Historic, Archive Document

Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices.

A99

.16

. F762M

g^MOND I. SWEWSEN FORESTER

SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT RESEARCH REPORTS

Prepared by

SOUTHERN FOREST EXPERIMENT STATION FOREST SERVICE, U. S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE

for the

MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH COMMISSION

under a grant from the Small Business Administration Washington 25, D. C.

This Small Business study, "Mississippi Forest Atlas," has been con- ducted and prepared under the direction of Director Henry H. Leveck, Pro- ject Supervisor for Mississippi State University, and Dr. A. D. Suttle, Jr., Project Director for Mississippi Industrial and Technological Research Com- mission.

The research was financed by a grant made by the Small Business Administration, United States Government, under the authority of Public Law 699 (85th Congress).

Only a limited number of copies of this report have been printed. It is available for reference in any of the Small Business Administration offices throughout the United States or at many reference libraries. Copies of the report also may be obtained without charge directly from Mississippi Agri- cultural Experiment Station, State College, Mississippi.

Summaries of this study are being printed and will be available in reasonable quantities. These summaries may be secured from SBA field offices or from the Small Business Administration, VVashington 25, D. C.

The Small Business Administration assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of the data contained herein, nor does it necessarily endorse any opinions, conclusions,or recommendations which may be a part of this report.

John E. Horne

Administrator

Small Business Administration

MISSISSIPPI FOREST ATLAS

eJi&ikeSit £. Stefisutyhe

* F5' v\>5'

o. \;v

.**&r

'V°'J oS

*?&2

Prepared by

SOUTHERN FOREST EXPERIMENT STATION

under a Small Business Administration grant awarded to the

MISSISSIPPI INDUSTRIAL AND TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH COMMISSION

Project Director

H. H. LEVECK

Director, Mississippi Agricultural Experiment Station

1962

Contents

Page

Mississippi forests: an industrial resource _ 1

Timber resources 1

Opportunities for forest industry expansion _ _ . 2

Accuracy of the survey 4

Definitions of terms 4

Forest resource maps 7

1. Commercial forest land 8

2. Major forest-type groups 9

3. Change in commercial forest area, 1948-57 10

4. Forest-industry ownership 11

5. Change in number of growing stock trees, 1948-57 12

6. Pine sawtimber 13

7 Ash sawtimber 14

8. Cottonwood sawtimber 15

9. Willow sawtimber 16

10. White elm sawtimber 17

11. Tupelo and blackgum sawtimber 18

12. Sweetgum sawtimber - 19

13. Hickory sawtimber 20

14. Pecan sawtimber 21

15. Sweetbay and magnolia sawtimber 22

16. Yellow-poplar sawtimber 23

17. Red oak sawtimber 24

18. White oak sawtimber 25

19. Hackberry sawtimber 26

20. Sycamore sawtimber 27

21. Beech sawtimber 28

22. Hardwood sawtimber in standard factory lumber logs 29

23. Average volume per acre of pine sawtimber in softwood types 30

24. Average volume per acre of hardwood sawtimber

in softwood types _■ 31

25. Average sawtimber volume per acre in hardwood types . 32

26. Relationship of growth and cut of softwood sawtimber ____ 33

27. Relationship of growth and cut of hardwood sawtimber ____ 34

28. Output of pine pulpwood, 1959 35

29. Output of industrial softwood (except pulpwood), 1959 . 36

30. Output of hardwood pulpwood, 1959 37

31. Output of industrial hardwood (except pulpwood), 1959 38

Tables 39

1. Sawtimber volume by species 1

2. Growing stock volume by species group and county .... - 40

3. Growing stock volume by diameter group and county 42

4. Sawtimber volume by species group and county 44

5. Sawtimber volume by diameter group and county 46

6. Land area and commercial forest by county 48

iii

Forest Survey regions in Mississippi.

IV

Mississippi Forests: An Industrial Resource

In the search for resources to support indus- trial expansion in Mississippi, it is logical to turn to the forests. The area occupied by forests in Mississippi exceeds the combined acreage in all other land uses. Each year tre- mendous quantities of pine and hardwood are taken from these forests and made into a wide variety of products.

This report provides information to assist managers of wood-using industries and con- sulting foresters in appraising locations and categories of standing timber that may offer possibilities for development. It is based main- ly upon data gathered during the most recent Forest Survey of Mississippi, which was com- pleted in 1957 by the Southern Forest Experi- ment Station. It also draws upon the previous survey of 1948 in order to show the changes that have been occurring. The information is largely in the form of generalized maps that describe various aspects of the forest situation, such as the geographic distribution of timber volume, woodland area, and output of timber products.

TIMBER RESOURCES

Forests predominantly of longleaf and slash pine characterize the lower Coastal Plain and comprise 2 million of Mississippi’s 17.2 million woodland acres. Extending north from the coastal region, loblolly and shortleaf pine cover 4.6 million acres. Another 2.7 million acres of uplands are occupied by oak, hickory, and other hardwoods in mixture with various pines. In the Delta and along rivers and streams through- out the State are stands of bottom-land hard- woods that aggregate 3.8 million acres. Upland hardwood forests, largely concentrated in a zone bordering the eastern edge of the Mis- sissippi River alluvial plain, total 4.1 million acres.

As is shown in table 1, pine makes up 51 percent of the sawtimber inventory in Mis- sissippi forests. Other softwoods cypress and redcedar total scarcely 2 percent. Of the hardwood volume, oaks account for 36 percent, gums 27 percent, hickories 9 percent; and the remaining 28 percent consists of other hard- woods, with yellow-poplar, elm, cottonwood, magnolia, willow, ash, beech, sycamore, and hackberry ranking in the order named.

Table 1. Sawtimber volume by species

Species

Volume

Million board feet

Pine

12,972.3

Other softwoods

565.1

Red oaks

2,544.6

White oaks

1,730.0

Pecan

354.7

Other hickories

781.0

Sweetgum

1,934.8

Tupelo and blackgum

1,318.2

Cottonwood

453.5

Willow

318.5

Soft maples

89.5

Yellow-poplar

498.9

Sweetbay and magnolia

327.6

White elm

258.9

Other elms

228.1

Ash

271.8

Hackberry

161.7

Beech

241.5

Sycamore

240.5

Other hardwoods

255.5

Total

25,546.7

In general, quality specifications are more demanding for hardwood than for pine. Among the several industrial uses of hardwoods, the manufacture of standard factory lumber pre- dominates. Suitability of logs for this purpose, therefore, may be taken as one measure of the

variability as well as the utility of the current hardwood inventory.

Nearly 9 billion board feet of Mississippi’s standing hardwood is in logs of standard fac- tory lumber grade. Of this, some 30 percent is in grades 1 and 2 the logs most generally in demand by sawmills, veneer plants, and other industries needing clear material. The 6 billion board feet of grade 3 volume simply consist of the lowest grade of logs that are suitable for conversion into standard lumber, in the sense that they are capable of yielding practical proportions of clear cuttings.

These grades, developed by the U. S. Forest Products Laboratory, take into account the diameter, length, and amount of defects in indi- vidual logs. 1 Studies have shown that they dependably predict the lumber grade outturn of logs of specified grade. For nearly all species tested, the yield of No. 1 Common and better lumber in grade 1 logs varies from 65 to 80 percent; in grade 2 logs from 40 to 64 percent; and in grade 3 logs from 13 to 36 percent.

The remaining 3 billion board feet of hard- wood inventory is in tie and timber logs logs with so many sound defects that they will not produce worthwhile amounts of clear material, when sawn wholly into lumber. They are presently suited, however, for such uses as heavy structural material, crating, and cross- ties.

Both the relative density and the dispersion of the timber within the State vary widely by species ( see figs. 6-22 ) . Broadly speaking, the greatest concentration of pine sawtimber is in the southeastern and southwestern sections. Among hardwoods, oaks greatly exceed all others not only in volume but in extent of distribution. Hickory, sweetgum, and black- gum also range widely, the latter two attaining their best development in the bottom lands. Yellow-poplar is thinly scattered east of the Delta. Ash and white elm, though widely dis- persed, are most common in the western part of the State. Cottonwood, willow, pecan, syca- more, and hackberry are most prominent in the Mississippi River bottoms. Magnolia is found mainly in the southeastern counties, beech, in the southwest.

1 For detailed specifications of log grades, see Hardwood log grades for standard lumber: proposals and results. U. S.

Forest Serv. Forest Prod. Lab. Rpt. D1737. 1949.

