RIG AN BREE: OF POULTRY PtATt t nutrition Llv THE AMERICAN BREEDS OF POULTRY THEIR ORIGIN, HISTORY OF THEIR DEVELOP- MENT, THE WORK OF CONSTRUCTIVE BREEDERS AND HOW TO MATE EACH OF THE VARIETIES FOR BEST RESULTS BY FRANK L. PLATT PUBLISHED BY AMERICAN POULTRY JOURNAL CHICAGO, ILLINOIS Ocx- COPYRIGHT, 1921 BY JAS. W. BELL & Co CHICAGO, ILL. Mr m I^b. -> 8 6 Wyamlotte ZYi 6J4 7^/2 534 Rhode Island Red 8J/2 6'A 7X 5 Buckeye 9 (»Vi 8 sx Java Dominique 9 J4 7 7r/> 5 8 6 6 1/- 4 Taking the birds as they run, it will be found that the Rocks are the largest of the six breeds which comprise the class, and when bred somewhat for meat production the}- meet the most critical demand for roasting or large type fowls. The Wyandotte made its early reputation as a broiler rather than a roasting chicken. It reaches the two-pound stage quickly, in a plump condition and better covered with plumage than the Rock. The Wyandotte makes a plump and nicely fleshed, well proportioned capon at weights of from seven to nine pounds. The Rhode Island Red originally was colony farmed for eggs in the Little (Jompton district of Rhode Island, and the uniformity of size found in the Reds at the present time is the direct result of selective breeding since fanciers have taken up the breed. Popular favor has been extended to even a larger type of Red than what the American Poultry Association has set as standard, and a six-pound pullet usually will win over a Standard five-pound pullet, other points being equal. The Red therefore may be said to have valuable meat quality. D. O. Barto, in charge of poultry at the Illinois Agricultural Station, states that three out of five of his best capons are Reds. Each of these breeds has strong vitality, and this is an important matter, because there cannot be high fertility in the eggs, good "livability" of the chicks, sturdy growth, fleshing qualities, or high egg production without strong constitutional vigor. 20 THE AMERICAN BREEDS OF POULTRY Specially selected meat type. In the development of a strictly meat type, the Plymouth Rocks generally are considered as possessing the rather greater possibilities. The Plymouth Rocks have competed with the most formidable of the Asiatic sub-breeds, namely, the Light Brahmas, and in the great poultry growing section of eastern Massa- chusetts the Rock has displaced the Brahma on some farms, and on some others the two are crossbred to make the finest capons and soft roasters. It should be said, however, that pure Barred and White Rocks are extensively used down the shore south of Boston, where the famous South Shore roasters are grown. These roasting chickens consist both of caponized cockerels and fat pullets. It is one of the few places in the world where pullets are grown for their meat. The general run of South Shore roasters weigh from eight to nine pounds for males and from five and one-half to six pounds for females. Not infrequently heavier weights are obtained. The writer has han- dled a pair of South Shore White Rock capons that weighed twenty- two pounds four ounces and were said to be nine months old. There is no opportunity for milk-feeding establishments in a district like this where the birds are "grown fat." As the fowls are not finished by being confined and crate-fed, their meat is relatively firm, yet a certain softness results from the rapid growth. J. H. Curtiss, of Assinippi, Massachusetts, who has been called the "father of the South Shore," being credited with having started the industry there about 1880 by growing the best poultry that he could, has strongly recommended the White Plymouth Rock. Said he: "It produces a golden yellow leg, a golden yellow bill, and as high- colored meat as any fowl in the world." To show the size this variety attains and the satisfactory, quick growth that it makes, he took the carcass of a White Rock capon that had just come from the picking- room, put it on the scales, and it pulled eleven pounds four ounces. It was May 3, and the bird was a winter chicken eight months old, having been hatched September 1. Henry Dana Smith, of Norwell, Massachusetts, an extensive grower of roasting chickens, preferred the Barred variety. Commenting on the matter, he said: "The Barred Rock is now the best bird on the South Shore. I have found that on the same feed and with the same care the Barreds average one-half pound more than the Whites. Growing five thousand roasters a year, this half pound means twenty- five hundred pounds of high-priced soft roaster meat a year." Mr. Smith's near neighbor, Joseph Tolman, keeps White Rocks, and thus the matter of preference runs. Success with a certain kind depends more on the flock or strain than it does upon breed name. Plymouth Rocks on the South Shore which are most desirable as producers of roasting chickens are of Standard weight or slightly heavier. The Rocks of the midwest farms are largely grades, and while somewhat under Standard weight, as a rule they usually are A DUAL PURPOSE TYPE 21 in relatively good flesh, and if fed for about two weeks make excellent milk-fed poultry. Stations equipped with feeding batteries for approxi- mately twelve to twenty thousand or more fowls at a time are being established over the Middle West and some parts of the South. The feeders are critical of the type of fowls the farmers grow. They want the stock to possess good fleshing qualities, whether young or old. The American breeds are the favorite with them. Grading up the size of the farm stock through the use of purebred Plymouth Rock males. It is not exaggeration to say that the farm fowls of the country owe much of their size to the Barred Plymouth Rock. With a view to showing the breeding value of a purebred Plymouth Rock male when introduced into a flock of nondescript, Grade Barred Plymouth Rocks. Three generations removed from mongrels. This pair is the result of grading up through the use of Purebred Barred Plymouth Rock sires on the poultry farm of the U. S. Department of Agriculture. mongrel hens, an experiment was conducted on the Government Poultry F'rm at Beltsville, Maryland, by Harry M. Lamon, senior poultryman, United States Department of Agriculture, and Robert D. Slocum, assistant in charge. Some typical dunghill hens that had come from the farms of Maryland and Virginia were purchased in the Washington market. A Barred Plymouth Rock male was placed in the first pen. He was of Standard size and conformation. The pullets from him when full grown weighed 5.63 pounds each, or one pound six ounces more than their mongrel dams. The next year these grade pullets were also bred to a pure Barred Rock male, and this union produced pullets weighing an average of 6.22 pounds each. In other words, the use of purebred sires for two generations had brought the pullets up to. Standard weights, All weights were taken as of March 1, 22 THE AMERICAN BREEDS OF POULTRY A White Plymouth Rock male was used on the pen of mongrels that averaged 4.33 pounds. The first cross produced pullets that weighed 5.68 pounds each. , It is well known that they have fine coops on the government farm, and that, in addition to splendid housing and range, Uncle Sam is a good provider and his chickens have the best of feed, in the right proportion, and plenty of it. It was natural, therefore, to ask Mr. Slocum, who had charge of this breeding experiment, if the increase in weight was partly the result of the young stock of each cross being full fed; that is, given all the nourishing food required to make bone, muscle and feathers, or whether the increase in size from generation to generation was altogether clue to the birds growing bigger because it was within their nature to grow bigger as a result of the employ- ment of Plymouth Rock blood. Mr. Slocum replied: "I attribute this increase in weight entirely to the infusion of the Plymouth Rock blood. Work carried on with the use of mongrel males leads to this conclusion." Buyers of market poultry prefer the American breeds. The buyers of market poultry throughout the Middle West encourage the keep- ing of the American breeds because of the satisfactory size attained by the mature specimens. In some places a premium of two. three cr even four cents a pound is paid for hens that weigh from four to four and one-half pounds and up; in other words, hens that weigh less than four pounds bring two to four cents a pound less than the heavy sizes. In explanation of this price schedule, Stanley Wyckoff, president of the Indianapolis Poultry Company, writes: It is almost impossible to sell small sizes that dress out under four pounds, except at a loss, as the average family does not wish to buy a chicken under four pounds for a roast or stewing purposes ; and small sizes are neglected by hotel, cafe and dining-car trade, as they positively will not purchase any fowl under four and one-half pounds, and prefer five-pound stock, as it is more economical for slicing. The canning trade that puts up chicken soup will not use small fowl even at a discount, as they say it is not economical in comparison with the amount of meat that can be taken off, in comparing the .frame with larger sizes. When H. C. Pierce, now of the United States Foo«" Research Laboratory, was working for his master's degree at Cornell, 1907, he made up a table showing the proportion of edible meat to the dressed weight, and the breeds made the following showing: Barred Plymouth Rock, 74 percent; White Wyandotte, 72 percent; Buff Orpington, 69 percent; White Leghorn, 66 percent. This means that one hundred pounds of Barred Plymouth Rocks carry eight pounds more edible meat than one hundred pounds of White Leghorns. It also is equivalent to saying that the buyer kills and dresses two three-pound hens to get four pounds of edible meat, whereas he kills and dresses one six-pound hen to get approximately four and one-half pounds of edible meat. The double cost of handling the small sizes adds materially to the operating expense. It there- A DUAL PURPOSE TYPE 23 fore follows that live poultry buyers and shippers are enthusiastic about maintaining the general purpose breeds at Standard weights. As egg producers. While breeders as a rule are partial to the breed of their choice, and on every occasion champion that breed with pardonable enthusiasm, it usually is conceded by authorities who have a broad view of the entire field of breeds that the Single Comb White Leghorn, taking all the specimens of the race as you find them on the commercial egg farms of New York, New Jersey, eastern Four of the high laying females in White Wyandottes, R. I. Reds, Barred Rocks and White Leghorns at the 1919 International Egg Laying competition, Connecticut Agricultural College. Pennsylvania and Connecticut, is the more fool-proof laying type and the somewhat more economical consumer of feed. However, when the American breeds are bred for egg production, that is, when an intelligent effort is made to regulate the type and tendencies of the progeny by carefully selecting the parent stock, hens and pullets of the American breeds may be depended upon to make a creditable showing in the egg-laying competitions, and it frequently does happen that a pen of these birds wins the championship prize. The records made by four breeds at the sixth egg-laying contest conducted at the Missouri Poultry Experiment Station, which covered * 1 A DUAL PURPOSE TYPE 25 a period of one year, November, 1916, to November, 1917, show the ability of highly egg-bred fowls of the American birds as layers along- side of the highly specialized Leghorn: All Rhode Island Reds averaged 188 eggs each. All Wyandottes averaged 184 eggs each. All Leghorns averaged 178 eggs each. All Plymouth Rocks averaged 175 eggs each. The silver cup for highest production went to a pen of White Wyandottes owned by J. F. Jordan, Missouri. This pen of five females laid 216, 245, 269, 273 and 213 eggs, respectively, a total of 1,226 eggs for the year, or an average egg production of 245 for each female in the pen, the highest average which had been made at the Missouri station up to that time.* At the Agricultural Experiment Station of Connecticut, where the widely advertised eastern competition known as the International Egg Laying Contest is held, the American breeds have made fine records from month to month, year after year. The report of the fifth annual contest (Bulletin 89, February, 1917) gives some interesting data on birds of different breeds, from which the following table is made up: Number of Hens Eggs per Bird Weight per Dozen, ounces Percent of Birds Broody Average Weight, pounds Feed Cost, Averaga Pen Plymouth Rocks . Wyandottes . . . R I Reds . . . . 170 170 210 160.4 169.6 158 7 26.4 23.5 24.4 44.4 57.6 65.6 5.97 5.12 5.73 $20.72 18.68 19.93 White Leghorns . Miscellaneous . . . 