course on water law at Boalt 
Hall; it was a semester course. And, again I say--prescience-- 
for some reason I took it. 

LaBerge: Because you had a choice. 

Raines: Yes, in other words, I had met all the requirements and I had 
extra time available. So I took the course, this semester 
course, and the next semester he had a course in mining law and I 
also took that. And then, I wrote my doctoral thesis at the 
conclusion of my senior year, the title being "Apportionment of 
Water Rights in Dry Seasons." I went on from there but I've 
often wondered just what my interest was in that particular 

LaBerge: Because at this time you were still thinking you would practice 
with your uncle. 

Raines: Yes. 

LaBerge: And what kind of law did he practice? 

Bracketed material was added by Mr. Raines during the editing 

Raines: General. I knew I was going to the country office in Fairfield, 
California, so that may have had something to do with it, I just 
don't know. That was an agricultural community. 

LaBerge: What other fields did you like when you were in law school? 

Raines: Well, I can't think of anything special. I was anxious to get 
out [laughter] and get into the job market. 

LaBerge: Did you do any legal work during the summers? 

Raines: No, I spent one summer vacation working on a large fruit ranch in 
the Suisun Valley, which includes Fairfield. I think my uncle 
got me that job. Another summer I worked--my uncle Frank had a 
large grain ranch in the San Joaquin Valley. In those days it 
was dry farming and part of one summer I worked on his harvest 
crew, harvesting grain, and that lasted only a fairly short time. 
I then found a job on the San Francisco waterfront for American 
Express moving freight around with a hand truck. And then, as I 
say, I always had a Christmas job of various kinds. 

LaBerge: Did you get involved in campus activities at Berkeley? 

Raines: No, I didn't. I was quite active at the University of 

Washington, but when I came into the University of California I 
had only one year before I was to enter law school, and I decided 
that I better spend my activity in connection with the law school 
rather than doing anything else. Incidentally, Mr. Colby was 
away a couple of times and Mrs. Colby took over the class. 

LaBerge: Oh, my. Any memorable classmates? 

Raines: Well, I had a lot of memorable classmates and fraternity brothers 
so my mind is just flooded with thosethere' s something else I 
may add going backshall I get into my work at my uncle's 

LaBerge: Yes, I'd like to go on, if you feel you have time and are not too 
tired from talking. 

Raines: Well, I could start on it. 


The Bar Exam and the Law Office of Joseph Raines 

LaBerge: Good, okay. Before that, tell me about the bar exam. Was that 
difficult to study for or pass? 

Raines: Oh, yes, very, very tough. 
LaBerge: How did you prepare? 

Raines: Well, my parents financed a special course, tutoring, for the 

examination. Then I reviewed my classroom notes of three years 
and I had many discussions with my classmates. 

LaBerge: All written? 

Raines: No, written and oral. It was a two-day examination. And I 
remember one of the examiners was a lawyer from Stockton, 
California, and he gave the oral examination, and when he heard 
my name--"0h, Joe Raines, sure, I know Joe Raines! "--so I figured 
that didn't do me any damage. 

LaBerge: That's right. On the other hand, he might have expected you to 
do better than others. 

Raines: Then, after I graduated [long pause] --let ' s see, we're up to-- 
we're finished with college, with Boalt, and with the bar 

LaBerge: Right. I read also that you were licensed to practice before the 
Treasury Department. 

Raines: That must have been one of thosesort of a routine--! have no 

memory of it. I was also licensed to practice before the federal 
district courts. And I had one very brief appearance in my very 
early days before the federal court and that was it. 

LaBerge: Well, tell me about working for your uncle. 

Raines: It was a difficult period for me. In the first place, the office 
was in Fairfield and I lived in Vallejo with two aunts. And I 
traveled every day by Southern Pacific Railroad from Vallejo to 
Fairfield and back. I didn't know anyone outside of my family, 
and my uncle paid me a hundred dollars a month plus a free pass 
on the Southern Pacific Railroad, for which he was local counsel. 
I'll conclude by saying that the situation just didn't work out 
that well. 


LaBerge: What kind of work did you do? 

Raines: Well, just office work. I mentioned I had no friends in Vallejo. 
Of course, being new to the area, even though it was my 
birthplace, I had no friends and certainly no clients, and things 
just didn't pan out. Finally about May, I guess--1927--I decided 
^ to move back to the city. All of my active friends were in the 
San Francisco area, and I attempted to make friends in Vallejo 
but was not especially successful at that. I used my free pass 
on the railroad almost every weekend to return to my family in 
Albany and my friends in the San Francisco area. In the middle 
of that year, I just quit the job and moved back to Albany. 



Interview with Theodore Wittschen 

Raines: I started looking for a job and had numerous interviews, with no 
particular results, until one day I had a telephone call from my 
friend--a fraternity brother--Erland Erickson, who had landed a 
job at a law office in San Francisco. He told me that he had 
just read in the San Francisco legal newspaper that the assistant 
attorney for the newly created East Bay Municipal Utility 
District in Oakland had resigned to become attorney for the Port 
of Oakland. So I immediately contacted the utility district 
attorney who then was Theodore P. Wittschen and made an 
appointment with him. It went quite well; he was impressed I had 
had just a smattering of utility law in Fairfield in my uncle's 
office and knew something about water law from law school. 

He said, "Well, I'll consider it. I'll let you know." So a 
few days later I had a call from his office that he wanted to see 
me again. I went in and he was quite receptive and, among other 
things, he asked me what salary I expected. I had been receiving 
a hundred dollars a month from my uncle, so I decided to be real 
adventurous: I suggested 125 dollars a month, without knowing 
anything about what the standard going rate was. That was 
acceptable to him, and I started to work in the middle of June, 

LaBerge: What was the standard rate? 

Raines: I don't know, to this day [laughter]. In later years, when 

everything was organized for me at East Bay MUD, there would be 
salary studies and all the rest of that. But this time I had no 
idea. Except I felt I got along all right in the past on a 
hundred, and I could do just as well on $125. 




Raines : 


Raines : 
Raines : 

Did you show him this paper that you wrote, your law school 

I don't know whether I did or not. Going back on that, my uncle 
had a friend, Dan Hadsell, a lawyer in San Francisco; he was a 
water lawyer, and he was one of the men I interviewed for a job. 
My uncle had sent him my thesis to read, and when I appeared in 
his office he pulled it out, and he disagreed completely with my 
conclusions. So that was what a real active water lawyer had to 
say about my thesis. [Things have changed in this part of the 
law, however, and now I may be more clearly right.] 

Well, what kind of questions did Mr. Wittschen ask you? 

I really don't remember. He was a tiger in court, but he had a 
very placid home life. So I think he was concerned about such 
things as my home and my activities and things of that sort. [I 
had played a bit of politics and had a couple of endorsements 
from prominent lawyers.] 

What did he tell you you'd be doing? What did he tell you about 
the job? 

That I don't recall. I don't believe it was much. 

Do you want to stop there for today or do you want to keep going? 

I'll go on. 

Overview of the Legal Department 

LaBerge: Tell me some of your duties when you started working for the 
utility district. 

Raines: Well, it was a case of the blind leading the blind. The office 
at East Bay Municipal Utility District at that time consisted of 
two small floors of the Ray Building at 1924 Broadway, Oakland. 
There was another assistant, Leslie Irving. He was employed 
three months before I was, and I always regarded him as my senior 
for that reason. The office consisted of three rooms: reception 
room and secretaries, Mr. Wittschen 's office, and then in the 
third room, Irving and I had desks back to back. It looked out 
on old-time Oakland. The Capwell now the Emporium- -building was 
under construction, and over on Telegraph the Fox movie theater 
was under construction. 



LaBerge ; 

Raines : 




Mr. Wittschen was involved in heavy litigation on the 
Mokelumne at that time, and he was away from the office for long 
periods. Irving went along with him for most of these out-of- 
town activities. They were mostly in Stockton and in Amador and 
Calaveras counties. I was thrown into a situation in which I 
really wonder how I worked myself out of. Among my first duties 
was attending the board of directors' meetings with resolutions 
and so forth. 

Were you there to give legal advice to the board? 

Yes [laughter]. But Dr. [George] Pardee, who was president of 
the board, was most helpful, and I just kept my mouth shut as 
much as possible and everything worked out well. I had no 
kickbacks on anything I did. 

So you were the one who stayed in the office. 

Yes. I didn't get out at all. 

So, besides board meetings, what were you doing? 

Oh, I don't remember anything special. Just the flow of office 

Did you do research for any of the cases Mr. Wittschen was 

Not at an early date. Later I did a great amount of research. 
When I retired in 1966, I left behind in my office quite a number 
of large loose-leaf notebooks filled with copies of opinions I 
had rendered for him over the years he and I were there together. 
He did the trial work, and I did the homework. Before he went 
into a trial, he always wanted a trial brief. This, of course, 
was a little later when I was more experienced. Before a trial 
he would call me into his office, and he would tell me problems 
he expected to face and which he would like me to study and 
render opinions upon. So, as I say, I left sixteen volumes of 
these opinions behind me. I was told about seven or eight years 
ago by Bob Maddow, then attorney for the district, that the 
volumes were still there and occasionally used, but I don't know 
whether they are now. 

Well, when you started working there- - 
Oh, may I go back to-- 
Oh , sure . 


Raines: On studyingmost of my time in later years at the county law 

library, I had this little leatherbound notebook. I would spend 
hours copying quotations from cases and looking cases up and 
"shepardizing, " we'd call it. Shepard's was an organization that 
put out histories of every decision of the appellate courts in 
the United States, and you could go through paperbound books and 
find out what had happened to a particular decision later on-- 
whether it had been appealed or just what had happened to it. 
So, I "shepardized" every one of the cases I quoted in my 
opinions. And Mr. Wittschen never questioned my conclusions, and 
he used the information I had supplied to him. 

LaBerge: Would you then go watch him in court? 
Raines: Yes, I usually went along with him. 

LaBerge: You were saying at first Irving went with him, but then you-- 

Raines: Well, I gradually assumed that post. Irving was usually busy in 
Sacramento. As the trial was progressing, I would make notes of 
things that- -well, they were brief outlines of the testimony 
being given, the problems raised. I would furnish those to Mr. 
Wittschen at the end of the day for his consideration. That was 
all done in handwriting. Now when I hear about all of the 
computers and the methods of handling legal information, I think 
of the miles I trudged to the county law library and the many 
books I opened. It's amazing. I still am surprised to read the 
law journals. In my day, the journals were full of 
advertisements for law books. There's now not an ad in those 
journals for books; all are for computers and electronic 
equipment . 

LaBerge: In fact, I don't know if lawyers "shepardize" anymore. 
Raines: I think they can run it through a machine now. 

LaBerge: I think so, too. It's amazing. That's why your longhand is so 

good, and it's legible. [laughter] You've had lots of practice. 

Raines: Yes. Well, it's pretty shaky now in comparison to what it once 


The Kieffer Case, 1927, and Condemnation Suits 

Raines : 




Raines : 

LaBerge ; 

When you started, one of the cases going on, I think, was East 
Bay MUD v. Kieffer. Do you remember that case? 

Yes. There again, I was in the officethis is where my memory 
begins to break down. I have to go back to Its Name was M.U.D. 1 

That's where I've gotten my information, too. 

My memory can't compete with that. 

Okay. Well, I read that part of your job was handling personal 
injury claims? 

Well, no. We didn't do much of that. The injury claims in my 
day were largely handled by district personnel, like right-of-way 
agents, things of that sort. Other claims--say, for personal 
injuries, for example, an automobile accidentwe relied on the 
insurance companies to handle those. I understand that now they 
do have a department in the district to handle those things, but 
we didn't then. Probably the most involved it got wasthis was 
the later days the heavy litigation was the Kieffer case, the 
Lodi case, and that sort of activity. [pause] I don't remember 
what I was going to say. 

Well, most were condemnation cases, is that correct? 

Most of the litigation in my day was in condemnation. We had a 
steady stream of cases for rights of way for pipelines, reservoir 
sites, and things of that sort. I always got those cases 
underway- -if the land department couldn't reach an agreement for 
the purchase of a right of way, I would then prepare a 
condemnation complaint and file it. And usually in an office 
interview with a judge, I would secure an order for immediate 
possession and use, which was a statutory matter permitted for 
those agencies and companies using the condemnation process. So, 
the district could then go ahead with its work without any 
interruption. Sometimes there would be a court hearing, but 
usually it was fairly brief. Most of the cases were settled. In 
the larger cases Mr. Wittschen did all the trial work, and later 
Jack Reilley took that chore on. Mr. Wittschen tried the Kieffer 
case, and Irving was with him on that. And he tried the Lodi 
case, and I don't think Irving was with him. But whenever we had 

'John Wesley Noble, Its Name was M.U.D. (Oakland, CA: EBMUD, 1970). 


a case outside of Alameda County, he would always retain a local 
counsel to assist in jury selection and also in the trial. 

LaBerge: Was that common practice? 
Raines: Yes. 

LaBerge: At this time, were there still just three of you in the legal 

Raines: Yes. 

LaBerge: Well, that makes a lot more sense, to just retain people for the 
individual cases. 

Raines: Yes, as long as I was there, there were just three of us. There 
was one period when there were just two of us in the office, up 
through World War II. Sometime toward the end of that war, my 
assistant, John Deal, died unexpectedly. For some reason, I had 
a very difficult time filling the position. [pause] There was a 
period of a year and a half when Miss Lila Wagnor, my secretary, 
and I were the legal department. After the war, of course, 
things began to pick up. Then, I was fortunate enough to secure 
the services of John B. Reilley and, shortly after that, Frank 
Howard . 

Jack was a tower of strength for me. After Wittschen 
retired, we needed another man in the office; I felt that we were 
short-handed because we didn't have a real trial lawyer. I was 
never a trial lawyer; I was an office lawyer. I couldn't handle 
all of the litigation. At that time, I was looking for a 
replacement for the third position and interviewed quite a number 
of people, but they lacked the trial ability that I wanted. So, 
I was finally able to secure the services of John Reilley. He 
was a real help for me because he took over the trial work which 
he handled exceedingly well. He was a nice person, and we still 
have a very good relationship. Frank Howard I had known when he 
was almost a boy in Oakland. When he graduated from Hastings, 
and there was an opening in the district, I was fortunate to 
secure him. 

Marriage, 1937. and Family 

LaBerge: How had you known him? Through his family? 


Raines: My wife [Florence Adelman Raines] was very active in civic 

affairs, really, in Oakland. She was a member of the Women's 
Athletic Club; for a period, she was on the financial committee 
of the Community Chest; she was a member of the women's auxiliary 
of Oakland Children's Hospital and did volunteer work in the 
hospital; and she was also president of the Oakland -Piedmont 
Campfire Girls and did a lot of work in that regard. So, I 
learned about Frank through Campfire activities with my wife. 
His mother was also active in the Campfire activities and she and 
Florence worked together on that. Frank and I got to know each 
other through those activities. 

LaBerge: Tell me about your wife. 

Raines: She was born and raised in the Midwest and was a graduate of the 
University of Chicago. Her family moved to Oakland in 1927, and 
she took a job in the Oakland School District as a counselor- 
teacher. We have a daughter and two grandchildren, Elizabeth and 
James Singleton. Our daughter, Margaret Anne Singleton, is 
personnel director at the Saratoga School District. We were 
married in '37. December 27, 1937. 

LaBerge: And settled in Oakland? 

Raines: Yes. 

LaBerge: And did she continue to teach? 

Raines: She did until our daughter was on the way. She resignedshe was 
always sorry that she didn't continue teaching. But she never 
did. I always felt that our daughter needed her, particularly in 
our daughter's infancy. 

Memories of Theodore Wittschen 

LaBerge: Do you have any anecdotes about Theodore Wittschen? 

Raines: He and his family had a summer place up at Echo Lake in the 
Sierra where they spent the summer vacations. We were very 
close, really, in our relationship. My wife and I were guests at 
their home on many occasions. 

LaBerge: What did you learn from him about either trial practice or how to 
accomplish settlements rather than litigation? 


Raines: I don't think there was anything specialit was just a natural 

growth, except that I never felt that I could grow into his trial 
ability. He came to the utility district with quite a 
background. He had been chief assistant district attorney in 
Alameda County after graduating from Hastings College. For some 
reason, personal to him, or, I don't know the details--he 
resigned and started a private practice. He became the attorney 
for Miller and Lux, which was the huge land and cattle operation 
company with its activities extending from Bakersfield to eastern 
Oregon. In that capacity, he had many water cases. He tried 
water law cases all the way from southern California to Oregon, 
so that when he came to the district he was not only a complete 
trial lawyer, but he had experience in this particular type of 
law. Just how the district managed to employ him, I've never 
learned. He was really a super stroke for the district. He 
could be, well, upset at times, let's put it that way. I've seen 
him on a number of occasions when he was that way, but we never 
had any harsh words between us . He was always friendly and 
helpful; we got along very well together. 

LaBerge: He must have been impressed with the work you did for him. 

Raines: Maybe so. I think he was. Unfortunately, he had migraine 

headaches, and in his office in the Latham Square Building in 
Oakland there was a little water closet and a couch. When one of 
his headache attacks would come on, then he would go to the water 
closet and have an Alka Seltzer. Then he would lie down on the 
couch for a period until things cleared up. 

LaBerge: When did you move from the Ray Building to Latham Square? 

Raines: In 1928. That was when the district acquired the East Bay Water 
Company. [The district took over the office building of that 
company on 16th Street. There was not room enough left for the 
legal department, so we set up shop next door on the upper floor 
of the Latham Square building. We remained there until the 
offices were moved to the new district office building on West 
Grand Avenue . ] ' 

Accounting Duties and Odd Jobs 

LaBerge: Were you involved in those negotiations? 

'Bracketed material was added by Mr. Raines during the editing 


Raines: No, they were handled entirely by Mr. Wittschen. There was one 
incident. The deal was concluded for the purchase of the water 
companythe price set. And one day he called me into his office 
and he said, "Here's the check for the water company. I want you 
to take it down to the Bank of Italy building and deliver it to 
Arthur Tashiera, the attorney for the East Bay Water Company." 
So, I took the check down and I think I probably picked up the 
deed, and that's how the East Bay Water Company purchase was 
accomplished. As he received the check, Mr. Tashiera, a very 
nice man, said to me, "This is a good company; take good care of 
it." Unfortunately for his hopes, the dissolution of the company 
was already well underway. 

I had a couple of jobs extraneous to legal practicethis 
being the early days of the district. Governor Pardee always 
insistedlet me backtrack each month when it came time to 
settle the accounts of the district that is, the bills the 
accounting department would make this long list of bills due: 
O'Shea Construction, one million dollars; Smith Stationery, a 
dollar and a half, and so on. Governor Pardee always insisted 
that this long list be read aloud at the board meeting the whole 
list. Before the meeting, in order to ensure the accuracy of the 
list, I was required to sit down with Kay Simon of the accounting 
department. She would read off the amount she would have the 
stack of invoices in front of her. She would read off the amount 
of each invoice, and I would check the list as to its accuracy on 
the resolution. I always detested that, while the other board 
members fussed and fumed about the reading of the list during 
their meetings, but Governor Pardee always insisted that it must 
be done. 