That Mississippi timber is suitable for many useful and marketable products is partly dem- onstrated by the number and variety of timber- connected industries operating in the State about 1,000 sawmills, 7 woodpulp mills, and some 100 other plants manufacturing such items as veneer, cooperage, poles, handle stock, shuttle blocks, furniture dimension, and char- coal.

OPPORTUNITIES FOR FOREST INDUSTRY EXPANSION

What about opportunities for new industrial development based upon utilization of current timber resources?

Pulp and paper is presently the fastest grow- ing segment of Mississippi’s forest industry. In response to plant expansion within the State and in peripheral areas, pulpwood production ( mainly pine ) has risen to 2 million cords annually; 25 years ago the State’s output was less than 300,000 cords. Opportunities for further increasing the pulpwood cut are prom- ising. Not only is pine in measurably greater supply today than it was a decade ago, but cur- rent growth is well in excess of the annual harvest. Moreover, a 75-percent increase since 1948 in numbers of pines 2 to 4 inches in diameter points to further improvement in pulpwood supplies, if fire protection and other essential forestry programs are continued and strengthened.

Mississippi is also a top-ranking producer of southern pine poles. Most of the annual pole harvest is shipped to the 16 pressure treating plants in the State. One recent study indicated that more than two-thirds of the poles received at treating plants in the South are 16 to 35 feet in length. These lengths can be readily cut from pines 8 to 20 inches in diameter size classes that are now increasing in number in Mississippi. Nationwide, the number of utility poles in service has been rising and is expected to increase further. Too, in recent years a growing market has developed for poles used in barns, storage sheds, and other types of structures. Though demand for poles is expected to heighten, it will probably be met by greater output from existing firms rather than by new installations.

For the immediate future, possibilities for development of new industry based upon pri-

2

mary conversion of sawtimber are obviously more limited for hardwood than for pine, in view of the heavy use already being made of such material. Nevertheless there are still localities where some slack can be found.

In the north Mississippi area embracing Cal- houn, Itawamba, Lafayette, Lee, Marshall, Tate, Tippah, Tishomingo, and Union Counties, hardwood sawtimber volume has increased some 36 percent since 1948. More than half of the 2.9 million acres in these nine counties is forested. The area, which displays con- siderable physiographic variation, encompasses some excellent hardwood sites such as the brown loam soils in Lafayette, Tate, and Mar- shall Counties, as well as the alluvial soils along the Cold water, Tallahatchie, Yacona, Yalabusha, and other waterways.

The 752 thousand acres of hardwood forests in the 9 counties average 1,300 board feet per acre. But in the bottom lands, which support two-fifths of the hardwood sawtimber, the average is over 2,200 board feet. By way of contrast, the statewide average of bottom-land sawtimber volume is only 1,700 board feet per acre. Of the 1.2 billion board feet of hardwood sawtimber in the 9 counties, 44 percent is oak, 27 percent is gum, and the rest is mainly in a variety of firm-textured species like hickory and ash.

Hardwood sawtimber volume has also risen during the past decade in Forrest, George, Greene, Hancock, Jackson, Pearl River, Perry, and Stone Counties. Forests occupy 78 percent of the 3 million acres of land area in these 8 southeast counties. Hardwood sawtimber vol- ume— up 46 percent since 1948 now totals one billion board feet; two-thirds is on the 325 thousand acres of bottom-land forests, which average 2,400 board feet per acre. The bot- toms are chiefly along the Pearl and Pasca- goula Rivers and their tributaries.

The hardwood volume in the southeast is predominantly in soft-textured species that are suitable for conversion into veneer as well as lumber. Some 45 percent of the volume is gum, 26 percent other soft-textured species, and 29 percent firm-textured species, largely red oak.

The ownership pattern of the 8-county hard- wood resource affords an indication of its relative availability. Some 9 percent of the

volume is on public lands (chiefly national forest), while 13 percent is on forest industry holdings, and 78 percent on other types of private ownerships. Except for a somewhat lower proportion of public stumpage, this own- ership pattern is much like that of the 9-county area cited earlier.

In sections where hardwoods are already being heavily used, near-term expanion of wood-using industry can come in part through more intensive utilization of the available raw material. Where it can be done economically, one means is by increasing secondary manu- facture, so as to produce more finished prod- ucts. Another is by making use of lower quality timber and perhaps of the leavings of sawmills, planing mills, and other plants.

Long-range possibilities for growth in secon- dary industry appear favorable. The move- ment, in fact, is already under way. Primary manufacturers have advanced it in the process of diversification and in undertaking further manufacture of their products. Independent secondary manufacture, too, has expanded, as witness the growth of the furniture industry at New Albany, Tupelo, Okolona, Eupora, Le- land, Meridian, and elsewhere.

In conjunction with the expansion of the State’s furniture industry, the particle-board market gives promise of continuing to grow. Manufacture of particle board involves mixing small fractions of wood with resins and com- pressing the mixture into boards of various thicknesses. These boards, which can be made from available low-grade hardwood, are used for a number of purposes, including wall panel- ling and core stock for furniture.

Basic to the security and expansion of both primary and secondary manufacture is good management of the timber resource. In antici- pation of greater long-term demand for timber, pine management programs have already been expanded and intensified in many parts of the State, especially on forest-industry lands and public holdings. An additional motivation for the programs on industrial ownerships is the need for assured supplies of raw material to protect capital investments. Both public agen- cies and forest industries are also sponsoring programs of technical assistance to stimulate forestry on small ownerships. Although man- agement is progressing more rapidly in pine

3

than in hardwoods, educational efforts are developing a wider appreciation of the out- standing opportunities for managing industrial hardwoods on suitable sites. The recent in- crease in demand for pulping hardwoods may stimulate management too.

Mississippi’s forest soils have the capacity to produce a much greater volume of wood than they are currently growing. It can be reasonably assumed that, with application of minimum forestry practices on all commercial timberlands, net annual growth might be raised eventually from 0.5 cord per acre to nearly 1 cord. This would permit the State to enjoy an even greater forest industry than it now does. A still higher average growth can prob- ably be attained under intensive management. The prescription for continued forward move- ment includes minimizing wildfire, restocking idle land, and removing trees that have little or no utility. Given good timber resources, wood-using industry will thrive, and the two will perpetuate each other.

ACCURACY OF THE SURVEY

The data on forest acreage and timber volume in this report were secured in 1956-57 with a systematic sampling method involving a forest- nonforest classification on aerial photographs and on-the-ground measurements of trees at sample points. The sample points were taken in pairs at and near the intersections of a grid of lines spaced 3 miles apart. Tally trees were selected with a 3.03 diopter prism.

Accuracy of the estimates may be affected by two types of errors. The first stems from the use of a sample to estimate the whole and from variability of the items being sampled. This type is termed sampling error; it is sus- ceptible to a mathematical evaluation of the probability of error. The second type often referred to as reporting or estimating error derives from mistakes in measurement, judg- ment, arithmetic, or recording, and limitations of method or equipment. Effects cannot be appraised mathematically, but the Forest Sur- vey constantly attempts to hold such error to a minimum by proper training and good supervision, and by emphasis on careful work.

Statistical analysis of the data indicates a sampling error of plus or minus 0.3 percent for the estimate of total forest area, 1.4 percent

for total cubic volume, and 1.9 percent for total board-foot volume. When acreage and volume totals for the State are broken down by county and other subdivisions of the data, the possibility of error increases and is greatest for the smallest items. The order of this in- crease is suggested in the following tabulation, which shows the sampling error to which the estimates are liable two chances out of three.

Forest area

Cubic volume

Board-foot volume

Size of area sampled

Sampling error 1

Volume

sampled

Sampling error -

Volume

sampled

Sampling error -

Thousand.

Percent Million

Percent

Million Percent

acres

CU. ft.

b d. ft.

17,000

0.3

7,600

1.4

26,000

1.9

10,000

4

6,000

1.6

20,000

2.1

5,000

.6

3,000

2.2

10,000

3.0

2,000

.9

1,000

3.8

5,000

4.3

500

1.8

500

5.5

2,000

6.8

100

3.9

100

12.2

300

17.5

1 By random-sampling formula.

- Estimated by use of a procedure described by D. B. DeLury in Values and Integrals of the Orthogonal Polynomials up to n = 26. Univ. Toronto Press, 33 pp. Toronto, Ont. 1950.