350 100 165.4 147.2 23.8 24.3 13.6 38.7 3.70 4.24 17.48 18.34 Four birds that made high records in the principal varieties at the contest (1919) are illustrated on page 23. The White Wyandotte in the upper left corner laid 238 eggs, and she was the high bird for all the Wyandottes. The Rhode Island Red, to the right, laid 258 eggs and was the high bird of this breed. The Barred Rock laid 235 eggs and was in the pen that won the contest. The White Leg- horn made a production of 213 eggs, having laid sixty-four days without a miss. (The highest White Leghorn record for the year was 260 eggs.) The high pen for 1919 was composed of ten Barred Rock pullets which laid 2,022 eggs, or an average of 202 eggs per bird. *These figures are taken from the official report of the station; however, if the egg yield of the five hens is added, it will be found that the total is 1,216 eggs instead of 1,226, as reported, and this error appears to be explicable only by the assumption that during the year ten eggs were laid on the floor of the house a.nd were not credited to any individual hen, 26 THE AMERICAN BREEDS OF POULTRY The best pen of White Leghorns finished the year with a record of 1,867 eggs. The records of the eight years since the inception of this contest show White Leghorns to have been the winners in 1912, 1913 and 1914, White Wyandottes in 1915 and 1916, Barred Rocks in 1917 and 1919, and Professor James Dryden's "Oregons" in 1918. It is fair to state, and it should be understood thoroughly by the beginner, that the specimens entered in egg contests are specially bred for eggs, selected for the competition because they develop into active, thrifty pullets, and these birds are then fed throughout the test on a ration that supplies in abundant quantity and proper pro- portions the complete food nutrients necessary to make complete eggs. Prepotent eggbred males to grade up the farm flock for egg pro- duction. There is a growing demand among farmers for purebred males that have "the lay" bred in them, to use in grading up their farm flocks. These males are wanted for the purpose of gearing up the egg-producing abilities of farm flocks, the same as Holstein bulls are used to grade up the milk-giving capacity of farm cattle. The whole tendency is toward higher average production of the animals on the farms. Increased land values on which interest must be earned, increased wages and scarcity of help to care for the livestock, in- creased value of grain that is fed, increased selling prices for animal products, all combine to make it increasingly plain to the farmer that two efficient animals are more economical to own, care for and feed than three inefficient ones. It is sound policy for the farmer to grade up his flock for egg production by employing purebred males of high producing strains. The practice of grading in cattle and hogs is becoming general and is recognized by all livestock men as the cheapest and quickest way of making improvement. Grading up the farm flock of chickens through the purchase and introduction of Standardbred males will broaden the outlet for good poultry. The time was when there had to be a White Wyandotte fancy if there was to be trade in White Wyandottes, for breeders could only sell their surplus stock and eggs to other breeders. The same was true of Barred Rocks, Golden Polish and Silver Sebrights. However, the tima has come to put the utility breeds to their greatest usefulness by getting them out more and more into the hands of the people who actually are producing the eggs and poultry for human consumption. The opportunity is here for purebred poultry on the farms to justify itself from an economic standpoint. There is no basic reason for the existence and extension of purebred poultry in preference to scrubs, unless purebred stock represents a more depend- ably useful and more truly valuable type of fowl. In 1912 the Kansas Agricultural College asked the question: "Will cockerels from high producing families of various practical breeds improve farmers' flocks quickly and effectively?" Experiments were begun with a view to getting a definite answer to the question. Ten A DUAL PURPOSE TYPE 2; mongrel pullets that had come from Kansas farms were mated to an eggbred Barred Plymouth Rock male. His dam had a record of 232 eggs. The egg production of the mongrels was 98 eggs; of their grade pullets, 132 eggs. These grade pullets were now mated to another purebred Barred Plymouth Rock male whose dam was the same 232-egg hen. The pullets resulting from this second infusion of pure- bred blood laid 150 eggs. These pullets were in turn mated to a Barred Rock male of eggbred stock but without pedigree, and the pullets so produced averaged 156 eggs each. In this last lot of pullets one laid 248, one 250 and one 260 eggs within the year. In commenting on the experiments at the Kansas station to increase egg production by breeding, Professor William A. Lippin- cott says: Systematic breeding for egg production is still in its infancy. Desirable cockerels from the production standpoint undoubtedly are more numerous now than when this investigation was begun, and are becoming more numerous each year. But record- keeping breeders are still too few, and unscrupulous promoters who advertise 200-egg strains, without even using trapnests, are, unfortunately, too many. Purebred birds for egg production. The breeder who wishes to specialize in egg production ordinarily will reach his goal much more quickly by breeding within the breed, that is, by making selections within a purebred flock rather than by crossing breeds. Professor James Dryden, after a quarter of a century of poultry experience, recently has succeeded in making a cross which he has called "Oregons," and these birds have come into^ the limelight by making splendid egg records not only at the Oregon Agricultural College, where they were originated, but also in the Connecticut and Missouri egg contests, although they have not proved superior to the estab- lished breeds. The breeder who stays within a breed will find that he has the benefit of established breed character and does not have to contend with a diversity of new and troublesome factors that not uncommonly arise when breeds are crossed. Moreover, late reports indicate that there is no particular permanency to the value of the "Oregons" as egg producers. At the International Contest starting November 1, 1919, and covering the six winter months up to May 7, 1920, two pens of Barred Rocks, two of Rhode Island Reds, one of Rhode Island Whites, and two pens of White Leghorns each laid over one thousand eggs, or an average of one hundred eggs per bird during the six months, while a pen of ten "Oregons" laid 711 eggs. There are those who believe that all flocks or strains should be developed along the line of pronounced egg-laying propensities. This would amount to these strains of specialized fowls practically absorb- ing the breed. While the author earnestly subscribes to the recom- mendation that more and more thought should be given by fanciers to the potential egg-laying capabilities of their fowls, he believes that specialized strains for egg production should be developed within the breed and that they should not absorb the breed. We must not lose 28 THE AMERICAN BREEDS OF POULTRY sight of the two-purpose type in our American breeds. It is yet to be demonstrated that the very best meat and egg qualities can be developed in the same individual, and until it shall have been proved that the one temperament does not strive against the other, and that the 280-egg hen not only produces Standardweight pullets but gets cockerels that at the proper age will dress off as large, well meated capons, it is inadvisable to put emphasis on one quality alone, to the exclusion of the other, in so far as the breed as a whole is concerned. Effect of heavy laying on breeding power. Poultry breeders as a class have been criticized for not establishing production records as have the breeders of dairy cattle. The hen usually is associated with the dairy cow, both being producers. However, in arguing the validity of his position in not going in for high records in all his breeding females, the practical poultry. fancier may point out a differ- ence between the hen and the cow. The cow bears her young alive, while the hen lays an egg from which the young is hatched outside her body. The egg contains some sustenance in the form of yolk, which is absorbed into the intestines just before the chick is hatched and serves as the young's first food; but the 'egg also contains all the material necessary to make the chick — its blood, muscles, cartilage that later will Harden into bone, scales on its shanks, down on its body, etc. When you breed to increase milk production you breed to increase the sustenance that the mother is to supply to her young; when you breed to increase egg production you breed to increase the vital process of reproduction. It seems true that a hen may lay in excess of her own strength, in which case she is unable to impart to her pullets that vitality which is necessary if they are to equal the egg record of their dam. It is on this ground that some practical breeders maintain that what may be termed a high normal layer is the surer breeder. There is a diversity of opinion on this matter, and data on experi- mental breeding at the federal and state experiment stations are not yet sufficient to influence the majority of fanciers. Thomas E. Quisen- berry, founder of the American School of Poultry Husbandry, and for a time in charge of the work at the Missouri Poultry Experiment Station, writes: We had at the station one hen which laid 286 eggs, and we incubated every one of them and were able to hatch only one chick, and that was a pullet. This pullet since that time has not laid enough eggs to half way pay her feed bill. I believe laying will in most cases affect the vitality of a hen to such an extent that the chicks are liable to be weak, but this is not always the case. I have found a good many hens that were able to lay between 250 and 300 eggs, and the greater percent- age were fertile and many of them hatched strong, healthy chicks. My contention is that when a breeder finds such a hen he should keep her and endeavor to build up a strain or family of such producers. Harry R. Lewis, professor of poultry husbandry, New Jersey Agricultural College, handles the subject in a conclusive, way and A DUAL PURPOSE TYPE 29 definitely states that high egg production is not carried on at the expense of breeding power. He writes: We have no evidence to show that heavy egg production in a normal, healthy bird will exhaust her strength and vitality. There are, of course, many hens that fail to stand up under production, but invariably we find their failure is due to a general lack of vitality and inherent vigor. We have made a careful study of fertility and hatchability as correlated to egg production, and we find absolutely no relation between heavy and poor fertility and low hatchability. In other words, we find just as much poor fertility and low hatchability from low producers as from high pro- ducers. We quite frequently find that pullets from high producing hens do not produce nearly as well as their dams, which, of course, is just what we expect through the influence of Mendelian segregation of characters in the progeny. In other words, if a hen and the male to which she is mated are high for production, we conse- quently get pullets, all of which are high producers. On the other hand, if they are impure for high production — or, expressed another way, impure for winter produc- tion— we get progeny representing various degrees of production. The method of inheritance of fecundity, or the laying tendency, is discussed in Chapter III. Farm Flock of Purebred Barred Plymouth Rocks. On the farms. The type that makes good as a farm fowl is the dual type. While in especially bred strains of the American breeds either egg or meat values may be developed to a point where the stock is comparable with that of highly specialized breeds, in the last analysis it will be found that it is a satisfactory combination of the two prooerties as found in the American breeds that makes them a well balanced type for general purposes. There are those who will 30 THE AMERICAN BREEDS OF POULTRY say that they are interested not primarily but first and last in eggs. The farmer, however, who takes up a highly specialized egg breed may not long keep it pure, because of its inferior size. He is prone to cross large males on such stock, that he may get as much potential capacity for size as possible in each chick that is hatched. Therefore it is not safe to assume that the type which possesses table quality will fall into disregard and be succeeded by any other fowl. To determine the present and future place of the American breeds, our facts must be sufficiently diversified and the scope of our vision sufficiently extensive to enable us to understand the requirements of those who have adopted this type and to see something of the con- ditions under which their fowls are grown. This means that we consider the economic aspects of the poultry industry and note the place that American breeds occupy in the permanent agriculture of the country. The popularity of the dual type is rooted in the best systems ot general farming. Under such conditions a diversity of crops are produced, and poultry is a relatively minor enterprise on the farm. Approximately ninety-five percent of the poultry and eggs that enter trade channels and are consumed as foe 1 by the population, are pro- duced on the general farms of the country. A great deal is written about intensive poultry farms where eggs or poultry meat is almost a single product, but, after all, the gross production of all these plants is a small item in the market. The north central geographical district, for example, comprising the twelve states of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, Kansas, Nebraska, North and South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin and Michigan, report, according to the 1910 census, 54.3 percent of all the fowls in the United States, and 52.7 percent of the entire annual egg production. In other words, of the 280,345,133 chickens on the farms of the United States, 144,664,064, or more than half are to be found in the upper Mississippi Valley; and on these same broad acres is to be found the range from which the hens glean a large part of the food for their yield of 784,804,653 dozens of eggs, or more than half of the country's annual production of 1,457,385,772 dozens. These twelve states, containing about one-third of the population and producing one-half of the poultry products, furnish an excess to be consumed in sections like the middle Atlantic and New England states, which, with 28 percent of the population, produce 13.5 percent of the eggs. Illinois alone produces about one hundred million dozens of eggs a year, and of this number there were shipped in the months of March, April, May and June, 1918, to the four great consuming centers of Chicago, Boston, New York and Philadelphia, 1,017,712 cases of eggs, each case containing thirty dozen. This is farm poultry pro- duction. Each of the states of Ohio, Iowa and Missouri also produce approximately one hundred million dozens annually. Dual purpose type fits into general farming. Poultry culture on A DUAL PURPOSE TYPE 31 the farms is not a specialized business. The growing fowls get some food that has a marketable value, to be sure, but they also consume a large amount that otherwise would be waste; and some of the care and attention bestowed upon them would otherwise be unpaid labor. As an example of farm poultry culture, the case may be cited of Mrs. Homer Caton, McLean