I well remember that after the district took over the water 
company, there was actually no real boardroom for the board of 
directors. So, an upstairs room was being enlarged for the 
board. During that period, the board meetings were held in the 
commercial office lobby, just inside the entry door of the 
utility district office building. And I can still see the 
secretary of the district reading off this long list of claims 
while customers were paying their bills. And all the other 
members of the board except Pardee were fuming, but he was smugly 
sitting in his chair taking it all in. I think he enjoyed that 

The other job that I didn't care for: the law required 
that and this applied to all public agencies --when they put a 
deposit of funds in a bank, the bank had to put up security, 
which was usually in the form of bonds. Those were then taken by 
the treasurer of the district, Dan Read, and deposited in a safe 





Raines : 

deposit box in the Central Bank. Dan had the key to the box and 
I had been given the combination to the lock on the box. So, I 
would be busy in my office and I would get a call from Dan Read: 
"I have some bonds that I have to put in the safe deposit box," 
or "I want to go to the safe deposit box to take bonds out." So 
I would have to drop whatever I was doing and go with him down to 
the bank to watch him make the substitution and I would then lock 
the box. It showed some faith in me to be given the combination, 
but I was willing to sacrifice the faith. 

When Frank Wentworth succeeded the governor as president of 
the board, he immediately abolished the practice of reading the 
bills and claims at the meetings, and he so changed operations 
that my assistance was no longer needed on the bills and claims. 
A change was also made in the manner the securities at the bank 
were handled. 

So it needed two people to do this. 

I noticed in the scrapbook you gave me the annual report the 
first year you were there, and Mr. Wittschen wrote out an entire 
legal report. Was that always the case? 

In those days it was. Each department made a special report; now 
the reports are just overall- -without any particular department 
being mentioned. Today's annual reports are generalized, not 
departmentalized . 


Outside Interests 

LaBerge: Do you have any hobbies? 

Raines: No. My only outdoor activity was golf, which I had to give up 

because of my age. But I've always beenbefore my sight failed 
--a voracious reader. I had quite a large library. You can 
still see signs of the stacks back in the den. My principal 
reading interest was the westward push from the Missouri River to 
the West. I had bought and read many books, particularly on the 
fur tradethe mountain men activities. And also the covered 
wagons days pushing to the West Coast. My other interest was 


printing. I was always sorry that I never was a printer. I had 
a very fine collection of limited edition booksbeautifully 
printedthe best ones being by the Grabhorn Press in San 
Francisco. Many other California fine presses were also 
included, as well as great European presses. I also had some 
fine books from the University of California Press. 

LaBerge: Our office has done an oral history of the Grabhorn Press. 1 I 
should bring that the next time for you to look at. 

Raines: Yes, I'd like to see that. I had many of their books, and about 
ten years ago I sold off everything I had to Holmes Bookstore. 

LaBerge: Do you know Rather Press? 2 It was tinyRather. Lois and I 
don't know what her husband's name was. They had a little 
printing press, up in the Oakmore district. 

Raines: In my early years--! thought that I would like our home in the 
Oakland Hills had a large basement, and I always thought that I 
would like to go to a community college and take a course in 
printing and install a little press and hand-print in the 
basement of our house. But that was just another unfulfilled 

[Interview 2: October 4, 1995 ]** 

More on T. P. Wittschen 

Raines: That's always surprised me that I still wound up the way I did, 
involved in water rights at that early time. 

LaBerge: It sounds like you were just looking for any job you could find, 
not necessarily in water rights. 

Raines: That's right. Just by chance. I don't know where we left off. 

Edwin Grabhorn, "Recollections of the Grabhorn Press," an oral 
history conducted in 1967 by Ruth Teiser, Regional Oral History Office, 
University of California, Berkeley, 1968. 

2 See Clifton and Lois Rather, "The Rather Press of Oakland, 
California," an oral history conducted in 1980 by Ruth Teiser, Regional 
Oral History Office, University of California, Berkeley, 1994. 


LaBerge: Well, we left off before the war, but we didn't cover everything 
before the war. We talked a little bit about T. P. Wittschen, 
but I'd like to ask you more about him and about some other 
people you worked with. Why don't we start with him? What was 
he like to work for? 

Raines: Well, with me he was always very pleasant. He could be explosive 
with other people who were working with him. I recall a number 
of situations of that nature. But with me, he was always polite 
and friendly and never critical. 

He was quite active around Oakland at that time. He was a 
member of the Lions Club, and he was also president of the 
Oakland Forum, which was a citywide group which brought cultural 
events to Oaklandwhether it be a lecture hall, a concert, or 
something of that sort once in a while. He was also president of 
the State Bar of California. He was elected at a time when the 
members of the state bar were elected at large, statewide. I 
remember the night of the election: I was at the office of the 
state bar in San Francisco where the votes were being counted, 
watching out for his interests. I had the pleasure toward the 
end of the evening of phoning Mrs. Wittschen to tell her that he 
had been elected. 

LaBerge: Did you help campaign for him, or wasn't that done? 

Raines: No, I didn't do any campaigning, and I don't think he did a lot. 
He might have made a speech here or there, but there wasn't much 
campaigning. His opponent was an attorney in Marin County, whose 
name I don't recall. 

LaBerge: He must have had a statewide name from his work. 

Raines: Yes. He was well regarded, I think, at least among attorneys 
throughout the state for his ability as a trial lawyer. 

LaBerge: Did he get you involved in state bar activities? 

Raines: No, I was a member of a group in the state bar--a committee, I 
guess you'd call it, regarding water rights. Outside of 
attendance at some of those sessions, that was my only activity. 

LaBerge: About how many attorneys do you think did specialize in water 

Raines: Oh, there were quite a few. Getting back to Mr. Wittschen, he 
was born in New York City, but I don't know just when. His 

family moved to Oakland and they settled in West Oakland. I 
never heard of his father, but I knew his mother, and he had two 
sisters. It seems to me that one sister was married to [Robert] 
Gordon Sproul, a former president of the University of 
California. Another sister was a secretary for the [California] 
State Supreme Court. Those items should be checked. His mother, 
at some time during his early years, operated a grocery store in 
her neighborhood in West Oakland. 

LaBerge: So you got to meet the family. 

Raines: Yes, I was just introduced to his mother, and I had met the 

sister who was working for the supreme court, and I may have met 
Mrs. Sproul, but I didn't have any other contact with the family. 
Wittschen attended the local schools in Oakland and went to 
Hastings College of Law in San Francisco before his admission to 
the bar. I think I mentioned in our previous meeting of the 
opinions I wrote for him and about our gatherings before a trial 
to discuss-- 

Writing Briefs for the Trials 

LaBerge: You talked about writing opinions, but not the gatherings before 
the trial; tell me more about that. 

Raines: When a trial was coming up after he had--in his own mind viewed 
the situation, he would call me into his office and explain what 
he thought would be legal problems he would be met with in the 
trial. And also courses that he should pursue in the trial. He 
would ask me then to give an opinion as to those matters that 
might be used against him as well as those that he would want to 
use in his favor. So that meant the accumulation of the volumes 
that I mentioned in our previous conversation- -they were still 
extant in the district up to ten years ago, the last I heard of 

LaBerge: Are there some cases that stand out in your mind that were 
particularly interesting or thorny? 

Raines: No, I was not with him on the big trials. Of course, the water 
rightsthe original district water rights were settled by the 
time I was employed. And there were the big casesthe Kieffer 
condemnation case and the City of Lodi case. In those days, 


Leslie Irving, who was the other assistant attorney, was with him 
on those cases, but perhaps not on the Lodi case. 

LaBerge: With him actually in the courtroom? 

Raines: Yes. 

LaBerge: But did you do the research and opinion writing on them? 

Raines: Not on the Kief far case. I was just coming in when he was busy 
on that. But I did some work on the City of Lodi case. After 
about that time, Irving became the district representative in 
Sacramento- -a lobbyist, if you want to call him that. So, he was 
out of the office a great dealas a matter of fact, he lived up 
there during the legislative sessions. With his departure, I 
came in the picture and after the Lodi case I was in court with 
Mr. Wittschen throughout the trial. I think I mentioned that it 
was my custom every day to take notes as the trial went on. In 
the evenings I would write those notes up; it would be either on 
testimony or legal points. I would turn that over to him before 
the next day's session. 

LaBerge: Do you remember particular issues in any of the Lodi cases? 

Raines: One of the cases I do rememberand this is going back to my 

backgroundthe city of Vallejo wanted to construct a reservoir 
on the headwaters of Suisun Creek, which is just west of 
Fairfield. My uncle, among others, owned ranch property along 
the lower reaches of the creek. And there just began to be 
rumbles of that case, when I spent my early years in Fairfield in 
my uncle's office, involving an amendment to the state 
constitution that tried to wipe out any wasteful use of water. 
That was the principal litigation issue, and I guess it was the 
landowners who attacked the amendment. Right after the case was 
tried- -I've forgotten just who won the case- -it went to the state 
supreme court. And Mr. Wittschen wanted to file a brief arnicas 
curiae, which is a "friend of the court." To do so it was first 
necessary to get permission from the court. So I wrote a very 
lengthy opinion for him on that case, which he incorporated into 
his brief. He asked me if I wanted my name on his brief. But I 
declined because my uncle was one of the parties on the other 
side of the issue. However, it was decided favorably to the 
constitutional provision. 

Getting back to the brief --as I say, I rendered this opinion 
to him which he used the court's decision was favorable to the 
position that he supported. Les Irving said to me after we read 


the court's decision, "The supreme court must have gotten hold of 
your office brief, because they followed exactly the line that 
you had laid out in your opinion." That is really the only case 
of great importance that I recall. There were many minor cases- 
condemnation, local, and things of that nature. 

LaBerge: I read somewhere that you were the expert on condemnation suits. 

Raines: I was once surprised by thatone of the judges of the Contra 

Costa [County] Superior Court said that to somebody, but actually 
my expertise was limited to the office work because it was not in 
the trial field. [As long as I'm passing bouquets to myself, 
here is another one: an Alameda County Superior Court judge once 
told me that I was the best office lawyer in Oakland.] 

LaBerge: Later--! don't want to really jump to the next yearsbut, when 
you became general counsel did you have to go to court, or is 
that when you had Mr. Reilley do the trials? 

Raines: He did almost all of the trials. 
LaBerge: And you still did the office- 
Raines: I did preliminaries. I prepared the papers, filed them and 

appeared in court on motions, demurrers, and so on. But Jack 
Reilley did the heavy work on trials. I can get to that a little 

LaBerge: Did you prefer to do office work than to stand up in court? 

Raines: Yes, I did. Of course, I might have felt differently if I had 
been thrown into a district attorney's office or something like 
that in my infancy as a lawyer, but I never was. So I sat 
through innumerable trials with Mr. Wittschen, but I never had an 
opportunity to take over because he was the attorney. Really, I 
think it's my nature--! 'm not by nature inquisitive, and I think 
I would not have made a good cross-examiner for trial work. 

Leslie Irving 

LaBerge: What do you think helped Mr. Wittschen be so successful in court? 


Raines: He was very aggressive, very outspoken on any issue. And he 

never minded stepping on somebody's toes if he had to. I might 
speak a little bit about Les Irving. 

LaBerge: Good- -I wanted to ask about him and about how long he stayed, 
because you two really came in about the same time. 

Raines: He was employed by the district three months before I was. His 
predecessor had resigned. He was a quiet man, nicely mannered. 
He went to the University of California at Berkeleyhe was a 
member of the Delta Tau Delta fraternity. He was active in 
campus politics and in his senior year he was student body 
president at Berkeley. 

LaBerge: Were you there at the same time? 

Raines: No, he was two years ahead of me. He was raised in West Oakland, 
I think in the same neighborhood where the Wittschen family 
lived. That may have been one of the reasons for his employment 
by Mr. Wittschen. 

After I became the attorney for the district, Les decided to 
leave the district and he resigned to become state inheritance 
tax appraiser in Alameda County and he also engaged in private 
practice. Unfortunately, his appointment was by a Republican 
state controller. But Culbert Olsen, a Democrat, was elected 
governor, and there was a change in the other office from which 
Les had been appointed. And the determination in Sacramento was 
to award the victors by a clean sweep of Republican office 
holders, so he lost his official position. The new appointee was 
a Democrat. So Les practiced in Oakland for several years. 

LaBerge: What kind of law did he practice? 
Raines: General. 

Appointment as General Counsel, 1947 

LaBerge: Were you two rivals for the job, do you think, for chief counsel? 

Raines: Some people seemed to think so, but I never did. After Mr. 

Wittschen 's retirement, and before that too, Les and I could see 
an approaching change. We discussed what we thought was going to 
happen- -particularly what changes would be made in our office, if 



any. As a matter of fact, I always thought an outside attorney 
would be appointed who would have some of the characteristics of 
Mr. Wittschen. However, I never at any time discussed with any 
member of the board my chances to be appointed in Mr. Wittschen' s 
place. I don't know whether Les did or not; I rather doubt if he 

I learned later that I had substantial backing on the 
existing board of directors. The board never got to know Les; he 
was in Sacramento all the time the legislature was in session, 
and here I was as part of my official duties, attending every 
meeting of the board, and representing Mr. Wittschen when he was 
absent. To the best of my recollection, Les never attended a 
board meeting prior to Mr. Wittschen 's retirement. 

One morning I had a telephone call from Leroy K. Hamman, who 
was then president of the board, saying that he would like to see 
me in his office in the Central Bank building in Oakland. So I 
went to see him, and he at that time offered me the position and 
I accepted it. I had made no attempt to try to get it. So 
that's the way it happened. 

[When I returned to my office I phoned my wife and then told 
Les. He had no comment then, nor did he ever discuss the matter 
with me personally. I took office on November 1, 1947. As a 
show of confidence in me, the board immediately raised my salary 
to $800 a month. I had been receiving about $675. I don't think 
that Mr. Wittschen was receiving more than $1,250 or $1,500.]' 

Leslie voluntarily resigned. 

Yes. After I was appointed and after Les had resigned and left 
the office, I felt that we needed to continue our representation 
in Sacramento, and I talked to Les about continuing to represent 
the district there. He told me he would accept, but he wanted a 
fee of $20,000 per session. I reported that to the board, and 
they rejected the offer. So that ended my association with Les. 
The only other time I was close to him was on the day of Mr. 
Wittschen 's funeral services. We were both pallbearers and 
traveled in the same car. I later learned that Les had attempted 
to gain some support in official circles for unseating me. 

Bracketed material was added by Mr. Raines during the editing 
process . 


One night after Les resigned, Mr. Wittschen had a small 
group of local attorneys and Les and me for dinner at his house 
as a farewell party to Les. 

To make the story complete, Mr. Wittschen favored Les. He 
told me that he had nothing against me, but he thought that Les 
was entitled to the position. John Longwell, then chief engineer 
and general manager, later told me that he had backed me before 
the board. 

LaBerge: It's interesting. Do you think Mr. Wittschen represented that to 
the board? 

Raines: Yes, he did, I later learned. He told me he did. I was never 
present when he did, however. [I'd like to close this subject 
with a few words about the relationship that existed between Les 
Irving and me at the district. We worked there together in and 
out of the same office for twenty years. Our personal 
relationship was always a very friendly one throughout those 
years. There was never a harsh or envious word between us. 
There was not even a hint of rivalry between us on the job. Les 
had his own area of official duties and I had mine, and the two 
never conflicted.] 1 


The board appointed Mr. Wittschen attorney emeritus. We 
rented another room and he was with us in the Latham Square 
building. He moved his old desk in with him. When he finally 
left the district, he bought the desk and took it home. I 
consulted with him occasionally. And that's the way it was until 
he finally retired. 

Mr. Wittschen had a son, Ted, Jr., a very nice young man, 
and the apple of his father's eye. At the outbreak of World War 
II, he became an ensign in the U.S. Navy. He was a bow gunnery 
officer on a United States cruiser at the battle of Guadalcanal 
when the Japanese torpedoed the ship- -blew the bow off the 
vessel, and Ted went down with it. His father never got over the 
loss. I continued to be friendly, after Mr. Wittschen' s death, 
with his two daughters . 

'Bracketed material was added by Mr. Raines during the editing 


Sociability and Function of the Board of Directors 

LaBerge: Was there a lot of socializing among your group outside the 
office? It sounds like that, since you got to know people's 
families . 

Raines: There was not a lot of socializing, but some. Really, the 

district in those early days was one big family. I was going to 
get into this part a little later, but anyway, here's a start: 
The board of directors in those days met late in the afternoon 
around four for what they called the "meeting of the Committee of 
the Whole." They went over the agenda, ironed out all the 
problems, and then broke for dinner. After dinner, probably 
around seven-thirty or eight o'clock, they conducted the public 
meeting. The Committee of the Whole was entirely private. That 
would be illegal now with the passage of the Ralph M. Brown Act 
early in the 1950s, which made all closed local public official 
gatherings illegal. 

You mentioned the sociability for these dinner sessions. 
These dinners were usually in public restaurants, but many of the 
times the dinner would be held at a director's home. For 
example, I can remember two dinners at Vice President Grant 
Miller's home in East Oakland; dinners in Berkeley at the homes 
of directors David P. Barrows and Frank Wentworth; a dinner at 
Tom Neilson's home in Kensington; a dinner in Piedmont at the 
home of staff engineer, C. E. Grunsky. So that was an indication 
of the amount of socializing. The guest list at these dinners 
included the five directors, the general manager, the attorney, 
myself, and frequently staff engineer C. E. Grunsky, who was a 
more or less regular attendant at the meetings. 

Of course, the board situation was different in those days. 
The East Bay Municipal Utility District was formed under the 
Municipal Utility District Act 1 passed by the state legislature-- 
I think about 1921. It was sponsored by a civic-minded group, 
the leader of which was Louis Bartlett of Berkeley, who was on 
the original East Bay board. But that act provided then for five 
directorsthere are now sevento serve for four-year terms, 
each to represent wards. While the director represented, wards, 
they were elected at large in the district. And then, to cap it 
all, the law provided that a director should receive a 

'Municipal Utility District Act, 44th Leg. Sess., Cal. Stat. 

ch. 220 




Raines : 

compensation of ten dollars per meeting attended, not to exceed 
two meetings a month. And if there were any more than two 
meetingsno ten dollars. So that meant that there really were 
few strangers on the board; they were all successful in 
businesses or other fields and had no particular axes to grind. 
And they were able to work together in geniality and for a 

And they were electednot appointed? 

