Skip to main content

Full text of "WESTERN CIVILIZATION IN THE NEAR EAST"

See other formats


509 



'<$. 



WESTERN CIVILIZATION 
THE NEAR EAST 



WESTERN CIVILIZATION 
IN THE NEAR EAST 



BY 
HANS KOHN 

TRANSLATED INTO ENGLISH BY 

E. W. DICKES 




NEW YOBK: MORNINCSIDE HEICHTS 
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS 

1936 



JflKHT rUBI-ISUKD IK OKlUtfANY tlNPKK THK TITIJC />!> 

JKurop&isicrung de& Orients (SCHQCKWN VFTRI^AU^ BKHT.IN, 



FORPIION 



OXOHOK 

HHOA1>WATT 



fit OftftAT MITAII PV WAtJUV MOT**** 
S09 KIMCMIWAV, LOMSIOM, W.C.t J AMO AMIMNUl, MUtt 



TO 

.DR. J. JL,. MAO3STES 
12ST CmA-TJESFtri:, MEMOR,V 

YKARS IW JBRTTSALIIIM 



14 Tho ri^ht rtuniitt^ of *m! ioititlit v I-IHJ* 
tvtTiiir of lif ati<! 



I* 



* *n * 

tliHf tlm ttnly *|ii**Hfifin twfum IIM IM fli 
iiit*fli>ri h\ whioh ^'c* rrprt*f*riif i^* unify." 



CONTENTS 

PAGE 

PREFACE ix 

INTRODtTCTION 1 

THE ENVIRONMENT 9 

MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT IN HISTORY 23 

MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT AT THE PRESENT DAY 9 

CHANGING MAN IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT 87 

INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS OF WORLD 

COMMUNICATIONS 1 1(5 

INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS OK WORLD 

ECONOMICS 147 

INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS OF WORLD 

POLITICS 185 

METHODS AND PROBLEMS OF EUROPEANIUTION 227 

BIBLIOGRAPHY 307 

INDEX 321 

MAP 330 



vll 



PREFACE 

MODERN civilization had its origin in Western Europe. 
But from its beginnings it was universal in aim and 
scope. Its fundamental attitude was rationalist and 
individualist, secularist and scientific. It appealed to 
man and his reason, it destroyed the traditional attitude 
of mind and structure of society. During the nineteenth 
century it spread from Western Europe to the rest of 
Europe and to all other parts of the earth. The latest 
stage of modern civilization, the age of the motor car and 
the aeroplane, of the cinema and wireless, spread almost 
simultaneously through Europe and the two Americas, 
to Asia and Africa. Modern civilization has become 
world-wide. 

This process of the spread of modern civilization, 
which has become the outstanding and dominant factor 
of the history of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, 
has been called the Europeanization of mankind. On 
account of its modern civilization Europe was able in the 
nineteenth century to conquer and dominate the world 
politically and economically. The spread of modern 
civilization enables the non-European peoples to-day to 
reject Europe's political and economic control. The 
brief epoch of European world domination seems to be 
approaching its end. The world-wide triumph and 
ascendancy of the civilization of Europe impHes the 
weakening and waning of Europe's political and economic 
superiority. Like other races before them, the Europeans 
were entirely ready to ascribe their political and economic 
successes to an inborn or God-ordained superiority. But 
before the rise of modern civilization Occidental and 
Oriental races had met as equals, in fact the cultural and 
the political superiority had rested frequently with the 
latter. 



x PREFACE 

Modern civilization transformed Europe. This highly 
complex process was not only a question of technical inno- 
vation, of political and economic reorganization, of the 
advance of science. The coming of modern civilization 
involved a complete and profound re-moulding of theentire 
cultural and social heritage of Europe. Man and his 
environment changed entirely ; a new outlook upon the 
world, a new feeling of life, a new valuation of man '8 place 
in history and society evolved. But in the midst of the 
new dynamic changes and adaptations ancient primitive 
and medieval belief^ emotions and ntateaof mind survived. 
This cultural lag and the quickening pace of changes 
made modern civilization conscious of the need for 
permanent readjustment. 

The new Europe arising out of this transformation 
came in its new feeling of exuberant strength into contact 
with the old civilizations of the East at a time of their 
decay or stagnation. Out of this meeting followed not a 
clash of races or religions, but a contact and conflict of 
civilizations or of stages of civilization. The medieval 
but flexible civilizations of the Eat adapted thcmBclvcm 
to modern civilization as the medieval civilization of 
Europe had done before them, Again, as in the countries 
of Europe, the change could not remain confined to matters 
of technique or organization, but comprehended the whole 
man and all manifestations of life. As modem civiliza- 
tion becomes more and more universal, the races and peoples 
of the earth meet again more and more on a footing of 
equality as they did before the rise of modern civilization. 

This universal acculturation and the ensuing birth of a 
coherent and closely-knit humanity, facing similar social 
economic and cultural problems, will determine the new 
trends of world history. Their effect is felt in Mexico and 
in China, in Ethiopia and in Brazil. 1 studied them for 
almost twenty years in the more limited area of the Near 
and Middle Bast. These lands had been for many centuries 
politically and culturally linked up with Europe ; their 
estrangement had set in with the rise of modem civiliza- 
tion. I entered first into contact with the Mualim East 



PREFACE xi 

in Turkestan, when I came in April 1915 to Samarkand. 
Having been born in Prague in the old Austrian Monarchy, 
the classical battleground of nationalities and civilizations, 
I quickly became interested in the problems of nationalism 
and the history of civilization. I spent fifteen months in 
Samarkand and in Ferghana and then over three years in 
different parts of Siberia and the Far East. A residence 
of nearly six years in Paris and London brought me into 
the centres in which modern civilization was first born and 
from which the main modernizing influences upon the 
Near and Middle East emanated. From the autumn of 
1925 I lived in Jerusalem and travelled extensively in the 
countries of the Near East. I wrote the present book 
mainly in the year 1932 and finished it on May 15th, 1934, 
the day I left the Near East. In the present edition 
figures and other statements have been brought, as far as 
possible, up to date. 

I wish to express my sincere appreciation and grate- 
fulness to Mr E. W. Dickes of Manchester for his most 
valuable help in rendering the present book into English 
and for his interest in the book. 

ILK 

Northampton, Mass. 
January 1936. 



INTRODUCTION 

THIS book is concerned with the countries of the Levant 
and their immediate hinterland. There are two ways 
of approaching such a subject. It is possible to choose 
geography as the starting point nature, the factor which 
remains unchanged through long epochs as the basis of 
all happenings, and the picture can then be rounded into 
plastic form. Or the starting point chosen may be his- 
tory, the communal life of men with its changes in the 
course of time, the competitive ambitions and tendencies 
in political and economic life, the tireless effort of the 
human spirit, and the story may then lift itself up to 
the dynamic of drama. In every exposition the two 
elements interpenetrate one another: space and time, 
nature and mind. The environment, in its divisions into 
valleys and mountains, in the composition of the soil and 
the coast formation, in climate and winds, sets limits to 
man's political and economic activities, and in all sorts 
of ways determines his manner of living and his mental 
make-up. Its influence shows itself, however, most 
strongly in primitive man ; humanity gradually learns to 
become more and more independent of its environment : 
in this victorious though never-ending straggle the mind's 
weapon is technical advance. The character and destiny 
of a nation are partly determined by the soil, but they also 
overcome the influence of the soil, wrest the national type 
from it, and determine its place amid further associations. 
Among various peoples, in different countries, and at 
different times, there are to be found identical or similar 
economic and cultural stages, with their characteristic 
effects on all fields of personal and social life, The 
unity of great cultural regions, embracing many countries 
and peoples, which come to share a common destiny ; the 
contact and mutual enrichment of these cultural regions 
in the course of time through their neighbourhood ; the 



2 INTRODUCTION 

unity of the human race and of its intellectual and social 
development/ a unity preserved in spite of all territorial 
and national divisions release the life and the history 
of man more and more from the first predominantly static 
condition, reinforce the dynamic influence of the inter- 
relationship of all happenings, and give the lives of men 
and nations a meaning and a unity which permit of com- 
prehension and of mutual understanding. 80, in the 
exposition which has to proceed from the geographical 
starting point, the historic destiny, and for us the living 
present with its tendencies to growth and change, come 
more and more into the foreground. Geography sets the 
stage, a magnificent scenery with the dignity and the 
gravity of thousands of years ; for the old writers, both 
in the Bible and among the Greeks, tell UH that in the 
Levant the climate and the soil have remained uniform 
through all history. On this stage, within ite limits but 
not its limitations, there proceeds the speetaele of history. 

All history is interwoven, every act ho* its natural 
antecedents, but, for all that, new element* may make 
their appearance again and again and dependence on the 
past at a critical turning-point may mean the dewtruetion 
of the future. This should be borne in mind above all 
in the present condition of the world, threatened every- 
where with ruin and chaos on a scale never before wit- 
nessed* The only way out is to make now a radical 
breach with the past, to enter on new paths, and, distant 
and doubtful as the goal may appear in the age of 
universal nationalism and of jealous autarchy within every 
geographical area, to proceed to the creation of an all* 
comprehending economic order, a world federation, 
embracing and preserving all individual characteristics, 
but establishing on our shrinking earth the one world* wide 
stage for the one single spirit of man. 

The countries of the Levant, the coastal strip around 
the south-eastern basin of the Mediterranean, reaching 
from Greece and the Straits of Byzantium to the Nile 
Delta in a vast are which encloses the Aegean and the 
Levant Sea, have already occupied the centre of the stage 



INTRODUCTION 3 

in past history at a period when there existed a forerunner 
of the World State. The Roman empire, with its Hellen- 
istic culture, had been an approximation to the World 
State ; it had founded a unity of the whole economic 
area of civilization on the basis of unity of intellectual 
life ; it had embraced the " world " ; at its frontiers 
there came to an end all of the " world " of which the 
people of that day had knowledge ; beyond them began 
the deserts and virgin forests of barbarians destitute 
of economic organization and of intellectual life. The 
eastern basin of the Mediterranean had divided the 
three continents of that world ; and since, with its wealth 
of islands and bays, it had formed a highway which had 
long been in use, it had also united the three continents. 
Here Asia and Europe met one another, here they 
exchanged their wares, from here in the very earliest 
times routes led in one direction to the barbarians of the 
north north-west through the western Mediterranean to 
Gaul and Britain, north-east through the Black Sea to 
the vast plains of Sarmatia and in the other direction 
to the storied lands of the south, to India and the Far 
East. Here, therefore, there rubbed shoulders the various 
cultures and ways of living which were to determine the 
character of Western humanity. From here Europe and 
Asia received their names, Europe, the old Assyrian 
ereb, the western land, and Asia, the old Assyrian acu, 
the eastern land Occident and Orient, from the view- 
point of the Aegean, Ponente and Lewmte as they were 
called later, when in the Middle Ages the Italian maritime 
towns began to control the trade of the eastern Mediterra- 
nean ; the Far East, the way to which led through the 
Levante, was then called the High Levant* 

The Levant was at first the centre of the world, the 
beginning of world history. Here the cultures of the 
Nile Valley and of Mesopotamia met. From here the 
Phoenicians went out on their mission of cultural and 
economic development and synthesis of the Mediterranean, 
Here, in Crete and Qyprus, the first centres of Aegean 
civilization came into existence. For thousands of years 



4 INTRODUCTION 

the Levant remained the great bridge of the world, or 
more precisely the Pontifex Maximus, the great builder 
of the bridges thrown between the civilizations of different 
regions and epochs. Perhaps ** Pontifex Maximus " 
should be kept as a human distinction, and in that case 
the title belongs to Alexander the Groat, whom* action 
made the Levant the home of the Hellenism which in its 
universalimn paved the way for Christianity, and, grown 
rigid, has lived on to modern times in Islam and in the 
eastern churches. The Levant was the centre of the two 
greatest movements in the history of the Middle Ages, 
Islam and the Crusades ; the blood that wa# wheel was the 
Levant's ; and in those movements the Levant completed 
its bridge-building function. By the end of the Middle 
Ages the Levant was sinking out of history ; the eastern 
Mediterranean , once the central sea of the worh I , t he h intone 
stage par excellence, WIIH becoming a deHerted backwater. 
Since then Europe has advanced to world dominion 
as the realm of modern humanimn and industrialism. 
Only in recent decades, with the cutting of the Suez 
Canal and the coining of the motor car and the aeroplane, 
has the eastern shore of the Mediterranean, the girdle 
dividing north and west Eurojie from the tropical wealth 
of the south of Ania and the east of Africa, returned to ite 
old importance. In our own days there him been 
proceeding in this region a structural change affecting 
its inhabitants in all their HOC in I and jirrHonnl relations. 
This change is not confined to the Levant, to the territory 
of the former Ottoman empire and Persia ; it in proceed- 
ing similarly, sometimes with more intensity, sometimes 
with less, in Russia and central Asia, in India and China, 
in Africa and Latin America, AH these countries, which 
embrace three-quarters of the human race, are becoming 
" Europeanized ". They are awakening to historic 
consciousness, are taking over from Europe its humanistic 
mental attitude, inherited from the Renaissance and the 
Encyclopaedists, and its technique, based on natural 
science, They are " modernizing " themselves, and an 
determined to enter into active partnership in the single 



INTRODUCTION 5 

economic and intellectual community of the world which 
is being formed through the new possibilities of com- 
munication and production. The Mediterranean is no 
longer the centre of the world as it was in the time of 
the first World State, the Roman empire. But it is once 
more of great and growing importance. 

The Near East, unlike the Far East, was at one time, 
indeed until far into the Middle Ages, based on the same 
intellectual and social foundations as Europe. It is not 
as something entirely strange that it is now receiving the 
revitalized inheritance of ancient thought in Europe's 
science and humanism. 

The structural change in social life in the Levant 
becomes of significance as typical of the process of 
Europcanization which is now going on throughout the 
world. From its geographical situation the Near East is 
of incomparably greater importance to Europe, politically 
as well as in other respects, than the Far East and the 
Pacific, South America or Africa. In the " Near East 
question " lay the origin of the Crimean War, the Balkan 
Wars, and the World War. Here Great Britain, Russia, 
Germany, France, Italy struggled and still struggle over 
the most important inter-continental routes in the world, 
for world power and world influence* In Turkey, Iran, 
Afghanistan, Arabia, there stand confronting one another, 
more than elsewhere, the two great systems of world 
power of the present day the Anglo-Saxon Imperrum, the 
commercial imperialism of the capitalist and industrialist 
economic epoch, supported by the missionary ideals of 
Christian and democratic civilization and by the race- 
consciousness of the Nordic aristocrat ; and the Soviet 
Union, the social imperialism inspired by a new missionary 
ideal and by the conviction of the complete equality of 
rights of all races and peoples, which stands ready to serve 
as pattern and helper for all peoples engaged in their 
own industrialization and modernization. 

The change in social and economic structure is proceed- 
ing under the slogan of Nationalism. The peoples of the 
Levant first, in the nineteenth century the inhabitants 



6 INTRODUCTION 

of the Balkans, and then, at the beginning of the twen- 
tieth, Egyptians and Anatolians, Arabs and Iranians, 
even Kurds and Afghans, have awakened to national 
consciousness. They aim at making the territories they 
inhabit into unified states, politically and economically 
independent, and to provide them with a modern 
administrative system. And they aim at the fulfilment 
of their historic " mission ", which every jyeople likes to 
infer from its past and from its talents, and no longer to 
be objects of " imperialist activism " in the political and 
economic fields. They are taking up the Htrtigglu against 
centuries-old fetters of tradition, and are trying to create 
a new State, a now economy, a new wociety, and an their 
bearer a new human type tanks of a magnitude demand- 
ing the utmost expenditure of effort from all these peoples, 
economically and culturally backward and mink under 
misrule and oppression. 

In this effort they find themselves in conflict not only 
with the external adversary, Imperialism, in whose 
interest, as it seems to them, they an* kept in a weak 
condition and at a modest level of development, but also 
with their own intrinsic weaknesses, which the external 
adversary knows how to exploit, their great poverty and 
ignorance, an inheritance from the past, their sparse 
population, the absence of a sense of solidarity, and the 
lack of endurance, strength of character, and sense of 
responsibility. The overcoming of those defects pre- 
supposes the creation of an 61ite, a stratum of intellectual 
and moral leaders; it presupposes also a patient and 
tenacious work of education in every field and a period 
of undisturbed development. But these desiderata of 
time and peace are lacking, and so the structural change 
has to proceed amid pressure from without and poverty 
at home, in tbe midst of the play of conflicting forces, 
amid a painful succession of frictions and inadequacies. 
Centuries of progress have to be overtaken in a few years 
before the bases of organic growth have been established. 

From the point of view of world politics and world 
trade, these are regions of comparatively little significance 



INTRODUCTION 7 

apart from the important fact of their situation as transit 
countries. They are relatively small States, not in area, 
it is true, but in population and industrial equipment ; 
they are largely covered with deserts, steppes, and infertile 
mountain territory, and are frequently without natural 
water supplies for the development of agriculture and 
without mineral wealth for the development of a large- 
scale industry. 

But what is going on in the Levant is typical of a 
process which is now world-wide the effort of the 
colonial and semi-colonial countries to achieve emanci- 
pation. In this territory of an immemorial civilization, 
this classic field of tension between Orient and Occident, 
this historic battlefield of empires and peoples, civiliza- 
tions and religions, there are now proceeding an outward 
straggle and an inward change of fundamental impor- 
tance. Here the expansionist tendencies of all the Great 
Powers come into conflict in a narrow space. Here 
Napoleon sought tho route to India and Great Britain 
found it and developed it, though the dream of the great 
Middle Eastern empire, based on Constantinople and 
Baku, Haifa, and Basra, could only be partially realized. 
Here Germany made her thrust with the Baghdad 
Railway and tried to take up anew, across a vast land 
bridge and with a bold territorial grasp, the old medieval 
dream of the succession to the Imperium* Here Russia 
pressed forward from her cold northern steppes through 
the Bosphorus, from the Caucasus and from the oases of 
Turkestan to the warm open seas and gulfs of the south, 
and sought to found her Middle Eastern empire. Here 
the traditions of the Crusades still lived vividly enough in 
French minds to inspire the ambition of incorporating the 
Levant in the French Mediterranean empire, and the 
memories of Rome's world dominion awoke in the new 
naval standing which the Italian flag has secured in the 
Mediterranean, with the repeatedly announced intention 
of spreading the power of the new Roman empire and 
its surplus population over the territories in which Rome 



8 INTRODUCTION 

once before showed her quality in the ordering and 
policing of the world. 

In this unique field of tension of world politics the 
indigenous peoples are trying to secure their existence 
and progress. In the last fifteen years new States have 
arisen here, old ones have recovered their youth, social 
and cultural and economic systems hundreds and indeed 
thousands of years old have been rapidly revolutionized; 
here the primitive and immemorial lives on Hide by 
side with the latest advances in civilization. Islam 
is beginning to change under the influence of the enlight- 
ened West in the name way an once the religion of the 
desert Arabs was modified through contact with the 
surrounding civilization of Hellenism and the Persian 
empire. The dignified but entirely torpid churches of 
the Orient are awakening to now life through contact 
with their Western sisters, and the reunion of Orient and 
Occident under the imperial a?gia of the Anglo-Saxons 
finds its spiritual reflection in the approach between 
Anglican ProteBtantism and the patriarchate** of the 
East* All these political, intellectual, and economic 
movements are being lit up by the emotion, often 
expressed in the rhetorical terms of the southerner, of 
newly awakened aud enthusiastic nationalisms ; to them 
there come from the opposite pole of Western influences 
storms which are sweeping over the whole of Asia and 
which bear seeds of unrest from China, from India, from 
the Soviet Union, to the shores of the Mediterranean, 

So it is not by any mean* through the scale of its 
economic or political power, but through the effects, still 
operating, of its great past, through the poamonato con- 
flict of so many forces, and through the typical nature of 
the structural change in every field, that the Levant once 
more attracts our attention to-day and ia once more 
becoming a representative arena for the play of con- 
flicting issues in world history. This region is sparsely 
inhabited ; much of it is desert ; it has lived through 
centuries of neglect and impoverishment. But it seema 
to be inseparably bound up with world history, 



THE ENVIRONMENT 

UNITY OF THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION 

THE cultural unity of the territory of Hellenism and of 
the Eoman empire corresponded to a similarity in the 
physiognomy of the whole country. Amid the manifold 
variety of the landscape and the human types, both from 
country to country and within the various countries, the 
observant traveller who visits Spain and Anatolia, Greece 
and Syria, southern Italy and northern Africa, will be 
surprised at the uniformity he finds in all the Mediter- 
ranean countries in the character of the landscape, in 
the flora, the climate, and the rhythm of human Me, 
The northerner, in his longing for the blue waters, the 
brilliant sunshine, the clear atmosphere, and the pic- 
turesque though dignified nonchalance of the natives, 
is very liable to idealize the country of the South, and 
on the other hand to be disgusted on a closer acquaintance 
with the unfamiliar scene, the dried up rivers and stream- 
lets, the burning sun, the dust, and the dirtiness and 
lack of discipline of the inhabitants. But the dweller in 
any one Mediterranean country will feel at home in any 
of the others; sun and shade, spring and grove, the 
animals and the way of living of the humans will remind 
him of his own homeland. 

Not only have the same influences of soil and climate 
been at work among the people of the Mediterranean 
countries, but the people have been formed by the same 
historic forces. The Phoenicians, and after them the 
Greeks, travelled throughout the Mediterranean in ancient 
times ; Hellenism gave it a cultural unity and the Roman 
empire a legal and political one. This general culture 
was fed from sources contributed by every Mediterranean 
people. In Imperial Rome, where the Stoa taught 
universalism and the unity of the human race, Greeks and 



10 THE ENVIRONMENT 

Berbers, Syrians and Spaniards mingled. The unity of 
the Mediterranean countries provided the basis for the 
spread of Christianity and later of Islam, which in turn 
determined the cultural stamp of the whole region. The 
Church, which had come into existence in the Mediter- 
ranean area, remained a Mediterranean church ; its 
centre of gravity in the Went was Rome ; so soon as 
northern Europe won its emancipation from the 
Mediterranean and rose to intellectual and political world 
dominion, it fell away from Rome ; the centre of gravity 
of the Church in the East was Byzantium, which brought 
civilization to the Slavn as Rome had brought it to the 
Teutons. The Arabs penetrated as far us Spain, where 
for seven centuries they determined the physiognomy 
of the country ; they were only driven out four centuries 
ago. They spread a lingual and cultural unity from 
Asia Minor by way of Malta and Sicily a far a* Gibraltar. 
Later, under Turkish leadership, Islam spread through 
the Balkans and round the shores of the Black Sea ; at 
its zenith the Ottoman empire united the countries 
between Belgrade and Basra and from the (Yimea to 
Tunis. Through their common history the Mediterranean 
countries acquired a unity not only in the character of 
the landscape, but also in the spiritual attitude of the 
people and in social structure. 

In later times also the critical epochs of history were 
common to them all, The (Trusadea brought to the South 
the first flicker of northern aggressiveness ; they were the 
forerunners of the change that reached a symbolic acme 
about 1492 with the discovery of America and the 
expulsion of the last Arabs from Spain. From that 
time onwards the surviving spirit of the Crusades carried 
European adventurousness in another direction. In 
spite of centuries of effort, the Crusades failed in the 
Mediterranean and ended in retreat, for the difference in 
civilization between the north-western and the south- 
eastern Mediterranean countries was too slight ; it is 
doubtful, indeed, whether at that time the superiority 
in civilization did not lie on the side of the south-eaat, 



THE ENVIRONMENT g"J9ll 

the Levant. The new Crusades, the journeys of the 
conquistadores across the Atlantic and round Africa, were 
entirely successful, since the difference in civilization 
between their homeland and the new countries was very 
great. The discovery of the world beyond the Atlantic, 
and of that vast ocean, shifted the centre of gravity from 
the Mediterranean to north-western Europe and produced 
a new mental outlook and a new social order. The 
Mediterranean world fell from its world-dominance. The 
mental outlook and the social order of the Mediterranean 
countries were unable to maintain their supremacy. 
Spain and Italy fell into decay, as did the Asiatic and 
African shores of the Mediterranean. The great trade 
routes became deserted. 

Not until three centuries later did the Mediterranean 
re-awaken under Napoleon, himself a Corsican and a man 
of the Mediterranean. His ambition was to be the first 
to restore by conquest the old unity of the Mediterranean, 
to re-open the old trade routes, and through his campaign 
to shake Egypt and Syria, Italy and Spain out of their 
lethargy. The first signs of renaissance in the Mediter- 
ranean countries date back to Napoleon the activity of 
Mehemet Ali in Egypt and Syria, the Greek war of 
independence, the Eisorgimento in Italy, and the assembly 
of the Cortes in Cadiz in 1812. From that time the 
influence of the mental outlook and the social order of the 
people of north-western Europe began to penetrate the 
Mediterranean region. 

The various stages in the process of Europeanization 
were reached with varying speeds. England, the outpost 
of north-western Europe, was the first non-Mediterranean 
Power to gain controlling influence in the Mediterranean, 
French the language of a country adjoining the 
Mediterranean but centring historically and geographically 
in the lie de France, belonging to north-western Europe, 
and primarily concerned not with the Mediterranean but 
with the Atlantic became the language of culture and 
of political and commercial relations, in place of Italian, 
which had predominated up to the seventeenth century. 



12 THE ENVIRONMENT 

In the nineteenth century, however, this Europeaniza* 
tion remained no more than a thin film, embracing an 
almost infinitesimal upper stratum. Beneath it the life of 
the people in Spain and Turkey, southern Italy and 
Egypt, Greece and Persia remained substantially un- 
influenced in its traditional character. Not until after the 
World War were there any attempts to effect a more 
thorough Europeanimtion of the life of the masses in the 
Mediterranean countries, in Spain through the revolution 
of 1930, in southern Italy by Fascism, in Turkey by 
Mustapha Kemal, and in Persia by Reza Shah. This 
process, however, is going on uniformly all round the 
Mediterranean, though on a varying wale, and is leaving 
unaltered the unity of character of the whole region. 



PHYSIOGRAPHY 

The Mediterranean stretches from west to oast an the 
central region of the Old World. At its eastern end it 
divides into two arms. The north-eastern one IB formed 
by the Aegean and the Black Sea and continued by the 
Caspian ; the south-eastern one IB formed by the levant 
Sea and continued by the Red Sea and the Persian (Jtilf. 
The long coastline of Turkey is washed by the Levant Hca f 
the Aegean, and the Black Sea ; Syria and Palestine are 
coast lands of the Levant Sea, and tbe river-oasis of Kgypt 
opens into the Mediterranean. These four cowi trios 
directly adjoin the Mediterranean and have their full part 
in it. But their importance in history and at the present 
day as transit countries is given to them by their hinter- 
land, which provided from the earliest times and to-day 
again provides the connecting link with Asia ; Iraq on the 
Persian Gulf, central and southern Arabia between the 
Persian Gulf and the Red Sea, and Iran (Persia) between 
the Persian Gulf and the Caspian. AH the importance of 
Marseilles and later of Genoa and Venice in the northern 
Mediterranean rested on the fact that by means of their 
hinterland, the Rhone valley and the valley of the Po f 
they provided the means of communication with Europe, 



THE ENVIRONMENT 13 

so in the past and in our own day the cities of the Levant 
have controlled world trade with Asia through their 
connection with their hinterland, with the shores of the 
Persian Gulf and the Red Sea. 

This region around the Levant Sea is bounded on the 
north by a girdle of highlands which rise gradually from 
,the Ionic shore of the Aegean and run from west to east 
into the mountain country of Anatolia, Armenia, and 
Persia between the Black Sea and the Caspian, and on the 
south from the Levant Sea to the Persian Gulf. Anatolia 
is a highland surrounded by high mountains except in the 
west ; its centre is a depression without an outlet, and has 
become a salt steppe. The plateau attains its greatest 
height in the east, and falls away toward the west. At its 
highest point it passes into the Armenian highlands, the 
topmost peak of which, Ararat, rises to 16,920 feet ; these 
highlands, with their deep ravines and rich meadows, 
form an excellent grazing country. The mountain chains 
running out from the ranges on the borders of Anatolia 
divide the country into a number of almost inaccessible 
regions. They offer great obstacles to transport, but 
along the coasts and through the passes there have always 
been important routes leading to the Aegean, to Cilicia and 
to Armenia, making Asia Minor a transit country between 
west and east. Through it the Persians marched into 
Greece and Alexander the Great into Persia, and through 
it in our own day Europeanizing influences are finding 
their way eastwards and southwards into Asia. 

The tableland of Iran, united with Anatolia by 
Armenia, is cut up by mountain chains which meet along 
the shores, enclosing between them a highland country 
split up into several basins* The highest mountain in 
Iran, Demavend, south of the Caspian, attains a height of 
18>600 feet. In Iran, as in Anatolia, there are basins with 
no outlet, in which there are many salt lakes, often dried 
up in summer* 

South of this highland girdle lies the great Libyan 
desert tableland, Syria and Palestine form a country of 
mountains and deep valleys between the Mediterranean 



16 THE ENVIRONMENT 

are known as khamsin, in north Africa simoon, in south 
Spain leveche, and in Italy and Greece scirocco. The sky 
becomes of a leaden colour, the air unendurably dust- 
laden, the horizon, generally so clear, is hazy with water 
vapour, and the parching effect of these winds withers 
the plants. The night brings no coolness, and the sultry 
atmosphere makes sleep impossible. 

Entirely different is the winter time. The first rains 
to fall in the autumn, the Biblical " showers that water 
the earth ", cover the land with green. The time of sowirg^ 
comes ; water begins to collect and flow. But the wint '< 
is not exclusively a rainy period. Splendid days of mil 
sunny weather alternate with days of rain ; rain lasting 
all day is comparatively rare ; winter is largely spring* 
like. Often there is no rain for weeks, or rain in insuffi- 
cient quantity. These frequent and dreaded periods 
of drought in the Mediterranean region bring shortage 
of water and harvest failures. Of great importance to the 
crops are the late rains, which ripen the grain. In the 
winter there are also occasional frosts, and in the high 
mountain regions, in the Lebanon, in Asia Minor, and in 
Iran with its more continental climate, snow lies for many 
weeks a yard deep and makes railways and roads impass- 
able. The more low-lying regions seldom or never see 
snow ; if it comes it melts away as a rule after a short 
time. In places like Jerusalem, which is over 2,000 feet 
above sea level, the snow lies for several days in some 
years, though only rarely. The Mediterranean thus has 
no really cold season, except in its highland girdle ; never- 
theless inadequate heating often makes the winter a very 
uncomfortable period. 

The landscapes of the south are very attractive. The 
air is clear and transparent, and the wealth and purity 
of colours constantly delight the eye of the observer. 
On the other hand, there is little or none of the gentle 
transitions and shadings to which the central European 
is accustomed, the streamlets and woods and meadows of 
his homeland. Nature ia rich in sharp and sudden tran- 
sitions. Summer and winter follow one another without 



THE ENVIRONMENT 17 

any definite spring or autumn, day and night without 
the long hours of twilight. Unknown are the long snug 
winter evenings, unknown the short summer nights; 
,aU contrasts are abrupt, without the imperceptible 
/merging through intermediate stages. 
' Nowhere are springs of such importance and water 
courses so sought after as in the Mediterranean region. 
Villages crowd around springs and wells where they are 
not built on mountain slopes or like fortresses on hilltops, 
for security or in order to avoid malaria. The streams 
often flow only periodically; characteristic are the 
wadis, which have water in them only for quite a short 
time after rainfall and are then like foaming mountain 
streams, but quickly dry up again and are then nothing 
but wide beds of stones destitute of water or with nothing 
but an almost invisible trickle of water. The water 
resources arc also sapped by evaporation. In the steppes 
and deserts the few springs are surrounded by lusciously 
green oases, which stand out sharply without any 
transition, like miracles, from the cheerless surrounding 
barrenness. In towns and villages the rain water is 
collected in cisterns ; if there is little rainfall the crops 
wither and man and beast go thirsty. The mountain 
slopes are bare, deforested through thousands of years 
of felling in order to build ships, of wartime ravaging, 
and of the destruction of the young growth by goats, 
which will chew up anything, Thus one very frequently 
meets with a naked rock which is clothed only for a short 
period in spring in a many-coloured carpet embroidered 
with a fairylike wealth of flowers. The deforestation 
is also answerable for the slowness of the formation of 
soil : when arable land has once become desert, usually 
through historic events, its past productivity is restored 
only with great difficulty and after heavy expenditure of 
labour and capital. 

An exception in this general Mediterranean climate 
is formed by the coastal mountains of southern Arabia 
with their ample raiaf all in summer, and by the tropical 
climatic enclaves along the south-eastern ooast of the 



18 THE ENVIRONMENT 

Black Sea and the southern coast of the Caspian, where 
rain falls in quantities throughout the year, and where, 
in consequence, the vegetation is tropical and the uncul- 
tivated land is covered with ever-damp virgin forest. 

THE FLORA 

Apart from these climatic enclaves, in which coffee 
and tea thrive, the flora of the Mediterranean region is 
as uniform as the climate. Nature has no winter sleep ; 
vegetables and grasses flourish most luxuriantly in winter | 
and spring; most of the trees are evergreen, and the 
type of growth most frequently found is that of trees 
like the olive and the laurel, whose tough leaves afford 
protection against evaporation. The date palm is typical 
of only a few districts ; it bears fruit in the sandy soil of , 
Mesopotamia, south Palestine, Arabia, southern Iran, 
and Egypt, often being planted in extensive, spacious 
groves. The typical plants of commercial importance 
in the Mediterranean region are either indigenous, like 
grain, vines, olives and fig trees, or have been introduced, 
as rice and the various sorts of citrus, from the monsoon 
regions of Asia, and tobacco and maize from America, 
Grain and olives are of primary importance as food for the 
simple countryman ; bread, with onions or garlic, forms 
his daily food, and the olive supplies him with the fats 
represented by butter in northern regions. As the grain 
is sown at the coming of the early rains and harvested 
at the beginning of the dry period, it can be stored and 
threshed in the open, in contrast to northern usage. In 
the Mohammedan countries in particular the grapes are 
dried after the harvest, being converted into raisins on 
open baxn floors. In many parts the mulberry tree is 
planted for silkworm culture ; in others, cotton, which 
like citrus trees and rice requires artificial irrigation. 
Agricultural labour is often carried on with great intensity, 
and in the neighbourhood of the towns and in many 
alluvial plains by horticultural methods, with minute 
attention to each plant. The mountain slopes are made 



THE ENVIRONMENT 19 

cultivable by a laborious construction of terraces; as a 
rule every inch of soil is utilized, even soil which would 
hardly seem worth cultivating by the ordinary European 
methods. 

The Mediterranean flora differs from that of northern 
Europe in the absence of woods. There are forests in the 
Mediterranean region, but they are not the fairy woods of 
central Europe with their damp moss, their running water, 
their thick carpet of green, the rustling leafage underfoot, 
and the twilight gloom amid the tall, crowded trunks, 
where goblins and fairies can play. The Mediterranean 
forest is not dense ; the trees are at a distance from one 
another, without undergrowth ; everywhere the clear, 
bright light penetrates. The timber is oak of various 
sorts, pines, and cypresses. But more frequent than 
these sparse and airy woods, in the Mediterranean basin 
and especially in the countries of the Levant, are isolated 
trees, often miles apart from one another. These are 
pine, oak, the wild olive, sycamore, and terebinth. 



THE FAUNA 

The fauna is as uniform as the flora. There are the 
little animals met with in all the Mediterranean countries, 
which impress the traveller in various ways the graceful 
gecko, or house-lizard, which becomes an appreciated 
inmate of the home, and the feared scorpion, whose sting 
causes severe and long-continued pain; the harmless- 
looking locust, whose immense swarms, to-day as in 
Biblical times, threaten whole countries, and the cicadas, 
whose song rises in the stillness of summer nights ; gnats 
and bugs, which are not unknown in northern Europe, 
but often reveal in the Levant, under the stimulat- 
ing influence of the sun, a persistency and endurance of 
which they fortunately do not seem capable in northern 
countries. More important, however, than the lower 
animals are the mammals. Dog and cat are comrades 
of man and inmates of his home here as elsewhere, 
but they are rougher and wilder, more timorous and 



20 THE ENVIRONMENT 

mistrustful, as the people of the Mediterranean rarely 
treat them with affection. On the other hand, the people 
rarely interfere with them ; only in recent years has 
there been some action to combat the plague of ownerless 
cats and dogs. The donkey is much more common than 
in Europe. It is one of the most useful animals, patient 
and intelligent, and gains from closer acquaintance. 
Often its frame seems small and frail, but it carries heavy, 
loads and is everywhere the mount of the poorer classes, 
where the horse is the mount of the richer. Mule and, 
hinny are frequently found as mounts and beasts of bur-jj 
den, especially the mule, the offspring of a male ass and d* 
mare, which has all the endurance and more than thA 
strength of the donkey. The camel, in the Near East, 
the one-humped dromedary, is not only the Bedouin's 
mount but until recent times has been one of the most 
important beasts of burden of the caravan routes and 
tracks for pack animals. It is an extraordinarily powerful 
animal, and can carry heavy burdens with ease. Every- 
where outside the desert it is now replaced by the motor 
lorry, but the tourist may still meet the heavy-laden 
camel caravans which come into the streets at night, 
led by drivers who precede them on asses ; the camels' 
bells are heard long before the caravans come into sight. 
The ox is much less common than in northern Europe, 
It is used almost exclusively as a beast of burden, rarely 
for food. The indigenous oxen are very different from 
the European breeds of cattle ; they often have a woeful 
appearance ; they are small and lean because they are 
ill-fed. There is no rich pasture, no hay, and no stall* 
feed ; in the dry season especially the oxen have to make 
do with such sparse and withered vegetation as they can 
find. Thus sheep and goats are much more important 
than the ox. When the people of the Levant eat meat, 
a thing the masses do only on feast-days, they oat mutton 
or fowl. But while oxen and fowls seem skinny and of 
poor breed in comparison with the European, sheep and 
goats are noticeable not only from their number but often 
on account of their splendid condition. They are the 



THE ENVIRONMENT 21 

principal animals bred for profit. Goats' milk and goats' 
cheese are the food of the masses, and sheep's and goats' 
wool is spun for their clothing; the famous Angora 
goats of Turkey yield mohair. 

Stock-raising has a different significance in the 
countries around the south-eastern Mediterranean from 
that which it has in Europe, In Europe it proceeds hand 
in hand with tillage ; the farmer is also a cattle breeder ; 
horned cattle, which are principally bred, play a funda- 
mental part in farming. The case is different in the 
Mediterranean countries, where sheep and goats play no 
part in peasant agriculture. The herdsmen there are a 
separate occupational group, plainly marked off from 
the agriculturists ; they feed their flocks in spring along 
the border between the fruitful land and the desert, where 
the steppes turn into green pasturage ; in summer they 
make for the highlands and mountains, where there is 
more water and the highland meadows provide food for 
their animals. In Europe, where large cattle are 
principally kept and are fed in the stall, the farmer obtains 
ample supplies of dung for his fields. There is nothing 
of this in the breeding of the small cattle of the Levant. 
Little use is made of dung ; it is mostly dried and used 
as fuel. The conflict between settled agriculturists and 
the nomad or semi-nomad herdsmen, to whom the 
patriarchs of the Bible belonged, has governed the history 
of the Near East* This immemorial conflict becomes 
specially acute along the border of the arable land, where 
it is complicated by the competition for springs and 
wells, Cain's murder of Abel bears witness to this 
immemorial conflict. In the early times of the Old 
Testament it was the shepherd and the goatherd who 
represented the peaceful element. " Abel was a keeper of 
sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground*" It was the 
tiller of the soil whose wrath rose up and who became 
a rover and a fugitive* 

Thus in their general features the countries around the 
Mediterranean have a unity of character in respect of 
landscape and climate, fauna and flora* In this region 



22 THE ENVIRONMENT 

man was set down, and through the life of generations he 
became one with it. The history of this region and of the 
historic forces which had their play within it became 
his history. Without a knowledge of the broad lines of 
this history, of its community with the West and its 
divergence from it, it is impossible to understand the 
mental and social bases of the existence of the people 
of the Near East and their incorporation in the 
new universality which is spreading out from Europe in 
our day, 



MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT IN HISTORY 

ANCIENT TIMES 

WHETHER the first home of all civilization, the place of 
origin of the higher forms of agriculture, of cattle breeding 
and of the plough, is to be found in Mesopotamia, whether 
it was from there that these arts spread across southern 
Arabia into the Nile valley and across the Persian Gulf 
to southern and eastern Asia, is likely to be difficult for 
research ever to establish beyond question. But the 
matter is of no importance as an aid to understanding 
the present day. Even the civilizations of Babylonia and 
Egypt, with which their monuments have made us 
familiar, are of much more interest to the modern 
European and convey much more to his imagination 
than they do to that of the present-day inhabitants of 
those countries. The Egyptians and the Iraqi sometimes 
look with curiosity* but never with any sense of spiritual 
community, at the treasures which European science has 
brought to light, treasures which Europe's wealth has 
made accessible and which have deeply influenced 
European aesthetics and art, The latest descendants of 
the creators and artificers of these monuments of religion 
and art no longer feel any vital community with those 
past epochs* Only under European influence have they 
begun of late to feel pride in the origin of their race, but 
this too is a part of the process of their Europeanization, 
not the revival of an inheritance and not a spontaneous 
feeling. 

So much of the religious and intellectual traditions of 
these old cultures as has lived on into later epochs, had 
to be re-cast and re-moulded in the syncretistic culture of 
Hellenism, Only one of the older cultures was able to 
maintain its creative individual existence against Hellen- 
ism and against the humanism of the Roman, empire, 

8 



24 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

and to carry its historic continuity in unbroken vitality 
down to the present day. This was the most meagre 
of the important cultures in monuments, in artistic 
expression, and in splendour, that of the small and poor 
Judaic mountain country ; a culture which in its unique 
and extreme historic consciousness overcame the limita- 
tions of time and space by means of its concentration on 
religious and ethical thought. But this culture too 
attained its importance in world history from the fact 
that through the Septuagint, Philo, and Paul, it became 
merged, in Hellenistic intellectual garb, into the unity 
of the expiring ancient world. 

The Greeks were originally under the influence of the 
civilizations, already highly developed, of the Oriental 
river oases. Old legends describe the journey of civiliza- 
tion from the eastern shore of the Levant Sea into the 
Aegean. The alphabet came from the Phoenicians, 
who, founding Carthage, also transplanted the civilization 
of the Levant to northern Africa and the western 
Mediterranean. Europe, according to Greek mythology, 
was the daughter of a Phoenician king ; Zeus carried 
her off to Crete, where she became the mother of Minos, 
the first of the Aegean rulers. The home of Greek 
philosophy was Miletus, in Asia Minor, then one of the 
foci of the Levant, an outpost of Babylonian-Assyrian 
civilization, where Thales appropriated the wisdom and 
knowledge of the East and developed it, as a disciple of 
Babylonia, Egypt, and Phoenicia. Karl Joel attributes 
Thales' success in raising their philosophy to a higher 
level to the fact that Greece was politically a small and 
weak state : the Greek spirit owes its eminence in the 
same way as the Judaic to the limitations imposed on a 
nation by the lack of power. " The whole of the wealth 
of the East, which called for supervision, circulation, 
synthesis, and control of great masses, lived on here in 
the brain of a citizen of Hellas without any opportunity 
of mass application, and therefore the more inwardly and 
spiritually. The urge towards unity and comprehensive- 
ness, which he was unable to satisfy politically in face of 



IN HISTORY 25 

the particularism around him, sought satisfaction in the 
intellectual field, in the idea of the unity of the world ; 
the mathematical art grew amid the modest circumstances 
beyond practical needs into an abstract science, pursued 
for its own sake as a field of action for the superfluity of 
intellectual energy. He controlled all the world's wealth 
of change with the high hand of the Oriental despots of 
the time, with the unifying force which he demanded in 
vain for Ionia, and so there arose out of disappointed and 
checked practical activity the first theory. 5 ' In the age 
of the foundation of great empires and of the emergence 
of dominant personalities in the East, the mind celebrated 
its triumphs in Judah and in Hellas as a result of the 
powerlessness and pettiness of its environment. 

But in political life the Greeks evolved an attitude 
which the East has lacked down to our own day, and 
which was the basis of the great superiority of Europe, 
the heir of Greece in this respect, in the field of political 
ethics the sense of free citizenship. Heinrich Gomperz 
may or may not be right in finding the central idea of 
Greek ethics in the ideal of inward freedom, but the free 
citizen, inwardly depending on himself, whose criterion 
is self-knowledge, is the victory of Greece, of the Ionic 
coast of Asia Minor, over the power of the East which 
then held sway over it. This Greek spirit of citizenship, 
first represented by the sages of Ionia, finds its culminating 
point in Socrates, the individual who resisted the mass 
of the people, " the first entirely free man on this earth, 
not because he set himself like the Sophists above all 
laws and conventional valuations, but because he formed 
valuations anew in his mind, because he contained the 
law in himself and was the first man who in self-rule 
created personality." (Karl JoeL) 

The first Greek to take up the empire-building idea of 
the Oriental monarchies was the Macedonian semi- 
barbarian Alexander, who had been brought up under the 
influence of Greek intellectual training. Under this 
influence the empire he founded proved much more 
of a spiritual power than all its predecessors. It brought 



26 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

Greek thought and knowledge to the East ; it absorbed 
the wisdom and the myths of the East and gave them 
sharpness of conceptual definition ; but it did not 
succeed in giving the East the Greek concept of citizen- 
ship and liberty ; Greece herself had not the strength left 
for this. In the countries of the Levant, down to the 
present day, the Bedouin has been able to show a sense of 
freedom and a primitive democracy with nobility in its 
attitude, but the townsman has not ; public life in these 
countries suffers to this day from this inferiority in 
political character of the settled population. The 
Hellenism which flourished in the Levant was no longer 
of the Greek pattern but a hybrid civilisation, Hellas 
rationalized the Near East, but Greek thought returned 
to the bondage of quasi-myth from which it had once 
been liberated at Miletus. 

On another plane there recurred in the world port of 
Hellenism, Alexandria, the contact between the Hellenic 
and the Oriental spirit which had taken place once at 
Miletus. Greek philosophy, which had arisen out of the 
East, finally dissolved again into it. A Hellenism which 
had adopted the wisdom of the priests and the cult of the 
mysteries of the East, and had come into touch with 
Judaism at Alexandria, became for many centuries the 
cultural basis of the countries of the Levant* In the 
world empire of Alexander the Great, which had embraced 
the Levant and all its hinterland from the Bosphorus to 
the Indus and the Nile, the idea of catholicity had for the 
first time materialized, Alexander took Oriental princesses 
as wives and ordered his generals and soldiers to marry 
eastern women. His empire proclaimed the equality of 
its races and made an end of the conflicts between its 
peoples. It provided a common ground for understand- 
ing, a vast basin into which the various streams of progress 
could debouch, Alexander and the Diadochi who shared 
the succession to his empire aimed at the maintenance of 
Greek culture as the basis of this catholicity ; wherever 
Alexander came he founded Greek cities with Greek civil 
rights as the moral pillars of his power. But the Greek 



IN HISTORY 27 

spirit was unable to maintain itself in this vast expansion. 
The Greek element was swamped in Hellenism and 
languished in its original home. 

Gradually, with the growing activity and boldness of 
navigators, who ventured more and more away from the 
coasts, and as their ships grew in size were able to remain 
day and night on the seas without continually returning 
to port, Greece with her bays and islands lost her world 
importance as a neighbour of the Levant. It was now 
possible for Carthage and Rome to carry on the world 
trade with the Levant direct from the western basin of 
the Mediterranean. Rome took over from Hellas her 
importance as a trade centre and also, a thing of still 
greater importance, her ideal of free citizenship. Under 
Greek influence the primitive Roman virtus advanced to 
humanitas ; Rome took over the succession to Alexander 
in a still more comprehensive oecumene. She became a 
world city in which there were brought together not only 
the treasures but the civilizations of the whole world. 
Rome's situation in the centre of the world of her day 
favoured her. The Italian peninsula divides the Mediter- 
ranean into two as it runs from north-west to south-east ; 
its south-eastern extremity looks out at the Levant, and 
in Sicily it has a bridge to Africa. Thus Italy's maritime 
cities became the great transhipment centres for goods 
sent via the Levant from the East to Europe ; they have 
remained so to this day. Rome herself lies in the centre 
of Italy, where the road west of the Apennines crosses the 
Tiber. Her situation made it easy for Rome to hold her 
empire together. 

But Alexandria, whither after his death the remains 
of Alexander the Great were borne, remained the intel- 
lectual centre of the empire, and was also a close second to 
Rome as a trade centre, Alexandria was the seat of 
Hellenistic philosophy, poetry, and science. Here was 
the Museum, the foremost university of ancient times, and 
here what was until quite recent times the greatest 
library the world has known contained the treasures of 
the world's literature* This city saw a period when 



28 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

Jewish, philosophy flourished, and after it Christian 
philosophy ; here the Church fought the greatest intel- 
lectual movement of the expiring ancient world, now 
become oecumenical Gnosis, which " sought to over- 
come dualism by intermingling the truths of the Christian 
faith with Oriental mythology and Greek speculation, 
and so to found a universal religious view of life embracing 
the truth of all existing religions and philosophies." 
(Arthur Drews.) Since Alexander's expeditions, science 
had conquered new fields : reports from foreign countries 
had been accumulated, expeditions sent out to distant 
lands and seas, and the many observations of geographical 
and sociological facts surveyed. Through Alexandria 
there streamed the trade from India and southern 
Arabia, proceeding from the Bed Sea down the arms of 
the Nile. 

With the fall o* Alexandria after the Arab conquest of 
Egypt, Egypt ceased in its turn to be a main channel of 
world trade ; it lost contact with the Mediterranean and 
fell into isolation. Alexandria remained for centuries a 
small outlying town of a few thousand inhabitants. Not 
until the French and English armies were opposed to one 
another near Alexandria in 1801 did this town again 
attract attention, becoming of importance to those who 
were concerned to bring Egypt out of her isolation and 
open her up once more as a trade route from southern Asia 
to the Mediterranean. The awakener of modern Egypt, 
Mehemet Ali, recognized the importance of Alexandria, 
connected it with the Nile in 1820 by the Mahmudia 
Canal, and made it Europe's gateway to the Nile valley 
and the starting point of the route to India for half a 
century, until the completion of the Suez CanaL 

To-day as in ancient times Alexandria is a chief centre 
of the Greek dispersion. The Greeks have remained in 
modern as in ancient times an extremely shrewd trading 
people, and for that reason have not always been popular, 
Greek colonies, spread in ancient times through southern 
Russia and as far as the borders of India, in Mesopotamia, 
and in Spain, dominated the exchange of commodities on 



IN HISTORY 29 

the great trade routes. At the beginning of the nine- 
teenth century the great Greek colonies in Odessa and 
Constantinople, Alexandria and Marseilles, Manchester 
and Liverpool, were the agents for the grain trade 
between the Black Sea and north-west Europe and for the 
export of British cotton goods to the Levant. With the 
aid of the wealth they accumulated, these Greeks of the 
diaspora promoted the development of Greek national 
consciousness and the wars of liberation in their entirely 
impoverished and decayed homeland. Their Greek 
patriotism is live and ardent to this day. In all the ports 
and cities of the Levant they form the core of the popula- 
tion known as Levantine ; they engage in wholesale and 
retail trading and agency business. In Alexandria 
to-day they form the strongest non-Egyptian nationality. 
A rival of Alexandria as an outpost of the Levant and 
an entrepot centre for world trade was the Greek colony 
founded a little later at Antioch, in a fertile plain on the 
left bank of the Orontes in northern Syria. This spot was 
the junction of the routes leading from the Euphrates and 
from the northern highlands to the Mediterranean. 
Antioch was far behind Alexandria in cultural importance, 
but its geographical situation was much more favourable 
than that of the Egyptian port, which lay far from the 
natural overland lines of communication. Antioch's 
population seems to have had from the first the mixed 
character of the Levantine trade centres; the wealth 
and the morals of the city were famous, though hardly 
of good fame. Antioch also formed the first and greatest 
Gentile Christian community of early times. It was the 
seat of one of the four patriarchates of the Eastern Church, 
Constantinople, Alexandria, and Jerusalem being the 
three others* On account of its situation and impor- 
tance the patriarchate of Antioch became known as the 
patriarchate of Asia. With the decline of the ancient 
civilization the importance of Antioch dwindled away ; 
its place in relation to the hinterland was taken by Aleppo 
and Damascus, both of which were better situated from 
the point of view of the new rulers of the country, on the 



30 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

border of the desert ; and the connection with the West 
passed to the ports of the old Phoenician coast. 

Alexandria and the region around Antioch, the great 
entrepot centres of ancient times in Egypt and Syria, have 
shown by their revived importance that the new trade 
routes of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, following 
geographical laws, have returned to the old routes of world 
traffic. The third important Hellenistic city, Seleucia, 
on the Tigris, has similarly shown that there are places 
which, though political changes or changes in methods of 
transport may turn them into backwaters for centuries, 
again and again return through their geographical 
situation to their old importance. According to Pliny, 
Seleucia had 600,000 inhabitants in his day ; it was a 
Greek settlement at no great distance from the spot at 
which Babylon, the first world-city of history and the 
sacred city of western Asia, had stood on the Euphrates 
for thousands of years, until the year in which its last 
remaining inhabitants were transferred to Seleucia* 

The importance of these cities, and later of Baghdad, 
which was founded in the neighbourhood of their sites 
by the Abbasid Khalifs, depended not only on the fertility 
which irrigation assured to Mesopotamia but above all 
to the fact that they formed entrepots for trade and 
consequently centres of industrial crafts. During the 
eighteenth century industry developed wherever there 
were sources of raw material and of motive power, especi- 
ally coal; but before the Industrial Revolution industry 
had settled wherever commerce assembled the goods 
of various countries on its few great routes, so giving a 
field for wealth and enterprise and knowledge of the 
world and of market opportunities, 

Baghdad entered into the inheritance of Babylon and 
Seleucia. At the time of Haroun-al-Rashid it was said 
to have two million inhabitants. The trade routes from 
China and India led through Mesopotamia to the Syrian 
coast except when the prosperity of Alexandria was at its 
height, after the fall of Babylon and before the growth of 
Baghdad; during that period the trade was diverted 



IN HISTORY 31 

from the Mesopotamian route through the Red Sea and 
from the Syrian ports to those of the Nile valley. Baghdad 
in its time was the centre of Islam, which played in 
world civilization and world trade the part played later by 
Christianity. Baghdad, like Babylon, was an industrial 
centre and world-famed for the beauty and costliness 
of its richly-dyed cloths. With the breaking over the 
Levant of the storms of Mongol migration and the 
desertion of the trade routes in the " dark ages ", Baghdad 
fell into decay as Alexandria and Antioch had done before 
it. Only at the present day has it re-awakened to new life 
with the revival of the old routes. 



THE END OF THE ANCIENT WORLD 

For nearly 1,600 years Byzantium, the new Rome, 
was the capital of the Levant, the seat of the imperial 
power on which all the countries of the Levant were 
dependent. It was the centre of the first great Christian 
Power and subsequently of the last great Mohammedan 
one. It was originally a Greek colony, and with its excel- 
lent natural harbour it lay in a situation of unique advan- 
tage, commanding the routes from the Black Sea to the 
Mediterranean and from Europe to Asia. When the 
centre of gravity of the Roman empire, and therewith 
of the world, shifted back from the west to the east, 
Byzantium was the natural capital. It was chosen as 
capital by Constantine I, who gave it his name ; from 
A.D. 330 Constantinople was the capital of the Roman 
empire. Here Roman law was completed and con- 
summated, and here Christian dogma was first elaborated* 
While in the west the Roman empire fell to pieces under 
the onslaughts of the Teutons, and civilization perished, 
in the east, the first home of civilization, empire and 
civilization continued to exist. But the empire was 
no longer an oecumene, no longer orbis terramm; the 
peoples of forest and steppe had advanced into it, and 
in the east it faced a new Power the old Power with which 
Hellas and Alexander the Great had fought, Persia. 



32 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

Since the times of Cyrus and of Darius the Persian kings 
had arrogated to themselves the title of " king of all 
civilized countries ", right down to our own time. The 
Persians have never entirely lost the sense of being a 
Great Power, and even the Hellenistic empire of the 
Seleucids and the Parthians had adopted the national 
Persian civilization and customs, until in 224 B.C. a 
national Persian dynasty, the Sassanids, re-ascended the 
throne. While the Roman empire under Constantine 
became Christian, the national faith of Zoroastrianism 
continued to hold sway in Persia; the king was the 
representative of Ormuzd ; the priesthood, the Magi, 
were the controlling element, and there was severe 
persecution of Christians. The conflict between the two 
States thus became a conflict between the two great 
religions. Both States had later to yield before a new 
Great Power, bearer of a new religion, which overran 
them from central Arabia. The Roman empire, confined 
mainly to Byzantium and Hellas, was able to continue in 
existence, robbed of its old splendour, for a few more 
centuries, but Persia and Zoroastrianism collapsed 
entirely, the State for many centuries (in the fifteenth 
century a new national dynasty, the Safawids, rose to 
power), the religion for all time. 

However much territory the Roman empire might 
sacrifice under the onslaughts of the barbarians, the 
Roman Emperor still sat on his throne in Constantinople, 
and the succession of emperors followed without a break 
from Augustus to Constantine XI (1453). Until A.D. 800 
there was only one Empire, only one Imperium ; in that 
year the Pope took advantage of the circumstance that 
after the death of Constantine VI in 797 a woman, Irene, 
became Empress, to confer the imperial crown on 
Charlemagne. From then on there were an eastern and 
a western Imperium, but until the eleventh century the 
eastern remained the more powerful, until the twelfth 
Constantinople remained the wealthiest commercial centre 
in the world, and the Byzantine empire remained, until 
its end, amid all the changes in its character, the legitimate 



IN HISTORY 33 

successor of Rome. Its Senate was formally vested with 
the same power and authority as in Imperial Rome, and 
the Byzantine emperors were chosen, like those of Rome, 
by the Senate. In the Byzantine empire the Roman 
idea of the State lived on ; the legislation, the adminis- 
tration, the military system, and the extraordinarily 
high level of strategic science continued the Roman 
traditions. The very inhabitants of the empire, the 
Greeks, called themselves Rhomaioi, and retained this 
appellation in the Turkish empire, in which they were 
called Rumi, until our own day. The name " Hellene " 
had a depreciatory flavour. Hellenes were heathen. 
Not until the time of the Greek liberation movement of 
the nineteenth century was the old name proudly revived, 
in memory of the pre-Roman, pre-Christian epoch. 

Constantinople was the new Rome, and the political 
elevation of Constantinople as the Imperial capital over 
old Rome was followed by the attempt of the Patriarch of 
Constantinople to secure equality of standing with the 
Bishop of Rome. The division between East and West 
in the empire was repeated in the church. Until the death 
of Athanasius in 373, Alexandria had maintained ecclesias- 
tical hegemony in the East. After that the predominance 
went to Constantinople. The Patriarch of Constantinople 
was only primus inter pares, but he was the first, the 
Patriarch of the Imperial city, the oecumenical Patriarch. 
The Emperor of Constantinople naturally favoured the 
Constantinople Patriarch ; the creation of the States of 
the Church out of territories which formed parts of the 
Roman Imperial possessions administered by the 
Byzantine exarch in Ravenna, and the creation of a new 
Western Imperial seat, of necessity widened the breach 
between Rome and Byzantium. Over against the 
oecumenical empire and patriarchate of Byzantium there 
emerged in Rome another empire and church, both of 
which also claimed universality. So the hatred constantly 
grew between Rome and the East. The final parting 
between the two Apostolic and Catholic churches, the 
tearing apart of Christianity, in 1064, was only the 



34 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

external completion of a deep cleavage based on race, 
civilization, and geographical tradition. 

With the onslaught of Islam the Byzantine empire 
lost its eastern provinces. Within less than ten years the 
Near East was revolutionized. Khaled, the great general 
of the first Khalif , Abu Bekr, made a simultaneous attack 
on eastern Rome and Persia, and under the second Khalif , 
Omar, Syria and Iraq, Egypt and Persia, fell into the 
hands of the Arabians. New towns, originally Arabian 
military encampments, were founded Fiistat in Egypt, 
out of which Cairo grew, and Basra and Kufa in Iraq* 
Twice the Arabians laid siege to Constantinople, in 
673-7 and 717-18, but failed to take the city; 500 
years were to pass before it fell into the hands of a 
cruel enemy who came not from the East but from the 
West. 

The loss of the eastern provinces of the Roman empire 
made no change in the character of the empire. It 
remained essentially an admixture of East and West. 
Byzantine art was strongly influenced by the East. The 
plastic, clear stylistic aim of the architecture of the 
ancient Greeks was transformed by the wealth of colour 
of the East ; in place of the austere and simple external 
arrangement there came an imposing and picturesque 
interior style. The Hagia Sophia, built 1,400 years ago, 
is a monument of the new influence of the East in the heart 
of Hellenic civilization. While eastern influence thus 
penetrated Hellas, Hellenism retained its vitality in the 
Near East. c< The Syrian and Mesopotamian art of the 
Christian period is living evidence of the astonishing 
vitality with which Hellenism was filled even after the 
destruction of the ancient world. In the great cities 
along the upper course of the Mesopotamian rivers there 
flourished a purely classicist art. The architectonic 
language of these buildings did not consist of the dark 
glow of mosaics and maxble surfaces, but of the strongly 
outstanding profiles in emulation of the antique, in the 
pillars with their capitals and in the unconcealed 
maaoary." (Samuel Guyer.) 



IN HISTORY 35 

For 2,000 years, in ancient times and during the 
period of decay of the ancient world, the Near East had 
a common cultural basis in Hellenism, which was pene- 
trated by Roman constitutional and legal conceptions 
owing to the setting up of the new Rome in the Byzantine 
empire. The Ottoman empire, strange as the fact may 
seem at first sight, entered upon the inheritance of 
Byzantium as a state and a civilization. The Arabian 
Mohammedans completed and took over the heritage of 
Hellenism. " The spiritual culture of Islam is Islamized 
Hellenism. Christian Syrians, Zoroastrian priests, and 
Gnostics, on Aramaic and Iranian soil, passed on to the 
Muslims the Grecian inheritance. Islam, which from its 
earliest origins and in the spirit of its prophet was capable 
of a greater degree of adjustment to the surrounding 
world than any other religion of redemption, was bound 
under these influences to produce new forms of piety and 
theology. The spiritual culture founded by Hellenism 
reaches in the Near East to the threshold of the present 
times, to the period of the penetration of European 
civilization and science in the last three generations." 
(Hans Heinrich Schader.) The Greek heritage lost its 
vitality in the Near East, so that in later times it was 
unable to bear fresh fruit and exhausted itself in adap- 
tation and interpretation. But by way of the Levant, 
through the penetration of Arabian Islam into Spain and 
Sicily, the intellectual life of the ancient world was saved 
for the West, and there, after the fall of Constantinople, 
it was able to renfew its youth and to flourish in a regained 
spontaneity. 

Hellenism did not reveal in the Levant the power of 
forming and absorbing nations which Rome had in the 
western Mediterranean* The Hellenic language was 
unable to make the conquests which Latin made in the 
western basin of the Mediterranean and Arabic made later 
in Syria, Iraq, and northern Africa. Aramaic, Coptic, 
and other languages held their own against Greek, while 
Gallic and Iberian disappeared entirely before Latin. 
Syrian and Coptic, indeed, were able to hold their own, 



36 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

at least as the languages of religious ceremonial, even 
against Arabic, while Greek disappeared entirely in all 
these countries, in which it had once flourished. " The 
Greeks did not possess that enormous political energy 
and force which enabled the Romans to assimilate foreign 
races ; and they were confronted by sturdy Oriental 
peoples who were by no means so easy to subjugate as 
were the inhabitants of Gaul and Spain." (Carl Krum- 
bacher.) Nevertheless, Hellenism had thrown bridges 
between Baghdad and Constantinople at a time when 
they were centres of the civilized world, the Christian 
and Mohammedan foci of the whole earth, enemies to all 
appearance, and yet, in their mental outlook and in their 
administration of a common -heritage, closely related to 
one another, just as to this day the Christians of the Near 
East are closer in their mentality and their social insti- 
tutions to the Mohammedans than to the Christians of 
the West. 

Thus Byzantium, the new Rome, fell in the end, not 
to the West and North, but to the East and South. As 
the Teutons began to invest old Rome from the moment 
when they awoke to historic consciousness, so the Slavs 
have been trying to capture Constantinople since their 
entry into history. The longing for the southern waters, 
the blue sky, and the old civilization drove the Teutons 
against Rome and the Slavs against Byzantium. Rome 
became for the Teutons and Constantinople for the Slavs 
the imperial city and the religious metropolis. But the 
aim the Teutons achieved, the capture of the Urbs, the 
Slavs pursued in vain. After the faU of Constantinople 
the Tsars of Moscow took over the imperial title (Tsar, 
like Kaiser, means Caesar), and inherited the Caesareo- 
Papism of the Byzantine empire which was characteristic 
of the Eastern church. Moscow felt itself to be the heir 
of Byzantium, the third Rome. From then on the rulers 
of the new Byzantium were unceasingly inspired by the 
ambition to incorporate in their possessions the old 
Byzantium and the old Byzantine empire. As succes- 
sors of the Basileus, they regarded themselves as the 



IN HISTORY 37 

protectors of Orthodox Christianity in the Ottoman 
empire, and this Caesareo-Papistical claim became for 
them, under its modern form of the claim to be a protector 
of the Christian minorities, the powerful lever which in the 
end destroyed the real heir of the Byzantine empire, 
the Ottoman Sultanate. 



THE EASTERN CHUItCH 

The position of the church in regard to the state in the 
Near East was fundamentally different from the position 
in the West. In the West, Pope and Emperor, the 
spiritual and secular powers, faced one another like two 
swords, in combat as equals or the stronger dominating 
the weaker. In the Eastern church, as in Islam and as 
in the Persian empire of the Sassanids, state and church 
formed a single unit like body and soul. In the East the 
Emperor was the head of the church, in the same way as 
the IChalif was a temporal ruler and at the same time the 
commander of all -the Faithful. The Roman Emperor 
presided over the Church Councils or was represented by a 
delegate who was usually a layman ; the resolutions of the 
Councils required his assent to acquire legislative force in 
the empire. The Byzantine Emperor used his influence 
in the election and deposition of the Patriarch. 

This union of state and church provides the 
explanation of many peculiar characteristics of the 
Eastern church. The church did not stand above the 
state but entered into the state or national group and 
filled it. On the other hand, it was dependent on the 
secular organization of state and nation, the political and 
ethnic dividing lines, which determined the organization 
and the dividing lines of the church. The church in the 
West set itself above national distinctions, and the for- 
mation of nations accordingly proceeded originally amid 
a straggle against the church ; in the East the national 
groupings and the national organization of the church 
proceeded in harmony with one another* For this very 
reason there came no schism ; the various national 



38 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

ecclesiastical organizations remained united in faith as 
members of a single Holy Orthodox Apostolic Eastern 
Church. Thus in place of the rigid monarchical unity of 
the Western church there was established a conception 
of synthetic unity, the consciousness of unity in multi- 
formity, a vital sense of cohesion coupled with the con- 
tinuance of an autocephalous or autonomous church in 
each state. The Eastern church was a federation, at the 
head of which stood the four Patriarchs of Constantinople, 
Antioch, Alexandria, and Jerusalem, and the highest 
organ of which was the Synod of Bishops. All these 
churches have developed organically from a single root ; 
they are not alienated from one another although most of 
them use in their liturgy the language of their own country, 
often in an antiquated form. Their inter-association is 
similar to that which developed in the Anglican world- 
church on constitutional and political grounds in the 
course of the nineteenth century. But while this church, 
itself split up into a number of churches with territorial 
autonomy, has possessed since 1867 an organ, the Lambeth 
Conferences which regularly assemble under the presi- 
dency of the Archbishop of Canterbury (promoting 
co-operation and agreement, though they have not the 
authority of an oecumenical synod), the Orthodox church 
has no such organ. Not until after the world war did the 
Oecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople draw up a plan 
for the assembly of a council of the Orthodox churches. 
A preparatory conference assembled in 1930 on Mount 
Athos and a Pro-Synod on the Orthodox Whit-Sunday 
in 1932, to discuss measures for bringing more effectively 
into play in external relations the internal unity of the 
Orthodox church, and for co-operation, with the Western 
church. 

The close connection between nationality and religion 
shows itself still more clearly in the heretical churches of 
the East. It was in theological formulas and dis- 
putations that the independence movements of the 
Egyptians, Syrians, and Mesopotamians found expression 
in opposition to the Greek church of the empire. Ethnical 



IN HISTORY 39 

differences gave the controversies over the godhead of 
Jesus their violence. The Nestorians, who arose in Persia 
and Mesopotamia, came out in opposition to the resolu- 
tions of the fourth Oecumenical Council, held at Chalcedon 
in 451, maintaining the separateness of the godhead and 
the human character in Jesus ; the Monophysites of 
Armenia and Egypt affirmed the oneness of Christ's 
nature, his human character being entirely comprehended 
in his godhead. A later schism was that of the Mono- 
thelites of Syria, who refused to accept the decision of the 
sixth Oecumenical Council (Constantinople, 680) that 
Christ had two wills. These separate national churches, 
in their dissent from Greek Orthodoxy, facilitated the 
conquest of their countries by Islam. Many of these 
schismatic churches exist to this day ; sections of all of 
them, in many cases only small sections, have gone over 
to Rome. 

The Nestorians, some of Aramaic and some of Persian 
national origin and character, attained their maximum 
influence in the eighth century. Out of their ranks came 
the teachers of theology at the court of the Khalif of 
Baghdad ; they sent successful missions to central Asia, 
China, and Ceylon. All that are left of them to-day are 
the few tens of thousands of the ancient national church 
of the Assyrians, a primitive and warlike mountain 
people, who with other national churches of the Near 
East became during the world war a plaything of the 
policy of expansion of the Christian Great Powers. They 
fought against the Turks, were driven out of the territory 
they had inhabited in Urmia, and finally became a trouble- 
some problem for British policy in the north of Iraq and 
for that young State. A section of the Assyrians, the 
Chaldeans of the plain, went over to Borne. 

The Monophysites are still divided into three national 
churches, the Armenian, the Coptic in Egypt, to which 
the Abyssinian Monophysites belong, and the Jacobite 
in Syria, The Monopolistic sect in Syria, the Maronites, 
went over to Rome as long ago as 1182. This union, 
which was finally consummated in the sixteenth century, 



40 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 
had great importance for Christian literature and Christian 
politics in Arabian Syria. Pope Gregory XIII founded 
a Maronite college in Rome in 1584, which sent out many 
men of learning, and the Maronite Christians of Lebanon 
came into contact with the vivifying tendencies of the 
West much earlier than other Christians of the Near East. 

All these churches have their Patriarchs, to whom 
there are often added Patriarchs of those sections which 
have united with Rome. But behind all the external 
pomp and the venerable past of many of the patriarchates 
there is no longer any power at the present day. Even 
the Greek-Orthodox Patriarch of Alexandria in Egypt, 
who to this day bears the title of " Pope, Father of 
Fathers, Shepherd of Shepherds, Archpriestof Archpriests, 
Thirteenth Apostle and Oecumenical Judge, 7 ' has only 
one bishop under him, and in his archdiocese has 
authority over perhaps 20,000 souls. 

Religious and racial considerations also entered into 
the struggle between Constantinople and the West, and 
together dominated every issue and every stage of it. 
The Greek clergy stood at the head of the Byzantine 
nation, which was filled with hatred of the West. The 
Pope of Rome himself pursued his efforts at dogmatic 
union with the Orthodox church both by diplomatic 
and by belligerent means ; his purpose was " to attain 
union by means of an alliance of anti-Byzantine Powers 
of the West, indirectly through the political subjection of 
the Greeks ". The ideal method of attaining his hegemony 
over new Rome seemed to the Pope to be " the conquest 
of eastern Rome by a western petty prince as the leader 
of an international crusading army". This aim was 
attained in 1204. Christian Byzantium fell then into the 
hands not of Mohammedans, but of Catholic Crusaders. 
Their fury was worse than was ever that of the Turks ; the 
Christian churches of Constantinople went up in flames 
or were degraded to stables. u Illustrious Crusaders 
rode on neighing steeds into the Church of St Sophia ; 
others caroused there, drinking wine from the sacred 
vessels, whose consecrated contents they had first poured 



IN HISTORY 41 

out like refuse, while a courtesan mounted the Patriarch's 
throne. They adorned themselves and their women 
with the costly materials of the priests' vestments and 
with the jewels from the sacred utensils. They laid 
barbarous hands on the noble works of ecclesiastical and 
profane art, destroying the tokens of an almost millennial 
culture. Frightful also was the fate of the inhabitants. 
They were mercilessly plundered and massacred, youths 
were sold into slavery, maidens dishonoured. And the 
conquerors had no awe of saintliness : no nun was safe 
from violation, no church afforded protection of life." 
(Walter Norden.) 

It was long before the exasperation and the hatred 
of the West with which these outrages filled the Greek 
community and its church abated. Two centuries later 
the majority of the Byzantines preferred to live under the 
Orescent rather than the Tiara. Turkish rule was 4 4 actually 
made light for them by the consciousness of being 
emancipated in this way from the rule of the Latins ". 
This feeling of alienation between East and West, of 
community of the Eastern church with the East, has 
re-awakened in recent times among many of the Eastern 
churches, since they have had the feeling of being used 
as pawns in the political competition between the 
European States, to be sacrificed regardless of all protests 
when any change in the situation occurs or when they 
have served the required purpose. Max Pribilla, S.J., 
writes : " But just as in Germany there are Protestants 
who went to Versailles rather than accept a tolerable 
peace at the hands of the Pope, so there are also many 
members of the Orthodox faith who would rather suffer 
perdition under Bolsheviks or Turks than be saved at 
the hands of Rome." The concluding part of this dictum 
may be too sweeping, but the mistrust and indeed the 
hatred of the political and religious " Imperialism " of 
the West among various churches of the Near East is 
scarcely less than in Islam, 

In the East the national churches fulfilled the rdle of 
the national state. In a multi-national state each church 



42 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

formed a state within the state. The form of the 
Mohammedan state in the Middle Ages took account of 
this structure : the law of personal status, including the 
law of marriage and inheritance, came under canon law 
and accordingly was administered separately for each 
particular religion ; the church exercised in certain 
defined fields rights of legislation and of administration 
of law which the modern state reserves to itself. The 
Patriarchs and heads of the church in the Near East 
represented the members of their religious community in 
the world outside it ; they were not only ecclesiastical 
but political and juridical leaders of the Faithful, In 
the Ottoman empire historic tradition lent the Patriarch 
of Constantinople a special position ; in the Phanar he 
possessed a court of his own on the Byzantine model. 
He had the assistance not only of a clerical Synod but 
also of a " Permanent National Council " with very strong 
lay representation, which took part in the election of the 
Patriarchs. 

