at Poe ne ~~ hake d testa eee - Se Pine | 6S, ~ e a ' J i j i ‘ ” ys ee mats oe : 7 7 ‘ : ‘ - is “ae % THE ANNALS AND MAGAZINE OF NATURAL HISTORY, INCLUDING ZOOLOGY, BOTANY, ann GEOLOGY. (BEING A CONTINUATION OF THE ‘ANNALS’ COMBINED WITH LOUDON AND CHARLESWORTH’S ‘MAGAZINE OF NATURAL HISTORY. ) CONDUCTED BY P. J. SELBY, Esq., F.L.S., GEORGE JOHNSTON, M.D., CHARLES C. BABINGTON, Ese., M.A., F.RB.S., F.L.S., F.G.S., J. H. BALFOUR, M.D., Prof. Bot. Edinburgh, AND VOL. XIV.—SECOND SERIES. —ew LONDON: PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY TAYLOR AND FRANCIS. SOLD BY LONGMAN, BROWN, GREEN, AND LONGMANS, S. HIGHLEY; SIMPKIN, MARSHALL, AND CO.; PIPER AND CO.; W. WOOD, TAVISTOCK STREET ; BAILLIERE, REGENT STREET, AND PARIS: LIZARS, AND MACLACHLAN AND STEWART, EDINBURGH : CURRY, DUBLIN: AND ASHER, BERLIN. 1854. ‘*Omnes res create sunt divine sapientie et potentie testes, divitie felicitatis humane :—ex harum usu bonitas Creatoris; ex pulchritudine sapientia Domini; ex ceconomia in conservatione, proportione, renovatione, potentia majestatis elucet. Earum itaque indagatio ab hominibus sibi relictis semper estimata; a veré eruditis et sapientibus semper exculta; malé doctis et barbaris semper inimica fuit.”— LINNZUS. ‘* Quelque soit le principe de la vie animale, il ne faut qu’ouvrir les yeux pour voir qu'elle est le chef-d’ceuvre de la Toute-puissance, et le but auquel se rapportent toutes ses opérations.”—BRUCKNER, Théorie du Systeme Animal, Leyden, 1767. oot eo ee be we « he SYlVan powers Obey our summons ; from their deepest dells The Dryads come, and throw their garlands wild And odorous branches at our feet ; the Nymphs That press with nimble step the mountain thyme And purple heath-flower come not empty-handed, But scatter round ten thousand forms minute Of velvet moss or lichen, torn from rock Or rifted oak or cavern deep: the Naiads too Quit their loved native stream, from whose smooth face They crop the lily, and each sedge and rush \ That drinks the rippling tide: the frozen poles, Where peril waits the bold adventurer’s tread, The burning sands of Borneo and Cayenne, All, all to us unlock their secret stores And pay their cheerful tribute. J. Taytor, Norwich, 1818. CONTENTS OF VOL. XIV. [SECOND SERIES.] - NUMBER LXXIX. Page I. On the Genus Lycium. By Joun Miers, Esq., F.R.S., F.L.S. WORE ca scvppayte Dubbs enesbs tse hhinagedssdsns shnenebduauness simnts haeas seas tees 1 II. Additions and Corrections to the Arrangement of the Families of Bivalve Shells. By J. E. Gray, Ph.D., F.R.S., V.P.Z.S. &e. 21 III. Supplement to a Catalogue of British Spiders, including re- marks on their Structure, Functions, iconomy and Systematic Ar- rangement. By JoHn BLackwaLt, F.L.S....... Cnegaees bash etinGecseen 20 IV. On the Mechanism of Aquatic Respiration and on the Struc- ture of the Organs of Breathing in Invertebrate Animals. By THomas WiuuiaMms, M.D. Lond.:.»:( With two Plates.) 2... lec cceee des 34 V. Notes on the Ornithology of Ceylon, collected during an eight years’ residence in the Island. By EpGar Leorpoip Layarp, F.Z.S., C. MEER, BEG ics tiie alias aspire tacbsavauvusts cpatesceiuas cancer iiveveees 57 VI. On Manufactured Sea Water for the Aquarium. By P. H. Gowen ALi Gy: iccpprtenscesah 00550 suas BHe iE atmo ble ces veehside was G5 Proceedings of the Royal Society ; Zoological Society ; Royal Insti- eR a ee ld cua dew cc aps 67—74 On the Formation of the Stomata in the Epidermis of the Leaves of the Spiderwort (Tradescantia virginica), and on the Evolution of the Cells in their neighbourhood, by Dr. Garreau ; Description of anew Genus of Bivalve Mollusea, by H. and A. Adams; On the Dimorphism of the Uredinee, by M.Tulasne; Meteorolo- gical Observations and Table ....Mgi5 Ui... ccccevcsceccscerscecees 75—80 NUMBER LXXX. VII. Researches on the Development of Viviparous Aphides. By WALDO: Fo BROS, MD. Boston ecciccisicicsccessvcocoecsscoerysssdesi 81 VIII. On the true position of the Canaliferous Structure in the iV CONTENTS, * Page Shell of Fossil Alveolina (D’Orbigny). By H. J. Carrsr, Esq., Assistant Surgeon, Bombay Establishment. (With a Plate.) ......... 99 IX. Notice of some new species of British Nudibranchiata. By — JOSHUA ALDER and ALBANY HANCOCK (s........cccccsscscecesccacseeere 102 X. Notes on the Ornithology of Ceylon, collected during an eight years’ residence in the Island. By EpGar Lreopo.tp Layarp, F.Z.S., CO SE ithe CUB. Sic econeccsaccghiuhes euachaeat aa mneebiy Waate cl bedskee sda vevedasss 105 XI. On some new Cretaceous Crustacea. By Frepericx M‘Coy, F.G.S., Hon. F.C.P.S., Professor of Natural Science in the University of Melbourne, late Professor of Geology and Mineralogy in the Queen’s University of Ireland., (With a Plate.) | .ssccsesecsesssencenseqenesecnny ose 116 XII. On the Aclis unica, Auct. By WiLuIAM CLARK, Esq. ...... 122 XIII. On some Arctic species of Calanide. By Joun Lussock, Kaq., F.Z.S. "CWT @ PIabe.) : cessshiicctoaesahistestisisssnseceececnetbecsese 125 XIV. Description of a new Genus and Species of British Curcu- lionide. By T. VERNON WOLLASTON, M.A., FLAS. ....c0csecseseneee 129 XV. On the Genus Lycium. By Joun Mizrs, Esq.,.F-R.S., FLAS. Ge. cseeseceeensessseeeeeseneneceeeeaseersanaracatteateeespeneneeseentees 131 XVI. Note on the supposed Antheridia of Rhamnus. By J. 'S. BurDON SanpERSON, M.D. (With a Plate.) ......ccee icc ce eee es 141 Proceedings of the Zoological Society; Botanical Society of Edin- burgh seeetes PO See Se Sere eseneeFEHESERseeag PORES e Teo aes eeesereseesaes ese 145—155 On the Embryogeny and Propagation of Intestinal Worms, by MM. Ercolani and Vella; On two new species of South American Birds, by Philip Lutley Sclater; Description of a new species of Hyraxv from Fernando Po, by Louis Fraser, H.M. Consul at Whidah; Meteorological Observations and Table. ......... 156—160 NUMBER LXXXI. XVII. On the Occurrence of ‘‘ Cinchonaceous Glands” in Galiacee, and on the Relations of that Order to Cinchonacee. By GrorGE Lawson, F.R.P.S., F.B.S.E., Demonstrator of Botany and Vegetable Histology to the University of Edinburgh. (With a Plate.) ......... 161 XVIII. Miscellaneous Notes on the Fauna of Dacca, including Remarks made on the line of march from Barrackpore to that Station. By Capt. Ropert C. TyT.er, of the 38th Regiment Bengal Native Light Infantry..........-.ssseeees ebarakaneens Mia gegnalesaaacgeeteosasececes ss 168 XIX. A Reply to some Statements of Dr. Williams on the contro- versy respecting the Branchial Currents in the Lamellibranchiata. By JOSHUA ALDER, Esq. oo. ssveecrslesss has we heed sear ben tedte oag hipens 177 CONTENTS. Vv Page XX. On the Genus Lycium. By Joun Miers, Esq., F.R.S., Bs.) Beech < With these plants I am wholly unacquainted, but from the descriptions quoted, no specific difference is perceptible between them, as was suggested by M. Dunal himself. 22. Lycium pendulinum (n. sp.) ;—ramosum, ramulis gracilibus, pendulinis, annotinis strumoso-nodosis, subnudis, apice spi- nosis, junioribus foliosis, foliis e cupula ossea axillari fascicu- latis, linearibus, acutis, in petiolum tenuem imo angustatis, eveniis, glaberrimis ; flore e fasciculo solitario, pedunculo gra- cili, calyce 4plo longiore, calyce tubuloso, breviter ac sube- qualiter 5-dentato, corolla infundibuliformi, imo intra calycem coarctata, et extus pilosa, superne glaberrima, limbi laciniis oblongis, venosis, tubo 4plo longioribus, staminibus ineequa- libus, uno longiore exserto, 2 faucem attingentibus, 2 brevi- oribus inclusis: filamentis supra coarctationem tubi insertis, hine nudis et geniculatis, mox fasciculo globoso pilorum mu- nitis, superne glabris ; stylo filiformi, exserto.—C. B. S.—~. s. in herb. Hook. sub nom. L. Afrum var. pendulum, N. ab E. This plant accords more with L. tenue, Dun., than with L. tenue, Willd.; its branches are very slender and pendulous: the leaves are 4or 5 lines long, 3 line broad; the peduncle is 3 lines long ; the tubular calyx 2 lines, with five short erect teeth ; the corolla is 3 lines long, and the oval segments of its border 4 to 4 of its lengtht. * This species with sectional drawings is seen (Joc. cit.), plate 67 A. + This plant with floral details is shown (loc. cit.), plate 67 B. [To be continued. | “4 ' Dr. J. E. Gray on some Families of Bivalve Shells. 21 II.— Additions and Corrections to the Arrangement of the Families of Bivalve Shells. By J, E. Gray, Ph.D., F.R.S., V.P.Z.S. - &e. _ One of the advantages, and not the least, of preparing and pub- lishing a revision of the state of our knowledge on any special subject, such as the animals of Bivalve shells, are the additions to that knowledge which its publication induces. During the time my former paper was in the press and since its publication, I have had an opportunity of looking over more than a thousand ‘moiluscous animals, and of examining the animals of more than fifty species of Bivalves belonging to nearly as many genera, some of them not before observed, which has rendered it neces- sary to make several corrections and important additions to my former communication. | | : There must be added to the family Veneride the genus Cypri- cardia of Lamarck and its subdivisions: all these animals have two short separate siphons and a small pedal opening. I have examined the animal of Trapezium angulatum. ~ Mittré has described the animal of what he calls Coralliophaga dactyla, but M. Petit informs us that the shell intended is the Car- dita Lithophagella of Lamarck found in the Mediterranean, and not the Cypricardia Coralliophaga of that author, which is only found in the West Indies. This animal greatly resembles that -of Trapezium angulatum, and should be the type of a new genus which may be called Lithophagella. The Cypricardia vellicata and Coralliophaga oblonga have similar animals, but all these genera require revision. 7 In the Revision, vol. xiii. p.410, I placed Astartede in the order Veneracea, because Prof. E. Forbes in the ‘ British Mollusca,’ i. 451, described the animal of the genus as having “ the mantle freely open with plain margins; slightly united posteriorly at two points, 8o-as to form two siphonal orifices with simple edges,” and at pl. M. fig. 5. figures the animal of Astarte sulcata with two siphonal apertures; at p. 455, he further observes on this species, “the siphonal openings are quite sessile, and but slightly separated from each other ;” and at p. 466, he states that the animal of A. compressa has “ sessile siphonal orifices.” _ I was aware that Philippi (Wiegmann’s Archiv, 18389, 125, copied Ann, and Mag, Nat, Hist. vol. iv. p. 297) had described the animal as like Cardita, with only a single anal opening, but placed more faith in the latter description. I have however had an opportunity of examining the animal of Astarte striata from Greenland, which appears to be the same as the A. compressa of the ‘ British Mollusca,’ and find the description of Philippi cor- 22 Dr. J. E. Gray on some Families of Bivalve Shells. rect, and that it has only a single opening like Crassatella and Cardita. The family must, therefore, be removed to the order Unionacea, between Carditida and Cr assatellada, differing chiefly from the latter in the external position of the cartilage. Most probably, when the animal of Astarte is alive, the hinder portion of the mantle near the anaJ aperture forms a siphon-like aperture, as is the case in Crenella and in many of the other Lucinacea. It has been suggested that perhaps the leaves of the mantle are united together and form a siphonal aperture when the animal is alive, but separate when the specimen has been kept in spirits; however, there is not the slightest appearance of any such union on the surface of the mantle, and it certainly is not the case with Crenella, Mytilus, Unio, Anodon, and other animals which are without a branchial siphon, and which have an imper- fect siphonal aperture for the entrance of the water to the gills. Carpitipa. This family may be thus divided — A. The elongate hinder cardinal tooth in left valve single, trigonal, upper lamina of it rudimentary or quite wanting. Shell strongly costate, cordate or ovate. eal Venericardia. Shell short, cordate, hinder cardinal tooth triangular. V. australis, V. gar. 2. Cardita. Shell elongate, ovate, hinder facial tooth elon- gate. C. antiquata. B. The elongate hinder cardinal tooth in left valve double, both lamine equally developed, elongate. Shell elongate, oblong. 