County data on timber volumes have been included in the report in order to permit adding counties totalling enough volume to meet a desired degree of reliability. To obtain an esti- mate of growing stock with a sampling error of plus or minus 10 percent, data for enough counties must be added together to total about 150 million cubic feet. A comparable sampling error for sawtimber volume requires about 1,000 million board feet.

DEFSN9TIONS OF TERMS

Forest Land Class

Forest land. Includes: (a) land which is at least 10 percent stocked by trees of any size and capable of producing timber or other wood products, or of exerting an influence on the climate or on the water regime; (b) land from which the trees have been removed to less than 10 percent stocking and which has not been developed for other use; (c) afforested areas.

Commercial forest land. Forest land which is (a) producing, or is physically capable of producing, usable crops of wood ( usually saw- timber ) , ( b ) economically available now or prospectively, and (c) not withdrawn from timber utilization.

4

Noncommercial forest land. Forest land ( a ) withdrawn from timber utilization through statute, ordinance, or administrative order but which otherwise qualifies as commercial forest land, and (b) incapable of yielding usable wood products (usually sawtimber) because of ad- verse site conditions, or so physically inacces- sible as to be unavailable economically in the foreseeable future.

Tree Species

Commercial species. Includes species that normally have value for commercial timber products; excludes so-called weed or noncom- mercial species such as blackjack oak, scrub post oak, blue beech, and sourwood.

Softwoods. Coniferous species, of which the most numerous are loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), shortleaf pine (P. echinata), and long- leaf pine (P. palustris).

Hardwoods. Broadleaved species, of which the most numerous are the oaks ( Quercus spp. ) and sweetgum ( Liquidambar styraciflua).

Softwood Forest Types

Longleaf-slash pine. Forests in which 50 percent or more of the stand is longleaf or slash pine, singly or in combination. Common associates include other southern pines, oak, and gum.

Loblolly-shortleaf pine. Forests in which 50 percent or more of the stand is loblolly pine, shortleaf pine, or other southern yellow pines excepting longleaf or slash pine, singly or in combination. Common associates include oak, hickory, and gum.

Oak-pine. Forests in which 50 percent or more of the stand is hardwoods, usually up- land oaks, but in which southern pines make up 25-49 percent of the stand. Common asso- ciates include gum, hickory, and yellow-poplar.

Hardwood Forest Types

Oak-hickory. Forests in which 50 percent or more of the stand is upland oaks or hickory, singly or in combination, except where pines comprise 25-49 percent in which case the stand would be classified oak-pine. Common asso- ciates include yellow-poplar, elm, maple, and black walnut.

Oak-gum-cypress. Bottom-land forests in which 50 percent or more of the stand is tu-

pelo, blackgum, sweetgum, oaks, or southern cypress, singly or in combination, except where pines comprise 25-49 percent, in which case the stand would be classified oak-pine. Com- mon associates include cottonwood, willow, ash, elm, hackberry, and maple.

Elm-ash-cottonwood. Forests in which 50 percent or more of the stand is elm, ash, or cottonwood, singly or in combination. Common associates include willow, sycamore, beech, and maple.

Diameter

D.b.h. (Diameter breast high). Tree dia- meter in inches, outside bark, measured at 4-M> feet above ground.

Diameter class. The 2-inch diameter classes extend from 1.0 inch below to 0.9 inch above the stated midpoint. Thus, the 12-inch class takes in trees 11.0 inches to and including 12.9 inches d.b.h.

Class of Timber

Sawtimber trees. Live trees of commercial species, at least 9.0 inches d.b.h. in softwoods and 11.0 inches d.b.h. in hardwoods, and con- taining at least a 12-foot merchantable butt log or, if the butt log is a cull, at least 50 percent of the gross sawlog volume is fn merchantable logs. To be merchantable, a log must meet the following requirements:

(a) In softwoods, logs that have a minimum 6-inch small-end diameter inside bark and that are at least one-third sound, with sweep or crook not exceeding two- thirds the small-end diameter.

(b) In hardwoods, logs that have a mini- mum 8-inch small-end diameter inside bark and that meet the specifications of a standard lumber log or a tie and tim- ber log.

Poletimber trees. Trees of commercial spe- cies which meet regional specifications of soundness and form, and which are of the following diameters at breast height: soft-

woods 5.0 to 9.0 inches, hardwoods 5.0 to 11.0 inches. Such trees will usually become saw- timber trees if left to grow.

Seedling and sapling trees. Live trees of commercial species less than 5.0 inches in

5

diameter at breast height and of good form and vigor.

Cull trees. Live trees of sawtimber or pole- timber size that are unmerchantable for saw- logs now or prospectively because of defect, rot, or species.

Volume

Sawtimber volume. Net volume in board feet, International 14-inch rule, of live saw- timber trees to a specified merchantable top.

Growing stock. Net volume in cubic feet of live sawtimber and live poletimber trees from stump to a minimum 4.0-inch top diameter (of central stem) inside bark.

Miscellaneous Definitions

Net annual growth of sawtimber. The change, resulting from natural causes, in net

board-foot volume of live sawtimber on com- mercial forest land during a specified year.

Net annual growth of growing stock. The change, resulting from natural causes, in net cubic-foot volume of growing stock on com- mercial forest land during a specified year.

Annual cut of sawtimber. The net board- foot volume of live sawtimber trees cut or killed by logging, and by cultural operations, on commercial forest land during a specified year.

Annual cut of growing stock. The net cubic- foot volume of live sawtimber and poletimber trees cut or killed by logging, or by cultural operations, on commercial forest land during a specified year.

Timber products output. The volume of timber products cut from both growing stock and other sources.

6

Forest Resource Maps

Figure 1. Proportion of commercial forest land.

8

mmm

Wm^mm

m$m

0m

mwMf

raw

tgpigfe

.

MMH

kf.' Z--1

Imiw#

wfe. I

1 IK

Sippe

i* -:

m£&&v'k'i

MMI

Predominantly softwood types Predominantly hardwood types

Figure 2. Distribution of major forest-type groups

9

10

Figure 3. Change in commercial forest area between surveys (1948-57 ).

Figure 4. Proportion of commercial forest land in forest industry ownership.

11

Figure 5. Change in number of growing stock trees between surveys (1948-57), by survey region, species group, and tree diameter class.

12

Figure 6. Pine sawtimber volume.

14

Figure 8. Cottonwood sawtimber volume.

15

16

Figure 10. White elm sawtimber volume.

17

Each dot represents an average of 500,000 board feet. Counties in which the volume sampled in 1957 exceeded the 1948 sample are shown in green.

18

Figure 11. Tupelo and blackgum sawtimber volume.

' *. *1. .*..••••!

. . P 1 . , . I* , » •*

•••••;• k_° 0 e , .

. * I

I . .-v : jr -

V -i

* .r

! . *.;•

•j 1_| ^ ^ ^ . ,

.TT-

ess®X *.

:• ’-V : '. : -I. \ -Cv

sj •: ,

) < '•

/-F •• . r

XV . !

IT"* . .

. * . . . •!. . . i.

. . ; . •••«••• I. •j5' .

_1_4 -•/ . * * *

r *•

i*

•I*.::*.- *. •! .

C « t » ! i ■)* j— u

Each dot represents an average of 500,000 board feet. Counties in which the volume sampled in 1957 exceeded the 1948 sample are shown in green.

Figure 12. Sweetgum sawtimber volume.

19

Each dot represents an average of 500,000 board feet. Counties in which the volume sampled in 1957 exceeded the 1948 sample are shown in green.

Figure 13. Hickory sawtimber volume.

20

21

Figure 15. Sweetbay and magnolia sawtimber volume.

22

Figure 16. Yellow-poplar sawtimber volume.

23

I

Figure 18. White oak sawtimber volume.

25

Figure 19. Hackberry sawtimber volume.

26

Figure 20. Sycamore sawtimber volume.

27

Figure 21. Beech sawtimber volume.

28

Figure 22. Hardwood, sawtimber volume in standard factory lumber logs

29

30

Figure 23. Average volume per acre of softwood sawtimber in softwood types.

Figure 24. Average volume per acre of hardwood sawtimber in softwood types.

31

More than 2,000 board feet 1,000-2,000 board feet Less than 1,000 board feet

32

Figure 25. Average sawtimber volume per acre in hardwood types.

Figure 26. Relationship of growth and cut of softwood sawtimber volume, 1956.