County, Illinois, who reported 1,224 eggs from sixty-four White Plymouth Rocks in the 'month of April, 1919. The birds were on the range 'of a general farm where some cattle were kept, and the chickens were not fed except during the winter months. Compared to where the pojultry operations have been intensified to the point of a one-product: plant, there is in the case of farm poultrykeeping more of what would be waste feed and unremunerated labor and there is less capital, invested in buildings and equipment. On the general farm there may be a four-horsepower engine that c^n be used to grind alfalfa for the poultry mash or to crush grain; there may be screenings after the seed wheat is fanned; there may be straw to use in the scratch shed. In other words, on a diversified farm the poultry enterprise links up with other departments. More- over, the poultry and livestock in general are linked up with the growing of crops; there is a balance existing between the feed that is grown and the animals that are kept; in feeding animals, the farmer is not dependent on feed shipped from a distance, but has the advan- tage of feed at farmers' prices. The farmer finds that the large type of fowl makes the more profit- able use of the feed and conditions under which it is grown and maintained; its tendency to size provides more potential "raw mate- rial" in each chick that is hatched; and if there is good egg-laying power combined with the liberal size, the type is bound to be popular with him. This is in line with the well established policy among farmers to select the larger dairy animals within the breed. The most widely distributed dairy breed, the Holstein, as bred in its native country, Holland, is reputed to produce the best veal to be secured on the Continent; and the breed has won its reputation in America partly because of its value in terms of meat when ultimately it reaches the block. The milking Shorthorn today is enjoying the greatest popularity that it has enjoyed in a generation, and the increased demand for such dual purpose cows is a demand for more efficient animals to convert into meat and milk what the economist calls waste feed and unproductive labor. The future for the dual purpose type. We may expect to see more hens and more dairy cows kept as population increases. The secre- tary of agriculture has stated that we should count on an increase in the population of the United States of one million a year for the next decade. Increased population inevitably means more labor and propor- tionately less land. Following this condition, in the older countries of Europe, chickens and dual purpose cattle have maintained themselves 32 THE AMERICAN BREEDS OF POULTRY A Nine-Wedk-Old Rhode Island Red Chick, Well Developed For Its Age. and increased with the popu- lation at the expense of other classes of livestock. Beef ani- mals alone cannot subsist and increase in numbers when an increasing population inevi- tably requires that from year to year the products of the land be more and more in- tensively produced. This, of course, is a view into the future. At present a large part of the farm crops are produced especially as a food for ani- mals. Of the corn grown, over ninety percent is fed to ani- mals, and they consume all of the stover, for corn is pri- marily a food for animals; they consume seventy per- cent of the oats, and thirty percent of the wheat returns to the farms as bran and middlings. The pasture and hay crops are much larger than the cereal crops, and animals alone afford a means of marketing them. Livestock, therefore, follows crop production as a natural sequence. It takes about one hundred pounds of feed to produce twenty pounds of meat, regardless of the kind of animal. Meat is a high form of nourishment for human consumption. While a great wealth of plant products is directly available to man, both in abundant quan- tity and appetizing form, the fact is that half his diet consists of foods of animal origin. The United States Bureau of Labor statistics show that in the city of Toledo, Ohio, for instance, during the year ended March 31, 1918, the average family of the 207 families investi- gated in the shipbuilding district where data were collected, spent $605.17 for food, of which $303.24 was for meat products, excluding fish. Economical producers. Animals such as cattle, hogs and hens bear an intermediate relation between plants and man, and foods of animal origin are more costly and valuable than foods of vegetable origin, because the production of the former involves the use of the latter. Therefore, the economy with which animals produce is of ever great importance. The hen and the cow are entitled to first position in the ranks as economical producers. Unlike beef cattle or hogs, they are not designed especially as a laboratory to convert fields of corn or acres of grass into a marketable product, beef and pork, by which A DUAL PURPOSE TYPE 33 the farmer can market his labor and crop in a condensed form; the hen and the cow are wise provisions of nature to utilize and trans- form much of what would be unmarketable grain and pasture into a high form of nourishment, eggs and milk, and then render up their carcasses for food. In addition to that economy which makes dairy cattle and chickens a part of permanent agriculture, the products of these animals are particularly valuable because they are well balanced foods. The price of meat cannot be compared to the price of eggs, because they are dissimilar products, meat being defective in ash and low in vitamines. Eggs have satisfactory proteins and, like milk, are satis- factory in ash or minerals, also in vitamines, which are necessary to growth and health. In cooking, there is no substitute for an egg any more than there is a substitute for wheat. The chemical analysis of another grain may show as many calories, but if the gluten is not of the same kind, it makes a crumbly bread instead of a light bread. The albumen of the egg serves about the same purpose in cooking. Thus, taking it all in all, considering the place of the hen on the farm and the value of her product, it is evident that chickens are in a class by themselves, and no one can fairly doubt of the future. Demand for poultry products. It is not necessary to urge the farmers of the country to take up poultrykeeping. They already have poultry, they know something of its possibilities, and they are becom- ing more and more interested in better stock and better methods, for they perceive the dawn of a new opportunity which is based on a new price level for poultry and eggs, and a demand so wide that the products are always staple. It is interesting to contemplate how enormously poultry produc- tion can be expanded by these country producers, not as a result of more labor and a materially increased cost of maintenance, but by employing sound stock and giving the birds more thoughtful care. Missouri furnishes an example of what grading the hens and intelli- gently directed effort on the part of the caretaker will accomplish. According to the census, the farm hens of Missouri lay an average of sixty-four eggs a year. The State Agricultural College at Columbia sent a man out into the state to arrange with some Missouri farmers to put into practice such recommendations as the college could offer on poultrykeeping, and the recommendations were put into practice and the work carried through on twenty-four farms in thirteen coun- ties. The average egg yield on those farms was a fraction over one hundred eggs per hen for the year, or three dozen more than the state-wide average. What does this mean? If the farm hens of Missouri could be made to lay only one more egg per hen per year, and that egg could be sold in December at five cents, there would be an increased return of one million dollars to farmers of the state. Successful poultrykeeping is not limited to the more fertile and rich sections. It is, in fact, of relatively more importance in the 34 THE AMERICAN BREEDS OF POULTRY poorer sections: than on the rich brown-silt loam of the corn belt. A grain crop failure does not seriously hamper poultry operations, which would be the case if larger quantities of feed were required as for beef cattle, hogs, etc. Poultry is one of the things with which the people in the poorer sections can do well. There are counties in southern Illinois where the receipts from the sale of poultry and eggs per acre of cultivated ground are three times what they are per culti- vated acre in some of the rich northern counties. The farm management office of the United States Department of Agriculture made a five-year survey on twenty-five southeastern Ohio hill farms and found that the receipts from the sale of poultry and eggs formed the second largest source of income on those farms, amounting to more than the receipts from any other source except cattle. It is interesting to note in this connection that the farms keeping from 200 to 330 hens reported 16 percent more net profit per hen than those keeping 60 to 100 hens. Undoubtedly, this greater income from the larger flocks is to be accounted for on the ground that where the poultry enterprise was developed, more attention natu- rally was directed to the facilities of housing, proper feed and care, as well as to the quality of stock kept. When a man realizes the importance of good care, he begins to want good stock on which to bestow his care and attention. It is so with a man whom we met recently. He had wintered eighty-six Rhode Island Red hens and in the month of January had sold $53.66 worth of eggs from those hens. He had purchased two males at $5 each to head his flock and was so pleased with them that he asked the writer to buy four females for about $20 to mate to one of the cockerels. He wanted something better than he had. On another farm in Vermilion County, Illinois, where 250 Rhode Island Red females were wintered, there were sold an average of $21 worth of eggs per week throughout the months of December, January and February, 1918-1919. It was the first time that this owner ever had given attention to the chickens. It was easy for him to invest $76 in good quality males from two of the best breeders in the Middle West for the breeding season of 1919. High prices for purebred animals. A new era, distinguished by broader opportunities for the breeder of Standardbred poultry, is being ushered in. That means that the best blood is to be put to its greatest use, and no breeder who sees the vision and whose aims are focused on the good that the established American breeds can be made to do, and who therefore is reproducing his flock along the lines of Standard type, breed characteristics, stamina and general productiveness, need fear for his future. The farmer needs more dependable poultry of this type. It is the function of the breeder to produce for him the animal machine of the right size and type to do his work economically; the farmer's function is then to employ profitably this animal machine in A DUAL PURPOSE TYPE 35 the conversion of his raw material, of feed, into a finished product, of meat and eggs. Nature covers his farm with plants, both grass and cereals, which are nourished by earth, air and water. They take the inorganic materials and elaborate them into a living structure which serves as food for his animals. Thus the farmer is essentially a crop grower and feeder of livestock, not particularly a breeder, and it is plain that he must look to the constructive breeder for the efficient animals that can meet his requirements and produce economically the maximum of what the market requires. He is buying that kind of livestock, with the result that purebred cattle and swine are selling at higher prices and are in greater demand than ever before. He is buying purebred stock because it alone may be depended upon to possess linebred and established uniformity and usefulness. This explains the top prices at the sales we read about. It accounts for the public sale of fifty Duroc-Jersey hogs by a breeder in Nebraska at an average of $1,021 each, followed in the same season (1919) by a breeder in Ohio who gathers together fifty-four speci- mens which auction at an average of $1,018 each. In the season of 1918-1919, as reported by the Duroc-Jersey Bulletin, there were 175 sales of Durocs at which 7,729 animals were sold at an average of $208 each. This against 6,950 head sold in 1917-1918 at an average price of $153.88. We notice the same widespread appreciation of purebred cattle. For example, 242 Shorthorn cattle were sold in 1916 for $1,000 or more; 543 were transferred in 1917 at $1,000 or over, and in the first six months of 1918 there were 840 Shorthorns that sold for $1,000 or more. From $50 to $200 frequently is paid for a choice male of the American breeds, and not uncommonly such a sire heads a pen from which $200 to $1,000 worth of stock and eggs-for-hatching are sold. While these sales usually are to other breeders, they in turn sell to their trade, and thus sooner or later the best blood is diffused into the average flocks of the country. Therefore the last analysis shows that the traffic in Standardbred poultry, as in other purebred stock, is based fundamentally on the economic value of the improved races. If it were otherwise there would be no lasting foundation to the purebred business. Measuring up to the opportunity. The future in Standardbred poultry is for men who can breed good quality, who can organize a business, who themselves can grow bigger with the passing years. How big are you? How big are your plans? What are you aims this year? What is your goal line as chalked on the field of endeavor for ten years hence? Let us sit down and take stock of ourselves, measure our resources, look into the future, and see if our pathway leads to a destination that will be distinguished by the fruits of success. Let us see if we cannot reflect the greatness of the poultry 36 THE AMERICAN BREEDS OF POULTRY industry in our own poultry business and make that business of ours amount to something in the estimation of our town banker. For whom do you plan to grow fine fowl? A back-lot fancier? If so, that type of purchaser will influence the ends for which you bred and the kind of business which you develop. Are you growing seed stock for