In the Orthodox Greek patriarchate of Constantinople 
the religious and national elements were of identical 
scope ; it became the centre of nationalist Hellenizing 
movements among the Ottoman Christians. The situa- 
tion was different in the Orthodox patriarchates of 
Antioch and Jerusalem. Here the higher clergy were 
Greek and the lower clergy and the laity Arabic, These 
were the only churches in the Near East in which the 
national element had not made its appearance in the 
earlier part of the nineteenth century* This and the 
establishment of the influence of the laity took place in 
the diocese of Antioch in the nineteenth century; in 
Jerusalem the struggle is still proceeding. 

After the world war, British Commissions of Inquiry 
pronounced in favour of the urgently needed reform of 
the administration of the Jerusalem patriarchate, includ- 
ing the admission of the laity to a large share in the 
administration. But on political grounds the British 
administration in Palestine is protecting the privileges 
of the Greek prelates, who are united in the Brotherhood 



IN HISTORY 43 

of the Holy Sepulchre, against the Arab laity. The 
Greek clergy are clinging to the nationalist Greek 
character of the Jerusalem patriarchate with the same 
determination with which in the nineteenth century they 
tried to retain the Orthodox churches in Roumania and 
Bulgaria under the Greek nationalist and HeUenizing 
domination of the Patriarch of Constantinople. The 
strong nationalism of the Greek Orthodox patriarchate 
and its prelates has contributed greatly to the awakening 
and intensification of the national consciousness of the 
non-Greek laity. 

The Anglican church, which regards itself as a third 
oecumenical church alongside the Roman and the 
Orthodox churches, took repeated steps in the nineteenth 
century to effect a rapprochement and thereafter perhaps 
a re-union with the Orthodox church. What a contrast 
there is between the two churches ! One represents the 
spirit of modern dynamic civilization, the quest for 
social and practical reforms of Anglo-Saxondom and of 
the countries with highly developed industry ; the other, 
in its dignified torpidity, its contemplation, and its way 
of living, belongs entirely to the East with its primitive 
agricultural countries. For all that, this is not merely 
an attempt at expansion of the British Empire and of the 
Anglo-Saxon sphere of influence under cover of the stole, 
but a genuine part of the universalijzing effort, embracing 
East and West and all humanity, which to-day, amid all 
the conflicts and clashes of nationalisms and imperialisms, 
and in the midst of all concealments and distortions, is 
steadily growing. 

Since the world war the Church of England, with the 
Archbishop of Canterbury at its head, has repeatedly 
raised its voice on behalf of the Eastern churches, the 
Patriarchs of Moscow and Constantinople, the Armenians, 
and the Assyrians, At the Lambeth Conference of 1920 
delegates were present from the Patriarch of Constanti- 
nople (the city was then under British occupation), and in 
1923 the Patriarchs of Constantinople and Jerusalem 
and the Archbishop of Cyprus recognized the Anglican 



44 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

ordinations. This happened, it is true, to churches within 
the British sphere of influence, and the patriarchates of 
Constantinople and Jerusalem were then in a difficult 
political situation and in financial distress and were 
expecting aid from the Church of England. The Orthodox 
church of the East was also represented at the inter- 
national conference of the Protestant churches at 
Stockholm and Lausanne. But no progress was effected 
in the direction of the hoped-for union of the faiths. 

Rome, like the Anglican church, has interested itself 
in the churches of the East. In 1917 Benedict XV 
founded the Congregation of the Eastern church and the 
Papal Institute for Oriental Studies. In the Encyclical 
" Rerum Orientalium " of Septembex 8th, 1928, Pius XI 
laid stress on the importance of the restoration of unity, 
and further developed the Oriental Institute for this 
purpose. The motu proprio " Quod maxima " of 
September 30th, 1928, affiliated the Institute to the 
Papal University " in full confidence that this Institute 
wiU be of great service in attracting the Orientals as soon 
as possible into the centre of unity " (Rome). 

The churches of the Near East have been ** orphaned " 
since, with the fall of the Tsardom, the most powerful of 
the Orthodox churches has no longer been able to extend 
its protection to the others and to give them the benefit 
of frequent material aid, Rome and the Anglican church 
are in competition for the succession to this inheritance. 
The journey made by the Archbishop of Canterbury to 
Jerusalem in the spring of 1931 was jealously watched by 
the Vatican* But the churches of the Near East, apart 
from the Russian and the Balkan churches, are virtually 
of no significance as an element in power, comprising 
only a few million souls ; the revolutionizing of the eastern 
world and the contact with the West in recent decades 
have roused them, however, from their lethargy, and the 
modernization of the ethnic groups they represent faces 
them with new tasks. Their new responsibilities have 
strengthened their sense of a special trust. Under the 
entirely altered conditions of the new Orient these 



IN HISTORY 45 

churches, which, like Islam, have borne the cultural 
heritage of the last centuries of the ancient world right 
down to the threshold of the present times, have to go 
through a process of thorough transformation. To-day 
once more their destiny is bound up with that of the whole 
of the Near East and with that of Islam. 



ISLAM 

Islam entered in the Levant into the spiritual and 
political heritage of Hellenism and of the Eastern church. 
Its beginnings lay in Arabia, and here religious and 
national elements were closely associated. " At the time 
of his rise Mohammed was free from universalistic aims ; 
he was an Arabian prophet for the Arabians." (C. H. 
Becker.) As the preaching of Jesus was directed solely 
to the Jews, so the preaching of Mohammed, which in 
its content was also an eschatological preaching of 
repentance, with a highly-coloured description of the 
Day of Judgment, the pains of Hell, and the delights of 
Paradise, was directed to the Arabs. Islam brought a 
watchword uniting all the Arabs, and rousing them out of 
" ignorance " and tribal hatred to mighty deeds. The 
fact that Islam did not confine itself to Arabia was due, 
according to Leone Ca&tani, to economic causes : a 
continuous process of desiccation of the territory they 
inhabited drove the Bedouins into raids on the fertile 
land on their borders. To this day hunger is the principal 
cause of Bedouin raids ; changes in the natural environ- 
ment out of which they gain their subsistence result in 
mass migrations from the desert. A migration of this 
sort took place when the Arabs streamed out of the 
peninsula in the seventh century ; Islam had been the 
force that united them and the weakness of the Byzantine 
and Persian empires the circumstance that tempted 
them. The Mohammedan empire which then grew with 
such rapidity was originally a national Arab realm ; the 
Mohammedan Arabs formed the dominant class, and their 
subjects, who were left unhindered in the maintenance of 



46 MAN AND HIS ENVIKONMENT 

their faith, were the tillers of the soil, the artisans, the 
tax-payers. Islam only gradually developed into a 
universal religion; the subjugated peoples voluntarily 
went over to the new faith of the ruling class on social 
and economic grounds " an entirely peaceful and 
natural spread of the new religion." (C. H. Becker.) 
It is interesting to compare this with the spread of 
Christianity, a " slaves' religion," followed by the lowest 
strata of the people, which forced its way xipwards from 
below until it reached the head of the state : Islam, the 
religion of an aristocratic fighting caste, flowed down 
from above, beginning as the religion of the head of the 
state. In Islam there reigned a spirit of fraternal equality 
between all Mohammedans, a spirit adopted in the teach- 
ing but strange to the way of life of Christianity. Racial 
pride was unknown to Islam ; everyone who confessed 
Allah was accepted as a brother and an equal, whether 
he were a negro, a Malay, or a European ; the great 
attraction exercised by Islam in Africa to this day is 
largely due to this attitude. 

In many parts of the eastern Roman empire, especially 
in Syria and Egypt, the Arabs were welcomed by the 
population as liberators. It was possible for the Arabs 
to conquer Palestine and Syria so rapidly and without 
any determined resistance because the Byzantine rule 
was hated everywhere outside the Greek cities, of which 
Jerusalem, Caesarea, and Gaza were the most important. 
The burden of taxation under Emperor Heraclius weighed 
down the country, " On top of this economic burden 
there was the religious ; the ecclesiastical policy of 
Heraclius, the introduction of a Monotheletio formula, 
was pursued to the length of an inquisition against the 
Monophysites and the Jews, To this religious difference 
there was now joined the natural reaction of the Semitic 
element against Greek alien rule* In the Muslims, on 
the other hand, the many Christian Arabic clans, including 
the Aramaic ones, welcomed, to begin with, blood 
relations ; the tribute demanded by the Arabs was not 
heavy, and finally the Arabs granted full religious freedom 



IN HISTORY 47 

indeed, for political reasons, they actually favoured the 
unorthodox tendency. Thus, after the annihilation of 
its despotic masters, the country fell into the Arabs' 
hands without any effort on their part ; the opposition 
offered by Jerusalem and Caesarea is the exception that 
4 proves the rule, 5 for both cities were entirely Grecianized 
and Orthodox." (C. H. Becker.) Similarly the Mono- 
physite Copts of Egypt were glad to see the country 
wrested from the hands of the Greek-Orthodox Emperor 
by the Arabs. In Persia, where the Arabs were not 
welcomed as Semitic racial brethren or religious liberators, 
they met with greater resistance in their invasion ; and 
in Persia, unlike Syria, Palestine, and Egypt, the native 
language and the national traditions were preserved. 

Through the conversion of the conquered peoples to 
Islam the new great state soon lost its national character. 
The new Mohammedans brought their Hellenistic culture 
and the state-craft and science of the Byzantine and 
Persian empires, and under their influence the primitive 
Arabian Islam changed ; through Mohammed's relations 
with Judaism and Christianity it had been ready in advance 
for the full assimilation of the civilization of Hellenistic 
Asia Minor. Consequently Mohammedan civilization 
developed on the same bases as the medieval European 
civilization. This is true particularly of the Christian 
eastern Roman empire and the empire of the Khalifs, 
whose eastern frontiers coincided with the limits of the 
old spread of Hellenism. East Borne and Islam " were 
equals in the possession of a related but differently 
developed heritage, as bearers of the unbroken tradition 
of the last centuries of the ancient world ". (Robert 
Tschudi.) This similarity also embraces the medieval 
Christendom of western Europe. " The peculiar religious 
culture of the Middle Ages in Christendom and Islam is 
identical in its basic ideas ; the roots of both cultures and 
religions are intimately related, ... In the last 
resort both religions are rooted in the Orient and its 
world of ideas. In the period between the seventh and 
thirteenth centuries the politically strengthened world 



48 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

of the East was bound to be superior to the West, which 
had been politically and culturally broken by the 
invasions of the Teutons : in the East there was an 
organic connection between the ethnic forces and the 
intellectual ideals and conceptions, since here the thread 
of development had not been broken, . . . Hence 
the enormous cultural influence of the Islamic world on 
Christendom, which finds expression to this day in the 
numberless words of Arabic origin in our languages and 
of which it is impossible to have an exaggerated con- 
ception. Not only material products of the East but 
the broad lines of economic life, the ideal expressions 
of our medieval chivalry including even the poetry of 
the Minnesingers, for all its European appearance the 
bases of our whole education in the natural sciences, even 
ideas in philosophy and theology which have had a wide 
influence, came to us during that period from Islam. 
The consequences of the Crusades are the plainest 
evidence of the enormous superiority of the Islamic 
world, which we are recognizing more and more every 
day." (0. H. Becker.) 

So it is permissible to speak of a similarity, indeed an 
identity, of the cultural bases of the Near East and of the 
West in the Middle Ages* It was not only in the East 
that the contact between Islam and Christendom took 
place. The civilization founded in Sicily by the Arabian 
dynasty of the Kalbites made possible the country's 
progress under the Normans and under Frederick II. 
In the ninth century central Italy was under the dominion 
of the Sultan of Ban ; in 846 the Arabian fleets were at 
the gates of Rome, and in 878 Pope John VIII had to pay 
tribute to them. It was no superiority of the West but 
the disunity of the Arabs and the too-vast extent of their 
empire that made possible the riconquisia. 

The adoption of Hellenism changed the character of 
Islam as a state. It had originally been democratic and 
tolerant. This applies not only to the time of the first 
four Khalifa (the title Khalif means successor of 
Mohammed as commander of the Faithful), but also to 



IN HISTORY 49 

the time of the Omayyad Khalifs of Damascus. The 
change came when the Abbasids ruled Islam from 
Baghdad. The court of the Abbasids followed the pre- 
cedent of the court of the Great Bangs of Persia and the 
Emperor of Byzantium, and developed into a despotic 
oriental princely court with an elaborate ceremonial. 
The Omayyads in their desert fortresses had cultivated 
the old ideals of free Arab life ; the Abbasids, in contrast 
to the more temporal and secular leanings of the 
Omayyads, proposed " to regard their Khalifate as an 
ecclesiastical state, in whose government the sacred law 
was the only criterion. The Persian ideal of the intimate 
relationship between religion and government was plainly 
the programme of Abbasid rule." (Ignaz Goldziher.) 
This brought a change in the habitual toleration of 
Islam, a change due to the influence of the Christian 
ideas which it took over. Originally " the principle of 
toleration was put into operation in regard to the exercise 
of religion ; and the considerate and gentle treatment of 
persons of other faiths became the law of the land also 
in civil matters and in matters of trade. The oppression 
of the non-Muslims under Islamic protection was con- 
demned by the Faithful as a sinful excess. The governor 
of the province of Lebanon took stern proceedings at one 
time against the population, which had revolted against 
the oppressive measures of the tax-gatherers. He was 
reminded, by way of warning, of the teaching of the 
Prophet : " If any man shall oppress one who is assigned 
to his protection, and lays too heavy burdens on him, I 
shall myself stand forth as that man's accuser at the Day 
of Judgment." (Ignaz Goldziher.) Leone Caetani also 
points out this change in Islamic tolerance : " In the 
earliest times the Arabs were not fanatical but associated 
almost fraternally with their Christian Semitic cousins ; 
but these latter, after themselves quickly turning into 
Mussulmans, introduced into the new religion the 
intolerance, the blind hostility to the faith of Byzantium., 
with which they had previously brought destruction to 
the spirit of Oriental Christianity." 



50 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

For the Bedouins, conversion to Islam was mainly a 
superficial matter; only in Hellenized Islam did the 
canonical law, the Sharia, become the basis of the whole 
life of the community. As in medieval Jewry, whose 
Middle Age ended only a few decades before that of Islam, 
and in many cases continued to the threshold of the 
immediate present, religion, the obligation to God, domin- 
ated until recent times every act in daily life ; it was 
the ideal of the life of the community, the basis of the 
state, as well as the personal ideal of education and life. 
As the administration of the law required its inter- 
pretation and exposition, and this required an exact 
knowledge of the law, in Islam as in Jewry the caste of 
those proficient in the law, of the wise men learned in the 
word of God, enjoyed special esteem. Yet there was no 
priestly caste and no sacrament ; except for particular 
sects, Islam, like Jewry, held aloof from the Near Eastern 
cult of mysteries. 

Islam means submission to God, concentration on 
God. To Islam the absolute domination of the world by 
God is a basic dogma. Therefore the whole duty of man 
is to obey the will of the Creator. Many Sufis have 
clothed the basic dogma of Islam in magnificent phrases. 
The chief prayer of Ibrahim ibn Adham ran : " O God, 
bring me out of the contemptible condition of rebellion 
against Thee into the nobility of obedience." When the 
son of Elfadil died, this man, who at other times did not 
even smile, laughed and said : " If anything pleases God, 
it pleases me too." (Adalbert Merx.) Another Sufi 
spoke the word " Allah " without intermission until he 
went into ecstasy. At that a stone shattered his head, 
and the blood that spurted on to the ground formed as 
it flowed on the earth the letters of the name of God. 
(M. Horten.) This entire devotion to Allah explains the 
belief in fate (Turkish kismet) in Islam ; but the fate that 
comes to the Mohammedan and which he accepts in faith 
is no blind fate in the Greek sense, no senseless tragedy 
under the weight of which the hero is destroyed, but the 

of God, inscrutable by man, to which honour and 



IN HISTORY 51 

praise is due ; obedience to it ennobles and consummates 
the hero. That this fatalism can spur men on to overcome 
the fear of death and to commit courageous acts is 
evident, but it is equally evident that it may easily become 
a maxim of life injurious to culture and to activity and 
that it deters men from tenacious energy, from steady 
pursuit of a purpose in spite of obstacles and opposition. 
" For the rest, Islam has itself at times come out in 
opposition to the misuse of fatalistic ideas. Thus there 
is a tradition that there are three sorts of prayers to which 
God does not listen when anyone is living in a tumble- 
down house and prays to God to prevent it from falling 
in ; when he puts his goods and chattels out in the street 
and prays to God to protect them ; when he lets his beast 
run away and prays to God to catch it for him. 55 (Alfred 
Bertholet.) 

Islam has only one main division into sects which 
has continued down to the present time, influencing its 
political life in various fields. The four rites or schools 
of orthodox Islam do not amount to sects ; the differences 
between them are slight and do not touch essential 
questions either in dogma or in the law. The most con- 
servative of these schools, the Hanbalites, who reject all 
innovations and hold fast to the Sunna, the oral tradition 
from the time of the companions of the Ptophet, has the 
fewest supporters, but experienced a renascence in central 
Arabia with the Wahhabites in the eighteenth century. 
Twice, at the beginning of the nineteenth century and 
again in the twentieth, the followers of Mohammed ibn 
Abd-al-Wahhab have tried to restore the pure faith of the 
Sunna and a union of the Arabs in a single great realm ; 
like the Arabs under Mohammed himself, they were 
inspired at once by religious, national, and economic 
considerations. 

- The Shiite sect, the only dissenting sect known to 
Islam, had its origin in constitutional problems, not 
religious ones. The Shiites form the Shia (party) of Ali, 
Mohammed's son-in-law and the fourth Khalif ; they 
regard only Ali and his descendants as true Khalifs or 



52 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

Imams. All had two sons, grandsons of the Prophet, 
Hasan and Husain. Hasan's descendants bear to this 
day the title of sherif , those of Husain the title of sayyid. 
Husain died a martyr's death in battle against the 
Omayyads at Kerbela in Iraq, which has since been a 
pilgrims' resort for all the Shiites. The battle decided 
the question of the Khalifate, but in the eyes of the 
Shiites all the Khalifs were usurpers. The true Imams 
in their view were AH and his descendants, consecrated 
in their office in virtue of a dispensation of God, not of a 
human choice. According to the Shiite doctrine every 
generation and every epoch possesses its Imam, " who is 
alone entitled and enabled, by means of the extraordinary 
quality of infallibility bestowed on him by God, to instruct 
and to guide the community in all its religious affairs. 
The presence of an Imam is indispensable in every epoch, 
for without one of these inspired persons the aim of 
godly legislation and leadership would be unattainable," 
(Ignaz Goldziher.) Thus the Imam in the Shia becomes 
something quite different from the Sunmte Khalif. The 
Khalif becomes Mohammed's successor by human selec- 
tion, not through his inner qualities ; his task is the 
execution of the laws and the defence of Islam. He is not 
an authority on dogma, not a Pope ; he is the external 
symbol of the unity and continuity of Islam, which is a 
state and a religion at one and the same time. The 
Imam of the Shia, on the contrary, has superhuman 
qualities ; he is by birth a leader without sin and an 
infallible teacher of Islam. Some Shiite sects have 
brought the Imam into close association with the name of 
God. The Shia itself is divided into sects segregated 
according to the series of Imams whom they recognize. 
One group ends the series of Imams at the twelfth, 
another at the seventh. The last Imam is then regarded 
as the invisible lord of the age, living on in seclusion ; 
one day he will return as Imam Mahdi, the saviour of the 
world, and will set up the realm of peace and justice. 

In ordinary life Sunnites and Shiites differ little. The 
law and the dogma are binding on both and are the same 



IN HISTORY 53 

for both except for insignificant differences. The Shiite 
himself recognizes the principle of the Sunna, the oral 
tradition, but he bases his Sunna on the authority of All 
and his circle, notof the other " comrades "of the Prophet. 
Wellhausen and Goldziher have shown that the Shia did 
not arise under Persian influence. " The Alidic move- 
ment arose on native Arabic soil. The roots of the Imam 
theory, the theocratic opposition to the temporal con- 
ception of the power of the state, the Messianism into 
which the Imam theory runs, are to be attributed to 
Jewish and Christian influences. The Shiite form of 
opposition was, however, entirely welcome to the 
Persians." (Ignaz Goldziher.) In opposition to its 
neighbour, Turkey, the national Persian dynasty of the 
Saf awids raised the Shia in Persia to a state religion, and 
the conflicts between Turks and Persians, which formed 
a continuation of the old conflicts between eastern Rome 
and Persia, accentuated the religious difference. 

In addition to the Persian Shiites, who recognized 
the twelfth Imam as the last in the series, two other 
branches of the Shia have maintained their existence 
down to the present the Zeydites and the Ismailites. 
The former end the series of Imams at the fifth and 
recognize Zeyd as Imam. They stand nearest to the 
Sunnites. The Idrisides of north-west Africa, and to-day 
both the Imam of Yemen with his Zeydites and the 
Idrisidic Emir of Asir, go back to them. The Ismailites 
end the series of the visible Imams at the seventh, Ismail. 
They stand farthest from the Sunnites and have adopted 
into their system of belief a great deal of alien speculative 
matter, especially Neo-Platonic and Gnostic doctrines of 
emanation ; they have also given an allegorical significance 
to the Islamic traditions. The Ismailites are the most 
backward group in Islam, filled with a blind authoritarian 
belief in the power of the Imam and intolerant against 
other faiths. They live in India and in central Syria ; 
their head is the Indian Aga Khan, himself entirely 
Europeaniased he lives in London and on the Riviera, 
He is a man of extraordinary wealth and one of the most 



54 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

loyal supporters of British, policy in India and in the 
Near East. A peculiar, isolated Shiite sect, in which a 
good deal of old primitive paganism lives on, is that of the 
Nussayrians or Alauites, who live in the mountains along 
the coast of Syria between Tripoli and Alexandretta. 

For all the relationship between their bases and their 
ways of life, medieval Europe and Islam parted com- 
pletely when Europe broke with the Middle Ages through 
the influence of the humanists and the rationalists. The 
Europe that came into existence in the sixteenth century 
and was in full bloom in the eighteenth was inspired by a 
new sense of life which remained foreign to Islam and to 
the Eastern churches. In the past, East and West had 
been equals ; but from now onwards the West grew far 
beyond the East not only in power but in the breadth and 
depth of its intellectual life. The gulf between the two 
widened decade by decade, for while Europe advanced 
the East fell more and more deeply into lethargy and 
narrowness of spirit; it not only lost touch with the 
Western progress, but also with its own past, with the 
period when its own field of culture flourished and was 
at the height of its vitality. Only in recent years has 
Islam begun to awaken under the influence of Europe, 
to break away from the medievalism that has fettered it, 
to allow a field to critical thought, and to participate, 
even if, at present, only passively, in the cultural develop- 
ment of Europe since the days of Humanism. Religion 
is losing in the East, as it has lost in Europe, its universal 
influence over all life, it is beginning to be but a province 
of the life of the individual, new forces are bringing inspira- 
tion, reforming movements are setting in, and all this is 
taking place amid a serious crisis in every sphere of 
intellectual and social life. It does not mean the end of 
Islam, any more than the Renaissance and rationalism 
meant the end of Christianity in Europe. Islam will be 
able to adapt itself to the new field of work. " Islam, 
too, in, a crisis of the gravest, is emerging from medieval- 
ism ; but its religious and ethical forces will retain their 
vitality, even if the Sharia is no longer anything but an 



IN HISTORY 55 

ideal and there is no longer a Khalifate." (Robert 
Tschudi.) Thus there are grounds for hope that with 
time a new type of Mohammedan will arise, and that the 
relationship between East and West in bases and ways 
of life which was so pronounced in the Middle Ages will 
reappear. Then there will be an end of the four centuries 
of entire aloofness and segregation and a new approach 
will begin. Alfred Bertholet quotes a phrase of a present- 
day Mohammedan which contains much food for thought, 
and which the historian of this period will again and again 
feel to have in it at least an element of truth : " Men 
resemble their time more than they do their fathers." 

THE CRUSADES 

In the exercise of their rule over the Holy Places in 
Palestine, the Arabs showed a generous tolerance, in the 
spirit of the original Islam of Arabia, a tolerance of 
which there can scarcely be many other examples in the 
Middle Ages or even in modern times. The Khalif 
Haroun-al-Rashid appointed the IVanks to be protectors 
of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre: Charlemagne 
founded a hospital and a library in Jerusalem. Numbers 
of pilgrims from the West came to Jerusalem and were 
able to live there in peace and go their way entirely 
undisturbed. This lasted until about the end of the 
eleventh century. In 1021 eastern Rome took over the 
protectorate over the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, and 
the struggle over the Church between Rome and 
Byzantium which then began has lasted down to the 
present day, and has produced around the Holy Places 
an atmosphere of religious and political exasperation and 
jealous hostility which has brought conflicts and dis- 
turbances over and over again. The assumption of the 
protection of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre by the 
Byzantines also placed obstacles in the way of the pil- 
grimages from the West, which until then had taken 
place in peace. 

Toward the end of the eleventh century Palestine 



56 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

became the battlefield in which, as so often in history, the 
powers in Mesopotamia and in the Nile valley fought out 
their differences. The Turkish Seljuks, as hirelings and 
mayors of the palace of the more and more feeble Abbasid 
Khalifs of Baghdad, fought the Shiite Fatimids, who had 
founded an independent realm in Egypt. Syria and 
Assyria broke up into a number of semi-independent 
Seljuk governorships. This disunity between the 
Mohammedans, and the weakening of their power through 
division and through quarrels between the Seljuk generals, 
offered western Europe an opportunity of gaining a foot- 
ing in the Levant for the first time since the fall of the 
western Roman empire. The fighting between the 
Mohammedans had closed to European trade the great 
routes through the Levant, along which the world's 
commerce had passed under the earlier Abbasid Khalifs. 
At the end of the eleventh eejitury the West armed for 
its second great thrust against the Orient. The Crusades 
lasted three centuries and ended in complete failure. The 
Orient proved the stronger in the long run. But this 
period revolutionized the West and laid the foundation 
for its later rapid progress, while it left the countries of 
the East almost unaffected. So the Crusades, in spite 
of the victory of the Orient, became a source of the 
strength of Europe and started the decay of the East. 
At the bottom the Crusades were due to the religious 
excitement of the Middle Ages, the longing for repentance 
and for works pleasing to God. But the religious enthusi- 
asm was accompanied by many other motives and 
furthered them in turn* To begin with, at first a non- 
political and non-material motive, there was the vitality 
of chivalry, its urge to action, its thirst for adventure. 
The church had been exerting itself to keep within bounds 
the vengefulness and the brutal fighting spirit of the 
knighthood by means of the Truce of God and in other 
ways; now there was an opportunity of enabling the 
knights to wear out their passions on a pious and useful 
mission. " The knight who joined the Crusades might 
thus still indulge the bellicose side of his genius under 



IN HISTORY 57 

the aegis and at the bidding of the church ; and in doing 
so he would also attain what the spiritual side of his nature 
ardently sought a perfect salvation and remission of 
sins. He might butcher all day, till he waded ankle-deep 
in blood, and then at nightfall kneel, sobbing for joy, at 
the altar of the Sepulchre for was he not red from the 
winepress of the Lord ? One can readily understand the 
popularity of the Crusades, when one reflects that they 
permitted men to get to the other world by fighting hard 
on earth, and allowed them to gain the fruits of asceticism 
by the ways of hedonism." (Ernest Barker.) Manly 
courage and godly love, massacre and pilgrimage were 
bound up with one another. But the Crusades gained 
significance from three sets of political and economic 
motives the greed for booty on the part of knights 
and vassals, driven by years of famine and pestilence 
in north-western Europe to search for new countries and 
rich treasure, including new fiefs for the younger sons 
of the nobles ; the desire of the Pope to see Roman 
Christendom extend not only at the expense of Islam 
but also at that of the Eastern church, and so to attain 
the Catholic unity of the whole of the known world ; 
and the efforts of the rising Italian trading towns of 
Venice, Genoa, and Pisa, to re-open to trade the great 
routes which had been made unsafe by the unsettled 
state of the country through which they passed, to set 
up trading branches in the Levant ports, and to secure 
trading privileges of various kinds. 

The Crusades made Venice the leading power in the 
Levant. The city had become independent of Byzantium 
in the ninth century, and in 1048 it received such extensive 
privileges in Constantinople that it soon began to 
dominate the whole trade of the port, The fourth 
Crusade, which set up the empire of the Latins in 
Byzantium in 1204, was carried out under the leadership 
of Venice ; Venice gained from it privileges in the 
territory of eastern Rome and annexed Crete, the Greek 
islands, coastal territory in the Adriatic and the Black 
Sea, and Thessaly, The monopoly of trade in the 



58 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 
Adriatic, the Levant Sea, the Aegean, and the Black 
Sea made Venice the wealthiest city of the later Middle 
Ages and a great power. Not until the advance of the 
Ottoman Turks and the discovery of the route round 
Africa to India was an end made of the monopoly of trade 
with the East which the proud city of the Doges held 
throughout the centuries of the Crusades. 

While the Crusades brought the Italians the control of 
trade with the East, the political and cultural dominance 
fell to France. The Crusades began as a French and 
Norman enterprise ; the Crusaders were called Franks 
in the Near East, and the name is given to this day to 
the Christian Levantine population of the trading cities ; 
and the states founded in the Levant by the Crusaders 
bore in every respect a French character, France has 
kept alive her spiritual and political claim to the Levant 
since the Crusades ; in taking possession of Syria in 1919 
France entered into the heritage of Godfrey of Bouillon 
and Saint Louis ; in addition she laid hands on Damascus, 
Horns, Hama, and Aleppo, which had never been in the 
possession of the Crusaders. But " historic " claims have 
a way of not only lasting but growing as they last. 

Jerusalem fell into the hands of the Crusaders on 
July 15th, 1099. Its kingdom extended eastwards to 
the Jordan ; east of the Dead Sea it also included a small 
strip of territory with Kerak. It reached southwards 
as fax as Akaba, the port at the north-east point of the 
Red Sea. Akaba was an important point for the 
Crusaders; the goods of southern Arabia and India 
came there through the Bed Sea and could be forwarded 
thence to the Phoenician coast. But the centre of 
gravity of the kingdom of Jerusalem did not lie in 
Jerusalem or in Judaea or in the mountains, where the 
Israelites and the Jews had once lived, but in the coastal 
plain, which had once belonged to Phoenicians and 
Philistines. It is interesting to note that Zionist 
colonization, which took up the historic claim of the Jews 
of ancient times, followed the Crusaders* policy; the 
mountain country, which had originally been the home 



IN HISTORY 59 

of the Jews, remained as in the time of the Crusaders 
in the hands of the indigenous inhabitants ; the colonists 
coming from the West concentrated on the fertile coastal 
plains and their trading cities. 

Alongside the kingdom of Jerusalem the Crusaders 
founded three other states, the principality of Antioch 
and the countships of Edessa and Tripoli. They thus 
controlled the whole coastland from Egypt to the Gulf of 
Alexandretta, leaving the interior of the country to the 
Mohammedans. Here again the latest developments 
have followed precedent : after the world war the British 
and the French sought to establish their domination of 
the Levant and its trade routes by bringing the coastal 
strip from Egypt to Alexandretta under their direct 
control, separating it to this end from its hinterland and 
splitting it up into various small states in which they 
assured their domination by favouring the minorities 
the Jews in Palestine, the Maronites in Lebanon, the 
Alauites in the Government of Latakia, and the Turks in 
the Sandjak of Alexandretta. The Mohammedans were 
left only the territory that had reverted to desert. This 
territory lost its importance in being cut off from the 
coastal strip ; that strip, open to the world, was of critical 
political and commercial importance. 

In this coastal strip the Western traders then, in the 
time of the Crusades, as now, set up their factories and 
commercial houses, protected by special privileges. At 
that period Venice and Genoa were granted important 
privileges by the Crusaders, special areas in the Near 
East cities, freedom from all taxation, and their own 
courts of justice. These privileges, first granted in such 
towns as Tyre and Acre, as well as Constantinople, were 
the origin of the system of capitulations which made the 
European business communities in the Near East a state 
within the state and withdrew them from the financial 
and juridical sovereignty of the territorial state in which 
they had settled. The states that have won their 
independence, Turkey, Iran, Iraq, have now abolished 
capitulations, but in Egypt they still remain in full force, 



60 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

and in Palestine and Syria the Mandatory Powers still 
retain them on a restricted scale. 

With the setting up of the kingdom of Jerusalem the 
Crusaders reached the summit of their success. The 
second Crusade, under two Western kings, Louis VII of 
France and Conrad of Germany, collapsed under the 
victories of the Mohammedans,, who now took the offen- 
sive ; Saladin had meanwhile re-imited Syria and Egypt, 
The Crusaders were unable to withstand the united 
Mohammedans, and Jerusalem was attacked by the armies 
of Saladin. It is a Holy City to the Mohammedans as 
well as the Christians ; its Arabic name of Kuds al Sherif 
is derived from the sacredness of the city, and its recapture 
was greeted with the same enthusiasm which had filled 
the Crusading armies ninety years earlier. The city fell 
into the hands of the Mohammedans on October 2nd, 
1287. All the efforts of united Europe to recapture it 
by force of arms failed. 

Among the peoples of Christendom " national 
jealousies had been increased and national differences 
brought into prominence by association in a common 
enterprise, while on the other side Christians and 
Mohammedans associated as brethren in a way they had 
never done before ". (Ernest Barker*) In Europe in 
the twelfth century the Crusades had begun as a bond of 
religious and Christian union between the peoples ; but 
as they proceeded they developed into an important 
factor in the awakening of the nationalism of the Western 
peoples and so in the destruction of Christian unity. On 
the other hand they proved to the Europeans that the 
Orientals were not only their equals in culture and 
capacity but in many respects their superiors. 

Leasing, in his Nathan der Weise, had good reason 
for making Saladin an example of noble tolerance* Saladin 
was of the fine flower of Arab knightliness. Arab Chivalry 
did not become, like the Chivalry of the West, an organiza- 
tion ; it remained, as before Islam, a principle and a 
way of life; but it had a manifold influence on Western 
Chivalry. Magnanimity and courage, the sense of honour, 



IN HISTORY 61 

the respect for womanhood, the art of poetry and the love 
of the chase were regarded as knightly virtues. The 
common aspiration to knightliness and the mutual trading 
relations brought Franks and Mohammedans close to 
one another. Most of the Crusaders married eastern 
women, and their princes Greek and Armenian princesses. 
They adopted the higher and more refined standard of the 
Orientals in clothing, way of living, and education. Only 
through a negotiated treaty and for the very limited dura- 
tion of the treaty was the Hohenstaufen Emperor 
Frederick II (who under the influence of Arab civilization 
had become one of the most notable princes of the Middle 
Ages) able to bring Jerusalem and the coastal cities back 
into Christian ownership, from 1229 to 1244. Not until 
673 years later was a Christian Crusader, General Allenby, 
once more to capture Jerusalem. This time, too, ideals 
were united with aims of economic and political expansion 
as motives of the enterprise. 

In 1291, after further vain Crusades, the last fortress 
of the Crusaders, Acre, fell into the hands of the 
Mohammedans. The Bay of Haifa was Europe's last 
possession in the Holy Land. The Venetians hastened 
to conclude advantageous treaties of amity with the 
foes of Christendom and to secure for themselves the same 
trading privileges that they had possessed under the 
Crusaders. Only in Cyprus, the commanding outpost 
in the Levant Sea, did the Crusaders retain their hold 
until 1489 ; its capital, Famagusta, was an important 
trading centre. With the death of the last king of the 
island Venice came into possession of it through adopting 
the king's widow, a Venetian woman, as a daughter of 
the republic. For eighty-two years Venice ruled over 
Cyprus, whose inhabitants had even more reason to com- 
plain of its harsh rule than of that of the titular kings of 
Jerusalem . Then the island shared the fate of Jerusalem : 
it fell into the hands of the Turks, and came later under 
British rule* 

The Crusades continued for nearly 200 years after 
the fall of Acre, But their character had changed : they 



62 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

were no longer an offensive against the Holy Land, but a 
defensive struggle against the Turks, who carried the 
banners of Islam as far as Hungary. The Levant 
remained in Eastern hands. But the Crusades had 
greatly widened the vision of the Europeans. About this 
period European missionaries and traders had reached 
China, India, and central Asia ; the Levant routes were 
more thoroughly explored and the wealth of the Far East 
became more familiar. The journey was made overland 
from Acre to Peking, and by sea from Basra to Canton. 
New horizons opened, the frontiers were pushed farther 
back, and a new vision of life arose- The medieval 
lethargy and isolation of Europe had been broken down. 
The spirit of the Crusades took Vasco da Gama round the 
Cape of Good Hope. The Levant had been able to beat 
off the invaders, but the ultimate result of the Crusades 
was the thrusting out of the Levant from the centre of 
history. Trade and civilization took other paths. But 
before this happened the end of a great historic period 
was to be, as it were, compressed into one symbolic act : 
on May 30th, 1463, the Turks entered Constantinople, 
which they regarded as the capital of Christendom, the 
urba of the expiring ancient world, the pclia of Hellenism* 
From their long struggle to enter this city eia ten polin 
it received its Turkish name of Istanbul. The capital 
of the Christian Roman Emperors became the seat of the 
Khalif , the Hagia Sophia a mosque* 

THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE 

When Constantinople fell, the great civilizing power of 
Islam was already broken. As the ancient civilization of 
Europe foundered amid the mass migration of peoples, 
and several centuries passed before civilized life began 
anew in Europe, so the civilization of Islam and the 
beginnings of an eastern European, Slav civilization 
perished amid the great mass migration which brought 
the Mongols under Genghis Khan westward from the 
interior of Asia. That great conqueror left behind him 



IN HISTORY 63 

an empire that stretched from the China Sea to the 
Dnieper. In 1258 Baghdad fell before his successor, and 
the Abbasid Khalifate and the power of the Seljuks, 
who had founded a state in Asia Minor with Konia as its 
capital, came to an end. The Mongols had a number of 
Turkish tribes in their ranks, and drove others before 
them. 

At the time when Baghdad fell before the Mongols, 
the Osmans, one of the Turkish knightly fraternities 
settled by the Seljuks on territory in the north-west of 
Asia Minor, rose to power. The early history of this 
fraternity is lost in legendary obscurity. Its leader 
Osman, son of Ertoghrul, conquered Brussa in the year of 
his death, 1326. From then on the Osmanli advanced 
rapidly and unceasingly through two centuries to world 
power. By 1361 Murad I had conquered Adrianople and 
reduced the Balkan countries to submission ; Constanti- 
nople had long lost all real power and independence before 
it fell in 1453. The Ottoman empire reached its zenith 
under Suleiman I (1520-1566), who conquered Budapest 
and Algiers ; his victorious fleets dominated the 
Mediterranean, and his possessions included the shores 
of the Black Sea and the Persian Gulf. But with the 
expansion of the empire the first signs of decay made their 
appearance. Suleiman, "the great lawgiver, was still able 
to cope with the difficulties. Through peace and security 
in the wide realm, through the admirable administration, 
the excellent state of the finances, and the strong army, 
always ready to strike, the Ottoman empire was one of 
the most powerful and most prosperous of states. The 
old method of bringing in assimilated renegades to rein- 
force the upper ranks gave an incomparable field of ser- 
vice in the world empire to the best heads among the 
subjected population/' In those days the Ottoman 
empire saved from the heritage of the civilizations that 
had sprung from the latest period of the ancient world 
so much as had escaped in the destruction of the Khalifate 
by the Mongol incursion and the destruction of Byzantium 
by the Latins. c< These were, it is true, old, tired 



64 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

civilizations ; they were granted a second flowering^ 
and the syncretistic technique this demanded made the 
Ottoman state not only an artistic but an artificial 
product, too Oriental for the West, too Byzantine for 
the East." (Robert Tschudi.) 

With Suleiman there came to an end the succession of 
great and powerful sultans. The external magnificence 
and the wide extent of the empire continued unchallenged 
for a further century and a half. But within it there was 
being repeated the experience of all the autocracies of the 
Orient: feeble rulers, with their harems and their 
favourites, ruined finances, disordered administration, 
everywhere corruption and the absence of all sense of 
responsibility for the state as a whole. The turning 
point in the empire's external relations came with the 
peace treaty of Carlowitz in 1699. At the same time 
there began the long continued conflict with Russia, 
whose Tsar demanded from the Sultan, for a long time j 
without success, the recognition of his title of Emperor 
and his equality of standing. The peace treaty of Kutchuk 
Kainardji (1774) brought Russia the right of surveillance 
of the Danube principalities which were under Turkish 
sovereignty, and the opportunity of claiming under a 
clause of the treaty a protectorate over the Orthodox 
Christians in the Ottoman empire. 

After this the dissolution of the once mighty empire 
was only a question of time, It was delayed by the 
jealousy of the European Powers, which kept the " sick 
man " alive. There were many points of friction ; the 
interests of Russian and Austro-Hungarian expansion 
came into conflict in the Balkans, and the control of the 
Bosphorus was regarded alike by Great Britain and by 
Russia as a matter of vital importance. Asiatic Turkey, 
which until well into the nineteenth century had been 
regarded as outside the sphere of interest of the European 
Powers, began to attract their attention, each of them 
watching to see that none of the others extended its field 
of influence. Out of this conflict of interests there arose 
the programme of the maintenance of the integrity of 



IN HISTORY 65 

Turkey, at all events until the Powers could agree between 
themselves over the detachment of one or other of the 
provinces of the empire, or until one of them should take 
the risk of facing the rest with an accomplished fact. 

As early as 1815, at the Vienna Congress, the Powers 
were planning a guarantee of the territorial integrity of 
Turkey, and at the Congress of Paris in 1856 all the sig- 
natories bound themselves to respect her independence 
and territorial integrity. At that time Turkey had made 
a beginning with her first attempts at reform, to turn a 
medieval oriental state into a modern state, all the 
inhabitants of which should enjoy equal rights and accept 
equal obligations. But the Powers had an interest in 
maintaining Turkey in her old weakness and disunion. 
Within the Ottoman empire there was no dominant class 
to carry out the reforms from patriotic zeal and to awaken 
a new sense of the state. The placing of the Christian 
population on an equality with the Mohammedan did not 
have the desired success ; many Mohammedans looked 
down with contempt on the unbelievers who had suffered 
centuries of oppression, while the Christian nationalities 
concentrated their whole attention on the acquisition of 
independence, and to that end on the weakening of Turkey 
with the aid of the foreign Christian Powers. The struggle 
between Eussia and the Western Powers, especially 
France, for dominance in Turkey, went on under the cover 
of a struggle between the Orthodox and Catholic churches 
for controlling influence in the Holy Places. It was a 
struggle of this sort over the rights of the monks at the 
Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem that led to the 
Crimean War* 

On its eastern frontier the Ottoman empire continued 
the old struggle of eastern Rome against Persia. Persia 
had not had, like Turkey, a period, at the beginning of the 
modern age, of great advance in political power, but on 
the other hand Persian culture had spread through 
Turkestan and, under the rule of the Grand Moguls, 
Mohammedan India, where Persian became the language 
of official and educated intercourse. But the struggles 



66 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

between Persia and Turkey were without significance * 
the fate of Persia (which had been ruled since the end o! 
the eighteenth century by the dynasty of the KajarsJ 
depended, like that of Turkey, on the issue of the rivalry 
between Great Britain and Russia. As in Turkey, the 
policy of the granting of loans to the government was 
pursued with a view to securing political and economic 
concessions for the European states and continually 
weakening and exploiting the country. u It is manifest 
that the brutally selfish policy of the Europeans, together 
with the incapacity and unscrupulousness of the govern- 
ment, was bound to result in the economic and social ruin 
of the country. And the people were still too weak to 
take their fate into their own hands." (Hans Heinrich 
Schader,) When, however, the people took cotirage to 
do this, when the Persian revolution, the first in the coun- 
tries of the Orient, gave the signal for political and 
economic emancipation, the Powers exerted themselves 
to the utmost to make impossible any reform and any 
improvement in the condition of the people. The history 
of this period, which is only typical of what was going on 
all over the East, has been written by an American, 
Morgan Shuster, from a knowledge of the circumstances 
gained in Persia itself in the course of intimate collabora- 
tion with the Persians. He gave his book the significant 
title of The Strangling of Persia. 

It was only at the beginning of the twentieth century 
that Persia came into contact with European ideas and 
so was led to set her house in order. In Turkey there had 
already been contact with Europe for half a century. 
Turkish writers had conveyed the ideas of the Western 
world in the Turkish language to their compatriots. There 
had been an uninterrupted process of modernization 
among the Turkish intelligentsia, though it only affected 
a small upper stratum of the people* The social and 
cultural attitude to life of medieval Islam was replaced 
by the ideas of the West, the rights of man and of the 
citizen, the freedom and dignity of the nation, the ration- 
alist and scientific attitude to life. For three decades 



IN HISTORY 67 

Sultan Abdul Hamid attempted through his reactionary 
and tyrannical regime to check the progress of modern 
ideas, of Liberalism and nationalism, in his empire. He 
made use for this purpose of the religious fanaticism of the 
uneducated masses of the people. Abdul Hamid became 
the great champion of Pan-Islamism. He made much of 
his position as Khalif , and used it to gain the adhesion of 
Mohammedans outside Turkey. But his resistance to the 
penetration of Western ideas proved as hopelessly 
ineffectual as the similar efforts of the Austria of 
Metternich and those of Tsarist Russia had been. The 
assimilation of the technical progress of the West, at least 
by a small class of intellectuals, was absolutely necessary 
to enable an army and an administration to be developed, 
and it was impossible to permit this without also admitting 
the ideas which formed the basis of all technical achieve- 
ment. It was this upper stratum that carried through the 
revolution of 1908, with the watchword " Unity and 
Progress ". They were led by officers and by intellectuals 
who had returned from exile. The nationalism they 
brought with them from Europe was bound to hasten the 
dissolution of this empire of many nationalities. 

During the last two centuries of its history the 
Ottoman empire has been the arena of the new contest 
between East and West. But this resumption of the old 
rivalry of the time of the Crusades took place under 
totally changed circumstances. The political and cultural 
superiority of the West was firmly established ; in no 
field of social or intellectual life had the East anything of 
comparable value to oppose to it. Thus it was possible 
for the West to penetrate the East politically and cul- 
turally without meeting with any lasting resistance. 
The political pressure has grown in recent decades with the 
opening of the international trade routes by water, on the 
land, and in the air, and with the continually increasing 
closeness of the network of world trade. The Levant 
became a field of tension in world politics, in which the 
oriental peoples were merely passive elements with which 
world policy operated. Only in recent years, with the 
change in the view of the world formed by the people 



68 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

of the Orient under the influence of European thought, 
has there begun a complete transformation in the political, 
social, and cultural life of the East which, under the 
stimulating influence of the West, has awakened to new 
activity in political and economic life. 

The relations between East and West have entered 
upon a new phase. The world war, in which all the 
countries of the Near East were involved, was the turning 
point. At the end of the world war the West succeeded 
in doing what it had already done once at the time of the 
Crusades. Constantinople was occupied by the Allied 
Powers, under British leadership. European influence 
in the Near East attained its zenith. Turkey, Persia, the 
countries of Arabia, and Egypt seemed to have fallen 
once and for all under the political and economic domina- 
tion of the West. But this apparently supreme point 
attained by the power of the West was actually the turn- 
ing point. The fate of Constantinople seems like a 
symbolic summing up of the significance of this transition 
period. In the Middle Ages the Pope, the Latins, 
Normans, Italians, had invested the city in vain ; the 
Tsar of Russia, the King of the Hellenes, the Tsar of the 
Bulgars made efforts in the past century to obtain pos- 
session of the city in order to fulfil the aspirations of their 
peoples. Here West and East had fought for domination 
of the world, for their souls, for their faiths. This city 
was witness of a historic continuity which reached from 
Hellenism down to the twentieth century. Down to our 
own day it bore the name of the founder of its greatness. 
Only now has it lost its world significance ; and now it 
has only its Turkish name left Istanbul. The Turks 
themselves have transferred their capital to Asia, to the 
interior of Anatolia, whence they once issued for the 
conquest of the West. With the victory of European 
ideas in the Near East the centuries of rivalry of which 
Constantinople was the symbol seem to have ended. 
On the rejuvenated bases of a historic past, which was 
determined by the attraction and rejection, the penetra- 
tion and separation of West and East, the present is 
building farther, 



MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT AT THE 
PRESENT DAY 

WITH the uniformity of his climate and natural conditions, 
and the uniformity of his history, in the course of which 
there were continual interminglings of races, all of them 
exposed to the working of the same civilizing forces, there 
is a corresponding uniformity of type of Levantine man 
in spite of all differentiations. His character has been 
determined by two different elements: the inborn 
qualities of the man of the Mediterranean and the man of 
the Near East, and the typical way of life of the man of 
the pre-capitalistic economic epoch. The Mediterranean 
man and the man of the Near East still live in some 
degree in the pre-capitalistic world ; they are only at the 
threshold of industrial capitalism. The changing economic 
conditions will affect the character of these men, will 
change some of their distinguishing features, and will 
train them in a new general outlook. For human 
characteristics are not determined only by race and 
environment but also by history and social development. 
The process of economic restratification will result in 
changes similar to those which took place in Europe some 
centuries ago in men's way of living, in their general 
attitude and in their outlook on the world, and which in 
recent years, with the bringing of the whole planet into a 
uniform and world-wide machine economy, has taken 
place alike in Russia and in the Far East, in South America 
and India. 

The climate of the Mediterranean countries determines 
the external features of life. In the north the closed 
house is the centre of life not only of family life, but also 
of social, cultural, and economic relations. Men leave 
their houses only for the special reasons which bring 
them into the street or the open air. It is different in the 

69 



70 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

Mediterranean region. There the centre of personal and 
social life is the open place, the Forum or the Agora, the 
caf 6s with their seats on the pavement, the open shops and 
booths. The reliability and mildness of the weather per- 
mit the great open-air theatres. This life in the open 
air brings more intimate comradeship than does the seclu- 
sion of the northern houses. Speech flows more easily, 
men are not so cut off from one another, they meet every- 
where, and this intermingling produces a natural, 
unconstrained, hearty democracy ; intercourse is not so 
stiff, men are more impulsive, voices are louder. Only 
the Mohammedan preserves at times the silent dignity 
of the desert. 

But this public life is only for the men ; the women are 
tied to the house, not only among the Mohammedans, 
although with special strictness among them. Women 
do not enter the caf6s or places of entertainment, and 
men's and women's gatherings are usually strictly 
segregated. In the home the position of the woman 
varies ; often she is the servant of the man, often she 
ranks as mistress of the house. Her seclusion frequently 
results in ignorance, in a blas<S shallowness and super- 
ficiality, in mere sweet-eating and idling. Yet there are 
many exceptions. The woman of the lower classes is 
very hard-working, her frame steeled by the rigours of 
exacting labour, but often prematurely aged. The 
mother is everywhere in a position of authority among 
her children ; she is the most respected member of the 
home ; the grandmother also is treated with great respect. 
The isolation of family life has prevented any relaxation 
of morals. 

The climate reduces the need for clothing and shelter, 
The man of the Near East is temperate in eating and 
drinking. The Mohammedan is forbidden wine, but 
among the Christians also drunkenness is rare, Since 
needs are less, especiaUy in view of the different attitude 
to industry, less labour seems necessary than in the 
European capitalist countries. The man of the Mediter- 
ranean has more free time, more sense of the simple 



AT THE PRESENT DAY 71 

joys of life, of the dolce far niente. Business deals are 
concluded in the open air, in cafes, always amid easy- 
going negotiation, without any undignified haste, without 
any sense of time or of the value of time. 

This " timelessness " is a part of the pre-capitalist 
attitude towards trade and industry. Life still proceeds 
amid a natural harmony, in which there is as yet no 
dominance of the impulse to push business at the cost of 
everybody else, of the lust for the acquisition of material 
possessions. Men still have a dignified indifference to the 
chances of business success ; they feel it as important to 
satisfy the need for an easy-going and care-free existence 
and for a simple and direct joy in life as to earn money. 
Poverty is no disgrace, and in business life irrational 
considerations play an important part. In the suk 
(bazaar) one may often find vendors who make themselves 
a nuisance in their efforts to attract customers and who 
sing the praises of their goods with Oriental extravagance; 
but this is more from southern exuberance and the joy 
in simply making a noise, especially among the typical 
trading peoples of the Levant ; most of the shopkeepers 
sit silently amid the treasures of their open shops, waiting 
patiently for customers to come ; if the customer enters 
they allow him to explore their stock in silence, and 
scarcely betray by a movement any interest in doing 
business, The typical Levantine trading is not carried 
on out of trading zeal or self-seeking. 

There is not the same care as in the north to keep to 
the exact truth ; people promise more than they mean 
to do ; but those who are dealing with them are aware 
of the rhetorical exaggerations and know exactly how 
much or how little of all the talk and big figures need be 
taken seriously* In all this there is less of peasant 
cunning and graspingness than in northern Europe. It 
is a "naive joy in bargaining, not for the sake of making 
money but just for the joy of beating the opponent in 
the trading game, a deal which is nothing else than a 
competition between man and man. Such business has 
nothing whatever to do with honesty and dishonesty; 



72 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

everything is permitted that can be devised by human 
ingenuity." (Reinhard Junge.) 

The Mediterranean workman also works industriously, 
but only as much as he has to, and if he has saved up a 
little he will live on it until it is exhausted and he must 
go to work again. He works with a will only when his 
work has in it a creative element or satisfies his pleasure 
in form and colour, and his patience is soon exhausted by 
monotonous and undistinguished work such as is offered 
by modern machine production. The lack of a sense of 
time is characteristic of the whole life of the easterner : 
in the languages of the peoples at this stage in social 
evolution, in Arabic, Russian, Spanish, the word for 
"to-morrow" has a vague and indefinite significance, 
amounting in effect to " by and by ". Time is not money, 
and money itself is held of much less account than in 
Europe or North America. The easterner who states 
a time never means it with any precision. Similarly, in 
common with all men of the pre-capitalist era, he is 
without a sense of precision and proportion in other 
ways, in industrial processes, for instance, which call for 
minute attention in correlating the play of various operat- 
ing parts, or for the last millimetre of accuracy in 
finishing. His spirit rebels against any excessive rational- 
ization of life and work. 

In his business life, too, an important part is played 
by fancy, by sympathies and antipathies. At one moment 
he will be tempted by alluring castles in the air, at 
another he will fall into the resignation of fatalism. He 
is not hard enough with himself, is easily led by his 
inclinations, and will interrupt the work on which he is 
engaged on the slightest occasion. Moreover, the 
townsman, especially the trader of the type described 
as Levantine or, like the traders of Turkestan, as a Sarte, 
belongs to a class that has been oppressed for centuries ; 
he is driven by the desire for respectful recognition to an 
exhibition of vanity and an attempt to exaggerate his 
importance, both of which interfere with his business 
efficiency. 



AT THE PRESENT DAY 73 

The same irresponsibility is found among the peasants, 
who after many months of living on the edge of hunger will 
suddenly, on some festal occasion such as a betrothal, 
spend in a single day more than they normally spend in 
a whole year, so incurring an enormous burden of debt. 
Hospitality is lavish everywhere, frequently to the 
extent of injuring the host's financial position ; for a 
chance guest the easterner will rush into expenditure 
out of all proportion to his normal meagre existence. 
Among the well-to-do classes in the towns this desire 
to make a good show has results which are even more 
injurious socially and economically, when the penetration 
of European civilization brings the opportunity for a 
manner of life which also undermines the traditional 
bases of stern morality and patriarchalism. 

The population is divided into three groups, differing 
in their economic activities and in their characteristics 
the nomads, the peasants, and the townspeople. The 
nomads include the Arabs of steppe and desert, the 
Bedouins, and numbers of Turkish and Kurdish tribes. 
They are all characterized by a proud demeanour and 
an impatience of anything that interferes with their 
independence. They have not the desire for recognition 
or the ambition to cut a figure with which the townsman 
and some of the peasants are filled. Their cultural 
level is very low ; they do not display the desire for educa- 
tion or the intellectual activity and receptivity that 
distinguish the townspeople. The Bedouins are herds- 
men, but often live in walled towns in the oases, where 
they cultivate grain ; the date palm, however, provides 
the main food supply. As they dominate the caravan 
routes, they draw profit from trade, either as dealers or as 
guardians of the highways exacting levies from the 
caravans. The important route from the south of Arabia 
along the Red Sea to the Mediterranean was the seat of 
numbers of tribes who lived in this way on trade, some 
of them directly, some parasitically. The nomad herds- 
men, on the other hand, in the steppes and deserts of 
Arabia, Asia Minor, or Iran lead a very meagre and 



74 MAN AND HIS ENVIEONMENT 

primitive existence. Most of them are driven by hunger 
to raid the cultivated land or the other nomad tribes 
on its border. 

If ever, thanks to the rare combination of an excep- 
tional gift of organization with public spirit in the 
government or among the leaders, the opportunity comes 
for them to settle and take up agriculture, they gladly 
seize it. King Ibn Saud, the leader of the Wahhabites, 
has settled many of the restless Bedouin tribes of central 
Arabia around springs in the desert in the present century. 
In this way he has not only given these tribes increased 
economic security, but has also given his empire some 
prospect of permanence. For the nomad is politically 
unstable and rebellious. Under the leadership of a great 
statesman and soldier he can found an empire, but this 
empire soon falls into dissolution. The life of the nomad 
knows nothing of the steady continuity of an organic 
system of government. 

Among the various tribes the loose forms of govern- 
ment are entirely democratic. The community as a 
whole determine matters of common concern, and only 
for the duration of a campaign or a raid do they accept 
submission to a chosen leader or to one who stands out 
through his bravery and qualities of character. Their 
rejection of authority prevents the misuse of authority 
general in urban and peasant communities* 

Thus the nomads form no permanent states either 
in the steppes or in the mountains. The principal 
representatives of the mountain nomads of the Levant 
are the Kurds. In winter they live in strongly built 
villages on the lower slopes of the mountains, and grow 
grain around them ; in the summer they take their herds 
to pasture high up in the mountains* They too are 
proud, independent, and often ferooions as fighters and 
raiders. The Kurds, and also the Druses of Lebanon 
and the Druse mountains, have developed, unlike the 
nomads of the steppes, a tribal organization under 
the rule of hereditary feudal families, to whom they give 
allegiance* 



AT THE PRESENT DAY 75 

The Turks also were originally nomads, and the aristo- 
cratic stratum among the Turks has retained something 
of the lordliness of the nomad chiefs. The Turkish 
peasant has become a peasant of the normal type. The 
Turkish townsmen, on the other hand, have remained 
until recently a ruling class alien to urban economic 
life, a caste of soldiers and officials, proud and full of the 
sense of their own dignity, but without application, 
without any ambition for education, and without any 
gift for trade and industry, which have fallen entirely 
into the hands of the Christian peoples of the Levant, 
especially the Greeks and Armenians, on whom the Turk 
looks down with contempt. This character of the 
Turkish ruling class, inherited from its nomad days, 
accounted for the fact that the vast empire so rapidly 
formed by the ruling race, at the time when its powers 
were still unexhausted, lingered in impotence for a 
time before it entirely fell to pieces, and did not contain 
within itself the guarantee of an efficient order that could 
establish permanence. 

The peasants or fellaheen are hard workers, cautious 
and suspicious, but with great natural intelligence. They 
carry on a hard struggle against the unfruitf ulness of the 
soil and the shortage of water, or against its exuberance 
in the deltas, but are underfed and uneducated, suffering 
from centuries of oppression and exploitation. His 
prudence and caution makes the fellah "in his daily 
labours an extremely patient worker, able to carry out 
with great industry the most tedious and monotonous 
tasks in petty cultivation ; his mentality often makes 
him an unexcelled master of such work. A further con- 
sequence of cautiousness is often great obstinacy in holding 
on to old economic forms with the utmost tenacity, and 
in meeting the foreigner, if he tries to introduce new 
methods with all too little consideration of the human 
element, with insuperable suspicion. Lack of under- 
standing becomes refusal to understand. Only the 
deepest consideration for the people, the deepest love 
for the people, touching the heart of the Oriental, can 



76 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

conquer this difficulty " and pave the way for more 
modern methods. (Reinhard Junge.) 

The peasant's wife is as industrious as the peasant 
himself. Even among the Mohammedans the country- 
woman is not subjected in any way to the seclusion 
suffered by the townswoman, especially among the upper 
classes. 

Until recent times the peasant, as in eastern Europe 
and a hundred years ago in central Europe, counted 
politically for nothing at all ; to the governments he was 
simply a source of revenue and to the usurers a subject 
of exploitation. But the new national movements have 
given him a hitherto unknown self -confidence and have 
directed the attention of national governments to the 
peasantry as pillars of the strength and future of the 
nation. On the other hand, the quickened flow of money 
and exchange, the complications of world trade, and the 
contact with new and superior forms of economic 
organization, at first far beyond his comprehension, have, 
if anything, made worse his century-old impoverishment. 
The burden of taxation in all these countries was borne 
mainly by the peasants and was made still more 
unendurable by the farming of the taxes, greatly increas- 
ing a burden already excessive* The lack of any organized 
system of credit prevented any transition to more inten- 
sive farming, even had the peasant had the needed 
education, and drove the peasantry into the hands of 
moneylenders who demanded rates of interest often 
amounting to 50 per cent, per annum and even exceed- 
ing this ; the ignorant and unprotected countryman 
was quite unable to repay his loan on top of the interest, 
and fell deeper and deeper into debt. 

Large ownership does exist in the Near East, and 
also large ownership in mortmain, which is known as 
waqf, " pious foundation " But there is very little of 
large-scale farming ; the land is leased to peasants, who 
usually pay as rent a proportion of the harvest, one-fifth 
to one-third. These small farmers ore driven down to 
a low level of existence by the absence of any legislation 



AT THE PRESENT DAY 77 

giving them security of tenure, and this also prevents any 
effective work for the amelioration of their condition. In 
many regions they suffer from excessive division of their 
small properties, which cuts down their existence to the 
very minimum. 

On top of this there were special institutions born of 
the limited wisdom of the Middle Ages, but readily taken 
over sometimes even by the mandatory governments, 
such as that of collective penalties when it was impossible 
to discover the authorship of crimes or outrages ; these 
might bring economic ruin to whole villages or districts. 
Latterly the national governments in Turkey, Iran and 
Egypt have tried to improve the lot of the peasants by the 
provision of small credits and by taxation reform. 

The situation of the peasant is a most serious social 
and economic problem in all the countries of the Near 
East. The transition from a primitive economic level 
to the modern capitalistic world, involving a complete 
break with his habits of thought and life, needs to be 
made easier for him by governmental measures of protec- 
tion and an understanding and sympathetic consideration 
of his position. The national governments recognize 
the necessity of protecting the peasant during the 
transition period from exploitation of his economic 
weakness and inexperience and from a diminution of 
his possessions, from the danger of landlessness and 
proletarianization. Indigenous agriculture suffers from 
the great shortage of capital ; the peasant, indeed, is 
entirely without capital ; he not only has no working 
capital, so that he is dependent on the usurer, but his 
whole live stock and implements are of infinitesimal 
value. 

In earlier times, before the influx of modern cheap 
factory-made goods, the peasant and his family carried 
on in their leisure hours an artistically developed home 
industry which met the needs of home and family and 
provided remunerative occupation at times when there 
was no work to do on the land- Household utensils and 
clothing had an individual character ; the peasant was 



78 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

proud of the good work put into them ; everything was 
made with the natural popular feeling for form and 
colour, and embroidery and carpets aroused the admira- 
tion of Europeans. In recent times this home industry 
has greatly declined ; on the other hand, with the develop- 
ment of urban industry, the opportunity has come to the 
peasant of work away from home during the months in 
whic'h there is little or nothing to do in the fields. Agri- 
culture did not offer him sufficient support even to meet 
his own poor needs, and he sought employment for wages 
on public works and in the building trade in the towns ; 
there has not yet been an actual flight from the country 
into the towns, but nevertheless where the peasant has 
been fortunate he has become an element in the urban 
labour supply. 

Urban economic life has developed differently in the 
ports and in the towns of the oases. Trade with Europe 
was concentrated in the ports ; European elements settled 
in them in early times, mixed with the Christian Levantine 
population, and produced the type of " Levantine " 
who became the middleman between Europe and the Near 
East a denationalized class, shrewd and exceedingly 
active, but often unscrupulous and given over to senseless 
luxury* The peculiar character of the internal water 
supply has resulted in massed populations settling in the 
oases while the desert all round was uninhabited. These 
oases thus developed into urban centres around which 
village settlements came into existence in a narrow but 
fertile space. Such an oasis city as, for instance, 
Damascus, has a peculiar character of its own the 
closely packed city in the midst of rich vegetation, with 
swiftly naming water and many canals in the oasis, 
houses with marble courts shaded by trees and cooled 
by fountains, orchards and fields always green; and 
all round, visible almost everywhere from the slightest 
elevation, the desert always threatening encroachment, 
yellow sand, bare, dust-covered rocks, passing suddenly, 
without any transition stage, into rich, watered oasis 
country. 



AT THE PRESENT DAY 79 

These oasis cities have for ages been centres of trade 
and industry. But here as in the ports the despotic 
form of government has prevented the development of 
any spirit of free citizenship. Here, too, one finds a class 
of middlemen related to the Levantine type, mostly 
Christian Syrians and Armenians, of outstanding intel- 
ligence and energy, and like all minorities in the Near 
East inspired by an extraordinarily strong sense of 
solidarity with one another. The Mohammedan 
prohibition of interest and the various expedients for 
circumventing it have encouraged usury rather than the 
reverse. Financial business lay in the hands of the 
traders, though they had very little capital. Commerce 
was the only form of economic activity in which there was 
any appreciable accumulation of capital ; in other fields 
such money as was obtained was hoarded or invested in 
personal property and jewellery. 

In urban as in rural economy the lack of an organized 
system of small credit was acutely felt. Of the two 
branches of urban economic life, trade and industry, only 
trade worked with a certain capital ; with the complica- 
tion and the mobility of commercial business it was 
easier to place trading capital beyond the reach of 
arbitrary authorities than industrial and agricultural 
capital. 

The urban industries had been famous from of old 
and were able to continue in their traditional form down 
to the latest times* In view of the Oriental taste for 
sumptuous clothing and for jewellery, the clothing 
industry and the jewellery, metal, and leather industries 
grew to importance. The impulse to make money was 
not the primary motive ; as in the Middle Ages, these 
industries served only to provide a living for the 
practitioner, who worked slowly, full of the sense of art 
and of intelligent deliberation ; but there was no pro- 
duction to order for special customers as in medieval 
Europe, only production for the market, for the unknown 
customer of the bazaar. The artisan " with his super- 
fluity of time could put imagination into his work, express 



80 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

his whole individuality in every object, no matter how 
unimportant it might seem. Customers had always 
insisted on individuality in his articles, and the richer 
class demanded goods of high quality. His own joy in 
beautiful work was a great incentive. So there came into 
existence the wonderfully clever little works of art in 
leather and metal work, wood carving, silk dyeing, and 
embroidery. All the wonderful charm for our eyes in all 
Oriental handwork is due largely to this artist's attitude 
towards industry, which makes of shoe and cloak and 
turban, cup and jug, bolt and window and door, everything, 
from the smallest everyday utensil to the ctipola of a 
mosque, a masterpiece of beauty, with individual differ- 
ences from shop to shop, from oasis to oasis, from region 
to region. Here again art and science went hand in hand, 
A particularly fine piece was shown only to the real 
connoisseur, not to the mere buyer. And the seller could 
proudly produce his little wares hour after hour, even if 
nothing was bought." (Reinhard Junge.) In the narrow 
lanes of Baghdad, with their ugly and short-lived clay 
houses, there are continual surprises in the wonderfully 
individual execution and the rich and careful carving of 
doors and balconies, which give each of the richer houses 
an individual dignity and beauty even amid its pathetic 
dilapidation. Often a particular trade is in the hands of 
a religious or ethnical group, in which the tradition is 
carried on from generation to generation, as, for instance, 
the silversmith's work of the peculiar old sect of the 
Sabaeans, who live to this day, to the number of three 
to five thousand souls, in Mesopotamia, 

Not only all trade but all industry is concentrated 
in the bazaar, which is the centre of all the town life. 
Here the various trades possessed their own streets, and 
the modern division of a town into a residential quarter 
and a business quarter, the two being clearly marked off 
from one another, was always followed in the layout of 
Eastern towns, where the quietness of the lanes of the 
residential quarter is only broken by the hawkers passing 
through and not by the bustle of commerce* 



AT THE PRESENT DAY 81 

In Arabian countries trade was never looked down on ; 
for most people, indeed, the ideal was to get into the 
trading class. Such wealth as existed had originated in 
trade. Agricultural and industrial activities were tied 
to a spot, and it was trade that provided the connection 
between the various oases and countries and became 
the economic pillar of the unity of an empire or state. 

While the life of the nomads of the deserts and steppes 
was one of freedom and of almost anarchical decentraliza- 
tion, there developed in the great river oases of the Nile 
valley and of Mesopotamia a highly centralized form of 
state. For the inhabitants of these oases could only exist 
in the midst of the desert if they devoted a regularly 
ordered and regularly shared labour to the task of 
irrigation. The unified direction of great masses of 
workers which was needed for capturing and making use 
of the floods led in these regions to the creation of mighty 
states under despotic rule ; it also required at an early 
date an intensification of cultivation to secure adequate 
yield. On the other hand, the true Mediterranean 
climate of the Levantine coast, of Syria and Asia Minor, 
with ample rain and more widespread springs and subsoil 
water, permitted cultivation without big concentrations 
of labour for water control, and so made it possible for 
decentralized city and oasis states to come into existence. 
But even in those regions with settled populations the 
scarcity of water and the irregularity of therainscompelled 
close settlement* 

This closeness of settlement, and the existence of the 
open market or village square as the centre of all life, 
go to explain why in recent times, with the fall of despot- 
ism, the interest of the whole population, including the 
peasantry, in politics is so keen, far keener than any other 
interest. Newspapers are eagerly read and passionately 
discussed ; they are read out to those who are unable to 
read, and in the country districts the number of illiterates 
is very great ; newspapers enjoy great prestige ; great 
faith is placed, often in a naive way, in the printed word. 
Latterly there has also been an improvement in the 



82 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

contents of newspapers. Books are little read ; there is no 
modern organization of the publishing and sale of books, 
and there has hardly been even a beginning of public 
libraries on the modern plan ; thus the newspapers are 
the only means of penetration of news and knowledge 
from the civilized world in general among the masses, 
or even among the educated classes. 

Newspapers and reports spread by word of mouth, 
conversations in the bazaar and the caf6s, and the more 
and more frequent visiting of the towns with the aid of the 
modern means of transport, have also made the peasant 
an active element in politics. As everywhere, it is the 
townsman who takes the lead in political life, above all the 
educated townsman. His influence is beginning, as in 
Europe, to replace that of the landowner and the village 
elders, who used to monopolize power, though in colonial 
rule the governments, often in co-operation with native 
reactionaries, do their best to exclude the towns from 
influence over the countryside. Experience has taught 
the populations to suspect all the intentions of their 
rulers, and they are ready at all times to be sharply 
critical of government measures and little inclined for 
constructive co-operation. It is a general characteristic 
of political life in the Mediterranean countries and the 
Near East, as also, for instance, in South America, that 
there is little readiness for patient practical detail work, 
for steady conquest of cultural and economic advances ; 
energies are used up on wrong lines, and axe often 
exhausted in rhetorical declamation. Political passions 
axe easily aroused, and are capable of producing great 
deeds and unselfish sacrifices for the nation and for 
freedom, but there is little respect for the daily work 
which is the basis of all advance, and in thefaoeof obstinate 
resistance there is a tendency to give up the struggle, 
though without abandoning the political aim, which fills 
men's minds almost to the exclusion of all else, 

As the effort to secure political and economic indepen- 
dence unites all sections of the population and forms the 
common political programme, there axe few parties with 



AT THE PRESENT DAY 83 

fixed programmes or with definite sociological theories 
or fundamental views of life ; the parties are distinguished 
more by the personality of their leaders than by theoretical 
principles. Consequently the change over from one party 
to another is comparatively easy and frequent ; parties 
form and dissolve in connection with the personal ascen- 
dancy and decline of the various leaders. 

The personal element, and the tendency of likes and 
dislikes to outweigh rational and practical considerations, 
often lead to nepotism and to the granting of personal 
favours which interfere with the quality of administrative 
service. " The feeling of friendship often outweighs the 
sense of justice and the sense of duty," as Hermann 
Lautensach writes of analogous conditions in Spain. 
Adolf Reichwein writes of South America : " This mixing 
up of general considerations with personal interests in 
political life has remained up to the present a disease of 
Latin America, out of which it is only with difficulty that 
a way can be found to a true policy founded on the needs 
of the polis," and this applies to many of the Mediter- 
ranean and Levant countries. But for that very reason 
it is possible for strong patriotic personalities like Saad 
Zaghlul Pasha in Egypt to found parties with the simplest 
of programmes, summarized in the two terms Independence 
and Popular Rule, which give evidence of a stability, last- 
ing for many years, which is rarely to be found in other 
circumstances. Patriotism and the strong personality 
of a leader can even overcome the constant tendency 
to faction and disunion which in other circumstances is 
so constantly evinced, as, for instance, among the Greeks, 
even at the time of their wars and struggles for liberation. 
Of one element in the psychology of the Greeks James 
David Bourchier writes : " Sustained mental industry 
and careful accuracy are distasteful to them." This can 
be said of most of the peoples of the Mediterranean and the 
Levant, although often in a very restricted sense. Their 
thoroughness often does not go very deep ; they scarcely 
have the patience and perseverance for working for days 
and months at the solution of a problem. On the other 



84 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

hand, they have a quick comprehension, a gift of oratory, 
great experience in the handling of men, and a natural 
gift of courtesy. Moreover, among all classes, especially 
the middle class and the peasantry, the hunger for 
education is very great. A tradition dating from pre- 
capitalist times leads them to prefer a humanistic educa- 
tion to a technical one. Their ideal is to enter the 
service of the state, and so there easily arises a black- 
coated proletariat of educated men who are shut out from 
the official career of their ambition by the superfluity of 
candidates. As business life is entirely in the hands of 
better-trained Europeans or semi-Europeans, there are 
often insufficient opportunities for the native population 
to take up business careers, unless the national state 
paves the way for them as Turkey has now done. So 
long as the influence of alien powers or capital keeps the 
state at the level of a colony or semi-colonial country and 
prevents it from acting first and foremost in the interest 
of the native population, the great lack of capital and 
experience of the population makes possible this retention 
of the control of native trade and industry in alien hands. 
This in turn forms the greatest obstacle to native training 
and progress in the higher forms of economic life. 

In all these countries there has been in the course of 
the last few centuries not only a retrogression of culture 
but also a fall in the population. One of their most 
difficult political and economic problems is the sparseness 
of the population* But if erroneous inferences are to 
be avoided it is important to use great caution in drawing 
conclusions as to the density of population by having 
regard simply to the numerical extent of the population 
and the size of the country. For all these countries are 
very largely uninhabitable desert, with closely packed 
masses of people in the cultivable oases and valleys, 
The total territory of Egypt (this, it is true, is an extreme 
example) is over a million square kilometres ; of this 
only 32,000 square kilometres are cultivable, having been 
made so by means of expensive irrigation systems. Qa 
this small axea, one-thirtieth of the whole, there are 



AT THE PRESENT DAY 85 

living more than fourteen million people, and on the whole 
of the remaining territory no more than a few tens of 
thousands. A totally different conclusion is, of course, 
arrived at as to the density of population according as 
regard is had to the whole surface or only to the cultivable 
surface. The same is true of the Arabian peninsula, 
whose enormous territory appears to be very thinly 
populated but is probably greatly over-populated, so that, 
at all events with the water supply as it is at present, 
the population of the peninsula is only able to lead a rough 
and entirely primitive existence. 