33

34

Figure 27. Relationship of growth and cut of hardwood sawtimber volume, 1956.

Figure 28. Output of pine pulpwood, 1959. Source

State Tax Commission.

35

Figure 29. Output of industrial softwood products (except pulpwood), 1959. Source: State Tax Commission.

36

Figure 30. Output of hardwood pulpwood, 1959. Source: State Tax Commission.

37

Figure 31. Output of industrial hardwood products (except pulpwood), 1959. Source: State Tax Commission.

38

Tables

Table 2. Growing stock volume by species group and county

County

All

species

Softwood

Soft

hardwood

Hard

hardwooc

i

Total

j Pine |

Other

Total

Gum

Other 1

Total

Oak

Other 2

Million cubic feet

Adams

116.6

29.4

29.4

34.6

13.7

20.9

52.6

26.6

26.0

Alcorn

42.1

9.6

9.0

.6

9.3

5.1

4.2

23.2

16.2

7.0

Amite

129.8

85.7

85.5

.2

11.3

9.5

1.8

32.8

27.6

5.2

Attala

68.8

22.1

21.0

1.1

22.6

19.0

3.6

24.1

15.2

8.9

Benton

60.4

21.7

21.6

.1

11.8

7.6

4.2

26.9

19.0

7.9

Bolivar

60.1

7.7

7.7

33.0

6.7

26.3

19.4

5.3

14.1

Calhoun

76.2

32.9

32.9

13.5

12.0

1.5

29.8

21.9

7.9

Carroll

67.0

4.0

4.0

23.4

19.3

4.1

39.6

27.2

12.4

Chickasaw

32.4

13.5

13.5

3.0

3.0

15.9

12.4

3.5

Choctaw

59.1

30.6

30.6

12.5

9.7

2.8

16.0

13.3

2.7

Claiborne

129.4

12.8

12.2

.6

49.8

29.8

20.0

66.8

28.7

38.1

Clarke

188.9

126.6

126.3

.3

25.7

20.9

4.8

36.6

27.3

9.3

Clay

73.5

4.4

4.1

3

9.2

7.1

2.1

59.9

44.8

15.1

Coahoma

50.8

1.3

1.3

14.1

2.3

11.8

35.4

5.5

29.9

Copiah

174.6

94.9

94.5

.4

33.5

27.9

5.6

46.2

29.0

17.2

Covington

61.2

15.5

15.5

29.0

21.6

7.4

16.7

10.4

6.3

De Soto

43.2

1.6

1.6

15.8

11.3

4.5

25.8

10.9

14.9

Forrest

82.2

58.1

58.1

16.2

10.4

5.8

7.9

6.0

1.9

Franklin

191.8

134.5

134.5

19.7

15.2

4.5

37.6

23.0

14.6

George

125.3

75.3

71.8

3.5

31.6

16.9

14.7

18.4

9.7

8.7

Greene

141.0

84.5

83.6

.9

27.7

19.6

8.1

28.8

24.0

4.8

Grenada

51.2

16.2

15.8

.4

14.9

14.5

.4

20.1

10.5

9.6

Hancock

74.4

43.6

43.3

.3

27.8

20.3

7.5

3.0

3.0

Harrison

123.4

96.4

96.4

23.0

10.1

12.9

4.0

1.2

2.8

Hinds

82.6

15.2

14.5

.7

25.2

18.9

6.3

42.2

25.0

17.2

Holmes

82.1

21.6

20.8

.8

26.0

18.0

8.0

34.5

24.1

10.4

Humphreys

35.8

6.1

6.1

29.7

24.7

5.0

Issaquena

84.0

3.1

3.1

15.1

5.1

10.0

65.8

24.1

41.7

Itawamba r

76.8

22.0

21.9

.1

22.8

15.5

7.3

32.0

16.8

15.2

Jackson

159.9

90.3

86.3

4.0

55.5

44.9

10.6

14.1

9.8

4.3

Jasper

191.2

113.7

111.9

1.8

41.0

29.7

11.3

36.5

19.8

16.7

Jefferson

165.9

101.3

63.4

37.9

28.7

17.9

10.8

35.9

16.8

19.1

Jefferson Davis

62.4

23.6

23.6

21.5

16.1

5.4

17.3

10.8

6.5

Jones

115.4

64.2

64.2

22.0

11.3

10.7

29.2

22.9

6.3

Kemper

143.9

69.3

68.2

1.1

42.7

39.9

2.8

31.9

20.7

11.2

Lafayette

117.5

38.9

38.8

.1

21.2

17.8

3.4

57.4

45.1

12.3

Lamar

109.9

76.5

76.5

21.5

9.3

12.2

11.9

9.5

2.4

Lauderdale

163.5

91.7

91.7

26.3

21.1

5.2

45.5

30.1

15.4

Lawrence

96.7

43.6

43.6

14.1

12.0

2.1

39.0

26.2

12.8

Leake

95.5

52.4

52.3

.1

15.6

13.5

2.1

27.5

24.8

2.7

Lee

14.4

5.2

5.2

1.5

.7

.8

7.7

4.9

2.8

Leflore

31.0

9.3

9.3

21.7

10.6

11.1

40

Table 2. Growing stock volume by species group and county (Continued)