Yes. If there was a resignation or departure during the term 
such as death or illness, and there was a vacancy on the board, 
the board had the power of making an appointment. To be elected 
to the board required that person to circulate and file a 
petition with signatures of the voters. It seems to me that the 

law required five hundred signatures on the petition, 
it was five hundred or some equally large number. 

I'm sure 

This is a good spot to talk about the board of directors and what 
their function was. What did you see as their function? 

The Municipal Utility District Act really was wide open for many 
kinds of activity. There were times when there would be a slight 
movement for the district to take over the Pacific Gas and 
Electric Company powerlines. There was a push for the district 
to take over the Key System interurban lines between the East Bay 
and San Francisco. Of course, the district later got into the 
park and recreation business, and all of those things would be 
done under the terms of the Municipal Utility District Act, plus 
some minor amendments probably. So that's really a quite open 
statute, as far as activity is concerned. 

Memories of Governor George Pardee 

Pickhandle" Pardee 

LaBerge: What are your memories of Governor Pardee? 

Raines: George C. Pardee is one of my heroes. I have great fondness-the 
fondest memories of him. To go back, he studied medicine in, I 
think, the Midwest. He had postgraduate study in Europe; his 
specialty was the eye. He practiced medicine in Oaklandthis is 


all hearsay with me. He became active, I think as his father 
was, in Oakland in local politics. He was mayor of the city of 
Oakland. One incident I remember hearing about involved the 
ferry line that the Southern Pacific Railroad ran between San 
Francisco and up the estuary to the foot of Broadway. I think 
that was called the nickel ferry, as I remember hearing about it, 

Raines : 


Raines : 

Because it cost a nickel? 

I think that was it, yes. The railroad company insisted that it 
owned the land surrounding the landing area of the ferry. And 
the city objected, and refused to recognize that. So one day the 
railroad company erected a high wooden fence around the landing 
area there at the foot of Broadway in order to block off any 
attempts by the city to take control. City Mayor Pardee gathered 
his forces. He collected a group of men, and they marched down 
to the area at the foot of Broadway and demolished the fence. It 
was never rebuilt by the railroad. In my day in Oakland, a man 
named Phil Riley published a scurrilous weekly newspaper called 
the Saturday Press. It was claimed that it had the largest 
unpaid circulation in the county. No one wanted to be seen 
buying one, but some courageous person would buy one and then it 
would be passed along to others. 

Like the National Enquirer at the grocery store? 
them, [laughter] 

No one buys 

Yes. So Riley 's specialty was attacking public officials. When 
Dr. Pardee was on the board, in almost every issue there would be 
an article involving the district in which Dr. Pardee would 
always be named as Pickhandle Pardee, claiming that was what he 
and his group used to break down the fence. In my presence, Dr. 
Pardee said they weren't pickhandles, they were axehandles. He 
treated Riley as a joke. But at board meetings, members would 
frequently twit him about Pickhandle Pardee. And he would laugh 
it all off. 

Board of Directors President 

Raines: Pardee was governor at the time of the San Francisco earthquake, 
and moved his state office from Sacramento to the city hall in 
Oakland where he kept his finger on events as they developed. He 
was on the board as president when I arrived, and he continued as 


such until his retirement. We had a very pleasant relationship. 
He was at the district almost every day and I frequently called 
on him, sometimes just to chat, sometimes if we had some business 
that he as president of the board had to handle. 

He called me "Judge." Herb Nelson, a district employee, was 
the chauffeur of the district's only office car--a high, open-air 
Lincoln sedan--and along in 1928 Nelson for some reason began to 
call me "Judge." He chauffered Dr. Pardee around to various 
parts of the district where work was going on and also between 
his residence and his office. And I think in the course of those 
trips, Dr. Pardee must have picked up the "Judge" from him, but 
he always called me "Judge." That continued- -being used by his 
successor, Frank Wentworth, but fortunately it died at that 
point. Otherwise I was called "Hal" throughout the district. 

LaBerge: Why did Herb Nelson call you "Judge"? 

Raines: I don't know. 

LaBerge: Did he chauffeur you to the courthouse or things like that? 

Raines: No, no. He never chauffered me--I was too lowly on the scale to 
get a ride in the Lincoln. Really, Nelson picked it up from a 
man whose name I don't recall- -John something or other- -who was 
the first purchasing agent of the district. He was the one who 
started the "Judge" thing. Most people called Pardee "Doctor." 
I always called him "Governor," and he seemed to like that, so I 
never stopped. 

At board meetings, particularly at 5 12- 16th Street, there 
was a long table for the board. Dr. Pardee sat at the south end, 
the general manager for the district sat at the north end, the 
other directors sat around on the sides, and the attorney always 
had a seat at the table. Mr. Wittschen was frequently very vocal 
with the board. He expressed his opinions in a forceful manner. 
Most of the time they agreed. Very few times was his opinion 
disregarded. But at the meetings, when he was away on business 
or vacation or such, I also took his position at the table. But 
when he was present at the meeting, I sat in a chair behind him 
and was available to whisper in his ear or be sent out to collect 
a document or something like that. 

Governor Pardee had an impish streak. In a situation where 
Mr. Wittschen had been vociferous on a problem, after the 
discussion was over or near its end the Governor would, with a 
sly grin, say, "What do you think about that, Judge?" Which 


certainly put me on the spot with my employer sitting right in 
front of me. [laughter] My responses were always brief and very 
diplomatic, but he had his joke on the lawyers, and he never 
pressed me. Also, occasionally with a sly grin, he joked with me 
about my native city, Vallejo; he always gave the city name with 
complete Spanish pronunciation. 

One other time I remember going over to see him one day, and 
he was sitting there at the table. And when I got within five or 
six feet of him he said, "Stop! I want to test your peripheral 
vision." He had a long yellow pencil he held up in his hand-- 
"Now turn your head to the right, now turn your head to the 
left." He concluded my peripheral vision was pretty good. 

LaBerge: He was no longer practicing, is that correct? 

Raines: No, no, he had been long inactive in his profession when I knew 

He was almost a chain smoker. I guess it was part of the 
secretary's duty to keep full the canister of Bull Durham tobacco 
on the table in front of him. And he rolled his own cigarettes 
all the time. 

LaBerge: During the meetings? 

Raines: No, as a matter of fact I never thought of this before, but I 
don't recall him smoking during a meeting. Nor did any of the 
other directors that I recall. 

Dr. Pardee, in later years at the district, occasionally 
produced a message to the public that was printed and inserted in 
the bills sent out to the utility district customers- -how much of 
it he wrote I don't know. But they sounded like him so I think 
he had a heavy hand at least in constructing them. But in 
addition to that he had his own special list of correspondents; 
he sent out typewritten letters to this group, I would guess, 
about the district. That was sort of a joke among the members of 
the board. No one on the board nor did anyone I know around the 
district ever see one of these letters; they were entirely 
secret. The board members knew of them, and would joke with him 
about it at the meetings. I remember once the governor 
announcing, "What do you know, I had another reader of my letters 
today. That makes fifteen now!" He was a fiscal conservative 
and wherever possible he insisted on economy in the district's 
operations. In board discussions on financial matters his 


standard quote was "Many nickels make a muckle." I suspected 
that this came from Charles Dickens. 

The Park Issue 

In his actions at the board, he never pounded the table or 
raised his voice; he guided things smoothly and quietly. He 
would let the discussion range between the other members and the 
general manager and he would interject a remark now and then if 
necessary. He never tried to really force an issue before the 
board, but in a subtle way he was always able to make his 
preference known. 

The only time that I can remember seeing him reach a 
positive objection on a subject was in regard to the park issue 
on the district's watershed lands. There was a group around 
Oakland that would be called environmentalists now, who thought 
that the lands in the East Bay hills which the district had taken 
over from the old East Bay Water Company should be used for parks 
and recreation. And they suggested that the district engage in 
that operation. 

One of the local leaders of that position was Major Charles 
Tilden of Alameda, who was quite vocal on the subject. I don't 
know if Dr. Pardee and Tilden had past relationships or not, but 
Dr. Pardee was quite outspoken in his feelings about Major Tilden 
and his proposal. I don't know whether they ever got together or 
not. Of course, the lands ultimately were opened up. At one 
meeting at which I was present, Pardee announced that if the 
board decided to go into the recreation business he would resign 
from the board. He was opposed to any outside project that, in 
his opinion, would draw the district's complete attention from 
the water business. So the board didn't proceed; they dropped 
the subject. The last meeting that he attended before his 
resignation all the board members stood to shake his hand. 


I came to him, we shook hands, and he said to me, "Well, 
Judge, this is goodbye. If we never meet again, it won't be my 
fault." Unfortunately, I never saw him again; he died not too 
many months later. I have a real fondness for him. His funeral 
service was conducted in the Scottish Rite Auditorium in Oakland 
before a packed house. 


LaBerge: How old was he at that time? 

Raines: I think he was in his late seventies, I don't know. He was not 
robust at this time; he was a little on the sickly side. There 
were times when he couldn't make it to the boardroom, and the 
Committee of the Whole meetings would be held at his housethe 
old Victorian down on llth Street and Castro in West Oakland. 
Incidentally, Jack Reilley and I a few months ago took a tour of 
the old house. It was my first trip back since my early days at 
the district. It's now a private museum. So that just about 
winds up my Pardee story. 


LaBerge: Could I just go back for a minute to the East Bay Regional Parks? 
Those watershed lands were what you sold, I think, to the parks, 
is that correct? 

Raines: Yes. 

LaBerge: Why was Governor Pardee so opposed to that whole issue? 

Raines: He had a mindset on the water situation, the water problem, and 
as he often expressed it, anything that diverted the district's 
attention and strength from the water situation was not to be 
tolerated. It was just that feeling, I think. 

LaBerge: What was the public reaction, do you think, to either the 
district holding more land or selling it to the parks? 

Raines: I think the people were wide open for it. There really wasn't 
any objection. I guess that was it. There was some public 
objection expressed that the district received compensation from 
the park district. The district's answer to that was that it had 
issued bonds for the acquisition of the lands and was still 
paying off those bonds. 

LaBerge: Did you get to know Major Tilden at all? 

Raines: No. As a matter of fact, I think I saw him once or twice. I 
knew his son Charley pretty well. 


Public Relations 

LaBerge: Tell me how did Dr. Pardee and Mr. Wittschen get along? 


Raines: Very well. He appreciated Mr. Wittschen's accomplishments. The 
governor got along with everybody he wished to. I think he may 
have had political enemies around town, like Phil Riley. But he 
got along well with everybody. He was friendly with Joseph 
Knowland, the publisher of the Oakland Tribune, which I think was 
a help for the district, because the Tribune always supported our 
bond issues and projects of that nature. 

LaBerge: How do you think the fact that Governor Pardee was president of 
the board helped the East Bay Utility District? 

Raines: I think it was a wonderful thing. I don't think the district 

could have gotten off as well with anybody else. I remember when 
I first went to the board meetings, fresh on the job, there was 
up before the board the matter of paying the premiums on various 
insurance policies that the district carried. One member in 
particular was strong for picking an individual to handle the 
insurance. Pardee criticized that strictly as partisanship, and 
as a result of his position the local insurance agents formed the 
Oakland Association of Insurance Agents, which represented a 
great number of insurance agents throughout the district. That 
association then handled all the insurance, and the premiums are 
distributed among all the members of the insurance association. 

LaBerge: So it was fair. 

Raines: Yes. He kept the district on its course. One of his favorite 

statements was a warning to the other members of the board of the 
day when the "predatory politicians"--that was his language- - 
would take over the district, and for the board to be wary of 
that possibility and its actions. 

For a long time I've wanted Pardee 's story to be told. No 
one has done it, and I hope this will be a step along the way. I 
don't know anything of his record as governor of California- -but 
I think he had some opposition, because he only served one term. 
After he came to the district, there was some opposition that 
developed from private utilities in the area and in the state--! 
felt it in the legislatureit being a matter of private 
ownership versus public ownership. Pardee was always a strong 
public ownership man, up to a certain point. He, along with the 
other members of the board, turned down projects I previously 
mentioned, such as taking over the Key System transit and getting 
into the power business. As far as water was concerned, he was a 
hundred percent public ownership. 


Arthur P. Davis, General Manager and Chief Engineer 

Raines: Getting back to my employment--backtracking--in July 1928 

after I had been on the job for a year, one day I received in the 
office mail an ornate document signed by [Arthur] A. P. Davis, 
the general manager and chief engineer, announcing my appointment 
as law clerk. I had never considered the name of the job I had; 
all I was interested in was the job. But the law clerk matter 
made me think a bit; I regarded myself as assistant attorney 
because I had taken a spot previously occupied by an assistant 
attorney. When Mr. Wittschen spotted the document, he ordered it 
sent back immediately to Mr. Davis. He said, "Davis didn't make 
your appointment; I made your appointment!" So it rested in the 
district files until I retired in 1966 when it was sent back to 
me along with some other memorabilia. 

LaBerge: I saw it in your scrapbook, and I was surprised that you were 
called a law clerk. 

Raines: The best part of that document, however, was the announcement 

that my salary was $225 a month. In other words, up one hundred 
dollars over the year I had been with the district. To me at 
least, it announced that Mr. Wittschen was satisfied with my 

LaBerge: Who else went to the board meetings from the employees' side, 
besides you andwas it Arthur P. Davis, was he the general 
manager then? 

Raines: Yes. 

LaBerge: And Mr. Wittschen. Did anyone else- 
Raines: The secretary was in the room. At 5 12- 16th Street, the 

secretary's office was in a corner of the boardroom. He didn't 
actually participate in the meetings, but he was available. And 
there were no others regularly present at the meetings that is, 
the meetings of the the Committee of the Whole. The board or the 
general manager would frequently call in an engineer or the 
treasurer of the district or some official for information. 
Staff engineer C. E. Grunsky was frequently at these meetings 

LaBerge: And at that time the general manager was also the chief engineer. 
Is that correct? 


Raines: Yes. 

LaBerge: Why don't you tell me about Arthur P. Davis and your memories of 

Raines: Well, he didn't serve too long [1923-1929]. 

LaBerge: Actually, I'm looking at the dates; I see he didn't. Frank Hanna 
was the next one [1929-1934]. 

Raines: Yes. Davis didn't serve too long. He was a forceful man, very 

active. Other than that, I really don't have anything special to 
say about him. There was one unfortunate incident that occurred 
after he resigned. Frank Hanna was his successor, and Hanna did 
a great job in making the transfer of the facilities between East 
Bay Water Company and East Bay MUD, and also in the erection of 
the Pardee Dam. But the dam projects had been worked out during 
Mr. Davis 's tenure, and at the dedication of the Pardee Dam a 
bronze plaque was installed and Mr. Davis 's name was not 
recognized on the plaque; Mr. Banna's name was. Mrs. Davis was a 
resident of Piedmont--and this was after Mr. Davis 's deathand 
she conducted quite a campaign to have something done about 
getting Mr. Davis 's name on Pardee Dam. Finally the board 
decided to install another plaque that mentioned Mr. Davis ' s 
contribution, but Mrs. Davis was quite upset about the failure to 
include Mr. Davis 's name on the original plaque. 

LaBerge: Because he was a famous engineer, wasn't he? 

Raines: Oh, he was real famous. That's why today there's an Arthur 

Powell Davis Dam on the Colorado River. He left the district to 
go to Russia--! think it was the Ukraine or some place in 
southern Russia, on a large irrigation project. He had been the 
head of the Bureau of Reclamation of the federal government, as 
was also employed his successor, Hanna. And his successor, John 
Longwell, and a number of other engineers on the original Pardee 
Dam crew were ex-reclamation bureau employees. Bob Kennedy, 
later chief engineer, was another one. 

LaBerge: How much involvement did you have with any of the engineering or, 
say, visiting Pardee Dam to look out for-- 

Raines: I had practically none with the work. Except when they got into 
a legal problem. That was the only time the legal department was 
involved. [However, I knew them all well and made many visits to 
Pardee and other projects during and before construction.] 

Cash Payments and National Banks 

LaBerge: So would you have to go up and inspect a site, or anything like 

Raines: Oh, yes. I remember walking in the canyon where Pardee Dam was 
later constructed. Mr. Wittschen was a great tourist as far as 
the district was concerned. Every once in a while he would come 
into my office and say, "Oh, let's go for a ride, Hal." Then he 
would go to look at some project being constructed around the 
district. It was amusing- -after the Kieffer case, the district 
had to pay a quarter million or a half a million or something 
like that. Mr. Wittschen felt that the statute, or maybe it's 
the constitution of California, involving condemnation specified 
cash. So the money for the Kieffer property was to be paid in 
cash in Sacramento to the attorney for Kieffer. Wittschen took 
along the award in cash and somehow he had dug up an old nickel- 
plated revolver which he stuck in his pocket. So Wittschen, the 
bag of money, and the revolver went to Sacramento. 

LaBerge: Did you go along with him? 

Raines: No, I guess Irving was on duty then. Another problemhe was a 
stickler as far as legal language was concerned. The law was 
that--I think it still is--that if a bank secures a deposit of 
district funds, the bank must give to the district security for 
the amount of the depositthe security being bonds, usually. I 
think I mentioned that matter the other day when I mentioned my 
having the combination to the safe deposit box where the bonds 
were located. 

But, Wittschen had the idea through--! don't knowthe 
language of the law or legal decision, that the district's money 
could not be safely deposited in a national bank, with the result 
that the Bank of America, then the Bank of Italy, and other 
national banks around Oakland were continually harassing him on 
the subject, but he never budged. 

When he retired and I became attorney, they began to work me 
over. I looked the situation over; I talked with Sacramento 
Municipal Utility District attorneys and other public attorneys, 
and they were all depositing funds in the national bank. I no 
longer felt that I could stand out alone, so I gave approval to 
the deposit of the funds. 

LaBerge: So previously they were deposited in state banks? 


Legislative Dealings and S. C. Masterson 


LaBerge : 



Yes. And now getting back to this matter of the board of 
directors elections and the nominating petition that had to be 
presented bearing what I think was five hundred names: there was 
a feeling in political circles around Oakland, and even in 
Sacramento, that that was pretty tough. Members of the 
legislature only needed fifty or twenty-five signatures, and I 
think only similar numbers for some federal requirements. So 
when S. C. Masterson of Richmond was elected to the assembly, one 
of his first tasks was to attack that signature position. I was 
lobbying for the district in those days, and I had the job of 
trying to convince committee members that there should not be a 
change. But I never had a chance- -the committee turned me down. 
The result was that the five hundred number was wiped out , and I 
don't know just what the number is now, but it was sharply 

The committee turned you down, 
they ? 

Would they listen to you, or did 

Oh, they would always listen; they might shut you off but, 
really, I didn't have anything very lengthy to talk about on that 
particular issue. 