a great animal industry composed of poultry raisers who are ever dependent on the constructive effort of poultry breeders for new stock and new blood to reinforce their flocks? Then you will not grow your birds soft, you will not be satisfied to grow just a few of them, but you will seek to develop a type that will prove highly useful in the hands of men and women working under average conditions, and you will seek to multiply your supply of such stock to meet the demand. We do not need greater opportunity in poultry. What we stand in need of today is larger vision. There are nearly six million farm flocks in the United States. There are perhaps as many more back- lot ooultrykeepers. CHAPTER III THE BREEDER— HIS PLACE AND HIS WORK The place of the breeder — The qualifications of a breeder — The poultry show — Appreciating the quality of a specimen — The work of the breeder — Prepotency — Principles of breeding — Values that command good prices Having established the place that the American breeds occupy in the general scheme of economic agriculture, we shall be able to point out clearly just what position the purebred breeder of these breeds occupies in relation to the poultry industry as a whole. The poultry- man who is a breeder has a definite place to fill, a definite service to render, and it is important that he should understand precisely his status, that he may completely assume the responsibility which he bears to the industry and fully enjoy the opportunities which that position affords. The place of the breeder. The true function of the poultry breeder is to maintain a breeding establishment from which may be supplied seed stock in the form of breeding birds, eggs for hatching, or chicks. Roughly, poultrykeeping may be grouped under four heads: the breeder, the farmer, the commercial poultryman, the back-lotter. The business of the breeder is the maintenance of a supply to which all the members of the other three classes may go for foundation stock or blood to reinforce their flocks. From such a source flow the rivulets of good size, type, breed character and stamina that are to be absorbed by the poultry of the country. While nearly everyone who keeps poultry is somewhat interested in the problems of breeding, the relative few become constructive breeders. The majority remain mere multipliers, and their poultry is continuously running out, not because it is inbred, as they may avow, but because too many poor individuals are allowed to reproduce themselves. The great majority, therefore, are dependent upon the constructive efforts of the breeders. It is not generally understood that the breeder has made a real contribution. Some folks seemingly take for granted that the breeds, as we have them, always existed. It is therefore easy for them to misunderstand the motives of the fancier and, assuming him to be engrossed in an idler's hobby, condemn him for the hours he spends with his birds. The fact is, however, that very often they are hours of quiet observation and thoughtful study. It should be remembered that the men who have been devoted to their fowls, who, while the surrounding countryside has been asleep, 37 38 THE AMERICAN BREEDS OF POULTRY have carried the lantern to the poultry house because they were interested in the birds that were roosting there, are the men who have given us the breeds. They have had in their nind's eye "the better fowl," and we need to recognize and appreciate the contribu- tions that they have made. Breeders supply seed stock. The fancier-breeder is a negligible minority in the production of poultry and eggs for human consump- tion, but as the producer of seed stock for a great animal industry, he is the master key. Where is the farmer who has decided to get better poultry, a more uniform and more productive flock, to get this better stock except from a breeder of Standardbred poultry? There are those who profess to be interested in utility alone. But when they come to buy foundation stock they do not purchase mon- grels; instead, they secure stock birds, eggs for hatching, or chicks of the improved races. Who established these breeds and varieties? If devoid of the breeding instinct, the commercial poultryman does not improve the stock which he carries on his plant any more than a feeder of hogs improves the breeds of swine. Indeed, the breeders who made the breeds, who are the custodians of the standards to which they are bred, who from year to year reinvest the blood of the best poultry of America and bring forth a new generation, are First prize_ pen of Buff Plymouth Rocks at the Kentucky State Show, 1898. Here is a reddish-buff male and four females that are buff only in hackle. Only the conscientious study and painstaking work of constructive breeders has developed the pure buff birds of today. Let those who would belittle the work of fanciers realize that such a pen as is here illustrated would today be typical of the variety were it not for the fancier-breeders, THE BREEDER— HIS PLACE AND HIS WORK 39 the constructive improvers of our stock. They bear a vital relation- ship to the great poultry industry. They deserve much credit and every encouragement. The problem of production rests with the farmer and commercial poultryman. The breeder's function, his excuse for being, is to breed stock birds that have a hereditary capacity for producing in the least time and at the least expense the maximum of what is required, coupled with uniformity of size, shape, color and temperament, so that a clutch of chicks may be depended upon to grow evenly, to mature about the same time, to attain about the same size and type, and to possess about the same temperament. That is a man's job, and the man who fills it occupies a position alike honorable and useful. He must be remunerated for the thought and patient effort which he devotes to this work; so birds of good breeding, like silk, cannot be purchased at the prices of calico. The qualifications of a breeder. Who can become a constructive breeder? Not every man, any more than every farmer can become a livestock breeder. Many grain farmers become live stock feeder^ in order to secure a satisfactory crop rotation and economically utilize corn roughages that they grow as a by-product of their grain. But, as feeders, their business is to convert feed into meat, and their relations are with the shippers and commission houses. To be a breeder, one must needs be a man among men. This does not mean lavish expenditures for entertainment during shows. It means the possession of the breeder's instinct; a sympathetic under- standing akin to affection for our dumb friends, even those of the feathered type; an exalted aspiration to be a producer and to bring forth something better, and withal the patience to "carry on." Such a man reads a little, experiments some, and thinks a great deal. Such a man is a fancier. He ever strives to improve his own stud, and seeks and enjoys the company of other stock improvers. He goes to a poultry show and fails to hear the roosters crowing in the noisy, merry place because he is intensely interested in the birds themselves. At his own home he somehow feels that the hens are not laying eggs especially for someone's breakfast, but rather to reproduce their own species, and all their lives he mates and cares for his birds with a view to their breeding possibilities. His poultry plant is not a factory where hen machines are kept solely to convert raw material or feed into a finished product, meat or eggs. It is a place where the lives of the fowls are marked, first, by the period of embryonic development, then the period of actual growth, and, lastly, the period of reproduction. There is a difference between production and reproduction. One is the function of a relentless machine; the other is a process by which a new organism is generated from that already existing and the perpetuation of the species assured. The stock becomes plastic in the hands of the breeder. There is THE BREEDER— HIS PLACE AND HIS WORK 41 response to every thoughtful selection and wise mating. There is infinite scope for study and experimentation, and fact on fact, correc- tion on correction, the breeder builds up a rich knowledge of breeding. He does not learn suddenly or swiftly — Nature does not teach that way; but "slowly, gradually, with infinite reserve, with delicate con- fidences, as if to prolong our instructions, that we may not forsake her companionship," she yields up her secrets to the student who is devoted to his work. This should be understood: all men alike have the same sort of feed to use, their birds breathe the same air and range on the same Mother Earth, and the success achieved depends very largely on the intelligence with which the breeder's efforts are directed. The poultry show. At the close of the growing season and during the winter months the poultry exhibitions are held. The birds are then in full bloom, both the old birds that have come through the molt and the young birds which are then mature. With the advent of the poultry show season the time is at hand for breeders to put down the product of their thought and labor to compete with that of one another, and the breeder-artists vie with one another in exhibit- ing the birds in which they have sought to give an expression of reality to the Standard ideals. Force of circumstances, unfortunately, has tended to alienate the best breeders of purebred poultry from the breeders of purebred livestock. When the stockmen are showing their animals at the fairs, the poultry breeder finds that the majority of his old birds are in the molt and his young stock is still immature. The show is the purebred breeder's best means of securing an audience and giving expression to his work, and the poultrymen have to leave the fairs largely to professional showmen who carry a railroad car full of various sorts of fowls. In order to exhibit his best specimens in the pink of con- dition, the poultryman patronizes the exclusive winter shows, with the consequence that he often loses contact with the breeders of other kinds of livestock, and especially with the rural population, who without reflection may think of poultry breeding as a thing apart from the purebred livestock business. As an encouragement to poultry breeders, several of the leading states, including Illinois, Minnesota and Iowa, together with the province of Ontario, Canada, have provided means of subsidiary sup- port to poultry shows from public funds. For instance, up to $250 may be appropriated by the boards of supervisors in each of the 102 counties of Illinois, and up to $400 may be appropriated in Iowa. The money is made available to encourage the exhibition of the seed stock of a great animal industry. The merit of the purebred show has been well summed up by Professor Herbert W. Mumford in the following words: "With all its imperfections, the livestock show is, for a series of years, the best available measure of merit for pedigreed breeding animals." 42 THE AMERICAN BREEDS OF POULTRY Some criticism has been directed against the poultry show because of the standards by which birds are rejected and disqualified. Both sides of the case should be stated. It is argued that Standard dis- qualifications should be for malformations of body, evident lack of vigor, and deficient breed characteristics. It is said to be absurd to disqualify a bird of good substance for what properly should be termed a defect, while an inferior utility specimen wins the premier honor. The classic example of such a case, cited by Felch, was that of a trio of birds that founded the famous old Essex strain of Barred Plymouth Rocks which "was disqualified at Music Hall show, Boston, for downy feathers between the toes of one of the hens; yet in them we find 'the stone the builders rejected has become the chief stone of the corner'." On the other hand, if you could have seen on an express truck at a junction in Iowa a pair of Silver Wyandottes that were being shipped for stock purposes, you probably would have favored the inclusion of numerous technical and arbitrary disqualifications as a protection to the buyer. Such was the motive that actuated Reese V. Hicks, as chairman of the 1915 Standard revision committee, to cham- pion the retention of the disqualifications in the text of the American Standard of Perfection. This is the copyrighted text published by the American Poultry Association, which is the guide of the judge in the showroom. Appreciating the quality of a specimen. Knowledge of what con- stitutes a good bird comes from study, observation, experience. It cannot be summed up in a single sentence. The phrases in the Standard are hollow and empty to one who never has caught the vision of a detailed fowl and to whom "all Barred Plymouth Rocks look like mongrels." When you look at a specimen you can see only what you know. I see much in a Buff Plymouth Rock cockerel, but in a Duroc-Jersey hog I can see little more than an arched back, and gather an impres- sion of the head and an uncertain idea of the size. When a herdsman steps up to the animal and puts his finger on a wind-puff on the hock, I see that also. It has been pointed out Some learn faster than others what constitutes a fowl. The first section of a bird I ever noticed was the wing. Many people see the comb first and count the points. I was slow to distinguish a bay eye from a gray eye, always seeing the pupil instead of the iris which carries the color, and likewise slow to distinguish between pure white and the brassy or straw color effect common to some white males. It was a source of secret discouragement to me not to be able to look at the back of a male and see the straw color that was quite prevalent in the White Wyandottes of twenty years ago. These points now seem simple enough. No time is ever lost by the beginner in training his eye to appre- ciate conformations and other qualities that go to make up high THE BREEDER— HIS PLACE AND HIS WORK 43 class specimens. By accepting the visible qualities of fowls at their true worth, you establish a base on which the imagination may safely play in picturing the possibilities of birds when mating up the breed- ing pens. Breeding is not merely a matter of pedigree; simply breeding back to a good sire or dam is not in