| ees Bra Litera L Lhe Creal Gialago 2 The vison I SMhe lnerwan Oler l Lhe Led Wolf Ihe hoala — Vader PL. Linuet fu ’ Zo aurtlard del 7 Tucker. S JZnomaleuis Mammalia 1.2.3.The Aye -dMye £56. Ihe Wombat Tucks ii’ 3 2 ao “Ss ? } ae ae lL Lagle witty a gradi Za 2 She Urubilinga » pr y 7 4 2 ? FL “ fhe Great Marpiy. 4 The Crested’ Lonegzbuzczarw. 4 / tee By , Lp Arrearage 7) Lh Laughing LALLOI . ‘ Ci S. Voll. 3 PLIV : = = Taf, 2 Laurilard del, Tucker .S ot de Lodargus . Zz Lpim achits magnificus . ) Philedon mrawachus F a? if 7UCW « Lmpelis . I The Ameruan Ostrich Caarne THE Le L B35} ANIMAL KINGDOM ARRANGED IN CONFORMITY WITH ITS ORGANIZATION, BY THE BARON CUVIER, PERPETUAL SECRETARY TO THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, ETC. ETC. ETC. THE CRUSTACEA, ARACHNIDES AND INSECTA, BY P. A. LATREILLE, MEMBER OF THE ROYAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, ETC. ETC: ETC. TRANSLATED FROM THE FRENCH, WITH NOTES AND ADDITIONS, BY H. M’MURTRIB, M.D. &c. &c. ed IN FOUR VOLUMES, WITH PLATES VOLUME IL. NEW YORK: Gi). €. JRC ARV ADE. MDCCCXXXI. Entered according to the act of congress, in the year one thousand eight hundred and thirty-one, by G. & C. & H. Carvill, in the clerk’s office of the southern district of New York, Philadelphia : Printed by James Kay, Jun. & Co. Printers to the American Philosophical Society. No. 4, Minor Street. REMARKS. In presenting to the Zoologist this production of the Aris- totle of the nineteenth century, the oracle of his science, it is far from my intention to occupy his time by attempting to show that it is not only the best source of knowledge to which he can refer, that of Nature herself alone excepted, but that it is the only one from which he can be certain of obtaining it unmingled with the grossest error—for this is universally admitted. Divesting himself of the prejudices arising from a blind re- verence for authority and a habit of imitation, our author has brought all the free energies of his powerful and penetrating mind to the investigation of his subject. Perceiving at once the importance of the difference between the constant and mutable characters of animals, aware of the harmony subsist- ing between one constant character and another, and unap- palled by the prospect of the almost endless labour that awaited him, he resolved to expose them with the knife; ex- pecting by the aid of comparative anatomy to arrive at facts which would enable him to arrange the whole animal king- dom, from Man to the last of the Infusoria, in its natural order. How well he has succeeded, the precision with which he has characterized insulated and mutilated fragments of fossil bones of extinct species, and the reconstruction of the whole of their gigantic frames from a part, this book, and the common consent of the learned of all countries, amply testify. He has accomplished the boast of Horace, he has erected the altars of the science in the temple of Truth, and placed its 1V REMARKS. everlasting foundations on the unchangeable organization of that economy it was his business to study: his monument is imperishable-—* Regalique situ pyramidum altius.”’ When the extent and nature of this work are taken into consideration, it will be readily surmised that my task has been far from an easy one; and a glance at the original is sufficient to convince the scientific critic that such is not only the case, but that the difliculties 1 have had to encounter were of no ordinary cast. The graceful flexibility of the French lan- guage is such as to yield to a combination of words and forms of expression that almost bid defiance to any thing like sy- nonymes in our more stubborn English. If this be true in relation to the language of conversation or that of books on or- dinary subjects, how greatly must the difliculty be increased when we find them abounding in a work like this! Such has been my trouble and perplexity on this account, that I may be excused for observing, that although the necessity for making new words cannot be denied, we should never forget that there are but two sources from which they can be legitimately drawn—the Latin or Greek. A word thus formed, being universally understood, may be removed unaltered from one language to another(1). Previously to commencing the execution of this version, it became indispensably requisite to fix upon some general plan of proceeding. The absurdity of translating into English the technical portion, or the nomenclature, was too apparent to demand a moment’s consideration—the genius of our language forbids it. ‘To have left these terms in French would have been inexpedient for self-evident reasons; and the idea of giving a class in Latin, an order in French, &e., presented too revolting a medley. By giving them all in Latin, the common language of science, these objections vanished, al- though it entailed difficulties of a different character. - I have ventured to encounter them; and while strictly adhering to (1) For some remarks on this'Subject, see Count Dejean’s preface to his Spe- cies, &c., I, p. 8. REMARKS. MY the spirit, and, as far as practicable, to the very letter of my author, have endeavoured to give to the whole work that classical ‘¢form and pressure” which facilitates its study and tends to fix its great and leading points more firmly in the memory. How far I have succeeded others must determine. I have not forgotten that although this work is more parti- cularly intended to be studied by the naturalist, it will proba- bly be read by every one who has the slightest desire to ac- quire some knowledge of the numerous and interesting groups of animals by which Man is surrounded, and with which he is so indissolubly connected. ‘The general reader will lose nothing by the concise and simple style I have endeavoured to adopt ; and although the meanings of the names aflixed to the various divisions are not placed in glaring characters at their head, he will always find it in the text. Whenever an animal is mentioned that is generally known by one and the same English, or vulgar name, I have always givenit; but of the many thousands here treated of, very few are thus circumstanced, and I cannot but think that it would be advantageous to the science if vulgar names were totally excluded from its nomenclature. The evidence of this is to be found in the fact, that, with comparatively few exceptions, these names vary, not only in different countries, but in dif- ferent parts of the same country. ‘Thus the Rockfish of Phila- delphia is a Striped-Bass at Boston; the Sheephead of Pitts- burg (a Corvina) is a totally different fish from the one so called in our city (a Sargus), and even belongs to a different family; the Trout we receive from Long Branch might with equal propriety be denominated a Shark ora Sturgeon. Different names are sometimes attached to the same animal, and the same name to different animals. Vulgar names are a fruitful source of error; and therefore I have employed them as spa- ringly and as cautiously as possible. An immaculate book is perhaps rather to be wished for than expected, and that errors should have crept into the Regne Animal is not at all surprizing. These I have endeavoured to correct, not by erasure or altering the text (those cases al- vi REMARKS. ways excepted where the mistake was evidently and purely typographical), but by a note, either on the page itself, or in the appendix. Thus, whatever has been added, nothing has been taken away, and the text of my author remains as J found it. It was originally my intention to have made considerable additions of American species to the Entomology, but to such an extent has the formation of new genera and the division of old ones lately been carried, that it would have required more time to do this correctly than to translate the whole book, and consequently I was compelled to abandon it. Of the Fishes of this country nothing can be said, until we are in possession of the expected work of M. Lesueur. The period in which America was compelled to look to Europe for a knowledge of her own productions has termi- nated; and our Wilson, Say, Ord, Le Conte, Harlan, Hentz, Audubon, &c. &c. are repaying the debt with usury. Nor is this spirit of observation abating. The increasing number of institutions exclusively devoted to the natural sciences, in almost every section of our extensive country, shows the re- verse to be the fact, and authorizes us to expect the most splendid results from their united efforts. I cannot conclude without acknowledging my obligations to Major Le Conte for his valuable communications on various portions of the Regne Animal. The results of his critical and laborious investigations are chiefly to be found in the notes on American birds, and the Catalogue which closes this volume, and I have only to regret that the unfinished state of the work on the Lepidoptera of North America, which is now being published at Paris by him and M. Boisduval, prevented me from employing it. H. M’MURTRIE. Philadelphia, June 1831. PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. Havine devoted myself from my earliest youth to the stu- dy of comparative anatomy, that is to the laws of the or- ganization of animals and of the modifications this organiza- tion undergoes in the various species, and having, for nearly thirty years since, consecrated to that science every moment of which my duties allowed me to dispose, the constant aim of my labours has been to reduce it to general rules, and to pro- positions which may contain their most simple expression. My first essays soon made me perceive, that I could only attain this in proportion as the animals, whose structure I should have to elucidate, were arranged in conformity with that structure, so that in one single name of class, order, genus, &c. might be embraced all those species which, in their ex- ternal as well as internal conformation, have affinities either more general or particular. Now this is what the greater number of naturalists of that epoch had never attempted, and what but few of them could have effected, had they ever been willing to try, since a similar arrangement presupposes an extensive knowledge of the structures, of which it is partly the representation. It is true, that Daubenton and Camper had given facts, that Pallas had indicated views: but the ideas of these learned men had not yet exercised upon their contemporaries the in- fluence they merited. The only general catalogue of animals then in existence, and the only one we possess even now, the system of Linnus, had just been disfigured by an unfortunate editor, who did not even take the pains to examine the prin- Vill PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. ciples of that ingenious methodist, and who, wherever he found any disorder, seems to have tried to render it more in- extricable. It is also true, that there were very extensive works upon particular classes, which had made known a great number of new species; but their authors merely considered the exter- nal relations of those species, and no one had employed him- self in arranging the classes and orders from the ensemble of the structure; the characters of several classes remained false or incomplete even in justly celebrated works of anatomy ; some of the orders were arbitrary, and in scarcely any of these divisions were the genera placed conformably to nature. I was compelled then, and the task occupied a considerable period of time, I was compelled to make anatomy and zoology, dissection and classification, the pioneers of my steps ; to search for better principles of distribution in my first remarks on or- ganization—to employ them in order to arrive at new ones, | and to render the distribution perfect—in fine, from this mu- tual reaction of the two sciences, to elicit a system of zoology that might serve as an introduction and a guide in anatomical investigations, and as a body of anatomical doctrine fitted to develope and explain the zoological system. The first results of this double labour appeared in 1795 in a special memoir upon a new division of the white blooded animals. A sketch of their application to genera and to their division in subgenera was the object of my elementary ‘‘’Ta- bleau Elémentaire des Animaux,” printed in 1798, which, in conjunction with M. Dumeril, I improved, in the tables an- nexed to the first volumes of my ‘¢Lecons d’Anatomie Com- parée” in 1800. T should, perhaps, have contented myself with perfecting these tables, and proceeded immediately to the publication of my great work on anatomy, if, in the course of my researches, 1 had not been frequently struck with another defect of the greater number of the general or partial systems of zoology; I mean the confusion in which the want of critical acumen has left a great number of species, and even several genera. PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. ix The classes and orders were not only not sufficiently con- formed to the intimate nature of animals to serve conve- niently as a basis to a treatise on comparative anatomy, but the genera themselves, although mostly better constituted, presented but inadequate resources, on account of the species not having been arranged under each of them, in conformity with these characters. Thus in placing the Sea-cow (Mana- tus, Cuv.) in the genus Morse (Trichechus, Lin.), the Siren in that of the Eels, Gmelin had rendered any general propo- sition relative to the organization of these two genera imposs- ible, just as by approximating to the same class the same order, and placing side by side the Sepia and the fresh- water Polypus, he had made it impossible to say any thing in general on the class and order which embraced such different beings. The examples above cited are selected from the most strik- ing of these errors ; but there existed an infinitude of them, less sensible at the first glance, which presented difliculties not less real. It was not enough then to have imagined a new arrange- ment of classes and orders, and to have properly placed the genera there; it was also necessary to examine all the species in order to be assured, whether they really belonged to the genera in which they had been placed. Having come to this, I found species not only grouped or dispersed, against all semblance of reason, but I remarked that several had not been positively determined; neither by the characters assigned to them, nor by their figures and de- scriptions. Here, one of them, by means of synonymes, represents seve- ral in one single name, and often so different from each other that they should not be placed in the same genus 3 there, a single one is doubled, trebled, and successively reappears in several subgenera, genera, and sometimes in different orders. What shall we say, for instance, of the Trichechus mana- tus of Gmelin, which in one single specific name comprises three species and two genera ; two genera, differing in almost Vou. I.—(2) xX PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. every thing? By what name shall we speak of the Velella, which figures there twice among the Medusz and once among the Holothurie ? How are we to bring together the Biphore ; some of which are called there Dagyse, the greater number Salpe, and several placed among the Holothuriz. In order, therefore, completely to attain the object, it was not suflicient to review the species—it was necessary to re- view their synonymes, or in other words to remodel the sys- tem of animals. Such an enterprise, from the prodigious development of the science in late years, could not have been executed com- pletely by any one individual, even supposing him to have no other employment and to live the longest possible term of years; had I been constrained to depend upon myself alone, I should not have been able to prepare even the simple sketch I now give; but the resources of my position seemed to me to supply what I wanted both of time and talent. Living in the midst of so many able naturalists—drawing from their works as fast as they appeared—enjoying the use of their collec- tions as freely as themselves—and having formed a very con- siderable one myself especially appropriated to my object; a great portion of my labour consisted merely in the employ- ment of so many rich materials. It was not possible, for in- stance, that much remained for me to do on shells studied by M. de Lamarck, or on quadrupeds described by M. Geoffroy. The numerous and new aflinities observed by M. de Lace- pede were so many traits for my system of fishes. Among so many beautiful birds, collected from all parts of the world, M. Le Vaillant perceived details of organization, which I im- mediately adapted to my plan. My own researches, employed and multiplied by other naturalists, yielded those fruits to me, which, in my hands alone, they would not, all, have produced. Thus, by examining, in the cabinet I have formed, the ana- tomical preparations on which I designed to found my division of reptiles, M. de Blainville and M. Oppel anticipated (and perhaps better than I could have done) results of which as yet I had but a glimpse, &€., &e. PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. ea Encouraged by these reflections, 1 determined to precede my treatise on comparative anatomy by a kind of abridged system of animals, in which I would present their divisions and subdivisions of all degrees, established in a parallel man- ner upon their structure, external and internal ; where I would give the indication of well ascertained species, which certainly belong to each of the subdivisions, and where, to create more interest, I would enter into some details upon such of those species, which from their abounding in our country, the uses to which we put them, the evils they cause us, the singularity of their habits and economy, their extraordinary forms, their beauty or their size, become the most remarkable. In so doing, I hoped to prove useful to young naturalists, who, for the most part, have but little idea of the confusion and errors of criticism in which the most accredited works abound, and who, in foreign countries particularly, do not sufficiently attend to the study of the true relations of the con- formation of beings; I considered myself as rendering a more direct service to those anatomists, who require to know be- forehand to what orders they should direct their researches, when they wish to solve any problem of human anatomy or physiology by comparative anatomy, but whose ordinary oc- cupations do not sufliciently prepare them for fulfilling this condition which is essential to their success. I had no intention, however, of extending this two-fold view to all the classes of the animal kingdom, and the Vertebrated animals, as in every sense the most interesting, naturally claimed a preference. Among the Invertebrata, I had to study more particularly the naked Mollusca and the great Zoophytes; but the innumerable variations of the external forms of shells and corals, the microscopic animals, and the other families whose part, on the great theatre of nature, is not very apparent, or whose organization affords but little room for the use of the scalpel, did not require a similar mi- nuteness of detail. Independently of this, so far as the shells and corals were concerned, I could depend on the work of xil PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. M. de Lamarck, in which will be found all that the most ar- dent thirst for knowledge can desire. As regards Insects, which, by their external form, organi- zation, habits, and influence on all animated nature, are so highly interesting, I have been fortunate enough to find assis- tance, which, in rendering my work infinitely more perfect than it could have possibly been had it emanated from my pen alone, has at the same time considerably accelerated its publica- tion. My friend and colleague M. Latreille, who has studied these animals more profoundly than any other man in Europe, has kindly consented to give, in a single volume, and nearly in the order adopted for the other parts, a summary of his immense researches, and an abridged description of those in- numerable genera entomologists are continually establishing. As for the rest, if in some places I have given less extent to the exposition of subgenera and species, all that relates to the superior divisions and the indicia of relations, I have founded on bases equally solid, by assiduous and universal re- searches. I have examined, one by one, all the species of which I could procure specimens; I have approximated those which merely differed from each other in size, colour, or in the number of some parts of little importance, and have formed them into what I denominate subgenera. Every time it was possible, I dissected one species at least of each subgenus, and if those be excepted to which the scalpel cannot be applied, but very few groups of this degree can be found in my work, of which I cannot produce some considerable portion of the organs. Having determined the names of the species I observed, which had been previously either well described or well figured, I placed in the same subgenera those I had not seen, but whose exact figures, or descriptions, sufliciently precise to leave no doubt remaining as to their natural rela- tions, I found in authors; but I have passed over in silence that great number of vague indications, on which, in my opi- nion, naturalists have been too eager to establish species, PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. xill whose adoption is what has mainly contributed to introduce in the catalogue of beings, that confusion which deprives it of so great a portion of its utility. I could, every where, have added great numbers of new species, but. as I could not refer to figures it would in that case have been necessary to extend their descriptions beyond the bounds of my limits; I have preferred therefore depriv- ing my work of that ornament, and have indicated those only whose singular formation gives origin to new subgenera. My subgenera once established on undoubted relations, and composed of well ascertained species, nothing remained but to construct this great scaffolding of genera, tribes, families, ‘orders, classes and divisions which constitute the ensemble of the animal kingdom. Here I have proceeded, partly by ascending from the in- ferior to the superior divisions, by means of approximation and comparison, and partly by descending from the superior to the inferior divisions, on the principle of the subordination of characters; carefully comparing the results of the two methods, verifying one by the other, and always sedulously establishing the correspondence of forms, external and inter- nal, both of which constitute integral parts of the essence of each animal. Such has been my mode of proceeding whenever it was ne- cessary and possible to form new arrangements; but I need not observe, that in many places, the results to which it would have conducted me, had been already so satisfactorily obtained, that no other trouble was left to me than that of following the track of my predecessors. Even in these cases, however, by new observations I have confirmed and verified what was previously acknowledged, and what I did not adopt until it was subjected to a rigorous scrutiny. An idea of this mode of examination may be obtained from the Memoirs on the ana- tomy of the Mollusca which have appeared in the ‘* Annales du Muséum,” and of which I am now preparing a separate and augmented collection. I venture to assure the reader, that the labour I have bestowed upon the Vertebrated animals, XIV PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. the Annulata, the Radiata, and many of the Insects and Crus- tacea, is equally extensive. I have not deemed it necess- ary to publish it with the same detail; but all my prepara- tions are exposed in the Cabinet of Comparative Anatomy in the Jardin du Roi, and will serve hereafter for my Treatise on Anatomy. Another work of considerable labour, but whose proofs cannot be made so authentic, is the critical examination of species. I examined and verified all the figures adduced by authors, and as often as possible referred each to its true spe- cies, before making a choice of those I have pointed out; it is from this verification alone, and never from the classification of preceding methodists, that I have referred to my sub- genera the species that belong to them. Such is the reason, why no astonishment should be experienced on finding that such or such a genus of Gmelin is now divided and distributed even in different classes and divisions; that numerous nominal species are reduced to a single one, and that vulgar names are very differently applied. There is not a single one of these changes that I am not prepared to justify, or of which the reader himself may not obtain the proof by recurring to the sources I have indicated. In order to diminish his trouble, I have been careful to se- lect for each class a principal author, generally the richest in good original figures, and I quote secondary works only in those cases in which the former are silent, or where it was useful to establish some comparison, for the sake of confirm- ing synonymes. My subject could have been made to fill many volumes; but I considered it my duty to condense it, by imagining abridged means of publication. I have obtained these by gra- duated generalities; by never repeating for a species what could be said of a whole subgenus, nor for a genus what might be applied to an entire order, and so on, we arrive at the greatest possible economy of words. ‘To this my endeavours have been, above all, particularly directed, inasmuch as this was the principal end of my work. It may be observed, PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. XV however, that I have not employed many technical terms, and that I have endeavoured to communicate my ideas with- out that barbarous apparatus of factitious words, which, in the works of so many modern naturalists, prove so very re- pulsive. I cannot perceive, however, that I have thereby lost any thing in precision or clearness. I have been compelled, unfortunately, to introduce many new names, although I endeavoured as far as possible to pre- serve those of my predecessors; but the numerous subgenera I have established required these denominations ; for in things so various the memory is not satisfied with numerical indica- tions. I have selected them, so as either to convey some character, or among the common names which I have latinized, or finally after the example of Linnzus, from those of mytho- logy, which are generally agreeable to the ear, and which we are far from having exhausted. In naming species, however, I would recommend employ- ing the substantive of the genus, and the trivial name only. The names of the subgenera are designed as a mere relief to the memory, when we wish to indicate these subdivisions in particular. Otherwise, as the subgenera, already very nu- merous, will in the end become greatly multiplied, in con- sequence of having substantives continually to retain, we shall be in danger of losing the advantages of that binary nomen- clature so happily imagined by Linneus. It is the better to preserve it that I have dismembered, as little as possible, the genera of that illustrious reformer of science. Whenever the subgenera in which I divide them were not to be translated to different families, I have left them together under their former generic appellation. This was not only due to the memory of Linnzeus, but it was ne- cessary in order to preserve the mutual intelligence of the naturalists of different countries. The habit, naturally acquired in the study of natural his- tory, of the mental classification of a great number of ideas, is one of the advantages of that science that is seldom observed, and which, when it shall have been generally introduced into XVi PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. the system of common education, will become, perhaps, the principal one. By it, the student is exercised in that part of logic which is termed method, just as he is by geometry in that of syllogism, because natural history is the science which requires the most precise methods, as geometry is that which demands the most rigorous reasoning. Now this art of me- thod, once well acquired, may be applied with ‘nfinite advan- tage to studies the most foreign to natural history. Every dis- cussion which supposes a classification of facts, every research which demands a distribution of matters, is performed accord- ing to the same laws; and he who had cultivated this science merely for amusement, is surprised at the facilities it affords him in disentangling and arranging all kinds of affairs. It is not less useful in solitude. Sufliciently extensive to satisfy the most powerful mind, sufficiently various and inte- resting to calm the most agitated soul, it sheds consolation in the bosom of the unhappy, and stills the angry waves of envy and hatred. Once elevated to the contemplation of that har- mony of nature irresistibly regulated by Providence, how weak and trivial appear those causes which it has been pleased to leave dependent on the will of man! How astonishing to be- hold so many fine minds, consuming themselves so uselessly for their own happiness or that of others, in the pursuit of vain combinations, whose very traces a few years suflice to sweep away. I avow it—these ideas have always been present to my mind, the companions of my labours; and if I have endeavoured by every means in my power to advance this peaceful study, it is because, in my opinion, it is more capable than any other of supplying that want of occupation, which has so largely con- tributed to the troubles of our age—but I must return to my subject. : There yet remains the task of accounting for the principal changes I have effected in the latest received methods, and to acknowledge the amount of my obligations to those natu- ralists, whose works have furnished or suggested a part of them. -PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. XVil To anticipate a remark which will naturally present itself to many, I must observe that I have neither desired nor pre- tended to class animals so as to form one single line, or so as to mark their relative superiority. I even consider every at- tempt of this kind impracticable. Thus, I do not mean that the Mammalia or Birds which come last, are the most imper- fect of their class; still less do I believe that the last of the Mammalia are more perfect than the first of the Birds, the last of the Mollusca more so than the first of the Annulata or of the Radiata, even restraining the meaning of this vague word perfect to that of most completely organized. I re- gard my divisions and subdivisions as the merely graduated expression of the resemblance of the beings which enter into each of them, and although in some we observe a sort of de- gradation or passage from one species to the other, which can- not be denied, this disposition is far from being general. The pretended chain of beings, as applied to the whole creation, is but an erroneous application of those partial observations, which are only true when confined to the limits within which they were made—it has, in my opinion, proved. more detri- mental to the progress of natural history in modern times, than it is easy to imagine. It is in conformity with these views that I have established my four general divisions, which have already been made known in a separate Memoir. [I still think it expresses the real relations of animals more exactly than the old arrange- ment of Vertebrata and Invertebrata, for the simple reason, that the former animals have a much greater resemblance to each other than to the latter, and that it was necessary to mark this difference in the extent of their relations. M. Virey, in an article of the “‘ Nouveau Dictionnaire d’ His- toire Naturelle,” had already discovered a part of the basis of this division, and principally that which reposes on the ner- vous system. The particular approximation of oviparous Vertebrata, in- ter se, originated from the curious observations of M. Geoff- roy on the composition of bony heads; and from those I have Vor. I.—(3) XVill PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. added to them, relative to the rest of the skeleton and to the muscles. , In the Mammalia I have brought back the Solipedes to the Pachydermata, and have divided the latter into families on a new plan; the Ruminantia I have placed after the Quadru- peds, and the Sea-cow near the Cetacea. ‘The arrangement of the Carnaria I have somewhat altered—the Ouistites have been wholly separated from the Monkeys, and a sort of pa- rallelism between the pouched animals and other digitated Mammalia indicated ; the whole from my own anatomical re- searches. All that I have given on the Quadrumana and the - Bats is based on the recent and profound labours of my friend M. Geoffroy de Saint-Hilaire. ‘The researches of my bro- ther, M. Frederick Cuvier, on the teeth of the Carnaria and the Rodentia, have proved highly useful to me in forming the subgenera of these two orders. Notwithstanding the genera of the late M. Illiger are but the results of these same studies, and those of some foreign naturalists, I have adopted his names whenever my subgenera could be placed in his genera. I have also adopted M. de Lacépéde’s excellent divisions of this description, but the characters of all the degrees and all the indications of species have been taken from nature, either in the cabinet of anatomy, or the galleries of the Museum. The same plan was pursued with respect to the Birds. I have examined with the greatest care and attention more than four thousand individuals in the Museum ; I arranged them agreeably to my views in the public gallery more than five years ago, and all that is said of this class has been drawn from that source. Thus, any resemblance which my subdivisions may bear to some recent descriptions is on my side purely accidental(1). (1) This observation not having been sufficiently understood abroad, Iam com- pelled to repeat it here, and openly to declare a fact witnessed by thousands in Paris—it is this, that all the birds in the public gallery of the Museum were named and arranged according to my system in 1811. Even such of my subdivisions as I had not yet named were marked by particular signs. This is my date. In- PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. xix Naturalists, I hope, will approve of the numerous subgenera I have deemed it necessary to establish among the Birds of Prey, Passerine, and Shore-Birds; they appear to me to have completely elucidated genera hitherto involved in much con- fusion. J have also marked, as exactly as I could, the corres- pondence of these subdivisions with the genera of MM. de La- cépede, Meyer, Wolf, Temminck, Savigny, and have refer- red to each of them all the species of which I could obtain a very positive knowledge. ‘This laborious work will prove of value to those who may hereafter attempt a true history of Birds. The splendid works on Ornithology published within a few years, and those chiefly of M. Le. Vaillant, which are filled with so many interesting observations, together with M. Vieillot’s, have been of much assistance to me in designating with precision the species they represent. The general division of this class remains as I published it in 1798 in my “ Tableau Elémentaire(1).” The general division of Reptiles, by my friend M. Brong- niart, I have thought proper to preserve, but I have prose- cuted very extensive and laborious anatomical investigations to obtain my ulterior subdivisions. M. Oppel, as I have al- ready stated, has partly taken advantage of these preparatory labours, and whenever my genera finally agreed with his, I have noticed the fact. ‘The work of Daudin, indifferent as it is, has been useful to me for indications of details, but the par- ticular divisions I have made in the genera Monitor and Gecko, are the product of my own observations on a great number of Reptiles recently brought to the Museum by Messrs Peron and Geoflroy. My labours with regard to the Fishes will probably be found to exceed those I have bestowed on the other vertebrated dependently of this, my first volume was printed in the beginning of 1816. Four volumes are not printed as quickly asa pamphlet ofa few pages. I say no more. (Note to Ed. 1829.) 4 (1) I only mention this, because an amiable naturalist, M. Vieillot, ina recent work has attributed to himself the union of the Picw with the Passeres. Ihad published it in 1798, with my other arrangements, so as to render them public in the Museum since 1811 and 1812. KX PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. animals. Since the publication of the celebrated work of M. de Lacépeéde, the accession to our Museum of a great number of fishes, has enabled me to add several subdivisions to those of that learned naturalist, to form different combinations of several species, and to multiply anatomical observations. I have also had better means of verifying the species of Commerson and of some other travellers, and on this point I owe much toa re- view of the drawings of Commerson and of the dried fishes he brought with him, by M. Dumeril, which have been but very lately recovered: resources to which I added those pre- sented to me in the fishes brought by Peron from the Indian Ocean and Archipelago; those which I collected in the Medi- terranean, and the collections made on the coast of Coroman- del by the late M. Sonnerat, at the Isle of France by M. Ma- thieu, in the Nile and Red Sea by M. Geoffroy, &c. I was thus enabled to verify most of the species of Bloch, Russel, and others, and to have prepared the skeletons and viscera of nearly all the subgenera, so that this portion of the work will, I presume, present to icthyologists much that is new. As to my division of this class, I confess its inconvenience, but I still think it more natural than any preceding one. When I first published it, I gave it, quantum valeat, and if any one discovers a better principle of division, and as conformable to the organization, I shall hasten to adopt it. It is well known that all the works, on the general division of the Invertebrated animals, are mere modifications of what I proposed in 1795 in the first of my memoirs; and the time and care I have devoted to the anatomy of the Mollusca in ge- neral, and principally to the naked Mollusca, are equally so. The determining of this class, as well as of its divisions and subdivisions, rests on my observations; the magnificent work of M. Poli had alone anticipated me by descriptions and anatomical researches, useful to me it is true, but confined to bivalves and multivalves only. I have verified all the facts furnished to me by that able anatomist, and I have, I think, more justly marked the functions of some organs. I have also endeavoured to determine the animals to which the principal PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. XXI forms of shells belong, and to arrange the latter from that con- siderations; but as to the ulterior divisions of those shells whose animals resemble each other, I have examined them only so . far as to enable me to describe those admitted by Messrs de Lamarck and de Montfort; even the small number of genera or subgenera which are properly mine, are derived from observa- tions on the animals. Inciting examples I have confined my- self to a certain number of the species of Martini, Chemnitz, Lister, and that only (the volume of M. de Lamarck, which is to contain these matters, not being published), because I was compelled to fix the attention of the reader on specific objects. In the selection and determining of these species however I lay no claim to the same critical accuracy I have employed for the Vertebrated animals and the naked Mol- lusca. The excellent observations of Messrs Savigny, Lesueur, and Desmarest on the compound Ascidia, approximate the latter family of the Mollusca to certain orders of Zoophytes— a curious relation, and an additional proof of the impractica- bility of arranging animals on one single line. The Annulata. (the establishing of which order, although not the name, belongs de facto to me) have I think been ex- tricated from the confusion in which they had hitherto been involved among the Mollusca, the Testacea, and the Zoophy- tes, and placed in their natural order—even their genera have been elucidated only by my observations on them, published in the ‘¢ Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles,”’ and elsewhere. I can say nothing relative to the three classes contained in the third volume. M. Latreille, who, with the exception of some anatomical details, founded on my own observations and - those of M. Randohr, added to his ee is its sole author, will spare me that trouble. As to the Zoophytes, which terminate the animal kingdom, I have availed myself, for the Echinodermata, of the late work of M. de Lamarck, and for the Intestinal Worms, of that of M. Rudolphi, entitled Zntozoa; but I have anatomized all the genera, some of which have been determined by me only. Xxll PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION. Besides this, there is an excellent work of M. Tiedemann on the anatomy of the Echinodermata that received the prize of the Institute some years ago, that will shortly appear—it will leave nothing unsaid with respect to these curious animals. The Corals and the Infusoria, allowing no field for anatomical investigations, have been briefly disposed of. ‘The new work of M. de Lamarck will supply my deficiencies(1). With respect to authors, I can only mention, here, those who have furnished me with general views, or who were the origin of such in my own mind(2). There are many others to whom I am indebted for particular facts, whose names I have carefully quoted wherever I have made use of them. They will be found on every page of my book. Should I have omitted to do justice to any, it must be attributed to in- voluntary forgetfulness—no property, in my eyes, is more sacred than the conceptions of the mind, and the custom, too common among naturalists, of making plagiarisms by a change of names, has always appeared to me a crime. The publication of my Comparative Anatomy will now occupy me every moment; the materials are ready, great quantities of preparations and drawings are finished and ar- ranged ; and I shall be careful in dividing the work into parts, each of which will form a whole, so that should my physical powers prove insuflicient for the completion of the totality of my plan, what I shall have produced will still form entire suites, and the materials I have collected be ready for the hand of him who may undertake the continuation of my la- bours. Jardin du Roti, 1816. (1) I have this moment received, /’ Histoire des Polypiers coralligéenes flexibles of M. Lamouroux, which furnishes an excellent supplement to M. Lamarck. (2) M. de Blainville has recently published general zoological tables, which I regret came too late for me to profit by; having appeared when my book was nearly printed. PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. THE preceding preface exhibits a faithful account of the state in which I found the history of animals at the time the first edition of this work was published. During the twelve years that have since elapsed, this science has made immense progress. The labours of numerous, courageous, and learned travellers, who have explored every region of the globe, the rich collections formed and rendered public by various go- vernments, the profound and splendid works where new species are described and figured, and whose authors have been determined to detect their mutual relations and to con- sider them in every light(1), have all been instrumental in producing this result. I have endeavoured to avail myself of these discoveries, as far as my plan permitted, by first studying the innumerable specimens received at the Cabinet du Roi, and comparing them with those which served as the basis of my first edition, in order to deduce thence new approximations or new subdi- visions, and then by searching in all the books I could pro- cure for the genera or subgenera established by naturalists, and the description of species by which they have supported these different combinations. The study of synonymes has become much easier now than it was at the period of my first edition. Both French and (1) See my Discourse before the Institute on the “ Progrés de l’Histoire Natu- relle depuis la paix maritime,” published in the third volume of my “ Eloges.” XX1V PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. foreign naturalists seem to have felt the necessity of establish- ing divisions in those immense genera, in which such incon- gruous species were formerly heaped together ; their groups are now precise and well defined, their descriptions sufliciently detailed, their figures scrupulously exact even to the most minute characters, and very frequently of the greatest beauty. Scarcely any difficulty remains therefore in determining the identity of their species, and nothing hinders them from com- ing to an understanding with respect to the nomenclature. This, unfortunately, has been almost neglected ; the names of the same genera, the same species, are multiplied as often as they are spoken of; and should this discord continue, the same chaos will be produced that previously existed, though arising from a different cause. | I have used every effort to compare and approximate these redundancies, and forgetting even my own little interest of author, have often given names which seem to have been form- ed expressly to avoid being compelled to avow the borrowing of my divisions. But in order thoroughly to execute this un- dertaking, this pinax of the animal kingdom, which becomes daily more and more necessary, to examine its proofs, and to fix on the definite nomenclature that would be adopted, by basing it on sufficient figures and descriptions, requires more space than I can dispose of, and a time imperiously claimed by other works. It is in the ‘‘ History of Fishes,’’ which, assisted by M. Valenciennes, I have commenced publishing, that I intend to give an idea of what I think might be effected with respect to all parts of the science. This is a mere abridgement, a simple sketch—fortunate will I be if I succeed in rendering it correct in all its parts. Various descriptions of a similar kind have been published on some of the classes, and I have carefully studied them all, in order to perfect my own. The «‘ Mammalogie’’ of M. Desma- rest, that of M. Lesson, the ‘‘ Traité sur les Dents des Qua- drupedes” of M. Frederick Cuvier, the English translation of my first edition by Mr Griffith enriched by numerous additions ~ chiefly by Hamilton Smith, the new edition of the ‘« Ma- PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. XXKV nuel d’Ornithomalogie”’ of M. Temminck, the ‘¢ Ornithological Fragments” of M. Wagler, the ‘‘Description of Reptiles” by the late Merrem, and the dissertation on the same subject by M. Fitzinger, were principally useful to me for the Vertebrated animals. The ‘Histoire des Animaux sans Vertebres” of M. de Lamarck, and the ‘‘ Malacologie” of M. de Blainville, were also of great use to me for the Mollusca. To these I have added the new views and facts contained in the numerous and learned writings of Messrs Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, father and son, Savigny, Temminck, Lichtenstein, Kuhl, Wilson, Hors- field, Vigors, Swainson, Gray, Ord, Say, Harlan, Charles Bo- naparte, Lamouroux, Mitchell, Lesueur, and many other able and studious men, whose names will be carefully mentioned, wherever I speak of the subjects they have described. The fine collection of engravings which have appeared within the last twelve years, have allowed me to indicate a greater number of species, nor have I failed to make ample use of the opportunity. I must particularly acknowledge what I owe on this score, to the ‘* Histoire des Mammiferes” of MM. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire and Frederick Cuvier, the ‘‘ Planches Coloriées’’ of Messrs Temminck and Laugier, the ‘‘ Galerie des Oiseaux” of M. Vieillot, the new edition of the ‘‘ Oiseaux d’ Al- lemagne” of M. Nauman, the Birds of the United States of Messrs Wilson, Ord, and Charles Bonaparte(1), the great works of M. Spix and of the prince Maximilian de Wied on the animals of Brazil, and to those of M. Ferussac on the Mol- lusca. The plates and zoological descriptions of the travels of Messrs Freycinet and Duperrey, given in the first by Messrs Quoy and Gaymard, and in the second by Messrs Lesson and Garnot, present, also, many new objects. ‘The same should be said of the animals of Java, by M. Horsfield.. Though ona smaller scale, new figures of rare species are to be found in the “¢ Memoires du Muséum,” in the ‘¢ Annales des Sciences Natu- relles,” in the different dictionaries of the natural sciences, in - (1) The work of M. Audubon upon the Birds of North America, which sur- passes all others in magnificence, was unknown to me till after the whole of that part which treats of birds was printed. Vou. I.—(4) XXV1 PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION. the Zoological Illustrations of M. Swainson, and in the Zoolo- gical Journal published by able naturalists in London. The Journals of the Lyceum of New York, and of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, are not less precious; but in proportion as the taste for natural history becomes extended, and the more numerous the countries in which it is cultivated, the number of its acquisitions increase in geometrical pro- gression, and it becomes more and more difficult to collect all the writings of naturalists, and to complete the table of their results; I rely therefore on the indulgence of those whose ob- servations may have escaped me, or whose works I may not have sufficiently studied. My celebrated friend and colleague M. Latreille, as in the first edition, having consented to take upon himself the im- portant and diflicult subject of the Crustacea, Arachnides and Insects, will himself point out the path he has pursued; so that on these points I need say nothing more here. Jardin du Roi, October 1828, SYSTEMATIC INDEX. INTRODUCTION Of natural history Of living beings and or- ganization in general Division of organized be- ings into animals and vegetables Of the forms peculiar to the organic elements of the animal body, and of the principal com- binations of its chemi- cal elements Of the forces which act in the animal body Summary idea of the func- tions and organs of the bodies of animals, and of their various degrees of complication Of the intellectual func- tions of animals Of method as applied to the animal kingdom Distribution of the ani- mal kingdom into four great divisions OF THE VERTEBRATA IN GENERAL Subdivision of the Verte- brata into four classes MAMMALIA Orders of the Mammalia BIMANA Man Peculiar conforma- tion of Man Physical and moral development of Man 11 13 16 A8 Varieties of the hu- man species QUADRUMANA Simia Simia proper Pithecus Hilobates Cercopithecus Semnopithecus Macacus Tnuus Cynocephalus Mandrills Monkeys of America Sapajous Mycetes Ateles Lagothrix Sajous Sainiri Sakis Callithrix Nocthora Ouistitis Midas Lemur Lemur proper Indris Loris Galago Tarsius CARNARIA CHEIROPTERA Vespertilio = - Pteropus Cephalotes Vespertilio proper Molossus Dinops Nyctinomus Noctilio Phyllostoma Megaderma Rhinolophus Nycteris Rhinopoma XXVill SYSTEMATIC INDEX. Taphozous Mormoops Vespertilio Plecotus Nycticeus Galeopithecus INSECTIVORA Erinaceus Centenes Cladobates Sorex Mygale Chrysochloris Talpa Condylura Scalops CARNIVORA PLANTIGRADA Ursus Procyon Ailurus E Ictides Nasua Meles Gulo Ratelus DIGITIGRADA Mustela Putorius Mustela proper Mephitis Lutra Canis Canis proper Foxes Megalotis Viverra Viverra proper Genetta Paradoxurus Mangusta Ryzena Crossarchus Proteles Hyena Felis AMPHIBIA. | Phoca Phoca proper Stenorhynchus Pelagus Stemmatopus Macrorhinus Otaries Trichechus MARSUPIALIA Didelphis Didelphis proper 82 Chironectes 3% Dasyurus 3 Thylacinus 84 Phascogale 84 Dasyurus proper 84 Perameles 85 , Phalangista 85 Phalangista proper 86 Petaurus Hypsiprymnus 87 Ypsipry 87 Macropus 88 Koala Phascolomys 89 y 90 RODENTIA 9] Sciurus 91 Sciurus proper > Pteromys a Cheiromys oe Mus md Arctomys 95 Spermophilus 96 Myoxus 96 Echimys 97 Hydromys ae Capromys 99 Mus proper 99 Gerbillus Meriones 99 Cricetus 99 Arvicola 100 Fiber 102 Arvicola 103 Georychus 104 Otomys 105 - Dipus 107 Helamys nue Spalax ce Bathyergus 109 Geomys 110 Diplostoma 111 Castor 111 Myopotamus tae Hystrix Hystrix proper 112 Atherurus 113 Eretison 117 Synetheres 118 Lepus 118 Lepus proper 119) |] Lagomys 120 Hydrochzrus 120 Cavia 120 Kerodon 120 Chloromys 121 Celogenys 122 EDENTATA 124 TARDIGRADA 125 Bradypus 148 148 149 150 151 151 153 153 153 154 154 154 154 155 156 157 157 157 158 158 159 & 159 160 | SYSTEMATIC INDEX. Acheus 160 Bradypus 161 Megatherium 162 Megalonyx 162 EDENTATA ORDINARIA 162 Dasypus 162 Cachicamus 163 Apara 165 Encoubertus 163 Cabassous 164 Priodon 164 Clamyphorus 164 Orycteropus 165 Myrmecophaga 165 Manis 166 MonoTREMATA 167 Echidna 168 Ornithorhynchus 168 PACHYDERMATA 169 PROBOSCIDIANA 170 Elephas 171 Mastodon Li2 PACHYDERMATA ORDI- NARIA 173 Hippopotamus 173 Sus 174 Sus proper 174 Phacocherus 175 Dicotyles 175 Anoplotherium 176 Rhinoceros 177 Hyrax 178 Paleotherium 178 Lophiodon 179 Tapir 179 SOLIPEDES 180 Equus 180 RUMINANTIA 182 Without Horns. : Camelus 184 Camelus proper 184 Auchenia 185 Moschus 185 With Horns. Cervus 187 Camelopardalis 190 Antilope 191 Capra 198 Ovis 199 : Bos 200 CETACEA 202 HERBIVORA 203 Manatus 203 Halicore 204 Stellerus 204 ORDINARIA 204 XX1X Delphinus 206 Delphinus proper 206 Phocena 207 Delphinapte- rus * 209 Hyperoodon 209 Monodon 210 Physeter Pa Physeter 212 Balena DAD: Balenoptera 214 Oviparous Vertebrata 215 AVES 217 ACCIPITRES 225 DIURN ZB 225 Vultur 226 Vultur proper 226 Cathartes 227 Percnopterus 228 Gypactos 229 Falco 229 Nobiles ; 230 Falco proper 230 Hierofalco 219 Ignobiles 233 Aquila 233 Aquila proper 233 Haliztus 235 Pandion 236 Circaetus 236 Harpyia 237 Morphnus 238 Cymindis 239 Astur 239 Asturproper 239 Nisus 240 Milvus 241 Milvus proper 241 Pernis 242 Buteo 242 Circus 243 Serpentarius 244, NOCTURNE 245 Strix 245 Otus 246 Ulula 247 Strix 247 Syrnium 247 Bubo 248 Noctua 248 Scops 250 PASSERINZ 251 DENTIROSTRES 252 Lanius 252 Lanius proper 252 Vanga 255 / Ocypterus 255 Barita 256 Chalybzus 256 XXX SYSTEMATIC INDEX. Psaris 256 Graucalus 257 Bethylus 257 Falcunculus 257 Pardalotus 258 Muscicapa 258 Tyrannus 258 Muscipeta 259 Platyrhynchus 259 Muscicapa 260 Gymnocephalus 261 Chephalopterus 262 Ampelis 262 Ampelis 262 Tersina 263 Ceblepyris 263 Bombycilla 263 Procnias 264. Procnias pro- per 264, Casmarhyn- chus 264 Gymnoderus 264 Edolius 265 Phibalura 265 Tanagra 265 Bulfinch Tanagers 266 Grossbeak Tanagers 266 Tanagra proper 266 Oriole Tanagers 266 Cardinal Tanagers 266 Ramphoceline Tana- gers 267 Turdus 267 Turdus proper 267 Grives 268 Lamprotornis 270 Turdoides 270 Grallines 270 Criniger 270 Myothera 270 Orthonyx 272 Cinclus 272 Philedon 273 Eulabes 274 Gracula___ 274 Manorhina 276 Pyrrhocorax 276 Oriolus 276 Gymnops 277 Menura 277 Motacilla 278 Saxicola 278 Sylvia 279 Curruca 279 Accentor 282 Regulus 283 Troglodytes 284 Motacilla 284. Motacilla pro- per 284 Budytes Anthus Pipra Rupicola Calyptomenes Pipra proper Eurylaimus FISSIROSTRES Hirundo Cypselus Hirundo proper Caprimulgus Podargus CONIROSTRES Alauda Parus Parus proper - Bearded Titmouse Remiz Emberiza Fringilla Ploceus Pyrgita Fringilla Carduelis Linaria Vidua Coccothraustes Pitylus Pyrrhula Loxia Corythus Colius Buphaga Cassicus Cassicus proper Icterus Xanthornus Oxyrhynchus Dacnis Sturnus Corvus Corvus proper Pica Garrulus Caryocatactes Temia Glaucopis Coracias Coracias proper Colaris Paradisza TENUIROSTRES Sitta Xenops Anabates Synallaxis Certhia Certhia proper 311 311 313 313 314 314 314 314 SYSTEMATIC INDEX. Dendrocolaptes 315 Tichodroma STS Nectarinia 316 Diceum 316 Melithreptus 317 Cinnyris 317 Arachnothera 318 Trochilus 318 Trochilus proper 319 Orthorhynchus 319 Upupa 320 Fregilus 320 Upupa proper 321 Promerops 321 Epimachus 322 SYNDACTYLZE 323 Merops ; $23 Prionites 324 Alcedo». 324 Ceyx 325 Todus 325 Buceros . 