3. Mytilicardia. Shell oblong, strongly costate ; front hinge- tooth triangular, diverging; anterior haben none. Jeson, M. concamerata. 4, Lazaria. Shell oblong, strongly ooatabe front hinge-tooth compressed, anterior lateral tooth distinct. L. Pectineus, L. ra- diata, ~ 5. Azarella. Shell Liesl compressed, dilated behind, striated; front hinge-tooth elongate, compressed, similar and parallel to hinder; lateral teeth non:. A. semiorbiculata, A. gu- bernaculum. | In Astartide I inserted “ Cypricardia sp. according to D’Or- bigny ;” this was a mistake for Cardita sp. M. D’Orbigny both describes and figures Cardita spurca, t. 82. f. 18, as having two distinct siphonal apertures. I have not been able to see the animal of this shell. M. Quoy describes the animal of Veneri- cardia australis. Deshayes figured the animal of Cardita caly- culata as having only a single anal siphonal opening, and this is the case with the animal of the several species of Cardita Dr. J. E. Gray on some Families of Bivalve Shells. 23 I have examined; but if there is not some mistake in M. D’Orbigny’s description and figure of Cardita spurca, it must: be a distinct genus ; however, perhaps he has been misled by the hinder part of the mantle being expanded behind during life, so as to represent a second siphon, which is only a false appear- ance. Tellinide.—The genera Sanguinolaria and Soletellina, which have been referred to Solenide; Fragilia and Capsa, arranged with Veneride, should be referred to this family ; they have, like them, two elongated separate siphons, with large distinct fan-shaped retractile muscles, and the gills not produced into the siphons. Anatinide. —In the May Number of the ‘Annals’ (p. 413), I referred the genus Mytilimera of Conrad to the family Modio- larcade with doubt. In an examination which I have been enabled to make of typical specimens of Mytilimera Nuttall, I think I have discovered the mark left by the shelly plate over the large subinternal cartilage; and on comparing it with Anatina cuneata, I have as little doubt as one can have from the exami- nation of shells alone (especially in an imperfect condition), that they belong to the same genus and the family Anatinide. As Mytilimera was published before the Byssonia of Valenciennes, it ought to be retained for these shells. They both have the habit of living imbedded,—Byssonia cuneata in Ascidia, and Mytilimera in sponges. _ Mutelade.—In Mutela the lips are very large, semioval, at- tached by the straight side without the free Rann existing in Unio and Anodon. Cardiade.—The gills are united together heling the body or base of the foot. Solenide. This family may be thus divided :— A. Cardinal teeth 1-1. Stphons produced, united ; siphonal muscles moderate ; siphonal inflection deep, truncated. 1. Solen. Shell truncated in front ; umbo anterior; anterior . adductor muscle elongate, horizontal. S. marginatus. 2. Hypogella. Shell rounded at each end ; umbo subanterior ; anterior adductor muscle round. H. ambigua, H. vaginata. B. Cardinal teeth 2°3. Shell rounded at each end. a. Siphons moderate, separate ; stphonal muscles small ; siphonal inflection small, truncated. 3. Ensis. Siphons not produced, separate ; umbo anterior ; anterior adductor muscle elongate, horizontal. EH. Ensis. > 24 Dr.J. E, Gray on some Families of Bivalve Shells. 4. Pharella. Siphons shortly produced, separate ; umbo sub- anteriot ; anterior adductor muscle elongate, subtrigonal ; shell subcylindrical. P. javanica, P. Michaudi, P. acutidens. 5. Pharus. Siphons produced, separate ; shell compressed ; umbo subcentral ; anterior adductor muscle elongate, horizontal ; umbonal ribs rudimentary. P. legumen. ; 6. Cultellus. Siphous ? anterior adductor muscle rounded, hinder triangular; shell compressed; umbo subanterior. C. lacteus. " | b. Stphons much produced, large, united, covered with a thick periostraca ; retractor siphonal muscles small; siphonal in-— | flection very small. ) ier ‘ 7. Cyrtodaria. Anterior adductor muscle elongate ; umbo sub- posterior. C. glycimeris. c. Siphons elongate, with large fan-shaped retractor muscles ; _~ stphonal inflection deep, rounded. * Siphons very large, united, covered with a hard periostraca. Shell compressed. Hinge-teeth 3 * 3, compressed. 8. Siliqua. *k Siphons large, united at the base, covered with a hard perios- traca. Shell subcylindrical. Hinder teeth conic. 9. Glycimeris. 10. Adacna. *KK Siphuns very large, united at the base, upper part free, ringed. 11. Macha. Shell obliquely sulcated. MM. strigillatus. 12. Azor. Shell smooth. A. antiquatus. - seek Siphons elongated, cylindrical. 13. Tagelus. * Umbo submedial; siphonal inflection very deep, beyond the umbo. Tf. viridieneus. T. Carabeus. ** Novaculina. Umbo subposterior ; siphonal inflection deep, ‘not reaching the umbo. YT. Novaculina, India. T. Dombei, Peru. 7. fragilis, Burope. T. constrictus, China. Elizia.— Animal unknown. Shell suborbicular, oblong, equi- valved, compressed, thin, covered with a hard shining periostraca ; umbo not prominent, subanterior. Cardinal teeth oblique, in right valve two, hinder bifid elongate, in left valve three, central bifid. Pallial impression submarginal. Siphonal inflection deep, oblong, rather contracted at the outer edge, descending from the upper part of the hinder margin to the centre of the disk. Elizia orbiculata= Solen orbiculatus, Gray in Wood Cat. Sup- plement, t. 1. f. 4. é Dr. J. E. Gray on some Families of Bivalve Shells. i) Lucinide—As our knowledge of the animals of Univalve shells has ‘increased, we have found that shells which have a great resemblance to each other are formed by very different animals, until it has become almost impossible to pronounce with certainty on the genera of several Gasteropodous Mollusks, unless we are in possession of the animal and operculum as well as the shell. The same fact is every day forcing itself on our notice with respect to the Bivalves. It is nearly impos- sible to separate the Mutelade from the Uniones, the Modiolarce from the Modiole, though the animals are very unlike. : All conchologists considered that the Lucinide were a very » * natural group, yet we learn that Unguline of Daudin, which are scarcely to be separated from them, except by their irregular out- line from living in holes in rocks, have four gills and distinct labial palpi, while the Lucine have only two gills and no labial palpi. _ This appeared so improbable when I printed my paper in the - May Number of the'‘ Annals,’ that I placed a mark of doubt after the description, but I have since had an opportunity of verifying the accuracy of the observations. | One of the most striking instances occurs in the shell referred to the genus Mysia, or Diplodonta. In the paper above referred to I described the animal of a Philippine species of this genus, which has two siphonal apertures and a lanceolate foot, and referred it to the suborder Veneracea. M. Mittré in ‘Journ. de Conchyliologie,’ 1850, t. 238, described and figured the animal of a Brazilian species, which he calls Diplodonta Brasiliensis, having only a single anal siphonal aperture and a cylindrical foot like the Unguline ; and which, indeed, appears chiefly to differ from that genus in the anal aperture being further from the pedal one, and in the adductor muscle being roundish in- stead of linear and elongate: the difference in form of this part probably explains the relative position of these two apertures. - The examination of the animal of Ungulina, and M. Mittré’s description and figure, show the necessity of forming for these genera, as recommended by M. Mittré, a family, which may be called Ungulinade, characterized by the single anal siphonal aper- ture, and the presence of two pairs of gills and distinct labial tentacles, which will contain the genera, 1. Ungulina, Lamk., 2. Scacchia of Philippi, and 3. a new genus which may be called Mirrrea, having Diplodonta ‘Brasiliensis for its type. One of our English shells, Tellina rotundata, Montague, has been referred to the genus Diplodonta, but I have not been able to ex- amine its animal, and according to the description of Mr. Clark, quoted by Messrs. Forbes and Hanley, it differs essentially from any of the preceding: ‘the mantle plain, somewhat closed pos- teriorly and anteriorly, but with a large opening for the foot in 26 =©©Dr. J. E. Gray on some Families of Bivalve Shells. the centre of the: ventral range: no siphonal process is to be found, not even an orifice, except the pedal one.” —Brit. Moll. ii, 67. Should any of your readers have a specimen of this ani- mal, I should be happy to have the opportunity of examining it ; and also of the animals, of any of our species of Lucine, I may further remark, that the species of the genus Diplodonta have been confused with. the Cyrenelle, but the latter may be | known by a careful examination of the teeth of the hinge, and the animal differs in having two siphons. . If M. Mittré’s description of the animal of Venus diaphana, on which Recluz has formed his genus Felania, is correct, it will also have to be referred to the Ungulinide. While on the subject, I may state, that the genus Myllita of D’Orbigny and Recluz, ‘Journ. de Conch.’ 1850, 88. t. 11. f, 12-14, is the same as Pythina of Hinds, 1844, Voy. Sulph. 70, and I believe established on the same species. Etheriade.—The lips are very large, semioval, and attached by the straight side without any free point, as in Mutela. Thereisin fact no distinct muscular foot in the adult specimens. The body containing the liver projects into the cavity of the mantle, and has been described by Rang as a foot. The foot may be pre- sent in the young state before the shell is attached. Through the kindness of M. D’Orbigny, who has sent me the original specimen of his genus Acostea, I am enabled to state that it is identical with the Mulleria of Férussac and Sowerby, and it appears to be the American form of this family. Mytilade.—The pedal opening of Crenella i is small, forming the hinder half or third of the basal margin. Mauueacea should be iided into three families :-— 1..-Pimnade. Mislead by Rang (Manual Moll. 292), this family was erroneously referred to Mytilacea. Anterior adductor muscle well developed. Gills narrow, very much produced behind, free from each other and the mantle, but fitting against a fold on its inner surface. Rectum with a long tubular prices at its base. Vent medial. Pinna. 2. Ptertade. Anterior adductor muscle none. Gills narrow, much produced behind, free from each other and the mantle, but fitting against a fold on its inner surface. Rectum simple. a. Avicula, Meleagris, Malleus, and Perna. 8. Crenatula. In Avicula the hinder pedal muscle is separate from and in front of the large adductor muscle, with a separate scar; in Me- leagrina it is close to and forms part of the large scar. There are some other small scars, two in front and one behind the cir- Dr. J. E. Gray on some Families of Bivalve Shells. 27 cular central scar, formed by the ligaments of the muscles which suspend the mantle and wills. 