In the last two hundred years there has been an 
extraordinary increase in the population of Europe; 
the growth of European trade and power is bound up 
with this increase in population. Meanwhile the popula- 
tion in the Ottoman empire and in Iran has remained 
stationary, with a high birth rate but an equally high 
rate of mortality. In the Levant, as in Spain and 
southern Italy, malaria has been ubiquitous andhas under- 
mined the stamina of the population. Bad water supply 
and entirely inadequate health and education systems 
have continued almost to this day to decimate the 
population, which is ignorant of the most primitive rules 
of hygiene and makes up for this ignorance by a luxuriant 
overgrowth of superstition. In addition there have 
been frequent wars and the burden of years of service in 
the army, which have made impossible any increase in 
population. 

The economic and cultural decline were due in the old 
Ottoman empire and in Persia to the obsolete form of the 
state and to the lack of enlightened patriotism among the 
ruling classes. The despotism prevalent in these countries 
killed all initiative and produced universal insecurity. 
Its intrinsic element of arbitrariness and irrationality, the 
incalculable element in life, made every attempt at 
foresight and calculation, at rationalization of the 
juridical and economic system, illusory* It was impos- 
sible to carry on any steady enterprise in any field. In 
the absence of any public life the formation of character 



86 MAN AND HIS ENVIRONMENT 

was almost impossible ; men's spirits were ruled by blind 
fatalism. The suspiciousness of the population prevented 
any formation of capital, producing either a dull resig- 
nation or wasteful and spoliatory accumulation in the 
effort to get rich as quickly as possible. The adminis- 
trative officials possessed a narrow range of vision, and 
were incompetent and corrupt, the judiciary were no less 
corrupt. 

Contact with Europe has given these peoples the 
vision, on which they have acted, of a rational state 
inspired by the sense of justice, and they have awakened 
to a new self-confidence and to a realization of their 
dignity and their rights. They are proceeding now to 
revolutionize the whole of their constitutional and 
economic life. Their experiences of the recent past and 
their fear, fully justified by the weaknesses of the transition 
period, of the alienation of their industry and trade and 
the throttling of native economic activities and of their 
liberties, have led these peoples to insist on complete 
self-government and on national control by their own 
people over their state and their economic life, A new 
social order is coming into existence, in many respects 
nearer to that of European countries than to that which 
only a few decades ago was regarded as the typically 
Oriental society. In this transformation of the social 
order the individual is being trained in a new outlook, 
in new ambitions, and in a new activity. 



CHANGING MAN IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT 

THE change proceeding among the people of the Neax 
East in the twentieth century is only part of a universal 
process, the Europeanization of all humanity, at work 
to-day even in the remotest regions of the world. The 
Europe which has grown up since the Renaissance and the 
Enlightenment, the Europe of freedom of the person, of 
the critical play of the intellect, of technical control of 
natural resources, has so amply demonstrated its 
superiority over older and perhaps also deeper civilizations 
that they have been unable to withstand its penetration. 
This Europeanization is a process both of education and 
of resistance. It can be brought to nations from without ; 
in that case it clothes itself in the forms of imperialism, 
training the peoples in European economic, technical, 
and general progress in its own interest, and only to the 
extent its own interest requires, but taking care to 
prevent, or at least not actively to promote, any deeper 
measure of Europeanization, of popular education, and 
of modernization of native trade and industry. To this 
end it unites with and strengthens those forces which in 
their own conservative interests are opposed to more 
far-reaching Europeanization usually princes, nobles, 
and priests, but often also a small upper class of big 
capitalists who profit by the newly-opened commercial 
relations* 

But after initial resistance Europeanization may 
proceed from the peoples themselves ; it then clothes 
itself in the forms of nationalism, and penetrates much 
more deeply into the whole life of the people. It does 
not merely affect the upper strata, but creates a new 
nation, which uses the means of Europeanization to drive 
Europe out of its territory. Often both types of 
Europeanization are found intimately associated together. 
And always Europeanization is a very complex process, 

87 



88 CHANGING MAN 

influencing and altering the attitude and general outlook 
of the individual, his intellectual and emotional reaction 
to his environment, and also the commercial and industrial 
methods and the social life of the community. A new 
picture of the world, a new valuation of life, a new activity 
inspire in the first place a numerically small upper 
stratum, the " intellectuals ", who are unsettled as they 
have not been for centuries by contact with the history 
of European civilization, of which they learn at school, 
and with the achievements of the machine age. From 
this stratum these new elements spread through the 
masses of the people, slowly, resisted rather than pro- 
moted in the countries under imperialist domination, 
more quickly and with deliberate encouragement in the 
countries of nationalist resistance* 

Imperialism, in this case the intrusion of Europe in the 
East, and nationalism, in this case the resistance of the 
East to European dominance, condition and inter-pene- 
trate one another. Europeanization in either form is not 
a question of race or religion but one of the stage of 
civilization and social progress reached in the course of 
history. The nations which have begun to be European- 
ized or have Europeanized themselves in the twentieth 
century may be Orthodox Christians (Russians, 
Armenians), Catholic Christians (Spaniards, South 
Americans, Filipinos), Mohammedans (Turks, Iranians), 
or Buddhists ; the essential thing is the transition from 
a feudal, medieval, religious framework to a new age of 
machine industry and rationalized trade and of critical 
and liberal thinking. Thus in the Levant as elsewhere 
there is no fundamental difference between the changes 
that have come as between one religion and another ; 
there has not been merely a crisis or reformation of 
Islam, but Mohammedans and native Christians and 
Jews have been passing through the same change and 
transition. For the general outlook of the men of the 
Near East has not been determined so much by religion 
or race as by stage of historic development, which has 
found expression in all the fundamental aspects of their 



IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT 89 

life. Arnold Toynbee's dictum concerning Oriental 
Christendom that " our common Christianity is not a 
living fact but an historical curiosity " well describes the 
conditions, except that the Europeanization of the 
Christians through political conditions and better oppor- 
tunities of education (mission schools, emigration) has 
often proceeded more rapidly, at least on the surface. 

The transition from one stage of civilization to another 
is always a painful and confused process and seldom 
pleasant to watch. An old civilization, self-contained and 
harmonious in its working, is destroyed ; and then the 
internal balance, the peaceful security, and the dignified 
elegance which characterized pre-industrial civilizations, 
begin to disappear, Morality, until then strictly enforced 
by custom, family tradition, and religious precept, 
slackens; the unknown, its whole nature often com- 
pletely unfamiliar, faces men unprepared and perplexes 
them. The inherited sense of beauty cultivated through 
centuries of craftsmanship, the thoughtful leisure of a 
life lived without haste, generally in a narrow environ- 
ment, are destroyed by the machine, its products and its 
tempo. Much that is good and solid gives place to a 
Europeanization which often is only external, a merely 
superficial assimilation, sometimes, indeed, an adoption 
of the least desirable features of European, civilization. 
Men are uprooted and easily lose their hold. They do 
not penetrate the essentials of modern Western life, 
its humanism, or the intellectual bases of science and 
research, but are out to adopt only the " practical ". 

But all this belongs inevitably to the transition 
period symptoms of decay intermingled with signs of 
advance, the Janus-head of a period pregnant with 
destiny. No regrets can hold up this process. In this 
awakening out of centuries of passivity, narrowness, and 
rigidity, there lies a new start full of promise. The 
civilizations which are being weakened and transformed 
through contact with Europe axe venerable and beautif ulin 
outward aspect, but have long lost their native virtue, they 
are without creative activity, and without self -renovating 



90 CHANGING MAN 

vitality. European superiority, often clothed in a 
spirit of moral arrogance, has produced in those who 
came first under its influence a feeling of hatred of their 
own most recent past with its humiliations and exploita- 
tion, corruption and helplessness. The Europeans, 
presuming on real or imagined cultural superiority, proud 
of their hygiene and technique and strong through their 
superiority in capital and organization, looked down 
on the non-Europeans, the " natives ", and regarded them 
as material for their economic and political domination. 

This very period of transition, of the penetration of 
European culture and economic forms among the native 
society which has thus been robbed of its former strength 
without being able to gain at once an equal footing in 
trade and organization with Europe this time of weak- 
ness is often exploited by European groups in order to 
gain strong positions in the political and economic fields, 
to secure concessions and fertile land, and to prolong the 
period of weakness of the society in transformation* The 
great value to the native society of political independence 
is that it enables it to protect itself during the weakness 
of the transition period, that it can place the resources 
of the state, its legislative power and means of organiza- 
tion, in the service of economic and cultural advance, 
while protectorates, mandates, and other forms of colonial 
expansion leave the native society unprotected at the 
very time when protection is most needed, and thus do 
irreparable injury to its future development. 

The will to Europeanization seeks to offer protection 
against this. At the outset some of the native leaders axe 
fascinated by the glamour, the freedom and beauty of 
European civilization, not only by its external wealth 
but also by the internal power of its life-giving, adven- 
turous fullness ; they are in danger of losing themselves 
in Europe, of becoming semi-Europeans with no roots 
to them ; but many realize that the inevitable European- 
ization has to be led into sale paths, taken in hand instead 
of being passively and helplessly submitted to. 

This transformation of man and society is a extremely 



IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT 91 

difficult task; the process which in Europe went on 
undisturbed through many decades among people living 
in independent states, on familiar intellectual bases, and 
amid an incomparable intellectual freedom has here to 
be assimilated hastily in as many years, often without 
full insight into the intellectual bases of the proud 
structure and the creative forces which erected it, and 
almost always amid perpetual pressure, weakening and 
obstructing from without. This process of Europeaniza- 
tion, as a necessary resistance and self-defence, is imposed 
from without, but it is of more importance as an inner 
transformation, and soon as an autonomous growth and 
an advance to a fuller life and to an independent 
intellectual and social activity. It is going on alike in 
the Near East and the Far East, in Russia and in South 
America, in all the colonial and semi-colonial countries 
which desire to enter on equal economic and political 
terms into the great society, into the economic and 
cultural unity of humanity which is being formed under 
the direction of ideas emanating from Europe. It 
embraces all sides of communal and personal life : a new 
self-confidence and an awakening activity, popular 
education, industrialization, literary renascence, and a 
struggle for political independence. 

This all-embracing revolution, which has received its 
first impulses from without, is capable of leading to one- 
sidedness and superficiality. A heavy price has to be 
paid for its lessons. Much that seems immature is the 
outcome of a suspicion of Europe justified by experience, 
a heightened sensitiveness due to earlier humiliations 
suffered and not forgotten, the fruit of Europe's attitude 
toward the natives. Only a changed attitude on the 
part of the Europeans, inspired by understanding and the 
readiness to be of service^ a consideration and respect 
for sensitiveness and for the non-European peoples* 
sense of their own dignity, can bridge the gulf and clear 
away xrdsunderstaiadings, while liberating the process of 
Europeanization from its regrettable elements and 
promoting a real cultural rapprochement^ 



92 CHANGING MAN 

For the complex process of rendering dynamic a 
society that has become static and rigid but is developing 
politically, economically, in social organization, and in 
intellectual life, the conception of nationalism offers the 
best general description. The emergence of the 
European peoples from the Middle Ages into the present 
epoch took place under the banner of nationalism. The 
nation became the highest political, social, and economic 
form of organization ; nationalism became an intellectual 
attitude that determined men's course. All the character- 
istic events of the age of nationalism in Europe are now 
being repeated in the Orient. Here nationalism also 
makes possible a synthesis between the new and the 
inherited intellectual outlook. "The problem of the 
modernization of the Muslim Turkish community began 
to bear most heavily on precisely those circles which were 
most deeply convinced of the necessity of this moderniza- 
tion and yet were most intimately attached to all that 
was good in the faith of their fathers and the national 
character*" (Richard Hartmann.) Nationalism was to 
establish the synthesis between Europe and the national 
character, between future and past, between the mother 
country and humanity. The Turkish nationalist thinker 
Ziya Goek Alp (1875-1925) enunciated a triple solution 
for the transformation of his people, which may be applied 
to all nations in transition : nationalism, Europeanization, 
religious reform. By Europeanization or modernization 
he meant "the acceptance without reservation of the 
civilization of the modern West " ; nationalism meant 
for him Turkization, " the development of the intellectual 
forces slumbering in the Turkish people, in order that a 
national culture may emanate from these forces**; 
religious reform he called Mamization, " a return to the 
intellectual content and spirit of the true and original 
Islam, sacrificing all later theological exegeses and 
perversions which have been sanctioned by the church 
of Islam, and sacrificing even the commands of the 
Prophet himself where these were applicable only in past 
periods of history,'* 



IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT 93 

Where the nation becomes the highest form of 
organization, religion loses much of its earlier authority 
over public and private life. The citizen becomes of 
more importance than the co-religionist. Right down 
to the eighteenth century in Europe full citizenship 
belonged only to the member of the state religion : 
cuius regio illius religio. Religious minorities had not 
full rights of citizenship. Protestants were driven out 
of Catholic countries ; Catholics in Protestant countries 
only secured their emancipation about the middle of 
the nineteenth century ; Jews lived in ghettoes. The 
Near East was only a few decades behind the West in 
regard to religious emancipation. The first steps to give 
full equality of citizenship between Mohammedan and 
non-Mohammedan subjects of the Ottoman empire were 
taken as early as 1839 by the hatti-sherif (decree of the 
Sultan) of that year, and especially by the hatti-Jiumayun 
(imperial decree) of 1856. But" at that time public 
opinion in the Near East was not ripe for this advance ; 
the Oriental state remained based on religion, and the 
religious minorities led an autonomous existence only 
loosely incorporated in the state. As in Europe, religion 
has now (not only in Islam but equally in Oriental 
Christendom) had to suffer the loss of its position as ruler 
of all life ; as in Europe, it has had to give way before the 
emergence of politics, law, and economics as autonomous 
provinces of life, beyond the control or influence of 
religion. This is certainly a critical process for the 
religions of the East, but it does not mean the end of them, 
any more than the Enlightenment and Rationalism made 
an end of religion in Europe. A great process of seculari- 
zation has set in. The organization of the state, the 
administration of law, the education system in the Levant 
have all been hitherto within the sphere of religion, alike 
among the Mohammedans, the eastern Christians, and the 
Jews ; they are emancipating themselves and becoming 
a temporal concern. Religion is becoming a private 
affair, and the citizen, defined by his allegiance to state 
and not to church, is emerging. Nationalism forms the 



94 CHANGING MAN 

bridge over which the religious communities formerly 
strictly segregated are meeting for collaboration in 
political and social life. Differences and disagreements 
remain, just as they do between Catholics and Ptotestants 
in European countries ; but they are overborne in the 
unity of the national idea. Community of religion is 
losing its political importance ; it retains it now only 
where religious and ethnical frontiers coincide, as, to 
quote a European example, in Ireland. In Egypt or in 
Palestine Mohammedans and Christians axe entirely 
united in their political demands and activities ; they 
feel themselves at one in race and speech, though they 
retain their loyalty to their several religious communi- 
ties. 

Alongside this process of secularization there has 
gone a process of technical advance ; machine industry 
is conquering the Near East. At first there were only 
external signs of this penetration, which began to reach 
to the remotest villages : oil stoves, sewing machines, 
gramophones. With the arrival of the first machines 
which required skilled attention the difficulties of technical 
progress quickly showed themselves : there were no skilled 
workers to attend to the complicated machines and 
above all to keep them in repair. They were soon worn 
out and so proved extraordinarily costly. It is only in 
quite recent times that steam and motor-driven machinery 
has begun to receive expert care, repair shops have come 
into existence, and a local machine industry on a small 
scale has begun to develop. The advance in scientific- 
mindedness which has celebrated its triumph in Europe 
ever since the Renaissance is as unknown to the Near 
East as it was to medieval Europe. What is happening 
now is a growth of interest in technical advance, but 
though this advance is gladly accepted it is not yet 
promoted by any original contributions. Nevertheless 
the entry into the age of machine civilization is gradually 
transforming people and helping to give them a new 
mentality, The daemonic element in the machine, its 
tendency to take charge and play havoc among its creators, 



IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT 95 

is still something unknown in the Near East, where 
industry is in its very first stages. 

Scientific discovery has brought in Europe an 
unexampled increase of population ; it has greatly 
reduced human dependence on Nature, has averted the 
danger of harvest failures, has made possible an undreamt- 
of intensification of industry and trade, and has greatly 
improved the standard of living of the masses. The 
Near East, with its sparsely populated regions, its 
mainly extensive agriculture, and its incredibly low 
standard of living, is in need of machine industry. 
Industry may be destroying the creative virtues of tradi- 
tional handicraft, the innate sense of beauty, the 
intellectual concentration of the hand-worker ; but it 
is precisely through scientific invention and discovery 
that the man of creative individuality has advanced to 
his greatest achievements since the Renaissance and 
worked vast miracles. It is in technical advance that the 
Easterner senses this qualityof greatness in the European, 
long before he is able to understand its intellectual bases. 
Sometimes he may gain a glimpse of the fact that technical 
advance faces men with new and difficult problems, that 
man, who created machine industry, is ceasing to be its 
master, that his creation, driven by a daemon of its own, 
is growing independently and without end. All this 
the Easterner may suspect without being able to compre- 
hend from his own experience the insistence of machine 
civilization on growth and spread ; but the conquering 
march of science can no longer be stemmed ; the 
Easterner must receive the conqueror with open arms 
if he is to exist. And for him technical advance is still 
displaying all the splendour of its youth. Only later 
will he be faced in common with the European by the 
problem of setting limits to the daemonic independent 
growth of machine industry, of subordinating it organically 
to a conscious feeling of responsibility of man for his 
fellow-men and subordinating it to the new super- 
national idea of humanity, which technical advance has 
helped to bring to life, and which has begun completely 
to change the face of the world* 



96 CHANGING MAN 

It is in Turkey that the transformation of the state 
and of social life in the Levant has proceeded farthest. 
The Constitution, the legal system, trade and industry, 
and cultural life have been radically transformed. But 
Turkey is not alone in this respect ; she has only been 
able, as an independent state, to carry out these changes 
most thoroughly and without consideration of the interests 
of foreigners ; the same changes are being pushed through 
with more difficulty in Iran and Iraq, Syria and Egypt. 
Everywhere it is being recognized that the foundations 
of social and cultural life of the past are no longer intact. 
An intelligible conservatism often shows itself in desperate 
opposition to the radicalism with which changes have 
been made in Turkey ; the imitation of the Turkish 
example is opposed in Iran by the influence of the 
Mohammedan priesthood, in Lebanon by that of the 
Christian clergy, in Egypt by that of the king and the 
court ; in all these countries, except Iran, the influence is 
especially felt of certain European governments and 
foreign colonies, which are too greatly interested in the 
maintenance of the old conditions. But in spit of all 
these hindrances the structural change which has taken 
place in Turkey in the course of ten years is typical and 
characteristic of all the countries of the Levant, and, 
indeed, of the universal process of Europeanization by 
means of which states hitherto economically and politi- 
cally dependent or semi-dependent on Europe have 
latterly been emancipating themselves from Europe* 

In Turkey the fifty years of preparatory work of the 
intellectuals had created a much more receptive soil for 
structural change than in countries which had scarcely 
been accessible to European influence until the beginning 
of the twentieth century. Turkey had also created 
among the masses the political and psychological con- 
ditions for radical structural change through her 
victorious campaign against the Greeks, who were allied 
with the Entente Powers, and through the tearing up of 
the Treaty of Sfcvres* Her people had not only a 
sovereign independence unknown in the other countries 



IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT 97 

of the Levant, except Iran, but had also gained a new 
self-confidence and a trust in the leader of the war of 
liberation, who set himself at the head of the process of 
modernization in the country. A description of the main 
lines of the structural change in Turkey will show also the 
tendencies at work to-day in all the countries of the Near 
East, changing the face of these peoples and countries. 

A structural change as radical as that which has been 
effected in Turkey within ten years is only possible with a 
unity of leadership and a leadership with firm purpose. 
Turkey thus has only one party, which controls every 
field of public life. The statutes of this party, the 
Republican People's Party, of 1923 lay down in their 
first Article that " The aim of the Party is government 
through the people and for the people and the making 
of Turkey into a modern state/' The old Ottoman 
state had not been a modern state. At its head had stood 
the Khalif , who at least in theory had been the ruler 
of all the Faithful, in other words of all Mohammedans. 
The Khalif was a temporal prince, but his sphere of 
authority was not a national state but a universal 
state built up on a religious basis and held together by 
religious bonds. A modern state required the disappear- 
ance of the Khalif ate, for which it could no longer find 
room. 

On November 1st, 1922, the Turkish Great National 
Assembly deposed the last Turkish Sultan. From then 
on, although the formal announcement did not come 
until later, Turkey was a republic, in which the whole 
power proceeded from the people and lay in the hands 
of the representatives of the people. Considerations of 
personal policy played their part in the deposition of the 
Sultan ; he had set himself against the national movement 
for independence and, like many other Oriental princes, 
had tried to come to terms with the imperialism of the 
Western Powers. There still remained the Khalifate. 
A prince of the imperial house, acceptable to the Turkish 
National Assembly, was appointed Khalif. But, robbed 
of its temporal power, the Khalif ate was reduced to a 



98 CHANGING MAN 

nonentity ; it had never been a doctrinal authority. 
And just as there was no room for a Sultan in a country 
which had set out to give itself " government through the 
people and for the people ", there was no room for a Khalif 
" in a modern state ". On March 3rd, 1924, the Khalifate 
was abolished in Turkey ; the last Khalif went, like his 
predecessor, into exile, to a Christian country. An 
institution more than twelve hundred years old came to 
its end. On February 29th, 1924, the last selamlik of a 
Khalif took place, his last ceremonial attendance at a 
mosque for the Friday prayer. This scene, which had so 
long been characteristic of the splendour of Oriental life 
on the shores of the Bosphorus, was witnessed in 
Constantinople for the last time. 

The end had come rapidly, but it had been inevitable. 
In the Europeanization of the Near East, which brings 
with it secularization, the replacement of religion by the 
nation as the basis of the life of the state, any attempt 
to revive the institution of the Khalifate was fore- 
doomed to failure, not only because there was no pretender 
powerful enough and independent enough to wield the 
sword of Islam, but because the conditions on which alone 
a Khalifate can rest had disappeared* It is dead not 
only for modern Turkey but for Islam* Islam is still 
a spiritual power and will remain so, even in Turkey. 
It is a bond of union between all its adherents, and has 
actually gained new strength where Islam feels itself 
oppressed by Europe. But it is changing, becoming 
secularized and assuming a national character. Turkey 
has gone farthest in this as in other respects. Seculariza- 
tion meant the emancipation of the Constitution, of the 
legal system, and of education, from their religious bases. 
Nationalization meant the saturation of the Islam whose 
historic bases had been Arabian, and whose essential 
character had been supemational, with Turkish 
nationalism. Through its secularization Islam is approach- 
ing the position held by Christianity in Western European 
states. Through its nationalization it may come to 
resemble in its organization the territorial churches 



IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT 99 

which arose out of the Reformation, or the churches of 
the East, which also administer a common religious 
domain under separate national and lingual forms. 

The various stages of these two processes rapidly 
followed one another. On March 1st, 1924, when the 
final abolition of the Khalif ate was under discussion in 
the Great National Assembly, Mustapha Kemal enunciated 
the programme of " the 'liberation of politics from 
religious preconceptions ". Two days later the Ministry 
of Religious Affairs was abolished and the closing of all 
madrasahs (mosque schools) was decreed. Five weeks 
later the National Assembly introduced a new legal 
constitution, which abolished the sheria courts, ecclesias- 
tical courts which had administered justice under canon 
law. This effected the secularization of education and of 
the legal system ; both were withdrawn from the com- 
petence of religion and brought within that of the state. 
The process had already begun in the Ottoman empire 
before the world war ; it is now going on in all the states 
of the Near East, but in Turkey it has already been 
completed* At the opening of the Faculty of Law at 
Ankara (Angora) on November 5th, 1925, Mustapha 
Kemal declared : " To-day we are united by national 
and not by religious uniformity." The Koran verse 
42, 36, commands the Faithful " to settle their affairs in 
discussion with one another ", and forms the basis of 
democracy in Islam. It had been placed on a tablet in 
the Great National Assembly in the Arabic original. 
Now it was replaced by a tablet bearing in the Turkish 
language the inscription: "The power of the state 
proceeds from the people " an inscription which based 
democracy no longer on Islam and religion, but on the 
new principle of the sovereignty of the people. In the 
same month the Dervish monasteries were closed they 
had played a very important part in the religious life of 
Mohammedan Turkey and decrees were issued concern- 
ing the vestments of the priesthood and the exercise of 
its office. It was also decreed that public officials should 
dress entirely in the European style, in order to distinguish 



100 CHANGING MAN 

them unmistakably from the priesthood. At the end of 
1925 the European calendar was introduced in place of 
the Mohammedan. 

The most important step in the modernization of 
Turkish life took place in 1926 in the introduction of 
Western law. Until then the medieval canonical law of 
the various religious communities had governed all 
questions of personal, family, and inheritance law in 
Turkey. This had had disastrous consequences in two 
respects : the inhabitants of one and the same state had 
been under the jurisdiction of various systems of law, 
differing entirely with one another, in the very fields which 
cut most deeply into intimate daily life ; and the applica- 
tion of medieval law offered many obstacles to a 
modernization of family life. The law of contract and the 
law of real estate were governed by the mejdle, a statute 
book which combined principles of Islamic canon law and 
of French and Western law. All these laws were repealed 
in 1926. Within a year Turkey received a new civil 
code and law of contract on the Swiss model, a com- 
mercial code based on the German and Italian, and a 
criminal law on the Italian model* Thus in a very short 
time Turkish law was placed not only on a secular but on 
a thoroughly modern basis. In the matter of the modern- 
ization of the system of law, as in other fields, the 
Levantine states which are under European control are 
far behind Turkey, In these states the old Ottoman 
law continues in force. 

The Turkish Constitution still contained, however, 
the provision that Islam was the religion of the state. 
On April 10th, 1928, a law was passed by the National 
Assembly removing all religious expressions from the 
Constitution. The laicization of the Turkish state had 
now been completed ; all that remained to be done was 
to nationalize Islam, to clothe it in national dress. Until 
the nineteenth century Turkish culture had been a 
religious and humanist culture, resting on Islamic and on 
Arabian and Persian national bases* The classic Islamic 
literatures of the Arabs and Persians were the material 



IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT 101 

of the education of the cultivated Turk, whose language 
was impregnated with Arabic and Persian words and 
terms of speech. As Latin and to some extent Greek 
had in past centuries been the basis of the religious and 
humanist culture of Europe, so Arab and Persian culture 
had been the basis of Turkish intellectual life. Not until 
the nineteenth century had there entered also, as a new 
element in Turkish culture, the influence of the French 
language. With the awakening of nationalism the popular 
tongues in Europe had become the languages of literature 
and science, which had thus been given a more popularly 
assimilable form and had been brought closer to the 
everyday life of the mass of the people. Similarly the 
Turkish language, simplified under the influence of 
nationalism and modernism, brought into a more popular 
form, and divested of its humanist and classicist associa- 
tions, became an instrument of literature and science. In 
1929 a Turkish language committee was set up in Ankara 
to work out a grammar, rules for a unified Turkish ortho- 
graphy, and the publication of a Turkish dictionary in 
which all words borrowed from Persian and Arabian 
should be replaced by Turkish words. Similar efforts 
have been made in Cairo, Damascus, and Baghdad to 
compile an Arabian encyclopaedia and to subject the 
modern Arab vocabulary to scientific revision. But only 
in Turkey have the efforts been systematically pursued 
and promoted by legislation, 

A law of 1929 did away with the teaching of Arabic 
and Persian in the higher schools ; their place was to be 
taken by French and a second European language. This 
was one more step along the path of modernization and 
nationalization. 

As early as February 1928, the Friday prayer, the 
khufbah, had been recited in the mosques of Stamboul in 
Turkish instead of Arabic* A further step in the national- 
ization of Islam took place at the beginning of 1932. 
On January 22nd for the first time a sura, (chapter) of the 
Koran was recited by a famous prayer-leader in a 
Stamboul mosque in Turkish. The invocation with 



102 CHANGING MAN 

which the prayer-leader followed his reading, again in 
Turkish, reveals the new religious attitude : 

" Lord and God, thanks be to Thee and praise. 
From the seat of Thy power accept the Koran which has 
now been recited. We give to the souls of our Prophet 
Mohammed hail be to him ! and of all the Faithful 
the merit that is their due ; do Thou ordain that they 
receive their guerdon. Establish for ever the Turkish 
Republic, the expression of the national sovereignty ; 
grant success to our Republican administration, victory 
to our heroic army, happiness and well-being to our 
beloved fatherland and to the nation*" 

On February 3rd, the day of the Mohammedan festival 
of the 27th of the fast month of Ramadan, the mosque of 
St Sophia in Constantinople was crowded to its utmost 
when the most famous reciters of the Koran chanted 
the story of the birth of the Prophet, some mras from the 
Koran, and the prayers, in Turkish. The service was 
transmitted by wireless to every town in Turkey, receivers 
having been installed in the mosques. 

Secularization of Islam has been carried out along the 
same lines as in Turkey, although much more slowly 
and cautiously, and in the other countries of the Levant ; 
here, however, there is not the incentive to the nationaliza- 
tion of religion. In the Arab countries Islam, through 
its language and origin, has become most intimately 
associated with the national heritage ; in Persia the 
Shiite form of Islam has a national character of its own. 
But nowhere has the secularization of Islam been so 
clearly envisaged as in the report of the commission of 
the Stamboul Theological Faculty set up to discuss that 
reform in 1928. The report says : " Religion is a social 
institution, and must therefore be adapted to the needs 
of life and the laws of progress. In the Turkish 
democracy religion, like everything else, must enter into 
the new era of vitality which that democracy needs. It 
is indispensable that the teaching and the precepts of the 
Koran shall be re-interpreted and re*valued." The actual 
proposals in the report had reference to the outward 



IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT 103 

form of religious service, which was to be in Turkish, and 
to the intelligibility and intellectual standard of the 
preaching. " Religious life must be reformed with 
scientific means and with the aid of reason, so that it may 
advance in line with other social institutions and bear 
all the fruit it is able to give." 

Secularization and nationalism have also created a 
new educational system. In the nineteenth and even 
at the beginning of the twentieth century there existed 
everywhere in the Levant a double system of education : 
a mainly religious system, possessing numbers of 
elementary schools connected with the mosques or 
churches, in which the teaching consisted of not much 
more than merely making the children learn religious 
texts by heart ; and a mainly secular system, virtually 
confined to secondary schools for the children of the upper 
class undergoing preparation for a career in the public 
service. The vast majority of the population in Turkey, 
as elsewhere in the Levant, could neither read nor write. 
This was not merely the fault of Turkish misrule. Even 
in so thickly populated and prosperous a country as 
Egypt, where for forty years, from 1882 down to the 
declaration of independence in 1922, the British adminis- 
tration had been responsible for education, the census of 
1927 gave the number of men who could read and write 
as 20 per cent, of the population, and of women as only 
4 per cent. Of the boys of five to nineteen yeaxs 26 per 
cent, were attending school, and of the girls 8 per cent. 
Conditions were still worse in the rural districts. In 
Cairo 43 per cent, of the men and 20 per cent, of the 
women could read and write ; 50 per cent, of the boys 
and 30 per cent, of the girls from five to nineteen were 
attending school (these figures show the progress made in 
recent years) : provincial figures were far behind these. 
In the province of Gerga, in Upper Egypt, there were 
89 per cent, of illiterates among the men and 99 per 
cent, among the women ; only 17 per cent, of the boys 
and 4 per cent, of the girls between five and nineteen 
years of age were attending school. Only in recent years, 



104 CHANGING MAN 

with the growth of nationalism and the secularization of 
the educational programme, has the struggle against 
ignorance been taken up with energy by the national 
governments. In the few years of at least formal 
independence there has been a rapid advance in education 
in Egypt : 







Number of 






School year. 


Number of 

o/*J) /i/i/o 


children 


Boys. 


Girls. 






attending. I 




1921-22 


6,175 


454,755 i 383,580 


71,175 


1924-25 


7,240 


570,423 


479,420 


91,003 


1927-28 


8,205 


772,888 


619,622 


153,266 



(These statistics include only the Egyptian schools, not 
the many foreign schools in the country.) The expen- 
diture on education since the declaration of independence 
has steadily increased : 

Expendititre (E*), 



Year. 


Ministry of 
Education. 


Provincial 
Councils. 


Mohammedan 
Theological 
Colleges. 


1921-22 
1925-26 
1929-30 


1,209,653 
2,091,664 
3,163,038 


703,324 
1,082,852 
1,158,317 


189,937 
198,057 
321,033 



Special attention has-been given to the development 
of secondary schools and to the creation of as com- 
prehensive a system as possible of elementary and 
advanced technical and industrial training* This is 
connected with the efforts to assist the Egyptians in the 
modernizing of their industry and in making it indepen- 
dent* In Turkey, Iran, and Iraq the independent 
national governments have attached the same primary 
importance as has Egypt to the development of popular 



IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT 105 

education and the economic training of the people. In 
the .first year of Iraqi independence seventy new 
elementary schools were opened, and fifty in the second, 
and the teaching has been modernized. In contrast 
with this, the British administration in Palestine has 
scarcely any serious progress to show in this field in ten 
years. In 1922 there were 303 government schools in 
Palestine, with 17,966 children attending; in 1932 
there were still 303 schools, though the number of children 
attending had grown to 24,153. The government itself 
admits that, in spite of the excellent financial progress 
of the country, about half of the Arab children applying 
for admission to school in the towns and villages have 
had to be turned away. No attention has been paid to 
the wishes of the population, and the mandatory govern- 
ment itself has to admit in its report for 1932 that 
" Government was actually charged with a deliberate 
policy of keeping the Arab population in a state of 
illiteracy and ignorance." There is only one complete 
government secondary school for boys, and not a single 
secondary school class for girls. Only in 1934 was 
provision made for the opening of the first school giving 
craft or industrial training to the Arab youth. 

In Turkey the introduction of compulsory school 
attendance meets with the same difficulties as in other 
backward countries : lack of teachers, of suitable school 
books, and of financial means to enable the necessary 
reforms to be carried out at the desired rate. Yet in 
1928-29 there were already 6,836 elementary schools in 
Turkey with 484,748 pupils and 155 secondary schools 
with 31,484 pupils. Many of the secondary schools were 
craft or occupational special schools. In the elementary 
schools co-education is general, and in the secondary 
schools it is frequently to be found. In 1928 there were 
also 2,683 continuation schools for adults, with 59,314 
students. As long ago as 1927 one of the best-informed 
writers on Anatolia, Richard Hartmann, wrote : " Even 
in remote country villages, far from a railway, the most 
serious efforts are being made to carry the (educational) 



106 CHANGING MAN 

programme into execution. Model schools are first set 
up in the centres of the various districts, schools which 
really have no need to fear comparison with Western 
schools. The standard of the teachers at these model 
schools, to whose training the state devotes special care, 
is quite excellent. The schools are often run also as 
boarding schools a measure of the utmost importance 
so long as it is not possible to erect in every village a school 
adequate to modern requirements. It seems to be 
characteristic of the new Turkey that attention is con- 
centrated on the hitherto neglected field of elementary 
education, especially girls 5 education, which in the past 
had scarcely even a nominal existence. It is not less 
significant that the educational authorities are at work 
in the remotest districts, which are those most in need," 

It was determined to facilitate the struggle against 
illiteracy by the introduction of the Latin alphabet. 
On June 26th, 1928, a committee was set up in Ankara 
to examine the possibility of the use of the Latin letters ; 
on November 3rd Latin type and script were introduced 
by law ; on and after December 1st all street signs, 
placards, and newspapers had to be in Latin type ; from 
January 1st, 1929, all books had to be printed in the new 
type and public offices and all businesses were to make 
exclusive use of the new writing ; on and after June 1st, 
1929, the authorities were only to accept correspondence 
written in Latin letters. The nation was turned into a 
school, and in this national school all the men and women 
in Turkey between sixteen and forty-five years of age 
were set to learn to read and write. The " head 
teacher " was Mustapha KemaL The great number of 
illiterates made it easier to turn over to Latin writing. 

The secularization and nationalization of education 
raised another important problem in the Levant the 
placing of all education under the control of the state* 
Owing to the entirely inadequate provision made by the 
state in the field of education, foreign institutions, mostly 
Christian missions, had played a great and important 
part. In many directions they did a great deal of good. 



IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT 107 

Such schools as Robert College, near Constantinople, and 
the American University in Beirut did pioneer work in 
bringing new ideas of science, the training of character, 
initiative and democracy, to the Near East. In countries 
like Palestine and Syria, where to this day the govern- 
ment does little or nothing to meet the educational needs 
of the population, the foreign educational institutions 
continue to play an important part. But this can only be 
a transition stage. The modernization of the idea of the 
state and the growth of national solidarity in the countries 
of the Near East demand the subjection of the foreign 
educational institutions to state control and the shaping 
of the educational system in accordance with the national 
spirit. In this respect also the Turkish and Iranian 
governments have been able to go farther than the other 
states. Foreign schools in Turkey have been placed 
under strict government supervision, teaching through 
the medium of the Turkish language has been made 
obligatory, and history, geography, and the Turkish 
language have to be taught by Turkish teachers. In 
March 1931, the Great National Assembly passed a law 
requiring all Turkish boys and girls to be given elementary 
education in Turkish schools ; all mission activity is 
strictly prohibited. 

The strengthening and modernization of the national 
state has made a clean sweep of many obsolete and 
harmful institutions which had hampered the economic 
and cultural developments of the country. The capitula- 
tions in the countries of the Near East had withdrawn the 
foreigners, in whose hands the economic power lay, from 
the juridical and financial sovereignty of the state. These 
states had been required, in the interest of European 
trade, to maintain in force low and undifferentiated 
customs tariffs, which prevented the growth of a native 
industry and the modernizing of industry and trade. 
The Turks were enabled by their victory over the Greeks 
to shake off the capitulations and the tariff treaties (Persia 
followed their example in 1928), From then on it at last 
became possible for Turkish trade and industry to make 



108 CHANGING MAN 

progress. The obsolete tithe system, which had weighed 
very heavily on agriculture, was repealed in 1925, and in 
the following year a new income tax law was decreed. 
Egypt also has won fiscal sovereignty in recent years, but 
the system of capitulations continues in full force in that 
country, and makes impossible any modernization of the 
taxation system. 

Those of the countries of the Near East which are now 
independent, and the native population of which is thus 
no longer prevented from making rapid progress by a 
foreign administration of the colonizing type, are under- 
going complete economic and social transformation. The 
changes that have taken place in the past ten years in the 
constitutional, juridical, and cultural fields, are finding 
their necessary completion in the economic field. Into 
that field also a new spirit has entered. The countries 
of the Levant are thinly-settled agricultural regions with 
a very poor and primitive population and with ill- 
developed communications. Now that they have set up 
a modern system of administration, they are beginning 
to modernize their economic system and to bring it 
technically up to date. Agriculture has largely worked 
to this day by methods thousands of years old ; they 
have to provide it with adequate capital and the necessary 
direction in order to intensify it and to enable it to produce 
bigger and better crops. They have to provide a national 
industry, itself working up the natural resources of the 
country and gradually making it, with its growing require- 
ments of industrial goods, more independent of imports 
from abroad. 

This difficult transition from a semi-feudal and 
primitive agricultural system and from urban trade of 
the early capitalist type (such capital as exists in these 
countries is almost entirely trading capital) to modern 
capitalism and industrialization, is only possible, much 
as in the mercantile period of continental Europe, with 
state assistance. These states, which hitherto were 
only passively involved in the modern world economic 
system, and whose financial institutions were almost 



IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT 109 

exclusively foreign companies, are now beginning to 
prepare their indigenous resources, with the help of the 
state,f or active participation in the modern world economic 
system. They are beginning to set up national financial 
institutions, to work against the alienation and vassalage 
of their economic life, and so to turn their political 
independence to practical account. Turkey has advanced 
farthest along this road ; Iran and Egypt are following 
her example ; and Iraq also is following suit. The same 
lines are being followed wherever independent national 
governments are at the head of the country, entrusted 
with the task of training their peoples and developing 
their country's trade and industry. 

In those countries, on the other hand, in which the 
administration is in foreign hands, the governments are 
either neglecting the task of modernizing indigenous 
social and economic life or are embarking on it only with 
reluctance and hesitation. The lack of active encourage- 
ment often results in this case in no development at all of 
indigenous trade and industry. For at the social level at 
which these countries are existing the necessary economic 
and instructional resources, capital, gift of organization, 
and initiative, are in the hands of the state alone, and the 
modernization of trade and industry is only possible with 
state aid, through the provision of national financial 
institutions, through subsidies to native industries and 
the provision of small credit for artisans and craftsmen, 
through organization on a grand scale of agricultural 
credit, of co-operation, and of technical training. 

The transition to a new social level, the necessity for 
gradual formation of capital, the indispensable pre- 
condition of educating and training a newgeneration,have 
the result that the transition period is one in which the 
native trade and industry are greatly weakened. The 
newly strengthened nationalism of the indigenous 
governments regards it as essential to protect the 
indigenous trade and industry from irreparable alienation 
and agriculture from the sale of potentially rich and 
fertile lands, and to grant concessions and monopolies 



110 CHANGING MAN 

only in the general interest of the whole population. Here 
again Turkey has led the way. The rigorous nature of 
the steps she has taken can only be understood when all 
the danger of alienation, such as took place in the Otto- 
man empire, is borne in mind. Under the Turkish 
laws coastal shipping is reserved exclusively to Turkish 
vessels, Turkish is the exclusive language of business, 
there is a whole series of occupations which foreigners 
may not carry on in Turkey, and they are forbidden to 
acquire agricultural land. Similarly in Japan the great 
danger of being bought up, of the alienation of the 
bitterly impoverished country in the critical period of 
the transition from a barter to a money basis has been 
avoided by laws and protective governmental decrees. 

The defensive measures of the new nationalism in the 
economic field often take rigorous and regrettable forms, 
but it should not be forgotten that in this respect Europe 
was the teacher of the Near East, and that it is only under 
the influence of bitter experience that the Orient has given 
up its past passivity and adopted the new language which 
is astonishing and sometimes shocking the West. The 
old laissez-faire has given way to a new passion for 
independence, a desire for self-respect and self-assertion. 
This, no doubt, is unpleasant for the West with its 
ambition for predominance and economic expansion in 
the Levant. In the states that have won their indepen- 
dence the European is no longer able to count on the 
privileged treatment and the submissiveness he found 
everywhere no more than twenty years ago. But it is 
from the West that the Orient has learnt its new deter- 
mination to " keep its end up " : it is now at work 
liberating itself from the domination of the West with the 
means of the West. I 

In all these countries the national industry is being 
encouraged by exhibitions and by efforts to train tha 
masses in the accumulation of capital and in the purchase 
of home products. In April 1929, there was a demon- ; 
stration in Stamboul University in favour of the use ot] 
national' industrial products; exhibitions in Stamboulll 



IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT 111 

and Ankara followed. At the beginning of the Moham- 
medan fast month in January 1930, electric signs were 
placed on all the mosques of Stamboul with the inscrip- 
tions "Waste is Sin " and "Buy Native Goods", At 
the end of 1929 an Association for National Trade and 
Saving was formed at Ankara, under the chairmanship 
of the president of the Great National Assembly. At 
the end of 1930 the first " National Savings Week " was 
organized under his direction. Its appeal contained this 
sentence : " Citizens ! In the past it was regarded as 
dishonouring to make use of native products, but in the 
past it was also regarded as dishonouring to call the 
Turks Turks." So the spirit of the new nationalism, the 
new self-confidence, the new treasuring of the past and of 
the nation's individuality is penetrating every sphere of 
public and business life at the very moment of European- 
ization and under its influence. 

Advance to an international civilization and pride in 
the nation's long history, in the historical or mythical 
roots of the nation's character, go hand in hand as in 
Europe's age of nationalism. The new programme of 
the Republican People's Party of 1931 contains the 
sentence: "The fatherland is the region within our 
present political frontiers, within which the Turkish 
nation lives with its long and glorious history and with 
the imprints which have sunk deeply into the soil." 
According to the official theory of the Turkey of to-day, 
the Turks didnot migrate into Anatolia some nine centuries 
ago, but are identical with the peoples which inhabited 
Anatolia in ancient times, especially the Hittites. Thus 
Anatolia is their historic and original home, and the old 
civilizations of Asia Minor axe their own. As many 
Teutons have traced back the whole history of human 
civilization to the migrations and the influence of Nordic 
Teutons, and have regarded the Teuton North as the 
cradle of all civilizations, so a Turkish author, Yussuf 
Ziya, in his book Arietr und Turanier, published in German 
in 1932, comes after a comprehensive linguistic, ethno- 
logical, and mythological inquiry to the conclusion that 



112 CHANGING MAN 

the so-called Indo-Germanic and also the Semitic peoples 
must be traced back to an original Turkish race, and that 
they migrated from the original seat of the Turkish race 
in Central Asia. " If the civilization of the whole world 
is the work of Turanian peoples, the c Aryan ' peoples 
also have their full share of the glory, for they too belong 
by descent and speech to the Turanians : the stem ar is 
a Turkish stem. . . . (The) civilization which 
originated in Siberia and spread over all Asia and Europe 
is the common work of all the Turanians. This explains 
the almost simultaneous appearance of the same civiliza- 
tion in China, India, Babylonia, Egypt, and the 
Mediterranean basin. And the language of the human 
groups, like their civilization, has also grown up, even in 
the farthest corners of the world, out of the same basis 
the Turkish language." 

So Turkish nationalism is providing itself with its 
own national and racial myths, just as European 
nationalism has done ; its own past is given a legendary 
interpretation and extension, and so the Turks, in entering 
into the universal civilization, consider that they axe 
entering only into a portion of their own heritage. They 
are not being absorbed in this civilization, but retain 
their historic national personality. In the programme 
already mentioned of the Republican People's Party 
there is also this passage : " Although the Party desires 
to advance along the path of progress and development 
and in international relations and rapprochements at the 
same pace as all nations of the present day, it desires in 
principle to preserve the character of Turkish society and 
its essentially independent personality." 

The development of the national personality, the 
training of the people in the spirit of the new Turkey, was 
served by the Turk Odjagi, an organization founded in 
1912 " to renew the national life through the youth of 
both sexes on the basis of a new national culture on the 
pattern of the ideas of Western civilization ". At first 
the association pursued pan-Turanian aims, carrying on 
Turkish cultural propaganda also among the Turks outside 



IN A CHANGING ENVIRONMENT 113 

Turkey. With the victory of Mustapha Kemal it came over 
entirely to his programme of reform confined to Turkey, and 
in 1931 it amalgamated with the Republican People's 
Party. This party founded in February 1932 a new society, 
the " People's House ", to carry on the educational work 
the Turk Odjagi had done. In all the Turkish towns this 
house was to become the centre of the whole work of 
popular education and to carry on Europeanization and 
national development concurrently. The " People's 
Houses ", in which alcoholic drinks and card games are 
forbidden, are to have departments for language and 
literature, the fine arts, the theatre, sport, social aid, and 
work on the land ; popular education courses, libraries, 
museums, and exhibitions. Such educational centres 
can do more even than legislation in exercising a profound 
influence on the transformation of the new generation and 
of the life of the people. 

The new age is revealing itself also in personal life, in 
a new way of thinking and feeling, in the changed status 
of women, in their entry into social and public activities, 
and in the ending of the old seclusion of the family. In 
recent years women's emancipation has made great 
progress in all the countries of the Near East, but it has 
been fully carried out only in Turkey, which here again is 
in the van of progress. Women have full access to Stam- 
boul University, including its Medical Faculty ; the 
woman is the man's comrade in student and professional 
life. There is still a difference in the status of women 
in the big towns and the countryside, but women have 
appeared everywhere as officials and teachers. In 1930 
the women of Turkey received the municipal franchise 
and the first woman publicly exercised the office of judge. 
At the end of 1934 the Turkish Republic granted Turkish 
women the vote for the Great National Assembly, and 
also made them eligible as members. The first elections 
under this new regulation, on February 8th, 1935, brought 
seventeen women members into the Turkish Parliament, 
out of a total of 399. Most of these were professional 
women, but one was a peasant ; she was at the same time 



114 CHANGING MAN 

mayor or head of her village. These women members 
participated in the International Women's Congress held 
in Istanbul in April 1935, in the former imperial palace 
of Yildiz. The Congress was able to record with satis- 
faction the complete emancipation of Turkish women. 
In the legal, political, and economic fields, women in 
Turkey have become the equals of men. 

The relationship between the sexes is beginning to 
change entirely through the new manners, through 
co-education, and through association in society and in 
sport. A youth movement has come into existence and 
has brought sport and games, rambling and the love of 
Nature, as new elements into Oriental life. Perhaps 
to-day the differences between the generations are more 
marked in the East than anywhere else in the world. 
There is no longer any stopping the association of the East 
in the general trend of world civilization and world trade. 
The new means of transport and the incorporation of the 
Near East in the world system of communications will 
further accelerate the process. 



INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS OF 
WORLD COMMUNICATIONS 

IN regions dotted with inhabited oases, where the human 
groups are separated from one another by wide desert 
areas, uncultivable steppes, or barren and precipitous 
mountains, the improvement of communications is the 
first condition of modern state administration and of an 
intensification of trade* Civilized men can overcome 
the natural difficulties of their environment in regard to 
communications, but not until they have done so does 
it become possible for them to live at a higher level of 
civilization. Friedrich Ratzel rightly says : " Modern 
communications are a symptom of civilization and 
promote civilization." The Ottoman empire and Persia, 
both states of wide territorial extent, suffered severely 
until the present century from the lack of a developed 
system of communications. The various parts of the 
country were widely separated from one another, the 
central power was inevitably weakened, all reform was 
impossible, and the exchange of goods was faced with 
cttfficulties. The regions at a distance from the 
Mediterranean were cut off from the world even in the 
nineteenth century, remote from all the great trade 
routes, and could not be opened up to trade and civiliza- 
tion, with the increase of population they bring. The 
mountain passes were impassable for months in winter, 
the deserts and steppes accessible only to the cameL 
The only means of rapid transport then known was the 
railway. In the United States, in Siberia, and in other 
regions, the railways had promoted territorial unification 
and the development of economic relations to an extent 
undreamed of before their coming. They had become 
the means of the penetration of civilization. 

But the building of railways was an extraordinarily 
expensive undertaking. If they were laid through 



116 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

sparsely inhabited regions the return on the expenditure 
was doubtful, at least for the first years. The Ottoman 
empire and Persia were only able to raise the necessary 
sums for railway construction under burdensome financial 
and political conditions. The granting of loans to the 
states of the Near East (whose situation in this respect 
was similar to that of the states of South America) was 
one of the most usual means of gaining influence over 
their financial, economic and political affairs, and of 
making ruthless use of this influence to increase the 
political and economic power of the lending state. Rail- 
way concessions in Turkey, as in China, proved to be the 
principal levers for political control. Friedrich List had 
declared years before that " those who own a country's 
means of communication control the country ". 

The pressure of the Powers on the Constantinople 
government induced it, regardless of all objections, to 
grant railway concessions under which the Turkish state 
actually guaranteed a definite revenue on working per 
kilometre, so that it would have paid the railway com- 
panies best to run no trains at all, since their revenues 
were assured to them in any case. In the eastern part 
of Asia Minor the Russian government claimed the 
mpnopoly of railway construction, and refused to allow 
Turkey to build railways herself or to give contracts for 
railway construction to any other than Russian companies. 
It was not surprising that Russia took no steps to build 
railways connecting the east of Anatolia, which she hoped 
soon to conquer, with the main centres in Turkey, when 
such railways would have given the country strategic 
security and have strengthened its trade and industry ; 
the Turkish government thus had to leave the eastern 
regions of its country without any connection with the 
Bosphorus. The Turkish government built only one 
railway, the Hedjaz railway, out of its own resources ; 
this was also the only railway which directly served 
Turkish interests. 

But in addition to the problem of internal com- 
munications, the Oriental states were faced by a second 



OF WORLD COMMUNICATIONS 117 

problem, that of their connection with the outer world. 
Regarded from a general point of view, this problem 
was of even greater importance. Its solution could 
undoubtedly be, at least indirectly, of advantage to those 
Oriental territories which were affected by it ; but at 
the same time it drew them into a field of tension in 
world politics which held grave dangers for their indepen- 
dence and progress. With the coming of the industrial 
epoch and the rapid growth of population Western Europe 
required constantly increasing quantities of raw materials 
and constantly extended markets for the sale of its pro- 
ducts. Atlantic trade was no longer enough ; the 
tendencies to universal world trade steadily grew in 
strength. Ways and means had to be sought of con- 
necting the raw material countries and markets in 
southern Asia and in the Far East with Europe as 
rapidly and securely as possible. The world trade 
routes of ancient and medieval times through the Levant 
offered themselves as means of reducing distances in 
comparison with the sea route round the southern point 
of -Africa. The Levant was to be enabled to recover its 
old importance as a country of transit between the 
Mediterranean and the Indian Ocean. With the growth 
of capitalism, and its entry into the epoch of imperialism, 
world trade made successful efforts " to open up the 
intermediate countries between the principal regions of 
civilization and intercommunication, using all the means 
of transport, and finally to conquer the whole world. 
Similarly it tries to bring more and more articles of trade 
within its sphere and to control continually increasing 
quantities of goods, men, and news." (Kurt Hassert.) 
The number of people involved in world trade, the 
quantity of goods required, the quality of the means of 
transport, and therewith the possibilities of overcoming 
space and time, grew incredibly. Concurrently, however, 
there grew the importance of communications in world 
politics. The control of the great trade routes became 
one of the central problems over which the Powers 
wrestled with one another. Only by safeguarding the 



118 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

functioning of the transport and news services could the 
world empires as they expanded be effectively cemented. 
The struggle broke out between the European Powers 
over the construction and safeguarding of these routes. 
The penetration and conquest of the Oriental countries 
followed the course of the routes and helped to safeguard 
them. Steamship and railway were the means of 
transport of the nineteenth century ; French enterprise 
built the Suez Canal and German the Baghdad Railway. 
Germany had come late into the struggle for world power 
and world influence, and her geographical situation as 
well as the coming trend in world politics made her 
natural line of penetration that of the south-east, Berlin- 
Belgrade-Byzantium-Baghdad (-Bombay). But neither 
of these great routes, neither the Suez Canal nor the 
Baghdad Railway, remained within the control of the 
states whose subjects had dreamed them and made them 
realities : both were taken over by Great Britain and 
fitted into her imperial network of communications. 

In recent years motor car and aeroplane have been 
added to steamship and railway. They have revolution- 
ized the problem of communications for the very countries 
in which communications were difficult and population 
sparse. Just as railway construction in the countries 
of the Levant had served trade only secondarily, and 
primarily policy the assurance of world domination 
so the institution of the air lines has served world policy 
and trans-continental domination. The struggles which 
broke out over the development and guarding of sea and 
land routes are beginning to reappear in connection with 
air routes. Aeroplane and motor car have altered the 
aspect of space and time in wide territories which until 
now had known no change for thousands of years, and 
have brought changes in the importance of various 
localities in their relation to the principal lines of world 
communication. Through their situation in regard to 
the main air lines, various towns and countries have 
gained an " unearned increment " ; the new means of 
transport have awakened them out of an enchanted 



OF WORLD COMMUNICATIONS 119 

sleep of many centuries ; and the new lines of com- 
munication, following geographical laws, have brought 
new life into immemorial trade routes. But whatever 
may be their importance in the future, none of the later 
routes approaches in importance the cutting of the 
Isthmus of Suez. 

THE SUEZ CANAL 

The Isthmus of Suez unites two continents, Asia and 
AMca. It is the most important link in the Old World. 
Before long it will be crossed by the great direct land 
route from Europe through Asia Minor to Cairo and 
thence through eastern Africa to Cape Town. But the 
Isthmus of Suez also divides two seas, the Mediterranean 
and the Red Sea. It thus blocked the shortest sea 
route from Europe to the wealth of southern Asia and the 
Far East. Here the old Egyptian kings tried to cut a 
canal ; Darius, King of the Persians, was the first ruler 
to succeed. Later Roman and Arab rulers restored 
the canal after periods of neglect and silting up ; in the 
eighteenth century it finally became unusable. 

The purpose of these canals was to link up the Nile 
with the Red Sea, not to provide a direct route from the 
Mediterranean into the Red Sea. The possibility of this 
was first investigated by engineers of Napoleon's Egyptian 
expedition. Napoleon's breadth of vision, embracing 
the future of countries and continents in a measure 
unique among the statesmen of his epoch, recognized the 
importance of Egypt and of the Suez Canal ; but he had 
not time to devote himself to the execution of the project. 
It was taken up by another Erenchman, Ferdinand de 
Lesseps. Lesseps had been consular agent for his 
country in Egypt from 1831 to 1838 ; he had made 
himself familiar with the terrain, and by 1852 he had 
worked out his project. On November 30th, 1854, the 
Egyptian viceroy, Mohammed Said Pasha (in whose 
honour the port of entry of the Suez Canal is called Port 
Said) signed the concession which conveyed the right of 



120 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

property in the Canal for ninety-nine years after its 
opening that is, until November, 1968 to the Com- 
pagnie Universelle du Canal Maritime de Suez. On the 
expiry of the concession the Canal becomes the property 
of Egypt. In 1910 the company tried to get an extension 
of the concession for forty years, but in spite of British 
pressure the Egyptians rejected its proposals. 

The company is constituted as a French joint stock 
company with its headquarters in Paris. Its share 
capital of 200,000,000 francs, divided into 400,000 shares, 
carries 5 per cent, fixed interest, together with 71 per 
cent, of the net profit as dividend. Originally the 
greater part of the shares was acquired by France ; they 
had been offered internationally for subscription, but 
England, Germany, Austria, and Russia took up no 
shares. The British saw in the cutting of the Canal a 
continuation of the Napoleonic policy and a French 
threat to the sea route to India, and looked unfavourably 
on the scheme ; the Viceroy of Egypt had to take up the 
176,602 unallotted shares. They brought no benefit to 
Egypt, and did not long remain in the Viceroy's possession. 
He was constantly in financial difficulties, and in the end 
was forced to sell. Beaconsfield, whose gaze was fixed 
on the Empire in the East, seized the opportunity. In 
1875 the shares were acquired by England. The price 
was high, but the deal proved extraordinarily profitable, 
and gave Britain decisive influence over this water route, 
so vital to her, which originally was constructed in spite 
of her protest. 

The construction of the Canal was begun on April 15th, 
1859. Ten years later, on November 15th, 1869, it was 
formally opened. Enormous technical difficulties had 
had to be overcome in this desert area, where everything 
required had had to be brought at great expense, and 
where water shortage and epidemics had continually 
menaced the progress of the work. The Canal runs with- 
out locks through its whole length of 168 kilometres. 
It has a depth at present of 12 metres along a channel at 
least 45 metres in breadth ; the surface breadth is between 



OF WORLD COMMUNICATIONS 121 

100 and 135 metres. With the aid of electric lighting and 
signalling plant it is possible for ships to pass through the 
Canal by night as well as by day. The average time 
taken in passing through is thirteen hours, speed being 
reduced to 10 kilometres an hour in the actual Canal 
channel, apart from the salt lakes. 

There are three towns by the side of the Canal. Port 
Said, at its Mediterranean entrance, is the third largest 
city in Egypt, with over 100,000 inhabitants, and is one 
of the greatest coal and oil bunkering stations in the 
world. Ismailia, named after the Viceroy Ismail, is a 
pleasant garden city with 25,000 inhabitants, and is the 
seat of the administration of the Canal. Suez, with 
40,000 inhabitants, is the old northern port of the Bed 
Sea. Port Said is connected via Ismailia with Cairo by 
railway, and Ismailia is similarly connected with Suez. 
Between Ismailia and Port Said lies Kantara, where the 
immemorial caravan route leads from the Nile valley 
to Syria. During the world war the railway from 
Kantara to Haifa was buUt, but it has no direct con- 
nection with the Egyptian railway system. The Suez 
Canal is crossed by ferries ; a project has been under 
consideration for the construction of a tunnel under it. 
In recent years a new port and entrepot, named Port 
Fuad, after King Fuad, has sprung up opposite Port Said, 
on the other bank of the Canal ; it is intended to be the 
point of departure of the railway to Palestine and of a 
railway through the Sinai peninsula to Akaba. 

The cost of construction of the Canal amounted to 
472,000,000 francs, but the constant danger of silting and 
of collapse of the banks demands continual heavy expen- 
diture. Nevertheless, the company has earned steadily 
increasing surpluses since 1872, and the value of the shares 
has risen to many times the nominal value. The transit 
dues were fixed in 1884 at ten francs per registered ton, 
7-5 francs for ships in ballast. In the following years, 
as the use of the Canal increased, these dues were steadily 
reduced, ships in ballast always enjoying the reduction of 
2-5 francs per registered ton. The dues are now 7s. 6d. 



122 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

per registered ton, in English, money, and 3s. 9d. for ships 
in ballast. The canal dues for passengers have remained 
unaltered at ten gold francs, with a reduction for children. 
The total revenue of the company amounted in 1928 to 
1,167,112,000 francs, and the net profit to 713,146,000 
francs. In 1934 the corresponding figures were 860,760,000 
and 546,750,000. Of the net profit 71 per cent, is dis- 
tributed to shareholders, 15 per cent, to the Credit Foncier 
de France, 10 per cent, to the foundation shareholders, 
and 2 per cent, each to the board of directors and the staff. 
The Egyptian government ceded its 15 per cent, to the 
Credit Foncier in 1880, so that Egypt gains no financial 
advantage at present from the Canal. The nominal 
value of the shares was halved and their number doubled 
in 1924. In 1928 the dividend amounted to 510 francs 
per share, and in 1934 to 525 francs. 

THE IMPOBTANOB OF THE SUEZ CANAL 

No other artificial waterway approaches the Suez 
Canal in importance to world trade and world com- 
munications. It made the greatest revolution in transit 
by sea since the discovery of the sea routes to America 
and India. It helped the steamship to its final victory 
over the sailing ship. In the Bed Sea with its frequent 
calms the sailing ship was at a hopeless disadvantage, 
while on the long route round the west coast of Africa, 
with its few harbours, the steamship had proved less 
serviceable. Before the cutting of the Canal the route 
from Europe to India, Australia, and the Far East had led 
round Africa. This route was almost entirely under 
British control. The few coaling stations were in British 
possessions. The route was mainly used, however, by 
sailing ships, as the large quantity of bunker space for coal 
reduced the cargo capacity. It was the Suez Canal that 
brought the supremacy of the steamship on the East 
India passage. 

Great Britain proceeded at once to safeguard this sea 
route. In 1839, to make sure of the future, she occupied 



OF WORLD COMMUNICATIONS 123 

Aden, at the south-western extremity of Arabia ; the 
possession was extended by the acquisition of adjacent 
territory in 1869. This small rocky peninsula is entirely 
barren and waterless, but it dominates the route to India 
and East Africa as a fortress, cable station, and fuelling 
station of the first order. Further acquisitions sub- 
stantially added to this safeguard. In 1857, when the 
construction of the Suez Canal had been begun and the 
risks of the Suez route to India had become real, the small 
island of Perim, in the Bab el Mandeb, the narrow entrance 
to the Red Sea, was occupied and fortified. Once before, 
at the time of the French occupation of Egypt, the 
British had sent troops to the island as a precaution, from 
1799 to 1801. Perim commands the actual Red Sea 
route. The adjacent strips of Arabian territory, the 
protectorates of Aden and Hadramaut, are under British 
supervision. Of more importance are the Kuria Muria 
Islands, off the southern coast of Arabia, and the Socotra 
Islands, off the African coast ; they were acquired by 
Great Britain in 1854 and 1886 respectively. The 
Socotra Islands, the " Fortunate Islands " of the ancients, 
had been a meeting place for Indian and Greek traders, 
and were fortified in 1507 by Tristan da Cunha, the 
Portuguese navigator, to serve as a base for the trade 
with India. To-day the Socotra Islands are depen- 
dencies of an Arabian sultan of the Hadramaut coast, 
who, with the other sultans of the southern shores of 
Arabia, came under British protection in 1888. In the 
Red Sea itself Great Britain has possessed a quarantine 
station on the island of Kamaran since 1827 ; she has 
beacons on three small islands, and during the world 
war she occupied two uninhabited islands of considerable 
size. So, in a consistently pursued policy which was 
completed by the occupation of Egypt and the Soudan, 
the Sinai peninsula, and Palestine, the Red Sea was made 
a British sea. The aim Napoleon's far-sightedness had 
sought was attained by Britain. 

The Suez Canal may be regarded as a British water- 
way, not only because the number of vessels sailing under 



124 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

the British flag is greater than that of all other vessels 
taken together, but also because the bulk of the goods 
supplied to the East and the raw materials coming from 
the East are consigned from or to England. It was the 
Suez Canal that brought the British possessions in India 
into the main stream of world trade, and this applies 
also, in rather less degree, to the territories lying farther 
east. It was only after the completion of the Canal, with 
the consequent shortening of the period of transit, that 
it became possible for many of the products of these 
countries to be brought to Europe without risk of spotting. 

The volume of goods coining through the Suez Canal 
from the East is nearly double that of the eastward 
bound goods. Of the countries of origin and consign- 
ment east of the Canal, British India and Ceylon still 
take first place, followed by the Far East and, at a con- 
siderable distance, by the Malay peninsula with the Sunda 
Islands, the Persian Gulf region, and Australia with New 
Zealand. Next, again at a distance, come East Africa 
and, finally, French Indo-China and Siam. The economic 
relation between East and West is reflected once more 
in the Suez Canal traffic : the West sends mainly industrial 
manufactures, textiles, machinery, and ironware ; the 
East raw materials oil-seed, petroleum, rice, wheat, 
ores, and textile raw materials. 

For Egypt the Suez Canal has had little economic 
importance ; politically it has been a heavy burden on 
the country. On the other hand, the Canal has been of 
great importance to the European Mediterranean ports, 
Marseilles, Genoa, and Trieste. The shifting of the centre 
of gravity of trade after the discovery of the ocean routes 
had seemed to relegate the Mediterranean to the state of 
an inland sea, until the Suez Canal turned it into an 
important channel for trade with the East. The change 
restored the importance of the old ports in comparison 
with the Atlantic ports, and the Italian coastal towns and 
Phoenician Marseilles awoke to new life. The passage 
from London to Bombay via Suez is 4,881 nautical miles 
shorter than the passage round the Cape ; the saving for 



OF WORLD COMMUNICATIONS 125 

Hamburg is much the same. The saving for Marseilles 
is 6,280 miles and for Trieste 7,404. The greatest saving 
effected by the cutting of the Canal is on the passage to 
India ; the saving to the Far East is rather less, but still 
very considerable ; the saving between London and 
Australia is only slight. To escape the high Canal-dues 
many cargo boats still use the longer route round the Cape. 

From 1870, when 486 vessels passed through, until 
1913, the number and tonnage of vessels using the Canal 
continually increased. The 1913 figure was 5,085 vessels, 
with a registered tonnage of 20,033,884. During the wax 
and the years immediately following it the figures fell, 
but they soon recovered, and the 1929 figure was 6,274 
vessels with a tonnage of 33,466,000. In 1930, with the 
effects of the world crisis beginning to show themselves, 
there was a slight weakening to 5,761 vessels totalling 
31,668,759 tons, and in 1931 a further weakening to 
5,366 and 30,028,119. The 1934 figures were 5,663 
vessels and 31,751,000 tons. The number of passengers 
was 325,855 in 1929, 305,202 in 1930, and 262,122 in 
1934. 

Great Britain has an enormous lead in the Canal 
traffic. In 1930, 3,125 vessels, out of the total of 5,761, 
were under the British flag. The dominant position of 
Great Britain is shown equally plainly by the tonnage 
figures : 





Total registered tonnage of vessek 
passing through the Suez Canal. 
(OOO'a omitted.) 


Tonnage of British 
vessels. 
(OOO's omitted.) 


1930 
1933 
1934 


31,668 
30,677 
31,751 


17,600 
16,733 
17,238 



Germany came next in the years before the world war, 
though at a great distance. After the war Germany 
began to recover her position. In 1923 she took fourth 
place in number of vessels and in tonnage, following Great 
Britain, Holland, and France ; in 1927 she came third, 



126 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

close behind Holland, and in 1930 she was again in the 
second place as before the war, with 600 vessels aggregat- 
ing 3,338,842 registered tons. Then followed Holland, 
France, Italy, Norway, Japan, and the United States. 
Austria-Hungary, which came fifth before the war, has 
disappeared ; Russia, which before the war was seventh, 
now shows only an inconsiderable figure. 

The overwhelming importance of the Suez Canal 
seemed to be challenged for the first time when the 
Baghdad Railway, planned by Germany, showed the 
possibility of reviving the immemorial land route to 
India. The outcome of the world war, in the course 
of which the Suez Canal was threatened by Turkish and 
German troops, fulfilled the British desires for the safe- 
guarding of the Canal and the removal of the threat to it 
from the Baghdad Railway. At the same time the land 
and air route through Asia Minor to India has begun to 
gain importance. This land route will enter into com- 
petition with the Suez Canal in the future, but for most 
sorts of freight traffic the Suez Canal will remain of 
primary importance for India, just as it will continue 
to be for the Far East in spite of the Trans-Siberian Rail- 
way and other Eurasian railways to come. 

THE BAGHDAD RAILWAY 

The Suez Canal followed the great route of ancient and 
medieval times which had led from south-east to north- 
west, round the Arabian peninsula and through the Red 
Sea to the Mediterranean. The other route, east of Arabia 
and from the Persian Gulf through Mesopotamia to the 
Mediterranean and Asia Minor, was still awaiting revival. 
As early as the eighteen-f orties Great Britain had made the 
first preparations for opening it up ; with this in view she 
had already countered Napoleon's expedition and 
Mehemet Ali's thrust from Egypt in the direction of 
Syria. In the capable and energetic Mehemet AK Britain 
saw a potential reformer of the Ottoman empire, who 
might lift it out of its lethargy and the chaos of its 



OF WORLD COMMUNICATIONS 127 

provincial administration. That would have reduced the 
chances of a future conquest of Arabia and of the land 
route to India. This land route, whose strategic points 
were the Bay of Acre in the Mediterranean and Basra on 
the Persian Gulf, continually occupied the attention of 
British imperial policy, which during the nineteenth cen- 
tury became more and more definitely a policy of safe- 
guarding the Indian possessions. In the second half of 
the nineteenth century there began the struggle between 
Britain and Turkey for Arabia, which was decided finally 
in the world war. It was waged on the British side at 
first only from the Persian Gulf, the waters nearest to 
India, but later also from the Bed Sea. The German 
plan of securing the concession for a railway line from 
Asia Minor to Baghdad, and on to the Persian Gulf, was 
thus bound to arouse suspicion and meet with resistance 
in England, as it did also, though not to the same extent, 
in Russia and France. Russia herself aimed at extending 
her influence as far as the Persian Gulf, regarding 
Armenia, Kurdistan, and Persia as her sphere of influence, 
and seeing in the new railway line a threat to it. France 
put forward claims on Syria and Cilicia, the Phoenician 
ports, and the Gulf of Alexandretta, with the hinterland 
of Aleppo and Antioch, territories which were largely to 
be served by and opened up through the Baghdad 
Railway. This railway also threatened to contribute to 
the economic and strategical strengthening of Asiatic 
Turkey. Iraq had until then been a neglected part of the 
Turkish empire, situated at an enormous distance from 
Constantinople, and hardly more than nominally subject 
to the Sublime Porte ; British influence had been able to 
penetrate here from the Persian Gulf without hindrance : 
the railway threatened to unite it closely with the central 
points of the Ottoman empire. Finally it would carry 
Abdul Hamid's Pan-Islamic propaganda nearer to India* 
British nervousness about any military strengthening of 
Turkey, particularly along the land route to India, was 
increased by the speeches of Emperor William II, in which 
he represented himself as a friend of Turkey and as the 



128 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

protector of all Mohammedans. These circumstances, 
together with the growing importance of oil supplies, 
made the Baghdad Railway one of the most hotly con- 
tested issues in foreign policy in the years immediately 
preceding the world war. The railway would have been 
able to open up the rich oil region of Mosul, and in the 
south it might have come dangerously close to the British 
oil concessions in Persia. 

As in the case of the Suez Canal, the British govern- 
ment tried at first to make impossible the carrying out of 
the Baghdad Railway project by refusing to provide any 
part of the required capital. Only when the building 
of the railway showed signs of succeeding without British 
aid did Great Britain try to gain effective influence over 
it. Negotiations were carried on in 1913 and 1914, in 
the course of which the Ottoman government compen- 
sated Britain and France by the grant of valuable con- 
cessions in Anatolia and Syria ; the outcome was an 
agreement which took full account of British interests 
in Iraq and in the Persian Gulf. The terminus of the 
railway was not to be Kuweit, which lies actually on the 
Persian Gulf, but Basra, on the Shatt-el-Arab, which was 
more accessible to British influence. This long and 
obstinate struggle seemed to be finally disposed of on 
June 15th, 1914 ; six weeks later the world war broke out 
and decided the fate of the Baghdad Railway, 

At the outbreak of the war the railway had been con- 
structed as far as the Taurus mountains and northwards 
from Baghdad as far as Samarra. During the war the 
Germans and Turks laid down the difficult stretch 
through the Taurus mountains as far as Aleppo, and 
pushed on in the direction of Mosul as far as Nissibin. 
The British connected Baghdad with Basra and built 
a railway north-eastwards to the Persian frontier and as 
far as the oil region of Kirkuk, But the Baghdad 
Railway remains uncompleted to this day ; the section 
from Samarra to Mosul has not been laid. The interest 
in the railway has considerably diminished* The Berlin- 
Byzantium-Baghdad scheme belongs to the past; 



OF WORLD COMMUNICATIONS 129 

Baghdad's relations with Constantinople and Berlin no 
longer exist. With the dissolution of the Ottoman 
empire the railway itself has come into the possession of 
three states and is under three separate administrations. 
The completion of the stretch from Baghdad to Mosul is 
not now to be built via Samaxra as originally planned, 
but via Kirkuk and along the Tigris through the fertile 
parts of Kurdistan. There exists now a "Taurus 
Express ", belonging to the International Sleeping Car 
Company, which runs (in connection with the Orient 
Express from Paris to Constantinople) via Aleppo to 
Baghdad, but the section from Nissibin via Mosul to 
Kirkuk has to be covered by car. Great Britain is not 
interested in a direct connection of Baghdad and the 
Persian Gulf with Turkey ; her efforts are directed toward 
the connection of Baghdad with a British Mediterranean 
port ; it is impossible to-day to build the "all-red railway" 
to India via Constantinople and Aleppo, but the war has 
made possible the realization in coming years of another 
project, that of an all-British railway from the Gulf of 
Acre to Basra, a route which Napoleon in his day wanted 
to conquer. The German Baghdad Railway policy has 
become a British policy, and Berlin-Constantinople- 
Baghdad has become London-Haifa-Baghdad, The 
Iraqi Government's policy, however, is to Imk Baghdad 
and the railway system, which is now in the possession of 
the Kingdom of Iraq, with Iran, Turkey, and the Syrian 
ports, instead of with Haifa, and thus to strengthen the 
nascent alliance of the Near Eastern states. 