Masterson was a gadfly for me in the legislature. He always 
seemed to have a bill that had something to do with changing 
things in the district. One time he even induced the legislature 
to send a special committee for a public hearing in Richmond on 
certain operations of the district. I don't know now just what 
was involved. But the hearing was held; the committee was there, 
Masterson was there, and some of the officials of the district 
were there. I represented the district, and in my closing 
remarks I said something that prompted Masterson to get on his 
feet and to claim that I was insulting him personally. I made a 
diplomatic apology, and the hearing ended. The committee reached 
no decision, and never published any reports; it died on the 
vine. He always had something in mind. 

And is this because Richmond was a part of the district by this 

Raines: Yes. Richmond was not one of the original city members of the 
utility district. Later he became a superior court judge in 


Martinez. Jack Reilley tried a case before him. Jack said Judge 
Masterson treated him very well, so he harbored no resentment 
evidently from our altercations. 

Legal Department Secretaries 

LaBerge: Anything more about Mr. Wittschen? Like things that he 

established in the general counsel's office that you continued, 
or things you learned from him as far as running the office? 

Raines: No, we carried on just as usual. Mr. Wittschen was my mentor; I 
think he made a lawyer out of me. 

I had a good staff. The ladies the secretarieswere 
grand. I think I mentioned earlier that the district's first 
office was at 1924 Broadway. On December 8, 1928, when the East 
Bay Water Company building at 5 12- 16th Street was taken over, 
there just wasn't room for the legal department after the 
engineers, accountants, and business officers had taken their 
places . So we moved into the Latham Square building which was 
right next door to the old East Bay Water Company building. We 
had four and a half rooms on the top floor. Once we had to move 
down one floor to let Kaiser Engineering take the entire top 
floor. But we bounced back and forth from the Latham Square 
building to the district building office mail floating all the 

I mentioned a half-room; that was my office. It was between 
Mr. Wittschen 's large corner office and Les Irving' s, who had an 
almost equally large room. And I had this little space in 
between; there was just room for a small desk and, at most, two 
chairs. I got along fine; I didn't complain. One room was the 
library and another was the entry and secretary's space. 

LaBerge: The legal department had its own secretary? 
Raines: Yes. We always had two. 
LaBerge: And was one Lila Wagnor? 

Raines: Yes, but Ethel Mayon was the first secretary when we were at 1924 
Broadway. She moved up to the Latham Square building when the 
department went there. I remember she was an elderly woman. She 
had formerly worked for the Key System legal department. I 


remember her last day at work. I took office on November 1, and 
she retired at the end of October, and she said to me, "I'm so 
sorry that I won't be working for you as attorney." It was at 
that time that Lila Wagnor came into the office. 

LaBerge: So this is 1947? 

Raines: Yes. 

LaBerge: So you had sort of learned under Ethel, is that-- 

Raines: Well, not exactly. Lila was really a great secretary: 

knowledgeable, active, helpful. She suffered a health problem 
and retired early from the district; that was after we moved down 
to West Oakland. 

Raines : 

LaBerge ; 

Raines : 
Raines : 

I look with astonishment at some of the work those women did- -for 
example, that lengthy letter to Harvey Banks that you have 
noticed in the state bulletin, some eighteen pages, was all typed 
out by one of these women. 

And that was before word processing and erasable papers. It was 
the carbon copies. 


I imagine they learned quite a bit of law in the process. 

Yes. Lila Wagnor was a fine legal secretary. She worked hard 
and was always cheerful. Her successor was Myrtle Degnan. She 
had been employed elsewhere in the district before coming to the 
legal department. She ran the outer office very well and was a 
tireless and loyal helper to me. With Myrtle was "Cherry" Dixon. 
Her first name was Cherokee, shortened to "Cherry." She was a 
very good legal secretary with a legal background. 

Aside on Frank Howard and the Campfire Girls 

Raines: Things livened up in the office when Frank E. Howard arrived as 

an assistant attorney. He was and still is a most active person. 
Jack Reilley became his mentor and taught him the business. I 
first knew Frank--! think I've told you some of this beforewhen 


my wife was active in the Campfire Girls organization. One of 
their big projects each year was to open a coffee shop at the 
Oakland Flower Show, which was a huge event in Oakland in earlier 
days, held at the Oakland Auditorium. It was a typical coffee 
shop, and it had a snack bar also. I remember--it must have been 
when Frank was in high school- -one day Frank and I ran the snack 
bar all day. 

LaBerge: Was he recruited by his mother or something like that? 

Raines: Yes. So was I recruited by my wife. In addition to that one 

day, I was a busboy with other fathers. I cleared off tables and 
swept floors. We all assisted in the Campfire movement. 


[Interview 3: October 18, 1995 ]## 

Formation of Special District //I 

Raines: The East Bay cities, right from their beginnings, poured their 
raw sewage directly into San Francisco Bay. And that created a 
terrible situation. It became particularly noticeable when the 
present interstate highway 80 was constructed along the 
waterfront of Berkeley and Emeryville. Especially when the tide 
was out and the mudflats were exposed, there was always this 
terrific stench. The public began to realize the problem, and 
there were groups trying to do something about it. Along about 
1940--maybe late thirties and into the late forties approaches 
were made, principally by the city of Oakland, for the district 
to take over the problem. The board of directors of the district 
flatly refused to get into the sewage disposal business. 

However, the clamor continued, and an Oakland assistant city 
attorney, Homer Buckley, got active in the problem. He was a 
friend of mine since our days together at Boalt Hall School of 
Law. At that time, our representative in Sacramento was Les 
Irving. Buckley developed a bill that would put the district 
into the sewage disposal business whether the district liked it 
or not. He took the bill to Sacramento, and it was introduced--! 
don't remember by whom--in the legislature, and began to move. 
Les Irving told the district officials that the bill had every 
chance of passage. And it had features that would be 
objectionable to the utility district. He suggested that instead 
of fighting the bill, the district work with Buckley to develop a 
bill that would be acceptable to the district, and then the 
district go ahead and take over the operation. 

The bill, as amended, was passed and it provides for the 
creation of special districts for sewage treatment purposes 
within the boundaries of the utility district. It puts the 
utility district in full operation and control. Six of the 
cities within the utility district voted to create Special 
District #1 under the bill. 


LaBerge: How many cities were in the district at that point? 

Raines: Oh, there were maybe eight or ten. The special district 

stretched along the bayfront from El Cerrito to Alameda and 
included the larger cities of Oakland, Berkeley, and Alameda. 
After voting themselves into this special district, a bond issue 
was proposed and passed for the development of the sewage 
disposal system. The system consisted of building large 
pipelines called interceptors along the waterfronts of Alameda, 
Oakland, Berkeley, Emeryville, Albany, and El Cerrito. The 
cities continued to maintain and operate their sewers as they 
always hadthat is, to individual homes and businesses. They 
would carry the material, then, to the interceptors, where the 
interceptors picked it up and carried the material to a treatment 
plant located near the east end of the Bay Bridge. The city of 
Oakland filed a suit against the district, claiming that the 
district should pay the cost of tying these city collection 
sewers into the interceptors. There was a brief trial in the 
superior court in Oakland, and the judgment was in favor of the 
district. This meant that the cities had to pay the cost of 
connecting their sewers to the interceptors. So things got 
underway- -every thing was held up during World War II--and it was 
in the late forties that construction began on the interceptors. 

I was involved in several problems. The first one concerned 
the location of the south end of the Alameda interceptor and a 
pumping plant in connection with it. I don't know just why I was 
brought in on it, maybe it was because the city attorney was in 
at the other end. Anyway, we met several times at the site, and 
worked out that problem there. 

Negotiations with the U.S. Maritime Commission 

LaBerge: Who was the city attorney? 
Raines: I don't remember. 

Moving west, the Alameda interceptor was designed to pass 
along Webster Street in Alameda, near the south end of the 
Oakland Estuary tube. The line would pass under property that 
was formerly owned and operated by the Bethlehem Shipyard Company 
for the construction of ships. The property, during World War 
II, was taken over by the U.S. Maritime Commission, which owned 
it at the time the interceptor problem came up. I don't remember 
what discussions there were, if any, between the district and the 
local representative of the commission to secure an easement over 


Raines : 

this property for the interceptor. Anyway, if there had been 
talks about it, they had ceased, and one day the general manager 
called me in and said he thought it would be a good idea if I 
went to Washington, D.C., and talk to the Maritime Commission. 

I was in Washington, D.C., for the better part of a week, 
negotiating with the attorneys for the Maritime Commission. 
Before I left, I had told my friend, state Senator Arthur Breed, 
that I was going to Washington and what my mission was. He said 
he knew well the chief of the Maritime Commission--! think he was 
a man from Marin Countyand he gave me a personal message to 
deliver to him. When I arrived in Washington, I had an interview 
with the commissioner--he was very nicebut he said the matter 
was out of his hands, and it was in the hands of the lawyers for 
the commission. So he introduced me to the lawyers, and I got to 
work. Every time I met, I would be confronted by three lawyers, 
and the proposal was hung up because they would not grant an 
outright easement; they wanted restricted use of the property by 
the district. 

As the days dragged on, that was what we haggled over until 
finally, toward the end of the week, I went to see the lawyers 
again, and I was presented with a signed document. The chief 
attorney said, "Here it is. It's all you're going to get. You 
had better go home." I accepted the ultimatum. 

In other words, the district got an easement with restricted use? 

Yes. The line has been in operation for over fifty years, and 
I've never heard of any problems arising in connection with its 

I have one poignant memory of that trip. I was stuck in 
Washington over a weekend, and the University of California 
football team was playing the University of Pennsylvania in 
Berkeley on Saturday. I was staying at the old Willard Hotel, 
and I settled down in my room with a small libation and watched 
the game on TV. The weather in Washington was cold and dreary, 
and here on the screen in front of me was the beautiful Berkeley 
sunshine at my old stamping ground: Memorial Stadium. I think 
Cal won. 

Southern Pacific Negotiations 

Raines: Now, moving across the estuary almost at eyesight to the south 
interceptor, which ran along the estuary and then out to the 


treatment plant, a problem arose with the Southern Pacific 
Railroad. The line was designed to pass in front of the Southern 
Pacific Railroad station at the foot of Broadway in Oakland. The 
railroad tracks, which were also used by Western Pacific, were 
constructed in front of the station. Their location was actually 
in a public street. The land people of the district were unable 
to work out with the Southern Pacific a satisfactory solution. 
The problem was not to move the tracks, but it was going to cost 
the district extra money to build under and around the tracks. 
The district's position was that the railroad company should pay 
this extra cost. 

One day I received a telephone call from the attorney for 
the Southern Pacific, suggesting a conference in his office in 
San Francisco. I agreed to that, and on the appointed day, I 
took with me Robert Kennedy, who was then the chief engineer of 
the district. In the office, we were confronted not only by the 
attorney for the Southern Pacific, but the attorney for the 
Western Pacific, and the Santa Fe Railways. So we talked along 
and didn't get anyplace until I finally said, "Well, I'm going to 
file a condemnation suit," and the attorney for the Southern 
Pacific said, "You can't do that; you have to get permission 
first from the Interstate Commerce Commission." So the 
conference broke up on that statement. 

When I got back to the office, I went to work on the law 
books, and sure enough, there was a federal statute that no suit 
--such as a condemnation suit--could be filed against an 
interstate carrier until permission was first granted by the 
Interstate Commerce Commission. After that, I had a conference 
with Mr. Longwell and Mr. Kennedy, and we decided the district 
had better pay the costs. It was not excessive, relative to the 
cost of the entire project. A hearing before the Interstate 
Commerce Commission, plus if we were successful therea 
condemnation suit against the railroad would be very costly and 
would have taken years to complete. So that would mean the 
stoppage of work on the south interceptor and it might jeopardize 
the whole project. So the district decided to foot the bill. 
That ended that problem. 

Golden Gate Fields Negotiations 

LaBerge: Had you ever had to make any applications to the Interstate 
Commerce Commission for anything else? 


Raines: No. I had had no relationship whatever with them. 

And moving along to the north interceptor- -the line was 
designed to run from El Cerrito along the bayfront to the 
treatment plant. The projected line was adjacent to the west 
side of the interstate 80 right of way. In the city of Albany, a 
large horserace track was in existence, and the line was designed 
to extend along the eastern frontage of the racetrack property. 

LaBerge: Is this Golden Gate Fields? 

Raines: Yes. The land department was unable to reach any agreement for 
an easement--it was quite a long stretch. And so I filed a 
condemnation suit against the track corporation and secured a 
court order for immediate possession and use. So construction 
went ahead. The suit dragged along, and it got to the point 
where I had to start moving it. Those movements brought a 
response from Frank Richards, an Oakland attorney who was the 
attorney for the track. He was a friend of mine; we had had a 
good relationship over a number of years. One day he called me 
and said, "The board of directors of the corporation running the 
track is meeting there on a certain date; why don't you come out 
and talk to them? Maybe we can settle this matter." So I went 
out on the appointed day and was introduced to the board by Mr. 
Richards, and started my talk about the subject at hand. I was 
interrupted by the chairman of the board, who was a well-known 
ex-state official. He entered into a virulent attack on the 
utility district which had no relation whatever to the subject at 
hand. I listened in silence for a couple of minutes and then 
picked up my papers and walked out. 

LaBerge: Who was the official? 
Raines: I can't remember. 

So, again matters dragged a little while, and not too long 
after that I had another call from Frank Richards, and he 
apologized for what had happened. He said, "There's a race 
meeting going on out there. I have a box; why don't you come out 
and have lunch with me, and we'll sit in the box and watch the 
races and see what we can do?" So I went out, and I brojught 
along with me Hub [Herbert J.] Wickman, who was the land agent of 
the district, and one of his assistants--! think it was Lee 
Jorgenson. We had lunch with Mr. Richards, and then all repaired 
to his box. The races began, and Wickman and Jorgenson got up a 
couple of times to make bets on the races, but all the time we 
were talking. Before the end of the racing program, we had 
settled the matter among ourselves. Later, the settlement was 
confirmed by the racetrack board. 




About how long did that whole process take, 
the time you filed the condemnation suit? 

do you think, from 

Oh, it's a pure guess: six months maybe. We weren't in any 
hurry, because we had the court order for immediate possession 
and use, and the construction was going right ahead. This is the 
only problem I ever settled at a race track. 

Right of Condemnation and Other Legal Issues 

LaBerge: For the record, for people who don't know about condemnation 

suits, could you say something about the issues involved, or why 
the district had rights to condemn that property? 

Raines: The right of condemnation, the right of eminent domain, is given 
by law to public agencies, and even to some private utilities, 
like PG&E, but mostly the power is held by governmental agents. 
The California law has this provision for securing court orders 
for immediate possession and use. In exercising the latter 
power, the law also requires the posting of a bond or cash to 
protect the landowner. For instance, you might file a suit, and 
it might drag on, as some of ours did, and sometimes it is 
dismissed, and meanwhile the landowner has been left unprotected 
with expense and time. So the cash or bond is frequently in a 
minimal amount. The landowner always complains that it's not 
enough. I had to have a statement from the land agent as to the 
supposed value of the property or other evidence to show the 
judge. Sometimes the landowner asked for a formal hearing by the 
judge. I remember one such instance, in Martinez, with the 
attorney Frank Bray, later a justice on the appeal court. 

LaBerge: In any of this negotiation in just setting up the special 

district, did you have to go to the board and present what you 
were going to do, or did you and Mr. McFarland, or you and Mr. 
Longwell decide this is what we need to do? 

Raines: These matters were always handled at the management level. 

LaBerge: When you said that Homer Buckley drew up the original bill for 

the legislature, and then the district helped to amend that, were 
you involved in the rewriting? 

Raines: No, Les Irving handled that. 

LaBerge: So this happened, then, maybe while Mr. Wittschen was still 
general counsel? 


Raines: Yes. That was pretty near the breaking point. The special 

district amendments were passed in 1941; Special District #1 was 
formed in 1944. Construction materials were unavailable until 
well after the end of World War II in 1945. I became attorney in 
November 1947, so most of these events I have mentioned to you 
happened after 1947 when I was the attorney. 

So the project was a complete success; it cleared up, for 
health purposes, the waterfront there, and the stench has been 
removed. The governments of Oakland, Berkeley, and Emeryville 
particularly, were very embarrassed by that previous situation 
during the 1939 World's Fair on Treasure Island: there were so 
many visitors to the area, and so many of them had to pass 
through this stench before they reached the exposition. 

LaBerge: Now in the original utility act bill in the twenties, wasn't the 
district empowered to do this? 

Raines: I think the district could have gone ahead if the board were so 
inclined. It might have required some minor amendments to the 
act, but the Municipal Utility District Act is very broad. It 
gives the directors power to go into all kinds of activities, and 
this could have been one. 

LaBerge: How did the directors in general feel about this? 

Raines: They were resigned to their fate. After it was decided to go 
ahead, they all got on with it. 

LaBerge: Does any of this have to do with, for instance, the community of 
Canyon? I know that part of the watershed is in Canyon, and 
there was some controversy over their sewage or other watersheds. 
Or is that a different issue? 

Raines: That was entirely separate. What we have been talking about just 
involved the cities along the bay. Speaking of Canyon, there was 
organized in recent years the large central Contra Costa sanitary 
district that covers the cities around there. Canyon might be 
included in that. I know it includes Moraga. 

The Land Department 

LaBerge: You mentioned people in the land department at the district. Can 
you tell me who was in the land department and what they did? 


Raines: Hub--I guess his full name was Herbert, but we all knew him as 
Hub--Wickman was the land agent during most of my career with 
I'll back up on that. When the district took over the East Bay 
Water Company in 1928, the company had a management group, with 
Paul Daniels as land agent, that was engaged in handling its 
watershed lands. That continued after the utility district took 
over the East Bay Water Company for a few years, and until 
Daniels retired, and the district then created a department known 
internally as the "land department." And they were involved in 
the purchaseand later some salesof watershed and other lands 
of and for the district. They also were involved in the general 
handling of the lands. 


LaBerge: Okay, the land department also patrolled for fires? 

Raines: Yes, and illegal incursions onto properties. Hub Wickman was, at 
that time, given the position and title of land agent. He had a 
staff of three or four assistants, and they operated well. 

LaBerge: Would they come to you for legal advice? 

Raines: Oh yes, often. One big operation in which the land department 
was concerned was the leasing of watershed lands for grazing 
purposes. The district then owned, by purchase from the old 
water company, thousands of acres of the East Bay hills, and 
there was value in leasing them out for grazing for fire 
protection, if nothing else. The cattle kept the grass down, and 
there was revenue, too it wasn't a great deal, but there was 
some revenue. So the land department would work out these 
leases, and I would prepare the leases and also other documents 
or deeds from that department. 