County

All

species

Softwood

Soft

hardwood

Hard

hardwood

Total

Pine

Other

Total

Gum

Other 1

Total

Oak |

Other 2

Million cubic feet

Lincoln

112.1

54.2

53.8

.4

22.0

12.7

9.3

35.9

23.0

12.9

Lowndes

52.3

11.1

6.2

4.9

15.1

12.3

2.8

26.1

14.7

11.4

Madison

75.5

23.9

22.5

1.4

16.4

13.5

2.9

35.2

20.9

14.3

Marion

128.2

59.6

59.6

25.2

20.1

5.1

43.4

29.6

13.8

Marshall

73.5

12.8

11.3

1.5

29.2

14.1

15.1

31.5

23.6

7.9

Monroe

79.7

20.8

20.8

21.3

18.1

3.2

37.6

26.9

10.7

Montgomery

36.9

14.5

14.5

6.0

5.8

.2

16.4

12.1

4.3

Neshoba

135.4

56.2

56.2

40.6

36.9

3.7

38.6

30.0

8.6

Newton

89.8

37.2

37.2

16.4

13.0

3.4

36.2

26.3

9.9

Noxubee

102.8

52.6

52.3

.3

9.3

9.3

40.9

29.1

11.8

Oktibbeha

58.0

25.7

24.1

1.6

3.1

2.4

.7

29.2

23.8

5.4

Panola

33.7

.7

.7

14.0

10.4

3.6

19.0

11.5

7.5

Pearl River

156.2

91.0

91.0

53.6

24.3

29.3

11.6

9.7

1.9

Perry

152.4

113.4

112.9

.5

22.5

17.0

5.5

16.5

14.5

2.0

Pike

77.7

25.0

25.0

20.5

18.7

1.8

32.2

23.9

8.3

Pontotoc

38.7

14.2

14.2

4.5

4.3

.2

20.0

10.0

10.0

Prentiss

31.8

8.0

7.9

.1

6.9

6.0

.9

16.9

13.4

3.5

Quitman

24.6

1.8

1.8

11.2

8.4

2.8

11.6

5.0

6.6

Rankin

188.0

81.7

78.9

2.8

27.0

25.7

1.3

79.3

57.3

22.0

Scott

140.3

100.7

100.7

14.7

13.5

1.2

24.9

17.6

7.3

Sharkey

49.0

2.5

2.5

9.9

9.6

.3

36.6

23.7

12.9

Simpson

94.7

41.3

41.3

19.3

17.4

1.9

34.1

23.3

10.8

Smith

132.0

81.8

81.8

24.4

20.7

3.7

25.8

20.7

5.1

Stone

100.7

61.6

60.3

1.3

28.7

13.0

15.7

10.4

9.9

.5

Sunflower

8.6

2.6

2.6

.6

.6

5.4

4.7

.7

Tallahatchie

46.6

8.5

4.7

3.8

11.5

11.5

26.6

18.0

8.6

Tate

33.4

.1

.1

14.7

11.9

2.8

18.6

4.7

13.9

Tippah

51.3

14.7

14.7

9.8

7.1

2.7

26.8

19.5

7.3

Tishomingo

79.9

39.2

39.2

17.0

12.1

4.9

23.7

17.4

6.3

Tunica

59.5

2.5

2.5

30.6

3.2

27.4

26.4

4.0

22.4

Union

55.7

19.3

19.3

18.4

12.8

5.6

18.0

11.9

6.1

Walthall

48.8

14.6

12.4

2.2

24.9

18.6

6.3

9.3

7.3

2.0

Warren

153.5

6.3

3.9

2.4

67.9

33.8

34.1

79.3

38.2

41.1

Washington

55.3

.5

.5

27.4

7.8

19.6

27.4

10.3

17.1

Wayne

199.6

134.5

134.5

24.3

17.6

6.7

40.8

31.4

9.4

Webster

42.4

18.8

18.8

5.7

4.6

1.1

17.9

13.1

4.8

Wilkinson

215.5

124.7

116.1

8.6

27.9

23.9

4.0

62.9

25.3

37.6

Winston

154.2

62.8

62.8

33.2

29.1

4.1

58.2

43.5

14.7

Yalobusha

49.0

12.2

11.7

.5

9.2

6.3

2.9

27.6

23.1

4.5

Yazoo

119.8

4.2

1.5

2.7

38.6

28.0

10.6

77.0

37.4

39.6

All counties

7,589.0

3,313.3

3,198.6

114.7

1,752.6

1,216.1

536.5

2,523.1

1,595.7

927.4

1 Includes cottonwood, willow, yellow-poplar, and the like.

2 Includes ash, hickory, sycamore, and the like.

41

Table 3. Growing stock volume by diameter group and county

County

All

species

Softwood

Soft hardwood

Hard hardwood

Total

6-12

inches

14 inches and up

Total

6-12

inches

14 inches and up

Total

6-12

inches

14 inches and up

Million cubic feet

Adams

116.6

29.4

6.6

22.8

34.6

10.6

24.0

52.6

17.9

34.7

Alcorn

42.1

9.6

7.7

1.9

9.3

5.2

4.1

23.2

16.7

6.5

Amite

129.8

85.7

43.0

42.7

11.3

8.2

3.1

32.8

19.7

13.1

Attala

68.8

22.1

18.4

3.7

22.6

14.4

8.2

24.1

13.2

10.9

Benton

60.4

21.7

19.0

2.7

11.8

8.1

3.7

26.9

21.4

5.5

Bolivar

60.1

7.7

2.3

5.4

33.0

8.1

24.9

19.4

8.7

10.7

Calhoun

76.2

32.9

29.5

3.4

13.5

6.1

7.4

29.8

14.9

14.9

Carroll

67.0

4.0

3.3

.7

23.4

16.3

7.1

39.6

19.1

20.5

Chickasaw

32.4

13.5

10.0

3.5

3.0

2.4

.6

15.9

11.4

4.5

Choctaw

59.1

30.6

24.4

6.2

12.5

9.3

3.2

16.0

13.9

2.1

Claiborne

129.4

12.8

7.1

5.7

49.8

11.6

38.2

66.8

28.2

38.6

Clarke

188.9

126.6

77.6

49.0

25.7

17.0

8.7

36.6

24.5

12.1

Clay

73.5

4.4

2.9

1.5

9.2

7.3

1.9

59.9

37.1

22.8

Coahoma

50.8

1.3

1.3

14.1

6.1

8.0

35.4

15.1

20.3

Copiah

174.6

94.9

34.2

60.7

33.5

19.5

14.0

46.2

22.8

23.4

Covington

61.2

15.5

7.5

8.0

29.0

14.3

14.7

16.7

7.7

9.0

De Soto

43.2

1.6

.6

1.0

15.8

9.3

6.5

25.8

12.2

13.6

Forrest

82.2

58.1

43.3

14.8

16.2

10.3

5.9

7.9

3.8

4.1

Franklin

191.8

134.5

63.0

71.5

19.7

13.3

6.4

37.6

18.6

19.0

George

125.3

75.3

43.9

31.4

31.6

20.6

11.0

18.4

10.7

7.7

Greene

141.0

84.5

47.6

36.9

27.7

15.1

12.6

28.8

18.4

10.4

Grenada

51.2

16.2

10.2

6.0

14.9

6.9

8.0

20.1

11.3

8.8

Hancock

74.4

43.6

32.9

10.7

27.8

21.4

6.4

3.0

2.1

.9

Harrison

123.4

96.4

74.4

22.0

23.0

13.5

9.5

4.0

3.2

.8

Hinds

82.6

15.2

9.8

5.4

25.2

12.7

12.5

42.2

22.9

19.3

Holmes

82.1

21.6

16.3

5.3

26.0

9.5

16.5

34.5

13.7

20.8

Humphreys

35.8

6.1

3.6

2.5

29.7

9.3

20.4

Issaquena

84.0

3.1

.3

2.8

15.1

1.6

13.5

65.8

21.0

44.8

Itawamba

76.8

22.0

20.2

1.8

22.8

12.5

10.3

32.0

18.8

13.2

Jackson

159.9

90.3

63.2

27.1

55.5

19.3

36.2

14.1

4.7

9.4

Jasper

191.2

113.7

55.0

58.7

41.0

19.4

21.6

36.5

19.3

17.2

Jefferson

165.9

101.3

32.0

69.3

28.7

11.2

17.5

35.9

17.4

18.5

Jefferson Davis

62.4

23.6

14.9

8.7

21.5

17.5

4.0

17.3

8.9

8.4

Jones

115.4

64.2

38.8

25.4

22.0

17.7

4.3

29.2

17.5

11.7

Kemper

143.9

69.3

44.0

25.3

42.7

37.4

5.3

31.9

21.4

10.5

Lafayette

117.5

38.9

26.0

12.9

21.2

11.5

9.7

57.4

20.3

37.1

Lamar

109.9

76.5

50.1

26.4

21.5

11.9

9.6

11.9

8.1

3.8

Lauderdale

163.5

91.7

69.9

21.8

26.3

20.2

6.1

45.5

33.1

12.4

Lawrence

96.7

43.6

31.2

12.4

14.1

7.7

6.4

39.0

21.3

17.7

Leake

95.5

52.4

40.9

11.5

15.6

12.1

3.5

27.5

19.0

8.5

Lee

14.4

5.2

1.7

3.5

1.5

.8

.7

7.7

3.8

3.9

Leflore

31.0

9.3

4.0

5.3

21.7

8.3

13.4

42

Table 3. Growing stock volume by diameter group and county (Continued)