THE HEDJAZ BAILWAY 

The Hedjaz Railway, like the Baghdad Railway, was 
intended to strengthen Turkey in her struggle for Arabia. 
The Baghdad Railway encircled Arabia from the north- 
east, the Hedjaz Railway from the north and north- 
west. The two railway systems met at Aleppo, and 
forked there to surround Arabia and join up with 
Constantinople* The Hedjaz Railway was conceived as a 



130 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

pilgrim's railway ; the Mohammedan pilgrims from 
Turkey and other countries were to assemble at Damascus 
and travel thence by railway to Medina and Mecca, 
Abdul Hamid, the great protagonist of Pan-Islamism, 
built this railway as a Mohammedan ecclesiastical founda- 
tion, a waqf. The construction was made possible through 
contributions from pious Mohammedans of all countries 
and through a stamp duty in the Ottoman empire. The 
line was laid, in spite of the great difficulties, entirely with 
Turkish resources, a demonstration that under efficient 
leadership Turkey was able to overcome difficult transport 
problems unaided. 

The railway also helped Turkey to keep her hold on 
the Hedjaz and the Yemen, whither the Turkish govern- 
ment had had formerly to send troops through the Suez 
Canal, which was only nominally under Turkish 
sovereignty. The railway opened up the valuable cereal 
region of Hauran, in eastern Syria, but except for that it 
was only of slight economic importance, since it ran through 
desert country or along the border of the desert, far from 
the Mediterranean and the Red Sea, in order to be out of 
range of naval guns and expeditionary forces under their 
cover. Two important branch lines connected the rail- 
way with the Mediterranean, one from Damascus through 
Lebanon to Beirut and the other from Deraa to Haifa, 
which through the building of this railway soon outgrew 
in importance the more famous Acre, lying on the same 
bay. 

The Hedjaz Railway was begun in 1901, In 1904 
it was completed from Damascus to Maan, where the 
south-west direction parallel to the Mediterranean coast 
turns into a south-east direction parallel to the Red Sea ; 
in 1908 the section from Maan to Medina was completed. 
The Hedjaz Railway also remains unfinished. The 
section from Medina to Mecca and the three important 
branch lines from Maan to Akaba, from Medina to Yanbo, 
and from Mecca to Jidda have not yet been begun, 

Britain saw in the Hedjaz Railway a potential threat 
to her domination of the Red Sea and the Sinai peninsula. 



OF WORLD COMMUNICATIONS 131 

She was concerned above all for the port of Akaba, at the 
north-east end of the Red Sea, which may at some time 
acquire a crucial strategic importance in regard to com- 
munications similar to that of Haifa. During the world 
war a large part of the railway in the Hedjaz itself was 
successfully destroyed; Britain's Arab allies advanced 
along it and conquered Transjordania and Syria. To-day 
the railway has completely lost its strategic value ; the 
line from Constantinople via Damascus to Medina has 
become of no importance. Like the Baghdad Railway, 
the main line of the Hedjaz Railway runs through three 
different states Syria, Trans jordania, and Hedjaz. In 
Syria there is very little traffic ; in Transjordania only a 
couple of trains go every week between Amman and 
Maan, and the section from Maan to Medina is entirely 
out of use, having been in an unserviceable condition since 
the war ; the French and British mandatory adminis- 
trations carefully concentrated the locomotives and 
rolling stock in their areas, and the Hedjaz government 
has none left. 

The Mohammedan world conference at Mecca (1926) 
and Jerusalem (1931) demanded the conveyance of the 
Hedjaz Railway as a Mohammedan waqf to Islamic 
administration, and drew up plans for the continuation 
of the railway to Mecca and Jidda. These projects could 
only be carried into execution after a union of the Arab 
states of Syria, Transjordania, and Hedjaz, just as the 
union between these states and Iraq would make possible, 
with all its potential importance, the completion of the 
whole Arabian system from Aleppo via Mosul and 
Baghdad to Basra on one side and via Damascus and 
Amman to Mecca on the other side. (The Aleppo-Basra 
line would not then go via Nissibin, which would mean 
crossing the Turkish frontier, but would be carried through 
Deir-ez-Zor, to open up the fertile grain lands along the 
Upper Euphrates.) But the revival of this plan is not 
in British interests, and the various Arab states are much 
too weak to be able to carry it out with their ownresources. 
The British victory has left the Baghdad and Hedjaz 



132 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

railway projects uncompleted. Their place is to be taken 
by a British scheme which has been maturing for decades, 
that of the all-British railway from the Mediterranean 
to the Persian Gulf , the British land route to India. 



THE ALL-BRITISH RAILWAY 

The Baghdad Railway and the attack of Turkish 

troops on the Suez Canal in the course of the world war 

opened British eyes to the urgency of safeguarding the 

land route to India and the access to the Suez Canal from 

the east. With the occupation of Egypt there was bound 

up the natural tendency of all strong rulers of Egypt to 

bring Palestine also into subjection. In the years 1892 

and 1906 matters came to a head between Turkey and 

Great Britain, Britain successfully enforcing the claim to 

Egyptian possession of the Sinai peninsula. The 

Palestine Exploration Fund founded in England for 

archaeological studies did preliminary work of the utmost 

importance for the conquest, of the country. It began its 

work with a cartographical survey of the Holy Land, 

carried out by British officers, one of whom was Kitchener, 

who later was British High Commissioner in Egypt. 

In the last year before the world war the Palestine 

Exploration Fund carried out survey work for strategical 

purposes in the Sinai peninsula* Among those who took 

part in this was T. E. Lawrence, who a short time later 

was to become known as the leader of the Arab rising 

against the Turks. Thus the conquest of Palestine, for 

which the world war provided the opportunity, had long 

been in preparation. As long before this as the end of 

the nineteenth century a British company had secured 

a railway concession in Palestine, the execution of which 

would, with very slight exceptions, have anticipated the 

all-British railway now planned from the Mediterranean 

to the Persian Gulf. The railway was to lead in one 

direction from Haifa via Damascus to Mesopotamia ; in 

the other direction it was to connect Haifa with Port 

Said. This second part of the original plan was carried 



OF WORLD COMMUNICATIONS 133 

out during the world war. Haifa is connected with the 
Suez Canal by a railway running southwards along the 
Mediterranean coast. The immemorial caravan route 
from Egypt to Syria, a route alike for armies and for 
traders, has been revived by this modern means of 
transport in its double significance. The building of this 
railway and the possession of Palestine render the eastern 
bank of the Suez Canal safe from future attacks on the 
part of enemy Powers. 

But Palestine is of importance for a second reason, 
and one which renders the Palestine mandate of more 
importance to the British Empire than even the control 
over Egypt. Palestine (not Alexandria) is the Mediter- 
ranean point of departure of the land and air route to 
India. With the aid of a British loan which Palestine 
had to accept, the railway built by Britain during the 
war from the Suez Canal to Haifa was paid for and 
acquired by the Palestinian-British government. The 
loan also provided the means for the construction of the 
modern port of Haifa, which is to become the great 
British oil depot and airport of the eastern Mediterranean 
basin. Part of the oil from northern Mesopotamia is 
conveyed by pipe-line through the Syrian desert to Haifa. 
Haifa is to be the point of departure of a railway to Bagh- 
dad, leading through Palestine, Transjordania, and Iraq 
entirely through territory which is either, like Palestine, 
directly under the administration of the British crown or 
brought indirectly under its influence by treaties. In 
order to safeguard the communications and the pipe-line 
through the desert, the British government has cultivated 
friendly relations with the Arabs since the world war ; 
friendship with the Arabs, though without over-promoting 
their state organization, is an element of critical impor- 
tance in Great Britain's India policy. The route to India 
is to be under British influence. Transjordania and Iraq 
received a long stretch of common frontier, so dividing 
the French mandated territory from inner Arabia. 

It was difficult at first for Great Britain to reconcile 
herself to the idea of French possession of important 



134 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

sections of the Mediterranean shore after the world war 
Aleppo, Antioch, Alexandretta, and Tripoli, the very 
ports and cities which in ancient and medieval times had 
formed the natural and the nearest means of access to 
the Mediterranean for Mesopotamia and Persia. As 
" historic heir of the Crusaders " France had tried to 
include Palestine in her sphere of influence, but the 
safeguarding of the eastern bank of the Suez Canal from 
the neighbourhood of another Great Power, and the 
possession of the Bay of Haifa, were vital to Great Britain 
if she was to be able to protect the route to India. 

The contemplated all-British railway would pass round 
the French mandated territory, losing economic value 
but gaining in strategic importance. From Haifa the 
railway will lead to Baghdad and to Basra on the Persian 
Gulf. It will run through the level plain ; to the north 
it will be excellently safeguarded strategically from 
Turkey and the Soviet Union by the range of Kurdish 
mountains in the Mosul area, for which, for this reason, 
Great Britain struggled with Turkey for many years, 
finally succeeding in forcing a decision in her own favour. 

The continuation of the railway through southern 
Iran and its linking with the railway network of 
Baluchistan is resolutely opposed by Iran, which has no 
desire to see the southern part of her territory turned 
once more into a glacis for British India. Baghdad is, 
however, to be connected with the future Iranian railway 
system and so with Teheran, so that Iranian trade may 
find an outlet through Iraq and not through the Soviet 
Union. 

Haifa, however, is connected not only with Asia but 
through Kantara with Cairo and with the future British 
line through Africa, the Cape to Cairo railway. The 
all-British railway from Cape Town to Cairo and on 
through Haifa to Baghdad and India will connect the 
important British possessions in the Old World like a 
girdle ; the last obstacles to its completion, Germany in 
East Africa and Turkey in Arabia, have been removed by 
the world war. Before this railway has been completed 



OF WORLD COMMUNICATIONS 135 

it has been beaten by air transport. The narrow line 
from Cairo to Haifa is the apex of a tremendous angle 
whose other extremes are at Cape Town and Calcutta. 
The bold territorial and imperial planning of the British 
has pursued this vast strategic plan of communications, 
perhaps the greatest in history, for decades with a 
tenacious logic and a mastery which have been accom- 
panied by good fortune. They have prepared the way 
for its execution through a policy which appears full of 
improvisations and strokes of good fortune, but for all 
that with an intrinsic and almost intuitive logical con- 
sistency and an unfailingly clear-headed realization of 
what they were after. 

British imperial policy first developed into conscious 
planning after 1874, when Beaconsfield inaugurated the 
policy of imperialism and, under pressure from him, 
Queen Victoria adopted the title of Empress of India. 
From then on, for the sake of the Empire, in which 
Liberal England had had little interest, the safeguarding 
of the routes to India became a principal concern. The 
possession of Palestine, and the strategic enclosure of the 
Indian Ocean, the Red Sea, and the Persian Gulf, and their 
conversion into British lakes, have established British 
control of the sea and land routes to India and to East 
and South Africa with a firmness which, to all appearance, 
could only be shaken from without through an entire 
collapse of the present system of Great Powers. 

While the firm linking together of the various parts of 
the British Empire is of great importance to Great Britain, 
the linking up of the new railway with Europe interests 
her much less. Just as she has not completed the 
Baghdad Railway via Mosul, with the result that there is 
no direct link between Europe and the Persian Gulf via 
Constantinople, so again the direct landroute fromEurope 
via Constantinople, Aleppo, and Haifa to Cairo is not being 
completed. The Taurus Express, in connection with the 
Orient Express, is only able to take passengers to Baghdad 
by motor traffic past Mosul ; the Cairo Express of the 
Sleeping Car Company takes its passengers only as far 



136 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

as Tripoli in Syria, where motor cars take them on via 
Beirut to Haifa ; there they entrain again for Egypt. 
The all-British railway, however, from Haifa to Baghdad 
itself threatens to remain unbuilt owing to its costliness 
and its long uneconomic stretches. A motor road is to 
be constructed instead. The nature of the country 
seems to suggest an alternative to the British plans in the 
connection of Iraq and Iran with Beirut and Tripoli 
in Syria, the geographical and economic conditions being 
more favourable. More probable than a railway from 
Haifa to Baghdad is one from Beirut and Tripoli to Mosul, 
whence it would go on to Teheran and Baghdad. The 
French are planning the connection of the Syrian railway 
system, with its normal gauge track from Aleppo via 
Horns to Tripoli, with Mesopotamia. From Horns the 
railway is to go to Mosul via Palmyra (which was once an 
important centre for caravan traffic and the seat of an 
empire in the Syrian desert), and via Deir-ez-Zor on the 
Euphrates. The port of Beirut is being developed and is 
to out-distance Haifa, and Tripoli will receive the same 
oil supplies from Iraq as Haifa. So the rivalry of the 
Powers along the old trade routes of the land of the 
Levant is springing up again : Britain and France are 
both exerting themselves to develop their " own " 
Mediterranean ports as entrepots for European trade and 
communications with Mesopotamia and Iran, and to push 
their trade and their power into the interior of Asia 
along rival routes, both familiar to the ancients and 
to the Crusaders. This is the purpose of the railway 
planning. 

But the indigenous national governments are them- 
selves trying to develop railway systems which they intend 
to make independent of the imperial routes of communica- 
tion. Ibn Saud wants to connect Mecca with Medina 
and Jidda. The Iraq government wants to connect 
Baghdad with Mosul and Syria. Beirut is to be a free 
port for transit trade from the Mediterranean to Iraq and 
Iran. This will make the Haifa-Baghdad Eailway a 
still more doubtful matter. But motor car and aeroplane 



OF WORLD COMMUNICATIONS 137 

have awakened the old trade routes of the Levant to new 
life more rapidly than the railway. 

THE TRIUMPH OF THE MOTOR OAR 

Without question the motor car has made the greatest 
of revolutions in transport in the Levant. Its introduc- 
tion required no heavy outlay. Native workers quickly 
developed into skilled chauffeurs, not easily tired, and 
often wildly reckless. The motor car was soon no alien 
introduced and driven by foreigners ; it acquired citizen- 
ship and was soon able to adapt itself to difficult roads, or, 
rather, to the lack of roads. It conquered deserts and 
steppes, mountains and stony fields. Its coming led in a 
few years to the rapid spread of good roads. In most 
cases it did not run alongside the railway as in Europe ; 
it ran alongside the camel, competing with it in endurance 
and in the overcoming of difficulties. Along the great 
strategic main routes it is the forerunner and pioneer of 
the railway and the aeroplane. In the Levant it serves 
not only for short distance travel but often for regular 
communication in the regions without railways over 
distances of hundreds of miles. In the thinly populated 
regions, where it is impossible to find custom for a full 
service of trains, the railway cannot be made to pay ; in 
the absence of inland waterways (only Egypt and Iraq 
have inland water communication on any important 
scale), railways are of service only for such little goods 
transport as is to be had and for strategic needs. Apart 
from the very closely settled Egyptian river oasis, it is 
difficult for railways to get used to capacity. The 
situation of the motor car is different ; it is precisely in 
the thinly settled and difficult regions that its versatility 
makes it indispensable. 

In the Arabian desert and in Iran the introduction of 
the motor car has strengthened the central power ; its 
mobility has lengthened the arm of the executive and 
made possible a well ordered administration directed 
with a consistent purpose. King Ibn Saud can cross the 



138 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

Arabian peninsula from the Red Sea to the Persian Gulf 
by car in a few days ; a little while ago it would have 
taken him several weeks. His capital Riyadh, in the 
heart of central Arabia, is connected with Mecca and El 
Hasa by motor roads. There is no need for expensive 
roads in the steppes ; on the hard soil the direction is 
shown by tracks running parallel with one another, often 
over a breadth of a kilometre. Traffic through the deserts 
and vast steppes requires special preparation ; there are 
no water sources or reserves, and water, petrol, and spare 
parts must be carried in the car. But in recent years 
there has been remarkable progress. Strong rulers like 
Riza Shah in Iran and Ibn Saud in Arabia are fully alive 
to the fact that the independence and the internal peace 
and order of their states depend on the construction of a 
network of communications, and for the immediate 
future this means motor communications. 

The most important motor route in the Levant is that 
from Damascus to Baghdad. Damascus and Baghdad 
the two great centres of medieval times, Damascus itself 
one of the oldest cities of humanity, Baghdad united 
with the very earliest times through the neighbouring 
Babylon and Seleucia. Both command key positions on 
the route from the Mediterranean to the Indian Ocean* 
A few years ago the waterless and uninhabited steppe, 
500 miles long, between these two cities was crossed only 
by the camel. Since 1923 there has been a regular postal 
motor connection, and to-day motor cars, motor buses, 
and motor lorries go twice a week in each direction. On 
those days there is busy life in the desert. The cars leave 
Damascus early in the morning ; they run for a few miles 
through the green and thickly populated oasis; then 
they enter the steppe, after passing the Syrian frontier 
post of Khan Abu Shemat, about thirty miles from 
Damascus, where the telegraph line ends. Here there 
begins the infinity of the steppe. The motor vehicles, 
mostly of American manufacture, dwindle in it to small 
black points and disappear. Their 500-mile journey soon 
leads over firm sandy soil, which might be imagined to 



OF WORLD COMMUNICATIONS 139 

have been rolled ; over this the car can proceed at forty- 
five miles an hour ; but soon difficult shingle is reached, 
reducing speed to twenty miles an hour. In the evening 
Rutbah is reached a solitary fort in the desert, built in 
1926, 200 miles from the nearest human settlement, but 
an assemblage of the most modern technical achievements, 
filling station and hotel, airport and wireless transmitting 
station. The car goes on through the night, an astonish- 
ing achievement on the part of the one chauffeur, who sits 
for twenty-four hours at the wheel. In the early morning 
the long stream of the Euphrates may be seen across the 
desert. Baghdad has thus been brought within a day's 
journey from the Mediterranean. Formerly it took three 
weeks to go from Baghdad to Europe via Basra and 
Bombay ; now the old overland route has been revived. 
Here the automobile has not followed the railway but has 
done creative work of its own of the utmost importance 
in the field of communications. 

Postal traffic along this route has shown rapid growth 
in recent years : 





From Beirut to 
Baghdad. 


From Baghdad to 
Beirut. 


1927. 


1930. 


1927. 


1930. 


Letters (kilograms) 
Parcels (number) 


8,440 
3,521 


42,940 
9,379 


9,393 
1,484 


40,728 

3,782 



The number of passengers carried in 1930 was 15,800. 
Special motor lorries carried 2,133 tons of goods ; but the 
expensiveness of this method of transport leaves the field 
still open to the old caravan route for cheap goods, With 
the laying of the pipe-line from Iraq to the Mediterranean 
a telephone line has been carried along the motor route 
from Baghdad to Syria and Palestine. The asphalting 
of the route will reduce the duration of the motor 
journey from Damascus to Baghdad to some twelve hours. 

In spite of their importance to internal communica- 
tions in the Levant, the motor routes are of little political 



140 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

interest. Competition, on the other hand, in the newest 
means of transport, air transport, is of a highly political 
character. Unlike steamships, railways, and motor 
vehicles, which have more or less arrived at finality, 
aircraft may be expected to show very important advances. 
This prospect of revolutionary discoveries itself increases 
the political importance of air traffic. 



AIR TRAFFIC 

In March 1924, Imperial Airways was founded in 
London, the only great aviation company supported by 
the British government. It was granted a government 
subsidy for the period of ten years. In the course of these 
ten years the company, which originally had run air lines 
only in Western Europe, has reached the ends of the earth. 
In April 1929, it established the first regular world air 
service, between London and the East Indies. By 1932 
it had connected up the portions of the Empire in Africa, 
Asia Minor, and southern Asia, in an organized network 
of air services, which in 1935 was extended to Australia. 
The network of air routes from London to Cairo and the 
Cape and from London to Baghdad and India sets out to 
serve the same strategic purpose as the railway system 
(not yet completely developed and so overtaken by the 
new means of transport) connecting the Cape with Cairo, 
Baghdad, and India. 

Aircraft, of course, will never supplant railway and 
steamship ; their advantage in speed is set off by their 
inability to transport goods in bulk. The various forms 
of transport have to be co-ordinated and made use of as 
required by the geographical and economic conditions and 
by the conditions in regard to the size of the population. 
In the short period of twenty years the aeroplane has 
been so perfected and has brought such savings of time 
that, especially in regard to regions where communications 
are ill-developed or difficult, and for world routes, one can 
only agree with Richard Hennig's remark that " the world 
is on the threshold of changes in regard to communications 



OF WORLD COMMUNICATIONS 141 

which are probably of the most revolutionary nature that 
the history of human civilization has known ". 

At the same time world political relationships are 
taking on a new aspect. From Ternes in the Soviet 
Union to Cabul in Afghanistan used to be three or four 
weeks 5 caravan journey ; the aeroplane takes as many 
hours. The almost impassable barriers which Persia 
and Afghanistan with their high mountains and few 
passes placed between British India and Russian central 
Asia are disappearing before the aeroplane. This will 
necessarily mean that strategic positions in regard to 
Eastern policy hitherto regarded as impregnable may no 
longer be so. There are still many difficulties to be 
overcome ; but .the time is not far distant when in 
regard to communications, but also in regard to the 
security of frontiers and spheres of influence, the geogra- 
phical conditions will become more and more irrelevant. 
Mountains and deserts which in the Near East have 
formed strategic bastions of the first rank, and which 
still represent serious obstacles to railway and motor 
car, are of no service against aircraft. Great Britain 
has quickly recognized this. As once she went in search 
of naval bases, coaling stations, and cable stations, and 
later of oilfields with pipe-line routes and railways to 
serve them, she is now concentrating her attention on 
airports and air lines. Germany has concentrated on 
the development of her home air lines, so that to-day 
she has the closest network in the world, and after the 
relaxation of the restrictions in the Treaty of Versailles 
in 1926 she rapidly came to the fore in European air 
communications : Great Britain has concerned herself 
first with the development of long distance oversea 
communications in every part of her Empire. These 
great trans-continental air lines are to span the earth 
like her world-wide realm. At the same time they are 
to be of strictly national character and are to be as little 
dependent as possible on landing places under other 
than British sovereignty. But already there are rivals 
for the trans-continental dominion of the air, and before 



142 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

long there mil come a straggle similar to those for the 
dominion of land and sea. 

The first international conflict over air routes was 
associated with the organization of the East Indies 
line of Imperial Airways. The first regular air-mail 
service in the Near East was organized by the British 
Royal Air Force, in August 1921, between Cairo and 
Baghdad. It was a fortnightly service. Imperial 
Airways took it over in January 1927, extended it to 
Basra, and turned it in April 1927 into a weekly service. 
This was itself an important advance, for the length 
of journey from Cairo via Gaza (in the south of Palestine), 
Rutbah, and Baghdad to Basra was now only twenty- 
seven hours. The Indian mail could thus reach London 
with a very substantial saving of time. Baghdad 
could be reached from the Mediterranean by daylight. 
Imperial Airways saw in the Cairo-Basra air line only 
a section of the East Indies line, which was to be opened 
in 1928 over the south of Persia, As early as 1926, 
at the Imperial Conference, the line from Cairo to Basra, 
Bushire, Bandar Abbas and Karachi was announced 
as " an approach towards a system of Imperial air 
communications ". 

But the Persian government entered a protest 
against any flying over south Persian territory. Tedious 
negotiations followed, and not until December 1928 
was an agreement arrived at, permitting Imperial Air- 
ways to fly over southern Persia and to land in Persian 
airports for the period of three years, under very 
burdensome conditions. Consequently it was not until 
1929 that the air route from London to Cairo, Baghdad 
and Karachi could be inaugurated. Meanwhile air mails 
to and from Baghdad had steadily grown in volume. 
The number of postal packets carried was 63,883 in 1926, 
306,674 in 1927, and 536,775 in 1928. 

On April 1st, 1929, the Iraq government took over the 
control of passenger, mail, and commercial air com- 
munications within its territory, and the aerodrome at 
Baghdad- West, which thus became accessible to civil and 



OF WORLD COMMUNICATIONS 143 

foreign aviators. Baghdad became a junction for impor- 
tant air routes. Under the British-Persian treaty the 
German Junker air service in Persia was extended, on 
and after April 1st, 1929, from Teheran via Kasr-i-Shiran 
to Baghdad. Thus Baghdad was finally brought out of 
its isolation ; it was connected with India, Egypt, and 
Persia, the seats of ancient civilization, and also with 
London and (via Teheran) with Moscow and Berlin. 
In April 1930 the Erench Air Union instituted a weekly 
air service from Damascus to Baghdad. The automobile 
had reduced the distance between the two cities to some 
twenty-six hours ; the aeroplane reduced it to little more 
than four. In October 1930 the Dutch air lines began a 
weekly air service from Amsterdam via Baghdad to 
Batavia. Aircraft of four nations met in the airport of 
Baghdad, which had become of international importance 
in world communications. 

At Cairo the Imperial Airways lines branch off to the 
Cape and to India. In Africa and Asia Imperial -Airways 
use only landing places in territory under British influence. 
The single exception was Iran, with which the British 
treaty concerning air communications expired in 1932 ; 
from then on Imperial Airways have no longer flown via 
southern Persia but over the Persian Gulf, where groups 
of islands off Arabia under British influence have been 
selected as landing places. Asia and Africa are ultimately 
to be connected through British territory by a line from 
India via southern Arabia (Oman, Hadramaut, Aden) to 
British East Africa. The security of all these air lines, 
with that of the all-British railway from Haifa to Basra 
and another railway intended ultimately to run from 
Akaba to Kuweit, requires the maintenance of peace in 
the Arabian peninsula ; here again the importance to 
the Empire is revealed of the Pax Britannica in Arabia, 
one of the war aims in the world war. 

But the British air lines have no monopoly in the Near 
East. Air communications are being developed with 
great energy in Soviet Central Asia, and carried up to the 
borders of India. In 1927 the Persian government 



144 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

granted a concession to the German Junker company for 
a regular service of air mails and communications for the 
period of five years. The Junker company fulfilled its 
task very well under difficult conditions ; it established 
four air lines from Teheran, via Resht to Baku (connecting 
with Moscow), to Meshed (with connection to Herat and 
Cabul), via Hamadan and Kermanshah to Baghdad 
(with connection to Cairo), and via Ispahan and Shiraz to 
Bushire (with connection to India). Thus the great 
Russian and German networks of communication were 
extended to the Persian Gulf and to Afghanistan. 

Iran has not only been connected in this way with 
world communications in all directions, but has also been 
given by the aeroplane new opportunities of control of 
her own territory. A caravan going from Teheran to 
Bushire, the principal port on the Persian Gulf, took 
some seven weeks ; the motor car took ten days to a fort- 
night ; the aeroplane takes seven hours. The German 
Lijifthansa is planning an air line from Berlin via Athens, 
to Baghdad, Teheran, and Kabul. Baghdad will thus 
be brought within two days' journey from Berlin, India 
within four. What a shortening in comparison with the 
days of the Baghdad Railway ! 

The French lines originally intended to extend their 
air service via Istanbul (Constantinople) and Ankara to 
Aleppo in Syria. But Turkey refused to permit foreign 
aviation companies to fly over her territory. She is 
considering the development of a national air service, to 
connect Istanbul and Ankara with the mountain regions, 
at present difficult of access, in eastern Anatolia. For 
years a national aviation society has been carrying on 
busy propaganda, and preparations are being made for 
the opening of a regular line, purely Turkish, from Istanbul 
via Eskishehir, Ankara, and Konia to Diarbekir. The 
western and eastern regions of the republic will thus be 
brought within nine hours' flight of each other. An 
extension from Diarbekir to Teheran is proposed. A 
national Turkish line from Istanbul via Ankara and 
Teheran to Kabul would mean a strengthening of the 



OF WORLD COMMUNICATIONS 145 

alKance of the three independent Near Eastern states. 
The other states of the Near East are also considering 
national aviation ; Egypt, Iraq, and Iran are training 
young officers and students as aircraft pilots and 
engineers. All these states, and even Nejd, have already 
purchased aircraft and built up the nucleus of an air 
fleet of their own. These efforts are part of the general 
policy of emancipation of the Near Eastern states. The 
young Egyptian or Iraqi, Turk or Iranian has learnt to 
drive a car ; he is now learning to pilot a plane. Students 
are being sent for this purpose to Europe by their govern- 
ments, and Egyptian and Iraqi aviators have already 
flown their craft from London to Cairo or Baghdad. 
Aircraft were unknown in the Near East a few years 
ago ; now they are being naturalized. 

France has in Syria the base of a trans-continental 
air system. The Air Union has a regular service by 
flying boat from Marseilles to Beirut. The Syrian airport 
is to be transferred later to Tripoli, where the French 
pipe-line from Mosul reaches the Mediterranean, and 
where the normal gauge railway from Anatolia via 
Aleppo ends. From Damascus French aircraft fly to 
Baghdad, whence there is air mail connection with 
Saigon and French Indo-China. Dutch aircraft connect 
Amsterdam with Sumatra in eight days. The three 
great air lines are trying to arrange their time-tables so 
that there may be a daily air service from western 
Europe to India and south-east Asia. But no effort of 
the other Powers approaches the breadth of the British 
imperial conception, which has already created a per- 
manent framework to connect up the British world 
empire in the , organization and safeguarding of world 
routes by water, land, and air. In the Old World the 
Levant is the base and the junction of this system of 
communications, which in the last decade has been 
developed on a grand scale. The system is beginning to 
restore the old importance of the Levant, which lay so 
long isolated from world traffic. The result has been the 
final completion of the inclusion of the Near East in the 

10 



146 WORLD COMMUNICATIONS 

world-wide economic system initiated by Europe. The 
process of Europeanization, begun only superficially by 
means of the lines of communication opened in the 
nineteenth century, is now penetrating every field of 
social and individual life. 



INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS OF 
WORLD ECONOMICS 

COTTON 

COTTON has played the principal part in the history of the 
Europeanization of economic life in the Near East. 
Clothing is one of man's principal needs, and accordingly 
the textile industry, 80 per cent, of which is concerned 
with cotton, has played a decisive part in economic 
history and is to this day one of the principal elements in 
world trade and industry. With the Oriental's liking for 
clothing and materials of fine quality and varied colours, 
the trader in piece goods and clothing has been the 
pioneer since the end of the eighteenth century in the 
economic transformation of the East. It was through the 
textile dealer that mass production first replaced 
individual production in native trade, through him that 
imports grew, and therewith the need of capital, through 
>nni that ^trade began to take the place of barter, that a 
class of traders grew up and began systematically to exploit 
the opportunities of business. 

Cotton, which is of Indian origin, was known in the 
Mediterranean region in the time of Herodotus. But it 
was not until the time of the Crusades that it began to 
play its important part in economic life and to penetrate 
Europe from the Levant. It was the creator of the 
wealth of the Italian cities and of their superiority over the 
Flanders wool trade, and it was responsible for the revival 
of the trade routes of the Levant. The great demand for 
the highly valued coloured cotton fabrics was one of the 
principal causes of the industrial revolution of the 
eighteenth century in England. Between 1764 and 1800 
the cotton consumption in England doubled every ten 
years. Its cheapening increased the demand and 
increased the incentive to cotton cultivation. There was 



147 



148 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

a rapid growth of slave plantations in the southern states 
of North America ; until then the centre of the plantation 
industry had been in the West Indies. In 1784 no more 
than seventeen bales of raw cotton were exported from the 
United States ; in 1852 the States were already producing 
three million bales, two-thirds of the total being exported, 
mainly to England. 

In England in the second half of the eighteenth century 
there grew up in the southern part of Lancashire, in an 
old wool-working area, the most important cotton manu- 
facturing centre of the whole world. The mild and 
damp climate was regarded as particularly suited to this 
manufacture. Lancashire had already been specially 
favoured by its geographical situation and by its coal- 
fields ; it was in Manchester that in 1789 the first steam- 
driven factory began operations. Liverpool, with its 
great natural advantages as a port, had become famous 
in the eighteenth century as a port of departure of the 
fleets engaged in the slave trade ; the industrial develop- 
ment of Lancashire was made possible by the profits from 
this trade. In the nineteenth century Liverpool attained 
world importance through the import of raw cotton 
and the export of cotton piece goods. Since 1760 
Lancashire had had a splendid system of navigable 
canals, and seventy years later the first railway was 
built there, from Manchester to Liverpool. 

The population of the county grew from 673,486 in 
1801 to 4,406,409 a hundred years later. Between 1769, 
the year of Arkwright's epoch-making invention, and 
1860, the import of raw cotton was multiplied four hun- 
dred times. In 1860, owing to the Civil War in the 
United States, there began the five hard years of the 
Cottoji Famine. The Lancashire industry was crippled 
by the absence of cotton imports, and the many thousands 
of working families who depended on cotton for their 
whole living suffered real starvation. 

These years of want demonstrated to the Lancashire 
industry and to the British Empire the urgent necessity 
of making the supplies of raw cotton as far as possible 



OF WORLD ECONOMICS 149 

independent of imports from the United States. More- 
over, with the victory of the industrial North over the 
agricultural South in the American Civil War there began 
a rapid industrialization in the United States, and the 
country began itself to spin the bulk of its own production 
of raw cotton. Raw cotton imports had become a vital 
matter for the Lancashire cotton industry, and so became 
one of the main concerns of British imperial policy, which 
directed its efforts more and more to securing imports of 
raw cotton from the Empire and from Egypt. The prin- 
cipal Empire source was India, producing a cheap cotton ; 
Egypt produced cotton of high quality. 

The competition for the raw material supply con- 
tinued with increased intensity in the twentieth century. 
In 1914 the world cotton production was about 25,500,000 
bales (of 500 Ibs.) ; Empire and Egyptian supplies 
totalled 6,250,000 bales or about a quarter of the world 
production. On the other hand, the Empire and 
Egyptian production of high quality cotton (Egyptian 
Sakellaridis and American Sea Island) was 89 per cent, 
of the world total. The Lancashire cotton mills are the 
principal consumers of the long-fibred Egyptian cotton, 
which requires special machinery. In Great Britain 
there was founded in 1902 the British. Cotton Growing 
Association, and in 1921 the Empire Cotton Growing 
Corporation, both concerned with promoting British 
self-sufficiency in raw cotton supplies. After the turn of 
the century there were similarly increased efforts in 
Germany, France, Italy, and Japan, who began active 
promotion of cotton cultivation in their colonies. 

Russia had begun a similar policy years before, after 
the conquest of her Central Asian territories in Turkestan, 
where, since 1884, American medium qualities had been 
introduced in place of the short-fibred native cotton. In 
Fergana, the principal cotton-growing district in 
Turkestan, the area under native cotton in 1888 was 
56 per cent. ; by the end of the century the area under 
cultivation had been multiplied by five and the propor- 
tion under native cotton had fallen to 7 per cent. By 



150 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

1914 the cotton production in Turkestan had reached 
1,270,000 bales. During the War and the years of 
revolution it steadily fell until in 1921 it was no more than 
43,000 bales. The Soviet Union has energetically 
promoted the recovery of cotton cultivation, and by 
1928-1929 it had already reached the fifth place 
among the cotton producing countries of the world, 
after the United States, British India, China, and 
Egypt. In 1934 the raw cotton production of the 
Soviet Union reached 1,850,000 bales, surpassing 
Egypt and accounting for about 8 per cent, of the total 
world production. 

The highly industrialized countries exerted themselves 
to induce their supply countries to standardize cultivation, 
concentrating it mainly or almost exclusively on the 
production of a single raw material. This happened in 
Egypt, originally a wheat-growing country, which had 
itself produced the whole of the food needed by its popu- 
lation; it became dependent for its existence on the 
export of raw cotton to Lancashire and the import of 
foodstuffs. In this way colonial or semi-colonial countries, 
confined to a single type of production, became entirely 
dependent on the industrial countries economically and, 
therefore, politically. 

Restriction to cotton cultivation involves many 
dangers for the planter. His dependence on the world 
market, on the state of the harvest in other countries, and 
on international price movements makes his business 
highly speculative. The standard of living of the cotton 
cultivators is everywhere extremely low. The fact that 
they only get payment for their produce once a year 
makes the credit problem specially acute. 

Alongside the struggle for raw material territories 
comes the competition for markets. Cotton manufac- 
tures are to this day the principal imports in Oriental 
countries. In India and Egypt cotton goods are much 
the most important imports as raw cotton is the most 
important export. In China in 1931 the value of cotton 
goods imported was nearly four times that of the next item 



OF WORLD ECONOMICS 151 

of imports. In all the countries of the Near East, Turkey, 
Iran, Syria, Palestine, cotton goods head the imports. 

The importance of cotton to Great Britain is no less 
than to the Orient. In British exports cotton yarns and 
piece goods have for many years held much the most 
important position. British exports of cotton goods 
amounted in value to 126,000,000 in 1913, and in 1924 to 
199,000,000. Iron and steel products came next and 
their value was much less than half that of the exported 
cotton goods. Recent years, with the growing economic 
crisis, have brought a fall in the absolute value of the 
exports of cotton goods, but they remain the principal 
British exports. The exports of cotton yarns and 
cotton piece goods in 1930 totalled 87,000,000, in 1931 
66,000,000 and in 1935 60,000,000. Raw cotton 
similarly takes the first place in the importation of raw 
materials into Great Britain. The figures, like the export 
figures, reflect the general movement in volume of trade 
and price levels : 

1913 .. .. 70,000,000 

1924 .. .. 121,000,000 

1930 .. .. 45,000,000 

1931 .. .. 34,000,000 
1935 .. .. 37,000,000 

These figures show the immense importance of cotton 
in British trade and industry. Cotton is of the greatest 
importance to world trade, and no less important on 
the political side is the struggle for raw cotton supply 
regions and for markets for cotton goods. In the era of 
Imperialism there is no separating the political from the 
economic struggle in world affairs. "Nothing is more 
characteristic of the transformations of the raw material 
supply system than the fact that its conduct is visibly 
determined by political considerations under the influence 
of political ideas. This is a fact of fundamental impor- 
tance in the present phase of world economic development/ 9 
(Walther Pahl.) In the nineteenth century equilibrium 
seemed for a time to have been attained : colonial or semi- 
colonial countries produced the raw materials ; the 



152 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

industrial countries transported them in their ships, 

worked them up at home, and then supplied the whole 

world with their manufactures. This structure of the 

capitalist trade and industry of the nineteenth century 

underwent two fundamental changes in the twentieth, 

which are still working themselves out in the struggle 

for raw material supplies and in that for markets. Both 

axose out of the increase or awakening of nationalism 

in the colonial and semi-colonial countries, which found 

expression in the struggle both for political and for 

economic independence, the latter by means of the 

organization of a national economic system as nearly as 

possible self-sufficient and independent of the outside 

world. A very important part in this transformation 

in world trade was played by the world war. It largely 

destroyed the connection between raw material countries 

and industrial countries ; at the same time it increased 

bhe demand for cotton and so led many new countries 

bo embark on cotton cultivation or the manufacture of 

cotton goods. Colonial or semi-colonial countries which 

hitherto had confined themselves to exporting raw cotton 

began to manufacture it. 

The awakening or growing nationalism set out to 
liberate its countries from dependence on the developed 
industrial countries, and saw in industrialization a means 
of attaining economic independence. In the old European 
centres of the textile industry production fell in com- 
parison with pre-war times ; it grew in the countries 
which formerly had either supplied the raw material or 
been dependent on imports of the finished goods. 
Between 1913 and 1926 cotton manufacture was nearly 
trebled in China. It was more than doubled in Japan, 
which has developed a new Lancashire in Osaka and 
grows cotton in its colony of Korea, and which also is 
favourably situated in regard to freight to India. In 
British India and in Brazil cotton manufacture increased 
more than 50 per cent, in the same period. Between 
1913 and 1925 the number of spindles in Europe increased 
from 99 to 101 millions ; in the same period the number 



OF WORLD ECONOMICS 153 

in Asia increased from 8 to 17 millions. This evolution 
has since continued. In 1934 the number of spindles in 
Europe had decreased to 96 millions ; the number in Asia 
had increased to 23 millions. The corresponding evolu- 
tion in regard to looms is no less striking. In 1913 
Europe had 1,857,000, America 804,000, and Asia only 
121,000 looms. Twenty years later, in 1933, the 
European and American figures had fallen to 1,847,000 
and 766,000 ; the number in Asia had grown to 515,000. 
The world consumption of raw cotton in 1925 totalled 
some 23,000,000 bales ; of this America manufactured 
7,000,000, Europe 9,500,000, Asia 6,500,000. In 1933 to 
1934 the world consumption totalled about 25,000,000 
bales, of which America manufactured 6,600,000, Europe 
9,900,000 and Asia 8,100,000. 

The United States mainly manufacture their own 
cotton, and have so great a home market that exports 
are not of critical importance to them. Great "Britain 
still imports most of its cotton from America, which is 
still the greatest of the world's producers of raw cotton, 
and it is inevitable that Great Britain should fear depen- 
dence on American price dictation. Hence the British 
concentration on the development of new sources of raw 
cotton supply, in spite of falling sales. But the hope 
of self-sufficiency is still far from realization. For the 
present Great Britain is able only to draw a small part 
of her cotton supplies from Egypt, India, and other 
cotton countries. Unlike America, she is mainly 
dependent on sales abroad. In 1934 to 1935 she con- 
sumed about 2,500,000 bales of raw cotton. Of this, 
1,049,000 bales came from the United States, 520,000 
from South America, 362,000 from Egypt, 342,000 from 
India, and 107,000 from the Soudan. Not only for her 
raw material supply but also for her sales Great Britain, 
unlike America, is mainly dependent on foreign markets. 

Originally the new textile industries manufactured 
the cheap sorts of cotton, but they are gradually embark- 
ing on the more complicated stages of manufacture. 
The fall in raw material prices forms a strong incentive 



154 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

to the industrialization of the raw material countries, as 
they keep for themselves the substantial margin of 
manufacturing costs. At the same time there is setting 
in an interesting retrograde movement in transport. In 
the nineteenth century the cheapening and speeding up 
of transport had made industry more and more independent 
of its situation in regard to its raw material source. This 
independence was largely reinforced by the superiority of 
the West in capital, technical equipment, and supply of 
skilled labour. The penetration of capitalism and 
of technical equipment and knowledge of the countries of 
the East is gradually levelling away this former advantage. 
With it is proceeding a return of manufacturing industry 
to the site of its raw material supply. " The advantages 
to industry of working where it has direct access to its 
raw material are once more exercising a strong influence. 
This shifting of industrial sites to the source of the raw 
material supply is, of course, damaging those manufactur- 
ing industries which had been built up through technical 
experience of production and the skill of the workers 
and had drawn their raw material from oversea colonial 
territories. The growing supply of Asiatic markets 
by their own mills has plunged the British textile industry 
into a serious sales crisis. The circumstance that a large 
part of the Indian cotton crop is now manufactured in 
India is compelling Britain to look round for new sources 
of cotton supply. Textile machinery can only work at 
a profit when it has an adequate supply of raw cotton." 
(Walther Pahl.) 

Nationalism not only works for industrialization but 
also combats specialization in crop production. Egypt 
had become a cotton country, to the prejudice of its food 
production. It had so been made wholly dependent on 
world trade, though only participating passively and 
without any initiative of its own. It had become entirely 
dependent on foreign countries for the feeding of its 
population. Lancashire bought its raw cotton ; if prices 
fell or if Lancashire declined to buy, Egypt was threatened 
with destitution. The country produced little of what 



OF WORLD ECONOMICS 155 

it could consume itself. It had to import almost every- 
tliing it lived on, foodstuffs as well as manufactured goods. 
Cotton planting in Egypt had been begun in 1821 by 
Mehemet Ali, the great modernizer of his country. The 
American Civil War brought an increase in cotton prices 
which stimulated cotton growing in Egypt. But only 
after the British occupation of the country was cotton 
cultivation systematically promoted to the neglect of all 
else. In 1920 in Lower Egypt more than 45 per cent, 
of the cultivable area, and even in the less fertile Upper 
Egypt more than 34 per cent., was planted with cotton. 
The Egyptian cotton crops grew as follows : 



Tear. 



Cantors. 



1821 (Introduction of cotton cultivation) 

1830 

1863 (American Civil War) 
1882 (British occupation) 



944 

213,585 
1,181,888 
2,912,073 
8,531,172 
7,780,000 



Not until Egypt achieved at least formal independence 
and, in 1929, fiscal sovereignty, was she able to take 
steps to make an end of these conditions. While trade 
was booming, and with the rise in raw-cotton prices 
during the world war, Egypt's concentration on cotton 
brought her great wealth, but with the fall in price 
during the years of crisis it threatened the economic 
existence of the country. This explains the efforts to 
broaden the economic basis and to go over to the produc- 
tion of the country's own food. The national govern- 
ment is trying to promote and develop grain and 
especially fruit and vegetable cultivation by means of 
tariff measures, instruction, and material assistance. 

With her growing political independence and her 
detachment from the Imperial connection and the sphere 
of direct British influence, Egypt is ceasing to be a 
dependable source of Lancashire's raw material supply. 



156 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

The British government has accordingly taken steps to 
introduce and increase cotton cultivation in recent years 
in those parts of East Africa which are climatically suit- 
able for it and are under British control in the Soudan, 
and in Uganda. The Soudan produces cotton of a similar 
excellent quality to that of the best Egyptian, the black 
labour is even cheaper than Egyptian, and the political 
and economic conditions enable cultivation to proceed on 
a vast scale under uniform leadership, with suitable 
irrigation. The cultivation has also direct political 
advantages for Great Britain : while Egypt is beginning 
more and more to slip out of her control, Great Britain 
is establishing herself in the Soudan, whose growing 
cotton production is threatening the livelihood of the 
Egyptian fellaheen and whose growing consumption of 
Nile water threatens to sever the vital nerve of Egypt's 
existence. Through her possession of the Soudan Great 
Britain remains the unchallengeable controller of Egypt 
and her destiny. The possibility of the extension of the 
irrigated area in the Soudan hangs over Egypt like a 
sword of Damocles. Great Britain has also made the 
Soudan commercially independent of Egypt by building 
a railway from Khartoum to Port Soudan on the Red Sea, 
and so has provided the Soudan with direct access to the 
sea for its imports and exports.. As recently as 1910 
Egypt's share in African production of raw cotton was 
96 per cent. ; by 1929 it had fallen to 77 per cent. For- 
merly rubber was the principal commercial product of 
the Soudan; the growth of raw-cotton production is 
shown by the following figures : 



Year. 


Ginned Cotton. 


Cotton Seed. 


Rubber. 


1922 
1923 
1930 

1934 



341,796 
458,188 
3,046,330 



63,437 
71,235 
205,746 



- 530,023 
1,006,623 
980,157 

494,740 


2,173,557 



OF WORLD ECONOMICS 



157 



These figures, bearing in mind the fall in raw material 
prices, show the rapid development in the importance of 
cotton cultivation for the Soudan. As in all other eastern 
countries, imports of cotton goods into the Soudan are 
much the most important item of all. Uganda also shows 
a steady growth of cultivation. The area under cotton 
increased between 1923 and 1930 from 418,600 to 739,690 
acres. In 1934 it was 1,170,000 acres. The cotton crop 
grew from 14,000 bales in 1913-14 to 102,000 in 1925 and 
198,000 in 1934. 

Egypt is the only important cotton country in the 
Levant ; cotton is planted in Turkey, Iran, and Syria, 
but is of much less importance than other products. Its 
importance is greatest in Turkey. In Iraq cotton 
cultivation has been fostered by the British Cotton Grow- 
ing Association, but without much success as yet. France 
claimed the fertile cotton area of Cilicia in the Treaty of 
Sevres, but had later to give it back to nationalist Turkey ; 
now she is trying to promote cotton cultivation in Syria 
through the Association Cotonniere Coloniale, and has 
introduced high-grade cotton plants from Texas into the 
Alauite territory. A Societ6 Cotonni&re de Syrie has been 
formed at Mulhouse, in Alsace. 

Hand in hand with this struggle for raw material 
sources goes the struggle for markets. In 1929 Great 
Britain was much the largest importer into Egypt, with 
21-2 per cent, of the total imports ; Italy came third. 
With both countries cotton manufactures were the 
predominant item of imports, Italy has become a 
serious rival of Great Britain in the Levant market. 
Egyptian imports in 1929 were as follows : 





From Great 
Britain. 


From Italy. 


Cotton piece goods 
Mixture fabrics (cotton and 
artificial silk) 
Cotton yarns 


E. 
3,059,000 

169,000 
140,000 


E. 
1,524,000 

588,000 
164,000 



158 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

Recently Japan has come more and more to the front 
in the importation of manufactured goods. In the 
French mandated territory of Syria the imports of cotton 
manufactures in 1930 were : 

From French 

francs. 

Great Britain . . 65,000,000 

Italy .. .. 49,000,000 

Japan .. .. 48,000,000 

France .. .. 6,000,000 

Germany .. .. 4,000,000 

In 1930 Japan came tenth among the countries import- 
ing into Syria. Four years later, in 1934, she had come 
up to the third place, the value of her imports of cotton 
manufactures into Syria being more than twice that of 
the combined imports from Great Britain and Italy. 
In Egypt in 1933 Japanese imports came next after 
British, surpassing those of Italy, Germany, and France. 
British exports of cotton goods fell from 3,434,862 in 
1929 to 1,053,499 in 1933 and 625,453 in 1935. 

There is a further serious competitor in the importa- 
tion of cotton goods into the Iranian market the 
Soviet Union. Its share of the total imports of cotton 
goods grew from 24-4 per cent, in 1927-8 to 46-9 in 
1928-9. In the same period the British percentage fell 
from 41 -6 to 27-3 and the Indian from 23-4 to 17-8. 

ECONOMIC TEANSFORMATIONS 

In his book on the problem of the Europeanization 
of economic life in the Orient, Reinhard Junge has 
remarked that the importation of Western textiles and 
other articles of consumption stimulates the extravagance 
of the Oriental, impoverishing Tn>n and preventing the 
formation of capital; and that "the absence of any 
national consciousness, typical up to quite recent times 
of all Islamic territories, must be regarded as, among 
other things, the absence of one of the defences against 
those dangerous influences ". Indigenous consumption 



OF WORLD ECONOMICS 159 

was increased and new needs were aroused, but nothing 
was done to increase indigenous production. Thus the 
growing but unproductive luxury of a small upper stratum 
of society brought progressive impoverishment of the 
general economic system in Oriental countries. 

In the era of capitulations and concessions the Ottoman 
empire, Persia, and Egypt were brought into passive 
association with world trade and world finance. The 
fiscal and customs systems were administered in the 
interest of European creditors and European trade, not in 
that of the indigenous trade and industry and its active 
development. With the growth of national consciousness 
the situation began to change. The modernization of 
the state and the growth in its strength in relation to the 
outer world had their effect in the economic field. Any 
active entry into the economic field, any deliverance 
from vassalage to the European capitalistic states, was 
dependent on a rational formation of capital and pro- 
vision of credit and on a choice of imports, with a corre- 
sponding organization of foreign trade, made in the 
interest of the development of indigenous trade and 
industry. Resources that had been merely hoarded 
needed to be put to use as productive capital, and at the 
same time the formation of capital through thrift had to 
be promoted. All economic reforms in the Orient are 
dependent on the training and instruction of the popula- 
tion, under state guidance by precept and practice, and 
with active state assistance in the modernization of the 
economic system. 

As without the guidance and assistance of the state 
neither the educational nor the psychological conditions 
axe provided for inducing the Oriental landowner, towns- 
man, or peasant, to take the risk of radically changing his 
methods of business, it becomes necessary for the state 
to do the pioneer work of economic transformation. For 
this reason the economic system in Turkey and Iran 
approximates to state capitalism, partly under the 
influence of the example of the Soviet Union on the other 
side of the frontier, which is going through a similar 



160 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

process of transformation. The modernization of the 
economic system has made the greatest advance in these 
independent states. Egypt and Iraq are following the 
same path, but in a less thorough-going way, owing to 
capitulations and to foreign interference in Egypt, and to the 
presence until recently of the mandatory government in 
Iraq. In Syria and Palestine the governments have 
done very little as yet to promote any thorough 
modernization of the indigenous economic and educa- 
tional systems. The measures taken by the national 
governments, to which detailed reference will be made in 
dealing with the various countries, may be summarized 
under the two main heads of creation of an indigenous 
industry and intensification of agriculture. 

In the first of these two fields Turkey decided in the 
spring of 1932 to found an industrial credit bank on the 
pattern of the agricultural bank. The new bank is to 
make advances on industrial buildings and for the pro- 
vision and working of industrial machinery, to assist the 
purchase of raw material for the country's industries, to 
facilitate and regulate the provision of credit for 
industrial enterprises, and to take over and offer for 
subscription their debenture issues. In Turkey and 
Iran many industrial enterprises have been started with 
state assistance. Egypt is the only country rich enough 
for an Egyptian bank to be founded (in 1920) by the 
initiative of a private individual out of private means, to 
undertake the tasks undertaken in Turkey and other 
countries by state institutions the training of a native 
staff in finance, commerce and industry, and the encourag- 
ing and financing of indigenous industrial, trading and 
transport companies. This bank, the Bank Misr, received 
state assistance after Egypt had gained her indepen- 
dence. 

But no less important than the provision of credits 
and of financial assistance in the starting of industries 
and the modernization of native industry, which can thus 
be made able to withstand competition, is the develop- 
ment of trained staffs through the organization of 



OF WORLD ECONOMICS 161 

industrial and trade schools and the provision of oppor- 
tunities for the indigenous population to take up positions 
in trade and industry which hitherto have been mainly 
occupied by foreigners, and so to acquire the needed 
capacity and experience. Industrialization incidentally 
performs a great educative function, promoting a psycho- 
logical and social transformation. The level of education 
and the standard of living of the lower strata are gradually 
raised. The states of the Near East are faced now with 
the task of enacting a modern code of labour legislation. 
This industrialization of the colonial and semi-colonial 
countries makes them less dependent on imports from older 
industrial areas, and must thus lead to a transformation 
of European industry and trade so far as it has been 
engaged mainly on exports overseas. 

The intensification of agriculture also presupposes an 
adequate provision of credit and a general educational 
and occupational training of the fellah. The Turkish 
Agricultural Bank, a national Turkish enterprise set up 
by the government and carried on under government 
supervision, helps in the starting of agricultural credit 
societies, co-operatives for buying and selling, and the 
provision of improved marketing opportunities. In 
Egypt the government has set up an agrarian bank for 
the provision of credits for small peasants, and also to 
assist in improving farming methods, to buy manure and 
seeds, and to help with credits and advice in the 
acquisition of agricultural machinery and animals for 
breeding. But an intensification of economic activity is 
only possible if the new credit institutes organize selling 
in the interest of the producers which is part of their 
task. Co-operation has proved one of the principal 
means of giving economic training. But before it can 
be effective it is necessary for the peasant to be relieved of 
his burden of indebtedness, often more than oppressive, 
owing to the usurious rates of interest to which he has 
had to submit in the absence of any organized agricultural 
credit ; it is also necessary for the tenants to be protected 
from arbitrary treatment by the landlords and from 

11 



162 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

expulsion from their holdings. Every agrarian reform 

must include regulation on a fixed plan of the agrarian 

taxation and the conditions of ownership. The technical 

work of increasing production must go hand in hand with 

the extension of the market, and the peasant must be 

placed by a suitable co-operative organization in a 

position to dispose freely of his products and to obtain the 

actual market price at a favourable moment. The 

co-operatives must see to it that the peasant actually 

receives the true yield of his production and is so enabled 

slowly to build up Ms capital, which will make it possible 

for him to re-invest his profits. The intensification of 

agriculture will lead to the increase of working capital in 

the countryside and will so help in turn in the creation of 

industries which will find their market among the 

increasingly prosperous peasantry. 

But this depends on an improvement in the general 
level of education, on training the peasant in methodical 
labour, and on accustoming him to watch and be guided 
by the opportunities open to him. With the trans- 
formation of economic life there sets in a human change ; 
the two are dependent on one another and condition one 
another just as in the economic sphere the intensification 
of labour precedes the intensification of capital, but each 
is a condition of and a promoter of the other. The 
modernization of the economic system is an extra- 
ordinarily complicated process, the many elements of 
which must be carefully attuned to one another, a gradual 
progress from stage to stage, the easing and execution of 
which requires the application of all the intellectual and 
moral forces of the nation, of its state organization and its 
leading personalities. 

It is here especially that there is felt in all the countries 
of the Levant the lack, so frequently to be noticed, of an 
intellectual and moral 61ite, numerous enough as a class 
to be able to bear the heavy burden of the process of 
transformation. There is a lack of the hard work of 
intellectual and psychological preparation, of under-, 
standing of economic relationships and their function in 



OF WORLD ECONOMICS 163 

political life ; the sense of responsibility for the whole 
community has not yet by any means overcome every- 
where and at all times the old sense of common interest 
of families, cliques, and friendships. Yet the example 
of the ten years and more of allegiance of the great 
majority of the Egyptians to Saad Zaghlul Pasha and to 
the Waf d has shown that, at all events in the presence of 
a great and unselfish leading personality, the national 
idea can bring the peoples of the Near East, like other 
peoples, to a unity rare in history and to the subordination 
of all personal and party interests. On the other hand, 
the awakening of national consciousness has often led to 
an exaggerated self-confidence, and has thus interfered 
with the due realization of the extent to which the 
Oriental peoples have still to gain a deeper understanding 
of the forces of modern civilization, of the elements of 
citizenship, to gain technical efficiency and to learn 
economic discipline, before they can become active and 
equal partners in the general complex of civilization. The 
countries of the Near East still offer a wide field for 
European assistance and advice in economic and state 
organization and education. 

But the first condition of this must be that this help 
is not offered from selfish motives arming at political or 
economic control, but from genuine readiness to be of 
service. The Oriental was never so suspicious as to-day. 
All the disguises of self -seeking under the cloak of man- 
dates, all the hollow talk of furthering the prosperity and 
progress of the backward peoples as a sacred mission of 
civilization, that is to say of the stronger civilized nations, 
only go to strengthen the suspicion, and to magnify the 
mistakes made in the Near East instead of minimizing 
them. One of the strongest reasons advanced for the 
effort of the Oriental peoples to achieve full independence 
lies in the fact that it is only on that condition that they 
are willing to accept the help of the West, that it is only 
when that has been achieved that there can be any question 
of real assistance. Experience has shown that indepen- 
dence is an essential condition for any thorough-going 



164 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

economic and cultural advance, for the European- 
ization and modernization of the native economic system 
in the interest of the native peoples. Given that condition, 
fear and suspicion can gradually fade in the hearts of the 
Orientals, the mental and moral inadequacies resulting 
from centuries of oppression, undernourishment, and 
ignorance, can be lessened and removed by steady and 
persistent educative work, and the old civilized countries 
of the Near East, once the cradle of culture and the 
centre of world trade, can once more enter fully into 
the community of civilized nations. 

CTTBBENCY PROBLEMS 

Two currency problems faced the countries of the Near 
East after the world war in their commercial relations 
with the world currency vassalage, and the fall in the 
price of silver. Currency vassalage, a symptom of the 
economic weakness of these countries and of their lack of 
capital, showed itself in one of two ways either through 
the currency unit being tied to that of an economically 
stronger country, or through the right of bank note issue 
belonging to a private banking institute entirely or mainly 
under foreign control. Often both conditions are found 
together. Thus the Egyptian, Palestinian, and Iraqi 
currencies are in a state of vassalage towards sterling, and 
the Syrian towards the French franc. The principal 
foreign commercial banks which have had the right of 
note issue are the National Bank of Egypt, the Banque 
Lnp&riale Ottomane, and the Imperial Bank of Persia. 
The National Bank of Egypt, with a share capital of 
E3,000,000 under British control, has possessed since 
June 25th, 1898, the monopoly of the issue of bank notes 
in Egypt. Before the world war this privilege was of no 
great value, as gold coin was in free circulation and the 
bank notes had to have a 50 per cent, gold cover. Up to 
the outbreak of war the bank note circulation scarcely 
exceeded E2,500,000. On the outbreak of war the cur- 
rency was pegged, and the decree of October 30th, 1916, 



OF WORLD ECONOMICS 165 

made fundamental changes. The obligation of pay- 
ment in gold and the obligation of gold cover were 
removed ; British state securities were permitted as cover 
instead of gold. This established the currency vassalage 
of the Egyptian pound, which, once it was taken off the 
gold basis, followed every fluctuation of sterling. After 
the abandonment of the gold standard in England in the 
autumn of 1931, efforts were made in Egypt to break 
away from this currency vassalage and to create an 
independent Egyptian currency, but in view of the 
intimate economic relations between the two countries 
the Egyptian Ministry shelved the plan. 

The Banque Imp6riale Ottomane was established in 
1863 by an Anglo-French banking consortium, with the 
privilege of note issue. Its privilege was renewed in 1925 
up to March 1st, 1936, the name of the bank being altered 
to Banque Ottomane. The national government in 
Turkey set up a number of commercial banks for the 
promotion of Turkish industry, and to enable the control 
of Turkish trade to be transferred into Turkish hands ; 
and in January 1932, the Turkish State Bank was 
founded with a capital of T15,000,000. The State 
Bank is gradually to increase its gold reserve, so that this 
reserve, together with the holding of gold bills, may give 
the necessary cover for the Turkish bank notes in cir- 
culation from 1936 onwards. 

The branches of the Ottoman Bank in the Erench 
mandated territory were constituted the Banque de Syrie 
et du Liban in 1919, with a share capital of 10,000,000 
francs ; on April 1st, 1924, the bank received the privilege 
of nobe issue for fifteen years. 

The development in Persia is also characteristic. The 
Imperial Bank of Persia, under British control, with a 
share capital of 650,000, received its original concession 
as a note issue bank in 1889 ; the concession was pro- 
longed in 1924 for a further twenty-five years. " Before 
the War the whole of the country's banking system was 
dependent on foreigners and served (their) economic 
expansion. The new men in Persia therefore directed 



166 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

their efforts from the first to recovering national 

independence in this field also." In 1928 the Persian 

National Bank was founded with a share capital of 

2,000,000 toman. The first governor of the bank was the 

German Dr Kurt Lindenblatt. " The National Bank, 

which has worked with great success, is likely in the course 

of years to secure for the Persian government the 

independence it desires in banking as elsewhere. It is 

proposed also to establish an agrarian bank to grant 

mortgages and therewith to facilitate the modernization 

of agriculture. The European banks are mainly devoted 

to financing foreign trade, and so do not assist the 

industrialization of the country. It is the task of the 

National Bank to promote industrialization." (Fritz 

Hesse.) The Iranian government has bought up the note 

issuing privilege of the Imperial Bank of Persia and has 

transferred it to the National Bank. This transfer " was 

regarded by the Iranians as one of the most important 

steps along the road to financial independence". So in 

every country the efforts are increasing to follow up the 

achievement of political independence with that of 

economic and currency independence. Often these 

efforts go hand in hand with attempts at currency 

stabilization, which, especially in the countries with 

a currency on a silver basis, has become an urgent 

necessity owing to the extraordinary fall in the price of 

silver. 

Since 1928 silver has lost more than half its value, 
measured in gold. Between 1835 and 1875 the price of 
silver had averaged 1-30 dollars an ounce in New York. 
Then, owing to the introduction of the gold currency by 
the Latin Monetary Union and the United States, it lost 
about half its value. It remained at this level, with only 
slight variations, until the world war, in the course of 
which it rose greatly in price,, reaching a top 'quotation 
in New York of 1-388 dollars towards the end of 1919. 
It then became stabilized once more, from 1921 to 1928, 
at the same level as at the end of the nineteenth century ; 
it was still worth 0-58 dollar in 1928. But from the 



OF WORLD ECONOMICS 167 

spring of 1929 it fell incessantly, until on February 16th, 
1931, the ounce was worth only 0-25 dollar in New 
York. 

As in other wide regions of Asia, silver was the basis 
of the currency in Arabia and in Persia. In Arabia, as in 
Abyssinia, the standard coin had for 170 years been 
the Maria Theresa dollar, which had first been minted 
in 1751 by the Vienna Mint. As recently as 1927 the 
Vienna Mint struck 15,561,000 dollars for circulation 
in these countries. In 1929 the figure fell to 2,846,000. 
The depreciation of silver led Persia to go over to a 
gold currency and to carry out a fundamental reform 
of the currency at the end of 1931. The Hedjaz also 
has gone over to a currency based on gold. Thus the 
same process has been going on in regard to the currency 
in the Near East as everywhere else. In the nineteenth 
century silver had been a general basis of currencies until 
the highly industrialized capitalist countries of the West 
went over to the gold standard. Many of the eastern 
countries remained on the silver standard, and are only 
now, with their active entry into world trade, following 
the western example. At the same time they are trying 
to liberate their currencies from foreign tutelage, and to 
bring their commercial banking system and their currency 
system under national control. 



OIL 

Like its cotton, the oil of the Levant has involved it in 
the great world struggle for raw material sources. 
Petroleum was known to the ancients Herodotus men- 
tions oil springs in the neighbourhood of Babylon, and 
Plutarch mentions springs at Kirkuk but petroleum 
working first began on a commercial scale in the fifties of 
the last century. Ty* the eighty years which have passed 
since then the oil industry has changed the economic face 
of the world. The United States was the first country 
to start an oil industry, and it still produces some 



168 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 
70 per cent, of the total world supply. The production 
in the United States has grown as follows : 

Tear. Barrels. 

1859 2,000 

1879 19,914,146 

1899 57,084,428 

1906 126,493,936 

1923 732,407,000 

1929 1,007,300,000 

1934 908,100,000 

The industry has grown correspondingly all over the 
world. Petroleum was originally used only for lighting ; 
now it is mainly and increasingly used for power produc- 
tion. This, in the age of machinery and motors, has 
brought oil into the world economic struggle as its decisive 
factor, taking the place of coal ; for anyone who has 
control of power-producing material has control of power. 
England's monopoly position a century ago as the ruling 
industrial power was based on her coal resources, and 
particularly on their remarkably favourable situation in 
the neighbourhood of ports and trade routes. With 
the coining of the new source of energy, the struggle for oil 
became one of the principal factors in world politics. The 
United States, the greatest oil consumer, had within their 
frontiers nearly three-quarters of the world production. 
Great Britain, who came next as an oil consumer, had 
within her empire at the outbreak of the world war barely 
two per cent, of the world's oil production* The principal 
oil cotmtries after the United States Mexico, Russia, 
Persia, the Dutch Indies, Roumania and Venezuela- 
were all outside the political control of the British Empire, 
although British oil companies owned oilfields in all 
quarters. Thus it became vital to the maintenance of 
Great Britain's power that she should increase her source 
of supply of crude oil, should discover oilfields that could 
be brought under her immediate control, and simuk 
taaeously, should bring within her control the transport 
oi pUfrom the fields to favourably situated ports. Oil has 



OF WORLD ECONOMICS 



169 



the great advantage over coal that it can be more rapidly 
and more cheaply mobilized from territories difficult of 
access through a pipeline than the more expensive and less 
easily transported coal, with its need of railways. Hither- 
to coaling stations had been of critical importance to the 
command of the seas ; now they shared their importance 
with oil-bunkering stations, which had to be placed at 
suitable points for ocean traffic in order, in conjunction 
with oil tankers, to safeguard the supply of oil for ship's 
engines, and especially, in time of emergency, for warships. 
The world extraction of petroleum in 1934 reached 
once more the record figure of 1929 of about 1,500,000,000 
barrels. The development of the extraction of crude 
petroleum in the principal producing countries of the world 
has been as follows : 



Year. 


United 
States. 


Soviet 
Union. 


Venezuela. 


Roumania. 


Iran. 


Mexico. 


Dutch 
Indies. 


1910 


209 


70 


__ 


9 





3 


11 


1920 


442 


25 





7 


12 


157 


17 


1925 


763 


52 


19 


16 


35 


115 


21 


1930 


898 


135 


136 


42 


45 


39 


41 


1931 


851 


162 


116 


49 


44 


33 


35 


1932 


785 


154 


116 


53 


49 


32 


39 


1933 


905 


154 


117 


54 


54 


34 


42 


1934 


908 


168 


142 


62 


52 


38 


42 



(Millions of barrels.) 

But geographical distribution alone does not determine 
the ownership of oil. The oil in the United States bglongs 
not only to American but largely to British companies. 
Only in the Soviet Union and in some of the South American 
states is the oil supply nationalized ; everywhere else it 
belongs to private and often to foreign companies. Two 
enormously powerful trusts are competing with one 
another for oil supplies the American groups, represented 
above all by the Standard Oil Company, headed by John 
D. Rockefeller, and the British companies, the (Anglo- 
Dutch) Royal Dutch Shell Trust, headed by Six Henri 
Deterding, and the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, part of the 
capital of which is directly owned by the British govern- 
ment. The Royal Dutch Shell Trust came into being in 



170 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

1911 through the fusion of the Koninklijke Nederlandsche 
Petroleum Maatschappij with the Shell Transport and 
Trading Company. These two great trusts are in com- 
petition both for markets and for sources of supply. Tlie 
struggle for markets has very little to do with the countries 
of the Levant, which, with their poverty, backwardness 
and sparse population, consume relatively little oil. But 
these countries come into the foreground in the struggle 
for oil sources between the American and British companies, 
supported on both sides by their states. 

This struggle is rendered more acute by the fact that 
the known oil deposits of the world are limited ; the 
estimates vary but are all within a maximum of some fifty 
years' supply at the present rate of consumption. It is 
calculated that the United States, which account to-day 
for about two-thirds of the world's oil yield, have little 
more than one-eighth of the world's oil resources, so that 
their reserves will soon be exhausted. The deposits in the 
Iranian and Iraqi oilfield are believed to be not much less, 
but they are being worked at a far slower rate, at which it 
is estimated that they will last more than two centuries. 
The battle for oil resources is thus concerned less with 
present extraction than with the provision of reserves for 
the future. In this field the British oil interests have once 
more shown themselves more far-sighted and enterprising 
than all the rest. The British were very successful in the 
acquisition of foreign oilfields, they husbanded their own 
reserves, and they have brought within their possession a 
large part of the remaining world resources. 

There was a particularly tough battle between the 
British and the American oil interests in the Levant. The 
struggle began at the outset of the present century ; it 
continued for years after the world war and determined 
the distribution of Mandates and the international policy 
in the Arab and Kurd territories of the Ottoman empire. 
America had renounced all gains from the war, all annexa- 
tions and reparation payments, in Europe ; but she de- 
manded her share in the gains from the war in the Levant. 
At the back of the bitter struggles between the victors in 



OF WORLD ECONOMICS 171 

the world war for territory in the Levant stood the struggle 
for oil. It was inevitable that Great Britain should regard 
the penetration of foreign and especially of American oil 
interests into the territories, so important to the Empire, 
around the Suez Canal and the Persian Gulf as a particu- 
larly serious menace. Great as is the importance of 
oil in peace time, it is still greater in war. Consequently 
it is not enough to possess oil sources ; it is necessary 
to have political and strategic control of them, and the 
means of drawing upon them. 

In addition to the great petroleum fields in Iran 
and Iraq, there is oil in the Red Sea region. Egypt 
has three oilfields on the coast of the Gulf of Suez ; 
the oldest one has been worked since 1907 and the most 
important one, Hurghada, since 1914. The fields belong 
to the Anglo-Egyptian Oilfields Company, formed in 
London in 1911 with a capital of 1,808,000. Output 
has been growing in recent years* In 1929 279,607 
tons of crude oil were extracted. Of this something 
over 78,000 tons were consumed in Egypt and the rest 
exported. The company possesses a refinery at Suez ; 
in 1929 the dividend paid was 22 per cent. In 
Palestine geologists had been prospecting for petroleum 
before the war in the service of the Standard Oil Company. 
After the war there were years of conflict between the 
British administration of the country and the American 
oil company, which so far has been unable to resume 
its exploration on any important scale. 

The struggle between the British and American oil 
companies began in the Levant about the turn of the 
century. At that time the American Admiral Colby 
M. Chester came to Constantinople and tried to secure 
railway and oil concessions in Anatolia and Mesopotamia. 
More fortunate was the Australian engineer William 
d'Arcy, who obtained from the Shah of Persia in 1901 
the monopoly for all Persian provinces with the exception 
of the five northern ones along the Caspian. This 
concession was granted for sixty years for the sum of 
40,000 dollars. The Anglo-Persian Oil Company (now 



172 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company) was founded, originally 
as a subsidiary of the Burma Oil Company, to work the 
concession. Since then it has extended its activity to 
many other countries. The British government acquired 
a majority of its shares, so that it has become virtually 
a British government undertaking. The purchase was 
made at the instance of Mr Winston Churchill, who 
at the time was First Lord of the Admiralty. In laying 
his Bill before the House of Commons in June 1914 he 
was moved by much the same sort of consideration as 
Beaconsfield had been in his purchase of the Suez 
Canal shares. He wanted to safeguard the oil supply 
of the British navy. 

The oilfields lie in the south-west of Iran, north of 
Dizful and east of Ahwaz. Dizful and Ahwaz are now 
connected by a railway which goes on to the new port 
of Bandar Shapur the first section of the great trans- 
Iranian railway. Bandar Shapur is a port newly laid 
out in a small sheltered bight at the northern end of 
the Persian Gulf. The Iranian government refused to 
carry the railway on to the more important town of 
Mohammerah, on the Iranian side of the Shatt-el-Arab : 
it was much too close to the British influence centred 
in Basra. The pipe-line from the oilfields of the Anglo- 
Iranian Oil Company leads, however, from the main 
field at Maidan i Naftun to Abadan, not far from 
Mohammerah, on the Iranian banks of the Shatt-el- 
Arab. At Abadan there are large storage tanks and 
the company's refinery. From here the oil is shipped 
through the Persian Gulf. Abadan lies between Basra 
and Fao. Not far from Basra, about 140 kilometres 
from the Persian Gulf, the Euphrates and Tigris join 
to form the Shatt-el-Arab. Basra before the world 
war was a shallow roadstead, difficult of access for sea- 
going vessels. During the war, when Great Britain was 
landing her troops there for the Mesopotamian cam- 
paign, Basra was developed into a modern port. With 
the aid of a loan issue of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company 
a ship canal was dredged; by its completion at the 



OF WORLD ECONOMICS 173 

end of 1930 the Shatt-el-Arab was made accessible 
through its whole length to ocean-going ships. 

Fao was a Turkish fortress at the point where the 
Shatt-el-Arab flows into the Persian Gulf. Immediately 
after Great Britain's declaration of war on Turkey, on 
November 7th, 1914, British and Indian troops captured 
the fortress, and on the 21st they took Basra. The 
declared purpose of the British in the Mesopotamian 
campaign was the protection of the oil plant of the Anglo- 
Persian Oil Company and the occupation of the Shatt-el- 
Arab throughout its course. For some time the British 
thought it would suffice to dominate southern Meso- 
potamia ; later on the recognition of the importance of the 
oil sources in the mountain country of northern Meso- 
potamia, and of the strategic importance of that mountain 
country for the defence of the southern lowlands, induced 
them to occupy the whole of Iraq. Thus Abadan lies 
on Iranian soil, but is directly controlled by whoever 
dominates the Shatt-el-Arab. Abadan is also the 
principal port on the Shatt-el-Arab. In 1930 the arrivals 
in the port of Basra were 177 vessels with a total tonnage 
of 799,000 ; at Abadan, 643 vessels, of tonnage 3,578,000. 
In the treaty of alliance of June 30th, 1930, between 
Great Britain and Iraq, Iraq binds herself to convey to 
Great Britain for the duration of the alliance, that is for 
twenty-five years after its ratification, an airport in 
or near Basra, and to permit its garrisoning by 
British troops. The port of Basra is under an adminis- 
trative authority in which Great Britain and Iraq are 
represented. 