The land department was continually busy in getting rights 
of way for pipeline extensions, pumping plant sites, et cetera. 
The land department would work out the terms of purchase : the 
price to be paid, and so on. Then I would go to the title 
insurance company and get a report on the condition of the title, 
and if that was satisfactory, then the deal would be closed and I 
would prepare the necessary documents. Otherwise, it would 
require maybe some more negotiations to work out some of the 
imperfections in the title, and that would be up to me, too. 


Business Law 

LaBerge: So in a lot of senses you were doing much more than just water 
law. You were really doing general law. 

Raines: Oh, yes. That was business law, really. It was pretty much like 
the East Bay Water Company, a private corporation, was doing 

LaBerge: When you needed to submit the bond issue for the special 
district, did you write up the bond issue? 

Raines: No. The usual procedure on a bond issue was this: [The chief 
engineer and his staff developed a complete and detailed report 
on the project, what was to be constructed and its estimated 
cost. This was referred to the general manager who revised it, 
especially in conjunction with the treasurer of the district, on 
all financial aspects of the project. If they approved, the 
general manager took it to the board of directors. If they 
approved, the wheels began turning in the direction of a bond 
election, with the general manager in full charge. My only 
significant part of the program dealt with the man we called the 
bond attorney.] 1 

There were certain attorneys in San Francisco and elsewhere 
who specialized in passing on the legality of bond issues. The 
security houses which would purchase the issue required that they 
get a report from one of these bond attorneys as to the legality 
of the issue. I remember conferences with George Harrington, a 
member of a prominent law firm in San Francisco. And we 
discussed the forms of the proposition to be submitted on the 
ballot as well as all resolutions and papers involved. And then 
after the election, Harrington would issue his opinion that all 
legal forms and procedures had been carried out according to law. 
That opinion then would be sent to the firms that were interested 
in purchasing the issue. So to that extent I was involved in the 
bond issues. 

LaBerge: And after that, did you have a financial department who would 
take care of selling the bonds and-- 

'Bracketed material was added by Mr. Raines during the editing 
process . 


Raines: Yes, well, the general manager and the board of directors handled 
that. I had nothing to do with the actual arrangements, except 
to approve the board's resolution. The treasurer of the district 
was deeply involved in those matters, and the secretary of the 
district handled the publicity for the bond election. 

LaBerge: Were you the one who wrote the contracts, well, for anything, but 
in particular the treatment plant or 

Raines: Yes. That was part of my job. And deeds for the acquisition of 
rights of way and easementsall legal documents passed through 
my hands . 

LaBerge: Now, in all of that, how much engineering did you need to know to 
be able to understand the issues? 

Raines: Practically none. 

LaBerge: You must have picked up quite a bit along the way. 

Raines: Well, it was very imperfect engineering, I would call it 

[chuckle]. But I would have many conferences with the engineers. 
The engineers enter into it for this reason, and I am out of it 
for this reason: take a project for new constructionthe 
engineers would develop a complete booklet of plans and 
specifications about a project and how it was to be built. And 
that was always a part of a contract, it was incorporated by 
reference into the contract. So that's the reason I never had to 
do any engineering. 

LaBerge: By the same token, they didn't have to do any legal work, right? 

Raines: That's true, yes. I handled many construction contracts in my 

time, and I can never recall that there was a problem over any of 
them. I frequently had visits from contractors who objected to 
maybe the method of payment or something like that. We would 
have discussions and try to work out those problems. But after 
the contract was signed, I usually was out of the picture; it was 
up to the engineers then. 

[This might be a good place to talk about the Lafayette dam. 
This is an earthfill structure west of that city in Contra Costa 
County. A contract was signed for its construction late in the 
1920s and work on it commenced. It was partially constructed 
when unexpectedly it began to subside. Work was stopped and an 
investigation was made by the district. It appeared that the 


subsoil was unstable and could not hold the weight of the dam. 
The district decided to lower the height of the dam appreciably. 
These developments affected the existing contract and created 
problems for the contractor. He hired a prominent San Francisco 
attorney, Max Thelen, and Mr. Wittschen and I had a number of 
conferences with that attorney regarding the work and the 
contractor. I did considerable study on the problems for Mr. 
Wittschen. The difficulties were finally settled and work 
resumed on a lower dam. Part of the land for the dam was 
acquired by a condemnation suit brought by the district, and I 
assisted Mr. Wittschen at the trial.] 1 

EBMUD Representative in Washington 

LaBerge: Any more anecdotes about setting up the special district, like 
going to Washington, D.C., or did you get to make some other 
field trips? 

Raines: Yes. Getting back to Washington, D.C., I should have spoken of 

this before: in addition to this trip to the Maritime Commission, 
I once made a trip to Washington with John Longwell, chief 
engineer and general manager. Later on, I made another trip to 
Washington with John McFarland, the general manager, and it seems 
to me I went once more by myself, although I'm not sure about 
that. But these involved mostly congressional committee hearings 
in Washington on matters which might involve the district. 

It got to the point along in the 1950s, where there seemed 
to be more Washington activity than there previously had been, 
and John McFarland decided that it would be better to employ 
someone in Washington as a watchdog, rather than to have district 
officials running back and forth. I was in discussion with him 
one day about the subject, and I suggested the name of Northcutt 
(Mike) Ely, a Washington attorney. He was a Stanford graduate 
and had been employed as a Washington representative by southern 
California interests, particularly with relation to the Colorado 
River litigation. I had picked up his name in Sacramento in 
talks with a friendly lobbyist from southern California. 
McFarland investigated, and decided to retain Ely, and it was a 

Bracketed material was added by Mr. Raines during the editing 
process . 


good deal for the utility district. He was still on the job when 
I retired. It gave us, really, an office in Washington. 

LaBerge: One of the trips I read about that you took was later on, having 
to do with flood control for the San Joaquin district after the 
accord with Amador and Calaveras Counties on the Mokelumne. That 
somehow you had to promise flood control to the San Joaquin- - 

Raines: I don't remember that. 

LaBerge: Okay. Do you remember what any of the actual other issues were 
when you went to Washington? 

Raines: No. 

World War II 


Raines : 

Well, let's go back a little bit to when the war started, 
remember what you were doing on Pearl Harbor Day? 

Do you 

Yes. I was at home. It was a Sunday. I had been working in the 
garden that morning at our home on Leimert Boulevard in Oakland. 
I hadn't had the radio on at all, and my wife hadn't either. In 
the afternoon, we were visited by friends of ours--a couple--and 
their first words were, "Oh, what do you think about Pearl 
Harbor?" That was the first information I had on it. We had 
really a bad night; there was a fear of Japanese bombing, and we 
had covered our windows . We had a lot of windows in that house . 

Our daughter was a baby, and my wife fed her on the inside 
staircase to the laundry room, where she could turn on the 
lights. And for several nights thereafter we would stand outside 
and gaze at the heavens. The lights were all out in the streets, 
and we could imagine we could see the lights of invaders up 
there. Our whole area went through a difficult time emotionally. 
There were area wardens in all areas of Oakland who patrolled at 
night to be certain that there were no exposed lights, and 
airplanes flew overhead at night for the same purpose. But I 
don't have any recollection of the termination of that war. 

There was one particular situation among many others that 
was created by the war that affected the district. The city of 
Vallejo had a perpetual water shortage, and they had asked the 
district to supply it by pipeline to the Carquinez Bridge. Mr. 



Raines : 

Wittschen then opposed it because our state permit provided that 
the water from Pardee Reservoir be used only within the ultimate 
service boundaries of the district, and Vallejo was outside that. 
He felt that supplying Vallejo without the permission of the 
state might imperil our permit. So we turned Vallejo down. 

Then one day at a board meeting we were visited by a 
delegation of many golden-striped naval officials from Vallejo 's 
Mare Island navy yard who demanded that the district supply 
Vallejo, and, incidentally, Mare Island. The board was reluctant 
to act, and the leading admiral finally said, "Well, under the 
War Powers Act, we'll just take over your system." So with that, 
all our qualms ended, and we did construct a line to the center 
of the Carquinez Bridge where Vallejo picked up the water on its 
own section of the line. The district already had a line to the 
sugar refinery at Crockett. After the war, Vallejo had gone 
ahead with plans to get water from a dam on Suisun Creek and also 
from a canal from the Bureau of Reclamation's Delta supply, so 
the shortage was over and the district service was closed to 
Vallejo. The district also installed a temporary pipeline on the 
Bay Bridge to furnish a supplemental water supply to the naval 
base on Treasure Island, which was already served by San 

And what were you doing during the war? 

Not very much, I'm sorry to say. I was on various boards; I was 
appeal agent for the Selective Service board in Oakland, and I 
was on the rationing board, which rationed gasoline during the 
war. This was voluntary, non-compensatory service. It was also 
part time and I continued my regular work schedule at the utility 
district. I also believed that by helping to continue the supply 
of water to the East Bay, I contributed to the war effort. 

You were above the age of-- 

I was the age of forty at the outbreak of the war. 
classified number four on the draft category. 

I was 

The Board of Directors 

LaBerge: Last time, we talked a little bit about the board meetings, and 
your going to the board meetings, and I guess this would be just 


in general: what did you see as the board's function for all 
your years there? 

Raines: Well, it was to determine policy and oversee the operation of the 
district, and the board controlled finances and everything else. 
There were many things that the general manager and the attorney 
and the other officers could do on their own, but on matters of 
importance and especially on matters of policy and finance, the 
board's authority was supreme. If there was a difficulty, 
particularly a real difficult problem, it would always be 
referred to the board by the general manager. At every meeting, 
the agenda was always complete with a full report of what had 
transpired of importance to the district since the last meeting. 
Sometimes some of these items would call for board action, and 
sometimes it was just informative. 

LaBerge: In the scrapbook you gave me, there were some of the minutes from 
the board meeting when it was announced that you had been hired. 
In the attorney's report. Did the attorney always give a report 
at the meeting? 

Raines: Well, yes. If there was something of importance of a legal 

nature or something of interest. And the attorney's advice was 
always requested by the board on matters of legal interest. Mr. 
Wittschen frequently strayed into other fields. The nitty- 
gritty, like the filing of a condemnation suit for a little right 
of way for a small pipeline, was never taken to the board. Those 
matters were handled entirely by the general manager, but such 
things as the interceptors, the building of dams, those were 
matters vital to the board. And matters of budget also. 

LaBerge: Were there some kind of written guidelines so that you would 
know- - 

Raines: No. It was all by ear. The district's operations in the early 
days were, as I just mentioned, largely by ear. And it wasn't 
departmentalized to a great extent. When Governor Pardee 
retired--! think about 1941, maybe-- 

LaBerge: Grant Miller became president for a short period and he was 
succeeded by Frank Wentworth in 1943. 

Raines: Wentworth was a modern businessman. He had a large stationery 
business in San Francisco and he was also treasurer of Mills 
College. He made the beginnings of instituting modernized 
business practice into the district's operations. It didn't 


amount to too much at that time, but it was a start. And there 
were some changes. I remember one thing that affected the legal 
department: occasionally at the Committee of the Whole meeting 
the board went into what they called "executive session," and 
they would retire into the next room, which was the general 
manager's office. These meetings would involve such things as 
salary increases, personnel changes, and matters like that, that 
were not for all the other officers' ears. But in the earliest 
days, these meetings were also attended by John Longwell, the 
general manager, and by Mr. Wittschen. When Wentworth became 
president at these meetings, the general manager was usually 
included but Mr. Wittschen was excludedthe board wanted to talk 
among themselves on non-legal matters. He had always been 
included under previous presidents. 

Changes in the Organization, 1946 

LaBerge: Let me see. My information says that Leroy Hamman wanted to 
separate the job of general manager and chief engineer, and 
McFarland was only general manager. 

Raines: McFarland became general manager in 1950. 
LaBerge: And Leroy was president from 1946 to 1949. 

LaBerge: You were going to say something about Mr. Hamman. 

Raines: Mr. Hamman was in business; his office was in the Central Bank 

building in Oakland at 14th and Broadway. I think he was largely 
an investment counselor, but his real business is a bit nebulous 
as far as I'm concerned. There began to be a change on the board 
after Mr. Wentworth resigned in 1946, a feeling that there could 
be a more strictly organized and less segmented organization than 
was then being run. Mr. Hamman came on the board and made that 
his first priority. He did such things as separating the offices 
of chief engineer and general manager; up to that point they had 
always been combined in one person. He separated them--he 
prevailed on the board to separate them. 

LaBerge: And this was when Mr. Longwell was still both. 


Raines: Yes. After the separation, John Longwell announced that he was 
going to retire, so Mr. Hamman then led the search for a new 
general manager. Robert Kennedy, already in the engineering 
department, was elevated to the post of chief engineer, and that 
left only the general manager to be selected. Mr. Hamman 's 
search led finally to John McFarland, who had been employed by 
the Lockheed Aircraft Company in southern California. 

LaBerge: How did you feel about that change? 

Raines: I was a little bit disturbed by the whole project. You know, you 
hate to see old things go, things you grew up with. They 
disappear, and you have to learn new things. For example, one 
proposal was made to me by Phil Wagner, one of the men McFarland 
had put in charge of the reorganization. He suggested that the 
legal department specify each day and each hour of the day how it 
was spent. I think modern private law firms do do that now, but 
it was impossible for my department to work that way. I had been 
on the road, all hours of the day and night, to Sacramento and 
other places. Jack Reilley was fighting condemnation cases up in 
the mountains, and Frank Howard was busy in the local area and 
elsewhere. We never watched the clock, so it was just an 
impossibility. I pointed that out, and McFarland 1 s staff decided 
the old order would continue as far as the legal department was 

There was a great deal of unrest among the general 
employees. As a matter of fact, one semi-official of the 
district came to see me one day, and suggested I start a campaign 
to restore order in the district. I refused to do that; I felt 
it was up to the general manager- -this was what the board wanted, 
and I was not going to buck it . But there was that feeling of 
dislocation among the general employees, and because of the 
various shifts, it lasted quite a while. 

Leroy Hamman as President 

LaBerge: The next board president was Louis Breuner? 

Raines: After Hamman. Incidentally, Mr. Hamman was the man who retained 
me [chuckle] . 

LaBerge: Oh, he was? I didn't realize- -you mean, named you as general 


Raines: He was president of the board. 

LaBerge: He must have had some good foresight there. 

Raines: Thank you. I thought I had mentioned this before, but Mr. 

Wittschen had retired, and there was a vacancy; Les Irving and I 
were curious as to what was going to happen, whether they were 
going to bring in an outside attorney, or just what was in the 

LaBerge: Oh, we did talk about that. 

Raines: Mr. Hamman and I became friendly personally. I knew many of the 
members of these various boards by first name, and they called me 
by my first name. I always had good standing with the board. 
With Hamman 1 s resignation, Louis Breuner was appointed to the 
board, and I think that Grant Miller may have been president for 
a brief period. 

LaBerge: I think you're right. 

Raines: Mr. Breuner was not appointed president right away; he just 

filled Hamman 's post as a director, and then later he was elected 
president of the board by the board itself. 

LaBerge: For quite some time, too. 

Raines: Oh, getting back--I was going to tell you about Hamman. We were 
finally on a first-name basis. At the beginning, I didn't know 
him at all. One evening, there was a meeting of the Book Club of 
California in San Francisco; as a member I went to it, and lo and 
behold, there was Mr. Hamman. So we had one feeling in common 
for fine books. And we got along very well. His wife and my 
wife were members of the Women's Athletic Club, which had 
frequent parties and socials, and we and the Hammans always got 
together at those events. 

After he retired from business, I had a communication from 
his daughter--! think from Palo Alto--who said that the family 
was compiling a memory book for him, and that she would like a 
contribution from me. I was glad to write a nice letter, for his 


Louis Breuner and Hart Eastman 

Raines: Getting now to Mr. Breuner, he was a real worker. He, like 

Governor Pardee, spent full time at the district almost very day. 
Next to Governor Pardee, I would say Mr. Breuner was the most 
effective board president the district had had. He was genuinely 
interested in the district, and because of his family business, 
the Breuner Furniture Company, he had real standing as a 
businessman in the Bay Area. And that was always very helpful to 
the district in all its activities outside the board. 

He and I also got along very well; we were on a first-name 
basis, both of us. He and Mrs. Breuner, and Mr. and Mrs. 
McFarland, and Mr. and Mrs. Eastman socialized a great deal 
together after business hours, of course. I liked him very much; 
we got along well, so it was a very happy relationship for me. 

LaBerge: And the years he was president were the years of lots of 

construction, and really, the bulk of your work, wasn't it? 

Raines: Yes, it was. 

LaBerge: And Mr. Eastman--is this Hart Eastman? 

Raines: Yes. 

LaBerge: Public relations, is that right? 

Raines: Secretary of the district, he becamebut first he was in public 
relations, then he became secretary of the district. He was a 
very good public relations man; he had good contacts, and he put 
out good material. He was very helpful in such things as 
promoting bond issues and other public matters for the district. 

LaBerge: Would you and he also have to travel to other places to present 
the board's case? 

Raines: Oh, yes, we did not travel together, but I was on the road quite 
a bit. Sacramento, principally, and when the fishing in the 
reservoir matter was up, I was traveling. I remember even going 
to a Fish and Game Commission meeting in Fresno, and I attended 
conventions of the Irrigation District Association, and the 
California Municipal Utilities Association in cities all the way 
from San Diego to Grass Valley. 



So that is where Jack Reilley became important to me. While 
I was out traveling around the state, he was tending the home 
fires and keeping things on course. 

Sort of what you did when Mr. Wittschen was off-- 

Jack Reilley and Francis Blanchard 

LaBerge: Did you hire Jack Reilley? 

Raines: Yes, I did. The young man I already had- -John Deal- -who came to 
work during World War II died suddenly. I think I mentioned this 
before: I felt a need in the department for a trial lawyer. 
With Mr. Wittschen 's departure, there was a great gap there. And 
Jack had been assistant public defender in Oakland, and he had a 
great deal of trial experience. He was well recommended by a 
couple of judges I talked to, and I hired him. 

LaBerge: I'm going to interview him when we finish. 
Raines: Francis Blanchard also lives here at Rossmoor. 

LaBerge: That's right. Well, tell me about Francis Blanchard, because we 
haven't talked about him. 

Raines: Francis was a very good man in the water field. He was the man 
who supplied me with all the ammunition I needed, and he is a 
nice person and was a fine engineer. At the permit hearing on 
the Camanche Reservoir, he was the chief witness for the 
district. [We had many pleasant auto trips together in our 
conjunctive work. We once took a three-day tour of the mountain 
area involved in the Mokelumne project. He had a very good 
relationship with personnel of the Department of Water 
Resources. ] l 

LaBerge: Because of his expertise in-- 


Raines: Yes, in the water field. 

Bracketed material was added by Mr. Raines during the editing 


LaBerge: Should we stop there for today? And next time we'll take up more 
on the development of water law and the Mokelumne . 

Raines: I'd like to get into that fishing in the reservoir, too. 