itself sufficient to guarantee success, and an eye for a bird is the greatest asset that any breeder can have. The work of the breeder. The poultry breeder sees a great deal of breeding. He not only is working with a species that matures quickly and has an annual cycle, but the number of eggs that a single hen may lay in the breeding season, or the number of young that one sire may get, is great enough to afford a wide range for observation and critical selection when the j-oung are grown. A Shorthorn cattleman may buy a bred cow and raise a bull calf; buy two heifers "on speculation"; go to a sale and buy a cow with a calf at her side, and be termed one of the purebred breeders of his county. In reality, such man has purchased only a little blood, and has a feed lot back of him. The poultry breeder must be infinitely more than this. He must be a detail man. He must know every part of the material with which he works, and, in addition to knowing good quality when he sees it, he must know the fundamentals of breeding good quality. Building a strain. There are beginners who take up poultry and secure stock from one breeder, then from another source the follow- ing year, keeping within the breed, to be sure; yet these buyers do not have a clear perception of what they are seeking, because they do not have a clear perception of what they are trying to produce. New blood should be introduced for a definite purpose, to improve some point, to check some fault. There can be no such definiteness of purpose unless the breeder has a standard of quality well defined in his mind and is ever working toward that ideal. If the experienced breeder were to go out of business and then begin over again to reestablish himself, he would go to a flock of his chosen breed, and, with the Standard type firmly set in his mind, he would select from the available specimens, with some respect to blood lines and pedigree, those that measured up to what he required. None would be perfect but all would be strong, healthy birds, with a good point to balance and counteract every poor point possessed by any other, so that, as far as possible, birds having the same defects would not have to be mated together. This selection would give the breeder, in his chosen birds and carefully mated pens, a selective type that would distinctly set his line of stock ahead of the common pre- vailing type. By interbreeding this stock, the breeder soon would have a strain within the breed — his own strain. The value of selection. Selection is the secret of the breeder's magic. It enabled Sir John Sebright to produce a breed of Bantams which bears his name and of which breed the birds were so uniform 44 THE AMERICAN BREEDS OF POULTRY in type, so beautifully marked and precisely colored that even his own friends are reported to have doubted his ability to produce such won- drous lilliputians of the feathered tribe, and to have stated openly that he must have imported them from some foreign land. It is selection that has enabled the Polled Hereford breeders to breed the horns off Hereford cattle within a single decade — something that nature had not done in all the centuries. It was intelligently directed selection that established the American breeds and arranged in order that medley of heredity and variation that arose when the Asiatic and European stock was crossed. Selection is not new. It is recorded that the ancient Chinese sought to improve their sheep by choosing with particular care the lambs that were to be used for breeding, in nourishing them well, and keeping the flocks separate. They practiced the selection of rice seed of large size. The phaeony tree has been cultivated, according to Chinese traditions, for fourteen hundred years. The propagation of plants and the domestication of animals is one of the oldest pursuits of man. When the human race entered the agricultural stage it could not have been long in learning that what it sowed, that likewise did it reap. The appearance and very exist- ence of his food became the result of man's own act. It is not improbable that the cock that made a successful growth and attained a maximum development against the one that made a moderate and indifferent growth, has long been selected for the stud. It is said that the Fuegian, possessing but the small intellectual attainments of the south sea savages, practices selection in the breeding of his dogs, and if he has "a large, strong and active bitch" he puts her to a fine dog and takes care to feed her well, "that the young may be strong and well favored." Natural selection. Man works quickly by consciously making selections of the best and most desired type. It is important, how- ever, to realize that while man on this earth is loose in a portion of the Creator's workshop and is endowed with a brain that aspires and still aspires, he has only limited dominion. In addition to his artificial selections, natural selection, or the survival of the fittest, is working all the while. The breeder is on safe ground only as long as he works in harmony with nature, who always is seeking to keep the domesticated races from becoming enfeebled; and if the breeder disregards the fundamental biological factors of constitutional vigor and by careful selection perpetuates a short type of Wyandotte, or effeminate type of Bantam, natural selection steps in and decreases fertility. It is important, therefore, that all ideals should be sound, that they should represent the most useful and productive types. Inbreeding. Having an understanding of type which is funda- mental in breeding, the breeder makes selections of this type from year to year, and practices inbreeding, that variability from the desired type may be reduced. The very word "inbreeding" is highly THE BREEDER— HIS PLACE AND HIS WORK 45 distasteful to many people. The fact is, however, that some of the greatest animals in history have been produced by close inbreeding. An inbred individual has fewer different ancestors than the maxi- mum possible number. A table showing the maximum possible number of ancestors for twenty generations follows: Generation Maximum Possible Number of Ancestors Generation Maximum Possible Number of Ancestors 1st 2 llth 2,648 2d 4 12th 4,096 3d 8 13th 8,192 4th 16 14th 16,384 5th 32 15th 32,768 6th 64 16th 65,536 7th 128 17th 131,072 8th 256 18th 262,144 9th 512 19th 524,288 10th 1,025 20th 1,048,576 It is plain from this tabulation that to produce an unrelated pair of birds at the end of twenty generations, the foundation stock would have to number over one million head. Of course, no flock, or even breed, could have such a multiple origin. Therefore, inbreeding in some degree becomes necessary because of overwhelming numbers. Inbreeding is necessary to reduce the number of ancestors and thereby reduce the chances of variation. Inbreeding intensifies and fixes the characters that are so bred. It was resorted to by early breeders of purebred poultry because outside their own or related flocks they were not able to find and procure birds that would serve their purposes as well as birds of their own breeding or birds of blood relationship to their own stock. The evil effects of inbreeding are not infrequently evil effects result- ing from the breeding of weak birds, for when father is mated to daughter, or brother to sister, or mother to son, not only the good points are intensified, but weaknesses are likewise augmented. If there is a constitutional predisposition to weakness in the stock, it becomes accentuated when bred in-and-in. As practiced by breeders, the principal purpose of inbreeding is to restrict, that is, to simplify, the blood lines by excluding all outside characters and tendencies, thus intensifying the points which the breeder has selected and which he desires to perfect and perpetuate. It has been said that at last an inbred family breaks down and "runs out." There appears to be no evidence of this when the standard bred to is a sensible standard, a true ideal that does not encourage the development and perpetuation of freakish traits. Even though it be granted, however, that inbreeding at last leads to decadence, it is not 46 THE AMERICAN BREEDS OF POULTRY a sufficient argument against the intensification of good qualities. The strain so bred, with its established quality, may raise the general quality of the variety before the family or strain itself becomes extinct. Even though the period of vigor for the strain should be comparatively short, the breed as a whole partakes of the improve- ment, and the good of the closely bred family is absorbed by the mass as the result of the dissemination of stock birds. The fear of inbreeding is losing its terrors. It is becoming gener- ally understood that a fixity of type can be secured and maintained only through in-and-in breeding. When size and vigor are selected the same as shape and color, no disease or deformity may be attributed to close breeding as a cause. Linebreeding. Many cases of inbreeding do not represent line- breeding. Linebreeding is commonly looked upon as involving the breeding together of specimens of the same strain or family, but less closely related than in inbreeding. This interpretation makes line- breeding a mild form of inbreeding; but the fact is that linebreeding may involve a very close form of inbreeding. When the application of inbreeding is in the hands of a thinker who is ever drawing his blood lines from the past and projecting them into the future; when inbreeding is practiced by a constructive breeder whose aim is to concentrate the blood of certain individuals, then inbreeding properly is termed "linebreeding." This term "linebreeding" was used originally by the cattle breeders of England to indicate that the progeny were bred in a direct line from a famous ancestor. Inbreeding is to breed within the line; yet related specimens may be mated to very little purpose, and some inbred flocks are not line- bred. If a cockerel is mated to his dam to fix or intensify some quality possessed by the dam or characteristic or her sire and the line from which she came, the progeny resulting from the union of that cockerel mated to his dam are linebred. When a specimen is truly a linebred bird it is the product of a system of breeding that has been carried on to stamp certain desirable and valuable char- acteristics of the ancestors on the offspring. Value of linebred birds. Breeders have been known to inbreed their fowls for fifteen to twenty-five years without the introduction of a single new bird. The most renowned producers of high quality Standard specimens have been close breeders, without exception. Invariably they have maintained that no evil effects accrue to line- breeding. On the contrary, in, the case of these successful breeders, their stock reaches such a high state of perfection that they know to a nicety what may be expected from a mating before the chicks are grown, and they dread the introduction of ^resh blood, fearing that it will spoil the blood lines which it has taken them the greater part of their lives to establish. Variation. While linebred strains can be counted upon to repro- THE BREEDER— HIS PLACE AND HIS WORK 47 duce their like with fewer birds showing a turning out of line, even in closely bred lines in which the number of different ancestors has been reduced considerably there are to be found fluctuations in size, shape, color, etc. If such were not the case and there were no varia- tions to afford the breeder a field from which to make selections, selective breeding by which further improvement could be made would be impossible. If there were no distinguishing differences between birds of the same breed, there would be no best bird, no poorest. These fluctuations give individuality to each bird and permit it to be set definitely in the scale of values. "Variation precedes, the breeder follows." Those who wish to do constructive breeding should early learn that a hen is more than a unit. A hen is an individual, arid scarcely any two are alike. Numerous and varied charts on linebreeding have been published, and the weakness of these theoretical chart systems is in the fact that they estimate as mere units in a grand plan the birds that are employed in the breeding operations from year to year. The man who breeds chickens soon learns that there are such things as prepotency, long life, strong constitutional vigor — all of which are the possession of some birds. When the breeder finds such a specimen he is able to use it to good advantage for several years. The chart system of breeding, however, takes for granted that one specimen is as strong a breeder as another, but every practical breeder knows that this is not the case. Prepotency. Occasionally there is born into the line a specimen of unusual vigor and outstanding quality, and he not only transmits but stamps himself upon his, progeny. Fortunate is the breeder who secures a prepotent sire of this kind. A single instance will serve to illustrate the value of such a bird. For years an important section of the Buff Wyandotte fancy cen- tered around northeastern New York state. About 1900 a number of the best breeders participated with an entry at the Cambridge (New York) fair to determine which of them had the best stock. R. Brooks Robbins showed a sensational male bird which has been described to us by John D. Jaquins as "possessing an even shade of color, a little chestnut on tail, and nearly clear wings — about a shade darker than is being shown now." At that time this bird was the only short-backed, typical round-typed male of the variety that had been shown. He was entered as a cockerel, but before the ribbons were placed Mr. Jacquins bought the bird and reentered him as a cock, the fair being held in August and the bird having been hatched very late the previous season. Mr. Jacquins bought the male for fifteen dollars. Frank Bean offered twenty-five dollars for him. Every breeder who saw the bird appreciated him, and Mr. Jacquins had a number of chances to sell him, "inquiries even coming from Canada for this wonderful male that had been written up in papers." The bird at last was purchased 48 THE AMERICAN BREEDS OF POULTRY by the late Warren T. Lord at something like fifty dollars and became the foundation of Mr. Lord's