Thus Basra, like Haifa, is important in two ways to 
the British Empire ; both are strategic points on the route 
to India ; Basra is of strategic importance for the protec- 
tion of the Anglo-Iranian pipe-line, and Haifa for the 
protection of the pipe-line conveying Anglo-Iraqi 
petroleum from Mosul to the Mediterranean. But already 
there is associated with the Haifa-Baghdad line a still 
bolder plan, which depends on the attainment of more 
far-reaching security in the Arabian peninsula through 



174 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

co-operation with Ibn Sand. From Kuweit, the originally 
intended terminus of the Baghdad Railway on the 
Persian Gulf, a British railway is to be laid to Akaba on 
the Red Sea, and the Anglo-Iranian oil is to be led to the 
Mediterranean through pipe-lines, either to Haifa or to 
Akaba* 

There has been rapid growth in recent years in the 
output of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company. The output 
in 1912 was 80,000 tons, in 1929 5,700,000 tons, and in 
1934 7,650,000 tons. The oil yield is also of the utmost 
economic importance to Iran. Oil accounts for more than 
half of the Persian exports and gives Iran a large credit 
balance of foreign trade. In 1929 the company paid the 
Persian government 1,250,000 in dues, about one-sixth 
of the Persian state revenue. In the following years, 
in consequence of the fall in petroleum prices and the 
restriction of output by the Anglo-Persian, its payment fell 
to some 300,000. In an agreement of August 1932, it 
was provided that the company should pay the Persian 
government at least 1,250,000 a year. But at the end 
of 1932 the Persian government terminated the concession. 
It was of the opinion that the concession granted in 
Persia in 1901, under entirely different circumstances 
and without regard to the most important national 
interests of the country, by a powerless and corrupt 
government, could no longer be maintained under the new 
conditions by an Iran (as Persia now calls herself) actively 
engaged in modernizing her country. The government 
has also introduced amendments into the new con- 
cession agreement which correspond to the transformation 
which is taking place in every field in Iran as in Turkey. 
The aim of the Iranian government is to make the great 
plant of the Anglo-Iranian in south-west Iran, under the 
joint control of the Iranian government an important 
factor in the industrial training and modernization of the 
region and its inhabitants. 

The new concession was signed at Teheran on 
April 30th, 1933, for a period of sixty years. Under this 
new agreement the concession area was reduced from the 



OF WORLD ECONOMICS 175 

original 500,000 square miles, which. William Knox 
d'Arcy secured tinder his concession of 1901 for a sum 
of 4,000, to 250,000 square miles and from 1938 to 100,000 
square miles. A low price was fixed for oil sold in Iran, 
as cheap oil is of importance for the modernization of 
agriculture and of transport. The Iranian government 
is to be given a discount of 25 per cent, and Iranian 
nationals of 10 per cent, on the price fixed. The Company 
is required progressively to replace all its foreign employees 
by Iranians, and to spend 10,000 a year on the education 
of Iranians in Great Britain in engineering and research 
connected with the oil industry. The Company is to pay 
the Iranian government taxes amounting to 225,000 
a year for fifteen years and 300,000 a year for a further 
fifteen years. Finally the government is to receive a 
royalty of four shillings gold for every ton of crude oil 
extracted, and 20 per cent, of the net profits after the 
payment of a fixed sum to stockholders. 

In recent years both the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company 
(which has formed a subsidiary, the North Persian Oil 
Company, for the purpose) and the Standard Oil Trust 
have been in competition for the concession for borings 
in the five northern provinces of Iran, But their real 
field of battle was not Persia, whose principal oilfields 
had already been dealt with by the concession of May 
28th, 1901, to William Knox d'Arcy, but Mesopotamia, 
where the American Admiral Chester had had less success 
than d'Arcy had had in Persia. The concession area of 
the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company extends into Iraqi terri- 
tory, in consequence of the frontier regulation between 
Persia and Turkey in 1913. The oilfield of Naft Khana 
lies on the Iran-Iraqi frontier. On May 24th, 1926, the 
Anglo-Persian Oil Company concluded with the Iraqi 
government an agreement under which the concession, 
originally granted until 1961, was extended for a further 
thirty-five years until 1996. A subsidiary was formed 
under the name of the Khanaqin Oil Company ; a pipe- 
line was laid along the fifty kilometres from Naft Khana 
to the nearest railway station, Khanaqin, and in 1927 



176 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

a refinery was set up by the river Alwand. At present 
the Anglo-Iranian is extracting little oil in Iraq, for sale 
only within the country. The Basra district is supplied 
from the refinery at Abadan. Oil extraction on a large 
scale only began when the pipe-line from Iraq to Haifa 
had been laid. Thus the oil yield in this district did not 
approach the potential yield until 1935. The yield in 
1930 was 80,000 tons and in 1933, 122,000 tons, but in 
1934, the first year in which work really started, the yield 
reached 978,000 tons. During 1935 there were shipped 
from Haifa 1,823,426 tons of oil, and from Tripoli 1,625,773 
tons. The yield of Iraqi oil has considerably cheapened 
the supply in the country, and in view of the growing 
importation of motor pumps for irrigation and of motor 
cars the cheapening has been of considerable economic 
importance. 

The struggle for the oilfields of northern Mesopotamia 
has lasted a quarter of a century. After Admiral 
Chester's failure the Germans, who were busy at the time 
with negotiations concerning the Baghdad Railway 
concession, tried to secure oilfields in Mosul and Anatolia/ 
and so to make an end of Germany's dependence on foreign- 
companies, which was bound to be serious for her, especi- j 
ally in war time. (Germany's lack of oil deposits in her ' 
own territory was one of the main reasons for the efforts 
made by German chemists to produce synthetic spirit. 
If this process could be so cheapened as to enable the 
synthetic product to meet the commercial competition 
of natural petroleum, this would mean a further great 
revolution in the field of motor fuel supply, and would 
bring changes in the international situation in regard to 
economic policy,) The Sultan, and after him the Young 
Turks, refused for a long time to grant this important 
concession. Not until Great Britain and Germany 
united in 1912 to form the Turkish Petroleum Company 
was their joint political pressure at the Sublime Porte 
sufficient to compel the grant of the concession. Half 
of the shares were to be held by the Turkish National 
Bank, a British financial institution (its place was soon 



OF WORLD ECONOMICS 177 

taken by the Anglo-Persian Oil Company), a quarter 
by the Royal Dutch Shell group, and a quarter by the 
Deutsche Bank. 

After the world war Great Britain seemed to be mistress 
of the oil supplies of the Near East. With the ending of 
the German participation the Turkish Petroleum Com- 
pany had become purely British, and British troops were 
not only in occupation of southern Persia, but also of 
the north Persian provinces, whose oil resources were 
awaiting development. British troops had also pushed 
into Transcaspia and the Caucasus, where it was impor- 
tant for them not only to stave off the menace from the 
Russian Revolution but to obtain control of the rich 
oilfields of Baku. Not all these hopes attained fruition. 
North Persia and the former Russian territory had to 
be evacuated ; the Soviet Union has nationalized the 
oilfields by the Caspian and increased output by per- 
fecting the technique of extraction and rationalizing the 
industry ; and even the British monopoly of the Turkish 
Petroleum Company was broken down and foreign 
interests had to be granted shares in it. After 1919 
there began the struggle over the natural wealth belong- 
ing to the peoples of the Levant who had been " freed 
from the Turkish yoke ". Only the course of historic 
events prevented a similar struggle over the natural 
wealth of "liberated" peoples of the Soviet Union. 
The Treaty of San Remo envisaged both possibilities. 

France and the United States were competitors of 
Great Britain. The secret agreements concluded between 
France and Britain during the world war concerning the 
partition of Turkey in Asia had promised Mosul to the 
French as a sphere of influence. At the San Remo 
Conference of April 1920, in which the Asiatic spoils of 
the world war were shared out in various forms, as 
spheres of influence, Mandates, or concessions, France 
agreed to transfer Mosul and its oil to Great Britain in 
return for a 25 per cent, share in the Turkish Petroleum 
Company and for the recognition of the French Mandate 
over the whole of Syria, including even Damascus, which 



12 



178 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

was then under the rule of Britain's ally King Faisal. 
The agreement ran as follows : 

" In the territories which belonged to the late 
Russian Empire, the two Governments will give their 
joint support to their respective nationals in their 
joint efforts to obtain petroleum concessions and 
facilities to export, and to arrange deli very of petroleum 
supplies. . . . In the event of a private petroleum 
company being used to develop the Mesopotamian 
oilfields, the British Government will place at the 
disposal of the French Government a share of twenty- 
five per cent, in such company. ... It is under- 
stood that the said petroleum company shall be under 
permanent British control. . . . Should the 
private petroleum company be constituted as afore- 
said, the native Government or other native interests 
shall be allowed, if they so desire, to participate up to 
a maximum of twenty per cent, of the share capital 
of the said company." State Papers, 1920, p. 350. 

It was also stipulated in the agreement that pipe-lines 
should be laid from Persia (Iran) and from Iraq to the 
Mediterranean and should be carried through the French 
mandated territory to a Syrian port. This stipulation 
gave rise later to an Anglo-French dispute, as Great 
Britain decided to lay the pipe-line from Iraq to Haifa, 
in territory under its own administration. 

France appeared to be satisfied, but American oil 
interests claimed participation in the oil of Mesopotamia. 
Their demands were energetically pressed by the American 
government under President Harding, himself intimately 
associated with the American heavy industry and oil 
combines. His Cabinet included Albert B. Fall, who later, 
together with his business friends Harry F. Sinclair, the oil 
magnate, and Edward L. Doheny, was involved in the 
Teapot Dome scandal. The British government sent 
Sir John Cadman, the British negotiator at San Remo and 
one of the heads of the Anglo-Persian Oil Company, to 
Washington to try to win over the Standard Oil Company 



OF WORLD ECONOMICS 179 

by the offer of a 25 per cent, share in the Turkish 
Petroleum Company. 

The battle of the oil interests produced political 
.conflicts. The Americans had no direct territorial 
interests. They were fighting for the principle of the 
open door, which Henry U. Hopli has described as " the 
theory under which the economically stronger is enabled 
to exploit the economically weaker ". The Anglo- 
French conflict in the Levant was over territorial issues, 
and it did not at once abate in the years that followed. 
Great Britain felt that her route to India would not be 
secure unless she had possession also of the Syrian ports ; 
France had not forgotten her historic claims to Palestine 
and Mosul. And France in her turn had been taught 
by the world war how necessary it was to have reserves 
of petroleum. During the war she had been almost 
entirely dependent on American oil supplies. Immediately 
after the Armistice the French government founded the 
Compagnie Fra^aise des P6troles, to develop the French 
oilfields abroad, present and future. The Anglo-French 
conflict was disguised in 1921 in the form of a Turco-Greek 
war : as Ludwell Denny says in his We Fight for Oil, 
" France and Great Britain hit upon the idea of fighting 
one another through third parties." France supported 
Turkey and Great Britain the Greeks. After the defeat 
of the Greeks the British were afraid that France would 
support Turkey in her claims to the Mosul region. This 
led Britain to agree in 1923 to the French occupation of 
the Ruhr, in return for which France allowed Great 
Britain a free hand in the Mosul region. 

Mosul is important strategically as well as for its oil. 
The struggle for it between Great Britain and Turkey 
dragged on for more than two years. Not until Decem- 
ber 1925 did the League of Nations Council decide 
in favour of Great Britain. Turkey agreed to the 
frontier delimitation in June 1926, perhaps under the 
threat of an Italian attack on Asia Minor with British 
approval* Great Britain had won. It was true that 
she no longer had a monopoly in Iraq; French and 



180 INTEB-RELATIOJST AND IMPLICATIONS 

American interests had a share in its development. But 
she had a controlling majority ; under its statutes the 
company for the exploitation of the oilfields in Mosul, 
which changed its name to Iraq Petroleum Company, 
was a British company. An Armenian, Mr Gulbenkian, 
received 5 per cent, of the shares, the Anglo-Persian 
31-25 per cent., and the British Shell, the American 
group, and the lYench group 21 25 per cent. each. Thus 
Great Britain holds 52 5 per cent, of the shares. But the 
essential thing is that in the event of war this oil will be 
available for the British navy. 

On March 14th, 1925, a concession agreement was 
concluded between the Turkish Petroleum Company and 
the Iraqi government. The agreement runs for fifty-seven 
years, at the end of which the whole of the property of 
the company in Iraq comes into the possession of the 
state. The company was given the right to select within 
twenty-three months, on the strength of its experimental 
borings, twenty-four rectangular plots of land, each of 
eight square miles, in the districts of Mosul and Baghdad. 
The company had to undertake to carry out a fixed 
of borings each year, and to pay to the govern 



ment a fixed royalty for every ton of oil extracted. In 
the San Remo agreement it was originally provided that 
the indigenous government should receive 20 per cent. 
of the shares, but the Iraqi government failed to secure the 
fulfilment of this provision. The company bound itself 
to meet the requirements of Iraq in the first place, to 
employ as far as possible only Iraqis, and so far as possible 
to train Iraqis in the occupations for which there were not 
yet sufficient qualified indigenous workers. In all future 
share issues subscription lists were also to be opened in 
Iraq, and the Iraqis were to be given preference in the 
allotment of at least 20 per cent, of the new shares. The 
Iraqi government received the right to nominate a member 
of the board of directors. Under Article 32 of the 
concession agreement the Iraq Petroleum Company was 
to remain a British Company registered in Great Britain, 
was to have its head office within the British Empire, 



OF WORLD ECONOMICS 181 

and was at all times to have a British subject for its 
chairman. 

The company began its experimental borings in 1927, 
and as early as October of that year it found at Baba 
Gurgur, near Kirkuk, an extraordinarily rich gusher. 
Large installations were set up, roads built, pipe-lines 
laid, and workings developed which cost the company 
in all more than 4,000,000. The company only 
extracted, however, enough oil for its own needs ; com- 
mercial exploitation could only begin when transport was 
made possible by the completion of the pipe-line to the 
Mediterranean. With the fall in oil prices the British 
and American oil interests showed no great inclination 
to expedite the development of the Mosul oilfields ; it 
was more important to them to have reserves for years 
to come than to increase the sales in an already over- 
burdened market. 

The Compagnie Franaise des P^troles, on the other 
hand, was interested in obtaining as large an output of oil 
as soon as possible, in order to be made independent of 
imports by its own petroleum reserves. The Iraqi govern- 
ment was equally interested in an adequate output, as 
only that would provide it with substantial royalties, 
which it urgently needed for the development of Iraqi 
agriculture and industry. It put pressure on the Iraq 
Petroleum Company to select the fields it wanted as quickly 
as possible, so that the government should be able to give 
concessions to other companies for the remaining plots 
and so be able to increase the revenues of the state. The 
collapse of grain prices brought Iraq into a worse financial 
situation, and King Faisal took the opportunity of a 
journey in the summer of 1930 to get into touch with 
financiers in the European capitals and to pave the way 
for a settlement in regard to oil concessions that would be 
in his country's interest. The joint efforts of the French 
and Iraqi governments brought them a victory over the 
policy of making development depend on price move- 
ments and market conditions. On March 24th, 1931, a 
supplementary agreement was concluded between the 



182 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

Iraq Petroleum Company and the Iraqi government. 
Under this agreement the company received as its con- 
cession area all the land east of the Tigris in the provinces 
of Baghdad and Mosul. The company bound itself to 
complete the pipe-line to the Mediterranean by December 
31st, 1935. This pipe-line was to be capable of conveying 
at least 3,000,000 tons a year. The company bound 
itself also to pay the Iraqi government a sum of 400,000 
in gold every year until regular export to the Mediter- 
ranean began, 200,000 of this being on account of future 
royalties in so far as these exceeded a certain minimum. 
After the opening of the pipe-line the company guarantees 
the government for a period of twenty years a royalty 
of four shillings gold per ton for a minimum annual output 
of 2,000,000 tons, that is to say, at least 400,000 a year. 
The pipe-line was completed well ahead of the stipulated 
time, and was opened in January 1935. The prices of 
petroleum products in Iraq have been substantially 
reduced ; oil fuel required for agricultural machinery 
and pumps is reduced in price by one-third. 

The San Bemo agreement originally envisaged tJtr^ 

pumping of oil from Iraq to a Syrian port,' but Grear^ 

Britain soon insisted in taking the pipe-line to the Bay of 

Acre, where in the event of war she had the exclusive 

right of use of all port plant. Great Britain also insisted 

in bringing the pipe-line entirely through territory under 

British military supervision. France, on the other hand, 

was naturally interested in bringing the petroleum to a 

port under her own military control. A compromise 

was finally effected through the active mediation of King 

Faisal, and preparations were able to be begun in 1931 

for the laying of the pipe-line. It runs from the oil region 

around Kirkuk across the Tigris to the Euphrates, which 

it crosses at Haditha. From there one branch crosses 

via Abu Kemal through Syria to Tripoli, and the other, 

which must convey at least 50 per cent, of the oil output, 

through Transjordania to the Bay of Acre. The Bay of 

Acre with the port of Haifa, and the Shatt-el-Arab from 

Basra to the Persian Gulf, will thus form in every respect 



OF WORLD ECONOMICS 183 

Great Britain's strategic bases in the Near East ; Haifa, 
on the Mediterranean, will also guard the Suez Canal, 
and thus outstrips Basra in importance. 

The work of leading the pipe-line through the desert 
has changed the aspect of the desert. Workmen's 
settlements have been built, machines of the most 
complicated sort brought in, drinking water provided, 
asphalt roads built, and telephone lines laid. Thousands 
of Bedouins have found work, though this has only been a 
temporary palliative for the impoverishment of the owners 
of the herds of camels through the arrival of the motor 

car. 

The definite settlement of the concession to the Iraq 
Petroleum Company gave the Iraqi government the 
opportunity of granting the concession for the oil deposits 
west of the Tigris, where the Iraq Petroleum Company 
had already had success with experimental borings near 
Kaijara, some sixty miles south of Mosul on the right 
bank of the Tigris. In 1932 the Iraqi government 
granted the concession to the British Oil Development 
Company, which, under British leadership, also represented 
German, Swiss, and Italian oil interests. The agreement 
resembles that with the Iraq Petroleum Company in 
providing substantial royalties for the government, requir- 
ing that the company shall always be a British company 
with a British chairman, and imposing on it the obligation, 
among others, of giving a number of suitable Iraqi 
students a training abroad at its own expense in geology 
and as petroleum technologists. 

In a few years' time Iraq wiJl become one of the most 
important petroleum countries of the world. The 
oilfields in southern Iran and northern Iraq, associated 
together and largely under unified control, will take the 
third or fourth place in the world's oil extraction. The 
pipe-lines to Abadan near Basra, to Haifa and to Tripoli, 
are making possible exportation from regions which in 
earlier times were difficult of access. Their situation by 
the Suez Canal and by the Persian Gulf increases the 
strategic importance of these oil supplies. 



184 WORLD ECONOMICS 

But oil extraction is also of more than merely fiscal 
importance to Iraq herself. She is concerning herself 
more and more for the gradual creation and advancement 
of an industrial working class in a country hitherto con- 
fined to peasants and nomads ; she is working in the 
direction of industrialization and the transformation of 
her economic system. Cotton and oil are the two great 
economic interests which have involved the countries 
of the Levant in the modern world economic system and 
thereby in world politics. But over and above them 
there is at work the ambition of their peoples for political 
and economic autonomy, an ambition which has filled 
their minds in consequence of their contact with Europe. 



INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS OF 
WORLD POLITICS 

ECONOMIC CONQUESTS 

THE characteristic feature of the age of Imperialism, and 
the basis of its conflicts, is the search for sources of raw 
materials and for markets of vast extent, and for strategic 
positions commanding the routes to them. But this is 
not all. The conflicts arise out of two contradictory 
sets of ambitions, whose course it determines the 
ambition of the great empires for expansion, and that of 
the smaller nations for independence. Since the time of 
Napoleon the country between the Bosphorus and the 
Indian Ocean, the Nile and the Caspian, has been one of 
the principal fields of tension in world politics. In 
execution of the aims of the French Revolution, the genius 
of Napoleon had brought to Europe from Cadiz to Moscow 
a new self-confidence, a sense of freedom and energy : 
he made an end of the fusty provinciality, the isolation 
and backwardness of Italy and Germany, and the con- 
ception of Europe, which had gained a footing in courts 
and among a small caste of aristocrats and men of learning 
in the era of the Enlightenment, became an active force 
in the life of the peoples. These processes extended, in 
a very dilute form, as far as the Levant. Napole6n's 
expeditions and missions to Egypt not only made the 
Egypt of his day directly acquainted with its immemorial 
civilizations, but also laid the foundation for the awaken- 
ing of modern Egypt which began under Mehemet Ali, the 
Albanian of humble origin who became an officer in the 
Turkish army and rose to be the founder of the dynasty 
that rules to this day in Egypt. Through Napoleon 
Egypt was brought within the field of the Anglo-French 
rivalry for the control of India and of the land route to 
India; and the rivalry over Egypt continued, though 

185 



186 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

for different reasons, until in 1904 King Edward VII 
arrived at an understanding with France, for which 
Egypt (and Morocco) had to pay. 

Napoleon's activities also brought Persia for the first 
time within the field of Anglo-Russian rivalries ; the 
rivalry over Persia continued in full force until 1907, 
when King Edward VII arrived at an understanding with 
Russia at Persia's expense. After Napoleon had failed 
in his plan of controlling the route to India through 
the conquest of Egypt and Syria, he tried in his struggle 
with England to strike through Persia, with Russia's 
help, at the heart of the second British Empire which 
was then beginning to grow. At the beginning of the 
nineteenth century French, English, and Russian missions 
were sent for the first time to Persia, to bring that 
country within the field of world politics. The result 
was a century of progressive weakening for Persia. 
Russia penetrated into the Caucasus and into central 
Asia, conquered Georgia and Azerbaijan, which had been 
Persian provinces, and weakened Persia's influence in 
central Asia. Great Britain protected Afghanistan, 
which formerly had been Persian territory, in its struggles 
against Persia, in order to preserve it as a bulwark against 
the advance of Russian influence through Persia ; she 
extended the frontiers of British Baluchistan at Persia's 
expense, and established her influence in the Persian 
Gulf and over the Bahrein Islands, which had once 
belonged to Persia. The country was even more fatally 
weakened by the economic penetration that began with 
the Russo-Persian Treaty of Turkmanchai (1828), which 
introduced the regime of capitulations into Persia and 
compelled the country to give Russia a free hand in 
commerce. 

While Napoleon's emergence in Europe roused the 
nations of Europe from their lethargy, it accelerated the 
process of decay and dissolution in which the countries 
and peoples of the Levant were involved. These countries 
were brought within the sphere of world policy in the 
nineteenth centurv, but, just as in the economic field. 



OF WORLD POLITICS 187 

only passively. It was a universal assumption in 
European policy that the states of the Near East were 
destined to be " liquidated ". Since, however, the 
interests of the European Powers conflicted, the essence 
of the Near East question consisted in carrying through 
this liquidation if possible without endangering world 
peace, and with due regard to the interests of each 
individual Power. It was not by their own strength and 
not by virtue of any national will to self-preservation that 
the Ottoman empire and Persia continued in existence 
during the nineteenth century, but through the conflict 
of interests of the European Powers. But it was a 
precarious existence. The formal independence of these 
countries was robbed of all reality by complete financial 
and economic dependence. Scarcely anywhere was the 
influence of foreign capital greater than in Turkey, Egypt, 
and Persia. In this respect the histories of these three 
states were identical ; they were repeated in a slightly 
milder form in China and South America. The 
extravagance of princes free of all popular control, not 
seldom encouraged and exploited by Europeans, resulted 
in their acceptance of a steady succession of loans, which, 
being applied to unproductive purposes, rapidly swelled 
the burden of state debt into disastrous proportions. 
The loan service itself necessitated the acceptance of new 
loans, the grant of which was made subject to the grant 
in return of economic concessions, especially for the 
building of railways, the development of water power, and 
the exploitation of mineral wealth. The political power 
of the various states was brought to the support of their 
nationals in this hunt for concessions. The corrupt 
Oriental officials were tempted to more and more serious 
neglect of their duties toward their own country. The 
system of loans and concessions led not only to the 
exploitation of the countries in the interest of European 
capitalism, but to the further increase of corruption and 
of the internal weakness of the Oriental administrations. 
It is true that some of these enterprises and concessions 
assisted in the development of indigenous economic 



188 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

resources, but this was only an incidental and chance 
result ; the immediate purpose was the economic advan- 
tage of the European Power, which also, through its 
financial and capitalistic domination, secured political 
control. The countries quickly became bankrupt, and 
their financial administration was taken over by the 
European creditors* In Egypt the Caisse de la Dette 
Publique was set up in 1876. In December 1881, the 
Administration of the Ottoman Public Debt was con- 
stituted in Turkey ; it had seven members, six represent- 
ing the European creditors and one the Banque Imp6riale 
Ottomane; the Turkish representative was appointed 
only in an advisory capacity. 

The Treaty of Sevres of August 10th, 1920, envisaged 
the setting up of a Financial Commission, to consist of a 
French, a British, and an Italian member, to control the 
whole financial and economic life of the state. The annual 
Budget was to be laid before it and only to be presented 
to the Turkish Parliament in the form approved by it ; 
the Parliament was to make no changes in the approved 
Budget without the assent of the Commission. The 
Commission was to supervise the administration of the 
Budget and of all financial legislation in Turkey. To 
this end the Turkish financial inspectorate was directly 
subordinated to the Commission, whose assent was 
required to the appointment of members of the inspec- 
torate. The assent of the Commission was required for all 
external or internal loans, and all Turkish sources of 
revenue were placed at its disposal, as the Commission 
alone was to take measures for developing the economic 
potentialities of the country. The Turkish government 
was to grant no concession either to a Turkish national 
or to a foreigner without the assent of the Financial 
Commission. The Administration of the Q|toman 
Public Debt was to continue in office, but the Russian, 
German, and Austro-Hungarian representatives were 
excluded, leaving only those of France, Great Britain, and 
Italy. The Customs administration was to be entrusted 
to a Director General who was to be appointed by the 



WORLD POLITICS 189 

Financial Commission and to be subject to dismissal by 
it, and no change was to be made in tariff rates without 
the approval of the Financial Commission, 

In the Treaty of Sevres, which was never ratified, the 
control of Oriental states by foreign capital and its interests 
reached the theoretical maximum ambition of the 
European Powers, an ambition they were never able to 
carry into practice on such a scale. This past experience 
makes intelligible the aversion of Turkey and Persia to 
the acceptance of foreign loans since they have won their 
independence. They have preferred to put up with 
delays in carrying out important economic reforms and 
public works rather than incur the risk of falling again 
into economic tutelage. Next to the Soviet Union, 
Turkey and Persia have given the strongest evidence of 
their determination to preserve their independence by 
definitely emancipating themselves from the position of 
semi-colonial countries serving European economic 
interests. 

There are plenty of semi-colonial countries economi- 
cally dependent on foreign capital outside the Orient. The 
special feature in the East was that this dependence was 
clinched and reinforced by the system of capitulations, 
which not only secured to foreign capital and its holders 
freedom from taxation and placed them under courts 
of justice of their own, but prevented the economic and 
social development of the country and its administrative 
and juridical modernization. A special means of sub- 
jecting Oriental trade and industry to the domination of 
European and American capitalism was provided by the 
tariff legislation. Under this Turkey was only permitted 
to levy a uniform fiscal duty on imports of 8 per cent, 
ad valorem. She was not permitted to make any sort of 
differeiriiation between different categories of goods or 
countries of origin. European industry had in Turkey 
a permanently open market, an international free trade 
area at the service of foreign capital, while Turkish 
production could enjoy no protection either through 
tariffs or through treaties with particular states. When 



190 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

the Turkish government wanted to raise the general 
rate of duty from 8 to 12 per cent., in order to increase 
its revenue, it had to purchase the assent of the 
Powers by a series of valuable concessions and heavy 
sacrifices. 

Even after the world wax the European Powers hoped 
to be able to retain their old position of advantage in the 
Near East ; they were ready to agree to a relaxation of 
the capitulations, the misuse of which, they were unable 
to deny, had often been carried to grotesque lengths ; 
but they regarded the abolition of capitulations as 
impossible. In the Treaty of Lausanne in 1923 Turkey 
insisted on the complete abolition of capitulations, and 
Persia denounced them in 1928 without meeting with any 
serious resistance. Egypt secured tariff independence in 
1929, but the capitulations continue in full force. The 
desire for the maintenance of capitulations, which are in 
the interest of the foreigners and not in that of the native 
population, finds very significant expression in the League 
of Nations Mandates, which may serve as an interesting 
type of camouflage and paraphrasing of the methods of 
imposing colonial status familiar in the' Near East in the 
century before the world war, bringing them up to date 
or at least up to the date of the immediate post-war 
period. According to the Covenant the well-being and 
the development of native peoples is a sacred task of 
civilization, but nevertheless the interests of foreigners 
and of foreign capital are given first consideration. Thus 
until 1935 Palestine was entirely under British adminis- 
tration, and had no native authorities against whose 
" corruption " or " incompetence " the foreigner might 
need special protection ; yet the foreigner in Palestine 
was better situated in many ways than the native, as he 
still is in Syria. The capitulations are formally suspended 
for the period of the Mandate ; but the statute of the 
Mandate (which, of course, was created in order to train 
the country, which is "not yet entirely ripe ", until it 
reaches a cultural and social level at which it could take 
its place on terms of equality in the modern world) 



OF WORLD POLITICS 191 

contains this provision in regard to the event of the 
termination of the Mandate : 

" Unless the Powers whose nationals enjoyed the 
aforementioned privileges and immunities on August 
1st, 1914, shall have previously renounced the right 
to their re-establishment, or shall have agreed to their 
non-application for a specified period, these privileges 
and immunities shall at the expiration of the mandate 
be immediately re-established in their entirety or with 
such modifications as may have been agreed upon 
between the Powers concerned/ 9 

The old Ottoman empire collapsed long ago, the 
Turkish Republic has swept away the last vestige of the 
capitulations, but the League Mandate serves to maintain 
" in their entirety " the principles of this system, described 
by so many observers as an abuse, if the interest of the 
Powers demands it and if the Powers so determine. 

But the Mandate not only maintains the obsolete 
system of the capitulations for an indefinite period in the 
interest of the Powers; it also, in the interest of the 
Powers, restricts the fiscal sovereignty of the mandated 
territories. The Mandates for Palestine and Syria lay 
down that " there shall be no discrimination in Palestine 
against goods originating in or destined for any " State 
Member of the League of Nations. These two countries 
are thus prevented from negotiating mutual tariff 
privileges, quotas, and so on. All States Members of the 
League of Nations enjoy most-favoured-nation conditions 
in mandated territories,' without such territories being 
permitted to claim a corresponding advantage. Instead 
of promoting the economic progress of the mandated 
territory, which should be the purpose of the Mandate, 
the " sacred task of civilization ", the lack of complete 
tariff sovereignty restricts the economic activities of the 
mandated territory in favour of the importing countries. 

POIJTICAL TENSIONS 

Ultimately the interests of six Powers came into 
competition in the international arena of the Levant. It 



192 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

was Austria and Russia who originally, in the eighteenth 
century, brought to an end the victorious advance of the 
Ottoman power in central and south-eastern Europe and 
loosened Turkey's hold of her European possessions. 
Austria's attention, however, was soon diverted from 
the Turkish scene ; so long as her rulers wore the German 
imperial crown or she belonged to the German Confedera- 
tion, Austria's interests lay in the west. Only after 1866 
did she seek compensation for her losses in the west 
through an extension of her influence toward the south- 
east. This necessarily brought her into conflict with 
Russia, who since the time of Peter the Great had regarded 
the Balkans, where peoples allied to her in faith and race 
were living under Turkish rule, as her own field of expan- 
sion. For Russia the possession of the Bosphorus and 
the Dardanelles would have broken down the barrier that 
isolated her from the ocean. In the north she possessed 
only inadequate ports, ice-bound during the winter; 
the natural outlet for the south of Russia with its great 
exports of grain was the Black Sea, but this remained 
an inland sea so long as its one narrow outlet was not 
under Russian control. Constantinople, however, was 
more than the object of economic ambitions ; it was the 
romantic dream of the Russian people, its Church, and its 
Tsar. Only in Constantinople would they be able to feel 
that they had won the full spiritual self -integration which 
united them with the cultural development of centuries, 
and the undertaking and consummating of which they 
regarded as their mission. Thus for the Russians the 
Bosphorus was a strategic, an economic, and a spiritual 
desideratum. While Austria-Hungary contented herself 
with influence in the Balkans, Russia's ambition went 
much farther ; she wanted the break-up of Turkey and 
the final expulsion of that state from Europe and from 
the Straits ; she wanted to restore the Byzantine empire, 
regarding herself ate its true heir. 

In the nineteenth century Russia had a rival in this 
ambition : a rival, indeed, who hardly counted politically 
Greece, who was consumed by the " great idea " of the 



OF WORLD POLITICS 193 

liberation of Thrace and Constantinople, the Aegean 
Islands and Asia Minor, the southern shores of the Black 
Sea, and Cyprus, and of their re-union in the glory of the 
Pan-Hellenic past and future. But Russia pushed on 
not only west but east of the Black Sea ; she climbed 
over the Caucasus, where she came into conflict with 
Persia and Turkey, and she found south of the Caucasus 
a Christian people under the dominion of the Turks and 
in need of liberation the Armenians. Southward from 
the Caucasus, and later through the steppes of central 
Asia, the way seemed to open for her to the Persian 
Gulf, and to the Indian Ocean, in rounding off her 
continually growing Asiatic possessions. 

While Russia thus became the great adversary of 
Turkey in the nineteenth century, Great Britain had 
little interest in Turkey herself. All that was of economic 
importance was the cotton cultivation in Egypt ; scarcely 
a thought was given in the nineteenth century to the oil 
deposits of Persia and Iraq. For Great Britain the 
Ottoman empire and Egypt were of importance as transit 
countries between Europe and southern Asia ; her policy 
was dictated by the fear of a closing of the route to 
India. She sought to prepare the way for the creation 
and safeguarding of a land connection with India. Great 
Britain's policy in the nineteenth century was directed 
to the preservation of Turkey ; in this she was also con- 
cerned for her seventy million Mohammedan subjects 
in India, who represented there the best support of 
British role against the growing unrest of the Hindus. 
On the other hand, Great Britain could not permit Turkey 
to grow stronger. A weak Turkey on the route to India 
mattered little, while any other Power in possession in 
her place of important regions of Asia Minor might be a 
very serious obstacle. The " Sick Man " was to be kept 
alive, but must not be allowed to get well. 

As with Turkey, so with Persia : Great Britain was 
interested in her preservation, but not in any increase in 
her strength. Persia and Afghanistan were necessary to 
Great Britain as buffer states between India and Russian 

13 



194 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

penetration from tlie north. The safeguarding of India 
was served by the transformation of the Indian Ocean 
and its two approaches, the Red Sea and the Persian 
Gulf, into British waters, surrounded on all sides by 
British possessions or spheres of influence. The Red Sea 
was enclosed through the possession of the Sinai peninsula 
and of Aden ; this process was completed in recent years 
through the acquisition of Akaba. The Persian Gulf, 
which has only two good ports, Kuweit and Muscat, was 
converted into a British sphere of influence even more 
thoroughly than the Red Sea, which has remained an 
international traffic route ; British governments have 
repeatedly emphasized Great Britain's special strategic, 
political, and economic interests in the Persian Gulf. 
This policy was given its most decided expression in the 
declaration of the British government of May 5th, 1903, 
that "His Majesty's Government would regard the 
establishment of a naval base or a fortified port in the 
Persian Gulf by any other Power as a very grave menace 
to British interests, and would certainly resist it with 
all the means at their disposal." 

As long ago as 1798 the English concluded a treaty 
with the Sultan of Oman, to exclude the French from 
there. In 1903 Anglo-Russian rivalry in the Persian 
Gulf assumed threatening forms. In November of that 
year Lord Curzon, then Viceroy of India, undertook a 
voyage from Karachi into the Persian Gulf, accompanied 
by British warships, which had much of the nature of a 
naval demonstration. The whole of the trade and shipping 
in the Persian Gulf was in British or Anglo-Indian hands ; 
it was bound, therefore, to arouse apprehension in Great 
Britain when it was proposed to extend the Baghdad 
Railway to Kuweit, the best port in the Gulf. But Great 
Britain had already protected herself. All the states on 
the shores of the Persian Gulf have come through a series 
of treaties under British, or, rather, Anglo-Indian 
protection the Bahrein Islands, which Persia also claims, 
the principalities of Qatar and Kuweit, which until 1914 
werenominaUy under Turkish overlordship, the sultanateof 



OF WORLD POLITICS 195 

Oman with its capital Muscat, and the six principalities 
of the so-called Pirate Coast, off which there lie a number of 
islands which are in dispute between Persia and Great 
Britain. The Persian Gulf is of importance to Britain 
not only as a sea route but as an air route : the air line 
from Iraq to India makes use of the islands of the Persian 
Gulf, and that from India via Aden to East Africa, will 
perhaps do so. 

Great Britain has tried to penetrate Arabia from the 
Persian Gulf and from the Red Sea. During the world 
war the Anglo-Egyptian administration entered into 
negotiations with the Arabs of the Hedjaz ; the Anglo- 
Indian administration negotiated with the Arabs of 
Nejd, whose leader, Ibn Saud, had conquered the coastal 
regions of El Hasa and Hofuf , on the Persian Gulf (until 
then nominally Turkish), in 1913, becoming thus a 
direct neighbour of the British sphere of influence. In 
1915 the British High Commissioner in Egypt, General 
MacMahon, came into touch with the Sherif of Mecca, 
Hussein Ibn Ali, and on December 28th, 1915, Great 
Britain concluded a treaty with Ibn Saud, in which he 
was recognized as ruler of Nejd and Hasa^ ^epting in 
return a loose British protectorate. During^d&e world 
war British troops not only penetrated through the 
Shatt-el-Arab, the only stream of fresh water running 
into the Persian Gulf, past Basra into Iraq, but also into 
southern Persia, where Great Britain held a strong posi- 
tion in Bushire and Mohammerah. The British purpose 
in the occupation of Persia was to prevent an anticipated 
Turco-German attack on India. Neutral Persia became 
a field for struggles and intrigues between Russians and 
British on one side and Germans and Turks on the other. 
After the collapse of the Russian front the British occupied 
the whole of Persia, together with Baku and Georgia on 
the west of the Caspian and Transcaspia on its east. Great 
Britain's power in the Near East appeared then to have 
reached its zenith. British troops controlled Constanti- 
nople and the Caucasus, Egypt and Syria, Iraq and 
Persia. This whole immense block of territory seemed 



196 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

destined to form an assured bridge to India, and the 
German and Russian perils seemed to be at an end for all 
time. The Treaty of Sevres, the Mandates over ex- 
Turkish territories in Asia Minor, and the treaty with 
Persia of August 9th, 1919, which amounted to the 
establishment of a veiled British protectorate over the 
country, especially over its army and its finances, aimed 
at permanently establishing this unhoped-for and to 
some extent unintentionally acquired position, resulting 
from the world war, and, of course, only made possible 
by Russia's collapse. But Russian rivalry was soon to 
emerge in a new and more dangerous form, as an ally of 
a new and totally unexpected factor, the will to self- 
determination of the Oriental peoples, which had started 
at the outset of the twentieth century as a movement of 
the intellectuals on the European model, and began amid 
the disasters of the world war to spread to the masses 
of the people and to win their active support. 

Germany had turned her attention to the south-east 
comparatively late. It is doubtful whether the ultimate 
purpose of the Baghdad Railway and other projects of 
economic expansion in Turkey in Asia was to gain any 
increase of territory. What Germany was seeking was 
sources of raw material and markets for the industry of 
this youngest of the capitalist Powers, an industry which 
hadjnade such enormous advances in so short a period but 
was faced everywhere with older competitors. German 
trade with Turkey had been insignificant just before the 
outset of the present century, but had grown with great 
rapidity. According to figures published by Eliot Grinnell 
Mears, German imports into Turkey grew from 1,239,000 
dollars in 1894 to 22,915,000 doUars in 1912. The bulk of 
this advance, from 5,831,000 dollars to 22,915,000 doUars, 
took place in the six years 1906 to 1912. Up to 1906 
Germany had imported only about half as much as 
France or Italy ; by 1912 she had far out-distanced both 
of these countries. The building of the Baghdad Railway 
was to open access to more distant Asiatic countries for 
German trade and finance, This plan coUapsed during 



OF WORLD POLITICS 197 

the world war through the British conquest of 
Mesopotamia, and the attacks against the Suez Canal 
proved insufficiently prepared ; Germany's political and 
economic leaders then, after the Russian collapse, tried 
to find a way to the south-east through the Caucasus. 
" The politicians who advocated these plans promised 
themselves for Germany, given a strong position in the 
Caucasus, predominant influence in the Black Sea and the 
ability to close the Straits at any time, without being 
dependent for this purpose on Turkey. The Caucasus 
seemed to them to serve as a springboard for political 
activity in Persia and central Asia ; the control of the 
Caucasus seemed to them to be nothing less than the 
keystone of German policy in the Near East. From there 
it would be possible to threaten India, and after Baghdad 
had fallen into British hands the slogan Berlin-Baghc^ 
was very simply converted to Hamburg-Herat. TL> 
imagined route led via the Black Sea, Batoum, Tiflis, 
Baku, and Teheran to Herat in Afghanistan." (Kurt 
Ziemke.) So the collapse of Russia allured both Great 
Britain and Germany into Caucasian dreams, both of 
which quickly vanished into thin air. 

France's interests in the Levant are more difficult 
to define in territorial terms. In all the countries of the 
Levant France was the leading European Great Power in 
the cultural and financial fields. Among the investments 
in the Ottoman empire French capital held first place, 
ahead of British and German. French was the language 
of culture and literature of the educated classes of all the 
peoples of the Levant ; Paris was for them the centre of 
Europe ; French ideals of sovereignty, democracy, and 
the lay state, had won the minds and the hearts of the 
progressive Turks, Egyptians, Arabians and Persians. 
France's cultural and financial interests in Syria were 
particularly great. They were further strengthened by 
the memories of the Crusades, by France's traditional 
position as protector of the Catholics in the Ottoman 
empire, and by the effort of the strongest Mediterranean 
Power in the western basin of the Mediterranean to obtain 



198 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

a firm footing also in the eastern basin. Next to France 
as a Mediterranean Power came Italy, a late-comer like 
Germany in the creation of a unified national state and a 
powerful industry. She was interested in the Ottoman 
empire at three points, in the Adriatic, where she success- 
fully competed first with Austria-Hungary and then with 
Serbia over predominance in Albania ; in the eastern 
basin of the Mediterranean, where as long ago as 1912 she 
occupied the important Turkish island group of the 
Dodecanese, with Rhodes, which is mainly inhabited by 
Greeks (these islands, together with the island of 
Castellorizo, just off the coast of Asia Minor, which has 
been developed into an air base and naval base, are a 
menace to south-western Anatolia) ; and in the Red Sea, 
where she attempted to penetrate Yemen and Asir from 
Eritrea. Italy is seeking opportunities of colonization in 
the Levant for her growing population. But these 
countries, now that national consciousness has been 
awakened in them and has penetrated the masses of the 
people, are a thoroughly unsuitable field for attempts at 
colonization. Even in Tripolitania, which is much more 
backward than the countries of the Levant and is every- 
where thinly populated, Italy had to overcome the greatest 
difficulties for the most modest of success in colonization. 
Even without political penetration, the influence of 
Italian trade in the eastern basin of the Mediterranean 
grows through the country's advantageous geographical 
situation. Since the reconciliation with the Vatican, 
Italy has been trying to take over the protectorate over 
the Levantine Catholic Christians, hitherto exercised by 
France alone, and^has begun to compete with Prance in 
the development of a comprehensive missionary and 
cultural propaganda. 

DURING A]STD AFTER THE WORLD WAR 

Turkey's support of the Central Powers in the world 
war seemed to provide the opportunity for Russia, Great 
Britain, and France to agree upon their plans for dealing 



OF WORLD POLITICS 199 

with the Ottoman empire in the event of their victory. 
The future territorial division of the Ottoman empire 
was partly determined by secret treaties (which only 
came to public knowledge in the autumn of 1917, after the 
opening by the Soviet government of the archives of 
the Russian Foreign Ministry) ; and partly by promises, 
deliberately left in vague terms, which the Allied Powers, 
and especially Great Britain, made in the course of the 
war to Arabs, Armenians, Jews, Kurds, and other peoples 
whose support they endeavoured to gain in this way. 
These secret treaties and promises were made in the spirit 
of the greatest imperialist war ever known ; and all of 
them were only binding so long as the relative strengths 
of the Powers that made them required or permitted 
their observance. Henry U. Hopli writes of Great 
Britain's promises that " it may be said in general that 
there was no intention of observing any of the treaties 
concluded in the course of the military operations if they 
ran counter to her interests ", and this is equally applicable 
to all the other states. The coming years were to show 
the extent to which the small nations of the Levant were 
in reality " only pawns on the chessboard of the victorious 
Powers ". 

As early as March 1915, Russia, Great Britain, and 
France concluded an agreement under which Constanti- 
nople and the Straits were to fall to Russia and the neutral 
zone in Persia to Great Britain. The Holy Places in 
Arabia were to be put under an independent Mohammedan 
government. In the Treaty of London of April 26th, 
1915, Italy^adhered to these agreements, being promised 
in return the section of the south coast of Asia Minor 
around the Gulf of Adalia. At the end of 1915 the 
negotiations were concluded between Great Britain and 
the Sherif of Mecca, the independence of the Arabs being 
agreed to, subject to certain limitations which were not 
clearly defined. So soon after this as May 1916, Sir 
Mark Sykes and Georges Picot, the British and French 
experts in Levant questions, concluded a secret treaty in 
which the general idea was accepted of an " independent 



200 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

Arab state or a federation of Arab states ", but at the 
very outset, while this Arab state was still entirely non- 
existent, it was divided on the model of the old Turkey 
or Persia into British and French zones of influence which 
made any sort of independence illusory. In addition to 
this, Erance received the Syrian coast and Great Britain 
southern Mesopotamia for administration as colonies, 
subject to no restrictions, while, with the agreement of 
Russia and of the Sherif of Mecca, an international 
administration was to be set up in the region west of the 
Jordan, with Jerusalem as its centre. Great Britain also 
received the ports of Haifa and Acre and the right to build 
a railway from Haifa to Baghdad. Eor a period of 
twenty years the Turkish Customs tariff, with its uniform 
ad valorem duties, was to remain in force in the 
" independent " Arab state. The importation of arms 
into the independent Arab realm was to be under the 
control of Great Britain and Erance, so that this state was 
deprived not only of all economic but of all military 
freedom of action. 

In the spring of 1916 Russia gave her agreement to 
these plans of partition, being promised Armenia and 
Kurdistan in return. In order that Italy should not be 
left empty-handed, she was promised, in April 1917, the 
western coast of Asia Minor, with Smyrna, to which Greece 
subsequently made claim. This dispute led to the Greek 
occupation of Smyrna, and this in turn to the Greco- 
Turkish war, out of which the new Turkey was to emerge. 
On November 2nd, 1917, Great Britain, through a letter 
from Balfour to Lord Rothschild, promised her support 
for the creation of a National Home for the Jewish people 
in Palestine, a country which the Arabs regarded as a 
part of their future realm. Armenian delegations had 
repeatedly been solemnly promised by Britain, Erance, 
and America that an Armenian state should be set up 
after, Russia's collapse ; this state was also to include 
the historic regions of Armenia, although these were 
inhabited by a majority of Turks. 



OF WORLD POLITICS 201 

Wlien the time came for carrying out these agreements 
and promises, the situation had fundamentally changed. 
Russia had retired from the war ; and the victory over 
Turkey and over the Central Powers had been more 
complete than was expected. In the Levant Great 
Britain was dominant, as it had been her troops that had 
carried on the campaign in Mesopotamia and in Syria 
and had pushed on victoriously to the limits of Asia 
Minor. In view of the completeness of the victory, the 
Lloyd George Government departed from the view of 
earlier British governments that Turkey must be kept 
alive as a " sick man ". But the sharing of the spoils 
among the various Powers was hampered by mutual 
suspicion; France and Italy, the two Mediterranean 
Powers, had no interest in an excessive strengthening of 
Great Britain in the eastern Mediterranean basin. Not 
until April 24th, 1920, was an agreement arrived at at 
San Remo. This agreement was the first public instru- 
ment after the war in which the oil question was opened 
up; it also laid the bases of the peace treaty of Sevres 
of August 10th, 1920. This treaty partitioned Asia Minor 
into Greek, Italian, and French spheres of influence; 
it assigned Mesopotamia and Palestine to Great Britain, 
subject in the case of Palestine to the obligation of 
facilitating the creation of a Jewish National Home; 
Syria was assigned to France, and provision was made 
for setting up an Armenian and a Kurdish state. 

But the Treaty of Sevres had become out of date at 
the very time when it was drawn up. As T. E. Lawrence 
caustically wrote of the drawing up of the treaty by the 
victor states, " Each party making the terms considered 
only what it could take, or rather what would be most 
difficult for her neighbours to take or to refuse her, and 
the document is not the constitution of a new Asia, but a 
confession, almost an advertisement, of the greeds of the 
conquerors. No single clause of it will stand the test 
of three years practice, and it will only be happier than 
the German treaty in that it will not be revised it will 
be forgotten." 



202 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

Lawrence's forecast has in the main been confirmed. 
In the course of the two years that followed the San Remo 
Conference the situation in the Levant was completely 
changed. The Treaty of S&vres disappeared from view. 
A new factor had unexpectedly come into play, the 
nationalism of the Oriental peoples, a new determination, 
strengthened by experiences of the war and its diplomacy, 
to maintain their independence. The Allied Powers had 
done much by their own conduct to awaken this national- 
ism. The contrast between their promises and their 
true aims had been too gross. As early as November 9th, 
1918, after the armistice which had brought the war 
with Turkey to an end, Great Britain and France had 
made a declaration to the Arab peoples on the future 
destiny of their countries, in which freedom and 
independence were promised, but there were also promised 
an unasked " support and effective assistance " : 

" The aim which Great Britain and France have 
in view in conducting in the East the war which was 
unchained by German ambition is the complete and 
final enfranchisement of the peoples which have for 
so long been oppressed by the Turks and the setting 
up of national governments and administrations, 
drawing their authority from the initiative and free 
choice of the native populations. 

" In order to give effect to these intentions, Great 
Britain and France have agreed to encourage and 
assist the establishment of native governments and 
administrations in Syria and Mesopotamia, now 
liberated by the Allies, and in the territories where 
the Allies are still carrying out the work of liberation, 
and to recognize these governments and adminis- 
trations as soon as they are effectively established. 
Far from desiring to impose upon the populations of 
these districts any particular institutions, Great 
Britain and France have no other concern than to 
assure, by their support and effective assistance, 
the normal working of the governments and 



OF WORLD POLITICS 203 

administrations which these territories will give 
themselves of their own free will. 

" To assure impartial and equal justice for all, to 
facilitate the economic development of the countries 
by stimulating and encouraging local initiative, to 
favour the spread of education, to put an end to 
divisions too long exploited by Turkish policy such 
is the role which the two Allied governments claim for 
themselves in the liberated territories." 

After this the peoples to whom all this was promised 
certainly had the right to wonder in the years that fol- 
lowed how far national governments would be permitted 
to be set up in accordance with the free choice of the native 
populations, and how far economic initiative on the part 
of the native populations would be encouraged and the 
dissensions between the various sections of the population 
no longer accentuated and exploited. 

The first step in the revision of the Treaty of S&vres 
came with the practical settlement of the Armenian 
question. It had already been settled at the time when 
the signatories to the Treaty of S&vres were still holding 
to the policy of setting up an independent Armenian 
state. Simultaneously with the signing of the Treaty of 
Sevres, a treaty was signed by the Allied Powers with 
Armenia, containing various provisions in regard to the 
protection of minorities, most-favoured-nation treatment, 
and so on. It was no more than the ghost of a treaty. 
The Turks under Mustapha Kemal began in the autumn 
of 1920 an attack on the Armenian Republic, which had 
been called into existence by the agreement of May 28th, 
1919, between the Russian and Turkish provinces of 
Greater Armenia. In the Turco-Armenian peace treaty 
of December 2nd, 1920, Armenia had to forgo the 
provisions of the Treaty of Sevres and to content herself 
with a section of Russian Armenia. It was the last 
important official act of thd Armenian Republic. A few 
days later Soviet Russian *oops occupied its territory. 

The Turkish resistance jp Asia Minor to the Treaty of 
Sevres, under the Ieadersh!i3 of Mustapha Kemal, served 



204 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

as an example and a stimulus to the other nations of the 
Near East. A period of unrest and ferment set in in all 
these countries, and was only brought to an end by the 
agreement of the Allied Powers to a series of concessions 
which set limits to their domination over this wide terri- 
tory, a domination which at the beginning of 1919 had 
seemed to be secure and absolute. France renounced 
the economically important territories of Cilicia and 
southern Kurdistan and gave them back to Turkey. 
In the Treaty of Lausanne Turkey won her entire 
independence. On February 21st, 1919, a new Persian 
government came into power, under the leadership of 
Zia Eddin and Riza Khan, commander of the Persian 
Cossack brigade ; on March 8th, 1921, this government 
denounced the Anglo-Persian agreement of August 9th, 
1919, without protest from the British government. 
Persia was soon entirely cleared of British troops. 

In Egypt, Great Britain had declared a Protectorate 
during the world war, and in 1919 she was unwilling to 
bring the Protectorate to an end. After months of unrest, 
and under the pressure of the changed situation in the 
Near East, she decided on February 28th, 1922, to 
recognize Egypt's formal independence and to make an 
end of the Protectorate. In Palestine the British govern- 
ment modified the interpretation of the Balf our Declara- 
tion through a statement made by Sir Herbert Samuel 
and repeated by Winston Churchill. The statement 
interpreted the words " National Home " as meaning that 
"the Jews, who axe a people scattered throughout the 
world, but whose hearts are always turned to Palestine, 
should be enabled to found here their home, and that some 
amongst them, within the limits fixed by the numbers 
and the interests of the present population, should come 
to Palestine in order to help by their resources and efforts 
to develop the country to the advantage of all its 
inhabitants." 

In June 1922, before the conferment of the Mandate 
by the League of Nations, the official interpretation of the 
British policy in Palestine was defined in a White Book. 



OF WORLD POLITICS 205 

In Iraq the Mandate was replaced by a treaty with a 
parliamentary government ; the treaty contains no 
mention whatever of the Mandate. Meanwhile Great 
Britain had agreed to the French Mandate over Syria, 
and allowed King Faisal, son of Hussein of Mecca, to 
fall: Faisal had founded a Syrian-Arab kingdom in 
Damascus. The British aim in this was not only to fall 
in with the French claims but also to drive a wedge 
between the various Arab countries. But Great Britain 
established Faisal as king in Iraq and his brother Abdullah 
as Emir in the country east of the Jordan. This latter 
move was regarded by the French as a menace to their 
possession of Syria. The after-effects of the old conflict 
between British and French policy in the Levant were 
still at work. 

In general, however, the end of 1922 saw a completely 
changed situation in the whole of the Near East. It was 
reflected in declarations made by two statesmen of the 
Allied Powers, which throw a characteristic light on the 
extent to which valuations of one and the same event 
may differ. On November 22nd, 1920, at the first sitting 
of the League of Nations, Lord Balfour described 
Mustapha Kemal as a " bandit " who was utterly insen- 
sible to all the motives which the League brought to bear. 
In the French Chamber on July llth, 1921, Briand said : 
" The Turkish Nationalists are suspicious like all 
nationalists ; they are men who, perhaps owing to the 
immoderation of some parts of the Treaty of Sevres, have 
plunged into nationalism in a burst of violent excitement. 
In France, when French affairs are concerned, we call this 
patriotism. But when it happens in other countries it is 
often called fanaticism, although the cause is the same 
in both cases. 55 

Briand's speech was a sign of the dawning of an under- 
standing of the new movements in the Near East ; so 
also was the change in the British policy in Egypt, Persia, 
and the countries of Arabia. It is one of the fundamental 
characteristics of British policy that it is skilled in 
adapting itself to changed circumstances, and that it 



206 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

takes pains to keep to the path of agreement and for- 
bearance, if it is able in this way to attain its purpose. 
In this it not only shows an eminently practical sense, a 
refusal to be led entirely by theories and an unfailing 
readiness to learn from experience, but also gives expres- 
sion to those ideas of liberty and humanity which found 
their earliest and still find their most powerful embodi- 
ment in England and have also given to British 
imperialistic efforts the consecration of a civilizing mission. 
In the British character there is a strange mixture of a 
hard and unswerving pursuit of power, such as is to be 
found among other peoples as well, and a religious idealism. 
Britain's rule and influence in the East rested not only 
on the high degree of ability and integrity of her officials, 
who in many cases set a standard unknown until then in 
the Near East, but also on the ideas of liberty, manliness, 
and patriotic idealism of which they were an embodiment 
and which they transmitted to the best elements among 
the Orientals. 

As the Europeanization of the East, this supreme 
triumph of the social and intellectual world of the West, 
seems to be turning against Europe and to be leading at 
the very moment of her triumph to her political 
dethronement, so the acceptance and development of the 
British model by the East has turned in a certain sense 
against British control in the East. In the extremely 
difficult years that followed the world war, and seemed 
likely to bring the collapse of the whole economic and 
political system of the world through a violent dynamic 
impulse fed from many sources, the British imperial will 
to self-preservation was forced into a position in conflict 
with the ideals on which it rests. The uncertainty as to 
what was coming and the desire to do all that was possible 
to safeguard the position won in a century and a half of 
unparalleled advance, explain the fluctuations which 
came in the British policy toward the new nationalism 
of the Oriental peoples, once the intoxication of the 
Lloyd Geoige period, produced by the unexpected scale 
of the victory, had passed. 



OF WORLD POLITICS 207 

THE SOVIET UNION AND THE NEAB EAST 

Great Britain would never have been able to deal so 
freely with Persia and the Ottoman heritage in 1919 if the 
Russian empire had still been in existence. But Persia 
and Turkey would not have been able to offer effective 
resistance to the British plans and so completely to throw 
off the Anglo-Persian treaty of 1919 and the Treaty of 
Sevres of 1920, if the Russian empire had not given place 
to the Soviet government. With the arrival of the Soviet 
regime there began a new epoch in the history of the 
relations between East and West. Russia had been the 
European Great Power which had most seriously menaced 
the independence of Turkey and Persia. Now there rang 
out from Russia .an entirely new note : 

" Mohammedans of the East, Persians and Turks, 
Arabs and Indians, all those with whose heads and 
with whose freedom and homelands the greedy robbers 
of Europe have traded between themselves for 
centuries, all those whose countries the plunderers 
who began the war want to share out; 

" We declare that the secret treaties of the fallen 
Tsar concerning the forcible acquisition of Con- 
stantinople are now torn up and abolished. We 
declare that the treaty concerning the partition of 
Persia is torn up and abolished. We declare that the 
treaty concerning the partition of Turkey and the 
taking away of Armenia is torn up and abolished. 
Lose no time in shaking off your shoulders the robbers 
who have pillaged your countries for centuries. Yield 
to them no longer the soil of your native land for 
plundering. You must be yourselves the rulers of 
your countries. You have the right to this. Your 
destiny is in your hands/ 5 

This manifesto was an encouragement of the national 
liberation movements of the Oriental peoples. No doubt 
Communism had further aims : the national revolution 
was to become a social revolution, it was to be the 
peasants and workers of the Oriental nations who should 



208 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

set up their state. At the Congress of Eastern Nations 
at Baku in September 1920, this declaration was made : 

" Our main blow must be aimed at British capital- 
ism. But at the same time we want to arouse the 
working masses of the Near East to hatred, to the 
determination to struggle against all rich classes 
without discrimination. The revolution which is now 
beginning in the East does not aim at asking the 
British imperialists to take their feet off the table in 
order to permit the rich Turks to stretch their own 
legs with more comfort. No, we shall very cour- 
teously request the rich to lift their feet off the table 
so that there shall be no more vain luxury among us, 
no more contempt of the people, no idling, but that the 
world shall be governed by the horny hand of the 
worker. 55 

This attitude, however, was soon changed. The 
national revolutions in the Near East had replaced 
effete and corrupt monarchies, politically and economically 
dependent on Western Imperialism, by a young bour- 
geoisie which was out to secure political and economic 
emancipation, and the Soviet Union saw in them natural 
allies in the struggle against Western Imperialism and 
Great Britain. There was no community of ideas ; the 
new states were actively occupied, with nTi-miatfi.Trii.hle 
success, in keeping all Communist propaganda outside 
their frontiers. But the Soviet government was suffi- 
ciently realist to recognize the natural historic process, 
and adroitly adapted its policy to the situation. It most 
carefully avoided all exercise of Communistic influence 
that went beyond the miniTirmTn felt to be necessary for 
form's sake. Mustapha Kemal for his part entirely 
renounced all Pan-Turanian propaganda (which had 
figured so prominently in the programme of the Young 
Turks) among the numerous Mohammedan peoples of 
Turkish race who inhabit the Soviet Union. The Soviet 
Union and the states of the Near East were united in a 
defensive relationship, since all of them imagined 



OF WORLD POLITICS 209 

themselves to be threatened by " Western Imperialism ". 
But the states of the Near East not only strenuously 
shut themselves off from any sort of Communist propa- 
ganda, but also emphatically asserted their independence 
again and again in their relations with the Soviet Union. 
They refused to allow themselves to be drawn under its 
leadership ; they merely accepted its support in order to 
hold their own against the West, taking care at the same 
time on no account to come to a breach with the West, 
whose support was necessary to them in order to enable 
them to hold their own against the Soviet Union. 

All these states are undergoing a process of European- 
ization and industrialization similar to that of the Soviet 
Union, though at a much slower pace and on a much 
smaller scale. As this process is taking place in the Near 
East with the assistance of the state and under the leader- 
ship of the state, it has many features in common with 
state capitalism. The Soviet Union is prepared to 
encourage this development in Turkey and in Persia ; 
in the Near East it finds a useful market at its door for 
its own growing industries, just as Turkey, as the pioneer 
of industrialization in Asia Minor, will seek for markets 
in the neighbouring Asiatic states. Thus there is an 
economic as well as a political community of interest. 
Both are exceeded in importance by the strategic com- 
munity of interest, as Turkey and Iran, owing to their 
situation along the Straits and the Black Sea, are of great 
service in covering the flank of the Soviet Union, just as 
their friendly relations with their great neighbour in the 
north give Turkey and Persia the assurance of oppor- 
tunities of peaceful development. Thus a relationship 
has developed between the Soviet Union on one side and 
Turkey, Iran, and Afghanistan on the other, which is 
built up on co-operation between the two groups, while 
preserving the complete independence and the funda- 
mentally divergent structure of each party. The leaders 
of the Soviet Union recognize that any strengthening of 
political and economic independence of the former colonial 
and semi-colonial peoples represents in itself a weakening 



210 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

of the imperialist capitalism against which they are 
struggling ; and they consider that there can be no 
question of a social revolution in the countries of the Near 
East until those countries have completed their bourgeois 
movement of national emancipation. 

In the critical years during which they were establish- 
ing their position with regard to Europe, Turkey and 
Persia found in the Soviet Union an ally without whom 
they would have been unable to maintain their stand. 
The very existence of Tsarist Russia would have made 
their emancipation impossible or very nearly so. The 
Soviet government not only did not continue the policy 
of the Tsarist empire, but entirely reversed it, making a 
complete break with the past policy of all the European 
Powers in the Near East. It accepted and carried into 
execution all the demands of the national movements of 
the Near East in regard to their relations with Europe : 
the renunciation of territorial acquisitions and spheres 
of influence and the abolition of all capitulations and 
concessions. A European Great Power which until then 
had been regarded in the Near East as one of the most 
dangerous aggressors now voluntarily renounced every- 
thing that could in any way restrict the full independence 
of the states of the Neax East. Russia did not give up 
her century-old struggle against Great Britain in the 
Near East, but took up the struggle in another sphere. 
Hitherto Britain and Russia had faced one another as 
rivals in the same field of ideas, and had competed with 
one another in limiting the political and economic indepen- 
dence of the states of the Near East : Russia now placed 
herself on the side of the national struggles for indepen- 
dence of these states, continuing in this way to pursue 
her struggle against Britain. Thus it was that the 
success of Turkey and Persia in their struggles for 
independence and in the abrogation of capitulations was 
at the same time a success for Soviet policy. This attitude 
of the Soviet Union has also influenced the attitude of 
the other European Powers in the Near East ; Britain 
herself, in her later spirit of accommodation in Persia 



OF WORLD POLITICS 211 

and in other countries, has been at pains to take account 
of the changed situation. 

The new situation dates from the treaty concluded in 
Moscow on February 26th, 1921, between Soviet Russia 
and Persia. This treaty not only recognized Persia's 
entire independence and the abrogation of all capitula- 
tions and concessions, but also declared Persia's debts to 
Russia to be wiped out, and transferred to the Persian 
government the roads and railways which Russia had 
built in northern Persia. On March 16th, 1921, there 
followed the treaty of friendship with Turkey, Article 4 
of which runs as follows : 

" Recognizing that national movements in the 
Orient are similar to and in harmony with the struggle 
of the Russian working men for the new social order, 
the two contracting parties assert solemnly the rights 
of these peoples to freedom, independence, and free 
choice of such forms of government as they themselves 
desire to have," 

This treaty was an important step in Turkey's struggle 
for freedom. It recognized for the first time the Turkish 
Great National Assembly and the Turkish national pact, 
together with the frontiers it established, the demarcation 
of which involved a Russian renunciation of territory. 
On the strength of this treaty Turkey was able to stand 
out against the Powers at the peace conference of 
Lausanne. On many subsequent occasions Turkey was 
able to take advantage of this entrenchment of her 
position. After the decision of the League of Nations 
that handed over the Mosul region to Great Britain, 
Turkey concluded with the Soviet Union the Treaty of 
Paris of December 17th, 1925, which was to draw still 
closer the bond between the two countries. In the 
additional protocol signed at Ankara on July 1st, 1926, 
it was expressly stated that the Treaty of Paris rests on 
the same principles as the Treaty of Moscow of 1921. 
On December 17th, 1929, the treaty was renewed. The 
policy of the two states follows the same lines, resting on 



212 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

a common conception of the independence of the Oriental 
nations. As between the Soviet Union and the Western 
Powers themselves, Turkey intends to remain neutral, 
while preserving her friendship with the Soviet Union. 
Without desiring to imperil this friendship, Turkey 
wishes to keep open all the roads to the West. With this 
view she entered the League of Nations in July 1932. 
In doing so she became in effect a bridge between the 
Soviet Union and Europe, which itself began to put out 
feelers in the direction of the League. In the autumn 
of 1934 the Soviet Union joined the League. It had 
further reason for doing so in view of the completely 
altered conditions in Europe since 1933. Afghanistan 
joined the League in the same month ; Iraq had already 
become a Member State in 1932, and thus the Soviet 
Union, Turkey, Iran, Afghanistan, and Iraq are now all 
represented in the League of Nations. 

In its intervention on behalf of Turkey, Persia, and 
Afghanistan, the Soviet Union not only gave support to 
their independence but worked to bring these three states 
into closer relations with one another. It is thus the 
originator of the loose coalition which these three states 
have formed. The first treaty of this nature was 
significantly signed in Moscow, as early as March 1st, 
1921, between Turkey and Afghanistan. In this treaty 
the contracting parties declare " that all Oriental peoples 
have the right to entire freedom and independence, that 
each of these peoples is free to govern itself in the manner 
it desires, that each of them, if there should be any 
aggression on the part of an imperialist state in the pursuit 
of a policy of expansion or spoliation in the Near East, 
regards this aggression as directed against itself and 
will resist it with every means." Afghanistan declares 
in this treaty that Turkey is a model of national liberation, 
and Turkey binds herself to assist Afghanistan by supply- 
ing instructors. 

This treaty also breathes the new spirit which has 
been brought by nationalism and Bolshevism into the 
relations of the states of Asia Minor with one another 



OP WORLD POLITICS 213 

and with the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union has 
surrounded itself in the south with a zone of neutral 
states, bound to it and to one another by treaties of 
friendship. This association of countries of Asia Minor, 
which makes impossible any menace to the Soviet Union 
in the Black Sea, the Caucasus, and central Asia, came 
into existence on the initiative of Soviet Russia and is 
under her patronage. It is one of the most important 
achievements of the Soviet Union in Asia, though it is 
exclusively a political and economic achievement and not 
one of Communist propaganda. But this achievement 
was only possible because the Soviet Union was guided 
by ideas which placed the relationship between East and 
West, between Great Power and semi-colonial country, 
on a new basis. This policy enabled the states of the Near 
East to preserve neutrality in the Anglo-Russian conflict 
and to maintain their independence. These states, once 
the plaything of international politics and of world 
industry and finance, have attained to an existence of 
their own, the independence of which is carefully guarded 
on all sides. 

MINOEITIBS 

In the occasions of political tension in the Levant the 
problem of minorities has always played an important 
part. It has served again and again as a ground for the 
intervention of the Powers in the internal affairs of the 
states of the Near East. The minorities have thus become 
a means of weakening the states in which they lived, an 
obstacle in the way of the efforts at consolidating and 
strengthening these states and at gaining their emancipa- 
tion and independence. The Treaty of Sevres itself, after 
carefully defining the right of the ethnic, religious, or 
lingual minorities in Turkey, expressly provides that the 
Powers, in unison with the League of Nations, have 
unrestricted authority themselves to take the necessary 
measures to assure the protection of the minorities, 
independently of the Turkish state, which declares its 



214 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

agreement in advance with any step they may take. The 
treaty aimed in this way at perpetuating the Powers' 
right of intervention and extending it at any time if they 
so desired. The policy of the Powers and its application 
on behalf of the minorities was of little advantage to the 
minorities, certainly of no permanent advantage to them. 
It prevented the natural process of integration of these 
minorities in the state, and the social and economic 
advance that would bring ; and often it brought the 
minorities into a very dangerous situation, as it accen- 
tuated the hostility between majority and minority and 
increased it beyond endurance. Such apparent advantages 
as accrued to the minority turned in the last resort greatly 
to the disadvantage not only of the state but also of the 
minority. Sources of conflict were created and attained 
a more and more menacing character. The internal peace- 
of the Oriental states, and with it often the peace of the 
world, was endangered by nothing so much as by the 
policy not seldom followed of strengthening the minorities 
at the expense of the majority and playing off the two 
against one another. The minorities were often only too 
willing to permit themselves to be used in this way, blind 
to the potential ultimate consequences. 

While the national process of integration in the Levant 
eliminated certain minorities as political factors, especially 
such purely religious minorities as those of the Copts in 
Egypt and the Christian Arabs in Syria proper, it increased 
the differences where there were diversities of race or 
nationality. Various differences grew in acuteness through 
the policy of the Great Powers. The most important 
example in the past of the political effects of the Powers' 
minority policy is provided by the Armenians, in whose 
favour the Berlin Congress of 1878 imposed reforms on 
Turkey and invested the Powers with a right of inter- 
vention. From then on the aiding of the Armenians and 
the prospect of their being able to regain their existence 
as a state in their historic homeland, in which the over- 
whelming majority of their race still lived as peasants, 
became the subject of vigorous propaganda among the 



OF WORLD POLITICS 215 

Christian peoples, especially in England. The Armenians 
were not only a Christian people but had a high level of 
culture ; they were always keenly interested in the 
advancement of education and of their school system, 
their sense of their historic past as a nation was particularly 
highly developed, their church, a national church, was the 
loyal guardian of the national traditions and aspirations, 
and the Armenians placed themselves with the utmost 
devotion at the service of these aspirations. But the 
propaganda and the sympathy in the Christian states, 
especially in the Anglo-Saxon world, for the Armenians 
and their cause were of service to them only for a period. 
The American writer Eliot Grinnell Mears has said not 
without justice in bis book Modern Turkey : 

" The Armenian tragedy in Turkey is the inevit- 
able outcome of uncontrolled propaganda. Stimu- 
lated into a sense of growing independence and of false 
security because of the extensive publicity in foreign 
countries and the successful appeals for charity, these 
people were led to believe the time had come when 
they would be partitioned off entirely from their 
oppressive ruler, the Ottoman Government. How 
long will it take minorities or weak countries to 
understand that in practical politics outside assis- 
tance is a mere gamble ? Yet, if ever a people 
thought that they were well supported from 
abroad, the Armenians ,were justly entitled to this 
opinion/' 

The Armenians received repeated promises from the 
Great Powers and from public opinion, and large sums 
of money were collected abroad for them, with the result 
that many Armenians were actually pauperized by being 
made dependent on foreign support. During the world 
war the Armenians were military allies of the Western 
Powers, and even after the armistice they took an active 
share in CiKcia in the fighting against Turkey. The 
Armenians have a past filled with suffering and martyrdom 



216 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

such as few other nations have borne. On March llth, 
1920, Lord Chirzon said in Parliament : 

" Armenia is really an international interest, 
and it ought not to fall to the duty or to the charge 
of any individual nations to be solely responsible 
for this people in the future. Their sufferings have 
touched the whole world. The obligation to restore 
them has been given by the fighting powers of the 
world, and it is no unreasonable thing to ask the 
world and by the world I mean the Allied Powers 
in the recent war to show their interest in the future 
of that country." 

These words of Lord Curzon's were spoken in order to 
shift Great Britain's moral responsibility on to a 
collectivity which found itself just as unable to do any- 
thing as Great Britain herself. This melancholy inter- 
ment of the Armenian hopes, in so far as they were based 
on British promises, was completed by Sir Austen 
Chamberlain when he declared in the House of Commons 
on December 5th, 1928 : 

" The history of this question is, I think, one of 
the saddest phases of the War. If there has been 
failure to carry out all the obligations undertaken by 
ourselves jointly with other Powers, I think the blame 
is not upon this country." 

It is true that Great Britain was not alone in having 
promised help to the Armenians. Boghos Nubar Pasha, 
who represented the Armenian cause at the Peace 
Conference, has said : " The Armenians remember, and 
will never f orget, the wonderful enthusiasm shown in our 
favour by the American people, and how greatly it was 
promoted by the personal action of President Wilson." 
The consequence was that the Armenians fully trusted 
the United States, and hoped for their assistance in regain- 
ing the Armenian soil with which they felt themselves 
to be united by all the sacred memories of their history. 
Nubar Pasha defended their claim for the allocation to 



OF WORLD POLITICS 217 

them of the territories which in their opinion had always 
been Armenian geographically, historically, and ethno- 
logically, even though they were now inhabited only by a 
minority of Armenians, on the ground that the country 
of their forefathers could not be denied them because 
there were now too few of them, especially since this 
minority condition was the result of massacres and 
expulsions through a long period of tragic history. The 
resettlement of the Armenians in their old homeland, in 
which the majority of their nation had always lived, 
would not only mean the recovery of this country through 
Armenian industry and enterprise, the Armenians would 
not only regain their place among the civilized nations of 
the world, but they would also become, " as they were 
in the past, an element of peace and prosperity in the 
Near East ". 