326 SCANSORIA 327 Galbula 327 Galbula proper 327 Jacamerops 328 Picus 328 Picoides 330 Yunx 331 Cuculus 331 Cuculus proper 332 Couas 333 Centropus 333 Courols 333 Indicator 334 Barbacous 334 Malcoha 334 Scythrops 334 Bucco 335 Barbicans 335 Bucco proper 335 Tamatia 33 Trogon 336 Crotophaga 337 Ramphastos 337 Ramphastos proper 338 Pteroglossus 338 Psittacus 338 Ara 359 Cornurus 339 Cockatoos 340 Psittacus proper 340 Loris 341 Psittaculus 341 Péroquets a trompe 342 Pezoporus 342 Corythaix 343 Musophaga 343 / xd GALLINACEA 343 Alector 344 Alector proper 345 Ourax 345 Penelope 346 Ortalida 347 Opisthocomus 347 Pavo 347 Lophophorus 348 Meleagris 349 Numida 349 Phasianus 350 Gallus 350 Phasianus proper 351 Houppiferes 352 Tragopan 352 Cryptonyx 352 Tetrao 353 Tetrao proper 353 Lagopus 355 Ganga 3535 Perdix 356 Francolinus 356 Perdix proper 356 Coturnix 357 Tridactylus 358 Turnix 358 Syrrhaptes 358 Tinamus 359 Columba 359 Columbi-gallines 360 Columba proper 360 Vinago 362 GRALLATORIA 363 BREVIPENNES 363 Struthio 364 Casuarius 365 PRESSIROSTRES 366 Otis 367 Charadrius 368 C2dicnemus 368 Charadrius proper 368 Vanellus 369 Squatarola 370 Vanellus proper 370 Hematopus 371 Cursorius 371 Cariama 372 CULTIROSTRES 372 Grus 373 Psophia 373 Grus proper 374 Eurypyga 375 Cancroma 375 Ardea 376 Ardea proper 376 Crabeaters 7 376 Onores SY / XXXI1 SYSTEMATIC INDEX. Egrets Bitterns Night Herons Ciconia Mycteria Scopus Hians Dromas Tantalus Platalea LONGIROSTRES Scolopax Ibis Numenius Scolopax proper Rhynchea Limosa Calidris Arenaria Pelidna Cocorli Falcinellus Machetes Eurinorhynchus Phalaropus Strepsilas Totanus Lobipes Himantopus Recurvirostra MACRODACTYLI Jacana Palamedea Chauna Megapodius Rallus Fulica Gallinula Porphyrio Fulica proper Chionis Glareola Pheenicopterus PALMIPEDES BRACHYPTERZ Colymbus 377 377 378 378. 379 -380 380 380 381 381 382 383 383 384 385 386 387 387 388 388 389 389 389 390 390 391 391 393 393 394 394 395 Podiceps 405 Heliornis 404. Mergus 404 , Uria 405 Cephus 405 Alca 406 Fratercula 406 Alea proper 406 Aptenodytes 407 Aptenodytes proper 407 Catarrhactes 407 Spheniscus 408 LONGIPENNES 408 Procellaria 408 - Procellaria proper 409 Puffinus 410 Halodroma 410 Pachyptila 410 Diomedea All Larus 411 Goelands 412 Mauves 412 Stercorarius 413 Sterna 413 Noddies 415 Rynchops ALS _ TOTIPALMATZE 415 Pelecanus 416 Pelecanus proper 416 Phalacrocorax 416 Tachypetes 417 Sula 417 Plotus 418 Pheton 418 LAMELLIROSTRES 419 Anas 419 Cygnus 419 Anser 421 Anser proper 421 Bernacles 421 Cereopsis 421 Anas proper 422 Oidemia 423 Clangula 423 Somateria 424 Rynchaspis 426 Tadorna 426 Mergus 428 ia i a 4 INTRODUCTION. As correct ideas respecting natural history are not very -_ generally formed, it appears necessary to begin by defining “its peculiar object, and establishing rigorous limits between it ‘and neighbouring sciences. — Tn our language and in most others, the word NATURE is variously employed. _ At one time it is used to express the qualities a being derives from birth,.in opposition to those it may owe to art; at another, the entire mass of beings whicli eompose the universe ; and at a third, the laws which govern those beings. . It is in this latter sense particularly that we usually personify nature, and, through respect, use its name for that of 3 its Creator. Physics, or Natural Philosophy, treats of the nature of these three relations, and is either general or particular. General physics examines abstractedly each of the properties of those movable and extended beings we call bodies. ‘That braneh of them styled Dynamics, considers bodies in mass; and pro- ceeding from a very small number of experiments, determines mathematically the laws of equilibrium, and those of motion - and of its communication. Its different divisions are termed ~ Statics, Hydrostatics, Hydrodynamics, Mechanics, &c. &ce., according to the nature of the particular bodies whose motions it examines. Optics considers the particular motions of light, whose phenomena, which hitherto nothing but experiment has been able to determine, aré becoming more numerous. Chemistry, another.branch of general physics, exposes the laws Ay which the saad molecules of bodies act,on each 6. ben Wor? FE HA 2."™ . INTRODUCTION. other; the cbimBinations or separations which result from the general tendency of these moleculesto re- unite; and the modifications which. the various circumstances capable of se- par ating or approximating them produce on that tendency. It is purely a science of expemMenis. and is irreducible to caleu- lation. . The theory of heat and that of sldbicicity belong either to dynamics or chemistry, deaortily to the point of view in which they are considered. The ruling method in all the branches of general physics consists in isolating, bodies, reducing them to their greatest simplicity, in bringing each of their properties separately e action, either by reflection or “experiment, and by observi S or calculating the results; and finally, i in Seneralising and con- necting the laws of these properties, so as to form codes, » " and, if it were possible, to refer them to.one s single ae into which they might all he resolved. ' The object of Particular Physics, ov of Ne wtural History ap for the terms are synonymous—is the special application of. the laws recognised by the various branches of gener hy- J Sics to the numerous and varied beings which! ist ff, _in order to explain the phenomena which eth of dove. ‘ sents. : *, a3 | Within this extensive range, astronomy Brod be in: * cluded; but that science, sufliciently elucidated by mechanics, and inilelidy subjected to its laws, employs methods, differ- ing too widely from those required by natural. history, to per- mit it to be cultivated by the students of the latter. ' Natural history, then, is confined to objects which do not allow of exact calculation, nor of precise measurement in all their parts. Meteorology also is substracted from it and united to general physics; so that, properly speaking, it considers only ~ inanimate bodies called minerals, and the different kinds of living beings, in all of which we may observe the effects, more or less various, of the laws of motion and chemical attraction, and of all the other causes analysed by general physics. Natural history, in strictness, should employ similar methods with the general sciences; and it does so, infact, whenever the- , ‘ iw 8 F # * INTRODUCTION. 3 , objects it examines are sufliciently simple to allow it. This, ~ however, is but very rarely the case. An essential difference between the general sciences and natural history is, that in the former, phenomena are examin- _ed, whose conditions are all regulated by the examiner, in order, by their analysis, to arrive at general laws; whereas, In the latter, they take place under circumstances beyond the control of him who studies them for the purpose of discover- ing/amid the complication, the effects of known general laws. He is not, like the experimenter, allowed to subtract them suc- cessively from each condition, and to reduce the problem to its elements—he is compelled to take it in its entireness, with ~ albits conditions at once, and can perform the analysis only in thought. Suppose, for example, we attempt to insulate the numerous phenomena which compose the life of any of the Ai her orders of animals; a single one being Suppncsad every * vestige of life is Seimhillteedl ~ Dynamics have thus nearly become a science of pure calcu- tions chemistry is still a science of, pure experiment; and natural history, in a great number of its branches, will long remain one of pure observation. *. These three terms sufficiently designate the methods em- ployed in the three branches of the natural sciences; but in establishing between them very different degrees of certitude, they indicate, at the same time, the point to which they should incessantly tend, in order to attain nearer and nearer to per- fection. _ Calculation, if we may so express it, thus commands nature, and determines her phenomena more exactly than observation can make them known; experiment compels her to unveil; while observation pries into her secrets when refractory, and endeavours to surprise her. There is, however, a principle peculiar to natur al history; which it uses with advantage on many occasions; it is that of the conditions of existence, commonly styled final causes. As nothing can exist without. the re-union of those conditions which render its existence possible, the component parts of each.being musf be so arranged as to render possible the whole 4 INTRODUCTION. being, not only with regard to itself but to its surrounding relations. The analysis of these conditions frequently con- ducts us to general laws, as certain as those that are derived from calculation or experiment. . It is only when all the laws of general physies and those which result from the conditions of existence are exhausted, that we are reduced to the simple laws of observation. The most effectual method of obtaining these, is that of comparison. ‘This consists in successively observing the same bodies in the different positions in which nature places them, or in a mutual comparison of different bodies; until we have ascertained invariable relations between their structures and the phenomena they exhibit. These various bodies are kinds of experiments ready prepared by nature, who adds to or de- , ducts from each of them different parts, just as we might wish to do in our laboratories ; showing us, herself, at the same mig their various results. In this way we finally succeed in establishing certain laws by which these relations are governed, and which are ind ployed like those that are determined by the general sciences. The incorporation of these laws of observation with the general laws, either directly or by the principle of the con- ditions of existence, would complete the system of the natural sciences, in rendering sensible in all its parts the mutual in- fluence of ev ery being. ‘To this end, should those who culti- vate these sciences direct all their efforts. All researches of this nature, however, pre-suppose means of distinguishing clearly, and causing others to distinguish, the _ bodies they are occupied with; otherwise we should be con- tinually confounding them. Natural history thenshould be based on what is called a system of nature; or a great cata- logue in which all created beings have suitable names, may be recognised by distinctive characters, and be arranged in divi- sions and subdivisions, themselves named and characterised, im which they may be found. In order that each being may be recognised in this catalogue, it must be accompanied by its character: habits or properties ‘ ~ v i ae ia ' ¥ INTRODUCTION. e 5 which are but momentary cannot, itien, furnish characters— they must be drawn from the conformation. : There is scarcely a single being which has a simple charac- ter, or can be recognised by one single feature of its conforma- tion; a union of several of these traits are almost always re- quired to distinguish one being from those that surround it, who also have some but not all of them, or who have them combined with others of which the first is destitute. The more numerous the beings to. be distinguished, the greater should be the number of traits; so that to distinguish an indi- Me ae being from all others, a complete description of it should enter into its character. ‘Tt is to avoid this i inconvenience, that divisions and subdi- ‘visions have been invented. A certain number only of neigh- bouring beings are compared with each other, and their cha- racters need only to express their differences, which, by the supposition itself, are. the least part of their conformation. Me a re-union is termed a genus. ™ The same inconvenience would be expericnoed in distin- : guishing genera from each other, were it not for the repetition of the operation in uniting the adjoining genera, so as to form an’ order, the orders to form a class, &c. Intermediate sub- - divisions may also be established. This scaffolding of divisions, the superior of which’ contain | ‘the inferior, is called a method. It isin some respects a sort of dictionary, in which we proceed from the properties of things _ to arrive at their names; being the reverse of the common ones, in which we proceed from the name to arrive at the property. , When the method is good, it does more than teach us names. If the subdivisions ‘have not been established arbitrarily, but are based on the true fundamental relations, on the essential resemblances of beings, the method is the surest means of re- ducing the properties of beings.to general rules, of expressing them in the fewest words, and of stamping them on the me- mory. To render it such, we employ an assiduous comparison of beings, directed by the principle of the sebordination of cha- Ve + 6 * "| - @INTRODUCTION. % » e Se fr , ts Baa facters, which is itself derived from that of the conditions of existence. . The parts of a being possessing a mutual adapta- tion, some traits of character exclude others, while on the : ma, contrary, there are others that require them. When, there- fore, we perceive such or such traitsin a being, we can caleu- late before hand those that co-exist in it, or those that are incompatible with them. ‘The parts, the properties, or the traits of conformation, which have the greatest number of ‘these relations of incompatibility or of co-existence with others, or, in other words, that exercise the most marked influence upon the whole of the being, are called the important charae- ters, dominating characters; the others are the sielong ) ioe a ee ’ characters, all varying in degree. This influence of characters is sometimes determined ration- ally, by the consideration of the nature of the organ. When this is impracticable, we have recourse to simple observations and a sure mark by which we may recognise the important characters, and one which is drawn from their own nature, is their superior constancy, and that in a long series of differént_ ad beings, approximated according to their degrees of similitude, these characters’ are the last to vary. That they should be preferred for distinguishing the great divisions, and that ‘in « a “—_ ‘ My proportion as we descend to the inferior subdivisions, we can ~ also descend to subordinate and variable characters, is a rule resulting equally from their influence and constancy. , There can be but one perfect method, which is the natural method. We thus name an arrangement in which beings of the same genus are placed nearer to each other than to those of the other genera; the genera of the samevorder nearer than those of the other orders, &c. &c. This method is the zdeal to which natural history should tend; for it is evident that if we ean reach it, we shall have the exact and complete expression of all nature. _ Infact, each being is determined by its resem- blance to others, and difference from them; and all these rela- tions would be fully given by the arrangement in question. In a word, the natural method would be the whole science, and every step towards it tends to advance the science to per-: fection. BON of 0 & INTRODUCTION. 7 >i Life being the most important of all the properties of be- ae, and. the highest of all characters, it is not surprising that ‘it has in all ages been made the most general principle of dis- tinction; and that natural beings have always been separated, into two immense divisions, the /iving and the znanimate. Of Living Beings, and Organization in general. If, in order to obtain a correct idea of the essence of life, we consider it in those beings in which its effects are the most simple, we quickly perceive that it consists in the faculty pos- sessed by certain corporeal combinations, of continuing for a time and under a determinate form, by constantly attracting into their composition a part of surrounding substances, and rendering to the elements, portions of their own. ‘Life then is a vortex, more or less rapid, more or less com- plicated, the direction of which is invariable, and which always carries . along molecules of similar kinds, but into which indi- ' vidual molecules are continually entering, and from which they are continually departing; so that the form of a living body is f more essential to it than its matter. As jong as this motion subsists, the body in which it takes dine! is living—i¢ lives. When it finally ceases, it dies. After death, the elements which compose it, abandoned.to the ordinary chemical affinities, soon separate, from which, more or less quickly, results the dissolution of the once living body. It was then by the vital motion that its dissolution was arrest- ed, and its elements were held in a temporary union. All living bodies die after a.certain period, whose extreme limit is fixed for each species, and death appears to be a ne- - cessary consequence of life, which, by its own action, insensi- bly alters the structure of the body, so as to render its conti- » nuance impossible. , In fact, the living body undergoes gradual, but continual changes, during the whole term of its existence. At first, it increases in dimensions, according to proportions, and within “limits, fixed: for each Species and for each one of its parts 5 it then augments in density in the most of its parts:—it is this : ‘8 INTRODUCTION. re second kind of change that appears to be the cause of ee death. ve x If we examine . the various : living bodies more closely, we find they possess a common structure, which a little reflection “soon causes us to perceive is essential to a vortex such as the vital motion. Solids, it is plain, are necessary to these bodies, for the maintenance of their forms; and fluids for the conservation of — motion in them. ‘Their tissue, accordingly, is composed of network and plates, or of fibres and solid lamine, within whose interstices are contained the fluids; it is in these fluids that the motion is most continued and extended. Foreign sub- stances penetrate the body and unite with them; they nourish the solids by the interposition of their sialniulole and also de- tach from them those that are superfluous. It is in a liquid or gaseous form that the matters to be exhaled traverse the pores of the living body ; but in return, it is the solids which contain the fluids, and by their contraction communicate to them part of their motion. This mutual action of the fluids and solids, this tmhsidon of molecules, required considerable affinity in their chemical — composition ; and such is the fact—the solids of organized bo- dies being mostly composed of elements easily convertible an fluids or gases. The motion of the fluids needing also a constantly repeated action on the part of the solids, and communicating one to them, required in the latter both flexibility and ciiptebiligey and accordingly we find this character nearly general in alk organized solids.. : This structure, common to all living baleen; this ar éolar tis- sue, whose more or less flexible fibres or lamin intercept fluids more or less abundant; constitutes what is called the organi~ zation. As a consequence of what we have said, it follows, _ that life can be enjoyed by organized bodies only. Organization, then, results from a great variety of arrange. ments, which are all conditions of life; and it is easy to con- ceive, that if its effect be to alter either of these conditions, so y, a - “ a INTRODUCTION, | 9 as to arrest even one of the partial motions of which it is com- posed, the general movement of life must cease. Every organized body, independently of the qualities com- mon to its tissue, has a form peculiar to itself, not merely ge- neral and external, but extending to the detail of the structure of each of its parts; and it is upon this form, which determines the particular direction of each of the partial movements that take place in it, that depends the complication of the general movement of its life—it constitutes its species and renders it what itis. Each part co-operates in this general movement by a peculiar action, and experiences from it particular effects, so that in every being life is a whole, resulting from the mu- tual action and re-action of all its parts. Life, then, in general, pre-supposes organization in gene- ral, and the life proper to each individual being pre-supposes an organization peculiar to that being, just as the movement of a clock pre-supposes the clock; and accordingly we behold life only in beings that are organized and formed to enjoy it, and all the efforts of philosophy have never been able to dis- cover matter in the act of organization, neither per se, nor by any external cause. In fact, life exercising upon the elements which at every moment form part of the living body, and upon those which it attracts to it, an action contrary to that which, without it, would be produced by the usual chemical affinities, it seems impossible that it can be produced by these affinities, and yet we know of no other power in nature capa- ble of re-uniting previously separated. molecules. The birth of organized beings is, therefore, the greatest _ mystery of the organic economy and of all nature: we see _ them developed, but never being formed; nay more, all those whose origin we can trace, have at first been attached toa _ body similar in form to their own, but which was developed before them—in a word, to a parent. So long as the offspring has no independent existence, but ,participates in that of: its parent, it is called a germ. The place to, which the germ Is - attached, and the cause which detaches -it and gives it an pide icy life; ; vary; 3 but Vou IB si? j irae > ys s BY hs, at Te Sere > ae + (6 10 INTRODUCTION. this primitive adhesion to a similar being, is a rule without exception. The separation of the germ is called generation. Every organized being re-produces others that are similar to itself, otherwise, death being a necessary consequence of life, the species would become extinct. Organized beings have even the faculty of reproducing, in degrees varying with the species, particular parts of which they may have been deprived—this is called the power of re- production. The development of organized beings is more or less rapid, and more or less extended, as circumstances are more or less favourable. Heat, the abundance and species of nutriment, with other causes, exercise great influence, and this influence may extend to the whole body in general, or to certain organs in particular: thence arises the impossibility of a perfect similitude between the offspring and parent. Differences of this kind, between organized beings, form ‘what are termed varieties. There is no proof, that all the differences which now dis- tinguish organized beings, are such as may have been pro- duced by circumstances. All that has been advanced upon this subject is hypothetical. Experience, on the contrary, ap- pears to prove, that, in the actual state of the globe, varieties are confined within rather narrow limits, and go back as far as we may, we still find those limits the same. Weare thus compelled to admit of certain forms, which, from the origin of things, have perpetuated themselves with- out exceeding these limits, and every being appertaining to one or other of these forms, constitutes what is termed a spe- cles. Varieties are accidental subdivisions of species. Generation being the only means of ascertaining the limits _ to which varieties may extend, species should be defined, the re-union of individuals descended one from the other, or from — common parents, or from such as resemble them, as strongly as they resemble each other. But although this definition is » strict, it will be seen that its application to particular indivi- duals may be very diflicult, where the necessary experiments have not been made. 4 by ~ perception or will. INTRODUCTION. 11 Thus then it stands—absorption, assimilation, exhalation, development and generation are functions common to all liv- ing bodies; birth and death the universal limits of their exist- ence; an areolar, contractile tissue, containing within its lamine fluids or gases in motion, the general essence of its struc- ture; substances almost all susceptible of conversion into fluids or gases, and combinations capable of an easy and mutual transformation, the basis of their chemical composition. Fixed forms that are perpetuated by generation distinguish their species, determine the complication of the secondary functions proper to each of them, and assign to them the parts they are to play on the great stage of the universe. These forms are neither produced nor changed by their own agency—life sup- poses their existence, its flame can only be kindled in an organization already prepared, and the most profound medita- tion and lynx-eyed and delicate observation can penetrate no farther than the mystery of the pre-existence of germs. Division of Organized Beings into Animals and Vegetables. Living or organized beings have always been subdivided into animate beings, that is, such as are possessed of sense and motion, and into zzanimate beings, which are deprived of both these faculties, and are reduced to the simple faculty of - vegetating. Although the leaves of several plants shrink from the touch, and the roots are steadily directed towards moisture, the leaves to light and air, and though parts of vegetables appear to oscillate without any apparent external cause, still these various motions have too little similarity to those of animals, to enable us to find in them any proofs of The spontaneity in the motions of animals required essen- _ tial modifications even in their purely vegetative organs. Foal 5 Pte Their roots not penetrating the earth, it was necessary they should be able to place within themselves a supply of aliment, and to carry its reservoir along with them. Hence is derived _ the first character of animals, or their alimentary canal, from ~ * - - dans suet “< see 12 INTRODUCTION. which their nutritive fluid penetrates all other parts througts pores or vessels, which are a kind of internal roots. The organization of this cavity and its appurtenances re- quired varying, according to the nature of the aliment, and the operation it had to undergo, before it could furnish juices fit for absorption; whilst the air and earth present to ve- getables nought but elaborated juices ready for absorption. The animal, whose functions are more numerous and varied than those of the plant, consequently necessitated an organiza- tion much more complete; besides this, its parts not being capable of preserving one fixed relative position, there were no means by which external causes could produce the motion of their fluids, which required an exemption from atmospheric influence; from this originates the second character of animals, their circulating system, one less essential than that of diges- tion, since in the more simple animals it is unnecessary. “The animal functions required organic systems, not needed by ve- getables—that of the muscles for voluntary motion, and nerves for sensibility ; and these two systems, like the rest, acting only through the motions and transformations of the fluids, it was necessary that these should be most numerous in animals, and that the chemical composition of the animal body be more com- plex than that of the plant; and so it is, for one substance more (azote) enters into it as an essential element, whilst in plants it is a mere accidental junction with the three other general elements of organization, oxygen, hydrogen, and carbon. This then is the third character of animals. From the sun and atmosphere, vegetables receive for their nutrition water, which is composed of oxygen and hydrogen ; air, which contains oxygen and azote ; and carbonic acid; which is a combination of oxygen and carbon. ‘To extract their own composition from these aliments, it was necessary they should retain the hydrogen and carbon, exhale the super- fluous oxygen and absorb little or no azote. Such, in fact, is vegetable life, whose essential function is the exhalation of oxygen, which is effected through the agency of light. Animals also derive nourishment, directly or indirectly, from the vegetable itself, in which hydrogen and carbon form . A ie Nag cal INTRODUCTION. 13 the principal parts. To assimilate them to their own compo- sition, they must get rid of the superabundant hydrogen and carbon in particular, and accumulate more azote, which is performed through the medium of respiration, by which the oxygen of the atmosphere combines with the hydrogen and. earbon of their blood, and is exhaled with them in the form of water and carbonic acid. The azote, whatever part of the body it may penetrate, seems always to remain there. The relations of vegetables and animals to the surrounding atmosphere are therefore in an inverse ratio—the former re- ject water and carbonic acid, while the latter produce them. The essential function of the animal body is respiration, it is that which in a manner animalizes it, and we shall see that the animal functions are the more completely exercised, in proportion to the greatness of the powers of respiration pos- sessed by the animal. ‘This difference of relations constitutes the fourth character of animals. Of the forms peculiar to the Organic Elements of the Ani- mal Body, and of the principal combinations of its Che- mical Elements. An areolar tissue and three chemical elements are essential to every living body; there is a fourth element peculiarly re- quisite to that of an animal; but this tissue is composed of variously formed meshes, and these elements are variously combined. There are three kinds of organic materials or forms of tex- ture, the cellular membrane, the muscular fibre, and the me- dullary matter, and to each form belongs a peculiar combina- ~ tion of chemical elements, as well as a particular function. i The cellular substance is composed of an infinity of small fibres and lamine, fortuitously disposed, so as form little cells that communicate with each other. It is a kind of sponge, which has the same form as the bedy, all other parts of which traverse or fill it, and contracting indefinitely, on the removal of the causes of its tension. It is this power that retains the wbggy' in a given aay and within certain limits. % ae ’ “a roby be” 14 INTRODUCTION. When condensed, this substance forms those lamin called membranes ; the membranes, rolled into cylinders, form those more or less ramified tubes named vessels; the filaments called Jibres are resolved into it, and bones are nothing but the same thing indurated by the accumulation of earthy particles. The cellular substance consists of a combination well known as gelatine, characterised by its solubility in boiling water, and forming, when cold, a trembling jelly. We have not yet been able to reduce the medullary matter to its organic molecules; to the naked eye, it appears like a sort of soft bouillie, consisting of excessively small globules; it is not susceptible of any apparent motion, but in it resides the admirable power of transmitting to the Me the impressions of the external senses, and conveying to the muscles the orders of the will. It constitutes the greater portion of the brain and the spinal marrow, and the nerves which are distributed to all the sentient organs are, essentially, mere fasciculi of its rami- fications. The fleshy or muscular fibre is a peculiar sort of filament, whose distinctive property, during life, is that of contracting when touched or struck, or when it experiences the action of the will through the medium of the nerve. The muscles, direct organs of voluntary motion, are mere bundles of fleshy fibres. All vessels and membranes which have any kind of compression to execute are armed with these fibres., They are always intimately connected with nervous threads, but those which belong to the purely vegetative func- tions contract, without the knowledge of the mr, so that, al- though the will is truly a means of ogi the fibres to act, it is neither general nor unique. The fleshy fibre has for its base a particular substance ealled fibrine, which is insoluble in boiling water, and which seems naturally to assume this filamentous disposition. The nutritive fluid or the blood, such as we find it in the vessels of the circulation, is not only mostly resolvable into the general elements of the animal body, carbon, hydrogen, oxygen and azote, but it also contains fibrine and gelatine, almost prepared to contract and to assume: the forms of imembranes , f : ; F Be ce) , ‘ Pe it a: 6 e ‘ \ ; ty 2 he we . *Sa> Me : 5 * iy elt a. 4 INTRODUCTION. 15 or filaments peculiar to them, all that is ever wanted for their manifestation being a little repose. ‘The blood also con- tains another combination, which is found in many animal fluids and solids, called albwmen, whose characteristic property is that of coagulating in boiling water. Besides these, the blood contains almost every element which may enter into the com- position of the body of each animal, such as the Jime and phosphorus which harden the bones of vertebrated animals, the tron from which it and various other parts receive their colour, the fat or animal oil which is deposited in the cellular substance to supple it, &c. All the fluids and solids of the animal body are composed of chemical elements found in the blood, and it is only by possessing a few elements more or less, that each of them is distinguished; whence it is plain, that their formation entirely depends on the subtraction of the whole or part of one or more elements of the blood, and in some few cases, on the addition of some element from else- where. These operations, by which the blood nourishes the fluid or solid matter of all parts of the body, may assume the general name of secretions. ‘This name, however, is often appropriated exclusively to the production of liquids ; while that of nutrt- tion is more especially applied to the formation and deposition of the matter necessary to the growth and conservation of the solids. The composition of every solid organ, of every fluid is pre- cisely such as fits it for the part it is to play, and it preserves it as long as health remains, because the blood renews it as fast as it becomes changed. The blood itself by this continued contribution is changed every moment, but is restored by di- gestion, which renews its matter by respiration, which delivers it from superfluous carbon and hydrogen, by perspiration and various other excretions, that relieve it from other superabun- dant principles, These perpetual changes of chemical composition form a part of the vital vortex, not less essential than» the visible movements and those of translation. The object of the latter is, in fact, but to produce the former, ait city. 16 INTRODUCTION. Of the forces which act in the Animal Body. The muscular fibre is not only the organ of voluntary mo- tion, for we have just seen that it is also the most powerful of the agents employed by nature to produce those transmutations so necessary to vegetative life. “Thus the fibres of the intes- tines produce the peristaltic motion, which causes the alimen- tary matter therein contained to pass through them; the fibres of the heart and arteries are the agents of the circulation and through it of all the secretions, &c. Volition contracts the fibre through the medium of the nerve 3 and the involuntary fibres, such as those we have men- tioned, being also animated by them, it is probable that these nerves are the cause of their contraction. All contraction, and generally speaking, every change of dimension in nature, is produced by a change of chemical composition, though it consist merely in the flowing or ebbing of an imponderable fluid, such as caloric; thus also are pro- duced the most violent movements known upon earth, explo- sions, &c. ' There is, consequently, good reason to suppose that the nerve acts upon the fibre through the medium of an impon- derable fluid, and the more so, as it is proved that this action is not mechanical. The medullary matter of the whole nervous system is ho- mogeneous, and must be able to exercise its peculiar func- tions wherever it is found; all its ramifications are abundantly supplied with blood vessels. All the animal fluids being drawn from the blood by secre- tion, we can have no doubt that such is the case with the ner- vous fluid, and that the medullary matter secretes it. On the other hand, it is certain that the medullary matter is the sole conductor of the nervous fluid; all the other or- ganic elements restrain and arrest-it, as Stas arrests electri- The external causes which are capable of producing sensa- tions or causing contractions of the fibre are all chemical INTRODUCTION. 17 agents, capable of effecting decompositions, such as light, caloric, the salts, odorous vapours, percussion, compression, &e. &e. It would appear then that these causes act on the nervous fluid chemically, and by changing its composition; this ap- pears the more likely, as their action becomes weakened by continuance, as if the nervous fluid needed the resumption of its primitive composition, to fit it for a fresh alteration. The external organs of the senses may be compared to sieves, which allow nothing to pass through to the nerve, ex- cept that species of agent which should affect it in that par- ticular place, but which often accumulates it so as to increase its effect. The tongue has its spongy papille which imbibe saline solutions; the ear, a gelatinous pulp which is violently agitated by sonorous vibrations; the eye, transparent lenses which concentrate the rays of light, &c. &c. It is probable, that what are styled irritants, or the agents which occasion the contractions of the fibre, exert this ac- tion by producing on the fibre, by the nerve, a similar effect to that produced on it by the will; that is, by altering the ner- vous fluid, in the way that is requisite to change the dimen- sions of the fibre which it influences: but with this process the will has nothing to do, and very often the ME is entirely ignorant of it. The muscles separated from the body pre- serve their susceptibility of irritation, as long as the portion of the nerve that remains with them preserves the power of acting on them—with this phenomenon the will has evidently no connexion. : The nervous fluid is altered by muscular irritation, as well as by sensibility and voluntary motion, and the same necessity exists for the re-establishment of its primitive composition. The transmutations necessary to vegetable life are occasioned by irritants; the aliment irritates the intestine, the blood irri- tates the heart, &e. These movements are all independent of the will, and generally (while in health) take place without the knowledge of the me; in several parts, the nerves that produce them are, even differently arranged from those that are appropriated to sensation or dependent on the will, and Vor. I.—C 8 18 INTRODUCTION. the very object of this difference appears to be the securing of this independence. The nervous functions, that is, sensibility and muscular ir- ritability, are so much the stronger at every point, in pro- portion as their exciting cause is abundant; and as this cause or the nervous fluid is produced by secretion, its abundance must be in proportion to the quantity of medullary or secre- tory matter, and the amount of blood received by the latter. In animals that have a circulating system, the blood is pro- pelled through the arteries which convey it to its destined parts, by means of their irritability and that of the heart. If these arteries be irritated, they act more strongly, and pro- pel a greater quantity of blood; the nervous fluid becomes more abundant and augments the local sensibility; this, in its turn, augments the irritability of the arteries, so that this mu- tual action may sometimes be carried to a great extent. It is called orgasm, and when it becomes painful and permanent, imflammation. The irritation may also originate in the nerve when exposed to the influence of acute sensations. This mutual influence of the nerves and fibres, either in- testinal or arterial, is the real spring of vegetative life in ani- mals. As each external sense is permeable only by such or such sensible substances, so each internal organ may be accessible only to this or that agent of irritation. Thus, mercury irri- tates the salivary glands, cantharides irritate the bladder, &e. These agents are called specifics. The nervous system being homogeneous and continuous, local sensations and irritation debilitate the whole, and each function, by excessive action, may weaken the others. Ex- cess of aliment weakens the power of thought, while long con- tinued meditation impairs that of digestion, &c. Excessive local irritation will enfeeble the whole body, as if all the powers of life were concentrated in one single point. A second irritation produced at another part may diminish, or divert, as it is termed, the first: such is the effect of blis- ters, purgatives, &e. ; Brief as our sketch has been, it is suflicient to establish the INTRODUCTION. 19 possibility of accounting for all the phenomena of physical life, from the properties it presents, by the simple admission of a fluid such as we have defined. Summary idea of the Functions and Organs of the Bodies of Animals, and of their various degrees of Complication. After what we have stated respecting the organic elements of the body, its chemical principles and acting powers, no- thing remains but to give a summary idea of the functions of which life is composed, and of their appropriate organs. The functions of the animal body are divided into two classes : The animal functions, or those proper to animals, that is to say, sensibility and voluntary motion. The vital, vegetative functions, or those common to animals and vegetables, i. e., nutrition and generation. Sensibility resides in the nervous system. The most general external sense is that of touch; it is seated in the skin, a membrane that envelopes the whole body, which is traversed in every direction by nerves whose extreme fila- ments expand on the surface into papillz, and are protected. by the epidermis and other insensible teguments, such as hairs, scales, &c. &c. ‘Taste and smell are merely delicate states of the sense of touch, for which the skin of the mouth and nos- trils is particularly organized: the first, by means of papille more convex and spongy; the second, by its extreme delicacy and the multiplication of its ever humid surface. We have already spoken of the ear and the eye. The organ of gene- ration is endowed with a sixth sense, seated in its internal skin; that of the stomach and intestines declares the state of those viscera by peculiar sensations. In fine, sensations more or less painful may originate in every part of the body through accident or disease. Many animals have neither ears nor nostrils, several are without eyes, and some are reduced to the single sense of touch, which is never absent. 20 INTRODUCTION. The action received by the external organs is continued by the nerves to the central masses of the nervous system, which, in the higher animals, consists of the brain and spinal mar- row. ‘The more elevated the nature of the animal, the more voluminous is the brain and the more is the sensitive power concentrated there; the lower the animal, the more the me- dullary masses are dispersed, and in the most imperfect genera, the entire nervous substance seems to melt into the general matter of the body. That part of the body which contains the brain and princi- pal organs of sense, is called the head. When the animal has received a sensation, and this has oc- casioned volition; it is by the nerves, also, that this volition is transmitted to the muscles. The muscles are bundles of fleshy fibres whose contractions produce all the movements of the animal body. The exten- sion of the limbs and every elongation, as well as every flexion and abbreviation of parts, are the effects of muscular contrac- tion. ‘The muscles of every animal are arranged, both as re- spects number and direction, according to the movements it has to make; and when these motions require force, the muscles are inserted into hard parts, articulated one over an- other, and may be considered as so many levers. ‘These parts are called bones in the vertebrated animals, where they are in- ternal, and are formed of a gelatinous mass, penetrated by par- ticles of phosphate of lime. In the Mollusca, the Crustacea, and Insects, where they are external, and composed of a cal- careous or horny substance that exudes between the skin and epidermis, they are called shells, crusts and scales. The fleshy fibres are attached to the hard parts by means of other fibres of a gelatinous nature, which seem to be a con- tinuation of the former, constituting what are called tendons. The configuration of the articulating surfaces of the hard parts limits their motion, which are also restrained by cords or envelopes, attached to the sides of the articulations, called ligaments. ‘It is from the various arrangements of this bony and mus- cular apparatus, and the form and proportion of the members eS ae ee INTRODUCTION. Al therefrom resulting, that animals are capable of executing the innumerable movements that enter into walking and leaping, flight and natation. The muscular fibres, appropriated to digestion and the cir- culation, are independent of the will; they receive nerves, however, but the chief of them are subdivided and arranged in amanner which seems to have for its object their indepen- dence of the Me. It is only in paroxysms of the passions and other powerful affections of the soul, which break down these barriers, that the empire of the mx is perceptible, and even then it is almost always to disorder these vegetative functions. It is, also, in a state of sickness only that these functions are accompanied with sensations: digestion is usually performed unconsciously. The aliment divided by the jaws and teeth, or sucked up when liquids constitute the food, is swallowed by the muscu- lar movements of the hinder parts of the mouth and throat, and deposited in the first portions of the alimentary canal that is usually expanded into one or more stomachs; there it is penetrated with juices fitted to dissolve it. Passing thence through the rest of the canal, it receives other juices destined to complete its preparation. The parietes of the canal are pierced with pores which extract from this alimentary mass its nutritious portion; the useless residuum is rejected as ex- crement. The canal in which this first act of nutrition is performed, is a continuation of the skin, and is composed of similar lay- ers; even the fibres that encircle it are analogous to those’ which adhere to the internal surface of the skin, called the fleshy pannicle. Throughout the whole interior of this canal - there is a transudation which has some connexion with the cu- taneous perspiration, and which becomes more abundant when the latter is suppressed; the absorption of,the skin is even very analogous to that of the intestines. It is in the lowest order of animals that the excrements are rejected by the mouth, their intestines resembling a sac, with but the one opening. Even among those where the intestinal canal has two ori- 22 INTRODUCTION. fices. there are many in which the nutritive juices being ab- sorbed by the parietes of the intestine, are immediately dif- fused throughout the whole spongy substance of the body: such, it would appear, is the case with all Insects. But from the Arachnoides and Worms upwards, the nutritive fluid circu- lates in a system of closed vessels, whose ultimate ramifications alone dispense its molecules to the parts that are nourished by it; the vessels that convey it are called arteries, those that bring it back to the centre of the circulation, ves. The circulating vortex is here simple, and there double and even triple (including that of the vena porte); the rapidity of its motion is often assisted by the contractions of a certain fleshy apparatus called a heart, which is placed at one or the other centres of circulation, and sometimes at both of them. In the red-blooded vertebrated animals, the nutritive fluid exudes from the intestines, white or transparent, and is then termed chyle; it is poured into the veins where it mingles with the blood, by two peculiar vessels called /acteals. Ves- sels similar to these lacteals, and forming with them an arrange- ment called the lymphatic system, also convey to the venous blood the residue of the nutrition of the parts and the pro- ducts of cutaneous absorption. Before the blood is fit to nourish the parts, it must expe- rience from the circumambient element the modification of which we have previously spoken. In animals possessing a circulating system, one portion of the vessels is destined to carry the blood into organs in which they spread it over a great surface to obtain an increase of this elemental influence. When that element is air, the surface is hollow, and is called lungs; when it is water, it is salient, and is termed branchiz. There is always an arrangement of the organs of motion for the purpose of propelling the element into, or upon, the organ of respiration. , In animals destitute of a circulating system, air is diffused through every part of the body by elastic vessels called tra- chez ; or water acts upon them, either by penetrating through vessels, or by simply bathing the surface of the skin. The respired, or purified blood is properly qualified for restoring a = INTRODUCTION. 23 the composition of all the parts, and to effect what is properly called nutrition. This facility, which the blood possesses, of decomposing itself at every point, so as to leave there the precise kind of molecule necessary, is indeed wonderful; but it is this wonder which constitutes the whole vegetative life. For the nourishment of the solids we see no cther arrangement than a great subdivision of the extreme arterial ramifications, but for the production of fluids the apparatus is more complex and various. Sometimes the extremities of the vessels simply spread themselves over large surfaces, whence the produced fluid exhales; at others it oozes from the bottom of little cavi- ties. Before these arterial extremities change into veins, they ‘most commonly give rise to particular vessels that convey this fluid, which appears to proceed from the exact point of union between the two kinds of vessels; in this case the blood ves- sels and these latter form, by interlacing, particular bodies call- ed conglomerate or secretory glands. Tp animals that have no circulation, in Insects particularly, the parts are all bathed in the nutritive fluid: each of these parts draws from it what it requires, and if the production of a liquid be necessary, proper vessels floating in the fluid take up by their pores the constituent elements of that liquid. It is thus that the blood incessantly supports the composi- tion of all the parts, and repairs the injuries arising from those changes which are the continual and necessary consequences of their functions. ‘The general ideas we form with respect to this process are tolerably clear, although we have no dis- tinct or detailed notion of what passes at each point, and for want of knowing the chemical composition of each part with suflicient precision, we cannot render an exact account of the _transmutations necessary to effect it. Besides the glands which separate from the blood those fluids that are destined for the imternal economy, there are some which detach others from it that“are to be totally eject- ed, either as superfluous—the urine, for instance, which is produced by the kidneys; or for some use to the animal, as the ink of the cuttle-fish, and the purple matter of various mol- lusca, &c. 24 INTRODUCTION. With respect to generation, there is a process or phenome- non, infinitely more diflicult to comprehend than that of the secretions—the production of the germ. We have even seen that it is to be considered as almost incomprehensible; but the existence of the germ being admitted, generation presents no particular difficulties. As long as it adheres to the parent, it is nourished as if it were one of its organs, and when it de- taches itself, it possesses its own life, which is essentially simi- lar to that of the adult. The germ, the embryo, the foetus, and the new-born ani- mal have never, however, exactly the same form as the adult, and the difference is sometimes so great, that their assimilation has been termed a metamorphosis. ‘Thus, no one not previ- ously aware of the fact would suppose that the caterpillar is to become a butterfly. Every living being is more or less metamorphosed in the course of its growth; that is, it loses certain parts, and deve- lopes others. The antennz, wings, and all the parts of the butterfly were enclosed beneath the skin of the caterpillar 5 this skin vanishes along with the jaws, feet, and other organs, that do not remain with the butterfly. The feet of the frog are enclosed by the skin of the tadpole; and the tadpole, to become a frog, parts with its tail, mouth, and branchie. The child, at birth, loses its placenta and membranes; at a certain period its thymus gland nearly disappears, and it gradually acquires hair, teeth, and beard; the relative size of its organs is altered, and its body augments in a greater ratio than its head, the head more than the internal ear, &c. The place where these germs are found, and their germs themselves are collectively styled the ovary; the canal through which, when detached, they are carried into the uterus, the oviduct; the cavity In which, im many species, they are com- pelled to remain for a longer or shorter period previous to birth, the wferus ; and the external orifice through which they pass into the world, the vulva. Where there are sexes, the male impregnates, the germs appearing in the female. The fecundating liquor is called semen; the glands that separate he oe | INTRODUCTION. 25 it from the blood, éesfess and when it is requisite it should be carried into the body of the female, the introductory organ is named a pents. Of the Intellectual Functions of Animals. The impression of external objects upon the me, the produc- tion of a sensation or of an image, is a mystery into which the human understanding cannot penetrate ; and materialism an hypothesis, so much the more conjectual, as philosophy can furnish no direct proof of the actual existence of matter. The naturalist, however, should examine what appear to be the material conditions of sensation, trace the ulterior operations of the mind, ascertain to what point they reach in each being, and assure himself whether they are not subject to conditions of perfection, dependent on the organization of each species, or on the momentary state of each individual body. To enable the me to perceive, there must be an uninter- rupted communication between the external sense and the central masses of the medullary system. It is then the modi- fication only experienced by these masses that the ME per- —ceives: there may also be real sensations, without the exter- nal organ being affected, and which originate either in the nervous chain of communication, or in the central mass itself; such are dreams and visions, or certain accidental sensations. By central masses, we mean a part of the nervous system, that is so much the more circumscribed, as the animal is more perfect. In man, it consists exclusively of a limited portion of the brain; but in reptiles, it includes the brain and the whole of the meduila, and of each of their parts taken sepa- _vately, so that the absence of the entire brain does not pre- vent sensation. In the inferior elasses this extension 1s still greater. The perception acquired by the mx, produces the image of the sensation experienced. We trace to without the cause of that sensation, and thus acquire the idea of the object that has produced it. By a necessary law of our iitelligelte all ideas of material objects are in time and space. é ~ * Vou. I.—D 26 INTRODUCTION. The modifications experienced by the medullary masses leave impressions there which are reproduced, and thus re- cal to the mind images and ideas; this is memory, a corporeal faculty that varies greatly, according to the age and health of the animal. Similar ideas, or such as have been acquired at the same time, recal each other; this is the association of ideas. ‘The order, extent and quickness of this association constitute the perfection of memory. Every object presents itself to the memory with all its quali- ties or with all its accessary ideas. Intelligence has the power of separating these accessary ideas of objects, and of combining those that are alike in several different objects under a general idea; the object of which no where really exists, nor presents itself per se—this is abstraction. Every sensation being more or less agreeable or disagree- able, experience and repeated essays soon show what move- ments are required to procure the one and avoid the other; and with respect to this, the intelligence abstracts itself from the general rules to direct the will. An agreeable sensation being liable to consequences that are not so, and vice versa, the subsequent sensations become asso- ciated with the idea of the primitive one, and modify the general rules framed by intelligence—this is prudence. From the application of these rules to general ideas, result certain formule, which are afterwards easily adapted to par- ticular cases—this is called reasoning. A lively remembrance of primitive and associated sensations, and of the impressions of pleasure or pain that belong to them, constitutes imagination. One privileged being, man, has the faculty of associating his general ideas with particular images more or less arbitrary, easily impressed upon the memory, and which serve to recal the general ideas they represent. These associated images are styled signs; their assemblage 1 is a language. When the language is composed of images: ‘that relate to the sense. of hearing or of sownds, it is termed speech, and when relative em at” INTRODUCTION. 