fine male line. Indeed, from this sire was developed the best line of Buff Wyandotte males in the country. Principles of breeding. Thus far we have outlined in a general way the work of the constructive breeder of Standardbred poultry. Strictly adhering to a rigid standard, he makes closely culled matings, giving the preference in reproduction only to the best; he linebreeds to intensify the blood of these good specimens, and never fails to take advantage of an exceptional bird that promises to improve his line. The best breeders are always keen students, keeping records of pedigrees by toe-marking the chicks, not infrequently making special or experimental matings, and always noting results. Their progress has outrun science, and the teachers of the principles which underlie the practical breeder's art are just beginning to present comprehensive rules which classify the subject of heredity. The papers of G. Mendel have offered the modern basis for an analysis of breeding. Mendel was an Austrian monk who was deeply interested in the mode of inheritance. The results of his experiments were first reported in 1865, but went unheeded. The papers were rediscovered in 1900, and the last twenty years have developed a steadily clearing conception of the processes of inheritance. Mendel was aware that the subject of heredity was complex and intricate, so he limited himself to simple and prominent features, such as long stem versus short stem of peas. He crossed tall peas that measured six feet with dwarf peas one foot high. The result was that all the plants were tall. He therefore said that the tall character was dominent and the short character was recessive. These tall hybrids were then reproduced and out of a thousand plants grown, there were approximately three that were tall to every one that was short. It was then found that the short plants appeared to be purebred, for the following year they produced all short stems. When the tall plants self-fertilized and reproduced it was found that one tall plant in three appeared to be pure and transmitted tallness with certainty. Thus we see Mendel reducing heredity of this pair of characters to mathematical certainty. Inheritance of Rose and Single Combs. Mendel's pea experiment has been repeated by crossing rose comb fowls on single comb fowls. The results are identical, that is, all the hybrids are rose combed, and when they are bred together they produce 3 rose to 1 single, and the single is pure single. A pure rose comb, inheriting roseness from both sire and dam, may be indicated by the letters R R; a pure single, S S; while a bird that inherits roseness from one parent and the single form from the other parent has a comb that may be designated as R S. When pure rose is mated to pure single, that is when R R is mated to S S the birds produced in the first generation are all rose1 combed, because rose is the dominant factor. From the standpoint of inheritance these combs are not pure THE BREEDER— HIS PLACE AND HIS WORK 49 rose because one of the parents was single combed. This first gen- eration may therefore be indicated as R S. When R S is mated together the rose and single comb factors separate themselves in some of the progeny and 25 percent come as pure single, and 75 per- cent as rose of which one-third are pure rose and two-thirds are impure rose. When the 50 percent impure rose are bred together they likewise give 25 percent pure rose and 25 percent pure single. RRXSS RS F1 g-pnerati^n 1 RR i I R S R S S S r L veneration 50% This application of Mendel's principles shows that a plant or animal is not an indivisable whole or that the breeding of it is largely chance. It indicates that our fowls are a combination of rather definite factors; each character being represented in the germ cells of the reproductive system by some factor that is transmitted not by mere chance but in an orderly manner. It is reasonable to believe that the factors may become contaminated in crossing and that the highest quality results from pure breeding; but the big point is that a fowrl inherits different characters as somewhat definite factors. The business of the breeder, therefore, is to consider the charac- ters in his line that are well established and can be depended upon to reproduce themselves. The factors of perfection may exist in a flock, yet perfection may never be exemplified in any one individual. Hav- ing noted the points in the flock that are good, the next thing is to consider those characters which require improvement. Perhaps size should be increased. We have already explained in connection with the rise of the Cochin, Chapter I, that size cleoencls upon a growth tendency that is inherited; and this point is illustrated in Chapter II where it is related that Standard sized Plymouth Rock males on the government farm transmitted a tendency for increased size when mated to small mongrel hens. The possible size of a bird is there- fore determined by a factor for this character in the germ substance of the egg from which the bird is born. In order to get large sized young stock, you must therefore breed a bird of good size and sub- stance, for feeding alone cannot grow a bird bigger than its inherited capacity to size. Breeding for increased egg production. Egg production likewise depends in the first place, upon inheritance. At the Maine Agricultural Experiment Station it was found that one female with 1,550 yolks or ova that were visible upon examination of her ovary, had produced 13 eggs during the winter months; a female with 2,145, produced no winter eggs; one with 2,451, laid 54 winter eggs; while a female that 50 THE AMERICAN BREEDS OF POULTRY was found to have 2,306 had a winter production of 3 eggs. Almost any female will carry enough minute yolks to theoretically make a 200-egg hen for five successive years. What is it then that gears hens up so that they will mature a larger number of these yolks and lay a larger number of eggs? The answer is a factor that represents high production which the bird must inherit. There is a distinguishable difference between low production or less than 30 eggs during the winter months, and high production or more than 30 eggs during the winter months. Let us observe how high producing pullets have actually been bred from low producers. The hen that has a winter egg yield of less than 30 eggs is a hen and has an ovary and H will stand for her. She lays some eggs and E will stand for this character. The hen that lays less than 30 eggs may therefore be designated as HE. Now, if a hen is to be a high layer, a new factor is necessary in the germ plasm. Let IGHT stand for this new factor. The low producer inherited and possesses two fac- tors H and E, while the high producer inherited a supplemental factor IGHT which raises the first two factors, hen and eggs, to HEIGHT of egg production. At the Maine Station where the breeding experiments were carried on, it was found that females may possess all these factors and be high producers, yet they can transmit to their pullets only the first two, and the determining factor for high production must be possessed and transmitted by the male. Accordingly it was found that a prop- erly bred and fully possessed male would grade up a low producing flock in a single generation. The factor for increased production is not present in all males and being an invisible hereditary cell, its pres- ence can only be determined by experimental breeding of the individual itself. Chapter IV will hold out some help to the breeder in pick- ing his birds for egg production according to easily distinguished somatic characters; nevertheless, the experimental evidence on the inheritance of fecundity is as valuable as it is interesting in showing that inheritance for high production is not from dam to daughter but from sire to daughter, and therefore a poor male mated to high producing females will Decrease the production of the pullets for they depend upon their sire for the inheritance of the excess produc- tion factor. The lesson to be learned. A conception of the fowl not as an indivisible whole but as a composite whole made up in an orderly and consistent manner of different parts which behave and are trans- mitted as factors, gives rise to several important subjects. First, a bird may be purebred in respect to one character and not pure in respect to another. Blue color in chickens, for instance, is never pure, which is to say that blue chickens always produce some black and some splashed white chicks. Such a bird while not pure for blue color may be pure in respect to other characters; for instance, comb. Second, on figuring transmission the old way which was as THE BREEDER— HIS PLACE AND HIS WORK. 51 Sire Dam 100% 100% 1st Generation 50% \ 2nd Generation An Unsatisfactory Way of Indicating Inheritance. 75% 3rd Generation follows: a specimen inherits one-half from its parents, one-quarter from its grandparents, one-eighth from its great-grandparents, for that is not a satisfactory way of indicating inheritance, because it does not take into account the true hereditary processes. Third, a cheap bird that possesses a desirable feature may be employed in breeding, and the character incorporated in the flock along with other desirable characters already established therein. For instance, a light eye is recessive to red, and if a flock is weak in eye color, a red-eyed bird will improve it quickly; and this flock improver, or male, need not have every other good quality possessed by the flock. Fourth, if a new bird is introduced into the breeding yards, the progeny resulting from the cross may not exhibit the desired quality in the first genera- tion, as, for example, if a single comb character were introduced into a pure rose comb flock, the chicks would carry rose combs; but if these chicks are bred between themselves, they would produce a certain proportion of pure breeding single combs. This is an extreme example which the practical breeder will not have occasion to duplicate but the point is that many a breeder has introduced into his yard what appeared to be a specimen possessed of desirable quality and being disappointed with the results, dis- carded all the birds produced, whereas in another generation he could expect the parental character to manifest itself in some of the chicks. Fifth, the number of points that a breeder may strive for in a single mating are limited. More than three or four points at a time is beyond the range of the most skilled breeder. The chances of satisfying the breeder's expectations and his re- quirements by finding in a single bird that is born into the line a combination of three or four points along which improvement is being sought is even less than the chance of finding any one charac- ter or a combination of any two. It is because the breeding for a few characters at a time is not only more simple but the more cer- tain that a large part of pedigree-breeding for eggs is carried on 52 THE AMERICAN BREEDS OF POULTRY with white varieties where the color consideration is all but elimi- nated. It should be understood that these characters or different factors which make up the complete fowl, are not always sharply separated from one another, or rigid and immutable as atoms are. Experi- ence indicates that they may become somewhat contaminated in cross- breeding. Two apparently distinct characters are sometimes asso- ciated together, as for instance: pure yellow shank and pure black neck plumage in a Black Wyandotte male is never found in the same individual, it being impossible in this case for nature to give full expression to the shank character unless a sacrifice is made in under color of neck. Some of the other points in which the breeder is interested will be found not to yield to simple analysis, and all of the processes of heredity cannot be reduced to simple terms. Values that command good prices. In the sale and distribution of Standardbred poultry there are three measures of value (A) the individual merit that the specimen exhibits, (B) the breeding that the bird possesses, say its pedigree, (C) the record of the bird as a breeder or producer of choice specimens. An occasional bird may qualify in all three respects but such a one is almost priceless. The majority of buyers insist on individual merit, assuming that the bird would not possess the desired quality unless it was properly bred. This point is carried to the extreme by many farmers who require cockerelbred Barred Rock males. At the same time they complain that their females run too dark, yet it is only on the strongest representation of a conccientious breeder that they will accept a pulletbred male which is too light in color to appear well yet is what is needed. High priced buyers commonly insist on "a good looker" asking "what is the use to buy breeding value unless the bird is itself a demonstration that the breeding will produce"? This argument holds good nine times out of ten, but now and again you find a good looker that has been produced from an excess color mating and is a full brother to a number of wasters; and unless you have some idea of his breeding it may be difficult to mate him to advantage. On the other hand, a full brother to a winner, even though the brother is a little coarse, may prove a splendid purchase. A few buyers will buy breeding, figuring that breeding alone will come cheaper than breeding coupled with individual merit. In this case it is necessary to rely on the reputation of the seller to ship something that is bred right. This emphasizes the importance of buying only from an established breeder who has some standing in the poultry fraternity. When such a purchase is made, the buyer may feel that his bird carries the best of blood and though not presenting the best appearance, the quality is there as a latent factor and blood will tell. A striking instance of such a purchase was brought to the writer's attention at the Washington (D. C.) show of January, 1917. THE BREEDER— HIS PLACE AND HIS WORK 53 Mr. R. J. Waldron exhibited three splendid Barred Rock pullets which won 1st, 2d and 3d. We placed one of his pulletbred cocks 1st and another 4th. He came to us later and asked how we liked the 4th cock, and we remarked: "He has no under barring, is almost white half way to the