LaBerge: We'll try to do all of that, and if we don't get that far we'll 
just set up another meeting. 


[Interview 4: October 26, 1995 ]## 

The Beginnings of the Land Department 

LaBerge: We could start with the Mokelumne project. 

Raines: There's something I want to say about the early days of the land, 
the purchase of the right of way, and the dissension on the board 
over the construction of the second Mokelumne aqueduct. I'd like 
to get a little in on that. 

LaBerge: That's good, because that is a beginning to this whole problem. 
Why don't we start there, and when they were building the first 
Mokelumne aqueduct, who decided to also leave space for the 
second one? 

Raines: Well, that's one of the things I want to talk about. In the 
earliest days of the district's organization, all land 
transactions were handled through the legal department. The 
right-of-way agents who purchased the land all worked through the 
legal department, and I was familiar with those men and even went 
out a few times to look property over with them. 

I always marveled at the wisdom of the planners of the 
Mokelumne project, that they specified a strip of land extending 
ninety miles from Pardee Reservoir to the East Bay area to be one 
hundred feet wide all the way, fee title. Of course, I came in 
about the last part of the purchase of the right of way in 1927. 
Most of it had been already purchased when I came in, but I was 
in at the end. I am not aware of any condemnation suit involved; 
the land agents were able to handle all the transactions. There 
are now three aqueducts on that right of way. 






The first aqueduct was constructed and finished shortly 
after I came to the district, and the water began flowing into 
the San Pablo Reservoir. At the time World War II broke out in 
1941, there was a tremendous influx of people into the district's 
area from the other states. John Longwell, then chief engineer 
and general manager, thought that there should be a second 
Mokelumne aqueduct constructed in order to meet the demand. The 
demand was not for more water; there was enough water stored in 
Pardee Reservoir. The problem was getting it to the East Bay. 
The original aqueduct number one was working to its full 
capacity, and Mr. Longwell felt something should be done about 
the situation. 

He presented to the board of directors early in the 1940s a 
proposal for a second aqueduct. There was strong opposition on 
the boardI'm speaking now of the Committee of the Whole, rather 
than the board in formal session. I don't remember the names of 
the directors who opposed the project. Their opposition was 
based on the assumption that at the end of the war, industries 
would shut down and the people who had flocked into the area to 
work in the war industries would all go back to the places from 
whence they came. On the board, director Roscoe Jones strongly 
opposed this position and strongly supported the Longwell 
proposal for a second aqueduct. There was quite a struggle on 
the board over the issue, but Mr. Jones finally prevailed, and 
the program went ahead. 

Were you involved in helping to convince people, or did you have 
an opinion? 

No, I only sat in on the board meetings; Mr. Wittschen was the 
attorney. There were no legal problems involved; it was just a 
matter of policy. I think the steadying influence of Governor 
Pardee was missing at that time, he having already resigned from 
the board. He was being missed. 

Materials were impossible to obtain during the war period 
and for a short time after the war, but they were finally 
obtained in the late forties, and the second aqueduct went into 
operation--! think it was in 1949. I once mentioned to Mr. Jones 
that if the district ever decided to place a name on the second 
aqueduct, it should be his because he alone was really 
responsible for getting the project started. 

It wasn't a question of needing more water, it was getting it 
faster to the East Bay? 

Yes. Getting back to the matter of the right of way, I have 
already mentioned that the East Bay Water Company had a land 


department, and when the utility district acquired the East Bay 
Water Company in December 1928, the water company's land 
department was merged into the utility district's organization 
chart. That was the start of the district's land department. 
The Mokelumne right of way was all purchased before the district 
had a land department . 

LaBerge: Do you know if there still is a land department today? 
Raines: Oh, yes. At least it did have at the time of my retirement. 
LaBerge: But is it separate, rather than part of the legal department? 

Raines: Yes, it was an independent department in the district. Now when 
it was taken over by the utility district, that ended the legal 
department's supervision of the land transactions. The legal 
department only came into it when legal matters were involved, or 
when a condemnation suit would be required or something of that 
sort. The legal department prepared all the documents required 
in land transactions. 

LaBerge: Any particular people in the land department who were influential 
or better at negotiating a contract, or-- 

Raines: Well, of course George Woodland's name has gone down in district 
history. Quite a bit of it is mentioned in the book Its Name Was 
M.U.D.--& real character, I guess I would call him that. He was 
a very nice man, and he came from a good family in San Francisco. 
But he roamed up and down the right of way just as if it were his 
own property. He joined an important men's club in Stockton and 
played poker and had his highballs with the local people. He was 
highly regarded. He really created himself as a character; 
that's the best way I can specify it. All this occurred in the 
purchase of the right of way. 

There was one other land agent who worked on the right of 
way; there were just those two. 

Application for More Water. 1949 

LaBerge: Okay, we came up to 1949 when the second aqueduct was built, and 
that's about when the district applied for more acre feet of 
water from the Mokelumne River. Why don't you tell me how that 

Raines: [I should mention here that the first state permit to divert 200 
million gallons per day from the Mokelumne had been issued to the 


district in April 1926. This all took place before my employment 
by the district in 1927. The entire procedure had been handled 
by Mr. Wittschen. From hearsay it apparently was quite a battle, 
with objections mostly from the lowest reaches of the river by 
agricultural interests there. The county of origin law was 
enacted in 1927, so the first permit was not involved in that.] 1 

The population within the district had continued to increase 
in the late forties and into the early fifties, and it was 
different than the situation confronting the district over the 
second aqueduct. This time it was a matter of water supply- 
securing more water. So that led to movement in the general 
manager's office to do something about the situation. I remember 
it must have been maybe in the middle 1940s, a group of us, 
including the general manager, Mr. Wittschen, and myself, went to 
Sacramento to interview Ed Hiatt, who was then state engineer, 
about developing another project on the Mokelumne. Not much was 
accomplished other than conversation at that meeting, but the 
district engineers continued to work out their project. 

Later in the 1940s, a group of us that included the general 
manager, I guess Mr. Wittschen was out by that time, and me, and 
maybe some more, had a meeting with Bob Edmonston, who was 
Hiatt ' s successor as state engineer. Edmonston in those days was 
beginning to boost the State Water Project, which was later 
adopted statewide, and he was not at all favorable to the 
district going to the Mokelumne for more water. He was trying to 
direct our attention to the Delta, to take the water out of the 
Delta. We district people were primarily interested in quality, 
and for that reason we turned down his proposal to take the water 
out of the Delta and stuck with the Mokelumne project. So after 
that, in June 1949, the district filed with the state engineer an 
application for a permit for the diversion of 125 million gallons 
a day out of the Mokelumne, which was in addition to the 200 
million we already had under the Pardee permit. 

The County of Origin Law had been enacted by the state 
legislature in 1927. By that law, the state Department of 
Finance was directed to make filings for large amounts of water, 
from all the major rivers flowing from the Sierra westward into 
the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys. Included in these 
filings were two for the Mokelumne River. So our request for a 
permit followed the Department of Finance filings. The County of 
Origin Law required the Department of Finance to make the 
filings, but the state engineer was given the authority to handle 

'Bracketed material was added by Mr. Raines during the editing 


the filings. That law, to a certain extent, even authorized the 
state engineer to make releases from priority and assignments 
from the state water filings. 

The County of Origin Law 

LaBerge: Can you tell me the difference between a release and an 

Raines: That is a question that was asked me by the State Water Rights 
Board later on, and it resulted in me giving the State Water 
Rights Board a brief dated November 30, 1956, covering quite a 
number of pages in a state document printed later. But to answer 
your question, I can't tell you now offhand what the differences 

LaBerge: But we could refer a researcher to that brief. 

Raines: That brief is contained in a bulletina paperback volume 

published by the California State Senate. It's entitled Ninth 
Partial Report by the Joint Committee of Water Problems, 
California Legislature, Report of the Counties of Origin 

LaBerge: And did you say earlier you were going to give your papers to the 
Oakland Public Library, or to-- 

Raines: Well, I had suggested that, but you have indicated an interest in 
them and they are yours, if you wish. 

LaBerge: If you consider giving them to the Water Resources Center 
Archives, we'd be happy to do that too. 1 

Raines: Okay, I'd like to. 

LaBerge: In any case, we were talking about assignments and releases from 
priority and that the state engineer had authority to release 

Raines: [I believe so, but that was disputed by the state officials 

involved in our application, especially by Harvey Banks. He was 

'Papers have been deposited in the Water Resources Center Archives, 
410 O'Brien Hall, University of California, Berkeley. 


state engineer and in water matters merged that office into the 
state Department of Water Resources with Mr. Banks at the head. 
In a letter I later wrote to Mr. Banks it is stated:] 1 "The 
County of Origin Law specifically stated the Department of 
Finance may release from priority or assign any portion of any 
appropriation filed by it under this part when the release or 
assignment is for the purpose of development not in conflict with 
such general or coordinated plan." 

LaBerge: You filed for a permit in 1949, and you all knew that the state 
engineer wasn't really in favor of it? 

Raines: That was Mr. Edmonston's opinion, Bank's predecessor. Well, no, 
we hadn't reached that point. I don't think that we ever talked 
to Mr. Banks or any state official beforehand about the County of 
Origin Law. It was, I think, our assumption that the way the 
County of Origin Law stoodthat in granting a permit, the state 
engineer, or later the head of the Department of Water Resources, 
would take into consideration the needs of the counties of origin 
and would release from priority the amounts left to the district. 
There had never been any indication that I am aware of that the 
Department of Water Resources would take any contrary position. 

Unsatisfactory Permit from Harvey Banks, July 1956 

Raines: Anyway, our request for the diversions proceeded to the hearing 
before what was then the state engineer's office and later the 
Department of Water Resources organization. Hearings started in 
October 1955 and lasted, with interruptions along the way, until 
March 1956. The hearings were then taken under consideration by 
Mr. Banks, and in July 1956 he issued a permit to the district. 
He granted to the district the amounts of water that were 
requested, but he included in the permit the proviso that the 
district rights were subject to the prior rights of the counties 
of origin. 

LaBerge: Which were Amador and Calaveras? 

'Bracketed material was added by Mr. Raines during the editing 
process . 


Raines: Yes. And the permit was also subject to negotiations between the 
district and the state Department of Fish and Game to work out a 
conclusion on the fish and game problem. This came as a shock to 
the district. I well remember it occurred on July 3, 1956, a 
Friday. Immediately after I read it, I reported to the district 
officials that we got nothing except a temporary right to use the 
water until the counties of origin or their successors got first 
crack at it. The permit not only did nothing to settle the 
county of origin problem, but it confirmed prior rights of the 
counties to the full flow of the unencumbered water in the river 
with no consideration of the needs of the counties. I was 
furious at Banks and immediately got on the telephone to his 
office; I wanted to have it out with him--I wanted him to tell us 
what he was going to do about the problem. I was told at his 
office that he was at Lake Tahoe. 

LaBerge: For the long Fourth of July weekend? 

Raines: Yes [chuckle]. It so happened that my family and I had long 
planned my vacation to start on July 4 for two weeks at Lake 
Tahoe. So we got off the next day and proceeded with our 
vacation. After I settled my family at the lake, I started out 
on a search for Banks. I finally found him late in the afternoon 
in the bar of the Tahoe City Hotel. I had it out with him there 
to no avail; he stood firm on his opinion, and really his only 
comment came to the point of him saying, "Cool off, it'll all 
work out." Well, I think both matters eventually occurred; I 
cooled off, but it took a lot of time, sweat, and much hard cash 
on the part of the district. 


Raines: --for it all to work out. 

Henry Holsinger from the Department of Water Resources 

LaBerge: What reason did he give you? 

Raines: I don't know whether he told me or whether I surmised that the 

attorney for the Department of Water Resources, Henry Holsinger, 
was behind the opinion. After my vacation, I went to Sacramento 
and had an interview with Mr. Holsinger. He was an elderly man, 
a nice man, but he was firm in his opinion that because the state 
legislature had enacted the Counties of Origin Law and directed 


the Department of Finance to make the filings, it would take an 
act of the legislatureand of course the signature of the 
governorto make any changes in those filings, such as giving us 
an assignment or a release from priority. 

I had a previous brush with Mr. Holsinger several years 
before. Some sort of water conference had been called for in 
Sacramento; I don't remember now for what reason, or what the 
conference was supposed to do. Anyway, I went, and all I 
remember is being seated in a large room with a lot of other men 
all engaged in water problems. Mr. Holsinger arose and addressed 
the session and made a proposalof which I have no idea now as 
to its meaning. It was received with silence by the audience, 
which I assume meant that it was approved. I decided it was time 
for me to get on my feet, which I did, and I told Mr. Holsinger 
that I objected to his proposal because I felt that it would do 
some damage to the East Bay Municipal Utility District. After a 
slight hesitation, Mr. Holsinger said, "Well, if you feel that it 
would do some damage to the district, I will withdraw the 
proposal." And he did. So that ended that. Several years later 
I was invited by his department staff to contribute to a memory 
book they were preparing for his retirement. I wrote a nice 
letter for his book. 

After not getting anyplace with Mr. Holsinger on the 
Mokelumne problem, I also had a conference with his chief 
assistant attorney--! don't remember his name, but he was equally 
adamant on changing or doing anything about the permit. So after 
my return to my office and spending some thought and discussion 
with Mr. McFarland, I sat down and wrote a letter to Mr. Banks. 
It was really a brief. In the paperback volume produced by the 
state and which I previously mentioned, it occupies eighteen 
pages of small type, single-spaced, and the original was probably 
all handwritten by me with pen and paper as was my custom. 1 I 
felt that at times like this, I thought better on paper than 
extempore. And the final version was also typed by my loyal and 
proficient secretary Lila Wagnor. 

It was my feeling immediately after that and I haven't 
changed my opinionthat the letter produced a profound effect in 
the Department of Water Resources. The type of the printed 
version is small, and my vision is poor, so I am unable to relate 

'Raines to Banks, 4 October 1956, California Senate, 1957 Regular 
Session. Joint Committee on Water Problems, Report on the Counties of 
Origin Subcommittee, pp. 108-139. 


salient points involved in it. In preparing the letter, I had 
consulted the printed records of the state Department of Water 
Resources on similar diversion problems. I think most of these, 
if not all of them, came from the office library of Francis 
Blanchard, the head of the water development department of the 
district. But those records showed me--and I included this 
information in my letterthat Banks or his predecessors had in 
the past released from priority a number of filings by the state 
Department of Finance for other water projects, including a 
release to the State of California itself for the Oroville Dam- 
part of the State Water Project. And closer to home, there was a 
release from priority to the Bureau of Reclamation for water from 
the Delta to supply the Contra Costa Canal; this canal serves 
water to several cities in Contra Costa County, including 
Martinez and Concord, which adjoin the boundaries of the utility 
district . 

I pointed out the inconsistency of the present position of 
the department when it had already made these releases and was 
now refusing it to us. As I have said, I felt at that time- -and 
my opinion has never changedthat the letter had a great effect 
in the Department of Water Resources, leading the department to 
seek some way out of the dilemma in which it now found itself. 

Opinion of Attorney General Pat Brown, 1956 

Raines: One of the directions that Mr. Banks could take would be to 

disregard the opinion of his attorney, Henry Holsinger, and seek 
an opinion from the state attorney general. The book entitled 
Its Name Was M.U.D. states that the district made a request to 
the state attorney general to take the matter over. I am not 
familiar with that, and I doubt that it happened that way. So 
how and why Banks decided to refer the matter to the attorney 
general, I don't know. But anyway, he did it. Somehow, we at 
the district learned he had so referred the matter; 1 don't know 
whether he told us or not, but we found it out. Mr. McFarland 
and I decided to engage in a little political activity at this 
point. Incidentally, this entire controversy was in my -opinion 
not a legal controversy; right from the start it became a 
political controversy. It had all the overtones of a political 
dilemma and outcome. 

LaBerge: So we're not talking about the development of new water law. 




LaBerge i 

No. So Mr. McFarland and I decided to make a call on state 
Senator George Miller at his office in Martinez. Incidentally, 
he was in the hierarchy of his political party [Democratic) , as 
was the attorney general. 

Who was Pat Brown. 

He was Edmund G. (Pat) Brown, Sr., later governor. Senator 
Miller was sympathetic with our problem because it affected his 
constituency, too. We asked him if he would speak to the 
attorney general about the matter. He said he knew so little 
about it that he thought it would be better if I spoke to the 
attorney general. I agreed to that, and Senator Miller said he 
would go along; Senator Miller made an appointment with the 
attorney general at his office in the state building in San 
Francisco. I was there at the appointed time and date, and 
Senator Miller was there also, and we both went into Mr. Brown's 
office. Senator Miller introduced me and stated his own interest 
in the problem and left the room. I sat down with the attorney 
general and explained the district's position and what we desired 
in the way of a release from priority. 

He expressed interest in our position and said he would 
refer it to one of his deputies for study and our position would 
be given complete consideration. With that, I thanked him and 
left. As I passed the outer office, Senator Miller was still 
there; we spoke briefly, I left, and Senator Miller went back 

into the attorney general's private office, 
that matter stood-- 

So that ' s the way 

For the record, what was the attorney general's opinion when it 
came out? 

Raines: Yes, I'll get to that. On December A, 1956, the attorney general 
issued an opinion which, in effect, stated that Mr. Banks had 
full legal power and authority to give to the district an 
immediate release from priority. Incidentally, I learned--! 
don't know how, that the attorney general had referred the matter 
to Jack Fraser, one of his deputies, for study and report. I had 
some trepidation about this because Fraser had represented the 
Department of Fish and Game at the hearings and was completely 
unsympathetic with the district's position. But whether he wrote 
the opinion or not, he came through. I felt that the opinion was 
not all that could be desired; it was not really four-way square 
on the subject, but it was adequate, and it gave us everything we 
needed, provided Mr. Banks would cooperate. 


I don't know when or if we learned after the attorney 
general's opinion whether Banks was going to consider it or not, 
but it developed that he was considering it, and had decided to 
disregard Mr. Holsinger's opinion. 

Hearing Before the State Water Rights Board 

Raines: Also after the attorney general's opinion, the matter somehow 
reached the State Water Rights Board. It was sort of a 
department dangling out there in the wind, and it acted- -and I 
think perhaps its authority was limited to advising first the 
state engineer and then later the head of the Department of Water 
Resources. I decided to- -and maybe I was compelled by legal 
restrictions, I don't remember--to take the subject up with the 
State Water Rights Board, and I was given a hearing before the 
board early in December 1956. It was really a delight; I had the 
best time before that board than I had ever had in appearing 
before any commission or committee. The chairman was Mr. 
[Phillip D.] Swing, who I believe was an ex-congressman from San 
Diego; he was most helpful, received me well, and he asked me the 
question you asked me a little while ago--to explain to him the 
difference between release from a priority and assignment. So I 
told him I would deliver something on that; I would have to look 
through the law books a bit. 