27 to that of sight, hieroglyphics. Writing is a suite of images that relates to the sense of sight, by which we represent the elementary sounds; and by combining them, all the images relative to the sense of hearing of which speech is composed 5 it is therefore only a mediate representation of ideas. This faculty of representing general ideas by particular signs or images associated with them, enables us to retain dis- tinctly, and to remember without embarrassment, an im- mense number; and furnishes to the reasoning faculty and the imagination innumerable materials, and to individuals means of communication, which cause the whole species to participate in the experience of each individual, so that no bounds seem to be placed to the acquisition of knowledge; it is the distinguishing character of human intelligence. Although, with respect to the intellectual faculties, the most perfect animals are infinitely beneath man; it is certain that their intelligence performs operations of the same kind. ‘They move in consequence of sensations received, are susceptible of durable affections, and acquire by experience a certain know- ledge of things, by which they are governed independently of actual pain or pleasure, and by the simple foresight of conse- quences. When domesticated, they feel their subordination, know that the being who punishes them may refrain from so doing if he will, and when sensible of having done wrong, or behold him angry, they assume a suppliant and deprecating air. In the society of man they become either corrupted or improved, and are susceptible of emulation and jealousy: they have among themselves a natural language, which, it is true, is merely the expression of their momentary sensations, but man teaches them to understand another, much more compli- eated, by which he makes known to them his will, and causes them to execute it. | To sum up all, we perceive in the higher animals a certain degree of reason; , with all its consequences, good and bad, and 7 which appears to be ‘about the same as that of children ere they have learned to speak. ‘The lower we descend from man the weaker these facuities become, and at the bottom of the scale we find them reduced to signs (at times equivocal) of sensibi- 28 INTRODUCTION. lity, that is, to some few slight movements to escape from pain. Between these two extremes, the degrees are infinite. In a great number of animals, however, there exists another kind of intelligence, called instinct. This induces them to certain actions necessary to the preservation of the species, but very often altogether foreign to the apparent wants of the individual; often also very complicated, and which, if attri- buted to intelligence, would suppose a foresight and know- ledge in the species that perform them infinitely superior to what can possibly be granted. ‘These actions, the result of instinct, are not the effect of imitation, for very frequently the individuals who execute them have never seen them perform- ed by others: they are not proportioned to ordinary intelli- gence, but become more singular, more wise, more disinterest- ed, in proportion as the animals belong to less elevated classes, and in all the rest of their actions are more dull and stupid. They are so entirely the property of the species, that all its individuals perform them in the same way without ever im- proving them a particle. The working bees, for instance, have always constructed very ingenious edifices, agreeably to the rules of the highest geometry, and destined to lodge and nourish a posterity not even their own. ‘The solitary bee, and the wasp also, form highly complicated nests, in which to deposit their eggs. From this egg comes a worm, which has never seen its parent, which is ignorant of the structure of the prison in which it is confined, but which, once metamorphosed, constructs another precisely similar. The only method of obtaining a clear idea of instinct, is by admitting the existence of innate and perpetual images or sensations in the sensorium which cause the animal to act in the same way as ordinary or accidental sensations usually do. [t is a kind of perpetual vision or dream that always pecs it, and it may be considered, in all that has relation tov its in- stinct, as a kind of somnambulism. nigh gy MY Instinct has been granted to animals as a supplement: to in- telligence, to concur with it. and with strength and fecundity, in the preservation, to a proper degree, of each species. - INTRODUCTION. 29 There is no visible mark of instinct in the conformation of the animal, but, as well as it can be ascertained, the intelligence is always in proportion to the relative size of the brain, and particularly of its hemispheres. Of Method, as applied to the Animal Kingdom. From what has been stated with respect to methods in ge- neral, we have now to ascertain what are the essential charac- ters in animals, on which their primary divisions are to be founded. It is evident they should be those which are drawn from the animal functions, that is from the sensations, and mo- tions; for both these not only make the being an animal, but in a manner establish its degree of animality. Observation confirms this position by showing that their degrees of development and complication accord with those of the organs of the vegetative functions, The heart and the organs of the circulation form a kind of centre for the vegetative functions, as the brain and the trunk of the nervous system do for the animal ones. Now we see these two systems become imperfect and disappear together. In the lowest class of animals, where the nerves cease to be visible, the fibres are no longer distinct, and the organs of. digestion are simple excavations in the honogeneous mass of > the body. In insects the vascular system even disappears before the nervous one; but, in general, the dispersion of the medullary masses accompanies that of the muscular agents: a spinal marrow, on which the knots or ganglions represent so many brains, corresponds to a body divided into numerous’ rings, supported Wy pairs of limbs longitudinally distributed, &e. ith as £ mt p This correspondence of cane forms, which feagie from ~ the arrangement of the organs of motion, the distribution of the neryous masses, and the energy of the circulating system, should then be the basis of the primary divisions of the animal ‘kingdom. We will afterwards ascertain, in each of these divisions, what char acters should succeed immediately to those, and form the basis of the primary subdivisions. 30 INTRODUCTION. General distribution of the Animal Kingdom into Four Great Divisions. If, divesting ourselves of the prejudices founded on the divisions formerly admitted, we consider only the organization and nature of animals, without regard to their size, utility, the greater or less knowledge we have of them, and other ac- cessary circumstances, we shall find there are four principal forms, four general plans, if it may be so expressed, on which all animals seem to have been modelled, and whose ulterior divisions, whatever be the titles with which naturalists have decorated them, are merely slight modifications, founded on the development or addition of certain parts, which produce no essential change in the plan itself. In the first of these forms, which is that of man, and of the animals most nearly resembling him, the brain and principal trunk of the nervous system are enclosed in a bony envelope, formed by the cranium and vertebre; to the sides of this in- termedial column are attached the ribs, and bones of the limbs, which form the frame work of the body; the muscles generally cover the bones, whose motions they occasion, while the viscera are contained within the head and trunk. Ani- mals of this form we shall denominate Animalia Vertebrata. They have, all, red blood, a muscular heart, a mouth fur- nished with two jaws situated either above or before each other, distinct. organs of sight, hearing, smell and taste placed in the cavities of the face, never more than four limbs, the sexes always separated, and a very similar distribution of the medullary 1 mee and the principal branches of the nervous system. 1 Qs @ : Bya closer examination of each of the parts of this great series of animals, we always discover some analogy, even in, species the most remote from each. other and may trace the gradations of one same plan from man to the Jast of the fishes. In the second form there is no skeleton; the muscles are Pi INTRODUCTION. ol merely attached to the skin, which constitutes a soft contrac- tile envelope, in which, in many species, are formed stony plates, called shells, whose position and production are ana- logous to those of the mucous body. ‘The nervous system is contained within this general envelope along with the viscera, and is composed of several scattered masses connected by ner- vous filaments; the chief of these masses is placed on the cesophagus, and is called the brain. Of the four senses, the organs of two only are observable, those of taste and sight, the latter of which are even frequently wanting. One single family alone presents organs of hearing. ‘There is always, however, a complete system of circulation, and particular or- gans for respiration. ‘Those of digestion and secretion are nearly as complex as in the vertebrata. We will distinguish the animals of this second form by the appellation of Animalia Mollusea. Although, as respects the external configuration of the parts, the general plan of their organization is not as uniform as that of the vertebrata; there is always an equal degree of resemblance between them in the structure and the functions. The third form is that remarked in worms, insects, &c. Their nervous system consists of two long cords, running lon- gitudinally through the abdomen, dilated at intervals into knots or ganglions. The first of these knots, placed over the — cesophagus, and called brain, is scarcely any larger than those | that are along the abdomen, with which they communicate by filaments that encircle the cesophagus like a necklace. The covering or envelope of the body is divided by transverse _ folds into a certain number of rings, whose teguments : are ‘ sometimes soft, and sometimes hard; the muscles, however, ‘being always situated internally. Articulated limbs are fr ia quently attached to the trunk ; but very often there ar We will call these animals ‘ Animalia ee v4 hing Aidt a cay Hyatt Or articulated animals, in hem is observed the transition oe INTRODUCTION. from the circulation in closed vessels to nutrition by imbibi- - tion, and the corresponding one of respiration in circumscribed organs, to that effected by trachex or air-vessels distributed throughout the body. In them, the organs of taste and sight are the most distinct; one single family alone presenting that of hearing. Their jaws, when they have any, are always lateral. The fourth form, which embraces all those animals known by the name of zoophytes, may also properly be denominated Animaha Radiata, Or radiated animals. We have seen that the organs of sense and motion in all the preceding ones are symmetrically arranged on the two sides of an axis. ‘There is a posterior and anterior dissimilar face. In this last division, they are disposed like rays round a centre; and this is the case even when they consist of but two series, for then the two faces are similar. They approximate to the homogeneity of plants, having no very distinct nervous system or particular organs of sense; in some of them, it is even difficult to discover a ves- tige of circulation; their respiratory organs are almost univer- sally seated on the surface of the body, the intestine in the a _ greater number is a mere sac without issue, and the lowest of fee 7 the series are nothing but a sort of homogeneous pulp, endow- ae co with motion and peda (1) a) Before my time, modern naturalists divided all invertebrated animals into | ? ‘two classes, me and Worms. I was the first who attacked this method ; and ‘Voted te the characters and limits of the ane Crustacea, Insects .chinodermata and Zoophytes. In a memoir read before the Insti- the e Sst of December 1801, I ascertained the red-blooded worms or Anne-— ' a ly, ina memoir read before the Institute in July 1812, and printed du Museum d’Histoire Naturelle, tome xix, I distributed these = diviions, each of which is pipe to a branch of Pa @ $ * -— ‘ ty * . ® FIRST GREAT DIVISION OF THE ANIMAL KINGDOM. ANIMALIA VERTEBRATA. The bodies and limbs of vertebrated animals being sup- ported by a frame-work or skeleton composed of connected pieces that are movable upon each other, their motions are certain and vigorous. ‘The solidity of this support enables them to attain considerable size, and it is among them that the largest animals are found. The great concentration of the nervous system, and the volume of its central portions, give energy and stability to their sentiments, whence result superior intelligence and per- fectibility. , Their body always consists of a head, trunk and members. The head is formed by the cranium which contains the brain, and by the face which is composed of two jaws and of the receptacles of the senses. The trunk is supported by the spine and the ribs. The spine is formed of vertebra, the first of which sup- - ports the head, that move upon each other, and are perforated by an annular opening, forming together a canal, in which is lodged that medullary production from which arise the nerves, called the spinal marrow. _ The spine, most commonly, is continued into a tail, extend- ing beyond the posterior members. The ribs are a kind of semicircular hoops which protect Vou. l.—E 34 ANIMALIA VERTEBRATA. the sides of the cavity of the trunk, they are articulated at one extremity with the vertebra, and most generally at the other with the sternum; sometimes, however, they do not encircle the trunk, and there are genera in which they are hardly visible. There are never more than two pairs of hichibess but some- times one or the other is wanting, or even both. ‘Their forms vary according to the movements they have to execute. The superior members are converted into hands, feet, wings or fins, and the inferior into feet or fins. The blood is always red, and appears to be so composed as to sustain a peculiar energy of sentiment and muscular strength, but in various degrees, corresponding to their quality of re- spiration : from which originates the subdivision of the verte- brata into four classes. The external senses are always five in number, and reside in two eyes, two ears, two nostrils, the teguments of the tongue, and those of the body, generally. In some species, however, the eyes are obliterated. The nerves reach the medulla through the foramina of the vertebre or those of the cranium; they all seem to unite with this medulla, which, after crossing its filaments, spreads out to form the various lobes of which the brain is composed, and terminates in the two medullary arches called hemispheres, whose volume is m proportion to the extent of the intelligence. There are always two jaws, the greatest motion is in the lower one, which rises and falls; the upper jaw is sometimes immovable. Both of these are almost always armed with teeth, excrescences of a peculiar nature, which in their chemi- cal composition are very similar to that of bone, but which " grow by layers and transudations one whole class, however, that of birds, has the jaws invested with horn, and the genus Testudo, in the class of reptiles, is in the same case, % _ The intestinal canal traverses the body from the mouth to the anus, experiencing various enlargements and contractions having appendages and receiving solvent fluids, one.of which,” the saliva, is discharged into the mouth. The others, which are poured into the intestine only, have various names: the ANIMALIA VERTEBRATA. 35 two principal ones are the juices of the gland called the pan- creas, and bile, a product of another very large gland named the liver. While the digested aliment is traversing its canal, that por- tion of it which is fitted for nutrition, called the chyle, is ab- sorbed by particular vessels styled lacteals, and carried into the veins; the residue of the nourishment of the parts is also carried into the veins by vessels analogous to these lacteals, and forming with them one same system called the lymphatic system. The blood which has served to nourish the parts, and which has just been renewed by the chyle and lymph, is returned to— the heart by the veins—but this blood is obliged, either wholly or in part, to pass into the organ of respiration, in or- der to regain its arterial nature, previous to being again sent through the system by the arteries. In the three first classes this respiratory organ consists of lungs, that is, a collection of cells into which air penetrates. In fish only, and in some reptiles, while young, it consists of branchie or a series of lamin, between which water passes. In all the vertebrata, the blood which furnishes the liver with the materials of the bile is venous blood, which has eir- culated partly in the parietes of the intestines, and partly in a peculiar body called the spleen, and which, after being united in a trunk called the vena porta, is again subdivided at the liver. All these animals have a particular secretion; the wine, which is produced in two large glands, attached to the sides of the spine of the back, called Azdneys—the liquid they secrete is most commonly poured into a reservoir, named bladder. _ The sexes are separate, and the female has always one or two ovaries, from which the eggs are detached at the instant of conception. ‘The male fecundifies them with the seminal _ fluid, but the mode varies greatly. In most of the genera of the three first classes, it requires an intromission of the fluid ; in some reptiles, and in most of the fishes, it takes place after the exit of the egg. 36 ANIMALIA VERTEBRATA. Subdivision of the Vertebrata into Four Classes. We have just seen how far vertebrated animals resemble each other; they present, however, four great subdivisions or classes, characterised by the kind or power of their motions, which depend themselves on the quantity of their respiration, inasmuch as it is from this respiration that the muscular fibres derive the strength of their irritability. The quantity of respiration depends upon two agents: the first is the relative amount of blood which is poured into the respiratory organ in a given instant of time; the second is the relative amount of oxygen which enters into the composition of the surrounding fluid. The quantity of the former de- pends upon the disposition of the organs of circulation ‘and respiration. The organs of the circulation may be double, so that all the blood which is brought back from the various parts of the body by the veins, is forced to circulate through the respi- ratory organ, previous to resuming its former course through the arteries; or they may be simple, so that a part only of the blood is obliged to pass through that organ, the remainder returning directly to the body. The latter is the case with reptiles. The quantity of their respiration, and all their qualities which depend on it, vary with the amount of blood thrown into the tS at each pul- sation. Fishes have a double circulation, but their organ of respi- ration is formed to execute its function through the medium of water; and their blood is only acted on by the portion of oxygen it contains, so that the quantity of their respiration is perhaps less than that of reptiles. In the mammalia the circulation is double, and the aerial respiration simple, that is, it is performed in the lungs only ; their quantity of respiration is, consequently, superior to that of reptiles, on account of the form of their respiratory organ, and to that of fishes from the nature of their surrounding ele- ment. _) ANIMALIA VERTEBRATA. 37 The quantity of respiration in birds is even superior to that of quadrupeds, not only because they have a double circula- tion and an aerial respiration, but also because they respire by many other cavities besides the lungs, the air penetrating throughout their bodies, and bathing the branches of the aorta, as well as those of the pulmonary artery. Hence result the four different kinds of motion for which the four classes of vertebrated animals are more particularly designed: guadrupeds, in which the quantity of respiration is moderate, are generally formed to walk and run, both motions being characterized by precision and vigour; birds, which have more of it, possess the muscular strength and lightness requisite for flight; reptiles, where it is diminished, are con- demned to creep, and many of them pass a portion of ‘their lives in a kind of torpor; fishes, in fine, to execute their mo- tions, require to be supported in a fluid whose specific gravity is nearly as great as their own. All the circumstances of organization peculiar to each of these four classes, and those especially which regard motion and the external sensations, have a necessary relation with these essential characters. The mammalia, however, have particular characters in their viviparous mode of generation, in the manner by which the foetus is nourished in the uterus through the medium of the placenta, and in the mammez by which they suckle their young. The other classes, on the contrary, are oviparous, and if we compare them to the first, we shall find such numerous points of resemblance as announce a peculiar system of or ganization in the great general plan of the vertebrata. ¥ 38 ANIMALIA VERTEBRATA. CLASS I. MAMMALIA. The mammalia are placed at the head of the animal kingdom, not only because it is the class to which man himself belongs, but also because it is that which enjoys the most numerous faculties, the most delicate sensations, the most varied powers of motion, and in which all the different qualities seem com- bined in order to produce a more perfect degree of intelli- gence, the one most fertile in resources, most susceptible of perfection, and least the slave of instinct. As their quantity of respiration is moderate, they are de- signed in general for walking on the earth, but with vigorous and continued steps. ‘The forms of the articulations of their skeleton, are, consequently, strictly defined, which deter- mines all their motions with the most rigorous precision. Some of them, however, by means of limbs considerably elongated, and extended membranes, raise themselves in the air; others have them so shortened, that they can move with facility in water only, though this does not deprive them of the general characters of the class. The upper jaw, in all of these animals, is fixed to the cra- nium; the lower is formed of two pieces only, articulated by a projecting condyle to a fixed temporal bone; the neck con- sists of seven vertebr, one single species excepted which has nine; the anterior ribs are attached before, by cartilage, to a sternum consisting of several vertical pieces; their anterior extremity commences in a shoulder-blade, that is not articu- lated, but simply suspended in the flesh, often resting on the sternum by means of an intermediate bone, called a clavicle. $ MAMMALIA. 39 This extremity is continued by an arm, a fore-arm, and a hand, the latter being composed of two ranges of small bones called the carpus, of another range called the metacarpus, and of the fingers, each of which consists of two or three bones, ~ termed phalanges. With the exception of the cetacea, the first part of the pos- terior extremity, in all animals of this class, is fixed to the spine, forming a girdle or pelvis, which, in youth, consists of three pairs of bones, the ilium which is attached to the spine, the pubis which forms the anterior part of the girdle, and the ischium, the posterior. At the point of union of these three bones is situated the cavity with which the thigh is articulated, to which, in its turn, is attached the leg, formed of two bones, the tibia and fibula; this extremity is terminated by parts similar to those of the hand, i. e. by a tarsus, metatarsus and toes. The head of the mammalia is always articulated by two con- dyles, with the atlas, the first vertebra of the neck. The brain is always composed of two hemispheres, united by a medullary layer, called the corpus callosum, containing the ventricles, and enveloping four pairs of tubereles, ‘named the corpora striata, or striated bodies, the thalami nervorum op- ticorum, or beds of the optic nerves, and the nates and testes. Between the optic beds is a third ventricle, which communi- cates with a fourth under the cerebellum, the crura of which always form a transverse prominence under the medulla ob- longata, called the pons Varolit, or bridge of Varolius. The eye, invariably lodged in its orbit, is protected by two lids and a vestige of a third, and has its crystalline fixed by the ciliary processes—its sclerotic is simply cellular. The ear always contains a cavity called the tympanum, or ~ drum, which communicates with the mouth by the L'ustachian tube; the cavity itself is closed externally by a membrane call-. ed the membrana tympani, and contains a chain of four little - bones, named the ineus or anvil, malleus or hammer, the os _ orbiculare or circular bone, and the stapes or stirrup; a ves- tibule, on the entrance of which rests the stapes, and which communicates with three semicircular canals; and, finally, a 40 MAMMALIA. cochlea, which terminates by one canal in the vestibule, and by the other in the tympanum. Their cranium is subdivided into three portions; the ante- rior is formed by the two frontal and ethmoidal bones, the middle by the two ossa parietalia and the os ethmoides, and the posterior by the os occipitis. Between the ossa parietalia, the sphenoidalis and the os occipitis, are interposed the two temporal bones, part of which belong properly to the face. In the feetus, the occipital bone is divided into four parts: the sphenoidal into two halves, which are again subdivided into three pairs of lateral wings; the temporal into three, one of which serves to complete the cranium, the second to close the labyrinth of the ear, the third to form the parietes of the tympanum, &c. ‘These bony portions, still more numerous in the earliest period of the foetal existence, are united more or less promptly, according to the species, and the bones them- selves finally become consolidated in the adult. Their face consists of the two maxillary bones, between which pass the nostrils; the two intermaxillaries are situated before, and the two ossa palati behind them; between these descends the vomer, a bony process of the os ethmoides; at the entrance of the nasal canal are placed the ossa nasi; to its external parietes adhere the inferior turbinated bones, the superior ones which occupy its upper and posterior portion belonging to the os ethmoides. The jugal or cheek bone unites the maxillary to the temporal bone on each side, and frequently to the os frontis; 3; finally, the os unguis, and pars plana of the ethmoid bone occupy the internal angle of the orbit, and sometimes a part of the cheek. In the embryo state these bones also are much more subdivided. Their tongue is always fleshy, connected with a bone called the hyoides, which is composed of several pieces, and sus- pended from the cranium by ligaments. Their lungs, two in number, divided into lobes, and com- posed of an infinitude of cells, are always enclosed, without — any adhesion, in a cavity formed by the ribs and diaphragm and lined by the pleura; the organ of voice is always at the MAMMALIA. Al upper extremity of the trachea; a fleshy curtain, called the velum palati, establishes a direct communication between their larynx and nasal canal. Their residence on the surface of the earth rendering them less’ exposed to the alternations of cold and heat, their tegu- ment, the hair, is but moderately thick, and in such as inhabit warm climates, even that is rare. The Cetacea, which live exclusively in water, are the only ones that are altogether deprived of it. The abdominal cayity is lined with a membrane called the peritoneum, and the intestinal canal is suspended to a fold or it called the mesentery, which contains numerous conglobate glands in which the lacteals ramify: another production of the peritoneum, styled the epiploon, hangs in front of and un- der the intestines. ‘The urine which is retained for a time in the bladder finds an exit in both sexes, with very few exceptions, by orifices in the organs of generation. In all the Mammalia, generation is essentially viviparous; that is, the foetus, directly after conception, descends into the uterus enveloped in its membranes, the exterior of which is called chorion and the interior amntos; it fixes itself to the parietes of this cavity by one plexus, or more of vessels called the placenta, which establishes a communication between it and the mother, by which it receives its nourishment, and most probably its oxygenation, notwithstanding which, the foetus of the Mammalia, at an early period, has a vesicle analogous to that which contains the yolk in the Ovipara, receiving in like manner vessels from the mesentery. It has also another external bladder named the allantoid, which communicates with the urinary one by a canal called the wrachus. Conception always requires an effectual coitus, in which the semen masculinum is thrown into the uterus of the female. The young are nourished for some time after birth by a fluid (milk) peculiar to animals of this class, which is pro- duced by the mamme at the time of parturition, and continues to be so as long as is necessary. It is from the mamme that Vou. I.—F 28 . 42 MAMMALIA. this class derives its name, and being a character peculiar to it, they distinguish it better than any other that is external.(J) Division of the Mammalia into Orders. The variable characters which form essential differences among the Mammalia are taken from the organs of touch, on which depends their degree of ability or address, and from the organs of manducation, which determine the nature of their aliment, and are all closely connected, not only with every thing relative to the function of digestion, but also with a multitude of other differences relating even to their intelli- gence. . The degree of perfection of the organs of touch is esti- mated by the number and the pliability of the fingers, and from the greater or less extent to which their extremities are enveloped by the nail or the hoof. A hoof which completely envelopes the end of the toe, blunts its sensibility, and renders the foot incapable of seizing. The opposite extreme is when a nail, formed of one single lamina, covers only one of the faces of the extremity of the finger, leaving the other possessed of all its delicacy. The nature of the food is known by the grinders, to the form of which the articulation of the jaws universally corres- ponds. To cut flesh, grinders are required as trenchant as a saw, and jaws fitted like scissars, having no other motion than a verti- cal one. For bruising roots or grains, flat-crowned grinders are ne- cessary, and jaws that have a lateral motion; in order that inequalities may always exist on the crown of these teeth, it is also requisite that their substance be composed of parts of unequal hardness, so that some may wear away faster than others. Hoofed animals are all necessarily herbivorous, and have (1) We shall find, however, in the sequel some doubts on this subject, arising from certain points in the family of the Monotremata. MAMMALIA. 43 flat-crowned grinders, inasmuch as their feet preclude the possibility of their seizing a living prey. Animals with unguiculated fingers were susceptible of more variety; their food is of all kinds, and independently of the form of their grinders, they differ greatly from each other in the pliability and delicacy of their fingers. There is one character with respect to this, which has immense influence on their dexterity and greatly multiplies its powers; it is the faculty of opposing the thumb to the finger for the purpose of seizing minute objects, constituting what is properly called a hand; a faculty which is carried to its highest perfection in - man, in whom the whole anterior extremity is free and capable of prehension. These various combinations which strictly determine the nature of the different Mammalia, have given rise to the fol- lowing orders: Among the unguiculated animals, the first is Man, who, in addition to privileges of other descriptions, possesses hands at the anterior extremities only, the posterior being designed to support him in an erect position. In the order next to man, that of the guADRUMANA, we find hands at the four extremities. In another order, that of the CARNARIA, the thumb is not free, and cannot be opposed to the anterior extremities. Each of these orders has the three sorts of teeth, grinders, canini, and incisors or cutting teeth. In a fourth order, that of the RopENTTA, the toes differ but little from those of the Carnaria, but there are no canine teeth, and the incisors are placed in front of the mouth, and adapted to a very peculiar sort of manducation. Then come those animals whose toes are much cramped, and deeply sunk in large nails, which are generally curved; they have no incisors, and in some the canines disecmeaiat while others have none of any description. We comprise - them all under the title of the EDENTATA. This distribution of the unguiculated animals would be per- fect, and form a very regular series, were it not that New Holland has lately furnished us with a little collateral one, 44 MAMMALIA. consisting of animals with pouches, the different genera of which are connected by a general similarity of organization; some of them, however, in the teeth and nature of their diet corresponding to the Carnaria, others to the Rodentia, and a third to the Edentata. The hoofed animals are less numerous, and have likewise fewer irregularities. The RUMINANTIA, by their etovel foot, the absence of true incisors in their upper jaw, and their four stomachs, form an order that is very distinct. The remaining hoofed animals may all be united in a single order, which I shall call PACHYDERMATA or JUMENTA, the H/e- phant excepted, which might constitute a separate one, and which is remotely connected with that of the Rodentia. In the last place, we find those of the Mammalia which have no posterior extremities, whose piscatory form and aqua- tic mode of life would induce us to form them into a particu- lar class, were it not that in every thing else their economy is similar to that im which we leave them. ‘These are the hot- blooded fishes of the ancients, or the ceTacna, which, uniting to the vigour of the other mammalia the advantage of being sustained by the watery element, present to our wondering sight the most gigantic of animals. ORDER I. BIMANA. " : - Man forms but one genus, and that genus the only one of its order. As his history is the more dir ectly interesting to our- selves, and forms the point of comparison to which we refer that of other animals, we will speak of it more in detail. We will rapidly sketch every thing that is peculiar in each of his organic systems, amidst all that he shares in common with other mammalia; we will examine the advantages he Sa = BIMANA, 45 derives from these peculiarities over other species; we will describe the principal varieties of his race and their distin- euishing characters, and finally point out the natural order in which his individual and social faculties are developed. Peculiar Conformation of Man. The foot of Man is very different from that of the Monkey; it is large; the leg bears vertically upon it; the heel is expanded beneath; the toes are short, and but slightly flexible; the great toe, longer and larger than the rest, is placed on the same line with, and can- not be opposed to them. This foot, then,is peculiarly well adapted to support the body; but cannot be used for seizing or climbing, and as the hands are not calculated for walking, Man is the only true bimanous and biped animal. _*The whole body of Man is arranged with a view to a vertical po- sition. His feet, as just mentioned, furnish him with a base more extensive than that of any other of the Mammalia. The muscles which extend the foot and thigh are more vigorous, whence pro- ceeds the projection of the calf and buttock; the flexors of the leg are inserted higher up, which allows full extension of the knee, and renders the calf more apparent. The pelvis is wider, hence a greater separation of the thighs and feet, and that pyramidal form of the body so favourable to equilibrium. The necks of the thigh bones form an angle with the body of the bone, which increases, still more, the separation of the feet, and augments the basis of the body. Finally, the head in this vertical position is in equilibrium on the body, because its articulation is exactly under the middle of its mass. , Were he to desire it, Man could not, with convenience, walk on all fours; his short and nearly inflexible foot, and his Jong thigh, would bring the knee to the ground; his widely separated shoulders and his arms, too far extended from the median line, would ill sup- port the upper portion of his body. The great indented muscle, which, in quadrupeds, suspends, as in a girth, the body between the scapulz, is smaller in Man than in any one among them. The head is also heavier, both from the magnitude of the brain and the small-» » ness of the sinuses or cayities of the bones; and yet, the means of supporting it are weaker, for Be has neither cervical me onan nor are his vertebre so ar ranged ‘as to prevent their flexure forwards; the result of this wo ld be, that he could only keep his head in the same line with the spine, and then his eyes and mouth being directed towards the earth, he could not see before’ him;—in the erect posi- ys 46 MAMMALIA. tion, on the contrary, the arrangement of these organs is every way perfect. The arteries which are sent to his brain, not being subdivided as in many quadrupeds, and the blood requisite for so voluminous an organ being carried into it with too much violence, frequent apo- plexies would be the consequence of a horizontal position. Man, then, is formed for an erect position only. He thus pre- serves the entire use of his hands for the arts, while his organs of sense are most favourably situated for observation. These hands, which derive such advantages from their liberty, re- ceive as many more from their structure. The thumb, longer in proportion than that of the Monkey, increases its facility of seizing small objects. All the fingers, the annularis excepted, have sepa- rate movements, a faculty possessed by no other animal, not even‘by the Monkey. The nail, covering one side only of the extremity of the finger, acts as a support to the touch, without depriving it of an atom of its delicacy. The arms to which these hands are attached, are strongly and firmly connected by the large scapula, the strong clavicle, &c. Man, so highly favoured as to dexterity, is not at all so with respect to force. His swiftness inrunning is greatly inferior to that of other animals of his size. Having neither projecting jaws, nor salient canine teeth, nor claws, he is destitute of offensive weapons; and the sides and upper parts of his body being naked, unprovided even with hair, he is absolutely without defensive ones. Of all ani- mals, he is also the longest in attaining the power necessary to provide for himself. This very weakness, however, is but one advantage more—it com- pels him to have recourse to that intelligence within, for which he is so eminently conspicuous. No quadruped approaches him in the magnitude and convolutions of the hemispheres of the brain, that is, in the part of this organ which is the principal instrument of the intellectual operations. The posterior portion of the same organ extends backwards, sovas to form a second covering to the cerebellum; the very form of his cra- nium announces this magnitude of the brain, while the smallness of his face shows how slightly that portion of the nervous system which influences the external senses predominates in him. These pee sensations, moderate as they all are in Man, are nevertheless extremely delicate and well balanced. ¢ His two eyeglare directed forwards; he does not see on two sides at once, like many quadrupeds, which produces more unity in the result of his sight, and concentrates, his attention more closely on sensations of this kind.. ‘The ball and iris of his eye vary but little; BIMANA. 47 this restrains the activity of his sight to a limited distance, and a determined degree of light. His external ear, possessing but little mobility or extent, does not increase the intensity of sounds, and yet, of all animals, he best distinguishes the various degrees of in- tonation. His nostrils, more complicated than those of the Monkey, are less so than those of all other genera; and yet he appears to be the only animal whose sense of smell is sufficiently delicate to be affected by unpleasant odours. Delicacy of smell must have some influence on that of taste, and independently of this Man must have some advantage in this respect over other animals, those, at least, whose tongues are covered with scales. Lastly, the nicety of his tact results, both from the delicacy of his teguments, and the ab- sence of all insensible parts, as well as from the form of his hand, which is better adapted than that of any other animal for suiting itself to every little superficial inequality. Man is pre-eminently distinguished in the organ of his voice; of all the Mammalia, he alone possesses the faculty of articulating sounds, its probable causes being the form of his mouth and the great mobility of his lips. From this results his most invaluable mode of communication, for of all the signs which can be conveniently employed for the transmission of ideas, variations of sound are those which can be perceived at the greatest distance, and are the most extensive in their sphere of operation. The whole of his structure, even to the heart and great vessels, appears to have been framed with a view to a vertical position. The heart is placed obliquely on the diaphragm, and its point inclines to the left, thereby occasioning a distribution of the aorta, differing from that of most quadrupeds. The natural food of man, judging from his structure, appears to consist of the fruits, roots, and other succulent parts of vegetables: his hands offer him every facility for gathering them; his short, and but moderately strong jaws on the one hand, and his canini being equal in length to the remaining teeth, and his tubercular molares on the other, would allow him neither to feed on grass nor to deyour flesh, were these aliments not previously prepared by cooking. Once, however, possessed of fire, and those arts by which he is aided in seizing animals or killing them at a distance, every living being was rendered subservient to his nourishment, thereby giving him the means of an infinite multiplication of his species. His organs of digestion are in conformity with those of manduca- tion; his stomach is simple, his intestinal canal of moderate length, the great intestines well marked, his cecum short and thick and augmented by a small appendage, and his liver diyided | only into two e % 48 MAMMALIA. : large lobes and one small one; his epiploon hangs in front of the intestines, and extends into the pelvis. To complete the hasty sketch of the anatomical structure of Man requisite for this introduction, we will add, that he has thirty-two vertebrz, of which seven belong to the neck, twelve to the back, five to the loins, five to the sacrum, and three to the coccyx. Seven pairs of his ribs are united with the sternum by elongated cartilages, and are called true ribs; the five following pairs are denominated false ones. His adult cranium is formed of eight bones; an occipi- talis, two ossa temporis, two parietalia, and the frontal, ethmoidal and sphenoidal bones. The bones of his face are fourteen in number, two maxillaries, two ossa malz, each of which joins the temporal to the maxillary bone of its own side by a kind of handle called the zygomatic arch; two nasal bones, two ossa palati behind the palate, a vomer between the nostrils, two turbinated bones of the nose in the nostrils, two lachrymals (unguis) in the internal angles of the orbits and the single bone of the lower jaw. Each jaw has sixteen teeth; four cutting incisors in the middle, two pointed canines at the corners, and ten tuberculated molares, five on each side. At the extremity of the spine of his scapula, is a tuberosity called the acromion, to which the clavicle is attached, and over its articulation is a point called the coracoid process with which certain muscles are connected. The radius revolves upon the ulna, owing to the mode of its articulation with the humerus. The carpus has eight bones, four in each range; the tarsus has seven; those of the remain- ing parts of the hand and foot may be easily counted by the number of fingers and toes. Enjoying uniform and regular supplies of nourishment, the fruit of his industry, Man is at all times inclined to the ‘* plaisirs d’amour,”’ without ever experiencing that irresistible and violent impetus which marks the passion in quadrupeds. His organ of generation is not upheld by a bony axis; the prepuce does not tie it down to the abdomen, and it hangs loosely in front of the pubis. Numerous and large veins which effect a rapid transfer of the blood of his testes to the general circulation, appear to contribute to the moderation of his desires. The uterus of woman is a simple oval cavity; her mammz, only two in number, are placed upon her breast, and correspond with the facility she possesses of supporting her child upon her arm. Physiealyand Moral Development of Man. Age ¢ The term of gestation in the human species is nine months, aie but one child is usually produced at a birth, as in five hundred « 2 BIMANA. 49 cases of parturition there is but one of twins; more than the latter is extremely rare. The foetus, a month old, is generally about one inch in height; when two months, it is two inches and a half; when three, five inches; in the fifth month, it is six or seven inches; in the seventh, it is eleven inches; in the eighth, fourteen, and in the ninth, eighteen inches. Those which are born prior to the seventh month usually die. The first or milk teeth begin to appear in a few months, commencing with the incisors. ‘The number increases in two years to twenty, which, about the seventh year; are successively shed to make room for others. Of the twelve posterior molares which are permanent, there are four which make their appearance at four years and a half, and four at nine; the last four are frequently not cut until the twentieth year. The growth of the foetus is propor- tionably increased as it approaches the time of birth—that of the child, on the contrary, is always less and less. It has more than the fourth of its height when born; it attains the half of it at two years and a half, and the three-fourths at nine or ten years; its growth is completed about the eighteenth year. Man rarely ex- ceeds the height of six feet, and as rarely remains under five. Woman is usually some inches shorter. Puberty is announced by external symptoms, from the tenth to the twelfth year in girls, and from the twelfth to the sixteenth in boys; it arrives sooner in warm climates, and neither sex, (very rarely at least,) is productive before or after that manifestation. Scarcely has the body gained the full period of its growth in height, before it begins to increase in bulk; fat accumulates in the cellular tissue, the different vessels become gradually obstructed, the solids become rigid, and, after a life more or less long, more or less agitated, more or less painful, old age arrives with decrepitude, de- cay, and death. Man rarely lives beyond a hundred years, and most of the species, either from disease, accident, or old age, perish long before that term. The child needs the assistance of its mother much longer than her milk, from this it obtains an education both moral and physical, and a mutual attachment is created that is fervent and durable. The nearly equal number of the two sexes, the difficulty of supporting more than one wife, when wealth does not supply the want of power, all go to prove that monogamy is the mode of union most natu- ral to our species, and, as wherever this kind of tie exists, the father participates in the education of his offspring, the length of time re- quired for that education allows the birth of others—hence the na- tural permanence of the conjugal state. From the long period of infantile weakness springs domestic subordination, and the order of society in general, as the young people which compose the new Voy. LG 50 MAMMALIA. families continue to preserve with their parents those tender rela- . tions to which they have so long been accustomed. This disposi- tion to mutual assistance multiplies to an almost unlimited extent those advantages previously derived by insulated man from his in- telligence; it has assisted him to tame or repulse other animals, to defend himself from the effects of climate, and thus enabled him to cover the earth with his species. In other respects, man appears to possess nothing resembling in- stinct, no regular habit of industry produced by innate ideas; his knowledge is the result of his sensations and of his observation, or of those of his predecessors. Transmitted by speech, increased by meditation, and applied to his necessities and his enjoyments, they have originated all the arts of life. Language and letters, by pre- serving acquired knowledge, are a source of indefinite perfection to his species. Itis thus he has acquired ideas, and made all nature contribute to his wants. There are very different degrees of development, however, in man. The first hordes, compelied to live by fishing and hunting, or on wild fruits, and being obliged to devote all their time to search for the means of subsistence, and not being able to multiply greatly, because that would have destroyed the game, advanced but slowly. Their arts were limited to the construction of huts and canoes, to covering themselves with skins and the fabrication of arrows and nets. They observed such stars only as directed them in their jour- neys, and some few natural objects whose properties were of use to them. They domesticated the Dog, simply because he had a natu- ral inclination for their own kind of life. When they had succeeded in taming the herbivorous animals, they found in the possession of numerous flocks a never failing source of subsistence, and also some leisure, which they employed in extending the sphere of their ac- quirements. Some industry was then employed in the construction of dwellings and the making of clothes: the idea of property was admitted, and consequently that of barter, as well as wealth and difference of conditions, those fruitful sources of the noblest emula- tion and the vilest passions: but the necessity of searching for fresh pastures, and of obeying the changes of the seasons, still doomed them to a wandering life, and limited their improvement to a very narrow sphere. The multiplication of the human species, and its improvement in the arts and sciences, have only been carried to a high degree since the invention of agriculture and the division of the soil into heredi- tary possessions. By means of agriculture, the manual labour of a portion of society is adequate to the maintenance of the whole, and allows the remainder time for less necessary occupations, at the same BIMANA. Si time that the hope of acquiring, by industry, a comfortable exist- ence for self and posterity, has given a new spring to emulation. The discovery of a representative of property or a circulating me- dium, by facilitating exchanges and rendering fortunes more inde- pendent and susceptible of being increased, has carried this emula- tion to its highest degree, but by a necessary consequence it has also equally increased the vices of effeminacy and the furies of ambi- tion. The natural propensity to reduce every thing to general principles, and to search for the causes of every phenomenon, has produced re- flecting men, in every stage of society, who have added new ideas to those already obtained, nearly all of whom, while knowledge was confined to the few, endeavoured to convert their intellectual supe- riority into the means of domination, by exaggerating their own merit, and disguising the poverty of their knowledge by the propa- gation of superstitious ideas. An evil still more irremediable, is the abuse of physical power : now that man only can injure man, he is continually seeking to do so, and is the only animal upon earth that is for ever at war with his own species. Savages fight for a forest, and herdsmen for a pasture, and as often as they can, break inupon the cultivators of the earth to rob them of the fruits of their long and painful labours. Even civilized nations, far from being contented with their blessings, pour out each other’s blood for the prerogatives of pride, or the monopoly of trade. Hence, the necessity for governments to direct the national wars, and to repress or reduce to regular forms the quarrels of individuals. The social condition of man has been restrained, or advanced by » oe circumstances more or less favourable. The glacial climates of the north of both continents, and the im- penetrable forests of America are still inhabited by the savage hun- ter or fisherman. The immense sandy and salt plains of central Asia and Africa are covered with a pastoral people, and innumerable herds. These half civilized hordes assemble at the callvof every enthusiastic chief, and rush like a torrent on the cultivated coun- tries that surround them, in which they establish themselves, but to, be weakened by luxury, and in their turn to become the prey of , others. This is the true cause of that despotism which has always crushed and Bees cy ed the industry of Persia, India, and China. Mild climates, soils naturally irrigated and rich in vegetables, are the cradles of agriculture and civilization, and when so situated as to be sheltered from the incursions of barbarians, every species of talent is excited; such were (the first in Europe) Italy and Greece, and such is, at present, nearly all that happy portion of the earth. 52 MAMMALIA. There are, however, certain intrinsic causes which seem to arrest the progress of particular races, although situated amidst the most favourable circumstances. Varieties of the Human Species. Although the promiscuous intercourse of the human species, which produces individuals capable of propagation, would seem to demonstrate its unity, certain hereditary peculiarities of conforma- tion are observed which constitute what are termed races. Three of them in particular appear very distinct—the Caucasian or white, the Mongolian or yellow, and the Ethiopian or negro. The Caucasian, to which we belong, is distinguished by the beauty of the oval formed by his head, varying in complexion and the colour of the hair. To this variety, the most highly civilized nations, and those which have generally held all others in subjection, are in- debted for their origin. The Mongolian is known by his high cheek bones, flat visage, narrow and oblique eyes, straight black hair, scanty beard and olive complexion. Great empires have been established by this race in ‘China and Japan, and their conquests been extended to this side of the Great Desert. In civilization, however, it has always remained stationary. The Negro race is confined to the south of mount Atlas; it is marked by a black complexion, crisped or woolly hair, compressed cranium, and a flat nose. The projection of the lower parts of the face, and the thick lips, evidently approximate it to the monkey tribe: the hordes of which it consists have always remained in the . most complete state of utter barbarism. The race from which we are descended has been called Caucasian, because tradition and the filiation of nations seem to refer its origin to that group of mountains situated between the Caspian and Black seas, whence, as from a centre, it has been extended like the radii of -acircle. Various nations in the vicinity of Caucasus, the Georgians and Circassians, are still considered the handsomest on earth. The » principal ramifications of this race may be distinguished by the ana- logies of language. The Armenian or Syrian branch, stretching _to the south, produced the Assyrians, the Chaldeans, the hitherto “untameable Arabs, who, after Mahomet, were near becoming mas- ters of the world; the Phenicians, Jews and Abyssinians, which were Arabian colonies ; and most probably the Egyptians. It is from this branch, always inclined to mysticism, that have. sprung the most widely extended forms of religion—the arts and literature BIMANA,. 