County

All

species

Softwood

Soft hardwood

Hard hardwood

Total

6-12

inches

14 inches and up

Total

6-12

inches

14 inches and up

Total

6-12

inches

14 inches and up

Million cubic jeet

Lincoln

112.1

54.2

24.5

29.7

22.0

11.3

10.7

35.9

17.2

18.7

Lowndes

52.3

11.1

5.0

6.1

15.1

10.7

4.4

26.1

18.8

7.3

Madison

75.5

23.9

10.7

13.2

16.4

7.9

8.5

35.2

19.0

16.2

Marion

128.2

59.6

31.3

28.3

25.2

13.6

11.6

43.4

24.8

18.6

Marshall

73.5

12.8

7.0

5.8

29.2

15.9

13.3

31.5

11.0

20.5

Monroe

79.7

20.8

9.0

11.8

21.3

16.3

5.0

37.6

26.5

11.1

Montgomery

36.9

14.5

9.8

4.7

6.0

5.6

.4

16.4

8.6

7.8

Neshoba

135.4

56.2

38.0

18.2

40.6

27.5

13.1

38.6

22.3

16.3

Newton

89.8

37.2

30.8

6.4

16.4

11.3

5.1

36.2

16.5

19.7

Noxubee

102.8

52.6

30.2

22.4

9.3

8.0

1.3

40.9

28.2

12.7

Oktibbeha

58.0

25.7

11.1

14.6

3.1

2.7

.4

29.2

21.6

7.6

Panola

33.7

.7

.7

14.0

7.4

6.6

19.0

8.1

10.9

Pearl River

156.2

91.0

57.1

33.9

53.6

30.5

23.1

11.6

6.4

5.2

Perry

152.4

113.4

70.6

42.8

22.5

16.3

6.2

16.5

9.9

6.6

Pike

77.7

25.0

18.4

6.6

20.5

9.7

10.8

32.2

12.9

19.3

Pontotoc

38.7

14.2

12.2

2.0

4.5

2.8

1.7

20.0

15.4

4.6

Prentiss

31.8

8.0

7.8

.2

6.9

5.1

1.8

16.9

12.2

4.7

Quitman

24.6

1.8

1.8

11.2

2.6

8.6

11.6

6.8

4.8

Rankin

188.0

81.7

49.8

31.9

27.0

18.3

8.7

79.3

40.8

38.5

Scott

140.3

100.7

61.4

39.3

14.7

8.5

6.2

24.9

17.5

7.4

Sharkey

49.0

2.5

2.5

9.9

1.9

8.0

36.6

9.3

27.3

Simpson

94.7

41.3

19.9

21.4

19.3

14.5

4.8

34.1

23.8

10.3

Smith

132.0

81.8

59.7

22.1

24.4

19.6

4.8

25.8

18.9

6.9

Stone

100.7

61.6

36.5

25.1

28.7

19.8

8.9

10.4

6.8

3.6

Sunflower

8.6

2.6

.7

1.9

.6

.6

5.4

4.2

1.2

Tallahatchie

46.6

8.5

6.9

1.6

11.5

4.1

7.4

26.6

9.0

17.6

Tate

33.4

.1

.1

14.7

6.4

8.3

18.6

13.1

5.5

Tippah

51,3

14.7

14.1

.6

9.8

6.3

3.5

26.8

16.2

10.6

Tishomingo

79.9

39.2

30.4

8.8

17.0

8.2

8.8

23.7

14.5

9.2

Tunica

59.5

2.5

.2

2.3

30.6

5.9

24.7

26.4

8.4

18.0

Union

55.7

19.3

16.2

3.1

18.4

12.3

6.1

18.0

9.2

8.8

Walthall

48.8

14.6

8.2

6.4

24.9

13.6

11.3

9.3

6.4

2.9

Warren

153.5

6.3

1.8

4.5

67.9

20.3

47.6

79.3

25.2

54.1

Washington

55.3

.5

.5

27.4

7.4

20.0

27.4

9.7

17.7

Wayne

199.6

134.5

85.7

48.8

24.3

18.1

6.2

40.8

29.8

11.0

Webster

42.4

18.8

16.6

2.2

5.7

4.4

1.3

17.9

14.0

3.9

Wilkinson

215.5

124.7

52.2

72.5

27.9

15.9

12.0

62.9

24.0

38.9

Winston

154.2

62.8

41.5

21.3

33.2

16.6

16.6

58.2

35.9

22.3

Yalobusha

49.0

12.2

7.7

4.5

9.2

7.0

2.2

27.6

17.0

10.6

Yazoo

119.8

4.2

1.6

2.6

38.6

14.3

24.3

77.0

25.4

51.6

Total

7,589.0

3,313.3

2,009.1

1,304.2

1,752.6

954.1

798.5

2,523.1

1,326.7

1,196.4

43

Table 4. Sawtimber volume by species group and county

County

All

species

Softwood

Soft

hardwood

Hard

hardwood

Total

Pine

Other

Total

Gum

Other 1

Total

Oak

Other :

Adams

493.2

155.2

155.2

141.7

47.4

94.3

196.3

106.6

89.7

Alcorn

102.5

21.1

17.2

3.9

31.0

15.0

16.0

50.4

36.1

14.3

Amite

501.8

394.6

394.6

23 0

19.0

4.0

84.2

70.9

13.3

Attala

160.3

50.9

45.2

5.7

43.7

34.8

8.9

65.7

44.5

21.2

Benton

147.3

78.0

78.0

24.6

13.8

10.8

44.7

38.9

5.8

Bolivar

240.7

39.7

39.7

143.3

28.3

115.0

57.7

17.4

40.3

Calhoun

234.6

92.1

92.1

48.7

39.6

9.1

93.8

71.7

22.1

Carroll

176.8

7.5

7.5

44.7

37.8

6.9

124.6

84.0

40.6

Chickasaw

72.1

44.3

44 3

2.9

2.9

24.9

19.8

5.1

Choctaw

140.7

91.7

91.7

28.1

16.7

11.4

20.9

18.0

2.9

Claiborne

501.8

56.6

53.8

2.8

220.3

121.8

98.5

224.9

111.6

113.3

Clarke

735.9

597.5

596.0

1.5

65.5

50.3

15.2

72.9

46.0

26.9

Clay

192.5

19.6

18.0

1.6

15.7

15.7

157.2

116.9

40.3

Coahoma

173.6

6.5

6.5

49.0

3.4

45.6

118.1

13.9

104.2

Copiah

701.7

480.2

479.4

.8

86.7

68.6

18.1

134.8

92.8

42.0

Covington

201.3

63.7

63.7

85.5

57.5

28.0

52.1

28.8

23.3

De Soto

130.3

5.6

5.6

41.8

32.8

9.0

82.9

36.1

46.8

Forrest

280.2

221.1

221.1

37.4

22.7

14.7

21.7

18.6

3.1

Franklin

768.7

606.4

606 4

45.9

25.6

20.3

116.4

67.4

49.0

George

430.2

299.2

281.4

17.8

87.9

37.0

50.9

43.1

18.4

24.7

Greene

545.7

377.1

372.5

4 6

89.3

73.1

16.2

79.3

65.6

13.7

Grenada

154.2

51.3

51.3

52.0

52.0

50.9

28.2

22.7

Hancock

220.8

166.4

166.4

49.6

33.3

16.3

4.8

4.8

Harrison

422.1

352.5

352.5

63.8

22.8

41.0

5.8

2.9

2.9

Hinds

258.3

63.4

61.4

2.0

78.0

56.4

21.6

116.9

78.3

38.6

Holmes

275.6

78.2

75.5

2.7

90.1

62.1

28.0

107.3

78.6

28.7

Humphreys

110.6

16.2

16.2

94.4

76.6

17.8

Issaquena

308.5

16.2

16.2

69.5

22.7

46.8

222.8

82.1

140.7

Itawamba

192.3

40.3

39.9

.4

77.6

53.7

23.9

74.4

31.3

43.1

Jackson

623.5

349.8

325.7

24.1

218.8

174.0

44.8

54.9

40.3

14.6

Jasper

755.5

512.2

501.9

10.3

147.0

93.0

54.0

96.3

48.3

48.0

Jefferson

717.7

521.2

310.6

210.6

102.0

54.6

47.4

94.5

41.3

53.2

Jefferson Davis

177.3

79.3

79.3

48.4

35.5

12.9

49.6

26.5

23.1

Jones

367.2

260.6

260.6

33.6

28.3

5.3

73.0

52.9

20.1

Kemper

380.2

255.6

255.6

58.7

56.4

2.3

65.9

38.7

27.2

Lafayette

430.5

162.8

162.8

61.7

55.1

6.6

206.0

160.1

45.9

Lamar

388.8

318.4

318.4

52.4

19.5

32.9

18.0

11.3

6.7

Lauderdale

454.2

323.7

323.7

49.0

40.2

8.8

81.5

49.1

32.4

Lawrence

295.9

144.4

144.4

34.8

30.0

4.8

116.7

61.4

55.3

Leake

234.8

155.3

155.3

33.6

29.7

3.9

45.9

40.3

5.6

Lee

51.5

24.3

24.3

3.0

1.7

1.3

24.2

16.9

7.3

Leflore

80.0

21.3

21.3

58.7

27.5

31.2

Lincoln

418.5

245.8

244.3

1.5

70.0

39.1

30.9

102.7

58.9

43.8

Lowndes

128.5

47.6

24.7

22.9

31.4

25.4

6.0

49.5

25.0

24.5

44

Table 4. Sawtimber volume by species group and county (Continued)