Before the war the Armenians had set all their hopes 
of liberation, and of union with the Armenians in Russia, 
on the Russians, Meanwhile the British had made 
genuine efforts to improve the situation of the Armenians 
by means of reforms. In the agreement of February 8th, 
1914, the Armenian parts of Turkey were granted a 
measure of autonomy under international control. But 
this agreement brought the Armenians fresh hopes of 
entire independence, and on the other hand it opened 
the eyes of the Turks to the danger represented by the 
Armenian question to the security of their empire. During 
the world war France promised that the Armenian problem 
should be settled " in accordance with the high dictates 
of humanity and justice". But with the collapse of the 
Russian empire, to which it had been proposed to assign 
Armenia, the Armenian question became acute, especially 
as it was proposed that Armenia should form part of the 
buffer zone providing security against Soviet Russia, 
and should at the same time form a wedge between 
Turkey and Persia. In his speech of January 5th, 1918, 
Mr Lloyd George placed Armenian independence in his 
programme. A delegation chosen in the spring of 1919 by 
a Pan-Armenian Congress in Paris demanded from the 



218 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

Peace Conference the creation of an independent Armenia, 
to be placed as a Mandated territory under one of the 
Allied Powers for the period of twenty years. "It is 
noteworthy that the Armenians asked of their own accord 
to be placed under a Mandate, in entire contrast to the 
Arabs, who rejected the mandate system. This provided 
the Allies with a really splendid opportunity of carrying 
through the idea of mandates to success in entire accord 
with the mandated nation as one which, by its own 
confession, had not yet attained maturity." (Kurt 
Ziemke.) 

Thus the Armenian Mandate would have come into 
existence in genuine agreement with the terms of. Article 
22 of the League of Nations Covenant, whereas the other 
mandates were not in accordance with its provisions. 
But nobody could be found to accept the Mandate, and 39 
Armenia became a fully sovereign state against its will 
under the Treaty of Sevres, of which it was one of the 
signatories. 

But while the Powers and, later, the League of Nations 
were still debating the destiny of Armenia, it was in fact 
already decided. Armenia, already recognized as a 
sovereign state, applied for admittance to the League of 
Nations. Through the intervention of the Great Powers 
the application was rejected, though the hope was 
expressed that it would be possible to admit Armenia 
at the next League session. This hope was not fulfilled, 
although at subsequent sessions in the years that followed 
platonic resolutions in favour of the Armenians and their 
national home were repeatedly adopted by the League. 
The Armenian delegation at the peace conference at 
Lausanne was reduced to the bitter remark that the 
belligerent nation which had suffered most in the world 
war, and, trusting the Allied Powers, had lost one-third 
of its population in fighting for its independence, now 
found itself completely isolated, and surrounded by a 
silence in strong contrast to the propaganda which once 
had so greatly encouraged the national hopes of the 



OF WORLD POLITICS 219 

In the end all the goodwill and readiness to help, which 
originally existed beyond question in Great Britain and 
America, was reduced to capitulation in face of the facts, 
and was unable to do anything to modify the fate of the 
Armenians. Armenia also exemplifies the wide gap 
between intentions and the actual execution of the man- 
datory idea in the former Turkish communities. The 
mandates were intended to bridge over the conflict between 
the secret agreements made by the Allies for the partition 
of Turkey in Asia and the Wilsonian principles of the 
independence of the small nations. The proposed 
mandated territories were Arabia, Armenia, Mesopotamia, 
Palestine, and Syria. The distribution of mandates was 
preceded by long and bitter struggles between the Allied 
Powers. The provision in the Covenant, framed in the 
Wilsonian spirit, that in the choice of the mandatory 
Power the wishes of the population should be the primary 
consideration, found no practical application. President 
Wilson did make an effort to put it into practice by 
sending two Commissions, one under Charles Crane and 
Henry King to Syria and Palestine, and one under James 
Harbord to Armenia. But the two reports were kept 
secret by the Peace Conference, and no notice was taken 
of their recommendations. The delimitation and dis- 
tribution of mandates was decided neither by the interests 
nor by the desires and needs of the mandated peoples, 
but by the interests, desires and needs of Great Britain 
and France. The Powers were not interested in the 
mandates for Armenia, whose inhabitants wanted one, 
or for Arabia, whose inhabitants were certainly more 
backward and more in need of guidance than, say, the 
Syrians. The remaining mandates, arranged in the 
interest of the Great Powers, had to be imposed by force 
and maintained by force over the " liberated " peoples. 
The practical application of the mandate principle has 
little in common with Wilsonian idealism. 

Nevertheless the relaxation of colonial rule which lay 
at the root of the mandate principle has been productive 
of good and has assisted progress. Great Britain in 



220 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

Iraq, in wise application of her art of adaptation and 
progressive development of political forms, has given 
effect to the original intention of the mandatory idea, 
over-riding the spirit of San Remo and Sevres, and France 
has had to follow her example to some extent in Syria, 
although only with reluctance and half-heartedly. There 
seems a prospect of many further struggles and difficulties 
in Syria before Ifrance will proceed to carry out the 
mandate idea as has been done in Iraq, but it is of great 
importance that in Iraq the mandate has developed in 
the direction originally intended that of a compromise 
between the interests of the Great Powers and the national 
aspirations of the Oriental peoples. 



3STEAR EASTERN ALLIANCES AND COLLABOBATION 

The nations and rulers of the Near East know that in 
isolation from one another they are too weak to be able 
to defend their interests in face of the interests of the 
Powers. The economic and social transformation they 
are undergoing, the transition from an agricultural barter 
system to the use of money, involving them in the com- 
plexities of capitalism and industrialization, is calling for 
the recruitment of elements which can only be supplied 
by communities of a substantial size, as only such com- 
munities possess population, organizing ability, and 
economic and cultural resources and sources of energy on 
the needed scale. This naturally raises the question of 
union and mutual assistance. The idea of this forces 
itself particularly on popular attention in cases in which 
racial and lingual unity are present, the existing territorial 
divisions being the result of dynastic rivalries or the 
interests of foreign Powers, as has been the case in the 
countries of Arabia. Thus we find in the Near East two 
types of effort, one, among the countries of Arabia, directed 
to close union, even to union in a single state ; the other, 
embracing peoples of entirely different language and 
origin, directed only to collaboration and a loose form of 
alliance and mutual assistance. The former of these 



OF WORLD POLITICS 221 

two movements, the Arabian unity movement, has been 
the work of the peoples, their governments, either in 
subservience to foreign Powers or out of concern for 
dynastic interests of their own, often working against 
the movement ; the latter movement, working for the 
formation of a system of alliances between powers of the 
Near East, is at present being engineered entirely by the 
governments, which are national independent govern- 
ments, while their peoples, differing in language and race, 
are strangers to one another and in many cases mutually 
uncomprehending. 

A third " pan-movement ", the Pan-Turanian move- 
ment, which came into prominence some twenty years 
ago, has since vanished from sight. After the Balkan 
wars and the loss of the bulk of its possessions in Europe, 
the centre of gravity of the Ottoman empire shifted into 
Asia Minor. The transfer of the centre of activities in 
Turkey from the European shore of the Bosphorus to 
Anatolia dates virtually from that period. The Young 
Turks were beginning to fear the loss of the Arabian 
provinces, and worked for union with the Turkish peoples 
of the Caucasus and central Asia, who were allied with 
them in race and language. Mustapha Kemal entirely 
dropped the Pan-Turanian idea. Instead, at the begin- 
ning of the twentieth century, the Arabian idea had 
emerged, and it steadily gained in concreteness. 

The beginning of the movement for the liberation and 
union of the Arabs dates from about thirty years ago ; 
it embraced the inhabitants of Mesopotamia, Syria and 
Palestine, and the rest of the Arabian peninsula, but not 
the Arabic-speaking races of the north of Africa. At the 
head of the movement there stood Arab officers of the 
Turkish army, who were influenced by the example of 
the Young Turks, and Arabian inteUectuals, especially 
Syrians, who had begun to come under the influence of 
European thought. If the world war had not come, the 
preparations of their secret societies would have grown 
by 1920 or so to the stage when a general rising of Arabian 
countries would have come, with the aim of liberation 



222 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

from Turkish rule. The war hastened developments, 
but at the same time put difficulties in their way. During 
the war the League of Arabian officers which existed in 
Mesopotamia rigorously avoided all association with the 
Entente Powers, considering that any European inter- 
vention would be much more dangerous to their future 
than was Turkish rule. A different policy was adopted 
by the Syrian nationalists, and by the Sherif of Mecca, 
Hussein ibn Ali, who was under their influence : they 
entered into negotiations with the Entente. Hussein's 
rising against the Turks first brought into the public eye 
the Arabian national movement for unity and freedom ; 
the movement was recognized by Great Britain and the 
Allied Powers. Hussein adopted the title of King of the 
Hedjaz. His rising brought valuable assistance to the 
British in the protection of the Suez Canal. His troops 
served as the right wing of the allied army against the 
Turks, and under his son, Faisal, and T. E. Lawrence, the 
English organizer of the " revolt in the desert ", they 
conquered Transjordania and Syria from Akaba to Aleppo. 
Hussein was a romantic dreamer, out to obtain not 
only Arab unity and freedom but the restoration of the 
Khalif ate to its original holders. But he proved too little 
of a realist, too inexperienced in the ways of European 
diplomacy. Instead of insisting on precisely drawn 
agreements, he contented himself with vague promises 
from the British and started the revolt before treaties in 
clearly defined terms had been drawn up between him and 
Great Britain. About the same time Great Britain and 
France had concluded the Sykes-Picot agreement, dis- 
posing of the Arab countries regardless of the assurances 
given of their independence, and there began the inter- 
play between incompatible public promises and secret 
agreements, in the meshes of which Hussein found himself 
entangled. No attention was paid to the protests of this 
aged Arab leader, and in the end he refused to sign the 
Treaty of Versailles and to join the League of Nations. 
There was an end of the dream of Arab unity and freedom ; 
Arabia had been partitioned. 



OF WORLD POLITICS 223 

But under the changed circumstances of the post-war 
period the Arabs kept alive their ambition for unity and 
freedom. Their experience had taught them that they 
could only win independence by unity among themselves. 
Hussein's heritage was taken over under these new con- 
ditions by Ibn Saud, the leader of the Wahhabites, and by 
Faisal, son of Hussein. Ibn Saud, after wresting the 
Hedjaz from Hussein's hands, founded a unified central 
Arabian state reaching from the Persian Gulf to the Red 
Sea. Faisal, as King of Iraq, stood at the head of the 
first Arab Member State of the League of Nations. These 
two rulers have beyond doubt been the ablest political 
leaders of the Arabs, incomparably more realist and more 
experienced than Hussein. Ibn Saud has succeeded in 
enlisting the religious energy of his Wahhabites in the 
service of the Arab unity movement and in bringing order 
and state cohesion into the former chaos of the desert, 
the essential preliminaries for the bringing of central 
Arabia into a unified Arab realm and at the same time for 
a gradual modernization. 

Under Ibn Saud Mecca has once more become one of 
the centres of the Arab national movement, the centre 
that is most firmly anchored in the tradition of life and 
faith of the nation. Baghdad, under the able and 
statesmanly leadership of Faisal, has become another 
centre, more open to European influence and to social 
and economic modernization. Both of these rulers axe 
working deliberately and with tenacity toward the goal 
of Arab unity, and their reconciliation in February 1930 
brought this goal nearer. From the first Ibn Saud 
regarded his state as the nucleus of Arab unity, regardless 
of its poverty and backwardness. In Italy and Germany 
in the nineteenth century unification proceeded similarly 
from regions which originally were backward in economic 
and cultural conditions and had built up their power on a 
military basis. In 1932 Ibn Saud changed the name of 
his dual kingdom of Hedjaz and Nejd to Saudi Arabia, thus 
introducing the name of the new national unit. In 1934 
he successfully demonstrated the military superiority of 



224 INTER-RELATION AND IMPLICATIONS 

his realm by defeating the only strong rival still remaining 
in the Arabian peninsula, the Imam Yehya of Yemen. 

The Peace Treaty of Taif , concluded in June 1934, 
confirmed Ibn Saud's rapid and decisive victory. But 
its main purpose was to strengthen Arab unity. It was 
therefore described in the preamble as a "treaty of Moslem 
and Arab brotherhood, to promote the unity of the Arab 
nation, to enhance its position, and to maintain its dignity 
and independence ". Both parties declared that " their 
nations are one, and agree to consider each other's interest 
as their own ". The desire expressed in the treaty to 
form a united front against any attack on the Arabian 
peninsula marks a distinct progress, which ten years ago 
would have seemed almost incredible, in Arab national 
consciousness. Only a few years ago the two sides were 
divided by traditional feuds and by a vehement 
antagonism arising from narrow religious dissension, and 
both were regarded as moved only by an obstinate sec- 
tarian spirit and as completely alien to any broad 
nationalism. Now the tribal and sectarian particularism 
has given way, largely through Ibn Saud's efforts, to a 
new sense of community. Growing ties of solidarity 
and national feeling are beginning to unite the peninsula 
with the Arab countries of the fertile crescent in which 
Baghdad, under the leadership of King Ghazi (who suc- 
ceeded to the throne on his father's death in September 
1933), has become the rallying point of the national 
aspirations of the Arabs of Syria, Palestine, Trans- 
jordania, and Iraq. But nobody can say when or how 
the unity and freedom proclaimed thirty years ago by the 
first protagonists of the Arab national idea will be 
attained. 

Baghdad also formed the link between the future 
Arab league and the much looser association of the states 
of Asia Minor, which originally embraced Turkey, Persia, 
and Afghanistan, and which is seeking the support of the 
now independent Iraq. All these states are passing 
through the same process of social and economic trans- 
formation. The country which has made most progress 



OF WORLD POLITICS 225 

in this respect, Turkey, is for that reason becoming the 
leader of the association and the model for the process 
of development. It is a process that has swept away 
the differences between the various states, some of which 
had lasted for hundreds of years. For decades the 
relations between Turkey and Persia were clouded by 
frontier disputes : the Turks claimed Persian Azerbaijan, 
which was inhabited by Turks, and the Persians regarded 
the Kurds as racial brethren who should be included in 
the Persian realm. There was also friction between 
Persia and Afghanistan, which had earlier been under 
Persian influence. In the Peace of Paris of 1857 the 
Persians had been compelled by Great Britain definitely 
to abandon the conquest of Afghanistan. But until 
quite recent times Persia had been trying to gain posses- 
sion of the important region of Herat in north-west 
Afghanistan, and Afghanistan in her turn wanted to gain 
possession of Persian Baluchistan and so to secure access 
to the sea. 

These differences were removed through the friendly 
offices of the Soviet Union, The Turco-Af ghan Treaty of 
March 1st, 1921, first announced the intention of the 
Oriental powers, who were now assured that their rear 
was covered by the Soviet Union, to pursue an active 
policy. The treaty was followed by a new treaty of 
friendship and co-operation, signed in Ankara on May 25th, 
1928 ; the first Article of this new treaty, which is not 
subject to denunciation and is to be regarded as valid for 
all time, provides that there shall be perpetual peace and 
sincere and unchanging friendship between the two states 
and the two peoples. On April 22nd, 1926, the treaty of 
friendship and security was signed at Teheran between 
Persia and Turkey, and there followed on November 
28th, 1927, the Persian-Afghan Treaty. These are not 
alliances in the narrow sense but mutual undertakings 
of friendship and goodwill. This association and 
co-operation has become still closer in the last two years, 
through many visits and meetings at Ankara and Teheran 
and in the Soviet Union, though for a time at all events 

15 



226 WORLD POLITICS 

Afghanistan took no active part in them. Turkey has been 
trying to bring in Iraq, so far as this is possible in view 
of the special position of this country with regard to 
Great Britain. Turkey cleared away her own quarrel 
with Iraq by accepting the arbitral award over Mosul, and 
has been trying to smooth away the elements of friction 
between Iraq and Iran. In recent years the former 
strained relations between Turkey, Iran, and Iraq have 
been influenced by the progress of new ideas and a fresh 
outlook, and the closer political association will also lead 
to economic co-operation. The national Turkish com- 
mercial bank, Ish Bankasi, intends to set up branches 
in Teheran and Baghdad, in addition to the one in Alex- 
andria. The national Egyptian commercial bank, the 
Misr Bank, has set up a subsidiary in Syria and intends 
to set up others in Iraq and in Saudi Arabia. All this is 
an entirely new development. The countries of the 
Near East, hitherto only passive elements in world 
economic and political movements, the arena in which 
European interests competed with one another, are 
becoming, as a consequence of their Europeanization, 
active participators in history. 



METHODS AND PROBLEMS OF 
EUROPEANIZATION 

THE Europeanizing forces at work in recent decades in 
the Near East, as in other parts of the world outside 
Europe, have been the same everywhere. The trans- 
formation now in progress all over the world is thus 
essentially a uniform process. For all that, there are 
important differences of detail. For all their uniformity, 
the forces at work have been operating in different 
environments, and their detailed operation has been 
conditioned by factors differing from place to place 
such factors as the political system, the geographical 
situation, the national character. Consequently the 
process of Europeanization has followed, for instance, 
varying courses in Turkey and in Egypt, in Syria and in 
the Hedjaz. The fundamental process, however, has 
been the same that of adaptation to the intellectual, 
economic, and social elements of existence which have 
spread over the world from Western Europe. 

Europeanization has proceeded most rapidly and 
most thoroughly in the states which have won national 
independence, such as Turkey. Here the government 
is devoting all its energies to the development of the 
nation and the raising of its standard of living. In states 
which are not independent, in colonial and mandated 
territories, the foreign government directly or indirectly 
responsible for administration has little interest in the 
economic modernization of the country through the 
energies of the native population itself, or in any rapid 
improvement in the level of education. It may not 
hamper these advances, but as a rule it does not actively 
promote them. This is particularly the case in purely 
colonial countries, countries, that is, which serve for the 
settlement of European immigrants. In these countries 
least progress of all is made with the Europeanization of 

227 



228 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

the native population, since the necessary functions of 
Europeanization are fulfilled by the immigrants, with 
whom the native population is entirely unable to compete 
either in capital resources or in experience. Such countries 
become Europeanized, but the Europeanization does not 
proceed from the native population and in the main does 
not affect it. The first essential for the raising of the 
standard of living, for the awakening of a new sense of 
freedom and worth, which Europeanization brings with 
it for the indigenous masses, for the creation and 
assurance of a fuller, richer, and finer human life, is the 
possession of a government which feels itself to be 
intimately associated with the native population and its 
interests. 

The pace of Europeanization and the form it takes are 
also very largely determined by the geographical situation 
of a country and its natural fertility. In regions which 
for centuries have been accessible to world trade, in the 
coastal districts of the seas crossed by European vessels, 
in. countries rich in natural resources, the process of 
Europeanization can develop more rapidly and more 
thoroughly than in less favoured regions. Thus Turkey 
has an advantage over Iran, the Syrian coast over Iraq, 
Egypt over Abyssinia or the Hedjaz. 

The third dominant factor is the character of the 
people. Europeanization means training in initiative, in 
activity, in discipline. It demands a steeling of the 
character, an independence, a civic courage, a devotion 
unknown or very rare under Oriental autocracies. A 
strong race, used to domination, like the Turks, will thus 
make its way more easily than softer and more pliable 
races like the Egyptians. There are also the differences, 
found all over the world, between the dwellers in the 
mountains and highlands and the men of the plains, or 
between country people and townspeople. 

All these different factors reinforce or run counter to 
one another in each particular case, so that the European- 
ization of the Near East, like every other element of real 
history, offers a variegated and multiform picture. The 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 229 

process embraces the whole of the Near East, with which 
until quite recent times and in many cases even to this 
day the Balkans may be included the countries, mainly 
of the Orthodox Christian Church, which at the beginning 
of the last century formed part of the Ottoman empire. 
Intellectual and social stagnation, the absence of life and 
change, and the adherence to an outlook on the world 
bound up with cults and with magic, were characteristic 
of Orthodox Christendom as of Islam or of Oriental Jewry 
even in the nineteenth century. But now " Europe " is 
penetrating everywhere. On its own soil " Europe " is 
passing through a difficult crisis, embracing all intellectual, 
social, and economic life ; but in the outer world it 
preserves its power of penetration, it seems even to have 
increased it in recent years, to have grown in range and 
intensity, all at a pace never before known in 'history. 
It is a repetition, on an incomparably greater, a world 
wide, scale, of what happened to Hellenism, the conquest 
of foreign countries by the fascination of an intellectual 
system at a time when this system was already passing 
through a severe crisis in the country of its origin. The 
fascination of " Europe " is making itself felt by all the 
world. The backward nations feel that there is only one 
way of salvation for them adhesion to " Europe ". 
Only at the price of this adhesion can they maintain their 
existence and achieve renewal and growth in stature. 
The direction is the same for them all, but the route varies 
according to the situation of each country and people. 
Out of the wealth of varied developments and efforts the 
examples of Turkey, Iran (Persia), and some of the new 
Arab states will be selected as characteristic of the 
developments of recent years in the process of the 
Europeanization of indigenous populations. 

TURKEY 

On October 29th, 1933, the new Turkey celebrated 
the tenth anniversary of its birth. For this occasion the 
citizens of the Republic had to learn the new national 
hymn, the March of the Republic. It runs, in effect : 



230 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

" Oh, what happiness have these ten years been for us ! 
We have set up a new home. The morrow is full of an 
immense hope. We have torn up the wild tares ; we have 
laid gleaming rails. In every struggle the Grhazi is 
at our head. The place of this nation is at the head 
of all." 

This hymn celebrates the great achievement of the 
construction of the system of communications. For 
coming years Turkey has set herself a new task the 
expediting of industrialization. Its purpose is the same 
as that of the corresponding process in the Soviet Union, 
which until recently was a member of the Orthodox 
Christian and Islamic world but now is undergoing a 
process of transformation similar to that of the Oriental 
states, but more rapid. The Five-year Plan of Turkish 
industrialization, published in January 1934, is entirely 
under the influence of the example set by the Soviet 
Union. This plan, too, according to the official statement, 
aims at converting " an economically backward and 
primitive agricultural nation into one of the most highly 
civilized nations of the world ". Here, too, American 
experts are to be brought in to help, and here, too, the 
plan is to be executed under the direction of the state and 
largely with the resources of the state. The agricultural, 
mineral, and industrial potentialities of the country, 
which until now have lain fallow, are to be developed. 
The first Five-year Plan is to be followed by further 
simttaT ones. The economic aspect of Turkey is to be 
revolutionized. Hitherto Turkey was dependent on 
imports of manufactured goods ; now, as in the Soviet 
Union, only the means of production are to be imported* 
the country becoming self-supporting in foodstuffs and 
consumable commodities. In regard to many of these, 
such as sugar, chocolate, woollens, and shoes, this aim has 
already been attained. But the Five-year Plan has far 
more ambitious aims. As a Turkish Member of Parliament 
has declared, it represents Turkey's resolve to be out- 
distanced by no other nation in the world in capacity for 
progress, in activity, and in independence. When the 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 231 

Plan has been carried out Turkey * will possess new 

factories for the production of paper, artificial silk, china 

and earthenware, glass, chemicals, fertilizers, and steeL 

The existing cotton mills, which employed 127,000 workers 

in 1933, are to be added to so that in five years they shall 

employ 350,000 workers. The number of spindles in 

the cotton mills in 1931 was 72,000 ; by 1937 it will be 

300,000. The Turkish textile industry will then be able 

to provide 80 per cent, of the country's requirements of 

cotton goods. Four large new cotton spinning and 

manufacturing mills have been set up. New factories 

have been erected for the manufacture of paper, artificial 

silk, semi-coke, glass, and bottles. The erection of a 

large iron and steel plant near the Zonguldak coalfield is 

planned, to meet the requirements of the country's 

industries and of national defence. Three electricity 

generating stations will supply current to industry and 

to the railways. Mining is to be substantially extended 

and modernized. Railways will open up the principal 

mining areas, such as the copper mines of Ergani, where 

it is hoped to have an output of 10,000 tons in 1936 and 

24,000 tons in 1940 (which would leave a surplus available 

for export), and the Zonguldak coalfield, where the output 

has grown from 70,994 tons in 1884 and 410,000 tons in 

1922 to 2,288,000 tons in 1934. 

An agrarian programme, to supply the country's 
needs of raw material, will be carried out alongside the 
industrial programme. Energetic government action 
has turned Turkey from a grain importing country into one 
with a surplus of cereals. Sugar-beet cultivation was begun 
in 1926 ; already it covers the whole of the country's 
requirements. In these two branches there has already 
been a certain degree of over-production, which has led 
to a restriction of cultivation. State assistance is intended 
to be given for the improvement and extension of the 
cotton crop and the wool clip, so as to cover the country's 
requirements and provide a surplus available for export. 
Thus there is growing in the Near East a busy internal 
economic activity, hitherto unknown, on the European 



232 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

model; the Near East is Europeanizing itself, and in 
doing so is making itself independent of Europe. 

The Turkish Five-year Plan sets the crown on the 
preparatory work that filled the first decade. The Peace 
of Lausanne of July 23rd, 1923, had set up in place of the 
state of the Sultan and Khalif , resting on a medieval 
religious conception of an empire, a modern national lay 
state free from all outside control and all interference 
in its sovereignty. The summoning of Mustapha Kemal, 
the victor in the war of national independence, to be 
President was the external symbol of this change. In 
the place of the legitimist dynasty there came the leader 
who had emerged from the people and was supported by 
the national enthusiasm. The sureness of purpose and the 
ruthless energy of a dominant personality were favoured 
here by the general tendency of the time to subject the 
constitutional, legal, economic and cultural life of the 
people to fundamental transformation. The process 
of Europeanization found a more receptive soil in Turkey 
than in other Oriental countries because there had been 
fifty years of preparatory work among the intellectuals. 
The victorious national campaign had also awakened 
national self-confidence and had created among the 
masses the political and psychological conditions for 
radical transformation. The conduct of the state in the 
new Turkey is similar to that in Italy since 1922 and in 
Germany since 1933 in that it rests on the personality of 
a leader, but in this case the leader was able first to 
satisfy his nation's claims in external policy and drew 
from that achievement the power to proceed to internal 
reforms. In its socio-political structure the Turkish 
constitutional system much more closely resembles the 
Italian than the German. Both were born at about the 
same time, and both belong to the Mediterranean type of 
civilization. The Turkish constitutional system draws 
its programmes and its ultimate aims from the rhythm of 
life and the intellectual system of the nineteenth century. 
Turkey's task (and the same is true of southern Italy and 
the Islands) is to replace the traditional pace of life of the 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 233 

Mediterranean countries, with their primitive agriculture, 
by the rhythm of the industrial north-western Europe 
of the nineteenth century. A close association of all the 
forces of the nation in an intensified nationalism, conscious 
of its distant past (which it magnifies to mythical dimen- 
sions), and turning with indignation from the immediate 
past in which the country was merely a picturesque 
museum exhibit ; the exploitation of all economic oppor- 
tunities by an expanding capitalism with state assistance 
and control ; industrialism and better popular education 
these aims are common to Fascism and the Republican 
People's Party which Mustapha Kemal has created and 
which, as in Italy, is the only party in the state. The 
statutes of this party breathe the spirit of the nineteenth 
century, secularist and liberal, which to-day is penetrating 
the whole of the Near East and is fulfilling everywhere 
the same task as in Europe a century and a half ago, that 
of overcoming the darkness of the religious and feudal 
Middle Ages through the Enlightenment. The first article 
of the statutes runs : " The purpose of the party is a 
government through the people for the people, and the 
raising of Turkey to a modern state." They demand the 
entire separation of religion and politics and the organiza- 
tion of the national community on the bases of present- 
day civilization and the empiric and positive sciences, 
the full equality of rights of all citizens of the state, and 
the removal of all privileges of any class, group, or persons. 
Emphasis is laid on the importance of Turkish cultural 
activity and on the equality of rights of women. 

Thus the Turkish Constitution is radically democratic, 
and the constitutional powers of the President, who in 
point of fact is an absolute dictator, are exceedingly 
restricted. Under the Constitution all legislative and 
executive power is in the hands of the Great National 
Assembly, elected by universal' suffrage. It elects the 
President from among its own members by a simple 
majority of votes ; the Ministry drawn from its member- 
ship is responsible to it ; it decides peace and wax, and all 
treaties of the state, and it can dissolve itself. The 



234 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

President has a veto on laws passed by the National 
Assembly, but his veto is over-ridden by a second passing. 
Thus under the Constitution the popular representation 
in Turkey, which has only one Chamber, is all-powerful. 

But an ingenious mechanism has turned the con- 
stitutionally impotent President into an actual autocrat. 
The Chamber represents not only the will of the people 
but the entirely uniform will of the people. All the 
members of the National Assembly belong to the Repub- 
lican People's Party, whose President under the statutes 
is Mustapha Kemal. The President appoints the Vice- 
President and the General Secretary of the Party, and 
with them forms the Presidential Council, which deter- 
mines who shall be the candidates at the parliamentary 
elections ; its decisions are absolutely binding on all 
members of the Party. The Presidential Council elects 
twelve party inspectors, who are responsible for the 
organization of the Party throughout the state. The 
Republican People's Party, and it alone, has its organiza- 
tion in every centre. Thus the Great National Assembly 
has unrestricted control over the country and is the source 
of all legislation and every state action ; the Republican 
People's Party in its turn has unrestricted control over the 
Great National Assembly, and President Mustapha 
Kemal has unrestricted control over the Republican 
People's Party. He has thus become the sole pillar of the 
whole life of the state. 

Mustapha KLemaPs internal policy, directed to the 
building up of an entirely independent and industrially 
modernized state, rests on three main principles : 
nationalism, secularism, and industrialism. These are 
not new ideas in Turkey. The Ottoman empire formed 
a supernational unit up to 1908, held together by religious 
and dynastic bonds. The head of the dynasty, the 
Sultan, was at the same time the religious head of all 
Mohammedans, the Khalif. His Mohammedan subjects 
were supporters of the principle of his empire without 
regard to their race or language, and Abdul Hamid II, the 
last effective monarch of the Osman dynasty (which in 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 235 

former centuries had produced a series of powerful ruling 
personalities), had tried once more to maintain Islam as 
the basis of the state against the intruding influences of a 
new age. All social and constitutional life in the Ottoman 
empire rested on religious traditions and canonical 
prescriptions. The many non-Mohammedan religious 
communities formed states within the state, living in 
accordance with their religious precepts and usages; 
they were autonomous administrative groups under the 
leadership of their religious head. The rule of the Sultan- 
Khalif rested on a medieval constitutional principle which 
in modern life was an anachronism, a principle which 
could be maintained only through the selfish interests 
and the mutual jealousies of the European Powers. Abdul 
Hamid's romantic and reactionary policy of isolation was 
unable in the long run to prevent the influx of new political 
ideas and forces. Under their impact this empire, which 
had endured for five hundred years, rapidly collapsed. 

The new leaders who succeeded to power, the members 
of the Committee of Unity and Progress, were, like 
Mustapha Kemal, under the influence of modern Western 
political ideas. Their ideal was the temporal national 
state, maintained by the nation united by geographical 
conditions, language, and historic ideals. Thus they 
came into conflict with the religious principles on which 
the empire had rested and with Pan-Islamism, and also 
with the other Mohammedan and non-Mohammedan 
racial groups within the empire. In place of the religious 
" pan ' '-ideal they sought to put one of race and language : 
Pan-Turanianism, under the leadership of the Ottoman 
Turks, was to unite the Turkish races of the Caucasus, 
south-eastern Russia, and central Asia. Enver Pasha, 
who had become Emir of Turkestan, fell fighting against 
the Soviet army in August 1922, in an effort to save out 
of the wreckage of the Pan-Turanian dream and the chaos 
of the world war at least the old home of the Turanians 
in central Asia. 

The Young Turks had vainly sought to create a modern 
national state amid the chaos of a dying empire, torn by 



236 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

nationalist and religious strife and under continual pressure 
from external enemies stronger than itself. After the 
war Mustapha Kemal pursued the same purpose under far 
more favourable circumstances, and carried it into execu- 
tion* He recognized that the Ottoman ideal of the 
state was untenable and the Turanian racial ideal imprac- 
ticable. With his keen sense of realities he confined 
himself to the original Turkish territories in Anatolia, 
and determined to devote his whole attention to the 
Anatolian peasants, who in the past had borne the burden 
of the imperial idea without any return for their devotion. 
Mustapha Kemal would tolerate no rival, and in order to 
secure his personal leadership against any possible opposi- 
tion he dealt terribly in the summer of 1926 with the 
former leaders of the Committee of Unity and Progress. 
Yet Turkey's internal policy after the world war under 
his leadership was only a continuation of the broad lines 
by which the Young Turks had been guided fif teen years 
before. But they had lost the Balkan wars and the world 
war, they had been the grave-diggers of the empire, and 
it seemed as if they were destined to make the very name 
of Turkey fall into oblivion. Mustapha Kemal was the 
victorious leader of the national struggle for indepen- 
dence, and his Turkey was the only one of the states that 
had been defeated in the war which had been able to 
replace a dictated peace by an advantageous treaty of peace 
negotiated between equal parties. This peace also created 
for the first time a Turkey which satisfied all the con- 
ditions for a modern national state. An end was made of 
all foreign control and all interference in the sovereignty 
of the country, which in the past had made all progress 
impossible, as in every country of the Near East. Turkey 
had become in regard to nationality and religion virtually 
a uniform state. The Christian minorities scarcely 
existed any longer. In 1923 there were living in Asia 
Minor a million and a half Greeks, whose forefathers were 
among the original inhabitants of the country and whose 
towns and villages in Ionia and Pontus could boast of 
descent from the old centres of Hellenic civilization east of 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 237 

the Aegean. Together -with the Armenians they had been 
responsible for the modern economic life of the country 
through their alertness, their industry, and their com- 
mercial ability. The forcible exchange of populations 
which began on May 1st, 1923, removed all these Greeks 
to Greece and brought about half a million Moham- 
medans from Greece to Turkey. This made an end for 
all time of the Pan-Hellenic dream of restoring the old 
Greece around the Aegean, a dream which had been 
shattered by the military success of Mustapha Kemal 
in 1922. 

Before this the Armenian problem had been given a 
still more radical solution by sinister means. In Asia 
Minor there are now neither Greeks nor Armenians ; 
the only national minority remaining is that of the Kurds, 
who number about 1,200,000. Mustapha Kemal set 
out to solve the Kurdish problem by ruthless Turkization. 
With his vastly superior army he was able after sanguinary 
battles to suppress the repeated risings of the Kurds in 
defence of their freedom, and to break their spirit, at 
least for a time, by means of drumhead courts martial and 
by a policy of colonization. The modern Europeanized 
national state he had set up had no room for national 
minorities. 

But this modern state could only exist if its productive 
forces were utilized in the interest of the native popula- 
tion. This depended on developing the network of rail- 
ways and communications in the wide and relatively 
thinly populated country, to make possible the exchange 
of goods between its various provinces, with the varied 
production of their different climatic zones and their 
great mineral wealth, and the transport of commodities 
from inland regions to the sea. In the fields of shipping, 
banking, and commerce a campaign was carried on against 
alien ownership and in favour of Turkish control. Turkish 
shipping has made rapid advance ; as lately as 1926 it 
held the fourth place in the port of Istanbul (Constanti- 
nople) ; by 1929 it had risen to the first place. Coastwise 
shipping has been reserved to Turkish vessels. The 



238 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

Turkish flag is also frequently met in foreign ports, in 
the Piraeus and in Alexandria. The improvement of 
Turkish roads is driving out the camel caravans in favour 
of the motor lorry, even in the mountainous regions. 
The aggregate length of roads in 1932 was estimated at 
16,000 kilometres. The railway network had a total 
length of 2,316 kilometres in 1923 and 6,150 in the spring 
of 1931. In November 1935, two new railway lines were 
opened. One, from Irmak to Filios, running 245 miles 
through difficult mountain country, connects the coal- 
basin on the Black Sea coast with the industrial region 
of central Anatolia. The other, from Fevzipasha to 
Diarbekir, is 315 miles long ; it runs close to the Ergani 
copper mines and for the first time opens up the districts 
of Eastern Anatolia and Kurdistan to economic and- 
social development. It will be continued later into Iran. 

On the completion of the railway building programme 
there will be two great lines in Anatolia running right 
across Turkey from west to east. They will be con- 
nected together and with the three sea-coasts by numbers 
of branch lines. There will thus be created a ring of 
railways starting from Ankara, from which lines will 
radiate in every direction, connecting with one another 
and with the heart of the country provinces which, owing 
to the difficulties of communication, have been entirely 
isolated until now. 

Until 1929, when Turkey was able to introduce her 
autonomous tariff, she was like all other Oriental countries 
in importing industrial products, especially cotton piece 
goods and sugar, and exporting raw materials. The new 
Customs tariff aimed at protecting the country's growing 
industries, whose development requires the provision of 
the necessary capital and the awakening of the initiative 
of the population and its interest in technical advance. 
For the initial period the state is affording facilities to 
industry by admitting machinery into the country free 
of duty, by exemptions from taxation, and by subsidies. 
But the great bulk of the industrial enterprises are being 
started by the state itself or financed by it through the 
national banks. In this way the transition from a barter 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 239 

system to that of trade and industrialization is to be 
facilitated, and a staff of organizers and of clerical and 
industrial employees gradually trained to carry out the 
new development among the Turkish people. This in 
turn requires an intensification and rationalization of 
agriculture. The farmer himself can only emerge from 
present conditions and advance to modernized methods 
of farming with the aid of the state, through the provision 
of credit banks and co-operatives, capital and training. 
The transition from an entirely primitive agriculture, 
bound by tradition and trading within the narrowest 
limits, to a rationalized, intensified, mechanized system, 
capable of taking its part in world trade, is extremely 
difficult. The Oriental peasant is intelligent and anxious 
.to learn. But it requires all the care of the state to train 
him in the new mentality required by a more highly 
developed technique and system of farming. The 
government has provided a network of good elementary 
and secondary agricultural schools, has re-organized the 
agricultural bank, has abolished the old tithe tax, has 
founded a central bank for the agricultural co-operatives 
which it is actively promoting, and is planning the erection 
of great repair workshops for agricultural machinery. 

Since 1929 the government has also secured a credit 
balance of foreign trade. The import of many goods 
that can be produced in the country or merely serve 
luxury requirements is entirely forbidden ; on the other 
hand, raw materials, machinery and tools, seeds, and the 
like, may be imported without limit. 

Among the many industrial works started in Turkey, 
textile and sugar mills have taken the first place ; textiles 
and sugar had been the principal articles of import, while 
the country itself produced their raw material. The 
national banks created or re-organized have played an 
important part in the fight against the alienation of trade 
and industry. Among these banks founded and financed 
by the state, apart from the Central Bank, which has the 
privilege of bank note issue, mention may be made of the 
Industrial Bank, the Agrarian Bank, the commercial 



240 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

bank Ish Bankasi, the Sumer Bankasi, and the Eti Bankasi. 
The names of the two last reflect the new Turkish theory 
of history, under which the Turks are descendants and 
cultural heirs of the Sumerians and Hittites. The 
" Hittite Bank " has been set tip primarily for the financing 
of the electrification of the country and the development 
of its internal resources. 

Foreigners are shut out of many occupations in Turkey . 
Turkish is required to be the exclusive business language 
within the whole country. Foreign experts are only 
appointed where no Turks are available with the required 
training, and are made to undertake to train Turks who 
can ultimately fill their place. Provision has been made 
for supplying Turkey within a short period with native 
experts through the re-organization of the Turkish col- 
legiate and technical education system and by sendiqg 
numbers of students abroad. Industrialization has also 
brought to the fore the problem of labour protection 
legislation. New measures under consideration provide 
for progressive regulations on modern lines such as have 
been unknown hitherto in Oriental countries. Rapid 
progress has also been made in recent years in increasing 
the productivity of native labour. 

The Turkish government is also endeavouring to train 
and give settled occupation to a class of industrial workers. 
Many of the measures adopted in the field of education 
and in that of the modernization of public life also serve 
the rationalization and Europeanization of trade and 
industry. The introduction of the Latin alphabet, the 
simplification of the written language, the development 
of the educational system, and the special attention paid 
to occupational training in commercial, industrial, agri- 
cultural, and normal schools have all contributed to raising 
the general level of education. In 1933 there were 
in Turkey 6,733 elementary schools with 10,440 men and 
4,624 women teachers, and with a school attendance of 
366,344 boys and 201,619 girls. In addition there were 
228 secondary and technical schools with 2,081 men and 
1,065 women teachers, attended by 36,891 male and 



OP EUROPEANIZATION ,241 

3,650 female students. The university system was 
itirely re-organized. The old university in Istanbul 
pas closed and a completely new institution opened in 
December 1933, largely staffed by numbers of the leading 
" non- Aryan " professors who had been driven out of 
Germany under the Hitler regime. The agricultural 
^university has also had the advantage of the selection of 
eminent teachers. 

Close co-operation is intended to be maintained 
between scientific research and economic planning. The 
Gregorian calendar has been introduced in place of the 
Mohammedan ; the metric system has been introduced, 
and in May 1935, Sunday was made the weekly day of 
rest instead of Friday, the Mohammedan Sabbath. All 
Turks have been required to adopt family names in place 
of the personal names formerly in use. Mustapha Kemal 
himself took the name of Mustapha Ataturk. The old 
titles, such as Pasha and Bey, Effendi and Hadji, so 
characteristic of the old Turkey, have been declared 
illegal ; Turkish men may only be addressed with the old 
Turkish form of Bay, and women Bayin. Thus class 
distinctions are to disappear in the new democratic 
Turkey, at all events so far as their recognition through 
titles goes. 

For the new Five-year Plan close co-operation is 
envisaged with the Soviet Union. Turkish workers and 
engineers are to go through their training in Soviet Russian 
works. As early as May 1932, Turkey concluded with 
the Soviet Union a credit agreement which is characteristic 
of the tendencies of Turkish economic policy since the 
world war. The Soviet Union granted the Turkish 
government a credit of 8,000,000 dollars for twenty years, 
without interest, on the strength of which Turkey will 
buy machinery for her industries from the Soviet Union. 
The Soviet Union makes its appearance here for the first 
time as a lender and as a country now able to export 
industrial and agricultural machinery and so to help the 
countries of the East which are emancipating themselves ; 
Turkey shows her intention of accepting credits only in 

16 



242 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

order to enable her to procure means of production. 
The credit agreement with the Soviet Union was incor- 
porated in the Five-year Plan for the industrialization of 
Turkey when the plan was worked out in detail. 

Equally with her home and economic policy, Turkey's 
foreign policy is guided by the effort to make a complete 
break with the past. The " sick man " on the Bosphorus 
had been for a hundred and fifty years a plaything of 
European policy, and in his turn had tried to win over 
now one and now another of the states that menagfijii 
him, and to play each off against the others. The new 
Turkey has maintained the freedom and independence 
of its foreign policy, and has steadily pursued a policy 
of peace, in order to assure itself the necessary breathing 
space for years to come for the modernization of the state. 
The neutralization and demilitarization of the Straits 
has diminished the interest of the Great Powers in them. 
On both sides of these Straits, this immemorial bridge 
between Asia and Europe (by which the Entente armies 
suffered a serious defeat in the war), Turkey is still 
planted, to-day in a more real sense a bridge between two 
worlds. 

The country is on terms of close friendship with the 
Soviet Union. It was the attitude of the Soviet Union 
that enabled Turkey to make headway against Europe 
in the difficult years between the Treaties of Sevres and 
Lausanne, and it was the Soviet renunciation of capitula- 
tions and of Russia's concessions in Turkey that prepared 
the way for the country's constitutional and economic 
renewal. When the national revolutions in the Near 
East replaced decayed and corrupt monarchies, 
dependent politically and economically on Western 
imperialism, by the rule of a young bourgeoisie out to 
emancipate itself politically and economically, the Soviet 
Union regarded them, as has already been mentioned, 
as its natural allies in the struggle against Western 
imperialism. In this there was no community of ideas, 
no success for Communist doctrines ; the new states of 
the Near East had actively and successfully prevented 





OF EUROPEANIZATION 243 

ranist propaganda from crossing their frontiers. 
Soviet Union and the states of the Near East, with 
rkey at their head, were united by a community 
interests, both parties being concerned to prevent 
iy return of their past semi-colonial condition, and 
make a complete change in their social condition 
igh the introduction of industrialism and of modern 
sonomic activities. On March 16th, 1921, Mustapha 
Vernal concluded a treaty with Soviet Russia, Article 4 
of which reads as follows : 

" Recognizing that the national movements in 
the Orient are similar to and in harmony with the 
struggle of the Russian workingmen for the new 
social order, the two contracting parties assert solemnly 
the rights of these peoples to freedom, independence, 
and free choice of such forms of government as they 
themselves desire to have. 55 

Her friendship with the Soviet Union did Turkey 
service of the utmost importance in buttressing her 
position during the peace negotiations at Lausanne and 
also on later occasions. But the treaty of friendship, 
which has twice been renewed, does not mean that 
Turkish policy follows in the wake of Moscow's. The 
policy of the two states runs on parallel lines, under the 
influence of a common conception of the independence 
of the peoples of the East. Now that Turkey has 
acquired and is maintaining her entire independence, her 
intention is to remain neutral as between the Soviet Union 
and the Western Powers, while preserving goodwill and 
friendship toward the Soviet Union. She cannot afford 
to endanger this friendship, but she intends nevertheless 
to keep open all the roads to the West. It was in 
accordance with this principle that Turkey became a 
Member State of the League of Nations in July 1932. 

Under the influence of the Soviet Union a loose 
association has also developed between the states of the 
Near East, Turkey, Iran (Persia), and Afghanistan. The 
first of the treaties between these states was signed in 



244 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

Moscow on March 1st, 1921, between Turkey and 
Afghanistan. In this treaty Afghanistan already des- 
cribes Turkey as a model for the national liberation of 
Oriental peoples. Since then the economic and cultural 
transformation of the new Turkey has become the modelt 
for Iran, Afghanistan, and Iraq, and the rulers of these! 
countries, Shah Eiza Pahlevi, King Amanullah, and King 
Faisal, who became the leaders of the national indepen- 
dence movements of their peoples about the same time 
as Mustapha Kemal, have taken that leader and his 
activities as their model. Iraq and the new Arabia, in 
process of creation, which is to embrace the Arabian 
countries, and Turkey and Iran, will form a common 
front in the Near East. It will not be an alliance, but 
there will be mutual obligations of friendship and good- 
will, with which there will also probably be associated 
economic co-operation. For the industries of the neigh- 
bouring Soviet Union the countries of the Near East 
form a natural market, and similarly any expansion of 
Turkish trade must be southwards and eastwards. 

While success was thus achieved in the north-east in 

turning the traditional enmity between Turkey and 

Russia into friendship, there was success also, under 

much more difficult circumstances, in the south-west in 

making an end of the tension between Turkey and Greece. 

For nine centuries Turks and Greeks had faced one 

another as bitter opponents in the struggle for the heritage 

of the eastern Roman Empire ; the years 1919 to 1922, 

with the Greek penetration into Anatolia and the atrocities 

by which it was accompanied on both sides, and 1923 

\vith the vast miseries of the compulsory exchange of 

populations, had further accentuated the old hostility 

and left a legacy of deep embitterment. Nevertheless 

Mustapha Kemal succeeded in 1930 in concluding with 

Venizelos a series of treaties of friendship, which swept 

away all the old differences. The hearty reception 

given in Ankara at the end of October to the Greek 

plenipotentiaries was one of those statesmanlike acts 

which are of epoch-making importance, determining 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 245 

the course of history for centuries to come. The Turco- 
Greek rapprochement was at the same time the 
consummation of the European peace policy which 
Turkey has taken pains to follow in the last dozen years. 

Turkey sought to place alongside the association of 
the states of the Near East an association of the Balkan 
states, to stave off the rival influences of the Great Powers 
from the Balkans, where the old Austro-Russian rivalry 
has been replaced since the war by I^anco-Italian 
rivalry. She succeeded in this through the conclusion 
of the Balkan pact in 1934, and her new r61e, in which 
she has become no longer a passive subject of historic 
change but an active collaborator in it, her strict policy of 
independence and neutrality, has put a completely different 
complexion on the " Eastern question " which filled the 
political history of the nineteenth century. 

Thus the ten years of the new Turkey under the leader- 
ship of Mustapha Kemal have been filled in every field 
with an almost uncanny activity. Like the whole of the 
Near East, and at its head, Turkey has been going through 
the process of advance from one stage of civilization to 
another, a process which deeply affects every manifesta- 
tion of social and personal life and aims at changing men, 
their habits, and their ideas. This is a difficult period 
of transition, full of inconsistencies, weaknesses, and 
inadequacies. The men affected by it are being drawn 
into a whirlpool of uncertainties. They are not finding 
it so easy to penetrate the essentials of Western humanism, 
the intellectual bases of science and research, and they 
are trying first of all to assimilate the things that are 
" practical " ; but all this belongs essentially to the period 
of transition ; these axe symptoms of decay which are 
mixed up with evidences of advance, a fateful process 
with a double aspect, not to be retarded by any regrets 
or any romantic glance backward into the past. In this 
awakening out of centuries of passivity, narrowness, 
lethargy, there lies a creative fresh start. At the same 
time the men of the present day feel a hatred of the 
country's immediate past, which is scarcely yet entirely 



246 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

in the past, a period in which they felt that they were 
despised, exploited, and humiliated, by " Europe ". All 
the stronger is the growth of the desire to make an entire 
break with this immediate past, ignominious as it is felt 
to have been, to enter upon new paths, to take over in 
their entirety the lessons learned from Europe and to use^ 
them for self-protection against Europe. MustapKa 
Kemal is a son of this transition period. Like all great 
non-tragic personalities of history he is an embodiment 
of two elements, the outstanding energy and statesman- 
like ability of the born leader and the tendencies, indepen- 
dent of personalities, at work at a particular period of 
history and serving to shape it. The new Turkey is 
Mustapha Kemal's work, but he was only able to bring 
this work to completion because he undertook the direction 
of tendencies which had been striving for realization for 
a quarter of a century in Turkish as in all Oriental life, 
and allowed his course to be dictated by them, entering 
then upon that course with unerring sureness of purpose 
and with ruthless energy. 



IRAN (PERSIA) 

Turkey has preceded the other Oriental states along 
the path of Europeanization. She was favoured in every 
way, by her geographical situation, which had already 
brought her intellectuals into contact with Europe through 
many decades ; through the victorious war of indepen- 
dence which assured her full sovereignty ; and by the 
character of the people. In Iran, Arabia, Egypt the 
conditions were much more unfavourable. The process 
of Europeanizatkm is thus proceeding more slowly, amid 
many obstacles, and often by indirect means. But in 
these countries also there have arisen leading personalities 
similar to Mustapha Kemal, who have initiated or 
accelerated this process, Riza Shah in Iran, King Faisal 
in Iraq, King Ibn Saud in the Arabian peninsula, Zaghlul 
Pasha in Egypt. Each of them was faced by a different 
situation, different geographically, politically, and 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 247 
psychologically. Each of them had thus to carve out 
his own path. But all of them were instruments of the 
common process of Europeanization. 

Iran is in the most unfavourable geographical situation 
conceivable. It is a basin without an outlet, surrounded 
by high mountain ranges. A large part of the country 
is desert. The permanently settled parts, in which 
agriculture depends on irrigation, are typical instances of 
oasis civilization. The nature of the soil and the climate 
form exceptional obstacles in the way of any development 
of a modern state in the vast but thinly settled country. 
The lack of all modern means of transport prevents any 
closely knit organization of the various tribes and regions. 
The townspeople are Iranians, among whom the national 
movement of recent years has re-awakened the memory 
of their great past. The warlike element of the population 
is formed by the non-Iranian nomad tribes. Since 1927 
the Iranian government has begun gradually to induce 
the nomads to settle, but not until there has been further 
economic and agricultural progress in the country in 
general will it be possible to bring the nomads out of their 
deep poverty, and to incorporate them in the Iranian 
community and associate them in its efforts for economic 
and constitutional advance. 

The difficulties in the way of communication, the 
poverty of the country, misgovernment, corruption, and 
above all the constant external pressure from Russia, 
were the causes of Persia's condition as one of the most 
backward countries of the Near East. The national 
movement which has modernized the state in recent 
years is engaged now in the effort to modernize the 
economic and social conditions of the country. Every 
economic advance is dependent on political and social 
conditions, and these in turn depend on the independence 
of the country, without which the government is unlikely 
to have either the will or the capacity to act in the 
interest of the population, instead of that of foreign states 
or groups. Iran has suffered from her geographical 
situation ever since Napoleon made her a pawn in world 



248 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

policy and world economic activities. Only two states 
had any tangible interests in pre-war Persia Russia and 
Great Britain. Russia was out to incorporate Persia in 
her empire, and pursued this aim by all available political 
and economic means. Persia's history during the nine- 
teenth century and up to the time of the Bolshevist 
revolution is one long story of violation of the country 
by Russia. In scarcely any other country of the East 
or of Spanish America was such ruthlessness and 
unscrupulousness shown as by Russia in Persia. Even in 
the Ottoman empire this would have been impossible ; 
there were other Powers too closely interested, and the 
country was too close to Europe and too open to the gaze 
of all observers. Persia was remote, outside the sphere 
of the immediate interests of the European public, visited 
by comparatively few Europeans, and reached only with 
great trouble and difficulty. Thus Russia had a free 
hand there. The extraordinary poverty of the country 
in capital, the entire illiteracy of its population, the 
fantastic corruption of its officials and of public life made 
it easy for Russia to exploit her own political, cultural, 
and economic superiority. 

The only opponent Russia had to fear was not Persia, 
but Great Britain. Great Britain was interested not in 
the destruction but in the preservation of Persia, in 
order to keep Russia away from India and from the 
Persian Gulf. Great Britain wanted a formally indepen- 
dent Persia under British influence. She did little to 
strengthen or modernize the country, confining herself 
in general to the methods of an economic penetration of 
the sort carried on everywhere by the economically 
stronger Power against the economically weaker. Lord 
Ourzon, who later, as Viceroy of India, exercised decisive 
influence over the Asiatic policy of the British Empire, 
set out to show in 1892, in his book on Persia, which laid 
the foundation of British policy in that country, that 
Persia's interests are Great Britain's interests; "in 
other words, the development of the industrial and 
materialresourcesof Persia, the extension of her commerce, 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 249 

the rehabilitation of her strength, these are the objects of 
British policy.' 5 " Unless, therefore, we are prepared 
to see Persia fall into the plight of Bokhara and Khiva, 
and to concede to a Power whose interests in Central 
Asia may in the future, if they do not now, clash with our 
own, an incalculable accretion of strength, Englishmen 
must be up and stirring, and the preservation, so 
far as is still possible, of the integrity of Persia must 
be registered as a cardinal precept of our Imperial 
creed." 

Great Britain followed this policy until 1907, and 
protected Persia against excessive pressure from Russia. 
In 1907, to strengthen her European position, she 
concluded an agreement with Russia, the price for which 
had to be paid, and soon was paid, by Persia. The whole 
of northern Persia, economically the most fertile and 
politically the most important territory, with the capital, 
fell to Russia, who exercised unrestricted authority in 
this territory both in economic and political affairs. 

Just at that period the Persian national movement 
had begun. The Persians forced the concession of a 
Constitution in 19Q6 ; they were the first Oriental nation 
to do so. The Persian nationalists had gained courage 
for this step in consequence of the weakening of Russia 
by the Russo-Japanese war (in which an eastern nation 
which had only shortly before thei* been organized on 
European lines defeated a European Great Power), and 
of the first Russian revolution, in which a people had 
shown the possibility of rising against despotism and 
corruption and compelling democratic reforms. They 
had also had genuine assistance, before the Anglo-Russian 
treaty, from the Liberal government of Great Britain, 
which had pressed for reform in Persia. But the Persian 
parliament had scarcely assembled and begun to enact 
reforms, and especially to wrest the finances and the 
administration of the country from a chaos of corruption 
and incapacity, when Russia, in league with the autocratic 
ruler of Persia and a section of the Persian aristocracy, 
made all reform impossible. 



250 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

Shortly before the outbreak of the world war the final 
dissolution of the Persian empire and a Russian annexation 
of northern Persia seemed to be imminent. The Persian 
nationalists had shown themselves, in the few years that 
had elapsed since 1906, too weak to cope with the difficult 
situation. 

The situation changed with the Russian Revolution. 
The Soviet government not only gave Persia back her 
independence, but enabled a first beginning to be made 
with constitutional and economic re-organization by 
renouncing Persia's debts to Russia, declaring the 
capitulations and concessions at an end, and restoring to 
the Persian government the Russian state and church 
property in the country. A Cabinet formed by the 
nationalists then came into power, but in 1919 Great 
Britain succeeded in once more forming a pro-British 
ministry, which concluded a treaty with Sir Percy Cox 
on August 9th, 1919. Under this treaty British advisers 
were to be appointed in all the more important govern- 
ment departments, British officers were to train the Persian 
army, British capital was to build the railways and other 
means of communication, and Great Britain was to have 
controlling influence in the revision of the Persian tariff 
policy. Great Britain was prepared to grant a loan, to 
finance the reforms carried out under British supervision. 
Under this treaty Iran would have shared the fate of 
the old Ottoman empire, the only difference being that 
Great Britain would have been placed in a position of 
monopoly. But the victories of the Communists in Russia 
against the White armies and of Mustapha Kemal in 
Anatolia completely altered the situation. A new 
government was formed in Persia under Zia Eddin, a 
nationalist democrat, and Riza Khan, a Persian of humble 
origin who had begun his career as a soldier in the Persian 
Cossack Brigade and had risen to be its commanding 
officer. The new government, which had overthrown the 
pro-British ministry on February 21st, 1921, concluded 
a treaty of friendship with Soviet Russia on February 26th, 
1921, and denounced the treaty with Great Britain on 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 251 

March 8th. A few weeks later the last British and Russian 
troops had left Iranian territory for ever. 

Eiza Khan, a born leader like Mustapha Kemal, had 
won such popularity in Iran through the success of the 
coup tf&at that he soon became the unrestricted leader 
of the country. He, too, in 1924, wanted to set up a 
republic in Iran on the Turkish model, but abandoned 
the plan in view of the opposition of the priests, who 
feared any radical modernization of the country, which 
until then had been shut off from European influences. 
In the autumn of 1925 the Iranian parliament deposed 
the Kajar dynasty, which at the last had had no more than 
a shadow existence. On December 12th, 1925, a National 
Assembly convoked for the purpose elected Eiza Khan 
to be hereditary Shah. He took as the name of his 
dynasty the Iranian name Pahlevi. On March 22nd, 
1935, the Persian New Year's Day, the Persian govern- 
ment declared the ancient name of Iran as the only 
official name of what has hitherto been known as Persia. 

In Iran as in Turkey the Constitution provides that the 
legislative power shall be in the hands of Parliament. 
But the Shah appointed the ministers and provincial 
governors exclusively from among trusted intimates, and 
so set up a personal dictatorship. In Iran, in her more 
primitive stage of development, the process of moderniza- 
tion depends even more than in Turkey on the energy 
and determination of the ruler. The Shah depended from 
the outset mainly on the army, with every branch of which, 
as a soldier who had worked himself up from the ranks, 
he was thoroughly familiar. The first condition both for 
the modernization of the country and for the preservation 
of its independence was the Europeanization of the army. 
For the first time in modern Persian history, the country 
possesses an army which is paid regularly and well and 
is well equipped. The army succeeded in a few years in 
establishing peace and order in the country and in 
turning a loose association of provincial and tribal units 
- into a realm in which it was possible to lay the foundations 
of modern state organization and in which the orders 



252 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

of the central government are carried out. Compulsory 
military service was introduced and was made a reality. 
The army was provided with modern war material, a 
rapidly growing air fleet was developed, special care was 
devoted to the training of officers, and the navy was 
strengthened by ordering new gunboats. More than 
one-third of the Budget is expended on the army, whose 
mobility is the first condition for the reforms in the fields 
of administration, economic life, and education. 

The broad lines of the reforms in Iran follow those 
of Turkey development of communications, moderniza- 
tion of the country's economic system through industrial- 
ization and through the introduction of intensive farming, 
precautions against the alienation of trade and industry, 
the setting up of the country's own financial institutions, 
the introduction of a modern system of elementary and 
higher education with special emphasis on technical and 
industrial training, and the reform of the financial adminis- 
tration and the judiciary, with the abolition of capitula- 
tions and all foreigners' privileges. But the pace of the 
reforms is slower than in Turkey. The country is much 
poorer in capital resources than Turkey, and Iran had 
not already in existence a staff of officials, teachers, and 
judges, trained on modern lines. Riza Shah has shown 
himself a realist in his policy; like Ibn Saud, he has 
taken full account of the existing conditions and the 
limits they set to the scope and the pace of all work of 
reform. None the less, in the last ten years Iran, too, 
has been revolutionized. 

Iran is still in the transition stage from a theocratic 
to a temporal state. In Turkey state and religion have 
been entirely separated. Turkish civilization has cut 
adrift from its historic bases ; the process of moderniza- 
tion has been carried out with much the same radicalism 
as among the Mohammedan peoples of the Soviet Union. 
The abandonment of the Arabic alphabet has made the 
Turk no longer able to read the Koran or the theological 
literature of Islam. Instruction in the Arabic and 
Iranian languages, the study of which was the basis 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 253 

of the whole of the Turk's humanistic education, has been 
abolished. The practice of religion, the services conducted 
by the clergy, have been placed under the supervision of 
the state ; the priest has become an official, no longer 
exercising any influence over the state but dependent on 
it. In Iran, on the contrary, the influence of the priest- 
hood is still very great, and their opposition has so far 
made any radical reform impossible. Islam in its Shiite 
form is still the state religion. The Shah must be a 
member of the Shiite faith, and no law may be enacted 
which is in conflict with the canon law of Islam. Under 
Article 2 of the law of October 7th, 1907, amending the 
Constitution, Parliament must always include among its 
members five mujtdhids (experts in canon law), as only 
they can say whether new laws are in consonance with the 
teachings of Islam. These five members are required to 
be men of proved strength of character and great learning, 
and thoroughly familiar with the needs of their age. 
The chief priests of Iran elect twenty eminent experts 
in the law, and Parliament elects from among these 
twenty the five men who form the Canonical Council to 
which all important projects of law that touch on questions 
of the Islamic faith have to be submitted. 

In his zeal for reform the Shah at first aroused the 
opposition of the clergy, and it was the clergy who refused 
to agree to the setting up of a republic, as they feared that 
the Turkish example would be followed. The Shah 
succeeded, however, in conciliating the clergy and so 
obtaining the necessary consent of this influential caste 
to his mounting the throne. In 1927 he also expressly 
confirmed the privilege of the canonical Committee of 
Five in Parliament. The result has been to introduce 
a certain dualism into Iranian legislation, leading to 
ambiguity and half measures, since the Parliament, in 
order to modernize the administration of the country and 
its trade and industry, is enacting laws based on 
European conceptions, while the Committee of Five has 
to see to the maintenance of canon law, which permeates 
the whole of the country's legislation and the whole 



254 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

judicial system. Thus the process of secularization in 
Iran, which is a constant accompaniment of the modern- 
ization of public life, is being carried out more or less in 
opposition to the traditional religious principles embodied 
in the Constitution ; and the consequence is that some 
laws are not placed before the Committee of Five, under 
a restricted interpretation of the provisions of the 
Constitution requiring this to be done, but the omission 
permits doubt to be thrown on the legality of these laws. 

The ulemas or clergy in Iran are independent of the 
government. The government appoints and pays an 
imam at every mosque to preach and intone the Friday 
prayer, but the principal influence over the population 
is exerted by the mujtahids. Most of these pious and 
learned men live in the Shiite holy places in Iraq, outside 
Iranian territory. Mujtahids are not officially appointed 
but owe their title to the thoroughness of their canonical 
learning, to the depth of their wisdom and the holiness 
of their way of life. Thus the mujtahids and the ulemas 
have an influence which is often applied in reactionary 
directions and against radical reforms. 

The Shah has pursued a path of moderate reform in 
favour of which he has had, in addition to the support 
of the army, that of the overwhelming majority of 
Parliament and of the priesthood. But there are also 
a left and a right wing, supporters on one side of radical 
and democratic reforms and thoroughgoing Europeaniza- 
tion, in whose eyes the Shah is too cautious and too 
autocratic, and on the other side supporters of a con- 
servative attitude, who see in every attempt at reform 
and Europeanization a weakening of Islam and of the 
traditional bases on which they consider that state and 
society should be built up in Iran. But the opposition of 
both these extremes is far too weak to be able to obstruct 
the middle path the Shah has pursued. This path is 
leading Iran cautiously but steadily on the way to 
thorough modernization ; it is permitting the formation 
of a unified national will and the creation of an Iranian 
society which is slowly emancipating itself from its 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 255 

traditional bases and from the antagonisms of families 
and guilds, nomads and town-dwellers, and is working 
towards a unity composed of new sociological factors. 

In its cultural reforms the Iranian government is 
following the example set by Turkey. Numbers of 
Iranian students are being sent abroad every year at the 
cost of the state for scientific and technical study at 
European universities. In 1934 a state university was 
opened in Teheran, for scientific instruction on modern 
lines. It has six Faculties, religion and philosophy, 
science, education, medicine, law, and engineering. The 
old Persian literature is being studied again, and a 
language academy has been entrusted with the promotion 
of the modernization of the Persian language on its 
classic foundations and with the study of the question of 
the introduction of the Latin alphabet. 

The Iranian government has embarked, among other 
things, on dress reform. A national Iranian head-dress, 
the Pahlevi cap, had been introduced in order to give all 
the subjects of the state the sense of unity and common 
citizenship. In June 1935 it was abolished in favour of 
European hats, which are removed from the head on 
entering houses and as a greeting a breach with the 
past Mohammedan tradition. The number of persons 
permitted to wear priest's clothing has been rigorously 
cut down, and the customary titles, forms of address, and 
traditional elaborations of speech have been done away 
with. Thus by 1935 the Iranian reforms have taken on 
a radical character approaching more and more closely 
to the Turkish model. 

Iran's attitude, like Turkey's, in foreign policy has 
entirely changed. Until 1921 her foreign policy was 
entirely passive : she was the plaything of Russia and 
Great Britain. To-day, like Turkey, she is pursuing an 
active policy of independence and peace. In 1928 the 
capitulations were abolished and foreigners were placed 
in every respect on the same footing as Iranians ; the 
country established its full fiscal sovereignty ; the note- 
issuing privilege of the Imperial Bank of Persia, a British 



256 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

financial institution, was withdrawn ; and in February 
1931 the transfer of the telegraph lines of the (British) 
Indo-European Telegraph Company to the Iranian 
government was effected. On her own soil there is no 
longer any limitation of Iran's sovereignty. The govern- 
ment watches jealously over the country's full indepen- 
dence. In view of its memories of no distant past, it 
refused to allow southern Iranian territory to be crossed 
by the aircraft of Imperial Airways on their way to 
India. Only after long negotiations did it concede this 
right for a short period and under burdensome conditions. 
Where the Soviet Union voluntarily renounced all 
concessions in Iran and all rights under the capitulations, 
Iran won her entire independence in her relations with 
Great Britain only through a series of trials of strength, 
from all of which Iran emerged victoriously. 

The last of these was the enforcement of a new 
concession treaty with the Anglo-Persian (now Anglo- 
Iranian) Oil Company in 1933. Iran is interested in this 
petroleum concession, as it represents an important source 
of revenue, and the company's widespread activities 
contribute greatly to the industrialization of the country. 
But here as elsewhere Iran tried as early as 1931 to secure 
increased recognition of the claims inspired by its new 
sense of independence, and to subordinate this British 
company to Iranian control. The conclusion of the 
negotiations in the spring of 1933 brought Iran entire 
success and at the same time greatly strengthened Biza 
Shah in his policy. Iran carried all three of her demands 
the limitation of the area of the company's concession, 
giving the Iranian government a free hand in the granting 
of further concessions ; the increased employment and 
training of Iranians in the extraction of oil, including 
training for the higher posts ; and, finally, the securing 
of increased royalties, independently of the level of oil 
prices. The control exercised by the Iranian govern- 
ment has been strengthened, all workmen, and as far as 
possible the engineers also, must be Iranians, and the 
company is to pay 10,000 a year for the training in 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 257 

England of young Iranian students selected by the 
government. 

In the economic sphere Iran sought co-operation 
with the Soviet Union, and this eventuated in the trade 
agreement of October 1931, on terms advantageous to 
the Soviets. In order to preserve her economic indepen- 
dence and to be able to carry out the modernization of 
her economic system better and on a definite plan, Iran 
followed the example of the Soviet Union and set up a 
state monopoly of foreign trade. Her efforts to attain a 
maximum of self-sufficiency have steadily and greatly 
reduced the volume of her foreign trade. It is difficult 
to get imported goods in Iran. The monopoly of foreign 
trade has led to the conclusion of various agreements 
with foreign trading firms permitting the importation of 
certain goods in consideration of the export of Iranian 
goods to an equivalent value. This has prevented the 
import of luxury goods and other non-essential articles, 
has reduced the flow abroad of the very limited Iranian 
capital, has trained the Iranian public to pay due 
attention to the products of the country's own industries, 
and has permitted the setting up of industries in the 
country without resort to foreign loans. 

The first condition of progress in Iran is to bring it 
into closer contact with the outer world and to develop 
the system of communications within the country. Until 
a little while ago Iran was remote from all important 
routes of communication, and was touched only by two 
seas, one of them an Asiatic inland sea and the other an 
arm of the Indian Ocean. British and Russian railway 
lines ran only as far as the Iranian frontier. The Iranian 
government has now begun the construction of a railway 
to cross the country from north to south, from the Caspian 
via Teheran to the Persian Gulf. It has developed new 
ports at both the terminal points, and it has decided to 
build connecting lines from northern Iran into Iraq, 
Syria, and Turkey, dose connection with the Mediter- 
ranean and so with Europe is to be provided via Beirut, 
which will become Iran's free port. The railway network 



258 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 
will be served by the motor roads which have been built. 
These are an essential preliminary to the intensification 
of agriculture and to industrialization. The lack of good 
roads and railways has hitherto prevented the export of 
crops and import of machinery and has made impossible 
the development of Iran's rich mineral deposits, which 
include coal and iron. The road-building has also enabled 
caravan traffic to be replaced by motor traffic. Imports 
of motor vehicles have steadily increased. In 1924-5, 
529 motor cars and 103 motor lorries and motor buses 
were imported ; in 1928-9, 1,369 cars and 1,783 lorries 
and buses. Of the newly-introduced road-tax half is 
being expended on road construction and half appro- 
priated in aid of the estimates for education and public 
health. The yield of the sugar and tea monopoly is 
assigned to the accumulation of a special railway fund, 
out of which the great railway lines are to be laid down in 
sections. During a period of five years the German 
Junker company has been organizing air traffic within 
Iran ; now the Iranian government intends to follow the 
example of the Turkish and Egyptian governments in 
organizing its own air service through Iranian companies. 
Aviation has made rapid progress in Iran as throughout 
the Near East. 

All this shows the efforts that are being made to bring 
this country, hitherto remote and difficult to reach, into 
touch with the world outside and with modern technical 
progress. Imports of machinery are growing, and with 
the aid of the Iranian National Bank milk have been set 
up for the production primarily of the two principal 
commodities imported into Iran, textiles and sugar. 
The value of the imports of cotton goods into Iran in 
1931-2 was 231,000,000 rials, and of sugar 73,000,000. 
In the following year the imports dropped to 168,000,000 
and 61,000,000 rials. In the same period the imports of 
machinery rose from 33,000,000 to 50,000,000 and of 
motor cars from 45,000,000 to 60,000,000 rials. Since 
1929 agriculture has made very substantial progress 
through the introduction of modern methods, the better 



OF EUKOPEANIZATION 259 

utilization of water supply, the improvement of cattle 
breeding and the combating of the diseases of animals 
and plants. Agricultural colleges and secondary schools 
have been established, and in every province agricultural 
institutes have been set up with experimental stations and 
laboratories, which devote special attention to the 
improvement of tea and cotton culture and to cattle 
breeding and dairy farming. A veterinary college has 
been founded. Special attention is being given to 
afforestation. The industrial programme provides for 
eight sugar mills, to provide the whole of the country's 
requirements ; two had begun working in 1934. The 
programme also includes the establishment of cement 
works and textile mills ; in 1934 there were eight spinning 
mills and three textile manufacturing mills at work. A 
whole series of other works are contemplated in the very 
ambitious programme of industrialization. Already there 
are 17,000 kilometres of roads suitable for motor traffic. 

This programme of rapid development is being carried 
out without recourse to loans : Iran, like most of the 
states of the Near East, has no internal loan and only a 
small foreign indebtedness. But it is accepted, as in the 
Soviet Union, that during a number of transition years 
the standard of living of the population will be affected. 
The Budget has been balanced, the balance of trade is in 
the country's favour, and the three financial institutions, 
the National Bank, which has thirty branches in the 
principal towns, the agricultural bank, and the Pahlevi 
commercial bank, serve as the financial instruments of 
the economic development of the country. 

The Iranian government has not only balanced its 
Budget but carried out a currency reform, transferred 
the privilege of note issue to the National Bank (in which 
only Iranian capital is invested), set up an agrarian bank, 
called into existence a government department of 
industry, and issued a slogan never before heard in Iran : 
" Buy Iranian Goods/' New legal codes have been 
introduced. The number of schools has grown from 
612 with 55,000 children in 1921 to 3,642 with 182,000 



260 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

children in 1932. The expenditure on education has 
been multiplied four times over in the past seven years. 
Every year the Iranian government sends hundreds of 
students to Europe at its own expense, to complete their 
education in the various branches of science, under a 
carefully worked-out scheme. Everywhere there are the 
signs of a fresh beginning, though they are hindered and 
restricted by the continuing influence of the heritage 
from a still recent past. The national consciousness has 
been greatly developed in recent years, though frequently 
it is not matched either by practical ability or by dis- 
ciplined readiness for personal sacrifice. But in recent 
years the foundations have been laid on which, under 
the impulse of the deepening national consciousness, the 
modernization of the country and its economic system 
can be organically and securely developed. 

In the neighbouring country of Afghanistan, where 
the conditions are even more unfavourable than in Iran, 
the first beginnings of modernization have been embarked 
on. In February 1934 an Afghan National Bank was 
founded, with government participation. It has branches 
in London and Berlin. It has been given the privilege 
of note issue, and has been made responsible for the 
organization of foreign trade, of government supplies, 
and of the monopoly in the principal raw materials. 