53 have sometimes flourished among its nations, but always enveloped in a strange disguise and figurative style. The Indian, German, and Pelasgic branch is much more extend- ed, and was much earlier divided: notwithstanding which, the most numerous affinities may be observed between its four principal lan- guages—the Sanscrit, the present sacred language of the Hindoos, and the parent of the greater number of the dialects of Hindostan; the ancient language of the Pelasgi, common mother of the Greek, Latin, many tongues that are extinct, and of all those of the south of Europe; the Gothic or Teutonic, from which are derived the lan- guages of the north and north-west of Europe, such as the German, Dutch, English, Danish, Swedish, and other dialects; and finally, the Sclavonian, from which spring those of the north-east, the Rus- sian, Polish, Bohemian, &c. It is by this great and venerable branch of the Caucasian stock, that philosophy, the arts, and the sciences have been carried to the greatest perfection, and remained in the keeping of the nations which compose it for more than three thousand years. It was preceded in Europe by the Celts, who came from the north, whose tribes, once very numerous, are now confined to its most eastern extremity, and by the Cantabrians, who passed from Africa into Spain, now confounded with the many nations whose posterity have intermingled in that peninsula. The ancient Persians originate from the same source as the In- dians, and their descendants to the present hour bear great marks of resemblance to the people of Europe. The predatory tribes of the Scythian and Tartar branch, extending at first to the north and north-east, always wandering over the im- mense plains of those countries, returned only to devastate the happier abodes of their more civilized brethren. The Scythians, who, at so remote a period, made irruptions into upper Asia; the Parthians, who there destroyed the Greek and Roman domination; the Turks, who there subverted that of the Arabs, and subjugated in Europe the unfortunate remnant of the Grecian people, all swarmed from this prolific branch. The Finlanders and Hungarians are tribes of ‘the same division, which have strayed among the Sclavonic and Teutonic nations. Their original country, to the north and north- east of the Caspian sea still contains inhabitants who have the same origin, and speak similar languages, but mingled with other petty “nations, variously descended, and of different languages. The Tar- tars remained unmixed longer than the others in the country in- cluded between the mouth of the Danube to beyond the Irtisch, from which they so long menaced Russia, and where they have finally been subjugated by her. The Mongoles, however, have 54 MAMMALIA. mingled their blood with that of those they conquered, many traces of which may still be found among the inhabitants of lesser Tartary. It is to the east of this Tartar branch of the Caucasian race that the Mongolian race begins, whence it extends to the eastern ocean. Its branches, the Calmucs, &c. still wandering shepherds, are con- stantly traversing the desert. Thrice did their ancestors under Attila, Genghis, and Tamerlane, spread far the terror of their’name. The Chinese are the earliest and most civilized branch not only of this race, to which they belong, but of all the nations upon earth. A third branch, the Mantchures, recently conquered, and still govern China. The Japanese, Coreans, and nearly all the hordes which extend to the north-east of Siberia, subject to Russia, are also to be considered, in a great measure, as originating from this race; and such also is esteemed the fact, with regard to the original inha- bitants of various islands of that Archipelago. With the exception of a few Chinese literati, the different nations of the Mongoles are universally addicted to Buddism, or the religion of Fo. - The origin of this great race appears to have been in the moun- - tains of Atlai, but it is impossible to trace the filiation of its diffe- rent branches with the same certainty as we have done those of the Caucasian. The history of these wandering nations is as fugitive as their establishments, and that of the Chinese, confined exclusively to their own empire, gives us nothing satisfactory with respect to their neighbours. The affinities of their languages are also too little known to direct us in this labyrinth. The languages of the north of the Peninsula beyond the Ganges, as well as that of Thibet, are somewhat allied to the Chinese, at least in their monosyllabic structure, and the people who speak them have features somewhat resembling other Mongoles. The south of this Peninsula, however, is inhabited by Malays, whose forms approximate them much nearer to the Indians, whose race and language are extended over all the coasts of the islands of the Indian Archipelago. The innumerable little islands of the southern ocean are also peopled by a handsome race, nearly allied to the In- dians, whose language is very similar to the Malay; in the interior ‘of the largest of these islands, particularly in the wilder portions of it, is another race of men with black complexions, crisped hair, and negro faces, called Alfourous. On the coast of New Guinea, and in the neighbouring islands, we find other negroes, nearly similar to those of the eastern coast of Africa, named Papuas ;(1) to the latter, (1) With respect to the various nations of the Indian and Pacific oceans, see the dissertation of Messrs Lesson and Gartigt in the Zoologie du Voyage de la — eo . Ce rn is , i Pie. BIMANA. 5D are generally referred the people of Van-Diemen’s land, and those of New Holland to the Alfourous. These Malays, and these Papuas are not easily referable to either of the three great races of which we have been speaking, but can the former be clearly distinguished from their neighbours, the Cau- casian Hindoos and the Mongolian Chinese? As for us, we confess we cannot discover any sufficient characteristics in them for that purpose. Are the Papuas Negroes, which may formerly have strayed into the Indian ocean? We possess neither figures nor descriptions sufficiently precise to enable us to answer this question. ' The northern inhabitants of both continents, the Samoiédes, the Laplanders, and the Esquimaux spring, according to some, from the Mongolian race, while others assert that they are mere degenerate offsets from the Scythian and Tartar branch of the Caucasian stock. We have not yet been able to refer the Americans to any of the races of the eastern continents still, they have no precise nor con- stant character which can entitle them to be considered as a par- ticular one. Their copper coloured complexion is not sufficient; their generally black hair and scanty beard would induce us to refer them to the Mongoles, if their defined features, projecting nose, large and open eye, did not oppose such a theory, and corres- pond with the features of the European. Their languages are as numberless as their tribes, and no demonstrative analogy has as yet been obtained, either with each other, or with those of the old world.(1) ORDER I. QUADRUMANA. Independently of the anatomical details which distinguish “it from man, and which have been given, this family differs: from our species in a very remarkable way. All the animals belonging to it have the toes of the hind feet free and oppo- ae Coquille, p. 1—113. For the languages of the Asiatics and their affinities, con- ‘sult the Asia Polyglotta of M. Klaproth. ‘() See the Voyage de M. de Humboldt, and the dissertations of Vater and Mitchill. 56 MAMMALIA. sable to the others, and the toes are all as long and flexible as fingers. In consequence of this, the whole species climb trees with the greatest facility, while it is only with pain and difficulty they can stand and walk upright; their foot then resting on its outer edge only, and their narrow pelvis being un- favourable to an equilibrium. ‘They all have intestines very similar to those of man; the eyes directed forwards, the mam- mz on the breast, the penis pendent. ‘The brain has three lobes on each side, the posterior of which covers the cerebel- lum, and the temporal fosse are separated from the orbits by a bony partition. In every thing else, however, they gradu- ally lessen in resemblance to him, by assuming a muzzle more and more elongated, a tail and a gait more like that of quad- rupeds. Notwithstanding this, the freedom of their arms and the complication of their hands allow them all to perform many of the actions of man as well as to imitate his gestures. They have long been divided into two genera, the Monkeys and the Lemurs, which, by the multiplication of secondary forms, have now become two small families, between which we must place a third genus that of the Oudstitis, as it is not conveniently referable to the one or the other. Simta. ~ Lin. The monkeys are all quadrumana, which have four straight incisors in each jaw, and flat nails on all the extremities; two characters which approximate them more nearly to man, than the subsequent genera; their molares have also blunt tubercles like ours, and their food consists chiefly of fruits. Their canine teeth, however, being — longer than the rest, supply them with a weapon we do not possess, and which require a hollow in the opposite jaw, to receive them when the mouth is closed. They may be divided, from the number of their molar teeth, into ‘two principal subgenera, which are again subdivided into nu- merous groups.(1) The (1) Buffon subdivided the monkeys into five tribes: the true monkeys without — tails ; the baboons with short tails ; the gwenons with long tails and callous buttocks ; the sapajous with long prehensile tails and no callus ; the sagouins with long tails, not prehensile and without callus. Erxleben, adopting this division, translated these names by simia, papio, cercopithecus, cebus and callithrix. Thus it is, that | _ the names cebus and callithriz, by which the ancients designated monkeys of Af- “4 QUADRUMANA. 57 Moykeys, properly so called, Or those of the eastern continent, have the same number of grin- ders as Man, but otherwise differing from each other by characters, which have formed the grounds of the following subdivisions. The Sita, Erxl.—Pitruecus, Geoffr. The Ourangs(1) are the only monkeys of the ancient continent which have no callus on the buttock; their hyoid bone, liver and czcum resemble those of Man. Their nose is not prominent, they have no cheek-pouches, nor a vestige of a tail. Some of them have arms long enough to reach the ground when standing—their legs, on the contrary, are very short. S. satyrus, L.; Audeb., pl..23; Fr. Cuv. pl. 2.. (The Ourang- Outang.)(2) Of all animals, this Ourang is considered as ap- proaching most nearly to Man in the form of his head, height of forehead, and volume of brain; but the exaggerated descrip- tions of some authors respecting this resemblance, are partly to be attributed to the fact of their being drawn from young in- dividuals only; and there is every reason to believe, that with age, their muzzle becomes much more prominent. The body is covered with coarse red hair, the face bluish, and the hinder thumbs very short compared with the toes. His lips are sus- ceptible of a singular elongation, and possess great. mobility. His history has been much disfigured by mingling it with that ' of the other great monkeys, that of the Chimpansé in particu- lar. After a strict and critical examination, I have ascertained rica and India, have been transferred to those of America. The genus Papio, founded solely on the shortness of the tail, could not be retained, as it violated natural. affinities, and all the others required subdividing. It was also necessary to abolish the genus Ouistitis, which was comprised in that of the Sagouins, but which does not altogether correspond with the common characters of the other monkeys. (1) Orang is a Malay word signifying reasonable being, which is applied to man, the ourang-outang, and the elephant. Outang means wild, or of the woods; hence, Wild Man of the Woods. (2) The only good figure of the Ourang-Outang we had for a long time was that of Vosmaer, taken from a living specimen at the Hague. That of Buffon, Suppl. VIII, pl. 1, is every way erroneous ; that of Allamand (Buff. d’Holl. XV, pl. 11,) is somewhat better—it was copied in Schreber, pl. 2, B. That of Camper, copied ib., pl. 2, C, is tolerably exact, but is easily discovered to have been taken from the dead body. Bontius, Med. Ind. 84, givesa completely ideal one, although Linnzus took it for the type of his troglodyte (Amen. Ac. VI, pl. 1,41). There are some good ones in Griffith, and in Krusenstern’s Voyage, pl. 94 and 95, but all of them from young subjects. Vou. I1.—H 58 MAMMALIA. that the Ourang-Outang inhabits the most eastern countries only, such as Malabar, Cochin China, and particularly the great island of Borneo, whence he has been occasionally brought to Europe by. the way of Java. When young, and such as he ap- pears to uS in his captivity, he isa mild and gentle animal, easily rendered tame and affectionate, which is enabled by his conformation to imitate many of our actions, but whose intel- ligence doesnot appear to be as great as is reported, not much surpassing even that of the Dog. Camper discovered, and has well described two membranous sacs in this animal which com- municate with the glottis, that produce a hoarseness of his voice —he was mistaken, however, in imagining that the nails are always wanting on his hinder thumbs. There is a monkey in Borneo, hitherto known only by his skeleton, called the Pongo,(1) which so closely resembles the Ourang-Outang in the proportions of all his parts, and by the ar- rangement of the foramina, and sutures of the head, that, not- withstanding the great prominence of the muzzle, the small- ness of thé cranium, and the height of the branches of the lower’ jaw, we are tempted to consider him an adult—if not of the species of the Ourang-Outang, at least of one very nearlyvallied to it. The length of the arms, that of the apophyses of the cervical vertebra, and the tuberosity of his calcaneum, may enable him to assume the vertical position, and walk upon two feet. He is the largest monkey known, and in size is nearly equal to Man. , Mr J. Harwood, in the Trans. Tan Soc. XV, p: 471, es scribes the feet of an ourang, fifteen English inches in length. This announces a very great stature in the animal to which they belonged, and would have led him to the belief that the Pongo is the adult Ourang-Outang, were it not that the skele- ton of the Pongo in the College of Surgeons, at London, has one lumbar vertebra more than those of the Ourangs. This, ‘ep o (1) Audeb. Singes, pl. anat. 2. This name of Pongo, a corruption of Boggo, which is given in Africa to the Chimpansé, or to the Mandrill, was applied by Buffon to a pretended large species of Ourang-Outang—the mere imaginary pro- duct of his combinations. Wurmb, a naturalist of Batavia, has transferred it to this animal, which he was the first to describe, and of which Buffon never had any idea. See Mem. of the Soc. of Batavia, vol. ii, p. 245. The thought, that it might be an adult Ourang, struck me on examining the head of an ordinary’ Ourang, whose muzzle pr ojected much more than those of the very young speci- mens hitherto described. Idescribed it ina memoir read before the Acad. des Sciences in 1818. Tilesius and Rudolphi appear also to haye had it. See the Mem. of the Acad. of Berlin, 1824, p. 131. ’ QUADRUMANA. 59 however, is no objection—the same variation is frequently observed in the human subject. | The arms of the remaining Ourangs reach only to the knee. They have no forehead, and the cranium retreats from the crest of the eye-brow. The name of CurmpansEs might be exclusively applied to them. S. troglodytes, L. (The Chimpansé)(1) is covered with black or brown hair. Could any reliance be placed on the accounts of travellers, this animal must be equal or superior to man in stature, but no part of it hitherto seen in Europe indicates this extraordinary size. It inhabits Guinea and Congo, lives in troops, constructs huts of leaves and sticks, arms itself with clubs and stones, and thus repulses men and elephants; pur- sues and abducts, as is said, negro women, &c. Naturalists have generally confounded it with the Ourang-Outang. When domesticated he soon learns to walk, sit, and eat like a man. We now separate the Gibbons from the Ourangs. Hirosates, Illig. "The Gibbons have the long arms of the true Ourangs, and the low forehead of the Chimpansé, along with the callous buttocks of the Guenons, differing however from the latter.in having no tail * or cheek-pouch. » They all inhabit the most remote parts of India. S. lars L.; Buff. XIV, 2; Onko, Fred. Cuv. pl. 5 and 6, (The Black Gibbon) is covered with coarse black hairs, ae has a whitish circle round his face. ' H. agilis, Fred. Cuy. pl. 3 and 4; Petit Gibbon of Buffon, XIV, 3, (The Brown Gibbon) is brown—the circle round the face is of a pale red; the lower part of the back is of the same colour. The young are of a uniform yellowish white—it is very agile, and lives in pairs—its Malay name, Wouwou, is taken from its cry. S. leucisca, Schreber, pl. 3, B, (The Cinereous Gibbon) is covered with a soft and ash-coloured wool. The visage is (1) This is the Quojas morou or the Sutyr of Angola of Tulpius, who gives a bad figure of it, (Obs. Med., p. 271) and the Pygmy, much better represented by Tyson, (Anat. of a Pygmy, pl. 1,) copied by Schreber, pl. 1, B. Scotin had given a tolerable drawing of it, copied Amen, Acad. VI, pl. 1, fig. 3, and Schreber, 1, C. An individual that lived with Buffon, and which is still preserved in the Museum, is represented, though badly, in the Hist. Nat. XIV, 1, where he is called Jocko. The same specimen is much better in Lecat (Traite du Mouv. Muscl. pl. 1, fig. 1), under the name Quimpese. Audebert gives the -° but from the stuffed speci- men only—he calls it Pongo. * 60 MAMMALIA. black—lives among the reeds, and climbs to the tops of the highest branches of the bamboos, where it_ balances itself by its long arms. We might separate from the other Gibbons the Siamang. , S. syndactila, Raff., Fred. Cuv., pl. 2, (The Siamang) has the second and third toes of the hind foot united by a narrow mem- brane, the whole length of the first phalanx. It is black—the chin and eyebrows red—lives in numerous troops, which are led by courageous and vigilant chiefs, which, at sunrise and sunset, make the forest ring with the most frightful cries. Their larynx has a membranous sac connected with it. All the ensuing monkeys of the eastern continent have the liver divided into several lobes; the cecum thick, short, and without any appendage; the hyoid bone has the form ae a shield. Crercorrrnecus, Erxl., partim. The long-tailed monkeys(1) have a moderately prominent muz- zle (of 60°) ; cheek-pouches; ‘tail; callosities on the buttocks ; the last of the inferior molares with four tubercles like the rest. Nu- merous species, of every variety of size and colour, abound, in Africa, live in troops, and do much damage to the gardens and fields under cultivation. They are easily tamed. Simia rubra, Gm.; Buff. XIV, 30; Fred. Cuv. 24 (The - Patras.) Red fawn colour above, whitish below; a black band over the eyes, sometimes surmounted with white—from Sene- gal. Simia zxthiops, L.; Buff. XIV, 32; Fred. Cuv. 24.% (The Collared Mangabey.) A chocolate brown above; below and the nape of the neck, whitish ; on the head a cap or coif of a lively red; eye-lids white. Buffon says it is from Madagascar, ‘and Hasselquist from Senegal; and in fact Sonnerat doglares, there are no monkeys in Madagascar. . Simia fuliginosa, Geoff.; Buff. XIV, 8253 Fred. Cuv. 25. (The Mangabey.) A chocolate brown, unghen above, fawn- coloured below; eye-lids white. Buffon says it is from Mada- gascar, and he believes it to be a variety of the preceding. Simia sabea, Lin.; Buff. XIV, 37; Fred. Cuv. 19. (The Green Monkey.)(2) It is greenish above, whitish beneath; face (1) Cercopithecus, i. e. tailed monkey, a name used by the Greeks. (2) Callithriz, Pliny, 1. 8, c. 54, is the name of an Ethiopian Monkey, furnished with a beard and a tufted tail, probably the Ouanderow. Buffon arbitrarily applied it to this species. * QUADRUMANA. 61 black ; the tufts on the cheeks yellowish; tip of the tail yellow. From Senegal. Simia faunus, Gm.; Malbrouc, Buff. XIV, 293 Stmia cy- nosuros, Scopol.s; Schr. pl. 14, C3; Fred. Cuv. pl. 22, var. of the callithrix; Audeb. 4th fam. 2d sect. pl. 5.(1) Greenish above ; limbs ash-coloured ; face flesh-coloured ; no yellow on the tail; one black, and one white band over the eye-brows 3 scro- tum of a beautiful ultramarine. Simia erythropyga, Fred. Cuv. pl. 21, (The Vervet) differs from the Malbrouc in the scrotum, which is surrounded with white hairs, the anus with red ones; and from the Grivet, (S. grisea) Fred. Cuy. 21, by a green scrotum, encircled with fawn-coloured hairs. Simia melarhina, Fred. Cuv. pl. 18.3; Buff. XIV, pl. 10. (The Talapoin.) Greenish above; tufts of the cheek yellowish; a black nose, in the middle of a flesh-coloured face. Sim. mona and S. monacha, Schreb.; Buff. XIV, 36; Fred. Cuv. 138. (The Mona.) Body brown, limbs black, the breast, insides of the arms, and circumference of the head whitish ; black band across the forehead ; a white spot at each side of the root of the tail. Sim. diana, Lin.; Exquima, Marcgr.3;(2) Audeb. 4th fam. sec. 2, pl. 6, and Buff. Supp. VII, 20. (The Roloway.) Blackish, speckled with white above, beneath white ; crupper of a pur- plish red; face black, surrounded with white; a little white beard on, the chin. Sim. cephus, Lin.; Buff. XIV, 34; Fred. Cuv. 17. (The » Moustache.) Ashy-brown; a yellow tuft before each ear; a clear blue band, resembling a reversed chevron, on the upper lip. S. petaurista, Gm.; Audeb. 4th fam. sec. 2, pl. 133 Fred. Cuv. pl. 16. (The Vaulting Monkey.) Olive-brown above, grey below; visage blue; nose white ; a white tuft before each earg a black moustache. S. nictitans, Gm.;, Audeb. ib. XIV; Fred. Cuv. 13. (The White-nosed Monkey.) Black or brown, speckled with white ; ‘white nose; face black; circumference of the lips and the eyes reddish. These last five species, all small, beautifully variegated in (1) The Cercop. barbatus of Clusius, which Linn. cites as an example of his fawnus, is rather an Ouanderow than a Malbrouc. (2) The figure annexed to the description of the Haquima in Marcgrave is that of an Ouarine, and that of the Lxguima is joined to the description of the Owarine or Guariba. This transposition has produced many errors in synonymes, 62 MAMMALIA. colour, and of a mild and gentle disposition, are very common in Guinea.(1) SemnopiTHEcus, Fred. Cuv. Differs from the Long-tailed Monkeys, by having an additional small tubercle on the last of the inferior molares. They inhabit eastern countries, and their long limbs and very long tail give them a very peculiar appearance. ‘Their muzzle projects very little more than that of the Gibbons, and like them, they have callosities on the buttocks. They appear, likewise, to have no cheek-pouches ; their larnyx is furnished with a sac. The one longest known is the Sim. nemzus, L.; Buff. XIV, 413 Fred. Cuv. pl. 12. Re- markable for its lively and varied colouring ; body and arms grey 3 hands, thighs and feet black; legs of a lively red; the tail and.a large triangular spot upon the loins, white; face orange; he has a black and red collar, and tufts of yellow hairs on the sides of the head; inhabits Cochin China.(2) Another species is remarkable for the very extraordinary form of the nose—it is the S. nasica, Schr.; Buff. Supp. VII, 11 and 12. (The Kahau.) Yellow, tinted with red; nose extremely long and projecting, in the form of a sloping spatula. This monkey inhabits Borneo, lives in great troops, which assemble morning and evening, on the branches of the great trees on the banks of the rivers—its cry is kahau. It is also said to be found in Cochin China. S. entellus, Dufres.; Fred. Cuy. pl. 8 and 9., (The Entel- lus.) A light yellowish grey; black hairs on the. eye- -brows a and sides of the head, directed forwards. From Upper Bengal. Is one of the species held in veneration by the Brahmins. S. melalophos, Raff.; F. C. pl. 7. (The Simpai.) © Fur of ° ‘a yery lively red; beneath white; face blue; a crest of peor 2 hairs reaching from one ear to the other. ” S. comata, Desm.; S. cristata, Raff.; Fr. Cuv. pl. 2. Presbitis r mitrata, Kotzeb. (The Croo.) Fine ash colour below, and the ~ ae % (1) Pennant has described certain Guenons without thumbs, Sim. Balsa and Sim. ferruginea, from which Illiger has constructed his genus Colobus, but I have not yet been able to see them, and for this reason have not mentioned them. M. Temminck assures us that their head and teeth resemble those of a Semnopithecus. (2) M. Diard having transmitted to the Museum several Doucs from Cochin Chi- na, it has been proved that they have callosities on the buttocks; a fact denied by. Buffon, on account of his having seen but one specimen injured by stuffing. The genus Lasiopyga of Mliger must consequently be suppressed, as if is based on this error. ° . QUADRUMANA. 63 tuft of the tail white; black crest on the eye-brows, and the hairs of the top of the head long and turned up, forming a tuft. S. maura, L.3 F. Cuy. pl. 10. (The Negro Monkey.) All black, the young of a brownish yellow. The three latter species are from the straits of Sunda.(1) | Macacus.(2) All the animals of this denomination have a fifth tubercle on their last molares, and callosities and cheek-pouches like a Guenon. The limbs are shorter and thicker than in a Semnopithecus ; the muzzle more projecting, and the superciliary ridge more inflated than in either the one or the other. Though docile when young, they be- come unmanageable when old. They all have asac which commu- nicates with the larynx under the thyroid cartilage, and which, when they cry out, becomes filled with air. Their tail is pendent, and takes no part in their motions: they produce early, but are not completely adult for four or five years. ‘The period of gestation is seven months—during the rutting season the labia pudendi, &c. of the females are excessively distended.(3) They are generally brought from India. Sim. silenus and leonina, L. and Gm.3; Ouanderou, Buff. ; « » Audeb. 2d fam. sect. 1, pl. 3. (The Maned Macaque.) Blacks; _ ash coloured mane and whitish beard which surround the head. From Ceylon. ' Sim. sinica, Gm.; Buff. XIV, 303; Fr. Cuv. 30. (The Chinese Monkey.) brilliant burnished steel-green, the whole of the plumage is er black. P. aurea, Sh.; Oriolus aureus, Gm.; Edw.,-1123 Vaill. 18; Vieill. 11, has none of the preceding extraordinary develop- ments of plumage, and is only distinguishable by the velvet fea- thers which cover its nostrils. The male is of the brightest orange; the throat, and primary quills of the wings, black; in ‘the female, a brown takes the place of the orange.(1) “ FAMILY IV. TENUIROSTRES. This family comprehends the remaining birds of the first divi- sion; those in which the beak is slender, elongated, sometimes straight, and sometimes more or less arcuated, and without any emargination. They are to the Conirostres what the Mota- cille are to the other Dentirostres. SITTA, Lin. The Nuthatches have a straight, prismatic, pointed beak, com- pressed near the point, which they employ like the Woodpeckers to perforate the bark of trees, and in withdrawing the larve contained in it; but their tongue is not extensible, and although they climb in every direction, they have but one toe behind, which, it is true, is a strong one. The tail is of no use in supporting them, as is the case with the Woodpeckers and True Creepers. There is but one in France. . S. europa, L.3 Enl. 623, 1; Naum. 139. (The European Nut- hatch.) Bluish ash colour above; reddish beneath; a blackish band descending behind the eye; size of a Rouge-gorge.(2) (1) { refer the Parad. gularis, Lath., or nigra, Gm.; Vaill. 20 and 21; Vieill. 8, 9, and the leucoptera, Lath. to the Thrushes;—the Par. Chalybea, Enl. 633, Sonn. 97; Vaill., 23; Vieill., 10, to the Cassicans;—the cirrhata, Aldrov. 814, is too much mutilated to be characterized, and the furcata, Lath. appears to be an imperfect specimen of the superba. (2) Add the S. @ sourcil blanc (S. canadensis, Briss.) Enl. 623, 2;—the Black- headed N. (8. canadensis, L..), Catesb., I, xxii; Vieill. Gal. 171;—S. frontalis, Swains. Zool. Ill. 2, or S. velata, Tem., Col. 72, 3, or Orthorynchus frontalis, Horsf. Jay. ;— S. chrysoptera, Lath., 3d Supp. 327;—S. pusilla, Id. Vou. I.—2 P , . 314 AVES. : 1 It has been thought necessary to separate from the Sitter, the Xenops, Illig.(1) ™ Which only differs in the beak being rather more compressed, and the inferior ridge more conyex.(2) ° * . he ANABATES, Temm. ‘ Kr In which, on the contrary, the superior ridge of the beak is some- what convex, almost like the beak of a Thrush which has no emar- gination. The tail, in some, is long and cuneiform, and occasionally | worn, a proof that it supports them in climbing.(3) 4 4 Synatiaxts, Vieill. & ‘& A straight beak, but little elongated; very much compressed, slen- der, and pointed; the tail generally long and pointed.(4) There are even some of them in which the stems of the tail-quills are very stout, and project beyond the barbs.(5) Those birds which have received the name of * - v Crerruia, Lin. Or the Creepers, have an arcuated beak, but that is the only com- mon character they possess. We separate from them in the first place, Cerruti, Cuv. te. The True Creepers, so called from their habit of climbing trees, like Woodpeckers, in doing which they make use of their tail as a prop or supporter; they are known by the quills of the tail, which are worn, and terminate in a stiff point, like those of the same birds. There is one found in Europe, (1) Vieillot has changed this name into Neops. (2) Xenops rutilus, Licht., Col. 72, 2, or WVeops ruficauda, Vieill. Gal. 170; Xenops Hofmanseggit, Col. 150, 1, Vaill. Prom. 31, 2; 5—Aenops anabatoides, Col. 150, 2. (3) Anabates cristatus, Spix, 84;—An. rufifrons, Id. 85, 1;—Philydor rujicollis, Id. 75;—Phil. albogularis, \d., 74;—Phil. superciliaris, 1d. 73; perhaps the same as the Anabates amaurotis, Tem. Col. 238, 2;—Sphenura striolata, Spix, 83, 2, or . Anabates' striolatus, Tem. Col. 23, 1 } ' (4) Synallawis ruficapilla, Vieill. Gal. 174, or Parulus ruficeps, Spix, 86, from which the Syn. albescens, Tem. Col. 227, 2, and the cinerascens, lb., 3, do not appear to me to differ specifically ;—Syn. rutilans, Col. 227, 1;—Syn. tessellata, Col. 311, 1;—Syn. setaria, Ib. 2;-—Prinia familiaris, Horsf. Jav.’—The Fluteur, Vaill. Afr. 112, or Malurus africanus, Swains. Ill. 170, merely has a somewhat higher beak. (5) Dendrocolaptes sylviellus, Temm. Col. 72,1. Vaill. prom. 31, 2 ae PASSERINA. ONG * C. familiaris, L.; Enl. 681, 13 Naum. 140. (The European Creeper.) A small bird with whitish plumage, spotted with brown.above; rump and tail tinged with red. It builds in the hollows of trees, and climbs with great rapidity, searching for insects and larve in the cracks of the bark, under mosses,’ &c.(i) America produces several True Creepers of a large size, called, Drnprocotarres, Herm.(2)—Grimpars, Vaill. Whose tail is the same, but their beak is much stronger and wider.(3) There is even one of them which approaches the Nuthatches in its straight and compressed beak; it might be taken for a Sitta with a worn tail.(4) The beak of another, twice as long as the head, is only arcu- ated at the end.(5) That of a third is long, sides and as much arcuated as in Melithreptus.(6) TrcHopRoma, Illig.(7) The tail not worn, although they climb along walls and rocks just as the common Creepers do upon trees, but they cling to them (1) Add, C. cinnamomea, Vieill. Ois. Dor. 62, and Galer. 173;—Motacilla spini- cauda, Lath. Syn. II, pl. 52? (2) Dendrocolaptes, the Greek name of the Woodpecker. Vieillot has changed it into Denprocorvs, Gal. 175, and applied it to another division. (3) The Picucule, Buff. (Gracula cayennensis, Gm.; Grac. scandens, Lath. & Sh. )- . Enl. 621 and Vieill. Ois. Dor. 76, to which the Dendroc. decumanus, Spix, 87, and . falcirostris, 88, are at least dlosely allied. Add, the Grand Grimpart, Vaill. 42;— Dendrec. tenuirostris, Spix, 91, 2;—D. bivittatus, 90, 1;—D. Wagleri, 90, 2;—the Gr. maillé, Vaill. 29, 2;—the Grimpart flambé, Vaill. Prom. 30, or Dend. platyros- tris, Spix, 89?—the Gr. enfumé, Vaill. 28. N.B. The Fluteur of Vaill., Afr. 112, is the genus Dasyornis of Swainson. The Dendrocolaptes Sylviellus, Tem. is his genus Srrrasomus and the Certhia maculata of Wils. III, xix, 3, his genus Oxyexossus. The Dendroprocurvus, Tem. is the genus X1rnornyNenvs, Swains. and the Ta- lapiot, his genus Denpror.ex. (4) The Talapiot, Buff.; Oriolus picus, Gm. and Lath.; Gracula picoides, Sh., Enl. 605, or Dendrocolaptes guttatus, Spix, 91,1. (5) The Nasican, Vaill., Prom., etc., 24. (6) The Grimpart promerops (Dendrocolaptes procurvus,) Tem. Col. 28 or Den- drocopus falcularius, Vieill. Gal. 175. (7) These birds are called Echeleites in some of the French provinces. Vieillot has changed this name into Picchion, and that of Iliger into Perroproma. : a 316 AYES. ” with their great claws. The beak is triangular and depressed at . base, very long and very slender. . One species only is known, which inhabits the south of Eu- rope, Certhia muraria, L.; Enl. 372; Naum. 141. It is a pretty bird of a light ash aibhgy the coverts and edges of a part of the wing-quills bright red. The throat of the male is black.(1) : Necranrini, Illig. Tail not worn, nor are these birds climbers, but their moderately long, arcuated, pointed and compressed beak resembles that of the Creepers. They are all foreign to Europe. The name of Guircurts is more particularly applied to cer- tain small species, the males of which are ornamented with lively colours. Their tongue is filamentous and bifid.(2) We may separate from them the largest and least beautiful species, whose tongue is short and cartilaginous. Merops rufus, Gm.; Enl. 739; Figulus albogularis, Spix, 78. _A bird from South America, the size of a Kingfisher, reddish above, with a whitish throat, which constructs a nest upon shrubs, arched over like an oven.(3) Diczum, Cuv.(4) The tail not worn, neither do they climb; their sharp pointed, (1) Certh. fusca, Lath. Vieill. 65, appears to me to belong to this subgenus. (2) Certh. cyanea, Enl. 83, 2; Vieill., 41, 42, 43 and Gal. 176;—cerulea, Edw. 21, Vieill., 44, 45, 46, two American species, to which we must probably add some from the East, most of which are red, as C. sanguinea, Vieill. 66;—C. cardi- nalis, Id., 54, 58;—C. borbonica, Enl. 681, 2;—Vieill.*Gal. 167, has given to these birds the name of Correba. N.B. C. armillata, Sparm. 36;—C. cayana, 682, 2, &c. are mere varieties of the cyanea or of the cxrulea. (3) This bird is the type of the genus Ornrz or Orrrionnyxcnos of Tem.; Fur- nantivs, Vieill. Gal. 182. The genus Ficutus, Spix, does not differ from it. Add the Picchion-baillon, Viell, Gal. 172;—Pomatorhinos montanus, Horsf. Jav.;—Po- mat. turdinus, T. Col. 441;—Pom. trivirgatus, T. Col. 443;—Climacteris picum- nus, Tem. Col. 281, 1;—Clim. scandens, Ib. 2;—Certhia flaveola, Edw. 122, 362, Vieill. 51;—C. varia (Mot. varia, L.), Edw. 30, 2; Vieill. 74, which is the Mnio- tille varié, Id. Gal. 169;—C. semitorquata, Vieill. 56;—the Promerops olivatre, Vaill. Huppes et Prom. pl. v (Mer. olivaceus, Sh.).—Here, also, is the place, I sus- — pect, for the C. virens, Vieill. 57 and 58, and sannio, Id. 64, which I have not seen, but which are distinguished by their slightly forked tails. + ; (4) The name of a very small bird in the Indies, according to Elian. To this subgenus belong, Certh. erythronotos, Viell. Il, 35. The C. eruentata, Edw. 81, is probably a different age of the same;—C. rubra, Vieill: pl. liy, of which the C. “fy : PASSERINE. 317 ‘ arcuated beak, which is not longer than the head, is depressed and : widened at base. They inhabit the East Indies, are very small, and grerally have some: scarlet i in their plumage. Meuirureptus, Vieill. The tail not worn; beak extremely long, and curved almost into a semicircle. From the South Sea Islands. One of them, Certhia vestiara, Sh.; Vieill. Ois. Dor. II, pl. 52, and Gal. 181, is covered with scarlet feathers used by the Sandwich islanders in the manufacture of the beautiful mantles of that colour, which they so highly prize.(1) Cryyynis, Cuy.(2) Tail not worn; edges of the two mandibles of the long and very slender beak, finely serrate; the tongue, which is susceptible of protrusion, terminates in a little fork. They are small birds, the males of which, during the nuptial season, are ornamented with metallic colours, approaching in lustre to those of the Humming- bird, of which, in this respect, they are the représentatives in the eastern continent, they being principally found in Africa and the archipelago of India. They live on the nectar of flowers, which they suck up with their bills; their disposition is lively, and their notes very agreeable. The beauty of their plumage has made them acommon ornament of our cabinets, but as it is very different in both sexes during the winter, &c. it becomes an extremely difficult matter to characterize the species. The tail, in most of them, is equal.(3) erythropygia, Lath. 2d supp., is probably the female;—the Wecturinia rubicosa, Tem. Col. f. 2. and 3, does not appear to differ from it—€. taniata, Sonner. Tl, Voy. pl. cvii, fig. 3;—C. cantillans, Ib. Id. 2;—Motacilla hirwndinacea, Sh. Nat. Misc. No, 114. (1) Add Certh. obscura, Vieill. Ois. Dor. II, pl. liti; —C. pacifica, Id. pl. Ixiii; the other species of this naturalist belong to very different genera, chiefly to the Phi- ledons, &c. (2) The Greek name of some very small unknown bird. The natives of Mada- gascar call them Souz-mangat, i. ec. eat-sugar. Vieillot has adopted the above name and genus, Gal. 177. . (3) Certh. splendida, Sh. Vieill. 82;—C. caffia, Edw. 347;—C. superba, Vieill. 22;—C. lotenia, Enl. 575, 2, 3, Vieill. 34;—amethystina, Vieill. 5 and 6;—chalybea, Enl. 246, 3, Vieill- 10, 13, 18, 24, 34, 80;—ommnicolor, Seb. 1, 69, 5;—cuprea, Vieill. 23;—purpurata, Edw. 265, Vieill. 11;—cyanocephala, Vieill. 7;—Z. zetlon- ica, Enl. 576, 4; Vieill. 29, 30;—dubia, Vieill. 81;—senegalensis, Vieill. 8;—spe- rata, Enl. 246, 1, 2; Vieill. 16, 32, of which the lepida of Sparm. 35, is the female ;— madagascariensis, Vieill. 18;—currucaria, Enl. 576, 3, Vieill. 31;—rubro-fusca, Vieill. 27;—fuliginosa, Vieill. 20;—maculata, Vieill. 21;—venusta, Vieill. 79;— 318° Aves. oo In some, the two middle feathers are the longest ‘in the male.(1) : We may also distinguish those ithich have a straight beak, oF one that is nearly so.(2) ARAcCHNOTHERA, Temm. The long and arcuated beak of the Cinnyris, but stronger, and without emargination; the tongue short and cartilaginous; they are only found in the Archipelago of India, and feed on Spiders.(3) Trocuinus, Lin. The Hummingbirds, so celebrated for the metallic lustre of their plumage, and chiefly for those plates, brilliant as precious stones, which are formed by scaly feathers of a peculiar structure, on their throat or head, have a long slender beak, enclosing a tongue, which they can protrude at will, like that of the Woodpeckers, (and by the same mechanism,) which is split almost to its base, forming two filaments employed, as is asserted, in taking up the nec- tar from flowers. They also, however, feed on small insects, for we have found their stomach filled with them. Their very small feet, broad tail, excessively long and narrow wings, short humerus and large sternum, which is without emargination, all contribute to form a system adapted for great power of flight, similar to that of the Swallows. The narrowness of their wing is caused by the rapid abbreviation of its quills. By these means, they balance themselves ; gutturalis, 578, 9;—Nectarinia solaris, Tem. Col. $41, 3;—eximia, Tem. Col. 138, 1, 2;—pectoralis, 1d. Col. 138, 3;—lepida, Lath., Col. 126, 1, and Vieill, Gal. 177, 2;—Hasselti, T. Col. 376, 3;—coccinogaster, Tem. Col. 388, 3;—Cinn. eques, Less. and Garn. Voy. de la Coq. pl. xxxi, f. 1;—javanica, Zool. Ill. 121; some of which birds are probably mere varieties of the others. (1) Certhia famosa, L. Enl. 83, 1;—C. pulchella, Enl. 670, 1;—C. violacea, 670, 2;—the Sucrier cardinal, Vaill. Ap. 291;—the Sucrier figuier, Id. 293, f. 2;—Necta- rinia metallica, Licht. Ruppel., pl. vii and Col. 347, 1;—Vect. sie cals T..Col. 126, 3;—V. Kuhlii, T. Col. 376, 1, 2. (2) Cinnyris elegans, Vieill. Gal. 177, or Certh. rectirostris, Id. Ois. Dor. II, pl. Ixxy. (3) gricinctent longirostra, Tem. Col. 84, 1;—A. inornata, Id. Ib. 2. N.B. After all these distinctions, we have still to remove from the great genus Crrrara, the C. lunafa, Vieill. 61;—C. Novex-Hollandiz, J. White, New 8. W. pl. xvi and Ixy; Vieill., 57, and 71;—C. australasiana, Vieill. 55;—C. carunculata, Vieill. 69, 70;—C. auriculata, Vieill. 85;—C. cocincinica, Enl. 643, Vicill. 77, 785 C. spiza, Enl. 578, 2, Edw. 25;—C. seniculus, Vieill. 50;—C. graculina, Vieill. 87;—C. goruck, Vieill. 88;—C. cxrulea, Vieill. 83;—C. xanthotis, Vicill. 84;—C. mellivora, Vieill. 86; which, by their emarginated beak and pencil-like tongue, are all Philedons. Wi PASSERINE. 319 in air with nearly as much facility as certain Flies, and it is thus that they hum about flowers and fly with more proportionate ra- pidity than any other bird. Their gizzard is very small, and they have no czcum, an additional mark of their affinity with the Wood- peckers. They live'singly, defend their nests with courage, and fight desperately with each other. _ The name of Trocuitus, Lac., is especially reserved for such as have the beak arcuated; some of them are distinguished by the pro- longation of the intermediate quills of their tail. We will mention but one of the largest and most beautiful. Troch. pella; Colibri Topaze, Enl. 596. Purple-maronne; head, black; throat of the most brilliant topaz-yellow, changing into green, surrounded by black.(1) The lateral quills of the tail are very long in others;(2) several have tails moderately forked;(3) in the greater number it is round “or square.(4) We call, t ‘ OrrHORHYNcHts, Lacep. - Such as have a straight beak; some of them have tufted heads.(5) Others have tufts or elongated feathers on the sides of the head,(6) and among them are found some with a pointed and very long tail.(7) (1) Add Z'r. superciliosus, Enl. 600, 3; Vieill. 17, 18, 19;—Tr. leuwcurus, Enl. 600, 3;—7'. squalidus, Natterer, Col. 120, f. 1;—T'r. brasiliensis, Lath. Col. 120, poy “ (2) Tr. forficatus, Edw. 33, Vieill. 30;—polithmus, Edw. 34, Vieill. 67, and particularly the magnificent Peruvian species, with the refulgent gold tail, Tr. chrysurus, Cuv. (3) Tr. elegans, Vieill. 14. (4) Tr. mango, L. ; Enl. I, 680, 2 and 3, Vieill. 7;—Zr. nzvius, Dumont, Col. 120, f. 3; Tr. gutturalis, Enl. 671;—T'. tawmantias, Enl. 600, 1;—T*r. violaceus, Enl. 600, 2;—Z'r. cinereus, Vieill. 5;—Z'r- melanogaster, Vieill. 75;—T'r. jugularis, Sh. Edw. 266, 1; Vieill. 4;—7Z'r. holosericeus, Sh., Vieill. 6 and 65;—T'r. punctatus, Sh., Vieill. 8;—T'. pectoralis, Sh. 9 and 70;—T'r. aurulentus, Sh. Vieill. 12;—7T'r. aureo- viridis, Sh., Vieill. 15;—7'r. hirsutus, Gm. or brasiliensis, Sh. Vieill. 20;—T’r. albus, Vieill. 11;—7%. viridis, Vieill. 15;—T?. margaritaceus, Enl. 680, 1, Vieill. 16;—T'r. multicolor, Gm. or Harlequin Hummingbird, Lath. Supp. pl. cxi, Vieill. 79:—Tr. lazulus, Vieill. Gal. 179. , (5) Tr. cristatus, Edw. 37; Enl. 227, 1; Vieill. 47, 48;—T'r. pileatus (puniceus, Gm.) Vieill. 63;—7'. Lalandii, Vieill. 18, f. 1 and 2;—Orthor. stephanioides, Less. and Garn. Voy. de la Coquille, pl. xxxi, No. 2. (6) Zr. ornatus, Enl. 640, 3, Vieill. 49, 50;—TZ%. chalybeus, Vieill. 66, f. 2;— Tr. petasophorus, P. Max. Col. 203, 3;—TZr. scutatus, Natter., Col. 299, 3;—T'r. magnificus, lig. Col. 299, 9.7, mesoleucos, Temm. Col. 317. , (7) Tr. bilophus, Temm. N.B. M. Swainson has named those of our Hummingbirds, the middle quills of whose tail are elongated, Pumrornis; those with a round or square tail, Lamror- 320 AVES. Ps The stems of the primary wing-quills are singularly widened in some of them,(1) and among those which have none of these orna- ments, we may still distinguish the fork- -tailed species,(2) some of which have their very long lateral quills widened at the end.(3 Among those which have a square or’slightly emarginated tail, there is one worthy of notice from its extreme smallness, the : ’ Troch. minimus, Enl. 276, 1; Edw. 1053 Vieill. 64. It is of : a violet-grey colour, and about the size of a Bee. LF Another, on the contrary, because it is the largest of the ‘wiole genus, the 2 Troch. gigas, Vieill., Gal. 180, which is almost equal in size to the Hirundo apus.(4) Urupa, Lin. In this genus we will first place, Freciius, Cuv.(5) : ‘ i Where the nostrils are covered with feathers directed forwards, from which circumstance several authors have placed these birds with the Crows, which they also somewhat resemble in their, man- “ners; their beak is a little longer than the head. Corvus graculus, L.; Le crave d’Europe, En). 255; Naum. 57, 2; Vieill. Galer. 163. The size of a Crow; black; red feet and beak; wings reaching to the end of the tail or extending beyond nis; the straight beaked ones, in which the quills of the ‘wings are inflated, Campyroprervs; and those with a forked tail, CynanTuus. (1) Tr. latipennis, Enl. 672, 2; Vieill. 21;—T'r. ensipennis, Swains. Zool. Il. 107;—T’r. falcatus, Ib. 82. (2) Z'r. mellivorus, Enl. 640; Edw. 35, Vieill. 23, 24;—T'r. amethystinus, Gm. . Enl. 672, 1;—7%. furcatus, Enl. 509, 2; Vieill. 34;—T'. forficatus, Vieill. 60;—Tr. smaragdo-saphirinus,V ieill. 36, 40;—T*r. colubris, Edw. 38; Catesb. 65; Vieill. 31, 32, 33;—Tr. Maugeanus, Vieill. 37, 38;—Tr. Langsdorifii, Vieill. 66, 1;—T'r. enicurus, Vieill. 66, 3;—7'r. mediastinus, Tem. Col. 317;—Orthor. cora, Less. and Garn. 34, 4. (3) Tr. platurus, Vieill. 52. (4) Other species with square, or but slightly emarginated tails: Tr. mosquitus, L., Enl. 227, 2;—T'r. carbunculus, Vieill. 54;—T'r. ourissia, Enl. 227, 3;—T'r. mel- lisugus, L. Enl. 640, 2;—7'r. rubineus, Gm. Enl. 276, 4, Vieill. 27;—T'r. auritus, Sh. Vieill. 25;—7'r. collaris, Vieill. 61, 62;—T'r. superbus, Sh.; longirostris, Vieill. 59, Col. 299, 1;—Tr. mellivorus, I, Enl. 640, 2;—T'r. leucogaster, Gm. Vieill. 43;— Tr. imbricatus, Gm. Vieill. 221;—T*. albirostris, Vieill. 45;—T*. viridis, Vieill. 41;— Tr. maculatus, Vieill. 44;—T'r. saphyrinus, Sh. Vieill. 35 and 57, 2;—Tr. squa- mosus, Tem. Gol. 203, 1;—T'r. albicollis, ¥, Col. 203, 2;—Orthor. Amasili, Less. and Garn. Voy. de la Coq. 31, 3. (5) Vieillot has changed this name for Coractas, which, according to Linnzus, is that of the Rollers. PASSERINE. oye it. It inhabits the highest ridges of the Alps and Pyrenees, nestling there among the cliffs or in the fissures of the rocks like the Chocard; it is less common, however, and does not so often unite in flocks. It feeds both on fruit and insects, and when it descends into the valleys, s snow or bad weather may be ex- pected.(1) | . Urupa, properly so styled. The Hoopoes haye an ornament on the head formed of a double range of long feathers, which they can erect at will. There is one in Europe, U. epops, L.; Enlv 52; Naum. 142. (The Hoopoe.) A vinous- red; 3 wings and tail, black; two transverse, white bands on the coyerts of the wings, and four on the quills. It seeks insects in humid earth, lays its eggs in holes of trees or of walls, and “leaves France in winter (2) U. capensis; Eni. 697. (The Cape Hoopoe:) More particu-— larly allied to Fregilus by the anterior, short, and immovable feathers of its tuft which incline forwards and cover the nostrils. Fé ° af, os. ** . Promenrors, Briss. No crest on the head, and a very long tail; the tongue, extensible and forked, enables it, as is affirmed, to live on the nectar of flowers, like the Cinnyris and the ae is as (3) *eisay yd an, é r A me) It is impossible to say what combination of the history of this bird with i im- he erfect figures, perhaps of some Curlew, gave birth to the ideal species of the age ravé huppé or Sonneur (Corvus eremita, L.), a pretended bird of Switzerland, which has never been seen by any one since Gesner. But the Corv. affinis, Lath. appears / 4° be a true Fregilus, and we havea totally black Species from N ew Holland. (2) Add the African species, Upupa minor, Vieill. Prom. pl. ii, and Gal, pl. 184; _Vaill. Prom. 23. rng i, (3) Vieill. Galer. .pl. clxxxv, has changed Promerops into Falcinellus. "The only one well known is the Upupa promerops or Merops caffer, ¥:nl. 637, which is the Sucrier du protea, Vaill. Afr. 139. M. Vaill. is of opinion thatthe Up. fusca, Gm., or papuensis, Lath. Enl. 638, is the female of the Epimaque 2 parements frisés, Enl. * 639.—The Up. paradisea, Seb. 1, pl. xxx, 8, is the Muscicapa paradisi, with an ill drawn beak. The Up. aurantia, Seb. I, lxvi, 5, according to all appearance a Cassicus. The mexicana, Seb. I, xlv, 5, is not from Mexico as Seba makes it out, _ by applying"to it a passage of Nicremberg, lib. x, c. 44, in w hich he merely speaks of a Duck. Iam in doubt whether to place here the Promerops ceruleus, Shaw; _ _ Prom. bleu, Vieill.; Upupa Indica, Lath. or to approximate it to the Up. erythro- _rhynchos. Vout. 1L—2Q : 322 AVES. > + dul s- weer a Epimacuus, Cuv.(1)" \ The beak of the Upupa and Promerops alee with scaly or velvet feathers which partially cover the nostrils as in the Birds of Para- dise; they are natives of the same, countries, and their plumage equally brilliant. The flank-feathers of the hai also more or less elongated. 7 ay Upupa magna, Gm.; U. superba, Tait sh Pepinteque’ a pare. frisés, Enl. 6393 Vailk Dini 13.. Black; tail tapered, thrice the length of the body; the feathers on theflanks,,elongated, turned up; frizzled, the edges of a burnighey steel-blue, which also” glistens on the head and belly.(2) Naturalists have distinguished the square- se Pon of Swainson, such as, _Ep. albus; Paradis. tie liter Abb. 96; ‘Val Ois. d de Par. pl: 16 and 17, and better Promer. 175,Vieill. 1. 13, and better Gal. 185, which, for a long time, was placed among the» Birds of Paradise, on account of the long bunches of white plumes, which decorate its flanks, the stems of these plumes. being continued out, forming six filaments onjeach, si % The ‘body is usually of a violet black, and the feathers ; on the eo of the breast have an edging or border of emerald’ It appears, however, that there are varieties with an me body. The primaries of the wing are-short, and much less merous than in birds generally. * Epim. magnificus, Cuv.; Epimaque proméfil, Vaill, tins 16. Velvet-blacks tail, slightly forked; head and breast of a most i brilliant steel-blue; feathers on the ee long, frinert = black. Epim. regius, Less and Garn., Voy. de Duperr., pl. 283 Phi: loris paradisceus, Swains. A purple blacks top of the head and » ” ‘upper part of the breast of a fine brilliant green; feathers on the © flanks, Popades and edged with green. 2h eee « The second fees smallest division of the Passeeues compre- ‘hends those in which the external toe, which is nearly as long (1) Epimachus, the Greek name of a beautiful undetermined East Indian ae (2) I hardly know whether I should place the Promerar, Vaill., 8 ‘ant 9 Promerup, Vaill., 11 and 12, and his Promerops.siffleur, 10, here, or near the | erythorhynchos. These beautiful birds of New Guinea, which are very rare in our collections, are usually deprived of their feet, which renders it inner them with certainty. *, 5. . FASSERIN &. 323 as the middle one, is united to it as far as the penultimate ar- ticulation. We make but a single group of them, the * SYNDACTYLZ, Which. has long been divided into five genera. % *Merops, Lin. The Bee-eaters eae an Beas beak, triangular at base, slightly arcuated and terminating in a sharp point. There is a double emar- gination on each side of the hind part of the sternum. Their long, pointed wings, and short feet render their flight similar to that of Swallows. They pursue insects in great flocks, especially bees,’ wasps, &c. and it is remarkable, they are never stung by them. » There is a species, common in the south of Europe, but rare towards the north, the M. apiaster, L.; Guépier commun, En. Ban938; Naum. 143 ;-Vaill., Guep., 1 and 2. (The Common Bee- ’ eater.) A pedhtiful bird with a fawn coloured back; front and belly of a sea-green blue; throat yellow, surrounded with black. oe . it builds in holes excavated by itself along the: banks of streams, : which are from four to five feet in depth. The young birds re- -main a long time in this retreat with their parents, which in- duced the ancients to belieye that the former supported the . latter when worn out with age. - The two middle quills of its tail are somewhat jeamumenad, the first indication of a much greater elongation in the greater \ part of the species foreign to Europe.(1) The tail of several species, however, is nearly scmeeeana or slightly forked,(3) though this sometimes depends upon their condition when killed. * o : (1) Such are: Mer. viridis, 740, Vaill. 4;—ornatus, Lath.;—superbus, Nat. Misc. . 78;—senegalensis, Enl. 314, and badiws, 252, Vaill, 12, 13; ;—superciliosus, 259, Vaill. 19.—M. nubicus, Vaill. 5, Enl. 649; this individual had been deprived of its long quills. —M. Savignii, Vaill. 6—M. Cuvieri, Vaill. 9, and Swains. ll. 76, under the name of Savignii—M. Lamark, Vaill. 10. (2) Merops philippinus, Eni. 57;—M. cayennensis, 454 (N.B. That it is not from ~-Cayenne).—WM. nubicus, 649;—M. erytropterus, 318;—M. malimbicus, Sh. or bicolor, Daud. Ann. du Mus. J, Ixii, and Vaill. 5, Vieill. Gal. 186;—J/. gularis, Nat. Mise. * 387;—WM. amictus, T. Col. 310;—M. Daudin, Vaill. 14.— J. cor omandus, Lath. Son- ¥ ye nerat, Voy. 2, 105, or G. cytrin, Vail. 11;—WV. quinticolor, Vaill. 15;—M. minulus, Vaill. 17;—M. Lechenaud, Vaill. 18;—M. Bullock, Vaill. 20. (3) ©. taivd, Vaill. 8—M. urica, Swains. Zool. Ul. 8. N.B. The Merops conge- ner, Aldr. I, 876, is not very authentic;—the cafer, Gm. is the pupiiadelaaps: ;—the brasiliensis, Seb. J, lxvi, 1, is most probably an Icterus;—the M. monachus, cornicu- Jatus, cyanops, are Gymnops;—the Mer. phricius. eincinnalus, cucullatus, cyanops, Se 3234 AVES. We should approximate to the. Be: eaters certain long-tailed birds, with metallic-coloured plumage, hitherto classed with Pro- “merops, but whose two external toes are almost as extensively united as those of the former.(1) ° a 4 There appears to be none of this genus in America, where they are represented in some respects by the ; 4 ; Prionires, Illig. 6 The Motmots have their feet and carriage,. but differ in the beak which is stronger, the edges of both mandibles being serrated, and in their tongue, which, like that of the Toucans, is barbed. They are beautiful birds, as large as the Magpie; the plu age on the head, loose as in the Jays, and a long cuneiform tail; the stems of the two middle quills being stripped of their barbs for a short distance near the extremities, gives to the whole a singular appearance. They fly badly, are solitary, build in holes, feed on insects, and’even on small 4 birds.(2) * : Py * v Aucepo, Lin. ) , 7 ¢ The Kingfishers have shorter feet than the Bee- -eaters, and the beak much longer, which is straight, angular, and pointed; the | tongue and tail are yery short. There are two emarginations in their ee sternum, as in those of the Bee-eaters and the Rollers. They feed on small fish which they capture by precipitating themselves into” the water from some branch where they have remained perched, watching for their prey. Their stomach is a membranous sac. They nestle like Bee-eaters in holes on the banks of streams, and are found in both continents. The European species, : A. ispida; Enl. 77; Naum. 144. The size of a Finch; sreenioh ; ‘a @ garrulus, fasciculatus, carunculatus, of Lath. appear to us to be Philedons; we have even ascertained this to be the fact with respect to most of them;—the M. cine- reus, Seb. XXXI, 10, is along tailed Cinnyris or Sowi-manga. (1) The Promerops moqueur, Vaill. Prom. 1, 2, and 4 (Upupa erythrorhynchos, — Lath.). The young bird has a black beak.—The Prom. namaquois, Vaill. 