3. Vulsellide. Anterior adductor muscle none. Gills narrow, much produced behind, united together and to the inner surface of the mantle, dividing the mantle-cavity into two parts. Rec- tum simple. Vudlsella. In all these families the body forms a single mass, the tube of the rectum passes over the back of the adductor muscle, the vent being free and medial. Osrrerna. Add, vent medial, free ; the body forms a single cen- tral mass. Ostreide. Gills united together and to the imner edge of the mantle. Shell, hinge toothless. Plicatulide. Gulls free behind and free from the mantle, sus- pended from the body by a membrane. Shell, hinge with two diverging cross-grooved cardinal teeth. The genus Plicatula, which has been hitherto placed. with Spondylus, should be removed to the tribe Ostreina and formed - Into a separate family, as the animal has no appearance of any foot, which is so peculiar in the former genus, The animal is very like Ostrea, has four equal suspended gills united together, acute, and produced beyond the lower side of the adductor muscle. Lips four, rather small, united together above the rather large mouth. The shell is attached ‘by the outer sur- face of the left valve, and the hinge is furnished with two diver- ging teeth, with the cartilages in a triangular pit between their base. ANOoMIAINA. Foot are small, truncated at the end ; ovaries separated from the mass of the body and attached to the inner sur- face of the right leaf of the mantle. Vent nearer to or attached to the right leaf of the mantle. Gills united together behind, suspended by membranes to the inner side of the mantle. Anomiade. Animal attached, rather distorted; foot on the right-side of the body, with a very large byssal pore at the base ; byssus horny or stony, formed of parallel laminz, emitted through a notch in the right valve of the shell. Pedal muscles large, leaving two or three large scars on the left valve. The byssus, or plug, is placed in exactly the same situation in the animal as the beard or byssus of Mytilus, Pmna, &c., and the animal is only rather distorted by being more closely attached to the marine body than in those genera. It shows that what is called the foot of the Arcs is in fact an enlargement and production of this byssus-forming organ, while the real foot is-greatly reduced. 28 Mr.J. Blackwall on the Structure, Functions, Giconomy, Placentade. Animal free. Foot cylindrical, compressed, me- dial, without any byssal pore. Vent attached to the right leaf of the mantle. Pedal muscle small, leaving.a small round scar be- tween the diverging cardinal plates. - This family must be removed to the tribe of Anomiaina, having a distinct foot. The mantle leaves free, margin closely bearded. Foot when contracted in spirits compressed, elongate, larger at the end, truncated, and with a deep linear cavity at the end, apparently produced by the withdrawing of the tip, probably cylindrical, and much elongated and produced when alive. Gills suspended, occupying the front and lower edge. Anus tubular, conical, elongate at the hinder “basal margin, at- tached to the inner side of the right mantle leaf. Lips elongate, attached by their hinder edge. Body surrounding the cardinal ribs and cartilages. Pectenide.—The foot of Pedum is elongate, cylindrical, clavate, rather enlarged and rounded at the tip, without any appearance of a byssal groove. II1.—Supplement to a Catalogue of British Spiders, including remarks on their Structure, Functions, Giconomy and Systematic Arrangement. By Joun Biacxwatt, F.L.S. [Continued from vol. xi. p. 120.] _ Tribe OCTONOCULINA. Family Sauricipa. Genus Salticus, Latr. Arrer Salticus notatus in the supplement to the catalogue (Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist. Second Series, vol. xi. p. 114) add : | : - Salticus promptus. Salticus promptus, Blackw. Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist. Second Series, vol. xui. p. 173. In October 1853, an immature female of this species, which is nearly allied to Salticus frontals and Salticus reticulatus, was received from the Rev. Hamlet Clark, who took it near North- ampton in the autumn of the same year. : After Salticus reticulatus in the supplement to the catalogue (Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist. Second Series, vol. x1. p. 114) add : | and Systematic Arrangement of British Spiders. 29° Salticus Jenynsii. Salticus Jenynsii, Blackw. Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist. Second Series, vol. xiii. p..174. | This addition to our indigenous Saltict has been made through the liberality of the Rev. Leonard Jenyns, M.A., F.L.S., from whom it was received in February 1853, together with numerous specimens of spiders which had been captured in Cambridgeshire. Family THomisipa&. Genus Thomisus, Walck. After Thomisus cristaius in the catalogue (Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist. Second Series, vol. vil. p. 448) add : Thomisus audaz. Aysticus audax, Koch, Uebers. des Arachn. Syst. erstes Heft, p. 25 ; Koch, Die Arachn. B. xii. p. 74. tab. 413. fig. 1005-1008. Specimens of Thomisus audax, supplied by the Rev. Hamlet Clark, were met with near Northampton and at Holme Fen, Huntingdonshire, in the autumn of 1853. They were all females. M. Walckenaer, regarding the Xysticus (Thomisus) audax of M. Koch asa mere variety of Thomisus cristatus, has included. it among the synonyma of that species (Hist. Nat. des Insect. Apt. - t.i.p.521), from which, however, it is undoubtedly distinct. After Thomisus formosus in the catalogue (Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist. Second Series, vol. vil. p. 450) add ‘Thomisus floricolens. Thomisus floricolens, Walck. Hist. Nat. des Insect. Apt. t. i. p. 532. Thomisus dorsatus, Hahn, Die Arachn. B. 1. p. 44. tab. 11. fig. 34; ‘Koch, Uebers. des Arachn. Syst. erstes Heft, p. 24; Koch, Die % Arachn. B. xii. p. 56. tab. 410. fig. 991, 992; Sund. Vet. Acad. Handl. 1832, p. 221. : For this addition to our indigenous spiders I am indebted to Mr. R. H. Meade, who transmitted to me, in December 1853, adult males and immature females of Thomisus floricolens which had been captured by Mr. Francis Walker in that and the pre- ceding year at Piercefield, near Chepstow, in Monmouthshire. Family Drassip&. _ Genus Drassus, Walck. After Drassus cupreus in the catalogue (Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist. Second Series, vol. viii. p. 41) add 30 Mr. J. Blackwall on the Structure, Functions, Economy, Drassus lapidicolens. Drassus lapidicola, Koch, Uebers. des Arachn. Syst. erstes Heft, p. 18 ; Koch, Die Arachn. B. vi. p. 28. tab. 188. (misnumbered.187 in the text) fig. 450, 451. Clubiona lapidicolens, Walck. Hist. Nat. des Insect. Apt. t.i. p. 598; Walck. Hist. Nat. des Insect. Apt. t. ii. p. 479. Clubiona lapidicola, Latr. Gen. Crust. et Insect..tom. i. ; Sund. Vet. Acad. Hand]. 1831, Be 139; Hahn, Die Dencleni 3. il. 'p..9. tab. 40. fig. 100. , An adult male of this species, oe was first recorded as British by Dr. Leach (see the Supplement to the 4th, 5th, and 6th editions of the ‘ Encyclopedia Britannica,’ article Annulosa), has been transmitted to me by the Rev. Hamlet Clark. An examination of this specithen, which was found near Northampton in the autumn of 1853, and had recently changed its integument, has served to convince me that M. Koch has assigned to this spider its appropriate situation in a systematic arrangement of the Araneidea by transferring it from the genus Clubiona to that of Drassus, as by the figure and disposition of its eyes and the structure of its oral apparatus it evidently appertains to the ' latter genus. After Drassus nitens in the catalogue (Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist. Second Series, vol. viii. p. 42) add Drassus propinquus. Drassus propinquus, Blackw. Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist. Second Series, vol. xiii. p. 175. Two adult males of Drassus propinquus, whichil is closel¥ allied to Drassus nitens, were captured in the spring of 1853; one running on a public road near Llanrwst, and the other 4 ina window of the sitting-room at Oakland. In the summer of the same year Mr. R. H. Meade took an adult male of this pene ; in Norfolk. Genus Clubiona, Latr. After Clubiona comta in the catalogue (Annals and Mas of Nat. Hist. Second Series, vol. viii. p. 44) add Clubiona pallens. Clubiona pallens, Koch, Die Arachn. B. vi. p- 19. tab. 185. fig. 443, 444, Three adult females. and an adult male of Clubiona pallens were received in October 1853 from the Rev. Hamlet Clark, who informs me that they were taken at Holme Fen, in Hun- tingdonshire, about the middle of September in the same year. I have not included the Clubiona pallens of M. Hahn (Die s and Systematic Arrangement of British Spiders. 51 Arachn. B. ii. p. 10. tab. 40. fig. 101) among the synonyma of the above species, as there appears to be much uncertainty about its identity. M.Walckenaer has added the Clubiona pallens of M. Koch to the synonyma of Clubiona amarantha (Hist. Nat. des Insect. Apt. t. i. p. 478), supposing it to be the latter species in an immature state, for he remarks that “c’est une jeune que M. Koch a décrite;” this, however, is a mistake, as it is a- smaller and perfectly distinct species, and M. Koch’s figure of the male clearly represents an individual with the palpal organs fully developed. é Genus Argyroneta, Latr. Argyroneta aquatica. To the remarks on this species given in the catalogue (Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist. Second Series, vol. viii. p. 97) the fol- lowing particulars relative to its ceconomy may be added. In May the female deposits from 80 to 100 spherical eggs of a yellow colour, not agglutinated together, in a lenticular cocoon of white silk of a compact texture measuring ird of an inch in diameter... | Family THEerrpiip2. Genus Theridion, Walck. After Theridion nervosum in the catalogue (Annals and. Mag. of Nat. Hist, Second Series, vol. viii. p. 442) add ' * Theridion pictum. Theridion pictum, Walck. Hist. Nat. des Insect. Apt. t. ii. p. 304; Walck. Hist. Nat. des Insect. Apt. t. iv. p. 489; Hahn, Die . Arachn. B. i. p. 90. tab. 22. fig. 68. Steatoda pictum, Koch, Uebers. des Arachn. Syst. erstes Heft, p. 9. Theridium pictum, Koch, Die Arachn. B. xii. p. 139. tab. 429. fig. 1062, 1063. | Two adult females of this handsome Theridion were received from the Rev. Hamlet Clark im October 1853. Both specimens were captured at Richmond in the autumn of the same year by Mr. George Guyon. Family Linypuiip2. Genus Linyphia, Latr. _ After Linyphia gracilis in the catalogue (Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist. Second Series, vol. ix. p. 19) add the following species. Linyphia tenella. Linyphia tenella, Blackw. Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist. Second Series, vol. xiii. p. 177. An adult female of this Linyphia was received from Mr. R. 82 MrJ . Blackwall on the. Structure, Functions, (Economy, H.,Meadein September, and an, narcotics one a: frm ite oa Maral folaah in stale: 1853... “'Linyphia soa Reda ig Linyphia circumspecta, Blackw,. panel and MAb of. Nat Hist. Second Series, vol. xiil. P- i a a me ; In the autumn of 1853, males ot thin. species, peta ‘the ‘palpal organs fully developed, were Hacomared among i ‘growing in woods about Oakland. — Linyphia flavipes. Linyphia flavipes,. Blackw. Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist. Second +...) Series, vol. xiii. p. 178. Adult males of Linyphia flavipes were fourid among moss im woods at allend q an the summer of 1853.0.) soa) al in + fe ta! : inked Y re Genus Neriéne,. Blackw.t 5. curt. aheatd ot "After Neriéne sulcata in the catalogue niet and king Nat. Hist.. Second, Beieee vol. ix. p. 271) ata mk walkA * Neriénd herbigrada. Neriéne herbigrada, Blackw.Annals:and Mag. of Nat. Hist, Second Series, vol. ‘xui. p. 179. bo BGS Barly i in October 1853 both sexes of ‘Nestine obi gneall, in a mature state, were detected among coarse: herbage..and moss growing in woods on the northern slope of Gallty Rhygi; Like Neriéne sulcata, this species makes a near >p POM AOR: to; the pPiders,2 of the genus Walckenaéra. 7 WwW ts ¥) Neriéne dubia. - oa. following fact. may. be added to the remarks on riibincs polis in ‘the catalogue (Annals and Mag..of Nat. Hist., Second, Series, vol. ix. p. 272). An adult male was taken by Mr. Francis Walker ‘at Piercefield, in Monmouthshire, in the summer of 1853, and was transmitted to me by Mr. R. H. Meade. Family Epiéiripz. 3 .» Genus Epéira, Walck. hier: Ppeeia umbratica in the catalogue (Annals and Mig. of Nat. Hist. Second Series, vol. x: ps os add: " Epira agalenas: Epéira agalena, Walck. Hist. Nat. des Insect. Apt. t. ii. p. 36. Epéira Sturmu, Hahn, Die Arachn. B,J. p.ol2. tab. 3.:fig 8. and Systematic Arrangement of British Spiders. 33 Atea agalena, Koch, Die Arachn. B. xi. p. 137. tab. 391. fig. 936- 938 (the specific name hyalina is incorrectly connected with the numbers 936, 937 in the plate, but this error is rectified in the text). In the month of June this Epéira may be found in a state of maturity on trees and bushes in the woods about Oakland. After Epéira ornata in the catalogue (Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist. Second Series, vol. x. p. 185) add : Epéira ceropegia. Eptira ceropegia, Walck. Hist. Nat. des Insect. Apt. tvii. p. 51. Epéira sclopetaria, Hahn, Die Arachn. B. ii. p. 46. tab. 57. fig. 131. Miranda ceropegia, Koch, Uebers. des Arachn. Syst. erstes Heft, p- 4; Koch, Die Arachn. B. v. p. 51. tab. 158. fig. 370. Mr. Francis Walker captured an adult male of this species at Piercefield in the autumn of 1853, and forwarded it to Mr. R. H. Meade, from whom I received it in December in the same year. After Hpéira inclinata in the catalogue (Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist. Second Series, vol. x. p. 187) add Epéira albimacula. Zilla albimacula, Koch, Uebers. des Arachn. Syst. erates Heft, p. 5; Koch, Die Arachn. B. vi. p. 144. tab. 215. fig. 534, 535. In December 1853 an adult male of this species was received from Mr. R. H. Meade, which had been taken by Mr. F. Walker at Piercefield in the summer of the same year. : M. Walckenaer has placed the Zilla (Epéira) albimacula of M. Koch among the synonyma of Epéira agalena (Hist. Nat. des Insect. Apt. t. i. p. 37); but the males of these species differ in the design formed by the distribution of their colours, in the armature of their anterior legs, and in the structure of their palpal organs. After Epéira tubulosa in the catalogue (Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist. Second Series, vol. x. p. 249) add Epéira calva. _ Epéira calva, Blackw. Annals and Mag. of Nat. Hist. Second Series, vol. x. p. 99. An immature female of this interesting Epéira was received in October 1853 from the Rev. Hamlet Clark, who states that it was taken in Leicestershire. Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 2. Vol. xiv. 5 34 Dr. T. Wilhianis ‘on the Mechanism of Aquatic 1V.—On the, Mechanism of Aquatic, Respiration. and on. the Structure of the Organs, of Breathing in Invertebrate Animals. By Tuomas, Witiiams, M.D. Lond., Licentiate of the Royal College of Physicians, formerly Demonstrator on Structural Anatomy at Guy’s Hospital, and now of Swansea. [With two Plates. ] {Continued from vol. xiii. p. 312.] Mollusca. Tue Annulose and Arthropodal series conduct by a separate path across that wide space which divides the Echinodermal from the Vertebrate animal. The Molluscan subkingdom traverses the same distance by a divergent route which begins at the Bryozoon and terminates at the Cephalopod. Thesegrand inver- tebrate chains of beings unite mutually below at the Echinoderm and Bryozoon, and superiorly at the basilar link of the verte- brated series. The zootomist, having studied serially the arti- culate families, is constrained to return to the base of .the inver- tebrate cone, in order to seize the point of departure of that - independent road along which the molluscan families attain the summit. Between these groups there exist few points of inter- communication. Reciprocal affinities nowhere attract, attention. The Mollusca constitute a separate study: in varieties of form they are equalled by no other division of invertebrate animals ; in number of species they-exceed almost the limit of arithmetic ; im, diversities of structure they bewilder the anatomist; in modes of life discordantly diverse, they perplex the student of their habits, And yet a deeper insight into the, plan of the molluscan organism enables the earnest thinker to seize the clue of natural union which obtains between the countless members of this variegated group. Provided with a heart to circulate the blood, a distinct aliment- ary system, a nervous system, and its satellitic organs of sense, .a muscle-apparatus, viscera of complex organization, and a blood- fluid fibrinized and. corpusculated, they offer to the physiologist a problem by no means easy of solution. Of this composite machinery the respiratory function is the primary moving power. Without it nothing can go on. It is momentarily important. What provisions are made to insure its full and adequate performance? The terrestrial Gasteropods excluded, all mollusks respire qn the aquatic principle. They are tenants of the water. The organs of breathing in bulk and com- plexity of structure far surpass those dedicated to other offices. The bulk of blood, which at, any. given time is included within Respiration in Invertebrate Animals, ... - 35 the limits of the branchial organ, is relatively considerable. Measured by the complex magnitude of the branchiz, the inert oyster is a physiological paradox. It’ is\hard'thence to believe that muscularity and respiration are directly proportional. |The force generated by the ‘act of breathing is'expended in other directions. Cephalopods and air-breathing Gasteropods apart, the branchial structures of every known mollusk are abun- dantly ciliated. In this anatomical particular they contrast strikingly with those of the Crustacea. Both are breathers of water. In one only are cilia provided. The question impli- cating the reason of natural things lies far too deep to be fathomed by a mechanical explanation. In both the purpose to be accomplished is the same; in both the means employed are intimately similar, and yet in one instance vibratile cilia are con- stituently admitted into the mechanism, in-the other they are rejected. Biochemistry at a future «ra will elucidate these mysteries. The peripheric circulation in the Mollusca is lacunar rather than capillary. This capital fact was first established by Milne- Edwards* and Valenciennes +: these authors describe the blood as effused into the parenchyma of the body. It returns into the veins without the intervention of capillaries. The details upon which rest these general postulates will be afterwards stated. In the anatomical character of the peripheric passages, in the small proportion of fibrine in the blood, the circulating pits and the blood of the Mollusca resemble obviously the chylaqueous fluid and its containing system. | ’* Tn all mollusks, separate, specially constructed organs are con- secrated to the function of breathing. Even the Brachiopoda are not exceptional to this rule; they are pallio-branchiate. — The universal presence of complexly formed and profusely mul- tiplied respiratory organs attests the extreme value of the office which they are designed to fulfill. | , The ultimate vessels of the branchiz in all mollusks, those of Brachiopods and Tunicates ¢ excepted, occur in the form of straight * Obsérv.et Expér. sur la Cireul. chez les Mollusques.—Comptes Rendus, 1845, xx. p. 261. “Yee | + Nouv. Obsérv. sur la constit. des appareils de la Cireul. chez les Mol- lusques.—IJbid. p. 750. See also Ann. des Sc. Nat. 1845, ii. p. 289. { I regret that no recent opportunity has occurred to me to test the ‘validity of the anatomical principle expressed in the text. . For the present I assume that the ultimate blood-channels in the branchiz’ of the Tunieate mollusks reticulate (Pl. I. fig. 2. & fig. 4); that is, that the blood whieh moves at one moment. in one direction. courses at. the next.m another at right, angles with the former, the whole being on the same plane, and the circumscribed stigmata being water-passages. This assumption conform with the description of all observers from the time of Savigny. : 3* 36 aie ‘Williams on the Mechanism of Aquatic pataitel non-communicating Kibins of regular outlme and uniform diameter in’ the Laniellibranchiata; of irregular contour and vari- able diameter in the Cephalophora.’ ‘In all, the ultimate blood- channel constitutes one, single, independent ‘tube from one end of its course to the other. . Returning upon itself it does not lose its individuality: it nowhere inosculates : it reticulates in no single instance. One foundational law of structure is thus proved to preside over the disposition of the ultimate elements of the branchial organs in all the mollusks above the Tunicata. Already the thoughtful eye descries the bright, continuous thread of “principle? linking remotely separated and disjointed varieties into the golden chain of consistent unity. Another generality no less remarkable remains to be propounded. The branchiz. of a// ~ Tunicate'and-ail Lamellibranchiate, and a considerable majority of the Gasteropod ‘mollusks are penetrated by the aérating water. The branchia is a ‘sieve through which the water filters.” ‘This “‘actof branchial filtration is a fundamental fact in the history’ of all’ the inferior mollusks. The area which is circumscribed ‘by the ‘inantle, at least ‘in all Tunicate and Lamellibranchiate mol- lusks, ‘is divided more or less completely into two distinct com- partinénts; the oné' pallial and external, the other internal’ and visceral (PI. PT) ¢.as Thik figs. 9 & 13): ‘The bran- chiz’ ‘constitute cribiriform plicz developed ‘on thé’ divisional menibrane (fig. 7, ¢, ¢, e, e) by which these two compartments (ed) are Separated. ‘These leading propositions outlined in brief, will suffice ‘to prepare the mind for the right conception of those interesting details which it is now proposed to consider. °"The limits of these papers render it impossible to refer in ew- tenso to those anatomic specialties by which the branchial organs of every species are more or less differentially characterized. ‘Those ‘only ‘can be selected: for ‘study which inyolve a typical principle. Rules, not exceptions, it must be the aim of these Tivestigations to define. Tunicata. Tunicate mollusks stand immediately above the Bryozoon. From the latter they are distinguished in the possession of a heart. "The movement of the blood is due’ exclusively to the contractions of this central organ. ‘The heart is systemic and tubular. In many genera it is valveless, as indicated by alterna- tions of direction in the blood’s course. No definitely parieted vessels occur on any segment of the peripheric are of the circu- latory system. To this rule’ the branchial forms an exception. The branchial “bars ” are, however, not ordinary vessels. They are ees formed: They are not analogous to those of the yd Vo sft no aotedliv | f ‘ele Respiration in Invertebrate Animals. 