I was then slated for another appearance before the board; 
it was at that time that I submitted the brief, which I had 
previously referred tothat being dated January 4, 1957. I 
recommended a release. The water rights board rather quickly 
acted on this date, and suggested to Mr. Banks unanimously that 
he give the district a release from priority. 

So matters stood quietly for a few weeks, with no action by 
Banks when on February 18, 1957, the counties of origin--Amador, 
Calaveras, and other agencies on the Mokelumne Riverfiled in 
Calaveras County a lawsuit seeking an injunction against any 
action by Banks. The superior court there immediately issued a 
temporary restraining order to prevent Banks from acting on the 
request for release from priority. The court also set a time for 
hearing on a permanent injunction on the matter. Due to the 
negotiations later on, that hearing was never held; the suit was 
transferred to Sacramento County and it rested there. Banks was 
represented by Sacramento attorneys. The restraining order of 
the Calaveras court prevented action by Banks. 


LaBerge: At your urging was it transferred, or 

Raines: No, I the suit wasn't against us, it was against Banks. 

LaBerge: That's true. 

Raines: So there the matter rested. It became obvious to the district 
that our best course was to do some negotiating, and the 
negotiations then began. 

Meetings with Counties of Origin 

LaBerge: So up until this time had you talked with people from those 
counties or others who also felt entitled to the water? 

Raines: Not especially at that time. But we did now seriously begin 
that. I had all kinds of meetings; I was lobbying the 
legislature for some changes in the law, without success. 
Assemblyman Francis Lindsay from the Roseville area was receptive 
to my pleas and tried to do something in the legislature. 
Anything of that nature was opposed by state Senator Stephen 
Teale, who came from West Point, a town in Calaveras County. 

I was appointed a member of a statewide committee organized 
by the state attorney general to seek a solution of the county of 
origin problem. We had several meetings in Sacramento and Los 
Angeles and issued two reports, which really were useless; they 
came to no conclusion. And we and other members of the 
management team at the utility district were busy talking to all 
kinds of people. Getting back to the legislature, none of the 
East Bay legislators were willing to tackle the problem at all. 

LaBerge: I wonder why. 

Raines: I don't know. So that's the way the battle went on, without any 
particular results. I had numerous conversations with the 
attorney for the Calaveras County Water District, whose name I 
don't remember; his office was in Sacramento. I had conferences 
with Martin McDonough, an attorney in Sacramento who represented 
Amador County, who also was my friend, and we weren't getting 
anyplace anywhere along the line, it seemed to me. 

Then one day I had an appointment with the attorney for the 
Calaveras County Water District in Sacramento. Incidentally, 


- 00 
M C 

at co 

4-> S 

M .H 


V Vi 

CO 0) 

co O 


0) 13 

,J C 

co co 

PU b 



iH H 

0) O 

CD 4-1 

C 4J 

3 < 

O - 

.. a> 

ca C 

(U -H 


O T3 
CD f-H 

^ 1*^ 



CO >s 



4-1 CO 
i-l M 
0) O 

t-H CO 
v-' -H 


O O 

C H 


B T3 

4-1 CO 

H B 
CO < 

(U - 

Q i-H 


0) CO 
4-> C 
CO 3 
4-1 O 

>-i O 00 
O CO 4-> 3 
4-> O CJ O 
CU t-> O 

B S^i-i Q 
OS 4J >O O 

n c s 

O 3 - 
(0 O co C 
CO O Ai -H 
C 4J 

to cfl H 

m TJ S 

ON Cfl 

-*! .. 






- U 


CU 4J 

B o 

(U i-( 
0) M 
V4 4J 
00 U) 


0) >-i 

> V 

H 4J 

5 CO 






3 C 

H 3 

(U O 

4J O 


S co 

00 M 

13 CU 

H > 

CO Cfl 

O .H 

rH CO 














this water district was carrying the battle for Calaveras County. 
Mr. McFarland went along; we talked without any success for a 
while, and out of the clear blue sky Mr. McFarland proposed to 
the attorney for Calaveras that the utility district would be 
willing to pay one million dollars in settlement of the problem. 
I don't know if he had talked to Mr. Breuner about this. That 
sum was based on a study made by Tudor Engineering of the amount 
that would be required to provide appropriate water supply to 
Calaveras County. The study was not our study; it was made for 
the Calaveras County Water District. The element of cash in the 
problem sparked immediate interest. And it began to break the 
ice up and down the line. It was the solvent to our impasse. So 
eventually the one million dollars increased to two million 
dollars apiece to Calaveras County Water District and to Amador 
County. As the weakening pressure developed, it also seemed to 
improve our relations with Banks. 

Historic Agreement, 1959, with Amador and Calaveras Counties 

LaBerge: Do you think he had his own personal reasons for favoring one 
side or the other? 

Raines: I have surmised and felt always that the district suffered- -not 
only in his department, but in other departments of the state-- 
from a David vs. Goliath syndrome. Here was this great rich 
seaside metropolis draining the very lifeblood of the poverty- 
stricken mountain counties. I felt that was always behind these 
controversies. So as the struggle went on, finally conclusions 
were reached. 

I didn't have too much of a part in reaching the itemized 
matters, such as the amounts of water to be delivered to the 
counties and so on. Francis Blanchard and his staff worked out 
the nitty-gritty water items. But anyway, finally agreements 
were reached. I prepared the final documents which, after a few 
changes, the other attorneys finally approved. And everybody sat 
down in Mr. Banks 's office in Sacramento on March 5, 1959, and 
said good-bye to the problem. This was a full dress gathering 
with representatives from the counties and Mr. McFarland and 

[I exchanged signed copies of the agreement with the other 
two lawyers, McFarland presented the two checks, and Banks signed 
the release form priority. When McFarland handed him the two- 



million-dollar check, Vernon Campbell, the elderly president of 
the Calaveras board, briefly fainted. As well he might. I think 
he really activated the matter and he had been involved in it 
right from the start. I also believe that by his contacts with 
the Department of Water Resources, he played an important role, 
particularly in shaping Henry Holsinger's advice. Our paths 
frequently crossed in Sacramento and he always had a quiet smile 
for me as he went about his crusade. We were on a first name 
basis . 

Harvey Banks was later quoted as saying with regard to the 
agreement: "It has significance which extends beyond the 
Mokelumne River and beyond the parties directly involved." He 
was of course referring mostly to the cash payments made by the 
district.] 1 

This was ten years after your original- 

Yes. There was left still dangling, however, the matter of 
negotiation with Fish and Gamethat being one of the provisions 
of the permit. The field work was entirely handled by Francis 
Blanchard. He was given authority to retain the services of a 
fisheries expert from the state of Washington. And the two men 
worked out the details of an agreement with the Department of 
Fish and Game. Basically it meant the construction of a fish 
hatchery at the base of the proposed Camanche Dam, which was to 
be constructed and operated in perpetuity by the district and it 
is still in operation. I had little to do with the field details 
and the negotiations, although I came in on legal matters on the 
final contract wind-up. That was completed in March 1960. So 
that concluded the great battle of the Mokelumne River. 

LaBerge: When you were just even giving your arguments to various 

agencies or to the other counties on why the district deserved 
that water, did you use certain standards in water law, like 
reasonableness, or what use you were going to put the water to, 
or something like that? 

Raines: I think all of those elements entered in. There were elements 
that were favorable to us; for example, under the state law, 
water for domestic use had a higher priority than agriculture. 

'Bracketed material was added by Mr. Raines during the editing 


But the arguments were more mundane than that ; they were really 
down to basicseventually it was a matter of cash on the 
barrelhead, really, that turned the tide. There were, of course, 
in the agreement provisions for satisfactory amounts of water for 
the mountain counties. Lots of water. 

LaBerge: I know in one of the thingseither one of your speeches before 
one of the boards, or your letter- -you pointed out that if every 
district or county asking for water got it, there wasn't going to 
be enough. Period. And it seemed to be that your argument was 
very reasonable, and you showed that the district was the only 
one able to go through with the proposed planthat no one else 
had a real plan for the use of the water. 

Raines: That is very true. Calaveras County, as I remember it, 

immediately put the two million dollars to use and constructed a 
project. I don't know how successful that has been, but I don't 
hear any complaints. Amador County, for a long time, sat on its 
two million and made loans to various local subdivisions for 
water developments. I imagine the capital has long been 

LaBerge: And to your knowledge has there been any problem since that time, 
like anyone coming back saying, "We don't have enough water"? 

Raines: Well, there was some agitation later in Amador County in inner 
political battles. There were claims that the directors or the 
supervisors who had signed the agreement with East Bay had sold 
out the county, and I guess there may have been some resentment 
in Calaveras I don't know. I understand that there have more 
recently been political problems along the river, but I know 
nothing about them. 

LaBerge: Have any other districts solved their water problems that way 
since, do you think? 

Raines: I think and this seems to be supported by statements made by the 
Department of Water Resources, that the matter of payment for the 
water really proved a climax--! guess that in main has been the 
policy of other agencies. The district was given by the state 
officials accolades for developing a reasonable process for 
settling the water rights problem. I don't know whether the 
county of origin law is still in effect or not, but I haven't 
heard the words used since the district's settlement on the 
Mokelumne . 


LaBerge: Tell me about Mr. [William] Gianelli. I know that in your 

scrapbook he wrote you a congratulations on your retirement. You 
must have worked with him some more. What was he like? 

Raines: Bill Gianelli was a fine man. Everybody liked him; he was 

reasonable, had a wonderful manner. I admired Bill a lot. He 
later became Banks 's successor at the state Department of Water 

[In the retirement letter you referred to, he had this to 
say about me: "Your ability to work with engineers, 
understanding their problems and adapting studies and solutions 
for legal usage, has made the engineering accomplishments 
meaningful. Certainly it has resulted in a team effort which I 
doubt can be matched in any other organization."] 1 

The Board and the Legislature 

LaBerge: When Mr. McFarland proposed the cash settlement the first time, 
did the two of you have to go back to the board on that, or had 
he already checked this out and had it kind of up his sleeve? 

Raines: As far as I knew, that came out of the clear blue sky. He may 

have discussed it beforehand with Mr. Breuner; I don't know. Of 
course, it had to go back to the whole board after it was made. 

LaBerge: How did the board interact in all of this? 

Raines: Oh, they were completely supportive, no question. Anything we 

needed or experts we required, why, it was all given freely after 

LaBerge: Did they get involved in any of the lobbying in Sacramento or in 
P.R. work? 

Raines: No, the boardprincipally Louis Breuner--this was in his early 
days, and maybe some of it was after the settlement --went up and 
had a meeting or two with the Amador County Board of Supervisors. 
That may have been on problems that arose after this matter was 

'Bracketed material was added by Mr. Raines during the editing 


settled. But outside of Mr. Breuner's activity, the other 
members of the board took no active part in it. 

The 1950s were a very busy bunch of days for me. There was 
not only this water settlement, but the question of opening of 
the reservoirs for fishing arose. Mr. Breuner took an active 
part in this. The agitation began in the East Bay among local 
groups of sportsmen, and people in general couldn't understand 
why all of this open land and water couldn't be put to use by the 
public. From the local level, the matter was picked up by local 
politicians and legislation began to be introduced in Sacramento 
to require the district to open up the reservoirs. 

LaBerge: Which local politicians? Do you remember? 

Raines: No, it was pretty widespread. Well, chiefly, it was my old 

nemesis from Richmond: Assemblyman Masterson. He picked this up 
with a flourish, this problem. He introduced bills in the 
legislature. Other local representatives in the legislature were 
supportive of his measures; it was a popular thing to do. The 
district was out in left field all by itself. The only local 
support that I had was from Luther (Abe) Lincoln, who was speaker 
of the assembly and had a business in Concord; and Donald Doyle, 
the assemblyman from Lafayette. They were supportive of me to 
the extent of patting me on the back, but actually they were 
outnumbered and outvoted. There was little that they could do. 
I don't know how many hearings on these bills I attended- -without 
any success. I remember in one hearing before a senate 
committee, I suggested that a certain bill might be 
unconstitutional, and the chairman of the committee, who was from 
Marysville, said he was not bothered by the constitution. This 
man, after retirement, moved to Rossmoor in Walnut Creek where I 
lived, and we chatted amicably in the local golf shop. The 
Masterson bills were also supported in the senate by Senator 
Stephen Teale from Calaveras County. 

LaBerge: Was he harboring a grudge, do you think? 

Raines: No, Steve and I really got along well personally. He was a good- 
natured giant of a man, and he would make a genial crack at me, 
and I was less enthusiastic about making return cracks' at him; we 
really got along pretty well, but we were just on opposite sides 
of the fence. 

In these sessions, Mr. Breuner played a big part and was 
supported by the board. The fear expressed was pollution of the 
water supply-- 


LaBerge: Which is legitimate. 

Raines: Yes. And Mr. Breuner attended meetings and hearings; he was 

active in it. But the prevailing wind was against us, and the 
bills began to grind to a conclusion. I remember the final bill 
was coming up on a certain day in the assembly, and I sat in the 
speaker's private office watching on his in-chamber TV as the 
votes were counted. They were, of course, against us. So that 
ended that. 

Recreational Facilities 

LaBerge: Once the bills were approved, what work did you have to do on 
those issues? 

Raines: I had very little to do. At first, the district entered into an 
agreement with the- -incidentally, the East Bay Regional Park 
District had been formed, and they were, I think, happy to see 
events take the turn they did. The district first entered into a 
lease agreement with the park district for recreation at Lake 
Chabot in the Oakland hills. I later heard Mr. McFarland express 
the opinion that the district would have been less bothered if it 
had gone in itself and done the job. Agreements were entered 
into after Camanche Reservoir was constructed for operation of 
private concessions at the Amador side of the reservoir, which 
has proved to be a going project. Agreement was also entered 
into with Calaveras County to operate a marina and recreation 
area on the south shore; that didn't prove successful because of 
lack of patronage, apparently. It was finally given up by the 
county. And then, of course, there's the big development of San 
Pablo Reservoir and Lafayette Reservoirall successful fishing 
and recreational areas, and all operated by the district. 

LaBerge: So Fish and Game came into these agreements, too? 
Raines: No, they didn't, outside of supplying fish. 

As I say, the fifties were busy for me because I had not 
only the Mokelumne water rights, the fishing in the reservoirs, 
but also the usual nitty-gritty of the law office. I was on the 
road a great deal between Sacramento and the East Bay. And then 
along about 1960 or so, I think I began to lose steam [chuckle]. 




LaBerge : 
Raines : 

Raines : 

Bills were being introduced in the legislature, particularly on 
labor relations problems. At the same time, there were labor 
relations problems within the utility district which McFarland 
had to handle. I felt that the labor problems were out of my 
line, and my compulsory retirement was looming on the horizon, 
and I was just tired. 

Mr. McFarland, I think, sensed the problem, and he retained 
the services of George Meredith, a permanent lobbyist in 
Sacramento who resided in that area. I had been doing the 
legislative representation since Les Irving resigned in 1947. I 
was glad to give it up; however, the new lobbyist had no 
knowledge of the district or its operations, so he frequently 
called on me for advice and also for appearances before 
committees in the legislature. However, after a short time 
McFarland dismissed Meredith, and as far as I can recall, I guess 
I was still in charge in Sacramento when I retired in 1966. This 
legislative work also required the perusal of all of the hundreds 
of bills introduced to determine if they had any impact in the 

I had a name someplaceis it Plumb, or is that name- 


John Plumb was the secretary of the district and a publicist, 
during the early sixties my activities were restricted pretty 
much to the work at home. After everything legal was cleared on 
the Mokelumne River, construction began on the Camanche Dam. 
There were quite a number of problems related to that, such as 
the acquisition of all the property. Jack Reilley took that 
over, and there were several condemnation suits and other land 
acquisition problems, all of which he handled with great 

Frank Howard was busy, too. He had one particular job I 
have never forgotten. In the little settlement of Camanche, 
which was to be flooded by the reservoir waters, there was a 
pioneer cemetery. Frank had the job of supervising the removal 
of the remains and their reinterment elsewhere. He did that job 
in great shape. [laughter] 

He must have had to do a little P.R. work along with that. 
That about winds me up. 


Friendly Relations with Adversaries 

LaBerge: Okay, I have a couple questions on it. You mentioned that you 
enjoyed appearing before the State Water Rights Board more than 
anything. What made that such a delight? 

Raines: Oh, the reception I got; it was friendlyand eagerness for 
information, which I was able to supply. 

LaBerge: So you didn't feel they were your adversaries. 

Raines: No, no. 

LaBerge: It sounds like you felt other groups were your adversaries. 

Raines: Yes. And as I said before, not only adversaries, but there was 
this underlying David vs. Goliath suspicion. 

LaBerge: Despite that, it sounds to me as ifeven people who were on 
opposing sides, you always got along with them. I mean, last 
time you had mentioned Homer Buckley, and Frank Richards, and 
Stephen Teale you mentioned today. And Harvey Banks in the end 
were the two of you friendly? 

Raines: Well, so-so. Banks 's manner was more formal; I think that worked 
against- -no, I felt differently about Banks than I did about 
Gianelli, for example. I don't mean to infer that I felt 
unfriendly with Banks; I was not. Of course, I was really angry 
at Banks when that permit came out on July 3, 1956. But it was a 
professional anger, not a personal one, and I got over it. 

LaBerge: You mentioned once before, too, John Nejedly; I can't remember 
what it was in reference to. Maybe we haven't gotten to that 
yetbut you still got along with him even though you were on 
opposite sides. 

Raines: Some problems with John began when negotiations were underway for 
the annexation of Walnut Creek to the district. He and Jack 
Reilley also had some sharp words on this subject. 


LaBerge: Okay, the district was contemplating the annexation of Walnut 


Raines: Yes. He was city attorney and he was making demands during the 

negotiations that the district could not possibly concede, and we 
had some discussions on thatand disagreements. I don't know 
whether it was in that connection or not that he had introduced 
in the legislature a bill amending the Municipal Utility District 
Act in some respects and which the district strongly objected to. 
I don't remember now what the details were. But the bill was set 
for a committee hearing in Sacramento before a legislative 
committee. He appeared and I appeared, and I remember we stood 
almost right in the committee chairman's face, badgering each 
other [chuckle] ; it was really a hot controversya hot 
presentation, rather. We were shouting in each other's faces. I 
think the district came out all right. So those were the 
occasions he and I disagreed. He and I became quite friendly. 
He and I have lived for years in Walnut Creek, and we had chance 
meetings at the Safeway market at which we chatted briefly and 

[John Nejedly was a feisty young man in those days. Another 
problem we had in connection with the annexation of Walnut Creek 
had to do with several small, local water companies in the area. 
Their water supply came from local run-off and some of them 
resisted a takeover. Jack Reilley handled all of this and he and 
Nejedly probably tangled over some of this. I remember 
overhearing some heated conversations between Nejedly and Jack. 