5 and 6, or Falein.. cyanomelas, Vieill. (2) The Blue-headed Motmot, or the Houtou sot Guyana, Guira, guaynumbi of - the Brazilians, according to Marcgrave (Ramphastos momota, Gm.); or Pr. brasiliz ensis, Wig. Enl. 370; Vaill. Ois.. de Par. &c. I, pl. xxxvii and xxxvili;—the Motmot a tete rousse or of Peru;,Motmot dombey, Vaill. loc. cit. pl. xxxix, and Vieill. Gal. pl. exe;—Pr, Marcii, Spix, 9;—the T'utre of Paraguay, Azz. No. 52, ate, to say the least, closely allied to it. ip Motmot, according to Fernandez, is the Méxican name of the first. Prionitis, from 7eiay, saw, a name Biv en by Illiger. Me Vieillot has changed it into Barr- PHONUS. * , $ PASSERINE, 9 ds 325 waved with black above; underneath, and a band on wn side of the neck, reddish; a wide band of the most beautiful. aqua- marina blue along the back. i The species foreign to Europe have ee a. smooth plumage variegated with different shades of blue and green. ‘ They may be distinguished among themselves by the beak, which in some is simply straight and pointed as in the common species,(1) and in others, has an inflated lower mandible.(2) Of those found in New Holland and its neighbouring coun- tries, some have a mandible hooked at the point.(3) The greyish - and dull plumage of several of the latter is an indication of their not visiting the water, and in fact they feed on insects. Cryx, Lacep. Kingfishers with the usual beak, but in which the internal toe is deficient. Three species are found in India.(4) og ee Topus, Lin. a The Todies are small birds: of ‘America Pasaer litte the King- fishers in their general form. as well as in their feet and elongated beak, but the latter is horizontally flattened, and obtuse at the point. tin a Ry a re ‘a Ale. (afra, Sh.) maxima, Enl. 679; ;—aleyon, 715 and 593, and Wils., Am. Til, _XXXill, 1;—torquata, 284;—rudis, 62 and 716; ;—bicolor, 592;—americana, 591;— bengalensis, Edw., I;—ceruleo-cephala, Enl. 356, 2;—cristata, 756, 1;—madagas- cariensis, 778, 1;—purpured, 778, 2;—superciliosa, 756, 1 and 2;—cinerifrons, Vieill. Gal. 187;—Biru, Horsf. Jav., and T. Col. 289, 1;—semi-torquata, Swains. Il. 154;— asiatica, Ib. 50. $ 2) Al, capensis, 599; ;—atricapilla, 673;—smirnensis, 232 and 894, one of the two species distinguished by Aristotle;—dea, 116, of which Vigors makes -his genus TanysiereRa;—chlorocephala, 783, 2;—coromanda, Somer. 218;—leucocephala (ja- wanica, Sh.), 757;—senegalensis, 594 and 356; ;—cancrophaga, Sh. 334;—melanor- “hyncha,,T. Col. 391; s—omnicolor, T. Col., 135;—diops, Id. Col. 212;—Dacelo con-. hee Id. Col. 346;—Dacelo cinnamominus, Swains. Ill., 67. It is from this division . hat M. Leach has made his genus Dacexo. NB. In several of the fig. Enl. the beaks ate not sufficiently inflated. _ (3) Alcedo fusca (gigantea, Sh.), Enl. 663; Vieill. Gal. 188;—Dacelo pulchella, Horsf. Jay. and T. Col. 262;—Dac. Gaudichaud, Quoy and Gaym. Voy. de Freycin. mpl. xxy- ___N.B. M. Lesson separates the species with denticulated beaks from the Ring- " shers , by the name of Syma; and by that of Topiramruts, those whose beak is a Bice depressed and without a ridge, such as Alcedo sacra, Lath. See his Mem, pos those of the Soc. d’Hist. Nat. tom. III, pl. xi and xii. | (4) Aleedo trydactyla, Pall. and Gm.; Pall., Spic., VI, pl. U, f. 2; Sonner. pl. -xxxii; ;—Ale. tribrachys, Sh. Nat. Misc. XVI, pl. 681;—Ale. meninting, Horsf., Col, 239, 2. h wa) — s * = * 326 3 AVES. . é The tarsus also is higher, and the tail not so short. They feed on “flies and build on the ground.(1) We ‘terminate the history of this order with the most singular of its genera, a Spe which has not as much resemblance to the other Sy dactyla as they have to each other, and one which may very properly be ge to form a particular family. It is the ° oo @ Buewkos, Lin. The Hornbills are large birds of Africa and India, whose enormous dentated beak is studded with excrescences which sometimes equal in size the beak itself, and which are always of considerable ‘ex- tent above. This renders them 4 very remarkable, and allies them to the Toucans, while, at the | same time, their carriage and habits approximate them to the e Crows, fe their feet to the Bee-eaters and the Kingfishers. The shape. of these excrescences on the beak varies with age, and in the very young bird they are not even visi- ble; the interior is generally cellular, The sternum is slightly emar- ginated behind, on both sides. The tongue is small and a at the bottom of the throat; they live on all sorts of food, eat soft fruits, © hunt mice, small ae reptiles, and do not even despise carrion.(2), 2 ta” , ¥ Wy 4 i Pete! hs a (1) Zodus viridis, Enl. 585, 1 and oh and Vieill. Gal aot Po oat 783, 1. 3 . Authors have very improperly placed among the Todies, true eee, with an emarginated beak and the external toe free, such as the Todus regius, Enl. 289;—paradiseeus, Ib., 234; ;—leucocephalus, Pall. Spic., VI, iii, 2;—the two Pra- ryrutncr of Desmarets, which are the 7'od. rostratus and nasutus of Shaw, or T'od. platyrhynchos and macrorhynchos, Gm. Vieill., gives the fete Ge 126. (2) Horneitts wiru Excrescences. Buc. rhinoceros, Enl. 954, Vaill. Callaosy 1 and 2; B. africanus, Vaill., pl. 17, f. 2, may be a mere variety from age; niger, Vaill., 13, according to Tem. is a badly preserved specimen of the same;—mono- ceros, Sh. Enl. 873; Vaill. 9, 10, 11, 12;—cassidix, Temm. Col. 210;—malabaricus, Lath. VI, ii, or albirostris, Sh.; Vaill. Col. 14;—0uccinator, T. Col. 284;—gingiants, Sonn. Voy. I, pl. cxxi; Vaill., 15; ;—bicornis, Vaill.v7, the adult female; cavatus, “Id. 4; is the male at a middle age. ~The pl. 3 and 5 are altered specimens of the same.—B. hydrocorax, F.nl. 282; the. young bird; Col. 283, the adult;—violaceus, Id. 19;—abyssinicus, Enl. 779, the middle age; Vaill. Afr. 250, 231, the adult; Vieill. Gal. 191;—sulceatus, T. Col. 69;—panayensis, Enl. 780, the female, and 781 the old male; Vaill. Col. 16, 17, 18; manillensis, Enl. 891, should be ‘the young’ bird;— —fasciatus, Vaill. Afr. 233;—exaratus, T. Col. 211. a -Hornsiiis witsour Excrescences. B. javanicus, Vaill. Cal. 22, the Oe male; Afr. 239, the old male, same as the Cul. de Waidjiou, Labill. Voy., B. undu- latus, Vaill. Cal. 20 and 21, are females of the same; B. erythrorhynchos, En. 260; Vaill. Afr. 238, the young one;—/ustatus, Cuv.! Enl. 890, Vaill. 236, 237;—core- ee Vaill. Afr. 204; 235;—bengalensis, Cal. 23. ‘ ‘ 1s 4 ve Lay SCANSORIA. ade OPE ORDER TI ghee SCANSORIAY fA eh ae me This order is composed of ‘those birds rribse external toe. is directed backwards like the thumb, by which conformation they are the better enabled to support the weight of their bodies, and of which certain genera take advantage in cling- ing to and climbing upon trees. It is from this that they have received the common name of Climbers,which in strict- ness is not applicable to all of them, as there are many true Climbers which by the disposition of their toes cannot belong to this order, instances of which we have already seen in the Creeper and Nuthatch. , The Seansorize usually nestle in the hollows of old trees 5 their powers of flight are middling; their food, like that of the Passerine, consists of insects or fruit, in proportion as their beak is more or es stout; some of them, the Wood- ‘peckers for instance, have peculiar means for obtaining it. ’ The hind part of theysternum, i in most of the genera, has a , double emargination 5 in the Parrots, there is merely a hole, and. very often that'is completely filled up. Ms *% rian) # : “i” mJ fit. he ay - ~*. Gaaua, Briss. ‘The Jacamars are closely allied to’ the Kingfishers by their elon- ga d sharp- -pointed beak, the upper ridge of which is angular, and "Y ir short feet, the anterior toes of which are almost wholly united; ‘these toes, however, are not precisely the same as those of , the Kingfishers; abeit plumage moreover is not so smooth, and Seite ’ NB. The B.’'galeatus, of which we only have the ‘head, Enl. 933, and which wes aillant erroneously considers as an aquatic bird, is a true Hornbill, but whose “porton oi on the beak is invested with an excessively thick horn, the anterior ure on of it particularly. | See the general article onthe Hernbills, by Temminck, in the text of the Planches EiColiviées. P.S. It is to General Hardwick that we are at length indebted for a | knowledge of the B. galeatus, which proyes to be, in fact, a true Hor nbill, with a E long cuneiform tail; black; white belly; the tail yellowish, with a black band near the end. Lin. Tr. XIV, pl. xxviii. a 328 Te ‘AVES. “alway s has a metallic lustre. They are solitary birds, that live in wet forests, feed on insects, and build on low branches. The American species have a longer and perfectly eae beak.(1) a ‘. There are some species in the Archipelago of India, wile shorter, stouter and slightly arcuated beak approximates them to the Bee- eaters. Their anterior toes are more separate. They constitute the Jacamerors of Vaillant,(2) who even gives a figure of one that has no ridge above.(3) Finally, there are others—the Jacamar-Alcyon, which have only.three toes. They inhabit Brazil.(4) : i A Picus, Lin.(5) The Woodpeckers are well characterized by their long, straight, angular beak, the end of which is compressed into a wedge, and fitted for splitting the bark of trees; by their slender tongue, armed near the tip with Spice that curve backwards, which by the action of the elastic horns of the hyoid bone, can be thrust far out of the beak, and by their tail, composed of. ten quills(6) with ‘stiff and elastic stems, which acts/as a prop in supporting them while they are climbing.. They are Climbers par excellence: they wand over trees in every direction, striking the bark with their beaks, and in- sinuating their long tongue into its cra s and crevices to obtain” the larvz of insects, on which they feed.» This tongue, besides its armour, is constantly covered with a viscid ‘fluid, secreted by fra 4 Salivary glands: it is drawn back into the beak by,two muscles,” which are wound round the trachea like ribands; in this state of re- traction, the horns of the hyoid ascend under the skin and 1 Eng ie] head, as far as the superior base of the beak, and the’sheath of the tongue is doubled into folds in the bottom of the thagatngg yer aT ny (1) Alcedo paradisexa (Galbula ae Lath. ), Enl. O71; ;—Alcedo galbisla, LM (Galb. viridis, Lath.) Enl. 238;—Galb. ruficauda, Nob. Vail. Ois. de Par. &e.. te pl. 1; or G. macroura, Vieill. Gal. 29;+Galb. albirostris, Lath. Vaill. pl. li; vie Ois. Dor. I, pl. iv;—Galb. albiventris, Vaill. xlvi. (2) Aledo grandis, Gm.; Galbula grandis, Lath. Vaill. pl. liv. (3) The Grand Jacamar, Vaill. I, cit. pl. liii. Se Jacamaciri is the Brazilian name of these birds, according to Maregrave. Gal. " bula, among the Latins, appears to have indicated the Oriole, it was Mehring who " transferred it to the Jacamars. (4) Vaill, Jac. Sup. f. 1, and Spix, 57, 2, by the name of Aleyon sridnetylad® (5) Picus, the Latin name for these birds, giyen to them, it is said, by aking of Latium. (6) Strictly speaking, there are twelve; but the lateral ones, which are very | “ small, are not counted. SCANSORLE. ; 329 stomach is nearly membranous, and they have no cca, still | they also eat fruit. Fearful and wary, they pass most of their time in a soli- tary manner, but during the nuptial season they may frequently be heard summoning their females by loud and rapid tapping on a dry branch. They build once a year in holes of trees, and each sex alter- nately broods upon the eggs until they are hatched. There are six or seven species in Europe. P. martius, L.; Grand Pic noir; Enl. 596; Naum. 131. (The Great Black Woodpecker.) Almost as large as a Crow, and entirely black; a beautiful red forms a calotte in the male, but a mere spot on the occiput in the female. It prefers the pine . forests of the North. P. viridis; Pic vert; Enl. 371; Naum. 132. (The Green Woodpecker’) Size of a turtle-dove; green above; whitish be- neath; the calotte red; rump, yellow; one of the most beautiful birds of Europe. The young are marked with black spots be- neath, and with white ones onthe mantle. It prefers inhabiting the woodland plains, and is partial to the beech and elm. It also seeks food on the ground. ; P. canus, Gm.; Edw. 65; Naum. 133. » where sprinkled with small, white, round spots. Its noisy and * — quarrelsome ‘disposition render it a very unwelcome guest in poultry-yards, although its flesh is excellent. Ina wild state they live in large flocks, and prefer the vicinity of marshes. There are also two species, N. cristata and N. mitrata, Pall., Spic., IV, pl. ii and iii, fig. 1; Vieill. Galer., pl., ccix, in the first of which the head is ornamented with a plumed crest, and in the second with a conical helmet. A third has lately been discovered in which the helmet is very small, and which has a small tuft on the base of the beak, composed of short stems, almost without barbs. J. ptylorhyn- cha, Licht. The great genus, : ; Puasranus, Lin. . Or that of the Piitastats; is Characterized by the cheeks being partly destitute of feathers, and covered with a red skin, and by the tectiform tail, in which the feathers are variousl y'disposed. We first distinguish, GALLUs, "2 e The Cock, in which the head is surmounted with a vertical and fleshy crest, and each side of the lower mandible furnis ed with fleshy wattles. The quills of the tail, fourteen in number, are ele- vated on two vertical planes, placed back to back; the covertsof that of the male are extended into an arch over the tail proper.. The spe- cies so common in our barn-yards, Phas. gallus, L.; Enl. 1 and 49 (The Common Cock and Hen), varies infinitely as to colour, and even greatly as to size; in some races the crest is replaced by a tuft of feathers, or a top-knot; in others the tarsi, and even the toes, are feathered; in one race the crest, wattles, and periosteum of the whole skele- ton are black, and in others, by a kind of monstrosity, we find five, and even six toes, for several generations. Several species of wild Cocks are known. The first, Gallus Sonneratii, Tem. Col., 232 and 233 (The Jungle Cock), was described by Sonnerat, Voy. II, Atl., 117, 118, and is very remarkable for the feathers on the neck of the male, the stems of which widen at the bottom into three successive disks of a horny nature. The crest is denticulate. It is found in the gauts of Hindostan. . Two others have been brought from Java by M. Lechenaud, one of which, Gall. Bankiva, Tem., hasa denticulated crest like the preceding; all the feathers of the neck being long, pendent, and of the most beautiful golden red; it appears to me to bear GALLINACE. S54 the greatest resemblance to our Domestic Cotk. The aeitey Phas. varius, Shaw, Nat., Misc., 353; Ajamalds; Gall. furcatus, Tem. Col. 374, is black, with a cupreous-green neck, speckled with black; the crest entire, and a small kind of dewlap, with-. out lateral wattles. PHEASANTS, properly so called, Have a long cuneiform tail, each of its quills being inclined on two planes, and covering each other. The most common, P. coichicus, L.3 Enl., 121, and 122 (The Common Pheasant of Europe), was ae into Europe by the Argonauts, as it is said, from the banks of the Phasis. «It is now spread through- out all temperate Europe, where it requires, however, a great deal of care. The head and neck of the male are of a deep green, with two small tufts on the occiput; the rest of the plu- mage is of a golden fawn colour, speckled with green. The fe- male is brownish, speckled and variegated with a darker brown. China has lately furnished us with three other species, which, with the Peacock, form the ornaments of our aviaries, viz. Ph. torquatus, which scarcely differs from the common one, except in having a brilliant white spot on each side of the neck. Ph. nycthemerus, L.* (The Silver Pheasant.) White, with ' very fine blackish lines on each Apatiien) ae the belly entirely © black. ay Ph. pictus, L. Enl. 217. (The Golden Pitas So remark- able for its magnificent plumage; the belly i is of a bright red; a beautiful crest of a golden colour hangs from the head; the neck is clothed with a collerette of orange, speckled with black; the ‘upper part of the back is green, the lower part of the rump yellow; the wings red, with a beautiful blue spot; the tail very long, brown, spotted with grey, &c. It appears to me that Pliny’s description of the Phenix, lib. x, cap. 2, was taken from this beautiful bird. The females of all these species have shorter tails than the males, and the plumage variously marked with different shades of grey or brown.(1) One of the most singular of all birds i is, Ph. Argus, L.; L’Argus, Vieill., Galer., pl. cciii. (The Argus.) A Ree Pheasant from the south of Asia, whose head and neck are nearly naked. The tarsi are without spurs; a very long tail to the male; the secondary quills of the wings exces- sively elongated, widened, and covered throughout with ocel- Se ee EEE TERE EC a a) (1) Add the Fuisan versicolor,—Phas. Diardi, Tem., discovered by Messrs Di- ard and Duvaucel, Vieill. Gal. pl. ccv. - _. « AVES: lated spots, , which, when spread, give to the bird a most extra- ordinary aspect. It inhabits the mountains of Sumatra, and of some other countries of the south east of Asia. It forms the genus Arcus, Tem., Gallin. ~ There is reason to believe that a bird exists in the interior of China, the feathers of whose tail are still more elongated, at- taining a length of four feet, whitish, changing togred on the edges, with numerous tranverse black or maronne lines. It is thought to be figured onSome of the Chinese paper hangings. M. Temminck calls it Phasianus superbuss Gall. II, p. 336. The r HovrrirEREsy Fem. ‘ With the flaked cheeks common to this genus, have the*vertical tail and arched coverts peculiar to the Cock, and feathers on their head which they can erect, forming an aigrette similar to that of the Peacock. The inferior edge of the naked skin on the cheeks, which is salient, supplies the place of wattles. The tarsi are armed with strong spurs. Only one species is known; it is from the straits of Sunes’ is the size of a Cock, of a brilliant black, with a golden red rump; the two superior tail-coverts yellowish or whitish, the flanks spotted with white or fawn-colour; Phas. ignitus, Sh. Nat.’ Misc., 3215 Vieill., Galer., pl. ccvii. The female is brown, finely striped with black above, and dashed with white beneath. She has also a crést, ¢ Tracopan, Cuv. - ® The head of the male most fantastically ornamented; it is almost’ naked, and behind each eye is a small slender horn; a wattle under thethroat susceptible of inflation; the tarsi of both sexes armed with short spurs. ° Only one species is known, a native of the north of India, the Nepaul or Faisan cornu, Buff.; Penelope satyra, Gm.; Meleagris satyrus, Lath. Edw. 116; Vieill., Galer. 206. As large as a Cock; of a brilliant red, sprinkled with small white tears. The female and the young are of different shades of brown.(1) We should separate from the Pheasants the 3 Crypronyx, Tem.(2) In which the nakedness of the head is confined to the circum- (1) The Tragopan of Pliny, lib. x, c. 49, was probably imagined from this bird. (2) Vieillot has changed this name into Lrronyx. ' There is a species of Cryptonyx at Malacca, mentioned by Dussumier, which is black, crestless, and without the papillated space about the eye. . GALLINACEA.: _ 353 ference of the eye; the tail is moderate and’plane, and the tarsi with- out spurs; the principal character, however, consists in the absence of the thumb nail. There is only one species well known, the male of which has a long tuft of slender red feathers, and long upright filaments, without barbs on each eye- -brow. It is the Rouloul de Malacca, Sonner. Voy. II, pl. 100; Cr ipt. coronatus, Tem., Col. 350 and 3513; Columba cristata, Gm. and Lath.; Phastanus cristatus, Sparm., Mus. Carls. III, 64. Green; Some wit larger than a Quail. The female, which merely has a vestige of a tuft, is the Tetrao viridis, Lath., Syn. II, pl. 67.(1) ; TeTRAO, Lin.’ This also is a great genus, characterized by a naked and most gene+ rally red band, which occupies the place of the eye-brow.. It is di- vided into subgenera as follows. ' Terrao, Lath. *” The feet of Grous are covered with feathers, and are without spurs. Those to which this name is more particularly applied have a round or forked tail and naked toes. There are two large ee of them “sin France. T. urogallus, L.; Grand Cog de Bruyéres; Enl., 73 and 74. il (The Great Heath- Geick. ) The largest of all the ‘Gilisthces, and superior in size to the Turkey. Its plumage’ is slate- coloured, transversely and finely striped with black; the female is fawn-coloured, the cross lines brown or blackish. Found in the heart of mountain forests, builds among the heath-grass, or \ in newly cleared grounds, and feeds on berries and buds. Its | trachea makes two curves before it dips into the lungs. The . flesh is delicious. T. tetrixz, L.3 Cog de Bouleau; Enl. 172 and 173; Frisch, 109; Naum. Ist Ed., 18, f. 37 and 38. (The Black Cock.) The male is more or less black, with some white on the coverts of the wings and under the tail, the two forks of which diverge laterally. The female is fawn-coloured, transversely striped with blackish and whitish. Their size is that of the Cock, and they are found in mountain forests. (1) The* Columba cristata, B., Gm., Lath., Syn. I, pl. lviii, appears closely allied to it; but the figure represents it as having a large nail to the thumb. This is perhaps an error, as in the Galer. Vieill, tom. I, ‘pl. cex. Vou. L—2 U 354 AVES. An intermediate species appears {to exist in the north of Europe,—7. intermedius, Langsdorf, Mém. de Petersb., tom. III, pl. xiv; Sparm. M. Carls., pl. xy, which is larger than the preceding, with the tail less forked, and the, breast spotted with white. Found inthe marshy districts of Coase Ingria, &c.(1) In the?woods offtemperate Europe we find, T. bonasia, L.; La Gelinotte; Poule des Coudriers;(2) Enl. 474 and 4753 Frisch. 112; Naum., 20, f. 39. (The Hazel Grous,) Which is buta little larger than the Partridge, and is prettily variegated with brown and white, grey and red; alarge black band near the tip of the tail; throat of the male black, and his head slightly tufted.(3) a America produces some neighbouring speciés, such as Tet. canadensis and canace, I..; Gelinotte noire d’ Amer., Enl. 131 and 13%; Edw. 118 and 71, Brown, verging more or less on a black; tip of thevtail red. In some, the feathers on each side of the neck Ts e males’ are turned up like a mantlet, or two scrolls: their habits have an" affinity with those of the Turkey. Such are, . . Tetr. umbellus and togatus, Gm.; Cog. de Bruy. a Gian Enl. 104; Edw. 248; Wils. pl. xlix; called Partridge in Ne England, « ‘ and Pheasant in Pennsylvania. Variegated with ngttwien and, black; a large black spot at the bottom of the neck, on each ~ side; a black band edged with white on the tip of the tail; lower part of the tarsi naked. Found in the mountain forests; the voice of the male in the nuptial season resembles the roll of a drum. Tetr. cupido, Gm., Catesb. Suppl. 1; Wils, pl. xxvii; Vieill. Galer. 219.£(The Pinnated Grous.) Variegated ‘with brown and fawn colour; tail brown; tarsi feathered down to the toes; the feathers on the bottom of the male’s neck turn up into two | pointed scrolls, beneath which is a naked skin, which, in the (1) It appears to be at once the T¥tras é phiinoge variable, and the — a queue pleine, of Buffon. (2) Bonasi4, or Bonasa, name of the Gelinotte i in Albertus Magnus and other authors of the middle ages. (3) The Attagas of Buff., Attagen of Aldrov., Ornith., II, p. 75; Gelinotte huppée,, Briss., appears to me after much research, even in Italy, to be nothing more than a young or female Gelinotte. 1t is the same individual painted by Frisch, pl. exii.. The Tetrao canus, Gm. (Sparm. Mus. Carls., p..16) is only an albino variety of the Gelinotte. Neither have I any confidence in the authenticity of the’ Tetr. : nemessianus, nor in that of the T'etr. betulinus of Scopoli. They are females, or. the young of the Tetr. tetrix, or disfigured cape & “, ° GALLINACE®, | 355 genial season, he inflates like a bladder; his voice sounds like a trumpet. Found on extensive plains, and is such delicious food that laws have been passed to preserve the breed.(1) The name of mae LaGgorus, Or Ptarmigan, is more particularly applied to those species which have a round or square tail; whose toes are feathered as well as the legs. ‘The most common become white in winter. Tetr. lagopus, L.; Lagopéde ordinaire,(2) Enl. 120 and 4945 Brit. Zool. pl. M, 3, M, 4; Naum. Ist Ed. Supp. 61, f. 115, 116. (The Ptarmigan or White Grous. ) Its summer plumage is fawn coloured, marked with small black lines.(3) From high mountains, where it remains during the winter, in holes which it forms under the snow. . Tetr. albus, Gm., called of Hudson’s Bay; 7". saliceti, Tem., Edw. 723 Frisch, 110, 111. (I'he White Ptarmigan.) From the whole north; is larger, and its summer plumage more red; its belly remains white.(4) There is a Ptarmigan in Scotland, however, which does not change its plumage in winter; it is, : Tetr. scoticus, Lath.; Poule de marais; Grous,'&c. Albin. 1, 23, 24;9Brit. Zool. pl. M, 3; Vieill. Galer. 221. (The Red Ptar- vy migan.) Above, variegated with fawn colour, brown and black; ' a deep red, striped with blackish beneath; legs cinereous, and but few feathers on the toes. , ' We may separate by the name of | 5 Ganea or Arracrn.(5)—Prerocres, Tem. Those species which have a pointed tail and naked toes. The cir. cumference of their eyes only is naked, but it is not of a red colour; their thumb is very small. , Tetr. alchata, L.; Ganga, Enl. 105 and 106; Edw. 249.(6) The size of a Partridge; the plumage scalloped with fawn co- $ , Cciigth SAMO eee ee Dik SS ee eee (1) Add Tet. uwrophasianus, Bonap. II, pl. xxi, f. 2;—-Tet. obscurus, Bonap. II, pl. xviii. Am. Ed. (2) Lacorus—hare’s foot, hairy foot—is the ancient name of this bird. (3) In this summer livery it is the Tetr. rupestris, Lath. (4) The summer plumage forms the Zetr. Japponicus, Lath. (5) Attagen, the Greek name of a heavy bird, somewhat larger than the Par- tridge, with the plumage of a Woodcock, probably designated the Ganga. ’ (6), Ganga is its Catalonian name; .2lchata, or rather Chata, its name among the Arabs. " * - 356. r : “Aves... ; lour and brown; the two middle quills oft the tail much elongated and terminating inva point; throat of the male, black. Found in the south of France; and all round the Mediterranean,(1) ¥ : Preropix, Briss. Partridges have the tarsi naked like the toes. Among them the % , FRanco.inus, Tem. Is distinguished by a longer and*stronger beak; a larger tail Vand? generally speaking, by stout spurs. The south of Europe produces one, w. p> * "ti Tetrao francolinus, L.(2) Enl. 147, 148; Edw. 246. With red feet; neck and belly of the male, black, with round white spots; _ a bright red collar.(3) Some of these birds foreign to Europe are remarkable for a double spur,(4) or for the naked skin of their throat.(5) In others these characters are united,(6) and in certain | large beak- ed species the spurs are altogether wanting.(7) The Common PARTRIDGES ; a 4 f Have a somewhat weaker beak; the spurs of the males are either short, or mere simple tubercles; they are deficient in the female. — a , : ’ ‘ » 28 (1) Add of those species which have filaments to the tail, Tetr. senegalus, or Pterocles guttatus, Tem., Enl. 130, and the female 345; —Pterocles exustus, Tem. © Col., 354 and 360:—Of — whose tail. is simply pointed, Tetr. drenarius, ‘Pall. m5 Noy. Com. Petrop., XIX, pl. viii, or Pterocles arenarius, Col. 52 and 53, the same as the Perdix arragonica, Lath.;—Pterocles Lichtensteinii,. T. Col. 355.and 361. The male 355 is at all events closely allied to the Tetr. indicus, Lath.; Sonner. II, 96;—Pterocles coronatus, Tem. Col. 339 and 540; —Pteroeles quadricinctus, Tem. or Oenas bicinctus, Vieill. Galer. 220 ;—finally the largest species, the Tir. fasianel- lus, Gm. or Long-tailed Gelinotte of Hudson’s Bay, Edw. 117, ~ (2) Francolino, the name of the blind made for the purpose of killing the bird whose appellation it bears, is applied in Italy to several aie such as the Geli- notte and this one. , ' (3) Add the Tetrao ponticerianus, Sonner. Voy. 1, 11, 165, Tem. Col. 213;— perlatus, Briss., pl. xxviii, A, fig. 1; Vieill. Galer. 213; the same as the naar riensis, Sonn. II, 166, pl. xcvii. (4) Tetrao bicalcaratus, L., Enl. 137; ee Clappertoni, Rupp., pl. ix, can hardly be said to differ from it; ;—spadiceus, Sonn. Il, 169;—zezlonensis, Ind. Zool. pl. xiv.—The Perdix cruenta, Tem. Col. 322, has three and even four spurs, and bright colours foreign to the rest of the genus. ‘ (5) Tetrao rubicollis, Enl..180. (6) Tetrao nudicollis. * (7) Tetrao javanicus, Brown, Il., xvii, (a bad figure); there is a better one, Col. 148, under the name of Pedriz ajanham, Vemm. : 'g a ba) v GALLINACE. | oie Letrao cinereus, L.5 Enl. 27; Feely 114; Naum. Ist Ed. pl. 3, ft 3. (he Grey Partridge.) Beak and feet ash coloured; head fawn coloured; the plumage of various shades of grey; a maronne ° spot on the bréast of the male. This common bird, which con- stitutes so important an item in the luxuries of the tables of Eu- ropeans, lives and builds in their fields. Tetr. rufus, L.; Enl. 150. (The Red Partridge.) Beak and feet red; brown ators flanks speckled with red and cinereous; throat white, surrounded with black; prefers the hills and rising grounds. The flesh is white Si dry. The south of France produces \ : Perdiz greca, Briss.; Per. saxatilis, Meyer; La Bartavelle, En]. 231; Frisch. 116. Which only differs from the Red Par- tridge in its superior size and more ash coloured plumage. It” is found along the Brest mountain ranges.(1) . « ae 1X. Quails are smaller than Partridges, with a slenderer beak and shorter tail; no red eye-brow nor spurs. Every one knows ms Tetr ao coturniz, L.; Enl. 1703 Frisch, 117; Naum. 4, f. 4. (The Common Oeil.) Back brown, waved with black; a point- » ed white stripe on each feather; throat brown, eyebrows whitish; _ Found in the fields of Europe, and celebrated for its migrations; } during which this heavy bird finds means to cross the Mediter- “ranean. (2) The » Pe “PARTRIDGES AND QUAILS of AMERICA eo | 8 Have a eater; shorter, and more convex beak; the tail i is some- what larger.(3) “They perch on bushes, and, when disturbed, even _on trees. .Several of them migrate like the Quails of Europe. SDAA RO pba DT ei babe et i (1) Add the Red Partridge of Barbary, a very distinct species, ( Tetr. petrosus, Gm.) Edw., 70;—the Perdriz de montaigne, (Tetrao montanus), Enl. 136, Frisch. 114, B, is only, according to Bonnelli,.a variety of the Grey Partridge;—the Per drix de haye, Tem. Col. 328 and 329; ;—-Perd. personata, Horsf. Jav. ;—Perd. a2 gorge rousse (Perd. gularis, T.);—Perd. oculea, Id. ;—Perd. fusca, Vieill. Gal. 212. (2) Add the petite Caille de la Chine (Tetr. chinensis, L.), Enl. 126, F, 2, of which the Ttér. manillensis, Gm., Sonner. Voy. I, pl. xxiv, is the female;—the Caille australe (Perd., australis, T.), Vieill., Galer. 215;—the Cuille nattée (Perd. textilis, Temm. ), Col. $5;—the Tetr. coromandelicus, Sonner-. I, 172;—T. striatus, Sonner., I, pl. xcxviii, and Temm. Col. 82, very different from that of Lath. Syn. Il, pl. lxvi;s—the Pedrix de gingi ( Tetr. gingieus), Sonner. II, p- 167, also appears to belong to this subgenus. ~ (3) Among the species, the size of the Partridge, we may remark the Tocro, or Perdrix de la Guiane, Buff. (Tetr. guyanensis, Gm.) or Perd. dentata, Tem. or a c" ‘age It is impossible to ayoid depuis z from the whole genus Tetrao the F ~ ™ x - 4 = -« : Po 4 Tripactryztes, Lacép. Borroprosp Tem. ’ In which the thumb is wanting, and,whose compressed be beak for forms a little projection under the der mandible. They cannot, how. ever, be properly classed until their anatomy is better known. They are Bolyesmane and inhabit sandy eer ice: ae Some of them, the Turnrx, Bonn at.—OnryGIs, Mig. Have still all the appearance of Quam t their toes are completely separated down to the very base, ant, are without the small mem- branes. . The natives of Java use one species for fighting, as Cocks are used _ in England; it is the Hemip. pugnax, T. » Col. 602.(1) "Others, such as the ae _ 9 . °¢ aoe . : , SyrruarreEs, Illig., pal Are so far removed from the general type of the Gallinacezx, - we are tempted to doubt the propriety of placing them in this order. Their short tarsi are covered with feathers as well as the toes, which are also very short and partly united; their wings are extremely long and pointed. os ; One species ‘only is known, and that is from the deserts of © central Asia—Tetrao paradoxus, Pall., Voy., Fr. Trans. 8yo, tom. III, pl. 1, page 18; Vieill. Galer., pl. te. the Hetero- _clite, Tem., Col., . 95. ¢® Odontophorus rufus, Vieill. Galer. pl. ccxi, which is not a Tina as Gmelin », asserts. Among those the size of the Quail : Tetrao mexicunus, Enl..149, Frisch. 1. § the same as marylandicus, Albin. I, xxviii, and as virginianus, or Perdix borealis, Vieill. Galer. 214;—Tttr. Falklandicus, Enl., 222;— Tetr. cristatus, Enl: 126, f. 1;— the Colin Sonnini (Perd. Sonnini, T,) Col. 75, and Jour. de Phys., Ul, 217, and pl. 2;—the Colin @ aigrette de Californie, Tetr. californius, Sh., Nat. Misc. IX, pl. 345, and Atl. Voy. de la Peyrouse, pl. xxxvi;—the Perd. rousse-gorge (Pend. cambayen- sis, Tem.) Col, 447;—Perd. australis, Vieill. Gal. 215. : (1) Add Tetrao nigricollis, Enl. 171;—Tetr. andalusicus, Lath., Syn. Tr , part 2, fig. of the title page;—T%tr. lwzoniensis, Sonn. Voy. I, pl. xxiii; —Hemipodius ni- grifrons, Tem. II, 610, and Vieill. Gal. 218;—Hemip. thoracicus, Tem. III, 622, or L'urnix maculatus, Vieill. Gal. pl. 217;—Hemip. Meiffrenii, T. Col. 60, 1, of which Vieill., Gal. 300, makes his genus Torticetxe, and places it among the Waders, inasmuch as the lower part of the tibia is without feathers;—the Hemip. nivosus, Swains. Zool. lll., 163, must also belong to it;—the Tir. suscitator, or Htéveil-matin of Java is also a Turhix. See Hontius, Med. Ind. P- 65. GALLINACEA, 359 It is equally necessary to separate from Tetrao, the . Trvamus, Lath.—Cryrrurvs, Illig.—Ynampus, Azz.(1) Or the Tinamous, a genus of American birds very remarkable for a ° slender and long neck, (although their tarsi are short) covered with feathers, the tips of whose barbs are slender and slightly curled, which gives a very peculiar air to that part of their plumage. The beak is long, slender, and blunt at the end; somewhat arched, with a little groove on each side; the nostrils are pierced in the middle of © each side, and penetrate obliquely backwards. Their wings are short, and they have scarcely any tail. ‘The membrane between the base of the toes is very short. Their thumb, reduced to a spur, cannot reach the ground... The circumference of the eye is partly naked. They either perch on low branches of trees, or hide among “tall grass; they feed on fruits and insects, and their flesh is good. ‘Their size varies from that of the Pheasant down to that of the Quail, some of them are even still smaller. One portion of them,—Przus, Spix, is still furnished with a small tail concealed under the feathers of the rump.(2) In. the other—Tinamus, Spix, every vestige of a tail is annihi- » lated.(3) Their nostrils are placed a little farther back. *. We should distinguish the Ryncnorus, Spix, whose beak, which is stronger, has no groove, and is slightly arcuated and depressed; the nostrils are pierced near the base.(4) : ee : .. Conumsa, Lin. : The Pigeons may be considered as forming a slight transition from the Gallinacez to the Passerine. Like the former, their beak is vaulted, the nostrils perforated in a broad membranous space, and (1) Except his Choro, which is a Gallinula, and his Uru, which is the Tocro al- ready spoken of among the Partridges. | (2) Tetr. major, Gm., or Tin. brasiliensis, Lath., or the Tin. magoua, Tem. ; Buff. Enl. 476, and much better, Hist. des Ois., IV, 4to, pl. xxiv; it is the Pezus serratus, Spix;—Tetr. cinereus;—Tetr. variegatus, Enl. 328, from which the Tin. undulatus, T., or Cryptura sylvicola, Vicill. Gal. 216, can differ but little; —Tin. '- apequia ( T’. obsoletus, Tem.) Col. 196;—T'in. tataupa, Swains. ill. 19, or T. plum- beus, 'F. Col. 196, or Pezus niamba, Spix, 78, a;—T'inamus noctivagus, Pr. Max., or Pezus zabele, Sp., 77;—Tin. macaco or vermiculé (T'. adspersus, T.), Col. 369, or _ Pezus \vapura, Sp. 78:—Tetr. sovi, Gm., or Tin. sovi, Lath. Buff., Enl. 829. (3) Tin. inambut, Azz. (Tt maculosus,1.), or T: mejor, Sp., 80;—T. medius, Spix,81;—T.- boraquira, Sp. 79;—T- carape, (ZT. pavoninus, T.) of which the Tinam. minor, Sp- 81, appears to be the female. These three species are very similar. (4) The Tinamou isabelle (T. rufescens, T.), Col. 412; or Rhinchotus fasciatus, Spix, 76. | : 360 AVES. covered with a cartilaginous scale, which even forms a bulge at the base of the bill; the bony sternum is deeply and doubly emarginated, although somewhat differently; the crop extremely dilated, and the lower larynx furnished with butia single proper muscle; but there is no other membrane between the base of their toes than that which results from the continuity of the edges. Their tail is composed of twelve quills. They fly” well, live in a state of monogamy, build on trees or in fissures among rocks, and lay but few eggs at a time, generally two; it is true they lay frequently. The male assists his, mate in the business of brooding. They nourish their young by disgorging macerated grain into their crop. They form but one genus, which naturalists have attempted to’ divide into three sub- genera, from the greater or less strength of the bill and the propor- tions of the feet. The f ° ‘i “% ; “ Cotumsi-GALLINEs, Vail. Approximate to the ordinary Gallinacez still more than the other subgenera, by their more elevated tarsi and their habit of living in flocks, seeking their food on the ground, and never perching. Their beak is thin and flexible. ' ’ One species is even allied to the Gallinacee by the caruncles and naked portions of skin that distinguish its head; it is the . | Columba carunculata, Tem. pl. 11; Columbi-galline, Vaill. 278. A second is at all events connected with them by its size, which about equals that of the Turkey; it is the Crowned Pigeon of the Archipelago of India; Goura,Tem.; Colombihocco, Vaill.; Col. coronata, Gm.; Sonn. 104; Enl. 118; Tem., Pigeons, pl. 1; Vieill., Galer. 197. Altogether of a slate-blue, with some chesnut and white on the wing; the head ornamented with a vertical tuft of long slender feathers. It is bred in the poultry yards at Java, &c., but does not propagate in,Europe.(1) A third claims an alliance with them, from the long pendent feathers which ornament its neck, like that of the Cock. It is the Pigeon de Nincombar; Col. nincombarica, L.3; Enl. 491, and is of the most brilliant golden-green, with a white tail. Found in several parts of India.(2) The ~ CoLumB2, Or Common Pigeons, have shorter feet than the preceding birds, (1) This large Crowned Pigeon constitutes the genus goura, or Loruraus of Vieill. Galer. pl. 197. ie.” (2) Species placed in this genus which are not, perhaps, sufficiently deter- GALLINACE. 361 but the same thin and flexible beak. Four wild species are found in Europe. Col. palumbus, L.; Le Ramier, Enl. 316. (The Cushat.) Is the largest, and inhabits the forests, preferring those of Pines, &c. It is ash-coloured, more or less blue; breast of a vinous red, and is distinguished by white spots on the sides of the neck and on the wing. Col. enas, L.; Le Colombin; Frisch, 139. (The Stock Dove.) A slate-grey, the breast vinous; sides of the neck a changeable green; somewhat smaller than the preceding, but has similar habits. : Col. livia, Briss.; Biset or Pigeon de roche; Enl. 510. (The Rock Dove). Slate-greys circumference of the neck a changea- ble green; a double black bandon the wing; rump, white. This species is the parent stock of our Common Pigeon, and most probably of all our innumerable domestic races, in whose pro- duction the mixture of some neighbouring species may also have had some influence. Col. turtur, L.; Tourterelle; Enl. 394. (The Turtle Dove.) A fawn coloured mantle spotted with brown; neck bluish, with a spot on each side speckled with white and black. The smallest of the wild, European species. It inhabits the woods. Col. risoria, L.3; Rieuse; Enl. 244; Frisch, 44; Tem. 44. (The Ring Dove.) Appears to be originally from Africa. It is of a flaxen colour, paler beneath; a black collar round the neck.(1) mined: Columba cyanocephala, Enl. 174, Vaill., 281; Tem. 3;—Col. montana, Edw. 119; Tem. 4;—Col. martinica, Enl. 141, 162; Vaill. 282; Tem. 5 and 6;— Col. erythrothorax, Tem. 7;—Col. cruenta, Sonn. 20, 21; Tem. 8 and 9;—Col. ja- maicensis, Tem. 10;—Col. talpacoti, Tem. 12;—Col. passerina, Enl. 243, 2, Ca- tesby, 26;—Col. minuta, Enl. 243, 1;—Col. hottentotta, Tem., Vaill. 283 ;—Col. cobocola, and. Col. griseola, Spix, LXXV, 2. N.B. The C. passerina and squamosa form the genus Caammreria of Swain- son; the C. cinerea, T., the genus Prrisrera, and the C. migratoria, the genus EororistTEs. _ (1) Other Columbe with a square or round tail, Col. spadicea, Tem. 1;—Col. aned, Enl. 164, Tem. 3 and 4; Voy de Freycin., 29, of which, according to Tem- minck, Col. pacifica is the male;—the Col. océanique, Less. and Garn. Voy. de Du- perre, isa neighbouring species;—Col. arcuatriz, Vaill. Afr.; Tem. 5;—C. armillaris, Tem. 6;—C. littoralis, Sonn: 103; Tem. 17;—C. chalcoptera, ‘Tem. 8;—C. cristata, Tem. 9;—C. caribexa, Tem. 10;—C. lewcocephala, Catesb. 65; ‘Tem. 13;—C. speciosa, Enl. 213; Tem. 14;—C. corensis, Tem. 15;—C. guinea, Edw. 75; Vaill. Afr. 265; Tem. 16;—C. madagascariensis, Enl. 11; Vaill. Afr. 266; Tem. 17;—C. gymnoph- talmos, Tem. 18;—C. Franciz, Sonner. 101; Tem. 19;—€. rubri-capilla, Sonner. 57; Tem. 20;—C. elegans, Tem. 22;—C. cincta, Tem. 23;—C. rufina, Tem. 24;— C. leucoptera, Edw. 76; Tem. 25;—C. javanica, Enl.177; Tem. 26; Sonner. 66;— Vou. I.—2 V 362 AVES. The species of this division are numerous, and may be still more subdivided, according to the greater or less nudity of their tarsi, and from the naked space found round the eyes of some of them.(1) Some have even caruncles, and other naked parts on the head. Such is the Col. auricou; Col. auricularis, Tem., 21. We can also separate some species with pointed tails.(2) But the best of all the divisions that have been made among the Pigeons, is that of, Vinaco, Cuv.—Corumpars, Vaill.(3) Known by the bill, which is thicker, formed of a solid substance, and compressed on the sides; the tarsi are short, the feet wide and well bordered. They all feed on fruit, and inhabit forests. But few species are known, all of which are from the torrid zone of the east- ern continent.(4) Some of them have a pointed tail.(5) C. jamboo, Tem. 27 and 28;—C. violacea, Tem. 29;—C. melanocephala, Enl. 214; Tem. 380;—C. larvata, Vaill. Afr. 269; Tem. 31;—C. holosericea, Tem. 32;—C. sinica, Albin, III, 46;—C. viridis, Enl. 142;-—C. erythkroptera, Temm. 55;—C. mys- tacea, T. 56;—C. superba, T. 33;—C. tympanistria, Vaill. 272, Tem. 36;—C. cxrulea, T. 37;—C. afra, Enl. 160; Vaill. 271; Tem. 38 and 39;—C. Geoffroy, T. 57;—C. cinerea, T. 58, and the female, Col. 260;—C. bitorquata, T. 40;—C. vinacea, T. 41;—C. tigrina, Sonner., 102;—C. cambayensis, Vaill. 270; T. 45;—C. mala- barica, Col. brame, 'T.;—C. alba, Tem. 46;—C. squamosa, T. 59;—C. malaccensis, Mus. Carls. 67; Edw. 16; Tem. 47;—C. macroura, Enl. 329;—C. porphyrea, Tem, Col. 106;—C. dilopha, T. Col. 162;—C. magnifica, T. Col. 163;—C. locutrix, Pr. Max.; Col. 166;—C. leucomela, T. Col. 186;—C., scripta, T. Col. 187;—C. Dussu- mieri, T. Col. 188;—C. leucotis, T. Col. 189;—C. xanthura, Cuv.; Col. 190;—C. picturata, T. Col. 242;—C. sperspicillata, Col. 246;—C. tuctuosa, Reinw.; Col. 247;—C. hyogastra, R.; Col. 252;—C. monacha, R.; Col. 253;—C. humilis, T. Col. 258;—C. pinon, Quoy and Gaym., Voy. Freycin., 28;—C. pampusan, Ib. 30;—C. araucana, Less. and Garn. Voy. de Duperr. 40;—C. cyanovirens, Ib.42;—C. Zox, Tb. 29. ? Add, Col. fasciata, Bonap. I, pl. Ixxvii, f. 3;—Col. zenaida, Bonap. II, pl. xv, £2. Wim. Bd: (1) M. Swains. calls Prirrnorvs those species which have feathered tarsi, such as the C. purpurata, T. Col. 34, &c. (2) Col. migratoria, Enl. 176; Frisch, 142; Tem. 48 and 49;—Col. carolinensis, Ib. 175; Tem. 50; Catesb. 24; Edw. 15;—Col. Reinwartii, Tem. Col. 248;—C. humeralis, Ib. 191;—C. amboinensis, Ib., 100;—C. lophotes, Ib. 142;—C. venusta, Ib. 341, 1, or Col. strepitans, Spix, Ixxv, 1;—Col. dominicensis, Ib. 487; Tem. 51; —Col. capensis, Ib. 140, &c.; Vaill. 273, 274; Tem. 53, 54;—C. Maugei, Tem, 52;—Col. macquaria, Quoy and Gaym., Voy. de Freyc., 31. (3) Vinago, the Latin name of the C. enas—Vieill. has changed it into Trrron. (4) Col. abyssinica, or Wallia of Bruce, Vaill. 276, 277; Tem. 8 and 9;—Col. australis, Enl, 3, Tem. 3;—Col. aromatica, Enl. 163; Tem. 57; Brown, Zool. Ill. 20;—Col. vernans, Enl. 158; Tem. 10 and 11;—Col. militaris, Tem. 1 and 2;—C. psittacea, Tem. 4;—C. calva, Tem. 7;—C€. olax, T. Col. 241;—C. Capellei, tb. 143. (5) Col. oxyura, T. Col. 240. GRALLATORIA. 363 ORDER V. GRALLATORIZA.—Gratuia, Lin. The birds of this order derive their name from their habits, and from the conformation which causes them. They are known by the nudity of the lower part of their legs, and most generally by the height of their tarsi; two circumstances which enable them to enter the water to a certain depth without wetting their feathers; to wade through it and seize fish by means of their neck and bill, the length of which is usually proportioned to that of the legs. Those which are furnished with a strong bill, feed on fish and reptiles ; while such as have a weak one, consume worms and insects. A very few feed par- tially on grain, and they alone live at a distance from rivers, &c. The external toe is most commonly united at its base with that of the middle one, by means of a short membrane ; sometimes there are two similar membranes, and at others they are en- tirely wanting, and the toes are completely separated; it sometimes also happens, though rarely, that they are border- ed all along, or palmated to the very end; in fine, the thumb is deficient in several genera; circumstances, all of which have an influence on their mode of life, which is more or less aquatic. Almost all these birds, the Ostriches and Cassowaries excepted, have long wings, and fly well; during which action they extend their legs backwards, differing in this from all others, which fold them under the belly. In this order we establish five principal families, and some insulated genera. FAMILY I. BREVIPENNES. These birds, although similar in general to the other Gral- latorie, differ from them greatly in one point—the shortness of the wings, which renders flight impossible. The beak 364 AVES. and regimen give them numerous aflinities with the Galli- nacez. It appears as if all the muscular power which is at the com- mand of nature, would be insuflicient to move such immense wings as would be required to support their massive bodies in’ the air. The sternum is a simple buckler, and is deficient in that ridge which is found in all other birds. The pectoral muscles are thin and delicate, but the posterior extremities regain what the wings have lost—the muscles of the thighs, and of the legs in particular, being enormously thick and stout. The thumb is always deficient.(1) They form two genera. SrruTruio, Lin. The Ostriches have wings furnished with loose and flexible feathers, but still sufficiently long to increase their speed inrunning. Every one knows the elegance of these slender-stemmed plumes, the barbs of which, although furnished with little hooks, always remain sepa- rate, contrary to what takes place in most other birds. Their beak is horizontally depressed, of a moderate length, and blunt at the end; their tongue short, and rounded like a crescent; their eye large, and the lid fringed with lashes; their legs and tarsi very long. They have an enormous crop, a large sac between the crop and gizzard, volu- minous intestines, long cca, and a vast reservoir in which the urine accumulates as in a bladder, being the only birds which can be said to urine. The penis is very large, and is frequently exposed.(2) But two species are known, each of which might form a-separate. genus. ' Struthio camelus, L.; Enl. 457.(3) (The Ostrich of the East- ern Continent.) But two toes, the external of which is one half shorter than its fellow, and has no nail. This bird, so highly celebrated from the earliest ages, abounds in the sandy deserts of Arabiaand Africa. It attains the height of six or eight feet, lives in great troops, lays eggs, each weighing nearly three (1) The number of the phalanges is as follows, commencing with the inter- nal toe: Ostrich, 4, 5: Nandou and Cassoway, 3, 4, 5: Which amounts to the numbers common among birds. (2) For the genito-urinary organs of birds, and those of the Ostrich in particu- lar, consult the Mém. of Geoffroy Saint-Hillaire, Mém. du Mus., tom. XV. , (3) See also the beautiful figure drawn by Maréchal, in the Mente: du Mus. of Lacep. and Cuvier, copied Vieill. Galer. pl. 223. ° GRALLATORLE. 365 pounds, which, in very hot climates, it is contented with expos- ing in the sand to the warmth of the sun, but over which, out of the tropics, it broods with great care, defending them cou- rageously every where. The Ostrich feeds on grass, grain, &c., and so obtuse is its sense of taste that it swallows pebbles, pieces of iron, copper, &c. When pursued it dashes stones behind ~ it with great violence. No animal can overtake it in the race. Struth. rhea, .3(1) Nandou, Churi, &c., Hammer. An. Mus. XII, xxxix; Vieill. Galer. 224. (The American Ostrich.) Is about one half smaller, with more thinly furnished feathers, of a uniform grey colour, and particularly distinguished by its three toes, all having nails. Its plumage is greyish, browner on the back: a black line along the back of the neck in the male. It is as common in the southern parts of South America, as the “preceding one is in Africa. When taken young, it is easily tamed. Several females, it is said, lay in the same nest, or » rather the same hole, yellowish eggs, which are hatched by the male. It is only eaten when very young. Casvarius, Briss. The Cassowaries have wings still shorter than those of the Ostrich, and. totally, useless, even in running. There are three toes to all the . feet, each furnished with a nail; the barbs of their feathers are so poorly provided with, barbulz, that at a distance they resemble pen- dent hairs. Two spécies are known, each of which might also con- stitute a genus. | Struthio casuarius, L.; Emeu,(2) Enl. 313, and better Frisch, 105.(3) (The Cassowary.) The beak laterally compressed; head surmounted by a bony prominence, covered with a horny substance; skin of the head and top of the neck naked, of an azure-blue and a fiery red colour, with pendent caruncles like those of the Turkey; some stiff stems in the wings, without barbs, which the bird uses as weapons in combat; nail of the internal toe much the strongest. It is the largest of all birds, next to the Ostrich, and differs considerably from it in its anatomy, for (1) Brisson and Buffon, following Barrére, have improperly applied to it the name of Touyou, or rather of J'owiouiow, which belongs to the Jabiru. It is the genus Rhea of Brisson. The Portuguese of Brazil have transferred to it the name ‘of Emeu, which properly belongs to the Cassowary. (2) Casswwaris, the Malay name of this bird. Eme, or Emeu, its peculiar appel- lation in Banda. (S) There is also an excellent figure of it by Marechal in the Menag. du Mus. copied Vieill. Galer. pl. 225. 366 AVES. its intestines are short, and the czca small; the intermediate stomach between the crop and gizzard is wanting, and its cloaca is not larger in proportion than that of other birds. It feeds on fruit and eggs, but not grain. The female lays a small number of green eggs, which like the Ostrich she abandons to the solar heat. Found in different islands of the Archipelago of India. Cas. Novx-Hollandiz, Lath.; Voy. de Péron, Atl. part 1, pl. xxxvi; Viecill. Galer. pl. 226.(1) (The Cassowary of New Hol- land.) A depressed beak; no helmet on the head; a little naked skin about the ear; plumage brown and more of it; more barbs to the feathers; no caruncles, or spurs on the wing; nails of the toes about equal. Its flesh resembles beef. Its speed is greater than that of the swiftest greyhound. The young ones are striped with brown and black. (2) . FAMILY Il. © 0% PRESSIROSTRES. Pes ; This family comprises genera ‘with long legs). without a thumb, or in which the thumb is too short to reach the - ground. The bill is moderate, but strong enough to penetrate the earth in search of worms; hence we find those species in which it is weakest frequenting meadows and newly ploughed grounds to’ obtain that sort of food with more facility. Such as have stronger beaks, also feed on herbs, grain, &c. (1) This constitutes the genus Emov, or Dromatvs of Vieillot. (2) N.B. I cannot allow room in this work for species so little known, and even so poorly authenticated, as those which form the genus Dipvs of Linnzus. ‘The first, or the Didus ineptus, is only known from a description drawn up by the first Dutch navigators, and given by Clusius, Exot., p. 99, and from an oil painting of the same period, copied by Edwards, pl. 294; for the description of Herbert is puerile, and all others are copied from Clusius and Edwards. It seems that the species has completely disappeared, nothing remaining of it at the present day but a foot preserved in the British Museum (Shaw, Nat. Misc. pl. 143), and a head in very bad condition possessed by the Asmolean Museum of Oxford (Id. Ib. pl. 166.) The beak bears some resemblance to that of the Penguins, and the foot, if it were palmated would be like that of the Aptenodytes. The second species, Didus solitarius, rests on the bare testimony of Leguat, Voy. I, p. 98, a man who has disfigured well known animals, such as the Hippo- potamus and the Lamantin. The third, Didus nazaremus, is only known from the account of Francois AM P e oy é GRALLATORIE, 367 v 4 _ Oris, Lin. The Bustards, in addition to the massive carriage of the Gallina- cez, have a long neck and legs, and moderate beak; its superior mandible being slightly arcuated:and arched, which, as well as the very small membranes between the base of the toes, again recal the idea of the Gallinacez. But the nakedness of the lower part of their legs, their whole anatomy, and even the flavour of their flesh, place them among the Grallatoriz, and as they have no thumb, the smaller species approximate closely to the Plovers. Their tarsi are reticu- lated, and their wings short; they fly but seldom, hardly ever using their wings, except to assist themselves in running. They feed in- differently on grain and herbs, worms and insects. O. tarda, L., Enl. 245. (The Great Bustard.) Back, of a bright fawn colour, crossed with numerous black streaks, the remainder greyish. The feathers of the ears of the male, which is the largest bird in Europe, are lengthened out on both sides, forming a kind of large mustachios. This species, which is considered as being among the best game of that country, frequents its extensive plains, building on the ground among the grain. s O. tetrax, L.; Enl. 25 and 10. (The Little Bustard.) More than a half smaller, and much less common than the tarda; brown above, sprinkled with black; whitish beneath; neck of the male black, with two white collars. The beak of most species foreign to Europe is more slender than that of those which belong to it. Among the former we may remark, O. houbara, Gm.; Le Houbara, Desfontaines, Acad. des Sc., 1787, pl. x3 Vieill: Galer., pl. ccxxvii. (The Houbara.) So called on account of the ruff of elongated feathers which orna- ments both sides of its neck. From Africa and Arabia.(1) Cauche, who considers it to be the same as the ineptus, giving it however but three toes, while all the others allow the former to possess four. No one has been -able to obtain a sight of any of these birds since the time of the above named tra- vellers. Of all birds, that which has its wings the most completely reduced to a simple vestige, is the Apterya, represented by Shaw, Nat. Misc. 1055 and 1057. Its ge- neral figure is that of an Aptenodytes, its size that of a Goose. The feet would be those of the former, were they not described as wanting the web. The beak is very long, slender, marked with a longitudinal groove on each side, and having a membrane at base. The wing is reduced to a little stump, terminated by a hook. From New Holland. (1) I leave among the Bustards all Latham’s species, such as the Afra, Lath. eo f é 368 | AVES. CHARADRIUS, Lin.(1 ) The Plovers have no thumb; the beak is moderate, compressed, and enlarged at the point. They may be divided into two subgenera; viz. CEpIcNEMUS, Tem.