37 vertebrated animals, They are bounded by skilfully. configurated cartilages, as will be afterwards explained. . In the Tunicata, as in other Acephala, the blood leaying the open ends of the arteries passes into the interstices—lacune—of the parenchyma, of the body ; thence it is taken up by the open mouths of the venous radicles. The solids are thus literally soaked in the: fluids. .The former are everywhere bathed by the latter, | It may be affirmed in a general sense, that the higher the serial position of the ani- mal, the smaller the breadth of the ultimate blood-currents, and conversely. The degree of subdivision which, occurs. in the blood-streams represents a numeric measure ofthe. nutritive actions. The area comprehended by the mantle is divisible in the Tunicata, as in Acephala, into two sub-areas.,, The one is either bounded, lined, or traversed by the branchiz, and contains the mouth; the other embraces the viscera and includes the anal outlet. This fact is absolute., That space into which the mouth opens is homologous with the pallial extra-branchial or general cavity of the mantle in the Acephala.. That in which the intes- tine terminates coincides with the intra-branchial or visceral en- closure in all bivalves. An exact conception. of these primary divisions of the body in the inferior mollusk is, really indispen- sable to the perfect understanding of those. respiratory and _ali- mentary currents of the water, the direction and relative bearing of which have perplexed anatomists from the epoch of Cuvier, to the zra of Messrs. Hancock and Clark. _,4n.the ceconomy of the Tunicate and Acephalan mollusks this principle is inviolable—that nothing, neither water nor aliment- ary particles, is conducted to the mouth, which has passed through the gills... Water charged with carbonic acid. is. never swallowed. The feculent: pellets are never and cannot be mixed with, the alimentary. The current which conveys fresh water, to the branchie is convective also of food to the mouth. . The. stream which carries away the effete product of respiration bears off the feculent rejectamenta. : There are then, in truth, but, two chief ceconomie water:move- ments in these animals—that which, enters the-pallial. or extra- branchial. space, and that) which, leaves; the visceral,|and intra- branchial inclosure., This is simple and intelligible. ,..It,resem- bles. a ray of light shining amidst .a darkness,which for half.a century has, brooded over.a, vexed and. perplexing, controversy, It.is impossible to perform: one step in. advance, towards.a-more satisfactory knowledge of this subject,.unless the meaning of the “siphons” (Pl. 1. fig..1, a, 2) be first, brought into the light of clear definition.;, They are) commonly distinguished. into,the branchial and the anal. The terms in the ordinary signification would indi- 38 De. T. Williamson ihe Mechanisin of Aquatic cate the first as the orifice of i ingress, and the last as that of egress. This, however, is not the acceptation in which they are used by authors of great celebrity. Mr. Rupert Jones* observes: ‘‘ The position of the animal is such, that of the two orifices the branchial is always the highest ; the entrance into the branchial sac being generally placed at ‘or near the superior extremity of the body, and the cesophageal opening at the base of the branchial sac having an upward-direction.” —'This is directly opposed to ‘the, definition of M.'G.'P. ‘Deshayest, who says—“ Whether connected or not, the superior siphon is always characterized as the anal, the inferior as the branchial siphon.” Of course the comparative “ superior”? must mean that which is nearest to the hinge or dorsum; “inferior,” that which is next to the venter, the antipodal point to the hinge. The branchial siphon of Mr. R. - Jones is therefore correspondent with the anal of M. Deshayes. _ The expression of Cuvier—* deux ouvertures , Séparees, Pune pour la respiration, Pautre pour les exerémens,” &¢. —suggests the idea that one tube, the branchial, is devoted exclusively to respiration ; that is, that through the same tube the mspiratory and expiratory currents concerned in breathing take place. “Dr. George Johnston observes : “ The water is imbibed through a branchial siphon. The effete flnid is expelled again through another or anal siphon f.” The branchial siphon of other authors is the longest. or superior, and is distinguished as that which emits the refuse water which has traversed the branchiz. The branchial siphon im the sense in which it is used by Mr. Garner § is synonymous with the inhalent tube, and the anal with the ex- halent. In this acceptation the terms are also used by Forbes and , Hanley I, , by Alder and Hancock§, and by Mr. Clark in-his, excellent controversial papers against Mr. Hancock in the «Annals? Dr. J. HE. Gray attaches to these) words,a similar *méaning, calling the inhalent ‘the lower” siphon, and the exha- ent ‘the upper? **, Phe “branchial”? siphon of the most, esteemed anthors then | é ae that: tubular extension (Pl. L. fig. 7,.a,,a')..of the, mantle “by which the surrounding element is admitted into the ‘ bran- * See article Tunicata.—Cyclop. Anat. Phys. + See the article Conchifera.—Cyclop. Anat. Phys. “+ See his recent excellent work, entitled ‘ Introduction to Conchology,” p. 275. Van Voorst, 1850. Poe Transactions of Zoological Society, vol. i. p. 91. || British Mollusca, vol. 1. . §[ See their valuable papers on the Branchial Currents in Pholas and Mya, Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Oct. and Nov. 1851. __ ** See his original and imstructive papers in recent Numbers of ‘the : sperm on “A Revision of the Arrangement of the Families of Bivalve Shells,” Respiration in Invertebrate Animals. 39 chial yault” (Clark), ‘“ branchial chamber” (Hancock), or “ pal- lial, cavity ” (Forbes and Hanley) (d). It is indifferently de- scribed as the “ lower,” “ shorter,’’, “ inferior ” or “ ventral.” It is the further of the two siphons from the hinge. Its office is “ inspiratory,” “ inhalent,” “branchial” or ‘ prehensile.” The “anal”. siphon, (fig. 7, 5, 0!) is variously defined as the “ upper,” “superior,” “dorsal,” “exhalent,” “ excrementitial,” “expiratory,” “longer,” &c. That is. called “inhalent,” which the most conscientious and truth-loving observers declare does not inhale: that the ‘‘ ex- halent ” to which an emissive office is strenuously denied! There are but two cavities (fig. 7, c,d) and only two siphons (fig. 6, a,0). Of the latter one communicates with one cavity, the other with the other. The boundaries of these cavities severally are con- spicuously and unequivocally marked. They are as distinctly defined as the siphons with which they respectively communicate. But though clearly bounded they are not independent. Fluid introduced into the one will unquestionably pass into the other*. Neither the process by which food is brought to the mouth, nor that.of respiration, could be understood before the fact was discovered of the permeability of the branchial lamelle, To, Dr. Sharpey should be ascribed the merit. which belongs to the first discovery of this pomt+; to Mr. Hancock that of its full and com- * At a subsequent stage of these inquiries, this general statement will be supported by abundant evidence.—See Acephala. He * Dr. Sharpey’s description cannot be misconstrued. “On removing one of the valves, turning down the cloak, and putting moistened charcoal powder on the surface of the gills, the finer part of the powder soon dis- appears, having penetrated through the interstices of the bars or vessels into the space between the two layers of the gills. On arriving there, a part is often forced out again from under the border of the unattached layer at the base of the gill, but most of it is conveyed rapidly backwards . between the two layers, and is carried out at the excretory orifice with, the general current ... The coarser particles remain- outside the gill and are _slowly carried to its edge, following the direction of the bars: they then advance along the edge of the gill towards the fore part of the animal. It thus appears that the water first passes in between the lobes of the mantle tothe external surface of the gills; it is then forced into the space enclosed between their layers, from whence it is driven out at the excretory orifice, to which the enclosed spaces of all the gills lead. As this process continues to go on after the shell.and lobe of one side are removed, it is evident that the motion of the water must be mainly produced by the cilia of the gills. . . . By their ageucy the fluid is forced into the space within the gills, and this operation taking place over the whole extent of the gills, must by its con- centrated etfect give rise to a powerful issuing stream at the excretory orifice, of which the entering stream seems to be a necessary result.’’—Art. Cii1a: Cyclop. Anat, & Phys. In this most able summary, three principles are lucidly affirmed :—Ist. That the water concerned in breathing perme- ates the branchial. lamelle, and thus trayerses the partition which divides - 40 Dr. T, Williams ow the Mechanism of Aquatic plete demonstration... Mr; Clark*, however, embraces. still the: doctrine which contends for the non-communieating independ~ ence of the siphons and of the cavities of which they are the ex- ternal continuations. In this respect, his.conclusions are directly: opposed to the results of the author’s observations, That the cavi- ties recently so clearly defined by, Mx. Hancock are. by structure and office distinct, will be afterwards irrefragably proved... This division of the pallial enclosure into, two Jeading, sub-areas con- stitutes a fundamental feature in: the ceconomy.of, the Tunicate and* Lamellibranchiate mollusks... It suggests.a natural, process of thought by which the siphonic actions are slsacenh infal- libly. It will be subsequently proved, that that 'siphon which) is: aa by Messrs. Alder and Hancock to give ingress to the water, is really no more branchial than that by which the fluid makes its egress... Both bear to the branchiz the same anatomical relation. It were as correct to designate the opercular orifice in the fish as the “anal,” and the mouth as the “ branchial,” as to apply, such terms to the siphons of the Tunicata and Acephala. . Such, de- signations misinform. They express either, what is not.true, or what is only partially true. The “ branchial”? \siphon.is as much oral or prehensile as branchial. The ‘“ exhalent”’ as. much, anal as expiratory. , _ toeiteib ead s98ce _Tt is quite established that two. distinct. offices, devolve, upott each siphon. The one is designed to take in water for. the, pur- pose of breathing, and alimentary particles for/the purposes.of food; the other emits at once the products of the respiratory and digestive processes. One name as applied.to.either, will not express the double function. Let. the name therefore be drawn the pallial from the anal chamber. 2ndiy. That by this act of sieving the food, the aliment. is separated from the water:and impelled by ciliary action towards the free margins of the gills and along the groove formed expressly for this purpose on this margin, and, finally borne in the direction of.the mouth. And 3rdly. The distinctness of the inhalent from the exhalent eurrent’;) while Dr. ‘Sharpey speaks pry upon the point that the ez- eurrent is set im motion exclusively by the branchial cilia. | It is extraordi- nary. that, in asserting claims to. originality upon; these very pointsy “in apers published ten years afterwards, so careful and honest a ‘student; as fir. Hancock should have permitted this accessible and celebrated article of Dr. Sharpey to elude his literary search! I rejoice rather than lament over Mr: Hancock’s ‘‘sin of omission.” Confirmation, enriched by nume- rous valuable original details, proceeding from so truthful an observer, must prove of immense service to,the cause of science; but, palmam qui meruit. ‘To widen the bounds of knowledge jis the highest gratification which belongs to the true man of science. This is his most valued title of nobility. Towithhold from the labourer his just reward, is to perpetrate a eriminal offence against science. * On the Pholadide.