County

All

species

Softwood

Soft

hardwood

Hard

hardwood

Total

Pine [

Other

Total

Gum

Other 1

Total |

Oak

Other 2

Million board feet

Madison

268.5

112.9

107.1

5.8

51.7

45.4

6.3

103.9

69.8

34.1

Marion

474.7

271.2

271.2

86.7

67.4

19.3

116.8

78.9

37.9

Marshall

257.2

49.1

43.8

5.3

88.2

47.1

41.1

119.9

98.4

21.5

Monroe

185.8

85.3

85.3

29.1

27.1

2.0

71.4

48.5

22.9

Montgomery

96.4

48.5

48.5

4.1

4.1

43.8

29.1

14.7

Neshoba

471.2

220.2

220.2

120.5

113.5

7.0

130.5

103.3

27.2

Newton

245.7

100.2

100.2

44.4

33.2

11.2

101.1

69.7

31.4

Noxubee

342.7

233.0

231.5

1.5

9.3

9.3

100.4

69.2

31.2

Oktibbeha

162.0

117.0

111.8

5.2

2.5

2.5

42.5

34.1

8.4

Panola

89.5

1.0

1.0

31.9

24.7

7.2

56.6

36.4

20.2

Pearl River

556.2

412.6

412.6

117.9

43.0

74.9

25.7

20.6

5.1

Perry

565.6

482.7

479.9

2.8

43.3

38.5

4.8

39.6

32.6

7.0

Pike

242.6

86.4

86.4

56.2

50.3

5.9

100.0

69.4

30.6

Pontotoc

101.3

53.8

53.8

6.9

6.9

40.6

20.8

19.8

Prentiss

53.6

11.7

11.7

10.4

8.8

1.6

31.5

26.6

4.9

Quitman

77.4

11.5

11.5

36.2

25.6

10.6

29.7

10.4

19.3

Rankin

597.7

314.2

297.1

17.1

51.1

49.1

2.0

232.4

160.2

72.2

Scott

471.4

369.8

369.8

49.2

49.2

52.4

38.1

14.3

Sharkey

167.8

11.7

11.7

33.9

33.9

122.2

86.1

36.1

Simpson

312.1

182.5

182.5

51.0

48.9

2.1

78.6

59.7

18.9

Smith

347.7

270.4

270.4

33.9

29.9

4.0

43.4

34.1

9.3

Stone

360.6

265.9

261.3

4.6

71.7

30.3

41.4

23.0

22.1

.9

Sunflower

26.1

15.1

15.1

2.2

2.2

8.8

8.8

Tallahatchie

145.7

28.7

18.3

10.4

38.1

38.1

78.9

49.6

29.3

Tate

80.3

48.4

34.7

13.7

31.9

4.7

27.2

Tippah

105.9

27.4

27.4

23.6

19.0

4.6

54.9

42.1

12.8

Tishomingo

263.1

138.5

138.5 '

54.8

43.2

11.6

69.8

52.4

17.4

Tunica

252.5

14.3

14.3

145.4

10.0

135.4

92.8

7.2

85.6

Union

145.4

57.3

57.3

42.0

24.2

17.8

46.1

33.7

12.4

Walthall

156.3

72.1

58.2

13.9

68.7

56.5

12.2

15.5

11.4

4.1

Warren

597.3

30.7

24.4

6.3

286.6

125.9

160.7

280.0

136.3

143.7

Washington

206.8

2.5

2.5

109.5

30.1

79.4

94.8

38.4

56.4

Wayne

732.5

598.2

598.2

59.5

44.9

14.6

74.8

53.5

21.3

Webster

99.3

63.1

63.1

8.8

1.-8

7.0

27.4

25.2

2.2

Wilkinson

869.1

588.1

545.2

42.9

78.5

68.4

10.1

202.5

84.6

117.9

Winston

524.2

261.3

261.3

111.1

90.7

20.4

151.8

119.1

32.7

Yalobusha

107.1

32.9

31.9

1.0

10.0

8.2

1.8

64.2

54.4

9.8

Yazoo

409.0

17.7

6.7

11.0

116.3

84.3

32.0

275.0

129.8

145.2

All counties

25,546.7

13,537.4

12,972.3

565.1

5,052.8

3,253.0

1,799.8

6,956.5

4,274.6

2,681.9

1 Includes cottonwood, willow, yellow-poplar, and the like.

2 Includes ash, hickory, sycamore, and the like.

45

Table 5. Sawtimber volume by diameter group and county

County

All

species

Softwood

Soft hardwood

Hard hardwood

Total

10-14

inches

16 inches and up

Total

12-14

inches

16 inches and up

Total

12-14

inches

16 inches and up

Million board feet

Adams

493.2

155.2

45.7

109.5

141.7

20.6

121.1

196.3

63.2

133.1

Alcorn

102.5

21.1

17.2

3.9

31.0

20.8

10.2

50.4

30.7

19.7

Amite

501.8

394.6

190.6

204.0

23.0

17.6

5.4

84.2

35.8

48.4

Attala

160.3

50.9

40.1

10.8

43.7

20.9

22.8

65.7

38.7

27.0

Benton

147.3

78.0

78.0

24.6

13.1

11.5

44.7

31.9

12.8

Bolivar

240.7

39.7

12.5

27.2

143.3

23.1

120.2

57.7

11.8

45.9

Calhoun

234.6

92.1

83.8

8.3

48.7

30.5

18.2

93.8

35.4

58.4

Carroll

176.8

7.5

5.2

2.3

44.7

31.6

13.1

124.6

51.9

72.7

Chickasaw

72.1

44.3

26.5

17.8

2.9

1.1

1.8

24.9

13.8

11.1

Choctaw

140.7

91.7

65.5

26.2

28.1

23.3

4.8

20.9

17.1

3.8

Claiborne

501.8

56.6

23.6

33.0

220.3

60.6

159.7

224.9

101.6

123.3

Clarke

735.9

597.5

382.2

215.3

65.5

42.2

23.3

72.9

36.1

36.8

Clay

192.5

19.6

16.3

3.3

15.7

8.0

7.7

157.2

93.4

63.8

Coahoma

173.6

6.5

2.2

4.3

49.0

22.3

26.7

118.1

36.8

81.3

Copiah

701.7

480.2

129.6

350.6

86.7

41.9

44.8

134.8

46.4

88.4

Covington

201.3

63.7

32.6

31.1

85.5

38.8

46.7

52.1

25.2

26.9

De Soto

130.3

5.6

2.5

3.1

41.8

17.3

24.5

82.9

35.2

47.7

Forrest

280.2

221.1

159.6

61.5

37.4

22.7

14.7

21.7

12.0

9.7

Franklin

768.7

606.4

307.8

298.6

45.9

15.6

30.3

116.4

54.6

61.8

George

430.2

299.2

202.3

96.9

87.9

42.8

45.1

43.1

18.4

24.7

Greene

545.7

377.1

252.9

124.2

89.3

50.3

39.0

79.3

38.4

40.9

Grenada

154.2

51.3

30.4

20.9

52.0

29.8

22.2

50.9

18.3

32.6

Hancock

220.8

166.4

125.6

40.8

49.6

36.6

13.0

4.8

4.8

Harrison

422.1

352.5

274.0

78.5

63.8

31.0

32.8

5.8

4.1

1.7

Hinds

258.3

63.4

39.3

24.1

78.0

48.7

29.3

116.9

48.6

68.3

Holmes

275.6

78.2

64.0

14.2

90.1

20.3

69.8

107.3

49.3

58.0

Humphreys

110.6

...

16.2

5.0

11.2

94.4

24.1

70.3

Issaquena

308.5

16.2

1.3

14.9

69.5

6.7

62.8

222.8

45.7

177.1

Itawamba

192.3

40.3

36.5

3.8

77.6

34.1

43.5

74.4

37.2

37.2

Jackson

623.5

349.8

274.6

75.2

218.8

67.4

151.4

54.9

18.4

36.5

Jasper

755.5

512.2

280.4

231.8

147.0

57.7

89.3

96.3

44.4

51.9

Jefferson

717.7

521.2

212.8

308.4

102.0

40.4

61.6

94.5

25.2

69.3

Jefferson Davis

177.3

79.3

48.4

30.9

48.4

35.9

12.5

49.6

24.6

25.0

Jones

367.2

260.6

156.1

104.5

33.6

29.6

4.0

73.0

47.7

25.3

Kemper

380.2

255.6

160.5

95.1

58.7

47.3

11.4

65.9

35.4

30.5

Lafayette

430.5

162.8

125.0

37.8

61.7

25.2

36.5

206.0

65.1

140.9

Lamar

388.8

318.4

235.4

83.0

52.4

30.2

22.2

18.0

7.2

10.8

Lauderdale

454.2

323.7

274.4

49.3

49.0

34.2

14.8

81.5

54.9

26.6

Lawrence

295.9

144.4

102.8

41.6

34.8

26.0

8.8

116.7

44.4

72.3

Leake

234.8

155.3

99.5

55.8

33.6

27.6

6.0

45.9

19.4

26.5

Lee

51.5

24.3

7.5

16.8

3.0

3.0

24.2

11.8

12.4

Leflore

80.0

21.3

3.3

18.0

58.7

15.3

43.4

46

Table 5. Sawtimber volume by diameter group and county (Continued)