SYBIA 

The varying forms of the process of Europeanization 
in the Arabian territories of the former Ottoman empire 
may be seen in Syria and Iraq. Conditions were incom- 
parably more favourable for Europeanization in Syria 
than in Iraq. The fertile coastal region of Syria by the 
Mediterranean had long been accessible to European 
influences, which had also penetrated into the four 
important towns in the interior of Syria on the borders 
of the desert. Iraq, on the contrary, is separated from 
the Mediterranean by deserts which until recently were 
virtually impassable for Europeans ; its natural outlet 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 261 

is the Persian Gulf. But in Syria the natives have had 
little active share in the process of Europeanization, which 
wasduetotheinitiativeandtheactivitiesof the Europeans; 
the Syrians themselves have been expending their energies 
during the last twenty years, as they are still doing, on 
the demand for national independence, while the Iraqis 
have won their national independence in recent years 
and have been able to make an energetic beginning on 
this foundation with the Europeanization of their country, 
much more unfavourable though its situation is in every 
respect. There is an entirely different atmosphere in 
Baghdad to that of Damascus or Beirut, an atmosphere 
of initiative, constructive work, and confident activity. 

In Iraq a nation in the modern sense of the word is 
coming into existence ; in Syria religious antagonisms 
dating from the medieval, shackled conditions of the 
immediate past are still alive and at work, and are being 
kept alive by the alien government. Until quite recent 
times the loyalties and the sense of community of the 
inhabitants of Syria were not bound up with their country 
or with the nation, which had no existence whatever in 
the modern sense, but with the religious group. The 
very numerous priests, many of them not very well 
educated, were looked up to with reverence ; they were 
the leaders of the community in political and economic 
matters ; and they represented the rigid and conservative 
element of medievalism, perhaps even more in the 
Christian communities than in Islam. The people held 
tenaciously to their various religious practices and 
customs ; canon law, and the administration of justice 
by ecclesiastical courts, controlled family life. Under 
the Islamic Turkish rule this tendency of the various 
groups to live in isolation from one another and to form 
states within the state was recognized. There was no 
national consciousness, no sense of common citizenship 
of the state, no social intercourse, no common system of 
education. Turkish policy played ofE the various groups 
against one another ; from the nineteenth century, when 
they began to take an active interest in Syria, the 



262 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

European Powers were in no way behind Turkey in this 
policy; and since the war the mandatory adminis- 
trations have even developed this reactionary policy 
further, and have made it the basis of their statesmanship. 
This policy also plays a part in Syria in the adminis- 
trative departments and in the educational system. 
Officials are appointed less on account of their fitness 
for their posts than of the group to which they belong, 
and are often expected to work for the interests of their 
group rather than for the general good of the state. The 
centuries of oppression suffered by Syria under her foreign 
rulers have prevented the population from developing any 
sense of citizenship, and have not contributed to the 
strengthening of character. Not until complete self- 
government is won will self-reliance and initiative be 
awakened, with a consciousness of unity between govern- 
ment and people and a ready acceptance of responsibility 
to the whole community, of which each will feel himself 
to be a member. 

At the same time, before the world war Syria was the 
province of the Ottoman empire which had come most 
of all under European influence. As early as 1649 Prance 
had declared herself the protector of the Catholic 
Maronites ; Maronite priests were educated in Rome and 
Paris. American missionaries began their work in Syria 
in 1821, and in 1862 they decided to found a college in 
Beirut, the first centre of higher education on European 
lines in the Levant. In 1875 the Jesuits followed with 
the founding of the French University of St Joseph; 
they had resumed missionary activities in the Lebanon 
in 1831. Before long French, American, British, and 
Italian missions in Syria, Catholic and Protestant, were 
competing in the field of education, and to some extent 
in medical work. The mission often pursued more than 
merely religious and philanthropic aims ; it formed men 
who remained loyal to the language, the stock of ideas, 
and the political outlook impressed on them at school. 
The states and the cultures to which the missions belonged 
extended their influence in this way in the Near East ; 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 263 

the intellectual impress received by their pupils sub- 
sequently had its effect in the political, economic, and 
cultural fields. Many leaders of public opinion in Syria 
and other countries of the Near East came from these 
schools. The Maronite and other priests and prelates of 
Oriental Catholicism who had passed through St Joseph's 
University became the pillars of French influence in the 
Levant. 

But the European influence also found ways of 
exerting itself politically by direct means. The European 
Powers, in their competition for the extension of their 
spheres of influence, played on sections of the native 
population and engaged their sympathies not only in their 
own support but also as weapons against other Powers. 
The French relied on the support of the Maronites, the 
British on that of the Druses, the Russians on that of the 
Orthodox Christians. This rivalry between the Powers 
exacerbated the existing religious antagonisms, and bore 
the bulk of the responsibility for the sanguinary religious 
struggles of the nineteenth century in Syria and Lebanon. 
After the Napoleonic wars England exerted predominant 
influence in Syria. " The Lebanese had yet to develop 
acute antagonism of creed; and, so long as but one 
European Power, whether France before 1800 or Great 
Britain afterwards, was concerning itself with them at 
one time, they lacked the external temptation to dissen- 
sion which was to offer itself presently. British influence, 
therefore, was doing as yet no more harm in middle and 
south Syria than French interest had done before it ; but 
the fact that two European Powers, with growing and 
antagonistic interests in the Levant, had gained a footing, 
where one alone used to be, foreshadowed danger." 
(Syria and Palestine. Handbook prepared under the 
direction of the Historical Section of the Foreign Office.) 
Lebanon had experienced many struggles before, but 
these had been feudal quarrels, not wars of religion, and 
neither Maronites nor Druses had yet begun to aspire 
to oppress their neighbours with the aid of foreign 
protectors. They soon learned the art in the nineteenth 



264 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

century this art which has produced such fateful results 
in the Near East and a series of violent religious and 
racial struggles turned the Lebanon from 1841 to 1864 
into an arena of incessant bitter tension. The Great 
Powers were united in blaming the Sublime Porte " for 
what had been largely their own work ". Not until an 
autonomous province of Lebanon was set up was this 
territory removed from the interplay of the activities 
of the Great Powers and given assured peace, until, after 
the world war, it was brought once more into the strong 
if not healthy light of European policy in the Levant. 

In Abdul Hamid's time Syria enjoyed special treat- 
ment at the hands of the Sublime Porte. His reactionary 
despotism weighed as heavily on Syria as on the other 
parts of the Ottoman empire ; but Abdul Hamid was 
turning his attention more and more to Asia, and realized 
the value of Syria as the necessary link in a realm it was 
desired to extend to Mesopotamia, Arabia, and Egypt. 
Syria was better provided with railways than were other 
parts of the empire. With the granting in 1888 of the 
concession for the building of the railway from Jaffa to 
Jerusalem, Abdul Hamid began an ambitious policy of 
communications which in the course of the decades that 
followed united Syria by rail with Constantinople and 
gave the country the line from Aleppo via Damascus to 
Beersheba in southern Palestine, with its five branch 
lines to Alexandretta, Tripoli, Beirut, Haifa, and Jaffa, 
uniting it with the Mediterranean. Syrians like Izzet 
Pasha el Abd, the father of the first president of the 
Syrian Republic, were among the most intimate advisers 
of Abdul Hamid, and owing to their influence Syria was 
one of the best-provided parts of the empire, though 
the degree of the provision can only be regarded as 
relatively good, in comparison with the other parts of 
Turkey. 

The strongest influence in the process of Europeaniza- 
tion was that exercised by the foreign schools. It was 
exerted mainly, but not exclusively, over the Christian 
population. Great as was the service done in improving 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 265 

the condition of the population of Syria, the influence of 
the schools had also in the long run fundamental disadvan- 
tages. To this day there are twice as many children 
taught in foreign or private schools in Syria as in the 
state schools. This prevents or delays the growth of the 
sense of unity among the younger population. In many 
schools the teaching is carried on in a foreign language 
unfamiliar to the children, and the country's own 
language, Arabic, is given inadequate attention. This 
works in two directions. The Armenian child who is 
brought up in one of the Armenian schools gains insuffi- 
cient acquaintance with the language of the country 
in which he is to live and work. The Arab child, taught 
in a foreign language, never gains a full knowledge of his 
own, often is unable to read and write properly in it, and 
yet in many cases only gains a superficial fluency in foreign 
languages. In view of the poverty of modern Arabic 
literature, and the lack of scientific books and periodicals, 
the knowledge of European languages is indispensable 
to any higher education, but this necessary knowledge 
of the great languages of civilization is mostly obtained 
at the cost of inadequate acquaintance with the pupil's 
own tongue. This superficial Europeanization produces 
the type of Levantine who over- values the knowledge of 
languages and yet is without a really thorough knowledge 
of them. In the absence of national governments the 
mandatory administrations pay wholly inadequate 
attention to the provision of instruction in the national 
tongue in elementary and higher education ; thus the 
foreign schools continue to be of great importance, as 
they are often the only places in which the native popula- 
tion can gain genuine education and be prepared to meet 
the demands of modern economic life. In 1934 in the 
French mandated territory of Syria there were 2,439 
schools with 218,741 pupils, made up as follows : 

Schools. Pupils. 

State schools _ . . 684 73,689 

Private schools . . . , 1,145 87,157 

Foreign schools . . . . 610 57,895 



266 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

Of the 218,741 schoolchildren in Syria, 118,550 
Christians, and of these only 10,329 attended the state 
schools ; of the 80,815 Mohammedan children, 54,471 
attended the state schools. The state education system 
has only been developed in any substantial degree in the 
Syrian Republic. There are seven higher schools, two 
of them for girls, with 1,404 students in all, and a univer- 
sity, the Arab University of Damascus, which has 
Faculties of medicine, law, and philosophy, and schools 
of pharmacy, dentistry, and midwifery. The teaching 
at this university is in Arabic. The number of illiterates 
in Syria is estimated at about 60 per cent, of the men and 
80 per cent, of the women. In the Republic of Lebanon 
private and foreign schools are in the majority, the state 
schools playing only a small part; there is no higher 
state school, but the country is very well provided with 
private and foreign higher schools and colleges. The 
number of illiterates among the adult population is not 
very different from that in Syria, but almost all the boys 
of school age and about 30 per cent, of the girls go to 
school. 

The methods of teaching in the foreign schools vary. 
In the French schools the children are taught French 
very thoroughly, and especially in Lebanon many of their 
ex-pupils have become entirely French in language and 
culture. There is strong insistence on the children 
speaking nothing but French even out of school; 
instruction in Arabic is neglected, the children are often 
without a real knowledge of Arabic, and Arab literature 
is beyond their reach. The French University, on the 
other hand, has devoted special attention to the study 
of the Arabic language and Arab history, and the members 
of its Oriental Institute and the publications of the Insti- 
tute have done great service to the promotion of Arabic 
learning. The interest centres, however, mainly on the 
past. The French system of education has aimed at 
" Europeanizing " the children and so de-nationalizing 
them. To a Frenchman it seems natural that a Syrian 
should prefer French to Arabic. But in this attitude 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 267 
the Frenchman betrays the characteristic filing of 
" Nordic " racial pride. He is ready to make the 
Syrians French and to admit them as equals into the 
French cultural community. 

The schools of the Jesuits lay stress on the principle 
of the hard, humanistic education of earlier times. Super- 
vision and discipline are exceptionally severe in their 
schools. The Anglo-Saxon schools proceed from other 
principles ; especially so the American University in 
Beirut. The Anglo-Saxon's racial pride leads Him to 
hold aloof from the native cultures, and so he does not 
fall into the error of attempting de-nationalization. 
Special attention is given to English teaching in the Anglo- 
Saxon schools ; English is made to serve as the medium 
of association between European culture and science and 
the natives ; but the pupil is allowed his own tongue and 
his own national origin. It would seem to the Anglo- 
Saxon scarcely natural for a Syrian to prefer English and 
speak it better than his native Arabic. The Anglo-Saxon 
system sets out to introduce the native population to 
modern thought, to form a small 61ite to inculcate the 
new spirit in the masses through their example, as teachers, 
physicians, and writers. 

The awakening of initiative, the strengthening of 
character, training in fairness and truthfulness, the 
inculcation of the sense of responsibility and of service 
to the community are important first steps, especially 
in the Orient, towards any modernization. A spirit of 
tolerance, of enlightenment, of co-operation must be 
brought into play to help to smooth away religious 
antagonisms and to bring into prominence the elements 
of unity. It is just these traits of the liberal and practical 
American Protestantism that have made contributions of 
great value in the forming of the new type of man in the 
Near East. The Oriental has a natural inclination for 
humanist studies and understands their value. On the 
other hand, the upper classes of Orientals despise manual 
work, look down on the professions of farmer and 
industrialist, and are only ready to assimilate sufficient 



268 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

technical knowledge to fit them for official careers. 
Technical education was regarded in the past as a matter 
for charity, enabling orphan children to do something 
to earn their daily bread. Only recently has the necessity 
begun to be understood of training engineers, skilled 
workers, mechanics and foremen. Technical schools 
of the modern type have been started by the Syrian and 
Lebanese governments in Damascus, Aleppo, and especi- 
ally Beirut, but Syria is far behind Turkey and Egypt in 
this field. 

There are still many obstacles in the way of economic 
Europeanization in Syria. A growing section of the 
population have either become entirely Europeanized as 
consumers, or have had the desire aroused in them for 
many elements of the European way of living ; but there 
has been little change in the country's methods of produc- 
tion. This rise in the standard of living without a corre- 
sponding rise in the standard of production is making the 
native population entirely dependent economically on 
the capital and the knowledge of the Europeans. The 
influence of the West has created new needs, but without 
putting the inhabitants of the country into a position 
themselves to carry out a systematic development of the 
country's resources and so to satisfy these increased needs. 
Western penetration has also contributed to the destruc- 
tion of the existing industries through the competition 
of European products and the introduction of new tastes. 

It was impossible for the native industries to with- 
stand the competition of the West. The hand-worker, 
torn away from his traditional methods, was no longer 
able to produce with the needed accuracy. In their 
poverty the Oriental countries demanded cheapness of 
goods rather than quality of finish. The lack of training 
and of good models made itself felt, and also the truly 
Oriental attitude of sovereign indifference " malesh ", 
J " what does it matter ? " The Oriental showed equal 
inaptitude at first for initiative in enterprise, for bringing 
industries into existence. Here there came into play not 
only the contempt for manual work but the reluctance 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 269 

to undertake responsibility, or to take a risk, and the lack 
of organizing ability and of foresight. Undoubtedly the 
great lack of capital plays its part as in other fields. 
The lack of needs among the population adds to the 
difficulty of the attempt to raise the standard of living and 
the quality of output. The taxable capacity of the popu- 
lation is too low to permit of good and comprehensive 
schooling, while on the other hand only education can 
increase the economic aptitude of the population and 
therewith their taxable capacity. The lack of capital 
makes difficult the starting of important enterprises. 
There have been great difficulties in the countries of the 
Levant in uniting in practical business activities the 
capital, ability, and experience of groups of men of initiative. 
The Syrian is individualistic by nature and suspicious, 
especially of his own compatriots. There is a lack of 
readiness for important initiatives and of the capacity 
to wait and slowly to build up on a grand scale, to dispense 
with small gains in order later to secure more important 
ones. Thus the process of Europeanization of trade and 
industry has led in the first place to a weakening of the 
native economic system, stimulating consumption without 
increasing productivity. Often the market has been 
flooded by European commercial agencies, and the 
Syrians have been unable to choose between them or to 
choose what is good for themselves. The native trade 
and industry stood doubly in need of encouragement ; 
the system of capitulations has tended instead to sub- 
ordinate it to foreign trade and industry. The govern- 
ments have done nothing to promote native trade and 
industry. In Turkey, in Iran, and in other countries 
with national governments the situation now is funda- 
mentally different, but the European governments in the 
Levant have not the necessary knowledge and patience, 
and often have not the inclination, to identify themselves 
with the process of modernization of native trade and 
industry. 

Only in recent years has the example of the general 
progress awakened a new spirit of activity in native trade 



270 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

and industry in Syria. The need of co-operation, 
rationalization, and initiative is beginning to be 
appreciated. Native capital is taking a more active 
part in the economic development of the country. Native 
industries are coining into existence with modern equip- 
ment, and technical schools are training staffs of skilled 
native workers. The suspicion of limited liability com- 
panies and other forms of impersonal and supra-personal 
collaboration is being overcome, and native credit insti- 
tutions are beginning to depart from their traditional 
limitation of their activities to bill and loan business, 
and to prepare and promote the founding of industrial 
and trading enterprises. The appreciation of the 
difference between credit for consumption and credit 
for production is penetrating more and more generally 
into the mind of the people. The Egyptian national 
Bank Misr has set up a subsidiary in Syria, the Bank 
Misr-Iiban-Syrie, in which it holds 51 per cent, of 
the shares and Syrian investors 49 per cent. This 
Europeanization is proceeding more rapidly, and with 
state support, in states in which national govern- 
ments have control of economic life. There is developing 
here a neo-Mercantilism reminiscent of the Europe of the 
eighteenth century. In the states administered by foreign 
governments the Europeanization of the native trade 
and industry has to proceed under incomparably greater 
difficulties, without active governmental assistance, and 
accordingly at a much slower rate. 

Syria was always a centre of the textile industry. In 
addition to silk it has its own supplies of cotton and 
wool. There have long been famous textile manufactur- 
ing firms in Syria, doing an extensive export trade with 
their productions. Syria was also rich in other industries. 
Damascus furniture, mostly inlaid in accordance with 
Eastern taste, is famous, and so is the Damascus trade in 
working copper and precious stones into trays and vases 
and ornamented weapons. After the world war the 
advance of Europeanization resulted in a progressive 
decay of the native industries. Oriental clothing and 



OF ETJROPEANIZATION 271 

furnishing began to give place to European, and the 
European styles were subjected to frequent changes of 
fashion, which had not been the case with Oriental 
clothing, or in the segregated women's quarters. Oriental 
industries were unable to withstand the competition of 
European industries with their great capital resources 
and their perfected technique and organization. Only 
in recent years is an industry of modern type beginning to 
replace the traditional crafts ; wholesale production with 
the aid of machinery is replacing the old home industries, 
and new industries are coming into existence to meet 
needs hitherto unknown. The modern industries are 
employing some of the workers who have lost their liveli- 
hood through the dying out of the old ones. But the 
modern rationalized methods require fewer workers, and 
the women are no longer earning the extra money they 
used to be able to make by working at home with the 
help of their children. In the new industries wages are 
higher, especially for skilled workers. Some of the 
workers thrown out of employment are employed on 
public works, road-building, and housing, in which there 
is growing activity. Nevertheless, the changing con- 
ditions in trade and industry are bringing a great deal of 
trouble in their wake, driving large numbers into poverty 
while increasing needs and multiplying the use of money, 
especially where there is no national government to lend 
help. A national government is able to help by reserving 
employment in the new industries to native workers and 
by training them for skilled work. Only state control and 
state investment of capital can remove the material and 
psychological obstacles in the way of the founding of 
modern industries and so place the native consumers in 
a position to meet their needs from native production, 
restricting imports from Europe to the high-quality 
goods in which European industry will for a long time to 
come have a monopoly in the Near East. 

For all that, the Syrians have done notable work with 
their own resources and their own capital, especially in 
the field of electrification. To-day aH the towns and 



272 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

very many of the villages are electrically lit. But a 
further development of industry depends on increased 
returns from agriculture, without which there can be no 
extension of the market for the industries producing 
high-quality products. But this in turn demands funda- 
mental agrarian reform. The existing agrarian system 
stands in the way of any intensification of agriculture, 
as it gives the landholder no security and so deters him 
from making any improvements. The obsolete tithe 
tax also stands in the way of any intensification of 
agriculture. The burden of taxation presses heavily 
on the small farmer, while the prosperous classes in the 
towns escape it almost entirely. The farms are often 
much too small to support even the most meagre existence. 
Native agriculture is without adequate supplies of natural 
manure and has not the financial means for purchasing 
fertilizers. Consequently the yield of the soil is very 
poor. It could be increased by irrigation, where this is 
possible, by manuring, and by better choice of seed. But 
this depends on a reform of the taxation and leasing 
system and the creation of a modern organization of 
credit. Beginnings have been made in this direction in 
Syria. Under a decree of 1926 the great areas of land 
belonging to the state are being split up, the leaseholders 
being given the right to buy their holdings and the purchase 
price being made payable in annual instalments without 
interest. An important advance would be the suppression 
of joint ownership and the formation of co-operatives 
for water supply. The fellah's great lack of capital, 
which puts him at the mercy of the moneylender, can be 
remedied in some degree by agrarian banks, which would 
be responsible for the granting of loans to fanners and 
leaseholders, the supply of cattle, seed, machinery, imple- 
ments and manures on payment by instalments, and the 
purchase of land for dividing up and sale to the peasants 
by instalments over long periods. These agrarian banks 
could be placed on a firm foundation and extended by the 
forming of agricultural co-operatives. 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 273 

IRAQ 

Incomparably more primitive than in Syria are the 
conditions in Iraq, which the first waves of European 
influence reached little more than ten years ago. Syria, 
moreover, had established connection with Western 
culture through emigration. Syrians were living in Egypt, 
North America, South America, and Australia. While 
Abdul Hamid's despotic rule was stifling all progress and 
all freedom of intellectual and cultural life in the Ottoman 
empire, a cultural revival was taking place in the Syrian 
colonies abroad, which were producing the Arabic literary 
renascence and the first symptoms of a modern national 
consciousness. Syrians in Egypt founded the first 
modern Arabic newspapers and reanimated the intellectual 
life of the Nile valley. In America and Europe the 
emigrants frequently acquired wealth, became familiar- 
ized with European customs and economic ideas, and sent 
money home or themselves returned at a later time. 
There was none of this in the case of the inaccessible 
ancient civilization of the Euphrates and Tigris, which 
was sleeping the sleep of the dead. 

The land between the two rivers is alluvial, and, since 
it lies rather below the level of the rivers, it is overflowed 
when the water begins to rise in April, after the melting 
of the snow in the mountains in which they have their 
source. The rainfall in the plain is too small to permit 
agriculture without irrigation. To this extent Mesopotamia 
resembles the other centre of an immemorial human 
civilization, the Nile valley. 

In a country which, in spite of the fertility of the 
alluvial soil, is rainless and exposed to the burning heat of 
summer for eight months of the year, irrigation is the most 
important preliminary to any extension of the area under 
cultivation and to the adoption of any sort of intensive 
culture. The art of irrigation was known to the old 
Babylonians, and brought fertility to the plain, which is 
still covered with remains of the old system of canals. 
Through the canals the two rivers of Mesopotamia have 

18 



274 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

frequently changed their course, even in historic times ; 
when insufficient control was exercised, the water chose 
the canal instead of its previous bed. It is difficult to 
decide how far these canals justify the accounts ancient 
writers give of the fruitfulness of Mesopotamia ; the 
ancient system has not yet been investigated, and it is 
not certain how far the canals were in use simultaneously 
or at different periods. It is evident that the soil has 
become exceedingly impoverished in the course of cen- 
turies by excessive irrigation and lack of manuring, and 
it will need not only a new irrigation system but heavy 
capital expenditure and a great deal of labour to effect a 
partial restoration of its former fertility. A great difficulty 
for any irrigation system has always been that the flood 
that comes with the thaw rushes down with great violence 
and sweeps away embankments and irrigation works. 
Since the Euphrates in its middle course lies higher than 
the Tigris, the ancient canals were often led from the 
Euphrates eastwards to the Tigris. 

In Iraq the irrigation conditions are not the same as 
in Egypt, where high water begins in the late summer and 
continues into the autumn ; flood-time in Iraq is in April 
and May, at the beginning of the very hot and completely 
dry summer, which takes the moisture out of the ger- 
minating seed. In Iraq the grain is sown in November, 
the winter rains bring up the shoots, and the watering of 
the fields from March onwards by means of canals or 
pumps helps the crop to ripen. The usual method is to 
pump the water up from the river to the banks, whence 
small canals distribute it to the fields. The development 
of the oilfields, which has brought a considerable fall in 
oil prices in Iraq, and the good prices the grain fetched 
immediately after the world war, induced many farmers 
to buy and use motor pumps. The number of these had 
grown by the end of 1929 to 2,047, with a total horse- 
power of 54,000, sufficient to irrigate a million acres of 
winter crop. Later, with the disastrous fall in grain 
prices, the demand for motor pumps slackened off greatly, 
and many farmers who were buying on the instalment 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 275 
plan got into difficulties. A system of continuous irriga- 
tion in Iraq would call for lengthy preliminary scientific 
study and the costly erection of dams, weirs, and regu- 
lators. So far, very little has been done in this direction. 
Egypt owes the great fertility of her irrigated land to 
the extensive irrigation works and the careful attention 
devoted to the upkeep of the system and the distribution 
of the water. The work of the British irrigation engineers 
and inspectors has produced important results, on the 
basis of which the Egyptian government can build 
farther. In Iraq the conditions were much less favour- 
able ; the land is too thinly populated, and the financial 
appropriation to the irrigation department was bound, 
in view of the country's poverty, to be inadequate ; great 
irrigation works can only be made to pay it accompanied 
by improved and more intensive methods of agriculture, 
to which the lack of education of the peasants is an 
impediment, and the irrigation system must be kept 
continuously in good order and under control, since in 
Iraq there is a risk of the rapid choking of the canals 
with mud. 

The history of the modern irrigation plans dates from 
1908, when the Turkish government commissioned Sir 
William Willcocks to study the question. In 1911 he 
submitted a comprehensive report, on the basis of which 
the Turkish government carried out two important 
works on the Euphrates, which up to the present constitute 
the principal elements in Iraq's irrigation the TTindia 
dam, not far from Kerbela, and the Habbania reservoir 
at Eamadi. To-day the districts of central Iraq to the 
north-east and west of Baghdad and to the south of the 
TTindia dam are continuously watered by laxge canals 
supervised by the irrigation department. The irrigation 
problem cannot be dealt with separately from the other 
elements of economic and social life in Iraq ; it has to take 
its place in the general work of raising the cultural and 
economic level of the peasant population. It is the basic 
difficulty of the process of modernizing Oriental economic 
life, that particular measures are essential preliminaries 



276 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

to others and at the same time depend on them, that the . 
complex process extends simultaneously into all the 
ramifications of cultural and social life, and that all partial 
attempts and reforms must remain incomplete, because 
they are designed to call into being an attitude and a way 
of life the existence of which is essential to their successful 
introduction. The modernizing process requires firm and 
skilful leaders, thoroughly familiar with and primarily 
regardful of the interests and life of the people. During 
the transition period there is need of the guidance and 
example of European experts, but their work can only be 
successful if they are able to win confidence and produce 
an atmosphere of mutual sympathy. The new conditions 
after the War, the extension of the network of com- 
munications, which now includes even remote districts 
and villages, and the encroachments of machine industry 
have added to the urgency of the modernizing process, 
while the world-wide economic crisis and the fall in the 
prices of agrarianproducts and rawmaterials, on the export 
of which most of these countries depend, have checked and 
retarded the incipient modernization of industry, the 
development of education, and the social advance of the 
people, for which the national governments had been 
working with energy. Their new association in world 
industry and world politics has been the great inspiring 
influence in these countries, rousing them out of their 
lethargy, but it involves dangers to the rapid progress of 
modernization; to overcome these there is need for 
caution combined with wide vision and devotion to the 
welfare of the people. 

The cultivation of the soil in Iraq is even more 
primitive than in Syria ; it is mostly in the hands of semi- 
nomads settled peasants who have nevertheless retained 
the social organization and the legal ideas of the nomadic 
tribe. The peasant in Iraq still thinks in terms of barter, 
preferring to be paid in kind with a share of the harvest ; 
he is mistrustful of planting for the market. The sharing 
system hinders the use of machines which in view of 
the sporsity of population are the one thing needful for 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 277 

extending the area of cultivation and of chemical 
fertilizers, which would raise the production per acre. In 
recent years the intensification of the irrigation has 
caused increased demand for agricultural workers, whose 
wages have risen accordingly. 

The Europeanization of Iraq after the war was made 
possible by two circumstances the turning of the Turkish 
province into the kingdom of Iraq, and the development 
of communications, which brought the country within 
easy reach of the Mediterranean. The kingdom of Iraq 
was a mandated territory like Syria, but the mandatory 
Power in Iraq aimed from the first at creating a sound 
framework for the state, so that in 1932 Iraq was able to 
secure full sovereignty. In Syria the old strife of religions 
and races continues and finds encouragement ; in Iraq a 
unified national consciousness has grown in a short time 
out of a similar difference of religions and races, and has 
especial power with the young, who have much more 
influence over the fate of the country than in Syria. 
Iraq also, unlike Syria, possessed a leader with high per- 
sonal qualities in King Faisal. This son of the desert, 
born in the Hedjaz, was the leader of the " revolt in the 
desert " of the Arab troops in the world war. In an 
extremely difficult situation he succeeded, with unusual 
practical sense and tact, in turning a community of 
primitive tribes and a few towns into a modern state, in 
wresting its independence out of the negotiations with 
Great Britain, and in securing to his country the full 
benefits of modern technical progress. Faisal, whose 
youth was spent among Bedouins, was one of the best 
examples of the effects of Europeanization. Himself 
an ardent Arabian patriot, he succeeded in mediating 
between Europe and the unruly nationalism of his 
followers, and won and kept the confidence of both sides 
in the course of an obstinate and lengthy struggle. He 
knew and in this he was distinguished from most of the 
other Arabian nationalists, and resembled King Ibn Saud 
that what was needed was something more than declara- 
tions and rhetoric, or even conviction and appeal to moral 



278 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

right ; what was needed was constructive activity, a long 
and tireless struggle with recalcitrant interests and 
traditions, a sense of realities, strength of character, and 
endurance. In his use of aircraft, in his negotiations 
with the European oil companies, in his journeys in 
Europe, this son of the desert proved himself a modern 
European ruler. Through him, Iraq has become not only 
an independent kingdom but the nucleus on which the 
hopes are rested of a future union of all the inhabitants 
of northern Arabia in a single state, which alone would 
possess sufficient men, intelligence, and capital to be 
able to carry the process of Europeanization to success. 

Parliamentary life and self-government have welded 
the originally heterogeneous population of Iraq into a 
unit. The only important national minority in Iraq, 
the Kurds, enjoy a position incomparably more favourable 
to their national development than the numerically 
superior Kurdish populations in Turkey and Iran. In 
August 1930 the Iraqi government issued the following 
declaration : " The Iraqi government have, from the 
time when they first took over the effective control of the 
Kurdish liwas, 1 been firmly of the opinion that it is vital 
for the future of the Kingdom of the Iraqi to work for 
the unity of the two peoples and to discountenance any 
proposals which would result in the separation of the 
Kurdish liwas from the rest of the Kingdom. They have, 
however, realized that the Kurds have a strong national 
consciousness of their own, and that success is to be 
gained, not by trying to stamp this out, but by recognizing 
it in such a way that the Kurds may feel, in taking their 
part as Iraqi, th$t their customs, their traditions and 
their language are being preserved intact. 5 ' In the 
Kurdish districts Kurdish is the official language and the 
language of the courts and schools. Kurds are given 
preference in the appointment of officials, and even the 
Arab officials employed must know Kurdish. In the 
Iraqi Ministry of the Interior, and in that of Education, 
there are special departments for Kurdish affairs. On 

1 Regions. 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 279 

being received into the League of Nations, Iraq undertook 
far-reaching obligations in regard to the protection of 
minorities. 

The government of Iraq has concerned itself above 
all with perfecting the army, with popular education, 
and with the creation of modern industries. In 1929 
a law was passed for the promotion of industry : it con- 
ferred freedom from import duties and taxation, and 
assisted with protective duties those industries which 
have favourable prospects of development ; it provided 
that as far as possible government orders should be placed 
with native contractors and Iraqi goods used. In April 
1932 the first national exhibition was opened, to provide 
publicity for the country's products and stimulate its 
industries. The government watches jealously over the 
preservation of the national industries. In its report 
on Iraq to the League of Nations in 1929, the British 
government pointed out that, at the present stage of 
Iraq's development, legislation for the protection of the 
agricultural tenant was much more pressing than legis- 
lation for the protection of industrial workers. In Iraq, 
as in the neighbouring countries, there was a growing 
demand for economic independence and an increasing 
feeling that native industries should be supported by the 
state and by the patriotic citizen against foreign com- 
petition. Thus any attempt by Great Britain to press for 
the introduction of protective labour legislation might be 
interpreted as an attempt to put difficulties in the way of 
the development of a national industry. In 1929, without 
any foreign influence, the first beginnings of the for- 
mation of trade unions and provident societies among 
workmen made their appearance in Baghdad. 

On December 3rd, 1930, the first considerable strike 
took place in Baghdad. The workmen from the railway 
shops, most of whom were members of the mechanics' 
union, went on strike as a protest against the introduction 
of short time employment in consequence of the economic 
crisis. They objected to the reduction of hours bringing 
a lowering of their wages, while the foreign f oremen, 



280 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

who had a yearly contract, were unaffected. The 
Minister of Communications and Public Works received 
a deputation of the strikers, and succeeded in settling the 
trouble. A few days later a Member of Parliament, who 
as a medical man had first-hand acquaintance with the 
conditions of the workers, brought forward a motion in 
Parliament that the Government should be called upon to 
prepare a Labour Protection Law, which should make 
provision for the limitation of working time, the pro- 
hibition of child labour, medical attendance for sick 
workmen, compensation for accidents, the grant of 
invalidity and old age pensions, and payment for holidays 
for men permanently employed. " Defence of the 
worker's right against unjust encroachments by the 
capitalists and preference for native over foreign workers 
in foreign companies " were also demanded. After a 
good deal of discussion the motion was unanimously 
adopted, and referred to the government. The largest 
employers in Iraq are the railways and the Harbour Board 
at Basra, which maintain a forty-eight-hour week for 
their men, and the oil companies, which work some 
fifty hours a week. In all these enterprises the men 
receive medical attendance, and compensation is paid in 
case of accident or death. On the other hand, in the 
traditional small industries the conditions of employment 
are still primitive. 

In view of the shortage of capital in the country, a 
considerable loan would be necessary for any rapid 
economic development. But a past still fresh in men's 
memories has left behind it a strong aversion to any 
external loan, which is suspected as a danger to Iraq's 
independence. Iraq, like Iran, prefers to reduce the 
pace of her economic development rather than make it 
dependent on the foreigner. Yet, considering the great 
poverty of the sparsely populated country, surprising 
results have been obtained in a few years. Baghdad, the 
ancient city of the Khalif s, after centuries of existence as 
a decayed and somnolent provincial town remote from 
international intercourse, is beginning to attract the 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 281 

interest of the Arab world, and to be regarded as a centre 
and metropolis. This change is noticeable in externals. 
The city's energetic and far-seeing municipal authority 
has brought new modern districts into existence with 
astonishing rapidity. The quality of the housing has 
greatly improved, and modern conveniences which only 
a few years ago were entirely unknown are beginning to 
be a matter of course. In the interior of the city new 
thoroughfares have been cut, and many of the narrow 
lanes and alleys have been paved. A wide garden-belt 
is being placed round the city, and a great stadium and 
an entirely modern civil aerodrome testify to the rapid 
infiltration of new life. The public health service and 
the police make a good impression. Like almost all the 
towns in Iraq, Baghdad is electrically lighted. Every- 
where can be traced the energy of renascence. The whole 
of existence is being modernized. An income tax on the 
British model has been introduced, and a special 
Parliamentary Commission is considering the introduction, 
as in Turkey, of a modern code of civil law on the basis 
of the Swiss code. The government of Iraq has called 
in an American and a German expert, who are examining 
the country's requirements in the realm of industry, and 
are above all to assist in working out the syllabus of 
instruction for the new technical and industrial schools 
to be started. 

Progress on a scale unknown in the other Arabian 
countries has taken place since 1931 in the education 
system. Every year many new primary schools are 
opened in the villages, and since 1934 the government 
has borne the expense of sending 100 students a year to 
European universities. Modern methods of education 
are being introduced, and great attention is being paid 
to the training and the intellectual alertness of the 
teachers. At the invitation of the government a com- 
mittee of American teachers, familiar with conditions in 
the East, visited Iraq under the leadership of Paul Monroe, 
and presented a report on the reform and development of 
the education system. 



282 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

Similarly the army has been placed on a new footing 
A law introducing compulsory military service has beer 
passed, and the first recruits were called up in September 
1934. Iraq will thus have an army of twice the previous 
strength at a much smaller cost, and in a few years sub- 
stantial and well-trained reserves. The economies on 
the army are to be devoted to the creation of a strong 
air force. The same object is served by a voluntary 
fund collected by the citizens in the towns. Like Turkey, 
Iran, and Egypt, Iraq possesses native pilots in growing 
numbers, and is planning the introduction of a national 
passenger air service run by a native company, to connect 
Baghdad with Mosul. 

Iraq will shortly be connected with the Mediterranean 
by aircraft, motor car, and railway. Junction with 
the railway systems of Syria and Turkey is only a 
question of a few years. The ancient harbours of the 
Phoenician coast will gain new importance with the 
acquisition of this hinterland. The extension of the 
lines from Iran and Mosul to Beirut will assist in the 
advance of the Europeanization which promotes them. 
Thereby Syria as well, if the government takes appropriate 
measures in the meantime, will regain her ancient impor- 
tance. In the past considerable numbers of sailing vessels 
called at the Syrian ports. This traffic has been greatly 
reduced, and the smaller harbours, used only by coasting- 
vessels, are losing their importance, since the develop- 
ment of motor traffic and the improvement of the high- 
ways permit goods to be brought direct to the main ports 
from the various districts. While Turkish shipping has 
been making steady progress in the last decade, since the 
coasting trade there is reserved for Turkish vessels, the 
shipping industry in Syria has been steadily decaying. 
No attention is paid to the training of skilled seamen. 
Syria, with her long and thickly-populated coast, whose 
inhabitants in ancient days were pioneers of world 
traffic, no longer plays any active part in shipping. 
Improved facilities for loading and discharging in the 
small harbours and the equipment of the sailing ships 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 283 

with auxiliary motors might at least revive the coastal 
traffic. 

Her political situation has prevented Syria from 
playing in the process of Europeanization the part for 
which she is suited by her geographical situation, by the 
fertility of many of her districts, and by the comparatively 
high level of education of a section of her population. 
Once self-government and self -development are assured 
to the country, Europeanization will be able to set in there 
just as in Turkey. The necessary condition for this is 
the growth, which may be observed everywhere now 
among the young, of the spirit of tolerance, of initiative, 
and of co-operation, in order to overcome the traditional 
strife of groups and provinces and the consequences of 
centuries of foreign rule and of lack of education. Iraq, 
through her political independence and the statesmanship 
and ability of King Faisal, has provisionally taken over 
the leadership of the coming Arabian nation, thanks to 
her organization as a state and in spite of the great poverty 
of the country and the backwardness of its inhabitants. 

SAUDI ARABIA 

In contrast with the border territories, the Arabian 
mainland is cut off from cultural and economic inter- 
course with Europe by its position and desert character. 
That is why its connection with the Syrian coast is of 
such vital importance, for even though the " heart " of 
the race is in the desert of Arabia, the essential elements 
of the social and cultural development of an Arab nation 
are contained entirely in the fruitful Mediterranean 
regions, which alone are able to bridge the gulf between 
the life of Europe, so infinitely more intensive and more 
highly developed, and the primitive and conservative 
penury which is all that the deserts and steppes of the 
Arabian peninsula can sustain. Except for a few fertile 
oases, the vast area of the peninsula is inhabited by 
Bedouin tribes. Sandy desert, wild mountains, and 
steppes which are only green for a passing moment in the 



284 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

short spring, alternate with one another, with but few 
wadis dry river-beds during the greater part of the 
year to lend them life. It was not until the decade 
after the war that modernization invaded the desert. 
King Ibn Saud's rule has been the turning-point in the 
history of Central Arabia. With it began the transition 
from the anarchy of the desert and the poverty of nomad 
life to order, the beginnings of civilization, and a more 
productive economic life. The religious fanaticism of 
the puritan Wahhabis was drawn upon to overcome tribal 
particularism, to give the nomads a consciousness of unity 
and of a common mission, and to cement the new order 
by means of their settlement by wells and around mosque 
schools. Ibn Saud aimed at the creation in the desert of 
an Arab kingdom which should acquire a permanent 
nature through the adoption of modern principles of State 
organization. The settlement of the Bedouins as agri- 
culturists around the wells in the desert, working partly 
on irrigated soil, and their introduction to the more 
civilized form of existence made possible by the mosque 
and school in the centre of the settlement, were the first 
steps to an economic and political stabilization of the 
kingdom and to a fight against the appalling poverty and 
ignorance of the Bedouins. In a few years Ibn Saud has 
succeeded in changing their character. !Yom time 
immemorial they were a disturbing element, opposed to 
all settled government, and at the dictates of hunger 
they sought their maintenance in raids, levies on caravans, 
and mutual feuds. To-day exemplary order and safety 
reign throughout the whole of the vast and only thinly 
habitable region; the Bedouin is becoming a citizen, 
and acknowledges the law of the realm as valid for himself. 
Ibn Saud has introduced theaeroplane, wireless telegraphy, 
and the motor car into Central Arabia. The moderniza- 
tion of communications makes possible the maintenance 
of the authority of the state and the gradual moderniza- 
tion of economic life. Plans have been drawn, up for a 
state bank, for the construction of a railway, and for the 
exploitation of mineral resources. 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 285 

It is not only in Central Arabia that the position of 
the Bedouin has become critical owing to contact with 
a new age. Everywhere European civilization, which 
forced its way into the East in the decade after the world 
war, has destroyed the immemorial basis of Bedouin 
life. Until the war, the Bedouins were a match for 
regular armies. With approximately equal weapons, 
they had the advantage of greater mobility and knowledge 
of their country. The aeroplane and the other elements 
of the modern technique of war have changed this 
relationship, entirely to the disadvantage of the Bedouin ; 
a small regular army can ensure order and safety over 
large areas, and raids and levies on caravans, for thousands 
of years a source of income for the Bedouins, are becoming 
impossible. Moreover, the Bedouin lived by breeding 
camels, and the camel, too, is being rapidly and systematic- 
ally supplanted. Everywhere in the Near East the motor 
car is taking its place. The Europeanization of the East 
has confronted the Bedouin with an entirely new situation, 
with which he is unable to cope without the help and 
guidance of the state, which is indeed part-author of this 
Europeanization. The Bedouin has always seized any 
opportunity of settling, of escaping from the poverty and 
insecurity of the desert to the prosperity and security, as 
he sees it, of the agriculturist, and on the border between 
the desert and the fruitful country one finds nomads and 
semi-nomads in every phase of transition from a roaming 
herdsman's life to a peasant's. In Central Arabia, Iraq, 
and Syria, a beginning has been made with efforts to 
furnish the Bedouins with the necessary land and stock, 
initiation and instruction. Thus in Syria in May 1930 
the chiefs of the great Bedouin tribes communicated to 
the High Commissioner their needs in regard to the sinking 
or renewal of wells in the desert, development of the 
medical service, and establishment of an educational 
system. The mandatory Power had already been paying 
attention to the question of providing settled homes for 
the tribes. The Bedouins have provided the labour for 
the sinking of new wells, and the cultivated area has thus 



286 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

been extended. Old Roman canals have been put into 
repair once more, and in the neighbourhood of ruins, 
which prove the fertility in ancient times of many a 
stretch of desert, the Bedouins have begun to till the 
soil. The government has started itinerant schools, 
and policlinics have been established at Palmyra, once 
the centre of a desert empire, and at other places. 
Europeanization has not halted before the life of the 
Bedouin, which has remained unchanged from the time 
of Abraham almost to the present day. If the Bedouin 
means to hold his own in the midst of the new change, 
he also must take an active part in the process of 
Europeanization. 



EGYPT 

Mustapha Kemal and Ibn Saud are soldierly figures, 
but the great Egyptian national leader during this period 
had the stamp of the bourgeois citizen. Saad Zaghlul 
Pasha was already verging on old age when in the autumn 
of 1918, after a long and distinguished but comparatively 
uneventful career, he assumed the leadership of the 
'Egyptian nation, which he held undisputed until his 
death nine years later. Egypt is the typical country in 
which Europeanization materializes in the form of the 
rise of the middle classes and their struggle for participa- 
tion in the direction of the state. Zaghlul Pasha, born in 
a peasant village, received the traditional religious 
education of the Mohammedan scholar of the nineteenth 
century; later, as a barrister and political leader, he 
personified the rise of the more gifted sons of the peasant 
class to the intellectual bourgeoisie of the towns. 

The character of the fellah in Egypt has altered 
remarkably little since ancient times. His attachment 
to the soil (with which he is bound more than almost any 
other peasant), the oasis character of the country, and the 
constancy of the climate have all contributed to this. 
The country is as unique as the people. Egypt is a part 
of the North African desert, in no way differing from it 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 287 

in appearance or in dryness of climate. But it becomes 
unique through the Nile, which, owing to its enormous 
energy, instead of drying up in the desert has converted 
its valley into one great oasis. Long before it enters 
Egypt, from a point where it still has more than 2,000 
kilometres to flow to reach its mouth, it receives no 
further tributaries. It parts with much more water by 
evaporation than it receives from the scanty showers. 
Yet, in an annual rhythm of flood and " low Nile ", it 
converts along its course a thirtieth part of the Egyptian 
desert into the most fertile of garden-land, one of the 
most thickly inhabited regions on earth. The fertility 
of this region does not depend on the amount and dis- 
tribution of the rainfall, but exclusively on the annual 
rise and fall of the Nile. The rise begins with the tropical 
summer-rain in early summer in the region of the river's 
source ; then the Nile overflows the land and deposits 
fertile mud. The whole region was originally swamp ; 
it became the country of the oldest civilization through 
human organization. In the modern system of irrigation 
the supply of mud is so regulated by reservoirs and a more 
even distribution of water that two or more harvests 
can ripen in a year. The irrigation works not only form 
a protection against inundations and keep the river in its 
bed, but distribute the water over the land through 
innumerable canals, extend the cultivable area, and win 
fresh habitable land from the desert. Great dams were 
built in the nineteenth century to hold back the super- 
fluous water during the time of " high Nile " in late 
autumn, and to give it up again during the winter and 
spring until the flood rises once more. 

The Nile is the father of all life and civilization in 
Egypt. In such river-oases the oldest human civilizations 
were developed just because of the problem of irrigation. 
Astronomy had to help to determine the time of arrival 
of the flood season, the art of the land-surveyor had to 
re-establish every year the boundaries washed away by 
the water, careful laws and a good administration had 
to regulate the use of the restricted soil and of the 



288 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

all-important water. The wide stream offered the country, 
which was no more than the river-valley, a convenient 
means of communication, which connected together all 
parts of the country and facilitated the organization of 
the state. 

To-day all the inhabitants of Egypt, Mohammedans 
and Copts (the representatives of the age-old Mono- 
physite sect of Christians), fellaheen, Arabs and Nubians, 
form in their speech and manner of life, as they have 
done for a thousand years, a part of the great Arabic and 
Islamic civilization, which has shown itself in Egypt, as 
elsewhere, a most powerful factor in proselytizing and 
conversion. Alongside them the Europeans play an 
important part, not through their numbers, but through 
their dominant position in finance and industry and the 
privileges conceded to them by the Capitulations. They 
live in their own quarters of the towns, entirely apart, 
without any share in the real life of the country. 

Owing to Napoleon's expedition Egypt was the first 
country in the Near East to be affected by the new spirit. 
The founder of the present ruling dynasty, Mehemet All, 
was an enlightened monarch who tried to re-organize, 
arouse, and modernize the country with a strong hand. 
But until the 'eighties of the last century this moderniza- 
tion had the effect of disintegrating the higher strata of 
society without penetrating into the depths. It was only 
passively that Egypt suffered the effects of a Europeaniza- 
tion that enriched a small upper stratum and a number of 
foreigners and led to the complete disruption of the 
Egyptian finances. Egypt presented the same picture 
as all other Near Eastern countries during this transition 
period. It was only at the beginning of the 'eighties that 
resistance to this form of Europeanization began to be 
offered by the fellaheen, at first in vague and uncompre- 
hending ways ; it was aimed primarily at the Turkish 
ruling class, and gave the British the opportunity of 
occupying Egypt, and so for a long time suppressing the 
emancipation movement. The British administration, 
however, put the country on a higher economic plane 



OF ETJROPEANIZATION 289 

through its thorough modernization of the economic 
and governmental machinery, through the execution of 
great irrigation works, and through its ordering of the 
finances and fight against corruption ; and in so doing 
it indirectly improved the position of the fellah, although 
little or nothing was done for Egyptian education and 
public health. " Praise is due to the British occupation 
for the Five Feddan Law, due to Lord Kitchener, under 
which a landed property of five feddan (about five acres) 
or less cannot be hypothecated; this has contributed 
greatly to the improvement of the lot of the fellah, since 
it put an effective check on usury, which had been gaining 
ground for half a century." (George Schweinfurth.) 
The difficult and dangerous transition from dealing in 
kind to money transactions, which often causes the 
peasants in Eastern countries to incur debt and so forces 
them to sell their property, was facilitated by the British 
administration, which protected the fellah alike against 
the large landowner and the European capitalist. 

During these years there arose from among the 
fellaheen a native middle-class and a native intelligentsia, 
who became the exponents of a modern national eman- 
cipation movement, and who now saw their way much 
more clearly than their predecessors thirty years earlier. 
After the world war, with the wave of nationalism, caused 
by its upheavals, which shot up suddenly throughout the 
Near East, to the astonishment of observers, the move- 
ment, which had previously been confined to the towns, 
spread to the broad masses of the countryfolk, and their 
pressure was successful in wringing from Great Britain a 
formal recognition of Egyptian independence in February 
1922. The leadership of the people was in the hands of 
Saad Zaghlul Pasha, who had sprung from the class 
of the fellaheen and might be considered their best 
personification. The king's opposition to popular 
representation and repeated British interference in 
Egyptian politics hampered the due development of 
Parliamentary life, and the death of Zaghlul in the 
summer of 1927 robbed the popular movement of its 

19 



290 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

great leader, who had won recognition even from his 
opponents. 

About the end of the last century the British adminis- 
tration laid the foundation of an ordered financial and 
industrial development on the European model, and 
thereby made possible not only the economic penetration 
of the country by European capital but also the gradual 
adaptation and elevation of native industry to this 
process. A real Europeanization would have gripped the 
life of the people themselves, but there was none. This 
was due to the alliance of the British administration with 
native reactionary circles, which prevented a thorough 
reform of the traditional Islamic character of the state 
and of the medieval structure of society, as well as to the 
Capitulations, which existed not so much in the interest 
of Britain as in that of international capital. The world 
war, the presence of numerous troops in the country, and 
the extraordinary rise in the price of raw cotton, brought 
an unexpected stream of money into the country and 
increased the value of land many times over. The 
Egyptians now felt able themselves to take in hand the 
modernization of their country ; but they were unable to 
do this as radically as the Turks had done, partly owing to 
the softer character of the people and to the milder climate 
of the lower Nile valley, and partly because they found 
themselves 'constantly checked by their merely partial 
independence and by the Capitulations. 

Finally, in recent years the world-wide industrial crisis 
supervened. It was bound to have an especially powerful 
effect in a country like Egypt, whose one product, raw 
cotton, reacted most sensitively to the state of world 
industry, and, just as in Turkey and Iran, it slowed down 
the realization of all industrial, educational, and social 
plans of reform. But the general lines of development 
are as plainly recognizable in Egypt as in other independent 
countries of the Near East. Here too it is a question of 
active entry into world trade and industry, of emancipa- 
tion from the power of the foreigner in capital as weU as 
in personnel, of the training of the native population in 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 291 

the economic and technical fields, of the building-up of 
native capital and its guidance to productive investment 
in agriculture, industry, and commerce. 

An obstacle in the path of the social and industrial 
development of Egypt, and one which, perhaps, was even 
more serious than the Capitulations, was the lack of an 
independent Customs regime. Since 1884 all goods 
imported into Egypt had paid an ad valorem duty of 8 per 
cent, and all exports 1 per cent. If Egypt made a treaty 
of commerce conferring most-favoured-nation treatment 
on any state, this extended automatically to all other 
states. Egypt could not make any distinction in Customs 
duties between raw materials and luxuries, she could not 
protect a promising native industry, nor could she promote 
the cultivation of important agricultural products. She 
could not distinguish, for the moral and material benefit 
of her citizens, between necessary and less necessary 
imports. The Egyptian market, in this respect a typical 
Oriental market, stood open to every import ; it was 
flooded with inferior goods, which did not educate the 
purchasing public to pay attention to quality and solidity 
of workmanship, as well as with luxuries that tempted 
the purchaser to uneconomical expenditure. The rigidity 
of the Customs system also involved unfortunate con- 
sequences for the state finances. In 1922 the Egyptian 
government tried to negotiate for an alteration in the 
indefensible Customs tariff, but the Powers insisted on 
their " rights " and refused any concession. Egypt had 
thus to wait until February 17th, 1930, when the last of 
the most-favoured-nation treaties expired. Then only 
was it possible for a systematic Egyptian economic policy 
to be embarked on. The new Customs tariff, which 
introduced differentiated ad valorem duties, set out to 
protect native agriculture and promising branches of 
industry, to ensure the supply of cheap raw materials 
and essential articles of consumption, and to put a high 
tax on luxuries. 

Egypt is a country with one product cotton. It is 
the fourth country in the world as regards the quantity 



292 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

of cotton produced, but the first in production per head 
of population. Cotton has made Egypt a prosperous 
country and brought wealth to a small top stratum of the 
population, but what matters is not so much the increase 
in the country's wealth as the distribution of the increase. 
Whether the fellah has been able to improve his standard 
of living materially through the cultivation of cotton is 
doubtful. It is true that exceptional market conditions 
like those of 1919 benefited even the fellah. The price of 
a kantar (124 Ibs.) of Egyptian cotton was 15 dollars in 
1914 and 200 dollars in 1920. In 1914 the mortgages 
totalled E45,000,000 ; by 1920 a third of this had been 
paid off, so that the total had faUen to E29,000,000. 
Erom 1902 to 1914 the value of the cotton crop had 
varied between E15,000,000 and E30,000,000 ; in 1919 
it was E98,000,000. The fellah found himself in a posi- 
tion to buy European imports ; his purchasing power 
rose, although of course the general increase of prices in 
Egypt was very great ; new needs were aroused and, for 
the time, satisfied. All the more crushing was the effect 
of the fall in cotton prices that then came. The fall was 
considerably greater than the fall in other agrarian pro- 
ducts in Egypt. The value of the cotton crop sank in 
1930 to about E20,000,000, the pre-war level. Cotton 
is by far the largest Egyptian export ; the drop in the 
value of this item was not due to a decrease in quantity, 
but to the fall in prices. The quantity of cotton exported 
in 1931 was only 3 per cent, below that of 1929, but the 
export value was 52 per cent, below. 

This dangerous position strengthened the resolve of 
the Egyptians to abandon dependence on this single 
article, to extend the cultivation of cereals for home 
consumption and of fruit and vegetables for export, and 
alongside agriculture to start industries which could 
utilize a part of the cotton crop in the country. As 
recently as 1930 the imports of flour and wheat into Egypt 
still amounted to E2,332,000, of cotton piece goods to 
E5,160,000, of fodder to El,500,000, and of fruit to 
E588,000. Protection, the granting of credits to 



OP EUROPEANIZATION 293 

agriculture and industry, special instruction for tech- 
nicians, tradesmen, and farmers, are the means adopted. 

The Misr Bank may be regarded as one of the most 
important supports of Egypt's economic will-to-live. 
Modern banks were unknown until recently in the Near 
East. In the nineteenth century there were branches of 
foreign banks in Egypt, but their clients were limited 
to the members of the foreign colony whose government's 
interests they represented. These banks were not to be 
found in the provincial towns. It was only with the 
foundation, in 1898, of the National Bank of Egypt, an 
Egyptian company with British capital, that these con- 
ditions began to change. The bank possessed the right 
to issue notes, and served as the government bank ; it 
was thus compelled to open branches in the provincial 
towns. It also called into life the Agricultural Bank of 
Egypt, which undertook the granting of credits to small 
farmers. At first it was very difficult to persuade the 
Egyptian Mohammedans to leave their money in the 
bank at interest. The religious prohibition of interest 
stood in the way, as well as the traditions, centuries old, 
of an eminently feudal and peasant people. Only a short 
time before the end of the last century, the Mufti of Egypt, 
whose learning makes him the acknowledged exponent 
of the canonical law, had to issue a fetwa, a canonical 
decision, to the effect that the investment of money at 
interest was not contrary to the divine law. It was only 
then that a Post Office Savings Bank could be established, 
giving the opportunity after 1890 for the depositing of sav- 
ings through the extension of the Post Offices even into the 
smaller centres. In 1930 there were 354,908 depositors 
with deposits amounting to E2,346,187. But even the 
National Bank of Egypt was foreign both in capital and 
staff, and it did not primarily serve Egyptian interests. 
It was not until 1920 that the first Egyptian bank, the 
Bank Misr, was founded. Its capital was exclusively in 
Egyptian hands ; it employed an exclusively Egyptian 
staff, in order to train them in banking and educate 
them to take responsible positions in economic life ; and 



294 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

it set out, as a participating bank, to establish and 
promote Egyptian industries and trading and transport 
companies. 

The bank was founded in 1920 under the chairman- 
ship of Mohammed Talaat Harb Bey, with a capital of 
E80,000, subscribed by patriotic Egyptians. According 
to the articles of association the shareholders must be 
Egyptians. Subsequent increases brought the paid-up 
capital in 1927 to E1,000,000. In the course of its first 
decade the Bank Misr quickly secured a great influence on 
Egyptian economic life, and it has fully realized the hopes 
of its founders. It has branches in Iftance and Syria, 
and is considering an extension of its activities into the 
countries of the Near East. Many patriotic Moham- 
medans have deposited money free of interest, in compli- 
ance with the religious prohibition of interest ; the amount 
of these deposits is estimated at some E3,000,000. The 
Egyptian government uses the Bank Msr as a central 
bank for the agricultural co-operative societies, and 
grants advances through the bank to Egyptian industry 
and to the cotton planters. Among the industrial and 
commercial companies the bank has founded, which all 
bear the name of Misr, mention should be made of a com- 
pany for cotton spinning and weaving and one for the 
ginning and marketing of cotton. This latter is the 
largest cotton-ginning organization in Egypt, possessing 
six modern factories and ginning annually over a million 
kantars of cotton. The bank has also founded companies 
for silk-spinning, weaving, and dyeing, and a company 
for the export of cotton. These companies serve the 
development of the various branches of the Egyptian 
textile industry. The Bank Misr has also founded a 
river shipping company, an aerial navigation company, 
which trains Egyptian pilots and has started an air service 
between Upper Egypt, Lower Egypt, and Palestine, and 
a shipping company, which since 1934 has maintained a 
regular service of fast passenger vessels between Egypt, 
Naples, and Marseilles. All these companies serve the 
same end and carry out the same idea as the Bank Misr 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 295 

itself the training of the Egyptians in the creation and 
direction of independent industries of their own. 

The emancipation of native trade and industry is 
promoted by various government measures. Thus a law 
of 1927 laid down that at least a quarter of the shares and 
debentures of all joint-stock companies must be issued in 
Egypt and four-fifths of this portion reserved exclusively 
for Egyptians. This provision, however, has hardly been 
put into force yet. The Department of Trade andlndustry 
encourages native enterprises by arranging exhibitions 
of model works and model stocks, by establishing 
laboratories and centres for technical advice and instruc- 
tion, by making efforts to find markets, and by calling in 
European experts. Among the industries which have 
already derived advantage from the protective duties and 
technical assistance are tanning and leather-working, 
glass manufacture, dyeing, and the production of clothing, 
pottery, bricks, tubes, furniture, buttons, footwear and 
sweetmeats. The oil and soap industry for the local 
market has made rapid progress. Three large cement 
factories at Cairo and a smaller one at Alexandria have 
very substantially reduced the import of cement. In 
the years between 1922 and 1931 there has been great 
building activity, public bodies competing with private 
house-owners in extending and beautifying the towns. 
The Egyptian cement factories can now produce some 
400,000 tons annually and thus make the country inde- 
pendent of import from abroad. The same has been true 
since 1931 of Egyptian sugar production. The Egyptian 
sugar refinery company has carried out important irriga- 
tion works in Upper Egypt and increased the area of 
cultivation. 

These are entirely new developments for Egypt. The 
creation and promotion of Egyptian industry was first 
envisaged in 1916 ; in 1920 a Bureau for Trade and 
Industry was started in the Ministry of Finance, and at 
the same time the Bank Misr was founded ; in 1922 there 
followed the establishment of the Federation of Egyptian 
Industries. Since 1927 home products and industries 



296 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

have been given preference in all government contracts, 
provided that their prices are not more than 10 per cent, 
above those of foreign competitors. Egypt is, moreover, 
distinguished among the countries of the Near East by the 
numerous lower, middle and higher schools of industry, 
handicraft and commerce, which have been established in 
recent years with a view to providing qualified native 
staffs in every sphere. An art-craft school has been 
established to revive the once famous Egyptian glass and 
pottery working. 

In 1933 there were no less than 48 secondary schools 
giving practical training in Egypt ; of these 35 were 
occupational schools, 2 engineering schools, 5 commercial 
schools, 4 agricultural schools and 2 schools for fine and 
applied arts. In addition to the Egyptian University 
there were colleges for agriculture, engineering, commerce, 
fine arts and veterinary science. A higher normal school 
trained teachers for the secondary schools and 30 training 
colleges prepared teachers for the elementary schools. 
There were 30 secondary schools under government 
control with 13,722 boy and 1,299 girl students. There 
were also many private secondary schools. A law of 
April 1933, made education compulsory for all children 
between 7 and 12 years of age. 

Egypt imports increasing quantities of machinery, but 
has as yet no engineering industry of her own, only a 
number of engineering and repair workshops. A modern 
working class has developed so far only in the large towns, 
where the first trade unions have been started. The 
workers in the cotton-ginning mills scattered over the 
country are thoroughly primitive, still living entirely 
under village conditions. Economic progress has brought 
heavy migration of Egypt's rapidly growing population 
from the countryside into the towns, and the economic 
crisis has given the country its first experience of 
unemployment of the modern type. This change in the 
social structure has confronted the government with 
entirely new problems, and application has been made to 
the International Labour Office at Geneva for assistance 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 297 

in drafting labour legislation suitable to the altered 
circumstances. 

As with the rest of Egypt's economic life, the govern- 
ment is trying to secure national control of communica- 
tions. Shipping in the Egyptian ports and the air services, 
which since the War have given Egypt a new importance 
in world communications, were until recently entirely in 
foreign hands. The Egyptian merchant fleet consisted 
only of small steamers that traded in the Eastern 
Mediterranean, bringing timber from Galatz and fruit 
from Palestine, Syria and Cyprus. In 1931 the Egyptian 
government made a contract for ten years with the 
Alexandria Navigation Company, and granted it a 
monopoly for the conveyance to Egypt of a large part of 
the purchases of the Egyptian administration and the state 
railways, combined with a premium system in relation to 
the tonnage conveyed. Egypt is thus following other 
countries in adopting a system of state subsidies in order 
to promote the development of a national merchant navy, 
which is to train the Egyptians as seamen and officers and 
show the Egyptian flag in foreign ports. With the 
co-operation of the Bank Misr a Soci6t6 Misr pour 1' Aviation 
has been founded. The government grants it duty-free 
import of machines, has offered prizes at the examination 
of pilots, and has undertaken to bear half the cost of 
insurance and replacements. The company has already 
organized the whole of the inland air service and air con- 
nections with adjoining countries. 

This development was favoured by the good financial 
position that existed from 1913 to 1928, The balance of 
trade was in favour of Egypt in most of these years, and 
left a considerable surplus over the whole period. This 
favourable balance of trade was reinforced by other 
factors, which still further improved the country's balance 
of payments. During the War the large numbers of 
foreign troops spent a great deal of money, and after it the 
stream of tourists set in more strongly than ever. The 
rising wealth of the country expressed itself in the drop in 
debts on mortgage, in the increase in bank and savings-bank 



298 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

deposits, in the purchase by Egyptians of Egyptian 
state loans and other securities, and in the formation of a 
national reserve fund available for the execution of great 
irrigation and other works. The Egyptian public became 
more and more accustomed to money dealings, money was 
placed at interest, and from 1913 to 1926 the deposits in 
the Post Office Savings Bank were trebled. The note 
circulation of the National Bank of Egypt, which at 
December 31st, 1913 amounted to E2,700,000, was 
E31,800,000 at December 31st, 1928. In 1920 only 
31 per cent, of the coupons of the Privileged and 33 per 
cent, of the Unified State Loan were paid in Egypt ; by 
1927 the share of the state bonds owned by residents in 
Egypt had risen to 59 and 68 per cent. Little benefit, it 
is true, came from this growing wealth to the overwhel- 
ming mass of the population, the fellaheen. In spite of a 
high rate of infant mortality the rural population of Egypt 
shows a very rapid increase, and the recent material 
improvement in sanitary conditions will further accelerate 
the natural increase ; it will be many years before the 
first beginnings are seen of the cultural and civic advance 
amid which people think of birth-control. There are not 
enough native industries to give the population adequate 
employment apart from agriculture. The proportion of 
rural to urban population is only slowly changing in favour 
of the latter. The growth of the rural population and the 
constant division of the small properties among heirs has 
produced a steady reduction in the size of the holdings, so 
that even in good years the peasant is hardly able to make 
a living. To this land-hunger is added the rise in land 
prices and rent that has been going on during the British 
occupation of the country, and more than ever since the 
world war. 

The history of the public finances of Egypt has been 
similar to that of most other states of the Near East. The 
policy of borrowing brings the country to the verge of 
bankniptcy, and in the interests of the foreign creditors 
the Powers introduce a strict financial control, putting 
the whole of the revenue and expenditure of the debtor 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 299 

state under the supervision of a Commission, which is 
accorded the right to interfere in all sorts of ways in the 
internal affairs of the state. This condition lasted in 
Egypt until 1904, when the Anglo-French Agreement on 
Egypt and Morocco left none but purely formal functions 
to the Caisse de la Dette and placed the Egyptian financial 
administration exclusively under the control of British 
officials. It was only in 1922 that Egypt secured financial 
autonomy, which was still limited in the most injurious 
manner by the Capitulations. Since 1889, except for 
three years, the Egyptian budget had regularly been 
balanced, deficits being always easily covered out of 
the reserve fund which had been accumulated in the 
years of plenty. The world war almost exhausted 
the reserve. In 1920 the formation of a fresh fund 
began, and the prudent financial policy, continued by 
the independent Egyptian government, had enabled 
this fund to accumulate to over E40,000,000 by 
1930. 

Foreigners in Egypt are only allowed to be taxed on 
their income from real estate ; and the urban industries 
are largely in the hands of foreigners. Thus any direct 
tax on the income of the Egyptian town population would 
still further hamper the native in his struggle for economic 
existence. Consequently the Egyptian taxation system 
is extraordinarily inelastic. It is not possible in Egypt 
for the revenue to be determined and regulated according 
to needs ; so long as the Capitulations stand, needs must 
be adapted to revenue, and this retards the cultural and 
social development of the country. Apart from fees and 
a tax on ginned cotton levied on the factories, the 
government's only important sources of revenue in the 
form of indirect taxation are the Customs and the tobacco 
tax, and in the form of direct taxation the land and 
house taxes. With the exception of the tobacco tax, all 
these revenues are inelastic and uncontrollable. Thus 
the tobacco tax plays much the same part that is played 
in England by the income tax. The result has been, 
however, that the cultivation of tobacco, which showed 



300 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 
great promise, has been forbidden in Egypt. The 
Egyptian cigarette industry works exclusively with 
foreign tobaccos. The question of the introduction of 
new taxes and the increase of the state expenditure is a 
vital one for Egypt. Only so will it be possible to carry 
out within a reasonable period the great plans that have 
already been adopted, and to lay the foundations of a 
new Egypt universal school attendance for boys and 
girls, extension of the public health services, provision 
of drinking-water and consequent improved sanitary 
conditions in all the villages (this is expected to cost 
twenty millions), improvement of communications, and, 
above all, the execution of great irrigation and land 
reclamation works to satisfy to some extent the land- 
hunger of the fellah. After the abrogation of the 
Capitulations, inheritance duties and imposts on banks, 
commercial companies, trades and professions, will open 
up fresh sources of revenue, and, lastly, the expiration of 
the Suez Canal Concession in 1968 will bring a considerable 
addition to revenue. 

The plans of agricultural development which the 
Egyptians have sketched out for the near future have 
already been referred to as a part of the general economic 
transformation the gradual transition from the single 
crop for the world market to a mixed cultivation which 
will cover home requirements and permit of a varied 
export (in view of the climatic conditions there are good 
prospects for the shipment of early vegetables to Europe) ; 
protection of native fruit and cereal cultivation by 
duties ; improvement of the cotton cultivation ; and 
better cultural, social, and economic equipment of the 
fellah through the introduction of compulsory elementary 
education and the extension of technical instruction, 
through sanitary measures, through guidance and 
instruction in agriculture, and above all through the 
organization of an agrarian credit system. In 1931 the 
government founded the Agricultural Credit Bank, one of 
whose duties is to intervene in forced sales to prevent 
the alienation of peasant property. The expenditure 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 301 

on public health has risen from E301,514 in 1910 
to E1,638,689 in 1931. The fellah is an industrious 
worker with few wants, devoted to his home. He usually 
works his ground with only the assistance of his family ; 
where outside labour is employed, the men are often 
engaged for the whole year and paid in kind. The fellah 
generally uses the maize and wheat crop for his own 
needs, and his economic existence depends on the cotton, 
the proceeds of which have to pay his taxes, rent, and 
working expenses. The rent of good cotton soil has 
risen considerably since the War ; the fall in the price 
of raw cotton in recent years made it impossible for the 
tenant to continue to pay this rent, and the government 
has had to come to his assistance with various enactments 
and with the grant of credits. 

The industrialization of Egypt began with the private 
initiative of the newly-arisen middle-class ; the modern- 
ization of agriculture began through the work of the 
co-operative societies. Omar Lutfi Bey founded the 
first urban co-operative in Cairo in 1909 on the Italian 
model, and the first rural one in 1910. His early death 
robbed the movement of its leader, and the societies 
started during the world war collapsed in consequence of 
the lack of suitable legislation and of government support. 
It was only after the attainment of independence in 1923 
that the first legislative measures in this sphere were 
passed ; they were followed by others in 1927. In the 
Ministry of Agriculture a special section for the co-opera- 
tives was created, and many financial privileges and 
other aids were granted to these societies, loans being 
conceded at a low rate of interest. The Ministry devotes 
itself to the propaganda of the co-operative idea, gives 
instruction in starting and ranning the societies, employs 
a number of inspectors and organizers, and issues a special 
newspaper. The co-operative movement not only brings 
material economic assistance to the fellah, but is also of 
great educational value. An association of co-operatives 
is now to take over from the government the duty of 
supervision and assistance. 



302 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

The modernization of Egyptian economic life also 
finds expression in tlie increase in the use of agricultural 
machinery. The import of artificial manure is steadily 
rising. The traditional wooden water-wheel worked by 
animals has been displaced almost everywhere by the 
motor, which soon pays for itself, even on small holdings, 
in view of the high value of land. The growing industries 
and the large number of electrical undertakings need an 
increasing quantity of modern machinery. The raising of 
the Assuan dam will provide a fall of level which will 
represent a large and cheap source of power, sufficient to 
supply the whole of Egypt with electric power. At 
present Egypt does not possess an adequate field for the 
full utilization of the great quantities of current the 
electricity station at the dam will generate. The govern- 
ment has made comprehensive plans to find a market for 
the current as soon as possible by using it for irrigation, 
for urban consumption, for industry, and, later on, for the 
railways. 

Thus the transformation of Egyptian life finds 
expression in every sphere. The Egypt of 1935 is neither 
politically nor economically the Egypt of 1910 or even 
that of 1920. The change is not so drastic as in Turkey, 
but it points unmistakably in the same direction in which 
to-day all the peoples under colonial and semi-colonial 
rule, all the nations which have been permanently or 
temporarily without a history of their own, are beginning 
to develop in the direction of an increasingly active 
participation in the cultural and economic existence of 
mankind, of entry into the great human society, of an 
attempt to take in hand the shaping of their own lives, 
to re-order them under the impact of the paramount 

European civilization, and to give them their due place 
, * 

in it. 

How far the Oriental and with him the South 
American or the Russian or the Chinese will become 
different as a result of this process, how far he will modify 
the European civilization originally adopted by him in 
self-defence and afterwards from inclination, nobody 



OF ETJROPEANIZATION 303 

can say. We are only at the beginning of the process ; 
there is still very strong resistance to it from without, 
from the stronger and more fortunate nations who are 
the beati possidentes, as well as from within, in the form of 
impediments due to history and character, to the lack of 
an intellectual tlite, and to poverty. But the attraction 
of the historical study of our period and of the analysis 
of our times lies in following up and trying to realize the 
spirit of the life which is stirring and surging toward the 
future as it grows that spirit which dominates and 
sways all life, whether life obeys or resists it. 

The ever-closer contact of these very different civiliza- 
tions and forms of life on the basis of a single civilization, 
which is Western European in origin but universal in 
compass and aim, is entering everywhere on its victorious 
course in the most various forms and amid obvious and 
strange contradictions, to shape the mind of man and 
to awaken his initiative. From it there is arising in the 
provinces of the Ottoman empire as in China, in the 
Soviet Union as in South America, even in the steppes and 
plateaux of Central Asia and in Africa, a new mankind. 
It will receive, take over, and transform European 
civilization, the inalienable intellectual inheritance from 
the great historic development which started in Europe 
with the centuries of the Renaissance, of the Enlighten- 
ment, and of the revolutions. In the French Revolution 
a nation realized for the first time that man was living no 
longer in a stable and traditional world but in a changing 
one, the modification of which is the task of man. This 
new consciousness was translated into action and domin- 
ated European political thought and the European 
social attitude in the nineteenth century. The same 
significance that the French Revolution had for Europe, 
the contact with Europe which came of that revolution 
has had for the Near East the recognition of the 
inadequacy of the traditional form, and the awakening 
of the determination to alter it radically. 

With this world-wide spread of an active realization 
of the need of a new age, the present is acquiring in the 



304 METHODS AND PROBLEMS 

East, as elsewhere, a unique and unprecedented signifi- 
cance. Hitherto the past had determined life entirely ; 
generation followed generation in the shackles of tradition, 
working with the same tools and by the same methods. 
To-day the struggle between the generations has set in, 
as it set in some decades ago in Europe ; the present is 
becoming the controlling life-force, transforming men and 
calling them to its service. 

For thousands of years human civilization, split up 
between continents and wide geographical areas, developed 
along entirely separate paths ; to-day for the first time 
spatial and intellectual interconnection is established. 
Mankind as a whole is beginning to confront the same 
problems and needs. What was formerly, even in the 
nineteenth century, the task of separate nations, is 
increasingly becoming the task of mankind. Nationalism, 
which first appeared as a formative principle in history 
in Western Europe, has in the last few decades extended 
its dominion over the whole earth. It stands to-day at 
the height of its power: it rules history and destiny, 
thought and action in all nations, in every latitude and 
clime. 