— Ann, and,Mag, Nat, Hist.;Nov, 1850. o \oRespiration in Piwerlebrute'Ahimals. °° ar froin stvacture rather thai from office. Ih thes¢'papérs Accordingly that ‘siphon which’ opens into the ‘pallial or ventral chamber wilt be° distinguished ‘as the? évtra-branchial siphon ; | that leading from ‘the “dorsal, visceral or anal cavity, as the intra-branchial siphon: These distinctives express only the anatomical position of these tubes relatively to the branchial partition by which they ave separated.| ‘They involve no hypotheses. They attribute no function.’ They cannot misguide. 7 °/In the ‘Tunicata’ the? extra-branchial siphon (PI. I. fig. 1, a; 2;@; 3) a) leads into the pharyngeal cavity (4), which is homo- logous with’ the ventral or pallial chamber of the Acephala. It is the longer ‘and higher ofthe two. All fluid which reaches the wiouth (fig.°3,°b), seated at the lower boundary of this cavity, must’gain the pharyngeal chamber through the extra-branchial siphon.’ Allahmentary substances ‘rejected by the mouth, that is; those material particles ‘not swallowed, are sent out again by a convulsive’ jerk of the’ cavity through the same siphon. It is essential to distinguish the substances thus refused by the mouth froni'the’ true exerementitious pellets which are always ejected by ‘the tatr'a‘branchial siphon, | SOIR Metts any, ‘Phe mode in which the surrounding element enters ba tate space has distracted controvertists, and divided them in ‘belief. By Mr, Haticock, representing’ one class of observers, it is main- tamed that’ thé’inhalent ‘current’ is set in motion exclusively by the* action ‘of ‘vibratile cilia seated on the linmg membrane of the’siphon itself? “By Mr. Clark this explanation is denied. The fornier naturalist rests his theory upon the alleged demon- stration ‘ofcilia°on the internal surface of the inhalent siphon, the latter upon observation of the currents. The inquiries of ,Mr.,.Hancock, were, confined :to the: Lamellibrianchiate! mol- lusks.;;,But it. may be stated with confidence, that what’is true of this class will apply to' the case of the Tunicata. ‘The dispute is ‘really easy of adjustment. The adjustment here, however, fails in this, sense, that the demonstration. which \is negative is less, persuasive than that which is positive. To prove'a denial‘is less: easy than to substantiate an affirmation.’ The microscope leaves it beyond doubt, that the internal lining membrane of the extra-branchial siphon of the Tunicate is not provided with a vibratile epithelium. They sometimes exist on the tentacles at’ the hbase ofthe siphon, but most certainly not on the walls’ of the latter. "The water which enters this siphon is assuredly therefore not drawn in by the agency of cilia within the, siphon, Further observations, are . required: to. determine) the, exact course of the currents excited by the°cilia distributed’ over’ the branchial ‘bars.’° It is’ not proved’ "that the water enters the siphon in virtue of the cilia situated at the latter point. It ¥ ° 4:2 Dr. Ty Williamson. the Mechanism of Aquatic enters at) the moment of the diastole of the pharyngeal chamber, Such a movement operates suctorially upon the fluid within the sphere of its influence. _ Having entered the cavity, the water is whirled ‘in, a, thousand. definite “directions by the branchial cilia. ‘Every particle of material substance,contaimed is rolled into minute pellets and borne in, the direction, of the mouth, If it be palatable, it is swallowed ; if, not, itis emitted forcibly again by the same siphon. The water which falls, under the influence - of the proper branchial cilia is impelled in, such manner and direction, and in myriad invisible currents, thatit permeates the branchial, membrane (fig..1, 6; fig. 2, 6) by means of the meshes circumscribed. by. the yascular bars. The passage of the water through these meshes does not occur in direct currents, but in streams which pass up and down the sides of the meshes several times before they finally reach the imétra-branchial or visceral cavity—therefrom to be rejected by the intra-branchial or anal siphon, so that. the aérating element by this, contrivance is detained, for some, time in contact with the blood- channel. The egressing current saturated with carbonic acid escapes from this, latter, siphon in a continuous stream,—-such a stream as an uninterruptedly. acting force alone,.could determine. ...The mi- eroscope was.accordingly applied tothe examination of the lining of this) siphon, anticipating the immediate detection,of vigorous ciliary action. ,Ascidians, Cynthians, and Clayellinans, submitted to careful inspection, disproved. the anticipation, . In none, by any device, could cilia be demonstrated on the inner wall of this anal. or intra-branchial siphon. - The current; therefore, which sescapes at its orifice is not set in motion. by any force within the limit of the siphon itself, but rather by that which is placed at.a distance—the, branchial ciliary action, The space, interposed between the branchial membrane and, the mantle in Tunicates forms a|part of the imtra-branchial or visceral cavity... Itis filled with, refuse, water, rendered, poisonous by carbonic acid. . This effete fluid enacts no further part inthe organism. It is finally rejected. In the Tunicata then the two siphons are continuous through the branchial stigmata, The mass of water which always, more or less fully distends the body of the animal, observes only one normal or regular movement, viz. that tending from the extra- branchial siphon (fig. 1, a) im the direction of the intra-bran- chial (4). . The irregular and occasional currents are propelled in the reverse directions. The pharyngeal cavity may muscularly contract, and now and then emit pure unrespired water, and) un- used alimentary substances; held by this water in suspension., If such discretionary power did not exist, the indiscriminating mouth would swallow every solid substance borne mechanically into the Respiration in Invertebrate Animals. 43 _ pharyngeal chamber by the water'drawn in by the extra-branchial siphon. Nature’s machinery would then, indeed, wear the dis- graceful impress of faultiness. ze NM 13 Tn the Ascidians the branchize completely line the walls of the pallial chamber. In figure the chamber varies ; it is oblong in some species, oval and rectangular in others. The branchial membrane in Ascidia, Phallusia, &c. forms a plane unfolded sheet, adapting itself to the cavity of the mantle ; m Cynthia, Boltenia, &c. it is longitudinally plicated (fig..5) and disposed in deep and regular folds. The ultimate vessels (d) are arranged rectangu- larly. The circumscribed ‘ stigmata’ (c) are parallelogrammic in figure, These perforations lead from the pharyngeal into the “thoracic” chamber of Milne-Edwards. Why it should be called ‘ thoracic’ is difficult to understand. As already defined, it is really the visceral, intra-branchial or cloacal cavity. The bran- chial vessels in the Ascidians are arranged in two planes (fig. 4). In Cynthia ampulla the meshes are very irregular and almost imextricable, some of the minute vessels having apparently’ a spiral arrangement. In Chelyosoma, Eschricht figures a similar _ vermicular disposition of the branchial vessels. The branchial membrane of Cynthia presents large longitudinal vessels. They are crossed by others of equal size. Large meshes (d) are thus formed. Smaller vessels (6) lying ona different plane form by crossing smaller stigmata. In Ascidia and Chelyosoma, the angles ‘of the meshes of the branchial membrane bear papille (c) more or less prominent. In Cynthia they do not exist. ‘These papillose processes are hollow recesses. ‘They are by-receptacles for the nutritive fluid. In size the branchial vessels vary in different genera. In Cynthia they are large, in Ascidia they are minute, in Cystingia they are indistinct. The branchial plicee converge at the mouth whenever they exist. | | By Carus and Van Beneden a lateral opening in the respi- ratory cavity has been indicated, by which the water passes di- rectly from the branchial sac into the cloaca (fig. 1, 0; fig. 3, e). This aperture corresponds with the open fissure which in many species of Acephalans exists between the attached border of! the branchize and the base of the foot. It is a safety-valve,as will ‘be hereafter explained. In Clavellinide, Botryllide, in the genera Pyrosoma, Pelonaia and Salpa, such is the structure of the. branchie, that the water readily traverses the respiratory stigmata, and passes from the extra-branchial into the intra-branchial chambers. In ‘all genera’ the branchial membrane ‘is attached by means of threads and vessels externally to the mantle. The ‘branchi# in the Clavellinide exist in form ‘of’ a ‘band stretching across the cavity of the mantle, and dividing the pha- 4A, Dr. T. Williams on the Mechanism of Aquatic _ryngeal ‘fromthe ‘cloacal chamber. “In ultimate structure the branchie of this genus differ from those of the Ascidians: in place of presenting on each’'side simple striz furnished with vibratile’cilia, as'in the Salpians, they bear right and left a series _ Of filiform appendages directed horizontally towards the ventral side of the respiratory cavity, where they are fixed on each side of the middle sulcus, and during their passage across are united together by a number of'other slender vertical filaments. From this disposition of parts there results a kind of trellis-work, which fills up all the pharyngeal portion of the branchial cham- ber, permitting no communication between the latter and the cloaca’ except through the meshes of its network, which are bordered all around with vibratile cilia*. 2 The branchial sac of the Botryllide is like that of the Clavel- linide: it is similarly organized. The branchial spiracles are variable in number. It is in general only slightly folded. The respiratory sac in Botryllus lies horizontally, and has only nine rows of stigmata, grouped into threes by the longitudinal folds. The angles of the branchial network are marked with papille in Distoma and Diazona. ae The branchie in Pyrosoma line the internal tunic of the mantle. They are orally disposed. They consist of numerous, vessels or channels anastomosing with each other at, right angles; “Nothing is more curious,” says Milne-Edwards, . “than, the respiratory apparatus of these animals, when the vibratile cilia with which each of the stigmata is furnished are simultaneonsly effecting their vorticiform movements with rapidity and perfect harmony ft.” s , - In Salpe the gill is constructed of a flattened tube, stretched - on a vertical plane obliquely across the central or. branchial cavity of the body. It is composed of a double membrane formed by a fold of the internal tunic or mantle. It partitions the, bran; chial chamber into two portions—the pharyngeal and cloacal, \, The circulatory systems of the Ascidians resemble. that of the Bryozoa. If the heart were removed, it would be a chylaqueous system. It is transitional between the Polypes and the Mollusks; Van Beneden compares the Ascidian to a digestive canal, sus- pended in the midst of an external envelope surrounded by.a fluid moving in the open spacious perintestinal space. ..It..is only in the branchial network and tentacies that it can be said.to be contained in vessels. . Mr. Gosse gives an exact description of the living circulation in Perophora Lasteri (fig.3). Speaking of the blood-globules, ‘he . * See article TunicatTa.