(2) In which the end of the beak is inflated above as well as beneath, and the fosse of the nostrils only extend half its length. They are larger species which prefer dry and stony places, and feed on snails, insects, kc. They have some affinity with the smaller species of Bustards. Their feet are reticulated, and there is a short membrane between each of their three toes. (dic. crepitans, Tem.; Charadrius wdicnemus, L.; Courlis de terre; Enl. 919; Frisch, 215; Naum. Ed. J, 9, f. 13. (The Thick- knee.) Size of a Woodcock; afawn coloured grey, with a brown streak on the middle of each feather; white belly; a brown. streak under the eye.(3) Cuaraprius,Cuv. , The beak of the True Plovers is only inflated above, and has two- thirds of its length occupied by the nasal fossz, which render it weaker. They live in large flocks, and frequent low grounds, where they strike the earth with their feet, in order to at in motion the worms on which they feed. The species of France are only found there, i in transituyduring the autumn and in the spring: near the sea coast, some of them remain until the beginning of winter. Their flesh is excellent, and with various other species, they form a tribe with reticulated legs, the most remarkable of which are: Char. pluvialis, L., Ent. 9043; Frisch, 216; Naum. I, c. 10, f. Syn. II, pl. Ixxix;—the benghalensis, Edw. 250;—the Arabs, Id. 12;—but I with- draw the (Edicnemus, which, on account of its compressed beak, enlarged at the end, begins the following genus.—Add, Otis nuba, Rupp. pl. 1;—Ot. denhami;— Ot. torquata, Cuv., a new species from the Cape. (1) Charadrius, the Greek name of a nocturnal aquatic bird, comes from x2ee- dee. Gaza translates it by Miaticula. (2) Edicnemus (swelled leg), a name invented by Belon for the Thick-knee. (3) Add the Gdicnéme tachard (2d; maculosus, Cuy.) Col. 292;—the Gd. 2 longs pieds (Ed. longipes, Geoff.) Vieill. Gal. 228, or Cd: echasse, Tem. Col. 386;—the (Hd. 4 gros bee (2d. magnirostris, Geoff. ), Col. 387, might, from the form of its beak, be placed at the head of a particular series to which would belong a closely allied species with a slightly recurved upper mandible: @d. recurvirostris, Cuv.:—Char. crassirostris, Spix, 94. — 4 GRALLATORI&. 369 143 Wils. VII, lix, 5. (The Golden Plover.) Blackish; the edges of its feathers dotted with yellows; white belly. It is the most common of all, and is found throughout the whole globe. The north produces one which scarcely differs from it except in its black throats it is the Cha». apricarius, Edw. 1403 Naum. I, f. 153) Wils. VII,"lvii, 4. Some authors assert it is the young of the other. Char. morinellus, L.; Le Guignard, Enl. 832; Naum. 12, f. 16, 17. (The Dotterel.) Grey or blackish; feathers edged with fulvous-grey; a white streak over the eye; breast and upper part of the belly of a bright red; lower part of the belly white. Char. hiaticula, 1..; Pluvier a collier, Enl. 920; Frisch, 2145 Brit. Zool. pl. P; Wils. V, xxxvii, 2. (The Ring Plover.) Grey above; white beneath; a black collar round the lower part of the neck, very broad in front; the head variegated with black and white; bill, yellow and black. Three or four species or races are found in France differing in size, and in the distribu- tion of the colours on the head.(1) This same distribution, with but little variation, is found in several species foreign to Eu- rope. (2) Many Plovers have scutellated legs; they form a small division, most of its species having spines to their wings, or fleshy wattles on the head; some of them have both these characters.(3) Vane.uus, Bechst.—Trinea, Lin.(4) The Lapwings have the same kind of beak as the Plovers, and are (1) Ch. minor, Meyer, Enl. 921; Wils. VII, lix, 3; Naum. 15, f. 19, or Ch. cu- » ronicus, Lath., with an entirely black beak;—Ch. cantianus, Lath., or albifrons, Meyer, of which the Ck. xgyptius may possibly be the female. Its collar is inter- rupted. (2) Char. vociferus, Enl. 286; Wils. VII, lix, 6;—Char. tndiaee Lath. ;—Char. Azarai, T., Col. 184;—Char. melanops, Vieill., Gal. 235, or Ch. nigrifrons, Cuy. Col. 47, 1 Olt Wilsonii, Wils. 1X, Ixiii, 5—Add, of closely allied species, although without collars: Ch. peewarius, T. Col. 183;—Ch. nivifrons, Cuy.;—Char. ruficapillus, T. Col. 47, 2;—Ch. monachus, Tem. ;—Ch. griseus, Lath. Add Ch. semipalmatus, Wils. VIL, pl. lix, f. 3;—Ch. melodus, Wils. ‘v; pl. xxvii, f. 3.’ Am. Ed. (3) Siesien with unarmed, scutellated feet: Char. coronatus, Enl. 800 aay, i me- lanocephalus, Enl. 918, Savigny, Egypt., Ois,, pl. vi, f. 4, of which Vieillot makes his genus Piuyzanvs, Gal, pl. xxiii—its beak is somewhat stouter than the others. Armed species: Char. spinosus, Enl. 801;—Ch. cayanus, Enl. 833. Species with wattles: Char. pileatus, Enl. 834;—Ch. bilobus, Enl. 880. The Char. cristatus, Edw. 47, appears to be the same as the pH 9 (4) Tringa, or rather Trynga, the Greek name of a bird the size of a Thrush, which frequents the shores of rivers, and is constantly moving its tail, Arist. It Vou. L.—2 W 370 AVES. only distinguished from them by the presence of a thumb; but it is so small that it cannot reach the ground. 9 In the first tribe, thatof the Lapwinc-PLovers, (SquaTAROLA, Cuv.) it is even scarcely visible. It is distinguished by the bill, which is inflated underneath, and its nasal fossa being short like that of an Gidicnemus. The feet are reticulated: all those of France have the tail striped with white and black, forming, as is asserted, but one species whose great diversity of plumage has occasioned its multi- plication. It is always found with the Plovers. Tringa squatarola; Le Vanneau gris, Enl. 854. (The Grey Lapwing.) Greyish above, whitish with greyish spots beneath, is the young bird -before it has moulted. The Variegated Lap- ' wing, (Tringa varia,) Enl. 923, white, spotted with greyish; blackish mantle dotted with white, comprises the two sexes in their winter plumage. The Vanneau suisse, (Tringa helvetica, Enl. 853, Naum. Ed. I, 62, f. 117,) black and white spots above, black beneath from the throat to the thighs, is the male in his wedding livery. VANELLUsS, Cuv. The true Lapwings have a rather more decidedly marked thumb, the tarsi scutellated, at least partially so, and the nasal fosse extend- ing two-thirds the"length of the beak. They are equally as industrious in the pursuit of worms as the Plovers, procuring them inthe same manner. iS hy ‘the European species, 7ringa vanellus, L., is a pretty bird, as large as a Pigeon, of a bronze-black, with a long and slender crest. It arrives in France in the spring, lives in the fields and meadows, builds there, and departs in autumn. The eggs are, considered a great delicacy.(1) ts Warm climates also have some species of this bird, whose wings are armed with one or two spurs, and others which have caruncles or wattles at the base of the beak: their tarsi are scu- tellated. ‘hey are Very noisy animals, screaming out at every sound they hear. They live in the fields, and defend themselves against birds of prey with much courage.(2) was Linnzus who applied it thus; but he placed many other birds in his genus Tringa, besides the Lapwings, the Sandpipers, (Calibris, Cuv.,) especially. (1) Add the Vanneau @ écharpe (Vann. cinctus’, Less. and Garn. Voy. Duperr. pl. xliii;—Le V. @ pieds jaunes (Vann. flavipes), Savigny, Egypte, Ois., pl. 6, f..3. (2) ‘Phey are the first nine species of Pasra, Gmel., particularly Parra cayen- nensis, Enl. 836;—P. goensis, Enl. 807;—P. senegalla, Enl. 362, or better Vanellus. albicapillus, Vieill., Gal. 236;—P. ludoviciana, Enl. 835, from which Vann. galli- ‘naceus, Tem., does not perhaps specifically differ, &c.; their habits, legs, beak, GRALLATORIA. 371 Hamaroprus, Lin. The Oyster-catchers have a somewhat longer beak than the Plovers or the Lapwings; it is straight, pointed, compressed into a wedge, and sufficiently strong to enable them to force open the bivalve shells of the animals on which they feed.’ They also seek for worms in the earth. The nasal fosse, which are very deep, are only half the length of the beak, the nostrils resembling a small slit in the middle. Their legs are of a moderate length, their tarsi reticulated, and their feet divided into three toes. Hematop. ostralegus, L.3.Enl. 9293 Brit. Zool., pl. Ds Catesb. I, 85, is the European species, also called Pie de mer on account of its plumage, which is black; the belly, throat, base of the wings and tail beingyof a fine white. The white on the throat disappears insummer. It is about the size of a Duck; oy and feet, red. : There is a species in Biz with alonger bill, and no white under the throat, the Hem. palliatus, Tem., which Wils. VIII, Ixiv, 2, confounds with the common one; another in the Ma- louines, where the black extends farther down on the breast, the Heem. luctuosus, Cuv., and a third in the antarctic hemisphere, which is entirely black, the (Hem. niger, Cuv.,) Ham. ater, _ Wieill. Gal. 230; Quoy and Gaymard, Voy. de Freycinet, pl. oe ¥XEXIV. It is impossible to avoid placing near the Plovers and Oyster- catchers, the Cursorius, Lac.—Tacuypromvs, Illig. Whose beak, more slender, but equally conical, is arcuated, has no groove, and is moderately cleft; the wings are shorter, and their legs, which are longer, are terminated by three toes without mem- branes, and without a thumb. There has been seen both in France and England, although very rarely, a’ species, belonging to the north of Africa, of a ight fawn-colour, with a whitish belly, the Charadrius gallicus, Gm.; Cursorius isabellinus, Meyer, Enl. 795; and another has been brought from India of a brownish-grey, with a red breast, the Ch. coromandelicus, Curs. asiaticus, Lath., Vieill. Gal. 232, form, and even the distribution of their colours, resemble those of the Lapwings and Ployers, and there can be no possible reason for placing them among the Ja- canas, whose characters differ on almost every point. Add 7'r. macroptera, anew species from Java; grey; head and belly black; armed, and with caruncles; the wings extending considerably beyond the tail. 372 ° | camparepben Enl. 892. Each of them has a black streak and a white one be- hind the eye. Their name is derived from the swiftness with which they run. Nothing is known with respect to their habits. (1) As far as we can judge from their exterior, it is here that we can most conveniently place the Carrama, Briss—Mricropactytus, Geofl.—DicuoLornuus, Illig.(2) Whose beak is longer and more hooked, the commissure extend- ing under the eye, which gives them somewhat of the physiognomy and disposition of birds of prey, and approximates them somewhat to the Herons. Their extremely long and scutellated legs are ter- minated by very short toes, slightly palmated at base, and bya thumb which cannot reach the ground. One species only is known, and that is from South America, the Micro. cristatus, Geoff.; Palamedea cristata, Gm.; Saria, Azzar.; Ann. du Mus. d’Hist. Nat., XIII, pl. xxvi; Col. 237, and Vieill. Gal. 259. Itis larger than the Heron, and feeds on lizards and insects, which it hunts for on high grounds and along the edges of forests. Its plumage is a fawn-coloured grey, waved with brown; some slender feathers on the base of the beak form alight tuft which inclines forwards. It flies but seldom, and then badly; its loud voice resembles that of a young Turkey. As its flesh is much esteemed, it has been domesticated in several’ places. FAMILY III. CULTRIROSTRES. This family is recognized by the thick, long, and strong beak, which is most generally trenchant and pointed, and is almost wholly composed of the birds comprised 1 in the genus Arvea of Linnzus. In a great number of species, the trachea (1) Add the Coure-vite a ailes violettes (Curs. Chalcopterus, T.\, Col. 298; 3—the C. . @ double collier (C. bicinctus, T.), Man. Orn.;—Curs. Teminckii, Sw ains. Zool. Ill, 106. (2) Microdactylus, short-finger. Dicholophus, crest in two rows. Hematopus, blood-coloured feet. M. Vieillot has preferred the barbarous name of Cogan, which must be pronounced Brprcni GRALLATORIA. 370 of the male forms various curves; their ceca are short, and even the true Herons have but one. °— We subdivide it into three tribes, the Cranes, the true Herons, and the Swans. The first tribe forms but one great genus. ; ; Grus, Lin. The Cranes have a straight beak, but slightly cleft; the membra- nous fosse of the nostrils, which are large and concave, occupy nearly one half of its length. Their legs are scutellated, and the toes moderate; the external ones but slightly palmate, and the thumb hardly reaching to the ground. A more or less considerable por- tion of the head and neck is destitute of feathers in nearly all of them. Their habits are more terrestrial, and their food more vege- table than those of the following genera: consequently they have a muscular gizzard, and long ceca. Their lower larynx has but one muscle on each side. At the head of this genus we place with Pal- las,(1) ' Psoputa, Lin., Or the Trumpeters, which have a shorter beak than the other species; the head and neck are merely invested with down, and the circumference of the eye is naked. They live in the woods, and feed on grain and fruit. The species best known is from South America, and is called the Trumpeter, (Psophia crepitans, L.,) Enl. 169, from its faculty of producing a low, deep sound, which at first seems to proceed from the anus. It is the size of a capon; the plumage is black- ish, which, on the breast, reflects a brilliant violet hue; the mantle is ash coloured, shaded above with fawn colour. It is a very grateful bird, and as susceptible of attachment to man as a dog. It is even said to be so docile as to take the command of the poultry-yard. It flies badly, but runs fast, and builds on the ground at the foot of a tree. Its flesh is eaten.(2) (1) Spicil. Zool. IV, 3. (2) At Cayenne, according to Barrere, it is called Agami; Caracara in the An- tilles, according to Dutertre. As the name of Z'rwmpeter is also given in Africa to a Calao, Fermin (Descrip. de Surin.) absurdly transfers'to the Agami the cha- -yacter of both beaks at once. The Agami was for a long while confounded with the Macucagua of Marcgrave, which is a Zinamou. Psophia is aname coined by Barrere from ¥c9¢0, to make a noise. Add, Psophia viridis, Spix, 83, and Ps. lewcoptera, Id. 84. 374 ' AVES. Certain Cranes, foreign to Europe, with a shorter beak than is found in those that belong to it, should come next. Ardea pavonia, L.; Grue couronné; Enl. 265, and the young, Vieill. 257. (Yhe Crowned Crane) Figure, light and graceful; four feet in height; ash coloured, black belly, fawn coloured rump, and white wings} its naked cheeks are tinged with white, and a bright rose-colour, and its head is crowned with a bundle of yellow, slender feathers, which it opens and displays at plea- sure. This beautiful bird, whose voice resembles the clang of a trumpet, inhabits the westetn Coast of Africa, where it is fre- quently kept in the huts, ‘and fed on grain, In a wild state it frequents inundated places, and preys on small fish. Ardea*virgo; Demoiselle de Numidie; Enl. 246. (The Numi- dian Crane.) Similar to the preceding in form, and almost in size; ash coloured; a black neck with two beautiful whitish aigrettes, formed by the prolongation of the slender feathers which cover the ears. Those which have been observed ina state of captivity were remarkable for their fantastic and affect- ed gestures. (1) ‘eb The Common Cranes have a beak as long as theshead, or longer. Ardea grus, L.; Grus cinerea, Bechst., Enl. 769; Frisch, 1943 Naum. Ed. I, 2, f- 2. (The Common Crane.) Four feet and upwards in height; ‘ash coloured; black throat; top of the head, red and maked; the rump ornamented with long, recurved and frizzled feathers, partly black. This bird has been cele- brated from the earliest ages for its regular migrations from north to south in the autumn, and vice versa in the spring, which it effects in immense and well ordered bodies. It feeds. on grain, but prefers the worms and insects of marshy grounds. This species.is often mentioned by the ancient writers, because the course of its migrations seems to be through Greece and eAsia Minor.(2) ‘ Between the Cranes and Herons we must place Ard. scolopacea, Gm.; Le Courlan, Enl. 848,(3) whose beak, (1) The anatomists of the Institute had applied to this bird, on account of its gestures, the names of Scops, Otus, and /sio, by which the ancients designated the Ducs of Europe (Bubo). Buffon, who had so well refuted this error as re- garded the Ducs, falls into it himself when speaking of the Ard. virgo. (2) To this genus also belong ard. canadensis, Edw.,133; the Grue 4 collier, ° Enl. 865, and the Crane of India, Edw. 45, (Ard. antigone) Vieill., Gal. 256;—the Grue blunche, En). 889, (Ard. americana) and the rd. gigantea, Pall., It., II, No. 50, t. I, which does not appear to us. to differ in the least from the white one;— finally, the rd. carunculata, which is not a Heron, as supposed by Gmelin. (S) Vieillot has made his genus Aramvs, Gal. p. 252, from this bird; Spix, pl. 91, calls it Rallus ardeordes. * * * g GRALLATORLE, — 375 Pas thinner and more cleft than that of the Grane, is inflated near the last third of its length, and whose toes, all tolerably long, are without any intervening membrane whatever. It has the habits, and is the size of a Heron; the plumage i is brown, with two white pencils on the neck. Ard. helias, L.;* Le Caurale earned Illig. )3(1) Oiseau de soleil, &c. Enl. 702. (The Sun-Bird.) ‘The commissure of its bill, which is more slender than that’of the Cranes, but fur- nished with similar nasal fossz, extends to beneath the eyes, like that of the Herons, but the beak itself is destitute of the naked skin atits base. Itis about the size of a Partridge, and its long slender neck, bredd and open tail, and rather short legs giveita very different appearance from that of any other Wader. Its plumage shaded in bands and lines with brown, fawn-colour, red, grey and black, recalls to our minds the colouring of the most beautiful of the nocturnal Lepidoptera. It is found on the banks of the rivers in Guiana. The second tribe is more carniyorous, and is known by its stronger beak and larger toes: we may place at its head, . CAncroma, isa, The Boat-bills, which would | closely approach the Herons in the strength of their beak and in the regimen resulting therefrom, but for t the extraordinary form of that organ, which we shall find, how- eyer, by close ‘examination, to be nothing more than the beak of a Heton or Bittern, very much flattened. In fact, it is very wide from right,to left, and is formed like two spoons, the concave sides of which are placed.in contact. The mandibles are strong and trench- ant, the upper one having a sharp tooth on each side of its points’ the nostrils, situated near its base, are continued on in two parallel grooves to near the point. There are four toes to the feet, long, and almost without membranes, and accordingly we find that these birds perch upon trees on the banks of rivers, whence they precipitate themselves upon the fish, which constitute their customary food. Their gait is slow, and‘in their attitudes, they resemble the Herons. » ~The species known is, Cancr. cochlearia, L.3 Enl. 38 and 369; Vieill. Gal. pl. 249. (The Boat-bill.) Size of a hen; whitish; grey or brown back; red belly; a white forehead, followed by a black calotte, which, (1) Vieillot has changed this name into that of Helias. 376 ' AVES. 7 in the adult maley is changed into a long tuft: inhabits the hot and marshy parts of South America. Then comes, — ; ARrbDEA, Cuv. Or the Herons, the cleft of whose beak extends to beneath the eyes, a small nasal fossa continuing on in a groove close to its point. They are also distinguished by the internal edge of the nail of the middle toe, which is trenchant and dentigulated. Their legs are scutellated; the thumb and toes tolerably long, the external web con- siderable, and the eyes placed in a naked skin which extends to the beak. Their stomach is a very large, but slightly muscular sac, and they have but one very small cecum. They are melancholy birds, which build and perch on the banks of rivers, where they de- stroy great numbers of fish. ‘There are many species in both conti- nents, which can only be divided by a reference to some details of plumage. t The true Herons have a very slender neck, ornamented below with long pendent feathers. Ard. major, and Ard. cinerea, L.; Enl. 755 and 787; Frisch, 198, 199; Naum. Ed. I, 25, f. 38, 34. (The Common Heron.) Bluish ash colour;.a black tuft on the occiput; fore-part of the neck white, sprinkled with black tears; a large bird, whose depredations on the fish, in the rivers of Europe, Heel it highly prejudicial. It was formerly much celebrated for ‘the sport it afforded to falconers. pee / 4.) Ard. purpurea, Enl. 788; Naum. Ed. I, Supp. 45, f. 89, 90.(1) (The Purple Heron.) Grey and red, or purple; belongs a also to Europe. > i The name of Crapraters, (Crabiers,) has been applied to, the, smallest Herons, with shorter feet. The species,most common in France, aud found in its mountain districts, is, Ard. minuta and danubialis, Gm.; Le Blongios; Enl. 3235, Frisch, 207; Naum. Ed. I, 28, f. 37. Fawn coloured; calotte, back, and quills black. It is hardly larger than a Rallus, and frequents the vicinity of ponds. (1) The ard. purpurea, purpurata, rufa, Gm., and the africana, Lath., accord- ing to Meyer, are mere varieties of the purple Heron. Add J. herodias, Gm.; Wils. VIII, Ixy, 2, the young of which is, perhaps, Enl. 858;—A. cocoi, Lath.; Spix, XC, under the false name of Ard. maquaris jaa. sibila- trix, T. Col. 271;—4. ludoviciana, Gm. Enl. 909, from which the 4. virescens does not specifically differ;—.2. Nove-Guinz, Lath. Enl. 926, approaches somewhat t the 4. scolopacea, Gm. in the beak, GRALLATORLA. 377 The Onorgs, to the form of the Crabeaters, add the size of the true Heron, and the colour of the Bitterns.(1) The Ecrers are Herons whose feathers, on the lower part of the back, at a certain period become long and attenuated. The most beautiful species, whose feathers are employed for the ‘purpose which the name of these birds indicates, are: Ard. garzetta; Enl. 901. (The Little Egret.) But half the size of the Heron. It is all white, and its slender feathers do not extend beyond the tail. Ard. alba; Enl. 886. (The Great Egret.) This one is also en- tirely white, but larger. Both these species are found in Europe, where a third inhabits, whose tarsi are shorter, and whose at- » _tenuated feathers extend considerably beyond the tail; it is the * A. egretta, En\. 925.(2) We have also thought it proper to approximate to the Egrets the 4rd. comata, Gm.; Enl. 348; Naum. Ed. I, 22, f. 45. (The Crabeater of Mahon.) A bird of southern Europe, with a red- dish-brown back, and white belly and tail. The adult has a yellowish neck, and a long tuft on the occiput.(3) The feathers on the neck of the Brrrrrns are loose and separated, which increases its apparent size. They are usually spotted orstriped. A. stellaris, Enl. 789; Frisch, 205; Naum. Ed. I, 27, f. 36. (The European Bittern.) A golden fawn-colour, spotted and dotted with black; beak and feet greenish; is found among the reeds, whence it sends forth that terrific voice which has enti- tled it to the name of Bos taurus. Its attitude, when at rest, is singular; the beak being raised towards the heavens.(4) (1) 2. lineata, Gm. Enl. 860;—.72. tigrina, Id. Enl. 790, which appears to be the young of 2. flava, Gm. (2) Temminck thinks that the 2. alba is the young of the 4. egretta, and that the pl. Enl. 901 does not represent the Little Egret of Europe, but that of America, (3) From the exact observations of Meyer, the 2. castunea, Gm. or the ralloz- des, Scopol.;—A. squaiotta;—A. Marsiglii;—A. pumila, and even A. erythropus, and A. malaccensis, Gm. Enl. 911, are all mere varicties, or different ages of the Crab- eater of Mahon, or 4. comata. The 2. senegalensis, Enl. 315, is also a young age of the same bird. It is perhaps the true Crane of the Balearic Islands of Pliny, XI, 37. Add, &. candidissima, Wils. LXIU, 4;—the Garde-boeuf, 4. bubulcus, Savign. Eg. Ois., pl. viii;—A. leucocephala, Gm. Enl. 910;—2. jugularis, Forster, or gularis, Bosc., Act. de la Soc. d’Hist. Nat. fol. pl. ii, or adbicollis, Vieill. Galer. 255;—4. cerulea, Enl. 349, of which the 4. aquinoctialis, Catesb, may probably be the young, notwithstanding the difference of colour;—J. rufescens, Gm. Enl, 902;— A. leucogaster, Enl. 330;—A. agami, Enl. 859. [Add 4. Peal, Bonap. and £. ludoviciana, Wils. V1L, pl. Ixiv, f. 1. dm. Ed) (4) Add 4. minor, Wils. Vil, Ixv, 3, or 4. stellaris, B. Gm.; Edw., 136;—4. Vou. LL—2 X 378 AVES. The adult Nicur-Herron, with the port of the Bitterns, and a beak proportionably thicker, has a few slender feathers on the occiput. There is but one species found in France, Ard. nycticorax, L.; Bihoreau d’Europe(1) Enl. 7583 Epes, 203; Naum, Ed. I, 26, f. 35. (The Night Heron.) The male is white; back and Bioite black; the young bird, Enl. 759, grey with a brown mantlegand a blackish calotte. (2) ! We must observe, however, that these various subdivisions of the Herons are of but little importance, and are by no means well marked. The third tribe, besides having a thicker and smoother beak than is found in the second, has tolerably strong and. almost equal membranes between the base of the toes. Ciconra, Cuv. The Storks have a thick beak, moderately cleft; no fossz or grooves; the nostrils pierced towards the back and near the base; an extremely short tongue. Their legs are reticulated, and the anterior toes strongly palmated at base, particularly the external ones. The light and broad mandibles of their beak, by striking against each other, produce a clash which is almost the only sound that proceeds from these birds. Their gizzard is but slightly muscular, and their ceca so small that they are scarcely perceptible. Their lower larynx has no peculiar muscle; their bronchiz are longer than common, and composed of more than the usual number of rings. There are two species in France, Ardea ciconia, L.; Enl. 886; Frisch, 196; Naum. Ed. I, 29, f. (The White Stork.) White; quills of the wings black; feet and beak red. A large bird, held in great veneration by the people, a distinction arising from the fact that it destroys snakes and other noxious reptiles. It prefers building its nest on towers, in steeples, &c.; and after having once constructed undulata, Gm. Enl. 768;—.2. philippensis, Gm. Enl. 908. [Add, also, 4. violacea, Wils. VII, pl. Ixv, f..1;—.2. cxrulea, Wils. VII, pl. lxii, f. 3;—4. virescens, Wils. VU, lxi, f. 1;—4. exilis, Wils. VIL, pl. lxv, f. 4. 4m. Ed.) (1) According to Meyer, the results of whose labours we still follow, the Ard. grisea, A. maculata, and the 1. badia of Gmel. are different states of the 4. nyeti- corax. (2) Add 4. pileata, Lath., or 4. alba, @; Gm., Enl. 907;—A. caledonica, Lath. ;— A. cayennensis, Enl. 899, or violacea, Wils. VII, lxv, 1, of which 2. jamaicensis, Gm. is the young;—.7. sibilatriz, T. Col. 271.—The Pouacre, Buff. (Ard. Gardeni, Gm.) Enl. 309, appears to be the young of an ash coloured Night Heron, with 2 bronze-black calotte and back. It is the same as the .2. maculata, Frisch, 202. GRALLATORIE. 379 it, returns to the same spot in the spring, passing the winter in Africa. Ard. nigra, L.; Enl. 3993 and the young, Frisch, 197; Naum. 23, f. 32. (The Black Stork.) Blackish, with purple reflec- tions; belly, white. Haunts solitary marshes, and builds in forests.(1) Among various species we may distinguish, The Bare-necked Storks, Which have a thicker beak than the others, but one composed of a light substance; and among them The Pouched Storks, Ard. dubia, Gm.—Ard. algala, Lat. Which have an appendage under the middle of the throat, resem- bling a a thick sausage, and from under whose wings are procured the feathers forming those light plumes called by the French, Ma- rabous. They are the largest birds of the genus; their belly is white, and their mantle a bronze-black. There are two species, Cic. marabou, Tem., Col. 300, from Senegal, with a uniform mantle, and Cic. argala, Tem., Col. 301, from.India, whose “wing-coverts are edged with white. By means of their broad bill, they are enabled to capture birds on the wing.(2) ° Mycrerta, Lin. The Jabirus, separated from Ardea by Linnzus, are closely allied to the Storks, and much more so than the latter are to the true Herons; the moderate opening of their beak, the nostrils, the reticulated envelope of the tarsi, and the extent of the membranes between the ‘toes are the same as in the Storks; their mode of life is also similar. Their peculiar character consists in a beak slightly curved upwards _ hear the extremity. Myct. americana, L.3(3) Enl. 817 (The American Jabiru), (1) To this genus also belongs the Maguari, or American Stork, (4. maguari) Vieill. Galer. 254; and Spix, LXXXIX, under the wrong name of Ciconia jubura, which, with the exception of its ash coloured beak, differs but little from our White Stork;—the little C. noire de Nubie (Cie. Abdimii, Lichtenst.) Ruppel. 8;— the C. violette (C. leucocephala, Gm.) Enl. 906. (2) Add the Cigogne chevelue (C. capillata,T.), Col. 312. (3) Vowyouyou in Cayenne; Azaiai in Paraguay, Collier rouge, &c. Barrere has confounded it with the .2merican Ostrich, which has caused the name of Touyouyou, or Touyou, to be transferred to that bird by Brisson and by Puffon. Mycteria, a name derived by Linnzus from wuxrnp, nose, proboscis, on account of its large beak. 380 AVES. “2 ; is the most known species. It is very large; ‘whites eng and © neck naked, and invested with a black skin, the lower part of which is reds a few white feathers on the occiput only; beak and feet black. Found along the borders of ponds and marshes in South America, where it preys upon reptiles and fish.(1) Scopus, Briss.(2) The Umbres are only distinguished from the Storks by a éompress- ed beak, whose trenchant ridge is inflated near the base, and whose nostrils are continued by a groove, which runs parallel with the . ridge to its end, the latter being slightly hooked. Only one species is known, ‘* @ Scop. umbretia, Enl. 796; Vieill. Galer. 250 (The mbre), ’ which is the size of a Crow, and of an umber colour. The occiput of the male is tufted. Found throughout Africa. ‘ a f Hrans, Lacep.—Anastomus, Illig. These birds are only separable from the Storks by a character of * about equal consequence with that of the Jabiru. Their two man-* dibles only come in contact at the base and point, leaving an inter- ' * val between the middle of their edges. Even this seems to be the ~ result of detrition, for the fibres of the horny substance of the beak, ~ which appear to ve been worn away, are very visible. They are from the East Indies. One is whitish, Ardea pon- ficeriana, Gm., Enl. 932; and Vieill. Gal. 251, and the other a ‘ brown-grey,—.rdelia coromandeliana, Sonner. \t., 11,219. The ~ quills of the wings and tail are black in both. Perhaps the last one may be the young of the first. A third, of an irised- black, Bec-owvert a lames; An. lamelliger, Tem. Col. 236, is re- markable because the stem of each of its feathers terminates in a narrow horny plate, which extends beyond the barbs. The Dromas, Paykull, ) Strongly resembles the preceding birds, having the same feet and | carriage, but its compressed beak, the under part of which is some- what inflated at base, is perforated by oval nostrils, and its edges join closely. Dromas ardeola, Payk., Stockh. Mem., 1805: pl. 83 Col. 362. The only species known. Its plumage is white; part of the (1) Add, Myc. senegalensis, Lath., Vaill. Gal. 255, from which the Ciconia ephippirhyncha, Rupp. Av- 3, only differs in being drawn from the recent specimen, and showing two tufts or bobs at the base ofthe beak. (2) Scopus, from Sxczec, sentinel. GRALLATORIE. f 381 mantle and wings black. From the shores of the Red Sea, and of the Senegal river.(1) TanTatus, Lin. The Wood-Pelicans have the feet, nostrils and beak of the Stork; but the back of the beak is rounded, its point curved downwards, and slightly emarginated on each side: a part of their head and sometimes of the neck, is destitute of feathers. ° T. loculator, L.; Enl. 868; Wils. VIII, lxvi, 1. (The Wood- Pelican of America.) Is the size of a Stork, but more slender; white; quills of the wings and tail, black; beak and feet, as welk as the naked skin of the head and neck, blackish. It inhabits both Americas, arriving in each country about the rainy season, and frequenting muddy waters, where it chiefly hunts for eels. It is a stupid bird, whose gait.is very slow. T. ibis, L. Enl. 339. (The Wood-Pelican of Africa.) White, lightly shaded with purple on the wings; beak yellow; skin of the face red and naked. This is the bird which has long been considered by naturalists as the Jbis of the ancient Egyptians, but recentresearches have proved that the Ibis is amuch smaller bird, of which we shall speak hereafter. The Tantalus is not even usually found in Egypt; the specimens we possess are brought from Senegal. T. leucocephalus; Tantale de Ceylan, Encyc. Method. Orn. pl. 66, fig. 1; Vieill. Gal. 247 (The Wood-Pelican of Ceylon), is the largest of all, and has the stoutest beak. This beak and the skin of the face are yellow; plumage white, with black quills; a black cincture round the breast; long rose-coloured feathers on the rump, which are shed during the rainy sea- son.(2) * PLaTALEA, Lin.(3) The Spoonbills approximate to the Storks in the whole of their structure; but their bill, whence they derive their name, is long, flat, broad throughout, becoming widened and flattened, particularly at the end, so as to form a spatula-like disk; two shallow grooves, originating at its base, extend almost to the end, but without being A (1) Dupont, Ann. des Sc. Nat. tom. IX, pl. xlv. It is the Lrodia amphilensis, Salt., Voy. in Abyss., Atl, pl. xxxi. (2) Add the 7° dacteus, T. Col. 352. (3) Platalea, or Platea, Latin names, sometimes used as synonymous with Peli- canus, 382 AVES. parallel to its edges. The nostrils are oval, and situated at a short distance from the origin of each groove. Their small tongue, reti- culated legs, the extent of the membranes of their feet, their two very small ceca, their but slightly muscular gizzard, and their lower larynx destitute of peculiar muscles, are the same as in the Storks, but the expansion of their bill deprives it of all its strength, and renders it fit for nothing but turning up mud, or capturing small fish or aquatic insects. » P. leucorodia, Gm.; Enl. 405; Naum. Supp. 44, f. 87. (The White Spoonbill.) All white, and a crest on the occiput; it is found throughout the eastern continent, where it builds on high trees. The * Spatule blanche sans huppe,”’ Buff. Hist. des Ois. tom. VII, pl. 24, according to Bail, is but the young of this species. Besides the absence of the crest, it is distinguished by the quills of the wings having a black edge. P. aiaia; La Spatule rose; Enl. 165; Vieill. Gal. 248. (The Roseate Spoonbill.) The face is naked, and the plumage tinged with various shades of a bright rose-colour which becomes more * intense with age. It is peculiar to South America. “ he FAMILY IV. LONGIROSTRES. This family is composed of a multitude of Waders, most of which were included in the genus Scolopax of Linnzus, and "the remainder confounded in that of Zringa, L., though partly in opposition to the character of this genus, which consists in a thumb too short to reach the ground. A small number were placed among the Plovers on account of the total absence of a thumb. All these birds have nearly the same form, similar habits and very frequently even a similarity in the distribu- tion of their colours, which renders it a difficult matter to dis- tinguish one from another. Their general character is a long, slender, and feeble bill, the use of which is restricted to search-. ing in the mud for worms and insects; the different gradations in the form of this bill serve to divide them into genera and subgenera. According to his own principles, Linneus should have united most of these birds in the great genus % GRALLATORIA, 383 ScoLopax, Lin. Which we divide as follows, according to the variation in the form of the bill.(1) The . Isis, Cuv. Separated by us from the Tantalus of Gmelin, because the bill, though arcuated like that of Tantalus, is much more feeble, and has no emargination near its point; the nostrils also, perforated near the back of its base, are severally prolonged in a groove which ex- tends to the end. Besides, this bill is tolerably thick and almost square at base, and some part of the head or even of the neck is always destitute of feathers. The external toes are considerably palmated at base, and the thumb is sufficiently large to bear upon the ground. ’ Some of them have short and reticulated legs; they are usually the stoutest, and have the largest beak. Ibis religiosa, Cuy.; Abou-Hannes, Bruce, It., pl. 353 Tantalus zthiopicus, Lath.; the adult, Cuv., Oss. Foss. tom. I, and the young, Savign. Descript. de Egypte, Hist. Nat. des Ois., pl. 7 (The Sacred Ibis), is the most celebrated species. It was reared in the temples of ancient Egypt, with a degree of respect bordering on adoration; and, when dead, it was embalmed. This, according to some, arose from its devouring serpents, + which otherwise might have infested the country; others again are of opinion that it took its origin from some relation between its plumage and one of the phases of the moon; while athird class of authors attribute it to the fact that its appearance announced ed the overflow of the Nile.(2) The Tantalus of Africa was for a long time considered as the Ibis of the Egyptians; it is now known to be a bird of the present genus, as large as a Hen, with white plumage, the tips of the wing-quills excepted, which are black; the barbs of the last coverts are slender, and of a black colour, with violet reflections, and cover the tips of the wings and the tail. The bill and feet, as well as the naked part of the , head and neck, are black: this part, at an early age, is covered with small blackish feathers, or, at all events, its upper surface is thus furnished. Found throughout Africa.(3) (1) This is another of these distinctions and names borrowed by Vieill. (Gal. 246) without any acknowledgement, although my memoir upon the Ibis,in which I establish it, is dated fifteen years prior to any of his writings upon birds. (2) Savigny, Mem. sur l’Ibis. (S$) There is a neighbouring species in the Moluccas which has a longer beak, 384 AVES. Others have scutellatéd legs; their beak, most commonly, is more slender. Ib. rubra; Scol. rubra, L.; Tantal. ruber, Gm.; Enl. 80 and 815 Wils, VIII, Ixvi, 2. (The Red Ibis.) A bird found in all the hot parts of America, remarkable for its bright red colour; the tips of the wing-quills are black. The young ones, at first co- vered with a blackish down, become cinereous, and, when ready to fly, whitish; in two years the red makes its appearance, and _continues to increase in lustre with age. This species does not migrate, and lives in flocks in marshy spots in the vicinity of estuaries. It is easily domesticated. Scol. falcinellus, L.; Courlis vert, Enl. 819; Naum. Ed. 1, Supp. 28, Savig. Eg. Ois. pl. vii, f. 9. (The Green Ibis.) A purple brown-red; mantle of a deep green; the head and neck of the young marked with whitish dots. It is a beautiful bird of south- ern Europe, and of northern Africa, and most probably the spe- cies denominated by the ancients the Black Ibis.(1) Numentus, Cuv.(2) The Curlews have the beak arcuated like that of the Ibis, but it is more slender, and round throughout: the tip of the upper man- dible extends beyond the end of the lower one, and projects a little downwards in front of it. The toes are palmated at base. Scol. arcuata, L., Enl. 818; Frisch, 224; Naum. 5, f. 5. (The Curlew of Europe.) Is the size of a Capon; brown; the edges of all the feathers, whitish; rump, white; tail, striped with white and brown. Common along the coast of Europe, and in transitu in the interior. Its name is derived from its cry.(3) the coverts less slender, and partly varied with white; long and pointed feathers on the upper part of the breast, (bis molucca, Cuv.) and another in Bengal, with but slightly attenuated ash coloured coverts (/bis bengala, Cuv.). Add Ib. papillosa, T. Col. 304;—Tunt. caluus, Gm., Enl. 867;—L bis nudifrons, Spix, 86;—Jb. oxycercus, 1d. 87;—T". albicollis, Gm. or Curicaca of Marcgr., Enl. 976;—Tant. cayennensis, Gm., Enl. 820;—Ibis plumbeus, T. Col. 235;—T'ant. melanopis, Gm.; Lath., 111, a Ixxix;—J6. chalcoptera, Vieill. Gal. 246, or T'ant. hogedash, Lath. (1) Add Tantalus albusand T. coco, Gm.; Enl. 193;—T. cristatus, 1d. ; Enl. 841;— Ibis leucopygus, Spix, 88, if it should not prove to be the young of the ruber;— T'ant. leweocephalus, Lath., U1, pl. xxx, 2. [N.B. The J. fuscus of Gm. is the young of the 7. albus, Id. Am. Ed.] (2) Numenius, derived from néoménie, new moon, on account of its crescert shaped beak. (3) Add the Courlis a méches étroites of the Cape (Num. virgatus, C.), Enl. 198;— the C. a m. ét. of India (IV. lineatus);—the Num. longirostris, Wils. of America, Am. Orn. II, xxiv, 4;—Mum. hudsonius, Id. LXVI, f. 1. GRALLATORI&. , 385 Scol. Pheopus, L.; Petit Courlis; Enl. 1423 Edw. 3075 Frisch, 225; Naum. 10,f. 10.(1) Half the size of the PEERED but has nearly the same plumage.(2) Scotopax, Cuy.(3) The Snipes have a straight beak, the nasal furrows extending to near its point which is a little inflated externally to reach beyond the lower mandible, and on the middle of which there is a simple groove; this point is soft and very sensible, and when dried, after death, assumes a punctured appearance. Their feetare not palmated. A peculiar character of these birds consists in their compressed head and large eyes placed very far back, which gives them a singularly stupid air, an indication which is confirmed by their habits. Scol. rusticola, L.; La Bécasse; Enl. 885; Frisch, 126, 227; Naum. Ed. I, I, f. 1. (The Woodcock.). The well known plumage of this bird is variegated above with grey, red and black spots and bands; grey beneath, with transverse blackish lines. Its distinguishing character consists of four broad, trans- verse, black bands, which succeed each other on the back part of the head. During the summer it inhabits lofty mountains, and descends into the woods in the month of October. It lives either singly or in pairs, particularly in bad weather, and feeds on worms and insects. Few of them remain on the plains during summer.(4) Scol. gallinago, L.; La Bécassine, Enl. 883; Frisch, 2295 _Naum.°3, f. 3. (The Snipe.) Smaller than the preceding, and with a longer beak; is distinguished by two broad, longitudinal black bands on the head, by the neck spotted with brown and fawn colour, by a blackish mantle with two longitudinal fawn ® (1) Pheopus (ash-coloured foot), a name composed by Gesner. (2) Add the Num. tenuirostris, Ch. Bonap.;—the Num. rufus, Vieill. Gal. 245; —the Courlis demi-bec (Num. brevirostris, T.), Col. 381. N.B. In this genus, and almost in the whole of this family, the beak becomes lengthened by age. . (8) Scolopax, the Greek name of the Woodcock, from cxoac}, stake, on ac- count of its straight and pointed beak. Vieillot has changed it into Rusricoxa. (4) Add a closely allied species of North America (Scol. minor, Gm.), Arct, Zool. II, pl. xix; Vieill. Gal. 242; Wils., VI, xlviii, 2;—Scol. sabini, Vig., Lin. Trans. XIV, pl. xxi, if a true species. (5) Add the Bécassine muette of Eur., Scol. Brehmii, Kaup., Isis. 1823;—WScol. paludosa, Gm. Enl. 895, which is the Sc. gallinago, Wils. VI, xlvii, 1;—Scol. gigan. tea, Tem. Col. 403. The Brunette of Buffon, Scol. pusilla Dunlin of the English, is only the Tringa alpina, Gm. Vou. 208 386 _ AYES. coloured bands, by its brown wings watered with grey, by a whitish belly, the flanks watered with brown, &c. It frequents marshes, edg of rivulets, &c. and ascends out of sight, pour- ing out its piercing note from a great distance, which sounds like the bleating of a goat. It is found in nearly the same state in all parts of the globe. He major, Gm.; La double Bécassine; Frisch, 2283 taster 2. (The Great Snipe.) Is distinguished from the preceding i wa a third larger,’and by the grey or fawn coloured un- dulations above being smaller, and the brown ones beneath larger and more numerous. , Scol. gallinula, Gm.; La Sourde; Enl. 884; Friseh, 231; Naum. 4, f. 4. (The Jack Snipe.) Nearly one half smaller than the Scol. gallinago; has but one black band on the head; the ground of the mantle reflects a bronze- “green; a grey demi-collar on the neck; the flanks spotted like the breast with brown; it remains nearly the whole year in the marshes of Europe. We should distinguish from all others, the Sc. grisea, Gm.; Wils. VII, lviii, 13 Se. Paykullit, Nils. Orn. ~ Suec. II, pl. 2, and in summer plumage,» Scol. Noveboracensis, Lath. (The Red-breasted Snipe.) Which differs in the external toes being semi-palmated. It is more ash+coloured in winter, and more reddish in summer, the rump always white, spot ed vith black. It is also seen in Europe.(1) * 6 a on hd RuyYncH2zA, Cuy.(2) & ~ Pm > e 4 Birds of India and Africa, whose nearly equal mandibles are slightly arcuated at the end, and in which the nasal fossz extend to the tip of the upper one, which has no third grooye. 'Theirfeet' are not palmated. To the port of Snipes they add more lively colours, and are particularly remarkable for the ocellated ‘spots. sind corate the quills of both wings and tail. These birds are found of various colours, and Gmelin, c a: dering them as varieties, unites them under the name of Scol. capensis. M. 'Temminck also considers them as different ages of one bird. (3) ve (1) It appears that Vicillot restricts the name of Scolopar to this subdivision, that is, if, as I think, his pl. 241 represents this bird; it is not, eile exact. M. Leach makes his genus Macroramrats of it. (2) Vieillot has adopted this name and genus, Gal. pl. 240. (3) Seol. capensis, 6, Gm. Enl. 922, should be the adult; Scol. capensis, yy en. ~ 881, or Rynchzxa variegata, Vicill., Galer. 240, the young, and Enl. 270, an inter- mediate age. The Chevalier vert, Briss. and Buff. (Rallus benghalensis, Gm.), Al- bin. TIT, 90, is also of ‘this genus, and does not even appear to differ from the va- j GRALLATORIZ. 387 Limosa, Bechst.(1) The Godwits have a straight beak, longer than the Snipes, and sometimes even slightly arcuated near the top. The nasal groove extends close to the tip, which is blunt and somewhat depressed; no third groove or punctation on its surface. The external toes are pal- mated at base. Their form is more slender, and their legs longer than those of Snipes; they frequent salt marshes and the sea-shore. Scol. leucophzea, Lath., and laponica, Gm.; Barge aboyeuse; the young, Brit. Zool. pl. xiii; Briss. V, pl. xxiv, f.2; the adult in summer plumage, Enl. 900.(2) (The Common Godwit.) In winter, a deep brown-grey, the feathers edged with white; the breast, a brown-grey; whitish above; rump, white striped with brown, &c. In summer it is red, with a brown back. The tail is always striped with white and black. Scol. ceegocephala and belgica, Gm.; Limosa melanura, Leisler; in winter plumage, Enl. 874; in that of summer, Ib. 916. (The Black-tailed Godwit.) In winter a cinereous grey, browner on the back; white belly; in summer} head, neck, and breast, reds the mantle, brown spotted with red; beneath, striped with brown, red and white, bands; tail always black, edged with white at the tip. These two birds are double the size of the Woodcock, and their changes of plumage have occasioned va- ’ rious multiplications of the species. The last, during the sum- mer?, covers the plains of New Holland. Its cry is very shrill 4 and resembles that of a Goat.(3) so) **%\ Caupris, Cuv.—Trinea, Temm.(4) *, "a " ¥ We. e “a: The bill of the Sandpiper$ is depressed at the end, and the nasal ‘aes | ee ee ee ee ee eee ee ee SS aaa a tiety represented, Enl. 922. N.B. This last plate is the only one that gives a cor- rect representation of the beak peculiag to this little subgenus. Add, a very dis- tinct species from Brazil, Dhipachand lara Val., Bullet. des Sc. de Ferussac, Gand. ; § (1) Vieillot has changed this name into Limrcuza, Gal. 243. (2) Gmelin has made the young of this bird a variety of the following species, - and quotes the fig. of Brisson, by the name of Svol. glottis, which is a Ruff. The adult is his Scol. laponica. The Limosa Meyeri, Leisl. and Temm., is this species in its winter livery, and Lim. rufa, the same in its summer plumage. oh (3) Add Scol. fedoa, L.; Wils. VII, pl. lvi, 4, or the Limicula marmorata, Vieill. Galer. 243. We might distinguish the Scol. terek or Sc. cinerea, Gm.; Guldenst., Noy. Act. Petrop., XIX, pl. xix, whose beak is curved upwards, and whose feet are semi-palmated. It leads to the Recurvirostres. ‘i (4) Calidris, ‘an ash coloured and spotted bird, frequenting rivers and woods,” Aristotle. Brisson has applied it to the Great Sandpiper. 388 AVES. fossz are very long as in the Godwits, but this bill is not usually longer than the head; their slightly bordered toes have no mem- branes at base, and their thumb can hardly reach the ground; their moderately long legs and short figure give them a heavier carriage than that of the Godwits. They are also much smaller. Tringa grisea, Tr. cinerea, and T'r. canutus, Gm.; La Mau- béeche, Enl. 366; Edw. 276; Wils. VII, lvii, 2. (The Sandpi- per.) Winter plumage ash-coloured above, white beneath, with blackish spots on the front of the neck and breast. In its sum- mer livery, 7'r. islandica, Gm., or Tr. rufa, Wils. VII, lvii, 5, it is spotted above, fawn colour and blackish; underneath, red. The 7r. ncevid, Enl. 365, is an intermediate state. The coverts of the tail are always white striped with black, and its quills grey. Nearly as large as a Snipe. Tr. maritima, Brun; Tr. nigricans, Montag., Lin. Trans. 1V, pl. 11, f. 25; Brit. Zool. in fol., pl. c. 2, f. 1. Somewhat less than the preceding; grey; the mantle blackish; wings undulated with whitish; whitish belly. It is common on the coast of Hol- land, rare in France. Always settles on stones.(1) Anrenaria, Bechst.—Catipris, Vig. The Sanderlings resemble the Sandpipers in every point but one, viz. they have no thumb, as is the case with the Plovers. The species known, Charadrius calidris, Gm. Briss. V, pl. xx, § 2; Vieill. Gal. 254, is, in winter, greyish above; front and underneath white; blackish wings, varied with, white; Wils.,° VII, lix, A. In summer, its back is spotted with fa -colour and black, and its breast dotted with blackish, —Char. rubidus, Wils., VII, Ixiii, 3.(2) ° “> : ? ‘ Peipna, Cuv. BY. : #4 . hg The Pelidnz are merely small Sandpipers, with a bill somewhat longer than the head. The edging”of their feet is insensible. Tringa cinclus and alpina; Alouette de mer (The Sea-Lark), is a third smaller than the Great Sandpiper, and like it, in winter, (1) Add of European species: 7'r. Temminckii, Leisler, Col. 41, 4;—T'r. minuta, Leis]. Naum. 21. f. 50. Of species foreign to that country: 7'r. lewcoptera, Gm., Lath. Syn. II, pl. lxxxii;—7'r. albescens, Tem. Col. 41, 1;—T'r. maculosa, Vieill. Dict.;x—T'r. pusilla, Wils., pl. xxxvii, 4. Add T'r. islandica, L., Wils. VII, p.. lvii, f. 2,5. Am. Ed. (2) It has been confounded with the 4lowette de mer, in its winter plumage, otherwise the little Sandpiper, or 7'r. arenaria. Brisson, in particular, gives the figure of the one, and the description of the other. The Calidris tringozdes, Vieill. Gal. 234, seems to be a bad figure of this bird in its summer livery. “ > GRALLATORIEZ. 389 is ash-coloured above, white beneath, and the breast shaded with grey; in summer, its plumage is fawn-coloured above, spotted with black, small black spots front of the neck and breast, and a black patch under the belly. It is then the 7’. alpina, Gm., or Tr. cinclus, B.“Enl. 852; Wils., VII, lvi, 2. The 77. cinclus, L., Enl. 851, is an intermediate state.(1) The Cocortr only differs from the Sea-larks by its beak being slightly arcuated. The species known, Scolopax subarcuata, Gm.; Numenius afri- canus, Lath.; Naum. 21, f. 28 and 20; f. 27, is, in winter, black- ish above, undulated with grey and whitish beneath; in summer the back is spotted with black and fawn-colour, the wings are grey, and the head and under part of the body red. It is found everywhere, though very rarely. The Fatcinetivs(2) Has : a E beek somewhat more arcuated than that of the Cocorli; the thumb, moreover, is deficient. One. species only is known, Scol. pygmza, L., a native of Africa, but which has sometimes been seen in Europe. r Macueres, Cuv.(3) we The Ruffs are true Sandpipers in their bill and carriage; the ~ membrane between their external toes, however, is nearly as exten- sive as in Totanus, Limosa, &c. a + One species only is known, the 7ringa pugnaz, L., Enl. 305, A i +1306. “It is somewhat smaller than a snipe, and celebrated for +” the furious combats which take place among the males in the ® ‘nuptial season. At this period the head is partly covered with ‘red papille, the neck is: surrounded with a thick collar of fea- thers, so variously arranged and coloured, and projecting in such, fantastic positions, that no two individuals can be found alike; even before this epoch there is so much diversity in their ; plumage, that many imaginary species have been described by naturalists.(4) Their feet are always yellowish, which with (1) This is most probably the place for the 7'ringa macroptera, Spix, XCII. Add Am. Spec. T'r. Schinzii, Brehm.;—T'r. pectoralis, Bonap.;—T'r. platyr- hinca, Temm. Am. Ed. (2) Vieillot has changed this name into Erotra. It is not, as has been asserted, destitute of a thumb. , (3) MayxInc, pugnator. Teasdyoc, fuscus. *. (4) The Chevalier varié, Buff., Sp. IV; Briss. V, pl..xvii, 2 (T'ringa litiorea, L.; T'ringu ochropus, B.; littorea, Gm.). The Chevalier, properly so called, Buff. F * ae 390 | SAEs. , their beak and their semi-palmated external toes, furnish a mark which may assist us to recognize them. This bird, common to the whole north of fs oF also found on the coast of France, particularly in o tg spring, but it does not build there.(1) VS ey une There are some small birds in Anite resembling the Sand- pipers, whose feet are semi-palmated nteriorly;, (the Hemrpa- LtaMA, Bonap.) Tinga semi Palinatay Wils. pe VII, Ixiii,» 45 Tringa brevirostris, Spix, xoili. im «2 y It appears that it is near the spilt, we en place the - a a hg -EURINORHYNCHUS, Wilson Lee § Which is distinguished from them by ith ‘depressed bill, malttoe at the end almost like that of the Spoonbill, ‘the any known species of which, ' fp Opi’ Platalea pygmea, L.; ; Eurinorhynchus griseus, Wils., Thunb., Acad., Suec., pl. VI, is one of the rarest i in existence, fo only a single individual has been found: it is grey y above, white be- neath, and hardly as large as a Pelidna. 2 Sik be a PHALAROPUS, Brits. (By. Small birds, whose bill, though flatter than that of the Sandpi pers J is similarly proportioned, and has the same they es: f are bordered with wide membranes like hoge of ek be oe cies known, é Phal. fulicarius, Bonap.; Tringa lobati ahd Tr. futcatin 3 (3) on has a very large beak for a member of this family.’ In winter } it is ash-coloured above; beneath, and’ the head, w hitish} "}.! black band on the neck: it is then the 77. lobata, ae 308. In summer it becomes black, streaked with fawn coléife above, arte = reddish beneath: there is at all times a white band on the wing nt which is blackish: it is then the Phalaropus rufus, Bechst. and %%, Ve 4 Sp. I; Briss. V, pl. xvii, fig. 1, quoted by Gmel. under Scol. calidris; the true Maubéche, Briss. V, pl. xx, fig. 1 (T'ringa calidris, Gm.): the bird of Frisch, pl.. 238, are all ruffs in different states of plumage, many other varieties of which might still be represented. According to Meyer, the T’ringa grenovicensis, Lath. is also a young Ruff. (1) A true Ruff was shot on Long Island a few weeks ago (May 1830). It is the only one ever found inthis country. Am. Ed. bh (2) Vieillot has changed this name into Crymorutre, Gal., pl. 270. Y, (3) Meyer improperly confounds this bird, Ed:v. 308, with the T'ringa hyper- borea and the T'ringa fusca, which have the beak of a Totanus, and of which we make our Lowires. / ade ahs . f ; 7 _GRALLATORIA. 391 ne _ Meyer; Zringa fulicaridy 1, Edw. 142;(1) Crymophile roux, Bit Gal... 270. ees bird i is rare in Europe. | oa ries “ ery haa ARS t et w APN " Sraepsmas. (2) , A as 1 he ris Mines stare rather low; the bill is short, and the toes are without membranes, like those of, the true Sandpipers; but this bill is conical, pointed, without any depression, compression, or in- flation, and the nasal, fosse do not extend to more than. half its length. The thumb barely reaches the ground. Their bill, which is stronger and stiffer in proportion than that of the preceding birds, enables them to overturn stones, beneath which they find worms. The mantle of one species is varied with black and red; head and belly, white; cheeks and breast, black; it is disseminated throughout both continents, and is the Zringa interpres, L., _ Enl. 856. There is also one varied with grey and brown, which is perhaps but the same species at a different age—Enl. 340 and 8575 Noell Gal. 287.