This reminds me of a similar situation in the East Bay 
cities. When I came to the district in 1927, there were a number 
of small, local water companies. Part of their supply came from 
pumping from the underground. I recall a large wellfield in 
north Richmond. There was another in southern Alameda County. 
Some of those companies were large enough to require regulation 
by what was then called the Railroad Commission. The district 
takeover required public hearings locally before a commission 
officer. I represented the district at several such hearings.] 1 

LaBerge: Should we end there for today, and maybe plan to meet one more 

Raines: Well, I really don't have anything more to talk about, unless you 

Bracketed material was added by Mr. Raines during the editing 
process . 


Water Fluoridation 

LaBerge: Tell me about your involvement with the water fluoridation issue. 

Raines: It must have been in the 1950s. Dental groups began to talk 

about water fluoridation of the district's supply. The dental 
associations all sponsored it, and there was a push on the board 
of directors of the district to introduce the fluoridation 
project. There was great opposition to fluoridation among the 
population; principally by religious groups-- 

LaBerge: Which religious groups? 

Raines: Oh, I don't want to mention that. On the board, too, there was 
disagreement. Mr. Breuner, the president of the board, was 
strongly opposed to fluoridation; I think his opposition was 
being based on his feeling that there should be no tinkering with 
the purity of the water supply. So the board of directors turned 
down all of these proposals for fluoridation. 

There were meetings--! remember the dental society had 
meetings including large numbers of children, it being pointed 
out how they would benefit from this fluoridation process. So 
finally legislation was introduced by the state senator from 
Oakland, [long pause] I can't find his name. 

Well, I'll back up. Before the board, my opinion was asked 
by Mr. Breuner on the legality of fluoridation. I gave him an 
opinion that the district had no authority to add anything of 
this nature to the water supply. So, following that, the state 
senator from Oakland introduced the bill to require fluoridation 
by the district. There were some hearings on the bill, finally 
as it came out, and as I remember, required that there be an 
electiona general electionbefore the process could be used. 
The legislation, incidentally, was considerably amended by us to 
make it more palatable, we being faced either with the problem of 
making a decent bill or suffering otherwise. So the bill passed, 
and an election was held; the fluoridation process was defeated. 
The bill also provided, as I remember it, that a second election 
could not be held within the next two years after the defeat. At 
the end of the two-year period, another election was held, and as 
I remember it, the fluoridation was again defeated. But it 
eventually was introduced I don't know how. I don't think there 
was a third election, so the district must have decided to go 
ahead and introduce the process anyway. 


LaBerge: Because our water is fluoridated now. 

Raines: Yes. I noticed on TV a few nights ago a program expounding the 
fluoridation process it seems to me there was legislation in 
Congress now to require it in the larger cities. 

But the passage of the legislation, of course, erased my 
opinion that the board did not have the authority under the 
original act to introduce the process. On that subject, the 
attorney general had issued an opinion that the district could 
fluoridate under the original act, whereas the legislative 
counsel issued an opinion to the legislature that the district 
did not have the authority to introduce it. So at least I had 50 
percent support in the state. 

LaBerge: The attorney general's opinion, I take it, prevails over the 
legislative counsel's. 

Raines: No, not necessarily. When the attorney general's opinion came 
out, I was asked by members of the board, "What about this, and 
the attorney general's authority?" and I told the board, "Well, 
he's only another attorney as far as I'm concerned," and that's 
the way it stood. Of course, I felt differently on this subject 
when the opinion on our water permit was involved. 

LaBerge: Going back to the labor relations problemsdid you have any 
dealings with unions, or did someone else do that? 

Raines: Not much, that was all in Mr. McFarland's area. 

Taxation Issues 


Raines : 

What about taxes? 
kind of tax law? 

How much involvement did you have with any 

Not very much. When the district was first organized and well 
into operationthis was into the mid-thirties it was Mr. 
Wittschen's opinion that the employees of the district^ which was 
an arm of state government, could not be required to pay federal 
income tax. The result being that employees were not required to 
file their returns. About that time, a case went to the U.S. 
Supreme Court involving the New York Port Authority which took a 
position similar to Mr. Wittschen's with regard to their 
employees' federal taxes. The Supreme Court ruled that the Port 



Raines : 

Authority employees were under the federal income tax provisions 
and were required to file. So with that as a precedent 
authority, Mr. Wittschen gave the board his opinion that the 
utility district employees were equally liable for federal 

Also, while Mr. Wittschen was still attorney, Amador and 
Calaveras Counties increased the assessed values of the Pardee 
watershed lands, which the mountain counties decided required an 
increase in the taxes the district had to pay for those lands. 
The amounts previously being paid were, I believe, small; this 
was a large increase. Under the law, the utility district could 
not be taxed by local authorities for property within its 
boundaries, but for property outside its boundaries such as 
Pardee Reservoir the district could be taxed by the local 
authorities. So it has been paying the tax. 

Mr. Wittschen decided to fight the matter. I think the 
State Board of Equalization had jurisdiction. He sent me to some 
other mountain counties to find out, for example, what San 
Francisco was being assessed in Tuolumne County. I remember 
spending two days in Sonora, going through the county records; I 
finally came out with a report. The hearing before the State 
Board of Equalizationif that is the one that was handling it at 
the timewas held, and the board ruled in Wittschen 1 s favor and 
reduced the assessed valuations and, of course, the taxes. 

We also had some problems with the Delta island assessments 
by the local reclamation agency, all of which worked out. So 
those really were the only tax matters that I can recall 
involving the district. 

What about after you solved the Mokelumne problem and Camanche 
was being builtdid Amador and Calaveras Counties come back 
again and ask for more 

In recent years since my time I think there were problems. 
That was in Jack Reilley's time as attorney. 

An Antitrust Suit 

LaBerge: I'll ask him about that when I interview him. Did you get 
involved in the antitrust suit with the pipe suppliers? 


Raines: Only to one extent. That came up in the last few months of my 
tenure with the district. The Sacramento Municipal Utility 
District had filed a suit against--! don't remember now whether 
it was a pipe manufacturer or just what product was involved. 
But anyway, it was an antitrust suit. They had been successful 
and procured a sizeable judgment. I took my cue from that, and 
had an investigation internally about the prices being charged 
the district for pipes by--I think it was called the American 
Pipe and Construction Company --which had its plant in southern 
Alameda County. It appeared to me that we were being unduly 
charged, and that something could be done about it. 

I think it was Joseph Alioto who handled the Sacramento 
case. So I made an appointment with Mr. Alioto in San Francisco, 
and John McFarland and I went over to talk to him. He thought we 
had a case, and he was willing to take it on. He asked for a 
retainer of twenty thousand dollars, which Mr. McFarland agreed 
to. So the case then came up--I don't know whether it went to 
trial or notbut the case came up after I left the district. 
And it seems to me that the district did recover a judgment for 
something like twenty million dollars or--it was a sizeable 
amount, it may have been only two million--! don't know. This 
again was in Jack Reilley's tenure. 

LaBerge: But it covered the twenty thousand retainer [laughter]. 

Raines: Yes, well beyond that. But Joe Alioto, I'm sure, had other 

expenses along the way, too--in addition to the twenty thousand. 
And when I retired, I had a nice letter from him inviting me to 
come over and have lunch with him someday. I never took up the 

LaBerge: Well, maybe you should now [laughter]. 
Raines: I should have kept the letter- -which I didn't. 

LaBerge: Well, speaking of that- -you have spoken of having your files that 
you thought were still at the district. Do you think they still 
are there? 

Raines: Oh, yes. I had collected all of the documents related to the 
Pardee water rights, and those were in a special case at my 
office at the district. Just a few years ago, when things began 
to stir again as to events along the Mokelumne, I had a call from 
attorney Bob Maddow. He told me how much they appreciated having 
all of this material available for use. 


LaBerge: I'm glad that no one has disposed of them. 

Raines: Yes, the practice of the offices in the district in my time was, 
when your filing space finally got more than the capacity made 
possible, everything went down to the corporation yard to be 
stacked away in files. So I guess a lot of this stuff --past 
minutes of the board meetings and that sort of thing- -may be 
still down there. 

Development of Water Rights Law 


Raines : 

How about a broad question to end with: 
law develop on water rights? 

how have you seen the 

Oh, it has changed completely. In my dayand beforewhen you 
got a permit it meant what it says; you got water. Since then, 
the environmental movement has forced- -forced is the right word-- 
but at least has encouraged the development of different ideas 
about water rights. Really, a permit today is just about what we 
refused to take from Banks back in 1956. This comes about 
largely as the result of the diversion by the Los Angeles 
Department of Water and Power from the Mono Lake area, east of 
the Sierra. In that litigation, the court made a ruling that 
there was a new element in water diversion: a natural right. 
Streams had a natural right to live; fish had rights to live, and 
a water right or permit was subsidiary to these other claims. To 
me, it has ruined the permit process. A permit now is just a 
hunting license for water. 

I didn't have any of that to deal with. Looking back on it, 
we went into permit hearings on the Mokelumne short of testimony 
of fishery in the Mokelumne River. That was largely based, I 
think, on our feeling that there wasn't a fishery on the river. 
The records show that there was practically no run of salmon up 
the Mokelumne River. As a matter of fact, before Pardee Dam was 
constructed, and water releases were made during the summer, the 
river became dry- -or practically so. The fry from the spawn of 
the few salmon that could come up the river couldn't go down the 
river. So we didn't regard the fishery matter as a particular 
problem; but we were mistaken in that because the Departments of 
Water Resources and Fish and Game leaped into the vacuum that we 
had created. Also, at this time the environmental movement had 
not gathered the steam it later had. 


LaBerge: Well, are there any questions that I had forgotten to ask you? 
Is there any subject you want to address? 

Raines: No, I can't think of any at the moment. We covered all the 
principal subjects that I was involved in. 

LaBerge: Maybe when you get the transcript back, and we both look at it, 

if there's one more subjectyou could add it in handwriting. Or 
I could write out a question and you could answer it. 

Raines: Fine. [I think I mentioned earlier in these interviews something 
about a family aspect in my earlier days at the district. That 
appears to have a hang-over. I am a member of a small group of 
retired executives of the district who, over a period of the last 
year or two, have met occasionally to discuss and offer advice to 
current (1995) members of the board of directors and officers of 
the district regarding plans under consideration to expand the 
present water supply. That group also includes John McFarland, 
Jack Reilley, Francis Blanchard, Orrin Harder and one or two 
more. We have also met with the general manager and the board of 
directors . 

In winding down these old memories, I wish to extend my 
gratitude and appreciation to those people with whom I was 
associated at the district during my busy years between 1927 and 
1966. Thank you all, my friends.] 1 

Transcriber: Gary Varney 

Final Typists: Carolyn Rice, Shana Chen 

Bracketed material was added by Mr. Raines during the editing 


TAPE GUIDE- -Harold Raines 

Interview 1: September 29, 1995 

Tape 1, Side A 

Tape 1, Side B 

Tape 2, Side A 

Tape 2, Side B 

Interview 2: October 4, 1995 
Tape 3, Side A 
Tape 3, Side B 
Tape 4, Side A 

Insert from Tape 5, Side B [10/18/95] 
Resume Tape 4, Side A 
Tape 4, Side B 

Interview 3: 
Tape 5 
Tape 5 
Tape 6 

October 18, 1995 
Side A 
Side B 
Side A 

Tape 6, Side B (not recorded) 

Interview 4: October 26, 

Tape 7, Side A 

Tape 7, Side B 

Tape 8, Side A 

Tape 8, Side B 








INDEX- -Harold Raines 


Alioto, Joseph, 89 
Amador County, 14, 56, 70-71, 75- 
80, 82, 88 

Banks, Harvey, 43, 69-78, 84, 90 

Barrows, David P., 30 

Barry, David, Jr., and Mary Gray 

(grandparents), 2 
Bartlett, Louis, 30 
Blanchard, Francis, 63-64, 73, 77- 
78, 91 

bond issues, 53-54, 62 
Book Club of California, 61 
Bray, Frank, 50 

Breuner, Louis, 60-62, 80-82, 86 
Brown, Edmund G. (Pat), Sr., 73-76 
Brown, Ralph M. , Act, 30 
Buckley, Homer, 45, 50, 84 

Calaveras County, 14, 56, 70-71, 

75-82, 88 
California Municipal Utilities 

Association, 62 
California State Department of 

Finance, 68-73 
California State Department of 

Fish and Game, 62, 71, 74, 78, 

82, 90 

California State Department of 

Water Resources, 63, 70-73, 75, 

78-80, 90 
California State legislature, 28, 

30, 40, 41, 45, 50, 62, 68, 69, 

71-72, 80-83, 85-87 
California State Water Project, 73 
California State Water Rights 

Board, 69, 75-76, 84 
Camanche Reservoir, 63, 78, 82, 

83, 88 

Campbell, Vernon, 78 
Campfire Girls, 18, 43-44 
cases, City of Lodi, 16, 24-25; 

Kieffer. 16, 24-25, 40 

Chapman , , 7 

childhood, 3-6 

Colby, William, 8-9 
condemnation, process of, 16, 24- 
25, 40, 48-51, 55, 65, 67 

Daniels, Paul, 52 
Davis, Arthur P., 38-39 
Deal, John, 17, 63 
Degnan, Myrtle, 43 
Dixon, Cherokee, 43 
Doyle, Donald, 81 

earthquake of 1906, San Francisco, 

East Bay Municipal Utility 

District (EBMUD) , 12-91; Board 
of Directors, 14, 20-21, 28-39, 
41, 51, 54, 57-62, 66-67, 80-81, 
86-88, 90-91 

East Bay Regional Parks, 35-36, 82 
East Bay Water Company, 19-20, 30, 

35, 39, 42, 52, 53, 66-67 
Eastman, Hart, 62 
Edmonston, Bob, 68, 70 
Ely, Northcutt (Mike), 55-56 
environmental movement, 90 
Erickson, Erland, 12 

fishing in reservoirs, 62-63, 78, 

81-82, 90 

fluoridation, water, 86-87 
Fraser, Jack, 74 

Gayley, Charles Mills, 7 
Gianelli, William, 80, 84 
Grabhorn Press, 22 
Grunsky, C. E., 30, 38 


Hadsell, Dan, 13 

Hamman, Leroy K. , 28, 59-61 

Hanna, Frank, 39 

Harder, Orrin, 91 

Harrington, George, 53 

Hiatt, Ed, 68 

Holsinger, Henry, 71-75, 78 


Howard, Frank, 17-18, 43-44, 60, 

Irrigation District Association, 

Irving, Leslie, 13-15, 24-29, 40, 

42, 45, 50, 61, 83 

Jones, Roscoe, 66 
Jorgenson, Lee, 49 

Kennedy, Bob, 39, 48, 60 
Key System, 37, 42 
Kidd, Alexander, 7 

labor relations issues, 83, 87 
Lafayette Dam, 54-55, 82 
Lincoln, Luther (Abe), 81 
Lindsay, Francis, 76 
Longwell, John, 29, 39, 48, 50, 

55, 59-60, 66 
Los Angeles Department of Water 

and Power, 90 

Maddow, Robert, 14, 89 
Maley, Marian Cecilia Raines 

(sister), 1, 3 
Mare Island, 1, 3, 5, 6, 57 
Masterson, S. C., 41-42, 81 
Mayon, Ethel, 42-43 
McDonough, Martin, 76 
McFarland, John, 50, 55, 59-60, 

62, 72, 73-74, 77-78, 80, 82, 

83, 87, 89, 91 
Meredith, George, 83 
Miller and Lux, 19 
Miller, George, 74 
Miller, Grant, 30, 58, 61 
Mokelumne River project, 14, 63- 

82, 84, 88-90 
Municipal Utility District Act of 

1921, 31, 51, 85 

Neilson, Tom, 30 
Nejedly, John, 84-85 
Nelson, Herb, 33 

Oakland, city of, 12, 13, 18, 19, 

23, 32, 37, 45-46 
Olson, Culbert, 27 

Pardee Dam, 39, 57, 65-66, 88, 89, 

Pardee, George, 14, 20-21, 31-37, 

58, 62, 66 
Plumb, John, 83 

Raines, Anna Barry (mother), 1-5 
Raines, Florence Adelman (spouse), 

2, 18, 28, 44, 56 
Raines, Joseph M. (uncle), 4, 10- 

11, 12-13, 25 
Raines, Raymond Thomas (brother), 

1, 3, 4 ' 

Raines, Thomas, Jr., (father), 1-5 
Read, Dan, 20-21 
Reilley, John B., 16-17, 26, 36, 

41, 43, 60, 63, 83-85, 88-89, 91 
Richards, Frank, 49-50, 84 
Riley, Phil, 32, 37 

Sacramento Municipal Water 

District, 40, 89 
San Pablo Reservoir, 66, 82 
sewage disposal, 45-50 
Simon, Kay, 20 
Singleton, Elizabeth Ann 

(granddaughter), 2, 18 
Singleton, James Thomas 

(grandson), 2, 18 
Singleton, Margaret Raines 

(daughter), 2, 18, 56 
Skinner and Eddy Shipyard, 3, 5 
Southern Pacific Railway, 10-11, 

Sproul, Ida Wittschen and Robert 

Gordon, 24 

State Bar of California, 23 
Swing, Phillip D., 75 

Tashiera, Arthur, 20 
tax issues, 87-88 
Teale, Stephen, 76, 81, 84 
Thelen, Max, 55 
Tilden, Charles, 35-36 

United States Bureau of 
Reclamation, 73 

University of California, 

Berkeley, 6-7, 27, 47; Boalt 
Hall School of Law, 7-9, 10, 45 


University of Washington, 3-4, 6, 

Wagner, Phil, 60 

Wagnor, Lila, 17, 42-43, 72 

water law, 12-13, 16, 19, 22, 23- 
26, 63-64, 67-80, 86-87, 89-91 

Wells, Chauncy, 7 

Wentworth, Frank, 21, 30, 33, 58- 

Wickman, Herbert J., 50, 52 

Wittschen, Theodore, 12-29, 33-34, 
36-37, 40, 42, 50, 55, 56-57, 
58, 59, 61, 63, 66, 68, 87-88 

Woodland, George, 67 

World War I, 3, 5, 6 

World War II, 17, 29, 46, 51, 56- 
57, 63, 66 


B.A. in History, 1970, Manhattanville College 

Purchase, New York 

M.A. in Education, 1971, Marygrove College 

Detroit, Michigan 

Member, State Bar of California since 1979 (inactive 

Elementary school teacher in Michigan and California 

Experience in legal research and writing, drafting 
legal documents 

Volunteer in drug education program and hunger 
programs, Oakland and Berkeley, California 

Interviewer/Editor in the Regional Oral History Office 
in fields of law and University history since 1987.