—Cyclop. of Anat. and Phys. + Annales des Sciences Naturelles, 2nd ser. tom. xi. p. 375 (1835). Respiration in Invertebrate Animalsy 45 observes, “ They do, not appear to pass into\a defined..system, of vessels, ..., but find the way through, the. interstices, of the various organs in the various cavities of, the body... .... They pro- ceed by jerks ; some find their way into the space between. the breathing surfaces, and slip in between the. rows of oral rings (stigmata), and wind along. down, between the rings in irregular courses*,” re In the Ascidiade and Clavellinide the centres of this system consist of two trunks, a. dorsal and a. ventral, the capillary system of the branchiz being intermediate... Lister’s famed. ob- servations on this subject should be consulted}... The descrip- tive details afterwards to be presented on the subject, of the respiratory and circulatory systems of the Acephalans, will illus- trate many points of interest in the structure of the correspond- ing systems of the Tunicata. The peripheric. channels of the blood are analogous in the two classes. The ultimate structure, though not the arrangement of the vessels of the. branchiz. is also similar, The nutritive fluids, morphotically, distinctive, are chemically identical in the two classes, Acephala, “Tn ‘the Terebratulide there exists no express apparatus for breathing. ~ With the Craniade they are therefore placed at the inferior limit of the Lamellibranchiate series. Prof. Owen has shown that the mantle in the Brachiopods is more vascular than in°those orders of bivalves in which gills exist. Dr. Carpenter - has lately shown that the external layer of the mantle in Tere- bratula and certain other Brachiopoda, sends out. cecal, tubes through the shell. They are respiratory in office, and the exact counterpart of those membranous processes which the author of these’ papers has described in the Echinodermata as. projecting up above the external surface of the body. The cecal character of these parts establishes a community of type between the fluid system of the Brachiopods and the chylaqueous system as de- fined by the author, The arms are long, richly ciliated tubes. In these tubes the blood moves in a single channel by flux and reflux. This incident also in the history of the fluids allies these inferior mollusks with those animals in which a chylaqueous system only exists. This latter fluid never undergoes an orbital movement: it fluctuates to and fro: The ultimate, respects in which the vessels in the manile of the Brachiopods differ from * See. his interesting work; ‘A Naturalist’s. Rambles on the Devonshire Coast,’ p. 245. + Phil. Trans. 1834, t Proceedings of the Royal Society, April 6, 1854. 46 Dr. T., Williams on the Mechanism of Aquatic those of the mantle of the mgher Acephala;, and what differen- tiation of these parts was required to enable an ordinary structure to discharge a special office, has been shown. by Dr. Carpenter. The organs of breathing are well developed in all the Lamel- libranchiate Acephalans., Their vascular, system is elaborately multiplied. They are capable of containing a considerable amount of blood. If aquatie were not less intense than atmospheric re- spiration, the aggregate area of the surface exposed by the gills of mollusks in general would insure a measure of effect, sufficient to raise these animals high in the scale of physiological activity, Surface is not the only factor to be counted in determining the dynamic value of the respiratory office. The composition of the blood demands a numeric place in the calculation. If the fluid occupying the vessels were identical in density with the exterior element, no interchange of gases could proceed., A difference in the specific densities of the gases held in solution by. fluids of identical gravities would constitute a condition in virtue of which the gases would reciprocally move independently of the fluids, The less the proportion of fibrine in the blood, other things being equal, the lower is its absorptive capacity for gases. The blood of mollusks is less charged with fibrine than that. of the. higher Articulata. In the former the floating corpuscles are less highly organized. They are) strikingly less. filled with solid contents. They are smaller and yet not more numerous. The physical conditions as regards the fluids then are not-favourable in the Mollusea to a high rate of respiration. F Cuvier first defined the bivalve mollusks under the title of Acephala testacea. By Lamarck they were constituted into. a separate class under the name of Conchifera. M. de Blainyille marshalled them under the order Acephalophora lamellibran- chiata. The anatomical definition of Cuvier presents clearly the chief points of structure :—“ Leur corps qui renferme le foie et les viscéres est placé entre les deux lames du manteau; en avant, toujours entre ces lames, sont les quatre feuillets bran- chiaux striés reguliérement en travers par les vaisseaux ; la bouche est A une extremité, l’anus A l’autre, le coeur du cété ‘an dos ; le pied, lorsqu’il existe; est attaché entre les quatre branchies*. 3 The mantle of the mollusk is a grand feature of the organism. Its horizontal lobes embrace, its vertical process, on which the branchie are evolved structurally and functionally, bisects, the whole body. The mantle at once invests and secretes the shell, and forms the very basis of the body of the animal. It is com- posed of muscles, nerves, fibres, and vessels. It is lined inter- nally in all cases with vibratile epithelium. A. straight line, * Ragne Animal, vol: sur,les Mollusques, p.. 182. Respiration in Invertebrate Animals. 47 carried from the anterior to the posterior extremity of the shell in any Acephalan, divides the mantle and the body into two very distinct and dissimilar halves.’ On one side lie the branchiz and extra-branchial, ventral, or oral chamber (PI. II. fig. 13) ; on the other are disposed’ the viscera, the intra-branchial or dorsal cavity; with the latter the exhalent’ or intra-branchial siphon is necessarily and invariably connected ; in this dorsal compart- menit, also, the anal orifice terminates. That cavity (b) which lies ‘on the ventral (the side opposed to the hinge) or right side of the ‘hypothetical line, whether the ventral borders of the mantle be open or closed, siphonal or asiphonal, is always and necessarily filled with pure water. In this chamber the branchie (PL. I. fig. 7?, a, b) whatever be their number or position, figure or size, freely float; it is here always that the oral orifice (fig. 13,'a) opens; it is at once a reservoir of pure water for breathing and pure material for food. All varieties centre in the! unity ‘of this idea—all specific aberrations are reducible to this basilar type. Specific diversities arise more frequently from variations in the number, size, siphonal or non-siphonal charactér of the openings communicating with this (oral or extra-branchial) chamber (PI. I. fig. 6, 4,6; fig. 7, c, d), than from' ‘those which occur in the siphonal processes of the intra- branchial or anal cavity (fig. 13, e). Mr. Clark * and Dr. J. Bi. Gray} ‘are ‘the most recent and distinguished conchologists who have ‘attempted intelligently to found a classification of the Conchifera on the basis of the varieties which occur in the pallial ‘orifices. Dr. Gray groups the whole class under two primary designations—the Siphonophora and Asiphonophora— which are again subclassified into orders, genera, and species. In ‘the Pholadide, Myade, Gastrochenide, and Solenide, the ventral borders of the mantle are united, and the siphonal tubes are long'and more or less distinct. The mantle is also closed in the Corbulide and Anatinide, but the siphons are short. In the Tellinide the mantle is open, while the tubes are prolonged. An open mantle coexists with short siphons in Cardiadée, Vene- ride, Mactride, and Donacide. An open mantle is co-present with sessile tubes in Cycladide, Kelliade, Lucinide, Cyprinide, Unionidee, and Arcade. In Mytilide, Ostreade, Pectinide, and Anomiadie, the whole gape of the mantle is one undistinguished ¢apacious orifice. Guided by the rule that pure water must in some manner or other, with adequate freedom, be admitted into the oral or extra-branchial cavity, it is quite obvious that the * Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., June 1851. “On the Classification of the Marine and Testaceous Mollusca.” + Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., May 1854. 48 Dr. T. Wilhams,on.the, Mechanism of Aquatic larger the ventral. or common opening of. the mantle, the /ess.is the necessity forthe lower,or extra-branchial siphon. . If, on the contrary, the leaves of. the, mantle be fused.at,their borders all round, a well-developed siphon.is absolutely required. This cavity must have a free, and, ready communication. with’ the, exterior. If this communication.js not,established in one mode, it must in another.. Asiphon isa necessary provision, if; the. mantle..be closed ;.. if open,.it, is.only supplementary... Inthe former. case, everything fluid and solid which.enters. the, palhal/ cavity must pass through the extra-brauchial siphon... It can gain the cham= ber.through no other. source... Inthe latter, the siphon is,only incidentally and. occasionally used.. The great, bulk, of, water drawn into the cavity rushes in through the ventral,.and pedal openings... That. which, alike solid and. fluid,.is,,returned..un- used from this cavity, is indiscriminately jerked out, by muscular action through any.of the mantual openings. If,\the pellet of sand. be,situated near the opening of, the siphon,of ; this cavity, at/the moment when it,receives the impulse of ejectment; ityescapes through the: znhalent or.extra-branchial, siphon (Pl. I. fig. 6,5). If, on the, contrary, it be, placed at the other end. of the chamber, it;will be driven out either through the ventral or,,pedal, gape. The. orifice and,,direction in which refused jets of water, take place from, this cavity are contingent upon. the position which the rejected. portion. may have previously occupied in, the, cavity. Upon this important point neither Mr. Clark nor Mr. Hancock are; Clearly informed., Mr. Clark is correct.in stating that) the ingress. of the water into the great mantual.or extra-branchial cavity 1s due, not to the invisible agency of vibratile epithelium on the lining membrane of the siphon, but to the diastolic, sepa- ration of the valves. Mr. Hancock is undoubtedly in error in stating that the water entering this cavity is drawn. in. by, cilia of the, siphon... The. microscope disproves completely. the asser«: tion! that: the internal lining membrane of the inhalent or extra~’ branchial siphon is the scene of ciliated epithelium. In ‘no single instance of the numerous siphonal species examined by the author, could cilia be discovered in this.situation. — Lf.at this: place. cilia do not exist, it admits of no dispute, that the occasional inward-tending current which reaches the cavity through this siphon cannot be due to the instrumentality of cilia, at this point at least. Mr. Clark is unquestionably. wrong in supposing that, because now and then the inhalent or extra- branchial siphon, and the ventral and pedal openings of the mantle emit a jet of water and solid pellets, this cavity is therefore inde- pendent, that the “siphons therefore do not communicate,’ and that therefore the ingress and egress of the, water designed..for respiration take place through the same orifices.” Every one of Respiration in Invertebraté'Animals, “= = 49 these inferences are non-sequiturs. © Mr. Hancock is inaccurate im affirming that ad/ the water which enters this cavity from with- out travels ‘exclusively along the inhalent © or extra-branchial siphon; and never, under’ any ¢irctimstanee, through either thé. ventral or pedal openings*.