County

All

species

Softwood

Soft hardwood

Hard hardwood

Total

10-14

inches

16 inches and up

Total

12-14

inches

16 inches and up

Total

12-14

inches

16 inches and up

Million board jeet

Lincoln

418.5

245.8

115.8

130.0

70.0

45.0

25.0

102.7

42.2

60.5

Lowndes

128.5

47.6

21.8

25.8

31.4

19.4

12.0

49.5

29.4

20.1

Madison

268.5

112.9

69.0

43.9

51.7

11.0

40.7

103.9

52.1

51.8

Marion

474.7

271.2

170.6

100.6

86.7

50.4

36.3

116.8

48.1

68.7

Marshall

257.2

49.1

31.3

17.8

88.2

41.6

46.6

119.9

49.1

70.8

Monroe

185.8

85.3

36.2

49.1

29.1

21.9

7.2

71.4

48.2

23.2

Montgomery

96.4

48.5

27.7

20.8

4.1

4.1

43.8

25.4

18.4

Neshoba

471.2

220.2

184.4

35.8

120.5

83.9

36.6

130.5

66.6

63.9

Newton

245.7

100.2

81.0

19.2

44.4

29.5

14.9

101.1

36.2

64.9

Noxubee

342.7

233.0

155.3

77.7

9.3

9.3

100.4

60.6

39.8

Oktibbeha

162.0

117.0

64.4

52.6

2.5

2.5

42.5

15.2

27.3

Panola

89.5

1.0

1.0

31.9

10.8

21.1

56.6

21.5

35.1

Pearl River

556.2

412.6

341.0

71.6

117.9

60.2

57.7

25.7

6.0

19.7

Perry

565.6

482.7

286.9

195.8

43.3

30.4

12.9

39.6

24.3

15.3

Pike

242.6

86.4

56.8

29.6

56.2

14.8

41.4

100.0

37.4

62.6

Pontotoc

101.3

53.8

48.4

5.4

6.9

6.9

40.6

24.3

16.3

Prentiss

53.6

11.7

10.8

.9

10.4

10.4

31.5

17.6

13.9

Quitman

77.4

11.5

11.5

36.2

11.3

24.9

29.7

13.3

16.4

Rankin

597.7

314.2

191.7

122.5

51.1

17.0

34.1

232.4

103.1

129.3

Scott

471.4

369.8

217.6

152.2

49.2

39.7

9.5

52.4

34.2

18.2

Sharkey

167.8

11.7

11.7

33.9

11.3

22.6

122.2

24.2

98.0

Simpson

312.1

182.5

108.9

73.6

51.0

35.1

15.9

78.6

53.1

25.5

Smith

347.7

270.4

182.5

87.9

33.9

20.2

13.7

43.4

22.8

20.6

Stone

360.6

265.9

173.5

92.4

71.7

48.6

23.1

23.0

11.9

11.1

Sunflower

26.1

15.1

2.3

12.8

2.2

2.2

8.8

4.8

4.0

Tallahatchie

145.7

28.7

25.7

3.0

38.1

20.3

17.8

78.9

16.9

62.0

Tate

80.3

48.4

22.8

25.6

31.9

18.5

13.4

Tippah

105.9

27.4

27.4

23.6

5.1

18.5

54.9

28.3

26.6

Tishomingo

263.1

138.5

102.7

35.8

54.8

31.4

23.4

69.8

37.8

32.0

Tunica

252.5

14.3

3.7

10.6

145.4

39.7

105.7

92.8

18.7

74.1

Union

145.4

57.3

57.3

42.0

31.2

10.8

46.1

23.8

22.3

Walthall

156.3

72.1

38.5

33.6

68.7

47.4

21.3

15.5

5.4

10.1

Warren

597.3

30.7

4.3

26.4

286.6

76.6

210.0

280.0

79.2

200.8

Washington

206.8

2.5

.9

1.6

109.5

26.0

83.5

94.8

19.7

75.1

Wayne

732.5

598.2

420.0

178.2

59.5

40.6

18.9

74.8

42.7

32.1

Webster

99.3

63.1

52.0

11.1

8.8

4.1

4.7

27.4

15.2

12.2

Wilkinson

869.1

588.1

264.3

323.8

78.5

38.6

39.9

202.5

53.4

149.1

Winston

524.2

261.3

181.3

80.0

111.1

48.9

62.2

151.8

87.4

64.4

Yalobusha

107.1

32.9

14.9

18.0

10.0

6.5

3.5

64.2

36.3

27.9

Yazoo

409.0

17.7

5.3

12.4

116.3

31.4

84.9

275.0

66.6,

208,4.

Total 25,546.7

13,537.4

8,402.4

5,135.0

5,052.8

2,300.8

2,752.0

6,956.5

2,895.8

4,060.7

47

Table 6. Land area and commercial forest by county

County

All land

Adams

Thousand

acres

286.7

Alcorn

259.2

Amite

466.6

Attala

463.4

Benton

263.7

Bolivar

586.9

Calhoun

369.2

Carroll

408.3

Chickasaw

323.8

Choctaw

266.9

Claiborne

311.0

Clarke

446.1

Clay

265.0

Coahoma

364.8

Copiah

499.9

Covington

266.2

De Soto

283.5

Forrest

300.2

Franklin

363.5

George

307.8

Greene

465.9

Grenada

251.0

Hancock

310.4

Harrison

374.4

Hinds

561.3

Holmes

489.0

Humphreys

262.4

Issaquena

265.6

Itawamba

346.2

Jackson

476.2

Jasper

437.1

Jefferson

332.8

Jefferson Davis

265.0

Jones

451.8

Kemper

484.5

Lafayette

387.8

Lamar

320.0

Lauderdale

461.4

Lawrence

277.1

Leake

375.0

Lee

291.2

Leflore

376.3

Commercial forest

Thousand

acres

Percent

216.8

75.6

134.3

51.8

304.2

65.2

276.4

59.6

174.7

66.2

107.7

18.4

209.1

56.6

213.5

52.3

150.4

46.4

185.6

69.5

223.5

71.9

332.5

74.5

121.0

45.7

94.1

25.8

338.4

67.7

149.1

56.0

74.7

26.3

210.4

70.1

288.2

79.3

251.5

81.7

390.4

83.8

165.8

66.1

249.3

80.3

285.4

76.2

241.9

43.1

222.9

45.6

101.0

38.5

160.7

60.5

226.7

65.5

380.2

79.8

288.1

65.9

231.4

69.5

145.2

54.8

300.5

66.5

332.3

68.6

236.3

60.9

248.3

77.6

329.9

71.5

192.0

69.3

224.4

59.8

88.4

30.4

94.3

25.1

County

All land

Commercial forest

Thousand

Thousand

acres

acres

Percent

Lincoln

375.0

234.4

62.5

Lowndes

325.1

144.4

44.4

Madison

480.6

197.6

41.1

Marion

352.0

239.4

68.0

Marshall

443.6

184.7

41.6

Monroe

492.2

264.7

53.8

Montgomery

257.9

154.0

59.7

Neshoba

363.5

199.6

54.9

Newton

371.2

226.1

60.9

Noxubee

444.8

214.4

48.2

Oktibbeha

290.6

150.8

51.9

Panola

436.5

135.3

31.0

Pearl River

530.0

348.7

65.8

Perry

417.9

327.6

78.4

Pike

262.4

142.0

54.1

Pontotoc

320.6

143.1

44.6

Prentiss

267.5

137.0

51.2

Quitman

263.7

64.3

24.4

Rankin

512.0

359.9

70.3

Scott

393.6

253.8

64.5

Sharkey

279.0

132.1

47.3

Simpson

375.7

252.8

67.3

Smith

410.9

258.0

62.8

Stone

286.7

247.2

86.2

Sunflower

443.5

49.3

11.1

Tallahatchie

412.2

150.7

36.6

Tate

245.1

68.7

28.0

Tippah

297 0

162.4

54.7

Tishomingo

288.6

195.2

67.6

Tunica

293.1

91.4

31.2

Union

270.1

122.5

45.4

Walthall

257.9

133.6

51.8

Warren

362.2

233.2

64.4

Washington

465.9

108.3

23.2

Wayne

529.3

434.6

82.1

Webster

266.2

176.5

66.3

Wilkinson

432.0

328.3

76.0

Winston

387.8

244.2

63.0

Yalobusha

282.9

184.2

65.1

Yazoo

600.4

307.1

51.1

All counties

30,152.3

17,193.6

57.0

48

1022378477