But for that very reason it no longer seems to suffice 
in the changed situation. In the nineteenth century, 
applied to geographically restricted regions of the social 
and intellectual world, it signified a new order ; but it is 
out of tune with the planetary extent of social and intel- 
lectual life to-day. In a situation which, for the very 
reason that it embraces the whole of the habitable globe, 
is not comparable with anything in the past, all peoples 
without exception share the feeling some in almost 
painful clearness, others in dim presentiments that a 
critical turning point has come for all humanity. All 
have to find a way to subordinate national interest, in 
which the will to live and the lust for power have become 
sovereign and overweening, to the discipline of humanity 
and of the spirit, which alone can give life a meaning and 
save from chaos this age of unexampled portent and 
promise. The entry of the Near East into this age has 



OF EUROPEANIZATION 305 

begun to be an accomplished fact during the last thirty 
years, and this development, with the awakening of 
nations of immemorial age, which had been imagined to 
be long dead and petrified, but which were once the 
centre of the most ancient civilizations on earth, is one of 
the most significant events of the new epoch in human 
history, which started in Western Europe and thence 
took its triumphant way over the whole inhabited earth, 
bringing all men under its spell. 



20 



BIBLIOGRAPHY 

THE following bibliography contains only a selection of 
books which the author found helpful in clarifying the 
various issues involved in the process of the structural 
changes and the Europeanization of the Orient. No 
books are included on the past history of the Mediter- 
ranean countries and the Near East or on specific economic 
subjects like cotton or oil. For a general introduction 
to the nature and history of the Mediterranean countries 
I may refer the student to the admirable book by Alfred 
Philippson, Das Mittdmeergebiet, seine Geographische und 
Kulturelle Eigenart (3. AufL, Leipzig, 1914), to Paul 
Herre, Weltgeschichte am Mittelmeer (Potsdam, 1930), 
which is beautifully illustrated, and to Marion Isabel 
Newbigin, The Mediterranean Lands (New York, 1924). 
An excellent bibliography on the general political and 
economic aspects of Oriental countries is included in 
William L. Langer and Hamilton Fish Armstrong, 
Foreign Affairs Bibliography. A selected and annotated 
list of books on International delations 1919-32 (New 
York: Harper, 1933). 

Neither have I included any books given in the biblio- 
graphies in my History of Nationalism in the East (London : 
Routledge, 1929) and Nationalism and Imperialism in the 
Hither East (London : Routledge, 1932) and in the notes 
in the later book. I have therefore included in the 
present bibliography only a selection of recent books 
dealing directly with the problems of changing civiliza- 
tion, and refer the student for less recent or more general 
books to the bibliographies mentioned above. 

I have not included in the bibliography any articles 
published in periodicals. Much of the most valuable 
material, however, on the Europeanization of the Near 
East is to be found in a number of periodicals, of which 
I should mention first of all Oriente Moderno 9 which has 

807 



308 BIBLIOGRAPHY 

been published as a monthly in Rome by the Istituto per 
I'Oriente since June 1921, and deals with the Near and 
Middle East and Mam in general, and Die Welt des Islam, 
edited for the Deutsche Gesellschaf t fur Islamkunde in 
Berlin by Professor G. Kampffmeyer. Periodicals of a 
more general character are the quarterly Journal of the 
Central Asian Society, published in London, the beautifully 
illustrated monthly Asia, published in New York, which 
frequently publishes contributions by Orientals inter- 
preting the cultural trends of their countries, and the 
weekly -Near East and India, published in London, which 
changed its name in the autumn of 1935 into Great Britain 
and the East. Some missionary periodicals show great 
interest in the impact of Western civilization on Eastern 
lands. Among them I may mention The Moslem World, 
A Christian Quarterly Review of Current Events, Literature 
and Thought among Mohammedans, edited by Samuel M. 
Zwemer, The Missionary Review of the World, and World 
Dominion : an International Review of Christian Progress, 
The Open Court (Chicago) published in 1932 and 1933 a 
monograph series of the New Orient Society, Foreign 
Affairs, a quarterly, published by the Council on Foreign 
Relations in New York, International Affairs, published 
every two months by the Royal Institute of International 
Affairs in London, Pacific Affairs, a quarterly, published 
by the Institute of Pacific Relations in New York, and the 
English monthlies like The Nineteenth Century and After 
and The Contemporary Review, frequently contain relevant 
articles on Oriental problems. The Foreign Policy Associa- 
tion in New York devotes its fortnightly Reports from 
time to time to Near Eastern and Oriental problems and 
countries. The excellent reports on the Near East are 
mostly written by Miss Elizabeth P. MacCallum. 

The student will find much material and discussions 
of great importance in some volumes of Professor Arnold 
J. Toynbee's Survey of International Affairs (Oxford 
University Press), especially in the volumes 1925 
(Volume I), 1928 and 1930 ; in the Educational Tear Book 
of the International Institute of Teachers' College, 



BIBLIOGRAPHY 309 

Columbia University, New York, edited by I. L. Kandel, 
and in the Year Book of Education, edited by Lord Eustace 
Percy (Evans Brothers, London). The Department of 
Overseas Trade of the British Government publishes from 
time to time reports on the economic conditions in different 
countries of the Orient. The governments of Turkey, 
Egypt, Iran, and India and some of their departments 
publish comprehensive yearly statistical summaries and 
reports. The yearly Reports of the Mandatory 
administrations in Syria and Palestine to the Permanent 
Mandates Commission of the League of Nations and the 
yearly Statements Exhibiting the Moral and Material 
Progress and Condition of India are convenient presenta- 
tions from the official viewpoint. 

In the following bibliography the first section contains 
some books on the problem of changing civilizations in 
general and on conditions in Africa especially. The 
student will find for a general discussion of civilization 
the three volumes of A Study of History by Arnold J. 
Toynbee (Oxford University Press, 1934), and for African 
conditions the two volumes on The Native Problem in 
Africa by Raymond Leslie BueU (New York : Macmillan, 
1928), full of suggestions and material. The second 
section lists recent books on the Near East, published 
since the completion of the bibliographies in my two 
preceding books, mentioned above. The third section 
gives some of the recent books on India and the Far East 
which seemed to me to illuminate problems of social, 
economic and intellectual conditions, which are changing 
in India and in the Far East much in the same way 
as in the Near East. In addition the Encyclopaedia of 
the Social Sciences (Macmillan, 1930-5, 15 volumes), and 
the yearly Statesman's Yew Book, edited by Dr. M. Epstein, 
should be consulted for their articles and statistics and 
for their bibliographical lists of recent and older books. 
The Zeitschrift fur Geopolitik (Berlin) has annotated 
bibliographies of recent books on the Near East in its 
issues of February 1931, July 1931 and September 1933. 
The American University of Beirut publishes in several 



310 BIBLIOGRAPHY 

volumes (1933 sq.) A Post-War Bibliography of the Near 
Eastern Mandates (1918-29). As nationalism forms more 
and more the basic elements of intellectual and political 
life in the Near and Far East, the student will find the 
best introduction to an understanding of its implications 
in the two volumes by Carlton J. H. Hayes, Essays on 
Nationalism (New York: MacmiUan, 1926), and The 
Historical Evolution of Modern Nationalism (New York : 
Richard R. Smith, 1931), and a bibliography of books 
on nationalism in Koppel S. Pinson, A Bibliographical 
Introduction to Nationalism (New York: Columbia 
University Press, 1935). The author of the present book 
has in preparation a systematic treatise on nationalism, 
its history and its implications. 



Leonard Woolf : Imperialism and Civilization. (London : Hogarth 
fress, 1928.) 

C. Delisle Bums : Modern Civilization on Trial (New York : 
MacmiUan, 1931.) 

Sir Gilbert Murray and Rabindranath. Tagore : East and West. 
(Paris : International Institute of Intellectual Co-operation, 1935.) 

Nathaniel Peffer : The White Man's Dilemma. Climax of the Age 
of Imperialism. (New York : John Day, 1927.) 

Herbert Adolphus Miller : The Beginnings of Tomorrow. An 
Introduction to the Sociology of the Great Society. (New York : Stokes, 
1933.) 

William Ernest Hocking: JRe-thinking Mission. A Layman's 
Inquiry after One Hundred Tears. (New York : Harper, 1932.) 

Pearl S. Buck : Is there a Case for Foreign Missions ? (The John 
Day Pamphlets, No. 18.) (New York : John Day, 1932.) 

Archibald G. Becker : Christian Missions and A New World Culture. 
(Chicago : Wfflett, dark & Co., 1934.) 

Joseph H. Oldham : Christianity and the Race Problem. (New 
York : Doran, 1924.) 

Erancis S. Marvin (ed.) : Western Saces and ike World. (Oxford 
University Press, 1922.) 

Leopold Levaux : L'Orient et Nous. (Paris : de Brouwer, 1932.) 
Basil Mathews : The Clash of Colour. (New York : Doran, 1924,) 

Maurice Muret : The Tmlight of the White Saces. (New York : 
Scribner, 1926.) 



BIBLIOGRAPHY 311 

Ernst Sucher : Beseitigung der Kolonialmacht. (Wiesbaden : 
Ittede durch Recht, 1927.) 

John H. Harris : Slavery or " Sacred Trust " ? (London : Williams 
& Norgate, 1926.) 

Arnold D. A. de Kat Angelino : Colonial Policy. Two volumes. 
(Chicago University Press, 1931.) 

Aldobrandino Malvezzi : La Politica Indigena NeLle Colonie. 
(Padova : Cedan, 1933.) 

Der Orient und Wir. Seeks Vortrdge des Deutschen Orientvereins> 
Berlin. (Berlin : Walter de Gruyter, 1935.) 

M. Pavlovich : The Foundations of Imperialist Policy. (London : 
Labour Publishing Co., 1922.) 

Hans Kohn : Nationalism in the Soviet Union. (London : Rout- 
ledge, and New York : Columbia University Press, 1933.) 

N. Nikitin : La Literature des Musdmans en U.S.S.JR. (Paris : 
Paul Geuthner, 1935.) 

Thomas Jesse Jones (ed.) : Education in Africa. (New York : 
Phelps-Stokes Fund, 1922.) 

Joseph H. Oldham and B. D. Gibson : The Re-rwUng of Man in 
Africa. (Oxford University Press, 1931.) 

Joseph H. Oldham : White and Black in Africa. (New York : 
Longmans, 1930.) 

Lord Olivier : White Capital and Coloured Labour. (London : 
Hogarth Press, 1929.) 

: The Anatomy of African Misery. (London : Hogarth 

Press, 1927.) 

Charles Roden Buxton : The Race Problem in Africa. (London : 
Hogarth Press, 1931.) 

Allan McPhee : The Economic Revolution in British West Africa. 
(London : Routledge, 1926.) 

G. St J. Browne : The African Labourer. (Oxford University 
Press, 1933.) 

L C. Greaves: Modern Production among Back/ward Peoples. 
(London : AUen & Unwin, 1935.) 

Diedrioh Westerman : The African To-day. (Oxford University 
Press, 1934.) 

Richard C. Thurnwald : Black and White in East Africa : the Fabric 
of a New Civilization. A Study in Social Contact and Adaptation of 
Life. (London: Routledge, 1935.) 

Hilde Thurnwald : Die Schwwrze Frau im Wandd AfriJcas. 
(Stuttgart : Kohlhammer, 1935.) 

Georgina A. Gollook : Sons of Africa. (London : Student Christian 
Movement, 1928.) 

Pannenas G. Mockerie: An African Speaks for His People. 
(London : Hogarth Press, 1934,) 



312 BIBLIOGRAPHY 

Nnandi Azikiwe : Liberia in World Politics. (London : Stockwell, 
1935.) 

C. H. Becker : Educational Problems in the Far East and the Near 
East. (Oxford University Press, 1934.) 

Reinhard Junge : Das Problem der Europaisierung Orientalischer 
Wirtschaft dargestellt an den Verhdltnissen der Sozialmrtschaft von 
Eussisch-Turkestan. (Weimar, 1915.) 



II 

0. H. Becker : Islamstudien. Vom Werden und Wesen der islam- 
ischen Welt. 2 Bd. (Leipzig : Quelle & Meyer, 1932.) 

H. A. R. Gibb (ed.) : Whither Islam ? A Survey of Modern Move- 
ments in the Moslem World. (London : Victor Gollancz, 1932.) 

Eugene Jung : Les Arabes et V Islam en Face des Nouvelles Croisades. 
(Paris : Eugene Jung, 50 Avenue Malakoff, 1931.) 

John R. Mott (ed.) : The Moslem World of To-day. (New York : 
Doran, 1925.) 

L. Levonian : Moslem Mentality. A Discussion of the Presentation 
of Christianity to Moslems. (London : Allen & Unwin, 1928.) 

Henry Elisha Allen : The Turkish Transformation. A Study in 
Social and Religious Development. (University of Chicago Press, 1935.) 

Paul Gentizon : Musta$ha Kemal ou VOrient en Marche. (Paris : 
Bossard, 1929.) 

Dagobert von Mikusch : Oasi Mustafa Kemal. Zwischen Europa 
und Asien. (Leipzig : Paul Last, 1929.) 

H. 0. Armstrong : Grey Wolf : Mustafa Kemal. (London : Barker, 
1932.) 

A]i Shah Ikbal : Kemal, Maker of Modern Turkey. (London : 
Joseph, 1934.) 

Charles H. Sherrill : A Year's Embassy to Mustafa KemaL (New 
York : Scribner, 1934.) 

Jean M61ia ; Mustapha Kemal ou la Renovation de la Turguie. 
(Paris : Fasquelle, 1929.) 

Halid6 Edib : Turkey Faces West. (Yale University Press, 1930.) 

Berthe Georges-Gaulis : La Question Turque. (Paris : Berger- 
Levrault, 1931.) 

Arnold J. Toynbee and K. Kirkwood : Turkey. (London : Benn, 
1927.) 

Sir Telf ord Waugh : Turkey : Yesterday, To-day, and To-morrow. 
(London : Chapman & Hall, 1930.) 

Eugene Pittard : Le Visage Nouveau de la Turquie. (Paris : 
Soci4t6 d'Editions G4ographiques, 1930.) 

P. Di Roccalta : Angora et Kemal Pascid. Problemi Politici ed 
Economici detta Moderna Turchia. (Roma: Society Anonima 
Romana Editoriale, 1932.) 



BIBLIOGRAPHY 313 

Leon Count Ostrorog : The Angora Reform. (University of London 
Press, 1928.) 

Hachim Nabid : Les Symptomes de la Crise Turque et son Remkde. 
(Paris : Librairie Philosophique, 1931.) 

Karl Kruger : Kemalist Turkey and the Middle East. (London : 
Allen & Unwin, 1932.) 

Kurt Ziemke : Die Neue Turkei. Politische Entwicldung 1914-29. 
(Stuttgart : Deutsche Verlagsanstalt, 1930.) 

Oeschichte der turkischen J&epublik. Verfasst von der Gesdlschaft 
zur JErforschung der turkischen Geschichte. (Istanbul : Devlet Matbassi, 
1935.) 

Schewket Raschid: Die Turkische Landwirtschaft ah Qrundlage 
der Turkischen VolksivirtscMft. (Berlin : de Gruyter, 1932.) 

Fritz Adolf Heyersberg : Maschinenvenvendung im Wirtschaftsleben 
der Turkei. (Berlin : Emil Ebering, 1934.) 

K. 0. Reshid Suffet : La Nouvdle Politique Econwnique de la Turquie 
Kemaliste. (Paris : Fresco, 1934.) 

Orhan Conker : Les Chemins de Fer en Turquie. (Paris : Sirey, 
1935.) 

The Turkish Press. Selections from the Turkish Press, showing 
Events and Opinions, 1925-32. Translated and arranged under 
direction of Lutfy Levonian. (Athens : School of Religion, 1932 ; 
London : Kegan Paul, 1933.) 

Basri Gftn Tekin : Le Monde Turc et sa Mission Historique. D&s 
la " premiere humanite de langue turque " jusqu'd, nos jours. (Leipzig : 
Breitkopf & Hartel, 1929.) 

Rosita Forbes : Conflict : Angora to Afghanistan. (London : 
Cassell, 1931.) 

Ali Akbar Siassi : La Perse au Contact de I'Occident. Etude 
Historique et Sociale. (Paris : Leroux, 1931.) 

I. K. Sadig : Modern Persia and her Educational System. (New 
York : Bureau of Publications, Teachers' College, Columbia University, 
1931.) 

Sir Arnold T. Wilson: The Persian Gulf. (Oxford University 
Press, 1928.) 

: Persia. (London : Benn, 1932.) 

0. A. Merrit-Hawkes : Persia 9 Romance and Reality. (London : 
Nicholson, 1935.) 

Fritz Hesse : Persien, JEntwcklung und Qegenwart. (Berlin : 
Zentralverlag, 1932.) 

Arthur C. Millspaugh : The American Task in Persia. (New York : 
Century, 1925.) 

Ahmad Khan Matine-Daftary : La Suppression des Capitulations en 
Perse. (Paris : Presses Universitaires, 1930.) 

Moustaf a Khan Fateh : The Economic Position of Persia. (London : 
King, 1926.) 



314 BIBLIOGRAPHY 



Hans Doevel: Persiens Auswartige 
(Hamburg : Friederichsen, de Gruyter & Co., 1933.) 

Jamal ud Din Ahmad and Mohammad Abdul Aziz : Afghanistan, a 
Brief Survey. (London : Luzac, 1934.) 

Joseph Schwager : Die Entwicklung Afghanistan^ als Stoat und 
seine z^chenstaatlichen Eeziehungen. (Leipzig : Nbske, 1932.) 

K. H. Sorab Katrak : Through AmanullaWs Afghanistan. (London : 
Luzac, 1930.) 

Emil Rybitschka : Im Gottgegebenen Afghanistan. (Leipzig : 
Brockhaus, 1927.) 

Bruno Seifert: Der Anteil D&utschlands an der wirtechaftlichen 
Entwicklung Afghanistan. (Stuttgart : Ausland und Heimat, 1929.) 

Frank Alexander Boss and others : The Near East and American 
Philanthropy. (Columbia University Press, 1929.) 

William Ernest Hocking: The Spirit of World Politics. With 
Special Studies of the Near East. (New York : MacmiUan, 1932.) 

Tahir Khemini and G. Kampffmeyer : Leaders in Contemporary 
Arabic Literature. Part I. (London : Kegan Paul, 1932.) 

J. Achkar : Evolution Politiyue de la Syrie et du Liban, de la Palestine 
et de VIrak. (Paris : Librairie du Foyer, 1935.) 

Paul Ghali : Les Nations d&nch&es de V Empire Ottoman. (Paris : 
Domat-Montchr6tien, 1934.) 

Louis Jovelet : L'Evolwtion Sotidle et Politigue des Pays Arabes. 
(Paris : Geuthner, 1935.) 

Berthe Georges-Gaulis : La Question AraJbe. De FArabie du Soi 
Ibn Saoud a rindependance Syrienne. (Paris : Berger-Levrault, 1930.) 

E. Paret: Zur Frauenfrage in der Arabisch-Islamischen Welt. 
(Stuttgart : Kohlhammer, 1934.) 

Henry XL Hoepli : England im Nahen Osten. Das J&nigreich Irak 
und die Mossulfrage. (Erlangen : Palm & Enke, 1931.) 

A. Nblde : L'Irak, Origines Historigues et Situation Internationale. 
(Paris : Librairie Generale de Droit et de Jurisprudence, 1934.) 

Ernest Main : Iraq. From Mandate to Independence. (London : 
Allen & Unwin, 1935.) 

Henry A. Foster : The MaUng of Modem Iraq. A Product of World 
Forces. (University of Oklahoma Press, 1935.) 

Mrs Steuart Erskine : King Faisal of Iraq. (London : Hutchinson, 
1933.) 

Report of the Educational Inquiry Commission. Survey directed 
by Paul Monroe. (Baghdad : Government Press, 1932.) 

Muhammad FadhelJamali: The New Iraq. Its Problem of JSedouin 
Education. (New York : Bureau of Publications, Teachers' College, 
Columbia University, 1934.) 

Sir Edward Hilton Young : Report on Economic Conditions and 
PoUcy. (Baghdad : Government Press, 1930.) 



BIBLIOGRAPHY 315 

Social Survey of Syria. (Beirut : American University, 1926.) 
(Not printed.) 

Raymond O'Zouk : Les Etats du Levant s&us Mandat Franpais. 
(Paris : Larose, 1931.) 

M. Farid Zeineddine : Le Regime du Controle des Mandate de la 
Societe des Nations. (Paris : Les Presses Universitaires, 1933.) 

Walter Holmes Ritscher : Criteria of Capacity for Independence. 
(American University of Beirut.) (Jerusalem : Syrian Orphanage 
Press, 1934.) 

Stuart Carter Dodd : A Controlled Experiment on Rural Hygiene in 
Syria. (Beirut : American University, 1934.) 

Alfred Bonne : Paldstina. Land und WirtecJiaft. (Leipzig : 
Deutsche Wissenschaftliche Buchhandlung, 1932.) 

Harry Viteles and Khalil Totah (ed.) : Palestine, a Decade of 
Development. (Philadelphia : The American Academy of Political and 
Social Science, 1932.) 

Lewis IVench : Reports on Agricultural Development and Land 
Settlement in Palestine. (London : Crown Agents for the Colonies, 
1932.) 

Mrs Steuart Erskine : Palestine of the Arabs. (London : Harrap, 
1935.) 

Anis Saghir : Le Sionisme et le Mandat Anglais en Palestine. (Paris : 
Les Presses Universitaires, 1932.) 

Norman Bentwich : England in Palestine. (London : Kegan 
Paul, 1932.) 

Antoine Zischka : Ibn Seoud. (Paris : Payot, 1934.) 

H. C. Armstrong : Lord of Arabia, Ibn Saud. An Intimate Study 
of a King. (London : 1934.) 

Kenneth Williams : Ibn Saud, the Puritan King of Arabia. (London : 
Jonathan Cape, 1933.) 

Rupert Donkan : Die Auferstehung Arabiens. Ibn Bauds Weg und 
Ziel (Leipzig: Wilhelm Goldmann, 1935.) 

H. de Monfreid : Les Derniers Jours de VArahie H&ureuse. (Paris : 
1935.) 

D. van der Meulen and H. von Wissmann : Badramaut, Some of 
its Mysteries Unveiled. (Leyden : E. J, BriU, 1932.) 

Taha Hussein: An Egyptian Childhood. The Autobiography of 
T.H. (London: Routledge, 1932.) 

C. Charles Adams : Islam and Modernism in Egypt. A Study of 
Modern Reform Movement Inaugurated by Mohammad Abduh. (Oxford 
University Press, 1933.) 

Lord Lloyd of Dolobran: Egypt since Grower. Two volumes. 
(London: Macmillan, 1933, 1934.) 

Sir Arnold T. Wilson : The Sues Canal. (Oxford University Press, 
1934.) 



316 BIBLIOGRAPHY 

Moustapha Sabry : Le Pouvoir Legislatif el le Pouvoir Executif en 
Egypte. (Paris : Meohelinck, 1930.) 

El Sayed Hassan : Essai sur une Orientation Nouvette de VEconomie 
Egyptienne. (Toulouse: Vialelle, 1928.) 

A. Soliman : L 9 Industrialization de I'Egypte. (Paris : Geuthner, 
1933.) 

Mohammed Ali Rif aat : The Monetary System of Egypt. (London : 
Allen & Unwin, 1935.) 

Siegfried Passarge : Agypten und der arabische Orient. (Berlin : 
Zentralverlag, 1931.) 

Ill 

Ereda M. Houlston and B, P. L. Bedi (ed.) : India Analysed. Four 
volumes. (London : Victor Gollancz, 1933-5.) 

Congress Presidential Addresses from the Silver to the Golden Jubilee 
(1911-34). (Madras : Natesan, 1934.) 

F. M. de Mello : The Indian National Congress. (Oxford University 
Press, 1934.) 

K V. Eamasubrahmanyam : The Evolution of the Indian Con- 
stitution. (Madras ; Raja & Co., 1935.) 

Wolfgang Kraus: Die Stoats- und Vottc&rrechtliche Stdlung 
Britisch-Indiens. (Leipzig : Noske, 1930.) 

Edward Thompson : Reconstructing India. (New York : The 
Dial Press, 1930.) 

G. T. Gairatt : An Indian Commentary. (London : Jonathan 
Caps, 1930.) 

Edwaxd Thomson and G. T. Garratt: Rise and Fulfilment of 
British Buk in India. (New York : Macmiflan, 1934.) 

Subhas 0. Bose : The Indian Struggle. (London : Wishart, 1935.) 

Lester Hutchinson : Conspiracy at Meerut. (London : Allen & 
Unwin, 1935.) 

R. G. Pradham : India's Struggle for Swaraj. (Madras : Natesan, 
1931.) 

David Graham Pole : India in Transition. (London ; Hocarth 
Press, 1932.) 

- Paramananda Dutt: Memoirs of Motilal Ghose. (Calcutta: 
Amrit Bazar Patrika, 1935.) 

P. Chandra Ray : Life and Times of <7. B. Das. (Oxford University 
Press, 1928.) J 

Charles F. Andrews: Mahatma Qandhi's Ideas. (New York : 
Macmfflan, 1930.) 

: Mahatow Gandhi, His Own Story. (New York : 

Macmfflan, 1930,) 

Sylvain L6vi : L'Inde et k Monde. (Paris : Champion, 1926.) 



BIBLIOGRAPHY 317 

Alfred C. Underwood : Contemporary Thought of India. (New 
York : Knopf, 1931.) 

K. R. Luckmidas : Modern India Thinks. (London : Kegan 
Paul, 1932.) 

H. C. E. Zacharias : Renascent India from Earnmahan Boy to 
Mohandas Gandhi. (London : Allen & Unwin, 1933.) 

Kanaiyalal M. Munshi : Gujarat and its Literature. (Bombay : 
Longmans, 1935.) 

M. M. Zuhuruddin Ahmad : Present Day Problems of Indian Educa- 
tion. (Andheri, Bombay : The Ismail College, 1935.) 

M. Siddalingaiya : Reconstructing Ehm&rutary Education in Mysore, 
India. (Mysore : The New Education Fellowship, 1935.) 

Bimanbehari Majumdar: History of Political Thought from 
Eammohun to Dsyananda, 1821-84. Volume L. (Bengal : University 
of Calcutta Press, 1934.) 

R. E. Paranjpye : The Crux of the Indian Problem. (London : 
Watts, 1931.) 

B. T. Ranadive : The Population Problem of India. (New York : 
Longmans, 1930.) 

L. S. S. O'Malley : India's Social Heritage. (Oxford University 
Press, 1934.) 

Frederick B. Fisher : India's Silent Revolution. (New York : 
Macmillan, 1919.) 

Vera Anstey : The Economic Development of India. (New 
York : Longmans, 1931.) 

G. B. Jather and S. G. Beri : Indian Economics. (Oxford Univer- 
sity Press, 1930.) 

Daniel Houston Buchanan : The Development of Capitalistic Enter- 
prise in India. (New York : Macmillan, 1934.) 

S. G. Panandikar : Industrial Labour in India. (Bombay : 
Longmans, 1933.) 

Gladys M. Broughton : Labour in Indian Industries. (Oxford 
University Press, 1924.) 

Ahmad Mukhtar : Trade Umonism and Labour Disputes in India. 
(Bombay: Longmans, 1935.) 

P. Padmanabha PUlai ; Economic Conditions in India. (London : 
Routledge, 1925.) 

B. D. Dasu : Ruin of Indian Trade and Industries. (Calcutta : 
R. Chatterjee, 1935.) 

Chandulal Vakil and M. C. Munghi : Industrial Policy of India. 
(New York : Longmans, 1934.) 

P. S. Lokanathan : Industrial Organization in India. (London : 
Allen & Unwin, 1935.) 

H. R, Soni: Indian Industry and Its Problems. Volume I: Factors 
in Industrial Development. (London : Longmans, 1933.) 



318 BIBLIOGRAPHY 

Margaret Read : The Indian Peasant Uprooted. (New York : 
Longmans, 1931.) 

Gertrude Emerson : Voiceless India. (New York : Doubleday, 
1930.) 

N. Gangulee : The Indian Peasant and His Environment. The 
Linlithgow Commission and After. (Oxford University Press, 1935.) 

Malcolm Lyall Darling : Rustics Loquitur. (Oxford University 
Press, 1930.) 

: Wisdom and Waste in the Punjab Village. (Oxford 

University Press, 1934.) 

B. K. Madan : Some Aspects of Rural Economy in the Punjab. 
(Lahore : Rama Krishna & Sons, 1934.) 

Radhakamal Mukerjee : Land Problems of India. (University of 
Calcutta Press, 1933.) 

Pnem Chand Lai : Reconstruction and Education in Rural India. 
(London : Allen & Unwin, 1932.) 

Hirendra Lai Dey : The Indian Tariff in Relation to Industry and 
Taxation.. (London : Allen & Unwin, 1933.) 

Sir Frederick Whyte : The Future of East and West. (London : 
Sidgwick, 1932.) 

G. E. Hubbard, assisted by Denzil Baring : East&rn Industrialization 
and Its Effect on the West (Oxford University Press, 1935.) 

Edwin R. Embree and others : Island India goes to School. (Chicago 
University Press, 1935.) 

J. T. Petrus Blumberger : De Nativnalistische Beweging in Neder- 
landsche Indie. (Haarlem : Tjeenk Willnik, 1931.) 

Amry Vandenbosch : The Dutch East Indies, its Government, 
Problems and Politics. (Grand Rapids, Michigan : William B. 
Eerdman, 1933.) 

J. B. Alberti : Ulndo-Chine d'autrefois et d'aujourdhui. (Paris : 
Soci<$t6 d'Editions Gteographiques, 1934.) 

Kenneth Saunders : Whither Asia ? (New York : Macmillan, 
1934.) 

Paul Monroe : A Report on Education, in China. (New York : 
The Institute of International Education, 1922.) 

The Re-organization of Education in China. Report of the League 
of Nations' Mission of Educational Experts to China. (League of 
Nations, 1932.) 

Stephen Duggan : A Critique of the Report of the League of Nations' 
Mission of Educational Experts to China. (New York : Institute of 
International Education, 1933.) 

Kyoson Tsuchida : Contemporary Thought of Japan and China. 
(New York : Knopf, 1927.) 

Sophia H. Chen Zen (ed.) : Symposmm on Chinese Culture. 
(Shanghai : China Institute of Pacific Relations, 1931.) 



BIBLIOGRAPHY 319 

Nathaniel Peffer : China : The Collapse of a Civilization. (New 
York : John Day, 1930.) 

Lin Yutang : My Country and My People. (New York : John 
Day, 1935.) 

Lyon Sharman : Sun Yat-sen, His Life and Its Meaning. A Critical 
Biography. (New York : John Day, 1934.) 

Sun Yat-sen : San min chu i, the Three Principles of the People. 
(Shanghai : China Institute of Pacific Relations, 1927.) 

Tang Leang-li : China in Revolt ; How a Civilization became a 
Nation. (London : Douglas, 1927.) 

: The Inner History of the Chinese Revolution. (New York : 

Dutton, 1930.) 

Arthur Norman Holcombe : The Chinese Revolution ; A Phase in 
the Regeneration of a World Power. (Harvard University Press, 1930.) 

Hu Shih : The Chinese Renaissance. (University of Chicago Press, 
1934.) 

Paul Monroe : China. A Nation in Evolution. (New York : 
MacmiUan, 1928.) 

Wang Tsi Chang : The Youth Movement in China. (New York : 
The New Republic, 1927.) 

Hu Shih and Ian Yutang : China's Own Critics. (Peking : China 
United Press, 1931.) 

Lo Ren Yen : China's Revolution from the Inside. (New York : 
Abingdon, 1930.) 

Lee Teng Hwee : Vital Factors in China's Problems. (New York : 
Stechert, 1927.) 

Cyras H. Peake : Nationalism and Education in Modem China. 
(New York : Columbia University Press, 1932.) 

James B. Webster: Christian Education and the National Con- 
sciousness in China. (New York : Dutton, 1923.) 

Walter H. Mallory : China, Land of Famine. (New York : 
American Geographical Society, 1927.) 

Richard Wilhelm: Chinesische Wirtschaftspsychologie. (Leipzig: 
Deutsche Wissenschaftliche Buchhandlung, 1930.) 

Harold M. Vinacke : Problems of Industrial Development in China. 
(Princeton University Press, 1926.) 

Richard H. Tawney : Land and Labour in China. (New York : 
Harcourt, 1932.) 

Carl August Wittfogel: Wirts(faftund(faellsc^ Versuch 

d&r loissenscJiaftlichen Analyse emer grosser Asiatischen Agrargesdl- 
schaft. Bd. 1 : Produktivkrdfte, Productions- und Zirkulationsprozess. 
(Leipzig: BKrschfeld, 1931.) 

Victor A. Yakhontoff : The Chinese Soviets. (New York: Coward, 
McCann, 1934.) 

Fundamental Laws of ihe Chinese Soviet Republic. (New York : 
International Publisher, 1934.) 



320 BIBLIOGRAPHY 

Violet Conolly: Soviet Economic Policy in {he East. (Oxford 
University Press, 1933.) 

: Soviet Trade from the Pacific to the Levant, with an 

Economic Study of the Soviet Far Eastern Region. (Oxford University 
Press, 1935.) 

Ernst Schultze : Japan als Wdtindustriemacht 2 Bde. (Stuttgart : 
Kohlhammer, 1935.) 

Emil Lederer und Emy Lederer-Seidler : Japan-Europa. Wand- 
lungen im Femen Oaten. (Frankfurt a.M. : Societats Verlag, 1929.) 

Comao Murakami : Dos Japanische Erziehungswesen. (Tokyo : 
Fuzambo, 1934.) 

0. Tanm and E. Yohan : Militarism and Fascism in Japan. (New 
York : International Publishers, 1934.) 

Malcolm D. Kennedy : The Changing Fabric of Japan. (London : 
Constable, 1930.) 

Inazo Ota Nitobe and others : Western Influences in Modern Japan. 
(Chicago University Press, 1931.) 

Harry Emerson Wildes : Social Currents in Japan. (Chicago 
University Press, 1927.) 

: Japan in Crisis. (New York : Macmillan, 1934.) 

Bertram Johannes Otto Schrieke : The Effect of Western Influence 
on Native Civilizations in the Malay Archipelago. (Batavia : Kolff, 
1929.) 



INDEX 



Abadan (port on Persian Gulf), 172, 

173, 176, 183 
Abbasids (dynasty of Arab khalif s), 30, 

49, 56, 63 

Abdullah (Emir of Transjordania), 205 
Abdul Aziz ibn Abdur Bahman (leader 

of the Wahhabites) (see Ibn 

Saud) 
Abdul Hamid (Sultan of Turkey), 67, 

127, 130, 234, 235, 264, 273 
Abu Bekr (Arab Khalif), 34. 
Abyssinia, 167, 228 
Abyssinian church, 39 
Acre, 59, 61, 62, 127, 129, 130, 182, 200 
Adalia (in Asia Minor), 199 
Aden, 123, 143, 194, 195 
Adrianople, 63 
Adriatic, 58, 198 
Aegean, 2, 12, 193 
Afghanistan, 141, 144, 186, 193, 197, 

209, 212, 224, 225, 226, 243, 244, 

260 

Africa, 4, 11, 122 
Aga Khan (Mohammedan religious 

leader), 53 

Agricultural Bank of Egypt, 293 
Agriculture, 18, 75, 76, 108, 161f., 239, 

272, 275, 298 (see also Cattle, 

Credit system, Drought, Manure, 

Bain, Taxation) 
Agriculture, capital provision, 76, 77, 

239, 301 
Agriculture, reforms, 76, 77, 162, 239. 

272, 301 

Ahwaz (Persian town), 172 
Aircraft, 118 
Air lines : British, 140, 141, 142, 143, 

145, 195, 256 
Dutch, 143, 145 
Egyptian, 145, 294, 297 
French, 143, 144, 145 
German, 141, 143, 144, 258 
Iraqi, 142, 145 
Soviet Russian, 141, 143, 144 
Turkish, 144 

Air traffic, 140-6, 256, 258 
Akaba (Bed Sea port), 58, 121, 130, 

131, 143, 174, 194, 222 
Alauites (Syrian sect), 54, 59 
Albania, 198 
Aleppo, 58, 127, 128, 129, 131, 134, 135, 

136, 144, 145, 222, 264, 268 
Alexander the Great, 4, 25, 26, 27, 28, 

31 

Alexandretta, 54, 59, 127, 134, 264 
Alexandria, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 33, 38, 

133, 226, 238, 295 
Algiers, 63 



AH (Arab Khalif), 51 

Allenby, Viscount, 61 

Amanullah, King of Afghanistan, 244 

Amman (capital of Transjordania), 131 

Anatolia, 13, 105, 111, 116, 128, 144, 

145, 171, 176, 198, 221, 236, 238, 

250 
Anatolians, 6, 111 (see also Turks, 

Committee of Unity and Progress) 
Anglicanism (see Christianity) 
Anglo-Egyptian Oilfields Co., 171 
Anglo-Iranian (Anglo-Persian) Oil Co., 

169, 171f., 173, 174-6, 177, 178, 

256 
Ankara (Angora), 99, 101, 106, 111, 

144, 211, 225 
Antioch, 29, 30, 59, 127, 134 (see also 

Patriarchs) 
Arabia, 14, 17, 18, 73, 81, 85, 127, 133, 

138, 143, 167, 173, 199, 205, 219, 
220, 223, 226, 246, 264, 283-6 

straggle for, 127, 129, 195 
Arabic language, 10, 35, 36, 48, 101, 

265, 266, 273 
Arabs, 6, 10, 34, 45, 46, 47, 48, 73, 195, 

197, 199, 200, 207, 214, 288 
struggle for unity, 221f., 223, 224 
Aryans and Turanians, 112 
Armenia, 13, 200, 203, 207, 218, 219 
Armenians, 61, 75, 199, 214-19, 237, 

265 

Armenian Church, 39, 43, 215 
Army and military duty, 250, 282 
Artistic sense in the East, 77, 79, 80 
Asia, 3, 4, 39, 196, 197, 213, 249, 264 
Asia Minor, 10, 24, 63, 111, 116, 179, 

193, 196, 198, 200, 201, 209, 212, 

213, 221, 224, 237 
Asir (in Arabia), 63, 198 
Assuan, 302 
Assyria, 14, 56 
Assyrians, 39, 43 
Atlantic, 11, 117 
Augustus (Roman Emperor), 32 
Australia, 124, 125 
Austria-Hungary, 64, 126, 192, 198 
Autocracy, its results, 64, 79, 85, 187, 

228, 233, 261 
Azerbaijan (in Caucasus), 186, 225 

Baba Gurgur (oil wells), 181 
Bab el Mandeb (straits of), 123 
Babylon, 14, 24, 30, 31, 138, 167 
Baghdad, 30, 31, 56, 63, 80, 101, 118, 
127, 129, 131, 133, 134, 136, 138, 

139, 140, 142, 143, 144, 145, 180, 
197, 200, 223, 224, 226, 261, 275, 
279, 280, 282 



$21 



322 



INDEX 



Baghdad Railway, 7, 118, 126-9, 132, 

135, 194, 196 
Bahrein Islands (in Persian Gulf), 1S6, 

194 

Baku, 7, 144, 177, 195, 197, 208 
Balfour, Lord, 205 

declaration, 200, 204 
Balkan wars, 5, 221, 236 
Balkan countries, 6, 63, 192, 229, 245 
Baluchistan, 134, 186, 225 
Bandar Abbas (in Iran), 142 
Bandar Shapur (Iranian port), 172 
Bari (Arab Sultanate in Italy), 48 
Basra, 7, 10, 34, 62, 128, 129, 131, 134, 

139, 142, 143, 172, 173, 183, 195, 

280 

Beaconsfield, Earl of, 120, 135, 172 
Bedouins, 20, 26, 45, 73f., 183, 277, 

283-6 

Beersheba, 264 
Beirut (Syrian port), 107, 130, 136, 139, 

145, 257, 261, 262, 264, 267, 268, 

282 

Belgrade, 10, 118 
Benedict XV (Pope), 44 
Berlin, 118, 129, 143, 144, 197 

congress of, 214 
Black Sea, 3, 12, 18, 63, 192, 193, 197, 

209, 213 

Bombay, 118, 124, 139 
Bosphorus, 7, 64, 192, 197, 199, 221, 

242 

Brazil, 152 
Briand, Aristide, 205 
British Empire, 5, 8, 133, 135, 145, 148, 

168, 173, 186 (see also Anglicanism, 

Great Britain, Suez Canal, route to 

India) 

British Oil Development Co., 183 
British policy, 130f. s 141, 177, 183, 205, 

206 
British railway policy, 129, 132-7, 143, 

174, 200 

Brussa (in Asia Minor), 63 
Budapest, 63 
Burma Oil Co., 172 
Bushire (Iranian port), 142, 144, 195 
Business, Oriental attitude to, 71, 269, 

289, 292 

Byzantine Empire, 31-37, 192 
Byzantium, 2, 10, 31f., 33, 36, 40, 63, 

118 (see also Constantinople) 

Cabul (capital of Afghanistan), 141, 144 

Cadiz, 185 

Cadman, Sir John, 178 

Cairo, 34, 101, 103, 134, 135, 140, 142, 

143, 144, 145, 295 
Calendar reform, 241 
Camel, 20, 137, 238, 285 
Calcutta, 135 

Canterbury, Archbishop of, 38, 43 
Canton, 62 

Cape of Good Hope, 62, 140, 143 
Cape Town, 135 



Capital, formation of, 86, 158, 159, 162 

lack of, 77, 79, 108, 161, 228, 268 
Capitulations, 59, 107, 159, 186, 189 

190, 191, 210, 211, 252, 256, 288,' 

290,300 

Carlowitz, Treaty of, 64 
Carthage, 24, 27 
Caspian, 12, 18, 195, 257 
Castellorizo (off coast of Anatolia), 198 
Cattle, 20, 21, 73, 74 
Caucasus, 7, 186, 193, 195, 197, 213, 221 
Central Asia, 4, 186 
Ceylon, 39, 124 

Chalcedon, oecumenical council of, 39 
Chaldeans, 39 

Chamberlain, Sir Austen, 216 
Charlemagne, 32, 55 
Chester, Colby M. (American admiral). 

171, 175, 176 

China, 4, 39, 62, 150, 152, 187, 303 
Chivalry, 60f. 

Christianity, 10, 32, 33, 46, 47, 48 
Anglican, 8, 38, 43, 44 
divisions, 39, 40, 41, 43 
Eastern, 8, 29, 33, 35, 36, 37-45, 229 
Church (see Christianity, State and 

Religion) 

of the Holy Sepulchre, 55, 65 
Churchill, Winston, 172, 204 
Cilicia, 13, 127, 157, 204, 215 
Citizenship, 25, 79, 228, 261 
Citrus fruits, 18 
Climate, 14-18, 69f. 
Clothing industry, 79, 147 
Coal, 168 
Coffee, 18 
Colonial countries, 7, 91, 150, 152, 161, 

189, 213, 227, 302 
Committee of Unity and Progress, 67, 

221, 235, 236 
Communications, significance of, 115f. 

(see also Trade routes) 
Compagnie Fran$aise des P^troles, 179, 

181 

Concessions, hunt for, 66, 177, 178, 187 
Congress of Berlin, 214 
of Paris, 65, 225 
of Vienna, 66 
Conrad (German king), 60 
Constantino I (Emperor), 31 
Constantino VI (Emperor), 32 
Constantino XI (Emperor), 32 
Constantinople, 7, 31ff., 62f., 68, 129, 

135, 171, 192, 193, 195, 199, 207, 

264 (see also Byzantium, Istanbul) 
siege by Arabs, 34 
plundered by Crusaders, 40f , 
conquered by Turks, 63 
occupied after the Great War, 68 
Constitutions in the Near East, 97f., 

100 
Co-operative societies, 161, 162, 239, 

301 

Copts, 39, 47, 214, 288 
Corruption, 64, 187, 190, 247 
Corsica, 11 



INDEX 



323 



Cotton, 18, 147-58, 193, 231, 270, 291f., 
300, 301 

goods, 231, 238 
Cox, Sir Percy, 250 
Crane, Charles (American), 219 
Credit system, 77, 160, 161 
Crete, 3 
Crimea, 10 
Crimean War, 5, 65 
Crusades, 4, 10, 11, 40, 55-62, 147, 197 
Currency problems, 164-7 

reform, 269 

Curzon, Earl of, 194, 216, 248 
Cyprus, 3, 61, 193 
Cyrus, 32 

Damascus, 49, 58, 78, 101, 130, 131, 

132, 138, 139, 143, 145, 177, 205, 

261, 264, 266, 268, 270 
D'Aroy, William Knox, 171, 175 
Darius, 32, 119 
Date palms, 18, 73 
Dead Sea, 58 

Deir-ez-Zor (in Syria), 131, 136 
Democracy, 233, 249 
Deraa, 130 

Dervish monasteries, 99 
Desert, 14, 59, 74-84, 137, 138, 139, 

141, 183, 222, 223, 260, 277, 278, 

283, 284, 285, 287 

Despotism, 233 (see also Autocracy) 
Deterding, Sir Henri, 169 
Diarbekir, 144 
Dictatorship, 233 
Dizful (in Iran), 172 
Dodecanese, 198 
Drought, 16 
Druses (sect in Syria), 74, 263 

East Africa, 143, 156, 195 

cotton in, 156 

Eastern Empire (see Byzantine Empire) 

Eastern Question, 5, 65f., 187, 193, 

235, 245 (see also War, Ottoman 

Empire, Turkey) 

East and West, in ancient times, 24-6, 

39 
relation of, 24, 33, 41, 47f., 54f., 56, 

68, 107f., 110, 163, 207, 213f. 
unity of, 5, 47f., 107 
Economic transformations, 153-64 
Edessa, 59 

Education, 84, 85, lOOf., 106f., 239, 
255, 259, 260, 262, 264-7, 281, 286, 
296, 300 

Edward VII, 186 

Egypt, 11, 12, 14, 15, 18, 28, 24, 28, 30, 
34, 39, 46, 47, 60, 84, 103f., 108, 
109, 132, 133, 136, 137, 143, 145, 
159, 160, 185, 193, 204, 205, 227, 
246, 264, 268, 273, 274, 275, 286- 
305 

and the Soudan, 156 
cotton in, 149, 150, 153, 154, 155, 

156, 157, 158, 29H., 300, 301 
currency policy, 164f. 



Egypt, education in, 103f., 289, 296 
finances of, 187 
modernization of industry, 155, 160, 

290-6 (see also Misr) 
national debt, 188, 298f. 
Egyptians, 6, 23, 38, 197, 228 
Electrification, 231, 271, 281, 302 
filite, formation or lack of, 6, 162, 267, 

303 
Encyclopaedists, 4 (see also 

" Enlightenment ") 
England, 11, 147f., 168, 206 (see also 

Great Britain) 
" Enlightenment,** the, 87, 102, 185, 

233, 267, 303 
Enver Pasha, 235 
Ergani, copper mines, 231, 238 
Eritrea, 198 
Ertoghrul (ancestor of Osman dynasty), 

63 

Eskishehir, 144 
Euphrates, 14, 131, 136, 172, 182, 273, 

274, 275 
Europe, as a historical and spiritual 

entity, 3, 24, 54, 62, 87, 185, 

206, 227f., 229, 246 (see also 

" Enlightenment ", Technical 

progress) 
Europeanization, 4f., llf., 87, 89ff., 98, 

113, 206, 209, 227, 228, 240, 245f., 

254, 261, 277, 285, 290, 302f. (see 

also " Enlightenment ", Industry, 

Religion, Secularization, Technical 

progress, Women) 
of education, 103f., 262 (see also 

Education) 

Faisal (King of Iraq), 178, 181, 205, 

222, 223, 277f . 
Famagusta (in Cyprus), 61 
Fao, 172, 173 
Farmers, 21, 239 (see also Agriculture, 



Fatalism, 50f ., 72, 86 
Fatimids (dynasty of Khalifs), 56 
Fellaheen (see Peasants) 
Fergana (in Turkestan), 149 
Fertilizers (see Manure) 
Fig tree, 18 

Finances, disorganization through 
loans, 116, 187f. 

and political control, 116, 18Sf. 
Five Feddan Law, 289 
Flora of Mediterranean, 18, 19 
France, 7, 58, 134, 136, 145, 149, 177, 
178, 179, 186, 196, 197, 198, 199, 
200, 201, 202, 204, 217 

in Syria, 68, 197, 220, 262 
Franks, 55, 58, 61 
Frederick II (Emperor), 48, 61 
French language, 11, 101, 197, 266 
Fuad, King, 121 
Fustat(m Egypt), 34 

Gaul, 3 

Gaza (in Palestine), 46, 142 



324 



INDEX 



Genghis Khan, 62 

Genoa, 12, 57, 59, 124 

Georgia, 186, 195 

Gerga (in Egypt), 103 

Germany, 7, 118, 125, 126, 134, 141, 
149, 176, 185, 196, 197, 198, 223, 
232 (see also Baghdad Railway) 

Ghazi, King, 224 

Gibraltar, 10 

Gnosis, 28 

Goats, 17, 21 

Godfrey of Bouillon (leader of Crusade), 

Grain, 16, 18, 74 
Grapes, 18 

Great Britain, 7, 64, 129, 132, 136, 141, 
151, 153, 154, 168, 171, 177, 178, 
186, 193, 194, 195, 197, 198, 199, 
200, 201, 202, 204, 205, 207, 208, 
210, 211, 216, 219, 248, 249, 250, 
256, 263, 277, 279 (see also British 
Empire, England) 

Great National Assembly (Turkey), 
107,233,234 * h 

Greece, 2, 192, 237 
Greek citizens andl freedom, 25, 26 
Church, nationalism of, 42 
dispersion (" diaspora "), 28 
efforts for unity, 192, 237 
language, 35f. 
wars of liberation, 29, 33 
Greeks, 24ff., 28f., 61, 75, 83, 96, 107, 

179, 198, 236f. 
called Rumi, 33 
Gregory XIII (Pope), 40 

Hadramaut (on South Arabian coast) 
123, 143 

Hagia Sophia, 62, 102 

Haifa (port in Palestine), 7, 61, 129, 
130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 
143, 173, 174, 178, 182, 183, 200, 

Haifa-Baghdad Railway, 132-7 
Hama, 58 
Hamadan 144 
Hanbalites (Islamic sect), 51 
Harbord, James (American), 219 
Haroun al Rashid, 30, 55 
Hasa (on Persian Gulf), 138, 195 
Hasan-ibn-Ali (grandson of the 

Prophet), 52 
Hauran (in Syria), 130 
Health service, 85, 289, 300 
Hedjaz, 131, 167, 195, 222, 223, 227, 

277 

railway, 116, 129-32 
Hellas (see Greece) 
HeUenism, 4, 8, 9, 23, 26, 34, 35, 36, 

48,62,68,229 
Heraclius (Emperor), 46 
Herat (in Afghanistan), 144, 197, 225 
Hindus, 193 
Historical stage as determining factor, 

Hitler regime, 241 



Hittites, 111 

Holland, 125, 126 

Holy Places (see Palestine) 

Home industries, 271 

Horns (Syrian town), 58, 136 

Hospitality, 73 

Humanism, Eastern, 4, 5 

Humanitas, 27 

Hungary, 62 

Hurghada (Egyptian oilfield), 171 

Husain ibn Ali (grandson of the 

Prophet), 52 
(king of the Hedjaz), 195, 205, 222, 

223 

Ibn Saud, 74, 136, 137, 138, 174, 195, 

224, 246, 252, 277, 284, 286 
Ibrahim ibn Adham, 50 
Idrisides, 53 
Illiteracy, fight against, 103f., 106f 

264-7 
Imam, 52 
Mahdi, 52 

Yehya of Yemen, 224 
Imperial Airways (see Air Lines 

British) 

Imperial Bank of Persia (see Persia) 
Imperialism, 6, 87, 117, 135, 151, 177f., 

185, 199, 206, 208, 212 
and reaction, 87, 249, 288 
Independence, struggle for, 83, 110, 

189, 261 
value of, 90, 160, 163, 227f. (see also 

Nationalism) 
India, 4, 124, 125, 129, 133, 140, 143, 

144, 149, 150, 153, 194, 195, 196, 

route to, 7, 30, 127, 133, 135, 179, 
185, 186, 193, 196 (see also Rail- 
ways, Air lines, Suez Canal) 

Indian Ocean, 117, 135, 138, 193, 194, 
257 

Indo-China, 124 

Indo-European Telegraph Co., 256 

Industrial centres, development, 30, 
154 

Industrialization, 152, 160, 161, 184, 
209, 230f., 279 

Industry, 79f., 160 
modernization of, lOSff., 158-64 
268-72 

Intellectuals, 66, 88, 96, 197, 221, 232, 
289 

Iran, 96, 97, 109, 129, 134, 136, 137, 
138, 143, 144, 151, 157, 160, 171, 
174, 175, 178, 183, 209, 212, 228, 
229, 246, 269, 280, 282, 290 (see 
also Persia) 

Iranian banks, 258 

Iraq, 12, 104, 109, 129, 133, 136, 142, 
157, 160, 171, 173, 176, 178, 179, 
180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 193, 195 
205, 212, 220, 223, 224, 226, 228, 
254, 257, 260, 261, 273-83, 285, 
(see also Mesopotamia) 

Iraq Petroleum Co., 180-3 



INDEX 



325 



Irene (Empress), 32 

Irrigation, 81, 272, 274f., 287, 289, 295, 

300, 302 

Isch Bankassi (Turkish Bank), 226 
Ispahan (Persian town), 144 
Islam, 4, 8, 35, 45-55, 62, 66, 98, 229, 
235, 261, 293 

and Arabia, 45, 49, 55, 102 

and Persia, 53, 102, 253 

and Turkey, 92, 98f., lOlf. 

democracy in Islam, 46, 99 

equality in Islam, 46 

Khalifate, 48f., 52, 98 

law of, 99, 253f., 293 

Mohammedan world congress, 131 

religious conception of, 50 

sects in, 5 Iff. 

State constitution in, 51, 67, 93, 253 

toleration in, 46, 49, 53, 55 
Ismail (Viceroy of Egypt), 121 
Ismailia (town on Suez Canal), 121 
Ismailites (Mohammedan sect), 53 
Istanbul, 62, 68, 144, 237, 241 (see also 

Constantinople) 

Italy, 7, 11, 27, 85, 126, 149, 157, 185, 
196, 198, 200, 201, 223, 232 

coastal towns, 3, 27, 57, 124 
Italian language, 11 

Jacobite Church (in Syria), 39 

Jaffa, 264 

Japan, 149, 152, 158 

Jerusalem, 16, 46, 58, 60, 61, 131, 264 

(see also Palestine, Crusades, 

Patriarchs) 
Jesuits, 262, 267 
Jews, 24, 25, 58, 69, 88, 93, 199, 200, 

201, 204, 229 

Jidda (port in Hedjaz), 130, 136 
John VIII (Pope), 48 
Judaea, 58 

Kajars (Persian dynasty), 66, 251 

Kalbites (Arab dynasty), 48 

Kantara (on Suez Canal), 121, 134 

Karachi, 142, 194 

Kasr-i-Shiran (in Persia), 143 

Kemal (see Mustapha Kemal) 

Kerak, 58 

Kerbela (in Iraq), 52, 275 

Kermanshah, 144 

Khaled (Arab general), 34 

Khalif, 34, 39, 47, 49, 51, 52, 67, 97, 

222, 232, 234, 235, 280 (see also 

Abbasids, Abdul Haxnid, Islam, 

Omayyads) 

Khan Abu Shemat (in Syria), 138 
Khanaqin (in Iraq), 175 
Khartoum, 156 
King, Henry (American), 219 
Kirkuk (in Iraq), 128, 129, 167, 181, 

182 

Kismet (see Fatalism) 
Kitchener, Lord, 132, 289 
Knightliness, 56 
Arabian, 60f . 



Konia (in Anatolia), 63, 144 
Korea, 152 
Kuds al Sherif , 60 
Kufa (in Mesopotamia), 34 
Kurdistan, 127, 129, 200, 201, 204, 238 
Kurds, 6, 73, 74, 199, 237, 278 
Kuria Muria Islands, 123 
Kutchuk Kainardji, Treaty of, 64 
Kuweit (on Persian Gulf), 128, 143, 
174, 194 

Labour, 18, 72, 184, 240, 279, 296 

legislation, 161, 240, 279, 280, 297 
Lambeth Conferences, 38 
Lancashire, 148, 149, 150 
Languages and their influence, 35, 101 
Latin alphabet, introduction of, 106, 

240, 252, 255 
America (South America), 5, 83, 187, 

248 

language, 35 
Latakia (in Syria), 59 
Lausanne, Treaty of, 190, 204, 218, 

242 

Lawrence, T. E., 132, 201, 222 
Leaders, personality of, 232, 234, 244, 

251 

Lebanon, 130, 263, 264, 266 
Lesseps, Ferdinand de, 119 
Leasing, 60 
Levant, 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 13, 24, 26, 35, 

56, 57, 58, 59, 62, 71, 74, 75, 85, 

88, 96, 97, 103, 108, 117, 118, 137, 

138, 139, 145, 147, 162, 170, 177, 

184, 186, 197, 198, 199, 200, 205, 

213, 214, 263, 264, 269 
Sea, 2, 12, 24 
Levantines, 29, 71, 72, 78, 79, 265 (see 

also Franks) 
Liverpool, 148 

Lloyd George, David, 201, 206, 217 
Loans, imperialist, 66, 116, 133, 187, 

189, 250, 280 
London, 124, 125, 129, 140, 143, 145 

Treaty of, 199 

Louis VII (king of France), 60 
Lutfi Bey, Omar (Egyptian), 301 
Luxuries, 1581, 239, 267, 291 

Maan (in Transjordania), 130, 131 
MacMahon, General, 195 
Mahmudia Canal, 28 
Maize, 18 
Malaria, 85 
Malay Peninsula, 124 
Malta, 10 

Man, Near-Eastern, 69-86, 267, 293 
Near-Eastern, change in, 90f., 114, 

162, 239, 245, 257, 268f. 
pre-capitalistic, 71, 72, 293 
social forms, 71, 90 
time spirit of, 71, 72 
Mandates in the Levant, 60, 77, 90, 
105, 131, 133, 163, 170, 171, 177, 
191, 196, 204, 218, 219, 220, 262, 
277, 285 



326 



INDEX 



Manure, 21, 161, 231, 272, 302 
Maria-Theresa dollar, 167 
Maronites, 39, 40, 59, 262, 263 
Marseilles, 12, 124, 125, 145 
Mecca (in Arabia), 130, 138, 199, 200, 

222, 223 

Medina, 130, 131 

Mediterranean, unity of, 3, 5, 8-11, 69 
Mehemet Ali, 11, 28, 126, 155, 185, 288 
Meshed, 144 
Mesopotamia, 3, 80, 81, 132, 134, 136, 

171, 173, 197, 200, 201, 202, 219, 

221, 222, 264, 273, 274 (see also 

Iraq) 

Middle Ages, 55, 62, 233 
Middle Eastern Empire, 7, 195f . 
Miletus (in Ionia), 24 
Mind and power, 1, 24f. 
Minorities, favour to, 59, 215, 263 
protection of, 203, 204, 215, 278 
religious, in Near East, 198, 215, 235, 

261 

Minority policy, 214-19, 237, 278 
Misr (National Egyptian bank), 160, 

226, 270, 293, 294, 295, 297 
Mission of a people or a civilization, 6, 

206 

Missions, Christian, 106, 198, 262, 264-7 
Modernization and Europeanization, 

88ff., 98f., 107f., 227-303 
of law, 100, 280 

Mohammed (the Prophet), 45, 102 
ibn Abd-al-Wahhab, 51 
Said (Viceroy of Egypt), 119 
Mohammerah (in Iran), 172, 195 
Mongols, 63 

Monoculture, 150, 154f., 291 
Monophysites, 39 
Monothelites, 39 
Monroe, Paul (American), 281 
Moscow, 36, 143, 144, 185, 212 
Mosul, 128, 129, 134, 135, 136, 145, 173, 

176, 177, 179, 180, 181, 183, 

211, 226, 282 
Motor cars, 118, 137-40, 183, 238, 258, 

259, 282, 284, 285 
Mulberry tree, 18 
Murad I (Sultan of Turkey), 63 
Muscat (on Persian Gulf), 194, 195 
Mustapha Kemal (Mustapha Ataturk), 
99, 106, 113, 203, 205, 208, 221, 
232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237, 241, 
243, 244, 246, 246, 250, 286 

Napoleon I and the Mediterranean, 7, 
11, 119, 126, 129, 185, 186, 247, 
288 

Nathan der W&ise, 60 
Nation and cultural origins, 11 If. 
and language, lOOf., 240, 262 
and religion, 39ff., 60, 93, 102 
National Bank of Egypt, 164, 293 
National character, 1, 69 
Nationalism, 2, 5, 6, 60, 67, 86, 92, 112, 

152, 163, 198, 203, 205, 232, 304 
and cultural work, 107, 112f. 



Nationalism and industry, 108-12, 152 

154, 158-64 
Navigation in ancient times, 27 

in modern times (see Suez Canal) 
Nejd, 145, 195, 223 
Nestorians (Christian sect), 39 
New Zealand, 124 
Nile, 2, 121, 156, 273, 287 
Nissibin (in Turkey), 128, 129, 131 
Nomads (see Bedouins) 
Nubar, Boghos Pasha (Armenian), 216 
Nussayrians (see Alauites) 

Oasis economic life, 78f., 81 

Odessa, 29 

Oecumene (see World State) 

Officials, 187, 206, 252, 262 

Oil, 141, 167-84, 193, 201, 256, 278, 280 

Olive tree, 18 

Omayyads (dynasty of Khalifs), 49 

Oman (in Arabia), 14, 143, 194, 195 

Open door, principle of the, 179 

Orient and Occident, 3, 7 (see also East 

and West) 

Orient Express, 129, 135 
Osman (founder of the Osmanic 

dynasty), 63, 234 
Osmaos, 63 (see also Turks) 
Ottoman Bank, 165, 188 

National Debt regime, 188 
Ottoman empire, 10, 62-8, 116, 129, 
130, 159, 170, 187, 193, 197, 198, 
199, 221, 229, 234, 235, 248, 260, 
262, 264, 273, 303 
as heir of Byzantium, 37, 63 
reforms in, 65, 92f . 

Palestine, 12, 15, 46, 55, 59, 60, 94, 105, 
132, 133, 135, 139, 151, 160, 179, 
201, 204, 219, 221, 224, 263, 294, 
297 
Holy Places, 55, 61, 65 

Palmyra (oasis in Syrian desert), 136, 
286 

Pan-Hellenism, 193, 237 

Pan-Islamism, 67, 130, 235 

Pan-Turanianism, 112, 208, 221, 235 

Paris Congress, 65, 225 

Parties, 82f., 97, 163 (see also Republi- 
can People's Party, Wafd) 

Patriarch of Antioch, 38, 42 
Constantinople, 33, 38, 42 
Jerusalem, 38, 42 

Patriarchate of Eastern Church, 29, 37, 
40 

Paul, 24 

Peasants, 73, 75, 76, 77, 239, 272, 276f,, 
286, 288, 292, 298, 300, 301 

Perim (in Bed Sea), 123 

Persia (Iran), 12, 31, 47, 65, 85, 107, 
115, 116, 134, 142, 143, 146, 157, 
159, 166, 167, 171, 172f,, 174, 175, 
177, 178, 186, 187, 193, 194, 195, 
196, 197, 199, 200, 204, 205, 207, 
209, 210, 211, 217, 224, 225, 246-60 



INDEX 



327 



Persia (Iran), Imperial Bank of, 165, 

166, 255 

Iranian National Bank, 259 
and Great Britain, 143, 173, 174, 

175, 177, 195, 204, 207, 208, 248, 

249, 250, 255, 256 
and Russia, 66, 195, 196, 207, 208, 

209, 211, 212, 248, 249, 250, 256, 

257 
Persian industrial emancipation, 166, 

257ff. 

nationalism, 250f., 260 
railways, 172, 257 
revolution, 66, 251 
Persian Gulf, 12, 63, 124, 127, 129, 132, 

134, 135, 138, 143, 144, 171, 172, 
173, 183, 193, 194, 195, 223, 257 

language, 101 

Persians (Iranians), 6, 197, 207, 247 
Peter the Great, 192 
Petroleum (see Oil) 
Philistines, 58 
Phtto, 24 
Phoenicia, 24 
Phoenicians, 3, 9, 24, 58 
Picot, Georges (French), 199, 222 
Pipe-line, 133, 139, 172, 173, 174, 176, 

178, 181, 182, 183 
Pius XI (Pope), 44 
Political interests and life, 81f., 163, 

289 

Ponente, 3 
Pope, 32, 40, 57 
Population, 84f., 298 
Port Fuad (on Sues Canal), 121 
Port Said (on Suez Canal), 121, 132 
Port Soudan (in Soudan), 156 
Press, 81f. 

Qatar (in Arabia), 194 

Railway concessions, 116 
Railways, 116, 187, 237, 238, 284 
Baghdad Railway, 7, 118, 126-9, 132, 

135, 194, 196 

Haifa-Baghdad Railway, 132-7 
Hedjaz Railway, 116, 129-32 
Iranian railway, 257 
Turkish railways, 238 

(see also British railway policy) 
Rain, 16 
Rationalism, 66 
Red Sea, 12, 58, 73, 119, 122, 123, 130, 

135, 138, 171, 194, 195, 198, 22$ 
Religion as a social, etc., factor, 36, 54, 

93, 98 (see also Encyclopaedists, 

Christianity, Islam, Middle Ages) 
Renaissance, 4, 94, 303 
Republican People's Party, 97, 111, 

112, 113, 233, 234 
Reaht (in Persia), 144 
Revolution, influence of French, 185, 

303 

influence of Russian, 242, 250 
Riza 8hah (Shah of Persia), 138, 204, 

244, 246, 251, 252, 253, 254, 256 



Rhodes, 198 

Riyadh (capital of Nejd), 138 
Rivalry of Powers in Near East, 67f., 
118 

Anglo-American (see Oil) 

Anglo-French, 120, 134, 179, 186f., 

Anglo-German (see Baghdad Rail- 
way) 
Anglo-Russian, 141, 186, 194, 195, 

196, 207, 208, 213, 248-50 
Franco-Italian, 245 
Franco-Russian, 65 
(see also Trade Routes) 
Rockefeller, John D., 169 
Roman empire, 3, 9, 31, 32, 33, 34 
Rome, 9, 27, 33, 36 
Routes (see Trade Routes) 
Royal Dutch Shell Trust, 169, 177 
Rumi or Rhomaioi, 33 
Russia, 5, 7, 64, 149, 186, 192, 193, 196, 
198, 199, 200, 201, 217, 247, 248, 
249 (see also Soviet Union) 
Russia as successor of Byzantium, 36, 

192f. 
as protector of Christian minorities, 

64 
Russia's policy in regard to Turkey and 

Constantinople, 36, 64, 192f. 
Rutbah (in Syrian desert), 139, 142 

Saad Zaghlul (see Zaghlul) 

Sabaeans (sect in Mesopotamia), 80 

Safawids (Persian dynasty), 32 

Saigon, 145 

Saladin, 60 

Samarra, 129 

Samuel, Sir Herbert, 204 

San Remo (see Treaties) 

Sarmatia, 3 

Sassanids (Persian dynasty), 32 

Saudi Arabia, 283-6 

Sayyid (descendant of Prophet), 52 

Secret Treaties in the Great War, 177, 

199f., 207, 222 
Secularization, 94, 98f., 103, 233, 234, 

254 (see also Encyclopaedists, 

Religion) 
Seleucia, 30, 138 
Seljuks, 56, 63 
Semi-colonial countries (see Colonial 

countries) 
Serbia, 198 
Sevres (see Treaties) 
Shatt-el-Arab (in Mesopotamia), 128, 

173, 195 

Sheep breeding, 21 
Shell Oil Co. (see Royal Dutch) 
Sherif (descendant of Prophet), 52 
Shiites (Mohammedan sect), 513., 102, 

253 

Shuster, Morgan, 66 
Sicily, 10, 48 
Silver, 164-7 

Sinai Peninsula, 121, 130, 132, 194 
Smyrna, 200 



328 



INDEX 



Society in the Near East, 69f., 90f., 
113,245,254f.,291 

Socotra Islands, 123 

Socrates, 25 

Soudan, 153, 156, 157 

South America (see Latin America) 

Southern Arabia, 14, 17, 73 

Southern Italy, 232 

Soviet Union, 5, 134, 150, 158, 159, 169, 
177, 189, 199, 207-13, 225, 230, 
241, 303 (see also Russia) 
and Persia, 207-13, 250, 252, 256, 

257, 259 
and Turkey, 207- 13, 241 

Space in history, 1, 2, 118, 247 

Spain, 10, 11, 12, 85 

Stamboul, 101, 110, 111, 113 

Standard Oil Co., 169, 171, 175, 178 

State aid in modernizing industry, 77, 
108f., 159, 209, 238f., 257, 269, 
295ff. 

State and Religion, 36, 98f., 233, 251, 

252ff. 

Debts (see Loans) 
modernization, 92f., 107f., 159ff. 

Suez, 119, 121, 171 

Suez Canal, 4, 28, 118, 119-26, 130, 132, 
133, 134, 171, 183, 197, 222 

Sugar, 231, 238, 239, 295 

Suleiman I (Sultan of Turkey), 63f . 

Sumatra, 145 

Sunda Islands, 124 

Sunnites (Mohammedan sect), 52f . 

Sykes, Sir Mark, 199, 222 

Syria, 11, 12, 13, 56, 60, 127, 128, 130, 
131, 133, 139, 144, 145, 151, 157, 
158, 160, 177, 195, 197, 200, 201, 
202, 205, 214, 219, 220, 221, 222, 
224, 227, 257, 260-72, 273, 276, 
277, 282, 285, 297 (see also 
France) 

Syrians, 221, 261, 264, 267, 269, 271 



Talaat Harb Bey, Mohammed 

(Egyptian), 294 
Tariffs, 107, 155, 189, 190, 200, 238, 260, 

291 

Taurus, 128 

Taurus Express, 129, 135 
Taxation, 76, 189, 281, 300 
Technical education (see Europeaniza- 

tion of education) 
progress, 1, 4, 67, 94f,, 160f., 183 
Teheran, 134, 136, 143, 144, 174, 197, 

225, 226, 255, 257 

Tenure, security of (see Agriculture) 
Ternes (in Bussia), 141 
Teutons, 36, 111 

Textile industry, modern, 239, 294 
Thales, 24 
Thrace, 193 

Tigris, 14, 172, 182, 183, 273, 274 
Tobacco, 18, 299f. 
Toleration, 55, 60, 267, 283 (see also 

Islam) 



Trade, traditional, 71, 79, 80, 81 

routes, 5, 30, 56, 115ff., 118, 136 
Trade unions, 279, 296 
Tradition, breach with, 6, lOOf., 244 
Transcaspia, 195 
Transjordania, 131, 133, 182, 205, 222, 

224 

Treaties (see also Secret treaties) : 
Anglo-Iraqi (1930), 173 
Anglo-Persian (1919), 143, 196, 204, 

207, 250 

Anglo-Russian (1907), 249 
Carlowitz (1699), 64 
Congress of Berlin (1878), 214 
Congress of Paris (1856-7), 65, 226 
Congress of Vienna (1815), 65 
Kutchuk Kainardji (1774), 64 
Lausanne (1923), 190, 204, 211, 218, 

232, 242 

London (1915), 199 
San Remo (1920), 177, 180, 182, 201, 

202, 220 

Sevres (1920), 157, 188, 189, 196, 
201, 202, 203, 205, 207, 213, 218, 
220, 242 

Turco-Grecian (1930), 244 
Turkmanchai (1828), 186 
Versailles, 141, 222 
between Great Britain and Ibn Saud 

(1915), 195 

between Soviet Union and Near 

Eastern States, 211, 241, 243, 250 

of the Near Asiatic States, 203, 212, 

225f., 244f. 
Trieste, 124, 125 
Tripoli (in Syria), 54, 59, 134, 136, 145, 

176, 182, 183, 264 
Tripolitania (Italian Colony), 198 
Truce of God, 56 
Tunis, 10 
Turanians, 112 
Turkestan, 7, 149, 150, 235 
Turkey, 12, 77, 968., 129, 130, 1S2, 
134, 144, 150, 157, 173, 179, 192, 
193, 196, 198, 200, 201, 204, 207, 
209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 215, 217, 
224-6, 227, 229-46, 251, 252, 255, 
257, 262, 264, 268, 269, 281, 282, 
290, 302 

education, 103, 105ff. 
foreign policy, 225f., 242-5 
industrialization, 11 Of., 160, 230f., 

239ff. 

modernization of language, 101 
reforms in modern, 92, 96&, 188 
Turkish banks, 239f . 
Turkization of Islam, 92, 96ft, 188 
of trade and industry, 110, 160, 165, 

237f., 239f, 

Turks, 62, 75, 92, 107, 111, 112, 197, 
200, 207, 217, 221, 222, 225, 228, 
235, 236, 239, 241, 244 (see also 
Anatolians, Committee of Unity 
and Progress) 

Turkish Petroleum Co., 176, 177, 180 
Turkmanchai, (see Treaties) 



INDEX 



329 



Uganda, 156, 157 

Uniformity, tendency to, 2, 69, 91, 227, 

SOSf. 
United States of America, 115, 148, 

149, 150, 153, 166, 167, 168, 169, 

170, 177, 178, 179, 216, 219 
Univerealism, 4, 10, 44, 304 
Universities, 241, 262, 263, 266, 267, 

281, 296 
Usury, 76, 161, 289 

Vasco da Gama, 62 
Venice, 12, 57, 58, 59, 61 
Venizelos, 244 
Victoria, Queen, 136 
Vienna Congress, 65 

Wafd (Egyptian party), 163 
Wahhabites, 51, 74, 223 (see also Ibn 

Saud) 
Wars : American Civil War, 148, 149 

Balkan Wars, 5, 221, 236 

Crimean War, 5, 65 

Greco-Turkish War, 179, 200 

Russo-Japanese War, 249 



Wars: World War, 5, 68, 152, 172f., 
195, 197, 198-206, 215, 216, 217, 
221, 222, 236 

Water question, 17 (see also Drought, 
Irrigation, Rain) 

William II (German Emperor), 127 

Wjllcocks, Sir William, 275 

Wilson, Woodrow, 216, 219 

Wine, 70 

Women, position of, 70, 113f., 233 
education of, 103-5, 106 

Woodlands, 19 

Wool, 21, 231, 270 

Workmen (see Labour) 

World State, 3, 5, 26, 304f . 

Yanbo (port in Hedjaz), 130 
Yemen, 14, 53, 130, 198, 224 
Yussuf Ziya (Turkish author), 111 

Zaghlul Pasha, Saad (Egyptian), 83, 

163, 246, 286, 289 
Zeydites (Mohammedan sect), 53 
Ziya Goek Alp (Turkish author), 92 
Zonguldak coalfield, 231 
Zoroastrions, 35 



'""&-y"". \ 

s& -" Ay--'"" 

;**i^ I = 



ssS^ TJ 

/^/Lrfi^V^lo.; 



yiforar-'-""- 
'im^jaUkq. 

Kabul 



?>''"* ^> 

\ ,T'i 



AUCLDOO, jn(ju/i 

Tehran 

^ //>Y&I4S 

0)Ky ^flfLH 



1... "" I \ 

*Bafnpurj I , 

Ato / 

r ^^sstk- ." 



00 400 600 
* /rrterna&onaJ Boundaries