°' 4 the water’ which is admitted into the extra-branchial cavity is not respired; in other language, does not pass through the branchiz into the dorsal or intra- branchial chamber (fig. 6)/); nor is ad/ the solid substance, which it may perchance contain, seized’ by the mouth and swallowed. The’ act of the passage of the true respiratory water from one ehamber' ‘into the other is an’ involuntary act. The volume of the*fluid and the rate of its motion are definite, and proportional to the organi¢ wants of the animal.’ The movement’ by which water is' drawn from without into the extra-branchial reservoir is - voluntary +; and dependent in frequency of recurrence upon the antity of food which it may bear in ‘suspension, and upon the egree of its purity. ‘The body of water which ‘at any giver mioment’ the extra-branchial cavity may contain, is sieved by thé eilia;’ which -are ‘distributed ‘over the external surfaces’ of the braneliiee, © These cilia, as will be subsequently explained, ‘raise abroad*eutrent (see arrows on the branchie ‘in fies.'6, 8, &'9); very visible to the naked eye, which ‘always and Systematically sets in the*direction of the free'‘or tnattachéed borders of thé branchial! lamelle, These currents begin’ at ‘the’ attached °or proximal edges of all the lamellae. jarogen eid3 10qU or!'Tliey observe’ the same’ directions on the under as'on’ the upper! surface ofeach lamella (sce arrows on the branchia in fig 7). (They*are true food-searching currents: The’ ‘pelléets formed by their agency, having attained the’ free ‘margin; *9* In ¢orrecting what earnest and faithful observation and research have convinced me'to be errors,” I deal in no flattery or hypocritical circtimlo” cution., ~I, do,not, honour great) men the less because‘a repetition of then? - procedures has assured.me that. in some special particulars they may, have approved themselves false, It is because their genius has first. indieated a mnain highway through a tangled wilderness, that faithful observers amongst their successors are enabled to mark the poimts whereat the sin of: minor deviations from the straight course may have been’ committed.’ It .is in this spirit that .I have ventured.to criticise the acute labours of Mr. Hancock and Mr. Clark. _ It is in this spirit, I trust, that my criticism. will be reeeived.. The brief limits of these papers, in which results rather than processes are embodied, preclude all reference to details, dissections, ex- perinents, observations on the livmg ‘animals, ‘injections, &e.- Once for all, L affirm, that. no assertion hasbeen: rashly projected in these papers which has not been conscientiously, submitted to. the test of fact, and weighed in the balance of practical trial. ~* The influence of the cilia of the branchial lamelle upon this in- gréssing current ‘has never yet been clearly perceived. Such imfluence is undoubtedly exerteds) 5) > | ey: Ann. & Mag. N. Hist. Ser. 2. Vol. xiv. 4 50 Dr. T. Williams ‘ow the Mechanism of Aquatic are carried in the direction’ of the mouth and tried and tasted by the palpi (fig. 6, 7,7). Those which ‘are’ acceptable’ are swallowed; those which are unpalatable ‘dye carried completely out of the cavity indifferently by any one of its openings, lest they should again pass over the’branchise: So incomparably ad- justed are the cilia which ‘render the gills a wondrous spectacle of infinitesimal currents, so precise and’ fore-ordained are. the directions in which they move,’ thatthe ‘act’ which sieves’ the food from the water drives also that water from the recipient into the refuse chamber (fig. 6, f; Pl. 1. fig. 12, h), through the meshes circumscribed by the branchial ‘vessels. This stage of the respiratory process is strictly involuntary. ‘It is governed by in- violable organic laws, not volitional caprice. ‘It is’ to the molltsk what the insensible involuntary physical exos-and éndosmose of gases in the ultimate air-cells of the lungs are to the mammiah It differs physically and physiologically from the’ act iv which water is drawn into the cavity of the mantle, as'strikingly'as ‘the thoracic movements of respiration in’ Man ‘differ from the ultiz mate’ process.’ ‘Thus, whatever ‘may be the number; ‘size; Sr prominence of the openings* of the niantlé; the fuiietions: of the great ventral chamber remain tnchanged. ‘They are “and nvust bé in’‘eyery instance, under -all general mutations of character, those of a reservoir from which food is drawn ‘to the’ mouth and the aérating element to the branchiz. IR ARTO (TSO The second great cavity (Pl. I. fig. 6, 3 fig. 7)°e02 PLIL. fiz. 8, d; fig. 9, e; fig. 10, ¢, ¢; fig. 12,:h); lying to the left, dorsal, or “the hinge” side of the imaginary \line@fortierly defined, remains now to be described. It is' limited’ venttradly by the branchiz, dorsadly by. the hinge, and posteriorly ‘by’ the ex-current siphon. : IL YieVOULII M09 The anal chamber does not in all genera’ communicate openly and directly with the interlamellar passages. The’ former really arises in the latter, when only one of the proximal borders of the branchial lamellz is attached to the side of the visceral miss } _ the grooves, running antero-posteriorly and’ parallel with’ the length of the gill, and situated between its proximal borders and \ ~2*® 'T would beg here to-refer the student to the interesting papers of Mr. Hancock, im the ‘Annals and Magazine of Natural History.’ during the years 1852 and 1853, for an account of the collateral openings which in some genera occur inthe mantle. In Chamostrea albida, in addition to'the nor- mal siphonal orifices and pedal and ventral gapes, he describes another of minute size, which is situated under the lower siphon. A similar ‘aperture existsin other: Lamellibranchiates, .Mr: Hancock has observed it in. Lutraria, Cochlodesma, Panopeaand Myochama and,Prof. Owen in, Pholadomya. It is clear from the explanation given in the text, that these secondary aper- tures are really secondary in meaning. “They do not in the least affect the physiological character’ of the eavity.?' | | Respiration in Invertebrate, Animals, ie the-visceral mass, although,open, form really the.commencement of the anal chamber. |... : 7 Mytilus and, Pecten exemplify. the, type,of this condition (Pl. L..fig...7)... The outer plate (c, c'), of each. lamella is free or unattached at. its, proximal, margin... This latter is, thick and strong. It is: composed.of the large afferent and.efferent. trunks. In, Mytilus and Pecten\it.is not.fringed by.a slender membrane as jin. Cardium) and, Pholas., (fig.,6,.e,,f) and Mya, &c. The gutter,or channel, (fig. 7, f,f) formed by the attached. or lower lamella of the superior gill and the free or unattached. or, upper plate, opens consequently imto the, extra-branchial or pallial cavity in. a, direct manner... The water flowing along this groove (fig. .10,..¢) does not. however return into this latter cavity, except under, extraordinary circumstances, . It is conducted in a yapid,course; impelled by the branchial cilia, in the direction of the) cloaca, (fig. 10,.e).. The groove formed at the proximal margins of the inferior, or as it 1s falsely called, the supplemental gill, (fig. 7?,¢’), opens in like manner. into the pallial cavity, but on the,under surface., It receives the expiratory currents of the lower, gill, and, conveys them in form of a,strong single current towards the.exhalent siphon. , In Cardium(P1, LL. fig. 9), Pholas (figs ,7),.Mya,,,Solen, Cochlodesma, and,,.Pholadomya,, the, two plates, of, each; branchial. lamella on both, sides, are attached, the upper to the side of the body and. foot, the lower to.the mantle, {|The groove bounded by the plates of the branchial lamellze is divided; off, therefore, in these genera by a continuous mem- brane.(fig..9 f).from. the pallial chamber. Mr. Hancock says, that, in the. siphonal families. this membrane. forms a,complete partition between. the pallial and anal cavities, since it extends continuously from the anterior to the posterior extremity, of the upper, plate... The author’s observations have convinced him, that, while in. Cardium, Pholas, Solen, and Mya this membrane stretches, posteriorly over the cloaca in a hood- or tongue-like form,, it..leaves, between its edge and the side of. the foot. a fissural opening through which the two cavities freely communi- cate. The difference, then, between the siphonal and non- siphonal families as respects the parts concerned in respiration, may be defined as consisting in the degree in which the, intra- branchial grooves are anatomically isolated from the open space of the pallial cavity. Such points are non-essential, distinctions: while they denote the. existence of trifling structural, varieties, they ,mvolve,,no diversities in the methods of action... Whether partially open or conipletely closed, the grooves (fig.6,) running horizontally at the proximal borders of the gills and between their component plates, convey the exhalent current, received from. the gills in the 4x 52 Dr. T. Williams onthe Mechanism of Aquatic diréttion of ‘the:cloacas' When) :there: exist»two separate bran- chial lamelle., on either side, there exist two grooves ; when one, only one. SISIINU MT ITOS Vilsqo 4 : sThe: anal'chamber;:then;: should be defined as beginning in these intra-branchial grooves, ‘but reniotely or| primarily im the inter-lamellar » water-passages\.of Mr. Haneock: - The mode) in which this chamber communicates with’ the water-tubes between they branchial! lamelle-is thus described! by ‘Mr. Hancock:-—-: “(]. the anal:chamber (in Pholas:crispata) was laid open, and its ventral wall:was:seen ‘to exhibit: four longitudinal rows of large orifices’ i» These four rows: of orifices, already well: known. to anatomists, correspond: to the :attached:margins of the four: gill- platés, which hang fromthe roof or dorsal) membrane: of the branchial: chamber; this membrane being the ventral wall of the anal chamber, the membrane, in fact; which divides the chambers: These orifices lead into wide tubes, which pass between the two: lamine formingreach :gill-plate.. These inter-branchial tubes ‘lie contiguous and parallel to each other, and extend)the full\ width: of :the gill, ‘being bifid: within its free: margin.) Thus it is evident: that: the tubes within the gill-plates communicate: freely: with the: anal: chamber*.” - This: description: is exact,’ but: it) shouldbe ‘thus qualified: In those: siphonal: families m which: » the’ gills'are united posteriorly \(this: is the case om! Unio; Ano-\ donta, Mactra, Cardium, Isocardia; Lutraria) and prolonged into: the»anhalent siphon, the anal chamber “is) considerabby:more: capacious than in those in which the branchial plates of:opposite: sides ‘aredistmet and ununited posteriorly (this condition as! observed:\in ‘Pecten, Avicula, Arca, Pectunculus, and) Pinna); or in-those im which the siphons are suppressed.’ °In ‘all cases; the: anal! chamber: commences anteriorly (fig.)10,c) in’ grooves more: or less extended, formed, as: already defined; between the plates: of the branchial lamellz and the side of the’visceral mass and foot: These grooves terminate and pour their contents‘in aveonti=) nuous stream into the anal chamber—-a' cloacal: cavity common tothe branchiz:and intestine: oIn all cases then the interlamellar: water~passages:open throughoutithe waterior half or thirdof the gillso into ithe) ~water-grooves at their bases, posteriorly directly into) the icloaca/or analchamber.' This definition, so positive, precludes all misconception. « It leaves the cavities functionally distinct in.all genera, though in ‘some structurally continuous.