skin." Yes, said Mr. Waldron, "I have sold better looking males for $5 but I paid $50 for this fellow because he was bred right and he is the sire of my three winning pullets." There is a true story of a man in the northern Wisconsin woods who bred a certain variety for many years. Every year or two he would send to the breeder of an old established strain for a new bird, sometimes a male, sometimes a female. Never did he receive, for the price he paid, a specimen as good as his own best birds, and yet his new purchase always resulted in producing better birds than he ever had before. That was because the birds which were shipped to him had been bred right for generations, and carried the rich, strong blood lines of a valuable strain. Still fewer birds are purchased on known performance as breeders. because the life of a fowl is relatively short and by the time a bird is a proven breeder the owner is reluctant to part with it. These known producers are not always the image of the Standard illustra- tions but may be rather rustic appearing. They invariably are birds of evident vitality, standing strong and linn on legs and toes, broad backed and well chested. Not infrequently they are found to carry some defects that prohibit them from taking part in the great con- tests in the show rooms and limit their career to the breeding yard. This is not altogether unfortunate for many a finished cockerel of great promise has been enfeebled by over showing and is then brought home and mated to too many females. This is one reason many cockerels never "come back" as cocks and the rougher bird at home proves the stronger breeder. Fortunately for the poultry breeder, the demand for males is equal to that for females. This is as it should be. While one male may be mated to eight to fifteen females, depending on range, etc., everybody is not just starting with poultry and in the market for foundation stock. Many have the females and they simply need new males. There are a great many Hocks of the popular American breeds throughout the country and the big progress and big improve- ment in building up that stock of the general people, rests in the use of good males. "A good male is half the flock, a poor one is more than half." A good female is of value in the hands of the breeder, but the good of a breed is distributed and put into circula- tion by the males. The blood of good breeding females is only dissi- pated when in the hands of an or'dinary breeder; in the hands of a good breeder that same blood is invaluable. The instances of breeders getting ahead through the purchase of high-priced females rather than males, are relatively few. On the whole, it requires more pains and intelligent handling to develop a male than it does a female. 54 THE AMERICAN BREEDS OF POULTRY A somewhat larger proportion of males show poorer build and less symmetry and finish, than females. Fully mature breeding birds of both sexes when mated together are the more dependable producers of the truly masculine type of male, which is necessary if a cockerel is to display that vitality, strength of bone, substance of body and finish of plumage that is required in the 1st prize winners at the leading shows. A successful breeder of males recently remarked that every fall he "puts away" some of his best pullets and "forgets about them" until they are hens, when they are employed in the breeding yards. The function of breeding is to put potential qualities into that new organism which is to develop from the germ and bursts its envelope and usher forth into the world, and accompanying its inheritance of shape and color must be a vital strength that will enable the chick to make a full and successful development. This pronounced vitality cannot be acquired, it too must be inherited from thrifty, mature breeding stock. CHAPTER IV BREED TYPE Standard of shape — Relation of size to type — Importance of plumage — Body shape and typical shape — Body shape of good layers — Breed- ing shape for high egg yield — Typical shape of breeds — An explana- tion of the different sections. While the Rocks, Wyandottes and Reds are closely allied, each breed has a type which distinguishes it. Years ago T. F. McGrew said that "shape makes the breed," because each breed should be bred to a definite shape and specimens which vary greatly from this accepted type are not worthy members of the breed. It is therefore important, if we are to have typical specimens of the race, to know what the Standard type is. If we refer to page 56 and look at the profile of a typical Plymouth Rock hen, we see that her back is of medium length with a slight concave to tail, while the back of the Rhode Island Red is long and flat, and that of the Wyandotte is moderately short and full. In addition to this question of conformation, there are certain breed characteristics such as the rose comb and round head in the Wyandotte, which are important points in lending distinctiveness to the breed. These distinctive points are often referred to as breed characteristics and their perfection gives breed character to any speci- men possessing them. Judging the shape of a bird. The standards of shape for the breeds take form in the breeder's mind only after study and obser- vation afford a true basis for knowledge, but once the standard is visualized, the judgment of the eye becomes quick and accurate and may be trusted in preference to mechanical measurements of different sections. To distinctly fix a clear ideal in the mind is absolutely essential, and this not only includes the general features, but also the minor points, for competition nowadays is so keen that nothing- may be neglected if winners are to be put down in fast company. Definite and complete knowledge leads to a discriminating eye and correct judgment. Birds are judged in the showroom by either of two systems, score card or comparison, and the show management decides on the method to be employed. The purpose of the score card is to record a mathematical valua- tion which a competent judge gives to the defects that are found in each section of the bird being scored. The cuts, as made by the judge, are then added, and their sum total is deducted from 100, which is the numerical value given to perfection. Thus a bird that is cut 55 BREED TYPE 57 six points scores 94. The highest scoring specimen wins 1st, the second highest scoring bird, 2d, and so on. The comparative method of judging requires that the judge make a mental comparison of the specimens on exhibition, and prizes are then awarded by the judge according to the apparent rank of the birds. This system is the more rapid, and also the more satisfactory when large classes of birds of superior and nearly equal quality are shown. In the actual practice of applying the score card, it is exceed- ingly difficult to meet all the line gradations of stature, type, feather and color with that mathematical accuracy which good score card judging requires, and judgment of the eye commonly proves to be the better measure. Relation of size to type. The quality presented by a bird is rela- tive. It is better or worse. Even weight which might appear to be positive, because it can be determined by the scales, is, after all, relative, because weight should be proportionate to the size of the bird, and a bird that meets the Standard weight requirement because it is fat, yet does not possess sufficient stature, fails in its general set-up to meet the true Standard of typical shape. Size is an impor- tant factor in the American breeds. Birds that are more than two pounds under Standard weight are disqualified in showrooms where the Standard of Perfection is enforced. Both weight and size arc printed on the official score cards and although a bird may be up to Standard weight, it may still be deficient in size. In judging size, the bird should have a reasonably large frame and be reasonably well fleshed. An especially fat specimen is never prime for breeding purposes. Birds and breeds that fat uncommonly easily are usually weak sexually. The Dorking breeders, whose fowls fur- nished the prime table poultry of England half a century ago, helped to spoil their own breeding stock, by fleshing their best specimens so that when a judge laid his hand on the breast it was plump and full. Fat males are inclined to give low fertility and over-fat females often lay soft-shelled or misshapen eggs. Cornish breeders are today experiencing the ill effects of over-conditioned birds. Where heavy egg yield is the sole object in breeding, size is easily lost, for the best layers are frequently the smaller specimens within the breed. For this reason it is difficult to hold size in highly specialized egg strains of the American breeds. Every poultryman can recall instances of pullets starting to lay early in life before they had attained the proportions and weight that are typical of the breed and they never did grow to sufficient size. O. F. Mittendorff of Illinois, who has specialized for some years in breeding Barred Plymouth Rocks for eggs, has an eye for size that he may have typical birds to comprise his flock, and he meets the issue by giving preference to a pullet that devotes the first 200 days to growth and development of body. This means that the 58 THE AMERICAN BREEDS OF POULTRY pullet starts laying when about seven months of age. She not only * attains good size in that time, but is evidently better fitted to stand up under the strain that metabolic demands make upon her system, as she proceeds to convert a large amount of feed into a big number of eggs. In other words, she is not a precocious pullet that starts to lay very young, before full growth is attained, and then never does develop into a Standardsized bird. The pullet that is well grown before laying commences has a large frame and can carry consider- able flesh, somewhat similar to a dairy cow about to go on test and whicli has been put in good flesh prior to the lactation period. It usually happens that pullets, which begin to lay November 1, gain steadily in weight until March 1, increasing to the extent of about one pound in the American breeds; and then generally fall off in weight until September or October. Importance of Plumage. Plumage has a great deal to do in giv- ing shape to a bird. It has all to do with the shape of the tail and wings and much to do with the outline of the back. In fact, the entire contour of the bird is largely dependent upon feather develop- ment. The neck of a dressed cock, for instance, is insignificant in size compared to the neck with flowing hackle of a live cock. If you strip the feathers from a Wyandotte and Rhode Island Red hen, and lay the two carcasses to- gether, there will not be the difference in body shape that the living specimens seemed to indicate. The Wyandotte hen's back and body plumage were quite full, giving her an appearance that was short in comparison with her length, while the flat, hori- zontal back, low, straight- out tail and relatively tight feather of the Red added to her apparent length. Breed- ers know the importance and appreciate the value of feath- er formation; they know how dependent is profile shape upon a properly bred and properly developed coat of plumage. Feather growth is costly. Growing chickens or molt- ing fowls requite nitrogen- Relation of Plumage, Flesh and Skeleton, OUS f°°d tO Produce the Reproduced by courtesy Pratt Food Company. plumage. A profuse feather Copyright. BREED TYPE 59 type is not as practical as a farm chicken as the harder feathered types; and the American breeds present an intermediate tendency in this respect, not being as tight feathered as the Game or as long and profusely feathered as the Cochin. Some types are useful. Some are expensive to produce. A type that depends for its shape on great length and profuseness of feather is costly to develop, because the full plumage has to be grown as well as the bone and body of the bird. Some types are dangerous to produce, because they are extreme and enfeeblement in the breed has followed their development. Plumage adds finish. A cockerel may appear somewhat ungainly, but as he grows and develops a proper plumage, he may "fill out." There are many competent critics of mature birds and when the win- ter issues of the poultry journals come out, illustrated with pictures of the winners at the winter shows, there follows a great deal of consideration and much discussion of the outlines of those finished specimens. The average man has the profiles of the Standard well i« mind. A really good judge, however, is one who can see the possi- bilities in a young growing bird. A man once visited the yards of Arthur G. Duston, Massachusetts, and his eye fell upon a White Wyandotte cockerel and he spoke of the bird as possessing wonderful possibilities. That winter this cockerel, out of several hundred that Mr. Duston raised, won 1st at the Madison Square Garden Show. When the White Orpingtons were introduced we went to England and visited a number of breeders, including Rev. A. Nodder who had some splendid maturing young stock. He had won 1st at Hay- wards Heath, one of the best early shows, on a cockerel that was one of the most promising young males to be found in all England. His tremendous bone and heavy body were plain, but he was short in hackle feather and he was not finished in tail, needing more time in which to complete the development of feather upon which typical shape is so dependent. The publication of a picture of this bird failed to create a ripple, although another English breeder exported $12,000 worth of stock and eggs that year. Too few could size up the quality of the Nodder stock by the unfinished male, although if they had sought in their own yards for a cockerel of even age, equal to the one in the picture, they would have found that many of their own birds had shanks like pencils, while the Nodder cockerel was standing on mill posts. Try to visualize the possibilities of your young stock, cull out the less promising, and give the advantages of yard space, feed and care to those that give promise of fulfilling the outlines of the typical specimen. Get them to roost early in life (on roosts 4 inches wide), so that the air can circulate all around them; and see that their tail plumage does not butt