(3) we, 7 é hs e » © © Toranus, Cuv.(4) a The beak of»these bit ds'is slender, round, pointed and solids the nasal fosse do not extend beyond the half of its length, and the supper mandible is slightly. arcuated near the end. Their form is light and their. legs long; but.a small part of their thumb rests on . the ground; their external web is well marked. Each of the species is fo found throughout almost the whole of the globe. \ Scol. glottis, L.; Chevalier aux pieds verts; Albin. I, 693 Al- difov. Orn. III, 535; Brit. Zool. pl. c. 1? As large asa Limosa, ' .' »beak thick and strong, a brown ash colour above and on the _ sides; edges of the feathers dotted with brown; white rump and a belly; tail marked with narrow and irregular grey and white . stripes; the feet green. In summer the neck and breast are spotted with brown; in winter the whole under part of the body is white. It is the largest of all the European species. Scol. fusca, L.3 Cheval noir; Barge brune; Buff. Enl. 8755 Frisch, 236,(5) has the graceful form of the Godwit, and in summer is a blackish brown above and slate-coloured beneath; the feathers. Na at MM | Suwa Caisg it Cia. Winnie ARR. tps gata ae Miata ste (1) Gmelin has increased the confusion by quoting this bird as a variety of the Gipietenel (2) Vieillot has changed this name into that of Arenanrra, Gal. pl. 237. . (3) See Edw., 141; Naum., Suppl. 62, f. 118; Wils. VI, lvii, 2. The Chevalier varié, Enl. 300, referred by Meyer to Strepsilas, is merely a Ruff. (4) Totano, the Venetian name of a Limosa or Totanus. (3) According to Meyer, the Scol. cwronica and cantabrigiensis, and the T'ringa atra, Gm. should be referred to this bird. The two first are the young ones. nie 4 392 ag bordered or dotted on the edge with whitish; 1; the ump white, and the tail striped with brown and white, t we charac era which exist more or less in all the species of Europe; | feet of ¢ a reddish brown. In winter the belly and breast. become white, when it is almost ash coloured above, with red feet. It is then the Grand Chevalier a pieds roges, Scol. calidris, L. Enl. 876.(1) Tringa gambetta, Gm. Gambette; Enl. 845; Frisch, 240, Naum. 9, f. 9. In summer, brown above, with black spots, and some few white ones, on the edges of the feathers; white be- neath with brown spots, particularly on the breast and neck; red feet; numerous brown and white stripes on the tail. In win- ter its spots are nearly effaced, and the mantle is of an almost uniform grey; in this state it is the fig.,. Eni. fe" gee size is a third less. Totanus stagnatilis, Bechst.; Chevillier 2 dongs piedss Bonelli. Something smaller than the preceding, but Ths longer and more slender legs: in summer its back is brown, with irregular black spots; its belly white, and brown spots mark the neck and breast. In winter the mantle becomes of a upiforgn ee nei and . the under part of the body white. The smipeey the tail are irregular and parallel to its edges. > > Tringa ochropus, L.; Le Béecasseau; Enl.. 848. A bronze-black, above, the edges of the feathers dotted with whitish; white. be- neath, spotted with grey on the forepart of the neck and on the | sides; only three black bands on the lower half of the tail; feet, greenish; still smaller than either of the two preceding ones. It is much esteemed as game, and is common along the banks of rivulets in Europe, although it is rather a solitary bird. Tringa glareola, Gm.; Bécasseau des bois, chiefly differs from the preceding in Ha from seven to eight blackish stripes | : along the whole length of the tail. The pale spots on its. back . are broader. The spots on the neck and breast almost totally disappear in winter. Tot. macularius, Wils. VII, lix, 1, 2?(2) Tringa hypoleucos, L.; La guignette, Enl. 850. The smallest of the European spe- cies, being about as large as a Pelidna (Zr. alpina, Gm.); a bronzed greenish-brown, with transverse, fawn coloured and black marks on the wings; beneath and in front, whites. rump, and the middle quills of the tail, colour of the back, the lateral ones only being striped with black and white as in the (1) Under the wrong name of Barge grise. (2) This mark of doubt may be removed: it is not the Tot. ache Wils. Am. Ed. f | GRALLATORI&. 393 other species. The feathers of the beak as well as the small wing-coverts, when young, have a light fawn coloured edging. Its habits are the same as those of the preceding. Among the species foreign to Europe, we should particularly notice that of North America, with the large beak and semi- palmated feet, Scolopax semipalmata, L.; Ency. Method. Pl. Ornith., pl. lxxi, fig. 1; Wils. VII, lvi, 3, which is nearly as large as the one first named, with .a shorter and thicker beak, plumage brown-grey above, whitish beneath; brownish spots on the neck and breast; toes well bordered with equal and consi- derable membranes.(1) The Losrrgs, Cuy.(2) We think requires to be separated from Phalaropus, because al- though the feet are similar, the bill is that of a Totanus; such is Tringa hyperborea, L.; Lobipede a hausse-col; Enl. 766, of which the 7ringa fusca, Edw. 46, is probably the female or the young. This little bird, which is grey above, white beneath, and has its scapulars tinged with red, has a broad red gorget round its white throat.(3) Himanropvus,(4) Briss. The bill round, slender and pointed, even more so than that of a (1) It is on this character that M. Ch. Bonaparte founds his subgenus Caror- Tropnorus. Addto the common species, Tot. speculiferus, which resembles the semipalmatus, but stands higher, and has a longer beak, with the usual feet;— Tot. vociferus, Wils. VII, lviii, 5, or Tot. melanoleucos, Ord, Ib.;—Tot. flavipes, Wils., LVI, 4;—Tot. solitarius (Tot. glareolus, Wils.), Wils., VII, lviii, 3. [See App. XXIV of Am. Ed.) The T'ot. Bartramius, Wils., VU, lix, 2, has a propor- tionally shorter beak than the other species, although in every thing else its characters are the same. N.B. This genus, mixed up by Buffon with several varieties of Ruffs, has been distributed by Linnzus, without any reason, among his two genera Scolopax and Tinga. This confusion is not yet dissipated, as I had no opportunity of observ- ing all the foreign species. Itis easy to see, however, that I could not retain the genus Arires of Illiger. ’ I should also observe, that the most»exact descriptions will not suffice for dis- © tinguishing the species with certainty, until those of my Toranus are separated _” from my Sandpipers and Godwits, according to the forms of the beak, as above “mentioned. Itis this which has prevented me from giving all the synonymes of Bechstein and Meyer. e's» (2)! M. Vieillot, to have the air of producing a change, retains here the name of Phalaropus. (3) Add the Phal. frenatus, Vieill. Gal. pl. 271, or Phal. liseré, T. Col. 270; Wils., IX, pl. lxiii, f. 3? Itis the subgenus Hotoronrus of Ch. Bonap. (4). Himantopus, feet like a string, (alluding to their weakness) is the name given to this bird in Pliny. Vou. I.—2 Z 394 AVES. Totanus, and the nasal grooves occupy but half its length. The ex- cessive length and tenuity of the legs which are reticulated and des- titute of a thumb, and the weakness of their bones, which is so ex- treme as to render walking painful to them, are what principally distinguish the species of this subgenus, and give rise to their name. One species only is known in Europe,—Charadrius himantopus, L., Enl. 878, which is white, with a black calotte and mantle, and long red feet; it is a rare bird whose habits are but im- perfectly known.(1) This is perhaps the only place for the , Recurvirostra, Lin. Or the Avosets, although their feet, which are webbed to near the ends of the toes, almost entitle them to a situation among the Pal- mipedes; but their high tarsi and half naked legs, their long, slen- der, pointed, smooth, and elastic bill, together with the mode of life resulting from this conformation, equally approximate them to the Snipes. What particularly characterizes, and even distinguishes them from all other birds, is the strong upward curve of their beak. Their legs are reticulated, and their thumb much too short to reach the ground. The European species,—Recurv. avocetia, L., Enl. 353, is white; a black calotte and three bands on the wing of the same hue; feet, lead-coloured; it is a pretty bird of a graceful form, found in winter on the sea shore. The American species,—R. americana, Wils. VII, Ixiii, 2; Leach, Zool. Misc., pl. 101, differs from it in a red hood. The coasts of the Indian seas produce a third which is white, with black wings.and red feet, the RP. orientalis, Cuy.(2) FAMILY V. q M a BORA PTL ag This family is furnished with very long toes, fitted for will ing on the grass of marshes, and even for swimming, in those, numerous species especially, in which they are bordered with | a membrane. ‘There are no membranes, however, between (1) Add, Him. nigricollis, Wils. VU, pl. lviii, 2, and Vieill. Gal. pl. 229. (2) Vicillot has changed this name into Recurvir. leucocephala, Gal. pl. 272. GRALLATORIE. 395 the bases of their toes, not even between the external ones. The beak, more or less compressed on the sides, is lengthened or shortened according to the genus, never, however, becom- ing as slender or as weak as that of the preceding family. The body of these birds is also singularly compressed, a cir- cumstance which is owing to the narrowness of the sternum ; their wings are moderate or short, and their flight feeble. They all have a long thumb. They have been divided into two tribes according to the armature or non-armature of their wings ; but this character is liable to exceptions. Jacanas, Briss.—Parra, Lin.(i) The Jacanas are greatly distinguished from the other Grallatoriz by having four very long toes, separated down to their root, the nails of which, that of the thumb in particular, are also extremely long and pointed, from which peculiarity, they have received their vulgar name of Surgeons. The beak is similar to that of the Lap- wings in its moderate length, and in the slight inflation of its end. Their wing isarmed with aspur. They are noisy and quarrelsome birds, which inhabit marshes of hot climates, where they walk with great facility by means of their long toes. America produces some species in which the base of the bill is covered by a flat, naked membrane, which extends to part of the forehead. P. jacana, L. Enl. 322. (The Common Jacana.) Blaek, with ared mantle; the primary wing-quills green; fleshy wattles under the beak; very sharp-pointed spurs. It is the most common species in all the hot climates of America.(2) Some of the same description are also found in Asia, » (A) Jacana, or Jahana, i is properly, in Brazil, the name of the Gallinulz.. The 7 ‘Surgeons are there called Aquapuazos, because they walk over the aquatic plants ealled Aquape (Azzar.). It is possibly through an error of transcription that one of'them in Marcgrave is named guapeccaca. Parra is the Latin name of some unknown bird. (2) The-J: varié (P. variabilis), En\. 846, is only the common species at an early age. ‘The P. brasiliensis and the P. nigra exist only on the somewhat equivocal - authority of, “Marcgrave. The P. viridis, which also rests on the description of Marcgrav e, appears to me, from the description itself, to be a Porphyrio. The P africana, Lath. scarcely differs. As for the P. chavaria, see the following article - on the Palamedez. 396 AVES. P. znea,(1) with a black body reflecting blue and violet tints; mantle bronze-green; rump and tail blood-red; anterior quills of the wing green; a white streak behind the eye. Its spurs are blunt and small. Others have been discovered in the East, in which this membrane is deficient, and which are otherwise remarkable for some singular differences in the proportions of their quills. P. chinensis; Jacana @ longue queue; Encycl. Method., Orn. pl. 61, f. 1; Vieill. Gal. 265. (The Long-tailed Jacana.) Brown; head, throat, front of the neck and coverts of the wings white; back of the neck furnished with silky feathers of a golden yel- low; asmall pediculated appendage to the end of some of the wing-quills; four quills of the tail black, and longer than the body. The Chirurgien de Lucon of Sonnerat, (P. luzoniensis, ) is the young of the same: independently of some difference in the colours, it has not yet acquired its long tail. The East produces others which are tufted, and in which the spur on the wing is deficient, P. gallinacea, Tem. 464. PALAMEDEA, Lin. The Kamichi resemble the Jacanas, but on a very large scale, in the two strong spurs of each of their wings, in their long toes and strong nails, that of the thumb in particular, which is long and straight as in the Larks; but their beak, whose aperture is small, is but slightly compressed, and is not inflated; the upper mandible, also, is somewhat arcuated. Their legs are reticulated. The species known, P. cornuta, L., Enl. 451; Vieill. Gal. 261; Anhima in Brazil; Camouche at Cayenne, &c. is larger than the Goose, blackish, with a red spot on the shoulder, and a singular appendage on top of the head, consisting of a long, slender, mobile and horny stem. There are no membranes between the toes. This bird is found in the inundated places of South America, and has a very loud cry. It is a strict monogamist. It has been said that it hunts reptiles, but though its stomach is but slightly musealiins it rarely feeds on any thing but aquatic plants and seeds.(2) A distinct genus has been made of another, Cuauna, Illig.(3) Parra chavaria, L.; Chaia of Paraguay, Azzar.; Col. 2195 (1) Vieillot has changed this specific name into melanchloris, Gal. 264. It is also the P. superciliosa, Horsf. Jav. (2) Bajon., Mem. sur Cayenne, II, 284. (3) Vieillot has changed this name into Or1srorornts. : GRALLATORIA. 397 Vieill. Gal. 267, which has no horn on the vertex, and whose occiput is ornamented with a circle of erectile feathers. The head and upper part of the neck are only covered with down, and it has a black collar. The rest of its plumage is lead-co- loured, and blackish with a white spot on the tip of the wing, and a second over the base of some of the large quills. The ex- ternal toes are considerably palmated. It chiefly feeds on aquatic plants, and the Indians of Carthagena always keep some of them among their geese and chickens, as it is sufficiently courageous, according to them, to repulse even the Vulture. A singular circumstance attending this bird is, that air is every where in- terposed between the skin and muscles, even on the legs, in such a quantity as causes it to crackle under the finger. Although there is scarcely any part of the leg naked in(1) Meearopius, We still think it should be placed near Palamedea. It is a genus lately discovered in New Guinea, in which the bill is arched and slightly compressed, the membranous nostrils occupying about the one half; the legs are strong, high, and scutellated; the thumb and toes long, and terminated by large nails somewhat flattened; the tail is short, the circumference of the eye partly naked, and there is a small tubercle on the carpus, the first and slight vestige of the spur of the Palamedex. The membrane between the external toesis very short; between the internal ones it is somewhat larger. The eggs are very disproportionate in size to that of the bird. One species is tufted almost like the Chavaria,—the Megap. Duperrey, Less. and Garn., Voy. de Duperr. Zool., pl. 37. Two others, the MW. de Freycinet and M. de Lapeyrouse, Quoy and Gaym. Voy. de Freycin. pl. 28 and 27, and Col. 220, are destitute of the tuft.(2) A fourth, which is smaller, the lectelie de Dur- ville, Voy. de Dup., pl. 38, appears to have no tail. Of the tribe whose wings have no armature, Linneus com- prises in his genus /ulica such as have their beak prolonged ~ into a sort of shield, which partly covers the forehead; and in his genus Radius, those in which this peculiarity does not exist. [See App. XXV of Am. Ed. ] (1) There is scarcely any part of the leg naked in the Rallus Crez. (2) The Mégap. Duperrey is called Tavon in Manilla. Although hardly as large asa Partridge, it lays an egg equal in size to that of a Goose. Add the Mégap. a2 pieds rouges, Col. 411. 398° AVES. me Rauuus, Linn. The Rails, which, in other respects, have a strong, mutual re- semblance, present bills of very different proportions. Among the species in which it is longest, the Rattus, Bechst., is placed Ral. aquaticus, L.; Rale d’eau d’ Europe, Enl. 749; Naum. 20, f.41. (The Water Rail.) A fawn coloured brown, spotted with blackish above; bluish ash colour beneath; the flanks striped with white and black; common in ponds, &c., where it swims well, and runs lightly over the leaves of aquatic plants; it feeds on small shrimps, and its flesh has a marshy odour.(1) Other species have a shorter beak, Crex, Bechsty; among which we find Ral. crex, L.; Le Rale de genéts, Enl. 7503 Frisch, 212, B; Naum. 5, f. 5. Fawn coloured brown, spotted with black above; greyish beneath; flanks streaked with black; red wings. It lives ‘and builds in the fields, running through the grass with great celerity. Its name, Crex, expresses the sound of its note. It has been called the Quail-King, because it arrives and departs with those birds, and leads a solitary life on the same grounds, from which arose the conjecture that it was their leader. It feeds on grain, as well as on worms and insects. . Ral. porzana,L.; La Marouette, Enl. 7513 Frisch, 211; Naum. 31, f. 42. (The Little Spotted Rail.) A deep brown dotted with white; flanks marked with whitish stripes; found in the vicinity of ponds, and constructs a nest with reeds, that has the form of a wherry, which it fastens to the stem of some one of those plants; it is a good swimmer and diver, and does not leave France till the middle of winter.(2) (1) There is a variety or species at the Cape, Mallus cxrulescens, Cuv., the black and white stripes of whose abdomen are merely a little more extended. Add ofthe Water Rails: Lal. virginianus, Edw., 729; Wils. LXII, 1;—crepitans, Ib. 2;— P longirostris, Enl. 849;—variegatus, Enl. 77 5;—philippensis, Enl. 774;—torquatus;— striatus;—the Fulica cayennensis (which is a true Rail), Enl. 352, as well as the. Gallinula gigas, Spix, xcix;—sarracura, Id. XCVIIN;—mangle, Id. ‘XCVI—rufi ceps, Id. XCVI, and cxria, Id. XCV.—The Ral. fuscus, Enl. ane begins to have : a shorter bill. * (2) There are two other Rails in murope with short ‘oe smaller than the porzana, R. Bailliont, Vieill. Dict., and &. pusillus, Naum., 32, F. 43. Amon these short beaked Rails may be placed the Ral. cayennensis, Enl. 753 and 368;— minutus, Enl. 847;—jamaicensis, Edw. 278;—noveboracensis, Vieill. Gal. 266;— nigro- lateralis; Lichten.;—carolinus, Edw. 144, Wils. 48, 2; s—Galhinula. _eurizona, T. Col. 417;—G. rubiginosa, 1d. Col. 387. The Ral. benghalensis, Gm., isa Ethynchea. 4 % GRALLATORIA, 399 Fuuica, Lin. The Coots may be divided as follows, from the form of the beak and the appliances of the feet. . . Gauinuta, Briss. and Lath. Or the Water Hens. The beak very similar to that of the Ground- Rail, from which these birds are distinguished, by the shield on the forehead, and by very long toes, furnished with a very narrow border. Fulica chloropus, L.; La Poule d’Eau commune, Enl. 877; Frisch, 209; Naum. 29 and 38. (The Water-Hen.) A deep brown above; slate-grey beneath, with some white on the thighs, along the middle of the lower part of the abdomen, and on the external edge of the wing. The young, Fulica fusca, Gm., Pou- lette. d’eau, Buff., are more lightly coloured, and have a larger frontal escutcheon.(1) Porruyrio, Briss. The beak higher in proportion to its length; very long toes, with- out any very sensible border; the frontal shield large, rounded in some, and square above in others. These birds stand on one foot, using the other to convey their food to the beak. Their colours are usually fine shades of blue, violet and aqua-marina. Such is Fulica porphyrio, .; Poule Sultane Ordinaire; Edw. 87, a beautiful African bird, now naturalized in several islands and coasts of the Mediterranean.(2) Its beauty would render it an ornament to our pleasure grounds. Furica, Briss. The True Coots, in addition to a short beak and a large frontal shield, have their toes much widened by a festooned. border that renders them excellent swimmers, in consequence of which their (1) The Poule d’eau ardoisée de l Inde, Vicill. Gal. 268, hardly differs from the common one;—the P. d’eaw tachetée, or the Grinette, F. nexvia, Alb., U, 73, is only a young Ral. crex. Add Ral. phenicurus, Enl. 896. Add Gal. martinica, Gm.; Wils. IX, pl. xxiii, f. 2. Am. Ed. (2) The Ful. maculaia, flavipes and fistulans, originally rest on some bad figures of Gesner, from drawings which had been sent to him. But the Ful. mar- tinica and flavirostris are true Rhyncheas. The martinica is in Vicill. Gal. 267. Add the Tuléve d manteau verd (Porph. smaragnotus, T.), Enl. 910;—the J. d man- teau noir (Porph. melanotos, T.);—the T. meunier (P. pulverulentus, T.), Col. 405;—the 7. emeraudine (P. smaragdinus, T.) Col, 421;—the P. albus, L. Philip., Voy. to Bot. Bay, p. 273; J. White, p. 238 400 AVES. lives are passed in ponds and marshes. Their polished plumage is not less adapted to this kind of life than their conformation, and these birds establish an evident link between the order of the Gral- latoriz and that of the Palmipedes. There is but one in Europe, F. atra, F. aterrima, and F. xthiops, Gm.; La Foulque, Enl. 197, Frisch. 208, Naum. 30, f. 40. (TheCoot.) The shield of a deep slate colour; edge of the wings whitish; in the nuptial season the shield becomes red: found wherever there is a pond.(1) We will terminate this sketch of the Grallatorie with three genera, which it is diflicult to associate with any other, and which may be considered as forming separately so many small families. Curonis, Foster.—VAcGinALIs, Lath. Or the Sheath-Bills. Their legs are short, almost like those of the Gallinacez; their tarsi scutellated, their bill stout and conical, hav- ingahard substance enveloping its base, which, it appears, the bird has the power of raising and depressing. Only one species is known, and that is from New Holland, Vag. Chionis, Lath. III, pl. 89, Chionis necrophaga, Vieill. Gal. 258. Itis the size of a Partridge, with entirely white plumage. It haunts the sea-coast, where it feeds on the dead animals thrown up by the waves. GLAREOLA. The beak of the Pratincoles is short, conical, arcuated throughout, has a large opening, and resembles that of the Gallinacee, Their excessively long and pointed wings remind us of the Swallows,(2) or of the Palmipedes of the high seas; their legs are of a moderate length, their tarsi scutellated, and their external toes somewhat pal-: mated; their thumb touches the ground. Aquatic worms and insects constitute their food. The European species, Glar. austriaca, Enl. 882; Glar. pratincola, Leach,’ Lin. Trans., XIII, pl. xii; Naum., 29, F. 59, is brown above, white beneath and on the rump; a black circle round the throat; feet and base of the beak, reddish. It appears to be found in all the | north of the eastern continent. (3) (1) Add the Coot of Madagascar (Ful. cristata, Gm.) Enl.797; Vieill. Gal. 269. Add also F’. americana, Gm.; Wils. IX, pl. Ixxiii, f. 1. 4m. Ed. (2) Linnzus (Edit. XII) even placed the common epPgiEs in the genus Hirundo, - under the name of Hir. pratincola. (3) Glareola nevia, Gm., is the young of the common species. See Leach, Lin. GRALLATORIA. A401 Our last genus will be that of Puenicoprerus, Lin. Or the Flamingos, one of the most extraordinary and insulated of all birds. The legs are excessively long; the three anterior toes’are palmated to their ends, and that of the hind one is extremely short; the neck, quite as long and slender as the legs, and their small head furnished with a beak whose lower mandible is an oval longitudinally bent into a semi-cylindrical canal, while the upper one, oblong and flat, is bent crosswise in its middle, so as to join the other exactly. The membranous fossex of the nostrils occupy nearly all the side of the part which is behind the transverse fold, and the nostrils themselves are longitudinal slits in the base of the fossex. The edges of the two mandibles are furnished with small, and very delicate transverse laminz, which, with the fleshy thickness of the tongue, creates some affinity between them and the Ducks. Were it not for the length of their tarsi, and the nudity of their legs, we might even place them among the Palmipedes. They feed on shell fish, insects, and the spawn of fishes, which they capture by means of their long neck, turning the head on one side to give more effect to the hook of the upper mandible. They construct their nest of earth in marshes, placing themselves astride of it to hatch their eggs, a position to which they are forced to resort, by the length of their legs. The species known, Ph. ruber, Enl. 68 (The Red Flamingo), is from three to four feet in height; ash coloured, with brown streaks, during the first year; in the second there is a rosy hue on the wings, and in the third it acquires a permanent purple-red on the back, and rose-coloured wings. The quills of the wing are black; the beak yellow, with a black tip, and the feet brown. This species is found in all parts of the eastern continent be- low 40°. Numerous flocks are seen on the southern coast of France, and they sometimes ascend as far as the Rhine. M. Temminck thinks that the American Flamingo, which is alto- gether of a bright red, Wils. VIII, 66, and Catesb. 73, is a different species from that of Europe.(1) Trans. XIII, pl. xii, f. 2. Add Glar. australis, Leach, loc. cit. pl. xiv, or Glar. isabella, Vieill. Gal. 263;—Glar. orientalis, Leach, XI1;—Glar. lactea, Tem. Col. 399. (1) M. Temminck has positively ascertained that the Flamingo of America is different from that of Europe. The latter he calls Phen. antiquorum, but the American species Ph. ruber. Am. Ed. Vou. I.—3 A 402 AVES. ORDER VI. PALMIPEDES. These birds are characterized by their feet, formed for natation, that is to say, placed far back on the body, attached to short and compressed tarsi, and with palmated toes. Their dense and polished plumage saturated with oil, and the thickly set down which is next to their skin, protect them from the water in which they live. ‘They are the only birds whose beak surpasses—which it sometimes does to a considerable ex- tent—the length of their feet, and this is so, to enable them to search for their food in the depths below, while they swim on the surface. Their sternum is very long, affording a com- plete guard to the greater part of their viscera, having, on each side, but one emargination or oval foramen, filled up with membrane. Their gizzard is usually muscular, the ceca long, and the inferior larynx simple; in one family, however, the latter is so inflated as to form cartilaginous capsules. This order admits of a tolerably precise division into four families. FAMILY I. BRACHYPTERZ. A part of this family has some external affinities with that of the Gallinule. ‘Their legs, placed further back than in any other birds, renders walking painful to them, and obliges them, when on land, to stand vertically. In addition to this, as most of them have but feeble powers of flight, and as some of them are wholly deprived of that faculty, we may consider them as exclusively attached to the surface of the water: their plumage is extremely dense, and its surface frequently polished, presenting a silvery lustre. ‘They swim under wa- ter, using their wings with almost as much effect as though they were fins. Their gizzard is muscular, and their ceca PALMIPEDES. 403 moderate; the lower larynx is furnished on each side with a peculiar muscle. Co.tymsus, Lin.{1) The only particular character of the Divers is a smooth, straight, compressed and pointed bill, and linear nostrils; but the differences in the feet have caused them to be subdivided. 5 Popicers, Lath.—Cotyrmsus, Briss. and Illig. The toes of the Grebes, instead of being palmated, are widened like those of the Coots, the anterior ones only being united at base by membranes. ‘The middle nail is flattened, and the tarsus strongly compressed. The semi-metallic lustre of their plumage has caused it to be occasionally employed as fur. Their tibia, as well as that of the succeeding subgenera, is prolonged above into a point which gives a more efficient insertion to the extensors of the leg. These birds live on lakes, &c., and build among the rushes. In certain circumstances, it appears that they carry their young ones. under their wings. Their size and plumage are so much changed vy age, as to have caused an improper multiplication of species. ”M. Meyer reduces those of Europe to four. Col. cristatus, Gm., Enl. 400 and 944; Frisch, 183; Naum. 69, F. 1063 Col. urinator, Gm., Enl. 941; Edw. 36 (The Crested Grebe), is the size of a ducks blackish-brown above, silver-white beneath; a white band on the wing; it acquires with age a double black tuft, and the adults have in addition a broad red collarette on the upper part of the neck, edged with black. “Col. cornutus, Enl. 404, 2; Col. obscurus, Enl. 942; and Col. caspicus, Gm., Vieill. Gal. 281; Edw. 145 (The Horned Grebe), resembles the preceding in form, but the collarette of the adult is black; its tufts and the front of its neck red. It is much smaller. Col. subcristatus; and the young, parotis and rubricollis, Enl. 931; Lath. Supp. I, 118; Naum. 70, f. 107 (The Grey-cheeked Grebe), also has the front of its neck red, but the tufts of the adult are small and black, and its collarette very short and grey. Intermediate, as to size, between the two last. Col. minor, Gm. Enl. 905 (The Little Grebe), is as large as a Quail, and has neither crest nor collarette; its plumage is brown; more or less shaded with red, the breast and belly ex- cepted, where itis asilver-grey. The throat of the young bird is white. (2) (1) Colymbus, the Greek name of these birds. (2) Add the Pod. carolinensis, Lath., Catesb. 41, 91, Enl. 95;—the Gr. aux 404 AVES, < Ww ph HELIoRNIS, Bogmat. ~ Popo, Liki ge GitcnrebuLaons, Buff. 5 The feet lobulate as in the Coots and Grebes, but the tail more developed than in either of the two; the nails also are sharper.(1) [See App. XXVI of Am. Ed. | .. 7 % Mercvs, Briss.(2)—Cotymsus, Lath.—Eupyres, Illig. The true Divers have the feet of ordinaty»Palmipedes, alon with all the forms of the Grebes, that is, the anterior toesare nil to their ends by membranes, and are terminated by point adits They are northern birds, which rarely breed in Fr nc where they _ arrive in winter, at which season is occasionally sen onthecas Col. glacialis, L., Eni. 9523; Col. immer, Gm., Wils. Am. IX, Ixxiv, 3; Naum. 66, f. 103. (The Great Norther ae) The adult is two feet six inches in length, its head and neck black, changing to a green with a whitish collar; back, a black- ish brown dotted with whitish; white beneath; the lower man- dible, which has a slight curve upwards, is marked by a groove beneath. The young birds, Col. immer, Gm., Briss., VI, which more frequently visit the fresh waters, differ considerably as to the extent of the black on the neck, and of the grey or brown on the back, which, added to their diminished size, has - occasioned a multiplication of the number of species. We ‘ tinguish ‘ Col. arcticus, L., Edw. 146; Naum. Supp. 30, f. 603 and fe young, Enl. 914 (The Black-throated Diver), which is some- what smaller; the back of the neck ash-coloured, and the lower mandible straight and without a groove. The young resemble those of the preceding. Col. septentrionalis, Enl. 308; Edw. 97; Naum. 67, f. 943 Vieill. Gal. 282; Col. stellatus, Gm.; Buff. VIII, xxi; Enl. 992, Naum. Supp. 31, f. 62. (The Red-throated Diver.) The adult male is brown above, white beneath; face and sides of the neck ash-co- loured; front of the neck red. The female and the young are brown dotted with white above, and all white beneath. belles joues (Pod. kalipareus, Less. and Garn.), Voy. de la Coq., Zool. No. 45;—the Gr. Rolland (Pod. Rollandi), Quoy and Gaym., Voy. de Freycin., Zool., pl. xxxvi. (1) Plotus surinamensis, Gmel., Enl. 893;—Heliornis senegalensis, Vieill. Gal. 280. M. Ch. Bonap. as well as inci: thinks that this genus should be approx- imated to that of Anhinga. (2) Mergus (diver), the Latin name of some sea-bird difficult to determine. Lin- nzus, following Gesner, has applied it to the Merganser. Eudytes, a Greek word composed by Illiger, has the same meaning. PALMIPEDES, 405 Uria, Briss. et Illig.(1) The Guillemots have a bill, which, though of the general form of the preceding, is covered with feathers down to the nostrils; there is also an emargination at the point which is somewhat arcuated. Their chief character, however, consists in the absence of the thumb. Their wings, much shorter than those of the divers, scarcely enable them to flutter. They feed on fish, crabs, &c. and are found among rocky precipices when they breed. The large species called the Great Guillemot, Colymbus troile, L., Enl. 903; Brit. Zool., pl. H; Edw. 359, 13; Frisch, 185, is the size of a Duck, the head and neck brown, back and wings blackish, and a white belly; there is a white line upon the wing formed by the tips of the secondary quills. It inhabits the ex- _ treme North, although it breeds on the rocky coasts of England and Scotland. In very hard winters it is seen on those of France. o There is a smaller species which is black, with the upper part of the wing white, Col. Grylie, L.; Vieill. Gal. 2943 Choris., Voy. aut. du M., Isles Aleut., pl. xxii, sometimes mottled throughout with white, C. marmoratus, Frisch, Suppl. B., pl. 185, Edw. 50 and Penn., Arct. Zool., II, xxii, 2. Individuals “are sometimes seen, all white, C. lacteolus, Pall.(2) We may also separate from the Guillemots the Pia oy Crpuus,(3) Vulgarly called Greenland Divers, which have a shorter bill with a more arcuated back, but without any emargination. The symphysis of the lower mandible is extremely short. Their wings are larger, and the membranes of their feet well indented. The species most known, called the Little Guillemot or Green- land Dove, Colymbus minor, Gm.; Enl. 917; Mergulus Alle, Vieill. Gal. 295; Brit. Zool. pl. H, 4, f. 1; Edw. 91; Naum. Ed. I, 65, f. 102, is the size of a large Pigeon, black above, - (1) Uria, the Greek, or rather Latin name of an aquatic bird which appears to have been either a Diver ora Grebe. Guillemot, the English name, would seem to indicate its stupidity. (2) Add the G. a grosbec {Uria Prunnichii, Sabine), Choris, Voy. aut. du M. pl. xxi;—Uria lacrymans, Lapil., Ib., XX11J—consult the article inserted there on this genus by M. Valenciennes. (3) Cephus, the name of some sea bird often mentioned by the Greek writers, which appears to have been a species of Petrel or Gull. Mehring, and subse- quently Pallas, applied it to the Divers and Guillemots. Vicillot has changed it into Mergulus, Gal. 295. 406 Aves. white beneath, with a white’ line on the wing as in the Guille- mot. Its bill is black, and feet red. Inhabits all the northern coasts, and builds under ground. It is sometimes seen on the French coast in winters ‘_ yt ke. 4 7 at F ALCA, Lin. <—" : : ee iv *, B i 39 r The Auks are known by the very much compressed, vertically raised bill which has a trenchant back, cand is usually grooved — transversely; and by the feet which are cpopletaippinated, and have no thumb like those of the Guillemot. All these birds inhabit 4 4 the northern seas. We may divide the genus into two subgenera. ‘ 7 e t Frarercura, Briss.—Morwon, Illig. | . a 6 Or the Puffins, whose bill, shorter than the heady 1 is as high, and higher at base than it is long, which gives it a very extrao dinary form; a folded skin usually covers its base. The nostrils pl ced near for a moment; they live upon the ocean and breed on the rocks £ the edge are mere slits. Their small wings cangjust sustain ae The most common species, -Z/ca arctica, L. and labradoria, Gm.; Mormon fratercula, Tem. Enl. 275; Brit. Zoo pl. H; Edw. 358, 1; Frisch, 192; Naum. 65, f. 101, is the size of a Pr geon, and has a black calotte and mantle; white beneath. It sometimes breeds among the cliffs on the English coast, and is very common on those of France during the winter.(1) e M. Temminck distinguishes, under the name of Stariques (Pua- LERIS) those species which have a less elevated bill.(2) - ” 6 Auca, Cuv.(3) Ww “A The true Auks have a more elongated bill, resembling in form the blade of a knife; it is covered with feathers as far as the nos- trils. Their wings are decidedly too small to support them, and therefore they never attempt to fly. Alca torda and pica, Gm.; Pingouin commun, Enl. 1004, the adult 1003, in summer plumage, Edw. 358, 2, Briss. VI, VIII, 2, Brit. Zool. pl. H, 1. (The Common Auk.) Black above, white (1) Add .2. cirrhata, Pall. Spic., V, pl. 1; Vieill. Gal. 299. (2) Alca cristatella, Vieill. Gal. 297, or Starique cristatelle, T. Col. 200, and Pall., Spic. Zool., V, pl. 1, of which 2. pygmza is the young;—.2. psittacula, Pall. Spic., V, pl. 2, of which 2. tetracula, Ib. pl. 4, isthe young. (3) Alea, Aik, Auk, the name of these birds in the Feroe Islands, and in the north of Scotland. That of Penguin, first given to the Aptenodytes of the south by the Dutch, indicates the oily nature of their fat. See Clusius, Exot., 101. It was # Buffon who transferred this name exclusively to the northern Auks. age PALMIPEDES. 407 beneath; a white line on the wing and one or two on the bill. The throat of the male is black, and there is a white line reach- ing from the eye to the bill. Its size is that of a duck. Alca impennis, L.; Le Grand Pingouin, Buff. 1X, xxix; Enl. 367. (The Great Auk.) Nearly as large as a Goose, the colours very similar to those of the preceding species; but the bill is entirely black and marked with eight or ten grooves, and there is a white oval spot between the bill and the eye: its wings are shorter in proportion than those of any other species of this genus. It is said to lay but one large egg, spotted with purple. t . | APTENODYTES, Forst. The Penguins are even less capable of flying than the Auks. Their little wings are covered with mere vestiges of feathers, which at the first glance resemble scales; their feet, placed farther behind than those of any other bird, only support them by bearing on the tarsus, » which is widened like the sole of the foot of a quadruped, and in which are found three bones soldered together at their extremities. | They have a small thumb directed inwards, and their three anterior toes are united by an entire membrane. They are only found in the Antarctic Seas, never going on shore except to breed. They can only reach their nests by drawing themselves along on their bellies. The difference in their bill authorizes their division into three subgenera. APpTENoDYTES, Cuv. A long, slender, and pointed bill; the upper mandible a little arcuated near the end; covered with feathers to one-third of its length where the nostril is placed, from which a groove extends to the point. Apt. patagonica, Gm.; Le Grand Manchot, Enl. 975. (The Great Penguin.) Is the size of a Goose, slate-coloured above, white beneath; a black mask surrounded with a lemon-coloured cravatte. Found in large troops near the straits of Magellan, and as far as New Guinea. The flesh, though black, is eatable. i CaTaRRHACTES, Briss. The Gorfus(1) have the bill stout, but little compressed, pointed, rounded on the back, and its point somewhat arcuated; the groove (1) Gorfu, a corruption of goir fugel, the name of the Great Auk in the Feroe Islands. See Clusius, Exot., 367. Catarrhactes is the Greek name of a very dif- ferent bird, which could fly well, and precipitated itself from a height on its prey. It was most probably a species of Gull. > 408 AVES. which arises from the nostril terminates Piauslg on the inferior third of its edge. Apt. chrysocoma, Gm.; Le Gorfou sauteur, Enl. 9845 Vieill. Gal. 298. (The Snsrigiisis Gorfu.) As large as a_ stout Duck, black above, white beneath, and has a white or yellow tuft on each side of its occiput. Found in the vicinity of the Falkland Islands and of New Holland. It sometimes leaps out of the water while swimming, and lays its eggs in a hole on the shore.(1) cal SpHEniscus, Briss.(2) A compressed and straight bill, irregularly furrowed at bases; end of the upper mandible hooked, that of the lower one truncated; the nostrils exposed and placed in the middle. ? Apt. demersa, Gm.; Sphénisque du Cap, Enl. 382, and 1005. Black above, white hepaaths the bill brown with a white band on the middle; the male has a white eye-brow, black throat and_ a black line on the breast, which continues along each flank. Found near the cape where it breeds among the rocks.(3) FAMILY I. LONGIPENNES. This family includes those birds of the high seas, which from their immense strength of wing are to be met with in every latitude. They are known by the freedom or nullity of the thumb, by their very long. wings, and by their bill which is not notched but hooked at the point in the first ge- nera, and simply pointed in the others. Their inferior larynx has but one peculiar muscle on each side, their gizzard is mus- cular and their ceca short. | ProceLuaRria, Lin. The Petrels have a bill hooked at the end, the extremity of which (1) Add Apt. catarrhactes, Edw., 49;—A. papua, Sonner. Voy. I, pl. 115, and Vieill. Gal. 299;—.4. minor, Lath. Syn. II, pl. 103. (2) Spheniscus, a name given by Meehring to the Oidemia, and by Brissonto the Penguins; from =¢oxv (wedge). (3) Aptenod. torquata, Sonner. Voy. I, 114, appears to be the feticand of the ae demersa. a PALMIPEDES. 409 seems to consist of a distinct piece articulated with the remainder. Their nostrils are united and form a tube laid on the back of the upper mandible; there is a nail planted in the heel, but no thumb. Of all'the Palmipedes, these remain most constantly at a distance from land, and when a tempest supervenes, they are forced to seek shelter on reefs and ships, from which circumstance they derive their name of Storm Birds: that of Petrel—Little Peter—has been given to them on account of their habit of walking on the water, ‘which they effect by the aid of their wings. They make their nests “in holes of rocks, and eject on those who. attack them an oily fluid with which their stomach seems to be always filled. The greater number inhabit the Antarctic Seas. ’ Those species are more particularly called Perrets—Procet- ~ LARIA—whose lower mandible is truncated. ¢ “Proc. gigantea, Gm. ; Petrel géant; Quebranta huessos; Lath. Syn. III, pl. 100 (The Giant Petrel), is only found in the South Seas. It is the largest of all the species, surpassing the Goose in size. Its plumage is blackish, though there are some varieties in which it is more or less white. Proc. capensis; Petreldu Cap, &c. Enl. 964 (The Cape Petrel), is the size of a small Duck, white above, spotted black and white beneath. It is found in the same seas as the preceding species, and is frequently spoken of by navigators.(1) _ . Proc. glacialis; Fulmar; Petrel de Saint-Kilda, Eul. 593 Brit. Zool. pl. M,f.1. (The Fulmar.) White, with an ash-coloured mantle; bill and feet yellow; size of a stout duck. It breeds among the cliffs on the coasts of the British islands, and of the whole north.(2) ¢ Certain small species, with a somewhat shorter bill and rather longer legs and black plumage, the THALASSIDROMA, Vigors, are particularly designated by sailors under the name of Storm Birds.(3)_ The most common, Proc. pelagica, Briss. VI, xiil, 1; Wils. VII, lix, 6; Edw., 90, is scarcely larger than a Lark; stands high; all brown except the rump which is white, and a white _ line on the end of the great wing-coverts. When it seeks shel- ty (1) Better known to mariners as the Cape Pigeon. Am. Ed. (2) Add the Pétrel hartie, Temm., Col. 416;—the Petrel bérard, Freycinet, 37 ;— _ Proc. cinerea, Lath.;—Proc. desolata, 1d.;—Proe. turtur, Forst. (3) The “Mother Carey’s Chickens” of the English and American seamen. Am. Ed. Vou. L.—3 B 410 AVES. ter on a vessel, it may be considered ‘as the forerunner of a hurricane.(1) We separate, with Brisson, under the name of PuFFINUS, t Or Puffins, those in which the end of the lower ngage curved downwards along with that of the upper one, and i in which the nostrils, although tubular, do not open by one common orifice, but by two distinct holes. Their bill also is proportionally longer. Proc. puffinus, Gm.; Puffin cendré, Enl. 962. Cinereous above; whitish beneath; wings and tail blackish: the young is darker. Its size is that of a Crow. Very common in almost. every sea.(2) ° uf There is a species, long cauifauoae’ with the preceding one, which is not larger than a Woodcock, and which breeds in im+ mense numbers on thenorthern coasts of Scotland and the neigh- bouring islands, whose inhabitants salt them for their winter provision. It is black above and white underneath, the Procel- laria Anglorum, Tem. Edw., 359. 7 Navigators occasionally speak of some birds of the Antarctic seas — by the name of Petrels, which a constitute two separate genera. They are the . PreLecanorvEs, Lacep.—Hatoproma, Illig., *. Which have the bill and figure of the Petrels, with a dilatable throat like that of the Cormorant, and are without the vestige of a thumb like the Albatross. Such is Procellaria urinatriz, Gm. PacuyrTiLa, Illig. { Or the Prions, Lacep., which, similar in other respects to the Petrels, have separate nostrils like a Puffin, the bill widened at ~ base, and its edges furnished internally with very delicate, vertical and pointed laminz, analogous to those of Ducks. Such are the Blue Petrels, Proc. vittata and czrulea, Forst. (1) The fig. Enl. 933 is a closely allied species of the South Seas (Proc. ocean- ica, Forst.)—Add Proc. Leachii, Tem. Act. de phil., VI, pl. 9, f. 1;—Proc. Wil- sonii, Ch. Bonap.; Wils. VII, lxx, 6, Id. Act. de phil. VI, pl. 9, f. 2;— Proc, fre gatta, Lath., Rochef., Antill., p. 1525 ;—Proc. marina, Vieill. Gal. 292. : (2) Add Proc. obscura, Vieill. Gal. 301;—and Proc. pacifica, or uliginosa, White, 252, which perhaps does not differ from the Proc. xquinoctialis, Edw., 89. — PALMIFEDES. A411 DriomEDEA, Lin.(1) _, The Albatross is the most massive of all aquatic birds. The large, strong and trenchant bill is marked with sutures, and is terminated by a stout hook, which seems to be articulated with it. The nostrils _ *vesemble short rolls laid on the sides ofthe beak; there is no thumb, noteven the small nail that is observed in the Petrels. They inhabit the South seas, and feed on Mollusca, &c. D. exulans, L., Enl. 2373 Vicill. Gal. 293, is the species best known to navigators, who, on account of its size, white plumage, _. sand black wings, and because it is particularly common beyond ~ the tropic of Capricorn, have called it The Cape Sheep. The English also style it the Mun of War Bird,’&c. It is the great enemy of the Flying-fish. It constructs a high nest of earth, and lays a number of eggs, which are considered good food. . The cry of this bird is said to be as powerful as that of the Ass.(2) ; Various Albatrosses, more or less brown or blackish, have been observed; but whether they form varieties of the exulans, or are distinct species, has not yet been ascertained.(3) a 4) . _ Larus, Lin.(4) ‘The Gulls have a compressed, elongated, pointed bill, the superior mandible arcuated near the end, and the inferior forming a salient angle beneath. The nostrils, placed near its middle, are long, nar- row, and bored quite through; their tail is full, their legs tolerably long, and their thumb short. They are cowardly and voracious (1) Diomedea, the ancient’name of certain birds of the Island of Diomedes, near Tarentum, which were said to receive the Greeks favourably, and to attack the barbarians. As to the word Albatross, I find that the early Portuguese navigators called the Boobies and other oceanic birds Alcatros, or Alcatrass. Dampier applied — this name to the present genus, Grew changed it into 2bitross, and Edwards into Albatross. (2) The cry of the Albatross has been quite as much exaggerated as its size. I have repeatedly heard it when within a hundred yards of the bird, and from various individuals, some of large size, and consequently adults—it is a piping kind of . clang, deeper than that of a Goose, but something like it. dm. Ed. (3) Such is the Diom. spadicea—Add D. brachyura, Tem. Enl. 963;—D. melano- phris, T. Col. 456;—D. chlororhynchos, Lath. V, pl. xciv, Col. 468;—D. fuliginosa, Col. 469. ' on (4) Larus, the Greek name of these birds, Gavia in latin, whence Gabian in Provence; they are called Mauves, or Mouettes, in French, from their German name Maeve. 412 AVES.: . , ° birds, which swarm along the sea coasts, feeding on fish, the-flesh of dead bodies, &c. ‘They breed in the sand, or in clefts of rock, laying but few eggs. When they fly into the country, bad weather may be expected. Several species are found on the coast of France,” © and, as their plumage is greatly changed by age, the number has been still more increased. When young, they are usually spotted A with grey. Buffon calls x Fhe Gorranps,1) ' The large species whose size exceeds that of a Duck. One of the | largest is, , i . a Lar. marinus and nzevius, Gm.; Goéland a manteau noir, Bil,» . 990 and 266 (The Great Black-backed Gull), which, at first, » spotted with white and grey, afterwards becomes all white, with | a black mantle; the beak is yellow, with a red spot underneath; feet, reddish. 2 ~. Lar. glaucus, Gm.; Burgomestre; Naum. Ed. I, 36, is nearly as large, and only differs from it in the mantle, which is a light | ash colour. Its young also are spotted.(2) The ~ Mavves or Movetres > Are the smallest species. ; Lar. fuscus, L.; Lar. flavipes, Meyer, Frisch, 2183 Naum, * Ed. I, f. 51, B. (The Silver Gull.) Is all white; the mantle excepted, which is black; the feet are yellow. : Lar. eburneus, Gm.; Mouette blanche, Enl. 994. (The Ivory ° Gull.) All white, with black feet. From Spitzberg and Green- land: sometimes wanders into Europe. Lar. cyanorhynchus, Meyer; Mouette a pieds bleus, Enl. 977, Briss. VI, xvi, 2.. (The Common Gull.)» When old, of a beguiti-2a ful white, with a light ash coloured mantle; the primary quills of the wing partly black, with white spots at their tips, the feet and bill, lead coloured. Feeds on shell fish. | Lar. ridibundus, L.; L. hybernus, and L. erythropus, Gm.; La- M. a pieds rouges, Enl. 969 and 970; Briss. VI, xvii, 1. Is very “~ similar to the preceding, except that when young the tip of the tail is black, and that there are some black and brown on the wing: in spring the head of the adult becomes brown, and re- © (1) Gotland, a corruption of Gull, Gull-ent. : ere. (2) M. Temminck distinguishes the Lar. argentatus, Lath. Enl. 253,—Add the ni Goéland leucomele, Vieill. 61, and the Goél. a téte noire du Bengale. {Add L. ‘ca- pistratus, Temm.;—L. canus, L.. Enl. 977;—L. argentatus, Brunn: Enl. 253;—L. m argentatoides, Brehm. Am.Ed.) ° , & PALMIPEDES. ; 413 mains so ‘during the summer—Enl. 970; the feet and beak are more orlessred. It has been called, from its note, the Laugh- — emg Gull.Q) , ; , Lar. tridactylus, and Lar. rissa, Gm.; La M. 2 trois doigts, “Briss. VI, xvi, 1, and xvii, 2, is also very stati to the preced- ing species, but may be distinguished by its very short and im- perfect thumb. When young it is more or less spotted with black or brown, Enl. 387. ‘ ‘Lesrtris, Illig.(2)—Srercorarius, Briss.—Lazpes, Buff. These birds have very properly been separated from the Common Gulls. Their membranous nostrils, larger than those of the latter, open nearer to the point and edge of the beak; their tail is pointed. They pursue the small Gulls with singular ferocity to rob them of ther, food, and, as it is said, to devour their excrement. Hence their name. Lar. parasiticus, Gm.; Labbe a longue queue, Enl. 762; Edw. 148) (The Arctic Gull.) A deep brown above, white beneath; the two middle quills of the tail are double the length of the others. Itis very rare in France. When young it is all brown, and is then the Zar. crepidatus, Gm.; Enl. 991, or better, Edw. 149.(3) * ig, | The arctic regions produce a species the size of a Goéland, which is brown, with the base of the wing-quills white, Lar. ca- taractes, Gm., Brit. Zool. pl. L., 6; and another the size of a Mouette, brown above, white underneath, with a brown collar on the breast, the Zestris pomarinus, Tem.(4) Sterna, Lin.(5 ) The Terns, or Sea-Swallows, derive this latter appellation “from their excessively long and pointed wings and from their ae tail, (1) Add Lar. atricilla, Pall. Nov. Com. Petr., XV, xxii, 2; Catesb., I, 89; Wils. IX, Ixxiv, 4, by the name of ridibundus;—Lar. leucopierus;—L. cirrhocephalus, Vieill. Gal. 289, or poliscephalus, Licht.;—L. leucophithalmus, Licht. Col. 366;—L. Sabini, Leach;—L. minutus, Falk. Voy. Tl, xxiv;—L. melanurus, T. Col. 459, and Tiles, Voy. de Krusenst., pl. lvii. (2) Anspss, thief, the name of these birds among the Swedish fishermen. Vieil- lot has changed these names to STERcoreEvs. (3) This is clearly a mistake. The Z. crepidatus, Brehm. is identical with the L. Buffonii, Boie, Enl. 762. Am. Ed. (4) I cannot affirm the identity of the Lestris catarractes, Freycin., 38, and of the Stercoreus pomarinus, Vieill. Gal. 288, with the above species. (5) Stern, or Tern, is their English name, latinized as aboye by Turner, and ad- ~ mitted by Gesner. 414 AVES. @ which render their flight and carriage analogous to those of Swal- lows. Their bill is pointed, compressed, and straight, without curve or projection; the nostrils, placed near its base, are oblong and pierced quite through; the membranes, which unite their toes are deeply emarginate, consequently they swim but seldom. They fly over the waves in every direction and with great rapidity, uttering | loud cries, and skilfully raising from the surface of the water the © ' Mollusca and small Fish on which they feed. They also penetrate to the lakes and rivers of the interior. The most common species that is found on the fresh waters of France in the spring is, 6 — St. hirundo, L.; Le Pierre-Garin, &c., Enl. 9873 Frisch, 2193, Naum. 37, f. 52; Wils. VII, Ix, 1. (The Common Tern.) In the adult state, white with a light ash-coloured mantle, black calotte, red feet, and red bill with a black point. It is about one foot long,and two feet from the tip of one wing to that of the other. St. minuta, L.; Petit Hir. de mer, Enl. 996; Wils. V, Ix, 25 Naum. 38, f. 55. (The Small Tern.) Only differs from the pre- ceding by being a third smaller, and having a white forehead. St. cantiaca, Albin, II, Ixxxviii; Hir. de mer a bec noir, is larger than S. hirundo; the beak is black, with a yellow point: the Sz. striata, Gm., Lath. VI, pl. 98, is its young. # St. caspia, Pall. Saban! Mus. Carls., Ixii; Meyer, Ois. d’Al- lem., II, vi; Sav., Egypt., Ois. pl. ix, F. 1. (The Caspian Tern.) The largest of the European species; white, with an ash colour- ed mantle; occiput, black and white mixed; red beak and black feet. St. nigra, fisstpes and neevias Hir. de mer noire, Enl. 338 and 9243; Frisch, 220. (The Black Tern.) The tail less forked; when young, its mantle is spotted with black; the adult is al- most entirely of a blackish ash colour. Among the species foreign to Europe, we should notice the Hir. de mer @ aigrettes, St. inca, Less. and Garn., from the coast. of Peru, Voy. de la Coq., Zool. pl. 47, which is black; red bill and feet; a band on the cheek, and the feathers of the ear pen- dent and white.(1) (1) Add of Europ. Spec.: St. Dougalii, Montag.; Vieill., Gal. 290;—S?. anglica, Id., or aranea, Wils. VIL, Ixxii, 6;—St. arctica, Tem. i—St. leucopareia, Natter. ;— St. leucoptera, Tem., Schinz., Ois., de Suisse, frontisp. mt Of spec. foreign to Europe: St. cayana, Enl. 998;—St. melanauchen, Tem, col 427;—St. melanogaster, 1d. Col. 434;—St. fetiginote, Wils. + PALMIPEDES. 415 ¢ We may also distinguish from the other Terns, Pa tt ° ® : Tur Noppisgs, Whose tail is not forked, and is nearly as long as the wings. There is a slight projection under their bill, the first indication of _ that in the Mauves. But one species is known, ~ . St: stolida, L.3 Noddi noir, Eni. 997 (The Noddy), which is a blackish sole | top of the head whitish. Celebrated for the blundering manner in which it throws itself on vessels.(1) Ruyncuoprs, Lin. The Skimmers resemble the Terns in their small feet; long wings and forked tail, but are distinguished from all birds by their extra- ordinary bill, the upper mandible of which is shorter than the other, both being flattened so as to form simple blades, which meet without clasping. Their only mode of feeding is by skimming their aliment from the surface of the water with the lower PanliDls, which they effect while on the wing. One species, Rhym. nigra, L., Enl. 357 (The Black Skimmer), is white, with a black ridin and calotte; a white band on the wing; outside of the external quills of the tail white; bill and feet red; hardly as large as a Pigeon. From the vicinity of the An- tilles.(2) FAMILY WI. TOTIPALMATA. The birds of this family are remarkable for having the thumb | united with the toes by one single membrane, a mode of or- ganization that renders their feet complete oars, notwithstand - ‘ing which, they perch upon trees, being almost the only Palmi- pedes who do so. They all fly well and have short feet. Linnzus separated them into three genera, the first of which it was necessary to subdivide. (1) The St. philippensis, (Sonner. Voy. I, pl. Ixxxv,) does not appear to differ from the sfolida;—the St. fuscata, Lath., Briss., VI, pl. xxi, 1, also seems to be- long to this subgenus, as well as the St. tenucrostris, T. Col. 202. (2) Add Rhyn. flavirostris, Vieill. Gal. 291;—4h. cinerascens, Spix, Clj—Li. - brevirostris, Id. CI. 416 . AVES... bee’ . a _ — _—— Priecanus, Lin. Pe” Ay The Pelicans comprise ‘all those in which the bas of ‘the bill i s found to have some part destitute of feathers. Their nostrils aré’ . | fissures, the apertures of which are scarcely perceptible. Theskin » of their throat is more or less extensible, and their tongue very ” small. Their thin gizzard, with their other stomachs, forms alarge sac. Their ceca are moderate or small. ' ; : Prxecanus, Illig—Onocroratus,. Briss.(1), + . , The bill of the True Pelicans is very remarkable for its extr eme “< length, its straight, very broad and horizontally flattened form, for : the hook which terminates it, and for the lower mandible whose ‘y flexible branches sustain a naked membrane, susceptible of being dilated into’a large sac. _Two grooves extend along its length, in which the nostrils are concealed. The circumference of the eye is naked, and the tail round. €: P. onocrotalus, L.; Enl. 87; Edw. 92; Frisch, 186. (The Com- mon Pelican.) As large as a Swan, entirely white, slightly tinged | with flesh colour; the hook of the bill of a cherry-red; is more ~ ] or less disseminated throughout the eastern continent, breeds f in marshes, and feeds exclusively on living Fish. It is said to transport both food and water in its sac. The different changes this bird undergoes from age are not sufficiently ascertained to render certain the species of its genus that are enumerated. (2) PHatacrocorax, Briss.—Canrso, Meyer.—Hatixvs, Illig. (1) Pelecanus and Onocrotalus ave two Greek names of this bird Latinizéd: (2) I see no difference between the Common Pelican and the Pelec. roseus, Son- ner. Prem. Voy. pl. liv. As to the Pelec. manillensis, Id. LUI, Sonnerat himself says he thinks it is the young of the voseus. Neither can I find any difference be- ” tween the fustus, Edw. 93, and that of the Pl. Enl. 965, called roseus, but which i is q much more like the manillensis. Temminck thinks this figure represents the young q of the common species. The philippensis, Briss., V1, pl. lvi, is the same. specimen f \ The Cormorants(3) have an elongated ‘ant compressed beak, the cd from which the Pl. Enl. 965 was taken, so that both are the young of the onocrota- lus. That of pl. 957, also called fuscus, appears to be really a species identical © with that of Vieill. Gal. 276.—Add the Pel. a lunettes (P. perspicillatus, T.) Col.. 276. * tae é Z:, (3) Cormorant, from Cormoran, a corruption of Corbeau marin, on account of a a " black colour. It is in fact the Aquatic Crow of Aristotle. Phalacrocorax (Bi Crow) is the Greek name of this bird, indicated by Pliny, but is not employed Aristotle. That of Carbo is only used by Albert, who perhaps derived it from the as German name Scharb. To all these names Vieillot has added that of Eyre, Gal. 275. PALMIPEDES. 417 end of the upper mandible hooked, and that of the Iower one truncat- ed; the tongue is very small, and the skin of the throat less dilatable; the nostrils resemble a’small unpierced line, and the nail of the mid- dle toe is notched like a saw. The Trur Cormorants have a round tail composed of fourteen quills. Pel. carbo, L., Enl. 927; the young, Frisch, 187 and 188; and: Brit. Zool. pl. L, 1. (The Cormorant.) Black-brown, undulated with jet black on the back, and mixed with white near the end of the bill and front of the neck; circumference of the throat and the cheeks, white, in the male, which also has a tuft on the occiput. Its size is that of the Goose. It breeds in holes among the rocks or upon trees, and lays three or four eggs. Pel. graculus, Gm.; Enl. 974, the young. (The Little Cor- morant.) Is somewhat smaller, of a deeper black and more bronzed; no white on the front of the neck; the feathers on the back more pointed; not so common as the preceding species.(1) Tacuyretes, Vieill. The Frigate Birds differ from the Cormorants in their forked tail and short feet, the membranes of which are deeply emarginated; in an excessive length of wing, and in a bill both of whose mandibles are curved at the point. So powerful are their wings, that they fly to an immense distance from all land, principally between the tro- pics, darting upon the Flying Fish and striking the Boobies to make them disgorge their prey. _ One species only is well known, the Pelecanus aquilus, L., Enl. 961, Vieill., Gal., pl. 274, whose plumage is black, the under part of the throat and neck more or less varied with white, and the bill red. Its wings, when expanded, are said to measure from ten to twelve feet.(2) Sura, Briss.—Dysporus, Illig. The Boobies(3) have a straight, slightly compressed, pointed bill, the point slightly arcuated; its edges are serrated, the teeth pginc te Sanne, eRe ee (1) Add the Cormoran longup., Tem. (Pel. eristatus, Olafs.), Voy. en Isl., tr. fr. pl. xliv, Col. 322, and Vieill. Gal. 276;—Pel. africanus, Lath.; Sparm. Mus. Carls., 1, 10;—Pelec. pyemexus, Pall., Voy, App-, pl. 1. (2) Naturalists have, somewhat gratuitously, raised to the rank of species the Pelec. minor, Edw. 309, and leucocephalus, Buff. Ois., VII, pl. xxx, and perhaps even the P. Palmerstoni, Lath. (3) Sula is the name of the common species at the Feroe Islands, Hoyer, Clu- sius, Exot. 36. Booby, their English name, from their stupidity, ut sup. Vou. L—s C 418 AVES. . inclining backwards; the nostrils are prolonged by a line which ex- tends to near the point. The throat is naked as well as the circum- ference of the eye, the former not being susceptible of much dilata- tion; the nail of the middle toe is serrated, the wings much smaller than those of the Frigates, and the tail somewhat wedge-shaped. They are called Boobies on account of the excessive stupidity with which they permit themselves to be attacked by men and birds, the Frigate Birds particularly, which, as already stated, force them to yield up the fish they have captured. The most common is, Pelecanus bassanus, L.; Enl. 278; Vieill.; Brit. Zool. pl. L.; Naum. Sup. 56, f. 106. (The Common Booby). White; the pri- mary quills of the wings and the feet, black; the beak greenish; nearly as large as the Goose. It is called the Bassan Booby from a small island in the gulf of Edinburgh, where it is very abundant although it lays but a single egg. It is frequently seen on the coast of France during the winter. The young is brown spotted with white, Enl. 986. The remaining species are not yet sufficiently ascertained.(1) ’ é Prorus, Lin.(2) The Darters have the body and feet very similar to those of a Cor- morant; a long neck and small head, with a straight, slender, pointed beak, whose edges are denticulated; the eyes and nudity of the face, as in the Pelicans; their habits also are similar, perching on trees. Several species or varieties are known from the hot climates of both continents. They are not larger than the Duck, but they have a longer neck.(3) [See dpp. XXVII of Am. Ed.) Puaton, Lin. . The Tropic Birds are known by two very long and narrow feathers that flow from their tail, which at a distance resemble so many straws. There is no naked part about the head. Their bill is straight, pointed, denticulated, and tolerably strong; their feet short and their wings long: their powers of flight are consequently great, and as they rarely quit the torrid zone, their presence announces to the mariner his vicinity to the tropics. On land, where they seldom resort except to breed, they perch on trees. (1) Add the Fou brun (Pelec. sula, L.), Enl. 973, Catesb. I, 87; Vieill. Gal. 277. [See App. XXVI of Am. Ed.] ore (2) Plotus, or plautus, signifies, in Latin, flat-foot. Klein has employed it for one of his families of the Palmipedes. Linnzus applied it to the Darters. (3) Plot. melanogaster, Enl. 959 and 960; Vieill. Gal. 278; Wils. IX, Ixxiy, 1, 2;— Enl. 107;—Lath. Syn. VI, pl. 96:—Anhinga Levaillant, T. Col. 380. PALMIPEDES. 419 A few species or varieties only are known, whose white plu- mage is more or less varied with blackish, and which are not larger than Pigeons.(1) . FAMILY IV. LAMELLIROSTRES. In this family we find a thick bill, invested with a soft skin rather than with true horn; its edges are furnished with famine or little teeth; the tongue is broad and fleshy, the edges notched. The wings are of a moderate length, They pass more of their time on fresh waters than at sea. The tra- chea of the male, in the greater number, is inflated near its bifurcation into capsules of various forms. The gizzard is large and very muscular, the ceca long. The great genus, Awas, Lin. Comprises those Palmipedes, the edges of whose large and broad bill are furnished with a range of thin’ salient Jaminz, placed transversely, which appear destined to allow the water to pass off when the bird has seized its prey. They are divided into three sub- genera, whose limits, however, are not very precise. Cyenus, Meyer. The bill of the Swans is of an equal breadth throughout, higher at base than it is wides the nostrils about the middle of its length; the neck is very long. They are the largest birds of the genus, and feed chiefly on the seeds and roots of aquatic plants. Their intes- tines and czca in particular are consequently very long. There is no inflation of the trachea. Two species are found in Europe, Anas olor, Gm.;. Cigne & bec rouge, Enl. 913. (The Red-billed or Domestic Swan.) Beak red, edged with black, surmounted at base by a rounded protuberance; the plumage snow-white. When young, the beak is lead-coloured and the plumage grey. This is the species, when domesticated, that forms the orna- ment of our ponds and grounds. Its elegance of form, graceful movements, and snow-white plumage have rendered it the em- blem of innocence and beauty. It feeds both on fish and vege- (1) Pheet. xtherius, Enl. 369 and 998;—Ph. phenicurus, Enl. 979, Vieill. Gal. pl. 279. 420 It less AVES. tables, flies extremely high and with great swiftness, using its wings, which are a powerful weapon, in striking its enemies when attacked. It breeds among the reeds in ponds, and lays six or eight eggs of a®greenish-grey. An. cygnus, Gm.; Edw. 150; Brit. Zool. pl. 2; Naum., Ed. I, t. 13, f. 27. (The Black-billed Swan.) Bill black with a yel- low base; the body white tinged with a yellowish grey—when young, all grey. This species, which is very similar externally to the preceding one, differs essentially from it internally, in the trachea, which is bent over and penetrates to a considerable extent in a cavity of the keel of the sternum, a peculiarity com- mon to both sexes which does not exist in the domestic Swan. The latter is also erroneously called the Wild Swan, and the Singing Swan. The tale of its singing on the approach of death is a fable. a An. plutonia, Sh.; A. atrata, Lath.; Cigne noir; Nat. Misc. pl. 108; Vieill. Gal. 286 (The Black Swan), has been lately dis- covered in New Holland; it is the size of the common species, but its cafriage is less graceful and elegant; it is all black, the primary quills excepted, which are white, and the bill with the naked skin on its base, which is red.(1) is impossible to separate from the Swans, certain species, much elegant it is true, but which have the same kind of bill. Se- veral have a tubercle at.its base. The most common, An. cygnoides, L..; Oie de Guinée, Enl. 347, is bred in poultry yards, where it mixes with the Geese. It is a whitish grey with a brown grey mantle; the male is recognised by a feathered ap- pendage which hangs under his bill, and by a large tubercle which surmounts its base. Another species, much rarer, called by its first describers An. gambensis, L.; Oiede Gambie; Lath. Syn. III, p. 2, pl. 102, is remarkable for its size, long legs, tubercle on the forehead, and for two large spurs with which its wing is armed. Its plu- mage is a purple black, the throat, front, and under part of the body and wings, white.(2) (1) The Ote @ cravatte (An. canadensis, L.) Enl. 346, Wils., LX VII, 4, appears to me to be a true Swan. (2) Buff. has confounded this Goose with a variety of the Oie d’Egypte, Enl. 982. The figure of Latham is defective, inasmuch as it shows but one spur; the helmet also is not salient. (An. This is also the place for the Oie bronzée 4 créte sur le bec, Fpcaats apoa, of Marcgr. melanotos), Enl. 937, Vieill. 285. PALMIPEDES. 421 AnsER, Briss. Geese have a moderate or short bill, narrower before than be- hind, and higher than wide at base; their legs, being longer than those of the Ducks, and placed nearer the centre of the body, increase their facility in walking. Several of them feed on seeds and plants. There is no inflation at the root of the trachea, nor is there any curve in that organ in any of the species known. GreseE, properly so called, Have a beak as long as their head; the ends of the lamellz extend to its edges, appearing like pointed teeth. in. anser, L. (The Common Goose), which has acquired all sorts of colours in our poultry-yards, originates from a wild species that is grey, with a brown mantle undulated with grey and an orange-coloured beak, the Ans. cinereus, Meyer; Albin., 90; Naum. Ed. I, pl. 41, f. 60. There is another species, how- + ever, which arrives late in the fall, and which may be known by its wings being longer than the tail, and by some white spots on the forehead; its bill is orange with a black base and point. Ans. segetum, Meyer, Enl. 985; Frisch, 155; Naum., I, C. 42, fer. Anas albifroms, Gm.; L’Oie rieuses Edw. 153; Naum. Ed. I, 43,f. 62. (The White- fronted Goose.) Is sometimes seen in France during the winter. It is grey, with a black belly and white forehead. The north of both continents produces, a fourth species. An. hyperborea, Gm.; Wils. VIII, Ixviii, 5; and the young Ixix, 5; Naum. Ed. I, Sup. pl. 23, f. 46. (The Snow-Goose. ) White; feet and bill red; tips of the wing-quills black. It sometimes wanders into the temperate parts of Europe during the prevalence of heavy gales in winter. The young bird is more or less grey. ,It is the An. cwrulescens, Gm., Edw. 152. The BERNACLES(1) . Are distinguished from the Common Geese by a shorter and slenderer bill, the edges of which conceal the extremities. of the lamine. France is sometimes visited during the winter by that species - from the north of Europe, which is so celebrated by the fabu- Ce a ge (1) Bernacle, Scotch name of the .2. leucopsis. 422 AVES. % lous story of its growing on trees like fruit—Anas erythropus, Gm., or better 4n. leucopsis, Bechst. Enl. 885; Frisch, 1893 Naum. I, c. 39, f. 77. Its mantle is ash-coloured, its neck black; cheeks, throat, belly and forehead white; the bill black and the feet grey. An. bernicla, Gm.; Le Cravant,(1) Enl. 342; and better Frisch, 156; Naum. I, c. 39, f. 78; Wils., VIII, lxxii, 1 (The Brant), is from the same country... The’ head, neck, and quills ofthe wings are black, the mantle a brown-grey; a spot on each side of the upper part of the neck, and the wie part of the tail, white; the bill black and feet brown. An. egyptiaca, Gm.; Le Bernache armée; Oied’ Egypte, Sc. §¢- Enl. 379, 982, 983 (The Egyptian Goose), remarkable for the lustre of its colours and the small spur attached to its wing, also belongs to this subgenus; it is sometimes domesticated, but always retains a propensity to return to its wild state. It is the Chenaloper or Fox Goose, held in veneration among the ancient Egyptians on account of its attachment to its young. (2) The Crreopsis, Lath. Is a New Holland bird very similar to the Bernacles, with a still smaller bill, the membrane of which is much broader, and extends a little upon the forehead. Cer. cinereus, Lath., Col. 206; Vieill. Gal. 284, is the only one known. It is the size of a Goose, and of a grey colour. Anas, Meyer. Ducks, properly so called, have the bill broader at base than it is high, and wider at the end than towards the head; the nostrils nearer to its back and base. ‘Their legs being shorter than those of — Geese, and placed farther back, renders walking more difficult to them than to the latter. Their neck also is shorter; the trachea is inflated at its bifurcation into cartilaginous capsules, the left of which is usually the largest. The species of,the first division, or those whose thumb is bor- (1) Cravant, a corruption of grau ent, grey Duck. (2) Geoff. St. Hillaire, Ménag. du Mus. d’Hist. Nat. art. Oie d’Egypte. Add the dn. magellanica, Enl. 1006;—An. antarctica, which is closely allied to it, Mus., Carls., 37, and Voy. de la Coq. Zool. 50;—An. leucoptera, Brown., Ill. 40;—A. ruficollis and torquata, Pall. Spicil., VI, pl. iv, which is said to penetrate as far as Germany;—4n, coromandelica, Enl. 949, 950;—4dn. madagascariensis, Enl. 770. ° . 4 ae ® “ PALMIPEDES. “ 423 dered with a membrane, have a larger head, a shorter neck, the “feet placed farther back, smaller wings, a stiffer tail, more com- pressed tarsi, longer toes, and the membrane of the feet more entire. . They walk with more difficulty, feed more exclusively on fish and insects, and dive more frequently.(1) Among them we may distin- guish the Omen, Fleming. By the breadth and inflation of the bill. Anas nigra, L.; La Macreuse commune, Enl. 972; Naum. Supp. 14, f. 28 and 29; Brit. Zool. pl. 2, 6; Wils. VIII, Ixxii, 2.(The Scoter), is all black, greyish when young; the bill very broad with a protuberance on its base. It is found in large flocks on the coast of France, where it feeds chiefly on muscles. The An. cineraceus, Naum., I; C. 60, f. 91, 92, is. the young female. An. fusca, L.; La’ double Macreuse, Enl. 9563; Frisch, 165; ~ Naum. I, c. Supp. f. 15 and 16; Wils. LXXII, 3 (The Velvet Duck); differs in its superior size, a white spot on the wing, and a white streak under the eye. There is a circular, vertically flattened inflation in the middle of its trachea. An. perspicillata, L.; Enl. 995; Edw. 1553; Wils. VIII, Ixvii, 1. (The Black Duck.) Some white on the occiput and behind the neck; the naked and yellow skin of the base of its bill also surrounds the eyes. New Holland produces a speckled species, remarkable for a large fleshy appendage that hangs under its bill, dn. lobata, Nat. Misc., VIII, pl. 255, and Col. 406.(2) , We may also separate Cuancuta, Leach. » In which the bill is short and narrower towards the end; and place first on the list, those species the middle quills of whose tail are the longest, which renders it pointed. Such are An. glacialis, L., Enl. 1008; Edw. 280; Naum. 52, f. 76; Wils. VIII, Ixx, 1, 2; the young male, Enl. 999; Naum. 52, f. 76, B; the adult in wedding livery, Edw. 156. (The Long-tailed Duck.) _ (1) This division constitutes the genus PLaryrvs, ol ede or Hrproparss, -Tem.; or Furiewza, Ch. Bonap, (2) Add the Anas mersa and leucocephala, Voy. de Pall. fr. tr., pl. v and vi; Naum. Sup. 40, f. 79, 80;—the dn. brachyptera, Lath., Voy. de Freycin. pl. | « XXXIX. 424 + ne iy yan” & " AVES. ; # White; a fawn-coloured spot on the cheek and side of the neck; breast, back, tail, and part of the wing black. Of all the European Ducks, this has the shortest bill. Its trachea, ossified near the root, has on one side five square membranous spaces resembling so many panes of glass, above which it is inflated into an os- seous capsule. An. histrionica, L.; Enl. 798; Wils. VIII, Ixxii, 4; Edw. 995. Naum. I, 'e. 52, f. 77s and the female, 4n. minuta, 799; Edw. 197. (The Harlequin Duck.) Ash-coloured; the male fantasti- cally streaked with white; eyebrows and flanks red. Each of the preceding species is occasionally seen in France, but at very long intervals. Then comes the common species with a round or square tail. An. clangula, L.; Le Garrot, Enl. 802; the young, 4n. glau- cion, L.(1) Frisch, 181, 182; Naum. I, c. 55, f. 81, 82; Wils. *VIII, Ixvii, 6. (The Golden-eye.) White; head, back, and tail, black; a small spot before the eye and two bands on the wing, white; the bill blackish. The female is ash-coloured with a brown head. The middle of the trachea is considerably dilated, the two arches of the sac, however, preserving their flexibility. It becomes singularly widened near the bifurcation.(2) Somareria, Leach. The Eiders have a bill longer than that of the preceding sub- genus, and ascending more on the forehead where it is emarginated by an angle of feathers, but still narrower before than at base. After all these distinctions there remains the An. molissima; L’ Eider, Enl. 208, 209, the adults of both — sexes, Mus. Carls. 39; the three year old young male, Edw. 98; Wils. VIII, xci, 2, 3; Naum. 64, f. 79, 80. (The Eider Duck.) Whitish; calotte, belly and tail, black; the female grey, speckled with brown. Celebrated for furnishing u us with that valuable — article called eider down.(3) ' Furicuia, Leach, Whose beak is broad and flat, but presents no other peculiarity. Several species are found in France, in all of which the trachea ter- (1) Glaucton, the Greek name of a Duck, so called on account of the cage of: its eyes. (2) Add An. albeola, Enl. 948, the same as dn. bucephala, Catesb., 1, 95;—An. brachyptera, Voy. de Freycin. pl, xxxix. : (3) Add An. spectabilis, Sparm. Mus. Carls., Il, pl. xxxvi; Edw. 1545 ati. 40, ; f. 58, 59. | PALMIPEDES. 425 minates in nearly similar inflations, forming on the left a partially membranous capsule, supported bya frame and ramifications of bone. An. ferina, L.; A. rufa, Gm.; Millouin commun, Enl. 8033 Naum. I, c. 58, f. 87, 88; Wils. VIII, xc, 6. (The Red-head.) Ash-coloured, finely striated with blackish; head and top of the neck red; lower part of the neck and the breast brown; the bill a light lead-colour. Sometimes breeds among the reeds in the ponds of France. Its trachea is of an equal diameter. An. rufina, L.3 Mill. huppé, Enl. 928; Naum. I, c. 32, f. 63, 64. (The Pochard Duck.) Black; the back brown; some white on the wing and flank; the head red, the feathers on its summit turned up into a tufts red bill. From the borders of the Caspian sea, and occasionally driven by the winds as far as France. There are two successive inflations of its trachea, besides the capsule of the bifurcation: An. marila, L., Enl. 10023 Brit. Zool. 2; Wils. VIII, Ixix, 33 Naum. 59, f. 90; the female, An. freenata, Mus. Carls. 38; Naum. 59, f.90, B. (The Scaup Duck.) Ash-coloured, striated with black; head and neck black, changing to green; black rump and - stail; the belly and spots on the wing white; the bill lead- coloured; found in small flocks in France during the winter, but is from the remote parts of Siberia. Its trachea is very wide at the commencement, and then narrow. An. nyroca, Gm.; A. leucophtalmos, Bechst.; the female; /. africana, Gm.3; Le Petit Millowin, Enl. 1000; Naum. I, c. 39, f. 89. Brown; head and neck red; a white spot on the wing; belly whitish; a brown collar on the bottom of the male’s neck. _ Breeds in the north of Germany, and is rarely seen in France. Its trachea is very much inflated about the middle. An. fuligula, L.; Le Morillon, Enl. 1001; Frisch, 171; Naum. I, c. 56, f. 83, 84; Wils. VIII, Ixvii, 5; the young, Enl. 1007; An. scandiaca, Frisch, VI, xxxvi, 1, 2. (The Tufted Duck.) Black; the feathers of the occiput lengthened out into a tuft; the belly and a spot on the wing white; bill lead-coloured. Found in France every winter, where it proceeds from the North.(1) The Ducks of the second division,(2) whose thumb is not border- ed with a membrane, have a more slender head, narrower feet, (1) Add of species foreign to Europe: .4n. spinosa, Enl. 967, 968;—An: Stellera, Pall. Spic., VI, pl. v;—An. labradora, Wils. VII, lxix, 6;—An. valisneria, Ib LXX, 5;—An. rubida, tb. LXXI, 5, 6, of which, on account of its pointed: ‘tail M. Ch. Bonap. makes his genus Oxyura. (2) It is to this second division that M. Ch. Bonap. pardeiadly appiiea the name of Anas. Vout. IL.—3 D 426 . AVES. longer neck, the bill more equal, and not so thick a body; they walk better, and feed on aquatic plants and seeds as much as on fish, &c. The inflations of their trachea consist of a bony and cartilaginous homogeneous substance. They also admit of some subdivisions. Ruyncnaspis, Leach. A subgenus very remarkable for a long bill, the upper mandible of which, forming the exact half of a perfect cylinder, is widened at the end. Its lamellz are so long and delicate that they resemble hairs. These birds feed on small worms, which they obtain from the mud on the edge of brooks, &c. An. clypeata, L..; Souchet commun, Enl. 971, 9725 Frisch, 161, 162, 163; Wils. VIII, Ixvii, 7; Naum. 49, f. 70, 71 (The Shove- ler). A beautiful duck, with a green head and neck, white breast, red belly, and brown back; the wings are variegated with white, ash colour, green, brown, &e. It visits France in the spring, and is excellent game. The lower part of its trachea is. but slightly inflated. It is the Chenerotes of Pliny. An. fasciata, Sh., Nat. Misc. pl. 697, is another species found in New Holland. The edges of its upper mandible are extended on each side into a membranous appendage. rg Tapvorna.(1) The bill very much flattened towards the end, and bulging into a salient lump at base. An. tadorna, L.; Enl. 53; Frisch, 166; Naum. I, c. 55, f. 103 and 104, (The Shieldrake. ) The most highly coloured of all the European Ducks: white: the head green; a cinnamon-coloured cincture round the breast; the wing varied with black and white, red and green. Common on the shores of the North Sea, and of the Baltic, where it lays inthe downs, and frequently in holes 4 abandoned by rabbits. Its bifurcation is inflated into two nearly similar osseous capsules. Some Ducks of this second division have some naked parts about the head, and very often a lump on the base of the bill. ° In. moschata, L., Enl. 989, commonly but improperly called The Muscovy Duck; originally from South America, where it is still found in its wild state, and where it perches on trees; is now very common in our poultry yards, where it mixes with (1) Tudorne, the name of this bird in Belon. Buffon, following Turner, mis- took it for the Chenalopex of the ancients. — a oe PALMIPEDES. 427 the Common Duck. Its capsule is very large, circular, verti- cally flattened, and all on the left side. Some of them have pointed tails. “An. acuta, L.; Le Pilet, Enl. 9543 Wils. VIII, lxviii, 3 33 Frisch, 160 and 168; Naum. 51, f. 74 and 75. (The Pintail.) Ash ada ed above and on the flanks, finely striped with black; white be- neath; the head tawny, &c. The capsule of the trachea is small. The males of others have some of the feathers of the tail recurved. An. boschas, L.(1) Enl. 776, 7773 Wils. VIL, be 7 Frisch, 158 and 159 (The Mallard), is known by its pale yellow feet, yellow bill, the beautiful changeable green of the head, and rump of the male, &c. In our poultry-yards it varies in colour, like all other domestic animals. The wild breed is common in the marshes; it builds among the reeds, in the hollow trunks of willows, and sometimes upon trees. Its trachea terminates be- low, in a large osseous capsule. A singular variety is found in the Hook-billed Buck the 4n. adunca, L. Some of them have a crested head, and a bill somewhat more narrow at the end, which, though foreign, are reared in all the avia- ries of Europe. Such are, _ dln. sponsa, L.; Enl. 980 and 981; Wils. VIII, Ixxviii, 3 (The Summer Duck): and An. galericulata, L., Enl. 805 and 806; _Vieill. Gal. 287 (The Chinese Duck). Some of the wing-fea- thers in the male of this latter species are widened and turned up vertically, in addition to those of the tail. Their capsules are rounded, and of a moderate size. There are other species which to the bill of a Duck add legs, even longer than those of a Goose; they build and perch on trees.(2) Some of this number have but semi-palmated feet.(3) Finally among those which have no peculiar mark is the An. strepera, L.; Le Chipeau; Enl. 958; Naum. I, c. 45, f. 65; Wils. VIII, Ixxi, 1. (The Gadwal.) Reticulated and finely striped with black; wings, red with a green spot and a white one. The capsule of the trachea is small. An. Penelope, L.; Le Siffleur; Enl. 825; Frisch, 164 and 169; Naum. f. 72 and 73.(4) (The Whistler.) Finely striped with (1) Borxas, Greek name of the Mallard. (2) An. arborea, Enl. 804;—autumnalis, 826;—viduata, 808. [The Anas sponsa and the 4. moschata likewise build on trees. Am. Ed.) . (3) An. semipalmata, Lath.; Cuv. Mém. du Mus. (4) Penelope, the Greek name of a red headed Duck, either the present spe- cies or the ferina, L. 428 AVES. black; vinous-coloured breast; red head; pale forehead; the wing white, green, and black. The capsule is rounded, moderate, and very bony.(1) There are several small species designated by the general name of Tra. in. querquedula, L.; La Sarcelle ordinaire, Enl. 946, and the old male, 4n. circia, Frisch, 176; Naum. 47, f. 66 and 67. (The Garganey Duck.) A grey ground, reticulated with black; a white line round, and at the end of the eye, &c. Common on ponds, &c. Its capsule is a pyriform enlargement. An. erecca, L.; La petite Sarcelle; Enl. 947; Frisch, 174; Naum. 48, f. 68, 69; Wils. VIII, Ixx, 4; Brit. Zool. pl. 2. (The Com- mon Teal.) Finely striped with blackish; the head red; a green band at the corner of the eye edged with two white lines, &c. The capsule resembles a pea.(2) Mereus, Lin. The genus of the Mergansers comprehends those species in which the bill, thinner and more cylindrical than that of ‘the Ducks, is armed along its edges with small pointed teeth resembling those of a saw and directed backwards; the tip of the upper mandible is hooked. Their carriage and even plumage are those of Ducks, pro- perly so called; but their gizzard is less muscular, and their intes- tines and ceca shorter. The inflation of the lower larynx in the males is enormous, and partly membranous. They live on lakes ene ponds, where they are very destructive to fish. Three species are found in France during the winter, whose variations of plumage have induced some naturalists to increase the number. It is said that they breed in the North among the rocks or reeds, and lay a great many eggs. Merg. merganser, L..; Le Harle vulgaire; Enl. 951; Naum. I, c. 61} f. 93, Brit. Zool. pl. N3 Frisch, 190; Wils. VIII, lxviii, 1 (The Goosander), is the size of a Duck, and has red feet and a bill of the same hue. The head of the old male is of a deep green, the feathers on its summit forming asort of toupee; the mantle is black, with a white spot over the wing; under- (1) Add An. rutila, Pall. Nov. Com. Petrop., XIV, xxii;—An. cana and casarca, Brown, Ill. 41 and 42;—n. pexcilorhyncha, Indian Zool. pl. xiv;—the Jensen (An. americana), Enl. 955, Wils. VIII, lxix, 4;—the Maree (An. bahamensis), Catesb. 93;—.An. obscura, Wils. VII, Ixxii, 5;—An. arcuata, Gm. or paturi, Spix, C (2) Add, An. discors, Enl. 966 and 403;—/An. manillensis, Sonner. Voy. I, pl. lv. PALMIPEDES. 429 neath and the neck, white, slightly tinged with rose-colour. The young and the females—Merg. castor, Enl. 953; Frisch, 191; Naum. 61, f. 93, B, are grey with a red head. . Merg. serrator, L.; Harle huppé; Enl. 207; Edw. 95; Naum. I, c. 61, f. 90; Wils. VIII, Ixix, 2. (The Red-breasted Mergan- ser.) Bill and feet reds the body variegated with black, white, and brown; head of a black-green; a pendent tuft on the occi- put. The young and the females,—Harles noirs, H. 2 manteau noir; Naum. 62, f. 95, have a brown head. M. albellus, L.; La Piette; Enl. 449; Frisch, 172; Naum. 63, f. 97; Brit. Zool. pl. N. 1; Wils. VIII, xci, 9. (The Smew.) Bill and feet blue; body white, varied with black on the man- tle; a black spot near the eye, and one on the occiput. The young males and the females——Merg. minutus, mustelinus, &c. Enl. 450; Brit. Zool. pl. N. 2; Naum. 63, f. 98, are grey with a red head.(1) (1) Among the Mergansers foreign to Europe, the only ones well ascertained — are the M. cucullatus of Carolina, Enl. 935 and 936, and the . brasiliensis, Vieill. Gal. 283. i. & , ' satiew HRI a Ar di on ostnaee ire “aye yeas ll a ii Stein. cea? (Ma, biel Yi aide nie Be Aion tae "oulbe? AR eee ; ad’. Petiginbe: adddeordas tie ri ie Deis Bais vac Vives phere, 2 Sr danaimel is ame Me i abet bo : be se ’ wu: y a an * c v : i + ew tj" nie) r~ ‘ — rat ane! Oo a: a ~. s , "+ ute _ aa aanll : vile ‘ &.- a ig ea ant? Litwin ET! fs. LP te Linen > R 1. | ih a Moga ae. ite ak Bite is Vibes fie 8.0) APPENDIX OF THE AMERICAN EDITOR. 1h Vesp. carolinensis, Geoff. Anterior upper fore-teeth sub-simple, larger than the ial remarkable for a strong odour resembling that of a Fox. V. lucifugus, L. C. Anterior upper fore-teeth bilobate; body above dark brown, beneath cinereous; nose sub-bilobate; face with a nakedish prominence on each side; ears oblong, naked, tragus sub- linear, half as long as the ears; tail projecting a little beyond the membrane; length to the insertion of the tail two inches and a quar- ters tail one inch and a quarter. V. noctivagans, L.C. Anterior upper fore-teeth bilobate, the posterior sub-simple; colour black or dusky cinereous; hair on the back and belly tipped with grey; ears short, naked, roundish; tragus short and roundish; nose sub-bilobate; tail projecting a little beyond the interfemoral membrane, which is hairy; length two inches and five eighths; tail one and three eighths. TT: Add Plec. macrotis, L.C. Upper fore-teeth, four, trilobate, dis- tant by pairs, the posterior smaller; ears very long, pointing for- wards; tragus subulate, half the length of the ears.(1) (1) There is another species with equally long ears, which are not united on the cranium; which of these is the megalotis of Raffin., it is impossible to say. 432 APPENDIX. Ill. Nyc. noveboracensis. Easily known by its short and round ears, and by the interfemoral membrane being hairy and including the whole of the tail. There is a white spot at the insertion of the wing and another at the base of the thumb; these marks are constant. This species varies much in colour, and has been called V. lasiurus by Schreber, V. monachus by some, and is figured Wils. Orn. VI, pl. 4, whence it has been quoted by M. Cuvier as the Zaphizéus. yct. crepuscularis, L. C. Above brown, beneath paler; a small black wart above each eye; nose somewhat bilobate; chin with a small double wart; ears moderate; tragus small, subulate; tail pro- jecting a little beyond the membrane. Nyct. cynocephala, L. C. The posterior fore-tooth on each side smaller than the rest which are emarginate; nose furnished on the top and sides with stiff short bristles; lips very large, somewhat pendulous; ears broad, round, naked; tragus not apparent; tail long, extending far beyond the membrane; outer and inner toes of the hind feet woolly on the outside; the rest with each two long hairs on the top. IV. Meles europza; Ursus meles, L. (European Badger.) Above, grey, beneath, black; a blackish band on each side of the head. Meles labradoria; Ursus labradorius, L. (American Badger.) Above grey, beneath paler; head brown, with a narrow white line on the top; under jaw and throat white. From a comparison of these two descriptions it will be seen, that it is impossible that they can be but one species. They are totally distinct. V. : This is the animal called the Mink in the United States, and is identical with the Vison. We have another, the Must. Pennanti, Erxl., the Fisher, as it is commonly called, which in its manners resembles the Must. martis. VI. Add to the description of Canis lycaon, “found also in America, in the Missouri country and in Canada.’’ The other species, C. Jatrans, and C. nubilus, mentioned in note (3), page 106, are probably varie- ties of C. lupus. This animal always hunts in company, and barks when in pursuit of its prey. It varies much in colour, being grey, + reddish, black, mixed black and grey, grey and reddish, and grey, reddish and black, and in size from that of a small dog to that of the largest mastiff. i] VII. The Canis fulvus of some authors, the American Red Fox, is identical with the European, and was introduced (at least into the United States) by some Englishmen, who thought it afforded better sport than the American species: not many years ago persons were living who remembered when they were first brought to New Eng- land. ' VIL. This is an error. The Sc. cinereus, LL. (The Cat Squirrel), of our country is cinereous above, beneath white, tail less distichous than that of other species, longer than the body and striped with black; length twelve inches, tail fifteen. There are but four teeth in the upper jaw oneach side. Inhabits the northern and middle states. Sc. carolinensis, L. (Little Grey Squirrel.) Above mixed white, blackish and rusty; beneath white; cheeks rusty; tail as long as the body, edged with white; upper jaw teeth, five on each side. This is the species described by our author as the cinereus. ~ Sc. vulpinus. (The Fox Squirrel.) Length fourteen inches, tail six- teen; very much resembles the Sc. cinereus, but differs in size and in the texture of the fur which is coarser and longer, the hair having frequently the appearance of being twisted or even geniculate. The Sc. capistratus is a variety of this species, and so, most probably, is the rufiventris. Some individuals are entirely of a rusty colour, | others wholly black, and others again varied like a tortoise-shell cat. Allthese have been found together in the same nest. The Se. niger of some authors is the black variety of these three species. The Se. cinereus is sometimes found entirely white with black eyes. The other species found in the United States are Sc. macrourus, Says—Sc. grammarus, Id.;—Sc. 4-vittatus, Id.;—Sc. lateralis, Id. 5 —Sc. hudsonius, Gm. IX. Some confusion appears to exist in this note with respect to the Vou. L—s E APPENDIX. g) ! 45 y A434 : APPENDIX. location of several American species, which truly belong to the Aryicota, Cuy. or Hypupzus of Illiger. é X. Add, of American species, Hypudceus xanthognatus, Leach;—Hyp. riparius? Ord. A subdivision of this group will embrace the Hyp. hispidus (Sigmodon, Say), and Hyp. messor, L. C: and another sub- division, Hyp. floridanus (Neotoma, Say), and Hyp. gossipinus, L. C. KI. Here should come the new genus Psammomys, Le Conte, described Ann. Lyc. Nat. Hist. of New York, III, 3, pl. 2,, which differs from all the preceding in the form of the jaw teeth. The eyes are very small, and the ears scarcely visible. It burrows like the Sorex. But one species has-yet been found—P. ‘pinetorum, L. C.—which inhabits the pine forests of Georgia. Its hair is a dark shining cinereous colour, tipped above with brown, beneath a very pale ash; head large and blunt; tail round and hairy.(1) XII. ~~ Cathartes aura. (Turkey Buzzard.) Black, with a bluish gloss; neck feathered equally all round; head red, bill white. The other species Cathartes iota, Vieill. which by our author »is arranged in the genus Percnopterus, undoubtedly belongs to, thewape genus with the C. aura. Its vulgar name is the Carrion Crow. Its colour is black, neck more feathered above than beneath; head black; bill horn-colour. * Both these species are common in the warm parts of our country: the first, however, ranges more to the north than the other; it is sometimes seen at New York. They prey upon carrion and excrementitious matters, but never attack living animals except they perceive them helpless or unable to defend themselves. XIII. These citations, from F. pennsylvanicus, Wils. to F. hyemalis, Wils. (1) On examining the work of Ruppel lately received at the Ac. of Nat. Sc. of Philad., I find that he has anticipated Major Le Conte in the generic use of the word Psammomys. As the rule of priority should be inexorably adhered to in these cases, I would propose for the American animal the generic appellation of Piry- mys, or Pine-mouse. APPENDIX. 435 IV, xxxv, 1, are wrong. Instead of them should be inserted F. penn- sylvanicus, Wils. VI, pl. liv, f. 1; —#. velox (Slate-coloured Hawk), Wils. VI, pl. xlvi, f. 1;—. dubius, Gm. These three birds are con- sidered (Syn. Am. Birds of Ch. Bonap.) as the same, and as identi- cal with the F. fuscus of Gmel. XIV. Add M. Sayi, Bonap. Am. Or.I, pl. ii, f. 3;—M. fusca, Gm. Wils. Orn. I, pl. Ixiii, f. 5; J. acadica, Gm. Wils. I, pl. xiii, f. 3. XV. Here should come the genus Vireo, Vieill. (Muscrcara, L., &c.).. These have a bill like the Muscicapa, but it is shorter, not so much depressed, but rather compressed; bristly at base; upper mandible curved at the tip; tongue bifid at the tip. The colour of all the spe- _ cies is olive, more or less inclining to yellow. WV. flavifrons, Vieill. (Wils. Il, pl. 7, f. 3, MW. sylvicola). Throat, breast, forehead, and circle round the eyes, yellow. V. solitarius, Vieill. (MM. solitaria, Wils. Il, pl. xvii, f. 6). Head, bluish; circle round the eyes white, breast pale ash, belly white. V. noveboracensis, Vieill. (M. noveboracensis, Gm., M. cantatriz, “Wils. Il, pl. xviii, f. 6). Spot at the base of the upper mandible, and circle round the eyes, yellow; eye-lids white. : WV. gilvus, Bonap. (Sylvia gilva, Vieill., M. melodia, Wils. V, pl. xlii, f. 2). A line over the eyes, and body beneath, white; eye-lids, brown. \ V. olivaceus, Vieill. (M. olivacea, L. Wils. I, pl. xti, f. 3). Crown, cinereous, bounded on the sides with black; line over the eyes, white; eye-lids, rufous. XVI. The 7. minor, Gm., is quoted in this note as a synonyme of the T. mustelinus, Wils., when in fact it is the solitarius, Wils., V, p. xliii, f. 2. The 7. mustelinus, Gm., is the 7. melodes, Wils. I, p. ii, f. 1. The 7. mustelinus, Wils., is the 7. Wilsoniz, Bonap. Wils. V, p- xliii, £3. 436 APPENDIX. . XVII. Add to this note for American species; J. awrocapilla, L. Wils. II, pl. xiv, f. 2;—/. noveboracensis, Lath. Wils. IT], pl. xxiii, f. 5;— M. coronata, Wils. Il, pl. xvii, f. 4; M. palmarum, Bonap. II, pl. x, f. 2;—M. maculosa, Lath. (Sy/. magnolia, Wils.) Wils. III, pl. xxiii, f. 2;—M. maritima, Wils. VI, pl. li, f. 8;—M. pardalina, Bonap. (Muse. canadensis, Wils.) Wils. Il, pl. xxvi, f. 2;—/M. mitrata, Bo- nap. (Muse. cucullata, Wils.) Wils. IIT, pl. xxvi, f. 3;—M. pensilis, (Syl. flavicollis, Wils.) Wils. Il,» pl. xii, f. 6;—JZ. virens, Wils. I, pl. xvii, f. 3;—. Blackburneve} Wils..TH, pl. xxviii, f, 3;—J/. icte- rocephala, Lath. (Syl. pennsylvanica, Wils.) Wils. I, pl. xiv, f. 5;— M. castanea, Wils. Il, pl. xiv, f. 45—J/. striata, Wils. IV, p. xxx, f. 3;—WM. varia, Lath. (Certhia maculata, Wils.) Wils. III, p. xix, f. 33— M. pinus, Wils. III, pl. xix, f. 4;—M. parus, Wils. V, p. liv, f. 35 . ae tigrina (Syl. montana, Wils.) Wils. V, p. xii, f. 2;—M. Tard, Wils. III, pl. xlvii, f. 2;—/. discolor (Syl. minuta, Wils.) Wils. TTS pl. xxv, f. 4;—W. eestiva (Syl. citrinella, Wils.) Wils. 11, Pagxv, £633 —WM. petxchia, Wils. pl. xxviii, f. 4;—J/. americana (Syl. pusilla, Wils.) Wils. 1V, p. 28, xxviii, f. 3;--/M. canadensis, Wils. I, pl. xv, f. 73—M. agilis, Wils. V, pl. xxxix, f. 4;—J/Z. formosa, Wils, III, pl. xxv, f. 3;—M. autumnalis, Wils. III, pl. xxiii, f. 4;—. trichas, Wils. I, pl. vi, f. 1 and 2, pl. xviii, f. 4;—. philadelphica, Wils. I, pl. xiv, f. 6;—/. sphagnosa, Bonap. Wils. V, pl. xlili, f. 4;—M. — rea, Steph., Bonap. II, pl. xi, f. 2, and Wils. I, pl. xvii, f. 53— cerulea, Wils. II, pl. xviii, f. 5;—M. minuta, Bonap. (Muse. minuta,, Wils.) Wils. VI, pl. 1, f. 5;—J/. Wilsonii, Bonap. (Muse. pusilla, Wils.) Wils. III, pl. xxvi, f. 4. ° 2 _ XVIIL The Mot. pensilis, zstiva, ludoviciana, and canadensis quoted in this note by our author, do not belong to this subgenus. There should, however, be added for American species, W. calendula,: Wils. I, p. v, f. 3;—. eristatus, Wils. I, p. viii, f. 2. XIX. It may be as well to insert here the genus Icrrria of Vieillot, which, from its resemblance to many of the preceding genera, al- APPENDIX. ; 437 though it wants the emargination on the upper mandible, cannot be more appropriately arranged. Bill strong, convex, somewhat curved, compressed, almost entire, bristly at base; mandibles sub-equal, edges somewhat bent in; nos- . trils round, half covered by a membrane; tongue slightly bifid at the tip; intermediate between Turdus, Muscicapa, Vireo and Tanagra. There is but one species known, Jct. dumicola, Vieill. which inhabits the United'States (Pipra polyglotta, Wils. I, p. vi, f. 2). It is olive- green, with the throat and breast yellow; belly white; circle round the eyes, and line above them yellow. XX. Add for American species: F. amena, Bonap. I, p. viii, f. 4;— F. cyanea, Wils. 1, p. vi, f. 53. ciris, Wils. III, p. xxiv, f. 1 and 23—F. americana, Wils. I, p. iii, f. 23—F. leucophrys, Wils. I, p. xxxi, f. 4;—F. grammaca, Bonap. I,:p. v, f. 23—F. pennsylvanica, Wils. III, p. xxii, f. 2;—F. graminea, Wils. IV, p. iii, f. 5;—F melodia, Wils. II, p. xvi, f. 4;—F. savanna, Wils. IV, p. xxxiv, f. 4;—F. passerina, Wils. III, p. xxiv, f. 5;—F. canadensis, Wils. I, p: xvi, f. 3;—F. socialis, Wils? II, ps xvi, f. 5;—F. palustris, Wils. II, p. xxii, f. 1;—#'. caudacuta, Wils. iy, p. xxxiv, f. 33;—F. mari- tima, Wils. p. xxxiv, f. 2. + XXI. Ada F. psaltria, Banap. I, p. vi, f. 3;—F. pinus, Wils. II, p. Avi, {791'. . od ey XXII. Add for-American species: D. vermivora, Wils. II, p. xxiv, f. 4;—D. prothonotarius, Wils: I, pl. xxiv, f. 2;—JD. solitaria, Wils. II, p. xv, f. 4;—D. chrysoptera, Wils. I, p. xv, f. 2;—D. peregrina, Wils. III, p. xxv, f. 2;—D. rubricapilla, Wils. Ill, p. xxvii, f. 33— _D. celata, Bonap. I, p. v, f. 2. All the birds of this genus are more nearly allied to Muscicapa and Sylvia, and ought to be arranged with them. XXIII. The genus Quiscatus of Vieillot should find a place between this genus and Caryocatactes. Its characters are as follows: 438 ‘APPENDIX. . Bill large, compressed from the base, entire, the edges angular, hardly bent in; upper mandible curyed from the middle, longer than the lower, with an osseous prominence in the middle; tongue bifid at tip; nostrils half closed by a membrane. Q. major, Bonap. I, p. iv, f..1 and 2 (Graeula barrita of authors, Jackdaw of the south). Black, with a blue gloss mixed with purple; head and neck purples iris yellow. Female dusky; back, wings and tail with a slight bluish gloss; head and neck dark brown; throat, breast and belly, brown. '? Q. versicolor, Vieill. Wils. III, p. xxi, f. iv (Grac. quiscula of au- thors). Black, with a bluish gloss, mixed with purple; head and neck with a purple gloss; iris yellow. Female more dusky. Both these species are similar in their manners, are gregarious, and com- mit great devastation in fields of grain. Q. ferrugineus, Bonap. Wils. III, p. xxi, f. 3 (Grae. ferruginea of authors). Black, with feathers more orless tipped with ferruginous. N.B. Previous to the labours of M. C. Bonaparte, these three birds were not understood. It is needless to occupy any space in commenting on the errors that have hitherto existed respecting them. ° XXIV. > Add, Tot. macularius, Temm. Wils. VIII, p. lix, f. 1. The Pha- laropus frenatus alluded to by our author in note (3) is not figured in Wilson, IX, p. lxiii, f. 3. The bird there represented is the Lobipes Wilsonii of Sabine. ’ Ja + e° XXV. Here should come the genus Aramus, Vieill. characterized as follows.—Bill much longer than the head, cleft beneath the eyes, compressed, straight, curved, and somewhat turgid at tip; upper mandible slightly furrowed, the lower turgid towards the middle, angular beneath, acute; nostrils in wide orifices, linear, pervious; lores naked; feet long; toes divided to their base, hind toe long. lr. scolopaceus, Vieill. Brown glossed with green; feathers longi- tudinally white in the middle; rump, quill, and tail feathers imma- culate. Inhabits Georgia and Florida, Bonap. Syn. p. 308. APPENDIX, ‘ 439 XXVI. The Pel. sula, 1... The Brown Booby, Enl. 973, is the Sula fusca, Briss. , XXVII. Closely allied to the genus Prorus is the Hexrornis of Vieillot which chiefly differs from it in having a shorter and slenderer bill, the edges of which are entire, not denticulate. But two species are known, the H. surinamensis, Enl. 893. Brown, beneath*whitish; sides of the neck striped with black and white; bill and feet dusky, the latter semi-palmate and barred with black. The other is the H. senegalensis, Vieill. Gal. 280. Brown, beneath white; sides of the neck and back speckled with black; bill and feet red; toes connected only at the base; tail cuneiform. oe: ae alan tas eh Ss % + eget agit ) eae ate. eg PM eel hg a gage Den tay DBs iy Joa ligne ones aay Pedy ita Me i er “iy “j a je & ht r oe : Py od aoe) ae Al 4. gh we ee me ae eal CATALOGUE OF THE MAMMALIA AND BIRDS OF THE UNITED STATES. MAMMALIA. CARNARIA. CHEIROPTERA. Vespertilio carolinensis Nycticea noveboracensis lucifugus, L. C. crepuscularis, L. C. noctivagans, L. C. cynocephalus, L. C. Plecotus macrotis, L. C. INSECTIVORA. Sorex(1) Scalops aquaticus Condylura cristata CARNIVORA. PLANTIGRADA. Ursus americanus Meles labradoria horribilis Gulo luscus Procyon lotor NOs cee Sy NS Se (1) We have many species of this genus in the United States, but not one that has yet been properly determined. Vou. I.—3 F 442 Putorius vulgaris erminea lutreola Mustela martes Pennantii Mephitis putorius Lutra brasiliensis Sciurus carolinensis cinereus vulpinus macrourus grammarus 4-vittatus hudsonius striatus lateralis Pteromys volucella hudsonia Arctomys monax Hoodii Mus musculus rattus decumanus Cervus alces canadensis CATALOGUE, DIGITIGRADA. Canis lupus lycaon vulpes cinereo-argenteus Felis discolor rufa borealis AMPHIBIA. Phoca vitulina MARSUPIALIA. Didelphis virginiana RODENTIA. Meriones canadensis labradorius Fiber zibethicus Hypudzus xanthognathus riparius? Ord hispidus messor, L. C. floridanus gossypinus, L, C. Psammomys pinetorum, L. C. Saccomys bursarius Castor fiber Hystrix dorsata Lepus variabilis americanus RUMINANTIA. Cervus virginianus macrotis Antilope lanigera furcifer Delphinus Delphis phocena Cathartes aura tNosiLes Falco communis Cooperi, Bonap. sparverius fuscus columbarius ttH1eRoFALcones Falco atricapillus TtTAQuILz Falco fulvus haliztos leucocephalus ttttAsTuRES tOrr Strix nevia otus brachyotus ttSrRicEs Strix flammea ttt Busonss Strix magellanica CATALOGUE. Ovis Ammon Bos bison CETACEA. Delphinus orca Balzna mysticetus ne AVES. ACCIPITRES. DIURNZ. VULTURINE. Carthartes jota FALCONES. Falco palumbarius pennsylvanicus tttttMinvi Falco furcatus dispar, Temm. plumbeus, Gm. tttttt BuTEONEsS Falco lagopus Sancti Johannis borealis tttttttCires Falco hyemalis pygargus NOCTURN &. Strix cinerea ttttNocruz Strix funerea nyctea cunicularia acadica tttttULuLz Strix nebulosa 443 444 CATALOGUE. PASSERIN /. DENTIROSTRES. Lanius ludovicianus Motacilla maculosa septentrionalis maritima +Tyrannus pardalina, Bonap. Muscicapa tyrannus mitrata crinita pensilis verticalis, Bonap. virens forficata Blackburniz ttMuscicapa icterocephala Muscicapa Sayi, Bonap. castanea fusca striata virens varia ruticilla pinus Vireo flavifrons parus solitarius tigrina noveboracensis rara gilvus discolor olivaceus estiva Bombycilla garrula pulchra americana americana carolinensis canadensis Tanagra estiva agilis rubra formosa ludoviciana autumnalis Turdus polyglottos trichas migratorius philadelphica lividus sphagnosa, Bonap. rufus azurea minor coerulea mustelinus tiTREGULI Wilsonii, Bonap. Motacilla calendula Myothera obsoleta, Bonap. cristata tSax1coLaz Troglodytes aedon Motacilla sialis europzus ttSyiviz palustris Motacilla aurocapilla ludovicianus noveboracensis Anthus spinoletta coronata Icteria dumicola palmarum CATALOGUE. 4A5 FISSIROSTRES. +CypsELi Hirundo bicolor Hirundo pelasgia riparia t}tHirunpinEs Caprimulgus carolinensis Hirundo purpurea virginianus rufa vociferus fulva CONIROSTRES. Alauda alpestris tttCaARDUELES Parus bicolor Fringilla tristis atricapillus psaltria Emberiza nivalis pinus Pyrgita iliaca linaria erythrophthalma Coccothraustes cardinalis +Spizz vespertina, Bonap. Fringilla amcena, Bonap. ludoviciana cyanea cerulea cirls purpurea +TPAssERES Pyrrhula frontalis, Bonap. Fringilla americana Loxia curvirostra leucophrys leucoptera grammaca Corythus enucleator pennsylvanica Xanthornus baltimorus graminea spurius melodia phoeniceus savanna xanthocephalus nivalis pecoris passerina agripennis laponica Dacnis vermivora canadensis prothonotarius socialis solitarius pusilla chrysoptera palustris peregrina caudacuta rubricapilla maritima ciliata, Bonap. Sturnus ludovicianus CORACES. Corvus corone corax ossifragus Corvus columbianus pica Garrulus cristatus 446 CATALOGUE. Garrulus floridanus Quiscalus versicolor canadensis ferrugineus Quiscalus major TENUIROSTRES. Sitta canadensis Certhia familiaris carolinensis Trochilus colibris pusilla Alcedo alcyon SCANSORLE. Picus auratus Picus pubescens , principalis querulus pileatus torquatus erythrocephalus tridactylus carolinus Cuculus americanus varius erythrophthalmus villosus Psittacus carolinensis GALLINACE/. Meleagris gallopavo Perdix virginiana 7 Tetrao canadensis californiana obscurus Columba fasciata, Bonap. urophasianus, Bonap. zenaida, Bonap. umbellus leucocephala cupido passerina phasianellus migratoria albus carolinensis GRALLATORLE. PRESSIROSTRES. Charadrius semipalmatus, Bonap. Charadrius pluvialis melodus Squatarola helvetica Wilsonii Hezmatopus ostralegus vociferus CULTRIROSTRES. Grus canadensis on oo TARDEZ americana ay Ardéa Herodias Ardea alba Pealii, Bonap. candidissima ludoviciana ttBoraurti 7 Ardea violacea CATALOGUE, Ardea nycticorax coerulea minor virescens Tantalus loculator Platalea ajaja LONGIROSTRES. ‘Ibis rubra alba Numenius longirostris hudsonicus borealis Scolopax minor paludosa Limosa xgocephala fedoa Calidris maritima Temminckii minuta pusilla islandica Arenaria calidris Pelidna alpina subarcuata Schinzii pectoralis platyrhynca maritima Machetes pugnax 447 Hemipalama semipalmata, Bonap. Phalaropus fulicarius, Bonap. Totanus semipalmatus melanoleucus flavipes Bartramius solitarius macularius Lobipes hyperborea Wilsonii, Bonap. Himantopus nigricollis Recurvirostra americana Rallus crepitans virginianus carolinus noveboracensis Gallinula martinica chloropus Fulica americana Pheenicopterus ruber PALMIPEDES. BRACHYPTERA. Podiceps cristatus Uria troile subcristatus Brunnichii, Sab. cornutus Cephus alle carolinensis Fratercula cirrhata Colymbus glacialis arctica septentrionalis Alca torda Uria grylle 448 Procellaria Wilsonii, Bon. Leachii, Bonap. glacialis Larus minutus capistratus atricilla tridactylus canus eburneus fuscus argentatus argentatoides leucopterus glaucus Pelecanus onocrotalus fuscus Phalacrocorax carbo graculus cistatus Tachypetes aquilus CATALOGUE. LONGIPENNES. Larus marinus Lestris cataractes pomarina Buffonii paradisea Sterna cayana anglica hirundo arctica minuta nigra fuliginosa stolida Rhynchops nigra PALMAT. PELECANI. Sula bassana fusca Plotus melanogaster Heliornis surinamensis Phaeton ezthereus LAMELLIROSTRES. Cygnus musicus Anser hyperboreus albifrons segetum canadensis leucopsis bernicla Anas nigra glacialis fusca perspicillata histrionica Stelleri clangula albeola mollissima spectabilis ferina Anas valisneriz marila fuligula labradora rubida clypeata acuta boschas sponsa strepera americana obscura crecca discors Mergus merganser serrator cucullatus albellus EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES. Plate I. The Quadrupeds of this plate are sufliciently de- scribed in the text, for which refer to the genera by the Index. Plate II. This plate exhibits the osteology of the head of two anomalous Mammalia. Fig. 1, 2,3... The Aye-Aye (Cheiromys, C.), which, with the teeth of the Rodentia, possesses a head very similar to that of the Quadrumana, and principally as relates to the zygomatic arch, the orbit, &c. Fig. 4, 5,6. The Phascolomys, which also has the teeth of the Rodentia united to a head very analogous to that of the Carnaria, and evidently closely allied to that of the Phalangers. Plates II and IV. The Birds of this plate are sufliciently described in the text under their respective genera. VoL. l.—3 G ; Peitete Pt “ii etene Me * ‘i + ‘ s ee 4 ; , . . a ; fie, ea a : ma ' ; | Be ser ehen fi gd? een eae q, a7 svi Hole r ‘ >! ut a2 " P - ~ " he “ ’ , 7% . , ad ; ) an (nate 8 aoe ytd c.. Bellarine z ‘inhib 4: oR ; ay a) “heen We let res iva 4 | ae | : ae ; or 4 , ene et wo “— ’ rhe « Per - ‘ * ip. : * a e ry ‘itt le i- sl F 7 slow ‘ ae ; LU : oh : } “a he on ares i pe. * ke ad - 7 : at : “aise wi it , 4 7 2 a mite gi ry road a . 7 Ae ‘ he: ‘ ‘2 f KA a 2 Ghote SLES j j ar eee an @ ag Rey % vp “7, <4 tS Ba, do \ kn re A INCH. Og. tae ee ay Soy rf 2 yn *%, NOLAN 01506 4801