against the wall, for remember that their finish will depend in a large degree upon feather growth, 60 THE AMERICAN BREEDS OF POULTRY Feather is not merely to meet the Standard requirements and fulfill the eye of the breeder and judge. Feather is one of the important points in indicating the masculinity of a male. Immature cockerels are equally immature in plumage. Males of low constitutional vigor never develop wealth and furnish of feather. Full development of feather is typical of the mature, virile male. It gives him masculinity and markedly distinguishes him from the female. A weak and effemi- nate male invariably lacks the complete coat of plumage which is a sex character of a strong, virile cock. A strong head and large face are points that also determine mas- culinity. Too many males are effeminate in head features. In addi- tion may be mentioned substance, as a quality which gives body to the male and makes of him ''a rooster." Insistence on good substance eliminates from consideration all narrow bodied, long legged birds, which, like the scantily feathered ones, are usually weak. Body shape and typical shape. The American Poultry Associa- tion has failed to differentiate between the features that arise from body formation and those that are to be attributed to plumage and has, for instance, considered length of neck, and contour of neck, as shape of neck, although the one is dependent on bone structure and the other is an outline dependent upon plumage. There are but two descriptions in the Standard and two sections on the score card, one for shape, the other for color. This naturally leads to an over-emphasis of type as determined by plumage, although in a few breeds, such as Exhibition Games, where feather is bred as short, narrow and hard as possible, it has led to an abnormal struc- ture of body, resulting in a height or reach that impairs the utility functions of those fowls. An understanding of structure and feather as separate factors which contribute to shape, is desirable; the study of the exterior alone is superficial and leads to ephemeral ideals. What a bird looks like in the yard or show coop and how the same bird handles in the hand of the breeder are two separate mat- ters. A cockerel may have a pleasing outline, but upon handling it is found that he has a thin thigh, a poorly fleshed breast, a pent-up keel bone, or a crooked breast bone. A few of the points of body formation must be cut on the score card when they are found defective, and the growing tendency is to take body formation more and more into consideration. In order to distinguish between body formation and general outline, we recom- mend the use of the score card shown on page 61, which we devised after several years of experience in judging score card shows. We found that the typical shape of the bird could only be secured when the bird posed naturally in the coop. The moment you touched him, he might crowd to one side of the cage, or pinch down his feathers and thus lose his typical carriage. On the other hand, there were defects of body formation that should be cut in scoring, such as a crooked breast, and this fault could only be determined by taking SCORE CARD (Name of poultry show association here) (Date of show and address of association here) E.VII ibitor yariel y SV r Entry \o B md No Weight Typical Body Shape Shape Color Remarks Symmetry Weight or Sice i Condition Comb Head Beak Eyes Wattles and I'.ar Lobes. I Neck ! IVings Bach Tail • Breast . .... Body and Fluff EC at and Toes *C>'cst and Beard ^Shortness of Feather Total Cuts i 11 . . . .Score . . ludac Srrrptarv * Applies to crested breeds. | Applies to Games and Game Bantama. 62 THE AMERICAN BREEDS OF POULTRY the bird in hand and feeling his breast bone. The division of shape, therefore, was designed as a practical advance in score card judging. New points are now being introduced, such as abdominal capacity and shape of pelvic bones. They, too, are distinct from typical shape or general outline and deserve separate examination and recording. Body shape of good layers. Because the general appearance of laying hens varies greatly, it was for a long time assumed that there was no egg type. Egg capacity, however, has been found correlated with body formation, and that general appearance of the bird which is dependent on the plumage may continue to vary in different high producers. It has been found that the good layers have large intes- tinal development to permit the assimilation and elimination of large quantities of food. 1 Large and small abdominal capacity. The bird on the left has large intestines. The bird on the right is "dried up," having small Intestinal capacity. The carcass to the left in the illustration of dressed fowls shown herewith, shows good intestinal development. The abdomen in the live bird was large and soft. Large intestines are a fundamental in good layers; but a large abdomen or belly that is full and hard indicates layers of fat around the entrails rather than large intestines, and such a hen is of the meat type rather than the egg type. The body of a heavy layer in the flush of laying should not only be large but found to be soft and pliable when your finger is gently pressed against the abdomen. Culling the flock. Abdominal capacity is measured by the dis- tance between the end of breastbone and the pelvic bones. The car- cass to the right shows small egg capacity, the breastbone curving toward the pelvic bones so that not more than two fingers can be placed between them. Following are shown the methods of measuring this capacity in living specimens. On either side of the vent, just below the vent are the ends of the two pelvic or lay bones. They may BREED TYPE 63 be easily felt through the thin skin of the abdomen, as they are well developed. Some aerial species of birds have small development of pelvis, but this is not the case with the domestic hen. The distance from the pelvic bones to the rear end of keel or Two Fingers Capacity Between the Pelvic Bones and End of Breast- bone— This Hen Should Be Culled and Marketed. breastbone, varies from one to seven fingers. The larger capacity indicates the better layer. With this should be considered the soft- ness of the abdomen. Fat around the intestines will make the abdo- men relatively hard, whereas in the hen of high potential egg-laying 64 THE AMERICAN BREEDS OE POULTRY capacity, the abdomen is rather soft and pliable like the udder of a cow after milking. The bony structure of the pelvis should also be considered. Lay- bones in strictly egg-type females run from about % inch in thick- ness to about y$ inch. Over this and up to 1 inch and even \l/2 inch is the beef type. However, a flock of White Plymouth Rock hens Four fingers capacity. If coupled with this capacity, the abdomen is soft and pliable like the udder of a cow that has been milked, and the pelvic bones are reasonably thin and flexible, this is a satisfactory hen to keep. can be graded too closely on the laybone test, because the females of a large breed of this kind seem to naturally carry a somewhat heavier bone. A safe rule is that the laybone should tend to thin- ness. They should be straight out and rather pliable when the tip ends of the two bones are gently pressed together. When a hen lays BREED TYPE 65 an egg, it comes out the vent passing between the pelvic arch. The thin bone that is pliable indicates easy passage of egg, enabling the lien to lay her egg quickly. She is thus released to scratch and gather the food nutrients that are required to form an egg for the next day. Such a hen is an easy layer, soon off the nest and busy scratching, wearing down her toenails. In the hen has curved pelvic bones, curved together like a pair of cow's horns, and they are rigid, not pliable, we would cull her out, even though she had fair capacity. Hens with thick bones put on fat easily. The thin bone is an indication of the egg type or temperament which readily converts the feed consumed into eggs. J. W. Parks' 325 egg hen, Miss Smarty, has laybones y2 inch thick. The feature, however, is counterbalanced by an enormous crop, 7 finger abdomen and large body. Internal organs. It cannot be said that body measurements and the laybone test are an infallible guide. The trapnest is the sure guide, just as the milk test rather than the capacious barrel and roomy udder is the sure test in judging dairy cows. The correlation is not a unity, but the value of body formation is so great that it deserves equal recog- nition with other points of conformation. After all, we cannot judge the whole bird. The viscera is entirely hidden from our view, and yet if those internal organs fail to perform their function, if because of faulty heart tissue the circulatory system fails in the assimilation and distribution of the digested food constituents, the bodily organism must fail and the bird die. Our judgment is limited to the somatic features and any part of the body which we can examine and which may have a relationship with the internal functioning of the animal should not be dismissed as unworthy of our attention. The heart, gizzard and intestines are hidden from view, yet we know that we want large vital organs, for if birds are to grow fast and lay with intensity, they must be equipped to digest large amounts of food quickly. Of course, we do not want a heart in a chicken as strong as the heart of a lion, for the single beat of such an organ would send blood rushing through the valves with such a pressure that it woulr; burst the arteries; but we do want internal strength proportionate with the life, necessary activity and designated purpose of the species. Selecting breeders for shape to produce heavy laying offspring. There is much that is invisible, particularly that which is carried in the invisible cells of the reproductive organs. Mendelism and the segrega- tion of characters have shown that birds are impure in some respects, even though we consider them as coming from a pure breeding strain and look upon the chickens of a single purebred flock as identical in composition. If the body and laybone tests are rejected, extensive breeding experiments must be carried on to determine which male carries the factor for high egg production and if a prepotent trans- mitter of that factor. Dr. Charles H. Woods, director of the Maine 66 THE AMERICAN BREEDS OF POULTRY Agricultural Experiment Station, at which Dr. Raymond Pearl did his notable breeding work, writes: The test always comes in the number of eggs that the pullet offspring produces. These records can be obtained only from trapnesting and recording accurately the records of the individual fowl. Hence, if the producing qualities of birds in a flock are known for a few years it is possible, with reasonable accuracy and correct analysis of the data, to obtain a knowledge of which birds carry the hereditary factors for egg production. There are, as you say, nine possible classes of males carrying the factor for high egg production or its allelomorph. These classes will not, of course, be in equal numbers. Only one of the classes will carry no factor for egg production, and only one of the classes will carry both factors for egg production, homogenous in the individual. All possible stages in between are, of course, possible. This condition respecting the Gametic construction of the germ cells, justifies the practical breeder in looking for some easily deter- mined, somatic test, such as body capacity and pelvic bone formation. Experience would seem to justify such a course. F. S. Tarbill, an ex- perienced breeder and judge writes: In a general way I have found the male to influence the egg-laying qualities of his pullets in quite a marked degree. In my own flock, you may remember the hen which was third at Peoria a year ago last winter. She was the mother of the first cock at the same show. Well, this hen was a remarkable layer. I trapped her for two months and she laid fifty-seven eggs during that period, and also kept right on all summer and fall. I mated her to her own cockerel, which, while a good exhibition bird, was of small capacity (one and one-half fingers) and quite heavy and crooked in bone. The pullets from this mating were comparatively poor layers ; although I did not trap them, I know that the flock average that year was poor as compared to the hen. Last season I mated these same pullets to a male that was extra large in capacity (four fingers) and with a thin, straight pelvic bone. My next-door neighbor has fourteen pullets from this mating. They are not selected, but just as they came, and they have laid as follows since the first of the year: January, 198 eggs; February, 250; March, 287, and up to the 13th of this month (April), 124. This is a flock average of about sixty percent — a quite perceptible increase over my pullets last year; but as figures are ladking for the one season, 'this may be of no. value to you. On this interesting subject, C. R. Baker, specialty breeder of Buff Plymouth Rocks, who has been a leading winner at the Chicago and New York shows, and who is a strong advocate of the body formation test, writes as follows: I have had several cases, two very distinct ones, where the males practically ruined the egg-laying efficiency of their pullets, the pullets' dams being good as layers themselves. Also, we have had decided improvements in pullets over their dams as layers when sired by a high-testing male. However, I cannot state definitely that either male or female outweighs the other in influencing the pullets' laying efficiency, when it comes to taking sex alone into consideration. I want them both good, and an exceedingly poor one of either sex is discarded, for it surely will pull down its mate, as we have demonstrated. The greater the prepotency and vitality of either specimen, as you are aware, combined with its egg-laying efficiency, the greater will be the degree to which its chicks will follow its tendencies. Body shape for meat production. When meat property is the desideratum, the body capacity should measure about four fingers from pelvis to end of keel, and the pelvic bones should be heavy with gristle and fat. Such a hen will lay on fat easily, and if she is to be kept in good breeding condition she should be fed sparingly and exercise